Loading...
Agenda 10/26/2021 Item #17C (Ordinance - The Shoppes at Santa Barbara PUD)17.0 10/26/2021 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This item requires that ex parte disclosure be provided by Commission members. Should a hearing be held on this item, all participants are required to be sworn in. Recommendation to approve an Ordinance of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida amending Ordinance No. 89-62, as amended, The Shoppes at Santa Barbara Planned Unit Development by adding dwelling units as a permitted use; by amending Ordinance Number 2004-41, as amended, the Collier County Land Development Code, which established the comprehensive zoning regulations for the unincorporated area of Collier County, Florida, by amending the appropriate zoning atlas map or maps by changing the zoning classification of the herein described real property from a Commercial Planned Unit Development (CPUD) Zoning District to a Mixed -Use Planned Unit Development (MPUD) Zoning District for the project to be known as The Shoppes at Santa Barbara MPUD, by allowing up to, with a mix to be determined by maximum allowable traffic generation, 150,000 square feet of commercial uses and 242 dwelling units in addition to the previously approved commercial uses; by adding deviations, by revising development standards and amending the master plan. The property is located at the northeast quadrant of Santa Barbara and Davis Boulevards, in Section 4, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, consisting of 18.1f acres; and by providing an effective date. (PL20200002233) (Companion to item 16A1) OBJECTIVE: To have the Board of County Commissioners (Board) review staff's findings and recommendations along with the recommendations of the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) regarding the above referenced petition and render a decision regarding this PUD Amendment (PUDA) petition; and ensure the project is in harmony with all the applicable codes and regulations in order to ensure that the community's interests are maintained. CONSIDERATIONS: The property is 18.1f acres and is located at the northeast corner of the intersection Santa Barbara Boulevard and Davis Boulevard (SR 84). The Shoppes at Santa Barbara PUD was originally approved by Ordinance 89-62, allowing for 150,000 square feet of commercial uses proposed in the form of a commercial strip shopping center on an 18.1+/- acre site. The PUD is in Activity Center #6, which is designated through the Future Land Use Element of the Growth Management Plan for mixed use development and concentration of commercial intensity and residential density up to 16 dwelling units per acre. A one -acre site has been developed at the corner of Davis Boulevard and Santa Barbara Boulevard with a 7-Eleven convenience store with fuel pumps. This facility is proposed to remain as a Commercial [C] designated tract, and the remaining 15.1+/- acres of the developable area of the MPUD is proposed to be designated for Mixed Use [MU] development. The petitioner requests that the Board approve uses on the 15.1+/- Mixed Use Tract to accommodate a maximum of 150,000 square feet of commercial uses, a maximum of 242 multi -family uses, or any combination of principal uses not to exceed the trip cap established in Section 5.3.H of the PUD document, which is 550 two-way PM peak hour net trips. No change is proposed to the maximum height of 60 feet established in the original PUD approval. Final Plat application FP-PL20210001774 has been submitted by the applicant to split the Mixed Use Tract with a new 2.4-acre lot along Santa Barbara Boulevard and a new 1.1-acre lot fronting Davis Boulevard, resulting in a 11.5-acre lot for the proposed multifamily project. Site Development Plan application SDP-PL20210001398 has been submitted by the applicant to develop this resulting lot with 242 multifamily dwellings. FISCAL IMPACT: The rezoning by and of itself will have no fiscal impact on Collier County. There is no guarantee that the project, at build -out, will maximize its authorized level of development. However, Packet Pg. 1846 17.0 10/26/2021 if the PUD Rezone is approved, a portion of the land could be developed, and the new development will result in an impact on Collier County public facilities. The County collects impact fees prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy to help offset the impacts of each new development on public facilities. These impact fees are used to fund projects identified in the Capital Improvement Element of the Growth Management Plan as needed to maintain the adopted Level of Service (LOS) for public facilities. Additionally, in order to meet the requirements of concurrency management, the developer of every local development order approved by Collier County is required to pay a portion of the estimated Transportation Impact Fees associated with the project in accordance with Chapter 74 of the Collier County Code of Laws and Ordinances. Other fees collected prior to issuance of a building permit include building permit review fees. Finally, additional revenue is generated by application of ad valorem tax rates and that revenue is directly related to the value of the improvements. Please note that impact fees and taxes collected were not included in the criteria used by staff and the Planning Commission to analyze this petition. GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: Comprehensive Planning staff identifies that the subject property is designated within the is designated Urban, Urban Mixed Use District and Urban Residential Subdistrict and is within Mixed Use Activity Center #6. Mixed Use Activity Centers are intended to be mixed -use in character. Urban designated areas allow for both residential and non-residential uses. The proposed uses are consistent with the Future Land Use Element of the Growth Management Plan (GMP). Transportation staff found that the subject petition request can be found consistent with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the GMP because there are no additional traffic impacts resulting from the proposed changes. The GMP is the prevailing document to support land use decisions, such as this proposed rezoning. Staff is required to make a recommendation regarding a finding of consistency or inconsistency with the overall GMP as part of the recommendation for approval, approval with conditions, or denial of any rezoning petition. This petition is consistent with the GMP. COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION (CCPQ RECOMMENDATION: The CCPC heard Petition PUDA-PL20200002233, The Shoppes at Santa Barbara PUDA on September 2, 2021, and voted unanimously to forward this petition to the Board with a recommendation of approval with the two conditions recommended by staff and an additional revision to the development standards to restrict maximum actual height for all residential buildings of 45 feet except three easternmost residential buildings along the eastern boundary shall have maximum actual height of 60 feet. The CCPC recommendation was unanimous, and the only public comment about the petition was comment on the allowable height of 60 feet that is already allowable through the existing PUD. As such, this petition is on the Summary Agenda. LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: This is a site -specific amendment to a Planned Unit Development Zoning District and a rezone from a Commercial Planned Unit Development to a Mixed Use Planned Unit Development for a project which will be known as The Shoppes at Santa Barbara MPUD. The burden falls upon the applicant to prove that the proposed rezone is consistent with all the criteria set forth below. The burden then shifts to the Board of County Commissioners, should it consider denying the rezone, to determine that such denial would not be arbitrary, discriminatory or unreasonable. This would be accomplished by finding that the proposal does not meet one or more of the listed criteria below. Criteria for PUD Amendments Ask yourself the following questions. The answers assist you in making a determination for approval or not. Packet Pg. 1847 17.0 10/26/2021 1. Consider: The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer, water, and other utilities. 2. Is there an adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of agreements, contract, or other instruments or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense? Findings and recommendations of this type shall be made only after consultation with the County Attorney. 3. Consider: Conformity of the proposed MPUD with the goals, objectives and policies of the Growth Management Plan. 4. Consider: The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening requirements. 5. Is there an adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the development? 6. Consider: The timing or sequence of development (as proposed) for the purpose of assuring the adequacy of available improvements and facilities, both public and private. 7. Consider: The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion. 8. Consider: Conformity with MPUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the particular case, based on determination that such modifications are justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations. 9. Will the proposed change be consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies and future land use map and the elements of the Growth Management Plan? 10. Will the proposed MPUD Rezone be appropriate considering the existing land use pattern? 11. Would the requested MPUD Rezone result in the possible creation of an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts? 12. Consider: Whether existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the property proposed for change. 13. Consider: Whether changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed amendment necessary. Packet Pg. 1848 17.0 10/26/2021 14. Will the proposed change adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood? 15. Will the proposed change create or excessively increase traffic congestion or create types of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses, because of peak volumes or projected types of vehicular traffic, including activity during construction phases of the development, or otherwise affect public safety? 16. Will the proposed change create a drainage problem? 17. Will the proposed change seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas? 18. Will the proposed change adversely affect property values in the adjacent area? 19. Will the proposed change be a deterrent to the improvement or development of adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations? 20. Consider: Whether the proposed change will constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual owner as contrasted with the public welfare. 21. Are there substantial reasons why the property cannot ("reasonably") be used in accordance with existing zoning? (a "core" question...) 22. Is the change suggested out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the county? 23. Consider: Whether it is impossible to find other adequate sites in the county for the proposed use in districts already permitting such use. 24. Consider: The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site alteration which would be required to make the property usable for any of the range of potential uses under the proposed zoning classification. 25. Consider: The impact of development resulting from the proposed MPUD rezone on the availability of adequate public facilities and services consistent with the levels of service adopted in the Collier County Growth Management Plan and as defined and implemented through the Collier County Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance [Code ch.106, art.II], as amended. 26. Are there other factors, standards, or criteria relating to the MPUD rezone request that the Board of County Commissioners shall deem important in the protection of the public health, safety, and welfare? The Board must base its decision upon the competent, substantial evidence presented by the written materials supplied to it, including but not limited to the Staff Report, Executive Summary, maps, studies, letters from interested persons and the oral testimony presented at the BCC hearing as these items relate to these criteria. The proposed Ordinance was prepared by the County Attorney's Office. This item has been approved as to form and legality, and requires an affirmative vote of four for Board approval. (HFAC) Packet Pg. 1849 17.0 10/26/2021 RECOMMENDATION: Staff concurs with the recommendation of the CCPC and recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approves Petition PUDA-PL20200002233, The Shoppes at Santa Barbara MPUD. Prepared by: Ray Bellows, Zoning Manager ATTACHMENT(S) 1.08-16-21 - Staff Report - Shoppes at Santa Barbara PUDA (PDF) 2. Att A - Ordinance - 090821 (PDF) 3. [Linked] Att B - PL20200002233 Applicants CCPC Backup (PDF) 4. Att C - CCPC-BCC Hybrid Meeting Waiver (PL20200002233) (PDF) 5. Affidavit Sign Posting Updated 9-20-2021 (PDF) 6. legal ad - agenda ID 20019 (PDF) Packet Pg. 1850 10/26/2021 17.0 COLLIER COUNTY Board of County Commissioners Item Number: 17.0 Doc ID: 20019 Item Summary: This item requires that ex parte disclosure be provided by Commission members. Should a hearing be held on this item, all participants are required to be sworn in. Recommendation to approve an Ordinance of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida amending Ordinance No. 89-62, as amended, The Shoppes at Santa Barbara Planned Unit Development by adding dwelling units as a permitted use; by amending Ordinance Number 2004-41, as amended, the Collier County Land Development Code, which established the comprehensive zoning regulations for the unincorporated area of Collier County, Florida, by amending the appropriate zoning atlas map or maps by changing the zoning classification of the herein described real property from a Commercial Planned Unit Development (CPUD) Zoning District to a Mixed -Use Planned Unit Development (MPUD) Zoning District for the project to be known as The Shoppes at Santa Barbara MPUD, by allowing up to, with a mix to be determined by maximum allowable traffic generation, 150,000 square feet of commercial uses and 242 dwelling units in addition to the previously approved commercial uses; by adding deviations, by revising development standards and amending the master plan. The property is located at the northeast quadrant of Santa Barbara and Davis Boulevards, in Section 4, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, consisting of 18.1f acres; and by providing an effective date. [PL20200002233] (Companion to item 16A1) Meeting Date: 10/26/2021 Prepared by: Title: — Zoning Name: Laura DeJohn 09/09/2021 1:18 PM Submitted by: Title: — Zoning Name: Mike Bosi 09/09/2021 1:18 PM Approved By: Review: Zoning Zoning Growth Management Department Growth Management Department Growth Management Department County Attorney's Office Office of Management and Budget County Attorney's Office Ray Bellows Additional Reviewer Mike Bosi Zoning Director Review Diane Lynch Growth Management Department Trinity Scott Transportation James C French Growth Management Heidi Ashton-Cicko Level 2 Attorney of Record Review Debra Windsor Level 3 OMB Gatekeeper Review Jeffrey A. Klatzkow Level 3 County Attorney's Office Review Completed 09/09/2021 2:01 PM Completed 09/09/2021 3:03 PM Completed 09/09/2021 5:21 PM Skipped 09/09/2021 5:24 PM Completed 09/11/2021 10:10 PM Completed 10/13/2021 3:29 PM Completed 10/13/2021 3:37 PM Completed 10/13/2021 4:40 PM Packet Pg. 1851 Office of Management and Budget County Manager's Office Board of County Commissioners Laura Zautcke Additional Reviewer Geoffrey Willig Level 4 County Manager Review Geoffrey Willig Meeting Pending 17.0 10/26/2021 Completed 10/14/2021 9:54 AM Completed 10/14/2021 10:58 AM 10/26/2021 9:00 AM Packet Pg. 1852 17.C.a Coi ier County STAFF REPORT TO: COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: ZONING DIVISION — ZONING SERVICES SECTION GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT HEARING DATE: September 2, 2021 SUBJECT: PUDA-PL20200002233 THE SHOPPES AT SANTA BARBARA MPUD Owner: Strohl Family, LLC 328 Bow Line Bend Naples, FL 34112 REQUESTED ACTION: Contract Purchaser/ Applicant: Altman Development Company, LLC 1515 S. Federal Highway, Suite 300 Boca Raton, FL 33432 Agent: D. Wayne Arnold AICP Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey Bonita Springs, FL 34134 The petitioner requests that the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) consider an application to amend Ordinance Number 89-62, as amended, The Shoppes at Santa Barbara Planned Unit Development (PUD). The request is to rezone from CPUD to MPUD and add up to 242 dwelling units as a permitted use; and to allow a mix of use, to be determined by maximum allowable traffic generation, of up to 150,000 square feet of retail commercial uses and 242 dwelling units; and to allow deviations from internal amenity parking standards, buffer standards, and side slope standards for drainage facilities. GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The subject property consists of 18.1� acres and is located at the northeast corner of the intersection Santa Barbara Boulevard and Davis Boulevard (SR 84) in Section 4, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. (see location map, page 2). PUDA-PL20200002233; The Shoppes at Santa Barbara MPUD Revised: August 13, 2021 Page 1 of 15 Packet Pg. 1853 X-U CD C <, o D CD Dnr cQ � E o o 0 w� N N NO W N- C (D U) 0 a m u, m U) Iv v W fU N N C 0 Location Map N 0 u WILE OOO Es res „ aid P ❑ GF UD MBRIDGE EMS Compley SITE LOCATION ... UD DRI SNOPPES AT SANTA RERKSHIR BARBARA LAKES m.., PUD a MPUD Pu"0 • NEW HOPE a s E FAI LING e 3 $ MPUD A w C -3 FREESTATE TAORMINA RESERVE MPUD OK PH HE Petition Number: PL20200002233 Zoning Map 17.C.a M C M N i6 N N Q !Z O t Co w t 0 0 Packet Pg. 1854 17.C.a PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The Shoppes at Santa Barbara PUD was originally approved by Ordinance 89-62, allowing for 150,000 square feet of commercial uses proposed in the form of a commercial strip shopping center on an 18.1+/- acre site. The PUD is in Activity Center #6, which is designated through the Future Land Use Element of the Growth Management Plan for mixed use development and concentration of commercial intensity and residential density up to 16 dwelling units per acre. Two acres of the property was quit -claimed to Collier County in 1989, providing for a 60-foot wide strip of Davis Boulevard Right -of -Way and a 40-foot wide strip of Santa Barbara Boulevard Right -of -Way (Official Record Book 1483, Page 1606). A one -acre site has been developed at the corner of Davis Boulevard and Santa Barbara Boulevard with a 7-Eleven convenience store with fuel pumps. This facility is proposed to remain as a Commercial [C] designated tract, and the remaining 15.1+/- acres of the developable area of the MPUD is proposed to be designated for Mixed Use [MU] development. The 15.1+/- Mixed Use Tract is proposed to accommodate a maximum of 150,000 square feet of commercial uses, a maximum of 242 multi -family uses, or any combination of principal uses not to exceed the trip cap established in Section 5.3.H of the PUD document, which is 550 two-way PM peak hour net trips. Proposed density is 16 du/acre (15.1 acres x 16 du/acre = 242 units). No change is proposed to the maximum height of 60 feet established in the original PUD approval. Four external access points are proposed, including one along Davis Boulevard and three along Santa Barbara Boulevard. The southernmost access points is represented on the PUD Master Plan as shifted to the north of the existing driveway that currently accesses the 7-11 convenience store/gas station. The northernmost access point aligns with a cross access easement that affords connectivity to the New Hope Ministries PUD to the east via a potential interconnection depicted on the PUD Master Plan and described in PUD Document Section 5.3.I. Final Plat application FP-PL20210001774 has been submitted by the applicant to split the Mixed Use Tract with a new 2.4-acre lot along Santa Barbara Boulevard and a new 1.1-acre lot fronting Davis Boulevard, resulting in a 11.5-acre lot for the proposed multifamily project. Site Development Plan application SDP-PL20210001398 has been submitted by the applicant to develop this resulting lot with 242 multifamily dwellings. SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING: This section of the staff report identifies the land uses and zoning classifications for properties N surrounding boundaries of the subject site, The Shoppes at Santa Barbara PUD: North: Bembridge Emergency Service Complex CF/RPUD (Ordinance 21-01) — stormwater pond is immediately adjacent owned by Collier County, beyond which a is Collier County EMS Station 75, Calusa Park Elementary School, and a 5.1-acre site approved for 82 multifamily dwelling units (16 du/acre) per an Affordable Housing Density Bonus Agreement. a South: Beyond Davis Boulevard is Taormina Reserve MPUD (Ordinance 09-48) — undeveloped and approved with a Mixed Use Tract at the intersection of Davis PUDA-PL20200002233; The Shoppes at Santa Barbara MPUD Page 3 of 15 Revised: August 13, 2021 Packet Pg. 1855 17.C.a Boulevard and Santa Barbara Boulevard approved for up to 128 dwellings and 262,000 square feet of commercial development; and up to 350 dwellings on Residential Tracts to the south. Southeast of the subject site is the Boys and Girls Club of Collier County, zoned C-3. East: New Hope Ministries MPUD (Ordinance 16-41 & 17-17) — approved for residential and community facility uses with overall density of 7.6 du/acre; adjacent Residential Tract is developed as Legacy Naples Apartments with 304 units; Community Facility Tract is developed with New Hope Church approved for 800 seats West: Beyond Santa Barbara Boulevard is the Countryside community within the Berkshire Lakes PUD/DRI. Properties opposite the subject site are developed with commercial shops, a self storage facility, a golf maintenance facility and golf course. GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN (GMP) CONSISTENCY: The GMP is the prevailing document to support land -use decisions, such as this proposed amendment. Staff is required to make a recommendation regarding a finding of consistency or inconsistency with the overall GMP as part of the recommendation for approval, approval with conditions, or denial of any amendment petition. Future Land Use Element (FLUE): The subject property, as shown on the Future Land Use Map, is designated Urban, Urban Mixed Use District and Urban Residential Subdistrict and is within Mixed Use Activity Center #6. This Subdistrict is designed to concentrate almost all new commercial zoning in locations where traffic impacts can readily be accommodated, to avoid strip and disorganized patterns of commercial development, and to create focal points within the community. Mixed Use Activity Centers are intended to be mixed -use in character. Urban designated areas allow for both residential and non-residential uses. The applicant is proposing that the PUD rezoned to MPUD to allow for a maximum of 242 multi- family dwelling units plus permitted commercial uses including the existing Convenience Center with gas pumps. The Urban designation allows for a mix of residential and commercial uses. The FLUE states, "the Urban area will accommodate residential uses and a variety of non-residential uses." a PUDA-PL20200002233; The Shoppes at Santa Barbara MPUD Page 4 of 15 Revised: August 13, 2021 Packet Pg. 1856 17.C.a The applicant is proposing density at 16 du/acre, which is allowed to be requested in the Mixed Use Activity Center #6. This petition is consistent with the FLUE of the GMP. Transportation Element: In evaluating this project, staff reviewed the applicant's February 16, 2021 TIS and revised PUD Document for consistency with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the GMP. Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the GMP states: "The County Commission shall review all rezone petitions, SRA designation applications, conditional use petitions, and proposed amendments to the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) affecting the overall countywide density or intensity of permissible development, with consideration of their impact on the overall County transportation system, and shall not approve any petition or application that would directly access a deficient roadway segment as identified in the current AUIR or if it impacts an adjacent roadway segment that is deficient as identified in the current AUIR, or which significantly impacts a roadway segment or adjacent roadway segment that is currently operating and/or is projected to operate below an adopted Level of Service Standard within the five year AUIR planning period, unless specific mitigating stipulations are also approved. A petition or application has significant impacts if the traffic impact statement reveals that any of the following occur: a. For links (roadway segments) directly accessed by the project where project traffic is equal to or exceeds 2% of the adopted LOS standard service volume; b. For links adjacent to links directly accessed by the project where project traffic is equal to or exceeds 2% of the adopted LOS standard service volume; and c. For all other links the project traffic is considered to be significant up to the point where it is equal to or exceeds 3% of the adopted LOS standard service volume. Mitigating stipulations shall be based upon a mitigation plan prepared by the applicant and submitted as part of the traffic impact statement that addresses the project's significant impacts on all roadways. " Staff finding: According to the TIS and revised PUD document the proposed change will allow up to 242 multi -family residential units within the Shoppes at Santa Barbara development. The TIS for this request includes scenarios for both the currently approved PUD uses and those proposed with this amendment request. The scenarios indicate that there will be a potential decrease in the number of trips generated by this development if it includes the proposed residential use. Staff further notes that the current trip cap in Section V, Developer Commitments, 5.3.H. of the PUD document is not changing, thereby retaining the same maximum number of trips allowed currently by this development. Based on the TIS and the revised PUD, the subject petition request can be found consistent with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the Growth Management Plan because there are no additional traffic impacts resulting from the proposed changes. Conservation and Coastal Management Element (COME): Environmental Planning staff found this project to be consistent with the Conservation & Coastal Management Element (CCME). The proposed changes do not affect any of the environmental requirements of the GMP. a PUDA-PL20200002233; The Shoppes at Santa Barbara MPUD Page 5 of 15 Revised: August 13, 2021 Packet Pg. 1857 17.C.a STAFF ANALYSIS: Staff has completed a comprehensive evaluation of this land use petition, including the criteria upon which a recommendation must be based, specifically noted in LDC Section 10.02.13.B.5, Planning Commission Recommendation (commonly referred to as the "PUD Findings"), and Section 10.02.081, Nature of Requirements of Planning Commission Report (referred to as "Rezone Findings"), which establish the legal basis to support the CCPC's recommendation. An evaluation relative to these subsections is discussed below, under the heading "Zoning Services Review." Drainage: The proposed PUD Amendment request is not anticipated to create drainage problems in the area. Stormwater best management practices, treatment, and storage will be addressed through the environmental resource permitting process with the South Florida Water Management District. County staff will also evaluate the project's stormwater management system, calculations, and design criteria at the time of site development plan (SDP) and/or platting (PPL). Environmental Review: Environmental Planning staff has reviewed the PUD petition to address environmental concerns. The property has been historically cleared and maintained clear of native vegetation required to be preserved; the property was cleared in accordance with PUD Ordinance 98-22. The Master Plan does not show a preserve since no minimum preservation is required. There were no observed listed species on the property. Environmental Services staff recommends approval of the proposed petition. Landscape Review: The applicant is seeking 3 deviations regarding landscape buffers. See Deviation Discussion below. Transportation Review: Transportation Planning staff has reviewed the petition for compliance with the GMP and the LDC and recommends approval. Utilities Review: The project lies within the regional potable water and south wastewater service areas of the Collier County Water -Sewer District. Water and wastewater services are readily available via existing infrastructure along the project's frontage on Santa Barbara Boulevard and Davis Boulevard. Sufficient water and wastewater treatment capacities are available. Zoning Services Review: The intent of the Planned Unit Development Amendment (PUDA) is to redesignate from commercial development to mixed use development including the addition of residential dwellings on a 15.1+/- Mixed Use Tract at the allowable 16 units per acre within Activity Center #6, for a maximum of 242 residential units. LDC Section 10.02.13.B.5 states that "In support of its recommendation, the CCPC shall make findings as to the PUD Master Plan's compliance with the following criteria in addition to the findings in LDC Section 10.02.08": 1. The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer, water, and other utilities. a PUDA-PL20200002233; The Shoppes at Santa Barbara MPUD Revised: August 13, 2021 Page 6 of 15 Packet Pg. 1858 17.C.a Activity Center #6 is a developing mixed -use area, including New Hope MPUD currently developed with apartment complex and a church; commercial development on the west side of Santa Barbara Boulevard; and a mix of residential and non residential uses approved at Taormina Reserve MPUD to the south. Community facilities are in proximity to the site, including Calusa Park Elementary School, the Boys and Girls Club, and EMS Station 75. Given proximity to the Elementary School and the existence of sidewalk offering a safe path to school between the New Hope PUD to the school, staff is recommending that the interconnection provided between Shoppes of Santa Barbara PUD and New Hope PUD include pedestrian connection for the school children introduced on the subject project through the proposed addition of residential units. Calusa Park Activity Center #6 is outlined in purple School Sidewalk Connection Opportunity o t co The Growth Management Plan encourages mixed use development within Activity Centers. Traffic, drainage, and utility capacities have been analyzed and have been found a adequate for the proposed development. Water transmission and wastewater transmission W mains are readily available within the Santa Barbara Boulevard and Davis Boulevard tt: rights -of -way, and there is adequate water and wastewater treatment capacity to serve the Cn proposed PUD. N 2. Adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of any proposed agreements, o contracts, or other instruments, or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing E operation and maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense. a Documents submitted with the application, which were reviewed by the County Attorney's Office, demonstrate unified control of the Mixed Use Tract that is the subject of this PUD Amendment. PUDA-PL20200002233; The Shoppes at Santa Barbara MPUD Page 7 of 15 Revised: August 13, 2021 Packet Pg. 1859 17.C.a 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Conformity of the proposed Planned Unit Development with the goals, objectives, and policies of the Growth Management Plan (GMP). County staff has reviewed this petition and has offered an analysis of conformity with the relevant goals, objectives, and policies of the GMP within the GMP Consistency portion of this staff report on page 5. The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening requirements. The existing commercial development was approved for a maximum building height of 60 feet, and no change is proposed. Three deviations have been requested for alternative buffering internal and external to the site. Deviation 2 is to allow a shared 15-foot Type B buffer between internal residential and commercial uses. Deviation 3 is for a 5-foot wide buffer with plantings that are 80% opaque at 6 feet in eight within one year of planting where proposed residential dwellings will abut Legacy Naples Apartments to the east. Deviation 6 is to allow no buffer along the northern boundary of the project given that a cross access easement occupies the northern boundary and the adjacent condition is a stormwater pond. These deviations are warranted per the unique existing conditions, and staff finds that compatibility is addressed internally and externally. The adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the development. The open space requirement for Mixed Use development is 30%, and the applicant indicates this will be provided. No deviation from the required usable open space is being requested. Compliance would be demonstrated at the time of SDP or PPL. The timing or sequence of development for the purpose of ensuring the adequacy of available improvements and facilities, both public and private. n a The roadway infrastructure will continue to be sufficient to serve the proposed project, as noted in the Transportation Element consistency review. Operational impacts will be co addressed at time of each development order (SDP or Plat), at which time a new TIS will c be required to demonstrate turning movements for all site access points. Finally, the project's development must comply with all other applicable concurrency management regulations when development approvals, including but not limited to any plats and or site iW development plans, are sought. N Collier County has sufficient treatment capacity for water and wastewater services to the project. Conveyance capacity must be confirmed at the time of development permit c application. Impact fees are imposed to account for public facility impacts, and these will be required at time of development permitting. E The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate Q expansion. PUDA-PL20200002233; The Shoppes at Santa Barbara MPUD Revised: August 13, 2021 Page 8 of 15 Packet Pg. 1860 17.C.a The area has adequate supporting infrastructure, including adjacent Collier County Water - Sewer District potable water and wastewater mains, to accommodate this project. The MPUD boundary is not proposed to be modified and cannot be expanded due to existing development to the north and east and existing public roadways to the south and west. 8. Conformity with PUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the particular case, based on determination that such modifications are justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations. Six deviations are proposed in connection with this request to amend the PUD. See deviations review section beginning on page 12 of this report. Rezone Findings: LDC Subsection 10.02.08.17 states, "When pertaining to the rezoning of land, the report and recommendations to the planning commission to the Board of County Commissioners... shall show that the planning commission has studied and considered proposed change in relation to the following when applicable": 1. Whether the proposed change will be consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the Future Land Use Map and the elements of the GMP. Comprehensive Planning staff determined the subject petition is consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the Future Land Use Element and other elements of the GMP. 2. The existing land use pattern. The surrounding land use pattern is described in the Surrounding Land Use and Zoning section of this staff report. The mix of uses emerging in the vicinity of the subject site are consistent with the existing pattern and the allowable uses in this Activity Center and surrounding area. 3. The possible creation of an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts The proposed MPUD district will be related to other nearby MPUD districts Interconnection is proposed with the adjacent MPUD, so it is not isolated nor unrelated. 4. Whether existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the property proposed for change. Existing district boundaries are logically drawn, and no change to the boundaries of the PUD are proposed. 5. Whether changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed rezoning necessary. The proposed change is not necessary; however, it is being requested in compliance with the LDC provisions to seek such changes because the petitioner wishes to include the proposed uses and development standards that are specific to the subject parcel. Multi- family residential is a viable addition/alternative to the previously authorized 150,000 a PUDA-PL20200002233; The Shoppes at Santa Barbara MPUD Revised: August 13, 2021 Page 9 of 15 Packet Pg. 1861 17.C.a square feet of commercial use on the property. The PUD in effect does not permit residential development on this tract; therefore, the PUD Amendment is necessary in order to provide for the addition of potential residential development. 6. Whether the proposed change will adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood. The proposed PUD Amendment introduces more residential activity to the area, which contributes to, and is not anticipated to adversely influence, living conditions in the neighborhood. 