Loading...
Agenda 10/26/2021 Item #17H (Ordinance - RCMA Immokalee)17.H 10/26/2021 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This item requires ex parte disclosure be provided by the Commission members. Should a hearing be held on this item, all participants are required to be sworn in. Recommendation to approve Ordinance Number 2004-41, as amended, the Collier County Land Development Code, which established the comprehensive zoning regulations for the unincorporated area of Collier County, Florida, by amending the appropriate zoning atlas map or maps by changing the zoning classification of the herein described real property from a Rural Agricultural (A) Zoning District within the Immokalee Area Overlay and the Wellfield Risk Management Special Treatment Overlay Zones W-1 through W-4 to a Mixed -Use Planned Unit Development (MPUD) Zoning District within the Immokalee Area Overlay and the Wellfield Risk Management Special Treatment Overlay Zones W-1 through W-4 for the project to be known as RCMA Immokalee MPUD, to allow construction of a 250 student childcare center (pre-school), 700 student school, community center and a maximum of 160 multi -family residential dwelling units on property located at the northwest quadrant of Lake Trafford Road and Carson Road, in Section 31, Township 46 South, Range 29 East, consisting of 62.22f acres; and by providing an effective date. [PL20200001827] OBJECTIVE: To have the Board of County Commissioners (Board) review staff s findings and recommendations along with the recommendations of the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) regarding the above -referenced petition, render a decision regarding this rezoning petition and ensure the project is in harmony with all the applicable codes and regulations in order to ensure that the community's interests are maintained. CONSIDERATIONS: The subject property is located at the northwest quadrant of Lake Trafford Road and Carson Road, in Section 31, Township 46 South, Range 29 East, Collier County, Florida, consisting of 62.22+/- acres. This petition seeks to rezone the property to MPUD to allow for the development of a 250-student childcare center (preschool), 700 student school, community center, and a maximum of 160 residential dwelling units. FISCAL IMPACT: The PUD Rezone (PUDZ) by and of itself will have no fiscal impact on Collier County. There is no guarantee that the project, at build -out, will maximize its authorized level of development. However, if the PUD Rezone is approved, a portion of the land could be developed, and the new development will result in an impact on Collier County public facilities. The County collects impact fees prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy to help offset the impacts of each new development on public facilities. These impact fees are used to fund projects identified in the Capital Improvement Element of the Growth Management Plan (GMP) as needed to maintain the adopted Level of Service (LOS) for public facilities. Other fees collected prior to issuance of a building permit include building permit review fees. Please note that impact fees and taxes collected were not included in the criteria used by staff and the Planning Commission to analyze this petition. GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: The 62.2-acre subject site is designated Urban, Urban Mixed - Use District, High Residential Subdistrict on the Immokalee Future Land Use Map. It is zoned Agricultural. Urban Mixed -Use District allows both public and private schools as well as residential and community facilities. The applicant is requesting a MPUD with a maximum of 700 students in K-8, 250 student pre-school, 5000 square feet Intermediate Commercial (C-3). The applicant is requesting Multi Family housing (up to 160 MF DUs on 63 acres, which is 2.5 DU/A which is consistent with the IAMP). The requested uses are all consistent with the Immokalee Area Master Plan. The project is a unified Mixed Use Planned Unit Development. Although the residential component of the PUD may not be Packet Pg. 2009 17.H 10/26/2021 developed by RCMA, it will be developed in a cooperative manner with the intent to have the residential integrated into the school and charter school portion of the PUD. The applicant wants to reduce the buffers due to the cooperative nature of the two uses. The applicant is also requesting an additional deviation. Based upon the above analysis, this proposed PUDZ may be deemed consistent with the Immokalee Area Master Plan (IAMP) and the FLUE. Transportation Element: In evaluating this project, staff reviewed the applicant's April 6, 2021 (revised) Traffic Impact Statement for consistency with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the Growth Management Plan (GMP) using the 2020 Annual Update and Inventory Reports (AUIR). Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the GMP states; "The County Commission shall review all rezone petitions, SRA designation applications, conditional use petitions, and proposed amendments to the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) affecting the overall countywide density or intensity of permissible development, with consideration of their impact on the overall County transportation system, and shall not approve any petition or application that would directly access a deficient roadway segment as identified in the current AUIR or if it impacts an adjacent roadway segment that is deficient as identified in the current AUIR, or which significantly impacts a roadway segment or adjacent roadway segment that is currently operating and/or is projected to operate below an adopted Level of Service Standard within the five year AUIR planning period, unless specific mitigating stipulations are also approved. A petition or application has significant impacts if the traffic impact statement reveals that any of the following occur: a. For links (roadway segments) directly accessed by the project where project traffic is equal to or exceeds 2% of the adopted LOS standard service volume; b. For links adjacent to links directly accessed by the project where project traffic is equal to or exceeds 2% of the adopted LOS standard service volume; and c. For all other links the project traffic is considered to be significant up to the point where it is equal to or exceeds 3% of the adopted LOS standard service volume. Mitigating stipulations shall be based upon a mitigation plan prepared by the applicant and submitted as part of the traffic impact statement that addresses the project's significant impacts on all roadways. " Staff finding: According to the TIS provided with this petition the proposed RCMA Immokalee Development will include 160 multi -family residential units, a 700 student K-8 Charter School, a 250 student Day Care and a 5,000 square foot retail center and it will generate a projected total of +/- 424 PM peak hour, 2-way trips on the adjacent roadway segments. The projected trips generated by this development will occur on the following adjacent roadway network links according to the current 2020 AUIR: Roadway/Link # I Link 2020 Current Peak Hour Projected 2020 AUIR Peak Direction P.M Peak Remaining LOS Volume/Peak Hour/Peak Capacity Direction Direction Project Traffic (1) Packet Pg. 2010 17.H 10/26/2021 Carson Road/9.0 Lake Trafford to B 600/North 54/NB 305 Immokalee Drive I I I Lake Trafford Carson Road to C 247 Road/47.0 S.R. 29 I 1800/East 1128/WB S.R.29 /84.0 South of S.R. 29 B 991 to 9th Street 11,700/West 132/EB S.R. 29 /85.0 9th Street to North D 185 S.R. 29 1900/South 154/SB Westclox Road/116.0 Carson Road to B S.R. 29 I 1800/West 19/WB 1580 Source for P.M. Peak Hour/Peak Direction Project Traffic is April 6, 2021; Traffic Impact Statement provided by the petitioner. Based on the TIS provided by the applicant, and the 2020 AUIR, the subject PUD can be found consistent with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the Growth Management Plan. Transportation Planning staff finds this petition consistent with the GMP. Transportation Planning Staff Condition of Approval: The following note shall be provided on the master plan: No vehicle stacking shall occur on Lake Trafford ROW. All vehicle stacking must occur within the PUD limits. Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME): Environmental review staff has found this project to be consistent with the Conservation & Coastal Management Element (CCME). The project site consists of 20.6 acres of native vegetation. A minimum of 5.15 acres (25%) of native vegetation is required to be preserved. GMP Conclusion: The GMP is the prevailing document to support land use decisions, such as this proposed rezoning. Staff is required to make a recommendation regarding a finding of consistency or inconsistency with the overall GMP as part of the recommendation for approval, approval with conditions, or denial of any rezoning petition. This petition is consistent with the GMP. COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION (CCPC) RECOMMENDATION: The CCPC heard petition PUDZ-PL20200001827 on September 16, 2021, and by a vote of 6 to 0 recommended to forward this petition to the Board with a recommendation of approval with required changes to the PUD as explained below. The CCPC approval was unanimous. There are no letters of opposition with this petition. As such, this petition will be placed on Summary Agenda. The required changes and additions to be added to the PUD by the CCPC include: Add on the master plan and Exhibit F, Transportation Commitment 3.a: No vehicle stacking shall occur on Lake Trafford right-of-way. All vehicle stacking must occur within the PUD boundary. • Add on Exhibit A, COMMERCIAL: C. Prohibited uses: The following commercial (C-1 through C-3) uses are prohibited within the 500-foot radial setback from a public potable water well due to its potential impact to the public water supply: laundromats, dry cleaners, gasoline service stations, fuel pumps and tanks associated with any use, paint stores, automotive services, photofinishing laboratories, automotive vehicle dealers and any use that allows retail fuel sales. Convenience store buildings are allowed. Packet Pg. 2011 17.H 10/26/2021 • Add to Exhibit F, Transportation Commitment 4: Owner will coordinate with the Collier School District to stagger arrival and dismissal times of the PUD's school and child care center with the arrival and dismissal times of the nearby public school. The changes were accepted by staff, and the revisions were added to the Ordinance. LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: This is a site specific rezone from a Rural Agricultural (A) Zoning District to a Mixed -Use Planned Unit Development (MPUD) Zoning District within the Immokalee Area Overlay and the Wellfield Risk Management Special Treatment Overlay Zones W-1 through W-4 for the project to be known as RCMA Immokalee MPUD. The burden falls upon the applicant to prove that the proposed rezone is consistent with all the criteria set forth below. The burden then shifts to the Board of County Commissioners (BCC), should it consider denying the rezone, to determine that such denial would not be arbitrary, discriminatory or unreasonable. This would be accomplished by finding that the proposal does not meet one or more of the listed criteria below. Criteria for MPUD Rezones Ask yourself the following questions. The answers assist you in making a determination for approval or not. 1. Consider: The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer, water, and other utilities. 2. Is there an adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of agreements, contract, or other instruments or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense? Findings and recommendations of this type shall be made only after consultation with the County Attorney. 3. Consider: Conformity of the proposed MPUD with the goals, objectives and policies of the Growth Management Plan. 4. Consider: The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening requirements. 5. Is there an adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the development? Packet Pg. 2012 17.H 10/26/2021 6. Consider: The timing or sequence of development (as proposed) for the purpose of assuring the adequacy of available improvements and facilities, both public and private. 7. Consider: The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion. 8. Consider: Conformity with MPUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the particular case, based on determination that such modifications are justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations. 9. Will the proposed change be consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies and future land use map and the elements of the Growth Management Plan? 10. Will the proposed MPUD Rezone be appropriate considering the existing land use pattern? 11. Would the requested MPUD Rezone result in the possible creation of an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts? 12. Consider: Whether existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the property proposed for change. 13. Consider: Whether changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed amendment necessary. 14. Will the proposed change adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood? 15. Will the proposed change create or excessively increase traffic congestion or create types of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses, because of peak volumes or projected types of vehicular traffic, including activity during construction phases of the development, or otherwise affect public safety? 16. Will the proposed change create a drainage problem? 17. Will the proposed change seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas? 18. Will the proposed change adversely affect property values in the adjacent area? 19. Will the proposed change be a deterrent to the improvement or development of adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations? Packet Pg. 2013 17.H 10/26/2021 20. Consider: Whether the proposed change will constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual owner as contrasted with the public welfare. 21. Are there substantial reasons why the property cannot ("reasonably") be used in accordance with existing zoning? (a "core" question...) 22. Is the change suggested out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the county? 23. Consider: Whether it is impossible to find other adequate sites in the county for the proposed use in districts already permitting such use. 24. Consider: The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site alteration which would be required to make the property usable for any of the range of potential uses under the proposed zoning classification. 25. Consider: The impact of development resulting from the proposed MPUD rezone on the availability of adequate public facilities and services consistent with the levels of service adopted in the Collier County Growth Management Plan and as defined and implemented through the Collier County Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance [Code ch.106, art.II], as amended. 26. Are there other factors, standards, or criteria relating to the MPUD rezone request that the Board of County Commissioners shall deem important in the protection of the public health, safety, and welfare? The BCC must base its decision upon the competent, substantial evidence presented by the written materials supplied to it, including but not limited to the Staff Report, Executive Summary, maps, studies, letters from interested persons and the oral testimony presented at the BCC hearing as these items relate to these criteria. The proposed Ordinance was prepared by the County Attorney's Office. This item has been approved as to form and legality, and requires an affirmative vote of four for Board approval (HFAC) RECOMMENDATION: Staff concurs with the recommendation of the CCPC, which is reflected in the attached Ordinance and recommends that the Board approve the applicant's request to rezone to the MPUD zoning district. Prepared by: Timothy Finn, AICP, Principal Planner, Zoning Division ATTACHMENT(S) 1. Staff Report - RCMA Immokalee PUDZ(PDF) Packet Pg. 2014 17.H 10/26/2021 2. Attachment A - Revised Ordinance (PDF) 3. Attachment B - Affordable Housing Density Bonus Determination (PDF) 4. Attachment C - Immokalee CRA, June 16, 2021 Meeting Approval Recommendation and Vote (PDF) 5. [Linked] Attachment D - Application -Backup Materials (PDF) 6. Attachment E - Hybrid Meeting Waiver (PDF) 7. legal ad - agenda ID 17589 (PDF) Packet Pg. 2015 17.H 10/26/2021 COLLIER COUNTY Board of County Commissioners Item Number: 17.H Doc ID: 17589 Item Summary: This item requires ex parte disclosure be provided by the Commission members. Should a hearing be held on this item, all participants are required to be sworn in. Recommendation to approve Ordinance Number 2004-41, as amended, the Collier County Land Development Code, which established the comprehensive zoning regulations for the unincorporated area of Collier County, Florida, by amending the appropriate zoning atlas map or maps by changing the zoning classification of the herein described real property from a Rural Agricultural (A) Zoning District within the Immokalee Area Overlay and the Wellfield Risk Management Special Treatment Overlay Zones W-1 through W-4 to a Mixed -Use Planned Unit Development (MPUD) Zoning District within the Immokalee Area Overlay and the Wellfield Risk Management Special Treatment Overlay Zones W-1 through W-4 for the project to be known as RCMA Immokalee MPUD, to allow construction of a 250 student childcare center (pre-school), 700 student school, community center and a maximum of 160 multi -family residential dwelling units on property located at the northwest quadrant of Lake Trafford Road and Carson Road, in Section 31, Township 46 South, Range 29 East, consisting of 62.22f acres; and by providing an effective date. [PL20200001827] Meeting Date: 10/26/2021 Prepared by: Title: — Zoning Name: Tim Finn 09/20/2021 9:56 AM Submitted by: Title: — Zoning Name: Mike Bosi 09/20/2021 9:56 AM Approved By: Review: Growth Management Department Lissett DeLaRosa Growth Management Department Completed 09/20/2021 2:51 PM Zoning Ray Bellows Additional Reviewer Completed 09/20/2021 3:57 PM Zoning Mike Bosi Zoning Director Review Completed 09/21/2021 9:16 AM Growth Management Department James C French Growth Management Completed 09/22/2021 10:24 PM Growth Management Department Trinity Scott Transportation Skipped 09/23/2021 11:56 AM County Attorney's Office Heidi Ashton-Cicko Level 2 Attorney of Record Review Completed 10/13/2021 3:18 PM Office of Management and Budget Debra Windsor Level 3 OMB Gatekeeper Review Completed 10/13/2021 3:34 PM County Attorney's Office Jeffrey A. Klatzkow Level 3 County Attorney's Office Review Completed 10/13/2021 4:40 PM Office of Management and Budget Laura Zautcke Additional Reviewer Completed 10/14/2021 9:51 AM Packet Pg. 2016 17.H 10/26/2021 County Manager's Office Board of County Commissioners Amy Patterson Level 4 County Manager Review Geoffrey Willig Meeting Pending Completed 10/20/2021 2:03 PM 10/26/2021 9:00 AM Packet Pg. 2017 17.H.a Cooil ie' r County STAFF REPORT TO: COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: ZONING DIVISION — ZONING SERVICES SECTION GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT HEARING DATE: SEPTEMBER 16, 2021 SUBJECT: PUDZ-PL20200001827; RCMA IMMOKALEE MPUD OWNERS/CONTRACT PURCHASER/AGENT: Owners: Barron Collier Partnership, LLLP 2600 Golden Gate Parkway #200 Naples, FL 34105 Contract Purchaser/Applicant: Redlands Christian Migrant Association, Inc 402 West Main Street Immokalee, FL 34112 REQUESTED ACTION: Agent: D. Wayne Arnold, AICP Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Ray Bonita Springs, FL 34134 The petitioner is requesting that the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) consider an application to rezone property from a Rural Agricultural (A) Zoning District within the Immokalee Area Overlay and the Wellfield Risk Management Special Treatment Overlay Zones W-1 through W-4 to a Mixed -Use Planned Unit Development (MPUD) Zoning District within the Immokalee Area Overlay and the Wellfield Risk Management Special Treatment Overlay Zones W-1 through W-4 for the project to be known as RCMA Immokalee MPUD, to allow construction of a 250 student childcare center (pre-school), 700 student school, community center and a maximum of 160 multi -family residential dwelling units. The subject property is comprised of one parcel and is owned by Barron Collier Partnership, LLLP. GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The subject property is located at the northwest quadrant of Lake Trafford Road and Carson Road, in Section 31, Township 46 South, Range 29 East, Collier County, Florida, consisting of 62.22+/- acres (see location map on page 2). PUDZ-PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee MPUD Page 1 of 15 Revised: September 2, 2021 Packet Pg. 2018 17.H.a PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: This petition seeks to rezone the property to MPUD to allow for the development of a 250-student childcare center (preschool), 700 student school, community center, and a maximum of 160 residential dwelling units. join � mom u �i00 a 4Wag $@NOW�9 ra jai! -!A47, kfi ■ q'11{YiflYflflflflyN � ��Y���� IY N 6L 'IS iS 4IS N Z F N d x a U I Jl J y3 I 7 - I I r PUDZ-PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee MPUD Revised: September 2, 2021 Q— O N 00 d C1 (D CD r�11 C) cv J Q_ N Q Z C a 4] d Q M d M Q V J Page 2 of 15 N a E a U CD 00 LO Packet Pg. 2019 17.H.a SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING: This section of the staff report identifies the land uses, zoning classifications, and maximum approved densities for properties surrounding boundaries of RCMA Immokalee MPUD: North: Undeveloped land, then to the east is developed with single family residential and mobile homes with a zoning designation of Village Residential (VR) District. East: Developed with mobile homes, with a zoning designation of Mobile Home (MH) District, then to the south is developed with a church, with a zoning designation of Public Use (P) District, then to the south is developed with Immokalee Water and Sewer, with a zoning designation of Public Use (P) District, then to the south is developed with Immokalee Fire Control with a zoning designation of Agricultural (A) District then to the south at the northwest corner of Carson Road and Lake Trafford Road is developed commercial with a zoning designation of Commercial Intermediate (C-3) District. To the east of Carson Road (local road) is developed with a water management area with a zoning designation of Harvest for Humanity PUD (2.73 DU/AC), which is approved for single and multifamily, educational/college, water management detention areas, conservation areas, and recreational uses. South: Lake Trafford Road (local road), then developed with single family residential with undeveloped vacant land with a zoning designation of Arrowhead MPUD (4.03 DU/AC) which is approved for single and multi -family residential, open space areas, preserve areas, and commercial areas. West: Undeveloped land, then to the west is developed with Lake Trafford Elementary School with a zoning designation of Agricultural (A) District, then to the north is developed with single family residential with a zoning designation of Liberty Landing RPUD (6.03 DU/AC) which is approved for single and multi -family residential, water management, preserve, and recreational areas. Intentionally blank PUDZ-PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee MPUD Page 3 of 15 Revised: September 2, 2021 Packet Pg. 2020 17.H.a �j � �r��11 '� illillilni 0111 Hill a L_ Subject Property r --m-LaKe Trafford RD.. BusFST E Aerial Photo (Property Appraiser (GIS) GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN (GMP) CONSISTENCY: `T Future Land Use Element (FLUE): The 62.2-acre subject site is designated Urban, Urban Mixed -Use District, Low Residential Subdistrict on the Immokalee Future Land Use Map. It is zoned Agricultural. Urban Mixed -Use District allows both public and private schools as well as residential and community facilities. The applicant is requesting a MPUD with a maximum of 700 students in K-8, 250 student pre-school, 5000 square feet Intermediate Commercial (C-3). The applicant is requesting low density Multi Family housing (up to 160 MF DUs on 63 acres, which is 2.5 DU/A which is consistent with the IAMP). The requested uses are all consistent with the Immokalee Area Master Plan. The project is a unified Mixed Use Planned Unit Development. Although the residential component of the PUD may not be developed by RCMA, it will be developed in a cooperative manner with the intent to have the residential integrated into the school and charter school portion of the PUD. The applicant wants to reduce the buffers due to the cooperative nature of the two uses. The applicant is also requesting an additional deviation. PUDZ-PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee MPUD Page 4 of 15 Revised: September 2, 2021 Packet Pg. 2021 17.H.a Based upon the above analysis, this proposed PUDZ may be deemed consistent with the Immokalee Area Master Plan (IAMP) and the FLUE. Transportation Element: In evaluating this project, staff reviewed the applicant's April 6, 2021 (revised) Traffic Impact Statement for consistency with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the Growth Management Plan (GMP) using the 2020 Annual Update and Inventory Reports (AUIR). Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the GMP states; "The County Commission shall review all rezone petitions, SRA designation applications, conditional use petitions, and proposed amendments to the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) affecting the overall countywide density or intensity of permissible development, with consideration of their impact on the overall County transportation system, and shall not approve any petition or application that would directly access a deficient roadway segment as identified in the current AUIR or if it impacts an adjacent roadway segment that is deficient as identified in the current AUIR, or which significantly impacts a roadway segment or adjacent roadway segment that is currently operating and/or is projected to operate below an adopted Level of Service Standard within the five year AUIR planning period, unless specific mitigating stipulations are also approved. A petition or application has significant impacts if the traffic impact statement reveals that any of the following occur: a. For links (roadway segments) directly accessed by the project where project traffic is equal to or exceeds 2% of the adopted LOS standard service volume; b. For links adjacent to links directly accessed by the project where project traffic is equal to or exceeds 2% of the adopted LOS standard service volume; and c. For all other links the project traffic is considered to be significant up to the point where it is equal to or exceeds 3% of the adopted LOS standard service volume. Mitigating stipulations shall be based upon a mitigation plan prepared by the applicant and submitted as part of the traffic impact statement that addresses the project's significant impacts on all roadways. " Staff finding: According to the TIS provided with this petition the proposed RCMA Immokalee Development will include 160 multi -family residential units, a 700 student K-8 Charter School, a 250 student Day Care and a 5,000 square foot retail center and it will generate a projected total of +/- 424 PM peak hour, 2-way trips on the adjacent roadway segments. The projected trips generated by this development will occur on the following adjacent roadway network links according to the current 2020 AUIR: Roadway/Link # Link PUDZ-PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee MPUD Revised: September 2, 2021 2020 Current Peak AUIR Hour Peak LOS Direction Volume/Peak Direction Projected 2020 P.M Peak Remaining Hour/Peak Capacity Direction Project Traffic (1) Page 5 of 15 Packet Pg. 2022 17.H.a Carson Road/9.0 Lake Trafford Road/47.0 S.R.29 /84.0 S.R. 29 /85.0 Westclox Road/ 116.0 Lake Trafford B 600/North 54/NB 305 to Immokalee Drive Carson Road to C 800/East 128/WB 247 S.R. 29 South of S.R. B 1,700/West 32/EB 991 29 to 9th Street 9th Street to D 900/South 54/SB 185 North S.R. 29 Carson Road to B 800/West 9/WB 580 S.R. 29 t. Source for P.M. Peak How/Peak Direction Project Traffic is April 6, 2021; Traffic Impact Statement provided by the petitioner. Based on the TIS provided by the applicant, and the 2020 AUIR, the subject PUD can be found consistent with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the Growth Management Plan. Transportation Planning staff finds this petition consistent with the GMP. Transportation Planning Staff Condition of Approval: The following note shall be provided on the master plan: No vehicle stacking shall occur on Lake Trafford ROW. All vehicle stacking must occur within the PUD limits. Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME): Environmental review staff has found this project to be consistent with the Conservation & Coastal Management Element (CCME). The project site consists of 20.6 acres of native vegetation. A minimum of 5.15 acres (25%) of native vegetation is required to be preserved. GMP Conclusion: The GMP is the prevailing document to support land use decisions, such as this proposed rezoning. Staff is required to make a recommendation regarding a finding of consistency or inconsistency with the overall GMP as part of the recommendation for approval, approval with conditions, or denial of any rezoning petition. This petition is consistent with the GMP. STAFF ANALYSIS: Applications to rezone to or to amend MPUDs shall be in the form of a MPUD Master Plan of development, along with a list of permitted and accessory uses and a development standards table. The MPUD application shall also include a list of developer commitments and any proposed deviations from the LDC. Staff has completed a comprehensive evaluation of this land use petition, including the criteria upon which a recommendation must be based, specifically noted in LDC Section 10.02.13.B.5, Planning Commission Recommendation (commonly referred to as the "PUD Findings"), and Section 10.02.08.F, Nature of Requirements of Planning Commission PUDZ-PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee MPUD Page 6 of 15 Revised: September 2, 2021 Packet Pg. 2023 17.H.a Report (referred to as "Rezone Findings"), which establish the legal basis to support the CCPC's recommendation. The CCPC uses the aforementioned criteria as the basis for its recommendation to the Board, who in turn use the criteria to support their action on the rezoning or amendment request. An evaluation relative to these subsections is discussed below, under the heading "Zoning Services Analysis." In addition, staff offers the following analyses: Environmental Review: Environmental Planning staff has reviewed the petition to address environmental concerns. The required preserve is 5.15 acres (25% of 20.6 acres); the Master Concept Plan provides for a 5.15 acre preserve onsite. No listed animal species were observed on the property. However, the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC) wildlife data indicates the presence of Black Bear (Ursus americanus floridanus) in the area. A black bear management plan will need to be included at PPL or SDP review. Stiff -leafed wild -pine (Tillandsia fasciculata), listed as a less rare plant, have been observed on the property and will be protected in accordance with LDC 3.04.03. The property is in multiple Wellfield Risk Management Special Treatment Overlay zones (ST/W- 1 through ST/W-4) and must address ground water protection in accordance with LDC Section 3.06.12. The community facility and residential uses listed in the "RCMA Immokalee MPUD Permitted Uses Exhibit A" are allowed uses within the W-1 through W-4 zone. Some commercial uses (i.e., gas stations, car washes, dry cleaners, etc.) have the potential to impact groundwater and surface water. The proposed Commercial and a portion of the Community Facility areas are located within the "Wellhead Protection Area," which is a 500-foot radial setback distance from public potable water wells (Chapter 62-521, Florida Administrative Code). Several potential uses are prohibited within the Wellhead Protection Area, including aboveground storage tanks (Chapter 62-762, F.A.C.), underground storage tanks (Chapter 62-716, F.A.C.), and all discharges of industrial wastewater to groundwater. Pollution Prevention Best Management Practices (BMPs) must be provided at time of PPL or SDP review for those land uses which have the potential to cause impacts to drinking water. Additionally, depending on the proposed use, the applicant may be required to comply with secondary containment of all regulated substances as well as obtaining a Certificate to Operate (CTO) in a Wellfield Program, per LDC 10.04.01, at time of site development. Transportation Review: Transportation Planning staff has reviewed the petition for compliance with the GMP and the LDC and recommends approval. Utilities Review: Public Utilities staff did not review this petition as the property is not within the Collier County Water -Sewer District. Landscape Review: Staff has reviewed the petition for compliance with the LDC and recommends approval of this project. There is 1 deviation pertaining to landscape (see deviation discussion below). The buffer types labeled on the Master Plan are consistent with the Land Development Code. Stormwater Review: Stormwater staff has reviewed the petition for compliance with the GMP and PUDZ-PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee MPUD Page 7 of 15 Revised: September 2, 2021 Packet Pg. 2024 17.H.a the LDC and recommends approval of this project. Affordable Housing Review: Staff has reviewed the petition and had determined that the Affordable Housing Density Bonus is not applicable to the project. (See Attachment B) School District: At this time, there is sufficient capacity within the elementary and middle concurrency service areas and in an adjacent high school concurrency service area of the proposed development. At the time of SDP or platting, the project will be evaluated for school concurrency. Immokalee Community Redevelopment Agency (CRA) — The subject property is located within the Immokalee Community Redevelopment Area and as such the CRA serves as the primary vehicle for community and professional input on petitions. The agent presented the project at the June 16, 2021, CRA Meeting. The CRA Advisory Board supported the project and encouraged continued discussions with Parks and Recreation about athletic fields and the assurance of traffic calming in and out of the school. The CRA Advisory Board passed it by vote of 7-0-1. (See Attachment C) Zoning Services Review: The applicant proposes to rezone 63± acres from the Agricultural Zoning District (ST/W-1 through W-4) to the RCMA Immokalee Mixed Use Planned Unit Development (MPUD) Zoning District to allow a 700 student K-8 School, a 250-student pre-school, 160 multi- family dwelling units, which may include market rate, essential service and/or affordable housing units, and 5,000 square feet of Intermediate Commercial (C-3) uses and associated accessory uses. Access to the educational campus and housing will be from Lake Trafford Road, with a separate access to Carson Road to serve the small commercially designated tract. A majority of the property was previously cleared for agricultural use; however, it is within the Immokalee Urban Area and has water and sewer services available to the property from the Immokalee Water/Sewer District. The mixed -use project as proposed is compatible with the surrounding neighborhood. Lake Trafford Road services a variety of commercial, residential, recreational, and educational uses. The RCMA education facilities proposed are already located in the Immokalee community and serve the local residents. The project provides buffers that will meet or exceed those required by the Land Development Code and are of a scale appropriate for the site and community. The MPUD provides for a significant amount of open space in the form of vegetative preserve, surface water management, and recreational open space associated the proposed educational facilities and residential development. The location of the open space areas provides for natural buffers to adjacent property as well as functional open space for the MPUD. The MPUD will exceed the code required 30% open space for a mixed -use project. The addition of 250-student childcare center, 700 student K-8 school, community center and a maximum of 160 multi -family residential dwelling units will not adversely affect living conditions in the area. Buffers will be provided per the LDC. PUD FINDINGS: LDC Section 10.02.13.13.5 states that, "In support of its recommendation, the CCPC shall make findings as to the PUD Master Plan's compliance with the following criteria in addition to the findings in LDC Section 10.02.08": PUDZ-PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee MPUD Page 8 of 15 Revised: September 2, 2021 Packet Pg. 2025 17.H.a 1. The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer, water, and other utilities. The subject site fronts the north side of Lake Trafford Road near Carson Road. Water and wastewater facilities are located within the right-of-way, and each has enough capacity to serve the proposed RPUD. Stormwater management details will be evaluated at time of SFWMD Environmental Resource Permitting (ERP) and County Site Development Permit (SDP)/Plans and Plat Permit (PPL) permitting. 2. Adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of any proposed agreements, contracts, or other instruments, or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense. Documents submitted with the application, which were reviewed by the County Attorney's Office, demonstrate unified control of the property. 3. Conformity of the proposed Planned Unit Development with the goals, objectives, and policies of the Growth Management Plan (GMP). County staff has reviewed this petition and has offered an analysis of conformity with the relevant goals, objectives, and policies of the GMP within the GMP Consistency portion of this staff report and found it consistent. 4. The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening requirements. As described in the Staff Analysis section of this staff report subsection Landscape Review, staff is of the opinion that the proposed project will be compatible with the surrounding area. The Master Plan proposes the appropriate perimeter landscape buffers. 5. The adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the development. The RPUD is required to provide at least 60% of the gross area for usable open space. No deviation from the open space requirement is being requested, and compliance would be demonstrated at the time of SDP or platting. 6. The timing or sequence of development for the purpose of ensuring the adequacy of available improvements and facilities, both public and private. As noted above, Transportation Planning staff finds this petition consistent with the GMP. Operational impacts will be addressed at time of first development order (SDP or Plat), at which time a new TIS will be required to demonstrate turning movements for all site access PUDZ-PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee MPUD Page 9 of 15 Revised: September 2, 2021 Packet Pg. 2026 17.H.a points. Finally, the project's development must comply with all other applicable concurrency management regulations when development approvals, including but not limited to any plats and or site development plans, are sought. 7. The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion. The area has adequate supporting infrastructure, such as wastewater disposal systems and potable water supplies, to accommodate this project based upon the commitments made by the petitioner, and the fact that adequate public facilities requirements will continuously be addressed when development approvals are sought. 8. Conformity with PUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the particular case, based on determination that such modifications are justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations. Two deviations are proposed in connection with this request to rezone to MPUD. See deviations section of the staff report beginning on page 13. Rezone Findings: LDC Subsection 10.02.081 states, "When pertaining to the rezoning of land, the report and recommendations to the planning commission to the Board of County Commissioners... shall show that the planning commission has studied and considered proposed change in relation to the following when applicable": 1. Whether the proposed change will be consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the Future Land Use Map and the elements of the Growth Management Plan. Comprehensive Planning staff determined the subject petition is consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the FLUM and other elements of the GMP. 2. The existing land use pattern. The existing land use pattern (of the abutting properties) is described in the Surrounding Land Use and Zoning section of this staff report. The proposed use would not change the existing land use patterns of the surrounding properties. 3. The possible creation of an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts. The subject parcel is of sufficient size and therefore will not result in an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts. It is also comparable with expected land uses by virtue of its consistency with the FLUE of the GMP. 4. Whether existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the property proposed for change. As shown on the zoning map included at the beginning of this report, the existing district boundaries are logically drawn. The proposed PUD zoning boundaries follow the property PUDZ-PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee MPUD Page 10 of 15 Revised: September 2, 2021 Packet Pg. 2027 17.H.a ownership boundaries and coincide with the GMP subdistrict boundaries. The zoning map on page 2 of the staff report illustrates the perimeter of the outer boundary of the subject parcel. 5. Whether changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed rezoning necessary. The proposed rezone is not necessary, but it is being requested in compliance with the LDC provisions to seek such changes. It should be noted that the proposed uses are not allowed under the current zoning classification. 6. Whether the proposed change will adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood. Staff is of the opinion that the proposed PUD Rezone is consistent with the County's land use policies that are reflected by the FLUE of the GMP. Development in compliance with the proposed PUD rezone should not adversely impact living conditions in the area. 7. Whether the proposed change will create or excessively increase traffic congestion or create types of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses, because of peak volumes or projected types of vehicular traffic, including activity during construction phases of the development, or otherwise affect public safety. As noted above, Transportation Planning staff finds this petition consistent with the GMP. Operational impacts will be addressed at time of first development order (SDP or Plat). Additionally, the project's development must comply with all other applicable concurrency management regulations when development approvals are sought. 8. Whether the proposed change will create a drainage problem. The proposed MPUD request is not anticipated to create stormwater management problems in the area; provided an environmental resource permit that addresses stormwater best management practices, stormwater pollution prevention, urban stormwater management, on -site stormwater treatment, and attenuation storage is obtained from the South Florida Water Management District. County staff will evaluate the project's stormwater management system, calculations, and design criteria at time of SDP and/or plat review. 9. Whether the proposed change will seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas. The current zoning designation of Rural Agricultural (A) zoning district includes a maximum allowable height for principal uses of 35 feet. The proposed MPUD includes a maximum allowable height of residential buildings of 45 feet zoned and 55 feet actual. The proposed MPUD also eliminates the potential for numerous manufacturing and commercial uses that could impact light and air to adjacent areas. 10. Whether the proposed change will adversely affect property values in the adjacent areas. PUDZ-PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee MPUD Page 11 of 15 Revised: September 2, 2021 Packet Pg. 2028 17.H.a This is a subjective determination based upon anticipated results, which may be internal or external to the subject property. Property valuation is affected by a host of factors including zoning; however, zoning by itself may or may not affect values, since value determination is driven by market value. 11. Whether the proposed change will be a deterrent to the improvement or development of adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations. Properties to the north, east, west, and south are developed, as previously noted. The basic premise underlying all the development standards in the LDC is that sound application, when combined with the site development plan approval process and/or subdivision process, gives reasonable assurance that a change in zoning will not result in deterrence to improvement or development of adjacent property. Therefore, the proposed zoning change should not be a deterrent to the improvement of adjacent properties. 12. Whether the proposed change will constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual owner as contrasting with the public welfare. Because the proposed development complies with the GMP through the proposed amendment, then that constitutes a public policy statement supporting zoning actions when they are consistent with said Comprehensive Plan. In light of this fact, the proposed change does not constitute a grant of special privilege. Consistency with the FLUE is further determined to be a public welfare relationship because actions consistent with plans are in the public interest. 13. Whether there are substantial reasons why the property cannot be used in accordance with existing zoning. The proposed uses and development standards are not permitted, according to the existing classification. 14. Whether the change suggested is out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the County. It is staff s opinion the proposed uses and associated development standards and developer commitments will ensure that the project is not out of scale with the needs of the community. 15. Whether is it impossible to find other adequate sites in the County for the proposed use in districts already permitting such use. The petition was reviewed for compliance with the GMP and the LDC, and staff does not specifically review other sites in conjunction with a specific petition. 16. The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site alteration, which PUDZ-PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee MPUD Page 12 of 15 Revised: September 2, 2021 Packet Pg. 2029 17.H.a would be required to make the property usable for any of the range of potential uses under the proposed zoning classification. Any development anticipated by the PUD Document would require considerable site alteration, and this project will undergo extensive evaluation relative to all federal, state, and local development regulations during the SDP and/or platting processes, and again later as part of the building permit process. 17. The impact of development on the availability of adequate public facilities and services consistent with the levels of service adopted in the Collier County Growth Management Plan and as defined and implemented through the Collier County Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance, as amended. The project will have to meet all applicable criteria set forth in LDC Section 6.02.00 regarding Adequate Public Facilities (APF), and the project will need to be consistent with all applicable goals and objectives of the GMP regarding adequate public facilities, except as may be exempt by federal regulations. This petition has been reviewed by County staff responsible for jurisdictional elements of the GMP as part of the amendment process and those staff persons have concluded that no Level of Service will be adversely impacted with the commitments contained in the PUD Document. The concurrency review for APF is determined at the time of SDP review. The activity proposed by this rezoning will have no impact on public facility adequacy regarding utilities. 