The URL can be used to link to this page

Agenda 10/12/2021 Item #11C (Immokalee Rd Corridor Congestion Study)10/12/2021 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Recommendation to approve the Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study from Livingston Road to Logan Boulevard and authorize the County Manager or designee to pursue the recommended improvements. (Lorraine Lantz, Principal Planner; Capital Project Planning) OBJECTIVE: To obtain approval of the Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study (Study) which evaluated the potential roadway improvements in the study area and recommended pursuing conventional and innovative intersection improvements, corridor improvements, and roadway network improvements throughout the corridor. CONSIDERATIONS: In 2020, Collier County initiated the Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study (Study) which analyzed intersections along Immokalee Road from Livingston Road to Logan Boulevard. The County undertook this study in response to increased congestion with segments operating at or above capacity and to address the continued growth expected along the corridor. The study evaluated both conventional (adding or extending travel lanes) and innovate solutions (non -conventional methods) along the corridor including the I-75 interchange and seven (7) intersections. The analysis followed Florida Department of Transportation's (FDOT) established methodology utilizing the Intersection Control Evaluation (ICE) process to evaluate and rank each intersection control alternative. Public safety, crash history, and design constraints were used to analyze the ICE -recommended alternative and develop the recommendations. The resulting recommendations include interim treatments and traditional solutions including optimizing signal timing, restriping, and shoulder repurposing, three (3) innovative intersection solutions and several network roadway improvements such as utilizing an adaptive traffic signal control system along the corridor, conducting several network connectivity studies, and creating interconnections and access improvements where possible. A summary table of the study recommendations and planning estimate costs by intersection or segment is attached. Both the Diverging Diamond Interchange at I-75 and the Livingston Road Overpass projects are fully funded through the Construction phase in the Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) Cost Feasible Plan between FY2026- 2030. The Advanced Construction of the proposed study recommendations are currently in the County's 5-Year Work Program FY2021-2025. FISCAL IMPACT: The current 5-Year Work Program includes funding, in the amount of $1 Million, for proposed study recommendations. The preliminary planning level estimated costs of all recommendations in the study total $82.3 Million. The County's 5-Year Work Program and Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) will be updated or amended, as necessary, to include the appropriate future phases or projects. The Board will have the opportunity to approve the funding allocations through the annual budget process and the adoption of the annual CIP. Approval of this item does not result in an additional fiscal impact of future phases of the project. GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: The project is consistent with the Growth Packet Pg. 265 10/12/2021 Management Plan and the MPO's Long Range Transportation Plan. LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: This item has been reviewed by the County Attorney, raises no legal issues at this time and requires majority vote for Board acceptance of the report. -JAK RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of County Commissioners accept the Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study from Livingston Road to Logan Boulevard and direct the County Manager or designee to: 1. Pursue an overpass at Immokalee Road and Livingston Road; 2. Pursue a Diverging Diamond Interchange (DDI) at the Immokalee Road/I-75 Interchange with coordination with FDOT; 3. Pursue a Partial Displaced Left Turn (PDLT) also known as a Continuous Flow Intersection (CFI) at Immokalee Road and Logan Boulevard; 4. Pursue other recommended activities necessary to manage congestion and improve the operational efficiency, safety and functionality of this corridor and the transportation network in the county; 5. Continue with public engagement with impacted stakeholders through the design and construction process; 6. Direct staff to implement adaptive traffic signal control and develop a phasing plan for the addition of combined through/right turn lanes, and incorporate into the upcoming capital improvement element. Prepared by: Lorraine Lantz, AICP, Principal Planner, Capital Project Planning, Impact Fees, and Program Management ATTACHMENT(S) 1. Summary Table of Study Recommendations (PDF) 2. [Linked] Immokalee Rd Corridor Congestion Study - Report (PDF) 3. [Linked] Immokalee Rd Corridor Congestion Study - Appendixes A - D (PDF) 4. [Linked] Immokalee Rd Corridor Congestion Study - Appendix E Public Involcement (PDF) Packet Pg. 266 11.0 10/12/2021 COLLIER COUNTY Board of County Commissioners Item Number: I LC Doe ID: 17731 Item Summary: Recommendation to approve the Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study from Livingston Road to Logan Boulevard and authorize the County Manager or designee to pursue the recommended improvements. (Lorraine Lantz, Principal Planner; Capital Project Planning) Meeting Date: 10/12/2021 Prepared by: Title: Project Manager — Capital Project Planning, Impact Fees, and Program Management Name: Lorraine Lantz 08/11/2021 2:12 PM Submitted by: Title: Director — Capital Project Planning, Impact Fees, and Program Management Name: Matthew McLean 08/11/2021 2:12 PM Approved By: Review: Growth Management Operations Support Raquel Ovares Growth Management Department Lissett DeLaRosa Growth Management Department Growth Management Operations Support Christopher Johnson Growth Management Department Gene Shue Additional Reviewer Capital Project Planning, Impact Fees, and Program Management Matthew McLean Growth Management Department James C French Growth Management Growth Management Department Trinity Scott Transportation Office of Management and Budget Laura Wells Level 3 OMB Gatekeeper Review Office of Management and Budget Susan Usher Additional Reviewer County Attorney's Office Jeffrey A. Klatzkow Level 3 County Attorney's Office Review County Manager's Office Amy Patterson Level 4 County Manager Review Board of County Commissioners Geoffrey Willig Meeting Pending Additional Reviewer Completed Completed 08/25/2021 8:58 AM Additional Reviewer Completed Completed 08/31/2021 9:36 AM Additional Reviewer Completed Skipped 08/31/2021 11:50 AM Completed 09/24/2021 1:29 PM Completed 09/27/2021 9:19 AM Completed 09/28/2021 9:51 AM Completed 09/28/2021 2:58 PM Completed 10/06/2021 11:53 AM 10/12/2021 9:00 AM Packet Pg. 267 Summary Table of Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study Recommendations 11.C.1 Intersection or Recommendation Estimate Segment By 2025 T By 2040 Constructi Segment Costs Livingston Road Restripe/modify the Immokalee Road $10,000,01 to Logan westbound right -turn lane and shoulder area Boulevard to a combination through/right-turn lane from west of Logan Boulevard to east of ... Livingston Road. M Note: Includes miscellaneous intersection improvements. 0 Intersection w Livingston Road Construct a grade -separated overpass with A four -lane, grade -separated overpass will m $38,000,01 c Livingston Road over Immokalee Road. be constructed with Livingston Road over o c� Immokalee Road. Construct triple left -turn c Only if overpass construction is postponed, lanes for southbound on Livingston Road. include Livingston northbound and Provide channelized right -turn lanes for L c southbound free -flow right -turn lanes (with northbound and southbound on Livingston v yield). Construct Livingston Road Road. Evaluate the addition of a dual c northbound and southbound triple left -turn northbound right and an at -grade oC lanes onto Immokalee Road. southbound through lane during design. d Strand Conventional improvements: Add Conventional improvements: Increase $1,500,00 le Boulevard/Juliet southbound left and dedicated right -turn storage lane length for westbound left -turn E Boulevard lane. Increase storage lane lengths for the lanes on Immokalee Road. E eastbound left -turn lanes on Immokalee Road and the northbound left turn lane on Note: Must be constructed with I-75. ti Juliet Boulevard. I-75 Interchange Interim may include: Restripe northbound Construct DDI. Coordinate with FDOT. $9,000,00 w and southbound off-ramp(s) right -turn lanes Timing (BD) depends on FDOT's 1-75 c as a shared RT/LT lane. Add second Southwest Connect I-75 South Corridor westbound on -ramp right -turn to 1-75 Study. c northbound with ramp signal. Extend length E of 1-75 northbound with ramp signal. Extend E length of I-75 northbound and southbound off ramps. Northbrook Conventional Improvements: Add Conventional Improvements: Add a $6,000,00 Drive/Tarpon southbound left -turn, right turn, and through northbound left -turn lane, converting the Cn Bay Boulevard lanes. Increase storage lane lengths for the existing northbound shared through/left — westbound left -turn lane on Immokalee lane into through only. Road. Add an eastbound left -turn lane on 2� Immokalee Road and extend the storage lang lengths. Note: must be constructed E with the I-75 DDI improvements. E Oakes Extend the eastbound right -turn lane storage Included w CO Boulevard by 50 feet in conjunction with the extension Northbroc m of the westbound right -turn lanes onto Drive E Tarpon Bay Boulevard. Im roveme Valewood Drive N/A Conventional improvements: Add a $300,00( Q dedicated southbound right -turn lane. Restripe the through/left-turn lane as a through/right-turn lane. Executive Drive N/A N/A N/A Logan Optimize signal timing after the Logan Construct a PDLT (E-W). Note: Partial $17,500,O1 Boulevard Boulevard Turn Lane improvement project. displaced lefts impact Logan Landings Plaza access on Immokalee Road and shall be further evaluated. Packet Pg. 268 r ��.^ ,�,�,� -fir ,r -.� - ►�i,9-. � ',»�! _ - r 4 J J01 N=i MVP! 11 ' 1 Immokalee-Roid" Corridor Congest'ion_Sjudy from L'iv'ingston Road to Logan Boulevard lip Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study from Livingston Road to Logan Boulevard Contents Acronyms and Abbreviations.......................................................................................................................................... v 1. Project Introduction.......................................................................................................................................1-1 1.1 Project Needs...................................................................................................................................................1-2 1.2 Existing Conditions........................................................................................................................................1-3 1.2.1 Existing Roadway Conditions....................................................................................................1-3 1.2.2 Existing Typical Section..............................................................................................................1-3 1.2.3 Existing Traffic Characteristics.................................................................................................1-4 1.2.4 Crash Data and Safety Analysis...............................................................................................1-5 1.2.5 Existing Land Use..........................................................................................................................1-6 1.2.6 Existing Multimodal Services and Facilities........................................................................1-9 2. Corridor Traffic Demand...............................................................................................................................2-1 2.1 Traffic Volume Projections.........................................................................................................................2-1 2.2 Level of Service Analysis.............................................................................................................................2-1 2.2.1 Existing LOS.....................................................................................................................................2-2 2.2.2 No -Build Analysis LOS.................................................................................................................2-2 3. Development of Alternatives.......................................................................................................................3-1 3.1 Intersection Control Evaluations..............................................................................................................3-1 4. Alternatives Analysis and Recommendations.........................................................................................4-1 4.1 Corridor Improvements...............................................................................................................................4-1 4.2 Intersection Improvements........................................................................................................................4-2 4.2.1 Livingston Road and Immokalee Road.................................................................................4-2 4.2.2 Strand Boulevard/Juliet Boulevard........................................................................................4-8 4.2.3 1-75 Interchange......................................................................................................................... 4-12 4.2.4 Northbrooke Drive/Tarpon Bay Boulevard......................................................................4-19 4.2.5 Oakes Boulevard.........................................................................................................................4-23 4.2.6 Valewood Drive...........................................................................................................................4-27 4.2.7 Executive Drive............................................................................................................................4-30 4.2.8 Logan Boulevard.........................................................................................................................4-32 4.3 Roadway Network Improvements.........................................................................................................4-36 4.3.1 Adaptive Traffic Signal Control............................................................................................. 4-36 4.3.2 Logan Boulevard Network Connectivity Study...............................................................4-37 4.3.3 Livingston Road Network Management Improvements Study.................................4-37 4.3.4 Modify the Northbrooke Drive and Oakes Boulevard Connection ..........................4-38 4.3.5 Target Shopping Center Access Improvements.............................................................4-38 5. Conclusions and Costs...................................................................................................................................5-1 6. Public Involvement........................................................................................................................................6-1 7. References........................................................................................................................................................7-1 Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study from Livingston Road to Logan Boulevard Appendixes Appendix A Crash Data Appendix B Traffic Count Data & Traffic Projections Appendix C Synchro Reports Appendix D Intersection Control Evaluation Forms Appendix E Public Involvement Tables Table 1-1. Existing Traffic Characteristics...............................................................................................................1-4 Table 1-2. Crash Rate Analysis Including Short Form Reports (2014 to 2018)............................................1-5 Table2-1. Existing LOS(2019)..................................................................................................................................2-3 Table 2-2. 2025 No -Build LOS (Worst -Case Scenario).........................................................................................2-5 Table 2-3. 2040 No -Build Analysis (Worst -Case Scenario)................................................................................2-7 Table 4-1. 2040 Conditions: Livingston Road No -Build vs. Overpass..............................................................4-4 Table 4-2. Livingston Road - 2040 Peak Capacity Analysis................................................................................4-7 Table 4-3. 2040 Conditions: Strand Boulevard/Juliet Boulevard No -Build vs. PUT..................................4-9 Table 4-4. Strand Boulevard/Juliet Boulevard - 2040 Peak Capacity Analysis .......................................... 4-11 Table 4-5. 2040 Conditions: 1-75 Interchange No -Build vs. DDI....................................................................4-15 Table 4-6. 1-75 Interchange — 2040 Peak Capacity Analysis........................................................................... 4-18 Table 4-7. 2040 Conditions: Northbrooke Drive/Tarpon Bay Boulevard No -Build vs. Conventional... 4-21 Table 4-8. Northbrooke Drive/Tarpon Bay Boulevard— 2040 Peak Capacity Analysis ............................. 4-23 Table 4-9. Oakes Boulevard - 2040 Peak Capacity Analysis............................................................................ 4-25 Table 4-10. 2040 Conditions: Valewood Drive No -Build vs. Conventional.................................................. 4-28 Table 4-11. Valewood Drive - 2040 Peak Capacity Analysis........................................................................... 4-30 Table 4-12. Executive Drive - 2040 Peak Capacity Analysis............................................................................ 4-31 Table 4-13. 2040 Conditions: Logan Boulevard No -Build vs. PUT..............................................................4-33 Table 4-14. Logan Boulevard — 2040 Peak Capacity Analysis........................................................................ 4-36 Table 5-1. 2040 Projected Reductions in Intersection Delay.............................................................................5-1 Table 5-2. Final Recommendations Summary.......................................................................................................5-2 Table 5-3. Planning Level Cost Estimates for Ultimate (2040) Improvements.............................................5-4 Table6-1. Study Notifications...................................................................................................................................6-1 Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study from Livingston Road to Logan Boulevard Figures Figure1-1. Regional Location Map...........................................................................................................................1-1 Figure1-2. Project Location Map..............................................................................................................................1-2 Figure 1-3. Existing Immokalee Road Typical Section.........................................................................................1-4 Figure1-5. Existing Land Use.....................................................................................................................................1-8 Figure 2-1. Severe Congestion at the Immokalee Road and Livingston Road Intersection ........................2-2 Figure 4-1. Proposed 2025 Immokalee Road Typical Section...........................................................................4-2 Figure 4-2. Livingston Road 2025 Volumes...........................................................................................................4-3 Figure 4-3. Livingston Road 2040 Volumes...........................................................................................................4-4 Figure 4-4. Livingston Road Preliminary Typical Section - North of Immokalee Road...............................4-5 Figure 4-5. Livingston Road Preliminary Typical Section - South of Immokalee Road...............................4-5 Figure 4-6. Proposed Concept of Overpass at Livingston Road Intersection.................................................4-6 Figure 4-7. Strand Boulevard/Juliet Boulevard 2025 Volumes........................................................................4-8 Figure 4-8. Strand Boulevard/Juliet Boulevard 2040 Volumes........................................................................4-9 Figure 4-9. Proposed Concept of Conventional Improvements at Strand Boulevard/Juliet Boulevard.... 4- 10 Figure 4-10. 1-75 2025 Volumes Southbound.................................................................................................... 4-12 Figure 4-11. 1-75 2025 Volumes Northbound....................................................................................................4-13 Figure 4-12. Severe Congestion Backup at the 1-75 On -Ramp (February 26, 2021)................................ 4-13 Figure 4-13. 1-75 2040 Volumes Southbound.................................................................................................... 4-14 Figure 4-14. 1-75 2040 Volumes Northbound.................................................................................................... 4-14 Figure 4-1 S. Proposed Concept of Diverging Diamond Interchange at 1-75............................................... 4-16 Figure 4-16. Existing and Proposed Typical Section at 1-75 Interchange.................................................... 4-17 Figure 4-17. Northbrooke Drive/Tarpon Bay Boulevard 2025 Volumes ...................................................... 4-19 Figure 4-18. Northbrooke Drive/Tarpon Bay Boulevard 2040 Volumes ...................................................... 4-20 Figure 4-19. Proposed Concept of Conventional Improvements at Northbrooke Drive/Tarpon Bay Boulevard...................................................................................................................................................... 4-22 Figure 4-20. Oakes Boulevard 2025 Volumes.................................................................................................... 4-24 Figure 4-21.Oakes Boulevard 2040 Volumes.................................................................................................... 4-24 Figure 4-22. Proposed Concept of Conventional Improvement at Oakes Boulevard ................................ 4-26 Figure 4-23. Valewood Drive 2025 Volumes....................................................................................................... 4-27 Figure 4-24. Valewood Drive 2040 Volumes....................................................................................................... 4-28 Figure 4-25. Proposed Concept of Conventional Improvements at Valewood Drive ................................ 4-29 Figure 4-26. Executive Drive 2025 Volumes....................................................................................................... 4-31 Figure 4-27. Executive Drive 2040 Volumes....................................................................................................... 4-31 Figure 4-28. Logan Boulevard 2025 Volumes.................................................................................................... 4-32 Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study from Livingston Road to Logan Boulevard Figure 4-29. Logan Boulevard 2040 Volumes 4-32 Figure 4-30. Proposed Concept of PDLT (or Continuous Flow Intersection) at Logan Boulevard ......... 4-35 Figure 4-31. Possible Connections for Connectivity ............................. Figure 4-32. Network Management Improvement Locations ............ Figure 6-1. Coffee with Commissioner Andy Solis ................................ Figure 6-2. Survey Response to Intersections Used Within Corridor 4-37 4-38 ..6-2 ..6-4 iv Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study from Livingston Road to Logan Boulevard Acronyms and Abbreviations AADT average annual daily traffic ADA Americans with Disabilities Act AM morning ATSC adaptive traffic signal control AUIR Annual Update and Inventory Report BCC Board of County Commissioners D1 RPM District 1 Regional Planning Model DDI diverging diamond interchange DLT displaced left turn FDOT Florida Department of Transportation ICE Intersection Control Evaluation LOS level of service MEV million entering vehicles MPO metropolitan planning organization PDLT partial displaced left turn PM afternoon ROW right-of-way SIAR Selected Interchanges Analysis Report SPUI Single Point Urban Interchange TCMA Transportation Concurrency Management Area TMC turning movement count TMV turning movement volume V/C volume to capacity vph vehicles) per hour Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study from Livingston Road to Logan Boulevard 1. Project Introduction Collier County Transportation Planning Division (hereafter, "the County") initiated the Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study (Study) to identify and evaluate potential improvements to reduce congestion along a segment of Immokalee Road (County Road 846) in unincorporated Collier County. This Study is Located in northwestern Collier County, at I-75. Immokalee Road is a major east -west arterial corridor that serves both urban and coastal Collier County, as well as areas of Golden Gate Estates and Immokalee, and is a designated Collier County Evacuation Route (refer to Figure 1-1). Figure 1-1. Regional Location Map The project study limits extend along Immokalee Road from Livingston Road to Logan Boulevard, approximately 2 miles (refer to Figure 1-2). Immokalee Road is an existing 6-lane roadway that can no Longer be widened because of constraints including the Cocohatchee Canal and development along the north side of the corridor which is approaching buildout, and development along the south side of the corridor which is dense with few available parcels remaining. Further, Immokalee Road is also policy constrained. Collier County roadways are constrained to a maximum of six lanes or when intensive land use development is immediately adjacent to roads. Therefore, simply widening Immokalee Road is not an option. This Study evaluates both conventional (adding or extending travel lanes) and innovative solutions (nonconventional methods) along the mainline corridor, as well as seven intersections and the 1-75 interchange: 1) Livingston Road 5) Oakes Boulevard 2) Strand Boulevard/Juliet Boulevard 6) Valewood Drive 3) 1-75 Interchange — Northbound and 7) Executive Drive Southbound On/Off Ramps 8) Logan Boulevard 4) Northbrooke Drive/Tarpon Bay Boulevard inn Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study from Livingston Road to Logan Boulevard U g w a w rom rrhee at -IMMOKALEERD[ Autumn Oaks Ln 1 a M�tlden Oaten OS r nishoaks Ln a North Coilier Z Regional Park J N Project Area -._ Canals w E 4 - Major Streets ' 1 J g Parks �I 0 0.25 0.5 Miles Figure 1-2. Project Location Map 1.1 Project Needs The purpose of the project is to identify and recommend potential improvements that would reduce congestion and improve the Level of Service (LOS) along the corridor. The current traffic volumes along the corridor are approaching capacity. The County's 2020 Annual Update and Inventory Report (AUIR) on Public Facilities reports that the segments on Immokalee Road between Livingston Road and 1-75, and between 1-75 and Logan Boulevard, is expected to be deficient by 2028 and 2025, respectively. By 2025 it is estimated that 75 percent of the morning (AM) peak hour movements at the intersection of Immokalee Road and Livingston Road will fail, while the other intersections in the corridor will have between 36 and 58 percent of their morning peak hour movements fail. By 2040 it is estimated that morning peak hour delays are significant, with the overall intersection delay at Livingston Road at 8 minutes, and the overall intersection delay at each of the remaining intersections ranging between 2.9 to 4.1 minutes. As drivers move through this corridor, each of these intersection delays will add up to significant increases in travel times, if no improvements are made. Immokalee Road is categorized as a Freight Distribution Route and a High Crash Corridor in the Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP). The roadway is critical in facilitating movement of local and regional traffic (including truck traffic) in northern Collier County. Additionally, Immokalee Road is one of three east -west connections to 1-75 in Collier County and is the only east -west connection from 1-75 in northern Collier County that connects to northeastern Collier County. The needs of the project are to: ■ Reduce congestion for future traffic needs because of population growth ■ Improve safety by reducing conflicts WA Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study from Livingston Road to Logan Boulevard The population of Collier County is expected to grow by more than 40 percent by 2045. The existing traffic volume along the project corridor averages 43,400 vehicles per day and is expected to increase to approximately 72,450 vehicles per day by 2040, or a growth of 67 percent. The Collier MPO 2040 LRTP ranked the 1-75 interchange at Immokalee Road as 7th in the Needs Assessment and identified the improvement as a Critical Needs Intersection with Major Ramp Improvements required. The 1-75 interchange was also included as a Congestion Management System/Intelligent Transportation System recommended needs project within the 2040 LRTP (Stantec 2015). The Collier MPO 2045 LRTP identified the following projects within the corridor limits for construction in its Cost Feasible Plan within the following planning periods: ■ Immokalee Road and Livingston Road Intersection (Major Improvements) - Years 2026 to 2030 ■ Immokalee Road and 1-75 Interchange (Major Improvements) — Years 2026 to 2030 ■ Immokalee Road and Logan Boulevard Intersection (Major Improvements) — Years 2036 to 2045 (with design between 2031 and 2035) Crash data were collected within a 275 foot -wide buffer around the center of each of the study intersections and evaluated over a 5-year period (2014 to 2018) and found that 1,267 crashes resulted in 15 severe (incapacitating) injuries, and three fatalities. Reducing congestion along the corridor will improve the safety by reducing the number of rear -end crashes often associated with congestion. Crash data results will inform the intersection and corridor design and improve overall safety along the corridor. Further, proposed access management changes also help enhance safety by limiting median openings to safe locations that reduce conflict points. The results of this study will allow the County and the Collier MPO to plan for, prioritize, and implement improvements needed along the corridor to support future needs. 1.2 Existing Conditions Existing conditions are documented in this section to identify engineering conditions along the proposed corridor that may have a bearing on selection of feasible alternatives. 1.2.1 Existing Roadway Conditions Within the project limits, roadways are owned and maintained by Collier County, with the exception of the 1-75 interchange. The County Growth Management Plan notes (based on Transportation Element 7), that Immokalee Road and 1-75 are Collier County Hurricane Evacuation Routes, and that Immokalee Road at I- 75 is a Traffic Control Point for hurricane evacuation. Further, the segment of Immokalee Road between Livingston Road and 1-75 is within the Collier County Northwest Transportation Concurrency Management Area (TCMA) which is authorized by Florida Statutes to regulate increased traffic volume for managing growth -related impacts to transportation facilities on an area -wide basis. The Northwest TCMA must maintain 85 percent of its north -south lane miles and 85 percent of its east -west lane miles at or above their adopted LOS standards of LOS E or better. 1.2.2 Existing Typical Section Within the project limits Immokalee Road is a 6-lane divided minor arterial'. Based on record plans, the roadway right-of-way (ROW) varies between 100 and 150 feet, and typically includes 11-foot-wide travel Lanes, 6-foot shoulders on the north side, and sidewalks adjacent to the outside westbound travel lane. Collier County's current Growth Management Plan Transportation Element 3 (amended June 13, 2017) film] Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study from Livingston Road to Logan Boulevard The roadway includes a raised median that varies in width between 6 and 34 feet. Type F curb and gutter are adjacent to the inside and outside lanes. The design speed and posted speed limit is 45 mph. The Cocohatchee Canal is located on the north side of the Immokalee Road and within 100 feet of canal ROW. A shared -use path is located on the north side of the canal from Northbrooke Drive to Logan Boulevard. Figure 1-3 presents the existing typical section. Figure 1-3. Existing Immokalee Road Typical Section 1.2.3 Existing Traffic Characteristics The County's AUIR on Public Facilities is an annual process the County performs to determine LOS based on the volume -to -capacity (V/C) ratio for each assessed County roadway segment. Within the study limits, Immokalee Road (from Livingston Road to Logan Boulevard) was reported to operate at LOS D, with an acceptable LOS of E or better. Table 1-1 presents a summary of the 2020 AUIR (Collier County 2020) existing traffic conditions along Immokalee Road within the project corridor. Table 1-1. Existing Traffic Characteristics %Change Existing Peak Hour in Posted Existing Directional Directional Speed Number Service Volume Year Limit of Volume (2019 to Acceptable 2020 Expected Road From To (mph) Lanes (vph) 2020) LOS LOS Deficient Immokalee Livingston 1-75 45 6 3,500 Increase by E D 2028 Rd. Rd. 18.43% Immokalee 1-75 Logan 45 6 3,500 Increase by E D 2025 Rd. Blvd 11.02% Note: vph = vehicles per hour iQ9 Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study from Livingston Road to Logan Boulevard 1.2.4 Crash Data and Safety Analysis Each intersection was analyzed for 5-year trends, crash type disaggregation, and severity of disaggrega- tion. The 5-year trend (2014 to 2018) compares total crashes to severe crashes at each intersection (refer to Figure 1-4). The intersection with the highest total reported crashes during the examined 5-year period is at Livingston Road and Immokalee Road. Crash type disaggregation indicates the total number of crashes based on crash type. Crash type correlations can indicate possible infrastructure or layout improvements needed to reduce or prevent common crash types. Based on the type of crashes at each intersection, crash type severity was assessed. The Northbrooke Drive/Tarpon Bay Boulevard intersection had the highest crash severity, with four severe crashes during the period from 2014 to 2018. 30% 25% 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% 16 41 OW NO w 0 0 0 ail �cl ° ■Total Crashes (1,267) ■Severe Crashes (15) Figure 1-4. Total and Severe Crashes from 2014 to 2018 The average and critical crash rates for the Immokalee Road corridor study area were calculated and compared to the statewide average. The critical crash rate analysis filters out'perceived' issues and evaluates safety based on documented events (CH2M 2015). The number of crashes for all intersections along Immokalee Road within the 5-year period is 1,267, which exceeds the statewide average at all but three intersections (the two ramp terminals and Executive Drive). The remaining intersections exceed the critical crash rate .2 Table 1-2 provides the crash rate analysis. Table 1-2. Crash Rate Analysis Including Short Form Reports (2014 to 2018) Total Severe Statewide Critical Crash Crash Average Crash Total Rate Severe Rate Crash Rate Rate Intersection Intersection Crashes (MEV) Crashes Fatalities (MEV) (MEV) (MEV) Category Livingston Rd. 269 1.659 2 0 0.012 0.826 0.946 Above Critical Rate Strand 246 2.226 1 0 0.009 0.826 0.973 Above Critical Blvd./Juliet Blvd. Rate 2 The critical crash rate calculation considers the individual intersection characteristics in addition to the statewide average crash rates. M61 Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study from Livingston Road to Logan Boulevard Table 1-2. Crash Rate Analysis Including Short Form Reports (2014 to 2018) Total Severe Statewide Critical Crash Crash Average Crash Total Rate Severe Rate Crash Rate Rate Intersection Intersection Crashes (MEV) Crashes Fatalities (MEV) (MEV) (MEV) Category 1-75 118 1.045 2 0 0.018 1.187 1.36 Below Average Southbound Ramp Terminal 1-75 Northbound 103 0.9 2 1 0.017 1.187 1.359 Below Average Ramp Terminal Northbrooke 211 2.037 4 2 0.039 0.826 0.978 Above Critical Dr./ Tarpon Bay Rate Blvd. Oakes Blvd. 87 1.022 0 0 0 0.826 0.994 Above Critical Rate Valewood Dr. 89 0.997 1 0 0.011 0.826 0.99 Above Critical Rate Executive Dr. 19 0.243 0 0 0 0.451 0.582 Below Average Logan Blvd. 125 1.235 3 0 0.03 0.826 0.98 Above Critical Rate TOTAL 1,267 - 15 3 - - - - Note: MEV = million entering vehicles The Northbrook Drive/Tarpon Bay Boulevard intersection is the only Location with multiple severe crashes of the same crash type in the 5-year study period, with four severe crashes from 2014 to 2018. The total crash rate of 2.037 million entering vehicles (MEV) is above the statewide average, and the critical crash rate is also greater than (0.152 crashes/MEV) the statewide average. Appendix A provides further crash data details. Severe crashes at this intersection included two angle crashes, one fatal and one incapacitating. Both the fatal and incapacitating injury -related angle crashes were traveling eastbound during the morning peak hour, ran a red light, and were hit by a northbound traveler. An immediate cost-efficient solution may be to adjust signal timing to increase the time gap between red and green signal phases. The tradeoff to this solution is a slight decrease in traffic operations. 1.2.5 Existing Land Use Existing land use along the project limits is primarily a mix of commercial and residential. The north side of the corridor are a mix of residential and commercial land uses (north of the Cocohatchee Canal) and mostly built out. The south side of the corridor includes two large shopping plazas on each side of 1-75, and several churches adjacent to the corridor east of 1-75. Low density residential areas are located between Tarpon Bay Boulevard and Oakes Boulevard just south of the corridor. There are some undeveloped parcels located on the south side of the corridor. Figure 1-5 presents the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) 2014-2016 Land Cover and Land Use data. Collier County's comprehensive plan, identified as the Growth Management Plan, identifies the future land use for this area as mostly within the Urban Residential Subdistrict, with the area between Northbrook Drive/Tarpon Bay Boulevard and Logan Boulevard, south of Immokalee Road identified as the Estates District. Future land use immediately surrounding 1-75 is identified as an Interchange Activity Center Subdistrict. `Ql Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study from Livingston Road to Logan Boulevard Multiple school exist within 0.3 mile of the corridor including Naples Christian Academy and several preschools. Within 1 mile of the corridor study area is a high school (Gulf Coast High School) and an elementary school (Laurel Oak Elementary). In addition, three schools are within a 2-mile distance, Pelican Marsh Elementary, North Naples Middle, and Oakridge Middle School. `erA Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study from Livingston Road to Logan Boulevard Figure 1-5 Legend Existing Land Use :::'Project Study Area Land Use Descriptions 0 Roads, Electrical Power Facilities 0 Golf Course bnmokafee Rd Corridor Congestion Study County Road 0 Residential Commercial, Institutional, Shopping M Forest Shrubs, Rangeland �,� 0 Canals, Reservoirs Community Recreation Facilities 0 Wetland Forest [Mier Ca."O Last updated 21)211525 Source Date:CoULN County GIS Hub. Florida GeograpMc Data u3rary. South Flonda water Management DMrict Figure 1-5. Existing Land Use 1-8 Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study from Livingston Road to Logan Boulevard 1.2.6 Existing Multimodal Services and Facilities There is one Collier Area Transit route within the project limits, Route 27, which provides service between US 41/Creekside (US 41 and Immokalee Road) and Golden Gate City. Within the project limits, Route 27 has four stops while traveling eastbound on Immokalee Road. One bus stop is located just west of Livingston Road with one stop located to the east of the Strand Boulevard/Juliet Boulevard, one stop to the west of Oakes Boulevard, and one stop to the east of Logan Boulevard. Traveling west bound is one bus stop on the west side of Northbrook Drive, just north of the intersection with Immokalee Road. Route 27 also provides service and a bus stop at the North Collier Regional Park (Sun-n-Fun Lagoon) on Livingston Road just south Immokalee Road. A park -and -ride lot was constructed (in 2020) in the northwest quadrant of the Livingston Road and Immokalee Road intersection. The lot provides public parking and includes a new bus stop, which was recently added to Route 27. Based on the Collier MPO 2021-2030 Transit Development Plan, one of three areas in the County with higher than average boardings is Route 27's Northbrook Drive stop. Route 27 provides fixed route service 7 days a week, and on average had a ridership of about 30,000 in 2019. As noted earlier, a shared -use path for pedestrians and bicyclists extends along the north side of Cocohatchee Canal (north side of Immokalee Road), between Northbrooke Drive and Logan Boulevard. A sidewalk extends along the south side of Immokalee Road along the project limits. A sidewalk is located just north of the Cocohatchee Canal from Livingston Road east to the shopping plaza (Carlton Lakes) entrancejust east of the intersection. `ml Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study from Livingston Road to Logan Boulevard 2. Corridor Traffic Demand Traffic demand along the corridor was determined by collecting existing traffic counts along the project corridor and using the data to determine the future traffic demand. The traffic volumes are modeled for both a 5-year (2025) and 20-year (2040) period to identify corridor improvements to accommodate future traffic growth. The following summarizes the future traffic projection analysis. 2.1 Traffic Volume Projections Turning movement counts (TMCs) were collected at intersections in the study area from March 7, 2019, to March 26, 2019. Counts were obtained via tube counts and were taken during the highest anticipated volumes, during peak hour, peak tourism season, and when schools were in session. Additionally, historical annual average daily traffic (AADT) volumes were obtained for the roadway segments from the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) Florida Traffic Online website (FDOT 2021) and Collier County Traffic Counts (Collier County 2019). The District 1 Regional Planning Model (D1 RPM) was also used to obtain projected volumes. Appendix B provides the traffic counts analyzed for this study. Traffic growth rates were determined using a combination of three different traffic projection methods. The growth rates were then applied to the intersection TMCs to obtain future year intersection turning movement volumes (TMVs) for 2025 and 2040. Traffic projections were developed using the following traffic projection methods: ■ Historical Regression Analysis via the FDOT Traffic Trends Analysis Tool • District 1 Regional Planning Model (D1 RPM) ■ Minimum annual growth rate Once the traffic growth rates were determined an upper range (worst -case scenario) and Lower range (best -case scenario) projections were developed. The worst -case scenario volumes were obtained by using the highest result from the three projection methods. The best -case scenario volumes were obtained by using the lowest result of the three projection methods. These projections were further refined at the intersection approaches, where land use has reached or is near development buildout. The growth rate for these intersections was reduced by 50 percent, including the southbound approaches of the intersections at Strand Boulevard, Northbrooke Drive, Valewood Drive, Executive Drive, and Oakes Boulevard. Vested trip bank volumes were also examined to determine whether planned future land use development is anticipated to generate higher traffic volumes than those obtained through the projection methods noted. The 2040 traffic projections were analyzed for both worst -case scenario and best -case scenario to forecast future LOS. The 2025 traffic projections analyzed the worst -case scenario. Appendix B includes a tabular summary of the 2040 forecasted volumes for each of the projection methods. Both scenarios were presented to the County and carried forward into the alternatives analysis. 2.2 Level of Service Analysis Morning (AM) and evening (PM) peak hour volumes were analyzed using Trafficware's Synchro 10 software. For both the best -case and worst -case scenarios, the intersection signal timing was coordinated throughout the corridor. A signal cycle length of 180 seconds was used for optimal traffic flow in the best - case scenario. Additionally, a 210 second cycle was used for the worst -case scenario for optimal traffic flow. The Synchro reports are provided in Appendix C. The following summarizes the existing and future No - Build (2025 and 2040) LOS. W Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study from Livingston Road to Logan Boulevard 2.2.1 Existing LOS The existing (2019) signal timing is coordinated to provide an LOS E or better for the eastbound and westbound through movements to optimize traffic flow through the corridor. Under existing conditions, there are several failing movements at each intersection along the corridor during the peak hour, as shown in Figure 2-1. Table 2-1 lists the existing LOS for each intersection. Figure 2-1. Severe Congestion at the Immokalee Road and Livingston Road Intersection (from January 27, 2021) 2.2.2 No -Build Analysis LOS The No -Build analysis evaluates the projected traffic volumes for 2025 and 2040 under the roadway's existing conditions (2019 lane configuration and geometry) with no improvements. The No -Build analysis was performed to determine deficiencies for 2025 and 2040. The LOS under the 2025 No -Build was evaluated using the highest projected volumes (worst -case conditions). By 2025, several movements are anticipated to be failing, with delays of more than 5 minutes. Refer to Table 2-2 for the LOS at each intersection. Table 2-3 summarizes the 2040 No -Build analysis for the worst -case scenario. The majority of movements are failing severely, with delays more than 16 minutes in some directions. The existing timing coordination was used for the 2025 and 2040 LOS projections to provide more green signal time (or bias) to the higher volume movements (east and westbound through movements). Because there are several failing movements and delays, the No -Build conditions for 2025 and 2040 will not meet the County's goal of obtaining an LOS E or better under the projected traffic volumes. Pba Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study from Livingston Road to Logan Boulevard Table 2-1. Existing LOS (2019) LOS and Delay (sec) per Direction Overall Intersection Peak Hour EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Intersection Delay (sec) Livingston Rd. F D A F D B F F D F F F AM 93 40 6 100 42 17 112 85 42 127 108 152 72 F D B F C A F F F F F F PM 94 43 10 99 27 6 100 151 128 150 117 114 81 Strand Blvd./Juliet Blvd. AM F B A F C A F E A F C 27 34 85 19 2 107 34 3 92 72 2 99 F C A F A A F F C F E PM 92 23 2 116 7 1 105 84 26 109 65 31 1-75 Southbound On/Off Ramps AM N/A E B C B N/A E N/A E 38 55 14 23 13 70 62 PM D A C A E C 35 45 8 31 6 67 30 1-75 Northbound On/Off Ramps AM C A N/A D F F N/A D N/A 42 33 3 35 91 116 35 PM A A D B F D 23 8 5 45 13 105 44 Northbrooke Dr./ F B A F B A F F A F F F Tarpon Bay Blvd. AM 108 19 4 95 17 0 196 194 3 100 88 129 43 F B A F B A F F A F F B PM 126 15 2 88 20 0 117 116 3 145 87 18 35 Valewood Dr. F A A F D A F D F C AM 127 3 0 116 39 0 105 55 80 30 34 2-3 Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study from Livingston Road to Logan Boulevard Table 2-1. Existing LOS (2019) LOS and Delay (sec) per Direction Overall Intersection Peak Hour EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Intersection Delay (sec) F B A F D A F D E A PM 148 14 0 83 41 0 116 50 70 10 33 Logan Blvd. F D A F D A F E B F F C AM 90 35 9 90 44 4 91 73 14 103 86 25 47 F B A F C A F E F F F A PM 124 15 1 133 21 0 101 78 170 152 109 9 53 Notes: EBL = eastbound Left EBT = eastbound through EBR = eastbound right NBL = northbound Left NBT = northbound through NBR = northbound right SBL = southbound Left SBT = southbound through SBR = southbound right WBL = westbound Left WBT = westbound through WBR = westbound right 2-4 Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study from Livingston Road to Logan Boulevard Table 2-2. 