7. Whether the proposed change will create or excessively increase traffic congestion or create types of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses, because of peak volumes or projected types of vehicular traffic, including activity during construction phases of the development, or otherwise affect public safety. The roadway infrastructure will continue to have adequate capacity to serve the proposed project at this time, i.e., GMP consistent at the time of rezoning as evaluated as part of the GMP Transportation Element consistency review. Operational impacts will be addressed at time of each development order (SDP or Plat). Additionally, the project's development must comply with all other applicable concurrency management regulations when development approvals are sought. 8. Whether the proposed change will create a drainage problem. The proposed PUD Amendment request is not anticipated to create adverse drainage impacts in the area; provided stormwater best management practices, treatment, and storage on this project are addressed through Environmental Resource Permitting (ERP) with the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD). County staff will evaluate the project's stormwater management system, calculations, and design criteria at the time of SDP and/or PPL. A 40-foot wide drainage easement is proposed to be dedicated along the entire east side of the property to assist with area flow patterns. The easement is specified as a Development Commitment in Section 5.4 of the PUD document and depicted as Exhibit C of the PUD document. 9. Whether the proposed change will seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas. n a� No change is proposed to the already permitted building height of 60 feet. It is not tt: anticipated the changes proposed to this PUD Amendment would seriously reduce light or air to the adjacent areas. N 10. Whether the proposed change will adversely affect property values in the adjacent areas. c c Property valuation is affected by a host of factors including zoning; however, zoning by E itself may or may not affect values, since value determination is driven by market forces. a 11. Whether the proposed change will be a deterrent to the improvement or development of adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations. PUDA-PL20200002233; The Shoppes at Santa Barbara MPUD Page 10 of 15 Revised: August 13, 2021 Packet Pg. 1862 17.C.a Adjacent properties to the north and east are already developed. The addition of residential units as a permitted use is not anticipated to serve as a deterrent to the improvement of adjacent property. 12. Whether the proposed change will constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual owner as contrasting with the public welfare. The proposed PUD Amendment is consistent with policies of the Growth Management Plan, so proposed amendment can be deemed to be in alignment with public welfare and not a grant of special privilege. 13. Whether there are substantial reasons why the property cannot be used in accordance with existing zoning. The subject property can be developed with commercial uses in accordance with existing zoning; however, the proposed residential uses cannot be developed without amending the PUD. 14. Whether the change suggested is out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the County. The proposed uses, associated development standards, and developer commitments help ensure that the project is not out of scale with the needs of the community. 15. Whether is it impossible to find other adequate sites in the County for the proposed use in districts already permitting such use. Other sites in the County do accommodate residential development. The petition was reviewed for compliance with the GMP and the LDC, and staff did not do comparisons or evaluations of other sites in the course of review of this petition. 16. The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site alteration, which would be required to make the property usable for any of the range of potential uses under the proposed zoning classification. The site has been previously cleared and is partially developed with a commercial use. Additional site alternation is anticipated for development consistent with this proposed amendment. The applicant has already submitted development applications including Final Plat application FP-PL20210001774 to split the Mixed Use Tract with a new 2.4-acre lot along Santa Barbara Boulevard and a new 1.1-acre lot fronting Davis Boulevard, resulting in a 11.5-acre lot for the proposed multifamily project; and Site Development Plan application SDP-PL20210001398 to develop this resulting lot with 242 multifamily dwellings. These applications will undergo evaluation against local development regulations, and the proposed development will be further reviewed through the building permitting process. 17. The impact of development on the availability of adequate public facilities and services consistent with the levels of service adopted in the Collier County Growth Management Plan and as defined and implemented through the Collier County Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance, as amended. a PUDA-PL20200002233; The Shoppes at Santa Barbara MPUD Revised: August 13, 2021 Page 11 of 15 Packet Pg. 1863 17.C.a Public facility capacities have been reviewed as part of this application process. Traffic, drainage, and utility capacities have been found adequate for the proposed development. The activity proposed by this amendment will have no adverse impact on public utilities facility adequacy. 18. Such other factors, standards, or criteria that the Board of County Commissioners shall deem important in the protection of the public health, safety, and welfare. To be determined by the Board during its advertised public hearing. DEVIATION DISCUSSION: The PUD was originally approved via Ordinance 89-062 with no deviations. The petitioner is now seeking six deviations as part of this PUD Amendment request. Attachment B contains the justifications put forth by the petitioner. The petitioner's request and staff analysis/recommendation are listed below. Deviation #1: (Parking Spaces) "Deviation #1 seeks relief from LDC Section 4.05.04 G., "Spaces required. Table 17. Parking Space Requirements." Multi -family Dwellings, which requires where small-scale recreation facilities are accessory to a single-family or multifamily project and intended only for the residents of that project, exclusive of golf courses/clubhouses, the recreation facilities may be computed at 50 percent of normal requirements where the majority of the dwelling units are not within 300 feet of the recreation facilities and at 25 percent of normal requirements where the majority of the dwelling units are within 300 feet of the recreation facilities. However, any recreation facility shall have a minimum of 2 spaces exclusive of parking spaces for dwelling units, to instead allow parking for all amenities to be calculated at 1 space per 500 square feet of enclosed clubhouse facilities." StaffAnalysis and Recommendation: Staff recommends APPROVAL finding that the petitioner has demonstrated that pedestrian interconnectivity is provided, and the clubhouse and primary residential amenities will be located central to most of the residential units as shown on the schematic layout for the residential development option. Deviation #2: (Internal Buffer Requirements) "Deviation #2 seeks relief from LDC Section 4.06.02 C., Table 2.4 Table of Buffer Requirements by Land Use Classifications, which requires each development type to provide a 15 foot wide type B buffer where residential and commercial are adjacent to each other to instead allow a shared 15- foot wide type B landscape buffer between commercial and residential tracts with each property contributing 7.5 feet." StaffAnalysis and Recommendation: Staff recommends APPROVAL, finding that the petitioner has demonstrated that the element may be waived without detrimental effect on the health, safety and welfare of the community per LDC section 10.02.13.A.3. Because the intent of a 15-foot Type B buffer separating residential and commercial tracts is met through this shared arrangement, and given that mix of use environments are intended to be integrated in Activity Center locations such as this site, the petitioner has demonstrated that the deviation is justified as meeting public purposes PUDA-PL20200002233; The Shoppes at Santa Barbara MPUD Page 12 of 15 Revised: August 13, 2021 Packet Pg. 1864 17.C.a to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations per LDC section 10.02.13.B.5.h. Deviation #3: (Eastern Buffer Requirement) "Deviation #3 seeks relief from LDC Section 4.06.02 C., Table 2.4 Table of Buffer Requirements by Land Use Classifications, which requires a 10 foot wide type A landscape buffer if developed with multi -family residential along the eastern PUD boundary to instead allow a 5 foot wide landscape buffer with a single row hedge planted on the slope of the berm along the eastern PUD boundary south of the New Hope Ministries PUD preserve area, if a mixed use project including residential dwellings is developed on the Mixed Use Tract. The single hedge shall be planted at 5 feet height and 4 foot on center and shall be a minimum of 6 feet in height and 80% opaque within one year." StaffAnalysis and Recommendation: Staff recommends APPROVAL, finding that the petitioner has demonstrated that the element may be waived without detrimental effect on the health, safety and welfare of the community per LDC section 10.02.13.A.3. Because the intent of a Type A buffer between similar multifamily uses would provide for trees only, and the petitioner proposes a hedge that provides a higher degree of opacity at the levels of vehicle lights and eye level, the petitioner as demonstrated that the deviation is justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations per LDC section 10.02.13.B.5.h. Deviation #4 & #5: (Slope Ground Cover & Slope Ratio) "Deviation #4 seeks relief from LDC Section 4.06.05 J., Slope Table 4.06.05 J. and Slope Cross Section 4.06.05 J., which require a slope ratio no steeper than 2:1 to be treated with Rip -rap or other forms of erosion and scour protection to instead allow a slope ratio of 2:1 to be treated with ground cover or grass in lieu of rip -rap for stabilization for the drainage swale along the east property line which drains offsite flow from the north. "Deviation #5 seeks relief from LDC Section 6.05.01 K., Outfall ditches and open channels, which requires unless otherwise approved by the County Manager or designee pursuant to section 10.02.04 of the LDC, side slopes no steeper than four to one will be allowed. Protection against scour and erosion will be provided as required by the County Manager or designee to instead allow a side slope of 2:1 with ground cover or grass for stabilization for the drainage swale along the east property line which drains offsite flow from the north." StaffAnalysis and Recommendation: Staff sees no detrimental effect if these deviation requests are approved and recommends APPROVAL. The applicant justifies these requests with the explanation that the replacement drainage swale will be located within a 40-foot-wide drainage easement. The swale is proposed to be approximately 4.0 feet deep from finished grade with a 2:1 slope ratio. This shallow swale can be maintained and stabilized with ground cover or grass, and rip -rap is unnecessary in this application. The property owner association will be responsible for maintenance of this drainage swale. Deviation #6: (Northern Buffer Requirement) "Deviation #6 seeks relief from LDC Section 4.06.02 C., Table 2.4 Table of Buffer Requirements by Land Use Classifications, which requires landscape buffering and screening standards within any planned unit development shall conform to the minimum buffering and screening standards of the zoning district to which it most closely resembles which would require a 10 foot wide type A PUDA-PL20200002233; The Shoppes at Santa Barbara MPUD Page 13 of 15 Revised: August 13, 2021 Packet Pg. 1865 17.C.a landscape buffer between mixed use developments, to instead allow no buffer along the northern PUD boundary." Staff Analysis and Recommendation: Staff recommends APPROVAL of this deviation, finding that the unique circumstances to the north of the EMS facility and water management lake that has an established buffer between the lake and the EMS building, as well as the arrangement of a cross access easement along the northern property line affording access to adjoining property. The petitioner has demonstrated that the element may be waived without a detrimental effect on the health, safety, and welfare of the community per LDC Section 10.02.13.A.3 and that the deviation is justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations per LDC Section 10.02.13.B.5.h. NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING (NIM): The applicant conducted a NIM on May 18, 2021 at New Hope Ministries located adjacent to the east of the subject site. The meeting was attended by one member of the public. The option to attend remotely via Zoom was also available, but no members of the public attended via Zoom. The meeting commenced at approximately 5:30 p.m. and was 11 minutes long. Following a presentation overviewing the PUD Amendment, Wayne Arnold answered questions indicating the current building height of 60 feet would accommodate Eve story buildings; potential commercial users are unknown; and target construction timeframe is 2022. No commitments were proposed or discussed. A copy of the NIM materials are included in Attachment B. ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL (EAC) RECOMMENDATION: This project does not require Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) review, as this project did not meet the EAC scope of land development project reviews as identified in Section 2-1193 of the Collier County Codes of Laws and Ordinances. COUNTY ATTORNEY OFFICE REVIEW: The County Attorney's Office reviewed this staff report on August 16, 2021. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the CCPC forward Petition PUDA-PL20200002233 for The Shoppes at Santa Barbara MPUD to the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) with a recommendation of approval subject to the following conditions: 1. Revise notation on PUD Master Plan to indicate vehicle and (not or) pedestrian interconnection will be provided in the northeast corner of the PUD where the road and sidewalk dead -ends on the New Hope PUD. 2. Add language to Developer Commitment 5.3.I to clearly state that the Shoppes of Santa Barbara PUD owner will construct a sidewalk stub out to the property line in conjunction with construction of residential units, and if the owner of the New Hope PUD agrees, the developer of the Shoppes at Santa Barbara PUD would physically make the sidewalk connection. a PUDA-PL20200002233; The Shoppes at Santa Barbara MPUD Revised: August 13, 2021 Page 14 of 15 Packet Pg. 1866 17.C.a Attachments: A) Draft Ordinance B) Application/Backup Materials C) Hybrid Meeting Waiver r N t0 O r C d E L V f� a+ a PUDA-PL20200002233; The Shoppes at Santa Barbara MPUD Revised: August 13, 2021 Page 15 of 15 Packet Pg. 1867 17.C.b ORDINANCE NO.2021 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 89-62, AS AMENDED, THE SHOPPES AT SANTA BARBARA PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT BY ADDING DWELLING UNITS AS A PERMITTED USE; BY AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 2004- 41, AS AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, WHICH ESTABLISHED THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BY AMENDING THE APPROPRIATE ZONING ATLAS MAP OR MAPS BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY FROM A COMMERCIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (CPUD) ZONING DISTRICT TO A MIXED -USE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (MPUD) ZONING DISTRICT FOR THE PROJECT TO BE KNOWN AS THE SHOPPES AT SANTA BARBARA MPUD, BY ALLOWING UP TO, WITH A MIX TO BE DETERMINED BY MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE TRAFFIC GENERATION, 150,000 SQUARE FEET OF COMMERCIAL USES AND 242 DWELLING UNITS IN ADDITION TO THE PREVIOUSLY APPROVED COMMERCIAL USES; BY ADDING DEVIATIONS, BY REVISING DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS AND AMENDING THE MASTER PLAN. THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST QUADRANT OF SANTA BARBARA AND DAVIS BOULEVARDS, IN SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, CONSISTING OF 18.1f ACRES; AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. [PL20200002233] WHEREAS, Wayne Arnold, AICP of Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. and Richard D. Yovanovich, Esq. of Coleman, Yovanovich & Koester, PA, representing Altman Development Company, LLC, petitioned the Board of County Commissioners to change the zoning classification of the herein described real property. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that: [21-CPS -02094/1656031/1176 Shoppes at Santa Barbara /PL20200002233 Page 1 of 2 9/8/2l Packet Pg. 1868 17.C.b SECTION ONE: The zoning classification of the herein described real property located in Section 4, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, is changed from a Commercial Planned Unit Development (CPUD) Zoning District to a Mixed -Use Planned Unit Development (MPUD) for a 18.1± acre project to be known as The Shoppes at Santa Barbara MPUD, to allow construction of a maximum of 242 dwelling units and commercial uses in accordance with the MPUD Document attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated by reference herein. The appropriate zoning atlas map or maps, as described in Ordinance Number 2004-41, as amended, the Collier County Land Development Code, is/are hereby amended accordingly. SECTION TWO: This Ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Department of State. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by super -majority vote of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this day of ATTEST: CRYSTAL K. KINZEL, CLERK , Deputy Clerk Approved as to form and legality: Heidi Ashton-Cicko Managing Assistant County Attorney Attachments: Exhibit A — MPUD Document 1►• 041 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA am [2 1 -CPS-02094/1656031/1176 Shoppes at Santa Barbara /PL20200002233 Page 2 of 2 9/8/21 Penny Taylor, Chairman Packet Pg. 1869 17.C.b THE SHOPPES AT SANTA BARBARA GONG PT r n r MIXED USE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT 18.1 ACRES LOCATED IN SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA a., 9, AMENDMENT PREPARED BY: Q. GRADY MINOR & ASSOCIATES, P.A. D. WAYNE ARNOLD, AICP 3800 VIA DEL REY. BONITA SPRINGS. FL 34134 AND COLEMAN, YOVANOVICH & KOESTER, P.A. RICHARD D. YOVANOVICH, ESQ. 4001 TAMIAMI TRAIL NORTH, SUITE 300 NAPLES, FL 34103 Words struek through are deleted, words underlined are added. The Shoppes at Santa Barbara PUDA (PL20190002356) September 2, 2021 Page 1 of 23 Packet Pg. 1870 17.C.b TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION I PAGE STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE AND SHORT TITLE - - - - - 4-3 SECTION II PROPERTY nAxn E cure n D LEGAL DESCRIPTION ' 24 SECTION III STATEMENT OF INTENT AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION - ' ' 3-45 SECTION IV GENERAL DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS - - - - - - - - - - -5-96 SECTION V DEVELOPER COMMITMENTS 13 EN 11 )N 4E-NTAT STANDARDS . 1011 SECTION VI DEVIATIONS 16 LIST OF EXHIBITS EXHIBIT A EXHIBIT B CONCEPTUAL A L IWATER NI A N A GEMENTMASTER PLAN NOTES' ' EXHIBIT C STATEMENT ENT OFUNIFIED CONTROL O . —DRAINAGE EASEMENT Words struek through are deleted; words underlined are added. The Shoppes at Santa Barbara PUDA (PL20190002356) September Z 2021 Page 2 of 23 Packet Pg. 1871 17.C.b SECTION I STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE AND SHORT TITLE I. The purpose of this section is to set forth the intent of the developer- development within an 18.1 acre tract of land located in a part of Section 4, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. The development of the P.U.D. will be in compliance with the planning goals and objectives of Collier County as set forth in the Comprehensive Plan for the following reasons: 1. The subject property is located in an area identified as an Activity Center in the Comprehensive Plan for Collier County. 2. Activity Centers are the preferred locations for the concentration of commercial and mixed use development activities. 3. The subject tract is strategically located at the intersection of Davis Boulevard, (State Road 84) and Santa Barbara Boulevard, which affords the site superior access for the placement of commercial land use activities. 4. The project shall be in compliance with all applicable County regulations including the Comprehensive Plan. 5. The project will be served by a complete range of services and utilities as approved by the County. 6. The project is compatible with adjacent land uses through the internal arrangement of structures, the placement of land use buffers, and the proposed development standards contained herein. Il. This ordinance shall be known and cited as the "Shoppes at Santa Barbara Planned Unit Development Ordinance". 4- Words struek through are deleted, words underlined are added. The Shoppes at Santa Barbara PUDA (PL20190002356) September 2, 2021 Page 3 of 23 Packet Pg. 1872 17.C.b SECTION II The West half of the Southwest quarter of the Southwest quarter of Section 4, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, LESS the Westerly 60 feet thereof for Santa Barbara Boulevard and Less the Southerly 75 feet thereof for State Road 84 (Davis Boulevard). N Words struek through are deleted, words underlined are added. The Shoppes at Santa Barbara PUDA (PL20190002356) September 2, 2021 Page 4 of 23 Packet Pg. 1873 17.C.b SECTION III STATEMENT OF INTENT AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION 3.1 INTRODUCTION It is the developer's intent to establish a e mmer-eia eeffte rp oject to meet community wide residential and/or commercial sl�epp needs. It is the purpose of this document to set forth flexible guidelines for the future development of the project that meet accepted planning principles and practices and implement the Comprehensive Land Use Plan. 3.2 PLAN APPROVAL The location of land uses are shown on the Geneeptual PUDExhibit A, Master Plan. Changes and variations in building location and the mix of land uses shall be permitted via Site Development Plan approval in accordance with Se tie 10.5 of the Land Development Code (LDC). Changes and variations in building tracts may be permitted during Site Development Plan approval if, at the discretion of the County Manager, or his designee, such changes and variations are in conformance with the substantive and procedural requirements of the Subdivision Regulations. However, this shall not be construed to require an amendment to any plat of this development unless such change or variance results in a change of lot lines on the plat. 3.3 LAND USES The location of land uses mare shown on . Exhibit A, Master Plan. The maximum number of square feet of retail or office floor area to be permitted, not including that permitted on the eiA P Commercial Tract, shall be one hundred fifty thousand (150,000) square feet of floor area. The maximum number of multi family dwelling units permitted shall be 242 units. The residential and commercial mix shall be determined by maximum allowable trip cap established in Section 5.3.H of the PUD. 3.4 SITE CLEARING AND DRAINAGE Clearing, grading, earthwork, and site drainage work shall be performed in accordance with applicable Collier County Codes and Ordinances, and the standards and commitments of this document. 3.5 EASEMENTS FOR UTILITIES Easements, where required, shall be provided for water management areas, utilities and other purposes as may be needed. All necessary easements, dedications, or other instruments shall be granted to insure the continued operation and maintenance of all services and utilities in compliance with applicable regulations in effect at the time approvals are requested. Words struek through are deleted, words underlined are added. The Shoppes at Santa Barbara PUDA (PL20190002356) September 2, 2021 Page 5 of 23 Packet Pg. 1874 17.C.b 4 SECTION IV GENERAL DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS 4.1 PURPOSE The purpose of this section is to delineate the development regulations that accompany the Conceptual Master Plan depicted in Exhibit A. A maximum of 150,000 square feet of commercial uses and a maximum of 242 multi -family uses or any combination of principal uses shall be permitted on Mixed Use Tract identified on the Master Plan, not to exceed the trip cap established in Section 5.3.H of the PUD. 4.2 GENERAL Where specific standards pertaining to such things as signage and landscaping are not specifically included in this document, the applicable standards of the Collier County Land Development Code that are in effect at the time of permit application shall apply. 4.3 USES PERMITTED No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or part, for other than the following: A. Principal Uses — Commercial Tract 1. Automobile service stations (no repair services) (in accordance with the standards of tion ''�of the Land Development Code in effect at the time of application for permits); antique shops; appliance stores; art studios; art supply shops; automobile parts stores. 2. Bakery shops; bait and tackle shops; banks and financial institutions; barber and beauty shops; bath supply stores; bicycle sales and services; blueprint shops; bookbinders; book stores; business machine services. Car washes (enclosed only); carpet and floor covering sales — which may include storage and installation; child care centers (no less than five hundred feet from an establishment selling or serving alcoholic beverages for consumption on premises unless an exemption is granted pursuant to the requirements of Seet on 2.6.' of the Land Development Code in effect at the time of application for permits); churches and other places of worship; clothing stores; cocktail lounges (in accordance with the standards of Seeti n 2.6.' of the Land Development Code in effect at the time of application for permits); commercial recreation uses — indoor; commercial schools; confectionary and candy stores. Words struek through are deleted; words underlined are added. The Shoppes at Santa Barbara PUDA (PL20190002356) September 2, 2021 Page 6 of 23 Packet Pg. 1875 17.C.b 4. Delicatessens; department stores; drug stores; dry cleaning shops; dry good stores; and drapery shops. 5. Electrical supply stores; equipment rentals including lawn mowers and power saws, which may include their repair and sale. 6. Fish market — retail only; florist shops; funeral homes; furniture stores; furrier shops. 7. Garden supply stores — outside display in side and rear yards; gift shops; glass and mirror sales — including storage and installation; gourmet shops. 8. Hardware stores; hat cleaning and blocking; health food stores; homes for the aged; hospitals and hospices. 9. Ice cream; stores. 10. Jewelry stores. 11. Leather goods; legitimate theatres; liquor stores; locksmiths. 12. Marinas; markets — food; markets — meat; medical offices and clinics; millinery shops; motels and hotels; motion picture theatres; museums; music stores; mini warehouses and storage facilities; minor automobile repair work. 13. New car dealerships — outside display permitted; news stores. 14. Office — general; office supply stores. 15. Paint and wallpaper stores; pet shops; pet supply shops; photographic equipment stores; pottery stores; printing; publishing and mimeograph services shops; professional offices. 16. Radio and television sales and services; radio station (offices and studios), and auxiliary transmitters and receiving equipment, but not principal transmission tower; research and design labs; rest homes; restaurants — including drive-in or fast food restaurants (in accordance with the standards of Seeti "' 2.6.' n of the Land Development Code in effect at the time of application for permits). 17. Shoe repair; shoe stores; shopping centers; souvenir stores; stationery stores; supermarkets and sanatoriums. 18. Tailor shops; taxidermists; tile sales — ceramic tile; tobacco shops; toy shops; tropical fish stores. 19. Upholstery shops. Words struek through are deleted; words underlined are added. The Shoppes at Santa Barbara PUDA (PL20190002356) September 2, 2021 Page 7 of 23 Packet Pg. 1876 17.C.b 20. Variety stores; vehicle rental — automobile only; veterinarian offices and clinics — no outside kennels. 21. Watch and precision instrument repair shops. 22. Any other commercial use or professional service which is comparable in nature with the foregoing list of permitted, as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals "BZA", or the Hearing Examiner. eempa4ible with the above eses. B. Principal Uses — Mixed Use Tract 1. All commercial uses listed above in 4.3.A. 2. Dwelling Units, Multi -family (not to exceed a maximum of 242 units) 3. Any other principal use, which is comparable in nature with the foregoing list of permitted principal uses, as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals (`BZA") or the Hearing Examiner. C. Accessory Uses - Commercial and Mixed Usefi Tracts Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with permitted uses in this district including essential services. 2. Water management facilities to serve the project such as lakes. 3. Open space uses and structures such as, but not limited to, boardwalks, nature trails, gazebos and picnic areas. 4. Any other accessory and related use that is determined to be comparable in nature with the foregoing uses and consistent with the permitted accessory uses of this MPUD as determined by the BZA or the Hearing Examiner 4.4 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS: A. Minimum Site Area: Twenty thousand (20,000) square feet. B. Minimum Site Width: One hundred and fifty (150) feet. C. Minimum Distance Between Principal Structures: Words struek through are deleted, words underlined are added. The Shoppes at Santa Barbara PUDA (PL20190002356) September 2, 2021 Page 8 of 23 Packet Pg. 1877 17.C.b Twenty (20) feet. D. Minimum Setbacks Out Parcels: 1. Principal Structure: (a) Front: Fifty (50) feet (b) Side: Twenty (20) feet (c) Rear: Twenty (20) feet 2. Accessory structure (including canopies) (a) Front: Fifty (50) feet (b) Side: Ten (10) feet (c) Rear: Ten (10) feet (d) Minimum distance between structures: Ten (10) feet. E. Minimum Setbacks For Structures Not Located In Out Parcels: 1. Shopping Center: (a) Davis Boulevard Futwe Right -Of -Way: Seventy-five (75) feet. (b) Northerly Access Road Right -Of -Way: Fifty (50) feet. (c) Santa Barbara Boulevard: Seventy-five (75) feet. (d) East Property Line: Seventy-five (75) feet. (e) From Out Parcel Boundary: One half (1/2) the sum of building heights. 2. Residential only: a) Davis Boulevard Right-Of-Wav: Seventy-five (75) feet. (b) Northerly Access Road Right -Of -Way: Fifty (50,) feet. (c) Santa Barbara Boulevard: Six1(60,) feet. (d) East Property Line: Fifty (50,) feet. (e) Internal Tract Boundary: Twenty (20) feet. -2-.3.Out Buildings: (a) Santa Barbara Boulevard: Seventy-five (75) feet, however, buildings less than five thousand (5,000) square feet may have a forty (40) foot setback. (b) Davis Boulevard Future Right -Of -Way: Seventy-five (75) feet. (c) Northerly Access Road Right -Of -Way: Fifty (50) feet. (d) East Property Line: Seventy-five (75) feet. (e) From Out Parcel Boundary: Zero (0) or five (5) feet. �4. Accessory Structures: Words st-F&e-kthr-eogh are deleted; words underlined are added. The Shoppes at Santa Barbara PUDA (PL20190002356) September 2, 2021 Page 9 of 23 Packet Pg. 1878 17.C.b (a) Street Frontages: Th�(530) feet. (b) From Eastern PUD Boundary: FoM (40,) feet (b)Lc) From Out Parcel Boundary: Zero (0) or five (5) feet. (O(d) Minimum Distance Between Structures: Ten (10) feet. F. Minimum Site Width: One hundred and fifty (150) feet. G. Maximum Height of Structures: g (a) Commercial Buildings shall have a zoned height of Sixty (60) feet. (b) Residential buildings shall have a maximum actual height of forty-five (45) feet except residential buildings along the eastern boundary shall have maximum actual height of sixty 60 feet. H. Parking: The same as the standards of the Collier County Land Development Code in effect at the time of application for permits or as approved by deviation. I. Open Space and Landscaped Area: A minimum of 30% of the property shall be maintained as open space for which a credit is provided for dedicated areas, landscaped areas and retention areas. - 70 k, . „110 ME ._ I-J.Minimum Floor Area Principal Structure: Commercial - One thousand (1,000) square feet with the exception of automobile service stations which may be nine hundred (900) square feet. Residential — Seven hundred fifty (750)square feet 0 Words struek through are deleted, words underlined are added. The Shoppes at Santa Barbara PUDA (PL20190002356) September 2, 2021 Page 10 of 23 Packet Pg. 1879 17.C.b 1110 11. ��IRA G. All exetie >as defified ift the Getmty Code, shall be removed dur-ing eaeh phase of d,�e�y� f fflie 2 afl Words struek through are deleted; words underlined are added. The Shoppes at Santa Barbara PUDA (PL20190002356) September Z 2021 Page 11 of 23 Q 0 D a �a L E L CU m M M Cn M d O t Co t u Q Packet Pg. 1880 17.C.b ■ �eeesee*:ss�r�ae�sasss�r.Ers�.s _ !ers�r:�rrrss il■_ ■_ Mill INN NO MON . . ......... 44 Words struck threug4 are deleted; words underlined are added. The Shoppes at Santa Barbara PUDA (PL20190002356) September 2, 2021 Page 12 of 23 Packet Pg. 1881 17.C.b SECTION VI TRAP4SPORTATIW4 REQUI -EMENT DEVELOPER COMMITMENTS 645.1 PUD MONITORING One entity (hereinafter the Managing EntiW shall be responsible for PUD monitoring until close-out of the PUD, and this entity shall also be responsible for satisfying all PUD commitments until close- out of the PUD. At the time of this PUD approval, the Manning Entitv is Altman Development Q Company, LLC. Should the Managing Entity desire to transfer the monitoring and commitments to a D successor entity, then it must provide a copy of a legally binding document that needs to be approved for legal sufficiency by the County Attorney. After such approval, the Managing Entity will be released of its obligations upon written approval of the transfer by County staff, and the successor entity shall become the Managing Entity. As Owner and Developer sell off tracts, the Managing Entity M shall provide written notice to County that includes an acknowledgement of the commitments required M by the PUD by the new owner and the new owner's agreement to comply with the Commitments M through the Managing Entity, but the Managing Entity shall not be relieved of its responsibili , under N this Section. When the PUD is closed -out, then the Managing Entity is no longer responsible for the Q. monitoring and fulfillment of PUD commitments. 0 co 5.2 MISCELLANEOUS A. All other applicable state or federal permits must be obtained before commencement of the 0 development. N T B. Pursuant to Section 125.022(5) F.S., Issuance of a development permit by a county does not in any w way create any rights on the part of the applicant to obtain a permit from a state or federal agency rn and does not create any liability on the part of the county for issuance of the permit if the applicant fails to obtain requisite approvals or fulfill the obligations imposed by a state or federal agency or undertakes actions that result in a violation of state or federal law. c �a 5.3 TRANSPORTATION O developer- must ufidet4ake as an integfal paA of the pr-qjeet . a c ef the a� These developments e-A-4-4-sis. z A. The developer shall provide 40 feet of road right-of-way along Santa Barbara Boulevard. r Commitment complete. Q B. The developer shall provide right turn lanes at each entrance along Santa Barbara Boulevard with the exception of the northernmost entrance which may be left directional and shall be right -out only access, btA the !a- es shall not be eatit+u us be�wee entf,r Compensatory right-of-way shall not be required for each turn lane. Collier County reserves the right to modify and close M median openings in its sole discretion in the exercise of its police power. Words struek through are deleted, words underlined are added. The Shoppes at Santa Barbara PUDA (PL20190002356) September 2, 2021 Page 13 of 23 Packet Pg. 1882 17.C.b C. The access on Davis Boulevard shall be limited to right turns in and right turns out. It shall have no median opening upon the multi-laning of that road. E-. D. The developer shall provide a fair share contribution toward the capital cost of traffic signals at accesses on Santa Barbara Boulevard when deemed warranted by the County. The signals shall be owned, operated and maintained by Collier County. Commitment complete. IiE. The developer --owner shall provide arterial level street lighting at all project entrances. F. If a future median opening is permitted on Santa Barbara Boulevard to serve a joint -use entrance at the northern boundary of the project, the benefiting property owners shall be responsible for the construction costs of the opening and all associated turn lanes. 14. These impr-evemepAs afe eensider-ed "site Felated" as defined in Or-dinanee 85 55 a -ad shall not be 4-2 Words struek through are deleted, words underlined are added. The Shoppes at Santa Barbara PUDA (PL20190002356) September 2, 2021 Page 14 of 23 Packet Pg. 1883 17.C.b P,G. Payment of $35,000 based upon prior right-of-way acquisition (1.82 acres @ $11,000/acre) of $20,000 and prior median opening/driveway of $15,000; payment to be made and applied to the S.R. 84 four-laning project upon start of construction contract for S.R. 84 segment between Santa Barbara Boulevard and County Barn Road. Commitment complete. 