18. Such other factors, standards, or criteria that the Board of County Commissioners shall deem important in the protection of the public health, safety, and welfare. To be determined by the Board during its advertised public hearing. DEVIATION DISCUSSION: The petitioner is seeking two deviations from the requirements of the LDC. The deviations are directly extracted from PUD Exhibit E. The petitioner's rationale and staff analysis/recommendation are outlined below. Proposed Deviation #1: (Six-foot chain -link fence) "Deviation #1 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.03.02.G.1.a., "Supplemental Standards", which requires chain link (including wire mesh), and wood fences are prohibited forward of the primary fagade and shall be a minimum of 100 feet from a public right-of-way. If these types of fences face a public or private street, then they shall be screened with an irrigated hedge planted directly in front of the fence on the street side. Plant material shall be a minimum of 3 gallons in size and planted no more than 3 feet on center at time of installation. This plant material must be maintained at no less than three-quarters of the height of the adjacent fence, to instead allow the use of up to a 6-foot-high chain link fence forward of the primary fagade where the chain link fence is screened with an irrigated hedge planting at a minimum of 3 gallons in size and planted no more than 3 feet on center at time of installation directly in front of the fence facing the external right-of-way." PUDZ-PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee MPUD Page 13 of 15 Revised: September 2, 2021 Packet Pg. 2030 Petitioner's Justification: The proposed chain link fencing is proposed to be used to provide needed security for the school campus component of the MPUD. The deviation is consistent with other fences that have been constructed in Collier County for security. Staff Analysis and Recommendation: Staff sees no detrimental effect if this deviation request is approved. Zoning and Development Review staff recommends APPROVAL of this deviation, finding that in compliance with LDC Section 10.02.13.A.3, the petitioner has demonstrated that "the element may be waived without a detrimental effect on the health, safety and welfare of the community," and LDC Section 10.02.13.B.5.h, the petitioner has demonstrated that the deviation is "justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations." Proposed Deviation #2: (15-foot-wide Type B buffer) Deviation #2 seeks relief from LDC Section 4.06.02, "Table 2.4 Table of Buffer Requirements by Land Use Classifications", which provides that where multiple family dwellings are adjacent to a community facility (CF) use a 15-foot-wide Type B Buffer is required for both uses, to instead allow for a single 15-foot-wide Type B Buffer to be installed on the residential tract and will be installed at the time of construction of the residential component of the mixed -use PUD. Petitioner's Justification: The project is a unified Mixed Use Planned Unit Development. Although the residential component of the PUD may not be developed by RCMA, it will be developed in a cooperative manner with the intent to have the residential integrated into the school and charter school portion of the PUD. Two 1 S foot -wide Type B Buffers is excessive given the cooperative nature of the two uses. Until the residential component is developed no buffer is necessary on the CF Tract due to the significant distance from the adjacent property to the west which is Lake Trafford Elementary School and its preserve area. Staff Analysis and Recommendation: Given the intent to integrate the residential into the school portion of the PUD, staff sees no detrimental effect if this deviation request is approved. Zoning and Development Review staff recommends APPROVAL of this deviation, finding that in compliance with LDC Section 10.02.13.A.3, the petitioner has demonstrated that "the element may be waived without a detrimental effect on the health, safety and welfare of the community," and LDC Section 10.02.13.B.5.h, the petitioner has demonstrated that the deviation is "justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations." NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING (NIM): The applicant conducted a NIM on March 30, 2021 at the Immokalee Charter Scool located at 123 N. 4th Street in Immokalee. The meeting commenced at approximately 6:00 p.m. and ended at 6:20 p.m. The applicant's agent explained the request for the proposed PUD Rezone. Wayne Arnold, the agent, conducted a PowerPoint presentation and gave a detailed explanation of the project. The meeting was then opened to attendees for questions. The concerns from the public were if the housing was proposed as market rate or affordable, traffic, the proposed State Road 29 bypass to alleviate traffic on local roads, and the undeveloped open space land immediately to the PUDZ-PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee MPUD Page 14 of 15 Revised: September 2, 2021 Packet Pg. 2031 17.H.a west of the commercial parcel. Wayne Arnold and Jim Banks answered all these public concerns. No commitments were discussed at this NIM meeting. A copy of the NIM materials are included in Attachment D. ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL (EAC) REVIEW: This project does not require Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) review, as this project did not meet the EAC scope of land development project reviews as identified in Section 2-1193 of the Collier County Codes of Laws and Ordinances. COUNTY ATTORNEY OFFICE REVIEW: The County Attorney's Office reviewed this staff report on September 2, 2021. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the CCPC approve Petition PUDA-PL20200001827 subject to the following conditions of approval: 1. The following note shall be provided on the master plan: No vehicle stacking shall occur on Lake Trafford ROW. All vehicle stacking must occur within the PUD limits. 2. Remove commercial (C-1 through C-3) uses that have the potential to impact the public water supply (i.e., laundromats, dry cleaners, gasoline service stations, convenience stores with fuel pumps, pain stores, automotive services, photofinishing laboratories, automotive vehicle dealers and any use that allow retail fuel sales) from the list of allowable uses within the 500-foot radial setback from the public potable well (Wellfield Protection Area). Attachments: A) Proposed Ordinance B) Affordable Housing Density Bonus Determination C) Immokalee CRA, June 16, 2021, Meeting Approval Recommendation and Vote D) Application/Backup Materials E) Hybrid Meeting Waiver PUDZ-PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee MPUD Page 15 of 15 Revised: September 2, 2021 Packet Pg. 2032 17.H.b ORDINANCE NO.2021 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 2004-41, AS AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, WHICH ESTABLISHED THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BY AMENDING THE APPROPRIATE ZONING ATLAS MAP OR MAPS BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY FROM A RURAL AGRICULTURAL (A) ZONING DISTRICT WITHIN THE IMMOKALEE AREA OVERLAY AND THE WELLFIELD RISK MANAGEMENT SPECIAL TREATMENT OVERLAY ZONES W-1 THROUGH W-4 TO A MIXED -USE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (MPUD) ZONING DISTRICT WITHIN THE IMMOKALEE AREA OVERLAY AND THE WELLFIELD RISK MANAGEMENT SPECIAL TREATMENT OVERLAY ZONES W-1 THROUGH W-4 FOR THE PROJECT TO BE KNOWN AS RCMA IMMOKALEE MPUD, TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF A 250 STUDENT CHILDCARE CENTER (PRE-SCHOOL), 700 STUDENT SCHOOL, COMMUNITY CENTER, A MAXIMUM OF 5,000 SQUARE FEET OF PERMITTED AND CONDITIONAL USES IN THE C-1, COMMERCIAL PROFESSIONAL AND GENERAL OFFICE DISTRICT, THROUGH C-3, INTERMEDIATE COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICT AND A MAXIMUM OF 160 MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST QUADRANT OF LAKE TRAFFORD ROAD AND CARSON ROAD, IN SECTION 31, TOWNSHIP 46 SOUTH, RANGE 29 EAST, CONSISTING OF 62.22f ACRES; AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. [PL20200001827] WHEREAS, D. Wayne Arnold, AICP of Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A, representing Redlands Christian Migrant Association, Inc., petitioned the Board of County Commissioners to change the zoning classification of the herein described real property. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that: SECTION ONE: The zoning classification of the herein described real property located in Section 31, Township 46 South, Range 29 East, Collier County, Florida, is changed from Rural Agricultural [21-CPS-02075/1655668/ l ]83 RCMA Immokalee /PL20200001827 Page 1 of 2 9/20/21 Packet Pg. 2033 17.H.b (A) Zoning District within the Immokalee Area Overlay and the Wellfield Risk Management Special Treatment Overlay Zones W-1 through W-4 to a Mixed -Use Planned Unit Development (MPUD) within the Immokalee Area Overlay and the Wellfield Risk Management Special Treatment Overlay Zones W-1 through W-4 for a 62.22f acre project to be known as RCMA Immokalee RPUD, to allow construction of a 250 student childcare center (pre-school), 700 student school, community center, a maximum of 5,000 square feet of permitted and conditional uses in the C-1, Commercial Professional and General Office District, through C-3, Intermediate Commercial Zoning District and a maximum of 160 multi -family residential dwelling units, in accordance with Exhibits A through F attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein. The appropriate zoning atlas map or maps, as described in Ordinance Number 2004-41, as amended, the Collier County Land Development Code, is/are hereby amended accordingly. SECTION TWO: This Ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Department of State. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by super -majority vote of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this day of ATTEST: CRYSTAL K. KINZEL, CLERK , Deputy Clerk Approved as to form and legality: Heidi F. Ashton-Cicko Managing Assistant County Attorney 2021. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA Exhibit A: List of Permitted Uses Exhibit B: Development and Design Standards Exhibit C: Master Concept Plan Exhibit D: Legal Description Exhibit E: Deviations Exhibit F: Development Commitments [2 1 -CPS-02075/1655668/1183 RCMA Immokalee /PL20200001827 Page 2 of 2 9/20/21 Penny Taylor, Chairman Packet Pg. 2034 17.H.b EXHIBIT A RCMA IMMOKALEE MPUD PERMITTED USES A maximum of 700 student K-8 School, a 250-student pre-school, 160 multi -family dwelling units, 7,500 square foot community center and 5,000 square feet of Intermediate Commercial (C-3) uses shall be permitted within the MPUD. The uses are subject to the trip cap identified in Exhibit F, Section 3.a of this PUD. No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or in part, for other than the following: COMMUNITY FACILITY: A. Principal Uses: 1. Childcare centers (8351), up to 250 students 2. Community centers (8322), not to exceed 7,500 square feet 3. Parks and playgrounds, indoor/outdoor recreation facilities, gymnasium, and open space uses 4. Schools, private and parochial schools (8211), up to 700 students 5. Any other principal use, which is comparable in nature with the foregoing list of permitted principal uses, as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals ("BZA") or the Hearing Examiner. B. Accessory Uses: 1. Administrative Offices 2. Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with the principal uses permitted in this MPUD 3. Cafeterias in conjunction with pre-school or private school use 4. Essential public services as permitted in LDC 2.01.03 A. 5. Plazas, event lawn, community gardens, nature trails and similar outdoor areas in conjunction with school or preschool 6. Water management RCMA Immokalee MPUD (PL20200001827) September 16, 2021 Page I of II Packet Pg. 2035 17.H.b 7. Any other accessory use, which is comparable in nature with the foregoing list of permitted principal uses, as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals ("BZA") or the Hearing Examiner. RESIDENTIAL: A. Principal Uses: 1. Dwelling Units: Multi -Family, up to 160 units 2. Model homes / model sales or leasing offices 3. Any other principal use, which is comparable in nature with the foregoing list of permitted principal uses, as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals ("BZA") or the Hearing Examiner. B. Accessory Uses: 1. Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with the principal uses permitted in this MPUD, including but not limited to garages, carports, swimming pools, spas and screen enclosures. 2. Clubhouses, community administrative facilities and indoor and outdoor recreational facilities intended to serve residents and guests, including leasing and construction offices. These are permitted in the Amenity Area. 3. Water management facilities to serve the project such as lakes. 4. Open space uses and structures such as, but not limited to, boardwalks, nature trails, gazebos and picnic areas. 5. Any other accessory and related use that is determined to be comparable in nature with the foregoing uses and consistent with the permitted accessory uses of this MPUD as determined by the BZA or the Hearing Examiner. COMMERCIAL: A. Principal Uses: up to 5,000 square feet 1. All permitted and conditional uses in the C-1 through C-3 Zoning Districts of the Collier County Land Development Code (LDC), Ordinance 04-41, as amended. RCMA Immokalee MPUD (PL20200001827) September 16, 2021 Page 2 of II Packet Pg. 2036 17.H.b 2. Any other principal use, which is comparable in nature with the foregoing list of permitted principal uses, as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals ("BZA") or the Hearing Examiner. B. Accessory Uses: 1. Uses and structures that are accessory and incidental to the permitted uses within this MPUD document. 2. Water management facilities to serve the project such as lakes. 3. Open space uses and structures such as, but not limited to, boardwalks, nature trails, gazebos and picnic areas. 4. Any other accessory and related use that is determined to be comparable in nature with the foregoing uses and consistent with the permitted accessory uses of this MPUD as determined by the BZA or the Hearing Examiner. C. Prohibited Uses: 1. The following commercial (C-1 through C-3) uses are prohibited within the 500-foot radial setback from a public potable water well due to its potential impact to the public water supply: Laundromats, dry cleaners, gasoline service stations, fuel pumps and tanks associated with any use, paint stores, automotive services, photofinishing laboratories, automotive vehicle dealers and any use that allows retail fuel sales. Convenience store buildings are allowed. A. Allowable Uses: 1. Nature trails and boardwalks that do not reduce the amount of required preserve area to be retained. 2. Mitigation for environmental permitting, as per LDC requirements. 3. Passive Recreation areas, as per LDC requirements. 4. Water management and water management structures, as per LDC requirements. N D a as as Y O E E Q U rn Go ti RCMA Immokalee MPUD (PL20200001827) September 16, 2021 Page 3 of II Packet Pg. 2037 17.H.b EXHIBIT B RCMA IMMOKALEE MPUD DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS The table below sets forth the development standards for land uses within the RCMA Immokalee MPUD. Standards not specifically set forth herein shall be those specified in applicable sections of the LDC in effect as of the date of approval of the SDP or subdivision plat. PRINCIPAL STRUCTURES *4 MULTI- FAMILY AMENITY AREA *2 COMMERCIAL COMMUNITY FACILITY Minimum Floor Area per unit 700 SF N/A N/A N/A Minimum Lot Area N/A N/A N/A N/A Minimum Lot Width N/A N/A 60 feet N/A Minimum Lot Depth N/A N/A N/A N/A Minimum Setbacks (External) Lake Trafford ROW N/A 250 feet N/A 100 feet Eastern PUD Boundary N/A N/A 25 feet 100 feet Western PUD Boundary 50 feet 15 feet N/A N/A Northern PUD Boundary 50 feet 50 feet 5 feet 200 feet Southern PUD Boundary N/A N/A 0 / 5 feet *1 N/A Minimum Setbacks (Internal) Private Internal Drives/ROW 10 feet 5 feet N/A 5 feet Lakes (measured from control elevation) 20 feet 20 feet 20 feet 20 feet Preserve 25 feet 25 feet 25 feet 25 feet Minimum Distance Between Buildings 20 feet N/A N/A 20 feet Maximum Building Height Zoned Actual 45 feet 55 feet 25 feet 35 feet 35 feet 45 feet 35 feet 45 feet ACCESSORY STRUCTURES *3, *4 MULTI FAMILY AMENITY AREA *2 COMMERCIAL COMMUNITY FACILITY Minimum Setbacks (External) Lake Trafford ROW 250 feet 250 feet N/A 50 feet Eastern PUD Boundary N/A N/A 15 feet 50 feet Western PUD Boundary 10 feet 15 feet N/A N/A Northern PUD Boundary 25 feet 25 feet 5 feet 50 feet Southern PUD Boundary N/A N/A 0 / 5 feet *1 N/A Minimum Setbacks (Internal) Private Internal Drives/ROW 0 feet 0 feet N/A 0 feet Side Yard N/A N/A N/A N/A Rear Yard N/A N/A N/A N/A Lakes (measured from control elevation) 0 feet 0 feet 0 feet 0 feet Preserve 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet RCMA Immokalee MPUD (PL20200001827) September 16, 2021 Page 4 of II Packet Pg. 2038 17.H.b Minimum Setbacks (External) 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet Minimum Distance Between Buildings *5 0/10 feet N/A N/A N/A Maximum Building Height Zoned 25 feet 25 feet 30 feet 30 feet Actual 30 feet 30 feet 35 feet 35 feet SPS—Same as Principal Structure BH — Building Height (zoned height) *1— 0 feet if commercial tract developed as SDP for adjacent C-3 commercial to the south. *2 — When not located in a residential building within the "R" tract. *3 — Does not apply to passive recreational uses such as trails/pathways. *4 - Community structures such as guardhouses, gatehouses, fences, walls, columns, decorative architectural features, streetscape, passive parks and access control structures shall have no required setback and are permitted throughout the "R" designated areas of the PUD; however such structures shall be located such that they do not cause vehicular stacking into the road right-of-way or create site distance issues for motorists and pedestrians. *5 — Zero feet if attached, 10 feet if detached. Note: nothing in this MPUD Document shall be deemed to approve a deviation from the LDC unless it is expressly stated in a list of deviations. RCMA Immokalee MPUD (PL20200001827) September 16, 2021 Page 5 of II Packet Pg. 2039 N O z IT C� to r_ m Co m Ln ?O DZ r0 C 0 C a W IT m D IT x m � D z A O D m m m � m m D Co T IT m D � O m O O r ZONED:VR USE: UNDEVELOPED s, WIDE TYPE' 15' WIDE TYPE'B'— LANDSCAPE BUFFEfa R PEDESTRIAN / VEHICULAR INTERCONNECT MINIMUM 6-FOOT WIDE LANDSCAPE BUFFER RESERVATION (SEE NOTE #2) + + ` PRESERVE+ L OUTFALL LOCATION (APPROX-7E)-- — — ZONED:VR USE: UNDEVELOPED 15' WIDE TYPE'B' LANDSCAPE BUFFER — ED: VR RESIDENTIA CURRY Ra4D I 17.H.b I GRASS PARKING C F L 20'WIDE TYPED' ZONED:MH WATER LANDSCAPE BUFFER Mi USE: RESIDENTIAL MANAGEMENT/OPEN SPACE / RECREATION AREA PAVED PARKING m 2 ♦ AND DRIVE AISLES pp C E NT WATER nl ZONED:P L N CF MANAGEMENT/ m D CHILD CARE OPEN SPACE / W I CHUR H CHARTER SCHOOL RECREATION T E NT AREA m L N ZONED: A ❑� 15' WIDE TYPE USE: EMS FIRE BULAERSCAPE STA ION #31 WATER MANAGEMENT / OPEN SPACE / RECREATION AREA 20' WIDE TYPED' ��I f f // // •I LANDSCAPI 20' WIDE TYPED' LANDSCAPE BUFFER 10' WIDE TYPE BUFFER ZONED: C- A' LANDSCAPE _ BUFFER USE: CONVENIENCE _ J STORE 'WI DE TYPED'' ] _ LANDSCAPE BUFF— _ _ — IAKB 1RAFFlN2p R(MD (ppUlV/y R49D ImYI) — ZONED: ARROWHEAD MPUD ZONED: ARROWHEAD MPUD USE: PARTIALLY DEVELOPED RESIDENTIAL USE: UNDEVELOPED COMMERCIAL TRACT \ NOTE: NO VEHICLE STACKING SHALL OCCUR ON LAKE TRAFFORD NGHT-OF-WAY. ALL VEHICLE STACKING MUST OCCUR WITHIN THE PUD BOUNDARY. ® DEVIATION AA AMENITY AREA R RESIDENTIAL C COMMERCIAL CF COMMUNITY FACILITY V. Grady Minor and Assppialea. PA, radyMinor 3111N1 Im BI>1 Bn, Bunllu Spl'Ingn.Fl,,Idu 34134 r Civil Engineers cLand Surveyors . Planners . Landscape Architects BImi12 SpFlngc:d 239,94711444 INN Ludwdw'I.'ratlyAlinar. ram 1or1.yer9: 239.690.4380 RCMA IMMOKALEE MPUD EXHIBIT C MASTER PLAN aorEaa REVISED 09/16/2021 Packet Pg. 2040 I 17.H.b I SITE SUMMARY TOTAL SITE AREA: 62.22± ACRE COMMERCIAL (C) 0.44±AC (1%) RESIDENTIAL (R) 9.45± AC (15%) COMMUNITY FACILITY (CF) 47.18± AC (76%) PRESERVE 5.15± AC (8%) RESIDENTIAL: MAXIMUM 160 DWELLING UNITS COMMERCIAL: MAXIMUM 5,000 S.F. OPEN SPACE: REQUIRED: 30% PROVIDED: 30% PRFSFR\/F- REQUIRED: 5.15 ACRES (20.6± ACRES NATIVE VEGETATION X 0.25) PROVIDED: 5.15 ACRES DEVIATIONS (SEE EXHIBIT E 0 LDC SECTION 5.03.02.G.1.A., "SUPPLEMENTAL STANDARDS" 0 LDC SECTION 4.06.02, "TABLE 2.4 TABLE OF BUFFER REQUIREMENTS BY LAND USE CLASSIFICATIONS" NnTFS 1. THIS PLAN IS CONCEPTUAL IN NATURE AND IS SUBJECT TO MINOR MODIFICATION DUE TO AGENCY PERMITTING REQUIREMENTS. 2. PRESERVES MAY BE USED TO SATISFY THE LANDSCAPE BUFFER REQUIREMENTS AFTER EXOTIC VEGETATION REMOVAL IN ACCORDANCE WITH LDC SECTIONS 4.06.02 AND 4.06.05.E.1. SUPPLEMENTAL PLANTINGS WITH NATIVE PLANT MATERIALS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH LDC SECTION 3.05.07. IN ORDER TO MEET THE LDC REQUIREMENTS FOR A TYPE 'B' BUFFER A 6 FOOT WIDE LANDSCAPE BUFFER RESERVATION HAS BEEN IDENTIFIED ON THE MASTER PLAN. IN THE EVENT THAT THE PRESERVE DOES NOT MEET BUFFER REQUIREMENTS AFTER REMOVAL OF EXOTICS AND SUPPLEMENTAL PLANTING WITHIN THE PRESERVE, PLANTINGS WILL BE PROVIDED IN THE 6' WIDE RESERVATION TO MEET THE BUFFER REQUIREMENTS. THE TYPE, SIZE, AND NUMBER OF SUCH PLANTINGS, IF NECESSARY, WILL BE DETERMINED AT TIME OF INITIAL SDP OR PLAT AND INCLUDED ON THE LANDSCAPE PLANS FOR THE SDP OR PLAT. 3. WATER AND SEWER TO BE PROVIDED BY IMMOKALEE WATER AND SEWER DISTRICT. 4. NO VEHICLE STACKING SHALL OCCUR ON LAKE TRAFFORD RIGHT-OF-WAY. ALL VEHICLE STACKING MUST OCCUR WITHIN THE PUD BOUNDARY. RCMA IMMOKALEE MPUD radyMinor Q. e.ady Mlnnr...a,,.���i: rs.r.I. nn coos Bouiin Springs. l-Od 34134 EXHIBIT C DATecMA�r MASTER PLAN NOTES Civil Engineers Land Surveyors . Planners . Landscape Architects F, o-E R f,o of Auth. N:B 0000161 C- of Auth. 1,130005151 Business CC 26000266 xu BIT c M—Ea —N—w` of Bonita Springs: 239.947.1144 a wa.(lrady Woor.com Fort Myers: 239.690.4380 REVISED 09/16/2021 Packet Pg. 2041 17.H.b EXHIBIT D RCMA IMMOKALEE MPUD LEGAL DESCRIPTION THAT PART OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 31, TOWNSHIP 46 SOUTH, RANGE 29 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA, LYING NORTH OF C.R. 890; LESS THE NORTH, EAST, AND WEST 30 FEET THEREOF, LESS LANDS DESCRIBED IN O.R. BOOK 551, PAGE 577; LESS LANDS DESCRIBED IN O.R. BOOK 739, PAGE 675; LESS LANDS DESCRIBED IN O.R. BOOK 770, PAGE 196; LESS LANDS DESCRIBED IN O.R. BOOK 957, PAGE 1736, LESS LANDS DESCRIBED IN O.R. BOOK 2280, PAGE 757; LESS ALL OF CARSON ROAD MOBILE HOME SUBDIVISION, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 31, PAGE 1, LESS CARSON ROAD; AND LESS LAKE TRAFFORD ROAD, ALL RECORDINGS OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. LESS AND EXCEPT: PARCEL 1: A TRACTOR PARCEL OF LAND SITUATED IN THE STATE OF FLORIDA, COLLIER COUNTY, LYING IN SECTION 31, TOWNSHIP 46 SOUTH, RANGE 29 EAST, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTHEAST ONE QUARTER OF SECTION 31; THENCE N00°55'53"W ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 540.33 FEET; THENCE N89°11'40"W FOR 30.02 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, SAID POINT BEING THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF A PARCEL OF LAND DESCRIBED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 739, PAGE 675; THENCE N89°11'40"W ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID PARCEL FOR 200.08' TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID PARCEL; THENCE N00°55'53"W FOR 60.28 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF A PARCEL OF LAND DESCRIBED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 551, PAGE 577; THENCE S89°06'51"E ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL FOR 199.79 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SAID CARSON ROAD; THENCE S00°55'53"E ALONG SAID WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE FOR 60.00' TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. TOTAL CONTAINING 62.22 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. RCMA Immokalee MPUD (PL20200001827) September 16, 2021 Page 8 of II Packet Pg. 2042 17.H.b EXHIBIT E RCMA IMMOKALEE MPUD DEVIATIONS FROM THE LDC DEVIATION 1: Relief from LDC Subsection 5.03.02.G.1.a., Supplemental Standards, which provides chain link (including wire mesh) and wood fences are prohibited forward of the primary fagade and shall be a minimum of 100 feet from a public right-of- way. If these types of fences face a public or private street, then they shall be screened with an irrigated hedge planted directly in front of the fence on the street side. Plant material shall be a minimum of 3 gallons in size and planted no more than 3 feet on center at time of installation. This plant material must be maintained at no less than three-quarters of the height of the adjacent fence, to instead allow the use of up to a 6-foot-high chain link fence forward of the primary fagade where the chain link fence is screened with an irrigated hedge planting directly in front of the fence facing the external right-of-way. DEVIATION 2: Relief from LDC Section 4.06.02, "Table 2.4 Table of Buffer Requirements by Land Use Classifications", which provides that where multiple family dwellings are adjacent to a community facility (CF) use a 15-foot-wide Type B Buffer is required for both uses, to instead allow for a single 15-foot-wide Type B Buffer to be installed on the residential tract and will be installed at the time of construction of the residential component of the mixed -use PUD. RCMA Immokalee MPUD (PL20200001827) September 16, 2021 Page 9 of II Packet Pg. 2043 17.H.b EXHIBIT F RCMA IMMOKALEE MPUD DEVELOPMENT COMMITMENTS PUD MONITORING One entity (hereinafterthe Managing Entity) shall be responsible for PUD monitoring until close-out of the PUD, and this entity shall also be responsible for satisfying all PUD commitments until close-out of the PUD. At the time of this PUD approval, the Managing Entity is Redlands Christian Migrant Association, Inc., 402 W. Main Street, Immokalee, FL 34112. Should the Managing Entity desire to transfer the monitoring and commitments to a successor entity, then it must provide a copy of a legally binding document that needs to be approved for legal sufficiency by the County Attorney. After such approval, the Managing Entity will be released of its obligations upon written approval of the transfer by County staff, and the successor entity shall become the Managing Entity. As Owner and Developer sell off tracts, the Managing Entity shall provide written notice to County that includes an acknowledgement of the commitments required by the PUD by the new owner and the new owner's agreement to comply with the Commitments through the Managing Entity, but the Managing Entity shall not be relieved of its responsibility under this Section. When the PUD is closed -out, then the Managing Entity is no longer responsible for the monitoring and fulfillment of PUD commitments. 2. MISCELLANEOUS Issuance of a development permit by a county does not in any way create any rights on the part of the applicant to obtain a permit from a state or federal agency and does not create any liability on the part of the county for issuance of the permit if the applicant fails to obtain requisite approvals or fulfill the obligations imposed by a state or federal agency or undertakes actions that result in a violation of state or federal law. B. All other applicable state or federal permits must be obtained before commencement of the development. 3. TRANSPORTATION The maximum total daily trip generation for the PUD shall not exceed 424 two-way PM peak hour net trips based on the use codes in the ITE Manual on trip generation rates in effect at the time of application for SDP/SDPA or subdivision plat approval. b. No vehicle stacking shall occur on Lake Trafford right-of-way. All vehicle stacking must occur within the PUD boundary. RCMA Immokalee MPUD (PL20200001827) September 16, 2021 Page 10 of II Packet Pg. 2044 17.H.b c. Owner will coordinate with the Collier School District to stagger arrival and dismissal times of the PUD's school and childcare center with the arrival and dismissal times of the nearby public school. 4. LANDSCAPING a. Preserves may be used to satisfy the landscape buffer requirements after exotic vegetation removal in accordance with LDC sections 4.06.02 and 4.06.05.E.1. Supplemental plantings with native plant materials shall be in accordance with LDC section 3.05.07. In order to meet the LDC requirements for a Type B buffer, a 6-foot wide landscape buffer reservation has been identified on the Master Plan. In the event that the preserve does not meet buffer requirements after removal of exotics and supplemental planting within the preserve, plantings will be provided in the 6- foot wide reservation to meet the buffer requirements. The type, size, and number of such plantings, if necessary, will be determined at time of initial SDP or plat and included on the landscape plans for the SDP or plat. 5. ENVIRONMENTAL a. The MPUD shall be required to preserve 25% of native vegetation. 20.6± acres of native vegetation exist on -site requiring a minimum preservation of 5.15± acres (20.6 X .25 = 5.15). A minimum of 5.15± acres of native vegetation will be retained on -site. b. A management plan for Florida Black Bear and Fox Squirrel shall be submitted for review and approval at time of final plat or SDP for the project, whichever is applicable. RCMA Immokalee MPUD (PL20200001827) September 16, 2021 Page 11 of II Packet Pg. 2045 17.H.c From: LaRowJacob Sent: Wednesday, May 12, 2021 1:39 PM To: FinnTimothy Cc: HalfordHilary Subject: RE: RCMA Immokalee PUDZ PL20200001827 Good Afternoon Mr. Finn: After reviewing the facts of the petition and internal discussion we've determined that the Affordable Housing Density Bonus is not applicable to this project. Thanks! Sincerely, Jacob La Row Manager — Housing, Grant Development and Operations Community and Human Services 3339 Tamiami Trail E Suite 211 Naples, FI 34112 239-252-2399 Jacob. La Row@ col IiercountyfLgov Co er CoH.r�ty Making Our Community Stronger: One life, one home, one project at a time. From: FinnTimothy Sent: Monday, May 10, 2021 9:56 AM To: LaRowJacob Cc: HalfordHilary Subject: RE: RCMA Immokalee PUDZ PL20200001827 Hi Jacob, Just a friendly reminder to please have any comments back on the above petition by this Wednesday. Thank you From: FinnTimothy Sent: Friday, April 23, 2021 11:53 AM To: LaRowJacob <Jacob. La Row@colliercountvfl.gov> Cc: HalfordHilary <Hilary.Halford@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: RE: RCMA Immokalee PUDZ PL20200001827 Hi Jacob, Packet Pg. 2046 17.H.c Per our conversation, please review the attached documents from the Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance (PUDZ) approved last September. From: LaRowJacob <Jacob. La Row@colliercountvfl.gov> Sent: Friday, April 23, 2021 11:11 AM To: FinnTimothy <Timothy.Finn @colliercountyfl.gov> Cc: HalfordHilary <Hilary.Halford@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: RCMA Immokalee PUDZ PL20200001827 Hello Timothy - I just left you long voicemail (apologies) regarding the Subject referenced above. If you have a minute or two today I'd live to be able to discuss the question regarding the Affordable Housing Density Bonus Agreement question that was raised. Sincerely, Jacob La Row Manager— Housing, Grant Development and Operations Community and Human Services 3339 Tamiami Trail E Suite 211 Naples, FI 34112 239-252-2399 Jacob. La Row@ col IiercountyfLgov Z;Q er 4Z0Nrxty Making Our Community Stronger: One life, one home, one project at a time. Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. Packet Pg. 2047 17.H.d FinnTimoth N From: ForesterDebrah o Sent: Wednesday, August 4, 2021 12:13 PM a To: FinnTimothy d Cc: BetancourtChristie 0 Subject: RE: RCMA Immokalee (PUDZ) PL20200001827 E Attachments: DRAFT June 16 2021 CRA Minutes.docx E Q U H Tim, they presented at the June 16 CRA Meeting. The meeting minutes are still in DRAFT form. They won't be presented to the CRA Advisory Board for consideration until September for consideration and approval. (see attached). 00 Below is the motion that was approved per the draft. Let me know if you have any further questions. Thanks so much 0 Action: Mr. Francisco "Frank" Leon made a motion to support the project and encourage the continued discussions with Parks and Recreation about athletic fields and recommend that the assurance of traffic coming in and out of the M school are addressed. Mr. Mark Lemke seconded the motion, Mr. Michael "Mike" Facundo abstained and it passed by o vote. 7-0-1. c m E Best Regards, o Debrah a= 0 0 Phone I Bayshore Office — 239-252-8846 1 Cell:239-285-8270 Q- a Phone Immokalee Office — 239-867-0025 Q a> c From: FinnTimothy<Timothy.Finn@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Monday, August 2, 2021 3:54 PM To: ForesterDebrah <Debrah.Forester@colliercountyfl.gov> o N Cc: Beta ncourtChristie <Christie.Betancourt@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject. FW: RCMA Immokalee (PUDZ) PL20200001827 c 0 Hi Debrah, a Please see below correspondence from February. I don't think the agent, Wayne Arnold scheduled a presentation with the CRA? I'm writing the staff report for the above project and would like to know if the CRA would support this project? Please see attached ordinance and other attachments. o E E From: ForesterDebrah <Debrah.Forester@colliercountyfl.gov> ' Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2021 12:14 PM U c To: FinnTimothy <Timothy.Finn@ col Iiercountyfl.gov>; Beta ncourtChristie <Christie.Betancourt@colIiercountyfI gov> 0 E Cc: SummersEllen <Ellen.Summers colliercount fl. ov> Subject: RE: RCMA Immokalee (PUDZ) PL20200001827 `6 Q Hi Tim, yes the site is in the Immokalee CRA boundaries. They are not required to provide a formal presentation. But we m certainly encourage them to do so. I have copied Christie Betancourt on this email. She can provide meeting dates if the E applicant is interested. Ellen can be dropped from this conversation. Thanks so much. Debrah a Packet Pg. 2048 17.H.d Best Regards, Debrah Phone I Bayshore Office — 239-252-8846 1 Cell:239-285-8270 Phone Immokalee Office — 239-867-0025 From: FinnTimothy Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2021 10:10 AM To: SummersEllen Cc: ForesterDebrah Subject: RCMA Immokalee (PUDZ) PL20200001827 Hi Ellen, Can you verify that the above referenced petition is within the Immokalee Community Redevelopment Agency (CRA)? Does the applicant need to provide a formal presentation to the Immokalee CRA Advisory Board Joint Meeting? Timothy Finn, AICP Principal Planner CAG-r Corny Zoning Division NOTE: New Email Address as of 1210912017: Timothy. FinnCdcolliercounffl. ov 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples Florida 34104 Phone: 239.252.4312 Tell us how we are doing by taking our Zoning Division Survey at http://bit.ly/CoIIierZoning. Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. Packet Pg. 2049 Collier County Community Redevelopment Agency IMMOKALEE CRA i The Place to Call Home! 17.H.d Enclosure I MINUTES Meeting of the Community Redevelopment Area Immokalee Local Redevelopment Advisory Board on June 16, 2021. The Advisory board members, staff, and public appeared virtually and in person. Hybrid Remote Public Meeting Immokalee CRA CareerSource SWFL 750 South 5th Street Immokalee, FL 34142 A. 10 Call to Order. R The meeting was called to order by Dr. Frank Nappo, CRA Chair at 9 Pledge of Allegiance and Prayer Dr. Frank Nappo, CRA Chair, led the Pledge of Allegiance and Pastor Christie Betancourt opened roll Dr. Frank Nappo, Yvar Pierre, Fra "Mike" Facundo, Estil Null (9:18). "Mike" Facundo led was announced for the CRA board. Edward "Ski" Olesky, Michael Andrea Halman. CRA Advisory Committee Members Absent/ 1. Patricia "Anne" Goodnight. Others Present: Bernardo Barnhart, Allan Garcia, Wayne Arnold, Mike Delute, Berneitha McNair, Eduardo Gloria, David Corban, Melanie Schmees, Peggy Rodriguez, Alex Breault, Sarai Murillo, and Commissioner William "Bill" McDaniel. Staff. Debrah Forester, Christie Betancourt, Yvonne Blair, and Monica Acosta. Other Present via Zoom: Barron Moody, Yvonette Merat, Victoria Peters, Dottie Cook, John Tobin, and Silvia Casabianca. Voting Privileges for Board Members via Zoom. Staff announced that one board member was on by Zoom when the meeting started. Action: Mr. Ski Olesky made a motion to allow board members on Zoom voting privileges. Mr. Francisco "Frank" Leon seconded the motion and it passed by unanimous vote. 6-0. E. Approval of Agenda. Staff presented agenda to the board for approval. Action: Mr. Ski Olesky made a motion to approve the agenda as presented. Mr. Mark Lemke seconded the motion and it passed by unanimous vote. 7-0. 1 Packet Pg. 2050 Collier County Community Redevelopment agency 17.H.d IMMOKALEE CRA Enclosure I the Place to Call Home! F. Approval of Consent Agenda. 1. Minutes i. CRA Advisory Board Meeting for April 21, 2021 (Enclosure 1) 2. Budget Reports (Enclosure 2) 3. Community Meetings (Enclosure 3) Action: Mr. Mark Lemke made a motion to approve the Consent Agenda as presented. Mr. Ski Olesky seconded the motion and it passed by unanimous vote. 7-0. G. Announcements. 1. Communications Folder Staff reviewed the communications folder with the oard an bers of the public. The folder contained the public notice for this meet the FDOT Ac ransportation Plan flyer in English and Spanish. 2. Public Comment speaker slips _ CRA staff reiterated the public 3-minute speaker slip policy. The board will give more time if they feel it necessary. 3. Community Presentations i. Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commissiot, Mr. Barron Moody, Regional Administrator, Division 4,17reshwater Fisheries Management with the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission`, addressed the board. He gave an overview of the items that have happened at Lake Trafford Marina, giving credit to collaboration with `several different departments with Cllier County: Parks and Recreation, Pollution Control as well as the Collier County Cormiiission. Other collaborative partners include Florida Gulf Coast University (FGCU) and Big Cypress Basin of South Florida Water ement District. 7bottom include the greater th ifon-dollar project of dredging Lake Trafford that three phases and remove over 6 million yards of mucky material from the e make, after the completion of the dredging FWC stocked the lake with a large rgemouth bass and started numerous planting projects of bull rush plants to help recover diverse native vegetation in the lake. This allowed for tournament fishing to commce with great turnout. Unfortunately, Hurricane Irma caused some significant damage & the habitat conditions in Lake Trafford causing the detection of spawning problems with the bass. The baby fish aren't surviving because of the lack of submersed aquatic vegetation (SAV). They will continue to stock fish at the lake until the habitat conditions get better. Their desired future conditions are increased SAV, increased sunlight penetration, water clarity, vegetation growth, and continued partnership development. All collaborators and the community remain committed to enhancing and recovery of Lake Trafford. *Presentation is attached to the minutes for the record. 2 Packet Pg. 2051 Collier County Community Redevelopment Agency IMMOKALEE CRA I The Place to Call Home! 17.H.d Enclosure 1 H. New Business 1. RCMA — MPUD Rezoning Petition — Lake Trafford (Enclosure 4) Wayne Arnold and Mike Delute with Grady Minor and Associates addressed the board. They gave a brief overview of their proposed plan. They are trying to collaborate with Parks and Recreation to allow for a field use to be able to help the community with recreational facilities. They will have to discuss with Parks and Recreation to see if it is doable. One of the main reasons for RCMA building on this site is that their current building is not big enough and parking is an issue at the Main Street location. They also see a need for affordable housing for their teachers, part of the problem keeping teachers here is the affordability of housing. RCMA has also deeded over part of the land to the fire station nearby. Dr. Frank Nappo asked that each board m<give their thoughts. Mr. Mark Lemke supports the idea; he feeelt it would ,be nice to get more ball fields for the community if possible. e0 ` " Ms. Yvar Pierre supports the idea; RCMA has grown out of their current location and the board has witnessed that over the years. This would be a good addition for the community. Mr. Francisco "Frank" Leon supports the idea; he feels that it is a plus for the community. Mr. Edward "Ski" Olesky reserved his comments; he would rather learn more before he comments on his support. supports the idea; he feels that it will be good for the community and if a letter of then it`ld be given to them. Dr. Fi of the Ms. Andrea Commissioner Willi allow traffic relief. he is working with this project. idea; liirsupports the concept of working with Parks and Recreation the Fire Department had been notified. " McDaniel asked that they make sure the infrastructure as far as roads After much discussion the original motion to support the project was amended to include continued discussions about the ball fields and traffic concerns. *Presentation is attached to the minutes for the record. Packet Pg. 2052 Collier County Community Redevelopment Agency IMMOKALEE CRA I The Ploce to Coll Home! 17.H.d Enclosure 1 Action: Mr. Francisco "Frank" Leon made a motion to support the project and encourage the continued discussions with Parks and Recreation about athletic fields and recommend that the assurance of traffic coming in and out of the school are addressed. Mr. Mark Lemke seconded the motion, Mr. Michael "Mike" Facundo abstained and it passed by vote. 7-0-1. 2. Catholic Charities Proposal (Enclosure 5) Ms. Debrah Forester, CRA Director, addressed the board with enclosure 5. The Catholic Charities, Diocese of Venice, Inc., sent a letter of intent to the CRA to obtain ownership of the property owned on 9th street by the CRA. Along with the letter is the conceptual plan for the property. The development of this site would be a chance for CRA to partner with the Catholic Charities. Mr. Eduardo Gloria, Chief Operating Officer for Catholic Chides, and David Corban, Architect and Principal of Corban Architecture, addressed the board. Catholic Charities has been serving the Immokalee community for over 40 years trying to support the needs of the community of all backgrounds, although the charity has the name Catholic in it, Catholic Charites do not just serve the Catholic community but the community as a whole. Catholic Charities has been developing a vision over the last couple of years with input from supporters of the community, local officials, and more importantly community members of Immokalee. They are proposing to develop the 7 and one-half acres on the southwest corner of Main and 9th Street which can be seen in the draft located on Enclosure 5. The development will include key features such as the expansion of Guadalupe's Social Services which includes: a soup kitchen, pantry, shower area, adult education classes, along with a myriad of other services. It will also have a new urgent care facility, a community room with free Wi-Fi, a classroom for adult education, afterschool programming or outpost for a University such as Florida Gulf Coast University or Florida Southwestern, office space, CRA office space, affordable at market housing, commercial retail space to be located on the front end of West Main Street that can be for restaurants or shops that are already doing business in Immokalee but could also serve as an incubator for upcoming companies or groups that are minority owned and need ne support for a time so that they can get on their feet. They envision a green space in the middle able to host some things like a weekend farmers market, theater in the "green", things that wi mote great community and partnerships between entities here, not just Catholic Charities. This 01 sal includes the acquisition of the CRA parcel that is located on the corner of 9th and Main Stir` The CRA s portion of the site is about 2 acres. The would like to acquire the property ' P Y q P P rtY by purchasrtnership, or through a combination of things that would benefit the community. Dr. Frank Nappo _ , 'that the original thought of acquiring this property was for CRA to build a community center, `��board has seen what can happen in the downturn of the economy, that last one took ten years to recover from. His main concern is selling the property for a project and then ten years from now still seeing a vacant property. He asked if this was a funded project or will they acquire the property then look for funding. Mr. Eduardo Gloria understands Dr. Nappo's concern and appreciates that he is bringing those concerns to their attention. To answer his question on funding, yes, they are very well funded, as an organization they have plenty in their reserves and have the backing of the Diocese of Venice. 4 Packet Pg. 2053 Collier County Community Redevelopment Agency IMMOKALEE CRA I The Place to Call Home! 17.H.d Enclosure 1 They have developed similar type projects over many years and have successfully completed them including the affordable housing part. They are not new to space of development and they are very familiar with how the projects work, they know they have their work cut out for them in order to do this project. They are well funded and are prepared to see this project through. As an added note, they did not originally plan to acquire the CRA property, it was not part of the plan, they have nine acres of property that is next to the Guadalupe Parish. An opportunity came about when a donor approached them with two million dollars to begin looking at this and other donors have stepped up quickly. Without even starting a capital campaign there ire several people willing to step up and support this project already. Commissioner William "Bill" McDaniel doesn't think that the CRA needs to construct another building or manage and maintain it. There are needs for the services that they are proposing. The potential of an urgent care facility in our community is there, this would be a collaborative opportunity seeing that the hospital at Ave Maria has become an arduous task. There is a preliminary interest with the Health Care Network managing the Urgent care facility in collaboration with NCH and Physicians Regional. He likes the project and thinks it would benefit not only the community but the CRA as well with the opportunity for a new home and the community center to host the end MSTU board meetings. There are still many steps to go but he is excited to see the proposA 11 Mr. Michael "Mike" Facundo commented that architecturally he will be biased but it's great to see how they incorporated the use of having open green space in the middle. He likes the concept and thinks the idea of having housing near or even on top of the businesses might be great as well. There is definitely a need for an urgent care facility. The only thing he is unsure of is how to collaborate as a CRA, if it is just selling the land or partner with Catholic Charities, but the concept and proposal are great. CRA has always wanted for Main Street to look a certain way and have presence in that area. This would be a great way to do that. Frank Nappo agreed with Mike, that things need to be worked out on what is more beneficial e CRA as whole and what would be beneficial for the community as well. If the CRA just se land what happens then, he would like to have more discussion on the possibilities. He woul to get every board members' thoughts. Mr. Mark Lemke agrees that selling the land, giving it up, and having no control over what happens is not what he wants to see happen, he would rather the CRA work together with Catholic Charities. He also agrees with Mike that this is an opportunity to start the process of what the CRA has wanted for Main Street all aPg. He likes the idea of having condos over the retail spaces and having it look like what the CRA has envisioned for Main Street. Urgent care is a great idea and collaborating with the Health Care Network is great. Even better if the community can afford it, they won't go to a place that they can't afford. Mr. Eduardo Gloria asked to speak before moving on to the next board member, he thanked Mike and Mark for their feedback. He also wanted all of the board members to know that collaboration with the CRA is a great option. He has seen firsthand that a collaborative project with a CRA board Packet Pg. 2054 Collier County Community Redevelopment Agency IMMOKALEE CRA I The Place to Call Home! 17.H.d Enclosure 1 work. They did this in Miami with a project called Camillus House. They built an 88-million-dollar campus in the Overtown Park West CRA District, they received ten million dollars from the CRA as a gift in partnership for the development of that property. It was about 42 million in public funding which included CDBG, New Market Tax Credit, and surtax money and the rest was private donation in order to get the project done. The community room they built was a resounding success and is the CRA's official meeting spot still to this day. High Schools are able to have their graduation ceremonies there. They only charge a nominal fee for the cleaning of the space, but it is available to the community. He just wants everyone to undergand that what they are offering is an asset for everyone not just Catholic Charities. The idea w has been done, and it works. It is a great partnership with the CRA to have the CRA e ` with Catholic Charities on that site because it adds legitimacy and presence to the entire this point Catholic Charities is open to many different options to be able to work with t aquire the parcel. As for the aspect of the urgent care facility, Catholic Charites ahis to pro' affordable health care to the community, they understand that sometimes people just can't pay,` are several doctors that are willing to come to do the work because they can sign up for a pro gra e this one to have some of their student debt forgiven for giving their time to community like Im lee. It is a win, win, for everyone involved. They want to provide programs and services tha everyone in the community. Housing is another thing that they want to provide for everyone, want to be able to have housing for moderate/high income but not be exclusive to just that, there are so many low income families that need adequate housing as well. If they can stay away from government funding, they can serve everyone regardless of status and income and be in charge of who can live in their homes without restrictions. Ms. Yvar Pierre supports the idea of partnership between the CRA and Catholic Charities. Her concern is for the undocumented people in the community. She would like for the urgent care facility be open to everyone. She also likes the idea of the expansion of Social Services. Mr. Eduardo Gloria expl that his comment about not getting federal money to help with the \`ject would allow them t in anyone t` rdless of status. The expansion of Social Services ething they want, especi or the students they see walking from the Middle School going ho `?Some kind of program for as well. 0, Mr. Francisco "Frank" Leon supports the idea of partnership, he likes the expansion of Social Services, but is concerned about the low-income housing. There is already a development that is going up on Lake Trafford for the same thing, does the housing have to be low-income and rentals. Mr. Eduardo Gloria lained that the majority of the units will be at competitive pricing. They are looking at affordable at market rate. They want to have a mix so that there is balance and so that they can stay true to their mission, which is to provide an on -going service. This is why they don't have real estate transactions. Mr. Edward "Ski" Olesky does not want to sell at this time and would like to discuss more over the options available. 11 Packet Pg. 2055 Collier County Community Redevelopment Agency IMMOKALEE CRA i The Place to Coll Horne! 