The URL can be used to link to this page

Agenda 12/14/2021 Item # 9C (Resolution - PL20200000115 - Hacienda Lakes Parkway)9.0 12/14/2021 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Recommendation to approve a Resolution amending Ordinance No. 89-05, as amended, the Collier County Growth Management Plan for the unincorporated area of Collier County, Florida, specifically amending the Future Land Use Element to change the Mixed -Use District, Collier Boulevard Community Facility Subdistrict to the Mixed Use District; Collier Boulevard Lord's Way Mixed Use Subdistrict; to increase the maximum dwelling units from 306 to 690 with some affordable housing; to remove childcare facilities as an allowed use and allow the church to continue as an interim use for up to 5 years; and furthermore directing transmittal of the amendment to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity. The subject property is located on the northeast corner of the intersection of Collier Boulevard and Hacienda Lakes Parkway formerly known as Lord's Way, in Section 14, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, consisting of 69f acres. [PL20200000115] (Transmittal Hearing). OBJECTIVE: For the Board of County Commissioners (Board) to approve the proposed large-scale Growth Management Plan (GMP) amendment to change the Mixed Use District, Collier Boulevard Community Facility Subdistrict to the Mixed Use District; Collier Boulevard Lord's Way Mixed Use Subdistrict to increase the maximum dwelling units from 306 to 690; to remove childcare facilities as allowed uses; allow the church to continue as an interim use for up to 5 years; and furthermore directing transmittal of the amendment to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity. CONSIDERATIONS: The subject petition is submitted as a large-scale comprehensive plan amendment (a/k/a Growth Management Plan Amendment - GMPA). As such, per Florida Statutes, the request is heard twice by the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) and the Board. If approved by the Board, the petition is transmitted to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity (DEO). The GMP amendment requested is for approximately 69 acres located at the northeast corner of the intersection of Collier Blvd. and Hacienda Lakes Blvd. formerly known as Lord's Way Blvd. in Section 14, Township 50 South, Range 26 East. This petition seeks to amend the GMP, adopted by Ordinance No. 89-05, as amended, specifically amending the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) by: Amending text to increase the maximum dwelling units from 306 to 690 Urban Mixed Use District; in the 69-acre Collier Boulevard Community Facility Subdistrict; to be renamed to Collier Blvd. Lord's Way Mixed Use Subdistrict, within the Future Land Use Element to the subdistrict to allow for an additional 384 dwelling units in addition to the 306 already constructed residential units. The proposed amended Subdistrict text, as recommended for approval by the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC), is in Ordinance Exhibit "A". The process for adoption of a large-scale comprehensive plan amendment requires (in part) the following statutory standards be met [followed by staff analysis in bracketed and italicized text]. According to the DEO Website, an Expedited State Review may be described as follows: (a) Are not small scale amendments. [The proposed amendment is a large scale amendment of more than a 50 acre property - 69f acres.] (b) Are not within an area of critical state concern. [This amendment is not within an area of critical state concern.] Packet Pg. 282 9.0 12/14/2021 (c) Do not propose a rural land stewardship area. [The amendment does not propose a rural land stewardship area. ] (d) Do not propose a sector plan. [The amendment does not propose a sector plan.] (e) Do not update a comprehensive plan based on an evaluation and appraisal. [The amendment does not update a comprehensive plan based on an evaluation and appraisal.] (f) Do not propose a development pursuant to section 380.06, Florida Statutes, or, [The amendment does not propose a development pursuant to section 380.06, Florida Statutes.] (g) Are not new plans for newly incorporated municipalities. [Amendment is not new plans for newly incorporated municipalities.] According to Florida Statutes Section 163.3167, "3) EXPEDITED STATE REVIEW PROCESS FOR ADOPTION OF COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS. - (a) The process for amending a comprehensive plan described in this subsection shall apply to all amendments except as provided in paragraphs (2)(b) and (c) and shall be applicable statewide. (b)1. The local government, after the initial public hearing held pursuant to subsection (11), shall transmit within 10 working days the amendment or amendments and appropriate supporting data and analyses to the reviewing agencies. The local governing body shall also transmit a copy of the amendments and supporting data and analyses to any other local government or governmental agency that has filed a written request with the governing body. 2. The reviewing agencies and any other local government or governmental agency specified in subparagraph 1. may provide comments regarding the amendment or amendments to the local government. State agencies shall only comment on important state resources and facilities that will be adversely impacted by the amendment if adopted. Comments provided by state agencies shall state with specificity how the plan amendment will adversely impact an important state resource or facility and shall identify measures the local government may take to eliminate, reduce, or mitigate the adverse impacts. Such comments, if not resolved, may result in a challenge by the state land planning agency to the plan amendment. Agencies and local governments must transmit their comments to the affected local government such that they are received by the local government not later than 30 days after the date on which the agency or government received the amendment or amendments. Reviewing agencies shall also send a copy of their comments to the state land planning agency. 3. Comments to the local government from a regional planning council, county, or municipality shall be limited as follows: a. The regional planning council review and comments shall be limited to adverse effects on regional resources or facilities identified in the strategic regional policy plan and extra jurisdictional impacts that would be inconsistent with the comprehensive plan of any affected local government within the region. A regional planning council may not review and comment on a proposed comprehensive plan amendment prepared by such council unless the plan amendment has been changed by the local government subsequent to the preparation of the plan amendment by the regional planning council. b. County comments shall be in the context of the relationship and effect of the proposed plan amendments on the county plan. c. Municipal comments shall be in the context of the relationship and effect of the proposed plan amendments on the municipal plan. d. Military installation comments shall be provided in accordance with s. 163.3175. 4. Comments to the local government from state agencies shall be limited to the following subjects as they relate to important state resources and facilities that will be adversely impacted by the amendment if Packet Pg. 283 9.0 12/14/2021 adopted: a. The Department of Environmental Protection shall limit its comments to the subjects of air and water pollution; wetlands and other surface waters of the state; federal and state-owned lands and interest in lands, including state parks, greenways and trails, and conservation easements; solid waste; water and wastewater treatment; and the Everglades ecosystem restoration. b. The Department of State shall limit its comments to the subjects of historic and archaeological resources. c. The Department of Transportation shall limit its comments to issues within the agency's jurisdiction as it relates to transportation resources and facilities of state importance. d. The Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission shall limit its comments to subjects relating to fish and wildlife habitat and listed species and their habitat. e. The Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services shall limit its comments to the subjects of agriculture, forestry, and aquaculture issues. f. The Department of Education shall limit its comments to the subject of public -school facilities. g. The appropriate water management district shall limit its comments to flood protection and floodplain management, wetlands and other surface waters, and regional water supply. h. The state land planning agency shall limit its comments to important state resources and facilities outside the jurisdiction of other commenting state agencies and may include comments on countervailing planning policies and objectives served by the plan amendment that should be balanced against potential adverse impacts to important state resources and facilities. (c)1. The local government shall hold its second public hearing, which shall be a hearing on whether to adopt one or more comprehensive plan amendments pursuant to subsection (11). If the local government fails, within 180 days after receipt of agency comments, to hold the second public hearing, the amendments shall be deemed withdrawn unless extended by agreement with notice to the state land planning agency and any affected person that provided comments on the amendment. The 180-day limitation does not apply to amendments processed pursuant to s. 380.06. 2. All comprehensive plan amendments adopted by the governing body, along with the supporting data and analysis, shall be transmitted within 10 working days after the second public hearing to the state land planning agency and any other agency or local government that provided timely comments under subparagraph (b)2. 3. The state land planning agency shall notify the local government of any deficiencies within 5 working days after receipt of an amendment package. For purposes of completeness, an amendment shall be deemed complete if it contains a full, executed copy of the adoption ordinance or ordinances; in the case of a text amendment, a full copy of the amended language in legislative format with new words inserted in the text underlined, and words deleted stricken with hyphens; in the case of a future land use map amendment, a copy of the future land use map clearly depicting the parcel, its existing future land use designation, and its adopted designation; and a copy of any data and analyses the local government deems appropriate. 4. An amendment adopted under this paragraph does not become effective until 31 days after the state land planning agency notifies the local government that the plan amendment package is complete. If timely challenged, an amendment does not become effective until the state land planning agency or the Administration Commission enters a final order determining the adopted amendment to be in compliance. Based on the review of this large-scale GMP amendment petition, including the supporting data and analysis, staff makes the following findings and conclusions: • The purpose of this GMPA is to allow a maximum of 690 dwelling units. • There are no adverse environmental impacts as a result of this petition. • No historic or archaeological sites are affected by this amendment. • There are no transportation concerns as a result of this petition. • There are no concerns for impacts upon other public infrastructure. Packet Pg. 284 9.0 12/14/2021 • The use is generally compatible with surrounding development based upon the high-level review conducted for a GMP amendment. The documents provided for the amendment supports the proposed changes to the FLUE. The complete staff analysis of this petition is provided in the CCPC Staff Report. FISCAL IMPACT: The cost to process, review, and advertise this petition was borne by the petitioner via application and advertisement fees. Therefore, there are no fiscal impacts to Collier County as a result of the adoption of this amendment. GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: Approval of the proposed amendment by the Board for Transmittal and its submission to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity and other statutorily required agencies will commence the Department's thirty (30) day review process and ultimately return the amendment to the CCPC and the Board for Adoption hearings tentatively in early 2022. LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: This Growth Management Plan (GMP) amendment is authorized by, and subject to the procedures established in, Chapter 163, Part II, Florida Statutes, The Community Planning Act, and by Collier County Resolution No. 12-234, as amended. The Board should consider the following criteria in making its decision: "plan amendments shall be based on relevant and appropriate data and an analysis by the local government that may include but not be limited to, surveys, studies, community goals and vision, and other data available at the time of adoption of the plan amendment. To be based on data means to react to it in an appropriate way and to the extent necessary indicated by the data available on that particular subject at the time of adoption of the plan or plan amendment at issue." Section 163.3177(1)(f), FS. In addition, Section 163.3177(6)(a)2, FS provides that FLUE plan amendments shall be based on surveys, studies, and data regarding the area, as applicable including: a. The amount of land required to accommodate anticipated growth. b. The projected permanent and seasonal population of the area. C. The character of undeveloped land. d. The availability of water supplies, public facilities, and services. e. The need for redevelopment, including the renewal of blighted areas and the elimination of non -conforming uses which are inconsistent with the character of the community. f. The compatibility of uses on lands adjacent to or closely proximate to military installations. g. The compatibility of uses on lands adjacent to an airport as defined in s. 330.35 and consistent with s. 333.02. h. The need to modify land uses and development patterns with antiquated subdivisions. i. The discouragement of urban sprawl. j. The need for job creation, capital investment and economic development that will strengthen and diversify the community's economy. This item is approved as to form and legality. It requires a majority for approval for this transmittal hearing. [HFAC] STAFF RECOMMENDATION TO THE COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION: Staff recommends not supporting the proposed amendment. Staff could support the request if the affordable housing bonus was targeted to income levels more in line with the existing affordable housing density bonus. COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION (CCPQ RECOMMENDATION: The CCPC held a public hearing on November 4, 2021 and voted 4-1 (Commissioner Shea was an opposed vote) to forward the petition to the Board with a recommendation to adopt the amendment with the following suggestions: (L) The developer provide 10% (38 DUs) of the requested 384 additional Dwelling units be Packet Pg. 285 9.0 12/14/2021 dedicated for Essential Services Personnel for a period of time to be determined later and the Planning Commission wishes to also recommend (2.) adding the text below for the interim use of the church: VIII. INTERIM USE Religious organizations (Group 8661. Limited to churches and religious organizations) shall be permitted to continue within Tract A for a time not to exceed 5 years from the date of approval of this Ordinance or until such time that a Site Development Plan has been approved for the development of residential units within Tract A, whichever occurs first. After five years from the date of approval of this Ordinance, or when a SDP has been approved for the residential development within Tract A, the identified religious organization use shall cease and is no longer deemed permitted. Further, if the structure of the religious organization is to be destroyed by any means to an extent of more than 50% of its replacement cost at time of destruction, it shall not be reconstructed. It should be noted, that Staff has incorporated the above interim church language within the attached Resolution, but suggest to include the dedication of 10% of the units to Essential Service Personal within the PUD during the Adoption Hearings. (3.) and transmit to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity. There were no public comment letters submitted supporting or opposing the project. There were public comments expressed at the CCPC meeting on Nov. 4 by Roger Lawson, the President of the HOA of Naples Lakes that favor housing that is for sale and not rental units and let the market decide. STAFF RECOMMENDATION TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS: Approve the Ordinance to transmit petition PL20200000115 to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity per the CCPC recommendations, but also to include the following additional recommendation for affordable housing be included within the transmitted Resolution: Thirty-eight units will be designated for households whose incomes are between 80% and 120% of the AMI for Collier County. These units will be committed for a period of 30 years and AMI rent limit adjustments will be made on an annual basis according to the most recent Collier County Board approved Table of Rental Rates for each income category and the number of bedrooms in the unit. [slim Thirty-eight units will be designated for sale to households whose initial certified incomes are between 80%-120% of the AMI for Collier County. These units will be committed for a period of 30 years and affordability for all units sold to eligible households will be secured through the execution of a lien in accordance with Chapter 2.06.04 of the LDC between Collier County Board of County Commissioners and the buyer to be recorded with the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, Florida. Prepared by: Sue Faulkner, Principal Planner, Zoning Division ATTACHMENT(S) 1. Collier Blvd Lord's Way staff report 11-4-21 (DOCX) 2. Resolution - 120121 (PDF) 3. Collier Boulevard -Lords Way MU Subdistrict (PL20200000115) CCPC Back -Up Documents (PDF) 4. ND-GCI0748104-01 (PDF) Packet Pg. 286 9.0 12/14/2021 5. NIM Documents (PDF) 6. legal ad - agenda ID 20605 (PDF) Packet Pg. 287 9.0 12/14/2021 COLLIER COUNTY Board of County Commissioners Item Number: 9.0 Doe ID: 20605 Item Summary: Recommendation to approve a Resolution amending Ordinance No. 89-05, as amended, the Collier County Growth Management Plan for the unincorporated area of Collier County, Florida, specifically amending the Future Land Use Element to change the Mixed -Use District, Collier Boulevard Community Facility Subdistrict to the Mixed Use District; Collier Boulevard Lord's Way Mixed Use Subdistrict; to increase the maximum dwelling units from 306 to 690 with some affordable housing; to remove childcare facilities as an allowed use and allow the church to continue as an interim use for up to 5 years; and furthermore directing transmittal of the amendment to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity. The subject property is located on the northeast corner of the intersection of Collier Boulevard and Hacienda Lakes Parkway formerly known as Lord's Way, in Section 14, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, consisting of 69f acres. [PL20200000115] Meeting Date: 12/14/2021 Prepared by: Title: Principal Planner — Zoning Name: Gabriela Castro 11/14/2021 3:04 PM Submitted by: Title: — Zoning Name: Mike Bosi 11/14/2021 3:04 PM Approved By: Review: Growth Management Department Zoning Zoning Growth Management Department Growth Management Department County Attorney's Office Office of Management and Budget Office of Management and Budget County Attorney's Office County Manager's Office Board of County Commissioners Lissett DeLaRosa Growth Management Department Mike Bosi Zoning Director Review James Sabo Additional Reviewer Trinity Scott Transportation James C French Growth Management Heidi Ashton-Cicko Level 2 Attorney of Record Review Debra Windsor Level 3 OMB Gatekeeper Review Laura Zautcke Additional Reviewer Jeffrey A. Klatzkow Level 3 County Attorney's Office Review Amy Patterson Level 4 County Manager Review Geoffrey Willig Meeting Pending Completed 11/16/2021 9:55 AM Completed 11/18/2021 8:47 AM Completed 11/19/2021 8:40 AM Skipped 11/19/2021 10:16 AM Completed 11/19/2021 7:09 PM Completed 12/01/2021 4:18 PM Completed 12/02/2021 8:17 AM Completed 12/02/2021 8:42 AM Completed 12/03/2021 9:58 AM Completed 12/06/2021 3:28 PM 12/14/2021 9:00 AM Packet Pg. 288 9.C.1 Co)*;er County STAFF REPORT COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: HEARING DATE: SUBJECT: ELEMENTS: GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT, ZONING DIVISION COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING SECTION November 4, 2021 PETITION PL20200000115 GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN AMENDMENT [TRANSMITTAL HEARING] FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT PROPERTY OWNERS/APPLICANT/AGENT: Owners/Applicant : Agent: David E Torres, Mgr. Robert Mulhere, FAICP 3805 TLW, LLC & Lord's Way Apartments, LLC Hole Montes Inc. 7742 Alico Road 950 Encore Way Naples, FL 33912 Naples, FL 34110 Richard D. Yovanovich, Esq. Coleman, Yovanovich & Koester, P.A. 4001 Tamiami Trail North Suite 300 Naples, FL 34103 GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION The subject property is located on the northeast corner of the intersection of Collier Boulevard and The Lord's Way in Section 14, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, consisting of 69± acres. See maps below. — 1 — PL20200000115 Collier Boulevard Lord's Way Mixed Use Subdistrict — FLUE Packet Pg. 289 Zoning: CFPUa1� HACIENDA LAKES FIRSTASSY. I PLESLAKES MIN ST.EDU, '-MUTRY CLUIJ REHAB. ,- -Milano�71.: akes y - R: 26 p ;.: : 14rl '. r 3 wL.r- -,� L-al*g;g.LV .. - ;Zoning: P1�6 , " S Zoning: A ++ i i Mil n ~ A6etter9AY ri 4 Zoning: CPUD k e� �H ana ,k�ammc g: RI WAN Rill 9.C.1 REQUESTED ACTION This petition seeks to amend the Collier Boulevard Community Facility Subdistrict of the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) to the Collier Boulevard Lord's Way Mixed Use Subdistrict to increase the maximum dwelling units from 306 to 690; to maintain the communication tower use; and to remove churches and childcare facilities as allowed uses. The large GMPA resolution also requests the Board to transmit the amendment to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity. The proposed amended Future Land Use Element, Collier Boulevard Lord's Way Mixed Use Subdistrict text is as follows: (Single underline test is added, single strike -through text is deleted, and is also reflected in the Ordinance Exhibit A). TABLE OF CONTENTS Page SUMMARY 1 I. OVERVIEW 2 A. PURPOSE 2 EXHIBIT A COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT *** *** *** *** *** Text Break *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** Text Break *** *** *** *** *** II. IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY 10 GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES 10 FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION DESCRIPTION SECTION Urban Designation *** *** *** *** *** Text Break *** *** *** *** *** FUTURE LAND USE MAP SERIES 140 *Future Land Use Map *Mixed User & Interchange Activity Centers Maps *** *** *** *** *** Text Break *** *** *** *** *** * Corkscrew Island Neighborhood Commercial Subdistrict Map —3— PL20200000115 Collier Boulevard Lord's Way Mixed Use Subdistrict — FLUE Packet Pg. 291 9.C.1 * Collier Boulevard Community Facility Lord's Way Mixed Use Subdistrict Map * Orange Blossom/Airport Crossroads Commercial Subdistrict Map * Coastal High Hazard Area Map * Coastal High Hazard Area Comparison Map * Gordon River Greenway Conservation Area Designation Map * Hibiscus Residential Infill Subdistrict Map * Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict Map * Davis — Radio Commercial Subdistrict Map * Logan Boulevard/Immokalee Road Commercial Infill Subdistrict Map * Mini Triangle Mixed Use Subdistrict Map * East Tamiami Trail Commercial Infill Subdistrict Map * Vanderbilt Beach Commercial Tourist Subdistrict Map * Meridian Village Mixed -Use Subdistrict Map * Germain Immokalee Commercial Subdistrict Map * Greenway — Tamiami Trail East Commercial Subdistrict Map * Bay House Campus Commercial Subdistrict Map * Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed Use Subdistrict Map *** *** *** *** *** Text Break *** *** *** *** *** II. IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES GOAL: TO GUIDE LAND USE DECISION -MAKING SOASTOACHIEVEAND MAINTAINAHIGH QUALITY NATURAL AND HUMAN ENVIRONMENT WITH A WELL -PLANNED MIX OF COMPATIBLE LAND USES WHICH PROMOTE THE PUBLIC'S HEALTH, SAFETY AND WELFARE CONSISTENT WITH STATE PLANNING REQUIREMENTS AND LOCAL DESIRES. *** *** *** *** *** Text Break *** *** *** *** *** A. URBAN - MIXED USE DISTRICT 1. Urban Residential Subdistrict 2. Urban Residential Fringe Subdistrict *** *** *** *** *** Text Break *** *** *** *** *** 15. Vanderbilt Beach Road Neighborhood Commercial Subdistrict 16. Collier Boulevard Gern ,-,u nity Facility Lord's Way Mixed Use Subdistrict 17. Hibiscus Residential Infill Subdistrict —4— PL20200000115 Collier Boulevard Lord's Way Mixed Use Subdistrict — FLUE Packet Pg. 292 9.C.1 18. Vincentian Mixed -Use Subdistrict 19. [RESERVED] 20. Goodlette/Pine Ridge Mixed Use Subdistrict 21. Livingston Road/Veterans Memorial Boulevard East Residential Subdistrict 22. Meridian Village Mixed -Use Subdistrict 23. Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed Use Subdistrict *** *** *** *** *** Text Break *** *** *** *** *** FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION DESCRIPTION SECTION The following section describes the land use designations shown on the Future Land Use Map. These designations generally indicate the types of land uses for which zoning may be requested. However, these land use designations do not guarantee that a zoning request will be approved. Requests may be denied by the Board of County Commissioners based on criteria in the Land Development Code or on special studies completed for the County. I. URBAN DESIGNATION *** *** *** *** *** Text Break *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** Text Break *** *** *** *** *** A. Urban Mixed -Use District This District, which represents approximately 116,000 acres, is intended to accommodate a variety of residential and non-residential land uses, including mixed -use developments such as Planned Unit Developments. Certain industrial and commercial uses are also allowed subject to criteria. *** *** *** *** *** Text Break *** *** *** *** *** 16. Collier Boulevard Community caGiiit y Lord's Way Mixed Use Subdistrict The Collier Boulevard Community FaGilif., Lord's Way Mixed Use Subdistrict comprises approximately 69 acres and is located on the east side of Collier Boulevard, approximately one- half mile north of the Collier Boulevard/Rattlesnake Hammock Road intersection. The purpose of this Subdistrict is to provide nnmmi snit y fanili4 y a mix of uses primarily instit tienal residential uses and ether neR GernmerGial uses generally serving the publiG at large, and residential , both affordable and market rate housing, all in a setting to be compatible with surrounding land uses. serving the needs of the Gemmi snit y of large —5— PL20200000115 Collier Boulevard Lord's Way Mixed Use Subdistrict — FLUE Packet Pg. 293 9.C.1 All development in this Subdistrict shall comply with the following requirements and limitations: a. Rezoning is encouraged to be in the form of a PUD. b. Allowable land uses: 1) COMM„nity faGilitiesSuGh as Ghurc#e?,—gGroup housing uses such as nursing homes, independent care units, and assisted living and continuing care facilities. cemeteries, private s Gheels and Golleges 2) Child Gore faGilities 32) Residential dwelling units, not to exceed -306 690 units. 43) Essential services, as defined in the Collier County Land Development Code, Ordinance Number 04-41, in effect as of the effective date of adoption of this Subdistrict. 64) Parks, open space, and recreational uses. this S bdiStGin+ GonStRlGtien ef aRy housing RGt reserved fGF GhlJFGh related employees, staff and pregranq pregram e. A requirement shall be put on plaGe at the time Of FeZE)RiRgiPIJD amendment that all but none and shall be removed as they are replaGed by pelrmalReRt residential GtF6lGtlJFeSor withiR twenty four (24) menths frern the date of adopt' 0 permanent adult Gare units, of this S bdistrint whiGhever is sooner o f—c. One hundred forty-seven of the 296 affordable and market rate housing units in Tract G of the Collier Boulevard/Lord's Way MPUD, as they become available, will be offered first to persons involved in providing essential services in Collier County, as defined in the County's Local Housing Assistance Plan. g—d. To achieve the density of approximately n 28 dwelling „nits per oGre 296 dwelling units on Tract G of the Collier Boulevard/Lord's Way MPUD,-e,;,dt- allow develepment of the 192non Ghi FGh_related non base density dwelling � ini+s' the project shall comply with one or more of the following: 1) The Affordable Housing Density Bonus provisions of the Collier County Land Development Code, Ordinance Number 04-41 in effect as of the date of adoption of this Subdistrict; or, 2) be designated as a Community Workforce Housing Innovation Program (CWHIP) Project by the State of Florida and comply with all requirements and limitations of that designation, and provide a minimum of eighty (80) essential services personnel dwelling units comprised of a minimum of ten (10) dwelling units for those earning less than 80% of the median income of Collier County, and a minimum of seventy (70) dwelling units for those earning between 80% and 140% of the median income of Collier County; or, -6- PL20200000115 Collier Boulevard Lord's Way Mixed Use Subdistrict - FLUE Packet Pg. 294 9.C.1 3) enter into an agreement with Collier County assuring that no fewer than 147 affordable and market rate housing units are constructed and, as they become available, will be offered first to persons involved in providing essential services in Collier County, such agreement being in effect for not less than fifteen (15) years, including a minimum of thirty-five (35) dwelling units for those earning no more than 140% of the median income of Collier County, and a minimum of twenty- five (25) dwelling units for those earning no more than 80% of the median income. I-. e. No more than 57 market rate dwelling units shall be constructed prior to the construction of all affordable housing dwelling units. f. At the time of rezoning/PUD amendment, the maximum occupancy per dwelling unit in the 296 non _GhUrGh_related dwelling „ shall be addressed, as deemed appropriate by the Board of County Commissioners. j g_At the time of rezoning/PUD amendment, consideration shall be given to increasing the landscaping requirements along The Lord's Way beyond existing Land Development Code requirements. At the time of rezoning/PUD amendment, the petitioner shall be required to mitigate for the project's impacts upon affected roadways in accordance with the concurrency management system and as otherwise determined appropriate by the Board of County Commissioners. k. ResmdeRtial developmeRt shall be phased. Phase GRe developmeRt is limited te 147 dweliffiRg the 149 market rate dwelliRg URitS OR Phase Twe, RE) GeFtifiGate ef QGG6lpaRGy shall be issued 6141 i rnpreyerneRtS to the exit+iRg definieRt segFneRt of Davis Be uleyard are GGFnplete PURPOSE AND DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT The Future Land Use Element was first amended in December 2007 via Ordinance No. 2007-79 to create the Collier Boulevard Community Facility Subdistrict. The acreage is proposed to remain the same at 69± acres. Currently there are 306 dwelling units built and they consist of both affordable -workforce and market rate housing. No new land uses will be added to this project beyond the previously approved uses, but instead several land uses will be removed (church uses, cemeteries, private schools and colleges, childcare, and commercial uses). The applicant is maintaining language for Group housing uses such as nursing homes, independent care units, and assisted living and continuing care facilities. Should the applicant wish to continue an interim use for the church until such time as the Site Development Plan is approved for development within Tract A or 5 years from the date of approval of this Ordinance, whichever occurs first; staff has included some suggested text that could be included (in the recommendation of the GMP Amendment). The applicant will also continue the existing use for a communications tower. The currently proposed large scale GMP amendment seeks to amend the Collier Boulevard Community Facility Subdistrict to create the Collier Boulevard Lord's Way Mixed Use Subdistrict, a mostly residential project. The proposed amendment will allow for a large increase of the maximum dwelling units from 306 (gross density of 4.43 dwelling units per acre) to 690 dwelling units (which would be a gross density of 10 dwelling units per acre). Out of the additional 384 (690-306) dwelling units being requested, no additional affordable -workforce housing is proposed. —7— PL20200000115 Collier Boulevard Lord's Way Mixed Use Subdistrict — FLUE Packet Pg. 295 9.C.1 EXISTING CONDITIONS: Subject Property: The subject property is designated Urban, Urban Mixed -Use District, Collier Boulevard Community Facility Subdistrict with the underlying designation of Urban Residential Fringe Subdistrict. It is partially developed with 306 DUs (apartments for rental) and community facilities such as a church. The 306 dwelling units include 10 units reserved for occupancy solely by church employees and church -related dwelling units will be considered incidental and accessory to the institutional uses within this Subdistrict. The subject property also has an existing essential services land use, a communications tower. There is also a portion of the subject property that is wooded. The property also has recreational open space. Surrounding Lands: North: Future Land Use Element Designation is Urban, Urban Mixed -Use District, Urban Residential Fringe Subdistrict; Zoned; Agricultural. To the north of the parcel directly adjoining, the land north is designated Urban, Urban Mixed -Use District, Urban Residential Fringe Subdistrict; Zoned; Hacienda Lakes MPUD. East: Future Land Use Element Designation; the land east is designated Urban, Urban Mixed - Use District, Urban Residential Fringe Subdistrict; Zoned; Hacienda Lakes MPUD. South: Directly to the south is The Lord's Way road. Further to the south is Future Land Use Element Designation; Urban, Urban Mixed -Use District, Urban Residential Fringe Subdistrict; Zoned; Agricultural and also Lord's Way 30 Acre RPUD (single family homes). West: Directly to the West is Collier Boulevard. Further to the west is Future Land Use Element Designation; Urban, Urban Mixed -Use District, Urban Residential Subdistrict; and Zoned Naples Lakes Country Club (residential condominiums). In summary, the existing and planned land uses in the larger surrounding area are primarily low - density single and multi -family residences and undeveloped or agricultural parcels. STAFF ANALYSIS: Background and Considerations: The Future Land Use Element was amended in December 2007 via Ordinance No. 2007-79 to create the Collier Boulevard Community Facility Subdistrict. The subject site (Collier Boulevard Community Facility Subdistrict consists of 69± acres and is designated in the Future Land Use Element as Urban, Urban Mixed -Use District, Urban Residential Fringe Subdistrict and zoned as First Assembly Ministries Education & Rehabilitation Campus (PUDA). The 2007 subdistrict was approved for a total of 306 dwelling units at a density of (306 DUs / 69 acres= 4.43 DUs/Acre. For those specific properties identified within the Urban Residential Fringe Subdistrict, this density bonus is allowed but only to a maximum of six (6) residential units per gross acre. The density was allowed to be significantly increased in the Urban Residential Fringe Subdistrict due to the use of one or more of the Affordable Housing Density Bonus provisions of the Collier County Land Development Code as follows: 1) The Affordable Housing Density Bonus provisions of the Collier County Land Development Code, Ordinance Number 04-41 in effect as of the date of adoption of this Subdistrict; or, —8— PL20200000115 Collier Boulevard Lord's Way Mixed Use Subdistrict — FLUE Packet Pg. 296 9.C.1 2) be designated as a Community Workforce Housing Innovation Program (CWHIP) Project by the State of Florida and comply with all requirements and limitations of that designation, and provide a minimum of eighty (80) essential services personnel dwelling units comprised of a minimum of ten (10) dwelling units for those earning less than 80% of the median income of Collier County, and a minimum of seventy (70) dwelling units for those earning between 80% and 140% of the median income of Collier County; or, 3) enter into an agreement with Collier County assuring that no fewer than 147 affordable and market rate housing units are constructed and, as they become available, will be offered first to persons involved in providing essential services in Collier County, such agreement being in effect for not less than fifteen (15) years, including a minimum of thirty-five (35) dwelling units for those earning no more than 140% of the median income of Collier County, and a minimum of twenty- five (25) dwelling units for those earning no more than 80% of the median income. However, the subject site did not achieve the full Affordable Housing Density Bonus of 6 DUs / acre discussed in the FLUE, because the applicant requested 57 market rate DUs. The 2007 subdistrict also had the following restriction applied of no more than 57 market rate dwelling units shall be constructed prior to the construction of all affordable housing dwelling units. The 2021 request (PL20200000115) to create a new mostly residential uses subdistrict, adding 384 dwelling units to the 69± acre site provides insufficient public benefit to support the proposed amendment. A site with 690 DUs on 69 acres calculates to a total density of 10 DUs per acre. This density is inconsistent with the Future Land Use Element as stated above - the maximum gross density has already been achieved with the Affordable Housing Density Bonus for 4.43 DUs/acre. Compatibility: The subject site's residential use is a similar use to the surrounding area's land uses; however, the proposed gross density of 10± DUs / acre is not consistent with the surrounding PUDs which have a lower approved residential density. Naples Lakes is approved for 1.56 DUs/acre Hacienda Lakes is approved for 0.78 DUs/acre Sierra Meadows is approved for 5.27 DUs/acre — in Activity Center and Density band Hammock Park is approved for 13.85 DUs/acre — in Activity Center There are two proposed sites with multi -family for sale or apartments with no affordable or workforce housing: Amerisite is requesting 303 DUs or 16DUs/acre Carman Drive is requesting 13.8 DUs/acre Justifications for Proposed Amendment: The submitted Narrative and Justification document dated 2-12-21 was not updated to address the final proposed amendment. There was no submitted explanation of why the gross density should be approximately 10 DUs/acre. —9— PL20200000115 Collier Boulevard Lord's Way Mixed Use Subdistrict — FLUE Packet Pg. 297 9.C.1 Identification and Analysis of the Pertinent Large Scale Compehensive Plan Amendment Criteria in Florida Statutesw Chapter 163.3187 Criteria for GMP Amendments in Florida Statutes Data and analysis requirements for comprehensive plans and plan amendments are noted in Chapter 163, F.S., specifically as listed below. Section 163.3177(1)(f). Florida Statutes: (f) All mandatory and optional elements of the comprehensive plan and plan amendments shall be based upon relevant and appropriate data and an analysis by the local government that may include, but not be limited to, surveys, studies, community goals and vision, and other data available at the time of adoption of the comprehensive plan or plan amendment. To be based on data means to react to it in an appropriate way and to the extent necessary indicated by the data available on that particular subject at the time of adoption of the plan or plan amendment at issue. 1. Surveys, studies, and data utilized in the preparation of the comprehensive plan may not be deemed a part of the comprehensive plan unless adopted as a part of it. Copies of such studies, surveys, data, and supporting documents for proposed plans and plan amendments shall be made available for public inspection, and copies of such plans shall be made available to the public upon payment of reasonable charges for reproduction. Support data or summaries are not subject to the compliance review process, but the comprehensive plan must be clearly based on appropriate data. Support data or summaries may be used to aid in the determination of compliance and consistency. 2. Data must be taken from professionally accepted sources. The application of a methodology utilized in data collection or whether a particular methodology is professionally accepted may be evaluated. However, the evaluation may not include whether one accepted methodology is better than another. Original data collection by local governments is not required. However, local governments may use original data so long as methodologies are professionally accepted. 