4-3 O • I VA ■ • . • • .11 ON—• • Alm. H. The maximum total daily trip eneration for the Mixed Use Tract shall not exceed 550 two-way PM peak hour net trips based on the use codes in the ITE Manual on trip generation rates in effect at the time of application for SDP/SDPA or subdivision plat approval. I. The owner shall provide at owner's expense an ingress/egress easement in favor of all of the owners in the New Hope PUD to allow for the connection of Piazza Ct in the New Hope PUD through the MU tract to that portion of the 60-foot cross easement identified on the Exhibit A, Master Plan located on county property, allowing for the extension of Piazza Ct to Santa Barbara Boulevard. Collier County will have no maintenance responsibility. No direct connection through or into, the gated residential project located in the Shoppes at Santa Barbara PUD will be permitted by the New Hope PUD from this interconnection. The construction of the roadway interconnection shall occur at the sole expense of the owner of the New Hope PUD. The ingress/egress easement shall be recorded at the owner of the Shoppes at Santa Barbara PUD's expense prior to the issuance of the first residential or mixed -use site development plan or approval of plat. Prior to issuance of the first residential or mixed -use site development plan or plat, the developer will design a sidewalk connection from residential properties on the MU Tract to its eastern property line to align with the existing sidewalk along Piazza Ct within the New Hope PUD. Prior to the issuance of the first residential certificate of occupancy, the developer will construct said sidewalk connection. If the owner of the New Hope PUD provides an easement at no cost to the developer, the developer at its expense will also construct the sidewalk from the eastern property line of the Shoppes at Santa Barbara PUD to the existing sidewalk along Piazza Ct in the New Hope PUD. 5.4 WATER MANAGEMENT A. A 40 ft wide Drainage Easement (DE) shall be provided along the entire east side of the parcel. This DE will convey flows from the county -owned property to the north to the Davis Blvd swale. Along the east side of the DE the top of the berm and return to grade slope shall contain a Words struek through are deleted, words underlined are added. The Shoppes at Santa Barbara PUDA (PL20190002356) September 2, 2021 Page 15 of 23 Q 0 a �a L E L CU m M yr M M d 0. a 0 CO m u EI Q Packet Pg. 1884 17.C.b 5 ft wide hedge planting area to act as a landscape buffer. Refer to Exhibit C, Drainage Easement. The DE (including the swale and hedge) shall be maintained by the Shoppes at Santa Barbara Property Owners Association. The DE will be provided to Collier County at no cost to County, free and clear of all liens and encumbrances at time of SDP or Plat approval for the residential option. MAI SECTION VI DEVIATIONS FROM THE LDC DEVIATION 1: Relief from LDC Section 4.05.04 G., "Spaces required. Table 17. Parking Space Requirements." Multi -family Dwellings, which requires where small-scale recreation facilities are accessory to a single-family or multifamily_ project and intended only for the residents of that project, exclusive of golf courses/clubhouses, the recreation facilities may be computed at 50 percent of normal requirements where the majori , of the dwelling units are not within 300 feet of the recreation facilities and at 25 percent of normal requirements where the majority of the dwelling units are within 300 feet of the recreation facilities. However, any recreation facility shall have a minimum of 2 spaces exclusive of parking spaces for dwelling units, to instead allow parking for all amenities to be calculated at 1 space per 500 square feet of enclosed clubhouse facilities. DEVIATION 2: Relief from LDC Section 4.06.02 C., "Table 2.4 Table of Buffer Requirements by Land Use Classifications", which requires each development We to provide a 15 foot wide We `B' buffer where residential and commercial are adjacent to each other to instead allow a shared 15-foot wide We `B' landscape buffer between commercial and residential tracts with each pronertv contributing 7.5 feet. DEVIATION 3: Relief from LDC Section 4.06.02 C.. "Table 2.4 Table of Buffer Reauirements by Land Use Classifications", which requires a 10 foot wide type `A' landscape buffer if developed with multi -family residential along the eastern PUD boundary to instead allow a 5 foot wide landscape buffer with a single row hedge planted on the slope of the berm along the eastern PUD boundary south of the New Hope Ministries PUD preserve area. The singlehedge shall be planted at 5 feet height and 4 foot on center and shall be a minimum of 6 feet in height and 80% opaque within one year. DEVIATION 4: Relief from LDC Section 4.06.05 J.. "Slone Table 4.06.05 J. and Slone Cross Section 4.06.05 J.", which requires a slope ratio no steeper than 2:1 to be treated with Rip -rap or other forms of erosion and scour protection to instead allow a slope ratio of 2:1 to be treated with ground cover or grass in lieu of rip -rap for stabilization for the drainage swale along the east property line which drains offsite flow from the north. Words struek through are deleted, words underlined are added. The Shoppes at Santa Barbara PUDA (PL20190002356) September 2, 2021 Page 16 of 23 Q 0 a �a E L CU m 0 c M M 0 a� 0. a 0 M co m u r Q Packet Pg. 1885 17.C.b DEVIATION 5: Relief from LDC Section 6.05.01 K. "Outfall ditches and open channels", which requires unless otherwise approved by the County Manager or designee pursuant to section 10.02.04 of the LDC, side slopes no steeper than four to one will be allowed. Protection against scour and erosion will be provided as required by the County Manager or designee to instead allow a side slope of 2:1 with ground cover or ,grass for stabilization for the drainage swale along the east property line which drains offsite flow from the north. DEVIATION 6: Relief from LDC Section 4.06.02 C.. "Table 2.4 Table of Buffer Reauirements by Land Use Classifications", which requires landscape buffering and screening standards within any planned unit development shall conform to the minimum buffering and screening standards of the zoning district to which it most closely resembles which would require a 10 foot wide type "A" landscape buffer between mixed use developments, to instead allow no buffer along the northern PUD boundary. Words struek through are deleted, words underlined are added. The Shoppes at Santa Barbara PUDA (PL20190002356) September 2, 2021 Page 17 of 23 Packet Pg. 1886 17.C.b . . . . .. . MI . .. . . .. .. .11 \ 4-5 Words struek through are deleted; words underlined are added. The Shoppes at Santa Barbara PUDA (PL20190002356) September Z 2021 Page 18 of 23 Q 0 a �a L E L CU m M M Cn d O t CO t u Q Packet Pg. 1887 17.C.b b. Upon elefineetien to the e develeper-f f 4-6 Words struek through are deleted; words underlined are added. The Shoppes at Santa Barbara PUDA (PL20190002356) September Z 2021 Page 19 of 23 Q 0 a �a L E L CO m M M Cn N d O t CO O t H O O O N N O O O O C� C C L u Q Packet Pg. 1888 17.C.b •AIM f make eefmeetiea wi� the s eff site water- and/or- sewer- f , 4-7 Words struek through are deleted; words underlined are added. The Shoppes at Santa Barbara PUDA (PL20190002356) September Z 2021 Page 20 of 23 Q 0 D a �a L E L CU m M M Cn d O t CO t u Q Packet Pg. 1889 17.C.b The iffter-im basis by the by the developer e. eustemer-s served on an t4ilit-y system eeastFueted - the te the Ceui#y's f6eilifies the developer-, his of pr-ejeet eff site water- a-ad/er- sewer- by the ipAer-im the Couffty for- the u4ilities system these The developer- a -ad shall fiet eempete with the Gouffty setwiee of detailed ifFveR4E)r-y eustemef:s. shall alse pf:E)vide with a E)-f ------------ M. ....�.i.. �....�.. � � .ram.. � U Words struek through are deleted; words underlined are added. The Shoppes at Santa Barbara PUDA (PL20190002356) September 2, 2021 Page 21 of 23 Q 0 D a �a L E L CU CO M M Cn d O t CO t u Q Packet Pg. 1890 17.C.b M Words struek through are deleted; words underlined are added. The Shoppes at Santa Barbara PUDA (PL20190002356) September Z 2021 Page 22 of 23 Q 0 D a �a L E L CU CO M M Cn d O t CO t u Q Packet Pg. 1891 17.C.b ■ _ IML r�:e�s�ee*::ss�:Ee! :zse ..... ....... :�s��ser.�s�r�!�ser�ee�etsr . _ KIN Words struck threug4 are deleted; words underlined are added. The Shoppes at Santa Barbara PUDA (PL20190002356) September 2, 2021 Page 23 of 23 Packet Pg. 1892 -• .,-....,..-., a .� r.. �.., ........_... — - - r0000 I 4 I 1l�lllllllll I --I I__1- I I I00 bifl[1Jf111111gL- r-_ Cu �IhIfIlIlE11 i �lll�[1[IllIIWfLl1�' l W WW14L 1IEl I11IL1111�1WU[�llll� • �r-m� il MWN •1 WATER YANACENENT PLAN (AURENCE YUWNS r ..— � � ww.-.�` �K' R��FfK 04 . lr.6. ■�rl�n .. i Q00 G� CC C" 3 C7 17.C.b Q Q M1 Packet Pg. 1894 17 ETH:3LT C Y. &TA MEN T OF UN11'r?O CONTROL. 1� d IC is a Intent of t'.e 5hoopes of Santa Ba_ba_3 ?Un to establ and dev p a Planned Unit Development on 13.1 acres. no project Lccated at the intersection o! Santa aa.rbarm and is HL•rd. Ta ubject lands are tinder unified c-wne=ship for th pu_-posa of taining PUD zoning an the subject aroae:-t_r. Development this planned unit aiLL occur i:t accordant ith 20 suhm:,tted arced Unit Development regulations and conditions the f aporeved with the rerarte petition a esezibed and agreed to we in the PUD document. r Y. _ F Laurent lLi.ns Coacrat andea and Equitable Dw-ne r r 4 IOCK 036 w! 209 Q 0 a m L Co to C C y d Q Q 0 t a> t H a) 0 0 N N 00 O m O d V C f0 C O Q Q E V r Q Packet Pg. 1895 I 17.C.b I II� 111 IN IN IN IN IN N IN IN IM IN N SANTA BARBARA BLVD. ROW — (OR BOOK 1483 PAGE 1606) 111 111 111 111 111 111 111 BEMBRIDGE EMS COMPLEX RPUD AND CFPUD ACCESS EASEMENT, WATER MANAGEMENT AND GNFRD STATION #75 11 60' CROSS EASEMENT � (OR 1483, PG 1619) — — — J 0 100' 200' SCALE: 1" = 200' WHEN PLOTTED @ 8.5" X It - POTENTIAL VEHICULAR AND/OR PEDESTRIAN 20' WIDE TYPE 'D' INTERCONNECTION (SEE LANDSCAPE BUFFER l I PUD SECTION 5.3, ITEM I.) NEW HOPE MPUD NO BUFFER REQUIRED ADJACENT TO NEW - PRESERVE HOPE MPUD PRESERVE MIXED USE 60' DRAINAGE EASEMENT (OR 1483, PG 1619) TO BE VACATED OR MODIFIED ill � 'II NEW HOPE MPUD it MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL it 1 PROPOSED 40' DRAINAGE EASEMENT 20' WIDE TYPE 'D' JLANDSCAPE BUFFER (SEE NOTE #2) - PROJECT BOUNDARY I Ill C Il l L Ill DAVIS BLVD. ROW (OR BOOK 1483 PAGE 1606) DAVIS BOULEVARD 20' WIDE TYPE D'LANDSCAPE BUFFER (SEE NOTE #2) LEGEND: B (MU) MIXED USE - COMMERCIAL AND/OR RESIDENTIAL (C) COMMERCIAL # DEVIATION (SEE NOTE SHEET) THE SHOPPES AT SANTA BARBARA MPUD x 0 nrady NlnOr and ;ate.9, P.A OH CODE: n' r a dyM i n o r 3B00 800 Va Ilel Rev Snnita Springs, Florida 34134 EXHIBIT A DazE: Civil Engineers . Land Surveyors Planners . Landscape Architects MASTER PLAN FILE x nEY ° Cert. of Auth. EB 0005151 Cert. of Auth. LB 0005151 Business LC 26000266 REVISED: 08/24/2021 Bonita Springs: 239.947.1144 WWW. GFddYMIBOT. com Fort Myers: 239.690.4380 Packet rlJ.. 1896 1 I 17.C.b I SITE SUMMARY TOTAL SITE AREA: 18.1± ACRE COUNTY ROW 2.0± ACRES COMMERCIAL (C) 1.0± ACRES MIXED USE (MU) 15.1± ACRES COMMERCIAL: MAXIMUM 150,000 S.F. RESIDENTIAL: MAXIMUM 242 DWELLING UNITS OPEN SPACE: REQUIRED: 30% PROVIDED: 30% PRFCFR\/F- REQUIRED: 0± ACRES PROVIDED: 0± ACRES DEVIATIONS (SEE EXHIBIT E) R RELIEF FROM LDC SECTION 4.05.04.G, "SPACES REQUIRED. TABLE 17. PARKING SPACE REQUIREMENTS." 0 RELIEF FROM LDC SECTION 4.06.02, "TABLE 2.4 TABLE OF BUFFER REQUIREMENTS BY LAND USE CLASSIFICATIONS" 3 RELIEF FROM LDC SECTION 4.06.02 C., "TABLE 2.4 TABLE OF BUFFER REQUIREMENTS BY LAND USE CLASSIFICATIONS" ® RELIEF FROM LDC SECTION 4.06.05 J., "SLOPE TABLE 4.06.05 J. AND SLOPE CROSS SECTION 4.06.05 J." 5 RELIEF FROM LDC SECTION 6.05.01.K "OUTFALL DITCHES AND OPEN CHANNELS' RELIEF FROM LDC SECTION 4.06.02 C., "TABLE 2.4 TABLE OF BUFFER REQUIREMENTS BY LAND USE CLASSIFICATIONS" NnTFC a 0 a m L m R c r to (D Q Q O t N m 0 0 fV 00 0 a) 0 m U c c =a O a r a c 1v E U a 1. THIS PLAN IS CONCEPTUAL IN NATURE AND IS SUBJECT TO MINOR MODIFICATION DUE TO AGENCY PERMITTING REQUIREMENTS. 2. IF A FACILITY WITH FUEL PUMPS IS PROPOSED, LANDSCAPE BUFFERS ADJACENT TO SANTA BARBARA BOULEVARD AND DAVIS BOULEVARD WILL BE CONSISTENT WITH LDC SECTION 5.05.05 THE SHOPPES AT SANTA BARBARA MPUD 1 Il. pnudI bIIIIUf dlld A55UCI lM12fi. IV\- l0E CODE: ra dyMi n o r 3800 Vfa nrl Rey 11,iow Swings. Florida 34134 EXHIBIT B DATE:oE Civil Engineers MASTER PLAN NOTES FEBD°"D T°T' Land Surveyors Planners Landscape Architects 1- NAME: C,,L.,f Auth. H00006161 CerL.of A,Lh. 100006161 Business LC 26000266 REVISE 07/16/2021 Bonita Springs: 239.947A 144 wn rv. GrddyAf1nor. Dom Fort Myers: 239.690.4380 Packet Pg. 1897 77.C.b I ii II I 2' CAR Q O � ifi' OVERHANG PROPERTY BOUNDARY II 'D' CURB I, I � I A II II II I 40' I I , PROPERTY BOUNDARY I ao 10' MNTC 5' PARKING SPACE PATH 8' 12' 10.0' PLANTING AREA T.O.C. EL: 13.0 2.0' TOP OF BERM 6.0' EL: 12.0 2.0 B.O.C. EL: 12.5 EL: 11.0 PROP. HEDGE ROW PARKING LOT PAVEMENT -- _ _ 1 EL 8.0 — 1 SEX. EL: 11.0 "D" CURB PROP. GRADE E%. GRADE MATCH EX. EL: 10.0 EL: 12.5 II SECTION A EXHIBIT C - DRAINAGE EASEMENT SCALE: N.T.S. SCALE: 1— 10' Packet Pg. 1898 17.C.d CO eY County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliercountyfl.gov 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Hybrid Virtual Quasi -Judicial Public Hearing Waiver For Petition Number(s): Emergency/Executive Order 2020-04 Hearing of the Collier County Planning Commission and Board of County Commissioners PL20200002233 Regarding the above subject petition number(s), Altman Development Company, LLC (Name of Applicant) elects to proceed during the declared emergency with hybrid virtual public hearings of the Collier County Planning Commission and Board of County Commissioners, and waives the right to contest any procedural irregularity due to the hybrid virtual nature of the public hearing. Name: Joel L. Altman as CEO/Chairman Signature*: ® Appli nt ❑ Legal Counsel to Applicant Date: —qh �4/ * This form must be signed by either the Applicant (if the applicant is a corporate entity, this must be an officer of the corporate entity) or the legal counsel to the Applicant. Packet Pg. 1899 17.C.e (CHAPTER 8, COLLIER COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE FOR LAND DEVELOPMENT) A zoning sign(s) must be posted by the petitioner or the petitioner's agent on the parcel for a minimum of fifteen (15) calendar days in advance of the first public hearing and said sign(s) must be maintained by the petitioner or the petitioner's agent through the Board of County Commissioners Hearing. Below are general guidelines for signs, however these guidelines should not be construed to supersede any requirement of the LDC. For specific sign requirements, please refer to the Administrative Code, Chapter 8 E. The sign(s) must be erected in full view of the public, not more than five (5) feet from the nearest street right-of-way or easement. The sign(s) must be securely affixed by nails, staples, or other means to a wood frame or to a wood panel and then fastened securely to a post, or other structure. The sign may not be affixed to a tree or other foliage. The petitioner or the petitioner's agent must maintain the sign(s) in place, and readable condition until the requested action has been heard and a final decision rendered. If the sign(s) is destroyed, lost, or rendered unreadable, the petitioner or the petitioner's agent must replace the sign(s) NOTE: AFTER THE SIGN HAS BEEN POSTED, THIS AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE SHOULD BE RETURNED NO LATER THAN TEN (10) WORKING DAYS BEFORE THE FIRST HEARING DATE TO THE ASSIGNED PLANNER. . . _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER BEFORE THE UNDERSIGNED AUTHORITY, PERSONALLY APPEARED SHARON UMPENHOUR WHO ON OATH SAYS THAT HE/SHE HAS POSTED PROPER NOTICE AS REQUIRED BY SECTION 10.03.00 OF THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE ON THE PARCEL COVERED IN PETITION NUMBER(S) The Sh nes t Santa Barbara-PL20200002233. �4 lh'/J,t i (j//[/ 3800 Via Del Rey SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT OR AGENT STREET OR P.O. BOX Sharon Umpenhour as Senior Planning Technician for Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. NAME (TYPED OR PRINTED) STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF Lee Bonita Springs, Florida 34110 CITY, STATE ZIP The foregoing instrument was sworn to and subscribed before me this September 20, 2021, by Sharon Umpenhour as Senior Planning Technician for Q. Grady. Minor & Associates, P.A., personally known to me and who d4&did not take an oath. `• "4+t CARIN J. DWYER MY COMMISSION # GO 9a2367 EXPIRES: May 14, 2024 t andad Thru N Mary public UrKie a � ra My Commission Expires: (Stamp with serial number) Rev. 3/4/2015 4 Signature of Notar ublic Carin J. Dwyer Printed Name of Notary Public Packet Pg. 1900 17.C.e PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE THE SHOPPES AT SANTA BARBARA PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT PETITION NO. PL20200002233 Cr-PC: SEPTEMBER 2, 2021 - 9:00 a.m. BCC: OCTOBER 26, 2021 - 9:00 a.m. COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER, 3RD FLOOR,V 3299 EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL, NAPLES, FL 34112 LAURA DEJOHN, AICP: 239-252-5587.- ,PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE 's THE SHOPPES AT SANTA BARBARA PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT PETITION NO. PL20200002233 AB" CCPC: SEPTEMBER 2, 2021 - 9:00 a.m.Youl BCC: OCTOBER 26, 2021 - 9:00 a.m. — COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER, 3RD FLOOR 3299 EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL, NAPLES, FL 34112 LAURA DEJOHN, AICP: 239-252-5587 Packet Pg. 1901 _J_ NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICF OF INTENT TO CONSIDER A ORDINANCE Notice is hereby. given that a public hearing will be held by the Collier County Board of County Commissioners on October 26, 2021, in the Board of County Commissioners Meeting Room, Third Floor, Collier Government Center, 3299 East Tamiami Trail, Naples, FL, to consider the enactment of a County Ordinance. The meeting will commence at 9:00 A.M. The title of the proposed Ordinance is as follows: AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 89-62, AS AMENDED, THE SHOPPES AT SANTA BARBARA PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT BY ADDING DWELLING UNITS AS A PERMITTED USE; BY AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 2OD4-41, AS AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, WHICH ESTABLISHED THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BY AMENDING THE APPROPRIATE ZONING ATLAS MAP OR MAPS BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY FROM A COMMERCIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (CPUD) ZONING DISTRICT TO A MIXED -USE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (MPUD) ZONING DISTRICT FOR THE PROJECT TO BE KNOWN AS THE SHOPPES AT SANTA BARBARA MPUD, BY ALLOWING UP TO, WITH A MIX TO BE DETERMINED BY MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE TRAFFIC GENERATION, 150,0110 SQUARE FEET OF COMMERCIAL USES AND 242 DWELLING UNITS IN ADDITION TO THE PREVIOUSLY APPROVED COMMERCIAL USES; BY ADDING DEVIATIONS, BY REVISING DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS AND AMENDING THE MASTER PLAN. THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED AT THE NORTHEAST QUADRANT OF SANTA BARBARA AND DAVIS BOULEVARDS, IN SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, CONSISTING OF 18.1t ACRES; AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. [PL20200002233] Pro ect vo Location Davis BLVD ®.. en CL } A copy of the proposed Ordinance is on file with the Clerk to the Board and is available for Inspection. All Interested parties are invited to attend and be heard. NOTE: All persons wishing to speak on any agenda item must register with the County manager prior to presentation of file agenda item to be addressed. Individual speakers will be limited to 3 minutes on any item. The selection of any individual to speak on behalf of an organization or group is encouraged. If recognized by the Chairman, a spokesperson for a group or organization may be allotted 10 minutes to speak on an item. Persons wishing o have written or graphic materials included in the Board agenda packets must submit said material a minimum of 3 weeks prior to the respective public hearing. In any case, written materials intended to be considered, by the Board shall be submitted to the appropriate County star, a minimum of seven days prior to the public hearing. All materials used in presentations before the Board will become a permanent part of the record. As part of an ongoing initiative to promote social distancing during the COVID-19 pandemic, the public will have the opportunity to provide public comments remotely, as well as in person, during this proceeding. Individuals who would like to participate remotely, should register any time after the agenda is posted on the County website which is 6 days before the meeting through the link provided on the front page of the County website at www.colliercDunW.gov. Individuals who register will receive an email in advance of the public hearingdetailing how they can participate remotely in this meeting. For additional information about the meeting, please call Geoffrey. Willig at 252-8369 or email to Geoffrey.WlllI @colliercounw, gov. Any person who decides to appeal any decision of the Board will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto and therefore, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is based. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Division, located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 101, Naples, FL 34112-5356, (239) 252-8380, at least two days prior to the meeting. Assisted listening devices for the hearing impaired are available in the Board of County Commissioners Office_ BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA PENNY TAYLOR, CHAIRMAN § CRYSTAL K. KINZEL, CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT 6 COMPTROLLER By: Teresa Cannon, z Deputy Clerk (SEAL) M• m v z m 0 'n 0 m m M IJ �O N Z >r fA Z M A M 'a G Q Packet Pg. 1902 The Shoppes at Santa Barbara MPUD (PL20200002233) Application and Supporting Documents Sept. 2,, 2021 CCPC Hearing wGradyMinor Civil Engineers • Land Surveyors • Planners • Landscape Architects Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, FL 34134 • 239-947-1144 • engineering@gradyminor.com • www.gradyminor.com GradyMinor Civil Engineers • Land Surveyors • Planners • Landscape Architects March 18, 2021 Mr. Timothy Finn, AICP Collier County Growth Management Department Zoning Division - Zoning Services Section 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 RE: Collier County Application for Public Hearing, The Shoppes at Santa Barbara PUD Amendment (PL20200002233), Submittal 1 Dear Mr. Finn: A Collier County application for Public Hearing for a Planned Unit Development (PUD) Amendment for properties located at the northeast quadrant of Santa Barbara Boulevard and Davis Boulevard is being filed electronically for review. This application proposes to amend the PUD to allow the addition of up to a maximum of 242 multi -family residential dwelling units. Documents filed with submittal 1 include the following: 1. Cover Letter 2. Application for a Public Hearing for PUD Amendment 3. Evaluation Criteria 4. Pre -application meeting notes 5. Affidavit of Authorization 6. Property Ownership Disclosure Form 7. Covenant of Unified Control 8. Addressing Checklist 9. Warranty Deed(s) 10. Aerial Location Map 11. Traffic Impact Study 12. School Impact Analysis 13. Deviation Justification 14. Original PUD documents Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. Ph. 239-947-1144 Fax. 239-947-0375 3800 Via Del Rey EB 0005151 LB 0005151 LC 26000266 Bonita Springs, FL 34134 www.gradyminor.com Mr. Timothy Finn, AICP RE: Collier County Application for Public Hearing, The Shoppes at Santa Barbara PUD Amendment (PL20200002233), Submittal 1 March 18, 2021 Page 2 of 2 15. Revised PUD document Please feel free to contact Rich Yovanovich at 435-3535 or me should you have any questions. Sincerely, <-D- �p D. Wayne Arnold, AICP Altman Development Company Richard D. Yovanovich GradyMinor File (ADBZSDP) CoAr County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliercounty.gov 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Application for a Public Hearing for PUD Rezone, Amendment to PUD of PUD to PUD Rezone PETITION NO PROJECT NAME To be completed by staff DATE PROCESSED ❑ PUD Rezone (PUDZ): LDC subsection 10.02.13 A.-F., Ch. 3 G. 1 of the Administrative Code ❑■ Amendment to PUD (PUDA): LDC subsection 10.02.13 E. and Ch. 3 G. 2 of the Administrative Code ❑ PUD to PUD Rezone (PUDR): LDC subsection 10.02.13 A.-F. APPLICANT CONTACT INFORMATION Name of Property Owner(s): Strohl Family, LLC Name of Applicant if different than owner: Altman Development Company, LLC Address: 1515 S. Federal Highway, Suite 300 City: Boca Raton State: FL ZIP: 33432 Telephone: 561.314.1462 Cell: E-Mail Address: glopez@altmancos.com Fax: Name of Agent: D. Wayne Arnold, AICP / Richard D. Yovanovich, Esq. Firm: Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A Address: 3800 Via Del Rey Telephone: 239-947-1144 / 239-435-3535 Cell: / Coleman, Yovanovich & Koester, P.A. City: Bonita Springs state: FL ZIP: 34134 Fax: E-Mail Address: warnold@gradyminor.com / rovanovich@cyklaw.com Be aware that Collier County has lobbyist regulations. Guide yourself accordingly and ensure that you are in compliance with these regulations. March 4, 2020 Page 1 of 11 CoAr County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliercounty.gov 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 REZONE REQUEST This application is requesting a rezone from: commercial Planned unit Development Zoning district(s) to the Mixed Use Planned Unit Development zoning district(s). Present Use of the Property. Partially developed commercial Proposed Use (or range of uses) of the property: Commercial and Residential Original PUD Name: The Shoppes at Santa Barbara Ordinance No.: 89-062 PROPERTY INFORMATION On a separate sheet attached to the application, provide a detailed legal description of the property covered by the application: • If the request involves changes to more than one zoning district, the applicant shall include a separate legal description for property involved in each district; • The applicant shall submit 4 copies of a recent survey (completed within the last six months, maximum 1" to 400' scale), if required to do so at the pre -application meeting; and • The applicant is responsible for supplying the correct legal description. If questions arise concerning the legal description, an engineer's certification or sealed survey may be required. Section/Township/Range: 1___ 50 26 Lot: N.A- Block: N.A. Subdivision: N.A. Metes & Bounds Description: Plat Book: N.A. Page #: N.A. Property I.D. Number: 00400244107 Size of Property: 1,261+/- ft. x 555+/- ft. = 657,756+/- Total Sq. Ft. Acres: 15.1+/- Address/ General Location of Subject Property: Northeast quadrant of Santa Barbara Blvd and Davis Blvd PUD District (refer to LDC subsection 2.03.06 Q ❑■ Commercial ❑ Residential ❑ Community Facilities ❑ Mixed Use ❑ Other: ❑ Industrial March 4, 2020 Page 2 of 11 CoAr County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliercounty.gov 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 ADJACENT ZONING AND LAND USE Zoning Land Use N BEMBRIDGE EMS Complex RPUD and CFPUD undeveloped residential, elementary school and Greater Naples Fire Rescue -Station #75 S Davis Blvd ROW and Taormina Reserve MPUD ROW and Undeveloped E New Hope MPUD Residential W Santa Barbara ROW and Berkshire Lakes DRI/PUD Commercial If the owner of the subject property owns contiguous property please provide a detailed legal description of the entire contiguous property on a separate sheet attached to the application. Section/Township/Range: N.A. / N.A. / N.A. Lot: N.A. Block: N.A. Subdivision: N.A. Plat Book: N.A Page #: N.A. Property I.D. Number: N.A. Metes & Bounds Description: N.A. ASSOCIATIONS Required: List all registered Home Owner Association(s) that could be affected by this petition. Provide additional sheets if necessary. Information can be found on the Board of County Commissioner's website at http://www.colliergov.net/]ndex.aspx?page=774. Name of Homeowner Association: Briar Landing at the Enclave Condominium Association, Inc. Mailing Address: 1385 Wildwood Lakes Blvd City: Naples State: FL Zip: 34104 Name of Homeowner Association: Enclave at Naples Condominium Association, Inc. Mailing Address: 1295 Wildwood Lakes Blvd City: Naples State: FL Name of Homeowner Association: Firano at Naples Homeowners Association, Inc. Mailing Address: 2335 Tamiami Trail N. Suite 402 City: Naples State: FL Name of Homeowner Association: Countryside Master Association, Inc. Mailing Address: 600 Countryside Drive City: Naples State: FL Name of Homeowner Association: Mailing Address: March 4, 2020 City: State: Zip: 34104 ZIP: 34103 Zip: 34104 ZIP: Page 3 of 11 Co*er Count y COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliercounty.gov EVALUATION CRITERIA 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Pursuant to LDC subsections 10.02.13 B, 10.02.08 F and Chapter 3 G. of the Administrative Code, staff's analysis and recommendation to the Planning Commission, and the Planning Commission's recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners shall be based upon consideration of the applicable criteria. On a separate sheet attached to the application, provide a narrative statement describing the rezone request with specific reference to the criteria below. Include any backup materials and documentation in support of the request. a. The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer, water, and other utilities. b. Adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of any proposed agreements, contract, or other instruments, or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense. Findings and recommendations of this type shall be made only after consultation with the county attorney. C. Conformity of the proposed PUD with the goals, objectives and policies of the Growth Management Plan. (This is to include identifying what Sub -district, policy or other provision allows the requested uses/density, and fully explaining/addressing all criteria or conditions of that Sub -district, policy or other provision.) d. The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening requirements. e. The adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the development. f. The timing or sequence of development for the purpose of assuring the adequacy of available improvements and facilities, both public and private. g. The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion. h. Conformity with PUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the particular case, based on determination that such modifications of justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations. Deed Restrictions: The County is legally precluded from enforcing deed restrictions; however, many communities have adopted such restrictions. You may wish to contact the civic or property owners association in the area for which this use is being requested in order to ascertain whether or not the request is affected by existing deed restrictions. March 4, 2020 Page 4 of 11 CoAr County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliercounty.gov 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Previous land use petitions on the subject property: To your knowledge, has a public hearing been held on this property within the last year? If so, what was the nature of that hearing? N.A. Official Interpretations or Zoning Verifications: To your knowledge, has there been an official interpretation or zoning verification rendered on this property within the last year? ❑ Yes ❑■ No if so please provide copies. PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIREMENTS This land use petition requires a Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM), pursuant to Chapter 3 E. of the Administrative Code and LDC section 10.03.06. Following the NIM, the applicant will submit a written summary and any commitments that have been made at the meeting. Refer to Chapter 8 B. of the Administrative Code for the NIM procedural requirements. Chapter 8 of the Administrative Code requires that the applicant must remove their public hearing advertising sign(s) after final action is taken by the Board of County Commissioners. Based on the Board's final action on this item, please remove all public hearing advertising sign(s) immediately. RECORDING OF DEVELOPER COMMITMENTS Within 30 days of adoption of the Ordinance, the owner or developer (specify name) at their expense shall record in the Public Records of Collier County a Memorandum of Understanding of Developer Commitments or Notice of Developer Commitments that contains the legal description of the property that is the subject of the land use petition and contains each and every commitment of the owner or developer specified in the Ordinance. The Memorandum or Notice shall be in form acceptable to the County and shall comply with the recording requirements of Chapter 695, FS. A recorded copy of the Memorandum or Notice shall be provided to the Collier County Planned Unit Development Monitoring staff within 15 days of recording of said Memorandum or Notice. LDC subsection 10.02.08 D This application will be considered "open" when the determination of "sufficiency" has been made and the application is assigned a petition processing number. The application will be considered "closed" when the petitioner withdraws the application through written notice or ceases to supply necessary information to continue processing or otherwise actively pursue the rezoning, amendment or change, for a period of 6 months. An application deemed "closed" will not receive further processing and an application "closed" through inactivity shall be deemed withdrawn. An application deemed "closed" may be re -opened by submission of a new application, repayment of all application fees and the grant of a determination of "sufficiency". Further review of the request will be subject to the then current code. March 4, 2020 Page 5 of 11 CoAr County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliercounty.gov 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 STATEMENT OF UTILITY PROVISIONS FOR PUD REZONE REQUEST APPLICANT CONTACT INFORMATION Name of Applicant(s): Altman Development Company Address: 1515 S. Federal Highway, Suite 300 City: Boca Raton State: FL Telephone:561.314.1462 Cell: Fax: E-Mail Address: glopez@altmancos.com Address of Subject Property (If available): 4670 Santa Barbara Blvd city: Naples State: ZIP:34104 ROPERTY INFORMATION Section/Township/Range: 4 50 26 Lot: N.A. Block: N.A. Subdivision: N.A. Metes & Bounds Description: Plat Book: N.A. Page #: N.A. Property I.D. Number: 00400244107 ZIP: 33432 TYPE OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL TO BE PROVIDED Check applicable system: a. County Utility System 0 b. City Utility System ❑ C. Franchised Utility System ❑ Provide Name: d. Package Treatment Plant ❑ (GPD Capacity): e. Septic System ❑ I TYPE OF WATER SERVICE TO BE PROVIDED I Check applicable system: a. County Utility System x❑ b. City Utility System ❑ C. Franchised Utility System ❑ Provide Name: d. Private System (Well) ❑ Maximum development potential would be 242 MFUs plus 114,545 SF of retail/office [(550-130)/550 x 150,000] Total Population to be Served: Peak and Average Daily Demands: A. Water -Peak: 130957 gpd Average Daily: 100736 gpd B. Sewer -Peak: 107933 gpd Average Daily: 71955 gpd If proposing to be connected to Collier County Regional Water System, please provide the date service is expected to be required: 12/2022 March 4, 2020 Page 6 of 11 Co*er Count y COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliercounty.gov 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Narrative statement: Provide a brief and concise narrative statement and schematic drawing of sewage treatment process to be used as well as a specific statement regarding the method of affluent and sludge disposal. If percolation ponds are to be used, then percolation data and soil involved shall be provided from tests prepared and certified by a professional engineer. N.A. Collier County Utility Dedication Statement: If the project is located within the service boundaries of Collier County's utility service system, a notarized statement shall be provided agreeing to dedicate the water distribution and sewage collection facilities within the project area to the Collier County Utilities. This shall occur upon completion of the construction of these facilities in accordance with all applicable County ordinances in effect at that time. This statement shall also include an agreement that the applicable system development charges and connection fees will be paid to the County Utilities Division prior to the issuance of building permits by the County. If applicable, the statement shall contain an agreement to dedicate the appropriate utility easements for serving the water and sewer systems. Statement of Availability Capacity from other Providers: Unless waived or otherwise provided for at the pre -application meeting, if the project is to receive sewer or potable water services from any provider other than the County, a statement from that provider indicating adequate capacity to serve the project shall be provided. March 4, 2020 Page 7 of 11 Co*er Count y COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliercounty.gov (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 COVENANT OF UNIFIED CONTROL The undersigned do hereby swear or affirm that we are the fee simple titleholders and owners of record of property commonly known as The Shoppes at Santa Barbara PUD, Parcel No. 00400244107 4670 Santa Barbara Boulevard (Street address and City, State and Zip Code) and legally described in Exhibit attached hereto. The property described herein is the subject of an application for Mixed Use planned unit development (M PUD) zoning. We hereby designate Altman Development Company, LLc , legal representative thereof, as the legal representatives of the property and as such, these individuals are authorized to legally bind all owners of the property in the course of seeking the necessary approvals to develop. This authority includes, but is not limited to, the hiring and authorization of agents to assist in the preparation of applications, plans, surveys, and studies necessary to obtain zoning approval on the site. These representatives will remain the only entity to authorize development activity on the property until such time as a new or amended covenant of unified control is delivered to Collier County. The undersigned recognize the following and will be guided accordingly in the pursuit of development of the project: 1. The property will be developed and used in conformity with the approved master plan including all conditions placed on the development and all commitments agreed to by the applicant in connection with the planned unit development rezoning. 