17.H.d Enclosure Mr. Estil Null agrees with Ski, there needs to be more discussion before deciding on the property Ms. Andrea Halman likes the idea of the green space and keeping the big tree that is there, as for the property, she feels that the CRA should keep it and go into partnership versus just selling it so that the CRA can have a say in what is built. She is concerned with the affordable housing, there are teachers, firefighters, and police officers here that need housing. More thought should be put into that category, and for the people that stay all year long. Thge is lots of housing being developed in Immokalee for low-income already. Dr. Frank Nappo agreed with Estil and Ski, there ne lot more discussion. If the property is sold there would need to be an escape clause th ''6, ath harities doesn't deliver, then the property would come back to the CRA. With theVnforeseen ii ges in the economy, we have 4 to take into consideration all options and discuss, at can be don".":, . Ms. Debrah Forester commented that we do not have all the details wor` t today, but asks the board for their support for staff to enter into negotiations to develop a to et with all of the board members comments to move forward if interested in the partnership wit tholic Charities. If the board supports the idea of continuing the conversation with Catholic Charities, then she can work with the County Managers' Attorney office to come with some terms. There is a process that has to happen and then try to bring that back to the board possibly in September. Dr. Frank Nappo asked that each board member give their thoughts. Mr. Michael "Mike" Facundo agreed that getting the details would help to make a better educated decision. He feels that allowing staff to get the information and terms is a good idea. Mark Lemke _agreed that staff should be involved and learn what we are allowed to do and what options and lity are as well. Pierre agree . t the research is necessary. Mr. Fran "Frank" L ,ti greed that research is the best way. Mr. Edward " le "reed that staff should get the information to be able to decide. Mr. Estill Null agreed `with the research of options. Ms. Andrea Halman agreed. After much discussion the board agreed that it would be a good idea for staff to move forward with negotiations and bring back all options. 7 Packet Pg. 2056 Collier County Community Redevelopment Agency IMMOKALEE CRA 1 The Place to Call Home 17.H.d Enclosure Action: Mr. Michael "Mike" Facundo made a motion to allow staff to move forward with negotiations and a terms sheet. Mr. Francisco "Frank" Leon seconded the motion and it passed by unanimous vote. 8-0. L Old Business'* 1. Immokalee Area Master Plan i. IAMP Policies - LDC Amendments ��` Staff is waiting for responses from the GM up.` ichard Henderlong and his staff will let staff know when the next LDC An*Lent wor will be held. 2. Redevelopment Plan Updates� Staff will be having a workshop on Friday, June 18, to gather all i tion has been collected through surveys and meetings. This information will be used to put t r the goals and then writing the policies for each goal to help draft the Redevelopment Plan. J. Staff Reports 1. Operations Manager Report (Enclosure 6) Ms. Christie Betancourt reviewed the operations manager report, enclosure 6. Mr. David Corban is also the architect for the van Otterloo Campus for the Guadalupe Center and provided updates to that project. They are almost done with the part of the Campus that will house the tutoring and mentoring programs for high school students. It is a gathering space for about 150 people. The plan is to be ready to hold classes by January. The challenges have been getting materials. He can coordinate w ff to hold a hard hat tour for the board members if they are interested. Ms. Debrah Forester took the opportunity to ask for the opinion of the two architects in the room, Mr. David Corban and Mr. Michael "Mike" Facundo, on the vision and cultural excitement of Immokalee in regard to the architectural side of what is being built in Immokalee. It seems that the buildings are more contemporary and seems to be the trend, but do they feel that the cultural side of Immokalee can be incorporated to this style of building, maybe with design or colors? Mr. Michael "Mike" Facundo said that the person that came to his mind was Luis Barragan, a Mexican architect that used bright colors, so it is doable, incorporation of color can help with vibrancy, but you can't just do one style and expect it work in every aspect of the community. The one major factor is the LDC codes. They hinder the architectural side when it comes to color; it is important to take this opportunity now to help update the LDC codes in Immokalee to help make the changes for the future. Mr. David Corban agreed that some of the architecture in Naples is that contemporary that Debrah was talking about, but his projects here in Immokalee he considers more of an updated Florida Style. If you look at what they did for the Shelter in Immokalee, the property is surrounded by residential neighborhoods, rather than do one big building, they broke it down to five buildings for a residential scale. They always try to incorporate the Florida Cracker ideas on building which includes large overhangs, windows that can open, and courtyards. This style was used at both the Packet Pg. 2057 Collier County Community Redevelopment Agency IMMOKALEE CRA i The Place to Call Home! 17.H.d Enclosure Shelter and will be used at the Guadalupe Center. The Guadalupe Center has already started discussing colors for inside and outside of the classrooms. The issue being the LDC codes, it states that you can't use primary colors, so when choosing colors, you have to try and choose the brightest color possible. An example was Zocalo Park, they had to choose the brightest color possible in accordance with the Collier County LDC codes. He agreed with Mike in that Luis Barragdn's use of simple forms and bright colors show that it works and it's not a trend, it's forever. That is one aspect that they try to do in architecture, they stay away from trends and make it something that lasts forever. He feels that you can contemporarily design buildings and still address the cultural part with colors. He also stated that Immokalee is so differ `tat a different architectural standard is needed to accommodate for future buildings..';3 2. Project Manager Report (Enclosure 7) Ms. Yvonne Blair reviewed the project manager; sure 7. Staff is coordinating with Road Maintenance to address the S 5t' and Delawa Street , ection. They will be installing raised RPMs. Agnoli, Barber and Brundage will be preparing a p `` 1 for the design of the Phase III Sidewalk Project on Eustis and West Delaware. A banner was se by the MSTU board and those will be ordered for the new poles on Main Street. The pines ack was relocated by Facilities. Dr. Frank Nappo asked if something could be done about the historical sign at the cemetery on Main Street. He would like to see a nice sign; it is a special place. He feels that its part of the history of Immokalee, a background story would be nice, like a plaque that explains what it is and the historical value. ,He would like some options for that if possible. ` .,.. Ms. Debrah Forester commented that staff could coordinate with Parks or the Museum to see about getting something done. If the CRA board is willing to contribute to getting one, then staff can look into the options. K. Other Agencies 1. Code Enforcement update (Enclosure 8) Staff reviewed the Code Enforcement update, enclosure 8. 2. FDOT updates No update. 3. Collier EDO/Immokalee Culinary Accelerator Ms. Melanie Schmees, Director of Business and Economic Research at the Greater Naples Chamber of Commerce, addressed the board. Ms. Schmees explained that the Chamber has a contract with Collier County, it's a public/private partnership in which the Chamber runs certain Economic Development programs including the Business Retention and Expansion Program. They answer inquiries through the Collier Economic Development Office (EDO) website. They handle New Business Relocations; the website also serves as a point of contact for State Economic Development Organizations and represents the interest of the Business community of Collier County. She works in partnership with the CRA and other organizations within the county to promote growth and economic diversity connecting businesses to resources and making sure that the community stays business friendly to help facilitate growth. She just wants to make sure everyone knows that she is a resource, her colleague, Alex Breault, Director of Work Based Learning, is with her today. They will be meeting with a few companies today. She hopes to be M Packet Pg. 2058 Collier County Community Redevelopment Agency IMMOKALEE CRA i The Place to Call Home! 17.H.d Enclosure 1 in Immokalee at least one day a month and plans to try and attend the CRA meeting as well as the Immokalee Chamber Breakfast meetings. She understands that there are specific needs in this community that don't align with other parts of the county. She thanked everyone for their time, and she looks forward to representing as well integrating herself into the community. 4. Other Agency No other Agency updates. L. Citizens Comments. Mr. Allan Garcia, CEO of A&R Builders of SWFL Inc., addressed the board, his company is currently building homes in Immokalee. They have homes that are an ' �'�����from 1300 square feet up to 2800 square feet under air. They have two homes going up in the:, , " ahead community. Dr. Frank Nappo asked about the driveways, he notie of ay when he was there that there wasn't any green space because all of the cars that a 4 there. They 't fit in the driveway and were parked on the grass. They have two ROOF ho "re and they wer parked in their driveway, and their residents don't own vehicles. r;•, Mr. Allan Garcia stated that the issue in Arrowhead are the setbacks. They ca' garages, but the size of the house is also an issue in whea, to build athree-car garage they wo eed two parcels to accommodate that size home. Th ue is the garage becomes storage space for bigger families versus the use of the garage for cars. .. Mr. Francisco "Frank" Leon stated that he has seen" ie°worNthahave done, and the foundation work was great. He would recommend the houses that are beA&R. Mr. Allan Garcia stated that they deal in concrete and masonry. Ms. Andrea Halman stated h# originally when Arrowhead opened there was land that had been set aside that were supposed to rking lots to avoid the overcrowding of cars, but with the recession those lots were sold. M. Next Meeting CRA wil meet on August 18, 2021 at 9:00 A.M. at CareerSource SWFL., Conference 1. N. AdjoummMLA, Meeting Adjou d @ 11:42 A.M. 10 Packet Pg. 2059 17.H.f Cof lie-r County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliercountvfl.gov 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Hybrid Virtual Quasi -Judicial Public Hearing Waiver For Petition Number(s): Emergency/Executive Order 2020-04 Hearing of the Collier County Planning Commission and Board of County Commissioners PL20200001827 Regarding the above subject petition number(s), Redlands Christian Migrant Association, Inc. (Name of Applicant) elects to proceed during the declared emergency with hybrid virtual public hearings of the Collier County Planning Commission and Board of County Commissioners, and waives the right to contest any procedural irregularity due to the hybrid virtual nature of the public hearing. Name: Isabel Garcia as Executive Director Signature*:(/� EJ Applicant ❑ Legal Counsel to Applicant Date: 8/16/2021 * This form must be signed by either the Applicant (if the applicant is a corporate entity, this must be an officer of the corporate entity) or the legal counsel to the Applicant. Packet Pg. 2060 1-7 �Sq 17.H.g NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE OF INTENT TO CONSIDER AN ORDINANCE Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the Collier County Board of County Commissioners on October 26, 2021, In the Board of County Commissioners Meeting Room, Third Floor, Collier Government Center, 3299 East Tamiami Trail, Naples, FL, to considerthe enactment of a County Ordinance. The meeting will commence at 9-00 A.M. The title of the proposed Ordinance is as follows: AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 2004-41, AS AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, WHICH ESTABLISHED THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BY AMENDING THE APPROPRIATE ZONING ATLAS MAP OR MAPS BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY FROM A RURAL AGRICULTURAL (A) ZONING DISTRICT WITHIN THE IMMOKALEE AREA OVERLAY AND THE WELLFIELD RISK MANAGEMENT SPECIAL TREATMENT OVERLAY ZONES W-1 THROUGH W-4 TO A MIXED -USE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (MPUD) ZONING DISTRICT WITHIN THE IMMOKALEE AREA'OVERLAY AND THE WEII�LFI'ELD RISK MANAGEMENT SPECIAL TREATMENT OVERLAY ZONES W-1 THROUGH W-4 FOR THE .PROJECT TO BE KNOWN AS RCMA IMMOKALEE MPUD, TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF A 250 STUDENT CHILDCARE CENTER (PRE-SCHOOL), 700 STUDENT SCHOOL, COMMUNITY CENTER, A MAXIMUM OF 5,000 SQUARE FEET OF PERMITTED AND CONDITIONAL USES IN THE C-1, COMMERCIAL PROFESSIONAL AND GENERAL OFFICE DISTRICT, THROUGH C-3, INTERMEDIATE COMMERCIAL ZONING DISTRICT AND A MAXIMUM OF 160 MULTI- FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST QUADRANT OF LAKE TRAFFORD ROAD AND CARSON ROAD, IN SECTION 31, TOWNSHIP 46 SOUTH, RANGE 29 EAST, CONSISTING OF 62.22t ACRES; AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. [PL20200001827] I i Westclox s'r 1L . Project Location N %—T ,Lake Trafford RD I z 1 I i A copy of the proposed Ordinance is on file wlth'thO. Clerk to the Board and Is available for Inspection. All interested parties are Invited to attend and be heard. ; NOTE: All persons wishing to speak on any agenda Item must register with the County manager prior to presentation of the agenda Item to be addressed. Individual speakers will be limited to 3 minutes on any item. The selection of any individual to speak on behalf of an organization or group is encouraged. If recognized by the Chairman, a spokesperson for a group or organization may be allotted 10 minutes to speak on an item. Personswishingto have written orgraphic materials included in the Board agenda packets mustsubmit said material a minimum of 3 weeks prior to the respective public hearing. In any case, written materials intended to be considered by the Board shall be submitted to the appropriate County staff a minimum of seven days prior to the public hearing. All materials used in presentations before the Board will become a permanent part of the record. As part of an ongoing Initiative to promote social distancing during the COVID-19 pandemic, the public will have the opportunity to provide public comments remotely, as well as in person, during this proceeding. Individuals who would like to participate remotely, should register anytime afterthe agenda is posted on the County website which is 6 days before the meeting throughthelink provided on the front page of the County website, at www. colliercountvfl.00v. Individuals who register will receive an email in advance of the public hearing detailing how they can participate remotely in this meeting. For additional information about the meeting, please call Geoffrey Willig at 252-8369 or email to GeoffreyWillig@colliercountvfl.gov. Any person who decides to appeal any decision of the Board will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto and therefore, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is based. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Division, located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 101, Naples, FL 34112-5356, (239) 252-8380, at least two days prior to the meeting. Assisted listening devices for the hearing Impaired are available in the Board of County Commissioners Office. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA PENNY TAYLOR, CHAIRMAN CRYSTAL K. KINZEL, CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT & COMPTROLLER By: Teresa Cannon Deputy Clerk (SEAL) ND-GG1073 a 1 N i7 i1 d tv Zr. �[ 8' O V, E b. E M w uO r` mrn O, 00 Z uO M 1` (n 2 o c tl d I3I O R Oq ' m Ia ar R tJ Im N W r C d E Packet Pg. 2061 RCMA Immokalee MPUD (PL20200001827) Application and Supporting Documents Sept. 16, 2021 CCPC Hearing wGradyMinor Civil Engineers • Land Surveyors • Planners • Landscape Architects Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, FL 34134 • 239-947-1144 • engineering@gradyminor.com • www.gradyminor.com GradyMinor Civil Engineers • Land Surveyors • Planners • Landscape Architects January 5, 2021 Mr. Timothy Finn, AICP Collier County Growth Management Department Zoning Division 2800 N Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 RE: Collier County Application for Public Hearing, RCMA Immokalee MPUD Rezone (PL20200001827), Submittal 1 Dear Mr. Finn: A Collier County application for Public Hearing for a Planned Unit Development (PUD) rezone for properties located on the northwest quadrant of Lake Trafford Road and Carson Road is being filed electronically for review. This application proposes to rezone a 63+/- acre parcel to allow a 250-student childcare center, 700 student K-8 charter school, community center and a maximum of 160 multi -family residential dwelling units. Documents filed with submittal 1 include the following: 1. Cover Letter 2. Application for a Public Hearing for PUD Rezone 3. Evaluation Criteria 4. Pre -application meeting notes 5. Affidavit of Authorization 6. Property Ownership Disclosure Form 7. Covenant of Unified Control 8. Addressing Checklist 9. Warranty Deed(s) 10. Boundary Survey 11. Aerial Location Map 12. Environmental Data Requirements 13. Traffic Impact Study Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. Ph. 239-947-1144 Fax. 239-947-0375 3800 Via Del Rey EB 0005151 LB 0005151 LC 26000266 Bonita Springs, FL 34134 www.gradyminor.com Mr. Timothy Finn, AICP RE: Collier County Application for Public Hearing, RCMA Immokalee CFPUD Rezone (PL20200001827), Submittal 1 January 5, 2021 Page 2 of 2 14. Waiver of Historic Survey 15. School Impact Analysis Application 16. PUD Exhibits A-F 17. Deviation Justifications 18. Ordinance 91-072 Please feel free to contact Rich Yovanovich at 435-3535 or me should you have any questions. Sincerely, D. Wayne Arnold, AICP c: Redlands Christian Migrant Association, Inc. GradyMinor File (RCMALT) CoAr County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliercounty.gov 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Application for a Public Hearing for PUD Rezone, Amendment to PUD of PUD to PUD Rezone PETITION NO PROJECT NAME To be completed by staff DATE PROCESSED ❑■ PUD Rezone (PUDZ): LDC subsection 10.02.13 A.-F., Ch. 3 G. 1 of the Administrative Code ❑ Amendment to PUD (PUDA): LDC subsection 10.02.13 E. and Ch. 3 G. 2 of the Administrative Code ❑ PUD to PUD Rezone (PUDR): LDC subsection 10.02.13 A.-F. APPLICANT CONTACT INFORMATION Name of Property Owner(s): Barron Collier Partnership LLLP Name of Applicant if different than owner: Redlands Christian Migrant Association, Inc. Address: 402 W. Main Street City: Immokalee State: FL ZIP: 34112 Telephone: Cell: E-Mail Address: mike@hfarchitects.net Name of Agent: D. Wayne Arnold, AICP Firm: Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. Address: 3800 Via Del Rey Telephone: 239.947.1144 Fax: City: Bonita Springs state: FL Cell: Fax: E-Mail Address: warnold@gradyminor.com ZIP: 34134 Be aware that Collier County has lobbyist regulations. Guide yourself accordingly and ensure that you are in compliance with these regulations. March 4, 2020 Page 1 of 11 CoAr County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliercounty.gov 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 REZONE REQUEST This application is requesting a rezone from: A (sTiw-1 through sTiw-4) Zoning district(s) to the RCMA Immokalee MPUD zoning district(s). Present Use of the Property: Undeveloped agricultural land Proposed Use (or range of uses) of the property: Original PUD Name: N.A. Ordinance No.: N.A. PROPERTY INFORMATION On a separate sheet attached to the application, provide a detailed legal description of the property covered by the application: • If the request involves changes to more than one zoning district, the applicant shall include a separate legal description for property involved in each district; • The applicant shall submit 4 copies of a recent survey (completed within the last six months, maximum 1" to 400' scale), if required to do so at the pre -application meeting; and • The applicant is responsible for supplying the correct legal description. If questions arise concerning the legal description, an engineer's certification or sealed survey may be required. Section/Township/Range: sL 46 29 Lot: N.A- Block: N.A. Subdivision: N.A. Metes & Bounds Description: _ Plat Book: N.A. Page #: N.A. Size of Property: 2333 ft. x Property I.D. Number: 00071960001 1158 ft. = 2,710,278 Total Sq. Ft. Acres: 62.2+/- Address/ General Location of Subject Property: Northwest quadrant of Lake Trafford Road and Carson Road PUD District (refer to LDC subsection 2.03.06 Q ❑ Commercial ❑ Residential ❑ Community Facilities ❑■ Mixed Use ❑ Other: ❑ Industrial March 4, 2020 Page 2 of 11 CoAr County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliercounty.gov 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 ADJACENT ZONING AND LAND USE Zoning Land Use N VR Undeveloped and Residential S Arrowhead PUD Residential E MH, P, C-3 and Harvest for Humanity PUD Church, County Utility Site, Convenience Store, Fire Station and Residential W A and Liberty Landing RPUD Lake Trafford Elementary School and Residential If the owner of the subject property owns contiguous property please provide a detailed legal description of the entire contiguous property on a separate sheet attached to the application. Section/Township/Range: N.A. / N.A. / N.A. Lot: N.A. Block: Subdivision: N.A. Plat Book: N.A Page #: N.A. Property I.D. Number: N.A. Metes & Bounds Description: N.A. ASSOCIATIONS Required: List all registered Home Owner Association(s) that could be affected by this petition. Provide additional sheets if necessary. Information can be found on the Board of County Commissioner's website at http://www.colliergov.net/]ndex.aspx?page=774. Name of Homeowner Association: Arrowhead Reserve Property Owners Association, Inc. Mailing Address: 5150 Tamiami Trail N #303 City: Naples State: FL Zip: 34103 Name of Homeowner Association: Jubilation Community Association, Inc. Mailing Address: 4099 Tamiami Trail N #403 City: Naples State: FL Name of Homeowner Association: Liberty Landing Homeowners Association, Inc. Mailing Address: 6704 Lone Oak Boulevard City: Naples State: FL Name of Homeowner Association: Zip: 34103 ZIP: 34109 Mailing Address: City: State: ZIP: Name of Homeowner Association: Mailing Address: City: State: ZIP: March 4, 2020 Page 3 of 11 Co*er Count y COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliercounty.gov EVALUATION CRITERIA 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Pursuant to LDC subsections 10.02.13 B, 10.02.08 F and Chapter 3 G. of the Administrative Code, staff's analysis and recommendation to the Planning Commission, and the Planning Commission's recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners shall be based upon consideration of the applicable criteria. On a separate sheet attached to the application, provide a narrative statement describing the rezone request with specific reference to the criteria below. Include any backup materials and documentation in support of the request. a. The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer, water, and other utilities. b. Adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of any proposed agreements, contract, or other instruments, or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense. Findings and recommendations of this type shall be made only after consultation with the county attorney. C. Conformity of the proposed PUD with the goals, objectives and policies of the Growth Management Plan. (This is to include identifying what Sub -district, policy or other provision allows the requested uses/density, and fully explaining/addressing all criteria or conditions of that Sub -district, policy or other provision.) d. The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening requirements. e. The adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the development. f. The timing or sequence of development for the purpose of assuring the adequacy of available improvements and facilities, both public and private. g. The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion. h. Conformity with PUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the particular case, based on determination that such modifications of justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations. Deed Restrictions: The County is legally precluded from enforcing deed restrictions; however, many communities have adopted such restrictions. You may wish to contact the civic or property owners association in the area for which this use is being requested in order to ascertain whether or not the request is affected by existing deed restrictions. March 4, 2020 Page 4 of 11 CoAr County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliercounty.gov 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Previous land use petitions on the subject property: To your knowledge, has a public hearing been held on this property within the last year? If so, what was the nature of that hearing? No Official Interpretations or Zoning Verifications: To your knowledge, has there been an official interpretation or zoning verification rendered on this property within the last year? ❑ Yes ❑■ No if so please provide copies. PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIREMENTS This land use petition requires a Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM), pursuant to Chapter 3 E. of the Administrative Code and LDC section 10.03.06. Following the NIM, the applicant will submit a written summary and any commitments that have been made at the meeting. Refer to Chapter 8 B. of the Administrative Code for the NIM procedural requirements. Chapter 8 of the Administrative Code requires that the applicant must remove their public hearing advertising sign(s) after final action is taken by the Board of County Commissioners. Based on the Board's final action on this item, please remove all public hearing advertising sign(s) immediately. RECORDING OF DEVELOPER COMMITMENTS Within 30 days of adoption of the Ordinance, the owner or developer (specify name) at their expense shall record in the Public Records of Collier County a Memorandum of Understanding of Developer Commitments or Notice of Developer Commitments that contains the legal description of the property that is the subject of the land use petition and contains each and every commitment of the owner or developer specified in the Ordinance. The Memorandum or Notice shall be in form acceptable to the County and shall comply with the recording requirements of Chapter 695, FS. A recorded copy of the Memorandum or Notice shall be provided to the Collier County Planned Unit Development Monitoring staff within 15 days of recording of said Memorandum or Notice. LDC subsection 10.02.08 D This application will be considered "open" when the determination of "sufficiency" has been made and the application is assigned a petition processing number. The application will be considered "closed" when the petitioner withdraws the application through written notice or ceases to supply necessary information to continue processing or otherwise actively pursue the rezoning, amendment or change, for a period of 6 months. An application deemed "closed" will not receive further processing and an application "closed" through inactivity shall be deemed withdrawn. An application deemed "closed" may be re -opened by submission of a new application, repayment of all application fees and the grant of a determination of "sufficiency". Further review of the request will be subject to the then current code. March 4, 2020 Page 5 of 11 CoAr County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliercounty.gov 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 STATEMENT OF UTILITY PROVISIONS FOR PUD REZONE REQUEST APPLICANT CONTACT INFORMATION Name of Applicant(s): Redlands Christian Migrant Association, Inc. Address: 402 W. Main Street City: Immokalee State: FL Telephone: Cell: E-Mail Address: mike@hfarchitects.net Address of Subject Property (If available): NSA city: Immokalee State: FL ZIP: 34112 ROPERTY INFORMATION Section/Township/Range: 3/ 4/ 29 Lot: N.A. Block: N.A. Subdivision: N.A. Metes & Bounds Description: Fax: Plat Book: N.A. Page #: N.A. Property I.D. Number: 00071960001 ZIP: 34112 TYPE OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL TO BE PROVIDED Check applicable system: a. County Utility System ❑ b. City Utility System ❑ C. Franchised Utility System ❑ Provide Name: Immokalee Sewer and Water District d. Package Treatment Plant ❑ (GPD Capacity): e. Septic System ❑ I TYPE OF WATER SERVICE TO BE PROVIDED I Check applicable system: a. County Utility System ❑ b. City Utility System ❑ C. Franchised Utility System ❑ d. Private System (Well) ❑ Provide Name: Immokalee Sewer and Water District Total Population to be Served: Peak and Average Daily Demands: A. Water -Peak: Average Daily: B. Sewer -Peak: Average Daily: If proposing to be connected to Collier County Regional Water System, please provide the date service is expected to be required: N.A. March 4, 2020 Page 6 of 11 Co*er Count y COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliercounty.gov 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Narrative statement: Provide a brief and concise narrative statement and schematic drawing of sewage treatment process to be used as well as a specific statement regarding the method of affluent and sludge disposal. If percolation ponds are to be used, then percolation data and soil involved shall be provided from tests prepared and certified by a professional engineer. N.A. Collier County Utility Dedication Statement: If the project is located within the service boundaries of Collier County's utility service system, a notarized statement shall be provided agreeing to dedicate the water distribution and sewage collection facilities within the project area to the Collier County Utilities. This shall occur upon completion of the construction of these facilities in accordance with all applicable County ordinances in effect at that time. This statement shall also include an agreement that the applicable system development charges and connection fees will be paid to the County Utilities Division prior to the issuance of building permits by the County. If applicable, the statement shall contain an agreement to dedicate the appropriate utility easements for serving the water and sewer systems. N.A. Statement of Availability Capacity from other Providers: Unless waived or otherwise provided for at the pre -application meeting, if the project is to receive sewer or potable water services from any provider other than the County, a statement from that provider indicating adequate capacity to serve the project shall be provided. March 4, 2020 Page 7 of 11 Co*er Count y COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliercounty.gov (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 COVENANT OF UNIFIED CONTROL The undersigned do hereby swear or affirm that we are the fee simple titleholders and owners of record of property commonly known as (Street address and City, State and Zip Code) and legally described in Exhibit attached hereto. The property described herein is the subject of an application for planned unit development ( PUD) zoning. We hereby designate , legal representative thereof, as the legal representatives of the property and as such, these individuals are authorized to legally bind all owners of the property in the course of seeking the necessary approvals to develop. This authority includes, but is not limited to, the hiring and authorization of agents to assist in the preparation of applications, plans, surveys, and studies necessary to obtain zoning approval on the site. These representatives will remain the only entity to authorize development activity on the property until such time as a new or amended covenant of unified control is delivered to Collier County. The undersigned recognize the following and will be guided accordingly in the pursuit of development of the project: 1. The property will be developed and used in conformity with the approved master plan including all conditions placed on the development and all commitments agreed to by the applicant in connection with the planned unit development rezoning. 2. The legal representative identified herein is responsible for compliance with all terms, conditions, safeguards, and stipulations made at the time of approval of the master plan, even if the property is subsequently sold in whole or in part, unless and until a new or amended covenant of unified control is delivered to and recorded by Collier County. 3. A departure from the provisions of the approved plans or a failure to comply with any requirements, conditions, or safeguards provided for in the planned unit development process will constitute a violation of the Land Development Code. 4. All terms and conditions of the planned unit development approval will be incorporated into covenants and restrictions which run with the land so as to provide notice to subsequent owners that all development activity within the planned unit development must be consistent with those terms and conditions. 5. So long as this covenant is in force, Collier County can, upon the discovery of noncompliance with the terms, safeguards, and conditions of the planned unit development, seek equitable relief as necessary to compel compliance. The County will not issue permits, certificates, or licenses to occupy or use any part of the planned unit development and the County may stop ongoing construction activity until the project is brought into compliance with all terms, conditions and safeguards of the planned unit development. Owner Printed Name STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER Owner Printed Name The foregoing instrument was acknowleged before me by means of ❑physical presence or❑online notarization this day of , 20_, by (printed name of owner or qualifier) Such person(s) Notary Public must check applicable box: ❑Are personally known to me ❑Has produced a current drivers license ❑Has produced as identification. Notary Seal Notary Signature: March 4, 2020 Page 8 of 11 Co*er Count y COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliercounty.gov Final Submittal Requirement Checklist for: ❑ PUD Rezone- Ch. 3 G. 1 of the Administrative Code ❑ Amendment to PUD- Ch. 3 G. 2 of the Administrative Code ❑ PUD to PUD Rezone- Ch. 3 G. 1 of the Administrative Code 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 The following Submittal Requirement checklist is to be utilized during the Pre -Application Meeting and at time of application submittal. At final submittal, the checklist is to be completed and submitted with an up-to-date application. Please provide the submittal items in the exact order listed below, with cover sheets attached to each section. Incomplete submittals will not be accepted. A Model PUD Document is available online at http://www.colliercountyfl.gov/Home/ShowDocument?id=76983. REQUIREMENTS COPIES REQUIRED NOT REQUIRED Cover Letter with Narrative Statement including a detailed description of why amendment is necessary 1 0 ❑ Completed Application with required attachments (download latest version) 1 Pre -application meeting notes 1 ❑ ❑ Affidavit of Authorization, signed and notarized 1 Property Ownership Disclosure Form 1 Notarized and completed Covenant of Unified Control 1 Completed Addressing Checklist 1 Warranty Deed(s) 1 x❑ ❑ List Identifying Owner and all parties of corporation 1 0 ❑ Signed and sealed Boundary Survey 1 0 ❑ Architectural Rendering of proposed structures 1 ❑ ❑ Current Aerial Photographs (available from Property Appraiser) with project boundary and, if vegetated, FLUCFCS Codes with legend included on aerial. 1 ❑ ❑ Statement of Utility Provisions 1 ❑ ❑ Environmental Data Requirements pursuant to LDC section 3.08.00 1 0 ❑ Environmental Data Requirements collated into a single Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) packet at time of public hearings. Coordinate with project planner at time of public hearings. ❑ ❑ ❑ Listed or Protected Species survey, less than 12 months old. Include copies of previous surveys. 1 0 ❑ Traffic Impact Study 1 0 ❑ Historical Survey 1 0 ❑ School Impact Analysis Application, if applicable 1 0 ❑ Electronic copy of all required documents 1 ❑ ❑ Completed Exhibits A-F (see below for additional information)' ❑ 0 ❑ List of requested deviations from the LDC with justification for each (this document is separate from Exhibit E) ❑ 0 ❑ Checklist continues on next page March 4, 2020 Page 9 of 11 CoAr County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliercounty.gov 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Revised Conceptual Master Site Plan 24" x 36"and One 8 %" x 11" copy ❑ ❑ ❑ Original PUD document/ordinance, and Master Plan 24" x 36" — Only if Amending the PUD ❑ ❑ 0 Revised PUD document with changes crossed thru & underlined 1 ❑ 0 Copy of Official Interpretation and/or Zoning Verification 1 ❑ 0 *If located in Immokalee or seeking affordable housing, include an additional set of each submittal requirement 'The following exhibits are to be completed on a separate document and attached to the application packet: Exhibit A: List of Permitted Uses Exhibit B: Development Standards Exhibit C: Master Plan- See Chapter 3 E. 1. of the Administrative Code Exhibit D: Legal Description Exhibit E: List of Requested LDC Deviations and justification for each Exhibit F: List of Development Commitments If located in RFMU (Rural Fringe Mixed Use) Receiving Land Areas Pursuant to LDC subsection 2.03.08.A.2.a.2.(b.)i.c., the applicant must contact the Florida Forest Service at 239- 690-3500 for information regarding "Wildfire Mitigation & Prevention Plan." PLANNERS — INDICATE IF THE PETITION NEEDS TO BE ROUTED TO THE FOLLOWING REVIEWERS: El School District (Residential Components): Amy Lockheart El conservancy of SWFL: Nichole Johnson ❑ Utilities Engineering: Eric Fey ❑ Parks and Recreation: Barry Williams (Director) ❑ Emergency Management: Dan Summers ❑■ Immokalee Water/Sewer District: ❑ City of Naples: Robin Singer, Planning Director ❑ Other: ❑ I City of Naples Utilities ❑ Other: ASSOCIATED FEES FOR APPLICATION X Pre -Application Meeting: $500.00 X PUD Rezone: $10,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre PUD to PUD Rezone: $8,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre PUD Amendment: $6,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre X Comprehensive Planning Consistency Review: $2,250.00 X Environmental Data Requirements -EIS Packet (submittal determined at pre -application meeting): $2,500.00 Listed or Protected Species Review (when an EIS is not required): $1,000.00 X Transportation Review Fees: c Methodology Review: $500.00 *Additional fees to be determined at Methodology Meeting. o Minor Study Review: $750.00 o Major Study Review $1,500.00 March 4, 2020 Page 10 of 11 Co*er County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliercounty.gov Legal Advertising Fees: cX CCPC: $1,125.00 X BCC: $500.00 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 School Concurrency Fee, if applicable: o Mitigation Fees, if application, to be determined by the School District in coordination with the County Fire Code Plans Review Fees are not listed, but are collected at the time of application submission and those fees are set forth by the Authority having jurisdiction. The Land Development Code requires Neighborhood Notification mailers for Applications headed to hearing, and this fee is collected prior to hearing. All checks payable to: Board of County Commissioners. As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is included in this submittal package. I understand that failure to include all necessary submittal information may result in the delay of processing this petition. *Additional fee for the 5t' and subsequent re -submittal will be accessed at 20% of the original fee. April 9, 2021 Signature of Petitioner or Agent Date D. Wayne Arnold, AICP Printed named of signing party March 4, 2020 Page 11 of 11 RCMA Immokalee MPUD (PL20200000546) Evaluation Criteria Pursuant to LDC subsections 10.02.13 B, 10.02.08 F and Chapter 3 G. of the Administrative Code, staff's analysis and recommendation to the Planning Commission, and the Planning Commission's recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners shall be based upon consideration of the applicable criteria. Narrative Statement Describing Request This application proposes to rezone 63± acres from the Agricultural Zoning District (ST/W-1 through W- 4) to the RCMA Immokalee Mixed Use Planned Unit Development (MPUD) Zoning District to allow a 700 student K-8 Charter School, a 250-student pre-school, 160 multi -family dwelling units, which may include market rate, essential service and/or affordable housing units, and 5,000 square feet of Intermediate Commercial (C-3) uses and associated accessory uses. Access to the educational campus and housing will be from Lake Trafford Road, with a separate access to Carson Road to serve the small commercially designated tract. A conceptual master plan has been developed which depicts the general layout of the proposed campus including the location of the residential, educational commercial and recreation/open space areas. The subject property is located primarily in the High Residential Subdistrict with approximately two- thirds of acre of the property located within the Commerce Center -Mixed Use Subdistrict of the Immokalee Area Master Plan. The entire property is presently zoned A, Agriculture with the ST/W-1 through W-4 (wellfield protection overlay). PUD Rezone Considerations (LDC Section 10.02.13.13) a. The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer, water, and other utilities. The property is well -suited to be developed as the RCMA campus. A majority of the property was previously cleared for agricultural use; however, it is within the Immokalee Urban Area and has water and sewer services available to the property from the Immokalee Water/Sewer District. There are no current or anticipated level of service issues related to water/sewer. A traffic analysis has also been prepared which indicates that Lake Trafford Road will continue to operate at an acceptable level of service at build -out of the MPUD. Adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of any proposed agreements, contract, or other instruments, or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense. Findings and recommendations of this type shall be made only after consultation with the county attorney. March 31, 2021 Page 1 of 8 RCMALT Evaluation Criteria-rl.docx GradyN inor Chril Engineers • Land Surveyors • Planners • Landscape Architects Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, FL 34134 • 239-947-1144 • engineering@gradyminor.com • www.gradyminor.com The entirety of the property is under the unified control of Barron Collier Partnership, LLLP and under contract by the applicant, Redlands Christian Migrant Association, Inc. c. Conformity of the proposed PUD with the goals, objectives and policies of the Growth Management Plan. (This is to include identifying what Sub -district, policy or other provision allows the requested uses/density, and fully explaining/addressing all criteria or conditions of that Sub -district, policy or other provision.) The proposed MPUD is consistent with the Immokalee Area Master Plan (IAMP). The property is located within both the High Residential Subdistrict and the Commerce Center - Mixed Use Subdistrict. The High Residential Subdistrict permits multi -family residential development at a maximum density of 8 dwelling units per acre. The proposed 160 dwelling units equates to a density of approximately 2.6 dwelling units per acre. The .66+/- acre commercial tract was excluded from the acreage utilized in the density calculation. The proposed residential density is well within the maximum permissible base density of 8 dwelling units per acre. The non-residential educational uses are also consistent with the IAMP. The IAMP permits uses such as public and private schools, day care centers, and recreational uses as permitted uses within all of the Residential land use designations in the IAMP. The two small commercial tracts are located within the Commerce Center -Mixed Use land use designation. This land use designation permits a variety of commercial land uses ranging from C-1 through C-4 levels of intensity. The MPUD permits C-3 commercial land uses which is consistent with this future land use category. Policy 1.1.3 requires coordination regarding the timing, intensity and design of development to insure that adequate public facilities are available to service the proposed land uses. The project is subject to concurrency and no facility inadequacies are present or anticipated. Policy 1.1.4 emphasizes land use transition between land uses. The proposed multi -family dwelling units are separated from the nearest residences to the northwest by a vegetative preserve and natural buffer providing a large building separation. The multi -family dwellings are separated from the nearest single-family residences to the south by a wetland preserve and Lake Trafford Road. The commercial tracts are located adjacent to existing C-3 zoned property which include an Immokalee Fire Control District station and convenience store; therefore, no transition is necessary. Policy 1.4.3 encourages pedestrian friendly design for projects located within the Immokalee Urban Area. The proposed mixed -use project will provide internal sidewalks and pathways to link the various educational, residential and open space areas within the project. Sidewalk connections will be provided to the sidewalk that currently exists within the Lake Trafford Road ROW. Page 2 of 8 Objective 3.1 of the IAMP provides for the protection of natural resources within the Immokalee Urban Area. A majority of the property has been previously been cleared and utilized for cattle grazing. There are two vegetative areas on the property located near the southwest and southeast boundaries of the property adjacent to Lake Trafford Road. A complete environmental assessment has been prepared and is included in the MPUD application materials. The Land Development Code requires that mixed use project provide 25% preservation of the existing on -site native vegetation. The minimum preserve area that will be provided on -site will be 5.8 acres. The site also falls within the ST overlay for the wellfield protection zones. None of the proposed uses are prohibited within the protection zones and all development will be in compliance with Section 3.06 of the Land Development Code which establishes the standards for all development within the zones. OBJECTIVE 7.1: Direct incompatible land uses away from listed animal species and their habitats. (The County relies on the listing process of State and Federal agencies to identify species that require special protection because of their endangered, threatened, or species of special concern status. Listed animal species are those species that the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission has designated as endangered, threatened, or species of special concern, in accordance with Rules 68A-27.003, 68A-27.004, and 68A-27.005, F.A.C. and those species designated by various federal agencies as Endangered and Threatened species published in 50 CFR 17.) A brief examination of the parcel found no listed animals on site. However, Black bears are known to inhabit these areas. The site does provide some functional habitat for small, medium mammals and birds. A listed species study was conducted and attached. This project site is not in a panther consultation zone. During the Environmental Resource Permit process this project will be reviewed by the appropriate regulatory agencies. This project meets the Objective of CCME Objective 7.1. All proposed impacts are being directed towards the already cleared pasture areas. The majority of the areas that still have native habitat are proposed as preserve. d. The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening requirements. The mixed -use project as proposed is compatible with the surrounding neighborhood. Lake Trafford Road services a variety of commercial, residential, recreational and educational uses. The RCMA education facilities proposed are already located in the Immokalee community and serve the local residents. The project provides buffers that will meet or exceed those required by the Land Development Code and are of a scale appropriate for the site and community. Page 3 of 8 e. The adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the development. The MPUD provides for a significant amount of open space in the form of vegetative preserve, surface water management, and recreational open space associated the proposed educational facilities and residential development. The location of the open space areas provides for natural buffers to adjacent property as well as functional open space for the MPUD. The MPUD will exceed the code required 30% open space for a mixed - use project. f. The timing or sequence of development for the purpose of assuring the adequacy of available improvements and facilities, both public and private. The project will be required to meet local concurrency requirements for infrastructure. No existing or future deficiencies are anticipated. g. The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion. The MPUD as designed provides for internal expansion of the facilities if needed; however, there is not anticipated to expand beyond the 63 acres included in the MPUD. h. Conformity with PUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the particular case, based on determination that such modifications of justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations. The MPUD conforms with the requirements for a PUD. There are proposed deviations from the Land Development Code requested as part of the rezoning application which are warranted given the proposed uses. Justifications for these limited deviations are included in the application materials. LDC Section 10.02.08 F - Requirements for Amendments to the Official Zoning Atlas F. Nature of requirements of Planning Com m 6sion report. When pertaining to the rezoning of land, the report and recommendations of the Planning Commission to the Board of County Commissioners required in LDC section 10.02.08 E shall show that the Planning Commission has studied and considered the proposed change in relation to the following findings, when applicable: 1. Whether the proposed change will be consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies and future land use map and the elements of the Growth Management Plan. The proposed MPUD is consistent with the Immokalee Area Master Plan (TAMP). The property is located within both the High Residential Subdistrict and the Page 4 of 8 Commerce Center -Mixed Use Subdistrict. The High Residential Subdistrict permits multi -family residential development at a maximum density of 8 dwelling units per acre. The proposed 160 dwelling units equates to a density of approximately 2.6 dwelling units per acre. The .66+/- acre commercial tract was excluded from the acreage utilized in the density calculation. The proposed residential density is well within the maximum permissible base density of 8 dwelling units per acre. The non-residential educational uses are also consistent with the TAMP. The IAMP permits uses such as public and private schools, day care centers, and recreational uses as permitted uses within all of the Residential land use designations in the IAMP. The two small commercial tracts are located within the Commerce Center - Mixed Use land use designation. This land use designation permits a variety of commercial land uses ranging from C-1 through C-4 levels of intensity. The MPUD permits C-3 commercial land uses which is consistent with this future land use category. Policy 1.1.3 requires coordination regarding the timing, intensity and design of development to insure that adequate public facilities are available to service the proposed land uses. The project is subject to concurrency and no facility inadequacies are present or anticipated. Policy 1.1.4 emphasizes land use transition between land uses. The proposed multi- family dwelling units are separated from the nearest residences to the northwest by a vegetative preserve and natural buffer providing a large building separation. The multi -family dwellings are separated from the nearest single-family residences to the south by a wetland preserve and Lake Trafford Road. The commercial tracts are located adjacent to existing C-3 zoned property which include an EMS station and convenience store; therefore, no transition is necessary. Policy 1.4.3 encourages pedestrian friendly design for projects located within the Immokalee Urban Area. The proposed mixed -use project will provide internal sidewalks and pathways to link the various educational, residential and open space areas within the project. Sidewalk connections will be provided to the sidewalk that currently exists within the Lake Trafford Road ROW. Objective 3.1 of the IAMP provides for the protection of natural resources within the Immokalee Urban Area. A majority of the property has been previously been cleared and utilized for cattle grazing. There are two vegetative areas on the property located near the southwest and southeast boundaries of the property adjacent to Lake Trafford Road. A complete environmental assessment has been prepared and is included in the MPUD application materials. The Land Development Code requires that mixed use project provide 25% preservation of the existing on -site native vegetation. The minimum preserve area that will be provided on -site will be 5.8 acres. The site also falls within the ST overlay for the Page 5 of 8 wellfield protection zones. None of the proposed uses are prohibited within the protection zones and all development will be in compliance with Section 3.06 of the Land Development Code which establishes the standards for all development within the zones. 