2025 No -Build LOS (Worst -Case Scenario) Intersection Peak Hour LOS and Delay (sec) per Direction Overall Intersection Delay (sec) EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Livingston Rd. AM F D A F F C F F F F F F 130 99 43 9 94 89 21 148 103 85 245 225 329 PM F D B F C B F F F F F F 143 101 51 13 100 32 11 113 231 214 288 264 288 Strand Blvd. /Juliet Blvd. AM E B A F F A F E A F D N/A 57 77 20 2 104 84 4 95 76 3 99 46 PM F C A F A A F F D F F 41 85 31 4 135 8 2 120 88 49 131 120 1-75 Southbound On/Off Ramps AM N/A F B C D N/A E N/A E 62 90 14 24 48 76 77 PM F A C A F C 57 87 7 33 8 94 35 1-75 Northbound On/Off Ramps AM C A N/A D F F N/A D N/A 74 25 5 45 211 196 47 PM A D D B F E 44 10 35 47 18 158 62 2-5 Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study from Livingston Road to Logan Boulevard Table 2-2. 2025 No -Build LOS (Worst -Case Scenario) Intersection Peak Hour LOS and Delay (sec) per Direction Overall Intersection Delay (sec) EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Northbrooke Dr./Tarpon Bay Blvd. AM F C A F E A F F A F F F 83 142 22 4 92 73 0 277 277 8 113 92 227 PM F C A F C A F F A F F B 44 124 22 3 89 22 0 157 156 7 195 91 18 Valewood Dr. AM F A A F F A F E F D 71 131 4 0 101 - 0 111 56 85 22 PM F B A F D A F D E B 39 175 20 0 83 41 0 129 51 74 22 Logan Blvd. AM F D A F E A F E B F F D 66 94 38 9 92 78 6 95 76 15 109 111 52 PM F B A F C A F F F F F B 74 118 19 1 191 23 0 112 81 304 184 154 15 Notes: N/A = not applicable 2-6 Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study from Livingston Road to Logan Boulevard Table 2-3. 2040 No -Build Analysis (Worst -Case Scenario) Intersection Peak Hour LOS and Delay (sec) per Direction Overall Intersection Delay (sec) EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Livingston Rd. AM F D B F F C F F F F F F 477 204 52 18 231 314 33 359 272 317 890 859 1119 PM F F C F D C F F F F F F 494 210 184 22 133 44 32 249 531 519 988 949 71OS3 Strand Blvd./ Juliet Blvd. AM E C A F F A F F B F F 192 58 33 4 91 358 10 135 83 17 115 170 PM F F B F C A F F F F F 166 86 221 11 270 24 2 264 j 95 199 345 403 1-75 Southbound On/Off Ramps AM N/A F B C E N/A F N/A F 171 297 16 29 56 250 281 PM F B D D F D 192 284 19 40 54 309 49 1-75 Northbound On/Off Ramps AM C D N/A F F F N/A F N/A 234 23 54 149 567 608 142 C E PF E F FPM 121 29 58 66 511 268 2-7 Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study from Livingston Road to Logan Boulevard Table 2-3. 2040 No -Build Analysis (Worst -Case Scenario) Intersection Peak Hour LOS and Delay (sec) per Direction Overall Intersection Delay (sec) EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Northbrooke Dr./Tarpon Bay Blvd. AM F C A F F A F F C F F F 245 287 33 5 92 280 0 625 625 29 217 120 591 PM F F A F D A F F C F F D 128 158 121 7 90 40 0 394 391 26 456 119 52 Valewood Dr. AM F B A F F A F E F F 210 220 14 0 99 320 0 143 60 150 291 PM F F A F D A F E F E 149 334 195 0 90 41 0 206 58 139 75 Logan Blvd. AM F E B F F B F E D F F F 226 87 58 20 143 372 12 173 80 47 198 262 248 PM F F A F C A F F F F F D 224 108 165 1 461 31 2 254 103 770 426 411 39 2-8 Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study from Livingston Road to Logan Boulevard 3. Development of Alternatives The FDOT's Intersection Control Evaluation (ICE) process was used to consistently evaluate and rank each intersection control alternative. Public safety, crash history, and design constraints were used to determine if the ICE recommended alternative was a feasible improvement for the intersection. Even with the recommended intersection controls, it is not anticipated that the corridor will operate at an acceptable LOS of E or better by 2040. Therefore, surrounding network improvements are also recommended to alleviate congestion on this corridor. 3.1 Intersection Control Evaluations The ICE procedure provides a standardized methodology for evaluating and ranking alternative control strategies and identifies the control strategy that will best improve an intersection's performance. The ICE process evaluates control strategies accounting for V/C ratios, multimodal scores, Safety Performance for ICE rankings (using crash data), intersection operation, and safety. The process ranks control strategies to better determine which should advance. The top ranking control strategies for each intersection were then evaluated for feasibility. A conceptual layout of the control strategy was overlaid onto the intersection for an initial assessment of geometric features to determine ROW constraints, business impacts, as well as natural and physical impacts (such as impacts to the Cocohatchee Canal and additional stormwater treatment required). Several intersections are in close proximity to each other, so constructability dependencies were also evaluated. Because ROW constraints restricted the feasibility of some improvements, V/C ratios for innovative intersections were still greater than 1.0 for several intersections. While ROW constraints are a factor, they are not the primary reason for a V/C ratio greater than 1.0. Because of geometric constraints, several control strategies were eliminated based on the limited ROW availability and were not carried forward for further analysis. Conceptual estimates were developed for each control strategy to develop approximate costs. Several meetings occurred between the Study team and County staff to discuss ICE results and strategies acceptable to the County. Refer to Appendix D for the ICE results for each intersection under 2040 conditions. Mal Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study from Livingston Road to Logan Boulevard 4. Alternatives Analysis and Recommendations As a result of the ICE process, feasible corridor improvements were evaluated to identify those that would efficiently and effectively accommodate the projected growth by reducing congestion and improving overall corridor operations. Innovative alternatives were analyzed in conjunction with conventional improvements to alleviate congestion to the greatest extent practicable. Conventional improvements are defined as adding or extending travel lanes to the intersection or interchange's existing geometry. Each intersection/interchange was first assessed to determine improvements required for 2040. Next, improvements for 2025 were evaluated to ensure the interim (2025) recommendations would align with the ultimate (2040) recommendation. General planning -level cost estimates were established to compare alternative control strategies. Intersection alternatives where costs were determined to be too high for Limited benefit were eliminated. The following summarizes proposed corridor improvements as well as the analyses and recommendations for each intersection along the corridor. Note that through coordination with Collier Area Transit, additional project improvements will include Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) compliance for any existing transit stops along the project corridor. ADA compliance details will be evaluated during the design phase. 4.1 Corridor Improvements Multiple improvements were evaluated along the project corridor as interim and ultimate solutions. However, many were found to be not feasible. Both policy and ROW constraints will not allow for any additional through lanes along Immokalee Road by 2040. Therefore, no 2040 corridor improvements are recommended. The 2025 corridor recommendation includes restriping the existing right -turn lanes and shoulder area as a shared westbound through/right-turn lane along Immokalee Road (beginning west of Logan Boulevard and ending east of Livingston Road (plaza entrance)). This will require slightly expanding of the roadway to the north, constructing an 11-foot-wide combination right -turn and through travel lane, installing curb and gutter, and relocating the canal guardrail to the north. It will also require miscellaneous improvements at the intersections, such as relocating (or replacing) a signal mast arm, relocating light poles, and realigning/restriping southbound turn lanes to provide proper turning radii onto the new lane. Figure 4-1 presents the proposed typical section. Note: Permitting feasibility and water treatment and attenuation area requirements for roadway expansion (into the Cocohatchee Canal) should be evaluated and was not included as a part of this Study. M Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study from Livingston Road to Logan Boulevard Figure 4-1. Proposed 2025 Immokalee Road Typical Section 4.2 Intersection Improvements The following presents the intersection control analyses and recommendations for 2025 and 2040 for each intersection. The eliminated alternatives are also summarized. The peak hour TMVs for the worst - case scenario are provided for the 2025 and 2040 analysis, and a concept of the final recommendation is provided for each intersection. Note that additional stormwater treatment will be required for the corridor and intersection recommendations. It is recommended to evaluate the use of compensatory treatment at the Collier County parcels located at the southeast quadrant of the 1-75 interchange and the southeast quadrant of the Valewood Drive intersection. Refer to the concept plans for the 1-75 interchange (Figure 4-15) and Valewood Drive intersection (Figure 4-25), for identification of these parcels. Permitting feasibility and stormwater treatment and attenuation requirements were not included as a part of this Study. 4.2.1 Livingston Road and Immokalee Road 2025 and 2040 Analyses and Recommendations Based on the projected volumes for both 2025 and 2040 (refer to Figures 4-2 and 4-3), along with the ICE analysis, the recommended improvement is an overpass where Livingston Road is bridged over Immokalee Road. The analysis indicated there is no interim solution for 2025 that would also support projected 2040 traffic volumes. Therefore, no interim (2025) solution is recommended. Since the No -Build condition for 2025 is projected to have peak hour delays for the southbound movements ranging between approximately 4-5 minutes, it is recommended to proceed directly with the ultimate (2040) recommendation. The Collier MPO's 2045 LRTP identified a major intersection improvement at the Immokalee Road and Livingston Road intersection in its Cost Feasible Plan within the years 2026 to 2030. Additional lanes will also be required for the 2040 traffic volumes and should be incorporated with the design and construction of the overpass. Table 4-1 compares the LOS between the proposed overpass and the No -Build condition for 2040. The proposed intersection recommendation is to convert Livingston Road to a four -lane bridge over Immokalee Road with an at -grade facility to accommodate access to local businesses and residential developments. An at -grade northbound through lane will provide local access to properties located on the «a Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study from Livingston Road to Logan Boulevard northeast quadrant of the intersection. An additional southbound left -turn lane will be added to Livingston Road to provide a triple left movement from southbound Livingston Road to eastbound Immokalee Road. U-turns are recommended at the intersection for the northbound and southbound movements along Livingston Road. Along Livingston Road, the northbound and southbound right -turn Lanes will be redesigned as a free -flow right -turn movements. The southbound right -turn lane is recommended as free -flow with an acceleration lane, and the northbound right -turn movement is recommended with channelized yield control because of ROW constraints. If a free -flow northbound right - turn movement is not provided, the movement delay is anticipated to increase from approximately 1 second to approximately 323 seconds (or 5.4 minutes) in the AM, as well as increasing delays at the other movements to compensate for the green time needed for northbound right turns. An at -grade southbound through lane should be evaluated further during design. Constraints such as ROW setback requirements, and lane geometry should be evaluated to determine feasibility of this lane. A second northbound right -turn lane (or shared northbound through/right-turn lane) should also be evaluated further during design. While a second northbound right -turn lane will improve traffic operations, pedestrian safety (i.e. refuge island) should also be accommodated. Table 4-1 includes an at -grade southbound through lane and dual northbound right -turn lanes in the model. Route 27 may require adjustments as it approaches the park -and -ride stop at the northwest quadrant of the intersection. There is an existing U-turn for northbound Livingston Road traffic, just north of the park - and -ride lot. This U-turn is to be further evaluated during the design phase to determine if it should remain. If the U-turn access remains, no change is anticipated for the bus route. If the U-turn is removed, the bus will be required to travel an additional 0.3 miles north and make a U-turn at the intersection of Carlton Lakes Boulevard/Delasol Lane. No other changes are anticipated to Route 27. Figures 4-4 and 4-5 provide the preliminary typical sections for the Livingston Road overpass for north and southbound, respectively, while Figure 4-6 provides a concept of the proposed overpass. 3867 2368 J 1499 AM Peak 707 1084 577 3248 394 N 4887 e _ 1042 W E 1c39 203 S 355 1 644 1 412 1759 41� 1412 3171 4383 2458 II 1925 PM Peak 6s1 1239 s6a 461 1 $118 2123 1 381 21$5 5149 4624 r11,711472 2031 2501 Figure 4-2. Livingston Road 2025 Volumes N 559 2043 uV E 1208 4985 S 276 2942 2fi4 885 504 1765 1753 351$ 4-3 Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study from Livingston Road to Logan Boulevard 716C AM 6201 2401 3243 4 2149 5392 Figure 4-3. Livingston Road 2040 Volumes r7992 PM Peak 5119 II� 2873 SVV7 LLLJJJ 1356 2681 1182 4547 3519 559 7902 7187? 2742 3355 3668 367 Table 4-1. 2040 Conditions: Livingston Road No -Build vs. Overpass N W E 5 402 1499 767 3350 V 2668 6018 815 12978 171 � 7669 402 4691 LOS and Delay (sec) per Direction (2040) Overall Control Peak Intersection Strategy Hour EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Delay (sec) F D B F F C F F F F F F AM 477 204 52 18 231 314 33 359 272 317 890 859 1119 No -Build F F C F D C F F F F F F PM 494 210 184 22 133 44 32 249 531 S19 988 949 1053 F D B F F A F F A F F A AM 77 Overpass 178 49 18 86 98 5 189 104 10 88 102 1 (Best- casea) PM F F B F C B F F F F F A 65 89 86 18 130 23 12 102 115 87 101 99 1 F E C E F B F F B F F C I I 1 1152 AM Overpass 332 67 29 77 188 18 350 227 14 277 346 28 (Worst- casea) F F C F F E F F F F F B PM 143 16S 148 26 24S 84 71 237 249 251 238 239 12 a Signal timing was adjusted to accommodate the eastbound and westbound through movements to optimize traffic flow through the corridor (to match existing signal timing). M-1 Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study from Livingston Road to Logan Boulevard Figure 4-4. Livingston Road Preliminary Typical Section — North of Immokalee Road Figure 4-5. Livingston Road Preliminary Typical Section — South of Immokalee Road FAM Livingston Road and Immokalee Road Intersection Intersection Plan View Proposed Conceptual > i Above -Grade (Raised) Approach/Departure Lanes to Bridge _ Triple Left z �> Turn Lanes pt'de(Ground Level) Southbound Through Lane u R o r - TBD during design Right Turn 4-Lane Bridge ` Sri Lane �� (Overpass)A. _ Immokalee Rd LEGEND DuaT'., Right Turn Lanes j.. - BD during design r Proposed .• r G At -Grade (Ground Level) Landscape Above -Grade (Raised) Northbound Through Lane Approach/Departure 1 Proposed PavemenU Resurfacing Lanes to Bridge }py`I� y i141I`I Double Left Turn Lanes F x•p `fb O to Proposed Overpass t - "� ice' : _ _ •� '^ —_ ty- Rfi Im .e Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study from Livingston Road to Logan Boulevard Livingston Road Intersection Eliminated Alternatives Table 4-2 summarizes the capacity analysis for the alternative control strategies reviewed for AM and PM peak periods in 2040. The following describes the eliminated intersection control alternatives and the reasons they were eliminated. Single Point Urban Interchange (SPUI) (East-West): There is not enough ROW for an SPUI in the east -west direction. The overpass was modeled in this study as a SPUI north -south. However, there is not enough ROW for on/off ramps for a complete SPUI east -west or north -south. In addition, there is a conflict with the existing transmission lines west of Livingston Road. Therefore, an overpass, which is a modification of a SPUI (no ramps), is recommended for the north -south direction. Displaced Left Turn (also known as Continuous Flow Intersection): Although the displaced left turn has the lowest construction cost for 2025 and would provide relief, it will not support the 2040 traffic volumes. This alternative is not recommended because while it has a low construction cost, it is not cost- efficient as an interim solution and construction funds would be better spent towards the ultimate 2040 improvements. Additionally, it would cause a great level of disruption to the public during construction. Echelon (North -South): This strategy is not feasible because of proximity to existing transmission lines that run parallel to the west side of Livingston Road. Therefore, this strategy was not advanced to the ICE process. Conventional Improvements: The 2040 volumes would require six through lanes for both the eastbound and westbound movements. In addition, even with four southbound left -turn lanes, it would still result in an LOS F, with delays of almost 300 seconds per cycle. The conventional improvements required are not feasible within the available ROW. No -Build: Not providing any improvements would result in unacceptable delays of more than 1,000 seconds per cycle for the southbound right -turn movement in 2040. In addition, the southbound Left and southbound through movements are projected at more than 800 seconds of delay in each cycle. Table 4-2. Livingston Road - 2040 Peak Capacity Analysis Control Strategy AM Peak PM Peak Multimodal Score Overall V/C Ratio V/C Ranking Overall V/C Ratio V/C Ranking Diverging Diamond Interchange North -South 1.02 1 1.17 2 3.3 SPUI North -South 1.11 2 1.15 1 2.4 Displaced Left Turn 1.53 3 1.34 3 2.4 Displaced Left Turn (Interchange) East-West 1.70 4 1.34 3 2.4 Partial Displaced Left Turn (PDLT) East-West 1.74 5 1.51 8 2.4 PDLT North -South 1.75 6 1.49 7 2.4 Diverging Diamond Interchange East-West 1.81 7 1.41 5 3.3 MA Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study from Livingston Road to Logan Boulevard Table 4-2. Livingston Road - 2040 Peak Capacity Analysis Control Strategy AM Peak PM Peak Multimodal Score Overall V/C Ratio V/C Ranking Overall V/C Ratio V/C Ranking SPUI East-West 1.81 7 1.41 5 2.4 Displaced Left Turn (Interchange) North -South 1.85 9 1.77 9 2.4 Partial Median U-Turn North- South 2.15 10 2.18 11 3.1 Traffic Signal (Conventional) 2.23 11 1.89 10 2.4 4.2.2 Strand Boulevard/Juliet Boulevard 2025 Analysis and Recommendation Based on projected traffic volumes for 2025 (refer to Figure 4-7) and the ICE analysis, the following conventional improvements for 2025 are recommended: ■ Add a southbound left and dedicated right -turn lane on Strand Boulevard ■ Increase the storage lane length for eastbound left turns on Immokalee Road ■ Increase the storage lane length for northbound left turns on Juliet Boulevard 1004 n958 373 J L� 585 559 4t 435 AM Peak 228 20 125 PM Peak 288 36 245 3072 248 N 305 3113 2127 215 N 189 2122 8 1584 W E 2668 C 4932 5240 2583 W E 1671 5111 2006 174 S 142 1819 3113 334 S 262 2989 178 1 32 1 110 336 fl 320 656 168 1 34 1 181 632 n t 379 1011 Figure 4-7. Strand Boulevard/Juliet Boulevard 2025 Volumes Collier Area Transit needs include a bus shelter pad and bench at the existing bus stop east of Juliet Boulevard, and a new transit stop near Strand Boulevard. These transit needs should be evaluated during the design phase. 4-8 Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study from Livingston Road to Logan Boulevard 2040 Analysis and Recommendation Based on projected traffic volumes for 2040 (refer to Figure 4-8), increasing the storage lane length for the westbound left -turn lanes on Immokalee Road is recommended. This has a constructability dependency (must be constructed at the same time) with the proposed improvements for the I-75 interchange, which are anticipated between 2025 and 2040. 1330 1258 473 857 721 II 4 637 AM Peak 289 25 159 PM Peak VVV 385 45 311 4462 361 N 445 4540 3071 315 N 275 3095 7388 2311 W E 3889 7186 7612 3738 W E 2438 <- ' 7432 l 2926 254 5 206 2646 4541 488 5 382 4337 284 51 176 268 47 288 485 II � 511 915 � 1603 CT 15181 996 Figure 4-8. Strand Boulevard/Juliet Boulevard 2040 Volumes Table 4-3 provides a comparison of delay reduction from the No -Build scenario to the proposed conven- tional improvements for 2040. Figure 4-9 provides a concept of recommended improvements. Table 4-3. 