2. The legal representative identified herein is responsible for compliance with all terms, conditions, safeguards, and stipulations made at the time of approval of the master plan, even if the property is subsequently sold in whole or in part, unless and until a new or amended covenant of unified control is delivered to and recorded by Collier County. 3. A departure from the provisions of the approved plans or a failure to comply with any requirements, conditions, or safeguards provided for in the planned unit development process will constitute a violation of the Land Development Code. 4. All terms and conditions of the planned unit development approval will be incorporated into covenants and restrictions which run with the land so as to provide notice to subsequent owners that all development activity within the planned unit development must be consistent with those terms and conditions. 5. So long as this covenant is in force, Collier County can, upon the discovery of noncompliance with the terms, safeguards, and conditions of the planned unit development, seek equitable relief as necessary to compel compliance. The County will not issue permits, certificates, or licenses to occupy or use any part of the planned unit development and the County may stop ongoing construction activity until the project is brought into compliance with all terms, conditions and safeguards of the planned unit development. Owner Myles L. Strohl as Manager of Strohl Family LLC Printed Name STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER Owner Printed Name The foregoing instrument was acknowleged before me by means of ❑physical presence or❑online notarization this day of , 20 21 by (printed name of owner or qualifier) Myles L. Strohl as Manager of Strohl Family LLc Such person(s) Notary Public must check applicable box: ❑Are personally known to me ❑Has produced a current drivers license ❑Has produced as identification. Notary Seal Notary Signature: March 4, 2020 Page 8 of 11 Co*er Count y COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliercounty.gov Final Submittal Requirement Checklist for: ❑ PUD Rezone- Ch. 3 G. 1 of the Administrative Code ■❑ Amendment to PUD- Ch. 3 G. 2 of the Administrative Code ❑ PUD to PUD Rezone- Ch. 3 G. 1 of the Administrative Code 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 The following Submittal Requirement checklist is to be utilized during the Pre -Application Meeting and at time of application submittal. At final submittal, the checklist is to be completed and submitted with an up-to-date application. Please provide the submittal items in the exact order listed below, with cover sheets attached to each section. Incomplete submittals will not be accepted. A Model PUD Document is available online at http://www.colliercountyfl.gov/Home/ShowDocument?id=76983. REQUIREMENTS COPIES REQUIRED NOT REQUIRED Cover Letter with Narrative Statement including a detailed description of why amendment is necessary 1 0 ❑ Completed Application with required attachments (download latest version) 1 Pre -application meeting notes 1 ❑ ❑ Affidavit of Authorization, signed and notarized 1 Property Ownership Disclosure Form 1 Notarized and completed Covenant of Unified Control 1 Completed Addressing Checklist 1 Warranty Deed(s) 1 x❑ ❑ List Identifying Owner and all parties of corporation 1 ❑ ❑ Signed and sealed Boundary Survey 1 ❑ 0 Architectural Rendering of proposed structures 1 ❑ ❑ Current Aerial Photographs (available from Property Appraiser) with project boundary and, if vegetated, FLUCFCS Codes with legend included on aerial. 1 ❑ ❑ Statement of Utility Provisions 1 0 ❑ Environmental Data Requirements pursuant to LDC section 3.08.00 1 ❑ ❑ Environmental Data Requirements collated into a single Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) packet at time of public hearings. Coordinate with project planner at time of public hearings. ❑ ❑ 0 Listed or Protected Species survey, less than 12 months old. Include copies of previous surveys. 1 ❑ ❑ Traffic Impact Study 1 ❑ ❑ Historical Survey 1 ❑ ❑ School Impact Analysis Application, if applicable 1 0 ❑ Electronic copy of all required documents 1 ❑ ❑ Completed Exhibits A-F (see below for additional information)' ❑ ❑ 0 List of requested deviations from the LDC with justification for each (this document is separate from Exhibit E) ❑ 0 ❑ Checklist continues on next page March 4, 2020 Page 9 of 11 COAT County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliercounty.gov 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Revised Conceptual Master Site Plan 24" x 36"and One 8 %" x 11" copy ❑ 0 ❑ Original PUD document/ordinance, and Master Plan 24" x 36" — Only if Amending the PUD ❑ 0 ❑ Revised PUD document with changes crossed thru & underlined 1 0 ❑ Copy of Official Interpretation and/or Zoning Verification 1 ❑ 0 *If located in Immokalee or seeking affordable housing, include an additional set of each submittal requirement 'The following exhibits are to be completed on a separate document and attached to the application packet: Exhibit A: List of Permitted Uses Exhibit B: Development Standards Exhibit C: Master Plan- See Chapter 3 E. 1. of the Administrative Code Exhibit D: Legal Description Exhibit E: List of Requested LDC Deviations and justification for each Exhibit F: List of Development Commitments If located in RFMU (Rural Fringe Mixed Use) Receiving Land Areas Pursuant to LDC subsection 2.03.08.A.2.a.2.(b.)i.c., the applicant must contact the Florida Forest Service at 239- 690-3500 for information regarding "Wildfire Mitigation & Prevention Plan." PLANNERS — INDICATE IF THE PETITION NEEDS TO BE ROUTED TO THE FOLLOWING REVIEWERS: El School District (Residential Components): Amy Lockheart El conservancy of SWFL: Nichole Johnson ❑ Utilities Engineering: Eric Fey ❑ Parks and Recreation: Barry Williams (Director) ❑ Emergency Management: Dan Summers ❑ Immokalee Water/Sewer District: ❑ City of Naples: Robin Singer, Planning Director ❑ Other: ❑ I City of Naples Utilities ❑ Other: ASSOCIATED FEES FOR APPLICATION Pre -Application Meeting: $500.00 PUD Rezone: $10,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre PUD to PUD Rezone: $8,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre PUD Amendment: $6,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre Comprehensive Planning Consistency Review: $2,250.00 Environmental Data Requirements -EIS Packet (submittal determined at pre -application meeting): $2,500.00 Listed or Protected Species Review (when an EIS is not required): $1,000.00 Transportation Review Fees: o Methodology Review: $500.00 *Additional fees to be determined at Methodology Meeting. o Minor Study Review: $750.00 o Major Study Review $1,500.00 March 4, 2020 Page 10 of 11 Co*er County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliercounty.gov Legal Advertising Fees: o CCPC: $1,125.00 o BCC: $500.00 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 School Concurrency Fee, if applicable: o Mitigation Fees, if application, to be determined by the School District in coordination with the County Fire Code Plans Review Fees are not listed, but are collected at the time of application submission and those fees are set forth by the Authority having jurisdiction. The Land Development Code requires Neighborhood Notification mailers for Applications headed to hearing, and this fee is collected prior to hearing. All checks payable to: Board of County Commissioners. As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is included in this submittal package. I understand that failure to include all necessary submittal information may result in the delay of processing this petition. *Additional fee for the 5t' and subsequent re -submittal will be accessed at 20% of the original fee. May 14, 2021 CJ Signature of Petitioner or Agent Date D. Wayne Arnold, AICP Printed named of signing party March 4, 2020 Page 11 of 11 The Shoppes at Santa Barbara MPUD (PL20200002233) Evaluation Criteria Pursuant to LDC subsections 10.02.13 B, 10.02.08 F and Chapter 3 G. of the Administrative Code, staff's analysis and recommendation to the Planning Commission, and the Planning Commission's recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners shall be based upon consideration of the applicable criteria. Provide a narrative statement describing the rezone request with specific reference to the criteria below. Include any backup materials and documentation in support of the request. The Shoppes at Santa Barbara Commercial Planned Unit Development (CPUD) is an 18.1± acre project located on the northeast corner of Davis Boulevard and Santa Barbara Boulevard. The property is located within Activity Center #6 of the Future Land Use Element, which is a mixed - use Activity Center. The PUD permits 150,000 square feet of variety of commercial land uses. The property is currently zoned The Shoppes at Santa Barbara CPUD. A portion of the site has been previously developed with a 7-Eleven convenience store with fuel facilities. The applicant proposes to amend the CPUD in order to modify the permitted uses to add multi -family residential as a development option on the 15.1± acres under their control. a. The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer, water, and other utilities. The area is suitable for a mixed -use project. The New Hope MPUD located immediately to the east of the subject site is also within Activity Center #6 and is a mixed -use PUD which has been developed with non-residential and residential dwelling units. The Growth Management Plan encourages mixed use development within the County's designated Activity Centers. The site will be developed with appropriate buffers to separate the non-residential areas from the residential areas within the site. Internal interconnection between the non-residential areas and residential areas will be provided. b. Adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of any proposed agreements, contract, or other instruments, or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense. Findings and recommendations of this type shall be made only after consultation with the countyattorney. The property owner owns 15.1± acres of the overall MPUD, which represents the undeveloped area within the PUD. C. Conformity of the proposed PUD with the goals, objectives and policies of the Growth Management Plan. (This is to include identifying what Sub -district, policy or other May 25, 2021 Page 1 of 8 ADBZSDP Evaluation Criteria-r1. docx G radyti'li nor Clvll hnginccrs • Land Surveyors • Planners • Landscape Architects Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, FL 34134 • 239-947-1144 • engineering@gradyminor.com • www.gradyminor.com provision allows the requested uses/density, and fully explaining/addressing all criteria or conditions of that Sub -district, policy or other provision.) Future Land Use Element: The property is located within Mixed Use Activity Center Subdistrict #6. Policy 5.3 of the Future Land Use Element requires that rezoning must be consistent with the Growth Management Plan. According to the Mixed -Use Activity Center Subdistrict discussion in the FLUE, allowable uses include the full array of commercial and residential uses. Mixed use projects are eligible at a density of 16 dwelling units per acre. The applicant is acquiring 15.1 acres and the 242 multi -family units proposed for a portion of the property is within the density standard for Mixed Use Activity Centers (15.1x16=241.6). The density provisions of the plan provide that where a fractional calculation is .5 or above you round up to the nearest whole unit. This proposal to create a mixed use planned development at this location is consistent with Policy 5.5 of the FLUE as it discourages urban sprawl by confining urban intensities to areas having available urban services. The use is also compatible with the surrounding commercial, community facility and residential development consistent with Policy 5.6 of the FLUE. The project provides for development standards consistent with those previously approved for the commercial only project which was previously found to be compatible with the surrounding land uses. Objective 7, and the implementing policies promote interconnectivity of projects. Interconnections internal and external to the project are encouraged. The PUD will have internal interconnection between the residential and commercial tracts within the PUD. The Shoppes at Santa Barbara PUD provides for a potential vehicular and/or pedestrian interconnection with the adjacent New Hope PUD. A condition regarding the interconnection has been provided in the Transportation Commitment section of the PUD. Policy 7.1: The County shall encourage developers and property owners to connect their properties to fronting collector and arterial roads, except where no such connection can be made without violating intersection spacing requirements of the Land Development Code. The shoppes at Santa Barbara PUD has access locations on both Santa Barbara Boulevard and Davis Boulevard, which are both classified as arterial roadways. The project is consistent with this Policy. Policy 7.2: The County shall encourage internal accesses or loop roads in an effort to help reduce vehicle congestion on nearby collector and arterial roads and minimize the need for traffic signals. May 25, 2021 Page 2 of 8 ADBZSDP Evaluation Criteria-rl.docx The PUD will provide for internal circulation and connection between the residential area and commercial for pedestrians and vehicles. Policy 7.3: All new and existing developments shall be encouraged to connect their local streets and/or interconnection points with adjoining neighborhoods or other developments regardless of land use type. The interconnection of local streets between developments is also addressed in Policy 9.3 of the Transportation Element. The PUD Master Plan identifies the potential location for a vehicular and/or pedestrian interconnection with the New Hope Ministries PUD. The New Hope Ministries PUD only provides for a pedestrian interconnection into the Shoppes at Santa Barbara PUD. Although the New Hope project appears to have constructed a vehicular stub -out near the northern property line, there is no provision for an interconnection at this location, nor does the 30-foot-wide easement located on the Shoppes at Santa Barbara PUD extend from Santa Barbara Boulevard east to the eastern property boundary shared with New Hop Ministries. A condition regarding interconnection is provided in the Transportation Commitment section of the PUD. Policy 7.4: The County shall encourage new developments to provide walkable communities with a blend of densities, common open spaces, civic facilities and a range of housing prices and types. The Shoppes at Santa Barbara PUD will be designed to be a walkable mixed -use community if the residential option is developed. The residential apartment component would have recreational amenities and internal sidewalks linking the residential buildings with the internal amenities, external pedestrian network and the commercial component of the PUD. Conservation and Coastal Management Element: The property was previously in agricultural production at the time of the original PUD rezoning in 1989 and contains no native vegetation. Policy 6.1.1 which requires preservation of native vegetation is not applicable. The property will be required to maintain a minimum 30% open space per the current Land Development Code. Transportation: The project if developed with the residential mixed -use option will result in an overall reduction in traffic impacts on the adjacent arterial roadways. Policy 1.3 of the Transportation Element requires that all projects are consistent with the adopted levels of service adopted as part of the Capital Improvement Element. A traffic impact analysis has been prepared as part of this application and concludes that no level of service impacts results from the proposed PUD amendment to add a residential mixed use development option. May 25, 2021 Page 3 of 8 ADBZSDP Evaluation Criteria-rl.docx The project addresses storm water drainage for a prior expansion of Santa Barbara Boulevard. The expansion utilizes a portion of the property without the necessary drainage easement. Some of the deviations requested as part of the project are necessary to address drainage issue. Potable Water/Sanitary Sewer: The property is within the service area of the Collier County Water and Sewer District. Water and sanitary sewer services are provided to the property and are presently serving the existing convenience store with fuel facilities. Policy 1.3 of the Sanitary Sewer Sub -element requires that Collier County provide sanitary sewer services to maintain adopted levels of service. According to the 2020 AUIR, there are no existing or anticipated deficiencies. Objective 2 and policy 2.1 of the Potable Water Sub -element require Collier County to provide potable water to meet adopted levels of service and to correct system deficiencies. According to the 2020 there are no existing or anticipated deficiencies for water treatment capacity in the Water and Sewer District. d. The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening requirements. The project as proposed is compatible with the surrounding area. The existing commercial development was approved for a maximum height of 60' which will remain unchanged for the residential mixed use development option. The project will provide for appropriate buffering both internally and externally to the project. The project if developed with a residential component will significantly reduce traffic impacts to the surrounding roadways. e. The adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the development. The project will provide a minimum of 30% open space consistent with the requirements of the LDC, which will include native vegetation preserve areas, lakes, buffers and recreational areas. f. The timing or sequence of development for the purpose of assuring the adequacy of available improvements and facilities, both public and private. May 25, 2021 Page 4 of 8 ADBZSDP Evaluation Criteria-rl.docx There are no public facility deficiencies existing or anticipated in the near term that would impact the ability of the project to be developed. The project will also pay impact fees which will off -set any other public facility impacts. g. The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion. The MPUD boundary is not proposed to be modified and cannot be expanded due to existing development to the north and east and existing public roadways to the south and west. h. Conformity with PUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the particular case, based on determination that such modifications of justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations. The MPUD includes development standards and conditions, which will assure compatible and complementary development. 10.02.08 - Requirements for Amendments to the Official Zoning Atlas F. Nature of requirements of Planning Commission report. When pertaining to the rezoning of land, the report and recommendations of the Planning Commission to the Board of County Commissioners required in LDC section 10.02.08 E shall show that the Planning Commission has studied and considered the proposed change in relation to the following findings, when applicable: 1. Whether the proposed change will be consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies and future land use map and the elements of the Growth Management Plan. The analysis provided in Evaluation Criteria item C. addresses consistency with the Growth Management Plan and concludes that the project as proposed is consistent with the various Elements of the Plan. 2. The existing land use pattern. The subject property is located within a mixed -use activity center, as are the properties located to the west across Santa Barbara Boulevard, south across Davis Boulevard, and immediately to the east. The property to the north is a Mixed -Use PUD (Bembridge) which is owned by Collier County. A recent PUD amendment added essential service personnel housing as a permitted use. The PUD currently is developed with the Calusa Park Elementary School, Collier County EMS Station 75 and storm water retention pond. The property is outside the activity center boundary. May 25, 2021 Page 5 of 8 ADBZSDP Evaluation Criteria-rl.docx South of the property across Davis Boulevard is the Taormina Reserve MPUD, which has been cleared and partially developed with a landscape nursery. Immediately east of Taormina Reserve is the Boys and Girls Club of Collier County and the Collier County, which is zoned C-3. Immediately west of the Shoppes at Santa Barbara MPUD is the Countryside PUD. The portion of Countryside adjacent to Santa Barbara Boulevard has been developed with a variety of commercial uses, golf maintenance facilities and golf course. 3. The possible creation of an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts. The MPUD is existing and therefore no isolated district is being created. 4. Whether existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the property proposed for change. The boundaries are not illogically drawn and comprise all of the property under the unified control of the applicant. 5. Whether changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed amendment necessary. Multi -family residential is a viable addition/alternative to the previously authorized 150,000 square feet of commercial use on the property. The PUD in effect does not permit residential development on this tract; therefore, the PUD amendment is necessary in order to provide for the addition of potential residential development. 6. Whether the proposed change will adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood. The MPUD document includes a master plan, schedule of uses, development standards, and developer commitments, which will ensure that it is compatible with the immediately surrounding properties. The MPUD master plan identifies the location of appropriate buffers and open spaces, which will further ensure that the development of the residential mixed -use will have no adverse impact to the neighborhood. 7. Whether the proposed change will create or excessively increase traffic congestion or create types of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses, because May 25, 2021 Page 6 of 8 ADBZSDP Evaluation Criteria-rl.docx of peak volumes or projected types of vehicular traffic, including activity during construction phases of the development, or otherwise affect public safety. A traffic impact analysis has been submitted in support of the proposed amendment and concludes that a significant reduction in traffic results from development of the mixed -use options. 8. Whether the proposed change will create a drainage problem. The project will be required to obtain an Environmental Resource Permit (ERP) through the South Florida Water Management District. The ERP review evaluates historic surface water flows and controls the off -site discharge of stormwater from the site. The project will have internal water management facilities including detention areas to control the drainage for the project. No drainage issues will result from this project. 9. Whether the proposed change will seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas. Development of the site will not result in light or air reduction to surrounding properties. 10. Whether the proposed change will adversely affect property values in the adjacent area. Adding a residential option to the PUD will not adversely impact property values in the areas. 11. Whether the proposed change will be a deterrent to the improvement or development of adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations. All immediately adjacent properties are developed and will have no impact to those properties. 12. Whether the proposed change will constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual owner as contrasted with the public welfare. The proposed change does not constitute a grant of special privilege to the owner. The proposed uses are consistent with the Growth Management Plan. 13. Whether there are substantial reasons why the property cannot be used in accordance with existing zoning. May 25, 2021 Page 7 of 8 ADBZSDP Evaluation Criteria-rl.docx The existing zoning is the Shoppes at Santa Barbara CPUD which permits only commercial land uses. The amendment is necessary to permit residential and mixed land uses within the MPUD. 14. Whether the change suggested is out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the county. The proposed amendment is in scale with the needs of the neighborhood and Collier County. 15. Whether it is impossible to find other adequate sites in the county for the proposed use in districts already permitting such use. It is not impossible to find other adequate sites in the county for the proposed uses; however, this site was previously approved commercial land uses and is a suitable location for the residential uses. It is located in a mixed -use activity center which encourages the proposed mixed use. 16. The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site alteration which would be required to make the property usable for any of the range of potential uses under the proposed zoning classification. The site has been previously cleared and is partially developed with a commercial use. Minimal site alteration is necessary to develop the site as proposed. 17. The impact of development on the availability of adequate public facilities and services consistent with the levels of service adopted in the Collier County Growth Management Plan and as defined and implemented through the Collier County Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance [Code ch. 106, art. II], as amended. There are adequate roadways to the site. There are no public facilities deficiencies at the present time, and none will occur as a result of this project. 18. Such other factors, standards, or criteria that the Board of County Commissioners shall deem important in the protection of the public health, safety, and welfare. The project will accept stormwater discharge volumes at a greater volume than originally anticipated from the County's Bembridge PUD property, which will be accommodated within the eastern 30-foot drainage easement. May 25, 2021 Page 8 of 8 ADBZSDP Evaluation Criteria-rl.docx Co*r County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 Pre -Application Meeting Notes Petition Type: PUDA Date and Time: Wednesday 11/18/2020 9:00 AM Assigned Planner: Tim Finn Engineering Manager (for PPL's and FP's): Project Information Project Name: The Shoppes At Santa Barbara PUD (PUDA) PL#: 20200002233 400244204 Property ID #: 400244107 Current Zoning: PUD 4670 Santa Barbara Blvd., Naples FL 34104 Project Address: I City: State: Zip: Applicant: Sharon Umpenhour Agent Name: D • Wayne Arnold, AICP Phone: 239-947-1144 Agent/Firm Address: 3800 Via Del Rey Property Owner: Strohl Family LLC Please provide the following, if applicable: i. Total Acreage: 15.12 ii. Proposed # of Residential Units: iii. Proposed Commercial Square Footage: iv. V. vi. Bonita City: For Amendments, indicate the original petition number: Springs, FL 34134 State: Zip: If there is an Ordinance or Resolution associated with this project, please indicate the type and number: If the project is within a Plat, provide the name and AR#/PL#: Updated 7/11/2019 Page 1 1 of 5 Co*.•r County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergoy.net Meeting Notes 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 As of 10/16/2017 all Zoning applications have revised applications, and your associated Application is included in your notes; additionally a *new Property Ownership Disclosure Form is required for all applications. A copy of this new form is included in your pre-app Note — link is https://www.colliergov.net/Home/ShowDocument?id=7SO93. If r �... / I ter`- P c h 1 l eE_y, ( 1n :. C,.�e/`.� t �e.. _ 1 � / � � C � /� r2J �t-� 'tJ►� i t 1�-� M 1—� c".-ir) F� Cis► If Site is within the City of Naples Water Service Area please send to Naples Utilities and Planning Departments. Then, if the petition is submitted, we are to send it (by email) to the four persons below in their Utilities and Planning Depts. - along with a request that they send us a letter or email of "no objection" to the petition. Bob Middleton RMiddletonCcDnaplesgov com Allyson Holland AMHollandCcDnaolesgov.com Robin Singer RSingerftaplesgov.com Erica Martin emartin6a1naplesgov com Disclaimer: Information provided by staff to applicant during the Pre -Application Meeting is based on the best available data at the time of the meeting and may not fully inform the applicant of issues that could arise during the process. The Administrative Code and LDC dictates the regulations which all applications must satisfy. Any checklists provided of required data for an application may not fully outline what is needed. It is the applicant's responsibility to provide all required data. Updated 7/11/2019 Page 1 2 of 5 Co*.r County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net Meeting Notes 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 `_ TI'1-q a s Po ti►"�-�-� N . M i tL,- a7r*crAv h P-& 3 * CLQ Itito.ve T vt ��tJ G �T/MnCOvrti'�rT� — �r9kti� ie QeA-.L �b 3 (3 STaR-n� w.a-Teri _ ,Q/LK 02T;\ /� 6 3� Cy oPs - 094A-t , 4wzrk — P6 3 D. Dscf'� �GaNN�wL - M.�ti t 7- Other required documentation for submittal (not listed on application): Disclaimer. Information provided by staff to applicant during the Pre -Application Meeting is based on the best available data at the time of the meeting and may not fully inform the applicant of issues that could arise during the process. The Administrative Code and LDC dictates the regulations which all applications must satisfy. Any checklists provided of required data for an application may not fully outline what is needed. It is the applicant's responsibility to provide all required data. Updated 7/11/2019 Page 1 3 of 5 ThomasClarkeVEN From: SawyerMichael Sent: Wednesday, November 18, 2020 5:41 PM To: ThomasClarkeVEN Subject: RE: Pre-App Notes for The Shoppes at Santa Barbara- (PUDA)-PL20200002233 Thomas, Please check the TIS required box on the pre app checklist as well as methodology on the next page with a note that methodology will be by email to staff. Please also add the following notes: Transportation Planning: Methodology meeting by email required and provide note on TIS cover sheet that fee will be collected at time of PUD submittal. Address all transportation elements of the GMP. Revise access as noted in the meeting and provide easement documentation for the north access. Provide both ITE and SIC use codes in the TIS. Provide -revise (if needed) trip limit based on TIS using standard language: "The maximum total daily trip generation for the PUD shall not exceed two-way PMpeak hour net trips based on the use codes in the ITE Manual on trip generation rates in effect at the time of application for SDP/SDPA or subdivision plat approval. " Appears no change to trip limit is proposed however please make sure the scenario(s) are clear. Thanks, Michael Sawyer Principal Planner Growth Management Department Transportation Planning 2685 South Horseshoe Drive, Suite 103 Naples, Florida 34104 239-252-2926 michael. sawyer(a� col l iercountyfl. gov From: ThomasClarkeVEN <Thomas.Clarke@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Wednesday, November 18, 2020 1:34 PM To: SawyerMichael <Michael.Sawyer@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: Pre-App Notes for The Shoppes at Santa Barbara- (PUDA)-PL2O2000O2233 Hi Mike, Did you have any new notes for today's Pre-App for the above? Tom 740waa eFIT& Operations Coordinator - Zoning Division 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, FL 34104 Phone:239-252-2526 Tell us how we are doing by taking our Zoning Division Survey at http://bit.ly/CollierZoning C IlMeT CouHty ?6, 3 A Transportation Planning and PUD Monitoring Pre-App Notes Developer Commitments: Transportation Planning " The maximum total daily trip generation for the PUD shall not exceed two-way PM peak hour net trips based on the use codes in the ITE Manual on trip generation rates in effect at the time of application for SDP/SDPA or subdivision plat approval." Use Codes Provide both ITE and SIC use codes in the TIS. PUD Monitoring "One entity (hereinafter the Managing Entity) shall be responsible for PUD monitoring until close- out of the PUD, and this entity shall also be responsible for satisfying all PUD commitments until close-out of the PUD. At the time of this CPUD approval, the Managing Entity is the Insert Company Name Here. Should the Managing Entity desire to transfer the monitoring and commitments to a successor entity, then it must provide a copy of a legally binding document that needs to be approved for legal sufficiency by the County Attorney. After such approval, the Managing Entity will be released of its obligations upon written approval of the transfer by County staff, and the successor entity shall become the Managing Entity. As Owner and Developer sell off tracts, the Managing Entity shall provide written notice to County that includes an acknowledgement of the commitments required by the CPUD by the new owner and the new owner's agreement to comply with the Commitments through the Managing Entity, but the Managing Entity shall not be relieved of its responsibility under this Section. When the PUD is closed -out, then the Managing Entity is no longer responsible for the monitoring and fulfillment of PUD commitments." Miscellaneous "Pursuant to Section 125.022(5) F.S., issuance of a development permit by a county does not in any way create any rights on the part of the applicant to obtain a permit from a state or federal agency and does not create any liability on the part of the county for issuance of the permit if the applicant fails to obtain requisite approvals or fulfill the obligations imposed by a state or federal agency or undertakes actions that result in a violation of state or federal law. All other applicable state or federal permits must be obtained before commencement of the development." PG , 3. 6 ThomasClarkeVEN From: OrthRichard Sent: Wednesday, November 18, 2020 11:00 AM To: ThomasClarkeVEN Subject: FW: Pre-App Research for The Shoppes at Santa Barbara PUD (PUDA) - PL20200002233 - Zoom meeting Wednesday 11/18/20 at 9:00 AM Attachments: Pre-App RESEARCH - PL20200002233.pdf; Pre-App NOTES to be submitted with Submittal.pdf Importance: High Thomas, Please include the following four (4) Stormwater Management Program comments into the new pre -application notes: • The project is located within the Lely Canal Basin with a discharge rate of 0.06 cfs/ac. • The drainage easement along the east property line is to be free of any encumbrances to include common area, internal stormwater management or landscape buffering encroachment formulas. • The east drainage easement should be built as an open ditch with a maintenance travel way with the intent to be conveyed to the County for perpetual maintenance. • Please provide a basic stormwater management plan with proposed outfall location(s) and drainage easements. Sincerely, Rick Orth Richard Orth, P.G., Sr. Environmental Specialist Collier County Growth Management Department Capital Project and Impact Fees Program Management Stormwater Management Section 2685 South Horseshoe Drive, Ste 103, Naples, FL 34104 Office 239-252-5092, Cellular 239-634-9024 RichardOrth@CollierGov.Net From: ThomasClarkeVEN <Thomas.Clarke@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Tuesday, November 17, 2020 2:03 PM To: AshtonHeidi <Heidi.Ashton@colliercountyfl.gov>; Beard Laurie <Laurie.Beard @colliercountyfl.gov>; BrownCraig <Craig. Brown@colliercou ntyfl.gov>; CookJaime <Jaime.Cook@colliercountyfl.gov>; CrotteauKathynell <Kathynell.Crotteau@colliercountyfl.gov>; FaulknerSue <Sue.Faulkner@colliercountyfl.gov>; FeyEric <Eric.Fey@colliercountyfl.gov>; JosephitisErin <Erin.Josephitis@colliercountyfl.gov>; OrthRichard <Richard.Orth@colliercountyfl.gov>; PollarclBrandi <Brandi.Pollard@colliercountyfl.gov>; AshkarSally <Sally.Ashkar@colliercountyfl.gov>; SawyerMichael <Michael.Sawyer@colliercountyfl.gov>; TempletonMark <Mark.Templeton@colliercountyfl.gov>; WilkieKirsten <Kirsten.Wilkie@colliercountyfl.gov> Cc: FinnTimothy <Timothy.Finn@colliercountyfl.gov>; FrantzJeremy <Jeremy. Fra ntz@col liercou ntyfl.gov>; AlexandraCasa novaVEN <Alexandra.Casa nova @colliercountyfl.gov>; PerryDerek <Derek.Perry@ col liercountyfl.gov> Subject: Pre-App Research for The Shoppes at Santa Barbara PUD (PUDA) - PL20200002233 - Zoom meeting Wednesday 11/18/20 at 9:00 AM Importance: High Good Afternoon All, P6. 