2. The existing land use pattern. Adjacent property to the north and south is developed with residential. To the east is a church, Immokalee Water/Sewer District utility site, convenience store, fire station and residential. To the west is Lake Trafford Elementary School and residential development. 3. The possible creation of an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts. Rezoning the property to a PUD does not create an isolated district. The property is of sufficient size to meet the criteria for a PUD rezoning. The PUD rezoning is logical as the property will be developed with a variety of non-residential and residential uses and development standards need to be identified. 4. Whether existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the property proposed for change. The existing Agricultural zoning does not permit the land uses proposed to be developed on the property. The rezoning is required in order to develop the proposed uses. 5. Whether changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed amendment necessary. RCMA has seen increased demand for private schooling in the Immokalee Community. The Lake Trafford Road site will allow RCMA to construct new state of the are educational facilities in a campus atmosphere, with ample room for school growth. 6. Whether the proposed change will adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood. The addition of 250-student childcare center, 700 student K-8 charter school, community center and a maximum of 160 multi -family residential dwelling units will not adversely affect living conditions in the area. Buffers will be provided per the LDC. 7. Whether the proposed change will create or excessively increase traffic congestion or create types of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses, because of Page 6 of 8 peak volumes or projected types of vehicular traffic, including activity during construction phases of the development, or otherwise affect public safety. The traffic analysis prepared in support of the MPUD rezone demonstrates that Lake Trafford Road will continue to operate at acceptable levels of service. 8. Whether the proposed change will create a drainage problem. All proposed improvements will be required to be reviewed by the SFWMD as part of an environmental resource permit, which includes a review of the surface water management system to ensure compliance with approved discharge rates for this drainage basin. 9. Whether the proposed change will seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas. The changes will have no impact to light or air to adjacent areas. 10. Whether the proposed change will adversely affect property values in the adjacent area. The proposed change should have no impact on property values on adjacent property. 11. Whether the proposed change will be a deterrent to the improvement or development of adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations. The proposed addition of community facility, commercial and residential land uses at this location will not be a detriment to improvement or development of adjacent properties. 12. Whether the proposed change will constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual owner as contrasted with the public welfare. All property owners have the right to propose changes that are consistent with the Growth Management Plan. No special privileges are granted by this change. 13. Whether there are substantial reasons why the property cannot be used in accordance with existing zoning. The existing zoning does not permit the proposed variety of uses; therefore, a MPUD rezone is necessary. 14. Whether the change suggested is out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the county. Page 7 of 8 The MPUD is in scale with the community needs and the buildings are arranged on - site to have large setbacks from neighboring properties. 15. Whether it is impossible to find other adequate sites in the county for the proposed use in districts already permitting such use. It is not impossible to find other adequate sites in Collier County for this MPUD; however, this part of Collier County is underserved with the uses proposed. 16. The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site alteration which would be required to make the property usable for any of the range of potential uses under the proposed zoning classification. There are no unique features of the property. Development will require site clearing and filling. Native vegetation retention and open space will be provided as required under the Growth Management Plan and LDC. 17. The impact of development on the availability of adequate public facilities and services consistent with the levels of service adopted in the Collier County Growth Management Plan and as defined and implemented through the Collier County Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance [Code ch. 106, art. II], as amended. There are no deficiencies anticipated with development of this use. 18. Such other factors, standards, or criteria that the Board of County Commissioners shall deem important in the protection of the public health, safety, and welfare. The MPUD contains development standards and commitments, which will insure the protection of the public health, safety and welfare. Water Management Narrative: The proposed stormwater management system will consist of a series of lakes and dry detention areas interconnected to provide attenuation and water quality treatment. The system will discharge to the Lake Trafford Rd swale on the southwest corner of the site. The discharge will be limited to the Immokalee West Urban discharge rate of 0.10 cfs/ac. Building finished floor elevations will be above the FEMA FIRM and 100 yr storm elevations. Parking aisles and perimeter berm will be above the 25 yr storm elevation. The project will construct a swale system along the north and west side of the site to convey any stormwater runoff from adjoining properties around the site to the Lake Trafford Rd swale. Properties to the east drain toward Carson Rd and no swale is needed along that side. Page 8 of 8 Coder Count COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.collieMov.net (239) 252-2400 Pre -Application Meeting Notes Petition Type: PUD Rezone (PUDZ_) Date and Time: Tuesday 10/5/2020 3 : OOPM Assigned Planner: Tim Finn Engineering Manager (for PPL's and FP's): Project Information Project Name: RCMA Immokalee (PUDZ) Pl.#: 20200001827 Property lD #: 00071960001 Project Address: Applicant: Sharon Umpenhour Current Zoning: Agricultural City• lmmokalee State: FL Zip: 34142 Agent Name: D • Wayne Arnold, AICP Phone: 239-947-1144 3800 Via Del Re Bonita Springs, FL 34134 Agent/Firm Address: Y City: State: Zip: Property Owner: Barron Collier P' ship LLLP Please provide the following, if applicable: i. Total Acreage: 14 .7 ii. Proposed # of Residential Units: iii. Proposed Commercial Square Footage: iv. For Amendments, indicate the original petition number: V. If there is an Ordinance or Resolution associated with this project, please indicate the type and number: vi. If the project is within a Plat, provide the name and AR#/PL#: Updated 7/11/2019 Page 1 1 of 5 Coder Count y COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.collierizov.net (239) 252-2400 Meeting Notes North Collier Fire District— most issues to be addressed during site development From the meeting this appears to be a mixed -use occupancy. Please identify this as per the Florida Fire Prevention Code (FFPQ on your submittal. Please also be aware that some occupancies within the FFPC have construction type limitations. If you have any questions or concerns regarding the fire review, please contact Daniel Zunxunegui at (239) 252-2310 or by email at Daniel@northcollierfire.com. i Lr k t c. if- V& g ar ClarkeThomas From: ZunzuneguiDaniel Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 2020 3:35 PM To: AlexandraCasanovaVEN; ThomasClarkeVEN Cc: FinnTimothy; SimmonsLinda; slintz@northcoliierfire.com Subject: PL20200001827 - RCMA Immokalee (PUDZ) Attachments: PL20200001827 - RCMA Immokalee (PUDZ).docx Good Afternoon Alex and Thomas, I believe Tim wanted these pre-app notes sent to you guys. Please see the attached. All the best, Daniel Daniel Zunzunegui Plans Examiner da n iel Ob northcolIierhre. com North Collier Fire Control and Rescue District 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 htt s: northcoIIier€re. corn Direct 239-252-2310 Cell 239-207-0174 Linder Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, d❑ not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. P&- 41+- ClarkeThomas From: FinnTimothy Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2020 4:03 PM To: AlexandraCasanovaVEN; ThomasClarkeVEN Subject: Pre-app - PL20200001827 - RCMA Immokalee (PUDZ) Hi Alex/Thomas, The following is my comment from Zoning: After meeting with flay Bellows it was determined that this petition is an Mixed Use Planned Unit Development (MPUD). Timothy Finn, AICP Principal Planner Zoning Division NOTE: New Email Address as of 1210912017: Timothy.Fin n@colliercountyfIgov 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples Florida 34104 Phone: 239.252.4312 Tell us how we are doing by taking our Zoning Division Survey at http:/1bit.1VJCo1IierZonin&. Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. if you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. F4-4,& ThomasClarkeVEN From: SawyerMichael Sent: Tuesday, October 06, 2020 3:28 PM To: AlexandraCasanovaVEN; ThomasClarkeVEN Cc: EinnTimothy n Z �� y U Z�00's Subject: This afternoons PUD Pre App %' L _ Alex, Please check the TIS required box on the pre app checklist as well as methodology on the next page with a note that methodology will be by email to staff. Please also add the following notes: Transportation Planning: Methodology meeting by email required and provide note on TIS cover sheet that fee will be collected at time of PUD submittal. Address all transportation elements of the GMP. Provide both ITE and SIC use codes in the TIS. Provide trip limit based on TIS using standard language as Transportation Developer Commitment: "The maximum total daily trip generation for the PUD shall not exceed two-way PM peak hour net trips based on the use codes in the ITE Manual on trip generation rates in effect at the time of application for- SDPISDPA or subdivision plat approval. " Please make sure to show stacking for charter school on the master plan as well as pick-up and drop off for day care. Preliminary master plan provided with pre app request appears to have more than adequate space -area for both stacking and pick up -drop off, please show specific location for clarity. Thanks, Michael Sawyer Principal Planner Growth Management Department Transportation Planning 2685 South Horseshoe Drive, Suite 103 Naples, Florida 34104 239-252-2926 michael.saw er u:colIiercount fl. ov Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead. contact this office by telephone or in writing. KI ,c4 Transportation Planning and PUD Monitoring Pre-App Notes Developer Commitments: Transportation Planning "'The maximum total daily trip generation for the PUD shall not exceed two-way PM peak hour net trips based on the use codes in the ITE Manual on trip generation rates in effect at the time of application for SDP/SDPA or subdivision plat approval." Use Codes Provide both ITE and SIC use codes in the TIS. PUD Monitoring "One entity (hereinafter the Managing Entity) shall be responsible for PUD monitoring until close- out of the PUD, and this entity shall also be responsible for satisfying all PUD commitments until close-out of the PUD. At the time of this CPUD approval, the Managing Entity is the Insert Company Name Here. Should the Managing Entity desire to transfer the monitoring and commitments to a successor entity, then it must provide a copy of a legally binding document that needs to be approved for legal sufficiency by the County Attorney. After such approval, the Managing Entity will be released of its obligations upon written approval of the transfer by County staff, and the successor entity shall become the Managing Entity. As Owner and Developer sell off tracts, the Managing Entity shall provide written notice to County that includes an acknowledgement of the commitments required by the CPUD by the new owner and the new owner's agreement to comply with the Commitments through the Managing Entity, but the Managing Entity shall not be relieved of its responsibility under this Section. When the PUD is closed -out, then the Managing Entity is no longer responsible for the monitoring and fulfillment of PUD commitments." Miscellaneous "Pursuant to Section 125.022(5) F.S., issuance of a development permit by a county does not in any way create any rights on the part of the applicant to obtain a permit from a state or federal agency and does not create any liability on the part of the county for issuance of the permit if the applicant fails to obtain requisite approvals or fulfill the obligations imposed by a state or federal agency or undertakes actions that result in a violation of state or federal law. All other applicable state or federal permits must be obtained before commencement of the development." P&- a e P. Go er County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION www.coIIiergov.net Meeting Notes 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34I04 (239) 252-2400 `-> Landscape: Label buffers on the Master Plan. 20' Type D along roads. 15' Type B along all other boundaries. Show the 6wide landscape reservation outside of preserve where a Type B buffer is required. Reference the E' wide landscape reservation in the note regarding preserves counting toward the buffer requirement. Lun,,'• PLC_ �i,�.� w� �Cr. 3 13. ThomasClarkeVEN From: SchmidtCorby Sent: Friday, October 09, 2020 12:S1 PM To: ThomasClarkeVEN Subject: RE: Pre App Notes for RCMA Immokalee (PUDZ) - PL20200001827 Nape Corby Schmidt, A1CP Princip'3l Planner 259.252.2944 Corby. 5chm1dt0co&ef-cou7tyfl. go From: ThomasClarkeVEN <Thomas.Clarke@coIIiercountyfl.gov> Sent: Friday, October 9, 202010:38 AM To: 0rthRichard <Richard.Orth@coIliercountyfl.gov>; SchmidtCorby <Corby.Schmidt@coIIiercountyfl.gov> Cc: AlexandraCasanovaVEN Alexandra.Casanova@colliercountyfl.gov>; FrantzJeremy Jeremy. Frantz@ coIIiercountyfl.gov>; FinnTimothy <Timothy.Finn@coIIiercountyfl.gov> Subject: Pre App Notes for RCMA Immokalee (PUDZ) - PL20200001827 Hi Rick and Corby, ❑o you guys have any notes far the above Pre-App from Tuesday's 10/6 Skype meeting? I was out but saw you attended. Please let me know s❑ I can get the Notes out to Grady Minor et.al. Thanks torn Operations Coordinator - Zoning Division 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, FL 34104 Phone: 239-252-2526 C�Ol ie-r COttmty Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. Pb- 3 A ThomasClarkeVEN From: AlexandraCasanovaVEN Sent: Thursday, October 08, 2020 3:38 PM To: ThomasClarkeVEN Subject: FW: RCMA lmmokalee PUDZ 20200001827 Attachments: PUDZ-PUDA checklist FOR REVIEWERS 2-2017.doc; Environmental data Checklist .doc Please see notes from Craig Respectfully, zaaC64 6"44"4 Operations Coordinator - Zoning Division 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, FL 34104 Phone: 239-252-2558 Alexandra.Casa n ova2 co I I ierco u ntyf I .e ov Tell us how we ore doing by taking our Zoning Division Survey at httP1Ybit.Iv/Co1iier2onina. COIT C014flty Exceeding Expectotions f From: BrownCraig <Craig.Brown@colliercountyfl.gov5 Sent: Wednesday, October 07, 2020 11:57 AM To: AlexandraCasanovaVEN <Alexandra.Casanova@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: RCMA lmmokalee PUDZ 20200001827 Alex, here are my thoughts for this preapplication: ,,, — 4' ,n 1fIz' F - '� ti ��I�'Iz�' ����� �r� FEES $2500.00 Environmental Data. Please provide the Academic Credential for the person(s) that prepared the Environmental Data LDC Section 3.08.00 A.2 Please provide Environmental Data that includes a FLUCFCS map with exotic vegetation percentages, a listed species survey that includes bonneted bat and an exhibit relating to black bear presence. Please indicate the location of wetlands on the property. Please indicate the location of the proposed preserve to be kept onsite ( 25% of native vegetation). Please address compliance with CCME Policies 5.1.1 and 7.1.1. Please provide a narrative to explain the clearing that has occurred, provide permit numbers or historic aerials to explain the clearing of native vegetation. Please address how the proposed development will be in compliance with wellfield protection restrictions see LDC section 3.06.00 . Provide an exhibit to show the projects location in relation to Collier County wellfield protection zones. At First development order review , a phase one soil -ground water assessment will be required in accordance LDC section 3.08.00.A.d.ii See checklist. Craig Brown Senior Environmental Specialist P(;, C. Environmental Data Checklist Project Name RCM Immokalee PUDZ — PL20200001827 The Environmental Data requirements can be found in LDC Section 3.08.00 Provide the EIS fee if PUD or CU. 2. WHO AND WHAT COMPANY PREPARED THE ENVIRONMENTAL DATA REPORT? Preparation of Environmental Data. Environmental Data Submittal Requirements shall be prepared by an individual with academic credentials and experience in the area of environmental sciences or natural resource management. Academic credentials and experience shall be a bachelor's or higher degree in one of the biological sciences with at least two years of ecological or biological professional experience in the State of Florida. Please include revision dates on resubmittals. 3. Identify on a current aerial, the location and acreage of all SFWMD jurisdictional wetlands according to the Florida Land Use Cover and Forms Classification System (FLUCFCS) and include this information on the SDP or final plat construction plans. Wetlands must be verified by the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) or Florida Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) prior to SDP or final plat construction plans approval. For sites in the RFMU district, provide an assessment in accordance with 3.05.07 F and identify on the FLUCFCS map the location of all high quality wetlands (wetlands having functionality scores of at least 0.65 WRAP or 0.7 UMAM) and their location within the proposed development plan. Sites with high quality wetlands must have their functionality scores verified by the SFWMD or DEP prior to first development order approval. Where functionality scores have not been verified by either the SFWMD or DEP, scores must be reviewed and accepted by County staff, consistent with State regulation. 4. Where treated stormwater is allowed to be directed into preserves, show how the criteria in 3,05.07 H. have been met. Provide a wildlife survey for the nests of bald eagle and for listed species known to inhabit biological communities similar to those existing on site. The survey shall be conducted in accordance with the guidelines or recommendations of the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FFWCC) and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). Survey times may be reduced or waived where an initial habitat assessment by the environmental consultant indicates that the likelihood of listed species occurrence is low, as determined by the FFWCC and USFWS. Where an initial habitat assessment by the environmental consultant indicates that the likelihood of listed species occurrence is low, the survey time may be reduced or waived by the County Manager or designee, when the project is not reviewed or technical assistance not provided by the FFWCC and USFWS. Additional survey time may be required if listed species are discovered Provide a survey for listed plants identified in 3.04.03 Wildlife habitat management and monitoring plans in accordance with 3.04.00 shall be required where listed species are utilizing the site or where wildlife habitat management and monitoring plans are required by the FFWCC or USFWS. These plans shall describe how the project directs incompatible land uses away ftom listed species and their habitats. Identify the location of listed species nests, burrows, dens, foraging areas, and the location of any bald eagle nests or nest protection zones on the native vegetation aerial with FLUCFCS overlay for the site. Wildlife habitat management plans shall be included on the SDP or final plat construction plans. Bald eagle management plans are required for sites containing bald eagle nests or nest protection zones, copies of which shall be included on the SDP or final plat construction plans. 8. For sites or portions of sites cleared of native vegetation or in agricultural operation, provide documentation that the parcel(s) were issued a permit to be cleared and are in compliance with the 25 year rezone limitation pursuant to section 10.02.06. For sites permitted to be cleared prior to July 2003, provide documentation that the parcel(s) are in compliance with the 10 year rezone limitation previously identified in the GMP. Criteria defining native vegetation and determining the legality, process and criteria for clearing are found in 3.05.05, 3.05.07 and 10.02.06. 9. Identify on a current aerial the acreage, location and community types of all upland and wetland habitats on the project site, according to the Florida Land Use Cover and Forms Classification System (FLUCFCS), and provide a legend for each of the FLUCFCS Codes identified. Aerials and overlay information must be legible at the scale provided. Provide calculations for the acreage of native vegetation required to be retained on -site. Include the above referenced calculations and aerials on the SDP or final plat construction plans. In a separate report, demonstrate how the preserve selection criteria pursuant to 3.05.07 have been met. Where applicable, include in this report an aerial showing the project boundaries along with any undeveloped land, preserves, natural flowways or other natural land features, located on abutting properties. 10. Include on a separate site plan, the project boundary and the land use designations and overlays for the RLSA, RFMU, ST and ACSC-ST districts. Include this information on the SDP or final plat construction plans. 11. Provide the results of any Environmental Assessments and/or Audits of the property, along with a narrative of the measures needed to remediate if required by FDEP. 12. Soil and/or ground water sampling shall be required at the time of first development order submittal for sites that occupy farm fields (crop fields, cattle dipping ponds, chemical mixing areas), golf courses, landfill or junkyards or for sites where hazardous products exceeding 250 gallons of liquid or 1,000 pounds of solids were stored or processed or where hazardous wastes in excess of 220 pounds per month or 110 gallons at any point in time were generated or stored. The amount of sampling and testing shall be determined by a registered professional with experience in the field of Environmental Site Assessment and shall at a minimum test for organochlorine pesticides (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 8081) and Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) 8 metals using Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) soil sampling Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) FS 3000, in areas suspected of being used for mixing and at discharge point of water management system. Sampling should occur randomly if no points of contamination are obvious. Include a background soil analysis from an undeveloped location hydraulically upgradient of the potentially contaminated site. Soil sampling should occur just below the root zone, about 6 to 12 inches below ground surface or as otherwise agreed upon with the registered professional with experience in the field of Environmental Site Assessment. Include in or with the Environmental Site Assessment, the acceptable State and Federal pollutant levels for the types of contamination found on site and indicate in the Assessment, when the contaminants are over these levels. If this analysis has been done as part of an Environmental Audit then the report shall be submitted. The County shall coordinate with the FDEP where contamination exceeding applicable FDEP standards is identified on site or where an Environmental Audit or Environmental Assessment has been submitted. 13. Provide justification for deviations from environmental LDC provisions pursuant to GMP CCME Policy 6.1.1 (13), if requested. 14. Where applicable, provide evidence of the issuance of all applicable federal and/or state oil and gas permits for proposed oil and gas activities in Collier County. Include all state permits that comply with the requirements of Chapter 62C-25 through 62C-30, F.A.C., as those rules existed on January 13, 2005. 15. Identify any Wellfield Risk Management Special Treatment Overlay Zones (WRM-ST) within the project area and provide an analysis for how the project design avoids the most intensive Iand uses within the most sensitive WRM-STs and will comply with the WRM-ST pursuant to 3.06.00. Include the location of the Wellfield Risk Management Special Treatment Overlay Zones on the SDP or final plat construction plans. For land use applications such as standard and PUD rezones and CUs, provide a separate site plan or zoning map with the project boundary and Wellfield Risk Management Special Treatment Overlay Zones identified. 16. Demonstrate that the design of the proposed stormwater management system and analysis of water quality and quantity impacts fully incorporate the requirements of the Watershed Management regulations of 3.07.00. P& -5. 5 17. The County Manager or designee may require additional data or information necessary to evaluate the project's compliance with LDC and GMP requirements. (LDC 10.02.02.A.3 f) The following to be determined at preapplication meeting: (Choose those that apply) a. Provide overall description of project with respect to environmental and water management issues. b. Explain how project is consistent with each of the applicable objectives and policies in the CCME of the GMP. c. Explain how the project meets or exceeds the native vegetation preservation requirement in the CCME and LDC. d. Indicate wetlands to be impacted and the effects of the impact to their functions and how the project's design compensates for wetland impacts. e. Indicate how the project design minimizes impacts to listed species. Describe the measures that are proposed as mitigation for impacts to listed species. 18. PUD zoning and CU petitions. For PUD rezones and CU petitions, applicants shall collate and package applicable Environmental Data Submittal Requirements into a single Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) document, prior to public hearings and after all applicable staff reviews are complete. Copies of the EIS shall be provided to the County Manager or designee prior to public hearings. 19. Is EAC Review (by CCPQ required? 20. PUD master plan or PPLISDP site plan notes: Where preserves occur adjacent to development off site and will be used in lieu of landscape buffers, include the following condition in the environmental commitments section of the PUD document. Preserves may be used to satisfy the landscape buffer requirements after exotic vegetation removal in accordance with LDC sections 4.06.02 and 4.06.05.E.1. Supplemental plantings with native plant materials shall be in accordance with LDC section 3.05.07. 21. Additional comments 22. Stipulations for approval (Conditions) Environmental PUDZ-PUDA Checklist (nun-RFMU) Project Nate 1. Is the project in compliance with the overlays, districts and/or zoning on the subject site and/or the surrounding properties? (CON, ST, PUD, RLSA, RFMU, etc.) (LDC 2.03.05-2.03.08; 4.08.00) Not in CV Library 2. Submit a current aerial photograph (available from the Property Appraiser's office) and clearly delineate the subject site boundary lines. If the site is vegetated, provide FLUCFCS overlay and vegetation inventory identifying upland, wetland and exotic vegetation (Admin. Code Ch. 3 G.1. Application Contents #24). FLUCFCS Overlay -P627 3. Clearly identify the location of all preserves and label each as "Preserve" on all plans. (LDC 3.05.07.H.1). Preserve Label- P546 4. Provide calculations on site plan showing the appropriate acreage of native vegetation to be retained, the max. amount and ratios permitted to be created on -site or mitigated off -site. Exclude vegetation located within utility and drainage easements from the preserve calculations (LDC 3.05.07.E-D; 3.05.07.F; 3.05.07.H. Ld-e). Preserve Calculation - P547 5. Created and retained preserve areas shall meet the minimum width requirements per LDC 3.05.07.H.1.b. Preserve Width - P603 6. Retained preservation areas shall be selected based on the criteria defined in LDC 3.05.07.A.3, include all 3 strata, be in the largest contiguous area possible and shall be interconnected within the site and to adjoining off -site preservation areas or wildlife corridors. (LDC 3.05.07.A.1-4) Preserve Selection- P550 7. Principle structures shall be located a minimum of 25' from the boundary of the preserve boundary. No accessory structures and other site alterations, fill placement, grading, plant alteration or removal, or similar activity shall be permitted within 10' of the boundary unless it can be shown that it will not affect the integrity of the preserve (i.e. stem wall or berm around wetland preserve). Provide cross -sections for each preserve boundary identifying all site alterations within 25'. (LDC 3.05.07.H.3; 6.01.02.C.) Preserve Setback — New Wildlife survey required for sites where an EIS is not required, when so warranted. (LDC 10.02.02.A.2.f) Listed Species - P522 9. Provide Environmental Data identifying author credentials, consistency determination with the GMPs, off -site preserves, seasonal and historic high water levels, and analysis of water quality. For land previously used for farm fields or golf course, provide soil sampling/groundwater monitoring reports identifying any site contamination. (LDC 3.08.00) Environmental Data Required — P 522 10. PUD Document and Master Plan shall state the minimum acreage required to be preserved. (LDC 10.02.13.A.2) Master Plan Contents-P626 11. If the PUD includes a Preserve Tract section UP FOR DISCUSSION — DISCUSS WITH CAO When listing preserve uses, the following is suggested: A. Principal Use: Preserve; B. Accessory Uses: All other uses (list as applicable or refer to the LDC — see 1-3 below as typical uses listed by agents) (ensure the text states "subject to LDC section related to Allowable uses within County required preserves" Alternate format: A. Uses subject to LDC section Allowable uses within County required preserves: 1. Nature trails that do not reduce the amount of required preserve. 2. Passive Recreation uses, as per LDC requirements. 3. Stormwater only when in accordance with the LDC. 1 �i 2 i PUD Commitments and Site Plan notes Where preserves occur adjacent to development off site and will be used in lieu of landscape buffers, include the following condition in the environmental commitments section of the PUD document or master plan: Preserves may be used to satisfy the landscape buffer requirements after exotic vegetation removal in accordance with LDC sections 4.06.02 and 4.06.05.E.1. Supplemental plantings with native plant materials shall be in accordance with LDC section 3.05.07. 12. PUD Document shall identify any listed species found on site and/or describe any unique vegetative features that will be preserved on the site. (LDC 10.02.13.A.2.) Unique Features- P628 Example: A management plan for the entire project shall be submitted in accordance with the requirements and procedures of the LDC for listed species including but not limited to Black Bear, Gopher Tortoise and listed birds. The management plan shall be submitted prior to development of the first phase of the project. 13. Review cross -sections if provided; they are not required with the PUD. However, sometimes they are provided. Is there any fill proposed in the preserve? Additional Comments: 1'G- 3 H-. Co[iYer County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 Pre -Application Meeting Sign -In Sheet PL# 20200001827 Collier County Contact Information: Name Review Discipline Phone Email ❑ David Anthony Environmental Review 252-2497 david.anthony@colliercountyfi.gov ❑ Claudine Auclair G M D Operations and Regulatory Management 252-5887 claudine.auclair@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Sally Ashkar Assistant County Attorney 252-8842 sally.ashkar@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Steve Baluch Transportation Planning 252-2361 stephen.baluch@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Ray Bellows Zoning, Planning Manager 252-2463 raymond.bellows@colliercountyfl.gov le Laurie Beard PUD Monitoring 252-5782 laurie.beard@colliercountyfl.gov Craig Brown Environmental Specialist 252-2548 craig.brown @colIiercountyfLgov Alexandra Casanova Operations Coordinator 252-2658 Alexandra.casanova @co11iercountyfLgov _� ,P Heidi Ashton Cicko Managing Asst. County Attorney 252-8773 heidi.ashton@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Thomas Clarke Operations Coordinator 252-2584 thomas.clarke@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Jamie Cook Prin. Environmental Specialist 252-6290 Jaime.cook@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Eric Fey, P.E. Utility Planning 252-1037 eric.fey@colliercountyfl.gov Tim Finn, AICP Zoning Division 252-4312 timothy.finn@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Sue Faulkner Comprehensive Planning 252-5715 sue.faulkner@coiliercountyfl.gov l.. Jeremy Frantz LDC Manager 252-2305 Jeremy. Frantz@colliercount fI. ov ❑ James French Growth Management Deputy Department Head 252-5717 james.french@coiliercountyfLgov ❑ Michael Gibbons Structural/Residential Plan Review 252-2426 michael.gibbons@colliercountVfl.gov Storm Gewirtz, P.E. Engineering Stormwater 252-2434 storm.gewirtz@colliercountyfl.gov C: Nancy Gundlach, AICP, PLA Zonin Division 252-2484 nancy.gundlach@colliercountyfi.gov Richard Henderlong Principal Planner 252-2464 rchard.henderlong@colliercountyff.gov ❑i John Houldsworth Engineering Subdivision 252-5757 john.houldsworth@coiliercountyfl. ov ❑ Alicia Humphries Right -Of -Way Permitting 252-2326 alicia.humphries@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Erin Josephitis Environmental Specialist, Senior 252-2915 erin.josephitis@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Marcia Kendail Comprehensive Planning 252-2387 marcia.kendall@colliercountyfl.gov John Kelly Zoning Senior Planner 252-5719 john.kelly@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Diane Lynch Operations Analyst 252-8243 diane.lynch@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Gil Martinez I Zoning Principal Planner 252-4211 gilbert.martinez@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Thomas Mastrobert❑ I Greater Naples Fire 252-7348 thomas.mastroherto@coiliercountyfl.gov Updated 7/11/2019 Page 1 4 of 5 Coder County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 [. ! Jack McKenna, P.E. Engineering Services 252-2911 jack.mckenna@coIIiercountyfl.gov Matt McLean, P.E. Development Review Director 252-8279 matthew.mclean@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Michele Mosca, AICP Capital Project Planning 252-2466 michele.mosca@coiliercountyfLgov ❑ Annis Moxam Addressing 252-5519 annis.moxam@colliercountyfl.gov Richard Orth 5tormwater Planning 252-5092 richard.orth@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Brandy Otero Transit 252-5859 bra ndy.otero@coil iercountyfI-gov ❑ Brandi Pollard Utility Impact fees 252-6237 bra ndi.pal lard@col lie rcountyfLgov Todd Rig all North Collier Fire 597-9227 triggall@northcollierfire.com 1� Brett Rosenblum, P.E, Development Review Principal Project Manager 252-2905 bi-ett.rosenblum@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ James Sabo, AICP Zoning Principal Planner 252-2708 james.sabo@colliergo.net 6�' Michael Sawyer Transportation Planning 252-2926 michael.sawyer@colliercountyfl.gov P-1--corby Schmidt, AICP Comprehensive Planning 252-2944 corby.schmidt@colliercountyfl.gov Chris Scott, AICP Development Review - Zoning 252-2460 chris.scott@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Linda Simmons North Collier Fire 252-2311 Linda.Simmons@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Peter 5hawinsky Architectural Review 252-8523 peter.shawinsky@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Camden Smith Zoning Operations Manager 252-1042 camden.smith@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Mark Strain Hearing Examiner/CCPC 252-4446 mark.strain@colliercountyfl.gov Mark Templeton Landscape Review 252-2475 mark.templeton@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Jessica Velasco Zoning Division Operations 252-2584 Jessica.veiasco@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ ton Walsh, P.E. Building Review 252-2962 jonathan.walsh@colliercountyfl.gov I. David Weeks, AICP Comprehensive Planning Future Land Use Consistency 252-2306 david.weeks@colliercountyfl.gov Klrsten Wilkie Environmental Review Manager 252-5518 kirsten.wilkie@colliercountyfl.gov I� Christine Willoughby Development Review - Zoning 252-5748 christine.willoughby@coliiercountyfl.gov ' "Daniel Zunzunegui North Collier Fire 252-2310 Daniel.Zunzune ui@colliercountyfl.gov Additional Attendee Contact Information: Name Representing Phone Email WAY#vja A*ry u j �? Updated 7/11/2019 Page 1 5 of 5 OVICY C014nty Growth Management Department Zoning Division Applicant/Agent may cis send site plans or conceptual plans far review in advance if desired. PL20200001827 — RCMA Immokalee PUD2 - Planner - Tim Finn Assigned aps Staff: Thomas Clarke Jeremy Frantz-ops Staff) STAFF FORM FOR SUPPLEMENTAL PRE -APPLICATION MEETING INFORMATION • Name and Number of who submitted pre-app request Sharon Umpenhour, 239.947.1144 ■ Agent to list for PL# D. Wayne Arnold, AICP • Owner of property (ail owners for all parcels) Barron Collier Partnership, LLLP ■ Confirm Purpose of Pre-App: (Rezone, etc.) PUD Rezone • Please include any Surveys, Drawings or Plans for the petition: ■ Details about Project: Rezone to allow 250 student child care tenter, charter school, community center and residential dwelling units. REQUIRED Supplemental Information provided by: Name. Sharon Umpenhour Title: Senior Planning Technician Email: sumpenhour@gradyminor.com Phone: 239.947.1144 Cancellation/Reschedule Requests: Contact Danny Condomina-Client Services Supervisor dany.condominao?colliercountyfl Phone: 239-252-5866 Created April S, 2017 _ocation; K:ICOES Planning Services\Current\Zoning Staff Information Zoning Dimon • 28W North Horseshoe Drive • Naples, Florida 34104.230.252-2400 • www-cokergov.net d td 7 h � d m Vt w Qfj d 9 9 4 l � I dy a S 2. r �4 4 4L N v N N ca f4 � G1 L L 0 aC a) rn a' o U 2 Y 0>1 cn `mac aa+0. ) rn o r E m N iZl Ql 'S U W N Rt Lmr��x.c mUUQr�]u7aOEAiiaN m r ni vi4L6(6r�0601 1 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net Co er County 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 PROPERTY OWNERSHIP DISCLOSURE FORM This is a required form with all land use petitions, except for Appeals and Zoning Verification Letters. Should any changes of ownership or changes in contracts for purchase occur subsequent to the date of application, but prior to the date of the final public hearing, it is the responsibility of the applicant, or agent on his behalf, to submit a supplemental disclosure of interest form. Please complete the following, use additional sheets if necessary. a. If the property is owned fee simple by an INDIVIDUAL, tenancy by the entirety, tenancy in common, or joint tenancy, list all parties with an ownership interest as well as the percentage of such interest: 21 C. Name and Address % of Ownership If the property is owned by a CORPORATION, list the officers and stockholders and the ,ercentage of stock owned by each: Name and Address % of Ownership If the property is in the name of a TRUSTEE, list the beneficiaries of the trust with the orinteresT: Name and Address I % of Ownership Created 9/28/2017 Page 1 of 3 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.collieMon.net N f 9. Coder County 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 If the property is in the name of a GENERAL or LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, list the name of the g CI ICI di dI lu/ Ur IIf I IILCU Pdr Lner a: Name and Address % of Ownershia If there is a CONTRACT FOR PiJRCHASE, with an individual or individuals, a Corporation, Trustee, or a Partnership, list the names of the contract purchasers below, including the C 'I IIL.�„1 �, �LVLM1I 4V IU C! ], LiCF ICI ILldf ICE, UI PdI LI ICI,: Name and Address % of Ownership Date of Contract: If any contingency clause or contract terms involve additional parties, list all individuals or of , or trust: Name and Address Date subject property acquired ❑ Leased: Term of lease years /months If, Petitioner has option to buy, indicate the following: Created 9/28/2017 Page 2 of 3 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergor►.net Date of option: Comer County 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Date option terminates: , ❑r Anticipated closing date: AFFIRM PROPERTY OWNERSHIP INFORMATION Any petition required to have Property Ownership Disclosure, will not be accepted without this form. Requirements for petition types are located on the associated application form. Any change in ownership whether individually or with a Trustee, Company or other interest -holding party, must be disclosed to Collier County immediately if such change occurs prior to the petition's final public hearing. As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest that atl of the information indicated on this checklist is included in this submittal package. I understand that failure to include all necessary submittal information may result in the delay of processing this petition. The completed application, all required submittal materials, and fees shall be submitted to: Growth Management Department ATTN. Business Center 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Agent/Owner Signature Agent/Owner Name (please print) Date Created 9/28/2017 Page 3 of 3 Co e'er County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colfiercounty.gov Final Submittal Requirement Checklist for: X PUD Rezone- Ch. 3 G. 1 of the Administrative Code ❑ Amendment to PUD- Ch. 3 G. 2 of the Administrative Code ❑ PUD to PUD Rezone- Ch. 3 G. 1 of the Administrative Code 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 The following Submittal Requirement checklist is to be utilized during the Pre -Application Meeting and at time of application submittal. At final submittal, the checklist is to be completed and submitted with an up-to-date application. Please provide the submittal items in the exact order listed below, with cover sheets attached to each section. Incomplete submittals will not be accepted. A Model PUD Document is available online at http://www.co iercountfl. ov Home ShowDocument?id=75983. REQUIREMENTS 7OF5 REQUIRED REQUIRED Cover Letter with Narrative Statement including a detailed description of why amendment is necessary 1 ❑ ❑ Completed Application with required attachments (download latest version) 1 Pre -application meeting notes 1 ❑ Affidavit of Authorization, signed and notarized 1 Property Ownership Disclosure Form 1 Notarized and completed Covenant of Unified Control 1 Completed Addressing Checklist 1 Warranty Deed(s) 1 0 ❑ List Identifying Owner and all parties of corporation 1 ❑ Signed and sealed Boundary Survey 1 ® ❑ Architectural Rendering of proposed structures 1 ❑ Current Aerial Photographs (available from Property Appraiser) with project boundary and, if vegetated, FLUCFCS Codes with legend included on aerial. 1 ❑ Statement of Utility Provisions 1 ❑ Environmental Data Requirements pursuant to LDC section 3.08.00 1 ❑ Environmental Data Requirements collated into a single Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) packet at time of public hearings. Coordinate with project planner at time of public hearings. ❑ [� ❑ Listed or Protected Species survey, less than 12 months old. Include copies of previous surveys. 1 ❑ Traffic Impact Study 1 ❑ Historical Survey i ❑ �" School Impact Analysis Application, if applicable 1 ❑ Electronic copy of all required documents 1 ❑ Completed Exhibits A-F (see below for additional information)' m ❑ List of requested deviations from the LDC with justification for each (this document is separate from Exhibit E) ® ❑ Checklist continues on next page March 4, 2020 Page 9 of 11 COfier County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliercounty.gov 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Revised Conceptual Master Site Plan 24" x 36"and One 8 A" x 11" copy ❑ ❑ Original PUD document/ordinance, and Master Plan 24" x 36" — Only if Amending the PUD El ❑ Revised PUD document with changes crossed thru & underlined 1 ❑ Copy of Official Interpretation and/or Zoning Verification 1 ❑ 2 *If located in Immokalee or seeking affordable housing, include an additional set of each submittal requirement 'The following exhibits are to be completed on a separate document and attached to the application packet: Exhibit A: List of Permitted Uses C Exhibit B: Development Standards Exhibit C: Master Plan- See Chapter 3 E. 1. of the Administrative Code Exhibit D: Legal Description Exhibit E: List of Requested LDC Deviations and justification for each Exhibit F: List of Development Commitments If located in RFMI.J Rural Fringe Mixed Use Receiving Land Areas Pursuant to LDC subsection 2.03.08.A.2.a.2.(b.)i.c., the applicant must contact the Florida Forest Service at 239- 690-3500 for information regarding "Wildfire Mitigation & Prevention Plan." PLANNERS — INDiCATE IF THE PETITION NEEDS TO BE ROUTED TO THE FOLLOWING REVIEWERS: School District (Residential Components): Amy Lockheart ❑ Conservancy of SWFL: N i c h o I e Johnson Utilities Engineering: Eric Fey Parks and Recreation: Barry Williams (Director) Emergency Management: Dan Summers ❑ Immokalee Water/Seuver District: ❑ City of Naples: Robin Singer, Planning Director ❑ Other: ❑ City of Naples Utilities ❑ Other: ASSOCIATED FEES FOR APPLICATION Pre -Application Meeting: $500.00 PUD Rezone: $10,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre C PUD to PUD Rezone: $8,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre PUD Amendment: $6,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre Comprehensive Planning Consistency Review: $2,250.00 Environmental Data Requirements -EIS Packet (submittal determined at pre -application meeting): $2,500.00 l r Listed or Protected Species Review (when an EIS is not required): $1,000.00 j Transportation Review Fees: orc;r i,; - e.�Te1 Pao s' ,x•];: o Methodology Review: $500.00 *Additional fees to be determined at Methodology Meeting. o Minor Study Review: $750,00 o Major Study Review $1,500.00 March 4, 2020 Page 10 of 11 Co`ler County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliercounty.gov 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX. (239) 252-6358 Legal Advertising Fees: .3/CCPC: $1,125.00 KBCC: $500.00 School Concurrency Fee, if applicable: o Mitigation Fees, if application, to be determined by the School District in coordination with the County Fire Cade Plans Review Fees are not listed, but are collected at the time of application submission and those fees are set forth by the Authority having jurisdiction. The Land Development Code requires Neighborhood Notification mailers for Applications headed to hearing and this fee is collected prior to hearing. All checks payable to: Board of County Commissioners. As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is included in this submittal package. I understand that failure to include all necessary submittal information may result in the delay of processing this petition. *Additional fee for the 5"' and subsequent re -submittal will be accessed at 20% of the original fee. Signature of Petitioner or Agent Printed named of signing party Date March 4, 2020 Page 11 of 11 AFFIDAVIT OF AUTHORIZATION FOR PETITION NUMBERS(S) PL20200001827 1 David B. Genson (print name), as sr. VP of Barron Collier Management, LLC as General Partner (title, If applicable) of Barron Collier Partnership LLLP (company, If applicable), swear or affirm under oath, that I am the (choose one) owner0 applicant =contract purchaser=and that: 1. I have full authority to secure the approval(s) requested and to impose covenants and restrictions on the referenced property as a result of any action approved by the County in accordance with this application and the Land Development Code; 2. All answers to the questions in this application and any sketches, data or other supplementary matter attached hereto and made a part of this application are honest and true; 3. 