HEX Final Decision 2021-45ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS CHECKLIST & ROUTING SLIP
TO ACCOMPANY ALL ORIGINAL DOCUMENTS SENT TO
CLERK OF COURT'S OFFICE
COLLIER COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER
Route to Addressee(s)
(List in routing order)
Office
Initials
Date
Minutes and Records
Clerk of Court's Office
HD
10/15/21
minute5audrecord5Acollierclerk.com
PRIMARY CONTACT INFORMATION
Normally the primary contact is the person who created. prepared the Document. Primary contact information is
needed in the event there is a need for additional or missing information.
Name of Primary
Andrew Dickman, Esq.
Phone Number
Alternate Phone Number
Contact
Heather DeSanto, Paralegal
239-434-0840
239-302-2701
Hearing Examiner
9/23/21
Hearing Petition ID(s
PDI-PL20210000341
Meeting Date
Type of Document
Agenda J Decision
Number of Original
1
Attached
Back-up Documents Transcript
Documents Attached
PO number or
account number if
131-138350-649030
document is to be
recorded
INSTRUCTIONS & CHECKLIST
Use the Check Box in the Yes column or mark "N/A" in the Not
Yes
N A
Applicable column, whichever is appropriate.
1.
Does the decision amend an Ordinance? If yes, Ordinance Number Amended
is 09-03, as amended
✓
2
Other than the Hearing Examiner, documents are to be emailed to:
Diane.L%nch((icolliercount vfl. ov• Patricia.Mill �r)colliercount •fl. rov
Has the date for the Hearing Examiner's signature line been entered as the
3.
Final Decision date?
Original document has been signed.'initialed for legal sufficiency?
✓
4•
The final decision is dated 10/15/21
1 GMD\Zonmg HEMHEX Meeting Packets
HEX NO. 2021-45
HEARING EXAMINER DECISION
DATE OF HEARING.
September 23, 2021
PETITION.
PETITION NO. PDI-PL20210000341— LB Orange Blossom, LLC requests an insubstantial
change to Ordinance Number 09-03, the Savannah Place RPUD, for (1) the modification to
the PUD Master Plan to modify right-of-way and dry retention areas and the addition of a
fence/wall at all PUD boundaries; (2) the modification to the minimum front yard setback to
allow for a ten (10) foot front yard setback for single-family detached and attached dwelling
types with side -loaded garages; (3) the modification to the maximum intensity from 20 to 17
dwelling units; (4) the modification to the PUD Commitments to incorporate the County's
Managing Entity standard language, provide a timing trigger for the proportionate fair
share payment towards the Orange Blossom/Airport Pulling Road intersection
improvements, address yard tree requirements, and require a 4- to 6-foot tall fence along
specified property lines; (5) a deviation from LDC Section 6.06.01.N to allow for a 45-foot
right of- way internal private right-of-way; (6) a deviation from LDC Section 6.06.02.A to
allow a 6-foot wide side sidewalk on one side of the right-of-way; (7) a deviation from LDC
Section 4.06.02.C.2 to allow a 10-foot-wide Type B buffer along the portion of the eastern
boundary abutting the Cay Lagoon PUD; The subject property consists of 6.81 acres, located
on the south side of Orange Blossom Drive approximately % mile west of Airport -Pulling
Road (CR 31) in Section 2, Township 49 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida.
GENERAL PURPOSE FOR THE PETITION.
The Applicant is requesting changes to use this infill site more efficiently. A summary of the
proposed changes is provided:
1. The modification to the PUD Master Plan to show the slight modification to the development
layout, including modified right-of-way and dry retention area and addition of a fence/wall at all
PUD boundaries.
2. The modification to the minimum front yard setback to allow for a ten (10) foot front yard
setback for single-family detached and attached dwelling types with side -loaded garages.
3. The modification to the maximum intensity from 20 to 17 dwelling units.
4. The modification to the PUD Commitments to incorporate the County's Managing Entity
standard language and provide a timing trigger for the proportionate fair share payment towards
the Orange Blossom/Airport Pulling Road intersection improvements.
Page 1 of 9
5. A deviation from LDC Section 6.06.0l.N which establishes the minimum right-of-way width
of 60 feet to be utilized, to allow for a 45-foot right of- way internal private right-of-way.
6. A deviation from LDC Section 6.06.02.A which requires five-foot wide sidewalks to be
constructed on both sides of the local/internal rights -of -way, to allow a 6-foot-wide side sidewalk
on one side of the right-of-way.
7. A deviation from LDC Section 4.06.02.C.2 which requires Type B buffers to be fifteen feet
wide, to allow a 10-foot-wide Type B buffer along the portion of the eastern boundary abutting
the Cay Lagoon PUD.