3 :- . ThomasClarkeVEN From: FinnTimothy Sent: Wednesday, November 18, 2020 10:44 AM To: ThomasClarkeVEN Subject: Pre -Application Meeting - PL20200002233 - The Shoppes at Santa Barbara (PUDA) Hi Thomas, Please include the below from Pamela in the pre-app notes you send to the agent. Thank you Hi Timm, We have a pump station and controller in the right of way adjacent to this development. As -built plans are available to the applicant. Thank you, Pam Pamela J. Lulich, PLA, CPM Landscape Operations Manager Timothy Finn, AICP Principal Planner Cower Couvity Zoning Division NOTE: New Email Address as of 1210912017: Timothy. Finn@colliercountyf1.gov 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples Florida 34104 Phone: 239.252.4312 Tell us how we are doing by taking our Zoning Division Survey at http://bit.ly/CollierZoning. Under Florida Law; e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. ;)6 _3.ID. Co)#*er county COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 Meeting Notes Landscape: Label buffers on updated master plan. 20' Type D along West and South 10' Type A along East and North. A 10' Type D buffer will be required at time of SDP along both sides of primary access road through the commercial portion of the development. The 7-eleven pre -dated the landscape requirements for facilities for fuel pumps. Buffers along the West and South of the 7-eleven can be labeled per the originally approved PUD master plan. Co*.r County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 Pre -Application Meeting Sign -In Sheet PL# 20200002233 Collier County Contact Information: Name Review Discipline Phone Email ❑ David Anthony Environmental Review 252-2497 david.anthony@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Claudine Auclair GMD Operations and Regulatory Management 252-5887 claudine.auclair@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Sally Ashkar Assistant County Attorney 252-8842 sally.ashkar@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Steve Baluch Transportation Planning 252-2361 stephen.baluch@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Ray Bellows Zoning, Planning Manager 252-2463 raymond.bellows@colliercountyfl.gov Laurie Beard PUD Monitoring 252-5782 laurie.beard @colliercountyfLgov V Craig Brown Environmental Specialist 252-2548 craig.brown @colIiercountyfLgov ❑ Alexandra Casanova Operations Coordinator 252-2658 Alexandra.casanova @colliercountyfLgov Heidi Ashton Cicko Managing Asst. County Attorney 252-8773 heidi.ashton@colliercountyfl.gov Thomas Clarke Operations Coordinator 252-2584 thomas.clarke@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Jamie Cook Prin. Environmental Specialist 252-6290 Jaime.cook@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Eric Fey, P.E. Utility Planning 252-1037 eric.fey@colliercountyfl.gov Tim Finn, AICP Zoning Division 252-4312 timothy.finn @colliercountyfLgov Lo Sue Faulkner Comprehensive Planning 252-5715 sue.faulkner@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Jeremy Frantz LDC Manager 252-2305 Jeremy.Frantz@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ James French Growth Management Deputy Department Head 252-5717 james.french@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Michael Gibbons Structural/Residential Plan Review 252-2426 michael.gibbons@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Storm Gewirtz, P.E. Engineering Stormwater 252-2434 storm.gewirtz@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Nancy Gundlach, AICP, PLA Zoning Division 252-2484 nancy.gundlach@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Richard Henderlong Principal Planner 252-2464 richard.henderlong@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ John Houldsworth Engineering Subdivision 252-5757 john.houldsworth@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Alicia Humphries Right -Of -Way Permitting 252-2326 alicia.humphries@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Erin Josephitis Environmental Specialist, Senior 252-2915 erin.josephitis@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Marcia Kendall Comprehensive Planning 252-2387 marcia.kendall@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ John Kelly Zoning Senior Planner 252-5719 john.kelly@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Diane Lynch Operations Analyst 252-8243 diane.lynch @colliercountyfLgov ❑ Gil Martinez Zoning Principal Planner 252-4211 1 gilbert.martinez@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Thomas Mastroberto Greater Naples Fire 252-7348 1 thomas.mastroberto@colliercountyfl.gov Updated 7/11/2019 Page 1 4 of 5 Cotr County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 ❑ Jack McKenna, P.E. Engineering Services 252-2911 jack. mckenna@colliercountyfLgov ❑ Matt McLean, P.E. Development Review Director 252-8279 matthew.mclean@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Michele Mosca, AICP Capital Project Planning 252-2466 michele.mosca@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Annis Moxam Addressing 252-5519 annis.moxam@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Richard Orth Stormwater Planning 252-5092 richard.orth@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Brandy Otero Transit 252-5859 brandy.otero@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Brandi Pollard Utility Impact fees 252-6237 brandi.pollard@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Todd Riggall North Collier Fire 597-9227 triggall@northcollierfire.com ❑ Brett Rosenblum, P.E. Development Review Principal Project Manager 252-2905 brett.rosenblum@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ ames Sabo, AICP Zoning Principal Planner 252-2708 james.sabo@colliergo.net Michael Sawyer Transportation Planning 252-2926 michael.sawyer@colliercountyfl.gov le Corby Schmidt, AICP Comprehensive Planning 252-2944 corby.schmidt@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Chris Scott, AICP Development Review - Zoning 252-2460 chris.scott@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Linda Simmons North Collier Fire 252-2311 Linda.Simmons@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Peter Shawinsky Architectural Review 252-8523 peter.shawinsky@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Camden Smith Zoning Operations Manager 252-1042 camden.smith@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Mark Strain Hearing Examiner/CCPC 252-4446 mark.strain@colliercountyfl.gov L�' Mark Templeton Landscape Review 252-2475 mark.templeton@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Jessica Velasco Zoning Division Operations 252-2584 jessica.velasco@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Jon Walsh, P.E. Building Review 252-2962 jonathan.walsh@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ David Weeks, AICP Comprehensive Planning Future Land Use Consistency 252-2306 david.weeks@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Kirsten Wilkie Environmental Review Manager 252-5518 kirsten.wilkie@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Christine Willoughby Development Review -Zoning 252-5748 christine.willoughby@colliercountyfl.gov Daniel Zunzunegui North Collier Fire 252-2310 1 Daniel.Zunzunegui@colliercountyfl.gov V V t &"V- P,C t a. ( Additional Attendee Contact Information: Name Representing Phone Email lt. /'tOLwOL Gt'" 10 qJ- JILJySkw Paw Notar @G/1AA ,cf AZ o Totemilo 4TL- fiaoAr'N-ei ...e-, Updated 7/11/2019 Page 1 5 of 5 v,y Co ter CO-Unty Growth Management Department Zoning Division Applicant/Agent may also send site plans or conceptual plans for review in advance if desired. PL20200002233 —The Shoppes at Santa Barbara PUD (PUDA) Tim Finn PRE APP INFO Assigned Ops Staff: Thomas Clarke Jeremy Frantz-Ops Staff) STAFF FORM FOR SUPPLEMENTAL PRE -APPLICATION MEETING INFORMATION • Name and Number of who submitted pre-app request — Sharon Umpenhour 239.947.1144 • Agent to list for PL# - D. Wayne Arnold, AICP • Owner of property (all owners for all parcels) — Strohl Family LLC • Confirm Purpose of Pre-App: (PUDA) • Please include any Surveys, Drawings or Plans for the petition: • Details about Project: Proposed addition of Multi -family residential uses to existing list of permitted uses. REQUIRED Supplemental Information provided by: Name: Sharon Umpenhour Title: Senior Planning Technician Email: sumpenhour@gradyminor.com Phone: 239.947.1144 Cancellation/Reschedule Requests: Contact Danny Condom ina-Client Services Supervisor danny.condomina@colliercountyfl Phone: 239-252-6866 Created April 5, 2017 Location: K:\CDES Planning Services\Current\Zoning Staff Information 'j Zol ang Division • 2800 North Horseshoe Drive • Naples, Florida 34104. 239-252-2400 • www.colhergov.net Co er Count y COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 PROPERTY OWNERSHIP DISCLOSURE FORM This is a required form with all land use petitions, except for Appeals and Zoning Verification Letters. Should any changes of ownership or changes in contracts for purchase occur subsequent to the date of application, but prior to the date of the final public hearing, it is the responsibility of the applicant, or agent on his behalf, to submit a supplemental disclosure of interest form. Please complete the following, use additional sheets if necessary. a. If the property is owned fee simple by an INDIVIDUAL, tenancy by the entirety, tenancy in common, or joint tenancy, list all parties with an ownership interest as well as the C. CIL,CIILd};C UI JULn InLereSL: Name and Address I % of Ownership I If the property is owned by a CORPORATION, list the officers and stockholders and the ercentage of stocK owned by each: I Name and Address I % of Ownership If the property is in the name of a TRUSTEE, list the beneficiaries of the trust with the CI I.CIIIdgt= UI IIILCr CSL. I Name and Address I % of Ownership I Created 9/28/2017 Page 1 of 3 Co er County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliereov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 d. If the property is in the name of a GENERAL or LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, list the name of the e f meld! drla/Ur IImILea partners: Name and Address % of Ownership If there is a CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE, with an individual or individuals, a Corporation, Trustee, or a Partnership, list the names of the contract purchasers below, including the Is Iill.clJ, JwL,K11UIUefJ, UCIIeIICldrleS, Ur pdrLn(2rs: Name and Address % of Ownership Date of Contract: If any contingency clause or contract terms involve additional parties, list all individuals or c__ •r of I IL.c1 J, it d L.UI Pul dLIUI I, Pdl UltlI )Illpl UI LI USL: Name and Address Date subject property acquired Ell -eased: Term of lease years /months If, Petitioner has option to buy, indicate the following: Created 9/28/2017 Page 2 of 3 Co er Count y COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net Date of option: 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Date option terminates: , or Anticipated closing date: AFFIRM PROPERTY OWNERSHIP INFORMATION Any petition required to have Property Ownership Disclosure, will not be accepted without this form. Requirements for petition types are located on the associated application form. Any change in ownership whether individually or with a Trustee, Company or other interest -holding party, must be disclosed to Collier County immediately if such change occurs prior to the petition's final public hearing. As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is included in this submittal package. I understand that failure to include all necessary submittal information may result in the delay of processing this petition. The completed application, all required submittal materials, and fees shall be submitted to: Growth Management Department ATTN: Business Center 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Agent/Owner Signature Agent/Owner Name (please print) Date Created 9/28/2017 Page 3 of 3 Sharon Umpenhour From: ThomasClarkeVEN <Thomas.Clarke@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Monday, February 01, 2021 3:44 PM To: Sharon Umpenhour Cc: FinnTimothy Subject: RE: The Shoppes at Santa Barbara PUD (PUDA) - PL20200002233 Attachments: PUDA Application Checklist corrections.pdf Hi Sharon, Tim said your request below is fine, I have scanned and attached the corrected Page 9 & 10 of the PUDA Application for your submission. Use this email for confirmation. Thank You, 7 &�m& Operations Coordinator - Zoning Division 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, FL 34104 Phone: 239-252-2526 From: Sharon Umpenhour <SUmpenhour@gradyminor.com> Sent: Monday, February 01, 2021 3:11 PM To: ThomasClarkeVEN <Thomas.Clarke@colliercountyfl.gov> Cc: FinnTimothy <Timothy.Finn@colliercountyfl.gov>; FrantzJeremy <Jeremy.Frantz@col liercountyfl.gov>; AlexandraCasanovaVEN <Alexandra.Casanova@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: RE: The Shoppes at Santa Barbara PUD (PUDA) - PL20200002233 EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Good afternoon Thomas, Correct to email below, I was looking at the wrong preapp notes. Could you revise to mark the following as not required. • List identifying owner and all parties of corporation —this item is already required as the property ownership disclosure form • Signed and sealed boundary survey —the PUD boundary is not changing • Architectural rendering — we usually do not provide this item with the first submittal • Completed Exhibits A-F — this is a PUD amendment which requires strikethrough/underline of the original PUD doc. Thanks i Co*r County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliercounty.gov Final Submittal Requirement Checklist for: ❑ PUD Rezone- Ch. 3 G. 1 of the Administrative Code Amendment to PUD- Ch. 3 G. 2 of the Administrative Code PUD to PUD Rezone- Ch. 3 G. 1 of the Administrative Code 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 The following Submittal Requirement checklist is to be utilized during the Pre -Application Meeting and at time of application submittal. At final submittal, the checklist is to be completed and submitted with an up-to-date application. Please provide the submittal items in the exact order listed below, with cover sheets attached to each section. Incomplete submittals will not be accepted. A Model PUD Document is available online at http://www.colliercountyfl.gov/Home/ShowDocument?id=76983. REQUIREMENTS COPIES REQUIRED NOT REQUIRED Cover Letter with Narrative Statement including a detailed description of why amendment is necessary 1 ® ❑ Completed Application with required attachments (download latest version) 1 Pre -application meeting notes 1 ❑ Affidavit of Authorization, signed and notarized 1 Property Ownership Disclosure Form 1 Notarized and completed Covenant of Unified Control 1 Completed Addressing Checklist 1 Warranty Deed(s) 1IR❑ List Identifying Owner and all parties of corporation 1 iiik ®" Signed and sealed Boundary Survey 1 Architectural Rendering of proposed structures 1 Current Aerial Photographs (available from Property Appraiser) with project boundary and, if vegetated, FLUCFCS Codes with legend included on aerial. 1 ❑ Statement of Utility Provisions 1 ❑ Environmental Data Requirements pursuant to LDC section 3.08.00 1 ❑ Environmental Data Requirements collated into a single Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) packet at time of public hearings. Coordinate with project planner at time of public hearings. ❑ ❑ Listed or Protected Species survey, less than 12 months old. Include copies of previous surveys. 1 ❑ Traffic Impact Study 1 ❑ Historical Survey 1 ❑ School Impact Analysis Application, if applicable 1 ❑ Electronic copy of all required documents 1 ❑ Completed Exhibits A-F (see below for additional information)' m List of requested deviations from the LDC with justification for each (this document is separate from Exhibit E) © ❑ Checklist continues on next page March 4, 2020 Page 9 of 11 Co*.r County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.col I iercounty.gov 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Revised Conceptual Master Site Plan 24" x 36"and One 8 %" x 11" copy ❑ Original PUD document/ordinance, and Master Plan 24" x 36" — Only if Amending the PUD ❑ Revised PUD document with changes crossed thru & underlined 1 ® ❑ Copy of Official Interpretation and/or Zoning Verification 1 ❑ *If located in Immokalee or seeking affordable housing, include an additional set of each submittal requirement 'The following exhibits are to be completed on a separate document and attached to the application packet: Exhibit A: List of Permitted Uses Exhibit B: Development Standards Exhibit C: Master Plan- See Chapter 3 E. 1. of the Administrative Code �( Exhibit D: Legal Description Exhibit E: List of Requested LDC Deviations and justification for each Exhibit F: List of Development Commitments If located in RFMU (Rural Fringe Mixed Use) Receiving Land Areas Pursuant to LDC subsection 2.03.08.A.2.a.2.(b.)i.c., the applicant must contact the Florida Forest Service at 239- 690-3500 for information regarding "Wildfire Mitigation & Prevention Plan." PLANNERS — INDICATE IF THE PETITION NEEDS TO BE ROUTED TO THE FOLLOWING REVIEWERS: El School District (Residential Components): Amy Lockheart ElConservancy of SWFL: Nichole Johnson Utilities Engineering: Eric Fey Parks and Recreation: Barry Williams (Director) Emergency Management: Dan Summers Immokalee Water/Sewer District: City of Naples: Robin Singer, Planning Director ❑ I Other: ❑ City of Naples Utilities I ❑ I Other: ASSOCIATED FEES FOR APPLICATION �a Pre -Application Meeting: $500.00 ❑ PUD Rezone: $10,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre ❑ PUD to PUD Rezone: $8,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre PUD Amendment: $6,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre Comprehensive Planning Consistency Review: $2,250.00 -AO Environmental Data Requirements -EIS Packet (submittal determined at pre -application N meeting): $2,500.00 �❑ Listed or Protected Species Review (when an EIS is not required): $1,000.00 Transportation Review Fees:w,i.` o Methodology Review: $500.00 *Additional fees to be determined at Methodology Meeting. o Minor Study Review: $750.00 o Major Study Review $1,500.00 March 4, 2020 Page 10 of 11 Co*.r County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliercounty.gov X Legal Advertising Fees: o CCPC: $1,125.00 o BCC: $500.00 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 ❑ School Concurrency Fee, if applicable: o Mitigation Fees, if application, to be determined by the School District in coordination with the County Fire Code Plans Review Fees are not listed, but are collected at the time of application submission and those fees are set forth by the Authority having jurisdiction. The Land Development Code requires Neighborhood Notification mailers for Applications headed to hearing, and this fee is collected prior to hearing. All checks payable to: Board of County Commissioners. As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is included in this submittal package. I understand that failure to include all necessary submittal information may result in the delay of processing this petition. *Additional fee for the 5t' and subsequent re -submittal will be accessed at 20% of the original fee. Signature of Petitioner or Agent Printed named of signing party Date March 4, 2020 Page 11 of 11 AFFIDAVIT OF AUTHORIZATION FOR PETITION NUMBERS(S) PL202000OU33 1 Myles L. strohl (print name), as Manager (title, if applicable) of Strohi Family, Lc (company, If applicable), swear or affirm under oath, that I am the (choose one)—owneroneT—owner= applicant contract purchaser and that: 1. I have full authority to secure the approval(s) requested and to impose covenants and restrictions on the referenced property as a result of any action approved by the County in accordance with this application and the Land Development Code; 2. All answers to the questions in this application and any sketches, data or other supplementary matter attached hereto and made a part of this application are honest and true; 3. 1 have authorized the staff of Collier County to enter upon the property during normal working hours for the purpose of investigating and evaluating the request made through this application; and that 4. The property will be transferred, conveyed, sold or subdivided subject to the conditions and restrictions imposed by the approved action. 5. Well authorize Altman Development Company, LLC to act as ourimy representative in any matters regarding this petition including 1 through 2 above. 'Notes: • If the applicant is a corporation, then it is usually executed by the Corp. pros, or v, pres. • If the applicant is a Limited Liability Company (L.L.C.) or Limited Company (L.C.), then the documents should typically be signed by the Company's Managing Member." • If the applicant is a partnership, then typically a partner can sign on behalf of the partnership. • If the applicant is a limited partnership, then the general partner must sign and be identified as the "general partner" of the named partnership. • If the applicant is a trust, then they must include the trustee's name and the words as trustee'. • In each instance, first determine the applicant's status, e.g., individual, corporate, trust, partnership, and then use the appropriate format for that ownership. Under penalties of perjury, I declare that 1 have read the foregoing Affidavit of Authorization and that the facts stated In it are true. Signature Date STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER The foregoing instrument was acknowleged before me by means of Physical presence or online notarization this day of FQbVy�_, 2021 , by (printed name of owner or qualifier) Mvles Stmk.k Such person(s) Notary Public must check applicable box: Are personally known to me ® Has produced a current drivers license ® Has produced as identification Notary Signature: CP109-COA-001151155 REV 3/4/2020 KALEJG H BELL L� Notary Public -State of hlorida Commission # HH 3751 My Commission Expires June 28, 2021 AFFIDAVIT OF AUTHORIZATION FOR PETITION NUMBERS(S) PL20200002233 1 Joel L. Allman (print name), as CEO/Chairman (title, if applicable) Of Altman Development Company, LLC (company, If applicable), swear or affirm under oath, that I am the (choose one) owner= applicant =contract purchaser and that: 1. 1 have full authority to secure the approval(s) requested and to impose covenants and restrictions on the referenced property as a result of any action approved by the County in accordance with this application and the Land Development Code; 2. All answers to the questions in this application and any sketches, data or other supplementary matter attached hereto and made a part of this application are honest and true; 3. 1 have authorized the staff of Collier County to enter upon the property during normal working hours for the purpose of investigating and evaluating the request made through this application; and that 4. The property will be transferred, conveyed, sold or subdivided subject to the conditions and restrictions imposed by the approved action. 5. Well authorize O. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. and Coleman, Yovanovlch & Koester. P.A. to act as our/my representative in any matters regarding this petition including 1 through 2 above. *Notes: • If the applicant is a corporation, then it is usually executed by the corp. pres. or v. pres. • If the applicant is a Limited Liability Company (L.L.C.) or Limited Company (L.C.), then the documents should typically be signed by the Company's "Managing Member." • If the applicant is a partnership, then typically a partner can sign on behalf of the partnership. • If the applicant is a limited partnership, then the general partner must sign and be identified as the "general partner' of the named partnership. • If the applicant is a trust, then they must include the trustee's name and the words "as trustee". • In each instance, first determine the applicant's status, e.g., individual, corporate, trust, partnership, and then use the appropriate format for that ownership. Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I have read the foregoing Affidavit of Authorization and that the factsI ed in it are true. 3 ia► •ai Signature Date STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER The foregoing instrumen was acknowleged before me by means of n6hysical presence or Elonline notarization this aday of MQricn 20 27 , by (printed name of owner or qualifier) rSSu�ch person(s) Notary Public must check applicable box: Lb Are personally known to me [3 Has produced a current drivers license E] Has produced as identificatipn. Notary Signature: O CP\08-COA-00115\155 REV 3/4/2020 Notary Public State of Flori le St;IbP..iOfI 0.4 1 My onimissonn MH 031125 Iw o�� lx.nesM11/2024 Coitie' v County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 PROPERTY OWNERSHIP DISCLOSURE FORM This is a required form with all land use petitions, except for Appeals and Zoning Verification Letters. Should any changes of ownership or changes in contracts for purchase occur subsequent to the date of application, but prior to the date of the final public hearing, it is the responsibility of the applicant, or agent on his behalf, to submit a supplemental disclosure of interest form. Please complete the following, use additional sheets if necessary. a. If the property is owned fee simple by an INDIVIDUAL, tenancy by the entirety, tenancy in common, or joint tenancy, list all parties with an ownership interest as well as the is ercentage oT such interest: Name and Address % of Ownership N.A. If the property is owned by a CORPORATION, list the officers and stockholders and the percentage of stock owned by each: Name and Address % of Ownership Strohl Family, LLC 328 Bow Line Bend, Naples FL 34103 100 Myles L Strohl, Manager 100 If the property is in the name of a TRUSTEE, list the beneficiaries of the trust with the ercentage oT interest: Name and Address % of Ownership N.A. d. If the property is in the name of a GENERAL or LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, list the name of the general and/or limited partners: Name and Address % of Ownership N.A. Created 9/28/2017 Page 1 of 3 Coder County e COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 If there is a CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE, with an individual or individuals, a Corporation, Trustee, or a Partnership, list the names of the contract purchasers below, includingthe officers, stockholders, beneficiaries, orpartners: Name and Address % of Ownership Altman Development Company, LLC 1515 S Federal Hwy #300, Boca Raton, FL 33432 The Altman Companies, LLC 100 1515 S Federal Hwy #300, Boca Raton, FL 33432* Jeffery Roberts, President Timothy A. Petterson, Executive Vice President Nat Barganier, Vice President Susan Fry, Assistant Secretary Joel L Altman, CEO, Chairman and stockholder 50 Seth Wise, Executive Vice President Rob Rabin, VP, CFO, Secretary Derek Lubsen, VP Andrew Meran, VP BBX Altman Operating Entities, LLC, stockholder 50 BBX Capital, Inc., a public company 100 *The Altman Companies, LLC, 1515 S Federal Hwy #300, Boca Raton, FL 33432 Joel L Altman, Manager, CEO, Chairman and stockholder 50 Timothy A. Petterson, Manager, Executive Vice President, COO Alan B. Levan, Manager Seth Wise, Manager, Co -Chief Executive Officer Rob Rabin, VP, CFO, Secretary Jeffery Roberts, Vice President Susan Fry, Assistant Secretary BBX Altman Operating Entities, LLC, stockholder 50 BBX Capital, Inc., a public company 100 Date of Contract: November 2, 2020 If any contingency clause or contract terms involve additional parties, list all individuals or officers, if a corporation, partnership, ortrust: Created 9/28/2017 Page 2 of 3 Coder County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.collierizov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Name and Address N.A. g. Date subject property acquired 2012 ❑ Leased: Term of lease years /months If, Petitioner has option to buy, indicate the following: Date of option: Date option terminates: , or Anticipated closing date: AFFIRM PROPERTY OWNERSHIP INFORMATION Any petition required to have Property Ownership Disclosure, will not be accepted without this form. Requirements for petition types are located on the associated application form. Any change in ownership whether individually or with a Trustee, Company or other interest -holding party, must be disclosed to Collier County immediately if such change occurs prior to the petition's final publichearing. As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is included in this submittal package. I understand that failure to include all necessary submittal information may result in the delay of processing this petition. The completed application, all required submittal materials, and fees shall be submitted to: Growth Management Department ATTN: Business Center 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 May 26, 2021 Agent/Owner Signature Date D. Wayne Arnold, AICP Agent/Owner Name (please print) Created 9/28/2017 Page 3 of 3 CO*,r County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliercounty.gov (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-63SS COVENANT OF UNIFIED CONTROL The undersigned do hereby swear or affirm that we are the fee simple titleholders and owners of record of property commonly known as The Shoppes at Santa Barbara PUD, Parcel No. 00400244107 4670 Santa Barbara Boulevard (Street address and City, State and Zip Code) and legally described in ExhibitA attached hereto. The property described herein is the subject of an application for Mixed Use planned unit development ( M PUD) zoning. We hereby designateAUmanDavetopmentCo-pony,LLC legal representative thereof, as the legal representatives of the property and as such, these individuals are authorized to legally bind all owners of the property in the course of seeking the necessary approvals to develop. This authority includes, but is not limited to, the hiring a nd authorization of agents to assist in the preparation of applications, plans, surveys, and studies necessary to obtain zoning approval on the site. These representatives will remain the only entity to authorize development activity on the property until such time as a new or amended covenant of unified control is delivered to Collier County. The undersigned recognize the following and will be guided accordingly in the pursuit of development of the project: 1. The property will be developed and used in conformity with the approved master plan including all conditions placed on the development and all commitments agreed to by the applicant in connection with the planned unit development rezoning. 2. The legal representative identified herein is responsible for compliance with all terms, conditions, safeguards, and stipulations made at the time of approval of the master plan, even if the property is subsequently sold in whole or in part, unless and until a new or amended covenant of unified control is delivered to and recorded by Collier County. 3. A departure from the provisions of the approved plans or a failure to comply with any requirements, conditions, or safeguards provided for in the planned unit development process will constitute a violation of the Land Development Code. 4. All terms and conditions of the planned unit development approval will be incorporated into covenants and restrictions which run with the land so as to provide notice to subsequent owners that all development activity within the planned unit development must be consistent with those terms and conditions. S. So long as this covenant is in force, Collier County can, upon the discovery of noncompliance with the terms, safeguards, and conditions of the planned unit development, seek equitable relief as necessary to compel compliance. The County will not issue permits, certificates, or licenses to occupy or use any part of the planned unit development and the County may stop ongoing construction activity until the project is brought into compliance with all terms, conditions and safeguards of the planned unit development. Owner Owner Myles L. Strohl as Manager of Stroh[ Family LLC Printed Name Printed Name STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER The foregoing instrument was acknowleged before me by means of [Rtysical presence oranline notarization this day of Y V0k1r�' 20 21 by (printed name of owner or qualifier) Myles L. Stroh] as Manager of Strobl Family u.c Su person(s) Notary ublic must check applicable box: Are personally known to me ®Has produced a current drivers license [:]Has produced as identification. YP�., KALEIGH BELL " e4� Notary Public=State of Florida Commission g HH 3751 Notary Signature: ,,�c My Commission Expires June 28. 2021 °„°;;; March 4, 2020 f 11 *** OR 4662 PG 614 *** EMMIT A OR: 1"tPG: -W PROPERTY DR/PTTON A PCIr710N OF 4F SMMf%57 OU4R/f7f (IF SiEt1LO4 S 7DL LM 80 Snillli /dYW 2ZT r4sr. COCLIEN CL7fAflY. p MD SaW LL1R£ P�R7> S1lNZLY DESC74HD AS ralam OCMdmx a7 1w SMMAM T CXY7 m O• Scam A 701f 5w QO S'wm RAM:[ 10 ZWT. C M"W;;;. n VA;Mt '77�1.F RLM frtlr77l OfYL79C iLST, ./LMC 7✓'C MFSt !lE lflE Si)VTf(!ES► OtHRfal CM Slo SL=DON 4 fL1t A pSTMgC OF tStW fFF1; OVIVE MN MWM 8"?WT 'AST. Mft= M YW WM LYf O' RL SOL77 MENT OtbVMY CF •SW SrCMN 4. !OR A LlL WXE Of 1OQ00 fFW W DE PWfT CF BEM WJM OF 7W PAgCM OF LND MVWV DEWWV)x Mr-r RCM ACYr1f! OIM31 6" ►EST- A%ftla mm PC bw LJW Or DE sovbmEsr AMMM OF sow ,5WWM A /W A DtSr4Wr OF 12=44 fZ T M RE MWM Loc LF M SOU"EST CEAMD? Cr ?W 50LRFM67 OI1#VM OF 540 SM7XH 4. WOM AM "W SM)MST 0.WM Cr S1D 5£r7 4 FMI A MRWCE O' 17-M fIIT 70 W i Collier County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net ADDRESSING CHECKLIST 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 252-5724 Please complete the following and email to GMD_Addressing@colliergov.net or fax to the Operations Division at 239-252-5724 or submit in person to the Addressing Section at the above address. Form must be si , n�Y Addressing personnel prior to pre -application meeting, please allow 3 days for processing. Not all items will apply to every project. Items in bold type are required. FOLIO NUMBERS MUST BE PROVIDED. Forms older than 6 months will require additional review and approval by the Addressing Section. PETITION TYPE (Indicate type below, complete a separate Addressing Checklist for each Petition type) ❑ BL (Blasting Permit) ❑ SDP (Site Development Plan) ❑ BD (Boat Dock Extension) ❑ SDPA (SDP Amendment) ❑ Carnival/Circus Permit ❑ SDPI (Insubstantial Change to SDP) ❑ CU (Conditional Use) ❑ SIP (Site Improvement Plan) ❑ EXP (Excavation Permit) ❑ SIPI (Insubstantial Change to SIP) ❑ FP (Final Plat ❑ SNR (Street Name Change) ❑ LLA (Lot Line Adjustment) ❑ SNC (Street Name Change — Unplatted) ❑ PNC (Project Name Change) ❑ TDR (Transfer of Development Rights) ❑ PPL (Plans & Plat Review) ❑ VA (Variance) ❑ PSP (Preliminary Subdivision Plat) ❑ VRP (Vegetation Removal Permit) ❑ PUD Rezone ❑ VRSFP (Vegetation Removal & Site Fill Permit) ❑ RZ (Standard Rezone) ❑ OTHER PUDA LEGAL DESCRIPTION of subject property or properties (copy of lengthy description may be attached) S4, T50, R26 (See attached) FOLIO (Property ID) NUMBER(s) of above (attach to, or associate with, legal description if more than one) 00400120001,00400244107 and 00400244204 STREET ADDRESS or ADDRESSES (as applicable, if already assigned) 4670 Santa Barbara Blvd and 7445 Davis Blvd • LOCATION MAP must be attached showing exact location of project/site in relation to nearest public road right- of-way • SURVEY (copy -needed only for unplatted properties) CURRENT PROJECT NAME (if applicable) The Shoppes at Santa Barbara PUD name not yet approved PROPOSED PROJECT NAME (if applicable) PROPOSED STREET NAMES (if applicable) SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN NUMBER (for existing projects/sites only) SDP - or AR or PL # Rev. 6/9/2017 Page 1 of 2 Collier County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 252-5724 Project or development names proposed for, or already appearing in, condominium documents (if application; indicate whether proposed or existing) The Shoppes at Santa Barbara PUD Please Return Approved Checklist By: 0 Email Applicant Name: Sharon Umpenhour Phone: ❑ Fax ❑ Personally picked up Email/Fax: sumpenhour@gradyminor.com Signature on Addressing Checklist does not constitute Project and/or Street Name approval and is subject to further review by the Operations Division. FOR STAFF USE ONLY Folio Number 00400120001, 00400244107 and 00400244204 Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Approved by: Z�' '_/Lo �/_ Date: 02/16/2021 Updated by: Date: IF OLDER THAN 6 MONTHS, FORM MUST BE UPDATED OR NEW FORM SUBMITTED Rev. 6/9/2017 Page 2 of 2 2.2 The subject property is described as followss LEGAL DESCRIPTION The West half of the Southwest quarter of the Southwest quarter of Section 4, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, LESS the Westerly 60 feet thereof for Santa Barbara Boulevard and LESS the Southerly 75 feet thereof for State Road 84 (Davis Boulevard). Collier County Property Appraiser Property Summary Parcel No 00400120001 Site Address*Disclaimer Site City NAPLES Site Zone *Note 34104 Name/Address COLLIER CNTY TRANSPORTATION RIGHT-OF-WAY 2885 HORSESHOE DRIVE S City NAPLES State I FL I Zip 34104 Map No. Strap No. Section Township Range Acres *Estimated 51304 000100 012 5B04 4 50 26 6.35 Legal 4 50 26 WLY 60FT OF NW1/4 OF SW1/4 & N 60FT OF S 135FT OF W1/2 OF SW14 OF SW1/4 & W 100' OF W1/2 OF SW1/4 OF SW1/4 LESS R/W, E 40FT OF W 100FT OF N 30OFT OF S1/2 OF NW1/4 OF SW1/4 Latest Sales History Not all Sales are listed due to Confidentiality) Date Book -Page Amount 06/01/85 1 1141-1114 $ 0 2020 Certified Tax Roll (Subject to Change) Land Value (+) Improved Value (_) Market Value (-) 10% Cap (_) Assessed Value $ 100 $ 0 $ 100 $ 39 $ 61 (_) School Taxable Value $ 0 (_) Taxable Value $ 0 F all Values shown above equal 0 this parcel was created after the Final Tax Roll Collier County Property Appraiser Property Summary Site 4670 1 Parcel No 00400244107 Address SANTA Site City NAPLES Site Zone 34104 *Disclaimer BARBARA Note BLVD Name/Address STROHL FAMILY LLC 328 BOW LINE BEND NAPLES I State I FL I Zin134103 1 ap No. Strap No Section 51304 1 000100 020 51304 1 4 Wip I Range I Acres *Estii 50 1 26 1 15.08 4 50 26 COM AT SW CNR SEC 4, N 01 DEG W 135 FT, N 89 DEG E 100 FT, N 01 DEG Legal W 196.05 FT TO POB N 01 DEG W 1064.59 FT, N 88 DEG E 557.38 FT, S 01 DEG E 1261. 67FT, S 89 DEG W 356.52 FT, N 196.05 FT, W 200 FT TO POB LESS OR 2440 ,9PG 1829 Millage Area.1 269 Sub./Condo 100 -ACREAGE HEADER Use Code 0 10 - VACANT COMMERCIAL Latest Sales History (Not all Sales are listed due to Confidentiality) Date ook-Pa a IWAmount 12/04/12 4862-612 $ 0 10/03/12 4841-3585 $ 100 02/09/05 3731-119 1 $ 4,566,000 11/01/89 1483-1617 1 $ 3,511,000 Millage Rates O *Calculations School Other Total 5.016 1 6.4786 11.4946 2020 Preliminary Tax Roll (Subiect to Chanae) Land Value $ 3,284,487 (+) Improved Value $ 0 (_) Market Value $ 3,284,487 (_) Assessed Value $ 3,284,487 (_) School Taxable Value M $ 3,284,487 (_) Taxable Value $ 3,284,487 If all Values shown above equal 0 this parcel was created after the Final Tax Roll Collier County Property Appraiser Property Summary Site 7445 Site Zone Parcel No 00400244204 Address DAVIS Site City NAPLES *Note 34104 *Disclaimer BLVD Name /Address 7-ELEVEN, INC RYAN LLC THREE GALLERIA TOWER 131 SS NOEL RD #100 LB73 M Cites DALLAS I State9TX I Zip175240 Map No. L Strap N Section ToyMiip Range Acres *Estimated 51304 000100 021 5B04 1 4 50 26 1.04 04 50 26 COM AT SW CNR SEC 4, N 89 DEG E 100 FT, N 01 DEG W 135 FT TO Legal POB, N 01 DEG W 196. 