3. The comprehensive plan shall be based upon permanent and seasonal population estimates and projections, which shall either be those published by the Office of Economic and Demographic Research or generated by the local government based upon a professionally acceptable methodology. The plan must be based on at least the minimum amount of land required to accommodate the medium projections as published by the Office of Economic and Demographic Research for at least a 10-year planning period unless otherwise limited under s. 380.05, including related rules of the Administration Commission. Absent physical limitations on population growth, population projections for each municipality, and the unincorporated area within a county must, at a minimum, be reflective of each area's proportional share of the total county population and the total county population growth. Section 163.3177(6)(a)2. Florida Statutes: 2. The future land use plan and plan amendments shall be based upon surveys, studies, and data regarding the area, as applicable, including: a. The amount of land required to accommodate anticipated growth. —10— PL20200000115 Collier Boulevard Lord's Way Mixed Use Subdistrict — FLUE Packet Pg. 298 9.C.1 b. The projected permanent and seasonal population of the area. c. The character of undeveloped land. d. The availability of water supplies, public facilities, and services. e. The need for redevelopment, including the renewal of blighted areas and the elimination of nonconforming uses which are inconsistent with the character of the community. f. The compatibility of uses on lands adjacent to or closely proximate to military installations. g. The compatibility of uses on lands adjacent to an airport as defined in s. 330.35 and consistent with s. 333.02. h. The discouragement of urban sprawl. The need for job creation, capital investment, and economic development that will strengthen and diversify the community's economy. j. The need to modify land uses and development patterns within antiquated subdivisions Section 163.3177(6)(a)8., Florida Statutes: (a) A future land use plan element designating proposed future general distribution, location, and extent of the uses of land for residential uses, commercial uses, industry, agriculture, recreation, conservation, education, public facilities, and other categories of the public and private uses of land. The approximate acreage and the general range of density or intensity of use shall be provided for the gross land area included in each existing land use category. The element shall establish the long-term end toward which land use programs and activities are ultimately directed. 8. Future land use map amendments shall be based upon the following analyses: a. An analysis of the availability of facilities and services. b. An analysis of the suitability of the plan amendment for its proposed use considering the character of the undeveloped land, soils, topography, natural resources, and historic resources on site. c. An analysis of the minimum amount of land needed to achieve the goals and requirements of this section. It is incumbent upon the petitioner to provide appropriate and relevant data and analysis to address the statutory requirements for a Plan amendment, then present and defend, as necessary, that data and analysis Environmental Impacts and Historical and Archaeological Impacts: Jaime Cook approved the project and stated "CCME Policies addressed in Exhibit V. D1 Narrative and Justification. No impacts to preserve. Jaime Cook 01/07/2021" Public Facilities Impacts: Eric Fey, Principal Project Manager for Public Utilities, approved the application after receiving a revised document Public Utilities Report (Exhibit VE1) addressing revised uses. Approved in CityView on 6-21-2021. — 11 — PL20200000115 Collier Boulevard Lord's Way Mixed Use Subdistrict — FLUE Packet Pg. 299 9.C.1 Transportation Impacts: Traffic Capacity/Traffic Circulation Impact Analysis. Transportation Element Consistency Determination: A Transportation Impact Statement (TIS) prepared by Trebilcock Planning and Engineering was submitted as part of this petition. Transportation Planning staff reviewed the TIS and the petition for consistency with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the Growth Management Plan using the current 2020 AUIR. Staff finds the TIS to be sufficient and have no objections to the Transmittal of this GMPA petition. Approved by Michael Sawyer; Project Manager, Capital Projects Planning, Impact Fees, Program Management on 3-16-21. Community and Human Services: Jacob LaRow, Manager— Housing, Grant Development and Operations, reviewed the proposed amendment and recommended the following text additions to the Subdistrict amendment (Exhibit A): (4) enter into an Affordable Housing Density Bonus Agreement under Chapter 2.06.00 of the Land Development Code of Collier County for 384 dwelling units and making available the requisite number of affordable units to achieve the overall Subdistrict density of 10 DUs per acre. NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING (NIM) SYNOPSIS: The Neighborhood Information Meeting was duly advertised and held on Wednesday May 5, 2021, at 5:30 PM at the New Hope Ministries, Event Center, Lecture Hall — Room 211, 7675 Davis Blvd., Naples, FL 34104. The NIM was held for both a large scale GMPA — Collier Blvd. Lord's Way Mixed Use Subdistrict (PL20200000115) and a zoning companion Collier Blvd. Lord's Way PUDA (PL20200000114). Mr. Bob Mulhere presented all consultant staff and County staff. Five members of the public attended. He explained the NIM process and a history and overview of the project. Question and answer period followed. Questions concerned transportation/roadways that are planned for extensions to Rattlesnake and Lord's Way to Benfield Rd. With the removal of some of the Community Facilities uses, traffic volume is expected to decrease. David Torres indicated he intended to develop a multi -family for sale product. A statement was also made that the church will be used an interim use until the proposed multi -family residential begins. Meeting adjourned at 5:55 PM. PUBLIC CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED BY STAFF: No correspondence was received. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS: The reason for this GMPA (and for a companion PUDA zoning petition that will be presented for adoption at a public hearing at a later time) is to allow up to 384 dwelling units in addition to the existing 306 dwelling units for a total of 690 dwelling units. The applicant is also proposing removing some community facility uses and commercial uses by creating a new subdistrict. Collier County Public Utilities will provide water service for potable and fire protection needs, a as well as wastewater service. The subject property is within the South Service Area. Collier —12— PL20200000115 Collier Boulevard Lord's Way Mixed Use Subdistrict — FLUE Packet Pg. 300 9.C.1 County Public Utilities has sufficient capacity to provide water and sewer. Public Utilities staff approved the project 6-21-2021. • Transportation planning staff approved the project 3-16-21. • Environmental Impacts and Historical and Archaeological Impacts staff approved the project 1-7-2021. • The applicant is proposing insufficient public benefit. • The requested density of 10± DUs per acre is inconsistent with the Future Land Use Element of the Growth Management Plan. LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: This Staff Report was reviewed by the County Attorney's Office on October 14, 2021. The criteria for GMP amendments to the Future Land Use Element and map series are in Sections 163.3177(1)(f) and 163.3177(6)(a)2. and 163.3177(6)(a)8., Florida Statutes. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends not supporting the proposed amendment. Staff could support the request if the affordable housing bonus was targeted to income levels more in line with the existing affordable housing density bonus. Should the Planning Commission wish to recommend adding text for the interim use of the church, please see the suggested text below: Vill. INTERIM USE Religious organizations (Group 8661. Limited to churches and religious organizations) shall be permitted to continue within Tract A for a time not to exceed 5 years from the date of approval of this Ordinance or until such time that a Site Development Plan has been approved for the development of residential units within Tract A, whichever occurs first. After five years from the date of approval of this Ordinance, or when a SDP has been approved for the residential development within Tract A, the identified religious organization use shall cease and is no longer deemed permitted. Further, if the structure of the religious organization is to be destroyed by any means to an extent of more than 50% of its replacement cost at time of destruction, it shall not be reconstructed. Prepared by Sue Faulkner, Principal Planner, Comprehensive Planning Section, Zoning Division —13— PL20200000115 Collier Boulevard Lord's Way Mixed Use Subdistrict — FLUE Packet Pg. 301 9.C.1 r U LL r E E 0 U m L O U LO 0 0 0 0 0 N 0 N J d C N E C N E a a 2 LO 0 0 N N r O 0. N L m U) Y) E L 0 J m L O U c m E t v O r r Q —14— PL20200000115 Collier Boulevard Lord's Way Mixed Use Subdistrict — FLUE Packet Pg. 302 9.C.2 RESOLUTION NO. 2021- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA PROPOSING AMENDMENT TO ORDINANCE NO. 89-05, AS AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, SPECIFICALLY AMENDING THE FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT TO CHANGE THE MIXED USE DISTRICT, COLLIER BOULEVARD COMMUNITY FACILITY SUBDISTRICT TO THE MIXED USE DISTRICT, COLLIER BOULEVARD LORD'S WAY MIXED USE SUBDISTRICT; TO INCREASE THE MAXIMUM DWELLING UNITS FROM 306 TO 690 WITH SOME AFFORDABLE HOUSING; TO REMOVE CHILD CARE FACILITIES AS AN ALLOWED USE AND ALLOW THE CHURCH TO CONTINUE AS AN INTERIM USE FOR UP TO 5 YEARS; AND FURTHERMORE DIRECTING TRANSMITTAL OF THE AMENDMENT TO THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE INTERSECTION OF COLLIER BOULEVARD AND HACIENDA LAKES PARKWAY FORMERLY KNOWN AS LORD'S WAY IN SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, CONSISTING OF 69f ACRES. [PL202000001151 WHEREAS, Collier County, pursuant to Section 163.3161, et. sea., Florida Statutes, the Florida Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act, was required to prepare and adopt a comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS, the Collier County Board of County Commissioners adopted the Collier County Growth Management Plan on January 10, 1989; and WHEREAS, the Community Planning Act of 2011 provides authority for local governments to amend their respective comprehensive plans and outlines certain procedures to amend adopted comprehensive plans; and WHEREAS, Lords Way Apartments LLC and 3805 TLW, LLC requested an amendment to the Future Land Use Element of the Growth Management Plan; and WHEREAS, on November 4, 2021, the Collier County Planning Commission considered the proposed amendment to the Growth Management Plan pursuant to the authority granted to it by Section 163.3174, F.S., and has recommended approval of said amendment to the Board of County Commissioners; and [20-CMP-0 1084/1684773/ 11 184 Collier Blvd Comm Facility / PL20200000115 12/01/21 Page 1 of 2 Ln 0 0 N Words underlined are added, words sWuek through have been deleted. Packet Pg. 303 9.C.2 WHEREAS, on , the Board of County Commissioners at a public hearing approved the transmittal of the proposed amendment to the state land planning agency in accordance with Section 163.3184, F.S.; and WHEREAS, upon receipt of Collier County's proposed Growth Management Plan Amendment, various State agencies and the Department of Economic Opportunity (DEO) have thirty (30) days to review the proposed amendment and DEO must transmit, in writing, to Collier County its comments within said thirty (30) days pursuant to Section 163.3184, F.S.; and WHEREAS, Collier County, upon receipt of the written comments from DEO must adopt, adopt with changes or not adopt the proposed Growth Management Plan Amendment within one hundred and eighty (180) days of such receipt pursuant to Section 163.3184, F.S.; and WHEREAS, the DEO, within five (5) days of receipt of Collier County's adopted Growth Management Plan Amendment, must notify the County of any deficiencies of the Plan Amendment pursuant to Section 163.3184(3), F.S. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA that: The Board of County Commissioners hereby approves the proposed Growth Management Plan Amendment, attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated by reference herein, for the purpose of transmittal to the Department of Economic Opportunity and other reviewing agencies thereby initiating the required State evaluation of the Growth Management Plan Amendment prior to final adoption. THIS RESOLUTION ADOPTED after motion, second and majority this day of a , 2021. a ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 0 CRYSTAL K. KINZEL, CLERK COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA Ln By: Deputy Clerk Penny Taylor, Chairman Approved as to form and legality: Heidi Ashton-Cicko Managing Assistant County Attorney Attachment: Exhibit A — Proposed Text Amendment [20-CMP-01084/1684773/1] 184 Collier Blvd Comm Facility / PL20200000115 12/01/21 Words underlined are added, words swaek through have been deleted. Page 2 of 2 Packet Pg. 304 Collier Boulevard Lord's Way Mixed Use Subdistrict 12-01-2021 Exhibit A COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT *** *** *** *** *** Text Break *** *** *** *** *** TABLE OF CONTENTS Page SUMMARY I I. OVERVIEW 2 A. PURPOSE 2 *** *** *** *** *** Text Break *** *** *** *** *** II. IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY 09 GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES 09 FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION DESCRIPTION SECTION 26 Urban Designation *** *** *** *** *** Text Break *** *** *** *** *** FUTURE LAND USE MAP SERIES 154 *Future Land Use Map *Mixed User & Interchange Activity Centers Maps *** *** *** *** *** Text Break *** *** *** *** *** * Corkscrew Island Neighborhood Commercial Subdistrict Map * Collier Boulevard Gene ,unity Faei t'� Lord's Way Mixed Use Subdistrict Map * Orange Blossom/Airport Crossroads Commercial Subdistrict Map * Coastal High Hazard Area Map * Coastal High Hazard Area Comparison Map * Gordon River Greenway Conservation Area Designation Map * Hibiscus Residential Infill Subdistrict Map * Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict Map * Davis — Radio Commercial Subdistrict Map * Logan Boulevard/Immokalee Road Commercial Infill Subdistrict Map * Mini Triangle Mixed Use Subdistrict Map * East Tamiami Trail Commercial Infill Subdistrict Map * Vanderbilt Beach Commercial Tourist Subdistrict Map Page 1 of 7 a Packet Pg. 305 Collier Boulevard Lord's Way Mixed Use Subdistrict 12-01-2021 9.C.2 * Meridian Village Mixed -Use Subdistrict Map * Germain Immokalee Commercial Subdistrict Map * Greenway — Tamiami Trail East Commercial Subdistrict Map * Bay House Campus Commercial Subdistrict Map * Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed Use Subdistrict Map *** *** *** *** *** Text Break *** *** *** *** *** II. IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES GOAL: TO GUIDE LAND USE DECISION -MAKING SO AS TO ACHIEVE AND MAINTAIN A HIGH QUALITY NATURAL AND HUMAN ENVIRONMENT WITH A WELL -PLANNED MIX OF COMPATIBLE LAND USES WHICH PROMOTE THE PUBLIC'S HEALTH, SAFETY AND WELFARE CONSISTENT WITH STATE PLANNING REQUIREMENTS AND LOCAL DESIRES. *** *** *** *** *** A. URBAN - MIXED USE DISTRICT Text Break *** *** *** *** *** 1. Urban Residential Subdistrict 2. Urban Residential Fringe Subdistrict *** *** *** *** *** Text Break *** *** *** *** *** 15. Vanderbilt Beach Road Neighborhood Commercial Subdistrict 16. Collier Boulevard Community Faeilky Lord's Way Mixed Use Subdistrict 17. Hibiscus Residential Infill Subdistrict 18. Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict 19. [RESERVED] 20. Goodlette/Pine Ridge Mixed Use Subdistrict 21. Livingston Road/Veterans Memorial Boulevard East Residential Subdistrict 22. Meridian Village Mixed -Use Subdistrict 23. Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed Use Subdistrict *** *** *** *** *** Text Break * * * *** *** *** *** FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION DESCRIPTION SECTION The following section describes the land use designations shown on the Future Land Use Map. a These designations generally indicate the types of land uses for which zoning may be requested. However, these land use designations do not guarantee that a zoning request will be approved. Requests may be denied by the Board of County Commissioners based on criteria in the Land Development Code or on special studies completed for the County. Page 2 of 7 Packet Pg. 306 Collier Boulevard Lord's Way Mixed Use Subdistrict 12-01-2021 9.C.2 I. URBAN DESIGNATION *** *** *** *** *** Text Break *** A. Urban Mixed Use District *** *** *** *** This District, which represents approximately 116,000 acres, is intended to accommodate a variety of residential and non-residential land uses, including mixed -use developments such as Planned Unit Developments. Certain industrial and commercial uses are also allowed subject to criteria. *** *** *** *** *** Text Break *** *** *** *** *** 16. Collier Boulevard ^mu„i+• Fa^fli')= Lord's Way Mixed Use Subdistrict The Collier Boulevard Cemm• Lord's Way Mixed Use Subdistrict comprises approximately 69 acres and is located on the east side of Collier Boulevard, approximately one-half mile north of the Collier Boulevard/Rattlesnake Hammock Road intersection. The purpose of this Subdistrict is to provide eemmunity f edity a mix of ,;insfitu&n-residential uses and uses, both affordable and market rate housing, all in a setting to be compatible with surrounding land uses. The Subdisis intended to eenWn a fnix ef uses and serviees in a self suffleient effvir-efffnent, whieh lessens tfaffie All development in this Subdistrict shall comply with the following requirements and limitations: a. Rezoning is encouraged to be in the form of a PUD. c� b. Allowable land uses: M O 1) Cv ttn t•, f eili e ^''Group housing uses such as nursing N ,.�., homes independent care units and assisted living and continuing care facilities. r N o vtefies,p aw and heels ,neelleges T O 32) Residential dwelling units, not to exceed 3-06 690 units. 43) Essential services, as defined in the Collier County Land Development Code, Ordinance Number 04-41, in effect as of the effective date of adoption of this Subdistrict. 54) Parks, open space, and recreational uses. 5) Religious organizations (Group 8661 Limited to churches and religious organizations) shall be permitted to continue within Tract A for a time not to exceed Page 3 of 7 Packet Pg. 307 Collier Boulevard Lord's Way Mixed Use Subdistrict 12-01-2021 9.C.2 5 years from the date of approval of this Ordinance or until such time that a Site Development Plan has been approved for the development of residential units within Tract A, whichever occurs first. After five years from the date of approval of this Ordinance, or when a SDP has been approved for the residential development within Tract A, the identified reli io�g-anization use shall cease and is no longer deemed permitted. Further, if the structure of the religious organization is to be destroyed by any means to an extent of more than 50% of its replacement cost at time of destruction, it shall not be reconstructed. • !Esr !�e!!�E'�..Fr.��r�\��:e!!�!e�!tiszsri!esri • ZLLIA i c. One hundred forty-seven of the 296 affordable and market rate housing units in Tract G of the Collier Boulevard/Lord's Way MPUD, as they become available, will be offered first to persons involved in providing essential services in Collier County, as defined in the c� County's Local Housing Assistance Plan. c to 0 g d. To achieve the density of approximately 4.28 dwelling tmits per a 296 dwelling units on Tract G of the Collier Boulevard/Lord's Way MPUD, and te allow development of theN , the project shall comply with one N or more of the following: 1) The Affordable Housing Density Bonus provisions of the Collier County Land Development Code, Ordinance Number 04-41 in effect as of the date of adoption of this Subdistrict; or, 2) be designated as a Community Workforce Housing Innovation Program (CWHIP) Project by the State of Florida and comply with all requirements and limitations of that designation, and provide a minimum of eighty (80) essential services personnel dwelling units — comprised of a minimum of ten (10) dwelling units for those earning less than 80% of the median income of Collier County, and a minimum of seventy Page 4 of 7 Packet Pg. 308 Collier Boulevard Lord's Way Mixed Use Subdistrict 12-01-2021 9.C.2 (70) dwelling units for those earning between 80% and 140% of the median income of Collier County; or, 3) enter into an agreement with Collier County assuring that no fewer than 147 affordable and market rate housing units are constructed and, as they become available, will be offered first to persons involved in providing essential services in Collier County, such agreement being in effect for not less than fifteen (15) years, including a minimum of thirty-five (35) dwelling units for those earning no more than 150% of the median income of Collier County, and a minimum of twenty-five (25) dwelling units for those earning no more than 80% of the median income. h: e. No more than 57 market rate dwelling units shall be constructed prior to the construction of all affordable housing dwelling units. f. At the time of rezoning/PUD amendment, the maximum occupancy per dwelling unit in the 296 non ehtweh related dwelling shall be addressed, as deemed appropriate by the Board of County Commissioners. j. g_At the time of rezoning/PUD amendment, consideration shall be given to increasing the landscaping requirements along The Lord's Way beyond existing Land Development Code requirements. k-. h. At the time of rezoning/PUD amendment, the petitioner shall be required to mitigate for the project's impacts upon affected roadways in accordance with the concurrency management system and as otherwise determined appropriate by the Board of County Commissioners. • Page 5 of 7 Packet Pg. 309 EXHIBIT A PL2020� Off`/w �F� COLLIER BLVD./LORD'S WAY MIXED USE SUBDISTRICT COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA u L--� —LIDO-ISLES— WILLOW RUN HOMES OF ISLAN_ DIA FF Clubl Estate's DR SUBJECT LASIP CONSERVATION AREA SITE m — W�p9e_ - ---- - - CC 1•� t INgy - � lJ IV� Z °< ales Proposed new Ca, y R subdistrict name is FIRSTASSY. MINST. EDU. & REHAB. Collier Boulevard Dellverance,ST J Lord's Way Subdistrict JLD m p� — The Lords WAY v HACIENDA LAKES U NAPL'ES LAKES"COUNTJRYCLUB v B � � a � W co E y Q =� [� A Better WAY li v MCMULLEN Prestwick DR Rattlesnake=Hammock-RD Q _m Sierra Meadows BLVD ! f° ADOPTED - XXXX, XXXX 0 250 500 1,000 Feet (Ord. No. )CXXX-X) PREPARED BY: BETH YANG, AICP GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPT. FILE:COLLIER BLVD LORDS WAY MIXED USE SUBDISTRICT SITE LOCATION MAP.MXD DATE: SEP. S0, 2021 L 0 co 0 N O N r c 0 0 to m r c d E z 0 R a LEGEND MICollier BLVD./Lord's Way Mixed Use Subdistrict Packet Pg. 310 Page 6 of 7 a z 0 r w a Q H W m RNRf F u �R �R wfr El i 'g'g wg w£N3 �v 9;�£ 00 1011 011L, I 00®1010 L Y g g S 2' 10 s 3 g 3 3# fi3 S b b 111�� 111�10 1�1111111 I W ��/�®�� 111111� 1�0111111�"lli�l A'a a awa_ _ g T � �g�a�glra� _ pp 1 Q N uj N i N i 0 N O 00 a a o< EL y ,- N 1. S W N m KH�M1 <��; wav0 - r :! � c CD w N c a ?r co i N € t CN J Ng�N O J w N W rc�jz WSoW a a. W uxww O CN G Q J �.9t I T46S I T47S T48S I T49S I T50S I T51S I T52S Packet Pg. 311 9.C.3 Cofer County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 Pre -Application Meeting Notes Petition Types: GMPA & PUDA Date and Times: January 30, 2020 1:30 & 2:30 PM Assigned Planners: Corby Schmidt (GMPA) & Nancy Gundlach (PUDA) Engineering Manager (for PPL's and FP's): n a Project Information Project Name: Collier Blvd Community Facility Subdistrict PL #s: PL20200000114 & 115 Property ID #s: 00416560008 & 00418400700 Current Zoning: First Assembly Ministries PUD Project Address NE corner of Collier Blvd. (CR951) and The Lord's Way, in 14-50-26, Naples Applicant: David Torres, et.al. Agent Name: Hole Montes, Inc., Address:950 Encore Way Phone: 239-254-2018; email: stephaniekarol@hmeng.com Property Owner: BLC Naples, LLC Please provide the following, if applicable: i. Total Acreage: ±68.78 ii. Proposed # of Residential Units: provided as density, as up to 8.5 DU/A (±584 DUs) on non-residential portion of aroaerty This is a large scale GMPA to amend the Collier Blvd Community Facility Subdistrict to allow additional multi -family residential development at a density not to exceed 9.7 units per acre. The Subdistrict is 68.78f acres in size and located in Section 14, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. The property is located at the northwestern corner of the intersection of Collier Blvd. and The Lords Way. iii. Proposed Commercial Square Footage: n a iv. For Amendments, indicate the original petition number: FLUM designation of Collier Blvd. Community Facility Subdistrict; from CP-2005-13: originally adopted Dec 4 2007 by Ord. 07-79; renumbered only Sep 13 2011 by Ord. 2011-27• amendments adopted Dec 11, 2018 by Ord. 2018-59 Updated 7/24/2018 Page I 1 of 6 Packet Pg. 312 9.C.3 Co*er County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 V. If there is an Ordinance or Resolution associated with this project, please indicate the type and number: see answer above vi. If the project is within a Plat, provide the name and AR#/PL#: Meeting Notes As of 10/16/2017 all Zoning applications have revised applications, and your associated application is included in your notes; additionally a *new Property Ownership Disclosure Form is required for all applications. A copy of this new form is included in your pre -alp notes — link is https://www.colliergov.net/Home/ShowDocument?id=75093. These notes are being provided supplemental to the (zoning notes) already provided. These notes are also uploaded into CityView and made visible in the Documents and Images section there. POST PRE-APP COMMENTS: FLUM designation is Urban Mixed Use District, Collier Blvd Community Facility Subdistrict. Current residential density is 4.28 DU/A (on easterly ±28-acre portion). Project would allow redevelopment of PUD, with up to ±584 additional market rate and affordable MFDUs. Desired residential density of 8.5 DU/A (on westerly portion) will be derived from new Subdistrict provisions, with affordable units yet to be agreed upon (but likely akin to provisions in current agreement for existing units on westerly portion of site). C Giblin to work with this applicant directly. All community facility -related uses have been or will be removed from the site, while the church structure may remain and adaptively re -used (as clubhouse or another residential amenity). No apparent Comprehensive Planning issues; Agent notified of the need to address, as applicable: Compliance with the FLUE/FLUM (Urban Mixed Use District) [GMPA] and with Collier Blvd Community Facility Subdistrict; [PUDA] Compliance with FLUE Objective 5 and its applicable policies, esp. s/s 5.3, 5.6 (GMP consistency clause; LDC compatibility & complementary clause); [PUDA] Compliance with FLUE Objective 7 and its applicable policies 7.1 through 7.4 (Toward Better Places — Community Character Plan); [PUDA] Updated 7/24/2018 Page 1 2 of 6 c a� c a� E Q 2 0 Packet Pg. 313 9.C.3 __ Co Mer County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 • Locate key text provisions in the Community Facility Subdistrict language, with any/all other district, subdistrict, overlay, et.al. text provisions appropriately referencing readers to them. • Identify the source or sources from which other dwelling units/density are derived. If either of these are solely from the amendment providing for new density, explain justification and rationale for so, and how this meets the purposes and intents of the Mixed Use District. • Provide proper data & analysis for the introduction and amount of residential density; If project is proposed solely for market rate rental apartments, make sure data & analysis supports this; or if proposed for market rate and/or affordable rental apartments, and/or market rate and/or affordable for -sale residential units, make sure data & analysis supports these. • Prepare separate narratives to address all impacts to the surrounding area [to accompany both GMPA & PUDA application materials]. Clearly explain in both narratives which properties [including outparcels] are involved in this project; which properties [including outparcels] are contributing to residential density calculations; how properties [including outparcels] presently contribute to traffic calculations and trip counts and, how these properties will be contributing to traffic calculations and trip counts in the context of the present proposal. • Revise Conceptual Master Plan, (and elsewhere land uses, acreage figures, etc. need to be revised) in the PUD Document to bring current. [PUDA] • Address sections 163.3167(9), 163.3177(1) and (6), and 163.3184, Florida Statutes. Note particularly the requirement to provide supporting data and analyses the local governing body [County] deems appropriate, to demonstrate the amendment is needed. [GMPA] • Follow the established format of the FLUE for text amendments "to preserve the internal consistency" of the GMP and prepare and include: [GMPA] ❖ Proposed, new or revised subdistrict text provisions, including: the maximum number of dwelling units; the residential density; description of and reference to residential area (to be) appearing on the accompanying inset map. • Follow the established format of the FLUE for the map exhibits "to preserve the internal consistency" of the GMP and prepare and include: [GMPA] Proposed / revised Countywide FLUM, new subdistrict inset map, or other map, as applicable. This includes entries where district and subdistrict maps are listed. Updated 7/24/2018 Page 1 3 of 6 c a� c as E Q a U LO 0 co 0 F4 Packet Pg. 314 9.C.3 Czar County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 Staff notes: For a submitted petition, after the sufficiency review process is complete [outside CityView] and the petition package is deemed sufficient, an electronic version of the entire submittal is needed, preferably in PDF format, preferably on a CD; The County has instituted an electronic (paperless) agenda process for the Board of County Commissioners' hearings. All Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM) activities and reviews are arranged directly with the Comprehensive Planning staff/the assigned Project Coordinator; these activities include: reviewing/approving the draft notification to surrounding property owners; reviewing/approving the draft newspaper advertisement; reviewing/approving/ coordinating proposed NIM meeting dates, times and locations; the draft NIM notification to surrounding property owners; accepting/filing applicant -prepared Affidavit of Notification (from NDN), posted Public Hearing sign photograph, and, NIM transcript/minutes/notes and clearly audible in its entirety, an audio/video recording, plus, 3 flash drives containing the full, clear NIM audio recording.** This will be a large scale GMPA as provided in Ch. 163.3184, F.S. Collier County allows large scale GMPA to be submitted and processed concurrent with companion PUDZ; the NIM for both petitions, and public notices for it, may be done jointly; and public hearings for both petitions, and public notices for them, may be done jointly — at Adoption stage of GMPA. If the petitions run concurrently, then the effective date of the PUDA petition would be linked to the effective date of the GMPA petition. Large scale GMPA are no longer subject to 3 amendment cycles per Collier County Resolution 12- 234. Data and analysis (D&A) needed to support the amendment. Typically, this includes a needs analysis/market study demonstrating the proposed amendment (uses, densities, intensities) is needed; and, demonstration that the subject site is the appropriate location to fulfill that need (site is within the identified market area, proposed uses are generally compatible with surrounding lands, infrastructure impacts are acceptable or mitigation provided, environmental and cultural impacts are acceptable, the amendment furthers and is not contrary to the goals, purposes and vision of the GMP, etc.). [Staff is available to meet separately to discuss needs analysis at no charge.] The D&A should also demonstrate how the GMPA will further — and not undermine — the purpose, intent, goals and provisions of the FLUE. The estimated legal advertising costs will be provided to each applicant and payment will be required prior to advertising for any hearings. Include the raw data with all studies and analyses used to support their conclusions, as copies from source documents, attachments or appendices thereto, to facilitate a thorough substantive review. Be sure of consistency/conformity/harmony with other Goals, Objectives, Policies (GOPs) and provisions in the Element being amended and any other Element of the GMP relevant to the Updated 7/24/2018 Page 1 4 of 6 c a� c a� E Q a U LO 0 co 0 F4 Packet Pg. 315 9.C.3 Czer County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 petition, as well as any other applicable regulations (e.g. Coastal High Hazard Area (CH HA), specific LDC provisions); fully explain furtherance of existing GOPs relevant to the petition, and of any other plans or designations which are applicable or relevant to the petition (e.g. a redevelopment plan, corridor management plan, etc.)** It is important to carefully organize the amendment package; be sure all exhibits are consistently labeled, are in the proper order, and are correctly referenced on the pages of the application; For site -specific amendments, be sure all mapping clearly identifies the subject site, includes North arrow and scale, and source; A petition narrative is often helpful; For corporate ownership, it is not acceptable to only list the corporation name; In some instances, property is owned by a corporation that in turn is comprised of other corporations; It is necessary to provide a list of individuals as officers or stockholders of the corporation(s) for purposes of full disclosure; The objective of disclosure is to reveal the individuals with an interest in the property (including seeing if any staff or public officials .are included).** For a submitted petition, after the sufficiency review process is complete [outside CityView] and the petition package is deemed sufficient, an electronic version of the entire submittal is needed, preferably in PDF format, preferably on a CD. The County has instituted an electronic (paperless) agenda process for the Board of County Commissioners' hearings. Be reminded that your primary contacts for questions or concerns is/are the Planner(s) assigned to manage these petitions, Corby Schmidt, AICP (GMPA) and Nancy Gundlach, AICP (PUDA). Please copy project manager(s) on meeting invitations and meetings arranged with other review agencies, and other correspondence. Note: ** denotes staff information/clarification provided post -pre -application conference. The expectation of staff support for these applications or recommendations for approval are not implied or expressed by comments made during this conference. Disclaimer: Information provided by staff to applicant during the Pre -Application Meeting is based on the best available data at the time of the meeting and may not fully inform the applicant of issues that could arise during the process. The Administrative Code and LDC dictates the regulations which all applications must satisfy. Any checklists provided of required data for an application may not fully outline what is needed. It is the applicant's responsibility to provide all required data. Notes from this mtg. have been prepared & are foldered in: G:\CDES Planning Services\Comprehensive\COMP PLANNING GMP DATA\Comp Plan Amendments\2020 Cycles & Small Scale Petitions\pre-app meetings in 2020\1-30-2020 Collier Blvd CF Sbdstrct GMPA-PUDZ duo. These notes will also be/have also been uploaded into CityView and will be/are visible there. Updated 7/24/2018 Page 1 5 of 6 Packet Pg. 316 9.C.3 >. cover County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 Pre-Application Meeting Sign -In Sheet PL #S PL20200000114 & 115 Collier County Contact Information: REFER TO ZONING SECTION SIGN -IN SHEETS. GACDES Planning Services\Comprehensive\Comp Planning GMP DATA\Comp Plan Amendments\2020 Cycles & Smalls\pre-app meetings in 2020\1-30-20 Collier Blvd CF Subdistrict\1-30-2020 Collier Blvd CF Sbdstrct GMPA-PUDZ duo.docx Updated 7/24/2018 Page 1 6 of 6 c a� E c a� E Q a LO 0 co 0 F4 Packet Pg. 317 9.C.3 AFFIDAVIT OF AUTHORIZATION FOR PETITION NUMBERS(S) GMPA-PL-20200000115 1, DAVIDE.TORRES (print name), as MGR (title, if applicable) of PAL LAND, LLC (company, If applicable), swear or affirm under oath, that I am the (choose one) owner applicant contract purchaser and that: 1. I have full authority to secure the approval(s) requested and to impose covenants and restrictions on the referenced property as a result of any action approved by the County in accordance with this application and the Land Development Code; 2. All answers to the questions in this application and any sketches, data or other supplementary matter attached hereto and made a part of this application are honest and true; 3, 1 have authorized the staff of Collier County to enter upon the property during normal working hours for the purpose of investigating and evaluating the request made through this application; and that 4. The property will be transferred, conveyed, sold or subdivided subject to the conditions and restrictions imposed by the approved action. 5. Weil authorize Peel McMichael, Robert Whom& Richard Yovanovich to act as our/my representative in any matters regarding this petition Including 1 through 2 above. *Notes: e If the applicant is a corporation, then it is usually executed by the corp. pres. or v, pres. a /f the applicant is a Limited Liability Company (L.L.C.) or Limited Company (L.C.), then the documents should typically be signed by the Company's "Managing Member." e If the applicant is a partnership, then typically a partner can sign on behalf of the partnership. e If the applicant is a limited partnership, then the general partner must sign and be identified as the `general partner" of the named partnership. a If the applicant is a trust, then they must include the trustee's name and the words "as trustee': o In each instance, first determine the applicant's status, e.g., individual, corporate, trust, partnership, and then use the appropriate format for that ownership. Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I have read the foregoing Affidavit of Authorization and that the facts stated in It are t u i!-Z0 . Si ature Date DAVID E . TORRES , MGR, MB-tTM-D —, -$L-L tot t(K-,; (10aLl STATE OF FLORIDA 0-C, �v-e:,f ;}o iN; L- L COUNTY OF COLLIER �L v I,-LL The foregoing Instrument �was acknowleged before me by means of physical presence or El online notarization this Z day of IV ,7 1CX4- , 20 � , by (printed name of owner or qualifier) Such person(s) Notary Public must check applicable box: Are personally known to me 0 Has produced a urrent drivers license in Has produce as Identification. Notary Signature: CP\08-COA-00115u55 REV 3/4/2020 �r4✓✓1i11 �. n.��,re/'� Fwo,� rLExpiies ublic Stuto of Florida AgLiiar y,' GG 1458501210912021 f4!°Y/Ld�'u�.��" Oti Packet Pg. 318 9.C.3 AFFIDAVIT OF AUTHORIZATION FOR PETITION NUMBERS(S) GMPA-PL-20200000115 1 DAVID E. TORRES (print name), as MGR (title, If applicable) of 3805TLW, LLC (company, If applicable), swear or affirm under oath, that I am the (choose one) owner❑ applicant❑contract purchaser❑and that: 1. 1 have full authority to secure the approval(s) requested and to impose covenants and restrictions on the referenced property as a result of any action approved by the County in accordance with this application and the Land Development Code; 2. All answers to the questions in this application and any sketches, data or other supplementary matter attached hereto and made a part of this application are honest and true; 3. 1 have authorized the staff of Collier County to enter upon the property during normal working hours for the purpose of investigating and evaluating the request made through this application; and that 4. The property will be transferred, conveyed, sold or subdivided subject to the conditions and restrictions imposed by the approved action. J. Well authorize Paul McMichael, Robert Where & Richard Yovanovich to act as our/my representative in any matters regarding this petition including 1 through 2 above. "Notes: o If the applicant is a corporation, then it is usually executed by the corp. pres. or v. pres. o If the applicant is a Limited Liability Company (L.L.C.) or Limited Company (L.C.), then the documents should typically be signed by the Company's "Managing Member." o If the applicant is a partnership, then typically a partner can sign on behalf of the partnership. o If the applicant is a limited partnership, then the general partner must sign and be identified as the "general partner" of the named partnership. o If the applicant is a trust, then they must include the trustee's name and the words "as trustee". • In each instance, first determine the applicant's status, e.g., individual, corporate, trust, partnership, and then use the appropriate format for that ownership. Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I�h `" read the foregoing Affidavit of Authorization and that the facts stated in it reef tru- /1 �. - / azure DAVID E. TORRES MGR, 38 W, LLC STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLI 1�-9-Zo Date Tlinstrument was acknowleged before me by means of physical presence or ❑ online notarization this Q�day of fl&Vi YY—f' , 207-0. by (printed name of owner or qualifier) ��t1yt0 E • �F�f S 7Ar person(s) Notary Public must check applicable box: e personally (mown to me ❑ Has produced a current drivers license OYPW Notary Public State of Florida ❑ Has produc �— as identification. `r Maritza Aguiar o My Commission GG 145059 Notary Signatur Fornft Expires 12,10812021 �— CP\08-con-00115\155 REV 3/4/2020 c a� E c a� E Q 0 Packet Pg. 319 9.C.3 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net Cor County 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239)252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 PROPERTY. OWNERSHIP DISCLOSURE FORM This is a required form with all land use petitions, except for Appeals and Zoning Verification Letters. Should any changes of ownership or changes in contracts for purchase occur subsequent to the date of application, but prior to the date of the final public hearing, it is the responsibility of the applicant, or agent on his behalf, to submit a supplemental disclosure of interest form. Please complete the following, use additional sheets if necessary. a. If the property is owned fee simple by an INDIVIDUAL, tenancy by the entirety, tenancy in common, or joint tenancy, list all parties with an ownership interest as well as the 16 C. ICI l.ellldr,e UI sucn Irllere!)L; Name and Address % of Ownershia If the property is owned by a CORPORATION, list the officers and stockholders and the ,ercentage of stocK owned by each: Name and Address % of Ownershia If the property is in the name of a TRUSTEE, list the beneficiaries of the trust with the t l[Lu lldge VI I11le1e5l: Created 9/28/2017 Name and Address I % of Ownership Page 1 of 3 Packet Pg. 320 9.C.3 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.coiliersov.net 0 e. f Co y CDunty 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 If the property is in the name of a GENERAL or LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, list the name of the general and/or limited partners: Name and Address % of Ownership Lord's Way Apartments, LLC as successor via merger to ML Land, LLC 7742 Alico Road, Fort Myers, FL 33912 George P. Bauer Revocable Trust 80% Gary Hains, P.A (10%) and David E. Torres Revocable Trust (10%) 20% If there is a CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE, with an individual or individuals, a Corporation, Trustee, or a Partnership, list the names of the contract purchasers below, including the We racers, stocimoiaers, beneticiaries, or partners: Name and Address % of Ownership Date of Contract: If any contingency clause or contract terms involve additional parties, list all individuals or V , or trust: Name and Address g. Date subject property acquired _ Properties acquired: 3805 TLW, LLC: 10-29-2020 & ❑ Leased: Term of lease years /months Lord's Way Apartments, LLC: 10-15-2015 (Merger: 6-2016) If, Petitioner has option to buy, indicate the following: Created 9/28/2017 Page 2 of 3 c d c am E Q a. 2 0 Ln 0 to 0 N c a� E U 0 c a R Y U M m U a. U U 0 0 0 o' 0 N O N J d U �L rt+ N �a L O J 'a R 7 0 m `m 6 c a� E U to Q Packet Pg. 321 9.C.3 Co .'U County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 E www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 y E Date of option: Q Date option terminates: , or t9 Anticipated closing date: c AFFIRiFli'PROPERTY OWNERSHIP.INFB]RMATION Any petition required to have Property Ownership Disclosure, will not be accepted without this form. Requirements for petition types are located on the associated application form. Any change in ownership whether individually or with a Trustee, Company or other interest -holding party, must be disclosed to Collier County immediately if such change occurs prior to the petition's final public hearing. As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is included in this submittal package. I understand that failure to include all necessary submittal information may result in the delay of processing this petition. The completed application, all required submittal materials, and fees shall be submitted to: Growth Management Department ATTN: Business Center 28.00 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Agent/Owner Signature Date Robert J. Where, FAICP, President Agent/Owner Name (please print) Created 9/28/2017 Page 3 of 3 Packet Pg. 322 9.C.3 L /�Oco/63s�q a• (Requestors Name) (Address) (Address) (City/State/Zip]Phone 4) PICK-UP WAIT M MAIL (Business Entity Name) Certified Copies _V Certificates of Status fSpecial Instructions to Filing Officer: Office Use Only ��I�IR�nIINhInI�GIVII�!