8. The addition of a development commitment of a 4- to 6-foot-tall fence/wall will be installed
along the southern, eastern, and western property lines and part of the eastern property line, as
shown on the PUD Master Plan. 9. The addition of a development commitment of the required
yard tree for lots with sideloaded dwelling units and a 10-foot front setback shall be small trees
planted in groups of two (2) trees.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION.
Approval with conditions.
FINDINGS_
The Hearing Examiner has jurisdiction over this Petitioner pursuant to Sec. 2-87 of the Collier
County of Ordinances, Sec. 8.10.00 of the Land Development Code, and Chapter 9 of the
County Administrative Code.
2. The public hearing for this Petition was properly noticed and conducted in accordance with all
County and state requirements.
3. The public hearing was conducted electronically and in -person in accordance with
Emergency/Executive Order 2020-04.
4. The Petitioner and/or Petitioner's representative executed the Hybrid Virtual Quasi -Judicial
Public Hearing Waiver related to conducting the public hearing electronically and in -person.
5. The Petitioner and/or Petitioner's representative presented the Petition, followed by County
staff and then public comment.
6. The Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM) was held on June 8, 2021, at St. Katherine
Greek Orthodox church located at 7100 Airport -Pulling Road, Naples, Florida. There was
one commitment at the meeting which was that a fence will be on all sides of the PUD which
was incorporated into the Master Plan in Exhibit C of the PUD document.
7. This project does not require Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) review, as this project
did not meet the EAC scope of land development project reviews as identified in Section 2-
Page 2 of 9
1193 of the Collier County Codes of Laws and Ordinances. However, Environmental Services
staff recommends approval of the proposed petition.
8. The County's Land Development Code Sections 10.02.13.E.1 and 10.02.13.E.2 lists the
criteria for an insubstantial change to an approved PUD Ordinance. The Hearing Examiner
having the authority of the Planning Commission may approve a request for an insubstantial
change to an approved PUD ordinance upon review and evaluation of the criteria in the Collier
County Land Development Code.'
Section 10.02.13.E.I Criteria:
1. Is there a proposed change in the boundary of the Planned Unit Development (PUD)?
The record from the public hearing reflects that there is no proposed change in the
boundary of the PUD.
2. Is there a proposed increase in the total number of dwelling units or intensity of land use
or height of buildings within the development?
The record from the public hearing reflects that there is no proposed increase in the
number of dwelling units or intensity of land use, or height of buildings within the
development.
3. Is there a proposed decrease in preservation, conservation, recreation, or open space areas
within the development in excess of five (5) percent of the total acreage previously
designated as such, or five (5) acres in area?
The record from the public hearing reflects that there is no proposed decrease in
preservation, conservation, recreation, or open space areas within the development as
designated on the approved Master Plan.
4. Is there a proposed increase in the size of areas used for non-residential uses, to include
institutional, commercial, and industrial land uses (excluding preservation, conservation or
open space), or a proposed relocation of nonresidential land uses?
The record from the public hearing reflects that the land uses within the RPUD are limited
to residential and preserve uses. The RPUD does not contain nonresidential uses
(institutional, commercial or industrial) land uses, therefore, no change or relocation of
nonresidential land uses is proposed.
5. Is there a substantial increase in the impacts of the development which may include, but
are not limited to increases in traffic generation; changes in traffic circulation; or impacts
on other public facilities?
'The Hearing Examiner's findings are italicized.
Page 3 of 9
The record from the public hearing reflects that there are no substantial impacts resulting
from this amendment.
6. Will the change result in land use activities that generate a higher level of vehicular traffic
based upon the Trip Generation Manual published by the Institute of Transportation
Engineers?
The record from the public hearing reflects that the proposed amendment would not result
in land use activities that generate higher levels of vehicular traffic based upon the Trip
Generation Manual published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers.
7. Will the change result in a requirement for increased stormwater retention, or otherwise
increase stormwater discharge?
The record from the public hearing reflects that the proposed changes will not impact or
increase stormwater retention or increase stormwater discharge beyond the permittable
limits of the site development.
8. Will the proposed change bring about a relationship to an abutting land use that would be
incompatible with an adjacent land use?
The record from the public hearing reflects that there will be no incompatible relationships
with abutting land uses.
9. Are there any modifications to the PUD Master Plan or PUD document or amendment to a
PUD ordinance which is inconsistent with the Future Land Use Element or other elements
of the Growth Management Plan or which modification would increase the density of
intensity of the permitted land uses?