05 FT, N 89 DEG E 200 FT, S 01 DEG E 196.05 FT, S 89 DEG W 200 FT TO POB AND THAT 20FT X 210.63FT AND 10.63FT X 196.05 FT PARCEL JDESC IN OR 2440 PG 1829 Millage Area 0 269 Millage Rates 0 *Calculations Sub./fond% 100 - ACREAGE HEADER School Other Total Use Code 0 11 - STORES, ONE STORY 5.016 6.4786 11.4946 Latest Sales History 2020 Preliminary Tax Roll (Not all Sales are listed due to Confidentiality) (Subject to Change) AlWate Book -Page Amoun 02/21/00 2692-715 $ 0 07/15/98 2441-217 $ 550,000 07/14/9 1 440-1828 $ 62000 11/01/89 1 1483-1665 $ 663:425 Land Value $ 392,200 (+) Improved Value $ 494,456 (_) Market Value $ 886,656 (_) Assessed Value $ 886,656 (_) School Taxable Value $ 886,656 (_) Taxable Value $ 886,656 If all Values shown above equal 0 this parcel was created after the Final Tax Roll Collier County Property Appraiser Property Aerial Site 4670 1 A ANT Parcel No 00400244107 Address SSA ARA Site City NAPLES Site Zone *Note 34104 *Disclaimer BLVD Open GIS in a New Window with More Features. INSTR 4771424 OR 4862 PG 612 RECORDED 12/7/2012 9:17 AM PAGES 3 DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT, COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA DOC@.70 $0.70 REC $27.00 0 Tim INSTRUMENT PREPARED RTTHOUT oprNioN OR REVIEW OF TrrLE BY AND AFTER RFCORDINO RETURY TO: KI?1BERLY LEAC3i JOHNSON, ESQ. QUARLES B BRADY LL.P 1395 PANTHERLANE, SUrrE 300 NAPLEs. FLORIDA 34109-7874 PROPERTYIDO:00400244107 RECORDING FEE: $27.00 DOCLTmEN,rARY STAMPTAX: SO.70 WARRANTY DEED THIS INDENTURE, made this �t_ day of December, 2012, by MYLES L. STROHL and KAREN R. STROHL, husband and wife (collectively "Grantor"), and STROHL FAMILY LLC, a Florida limited liability company, whose post office address is: 328 Bow Line Bend, Naples, Florida 34103 ("GRANTEE") Witnesseth: That the Grantor, for and in consideration of the sum of TEN AND NO/100 DOLLARS (S10.00) and other valuable consideration -to f at, in paid by the Grantee, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged ha""' gt t b "in Y d�Gld to the Grantee, its successors and assigns forever, the follo�vu to t i,3ji „and being in the County of Collier, State of Florida (her ina, collectively called the ` P D&k). to wit: Property Address And the Grantor same against the lawfu c I. Conditii easementlt 2. Applicable 3. Outstandir 4. Taxes and 4XH1B'1 ?>,A" ATTAC.UED talta Bares Bl�y , pl , gr 34104 ebyY fury r64ak j ­ ,tAl to''Aid ands and will defend the all < n rssj}wl o si, ver, su ject ho c , to the following: cL ,r sits, declarations re s tions jim- it h, �, reservations and �E and other governmentai r ulat}on§p sand mineral interests of recall ,l ;�ttt� for current and subsedueai' . IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Year first above written. Witnesses as to both: Witness #1 Printed Name fitness #2�gnat,u Y Cr js+norA rn&,, Witness r2 Printed Name "cuted this instrument on the day and GRANTOR: —44- 100� 4-— MYL STROHL RE. .STROHL QB\I8317159.1 OR 4862 PG 613 STATE OF FLORIDA ) )ss. COUNTY OF COLLIER ) I hereby certify that on this day, before me, a Notary Public duly authorized in the State and County named above to take acknowledgments, personally appeared MYLES L. STROHL and iCAREN R. STROHL 0 who are personally known to me; or ❑ who have produced drivers' licenses as identification and who did not take an oath, that they are the persons collectively described as Grantor in and who executed the foregoing deed, and acknowledged before me that said persons executed that deed. WITNESS my hand and official seal this 4 day of December, 2012. (SEAL) 4�t" NOTARY PCBLIC•sTATE OF FLO$= Nota Public - Sate of Florid JIMON Linda Anders Printed lame: COMMiSsiOn * EE099S67 My Commission Expires: 10 6 `'••' ••` Expires: JUNE 02, 201S BOND ED7MUAnA%-nCBO.NDL;GCO,B C, r� M QBU 8817159.1 *** OR 4862 PG 614 *** OR: lHt PG:'ft'M PROPERTY DESCR/PRON A PU471TN or THE SoUpftn7 Ou4RTER OF sMm 4, TDNTRNr So soM RMCE 25 MS7. LYE V? MNTY F7LRdA PEAL ACRE PAR7J XUMY DESC MED AS UOMA210E AT gj sOU71+R 7 arznLl7T Lv' sLr7xw 4, 7DANSNL� 50 9OUM RM-cE 26 E45T. OOUJER LYJCNITY, FLO M •THE' RIM NS7RTH 0IM"r. WEST, ACOWO THE WEST LAC OF TW 509714IbEST QUVM OF SW SM)ON 4. FOR A DISTANCE OF 13SOO FEET, Mg(C£ REN NORM d901107EAST, PAMJC M 011N "E SOM LAW OF Fr — SDUTHMEST OUWIFR OF SW 5EMN A .Pq4 A UC NtT OF 1=00 MT TO DE POOIT CK BEGMM a7 7W PAPM OF LAND Ff£ROF L T700c'£ RM NORM 07'0-rG16- REST. PARALLa *rH THE WEST LAE OF PC SOVIHI►EST QU4RIER OJ SMD 15ECWN 7, FEW A DISMtE OF 126M 4 FEET 70 7TE MM LAr OF TFE St7IF7NRE5T QLNR7ER OF THE 50UIM►FST OCKWM? OF SW SEC70Y 4; ThVkCE RIM NORM W,54'45' EAST, ALUM; Tw NORTH LLYE a, inc SOU77oiIE3T aaAw R of 77 r SOUMVEST OtWTER OF SW SECMX 4, FOR A 06TANCE OFZ57-M FFFT 70 71E NORTHEAST Cf"F OF• W VIEST M F OF THE SOVTM = OWUM OF ME 527f mwEiT Oewor of SAD S£C7VN A T7f74£ mN Scum orw45' L7lST ALLaMf. TILE FAST LM OF TEE REST kOL.F OF THE SOUAOYfST OUVM7 OF 7W SOU17fMLST MAR M OF SW SECTION 4. FOR A DMAhM OF 720-67 n2T; T7ENLE RLIJ SOUTH 89O7D7' WEST PAP%LL£I WM "E SOUTH L11E OF 7W SOUTHME r CEMRMT OF S40 SEMA N 4. FM A D1615NOCE OF 55&= Fla TO 7HE POW of iEWMr, CMrA MHO 76. 123 AtnQ M'wE OR LESS _ PAMLLR ?MH 7W M ThV2VCE RUN SOUTH E 1.04 ACRC MORE- OR EXHIBIT •A7 6 0 #r M 13 PN91i REMM GKUIR CONTY QUrr UUM EM xr ra F'V MS 9MMAM DE® Do cuted this 31st day of Octdxw, A.D. 1989, by ROYCE DOC . BVZU p JIL, hasinefter called the Grant.cr, to CDUZ R C[nRPtIY, a INT. pclitkld mWivisia: of the State of Florida, uhase post -office address is IND 3301 "Mimi Trail Past, Naples, Florida 33%2, hereinafter callers the OX PH se: (f mmovet' used herein the "Grantor" and "GUantes" include all the patties to this instilment and the heirs, legal representatives and assigns of individuals, and the suooeaeors and assigns of cotpozations. ) WPlNESSZM: That the Granrtor, for and in consideration of the Sum of C3 o $1.00 in �Srd paid by the said Grantee, the receipt whereof is hereby aclanoirledd", ° does hereby release, the Grantee _ . remiss, and quitclaim unto said foe,stner interest, C 4P- right, title, claim and demand which the said CD co Granntorw -.its and to the following descr'bed lot, piece or parcel of land situate, l and being in collier Cbtmty, Florida, to it: � w `r • 3 44+; SEE JffT1WI6 fIIffi'P "A", attached hereto and made a part hereof ti Said lards are NOT homestead Property 4 Subject to easel nIs, restrictions, and reservations of record. TO HAVE AND TO HDLD same togetber with all and singular the 7 0 tieresnto be7la U q or in anywise appertaining, r.:xs all the 1s — estate, right, title, intkt6bir, i:en, equity and claim whatsoever of the said m o Via*=, either in law or ecf,,tad.:„the only proper use, benefit and behoof of C= the said Grantee forever., >! IN WITNESS WHERBOP, the sad has signed and sealers these presents the day and year first above written.t received $ ., ../< - a 3'DdE QF 'sr �:�•�ed $ �----0++►0 rtirent�r. S.arj-,P Tax COUNTY 7C�PetFsn _r Tax -" COJ LERK OF CO� JC �c he foregoing Quitclaim Deed was admowledged before me by O. WITNESS ay hand official well. ir. the County and State last aforesaid this 31-�- day of < < A.D. 1989. / `�, • .. 1?ublic Ennis P. - µCroCo,iinEsquire *1 pion Expires: h 00ioe of e untY Aa0rn9ymn m Fl UW- STAT[ OF FLOM& Ea iam1 'ram ■T C�IHISSION rai'�Ku: hur. ill. isi3. 339e2M'M[O LIMY wJ1Y7.�lLlC YMOtMiI"7Ml (813) 774-8400 001483 OR BOOK 801607 PADE Hft Monies & Associales, kr- rvon / ftvm / Surveyors MMA File #88.10" November 7, 19M Shoot I of 2 P'"aty Desorwon A WM 14t wide strip of land for additional rIght.-of-way of Devil Boulevard being nxwe 0401 lfiMi*)CIescribed as folidws: The NoftftMfeet of the South 135M feet of the Wed half of the Southwest quarter of the i quarter of Section 4, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, 'XXCEPT the West 60.00 feet therefrom. ve f6i&-vatwes " r6ATk-;tkww of rw"d. SIGNED MONM & ASSOCIATES. INC. BY P." #4175"- A. Selifler State of F116 0 M ibm 9L Sam PC am on Mpg" rL a 0020400 Mxpqntaw* 0 GM2* Pandw" Cowt R" *Am M me 0001-M4 Rkx 00 at-IM MM AbWnmft 9MM Dwft No' - FL 33M 0MOMOM FAX 0" 9W MV n0 f 483 Be1608 Mu r" & Aea<,aa%*4 k w. 80s I Pbmws / Suveyors HMA File +IM.10" November 7, 1980 Sheet 1 of 2 Pf"Ut>< DOMAPtIon A 401 'Root wide sMlp of land for additional right-of-way,of Santa Barbera Boulevard belQ¢ nl110"', ocularly deem lbed as followw The It, jest of the west 100.00 feet Of the west half of the Southwest quarter of the Sold _ �rtsr of Section 4, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, � - Flcridm,, JEXCEPT the South 135.00 test therefrom. Sublect to gi ant reservations or reetrlctlaw of rw--Ord. SIGNED 11/07/1 , ,Ff� MONTES b ASSOCIATES, INC. BY /, P."04175 A. Se er State of Fla. 0 M teen at 80WA on so Isis Haft FL INEW 0020489 Mx Mq namn ❑ eat A.rs.rw con Fort *AM FL MM LAX F00401-M '(�bLUR G011NjV. FLOMCA )AM 5 C f�LES. CLO W :aeift so. FL 33W Shoppes at Santa Barbara MPUD (PL20200002233) N Location Map W E =1 '' — -- S MPUD , ._...■■ BOUNDARY :t A SUBJECT PROPERTY ' lit - � r ' - � 4 w� © GradyMinor Civil Engineers • Land Surveyors • Planners • Landscape Architects 180 Feet JMB TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING, INC. TRAFFIC/TRANSP❑RTATI❑N ENGINEERING & PLANNING SERVICES Traffic Impact Statement The Shoppes at Santa Barbara PUD Land Use Amendment (Collier County, Florida) February 16, 2021 Revised May 25, 2021 County TIS Review Fees TIS Methodology Review Fee = $500.00 TIS (Major Study) Review Fee=$1,500.00 Prepared by: JMB TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING, INC. 4711 7TH AVENUE SW NAPLES, FL❑RIDA 341 1 9 CERTIFICATE ❑F AUTH❑RIZATI❑N No. 27B30 (PROJECT No. 200514) JAM FLD i It OHO P i /maySION TABLE OF CONTENTS Conclusions 2 Methodology 2 Scope of Project 3 Table A - Proposed Land Use 3 Figure 1 - Project Location & E+C Road Classification 3.1 Master Concept Plan 3.2 Project Generated Traffic 4 Table B - Net New Trips Generated 4 Table lA - Approved Land Use Trips Computations 4.1 Table 1B - Proposed Amendment Trips Computations 4.2 Existing + Committed Road Network 5 Project Traffic Distribution 5 Area of Significant Impact 5 Figure 2 - Project Traffic Distribution 5.1 Table 2 - Area of Impact/Road Classification 5.2 2020 thru 2025 Project Build -out Traffic Conditions 6 Table 3 - 2020 and 2025 Link Volumes 6.1 Table 4 - 2025 Link Volumes/Capacity Analysis 6.2 Appendix 7 1 Conclusions It was determined that the proposed amendment to The Shoppes at Santa Barbara PUD will not result in more site -generated trips than the PUD's previously allowed trips cap. More specifically, the Collier County Planning Commission and the Board of County Commissioners established The Shoppes at Santa Barbara PUD entitlements as 150,000 s.f. of mixed -use commercial/retail land uses and it is estimated that the PUD's trips cap is 550 net new PM peak hour two-way trips. If the proposed amendment is approved and developed with 242 multi -family dwelling units, then a substantial portion of the allowed 150,000 s.f. of commercial land uses will be displaced and the total site -generated trips will not exceed the previously approved trips cap of 550 two-way PM peak hour trips. Furthermore, it is concluded that the project's potential PM peak hour off -site impacts will remain the same or will be less. Methodology On February 10, 2021, a Traffic Impact Statement (TIS) Methodology Report was submitted to the office of Collier County Transportation Planning Department. The $500.00 methodology meeting fee will be paid at the time of submitting the zoning application. A copy of the approved TIS methodology has been provided in the appendix (refer to pages M1 thru M10). 2 Scope of Project The Shoppes at Santa Barbara is an existing PUD that is approved for the development of 150,000 s.f. of mixed retail/office floor space. To date, only one (1) outparcel has been developed with a gas-n-convenience store, which is exclusive to the PUD's development rights of 150,000 s.f. of commercial land uses. The Shoppes at Santa Barbara is located on the northeast corner of Davis Boulevard and Santa Barbara Boulevard within Collier County. It is proposed to amend the PUD to allow 242 multi -family dwelling units to be constructed, and if developed, will displace the potential to develop a substantial portion of the allowed 150,000 s.f. of commercial land uses. Table A Proposed Land Use Changes. Land Use Approved Proposed Net Change Multi -Family 0 d.u.'s 242 d.u.'s (+) 242 d.u.'s Commercial Retail 150,000 s.f. No Change No Change 3 115 I I ♦ Devonshire Blv� I --------------------U-00� Radio Road Davis Boulevard ard -- —I'II ——/— >/rn-_ I aQOf 7COO.� U arL------------------Davis Boulev— I �— r i I NORTH I N.T.S. _> m U O p N NO 3 Y m ' I p J , O o O I A � m C I O m p � p I C (n ' I O U � ' I I `Ri p Rattlesnake Hammock ----------- 'Y 'r%LEGEND i 6-LANE ARTERIAL 4-LANE ARTERIAL/COLLECTOR — — — — — 2-LANE ARTERIAL 2-LANE COLLECTOR/LOCAL RAIL ROAD J♦VRTnA—=G =RTATION EN GIN CEIi1N G, fIVG. 01 °I > O O I T� o J � I 7 I U� The Shoppes at Santa Barbara February 10, 2021 Project Location & I Roadway Classification FIGURE 1 3.1 III III 1)I 111 I I III III III III III III III ICI ill ICI III III SANTA BARBARA BLVD. ROW (OR BOOK 1141 PAGE 1114) I I III III III III III III III III I I D Z D D Z7 W 00 0 c r m D 0 BEMBRIDGE EMS COMPLEX RPUD AND CFPUD ACCESS EASEMENT, WATER MANAGEMENT N AND GNFRD STATION #75 �60' CROSS EASEMENT — — — — (OR 1483, PG 1619) LLL���111 0 20 SCALE:: 1 " = 200' WHEN PLOTTED @ 8.5" X 11" POTENTIAL VEHICULAR 20' WIDE TYPED' i I I AND/OR PEDESTRIAN LANDSCAPE BUFFER i i INTERCONNECTION NO BUFFER REQUIRED I I I NEW HOPE MPUD ADJACENT TO NEW I - PRESERVE HOPE MPUD PRESERVE it i UU �F 60' DRAINAGE EASEMENT OR 1483, PG 1619) MIXED USE TO BE VACATED OR MODIFIED 20' WIDE TYPE 'D' LANDSCAPE BUFFER (SEE NOTE #2) 20' WIDE TYPE 'D' LANDSCAPE BUFFER (SEE NOTE #2) C L� DAVIS BOULEVARD s- NEW HOPE MPUD MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL PROPOSED 40' DRAINAGE EASEMENT PROJECT BOUNDARY DAVIS BLVD. ROW (OR BOOK 1141 PAGE 1114) -- ®�--------------- - LEGEND: I (MU) MIXED USE - COMMERCIAL AND/OR RESIDENTIAL (C) COMMERCIAL ® DEVIATION (SEE NOTE SHEET) © THE YFIOPPA'S' AT SANTA DARDARA MPUD Q. cr°a fi°°r and nss°rimrs, e.: JOB cope: GradyMinor aenovi:: nrrer ztomcr sari°rrs, fa°nan s+ta+ EXHIBIT A nnre:s�� Civil Engineers Lana surveyors Planners . Landscape Architects MASTER PLAN ®°°"W '°' FILE E AME: Gn. or n°m. ex OWI513i fert.. nL\a0,. L8 fA03151 E­m­r.c zuosozss REVISED: 05/25/2021 =s•-x -s� Runi[a Springs: 1:+9.947.1114 ni„v.Gru<l,,Ninrrr. crrrn Fbrt \lyers: 239.690: 19a0 SHEET 1 OF 2 3.2, Project Generated Traffic Trips that can be expected to be generated by The Shoppes at Santa Barbara PUD for the "approved" and "proposed amendment " land uses were estimated based upon the guidelines established by the Institute of Transportation Engineers, Trip Generation Manual, 10'' Edition. That is, historical traffic data collected at similar land uses was relied upon in estimating the project's traffic. It was concluded that land use codes Multi -Family (LUC 220) and Shopping Center (LUC 820) were most appropriate in estimating the proposed and the approved land uses, respectively Table B Approved Land Use Trips vs. Proposed Land Use Trips PM Peak Hour Land Use (vph) Approved Land Uses 550 (150,000 Retail) (see Table IA) Proposed Amendment Land Uses 130 (242 Multi -Family Units) (see Table 1 B) Net Change None As determined, the proposed amendment will not result in any additional "net new" PM peak hour trips above what was previously approved by the Collier County Planning Commission and Board of County Commissioners. More specifically, if the proposed amendment is approved and developed with 242 multi -family dwelling units, then a substantial portion of the allowed 150,000 s.f. of commercial land uses will be displaced and the total site -generated trips will not exceed the previously approved trips cap of 550 two-way PM peak hour trips. Furthermore, it is concluded that the project's potential PM peak hour off -site impacts will remain the same or will be less. Therefore, no further analysis is needed at this time. However, at the time of acquiring final development approval, an assessment of the project's off -site impacts will need to performed in order to ensure that any transportation -related deficiencies caused by the project are mitigated. 0 TABLE 1A TRIP GENERATION COMPUTATIONS The Shoppes at Santa Barbara PUD Amendment APPROVED LAND USES Land Use Code Land Use Description 820 Shopping Center LUC 820 Daily Traffic (ADT) = AM Peak Hour (vph) _ PM Peak Hour (vph) = Pass -by Trips per Collier County = New Daily Traffic (ADT) = New AM Peak Hour (vph) _ New PM Peak Hour (vph) = Build Schedule 150,000 s.f. Ln(T) = 0.68Ln(X)+5.57 = T = 0.5(X)+151.78= 62% Enter/ 38% Exit = Ln(T) = 0.74Ln(X)+2.89 = 48% Enter/ 52% Exit = (ADT) x (% of New Trips) (AM) x (% of New Trips) 62% Enter/ 38% Exit = (PM) x (% of New Trips) 7,921 ADT 227 vph 141 / 86 vph 734 vph 352 / 381 vph 25% Pass -by Rate 5,941 ADT 170 vph 105 / 65 vph 550 vph 264 / 286 vph 41 PROPOSED AMENDMENT Land Use Code Land Use Description 220 Multi -Family Code Trip Period LUC 220 Daily Traffic (ADT) _ AM Peak Hour = PM Peak Hour = TABLE 113 TRIP GENERATION COMPUTATIONS The Shoppes at Santa Barbara PUD Build Schedule 242 Units Trip Generation Equation T = 7.56(X) - 40.86 = Ln(T) = 0.95Ln(X)-0.51 = 23% Enter/ 77% Exit = Ln(T) = 0.89Ln(X)-0.02 = 63% Enter/ 37% Exit = Total Trips Trips Enter/Exit 1,789 ADT 110 vph 25 / 85 vph 130 vph 82 / 48 vph Existing + Committed Road Network Figure 1 and Table 2 provide a detail of the surrounding E + C road network. Table 2 depicts the minimum level of service performance standards and capacity for the roads within the project's area of influence. Santa Barbra Boulevard Santa Barbara Boulevard varies from a four -lane to a six -lane major arterial that has a north/south orientation between its southern terminus at its intersection with Rattlesnake Hammock Road and its northern terminus at its intersection with Green Boulevard where the roadway continues north to Immokalee Road and is known as Logan Boulevard. Between Golden Gate Boulevard and Rattlesnake Hammock Road, Santa Barbara Boulevard is classified as a six -lane divided arterial having a maximum service capacity of 3,100 vphpd. Within proximity of the site, the posted speed limit of Santa Barbara Boulevard is 45 MPH. Davis Boulevard Davis Boulevard varies from a four -lane to a six -lane divided arterial that has an east/west orientation between its eastern terminus at its intersection with C.R. 951 and its western terminus at its intersection with U.S. 41. Rattlesnake Hammock Road Rattlesnake Hammock Road varies from a four -lane to a six -lane divided arterial that has an east/west orientation between its eastern terminus that extends past its intersection with C.R. 951 and its western terminus at its intersection with U.S. 41. Project Generated Traffic Distribution The project's net new traffic was distributed to the surrounding road network based upon logical means of ingress/egress, current and future traffic patterns in the area, nearby businesses, and recreational features, as well as growth trends for the surrounding areas. Table 2 and Figure 2 provide a detail of the traffic distributions to the adjacent road network. Figure 3 depicts the site -generated turning movements at the project's access on Santa Barbara Boulevard for AM and PM peak hours. Area of Significant Impact The area of significant impact was determined based upon Collier County's 2%, 2% and 3% criteria (i.e., if the project's traffic is 2% or more of a roadway's adopted level of service capacity, then the project has a significant impact upon that link). Table 2 describes the project traffic distributions and the level of impact on the surrounding roadways. Roads that were identified as being within the projects area impact are shown in Table 2. 5 1 5 • 1 0 ♦ I �n N I Devonshire Blvd Radio Road i-1 / Davis Boulevard _-_—+ ---~-------------- — %4000 p oa) 2 a° c U III /— IIII ° U 2Davis Boulevard— 3 ( I Oil NORTH m I0 0 3 ° Y ' I J O 0 a 0: ' I C L O m p � > N ' C 0 ° O 0] IU O O m S C I O I ' Y I Rattlesnake Hammock ` '�—___—__—___ oy% LEGEND _♦► Of 0%- PROJECT TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION BY PERCENT JMTRAN$PORTATION ENGINEERING, INC. The Shoppes at Santa Barbara February 10, 2021 ­4 -4- sg I I rn ° f oof 0` O f T� o C C I Uf U ( I Project -Generated I FIGURE 2 Traffic Distribution Project Traffic Peak Direction (vphpd) = 286 Exiting Project Traffic Non -Peak Direction (vph) = 264 Entering 13.0 Davis Boulevard Airport Rd to Lakewood 14.0 Lakewood to County Barn 15.0 County Barn to Santa Barbara 16.1 Santa Barbara to Radio Rd 16.2 Radio Rd to C.R 951 70.0 Radio Road Livingston to Santa Barabara 71.0 Santa Barbara to Davis Blvd 74.0 Rattlesnake Ham. County Barn to Santa Barbara 75.0 Santa Barbara to C.R. 951 76.0 Santa Barbara Blvd Green to Golden Gate Pkwy 77.0 Golden Gate Pkwy to Radio Rd 78.0 Radio Rd to Davis Blvd 79.0 Davis to Rattlesnake 10.0 County Barn Road Rattlesnake to Davis Blvd TABLE 2 PROJECT'S AREA OF IMPACT LOS Service Project Project PK Dir. PK Direction Project Pk Hr Project Pk Hr Project Road Serv. Vol. Volume Traffic PK Dir Pk Hr Non-PK Dir Non -Pk Impact Percent Significant Class LOS v h d % Dist v h d Pk Dir v h DiR Standard Impact Impact 4D D 2000 20% 57 W 53 E 3% 2.86% NO 41) D 2000 25% 72 W 66 E 2% 3.58% YES 4D D 2200 30% 86 W 79 E 2% 3.90% YES 6D E 3300 10% 29 E 26 W 2% 0.87% NO 6D E 3300 7% 20 E 18 W 2% 0.61% NO 41) D 1800 10% 29 W 26 W 2% 1.59% NO 4D D 1800 5% 14 E 13 W 2% 0.79% NO 4D D 1900 8% 23 W 21 E 3% 1.20% NO 6D D 2900 5% 14 E 13 E 3% 0.49% NO 4D D 2100 15% 43 S 40 N 3% 2.04% NO 6D E 3100 25% 72 S 66 N 2% 2.31% YES 6D E 3100 40% 114 S 106 N 2% 3.69% YES 6D E 3100 20% 57 S 53 N 2% 1.85% NO 2U D 900 5% 14 N 13 S 3% 1.59% NO 2020 thru 2025 Project Build -out Traffic Conditions In order to establish 2020 thru 2025 project build -out traffic conditions, two forecasting methods were used. The first traffic forecasting method was the County's traffic count data was adjusted for peak season conditions, peak hour conditions, peak direction, and an annual growth rate was then applied. The peak season/peak hour/peak direction and annual growth rates were derived from the 2020 Collier County AUIR Report. Using the annual growth rate, the 2025 background traffic conditions were determined, which are depicted in Table 3. The second traffic forecasting method was to add the vested trips (trip bank) identified in the 2020 AUIR report to the adjusted peak season, peak hour and peak direction traffic counts. The vested trips "+" 2025 background traffic volumes are depicted in Table 3. The greater of the two values produced by the two forecasting procedures was then considered to reflect the 2025 background traffic. The net new project generated traffic was then added to the background traffic. Table 4 provides a summary of the 2020 thru 2025 traffic conditions and the roadways' level of service and remaining available capacity. As shown, all project impacted roadways will continue to operate at the County's adopted minimum level of service thresholds at project build -out. r 14.0 15.0 16.1 16.2 76.0 77.0 78.0 79.0 TABLE 3 2020 & 2025 ROADWAY LINK VOLUMES 2020 Growth AUIR AUIR Rate Traffic Pk per vhd DiR AUIR Davis Boulevard Lakewood to County Barn 1500 E 2.00% County Barn to Santa Barbara 1420 E 2.00% Santa Barbara to Radio Rd 810 E 2.00% Radio Rd to CA 951 1290 W 2.00% Santa Barbara Blvd Green to Golden Gate Pkwy 1590 N 2.00% Golden Gate Pkwy to Radio Rd 2240 N 3.57% Radio Rd to Davis Blvd 1480 N 3.76% Davis to Rattlesnake 940 S 4.00 % Per Vested Trips Methc Per Growth Rate Method 2025 2025 Peak Hour Peak Hour PK Direction PK Direction Trip Background Background Bank Per Vested Trips vhd vhd v(ohod) 1656 61 1561 1668 139 1559 894 158 968 1424 325 1615 1755 0 1590 2669 54 2294 1780 255 1735 1144 252 1192 14.0 Davis Boulevard Lakewood to County Barn 15.0 County Barn to Santa Barbara 16.1 Santa Barbara to Radio Rd 162 Radio Rd to C.R 951 76.0 Santa Barbara Blvd Green to Golden Gate Pkwy 77.0 Golden Gate Pkwy to Radio R( 78.0 Radio Rd to Davis Blvd 79.0 Davis to Rattlesnake TABLE 4 2025 ROADWAY LINK VOLUME/CAPACITY ANALYSIS 2025 2026 2025 2025 2025 2020 Peak Hour Peak Hour Project Project Build -Out Serv. Vol. Build -Out Build -Out Peak Hour PK Direction Bkgd PK Direction Pk Hr Prjct Pk Hr Prjct Peak Hour Pk Hr Peak Hour Peak Hour PK Direction Background Pk Background PK Dir Pk Non-PK Dir Non -Pk PK Dir PK Dir PK Direction PK Direction vhd) LOS vhd Dir LOS vhd Dir (yph) Dir vhd vhd v/c Ratio LOS 1500 C 1656 E C 72 W 66 E 1722 2000 0.86 C 1420 C 1568 E C 86 W 79 E 1647 2200 0.75 C 810 B 968 E B 29 E 26 W 997 3300 0.30 B 1290 B 1615 W B 20 E 18 W 1633 3300 0.49 B 1590 C 1755 N C 43 S 40 N 1795 2100 0.85 C 2240 C 2669 N C 72 S 66 N 2735 3100 0.88 C 1480 C 1780 N C 114 S 106 N 1886 3100 0.61 C 940 B 1192 S B 57 S 53 N 1249 3100 0.40 e APPENDIX JMB TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING, INC. TRAFFIC/TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING & PLANNING SERVICES Traffic Impact Statement Methodology The Shoppes at Santa Barbara PUD Land Use Amendment (Collier County, Florida) February 10, 2021 County TIS Review Fees TIS Methodology Review Fee = $500.00 TIS (Major Study) Review Fee=$1,500.00 Prepared by: JMB TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING, INC. 471 1 7TH AVENUE SW NAPLES, FLORIDA 341 1 9 CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION NO. 2783❑ (PROJECT NO. 20051 4) 2-1©-Za7l JAMES IJI 10ANKS, P. E. DATE FLORID EG. No. 43860 Scope of Project The Shoppes at Santa Barbara is an existing PUD that is approved for the development of 150,000 s.f. of mixed retail/office floor space. To date, only one (1) outparcel has been developed with a gas-n-convenience store, which is exclusive to the PUD's development rights of 150,000 s.f. of commercial land uses. The Shoppes at Santa Barbara is located on the northeast corner of Davis Boulevard and Santa Barbara Boulevard within Collier County. It is proposed to amend the PUD to allow 242 multi -family dwelling units to be constructed, and if developed, will displace the potential to develop a substantial portion of the allowed 150,000 s.f. of commercial land uses. Table A Proposed Land Use Changes Land Use Approved Proposed Net Change Multi -Family 0 d.u.'s 242 d.u.'s (+) 242 d.u.'s Commercial Retail 150,000 s.f. No Change No Change rnz Project Generated Traffic Trips that can be expected to be generated by The Shoppes at Santa Barbara PUD for the "approved" and "proposed amendment " land uses were estimated based upon the guidelines established by the Institute of Transportation Engineers, Trip Generation Manual, 10t' Edition. That is, historical traffic data collected at similar land uses was relied upon in estimating the project's traffic. It was concluded that land use codes Multi -Family (LUC 220) and Shopping Center (LUC 820) were most appropriate in estimating the proposed and the approved land uses, respectively Table B Approved Land Use Trips vs. Proposed Land Use Trips PM Peak Hour Land Use (vph) Approved Land Uses 550 (150,000 Retail) (see Table IA) Proposed Amendment Land Uses 130 (242 Multi -Family Units) (see Table IB) Net Change None As determined, the proposed amendment will not result in any additional "net new" PM peak hour trips above what was previously approved by the Collier County Planning Commission and Board of County Commissioners. More specifically, if the proposed amendment is approved and developed with 242 multi -family dwelling units, then substantial portion of the allowed 150,000 s.f. of commercial land uses will be displaced and the total site -generated trips will not exceed the previously approved trips cap of 550 two-way PM peak hour trips. Furthermore, it is concluded that the project's potential PM peak hour off -site impacts will remain the same or will be less. Therefore, no further analysis is needed at this time. However, at the time of acquiring final development approval, an assessment of the project's off -site impacts will need to performed in order to ensure that any transportation -related deficiencies caused by the project are mitigated. 2 1A3 115 I ` Devonshire Blvd Radio Road Davis�------------------------ — lI a 00 7 O U / O U Davis Boule vard ( I .____________________ __ __r�-._ i I NORTH I IN.T.S. I m o I O O O > � 7 I Y m I O J O a O O O O M C O C O Im I I 3 O U I I �R> 3 I 0 I Rattlesnake Hammock `i----------- e / oIV �05% lex-'LEGEND / 6-LANE ARTERIAL 4-LANE ARTERIAL/COLLECTOR — — — — — 2-LANE ARTERIAL 2-LANE COLLECTOR/LOCAL RAIL ROAD �- TRAIV .9PO RTATION EfVGi"ccnlyduq ir4u. m' >I -a o OI 0 J I 3 cI �I The Shoppes at Santa Barbara February 10, 2021 Project Location & I Roadway Classification FIGURE 1 M4 TABLE 1A TRIP GENERATION COMPUTATIONS The Shoppes at Santa Barbara PUD Amendment APPROVED LAND USES Land Use Code Land Use Description 820 Shopping Center LUC 820 Daily Traffic (ADT) = AM Peak Hour (vph) _ PM Peak Hour (vph) = Pass -by Trips per Collier County = New Daily Traffic (ADT) = New AM Peak Hour (vph) _ New PM Peak Hour (vph) = Build Schedule 150,000 s.f. Ln(T) = 0.68Ln(X)+5.57 = T = 0.5(X)+151.78= 62% Enter/ 38% Exit = Ln(T) = 0.74Ln(X)+2.89 = 48% Enter/ 52% Exit = (ADT) x (% of New Trips) (AM) x (% of New Trips) 62% Enter/ 38% Exit = (PM) x (% of New Trips) 7,921 ADT 227 vph 141 / 86 vph 734 vph 352 / 381 vph 25% Pass -by Rate 5,941 ADT 170 vph 105 / 65 vph 550 vph 264 / 286 vph PROPOSED AMENDMENT Land Use Code Land Use Description 220 Multi -Family Code Trip Period LUC 220 Daily Traffic (ADT) _ AM Peak Hour = PM Peak Hour = TABLE 1B TRIP GENERATION COMPUTATIONS The Shoppes at Santa Barbara PUD Build Schedule 242 Units Trip Generation Equation T = 7.56(X) - 40.86 = Ln(T) = 0.95Ln(X)-0.51 = 23% Enter/ 77% Exit = Ln(T) = 0.89Ln(X)-0.02 = 63% Enter/ 37% Exit = Total Trips Trips Enter/Exit 1,789 ADT 110 vph 25 / 85 vph 130 vph 82 / 48 vph A (a ♦` ♦ 5- I _11 f •� I � IN Devonshire Blv� Radio Road 1j- Q%► / �� Davis Boulevard 4000, II 00C �I 0 U 6,o s y C / 25% Davis Boulevard - - 30, I ._____________ i of N I NORTH m I I 0 0 3 No I I O O O E m � o � c N >I O a U 0 O ml I 0 ml I �! C; 0 to o Rattlesnake Hammock LEGEND �► 0�. PROJECT TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION BY PERCENT w TR-'1"Mr'ORTA_r10" MNOINMMKINE5, IIVG. The Shoppes at Santa Barbara February 10, 2021 _0 l 0 0 o Of N O C I �I O' "I Project -Generated I FIGURE 2 Traffic Distribution M-1 Project Traffic Peak Direction (vphpd) = 286 Exiting Project Traffic Non -Peak Direction (vph) = 264 Entering 13.0 Davis Boulevard Airport Rd to Lakewood 14.0 Lakewood to County Barn 15.0 County Barn to Santa Barbara 16.1 Santa Barbara to Radio Rd 16.2 Radio Rd to C.R 951 70.0 Radio Road Livingston to Santa Barabara 71.0 Santa Barbara to Davis Blvd 74.0 Rattlesnake Ham. County Barn to Santa Barbara 75.0 Santa Barbara to C.R. 951 76.0 Santa Barbara Blvd Green to Golden Gate Pkwy 77.0 Golden Gate Pkwy to Radio Rd 7&0 Radio Rd to Davis Blvd 79.0 Davis to Rattlesnake 10.0 County Barn Road Rattlesnake to Davis Blvd .w TABLE 2 PROJECT'S AREA OF IMPACT LOS Service Project Project PK Dir. PK Direction Project Pk Hr Project Pk Hr Project Road Serv. Vol. Volume Traffic PK Dir Pk Hr Non-PK Dir Non -Pk Impact Percent Significant Class LOS v h d % Dist. (vphpd) Pk Dir (vph) DiR Standard Impact Impact 4D D 2000 20% 57 W 53 E 3% 2.86% NO 4D D 2000 25% 72 W 66 E 2% 3.58% YES 4D D 2200 30% 86 W 79 E 2% 3.90% YES 6D E 3300 10% 29 E 26 W 2% 0.87% NO 6D E 3300 7% 20 E 18 W 2% 0.61% NO 4D D 1800 10% 29 W 26 W 2% 1.59% NO 4D D 1800 5% 14 E 13 W 2% 0.79% NO 4D D 1900 8% 23 W 21 E 3% 1.20% NO 6D D 2900 5% 14 E 13 E 3% 0.49% NO 4D D 2100 15% 43 S 40 N 3% 2.04% NO 6D E 3100 25% 72 S 66 N 2% 2.31% YES 6D E 3100 40% 114 S 106 N 2% 3.69% YES 6D E 3100 20% 57 S 53 N 2% 1.85% NO 2U D 900 5% 14 N 13 S 3% 1.59% NO 14.0 15.0 16.1 16.2 76.0 77.0 78.0 79.0 3 TABLE 3 2020 & 2025 ROADWAY LINK VOLUMES 2020 Growth AUIR AUIR Rate Traffic Pk per v( Dhpol DiR AUIR Davis Boulevard Lakewood to County Barn 1500 E 2.00% County Barn to Santa Barbara 1420 E 2.00% Santa Barbara to Radio Rd 810 E 2.00% Radio Rd to C.R 951 1290 W 2.00% Santa Barbara Blvd Green to Golden Gate Pkwy 1590 N 2.00% Golden Gate Pkwy to Radio Rd 2240 N 3.57% Radio Rd to Davis Blvd 1480 N 3.76% Davis to Rattlesnake 940 S 4.00% Per Vested Trips Methc Per Growth Rate Method 2025 2025 Peak Hour Peak Hour PK Direction PK Direction Trip Background Background Bank Per Vested Trips v( phpd) vl ohodl v( Phpd) 1656 61 1561 1568 139 1559 894 158 968 1424 325 1615 1756 0 1590 2669 54 2294 1780 255 1735 1144 252 1192 TABLE 4 2025 ROADWAY LINK VOLUME/CAPACITY ANALYSIS 2025 2025 2025 2025 2025 2020 Peak Hour Peak Hour Project Project Build -Out Serv. Vol. Build -Out Build -Out Peak Hour PK Direction Bkgd PK Direction Pk Hr Prjct Pk Hr Prjct Peak Hour Pk Hr Peak Hour Peak Hour PK Direction Background Pk Background PK Dir Pk Non-PK Dir Non -Pk PK Dir PK Dir PK Direction PK Direction v( phpd) LOS (vDhDd) Dir LOS (vphpd) Dir (vph) Dir v h d (vphpd) v!c Ratio LOS 14.0 Davis Boulevard Lakewood to County Barn 1500 C 1656 E C 72 W 66 E 1722 2000 0.86 C 15.0 County Barn to Santa Barbara 1420 C 1568 E C 86 W 79 E 1647 2200 0.75 C 16.1 Santa Barbara to Radio Rd 810 B 968 E B 29 E 26 W 997 3300 0.30 B 16.2 Radio Rd to C.R 951 1290 B 1615 W B 20 E 18 W 1633 3300 0.49 B 76.0 Santa Barbara Blvd Green to Golden Gate Pkwy 1590 C 1755 N C 43 S 40 N 1795 2100 0.85 C 77.0 Golden Gate Pkwy to Radio Ri 2240 C 2669 N C 72 S 66 N 2735 3100 0.88 C 78.0 Radio Rd to Davis Blvd 1480 C 1780 N C 114 S 106 N 1886 3100 0.61 C 79.0 Davis to Rattlesnake 940 B 1192 S B 57 S 53 N 1249 3100 0.40 B 3 a .Strict School q ICoilier Cov Collier County School District School Impact Analysis Application Instructions: Submit one copy of completed application and location map for each new residential project requiring a determination of school impact to the Planning Department of the applicable local government. This application will not be deemed complete until all applicable submittal requirements have been submitted. Please be advised that additional documentation/information may be requested during the review process. For information regarding this application process, please contact the Facilities Management Department at 239-377-0267. Please check [4] type of application request (one only): F-JSchooI Capacity Review Exemption Letter FV-lConcurrency Determination 0 Concurrency Determination Amendment For descriptions of the types of review please see page 3, I. Project Information: Project Name: Shoppes at Santa Berbera Puo Municipality: Copier county Parcel ID#: (attach separate sheet for multiple parcels): 00400244107 Location/Address of subject property: 4670 Santa Barbara Boulevard (Attach location map) Closest Major Intersection: Santa Barbara Boulevard and Davis Boulevard - II. Ownership/Agent Information: Owner/Contract Purchaser Name(s): Alt -an Development Company Agent/Contact Person: D Wayne Arnold, AICP (Please note that if agent or contact information is completed the District will forward all information to that person) Mailing address: Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A., 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, FL 34134 Telephone#: 239,947.1144 Fax: Email wamold@gradymmor corn I hereby certify the statements �lnd/or information contained in this application with any attachments submitted herewith are true and c r t to t e best of my knowledge. Agent Signature III. Development Information October 29, 2020 Date Project Data Unit Types defined on page 2 of application MF Current Land Use Designation: Commercial Proposed Land Use Designation: Mixed Use Current zoning: Shoppes at Santa Barbara CPUD Proposed Zoning: Shoppes at Santa Barbara MPUD Project Acreage: 18.1+/-- Unit Type: SF MF MH C G Total Units Currently Allowed by Type: 0 0 0 0 0 Total Units Proposed by Type: 0 256 0 0 0 Is this a phasedproject: Yes or No If yes, please complete page 2 of this application. Date/time stamp:___ Worksheet is required to be completed by the Applicant only if the project is to be phased: Unit Type Yrl Yr2 Yr3 Yr4 Yr5 Yr6 Yr7 Yr8 Yr9 Yr10 Yr 11-20 20+ Years SF MF MH C G Totals by Yr Grand Total Insert totals by unit type by years. Unit Types: SF = Single Family MF = Multi-Family/Apartments MH = Mobile Homes C = Condo/Co-Op G = Government EXAMPLE: Unit Type Yrl Yr2 Yr3 Yr4 Yr5 Yr6 Yr7 Yr8 Yr9 Yr10 Yr 11-20 20+ Years SF 25 25 25 25 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- MF 50 0 0 0 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- MH N/A C N/A G N/A Totals by Yr 75 25 25 25 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Grand Total Grand Total 1150 Types of Reviews: School Impact Analysis: This review should be divided into two categories: - School Capacity Review (land use and rezonings), and; - Concurrency Determinations (site plans and subdivisions). School Capacity Review is the review of a project in the land use and rezoning stage of development. It is a review of the impact of the development on school capacity and is considered long range planning. This may be a review resulting in mitigation being required. In situations where the applicant may be required to mitigate, capacity may be reserved dependent on the type of mitigation. Concurrency Determination is the review of residential site plans and subdivisions to determine whether there is available capacity. When capacity is determined to be available a School Capacity Determination Letter (SCADL) will be issued verifying available capacity to the applicant and the local government. If a project exceeds the adopted level of service standards, the applicant is afforded the option of a negotiation period that may or may not result in an executed/recorded mitigation agreement Mitigation at this stage is expressed as a Proportionate Share Mitigation Agreement. For those residential developments that may have an impact but are otherwise exempt from concurrency, an exemption letter will be prepared for the applicant upon request. For those residential developments that are determined to not have an impact, a letter of no impact will be prepared for the applicant upon request. Exemption Letter: An applicant may request an Exemption Letter as documentation for the local government. These are projects that would be exempt from school concurrency review or projects that do not impact the public schools. Exemptions from school concurrency are limited to existing single family or mobile home lots of record; amendments to previously approved site plans or plats that do not increase the number of dwelling units or change the dwelling unit type; age restricted communities with no permanent residents under the age of 18; or residential site plans or plats or amendments to site plans or plats that generate less than one student; or are authorized as a Development of Regional Impact (Chapter 380, F.S.) as of July 1, 2005. Concurrency Determination Amendment: An applicant may request an amendment to a previously issued School Concurrency Determination or to an application being processed. This review may require additional staff time beyond the initial concurrency determination review and results in a modified determination being issued. An amendment could result in a negotiation period and/or a mitigation agreement being issued or a previously approved determination being modified and reissued. Collier County Property Appraiser Property Summary Site 4670 1 Parcel No 00400244107 Address SANTA Site City NAPLES Site Zone 34104 *Disclaimer BARBARA Note BLVD Name/Address STROHL FAMILY LLC 328 BOW LINE BEND NAPLES I State I FL I Zin134103 1 ap No. Strap No Section 51304 1 000100 020 51304 1 4 Wip I Range I Acres *Estii 50 1 26 1 15.08 4 50 26 COM AT SW CNR SEC 4, N 01 DEG W 135 FT, N 89 DEG E 100 FT, N 01 DEG Legal W 196.05 FT TO POB N 01 DEG W 1064.59 FT, N 88 DEG E 557.38 FT, S 01 DEG E 1261. 