1 have authorized the staff of Collier County to enter upon the property during normal working hours for the purpose of investigating and evaluating the request made through this application; and that 4. The property will be transferred, conveyed, sold or subdivided subject to the conditions and restrictions imposed by the approved action. 5. Well authorize Redlands Christian Migrant Association, Inc. to act as our/my representative in any matters regarding this petition including 1 through 2 above. "Notes: • If the applicant is a corporation, then it is usually executed by the Corp. pres. or v. pres. • If the applicant is a Limited Liability Company (L.L.C.) or Limited Company (L.C.), then the documents should typically be signed by the Company's "Managing Member." • If the applicant is a partnership, then typically a partner can sign on behalf of the partnership. • If the applicant is a limited partnership, then the general partner must sign and be identified as the "general partner' of the named partnership. • If the applicant is a trust, then they must include the trustee's name and the words "as trustee". • In each instance, first determine the applicant's status, e.g., individual, corporate, trust, partnership, and then use the appropriate format for that ownership. Under penalties of perjury, I, Clare that I have read the foregoing Affidavit of Authorization and that the fact 57 i ' pare truip. Signature STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER 12/16/20 Date The foregoing instrument was acknowleged before me by means of ]physical presence or Qonline notarization this 16 day of December 20 20 , by (printed name of owner or qualifier) David B. Genson Such person(s) Notary Public must check applicable box: 0 Are personally known to me Has produced a current drivers license M Has produced as identification. Notary Signature. v CP\08-COA-00115\155 REV 3/4/2020 SABINAE. HARDY MY COMMISSION # GG 287225 :;rQo EXPIRES: January 14, 2023 F F,F4° Bonded Thru Notary Public Underwriters AFFIDAVIT OF AUTHORIZATION FOR PETITION NUMBERS(S) PL20200001827 I,. lsab l 6ayc-f a (print name), as �iX4e-c "+ i/f- 2) 1,-L'�7�Y (title, if applicable) of Redlands Christian Migrant Association, Inc. (company, If applicable), swear or affirm under oath, that I am the (choose one) owner= applicant Qcontract purchaser=and that: 1. I have full authority to secure the approval(s) requested and to impose covenants and restrictions on the referenced property as a result of any action approved by the County in accordance with this application and the Land Development Code; 2. All answers to the questions in this application and any sketches, data or other supplementary matter attached hereto and made a part of this application are honest and true; 3. 1 have authorized the staff of Collier County to enter upon the property during normal working hours for the purpose of investigating and evaluating the request made through this application; and that 4. The property will be transferred, conveyed, sold or subdivided subject to the conditions and restrictions imposed by the approved action. 5. Well authorize Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. to act as our/my representative in any matters regarding this petition including 1 through 2 above. *Notes: • If the applicant is a corporation, then it is usually executed by the corp. pres. or v. pres. • If the applicant is a Limited Liability Company (L.L.C.) or Limited Company (L.C.), then the documents should typically be signed by the Company's "Managing Member." • if the applicant is a partnership, then typically a partner can sign on behalf of the partnership. • If the applicant is a limited partnership, then the general partner must sign and be identified as the "general partner" of the named partnership. • If the applicant is a trust, then they must include the trustee's name and the words "as trustee". • In each instance, first determine the applicant's status, e.g., individual, corporate, trust, partnership, and then use the appropriate format for that ownership. Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I have read the foregoing Affidavit of Authorization and that the facts stated in it are true. -1CJ- azcc01 /.z z 2ozl) Signature Oate STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER The foregoing �instrument w�%a,sacknowleged before me by means of hysical presence or 0 online notarization this day of 1 L��Lf, 2tb2Q by (printed name of owner or qua lfier) Such person(s) Notary Public must check applicable box: re personally known to me ri Has produced a current drivers license rl Has produced as identific on. O,�PRY PGeli MISTY SMITH Notary Signature: } s rCommisslon#GG100832 ""�o Expires May 2, 2021 yfEoF fto�\ Bonded Thru Budget Notary Sarvlcea CP\08-COA-001151155 REV 3/4/2020 Redlands Christian Migrant Association Resolution # 20 — 1:1 Be it resolved by the State Board of Directors of the Redlands Christian Migrant Association that the RCMA Executive Director, (or the Associate Executive Director of RCMA in the absence of the Executive Director) is authorized to negotiate and contract on behalf of the Board of Directors and RCMA for funding the child services for the 2020-2021 program year from the following government and private agencies or entities: 1. Children's Boards in Florida 2. Children's Service Councils in Florida 3. Commercial, church, foundations and private organizations or individuals 4. Community Colleges, Private Colleges, Universities or other institutions of learning 5. County Commissions in Florida 6. County School Boards ( or Boards of Public Instruction) in Florida 7. Department of Children & Families or any successor Florida department 8. Department of Education or any of its state subdivisions in Florida 9. Department of Transportation 10. Housing authorities ( or management groups under contract with a housing authority) in Florida 11. Office of Early Learning 12. Office of Head Start 13. Rural Health Service Providers 14. United Ways or United Funds in Florida 15. Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services (National School Lunch Program) 16. Florida Department of Health (Child Care and Adult Nutrition Program) Be it further resolved that the Executive Director, (or the Associate Executive Director of RCMA in the absence of the Executive Director) is authorized to negotiate and contract funding for child care services from any governmental or non-profit agency not listed above. Be it further resolved that the Executive Director, (or the Associate Executive Director of RCMA in the absence of the Executive Director) is authorized to negotiate and enter into contracts, installment sales agreements, leases, and other corporate obligations (including leases and contracts for the purchase and sale of real estate) to carry out any and all purposes of RCMA (including but not limited to the purpose of implementing/using available funding for child services for the purpose of providing child services for the 2020-2021 program year) and to execute all documents necessary until such authorization is terminated by the Board of Directors in writing. June 1, 2020 RCMA State Board of Directors Meeting Immokalee, Florida Medora Krome, President Coder County 0 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 PROPERTY OWNERSHIP DISCLOSURE FORM This is a required form with all land use petitions, except for Appeals and Zoning Verification Letters. Should any changes of ownership or changes in contracts for purchase occur subsequent to the date of application, but prior to the date of the final public hearing, it is the responsibility of the applicant, or agent on his behalf, to submit a supplemental disclosure of interest form. Please complete the following, use additional sheets if necessary. a. If the property is owned fee simple by an INDIVIDUAL, tenancy by the entirety, tenancy in common, or joint tenancy, list all parties with an ownership interest as well as the percentage of such interest: n C. Name and Address % of Ownership N.A. If the property is owned by a CORPORATION, list the officers and stockholders and the ercentage of stock owned by each: Name and Address % of Ownership N.A. If the property is in the name of a TRUSTEE, list the beneficiaries of the trust with the percentage of interest: Name and Address % of Ownership N.A. If the property is in the name of a GENERAL or LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, list the name of the general and/or limited partners: Name and Address % of Ownership Barron Collier Partnership LLLP 100% Barron Collier Management, LLC 1.0000% Juliet C. Sproul Family Inheritance Trust 24.7500% Created 9/28/2017 Page 1 of 3 Coder County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Barron G. Collier III Lifetime Irrevocable Trust 24.7500% Lamar Gable Lifetime Irrevocable Trust 12.3750% FGVLIRT— Christopher D. Villere Family 4.1250% FGVLIRT— Mathilde V. Currence Family 4.1250% FGVLIRT— Lamar G. Villere Family 4.1250% Phyllis G. Alden Lifetime Irrevocable Trust 12.3750% Donna G. Keller Lifetime Irrevocable Trust 12.3750% e. If there is a CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE, with an individual or individuals, a Corporation, Trustee, or a Partnership, list the names of the contract purchasers below, includingthe officers, stockholders, beneficiaries, orpartners: Name and Address and Address % of Ownership Redlands Christian Migrant Association, Inc., a Florida Not for Profit Corporation (see attached Annual Report) 402 W Main St., Immokalee, FL 34142-39 100% Date of Contract: 5/20/20 f. If any contingency clause or contract terms involve additional parties, list all individuals or officers, if a corporation, partnership, ortrust: Name and Address g. Date subject property acquired 1998 ❑ Leased: Term of lease years /months If, Petitioner has option to buy, indicate the following: Date of option: Date option terminates: , or Created 9/28/2017 Page 2 of 3 Coder County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net Anticipated closing date: 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 AFFIRM PROPERTY OWNERSHIP INFORMATION Any petition required to have Property Ownership Disclosure, will not be accepted without this form. Requirements for petition types are located on the associated application form. Any change in ownership whether individually or with a Trustee, Company or other interest -holding party, must be disclosed to Collier County immediately if such change occurs prior to the petition's final publichearing. As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is included in this submittal package. I understand that failure to include all necessary submittal information may result in the delay of processing this petition. The completed application, all required submittal materials, and fees shall be submitted to: Growth Management Department ATTN: Business Center 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 December 15, 2020 Agent/Owner Signature Date D. Wayne Arnold, AICP Agent/Owner Name (please print) Created 9/28/2017 Page 3 of 3 CAK. Count y COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliereov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 COVENANT OF UNIFIED CONTROL The undersigned do hereby swear or affirm that we are the fee simple titleholders and owners of record of property commonly known as Parcel I.D. Number 00071960001 Lake Trafford Road. Immokalee Florida (Street address and City, State and Zip Code) and legally described in Exhibit attached hereto. The property described herein is the subject of an application for Mixed -use planned unit development (MPUD) zoning. We hereby designate Redlands Christian MiPrant Association, Inc. and 0. Gradv Minor & Associates. P.A. legal representative thereof, as the legal representatives of the property and as such, these individuals are authorized to legally bind all owners of the property in the course of seeking the necessary approvals to develop. This authority includes, but is not limited to, the hiring and authorization of agents to assist in the preparation of applications, plans, surveys, and studies necessary to obtain zoning approval on the site. These representatives will remain the only entity to authorize development activity on the property until such time as a new or amended covenant of unified control is delivered to Collier County. The undersigned recognize the following and will be guided accordingly in the pursuit of development of the project: 1. The property will be developed and used in conformity with the approved master plan including all conditions placed on the development and all commitments agreed to by the applicant in connection with the planned unit development rezoning. 2. The legal representative identified herein is responsible for compliance with all terms, conditions, safeguards, and stipulations made at the time of approval of the master plan, even if the property is subsequently sold in whole or in part, unless and until a new or amended covenant of unified control is delivered to and recorded by Collier County. 3. A departure from the provisions of the approved plans or a failure to comply with any requirements, conditions, or safeguards provided for in the planned unit development process will constitute a violation of the Land Development Code. 4. All terms and conditions of the planned unit development approval will be incorporated into covenants and restrictions which run with the land so as to provide notice to subsequent owners that all development activitywithin the planned unit development must be consistent with those terms and conditions. 5. So long as this covenant is in force, Collier County can, upon the discovery of noncompliance with the terms, safeguards, and conditions of the planned unit development, seek equitable relief as necessary to compel compliance. The County will not issue permits, certificates, or licenses to occupy or use any part of the planned unit development and the County may stop ongoing construction activity until the project is brought into compliance with all terms, conditions and safeguards of the planned unit development. Signed: v Bv: David B. Genson as SVP of Barron Collier Management. LLC as General Partners of/for Barron Collier Partnership LLLP STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me by means of ❑`physical presence or ❑online notarization this day of2020, by (printed name of owner or qualifier) Such person(s) Notary Public must check applicable box: O'Are personally known to me ❑ Has produced a current driver's license ❑ Has produced as identification."`"P'4: SABINAE. HARDY N :t MY COMMISSION a« GG 287225 Notary Signature: `+�� `o�°`' EXPIRES: January14,2023 March 4, 2020 Page 8 of 11 INSTR 4931321 OR 4998 PG 865 RECORDED 1/6/2014 3:40 PM PAGES 14 DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT, COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA REC $120.50 Bppartmrnt of 1*ttttr I certify the attached is a true and correct copy of the Articles of Merger, filed on December 30, 2013, effective..,­V r14� for BARRON COLLIER PARTNERSHIP, LLLP, the. nJ l= oncf ,�',as shown by the records of this office. F The document numbe CR2EO22 (1-11) bf this otp",Akb,6� is A0 _900 f,14T1. Given under my hand and the Great Seal of the State of Florida at Tallahassee, the Capital, this the Thirty-first day of December, 2013 Rrn Prfz r 1-5rrrrfnrLi of —SfMfr OR 4998 PG 866 Certificate of Merger f For Florida Limited Partnership or Limited Liability Limited Partnership The following Certificate of Merger is submitted in accordance with s. 620.2108, Florida Statutes. FIRST: The exact name, form/entity type, and jurisdiction for each mereina party are as follows: Name Jurisdiction Form/Entity Type Barron Collier Investments, Ltd. FL Limited Partnership Barron Collier Partnership, LLI=P SECOND: The e; as follows: Name Barron Collier P to Limited Partnership V ty type;" "r d urisdic on o the surviving party are i . J ict n t Form/Entity Tvpe Limited Partnership 4 t / THIRD: The date thi-rcr is effective under the g6rn�iiglaws of the surviving party is: (NOTE: If survivor is a Florida Iimil4 purtriershin or limited liability limited partnership, effective date cannot be prior to nor more than 90 days after the date this document is filed by the Florida Department of State. If survivor is not a Florida limited partnership or limited liability limited partnership, effective date shall be as provided in survivor's governing statute.) FOURTH: The merger was approved by each party as required by its governing law. 1 of 3 OR 4998 PG 867 FIFTH: If the surviving party is a foreign organization not qualified to transact business in this state, the street address and mailing address of an office which the Florida Department of State may use for the purposes of s. 620.2109(2), F.S., are as follows: Street address: [Not Applicable] Mailing address: SIXTII: Other proyisioris, if n lating to 2 of 3 OR 4998 PG 868 SEVENTH: Signature(s) for Each Party: (Merger must be signed by all general partners of Florida limited partnerships or limited liability limited partnerships and by the authorized representative of each other party.) Typed or Printed Name of Entity/Organization: Signature(s): Name of Individual: See attached signature page OR 4998 PG 869 SIGNATURE PAGE TO CERTIFICATE OF MERGER "MERGING PARTY" BARRON COLLIER INVESTMENTS, LTD., a Florida limited partnership By: Barron G. Collier III Lifetime Irrevocable Trust, dated December 13, 2012, as both �neral and a Limited Partner of BCI 4 co By: U X-` By: Juliet ` Dee4t Limited G. Sproul, Cc-T &" lee Gab e, Cc -Trustee �1 e�le berg, Co-T stee 11 3 3� ily Inheritance Trust, dated ,�q1l2, as both a General and a �df BCI orge, Trustee By: Lamar Gable Lifetime Irrevocable Trust, dated December 18, 2012, as both a General and a Limited Partner of BCI By: &e9V Bradley. . az, o-T teF47 By: Doug Baird, o- e By: Andrew R. Meulhnberiz. Co-Vrdstee 009596211 OR 4998 PG 870 OD958622.2 By: Frances G. Villere Lifetime Irrevocable Trust For Christopher D. Villere Family, dated June 13, 2011, as both a General and a Limited Part4Chrnistopp By: ' . Villere, Co -Trustee By: 'MNW A �-- Mathilde Villere Currence, Co -Trustee By: Robert Blakeslee Gable, Co -Trustee �res,_Villere Lifetime Irrevocable Trust rN&KUde Villere Currence Family, dated Jun 13,'gOl 1, as both a General and a —,---Limited Per`of BCI %ldelVillere Currence, Co -Trustee I cam. ariiar Ni"Jlere, Co -Trustee By: s 1 � tL Blakeslee Gable, Co -Trustee By: Frances.G. Villere Lifetime Irrevocable Trust For Lamar Gable Villere Family, dated June 13, 2011, as both a General and,a Limited Partner- of BCI By: La ar.G. Villere,_Co-T tee By: Christ her D. Villere, Co -Trustee By: Robert Blakeslee Gable, Co -Trustee 2 OR 4998 PG 871 By: Frances G. Villere Lifetime Irrevocable Trust For Christopher D. Villere Family, dated June 13, 2011, as both a General and a Limited Partner of BCI By: Christopher D. Villere, Co -Trustee By: Mathilde Villere Currence Co -Trustee By: A /� Robert Blakeslee Gable, Co -Trustee {R CVia.. Trust Fot< dated June By: By: llere Lifetime Irrevocable e Villere Currence Family, , 2 j 1, as both a General and a er of'BCI Currence, Co -Trustee Co -Trustee Co -Trustee By: Frances G. Villere Lifetime Irrevocable Trust For Lamar Gable Villere Family, dated June 13, 2011, as both a General and a Limited Partner of BC[ 1. By. Lamar G. Villere, Co -Trustee By: Christopher D. Villere, Co -Trustee By: Robert Blakeslee Gable, Co -Trustee 2 00958622.1 OR 4998 PG 872 (W566M.1 By: Phyllis G. Alden Lifetime Irrevocable Trust, dated April 07, 2011, as both a General and a Limited Partner of BCI r Barron Collier Ill, Co -Trustee By: LIN Katherine G. Sproul, Co -Trustee Robert Blakeslee Gable, Co -Trustee By: Donna G. Keller Lifetime Irrevocable Trust, ,dated December 14, 2012, as both a General and r �l Partner of BCT By: .-,.., Bracey A, Boaz, Co -Trustee n- L Robert, W �.» q E. Baird, Co -Trustee a Gable, Co -Trustee OR 4998 PG 873 By: Phyllis G. Alden Lifetime Irrevocable Trust, dated April 07, 2011, as both a General and a Limited Partner of BCI By: Barron Collier I11, Co-Tru t By: atherine G. Sproul, Co- s e By: 4� obert Blakeslee Gable, Co -Trustee a 4 BY-4 3 00958622.1 Lifetime Irrevocable Trust, 14, 2012, as both a General and r of BCI Co -Trustee OR 4998 PG 874 "SURVIVING PARTY' BARRON COLLIER PARTNERSHIP, LLLP, a Florida limited liability limited partnership By: Barron G. Collier III Lifetime Irrevocable Trust, dated December 13, 2012, as both a ne a LimitedPartner of BCP By: 'A' Katherine G. Sproul, Co-T ee 41fA obert Blakeslee Gable, Co -Trustee Co- Bj:",Juliet C._Sprootil Family Inheritance Trust, dated Seri er#012 as both a General and a J ,1'F' tedTa h&ofBCP Lin By: By: By: 4 00959622.1 Trustee r4a'16'Lifetime Irrevocable Trust, dated :firber 18, 2012, as both a General and a led Partner of BCP OR 4998 PG 875 00958622.1 By: Frances G. Villere Lifetime Irrevocable Trust For Christopher D. Villere Family, dated June 13, 2011, as both a General and a Limited Partner f BCP r I JJL'r By: 4Chriisto her D. �Villere, Co -Trustee By: Mathilde Villere Currence, Co -Trustee By: Robert Blakeslee Gable, Co -Trustee Frbj*0,-,,Q,Villere Lifetime Irrevocable TrusilF" TAittlii1de Villere Currence Family, dated 3'�O 11, as both a General and a kited P� P erof BCP AUtWldeNillere Currence, Co -Trustee �L'Vmar/dVlllere, Co -Trustee .A Blakeslee Gable, Co -Trustee BY: Frances-G. Villere Lifetime. Irrevocable Trust For Lama'r Gable Villere Family, dated June 13, 201.1, as both a General and a . Limit I ed Partner of BCP By: tee. e La ar.G ' Villere,.Co-Tt�-' B, Christop er D. Villere, Co -Trustee By: Robert Blakeslee Gable, Co -Trustee 5 OR 4998 PG 876 f By: Frances G. Villere Lifetime Irrevocable Trust For Christopher D. Villere Family, dated June 13, 2011, as both a General and a Limited Partner of BCP By: Christopher D. Villere, Co -Trustee By: Mathilldde Villere /jC�urrence, Co -Trustee B y: z Robert Blakeslee Gable, Co -Trustee yran�sVillere Lifetime Irrevocable Trust F N21 e Villere Currence Family, dated June pO1, as both a General and a Currence, Co -Trustee Co -Trustee Gable, Co -Trustee By: Frances G. Villere Lifetime Irrevocable Trust For Lamar Gable Villere Family, dated June 13, 2011, as both a General and a Limited Partner of BCP By: Lamar G. Villere, Co -Trustee M. Christopher D. Villere, Co -Trustee By: / i//f obert Blakeslee Gable, o-Trustee 5 O0958622.1 OR 4998 PG 877 00958622.1 By. Phyllis G. Alden Lifetime Irrevocable Tnist, dated April 07, 2011, as both a General and a Limited Partner of BCP BY: -`-%� �'��Ztl �-�� —,7T— Barron Collier III, Co -Trustee M. Katherine G. Sproul, Co -Trustee By: Robert Blakeslee Gable, Co -Trustee By: Donna G. Keller Lifetime Irrevocable Trust, datr d December 14, 2012, as both a General and �aMtitd Partner of BCP i t kq \q By: '~ 6 Bradley X Boaz, Co -Trustee 1 olas E. Baird, Co -Trustee y: Gable, Co -Trustee *** OR 4998 PG 878 *** By: Phyllis G. Alden Lifetime Irrevocable Trust, dated April 07, 2011, as both a General and a Limited Partner of BCP By: Barron Collier III, Co -Trustee By: Katherinee,GG.. Sproul, Co-Tru By: �j�� t Robert Blakeslee Gable, Co -Trustee Keller Lifetime Irrevocable Trust, �-cb0nber 14, 2012, as both a General and a Lim1t 4tl,er of BCP r° B'. Dol �'g a ,,._. By: le, Co -Trustee 6 00958622.1 Collier County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net ADDRESSING CHECKLIST 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 252-5724 Please complete the following and email to GMD_Addressing@colliergov.net or fax to the Operations Division at 239-252-5724 or submit in person to the Addressing Section at the above address. Form must be si , n�Y Addressing personnel prior to pre -application meeting, please allow 3 days for processing. Not all items will apply to every project. Items in bold type are required. FOLIO NUMBERS MUST BE PROVIDED. Forms older than 6 months will require additional review and approval by the Addressing Section. PETITION TYPE (Indicate type below, complete a separate Addressing Checklist for each Petition type) ❑ BL (Blasting Permit) ❑ SDP (Site Development Plan) ❑ BD (Boat Dock Extension) ❑ SDPA (SDP Amendment) ❑ Carnival/Circus Permit ❑ SDPI (Insubstantial Change to SDP) ❑ CU (Conditional Use) ❑ SIP (Site Improvement Plan) ❑ EXP (Excavation Permit) ❑ SIPI (Insubstantial Change to SIP) ❑ FP (Final Plat ❑ SNR (Street Name Change) ❑ LLA (Lot Line Adjustment) ❑ SNC (Street Name Change — Unplatted) ❑ PNC (Project Name Change) ❑ TDR (Transfer of Development Rights) ❑ PPL (Plans & Plat Review) ❑ VA (Variance) ❑ PSP (Preliminary Subdivision Plat) ❑ VRP (Vegetation Removal Permit) ❑ PUD Rezone ❑ VRSFP (Vegetation Removal & Site Fill Permit) ❑ RZ (Standard Rezone) Fol OTHER PUD Rezone LEGALI: 31 46 29 S1/2 OF NE1 /4, LESS LEGAL DESCRIPTION of subject property or properties (copy of lengthy c LEGAL2: R/W, LESSOR 739-675, S31/T46/R29 LEGAL3: 730-906, 621-1273, 770- 196, LEGAL4: LESS OR2280 PG 762 FOLIO (Property ID) NUMBER(s) of above (attach to, or associate with, legal description if more than one) 00071960001 STREET ADDRESS or ADDRESSES (as applicable, if already assigned) LOCATION MAP must be attached showing exact location of project/site in relation to nearest public road right- of-way • SURVEY (copy -needed only for unplatted properties) CURRENT PROJECT NAME (if applicable) PROPOSED PROJECT NAME (if applicable) RCMA Immokalee CFPUD PROPOSED STREET NAMES (if applicable) SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN NUMBER (for existing projects/sites only) SDP - or AR or PL # Rev. 6/9/2017 Page 1 of 2 Collier County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 252-5724 Project or development names proposed for, or already appearing in, condominium documents (if application; indicate whether proposed or existing) RCMA Immokalee CFPUD Please Return Approved Checklist By: 0 Email Applicant Name: Sharon Umpenhour ❑ Fax ❑ Personally picked up Phone: 239-947-1144 Email/Fax: sumpenhour@gradyminor.com Signature on Addressing Checklist does not constitute Project and/or Street Name approval and is subject to further review by the Operations Division. FOR STAFF USE ONLY Folio Number 00071960001 Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Approved by:_ �Ub'� Date: 11/04/2020 Updated by: Date: IF OLDER THAN 6 MONTHS, FORM MUST BE UPDATED OR NEW FORM SUBMITTED Rev. 6/9/2017 Page 2 of 2 Collier County Property Appraiser Property Aerial Site Site Zone Parcel No 00071960001 Address Site City IMMO ALEE *Note 34142 *Disclaimer Open GIS in a New Window with More Features. 2410765 OR: 2493 PG: Parcel I.D. #00053360001 Grantees TIN #65-0630512 This Document Prepared By And When Recorded Return To: Lee Treadwell Barron Collier Company 2600 Golden Gate Parkway, Ste. 200 Naples, FL 34105 RICORDID In 01FICIAL WORDS of COLLIII COUNTY, It 12/21/98 at 01:48PN ONIGRT 1. IROCI, CLIII CONS 14417500,00 RIC 111 12.50 INDIIING 9.00 DOC-.70 100922.50 COPIIS 18.00 DEED Ren: Al TRIADNILL 1600 COLDIN GATT PIY7 1200 NAPLIS PL 34105 This DEED is made this /� '4day. of a /) , 1998, by: Marguerite R. Collier, Lamar Gable and Barron Collier III, as Trustees of the Marguerite R. Collier Irrevocable Land Trust under date of 11 December 1996, and Harold S. Lynton, Katherine G. Sproul, and Juliet C. Sproul, as Trustees for Juliet C. Sproul under the Will of Barron Collier, Jr., deceased, as confirmed by Change of Trustees dated June 15, 1993, and filed June 22, 1993, in Probate No. 75-33, of the Probate Records of Collier County, Florida, and Barron Collier III, Individually, Phyllis G. Doane, Individually, (The mailing address of each Florida 34105), collectively ( TO W Barron Collier Investmef Grantee), whose mailing Florida 34105. N D, In #Wally, Frances G. Villere, Individually, G Kellet,,Jnd vidually. is a Florida limited pa is Suite 200,,,2600 } Gate Parkway, Naples, (hereinafter called the Gate parkway, Naples, Grantor, for One Dollar whose receipt is hereby acknowledged, hereby grants, transfers and conveys to the Grantee, and its successors and assigns, the Grantor's ownership in real property in Collier County, Florida, described in the attached and incorporated Exhibit W, but less and except whatever interest each Grantor may now have in the oil, gas and minerals under, and that may be produced from, that Grantor's real property as described in Exhibit W, and each grantor reserves unto himself, herself, or itself whatever interest that Grantor may now have in the oil, gas and minerals, under, and that may be produced from that Grantor's real property as described in Exhibit W. This deed includes any and all right, title and interest of a Grantor in and to any and all buildings and improvements on or to that real property, any and all fixtures and personal property on and used in connection with that real property. None of the real property is the homestead of a Grantor, or any member of a Grantor's family. Each individual Grantor resides on real property other than is conveyed by this deed. Grantor conveys that Grantor's real property to Grantee without express or implied warranty. All warranties that might arise by common law and Florida Statues are excluded. a CUIUtR 1.0.Um R H OR: 2493 PG: 2780 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, grantor has executed and delivered this deed the day and year first above mentioned. Signed, sealed and delivered in our presence: Witng8$ SUs,+hj , .. MAT�,e.J Print Name r� _ 14 Witness " U ?radlex A,-&4 Print Name ,i ` Witr ss /- "1c1 PrintName1.o, Witness Print Name Print Marguerite R. Collier, as Trustee of the Marguerite R, Collier Irrevocable Land Trust Lamar abl4t2i=z4b&L sTrustee of the Marguerite R. Collier Irrevocable Land Trust Barron Collier III, as Trustee of the, Marguerite R. Collier Irrevocable Land Trust Witness 3 1 Print Nameti` V-1 STATE OF ±t_O /+ COUNTY OF �- L I M . �foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 1 day of , 1998, by Marguerite R. Collier, as Trustee. She is personally known to me or h mdunad "dFR�Tt:S�A�r L Oas identification. ,"pV PUe' SUSAN L MATURO i' r n oorMMMMHIMIN Men mdM 4tal) l� CCsssaa4 Notary o°° "z �c ' 6vgx /,L. mA r,e� 000 Print Name STATE OF LOI Z) DA COUNTY OF aLLIM T foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this �� day of , 1998, by Lamar Gable, as Trustee. He is personally known to me or has produced as identification. PAY PG WrIcarlJOYAVY IM 0 6� SUSAN L MATURO Nota Carwow`wirN[ir ry 5 L R Mr 0omm" M 8 Print Name Oi �.o OCT. 15 2000 2 OR: 2493 PG: 2781 STATE OF kh k Q A COUNTY OF Go f.LI t:Y1- The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ) 2- day of , 199t3, by Barron Collier III, as Trustee. He is personally known to me or has produced as identification. RY p&e OFFIMAL NOTARY SEAL SUSAN L MATURO COWM8810N NUIMIM < CC589434 9r� MY COMMISSION EXPIRES p OF f�6 OCT. 15,2000 ��df.if d� • /y1 �.l.lch.t) Wane Print tome Witness ,aal/Cv A e� Print Name Print Print Name Witness Print N - Witne:k/ /IifA' Q_Z Print Name STATE OF k0464_ COUNTY OF (hi-4-i -�- 4.sa� W Aatv"'� Notary sQZO L. MAru" Print Name Harold S. Lynt as Trustee for Juliet C. Sproul under the Will of Barron Collier, Jr., deceased, and as confirmed by Change of Trustees dated June 15, 1993 in Probate No. 76-33, of the Probate Records of Collier County, Florida ierine G. Sproul, as Trust e uliet C. Sproul under the arron Collier, Jr., deceased, as confirmed by Change of tees dated June 15, 1993 filed June 22, 1993, in Tate No. 76-33, of the Tate Records of Collier nty, Florida 114 -4, Nit C. Sproul, as TrLrstee for uliet C. Sproul under the Will of Barron Collier, Jr., deceased, and as confirmed by Change of Trustees dated June 15, 1993 in Probate No. 76-33, of the Probate Records of Collier County, Florida The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this I?k day of Q�I�O�i�Pn 1M, by Harold S. Lynton, as Trustee. He is personally known to me or has produced as identification. - —' OfFICUE"TAAL. ESPOLeBUSACOIWCMY pp1F.O OC STATE OF D COUNTY OF '('t � /'A Notary Print Name The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this IA)- day of 6 , 1998, by Katherine G Sproul, as Trustee. She is personally known to me or has produced as identification. —------ OFFEAL NOTARY SEAL Nota (Seal O!RY Po 19 SUSAN L MATURO ry z 5 n �a..s:�a« Nu�urA � l��Rlil l� • /rjCi7i�. �; a CC589434 Print Name yi bCF'' MY 00WAI`. SM EXWRES FOf FAO OCT. 15,2000 STATE OF ktiltA_ COUNTY OF CU L_io— The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of _ iel) 1998, by Juliet C. Sproul, as Trustee. She is personally known to me or has produced as identification. r1, OFCC FiC�AL SW NOTARY SERR AL �• l �l �G/DL�/CN (Seal °, SUSAN L MATURO Notary LCC569434 C,OMMISSWNEXawEB Print Name OCT, 15,2000 Witness Barron Collier III, Individually Print N me�� Witness Print Name b Witness a ar Ga le, Individually SUS rn A7" Print Na a Witness b✓4��� � a4Z Print Name Witrwss Frances G. Ville , Individually SuW 1, m R 7v /20 Print Name 0,17 Witness �?r4dl ✓ W � Print Name Mrs Phyll i G. Do e, Individually a �C)slq?j Z-.,n14-7�,�� Print Na Wilnes�raa���r � �->,�•r z Print Name JdAz Ve.� Witnes3, Print Name I �0 WitnessZV_14d/r v 14 f�rra Z Print Name STATE OF Fi:-0/ 10# COUNTY OF C,OLQaL Donna G. Keller, Individually The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of i�1X1'i , 1998, by Barron Collier III, Individually. He is personally known to me or has produced as identification. Y OFFICIAL NOTARY SEAL 0 `�S9 SUSAN L MATURO COMBMION NUMBER c CCOO9434IO MY OOMASO N EXPIRES OF FAO OCT. 15 2000 1w4" Notary, SAx �_ • IYJA7ZI46 Print Name STATE OF 6-0/ Oft COUNTY OF _._ The foregoing instrument was acknowledged tx /pn , 1998, by Lamar Gable, Individually. He produced as identification: j -- Op MY STATE OF FU feI U� COUNTY OF i.-�-i - this / A' day of nally known to me or has 9 egoing instrument was acknowledged before me this /a_k day of ,, for, 1998, by Frances G. vllere. She is personally known to me or has produced as identification. _ 434 N EXPIRES 2000 -. r rttIt A� o`"av vLe SUBAN L MATURO i cownloN NUMBER A c' CC509434 �� MY OOONMBBM EXPIRES OF F,O OCT. 15,2000 STATE OF o►2 i c)A COUNTY OF C0LLI r4 Not ry �SA� � • /h�iT��('a Print Name The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this I a -ie day of (345*6/ , 1998, Phyllis G. Doane. She is personally known to me or has produced as identification. 4"L' C�' /� a) Notary FjlOF P� FFRuSNOTARY REAL IJ�A Tu�6�SUSAN L MATURO nCOMBS= 7N MUMMER Print Name CC589434 FL0MYOCOOCTrE06MEXPIRES 15,2000 STATE OF IOA COUNTY OF CQLLIOL The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this %a day Of _, I W8, by Donna G. Keller. She is r e or has as identification. � X. /h (Seal) NotaryU oI pTMYSEAL �uSr�l/l-• T�/W RM MASER Print Name ��►� �wa£s1b 2000 Ldoc4..d4MM40.eo-r, v-tn,f. py J 1`, t J ¢ 6 ... Exhibit lk" Collier County All fractional Southeast 1/4. All lying West of S.R. 29. The South 1/2, less the Westerly 201.608 acres lying West of County Road right-of-way recorded in O.R. Book 156, Page 379; subject to easement recorded in Deed Book 13, Page 404, Public Records of Collier County, Florida. The South 1/2 of the South 1/2;`I:vl,ogWest of S.R. 29, less the West 30 feet thereof. Township 46 South. Se IZ All, lying West of S.R,/ Z9, lakdl( ( feket thereof and "1110 �2142, w less 1742, lands described i` 3 P and O.R. Book Page 933, Public R co d f' �i4 �`ounty, Florida. -J described as follows: 00 `ry (1) The North 1/2, less the East 30 feet thereof; subject to easement recorded in O.R. Hook 13, Page 404; (2) The Southwest 1/4; subject to easements recorded in O.R. Book 13, Page 404, and O.R. Book 2117, Page 1743; and (3) The Northeast 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4, less the East 30 feet thereof. Township 46 South. Range 29 East. Section 31 described as follows: (1) That part of the Northwest 1/4 lying North of S.R. 850, less lands described in O.R. Book 143, Page 270; O.R. Book 194, Page 966; O.R. Book 217, Page 925; O.R. Book 228, Page 924; O.R. Book 254, Page 451; O.R. Book 281, Page 682; O.R. Book 748, Page 1877; and O.R. Book 763, Page 680; subject to easements recorded in O.R. Book 644, Page 1671 and O.R. Book 1122, Page 49; and (2) That part of the South 1/2 of the Northeast 1/4 lying North of S.R. 850, less the North, East, and West 30 feet thereof, and less lands described in O.R. Book 551, Page 577; O.R. Book 621, Page 1273; O.R. Book 730, Page 1906; O.R. Book 739, Page 675; O.R. Book 770, Page 196; and O.R. Book 2280, Page 757; subject to easement recorded in O.R. Book 616, Page 1061. 1 Township 46 South, Range 29 East, Section 32 described as follows: (1) All of the Southeast 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4, lying North of S.R. 850, less the lands described in O.R. Book 603, Page 518; O.R. Book 603, Page 519; and O.R. Book 603, Page 520; and (2) The Southwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4, lying North of S.R. 850; subject to easement recorded in O.R. Book 572, Page 253, Public Records of Collier County, Florida. All, less the West 90.88 acres, subject to Florida Power and Light Company easement recorded in O.R. Book 441, Page 698. •1r1 • 1 C.1. 1 - - •1 All, less the Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4, and the West 1/2 of the Southeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4, and the North 1/2 of the Northwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4, and the Northwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4. All. All, less the lands �ae �i ea in o'•-* Bog* 2009,.Page 1539, Public Records of Coil:er county, F12d da'. i f . All, less the lands described in (Book 2009, Page 1539, subject to Florida Power and Light—'"- any easement recorded in O.R. Book 441, Page 698, Public Records of Collier County, Florida. All, less the lands described in O.R. Book 2009, Page 1539, subject to Florida Power and Light Company easement recorded in O.R. Book 441, Page 698, Public Records of Collier County, Florida. All, less the lands described in O.R. Book 2009, Page 1539, subject to Memorandum of Option dated April 10, 1997 recorded in O.R. Book 2320, Page 394, Public Records of Collier County, Florida. 1_ 1 MW ZT-Tor- UW4UN- - • 1 All, subject to Memorandum of Option dated April 10, 1997 and recorded in O.R. Book 2320, Page 394, Public Records of Collier County, Florida. 2 7 t N' jot j 7 South Range 27 East Section 7 All, subject to Memorandum of Option dated April 10, 1997 and recorded in O.R. Book 2320, Page 394, Public Records of Collier County, Florida. Township 47 South Range 27 East, Section 18 All, subject to Memorandum of Option dated April 10, 1997 and recorded in O.R. Book 2320, Page 394, Public Records of Collier County, Florida, Public Records of Collier County, Florida. Township 47 South Range 22 East. section 19 All, less the South 427 acres, subject to Memorandum of Option dated April 10, 1997 and recorded in O.R. Book 2320, Page 394, Public Records of Collier County, Florida. The West 1/2. All. All. All, less the lands d Public Records of Col All, less the lands d Public Records of Col )ed in O.R. unty, Flc 009, Page 1554, , Page 1554, All, less the lands described in O.R. Book 2009, Page 1554, Public Records of Collier County, Florida. Township 47 South Range 28 East Section 8 All, less the lands described in O.R. Book 2009, Page 1554, Public Records of Collier County, Florida. TownshiR 47 South Range 28 East Section 9 All, less the lands described in O.R. Book 2009, Page 1554, Public Records of Collier County, Florida. Township t7 South Range 28 East Section 10 All, less the lands described in O.R. Book 2009, Page 1554, Public Records of Collier County, Florida. 3 1tE t'u,6 , 69 f=f f :f.- •f All. The West 1/2. Township 47 South Range 28 East Section 15 All, less the lands described in O.R. Book 2009, Page 1554, Public Records of Collier County, Florida. Townshiv 47 South Range 28 East Section 17 All, less the lands described in O.R. Book 2009, Page 1554, Public Records of Collier County, Florida. TownshiR 47 South Range 28 East Section l8 All, less the lands described in O.R. Book 2009, Page 1554, Public Records of Collier County, Florida. All, less the lands descv�cl - Book 2009, Page 1554, Public Records of Coll' bunty, FlOrida.,-, Township 47 South on IT $✓ All, less the land d so� 9 Public Records of of for i na 1554, �y F#'-efi a =k 2009 Page S.R. 846. J— Township 47 South, F��h� 8 East. SectzioN� 22t All, less the lands d� c',ibed in O.R. Book 2009, Page 1554, Public Records of Coll buy, F1 and less and except the South 50 feet thereof.'" Townehi2 47 South Range 28 East Section 29 All, lying North of S.R. 846. Township 47 South Range 28 East, Section 30 All, lying North of S.R. 846. All. 4 00 Township 47 South Range 29 East. Section 9 described as follows: (1) All of the West 1/2, less lands described in O.R. Book 251, Page 60, O.R. Book 431, Page 59, and O.R. Book 2117,Page 1738; subject to road right-of-way described in O.R. Book 120, Page 408; subject to easements recorded in O.R. Book 234, Page 906, O.R. Book 13, Page 405, O.R. Book 1578, Page 1756, and County Road right-of-way recorded in O.R. Book 745, Page 1499. (2) The South 1/2 of the Southeast 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4, lying West of S.R. 856, less the South 30 feet and the West 30 feet thereof; subject to easement recorded in O.R. Book 851, Page 850. (3) The West 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4, less the West 30 feet thereof. (4) The Southeast 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4, less the East 30 feet thereof; subject to easement recorded in O.R. Book 235, Page 187. (5) The Northeast 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4, lying West of S.R. 856, less the North 30 feet and the West 30 feet thereof, and less lands described in O.R. Book 257, Page 418. (6) The Southeast 1/4 of tale theast.1/4 lying West of S.R. 856, less the West 30'fef the North 200 feet thereof, and less lands described in O.R. Book 2, Page 324; subject to easement recorded -,,in O.R. Book 13,�`Page 405. All, less ACL right of° * Northeast 1/4 East ,f of the Northwest 1/4 "',and of the Northwest 1/4; and 888, Page 66, O.R. Book„.1 1102, O.R. Book 1459, Rig subject to S.R. 29 righter 505; subject to easements Q.R. Book 147, Page 570; Book 1200, Page 1102. L9, the East I the Northwest 1 less the lands 18, Page 494" 229, and O.R, portion of the 2 of the Northeast 1/4 4 of -the Southwest 1/4 es�*bed in O.R. Book ook 1200, Page 6`60k 1869, Page 1954; $y'beed Book 9, Page Book 25, Page 241; 511, Page 402, and O.R. All of the Northwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4, less S.R. 846, less the North 60 feet, and less lands described in O.R. Book 339, Page 391, Public Records of Collier County, Florida. _ :•... .� All, lying South and East of S.R. 846. All, lying West of Camp Keis Road, less County Road 846. All, less S.R. 846 and less the lands described in O.R. Book 2009, Page 1539, Public Records of Collier County, Florida. 6 L t r�uM� Township 47 South Range 29 East, Section 30 All, less S.R. 846 and less the lands described in O.R. Book 2009, Page 1539, Public Records of Collier County, Florida. All, less the lands described in O.R. Book 2009, Page 1539, Public Records of Collier County, Florida. Townshig 47 South Range 30 East Section 1 All, less S.R. 846, S.R. 858 and less the lands described in O.R. Book 2009, Page 1539, Public Records of Collier County, Florida. Township 47 South. Range 30 East, Section 2 All, less S.R. 846 and less the lands described in O.R. Book 2009, Page 1539, Public Records of Collier County, Florida. All, less S.R. 846 and less the,_ ands described in O.R. Book 2009, Page 1539, Public Recorder o, tier County, Florida. CIT"-" All, less S.R. 846 afd less"-theland des ibed in O.R. Book 2009, Page 1539, Pupli Rctrls of Mier County, Florida. All, less S.R. 846.\ a All, less the lands described in O.R. Book 2009, Page 1539, Public Records of Collier County, Florida. Townshiv 47 South Range 30 East Section 10 All, less the lands described in O.R. Book 2009, Page 1539, Public Records of Collier County, Florida. TownshiR 47 South Range 30 East Section 11 All, less lands described in Deed Book 10, Page 88 and O.R. Book 2009, Page 1539, Public Records of Collier County, Florida. Township 47 South Range 30 East. Section 12 All, less S.R. 858. The Northwest 1/4. All, less the West 520 acres. All, less the West 520 acres. TownshiR 48 South, Range 28 East. Section 13 The Easterly 60 acres of the Northeast 1/4, and the Southeast 1/4, less S.R. 858. All, less the lands described in O.R. Book 1579, Page 1732, and O.R. Book 2009, Page 1539, Public Records of Collier County, Florida. All, less the lands described in O.R.-took 2009, Page 1554, Public Records of Colier'county, Florida,, All, less the lands ds i d n Public Records of Cfll y, All, less the North 50 Book 2009, Page 1539, All, less the North 50 feet. All, lose the North 50 feet. B o 4Q0j, Page 1539, on ' t the lands described in O.R. of Collier County, Florida. Township 48 South Range 29 East Section 25 All, less the lands described in O.R. Book 2009, Page 1539, Public Records of Collier County, Florida. Townahin 48 South, Range 29 East Section 26 All, less the lands described in O.R. Book 2009, Page 1539, Public Records of Collier County, Florida. 7 lio All, less the lands described in O.R. Book 2009, Page 1539, Public Records of Collier County, Florida. Townghp 48 South Range 29 East Section 34 All, less the West 191 acres and less the lands described in O.R. Book 2009, Page 1539, Public Records of Collier County, Florida. All, less the lands described in O.R. Book 2009, Page 1539, Public Records of Collier County, Florida. All, less the lands described in O.R. Book 2009, Page 1539, Public Records of Collier County, Florida. All, lying South of S.R. 858 (formerly known as S.R. 840), and West of the ACL right-of-way, and less the lands described in O.R. Book 2009, Page 1539, Public Records of Collier County, Florida. ,+'"ter` Township 48 South Rangd�3�0-•-Bast Sect' 8 All, lying South of S.Ft as8 now as S.R. 840), and less the lands described"in'O.lc. age 1539, Public Records of Collier Count , Flom' f t All, less the lands dY"ibed in O.R. Bo 2 09, Page 1539, Public Records of Coll I* r nty,�Flo + , All, lying South of the North line of County Road and West of ACL right-of-way, and less lands described in O.R. Book 344, Page 380, Public Records of Collier County, Florida. All of the West 1/2 lying West of the A.C.L. Right of Way, and less lands described in Deed Book 15, Page 504, Public Records of Collier County, Florida. All. All. 8 Township 48 South Rangg 30 East, Section 32 All, less S.R. 29, and ACL right-of-way. Township 49 Routh. Range 28 East Section 1 The Northeast 1/4. Township 49 South Range 28 East. Section 12 The West 1/2. Township 49 South Range 28 East Section 13 The West 1/2. Township 49 South Range 28 East, Section 14 The West 1/2 of the West 1/2, and the East 1/2 of the East 1/2. .,, a ,•- _ _ •� All the North 1/2. To nsh R 49 South Range 28 East, Section All the North 1/2. All, less the lands ,c *cr jd' in Q.�i. Bo 2009, Page 1539, ll Public Records of Coier " County, `'F1 The South 1/2. ownship 49 South Range 29 East, Section 4 The Northwest 1/4, and the South 1/2. Townsh12 49 South Range 29 East, Section 5 All, less the lands described in O.R. Book 2009, Page 1539, Public Records of Collier County, Florida. Township 49 South Range 29 East Section 6 All, less the lands described in O.R. Book 2009, Page 1554, Public Records of Collier County, Florida. Township 49 South Range 29 East. Section '7 The South 1/2. 9 a All, less the lands described in O.R. Book 2009, Page 1554, Public Records of Collier County, Florida. The West 1/2. That part of Government Lot 2 lying East of Gordon River. The South 1/2, less and except the right-of-way of U.S. Highway No. 41 (State Road 90); and less and except the lands conveyed by deed recorded in O.R. Book 586, Page 1713, O.R. Book 1412, Page 896 and O.R. Book 2318, Page 2932, Public Records of Collier County, Florida. All, lying West of ACL right-of-way, less lands described in Deed Book 25, Page 373, and subject - Lee County Electric Co-op easement recorded in O R. ! 3, 19ge 858 ... _-•--L2— c. n....�. ne,r....'on L+-♦ Cs..t .'rzn *.7fl'. All lying West of A¢L i Book 25, Page 373, no.o easement recorded C.I. All lying West of ACLiglit-of-way, less 1 Book 25, Page 373, and t to Lee Coun easement recorded in O R:9are58... All, less U.S. 41. All. All. The West 1/2. sFtdescribed in Deed Electric Co-op 2 s described in Deed Electric Co-op All, lying West of S.R. 29, less ACL right-of-way. 10 All, lying West of S.R. 29, less ACL right-of-way and subject to Lee County Electric Co-op easement recorded in O.R. Book 353, Page 858. -Tywnshig 52 South Range 30 East. Section 19 All, lying West of S.R. 29, subject to Lee county Electric Co-op easement and recorded in O.R. Book 353, Page 861. All, lying West of S.R. 29. Township 53 South Range 26 East Section 10 and Section 15 A tract or parcel of land lying Government Lot 12, Section 10, Township 53 South, Range 26 East, Cape Romano, Collier County, Florida which tract or parcel is described as follows: From a concrete post (Florida East Zone Plane Coordinates N 550,370.74 and 275,821.63-E) on the north line of Government Lot 11, said Section 10, as shown on sheet 9 of "Plat of Surveys in Township-.53f,South, Range 26 East, Romano Island and Vicinity, Coll ''bounty for Collier, Abrahamson & CD Maloney" by Carl E.,/Johnson, Registered' Land Surveyor, -- Florida Certificat,6 o. it-1, run,N 70-2410"E along Said north line of Lot,11 and the noro line said Lot 12 for 435 feet to the Po1W begi�� From said Point �f Begi2 ning ca'n t� 7002411011E along said north line.oi Lot 12 for 425 ee4i fore or less to the approximate Me*ri, gh Tide Lind of4r4l en's Bay, passing - through a concr�gte post (Florid East/ Ife Plane Coordinates ^' N 550,639 06 ari76, 575. 