The record from the public hearing reflects that the proposed changes to the PUD
Document are consistent with the FLUE of the GMP. Both environmental and
Transportation Planning staff reviewed this petition, and no changes to the PUD Document
are proposed that would be deemed inconsistent with the CCME or the Transportation
Element of the GMP. This petition does not propose any increase in density or intensity of
the permitted land uses.
10. The proposed change is to a PUD District designated as a Development of Regional Impact
(DRI) and approved pursuant to Chapter 380.06, Florida Statues, where such change
requires a determination and public hearing by Collier County pursuant to Sec. 3 80.06 (19),
F.S. Any change that meets the criterion of Sec. 380.06 (19)(e)2., F.S., and any changes to
a DRI/PUD Master Plan that clearly do not create a substantial deviation shall be reviewed
and approved by Collier County under Section 10.02.13 of the LDC.
The record from the public hearing reflects that the subject project is not a DRI.
Page 4 of 9
11. Are there any modifications to the PUD Master Plan or PUD document or amendment to a
PUD ordinance which impact(s) any consideration deemed to be a substantial modification
as described under Section(s) 10.02.13 E.?
The record from the public hearing reflects that the proposed change is not deemed to be
substantial.
Section 10.02.13.E.2 Criteria:
1. Does this petition change the analysis of the findings and criteria used for the original
application?
The record from the public hearing reflects that the proposed changes do not affect the
original analysis and findings of the original PUD application in Petition PUDZ-2007-
AR-12026.
T)evi nti nn
Proposed Deviation #1 (Right -of -Way Width):
The petitioner is seeking a deviation from LDC Section 6.06.0l .N which establishes the minimum
right-of-way width of 60 feet to be utilized, to allow for a 45-foot right-of-way internal private
right-of-way.
Petitioner's Justification:
The reduced roadway width will provide for traffic calming and increased lot sizes, while
accommodating standard 10' wide travel lanes and appropriate infrastructure for this relatively
small residential project. The community will be developed with a maximum of 17 homes, thus
larger roadways to accommodate high traffic volumes and higher design speeds is not necessary.
The additional land area gained by the right-of-way reduction will allow for more expansive green
areas/yard space. The demand for larger yards and pool decks to maximize "outdoor living" is a
continuing industry standard that the developer is seeking to accommodate in this small, infill
community. Studies have determined that reduced right-of-way widths act as a traffic calming
feature and will assist in maintaining public health, safety, and welfare within the community.
Please also refer to the enclosed right-of-way cross section, which demonstrates how the
infrastructure can fit within the proposed width. The right-of-way will be privately maintained by
the future Homeowners Association (HOA).
The record from the public hearing reflects that similar deviations were approved with the
Buckley, Rushton Pointe, and Vincentian Village PUDs and there will be no detrimental effect if
this deviation request is approved. Zoning and Development Review staff recommends
APPROVAL of this deviation, finding that in compliance with LDC Section 10.02.13.A.3, the
petitioner has demonstrated that "the element may be waived without a detrimental effect on the
health, safety and welfare of the community, " and LDC Section 10.02.13.B.5.h, the petitioner has
Page 5 of 9
demonstrated that the deviation is `justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least
equivalent to literal application of such regulations. "
Proposed Deviation #2: (Sidewalks)
Deviation 2 seeks relief from LDC Section 6.06.02.A which requires five-foot wide sidewalks to
be constructed on both sides of the local/internal rights -of -way, to allow a 6-foot-wide side
sidewalk on one side of the right-of-way.
Petitioner's Justification
The proposed sidewalk will be located on the west side of the internal right-of-way to provide
appropriate pedestrian circulation within this small, infill community. The requirements in Section
6.06.02.A.2 allow for a sidewalk on one side of roadways where 15 or fewer dwelling units front
a right-of-way that terminates in a cul-de-sac, per below footnote:
"For development projects seeking approval of a final subdivision plat or site
development plan of 4 or fewer dwelling units per gross acre and where 15 or fewer
dwelling units front on a ROW that terminates in a cul-de-sac, then sidewalks will
only be required on one side of the ROW and not around the circumference of the
cul-de-sac."
Savannah Place is approved for a maximum of 17 units with one roadway terminating in a cul-de-
sac, thus is very close to the allowable threshold for this deviation by right. The PPL plans to be
filed concurrently further reduces the number of lots to 17, only 2 units above the limit to allow
sidewalks on one side "by right". Therefore, the deviation is generally consistent with the intent
of the code to allow for reduced pedestrian infrastructure on cul de sacs serving few units.