2040 Conditions: Strand Boulevard/Juliet Boulevard No -Build vs. PDLT LOS and Delay (sec) per Direction (2040) Overall Control Peak Intersection Strategy Hour EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Delay (sec) No -Build E C A F F A F F B F F AM 192 58 33 4 91 358 10 135 83 17 115 170 F F B F C A F F F F F PM 166 86 221 11 270 24 2 264 95 199 345 403 Conventional E D B F D F F B F D AM 50 (Best -case') 74 46 15 85 48 99 82 17 91 35 E F B F D F E D F F PM 99 77 155 13 141 44 90 72 36 89 82 Conventional F E B F F F F B F E D AM 98 Worst -case') 175 56 16 99 120 171 99 20 111 74 48 F F A F D F F F F F B PM 120 104 162 2 246 45 197 93 156 262 143 18 a Signal timing was adjusted to accommodate the eastbound and westbound through movements to optimize traffic flow through the corridor (to match existing signal timing). M1 Strand Boulevard/Juliet Boulevard and Immokalee Road Intersection Intersection Plan View Proposed Conceptual v4„ k ♦ Add Left and _ Dedicated Right Turn Lane " "" Add Thru/Right Increase Left Turn Increase Left Turn CL Turn Lane Lane Storage Lane Storage Immokalee Rd =— - -- -- - -_ - _ _ _ _ __--- -- _--------------------- -- -- --- - -- :--------- f -- r =�-, -------------- --- - - --- --- -- --- i s s --------------------- '+ IItl11110 sW�-- ♦ n p y� Signal N y �� 74 sed Sod/ `1" cape NMI A sed Pavement) facing A - ii. C Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study from Livingston Road to Logan Boulevard Strand Boulevard/Juliet Boulevard Intersection Eliminated Alternatives Table 4-4 summarizes the capacity analysis for the alternative control strategies reviewed for AM and PM peak periods in 2040. The following describes the eliminated intersection control alternatives and the reasons they were eliminated. Displaced Left Turn: A full displaced left turn is not feasible at the intersection because of the limited available storage for displaced turn lanes along the north and southbound movements. The lack of available storage for displaced left turns northbound and southbound also eliminates the PDLT (north - south) strategy. Median U-Turn (North -South): A median U-turn is not feasible because widening the footprint along the east and westbound movements along Immokalee Road is cost -prohibitive. This also eliminated the partial median U-turn strategies. Partial Displaced Left Turn (East-West): A PUT with displaced lefts in the east -west direction is a feasible alternative. However, because of the Diverging Diamond Interchange (DDI) recommendation at the 1-75 interchange, the drivers may not anticipate displaced left turns at two adjacent intersections. In addition, the beginning of the displaced lefts in the westbound direction would not provide sufficient merging distances for vehicles in the farthest westbound lanes (1-75 SB off -ramp). In addition, the PUT would impact the adjacent shopping center access. Because conventional improvements can still provide reasonable relief, as indicated in Table 4-4, they are recommended at this intersection. Although the PUT east -west control could also be an effective strategy, it is not recommended at this location. No -Build: No improvements would result in unacceptable delays of up to 358 seconds per cycle in the AM peak period and therefore is not recommended. Table 4-4. Strand Boulevard/Juliet Boulevard - 2040 Peak Capacity Analysis Control Strategy AM Peak PM Peak Multimodal Score Overall V/C Ratio V/C Ranking Overall V/C Ratio V/C Ranking Displaced Left Turn 0.99 1 0.95 1 2.4 Median U-Turn North -South 1.07 2 1.14 4 3.1 Partial Displaced Left Turn East-West 1.09 3 1.07 2 2.4 Partial Displaced Left Turn North -South 1.10 4 1.10 3 2.4 Median U-Turn East-West 1.16 5 1.16 5 3.1 Signalized Restricted Crossing U-Turn East-West 1.21 6 1.20 6 3.1 Partial Median U-Turn East-West 1.24 7 1.22 7 3.1 Partial Median U-Turn North -South 1.34 8 1.41 9 3.1 Traffic Signal (Conventional) 1.39 9 1.36 8 2.4 Signalized Restricted Crossing U-Turn North- South 5.05 10 5.00 10 3.1 EMS Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study from Livingston Road to Logan Boulevard 4.2.3 1-75 Interchange 2025 Analysis and Recommendation Based on the projected volumes and the ICE analysis, a DDI is recommended for 2040. Coordination regarding schedule and funding will be required with FDOT. Depending on the construction timeline with FDOT and based on projected traffic volumes for 2025 (refer to Figures 4-10 and 4-11), interim conventional improvements may be recommended. Proposed 2025 interim improvements may include: ■ Redesign the existing right -turn lane for northbound and southbound off ramps to a shared turn lane servicing east and westbound turning movements onto Immokalee Road. This will allow the lane to accommodate peak traffic as it transitions between AM and PM. Add a second through/merge lane for the northbound on -ramp movement from westbound traffic off of Immokalee Road, which would require the on -ramp movement to be signalized to control this lane. This will require bridging or a headwall over or along the Cocohatchee Canal because of its proximity. This improvement would be dependent upon construction of the DDI, as it will not be needed if the DDI will be constructed in the near term. Should this improvement be pursued, the permitting, design, and construction of the additional eastbound left -turn lane at the Northbrooke Drive/Tarpon Bay Boulevard intersection is to be included as both will impact the Cocohatchee Canal along the same segment. Figure 4-12 presents the severe congestion the on -ramp experiences during peak hour. ■ Coordinate with FDOT to extend the length of the off ramps as they merge off 1-75 to assist with traffic backing up onto the 1-75 through lanes during the peak period. Extension of these ramps should not exceed past the Cocohatchee Canal for this recommendation to be cost feasible. ■ Make minor modifications to the northbound on -ramp geometry and modify the median to prohibit westbound vehicles on Immokalee Road from skipping the on -ramp entrance lanes and making illegal right turns at the signal to access the on -ramp. Interim improvements at 1-75 should be evaluated after further coordination between FDOT and the County. 1801 AM Peak 3150 4983 1833 883 0 883 n1473 1473 fl� a PM Peak 448 v 1025 2792 1937 0 5185 4884 2493 Figure 4-10. 1-75 2025 Volumes Southbound N t 0 1 1662 W E fia 1489 1 � 5180 2847 1 454 InW 5 W" 173 1 3518 10101°I 627 f 0 527 4-12 Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study from Livingston Road to Logan Boulevard 16W 0 V U 1617 AM Peak 7o-7o-F 0 1057 0 II H 1057 PM Peak o 0 0 2898 513 N 1102 3377 1712 876 N 367 1675 5233 1822 W E 2275 j 5541 5077 2689 W E i294 4720 2335 0 S 0 2164 3365 0 S 0 3045 023 � 2 1342 416 0 1 365 0 V 967 0 V 774 967 774 Figure 4-11. 1-75 2025 Volumes Northbound Figure 4-12. Severe Congestion Backup at the 1-75 On -Ramp (February 26, 2021) 2040 Analysis and Recommendation Based on the 2040 projected traffic volumes presented in Figures 4-13 and 4-14, a DDI is recommended as the ultimate (2040) solution at the 1-75 interchange. The DDI construction schedule for 1-75 will also affect the interim improvements and the timeline for the Juliet Boulevard/Strand Boulevard and Northbrooke Drive/Tarpon Bay Boulevard adjacent turn lane improvements due their proximity. Table 4-5 provides an LOS comparison between the No -Build condition and the Build (DDI). The signals associated with the DDI are identified in Table 4-5 from west to east across the interchange. The only interim improvement included in the Build condition which is summarized in Table 4-5, is the addition of the second on -ramp lane for travelers going westbound Immokalee Road to northbound 1-75. Figure 4-15 presents a concept of the proposed DDI. Figure 4-16 presents the existing and proposed typical sections. The 1-75 and Immokalee Road interchange recommendations were coordinated with FDOT as FDOT is performing the 1-75 Southwest Connect Study 1-75 South Corridor Study, which began in 2019 and includes the 1-75 and Immokalee Road interchange in the study area. The study is developing strategies for the mainline and interchanges, including managed lanes, that will improve accessibility, mobility, and safety on 1-75 in Collier and Lee Counties. The results of the study will be documented in the corridor Master plan and will help prioritize when the 1-75 and Immokalee Road interchange improvements should be done. 4-13 Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study from Livingston Road to Logan Boulevard The Collier MPO's 2045 LRTP identified a major intersection improvement for the 1-75 and Immokalee Road interchange in its Cost Feasible Plan within the years 2026 to 2030. Note: The corridor and intersection improvements will require additional water quality treatment, which was not included in the scope of this Study. The County property within the southeast quadrant of the 1-75 interchange should be evaluated to provide additional stormwater treatment required for the proposed improvements (refer to Figure 4-15). 2792 2283 n 2792 I I Q 0 2283 V 0 AM Peak 1374 0 1418 PM Peak 694 o 1589 4420 0 N 0 3756 2698 0 N 0 2237 7093 � 2156 W E 3048 7330 8996 383fi W E 2004 � 7462 2673 517 S 710 3574 4296 662 S 233 5225 a I 0^ 0 1227 4 j' JJ D 1227 Figure 4-13. 1-75 2040 Volumes Southbound AM Peak 4158 F697310 �3142 n2175 D J L 4 2175 0 F o D N W E S 1108 3 608 n D I � 1719 1719 PM Peak 1482 4542 24145 3060 7602 7011 D 3060 4527 Figure 4-14. 1-75 2040 Volumes Northbound D I0 I D n 895 I�� D 895 1421 n21 0 1 L I I 1421 D I 1375 1375 2253 6503 4250 4-14 Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study from Livingston Road to Logan Boulevard Table 4-5. 2040 Conditions: 1-75 Interchange No -Build vs. DDI LOS and Delay (sec) per Direction (2040) Overall Control Strategy Peak Hour EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Intersection Delay (sec) No -Build Southbound On/Off Ramps AM F B C E F F 171 297 16 29 56 250 281 PM F B D D F D 192 284 19 40 54 309 49 No -Build Northbound On/Off Ramps AM C D F F F F 234 23 54 149 567 608 142 PM C E F E F F 121 29 58 96 66 511 268 DDI Signal Signal2 Signal Signal Signal5 Signal6 Signal7 (Best -case') WBT NWL EBT NWT EBT SEL WBT NWL SEL SWR EBT NER WBT WBR AM D A E D A A A A F E A B A E 45 1 59 41 1 9 0 3 94 67 3 12 1 77 28 PM C A B C A A A A D F A D A E 23 1 15 32 1 7 0 2 46 84 1 37 1 69 18 DDI WBT NWL EBT NWT EBT SEL WBT NWL SEL SWR EBT NER WBT WBR (Worst- case') AM E A F D A E A A F F A C A E 78 2 92 46 1 70 2 6 237 292 1 30 4 78 78 PM C A F E A E A A F F A D A D 26 1 98 76 9 61 0 3 95 124 8 52 1 43 47 a Signal timing was adjusted to accommodate the eastbound and westbound through movements to optimize traffic flow through the corridor (to match existing signal timing). Notes: NER = northeast right, NWL = northwest left, NWT = northwest through, SEL = southeast left, SER = southeast right, SWR = southwest right 4-15 1-75 Southbound & Northbound On/Off Ramps Intersection Plan View Proposed Conceptuol ' el Traffic is a a Diverged' to �•. � � 4, , the Opposite ; G Side of the i j Redesign Lane to a r Road ''* r+ Shared East/Westbound �+ y 1 Add Second Turn Lane ' - �• Northbound On -Ramp :3 Q Lane and Signal #� Immokalee Rd r - - - -- - — _- _ - - - MV Increase Left Turn 'a Lane Storage LEGEND Traffic is r - I 'Diverged' to h' � w � * County Property SignalID,' Traffic r - the Opposite for Additional Side of the; Water Treatment Proposed o Road Landscape d Pond TBD aProposed • .�-'� •p -• - - Resurfacing-4Ik rK� dL - Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study from Livingston Road to Logan Boulevard Existing Immokalee Rd Typical Section da under 1-75 Proposed Immokalee Rd Typical Section under 1-75 "DDI" Figure 4-16. Existing and Proposed Typical Section at 1-75 Interchange 4-17 Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study from Livingston Road to Logan Boulevard 1-75 Interchange Eliminated Alternatives Table 4-6 summarizes the capacity analysis for the alternative control strategies reviewed for AM and PM peak periods in 2040. The following describes the eliminated intersection control alternatives and the reasons they were eliminated. Partial Cloverleaf A (E-W) and Partial Cloverleaf B (E-W): The partial cloverleaf interchange Type A, is recommended over Type B because of the existing pond in the southwest quadrant of the interchange, the canal system adjacent to 1-75, and impacts to adjacent properties, resulting in a significant cost variance between the two types. However, because both partial cloverleaf types construction costs are much higher than the DDI construction costs, the partial cloverleaf interchange is not recommended. Conventional: Conventional improvements would require replacement of the 1-75 overpass to include 13 Lanes under the bridge. Because innovative alternatives are feasible, this option is cost -prohibitive and was not advanced. No -Build: No improvements would result in unacceptable delays of up to 608 seconds per cycle in the AM peak period and therefore is not recommended. Table 4-6. 1-75 Interchange - 2040 Peak Capacity Analysis Control Strategy AM Peak PM Peak Multimodal Score Overall V/C Ratio V/C Ranking Overall V/C Ratio V/C Ranking Partial Cloverleaf A East-West 0.96 1 1.17 2 1.5 Partial Cloverleaf B East-West 1.02 2 1.13 1 1.5 Diverging Diamond Interchange East-West 1.16 3 1.17 2 3.3 Single Point East-West 1.22 4 1.39 4 2.4 Displaced Left Turn (Interchange) East-West 2.75 5 2.90 5 2.4 Diamond East-West 3.87 6 3.81 6 2.4 Single Point North -South 5.66 7 5.78 8 2.4 Partial Cloverleaf A North- South 5.78 8 5.70 7 1.5 Partial Cloverleaf B North -South 5.91 9 5.87 9 1.5 Displaced Left Turn (Interchange) North -South 6.28 10 6.46 10 2.4 4-18 Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study from Livingston Road to Logan Boulevard 4.2.4 Northbrooke Drive/Tarpon Bay Boulevard 2025 Analysis and Recommendation Based on projected volumes for 2025 (refer to Figure 4-17), interim improvements recommended include: ■ Add a southbound Left, through, and right -turn Lane on Northbrooke Drive. ■ Add an eastbound left -turn lane on Immokalee Road. The southbound left -turn lane storage length should also be extended. ■ Increase the Left -turn lane storage Length for the westbound left -turn movement on Immokalee Road. The recommended additional eastbound Left -turn Lane would impact the Cocohatchee Canal, which would be costly as it may require a headwall or bridging to construct. However, implementing this improvement would result in a delay reduction in each cycle of approximately 378 seconds in the AM peak worst -case scenario and 92 seconds in AM peak best -case scenario in 2040. The addition of an eastbound left -turn Lane has a constructability dependency on the DDI at 1-75 because of the proximity of the two intersections and the alignment of Lane geometry. AM Peak 336fi 5452 2086 19a6 7 IJ 316 1 V835 nL 621 VVV 402 J I. 419 PM Peak 17a 1 72152 2837 1685 281 —} 4675 473a 2442 1838 3054 371 Figure 4-17. Northbrooke Drive/Tarpon Bay Boulevard 2025 Volumes 2040 Analysis and Recommendation N UL W 15 1 1314 w E 5 307 123 110 542 J � 540 1082 1200 �? 3978 99 2664 Based on the projected traffic volumes for 2040 (refer to Figure 4-18) the ICE analysis indicated that conventional improvements were the best solution for this intersection. The recommended conventional improvements include: ■ Addition of a northbound left -turn lane, converting the existing northbound shared through/Left lane into a through only lane. ■ Addition of an eastbound left -turn lane on Immokalee Road, and extending the left -turn storage lane Lengths. Note: must be constructed to coincide with the 1-75 DDI improvements because of their proximity. Table 4-7 provides a comparison of the LOS between the No -Build condition to the recommended improvements, and Figure 4-19 provides a concept of the proposed improvements. EMK Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study from Livingston Road to Logan Boulevard 124477 n 644 .11.fi 603 438 ss 120 AM Peak 4740 3B3 N 7547 2205 w E 2807 219 5 518 1 142 1 167 424 11 1� 027 PM Peak 78 3981 2399 3711 3784 6473 6508 3232 119 2492 4109 499 1251 Figure 4-18. Northbrooke Drive/Tarpon Bay Boulevard 2040 Volumes {17fl5 509 J � � 596 225 91 193 N w E S 490 197 176 729� 863 1592 Northbrook Drive/Tarpon Bay Boulevard Intersection Eliminated Alternatives 21 1844 1684 5445 138 3601 Table 4-8 summarizes the capacity analysis for the alternative control strategies reviewed for AM and PM peak periods in 2040. The following describes the eliminated intersection control alternatives and the reasons they were eliminated. Displaced Left Turn, PUT (North -South), and PUT (East-West): Improvements with partial displaced left turns are not feasible at the intersection in the north -south direction because of the limited available storage for displacement along the north- and southbound lanes. It is also not recommended in the east - west direction because of proximity to Oakes Boulevard and the 1-75 interchange. Signalized Restricted Crossing U-Turn (East-West): There is not enough ROW for a signalized restricted crossing U-turn, and bridging over the canal would be required to allow for the additional lanes. Median U-Turn (East-West) and Partial Median U-Turn (East-West): A median U-turn is not feasible because the east- and westbound lanes cannot be widened to allow for the required median width. No -Build: No improvements would result in unacceptable delays of up to 625 seconds per cycle in the AM peak period, and therefore is not recommended. 4-20 Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study from Livingston Road to Logan Boulevard Table 4-7. 2040 Conditions: Northbrooke Drive/Tarpon Bay Boulevard No -Build vs. Conventional Control Strategy Peak Hour LOS and Delay (sec) per Direction (2040) EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Overall Intersection Delay (sec) No -Build AM F C A F F A F F C F F F 245 287 33 5 92 280 0 625 625 29 217 120 591 PM F F A F D A F F C F F D 128 158 121 7 90 40 0 394 391 26 456 119 52 Conventional (Best -case') AM F B A F F F F B E E C 74 166 17 1 107 97 121 83 11 76 75 35 PM E E C F D F F B E E B 65 72 79 25 102 45 110 94 12 80 75 11 Conventional (Worst -case') AM F C A F F F F B F F F 105 242 32 5 103 125 253 107 15 94 91 86 PM F F A F B F F D F F B 75 115 92 3 192 15 189 127 38 102 91 12 ' Signal timing was adjusted to accommodate the eastbound and westbound through movements to optimize traffic flow through the corridor (to match existing signal timing). 4-21 Northbrooke Drive/Tarpon Bay Boulevard and Immokalee Road Intersection Intersection Plan View Proposed Conceptual • � I i � is Z 0 V i,4 0 Add Left,a Right, and Increase Left Turn �e Thru Lane Add Left Increase Left Turn Lane Storage Add Thru/Ri ht Turn Lane g w r, Lane Storage Turn Lane Im okalee Rd - _ - -Q=. _ __________ ________________ ------------ --------------- LEGEND / } ➢ 00 Add Left v v � Turn Lane#` ® Traffic • !? O ResurfacingProposed Sod/ Landscape Proposed Pavement/ 4 ��,,}1 S f Hi: ,o a. •-•^- s•+°qT Fes¢ gib i b _' ♦ �'b (iJ 0 } 4 ce gar •na: i4.k i. SL- ¢ LL i olc a-.. #�, Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study from Livingston Road to Logan Boulevard Table 4-8. Northbrooke Drive/Tarpon Bay Boulevard- 2040 Peak Capacity Analysis Control Strategy AM Peak PM Peak Multimodal Score Overall V/C Ratio V/C Ranking Overall V/C Ratio V/C Ranking Displaced Left Turn 1.11 1 0.93 1 2.4 Partial Displaced Left Turn East- West 1.16 2 1.01 3 2.4 Signalized Restricted Crossing U-Turn East-West 1.30 3 1.26 9 3.1 Partial Displaced Left Turn North -South 1.37 4 1.00 2 2.4 Median U-Turn North -South 1.42 5 1.13 5 3.1 Partial Median U-Turn East- West 1.44 6 1.20 7 3.1 Partial Median U-Turn North- South 1.46 7 1.11 4 3.1 Median U-Turn East-West 1.48 8 1.16 6 3.1 Traffic Signal (conventional) 1.65 9 1.23 8 2.4 Signalized Restricted Crossing U-Turn North -South 5.05 10 4.18 10 3.1 4.2.5 Oakes Boulevard Based on projected volumes for 2025 and 2040 (refer to Figures 4-20 and 4-2 1) no improvements are recommended at this intersection. Because of the proximity of Northbrooke Drive/Tarpon Bay Boulevard and Valewood Drive intersections, major intersection improvements such as a signal is not recommended. The only improvement recommended at Oakes Boulevard is to extend the eastbound right -turn lane storage length by approximately 50 feet. This improvement should be constructed in conjunction with the Northbrooke Drive/Tarpon Bay Boulevard recommended improvement as both improvements will impact the same median. Table 4-9 provides a summary of the 2040 peak capacity analysis, and Figure 4-22 provides a concept of the proposed improvement. During the timeline of this study, the westbound left turn from Immokalee Road onto Oakes Boulevard was eliminated. The lane previously used for this westbound left -turn movement was added to the Valewood Drive eastbound left -turn lane storage. This change was incorporated into the analysis and modeled as an existing condition. 4-23 Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study from Livingston Road to Logan Boulevard 199 Lf� 197 2951 4842 < 1891 3088 4921 1833 Figure 4-20. Oakes Boulevard 2025 Volumes 279 2 it 277 2 1 0 1 0 4140 82 N 195 4333 6794 24fi7 W E 4138 �--= 6932 2654 145 S 0 1 2599 1361 4074 � 2713 790B 5716 3W8 137 25 it 112 i00 II U 142 242 191 34 �� 157 109 4145 2726 19i 5886 0 I° 1 132 1 v 1 u I 1�V l 105 � If 132 141 gQ 250 237 391 Figure 4-21.Oakes Boulevard 2040 Volumes Oakes Boulevard Intersection Eliminated Alternatives Table 4-9 summarizes the capacity analysis for the alternative control strategies reviewed for AM and PM peak periods in 2040, however because of the proximity of Northbrooke Drive/Tarpon Bay Boulevard and Valewood Drive intersections, these alternatives are not recommended. NVO Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study from Livingston Road to Logan Boulevard Table 4-9. Oakes Boulevard — 2040 Peak Capacity Analysis Control Strategy AM Peak PM Peak Multimodal Score Overall V/C Ratio V/C Ranking Overall V/C Ratio V/C Ranking Signalized Restricted Crossing U-Turn E-W 0.88 1 0.89 2 3.1 Displaced Left Turn 0.92 2 0.89 2 2.4 Median U-Turn North -South 0.92 2 0.89 2 3.1 Median U-Turn East-West 0.93 4 0.90 5 3.1 Partial Displaced Left Turn North -South 0.95 5 0.70 1 2.4 Partial Displaced Left Turn East-West 0.95 5 0.91 6 2.4 Partial Median U-Turn North -South 1.01 7 0.91 6 3.1 Traffic Signal 1.02 8 1.04 9 2.4 Partial Median U-Turn East-West 1.38 9 0.92 8 3.1 LIVAI Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study from Livingston Road to Logan Boulevard Figure 4-22. Proposed Concept of Conventional Improvement at Oakes Boulevard 4-26 Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study from Livingston Road to Logan Boulevard 4.2.6 Valewood Drive 2025 Analysis and Recommendation Based on the projected traffic volumes (refer to Figure 4-23) and the ICE analysis, no interim improvements are recommended for 2025. AM Peak 3125 26d 4942 = 1551 1017 2 791 444 II U 347 320 41 83 PM Peak N 23 2847 1400 w E 2758 4493 4150 S 56 1646 2750 37 601 12 nn 99 I i 109 208 Figure 4-23. Valewood Drive 2025 Volumes 2040 Analysis and Recommendation 796 12B � 3277 3835 Based on projected 2040 traffic volumes (refer to Figure 4-24) and the ICE analysis, conventional improvements are recommended for the southbound movement at this intersection. Improvements for the southbound movement on Valewood Drive include: ■ Use the median to add a dedicated southbound left -turn only lane ■ Restripe the through/left to a through/right-turn lane While an additional eastbound left -turn lane would reduce the AM peak delay from 177 seconds to 65 seconds (total of 112 seconds), it may not be feasible because of impacts to the canal and permitting constraints. Feasibility for evaluating roadway geometry and permitting should be further evaluated during permitting and design. Table 4-10 provides a comparison of the LOS from the No -Build condition to the recommended conventional improvements. Figure 4-25 provides a concept of the proposed improvements. Note that the corridor and intersection improvements will require additional water quality treatment, which was not included in the scope of this Study. The remaining area within the County property in the southeast quadrant of the Valewood Drive and Immokalee Road intersection should be evaluated to provide additional stormwater treatment required for the proposed improvements (refer to Figure 4-25). 4-27 Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study from Livingston Road to Logan Boulevard AM Peak 4347 370 6896 2177 2549 2 I1060 562 J fT 496 405 52 105 N W E S PM Peak 32 3994 1941 3884 6295 5801 2301 3860 58 I 96 I 1 19 132 f I I�173 305 Figure 4-24. Valewood Drive 2040 Volumes Table 4-10. 2040 Conditions: Valewood Drive No -Build vs. Conventional 1os4 544 540 169 I � 317 486 ,!!1649 5369 3720 LOS and Delay (sec) per Direction (2040) Overall Control Strategy Peak Hour EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT/R SBL SBT SBR Intersection Delay (sec) No -Build AM F B A F F A F E F F 220 14 0 99 320 0 143 60 150 291 210 PM F F A F D A F E F D 334 195 0 90 41 0 206 58 86 39 149 Conventional AM F B A F F F F F E B (Best -cased) 223 16 0 104 120 145 80 188 72 14 90 PM E F A F D F F F F B 65 109 0 146 39 118 136 190 88 14 88 Conventional AM F D A E F F F F F C (Worst -cased) 257 53 0 79 127 180 114 230 153 20 110 PM F F A F C F F F F B 97 135 0 174 28 123 196 212 113 14 106 d Signal timing was adjusted to accommodate the eastbound and westbound through movements to optimize traffic flow through the corridor (to match existing signal timing). 4-28 Valewood Drive and Immokalee Road Intersection Intersection Plan View MEM Proposed Conceptual _FI I z _ _ 0; l .@]-1 Tl-f J it - k .,1 _ � � f 04 rn '.a s Add Dedicated O- W Left Turn Lane G L" _ " --- C- Add Thru/Right �- 1 Restripe as a through I I Turn Lane right turn lane " Immokalee Rd - -- - - --- - - - - -- - - - -- - - ----- - - - - -- _ - -------------- -- ---------------------_-_---_-- - _ -- - - --- ------------------- ' County Property for •4 • . , rr, Expanding Water jjj-- A` Treatment Pond TBDFit, R .