67FT, S 89 DEG W 356.52 FT, N 196.05 FT, W 200 FT TO POB LESS OR 2440 ,9PG 1829 Millage Area.1 269 Sub./Condo 100 -ACREAGE HEADER Use Code 0 10 - VACANT COMMERCIAL Latest Sales History (Not all Sales are listed due to Confidentiality) Date ook-Pa a IWAmount 12/04/12 4862-612 $ 0 10/03/12 4841-3585 $ 100 02/09/05 3731-119 1 $ 4,566,000 11/01/89 1483-1617 1 $ 3,511,000 Millage Rates O *Calculations School Other Total 5.016 1 6.4786 11.4946 2020 Preliminary Tax Roll (Subiect to Chanae) Land Value $ 3,284,487 (+) Improved Value $ 0 (_) Market Value $ 3,284,487 (_) Assessed Value $ 3,284,487 (_) School Taxable Value M $ 3,284,487 (_) Taxable Value $ 3,284,487 If all Values shown above equal 0 this parcel was created after the Final Tax Roll Collier County Property Appraiser Property Aerial Site 4670 1 A ANT Parcel No 00400244107 Address SSA ARA Site City NAPLES Site Zone *Note 34104 *Disclaimer BLVD Open GIS in a New Window with More Features. The Shoppes at Santa Barbara MPUD (PL20200002233) Deviation Justification 1. Deviation #1 seeks relief from LDC Section 4.05.04 G., "Spaces required. Table 17. Parking Space Requirements." Multi -family Dwellings, which requires where small-scale recreation facilities are accessory to a single-family or multifamily project and intended only for the residents of that project, exclusive of golf courses/clubhouses, the recreation facilities may be computed at 50 percent of normal requirements where the majority of the dwelling units are not within 300 feet of the recreation facilities and at 25 percent of normal requirements where the majority of the dwelling units are within 300 feet of the recreation facilities. However, any recreation facility shall have a minimum of 2 spaces exclusive of parking spaces for dwelling units, to instead allow parking for all amenities to be calculated at 1 space per 500 square feet of enclosed clubhouse facilities. Justification: The applicant is proposing a multi -family development option for the parent property located within the MPUD. The multi -family project would include a private clubhouse for the residents to use on the property. Due to confusion on parking requirements for Multi- family clubhouses a Staff Clarification was issued under SC 2005-02. In SC 2005-02, Multi -family Dwellings are required to calculate their clubhouse parking per the requirements of LDC Section 4.05.04 Table 17 for "Golf Course." It was also determined in SC 2005-02 that multi -family clubhouses were not allowed to take a 50 percent reduction from the parking requirements for clubhouses that is a reduction granted for other recreational facilities within multi -family communities. The multi- family development project has been designed to provide pedestrian interconnectivity between the commercial and residential uses along with additional parking areas along the access road. The requested parking deviation is consistent with redevelopment projects and with other residential projects that have private clubhouses. The clubhouse and primary residential amenities will be located central to most of the residential units. The exhibit shown below identifies the schematic layout for the residential development option. Seven of the eight buildings are located within 250 feet of the amenity area. Internal sidewalks and pedestrian pathways will provide access for community residents. The proposed parking standard would provide for thirteen parking spaces for the amenity site, which is adequate for the proposed 242-unit community. The residential project will provide a minimum of 480 parking spaces. A conceptual site plan for the residential development option is attached. July 16, 2021 W Gradyil+linor Page 1 of 3 ADBZSDP Deviation Justification-r2.docx Civil Fnginccrs • Land Surveyors • Planners • Landscape Architects Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, FL 34134 • 239-947-1144 • engineering@gradyminoncom • www.gradyminor.com 2. Deviation #2 seeks relief from LDC Section 4.06.02 C., "Table 2.4 Table of Buffer Requirements by Land Use Classifications", which requires each development type to provide a 15 foot wide type 'B' buffer where residential and commercial are adjacent to each other to instead allow a shared 15-foot wide type 'B' landscape buffer between commercial and residential tracts with each property contributing 7.5 feet. Justification: The residential option plan and commercial development will be developed cooperatively, and a shared type'B' buffer is acceptable to the residential developer as a buffer between the two uses. This is similar to that for buffer areas between commercial outparcels located within a shopping center, similar commercial development may have a shared buffer 15 feet wide with each abutting property contributing 7.5 feet. 3. Deviation #3 seeks relief from LDC Section 4.06.02 C., "Table 2.4 Table of Buffer Requirements by Land Use Classifications", which requires a 10 foot wide type 'A' landscape buffer if developed with multi -family residential along the eastern PUD boundary to instead allow a 5 foot wide landscape buffer with a single row hedge planted on the slope of the berm along the eastern PUD boundary south of the New Hope Ministries PUD preserve area, if a mixed use project including residential dwellings is developed on the Mixed Use Tract. The single hedge shall be planted at 5 feet height and 4 foot on center and shall be a minimum of 6 feet in height and 80% opaque within one year. Justification: This deviation is warranted due to the presence of the New Hope PUD native vegetation preservation area for approximately 25% of the linear footage of the eastern property line. The remainder of the eastern property boundary will be developed with a drainage swale benefitting both The Shoppes at Santa Barbara PUD and the County owned Bembridge PUD adjacent to the north. The swale will be a 10-foot-wide maintenance path for future canal maintenance. A 5 foot wide sloped area is available to plant with a hedge that will be adequate to supplement the existing New Hope PUD buffer. The New Hope PUD has an existing landscape buffer that will adequately serve both PUDs. 4. Deviation #4 seeks relief from LDC Section 4.06.05 J., "Slope Table 4.06.05 J. and Slope Cross Section 4.06.05 J.", which requires a slope ratio no steeper than 2:1 to be treated with Rip -rap or other forms of erosion and scour protection to instead allow a slope ratio of 2:1 to be treated with ground cover or grass in lieu of rip -rap for stabilization for the drainage swale along the east property line which drains offsite flow from the north. 5. Deviation #5 seeks relief from LDC Section 6.05.01 K., "Outfall ditches and open channels", which requires unless otherwise approved by the County Manager or designee pursuant to section 10.02.04 of the LDC, side slopes no steeper than four to one will be allowed. Protection against scour and erosion will be provided as required by the County Manager or designee to instead allow a side slope of 2:1 with ground cover or grass for stabilization for the drainage swale along the east property line which drains offsite flow from the north. July 16, 2021 Page 2 of 3 ADBZSDP Deviation Justification-r2.docx Justification for Deviation #4 and #5: The replacement drainage swale will be located within a 30-foot-wide drainage easement. The swale is proposed to be approximately 3.5 feet deep from finished grade with a 2:1 slope ratio (maximum depth below WSWT will be no more than 1.5-feet). This shallow swale can be maintained and stabilized with ground cover or grass and rip -rap is unnecessary in this application. The property owner association will be responsible for maintenance of this drainage swale. 6. Deviation #6 seeks relief from LDC Section 4.06.02 C., "Table 2.4 Table of Buffer Requirements by Land Use Classifications", which requires landscape buffering and screening standards within any planned unit development shall conform to the minimum buffering and screening standards of the zoning district to which it most closely resembles which would require a 10 foot wide type "A" landscape buffer between mixed use developments, to instead allow no buffer along the northern PUD boundary. Justification: This deviation is warranted as the Bembridge PUD owned by Collier County to the north of the subject PUD has been developed with an EMS facility and water management lake that has an established buffer along the southern lake boundary and the EMS site of the Bembridge PUD which is sufficient to buffer each project. Further, a 60 foot public ingress easement exists partially on each PUD and will be utilized for emergency access to the properties. July 16, 2021 Page 3 of 3 ADBZSDP Deviation Justification-r2.docx ORDINANCE NO. 98- 22 0 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE 89-62 THE DEOPPES AT S ELOPMENT(PUD)NTA BBYBPLANNEDARA I P PROVIDINGFOR:;. ONE AMENDMENTS TO GENERAL SUBSECTION OF GENERAL DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS SECTION; SECTION TWO, AMENDENTS TO USES PERMITTED T A SUBSECTION OF GENERAL DEVELOPMENT s � • REGULATIONS SUBSECTION; SECTION THREE, -n AMENDMENTS TO DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS r SUBSECTION OF GENERAL DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS SECTION; AND BY PROVIDING FOR AN f"t1 EFFECTIVE DATE. s Q a � ca m cn WHEREAS, on December 12, 1989, the Board of County Commissioners approved Ordinance Number 89-62, which approved the Shoppes at Santa Barbara Planned Unit Development (PUD); and WHEREAS, Bruce Tyson, AICP of Wilson, Miller, Barton 6 Peek, Inc., representing Shoppes at Santa Barbara, Inc., petitioned the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida to amend Ordinance Number 89-62, as set forth below: NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED, by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida: SECTION ONE: AMENDMENTS TO GENERAL SUBSECTION OF GENERAL DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS SECTION Subsection 4.2 entitled "General" of Section IV entitled "General Development Regulations" of the Shoppes at Santa Barbara PUD (Ordinance No. 89-62), as amended), is hereby amended to read as follows: 4.2. GENERAL Where specific standards pertaining to such things as signage and landscaping are not specifically included in this document, the applicable standards of the Collier County Oeninq Grdinanee and subdivision regulatiens Land Development Code that are in effect at the time of permit application shall apply. SECTION TWO: AMENDMENTS TO USES PERMITED SUBSECTION OF GENERAL DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS SECTION Subparagraphs 1, 3, 6, 11, 13, 15, 16 and 22 of Paragraph A, Subsection 4.3 entitled, "Uses Permitted" of Section IV entitled, "General development Regulations" of the Shoppes at Santa Barbara PUD (Ordinance No. 89-62, as amended) is hereby amended to read as follows: Words struck through are deleted; words underlined are added. -1- 4.3. USES PERMITTED No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or part, for other than the following: • A. Principal Commercial Uses 1. Automobile service stations (no repair services) (in accordance with the standards of Beet}en-pro Section 2.6.28 of the Land Development Code); antique shops; appliance stores; art supply shops; automobile parts stores. 2. Bakery shops; bait and tackle shops; banks and financial institutions; barber and beauty shops; bath supply stores; bicycle sales and services; blueprint shops; bookbinders; book stores; business machine services. 3. Car washes (enclosed only); carpet and floor covering sales -which may include storage and installation; child care centers (no less than five hundred feet from an establishment selling or serving alcoholic beverages for consumption on premises unless an exemption is granted pursuant to the requirements of Mien ° (G) _f the Zoning Ordinanee Section 2.6.10 of the Land Development Code); churches and other places of worship; clothing stores; cocktail lounges (in accordance with the standards of Seetle- 8.11 of Section 2.6.10 of the Land Development Code); commercial recreation uses - indoor; commercial schools; confectionery and candy stores. 4. Delicatessens; department stores; drug stores; dry cleaning shops; dry goods stores; and drapery shops. 5. Electrical supply stores; equipment rentals including lawn mowers and power saws, which may include their repair and sale. 6. Fish market - retail only; florist shops; fraternal and seeial elube- ( in aeeerdanee-with the standards e€-meet}en 8.11 of the Zening ^-ai ^ e) • funeral homes; furniture stores; furrier shops. 7. Garden supply stores - outside display in side and rear yards; gift shops; glass and mirror sales - including storage and installation; gourmet shops. 8. Hardware stores; hat cleaning and blocking; health food stores; homes for the aged; hospitals and hospices. 9. Ice-cream; stores. 10. Jewelry stores. Words struck through are deleted; words underlined are added -2- 11. Lakindries self Beryiee enlyp I -Leather goods; legitimate theaters; liquor stores; locksmiths. 12. Marinas; markets - food; markets - meat; medical offices and clinics; millinery shops; motels and hotels; motion picture theaters; museums; music stores; mini warehouses and storage facilities; minor automobile repair work. 13. New car dealership - outside display permitted; news stores. eiq?it elubs—(-ire aeeerdanee�with .,_.`._ 14. Office - general; office supply stores. 15. Paint and wallpaper stores; pet shops; pet supply shops; photographic equipment stores; pottery stores; printing; publishing and mimeograph services shops; private ..lubs aeeerdanee with the professional offices. 16. Radio and television sales and services; radio station (offices and studios), and auxiliary transmitters and receiving equipment, but not principal transmission tower; research and design labs; rest homes; restaurants - including drive-in or fast food restaurants (in accordance with the standards of Section 2.6.10 of the Land Development Code). 17. Shoe Repair; shoe stores; shopping centers; souvenir stores; stationery stores; supermarkets and sanatoriums. 18. Tailor shops; taxidermists; tile sales - ceramic tile; tobacco shops; toy shops; tropical fish stores. 19. Upholstery shops. 20. Variety stores; vehicle rental - automobiles only; veterinarian offices and clinics - no outside kennels. 21. Watch and precision instrument repair shops. 22. Any other commercial use of professional service which is comparable in nature with the foregoing uses and which the 3ening Development Services Director determines to be compatible with the above uses. SECTION THREE: AMENDMENTS TO DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS SUBSECTION OF GENERAL DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS SECTION Paragraphs H entitled "Parking" and J entitled "Landscape Buffer" of Subsection 4.4 entitled "Development Regulations" of Section IV entitled "General Development Regulations" of the Shoppes at Santa Barbara PUD (Ordinance No. 89-62, as amended), is hereby amended to read as follows: H. Parking: The same as the standards of the Collier County Land Development Code in effect at the time of application for permits. I Words struck through are deleted; words underlined are added. 5910 J. Landscape Buffer: A ten (10) foot landscaped buffer shall be constructed along the northern section of the property south of the access road as depicted of the Conceptual PUD Master Plan. If commercial zoning is approved on the tract to the east at the time development permits are requested, the buffer shall not be required adjacent to said commercially zoned tract. Any landscaping buffer will be required in accordance with the standards of Seetlen nn Section 2.4 of the Collier County Land Development Code. OSECTION FOUR: EFFECTIVE DATE This Ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Department of State. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this a�l day of i 0.-,e -, 1998. ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK,'CLERK APP OIVED AS TO, -FORM AND LEG L SUFFICI�NCY: MARJOW E M. STUDENT ASSISTANT COUNTY ATTORNEY I/scan/Shoppas at Santa Barbara PUD • BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA sites ur s to Chair n e on)r. 's This ordinoncr `. 'h tI' Secretary of Stote's Office il.. ,3p day of7� ,1)➢� and ocknowledgement of that fill re,ceived t�hise daffy Words struck through are deleted; words underlined are added. -4- sEr d' ORDINANCE 89-67_ .` r in . U.j b; AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE 82-2, THE 0 41 �� COMPREHENSIVE ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE L, UNINCORPORATED AREA OF 'COLLIER COUNTY, f' L cL FLORIDA, BY AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING ATLAS MAP NUMBER 50-26-2 BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE HEREIN c; DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY FROM A-2 TO "PUD" PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, KNOWN AS THE SHOPPES AT SANTA BARBARA FOR RETAIL COMMERCIAL USES; FOR PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SANTA BARBARA BOULEVARD AND DAVIS BOULEVARD C014TAINING 18.1 ACRES, MORE OR LESS, LOCATED IN SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, Robert Duane of Hole, Montes and Associates, representing Laurence Mullins, Trustee (equitable owner),petitioned the Board of County Commissioners to change the -zoning classification of the herein described real property; NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida: SECTION ONE: The Zoning Classification of the herein described real property located in Section 4, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida is changed from "A-2" to "PUD", Planned Unit Development, in accordance with the PUD document attached hereto as Exhibit "A" which is incorporated herein and by reference made part hereof. The Official Zoning Atlas rap Number 50-26-2, as described in Ordinance 82-2, is hereby amended accordingly. HOK 036wE 183 rl, SECTION TWO: This Ordinance shall become effective upon receipt of notice from the Secretary of State that this Ordinance has been filed with the Secretary of State. DAATETE /-Z,iyYY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 4 � r i i • ATTEST:,\•BY: ��✓�/M—W14--7 �" J%ME$-C: G LES, CLERK BURT L. SAUNDERS, CHAIRMAN 54-0 � APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGAL SUFFICIENCY ASSISTANT COUNTY ATTORNEY R-89-4 PUD ORDINANCE This oadtrronce filed with tf» Secrotary of St e's Office aa� doy of an/ ocksowled9ement f th* NII nceked day o.wN a.t BOOK M wE 184 THE SHOPPES AT SANTA BARBARA, CONCEPTUAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT 18.1 ACRES LOCATED IN SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA HMA,FILE NO. 88.105 PREPARED BY: HOLE, MONTES & ASSOCIATES, INC. ROBERT L. DUANE, A.I.C.P. 715 TENTH STREET SOUTH NAPLES, FLORIDA 33940 BOOK 036 pAq 185 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION I STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE AND SHORT TITLE...... 1 SECTION II PROPERTY OWNERSHIP AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION..... 2 SECTION III STATEMENT OF INTENT AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION.. 3-4 SECTION IV GENERAL DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS .............. 5-9 SECTION V ENVIRONMENTAL STANDARDS ...................... 10-11 SECTION VI TRANSPORTATION REQUIREMENTS .................. 12-14 SECTION VII UTILITYREQUIREMENTS ......................... 15-19 Y. SECTION VIII WATER MANAGEMENT REQUIREMENTS ................ 20 LIST OF EXHIBITS EXHIBIT A CONCEPTUAL P.U.D. MASTER PLAN ............... EXHIBIT B CONCEPTUAL WATER MANAGEMENT .................. EXHIBIT C STATEMENT OF UNIFIED CONTROL ................ MK 036 PA,,t 186 �'. SECTION I STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE AND SHORT TITLE I. The purpose of this section is to set forth the intent of the developer to develop an 18.1 acre tract of land located in a part of Section 4, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier i County, Florida. The development of the P.U.D. will be in compliance with the planning goals and objectives of Collier County as set forth in the Comprehensive Plan for the following reasons: 1. Tho subjoct property is located in an aroa identified as '+ an Activity Center in the Comprehensive Plan for Collier County. 2. Activity Centers are the preferred locations for the 1" concentration of commercial and mixed use development it activities. 3. The subject tract is strategically located at the intarcaction of Davis noulovard, (Stato Road 04) and Santa Barbara Boulevard, which affords the site superior access for the placement of commercial land use activities. 4. The project shall be in compliance with all applicable County regulations including the Comprehensive Plan. 5. The project will be served by a complete range of services and utilities as approved by the County. 6. The project is compatible with adjacent land uses through the internal arrangement of structures, the placement of land use buffers, and the proposed development standards contained herein. II. This Ordinance shall be known and cited as the "Shopper at Santa Barbara Planned Unit Development Ordinance". iL BOOK 036 wi 187 V, K SECTION II PROPERTY OWNERSHIP AND LEGAL. DESCRIPTION 2.1 The subject property is currently owned by: Royce Stallings/Fee Simple Legal owner. Laurence Mullins/Contract vendee and Equitable owner. 2.2 The subject property is described as follows: LEGAL DESCRIPTION The West half of the Southwest quarter of the Southwest quarter of Section 4, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, LESS the Westerly 60 feet thereof for Santa Barbara Boulevard and LESS the Southerly 75 feet thereof for State Road 84 (Davis Boulevard). q 600K 036 w,188 si Y Vim; y 4� ,f4 • � j� SECTION III STATEMENT OF INTENT AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION ;j 3.1 INTRODUCTION It is the developers intent to establish a commercial center to meet community wide shopping needs. It in the purpose of this document to set forth flexible guidelines for the future development of the project that meet accepted planning principles and practices and implement the Comprehensive Land Use Plan. 3.2 PLAN APPROVAL The location of land uses are shown on the Conceptual PUD Master Plan. Changes and variations in building location and the mix of land uses shall be permitted via Site Development Plan approval in accordance with Section 10.5 of the Zoning Ordinance. Changes and variations in building tracts may be permitted during Site Development Plan approval if, at the discretion of the County }tanager, or his designee, such changes and variations are in conformance with the substantive and procedural requirements of the Subdivision Regulations. However, this shall not be construed to require an amendment to any plat of this development unless such change or variance results in a change of lot lines on the plat. �I 3.3 LAND USES The location of land uses is shown on the Conceptual P.U.D. Master Plan. The maximum number of square feet of retail or office floor area to be permitted not including that permitted on the out parcels shall be one hundred fifty thousand (150,000) square feet of floor area. 3.4 SITE CLEARING AND DRAINAGE Clearing, grading, earthwork, and site drainage work shall be Al performed in accordance with applicable Collier County Codes and Ordinances, and the standards and commitments of this document. 3.5 EASEMENTS FOR UTILITIES Easements, where required, shall be provided for water management areas, utilities and other purposes as may be needed. .' :. Y BOOK 036,lu 189 1� 6 kA ' All necessary easements, dedications, or other instruments shall be granted to insure the continued operation and maintenance of all services and utilities in compliance with applicable regulations in effect at the time approvals are requested. 4 BOOK 036 `A 190 y �L. SECTION IV GENERAL DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS 4.1 PURPOSE 3 �4 The purpose of this section is to delineate the development regulations that accompany the Conceptual Master Plan depicted in Exhibit A. Where specific standards pertaining to such things as signage and landscaping are not specifically included in this document, the applicable standards of the Collier County Zoning Ordinance and subdivision regulations that are in effect at the time of permit application shall apply. 4.3 USES PERMITTED No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or part, for other than the following: A. Principal Commercial Uses 1. Automobile service stations (in accordance with the standards of Section 9.8 of the Zoning Ordinance); antique shops; appliance stores; art studios; art supply shops; automobile parts stores. 2. Bakery shops; bait and tackle shops; banks and financial institutions; barber and beauty shops; bath supply stores; bicycle sales and services; blueprint shops; bookbinders; book stores; business machine services. 3. Car washes; carpet and floor covering sales - which may include storage and installation; child care centers (no less than five hundred feet from an establishment selling or serving alcoholic beverages for consumption on premises unless an exemption is granted pursuant to the requirements of Section 8.11.(C) of the Zoning Ordinance; churches and other places of worship; clothing stores; cocktail lounges (in accordance with the standards of Section 8.11 of the Zoning Ordinance); commercial recreation uses - indoor; commercial schools; confectionery and candy stores. �i TX 4. Delicatessens; department stores; drug stores; dry cleaning shops; dry gcod stores; and drapery shops. 5. Electrical supply stores; equipment rentals including lawn mowers and power saws, which may include their repair and sale. 6. Fish market - retail only; florist shops; fraternal and social clubs (in accordance with the standards of Section 8.11 of the Zoning Ordinance); funeral homes; furniture stores; furrier shops. 7. Garden supply stores - outside display in side and rear yards; gift shops; glass and mirror sales - including storage and installation; gourmet shops. 8. Hardware stores; hat cleaning and blocking; health food stores; homes for the aged; hospitals and hospices. 9. Ice cream; stores. 10. Jewelry stores. 11. Laundries - self service only; leather goods; legitimate theatres; liquor stores; locksmiths. 12. Marinas; markets - food; markets - meat; medical offices and clinics; millinery shops; motels and hotels; motion picture theatres; museums; music stores; mini warehouses and storage facilities; minor automobile repair work. 13. New car dealerships - outside display permitted; news stores; night clubs (in accordance with the standards of Section 8.11 of the Zoning Ordinance). 14. Office - general; office supply stores. 15. Paint and wallpaper stores; pet shops; pet supply shops; photographic equipment stores; pottery stores; printing; publishing and mimeograph services shops; private clubs (in accordance with the standards of Section 8.11 of the Zoning Ordinance); professional offices. 16. Radio and television sales and services; radio station (offices and studios), and auxiliary transmitters and receiving equipment, but not principal transmission tower; research and design labs; rest homes; restaurants - including drive-in 11 aOOK 036 Fait 192 tz' or fast food restaurants (in accordance with the standards of Section 8.11 of the Zoning Ordinance). 17. Shoe repair; shoe stores; shopping centers; souvenir stores; stationery stores; supermarkets and sanatoriums. 18. Tailor shops; taxidermists; tile sales - ceramic tile; tobacco shops; toy shops; tropical fish stores. e; 19. Upholstery shops. 20. Variety stores; vehicle rental - automobiles only; veterinarian offices and clinics - no outside kennels. 21. Watch and precision instrument repair shops. 22. Any other commercial use or professional service which is comparable in nature with the foregoing uses and which the Zoning Director determines to be compatible with the above uses. C. Accessory Uses 1. Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with permitted uses in this district including essential services. 4.4 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS; A. Minimum Site Area; Twenty thousand (20,000) square feet. B. MSIIimIgn, Site Width: One hundred and fifty (150) feet. C. Minimum Distance Between Principal Structures: Twenty (20) feet. D. Minimum Setbacks Out Parcels: 1. Principal Structures (a) Front: Fifty (50) feet (b) Side: Twenty (20) feet (c) Rear: Twenty (20) feet 7 BOOK 036►A.E 193 2. Accessory structure (including canopies) (a) Front: Fifty (50) feet y` (b) Sides Ten (10) feet (c) Rear: Ten (10) feet (d) Minimum distance between structures: Ten (10) feet. E. Minimum Setbacks For Structures Not Located In Out ; Parc�lsss 1. Shopping Center: (a) Davis Boulevard Future Right -Of -Way: Seventy- five (75) feet. (b) Northerly Access Road Right -Of -Way: Fifty (50) feet. (c) Santa Barbara Boulevard: Seventy-five (75) feet. (d) East Property Line: Seventy-five (75) feet. (e) From Out Parcel Boundary: One half (1/2) the sum of building heights. 2. Out Buildings: (a) Santa Barbara Boulevard: Seventy-five (75) feet, however, buildings less than five thousand (5,000) square feet may have a forty (40) foot setback. (b) Davis Boulevard Future Right -Of -Way: Seventy- five (75) feet. (c) tortherly Access Road Right -Of -Way: Fifty (50) feet. (d) East Property Line: Seventy-five (75) feet. (e) From Out Parcel Boundary: Zero (0) or five (5) feet. 3. Accessory Structures: (a) Street Frontages: Fifty (50) feet. 'S (b) from Out Parcel Boundary: Zero (0) or five (5) /-, feet. (c) Minimum Distance Between Structures Ten (10) feet. F. Minimum Site Width: ;• One hundred and fifty (150) feet. �f. G. Maximum Heiclht of Structure: 8 100K 036w-194 Sixty (60) feet. N, H. Parking: The same as the standards of the Collier County Zoning ;. Ordinance in effect at the time of application for permits. I. Open Space and Landscaped Area: A minimum of 301 of the property shall be maintained as open space for which a credit is provided for dedicated areas, landscaped areas and retention areas. J. Lsandocaye Buffert A ten (10) foot landscaped buffer shall be constructed along the northern section of the property south of the access road as depicted on the Conceptual PUD Master Plan. If commercial zoning is approved on the tract to the east at the time development permits are requested, the buffer shall not be required adjacent to said commercially zoned tract. Any landscaping buffer will be required in accordance with the standards of Section 8.37 of the Collier County Zoning Ordinance. X. Minimum Floor Area Principal Structure: One thousand (1,000) square feet with the exception of automobile service stations which may be nine hundred (900) square feet. 9 036 195 SECTION V ENVIRONMENTAL STANDARDS 5.1 PURPOSE The purpose of this Section is to set forth the stipulations established of the Environmental Advisory Council. The development this project shall be subject to these stipulations: A. Petitioner shall be subject to Ordinance 75-21 (or the tree/vegetation removal ordinance in existence at the time of permitting), requiring the acquisition of a tree removal permit prior to any land clearing. A site clearing plan shall be submitted to the Natural Resources Management Department for their review and subject to approval prior to any work on the situ. This plan may be submitted in phases to coincide with the development schedule. The site clearing plan shall clearly depict how the final site layout incorporates retained native vegetation to the maximum extent possible and how roads, buildings, lakes, parking lots, and other facilities have been oriented to accommodate this goal. S. Native species shall be utilized, as described below, in the site landscaping plan. A landscape plan for all landscaping on the development shall be submitted to the County Landscape Architect and to a County Environmental Specialist for their review and shall be subject to their approval. The landscape design shall incorporate a minimum of 60% native plants, by number, including trees, shrubs, and ground cover. At least 60% of the trees, 601 of the shrubs, and 60% of the groundcover shall be native species. At the discretion of the County Landscape Architect or County Environmental Specialist a higher percentage of trees or shrubs can offset an equal percentage of groundcover. For example, the use of 70• native trees could allow the use of only 50% native groundcover. This plan shall depict the incorporation of native species and their mix with other species, if any. The goal of site landscaping shall be the re- creation of native vegetation and habitat characteristics lost on the site during construction or due to past activities. C. All exotic plants, as defined in the County Code, shall be removed during each phase of construction from development areas, open space areas, and preserve areas. Following nito devolopment, n mnintonance program shall be implemented to prevent reinvasion of the site by such 10 soon 036 w 196 exotic species. This plan, which will describe control techniques and inspection intervals, shall be filed with and subject to approval by the Natural Resources Management Department and the Community Development Division. D. If, during the course of site clearing, excavation, or other constructional activities, an archaeological or historical site, artifact, or other indicator is discovered, all development at that location shall be immediately stopped and the Natural Resources Management Department notified. Development will be suspended for a sufficient length of time to enable the Natural Resources Management Department or a designated consultant to assess the find and determine the proper courso of action in regard to its salvageability. The Natural Resources Management Department will respond to any such notification in a timely and efficient manner so as to provide only a minimal interruption to any construction activities. 11 BCOK 036 -, r,197 f �• SECTION VI TRANSPORTATION REQUIREMENTS The purpose of this Section is to set forth the traffic improvement requirements which the project developer must undertake as an integral part of the project development. These developments consist of the following: A. The developer shall provide 40 feet of road right-of-way along Santa Barbara Boulevard. B. The developer shall provide right turn lanai at each entrance along Santa Barbara Boulevard, but the lanes shall not be continuous between entrances. C. The access on Davis Boulevard shall be limited to right turns in and right turns out. It shall have no median opening upon the multi-laning of that road. D. The developer shall provide a fair share contribution toward the costs of reconstructing the existing median opening on Santa Barbara Boulevard to serve the project's main entrance. E. The developer shall provide a fair share contribution toward the capital cost of traffic signals at accesses on Santa Barbara Boulevard when deemed warranted by the County. The signals shall be owned, operated and maintained by Collier County. P. The developer shall provide arterial level street lighting at all project entrances. G. If a future median opening is permitted on Santa Barbara Boulevard to serve a joint -use entrance at the northern boundary of the project, the benefiting property owners shall be responsible for the construction costs of the opening and all associated turn lanes. H. These improvements are considered "site related" 'as defined in Ordinance 85-55 and shall not be applied as credits toward any impact fees required by that ordinance. 12 100K 036 PA7 19° I. One access point is shown on the Conceptual P.U.D. Master Plan at the southern end of the property to provide access to the parcel to the east. An additional access point, at the northern boundary of the property, may be included on the Subdivision Master Plan. At the time of the Subdivision Master Plan/final plat petitions either one or both of these access points may be required by the County staff. J. The travel way cross section shall conform to the construction for a minor collector in terms of pavement thickness in accordance with the County Subdivision Ordinance. R. The minimum travel way width shall be twenty-four (24) feet. L. Design and construction of all improvements shall be subject to compliance with the appropriate provisions of the Collier County Subdivision Regulations. M. Work within Collier County right-of-way shall meet the requirements of Collier County Right -of -Way Ordinance 82- 91. N. The project shall be platted in accordance with Collier County Subdivision Regulations to define the right-of- way, out parcels, and easements as shown on the Master Plan. 0. The two access points to the property north of the Shoppes at Santa Barbara are understood to be conceptual and will not be constructed at this time. Actual locations will be determined during the rezoning and/or subdivision master plan review of this land to the north. P. Payment of $35,000 based upon prior right-of-way acquisition (1.82 acres @ $11,000/acre) of $20,000 and prior median opening/driveway of $15,000; payment to be made and applied to the S.R. 84 four-laning project upon start of construction contract for S.R. 84 segment between Santa Barbara Boulevard and County Barn Road. Q. Payment of road impact fees consistent with the proposed fee structure and/or revisions to the ordinance as -may be approved. 