The record from the public hearing reflects that LDC 6.06.02.A.2. allows a development of 4 or
fewer units per acre and 15 for fewer units to only be required to provide sidewalks on one side of
the right-of-way. As the proposed development is limited to 17 units and the current Plat under
review contains 17 units staff finds the proposed deviation reasonable, meets the intent of this
section of the Land Development Code, and is recommending approval. Similar deviations were
approved with the San Marino and Collier County Resource Recovery Business Park PUDs and
as such staff sees no detrimental effect if this deviation request is approved. Zoning and
Development Review staff recommends APPROVAL of this deviation, finding that in compliance
with LDC Section 10.02.13.A.3, the petitioner has demonstrated that "the element may be waived
without a detrimental effect on the health, safety and welfare of the community, " and LDC Section
10. 02.13.B. 5. h, the petitioner has demonstrated that the deviation is `justified as meeting public
purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations. "
Proposed Deviation #3: (Type B Buffer)
Deviation 3 seeks relief from LDC Section 4.06.02.C.2 which requires Type B buffers to be fifteen
feet wide, to allow a 10-foot-wide Type B buffer along the portion of the eastern boundary abutting
Cay Lagoon PUD.
Page 6 of 9
Petitioner's Justification
A Type B buffer is required along the boundary between single-family and multi -family
developments. While Commitment 4.A of Ordinance 2009-03 explicitly allows for a 10-foot-wide
Type B buffer, this deviation is justified due to the large 25' wide Type A buffer on the boundary
with the adjacent Cay Lagoon PUD. The combined buffer area between the two properties is 35'
wide with elements of Type A and Type B buffers, whereas the LDC would require 25' total buffer
width between the communities (15' Type B and 10' Type A). The proposed single-family
residential density is much lower compared to the neighboring multifamily PUD, and thus will not
need as much buffer area to ensure compatibility between the projects. The buffer will contain all
required Type B plantings, thereby providing the appropriate screening intended by the LDC,
while the LDC required spatial separation is provided via Cay Lagoon's 25' wide Type A buffer
coupled with the proposed 10' wide Type B buffer.
The record from the public hearing reflects that similar deviations were approved with the Lords
Way, Collier 36, and San Marino PUDs and there will be no detrimental effect if this deviation
request is approved. Zoning and Development Review staff recommends APPROVAL of this
deviation, finding that in compliance with LDC Section 10.02.13.A.3, the petitioner has
demonstrated that "the element may be waived without a detrimental effect on the health, safety
and welfare of the community, " and LDC Section 10.02.13.B.5.h, the petitioner has demonstrated
that the deviation is 'Justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal
application of such regulations. "
ANAT.V�lq.
Based on a review of the record including the Petition, application, exhibits, the County's staff
report, and hearing comments and testimony from the Petitioner and/or the Petitioner's
representative(s), County staff and any given by the public, the Hearing Examiner finds that there
is enough competent, substantial evidence as applied to the criteria set forth in Sections
10.02.13.E.1 and 10.02.13.E.2 of the Land Development Code to approve Petition.
DECISION.
The Hearing Examiner hereby APPROVES Petition Number PDI-PL20210000341, filed by John
Cowart of Waldrop Engineering, P.A. representing LB Orange Blossom, LLC, with respect to the
property in the Savannah Place RPUD Ordinance No. 09-03, as amended, and described as the
south side of Orange Blossom Drive approximately % mile west of Airport -Pulling Road (CR 31)
in Section 2, Township 49 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida, for the following:
An insubstantial change to Ordinance Number 09-03, the Savannah Place RPUD, for (1) the
modification to the PUD Master Plan to show the slight modification to the development
layout, including modified right-of-way and dry retention area and addition of a fence/wall at
all PUD boundaries; (2) the modification to the minimum front yard setback to allow for a ten
(10) foot front yard setback for single-family detached and attached dwelling types with side -
loaded garages; (3) the modification to the maximum intensity from 20 to 17 dwelling units;
Page 7 of 9
(4) the modification to the PUD Commitments to incorporate the County's Managing Entity
standard language and provide a timing trigger for the proportionate fair share payment
towards the Orange Blossom/Airport Pulling Road intersection improvements; (5) a deviation
from LDC Section 6.06.0l.N which establishes the minimum right-of-way width of 60 feet to
be utilized, to allow for a 45-foot right of- way internal private right-of-way; (6) a deviation
from LDC Section 6.06.02.A which requires five foot wide sidewalks to be constructed on
both sides of the local/internal rights -of -way, to allow a 6-foot wide side sidewalk on one side
of the right-of-way; (7) a deviation from LDC Section 4.06.02.C.2 which requires Type B
buffers to be fifteen feet wide, to allow a 10-foot-wide Type B buffer along the portion of the
eastern boundary abutting the Cay Lagoon PUD; (8) the addition of a development
commitment of a 4 to 6 foot tall fence/wall will be installed along the southern, eastern, and
western property lines and part of the eastern property line, as shown on the PUD Master Plan;
(9) the addition of a development commitment of the required yard tree for lots with side -
loaded dwelling units and a 10-foot front setback shall be small trees planted in groups of two
(2) trees.