►f * T' LEGEND I; • --x-+ '{ J' ..r .e7►1�. Vic$ yE ter. - Traffic signal N Proposed Sod/ A Landscape - - _ Pavement/Proposed Resurfacing ��g�' E43 '' X `' lUi O '' pt, f I. 4_1ti1�ti , . � y `,`• : Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study from Livingston Road to Logan Boulevard Valewood Drive Intersection Eliminated Alternatives Table 4-11 summarizes the capacity analysis for the alternative control strategies reviewed for AM and PM peak periods in 2040. The following describes the eliminated intersection control alternatives and the reasons they were eliminated. Displaced Left Turn, PUT (East-West), and PUT (North -South): Displaced left turns are not feasible because of the proximity of the adjacent intersections and lack of available area for left -turn storage. Median U-Turn and Partial Median U-Turn (North -South): A median U-turn is not feasible because the east- and westbound lanes cannot be widened to allow for the required median width. No -Build: No improvements would result in unacceptable delays of up to 334 seconds per cycle during the PM peak period, and therefore is not recommended. Table 4-11. Valewood Drive — 2040 Peak Capacity Analysis Control Strategy AM Peak PM Peak Multimodal Score Overall V/C Ratio V/C Ranking Overall V/C Ratio V/C Ranking Partial Displaced Left Turn East-West 1.04 1 0.91 3 2.4 Displaced Left Turn 1.04 1 0.83 1 2.4 Median U-Turn North -South 1.10 3 0.95 5 3.1 Partial Displaced Left Turn North -South 1.13 4 0.89 2 2.4 Median U-Turn East-West 1.14 5 1.07 8 3.1 Partial Median U-Turn East- West 1.14 5 1.03 7 3.1 Partial Median U-Turn North- South 1.17 7 0.94 4 3.1 Signalized Restricted Crossing U-Turn East-West 1.18 8 0.96 6 3.1 Traffic Signal (Conventional) 1.19 9 1.07 8 2.4 4.2.7 Executive Drive Based on projected volumes for 2025 and 2040 (refer to Figures 4-26 and 4-27), no improvements are recommended at this intersection. Because of its proximity to and interconnectivity with Valewood Drive, no improvements are recommended at this intersection. Executive Drive Intersection Eliminated Alternatives Table 4-12 summarizes the capacity analysis for the alternative control strategies reviewed for AM and PM peak periods in 2040. Because of its proximity to with Valewood Drive, improvements with displaced left turns, median U-turns, and traffic signals (continuous green T) are not feasible. 4-30 Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study from Livingston Road to Logan Boulevard zaa 23 0 6 I 2885 24 N 197 3059 1160 4577 1668 W E 2 662 4727 3864 1692 0 S 0 1668 2704 0 110 0 0 J �� 0 c Figure 4-26. Executive Drive 2025 Volumes 366 29 H 326 4257 6757 25M 1709 14 $962 5703 b 3goo 3994 0 0 4� 0 0 Figure 4-27. Executive Drive 2040 Volumes Table 4-12. Executive Drive — 2040 Peak Capacity Analysis 111 15 ,V u 96 0 VU 0 0 159 19 ,v Q 140 19 0 0 N W E S 0 0 0 o g� o 0 1231 � 3925 2694 126 1816 1690 5796 0 3980 Control Strategy AM Peak PM Peak Multimodal Score Overall V/C Ratio V/C Ranking Overall V/C Ratio V/C Ranking Partial Displaced Left Turn East-West 0.88 1 0.82 5 2.4 Displaced Left Turn 0.88 1 0.80 3 2.4 Median U-Turn N-S 0.88 1 0.81 4 3.1 Partial Displaced Left Turn North -South 0.90 4 0.82 5 2.4 Continuous Green T North 0.91 5 0.36 1 1.5 Partial Median U-Turn North -South 0.91 5 0.82 S 3.1 Signalized Restricted Crossing U-Turn East-West 0.92 7 0.79 2 3.1 CM11 Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study from Livingston Road to Logan Boulevard 4.2.8 Logan Boulevard 2025 Analysis and Recommendation Because of the recent Logan Boulevard Turn Lane Improvements project (construction completed in 2020), no interim improvements are recommended for 2025 (refer to Figure 4-28 for projected volumes). This recent project widened the bridge and added a southbound left -turn lane and a southbound through Lane. 1006 662 595 H 411 450 4� 432 PM j27 AM Peak 202 164 1411 f03 239 108 3182 196 N 125 3048 1309 N L 1501 4930 ? 1379 W E 2633 d742 d002 W E 4356 1748 173 S 290 1694 2693 S 2a55 267 90 166 176 207 499 621 � l E n 523 930 � I � 882 1150 1B12 Figure 4-28. Logan Boulevard 2025 Volumes 2040 Analysis and Recommendation Based on the 2040 projected traffic volumes (refer to Figure 4-29) and the ICE analysis, the recommended improvement for 2040 is a PUT east -west. The PUT east -west will support the 2040 traffic volumes provided that the lower projected traffic volumes or best -case scenario occurs. Should the worst -case scenario occur, the PUT would likely result in delays of up to 276 seconds per cycle in PM peak hour and may not be effective. The worst -case scenario traffic volumes may require evaluation of a full displaced left turn. Should the displaced left turn no longer accommodate traffic volumes (post 2040), it is recommended to evaluate a grade -separated overpass. Table 4-13 provides a comparison of the LOS and delay (seconds) between the No -Build condition and the Build (PDLT). r7 1I606 �14115� 975 II� 611 738 II II 677 AM Pej255 462 268 245 PM Peak 169 392 W 4976 N 194 4720 2051 247 N 90 2323 7557 W E 4077 7274 6029 3320 VV E 1594 6639 2581 S 449 2554 3978 411 S 639 4316 437 148 272 288 n340 819 972 9 4 857 1442 I 1447 1629 2689 Figure 4-29. Logan Boulevard 2040 Volumes 4-32 Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study from Livingston Road to Logan Boulevard Table 4-13. 2040 Conditions: Logan Boulevard No -Build vs. PUT LOS and Delay (sec) per Direction (2040) Overall Control Strategy Peak Hour EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Intersection Delay (sec) No -Build AM F E B F F B F E D F F 89 58 20 143 372 12 173 80 47 198 262 248 226 PM F F A F C A F F F F F D 108 1 165 1.2 1 461 31 1 2 254 1 103 770 1 426 411 1 39 224 PDLT West Signal East Signal North Signal (Best-casea)EBL EBT WBT SWR EBT WBL WBT NER EBL NBT SBT SBR AM D A E E C D A D D C E A 49 1 64 79 26 54 3 50 39 30 63 1 38 PM D A C C D D A F E A E A 35 1 27 34 41 42 1 117 62 8 63 1 27 South Signal Center Signal WBL NBT NBR SBT EBT EBR WBT WBR NBL NBT SBL SBT AM D E A C B A E A E B B B 44 62 1 25 20 6 75 3 70 12 19 14 PM E E A B C A B A D B C B 60 62 1 17 33 7 10 1 55 16 31 18 PDLT West Signal East Signal North Signal (Worst -cased) EBL EBT WBT SWR EBT WBL WBT NER EBL NBT SBT SBR AM D A E F B E D F D C E A 55 1 79 170 14 69 49 80 48 31 71 1 65 PM D D C D F E A F E B E A 45 42 29 49 153 57 1 296 67 13 77 1 72 South Signal Center Signal WBL NBT NBR SBT EBT EBR WBT WBR NBL NBT SBL SBT AM D E A E B A F A F C D F 49 70 1 67 17 5 134 6 214 27 37 187 PM F E D E F A B A F C F D 91 74 52 66 80 10 12 1 166 35 138 49 a Signal timing was adjusted to accommodate the eastbound and westbound through movements to optimize traffic flow through the corridor (to match existing signal timing). 4-33 Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study from Livingston Road to Logan Boulevard The Collier MPO's 2045 LRTP identified a major intersection improvement at the Immokalee Road and Logan Boulevard intersection in its Cost Feasible Plan within the years 2031 to 2045. Note that partial displaced left turns on Immokalee Road may impact the Logan Landings Plaza access east of Logan Boulevard. Further evaluation of the feasibility and impacts to the Logan Landings Plaza to construct a free -flow northbound right turn onto Immokalee Road is recommended during design. The free -flow right turns associated with the PDLT concept are recommended. Eliminating the free -flow northbound right -turn lane increases the delay from approximately 7 seconds to 383 seconds in the afternoon, which results in increased delays at the other movements to compensate for the time needed for the northbound right -turn movement. Figure 4-30 provides a proposed concept to implement the northbound right turn, with signal control at the Logan Landings Plaza access. Logan Boulevard Intersection Eliminated Alternatives Table 4-14 summarizes the capacity analysis for the alternative control strategies reviewed for AM and PM peak periods in 2040. The following describes the eliminated intersection control alternatives and the reasons they were eliminated. Diverging Diamond Interchange (North -South): This alternative results in an overall V/C ratio of less than 1. However, because of the bridging required, the PDLT has significantly lower construction costs, and therefore a DDI was eliminated. Additionally, the DDI would require ROW acquisition. Single Point Urban Interchange (North -South): This alternative results in an overall V/C ratio less than 1. However, because of the bridging required, the PDLT has significantly lower construction costs, and therefore a SPUI was eliminated. Additionally, the SPUI would require ROW acquisition. Conventional: Ten eastbound through lanes and six westbound through lanes would be needed to support 2040 volumes, which is not cost-effective or feasible. Therefore, this control strategy was eliminated as an alternative. No -Build: No improvements would result in unacceptable delays of up to 770 seconds per cycle in the PM peak period, and therefore the No -Build is not recommended. 4-34 Logan Boulevard and Immokalee Road Intersection Intersection Plan View Proposed Conceptual IWO rLAI t } fa;" Channelize Ri ht Turn LaneS Left Turn Lanes L.►� Cross to Opposite V Side of Roadway V ; >. -• Immokalee Rd' 2 - ------------------- - = _ - ________________ - _ - - -- - .....1 ..-J y .. .... ��I'-�.' ..• w JRi� - yi Left Turn Lanes ,,� • �' , a� Cross to Opposit #LEGVEND e i Traffic Side of Roadway • Channefize Right Turn Lane Proposed •• Landscape Proposed Pavement/ Resurfacing '4 - - Im�ok lee -Rd i Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study from Livingston Road to Logan Boulevard Table 4-14. Logan Boulevard - 2040 Peak Capacity Analysis Control Strategy AM Peak PM Peak Multimodal Score Overall V/C Ratio V/C Ranking Overall V/C Ratio V/C Ranking Diverging Diamond Interchange North -South 0.61 1 0.86 1 3.3 SPUI North -South 0.62 2 0.89 2 2.4 Displaced Left Turn 1.06 3 1.04 3 2.4 Partial Displaced Left Turn North -South 1.17 4 1.38 8 2.4 Displaced Left Turn (Interchange) East-West 1.20 5 1.21 5 2.4 SPUI East-West 1.23 6 1.27 6 2.4 Partial Displaced Left Turn East-West 1.24 7 1.18 4 2.4 Partial Median U-Turn North- South 1.26 8 1.43 10 3.1 Diverging Diamond Interchange East-West 1.39 9 1.27 6 3.3 4.3 Roadway Network Improvements Because of the severity of congestion within this study area, further evaluation of the surrounding roadway network is recommended to identify local roadway connectivity improvements that would help alleviate traffic volumes along the project corridor. Several network improvements are identified and are recommended for further analysis to determine feasibility and constructability. Increasing network connectivity and implementing access management improvements will result in less vehicles using Immokalee Road and reduce peak hour volumes. These network improvements are recommended in addition to the proposed corridor and intersection recommendations. 4.3.1 Adaptive Traffic Signal Control The County's Traffic Operations division plans to include an adaptive traffic signal control (ATSC) system along the Immokalee Road corridor operable by November 2021. The ATSC system is planned to include 15 signalized intersections along Immokalee Road from Collier's Reserve Drive/Creekside Way to Collier Boulevard (approximately 6.6 miles), which includes the intersections within this study area. An ATSC system will coordinate and adjust signal timing to optimize traffic flow. An ATSC system works by reducing 'stop -and -go' traffic and gradually moves vehicles through green lights as they progress along the main corridor. It distributes the intersection signals' green time as needed to smooth flow along the mainline and reduce intersection delays. ATSC collects real-time data through video detection installed at the major intersections so that it can better manage unpredictable delays, such as traffic incidents, and optimize traffic flow based real-time conditions (FHWA 2021). 0M Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study from Livingston Road to Logan Boulevard This Study finds that an ATSC system is an effective solution to relieve congestion along the project corridor. 4.3.2 Logan Boulevard Network Connectivity Study An additional study is recommended to evaluate the benefits of connecting local roadways to Logan Boulevard and Tarpon Bay Boulevard to reduce congestion on Immokalee Road (refer to Figure 4-31). The street connections to evaluate include: ■ Connecting to Logan Boulevard: Autumn Oaks Lane, Hidden Oaks Lane, Spanish Oaks Lane, Golden Oaks Lane, Standing Oaks Lane, and Shady Oaks Lane ■ Connecting to Tarpon Bay Boulevard: Autumn Oaks Lane and Hidden Oaks Lane immoN Autumn Oaks LN H ddUakSl V NJ m Spanish Oaks LN co c a a o � Gald n Oaks LN 0 87` 1.750 Legend MEN== O Suggested Improvement Location Feet Figure 4-31. Possible Connections for Connectivity 4.3.3 Livingston Road Network Management Improvements Study An additional study is recommended to evaluate access management options for reducing peak hour volumes, such as: ■ Adding a left -turn lane (with U-turn capability) into Aston Gardens for vehicles traveling northbound on Livingston Road (until the construction of the proposed overpass). ■ Connecting Livingston Road to Windsong Club south of the intersection. Evaluation of access management changes will also include connections between developments such as Bermuda Palms and Windsong Club (refer to Figure 4-32). 4-37 Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study from Livingston Road to Logan Boulevard Figure 4-32. Network Management Improvement Locations 4.3.4 Modify the Northbrooke Drive and Oakes Boulevard Connection Modify the intersection by redesigning the intersection geometry to reduce the radius of curvature at the connection point. 4.3.5 Target Shopping Center Access Improvements Modifying the shopping plaza access at the southwest quadrant of the Immokalee Road and Tarpon Bay Boulevard intersection is recommended improve safety and reduce congestion. It is recommended to evaluate modifying the plaza's northernmost access off Tarpon Bay Boulevard from full access to a right - in only. This change would accommodate future traffic growth when the queuing at the Tarpon Bay Boulevard and Immokalee Road intersection blocks access. 4-38 Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study from Livingston Road to Logan Boulevard 5. Conclusions and Costs Numerous control strategies were evaluated to relieve congestion along Immokalee Road from Livingston Road to Logan Boulevard. There will be a significant reduction in delays as a result of the proposed improvements. Table 5-1 presents the anticipated percent reduction in the average intersection delay from the No -Build to the Build scenario in 2040. Table 5-1. 2040 Projected Reductions in Intersection Delay Intersection with Immokalee Road Overall Intersection Delay (minutes) % Reduction in Intersection Delay from No -Build to Build No -Build Build AM PM AM PM AM PM Livingston Road 8.0 8.2 2.5 2.4 68% 71% Strand Boulevard/Juliet Boulevard 3.2 2.8 1.6 2.0 49% 28% 1-75 Southbound Intersection 2.9 3.2 0.7 0.8 75% 74% 1-75 Northbound Intersection 3.9 2.0 1.8 0.8 55% 63% Northbrooke Drive/Tarpon Bay Boulevard 4.1 2.1 1.8 1.3 57% 41% Valewood Drive 3.5 2.5 1.8 1.8 48% 29% Logan Boulevard 3.8 3.7 1.1 1.2 71% 68% Note: Average intersection delay takes a weighted average of the delays for each movement at the intersection. Although specific movements may experience significant delays, it may not be reflected in the overall intersection delay. The Build scenario included worst -case traffic volumes. The interim (2025) and ultimate (2040) recommendations for each intersection/interchange are summarized on Table 5-2 summarizes the recommendations presented herein. The proposed recommendations will not impact the local transit system. Further coordination with FDOT is needed to determine schedule and funding for the 1-75 interchange improvements and its adjacent intersection improvements. For each intersection alternative, preliminary engineering along with an assessment of environmental impacts (social, natural, cultural, and physical) are needed to evaluate lane geometry, ROW impacts, permitting feasibility (canal impacts and water quality treatment), and construction costs. Mail Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study from Livingston Road to Logan Boulevard Table 5-2. Final Recommendations Summary Recommendation Intersection or Segment By 2025 By 2040 Segment Livingston Road to Restripe/modify the Immokalee Road westbound right -turn Logan Boulevard lane and shoulder area to a combination through/right-turn lane from west of Logan Boulevard to east of Livingston Road. Note: Includes miscellaneous intersection improvements. Intersection Livingston Road Construct a grade -separated overpass with Livingston Road over A four -lane, grade -separated overpass will be constructed with Immokalee Road. Livingston Road over Immokalee Road. Construct triple left -turn Only if overpass construction is postponed, include Livingston Lanes for southbound on Livingston Road. Provide channelized right - northbound and southbound free -flow right -turn lanes (with turn lanes for northbound and southbound on Livingston Road. yield). Construct Livingston Road northbound and southbound Construct at -grade northbound through lane. Evaluate the addition triple left -turn lanes onto Immokalee Road. of dual northbound right -turn lanes and an at -grade southbound through lane during design. Strand Boulevard/ Conventional improvements: Add southbound left and Conventional improvements: Increase storage lane lengths for Juliet Boulevard dedicated right -turn lane. Increase storage lane lengths for the westbound left -turn lanes on Immokalee Road. eastbound left -turn lanes on Immokalee Road and the Note: Must be constructed with 1-75. northbound left turn lane on Juliet Boulevard. I-75 Interchange Interim may include: Restripe northbound and southbound off- Construct a DDI. Coordinate with FDOT. Timing (TBD) depends on ramp(s) right -turn lanes as a shared RT/LT Lane. Add second FDOT's 1-75 Southwest Connect 1-75 South Corridor Study. westbound on -ramp right -turn lane to 1-75 northbound with ramp signal. Extend length of 1-75 northbound and southbound off ramps. Northbrook Conventional improvements: Add southbound left-, right -turn, Conventional Improvements: Add a northbound left -turn lane, Drive/Tarpon Bay and through lanes. Increase storage lane lengths for the converting the existing northbound shared through/left lane into Boulevard westbound left -turn lane on Immokalee Road. through only. Add an eastbound left -turn lane on Immokalee Road and extend the storage lane lengths. Note: must be constructed with the 1-75 DDI improvements. 5-2 Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study from Livingston Road to Logan Boulevard Table 5-2. Final Recommendations Summary Recommendation Intersection or Segment By 2025 By 2040 Oakes Boulevard Extend the eastbound right -turn lane storage by 50 feet in N/A conjunction with the extension of the westbound right -turn lanes onto Tarpon Bay Boulevard. Valewood Drive N/A Conventional improvements: Add a dedicated southbound right -turn Lane. Restripe the through/left-turn lane as a through/right-turn Lane. Executive Drive N/A Logan Boulevard Optimize signal timing after the Logan Boulevard Turn Lane Construct a PDLT (East-West). Note: Partial Displaced Lefts impact Improvements project. Logan Landings Plaza access on Immokalee Road and shall be further evaluated. 5-3 Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study from Livingston Road to Logan Boulevard Table 5-3 provides estimated (planning level) construction costs for the recommended improvements. Construction costs were based on FDOT's Statewide Twelve Month Historical Moving Averages (January 2020 to December 2020) except where Collier County costs were known. These costs do not include permitting and mitigation, stormwater treatment, land acquisition/ROW, public utility relocations, Landscaping. Table 5-3. Planning Level Cost Estimates for Ultimate (2040) Improvements Estimated Construction Project Limits Total Cost Corridor Improvements (New Westbound Immokalee Road from Livingston Road to Logan $10M 'Combination' Through/Right-Turn Lane) Blvd Livingston Road Overpass Livingston Road and Immokalee Road Intersection $38M Strand Boulevard/Juliet Boulevard Strand Boulevard/Juliet Boulevard and Immokalee $1.5M Intersection Improvements Road Intersection 1-75 Diverging Diamond Interchange Immokalee Road and 1-75 Interchange (does not $9M include second through/merge lane for the northbound on -ramp) Northbrooke Drive/Tarpon Bay Boulevard Northbrooke Drive/Tarpon Bay Boulevard and $6M Intersection Improvements + Oakes Immokalee Road Intersection, and Oakes Boulevard Extension of Eastbound Left Boulevard Eastbound Left Turn Lane Turn Lane Valewood Drive Intersection Valewood Drive and Immokalee Road Intersection $300k Improvements Logan Boulevard (Partial Displaced Left Logan Boulevard and Immokalee Road $17.5M Turn) Intersection Note: Costs do not include permitting and mitigation, stormwater treatment, land acquisition/ROW, public utility relocations, and landscaping. M-1 Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study from Livingston Road to Logan Boulevard 6. Public Involvement An important aspect of this Study included public outreach and participation to engage stakeholders on the proposed recommendations. Collier County contacted multiple stakeholders including adjacent business owners, homeowner's associations (HOAs), North Naples Fire District, the FDOT, nearby public and private schools, the Collier County Sheriff's office, and the general public. Because of the COVID-19 Pandemic, public outreach was modified to accommodate the stay-at-home orders in place at the time of this Study and the Centers for Disease Control and the Department of Health recommendations for social distancing. The project was kicked off by updating the Collier County Transportation Planning Division's website,' with detailed project information including an overview of the proposed improvements for each of the intersections/interchange within the project limits. Continued website updates were performed as the Study progressed and additional details became available. A copy of the project website including the posted materials, is included in Appendix E.1. Initial stakeholder outreach was performed mostly through electronic notifications, including email blasts, commissioner newsletters, and a social media campaign through the Collier County social media sites. Table 6-1 summarizes the Study notifications. As of July 14, 2021, project notification outreach through social media resulted in the following, • Facebook: 51,888 people reached , 5,606 engagements, 295 likes, and 103 shares • Twitter: 1 retweet, 3 likes • Nextdoor: 15,869 impressions, 95 comments, 20 reactions. Appendix E.2 includes a copy of the notifications. Table 6-1. Study Notifications Notification To Date Project Notification Email Distribution to Local Collier County Schools (public and private), April 8, 2021 Officials Sheriff's Office, North Naples Fire and Rescue, Collier County Emergency Medical Services Project Notification Email to Collier MPO Included FDOT District 1 Community April 16, 2021 Citizens Advisory Committee Liaison, Victoria Peters Project Notification Email to Collier County April 19, 2021 Commissioners HOAs, adjacent property and business March 22, 2021 Project Notification Email Distributions to owners (where emails were available) April 14, 2021 Adjacent Property Owners with Survey Link April 29, 2021 Project Notification via Social Media with Link Facebook (5 posts), Twitter (2 posts), and March — June 2021 to Project Website Nextdoor 3 http://co Uiercountyfl.00v/p[an ningstud ies M51 Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study from Livingston Road to Logan Boulevard Notification To Date Project Notification Email Distribution to Local Collier County Schools (public and private), April 8, 2021 Officials Sheriff's Office, North Naples Fire and Rescue, Collier County Emergency Medical Services Project Notification Email to Collier MPO Included FDOT District 1 Community April 16, 2021 Citizens Advisory Committee Liaison, Victoria Peters Project Notification Email to Collier County April 19, 2021 Commissioners Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study HOAs, adjacent property and business May 14, 2021 Virtual Public Information Meeting Question & owners (where emails were available) near Answer Session the Livingston Road intersection, and Nextdoor Project Notification Email Distribution in Collier MPO distribution list including July 9, 2021 Collier MPO's monthly Newsletter Committee members, staff/agency members, and advisor network An overview of the Study was provided to the Collier County Board of County Commissioners (BCC). Commissioner Penny Taylor (District 4) provided information on the project through the District 4 Newsletter dated April 21, 2021. Commissioner Burt Saunders hosted a District 3 Town Hall Meeting on March 2S, 2021, where the Collier County Transportation Planning Division presented the Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study recommendations and preliminary concept plans for each recommendation. A recording of the Town Hall is available