@Il��lr� 300284871523 04?128/16---01015--015 *.4,80.0o '" • 0 N PLC •JUN 16 2016 p CONWJ - ki c as E c as E Q LO 0 w 0 N Packet Pg. 323 9.C.3 �b �yE S I FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF STATE Division of Corporations May 11, 2016 DAVID E. TORRES LORD'S WAY APARTMENTS, LLC 7742 ALICO ROAD FT. MYERS, FL 33912 SUBJECT: LORD'S WAY APARTMENTS, LLC Ref. Number: L14000163849 We have received your document and check(s) totaling $80.00. However, the enclosed document has not been filed and is being returned to you for the following reason(s): As a condition of a merger, pursuant to s.605.0212(8), Florida Statutes, each party to the merger must be active and current in filing its annual reports with the Department of State through December 31 of the calendar year in which the articles of merger are submitted for filing. Please return your document, along with a copy of this letter, within 60 days or your filing will be considered abandoned. If you have any questions concerning the filing of your document, please call (850) 245-6050. Darlene Connell Regulatory Specialist III Letter Number: 116A00009864 www.sunbiz.org Packet Pg. 324 9.C.3 I June 3, 2016 Florida Department of State Division of Corporations To Whom It May Concern: Please accept the attached resubmittal of the Articles of Merger for Lord's Way Apartments, LLC and ML Land, LLC which the former remaining as post the merger. Check was sent with prior request. Original submittal was returned due to the fact that one of the entities had not filed an annual report. It has now been filed. Please process the attached merger. Sincer , David E. Lord's ay Apartments, LLC Manager 7742 Alico Rd Ft. Myers, FL 33912 239-208-4079 N `n Y co 1 v� Packet Pg. 325 9.C.3 TO: Amendment Section Division of Corporat'llons SUBJECT: �0 ra `s COVER LETTER 4parfirAe.,' S Name of Surviving Party The enclosed Certificate of Merger and fee(s) are submitted for filing. Please return all correspondence concerning this matter to: 1)av`CX� 1Dt C�—S Contact Person FirnV/ ompany Address City, State and Zip Code c�av ; cQ 6 A GA A3�seJ08 cpM E-mail address: (to be used for future annual report notification) For further information concerning this matter, please call: 1,,LC-- - 1 o CYe S at ( 3 a a o g 9 Name of Contact Person Area Code Daytime Telephone Number Certified copy (optional) $30.00 STREET ADDRESS: Amendment Section Division of Corporations Clifton Building 2661 Executive Center Circle Tallahassee, FL 32301 CR2E080 (2/14) MAILING ADDRESS: Amendment Section Division of Corporations P. 0. Box 6327 Tallahassee, FL 32314 Packet Pg. 326 9.C.3 Articles of ]Merger For Florida Limited Liability Company The following Articles of Merger is submitted to merge the following Florida Limited Liability Company(ies) in accordance with s. 605,1025, Florida Statutes. FIRST: The exact name, form/entity type, and jurisdiction for each me. relnQ party are as follows: Name Jurisdiction Form/Entity Type -o Is. XL- t o. , l_LG 'F to r, C� g j-L- C. SECOND: The exact name, form/entity type, and jurisdiction of the surviving party are as follows: Name Jurisdiction Form/Entity Type nn THIRD: The merger was approved by each domestic merging entity that is a limited liability company in accordance with ss.605.1021-605.1026; by each other merging entity in accordance with the laws of its jurisdiction; and by each member of such limited liability company who as a result of the merger will have interest holder liability under s.605.1023(1)(b). 1 of 3 rn 1 CO r *rr. N Packet Pg. 327 9.C.3 FOURTH: Please check one of the boxes that apply to surviving entity: (if applicable) This entity exists before the merger and is a domestic filing entity, the amendment, if any to its public organic record E are attached. -0 c ar O This entity is created by the merger and is a domestic filing entity, the public organic record is attached. E Q a O This entity is created by the merger and is a domestic limited liability limited partnership or a domestic limited 2 liability partnership, its statement of qualification is attached. .. LO 0 O This entity is a foreign entity that does not have a certificate of authority to transact business in this state. The c mailing address to which the department may send any process served pursuant to s. 605.0117 and Chapter 48, Florida Statutes is: c ar E U 0 0 a FIFTH: This entity agrees to pay any members with appraisal rights the amount, to which members are entitled under ss.605.1006 and 605,1061-605,1072, F.S. SIXTH: If other than the date of filing, the delayed effective date of the merger, which cannot be prior to nor more than 90 days after the date this document is filed by the Florida Department of State: Note: If the date inserted in this block does not meet the applicable statutory filing requirements, this date will not be listed as the document's effective date on the Department of State's records. SEVE N'I H: Signature(s) for Each Party: Typed or Printed Name of Entity/Organization:, Signatur (� Narne of Individual: l-o ra is Corporations: Chairman, Vice Chairman, President or Officer (Irno directors selected, signature of incorporator.) General partnerships: Signature of a general partner or authorized person Florida Limited Partnerships: Signatures of all general partners Non -Florida Limited Partnerships: Signature of a general partner Limited Liability Companies: Signature of an authorized person Fees: For each Limited Liability Company: $25.00 For each Corporation: $35.00 For each Limited Partnership: $52.50 For each General Partnership: $25.00 For each Other Business Entity: $25.00 Certified Cony (optional): $30.00 Packet Pg. 328 9.C.3 APPLICATION FOR A REQUEST TO AMEND THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN APPLICATION NUMBER DATE RECEIVED PRE -APPLICATION CONFERENCE DATE DATE SUFFICIENT This application, with all required supplemental data and information, must be completed and accompanied by the appropriate fee, and returned to the Growth Management Department, Zoning Division, Comprehensive Planning Section, 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida 34104. 239-252- 2400. The application must be reviewed by staff for sufficiency within 30 calendar days following the filing deadline before it will be processed and advertised for public hearing. The applicant will be notified in writing, of the sufficiency determination. If insufficient, the applicant will have 30 days to remedy the deficiencies. For additional information on the processing of the application, see Resolution 97-431 as amended by Resolution 98-18 (both attached). If you have any questions, please contact the Comprehensive Planning Section at 239-252-2400. SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS I. GENERAL INFOMRATION A. Name of Applicant David E. Torres, MGR Company 3805 TLW, LLC & Lord's Way Apartments, LLC Address 7742 Alico Road City Naples State Florida Zip Code 33912 Phone Number 239-208-4079 Fax Number N/A B. Name of Agent Robert J. Mulhere, FAICP, President/CEO • THIS WILL BE THE PERSON CONTACTED FOR ALL BUSINESS RELATED TO THE PETITION. Company Hole Mantes, Inc. Address 950 Encore Way City Naples State Florida Zip Code 34110 Phone Number 239-254-2000 Fax Number 239-254-2099 Name of Agent Paula N. C. McMichael, AICP, Director of Planning_ Company Hole Montes, Inc. Address 950 Encore Way City Naples State Florida Zip Code 34110 Phone Number 239-254-2000 Fax Number 239-254-2099 Name of Agent Richard Yovanovich, Esquire Company Coleman Yovanovich & Koester. P.A. Address 4001 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 300 City Naples State Florida Zip Code 34103 Phone Number 239-435-3535 Fax Number 239-435-1218 C. Name of Owner (s) of Record See Exhibit "I.C" Warranty Deeds D. Name, Address and Qualifications of additional planners, architects, engineers, environmental consultants and other professionals providing information contained in this application. 1 H:\2019\2019076\WP\GMPA\Resubmittal\GMPA Application (rev 2-12-2021) .doc c a� E c a� E Q 2 O LO 0 W 0 F4 Packet Pg. 329 9.C.3 Norman J. Trebilcock, AICP, P.E., President Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, P.A. 1205 Piper Blvd., Suite 202, Naples, FL 34110 Telephone: 239-566-9551 Email: ntrebilcock@trebilcock.biz Russ Weyer, President Real Estate Econometrics, Inc. 707 Orchid Drive, Naples, FL 34102 Telephone: 239-269-1341 Email: Rweyer@ree-i.com See attached Resumes Disclosure of Interest Information: See attached Disclosure of Interest Form A. If the property is owned fee simple by an INDIVIDUAL, Tenancy by the entirety, tenancy in common, or joint tenancy, list all parties with an ownership interest as well as the percentage of such interest. (Use additional sheets if necessary). Name and Address Percentage of Ownership B. If the property is owned by a CORPORATION, list the officers and stockholders and the percentage of stock owned by each. Name and Address Percentage of Stock C. If the property is in the name of a TRUSTEE, list the beneficiaries of the trust with the percentage of interest. Name and Address Percentage of Interest D. If the property is in the name of a GENERAL or LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, list the name of the general and/or limited partners. Name and Address Percentage of Ownership E. If there is a CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE, with an individual or individuals, a Corporation, Trustee, or a Partnership, list the names of the contract purchasers below, including the officers, stockholders, beneficiaries, or partners. Name and Address Date of Contract: Percentage of Ownership F. If any contingency clause or contract terms involve additional parties, list all individuals or officers, if a corporation, partnership, or trust. G. Dates subject properties acquired: 3805 TLW, LLC: 10-29-2020 & Lord's Way Apartments LLC: 10-15-2015 (Merger: 6-2016) 2 H:\2019\2019076\WP\GMPA\Resubmittal\GMPA Application (rev 2-12-2021) .doc c a� E c a� E Q 2 O Packet Pg. 330 9.C.3 If, Petitioner has option to buy, indicate date of option: and date option terminates: , or anticipated closing: H. Should any changes of ownership or changes in contracts for purchase occur subsequent to the date of application, but prior to the date of the final public hearing, it is the responsibility of the applicant, or agent on his behalf, to submit a supplemental disclosure of interest form. c a� III. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY: Q A. LEGAL DESCRIPTION See Exhibit "I.C" Warranty Deeds U B. GENERAL LOCATION NE corner of the intersection of Collier Blvd. and The Lords Way LO 0 W 0 N C. PLANNING COMMUNITY Royal Fakapalm D. TAZ 359 N E. SIZE IN ACRES 68.78 F. ZONING MPUD d E G. SURROUNDING LAND USE PATTERN See Exhibit "V.B.I" Future Land Use Map ' U 0 H. FUTURE LAND USE MAP DESIGNATION(S) Urban, Urban Mixed Use District, Collier Blvd a Community Facility Subdistrict IV. TYPE OF REQUEST: A. GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN ELEMENT (S) TO BE AMENDED: Housing Element Traffic Circulation Sub -Element Aviation Sub -Element Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element Solid Waste Sub -Element Capital Improvement Element X Future Land Use Element Immokalee Master Plan Recreation/Open Space Mass Transit Sub -Element Potable Water Sub -Element NGWAR Sub -Element Drainage Sub -Element CCME Element Golden Gate Master Plan B. AMEND PAGE(S)44-46 OF THE FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT AS FOLLOWS: (Use Strike thre gh to identify language to be deleted; Use Underline to identify language to be added). Attach additional pages if necessary: See Exhibit "IV.B.I" C. AMEND FUTURE LAND USE MAP(S) DESIGNATION FROM Collier Blvd Commercial Facility Subdistrict TO Collier Blvd Lord's Way Mixed Use Subdistrict D. AMEND OTHER MAP(S) AND EXHIBITS AS FOLLOWS: (Name & Page #) See Exhibit "IV.D.I" Collier Blvd. Lord's Way Subdistrict Map E. DESCRIBE ADDITIONAL CHANGES REQUESTED: N/A 3 H:\2019\2019076\WP\GMPA\Resubmittal\GMPA Application (rev 2-12-2021) .doe Packet Pg. 331 9.C.3 V. REQUIRED INFORMATION: NOTE: ALL AERIALS MUST BE AT A SCALE OF NO SMALLER THAN I"=400'. At least one copy reduced to 8-1/2 x 1 I shall be provided of all aerials and/or maps. A. LAND USE Exh. V.A.1 Provide general location map showing surrounding developments (PUD, DRI's, existing zoning) with subject property outlined. Exh. V.A.2 Provide most recent aerial of site showing subject boundaries, source, and date. Exh. V.A.3 Provide a map and summary table of existing land use and zoning within a radius of 300 feet from boundaries of subject property. B. FUTURE LAND USE AND DESIGNATION Exh. V.B.I Provide map of existing Future Land Use Designation(s) of subject property and adjacent lands, with acreage totals for each land use designation on the subject property. C. ENVIRONMENTAL Exh. V.C.I Provide most recent aerial and summary table of acreage of native habitats and soils occurring on site. HABITAT IDENTIFICATION MUST BE CONSISTENT WITH THE FDOT-FLORIDA LAND USE, COVER AND FORMS CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM (FLUCCS CODE). NOTE: THIS MAY BE INDICATED ON SAME AERIAL AS THE LAND USE AERIAL IN "A" ABOVE. N/A Provide a summary table of Federal (US Fish & Wildlife Service) and State (Florida Game & Freshwater Fish Commission) listed plant and animal species known to occur on the site and/or known to inhabit biological communities similar to the site (e.g. panther or black bear range, avian rookery, bird migratory route, etc.). Identify historic and/or archaeological sites on the subject property. D. GROWTH MANAGEMENT Reference 9J-11.006, F.A.C. and Collier County's Capital Improvements Element Policy 1.1.2 (Copies attached). l . INSERT "Y" FOR YES OR "N" FOR NO IN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING: N Is the proposed amendment located in an Area of Critical State Concern? (Reference 9J-1 1.006(1) (a) (5), F.A.C.). IF so, identify area located in ACSC. N Is the proposed amendment directly related to a proposed Development of Regional Impact pursuant to Chapter 380 F.S. ? (Reference 9J-1 1.006(l) (a)7.a, F.A.C.) N Is the proposed amendment directly related to a proposed Small Scale Development Activity pursuant to Subsection 163.3187 (1) (c), F.S. ? (Reference 9J-11.006(1)(a)7.b, F.A.C.) N Does the proposed amendment create a significant impact in population which is defined as a potential increase in County -wide population by more than 5% of population projections? (Reference Capital Improvement Element Policy 1.1.2). If yes, indicate mitigation measures being proposed in conjunction with the proposed amendment. Y-Exh. V.D. Does the proposed land use cause an increase in density and/or intensity to the uses permitted in a specific land use designation and district identified (commercial, industrial, etc.) or is the proposed land use a new land use designation or district? (Reference Rule 9J-5.006(5) F.A.C.). If so, provide data and analysis to support the suitability of land for the proposed use, and of environmentally sensitive land, ground water and natural resources. (Reference Rule 9J-1 1.007, F.A.C.) 4 H:\2019\2019076\WP\GMPA\Resubmittal\GMPA Application (rev 2-12-2021) .doe c a� c a� Q 2 O LO 0 W 0 Packet Pg. 332 9.C.3 E. PUBLIC FACILITIES 1. Exh. V.E.1 Provide the existing Level of Service Standard (LOS) and document the impact the proposed change will have on the following public facilities: Exh. V.E.1 Potable Water Exh. V.E.1 Sanitary Sewer E Exh. V.E.3 Arterial & Collector Roads; Name specific road and LOS See TIS a� E Exh. V.E.1 Drainage Q Exh. V.E.I Solid Waste a Exh. V.E.1 Parks: Community and Regional If the proposed amendment involves an increase in residential density, or an LO o increase in intensity for commercial and/or industrial development that would N cause the LOS for public facilities to fall below the adopted LOS, indicate mitigation measures being proposed in conjunction with the proposed amendment. c (Reference Capital Improvement Element Objective 1 and Policies) E 2. Exh. V.E.2 Provide a map showing the location of existing services and public facilities that will serve the subject property (i.e. water, sewer, fire protection, police protection, schools and emergency medical services. 3. Exh. V.E.I Document proposed services and public facilities, identify provider, and describe the effect the proposed change will have on schools, fire protection and emergency medical services. F. OTHER Identify the following areas relating to the subject property: Exh. V.F.1 Flood zone based on Flood Insurance Rate Map data (FIRM). N Location of wellfields and cones of influence, if applicable. (Identified on Collier County Zoning Maps) Y Traffic Congestion Boundary, if applicable N Coastal Management Boundary, if applicable N High Noise Contours (65 LDN or higher) surrounding the Naples Airport, if applicable (identified on Collier County Zoning Maps). G. SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION Y $16,700.00 non-refundable filing fee made payable to the Board of County Commissioners due at time of submittal. (Plus proportionate share of advertising costs) N $9,000.00 non-refundable filing fee for a Small Scale Amendment made payable to the Board of County Commissioners due at time of submittal. (Plus proportionate share of advertising costs) Y Proof of ownership (copy of deed) Y Notarized Letter of Authorization if Agent is not the Owner (See attached form) Y 1 Original and 5 complete, signed applications with all attachments including maps, at time of submittal. After sufficiency is completed, 25 copies of the complete application will be required. If you have held a pre -application meeting and paid the pre -application fee of $500.00 at the meeting, deduct that amount from the above application fee amount when submitting your application. All pre -application fees are included in the total application submittal fee. Otherwise the overage will be applied to future proportionate share advertising costs. * Maps shall include: North arrow, name and location of principal roadways and shall be at a scale of 1 " = 400' or at a scale as determined during the pre -application meeting. 5 H:\2019\2019076\WP\GMPA\Resubniittal\GMPA Application (rev 2-12-2021) .doc Packet Pg. 333 9.C.3 AFFIDAVIT OF AUTHORIZATION FOR PETITION NUMBERS(S) 2MPA•PL-20200000116 1, DAVIDE.TORRES (print name), as MOR (title, If applicable) of ML LAND, LLD (company, If applicable), swear or affirm under oath, that I am the (choose one) owner applicant contract purchaserand that: 1. I have full authority to secure the approval(s) requested and to impose covenants and restrictions on the referenced property as a result of any action approved by the County in accordance with this application and the Land Development Code; 2. All answers to the questions in this application and any sketches, data or other supplementary matter attached hereto and made a part of this application are honest and true; 3, 1 have authorized the staff of Collier County to enter upon the property during normal working hours for the purpose of Investigating and evaluating the request made through this application; and that 4. The property will be transferred, conveyed, sold or subdivided subject to the conditions and restrictions Imposed by the approved action. 5. Well authorize Paul McMichael, Robert Where 6 Richard Yovanovich to act as our/my representative In any matters regarding this petition Including 1 through 2 above. 'Notes; • If the applicant Is a corporation, then it is usually executed by the corp. pres. or v, pres. • If the applicant Is a Limited Liability Company (L.L.C.) or Limited Company (L.C,), then the documents should typically be signed by the Company's "Managing Member." • If the applicant Is a partnership, then typically a partner can sign on behalf of the partnership. • if the applicant is a limited partnership, then the general partner must sign and be identified as the 'general partner" of the named partnership. • if the applicant Is a trust; then they must Include the trustee's name and the words "as trustee". • In each Instance, first determine the applicant's status, e.g., individual, corporate, trust, partnership, and then use the appropriate format for that ownership. Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I have read the foregoing Affidavit of Authorization and that the facts stated In It are t u Si ature Date DAVID E. TORRES , MGR, Mir' ,d Lim tt rr(l�g C;,_5C.L pnor LLC ` �5,)eCe STATE OF FLORIDA V,GL oN-e r�c'' :b rry� L iy COUNTY OF COLLIER J " I-� - The foregoing Instrument was acknowleged before me by means of physical presence or 0 online notarization this day of r I-1C>, rt6X v , 20 I0, by (printed name of owner or qualifier) Such person(s) Notary Public must check applicable box: 1Ly.t Are personally known to me IIr j Has produced a urrent drivers license 0 Has produce�/—)as_ Identification. Notary Signature: CP108-COA-001151155 REV 3/4/2020 � �Exp�ires. tary Public Slpta of Florida 4 ritza Agular t\f?67 5lbn GG 145069 12l00/2021 c as E c as E Q 2 0 Packet Pg. 334 9.C.3 AFFIDAVIT OF AUTHORIZATION FOR PETITION NUMBERS(S) GMPA•PL-202000OD115 1, DAVIDE.TORRES (print name), as MGR (title, if applicable) of 3005TLw, LLO (company, If a licable), swear or affirm under oath, that I am the (choose one) owner applicant=contract purchaserand that: 1. 1 have full authority to secure the approval(s) requested and to impose covenants and restrictions on the referenced property as a result of any action approved by the County in accordance with this application and the Land Development Code; 2. All answers to the questions in this application and any sketches, data or other supplementary matter attached hereto and made a part of this application are honest and true; 3. 1 have authorized the staff of Collier County to enter upon the property during normal working hours for the purpose of investigating and evaluating the request made through this application; and that 4. The property will be transferred, conveyed, sold or subdivided subject to the conditions and restrictions imposed by the approved action. 5. Well authorize Paul McMichael, Robert Mulhare & Richard Yovanovlch to act as our/my representative in any matters regarding this petition including 1 through 2 above. *Notes: e If the applicant is a corporation, then it is usually executed by the corp. pres. or v. pres. a If the applicant is a Limited Liability Company (L.L.C.) or Limited Company (L.C.), then the documents should typically be signed by the Company's "Managing Member," o If the applicant is a partnership, then typically a partner can sign on behalf of the partnership. a If the applicant Is a limited partnership, then the general partner must sign and be identified as the "general partner" of the named partnership. o If the applicant is a trust, then they must include the trustee's name and the words "as trustee". e In each instance, first determine the applicant's status, e.g., individual, corporate, trust, partnership, and then use the appropriate format for that ownership. Under penalties of perjury, I declare that the facts stated in it re tr i1 /'i r s ature DAVID E. TORRES MGR, 3 STATE OF FLORIDA / COUNTY OF COLLI read the foregoing Affidavit of Authorization and that W, LLC If- Zz Date ITjD foregoing instrument was acknowleged before me by means of physical presence or © online notarization this < 1 day of OQkMV)e4' , 20LC. by (printed name of owner or qualifier) —X>0rd1C+ E- Z 0 Has produced a current drivers license NA^ f. Nolary Pubiic�$laleof Florida �j Has produc as identification, �7jpAyp Mariiza Aguiar E pMY 7e 12108/2 21 145659 Notary Signatur '��vvMr C148-con-00115\155 REV 3/4/2020 c as c a� E Q 2 0 Packet Pg. 335 INSTR 5183950 OR 5204 PG 3519 RECORDED 10/16/2015 9:01 AM PAGES 3 DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT, COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA DOC@.70 $19,985.00 REC $27.00 CONS $2,855,000.00 I This instrument prepared by: Jason W. Brant, Esq. Carlton Fields Jorden Burt, P.A. P.O. Box 3239 Tampa, Florida 33601-3239 and after recording return to: Harold J. Webre, Esq. Coleman Yovanovich & Koester, P.A. 4001 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 300 Naples, Florida 34103 Parcel No. 00418400700 COr� °ln1 r?n : 1.21'756" 000 THIS TRUSTEE'S D: TRAUDT, INDIVIDUALLY STEWARDSHIP TRUST U/ in its entirety by that cert ' f on September 17, 2014, wi a 34145, Grantor, to ML L of 7742 Alico Road, Fortyer EXHIBIT I.0 v,R. C ,y s of October, 2015, by MARY L. AS TRUSTEE - MARCO VISION AND SS 24, 2007, as sub ue tly amended, and as restated ntgof e o Vision d tewardship Trust executed a s 3 s C urt, Marco Island, Florida 1 ill y, with a mailing address i 3 9 2, tee. WI ri nE " 0 That the Grantor, puck `t the powers grant hat certain Trust Agreement dated August 24, 2007, as sub ueemended, ands'�stt d in its entirety by that certain Restatement of the Marco Vision a St ecuted on September 17, 2014 (the "Restated Trust Agreement'), and as sue � I red'�V. Mundie, Jr., who was replaced by Grantor on December 12, 2012, and which Grantor continues as trustee pursuant to the provisions of the Restated Trust Agreement, and in consideration of the sum of Ten Dollars ($10.00) and other good and valuable consideration in hand paid, has granted, bargained, aliened, remised, released, conveyed, and confirmed to the Grantee, and the Grantee's successors and assigns forever, all of the real property located in Collier County, Florida, more particularly described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made apart hereof by reference (the "PropertX"). TOGETHER WITH all and singular the tenements, hereditament, and appurtenances belonging or in any way appertaining to the Property. SUBJECT to easements, reservations, exceptions, encumbrances, restrictions of record and taxes for the year 2015 and subsequent years, but any reference in this Trustee's Deed to any easement, reservation, exception, encumbrance or restriction shall not serve to or be deemed to reimpose or reinstate any such easement, reservation, exception, encumbrance or restriction unless such reinstatement or reimposition is specifically set forth in this Trustee's Deed, 102426387.2 9.C.3 c as c as E Q 2 0 Packet Pg. 336 OR 5204 PG 3520 9.C.3 c d c a� E TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the same unto the Grantee and Grantee's successors and Q assigns, in fee simple forever. THE Grantor covenants to and with the Grantee and the Grantee's successors and tn assigns, that Mary L. Traudt serves as Trustee of the Marco Vision and Stewardship Trust u/a/d August 24, 2007, as subsequently amended, and as restated in its entirety by that certain N Restatement of the Marco Vision and Stewardship Trust executed on September 17, 2014, that said Trust is in full force and effect, that Mary L. Traudt as Trustee is empowered by said Trust c to enter into this Trustee's Deed, and that the Property is not the homestead property of Mary L. Traudt. THE Grantor further covenants with the Grantee that the Grantor has good right and lawful authority to convey the Property, and Grantor warrants the title to the Property for any acts of Grantor and will defend the title against all lawful claims of all persons claiming by, through or under the Grantor but none oth s— ---- �'R cpu IN WITNESS WHEREq�� ant horf `was e� l s Trustee's Deed on the day and year first above written. Signed, sealed and in the presence of: Priift name: n o4p n r, Y L. , Individually and as Trus of he Vision and Stewardship Trus 24, 2007, as subsequently Print name- amended d 4€ ated STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER The foregoing Trustee's Deed was acknowledged before me this I L) day of 2015, by Mary L. Traudt, Individually and as Trustee of the Marco Vision and Stewardship Trust u/a/d August 24, 2007, as subsequently amended and restated. She [ J is personally known to me or [✓f has produced as identification. f ```NNpnUlrlgrgrqrrr� � ' '7 G °•SPCA Gq9 ��•,,'�� S'gnat a of No Pu lc �`yJ �pTAq/, CCU'% USq 1 1 9 'r C / My Comm Expires = Name Printed N1ay 23, 2ots _ My Commission Expires: 5- 2 3 - J NO.EE201287 (Affix seal'% sp A118L�G pp�.�`� Commission No. Z f 2 �' % qNi t f OF FI�Q 2 102426387.2 Packet Pg. 337 *** OR 5204 PG 3521 *** 9.C.3 c d c at E Q EXHIBIT 'W' G9 LEGAL DESCRIPTTON U) 0 A parcel of land located in a portion of Section 14, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, o being more particularly described as follows: Commence at the Northwest comer of Section 14, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida; thence run S 00°49'12" W along the West line of the Northwest quarter of said Section 14, for a distance of 1,338.98 feet to a point on the North line of the South half of the Northwest quarter of said Section 14; thence run N 87028'39" E along the North line of the South half of the Northwest quarter of said Section 14, for a distance of 1,593.26 feet to the Point of Beginning of the Parcel of land herein described; thence continue N 87°28'39" E along the North line of the South half of the Northwest quarter of said Section 14, for a distance of 745.63 feet to a point on the East line of the West half of the East half of the Southeast quarter of the Northwest quarter of said Section 14; thence run S 00°48'18" W along the East line of the West half of the East half of the Southeast quarter of the Northwest quarter of said Section 14, for a distan f--1r341,3 feet to a point on the South line of the Northwest quarter of said Section 14; thence run S 87°3 ' e of the Northwest quarter of said Section 14, for a distance of 883.82 feet; thencel�W��3' E fort' f 213.59 feet; thence run N 22° 19'04" W for a distance of 94.95 feet; thence �g 9" E for a distan feet; thence run N 87°28'12" E for a distance of 172.03 feet; thence run 3f38" E for a distance of 1 .91 et; thence run N 00°3T14" E for a distance of 441.42 feet; thence S 8 2,812 f r a distana of 80. fee thence run N 0291'00" W for a distance of 335.86 feet to the Poi of ttnidb 102426387.2 Packet Pg. 338 INSTR 5949913 OR 5841 PG 824 RECORDED 11/5/2020 2:11 PM PAGES 3 CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT AND COMPTROLLER, COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA Doc@.70 $39,200.00 REC $27.00 CONS $5,600,000.00 c a� c a� E Q Prepared By: a. Christopher J. Thornton, Esq. 2 Thornton Law Firm 0 3080 Tamiami Trail E Un Naples, FL 34112 W File Number: 8005-002 c N Parcel Identification No. 00416560008 rn Consideration: $5,600,000.00 Doc Stamps: $39,200.00 Above This Line For Recording Data] Warranty Deed (STATUTORY FQW; S, TION 689.02, F.S.) THIS INDENTURE made th'•,rse ' day of 6 °� Nb between BLC Naples LLC, a Florida limited liability company, ost office addres 8 Tarflower Way, Naples, FL 34105, Grantor*, and 3805 TL L a rid a ]tn ted licompany, whose post office address is 7742 Alico Road, Fort ye s, FL 33'sn,_Qrantee�', WITNESSETH, that sai DOLLARS ($10.00) and other Grantee, the receipt whereof is Grantee, and Grantee's heirs and in Collier County, Florida, to -wit: See attached Exhibit A forever, the sum of TEN AND N0/100 grantor in hand paid by said gained, and sold to the said land, situate, lying and being Subject to the following: (a) ad valorem and non ad valorem real property taxes for the year 2020 and subsequent years; (b) zoning, building code and other use restrictions imposed by governmental authority; (c) outstanding oil, gas and mineral interests of record, if any; (d) restrictions, reservations and easements common to the subdivision; and (e) that certain Ground Lease as evidenced by the memorandum recorded in Official Records Book 4312, Page 1257, the Public Records of Collier County, Florida, as amended from time to time. TOGETHER with all the tenements, hereditaments and appurtenances thereto belonging or in anywise appertaining. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD, the same in fee simple forever. And said Grantor does hereby fully warrant the title to said land, and will defend the same against lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. * "Grantor" and "Grantee" are used for singular or plural, as context requires. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Grantor has hereunto set Grantor's hand and seal the day and year first above written. Packet Pg. 339 OR 5841 PG 825 9.C.3 Signed, sealed and delivered in our presence: Witnesses to signature: nt oil (A C. L D � Wifffe"ss-ff 1 Signature BLC Naples LLC, a Florida limited liability company By:'(Oz///�AK D glas R. Bartholomew, Manager 61 I Witness 42 Signature ��R. �� ..�A h r (s Witness #2 Printed Name State of Florida County of Collier The foregoing instrument was ac edged before me e n physical presence or online notarization, thi5� day of Oc 2020 by D glas �[ ] omew, Manager of BLC Naples LLC, a Florida limited liability co m o is perso wn or has produced a driver's license as identification. ` r. [Notary Seal] Not ublic ALICIAM. ROSA r �} MY COMMISSION # GG 222335 Po T EXPIRES: May 26 2022 Bonded Thru Notary Public Uhderwaters P�.oavwru Printed Name: �4 My Commission Expires: Warranty Deed (Statutory Form) - Page 2 Packet Pg. 340 *** OR 5841 PG 826 *** 9.C.3 EXHIBIT "A" (Legal Description of the Property) The South 1/2 of the NW 1/4 of Section 14, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. LESS AND EXCEPT THE FOLLOWING: The East 1/2 of the East 1/2 of the SE 114 of the NW 1/4 of Section 14, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. AND The West 100 feet of the South 1/ f t of Section 14, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County,'. AND A parcel of land located in po yin 0 S uth, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, being mo e p cul A es i s o w : ommence at the Northwest corner of Section 14, Towna Eas, 11 ounty, Florida; thence run S 00149' 12" W along the ne of the Northwe qua er id Section 14, for a distance of 1,338.98 feet to a point on orth line of the S al a Northwest quarter of said Section 14; thence run N 87° ' E along the No �jC e South half of the Northwest quarter of said Section 14, for `d' nce of 1,593.2 ef46 the Point of Beginning of the Parcel of land herein described; the 39" E along the North line of the South half of the Northwest quarter oiti 4, for a distance of 745.63 feet to a point on the East line of the West half of the East half of the Southeast quarter of the Northwest quarter of said Section 14; thence run S 00048'18" W along the East line of the West half of the East half of the Southeast quarter of the Northwest quarter of said Section 14, for a distance of 1,341.33 feet to a point on the South line of the Northwest quarter of said Section 14; thence run S 87031'14" W along the South line of the Northwest quarter of said Section 14, for a distance of 883.82 feet; thence run N 00048'13'1 E for a distance of 213.59 feet; thence run N 22019'04" W for a distance of 94.95 feet; thence run N 00018'59" E for a distance of 216.38 feet; thence run N 87°28'12" E for a distance of 172.03 feet; thence run N 66003138" E for a distance of 117.91 feet; thence run N 00032114" E for a distance of 441.42 feet; thence run S 87028'12" W for a distance of 80.31 feet; thence run N 02°31'00" W for a distance of 335.86 feet to the Point of Beginning. c a� c a� E Q a. 0 LO 0 co 0 Packet Pg. 341 9.C.3 Lo ab U_ O J !L W J J O U jQ[jQUFj nnnn n n CLUB ESTATES DR SUBJECT SITE �� IJ a� a� n a0 LORDS WAY n n � n — RATTLESNAKE HAMMOCK RD ci 1 J 00 W J J O U 0 500 1000 El 1 SUBJECT SITE SCALE IN FEET Rim Encore Way CHECKED : 7R02ECTNapleple s, FL. 34110 EXHIBIT IV.D.1 2AC 2019.0.076 () 254-2000 COLLIER BLVD LORD'S WAY DRAWN BY : CAD FILE NAME: HOLE MONTES Florida Certificate of MIXED USE SUBDISTRICT MK GMPA ENGINEERS -PLANNERS- SURVEYORS Authorization No.1772 DATE : EXHIBIT -ITEM INSET NSET Packet Pg. 342 �ast $ z L 7E �p ® e | i§ § CO _ * » i/ ! § �y ) ym ) w� . (Gm 2) c2 9mm ) Packet Pg. 343 - - - -- -- w a U N W CO W ~¢ o 4 Z) y LL Z Iff 1 u p W ++ r (n J WEx ai E W �p iEd J aik- g5 J Q J W N � O Q J >Q W co W _ cn X W U W CO 312081" m N�E!Z Q :.7 LO O LD O Packet Pg. 344 (196 a0) GA1G 21 1100 9.C.3 s £o�M e Mg gad m as >Q HO mz _z =o x w H U p � J Q p Co Co W o to _1 0: w J O (n O�� U p w X_ 2 1 E Q aC. 'C V LO 0 w 0 CN w16,:01 oZOZ,d Packet Pg. 345 0 Z W W J I I I 00 N Lo F` W Q W Q Q J n L Q uj z WM W Fn W _- U I w Co D - L96 'b'O 1 1 Q O Lo W O U � Q J[GAIEIV l Md S ViNVS m CC) Z// OC Q vi ad02i N?Jb8 J1Nfl0O ❑ C� U (n Q m w Q U m D L Q Z O CY D N J Q w r Z (n W Q pi W U ~ W > U FW"' m 2:Q LijN W W O Q Z J W U J J F_ U w } H Q Q C) 2 U Z Z 0 J Q O J 0 W >� Li Z O W (�� J QZ U Q� ❑ W ❑ W 0 w (�j J >O mN m Q ; �� HO O C)Q W} w W .JQ (W/ �F- N W Q^ D CL W J = F- W .J � J Z U N Q Q > ' F- J C)N OU Z OU m Z D p ' Z- Iai Z Z Q❑ U1 DOE H■ ❑❑■❑❑■ a QC T G mw Co J 2 W X 0: w = F- D w 1I G d 2 C Lo 0 w CD -6*b, W Packet Pg. 346 9.C.3 ti '.all 1 �F xn E1 W ¢ W waw Gi m �fL zW Packet Pg. 347 1 9) LL ILL w O y F Z 7 O U Z O U x O CL uwj 0 W S Z 2 W H, Co LLI F J V LU U w Co a W J J U m ; Z O V O a H U Q w U W W Oa a LL �pW J OQ W W a rD of U Z O Z F 3 -WW LL a JW wa 3V Zm � W F H Co 3 W Q VO O Q W Z �a WS aOS a0 U-aU w Cwx W VU H v W U LU Co H J U > x a N JS CL (0 U) w Z w a w O w LL LL wC p a W € H � F- LU j n ut �P+e,fl P71 §Y9 al j PH ue6,°W g J c Z \ ES v O 2ML y w E M\� z auo s.. Pnlg�aill�� aU1-, PI �uu Pa6„ x = J Q o Z O, p '� J w w i a z s LL V = I U o 'figrlP y= N 'j,.riy Of p}07FI'IF,i..� V FU Z — — N z 9 0 LL U LL U O Y Y Z ifW 'IV All°d W - W O CL Q J W Sandy Li _ ti J v ` canes y 4UOJF Z U o -off o _goo °, 3 U• _� W h r^lela<., _- c _r�n F-LU Z N] �G ✓� iu aplsv�uno A E - 8 i } 1 ° W F O J Y W O �0�Q Ir W aw w00 • J � anysenal� S 9.C.3 Ti-h a Q W 04 . F- W J > U H LL COW 2 > X Of W W (n U J Co a w O ALL, oA F U p J Q p CO Co LU W 0 fn JC)(A O D U p W X Packet Pg. 348 1 � 'Rrya Np ii g� H Z �o g38A a$ c �g U Z 2 0 T 0 U 1. R 1 Q U n$~ W Z O H N W �un� �a ��$s UU❑ LLI LU WZ U' \ �Tg JA- Ea o Ww — Co❑ p O Q ❑ J o� $s� € 8t €a d a v QCO LL w Om �� a z c �ppo aka F� � a �5t U J <d«E $c g'E$ 8 -N U- a�N� EK_ o f3E W RZ sg� �a � a His�� E I o �� a $� U) vr., L z 9 E %—a 8 o. 0 u° � Y� Q 2..-E Co z zvAaz NNN N N Nz NF z z Nz J z O 0 w o Z N N O N 9.C.3 y€ o N � � � a s m N s NEU Q 1:a lL Q LO > w H � N COCD 0 2 N C X N E WLL Packet Pg. 349 psi ror ozoz 'r 9.C.3 UPDATED RESIDENTIAL MARKET STUDY FOR FIRST ASSEMBLY MPUD IN COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA February 10, 2021 Prepared for Lord's Way Apartments, LLC & 3805 TLW, LLC C/O Mr. David Torres 7742 Alico Road Ft. Myers, FL 33912 Prepared by $oil Planning —Ex—tl n—R,ault, Real Estate Econometrics, Inc. Real Estate Econometrics, Inc. Suite 100 707 Orchid Drive Naples, Florida 34102 (239) 269-1341 Ree-i.com Background Ff E E a a LO 0 w 0 rl Packet Pg. 350 9.C.3 BACKGROUND Lord's Way Apartments, LLC and 3805 TLW, LLC ("Applicant") are submitting an application to amend the First Assembly Ministries Education & Rehabilitation Campus MPUD, Ordinance 2015-55, to rename the PUD to the Collier Boulevard Lord's Way MPUD ("Subject Property") and to allow for an additional 384 multi- family dwelling units and/or an assisted living facility at a FAR of 0.60. There are no proposed changes to Tract G which allows for 296 multi -family dwelling units and accessory uses or to Tract E, the preserve. Tract A currently allows for 10 multi -family units for church employees. Collier County ("County") staff has requested a residential market study for the Subject Property. The Applicant has retained Real Estate Econometrics, Inc. ("Consultant") to prepare a residential market study ("Residential Study") for the proposed 384 multi -family and/or single family attached residential units. The Consultant is well -versed in preparing real estate market studies and needs analysis especially in the Southwest Florida marketplace. The Residential Study is comprised of three sections; the Subject Property attributes, County population growth and the multi -family and single family attached residential unit market analysis. (Rest of Page Left Intentionally Blank) c c a� E Q a c� LO 0 W 0 N Packet Pg. 351 9.C.3 1.0 Subiect Property Attributes E The Subject Property is located on the north and east side of Collier Boulevard at the corner of Collier Boulevard and The Lord's Way in Section 14 — Township 50 — Range 26 and is comprised of 68.78 +/- acres. An aerial locator photo (Figure 1 Q a. below) is followed by a summary of the Subject Property's legal, location, zoning, 2 and land use attributes obtained from the Collier County Property Appraiser 0 website on the next page. o to 0 Figure 1. Proposed Collier Boulevard Lord's Way MPUD Location Map Source: ESRI ArcMap 10.8 2 Packet Pg. 3 2 9.C.3 Parcel NIM 1 r BIIN �nlrRrnadre3 Panel No 00116S.