Said changes are fully described in the revised PUD document and Plans attached as Exhibit "A"
and are subject to the condition(s) set forth below.
ATTACHMENTS.
Exhibit A — Revised PUD Document and Plans
LEGAL DESCRIPTION.
See Ordinance No. 09-03, as amended, and described as the south side of Orange Blossom Drive
approximately '/2 mile west of Airport -Pulling Road (CR 31) in Section 2, Township 49 South,
Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida
CONDITIONS.
All other applicable state or federal permits must be obtained before commencement of the
development.
DISCLAIMER.
Pursuant to Section 125.022(5) F.S., issuance of a development permit by a county does not in any
way create any rights on the part of the applicant to obtain a permit from a state or federal agency
and does not create any liability on the part of the county for issuance of the permit if the applicant
fails to obtain requisite approvals or fulfill the obligations imposed by a state or federal agency or
undertakes actions that result in a violation of state or federal law.
APPEALS.
This decision becomes effective on the date it is rendered. An appeal of this decision shall be done
in accordance with applicable ordinances, codes and law.
Page 8 of 9
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AND EXHIBITS: SEE CLERK OF COURT, MINUTES
AND RECORDS DEPARTMENT. DECISIONS OF THE HEARING EXAMINER FOR
VARIANCES, CONDITIONAL USES, AND BOAT DOCK EXTENSIONS SHALL BE
NOTED ON THE ZONING MAP FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES.
Date
Andrew Dickman, Esq., AICP
Hearing Examiner
Page 9 of 9
EXHIBIT "A"
EXHIBIT A
SAVANNAH PLACE RPUD
PERMITTED USES
I. Residential Tract:
The residential tract of the Savannah Place RPUD is approximately 6. 66'+/- acres,
which are to be developed with up to 2A 1Z dwelling units and related accessory
uses.
A. Permitted Uses
No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, in whole
or in part, for other than the following:
1. Principal Uses
a. Single-family, detached dwelling units;
b. Single-family, attached dwelling units;
c. Townhouses, no greater than 140 feet in width;
d. Any other use that is comparable in nature with the foregoing list of permitted
principal uses, as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA)
according to the process described in the Land Development Code (LDC);
e. All dwelling units must be of the same type; i.e. a mixture of townhouses and
single-family detached units would not be allowed.
2. Accessory Uses
a. Garages;
b. Carports;
c. Model homes and model home centers including offices for project
administration, construction, sales and marketing;
d. Guardhouses, gatehouses and access control structures;
e. e. Community clubhouse (must be located east of the internal roadway, if
provided);
f. f. Recreation facilities, including but not limited to swimming pools, tennis
courts, playground equipment or other amenities ( must be located east of
the internal roadway, if provided, except those serving one dwelling unit);
g. g. Essential services, including but not limited to, water, sewer, cable, electric
and other utilities to serve the principal uses;
h. h. Any other use that is comparable in nature with the foregoing list of
permitted uses, as determined by the BZA according to the process
described in the LDC.
B. Development Standards
Table 1, contained in Exhibit B, sets forth the development standards for land uses within
Savannah Place RPUD- PL20210000341 Words StFWGk threegh are deleted;
Last Revised: August 13, 2021 Words underlined are added
Page 1 of 10
the Residential Tract of the Savannah Place RPUD. Standards not specifically set forth
herein shall be those specified in applicable sections of the LDC in effect as of the date
of approval of the Site Development Plan (SDP) or subdivision plat.
II. Preserve Tract
The Preserve Tract of the Savannah Place RPUD is approximately 0. 15"= acres,
which shall meet native vegetation retention requirements.
A. Permitted Uses
No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, in whole
or in part, for other than the following:
Principal Uses
a. Native vegetation preserve.
B. Development Standards
The Preserve Tract of the Savannah Place RPUD shall comply with standards contained
in applicable sections of the LDC in effect as of the date of the date of approval of the
SDP or subdivision plat.
Savannah Place RPUD- PL20210000341 Words G4WGk thFeugh are deleted;
Last Revised: August 13, 2021 Words underlined are added
Page 2 of 10
EXHIBIT B
SAVANNAH PLACE RPUD
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Table I below sets forth the development standards for land uses within the RPUD.
Standards not specifically set forth herein shall be those specified in the applicable
sections of the Land Development Code (LDC) in effect as of the date of approval of
the site development plan (SDP)or subdivision plat.