on Collier Television 4. Additionally, Commissioner Andy Solis (District 1) hosted a Coffee with a Commissioner meeting, on July 20, 2021, where the Collier County Transportation Planning Division presented the Study recommendations (refer to Figure 6-1). Appendix E.2 includes the distributed and presented information by the commissioners. Figure 6-1. Coffee with Commissioner Andy Solis 4 http://tv.collierciov.net/CabLecastPubLicSite/show/1118?channel=1 Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study from Livingston Road to Logan Boulevard Coordination meetings were held with County staff to discuss the ICE results and preliminary concepts/improvements on February 12, 2020, March 26, 2020, and December 22, 2020 (virtual). Virtual meetings were held between FDOT and the Study team on April 2, 2021, May 7, 2021, and May 26, 2021 to discuss traffic modeling and the 1-75 interchange recommendation. As noted earlier, FDOT is conducting the 1-75 Southwest Connect 1-75 South Corridor Study which includes the interchange at Immokalee Road and 1-75. FDOT noted that they would prioritize the 1-75 and Immokalee Road interchange improvements within their study's Master Plan. The FDOT study is expected to release the first draft report of the Master Plan in early 2022. Further coordination is needed between FDOT and the County to discuss interim improvements to the 1-75 and Immokalee Road interchange, as well as prioritization of the ultimate interchange improvements. Meeting agendas and summaries from coordination meetings are available in Appendix E.3. In March 2021, a project video presentation was uploaded to the project website along with an online survey. The video included a study overview and the proposed improvements for each intersection/interchange. The County encouraged stakeholders to complete the survey after watching the video presentation. Appendix EA provides the video presentation slides and script. A link to the study video and survey was included in the project notification to nearby homeowners associations (HOAs) and property/business owners (where emails were known), the Collier County website, and Collier County's social media sites (Facebook and Twitter). On April 30, 2021, members of the Study team attended a meeting with the Carlton Lakes HOA to discuss preliminary design and access management details associated with the Livingston Road and Immokalee Road intersection. Numerous questions and comments were received by County staff regarding the recommended alternative (an overpass) for this intersection, that included concerns related to access management changes, aesthetic impacts, and noise impacts. Therefore, the County hosted the Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study Virtual Public Meeting Question & Answer Session on May 27, 2021 at 6 PM, which was tailored specifically to the Immokalee Road/Livingston Road intersection improvements. A meeting notification was emailed on May 14, 2021 to nearby residential and property owners (where email addresses were known), as well as to nearby HOAs. The County encouraged the public to submit questions ahead of the public meeting either through the registration site or by emailing the County Project Manager, Lorraine Lantz, to facilitate answering as many questions as possible. The public meeting began with introductions and housekeeping items by the moderator, then an overview of the study was provided. Pre -registered comments were then summarized, and pre -registered questions were answered and discussed. Additionally, Study team staff members answered questions sent through the chat box throughout the panel discussion. Microsoft Teams was used as the virtual meeting format, and Eventbrite was used to register meeting participants. A total of 171 people registered for the meeting. A total of 90 people joined the virtual public meeting. During the meeting 73 questions or comments were received through the meeting chat box. The Study team answered as many questions as possible during the meeting. Appendix E.4 includes the virtual public meeting invitation, a summary of meeting registrants, meeting slides, a summary of meeting attendees, as well as a summary of meeting questions and responses via the chat box. As a result of the meeting, the Study team developed a list of Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) and access management slides that detailed access management changes at each of the intersections/interchange. The FAQs and access management slides were uploaded to the project website and emailed to the stakeholder list developed for the project as a result of all public outreach. Appendix E.1 includes the FAQs and the access management slides. The study survey was open from March 2021 through July 2021. A total of 829 people participated in the survey. Approximately 67 percent of respondents noted that they live within one mile of the study corridor, while 21 percent noted that they work within one mile of the study corridor. Over 87 percent M-3 Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study from Livingston Road to Logan Boulevard responded that they are a year-round resident. Approximately 65 percent of respondents noted that they use the project corridor every day and 27 percent use it once a week. Over 50 percent of the respondents heard about the Study through social media. Almost half of the respondents had driven through an existing DDI. Almost 60 percent of the respondents use the Livingston Road intersection daily while over 35 percent use it weekly. Over 40 percent of respondents use one more of the intersections along the corridor daily and 36 to 46 percent use the intersections along the corridor weekly. Figure 6-1 presents the results of the survey question, "How often do you use the intersections within this study area?" Appendix E.5 includes the results of the online survey. Additionally, comments and questions were received throughout the Study. The Collier County Project Manager responded to all questions. Appendix E.6 presents a summary of all public comments and questions received as well as responses. Q5 How often do you use the intersections within this study area? An —red. His skippf3d LO a. Livingston Rd_1 I h. I- IIl[efehan c. Logan Bhd. In[ersec[ion d. One or mor 1 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 501K 90% 1001r. � Eve-y day � Ac L.-L I 1 a1 � Ar iCe 11,o .Y Figure 6-2. Survey Response to Intersections Used Within Corridor During the study, some communities along the project corridor performed their own outreach within their neighborhoods. Since April, the Livingston Lakes condominium association has included a link to the project survey on their website's message board. The Carlton Lakes Master Association posted a graphic of proposed improvements at the Livingston Road intersection in their August 2021 newsletter, and included a BCC schedule update. On March 26, 2021, WINK News published an article that provided a brief overview about the Study (WINK News 2021). The article noted the recommendation at 1-75 and Livingston Road and encouraged W Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study from Livingston Road to Logan Boulevard residents to complete the online survey on the project's website. WINK News published an additional article and aired a story on April 21, 2021, that discussed the project, encouraged additional public outreach, and included an interview with the Collier County Project Manager Lorraine Lantz. In the interview, Ms. Lantz noted that the study results are expected to be presented to the BCC before the summer and if approved, improvements can be planned. Appendix E.7 includes the notifications from the communities and media articles related to the study. Additional stakeholder outreach included a meeting with the Collier County Sheriff's Office on April 22, 2021, to discuss the proposed improvements and safety concerns. There were no major concerns from the Sheriff's Office representatives, but requested an update on access management changes once they were confirmed. On July 27, 2021 a meeting was held with the executive director at Aston Gardens to discuss proposed access management changes and improvements. Meeting minutes are provided in Appendix E.4. Public involvement and outreach should continue as each of the intersections/interchange included in the study progress to the next phase of development. In particular, changes to access management as a result of the proposed improvements at the Livingston Road and Immokalee Road intersection will require additional public involvement as the design is further refined. As a result of the public outreach, several public comments were received questioning if the Livingston Road/Immokalee Road overpass would still be recommended if a new 1-75 interchange was constructed at Vanderbilt Beach Road. This interchange is not currently a programmed improvement. However, it is under evaluation through FDOT's Southwest Connect 1-75 South Corridor Study, and may be constructed in the future if the study recommends a new interchange at 1-75 and Vanderbilt Beach Road. As such, a rough analysis was performed in coordination with FDOT, to determine if projected traffic volumes would still warrant the proposed Livingston Road/Immokalee Road overpass, if the Vanderbilt Beach Road/1-75 connection was made. The analysis was performed by coding an interchange at 1-75 and Vanderbilt Beach Road in the D1 RPM (Version 2). To assess the impact of this interchange, future (2045) traffic volumes along Livingston Road, Immokalee Road, 1-75, and Vanderbilt Beach Road were observed with and without the proposed 1-75/Vanderbilt Beach Road interchange. The analysis indicated that future (2045) traffic volumes at the Livingston Road/Immokalee Road intersection warrant an overpass, regardless of a connection at 1-75 and Vanderbilt Beach Road. Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study from Livingston Road to Logan Boulevard 7. References CH2M, Inc. 2015. Traffic Safety Fundamentals Handbook. Prepared for Minnesota Department of Transportation Office of Traffic, Safety and Technology. June. https://www.dot.state.mn.us/stateaid/trafficsafety/reference/2015-mndot-safety-handbook-large.pdf Collier County. "Traffic Counts." 2019. Accessed December 2019..https://www.coLLiercountyfL.aov/your- govern ment/divisions-s-z/traffic-operations/traff ic-counts Collier County. 2020. ANNUAL UPDATE & INVENTORY REPORT/CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT SCHEDULE UPDATE ON PUBLIC FACILITIES 2020 AUIR/CIE. Prepared by Comprehensive Planning Section Zoning Division Growth Management Department. Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT). 2019. "ICE Training Materials." Accessed December 2019. https://www.fdot.clov/traffic/trafficservi ces/ice-training-materials Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles (FLHSMV). 2011. INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETING THE FLORIDA UNIFORM TRAFFIC CRASH REPORT FORMS 2010 to Present HSMV 90010S. State of Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles. February. https://www.nhtsa.gov/sites/nhtsa.dot.clov/fites/ documents/fl crash manual 2010 sub5 2011.12df Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT). 2021. Florida Traffic Online (2019). Accessed August 30, 2019. https://tdaappsprod.dot.state.fl.us/fto/ Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT). 2020. Intersection Operations and Safety. Accessed September 5, 2019. https://www.fdot.gov/traffic/TrafficServices/Intersection-Operations.shtm RoadSafeGIS. 2019. "Collision Database Management System". Accessed December 17, 2020. https://roadsafeciis.com/collision-database-management-system/ Stantec Consulting Service Inc. 2015. COLLIER 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan. December. Prepared for: Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization. U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). 2020. Adaptive Signal Control Technology. Accessed April 13, 2021. https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/innovation/everydaycounts/edc- 1 /asct.cfm U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). 2020. Intersection Control Evaluation. Accessed April 27, 2020. https://safety.fhwa.dot.ciov/intersection/ice/ WINK News. 2021. "Collier County studying traffic congestion on Immokalee Road, looking for solutions." April 21. https://www.winknews.com/2021/04/2 1 /collier-county-studying-traffic-congestion-on- immokalee-road-looking-for-solutions/ rail Appendix A Crash Data Gl Immokalee Rd & Livingston Rd Crash Trendline (2014 - 2018) 80 4 U) V) a) 60 3 Ln Ln 2 � j 40 2 v 0 20 ♦ 1 > ♦ i ♦ ♦ ♦ a) cn ` _ 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total Crashes (269) — — Severe Crashes (2) Immokalee Rd & Livingston Rd Crash Type (2014 - 2018) 100% Ln 80% 60% U 40% ra 20% +-+ 0% — — `1 Q�11 ,�c1 �1 `�1 �1 �t�� arm oy'� CJ� �p4� \/ac,� z q ��, ■ Total Crashes (269) ■ Severe Crashes (2) Immokalee Rd & Livingston Rd Crash Severity (2014 -2018) Im ■ Fatal (0) AM Major Injury (2) - Minor Injury (8) Possible Injury (27) Property Damage Only (232) Legend A Project Limits IIntersection Locations 1#1 Ln 50 N 40 u 30 0 20 ~ 10 0 Immokalee Rd & Strand Blvd/Juliet Blvd Crash Trendline (2014 - 2018) 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total Crashes (246) — — Severe Crashes (1) C Immokalee Rd & I-75 SB Ramp 1 Terminal Crash Trendline (2014 - 3 2018) V) 40 4 2 f 30 3 U20 Ln 2U 1 > N o 10 ��♦ ��` 1 > 0 ~ 0 �' ♦..� �♦ 0 Cl) 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total Crashes (118) — — Severe Crashes (2) Immokalee Rd & Strand Blvd/Juliet Blvd Crash Type (2014 - 2018) 100% 80% 60% � j 40% 20% ' 0% - - - �t�1 a`ti1 p�1 h1 6 �1 aa6 0°J,ZI� ao � va ■ Total Crashes (246) ■ Severe Crashes (1) Immokalee Rd & Strand Blvd/Juliet Blvd Crash Severity (2014 - 2018) ■ Fatal (o) - Major Injury (1) - Minor Injury (8) Possible Injury (25) = Property Damage Only (212) maps f •. - s _ =s Immokalee Rd & I-75 SB Ramp Terminal Crash Type (2014 - 2018) 100% 80% � 60% � j 40% ro 20% 0% � ■ _ �� Q3 aaa aa�� a. faro JN o� +za \, Qa ■ Total Crashes (118) ■ Severe Crashes (2) Immokalee Rd & I-75 SB Ramp Terminal Crash Severity (2014 - 2018) ■ Fatal (0) _ Major Injury (2) L Minor Injury 7 J ry( ) Possible Injury (16) = Property Damage Only (93) 1 7 111115�M1 J1 Immokalee Rd & I-75 NB Ramp Terminal Crash Trendline (2014 - 2018) 40 4 Ln Ln 30 3 Ln Ln U20 2U v fu 0 10 ♦ 1 > ♦ de ♦ do♦ U) 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total Crashes (103) — — Severe Crashes (2) Immokalee Rd & I-75 NB Ramp Terminal Crash Type (2014 - 2018) 100% 80% 60% � j 40% 20% ' 0% - - - - - ' as ('aO duo (a �- Qa6 ,§ r� �O a �� a Jam, J ■Total Crashes (103) ■Severe Crashes (2) C Immokalee Rd & I-75 NB Ramp Terminal Crash Severity (2014 - 2018) ■ Fatal (1) Major Injury (1) - Minor Injury (8) Possible Injury (12) Property Damage Only (81) V. } $<r 1 .fi i � aanR E .81 40 a U Immokalee Rd & Northbrooke Dr/Tarpon Bay Blvd Crash Trendline (2014 -2018) 3 V) 2 v) 2 U OD20 ♦— — — — — —— 1 a) 0 ♦� 0 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total Crashes (211) — — Severe Crashes (4) Immokalee Rd & Northbrooke Dr/Tarpon Bay Blvd Crash Type (2014 -2018) 100% Ln 80% cn 60% U40% 20% (O Qa �aa C�s�a J� ■ Total Crashes (211) ■ Severe Crashes (4) Immokalee Rd & Northbrooke Dr/Tarpon Bay Blvd Crash Severity (2014 - 2018) ■ Fatal (2) Major Injury (2) A& - Minor Injury (12) Possible Injury (18) = Property Damage Only (177) ,� °Fee, IMMOKALEE ROAD CORRIDOR CONGESTION STUDY �"�eYCO"—`y F Immokalee Rd & Oakes Blvd Crash Trendline (2014 - 2018) 30 3 LO Ln 25 N � Ln 20 2 2 ID U u 15 10 1 5 Ln 0 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total Crashes (87) — — Severe Crashes (0) Immokalee Rd & Oakes Blvd Crash Type (2014 - 2018) U) 100% 80% In 60% U 40% 20% 0% 12 �eti1��a`ad -12;`p J' �1�a�`�a��1J�3oaa`1`1l1 �Pr`c`�` g Iea�J�O ■ Total Crashes (87) ■ Severe Crashes (0) Immokalee Rd & Oakes Blvd Crash Severity (2014 - 2018) ■ Fatal (0) I - Major Injury (0) Minor Injury (4) Possible Injury (6) ■ Property Damage Only (77) po z : Legend Project Limits Intersection Locations M,M 30 a 25 Ln 20 22 U 15 10 Immokalee Rd & Valewood Dr Crash Trendline (2014 - 2018) 3 a� - 2 Ln U 00 ♦ 1ell > 5 de Ln 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total Crashes (89) — — Severe Crashes (1) Immokalee Rd & Valewood Dr Crash Type (2014 - 2018) W 100% 80% 60% 12 U 40% M 20% 0% Ot``-) Q, F`�, �`�1 a`c1 aa�ao-,�o�,��J� ■Total Crashes (89) ■Severe Crashes (1) Immokalee Rd & Valewood Dr Crash Severity (2014 - 2018) ■ Fatal (0) Major Injury (1) Minor Injury (3) Possible Injury (11) ■ Property Damage Only (74) w �-. 4•Ali r 4� F r ..^: sit`" ',•, .t-. Q..V.. H Immokalee Rd & Palazzo Dr/Executive Dr Crash Trendline (2014 - 2018) 10 3 En 8 Ln `n 6 2 Ln 2 (2 U U � 4 1 a� � 2 Ln 0 — — — — — — — — — — — 0 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total Crashes (19) — — Severe Crashes (0) Immokalee Rd & Palazzo Dr/Executive Dr Crash Type (2014 - 2018) 100% a) 80% m 60% �j 40% - 20% 0% �`FP aaOt`O��yO��y eFr\L�, J`Jtt` Qai, �aa 40 �� ■ Total Crashes (19) ■ Severe Crashes (0) w Immokalee Rd & Palazzo Dr/Executive Dr Crash Severity (2014 - 2018) ■ Fatal (0) ■ Major Injury (0) Minor Injury (3) Possible Injury (1) - Property Damage Only (15) Immokalee Rd & Logan Blvd Crash Trendline (2014 - 2018) 40 4 0) 30 3 Ln � j 20 2 U 010------- 1 > ~ cn 0 —�� 0 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 Total Crashes (125) — — Severe Crashes (3) Immokalee Rd & Logan Blvd Crash Type (2014 -2018) 100% 80% 60% � j 40% rp 20% H0% ■ - - - - �� QT o�oa �aaaa00�°`�C aaatt�r�C ■ Total Crashes (125) ■ Severe Crashes (3) Immokalee Rd & Logan Blvd Crash Severity (2014 - 2018) ■ Fatal (0) ■ Major Injury (3) Minor Injury (8) Possible Injury (15) ■ Property Damage Only (99) 30% 25% 0 Immokalee Rd Crashes from Livingston T Rd to Logan Blvd 20 /o 15% 10% % 0NWU ' a _ 0 la �Ja a` a aA ��a Ot Ot 46fat-°a� Oa`��0 a\e*°°a +eGJ°�e°�aa0 5�taaa �� mot°°fie Qa\atitio ti S ,gyp ■Total Crashes (1,267) ■Severe Crashes (15) Immokalee Rd Crashes from Livingston Rd W 300 269 246 to Logan Blvd v 250 211 N 200 � j 150 118 103 87 89 125 00 0 150 19 � 0 5�0� \.a�0 �at�•` �at�` �at� �� O y�00 too �1P to h h r �a ■Total Crashes (1,267) Immokalee Rd Severe Crashes from Livingston Rd to Logan Blvd 5 4 24 3 cn 2 2 2 2 ~ 0 0 0 Q.. a t a ��a a Severe Crashes (15) 1111111111W�: ii ° 225 'S° IMMOKALEE ROAD CORRIDOR CONGESTION STUDY c"ri�'C"""`y Feet Appendix B Traffic Count Data & Traffic Projections Appendix B.1 Traffic Counts Type of peak hour being reported: Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour: Total Entering Volume LOCATION: Livingston Rd -- Immokalee Rd QC JOB #: 14799101 CITY/STATE: Naples, FL DATE: Thu, Mar 7 2019 1819 7309 Peak -Hour: 7:45 AM -- 8:45 AM 4.9 7.1 + * 543 933 443 Peak 15-Min: 7:45 AM -- 8:00 AM + " 3.9 6.2 3.6 L ✓ + 4 ✓ + 4 2782 t 348 J t 408 t 2762 4.9 4.6 J \ t 7.4 t 5.4 921 + 1936 6 .6.- 4.5.2 1448 + 1791 C 418 o. 1757 5.7 + 6.1 i C 45 + 5.2 340 561 *9 5.2 7 8.4 5.6 1411 1230 Quality Counts 4 5B 6.7 DATA THAT DRIVES COMMUNITIES 0 6 0 L 0, t 0 0 4 t 0+ . 2 0 F_ -1 1 � 0 i r 0 * r O 1 1 NA i t, 4. ,? NA NA NA NA NA NA + t 15-Min Count Period Livingston Rd (Northbound) Livingston Rd (Southbound) Immokalee Rd (Eastbound) Immokalee Rd (Westbound) Total Hourly Totals Beginning At Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U 7:00 AM 29 70 53 1 59 125 55 0 31 183 39 1 55 365 61 7 1134 7:15 AM 40 95 72 0 72 234 80 1 41 228 31 3 79 406 87 5 1474 7:30 AM 57 95 59 1 73 233 114 1 67 236 70 3 100 469 82 6 1666 7:45 AM 72 143 83 2 101 210 134 0 85 237 40 7 112 497 115 12 1850 6124 8:00 AM 80 147 92 5 127 200 126 1 92 199 39 1 84 473 115 6 1787 6777 8:15 AM 77 141 97 2 108 215 147 1 76 227 45 1 98 464 94 10 1803 7106 8:30 AM 64 130 87 8 105 208 136 0 85 258 55 1 88 502 84 8 1819 7259 8:45 AM 1 55 107 87 4 115 202 130 1 64 286 37 2 81 467 76 14 1728 7137 Peak 15-Min Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Flowrates Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Total All Vehicles 288 572 332 8 404 840 536 0 340 948 160 28 448 1988 460 48 7400 Heavy Trucks 16 32 8 8 44 24 20 68 8 24 84 28 364 Pedestrians 0 0 0 8 8 Bicycles 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 Railroad Stopped Buses Comments: Report generated on 4/1/2019 12:28 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) 1-877-580-2212 Page 1 of 1 Type of peak hour being reported: Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour: Total Entering Volume LOCATION: Livingston Rd -- Immokalee Rd QC JOB #: 14799102 CITY/STATE: Naples, FL DATE: Thu, Mar 7 2019 1646 2102 Peak -Hour: 4:15 PM -- 5:15 PM 6.1 4.5 * 43L 6 940 370 Peak 15-Min: 4:15 PM -- 4:30 PM 6 5.4 9.2 S I L .04 4 .04 4 1732 t 435 J t 840 t 2166 3.9 4. 2.5 \ t 6A t 4.7 19000. la914 4.1094 3.8.6. - r 3.7 2560 + 225 1 C 232 o. 2720 a: 3.7 + 4.9 i C 2.6 + 45 201 827 4*4 F 3.53.8 1270 1452 Quality Counts 4 4.9 3A DATA THAT DRIVES COMMUNITIES J 1 1 1 J 0 1 0 L J a 0 t0 0 1 t 2+ 2 p � 1 � 0 z r 0 � * r o 0 0 NA NA �� 4.,� �, 4.t NA,..�NA }�"�'�� rrrr� 4F NA NA 15-Min Count Period Livingston Rd (Northbound) Livingston Rd (Southbound) Immokalee Rd (Eastbound) Immokalee Rd (Westbound) Total Hourly Totals Beginning At Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U 4:00 PM 43 156 104 0 94 143 91 0 123 499 55 0 74 285 160 7 1834 4:15 PM 55 256 123 0 98 193 89 0 128 490 60 0 62 279 234 8 2075 4:30 PM 53 205 107 0 110 213 105 1 121 486 61 1 55 254 250 8 2030 4:45 PM 51 233 122 0 76 209 105 0 101 430 52 0 46 255 194 6 1880 7819 5:00 PM 42 133 72 0 85 225 137 0 84 494 52 0 42 306 162 5 1839 7824 5:15 PM 63 228 110 1 125 235 124 0 83 349 49 0 68 256 137 7 1835 7584 5:30 PM 59 274 131 1 105 260 138 0 80 351 47 0 57 265 95 10 1873 7427 5:45 PM 64 223 126 0 121 232 101 0 90 460 73 0 45 243 101 10 1889 7436 Peak 15-Min Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Flowrates Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Total All Vehicles 220 1024 492 0 392 772 356 0 512 1960 240 0 248 1116 936 32 8300 Heavy Trucks 4 12 16 32 28 4 12 112 12 4 36 92 364 Pedestrians 0 4 0 4 8 Bicycles 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Railroad Stopped Buses Comments: Report generated on 4/1/2019 12:28 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) 1-877-580-2212 Page 1 of 1 Type of peak hour being reported: Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour: Total Entering Volume LOCATION: Juliet Blvd -- Immokalee Rd QC JOB #: 14799103 CITY/STATE: Naples, FL DATE: Tue, Mar 26 2019 362 517 Peak -Hour: 8:00 AM -- 9:00 AM 4.1 3.7 * 219 79 124L Peak 15-Min: 8:15 AM -- 8:30 AM + * 4.1 5.3 4 I L .1+ L. .0+ �. 2772 t 247 > t 289 t 2798 5.4 t 1.2 j \ t 55 t 5.6 1405 o. t 2369 6.3.6. - r 5.7 1808+ 1561 C 140 o. 1616 5.4b. 3.8j. C5.7b. 5.9 �1=3 23 � 0 3.8 � * 308 245 Quality Counts +5.6 4.9 45 DATA THAT DRIVES COMMUNITIES J 0 0 0 L 0 4 L J 1 + � 1 i t � 1 F_ -1 0 1,C 0 * I- 0 0 0 NA i ♦ NA o. NA 1 NA i . ■ L 4.NA + T r � NA NA + * 15-Min Count Period Juliet Blvd (Northbound) Juliet Blvd (Southbound) Immokalee Rd (Eastbound) Immokalee Rd (Westbound) Total Hourly Totals Beginning At Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U 7:00 AM 27 2 22 0 21 2 21 0 16 252 15 8 19 443 39 0 887 7:15 AM 38 6 17 0 18 4 39 0 20 279 24 11 24 499 43 2 1024 7:30 AM 46 8 28 0 21 4 45 0 25 307 19 17 29 565 43 2 1159 7:45 AM 43 8 27 0 25 3 56 0 28 375 30 11 25 604 64 1 1300 4370 8:00 AM 36 10 15 0 33 2 54 0 47 323 38 8 31 568 74 1 1240 4723 8:15 AM 1 35 6 22 1 29 4 59 0 59 376 47 11 36 617 61 2 1365 5064 8:30 AM 37 3 30 0 30 9 44 0 48 330 39 7 28 574 71 1 1251 5156 8:45 AM 34 4 12 0 32 4 62 0 51 376 32 16 37 610 83 4 1357 5213 Peak 15-Min Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Flowrates Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Total All Vehicles 140 24 88 4 116 16 236 0 236 1504 188 44 144 2468 244 8 5460 Heavy Trucks 8 0 4 0 4 12 4 84 8 8 124 16 272 Pedestrians 0 0 0 0 0 Bicycles 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 2 Railroad Stopped Buses Comments: Report generated on 4/1/2019 12:28 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) 1-877-580-2212 Page 1 of 1 Type of peak hour being reported: Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour: Total Entering Volume LOCATION: Juliet Blvd -- Immokalee Rd QC JOB #: 14799104 CITY/STATE: Naples, FL DATE: Tue, Mar 19 2019 553 424 Peak -Hour: 4:15 PM -- 5:15 PM 1.3 1.4 + * 4 261 251 41 L Peak 15-Min: 4:30 PM -- 4:45 PM + 15 4.9 0.4 L 4 + 4 1986 t 221 > t 187 1948 2.1 4. 