29 E) ;�, 3p65, t along said line; thence run soutkitosterly along shicl for 850 feet more or less to an inters�tion with a �n '`bearing S 1903513511E and passing through.AFointning; thence run N 19035150"W along saidTite to te,'Point of Beginning. Containing 4.7 acres more or less. Together with an undivided 1/2 interest in Government Lot 1 of Section 15, Township 53 South, Range 26 East. Township 53 South Range 29 East Section 2 The East 973.5 feet of the Northeast 1/4, lying West of S.R. 29. All, less TOWN OF EVERGLADES recorded in Plat Book 1, Page 87; less ACL right-of-way; less the Northeast 1/4 lying East of S.R. 29; and less the Southeast 1/4; subject to S.R. 29 right-of-way recorded in O.R. Book 16, page 452; subject to easement recorded in O.R. Book 308, Page 548. All of Tract B, lying East of ACL right-of-way, Town of Everglades as recorded in Plat Book 1, Page 87. All of Tract L, lying East of Canal, Town of Everglades recorded in Plat Book 1, Page 87. All of Tract M, Town of Everglades as recorded in Plat Book 1, Page 87. Lots 2, 3 and 4, Hammill and Crayton Subdivision recorded in Plat Book 2, Page 10. All of Block C, Immokalee Industrial Park according to the plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 14, Pages 7-8, Public Records of Collier County, Florida, being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the Northeast corner of said Block C; thence South 2005110" East along the easterly line of said Block C a distance of 657.82 feet to the Point of Beginning of the parcel herein being described: thence continue South 2°05'10" East along said easterly line a distance of 240.00 feet; thence leaving said easterly line South 87054050" West 161.51 feet; thence North 72012115" West 51.96 feet to an intersection with the arc of a circular curve, concave westerly, whose radius point bears North 72*12115" West 174.00 feet, said intersection being a point on the westerly line of sadi Block C; thence northerly along the arc of said circular curve and the easterly linO-of okC, through a central angle of19'� !distance of 60.38 . , feet; ,' , thence North 2°05 � West along the "westerly line of said Block C a Aistarrce -of 163.15 feet; thence leaving said der lice North �7°54'50" East 200.00 feet to thQ� inni�f{the parcel herein descri#*dW � " ) ,, 7 All that part of e mmokaleet,In s rial'Park, according to the plat recorded in"'Flat book 14, 'Pages­7 :and 8, Public Records of Collier County, Florida, lying West ofthe lands described in official Records Book 1283, Page 1016,' Public Records of Collier County, Florida. ? it. ld-mro-to-mrcArrevocaW a-1and- trust 12 f INSTR 4931321 OR 4998 PG 865 RECORDED 1/6/2014 3:40 PM PAGES 14 DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT, COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA REC $120.50 Bppartmrnt of 1*ttttr I certify the attached is a true and correct copy of the Articles of Merger, filed on December 30, 2013, effective..,­V r14� for BARRON COLLIER PARTNERSHIP, LLLP, the. nJ l= oncf ,�',as shown by the records of this office. F The document numbe CR2EO22 (1-11) bf this otp",Akb,6� is A0 _900 f,14T1. Given under my hand and the Great Seal of the State of Florida at Tallahassee, the Capital, this the Thirty-first day of December, 2013 Rrn Prfz r 1-5rrrrfnrLi of —SfMfr OR 4998 PG 866 Certificate of Merger f For Florida Limited Partnership or Limited Liability Limited Partnership The following Certificate of Merger is submitted in accordance with s. 620.2108, Florida Statutes. FIRST: The exact name, form/entity type, and jurisdiction for each mereina party are as follows: Name Jurisdiction Form/Entity Type Barron Collier Investments, Ltd. FL Limited Partnership Barron Collier Partnership, LLI=P SECOND: The e; as follows: Name Barron Collier P to Limited Partnership V ty type;" "r d urisdic on o the surviving party are i . J ict n t Form/Entity Tvpe Limited Partnership 4 t / THIRD: The date thi-rcr is effective under the g6rn�iiglaws of the surviving party is: (NOTE: If survivor is a Florida Iimil4 purtriershin or limited liability limited partnership, effective date cannot be prior to nor more than 90 days after the date this document is filed by the Florida Department of State. If survivor is not a Florida limited partnership or limited liability limited partnership, effective date shall be as provided in survivor's governing statute.) FOURTH: The merger was approved by each party as required by its governing law. 1 of 3 OR 4998 PG 867 FIFTH: If the surviving party is a foreign organization not qualified to transact business in this state, the street address and mailing address of an office which the Florida Department of State may use for the purposes of s. 620.2109(2), F.S., are as follows: Street address: [Not Applicable] Mailing address: SIXTII: Other proyisioris, if n lating to 2 of 3 OR 4998 PG 868 SEVENTH: Signature(s) for Each Party: (Merger must be signed by all general partners of Florida limited partnerships or limited liability limited partnerships and by the authorized representative of each other party.) Typed or Printed Name of Entity/Organization: Signature(s): Name of Individual: See attached signature page OR 4998 PG 869 SIGNATURE PAGE TO CERTIFICATE OF MERGER "MERGING PARTY" BARRON COLLIER INVESTMENTS, LTD., a Florida limited partnership By: Barron G. Collier III Lifetime Irrevocable Trust, dated December 13, 2012, as both �neral and a Limited Partner of BCI 4 co By: U X-` By: Juliet ` Dee4t Limited G. Sproul, Cc-T &" lee Gab e, Cc -Trustee �1 e�le berg, Co-T stee 11 3 3� ily Inheritance Trust, dated ,�q1l2, as both a General and a �df BCI orge, Trustee By: Lamar Gable Lifetime Irrevocable Trust, dated December 18, 2012, as both a General and a Limited Partner of BCI By: &e9V Bradley. . az, o-T teF47 By: Doug Baird, o- e By: Andrew R. Meulhnberiz. Co-Vrdstee 009596211 OR 4998 PG 870 OD958622.2 By: Frances G. Villere Lifetime Irrevocable Trust For Christopher D. Villere Family, dated June 13, 2011, as both a General and a Limited Part4Chrnistopp By: ' . Villere, Co -Trustee By: 'MNW A �-- Mathilde Villere Currence, Co -Trustee By: Robert Blakeslee Gable, Co -Trustee �res,_Villere Lifetime Irrevocable Trust rN&KUde Villere Currence Family, dated Jun 13,'gOl 1, as both a General and a —,---Limited Per`of BCI %ldelVillere Currence, Co -Trustee I cam. ariiar Ni"Jlere, Co -Trustee By: s 1 � tL Blakeslee Gable, Co -Trustee By: Frances.G. Villere Lifetime Irrevocable Trust For Lamar Gable Villere Family, dated June 13, 2011, as both a General and,a Limited Partner- of BCI By: La ar.G. Villere,_Co-T tee By: Christ her D. Villere, Co -Trustee By: Robert Blakeslee Gable, Co -Trustee 2 OR 4998 PG 871 By: Frances G. Villere Lifetime Irrevocable Trust For Christopher D. Villere Family, dated June 13, 2011, as both a General and a Limited Partner of BCI By: Christopher D. Villere, Co -Trustee By: Mathilde Villere Currence Co -Trustee By: A /� Robert Blakeslee Gable, Co -Trustee {R CVia.. Trust Fot< dated June By: By: llere Lifetime Irrevocable e Villere Currence Family, , 2 j 1, as both a General and a er of'BCI Currence, Co -Trustee Co -Trustee Co -Trustee By: Frances G. Villere Lifetime Irrevocable Trust For Lamar Gable Villere Family, dated June 13, 2011, as both a General and a Limited Partner of BC[ 1. By. Lamar G. Villere, Co -Trustee By: Christopher D. Villere, Co -Trustee By: Robert Blakeslee Gable, Co -Trustee 2 00958622.1 OR 4998 PG 872 (W566M.1 By: Phyllis G. Alden Lifetime Irrevocable Trust, dated April 07, 2011, as both a General and a Limited Partner of BCI r Barron Collier Ill, Co -Trustee By: LIN Katherine G. Sproul, Co -Trustee Robert Blakeslee Gable, Co -Trustee By: Donna G. Keller Lifetime Irrevocable Trust, ,dated December 14, 2012, as both a General and r �l Partner of BCT By: .-,.., Bracey A, Boaz, Co -Trustee n- L Robert, W �.» q E. Baird, Co -Trustee a Gable, Co -Trustee OR 4998 PG 873 By: Phyllis G. Alden Lifetime Irrevocable Trust, dated April 07, 2011, as both a General and a Limited Partner of BCI By: Barron Collier I11, Co-Tru t By: atherine G. Sproul, Co- s e By: 4� obert Blakeslee Gable, Co -Trustee a 4 BY-4 3 00958622.1 Lifetime Irrevocable Trust, 14, 2012, as both a General and r of BCI Co -Trustee OR 4998 PG 874 "SURVIVING PARTY' BARRON COLLIER PARTNERSHIP, LLLP, a Florida limited liability limited partnership By: Barron G. Collier III Lifetime Irrevocable Trust, dated December 13, 2012, as both a ne a LimitedPartner of BCP By: 'A' Katherine G. Sproul, Co-T ee 41fA obert Blakeslee Gable, Co -Trustee Co- Bj:",Juliet C._Sprootil Family Inheritance Trust, dated Seri er#012 as both a General and a J ,1'F' tedTa h&ofBCP Lin By: By: By: 4 00959622.1 Trustee r4a'16'Lifetime Irrevocable Trust, dated :firber 18, 2012, as both a General and a led Partner of BCP OR 4998 PG 875 00958622.1 By: Frances G. Villere Lifetime Irrevocable Trust For Christopher D. Villere Family, dated June 13, 2011, as both a General and a Limited Partner f BCP r I JJL'r By: 4Chriisto her D. �Villere, Co -Trustee By: Mathilde Villere Currence, Co -Trustee By: Robert Blakeslee Gable, Co -Trustee Frbj*0,-,,Q,Villere Lifetime Irrevocable TrusilF" TAittlii1de Villere Currence Family, dated 3'�O 11, as both a General and a kited P� P erof BCP AUtWldeNillere Currence, Co -Trustee �L'Vmar/dVlllere, Co -Trustee .A Blakeslee Gable, Co -Trustee BY: Frances-G. Villere Lifetime. Irrevocable Trust For Lama'r Gable Villere Family, dated June 13, 201.1, as both a General and a . Limit I ed Partner of BCP By: tee. e La ar.G ' Villere,.Co-Tt�-' B, Christop er D. Villere, Co -Trustee By: Robert Blakeslee Gable, Co -Trustee 5 OR 4998 PG 876 f By: Frances G. Villere Lifetime Irrevocable Trust For Christopher D. Villere Family, dated June 13, 2011, as both a General and a Limited Partner of BCP By: Christopher D. Villere, Co -Trustee By: Mathilldde Villere /jC�urrence, Co -Trustee B y: z Robert Blakeslee Gable, Co -Trustee yran�sVillere Lifetime Irrevocable Trust F N21 e Villere Currence Family, dated June pO1, as both a General and a Currence, Co -Trustee Co -Trustee Gable, Co -Trustee By: Frances G. Villere Lifetime Irrevocable Trust For Lamar Gable Villere Family, dated June 13, 2011, as both a General and a Limited Partner of BCP By: Lamar G. Villere, Co -Trustee M. Christopher D. Villere, Co -Trustee By: / i//f obert Blakeslee Gable, o-Trustee 5 O0958622.1 OR 4998 PG 877 00958622.1 By. Phyllis G. Alden Lifetime Irrevocable Tnist, dated April 07, 2011, as both a General and a Limited Partner of BCP BY: -`-%� �'��Ztl �-�� —,7T— Barron Collier III, Co -Trustee M. Katherine G. Sproul, Co -Trustee By: Robert Blakeslee Gable, Co -Trustee By: Donna G. Keller Lifetime Irrevocable Trust, datr d December 14, 2012, as both a General and �aMtitd Partner of BCP i t kq \q By: '~ 6 Bradley X Boaz, Co -Trustee 1 olas E. Baird, Co -Trustee y: Gable, Co -Trustee *** OR 4998 PG 878 *** By: Phyllis G. Alden Lifetime Irrevocable Trust, dated April 07, 2011, as both a General and a Limited Partner of BCP By: Barron Collier III, Co -Trustee By: Katherinee,GG.. Sproul, Co-Tru By: �j�� t Robert Blakeslee Gable, Co -Trustee Keller Lifetime Irrevocable Trust, �-cb0nber 14, 2012, as both a General and a Lim1t 4tl,er of BCP r° B'. Dol �'g a ,,._. By: le, Co -Trustee 6 00958622.1 I I � a�� �� ale I I J I xmHMw zm:.a�n'i��R`.`"m mR. t� xws.mw I..m.., iirv. { p i W a_s '£lli ���u+� ��8�� I I a�@'t'W I�@Lt r'.i°AWf. `66•: •. i,w`ti �.ry W � @ �ql � I+ $p g �: I � •W L 'i i ri i i !t � � e Ypa °r/� 'J t i i i <'�W 's ? i e ��' t i 4, 'r, @ °:•To-. i'r:"ki `� •°-i 11 `e i c •r, e,�,�IW W r W r21� 5''S5--,—�---- �fJ o; . iii �'1 • '� i s •°• I§ ----- mg$ 1& g& v`a tee./ / f iir, X✓i lgi� an �0'a0 ci �� �#� '���a v •@•°.ia,'�`e @'r.bi''rr'�R. 's 'r,@i'e is 's48 -�� eW "7e 'z4 W^'t� a iiJ �I\� �a m $ A / °---------- ----------------� /-------- - -----�:y --- ----`-------------- d,y --- —s• a b� / 4 _ ---- ----- - l — �z1---- " — — r— ----- — > n O -- ------ ----- -- ' V.------------y r?,- --_- e I / y-�i--------- --------*t•'--_-- / � I iW • W 4. � �, 'c i� i b •. A I My M ——— I/ 's ---- ----- ----- r----��----------"------ ----- -----' a. F R /� gym«« 6--------- - -- �`------------ ---�- --- —n---------:ram, I x n 'r. /—— -----��'�— _�JJ �`___@ .W a� a'R� I I // �'" mmm'mm swsszzi rv. vevmmmn-m-..w'°m''8 1F r, yd 11 2�A @@� MM mPggguggggRt "a%�$a A e ¢¢ =�8 a„ I iiz2s Nei as soa Rp Sk v&' i"-3 pad p $p�xp AE [$ 'py 1 Ax� a� I• Ilp W �� 8 $$ E8 &B S8 'v �" ."a� § § § 4 a �S $"-� I �r $ a3 3a ag :a m�rol /-F ,Wyk — SECTION 31 I � � cnxsox imw Oee®i1+T 22'c'o■C®c®. I $ Y mis n,a a by, o s. nxo, PSM. iTae 9 -; o: ^ nnE DAGOSTINO 6EOSPATIAL, INC.F�77] CERTFIED TO.a veePare-(,.v���j PNfmionAl SuN n &Mx In REDfANDS CHRISRAN MIGRANT ASSOCIATION, INCaioaizozo "mizsiz'l U/ lover am�m mama m., pRivs ,.ry [ ` �- J Sprin� COWER INSURANCE AGENCY, LLC, AND—asuxvsvoxnxo uoae[a i n xoPPer Tia. uwnw xo.ST 'p��zs/zfr- om PM1me: ON)35ti08S Wms'ne wmvaaggm,mm OLD REPUBLIC NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY � � x OF RCMA Immokalee MPUD N W ; E Z Westc. ox.S V.4, I � Ginger-LN a "-Tlf ° °- �, �kIronwood LN y ° [Eden AVIE G OC Curry�RD c' ° N R 3 T7 Subject Property t d �L 1 VLaWkeTrafl c BushST E P o/� kim mGradyMinor Civil Engineers • Land Surveyors • Planners • Landscape Architects 800 400 0 800 Feet 3.08.00 Environmental Data Purpose As per requirements in LDC Sections 3.08.00 and questions in the CU Checklist Preparation Of Environmental Data Preparation of Environmental Data, Environmental Data Submittal Requirement shall be prepared by an individual with academic credentials and experience in the area of environmental science or natural resource management. Academic credentials and experience shall be a bachelor's or higher degree in one of the biological sciences with at least two years of ecological or biological professional experience in the State of Florida Qualifications of Environmental Consultant Collier Environmental Consultants Inc. 2/96 - Present 3211 681h Street SW Naples, Florida 34105 Marco A. Espinar- Biologist Environmental Data. The following shall be submitted where applicable to evaluate projects. A) Wetlands i) Identify on Current Aerial / the location of all Collier County / SFWMD Jurisdictional wetlands according to the Florida Land Use Cover and Forms Classification System FLUCFCS RCMA Child Development Center and Community Hub is in Immokalee, Florida. The parcel is in Collier County Section 31, Township 46, Range 29. This project consists of approximately 62.2 acres. The project is located on Lake Trafford Road and east of CR 29. The project site consists mostly of pasture lands with some Slash pine uplands and two wetland areas. This project is currently being utilized a a cow/calf cattle operation. This project site is bordered by Lake Trafford Road to the south, Lake Trafford Elementary School to the west, Carson Road to the east and Curry Road to the north. This parcel is considered in the urban area of Immokalee. An exhibit depicting each FLUCCS Code with acreage has been provided B) Listed Species and Bald Eagle Nests and Nest Protection Zones i) Provide a wildlife survey for the nests of bald eagle and for listed species known to inhabit biological communities similar to those existing on site. The survey shall be conducted in accordance with the guidelines or recommendations of the FFWCC and the USFWS. Survey times may be reduced or waived where an initial habitat assessment by the environmental consultant indicates that the likelihood of listed species occurrence is low as determined by the FFWCC and USFWS. Where an initial habitat assessment by the environmental consultant indicates that the likelihood of listed species occurrence is low, the survey time may be reduced or waived by the County Manager or designee. Wildlife Listed Species Study (LDC 10.02.3.A.2.m) A brief examination of the parcel found no listed animals on site. However, Black bears are known to inhabit these areas. The site does provide some functional habitat for small, medium mammals and birds. A listed species study was conducted and attached. This project site is not in a panther consultation zone. During the Environmental Resource Permit process this project will be reviewed by the appropriate regulatory agencies. This project meets the Objective of CCME Objective 7.1. All proposed impacts are being directed towards the already cleared pasture areas. The majority of the areas that still have native habitat are proposed as preserve. CCME OBJECTIVE 7.1: Direct incompatible land uses away from listed animal species and their habitats. (The County relies on the listing process of State and Federal agencies to identify species that require special protection because of their endangered, threatened, or species of special concern status. Listed animal species are those species that the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission has designated as endangered, threatened, or species of special concern, in accordance with Rules 68A-27.003, 68A- 27.004, and 68A-27.005, F.A.C. and those species designated by various federal agencies as Endangered and Threatened species published in 50 CFR 17.) ii) Provide Listed Plants identified in LDC Section 3.04.03 See Attached Vegetation List / FLUCCS Code Map iii) Wildlife Management Plans in accordance with LDC Section 3.04.00 See Attached Listed Species Study, any required wildlife management plans may be required at the time of SDP. C) Native Vegetation Preservation i) For Sites or Portions of Sites Cleared of Native Vegetation or in Agricultural Use: Not Applicable ii) Identify on a current aerial the acreage, location and community types of all upland and wetland habitats on the project site, according to the FLUCFCS system and provide a legend foe each of the FLUCFS codes identified. Aerials and overlay information must be legible at the scale provided. Provide calculations for the acreage of native vegetation required to be retained on site. Include the above referenced calculations and aerials on the SDP or PPL. In a separate report, demonstrate how the preserve criteria pursuant to LDC section 3.05.07 have been meet. Location Maps / Aerials (LDC 10.02.3.A.2.m) Aerials and location maps have been provided. RCMA Child Development Center and Community Hub is in Immokalee, Florida. The parcel is in Collier County Section 31, Township 46, Range 29. This project consists of approximately 62.2 acres. The project is located on Lake Trafford Road and east of CR 29. The project site consists mostly of pasture lands with some Slash pine uplands and two wetland areas. This project is currently being utilized a a cow/calf cattle operation. This project site is bordered by Lake Trafford Road to the south, Lake Trafford Elementary School to the west, Carson Road to the east and Curry Road to the north. This parcel is considered in the urban area of Immokalee. See Attached Location Maps, Vegetation Maps / FLUCCS Maps Native Vegetation Calculation (LDC3.05.07.A.) 3.05.07 Preservation Standards The entire site consists of approximately 62.2 acres of which approximately 20.6 acres would be considered Native Habitat. The project is required to preserve 25 % and /or approximately 5.15 acres will be required. The current site plan shows 5.15 acres will be provided. This will be consistent with Goal 6 of Collier County GMP's Objective 6.1 Protect native communities through the application of minimum preservation requirements. Clearly identify the location of all preserves The preserve area has been identified on the site plan. Soil Ground Water Sampling Soil Boring will be conducted at the time at SDP as per LDC 3.08.00 A. 4. d (ii) An exhibit showing Collier County well field protection zones has been provided. RESUME RESUME Marco A. Espinar 3211 68 h St SW Naples, Fl 34105 Bilingual: English & Spanish Office: 239-263-2687 Home 239-263-2747 EDUCATION Cardinal Mooney High School Diploma 1980 Sarasota, Florida Manatee Junior College AA Degree 1982 Bradenton, Florida Biology University of South Florida BS Degree 1990 Tampa, Florida Biology Completed USF Cooperative Education Program April 1988 USF Undergraduate Research - USF 1985 Apalachicola Archaeological Expedition & Research - Lab Coordinator of Fauna Identification from Archeological Sites - Studies of Seagrass Beds (Thalassia testudinum) in Upper Tampa Bay, Florida - Growth Rates of Marine Algae ( Gracilaria tikvahiae, G. verrucosa, G. deblis Port Manatee, Florida EMPLOYMENT HISTORY & EXPERIENCE Collier Environmental Consultants Inc. Owner & Environmental Planning / Naples, Florida 2/96 - Present Biologist Environmental Permitting, Planning Vegetation Inventory Mitigation & Monitoring Plans Threatened and Endangered Species Survey Licensed Agent Gopher Tortoise Permitting, Testing, Relocation Exotic Plant Removal / Poisoning Mitigation Plantings Jurisdictional Determination Environmental Impact Statements Red Cockaded Woodpecker Survey UMAM Analysis BP- Natural Resource Advisor - Deepwater Horizon MS Canyon 252 Oil Spill Gulfport, Mississippi - Dauphin Island, Alabama - Pensacola, Florida Turrell & Associates Inc. Naples, Florida 2/94 - 12/95 Environmental Permitting, Planning Threatened and Endangered Species Survey Environmental Impact Statements Senior Environmental Planner Supervision of Staff Review Staff Reports South Florida Water Mana ement District Environmental Analyst Fort Myers, Florida 2/93 - 8/93 Dredge & Fill Permit Review Surface Water Permit Review Collier County Government Development Services Environmental Specialist II Naples, Florida 10/90 — 2193 Site Development Plan Compliance Planned Unit Development Compliance Site Drainage Inspections Southwest Florida Water Management District Tampa, Florida 9/87 —10/90 Landscape Inspections Environmental Enforcement Field Services Technician As -Built Inspections of Storm Water System - Engineering, Survey Surface and Ground Water Permit Compliance Well Construction & Abandonment Inspections Southwest Florida Water Management District (CO-OP) Environmental Scientists I Brooksville, Florida 1/86 - 9/87 Wetland Vegetation Studies At Major Well Fields Water Quality Sampling & Testing PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATIONS Southwest Florida Association of Environmental Professionals, Member Elected to very First Governing Board and served 2 terms, served on founding association — Bylaws Committee Appointed by the Board of County Commissioners and Served on the Collier County Environmental Advisory Board Appointed by the Board of County Commissioners and Currently Serving on the Development Services Advisory Committee Currently Serving on the Land Development Code Sub -Committee Appointed by the Board of County Commissioners and Served on Conservation Collier Land Acquisition Advisory Committee 6 years Served as Chairman of the Conservation Collier Lands Evaluation and Management Sub - Committee, Awarded for Ten (10) years of my Voluntary Service to Collier County By the Board of County Commissioners - January 2010 Awarded Outstanding Advisory Board Member Award - February 2009 by Collier County Board of County Commissioners Gopher Tortoise Management and Mitigation Professional Training Program Successful Completion 9/01 REFERENCES UPON REQUEST LOCATION Li a —14 ti -' _ _. -___ . _----..-::. :.—��lVarth_t5[h'Strget ■ ._ __,. '' -_`•� '° j.arna5 ,�mry_. - r � Um C�qh fto»0 - � om evl y b 4E J� aW ti F= 2 ❑ �t c: m 10/ 12/2020 Owner and Property Description Owner Name: BARRON COLLIER P'SHIP LLLP 2600 GOLDEN GATE PKWY # 200 Mailing Address: NAPLES FL 34105 USA Property Description Parcel Man Site Address: IMMOKALEE FL 34142 Subdivision: ACREAGE HEADER County: COLLIER .i Land Use Code: 60 Land Use Desc: Grazing land soil capability Class I Land Use FDOR 60 Code: Land Use 1=DOR Desc: Grazing land soil capability Class I Zoning: Acres: 63.7 PIN: 00071960001 P42i1IlistR'2i<I2 PIN2: 71960001 ALTKEY: 000100 004 51 F31 Last Data Update: 09/18/2020 Legal Description (not official) 3146 29 S112 OF NE114, LESS RNV, LESS OR 739-675, 730-906, 621-1273, 770- 196, LESS OR 2280 PG 762 Building Summary 2019 Certified Values Actual Year Built: Land: $494,070 Effect. Year Built: Land Agricultural- $0 Living SgFt: Building. $0 Total SgFt: Misc: $0 Adjusted SgFt: Just Value: $494,070 Beds: Assessed Value: $494,070 Baths: Stories: Num. of Buildings: Recent Sales Sale Date Book/Page Docnum Price Instrument Qualified Vac. or Grantor Impr. 2014-01-01 4998 / 865 $0 1998-12-21 24931 2779 $14,417,500 1982-06-01 9751674 $0 Sunbiz Corporate Data Title Name Address? city State Zip Code htfps.-llmaps.map wtse.cvmlfmo2/property info main.php?pinid=00071g600Q1$county=COLLIER&aggType=noagg&print=true& 17? 10/12/2020 Property Description Map Layer Stats Soils MUID Map Unit Name Component Component Hydric Hydric Percent c Name Pct Grp of Total 15 POMELLO FINE SAND POMELLO 98 NO A 0.1 CHOBEE, WINDER, AND 22 GATOR SOILS, CHOBEE 30 YES C/D 10.2 DEPRESSIONAL 7 IMMOKALEE FINE SAND IMMOKALEE 94 NO BID 89.7 TOTAL ACRES Land Cover 2017 (includes wetlands) LUCODE Description WMD YEAR Percent of Total 11 BO Residential, rural - one unit on 2 or more acres SFWMD 2014- 2016 0 1220 Medium Density, Mobile Home Units SFWMD 2014- 2016 0 1700 Institutional SFWMD 2014 0 2016 2110 Improved Pastures SFWMD 2014 65 2016 2130 Woodland Pastures SFWMD 2014- 20 2016 6172 Mixed Shrubs SFWMD 2014- 3 2016 6250 Hydric Pine Fiatwoods SFWMD 2014- 8 2016 6410 Freshwater Marshes SFWMD 2014- 2 2016 7400 Disturbed Lands SFWMD 2014- 0 2016 TOTAL ACRES Future Land Use FLU Code Description Jurisdiction County Percent of Total Urban Residential UNINCORPORATED COLLIER 100 Subdistrict TOTAL ACRES City Limits City name County Percent of Total Acres TOTAL ACRES Census Demographics Census Tract 12021011302 Acres 0.04 6.52 57.14 63.7 Acres 0 0.01 0.24 41.62 13.04 1.8 5.37 1.59 0.01 63.7 Acres 63.7 63.7 63.7 https://maps. mapwise, comifrno2/property_info_main.php ?pinid=00071960001&county=COLLIr=R&aggType=noagg&print=true& 212 FLUCCS MAP - VEGETATION INVENTORY FLUCCS CODE AND VEGETATION INVENTORY FLUCCS CODE (Description) Common Name Scientific Name Indicator Status 212 Unimproved Pasture The majority of this project site consist of this habitat. This habitat consists of pastures with fencing along the perimeter and some cross fencing. The area primarily consists of Bahia grass with other grasses. Bahia grass Paspalum notatum UPL Ragweed Ambrosia artemissiifolia FACT] wax myrtle Myrica cerifera FAC+ Broom sedge Andropogon virginicus FAC- Caesar weed Urena lobata FACU Ragweed Ambrosia artemisiifolia FACU Dog Fennel Eupatorium capillifolium FACU Guineagrass Panicum maximum FAC- 422 Brazilian Pepper These are small pockets of Brazilian pepper islands scattered throughout the site Brazilian pepper Schinus terebinthifolius Exotic Woman tongue Albizia lebbeck Exotic wax myrtle Myrica cerifera FAC+ Laurel oak Quercus laurifolia FACW salt bush Baccharis glomerulifolia FAC 411E3 Slash Pine Flatwoods Brazilian Pepper 50 — 75 % This habitat consists of a Slash pine canopy with cabbage palms and other species as midstory. Brazilian pepper is present at around the 50 — 75 % range. Slash pine carrotwood Brazilian. pepper Air potato j ava plum Cabbage palm palmetto Laurel oak Strangler fig Pinus elliotti FACW Cu paniopsis anacardioides Exotic Schinus terebinthifolius Exotic Dioscorea bulbifera Exotic Syzygium cumini Exotic Sabal palmetto FAC Serona repens FACU Quercus laurifolia FACW Ficus aurea FAC Myrsine Myrsine floridana FAC Beauty bush Callicarpa Americana UPL Dahoon holly Ilex cassine OBL wax myrtle Myrica cerifera FAC+ Broom sedge Andropogon virginicus FAC- Caesar weed Urena lobata FACU Winged Sumac Rhus copallina UPL Virginia creeper Ampelopsis quinquefolia FAC Cat -briar Smilax spp. FAC Poison ivy Toxicodendron radicans FAC Grape vine Vitis rotundifolia FAC Whitehead broom Spermacoce verticillata FAC Yellow eyed grass Xyris sp. OBL Beakrush Rhynchospora spp. FACW Beggers ticks Bidens alba FACW Ragweed Ambrosia artemissiifolia FACU salt bush Baccharis glomerulifolia FAC Goldenaster Pityopsis graminifolia UPL Rabbit tobacco Pseudognaphalium obtusifolium UPL 411 E4 Slash Pine Flatwoods Brazilian Pepper 75 —100 % This site consist of a Slash pine canopy just like above with a higher density of Brazilian pepper as midstory. Slash pine Pinus elliotti FACW Brazilian pepper Schinus terebinthifolius Exotic Cabbage palm Sabal palmetto FAC palmetto Serona repens FACU Laurel oak Quercus laurifolia FACW Strangler fig Ficus aurea FAC Myrsine Myrsine floridana FAC Beauty bush Callicarpa Americana UPL Dahoon holly Ilex cassine OBL wax myrtle Myrica cerifera FAC+ Broom sedge Andropogon virginicus FAC- Caesar weed Urena lobata FACU Winged Sumac Rhus copallina UPL Virginia creeper Ampelopsis quinquefolia FAC Cat -briar Smilax spp. FAC Poison ivy Toxicodendron radicans FAC Grape vine Vitis rotundifolia FAC Whitehead broom Spermacoce verticillata FAC Yellow eyed grass Xyris sp. OBL Beakrush Rhynchospora spp. FACW Beggers ticks Bidens alba FACW Ragweed Ambrosia artemissiifolia FACU 640 Carolina Willow 1 Red Maple Wetland This is a Carolina willow head with alligator flag. Brazilian pepper dominates the area. This area is adjacent to the borrow area and shows signs of soil disturbance. Brazilian pepper Schinus terebinthifolious FAC Carolina willow Salix caroliniana OBL primrose willow Ludwigia peruviana OBL Alligator flag Thalia geniculata OBL Button bush Cephalanthus occidentalis OBL sawgrass Cladium jamaicense OBL torpedo grass Panicum repens FACW Swamp fern Blechnum serrulatum FAC W+ elderberry Sambucus Canadensis FAC This is a Carolina willow head with alligator flag. Brazilian pepper dominates the area. This area is located towards the south east side of the project site. The area does have a dominance of air -potato and trash from the neighboring Handy Store. The site also has Java plum as an exotic. The area would be considered Jurisdictional Wetlands. Red maple Bay j ava plum Brazilian pepper Carolina willow primrose willow Alligator flag Pickerelweed Button bush sawgrass torpedo grass Swamp fern elderberry Hydrocotyle umbellate Persea palustris OBL Syzygium cumini Exotic Schinus terebinthifolious FAC Salix caroliniana OBL Ludwigia peruviana OBL Thalia geniculata OBL Pontederia cordata OBL Cephalanthus occidentalis OBL Cladium jamaicense OBL Panicum repens FACW Blechnum serrulatum FACW+ Sambucus Canadensis FAC Water pennywort FACW 6415 Dog Fennel Low Marsh - Wetland This is a wetland area located towards the south west side of the project site. The area is heavy grazed by cattle. This are would be considered Jurisdictional wetlands. Dog fennel Eupatorium capillifolium FACW sawgrass Cladium jamaicense OBL Pickerelweed Water pennywort Musky muint wiregrass Marsh Pink Broom sedge Torpedo grass Blue Maidencane Pontederia cordata OBL Hydrocotyle umbellate FACW Hyptis alata FACW Aristida stricta FAC- Sabatia grandiflora FACW Andropogon virginicus FAC- Panicum repens FACW Amphicarpum muhlenbergianum FACW 742 Borrow pit - Other Surface waters This is an open water body. The area was excavated and some of the fill placed adjacent to this pond. This was excavated as a cattle pond. 814 Wild Pines Stiff - leaved Recurved wired -leaved. Roadway Tillandsia fasiculata T. balbisiana T. setacea FDA/C FDA/T FDA/T ABREVIATIONS — Canopy (Cp), Midstory (M), Ground Cover (G) Dominant (D), Common (C), OccasionaI (0) INDICATOR STATUS - Obligate (OBL), Facultative wet plants (FACW), Facultative plants (FAQ, Upland (UPL) RCMA Child Development Center and Community Hub LISTED SPECIES SURVEY Collier County, Florida DECEMBER 2020 Prepared By: Collier Environmental Consultants, Inc. 3211 68' Street SW Naples, Florida 34105 (239) 263 - 2687 marcoe@prodigy.net INTRODUCTION: This report is an account of a Listed wildlife and plants species survey recently performed on 62.2 acre tract called RCMA Child Development Center and community Hub, Its purpose is to identify and describe key habitats and report any listed species using the site that would be at risk due to possible future development actions on the site. This survey and report is based on fieldwork performed during October - November 2020, DESCRIPTION: RCMA Child Development Center and Community Hub is in Immokalee, Florida (Collier County). The parcel is in Section 31, Township 46, Range 29 in Collier County. The parcel is located on the north side of Lake Trafford Road, east of County Road 29. The parcel is bordered by Lake Trafford Road to the south Carson Road to the east and Curry Road to the north. The parcel consists of 62.2 acres. The parcel is primarily vegetated as pasture lands. The site is currently being utilized for cattle grazing as a cow/calf operation. The following is a habitat breakdown. See Exhibit # I - Location Map FLUCCS HABITAT ACREAGE 212 Unproved pastures 39.9 422 Small Brazilian pepper patches 1.4 411 E3 Slash Pine Flatwoods BP Exotics 50 -75 % 11.1 411 E4 Slash pine flatwoods Bp exotics 75-100% 4.6 640 Carolina willow / Red maple wetland 2.4 wetlands 6415 Dog fennel low marsh grasses 2.5 wetlands 742 Borrow Pict — cattle pond 0.3 814 Roadway 0.0 TOTAL 62.2 acres LISTED SPECIES SURVEY: The required survey for a Listed Species Survey calls for a survey covering 100 % of the site, at prescribed transect distances per site acreage. Such a survey was conducted in October — November 2020. Established transects were oriented north - south and east - west and superimposed on an aerial map of the site. These transacts were attempted by ground - locating and walked by compass bearing. Straight transects were very difficult to walls in certain areas because of the Brazilian pepper density. The site was examined via straight and meandering transects with periodic stationary observations_ These transects were conducted Early morning (0730 - 1000), mid -day (1100 - 1500) and late - day (1500 -1800) time periods. This survey was conducted daily for several days. Some transects were interrupted by seasonal rains. All possible species of plants and animals listed by state and federal agencies were noted. In addition, to the transects walked stationary observation was periodically utilized. Careful observations noting calls, tracks, scat, roosting and nest sites were conducted. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Listed Flora Several Tiltandsia s . were seen on site. Refer to Exhibit # 2 - Cumulative Plant List Listed Fauna A description of the wildlife found onsite is provided below. Refer to Exhibit # 3 - Wildlife Species Observed Key Species Discussion : Taking into account the location and condition of the property and State and Federal. listed species that could be found on or around the site include: Red Cockaded Woodpeckers Red -Cockaded woodpeckers are known to inhabit Pine Flatwoods. Observations were keyed to searching for signs or calls of these animals. All mature pines were checked along the transect routes. Particular attention was paid to the south and west faces of the trees, as that seems to be the predominant location of cavity openings. No individuals or cavity trees were identified during this survey. Big Cypress Fox Squirrels Observations were keyed to searching for signs or calls of these animals, such as leaf nests in canopy trees or the distinctive chattering of territorial squirrels. No individuals were observed foraging and/or inhabit ting the subject parcel. No chewed pines found, Florida Black Bear No individuals were observed during this survey even though Black bears are known to inhabit the general area. Special attention was given for signs such as scraps, tracks and seat. This mammal has a large home range and is known to inhabit the general area. Bonneted Bat The Florida bonneted bat is the largest species of bat in Florida. Previously known as the Florida (Wagner's) mastiff bats these bats were reclassified as a separate species unique to Florida, The species can grow to a length of 6.5 inches with a wingspan of 20 inches. This is a flying mammal free to traverse great distances. Examination of all trees with potential cavities was conducted. The site does have a few dead pines trees. Special examination of all these trees were conducted. Specifically, these trees were examined for any cavities and/or snags. The density of Brazilian pepper in some areas and other midstory plants may impede flight patterns. No individuals and/or guano were found. This project is not anticipated to negatively impact the species. Florida Panther No individuals have been documented utilizing this project site or identified during this survey. This species does have a large home range and is known to inhabit surrounding areas_ The site is located within the lmmokalee urban area_ CONCLUSION: Transects were walked throughout the entire parcel. Stationary observations were also done through prime habitat areas. All transects were walked at varying times from post - dawn & mid -day to pre -sunset hours. This site is bordered by a school to the west, roadway to the south and homes to the north. The parcel is surrounded on all four sides by urban development. That said the area to the far west by Like Trafford and north are known t be inhabited by several large mammals. The actual parcel is limited. The parcel is mostly pasture and is currently being utilized as a cow/calf operation. The site does still have some native habitat. The parcel also has two wetland areas were wading birds can utilize. That said, urban development including a neighboring school do have a limiting factor for vertebrates. No listed animal species or signs thereof were identified on the property. A few Tillandsia's spp. was observed on site. Vertebrates - Threatened Endangered and Species of Special Concern species Present Absent Black bear x Florida panther x Everglades mink x Big Cypress Fox squirrel x Bonneted Bat x Indigo snake x American alligator x Gopher tortoise x Gopher Frog x Southeastern American kestrel x Red -Cockaded woodpecker x Florida Scrub Jay x Wood stork x Snail kite x Bald eagle x Limpkin x Osprey x White ibis x Tricolored heron x Snowy egret x Reddish egret x Little blue heron x Listed Vegetation Tillandsia spp. x it treet" �_ a v; cf••�•• �$Oittii'Aok2S Oriv2 ;Octre`TIth Streo e° M Taffy a4Q All M. a , 5`atouJuu S az W, Z<*= >1 -.' E 411 E4 422 742 —1:Z-. O \ / 411 E3 �415 814 s ® Gradyl/Iinor U R dy Allnar and goo Viatea Rly 3800 Via ael Rey RON 4pripp, Florida :19134 r:C 01 Engineers - La" Surveyors Manners Landscape ArchJtCek3 e.4- orAu1A. &6 agxii 5i I:ur. ninuU,, LB pM1.4, UvvUxf;x G: Z"Mg,266 Bon7ta .4prla9r RM.947.1144 I,- ro R Parr 4(jw : 2.39 690.43M k. $:•;fit � TT 212 �♦/ R � a, -r 422 .�i 411 E3 N 0 200' 400' SCALE: 1" = 400' RCMA Immokalee MPUD 8i r . - ,ov FLUCCS MAP EXHIBIT ° z11 Mg NAYS: fQm SHEET 1 OF P Myrsine Myrsine floridana FAC Beauty bush Callicarpa Americana UPL Dahoon holly Ilex cassine OBL wax myrtle Myrica cerifera FAC+ Broom sedge Andropogon virginicus FAC- Caesar weed Urena lobata FACU Winged Sumac Rhus copallina UPL Virginia creeper Ampelopsis quinquefolia FAC Cat -briar Smilax spp. FAC Poison ivy Toxicodendron radicans FAC Grape vine Vitis rotundifolia FAC Whitehead broom Spermacoce verticillata FAC Yellow eyed grass Xyris sp. OBL Beakrush Rhynchospora spp. FACW Beggers ticks Bidens alba FACW Ragweed Ambrosia artemissiifolia FACU salt bush Baccharis glomerulifolia FAC Goldenaster Pityopsis graminifolia UPL Rabbit tobacco Pseudognaphalium obtusifolium UPL 411 E4 Slash Pine Flatwoods Brazilian Pepper 75 —100 % This site consist of a Slash pine canopy jest like above with a higher density of Brazilian pepper as midstory. Slash pine Pinus elliotti FACW Brazilian pepper Schinus terebinthifolius Exotic Cabbage palm Sabal palmetto FAC palmetto Serona repens FACU Laurel oak Quercus laurifolia FACW Strangler fig Ficus aurea FAC Myrsine Myrsine floridana FAC Beauty bush Callicarpa Americana UPL Dahoon holly Ilex cassine OBL wax myrtle Myrica cerifera FAC+ Broom sedge Andropogon virginicus FAC- Caesar weed Urena lobata FACU Winged Sumac Rhus copallina UPL Virginia creeper Ampelopsis quinquefolia FAC Cat -briar Smilax spp. FAC Poison ivy Toxicodendron radicans FAC Grape vine Vitis rotundifolia FAC Whitehead broom Spermacoce verticillata FAC Yellow eyed grass Xyris sp. OBL Beakrush Rhynchospora spp. FACW Pickerelweed Water pennywort Musky mint wiregrass Marsh Pink Broom sedge Torpedo grass Blue Maidencane Pontederia cordata OBL Hydrocotyle umbellate FACW Hyptis alata FACW Aristida stricta FAC- Sabatia grandiflora FACW Andropogon virginicus FAC- Panicum repens FACW Amphicarpum muhlenbergianum FACW 742 Borrow pit - Other Surface waters This is an open water body. The area was excavated and some of the fill placed adjacent to this pond. This was excavated as a cattle pond. 814 Wild Pines Stiff - leaved Recurved wired -leaved Roadway ABREVIATIONS — INDICATOR STATUS - Tillandsia fasiculata T. balbisiana T. setacea FDA/C FDA/T FDA/T Canopy (Cp), Midstory (M), Ground Cover (G) Dominant (D), Common (C), Occasional (0) Obligate (OBL), Facultative wet plants (FACW), Facultative plants (FAC), Upland (UPL) WILDLIFE SPECIES OBSERVED Common Name species Amphibian & Reptiles: Brown anole Aeolis sagrei Birds: Dove- ground Columbina Passerina Dove- mourning Zenaida macroura Pileated woodpecker Dryocopiis i3ileatus Northern flicker Cola tes auratus Crow, American Corvus brach rh nchos Common grackle Quiscalus quiscula Bluejay C anocitta cristata Carolina wren LhrYothorus ludovicianus Gray catbird Dumetella carolinensis Northern mockingbird Mimus Polyglottos Cardinal Richrnondena cardinalis Brown thrasher Toxostoma rufurn Red -shouldered Hawk Biteo lineatus Vulture, turkey Cathartes aura Vulture, Black Coragyps atratus Cattle egret Bubulcus ibis Great Blue Heron Ardea herodius Mammals: Virginia opossum Didel his vir iniana Raccoon Procyon lotor Bobcat Felis rufus Hispid cotton rat Sigmodon his idus Nine -banded armadillo Dasypus noverncinctu Cottontail Rabbit S lvila us floridanus Status NUISANCE BLACK BEAR CALLS t vv- R l% 'ryRr "'ter Temve3 Ridge -it..A I Landing 1'j' R!1 f�` _ ` w f Swiders Pines i 'w Harvest For _ �' � !'.1r � J.• I: =1'..-,� fir i1 r 814 Ave ' ?*� 7tn Af D"ertport _ 1xa'U Rosa, Av' u; 'r Z A z z -- ._ !};'^. r....... L, ICI► //r T rt `� _ rt - .^:`.IriO l.n KC R _ _ !w rt rt SE .r ,,y W A4a 1^ 51 Mt.M 1��4r r z sr y s� 6I112021, 2:17:16 PM Black Bear Calls 1:18,056 0 0.17 0.35 0.7 mi 0 0.28 0.55 1 A km F7ooda Fish and Wildlfe Conservation Cttmmissino-Fish and Wildlife Research institute University of South Florida, County of Collier, Esri, HERE, Garmin, INCREMENT P. USGS, MSTf1NA5A, EPA, USDA 7RGIS user 3 II 'uj CL 1 s _ RV .ff Pal aafe�owwl O U N Q ru U a � a� uj a a� 0 SITE PLAN Ad 04:2 IZOZ 9Z S 0MO'Z2-NVId H3iSVW O it OIHX3 SONIMV2G ZZ810000ZOZld ZOfld 33lVNOWWI SONVI03H 1lVW> ONINNVId - POHd ONINNVId S31I3 lVOOI'W00 o a N W M Q Q J) W W s o M d Z LL Z F z CD < D _ w o w N Z Z Z avox NOSHVD LL O w w z C W � - p O — — z w w 0<wn wU) N D N D Z 2 w ZLl1 z aQ wwa H W Q Loo O? NN F� w � U N m \ W o w w w O 2 I m m Ln ozw Q ozw O =w o �5' WIDE TYPE'B' LANDSCAPE BUFFER p -1 LL Q w Q o _ �C00° H �¢m U > n W O J H w z W I W LL Z� �zUp o Q ` IL ww <w w -WU)Ww w I aO 1 �Q oo QC7z�Q 2U �z U o LL w a U a z Q a w U w O a¢ � LL, �a. �Z p a I =O U) N J l Q w w �' \ W p L>LI Z U) w ` d W Q D wQ J LL aO zp 0 O w m z w r e O w OD �wz< 2 a N= w U w a (� °d Q w Q U) I o cm �V�ww w ¢ Z V� g Q� w zw Q a.Q U = H a p Q U Q F c W W c ww I I y WW 00 j >Lu in z aw CD w w= ¢ H z ~ Z a g a zw o� �? ; z z 9 N =m N D W LU in um 0 EY w ON 0 I Q w > Z w Z w i i i i i i > � Q Q O U) d w > i > i i > > Z W' H N= �` mLL U� w > > > > s > > O Q< 1■ d = w W d Q �wa >Z ��p LU OV O m ¢ H > > > TA > > > NN D U �� aQ' LLa>O > i i Wi i i > JO Q nZ �F °Uww > > > > > > Fd J J LL J w Z Z) U) w w > i i i i i > 7 IQ Q Q} W Z K `" > > i i i i > O `� Z Utz (L s s > > s > O ZO� Z F- W W 15' WIDE TYPE'B' LANDSCAPE BUFFER > 0 w w O O ZONED:A � ZONED: LIBERTY LANDING RPUD USE: LAKE TRAFFORD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL p 0� U U USE: RESIDENTIAL IU W ®W-UU SOILS H H H H H H H H H COLLIER -COUNTY SOIL LEGEND REVISED 1 f 9 0 H. XAIMTAKI 2 $OLOPAW FS, LIMESTONE SUBSTRATUM 3 kALABAR FS 4 CHOBEE r LIMESTONE SUBSTRATUM AND DEPRESS -TONAL DAN2A MCTCXS 6 RIVIERA; , LIMESTONE StMSTRA 7 IMMOKALEE F.9 �M-COPELAND PS 3 MYAKKA FS L 0 OL DSMAA FS, LIMESTONE SUBSTRATU Li. �ANDALE FS M z4 PIN-EDA FS, LIMESTONE SUBSTRATUM IS POMELLO FS 6 OLDSMAR FS 17 BASINGER FS I8 RItiIERA FS, LIMESTONE SUBSTRATUM 0 FT. DRUM. AND -MAC ABAR_ HIGH- FS 1 BOCA FS 2 CHODEE, WINDER AND GATOR SOILS, DEPRESSIpNAL S HOC, R AND pKEELANTA 5 BOA, SOILS DEPRESSIONAL TVTERA, LIMESTONE SUBSTRATUM AND COPELAND FS DEPRESSIO�TAL 27 HOLOPAW FS 28 PINEDA AND RIVIERA FS 29 WABASSO FS 31 HILOL z 2 :2 2 2 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 0 - F3 Q _0 4, - 42 H 4-3 45 H 48 H 49 H 54 H 5I H S2 H 53 x 54 0 LIMESTONE SUBSTRATUM, JIIPITER AND MARGATE SOILS URBAN LAND BAN LAND HOLOPAw BASINGER COMPLEX URBAN LAND IMMOM21LBE OLDSMAR LIMESTONE SUBSTRA.TIIM COMPLEX THE SHAs COMPLEX ORGANIC SUBSTRATUM TUSCAWILLA FS RA CCOBI pDEMA�� LIMESTONE SUBSTRATUM LT B SATELLITE FS DUBBIN AND WULFERT MUCKS URBAN LAND SATELLITE COMPLEX �iVERAL BEACHES_ ASSaCIATION WINDER, RMTERA; LIMESTONE SUBST CIOBEE SOILS DEPRESSIONAL RATUM AND= PAOLA Fs (1-8 Percent slopes) PE"NSUCCO SOIL (marl P-rairie) HALLANDALE AND .BOCA FS (s10ugh) ` 'OCHOPEE FSL, PRAIRIE (marl) OCHOPEE FSL RESSDN MUCK FREQUENTLY FLOODED ESTERO AND PECKISH SOILS FREQUjENLy FLooD_ m JUPITER BoCA CoMPLEA BASINGER FS, "A,SION,LY -FLOODED] . HISTORICAL AERIALS ,M a ■ sa�Fan�.Yleilifbr6fL�' - - j _'„ HISTORICAL SEARCH This record search is for informational purposes only and does NOT constitute a Project review. This search only identifies resources recorded at the Florida Master Site File and does NOT provide project approval from the Division of Historical Resources. Contact the Compliance and Review Section of the Division of Historical Resources at Co_ m liiancePermits dos MyFlorida.com for project review information. December 16, 2020 Marco A. Espinar Collier Environmental Consultants Inc In response to your request on December 16, 2020, the Florida Master Site File lists no cultural resources recorded in designated parcel within T46S, R29E Section 31, Collier County, FL. When interpreting the results of our search, please consider the following informaation: • This search area may contain unrecorded archaeological sites, historical structures or other resources even if previously surveyed for cultural resources. • Because vandalism and looting are common at Florida sites, we ask that you limit the distribution of location information on archaeological sites. • While many of our records document historically significant resources, the documentation of a resource at the Florida Master Site File does not necessarily mean the resource is historically significant. • Federal, state and local laws require formal environmental review for most projects. This search DOES NOT constitute such a review. if your project falls under these laws, you should contact the Compliance and Review Section of the Division of Historical Resources at Com liancePermitsgdos.MyFlorida,com Please do not hesitate to contact us if you have any questions regarding the results of this search. Sincerely, C" Eman M. Vovsi, Ph.D. Florida Master Site File Eman.Vovsi _,DOS.M, F�da cam 500 South Bronough Street • Tallahassee, FL 32399-0250 www.flheritage.coin/preservation/sitefiile 850.245.6440 ph J 850.245.6439 fax j SiteFil4dos.stateAus . A- WELL FIELD PROTECTION ZONE MAP Collier County Well Field Protection Zones 2010 Well Field Protection Zones W - 1 Zone - 7 Year Travel Time Isocontour W - 2 Zone = 2 Year Travel Time Isocontour W - 3 Zane = 5 Year Travef Time Isocontour ImmolcaEee f i ` Well Field W - 4 Zone = 20 Year Travel Time Isocontour 2 I I Miles 8 Lee County - 1' Ave Maria -7 -- ---'_- Well Field Orangatree •fir" — Well Field Lee County 7 y s - — =r, i - § Collier County Ltililies Golden Gate •"' I ' ' I _ ."�, . fr' wl`•'"• �.._ _ Well Field�- pt � / 3 _ City of Naples Fast Golden Gate Well Field 'l • �A City of_ — Naples Coastal- RidSe Well Field- �� Collier County Utilities - - - ` '17-1— -1 - - Golden Gate- �S,i Y )� _ Well Field i IE ! Florida Governmental rt__ Utility Authority Golden Gate City --- — `^ Well Field w N i --•• r � 1 � i k i it III ._..... _ - -�. W E Well Field il eldas City I / 1 S � � • I � . _ r ir�C��` Ca14 County- r 1 t Port of the Islands rasrcro•unyt 's�rn�„ y� Well Field �f? - i•, aam, rb�.m.m DocuSign Envelope ID: 2COE14A8-91AA-4FE2-A6AA-B9449B5CF702 %TMB TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING, ]NC. TRAFFIC/TRANSPORTATtuN ENGINEERING & PLANNING SERVICES Traffic Impact Statement For RCMA Immokalee MPUD (Lake Trafford Road, Collier County, Florida) December 22, 2020 Revised April 6, 2021 County TIS Review Fees TIS Methodology Review Fee = $500.00 TIS (Major Study) Review Fee—$1,500.00 Prepared by: JMB TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING, INC. 4711 7TH AVENUE SW NAPLES, FLORIDA 341 19 CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION NO. 27830 (PROJECT No. Z❑ 1 C31 4) 'LAMES FLORID; DocuSigned by: {eg:':asRt:,�s^c'�Rr;ar. 1E519D679D23E47F 'I``�`'�M'_Q... � r *W� 43860TE OF �!RiU',- ATE B~ h. i DocuSign Envelope ID: 2COE14A8-91AA-4FE2-A6AA-B9449B5CF702 TABLE OF CONTENTS Conclusions 2 Methodology 2 Scope of Project 3 Table A - Proposed Land Use 3 Figure 1 - Location Map 3.1 Site Plan 3.2 Project Generated Traffic 4 Table C - Net New Site -Generated Trips 4 Table 1 - Trip Generations Computations 4.1 Existing + Committed Road Network 5 Project Traffic Distribution 5 Area of Significant Impact 5 Figure 2 - Project Traffic Distribution 5.1 Table 2 - Area of Impact/Road Classification 5.2 2020 thru 2023 Project Build -out Traffic Conditions 6 Table 3 - 2020 & 2023 Link Volumes 6.1 Table 4 - 2023 Link Volumes/Capacity Analysis 6.2 Appendix 7 1 DocuSign Envelope ID: 2COE14A8-91AA-4FE2-A6AA-B9449B5CF702 Conclusions Based upon the findings of this report, it was determined that the proposed RCMA Immokalee MPLTD will not have a negative impact upon the surrounding road network. It was verified that all roadways, within the project's area of influence, currently have a surplus of capacity and can accommodate the traffic associated with the proposed MPUD. As determined, the road network will continue to operate at acceptable levels of service for the foreseeable future and the project will not create any off -site transportation deficiencies that need to be mitigated. Site -Related Roadway Improvements The project will have access to Lake Trafford Road and Carson Road. Site -related improvements will be determined at the time of acquiring development permits. Methodology 4n December 16, 2020, a revised Traffic Impact Statement (TIS) Methodology Report was submitted to the office of Collier County Transportation Planning Department. The $500, 00 methodology meeting fee will be paid at the time of submitting the zoning application. A copy of the TIS methodology has been provided in the appendix (refer to pages Ml thru M11). E DocuSign Envelope ID: 2COE14A8-91AA-4FE2-A6AA-B9449B5CF702 Scope of Project RCMA Immokalee MPUD is a proposed multi -use project that will consist of 160 multi- family dwelling units, a K thru 8 private school (700 students), a day care (250 students) and a small-scale retail use (5,000 s.f.). The site is located on the northwest corner of Carson Road and Lake Trafford Road, within Immokalee. The project will have access to Lake Trafford Road and Carson Road. For additional details, refer to the site plan (refer to page 3.2). Table A Proposed Land Use Proposed Land Use Size/Units Multi -Family 160 d.u.'s Private School (K-8) 700 Students Day Care 250 Students Retail 5,000 s.