TABLE 1
Residential Tract Development Standards
Single -Family
Detached
Single -Family
Attached
Townhouse
PRINCIPAL STRUCTURES
Min. Lot Area
5,000 SF
3,500 SF
n/a
Min. Lot Width
50'
35'
n/a
Min. Floor Area
1,000 SF
1,000 SF
n/a
MINIMUM SETBACKS:
PUD Boundaries,
except east side
25'
25'
25'
PUD Boundary- east
side
15'
15'
15'
Front (see note 1)
20'
20'
20'
Side (see note 2)
7.5'
0'/6'
0'/7.5'
Rear
15'
15'
15'
Preserve
25'
25'
25'
Min. Distance Between
Principal Structures
15'
12'
15'
Maximum Zoned Height
30'
30'
30'
Maximum Actual Height
40'
40'
40'
Note 1: Driveways shall be a minimum of 23 feet from the edge of sidewalk to the face
of the garage door or building facade in order to prevent parking across pedestrian
ways. Ten foot minimum front setbg-cks are allowed where lots contain a side -loaded
ag_ raae•
Note 2: Zero foot minimum side setback on one side of building as long as a minimum
15-foot separation between principal structures is maintained.
Savannah Place RPUD- PL20210000341 Words s#kFeWgh are deleted;
Last Revised: August 13, 2021 Words underlined are added
Page 3 of 10
Note 3: Principal and accessory uses shall not be permitted to encroach into any
required PUD perimeter setback.
TABLE 1.1
Residential Tract Development Standards
Single -Family
Detached
Single -Family
Attached
Townhouse
CLUBHOUSE/
RECREATION
BUILDINGS
ACCESSORY STRUCTURES
Min. Lot Area
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
Min. Lot Width
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
MINIMUM SETBACKS:
PUD Boundary, except
adjacent to Orange
Blossom Drive
10,
10,
15'
20'
PUD Boundary, adjacent
to Orange Blossom Drive
25'
25'
25'
25'
Front (see note 1)
20'
20'
10'
20'
Side
5'
S'
S'
7.5'
Rear
5'
S'
S'
15'
Preserve
10'
10,
10,
25'
Min. Distance Between
Accessory Structures
0'
0'
0'
0'
Maximum Zoned Height
30'
30'
30'
30'
Maximum Actual Height
40'
40'
40'
40'
Note 1: Driveways shall be a minimum of 23 feet from the edge of sidewalk to the face
of the garage door or building fagade in order to prevent parking across pedestrian
ways. Ten foot minimum front setbacks are allowed where lots contain a side -loaded
act
TABLE 2
Preserve Tract Development Standards
No development standards are required since no structures are allowed to be located
within the Preserve Tract. Development shall be in accordance with LDC standards.
Savannah Place RPUD- PL20210000341 Words StFUGk thFGWgh are deleted;
Last Revised: August 13, 2021 Words underlined are added
Page 4 of 10
B:\Projects%956-200 (Savannah Place) PH PPL & SIP%Drawings-Exhlblts%956-200-02 MCP\Current Plans%9562000204 dwg
z
N 0
Am
m
�1-1C2N
mD(n00
3D�-1-1 rmn
m
m
fn9mrlZ
gn>c-
° m={
�r-
(no
mo)
m��COp
z z
n��p�
D
m z
-
r r
(n
m cv
6G)mpv,
zD(n�00
m �n
r r
(min m
i D T z
•1
II II II
r
-v
=m Dm
m om
m ?1
mD dv
ZD
b' u,m
-n
_
�A
m0 0r_
�n
I
-n9 mz
y-4OD
m mm
rn rna�
j k
-0m yc
m
-
OD O�
-u 0>
p
"n 0"n�
����
M<
mp
k
1 c -<
>- mFA
Z
0�
II I z
m m
� m
D W
9�
(n
II
I
m�
00 G)0
„�O�
Kcmm
Om
zX
.-.�,.�
CN
mm
r
II
U)�-1�'
I
�m�'W
G)m m
z
-1A
II � -n
map2�
mm
ma,
„ D
I -n -O�
m
0--I
II
-+cn
�cm -
>�
��
nZ
I mv�
-rG0
r
0°m
O -I = Cobo
oN p
r
u
-1
C
� -n
17,
M O
vp µ
3
C
D1 ;O
I
m
m(nm n
°Ztn M
3
Az my
m0
C N
(n O
m
.Zl
p-V
m C
mr-m m
cnmz
m
X
�_
-u
XX> m
m z
W n
0 p
DD �'
_I
�'< m
p
O-
I
TI ?