— ai to Addreu•O':clal ner 3805 THE LORDS WAV Sim City HAPIES SHe Zone ,Fuota 31111 Nam• / Add—, 6LC NAPLES LLC 2626 TARFLOWER WAY City NA11.E5 S.I. FL Zip 3.1DS Map No. f0l9 No. s.Cllon T.wmhip Range A— •E .red 5611 of0100002561. 11 SO 26 13.31 Legal 145026W1/2O1F51/20FN1N1/1, W1/20FE1/2 OF S1/1 OFNW1/1, W1/20F E1/2 OF E1/1 OFSI/20F NW1/1 LESS R/W, LESS OR39%F63363 Millagw_AnaO 39 MIOag_aZam4b Sub./Condo t%-ACREAGEHEADER 5Chool Oth. Total LFa•_Cod•.0 TI • CHURCHES 5.016 62921 flaw Latest Sales History 2020 Certified Tax Roll IHot all Sala n.11rted du. m <aMtlmtlAlryi If�b.+b CM1,�a•� Dnm Book -Pap. Amoum Land Velu. 03/26/19 ----- 5- --- __.._ - ... 50 1•: Improved Value ft1/7.fff, 0a/09/11 11/Oa/f0 502f-Sf06 1622.2311 7l,600,000 S5.m.000 1_1 M•rk•t Wlu• _. fl,T3slfl 09/29/05 3A 14M 'a I.I Na•sud Wlu• f 3.T]3.6N OS/15/96 2163•t616 f301.900 t-i 5Chool Tauble Yalw 3o 0E/0t/% 1519-1SS6 S150,000 _i Ta•abk Value f 0 06/01/61 'f_2222 365,060 Mm Vam..ahamr a6n.e9ual O 1, Panel war warod atw ma iMal to Roll Parcel 2 Property Summary®� —.l No 0%1%00100 fib Add,—MbdjlMK 3713 al— LJMU9ORE fib C2ly MApl8 f9b Senl!tp imm Nam•/Addr•sa MLLANDLW 7742 ALIGO RD City FT MYE" Star. FL ZIP 33912 Map No. 5Dap No, 5•SUon Township Pang. Acres_EELDI1Ld 5R14 000100053 Sal. 11 30 26 23.65 1.19a114W26THATFORr10NOFf1/20FNW1/1A306C1Ncw3 K3I MiW90At%� 39 Milll,.R -0 •CxlCulationF 5ub./Cunde 100-ACILEAGEHEADER 5<hool Other Tnml yMtatltO 3-MULTI-FAMILY IU UNITS OR MORE 5.016 6.2924 11.1064 Latest Sales History 2020 Certified Tax Roll nkt.n s.kt e. aw d,» m cenmmn.IMl Haq.r. ra cwy.l Dab Book-Pg. Amoum Land Vale. f f,Tl1,H0 /0/IS/15 - 520i3519 32.655,000 I.1 W,—d Value f 35.0 4447 l0/1l/ls s:uast3 f o 1-1 M•h•L V•w. _i illl2s.f6Tl os/oz/n 0120/1. f6T9-612 201@321E s2,000,000 "It•1 A—d Wu. _. __..__ _.. ibl.bEf,61T.1 10/I1/05 S1209% .33 Sfa%.000 (-1 Sdroal Taaabk Nlw flltl3,M1 11 al Wlun rM1wn Ka. ry 9i P. Iwx waiN.On N. Fivl la. aali 3 Packet Pg. 3 3 9.C.3 1.1 2.0 Location Analysis The Subject Property's strategic location allows reasonable access to the site from Collier Boulevard and provides for an ideal location for residential activities. As noted above, the Subject Property is strategically located to accommodate the proposed residential uses. Figure 1 previously shows the location of the Subject Property. FLORIDA AND COUNTY POPULATION GROWTH Overview of Florida Population Florida is currently the nation's fourth most populous state, home to an estimated 21.8 million people according to the Census Bureau. By the year 2030, Florida's population is projected to total 24.4 million people according to the medium range series from the University of Florida's Bureau of Economic and Business Research. This represents an increase of 260,000 per year. Florida's population growth is depicted in Figure 2 below. This shows the latest projections of growth by county for the year 2030. As you can see, the most heavily populated counties in Florida are Broward, Miami -Dade and Palm Beach counties in Southeast Florida; Hillsborough and Pinellas counties in the Tampa metro market; Orange County in Central Florida, and Duval County in the Jacksonville metro area. Figure 2 2030 Population Projections by County Florida Counties Population Projections 2030 O 100,000 -1- ® 12W 001 - 250,000 _ 50,001 - 500,000 - 500,001-1,000.000 - 1.000,001 + Source: University of Florida Bureau of Economic and Business Research 4 Packet Pg. 354 9.C.3 2.1 Overview of Collier County Population Growth Currently, there are an estimated 383,166 people living year-round in Collier County. Since the 2000 Census, the County's population has increased by nearly 45%, the equivalent of 115,074 new residents as shown in Table 1 below. Looking ahead, the County will continue to gain new residents at a rate greater than that of the state of Florida. By the year 2045, the population of Collier County is projected to total 569,322 residents. This is a projected annual growth rate of just over 2% from 2015 to 2040 compared to Florida's annual growth rate of 1.08% during the same time period. Table 1. Collier County Projected Population Growth Countywide Total Population Growth 2000 2010 2014 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 Permanent Population Estimates and Forecasts 257,926 322,653 340,293 347,002 383,166 416,607 446,284 484,017 524,939 569,322 5-year Percent Increase 7.55% 10.42% 8.73% 7.12% 8.45% 8.45% 8.45% 2.14% = Average Annual Growth Rate between 2015 and 2045 8.45% = Average 5-Year Growth between 2010 and 2030 to forecast 2035-2045 Source: Collier County Comprehensive Planning Section Population growth in Collier County is primarily due to the in -migration of the ongoing arrival of baby boomer retirees. The number of baby boomers reaching retirement age will peak in the early 2020s. 3.0 MULTI -FAMILY AND SINGLE FAMILY ATTACHED MARKET ANALYSIS Proposed Product Market Impact Analysis The Applicant is proposing the development of 384 multi -family and/or single family attached dwelling units on the Subject Property. Those units would consist of multi -family dwelling units, townhomes or other single family attached product or assisted living facility units. The Consultant reviewed the requested unit type and the Collier County market for those unit types to determine the pricing potential and the possible effect those units will have on the total multi -family market supplies. 5 c E c a� E Q c� LO 0 W 0 N Packet Pg. 355 9.C.3 In order to determine the pricing potential and the impact of the proposed units would have on the Collier County market for those products, the Consultant utilized E data provided by Metrostudy, Inc. from the 1st quarter of 2020, the most current c data available at the time of this report. That data is shown in Appendices A and B E for multi -family and single family attached product. The Consultant also relied Q upon data from the United States Housing and Urban Development median 2 income calculation for Collier County to determine the median income level as shown in Appendix C. o 0 3.1 Multi -Family and Single Family Attached Pricing and Inventory Market Conditions Multi -family and single family attached product pricing in Collier County is averaging between $207,740 to $324,900 per unit according to the Metrostudy reports. The majority of those units are in garden type multi -family complexes which includes buildings of 8 or more units and single family attached units. The overall average price for a new multi -family and single family attached product in Collier County is $71,934. Table 2 below shows the competitive new product and pricing considered in the pricing market conditions. Table 2. Collier County Multi -Family and Single Family Attached New Product and Pricing Product Type: Units per Building: Townhome 2 Coach 4 Garden 8+ Average Price Total Value Units Lennar- Bent Creek Preserve 138 $266,999 $36,845,862 138 Lennar -Orange Blossom Ranch (35x142) 166 $235,499 $39,092,834 166 Lennar-Orange Blossom Ranch (20x110) 116 $213,499 $24,765,884 116 DR Horton - Naples Reserve/Coral Harbor 150 $300,990 $45,148,500 150 Sobel Co - Vanderbilt Reserve Townhomes 212 $321,890 $68,240,680 212 Del Webb - Ave Maria 112 $207,740 $23,266,880 112 Taylor Morrison - Esplanade 168 $269,900 $45,343,200 168 Taylor Morrison - Esplanade 112 $269,900 $30,228,800 112 Neal Communities - Richmond Park 104 $289,900 $30,149,600 104 WCI Lennar - LaMorada 84 $324,900 $27,291,600 84 Totals: 782 84 496 $370,373,840 1,256 Average Price: $273,777 $324,900 $260,057 Overall Average Price: $271,934 Source: MetroStudy Report, 1s' Quarter 2020 Packet Pg. 356 9.C.3 The Consultant next reviewed the potential income levels that could afford housing c in the $207,740 to $324,900 price range and starting with the County's median E income. The County's median income is $82,340 according to the U.S. Housing c and Urban Development Department as shown in Appendix C. Using the County's E median income, the Consultant then calculated the moderate -income levels to Q a. determine the potential price range for the Subject Property. Table 3 below shows 2 those calculations. LO 0 Table 3. Collier County Moderate Income levels and related sales prices N Percent Median Monthly Median Household 10% Down Affordable Mortgage Income Income Price @ 30% Pmt. Sales Price Payment* 120% $98,808 $329,360.00 $32,936.00 $362,296.00 $1,388.60 100% $82,340 $274,466.67 $27,446.67 $301,913.33 $1,157.16 80% $65,872 $219,573.33 $21,957.33 $241,530.67 $925.73 * - Assumes 10% down and a 3% interest rate. Source: U.S. Housing and Urban Development Department and Consultant Based on the new multi -family and single family attached product pricing levels in the County and the median income of the County, the range of potential prices for the Subject Property would fall between $240,000 to $360,000 per residential unit as shown in Table 4 below. Table 4. Subject Property Potential Price Range Lower Range Upper Range $240,000 $360,000 Source: Consultant 3.2 All Multi -Family (Including Single Family Attached) Building Permit Data The multi -family (including single family attached permit data for the County has followed the economic upturns and downturns over the past two decades. Graph 1 on the next page shows that multi -family and single family attached building permits were in excess of 2,500 units per year from 2000 to 2005. That was fueled by investors buying and selling units at rates not seen in the County. When the real estate bubble burst starting in 2006 and running through 2012, building permits starting running in the 350 permits per year range. Once the real estate market came out of the bubble burst around 2013, the market reached equilibrium at a 1,000 multi -family and single family attached building permit average for the past 8 years. 7 Packet Pg. 357 9.C.3 3.3 Graph 1. All Collier County Multi -Family (Including Single Family Attached) Annual Building Permit Data 4,500 4,000 3,500 3,000 2,500 2,000 1,500 1,000 500 0 00 O1 OL ", OA Oh O0 1 Orb c, §1 yv yL ,y'3 yo yh `3 y1 ti� ti� ti0 ,LO .LO .y0 .LO .�0 If.LO .ti0 .LO .LO .LO ,y0 .LO .y0 .LO .y0 .LO .y0 .LO ,LO ,y0 Source: U.S. Housing and Urban Development's State of the Cities Data Systems COUNTY MULTI -FAMILY AND SINGLE FAMILY ATTACHED SUPPLY / DEMAND ANALYSIS WITH SUBJECT PROPERTY The current 1st Quarter 2020 market conditions for Collier County multi -family and single-family attached units is based on rolling quarterly averages and shows that there are currently 1,027 annual multi -family starts and 792 annual closings. The previous section noted that recent multi -family and single-family attached building permit data for the County is in the 1,000 units per year. Market forces are considered to be in equilibrium in that the laws of supply and demand determine the amount of multi -family unit inventory to address the demand for those units. Current market conditions dictate that the market requires 235 units over the demand for those units to keep the market in equilibrium. Table 5 on the next page shows those figures. c E E a a. 2 0 LO 0 W 0 N Packet Pg. 358 9.C.3 Table 5. Current Collier County Multi -Family and Single Family Attached Market Conditions E Market Conditions - 1st Quarter 2020 Q Annual Starts 1,027 Annual Closings 792 0 Annual Added Inventory for Stabilization 235 c Vacant Developed Units 1,723 c Future Inventory 2,611 Vacant Developed Units Supply (Months) 20.1 c Total Units Supply (Months) 30.5 d E Total Units Inventory 50.64 U Source: MetroStudy Single Family and Condominium Reports, 1 st Quarter 2020 Table 5 also shows the inventory is also comprised of 1,723 vacant developed multi -family units (not necessarily built — could be in planning and permitting stages) and 2,611 future multi -family units. Those units combined total 4,334 vacant and future units. Based on 1,027 annual multi -family unit starts, the Collier County inventory of multi -family and single family attached units will be depleted by the year 2024 as shown in Table 6 below. Table 6. Future Collier County Multi -Family and Single Family Attached Market Inventory 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Vacant Developed Units 1,723 1,027 1,027 1,027 1,027 1,027 1,027 Annual Starts 1,027 1,027 1,027 1,027 1,027 1,027 1,027 Remaining Vacant Developed Units 696 0 0 0 0 0 0 Remaining Future Inventory 2,611 2,280 1,253 226 -801 -1,828 -2,855 Source: MetroStudy Report, 1 st Quarter 2020 When the Subject Property's 384 multi -family units are added to the future inventory, the inventory depletion year remains at 2024. The approval of the Subject Property's 384 multi -family units will increase the future inventory by 23.5% in that year if all units are built at the same time and will reduce the provision of available units in 2024 as shown in Table 7 on the next page. However, there will still be a deficit of available units if none are brought to market before 2024. Packet Pg. 359 9.C.3 Table 7. Collier County Multi -Family and Single Family Attached Market Inventory with Subject Site Units Added E 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 E Q Vacant Developed Units 1,723 1,027 1,027 1,027 1,027 1,027 1,027 a Annual Starts 1,027 1,027 1,027 1,027 1,027 1,027 1,027 0 Remaining Vacant Developed Units 696 0 0 0 0 0 0 c Remaining Future Inventory 2,611 2,280 1,637 610 -417 -1,444 -2,471 c Subject Property Units 384 N Source: MetroStudy Report, 1 sc Quarter 2020 and Consultant The data indicates that the Subject Property's 384 units will not adversely affect the Collier County residential multi -family and single family attached market and provide a portion of units needed to fulfill the future demand for multi -family and single family attached units in Collier County thus prolonging the market for an additional year. 10 Packet Pg. 360 9.C.3 APPENDIX A CN 11 C E 7 V O Q Y V R m U a U U LO r r O O O O O N O N J a E 0 J L _(D �0 W L d c m E t c� R a Packet Pg. 3 1771 9.C.3 LO 0 ILO N Housing Analysis a L Competitive Analysis Collier Condo Naples Condo 1 Q20 metrostud Sales:1-800-227-8839 Aban1iy Packet Pg. 362 9.C.3 c as Table of Contents E a 2 Area of Interest (Map) �? LO 0 Housing Summary By Housing Type N Historical Housing Activity Price Range Analysis Lot Size Analysis Production Builder Ranking Quarterly Plan Summary Price vs. Square Footage - XY Scatter Future Lot Inventory metrostud Sales:1-800-227-8839 Ah'"ie Packet Pg. 363 9.C.3 Y� Co.- L. O 0 i El .6 - to IN� CL 117 w i�N M .G °°Li �� a II1 0o W I 4 U .. mrt1 C � �� fU f�p _ ---at Li m 0.0 " G FOL %p w � 0.j J 0 t I ry X l s c A 3ya1� v J4 6`1 N C w� Packet Pg. 364 9.C.3 Housing Summary By Housing Type Collier Condo Selection Totals By Quarter 1Q188 2�Q188 3�Q18 4Q18 3Q19 4Q19 1Q200 2Q19�� Rate/Supply �1Q199 Starts 1=l F l I__ - I� t_J 1= J l- 0 '. 0 I jAnnual Closings�0] C C OI V I �� C 01 I 0' ] 0� Single Family _� Housing Inv r 0il �6 1 i 01 1 r 0.0] __� (Lr "�1 jE . �oII (L�_ 11 _7_ jI-�._. �0� VDL InvU L-_=1 L O t-_._J � J =0 L 1 �� L-A jl L __� Starts � O �0 �0 F0 F� I l f� � ClosingsC -� C_.__� �0 �0 �0 C_ C_OI TH/Plex/Other Housing Inv C 1 L-I h 01 � 0.0 VDL InvI I�[0 =5C 0 _ 0.0 Starts I 245 j 44J =70J 37 59 214 E69J C 1911, 1 84 I 558 Closings) 95 38 57 57 77 119 88 C 821 98 l 387 Condominium i I -8 �� r , F Housing Inv 492 498 511 491 473 568 549 658 644 20.0 mos Released 1 734; 742' 678] 753 726 818 855 1,020 [_ 1,060 22.8, mos By Profile Vacant Survey Equip Exca- Street Streets Occ Mod FN U/C Tllnv VDL Fut Land Stakes on Site vation Paving In Total Single Family 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TH/Plex/Other 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Condominium 1,508 36 18 590 644 1,060 2,061 1,003 64 392 602 0 0 5,273 Totals 1,508 36 18 590 644 1,060 2,061 1,003 64 392 602 0 0 5,273 By Price Range Min Price $0 $201,000 $301,000 $401,000 $501,000 $601,000 $701,000 $1001,000 Max Price $200,999 $300,999 $400,999 $500,999 $600,999 $700,999 $1000,999 $99,999,999 Total Single Family Ann Starts 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TH/Plex/Other Ann Starts 0 80 18 0 2 38 12 0 150 Condominium Ann Starts 3 161 57 60 1 3 123 0 408 Totals 3 241 75 60 3 41 135 0 558 By Lot Size Min Lot Front < 50 50 55 60 65 70 80 90 > Max Lot Front N/A 54 59 64 69 79 89 Total Single Family Ann Starts 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TH/Plex/Other Ann Starts 150 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 150 Condominium Ann Starts 408 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 408 Totals 558 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 558 By Base Price Single Family TH/Plex/Other Condominium 2Q19 Averages Price Sqft $/SF 3Q19 Averages Price Sqft $/SF 4Q19 Averages Price Sqft $/SF 1 Q20 Averages Price Sqft $/SF $440,891 2,025 $210.79 $462,262 2,136 $214.09 $455,002 2,123 $209.88 $405,744 1,957 $202.33 Naples Condo Residential Survey (1Q20) m et rV st u d y Copyright Metrostudy Sales: 1-800-227-8839 A nanieywoed Company c a� E C d Q c.� tO O to O tV Packet Pg. 365 9.C.3 Historical Housing Activity Summary Collier Condo Qtr Ann Total Qtr Ann VDL Ann Lot Qtr Clos Clos Model FinVac UC Total Inv Supply Starts Starts VIOL Supply Fut Lots Deliv 1Q16 88 100 9 29 268 306 36.7 144 273 820 36.0 1,840 336 2Q16 27 124 14 22 268 304 29.4 25 298 795 32.0 2,056 336 3Q16 0 115 14 30 330 374 39.0 70 356 823 27.7 1,918 366 4Q16 27 142 13 34 391 438 37.0 91 330 717 26.1 2,398 279 1Q17 16 70 18 58 372 448 76.8 26 212 915 51.8 2,270 307 2Q17 127 170 18 58 323 399 28.2 78 265 829 37.5 2,656 299 3Q17 54 224 16 55 298 369 19.8 24 219 905 49.6 2,446 301 4Q17 91 288 16 47 279 342 14.3 64 192 857 53.6 2,542 332 1Q18 95 367 23 54 415 492 16.1 245 411 734 21.4 2,728 230 2Q18 38 278 23 49 426 498 21.5 44 377 742 23.6 3,012 290 3Q18 57 281 27 56 428 511 21.8 70 423 678 19.2 3,016 196 4Q18 57 247 24 62 405 491 23.9 37 396 753 22.8 2,904 292 1Q19 77 229 22 58 393 473 24.8 59 210 726 41.5 3,058 202 2Q19 119 310 20 38 510 568 22.0 214 380 818 25.8 2,333 456 3Q19 88 341 26 17 506 549 19.3 69 379 855 27.1 2,207 556 4Q19 82 366 22 18 618 658 21.6 191 533 1,020 23.0 2,253 800 1Q20 98 387 36 18 590 644 20.0 84 558 1,060 22.8 2,061 892 L, 0 800 - - - 400 (n 00) 640 -.._ _ _.._ _ - --- ._ - 300 W - 300 0 tM 320 ---- -- - - - - -- U N 160 - - -- - - - - 100 0 0 --- -- - -- - - --- - -----• 0 < 2 1016 2016 3016 4016 1017 2017 3017 4Q17 1018 2018 3018 4Q18 1Q19 2Q19 3019 4019 1020 Vacant Developed Lots and Starts By Quarter ■VDL-*-Ann.Starts i2,000 Soo 0 a) 1,200 - - -._ 400 - 800-1 - - 0 CO --.--.._� -- --�._... - �..-.._�-. 2 0 400Q 1Q16 2Q16 3Q16 4Q16 1Q17 2Q17 3017 4Q17 1Q18 2Q18 3018 4Q18 1Q19 2Q19 3Q19 4019 1020 Future Lots and Deliveries By Quarter 13RA. Lots - ♦ -Ann. Lot Deliv. 2 4,000 - -- - - ---- -- - - -- -- - -- 1,000 •- J 3,200 - -- ---- - - - - - - - - - - _. 800 m 2,400 - 1,600 -j - RM - - -- - - - 400 800 -- - - - - - - - - - -- 200 0_1 __ - -- - - -- - - 0 < 1Q16 2016 3Q16 4Q16 1Q17 2Q17 3Q17 4Q17 1Q18 2Q18 3018 4018 1Q19 2Q19 3Q19 4019 1020 Housing Inventory and Closings By Quarter ❑Fin. Vacant EjUnder Const. -*Ann. Clos. Naples Condo Residential Survey (1Q20) Copyright Metrostudy Q 0 LO C w O N metrOstudy Sales:1-800-227-8839 A h..I ywooa Company Packet Pg. 366 9.C.3 Price Range Analysis Collier Condo $0 $201,000 $301,000 $401,000 $501,000 $601,000 $701,000 $1001,000 $200,999 $300,999 $400,999 $500,999 $600,999 $700,999 $1000,999 $99999999 *Total Ann Starts 3 240 75 60 3 42 135 0 558 Custom Market Ann Closings 4 133 53 0 1 32 57 107 387 Numerical Totals Housing Inv 4 159 104 64 7 38 129 140 644 VDL Inv 45 209 353 168 54 36 142 54 1,060 Housing Supply (Mos) 11.5 14.4 23.6 1,608.0 65.2 14.5 27.0 15.7 20.0 VDL Supply (Mos) 208.0 10.4 56.2 33.5 215.3 10.5 12.6 - 22.8 Ann Starts 0.5% 43.0% 13.5% 10.8% 0.5% 7.5% 24.3% 100% Custom Market Ann Closings 1.0 % 34.4 % 13.7 % 0.1 % 0.3 % 8.2 % 14.8 % 27.5 % 100% Percentage Totals Housing Inv 0.6 % 24.7 % 16.1 % 9.9 % 1.1 % 5.9 % 20.0 % 21.7 % 100% VDL Inv 4.2% 19.7% 33.3% 15.8% 5.1% 3.4% 13.4% 5.1% 100% 50 % 0 40 % 0 � 30 % N V a 20 % 10 % 0% $0-$200 Price Range Distribution of Annual Starts vs VDL $2014300 $3014400 $4014500 $5014600 $6014700 $70141000 $1001-$99999 ❑ Annual Starts ■ VDL Price Range Distribution of Annual Closings vs Housing Inventory 35 % W 30 % 0 H G 25 % y20 % V V a 15% 10 % 5% 0% $04200 $201-$300 $3014400 $4014500 $5014600 $6014700 ❑ Annual Closings ■ Housing Inventory Naples Condo Price Range Analysis (1Q20) Copyright Metrostudy *Because this report excludes sections without pricing information, the totals may not match those shown on other summary reports. $70141000 $1001499999 C E Q IL LO 0 co 0 N metr I study Sales:1-800-227-8839 A Company Packet Pg. 3 7 9.C.3 Lot Size Analysis Collier Condo Lot Size Segment N/A < 50 50-54 55-59 60-64 65-69 70-79 80-89 90 > Total Ann Starts 558 558 Ann Closings 387 387 Custom Market Housing Inv 644 644 Numerical Totals VDL Inv 1,060 1,060 Future Inv 2,061 2,061 VDL Supply (Mos) 22.8 22.8 Ann Starts % Custom Market Ann Closings % Percentage Totals Housing Inv % VDL Inv % Future Inv % t Annual Starts, VDL, and Future Lots By Lot Size ❑ Annual Starts ■ Vacant Developed Lots ❑ Future Lots 55-59 60-64 65.69 70-79 Lot Size Segment Vacant Developed Lot Inventory By Lot Size ■ Vacant Developed Lots ■ VDL Supply Lot Size Segment Naples Condo Lot Size Analysis (1Q20) Copyright Metrostudy 9 E C E Q d 2 0 U) 0 W 0 N metrOstudy Sales: 1-800-227-8839 A na,iey.veaa Company Packet Pg. 368 9.C.3 Production Builder Ranking Collier Condo Sorted By Annual Closings Closings Rank Builder Name (Production) Section Status Price Lot Dim 2Q19 3Q19 4Q19 1Q20 Annual 1 Taylor Morrison 6 9 34 36 85 Esplanade GCC/Garden Bellano Act 4Q17 $264-$276 Ox0 1 3 24 17 45 Esplanade GCC/Garden Vercelli BO 2Q19 $299-$375 Ox0 5 0 0 0 5 Esplanade GCC/Garden Vercelli Pocida 8 Act 4Q18 $264-$276 Ox0 0 6 10 19 35 2 The Ronto Group Inc 44 22 6 2 74 Naples Square Building 2 - Coach BO 1Q20 $695-$1,550 Ox0 0 0 0 2 2 Naples Square Building 3 - Coach Act 1Q15 $630-$1,400 Ox0 44 22 6 0 72 3 Neal Communities 16 20 9 22 67 Avalon of Naples Ph 1 19 - 2 sty Act 3Q16 $290-$318 Ox0 11 17 6 5 39 Richmond Park Ph 1 Act 2Q17 $270-$298 Ox0 5 3 3 17 28 4 Gulf Bay Group of Com 35 20 4 5 64 Pelican Bay/Mystique Mystique 21 Sty Act 4Q16 $2,20048,000 Ox0 35 20 4 5 64 5 WCl/Lennar 10 13 12 18 53 LaMorada Carriage Homes Carriage Anguilla Act 2Q19 $310-$340 Ox0 0 0 0 5 5 LaMorada Carriage Homes Ph 1 BO 4Q19 $310-$340 Ox0 5 5 6 0 16 Talis Park/Viansa Carriage- Act 1Q17 $605-$797 Ox0 2 3 3 3 11 Talis Park/Viansa Carriage -Terrace 6 Act 3Q16 $605-$605 Ox0 0 5 2 10 17 Windstar/Regatta Landing Coach Act 1 Q1 8 $575-$665 Ox0 3 0 1 0 4 6 Frontdoor Commuinties 5 1 10 6 22 Talis Park/Corsica Ph 1 Coach 4 per Act 3Q15 $780-$960 Ox0 5 1 10 6 22 7 Del Webb Communities 0 2 7 3 12 Ave Maria/Del Webb Carriage Ph 1 Coach Act 1Q07 $192-$220 Ox0 0 2 7 3 12 8 Mattamy Homes 0 0 0 5 5 Arboretum Coach - 6 per Act 1 Q19 $289-$326 Ox0 0 0 0 5 5 9 Signature Communities 3 1 0 0 4 Kalea Bay Tower 100 BO 3Q19 $1,265-$1,400 Ox0 3 1 0 0 4 10 Minto Builders 0 0 0 1 1 Isles of Collier Preserve Coach Act 4Q13 $461-$545 Ox0 0 0 0 1 1 Selection Totals 119 88 82 98 387 Selection Totals (including shared/split) 387 numbers in this column are based on shared (multiple- Naples COndO Residential Survey (1Q20) et r� st u d y builder) sections; in these cases, the annual number is evenly distributed between builders in these sections Copyright Metrostudy Page 1 of 1 Sales:1-800-227-8839 A harry —.d Company Packet Pg. 369 N M Cl! N M O ? LL N fn O Efl fA EH r EA N EA (00 fA (r004 bN9 bN4 CO Efl EA N 0 O LL V (r0 O V (NO (NO Gi m m C/) N N d O O N m O O O r O O U rn C r M M N M o O O m O En co U) O (3i 0) O 4• M CD N O N N N r M N EA Efl EA (A fA EA EA EA W, EA 17 rn rn � o V LL N N o Efl Ffl Era 6p L ta co bs m 09, N r O V' V' O (0 00 > FLV (ro (NO (NO Or) O) W CD m rn V r O rn o G (r0 m rn 0) rn u 1 Cl) o N N N U M N EA Efl ER ER fA b9 EA 17 rn m r o r U. o T (A N 60 (�0 Vj CO Lr() N (fl (OO EA (A A 'IT co 00 > lL (NO (NO Cl! W Q to N .- T m rn U rn O o C) o m (on O m m /R a• M N N (r[) M N V EA Ki V3 E» w Ki m O (`i O N Lo N C •�_ m CD N N m �// O� w LL co V r m m m rn N rn V � V `V rn m v o o cc In rn '[] 0. a N M a r O) r-: O N 6) m m Vo 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 y 4) X O X CD X O xX O O X O X O X O X O X O U1 O J C N C O (n U)N N 0 Cl O O 'r � M M Co O Q U N N 0 A N N y N O O cc O O m O O O O N O C O O� y y L O N O N O O N O O L O L O O O Q O o -r o o d' Cl) = o -:5 o -L- Co V N U Z Z 0 Z 0 UJ f07 (0 �p O N N N N N N A p O ,01 p r p O O O co Cl) p M p O O M p M O O (..) M M U M U O U (M U M ,.A. U) O O O r Lo O O 7 U Cl) (p c U U U U U U U • m (o r r N v m rn Lo o f Lo F- m 2AD a 70 aN+ (0 'C (�0 N CD U O 00 O o N F M oE c c a 0 2 o o a c' `o `o mC7 > v rn a = = c m 2E � 2 a 0 c o U a o O co F a F E (7 m F- O > U o o d w c o p m Z (D LL y _ •� G) O O r N U) Q) 2U r N .0 U) ,p U (U d N U- LL. 0. m > aCL N U) Q Q Q W LLCL N m co m N mcoN ` c a `m E c E o 0) -0 � U c E m U m : m rn N m 'CD Z v A CD a a Y m a a U cc CO 0 U U c d J r N Q= (o N d E 3 u O 0 Q Packet Pg. 370 9.C.3 LL Yl 6 04 ER � N 07 _ j LL 00 (D M CO 1l- LO Q N Co rn N O O LO V U a) r o LO N LO d m w oo c Co v U�l o v o rn LL to � ocOi N En 04 N V3 64 N ffl N N C m LL LO � O Ln Cl)M o > Q N QI O N M N Cl) N d O O LO N v w U o o m o a` O 00 6q LO coo c»LL O m e» LO v s4 o.- N N N EA N (A N e4 N 64 W V) N Hi OI G y LL Q rn LO (3 N LOO m N LO M N LO M N O 0Cr Cl) M N d M O o O O O 00 O O O (3 N N Al U a` m Co co GS o Co UB, o co U� LO M Co U�l O M 7 V Un N N rn Co 6 N o a (n v/ j m a LL L d) 7 O LO m LO M O N O Q N N N N M N Co /\ N d O o O CL 0 O o 0 O O 0 m rn m lip CoV2� Co 0 Co It v O O CD O O o 0 L N N O O O O O O O J a p ` O O N N r O O V V a� r O N O O N O L O O N O L O O O O O O L O Cl Q 0 O N U U Z Z (n N N N (p N Co Q Q�1 U M U co U Ln Un o U (o 9 .�, N - CO _ S N o 0 0 U) c C) U U U oCo Co f N N CD Co co �o LO N ) N N <0 sN+ O C N N N ((O C LA 't Co E E E E E O O U 0 O zm m o co U U m U c U m Z LL N 2i Co � Q Co J c E u o t F (a ID a N J Z L O U U N a F- (Q m N a m a (n c rn o U a) N d (0 m N K N U > U m N n a m (Lj m lA to Fes- F N m N LO O w O N N r.+ C N E 3 u O 0 Q Y u m m U d U U O O O O O N O N J d V �L N �a N L J E m CD O m d O V CD E t v Q Packet Pg. 371 1 9.C.3 W O LL L Cu N V .L CL Oeud Oseg e+i 8 N O LO i R i i a� to J rn E m m U V C U N � � 00 cc 7 ` a J Ca(C) a0a Q E �N(O rn :E'N a a) a> U `° E r v co m w o E E o V U E mom.H'cCO) N E m Ev (0)U m m U c z L m m t m Z° U U a J D — m` Cu Cu m r`0 12 o E L a a a a L T fN .fn N D C Fm- E E 8 J °n m = 0 (1`) j 3 u a o cc c00U c m � m N L m U 0 V U U "0 a(L) = •_ E o t_ U CO = U j 10 U w c >�wwm E n= x o o a � -00 •0 U E LL� (0)U 0 0 a m C V c c e- n U H H E v m Z (O d m m N � 0) m m C7 (9 > Co o o U U< a p z _z 2 o -Cu m a� o n>>> N N V N QQQQwwIL a c m E C d E Q a V LO CD Packet Pg. 372 O 0 N O O O N N 0 xl oll � III � I w Li C W N U `m W O O U a>i 0 ❑ U E C ._ a W W U LL LO 00 C N 0 N Li N W 0 O Z U C 0 U N W 0 � U a Y a) U O O O O 0 0 O O O O O C. O O O r cV 0 N N CD 0 0 0 0 0 U) W 4) LLL= cu t O Z W 0 U u) w 0 0 0 U = _ R R C C c c W W * J N W R t O U � C co (Ca O C N O F > > R m Z x w = V) R Z) D LL LL Q v M R K 0 0 W O O O 0 0 O O O O Cl) (M 0 0 Y Li N 3 t 0 O Z � W 'E U E E O 0 U U W (6 rn F M W T � R � m ~ ca LL Y N 0 0 O V N O O It N 0 y w Li R W U N 0 U 0 U O 0 O d N O O v N CD 0 Li N 3 .c 0 O Z m c 0 W U 0. • W o > U W O .Q i 3 O H N y W G1 � a ❑ R ~ Z D LL c O 0 w Li N 3 U) W L C O O Z 0 `W U OCL O U 0 0 L) m W 0 0 I- U N N W Q O W N O T C) W T � R D m � c D U I a M 0 0 0l 0 0 0 ll' O O O O O O III O O O O O O LO M co 0 co 0 0 0 LO co 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 U) co y > > LL LL J J t N N O Oa •- to N o � � U c c m m w U) (W W y w O O 0 0 n. a O m m •o m i R W O H q N O c C a_ y � a a .� N W W a W D : 0 LL LL 0 O a M 0 0 O O O M LO F CO O W m 0� C p O F U LL a W w co 9.C.3 0 o E o O }1 o C d N ¢ O A 0 00 V n co N C G'^C 00 V 1 CDy Lo(•i N O N N C E u O 0 CL R Y U m m U O Q_ o U U o o m o w O O O a N CD y 3 m N W J � o Q a d 0 U V •L N m � C C U o � W (D O C U W N 0 n W O a>i J 2 L z to O m L d m O a U U CO N_ = U co R E Y U W W U U F Q O LL aLL r 0 Packet Pg. 373 O O O O O O Co CD 0 LL O O O 00 O O O 0 ti O O N O O O O N C N r C) r 7 J O J C GI 7 O J In N U fn .Q .o o o C6 m U d. U U 76 m O c O O OO U .a U U LL m � 2 0 U r f- U1 O F- C O U d N N rn ro O 11 � L r L � u � e y ? C C m i N C - C N C N C o V i v t m i Z S Packet Pg. Pg. 374 1 9.C.3 APPENDIX B CN 12 C E 7 V O Q Y V R m U a U U LO r r O O O O O N O N J a E 0 J L _(D �0 W L d c m E t c� R a Packet Pg. 3 57 9.C.3 LO 0 ILO N HousingAnalysis E 0 Competitive Analysis Collier County Y M Naples 1 Q20 metrostud Sales:1-800-227-8839 "4bar1i Packet Pg. 376 9.C.3 c as Table of Contents E a 2 Area of Interest (Map) �? LO 0 Housing Summary By Housing Type N Historical Housing Activity Price Range Analysis Lot Size Analysis Production Builder Ranking Quarterly Plan Summary Future Lot Inventory metrostud Sales:1-800-227-8839 a °an ° Packet Pg. 377 9.C.3 x, Q C- m G i i� w o . u o p 1.0 0 .� a �. ao � _ ��S w N Ln a. L a1 C a a ry. O It a 5 •t �e:�l a w n ol 13 � w Vh C W U 2 b Co a q ,qt 6i m CO ID Cu41 ru 0 Cu � } Y { . uj z OO CY}}, 4 li3 R, ,U �4 C7 c as c m Q C. C c� LO 0 w 0 N Packet Pg. 378 9.C.3 Housing Summary By Housing Type Collier County Selection Totals a� E By Quarter 1Q18 2Q18 3018 4Q18 1Q19 2Q19 3Q19 4Q19 1Q20 Annual Rate/Supply r_ Starts 366] ` 442 377 361 357 373 467 429 374 1,6431 w E Closings 3531I 368 334 L 380 355 364 389 443 394 1,5901 Q Single Family Housing Inv 936 1,010 1,0531 C 1,034 1,036 1,045 1,123 1,109 1,089 8.21 mos VDL Inv 3,675 3,467 3,149 3,252 3,405 3,567 3,491 3,239 3,170 23.21 mosLO U' (Starts 15 60 54 71 103 131 11V 153 100 4901 CD Closings 49 28 38 26 59 64 74, 138 102 37�1" O 04 TH/Plex/Other Housing Inv 89 121 137 182 226 293 330 345 343 10.91 mos to VDL Inv 350 442 564 643 789 702 826 878 784 19.0 mos r+ 0) Starts 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 E Closings 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01 to O Condominium Cl Housing Inv 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 Q Released 0 0 0( 0 L 0 0 0 0 0 0.01 R Y R By Profile Cal Vacant Survey Equip Exca- Street Streets V IZ Occ Mod FN U/C T/Inv VDL Fut Land Stakes on Site vation Paving In Total U Single Family 8,681 140 325 624 1,089 3,170 27,944 19,615 49 1 7,221 503 555 40,884 V TH/Plex/Other 828 29 87 227 343 784 1,598 632 0 59 907 0 0 3,553 Condominium 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CD Totals 9,509 169 412 851 1,432 3,954 29,542 20,247 49 60 8,128 503 555 44,437 O O O N O By Price Range Min Price $0 $201,000 $301,000 $401,000 $501,000 $601,000 $701,000 $1001,000 d Max Price $200,999 $300,999 $400,999 $500,999 $600,999 $700,999 $1000,999 $99,999,999 Total V Single Family Ann Starts 18 232 402 386 262 82 164 91 1,635 TH/Plex/Other Ann Starts 0 246 208 41 0 0 0 0 495 N Condominium Ann Starts 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 7 Totals 18 478 610 427 262 82 164 91 2,130 N By Lot Size Min Lot Front < 50 50 55 60 65 70 80 90 > >>� Max Lot Front N/A 54 59 64 69 79 89 Total N Single Family Ann Starts 3 ® 625 73 231 158 184 110 42 1,643 p TH/Plex/Other Ann Starts 26 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 495 Ji Condominium Ann Starts 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 L R Totals 29 110 625 73 231 158 184 110 42 2,138 7 O _ID m Rv Roco ri�o yy vuvy 2Q19 Averages 3Q19 Averages 4Q19 Averages 1Q20 Averages W Price Sqft $/SF Price Sqft $/SF Price Sqft $/SF Price Sqft $/SF O c.> $539,433 2,652 $198.15 $509,828 2,573 $195.11 $550,687 2,610 $205.26 $538,268 2,603 $202.78 Single Family TH/Plex/Other $333,300 1,665 $200.19 $326,750 1,657 $196.79 $330,097 1,699 $194.47 $333,726 1,703 $196.54 E Condominium V L J a Naples Residential Survey (1Q20) m et rV st u d y Copyright Metrostudy Sales: 1-800-227-8839 A n-i.r.-d Company Packet Pg. 379 9.C.3 Historical Housing Activity Summary Collier County Qtr Ann Total Qtr Ann VDL Ann Lot Qtr Clos Clos Model RnVac UC Total Inv Supply Starts Starts VDL Supply Fut Lots Deliv 1Q16 222 755 112 194 547 853 13.6 290 1,066 3,600 40.5 27,741 1,914 2Q16 221 867 134 228 589 951 13.2 319 1,119 3,753 40.2 27,074 1,537 3Q16 236 941 134 252 636 1,022 13.0 307 1,173 3,712 38.0 27,164 1,719 4Q16 275 954 142 261 603 1,006 12.7 259 1,175 3,761 38.4 28,238 1,412 1Q17 351 1,083 137 240 579 956 10.6 301 1,186 3,882 39.3 28,479 1,468 2Q17 374 1,236 140 204 664 1,008 9.8 426 1,293 3,727 34.6 29,415 1,267 3Q17 273 1,273 143 56 916 1,115 10.5 380 1,366 4,042 35.5 28,808 1,696 4Q17 401 1,399 150 167 729 1,046 9.0 332 1,439 4,074 34.0 28,914 1,752 1Q18 402 1,450 148 198 679 1,025 8.5 381 1,519 4,025 31.8 28,874 1,662 2Q18 396 1,472 152 193 786 1,131 9.2 502 1,595 3,909 29.4 30,884 1,777 3Q18 372 1,571 146 176 868 1,190 9.1 431 1,646 3,713 27.1 31,069 1,317 4Q18 406 1,576 144 207 865 1,216 9.3 432 1,746 3,895 26.8 32,116 1,567 1Q19 414 1,588 142 228 892 1,262 9.5 460 1,825 4,194 27.6 22,887 1,994 2Q19 428 1,620 142 219 977 1,338 9.9 504 1,827 4,269 28.0 24,931 2,187 3Q19 463 1,711 162 257 1,034 1,453 10.2 578 1,974 4,317 26.2 29,620 2,578 4Q19 581 1,886 155 248 1,051 1,454 9.3 582 2,124 4,117 23.3 29,883 2,346 1Q20 496 1,968 169 412 851 1,432 8.7 474 2,138 3,954 22.2 29,542 1,898 L, a 1,600 -. _..------ -- -- - --- - - - -- --- 1,500 . 0 a, goo_ - 7_71 1'�400 - __Ka _500 0-------- - ... 1 -I- -- -, - - - - -- - 0 2 1Q16 2Q16 3Q16 4Q16 1017 2017 3017 4Q17 1018 2016 3Q18 4018 1019 2Q19 3019 4019 1020 Vacant Developed Lots and Starts By Quarter ■VDL-*-Ann.Starts a - 4,800 _. __ __..__ .. ...__... _-- -_- -- 2,000 a) 3,600 - - -- - - - - - - -- - 1,500 2,400 - - - - - - - - - - -- 1,000 7 1 2 0 - -- - -- - - -- - 500 1016 2Q16 3016 4016 1017 2017 3Q17 4017 1016 2018 3018 4Q18 1Q19 2Q19 3Q19 4Q19 1020 Future Lots and Deliveries By Quarter ElFut. Lots -*-Ann. Lot Deliv. cn 40,000. ----- -- 3,000 .� J _ _--- __- _ _ 2,500 m 0 32,000 1 ar 24,000 - _ - - 2,00 016,000 1,500 J 8,01,000 � o 41;- 1Q16 2Q16 3Q16 4Q16 1Q17 2Q17 3017 4Q17 1018 2Q18 3Q18 4018 1019 2Q19 3019 4Q19 1020 Housing Inventory and Closings By Quarter ❑Fin. Vacant ❑Under Const. -s Ann. Clos. Naples Residential Survey (1Q20) Copyright Metrostudy Q d 2 0 LO C w O N metrOstudy Sales:1-800-227-8839 Ananieywoadcompany Packet Pg. 380 9.C.3 Price Range Analysis Collier County $0 $201,000 $301,000 $401,000 $501,000 $601,000 $701,000 $1001,000 $200,999 $300,999 $400,999 $500,999 $600,999 $700,999 $1000,999 $99999999 *Total Ann Starts 18 477 610 427 262 82 164 91 2,130 Custom Market Ann Closings 14 415 524 415 270 104 122 99 1,963 Numerical Totals Housing Inv 5 249 375 289 214 47 130 113 1,422 VDL Inv 97 601 822 589 392 97 221 424 3,243 Housing Supply (Mos) 4.5 7.2 8.6 8.4 9.5 5.4 12.7 13.8 8.7 VDL Supply (Mos) 66.2 15.1 16.2 16.6 18.0 14.2 16.2 56.0 18.3 Ann Starts 0.8% 22.4% 28.6% 20.0% 12.3% 3.9% 7.7% 4.3% 100% Custom Market Ann Closings 0.7 % 21.2 % 26.7 % 21.1 % 13.8 % 5.3 % 6.2 % 5.0 % 100% Percentage Totals Housing Inv 0.4 % 17.5 % 26.4 % 20.3 % 15.0 % 3.3 % 9.1 % 8.0 % 100% VDLInv 3.0% 18.5% 25.3% 18.2% 12.1% 3.0% 6.8% 13.1% 100% 30 % R 25 % O H 0 20 % 15 % d n 10 % 5% 0% $0-$200 30 % Price Range Distribution of Annual Starts vs VDL $2014300 $3014400 $4014500 $5014600 $6014700 ❑ Annual Starts ■ VUL $701-$1000 $1001499999 Price Range Distribution of Annual Closings vs Housing Inventory 25 % F- O 20%- N 15 % a: a 10% - 5% 0 % - -- $0-$200 $2014300 11 $3014400 $4014500 $5014600 $6014700 ❑ Annual Closings ■ Housing Inventory Naples Price Range Analysis (1Q20) Copyright Metrostudy *Because this report excludes sections without pricing information, the totals may not match those shown on other summary reports. $70141000 $1001-$99999 metrOstudy Sales:1-800-227-8839 A ^aniey mad Company Packet Pg. 3 1771 9.C.3 Lot Size Analysis Collier County Lot Size Segment N/A < 50 50-54 55-59 60-64 65-69 70-79 80-89 90 > Total Ann Starts 29 Ann Closings 3 Custom Market Housing Inv 26 Numerical Totals VDL Inv 387 Future Inv 27,702 VDL Supply (Mos) 160.1 Ann Starts % Custom Market Ann Closings % Percentage Totals Housing Inv % VDL Inv % Future Inv % ai 50%-- .w 0 40 % - ro 30 % f� 20 % w 4 10 % - 50 800 - s B00 - 400 200 - 0- 625 73 231 158 184 110 42 2,138 631 80 171 177 167 82 64 1,968 ® 369 47 192 87 120 94 62 1,432 ® 854 135 512 173 205 252 457 3,954 442 132 108 92 261 0 0 29,542 ® 16.4 22.2 26.6 13.1 13.4 27.5 130.6 22.2 32.5% 29.6% 3.5% 11.0% 7.5% 8.7% 5.2% 2.0% 100% 30.2% 32.1% 4.1% 8.7% 9.0% 8.5% 4.2% 3.3% 100% 30.9% 26.2% 3.3% 13.7% 6.2% 8.5% 6.7% 4.4% 100% 27.4% 23.9% 3.8% 14.4% 4.9% 5.7% 7.1 % 12.8% 100% 43.8% 24.0% 7.2% 5.9% 5.0% 14.2% 100% Annual Starts, VDL, and Future Lots By Lot Size [I Annual Starts ■ Vacant Developed Lots ❑ Future Lots 50-54 55-59 6044 � Lot Size Segment 70.79 M" 90 P. Vacant Developed Lot Inventory By Lot Size ■ Vacant Developed Lots ■ VDL Supply Lot Size Segment Naples Lot Size Analysis (1 Q20) Copyright Metrostudy 140 120 w" E C E Q 1L LO 0 to 0 metro, study Sales:1-800-227-8839 A na.],�-a company Packet Pg. 382 9.C.3 Production Builder Ranking Collier County Sorted By Annual Closings Closings Rank Builder Name (Production) Section Status Price Lot Dim 2Q19 30119 40119 1Q20 Annual 1 Lennar Homes 79 86 115 100 380 Artesia/Village Homes (LC) Ph 1 Lennar Act 1 Q17 $251-$281 50x115 4 7 4 6 21 Bent Creek Preserve/SF Ph 1 Lennar- BO 4Q19 $375-$435 65x115 3 1 1 0 5 Bent Creek Preserve/SF Ph 1A Lennar - BO 2Q19 $375-$435 65x115 2 0 0 0 2 Bent Creek Preserve/SF Ph 2A -Executive Act 1 Q19 $354-$419 52x115 0 22 27 34 83 Bent Creek Preserve/SF Ph1 Lennar- BO 4Q19 $354-$419 52x115 24 4 1 0 29 Oran e Blossom Ranch ssom Ranch -Lennar Act1Q18 $230-$240 $308-$382 35x142 52x140 5 4 1 5 15 ® ® ® • Ph1B Lennar- Act1Q16 $345-$445 70x150 4 6 11 9 30 2 CC Homes 47 58 66 47 218 Ave Maria/Maple Ridge Ph 3 Coquina BO 3Q19 $221-$267 40x90 9 5 0 0 14 Ave Maria/Maple Ridge Ph 3 Estate Act 4Q14 $318-$418 65x135 2 0 1 0 3 Ave Maria/Maple Ridge Ph 4 Estate Act 4Q16 $318-$418 65x135 2 2 4 0 8 Ave Maria/Maple Ridge Ph 4 Garden BO 4Q19 $265-$341 55x135 11 4 2 0 17 Ave Maria/Maple Ridge Ph 5A Estate Act 1 Q19 $318-$418 65x135 1 6 4 2 13 Ave Maria/Maple Ridge Ph 5A Garden Act 3Q18 $267-$346 55x135 3 16 16 11 46 Ave Maria/Maple Ridge Ph 5B Cove Act 4Q18 $241-$266 45x135 6 6 3 1 16 Ave Maria/Maple Ph 1 CC Reserve Act 1Q16 $422-$503 90x140 3 4 2 2 11 Ave Maria/Maple Ph 2 CC Reserve BO 4Q19 $422-$503 90x138 2 0 1 0 3 Ave Maria/Maple Ph 1-Silverwood Act 2Q19 $220-$270 40x140 0 6 20 20 46 Fronterra Ph 1 Act 1Q18 $285-$371 42x70 8 9 9 0 26 Fronterra Ph 2 Act 3Q19 $285-$371 42x70 0 0 4 11 15 numbers in this column are based on shared (multiple- Naples Residential Survey (1 Q20) m et r� st u d y builder) sections; in these cases, the annual number is evenly distributed between builders in these sections Copyright Metrostudy Page 1 of 6 Sales: 1-800-227-8839 Ah—I.y. ood Company Packet Pg. 383 9.C.3 Production Builder Ranking Collier County Sorted By Annual Closings Closings Rank Builder Name (Production) Section Status Price Lot Dim 2Q19 3Q19 4Q19 1Q20 Annual 3 Pulte 37 47 50 51 185 Ave Maria/Avalon Park Ph 1 -Cottage Act 3Q17 $245-$291 45x135 0 2 1 1 4 Ave Maria/Avalon Park Ph 1 -Discovery Act 1 Q19 $244-$271 52x135 0 2 2 2 6 Ave Maria/Avalon Park Ph 1 -Manor Act 3Q17 $287-$352 52x135 0 2 1 2 5 Ave Maria/Avalon Park Ph 2 Ellington Act 1Q19 $300-$440 70x135 0 6 2 0 8 Ave Maria/Avalon Park Ph 2 Ellington Act 1Q19 $287-$352 52x135 0 1 1 2 4 Ave Maria/Avalon Park Unit 7 -Manor Act 2Q11 $300-$440 70x140 0 1 7 1 9 Fiddlers Ph 1 Act 4Q17 $387-$449 40x150 3 5 5 11 24 Greyhawk at Golf Club of the Ph 1 Estate Act 3Q15 $502-$544 65x135 0 1 0 0 1 Greyhawk at Golf Club of the Ph 1 Manor Act 4Q15 $399-$417 50x135 3 3 6 6 18 Greyhawk at Golf Club of the Ph 1 B Estate Act 2Q16 $502-$544 65x135 3 0 1 0 4 Greyhawk at Golf Club of the Ph 1 B Manor Act 2Q16 $399-$417 50x135 0 0 1 2 3 Greyhawk at Golf Club of the Ph 1 B Premier Act 4Q15 $549-$625 75x135 2 1 1 1 5 Greyhawk at Golf Club of the Ph 2 Estate Act 2Q17 $502-$544 65x135 2 2 7 6 17 Greyhawk at Golf Club of the Ph 2 Manor Act 3Q17 $399-$417 50x135 0 1 0 0 1 Greyhawk at Golf Club of the Ph 2 Premier Act 2Q17 $549-$625 75x135 1 5 2 1 9 Greyhawk at Golf Club of the Ph 3 Estate Act 1Q19 $502-$544 65x135 1 0 0 2 3 Greyhawk at Golf Club of the Ph 3 Manor Act 4Q18 $399-$417 50x135 2 2 2 5 11 Greyhawk at Golf Club of the Ph 3 Premier Act 1 Q19 $549-$625 75x135 4 1 2 0 7 Orange Blossom Ranch Ph 2A-Pulte Act 1Q18 $296-$362 52x140 10 5 6 4 25 Orange Blossom Ranch Ph 2A -Pulte Act 2Q18 $348-$400 62x140 6 7 3 5 21 c d C E Q d 2 0 LO 0 to 0 numbers in this column are based on shared (multiple- Naples Residential Survey (1 Q20) m et r� St u d y builder) sections; in these cases, the annual number is evenly distributed between builders in these sections Copyright Metrostudy Page 2 of 6 sales: 1-800-227-8839 A ha.ieywood Company Packet Pg. 384 9.C.3 Production Builder Ranking Collier County Sorted By Annual Closings Closings Rank Builder Name (Production) Section Status Price Lot Dim 2Q19 3Q19 4Q19 1Q20 Annual 4 Taylor Morrison 36 52 40 47 175 Esplanade at Hacienda PH 3 Lucello Terr Act 1Q19 $272-$272 35x125 0 0 3 0 3 Esplanade at Hacienda Ph 4 -Calle Act 1Q19 $272-$272 35x125 0 0 0 1 1 Esplanade at Hacienda Ph 1 Palacio NW - Act 2Q14 $354-$451 52x130 0 3 0 0 3 Esplanade at Hacienda Ph 1A/B replat Act 3Q17 $381-$453 62x130 1 1 1 0 3 Esplanade at Hacienda Ph 2A Sevilla Ct - Act 4Q17 $354-$451 52x130 1 2 4 3 10 Esplanade at Hacienda Ph 2B Volaro Way BO 2Q19 $319-$334 42x130 1 0 0 0 1 Esplanade at Hacienda Ph 3 La Palma Act 2Q19 $381-$453 62x130 0 0 0 2 2 Esplanade GCC/La Palma Galliano Ct BO 3019 $477-$564 62x147 1 1 0 0 2 Esplanade GCC/La Palma Ph 3 Livornio Ct BO 4019 $477-$564 62x149 4 2 1 0 7 Esplanade GCC/La Palma Ph 4 Rapallo ST Act 4Q17 $477-$564 62x150 2 12 9 3 26 Esplanade GCC/Novelli Ph 1 Dilillo & Act 2Q17 $440-$503 52x150 3 7 5 0 15 Esplanade GCC/Novelli Ph 1 Terrasina Dr Act 1Q16 $440-$503 52x144 2 3 0 0 5 Esplanade GCC/Novelli Ph 3 Esplanade Act 4Q17 $440-$503 52x138 6 8 6 9 29 Esplanade GCC/Novelli Ph 5 Montlonic & Act 3Q19 $440-$503 52x150 0 0 0 6 6 Esplanade GCC/Torino Ph 2 - Cavano St BO 1Q20 $636-$669 76x150 0 0 3 3 6 Esplanade GCC/Torino Ph 4 Rapallo St BO 1Q20 $636-$669 76x150 6 3 1 1 11 Esplanade GCC/Torino Ph 5 Tulipano Act 1Q19 $636-$669 76x150 0 0 0 8 8 Fiddlers Creek/Oyster Harbor Ph 1 La Palma - BO 1Q20 $498-$579 60x140 0 4 0 3 7 Fiddlers Creek/Oyster Harbor Ph 1 Tornio - std Act 4Q14 $694-$725 75x140 4 0 3 3 10 Fiddlers Creek/Oyster Harbor Ph 2 La Palma - Act 2Q17 $498-$591 60x140 4 4 4 4 16 Fiddlers Creek/Oyster Harbor Ph 2 Torino - BO 3Q19 $589-$694 75x140 1 1 0 0 2 Fiddlers Creek/Oyster Harbor Ph 3 Torino - Act 3Q18 $694-$725 75x145 0 1 0 1 2 5 GL Homes 39 46 46 35 166 StoneCreek Ph 2 Classic Act 3Q17 $626-$774 67x135 8 7 16 13 44 StoneCreek Ph2 Vintage Act 3Q17 $492-$590 52x135 18 17 18 15 68 StoneCreek Plat 1 Caldera Cr- BO4Q19 $626-$774 67x135 2 2 6 0 10 StoneCreek Plat 1 Nova Lane - Act 4Q15 $492-$590 52x135 2 5 1 0 8 StoneCreek Plat 2 Regal Act 2Q17 $461-$528 45x135 9 15 5 7 36 6 DR Horton 35 36 41 14 126 Barrington Cove Ph 1 Act 1Q15 $415-$493 50x140 6 2 1 0 9 Mockingbird Crossing