£ i DocuSign Envelope ID: 2COE14A8-91AA-4FE2-A6AA-B9449B5CF702 0) N it vi NORTH N.T.S. Westclox St ��Oiy � ♦♦v Curry Rd ♦a� (P a N ♦♦`�L� 'Ao, ♦ 41 Lake Trafford Rd ♦♦CU C U) `♦ O co T ♦`♦♦ 0 a r rn immokalee Dr ♦♦'7� a � c i ♦�@ �o o) Roberts Ave�or71 F z Main St (SR 29 — Bos n e F-, L W. elaw re CloraoA Eustis Ave Carver St r rn � a� c� v Y LEGEND O E E 6-LANE ARTERIAL s 4-LANE ARTERIAL/COLLECTOR ----� 2-LANE ARTERIAL 2-LANE COLLECTOR/LOCAL RAIL ROAD - RR - MUTRANSPORTA'r10N EN 6IN EERFN G, INC. RCMA Immokalee MPUD Project Location & Roadway Classification FIGURE 1 December 12, 2020 3.1 DocuSign Envelope ID: 2COE14A8-91AA-4FE2-A6AA-B9449B5CF702 J ILL— uCw curio -IIINUn hI bUM JUAN 1IVIry J2j—INNVId — ri3bd nNINNtlIC 53t13 1YJ01 Yf�Q \ [� - z N LLF - mw w I g a a N r m w I � W e w m Z Z o�Lx UK& 1Y057IYJ 0 w w w .. Zw Zw I F-4 — O�j �i O�? N ui Z Da Co n L'j fy- o U wzuZ �co O< a ma}� r �m Q mzw Q Ozw I r15' �E TYPE'B' LANDSCAPE BUFFER m a , z 3 � ¢ rn 03 dam I U Lu Lu c9' �wz Luof - pLL zA uziv0 � I a� ' w m W W w Q Q U 0 I ` H �CL a a-R ¢Oz Q um LL, tY If i �O w I � wow �d Z wd (w} QO a O o ui N J z I O j Lu ul wQ ED- _7 0 Z ` !� Lu J�¢w Lu 1 I � U w wa. c Ld O w i U) O -Z LL lL I ❑ z w I Lu Q (D U g Z < z Q C) a ! I I w I Erw 53� — f (] C] Z w w O(o N Z fY I — cn Q I Q IW in l lu h` (L o w C-) ¢w �o� — w❑ Z Z, w b u7 N 0 H V U O 3 a 3 a a Q Q 2 w w > > 3 Z d z� °oma w > > 'tlj 3 QD wa 0 a > > w> > a > �It w �Uw� I ' CD w- ❑U)ui'w a a 3 a a > > w `.. > 3 3 > > > Z Q moi��i 15' WIDE TYPE'B' LANDSCAPE BUFFER ZONED: LIBERTY LANDING RPUD ZONED: A USE: RESIDENTIAL I USE: LAKE TRAFFORD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL Q LL, ¢ar O Z W Z wW ::) d O ,5; ni Q LLLI W0 0 Z 0 w U U W ,4I ®a,-UU .3a Z. DocuSign Envelope ID: 2COE14A8-91AA-4FE2-A6AA-B9449B5CF702 Project Generated Traffic Traffic that can be expected to be generated by the project was estimated based upon the guidelines established by the Institute of Transportation Engineers, Trip Generation Manual, 101h Edition. That is, historical traffic data collected at similar land uses were relied upon in estimating the project's traffic. It was concluded that land use codes Multi -Family (LUC 220), Private School K-8 (LUC 534), Day Care (LUC 565) and Variety Store (LUC 814) were most appropriate in estimating the site -generated trips. Note, the operator of the school has indicated that about 40°% of their students will either walk, ride bikes, ride a bus or will ride -share with the day care use- Therefore, the report conservatively reduced the estimated trips associated with the Private School (K-8) by 25% to reflect students using alternate means of travel or ride -sharing. Table B Net New Trips Generated AM Peak Hour (vph)h PM Peak Hour 742 424 The report concludes that the project will generate more than 100 net new trip ends during the weekday highest peak hour. As such, the report investigates the traffic impacts associated with the project based upon the criteria set forth by the Collier County Government's Traffic Impact Statement Guidelines for developments generating "more than 100 trips", which is defined as a major study. 4 DocuSign Envelope ID: 2COE14A8-91AA-4FE2-A6AA-B9449B5CF702 TABLE 1 TRIP GENERATION COMPUTATIONS RCMA Immokalee MPUD Land Use Code Land Use Description Build Schedule 220 Multi -Family (Low Rise) 160 Units 534 Private School (K - 8) 700 Students 565 Day Care Center 250 Students 814 Variety Store 5,000 s.f. Land Use Code Trip Period Trip Generation Equation Total Trips Trips Enter/Exit LUC 220 Daily Traffic (ADT) = T = 7.56(X) - 40.86 = 1,169 ADT AM Peak Hour (vph) = Ln(T) = 0.95Ln(X)-0.51= 75 vph 17 / 57 vph 23% Enter/ 77% Exit = PM Peak Hour (vph) = Ln(T) = 0.89Ln(X)-0.02 = 90 vph 57 / 33 vph 63% Enter/ 37% Exit = ** Trips Reduced by 25% for ped/bike and bus travel and ride -share w/ day care LUC 534 Daily Traffic (ADT) = N/A N/A ADT AM Peak Hour (vph) = T= 0.91(X) _ (253& Reduction) 478 vph 263 / 215 vph SS% Enter/ 45% Exit = PM Peak Hour (vph) = T= 0.63(X)-1.93 = (25% Reduction) 329 vph 155 / 175 vph 47% Enter/ 53% Exit = 4-6 PM Peak Hour (vph) = T= 0.26(X) _ (255vo Reduction) 137 vph 63 / 74 vph 46% Enter/ 54% Exit = LUC 565 Daily Traffic (ADT) = T= 4.09(X) = 1,023 ADT AM Peak Hour (vph) = T= 0.66(X) + 8.42= 173 vph 92 / 82 vph 53% Enter/ 47% Exit = PM Peak Hour (vph) = Ln(T) = 0.87Ln(X)+0.29 = 163 vph 77 / 86 vph 47% Enter/ 53% Exit = ********************************************************************************* LUC 814 Daily Traffic (ADT) = T= 63.47(X) = 317 ADT AM Peak Hour (vph) = T= 3.18(X) = 16 vph 9 / 7 vph 57% Enter/ 43% Exit = PM Peak Hour (vph) = T= 6.84(X) = 34 vph 18 / 16 vph 52% Enter/ 48% Exit = TOTALS AM Peak Hour (vph) = 742 vph 381 / 361 vph 4-6 PM Peak Hour (vph) = 424 vph 214 / 210 vph DocuSign Envelope ID: 2COE14A8-91AA-4FE2-A6AA-B9449B5CF702 Existing + Committed Road Network Figure 1 and Table 2 depict the E + C road network. As shown, there are no significant 5- year committed roadway improvements within the project's area of impact. Project Traffic Distribution The project's traffic was distributed to the surrounding roadway network based upon logical means of ingress/egress, current and future traffic patterns in the area and residential densities. Figure 2 and Table 2 provide a detail of the traffic distributions based on a percentage basis. Table 2 also depicts the project traffic by volume. Area of Significant Impact The area of significant impact was determined based upon Collier County's 2%, 2% and 3% criteria (i.e., if the project's traffic is 2% or more of a roadway's adopted level of service capacity, then the project has a significant impact upon that link). Table 2 describes the project traffic distributions and the level of impact on the surrounding roadways. Roads that were identified as being within the projects area impact are shown in Table 2. IDocuSign Envelope ID: 2COE14A8-91AA-4FE2-A6AA-B9449B5CF702 LV vi NORTH I N.T.S. 4♦ Westclox St to ry Rd 0ij �0 c O 5% — 6► Lake Trafford Rd �\ N a v .� -5 LO in U.i N z _ z "L z 2�0� f Immokolee Dr�� o � i Roberts Ave ]%%. z i Main St (SR 29)Bosto -�-F f t� -- Ave W_ Eustis M LEGEND 0�� PROJECT TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION BY PERCENT M -r KAkNSPDRTATruN ENGINEERING, ENG. 0 -ri St RCMA Immokalee MPUD Project -Generated FIGURE 2 Traffic Distribution April 6, 2021 o «sign Envelope ID: 2 0@4A $g1AA4FE2 GeAAakge c99 k- S ILO, o f C 7— 2 » 2 � 2�0 " d $ 7 I a ƒ a / IL — + a M2 Cj n 5 q n n AIL 7 cjag n L z & a- 2 \ ±kRn an00 . a CL ' L C%j= CI) L 0 z o§ z a w n a 0. a � U mLIS 2 a » LL 0 G $ v o (.0 LO r � � �e$� N e� W ± g ■ e \ D o \ > k \ k k W -i (L /00 0 c 00 c C CL 2 Co k\ (d q = 2 J q Z) a O D w _ w § w Vo � CN 6 $ E 6 m % :6z- \ f§ 7 R a® m t g ) m / § § § \ e ) 0 / w i § � OD? CD 0 2 k k e ] o o N m _ w § 0 § ) ) 0 . J ] $ k 9L / } g 2 g 9 3 m _ 2 DocuSign Envelope ID: 2COE14A8-91AA-4FE2-A6AA-B9449B5CF702 2020 thru 2023 Project Build -out Traffic Conditions In order to establish 2020 thru 2023 project build -out traffic conditions, two forecasting methods were used. The first traffic forecasting method was the County's traffic count data was adjusted for peak season conditions, peak hour conditions, peak direction, and an annual growth rate was then applied. The peak season/peak hour/peak direction factor and annual growth rate were obtained from the 2020 Collier County AUIR Report. Using the annual growth rate, the 2023 background traffic conditions were determined, which are depicted in Table 3. The second traffic forecasting method was to add the vested trips (trip bank) identified in the 2020 AUIR report to the adjusted peak season, peak hour and peak direction traffic counts. The 2020 vested trips 'Y' background traffic volumes are depicted in Table 3. The greater of the two values produced by the forecasting methods was then considered to reflect the 2023 background traffic. The net new project generated traffic was then added to the background traffic. Table 4 provides a summary of the 2020 thru 2023 traffic conditions and the roadways' level of service and remaining available capacity. As shown, all project impacted roadways will continue to operate at the County's adopted minimum level of service thresholds at project build -out. G o «sign Envelope ID: 2 0@4A $g1AA4FE2 GeAAakge c99 k. § 0 a a n) g J _ 2 / o a=® ® 2 a ° eq_-V to % G I- q $ a I IL � / 2 j § / / o » k cri W J o a ® ® m 0 J 7 k« 2 n k / k 0 CL � » § Y z � 2 w w a w n J � § K z = _ NCCD, Q cli� S R q# 04 r G toN � O § o N f E m m 2 R a k ) m ® CN \ § uj \ \ j \ \ i § '0 § 0 7 0 k E 2 a 2 k J j J \ \ k § �.� oms)nEnvelope ID: 2o@4A$g1AA4FE2- AAa9449ec99 m 0 / - m k 2.6 7 m 0 m e 0 � 2 In (L o § oƒ t g 6 > o R o @ = o W 9 \ § 2 o 00 0 0 a. ) I§ o 0 0 0CD IL I (0 2 G f \ a > 2 � § 9 0 g ƒ I ) m / ( a � CL ' Q ƒ 6 R n L 2 z u Z � � R - $ z R n c m U z M k LU ® * Q _ U ■ ± A � LU 7 # � a I '' §{ m R m u m o m f Se (L a 2 eCL n k 2 2 o R k CI4 r p § D IL co' Q 0 m Q m m m o ° _ cm§ \ \ § k § W f » a � I / § E m R % 0 % 2 = < ® m \ J @ ¢ R j a 7 \ 2 ) ° k j 0) / \ \ / � DocuSign Envelope ID: 2COE14A8-91AA-4FE2-A6AA-B9449B5CF702 APPENDIX Support Documents nnciiSinn Fnvalnna in. qr,.nF1AAR_Q9AA_AFF9_AF,AA_RQAAQR5rF7nq %TMB TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING, INC. TRAFFIC/TRANSP❑RTATI❑N ENGINEERING & PLANNING SERVICES Traffic Impact Statement Methodology For RCMA Immokalee MPUD (Lake Trafford Road, Collier County, Florida) December 4, 2020 Revised December ib, 2020 Countv TIS Review Fees TIS Methodology Review Fee = $500.00 TIS (Major Study) Review Fee=$1,500.00 Prepared by: V MB TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING, INC. 4711 7TH AVENUE SW NAPES, FL❑RIDA 341 19 CERTIFICATE ❑F AUTHORIZATI❑N NO. 27830 (PROJECT NO. 201 01 4) JAMES W BANKS, P.E. DATE FL❑RI REG. No. 43860 W DocuSign Envelope ID: 2COE14A8-91AA-4FE2-A6AA-B9449B5CF702 APPENDIX A INITIAL MEETING CHECKLIST Suggestion: Use this Appendix as a worksheet to ensure that no important elements are overlooked. Cross out the items that do not apply. Date: 12-4-2020 Revised 12-16-2020Time: Location: Collier County Government Offices (North Horseshoe Drive) People Attending: Name, Organization, and Telephone Numbers 1) James M. Banks, JMB Transportation Engineering, Inc., 239-919-2767 2) Michael Sawyer, Collier County Government 3) 4) Study Preparer: Preparer's Name and Title. James M, Banks, P.E., President Organization. JMB Transportation ELigineerigg, Inc. Address & Telephone Number: 4711 7th Avenue SW Naples, Florida 34119 (239)-919- 2767 _Reviewer(s): Reviewer's Name & Title: Michael Sa er Collier County Transportation Division Applicant: Applicant's Name: Address: Telephone Number: Proposed Development: Name: RCMA Im xokalee MPUD Location: Northwest corner of Carson Road & Lake Trafford Road Land Use Type: Multi -Family 160 dwelling units Private School K-8 700 students Dqy Care 250 students and Retail 5 000 L ITE Code #: LUC 220, 534, 565 and 814 Proposed number of development units: See above Other: Description: Zoning: Existing: Vacant Comprehensive plan recommendation: Requested: Findings of the Preliminary Study: See the attached C.IUsersymhswWasktop4COLLIEfi1201014 Redlands Chnslran MfgrantsVNethodofog�Reportdoc DocuSign Envelope ID: 2COE14A8-91AA-4FE2-A6AA-B9449B5CF702 Study Type: Major TIS Study Area: Boundaries: Based upon the County's 2%, 2% & 3% impact rule. See attached Additional intersections to be analyzed: None Horizon Years): 2023 Analysis Time Period(s): PM Peak Future Off -Site Developments: None Source of Trip Generation Rates: ITE Trip Generation Manual, IOth Edition (Table 1) Note:_4" 25% reduction in K-S Private School trips due to ped/bike, bus travel and shared trips with day care. Reductions in Trip Generation Rates: Pass -by trips: None Internal trips (PUD): Transmit use: Other: Note: 4" 25% reduction in K-S Private School trips due to ped/bike, bus travel and shared trips with day care. Horizon Year Roadway Network Improvements: Collier County's 5-year CIE. Methodology & Assumptions: Non -site traffic estimates: See Attached Site -trip generation: See Table 1 Trip distribution method: Based a on manual assignment See Table 2 & Figure 2 Traffic assignment method: Traffic growth rate: Per Collier CoupHistorical & Current AUIR Reports, but not less than 2% or background or vested trips method, whichever is greater. C:1UsersynaLsx+�asxtopiCOLLlER12DI01a Redlands Chnsfian KgrantswethodolagyRepartaoc M3 DocuSign Envelope ID: 2COE14A8-91AA-4FE2-A6AA-B9449B5CF702 Special Features: (from preliminary study or prior experience) Accidents locations: Sight distance: Queuing: Access location & configuration: Traffic control: Signal system location & progression needs: On -site parking needs: Data Sources: Base maps: Prior study reports: Access policy and jurisdiction: Review process: Requirements: Miscellaneous: Small Scale Study — No Fee i Minor Study - $750.00 Major Study - $1500.00 X Includes 2 intersections Additional Intersections - $500.00 each None All fees will be agreed to during the Methodology meeting and must be paid to Transportation prior to our sign, -off on the application. Reviewers Applicant C.1Users0MvADesktop1G0LLJEW01014 Rec ands Chdsfim MkmntsWs#wdoiogWReportdoc M+ DocuSign Envelope ID: 2COE14A8-91AA-4FE2-A6AA-B9449B5CF702 j NORTH tt N.T.S. Westclox St Curry Rd 0 do �o,� `•� Lake Trafford 0_ Rd � �`. Or C (n C 00 a D U z z Immokalee Dr Main St (SR U) rn Rcberts Ave z W. DelawbredI TO Cc lora o A (f) istis Ave Carver St rn � Of V a� v O LEGEND E E 6-LANE ARTERIAL 4-LANE ARTERIAL/COLLECTOR ----- 2-LANE ARTERIAL 2-LANE COLLECTOR/LOCAL RAIL ROAD - - 'YIYiDTKANSF'L]KTATI4N ENGINEERING, ENG. RCMA lmmokalee MPUD Project Location & December 12, Zaza Roadway Classification FIGURE 1 DocuSign Envelope ID: 2COE14A8-91AA-4FE2-A6AA-B9449B5CF702 0 0 maer n� o Q z Lu T- D E p C, U w� W z Ll! z '—fYWIDE TYPE 'B' LANDSCAPE BUFFER Z I Lu u.s LL PLL I .w ' o } W LY d 4 z L1J ' w a m O co 1 F Z ■ 7 N c Q V LL W Q� Lu 0 i U _ n- o, I 3 W _ ❑ m Z ❑D a}w w■ F a 0U3 #- oviw N� 0z� Z � ' ¢ in I I va �a w O m ow ��z� Lu Lu Q � F 6 a W U) ' � ' pw 0 0) ND ND }� Q w z �u- Z2 WCD 2 z 0- m 7 z W W Lu a a a �¢ O �L) M a w ozw JLL !L C, m Ji z O (}1 Lu � Z. W JLL Ly O N D m ❑ � w - a W � a F p 0) I= a a a a a a >z o�w �La?O a a a a a ❑ 7 W - Q LL Z? a w D W W z Lii 1 � � m Z 3 a a a d z 3 a 3 a a a ' Wa 'j a i a a 3 i 3 i 9 j a +§ 4 3 a a 3 a j a j 3 a 3 a a a a a a i 15' WIDE TYPE'B' LANDSCAPE BUFFER ZONED: LIBERTY LANDING RPUD ZONED: A USE: RESIDENTIAL I USF: LAKE TRAFFORD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL I I i I U I � I � o' I ❑Lu I 0 C? Q W d � O Lu � I W Q Q uj I D N �W W U U �I H Z fIIJ 71 W I J Q H z Lu U) W ❑° �o v.L w p OQ Q � as w Q � N 7 H U Q J Ll LDZ0�z ;=wu�� ¢©2EME ww00 ❑IYUU M6 DocuSign Envelope ID: 2COE14A8-91AA-4FE2-A6AA-B9449B5CF702 TABLE 1 TRIP GENERATION COMPUTATIONS RCMA Immokalee MPUD Land Use Code Land Use Description Build Schedule 220 Multi -Family (Low Rise) 160 Units 534 Private School (K - 8) 700 Students 565 Day Care Center 250 Students 814 Variety Store 5,000 s.f. Land Use Code Trip Period Trip Generation Equation Total Trips Trips Enter/Exit LUC 220 Daily Traffic (ADT) = T = 7.56(X) - 40.86 = 1,169 ADT AM Peak Hour (vph) = Ln(T) = 0.95Ln(X)-0.51 = 75 vph 17 / 57 vph 23% Enter/ 77% Exit = PM Peak Hour (vph) = Ln(T) = 0.89Ln(X)-0.02 = 90 vph 57 / 33 vph 63% Enter/ 37% Exit = ** Trips Reduced by 25% for ped/bike and bus travel and ride -share w/ day care LUC 534 Daily Traffic (ADT) = N/A N/A ADT AM Peak Hour (vph) = T= 0.85(X) + 22.17 = (2551o' Reduction) 463 vph 255 / 208 vph 55% Enter/ 45% Exit = PM Peak Hour (vph) = T= 0.63(X)-1.93 = (25% Reduction) 329 vph 155 / 175 vph 47% Enter/ 53% Exit = 4-6 PM Peak Hour (vph) = T= 0.26(X) = (25% Reduction) 137 vph 63 / 74 vph 46% Enter/ 54% Exit = LUC 565 Daily Traffic (ADT) = T= 3.56(X) + 47.23 = 937 ADT AM Peak Hour (vph) = T= 0.66(X) + 8.42= 173 vph 92 / 82 vph 53% Enter/ 47% Exit = PM Peak Hour (vph) = Ln(T) = 0.87Ln(X)+0.29 = 163 vph 77 / 86 vph 47% Enter/ 53% Exit = LUC 814 Daily Traffic (ADT) = T= 63.47(X) = 317 ADT AM Peak Hour (vph) = T= 3.18(X) = 16 vph 9 / 7 vph 57% Enter/ 43% Exit = PM Peak Hour (vph) = T= 6.84(X) = 34 vph 18 / 16 vph 52% Enter/ 48% Exit = TOTALS AM Peak Hour (vph) = 727 vph 373 / 354 vph 4-6 PM Peak Hour (vph) = 423 vph 214 / 210 vph M-7 IDocuSign Envelope ID: 2COE14A8-91AA-4FE2-A6AA-B9449B5CF702 Westclox St \7., Curry Rd c10 Lake Trafford RdOf ,, `a to rn � � Z Z Z "07- Immokolee Dr lj Roberts Ave z � z 7— Main St (SR 29) Eustis . M LEGEND 00 0% PROJECT TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION BY PERCENT %MTRANSPDRTATION ENGINEERING, IND. C/ N-I1 M arver St -v o: a� a� 0 0 NORTH I N_T.S_ RCMA Immokalee MPUD Project -Generated FIGURE 2 Traffic Distribution December 12, 2020 o «sign Envelope ID: 2 0@4A $g1AA4FE2 GeAAakge c99 k® b / G b o E » » 2 ¥ 2 m § ) ƒ + y a k e ® n 2 \ / / ƒ R� n A a n ■ � cb m w a z LU z � 0) r r w o $ ' c 2 — COa § z f% z « _ = k a L � U IL7���c �n 2 a � a » U. \ k \ \ * \ * Q Ia�an n © � N W§ L .2 © / j k k / / / { 0 c W / � k c Q 00 e � � 2 / 0 / / 'r Fj \ w LLI #o N C14 c 2 — \ m \ k � r 2 o 2 < m m g % § m f R § ) § ¢ = n ' v / 0 R t -1 § w e k % \ 'a m z § / @ @ 2 o 2 £ m r 2 ; § ) 0 k \ 0- � J ] 2 J CD@ 0 0 0 co § � f M 9 o «sign Envelope ID: 2 0@4A $g1AA4FE2 GeAAakge c99 § ■ 0 c $ 0 t J = I R 2 2 G k r/ § \ " CD 0 m (L � 2 § ° » � ) � § 2 ) ) J o « §n % / \ \ CDC4 kIL �c 2 & � $ _Z \ a % / \ \ M � W J � C z L V Q � ■ ® � D 2 9 k \ §) j N - » � O � N o O ; N 2 E j § 2 m \ / \ § / j \ ) 0 \ \ \ ) \ 2 ¥ � � o ) t e o £ § k ) -j a)3 L) I?� « \ G m 2 MID oms)nEnvelope ID: 2o@4A$g1AA4FE2- AAa9449ec99 ® 9 I u m ] o m U m a Q 2 t] a �c � �) o n 2 o 2 i g(N § a co co § ®- 2 ; 0 6 o a a m a a � } § ) o 2 § \ } a > OD A 7 c \ / \ � ƒ a > Q � /§ d m k z w Z z � R } .0i V) © E � \ > c $ 2 CL z CCL a z a w to » C)_±§7� W /a.— b �� � D ; a 2 Q 0 J ■ ■ o m in § a m -i � � ° ' �7 n § ƒ \ \ \ § j / § > � a m / ■ o ca a m N )§ � N CD f § \ \ ~ \ I f > a $ ca 0 E 65 ¥ E 2 $ 2 2 m k ) < f m Z k « \ % 0 j \ \ 2 4 2 V 2 p 0 % 2 a § k \ o g 9 @ o $ & 7 % - #111 COLLIER COUNTY WAIVER APPLICATION FROM THE REQUIRED HISTORICAL AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY AND ASSESSMENT DATE SUBMITTED: PLANNER: PETITION NUMBER ASSOCIATED WITH THE WAIVER: PL20200001827 (To Be Completed By Zoning and Land Development Review Staff) PROJECT NAME: RCMA Immokalee MPUD LOCATION: (Common Description) The subject property is located on the northwest Quadrant of Trafford Lake Road and Carson Road. SUMMARY OF WAIVER REQUEST: The proposed MPUD site is 63± acres and is currently undeveloped. The property has historically been used for agricultural purposes. The Archaeological Probability Map #13 shows the project is not located in an area that indicates areas of Historical/Archaeological _ probability or known sites. The project is located in Section 31. Township 46 S. Ranize 29 E on the north side of Lake Trafford Road. (Properties located within an area of Historical and Archaeological Probability but with a low potential for historical/archaeological sites may petition the Community Development & Environmental Services Administrator County Manager or designee to waive the requirement for a Historical/Archaeological Survey and Assessment. Once the waiver application has been submitted, it shall be reviewed and acted upon within five (5) working days. The waiver request shall adequately demonstrate that the area has low potential for historical/archaeological sites.) Historic Preservation/Forms/rev. 06/05/08 SECTION ONE: APPLICANT AND PROPERTY OWNERSHIP DATA A. Name of applicant (s) (if other than property owner, state relationship such as option holder, contract purchaser, lessee, trustee, etc.): Redlands Christian Migrant Association, Inc., Contract Purchaser Mailing Address: 402 W. Main Street, Immokalee FL 34112 Phone: E-Mail: mikeghfarchitects.net FAX: B. Name of agent(s) for applicant, if any: D. Wayne Arnold, AICP Mailing Address: Q. Grady Minor and Associates, P.A., 3800 Via Del Rev, Bonita Springs, Florida 34134 Phone: 239.947.1144 FAX: 239.947.0375 E-Mail: warnold(&,gradyminor.com C. Name of owner(s) of property: Barron Collier Partnership LLLP Mailing Address: 2600 Golden Gate Parkway, Naples FL 34104 Phone: 239-262-2600 FAX: E-Mail: DGensongbarroncollier.com Note: If names in answers to A and/or B are different than name in C, notarized letter(s) of authorization from property owner (C) must be attached. SECTION TWO: SUBJECT PROPERTY DATA (Attach copy of the plat book page (obtainable from Clerk's Office at the original scale) with subject property clearly marked.) A. Legal description of subject property. Answer only 1 or 2, as applicable. 1. Within platted subdivision, recorded in official Plat Books of Collier County. Subdivision Name: N.A. Plat Book N.A. Page N.A. Unit N.A. Tract N.A. Lot N.A. Section 31 Township 46S Range 29 E 2. If not in platted subdivision, a complete legal description must be attached which is sufficiently detailed so as to locate said property on County maps or aerial Historic Preservation/Forms/rev. 06/05/08 photographs. The legal description must include the Section, Township and Range. If the applicant includes multiple contiguous parcels, the legal description may describe the perimeter boundary of the total area, and need not describe each individual parcel, except where different zoning requests are made on individual parcels. A boundary sketch is also required. Collier County has the right to reject any legal description, which is not sufficiently detailed so as to locate said property, and may require a certified survey or boundary sketch to be submitted. B. Property dimensions: Area: 2,744,280 square feet, or 63± acres Width along roadway: 2,291± feet (41h St. N.E.) and 2,670± feet (Immokalee Road) Depth: I C. Present use of property: Undeveloped agricultural land D. Present zoning classification: A (ST/W-I through ST/W-4) SECTION THREE: WAIVER CRITERIA Note: This provision is to cover instances in which it is obvious that any archaeological or historic resource that may have existed has been destroyed. Examples would be evidence that a major building has been constructed on the site or that an area has been excavated. A. Waiver Request Justification. 1. Interpretation of Aerial Photograph Photo shows property undeveloped and portions cleared for agricultural use. 2. Historical Land Use Description: Undeveloped agricultural. 3. Land, cover, formation and vegetation description: The parcel contains vegetation on the western side of the property and in the southeast corner, the remainder of the property is sporadically vegetated. 4. Other: B. The County Manager or designee may deny a waiver, grant the waiver, or grant the waiver with conditions. He shall be authorized to require examination of the site by an accredited archaeologist where deemed appropriate. The applicant shall bear the cost of such evaluation by an independent accredited archaeologist. The decision of the County Manager or designee regarding the waiver request shall be provided to the applicant in writing. In the event of a denial of the waiver request, written notice shall be provided stating the reasons for such denial. Any party aggrieved by a decision of Historic Preservation/Forms/rev. 06/05/08 the County Manager or designee regarding a waiver request may appeal to the Preservation Board. Any party aggrieved by a decision of the Preservation Board regarding a waiver request may appeal that decision to the Board of County Commissioners. SECTION FOUR: CERTIFICATION A. The applicant shall be responsible for the accuracy and completeness of this application. Any time delays or additional expenses necessitated due to the submittal of inaccurate or incomplete information shall be the responsibility of the applicant. B. All information submitted with the application becomes a part of the public record and shall be a permanent part of the file. C. All attachments and exhibits submitted shall be of a size that will fit or conveniently fold to fit into a legal size (8 %2" x 14") folder. Signature of Applicant or Agent D. Wayne Arnold, AICP Printed Name of Applicant or Agent -TO BE COMPLETED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION - SECTION FIVE: NOTICE OF DECISION The County Manager or designee has made the following determination: ❑ Approved on: By: ❑ Approved with Conditions on: By: (see attached) u Denied on: _ (see attached) LIN Historic Preservation/Forms/rev. 06/05/08 4 RNG 28 I RNG sH a 7 11 1? 8 i 9 10 11 12 I♦ 14 1341 14 13 16 e,� 17 16 1`, 4 23 24 19 20 :'I 23 24 2G 25 30 9 2g� 27 26 25 Subject Property --- 7V7 ebb 3 N 32 33 �r 34 35 36 �a NFUI -M-N. Sit 840 4 1 1 I b 9 0 1 sa 3 • m 4 ` 18 17 16 20 0w ^ 1 4 la 24 2 1 24 19 22 23 .. PRPMURY s1A.EM P W PREmvAY StnwyEO MG -W.WUI pCATFS S O! H6TCfd0AL/MGW:OLOG k PRG91 L[ INCICATE5 1MMOIC STNUCTT.RE (NOT Tu W-AW • t4DKATES HiCWEttOOCAL SITE (NOT TO SCALE) INDICATES IIR70MC USTRET I IRM01 AREAS 0N' 111 iM r_4aoo' TWP 46 rWP 47 Historic Preservation/Forms/rev. 06/05/08 j/%•� VON" , %% • % i �, RCMA Immokalee MPUD N W ; E Z Westc. ox.S V.4, I � Ginger-LN a "-Tlf ° °- �, �kIronwood LN y ° [Eden AVIE G OC Curry�RD c' ° N R 3 T7 Subject Property t d �L 1 VLaWkeTrafl c BushST E P o/� kim mGradyMinor Civil Engineers • Land Surveyors • Planners • Landscape Architects 800 400 0 800 Feet .�,triet School � o allier Cou�'�� Collier County School District School Impact Analysis Application Instructions: Submit one copy of completed application and location map for each new residential project requiring a determination of school impact to the Planning Department of the applicable local government. This application will not be deemed complete until all applicable submittal requirements have been submitted. Please be advised that additional documentation/information may be requested during the review process. For information regarding this application process, please contact the Facilities Management Department at 239-377-0267. Please check [�] type of application request (one only): QSchool Capacity Review ❑ Exemption Letter F-�Concurrency Determination 0 Concurrency Determination Amendment For descriptions of the types of review please see page 3, Project Name: RCMA Immokalee MPUD Project Information: Municipality: Collier County Parcel ID#: (attach separate sheet for multiple parcels): 00071960001 Location/Address of subject property: Lake Trafford Road Closest Major Intersection: Lake Trafford Road and Carson Road II. Ownership/Agent Information: Owner/Contract Purchaser Name(s): Redlands Christian Migrant Association, Inc. Aqent/Contact Person: D. Wayne Arnold, AICP (Attach location map) (Please note that if agent or contact information is completed the District will forward all information to that person) Mailing address: Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A., 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, FL 34134 Telephone#: 239-947-1144 Fax: Email warnold@gradyminor.com I hereby certify the statements and/or information contained in this application with any attachments submitted herewith are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. Owner or Authorized Agent Signature III. Development Information November 18, 2020 Date Project Data (Unit Types defined on page 2 of application) Current Land Use Designation: Agricultural Proposed Land Use Designation: 1—rci.l, Charte School, Residential Current Zoning: A, Agricultural Proposed Zoning: RCMA Immokalee MPUD Project Acreage: Unit Type: SF IMF MH C G Total Units Currently Allowed by Type: 0 Total Units Proposed by Type: 160 Is this a phased project: Yes or No If yes, please complete page 2 of this application. Date/time stamp: N N c� II II �wwx II O N O N O N � N N O N N O N �N�zzz� �I w w x c Types of Reviews: School Impact Analysis: This review should be divided into two categories: - School Capacity Review (land use and rezonings), and; - Concurrency Determinations (site plans and subdivisions). School Capacity Review is the review of a project in the land use and rezoning stage of development. It is a review of the impact of the development on school capacity and is considered long range planning. This may be a review resulting in mitigation being required. In situations where the applicant may be required to mitigate, capacity may be reserved dependent on the type of mitigation. Concurrency Determination is the review of residential site plans and subdivisions to determine whether there is available capacity. When capacity is determined to be available a School Capacity Determination Letter (SCADL) will be issued verifying available capacity to the applicant and the local government. If a project exceeds the adopted level of service standards, the applicant is afforded the option of a negotiation period that may or may not result in an executed/recorded mitigation agreement Mitigation at this stage is expressed as a Proportionate Share Mitigation Agreement. For those residential developments that may have an impact but are otherwise exempt from concurrency, an exemption letter will be prepared for the applicant upon request. For those residential developments that are determined to not have an impact, a letter of no impact will be prepared for the applicant upon request. Exemption Letter: An applicant may request an Exemption Letter as documentation for the local government. These are projects that would be exempt from school concurrency review or projects that do not impact the public schools. Exemptions from school concurrency are limited to existing single family or mobile home lots of record; amendments to previously approved site plans or plats that do not increase the number of dwelling units or change the dwelling unit type; age restricted communities with no permanent residents under the age of 18; or residential site plans or plats or amendments to site plans or plats that generate less than one student; or are authorized as a Development of Regional Impact (Chapter 380, F.S.) as of July 1, 2005. Concurrency Determination Amendment: An applicant may request an amendment to a previously issued School Concurrency Determination or to an application being processed. This review may require additional staff time beyond the initial concurrency determination review and results in a modified determination being issued. An amendment could result in a negotiation period and/or a mitigation agreement being issued or a previously approved determination being modified and reissued. RCMA Immokalee MPUD N W E oism LMA i` • 1111111111111 '® �Ia111111111 • �iif9911111illsii �_ i 1 INNI �` lit- iiili � ��1�- �` > _ .... ..... - - • � 111111 - � 1111�1111�l11ll�e � _,• `- i a IM CD •� " fit' �� ♦> 94 0 . . 0 0 LSGII ISIIPJIY]J' ' 0 0 v^0 J�A�Jp • R! MGradyMinor 800 400 0 800 Feet Civil Engineers • Land Surveyors • Planners • Landscape Architects RCMA Immokalee MPUD (PL20200001827) Deviation Justification 1. Deviation #1 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.03.02 G.1.a., "Supplemental Standards", which requires chain link (including wire mesh) and wood fences are prohibited forward of the primary fagade and shall be a minimum of 100 feet from a public right-of-way. If these types of fences face a public or private street, then they shall be screened with an irrigated hedge planted directly in front of the fence on the street side. Plant material shall be a minimum of 3 gallons in size and planted no more than 3 feet on center at time of installation. This plant material must be maintained at no less than three- quarters of the height of the adjacent fence, to instead allow the use of up to a 6-foot-high chain link fence forward of the primary fagade where the chain link fence is screened with an irrigated hedge planting at a minimum of 3 gallons in size and planted no more than 3 feet on center at time of installation directly in front of the fence facing the external right-of-way. Justification: The proposed chain link fencing is proposed to be used to provide needed security for the school campus component of the MPUD. The deviation is consistent with other fences that have been constructed in Collier County for security. 2. Deviation #2 seeks relief from LDC Section 4.06.02, "Table 2.4 Table of Buffer Requirements by Land Use Classifications", which provides that where multiple family dwellings are adjacent to a community facility (CF) use a 15-foot-wide Type B Buffer is required for both uses, to instead allow for a single 15- foot-wide Type B Buffer to be installed on the residential tract and will be installed at the time of construction of the residential component of the mixed -use PUD. Justification: The project is a unified Mixed Use Planned Unit Development. Although the residential component of the PUD may not be developed by RCMA, it will be developed in a cooperative manner with the intent to have the residential integrated into the school and charter school portion of the PUD. Two 15-foot-wide Type B Buffers is excessive given the cooperative nature of the two uses. Until the residential component is developed no buffer is necessary on the CIF Tract due to the significant distance from the adjacent property to the west which is Lake Trafford Elementary School and its preserve area. July 1, 2021 W GradyMinor Page 1 of 1 RCMALT Deviation Justification-r3.docx Civil Engincers • Land Surveyors • Planners • Landscape Architects Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, FL 34134 • 239-947-1144 • engineering@gradyminor.com • Nvwxv.gradyminor.com ORDINANCE NO. 91- 72 M n AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE 82-2, T COMPREHENSIVE ZONING REGULATIONS FOR T UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDI BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THSP�n HEREIN -DESCRIBED PROPERTIES FROM THEIR CURRENT,, COMMERCIAL OR RESIDENTIAL ZONING s CLASSIFICATION, AS HEREIN -IDENTIFIED ON EXHIBIT "A", TO A SPECIFIC ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF EITHER A-2, RSF-3, RSF-4, RMF-6, RMF-12, MHSD OR C-5 FOR THE INDIVIDUAL PARCELS LISTED HEREIN AS DETERMINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS TO BE .APPROPRIATE AND TO BE CONSISTENT WITH THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN AND: PREVIOUSLY APPLICABLE ZONING OVERLAY DISTRICTS, AS HEREIN -IDENTIFIED, PURSUANT TO OBJECTIVE.II.1 AND RELATED POLICIES AND POLICY II.1.10 OF THE IMMOKALEE AREA MASTER PLAN ELEMENT AND THE IMMOKALEE AREA MASTER PLAN FUTURE LAND USE MAP. OF THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN, AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, Article VIII, Section 1(f)'of the Constitution of. Florida confers on counties broad ordinance -making power when consistent with general or special law; and WHEREAS, Chapter 125.01, Florida Statutes, confers on all Counties in Florida general powers of government, including the ordinance -making power and the power to plan and regulate the use of land and water; and WHEREAS, on January 10, 1989, Collier County adopted the Collier County Growth Management Plan as its Comprehensive Plan pursuant to the requirements Chapter 163,.Part II, Florida Statutes,.also known as the Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act of 1985 and Chapter 9J-5, Florida Administrative Code, also known as the Minimum Criteria for Review of Local Government Comprehensive Plans and Determination of Compliance; and WHEREAS, on February 5, 1991, Collier County amended the Collier County Growth Management Plan and Adopted the Immokalee Area Master Plan Element; and WHEREAS, Objective II.1 of the Immokalee Area Master Plan Element requires all new or revised uses of land to be consistent with designations outlined on the Immokalee Area Future Land Use Map; and 045 27 PAu 9 WHEREAS:,.Policy II.1.10 of the Immokalee Area Master Plan Element of the Collier County Growth Management Plan furthermore provides for the rezoning of inconsistent, unimproved properties to a zoning district consistent with the Immokalee Area Master Plan Element and Immokalee Area Future Land Use Map; and WHEREAS; the zoning amendments herein will bring the zoning district of•the herein described properties into consistency with Objectiv.g_i1.1_and related Policies and Policy II.1.10 of the Immokalee Area Master Plan Element (including the Immokalee Area Future Land Use Map) of the Growth Management Plans and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners directed that the area identified as unrecorded Trafford Farms Subdivision, Lots 1 through 9, be rezoned to a Zoning'District that reflects the existing land use pattern and that is consistent with the Immokalee Area Master Plan Element and Future Land Use Map. NOW; -THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of County Commissioners of collier County, Florida: SECTION ONE: Zoning Amendments from Commercial and Residential Zoning Districts to a Zoning District(s) consistent with the Immokalee Area Master Plan Element and Immokalee Area Future Land Use Map. The zoning classification of the herein described properties is changed from the commercial or residential zoning " district indicated on Exhibit "A" to a specific zoning classification of either A-2, RSF-3, RSF-4, RMF-6, RMF-12, MHSD or C-5 determined by the.Board of County Commissionqxs to be appropriate and to be consistent with the Immokalee Area Master k� Plan Element and Immokalee Area Future Land Use Map of the Growth Management Plan, and previously applicable zoning overlay districts. The Official Zoning Atlas Map Numbers indicated on Exhibit "A", as described in Ordinance 82-2, are hereby amended accordingly: SEE EXHIBIT "A" 0. 045PAS.:279 2 Ir'. ' . 4 u n E 045 WE 280 3 t- •. - ERRIBIT •A• INIOMALEE MASTER ►LAM - �, S ' - RE20M IuyPROCESS .ae...o.e..o.ao....>:..a..>=... ate. AFFECiLD - KETONE TONING F t TO: ATLAS �» . .. FOLIO Ml#BER LErtL DESCRIPTION 007196000/1 STRAP#: 462931-004.005, further described as South 1/2 of Northeast 1/4, C-3 � �A-2 69318 , of Section 31, Township 46, Rarge 29 Less right -of -ay, Less property dcribed in Official Record Book 73j through 67S, Offielalr Record Book 4 esi - 730 through 906, Official Record Book 621 through 1273, Official Record t Book 770 through 196, m recorded to Official Record Boot 970, ►"a 459 4' and 0fff cial Record Book 975, Page 674 of the Public Record of Collier County, florid.. 65.26 acres. .. + 0007980OW/B STRAP#: 462932-110.000, further described as North 290.63 feet of East .C-3 MMSD 6932S - - 135 feet of Hest 330 feet of South 1290.84 feet of East 1/2 of Northeast 114 of Southwest 1/4 of Section 32, Tousship 46. Range 29 as described I. Official Record Book 1399, Page 232 of the Public Record of Collier Canty, Florida. C-3 "SO - 6932S 000798G000/0 STRAP#: 462932-111.000, further described as Worth 290.63 feat of East 13S feet of West 465 feet of South 1290.84 feet of East 1/2 of Northeast. Cm 1/4 of Southwest 1/4 of Section 32, Tovuhlp 46, Raw 29 as described ' in Official Record Book 1399, Page 232 of the Public Record of Collier 1phe County, ftorida. y OD07988000/2 STRAP#: 462932-112.000, further described as ceereenefng at the center of C-3 MNSD 6932S Section 32, Township 46, Range 29, South 190 fee[ to the pelnt of beginning, thence Was 166.33 feet, South 140.45 feet, East 166.33 feet, 00 North 140.G5 feet to the point 1 beginning, less right -of -ay, as - described in Officlet Record Sock 460, Page 170 of the Public Record of , Collier Canty, Florida. - 0012128000/0 STRAP#: 472904-011.000, further described as eoataencing Sourheat e.,w RSF-5 RSF-4 7904M_ Morthu.est 1/4 of Northeast 1/4 of Northwest 1/4 of Section <, To-"Ip 47, Range 29, Hest 30 fast to point of beginning, continuing Westerly 285 feet, Northerly 120 feet, Easterly 29S feet, Southerly 120 fast to point of beginning, as recorded in Officlet Record Book 1<79, Page 1935 of Public Records of Collier Canty, Florida- 0.79 acres. 0012156000/5 STRAP#; 472904.018.000, further scribed as beginning 114 yards Et C-4 RSF-3 7904M plus 221 yards South of the Nortdehwest corner of the Northwest 1/4 onf the Morthwest 1/4 of Section 4, Township 47. Range 29, East 141 yards. hearth 75 yards West 141 yards, Sarah 75 yards to the point of begs mirg, lass West 70.� fast thereof, as recorded in the Official Record Book 65, Pape 507 of the Pubtfc Records of Collier Canty,. Florida. 1.81 acres. D012436000/5 STRAPS/ 472904.072.000, further described as the Souttpheast 1/4 of C-4 YR 79045 ' - leas CEX f/of Southw oa cornet of Northeast 1/4 of - sttion South 343Morth�t"1 d beginningjit Southeast 1/4 of Section <, Township 47, Range 29 East 198 feet, North 634.5 fast, West 198 feet, South 634.5 feet to point of beginning, lass .. - 1 77- ' E01811 -Ae - ' ... ., 1RIIOKALEE NOUN PLAIT " ' REZONING PROSS m..o.ema....>m�....eaas..r...a........a.a.....saCE AFFECTED . _ RE20Yi ZONING • FOLIO INRlER - LEGAL DESCRIPTION FROM: 70t r ATLAS South 30 fast of right-of-way, described In Official Record took 1091, " Page 208 of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida, 12 Act"- " 0012604OW,r9 STRAP/: 472904-087.000, further described as the Southwest 1/4 of RNF-16 RMF-12e 7904S Carolty cap: - CEX App SOAhwast 1/4 of Southeast 1/4,of Section 4, Township 47, it 29 bps M BaVK road right-of-wy described In Official Record Book 1334, ►ages through 954 and Official Record Book 1492, Pages 1384 through 13% of - the Public Records of Cell isr Canty, Florida. 8.82 acres. 6385948000/9 NEW MARKET, Block 31,LOTS 1-4, Anther described In LOfftclot Record Book C-4 RMF-6 69335 1378, Page. 2358 and Official Record took 1521, Page 52 of the Pubtle Records of Coll i or Canty, Florida. 6385952000/8 NEW MARKF7, Black 31,LOTS 5.7, further described In Effie lal Record Book C-4 RMF-6 69333 1527, Page 331 of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida. 638595600010 NEW MARKET, Block 31,LOTS 8-1D, further described in Official Record Book C-4 RMF-6 693.35 I592,-Page 1481 of the Pubt is Records of Collier Canty, Florida. 6385960000/9 NEW MARKET, Block 31,LOTS"11-13. further described in Official Record C-4 RMF-6 603S Book 113, Page 467 of the Public Records of Collier Canty, Florida. " 6185964000/1 NEW MARKET, Black 31,LOTS 14-20, further described In Official Record C-4 RMF-6 6933S " Book 874, Page 46 of the Public Records of Collier Canty, Florida. 6385968000/3 NEW MARKET, Block 31,LOTS 21.24. further described In Official Record C-4 RMF-6 69335 took 1425, Page 1953 of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida. 6385972000/2 NEW MARKET, Block 31,LOTS 25-27, further described in Official Record C-4 RMF-6 6933S aook 1425, Page 1953 of the Public Records of Collier Co M Florida. 6385976000/4 NEW MARKET, Block 31,L07S 28-32 A Southeasterly 10 fast of Lot 33, C-4 AMF-6 69335 further described in Official Record Book 1306, Page 1527 of the hblio Records of Collier Florida. Canty, 6385984DOO/S NEW MARKET, Block 31,LOTS 34.36 6 Northw ttr•ly 10 feet of lot 33, C-4 RMF-6 - 6933S further described in Official Record took 456, Page 837 of the Public Records of Collier Canty, Florida. " 63859880DO/7 NEW KUKET, Block 31,LOTS 37-40, further described in Official Record C-4 ANF-6 6933S took 1597, Page 1420 of the Public Records of Collier CoytY, Florida. - 63860960OD/O NEW MARKET, Block 35,LOTS 1-4, further described in Officiat Record C-4 RMF-6 6933S took •••, Page --- of the Public Records of Collier Canty, Florida. 2 - F 1 sri rt.: • EXNI1IT "A" .- ' IIatOCALEE MASTER PLAN REZONING PROCESS ..........•....a.�......a..+........•m.o.>.. AFFECTED - REZONE RE20NE ZONING FOLIO MLMER LEGAL DESCRIPTION FROIS TOM AT 6386100000/8 NEW MARKET, Block 35,LOTS 5-7 further described in Official Record C-4 tMF-6 6s pe Book 449, Pa433 of the Public933 Records of Collier County, Florida. 638610400010 MEW MARKET, Block 35,LOTS 8.10 further described in Official Record C-4 RMF-6 69335 {ook 148, Page 300 of the Pubble Records of Collier County, (l*ride. 6386f08000/2 NEW MARKET, Block 35, LOTS 11-16, further described in Official Record C-4 RMF-6 69335 Book 115, Page 291 of the Public Records of Colllar Canty, Florida. 6386112000/1 NEW MARKET, Block 35, LOTS 17.20, further described In Official Record C-4 RMF-6 69335 Book ---, Page --- of the Public Records of Collier Canty, Florida. 6386116000/3 NEW MARKET, Rtock 35,LOTS 21-24further described in Official Record 871, 1953 C-4 RMF-6 69333 Book Page of the Public Records of Collier County, Ftorlds. 6386120000/2 NEW MARKET, Block 35,LOt5 25-27, further described In Official Record C-4 RMF-6 69335 O Book 500. Page 754 and Official Record Book 1214, Page 647 of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida. 638612400014 MEW MARKET, Block 35,LOTS 28.33, further described In Official Record C-4 AMf•6 69333 .. Book 1127, Pages 126 1 127 of the Public Records of Collier County, f lorids. a 6386128000/6 MEW MARKET, Block 35,LOTS 34-36 further described In Official Record Book 1127, Page 128 of the Public Records of Collier Canty, Florida. C-4 .10-6 69335 6386132000/5 NEW MARKET, Block 35,LOTS 37-40 further described in Official Record C-4 " RMF-6 69335 - Book 1012, Page 1027 of the Public Records of Collier Canty, Florida. 6386328000/4 MEW MARKET, Black 40,LOTS 1-16 further described in Official Record C-4 RMF-6 69335 Book 118, Page 293 of the Public Records of Collier Canty, Florida. 6386332000/3 NEW MARKET, Block 40,LCTS 17-20, further described in Official Record C-4 RMF-6 69335 CEX App Book 176. Peg* 637 of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida. 6386336D00/5 NEW MARKET, efock 40, LOTS 21.23, further described in Official Record C-4 RMF-6 -69335 - _- CEX App Book w Page •- of the Public Records of Collier Canty, Florida. 6386340000/4 NEW MARKET, Block 40, LOTS 27.34, further described In Official Record C-4 RMF-6 69335 Book 1304, Page 39 of the Public Records of Collier Canty, Florida. 6386344000/6 NEW MARKET, Block 40,LOTS 35.41, further described in Official Record C-4 RMF-6 69335 .. Book 301, Page 700 of the Public Records of [Diller Canty, Florida. 6386740D00/O NEW MARKET, Block 56,LOTS 4.11 further described in Official Record foOk 1593, Page 817 of the PublicIa Records of Collier Canty, Florida. p C-5 790 4 3 .. . F I . ERNIRIT •A' - 110"ALEE MISTER PLAN o....u..ua..:a.::.....:,REZ ONING PROCESS ��:�o...w AFFECTED REZw ZONING OW FOLIO MIRmER IEGAI DESCRIPTION fun.PTO: ATLAS 00061«000/7 STRAP/: 462836-I10.000, further described as Lot 20 in unrecorded A-2NN RSF-3 68361I Trafford Farr Subdivision ibed as the f.11-ing, coss-sing In the Northeast corner of Saco on U Tarahlp <6, pangs 2d Wet 2661.20 tj - feet, South 992.93 feet, Nest 216 feet to point of beyi 4 continuing Nest 203.92 feet, South 330.7E fast, East 95.75 fast, North 45.« feet to point of beginning as recorded in Official Record pooh 1000 Page 473 - through <76 of the PubCounty, Public Records of Collier Coty, Florida. 1.15 acres. 0006148000/9 STRAPa: <62836.110.001, further described as unrecorded Trafford Fara A-71IM RSF-3 6836a Subdi of s for, Lot 1 described es commencing at the Northeast corner of Section 36. Toursh;p i6, Rage 26, Nest 2661.20 feet, South 992.93 feet, West 527.92 feet to point of beginning, cortimirg Pest 138 feet South - 165.34feet, East 11 feet, North 165J7 feet to point of begiming. No ■ recorded In Official Record Root 907, Page 1879 and Official Record Rook 1064, Peg a 983 of the Public Retort$ of Collier County, I,oride. 0.<1 acres. - p DD06152000/8 STRAPR: <62836-110.D02, further described as unrectrded Trafford Fsr Ns Subdivision, Lot 2 A-21g1 RSF-3 6836N F� described as cc�aenclrg at Northsast corner of Sect tan 36, TouroA�p <6. Range 28, West 2661.20 feet, South 992.93 tset, West <19.92 feet to point of bey inning, cmt inning West 108 fee[ South 165.3T feet, East 103 test, North 165.39 feet to point of beginning, as recorded in Official Record gook 1430, Page 2289 of the Public Records - of Collier Canty. Florida. .41 acres. 00 DD06156000/0 STRAPp: <62836-110.003, further described as unrecorded Trafford Farms A-bm RSF-3 60M 1� Subdivision, lot }, described as coamerucing at Northeast corner of Section 36, Tuwneh ip L6, Range 28, Wes[ 2661.20 feet, South 992.93 fast, Wes[ 108 tee[ to point of bepimirq, continuing West 10d feet, Swth - 165.« feet, East IDS feet, North 165.47 feet, as reeerded In Official Record Book 1D66, Page 1033 of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida. 0006160000/9 STRAPa: <62836.110.00<, further described as unrecorded Trafford Fanaa A -BIN RSF-3 6836N Subdivi sign, lot A, described as eoamerucfnq at Northeast corner of Sect inn 34 Taneuhip <6, Range 28, West 2661.20 feet;.south992.93 fast, to point of beslmirg, West 108 feet South 165.47 feet, Eat 108 }set, North 165.49 fast to point of beginning described in Official Record gook low, Pegs 1685 of the Public Records of Collier Canty, Florida. 0006164000/1 STRAP#: 4628336.110.005, further described as unrecorded Trafford Ism A-bNi RSF.3 60" Subdivision, Lot 9, described as commencing at Northeast 1/4 comer of Section 36 Township 46 Range 28 West 2661.20 feet, south i15D.<2 feet, West 527.83 feet to point of b"Innirg, 138 feet -Sarah continuing West 165.34 fast, East 138 feet, North 165.37 test to point of besimfrg, as A .. . ,:.e,...,... - I EXHIBIT 'Ae .. .. IINYJXALEE MAf7ER ►LAN r T:-.._` `h r ' `-", . • .• ' REZONING PROCESf ': •'- '•., ^... T' _ .. . AFFECI�•; •.;.. . EAIInAll .. FOLIO NLMER - LEGAL DESCRIPTION described in Official Record Book N O, ►age 1422 ItOfficial Record Book " 1040, Page 204 of the Public Records of Collier Canty, Florida. - 0.41 - 0006168000/3 STRAP#: 4626M-110.006, further described as unrecorded Trafford Farr A-bal RV-3 60M .. Subdivision, Lot 8 described as commencing at Northeast corner of Section M, Township 46, Range 28, West 2661.20 feet, South 1151SAZ feet, Nest 419.75 feet -to point of beginning cattinuinng Yost IDS fast South 165.37 feet, East 108 feet, North 165.39 feet to paint og begiming, ee recorded in Official Record Book 1068. Page 1695 of the Public Records of ' Collier Canty, Florida. 0.41 Kres. DD061720DO/Z STRAP#: 4628M-110.007, further described as "worded Trefford Farr A-2NN RSF-3 6836R ® Sdivision, Lot 7, described m as commencing at Northeast 1/4 corner of ub Section M Township 46, Range 28, West 2661.20 feet, South 1158.42 feet, West 216 fast to point of beginning, continuing West toil fast South - 165.42 feet, 108 feet, North 165.K - - Q East feet to point of beginning, to Official Record Book 1495, Page 89 Records !� recorded of the Public of Collier Canty, Florida. 0.41 Kree - 0006176000/4 STRAP#: 462E36-110.008, further described as unrworded Trafford Farr A-21111 RSF-3 68i6M _ Subdivision, Lot 6 described as me coencing at Northeast corner of - - section M, T..n hip 46, Range 28 West 2661.20 feet, South 1158.42 feet, WEst 108 fret, to of beginning, West 108 feet South 165.47 feet, point ast 108 feet, North 165.49 feet to point of beginning, as recorded in _ Official Record Book 1001, Pegs % of life P16lic.Records of Collier .. - County, Florida. 0.41 Krts. .. .. 