m
3-j z
0
m
o m m
n
z O
m-I
m
n
(n
�
0> �_
i D
c
z
,, 17 D
µ
D
D
7
m
I l], 0 Z
C
m ,� R1 r
� r
W
n-1
D
O
I
-noOCu,
z
m> mai0 r
mµ y
vD II
m
m
rmnZ
X
'�
��
m� Zr
�m
I
�� --nn�
�� (nmzr
zm
�,
M z
°°
I
j zp mp
G)mp�m
D p�m
r ZZq
GZ) ami W
m� z
>
II
m
W
I
mao�-n�
m0(n
D� Zi
�
0
po
m
z
I
Doocmi� v
m
m�
F r-
�
m
n
9 c _,
-n
D
..
DD
m
N
— —
1
09
_
m�
�
---
— — —
— — — — — — —
— — — —
0 C:m
<
—
ORANGE BLOSSOM DRIVE
— —
—
—
\()/ W
C� „-N
1�I „ z
I 1 r
;1-1c-omN
r
cngmomOz
�
r ;(1-1CXWN
sl 13"1NJS
mm
m
o
p
IZ
m-Z Xp
Dmomm
nA
<
-4 0
0 Gi p
m�J0V0
o
m
z Z
m m 5
m
(7
') -0
z
Z
Q
m
m
mo
H1210 N
PLAN REVISIONS
l I
SAVANNAH PLACE RPUD
rENGIN7EEIR1ING
PUD MASTER PLAN
EXHIBIT C
1OF3
naMosrm ,v»urie»
,rwr.rn.r+n.aw...w.�
B:\Projects\956-200 (Savannah Place) PHI PPL & SIP\Drawings-Exhibits+956-200-02 MCP•.Current Plans\9562000204 dwg
O N a ! 0
lz
�m0gm
a'z�zv'
0
'Cod
-z D p3>3
0 lO i D-oN
0K D3D3
oT mm o m
o--------� yM Z;�
I I
D� I I �° L---�---J
o >ou m I I D ��
o D �' I ------- I p
m� I I m 0
p0 —I D
I I D m x
y D
O
0 2 m I --- ---- I � p
=o I I
C: I I
rn
m N I I
I I
Wm
mmOo
I I
L- 1---�
-n N n Z
O
00 ZOm
C)ZZZCn
n r
m�0C
D r 3 D 9
w z r O�mN
O (n vgvw
moww 2M--"'"-0 -'> om o m oA�A
rrcc�cmxmOrn��xn nmx , Z ODO
ZzmD-O-npToma�vromzm81!2O Jm 0 � D3y3
N'Ivm�mm�<�Z�mrvi�mA-jZAm Z r- Dm0<n
x O z mO x z m-q j� O m m TO Z W Z m ai c Tj m m m
> Z � z� m m Z m m D
m0O�v�ai�xvZ-cm�=�r�i)D v 7rc
v��3o��tWxomm-,iz=,Dim z O
ODzzzzmmm<Znxof-1Amc i m D
mjnai=zxmm>ozymoo<i.mm � n
°zm�mOmm-��mmDrn�NXv D Dv
v m= °' m m x z<<m� n; D q 1 n m
n{ o= Oxz m T m o< D D Dv Z
r vmzr �D<OoizKAm-4 m
o�mm=mOomyOz�o�Oo'mm =
r O I N m m x m Z r o o m o m N D< = m
G) OmmpmOzlzDmy„. >in-j
m� Z zpyGDm,Oxol�m�-cn-0m p
� z o i- o 6 m w m K> Z O C D O= c;�
n� mmzOMDmDD DOrn�Dmmz
xcn OZwo-v C �ml CD M O EiOA CD 0
_� O
c cn 0oAmz m-m�00�02Z�m
m m m- O�
m�o"�2 xz�� �mm �zC
c
'p" R mm z mom m
m m
PLAN REXgSIONS
SAVANNAH PLACE RPUD
ENGINEERING
m
7°
Pi'D MASTER PLAN
EXHIBIT
$ 2OF3
ns»+ui,m � s»aurnas o�u��.w.rw.o.�wa.�
0
w
c
I
I
I
m
I o
I
I
N m
m
I
N
o_
�0 I
�
o
I
BAProjects\956-200 (Savannah Place) PH1 PPL & SIP\Drawings-Exhibits\956-200-02 MCP\Current Plans\9562000204 dwg
0
V
O
l I
N
r
C
r
C
m
-
;u
r
cc
CD
m0
r
0
G)CD
,>v
D
�4
_
m
0
o�D
m
0
„o
<' D
T1
'
0
m O
r•
N
z
O
m
m
m
�
r
r
W
m
A
z
n
0
�
C
m 6D
N
0
(T
D -
Z
zEn
Z
1
Ui
O
O
D
i
_o
m
mzD
1'o
<
1
D
<
17
O
Z
PLAN REVISIONS
SAVANNAI I PLACE RPUD
ENGINEERING
PUD MASTER PLAN
Un a,..uawca
EXHIBIT C
urn
u
3 OF 3
xs�m emn, u,w, mne ,un �m ewn,rnwvl n Hsu
nsawosim ��m•,m•�
Deviation 1: A deviation from LDC Section 6.06.01.N which establishes the
minimum right-of-way width of 60 feet to be utilized, to allow for a 45-foot light -
of -way internal private right-of-way.