Ph 1 BO 2Q19 $545-$687 85x140 1 0 0 0 1 Mockingbird Crossing Ph 2 Act 1Q16 $609-$609 85x140 4 3 6 1 14 ® ® e e o e s es Reserve/Egret Ph II DR Horton Act 3Q16 $379-$544 53x130 13 6 8 1 28 Naples Reserve/Half Moon Half Moon Point Act 1Q19 $379-$544 53x130 0 11 16 3 30 Naples Reserve/Savannah Ph If DR Horton Act 3Q16 $417-$538 64130 3 5 4 1 13 Naples Reserve/Sutton Cay Ph 1 Act 4Q19 $445-$544 64130 0 0 0 4 4 c d C E Q d 2 0 iLO 0 co 0 numbers in this column are based on shared (multiple- Naples Residential Survey (IQ20) m et r V st u d y builder) sections; in these cases, the annual number is evenly distributed between builders in these sections Copyright Metrostudy Page 3 of 6 sales: 1-800-227-8839 Aha.dey...d Company Packet Pg. 385 9.C.3 Production Builder Ranking Collier County Sorted By Annual Closings Closings Rank Builder Name (Production) Section Status Price Lot Dim 2Q19 3Q19 4Q19 1Q20 Annual 7 Minto Builders 26 18 42 32 118 Isles of Collier Ph 10 Act 1Q18 $400-$464 40x140 0 5 14 9 28 Isles of Collier Ph 8 Act 1Q17 $400-$464 40x140 9 2 6 5 22 Isles of Collier Preserve/SF Ph 10 -Banyan Act 1Q18 $846-$1,258 75x140 2 1 2 0 5 Isles of Collier Preserve/SF Ph 10 -Mangrove Act 1Q18 $606-$826 60x140 0 2 1 2 5 Isles of Collier Preserve/SF Ph 10 -Palmetto Act 3Q17 $527-$623 50x140 1 0 2 4 7 Isles of Collier Preserve/SF Ph 13 -Banyan Act 1Q19 $846-$1,258 75x140 0 0 1 2 3 Isles of Collier Preserve/SF Ph 13 -Palmetto Act 1Q19 $527-$623 50x140 0 0 2 0 2 Isles of Collier Preserve/SF Ph 2 -Mangrove BO 2Q19 $604-$824 60x140 5 0 0 0 5 Isles of Collier Preserve/SF Ph 6 -Banyan BO 1Q20 $846-$1,258 75x140 1 0 3 4 8 Isles of Collier Preserve/SF Ph 6 -Mangrove Act 1Q16 $606-$826 60x140 5 5 8 5 23 Isles of Collier Preserve/SF Ph 6 -Palmetto BO 4Q19 $527-$623 50x140 0 2 3 0 5 Twin Eagles GCC/Grand Ph 2C - Dundee Act 2Q15 $539-$654 62x0 3 1 0 1 5 8 Divosta Homes 26 36 37 13 112 Winding Cypress/SF Ph 2 -Classic Act 2Q16 $385-$420 50x135 12 16 11 1 40 Winding Cypress/SF Ph 2 -Estate Act 2Q16 $499-$531 65x135 4 10 4 2 20 Winding Cypress/SF Ph 3 -Classic Act 4Q18 $385-$420 50x135 0 0 1 1 2 Winding Cypress/SF Ph 3 -Estates Act 4Q18 $499-$531 65x135 0 5 9 9 23 Winding Cypress/Villas (Att) Ph 2 BO 4Q19 $313-$323 36x135 10 5 12 0 27 9 Stock Development 16 14 23 22 75 Esplanade GCC/Salara Esplanade Blvd- Act 1 Q1 6 $1,30041,400 100x0 3 3 2 0 8 Fiddlers Creek/Marsh Cove Ph 2 Stock - Act 4Q16 $850-$1,005 80x180 0 0 1 0 1 Fiddlers Creek/Marsh Cove Ph 2 Stock - Act 4Q16 $850-$1,005 85x177 4 2 3 0 9 Fiddlers Creek/Marsh Cove Ph 2 Stock- Act 1Q17 $640-$740 60x155 0 0 1 0 1 Isles of Collier Preserve/SF Ph 11 - Act 1Q19 $930-$1,060 75x150 0 1 4 7 12 Isles of Collier Preserve/SF Ph 11 -Mahogany- Act 1Q19 $1,115-$1,195 90x140 0 0 0 3 3 Isles of Collier Preserve/SF Ph 12 -Sycamore Act 2Q19 $680-$800 60x140 0 0 1 2 3 Isles of Collier Preserve/SF Ph 7 -Mahogany- Act 2Q16 $1,115-$1,195 90x140 3 2 4 4 13 Naples Reserve/Canoe Canoe Landing Act 4Q18 $505-$540 70x130 0 3 6 4 13 Naples Reserve/Parrot Cay Stock Act 2Q16 $810-$850 85x130 1 1 0 1 3 Naples Reserve/Sparrow Cay Ph II Stock BO 1 Q20 $510-$510 78x130 5 2 0 1 8 Twin Eagles GCC/Grand PH 2B Twin Stock Act 4Q17 $1,120-$1,134 110x150 0 0 1 0 1 c d C E Q a. 2 0 iLO 0 to 0 numbers in this column are based on shared (multiple- Naples Residential Survey (1 Q20) m et rc, st u d y builder) sections; in these cases, the annual number is evenly distributed between builders in these sections Copyright Metrostudy Page 4 of 6 Sales: 1-800-227-8839 Aha 1,ywood Company Packet Pg. 386 9.C.3 Production Builder Ranking Collier County Sorted By Annual Closings Closings Rank Builder Name (Production) Section Status Price Lot Dim 2Q19 3Q19 4Q19 1 Q20 Annual 10 Del Webb 12 10 24 15 61 Ave Maria/Del Webb/Att Parcel 102 Ph 1 - BO 4Q19 $213-$237 42x124 0 0 3 0 3 Ave Maria/Del Webb/Att Parcel 102 Ph 2 Act 1 Q19 $215-$233 42x104 0 2 4 0 6 Ave Maria/Del Webb/Att Parcel 213 - Act 1 Q18 $215-$241 42x124 0 0 4 0 4 Ave Maria/Del Webb/SF Parc 102 - Act 3Q14 $237-$249 40x124 2 0 2 7 11 Ave Maria/Del Webb/SF Parc 106 & 112 - Act 2Q13 $255-$279 50x140 0 2 0 0 2 Ave Maria/Del Webb/SF Parc 107-108 - Act 1 Q19 $255-$279 50x140 0 0 1 0 1 Ave Maria/Del Webb/SF Parc 107-108 - Act 1 Q17 $255-$300 50x140 2 1 2 0 5 Ave Maria/Del Webb/SF Parc 107-108 - Act 1 Q17 $322-$354 65x140 2 2 1 0 5 Ave Maria/Del Webb/SF Parc 109 Act 1Q19 $322-$354 65x140 0 1 1 3 5 Ave Maria/Del Webb/SF Parc 109 Act 2Q19 $255-$300 50x140 0 0 0 1 1 Ave Maria/Del Webb/SF Parc 110,113- BO 4Q19 $255-$284 50x140 0 2 1 0 3 Ave Maria/Del Webb/SF Parc 203 - Act 2Q15 $255-$300 50x140 2 0 1 0 3 Ave Maria/Del Webb/SF Parc 204 - Act 2Q17 $322-$354 65x140 4 0 3 3 10 Ave Maria/Del Webb/SF Parc 213 -Triumph Act 1 Q18 $237-$249 40x142 0 0 1 1 2 11 Ashton Woods Homes 20 12 16 9 57 Fiddlers Creek/Marsh Cove Ph 1 AW -Palacio Act 4Q14 $855-$1,200 80x180 5 1 2 2 10 Fiddlers Creek/Marsh Cove Ph 1 AW Castillo Act 1Q15 $700-$825 60x185 1 1 4 0 6 Naples Reserve/Egret Ph II Ashton Act 1Q15 $370-$390 53x130 2 7 5 2 16 Naples Reserve/Mallard Point Ph II Ashton Act 1Q15 $355-$448 40x130 9 1 3 2 15 Naples Reserve/Savannah Ph II Ashton Act 1Q15 $450-$500 64130 1 1 1 3 6 Naples Reserve/Sparrow Cay Ph II Ashton Act 1Q15 $460-$614 78x130 2 1 1 0 4 12 Toll Brothers 12 7 15 18 52 Azure at Hacienda Lakes/Att Ph 1 -Villa Act 4Q18 $319-$333 30x100 0 0 5 9 14 Azure at Hacienda Lakes/SF Ph 1 -Estate Act 1Q17 $412-$487 55x135 2 5 4 6 17 Azure at Hacienda Lakes/SF Ph 1 -Signature Act 1Q17 $606-$706 80x142 4 0 3 0 7 Palazzo at Naples Ph 1 Act 1Q15 $453-$512 50x89 6 2 3 3 14 13 Mattamy Homes 11 6 8 13 38 Arboretum (TH) Ph 1 Villas 4 per Act 1Q19 $320-$339 Ox0 0 0 0 3 3 Compass Landing Ph 1 50 Signature Act 1Q16 $393-$448 50x135 3 4 1 4 12 Compass Landing Ph 1 60 Exec Act 3Q16 $440-$511 60x135 0 0 0 1 1 Compass Landing Ph 2- Signature Act 2Q18 $393-$448 50x135 6 1 7 1 15 Compass Landing Ph 2-60 Exec Act 3Q18 $440-$511 60x135 2 1 0 4 7 14 Express Homes by DR H 9 8 8 7 32 Hadley Place East Act 1Q18 $292-$309 50x105 7 5 2 2 16 Hadley Place West Act 1Q19 $292-$309 50x105 2 3 6 5 16 15 FL Star Construction 3 8 8 12 31 Arrowhead Reserve/Single Bush St -FL Star Act 1Q17 $182-$230 52x105 1 0 0 3 4 Arrowhead Reserve/Single Hamilton St Act 1Q16 $182-$230 52x105 2 8 8 9 27 16 Neal Communities 0 9 5 14 28 Marquesa Isles (ATT) Ph 1 Act 3Q18 $337-$362 35x122 0 9 5 14 28 c a� C E Q lli 2 0 LO 0 to 0 N numbers in this column are based on shared (multiple- Naples Residential Survey (1 Q20) m et r� st u d y builder) sections; in these cases, the annual number is evenly distributed between builders in these sections Copyright Metrostudy Page 5 of 6 Sales: 1-800-227-8839 Ahame ood Company Packet Pg. 387 9.C.3 Production Builder Ranking Collier County Sorted By Annual Closings Closings Rank Builder Name (Production) Section Status Price Lot Dim 2Q19 3Q19 4Q19 1Q20 Annual 17 WCl/Lennar 0 0 7 12 19 Sereno Grove Ph 1 Act 4Q18 $707-$827 80x140 0 0 7 12 19 18 Sobel Co 0 0 6 11 17 19 Mangrove Bay Developm 1 1 0 6 8 Mangrove Bay Ph 1 Act 2Q15 $2,505-$2,505 50x137 1 1 0 6 8 20 Gulfstream Homes 1 2 0 3 6 Chatham Woods Ph 1 Act 4Q17 $536-$630 80x140 1 2 0 1 4 Legacy Estates Ph 1 Act 4Q16 $640-$900 85x130 0 0 0 2 2 21 Seagate Development G 1 0 2 1 4 Windward Isles Ph 1 Act 3Q15 $1,245-$1,895 60x150 1 0 2 1 4 22 Blaczko, llc. 2 0 0 1 3 Willoughby Preserve Ph 1 Act 4Q17 $600-$600 80x140 2 0 0 1 3 23 Distinctive Communiti 2 0 1 0 3 Talis Park/II Ph 1 Act 1 Q1 3 $1,265-$1,515 43x170 2 0 1 0 3 24 Florida Lifestyle Hom 1 1 1 0 3 Naples Reserve/Parrot Cay Florida Lifestyle Act 2Q15 $1,100-$1,395 85x130 1 1 1 0 3 25 Dalia Building Compan 0 0 0 1 1 Estates at Horse Creek Dalia Building BO 1 Q20 $0-$0 80x145 0 0 0 1 1 26 Dalton Communities 1 0 0 0 1 Royal Palm Golf Estates Dalton BO 2Q19 $445-$445 90x150 1 0 0 0 1 27 Lundstrom Homes Inc 0 0 1 0 1 Naples Reserve/Parrot Cay Lundstrom Act 2Q16 $1,189-$1,189 85x130 0 0 1 0 1 Selection Totals 417 457 562 484 1,920 Selection Totals (including shared/split) 1,920 numbers in this column are based on shared (multiple- Naples Residential Survey (1 Q20) builder) sections; in these cases, the annual number is Copyright Metrostudy evenly distributed between builders in these sections Page 6 of 6 metrOstudy Sales:1-800-227-8839 AhanieywoodCompany Packet Pg. 388 9.C.3 u- (n I4 N C. W ai O M m M Wco 0? O V M (O LO (O O Cl) If) (f) a) Cl) N EA (fl (H 6% (H �2 (A r� (A (A (A E!-) fA m O 0) A CD O7 (O (O V (D V (O C M I- O O O O C)0) (O O o V > Q r r .-- r r N r N N N N u O N 4a a+ d 04 O O O O O O O O O O O N O O o V' V' O O O O L Oi W U � r- r r r � M � � ¢ 4. O (O M O N co O O N O O N O O N (O co N (0 LO N I� co O 7 co h co O Vt M ! 'a EA EA b9 EA 69 (fl b9 fA EA V3 64 m 0^0 O M M LL (� N CD O N M co N M CO N Ci co N M V' (O ^ M (2 r d' 'O' cq V 00 N 'cY N N p bq N N Efi EA EA EA H3 EA b9 Vi fA EA E9 O 00 ei O •� I^ V O V d' ( r (O C, O (O 0 O O m > LL ] Q U) �O r (O r (O r (O r (O .-- O N I� r O N O N (O N m N (p � .. LO O d O O O O O O O O O O OCD W I� O O d' N d' rl- O (O O of O (O O O N V 00 O (3 C) O U) d'0 co (O LO LO (O (() (O 0. M U9. N U! l N EH N 6e N HT 69 N Efl Cl) e% m fA Cl) EA m EA (n -W O O N N 00 O0 M I� r 7 r V r LL (A Oi O (n .N- LO (n V co�2 M V N r r 3 N rn o m m m � m W m CL Q U r r r r (n0 .-- O N r N N (OO N N °' Y d 0 0 0 0 O 0 O o o O o V M r (O (O (O m N N N U m tI N R( O• 00 M (O N (O N (O N (O N It co (O N V' M co m 7 co O0 m V �V (fl V3 V3 V) Vi V3 Efi fA EA EA EH ...\ EU.N ,a♦ N Cl! N M r r (O N �() ti (1f 'v♦ U E y O N N N N (�O m dam' N N N N `• ]� V! EH ER EA (A 69 M EA EA EA 69 ; � r V/ � o Oo r O Ci r ( (flOa cn w O C -Q Q y r r r r r N r N N N N c TO CC= CD O co C N O d O O O (O O (O O 0) O V O d' O 0)O O O O O O ,a (� L O U N N N O N I� r- N tl oc y d a co Cl) O N O N O N (co^ N (co N U0 N M Cl)Q M M M J O O E9 V3 ER 6 9 EA EA 69 EA E A EA fA U a L C/) .2 (O 0 U) (O uo n (O (n (O (o (O CDC1 V +� N C2 0 O O O M M M M M V Z L (O N N N O LO N N O N O R! O M LO (O (O (O d LO (O (O I� J � C O O O M m O O N N O co LO LO O co �t d' O O Q U N N cc G O O1 N m N O O N m O O O O O O O O O O O O (a y O L O O O O s O O O O O O O Q O r O j O CJ O N j N O O O U Z (n Z (n Z 'ZS L O N — m — N — O O Q al QU O O O7 O U O U O O M M N O U U N d' co M (O N W (O (O N Cl)J OO 3 r (% _ O O _ O N _ O O O N _ O _ O O O O O O C) 'a L (n U U U U U (a O E M n m N r Cl) N V O N 0 (O r w J J J O Cp yN„ O] co N C V C O C m O (O O O O E M 1� (O O Cl)O LO O M N du V i i O O E N ` O r _ a E O LL G O Q U C O U C O `m U E O 2 m O (� 0 m E W v C Cn (n (n m (n J G w w W ate] 0 N O H m 2 N L J 3 LL J LL J LL y (D J ` 7 LL 3 LL O 0.. ` O Q. ` > Q. LL N I-- N Z ° Q .m-• U E O a C m m Z 0 c 2 ~ d' m O) a N m J c N m c N Q N p > O w O O O O C ci a g o E> m ° f0 ° U o w w Q 'j N 0 r W r L .0 3 s r 7 � m •y r L 10 r L r L r L N .0 C14 L C .0 LL LL O Q m 2 ) LL LL LL a_ O_ O_ ; U7 Q Q Q Q Q co c0 r Packet Pg. 389 �" O Lq O o N N OY N 'ch � d V E9 O (2 69 o 12 E9 o v f9 N � f9 d' M E9 M V f9 M M V� N 69 co C) 69 O O U3 R y LL > Q O (N (O r O (n r CO r r OJ r r M N m r O N LQ N O (A c N r (n N M N m r I- Lo (D N O (n r N O I� O O W O (A O I� N U W ( o N m 7 m o 4. M (N N E9 d' N EA f- O N E9 n O N 69 o r N 69 O co M w � m N w O M M w O r- N (9 W M cM Ui 7 N 64 O O) W N N O V N V L- N 64 I� 7 E9 O (D E9 o In 69 o IU 69 N to 69 V M 69 M 'cY 69 M M 69 N N 69 M M 69 o (D ua v O) 1n O co O co Ih M I� O y > Q N T N N r r a0 -7 W N CO N LQ N O O N In Lq N N 00 r (O Lq N LQ r rn o) N U rn o Ln o V ti �t ti V v) O r N m O d' rn (A Ln o d M N N EA N 69 O N E9 (O N 69 co r N 64 (D M M 69 1- O) N (9 O co M E9 (D Il- N E9 m M M (9 V N 69 U.r O O Iq CA N O N N N V 69 O E9 m E9 N w m w N 69 (00 69 N w h 64 N 69 O 64 OI R `u LL > (() N (f) O Cb (D r (O r (D r V N O f` co r V O ro Q O r r r r r N r N r N r d M O (n CO M Cl) O O O M O (O V O) O (O M M N CD o N M o N CO o m V V V' h I� O O Co N (O o O V Co M oo /!l `Y . a N N (o N I-- N w r N r N M Co (A (D N CO1l- M N (9 CoM M (9 N (9 EM t9 (9 (9 (A (9 (A ON LL (n 6F� (oD E9 7 m E9 t0 E9 (t) 69 (n 69 I- N E9 O m 69 N 64 V' m 69 (O E9 r N E9 V' m 64 V/ O) N m Co O Cl) r m o m ^ C O-Q LL a N (O r V r 0: r N r M r V (D N CO r- r CD N V r Cn r �' CO N V r L /1 C1 N 0 0 O 0 O) 0 m o m O W o o d) O o m O O O m � U rn rn <t �t V v � rn a rn v v rn _ /7 a LO (O N (o M N N N N M (D N co Co M N N Co N O O E9 69 EA 64 64 E9 69 69 69 64 U3 E9 N N O O O o o 0 0 o N fn X N X N xX O O x O X O X ( X (O X (O X O X o X u)O X � V I-V (O (l7 (O CDD (D (D Nt 47 CO � J C N C O (D (fl V V' N N r (O (O (n to O O (O (O O O Co Co O O N N Q U r r O N N m R a)O O O R o O O O O O O on O O O > N O O O O O O O O O O O O Q _O It o tf (D O O O O Co O O O U Z Z O N N Co d a) : r Co o N N o Ih Q > ° U m o o 0 U 0 .r- 0 0 o o o o 0 o o o a y _ o - 0 u) _ R R U U O E F � N (D (O O) O M N M N N M M O R aN+ O � Co (DN Cl) N (D O C (OD V N Cl)M COto F � N .O in -a C �o aN N > N > U -a.o .O n N N T N N N N U N >N N Q) >N 4>) >Q) U) Co N LL i5 N N N > o N m 0) LA N P) N N p N N N N Ea 3 m m L E 4) N y ,o N a a a a o E E R Z W N M N 05 CO O CO O Co O Co O O IL L U F' ❑ O ❑ N (D r r ti r O) U N CM V' Cop G (p r N jp O O O O O O O O O (p N R N @ (0 R R (0 R (0 (0 (6 R R a a n w n a a a a a a a a a u) > a a � N N � r r Q LO O w O N M CD E 3 u O 0 Q Y u m m U a. U U r O O O O O N O N J u N E L O J E L m CD O m d O U CD t u Q Packet Pg. 390 1 9.C.3 LL N N N N N U{ N (O O M M N O EA 64 Efl 69 Efl EA 69 64 (fl 6s 64 I _ > LL M N Co N Cl) N CO N M N m r O LQ O L E V V P- m 'o Q� N M Cl) M Cl) M N r N d O O O O O O I- O (O (O (O r m m m m m m m m V' V Gi Gl U 1� r r 't ( V r Co N Cl! Q LL 7 (O Co } (O Co 7 (O V' (O Co V' (O M Co O M N m N o V' M Co N CD(o N M N Co (� (� (� 1.0 64 64 69 D LL (O l0 (� (O (O (O �2 (O V r M (O m N k] m (O m Q N �2 cM- a2 N V V m m N CO U7 fA 69 EA 69 EA 6q 6e 69 64 64 EA pO rl Of .. W '^ V LL Co V Co 7 Co d' Co 7 M V OO Co N N m N O m O m as .. > > 6 N Cl! N N N V I� m I; � (O N Q Co Co M Co Co N r N r r r to rn O (O (O v d O m (n O m LQ O m LQ C. m (n O m L co Co O m (O v (n O v m m m m m O N u N N N N N O Co Co m m M 69 (O 69 M 69 M 69 Co EH Co fA N N 69 Co EA N 69 Co 64 M 64 (n y.( (O (O (O (O (O r (O N OJ OR E U.(O `1 M T (vj �2 (2 N d' O V m (D 3 69 ffl 69 EA 69 64 69 69 69 EA u m O M 0 w LL M "I'r Co Co V Co 7 Co V t0 Co N N m N O m O m Q N Cl! N Cl! N '1 I� m I- Iq Iq Q U M Co M Co (`7 N r N r r r O1 Y u o 0 0 0 0 (O Co (o o (O (O u M N U m (O m m m m O m O (O CO O o] o N N r (� m /!! 1 N Co M N Co M N (O M N (O CO N (O M O M 'cY N M M m M N N r Co N r Co \V EA EA V3 V3 V3 Efl 69 e% ER 64 fo ^ a E U U to .N- N V N m m Y `jiy O N EfT Efl (fl EA 64 64 64 69 w H3 ER 64 ,�LO Cn N 1>1 LL M M M M 'ITV Co m Co N N (O N m N O m C.Q m ' i t O O N Co N Co N Co N Co N M V N r- r O N r M r r (n r (O r w N O O O Q O �v C/) ° c=m O L �,, FL 'Q a N o m 0 m 0 m 0 m 0 O o m M (O o m o m O m (O It (O m� a ._ f0CD N W ftft 41 u m m m m m m N d' m m Cl! N y L d N a o (o 0 (o 0 (o 0 (o 0 (o of m a) M v Co of (O v CO LO o LO o m a J 4. Co Co Co Co Co N N M V' N Co M O ww O O i Co ua 64 64 64 w 64 64 64 64 Uf l 64 64 y () = v O l0 l0 m m m O O O O O V ++ N h M M M M M M It V V O O Z •�,i L X (O X (O X (O X (O X (O X (O X (O X O X O X O X O X O rt+ MnO J Co Co (O Co Co(O V m m Cl) CO C C V C O O O O O Cl) CO m M (2 (2 (O CD CO (O O O (O (O O i112 N Cu O O O 3 O O IO m O 5 m OO OO O (a > L L a)O O Q O O CD O N U ° o O o o Co � a� m m ) d � O O O (O h r p O O N p M O CM O J Q > U O O O m U M O 9 a�.r S O O O IDi' _ O S O 1 m _ ('O N 7 (n V% c 73 U O U O U O U O U R o f N o m m v ~ ) CDm 7 N (O m M O m V m N 7 m Q 'C Co I-- CO N O N (O N (O V' L F M d 3 0 m (n (D (n w O d � N O O a y ° O N E w Ul E Ol E N E N E Na) E a) E y o N a) E y N E w N E L o L o U ° o o ° o ° o O ° m ° - ° Q _ I-2 = 2 2 2 2 2 = y Co m a+ N U U U U U U U y U y U N Of U Y O O m '6 U U U U U U U rn U rn U 0 U I W a a N ;O_ J E G1 E v Q iR d K a Z 4' w a0 N Z an (o d d m c -2o` > m 3 m w ° m o ° u m Oc lL N in N W C7 U U > m m m ram+ D W W W Q Q Co A W m A U N � > (p �1 N Co 2 Z) N L M L L (O L (O L (O L ° r L r L (C r L N L d y N LL a M O_ LL d O_ W Gl LL N O_ 7 LL O_ m Q> a a a Q" CL Co Packet Pg. 3 1771 9.C.3 V) (o (n r-� Lf? (fl I: LL 6g N EA Vi Hi 69 69 E:3 63 N 69 N O7 (n u) V' Cn L O m N FL > N (I V O N M M m N M m m O Lo m N Q y N M N CO N N N O N Cn (N (o m LO N O) h U M r M I- M CO N a` m Lo V m V LL � ro � r m 64 N N 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 m A m M m m Ih o V m > LL Cl � M CMo CM7 � L[O] N N Qa) N N N M N N N N m LO m OLO o) m N � m O) to U m H; m C7 Cl I� m Il d V V CCoo V V' N M Lo EA to CR 69 69 69 69 Vi 69 N m )O <t m m LL lA (n Q) O fA oo oo N CO � 69 w 64 69 69 69 69 69 61� w rn m Co m v m rl- o v m O LL C m m CMO Cl) r- COo N N Q y N N N M N N N N CY U obi O Ol) V (3 m N M rn m m rn G m C O a` N � � Co ' Co lo Em M m m m M O m (O LL m E N (D Co (o r (D Lo r i� N 'fir O C N m 69 69 69 La a Cl) C C`m N M (M Co m Co M CO m O to CEO N � N 0 IL > N N N .Q Q y N CO N N N Nlj m m m N a) o) o) /� d m m m M m m m 7 O hL V M Il- Co 1l- M ti CO N 6. V V V M Co CoN m (o M Lo h 1� )O N )f) I.- to to (D N X X X X X X X X LO (00 Lo ) 000 Lo (Oo M )No N V O J C O O O 0 O O O O m m co M m m O o O O O O O Co O y O O y O O O) > N O O O O O O L O L O L O Q O C O O O O r, m 1� O L) N O O O U Z Z :Ep O N N N Q. ` _ O co M r O N Q Q U C0 r U oq U U LO - _ o 7 (n o o O o to U U U U O E V N N m N 7 V m r F U) K m y N N (o Co o o oo m V •C V (o Cl) N 't M m N F 7 E O m N (n (n m E E 2 N C N t U) L N L N L N L O o E LL O O O O O O C C F- _j J (.7 co j (D N O m N m N o 0 m u) N y N C N N DI ` ` U •o Z N W 2 m m N O w C O Y �' d N n. X LL O O = oe 13. W In w 2 d m > U (G N N U C U N A d LL LL LL LL a_LL C H C LL N LL (A Q m m U O m M N c- d C Q 'C V LO 0 w N d E 3 V O 0 Q Y u Mm W U d U U LO CD r 0 CD CD N O N J d v N C� G R L O J L f0 CD O m d O U CD E t u Q Packet Pg. 392 1 m Cq m LLCo d ua r e CD A > Q O V Cl) c°)o O d' MCO ((o M Co a y O N N N N N a v O 0) 1- 10 O CY) r LO O C. 6q U�l U'� LL O LO c0 N r � r � � 64 64 � � � 64 w W LL > Q o Cl) ' rn o M V a) v O Q U) N cM N Co a O O O O O U) U LQ N to d' o a O) � a 0)N a) 00 ua F» en in U� fn r-: LL w rn > �= O V m O Co VM' O r CO CO Q U) O N M N M a O O O O O M U O t` lf) m 0) 0) rn O t` Ltl O) � (3) rn O O O CA a � � � 69 CA U> E In U.EU. to Co 69 00 EA m 6e 00 EA N '^ Cn ;j m O CoT M ID M O LL > y QCn V (V M V N M \V C/) — a O O O O //�� a G.1 ti7 O) N '2 m 0) Vm M In M rn M m M o )O N N N X X X X ClX Co M /!� I G LO to LO CO C O N N� r �O u7 1� t` O O Q U O y N = O O O O O O C. O O O O O Q O O C O C O U Z Z U p d O! ) _ rn N o N Co o (q 0 U 0 Cj Ci y 0 0 0 U) C U UCc U m o m It ti N v f ~ OD O) )O r E Co aNi aNi a`�i a`�i c 0 0 0 0 y w U a ` N E E E E U Y Co V w Co y6 C _ 11 O 2 N 2 o Co >O E m ^� N c N Z '6 C c a U X m X y = U m m LU W O a C O y m cn (0 O W a U 'j U m m a N N > d' a E a a a nn- u aL. a s U) U W W a A m N N LO I- 9.C.3 E d E C Q d :.7 LO 0 w N to C N E 3 V O 0 Q Y u Mm W U d U U LO r O 0 CD CD N CD J d V N E L O J E L m O 7 O m d O V CD E t u Q Packet Pg. 393 1 9.C.3 LL M m M M r Cl? a) n f� m r mto v v y V3 Efl V3 e4 e3 Vj V3 N V) N CO 0) y LO N LO N Co V LO N O) L LO N Cl) r LO CO LO N o > Q. 8 Q y N N N N N N N N N N a a L O O M O r O Co O O r O O •cF o (a O M (D O i U LO LO O LO O LO N !� Q a (O M (o M M 'tt Co M O d' (O M O V V d' � _� V3 V3 Vi (H 63 Vl V9 Vi ViLM O) m W LL O O V O M O LO Q) a) m C) M N N Q (n r r r r O O _ V) _ to _ V! _ V) V3 V> V) V3 V3 0.0 ei C C C p A LO (D LO 0) LO C) LO LO y '^ V _ j a N m N V N N Co N m N Q y N N N N L( N N N N N u% rn O d (O (D O (D 0 (D m O O O v 41 o a) 0 O) m m N o a) o O) N U O O O o r� O N N �� 0. M CO V M V' M L(') d' 't (n V3 V3 V3 V3 ER V3 V3 V3 V) yr r r- v � Cl? r rn rn rn Cl) Lf) N N 3 to y V3 Vi V3 V3 V3 Vi V) V3 6p :.: a O iT 0 LL LO N LO N O V LO N Q1 L LO N Co r LO N LO Co > Q N N N N N N N N N N U' D (D o w o m Co O o u M N m Cl CoO Co O Co C) O a) Co M N Co CD O) O a) m C1 O n N N /!! a m m d' Co 7 Co LO V t» tH cfl (fl t» 6e tH to V> _ a E� N O) : N 'd: N M Cl!N LO C a) a) Q) U. (1J• (n LO (o Co L() Co LO 00 LO r (fl Lb OJ o0 CJ C2 '�1!►� T � � CN ], LO O y Vi V9 V> ej Vi Co 63 V! 69 69 & j CO V� V ; ` LO a) (D LO (O LO a) Co (D LO ' O O N {i LO N (0 N 14L V' LO N 1� 7 CI N LO L LO M N O (O Co r m (`0 Cl! M N M Cl! 0) �_ +c+ W O //O++ .aQ Q Cr N N N N N N N N N N N N N m r� tp CD � v U) — C= a) O O 0 O o C) o 0 0 0 o m o o O d >T (� a N FL o LD 0 a) 0 O) 0 LO 0 O) o LO O (3 (D Ln o 't Cl) N 0 a) 0 a) o O '� H L a O O V O N C. C)O O rl O O N N N N d N _ d O) m 00 m N 7 O) CO N d' m Co N V 0) Cl) N m 613 V3 6s V> V) of 6-3 V3 V) V3 V3 V3 V3 to () O i 1 O O O O O O O O O O O 00 O () +/ u N M v M Cl) M M M M LO LO LO M LO L to X N X N X N X N X N X N X N X N X N X N X N X N X N rt+ (n O LO LO CoLO Co LO Co LO (O (D LO LO LO C C O M m O O Cl) m O o N N C. O 0 0 O O N O C.N N (0O Q U N cc G O pi CD CD O CD O C) O N O O CD N Cu C) C) C)> y O O O O O O O O O O L O O O Q O C O O O O O (0 O N O N L) 0) O O (/) w a) > p 0000 O O CDr LO (fl ter- O O a0 O O LO N a0 Ln Co LO O LO N N J Q a Q w = O O O O 0 U U L 7 O O O L N O U U U � OE N N O O) O M O M m 00 LO > O O M M m Cy 'C (ND V' Ce) (D d' d' l00 LO F � L C O C O G O C O C O C O C O G O C O C O G O C O C O Oi LL. y y (A T N Mn (n y (/1 w N T w (n �. a �. C t. -- O O O (0 O O O O O O O O 8 O O O V Y _ J 2 � w � 2 O 2 J O O U O O N o O O O LO E o 0 0 01 > T O (0 Z F- O Z �. (0 H >. m >. > (D Z F- >. (6 H a (0 F- T 03 F >. Cu F- T 03 >. Co H _ — >. O N H >. -p N > H T C N (� F- c (L > Co m y U > U w F $ Z CU ots Z 2 o m a m E E U o m U � a m > a� > _ D m = m U m U o Co c O C 03 Co m Co Co (O a > O a > O 0) a (6 c O 0) c — Q y C O N O 00 a 'Q a Q N J Z (0 J Z A 0.' � N � W � Q > U C r r r N )_ V' LO C r Cl) LO a W N N r L L L L L t L (0 L L w L L L a s a a a a a a a a a a o a a a N w w w a LO Packet Pg. 3 47 9.C.3 r m 00 m m (m N O N o N LL (�i O N N N r LO (O 00 N 00 N om f V tO N O 0 N N m O Oi N eA N e9 N E9 N ffl N 64 N 64 N EA N ffl N EA N EA N ffl N fA N GI � m (71 y LO m r M (O r (O ti LO N N N r m N N r m N (O aN V > a N N r- O r- L Lq N cp Q U) Cl) r Cl) N m Cl) N N N N N M 3 a r O M O O O O O O O O o r 0� N U N tO m V <t N m m m m m m m m o V 0 m 0 d' m m (O n. N w r v m o 7 N co N 00 U) c400 M v (O (MO co N N F» e» e» e» e» 6s e» e» e»U. fO N l0 M co (O m N r IO (O lO N (n O m r � M O O d eq N N eA N eA N eA N EA N 69 N eH N EA N ea N H% N ca p 00 C C W e=1 •• lw 0 y y N ilJ m r N co m (O 7 d' N N co V co V N m E� .. > cy Q N co N r � co m m co N (O N � N O m LO m w r O N O O O M O O N O N M Oml Omi M M O? N U N r O V LO co NO co (O N LO LO a M V' O co W ( 10 LO N es es in C N r Lq m v v (o N N N N (p LL O N co LO I-- r M N O N O 3 N fA N eH N efl N EA N fA N EA N 60 N fA N Efl N EA N 69 N Efl u N 6 O 0 w y LL N LO m r N co Cl) (O m r m r (O N N N m V N N m -IT N Q 07 Q U) N m cc r l0 Cl) m N .-- M �-- M N N r N lO N N c0 N O Cl) °' Y C7 n O N O O O Cl) O O O O N u M GI O N (O 7 m M m m m m m m N m O ' O O ' O (O m m a N (O (O (O O O O V (O h m c0 N m to N Cl) (O (O cM m 7 N (O M m V' N LO (O (O (D E9 d' eA 6s H3 eH fA Efl EA 03 EA efi 1 a v ti (n m (n L r N N N N N (° (� U LL (A O O N O N N N N N V co N m r N m r N (O N N N N m N I- O N N N r O N m N n �- �a LO eA eA efl eA (A eH e9 e9 e% EFT effl 6% Gl .7 r C a N '' m (O m N N m m (O N U) N c0 Q O LL. •-- M co O V T N } N V% a,.. W O O Q� M r co N m M m N m N N N c � 0) h O (� U� - G t m O Cf N m N O 'd' N m 1l- m Cl) � Cl) � Cl) N Cl) m r (O (O N m Cl)N (O n c0 ,a (� NO W 'Q N d' Cl (O Cl N rO N N a m N a o o (o (o r (n r- (o m co U) o m m tl- (o LO O I-- (m o m y a J (D ea d' e» O � (» N e» N (» (O (» U) e» (0 (» LO (» rO e» r0 (» N e» U a L V co a) O O O LO O n (O O O O O O (O m N rIL 0 (O N N N l0 V V d' 'V' V' d' Z L X (O X O X O X O X O X (O X O X O X (O x O X O X O X r0 N J N (O N co (O r0 h c0 cO m I— v/ O co 00 V V O O N co r m m r O O O O N N O CD O O N N Qr U N N r r r C OI @ O CD O O O O O O O O O O CD � N @ L O w O w O O O O O r O O O O O O CV o o o 0 0 CDN U Z n (n (n p O N N N N L Q N p l0 p N Cl) Cl) N N p O O N N O (O J Q Q U l0 U N U O m m V 'c: U O rO m V O r e 7 O O N 1 O O O O S O O O O O O 'a L U) c U U U U f0 _ @@ O E r0 M M (O N V c0 ~ W V N m M (O N _ O m r Cl) M E E N M V mco N O C r O m O G r N G @ Cl)7 C @ (� a a a 0 0 0 0 0 0 AR c ° o N 0 0 0 0 0 ° o '� U '° ° > > > a `o cG `o `p o `o o cC V y N C O U 0 0 .0 C O C O Q 41 O O U U U U @ O O J O O N O J O +� O c m F m E V a U r N F ¢ N N 9¢ o (n @ (q C m (q = y Y @ M H y @ n H C @ m H S' N m H E Y m F N m m F ` E m c E Q N N m U O N J V N V Z i.i (aG) N d CFo ) y y Y N — O cc — co ° 00 C N •a U U > O O O U O O @ O co p �+ •> U O r0 r r r N N N N r r N N N M rn a s v a m L a m a r a L a a r a r a L a L L a t a a (O W LL LL LL O• m N m N N N n Pg. 395 Packet 9.C.3 m r m m- (q (L m O O N m m m N N m m C11 O m y� N W V3 V) N V3 Vj Vj En N Vj N 63 V) V3 N 613 V) m � E N O N Co O M M N f- m ID m CD Co M Cl) M N I- Co O CO M m CD G V > LLQ, r m N r- r m m N r- m rl c 0 Q y N N r M N N r r Cl) N �'- N 3 � a+ O 7 O O M N O m O O O m m N M N O m O m M N O m C Oi Ul f� m (") (3 (3 m M M 0 O M O O? Q d Co 7 I� N (O (n IhCo ILO In 7 V m V3 EF3 V) Vi V3 V! to Lm a (A r m M )n O m V' N V' O m CM 0 m M LO m m V N m V N V O m M LO m m 7 N M In m d to N N V3 V) N 63 VJ V) el"Vi N N V) Vj Uj N Vi 64 pip �-1 Q '^ V y LL m N M d' Co Co Co O M V Co V M Co Co Co m 0) Co V' Co m m W > I Q r N m r m N m N m N cc r oz r m N m N ro r m N In u% m O O M O O O (Y) M 0 O Cl) O O N V I� m r N M V' N m i� m ti N M N M V N 0) rl N Cl m f� N U M O )O M M O O m M O M a Co V) V Imn LO )n i d m )O V )O (p Vj 63 Vi 63 Vi 613 (A 63 Vj Vj Vj d m m )O 7 r (O (O V V r tO 'V' r In E LL O o V N m 't V' N N 0) V' N m 't N m m m N N N N m 63 63 V> I.G (a V) V3 6e 6% V3 V) 64 V3 Vi u O 0 m m r M N r C7 (M N Co N N N N m M m m Co Co m Co m Q In o] Cl N In � N � (\ N m m cl N IO Q N r r N r Co N N r r Co N r M N Cl O O Co O O O M Co O O Co O O V M V N m V N N m N m V m N U N (M Co V N N M (O M m V Cl! M (O V N A! a M M O Ln O d' m (n O Un O u') O 't O V m (n O (n CDm LO O (n 63 Vi Eq V3 Vi U� V) w 6.3 V) 613 V3 V3 (A C a CN (o m LL (n O m o m Co m N N N 1- m Co m Co m N N N N N N m Co m N N m M m !� �- ��Y O N V3 V3 Vj V3 613 V3 03 Vi V3 64 V3 V> V�l w O 2 y� CD •; N m m Co m Co m 0) m Co m M m Co m M CO Co m M m Co m m m Co m � V- CD CD Q r r N r N N N .-- r N N r N (N a) O Q) m W C L a) O O L ), 'Q a N LO LO 0 0) CO N m m N N 0 m Co N (rn o m a p) � N CDLV N I% Cl a� r r- [- M m P M r r- y d �' N a O O N M m N CO (» 00 O m (» (0 O V (» (O LO V3 Co O In U» ro O LO (fl m O 'V (» m O V' by r- )O (O V> m O LO (» (o 0 7 v, t- m (O (» .0N O In v, a O V J a y v V 4 ++ 0 0 )O In IO O In (O m In In n )O n C1 N (x CO Cl) Cl) M Co CO M M M M M M Z •L N 'V N V X (O X 0 X LO X (O X (n X CD X X Ln X )A X O X LO X (O y( o J m m r- (0 (0 (O )O m M I- (O � C N C O Co O CD O O CD O r O O m m CD CD CD 'd' "IM Co (n )n I� r N O N CD o o m o 0 0 0 0 0 Cl 0 0 0 Cl Cl 0 o m o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Q O G N N r O Co O C) O N O O C. O O N U ) 0 'a p O 0) N N L G Q QC) p I� m h p O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O CO M IO N PM Cl J w _ Co C) _ O O O O O O O O O O N 'a 7 N O O L (A U 0Ca f0 m O E LO ~0 m M� m m N M 7 'ITQi H L V <Q r N N N G) _ m Cl) )n Co Cl) N Co CO m _ O m N L h- 7 D) W R n m W 0 N E N E w 0 0 w 2 = o 3 3 a� o Ci U Ci U a) m a 7 a E 7 a 7 a O 7 a a 7 a 0 5 a � 3 a a a a a m E V O w 2 a o o 0 V N ci Z a nL. a 0 0 a o m m °c E N m r C C Co W W W 0-1 Y N /6 N N (0 R r+ Q (n 0 3 > j w w a` m m m w > r N = ,p CD G L a L a T y a LL LL L a L a L a L a L a L a L a L a L 0- O LO m Packet Pg. 3 6 9.C.3 (0 I� m r M O O 't LL U7 N m o m N m 00 N N N LO (O m (y N N N N N N e4 69 69 f9 b9 f9 69 H3 K) E9 G) 0) N Cl) N m CO N 0) h m > LL Cl)N r N (m0 C r r V QU) r M N r M r r r r M O N d M O O M O O «) O O O r U M Gi Gi M (Y r 0)N Ui LO O I� I- O (O M M M d It m m LO 7 m (O O M M (1) Cl) 'cF M O 6s EA (9 64 E9 H3 64 E9 E9 V3 (0 '7 M (O N N M O O <{ U.t O LO 7 O O D) N N LO N � m m N (O (O O) d 69 6A E9 E9 (9 69 w w w E9 N LL CO M m Q) Co V M Cl) m O) 0) m (3) m V m N N (3) M > m rn m m rn (o (o rn v_ Q N r N N r N r r r r r Co T d M O O Cl) O O O I- O O O U N M V N O � N M V N 0) � 0) V m (M O (O O (O (O m O U) M O (n Co Cl) M M d. d' (O LO LO V' (O m O Cl) O Cl) M Cl) M It M d' O f9 w f9 EA (9 E) 69 (9 (9 U) (a cr r (O V r r r O O V LL04 (!`7 N m N C�0 (�0 LO V) m v m A N Co N CO N O) (3) (3) L W N (00 � N o o r r Q� r CO N r Co N N r r Co O) d Co O 0 (m o 0 0 0 0 0 M N m 0) V' N O) O) O) O O U)M N(M U (O Cl! (O V r V 0) V (O M Cl) m (2 R! d O m (O O (O O �t m m M Co Co Co Cl) d' Cl) d' O V (A (A (A E4 60- Ui l (A (f, V, 64 d' m V V m r r m m m Co N N ar0 W m V N � N N N N N `�^ O (n Vj E9 69 E9 f9 E9 E9 E9 E9 E9 of V+ .� rn Co m Co M m W O O) O Co m O d) d' m Co m O d) O) O O O N r N r Co � O a {y Q M VZ y r N N r N N N r r U) °) ]� d CO (O O M (O O O O O O W N G) N Cl r r O I� N (I r 0) O (3) a) (O a 2 (0 00 (o v 0) m r O O Cl) Cl) N N / o C .O � �� Co 60 69 e r 10 10 LO LO (O LO (O m O O O Gl M M M M M O O m yX X X X X X X V X X X O LOO U) LO (On LO 00 ( (00 N V V LO CY C O C r O) O Cl) M m Co N N O O Q U r r r N N N N O O) E O O O O o O O O O O O >( Q O O o O O o O O G O O t O o t O N O N L O o U U 0 (0 (0 y O N ) N N y O)a O CO O Cl) (O NCO I� CDCDO Q Q O M LO m N U M () U m O U O O C. O O O - O CO 1 S N S CDz 7 N O O O O (q c U U U U OEm d) N �� CO (0 (0 Cl) M ~ 4) 0 0 l0 aN• O LO (O (O r N (D r 'E T V T CoQ r Co 0 Co aN m 0 0 E E 3 U 2 2 a) p 'C77 '07 N 7 Co Co O m N N O O N m m O O 2 O a_ d d 0- 0-w w 10— N C C 41 C H E E - p n a m Z a v c 0 c m 2 m m 2 m a o o N 3 12 w a c� > N N M Co M -0m O —0 a IL a a. a M a w E a v a a m a 7 cn C x 10 x N N O m n N M Co M Co Q ,C V LO 0 w CD M E 3 V O 0 Q Y V m m U d U U CD 0 O O O N CD J d V Mn C� G R N E L O J E L m CD O m d O U O E t V m r Q Packet Pg. 397 1 9.C.3 L (o N � m r- LL m o M o � o 6H N m N ffl N 69 Cl) 6e M efi (M (A m cH N (fi N U9 N co N w N Vi � t y rn M v m r N LO N r N U N UO N m Cl) (O O v M r M o V v > Q O) O r C r C V' M O) r Q N M N Cl) Cl) m m ce) co N N O (O LL) o L2 O m O r (O O N m ((O M CO i' (o V' M CIO C M V Q U n. M O N (moo O O N O O N co Cl) M O m LO c0 (0 O) co _ (A ff) E9 En (A Ef) Y) 69 60 U9, w 01 W w E LL V (O (0 r (0 r N 'V. M (O � ry aQ 0) M � O (n cq LOV co O p fp N N fA N (f) co 69 N (a m P9 N ea N 6f) N cA N EA N EA N V! p 00 ti c O) U1 y LL O) M M N r N (O N r N -0 N LO N m co (O o m N r co W .. > 6 Q 7 co C (o C Cl) r M O co r co O (0 'ct M M N O co r y( to rn o r L r r r O a) (0 (o m M r (L Cl O) (O (O co Cl! M O) V N U d M O N m co M (n co O) It O) 00 O 't N r M O O r l0 N O) co O) d' M ffl EA _' V3 69, _ Efl Vf U) Efl GS EA CD V (O 00 O (O O O W V Q') (o (D (0 E LL U1 Om) m (n 0) m CD M 0) O 3 N N N m N m N N N N N N N N a 69 6e 613 cfl Efl 69 ua EA EA efi 69 (A (fi O O) Q W N LL O (M 00 N m O r N m (O r N co (O m N O) M (O o m N m (n r M Q > Q 7 C M o r C r C V' M o r r Q CO Cl) N m M M Cl) M co N Cl) m �'- °' Y a m O 10 r Cl) C) V O (0 CDO d' C) CD (0 r O LO Cl) m r o O O M u (0 a) O M N (O (1 (O c3 O) (O N m Q V Cl a M O m (0 (O O) r (n (O 0) O) 7 o LO O) 0) d' o V N r m O O) r (f) co (0 (0 V o r Q) m M V (» (» 6r3 (A 69 N ci N O r (n V' (O 'd: N r N O) V U. N 7 m N (o co N M (O N O) O co O (o N m o m O) co N O <t N 'cY m N co m N 7 m N w m N M co N O o N !� �- �a ER cf! 64 6f! b9 ua Vi EA 6 ff3 ffl (H 1. V) c w 0) v (O r v r v Ln 0) LO m v r `1 CD ►� O a LL M V m O C. M CD O Ln N O O (0 N N O co 't O m Cl) Nt m O) N co r .(.., O CD yCl) N N Cl) V M V Cl) M N M N 't m c 0 O RiV C/) L d /\ N Qi 'Q o (O (O if) o O rn v o m m o O) Cl) N 0 (O (o 0 O 0 (O (O m (D O) (n d' a) p) p7 N .4 lC CDlip i m a u (0 M v_ a v_ co M 0:)�- 't(D m •- m (o d co G y a N �'' `•� o co m co (D o (o o o o O d Oa ccoo U) 0) 0) U) (0 co O O O O O O O O O O O O O N N N d' :IliV' (n V V V zi V 'tV' •cY V N •u 2 L X (0 X O X o X X CD X (O X O x O X U) x C. X (O X O X O X (O N Q r co (O r O) r O) (o r LO r (O M Cl) J C N C O (0 (0 10 tO r r N N M M O O O O co co M co N N 00 co m m N N N N O fC cn > y) Y O o O O O O o O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O Q O U c 0 o o O o 0 0 0 0 (V C U N N 'a (a O N N O `1 0 r O (O N o (O O co O C. 00 r U) N J (O r V. (O N O CR (n N (O (D r U 7 b _ 00 0 0 C) a 0 0 C) C) C. - co -a U U f0 (0 co O E co V' N (n (0 N co 'V co O (O Cl) (O CD F a) V' co V co C) N O (0 (O N Cl) V' N (D N f0 r (O N (O c0 'C (O N N C co C V C C (O C co N L F 7 E E E a E a E a E a O 'c E d =_ L O v N a w N a a O a O O O > a) > m a m -a (n -o w -o O > C E O > m > d > 0 (D a) '� '9 'S '9 0 E (� LL to m m y y 0 0 m m m m 0 O U (O O C_ O C_ O C_ O -1 y Y U s' y -Y y y O C O C_ O C O C s' p N O O C O a O O (n (n O U (n O O (n (1J Y O co U) O O C O O _G 0 (n Z CD N C 0 C C a) C C T F y E c > z O 3 m O 3 m `0 c > c Q t Z a m m m E c 0 r a o L E 0 m C m E c T o Dl o O w W u i0 a) C C N � a) � O ca C L p CO p m 4. U U (n m d m ca Q V O C. O cam- �N- (O (o r N �-- a a a a a n a o o n a n o o U) y 'L a (n (a m d Packet Pg. 398 9.C.3 LL (g O aNi Cl! rn CO o C) rn 0 m a) o (q m 0 m U) o N N H3 EA N Vj fA 613 N ef3 M EA M U) 6A> R LL N N m 00 O0 CD N IDr N r O CD V O Coo M v > r (n ro v v o? m Q N N N N .-- M M N O OCl) O O O r M M Co O e N C O) m m CD <{ 7 ((C M r O Q U O O m n n N m r CA a CO M Co V M N Cl! W ` �� 69 EA EA K3 Ef3 ff3 EA EA ER ryOry�1� � 00 ai m V- O N M Cfl O O0 V O N Q (n N m Co m V m V O0 V W f� O OJ CDm m O 00 m N U) Ef3 H3 fA Vi fA EA EA � OHO a. N •-I LL N N m r N N N N N r r r (O CO � CoW M O > Q y r N O N N N N N O7 .- O M Co m N M LO O O C. (D O O Cl) O O O O O 'cF O O) m m m m m (3) 00 m M N (I O O (0 O0 C, O 0)N m U m 0 m r r 0) Co m fl (O C\lm m m Cli a LO M N V 7 � N {_ N f/) [f3 EA EA EA EA E9 ua r: 60 EH 1C M (O E U.(A Co rn rn Co ro CoLO 0) 3 N 69 GG 69 EH e9 � en O O 0 f0 `LL N N m 1- N v r N N r I--m o (n ID Q > r (O Cl M N N � O Q N .-- N N N — M M m Y Ci M 0 d' 0 m o m v Com o 0 m o O r )n V N O N m m V M m O (O M W a` n o M Ccc o v v � LO m N 0 U (» es e3 (» E N U lO O N M (O CO m O CO / 1 " E U. t� m ro Corn rn m ro Corn rn 6e Corn V) � ` O N ffl e9 ee fA 64 EA CA 6M9 ee% d = LO a.,d � '' N Co (O m r w r r Co Co (O � O Z3 O r CD CO N N CO rO:L O vLa y.. CCD DUV CoN N N N M Co m� c` O m C = G) O Cf N r o 0 o r (O o m r LO o 0 o O r In m �M a N O lip '� m tO (o (I m m m m (o m (0 CL 0'> (O f0 y L d N Oa` (o (0n oM m v v Co rn N 00 O d o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 v V N V' M M M M M M M M M M Z L X LO X CD X 'IT X X X 00 X O X (O X (O x U)(O X rt+ MnO 00 r Co (O LO U) V 00 00 O7 O0 Mn J C Q U r M M Co N O M N Co M O (O (O r CO M c- CO M O (a O) (a O O O O O O O O O O O > y 0 w O L-. O O O w O Y O Z-� O O O O Q O c N N M ] CD C) (0 CD N U 0 Z 0 U O U 0 U 0 U 0 (A 0 U .Q .o - .p Ll O 00 p N � r 00 C')7p (O p Co 00 (O J Q QU aO+ S IO O U - tO N U - m 00 U S V� O U S M U) U 1 Cl! O U S (M O O O O Cl! O 'a 7 O O O O O O O L N_ c U U U U U U U ; O Cor O E r d' m m V (0 N N U) O m N r cc N m m N m E V U) C M MM0 W G •C (rO C LO )O 0 N 0 O 0 C L H 7 0 0 0 o d S O � Q O C ,J O in U) C :a > O) c C O C .O a c ,CO C 01 J O) E O N U 2 R 2 c o 2 0 = d 0 m a = ++ J O 2 J L O •a L UO U C .00-.0 � ❑ O CO 5 ❑ N N Q ❑ 4 ❑ A N Q O LL Y J Cn EU) (n O` C (0 U O1 O U Q) W 0 O C 0 N 2 C 'p m 0 O N a 0) E i Co W C GI UI W d) u Z U C O 0 O w N m tm •> U C N UI OC U) N y — — N •� Ui = Ui Co O )p a a) U) Y u L LL N a Co U N a L LL N a L CL L LL N a N m a L LL N a O H Y J YO CO CA Z Z Z Z Z Z a m o m (O Co co m (O m v m m Co m m Packet Pg. 399771 9.C.3 In aV N m m c LL o 69 o � m 69 �2 v (e cD ee EO at � Cl) � o V jLL r V 'V, m N m Q U) N N N N N N 1 N O) 7 Lo m N (o (n O e C Oi a) 7 P- O d' (O d_ m Q C C U a r N (n W Lo co O m d' M M V Efl 69 a cco o Hj 01 W E I� O (fJ Cl) o7 (O m f- N (O O? N (n O m (() M d' l(j coN o N (a 6s H) 6N9 69 69 69 69 69 69 (A 69 pp ( C C W t Lo cl) Co Lo NN > LL Q co (I N ;t N r N (00 N V V N N N N .r- N � N O U) O O o V' O) O m (O o m m O 't a) U m d' m m ,I-o N I� m m m m O d' m (nm (n m m m N O• r o Lo (L of co N co c\lN 69 (n co fA M M 6s O) M 69 N N 69 O) (9 69 0 Efl e% fA d (O M N W M V (O (� m E LL V: O Oeq co � Ln M co V co 'cY M M 3 N 69 Efl 64 _ 69 69 69 EA ua 64 O � 0 0 ro N N m NCL > LL N 7 m V '�t oc Q� N N N N N N .-- N � m Y Ci o 0 o m m m m m m V M m m m m m m V' (O m m m O OD m m m Or N (O m N m m a` (m0 V N u) N � N � m N � N � �6ed (m0 U N (O O N o7 N (D m O �U U `� (to O O Nn (Mf) (n Efl (f1 ffl �_ 69 co ER ^ i y u) 6) H) 69 69 j z3 H r '^ r CD a it Nt oc '7 IDo0 M �_ 0 CD 'O` .Q N N N N N N N c C/) d C m N ^L N m m m 'cl' m m m a. p) � A, li W a d m m m W m m I� M � m N O i 4) as J J`� N ) N cd co co �N(�7- U d I O 6M9 L V � ++ N O M O c7 o M O (o N ;t N O O O O O 2 Z ,2 L (n X X X oo X V X LO X Lo X N (O X N X N (O X O N X O t� rt+ (O M M J 3 C o C O (O (O M M d' V V V � m o O O O ((J � N N dN' NN O ID Q U O m m m m �? o 0 0 0 o o m o 0 o m o m o > N Q O Y o o Y O o y :5 o o )17 o o m r o o 0 0 N LC o d' o M N U (o (o io o Z Z o m a m p o QI O N o I- M O O N N COL J a a� .(�•, a p C) o Iq u) 0 oq 'r o Cl o O m aCq V N 'a V% O O O O O O O (q o U U U U U U U ; O E CO N m N (mO ti N W O a0 G m y r E coo (No E o m ((o r (Mn m (o m O C F 2 O 2 L R 'NO 'No N N LL aa)) aa)) S N N y w o o Q E E �q E E C E E O J v m _ _ r = m r 2 O 2 U 1a C t O = U 3 C r N U Oo = r (0 c Co c c (6 c (0 c (D O t (0 c s (6 C N y Q O` 0 Q O 0 C C .J J C J J 0_ C J C C J (>o o 0 ma o 0 m _3 E y 000 m w E ~ E E E V Z Z C C N C N C Iq d O C a) Cu N = m (n o N m W m O C J 3 H N O a) J 7 d (n O J U) O C J yr Q •N •l.1 Q Q' Q K m N M m N N m m m > y _ _ N _ N c,4 =p m 4! a L n_ L a- a) a L a. a L C L o .0 o C 1 LL L n .0 a C L a ro t a W z z z O O O O N M N O M cc Packet Pg. 460 9.C.3 m 0 LL C. v Eft M R 00 m >� v r O N O N o r N oc U � ' a` 69 OR (n E0 L V o LL (O N O Cl)M O O fq E9 OJ EA Cl)(D VI O Eft O Eft m Eft _� Eli W 07 .0 (O (O M d LL N I� (O M zt N r r Co (O 4) r Q N N Cl) N N N r (n r 0] CO CO O 0 ,u I- ti (A O� U A d N M m CO d 7 r Co Co 0)M VM' Eft Eft Eft ( O Eft L Eft 60 Eft m (O M cM LL t� m m m 0)rn m m EA EA 64 (ft w rn W (p to lO (O M > (+- n m N rn m (f°o n Q y N N Co N N N r Q1 C.J' (n rn o 0 0 0 M Gl d) (p (n W V O (A O O (D O) (3) oz U a` `tEn- m• LO Co r- v r? m m M M 0? v o LL C }^E i.. to Co N Co (O m ��^y O N Eft Eft Ef) EA EA EA Efi Efi EftCo Eft i N ' N d) O (O (o (o (O Co LL N N r d) O (A (00 � r O I_ ,Q Q N N N Co Co N N N N (O r IR V C OI a N O W (O o O 0 O O O 'Q N N C V � (3 m � O W a U (n (n m Co In Co M O O Co M Co Co m °' N C O � u � ri v y rn N o C) LO (0 (n (M LO M (0 M 0 (O 0 (Oo Ix O Ix N N N (n O (O G W (O (O (O LO 't V N J C O V V O O Q1 (A V 00 00 O O 00 CO m m C. o I� r Q U r r r O to w N O O O O O N O O N @ O = O m O = O .00 (Z' 0 C)O C)L O L CD Q O c O 'C N V (o o ri Tf O U 0 (u o 0 0 0 Z U Z Z Z Z a O N N N N N N d M p M (O N O N O W O Q Q U CV U M U (D U N V O O) U O U ..0+ C) O d' N It O O C) _ 0 _ N 7 t/1 O U O U O U O U O U U .I O U O ti LO d' 7 O N 3 m O E O O N r � J ti V O h C N N O 00 CoO F U 2 0 O O N 0 G m N a) N N w O v (6 C N N to (A (U 00 (] G E E E O E E U Co0 m 2 0 0 2 o 2 m 0 m 2 0 2 m m 7�) U J OI J J C J J N Co N = 0 ~ LL N .N i7 (D > (D (6 (D E 3 aD c (U 2 rmNy R m aZ 41 )c aNi G m > i > O Z O m d N U N 0yU '0j N N O N N O. r N C N LL 0.. W O_ CO D_ a-O. d. 0_ N LL i a Cn CaU)V) 6 Co wO- fq F C > a o 0 0 Cl) (D (0 CO V CO l(') LO 0 w CD U) E 3 V O 0 Q Y u m W U d U U LO CD 0 CD CD N CD J d u N R N E L O J E L f0 CD MO W O V C CD E L V m r Q Packet Pg. 401 1 (0 (o O o (o 0 LL O (n N m EA Omi EA N 6 N 69 r 6s 6N9 N O) Co CO Q7 O m r _ O LL (( CQ m � ( V N N O r r O O r LO 0) (�O ((C m CD� Co U O O (O Co O V ao 'I" 0 LO LO L LO (o (n o o (n m LL Cl) CO Cl) (A � W rn N N N m O N N U3 EA EA Efl di (A G7 07 R Cl) Co 6 0) CO > LL W Nw ((O Q N N N - .- N N T N N (0 LO CO W 0) m O V) m ((J O O O Co 0 O 4 0 o L m 69 m m c m LL N m N N a) Ffl Efl V) EA Cli QD (» (A N 01 00 00 D1 Co d) 00 (O 1rt) Vi � (rn m �(rn d' Q y N N N .- N N rn Ci o 0 O o O o (n M 41 d) O m Q) 0) Q1 O) D) 0) d) d) W Co l0 00 00 00 00 a` EO O 7 O � O (n (O Cl? LL M a M a M Co Com N(M- W, O O O ON b4 um� 6% d '^ Cn � •� 2 � r N r N Co (m0 (m0 r N IL (0 (n m (n c0 (O (() (O (O //O�� -Q Q N N N N N V C/) m O o m O m O O O m /\ i�i� Na N 0) O) m O) N m m m N M 0) 0) m O) 0) 0) m c0 a 2 LO 0) LO 0) o O LOo m O LO rn ti r Cl) CA e LO Q 6q � VU) m LO 00 LO m L m m LO m LO M U) m N X X X X X X X X A! y ((0 Co (n (0 U) (O (DLO Cl) Co O J CY C N C O 0 C. O O N N Co Co O O N Q U It ItN N N 0 O CD O > w L O O O O O L O Q O O O Co N O N O N U 0 c0 O m a > O U O o O 0 00 (q r (O I- m m r p U Cl O m m r O O Co O O N -L O O o U) �_ U U _ A N o f 7 O) Co Co N 0) v CO O H � 7p Y 't r O N O O o •E v m 00 m r v N F M OO O O ~ O O O O CI rn O O O O ! j N O O N 0 0 C N tJ Q LL y Z (U N N N N N N N N N N W Z Q O _ _ @CL C T (6 N ; N W >. U N > o s N LUULLJU _ En _ N O L L L .0 L 'a L L a N a a a a. a c IL IL E C ^Q aC. IC V LO 0 w O v N C N E 3 u O 0 Q Y V rm W U d U U CD r 0 O O 0 N CD J d V C� G fC E L O J E R 7 O m d O V E t u m Q Packet Pg. 402 1 U) a G U O w N W o W N Y w C �O l0 r U CD 7 J O O U W Q' 0 C Ea E a v a` ^O^ CL ^+ 7 J W LL Q .L] / C J N Q C > JVco W L I Q O O O O 0 O O 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 O O O m O (T) M Cl) 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O CD : 04 ,^- a00 <Y ro m 00 ro 0 0 0 0 N N N N 0 0 o O M M M M O 00 Cl) v ro O O O O CD C LO o LO LO CO V in in in w O O O O O 0 o 0 0 0 0 r- r- 0) Lo LL LL LL LL N al 0 O Z Gl O U Un � a U m a O N > 0 U Z tY N N N N N Ly N N N N Ca Q CT) m (3) m F O N O N O N O N C E E E E Co Co Co N a Li CL n. > (D w w w w n U) LL LL LL LL LL Q Lo O o 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O ,It It 0 CDm N N O CO 0 CO CO 0) v N M Co O M O x O o 0 LO in N O c w _ LL LL N (U 0 O Z v O U Ua w > N O @ LL E O N LL — 3 �) (D > Li w _ m ro N lC LL Z) dw N O O O O 0 O O O O O U� �! r- O It W m O 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O m m m 0 0 0 N N N 00 N N m r r 00 00 I-- o <r 00 Co m O O LO LO Ox X X X CoLo Lo Lo 'I Un 0 y y N O M LO r- Ln m C) (D r- a) a) a) ro w LL LL LL LL N .0 O Z d O U 0 0 0 0 x x x x CUJ U U U C N a O a W U C7 ~ C ¢O CO O O a > a a a La w w w w a F U) LL LL LL LL � LL LL LL LL Q Co N 0 0 O 0 O 0 0 O 0 0 O O O CC) O N 0 o O o 0 O O O O O c N O Co 0 N r r N Co Co 00 00 O O 04 ox0 x ' CD CD 'ITO O M U! fA N N (D a) w w y w LL LL LL LL M N N N N d 0 L 0 O O O Z Z Z U N N O O O U U U Ua) a` a ) E E a� 2 2 U U � U U � 0 2O C -C, a N O > O O _ N fq O � La a) >> FO- H N 0 O m N c aLLI a a > ° m f0 w w o ° w t w (r z E F" U Z) D LL 2 LL > > > Q Q Q N O Cl) N M N 9.C.3 o d —� CE m N raj A, O W W / .. v Lf'! E.1 O CD N Packet Pg. 403 N N G N N W C U) a U 0 W Co a O• C W o Y Z m fn N G O m c UCo p i J v (n O U N f0 Ol w C A E a m I O �N ^ Yip 3 7 J A\ LL 0 w o E .0 OJo Z3 U) N J .fl ,�+ m O� a >_ J u L LL O O O O O O O aD Co CO M O O O O O O m o Co O O rn o Q Cl) Co M O Co 00 (D Cl) O O o O CD C. 00 a Co M Co O O O O O o Co Cl) O Ci Li 0 0 U) N O U N i 0 U L � O 2 m` m` O O H F O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O LO 0 LS NV N LO Co C) Co M T 00 Lo (0 LO iw MCD N Iq N r- 00 Y LL LL- c v U G1 O U 0 U O O O O O 0 LO W ti N O M 3 Li N d 0 0 Z N O O U y n. O N U W a� O U Lo LO LO O C. O O 0 Lo LO O N a O• Ul d r 0 Z N O U UN N E 2 CD O O O O O QO O O 0 O O 0 O Co Co O N Li N m 0 Z U O J 0 a U c J o U m >c O O 0 O O O LQ CD 0 N w ii w af0, 0 0 Z U N J p v U c o U aNi c I O O 00 O O O O O 0 O O r- r O N Y ii 0 3 t 0 Z N v a O N U > O U a J O 21 LL Q N N N N t6 N G1 f0 J C J 4 N C C fC (0 O 'N @ (0 in "= N O 'N N 0 " LL T- O d> m w=> m ¢ rn a rn j W a U W W O m W J 0 W N W N 0 W W L W 0 0 2 Cu 2 Q! �. .O >> D .D O M a LL' Y m d' D Co x D d' D 7 -� .N u m F- N F- F- Cl)F- 0 a' F- J F- - F- 0- F m F- > w :o Co d LL c a- D LLLL D LL c`a E D LL 3 r a D u `m D LL v LL O LL > m LL y = = U u W y Q Q m Co U U W Z a O LO LO N O O O O O O O Co N O m N CD C. o O O O O o O o It a2 0 0 0 c` N �-- M N O cn N o Cl) N CO 0 O M CN X X L? LO y N O O LL LL N d U Gl O U CO c ' N O O U `o a T � F0 F- LL N G1 Y N J N N 10 U 0 v � F c m N CO m O R _ = J N > m � >o m D z :3 N m LL d o. W 'R N C d E 3 u O 0 CL R Y V m m U a. N V C?J � o v 0 J O O N w O C10 CD =ti N N CD a m N J � U V 4 � 2 Mn 7 N O J Q Packet Pg. 404 0 0 y u > cn N O O r M 0 O O Cl) 0 N y Li N t E 7 coo 0- 0 `w U 0 0 0 0 =o o ca U T co 7 �7 Q N a c �a N t Of cu aLL o. N W O O I- I- 0 O O co 0 N N w Li N = �C 7 L6 0 ca. U)a `y U o 0 U c, o o U T co 7 O O O 0 O r 0 N N LL N t 'C O Co 0 0- U 0 v U 00 U 0. U - o o cD T m 7 CD N v �- 3 � c � =o LL p .x = m W U LL a a LL 00 O O O O O O O O N N 0 0 O O o O O O ,It O V' N N ro O CNO N M v v N o N M o � o x L? 0 0 0 Cn 10 N O N N N w y Li Li N N L .0 C (Q m 0 0. a 0 0 0 o 0 U 0. a m 0 O O U U (D m m lTJ m � 7 O � N A - � 2 � � v o F- y Z C >. M O O � N Y CL >— N w L 3 v O LL LL U. M O O O O O O O O V m C CO o O o 0 O O O O O O O O rn rn rn 0 0 o co O O O r r r 0 r- CO Cl) LO LO LO M M C2 L" LO o Ln b O LO r- m N N N LO O L LO cn fl Li LL Li N N .0 r- 0 Z `m 0 U 0 U > > 7 LL a a a U N d N N W L w N O O O N 0 i0 OC N 0 0 N m F- U W LL c W v v v o f/1 C7 a a a > W W W a 3 ~ F U) RC D D D T LL LL LL d W O O O 0 O O O 2 O O rn 0 N N LO co N N In rn c� V .0 0 0 U) w 0 U O i2 U � O m 0 O O O O O (O O O O 0 O O O N Cl N O 0 y Li U) Q r I 0 Z d - m o °' o U c W N O U 9.C.3 M V 1 C c �I ♦ a E m N N a C pip ei V W LO D CD rn E N � � V .. Q 3 LL LT LL c 0 J Packet Pg. 405 y G G7 ._ Q7 y C U) a c 0 X O ty W O N N Z Y N G O C Q U �p j J I u) N 2 ❑ v O U di d' C m E L ^\ L. J LL `� C O �.L J❑ }, : O ^� W U)J N \ / N C ^W .fl O >_ �Q .JVC L :L z O O O O O O O O 0 Co LO M 00 N O O O O O O O O O O O C. T T T O o 0 N N N O O M N O d � o LO N CO 00 N O OM OM O O 00 0 N r r U)o U) C) O W r O 0 d N N w C LL LL LL N N L .00 t t 7 0 7 7 U) a) Z N U) Cl E "w Gl N - a •- - - 0 ° 6 0 ac a a� U U U E U E a = a U ❑ U c U U O a) N _ ❑ ❑ 0 D 6 O) ❑ N ul i a N C y O — a C_ C E in U � N N > > _ B W N W N U O o D ayi ay N i m Q Q N �d-. .L 30 N U1 .00 m a a W a LL v a c m 0. 