13 BOOK 036 PA',! 199 �� a R. No Certificate of Occupancy to be issued until substantial road construction completion of S.R. 84 four- laning between Santa Barbara Boulevard and County Barn Road. S. Payment of fair share contribution toward the four-laning of S.R. 84/Davie Boulevard east of Santa Barbara Boulevard based on generated -attracted new trips divided by FDOT four -lane road capacity times the cost of road improvements along project's frontage on S.R. 84. Payment to be made and applied to the S.R. 84 four-laning project upon start of construction contract for S.R. 84 segment between Santa Barbara Boulevard and County Barn Road. 14 BOOK 036 vA ;E 200 ;-r SECTION VII UTILITY REQUIREMENTS The purpose of this Section is to set forth the utilities requirements which must be accommodated by the project developer. 1. Water distribution and sewage collection and transmission systems will be constructed throughout the project development by the developer pursuant to all current requirements of Collier County and the State of Florida. Water and sewer facilities constructed within platted rights -of -way or within utility easements required by the County shall be conveyed to the County for ownership, operation and maintenance purposes pursuant to appropriate County Ordinances and regulations in effect at the time of conveyance. All water and sewer facilities constructed on private property and not required by the County to be located within utility easements shall be owned, operated and maintained by the developer, his assigns or successors. Upon completion of construction of the water and sewer facilities within the project, the facilities will be tested to ensure they meet Collier County's utility construction requirements in effect at the time construction plans are approved. The above tasks must be completed to the satisfaction of the Utilities Division prior to placing any utility facilities, County owned or privately owned, into service. Upon completion of the water and/or sewer facilities and prior to the issuance of Certificates of Occupancy for structures within the project the utility facilities shall be conveyed to the County, when required by the Utilities Division, pursuant to County Ordinances and Regulations in effect at the time conveyance is requested. 2. All construction plans and technical specifications and proposed plats, if applicable, for the proposed water distribution and sewage collection and transmission facilities must be reviewed and approved by the utilities Division prior to commencement of construction. 15 600K 036 PA'•F 201 M ;> 3. All customers connecting to the water distribution and sewage collection facilities will be customers of the County and will be billed by the County in accordance with the County's established rates. Should the County not be in a position to provide water and/or sower service to the project, the water and/or sewer customers shall be customers of the interim utility established to serve the project until the County's off -site water and/or sewer facilities are available to serve the project. 4. It is anticipated that the County Utilities Division will ultimately supply potable water to meet the consumptive demand and/or receive and treat the sewage generated by this project. Should the County system not be in a position to supply potable water to the project and/or receive the project's wastewater at the time development commences, the Developer, at his expense, will install and operate interim water supply and on -site sewage treatment and disposal facilities adequate to meet all requirements of the appropriate regulatory agencies. 5. An agreement shall be entered into between the County and the developer, binding on the developer, his assigns or successors, legally acceptable to the County, prior to the approval of construction documents for the proposed project, stating that: a. The proposed water supply and on -site treatment facilities and/or on -site wastewater treatment and disposal facilities, if required, are to be constructed as part of the proposed project and must be regarded as interim; they shall be constructed to State and Federal standards and are to be owned, operated and maintained by the developer, his assigns or successors, until such time as the County's off -site water facilities and/or off -site sewer facilities are available to service the project. The interim treatment facilities shall supply services only to those lands owned by the developer and approved by the County for development. The utility facility(ies) may not be expanded to provide water and/or sewer service outside the development boundary approved by the County without the written consent of the County. b. Upon connection to the County's off -site water facilities, and/or sewer facilities, the developer, his assigns or successors shall abLndon, dismantle and remove from the site the 16 1, Qoo� 036202 y interim water and/or sewage treatment facility and discontinue use of the water supply source, .•., if applicable, in a manner consistent with State of Florida standards. All work related r with this activity shall be performed at no cost to the County. C. Connection to the County's off -site water and/or sewer facilities will be made by the owners, their assigns or successors, at no cost to the County within 90 days after such facilities become available. The cost of connection shall include, but not be limited to, all engineering design and preparation of construction documents, permitting, modification or refitting of sewage pumping facilities, interconnection with County off - site facilities water and/or sewer lines nocossary to mako tho connoction(s), etc. d. At the time County off -site water and/or sewer facilities are available for the project to connect with, the following water and/or sewer facilities shall be conveyed to the County pursuant to appropriate County Ordinances and Regulations in effect at the time: (1) All water rrd/or sewer facilities constructed in publicly owned rights -of - way or within utility easements required by the County within the project limits will be required to make connection with the County's off -site water and/or sewer facilities; or, (2) All water and sewer facilities required to connect the project to the County's off -site water and/or sewer facilities when the on -site water and/or sewer facilities are constructed on private property and not required by the County to be located within utility easements, including but not limited to the following: (a) Main sewage lift station and force main interconnecting with the County sewer facilities including all utility easoments necessary. 17 BOOK Oaf WS 2 (b) water distribution facilities from the point of connection with the County's water facilities to the master water meter serving the project, including all utility easements necessary. e. The customers served on an interim basis by the utility system constructed by the developer shall become customers of the County at the time when County off -site water and/or sewer facilities are available to serve the project and such connection is made. Prior to connection of the project to the County's off - site water and/or sewer facilities the developer, his assigns or successors, shall turn over to tha County a complete list of the customers served by the interim utilities system and shall not compete with the County for the service of those customers. The developer shall also provide the County with a detailed inventory of the facilities served within the project and the entity which will be responsible for the water and/or sewer service billing for the project. f. All construction plans and technical specifications related to connections to the County's off -site water and/or sewer facilities will be submitted to the Utilities Division for review and approval prior to commencement of construction. g- The developer, his assigns or successors, agree to pay all system development charges at the time that building permits are required, pursuant to appropriate County Ordinances and Regulations in effect at the time of permit request. This requirement shall be made known to all prospective buyers of properties for which building permits will be required prior to the start of building construction. h. The County will lease to the Developer for operation and maintenance the water distribution and/or sewage collection and transmission system for the sum of $10.00 per year, when such system is not connected to the off -site water and/or sewer facilities owned and operated by the County. Terms of the leaso shall be determined upon completion of the proposed utility construction and prior to 18 100K 036 PA,! 204 '. . {;. activation of the water supplyy treatment and distribution facilities and/or the sewage collection, transmission and treatment facilities. The lease, if required, shall remain in effect until the County can provide water and/or sewer service through its off -site facilities or until such time that bulk rate water and/or sewer service agreements are negotiated with the interim utility system serving the project. : B. Data required under County Ordinance No. 80-112 showing the availability of sewage service must be submitted and approved by the Utilities Division prior to approval of the construction documents for the project. A copy of the approved DER permits must be submitted for the sewage collection and transmission systems and the wastewater treatment facility to be utilized, upon receipt thereof. C. If an interim on -sits water supply, treatment and transmission facility is utilized to serve the proposed project, it must be properly sized to supply average and peak day domestic demand, in addition to fire flow demand at a rate approved by the appropriate Fire Control District servicing the project area. D. Construction and ownership of the water and sewer facilities, including any proposed interim sewage treatment and disposal facility, shall be in compliance with all Utilities Division standards, policies, ordinances, etc., in effect at the time construction approval is requested. E. Detailed hydraulic design reports covering the water distribution and sewage collection and transmission systems to serve the project must be submitted with the construction documents for the project. Tha reports shall list all design assumptions, demand rates and other' factors pertinent to the system under consideration. F. Site Development Plan approval shall not be permitted until the extension of sewer service, however, Lot 1 and 2 may be permitted a septic tank on an interim basis subject to compliance with Chapter 10-D.6, F.A.C., should development occur prior to the extension of sewer service. 19 BOOK 036 FI-.t 205 v SECTION VIII WATER MANAGEMENT REQUIREMENTS 8.1 PURPOSE The purpose of this Section is to set forth the stipulations established by the Water Management Advisory Board, which '•: stipulations shall be accommodated by the project developer. A. Petitioner shall provide sixty (60) feet of right-of-way along the entire frontage of Davis Boulevard for future canal widening. B. Detailed paving, grading and site drainage plans shall be submitted to Project Review Services for review. No construction permits shall be issued unless and until approval of the proposed const niction in accordance with the submitted plans is granted by Project Review Services. C. Construction of all water management facilities shall be subject to compliance with the appropriate provisions of the Collier Count Subdivision Regulations. D. An Excavation Permit will be required for the proposed lake(s) in accordance with Collier County Ordinance No. 88-26. E. A copy of SFWMD Permit or Early Work Permit is required prior to construction plan approval. 'rs F. A master association will be responsible for the operation and maintenance of on -site drainage facilities. 20 BOOK 036 nu 206 M I Zal fill t a ♦ ............ pill '2� E5 sco( MzZ7 > ON C ! n I11 M / 1111 1 1 1 ' III n o / ill 1011111111011 h I 11411 1 I14 h h�'� I III II h IIIII 411I 11 d � I IIIII II III h _ IIIIII III 4 h ` IIIII I) ll J1_ ! II IlII4{1I11 4lniur 41111 dd 11 �Ir 1 I WIII II411 �1: 4tlll IIt411 41 nun glll II it N 111 14111 1 1411 Irl I ,pII I �1 ;♦ nl III it Irr r, I If 111 If 41IIIII 141 .� 4rtui 41 �� k1111 III I IIIIII I) hl � II III 41 41 "f � I tL '- •' I 1 1 am WMANAPO (1.. s.) im 036 PA,=. 8 J E."1317 C STATEMEIT OF UNI7I30 CONTROL. It is Ghe intent of the Shoepes of Santa Barbara POD to establish and develop a Planned Unit Development on 18.1 acres. The project is Located at the intersection of Santa Barbara and Davis Blvd. The subject lands are under unified ownership for the purpose of obtaining PUD zoning on t1he subject property. Development of this Planned Unit wiLl occur in accordance with the submitted Planned Unit Development regulations and any conditions thereof approved with the rezone petition as described and agreed to within, the PUD document. l'c2.1.J�-tom Laurence Mullins Contract Vendee and Equitable Owner BOOK 036 Pa'! 209 /•:d� STATE OF FLORIDA ) } COUNTY OF COLLIER ) t I, TAMES C. GILES, Clerk of Courts in and for the Twentieth Judicial Circuit, Collier County, Florida, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a true copy of: Ordinance No. 89-62 r' lx which was adopted by the Board of County Commissioners on the r.. 12th day of September, 1989, during Regular Session. WITNESS my hand and the official seal of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this 21st r September, 1989. JAMES C. GILES Clerk of Courts and Clerk Ex-officio to Board of count Commissioners By: Virginia Magri J, Deputy Clerk 4a.. too( `J36 F1, 210 I I e8 e$ I zoom zaaoo wo:ao e e .: m.w ,aaa eaao. b I I p I J_ I _ B Ej SANTA BARBARA BOULEVARD � /—--- __________________________ I ii I I I I I LEGEND '', ©u+avc woHom mua mMca 'S0 LAUREN;E MULLINS _.R V��/� HOLE, MONTES k ASSOCIATES P.U.D. MASTER PLAN RBA " �'��50 �tt11fa +?ittrhttrtt MAR 31 i%S EXHIBIT A 1105SPIO �2530-1 BS.105 1 o°r 2 . la uxoscr£ alma *wlcu X wArzR caxmoL smu R E T E N TIC AREA j-DRY Ireicu vs eu DRY RETENTION AREA � I II I I I I I I� , I , I µ I I , , , I � I I I I I I ra LvloscsE avrcR rnM.0 ______ �_____----------- _w ____ I _________________ SANTA BARBARA BOULEVARD _______ _ fh _ 50 II I _ a a\aavm I I I „I _ DRAINAGE LEGEND sNsr cv I I .� I n t JUNCTION BOX A A - l aA ' BDnOH SwM[ RCP OR CMP %PE v/ MITERED END SFLNON -bD-9 —.1 _ SECTION A -A RCP OR CMP PIPE w/ HEADWALL b= afFH.�xa RPE (IS' R.CP.) IREI I I OiLOW s TYPICAL DRY RETENTION /BLEED DOWN SWALE OSEC710N SECTION X—X — — BLEED DOWN SWAT£ CENTER IJNE B-B WATER CONTROL STRUCTURE DETAIL EXHIBIT B LAURENCE MULLINS "eaP. ov s B L■�/� HOLE, 0NTES &ASSOCIATES WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR Ot!<e �l�apprs At 5P«r • DSwM 2""`"` 530-2 ® CO.X rz � wnv - rwrt uvgs - aoxa wmxn xa a. m 191nN p � gp'` aam $AAIA SAebAIA AFFIDAVIT OF COMPLIANCE Petition PL20200002233, The Shoppes at Santa Barbara PUD Amendment I hereby certify that pursuant to Ordinance 2004-41, of the Collier County Land Development Code, I did cause the attached newspaper advertisement to appear and I did give notice by mail to the following property owners and/or condominium and civic associations whose members may be affected by the proposed land use changes of an application request for a rezoning, PUD amendment, or conditional use, at least 15 days prior to the scheduled Neighborhood Information Meeting. For the purposes of this requirement, the names and addresses of property owners shall be deemed those appearing on the latest tax rolls of Collier County and any other persons or entities who have made a formal request of the county to be notified. The said notice contained the laymen's description of the site property of proposed change and the date, time, and place of a Neighborhood Information Meeting. Per the attached letters, property owner's list, and copy of newspaper advertisement which are hereby made a part of this Affidavit of Compliance. Sharon enho �/as Senior Planning T for Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. State of Florida County of Lee The foregoing Affidavit of compliance was acknowledged before me this April 30 2021 by Sharon Umpenhour as Senior Planning Technician, who is personally known to me. IT, CAR1N J. DWYER (Signature of otary Publi * MY COMMISSION # GG 982367 `3•EXPIRES: May 14, 2024 Carin J. Dwyer Printed Name of Notary NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING Shoppes at Santa Barbara MPUD Amendment (PL20200002233) A Neighborhood Information Meeting hosted by D. Wayne Arnold, AICP, of Q. Grady Minor and Associates, P.A. and Richard D. Yovanovich, Esq. of Coleman, Yovanovich & Koester, P.A., representing Altman Development Company, LLC (Applicant) will be held on May 18, 2021, 5:30 pm at New Hope Ministries, 7675 Davis Blvd, Naples, FL 34104. Individuals who have questions or would like to participate remotely should contact Sharon Umpenhour, Senior Planning Technician with Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. by email: sumpenhour@gradyminor.com, phone: 239-947-1144, or mail: 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, FL 34134. Project information is posted online at www.gradyminor.com/planning. Altman Development Company, LLC submitted a formal application to Collier County, seeking approval of a Mixed Use Planned Unit Development (MPUD) Amendment. The amendment proposes to modify the previously approved permitted uses to add a maximum of 242 multi -family residential dwelling units as a development option within a 15.1± acre portion of the MPUD, add development standards for the residential dwelling units and to modify the Master Plan to designate commercial and mixed -use tracts for the project. The subject property is comprised of 15.1± acres, located on the northeast corner of Santa Barbara Boulevard and Davis Boulevard in Section 4, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. sr c m C SUBJECT WL PROPERTY {{ 4 m L v A. A CL r c�' x to a H R � = C C Davis BLVQ .� U m i cc {Martino C1R ---------- 01 r The Neighborhood Information Meeting is for informational purposes, it is not a public hearing. n,Ap IN,,. - CC «PA,.,e,elare,�ere pea,9re, olloreP�ela„tt� ro,,oa.„aa c�PAp,�xaa,la..ae Paunon: PL20200002233(PUDA) I Bxtf— soo• J Data: uvznzt 1 Site Location: Shoppas al Santa Barbara POD NAME E2Axes "N" 7 ELEVEN, INC N RYAN LLC THREE GALLERIA TOWER 13155 NOEL RD LB73 DAULAE, TA 7— .... & GIRLS CLUB OF COLL R COUNTY 7500 DAVIS BLVD "L 34_ 0 CE DAVIS LLC 185 CROSSWAYS PARK DR BURY, N 11797-0 COB wArcn w as xnoorvrvnx uro azrawa� zn sxnaiory srttzA nx vMARLEnwc as —2-3103 GEARY EILEEN DIERDRE STEVENSON 120 WEST SADDLE RIVER ROAD SADDLERILVER4.1NJ —0 unPA BM josevry auonry a - Shoppes at Santa Barbara 5-18-2021 NIM PL20200002233 Meeting Transcript Wayne: Hi. Well, good evening. I'm Wayne Arnold with Grady Minor & Associates. We're hosting the neighborhood information meeting for the Shoppes of Santa Barbara for a mixed -use project. And with us tonight, we have Sharon Umpenhour, who is recording the meeting. We have Rich Yovanovich who's our land use council. Jim Banks who is our traffic engineer, and Mike Delate who's our civil engineer working on the project. And for staff is Laura DeJohn, and Laura is the staff planner working on this application. So, we have a short PowerPoint presentation. We only have one live audience member that's not part of our team, so we're gonna make a short presentation and take questions. So, Sharon if you wanna — Laura DeJohn: Do you have some people on Zoom? Wayne: We have the applicant team on Zoom. Laura: Oh. Wayne: But no assistants. So, this is a location map. This involves the entirety of the property. That's about 18 acres that's known as the Shoppes at Santa Barbara. The only portion of that that's been constructed is the 7-Eleven at the corner of Santa Barbara and Davis Boulevard. The Altman group is under contract to purchase approximately 15 acres of the property. It's the undeveloped portion of it, and we're going through the process to create a mixed -use option for the property that would allow them to construct up to 242 multi -family apartments on the property. Right now, it's zoned commercial PUD, we'll be converting that to a mixed -use PUD to accommodate the residential units that we're asking for. It is in the activity center, so we're seeking a maximum of 16 dwelling units per acre for the property. Again, 242 multi -family units, and we're modifying the master plan to accommodate the mixed -use component for the property. Wayne: These are the approved master plans. They're not very good quality. They're older master plans, but these reflected a commercial -only option was going to be a large strip center with a couple of out parcels. And our new master plan shows a commercial tract which is where the 7-Eleven is located, and then, the rest of the property would be designated mixed -use. It accommodates 150,000 square feet of commercial uses, and the 242 dwelling units. And we're calling it a development option Shoppes at Santa Barbara 5-18-2021 NIM PL20200002233 Meeting Transcript because, for some reason, if the Altman group does not close on the property, we want the ability to retain the commercial uses. But once the residential goes, there might be room for one out parcel, we're thinking, on the property, in addition to 7-Eleven. But it would primarily become a residential project with a couple of out parcels. Wayne: So, we have described setbacks from Davis Boulevard, with 75 feet. Building heights have been approved at 60 feet previously for the commercial component. We're keeping that 60-foot height for these buildings. The buildings we're working from as a concept right now are a combination of 3 to 5 story buildings. We're asking for some deviations. So, a couple of these we're reevaluating. 7-Eleven at one time was considering to make some modifications to their site, so we were going to accommodate some buffer deviations that are required for new convenience stores. Not sure — we may be deleting those. We may be retaining them. We haven't made that decision yet. We're in the process. We've just received our first round of review comments from staff on our application in the last couple of weeks. So, we'll go through the process of responding to their questions for additional information, and then, we'll move ahead toward public hearings in the fall. Wayne: The deviation locations, for instance, there's a drainage ditch from the county property to the north that we need to accommodate on this property. We've asked for a deviation reduction on our eastern boundary, adjacent to what's now preserved and the apartment complex immediately next door to the church we're in. And we've talked to staff about that. We're looking at the opportunity to try to supplement some smaller landscape buffer within the area we have. But we're having to accommodate a larger flow of water from the country property. So, we're trying to accommodate that and a — is it a 40-foot drainage, Mike? Wayne: Thirty-foot drainage easement. Mike Delate: It's 40. Wayne: Forty -foot -wide drainage easement on the eastern side of the property. Wayne: The conceptual rendering that the Altman group has developed shows a series of the residential buildings sort of on the north portion of that property. The 7-Eleven's reflected in this plan to the Shoppes at Santa Barbara 5-18-2021 NIM PL20200002233 Meeting Transcript south along David Boulevard. We show one commercial out parcel just north of 7-Eleven, and then the balance and arrangement of buildings. The buildings closer to Santa Barbara Boulevard in that exhibit are three-story buildings I believe. Aren't they Mike? Mike: Yeah. Wayne: And the five -story buildings would be closer to the rear of the site to the eastern portion of the property. Wayne: This is an image in the lower corner of a potential clubhouse, leasing office building. All of our information is online. Sharon, does this have the other renderings in it? Wayne: No. Wayne: Okay. So, all of information can be found on GradyMinor.com/planning area of our website. Laura DeJohn probably has some business cards and can provide you with her information if you wanna directly contact the county with any questions or concerns. You all received notice. You said you lived in countryside. You all received notice of this should receive further notice when we get to the public hearing stage for the project. And we don't have public hearings set yet, but you'll the big four by eight zoning signs go up on the property when it's advertised for public hearing. You'll get a public notice from Collier County regarding the public hearing dates. Wayne: And that's really in a nutshell what we're proposing. I'd be happy to answer any questions that you may have regarding the application. Bruce Carlson: So, initially, I was under the understanding that is was gonna be a strip mall. Wayne: That is what it's zoned for today — a 150,000 square feet of commercial development. Bruce: Correct. Bruce: Yes. But there was no mention — I got down to the proportion part of the bases to find the things that they have an impact on Country side. And my discussions with zoning and planning down there Shoppes at Santa Barbara 5-18-2021 NIM PL20200002233 Meeting Transcript was, that it was a strip mall was going in, basically. This is one directly across the street that is a strip. Wayne: Yes. Bruce: There was not mention of 242 housing units. Is this something that's a new development or a new breakthrough, or? Wayne: Well, we submitted it probably 60 plus days ago to Collier Country. So, I'm not sure when the last time you were down there. But this application is a formal PUD amendment application, and we're asking to amend the existing zoning that only allows commercial to allow the residential option as well. Bruce: The five -story units? Wayne: Yes. Bruce: How many of those would be five -story? Wayne: Mike, can you tell me how many of those buildings? We have a conceptual plan that we're working with, it's not cast in stone, yet. But right now, though, just to talk about the height, the commercial buildings can be up to 60 feet in height Bruce: because that's commercial. Right? Wayne: Right, and we've left the 60 feet intact for the number we're working with for the residential component as well. Mike: Two to three. Wayne: Two to three. I'm not sure. Mike: Two to three five -story buildings. Wayne: Oh, two to three five -story buildings. I'm sorry. Bruce: Between two and three? Wayne: Yes. Wayne: Two or three. Bruce: Two or three? Shoppes at Santa Barbara 5-18-2021 NIM PL20200002233 Meeting Transcript Wayne: Five -story buildings, correct. Bruce: So, the five -story buildings would still be falling under that 60-foot Wayne: That's correct. Wayne: Yes. Speaker 2: Okay. And obviously, the three -unit buildings would be substantially lower. Is that —? Wayne: There are three stories. So, they would be two floors lower than the five -story buildings. So, the buildings that are right here are part of the New Hope campus. Those are four-story buildings. Wayne: So, just for scale. One's gonna be one floor higher, and the others would be one floor lower. Bruce: Okay. Do you have any idea what the commercial applications of that is going to be? Wayne: No, probably your typical out parcel user. I know that Mike Delate in our office has been having some conversations with different users, but I don't think there's a firm commitment. Right now, the PUD allows for a very wide variety of commercial uses. We're not asking for any changes to any of the permitted commercial uses. Bruce: And if you get all the necessary permits and signatures and okays and so forth, when would you like to start the project? Wayne: They would like to start immediately, but we have to get through the public hearing process first. We think we're probably on target to get through the process later this fall. Our desire is to get through the zoning process before the end of the year. And I think we would like to be comfortable with everything that we're proposing and with staff. And we might submit the site plans for review concurrent with our zoning application. So, they would like to start probably first quarter of 2022, I think that would be. Bruce: Do you know or have any idea when the public hearing dates are going to be? Wayne: We don't have dates yet. I'm gonna say they're going to be later in Shoppes at Santa Barbara 5-18-2021 NIM PL20200002233 Meeting Transcript the fall. I guess there's a chance our planning commission hearing could be sometime considered summer. But the Board of County Commissioners takes a recess in July and August from public hearings, typically. So, I'm gonna say it's probably going to get to the board — could be as early as October, but I would say more realistically, November. Bruce: Okay. Wayne: But again, you'll see the notice signs up. And if you wanna check in with us occasionally, we're happy to keep you up to date. Sharon's got her card here if you'd like to email her. We can send you periodic updates as we provide new information to the county. Sharon: And if you want a copy of this, because I know it's hard to see... Wayne: Yeah. Yeah, we'll be happy to give you one. This goes out with my email there. So, that would be — Sharon: Okay. Wayne: Okay, good. Bruce: Thank you. Wayne: Any other questions? Bruce: No. Wayne: Okay. Wayne: Well, good. Wayne: Well, if there's not, I guess we'll close the public meeting. Thank you for taking your time to come out and join us. [End of Audio] Duration: 11 minutes Petition PL20200002233 The Shoppes at Santa Barbara Mixed Use Planned Unit Development (MPUD) Amendment May 18, 2021 Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM) © GradyNlinor Project Team • Altman Development Company, LLC - Applicant, Contract Purchaser • D. Wayne Arnold, AICP, Professional Planner - Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. • Richard D. Yovanovich, Esq., Land Use Attorney - Coleman, Yovanovich & Koester, P.A. • Michael Delate, P.E., Civil Engineer - Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. • James M. Banks, P.E., Traffic Engineer - Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA 2 �� a • • • • • � _ b,,•' :,,:. r �- .�. � �Yi - �* �-. ' �cs`` � � F f � s is ��_ r � � V:�; f ,; _ �.. .- �„`�', F �'`� , '";' ,pro,."� r� .1�. }� _ , ti ' ., �� _ j _ � S; /// '{( P/ I� ; ( �� q ����� _ _ _ �? �rw, • _ _ �_ .. _. _ . � •�ew i#tw� a +g � -� s ' c JJ _� '�v ter. <�. _ :��;�_r-' �. ` ,`'� d � 1 ,w � .. A. Project Information Current Zoning: The Shoppes at Santa Barbara Commercial Planned Unit Development (CPUD) Proposed Zoning: The Shoppes at Santa Barbara Mixed Use Planned Unit Development (MPUD) Previous Zoning Approvals: Ordinance 89-62 and Ordinance 98-022 Existing Future Land Use Designation: Activity Center #6 Project Acreage: 18.1 +/- acres 4 Proposed Request • Add a maximum of 242 multi -family residential dwelling units. • Add development standards for the residential dwelling units. • Modify the Master Plan to designate commercial and mixed -use tracts for the project. 5 N Approved Master Plan (Ordinance 89-062) <Z Tj T ,I rj ---------- ---- - .. - ----------------------- --------- -- ----- �li�i� EXHIBIT A UUREN:E YUWNS Y.U.D. YYiIER PWI W�RI•W Y T�te�� 6- Proposed I BEMBRIDGE EMS COMPLEX RPUD AND CFPUD I ACCESS EASEMENT, WATER MANAGEMENT CJ Id I,I AND GNFRD STATION #75 op a ___ -___==__=-_ Master Plan ;; ,(-1I ca I SCALET�A I Il I a I I _200 I � I III � I i l 20 / SE WPE F LANDCAPE BUF'E II NEW HOPE MPUD I /// I PRESERVE III rn II i I li I ym I I AGE EASEMENT �I EF � DRAIN OR 168E PG 619) SITE SUMMARY I+ I Id $ � I MO TO BE VACATED OR MODIFIED � MIXED USE ' I� jj o (MU) TOTAL SITE AREA: 18.11 ACRE ; I ❑� ❑2 COUNTY ROW 2.0t ACRES I+ 2 �� NEW HOPE MPUD COMMERCIAL (C) 1.0t ACRES O II %� I ©� I�I MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL MIXED USE (MU) 15.1t ACRES _ _ II TBOOK I (OR 110i PAGE 11R1{OjW II 20' WIDE TYPE j I PROPOSED W D LANDSCAPE _ DRAINAGE EASEMENT I COMMERCIAL: MAXIMUM 150,000 S.F. I II BUFFER (SEE i WITH 10' MAINTENANCE NOTE #2) I I EASEMENT RESIDENTIAL: MAXIMUM 242 DWELLING UNITS II II mWIDE TYPE •n I I� II LANDSCAPE BUFFER I III1 II (SEE NOTE #2) I�PROJECT OPEN SPACE: IM II I II BOUNDARY I C i I REQUIRED: 30% II PROVIDED:30°k Ij1I II©❑� — PRESERVE: U (OR BOOK 1141 PAGE 1114) REQUIRED: 0± ACRES DAMS OULEVARD B PROVIDED :0±ACRES dyLZjJb� C-- - ---- _ T-------------- 7 I�LEGEND: (MU) MIXED USE - COMMERCIAL AND/OR RESIDENTIAL (C) COMMERCIAL ■ ® DEVIATION (SEE NOTE SHEET) Proposed Residential Development Standards Minimum Setbacks (principal structures): Davis Boulevard Right -Of -Way: Northerly Access Road Right -Of -Way Santa Barbara Boulevard: East Property Line: Internal Tract Boundary: Maximum Building Height: 60 feet Minimum Floor Area: 750 square feet 75 feet 50 feet 75 feet 50 feet 20 feet H. Proposed Deviations 1. From the Land Development Code (LDC) Section 4.05.04.G - "Spaces required. Table 17. Parking Space Requirements" 2. From LDC Section 4.06.02, "Table 2.4 Table of Buffer Requirements by Land Use Classifications" 3. From LDC Section 4.06.02 C., "Table 2.4 Table of Buffer Requirements by Land Use Classifications" 4. From LDC Section 4.06.05 J., "Slope Table 4.06.05 J. and Slope Cross Section 4.06.05 J. 5. From LDC Section 6.05.01.K, "Outfall ditches and open channels 6. From LDC Section 5.05.05 D.2.a, "Facilities with Fuel Pumps" 7. From LDC Section 5.05.05.D.2.b, "Facilities with Fuel Pumps" 9 . Proposed Deviation Locations I I I I Itl I� n (I� I I� I J y o D ) I� z I0 I I g �I H �� II CIII SANTA SARBARA BLVD. ROW II (OR BOON 1141 PAGE 1114)� I+ II N II I+ II I+ � I+ II Ij I —� II I II BEMBRIDGE EMS COMPLEX RPUD AND CFPUD ACCESS EASEMENT, WATER MANAGEMENT C1 AND GNFRD STATION #75 I sp ------------------— y SCALE 1-200' l- � 'ICI 20'WIDETYPE TY ; I I LANDSCAPE BUFFER I NEW HOPE MPUD I PRESERVE II I i MENT 619) �B:E(MV��CTE��MDDII MIXED USE IE MU ; I NMOMPD ©F MULTWY RESIDENTIAL 20 WIDE TYPE PROPOSED 9LANDSCAPE BUFR 1 OEASEMENT WH10'MAINTENA CE EASEMENT I J 2a wloE nPE ro i I LANDS CAPE BUFFER 1 (SEE NOTE N2) 1 I - I I I '� 1 PROJECT BOUNDARY II I 11 _ —DAVIS BLVD. ROW (OR BOOK 1141 PAGE 1114) DAVIS BOULEVARD LEGEND. (MU) MIXED USE - COMMERCL4L AND/OR RESIDENTIAL (C) COMMERCIAL 7 ® DEVIATION (SEE NOTE SHEET) 1 Conceptual MF Renderings =- - - - - - - - - -- ---------------------�--------------------a JIL ;diTTTTT� -TA BARBARA -D. PROPOSED SITE PLAN I ®} scuE ,•=�v NE. �o.AR�, aR<,�s�s.FDs.onADRESI ■■ ■ PROPOSED CLUBHOUSE RENDERINGI 11 N Conclusion Documents and information can be found online: • Gradyminor.com/Planning • Collier County GMD Public Portal: cvportal.colliergov.net/cityviewweb Next Steps Hearing sign(s) posted on property advertising Planning Commission (CCPC) and Board of County Commissioner (BCC) hearing dates. CCPC - TBD BCC - TBD Contact: • Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A.: Sharon Umpenhour, Senior Planning Technician; sumpenhour@ciradyminor.com or 239.947.1 144 extension 1249 • Collier County: Laura DeJohn, AICP; laura.dejohn@colliercountyfl.gov or 239.252.5587 12 N (CHAPTER 8, COLLIER COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE FOR LAND DEVELOPMENT) A zoning sign(s) must be posted by the petitioner or the petitioner's agent on the parcel for a minimum of fifteen (15) calendar days in advance of the first public hearing and said sign(s) must be maintained by the petitioner or the petitioner's agent through the Board of County Commissioners Hearing. Below are general guidelines for signs, however these guidelines should not be construed to supersede any requirement of the LDC. For specific sign requirements, please refer to the Administrative Code, Chapter 8 E. 1. The sign(s) must be erected in full view of the public, not more than five (5) feet from the nearest street right-of-way or easement. 2. The sign(s) must be securely affixed by nails, staples, or other means to a wood frame or to a wood panel and then fastened securely to a post, or other structure. The sign may not be affixed to a tree or other foliage. 3. The petitioner or the petitioner's agent must maintain the sign(s) in place, and readable condition until the requested action has been heard and a final decision rendered. If the sign(s) is destroyed, lost, or rendered unreadable, the petitioner or the petitioner's agent must replace the sign(s) NOTE: AFTER THE SIGN HAS BEEN POSTED, THIS AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE SHOULD BE RETURNED NO LATER THAN TEN (10) WORKING DAYS BEFORE THE FIRST HEARING DATE TO THE ASSIGNED PLANNER. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER BEFORE THE UNDERSIGNED AUTHORITY, PERSONALLY APPEARED SHARON UMPENHOUR WHO ON OATH SAYS THAT HE/SHE HAS POSTED PROPER NOTICE AS REQUIRED BY SECTION 10.03.00 OF THE COLLIER CO Y LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE ON THE PARCEL COVERED IN PETITION NUMBER(S) The SJ(oDDeat Santa Barbara P 2 200002233. 3800 Via Del Rey SIGNATURE OF AP LICANTOR AGENT STREET OR P.O. BOX Sharon Umpenhour as Senior Planning Technician for Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. NAME (TYPED OR PRINTED) STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF Lee Bonita Springs, Florida 34110 CITY, STATE ZIP The foregoing instrument was sworn to and subscribed before me this 11 day of August , 2021, by Sharon Umpenhour as Senior Planning Technician for Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A., personally known to me erIA'1110- PFE)dQEed as iden*:f:^^* ^^ and who did not take noath. U. ..�... C1tRIN J. DWYER Signature of N fqky Public MY commissm # GG 982367 P' EXPIRES: May 14, 2024 Carin J. Dwyer ,QF!; V Bonded ihm Nabuy Public Underwriters Printed Name of Notary Public My Commission Expires: (Stamp with serial number) Rev. 31412015