Deviation 2: A deviation from LDC Section 6.06.02.A which requires five-foot wide
sidewalks to be constructed on both sides of the local/internal rights -of -way. to
low a 6-foot wide side sidewalk on one side of the right-of-way.
Deviation 3: A deviation from LDC Section 4.06.02.C.2 which requires Type B
buffers to be fifteen feet wide, to allow a 10-foot-wide Type B buffer along the
portion of the eastern boundary abutting the Cav Lagoon PUD.
Savannah Place RPUD- PL20210000341 Words S#YGk thFeugh are deleted;
Last Revised: August 13, 2021 Words underlined are added
Page 8 of 10
Gvu�;= EXHIBIT F
SAVANNAH PLACE RPUD
DEVELOPMENT COMMITMENTS
One entity (hereinafter the Managing Entity) shall be responsible for PUD
monitorina until close-out of the PUD, and this entity shall also be responsible for
satisfying all PUD commitments until close-out of the PUD. At the time of this PUD
pproval, the Managing Entity is LB Orange Blossom, LLC. Should the Manaaina
Entity desire to transfer the monitoring and commitments to a successor entity.
then it must provide a copy of a legally binding document that needs to be
approved for legal sufficiency by the County Attorney. After such approval. the
Managing Entity will be released of its obligations upon written approval of the
transfer by County staff, and the successor entity shall become the Manaaina
Entity, As Owner and Developer sell off tracts, the Managing Entity, but the
Managing Entity shall not be relieved of its responsibility under this Section. When
the PUD are closed -out, then the Managing Entity is no longer responsible for the
monitoring and fulfillment of PUD commitments.
2. Transportation:
A. If the entrance is to be gated, the face of said gate shall be located so as to
maintain no less than a 100-foot throat length to the southerly edge of pavement
at the entrance intersection with Orange Blossom Drive.
B. The develeper owner, its successors or assigns. shall contribute its fair share of the
future intersection improvements at Orange Blossom Drive and Airport Road
within 90 days after request by the County.
The
intersection improvements will occur after 2025 and include but are not limited to
alignment of the east west Orange Blossom segments, adding additional turn
lanes, as well as signal and pedestrian modifications.
3. Water Management
A. Prior to submittal of the application for final development order, the developer
will coordinate the design and construction of a single three-inch (maximum)
bleeder into the Orange Blossom Road storm drain system. The coordination and
approval will be with the Collier County Stormwater Management and Road
Maintenance departments of the Transportation Division and the Engineering
Savannah Place RPUD- PL20210000341 Words StFUGk thFeugh are deleted;
Last Revised: August 13, 2021 Words underlined are added
Page 9 of 10
Department of the Community Development and Environmental Services
Division.
4. Landscaping
A. If the developer builds single-family, attached or single-family, detached
dwelling units, the developer will provide Type B landscape buffer vegetation
within the ten -foot width. If multi -family dwelling units are built then LDC-required
Type B landscape buffers will be provided in the standard 15 foot width. In
addition to the Type B requirements, the hedge along the shared property line
with Cay Lagoon will be maintained at a minimum height of eight feet. See also
Deviation 3 in Exhibit E.
Existing vegetation located along the shared property line with the Cay Lagoon
development and along the shared property line with the parcel identified by
Folio #00236640001, running for approximately 295 feet south from Orange
Blossom Drive right-of-way shall be retained, subject to staff approval, to the
maximum extent possible. Stormwater management design, necessary grade
changes, required infrastructure or approved construction footprints may
necessitate its removal. The need to remove existing vegetation shall be
demonstrated by the applicant as a part of the site/construction plan review
process.
D. The required yard tree for lots with side -loaded dwelling units and a 10-foot front
setback shall be small trees planted in groups of two (2) trees.
Savannah Place RPUD- PL20210000341 Words StFUek threugh are deleted;
Last Revised: August 13, 2021 Words underlined are added
Page 10 of 10