0. z z ti Co Co Co O O O O O O O O O O V M M LO c00 N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 CN N ' M M LO N O N N N � � a •a M o V) LO � a N M M CON t!1 to N N C. 0 0 0 O r- r- r N O) a) O N d d V LL LL LL- LL w�yY N O t O Z U U U U y C C C C Oa a a a U o o O o o CD (D (D (7 U O O O O C C C C ly Of � � L L C L F Q L 0 O N Z � c=i 0 C H O C T 7 LO (0 O E r C .0 L N N LL a- a-rL > 0)W W W W 'n OLL LL LL- LL N m 0 O O O O O O O O O O W 0) C) CO Co O � r r M O O O O O O O O O O O O N C)N rn rn 0 0 N N v v N GAO N N 0) M N O O O V d 7 (V X X X X CD C CD UJ U1 N w 't o O N W 0 M (U CO r Co C6 U- LL LL LL N N 0 O Z v 0 U 0 U LL U t t. O N Z m r C I- M t C O M E O r -r- 0 L N Z d d d > O m D Z) Z) Z) O O) N G! C LL LL LL LL A O O O O O O O O LO X 0 O O w LL a N 0 O Z U `y c oa U o 6 0 U 0 N 0 r r O O C. O O O CD N O O 0 O O OCO Packet Pg. 406 2 N G 4 Cn O1 N C in a fC C U O W m a ! a C W O d) Y r C D m C U � N O G) U (0 d) C m E IL 1 i 7 0 ^, LL rig O C '� i O OfU)N = O .n ++ a� v O� >_ J V � �a W L �F+ LL m d 0 In O O N . �> W a rn d Cn O O O O O O O O O C) O O O Cl) O Cl) LO LO O v U M V m LO O O O 0 0 C) N U) w w LL Li 3 t 0 0 Z Cl O N U m (1) U n- C- 06 -6 0 0 Y Y Y Y T m m O N F- rn C O O � N 7 > O W W LL (r 0 7 Y D D a > N LL LL H O W O 0 O O ro 0 N M 0 LO v U) 0 5 N CA 3 t 0 Z m o i U m � C O U d 06 O ' Y m N Co m O N l0 N L) C a .N m i a a N F- M Cl) w O O� C CO LL E F Co O O O O O Co I LL a E L w m LL LL F Co O O O 0 O O CD Cn O y LL 0 0 N N U 0 E U O 2 `m N J U) 7 LL w m D O ~ T > LL 2 F_ W Co O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O Co V 0 v CMO V O M 7 O O O o O o ti U) w w LL LL s 0 0 Z N 0 U O U m O O U)) O 7 m •fU LL d 3 U LU v L) x 0 U Cn C LL LL f0 7 O O O O o C-)f LO O (D O CD LO O) Cn CD u) LL c d U m O i U m C O d U o6 o Y LL 06 LL (n LU 0 LL LL O LO LO LO Co LO Co C14 W d' O N C) Cl CM v LO N N L O N Ili 9.C.3 G �9 d a r E- m LC Q N a N C C '^C oD V ei .. m LO 40 CD N O C N � u d o C C O C Co v± O C v Sc 'O C w a m m � o � U � a Z � Packet Pg. 407 9.C.3 APPENDIX C CN 13 C E 7 V O Q Y V R m U a U U LO r r O O O O O N O N J a E 0 J L _(D �0 W L d c m E t c� R a Packet Pg. 4 8771 FY 2020 Income Limits Documentation System - Median Income Calcul... littps://www.huduser.gov/portal/datasets/il/il2020/202OMed 9.C.3 '■'�' FY ZOZO INCOME LIMITS DOCUMENT) SYSTEM HUD.gov HUD User Home Data Sets Fair Market Rents Section 8 Income Limits MTSP Income Limits HUD LIHTC Database Median Family Income Calculation Methodology Estimates of median family income for metropolitan and non -metropolitan areas are developed as follows: 1. A special tabulation of Median Family Income (MFI) estimates from the 2013-2017 5-year ACS was prepared by the U.S. Census Bureau and used ... by HUD as the basis for calculating HUD's FY2020 MFIs. Estimates of MFI from this tabulation are used if they are determined to be statistically reliable. For FY2020, the test for reliability is whether the margin of error for the estimate is less than 50% of the estimate itself and whether the ACS estimate is based on at least 100 survey cases. Note: HUD began using the count indicator in assessing statistical reliability beginning with the FY 2020 Fair Market Rent estimates. HUD does not receive the exact number of survey cases in this special tabulation, but rather a categorical variable known as the count indicator, indicating a range of cases. An estimate based on at least 100 cases corresponds to a count indicator of 4 or higher. If an area does not have a reliable 2013-2017 5-year estimate, HUD checks whether the area has had minimally reliable estimates in any of the past 3 years (a minimally reliable estimate is an estimate where the margin of error for the estimate is less than 50% of the estimate itself). If so, the FY2020 MFI is the average of the inflated ACS estimates. In order to use as much local data as possible, HUD averages the minimally reliable estimates from the last three 5-year ACS estimates. If an area has not had a minimally reliable estimate in the past 3 years, HUD checks whether the area has had minimally reliable estimates in any of the past 2 years. If so, the FY2020 MFI is the average of the inflated ACS estimates. In order to use as much local data as possible, HUD E E a a U LO 0 co 0 Packet Pg. 409 I of 4 FY 2020 Income Limits Documentation System - Median Income Calcul... https://www.hudusei-.gov/portal/datasets/il/il2O2O/202OMed 9.C.3 2. 3. averages the minimally reliable estimates from the last two 5-year ACS estimates. If an area has not had a minimally reliable estimate in the past two years, the estimate from the next larger encompassing geography is used. For example, sub -areas of metropolitan areas would be assigned the MFI estimate of the entire metropolitan area and for non -metropolitan counties, the estimate from all non-metrpolitan potions of the State (state non -metropolitan). If there is a statistically reliable 2017 1-year ACS estimate of median family income available, HUD replaces the 5-year data with the 1-year data. For FY2020, the special tabulation of 2017 1-year ACS MFI estimates provided to HUD by the U.S. Census Bureau for the Naples-Immokalee- Marco Island, FL MSA was statistically reliable. Once the appropriate 2017 ACS data has been selected, an inflation factor ......................... based on the CBO projection of the national CPI for FY2020 is calculated to inflate the estimate from 2017 to April, 2020 (or mid FY2020). Note: The CPI projection used in this calculation is from the CBO's January 2020 release of it's 10-Year Economic Projections. MFI Step by Step Calculation 1. The following are the 2017 American Community Survey 5-year median income estimate, margin of error, and sample size category for Naples-Immokalee- Marco Island, FL MSA: ACS2017 ACS2017 Sample Area 5-Year 5-Year Ratio Size Result Median Margin Category Income of Error 0.027 < .5 Naples- $1,989 / and 6.0 Immokalee- 72,804 >= 4 $72,804 $1,989 6 Marco Island, FL MSA 0.027 Reliable Estimate 2. Since there is a 1-year 2017 ACS estimate available, the margin of error of the Packet Pg. 410 2 of 4 FY 2020 Income Limits Documentation System - Median Income Calcul... https://www.hudusei-.gov/portal/datasets/il/il2020/202OMed 9•C.3 estimate and the sample size category are checked for reliability: Area ACS2017 1-Year Median Income ACS2017 1-Year Margin of Error Ratio Sample Size Category Result 0.075 < .5 and 6.0 >= 4 Naples- $5,831 / Immokalee- $77,538 $77,538 $5,831 6 Use Marco Island, _ ACS2017 FL MSA 0.075 1-Year Median Income 3. The calculation of the CPI Inflation Factor is as follows: ..................... FY2020 2017 CPI Inflation Area CPI Annual CPI Factor ................. (260.3 / Naples-Immokalee-Marco 245.12) Island, FL MSA 260.3 245.12 1.06193 4. The FY 2020 median family income is estimated as follows: ACS2017 FY 2020 CPI Inflation Area 1-Year Area MFI Factor Estimate Estimate ($77,538 Naples-Immokalee- 1.06193) $77,538 1.06193 Marco Island, FL MSA $82,340 5. In keeping with HUD policy, the median family income estimate is rounded to the nearest $100: c a� Q a c� LO 0 W 0 N Packet Pg. 411 3 of 4 FY 2020 Income Limits Documentation System - Median Income Calcul... https://www.huduser.gov/portal/datasets/il/il2O2O/202OMed Unrounded Rounded Area FY 2020 MFI FY 2020 MFI Estimate Estimate Naples-Immokalee-Marco $82,340 $82,300 Island, FL MSA NOTE: Due to differences in the computing platforms used to generate the official FY 2020 MFI estimates, and this web system, the calculated value shown may differ slightly from the official published value because of rounding. Press below to select a different state: Select a new state Or select a FY 2020 HUD Metropolitan FMR Area's Median Family Income: Naples-Immokalee-Marco Island, FL MSA Select Area Update URL for bookmarking or E-mailing Technical Problems or questions? Contact Us. Packet Pg. 412 4of4 9.C.3 George Russell Weyer President Real Estate Econometrics, Inc. 707 Orchid Drive Naples, FL 34102 (239) 269-1341 rweyer@ree-i.com Overview Over 25 years of real estate development experience in Florida, Ohio and Nevada with large corporations and family -owned companies that focused on commercial office, retail, industrial, hospitality, amenity and large scale community and residential development. Senior management experience with the entire development process from acquisition identification, due diligence, purchase negotiations, financing, planning and securing entitlements, horizontal and vertical construction, sales/leasing and marketing, to property management and condominium turnover and disposition. Skills also include land acquisition, land planning, entitlement process, financing proforma development, market analysis, land development, community development district management, financing and assessment determination, home and commercial construction, sales and Marketing management, builder selection and management, amenity design and management, residential and commercial property owners association management and design review committee management. Experience with governmental entities on budgeting, financing and identifying and implementing economic development programs. • Full member of the Urban land Institute and the past chairman of ULI's Southwest Florida District Council. Professional Experience • President, Real Estate Econometrics, Inc., Naples, FL 2014-Present Real Estate Econometrics, Inc., a full -service consulting firm specializing in financial, economic and fiscal analysis and implementation for real estate projects, is well -versed in all aspects of the real estate/land development process from determining the market and land acquisition through planning and development and finally marketing and land disposition. Performing real estate valuation analysis, entitlement analysis (commercial need, affordable housing, fiscal impact), CDD formation and management, CDD methodology consultant, commercial POA management, fiscal impact analysis of real estate projects, large scale development market analysis, economic impact analysis, government assessment methodology development, litigation support analysis, public/private partnership coordination, tax increment financing. c as E c as E Q a. U LO 0 co 0 N Packet Pg. 413 9.C.3 • Senior Associate, Fishkind & Associates, Inc., Naples, FL 2004-2014 Real estate valuation analysis, entitlement analysis (commercial need, affordable housing, fiscal impact), CDD formation and management, CDD methodology consultant, commercial POA management, fiscal impact analysis of real estate projects, large scale E development market analysis, economic impact analysis, government assessment methodology development, litigation support analysis, Cape Canaveral economic and E fiscal impact, annexation analysis, impact fee analysis, public/private partnership a coordination, tax increment financing. LO • V.P. Development, JED of Southwest Florida, Inc. Naples, FL 2003-2004 0 N Office complex design, construction and management, neighborhood retail complex design, construction and management, entitlement process management. c • President, GRW Management, Inc., Naples, FL 2001-2003 Market and entitlement analysis • President, London Bay Homes, Inc. subsidiary, Romanza, Inc. Naples, FL 2000-2001 Managed two offices of an interior design company. Turn around into profitable entity • V.P. Resort Operations, Lake Las Vegas Joint Venture, Las Vegas NV 1999-2000 Managed all commercial operations on site — 2 hotels, small retail center, two casinos, private community club, lake/marina operations, managed public and private golf course operations, designed and constructed third public golf course and clubhouse, community liaison for development company, design review committee chair, property owners association chair. President & CEO, Cavalear Corporation, Toledo, OH 1997-1999 Management of 3 master planned communities — one with lake and two with golf courses, development and construction management of 2 residential villa neighborhoods, unit construction for two villa developments, single family unit construction • Director of Commercial Sales, Amenity Management & Marketing, Westinghouse Communities, Inc. Naples/Fort Myers, FL 1983-1997 Amenity manager, managed public and private golf courses, builder program manager, builder sales manager, model row development, marketing manager for two large scale master planned communities — Pelican Bay and Gateway, started and managed Pelican Landing and Pelican Marsh marketing departments. Education University of Miami, Miami, FL MBA 1993 Michigan State University, Bachelor of Arts, Communications, 1977 Packet Pg. 414 9.C.3 EXHIBIT V.D.1 as E COLLIER BLVD LORDS WAY MIXED USE SUBDISTRICT NARRATIVE AND JUSTIFICATION Q SITE DESCRIPTION: a. t� The subject property is 68.78± acres in size and located in Section 14, Township 50 South, Range c 26 East, Collier County, Florida. The property is located at the northeastern corner of the c intersection of Collier Blvd. and The Lords Way, with existing points of ingress/egress via The Lords Way. The subject property is presently designated Urban, is located within the Mixed -Use Subdistrict, and designated Collier Blvd Community Facility Subdistrict. The site is presently zoned MPUD (First Assembly Ministries Education & Rehabilitation Campus) and is subject to a companion PUD rezoning application. Surrounding Property: GMP FLUM Designation Zoning Land Use North Urban — Urban Residential Fringe A, MPUD (Hacienda Undeveloped Subdistrict Lakes South Urban — Urban Residential Fringe A, RPUD (Lords The Lords Way; then Subdistrict Way 30 Ac.) undeveloped, and single family residential East Urban — Urban Residential Fringe MPUD (Hacienda Undeveloped Subdistrict Lakes West Urban — Urban Residential PUD (Naples Lakes Collier Blvd., then Subdistrict Count Club) multi -family SPECIFIC NATURE OF PROPOSED GMP AMENDMENT: This is a large scale GMPA to amend the Collier Blvd Community Facility Subdistrict to allow multi -family residential development at a density not to exceed 9.7 units per acre. The Subdistrict is 68.78± acres in size, and partially developed with multi -family dwelling units and a church. All community facility related uses will be removed from the site and redeveloped with multifamily residential and/or an Assisted Living Facility (ALF). GMP AND STATUTORY CONSISTENCY EVALUATION: A. Urban Mixed Use District This District, which represents approximately 116,000 acres, is intended to accommodate a variety of residential and non-residential land uses, including mixed -use developments such as Planned Unit Developments. Certain industrial and commercial uses are also allowed subject to criteria... H:\2019\2019076\WP\GMPA\Resubmittal\Exhibit V.D1 - Narrative and Justification (2-12-2021).docx Packet Pg. 415 9.C.3 The proposed amendment achieves the intent of the Urban Mixed Use District as the site is presently zoned MPUD and the proposed multi -family dwelling units will increase the variety of residential land uses offered in Collier County. This parcel is appropriate for conversion to higher density that will address a market need, and maximizes the efficient use of existing public facilities and services based on its location within urban designated lands, along a principal arterial. Q a. Consistency with FLUE Objective 5: t9 Implement land use policies that promote sound planning, protect environmentally sensitive Ln lands and habitat for listed species while protecting private property rights, ensure compatibility W CD of land uses and further the implementation of the Future Land Use Element. Policy 5.3: All rezonings must be consistent with the Growth Management Plan. Policy 5.4: All applications and petitions for proposed development shall be consistent with this Growth Management Plan, as determined by the Board of County Commissioners. Policy 5.5: Discourage unacceptable levels of urban sprawl in order to minimize the cost of community facilities by: confining urban intensity development to areas designated as Urban on the Future Land Use Map .... This is not a rezone; however, if this GMP Amendment is adopted, the subsequent zoning amendment must demonstrate consistency with the GMP, including the elements of this proposed amendment. The Subdistrict is located within the County's Urban District. The proposed amendment discourages sprawl by confining urban intensity development to Urban designated areas. The property is bordered on the west by a 6-lane principal arterial and served by CAT transit services. Policy 5.6: New developments shall be compatible with, and complementary to, the surrounding land uses, as set forth in the Land Development Code. The MPUD will include development and design standards, including those set forth in the LDC, that ensure development will be compatible with and complementary to the surrounding area. Consistency with FLUE Objective 7. Promote smart growth policies, reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and adhere to the existing development character of the Collier County, where applicable, and as follows: Policy 7.1: The County shall encourage developers and property owners to connect their properties to fronting collector and arterial roads, except where no such connection can be made without violating intersection spacing requirements of the Land Development Code. The property has direct access to Collier Boulevard, a six -lane principal arterial via an existing access point to The Lords Way, a two-lane local road. H:\2019\2019076\WP\GMPA\Resubmittal\Exhibit V.D1 - Narrative and Justification (2-12-2021).docx Packet Pg. 416 9.C.3 Policy 7.2: The county shall encourage internal accesses or loop roads in an effort to help reduce vehicle congestion on nearby collector and arterial roads and minimize the need for traffic signals. The MCP has been designed to encourage the use of internal access and/or loop roads to utilize existing access points to The Lords Way. Policy 7.3: All new and existing developments shall be encouraged to connect their local streets and/or interconnection points with adjoining neighborhoods or other developments regardless of land use type. The MCP allows for a future potential interconnection to the undeveloped Hacienda Lakes MPUD to the east. Policy 7.4: The County shall encourage new developments to provide walkable communities with a blend of densities, common open spaces, civic facilities, and a range of housing prices and types. Policy 7.5: The County shall encourage mixed -use development within the same buildings by allowing residential dwelling units over and/or abutting commercial development. The requested amendment will allow for additional residential development within an existing mixed -use development. Conservation and Coastal Management Element: Goal 6: To identify, protect, conserve and appropriately use native vegetative communities and wildlife habitat. Objective 6.1: Protect native vegetative communities through the application of minimum preservation requirements. Policy 6.1.1: For the County's Urban Designated Area ... native vegetation shall be preserved through the application of the following minimum preservation and vegetation retention standards and criteria. Coastal High Hazard Area Non -Coastal High Hazard Area Residential and Mixed Less than 2.5 acres 10% Less than 5 acres 10% Use Development Equal to or greater than Equal to or greater than 5 acres 2.5 acres 25% and less than 20 acres 15% Equal to or greater than 20 ac. 25% c as E c as E Q a. U LO 0 co 0 N H:\2019\2019076\WP\GMPA\Resubmittal\Exhibit V.D1 -Narrative and Justification (2-12-2021).docx Packet Pg. 417 9.C.3 The MPUD was originally approved in 2008 and placed 12.9± acres into a conservation easement within Tract G, in accordance with the requirements for native preservation of the GMP. No changes to the preserve are proposed with this application. Transportation/Traffic Considerations: Projected traffic impacts associated with the proposed GMPA/PUDA development scenario do not exceed the traffic impacts allowed under current zoning conditions. From a traffic standpoint, the proposed GMPA/PUDA development scenario is less intensive when compared to the maximum allowed under current zoning conditions. To provide more flexibility, the development will have the ability to adjust proposed parameters by converting multi -family residential dwelling units to assisted living facility units (beds), as applicable. Traffic generated by the proposed development alternative is less intensive than the estimated traffic calculated under current zoning conditions. Consistency with Florida Statutes relating to Plan Amendments, Chapters 163.3167(9), 163.3177 (6)(a) 2 and 8, and 163.3184. 163.3167(9) Each local government shall address in its comprehensive plan, as enumerated in this chapter, the water supply sources necessary to meet and achieve the existing and projected water use demand for the established planning period, considering the applicable plan developed pursuant to s. 373.709. 163.3177(6)(a)2 The future land use plan and plan amendments shall be based upon surveys, studies, and data regarding the area, as applicable, including: a. The amount of land required to accommodate anticipated growth. b. The projected permanent and seasonal population of the area. c. The character of undeveloped land. d. The availability of water supplies, public facilities, and services. e. The need for redevelopment, including the renewal of blighted areas and the elimination of nonconforming uses which are inconsistent with the character of the community. f. The compatibility of uses on lands adjacent to or closely proximate to military installations. g. The compatibility of uses on lands adjacent to an airport as defined in s. 330.35 and consistent with s. 333.02. h. The discouragement of urban sprawl. i. The need for job creation, capital investment, and economic development that will strengthen and diversify the community's economy. j. The need to modify land uses and development patterns within antiquated subdivisions. Response: The subdistrict is located within the County's Urban designated area. Paragraphs c, f, and g do not apply. With respect to paragraphs a, b, c, and d, the data and analysis provided clearly demonstrates a need for additional rental housing in Collier County, and the location is excellent in terms of addressing a portion of that need, in an urban area with existing public facilities and services are available and adequate to serve the site and proposed density. c as E c as E Q a. 2 U LO 0 W 0 H:\2019\2019076\WP\GMPA\Resubmittal\Exhibit V.D1 -Narrative and Justification (2-12-2021).docx Packet Pg. 418 9.C.3 Relative to paragraphs h and j, this parcel is appropriate for conversion to higher density that will E address a market need and maximize the efficient use of existing public facilities and services c based on its location within urban designated lands, along a principal arterial. Maximizing the E efficient use of existing public facilities and services in the urban area discourages sprawl by Q reducing the demand for conversion of rural lands to accommodate such demand. a. 2 0 As to paragraph i, the proposed multi -family development does not directly contribute to job L; creation and diversification of the County's economy, the lack of affordable rental housing W CD negatively impacts those objectives. If the supply is low in comparison to the demand, prices will remain high and will rise. Availability of workforce housing is an important consideration for Collier County to attract new or relocating businesses and allow existing businesses in to grow. 163.3177(6)(a)8 Future land use map amendments shall be based upon the following analyses: a. An analysis of the availability of facilities and services. b. An analysis of the suitability of the plan amendment for its proposed use considering the character of the undeveloped land, soils, topography, natural resources, and historic resources on site. c. An analysis of the minimum amount of land needed to achieve the goals and requirements of this section. Response: The proposed GMPA is consistent with the intent and procedural and substantive requirements set forth in the Florida Statue referenced above. In addition to this narrative report, we have provided other documents which collectively constitute sufficient data and analysis to reach that conclusion. In conclusion: • The request proposes an amendment to a subdistrict located within the County's Urban District. • There are adequate public facilities to serve the proposed residential density and commercial intensity. • Housing studies completed by Collier County and the Urban Land Institute also indicate the need for additional rental housing necessary to meet the current and foreseeable demand. • A market study done as part of this application indicates that the Project's 384 units will not adversely affect the Collier County residential condominium market and address the future demand for condominium units in Collier County thus prolonging the market for an additional year. The companion MPUD provides for site design elements that collectively ensure the compatibility of the project with uses on lands adjacent and in proximity. • The project complies with applicable statutory provisions and meets the statutory and County requirements sufficiently to warrant approval. H:\2019\2019076\WP\GMPA\Resubmittal\Exhibit V.DI -Narrative and Justification (2-12-2021).docx Packet Pg. 419 9.C.3 EXHIBIT V.E.1 as E COLLIER BLVD LORD'S WAY MIXED USE SUBDISTRICT PUBLIC FACILITIES REPORT May 13, 2021 Q a 2 Collier County Public Utilities will provide water service for potable and fire protection needs, as 0 well as wastewater service. The subject property is within the South Service Area. Collier County LO Public Utilities has sufficient capacity to provide water and sewer. c N The estimated potable water and wastewater average daily and peals requirements for the subject property are as follows: Potable Water 241,500 GPD average daily (Peak 313,950 GPD) Wastewater 172,500 GPD average daily (Peak 258,750 GPD) The calculations above consist of: 1. 690 dwelling units (296 dwelling units are existing). According to the Collier County 2020 AUIR, currently there is an existing landfill capacity of 13,289,577 tons, and a ten-year landfill capacity requirement of 2,812,413 tons. The estimated life of the landfill is 21 years. The proposed residential overlay will increase population by approximately 1,725 people at build -out (690 units at 2.50 persons per household). Using a tons per capita disposal rate of 0.62 per the AUIR, a population increase of 1,725 people will generate an additional 1,069.50 tons disposed. There is adequate landfill capacity to accommodate the additional tons per capita generated by the proposed project. Stormwater retention and detention will comply with SFWMD requirements, and State and County standards for off -site discharges will be met, resulting in no adverse impacts to stormwater management (drainage) level of service. The adopted level of service for schools based upon permanent FISH capacity: 100% for high school Concurrency Service Areas (CSAs); 95% for elementary CSAs; and 95% for middle school CSAs. The subject site is within the E3 Southwest Area North for elementary schools, the M2, Southwest Area for middle schools, and the H3, North Central Area for high schools. The E3 CSA includes two elementary schools, Avalon and Lely. They have a combined FISH capacity of 1,287 students, a 2019/2020 peak enrollment of 994 students, and a projected 2024/2025 enrollment of 1,052 students (82% capacity). According to the Collier County Public Schools CIP, enrollment at Avalon Elementary school is being monitored. The H3 and M2 CSAs include Golden Gate and Palmetto Ridge High Schools, and East Naples, Gulfview, and Manatee Middle Schools. The high schools have a combined FISH capacity of 3,886 students, a 2019/2020 peals enrollment of 3,888 students, and a projected 2024/2025 enrollment of 3,653 students (94% capacity). According to the Collier County Public Schools CIP, 1 HA2019\2019076\WP\GMPA\2nd Resubmittal\Exhibit V.E.1 - Public Facilities Report (5-13-2021).docx Packet Pg. 420 9.C.3 enrollment at Golden Gate and Palmetto Ridge High Schools is being monitored; and provide temporary alternatives to address overcrowding at Palmetto Ridge High school. The middle schools have a combined FISH capacity of 3,004 students, a 2019/2020 peak enrollment of 2,576 students, and a projected 2024/2025 enrollment of 2,173 students (72% capacity). Q According to the Collier County 2020 AUIR, there is a projected 5-year surplus of 43.76 a. community park acres and 187.42 regional park acres. Per the 2020 AUIR, a population increase 0 of 1,725 people necessitates an additional 2.07 community park acres (a loss of 0.0012 acres per c person) and 4.66 regional park acres (a loss of 0.0027 acres per person). There is a sufficient c surplus of community park acreage to serve the proposed development. An EMS/Fire Station is located at 4590 Santa Barbara Blvd., approximately 5.60 miles north of the property. The subject property is within the Greater Naples Fire Rescue District. The proposed subdistrict does not create any significant and adverse impacts to the area roadway network. Please see the attached Traffic Analysis for further details. H:\2019\2019076\WP\GMPA\2nd Resubmittal\Exhibit V.E.1 - Public Facilities Report (5-13-2021).docx Packet Pg. 421 9.C.3 TPODUCOCH planOno- eneineerine a a 2 0 Traffic Impact Statement Collier Boulevard Lord's Way Growth Management Plan Amendment (GMPA) Planned Unit Development Amendment (PUDA) Prepared for: Hole Montes, Inc. 950 Encore Way, Naples, FL 34110 Phone: 239-254-2000 Collier County, Florida 2/11/2021 Prepared by: Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA 2800 Davis Boulevard, Suite 200 Naples, FL 34104 Phone: 239-566-9551 Email: ntrebilcock@trebilcock.biz Collier County Transportation Methodology Fee* — $500.00 Fee Collier County Transportation Review Fee* — Small Scale Study — No Fee Note — *to be collected at time of first submittal LO 0 0 N Packet Pg. 422 9.C.3 Collier Boulevard Lord's Way - GMPA/PUDA - TIS - February 2021 Statement of Certification I certify that this Traffic Impact Statement has been prepared by me or under my immediate supervision and that I have experience and training in the field of Traffic and Transportation Engineering. This item has been electronically signed and sealed by Norman J. Trebilcock, P.E., State of Florida license 47116, using a SHA-1 authentication code. Printed copies of this document are not considered signed and sealed, and the SHA-1 authentication code must be verified on any electronic copies. .` �. cErvs• . o .� :�0Q' No 47116 P% STATE OF :�4U 4 O R Digitally signed by Norman Trebilcock DN: c=US, st=Florida,[=Naples, o=Norman Trebilcock, cn=Norman Trebilcock, email=ntrebilcock@trebilcock.biz Date: 2021.02.11 13:04:29-05'00' Norman J. Trebilcock, AICP, PTOE, PE FL Registration No. 47116 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA 2800 Davis Boulevard, Suite 200 Naples, FL 34104 Company Cert. of Auth. No. 27796 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page 12 Packet Pg. 423 9.C.3 Collier Boulevard Lord's Way — GMPA/PUDA — TIS — February 2021 Table of Contents ProjectDescription.......................................................................................................................................4 TripGeneration............................................................................................................................................. 6 SiteAccess Analysis....................................................................................................................................... 8 ImprovementAnalysis.................................................................................................................................. 8 Mitigationof Impact.....................................................................................................................................9 Appendices Appendix A Project Conceptual Site Plan..................................................................................................10 Appendix B Initial Meeting Checklist (Methodology Meeting).................................................................. 12 Appendix C ITE Trip Generation Calculations............................................................................................18 E E Q a 0 LO 0 co 0 N Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 3 Packet Pg. 424 9.C.3 Collier Boulevard Lord's Way — GMPA/PUDA — TIS — February 2021 Project Description The Collier Boulevard Lord's Way project (formerly known as First Assembly Ministries Education & Rehabilitation Campus) is located in the northeast quadrant of the Collier Boulevard (CR 951) and The Lords Way intersection and lies within Section 14, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, in Collier County, Florida. The subject property is approximately 79.1 acres in size. Refer to Figure 1— Project Location Map and Appendix A: Project Conceptual Site Plan. W l■ r Pg I' t 6 ` N L J � � !i. L e l y s °j'n st Andrews : t Figure 1— Project Location Map SOUTH NAPLES Rattlesnake Hammock Rd T � ------------- Naples Lakes v Country Club f Rattlesnake Hammock Rd 0 6 %;'4,000 M JP N — NTS Pfof eCt 1. O •�//i!!II 2 � � • cThe Lords Wa 0 Go gle Currently, the subject parcel is partially developed. The subject development was previously approved with a zoning classification of Mixed Use Planned Unit Development (MPUD) to allow multi -family units, community facilities and church related uses in accordance with Collier County Ordinance #08-41. The purpose of this report is to document the transportation impacts associated with the proposed Growth Management Plan Amendment (GMPA) and Planned Unit Development Amendment (PUDA). The proposed amendment requests to allow up to 690 multi -family dwelling units. In addition, the amendment proposes to retain the traffic generation potential as currently allowed by zoning. In order to provide more flexibility, the development will have the ability to adjust proposed parameters by converting residential units to senior housing units, provided the established trip cap is not exceeded. This traffic report is in agreement with the latest adopted Collier County Traffic Impact Study Guidelines and Procedures. C a� E Q a 0 tO 0 co 0 N Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 14 Packet Pg. 425 9.C.3 Collier Boulevard Lord's Way — GMPA/PUDA — TIS — February 2021 The project provides the highest and best use scenario with respect to the project's proposed trip generation. Consistent with the recommendations illustrated in Collier County Traffic Impact Study Guidelines and Procedures, traffic generation associated with the proposed development is evaluated based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition and ITE Trip Generation Handbook, 3rd Edition. In agreement with ITE Land Use Code (LUC) descriptions, the ITE land use designations are illustrated in Table 1. Table 1 Development Program — ITE Land Use Designation Land Use - [SIC Code in Brackets]T_ ITE Land Use Code Size Approved Development Parameters Multiple -Family Dwellings - [N/A]1 220 — Multifamily Housing (Low -Rise) 306 dwelling units Residential Care Units - [8361] 254 —Assisted Living 249 beds Private Elementary and Secondary Schools - [8211, 8221] 536 — Private School (K-12) 300 students Church and Chapel - [8661] 560 — Church 2,400 seats Child Daycare Services - [8351] 565 — Day Care Center 300 students Proposed Development Parameters Multiple -Family Dwellings - [N/A]1,2 220 — Multifamily Housing (Low -Rise) 690 dwelling units Senior Housing Facilities - [N/A]',' 254 — Assisted Living3 varies Note(s): 1) N/A= Not applicable 2) The development will have the ability to convert residential units to senior housing units subject to size and trip cap limitations as applicable. 3) ITE LUC 254 — Assisted Living is used as the highest and best use. Other related land uses may be used subject to size and trip cap limitations as applicable. An initial methodology meeting was held with the Collier County Transportation Planning staff on September 24, 2020, via email. A revised methodology was provided on January 25, 2021 to reflect adjusted development intensity. Refer to Appendix B: Initial Meeting Checklist (Methodology Meeting). Proposed access points to the surrounding roadway network are depicted in the Conceptual Site Plan (as referenced in Appendix A). Currently the subject site provides connections on The Lords Way as follows: a right -out only connection at the western access and 2 unrestricted connections at the middle and eastern accesses. The amendment proposes to allow a right-in/right-out connection at the western access on The Lords Way. A detailed evaluation of applicable access points — turn lane requirements will be performed at the time of site development permitting/platting when more specific development parameters will be made available. c a� c a� E Q a U LO 0 co 0 N Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 15 Packet Pg. 426 9.C.3 Collier Boulevard Lord's Way — GMPA/PUDA — TIS — February 2021 Trip Generation The software program OTISS (Online Traffic Impact Study Software), most current version is used to evaluate the projected trip generation for the project. The ITE equations and/or rates are used for the trip generation calculations, as applicable. The ITE — OTISS trip generation calculation worksheets are provided in Appendix C: ITE Trip Generation Calculations. The internal capture accounts for a reduction in external traffic because of the interaction between the multiple land uses in a site. Based on the recommendations illustrated in the ITE Trip Generation Manual and Collier County Traffic Impact Study Guidelines and Procedures, no reductions for internal capture traffic are considered for this project. The pass -by trips account for traffic that is already on the external roadway network and stops at the project on the way to a primary trip destination. In accordance with Collier County and ITE guidelines, no pass -by reductions are recommended for the analyzed land uses. Residential Multi — Family component — The ITE Trip Generation Manual provides three unique land use codes that describe Multifamily Housing. Based on the number of levels (floors) provided, these are illustrated as follow: LUC 220— Multifamily Housing (Low -Rise), LUC 221— Multifamily Housing (Mid -Rise) and LUC 222 — Multifamily Housing (High -Rise). Based on the trip generation data illustrated for these specific uses in the ITE Trip Generation Manual, the LUC 220 — Multifamily Housing (Low -Rise) represents a conservative estimate (highest traffic generator) and it is utilized for the purposes of this report. Residential Care Facilities component —A trip generation comparison for weekday PM Peak Hour average rate associated with ITE variable "beds" is provided in Appendix C for the ITE LUC 254 — Assisted Living and ITE LUC 620 — Nursing Home. Based on the results, the ITE LUC 254 — Assisted Living represents the higher traffic generator and it is utilized for the purposes of this report. The estimated trip generation associated with the approved development parameters is illustrated in Table 2A. The traffic evaluation for the proposed GMPA/PUDA development conditions is summarized in Table 2B. Table 2A Trip Generation — Approved Development — Average Weekday Development Daily Volume AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour ITE Land Use Size' Enter Exit Total Enter Exit Total Multifamily Housing (Low -Rise) 306 du 2,272 32 106 138 101 59 160 Assisted Living 249 beds 647 30 17 47 25 40 65 Private School (K-12) 300 students 744 146 94 240 22 29 51 Church 2,400 seats 1,056 12 12 24 29 43 72 Day Care Center 300 students 1,227 124 110 234 111 126 237 Traffic 5,946 344 339 j 683 288 1 297 1 585 Note(s): 1) du = dwelling units. C a� Q a 0 LO 0 co 0 F4 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 6 Packet Pg. 427 9.C.3 Collier Boulevard Lord's Way — GMPA/PUDA — TIS — February 2021 Table 2B Trip Generation — Proposed GMPA/PUDA Build -out Conditions —Average Weekday Daily Development Two -Way AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Volume ITE Land Use Size' Enter Exit Total Enter Exit Total Multifamily Housing (Low -Rise)' 690 du 5 176 ' 69 230 299 208 122 330 Note(s): 1) du = dwelling units. 