0 j \ t 2.1 t 2.3 2247 + Fo-%] 4. 1538 1.7.6. - r 2.3 2810 + 342 1 C 223 o. 2681 1.5 .6.0.9 i C 2.2 .6.1.6 172 33 *1� � a 6.1 1.8 596 376 Quality Counts 1.7 2.1 DATA THAT DRIVES COMMUNITIES � 0 0 0 L 0 t 2 i Y L 0� 1 t L 0 . 2 1 � -1 1 1 ~ � 1 i C 0 * r � 0 0 0 NA + > t ♦ ! 4 NA ; ` NA NA o • ` NA } NA NA + * 15-Min Count Period Juliet Blvd (Northbound) Juliet Blvd (Southbound) Immokalee Rd (Eastbound) Immokalee Rd (Westbound) Total Hourly Totals Beginning At Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U 4:00 PM 52 7 37 0 60 10 54 0 54 523 74 4 62 344 59 4 1344 4:15 PM 45 7 40 0 66 12 63 0 50 559 91 7 31 347 47 0 1365 4:30 PM 41 13 41 1 56 9 59 0 67 575 78 5 69 415 49 4 1482 4:45 PM 46 7 42 1 64 10 67 0 43 547 94 2 56 399 50 5 1433 5624 5:00 PM 38 6 48 0 65 10 72 0 44 566 79 3 55 377 41 3 1407 5687 5:15 PM 36 9 32 0 70 10 70 0 40 565 68 2 44 348 37 4 1335 5657 5:30 PM 28 6 36 0 45 6 68 0 42 585 76 7 57 404 40 4 1404 5579 5:45 PM 41 4 38 0 49 7 59 0 47 555 73 6 63 352 49 2 1345 5491 Peak 15-Min Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Flowrates Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Total All Vehicles 164 52 164 4 224 36 236 0 268 2300 312 20 276 1660 196 16 5928 Heavy Trucks 4 8 0 0 0 12 0 24 0 4 52 8 112 Pedestrians 0 0 0 4 4 Bicycles 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 Railroad Stopped Buses Comments: Report generated on 4/1/2019 12:28 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) 1-877-580-2212 Page 1 of 1 Type of peak hour being reported: Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour: Total Entering Volume LOCATION: 1-75 SB Ramps -- Immokalee Rd QC JOB #: 14799105 CITY/STATE: Naples, FL DATE: Thu, Mar 7 2019 1557 0 Peak -Hour: 7:45 AM -- 8:45 AM 13 0 + * 766 0 791L Peak 15-Min: 7:45 AM -- 8:00 AM + s.4 o v.4 I .0+ L. .0+ L. 2838 t 0 J L 0 2555 5.1 4. 0; I L 0 3.4 1310 + [U]7 t 2072 6 r r 3.9 1624 + 314 1 r 483 o. 2102 a: 5 r 1 i r 1.7 + 10.3 0 0 0 0 0 + * 796 0 Quality Counts + 1A 0 DATA THAT DRIVES COMMUNITIES J r 0 0 + 6 0� Lo 0 0 0 + 4.0 -1 3 F_ 0 1 r 0 0 0 0 F NA + t NA NA ■ * NA NA + NA 15-Min Count Period 1-75 SB Ramps (Northbound) 1-75 SB Ramps (Southbound) Immokalee Rd (Eastbound) Immokalee Rd (Westbound) Total Hourly Totals Beginning At Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U 7:00 AM 0 0 0 0 188 2 154 0 0 213 82 0 117 360 0 0 1116 7:15 AM 0 0 0 0 195 0 196 0 0 250 91 0 159 405 0 0 1296 7:30 AM 0 0 0 0 191 0 198 0 0 293 101 0 141 490 0 0 1414 7:45 AM 0 0 0 0 197 0 194 0 0 323 90 0 128 539 0 0 1471 5297 8:00 AM 0 0 0 0 197 0 162 0 0 322 79 0 125 520 0 0 1405 5586 8:15 AM 0 0 0 0 194 0 197 0 0 320 74 0 112 496 0 1 1394 5684 8:30 AM 0 0 0 0 203 0 213 0 0 345 71 0 117 517 0 0 1466 5736 8:45 AM 0 0 0 0 202 0 194 0 0 343 87 0 110 500 0 0 1436 5701 Peak 15-Min Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Flowrates Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Total All Vehicles 0 0 0 0 788 0 776 0 0 1292 360 0 512 2156 0 0 5884 Heavy Trucks 0 0 0 132 0 52 0 72 0 12 52 0 320 Pedestrians 4 0 0 0 4 Bicycles 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Railroad Stopped Buses Comments: Report generated on 4/1/2019 12:28 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) 1-877-580-2212 Page 1 of 1 Type of peak hour being reported: Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour: Total Entering Volume LOCATION: 1-75 SB Ramps -- Immokalee Rd QC JOB #: 14799106 CITY/STATE: Naples, FL DATE: Thu, Mar 7 2019 1273 0 Peak -Hour: 5:00 PM -- 6:00 PM 4.2 0 * 387 1 885 L Peak 15-Min: 5:00 PM -- 5:15 PM + 3.1 0 4.7 I .1+ L. .0+ , 1750 0> t 0 t 1521 - 3.5 0 j \ t o t 3.6 2209 o. � 4.1363 2.7.6. r 3.6 2611 + 402 1 C 158 o. 3099 a: 2.5 + 1.5 i C 3.8 b. 3.3 0 0 0 0 0 0 556 0 Quality Counts 2.2 0 DATA THAT DRIVES COMMUNITIES 0 0 J J + � 0, L 0 0� 0 4— 1 t j .0 3 F_ 0 i C 0 0 0 0 J + y NA J + y L J i ♦ NA o. 4, NA J 1 NA o. • L t NA + 15-Min Count Period 1-75 SB Ramps (Northbound) 1-75 SB Ramps (Southbound) Immokalee Rd (Eastbound) Immokalee Rd (Westbound) Total Hourly Totals Beginning At Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U 4:00 PM 0 0 0 0 107 0 75 0 0 567 117 1 43 397 0 0 1307 4:15 PM 0 0 0 0 138 0 103 0 0 516 118 6 29 412 0 0 1322 4:30 PM 0 0 0 0 163 1 80 0 0 527 136 3 26 368 0 2 1306 4:45 PM 0 0 0 0 189 0 100 0 0 501 109 0 30 379 0 1 1309 5244 5:00 PM 0 0 0 0 203 1 85 0 0 528 113 0 52 414 0 0 1396 5333 5:15 PM 0 0 0 0 208 0 96 0 0 550 120 0 34 341 0 1 1350 5361 5.30 PM 0 0 0 0 242 0 100 0 0 540 101 0 41 308 0 1 1333 5388 5:45 PM 0 0 0 0 232 0 106 0 0 591 68 0 26 300 0 3 1326 5405 Peak 15-Min Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Flowrates Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Total All Vehicles 0 0 0 0 812 4 340 0 0 2112 452 0 208 1656 0 0 5584 Heavy Trucks 0 0 0 56 0 12 0 72 12 0 52 0 204 Pedestrians 0 0 0 0 0 Bicycles 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Railroad Stopped Buses Comments: Report generated on 4/1/2019 12:28 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) 1-877-580-2212 Page 1 of 1 Type of peak hour being reported: Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour: Total Entering Volume LOCATION: 1-75 NB Ramps -- Immokalee Rd QC JOB #: 14799107 CITY/STATE: Naples, FL DATE: Thu, Mar 7 2019 0 1478 Peak -Hour: 7:45 AM -- 8:45 AM 0 87 1+ * Peak 15-Min: 8:30 AM -- 8:45 AM + 1 L � + 4L + 2592 t 469 j L 1008 3090 3.6 t 9.8 j\ L 8.2 4.5.1 1668 + � 4.2082 12A r � - r 3.7 2137 + 0 1 r 0+ 1948 11.8 + 0 '1.r 0+ 11A �540 1 280� 0 5.4 0 791 Quality I Counts 4 0 4.2 DATA THAT DRIVES COMMUNITIES � J 0 0 0 L J + L. 1 1 Y L 0 j L 0 0* 1 2 � 1 0 1 r 0 � * r 0 0 0 NA 4.j t + j 1� L + NA o C NA + r r NA o . NA qr r NA NA + 15-Min Count Period 1-75 NB Ramps (Northbound) 1-75 NB Ramps (Southbound) Immokalee Rd (Eastbound) Immokalee Rd (Westbound) Total Hourly Totals Beginning At Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U 7:00 AM 90 0 34 0 0 0 0 0 89 321 0 1 0 401 206 0 1142 7:15 AM 104 0 53 0 0 0 0 0 109 329 0 0 0 471 238 0 1304 7:30 AM 132 0 45 0 0 0 0 0 110 378 0 0 0 503 246 0 1414 7:45 AM 140 0 77 0 0 0 0 0 114 422 0 0 0 532 216 0 1501 5361 8:00 AM 129 0 63 0 0 0 0 0 121 406 0 0 0 517 269 0 1505 5724 8:15 AM 129 0 72 0 0 0 0 0 114 409 0 0 0 508 263 0 1495 5915 8:30 AM 1 112 1 68 0 0 0 0 0 120 431 0 0 0 525 260 0 1517 1 6018 8:45 AM 97 0 74 0 0 0 0 0 102 445 0 1 0 502 247 0 1468 1 5985 Peak 15-Min Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Flowrates Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Total All Vehicles 448 4 272 0 0 0 0 0 480 1724 0 0 0 2100 1040 0 6068 Heavy Trucks 12 0 4 0 0 0 40 192 0 0 88 100 436 Pedestrians 4 0 0 0 4 Bicycles 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 Railroad Stopped Buses Comments: Report generated on 4/1/2019 12:28 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) 1-877-580-2212 Page 1 of 1 Type of peak hour being reported: Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour: Total Entering Volume LOCATION: 1-75 NB Ramps -- Immokalee Rd QC JOB #: 14799108 CITY/STATE: Naples, FL DATE: Thu, Mar 7 2019 0 962 Peak -Hour: 5:00 PM -- 6:00 PM 0 6.1 a * 0 0 0 Peak 15-Min: 5:00 PM -- 5:15 PM + * 0 0 0 + L. ✓ + a 1530 t 618 j t 348 t 1532 3.5 6 j \ t 6.3 t 3.9 2461o. Fo-%] 4.1184 3.7r - 4.3.1 3079 + 0 1 C 0 o. 2752 4.2 + 0 1 C 0+ 3.6 �342 o 2*1� o 2.1 � 0 633 Quality Counts + 0 3.6 DATA THAT DRIVES COMMUNITIES 0 0 0 J J + L. 0 0 n L 0 ! 2+ i 0 + 0 0 � 1 0 1,C 0 0 0 0 NA NA + j ! ♦ ! 4 } NA ' 4. NA + r r NA , • 4. NA NA NA + * 15-Min Count Period 1-75 NB Ramps (Northbound) 1-75 NB Ramps (Southbound) Immokalee Rd (Eastbound) Immokalee Rd (Westbound) Total Hourly Totals Beginning At Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U 4:00 PM 107 0 87 0 0 0 0 0 100 523 0 11 0 309 77 0 1214 4:15 PM 120 0 64 0 0 0 0 0 38 563 0 11 0 275 21 0 1092 4:30 PM 114 0 76 0 0 0 0 0 52 616 0 3 0 258 23 0 1142 4:45 PM 106 1 87 0 0 0 0 0 94 570 0 6 0 294 45 0 1203 4651 5:00 PM 107 0 107 0 0 0 0 0 119 603 0 1 0 371 75 0 1383 4820 5:15 PM 83 0 65 0 0 0 0 0 133 612 0 0 0 278 87 0 1258 4986 5.30 PM 75 0 65 0 0 0 0 0 162 630 0 1 0 284 74 0 1291 5135 5:45 PM 77 0 54 0 0 0 0 0 200 616 0 2 0 251 112 0 1312 5244 Peak 15-Min Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Flowrates Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Total All Vehicles 428 0 428 0 0 0 0 0 476 2412 0 4 0 1484 300 0 5532 Heavy Trucks 16 0 12 0 0 0 32 112 0 0 32 12 216 Pedestrians 0 0 0 0 0 Bicycles 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Railroad Stopped Buses Comments: Report generated on 4/1/2019 12:28 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) 1-877-580-2212 Page 1 of 1 Type of peak hour being reported: Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour: Total Entering Volume LOCATION: Tarpon Bay Blvd -- Immokalee Rd QC JOB #: 14799109 CITY/STATE: Naples, FL DATE: Thu, Mar 7 2019 484 400 Peak -Hour: 8:00 AM -- 9:00 AM 2.1 1.8 + ! 336 56 92 Peak 15-Min: 8:15 AM -- 8:30 AM + ! 2.1 5.4 0 1 L + L. + 4 2999 t 262 J L 59 2529 4.6 t 2.3 ;\ L 1.7 4-4.8 1525 + � 4.2389 12.7.6. � - r 4.9 1950 + 163 1 C 81 + 1703 10.6 r 4.9 1 C 3.7 + 11A �245 79 86 0 1.2 301 440 Quality Counts + ! 4.7 3.2 DATA THAT DRIVES COMMUNITIES 0 0 0 L 0 0 J� n L 0 L 0 0 1 4 F_ -1 1 � 0 1 C 0 ! r 1 0 0 NA 4. NA + NA NA 0. ■ t NA + i C + i C r NA NA 15-Min Count Period Tarpon Bay Blvd (Northbound) Tarpon Bay Blvd (Southbound) Immokalee Rd (Eastbound) Immokalee Rd (Westbound) Total Hourly Totals Beginning At Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U 7:00 AM 48 13 5 0 15 4 44 0 34 282 30 0 7 541 16 0 1039 7:15 AM 62 8 9 0 22 7 57 0 37 285 19 0 5 597 15 0 1123 7:30 AM 75 9 8 0 21 10 87 0 54 338 34 0 5 627 7 0 1275 7:45 AM 66 17 22 0 22 16 72 0 66 388 38 0 18 577 5 0 1307 4744 8:00 AM 71 19 15 0 23 18 109 0 66 363 23 0 22 618 7 0 1354 5059 8:15 AM 61 23 31 1 24 13 65 0 66 382 39 0 22 619 16 0 1362 5298 8:30 AM 78 17 21 0 19 16 77 0 62 367 49 0 14 613 22 0 1355 5378 8:45 AM 64 20 19 0 26 9 85 0 68 413 52 0 23 539 14 0 1332 5403 Peak 15-Min Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Flowrates Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Total All Vehicles 244 92 124 4 96 52 260 0 264 1528 156 0 88 2476 64 0 5448 Heavy Trucks 20 0 0 0 4 8 4 196 16 8 112 0 368 Pedestrians 12 0 0 0 12 Bicycles 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Railroad Stopped Buses Comments: Report generated on 4/1/2019 12:28 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) 1-877-580-2212 Page 1 of 1 Type of peak hour being reported: Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour: Total Entering Volume LOCATION: Tarpon Bay Blvd -- Immokalee Rd QC JOB #: 14799110 CITY/STATE: Naples, FL DATE: Thu, Mar 7 2019 375 365 Peak -Hour: 5:00 PM -- 6:00 PM 2A 1A + * 166142L Peak 15-Min: 5:00 PM -- 5:15 PM + I L a .0 a ~1 1518+ 257 J L 13 + 1182 4.5 + 1.2\ L 15.4+ 5.1 2199 + la914 4.1080 4.1.6. - + 5.3 2795 + 339 1 C 89 + 2439 33 r 0 i C 1.1 r 3.8 �262 105 � 3 0 * 491 461 Quality Counts 0.4 1.3 DATA THAT DRIVES COMMUNITIES 4=* 0 0 0 _1.P 6L j\ 0 ` 0 '+ y V t 0 L 0 2+ 4.0 e F_ -1 1 � 0 1 C 0 � * r o 0 0 NA + + NA NA ■ + NA NA NA 15-Min Count Period Tarpon Bay Blvd (Northbound) Tarpon Bay Blvd (Southbound) Immokalee Rd (Eastbound) Immokalee Rd (Westbound) Total Hourly Totals Beginning At Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U 4:00 PM 66 35 29 0 42 23 83 0 68 449 68 2 18 327 4 0 1214 4:15 PM 36 22 33 0 27 20 68 0 59 469 79 8 20 177 2 1 1021 4:30 PM 46 15 29 0 43 27 65 0 70 496 101 13 13 153 1 1 1073 4:45 PM 54 23 34 0 54 22 60 0 65 478 92 4 14 202 2 2 1106 4414 5:00 PM 50 30 21 0 33 18 67 0 78 573 88 4 23 288 3 0 1276 4476 5:15 PM 77 22 24 0 42 20 31 0 59 555 75 3 18 255 3 1 1185 4640 5.30 PM 60 25 26 0 28 13 37 0 54 534 89 2 27 280 2 3 1180 4747 5:45 PM 75 28 23 0 39 16 31 0 56 537 87 1 17 257 5 0 1172 4813 Peak 15-Min Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Flowrates Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Total All Vehicles 200 120 84 0 132 72 268 0 312 2292 352 16 92 1152 12 0 5104 Heavy Trucks 4 0 0 4 0 16 4 132 0 4 32 0 196 Pedestrians 0 0 0 0 0 Bicycles 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Railroad Stopped Buses Comments: Report generated on 4/1/2019 12:28 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) 1-877-580-2212 Page 1 of 1 Type of peak hour being reported: Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour: Total Entering Volume LOCATION: Oakes Blvd -- Immokalee Rd QC JOB #: 14799111 CITY/STATE: Naples, FL DATE: Thu, Mar 7 2019 1 166 Peak -Hour: 7:45 AM -- 8:45 AM 0 6.6 1 * 1 0 0L Peak 15-Min: 8:00 AM -- 8:15 AM + * 0 0 0 + .+ + r 2599 t 52 j t 125 t 2779 5.2 t 3.8 ,t L 7.2 t 5.2 1582 o. Fo-991 t 2587 10.9 r r 5.2 1701 + 67 1 C 67 o. 1642 10.6 r 7.5 i C 1.5 r 10.9 a o 60� o 10 � 135 61 Quality I Counts +0 4.4 9.8 DATA THAT DRIVES COMMUNITIES J 0 0 0 L J� 0 0 n L 0 t 0 o � �, . o o � 1 � 0 1 C 0 � * r o 0 0 NA J 4.j J + yNA t i L NA o. NA NA o. ■ t NA + i C + i C r NA NA + 15-Min Count Period Oakes Blvd (Northbound) Oakes Blvd (Southbound) Immokalee Rd (Eastbound) Immokalee Rd (Westbound) Total Hourly Totals Beginning At Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U 7:00 AM 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 306 6 0 10 586 8 1 927 7:15 AM 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 2 336 11 0 21 658 12 0 1047 7:30 AM 0 0 18 0 0 0 0 0 1 345 12 0 21 657 19 0 1073 7:45 AM 0 0 17 1 0 0 0 0 15 394 24 0 19 612 32 0 1114 4161 8:00 AM 0 0 16 0 0 0 1 0 3 398 14 3 19 659 35 0 1148 4382 8:15 AM 0 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 9 395 16 4 14 660 32 0 1143 4478 8:30 AM 0 0 14 0 0 0 0 0 14 395 13 4 15 656 26 0 1137 4542 8:45 AM 0 0 19 0 0 0 0 0 16 438 18 2 18 540 23 0 1074 4502 Peak 15-Min Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Flowrates Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Total All Vehicles 0 0 64 0 0 0 4 0 12 1592 56 12 76 2636 140 0 4592 Heavy Trucks 0 0 12 0 0 0 0 192 0 4 136 12 356 Pedestrians 0 0 0 0 0 Bicycles 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Railroad Stopped Buses Comments: Report generated on 4/1/2019 12:28 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) 1-877-580-2212 Page 1 of 1 Type of peak hour being reported: Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour: Total Entering Volume LOCATION: Oakes Blvd -- Immokalee Rd QC JOB #: 14799112 CITY/STATE: Naples, FL DATE: Thu, Mar 7 2019 23 10o Peak -Hour: 5:00 PM -- 6:00 PM o 7 + * zz o 1L Peak 15-Min: 5:00 PM -- 5:15 PM + * 0 0 0 L + 4 + 4 1195 t 26 > t 74 t 1276 2326 4.9 0 j 3.7.6. \ t 95 t 5.2 r 4.9 + Fo-%] 4.1172 2442 + 90 1 C 30 o. 2442 a: 3.8 r 7.8 1 C 3.3 .6.3.7 0 0 116 0 0 2.6 120 116 QuaLity Counts 6.7 2.6 DATA THAT DRIVES COMMUNITIES 4=* 0 0 0 L 0 0 t 0 , 2 r t 0 4.0 0 1,C 0 0 0 0 NA o. t NA NA o. • t NA NA NA + * 15-Min Count Period Oakes Blvd (Northbound) Oakes Blvd (Southbound) Immokalee Rd (Eastbound) Immokalee Rd (Westbound) Total Hourly Totals Beginning At Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U 4:00 PM 4:15 PM 0 0 26 0 0 20 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 7 533 15 2 506 26 0 12 14 432 16 0 228 15 0 1039 817 4:30 PM 4:45 PM 0 0 32 0 0 22 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 4 0 0 11 6 564 25 0 573 23 0 16 16 184 13 0 209 18 0 847 871 3574 5:00 PM 0 0 28 0 0 0 2 0 8 606 27 0 10 310 22 0 1013 3548 5:15 PM 5.30 PM 0 0 23 0 0 38 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 9 0 0 4 4 585 20 1 563 19 0 8 7 295 13 0 260 22 0 955 922 3686 3761 5:45 PM 0 0 27 0 0 0 5 1 9 572 24 0 5 307 17 0 967 3857 Peak 15-Min Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Flowrates Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Total All Vehicles Heavy Trucks 0 0 112 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 32 0 2424 108 0 124 12 40 4 1240 88 0 44 8 4052 192 Pedestrians Bicycles 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Railroad Stopped Buses Comments: Report generated on 4/1/2019 12:28 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) 1-877-580-2212 Page 1 of 1 Type of peak hour being reported: Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour: Total Entering Volume LOCATION: Valewood Dr -- Immokalee Rd QC JOB #: 14799113 CITY/STATE: Collier, FL DATE: Thu, Mar 7 2019 414 306 a ! 299 38 77L Peak -Hour: 7:45 AM -- Peak 15-Min: 8:00 AM 8:45 AM -- 8:15 AM 1.9 8.5 a ! 2 0 2.6 L 2823 t 237 1396 j t 20 2561 + Fogg] 4.2491 5.3 t 9.3\ L 10 t 5.7 11.7.6. - r 5.7 1634 + 1 1 r 50 o. 1487 31 a 51 10 !� 85 92 a: QuaLity Counts DATA THAT DRIVES COMMUNITIES 11.4 . 0 '1.r 4 .6.11.3 � 6 920 ! 2.4 6.5 0 J� 0 n L J 0 0 0 L 0 t 0 0 o o � 1 � 0 1 r 0 � ! r o 0 0 NA 4.j t i NA o. NA � NA h j L NA 0. ■ t NA NA r 15-Min Count Period Valewood Dr (Northbound) Valewood Dr (Southbound) Immokalee Rd (Eastbound) Immokalee Rd (Westbound) Total Hourly Totals Beginning At Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U 7:00 AM 7:15 AM 7:30 AM 7:45 AM 8:00 AM 0 3 2 7 7 0 5 8 4 8 15 6 4 12 2 0 0 0 0 0 12 4 16 17 23 3 41 3 46 13 60 9 66 4 79 0 0 0 0 0 14 29 40 59 57 308 0 302 0 333 1 345 0 354 1 0 0 0 0 1 3 2 7 9 16 580 11 0 638 11 1 633 0 1 607 4 1 641 5 0 977 1050 1121 1146 1199 4294 4516 8:15 AM 8:30 AM 13 12 2 6 12 0 0 0 17 20 14 78 11 76 0 0 54 65 352 0 345 0 0 1 15 6 626 4 2 617 7 1 1189 1167 4655 4701 8:45 AM 6 11 4 0 14 13 65 0 83 368 3 0 6 522 15 3 1113 4668 Peak 15-Min Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Flowrates Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Total All Vehicles Heavy Trucks Pedestrians Bicycles Railroad Stopped Buses 16 48 8 4 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 92 4 0 16 316 0 0 0 0 0 0 228 32 0 1416 4 184 0 0 0 0 4 64 4 0 2564 20 0 144 0 0 0 0 4796 376 0 0 Comments: Report generated on 4/1/2019 12:28 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) 1-877-580-2212 Page 1 of 1 Type of peak hour being reported: Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour: Total Entering Volume LOCATION: Valewood Dr -- Immokalee Rd QC JOB #: 14799114 CITY/STATE: Collier, FL DATE: Thu, Mar 7 2019 401 317 Peak -Hour: 5:00 PM -- 6:00 PM 2 0.9 \+ * 211 1418L Peak 15-Min: 5:00 PM -- 5:15 PM I a L ✓ + J ✓ +_ , 12724- 215 > t 4 t 1057 5.2 t 0.9 j \ t o 4.5.8 2252 o. � 1016 3.7.6. - r 6 2475 + 8 1 C 37 o. 2401 3.4 r 0 i C 0 .6.3.7 �a os*� �• * 112 169 Quality Counts *� 0.9 2A DATA THAT DRIVES COMMUNITIES J 0 0 0 L 0 0 no t t L 0, 2 + � t 0 4.0 0 F_ -1 1 � 0 1 C 0 � * r 0 1 0 NA *. t NA NA + • t NA NA NA 15-Min Count Period Valewood Dr (Northbound) Valewood Dr (Southbound) Immokalee Rd (Eastbound) Immokalee Rd (Westbound) Total Hourly Totals Beginning At Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U 4:00 PM 4:15 PM 4 11 6 5 15 2 0 0 21 36 7 51 0 12 61 0 67 49 487 2 1 480 2 2 1 4 414 9 2 186 2 1 1083 857 4:30 PM 4:45 PM 5 20 5 7 20 7 0 0 25 29 17 57 0 21 67 0 50 49 550 5 2 537 3 2 25 20 150 1 5 166 3 2 917 933 3790 5:00 PM 6 28 5 0 34 24 66 0 50 597 2 4 12 263 3 1 1095 3802 5:15 PM 5.30 PM 7 26 7 12 27 3 0 0 33 24 19 54 0 17 46 0 59 55 557 2 1 540 1 2 3 8 262 0 0 205 0 1 1030 941 3975 3999 5:45 PM 13 24 11 0 27 12 45 0 44 558 3 0 9 286 1 3 1036 4102 Peak 15-Min Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Flowrates Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Total All Vehicles Heavy Trucks 24 112 20 0 0 4 0 136 8 96 264 0 0 0 200 4 2388 8 16 124 0 48 0 1052 12 4 60 0 4380 200 Pedestrians Bicycles 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Railroad Stopped Buses Comments: Report generated on 4/1/2019 12:28 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) 1-877-580-2212 Page 1 of 1 Type of peak hour being reported: Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour: Total Entering Volume LOCATION: Logan Blvd -- Immokalee Rd QC JOB #: 14799115 CITY/STATE: Naples, FL DATE: Thu, Mar 7 2019 545 298 Peak -Hour: 7:30 AM -- 8:30 AM 2.9 13.1 a * L Peak 15-Min: 7:45 AM -- 8:00 AM1S7 I + 2907 t 141 > t 104 t 2771 5.5 4.12,8 ; t 14.4 t 5.7 1174 + FW7 4.2412 12 + r 5.5 1439 + 124 1 C 255 o. 1453 C1 11.9.6. 9.7 i C 4.3 r 10.7 * �219 71 144 � a s.s 6.9 • *� 531 434 Quality Counts 4.9 8.5 DATA THAT DRIVES COMMUNITIES J� I I � 0 1 0 L 1 t A, o t L o-, *'o 0 + 0 -1 F_ 0 i C 0 NA NA L i j t + NA NA7 � 1 1 J NA ; . � � NA w w + C I I � � r NA NA + 15-Min Count Period Logan Blvd (Northbound) Logan Blvd (Southbound) Immokalee Rd (Eastbound) Immokalee Rd (Westbound) Total Hourly Totals Beginning At Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U 7:00 AM 42 12 61 0 25 22 39 0 13 282 23 0 45 546 17 1 1128 7:15 AM 50 12 16 0 7 33 50 0 30 250 19 1 63 597 9 0 1137 7:30 AM 48 9 35 0 31 52 77 1 24 257 25 5 62 622 17 2 1267 7:45 AM 47 18 41 0 36 35 52 0 26 318 30 3 66 637 22 0 1331 4863 8:00 AM 58 16 39 0 30 36 62 0 34 281 39 7 63 582 32 2 1281 5016 8:15 AM 66 28 29 0 33 34 66 0 38 318 30 4 59 571 33 1 1310 5189 8:30 AM 54 14 31 0 27 33 58 0 38 299 53 22 60 489 21 0 1199 5121 8:45 AM 49 21 33 0 28 32 61 0 44 306 45 8 35 412 18 0 1092 4882 Peak 15-Min Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Flowrates Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Total All Vehicles 188 72 164 0 144 140 208 0 104 1272 120 12 264 2548 88 0 5324 Heavy Trucks 16 0 16 12 0 8 28 164 12 16 140 16 428 Pedestrians 0 0 0 0 0 Bicycles 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Railroad Stopped Buses Comments: Report generated on 4/1/2019 12:28 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) 1-877-580-2212 Page 1 of 1 Type of peak hour being reported: Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour: Total Entering Volume LOCATION: Logan Blvd -- Immokalee Rd QC JOB #: 14799116 CITY/STATE: Naples, FL DATE: Thu, Mar 7 2019 380 370 Peak -Hour: 5:00 PM -- 6:00 PM 3A 1.6 + * 87 202 91L Peak 15-Min: 5:15 PM -- 5:30 PM + 3.4 2 6.6 I L .1+ %. .0+ �. 1104 t 147 ! t 50 1298 5.6 4. 0.7 ! t 6 5.2 1982 o. Fo-%] 4.891 4.2 r r S.9 2374o. 245 1 C357o. 2513 4.2b.5.71 C3.1r 3.9 �a 17s4*� �a 11 1.9 810 745 Quality Counts 3.6 2.1 DATA THAT DRIVES COMMUNITIES J 0 0 1 L 0 J� 0 n L 0 J 0 . 1- 0 4-0 -1 F_ 0 1 C 0 * r NA ♦ ! ♦ ! L NA o < > ` NA NA ; • ` NA } NA NA + * 15-Min Count Period Logan Blvd (Northbound) Logan Blvd (Southbound) Immokalee Rd (Eastbound) Immokalee Rd (Westbound) Total Hourly Totals Beginning At Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U 4:00 PM 38 31 74 1 23 14 52 0 45 472 42 2 42 326 28 3 1193 4:15 PM 40 36 76 0 24 29 46 0 39 424 62 5 43 330 35 1 1190 4:30 PM 33 37 94 3 19 41 23 0 43 457 90 4 65 236 27 2 1174 4:45 PM 22 41 74 8 20 24 12 0 32 460 103 0 77 191 9 4 1077 4634 5:00 PM 38 32 100 6 24 38 14 0 30 501 67 0 88 228 10 4 1180 4621 5:15 PM 35 45 95 4 34 69 28 0 38 502 73 2 86 228 16 2 1257 4688 5:30 PM 22 52 133 10 13 52 20 0 33 434 57 0 86 204 16 7 1139 4653 5:45 PM 29 46 94 4 20 43 25 0 44 545 48 0 79 231 8 5 1221 1 4797 Peak 15-Min Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Flowrates Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Total All Vehicles 140 180 380 16 136 276 112 0 152 2008 292 8 344 912 64 8 5028 Heavy Trucks 4 0 4 12 4 4 4 84 16 20 64 0 216 Pedestrians 0 0 0 0 0 Bicycles 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Railroad Stopped Buses Comments: Report generated on 4/1/2019 12:28 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) 1-877-580-2212 Page 1 of 1 Type of peak hour being reported: Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour: Total Entering Volume LOCATION: Palazzo Dr -- Immokalee Rd QC JOB #: 14799123 CITY/STATE: Naples, FL DATE: Thu, Mar 7 2019 17 169 Peak -Hour: 7:30 AM -- 8:30 AM 23.5 7_7 a * Peak 15-Min: 8:00 AM -- 8:15 AM 4 2✓5 0 L ✓ i 4 �. 