0006180000/3 STRAP#: 462636.110.009, further described as unrecorded Trafford Farr A-29a RSF-3 68MN ... Subdivision, Lot 5 described as co.esenc ing at Northeast corner of Section 36, Township 46, INga Z8,-West 2661.20 feet, South 1158.42 feet, to point of beginning, West 108 feet South 165.47 fast, East 108 fast, ' North 165.49 feet to point of beginning, as recorded in Official "tic Record Book 785, Page 720 of the Public RKordt of Collier County, . Florida. IEOEND A-2: Rural Agriculture RNF-16: Multi -icily R-Idmtfal ASF-3: Single Family Residential - NNR►t Nobl to Rome Rental Park .. RSF 4. Single Family Residential Subdivision NNSD: Nobila Name Subdivision RSF-5: Single F-1 Resident lal C-4: Corrcial "—II ANF6t Nul ti-Ff It DugleA, Single Family Residential C-5: Ccamerclal InAmtrlal RNF-12: Multi -Family Rasldmtial - 5 .. 0 a. "-'-STATE OF FLORIDA ''COUNTY"OF COLLIER , ,S 1, JAMES C. GIL;Clerk of Courts In and for the entieth Judicial Circuit, Collier County, Florida, do hereby certify that the foregoing Is a true copy of: ifs Ordinance No. 91-72 ,.which was adopted by the Board of county Commissioners on 12th day of August, 1991, during Special Session. WITNESS my hand and the official seal of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this 15th dayofAugust, 1991. JAMES C. GILES Clerk of Courts and Clerk Ex -of f Ic1d to Board- of County Commissioners Y: /s/Maureen K yon Deputy Clerk 0 045PACIF286 O0 C VA Westclox St M U L RCMA Immokalee MPUD Public Facilities Lake Trafford Rd Subject Property Legend <all other values> n 9 Neighborhood Park Aquatic Park Beach Park Boat Park 7Z`: ,. Community Park Fitness Center Little League Fields Preserve Park r Regional Park School Park ]Skate and BMX Parks State Park Schools Fire Station 0 Office 0 Maintenance 0 Public Safety Office Q EMSMedical 0 Office 0 Police Substation County Jail City Jail Lee�� Q o ,Ov 3�c.y0 Q� Immokalee Dr �-�t; WP Z �2 O�Imyor flee ��^�FP a 3 Roberts Ave W Comm r{ Parh fQ � F Immokalee Boston Ave © vv� elk 'a in c o :S y m� E E 11� o� 0 r: tup de Rd E f N W r E S Immoka Regior Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, USGS, Intermap, INCREMENT P, NRCan, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri Korea, Esri (Thailand), NGCC, (c) OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community wGradyMinor 3,000 1,500 0 3,000 Feet Civil Engineers • Land Surveyors • Planners • Landscape Architects AFFIDAVIT OF COMPLIANCE Petition Pi_20200001827 RCMA Immokalee MPUD Rezone I hereby certify that pursuant to Ordinance 2004-41, of the Collier County Land Development Code, I did cause the attached newspaper advertisement to appear and I did give notice by mail to the following property owners and/or condominium and civic associations whose members may be affected by the proposed land use changes of an application request for a rezoning, PUD amendment, or conditional use, at least 15 days prior to the scheduled Neighborhood Information Meeting. For the purposes of this requirement, the names and addresses of property owners shall be deemed those appearing on the latest tax rolls of Collier County and any other persons or entities who have made a formal request of the county to be notified. The said notice contained the laymen's description of the site property of proposed change and the date, time, and place of a Neighborhood Information Meeting. Per the attached letters, property owner's list, and copy of newspaper advertisement which are hereby made a part of this Affidavit of Compliance. Sharon Umpenhour as Senior Planning Technician for Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. State of Florida County of Lee The foregoing Affidavit of compliance was acknowledged before me this March 12, 2021 by Sharon Umpenhour as Senior Planning Technician, who is personally known to me. (Signature of otary Public) :;n`• ?v CABIN J. DWYER *. *. MY COMMISSION I GG 982367 Carin J. Dwyer EXPIRES: MaY 14,2024 .`y,..... P_ Printed Name of Notary GradyMinor Civil Engineers • Land Surveyors • Planners e Landscape Architects NOTICE OF NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING Petition PL20200001827, RCMA Immokalee MPUD Rezone (PUDZ) A Neighborhood Information Meeting hosted by D. Wayne Arnold, AICP, of Q. Grady Minor and Associates, P.A., representing Redlands Christian Migrant Association, Inc. (Applicant) will be held on March 30, 2021, 6:00 pm at the Immokalee Charter School, 123 N. 4th Street, Immokalee, FL 34142. Individuals who would like to participate remotely or have questions or comments should contact Sharon Umpenhour, Senior Planning Technician with Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. by email: sumpenhour@gradyminor.com, phone: 239-947-1144, or mail: 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, FL 34134. Project information is posted online at www.gradyminor.com/planning. Redlands Christian Migrant Association, Inc. submitted a formal application to Collier County, seeking approval of a Mixed Use Planned Unit Development (MPUD) Rezone. The MPUD rezone proposes to rezone the property from the Agricultural (A) Zoning District with a Wellfield Risk Management Special Treatment Overlay Zone W-1 through W-4 (ST/W-1 thru ST/W-4) to the RCMA Immokalee MPUD Zoning District to allow a 700 student K-8 Charter School, a 250-student pre-school, 160 multi -family dwelling units, which may include market rate, essential service and/or affordable housing units, and 5,000 square feet of Intermediate Commercial (C-3) uses and associated accessory uses. Access to the educational campus and housing will be from Lake Trafford Road, with a separate access to Carson Road to serve the small commercially designated tract. The subject property is comprised of 62.2± acres, located on the northwest corner of Lake Trafford Road and Carson Road Section 31, Township 46 South, Range 29 East, Collier County, Florida. C Westclox ST �u1 a Max 1)R—_~Q H •� m LN Rironwood d Lancewood LN s SUBJECT � a d PROPERTY [justice _ G CIR Curry RD L t� a U Project Location Map r = m � A Lake (Trafford RD Bush ST W v 7� Trafford Isles CIR The Neighborhood Information Meeting is for informational purposes only, it is not a public hearing. Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. Ph. 239-947-1144 Fax. 239-947-0375 3800 Via Del Rey 1,1110005151 1,110005151 K 26000266 Bonita Springs, FL 34134 wa7xv.gradyminor.com �nry'_APPreIaa/a-I. P,= PL20200001827 Buftl: 1000' 111.1�11N ANE TFI;l _OOO AS 0 AEI.El IIIS 0= AGEVEM, lTOIIOMAU­ IAIIA AC ULE, C-F­ IW HISON, GERINITINE J '9 00073360007 ALINGO ]EEoUAS=`LOS S.30OO- ­ = JASIINE 1111141 1 IIELIESPERANIA ­DAV..E. A.FC -'CA'E I' RV, INC :7 0 INOHIE, PABIUEE D 1111 IE: JEAN W.IER 131: AN'O:NE I GEE 363 224 AIRl=l FIELILERVE AT4­ .4.00l II Aaao . 1 77 22430' IIIW"EA' 22: LL.0 742AL:l 300� Aaao..EAD . LL ;742 224 Al 22: L I. 30'= III LL.0 ;742 300 7.3 Aa O..EAD 742 224 01 11 AIIIW"EA 22: LL.0 742 I., Aaao..EAD . LL 1. 3 ;742 WO�2 224 IIIW"EA 22: LL.0 742 1. 30' = A ;742 300� AaaO..EAD II LL 224 A EA 22: LL.0 42 III= A'aG.W" ' LL 1.300 a HEAD ;7 742 110100= AaAGWW"EAD LANE�IL-ENTI OF SUI 1.300 HE U. 3Z 224301= AIIW"EA' 'E RVE AT .4310 Aa OWN :E EAD RE ERVE A 224 47 A'aGWW"EAG RE RVE AT a HEAD ERVE AT 224 A EA E:ERIE A "OW" T .-0-44 ARROW.EAD RE ERVE AT 224 A EA E:ERIE A .4-1 a HEAD ERV A'a0oWW" 'RE E AT 224111= AIOW"EA E:ERIE I AT I.I. Aa OW.EAD RE ERVE COMMERCIAL 224301= AIIOyWo E�IUIESERVE AT GGGGO ARRO L MENDOZA UEAAGUIRMENDOZA SM6490MM45 ASTREIDE, JEAN I TAL & MARIE 355 7 12 A NIEL 224300-1 AU.IUCTE EM' MICH'EL , ­ _8 556,00W266 AVE=EDA. JOSE S IS= I. IO=l' ='=. LEOS Foo A.T�YR-ENT-A '­GTA'.`FOAD 1 DS­ MADISON 5 IIANANIII LIBERTY EYIN 00 J G I ITO - JUEU­GTC0NS ICE TRAFFORD 2ALIC ED RG A GO 0 ED AL:'O ED AL DO ED A CORD AL:G ORD A GORD AL:C 0. A L:'O ED AL DO ED I =TMORD 11T '. T�:F 11T '. T�:F I T '1 T�:F TRAFF011 TRAPF.- I L'ERW'AY MARI R=US= :001. 21 pc") CO.. 212= IT 11 V4AY 1' MILM A-VARADO EIC��G I I I I VVAY la 10A, FLORIDA ULC ST 11. P ORD 11. 0" IIA::NC FORD P. 0" IIA::NC FORD P. 10A, TRACT 'CC FGA IN I . ereJore, 1 SM IAITINII W I 1 UNIT 8 INC ''NO C NO NO NO INC UM MM.A AS.M. .1 . P..M.l li. aau y as.1.111an CCRA p­ids Lllltlll: 0007196000(Proposed RCMA I . . I kAl...MPUD) .ANA... 3719 JUSTICI GIR 1313 232 CAR1,00'N' I IT 7.2 AUCO ED 321 VY MAIN ST 214120 AILI 77 1� OWE 11 STE 742 AL:CO ;742 A 02 742 AL:CO ;742 A 02 ;742 AL:10 COZ 7742 AZIO ED 51507 AMI TRL N 313 7.2 AUCO RD E 27GS EDEN AVE 3728 JUSTICE CIA - lllllllllllllr� MGALT SI 1,2­0 =='SE'RV'E'A'T'��E TRAFFO D PHASE ONE M A LOT 12 ""OKAME, FL 111�1'2- 1 'EA.D.FESEFVE, AT -E TRAFFORD PHASE ONE BLK A LOT 71 SI I =VV ""I �'1112 Z. =..ND-"'B -Lo�WAT -F TRAFFOR. PHASE A LOT IS NAPLES, FL S4142-0 11 46 19 IN 125FT OF N112 OF SEIM OF NEIM OF NEIM LESS I 1651T :""O.IL:E 1 1 42- =Al EFIEIVE.T -F TFAFF'011 I I INE, 0, 'NW'l 'A OFT R 717 FL 3. TO, DEW, 2 OF u� 4 OF 4'0 -114 0 PC 1 _71 IAl 10­ 3413­ 31 4B 29 SIR AT NW 11101 ME 11 OF SEC 31, 1 SM)IT, A M ET TO FOR, I 'l.FT' I.I. N I 7TlTOP.R IMMONAME, FL - - U142 �. UPIELRE' LANSANT'JLUOT 44TION MMOIOULEE, FL M 42 1 1 CION III -A A CONIOMINUI ILIG 53 UNIT 8 'MMOI 34142-31S LIBERTYI-AIDINGUITIS OFT MYCE FL 33S". AIFEI RE:ERVE AT E T FORD I I ONE T_ ER:� IL 331 EaVE AT = E T �: FORD P = E_O CT-001 I 1.1ER TL 33, ER:� IL 331 AaaOl"EAD RE EaVE AT =E LIT2 FT !I-- AAa-ao.'"EA. FE:ERVE AT T FORD I 1 ;0 LOTI 1.1ER TL 33, l- AAAC..EAY FE:ERVE AT T FOR 1 0 ER I E E E =F RD E;. D LL'OTT 'M' !I-- ARE IV AT=E 0 P=E I IER:: 'L 331 Aaa.01"EAD RE L 33, .FAY FE:ERVE AT T 'RD P=E L AaaOl"EAD RE EIVE AT =E ED 1 0 OT17 FTMI 331 - E =FO E;. .D LIT. 1.1ER TL 33, AAAG..EA. FE:ERVE AT T I'D P=E Aa ERVE AT =E TO 1 0 'D LL'OTT ' MIER:, IL 331 !1-- AAA.01"EAD FRE E =FO E I.YER TL 33, .EAG E T FOR. 0 1 FT MYERS FL III— AaaO..EAD IS :ERVEE A�TT =EE =FORD PP=EE ;0 D LL'OTT 1 D2 MMO= L S' 421- FAIL C.EANDRESEU 'ATO NIP" ­U 'L 12 UNIT I MMONAL E: 'FL 4�4 - A CEN RVE IS =D E ONE TR�,%GT G_LESS THAT PART NIKA -HOMES I AT TR­ ISM NAILES­ 1110-P AFFOWlEAD IE:ERIE AT E T�:FOF. PrE T FO Aaao'"EAD R EaVE AT =E T FORD ASE IT M": FL 333:12 A. FE:ERVE A =E ED I TRACT OM FIAT MYERS FL 3 2- AFA.W.E T T 'RD 'rE ONE TlpilT F - ARRO HEAD RE EaVE AT E =FO ASE 0 FIAT M" L `2 1 .1 ME T T, F.RTMYER FL . 2- ARE W. EA. I T I E:ERVE AT Fo0'RD 'rE ONE T' 'PI A EaV =E FIAT M" AaaOl"E D RE E AT E T�:F E ONE TPIT I E:ERVE AT Fo0'RD P=E ONE TI CTRI FIAT MYER:: FL .2-1 AAACVU.EA. I T I EaV =E E AT E T�:F E TPIT F. FIAT M":: FL .2 FIAT MYER 2-1 AARaO'W"EAD FRESERVE AT LANE TRAFFOR. PHASE -0 TRAET - AILES F ARRO FIAT M , F V , . G­ SERVE=" TRAT' F.PHAZEONE TRACT 0 " �E­ '14 'L`N� ARE W"EAD FREEERVE TRACFTO' -1 MONAME, FL "14' L:,IERT.Y D:N LOT14 :M _=l' MO.LEE 'L 31 2- L EF LAND NO LOT UNETRO T I MMGM.LEE IL 34 A"RE VNEALGAOE TRAFFORD PHASE ONE ..ALOTIS E: F U!4422= RE" EE 42= MMGM.LEE: 'FLL U14 LTEENWMNA`NN0`F= TRACT 3 IESC AR: C01M NVY III SEC 32 E 30FT OF S 540FT TO PON, S 95,19F-I E 100FT N 95FI 34 3 IMMONAME, FL U143= AAA02WH.EEA.DARTElEERVERAoT _E T III GFENOI GAL MO.LEE 'L SI 43 3 1 R I. Iff OF = I W 495FT TOOTP'O'B, W 1485FT N E 1485FT S WFT TO :.00.O'= ULC ALS 11 I__ I j A 'ENT ­S 17:1 =%=L7 I ' I. I, I � &I FRENTA ENT ALB 11 '7:� 1. .7 I `PTlJ4ENRT.A.`F.ER 36W­TlCE_G TE '.ARRRR'N CCOLLLL:ER 5SU90= GAZILE CIDOUANE & EDRINE III 000722 FAM 'FILL ­E I DONALD 55GW­ BELI 55.90DRA ELL%RE, 3661' 3 1130­1 BWCNER IRI%.F TENNESSEE IND 313 69060­ CLOCIER AM 130, 11" 11 1=11A. ULIANA 378C7,JNUAMCELCIR 2 1 DA .'C-EL'NE 5BU900MI BUSTAMANTE. JOSE N GOMEZ HERMINIAGOMEZ 100;3= Cl A C PRI OF:IMOKALEE 01IN01.17 AGE FEET OF MMONAL ED 10073= 1 ALC FFION70R.�EIDOO Rl�OKALEE .430 CA IS AL .4:_121 I_I�TII I I- CUMAY 3760JUSTICECIR I MAR RE: UT.RAYMOND C.ROGETTE 5SM90021M CA-NE I � 3 611111= C1110S ARMONDIM 3S48LBER­ 2243000 CANA:: FLEURETTE PC 6619113206 CANTAV 'NANELY 3-JU 2243001 AMI CARIENAS, LETICIA RAULCNIVEZ 5GGGoW7U CAR 'LUS MINOUCIAE 311 55.90-1 GARRUL 3 1130010101 CASSEUS..'GELIVI=CE I- 000730= CCASTANEDA,JES SO OFELIA "300 AST RD (03802SAPPI CEPVAN4E=E '=NCDAEMTRION 11"91-7 CHARLENIRI. DES INS CHRISTIANE 22430O_2' CHARLE 113000INS9 CHARLK _BUN'lE JEAN �20: 14 ==T" CCHARLK =R`&'R_0SEIUNE 3:3ml 111 11211 CHAVII. RE l� RMA _:_4IO CH ERIGUS FRAN OIS JOCELINE 111111IMPS CHE - AFIE I.-OSTS6 CHEVEERY, JEAN 1 1138 1215WONSIO COLAR, ­ CLAUDE . 1130003202 COLLIER INTY STA TE TATEROADIN STA.1 TA JUSTICE �UET IS T:C " MATRIET R::E. I I 0 7'USTCEC'R '0'91 I U " tFT:CE ADAMS I IlMAS ILI IT U:H H ST 'FUs'ENCEH2PCWLAY I -FA CHERILUS ERCIA BUSH ST DE =SPOR= I N OADIS I N I OAD IS N I IS N CIA I:R RD W NSWAY.1 T CALIIRE CIA E I:R I A IT CASTANEGA CHARLENORD I E CLERVIL CHERY CASSENS E 1 RIG- 1703 1 2TI AVE W PC '0' 3S31 JUSTICE CIA III BUSH ST E 3631 JUSTICE CIA 1213 AGAMS IT PC RON w 11 ElUS"lT F 17GO 0 3588LIBER­ 3717 lUFT:CE I ST G:R A S;9�5�tUSTICECIR 3 11. 1885 = DRIVE S MMONAME: 'FLL �U14422= M.0.1:LEE MMANOR LLIT I " 4 MO.LEE ANCE GTE EE FLL 42= MO.I:L AN- L 4:0 MMOML U14 LE M LIT I OR I ". 14 A MOKAUEE: , 34 2 NO I MANCE T'O 13 1 30: MMONALEE, FL 141�4= MIOGR' EMAN UILI 11. 11 EE 2 LRE M MMOOIL 'L . LAN G IT A E:, FL 1.7 31 4�6 22: ACI)�Ml NNIE4,CNR, DEC W S.1 S VISIFT N S7 E3E��'W 4 7 2.;.!T .2.1.- ELY 2..R- ALI BE . I N- 'L LEI RAI LESS OR ­ 75L A. IMMONAME. FILL IMI'4�120316 LIJI�ERTY INDING - 1. B"GENT." 3 INNOO Nl' IF SEIN 01 NEIM 01 NEI LESS E 1 .1 MMONALM. FL 34142-315 LIBERTY I-ANDING UOTW "M'MO.'ME: FL 34�42_= =W`N_EAD`RNEIESRVE`AT LANE TRAFFORD PHASE ONE A LOT 1 "MOIAUEE 1�42_ 1EELRI ATJL`GT`TON A CONIOMINUM BLDG 51 UNIT I MMONALEE: 'FLL U 42- LIE NDI NO 13 w 3 1 L I LOT "MOKAL:E 1�4 17 1 MMOM E: 'FLL U 42-231. L::ERW LAND NO LOT 2 NE'1'1400FNEjl'14­ 1301 O= =3= OFNEIM EBB S 1 SOFT AS AD OR 12N ED 1679 "MMONAL E: 'FLL U I � 46 1 14FOF BE OM'L:E 3 'EREVEAT OF W10FIRMOF NEIN, LESS -01 "MMO E: 'FLL U 432::S7' AA'R02. IT I LANE TRAFFORD PHASE ONENEII OF _ A LOT 3 E 42f D:N OM'L:E 'L U= .1� L::EW" 'LT' "MMO :F 2_ 1 L ERTY LAND NO LOT I. - I I D:N :"MOMIL:E =2 L::EW - MMO E: 'FLL U _= L RTY IND NG LL'OTT S' MOMIL:E 1�42_ W.LANDERSELEVEAT TRAT' FDP-E.NE .-ALOT75 MMO E: 'FLL U 42-0 =TY ING OT 4. MOKAL:E: FL U1�42f -LANDERIELEVE.T TRAFFORD PHASE ONE ..AL-Il MMONAL SSJE =TY ING OT - "MMOM'l-2: FL U=2 =7 =WW EAG`RNEIESRVEA`T LANE TRAFFORD PHASE ONE A LOT OFNEIMOF NEIM. UES:. 2301 23 MO'L =3- 3 '.W I ' 2ATF 0 W DOE IRS ONE A LOT IS "MMOI 'FLL U 42- AA'R02W EADE= �.E ZISFFOR PHAS :"MOMIL:E 1�43_ .. R I M'N LGLTO'T 1. MMO E: 'FLL U 42-0 USE TY , IDTNG E 42 ,1 ARR W EA El T 0 ED ALOT:' "MMONAL :F If ARR'OWH ERV =E O= 'L U= HEAD 'RE SERVE AT FORD I E ONE A E AT E T�:F D I R r ME "MOKAL:E 1�42_ LIFEIIWILANDINGUITTE MMOM E: 'FLL U 42-0 JU LATIN LOT 30 I D:N MOMIL:E =2 L: : E I WW 'I " D N '. LL'OTT MMO E: 'FLL U :MMOMIL:E 1�42_ IN GVEA' Mo E: 'FLL U 42-0 =W'HEADDESSER T LANE TRAFFORD lH.E ONE A LOT 23 1 " I FL M I LAT L I NMAMPOL E BLF LE' 3 4 11 ARROWHEAD RESERVE AT LANE TZ;FOR. lH.E ONE TRACT R-I '."E ­.' N "EUL" " "'MITE B" Mll_­FBEACN, CA 9 16­ ARROWHEAD RESERVE AT LANE 69060­ CUE A' LET CIA N N AT LA N aE�.� o 'L 99 11.1BEREN000 BE N LNFL ua MEELIS 11 CA L 1111 REFLECTION LANE UNIT 7 MMI 'FLL NE `BONS ETITION No I" LANE EAD RESERVE AT E AMER- EBID =S 33 —so No No LE ONE ON E OF FL "�42_Z REFLECTIONS GARCI2,431111 AMpREAR—IILLA NEZCOSTILLA 3803 JUSTICE CIRCLEMIND E:l FL U W BE GARCIA' RCN MIND E:l D 3811 JUSTICE LE NAPL 332W05 RANDY FOOD STORES NC % IRANDY 175 EO 0O. DUN No t808 RLE TAMMEA. FL 000]33601-1808 314829 COMM Et/. CNRNI POualtCtO_P1202t00018n.xla PL LE HOME o :M 15. HE -SS NEAR AND. 3- — ST WEST RESERVE AT =E Eea oNooM�Ma o�,3 N,3go toaR LAND Eo Eas I'%=RY=A EME ,. N „aoZs,sR.b.SE'.W NO=CTL1 o.z 5-00-P LOU MARE LU RK SEA PLO ARE FULI,�L P OUG7,., ���,�,� Po,a,,.�, NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING Petition PL20200001827, RCMA Immokalee MPUD Rezone (PUDZ) A Neighborhood Information Meeting hosted by D. Wayne Arnold, AICP, of Q. Grady Minor and Associates, P.A., representing Redlands Christian Migrant Association, Inc. (Applicant) will be held on March 30, 2021, 6:00 pm at the Immokalee Charter School, 123 N. 4th Street, Immokalee, FL 34142. Individuals who would like to participate remotely or have questions or comments should contact Sharon Umpenhour, Senior Planning Technician with Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. by email: sumpenhour@gradyminor.com, phone: 239- 947-1144, or mail: 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, FL 34134. Project information is posted online at www.gradyminor.com/planning. Redlands Christian Migrant Association, Inc. submitted a formal application to Collier County, seeking approval of a Mixed Use Planned Unit Development (MPUD) Rezone. The MPUD rezone proposes to rezone the property from the Agricultural (A) Zoning District with a Wellfield Risk Management Special Treatment Overlay Zone W-1 through W-4 (ST/W-1 thru ST/W-4) to the RCMA Immokalee MPUD Zoning District to allow a 700 student K-8 Charter School, a 250-student pre-school, 160 multi -family dwelling units, which may include market rate, essential service and/or affordable housing units, and 5,000 square feet of Intermediate Commercial (C-3) uses and associated accessory uses. Access to the educational campus and housing will be from Lake Trafford Road, with a separate access to Carson Road to serve the small commercially designated tract. The subject property is comprised of 62.2± acres, located on the northwest corner of Lake Trafford Road and Carson Road Section 31, Township 46 South, Range 29 East, Collier County, Florida. � W1stclax ST m ra Ironwood LN 34 0 al�. L�7�V.4Od LN suur��k � a PRDPERTY —C ,luarlcfi G IR Curry RG r i1 y� I } 4 �aFs IlTrafw�r a. 7R[D) b Bush ST W a-. Traffar� I�CIR The Neighborhood Information Meeting is for informational purposes, it is not a public hearing. ND-GCI0606570-01 NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING Petition PL20200001827, RCMA Immokalee MPUD Rezone (PUDZ) March 30, 2021 PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY be COVES of*** The information on this sheet is to contact you regarding this project and future public meetings. Under Florida law, e-mail addresses, phone numbers and certain home addresses are public records once received by a government agency. If you do not want your e-mail address, phone number or home address released if the county receives a public records request, you can refrain from including such information on this sheet. You have the option of checking with the county staff on your own to obtain updates on the project as well as checking the county Web site for additional information. NAME: LCLLt . � � EMAIL: ADDRESS: - IM Sinn �CA1IIc�- �OLh j\ PHONE: NAME: G ' f '� EMAIL: ADDRESS: iS l-50.1 Ale PHONE: r / 3 e� NAME: 4 /�% EMAIL: (�f11�,� / 7 Cl'k) ADDRESS: / /_ PHONE: NAME: EMAIL: ADDRESS: PHONE: NAME: EMAIL: ADDRESS: PHONE: NAME: EMAIL: ADDRESS: PHONE: NAME: EMAIL: ADDRESS: PHONE: NAME: EMAIL: ADDRESS: PHONE: NIM Sign -in Sheet 03-30-2021 First Name Last Name Email Registration Time Approval Status Address Charlie Martin cmartin@bbchi.com 3/16/2021 7:56 approved 927 US Hwy 301 South Oscar Bigelow obigelow@bbchi.com 3/17/20219:12 approved Handy Food Stores, 927 US Hwy 301 South Tampa, FI 33619 Petition PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee Mixed Use Planned Unit Development (MPUD) March 30, 2021 Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM) © GradyMinor Project Team • Redlands Christian Migrant Association, Inc. - Applicant • D. Wayne Arnold, AICP, Professional Planner - Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. • Michael Delate, P.E., Civil Engineer - Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. • James M. Banks, P.E., Traffic Engineer - Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA • Marco A. Espinar, Biologist - Collier Environmental Consultants, Inc. 2 Location Map 3 - Project Information Current Zoning: Agricultural (A) with a Wellfield Risk Management Special Treatment Overlay Zone W-1 through W-4 (ST/W-1 thru ST/ W-4) Proposed Zoning: RCMA Immokalee Mixed Use Planned Unit Development (MPUD) Existing Future Land Use: High Residential Subdistrict and Commerce Center -Mixed Use Subdistrict (Immokalee Area Master Plan) Project Acreage: 62.2+/- acres 4 Proposed Request • Rezone from the Agricultural (A) Zoning District with a Wellfield Risk Management Special Treatment Overlay Zone W-1 through W-4 (ST/W-1 thru ST/W-4) to a Mixed Use Planned Unit Development (MPUD) to allow a maximum of 700 student K-8 Charter School, a 250- student pre-school, 160 multi -family dwelling units, which may include market rate, essential service and/or affordable housing units, and 5,000 square feet of Intermediate Commercial (C-3) uses and associated accessory uses. 5 N Proposed MPUD Permitted Uses Community Facility Tract: 1. ildcare centers (8351) 2. mmunity centers 3. Parks and playgrounds, indoor/outdoor recreation facilities, open space uses 4. Schools, private and parochial schools (821 1) Residential Tract: 1. Dwelling Units: Multi -Family 2. del homes / model sales or leasing offices Mo Commercial Tract: 1. All permitted and conditional uses in the C-1 through C-3 Zoning Districts of the Collier County Land Development Code (LDC), Ordinance 04-41, as amended. 6 . Proposed Master Plan s m c� m m ZONED: VR lye' USE: UNDEVELOPED m I p_Np mZ c) s T) 5'WI,DE TYPE 9' O LANDSCAPE BUFFER R yc T MINIMUM 6FOOT WIDE S IANDSCAPE BUFF ER RESERVATION pyQ (SEE NOTE•2) o a g (n R my c RRESERYE� m BUFFER ZONED: ARROWHEAD MPUD USE: PARTIALLY DEVELOPED RESIDENTIAL ZONED: VR ONED: VR USE: UNDEVELOPED SE: RESIDENT ,svnDE TvaE aJ ZONED: 1. LM1DSfAPE 2D W,DE TYPE �. USE: RESIDE BUFFER LANDSCAPE BUFFER CF" /N\ SITE SUMMARY TOTAL SITE AREA: 62.22±ACRE COMMERCIAL(C) 0.44±AC(1%) RESIDENTIAL(R) 11.65± AC (19%) COMMUNITY FACILITY (CF) 42.33±AC (68%) PRESERVE 7.8± AC (12%) RESIDENTIAL: MAXIMUM 160 DWELLING UNITS COMMERCIAL: MAXIMUM 5,000 S.F. Imo— OPEN SPACE: ZONED:A REQUIRED:30% ,s vAOETwE USE: EM IRE PROVIOED:30% a ST, BUFFER ION #31 PRESERVE: REQUIRED: 5.15 ACRES (20.6±ACRES NATIVE VEGETATION X 0.25) PROVIDED: 7.8 ACRES 2B WIDE TYPE D LANDSCAPE ' ZONED: G BUFFER USE: C NIENCE — I_ M STO SBECIALEyENTACCE55 — ZONED: ARROWHEAD MPUD USE: UNDEVELOPED COMMERCIAL TRACT Proposed Development Standards PRINCIPAL STRUCTURES'S MULT4 FAMILY AMENITY AREA-3 COMMERCIAL COMMUNITY FACILITY Minimum Floor Area per unit 700 SF N/A N/A N/A Minimum Lot Area N/A N/A N/A N/A Minimum Lot Width N/A N/A 60 feet N/A Minimum Lot Depth N/A N/A N/A N/A Minimum Setbacks (External) Lake Trafford ROW N/A 250feet N/A 100 feet Eastern PUD Boundary N/A N/A 25 feet 100 feet Western PUD Boundary 50 feet 15 feet N/A N/A Northern PUD Boundary*1 50 feet 50 feet 0/5feet 200 feet Minimum Setbacks (Internal) Internal Drives/ROW 10 feet 5feet N/A 5feet Lakes (measured from control elevation) 20 feet 20 feet 20 feet 20 feet Preserve 25 feet 2S feet 25 feet 25 feet Minimum Distance Between Buildings 20 feet N/A N/A 20 feet Maximum Building Height Zoned Actual 45 feet 55 feet 25feet 35 feet 3S feet 45 feet 35 feet 45 feet ACCESSORY STRUCTURES'4,'S MULTI- FAMILY AMENITY AREA t3 COMMERCIAL COMMUNITY FACILITY Minimum Setbacks (External) Lake Trafford ROW 2SO feet 250feet N/A 50 feet Eastern PUD Boundary N/A N/A 15 feet SO feet Western PUD Boundary 10 feet 15 feet N/A N/A Northern PUD Boundary*1 25 feet 25 feet 0/5feet 50 feet Minimum Setbacks (Internal) Internal Drives/ROW 0fen 0fees N/A 0feet Side Yard N/A N/A N/A N/A Rear Yard N/A N/A N/A N/A Lakes (measured from control elevm Tan 0 feet 0 feet 0 feet 0 feet Preserve 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet Minimum Setbacks (External) 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet Minimum Distance Between Buildings'6 0/10 feet N/A N/A N/A Maximum Building Height Zoned Actual 25 feet 30 feet 25 feet 30 feet 30 feet 35 feet 30 feet 1 35 feet SPS—Same as Principal Structure BH— Building Height (zoned height) '1-0 feet if commercial tract developed as SDP for adjacent C-3 commercial. '2 — Front yards shall be measured from back of curb (if curbed) or edge of pavement (if not curbed) for private streets or drives, and from ROW line for any public roadway. '3— When not located in a residential building within the "R" tract. '4—Does not apply to passive recreational uses such as trails/pathways. 'S - Community structures such as guardhouses, gatehouses, fences, walls, columns, decorative architectural features, streetscape, passive parks and access control structures shall have no required setback, except as listed below, and are permitted throughout the "R" designated areas of the PUD; however such structures shall be located such that they do not cause vehicular stacking into the road right-of-way or create site distance issues for motorists and pedestrians. '6 —Zero feet if attached, 10 feet if detached. Note: nothing in this MPUD Document shall be deemed to approve a deviation from the LDC unless it is expressly stated in a list of deviations. 8 - Proposed Deviations from the LDC DEVIATION 1: Relief from LDC Subsection 5.03.02.G.1.a., Supplemental Standards, which requires chain link (including wire mesh) and wood fences are prohibited forward of the primary facade and shall be a minimum of 100 feet from a public right-of- way. If these types of fences face a public or private street, then they shall be screened with an irrigated hedge planted directly in front of the fence on the street side. Plant material shall be a minimum of 3 gallons in size and planted no more than 3 feet on center at time of installation. This plant material must be maintained at no less than three-quarters of the height of the adjacent fence, to instead allow the use of up to a 6-foot-high chain link fence forward of the primary fagade where the chain link fence is screened with an irrigated hedge planting directly in front of the fence facing the external right-of-way. DEVIATION 2: Relief from LDC Subsection 5.03.02.D.1., Fences and Walls, Excluding Sound Walls, which requires fences or walls shall be limited to a maximum height of 8 feet, to instead allow a maximum height of 15 feet with vegetative screening along Lake Trafford Road adjacent to the soccer/outdoor recreation area. 6 Conclusion Documents and information can be found online: Gradyminor.com/Plann/*ng Collier County GMD Public Portal: cvportal.colliergov.net/cityviewweb Next Steps Hearing sign(s) posted on property advertising Planning Commission (CCPC) and Board of County Commissioner (BCC) hearing dates. CCPC - TBD BCC - TBD Contact: • Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A.: Sharon Umpenhour, Senior Planning Technician; sumpenhour@gradyminor.com or 239.947.1 144 extension 1249 • Collier County: Timothy Finn, AICP, Principal Planner, Timothy.Finn@colliercountyf/.gov or 239.252.4312 io N Transcript March 30, 2021 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ (PL20200001827) NIM Wayne Arnold: Good evening, everybody. My name is Wayne Arnold, and I'm a professional planner with Q. Grady Minor and Associates. We're representing RCMA, and those of you who are on Zoom — it looks like there are three of you — and making sure that you can hear me fine, speaking this — okay, thanks for the nod. Appreciate that. So, I'm Wayne Arnold. I'm going to introduce a few people. We're required to create an audio and a transcript of this meeting for Collier County. So, Sharon Umpenhour, from Grady Minor, will be recording the meeting. We have a biologist in the room that's working on the project, Marco Espinar. We have Mike Delate, a professional engineer from our office. We have Jim Banks, a professional traffic engineer, and Laura De John representing Collier County government, and we have Mike Facundo, RCMA, and several representatives of RCMA in the room, in case there are any specific questions that we can't field. So, we're here tonight for a required neighborhood information meeting. The county requires we hold these after we receive our first round of review comments for zoning cases. So, we've sent out public notice for that, and we're conducting the meeting tonight. Our next step in the process will be continuing through the review process with county government, and we'll ultimately be scheduled for a planning commission meeting, as well as a public hearing before the Board of county commission for final approval sometime in the future. There are no dates yet established. So, the location exhibit, we have on the screen is the 62-acre property. It's currently undeveloped. As you can see, it's a former ag field. It is adjacent to... sorry, it showed on my computer screen but not your screen. So, the former farm field, there are a couple of areas of native vegetation onsite. One in the southwest corner is likely to be retained as part of our native vegetation requirement. And we have a small parcel, a finger that goes out to Carson Road, which is north of the Handy store, and we're designating that as a commercial tract on our master plan with no internal access to the community that we're proposing. So, the current zoning on the site is agriculture. There are some wellfield protection zone overlays that are on the site. They're not prohibitive; they are just restrictions on the land development code to talk about how we store and contain certain materials, but I don't think there are any of those associated with what we're proposing to do here. Page 1 of 9 Transcript March 30, 2021 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ (PL20200001827) NIM From a future land -use standpoint, the high residential sub -district as well as the commerce center mixed use for the commercial tract. And again, we're a little over 62 acres in size. So, we're proposing to rezone the property to allow a mixed -use plan development, and we're proposing to allow a 700-student K through 8 charter school. We're proposing to allow a 250-student preschool. We have a residential tract to accommodate up to 160 multi -family units, and then, the small parcel that we have that's designated commercial — is about 0.44 acres, and we're asking for C-3 type commercial uses not to exceed 5,000 total square feet on that property. So, the proposed uses that we're seeking, we've broken this up into a community facility tract which would allow for the childcare, the private school, community centers, parks and playgrounds with recreational amenities. And then, we have the residential tract, and then, on the commercial, as I mentioned, we're asking for all permitted uses in the CI through C3 commercial district. I don't think RCMA has any immediate plans to develop the commercial tract, but it's part of the assemblage that they're acquiring, so we're including that as a small commercial tract. This is our proposed master plan. You can see that we have access points proposed on Lake Trafford Road. A couple locations, we've identified, but the most central one is a potential event parking. There's an opportunity, potentially, for the school to partner with Collier County, and there could potentially be a soccer field or something that could be co -used between the public and RCMA. So, we made potential access for that. We're not accessing Curry Street, and the only access over to Carson is for the small commercial tract. Our residential tract is in the northwest corner of the site. And then, you can see our preservation tract. This plan is very conceptual. The school's working with their architect to try to refine this a little further, trying to identify some of the internal circulation. I know that county staff has asked about that, so we're gonna try to better define that. So, if you're on this call and receive notice, you can follow along with our proposed changes as they occur through the review process, either on the Grady Minor planning website, or you can contact Collier County government and Laura De John, or one of the other people can certainly get you the latest information. Or certainly, you can email Sharon Umpenhour in our office, and we'll be happy to get you all of that information. So, we also, as part of this process, we're developing development Page 2of9 Transcript March 30, 2021 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ (PL20200001827) NIM standards for the property, so we have separate development standards for the multi -family building, for our amenity areas, for the commercial tract, and then, as well as the community facility that have the preschool and the K through 8 charter school on. I'm not going to go through all of those development standards, but this is a requirement as part of our zoning change. So, this is just sort of — we're asking for a couple of deviations here. One, we want the ability to put chain -link fence forward of a principal structure. It's not clear whether or not the charter school would be permitted the exception that's granted for other schools for chain -link, so we're asking for that deviation, and we're asking for that to be up to 15 feet in height, in case we do have play fields that are across from Lake Trafford Road contain errant soccer balls and play balls. So, those are the two deviations from the code that we're asking for today. There could be others that come about as they continue to review from staff, but those are the only two that we've identified to date. And in conclusion, we again, we can see all this information through the public portals. We will have a planning commission date. We will have a board of county commissioner date. Those dates have yet to be established. When they are, there will be mailed notices sent out to surrounding property -owners from Collier County government. There will be signs posted on the property, with the hearing dates. And then, Sharon's contact information is at the bottom of the screen, as is Tim Finn. He's our planner. Laura De John is filling in for him tonight, but Tim Finn is with Collier County. He's assigned to our case. So, with that, I'm going to turn it over to questions from the public, or those of you who are on the Zoom. So, we want to take people in the audience, if anybody has questions. Yes, sir. Can you state your name? Max Griffi: Who's the housing going to be for? This gonna be migrants, or would it be for anybody, or...? Wayne: The question was, who's the housing going to be for? And I don't think that they have any contractual obligations with anybody yet. They've spoken to a developer that has other units in Immokalee. We've set this up so that it's not just for an affordable housing project. We've advertised that it can be for market -rate or for essential service personnel, because we just don't know at this point Page 3of9 Transcript March 30, 2021 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ (PL20200001827) NIM what form it will take. I wish I had more information, but we just really don't at this point. The focus has been on trying to get RCMA relocated to their campus. Max: Will it be based on income? Wayne: The question is, will rent be based on income? And I don't know. Market rate would just be whatever the market dictates. The county, if we become affordable housing units, then they would be subject to certain income parameters that the county establishes, but we're not asking for an affordable housing density bonus. The density we've asked for is achievable under the current comprehensive plan density guidelines. Any other questions? Ma'am, I know you're with the public. Do you have any questions? Maria Sierra: I do. I live across the street, in Arrowhead, and my main concern is because Lake Traffic is just that two-lane. What is going to be the projection for that road to be widened? And I know that you're gonna have an exit on Carson Road extension, which the only other way out would be down to Westclox which takes you to 29, which runs into New Market. And there is no light there. There is gonna be — traffic is horrendous already. I want you to just picture this, because our roads are so narrow already, and not wide enough to support that much traffic in that area. What is the projection of the roads in that area? Wayne: So, we have a question from one of the members in the audience in attendance who lives across the street in Arrowhead, and she's questioning traffic patterns and whether or not there's access to a light, et cetera. So, I'm gonna let Jim Banks, our traffic engineer, come up and answer that question, so that those of you on Zoom can hear the response as well. Jim Banks: Hello, Jim Banks. The roads that you just mentioned, Lake Trafford Road, Carson Road, New Market, those are all county -maintained roads. So, they determine when those roads need to be widened. Currently, there is nothing on their five-year capital improvement program plan to widen Lake Trafford or Carson Road, or put a signal at Carson and New Market. Wayne: So, you've done the analysis — Max: You mean Westclox and New Market? Page 4 of 9 Transcript March 30, 2021 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ (PL20200001827) NIM Jim: Yes. Maria: Then, because honestly, there aren't any turning lanes, really off of that road, off of Carson. Carson, how it runs on [inaudible], there are no turning lanes. [inaudible] taking a lot of traffic, because on the Guadalupe Center is actually building another preschool [inaudible], so I'm just thinking, how is there not any plans to widen that road, or even add turning lanes? Because within a year or so, when that is done, that's gonna be a large amount of traffic going through there, and then you add this. This is going to be — wouldn't this be projected to be done? Jim: Is what being projected — Maria: This whole project here, because I'm just calculating the traffic that's gonna be going into that particular section, and — Jim: Oh, okay. Well, let me address your traffic question, and I'll let Wayne talk about the timing. Again, those intersections and those roads that you brought up are under the jurisdiction of Collier County Department of Transportation. We don't work for Collier County DOT. They monitor those intersections, and the roadways that [inaudible]. Your comment's on public record, so I'll be happy to pass that information on to Collier County for their consideration, but they're the ones that review those items and determine when those improvements would be made. Wayne: Can you just also address level of service, Jim, just speak a little louder Jim: Yes. Okay. So, currently, Lake Traffic Road is operating a level of service C, which is C as in Charlie, which is considered an acceptable level of service on Collier County standards. And it is projected to continue to be operating level service C to the year 2025 with this project being built. And Carson Road is actually at level of service B, as in boy, which is even a higher standard than what Lake Trafford operates on. Wayne: Thank you, Jim. So, those of you on Zoom, do any of you have any questions for us that we can answer? If you do, would you unmute yourself and go ahead and ask? Okay, I'm going to continue. One question that wasn't answered — and Mike, maybe you can correct me if I'm wrong — but the timeframe for the school, we're obviously in the process to obtain the zoning entitlements. We're at some point going to start the hard engineering and Page 5of9 Transcript March 30, 2021 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ (PL20200001827) NIM permitting process. I think the idea is for the school to at least get started sometime in probably early 2022 at this point, since we're already in 2021. So, I don't know what the build out — I don't know, Mike, if you want to try to talk about any of the phasing schedule, if you even know that. Mike Facundo: Well, there's no phasing schedule. Wayne: Why don't you come up and have you on the... Mike Facundo: One of the things I think that we have, that would be good — all right, thank you, Wayne. Can you guys hear me? All right. Okay, cool. So, I know two things. I hear your frustration, and the concern, I could say, because that's exactly correct. And as I said on the local advisory CRA board, one of the things that we keep pushing is the traffic light right at New Market — and what is that? Westclox extension? — and 29. And what I was told is they're starting doing another study, and it's going to happen, which is going to help alleviate some of Lake Trafford traffic, so I hope that helps. But as part of the concept of this is that traffic as you said, and the roads are not failing, actually, it meets the requirements for the development. But as far as the phasing piece of it, the first phase is just going to be the childcare. So, what's gonna happen here is two existing facilities on this site that are going to go away. And they're gonna be — we're not adding kids, but we're going to replace the buildings that are here, because we know there is a parking situation off of this site path, so that's gonna help alleviate the problem we have here, by creating that over there. But the other two has not really been determined for what the build out will be. But it allows for the opportunity, if they RCMA for some reason — I don't know. I'm just thinking out loud, perhaps, instead — look, we want to really remove this piece and maybe sell it, or if partner with someone that would be able to do, then give them options. Because the truth is, guys, 62 acres is a big piece of property, and so, it was kinda one of those neat challenges, to say, what do we do? So, nothings been etched in stone, we felt, with the Grady Minor and the planners, and meeting the program, that this would be a great opportunity to meet the need that's out there. We're not into competing with anyone in the sense of creating certain housing for certain individuals, but an opportunity to be able to create some sort of market rate as Wayne just talked about, to be Page 6 of 9 Transcript March 30, 2021 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ (PL20200001827) NIM able to — it is a big need. One of the things I know that schools and nurseries struggles with, is how do we bring the teacher from the outside to want to live in Immokalee? Because there's not a lot of housing here for that kind of income bracket. So, the options is here, and so, we're hoping that perhaps going through this process where we would have come up with a lot of different solutions. So, thanks. Wayne: Thanks, Mike. Anybody else have any other questions or comments? Max: Maybe do you know where the bypass is to come in? Wayne: We have another comment related to the State Road 29 bypass? Max: Supposed to be a bypass to Immokalee. Maybe all the traffic for Immokalee right now, [inaudible]will take that, and they're going to Miami and so and so forth. And that'll take some of the pressure off, Westclox because that's like [inaudible] — Maria: Yeah, so, where's the new road gonna be? Max: [Inaudible]. Maria: [inaudible] — Wayne: Sir, if I might. The people out here that are on Zoom aren't going to pick you up. So, either you come up and use the microphone, or I'll try to repeat. The question was whether or not the State Road 29 bypass, when it's built, will it take some of the traffic off, the pressure off some of the local streets. And I don't know the answer to that question. Jim, you may know more. I really don't. Jim: The state's still studying it. Wayne: Yeah, the state is still studying that issue. Max: [inaudible]? Jim: Yeah, I mean, it's still in the PDE [inaudible]. It's not [inaudible]. Wayne So, the comment from Jim Banks was that it's still in the planning, design, and engineering phase, and it's not a funded improvement by the state. Max: All right, put the stop light up there then. Page 7 of 9 Transcript March 30, 2021 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ (PL20200001827) NIM Wayne: All right. Well, thanks for your comment. So, if those of you on Zoom don't have any further comments, and there's no other questions in the room, I'm gonna go ahead — Female Speaker: [Inaudible]. Wayne: Okay, sure, go right ahead. Martin - Zoom: The only commercial area is the area just immediately to the north of the Handy food store on the corner. Is that correct? Wayne: That is correct. Martin: So, the small parcel there. Wayne: Yes, it's a tiny little 0.4 acre parcel, but it just made sense. It's in the commercial designation, and we've asked for C3 zoning, which is the same zoning on the properties north and south of us. Martin: All right. One other question is the area immediately to the west of us. Has the Natural Resources Department looked at that? Because it is wet there. Wayne: There are. I think the better quality is at the western piece that we show as on preserve. I think the RCMA folks have an opportunity there to potentially make some interactive trails and do some other outdoor recreation. I don't think there's any building improvement plan for that southeast corner near the commercial tract. Martin: Okay. Well, thank you very much. Wayne: Sure. Thank you all for participating. Any other comments or questions? If not, we're gonna adjourn the meeting. Female Speaker 2: Can you share what the gentleman asked? Wayne: Oh, I'm sorry. The folks in the audience didn't hear the question. The question was, the area just immediately west of our commercial tract, he mentioned that there appear to be wetlands there. And I know Marco Espinar, our biologist, has been out on the site and created the vegetative mapping. There are potentially some wetlands in that area. I don't think that the intent is for RCMA to put physical buildings in that southeast corner. I think that preliminarily, we're looking at that to be open -space, recreational uses for the campus. Page 8 of 9 Transcript March 30, 2021 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ (PL20200001827) NIM All right. Thanks. Anything else, everybody? If not, thanks everybody for taking the time to join us tonight. We're adjourned. [End of Audio] Duration: 20 minutes Page 9 of 9 (CHAPTER 8, COLLIER COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE FOR LAND DEVELOPMENT) A zoning sign(s) must be posted by the petitioner or the petitioner's agent on the parcel for a minimum of fifteen (15) calendar days in advance of the first public hearing and said sign(s) must be maintained by the petitioner or the petitioner's agent through the Board of County Commissioners Hearing. Below are general guidelines for signs, however these guidelines should not be construed to supersede any requirement of the LDC. For specific sign requirements, please refer to the Administrative Code, Chapter 8 E. 1. The sign(s) must be erected in full view of the public, not more than five (5) feet from the nearest street right-of-way or easement. 2. The sign(s) must be securely affixed by nails, staples, or other means to a wood frame or to a wood panel and then fastened securely to a post, or other structure. The sign may not be affixed to a tree or other foliage. 3. The petitioner or the petitioner's agent must maintain the sign(s) in place, and readable condition until the requested action has been heard and a final decision rendered, If the sign(s) is destroyed, lost, or rendered unreadable, the petitioner or the petitioner's agent must replace the sign(s) NOTE: AFTER THE SIGN HAS BEEN POSTED, THIS AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE SHOULD BE RETURNED NO LATER THAN TEN (10) WORKING DAYS BEFORE THE FIRST HEARING DATE TO THE ASSIGNED PLANNER. AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER BEFORE THE UNDERSIGNED AUTHORITY, PERSONALLY SAYS THAT HE/SHE HAS POSTED PROPER NOTICE AS COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE ON THE PL20200001827, RCMA Immvkalee MPUD. STtNATURE OF APPLICANT OR AGENT Sharon Umpenhour as Senior Planning Technician for Q. _Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. NAME (TYPED OR PRINTED) STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF Lee APPEARED SHARON UMPENHOUR WHO ON OATH REQUIRED BY SECTION 10.03.00 OF THE COLLIER PARCEL COVERED IN PETITION NUMBER(S) 3800 Via Del Rey STREET OR P.O. BOX Bonita Springs, Florida 34110 CITY, STATE ZIP The foregoing instrument was sworn to and subscribed before me this 18 day of August , 2021, by Sharon Umpenhour as Senior Planning Technician for O. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A., personally known to me er�o- primed :ae^+ircatien and who &Vdid not take an oath. =DWYERXplJ. Signature of Not PubliMY C2367a;d XPICarin J. Dwyer Bondedrwriters Printed Name of Notary Public My Commission Expires: (Stamp with serial number) Rev. 3/4/2015 (CHAPTER 8, COLLIER COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE FOR LAND DEVELOPMENT) A zoning sign(s) must be posted by the petitioner or the petitioner's agent on the parcel for a minimum of fifteen (15) calendar days in advance of the first public hearing and said sign(s) must be maintained by the petitioner or the petitioner's agent through the Board of County Commissioners Hearing. Below are general guidelines for signs, however these guidelines should not be construed to supersede any requirement of the LDC. For specific sign requirements, please refer to the Administrative Code, Chapter 8 E. 1. The sign(s) must be erected in full view of the public, not more than five (5) feet from the nearest street right-of-way or easement. 2. The sign(s) must be securely affixed by nails, staples, or other means to a wood frame or to a wood panel and then fastened securely to a post, or other structure. The sign may not be affixed to a tree or other foliage. 3. The petitioner or the petitioner's agent must maintain the sign(s) in place, and readable condition until the requested action has been heard and a final decision rendered, If the sign(s) is destroyed, lost, or rendered unreadable, the petitioner or the petitioner's agent must replace the sign(s) NOTE: AFTER THE SIGN HAS BEEN POSTED, THIS AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE SHOULD BE RETURNED NO LATER THAN TEN (10) WORKING DAYS BEFORE THE FIRST HEARING DATE TO THE ASSIGNED PLANNER. AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER BEFORE THE UNDERSIGNED AUTHORITY, PERSONALLY SAYS THAT HE/SHE HAS POSTED PROPER NOTICE AS COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE ON THE PL20200001827, RCMA Immvkalee MPUD. STtNATURE OF APPLICANT OR AGENT Sharon Umpenhour as Senior Planning Technician for Q. _Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. NAME (TYPED OR PRINTED) STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF Lee APPEARED SHARON UMPENHOUR WHO ON OATH REQUIRED BY SECTION 10.03.00 OF THE COLLIER PARCEL COVERED IN PETITION NUMBER(S) 3800 Via Del Rey STREET OR P.O. BOX Bonita Springs, Florida 34110 CITY, STATE ZIP The foregoing instrument was sworn to and subscribed before me this 18 day of August , 2021, by Sharon Umpenhour as Senior Planning Technician for O. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A., personally known to me er�o- primed :ae^+ircatien and who &Vdid not take an oath. =DWYERXplJ. Signature of Not PubliMY C2367a;d XPICarin J. Dwyer Bondedrwriters Printed Name of Notary Public My Commission Expires: (Stamp with serial number) Rev. 3/4/2015 R MBMMCnLHff EARINGcuNOTIICE 0%11 6f 46LUPMIN1 12DWP9911 PELI119N NO PL09,000DIM CGpi:: SEP1EMMf I IG. 7081 U NG h. nl. NCG: DrTGU?l ?S. lb21 U:Qp n m. UWIE PIRO DOVEANNRNr M0. LY6. Lk 7RVI R 71IS17 Ih1 Fl41R. ""' !Hr 747 4 4