2) The development will have the ability to adjust proposed parameters by converting multi -family residential dwelling units to senior housing units, as applicable. In agreement with the Collier CountyTraffic Impact Study (TIS) guidelines, significantly impacted roadways are identified based on the proposed project highest peak hour trip generation (net external traffic) and consistent with the peak hour of the adjacent street traffic. Based on the information contained in Collier County Annual Update and Inventory Report (AUIR), the peak hour for adjacent roadway network is PM. For the purpose of this TIS, projected traffic impact is analyzed based on the PM peak hour net new traffic generated by the proposed GMPA/PUDA project as illustrated in Table 3. Table 3 represents the difference between Table 2A and Table 2B (traffic impacts associated with the proposed conditions versus the approved development parameters). Table 3 Trip Generation — Projected Net New Traffic — Average Weekday Development PM Peak Hour' Enter Exit Total Current Approved Development 288 297 585 Proposed Development GMPA/PUDA 208 122 330 Net New Traffic Increase/(Decrease) (80) (175) (255) Note(s): 1) Refer to Table 2A and Table 26. As illustrated in Table 3, projected traffic impacts associated with the proposed GMPA/PUDA development scenario do not exceed the traffic impacts allowed under current zoning conditions. The estimated trips at project buildout condition as allowed by current zoning approval is 585 PM peak hour two-way trips. Based on the trip generation results illustrated in Table 3, from a traffic stand point, the proposed GMPA/PUDA development scenario is less intensive when compared to the maximum allowed under current zoning conditions. C a� c a� E Q a 0 LO 0 co 0 F4 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 7 Packet Pg. 428 9.C.3 Collier Boulevard Lord's Way — GMPA/PUDA — TIS — February 2021 Site Access Analysis Proposed access points to the surrounding roadway network are depicted in the Conceptual Site Plan (as referenced in Appendix A). Currently the subject site provides connections on The Lords Way as follows: a right -out only connection at the western access and 2 unrestricted connections at the middle and eastern accesses. The amendment proposes to allow a right-in/right-out connection at the western access on The Lords Way. The Lords Way is 2-lane undivided roadway with a posted legal speed of 35 mph in the vicinity of project. Collier County's roadway network is comprised of State, County, City and privately maintained roadways. Roadways are generally classified as Arterial, Collector, or Local. Forthe purposes of this report, The Lords Way is classified as a public local road. Access management is the design of access between roadways and land development. It promotes the efficient and safe movement of people and goods by reducing conflicts on the roadway system. The latest adopted Access Management Policy for Collier County is depicted in Resolution No. 13-257, as amended. As illustrated in the Collier County Transportation Planning Development Guidebook, local roads are typically classified as Access Class 7. Consistent with a Class 7 designation, the established access management criteria are as follow: 125 feet connection spacing; 330 feet directional median opening; 440 feet full median opening; and 1,320 feet (0.25 mi) signal spacing. In addition, the minimum corner clearance at intersections are presented as follow: Right -in only access — 75 feet (access position — approaching intersection), and Right -in/ Right -out access — 115 feet (access position — approaching intersection). Based on existing geometric configuration, the project's western driveway is approximately 1,160 feet from the intersection to the west (Collier Boulevard and The Lords Way intersection) and approximately 200 feet from the driveway to the east. As such, the proposed option as a right-in/right-out connection is in compliance with Collier County Access Management Policy and is appropriate for this location. Improvement Analysis Based on the results illustrated in this report, from a traffic stand point, the proposed development scenario is less intensive when compared to what is allowed under current zoning conditions. The maximum total daily trip generation for the proposed development shall not exceed 585 two-way PM peak hour new trips based on the land use codes in the ITE Trip Generation Manual in effect at the time of application for SDP/SDPA or subdivision plat approval. In order to provide more flexibility, the development will have the ability to adjust proposed parameters by converting multi -family residential dwelling units to senior housing units, as applicable. The proposed right-in/right-out connection at the western access is in compliance with Collier County Access Management Policy and should be allowed at this location. C a� E Q a 0 LO 0 co 0 N Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 8 Packet Pg. 429 9.C.3 Collier Boulevard Lord's Way — GMPA/PUDA — TIS — February 2021 A detailed evaluation of applicable access points —turn lane requirements will be performed at the time c a� of site development permitting/platting when more specific development parameters will be made E available. c a� E a. Mitigation of Impact The developer proposes to pay the appropriate Collier County Road Impact Fee as building permits are c issued for the project, as applicable. N Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 19 Packet Pg. 430 9.C.3 Collier Boulevard Lord's Way - GMPA/PUDA - TIS - February 2021 Appendix A Project Conceptual Site Plan C d C E Q d LO 0 w 0 N Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page 110 Packet Pg. 431 9.C.3 Collier Boulevard Lord's Way — GMPA/PUDA — TIS — February 2021 r 3z O ) F Oj s3NVl VON310VH xmt ONINOZ ) w W um � W w m= aw¢m 0 j O Z Q Q ¢w= 'L'lOwD DDW VO Npmm ZG OZ V �Z Z } -� ¢ V)23Z p �� (n a. m J J ~ W W F5 X O¢ wMw U Q LLZ ! J x Q Q _ _ m _ ZL J w V) O w J Z J Y Z)VUJL z �J W x I o<w w ', - ¢ oW o ' oU,Q U,X= VW,WI Q 0 a WN pW ZWZm0¢7¢7¢ � WO ^ �. d' ^, O? U W op J a w O z J O �z m Z -coo Z Z 0 0 0 Zw 3 pz Z JZ P)-"� N a w JV) \ m0 S m0 Wp5 S w Q Q..Q \ G dQ W Up U w ZQ N W U O W NwU) W J O ¢ 0. _.. _ ... -- - Q ¢N z —wt, a w ^ 3 o Vid-L Q — o ¢ ri '...� T O W M O N m N 0 ~V crnanNn O f W N m O 0 N N GGC W LI LJ U K U O Z <** on Nno O*i m LLW w67r7NO� nV� <0 m S Q ? ¢ W ¢ N j Q m U D 41 l�. o W V) ^ J U V) K (Wn 0 U U U UFVr Q32O w W OZ NW � V J Ozjw '.Z ONW ZOE w Qm ,o dUZ Z=FJ>Z z¢a= w 0 aN a Z O 2- N �nx S�z wow J z O SoQ -ZW O JI O?iW oJ� WOw ~ m •, wzm w ¢� w 30 zwWN .J J 0 ~ OU w< 1�. ` W �>w 0� Z U0}} Q z ¢w¢J <w w Q �o wwwQa3f Q ~� 11 m_ z r v r U �� pwC, x (Ax 2=) a Z Vlm LL HZ0 4. ¢mUp Wli U' O N iio F' 0 _U' �N 3Wn o¢ ~ j J p UUUUUUU mo JZ oaF w00 S ow Q z ¢¢¢¢¢¢¢ ; V Naa zw 2� \a � Zw F p w � p U_ 0 Q Oft fF N^ Xw W U >COW h V) No �[uu e$iF Op3. Q x4g ZN¢ 5 cc WWI. W0 is, T z $ -- - - - - - --OKw2^ _ - I ' )w..cWno F I ,V_ W Oin Ka fnz� w)n ~ 7 ¢ ZN QZ Z1 Op UpN aw c IS6• I'D Z0 c s 0w . . Z 0 ZOO Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 11 Packet Pg. 432 9.C.3 Collier Boulevard Lord's Way — GMPA/PUDA — TIS — February 2021 Appendix B Initial Meeting Checklist (Methodology Meeting) C d C Q 2 U' LO 0 w 0 N Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 12 Packet Pg. 433 9.C.3 Collier Boulevard Lord's Way — GMPA/PUDA — TIS — February 2021 INITIAL MEETING CHECKLIST Suggestion: Use this Appendix as a worksheet to ensure that no important elements are overlooked. Cross out the items that do not apply, or N/A (not applicable). Date: Member 24, 2020: Revised: January 25, 2021 Time: N/A Location: N/A — Via Email People Attending: Name, Organization, and Telephone Numbers 1) Michael Sawyer, Collier County Growth Management Department 2) Norman Trebilcock, TCS 3) CCi rian Malaescu. TCS 4) David Dratnol, TCS Study Preparer• Preparer's Name and Title: Norman Trebilcock. AICP, PE Organization: Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Address & Telephone Number: 2800 Davis Boulevard, Suite 200, Naples, FL 34104: ph 239-566- 9551 Reviewer(s)• Reviewer's Name & Title: Michael Sawyer Organization: Collier County Transportation Planning Section Address & Telephone Number: 2685 Horseshoe Drive S. Suite 103, Naples, FL 34104: 239-252- 2926 Applicant: Applicant's Name: Hole Montes, Inc Address: 950 Encore Way, Naples, FL 34110 Telephone Number: 239-254-2000 Proposed Development: Name: Collier Boulevard Lords Way MPUD (fka The First Assembly Ministries Education and Rehabilitation Campus MPUD) — GMP/MPUD Amendment Location: north of The Lords Way and east of Collier Boulevard, Naples, FL,. (refer to Fieure 1). Land Use Type: Residential ITE Code #: ITE LUC 220 Description: The proposed amendment will allow the development to construct a maximum of 690 multi -family dwelling units. In addition, the development will allow assisted living units by conversion from the residential use, provided the established trip can is not exceeded. The proposed amendment will retain the maximum traffic cap as allowed by current zoning_ No changes to the existing approved accesses are proposed with the exception of the most western connection which is proposed to allow a right-in/right out connection as an option. Page 1 of 5 C O C d Q an 0 to 0 to r.+ C N E 3 U O G tZ R Y «s m V IL V V .r Q Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page 113 Packet Pg. 434 9.C.3 Collier Boulevard Lord's Way — GMPA/PUDA — TIS — February 2021 Zoning Existing: The First Assembly Ministries Education and Rehabilitation Campus MPUD, CC Ord. 08-41. Comprehensive plan recommendation: GMP Amendment to allow proposed uses Requested: Amendment approval for new development scenario. Figure I — Project Location Map D a � � Prgeot g L ? C Na0lesYakes-'�"••rr•.` Country Clu6� ..e..... • SOU7`n NAPLES RNNemdeNmmod PE Pn�leanare Nxnmwl Pd A n Lely M �ro s• noa..n � � i t , NGoogle • ' , Findings of the Preliminary Study: Trin Generation— Conservativelv. internal capture and pass-bv rates are not considered Study type: This Traffic Impact Statement will demonstrate that there are no estimated net new trips above what was previously approved. No concurrence and operational analyses are presented as part of this amendment. Site Access — The most western access is proposed to allow a right -out only or right-in/right-out connection. Report will present an access management analysis based on the latest adopted Collier County Access Management Policy. As projected net new traffic is below 50 two-way AM -PM peak hour trips, this study qualifies for a Small Scale TIS — no significant roadway impacts within the county ROW. Study Tyne: (if not net increase, operational study) ® Small Scale TIS ❑ Minor TIS ❑ Major TIS Page 2 of 5 C d C E Q tL 2 0 LO 0 w 0 N Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 14 Packet Pg. 435 9.C.3 Collier Boulevard Lord's Way — GMPA/PUDA — TIS — February 2021 Study Area: Boundaries: North of The Lords Way and east of Collier Blvd. Additional intersections to be analyzed: N/A Build Out Year: 2026; Planning Horizon Year: 2026 Analysis Time Period(s): Daily, AM -PM Pk Hr — Trip Generation; PM Pk Hr — MPUD Trip Can Future Off -Site Developments: N/A Source of Trip Generation Rates: ITE Trip Generation Manual, 10 h Edition. ITE Trip Generation Handbook 3' Edition Reductions In Tipp Generation Rates: None: N/A Pass -by trips: Per ITE and Collier County guidelines. Internal trips: Per ITE and Collier County guidelines. Transit use: N/A Other: N/A Horizon Year Roadway Network Improvements: 2026 Methodoloay & Assumptions: Non -site traffic estimates: Collier County traffic counts and 2020 AUIR Site -trip generation: OTISS — ITE W Edition Trip distribution method: N/A Traffic assignment method: N/A Traffic growth rate: N/A Turning movements: N/A Special Features: from preliminary study or prior experience) Accidents locations: N/A Sight distance: N/A Queuing: N/A Access location & configuration: N/A Traffic control: MUTCD Signal system location & progression needs: N/A On -site parking needs: N/A Data Sources: CC 2020 AUIR: CC Traffic Counts Base maps: N/A Prior study reports: N/A Access policy and jurisdiction: N/A Review process: N/A Requirements: N/A Miscellaneous: N/A Page 3 of 5 C uv E C uv E Q a .r Q Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page 115 Packet Pg. 436 9.C.3 Collier Boulevard Lord's Way — GMPA/PUDA — TIS — February 2021 Small Scale Study — No Fee Y Minor Study - $750.00 Major Study - $1,500.00 Methodology Fee $500 X Includes 0 intersections Additional Intersections - $500.00 each AU fees rill be agreed to during the Methodology meeting and nmst be paint to Transportation prior to our sign - off on the application. SIGNATURES Normaw TY&Uopolz Study Preparer—Nornian Trebileock Reviewer(s) Applicant Page 4 of 5 C d E C E Q d LO 0 w 0 F4 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 16 Packet Pg. 437 9.C.3 Collier Boulevard Lord's Way — GMPA/PUDA — TIS — February 2021 Collier County Traffic Impact Study Review Fee Schedule Fees will be paid incrementally as the development proceeds: Methodology Review, Analysis Review, and Sufficiency Reviews. Fees for additional meetings or other optional services are also provided below. Methodology Review - $500 Fee Methodology Review includes review of a submitted methodology statement, including review of submitted trip generation estimate(s), distribution, assignment, and review of a "Small Scale Study" determination, written approval/comments on a proposed methodology statement, and written confirmation of a re -submitted, amended methodology statement, and one meeting in Collier County, if needed. "Small Scale Study" Review - No Additional Fee (Includes one sufficiency review) Upon approval of the methodology review, the applicant may submit the study. The review includes: a concurrency determination, site access inspection and confirmation of the study compliance with trip generation, distribution and maximum threshold compliance. "Minor Study Review" - $750 Fee ancludes one sufficiency review) Review of the submitted traffic analysis includes: optional field visit to site, confirmation of trip generation, distribution, and assignment, concurrency determination, confirmation of committed improvements, review of traffic volume data collected/assembled, review of off -site improvements within the right-of-way, review of site access and circulation, and preparation and review of "sufficiency" comments/questions. "Maior Study Review" - $1,500 Fee (Includes two intersection analysis and two sufficiency reviews) Review of the submitted traffic analysis includes: field visit to site, confirmation of trip generation, special trip generation and/or trip length study, distribution and assignment, concurrency determination, confirmation of committed improvements, review of traffic volume data collected/assembled, review of traffic growth analysis, review of off -site roadway operations and capacity analysis, review of site access and circulation, neighborhood traffic intrusion issues, any necessary improvement proposals and associated cost estimates, and preparation and review of up to two rounds of"sufficiency" comments/questions and/or recommended conditions of approval. "Additional intersection Review" - $500 Fee The review of additional intersections shall include the same parameters as outlined in the "Major Study Review" and shall apply to each intersection above the first two intersections included in the "Major Study Review" "Additional Sufficiency Reviews" - $500 Fee Additional sufficiency reviews beyond those initially included in the appropriate study shall require the additional Fee prior to the completion of the review. page 5 of 5 C O E C d E Q a Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page 117 Packet Pg. 438 9.C.3 Collier Boulevard Lord's Way - GMPA/PUDA - TIS - February 2021 Appendix C ITE Trip Generation Calculations C d C Q LO 0 w 0 N Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a„e is Packet Pg. 439 9.C.3 Collier Boulevard Lord's Way — GMPA/PUDA — TIS — February 2021 ITE Land Use Descriptions Land Use: 220 Multifamily Housing (Low -Rise) Description Low-rise multifamily housing includes apartments, townhouses, and condominiums located within the same building with at least three other dwelling units and that have one or two levels (floors). Multifamily housing (mid -rise) (Land Use 221), multifamily housing (high-rise) (Land Use 222), and off -campus student apartment (Land Use 225) are related land uses. Additional Data In prior editions of Trip Generation Manual, the low-rise multifamily housing sites were further divided into rental and condominium categories. An investigation of vehicle trip data found no clear differences in trip making patterns between the rental and condominium sites within the ITE database. As more data are compiled for future editions, this land use classification can be reinvestigated. For the three sites for which both the number of residents and the number of occupied dwelling units were available, there were an average of 2.72 residents per occupied dwelling unit. For the two sites for which the numbers of both total dwelling units and occupied dwelling units were available, an average of 96.2 percent of the total dwelling units were occupied. This land use included data from a wide variety of units with different sizes, price ranges, locations, and ages. Consequently, there was a wide variation in trips generated within this category. Other factors, such as geographic location and type of adjacent and nearby development, may also have had an effect on the site trip generation. Time -of -day distribution data for this land use are presented in Appendix A. For the 10 general urban/suburban sites with data, the overall highest vehicle volumes during the AM and PM on a weekday were counted between 7:15 and 8:15 a.m. and 4:45 and 5:45 p.m., respectively. For the one site with Saturday data, the overall highest vehicle volume was counted between 9:45 and 10:45 a.m. For the one site with Sunday data, the overall highest vehicle volume was counted between 11:45 a.m. and 12:45 p.m. For the one dense multi -use urban site with 24-hour count data, the overall highest vehicle volumes during the AM and PM on a weekday were counted between 7:00 and 8:00 a.m. and 6:15 and 7:15 p.m., respectively. For the three sites for which data were provided for both occupied dwelling units and residents, there was an average of 2.72 residents per occupied dwelling unit. The average numbers of person trips per vehicle trip at the five general urban/suburban sites at which both person trip and vehicle trip data were collected were as follows: • 1.13 during Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, one hour between 7 and 9 a.m. • 1.21 during Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, one hour between 4 and 6 p.m. " Trip Generation Manual 10th Edition • Volume 2: Data - Residential (Land Uses 200-299) 29 C a� c a� E Q 12 0 LO 0 0 N Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page 119 Packet Pg. 440 9.C.3 Collier Boulevard Lord's Way - GMPA/PUDA - TIS - February 2021 The sites were surveyed in the 1980s, the 1990s, the 2000s, and the 2010s in British Columbia (CAN), California, District of Columbia, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, Maine, Maryland, Minnesota, New Jersey, New York, Ontario, Oregon, Pennsylvania, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Virginia, and Washington. It is expected that the number of bedrooms and number of residents are likely correlated to the number of trips generated by a residential site. Many of the studies included in this land use did not indicate the total number of bedrooms. To assist in the future analysis of this land use, it is important that this information be collected and included in trip generation data submissions. Source Numbers 168, 187, 188, 204, 211, 300, 305, 306, 319, 320, 321, 357, 390, 412, 418, 525, 530, 571, 579, 583, 864, 868, 869, 870, 896, 903, 918, 946, 947, 948, 951 30 Trip Generation Manual 10th Edition • Volume 2: Data • Residential (Land Uses 200-299) C d C E Q d 2 0 u7 0 co 0 CN Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page 120 Packet Pg. 441 9.C.3 Collier Boulevard Lord's Way — GMPA/PUDA — TIS — February 2021 Land Use: 254 Assisted Living Description An assisted living complex is a residential setting that provides either routine general protective oversight or assistance with activities necessary for independent living to mentally or physically limited persons. It commonly has separate living quarters for residents. Its services typically include dining, housekeeping, social and physical activities, medication administration, and transportation. Alzheimer's and ALS care are commonly offered by these facilities, though the living quarters for these patients may be located separately from the other residents. Assisted care commonly bridges the gap between independent living and nursing homes. In some areas of the country, assisted living residences may be called personal care, residential care, or domiciliary care. Staff may be available at an assisted care facility 24 hours a day, but skilled medical care —which is limited in nature —is not required. Congregate care facility (Land Use 253), continuing care retirement community (Land Use 255), and nursing home (Land Use 620) are related uses. Additional Data The rooms in these facilities may be private or shared accommodations, consisting of either a single room or a small apartment -style unit with a kitchenette and living space. Time -of -day distribution data for this land use are presented in Appendix A. For the four general urban/suburban sites with data, the overall highest vehicle volumes during the AM and PM on a weekday were counted between 11:30 a.m. and 12:30 p.m. and 12:30 and 1:30 p.m., respectively. The sites were surveyed in the 1980s, the 1990s, the 2000s, and the 2010s in New Jersey, New York, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, and Texas. Source Numbers 244, 573, 581, 611, 725, 876, 877, 912 Trip Generation Manual 10th Edition • Volume 2: Data • Residential (Land Uses 200-299) 387 C d C E Q a 2 0 LO 0 co 0 N Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 21 Packet Pg. 442 9.C.3 Collier Boulevard Lord's Way — GMPA/PUDA — TIS — February 2021 Land Use: 536 Private School (K-12) Description A private school (K-12) primarily serves students attending kindergarten through the 12th grade but may also include those beginning with pre—K classes. These schools may also offer extended care and day care. Students may travel a long distance to get to private schools. Elementary school (Land Use 520), middle school/junior high school (Land Use 522), high school (Land Use 530), private school (K-8) (Land Use 534), and charter elementary school (Land Use 537) are related uses. Additional Data Some of the schools included in this land use provided bus service. One study reported that carpooling was used instead of bus service. At least one study indicated that no public bus service was provided to the school. The sites were surveyed in the 1980s, the 1990s, and the 2000s in Delaware, Florida, Maryland, Montana, Oregon, and Washington. Source Numbers 283, 355, 370, 536, 571, 613 ITE Trip Generation Manual 10'h Edition • Volume 2: Data • Updated October 24, 2017 C d C Q 2 0 LO 0 0 N Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page 1 22 Packet Pg. 443 9.C.3 Collier Boulevard Lord's Way — GMPA/PUDA — TIS — February 2021 Land Use: 560 Church Description A church is a building in which public worship services are held. A church houses an assembly hall or sanctuary; it may also house meeting rooms, classrooms, and, occasionally, dining, catering, or party facilities. Synagogue (Land Use 561) and mosque (Land Use 562) are related uses. Additional Data Worship services are typically held on Sundays. Some of the surveyed churches offered day care or extended care programs during the week. The peak hours for the sites have a direct relation to the schedule for church services. For the sites with time -of -day data, the Sunday peak hours included the 60-minute periods beginning with 8:45 a.m., 9:00 a.m., 10:45 a.m., and 5:00 p.m. The sites were surveyed in the 1980s, the 1990s, the 2000s, and the 2010s in Alberta (CAN), California, Colorado, Florida, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Texas, and Virginia. Source Numbers 169, 170, 423, 428, 436, 554, 571, 583, 629, 631, 704, 903, 904, 957, 971, 981 178 Trip Generation Manual 10th Edition • Volume 2: Data • Institutional (Land Uses 500-599) 7 C d C Q 2 0 LO 0 0 N Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page 123 Packet Pg. 444 9.C.3 Collier Boulevard Lord's Way — GMPA/PUDA — TIS — February 2021 Land Use: 565 Day Care Center Description A day care center is a facility where care for pre-school age children is provided, normally during the daytime hours. Day care facilities generally include classrooms, offices, eating areas and playgrounds. Some centers also provide after -school care for school -age children. Additional Data Time -of -day distribution data for this land use are presented in Appendix A. For the 21 general urban/ suburban sites with data, the overall highest vehicle volumes during the AM and PM on a weekday were counted between 7:15 and 8:15 a.m. and 4:45 and 5:45 p.m., respectively. The sites were surveyed in the 1980s, the 1990s, the 2000s, and the 2010s in California, Florida, Georgia, Maryland, Minnesota, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, and Wisconsin. Source Numbers 169, 208, 216, 253, 335, 336, 337, 355, 418, 423, 536, 550, 562, 583, 633, 734, 866, 869, 877, 878, 954, 959, 981 224 Trip Generation Manual 10th Edition • Volume 2: Data • Institutional (Land Uses 500-599) C d C E Q 12 2 0 LO 0 co 0 N Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page 124 Packet Pg. 445 9.C.3 Collier Boulevard Lord's Way — GMPA/PUDA — TIS — February 2021 ITE Trip Generation Comparison — LUC 254 Assisted Living vs LUC 620 Nursing Home Assisted Living (254) Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Beds On a: Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m. Settingli-ocation: General UrbanlSuburban Number of Studies: 9 Avg. Num. of Beds: 123 Directional Distribution: 38% entering, 62% exiting Vehicle Trip Generation per Bed venige a Range of Reba Standard Deviation 0.28 1 0.11 - 0.53 0.13 Data Plot and Equation x 60 W x n 40 x i= x xx x 20 x x °0 so 100 1S0 200 X= Number of Beds x Study Site Average Rate Fitted Curve Equation: Not Given R%-- TdpGen Manual, 10thEdition • Institute of Transportation Engineers Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 25 Packet Pg. 446 9.C.3 Collier Boulevard Lord's Way — GMPA/PUDA — TIS — February 2021 Nursing Home (620) Vehicle Trip Ends vs: Beds On a: Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m. Setting/Location: General Urban/Suburban Number of Studies: 3 Avg. Num. of Beds: 100 Directional Distribution: 33% entering, 67% exiting Vehicle Trip Generation per Bed Average Rate Range of Rays Standard Deviation 0.22 0.12 - 0.27 0.07 Data Plot and Equation Caution —Small Sample Size as x 30 x pN 2 W Q p F 10 x 00 50 100 150 200 X = Number of Beds X Study Site Average Rate Fitted Curve Equation: Not Given R-- r p Gen Manual, 10th Edition a Institute of Transportation Engineers Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 26 Packet Pg. 447 9.C.3 Collier Boulevard Lord's Way — GMPA/PUDA — TIS — February 2021 ITE Trip Generation Project — Approved Conditions per CC Ordinance 08-41 Project Information Project Name: Collier Blvd Lords Way PUD - Approved No: Date: 9/29/2020 Edition: Trip Gen Manual, loth Ed Land Use Size Daily AM Peak PM Peak Entry Exit Entry Exit Entry Exit 220 - Multifamily Housing (Low -Rise) (General Urban/suburban) 306 Dwelling Units 1136 1136 32 106 101 59 Reduction 0 0 0 0 0 0 Internal 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass -by 0 0 0 0 0 0 Non -pass -by 1136 1136 32 106 101 59 254 - Assisted Living (General Urban/Suburban) 249 Beds 324 323 30 17 25 40 Reduction 0 0 0 0 0 0 Internal 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass -by 0 0 0 0 0 0 Non -pass -by 324 323 30 17 25 40 536 - Private School (K-12) (General Urban/Suburban) 300Students 372 372 146 94 22 29 Reduction 0 0 0 0 0 0 Internal 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass -by 0 0 0 0 0 0 Non -pass -by 372 372 146 94 22 29 560-church (General Urban/Suburban) 2400 Seats 528 528 12 12 29 43 Reduction 0 0 0 0 0 0 Internal 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass -by 0 0 0 0 0 0 Non -pass -by 528 528 12 12 29 43 565 - Day Care Center (General Urban/Suburban) 300 Students 614 613 124 110 111 126 Reduction 0 0 0 0 0 0 Internal 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass -by 0 0 0 0 0 0 Non -pass -by 614 613 124 110 111 126 Total 2974 2972 344 339 288 297 Total Reduction 0 0 0 0 0 0 Totallnternal 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Pass -by 0 0 0 0 0 0 -Total Non -pass -by 2974 2972 344 339 288 297 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page 1 27 Packet Pg. 448 9.C.3 Collier Boulevard Lord's Way — GMPA/PUDA — TIS — February 2021 PERIOD SETTING Analysis Name: Daily Project Name: Collier Blvd Lords Way PUD No: - Approved Date: 9/1 V2020 city: State/Province: Zip/Postal Code: Country: Client Name: Analyst's Name: Edition: Trip Gen Manual, 10th Ed Land Use Independent Size Time Period Method Entry Exit Total variable 220 - Multifamily Dwelling Units 306 Weekday Best Rt (LIN) 1136 1136 2272 Housing (Low -Rise) T = 7.56 (X)+-40.86 50% 50% (General Urban/Suburban) 254-Assisted Living Beds zai'"-' Weekday Average 3240) 3230) 6470) (General 2.6 50% 50% Urban/Suburban) 536 - Private School Students 30C'")' Weekday Average 3720U 3720) 74-40U (K-12) (General 2.48 50% 50% Urban/Suburban) 560 - Church (General Seats 2400(0) Weekday Average 5280) 5280) 1056(l) Urban/Suburban) 0.44 50% 50% 565 - Day Care Center Students 300(0) Weekday Average 614 613 1227 (General 4.09 50% 50% Urban/Suburban) (0) Indicates size out of range. (1) Indicates small sample size, use carefully. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 28 Packet Pg. 449 9.C.3 Collier Boulevard Lord's Way — GMPA/PODA — TIS — February 2021 PERIOD SETTING Analysis Name: AM Peak Hour Project Name: Collier Blvd Lords Way PU D No: - Approved Date: 9/14/2020 City: State/Province: Zip/Postal Code: Country,. Client Name: Analyst's Name: Edition: Trip Gen Manual, 10th Ed Land Use Independent Size Time Period Method Entry Exit Total Variable 220- Multifamly Dwelling Units 306 Weekday, Peak Best Fit (LOG) 32 106 138 Housing (Low -Rise) Hourof LnM = 0.95Ln(() 23% 77% (General Adjacent Street +-0.51 Urban/Suburban) Traffic, One Hour Between 7 and 9 a.m. 254- Assisted Living Beds q`'; Weekday, Peak Average 30 17 47 (General Hourof 0.19 64% 36% Urban/Suburban) Adja cent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 7 and 9 a.m. 536-Private School Students 300 Weekday, Peak Average 1460) 94(l) 2400) (K-12)(General Hourof 0.8 61% 39% Urban/Suburban) Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 7 and 9 a.m. 560 -Church (General Seats 2400(0) Weekday, Peak Average 120) 12(l) 24(') Urban/Suburban) Hourof 0.01 50% 50% Adja cent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 7 and 9 a.m. 565 - Day Care Center Students 300(0) Weekday, Peak Average 124 110 234 (General Hourof 0.78 53% 47% Urban/Suburban) Adja tent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 7 and 9 a.m. (0) Indicates size out of range. (1) indicates small sample size, use carefully. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 29 Packet Pg. 450 9.C.3 Collier Boulevard Lord's Way — GMPA/PUDA — TIS — February 2021 PERIOD S 1 I H l; Analysis Name: PM Peak Hour Project Name: Collier Blvd Lords Way PUD No: - Approved Date: 9/14/2020 City: State/Province: Zip/Postal Code: Country: Cl lent Name: Analysts Name: Edition: Land Use Independent Size Time Period Method Variable 220-Multifamily Dwelling Units 306 Weekday, Peak Best Rt(LOG) Housing (Low -Rise) Hour of Ln(T) = 0.89Lrg)Q (General Adjacent street +-0,02 Urban/Suburban) Traffic, One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m. 254-Assisted Living Beds a,;'=i Weekday, Peak Average (General Hourof 0.26 Urban/Suburban) Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m. 536 - Private School Students sn:;i0- Weekday, Peak Average (K-12) (General Hour of 0.17 Urban/Suburban) Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m. 560 - Church (General Seats <<i . 1'--'- Weekday, Peak Average Urban/Suburban) Hourof 0.03 Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m. 555 - Day Care Center Students _ - Weekday, Peak Average (General Hourof 0.79 Urban/Suburban) Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 4 and 6 p,m. (0) indicates size out of range. (1) Indicates small sample size, use carefully. Trip Gen Manual, loth Ed Entry Exit Total 101 59 160 63% 37% 25 40 65 38% 62% 220) 29(r) 51(r) 43% 57% 290) 430) 720) 40% 60% ill 126 237 47% 53% Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Page 130 Packet Pg. 451 9.C.3 Collier Boulevard Lord's Way - GMPA/PUDA - TIS - February 2021 ITE Trip Generation Project — Proposed MPUD Amendment PERIOD SETTING AM Peak PM Peak Entry Exit Entry Exit ')88 69 230 208 122 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 i88 69 230 208 122 i88 69 230 208 122 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 i88 69 230 208 122 ✓ DATA PROVIDED BY ITE Specify the Independent Variable, Time Period, and Calculation Method to be used In the calculation of the number of Trlps generated in the analysis. To record any notes, click Add Notes above. PROJKTNAME; COLLIER BLVD LORDS WAY PUD -PROPOSED ANALYSIS NAME; Dilly �� LAND U5F INDEPENDENT 517f LOCATION TIME PERIOD METHOD ENTRY EXIT TOTAL VARLASLF 220- Multifamily HouslrLg(LOvr DmIIIngUNts v 69p(M General Weekday Bes FFit(1 � U 2588 2588 5176 Rl9e) Urban/Suburban r T= 7.56M+-tQ86 (0) Indicates s" out of range. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 31 Packet Pg. 452 9.C.3 Collier Boulevard Lord's Way — GMPA/PUDA — TIS — February 2021 PERIOD SETTING ✓ DATA PROVIDED BYITE Specify the Independent Variable, Time Period, and Calculation Method to be used In the calculation of the number of Trips generated In the analysis. To record any notes, click Add Notes above. PROJECTNAME: COLLIER BLVD LORDS WAY POD -PROPOSED ANALYStSNAME: AMPeak Hour LANDUSE INDEPENDENT SIZE LoCAI1u;j ili.iF Pi NUD k9FTHO❑ - VARIABLE 220 Muhlfamly Housing (Low General (W Best Fh(LOG) Rise) uwllll Units690M Urban/Suburbanl Weekday, Peak Hot 69 230 (0) Indicates slze out of range. PERIOD SETTING 299 ✓ DATA PROVIDED BY ITE Specify the Independent Variable, Time Period, and Calculation Method to be used In the calculation of the number of Trips generated In the analysis. To record any notes, click Add Notes above. PROJECTNAME: COLLIER BLVD LORDS WAY POD -PROPOSED ANALYSIS NAME: PM Peak Hour I ANO USE INDEPENDENT SIZE I OCATION TIME PERIOD METHOD VARIARI F 220 - Multifamily Housing (Low- Owelling Unl[s 59pN1 General fWeekd� Peak Hot .. most Rt(LOG) `� 208 122 Rise) UrbanlSuburban Ln(q= 0.89Ln(x)+-0.02 (0) Imitates sin out of range. TOTAI 330 C E C d E Q o_ to O ILO CD rl Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA a g e -1,2 Packet Pg. 453 9.C.3 Norman J. Trebilcock, AICP, PTOE, PE President, Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Mr. Trebilcock directs plan production, design development & permitting efforts on public works and private sector projects. With over 30 years of professional experience, he specializes in transportation engineering, including highway design, utility relocation, drainage design, street lighting, signalization, access management and permitting projects. He prepares and reviews traffic impact statements and related reports, and he has been certified by the Florida Department of Transportation in several transportation areas. Mr. Trebilcock manages team members and various subconsultants through contract negotiations, preliminary engineering, permitting, final design, and construction administration. He holds a Master of Engineering degree in Public Works, has attended numerous transportation seminars, and has held leadership positions on many transportation - related task forces and in professional societies. Professional Experience Public Works Director City of Marco Island 1998 to 2000 ♦ Established the First Public Works Operation for the City (population 30,000). ♦ Successfully transferred services within 30 days (i.e. parks and recreation, streets and drainage, bridges, waterways, land development permitting, and beautification). ♦ Developed master plans and multi -year capital improvements programs for Public Works. ♦ Secured City's first storm water quality improvement grant from the SFWMD. ♦ Established successful privatization program for efficient delivery of services. Representative Proiect Experience Technical Expertise Provided technical expertise for transportation issues affecting land development projects including Ave Maria SRA, Mediterra PUD, Pelican Marsh PUD, Lely PUD, Pelican Bay PUD, and Grey Oaks PUD. Prepared more than 300 Traffic Impact Statements for residential, commercial and public projects. Street and Site Lighting Systems Designed street lighting systems for Arborwood CDD, Woodlands CDD, Airport -Pulling Road, Golden Gate Parkway, Goodlette-Frank Road, and Vanderbilt Beach Road. Completed over 300 site lighting projects - commercial and residential. Traffic Signalization Systems Designed intersection signalization systems for 35 locations in Southwest Florida, including mast arm and concrete strain pole installations. FDOTAccessPermitting Prepared FDOT Access permits for many locations including Pelican Bay, Creekside Blvd, Price Plaza, Naples South Plaza, Moorings Plaza, Fronterra, and Pelican Marsh PUD. Traffic Studies Prepared speed studies, traffic calming, design criteria and traffic monitoring for more than 30 project locations for residential commercial and public sites. Parking Studies Prepared parking studies and parking needs analyses for more than 20 locations for residential, commercial and public sites. Packet Pg. 454 9.C.3 Norman J. Trebilcock AICP, PE, PTOE Professional Qualifications (continued) Transportation Ennine_erina & Desian Services - Hiah Profile Roadway Proie Old 41 Downtown Improvements Reconstruction of Old 41 as a complete street with sidewalks, bike lanes, Design -Build; City of Bonita narrow median, and two roundabouts (in coordination with Michael Springs, FL Wallwork, PE) as part of the design -build team. Provided emergency signal, street lighting, signing and marking, traffic control, and decorative banner arm design services. Fifth Ave South & ThirdAve South Prepared the decorative mast -arm signal design for this downtown Signal Design -Build, City of Naples, intersection as part of a design -build project. FL Estero Parkway Design, Village of Improvements to this 4-lane suburban section roadway from US 41 to Three Estero, FL Oaks Parkway as the Village's first roadway improvement project. TCS was responsible for data collection and analyzed intersections in coordination with roundabout engineer (Michael Wallwork). Prepared Access Management/Design Criteria Report; street lighting plan; signing and marking plan; Traffic Control Plan; speed zoning analysis; and signal warrant analysis study. Rattlesnake Hammock Road The project was a 1-mile reconstruction converting an existing 2-lane rural (CR 864) East of Collier Blvd, section to a 4-lane urban section with on street bike lanes and sidewalks. Collier County, FL Project also included construction of a bridge just east of the intersection with Collier Blvd. Traffic operations design included signing; pavement marking; channelization; lighting; and signalization. TCS worked with different consultants on this corridor and was responsible for varying tasks to include intersection grading, signal modifications, signing/markings, coordination with the bridge construction, and SFWMD permitting at the Rattlesnake Hammock Rd/Collier Blvd intersection. East of Collier Blvd, tasks included: working with staff to adopt a speed limit resolution for roadway (CC Resolution 2013-256); updated the access management plan (Resolution 2013-257); street lighting; signing/marking plans; and pavement design. The roadway terminates at Hacienda Blvd (aka Benfield Rd), which TCS prepared a Design Criteria Report for and prepared street lighting as well as signing/marking plans. Hacienda Blvd is a future parallel reliever facility to Collier Blvd (1.5 miles of the 20 mile corridor runs within Hacienda Lakes PUD). Golden Gate Parkway (CR 886) Managed the planning study for Golden Gate Parkway/Airport Road Grade Separated Overpass. Also managed the design up to 60% plans for the 3-mile reconstruction converting a 4-lane rural section to a 6-lane urban section. Traffic operations design includes signing, pavement marking, channelization, lighting, and signalization. Key coordination element was integrating design into proposed 1-75 interchange at Golden Gate Parkway. Rattlesnake Hammock Road 2-mile reconstruction converting existing 2-lane rural section to a 4-lane (CR864) urban section. Traffic operations design included signing, pavement marking, channelization, lighting, and signalization. Project was characterized as a difficult design relative to existing utilities and constrained right-of-way conditions. Innovative water management design is credited with saving nearly $1 million in right-of-way acquisition costs. Airport Pulling Road (CR 31) Between CR 886 and CR 896 (2 miles), six laning. Traffic operations design included signing, pavement marking, channelization, and lighting. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA 2800 Davis Blvd, Suite 200 1 Naples, FL 34104 1 www.trebilcock.biz Page 2 of 3 Packet Pg. 455 9.C.3 Norman J. Trebilcock, AICP, PE, PTOE Professional Qualifications (continued) Vanderbilt Beach Road (CR 862) 2.1-mile 4-lane of new construction urban highway extension with provisions for six laning. Traffic operations design included signing, pavement marking, channelization, lighting, and signalization. From concept to concrete project, completed in less that half the time (6 vs. 13 years) compared to statewide experience with similar complex highway projects. Successfully permitted alignment through Cocohatchee Strand wetland system, avoiding building a bridge originally identified by permitting agencies: savings over $2 million. Ben Hill Griffin Parkway 3.4-mile 4-lane new construction urban highway with provisions for six lanes in Lee County. Traffic operations design included signing, pavement marking, channelization, and signalization. Reliever highway to 1-75 serves the main access to Florida Gulf Coast University, the state's newest university Engineering Services • South Florida Water Management District surface water management permit assistance on more than 40 residential, commercial, institutional and highway projects totaling over 3,000 acres. Relevant projects include Aster Court Outfall replacement, Bald Eagle Drainage improvements, and Westlake Outfall Pipe Improvement replacements. • Drainage analysis for Olde Florida Golf Club rural access road (1.2 miles) and Whippoorwill Lane (1 mile). Provided technical expertise for transportation issues affecting land development projects including Pelican Marsh, Pelican Bay, Lely and Grey Oaks communities. Designed street lighting system for Airport -Pulling Road, Golden Gate Parkway, Vanderbilt Beach Road, and Airport -Pulling Road intersection with Davis Blvd. Designed arterial roadway signalization systems for 16 locations in Southwest Florida, including mast arm and concrete strain pole installations. FDOT Conceptual Access permits for the Northeast Commercial Area at Pelican Bay, Naples International Park, and Pelican Marsh PUD. Engineering feasibility analysis of infrastructure requirements for Stratford Place Community, White Lake Industrial Park, Orange Blossom Ranch PUD, and Berkshire Lakes Parcel E multi -family development. South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) water use permits for Immokalee Middle School, Collier County YMCA, Sanders Pine, Wyndemere, Foxfire, Emerald Lakes, Smallwood Landscaping, and Bear Creek Apartments. Education Master of Engineering in Public Works, University of Florida Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering, University of Miami Engineer Officer Basic Course, US Army Engineering School Professional Registration(s)/ Professional Engineer, Florida #47116 Certifications Professional Traffic Operations Engineer® (PTOE), Transportation Professional Certification Board Inc. Certified Planner, American Institute of Certified Planners FDOT Advanced Work Zone Traffic Control Certification Professional Affiliations American Planning Association American Institute of Certified Planners American Society of Civil Engineers Florida Engineering Society, Calusa Chapter (Past President) Institute of Transportation Engineers Illuminating Engineering Society Society of American Military Engineers Collier County Community Character Task Force Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA 2800 Davis Blvd, Suite 200 1 Naples, FL 34104 1 www.trebilcock.biz Page 3 of 3 Packet Pg. 4 6 9.C.3 NIM SUMMARY Collier Blvd Lord's Way Subdistrict GMPA (PL-20200000115) Collier Blvd Lord's Way PUDA (PL-20200000114) Wednesday, May 5, 2021 at 5:30 p.m. New Hope Ministries, Event Center, Lecture Hall — Room 211 7675 Davis Boulevard, Naples, FL 34104 The NIM was held for the above referenced petitions. The petitions are described as follows: 1. Collier Blvd Lord's Way Subdistrict GMPA (PL-20200000115) A Growth Management Plan Amendment (GMPA) to amend the future land use subdistrict of Collier Boulevard Community Facility Subdistrict to allow for additional residential development; and 2. Collier Blvd Lord's Way PUDA (PL-20200000114) An amendment to rename the First Assembly Ministries Education and Rehabilitation Campus Mixed Use Planned Development (MPUD) to the Collier Boulevard Lord's Way MPUD, to allow for an additional 384 dwelling units and/or an assisted living facility at a maximum floor area ratio of 0.6. Note: This is a summary of the NIM. An audio recording is also provided. Attendees: On behalf of Applicants: David Torres, ML Land, LLC and 3805 TLW, LLC (Applicant) Richard Yovanovich, Esq., Coleman Yovanovich Koester Robert Mulhere, FAICP, President/CEO, Hole Montes, Inc. Paula McMichael, AICP, Vice President, Planning Services, Hole Montes, Inc. Norman Trebilcock, AICP, PTOE, PE, Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA County Staff: Sue Faulkner, Principal Planner, Comprehensive Planning Nancy Gundlach, AICP, Zoning Services Five members of the public attended. Mr. Mulhere started the presentation by introducing himself, the property owner, the other consultants, and county staff. He explained the NIM process, the process for approval, and provided a brief history and overview of the project. Following Mr. Mulhere's presentation, there was approximately ten minutes of questions. The following issues were raised: Traffic/Access Questions were raised regarding traffic and the surrounding road network and the extension of The Lord's Way. The extension of The Lord's Way to Benfield Road is related to development within c E c a� E Q a. 2 0 LO 0 co 0 N HA2019\2019076MMIM\NIM Summary (5-18-2021).docx Packet Pg. 457 9.C.3 Hacienda Lakes DRI/MPUD, and there is no estimated date of completion at this time. For the extension of The Lord's Way to Rattlesnake Hammock Road, which again is related to the Hacienda Lakes DRI/MPUD, an SDP has been submitted and approved. Construction is estimated to begin within the next twelve months. The existing First Assembly Ministries Education and Rehabilitation Campus Mixed Use Planned Unit Development allows for multiple uses that would create a higher trip generation at buildout. The requested amendment will remove these uses and replace them with multi -family residential, reducing the total volume and decreasing the trip generation. General/Misc. A question was asked regarding the types of units that will be offered. Collier County requires development standards for a range of multi -family product. Although the exact product is not known at this time, Mr. Torres committed to a for -sale product. A question was asked regarding the existing church building on the property. The church will be allowed as an interim use until development of the proposed multi -family residential begins. Once development begins, churches will no longer be a permitted use. If the building cannot be utilized for residential amenities it may need to be removed; however, it is too early in the site planning process to know. The meeting concluded at approximately 5:55 PM. c as E c a� E Q a c� LO 0 co 0 N HA2019\2019076MMIM\NIM Summary (5-18-2021).docx Packet Pg. 458 9.C.3 PARTbt THEUSAIOIDAV�N6tWORK: Published Daily Naples, FL 34110 HOLES MONTES 950 ENCORE WAY STE 200 NAPLES, FL 34110 Affidavit of Publication STATE OF WISCONSIN COUNTY OF BROWN Before the undersigned they serve as the authority, personally appeared who on oath says that they serve as legal clerk of the Naples Daily News, a daily newspaper published at Naples, in Collier County, Florida; distributed in Collier and Lee counties of Florida; that the attached copy of the advertising was published in said newspaper on dates listed. Affiant further says that the said Naples Daily News is a newspaper published at Naples, in said Collier County, Florida, and that the said newspaper has heretofore been continuously published In said Collier County, Florida; distributed in Collier and Lee counties of Florida, each day and has been entered as second class mail matter at the post office in Naples, in said Collier County, Florida , for a period of one year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement and affiant further says that he has neither paid nor promised any person, or corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this advertisement for publication in the said newspaper. Subscribed and sworn to before on April 20th, 2021a Notary, State of WI, County of Brown TARA MONDLOCI-i Notary Public State.ot Wi.scon.sin._,. My commission expires: August 6, 2021 PUBLICATION COST: S945.00 AD NO: GCI0632785 CUSTOMER NO: 530712 POP: PUBLIC NOTICE Packet Pg. 459 9.C.3 The public is invited to attend a neighborhood information meeting held by Robert J. Mulhere, FAICP, President of Hole Montes, Inc., Paula N. C. McMichael, AICP, Vice President of Hole Montes, Inc., and Richard D. i Yovanovich, Esquire, of Coleman, Yovanovich and Koester, P.A. on behalf of the property owner at the following time and location: Wednesday, May 5, 2021 at 5:30 p.m. New Hope Ministries, Event Center, Lecture Hall -Room 211 7675 Davis Boulevard, Naples,.FL 34104 The following two concurrent applications has been made to Collier County Growth Management: .These applications include (1)-Collier Blvd Lord's Way Subdistrict GMPA . (PL-20200000115) A Growth Management Plan Amendment (GMPA) to amend the future land use subdistrict of Collier Boulevard Community Facility Subdistrict to allow for additional residential development; and (2) Collier Blvd Lord's Way PUDA (PL-20200000114) An amendment' to rename the First Assembly Ministries Education and Rehabilitation Campus Mixed Use Planned Development (MPUD) to the Collier Boulevard Lord's Way MPUD, to allow for an additional 384 dwelling units and/or an assisted living facility at a maximum floor area ratio of 0.6. These lands total 68.79t acres and are located in Section 14, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, in the northeastern quadrant of the intersection of Collier Blvd. and The Lord's Way. 95:1 N NTS :Subject: Site 'Q Thelord'.s Way m Ratflesnake Hammock Rd .! Locatlon Ma _... r;,�wsnoiirvyv, p Wa!xnu; Collier Blvd Lord's Wa MbLGMON.7f8„M ,�'ifi71J`�i?i(Oh, %� _. _ .`k;11 $l1bdl5trlCt &MPUD WE VALUE YOUR INPUT Business and property owners, residents and visitors are welcome to attend the presentation and discuss the project with the owners and: Collier County staff. We will be adhering to social distancing protocols: during the meeting. If you would rather pot or are unable to attend the'; meeting and would like to participate via Zoom or view a video of the meeting, please email us at N'.efgYiaorhoodjVfeetrg7frrttcosri and we .will send you a link. You may also email any comments or questions to Neigl ibarhoodMeefirigC rhirrtiurig.' -Please reference Collier Blvd Lord's. Way Subdistric# & MPUD in subject line. Paula N. C. McMichael, AICP, Vice President, Planning Services, Hole Montes, Inc., 950 Encore Way, Naples, FL 34110 Phone: 239-254-2000 NO•GCIOEl770S01 _.. .. ..., c as E c as E Q a. 0 LO 0 co 0 Packet Pg. 460 Ak ► O O O O O Cq O � O 'Q O � N O N Ur � V H h�i HI VJ O �n Qo Ow 1-� O V r� E C N U m a„ U 3 �- G C S O O OO L '�:, O..Q o 'o 1 a r o s o s m O a fa. O a m y r Co E L v 4Lo 3MLn`' -a 'E s v L Qi r 0 o o L.3 a L o o a, f6 �•') = 3 o do w o .5 = c :=sY o um N `A v 7 bp O H u 0 ra �v � u cn (U N 7 fU G a+ � bD O a o = O C a% 16 f2 f0 C L V � N � O O C 0 Mv o� bn.0 4a C. f9 U d +.+ `% L fA p 7 W. Cu' O 3 N L Cu a V o a0m:3 V i CL >. U fQ C Ln N Q N O 4- aU +1 fA f0 L ++ y 41 3 y O O L U N a Cu 4- 0 fo .0 E o 3 L o -O tOif .r f9 � L CU s F-' V a �= C LLI M N V y 4 � y � y a v bc CD E( Z 9.C.3 C as C Q a. C LO 0 w 0 CN Packet Pg. 461 9.C.3 AFFIDAVIT OF COMPLIANCE I hereby certify that pursuant to Ordinance 2004-41, of the Collier County Land Development Code, I did cause the attached newspaper advertisement to appear and I did give notice by mail to the following property owners and/or condominium and civic associations whose members Q a may be affected by the proposed land use changes of an application request for a rezoning, PUD c� amendment, or conditional use, at least 15 days prior to the scheduled Neighborhood Information o Meeting. Forthe purposes of this requirement, the names and addresses of property owners CD shall be deemed those appearing on the latest tax rolls of Collier County and any other persons as or entities who have made a formal request of the county to be notified. The said notice U contained the laymen's description of the site property of proposed change and the date, time, o a and place of a Neighborhood Information Meeting. Per the attached letters, property owner's list, and copy of newspaper advertisement which are hereby made a part of this Affidavit of Compliance. of Applicant) STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER The foregoing Affidavit of Compliance was acknowledged before me this 20th day of April 2021 by means of V physical presence or online notarization, by Paula N. C. McMichael, AICP, Vice President of Hole Montes, Inc., who is personally known to me X— or who has produced as identification. Signature of Notary Public 5\-e. ; kA'\ Printed T4ame of Notary (Notary Seal) � v"rye., STEPHANIE KAROL ?�WA �': Notary Public - State of Florida �i) Commission # GG 965839 `` My Comm. Expires Mar 9, 2024 Bonded through National Notary Assn. HA2019\2019076\wMMAffidavit of Compliance (4-20-2021).doc Packet Pg. 462 �=M9.C.3 HOLE MONTES ENGINEERS • PLANNERS • SURVEYORS 950 Encore Way • Naples, Florida 34110 • Phone 239.254.2000 - Fax: 239,254,2099 April 20, 2021 as Re: Collier Blvd Lord's Way Subdistrict & MPUD E (PUDA-PL20200000114 & GMPA-PL-20200000115) HM File No. 2019.076 E Q a. Dear Property Owner: tn Please be advised that Robert J. Mulhere, FAICP, President of Hole Montes, Inc., Paula N. C. o McMichael, AICP, Vice President of Hole Montes, Inc., and Richard D. Yovanovich, Esquire of Elk Coleman, Yovanovich and Koester, P.A. on behalf of the applicant, have filed two concurrent applications to Collier County Growth Management. These applications include (1) Collier Blvd Lord's Way Subdistrict GMPA (PL-20200000115) A Growth Management Plan Amendment (GMPA) to amend the future land use subdistrict of Collier Boulevard Community Facility Subdistrict to allow for additional residential development; and (2) Collier Blvd Lord's Way PUDA (PL-20200000114) An amendment to rename the First Assembly Ministries Education and Rehabilitation Campus Mixed Use Planned Development (MPUD) to the Collier Boulevard Lord's Way MPUD, to allow for an additional 384 dwelling units and/or an assisted living facility at a maximum floor area ratio of 0.6. These lands total 68.79-+ acres and are located in Section 14, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, in the northeastern quadrant of the intersection of Collier Blvd. and The Lord's Way. In compliance with the Land Development Code requirements, a Neighborhood Information Meeting will be held to provide you an opportunity to hear a presentation about this petition and ask questions. The Neighborhood Information Meeting will be held on Wednesday, May 5, 2021 at 5:30 p.m. at New Hope Ministries, Event Center, Lecture Hall - Room 211, 7675 Davis Boulevard, Naples, Florida 34104. We will be adhering to social distancing protocols during the meeting. If you would rather not or are unable to attend the meeting and would like to participate via Zoom or view a video of the meeting, please email us at Nei hg borhoodMeetinjz@bmeng com and we will send you a link. You may also email any comments or questions to NeijzhborhoodMeeting@hmeng.com. Please reference Collier Blvd Lord's Way Subdistrict and MPUD in subject line. Very truly yours, HOLE MONTES, INC. 6L �!c -) Paula N. C. McMichael, AICP Vice President, Planning Services PNCM/sek Naples • Foil Myers I Packet Pg. 463 W10 3805 TLW LLC 7742 ALICO RD FT MYERS, FL 33912 --- 0 CENTREX CORP LTD 9721 NW 114TH WAY MEDLEY, FL 33178--- 1178 HACIENDA LAKES OF NAPLES LLC 7742 ALICO RD FORT MYERS, FL 33912 --- 0 LORDS WAY 30 LLC 7742 ALI CO RD FORT MYERS, FL 33192 --- 0 LORDS WAY 30 LLC 7742 ALICO RD FT MYERS, FL 33192 --- 0 LORDS WAY 30 LLC 7742 ALICO RD FT MYERS, FL 33192 --- 0 LORDS WAY 30 LLC 7742 ALICO RD FT MYERS, FL 33192 --- 0 LORDS WAY 30 LLC 7742 ALICO RD FT MYERS, FL 33192 --- 0 LORDS WAY 30 LLC 7742 ALICO RD FT MYERS, FL 33192 --- 0 LORDS WAY 30 LLC 7742 ALICO RD FT MYERS, FL 33192 --- 0 09 L8/09 1,90 AaaAV OaAe aIgl,Edwoo ww Lg x ruw 9Z,ewiol op a„anbl,� 0919/09 L5® AaaAV y,!m algl,edwoo „8/9 Z'x „I. azls lagel ALI R GHAHRAMANI MD INVESTMENT LIMITED PARTNERSHIP j 7223 AYRSHIRE LN BOCA RATON, FL 33496--- 1421 I ij I I COLLIER CNTY I TRANSPORTATION RIGHT-OF-WAY i 2885 HORSESHOE DRIVE S NAPLES, FL 34104 --- 0 i I HACIENDA LAKES OF NAPLES LLC , i 7742 ALICO RD FORT j MYERS, FL 33912---0 j I LORDS WAY 30 LLC 7742 ALICO RD FT MYERS, FL 33192 --- 0 LORDS WAY 30 LLC 7742 ALI CO RD FT MYERS, FL 33192 --- 0 I LORDS WAY 30 LLC 7742 ALICO RD FT MYERS, FL 33192 --- 0 LORDS WAY 30 LLC 7742 ALICO RD Ff MYERS, FL 33192 --- 0 i LORDS WAY 30 LLC 7742 ALI CO RD FT MYERS, FL 33192 --- 0 i LORDS WAY 30 LLC 7742 ALICO RD FT MYERS, FL 33192---0 i j LORDS WAY 30 LLC 7742 ALICO RD j FT MYERS, FL 33192 --- 0 I I i i j label size 1" x 2 5/8" compatible with Avery 05160/8160 6+;--*# Al f--f 9G — v R7 -- —,—fihlc —e A,,—v (-alFirn/Qi Rfl 9.c.3 BAILEY, NATALIE KARENE 3786 SAPPHIRE COVE CIR NAPLES, FL 34114 --- 0 COLLIER COUNTY 3335 TAMIAMI TRAIL E NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 LORDS WAY 3D LLC 7742 ALI CO RD FORT MYERS, FL 33192 --- 0 LORDS WAY 30 LLC 7742 ALI CO RD FT MYERS, FL 33192 --- 0 LORDS WAY 30 LLC 7742 ALICO RD FT MYERS, FL 33192 --- 0 LORDS WAY 30 LLC 7742 ALICO RD FT MYERS, FL 33192 --- 0 LORDS WAY 30 LLC 7742 ALICO RD FT MYERS, FL 33192 --- 0 LORDS WAY 30 LLC 7742 ALI CO RD FT MYERS, FL 33192 --- 0 LORDS WAY 30 LLC '7742 ALICO RD FT MYERS, FL 33192 --- 0 LORDS WAY 30 LLC 7742 ALICO RD FT MYERS, FL 33192 --- 0 Packet Pg. 464 nA A VV0 LORDS WAY 30 LLC 7742 ALICO RD FT MYERS, FL 33192 --- 0 LORDS WAY 30 LLC 7742 ALICO RD FT MYERS, FL 33192 --- 0 LORDS WAY 30 LLC 7742 ALICO RD FT MYERS, FL 33192 --- 0 LORDS WAY 30 LLC 7742 ALICO RD FT MYERS, FL 33192 --- 0 MILLET, MARY G 3791 SAPPHIRE COVE CIR NAPLES, FL 34114 --- 0 NAPLES LAKES COUNTRY CLUB HOMEOWNERS ASSOC INC 4784 NAPLES LAKES BLVD NAPLES, FL 34112--- 2970 SLACK, MICHAEL KITZEL LAUREN KRANAK SLACK 3790 SAPPHIRE COVE CIR NAPLES, FL 34114 --- 0 THOMAS, JANE SUSAN HILTY 3628 SAPPHIRE COVE CIR NAPLES, FL 34114 --- 0 Esplanade at Hacienda Lakes Homeowners Association, Inc. 28100 Bonita Grande Drive, Ste. 102 Bonita Springs, FL 34135 rFA 55Qo r 09 [8/09 G9® I A@AV DUB alglJedwoo ww Zg x ww 9Z teuiaot op a}}anbll3 09l.8/09 i.9® kany gtlrm algltedwoo „8/g Z x „L azls lapel LORDS WAY 30 LLC 7742 ALICO RD FT MYERS, FL 33192 --- 0 i i I LORDS WAY 30 LLC 7742 ALICO RD FT MYERS, FL 33192 --- 0 LORDS WAY 30 LLC 7742 ALICO RD FT MYERS, FL 33192 --- 0 LORDS WAY 30 LLC 7742 ALICO RD FT MYERS, FL 33192 --- 0 ML LAND LLC 7742 ALICO RD FT MYERS, FL 33912 --- 0 NAPLES LAKES COUNTRY CLUB HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION INC 4.784 NAPLES LAKES BLVD NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 STRATTON, HEATHER 3616 SAPHIRE COVE CIR NAPLES, FL 34114 --- 0 BONITA FLORES I LLC 1447 HURON ROAD RR #2 PETERSBURG NOB 2HO CANADA S'�j � 9.C.3 0 LORDS WAY 30 LLC 7742 ALICO RD FT MYERS, FL 33192 --- 0 LORDS WAY 30 LLC 7742 ALICO RD FT MYERS, FL 33192 --- 0 LORDS WAY 30 LLC 7742 ALICO RD FT MYERS, FL 33192 --- 0 MATSON III, DUFFIELD W &SARAH 4960 SUNSET DR MIAMI, FL 33143 --- 0 NAPLES LAKES COUNTRY CLUB HOMEOWNERS ASSOC INC 4784 NAPLES LAKES BLVD NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 NAPLES LKS COUNTRY CLUB HOMEOWNERS ASSOC INC 4784 NAPLES LAKES BLVD NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 SWAMP BUGGY INC PO BOX 10528 NAPLES, FL 34101 --- 0 l� East Naples Civic Association, Inc. PMB #49 8595 Collier Blvd., Ste. 107 Naples, FL 34114 Azure at Hacienda Lakes Homeowners Association, Inc. 8808 Saint Lucia Drive Naples, FL 34114 i I I� i label size 1" x 2 5/8" compatible with Avery 05160/8160 C d E c E Q d LO 0 co 0 F4 Packet Pg. 465 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARI 9.C.4 Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) at 9:00 A.M., November 4, 2021, in the Board of County Commissioners Meeting Room, Third Floor, Collier Government ( er, 3299 Tamiami Trail East, Naples, FL, to consider: A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONER COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA PROPOSING AMENDMENT TO ORDIN NO. 89-05, AS AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGE PLAN FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLC SPECIFICALLY AMENDING THE FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT TO CH THE MIXED USE DISTRICT, COLLIER BOULEVARD COMMUNITY FA( SUBDISTRICT TO THE MIXED USE DISTRICT, COLLIER BOULE LORD'S WAY MIXED USE SUBDISTRICT; TO INCREASE THE MAX DWELLING UNITS FROM 306 TO 690; TO REMOVE CHURCHES AND I CARE FACILITIES AS ALLOWED USES; AND FURTHERMORE DIREI TRANSMITTAL OF THE AMENDMENT TO THE FLORIDA DEPARTMEI ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED O NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE INTERSECTION OF COLLIER BOULE AND LORD'S WAY IN SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 CONSISTING OF 69± ACRES. [PL20200000115] Project Location —4 m �b — i!o The Lords WAY Ratll4srial�p fts'mrtwc.. _ __ All interested parties are invited to appear and be heard. A copy of the pror resolution will be made available for inspection at the Collier County Clerk Office, Fourth Floor, Collier County Government Center, 3299 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 401, Naples, FL, one week prior to the scheduled hearing. Writt, comments must be filed with the Zoning Division, Zoning Services Section, to November 4, 2021. As part of an ongoing initiative to promote social distancing during the CO\ pandemic, the public will have the opportunity to provide public comments remotely, as well as in person, during this proceeding. Individuals who wou to participate remotely, should register any time after the agenda is posted the County website which is 6 days before the meeting through the link pre on the front page of the County website at www.colliercountyfl.gov. Individi who register will receive an email in advance of the public hearing detailing how they can participate remotely in this meeting. For additional informatio about the meeting, please call Thomas Clarke at (239) 252-2526 or email tc CCPCRemoteParticipationCCPCRemoteParticipation@CollierCountyFL.gov. Any person who decides to appeal any decision of the Collier County Plar Commission will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto and therefore, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal i based. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in orde participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the pro of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Managerr Division, located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 101, Naples, FL 34112-,, (239) 252-8380, at least two days prior to the meeting. Assisted listening d( for the hearing impaired are available in the Board of County Commissionerz, Office. - )F 'E N 4T 'A, aE cn rY ID IM -DD u_ IG )F iE E ID E >T, 0 U m aD 0 U LO r 0 0 O O O N O N J (L m d E a� E Q )r a 19 LO 0 cfl :e 0 N d 0 4 0 oo ti _o U C9 � 0 Z le, m E t c� Qm �s Collier County Planning Commission Edwin Fryer, Chairman Packet Pg. 466 9.C.5 NIM SUMMARY Collier Blvd Lord's Way Subdistrict GMPA (PL-20200000115) Collier Blvd Lord's Way PUDA (PL-20200000114) Wednesday, May 5, 2021 at 5:30 p.m. New Hope Ministries, Event Center, Lecture Hall — Room 211 7675 Davis Boulevard, Naples, FL 34104 The NIM was held for the above referenced petitions. The petitions are described as follows: 1. Collier Blvd Lord's Way Subdistrict GMPA (PL-20200000115) A Growth Management Plan Amendment (GMPA) to amend the future land use subdistrict of Collier Boulevard Community Facility Subdistrict to allow for additional residential development; and 2. Collier Blvd Lord's Way PUDA (PL-20200000114) An amendment to rename the First Assembly Ministries Education and Rehabilitation Campus Mixed Use Planned Development (MPUD) to the Collier Boulevard Lord's Way MPUD, to allow for an additional 384 dwelling units and/or an assisted living facility at a maximum floor area ratio of 0.6. Note: This is a summary of the NIM. An audio recording is also provided. Attendees: On behalf of Applicants: David Torres, ML Land, LLC and 3805 TLW, LLC (Applicant) Richard Yovanovich, Esq., Coleman Yovanovich Koester Robert Mulhere, FAICP, President/CEO, Hole Montes, Inc. Paula McMichael, AICP, Vice President, Planning Services, Hole Montes, Inc. Norman Trebilcock, AICP, PTOE, PE, Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA County Staff: Sue Faulkner, Principal Planner, Comprehensive Planning Nancy Gundlach, AICP, Zoning Services Five members of the public attended. Mr. Mulhere started the presentation by introducing himself, the property owner, the other consultants, and county staff. He explained the NIM process, the process for approval, and provided a brief history and overview of the project. Following Mr. Mulhere's presentation, there was approximately ten minutes of questions. The following issues were raised: Traffic/Access Questions were raised regarding traffic and the surrounding road network and the extension of The Lord's Way. The extension of The Lord's Way to Benfield Road is related to development within HA2019\2019076MMIM\NIM Summary (5-18-2021).docx Packet Pg. 467 9.C.5 Hacienda Lakes DRI/MPUD, and there is no estimated date of completion at this time. For the extension of The Lord's Way to Rattlesnake Hammock Road, which again is related to the Hacienda Lakes DRI/MPUD, an SDP has been submitted and approved. Construction is estimated to begin within the next twelve months. The existing First Assembly Ministries Education and Rehabilitation Campus Mixed Use Planned Unit Development allows for multiple uses that would create a higher trip generation at buildout. The requested amendment will remove these uses and replace them with multi -family residential, reducing the total volume and decreasing the trip generation. General/Misc. A question was asked regarding the types of units that will be offered. Collier County requires development standards for a range of multi -family product. Although the exact product is not known at this time, Mr. Torres committed to a for -sale product. A question was asked regarding the existing church building on the property. The church will be allowed as an interim use until development of the proposed multi -family residential begins. Once development begins, churches will no longer be a permitted use. If the building cannot be utilized for residential amenities it may need to be removed; however, it is too early in the site planning process to know. The meeting concluded at approximately 5:55 PM. HA2019\2019076MMIM\NIM Summary (5-18-2021).docx Packet Pg. 468 9.C.5 PARTbt THEUSAIOIDAV�N6tWORK: Published Daily Naples, FL 34110 HOLES MONTES 950 ENCORE WAY STE 200 NAPLES, FL 34110 Affidavit of Publication STATE OF WISCONSIN COUNTY OF BROWN Before the undersigned they serve as the authority, personally appeared who on oath says that they serve as legal clerk of the Naples Daily News, a daily newspaper published at Naples, in Collier County, Florida; distributed in Collier and Lee counties of Florida; that the attached copy of the advertising was published in said newspaper on dates listed. Affiant further says that the said Naples Daily News is a newspaper published at Naples, in said Collier County, Florida, and that the said newspaper has heretofore been continuously published In said Collier County, Florida; distributed in Collier and Lee counties of Florida, each day and has been entered as second class mail matter at the post office in Naples, in said Collier County, Florida , for a period of one year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement and affiant further says that he has neither paid nor promised any person, or corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this advertisement for publication in the said newspaper. Subscribed and sworn to before on April 20th, 2021a Notary, State of WI, County of Brown TARA MONDLOCI-i Notary Public State.ot Wi.scon.sin._,. My commission expires: August 6, 2021 PUBLICATION COST: S945.00 AD NO: GCI0632785 CUSTOMER NO: 530712 POP: PUBLIC NOTICE Packet Pg. 469 9.C.5 The public is invited to attend a neighborhood information meeting held by Robert J. Mulhere, FAICP, President of Hole Montes, Inc., Paula N. C. McMichael, AICP, Vice President of Hole Montes, Inc., and Richard D. i Yovanovich, Esquire, of Coleman, Yovanovich and Koester, P.A. on behalf of the property owner at the following time and location: Wednesday, May 5, 2021 at 5:30 p.m. New Hope Ministries, Event Center, Lecture Hall -Room 211 7675 Davis Boulevard, Naples,.FL 34104 The following two concurrent applications has been made to Collier County Growth Management: .These applications include (1)-Collier Blvd Lord's Way Subdistrict GMPA . (PL-20200000115) A Growth Management Plan Amendment (GMPA) to amend the future land use subdistrict of Collier Boulevard Community Facility Subdistrict to allow for additional residential development; and (2) Collier Blvd Lord's Way PUDA (PL-20200000114) An amendment' to rename the First Assembly Ministries Education and Rehabilitation Campus Mixed Use Planned Development (MPUD) to the Collier Boulevard Lord's Way MPUD, to allow for an additional 384 dwelling units and/or an assisted living facility at a maximum floor area ratio of 0.6. These lands total 68.79t acres and are located in Section 14, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, in the northeastern quadrant of the intersection of Collier Blvd. and The Lord's Way. 95:1 N NTS :Subject: Site 'Q Thelord'.s Way m Ratflesnake Hammock Rd .! Locatlon Ma _... r;,�wsnoiirvyv, p Wa!xnu; Collier Blvd Lord's Way I:IbLGMON.7f8„M ,1ifi71J`�i?i(�Oh, ild c rt rpicilixMravlw $l1bdl5trlCt &MPUD WE VALUE YOUR INPUT Business and property owners, residents and visitors are welcome to attend the presentation and discuss the project with the owners and: Collier County staff. We will be adhering to social distancing protocols: during the meeting. If you would rather not or are unable to attend the'; meeting and would like to participate via Zoom or view a video of the meeting, please email us at N'.efgYiaorhoodjVfeetrg7frrttcosri and we .will send you a link. You may also email any comments or questions to NeigliborhoodMeetirigftm_4 ig.e°m' -Please reference Collier Blvd Lord's, Way Subdistric# & MPUD in subject line. Paula N. C. McMichael, AICP, Vice President, Planning Services, Hole Montes, Inc., 950 Encore Way, Naples, FL 34110 Phone: 239-254-2000 NO•GCIOEl770S01 _.. .. ..., Packet Pg. 470 Ak ► O O O O O Cq O � O Q O � N O N Ur � V H h�i HI VJ O �n Qo Ow 1-� O V r� N U m v U 3 �- G _ O O O O G. L Q .O O v0- r. o s m sCL a yr Co L E L 4o 3MLn`' toE 4- •L Qi = o L.o 0 L o o 0 .p0 a + Co u = 3 o w o .5 = c = s Y o um N `A v 7 O r N1 �v N V to o b bD 0 a+ a = = O (Q C L WO- U i Cu f00 O = 0 Mv o� bn.0 C. 00 7 m U d +.+ L VI 0 7 U 0 ' =O UE 3 a U 0 L Cu O 41 a U0 U 0 U (Q = Vf -0 N O 41 3 Q 45 y d 41 3 y o O L U N _a a) 0 m s _ E o 3 L O s y .r O a) L aj s F- V L \, M N a 14 k v 4' J V � y 4 � y � y a v Z 9.C.5 R LO 0 0 v Packet Pg. 471 9.C.5 AFFIDAVIT OF COMPLIANCE I hereby certify that pursuant to Ordinance 2004-41, of the Collier County Land Development Code, I did cause the attached newspaper advertisement to appear and I did give notice by mail to the following property owners and/or condominium and civic associations whose members may be affected by the proposed land use changes of an application request for a rezoning, PUD amendment, or conditional use, at least 15 days prior to the scheduled Neighborhood Information Meeting. For the purposes of this requirement, the names and addresses of property owners shall be deemed those appearing on the latest tax rolls of Collier County and any other persons or entities who have made a formal request of the county to be notified. The said notice contained the laymen's description of the site property of proposed change and the date, time, and place of a Neighborhood Information Meeting. Per the attached letters, property owner's list, and copy of newspaper advertisement which are hereby made a part of this Affidavit of Compliance. of Applicant) STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER The foregoing Affidavit of Compliance was acknowledged before me this 20th day of April 2021 by means of V physical presence or online notarization, by Paula N. C. McMichael, AICP, Vice President of Hole Montes, Inc., who is personally known to me X— or who has produced as identification. Signature of Notary Public 5\-e. ; kA'\ Printed T4ame of Notary (Notary Seal) � v"rye., STEPHANIE KAROL ?�WA �': Notary Public - State of Florida �i) Commission # GG 965839 `` My Comm. Expires Mar 9, 2024 Bonded through National Notary Assn. HA2019\2019076\wMMAffidavit of Compliance (4-20-2021).doc Packet Pg. 472 �=M HOLE MONTES ENGINEERS • PLANNERS • SURVEYORS 950 Encore Way • Naples, Florida 34110 • Phone 239.254.2000 - Fax: 239,254,2099 April 20, 2021 Re: Collier Blvd Lord's Way Subdistrict & MPUD (PUDA-PL20200000114 & GMPA-PL-20200000115) HM File No. 2019.076 Dear Property Owner: Please be advised that Robert J. Mulhere, FAICP, President of Hole Montes, Inc., Paula N. C. McMichael, AICP, Vice President of Hole Montes, Inc., and Richard D. Yovanovich, Esquire of Coleman, Yovanovich and Koester, P.A. on behalf of the applicant, have filed two concurrent applications to Collier County Growth Management. These applications include (1) Collier Blvd Lord's Way Subdistrict GMPA (PL-20200000115) A Growth Management Plan Amendment (GMPA) to amend the future land use subdistrict of Collier Boulevard Community Facility Subdistrict to allow for additional residential development; and (2) Collier Blvd Lord's Way PUDA (PL-20200000114) An amendment to rename the First Assembly Ministries Education and Rehabilitation Campus Mixed Use Planned Development (MPUD) to the Collier Boulevard Lord's Way MPUD, to allow for an additional 384 dwelling units and/or an assisted living facility at a maximum floor area ratio of 0.6. These lands total 68.79-+ acres and are located in Section 14, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, in the northeastern quadrant of the intersection of Collier Blvd. and The Lord's Way. In compliance with the Land Development Code requirements, a Neighborhood Information Meeting will be held to provide you an opportunity to hear a presentation about this petition and ask questions. The Neighborhood Information Meeting will be held on Wednesday, May 5, 2021 at 5:30 p.m. at New Hope Ministries, Event Center, Lecture Hall - Room 211, 7675 Davis Boulevard, Naples, Florida 34104. We will be adhering to social distancing protocols during the meeting. If you would rather not or are unable to attend the meeting and would like to participate via Zoom or view a video of the meeting, please email us at Nei hg borhoodMeetinjz@bmeng com and we will send you a link. You may also email any comments or questions to NeijzhborhoodMeeting@hmeng.com. Please reference Collier Blvd Lord's Way Subdistrict and MPUD in subject line. Very truly yours, HOLE MONTES, INC. 6L �!c -) Paula N. C. McMichael, AICP Vice President, Planning Services PNCM/sek F9.C.5771 R Naples • Foil Myers I Packet Pg. 473 W10 3805 TLW LLC 7742 ALICO RD FT MYERS, FL 33912 --- 0 CENTREX CORP LTD 9721 NW 114TH WAY MEDLEY, FL 33178--- 1178 HACIENDA LAKES OF NAPLES LLC 7742 ALICO RD FORT MYERS, FL 33912 --- 0 LORDS WAY 30 LLC 7742 ALI CO RD FORT MYERS, FL 33192 --- 0 LORDS WAY 30 LLC 7742 ALICO RD FT MYERS, FL 33192 --- 0 LORDS WAY 30 LLC 7742 ALICO RD FT MYERS, FL 33192 --- 0 LORDS WAY 30 LLC 7742 ALICO RD FT MYERS, FL 33192 --- 0 LORDS WAY 30 LLC 7742 ALICO RD FT MYERS, FL 33192 --- 0 LORDS WAY 30 LLC 7742 ALICO RD FT MYERS, FL 33192 --- 0 LORDS WAY 30 LLC 7742 ALICO RD FT MYERS, FL 33192 --- 0 09 L8/09 1,90 AaaAV OaAe aIgl,Edwoo ww Lg x ruw 9Z,ewiol op a„anbl,� 0919/09 L5® AaaAV y,!m algl,edwoo „8/9 Z'x „I. azls lagel ALI R GHAHRAMANI MD INVESTMENT LIMITED PARTNERSHIP j 7223 AYRSHIRE LN BOCA RATON, FL 33496--- 1421 I ij I COLLIER CNTY TRANSPORTATION RIGHT-OF-WAY i 2885 HORSESHOE DRIVE S NAPLES, FL 34104 --- 0 i I HACIENDA LAKES OF NAPLES LLC , i 7742 ALICO RD FORT j MYERS, FL 33912---0 j I LORDS WAY 30 LLC 7742 ALICO RD FT MYERS, FL 33192 --- 0 LORDS WAY 30 LLC 7742 ALI CO RD FT MYERS, FL 33192 --- 0 I LORDS WAY 30 LLC 7742 ALICO RD FT MYERS, FL 33192 --- 0 LORDS WAY 30 LLC 7742 ALICO RD Ff MYERS, FL 33192 --- 0 i LORDS WAY 30 LLC 7742 ALI CO RD j FT MYERS, FL 33192 --- 0 i i LORDS WAY 30 LLC 7742 ALICO RD FT MYERS, FL 33192---0 i j LORDS WAY 30 LLC 7742 ALICO RD j FT MYERS, FL 33192 --- 0 I I i i j label size 1" x 2 5/8" compatible with Avery 05160/8160 6+;--*# Al f--f 9G — v R7 -- —,—fihlc —e A,,—v (-alFirn/Qi Rfl 1d@S10-'9- BAILEY, NATALIE KARENE 3786 SAPPHIRE COVE CIR NAPLES, FL 34114 --- 0 COLLIER COUNTY 3335 TAMIAMI TRAIL E NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 LORDS WAY 3D LLC 7742 ALI CO RD FORT MYERS, FL 33192 --- 0 LORDS WAY 30 LLC 7742 ALI CO RD FT MYERS, FL 33192 --- 0 LORDS WAY 30 LLC 7742 ALICO RD FT MYERS, FL 33192 --- 0 LORDS WAY 30 LLC 7742 ALICO RD FT MYERS, FL 33192 --- 0 LORDS WAY 30 LLC 7742 ALICO RD FT MYERS, FL 33192 --- 0 to LORDS WAY 30 LLC 7742 ALI CO RD m FT MYERS, FL 33192 --- 0 O 0 2 Z LORDS WAY 30 LLC +� '7742 ALICO RD d FT MYERS, FL 33192 --- 0 E L V t4 a LORDS WAY 30 LLC 7742 ALICO RD FT MYERS, FL 33192 --- 0 Packet Pg. 474 nA A VV0 LORDS WAY 30 LLC 7742 ALICO RD FT MYERS, FL 33192 --- 0 LORDS WAY 30 LLC 7742 ALICO RD FT MYERS, FL 33192 --- 0 LORDS WAY 30 LLC 7742 ALICO RD FT MYERS, FL 33192 --- 0 LORDS WAY 30 LLC 7742 ALICO RD FT MYERS, FL 33192 --- 0 MILLET, MARY G 3791 SAPPHIRE COVE CIR NAPLES, FL 34114 --- 0 NAPLES LAKES COUNTRY CLUB HOMEOWNERS ASSOC INC 4784 NAPLES LAKES BLVD NAPLES, FL 34112--- 2970 SLACK, MICHAEL KITZEL LAUREN KRANAK SLACK 3790 SAPPHIRE COVE CIR NAPLES, FL 34114 --- 0 THOMAS, JANE SUSAN HILTY 3628 SAPPHIRE COVE CIR NAPLES, FL 34114 --- 0 Esplanade at Hacienda Lakes Homeowners Association, Inc. 28100 Bonita Grande Drive, Ste. 102 Bonita Springs, FL 34135 rFA 55Qo r 09 [8/09 G9® I A@AV DUB alglJedwoo ww Zg x ww 9Z teuiaot op a}}anbll3 09l.8/09 i.9® kany gtlrm algltedwoo „8/g Z x „L azls lapel LORDS WAY 30 LLC 7742 ALICO RD FT MYERS, FL 33192 --- 0 i i I LORDS WAY 30 LLC 7742 ALICO RD FT MYERS, FL 33192 --- 0 LORDS WAY 30 LLC 7742 ALICO RD FT MYERS, FL 33192 --- 0 LORDS WAY 30 LLC 7742 ALICO RD FT MYERS, FL 33192 --- 0 ML LAND LLC 7742 ALICO RD FT MYERS, FL 33912 --- 0 NAPLES LAKES COUNTRY CLUB HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION INC 4.784 NAPLES LAKES BLVD NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 STRATTON, HEATHER 3616 SAPHIRE COVE CIR NAPLES, FL 34114 --- 0 BONITA FLORES I LLC 1447 HURON ROAD RR #2 PETERSBURG NOB 2HO CANADA S'�j � 9.C.5 0 LORDS WAY 30 LLC 7742 ALICO RD FT MYERS, FL 33192 --- 0 LORDS WAY 30 LLC 7742 ALICO RD FT MYERS, FL 33192 --- 0 LORDS WAY 30 LLC 7742 ALICO RD FT MYERS, FL 33192 --- 0 MATSON III, DUFFIELD W &SARAH 4960 SUNSET DR MIAMI, FL 33143 --- 0 NAPLES LAKES COUNTRY CLUB HOMEOWNERS ASSOC INC 4784 NAPLES LAKES BLVD NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 NAPLES LKS COUNTRY CLUB HOMEOWNERS ASSOC INC 4784 NAPLES LAKES BLVD NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 SWAMP BUGGY INC PO BOX 10528 NAPLES, FL 34101 --- 0 l� East Naples Civic Association, Inc. PMB #49 8595 Collier Blvd., Ste. 107 Naples, FL 34114 Azure at Hacienda Lakes Homeowners Association, Inc. 8808 Saint Lucia Drive Naples, FL 34114 i I I� i label size 1" x 2 5/8" compatible with Avery 05160/8160 a Packet Pg. 475 1�.06J j 9.C.6 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the Collier County Board of County Commissioners (t3CC) on December 14, 2021, in the Board of County Commissioners Meeting Room, Third Floor, Collier Government Center, 3299 East Tamiami Trail, Naples, FL, to consider the enactment of a County Resolution. The meeting will commence at 9:00 A.M. The title of the proposed Resolution is as follows: A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA PROPOSING AMENDMENT TO ORDINANCE NO.69-05, AS AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, SPECIFICALLY AMENDING THE FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT TO CHANGE THE MIXED USE DISTRICT, COLLIER BOULEVARD COMMUNITY FACILITY SUBDISTRICT TO THE MIXED USE DISTRICT, COLLIER BOULEVARD LORD'S WAY MIXED USE SUBDISTRICT; TO INCREASE THE MAXIMUM, DWELLING UNITS FROM 306 TO 690 WITH SOME AFFORDABLE HOUSING; TO REMOVE CHILD CARE FACILITIES AS AN ALLOWED USE AND ALLOW THE CHURCH TO CONTINUE AS AN INTERIM USE FOR UP TO 5 YEARS; AND FURTHERMORE DIRECTING TRANSMITTAL OF THE AMENDMENT TO THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY 1S LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE INTERSECTION OF COLLIER BOULEVARD AND`HACIENDA LAKES PARKWAY FORMERLY KNOWN AS LORD'S WAY IN SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, CONSISTING OF 692 ACRES. [PL20200000115) 11 Project J Location 0 J "ym Id O The Lords WAY Rattlesnake Hammock ��gg R� al A copy of the proposed Resolution is on file with the Clerk to the Board and is available for inspection. All interested parties are invited to attend and be heard. NOTE: All persons wishing to speak on any agenda Rem must register with the County Manager prior to presentation of the agenda item to be addressed. Individual speakers will be limited to 3 minutes on any item. The selection of any individual to speak on behalf of an organization or group is encouraged. If recognized by the Chairman, a spokesperson for a group or organization may be allotted 10 minutes to speak on an item. Persons wishing to have written or graphic materials included in the Board agenda packets must submit said material a minimum of 3 weeks prior to the respective public hearing. In any case, written materials intended to be considered by the Board shall be submitted to the appropriate County staff a minimum of seven days prior to the public hearing. Ali materials used in presentations before the Board will become a permanent part of the record. As part of an ongoing initiative to encourage public involvement,the public will have the opportunity to provide public comments remotely, as well as in person, during this proceeding. individuals who would like to participate remotely should register through the link provided within the specific, event/meeting entry on the Calendar of Events on the County website at www.colliercountvfl.eov/Dur-county/visdors/calendar-of-events after the agenda is posted on the County website. Registration should be done in advance of the public meeting or any deadline specified within the public meeting notice. Individuals who register will receive an email in advance of the public hearing detailing how they can participate remotely in this meeting. Remote participation is provided as a courtesy and is at the user's risk. The County is not responsible for technical issues. For additional information about the meeting, please call Geoffrey Willig at 252-8369 or email to Geoffrev.Willi olliercaua Ii�gl ov Any person who decides to appeal any decision of the Board will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto and therefore, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is based. It you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled; at no cast to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Division, located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 101, Naples, FL 34112-5356, (239) 252-8380, at least two days prior to the meeting. Assisted listening devices for the hearing impaired are available in the Board of County Commissioners Office, BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA PENNY TAYLOR, CHAIRMAN CRYSTAL K. KINZEL, CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT & COMPTROLLER By: Ann Jennejohn Deputy Clerk (SEAL) ND-GCIO»BZiS-0i J ah a E2 v n z 0 m 3 m m N rn N 0 N Z a ti m a a r= Z M Packet Pg. 476