2612 t 15 J L 156 t 2749 6.1 4- 0 a L 8.3 t 6.1 1446 o. [U]7 t 2593 12.9 + r 6 1461 o. 0 1 r 0 o. 1446 a: 12.7 + 0 1 r 0 b. 12.9 t e [- 0 0 0 0 0 0 F 0 0 Quality Counts 0 0 DATA THAT DRIVES COMMUNITIES J 0 0 0 L ou � L 0L0 o+ � o i� o F_ o 1 r 0 o 0 0 _21 NA 4.j L i L NA + NA NA + • t NA r NA NA i 15-Min Count Period Palazzo Dr (Northbound) Palazzo Dr (Southbound) Immokalee Rd (Eastbound) Immokalee Rd (Westbound) Total Hourly Totals Beginning At Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U 7:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 4 312 0 0 0 584 20 0 924 7:15 AM 7:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7 0 5 0 0 2 3 304 0 347 0 0 0 0 0 651 28 0 669 33 0 992 1057 7:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 363 0 0 0 617 35 0 1017 3990 8:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 4 371 0 1 0 667 42 0 1090 4156 8:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 6 365 0 1 0 640 46 0 1063 4227 8:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 9 372 0 0 0 600 50 0 1040 4210 8:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 10 380 0 1 0 518 20 0 938 4131 Peak 15-Min Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Flowrates Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Total All Vehicles Heavy Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 0 0 0 16 0 1484 0 216 0 4 0 0 2668 168 0 144 12 4360 372 Pedestrians Bicycles 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Railroad Stopped Buses Comments: Report generated on 4/1/2019 12:28 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) 1-877-580-2212 Page 1 of 1 Type of peak hour being reported: Intersection Peak Method for determining peak hour: Total Entering Volume LOCATION: Palazzo Dr -- Immokalee Rd QC JOB #: 14799124 CITY/STATE: Naples, FL DATE: Thu, Mar 7 2019 14 82 Peak -Hour: 5:00 PM -- 6:00 PM 21.4 3.7 + * 1 0 0 14 0 o Peak 15-Min: 5:00 PM -- 5:15 PM + z1.4 0 0 ✓ + �. 1024 t 8> t 75 1084 6.3 0 j t 4 6 2376 o. Fo-%] t 1009 4 r r 6.1 2384 o. 0 1 C 0 o. 2376 a: 4 + 0 i C 0 r 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o Quality Counts o 0 DATA THAT DRIVES COMMUNITIES J 0 0 0 J J + � 0 0 L o� 0+ t0 4.0 0 1,C 0 0 0 0 + > t ♦ ! 4 NA o. 4. NA + i C NA o. • t NA NA NA + 15-Min Count Period Palazzo Dr (Northbound) Palazzo Dr (Southbound) Immokalee Rd (Eastbound) Immokalee Rd (Westbound) Total Hourly Totals Beginning At Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U 4:00 PM 4:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14 0 6 0 0 0 5 508 0 2 479 0 0 0 0 419 20 0 270 19 0 963 779 4:30 PM 4:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5 0 2 0 0 2 4 624 0 0 558 0 0 0 0 174 16 0 167 19 0 821 750 3313 5:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 611 0 0 0 266 24 0 904 3254 5:15 PM 5.30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 0 2 0 0 2 1 579 0 0 586 0 0 0 0 260 18 0 213 19 0 865 821 3340 3340 5:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 4 600 0 1 0 270 14 0 892 3482 Peak 15-Min Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Flowrates Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Left Thru Right U Total All Vehicles Heavy Trucks 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 0 4 0 0 0 2444 0 0 120 0 0 0 1064 96 0 68 8 3616 200 Pedestrians Bicycles 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Railroad Stopped Buses Comments: Report generated on 4/1/2019 12:28 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) 1-877-580-2212 Page 1 of 1 Type of report: Tube Count - Volume Data LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn 1-75 and Tarpon Bay Blvd QC JOB #: 14799119 SPECIFIC LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn 1-75 and Tarpon Bay Blvd DIRECTION: EB CITY/STATE: Naples, FL DATE: Mar 7 2019 - Mar 7 2019 Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Average Weekday Sat Sun Average Week Start Time Average Week Profile 7 Mar 19 Hourly Traffic Hourly Traffic 12:00 AM 230 230 230 [ 01:00 AM 144 144 144 ❑ 02:00 AM 103 103 103 03:00 AM 63 63 63 04:00 AM 178 178 178 ❑ 05:00 AM 319 319 319 0 06:00 AM 1184 1184 1184 07:00 AM 1710 1710 1710 08:00 AM 2007 2007 2007 09:00 AM 2028 2028 2028 10:00 AM 1999 1999 1999 11:00 AM 2199 2199 2199 12:00 PM 2189 2189 2189 01:00 PM 2344 2344 2344 02:00 PM 2387 2387 2387 03:00 PM 2750 2750 2750 04:00 PM 2526 2526 2526 05:00 PM 2713 2713 2713 06:00 PM 2513 2513 2513 07:00 PM 1878 1878 1878 08:00 PM 1613 1613 1613 C 09:00 PM 1369 1369 1369 10:00 PM 894 894 894 11:00 PM 493 493 493 =J Day Total 35833 35833 35833 % Weekday 100% Average % Week 100% 100% Average AM Peak 11:00 AM 11:00 AM 11:00 AM Volume 2199 2199 2199 PM Peak 3:00 PM 3:00 PM 3:00 PM Volume 2750 2750 2750 Comments: Report generated on 4/1/2019 12:29 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) Type of report: Tube Count - Volume Data LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn 1-75 and Tarpon Bay Blvd QC JOB #: 14799119 SPECIFIC LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn 1-75 and Tarpon Bay Blvd DIRECTION: EB, WB CITY/STATE: Naples, FL DATE: Mar 7 2019 - Mar 7 2019 Start Time Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri 7 Mar 19 Average Weekday Hourly Traffic Sat Sun Average Week Hourly Traffic Average Week Profile 12:00 AM 330 330 330 [ 01:00 AM 223 223 223 ❑ 02:00 AM 223 223 223 ❑ 03:00 AM 268 268 268 [ 04:00 AM 601 601 601 0 05:00 AM 1422 1422 1422 0 06:00 AM 3370 3370 3370 07:00 AM 4464 4464 4464 08:00 AM 4447 4447 4447 09:00 AM 4229 4229 4229 10:00 AM 4216 4216 4216 11:00 AM 4478 4478 4478 12:00 PM 4407 4407 4407 01:00 PM 4507 4507 4507 02:00 PM 4699 4699 4699 03:00 PM 4689 4689 4689 04:00 PM 3872 3872 3872 05:00 PM 4157 4157 4157 06:00 PM 4266 4266 4266 07:00 PM 2925 2925 2925 08:00 PM 2445 2445 2445 0 09:00 PM 2009 2009 2009 0 10:00 PM 1277 1277 1277 0 11:00 PM 655 655 655 0 Day Total 68179 68179 68179 % Weekday Average 100% % Week Average 100% 100% AM Peak 11:00 AM 11:00 AM 11:00 AM Volume 4478 4478 4478 PM Peak 2:00 PM 2:00 PM 2:00 PM Volume 4699 4699 4699 Comments: Report generated on 4/1/2019 12:29 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) Type of report: Tube Count - Volume Data LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn 1-75 and Tarpon Bay Blvd QC JOB #: 14799119 SPECIFIC LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn 1-75 and Tarpon Bay Blvd DIRECTION: WB CITY/STATE: Naples, FL DATE: Mar 7 2019 - Mar 7 2019 Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Average Weekday Sat Sun Average Week Start Time Average Week Profile 7 Mar 19 Hourly Traffic Hourly Traffic 12:00 AM 100 100 100 0 01:00 AM 79 79 79 0 02:00 AM 120 120 120 0 03:00 AM 205 205 205 [� 04:00 AM 423 423 423 05:00 AM 1103 1103 1103 0 06:00 AM 2186 2186 2186 07:00 AM 2754 2754 2754 08:00 AM 2440 2440 2440 09:00 AM 2201 2201 2201 10:00 AM 2217 2217 2217 11:00 AM 2279 2279 2279 12:00 PM 2218 2218 2218 01:00 PM 2163 2163 2163 02:00 PM 2312 2312 2312 03:00 PM 1939 1939 1939 04:00 PM 1346 1346 1346 0 05:00 PM 1444 1444 1444 0 06:00 PM 1753 1753 1753 07:00 PM 1047 1047 1047 0 08:00 PM 832 832 832 0 09:00 PM 640 640 640 10:00 PM 383 383 383 0 11:00 PM 162 162 162 ❑ Day Total 32346 32346 32346 % Weekday 100% Average % Week 100% 100% Average AM Peak 7:00 AM 7:00 AM 7:00 AM Volume 2754 2754 2754 PM Peak 2:00 PM 2:00 PM 2:00 PM Volume 2312 2312 2312 Comments: Report generated on 4/1/2019 12:29 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) Type of report: Tube Count - Volume Data LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Tarpon Bay Blvd and Oakes Blvd QC JOB #: 14799120 SPECIFIC LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Tarpon Bay Blvd and Oakes Blvd DIRECTION: EB CITY/STATE: Naples, FL DATE: Mar 7 2019 - Mar 7 2019 Start Time Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri 7 Mar 19 Average Weekday Hourly Traffic Sat Sun Average Week Hourly Traffic Average Week Profile 12:00 AM 171 171 171 [ 01:00 AM 118 118 118 ❑ 02:00 AM 82 82 82 03:00 AM 64 64 64 04:00 AM 193 193 193 ❑ 05:00 AM 377 377 377 ❑ 06:00 AM 1323 1323 1323 0 07:00 AM 1580 1580 1580 08:00 AM 1735 1735 1735 09:00 AM 1746 1746 1746 10:00 AM 1756 1756 1756 11:00 AM 1913 1913 1913 12:00 PM 2041 2041 2041 01:00 PM 2066 2066 2066 02:00 PM 2107 2107 2107 03:00 PM 2425 2425 2425 04:00 PM 2343 2343 2343 05:00 PM 2410 2410 2410 06:00 PM 2083 2083 2083 07:00 PM 1762 1762 1762 08:00 PM 1390 1390 1390 09:00 PM 1204 1204 1204 0 10:00 PM 748 748 748 0 11:00 PM 379 379 379 ❑ Day Total 32016 32016 32016 % Weekday Average 100% % Week Average 100% 100% AM Peak 11:00 AM 11:00 AM 11:00 AM Volume 1913 1913 1913 PM Peak 3:00 PM 3:00 PM 3:00 PM Volume 2425 2425 2425 Comments: Report generated on 4/1/2019 12:29 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) Type of report: Tube Count - Volume Data LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Tarpon Bay Blvd and Oakes Blvd QC JOB #: 14799120 SPECIFIC LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Tarpon Bay Blvd and Oakes Blvd DIRECTION: EB, WB CITY/STATE: Naples, FL DATE: Mar 7 2019 - Mar 7 2019 Start Time Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri 7 Mar 19 Average Weekday Hourly Traffic Sat Sun Average Week Hourly Traffic Average Week Profile 12:00 AM 269 269 269 [ 01:00 AM 186 186 186 0 02:00 AM 184 184 184 0 03:00 AM 234 234 234 ❑ 04:00 AM 547 547 547 05:00 AM 1368 1368 1368 0 06:00 AM 3622 3622 3622 07:00 AM 4376 4376 4376 08:00 AM 4182 4182 4182 09:00 AM 3813 3813 3813 10:00 AM 3837 3837 3837 11:00 AM 3996 3996 3996 12:00 PM 4021 4021 4021 01:00 PM 3996 3996 3996 02:00 PM 4108 4108 4108 03:00 PM 4469 4469 4469 04:00 PM 3282 3282 3282 05:00 PM 3624 3624 3624 06:00 PM 3616 3616 3616 07:00 PM 2736 2736 2736 08:00 PM 2141 2141 2141 0 09:00 PM 1778 1778 1778 0 10:00 PM 1091 1091 1091 0 11:00 PM 536 536 536 0 Day Total 62012 62012 62012 % Weekday Average 100% % Week Average 100% 100% AM Peak 7:00 AM 7:00 AM 7:00 AM Volume 4376 4376 4376 PM Peak 3:00 PM 3:00 PM 3:00 PM Volume 4469 4469 4469 Comments: Report generated on 4/1/2019 12:29 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) Type of report: Tube Count - Volume Data LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Tarpon Bay Blvd and Oakes Blvd QC JOB #: 14799120 SPECIFIC LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Tarpon Bay Blvd and Oakes Blvd DIRECTION: WB CITY/STATE: Naples, FL DATE: Mar 7 2019 - Mar 7 2019 Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Average Weekday Sat Sun Average Week Start Time Average Week Profile 7 Mar 19 Hourly Traffic Hourly Traffic 12:00 AM 98 98 98 0 01:00 AM 68 68 68 02:00 AM 102 102 102 03:00 AM 170 170 170 [I 04:00 AM 354 354 354 0 05:00 AM 991 991 991 0 06:00 AM 2299 2299 2299 07:00 AM 2796 2796 2796 08:00 AM 2447 2447 2447 09:00 AM 2067 2067 2067 10:00 AM 2081 2081 2081 11:00 AM 2083 2083 2083 12:00 PM 1980 1980 1980 01:00 PM 1930 1930 1930 02:00 PM 2001 2001 2001 03:00 PM 2044 2044 2044 04:00 PM 939 939 939 0 05:00 PM 1214 1214 1214 0 06:00 PM 1533 1533 1533 0 07:00 PM 974 974 974 0 08:00 PM 751 751 751 0 09:00 PM 574 574 574 0 10:00 PM 343 343 343 E-7 11:00 PM 157 157 157 ❑ Day Total 29996 29996 29996 % Weekday 100% Average % Week 100% 100% Average AM Peak 7:00 AM 7:00 AM 7:00 AM Volume 2796 2796 2796 PM Peak 3:00 PM 3:00 PM 3:00 PM Volume 2044 2044 2044 Comments: Report generated on 4/1/2019 12:29 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) Type of report: Tube Count - Volume Data LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Oakes Blvd and Valewood Dr QC JOB #: 14799121 SPECIFIC LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Oakes Blvd and Valewood Dr DIRECTION: EB CITY/STATE: Naples, FL DATE: Mar 7 2019 - Mar 7 2019 Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Average Weekday Sat Sun Average Week Start Time Average Week Profile 7 Mar 19 Hourly Traffic Hourly Traffic 12:00 AM 177 177 177 [ 01:00 AM 114 114 114 ❑ 02:00 AM 88 88 88 03:00 AM 62 62 62 04:00 AM 193 193 193 ❑ 05:00 AM 335 335 335 ❑ 06:00 AM 1258 1258 1258 07:00 AM 1485 1485 1485 08:00 AM 1685 1685 1685 09:00 AM 1691 1691 1691 10:00 AM 1680 1680 1680 11:00 AM 1940 1940 1940 12:00 PM 1970 1970 1970 01:00 PM 2054 2054 2054 02:00 PM 2048 2048 2048 03:00 PM 2361 2361 2361 04:00 PM 2314 2314 2314 05:00 PM 2340 2340 2340 06:00 PM 2013 2013 2013 07:00 PM 1763 1763 1763 08:00 PM 1398 1398 1398 C 09:00 PM 1218 1218 1218 10:00 PM 750 750 750 ❑ 11:00 PM 400 400 400 �J Day Total 31337 31337 31337 % Weekday 100% Average % Week 100% 100% Average AM Peak 11:00 AM 11:00 AM 11:00 AM Volume 1940 1940 1940 PM Peak 3:00 PM 3:00 PM 3:00 PM Volume 2361 2361 2361 Comments: Report generated on 4/1/2019 12:29 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) Type of report: Tube Count - Volume Data LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Oakes Blvd and Valewood Dr QC JOB #: 14799121 SPECIFIC LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Oakes Blvd and Valewood Dr DIRECTION: EB, WB CITY/STATE: Naples, FL DATE: Mar 7 2019 - Mar 7 2019 Start Time Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri 7 Mar 19 Average Weekday Hourly Traffic Sat Sun Average Week Hourly Traffic Average Week Profile 12:00 AM 276 276 276 [ 01:00 AM 184 184 184 0 02:00 AM 192 192 192 0 03:00 AM 228 228 228 ❑ 04:00 AM 542 542 542 05:00 AM 1252 1252 1252 0 06:00 AM 3306 3306 3306 07:00 AM 4286 4286 4286 08:00 AM 4214 4214 4214 09:00 AM 3881 3881 3881 10:00 AM 3846 3846 3846 11:00 AM 4091 4091 4091 12:00 PM 4036 4036 4036 01:00 PM 4036 4036 4036 02:00 PM 4260 4260 4260 03:00 PM 4489 4489 4489 04:00 PM 3413 3413 3413 05:00 PM 3641 3641 3641 06:00 PM 3614 3614 3614 07:00 PM 2776 2776 2776 08:00 PM 2179 2179 2179 0 09:00 PM 1819 1819 1819 0 10:00 PM 1102 1102 1102 0 11:00 PM 562 562 562 0 Day Total 62225 62225 62225 % Weekday Average 100% % Week Average 100% 100% AM Peak 7:00 AM 7:00 AM 7:00 AM Volume 4286 4286 4286 PM Peak 3:00 PM 3:00 PM 3:00 PM Volume 4489 4489 4489 Comments: Report generated on 4/1/2019 12:29 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) Type of report: Tube Count - Volume Data LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Oakes Blvd and Valewood Dr QC JOB #: 14799121 SPECIFIC LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Oakes Blvd and Valewood Dr DIRECTION: WB CITY/STATE: Naples, FL DATE: Mar 7 2019 - Mar 7 2019 Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Average Weekday Sat Sun Average Week Start Time Average Week Profile 7 Mar 19 Hourly Traffic Hourly Traffic 12:00 AM 99 99 99 0 01:00 AM 70 70 70 02:00 AM 104 104 104 03:00 AM 166 166 166 04:00 AM 349 349 349 05:00 AM 917 917 917 0 06:00 AM 2048 2048 2048 07:00 AM 2801 2801 2801 08:00 AM 2529 2529 2529 09:00 AM 2190 2190 2190 10:00 AM 2166 2166 2166 11:00 AM 2151 2151 2151 12:00 PM 2066 2066 2066 01:00 PM 1982 1982 1982 02:00 PM 2212 2212 2212 03:00 PM 2128 2128 2128 04:00 PM 1099 1099 1099 0 05:00 PM 1301 1301 1301 0 06:00 PM 1601 1601 1601 07:00 PM 1013 1013 1013 0 08:00 PM 781 781 781 0 09:00 PM 601 601 601 0 10:00 PM 352 352 352 0 11:00 PM 162 162 162 ❑ Day Total 30888 30888 30888 % Weekday 100% Average % Week 100% 100% Average AM Peak 7:00 AM 7:00 AM 7:00 AM Volume 2801 2801 2801 PM Peak 2:00 PM 2:00 PM 2:00 PM Volume 2212 2212 2212 Comments: Report generated on 4/1/2019 12:29 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) Type of report: Tube Count - Volume Data LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Palazzo Dr and Logan Blvd QC JOB #: 14799122 SPECIFIC LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Palazzo Dr and Logan Blvd DIRECTION: EB CITY/STATE: Naples, FL DATE: Mar 7 2019 - Mar 7 2019 Start Time Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri 7 Mar 19 Average Weekday Hourly Traffic Sat Sun Average Week Hourly Traffic Average Week Profile 12:00 AM 162 162 162 [ 01:00 AM 113 113 113 ❑ 02:00 AM 80 80 80 03:00 AM 58 58 58 04:00 AM 187 187 187 ❑ 05:00 AM 331 331 331 0 06:00 AM 1292 1292 1292 07:00 AM 1411 1411 1411 08:00 AM 1488 1488 1488 09:00 AM 1507 1507 1507 10:00 AM 1565 1565 1565 11:00 AM 1764 1764 1764 12:00 PM 1762 1762 1762 01:00 PM 1977 1977 1977 02:00 PM 1957 1957 1957 03:00 PM 2323 2323 2323 04:00 PM 2228 2228 2228 05:00 PM 2289 2289 2289 06:00 PM 1963 1963 1963 07:00 PM 1656 1656 1656 08:00 PM 1336 1336 1336 09:00 PM 1149 1149 1149 0 10:00 PM 721 721 721 0 11:00 PM 374 374 374 ❑ Day Total 29693 29693 29693 % Weekday Average 100% % Week Average 100% 100% AM Peak 11:00 AM 11:00 AM 11:00 AM Volume 1764 1764 1764 PM Peak 3:00 PM 3:00 PM 3:00 PM Volume 2323 2323 2323 Comments: Report generated on 4/1/2019 12:29 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) Type of report: Tube Count - Volume Data LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Palazzo Dr and Logan Blvd QC JOB #: 14799122 SPECIFIC LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Palazzo Dr and Logan Blvd DIRECTION: EB, WB CITY/STATE: Naples, FL DATE: Mar 7 2019 - Mar 7 2019 Start Time Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri 7 Mar 19 Average Weekday Hourly Traffic Sat Sun Average Week Hourly Traffic Average Week Profile 12:00 AM 248 248 248 [ 01:00 AM 190 190 190 ❑ 02:00 AM 173 173 173 0 03:00 AM 191 191 191 ❑ 04:00 AM 466 466 466 05:00 AM 1047 1047 1047 0 06:00 AM 3022 3022 3022 07:00 AM 4000 4000 4000 08:00 AM 4018 4018 4018 09:00 AM 3414 3414 3414 10:00 AM 3463 3463 3463 11:00 AM 3510 3510 3510 12:00 PM 3619 3619 3619 01:00 PM 3679 3679 3679 02:00 PM 3975 3975 3975 03:00 PM 4192 4192 4192 04:00 PM 3423 3423 3423 05:00 PM 3416 3416 3416 06:00 PM 3359 3359 3359 07:00 PM 2687 2687 2687 08:00 PM 2051 2051 2051 0 09:00 PM 1711 1711 1711 0 10:00 PM 1111 1111 1111 11:00 PM 578 578 578 0 Day Total 57543 57543 57543 % Weekday Average 100% % Week Average 100% 100% AM Peak 8:00 AM 8:00 AM 8:00 AM Volume 4018 4018 4018 PM Peak 3:00 PM 3:00 PM 3:00 PM Volume 4192 4192 4192 Comments: Report generated on 4/1/2019 12:29 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) Type of report: Tube Count - Volume Data LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Palazzo Dr and Logan Blvd QC JOB #: 14799122 SPECIFIC LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Palazzo Dr and Logan Blvd DIRECTION: WB CITY/STATE: Naples, FL DATE: Mar 7 2019 - Mar 7 2019 Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Average Weekday Sat Sun Average Week Start Time Average Week Profile 7 Mar 19 Hourly Traffic Hourly Traffic 12:00 AM 86 86 86 0 01:00 AM 77 77 77 0 02:00 AM 93 93 93 03:00 AM 133 133 133 ❑ 04:00 AM 279 279 279 ❑ 05:00 AM 716 716 716 0 06:00 AM 1730 1730 1730 07:00 AM 2589 2589 2589 08:00 AM 2530 2530 2530 09:00 AM 1907 1907 1907 10:00 AM 1898 1898 1898 11:00 AM 1746 1746 1746 12:00 PM 1857 1857 1857 01:00 PM 1702 1702 1702 02:00 PM 2018 2018 2018 03:00 PM 1869 1869 1869 04:00 PM 1195 1195 1195 0 05:00 PM 1127 1127 1127 0 06:00 PM 1396 1396 1396 0 07:00 PM 1031 1031 1031 0 08:00 PM 715 715 715 0 09:00 PM 562 562 562 ❑ 10:00 PM 390 390 390 ❑ 11:00 PM 204 204 204 ❑ Day Total 27850 27850 27850 % Weekday 100% Average % Week 100% 100% Average AM Peak 7:00 AM 7:00 AM 7:00 AM Volume 2589 2589 2589 PM Peak 2:00 PM 2:00 PM 2:00 PM Volume 2018 2018 2018 Comments: Report generated on 4/1/2019 12:29 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) Type of report: Tube Count - Volume Data LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Valewood Dr and Palazzo Dr QC JOB #: 14799125 SPECIFIC LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Valewood Dr and Palazzo Dr DIRECTION: EB CITY/STATE: Naples, FL DATE: Mar 7 2019 - Mar 7 2019 Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Average Weekday Sat Sun Average Week Start Time Average Week Profile 7 Mar 19 Hourly Traffic Hourly Traffic 12:00 AM 181 181 181 [ 01:00 AM 112 112 112 ❑ 02:00 AM 85 85 85 03:00 AM 54 54 54 04:00 AM 183 183 183 ❑ 05:00 AM 300 300 300 ❑ 06:00 AM 1243 1243 1243 07:00 AM 1391 1391 1391 08:00 AM 1514 1514 1514 09:00 AM 1492 1492 1492 10:00 AM 1598 1598 1598 11:00 AM 1746 1746 1746 12:00 PM 1764 1764 1764 01:00 PM 1907 1907 1907 02:00 PM 1968 1968 1968 03:00 PM 2281 2281 2281 04:00 PM 2182 2182 2182 05:00 PM 2239 2239 2239 06:00 PM 1974 1974 1974 07:00 PM 1648 1648 1648 08:00 PM 1352 1352 1352 C 09:00 PM 1183 1183 1183 10:00 PM 736 736 736 ❑ 11:00 PM 396 396 396 �J Day Total 29529 29529 29529 % Weekday 100% Average % Week 100% 100% Average AM Peak 11:00 AM 11:00 AM 11:00 AM Volume 1746 1746 1746 PM Peak 3:00 PM 3:00 PM 3:00 PM Volume 2281 2281 2281 Comments: Report generated on 4/1/2019 12:29 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) Type of report: Tube Count - Volume Data LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Valewood Dr and Palazzo Dr QC JOB #: 14799125 SPECIFIC LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Valewood Dr and Palazzo Dr DIRECTION: EB, WB CITY/STATE: Naples, FL DATE: Mar 7 2019 - Mar 7 2019 Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Average Weekday Sat Sun Average Week Start Time Average Week Profile 7 Mar 19 Hourly Traffic Hourly Traffic 12:00 AM 279 279 279 [ 01:00 AM 178 178 178 0 02:00 AM 188 188 188 ❑ 03:00 AM 212 212 212 ❑ 04:00 AM 530 530 530 0 05:00 AM 1175 1175 1175 0 06:00 AM 3245 3245 3245 07:00 AM 3990 3990 3990 08:00 AM 3781 3781 3781 09:00 AM 3456 3456 3456 10:00 AM 3503 3503 3503 11:00 AM 3627 3627 3627 12:00 PM 3549 3549 3549 01:00 PM 3666 3666 3666 02:00 PM 3931 3931 3931 03:00 PM 4160 4160 4160 04:00 PM 3091 3091 3091 05:00 PM 3306 3306 3306 06:00 PM 3352 3352 3352 07:00 PM 2610 2610 2610 08:00 PM 2035 2035 2035 09:00 PM 1746 1746 1746 10:00 PM 1085 1085 1085 11:00 PM 546 546 546 Day Total 57241 57241 57241 % Weekday 100% Average % Week 100% 100% Average AM Peak 7:00 AM 7:00 AM 7:00 AM Volume 3990 3990 3990 PM Peak 3:00 PM 3:00 PM 3:00 PM Volume 4160 4160 4160 Comments: Report generated on 4/1/2019 12:29 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) Type of report: Tube Count - Volume Data LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Valewood Dr and Palazzo Dr QC JOB #: 14799125 SPECIFIC LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Valewood Dr and Palazzo Dr DIRECTION: WB CITY/STATE: Naples, FL DATE: Mar 7 2019 - Mar 7 2019 Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Average Weekday Sat Sun Average Week Start Time Average Week Profile 7 Mar 19 Hourly Traffic Hourly Traffic 12:00 AM 98 98 98 0 01:00 AM 66 66 66 02:00 AM 103 103 103 0 03:00 AM 158 158 158 [I 04:00 AM 347 347 347 05:00 AM 875 875 875 0 06:00 AM 2002 2002 2002 07:00 AM 2599 2599 2599 08:00 AM 2267 2267 2267 09:00 AM 1964 1964 1964 10:00 AM 1905 1905 1905 11:00 AM 1881 1881 1881 12:00 PM 1785 1785 1785 01:00 PM 1759 1759 1759 02:00 PM 1963 1963 1963 03:00 PM 1879 1879 1879 04:00 PM 909 909 909 0 05:00 PM 1067 1067 1067 0 06:00 PM 1378 1378 1378 0 07:00 PM 962 962 962 0 08:00 PM 683 683 683 09:00 PM 563 563 563 0 10:00 PM 349 349 349 E-7 11:00 PM 150 150 150 ❑ Day Total 27712 27712 27712 % Weekday 100% Average % Week 100% 100% Average AM Peak 7:00 AM 7:00 AM 7:00 AM Volume 2599 2599 2599 PM Peak 2:00 PM 2:00 PM 2:00 PM Volume 1963 1963 1963 Comments: Report generated on 4/1/2019 12:29 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) Type of report: Tube Count - Volume Data LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Livingston Rd and Juliet Blvd QC JOB #: 14799117 SPECIFIC LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Livingston Rd and Juliet Blvd DIRECTION: EB CITY/STATE: Naples, FL DATE: Mar 7 2019 - Mar 7 2019 Start Time Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri 7 Mar 19 Average Weekday Hourly Traffic Sat Sun Average Week Hourly Traffic Average Week Profile 12:00 AM 147 147 147 [ 01:00 AM 111 111 111 [ 02:00 AM 76 76 76 0 03:00 AM 85 85 85 04:00 AM 159 159 159 ❑ 05:00 AM 338 338 338 0 06:00 AM 977 977 977 0 07:00 AM 1561 1561 1561 08:00 AM 1739 1739 1739 09:00 AM 1758 1758 1758 10:00 AM 1880 1880 1880 11:00 AM 2070 2070 2070 12:00 PM 2099 2099 2099 01:00 PM 2150 2150 2150 02:00 PM 2247 2247 2247 03:00 PM 2539 2539 2539 04:00 PM 2377 2377 2377 05:00 PM 2317 2317 2317 06:00 PM 1989 1989 1989 07:00 PM 1596 1596 1596 08:00 PM 1265 1265 1265 0 09:00 PM 1096 1096 1096 0 10:00 PM 646 646 646 0 11:00 PM 350 350 350 0 Day Total 31572 31572 31572 % Weekday Average 100% % Week Average 100% 100% AM Peak 11:00 AM 11:00 AM 11:00 AM Volume 2070 2070 2070 PM Peak 3:00 PM 3:00 PM 3:00 PM Volume 2539 2539 2539 Comments: Report generated on 4/1/2019 12:29 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) Type of report: Tube Count - Volume Data LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Livingston Rd and Juliet Blvd QC JOB #: 14799117 SPECIFIC LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Livingston Rd and Juliet Blvd DIRECTION: EB, WB CITY/STATE: Naples, FL DATE: Mar 7 2019 - Mar 7 2019 Start Time Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri 7 Mar 19 Average Weekday Hourly Traffic Sat Sun Average Week Hourly Traffic Average Week Profile 12:00 AM 294 294 294 [ 01:00 AM 207 207 207 ❑ 02:00 AM 148 148 148 0 03:00 AM 168 168 168 04:00 AM 358 358 358 ❑ 05:00 AM 789 789 789 ❑ 06:00 AM 2501 2501 2501 0 07:00 AM 4037 4037 4037 08:00 AM 4363 4363 4363 09:00 AM 3853 3853 3853 10:00 AM 4105 4105 4105 11:00 AM 4279 4279 4279 12:00 PM 4293 4293 4293 01:00 PM 4176 4176 4176 02:00 PM 4455 4455 4455 03:00 PM 4641 4641 4641 04:00 PM 4514 4514 4514 05:00 PM 4093 4093 4093 06:00 PM 3838 3838 3838 07:00 PM 2970 2970 2970 08:00 PM 2196 2196 2196 0 09:00 PM 1789 1789 1789 0 10:00 PM 1134 1134 1134 11:00 PM 673 673 673 ❑ Day Total 63874 63874 63874 % Weekday Average 100% % Week Average 100% 100% AM Peak 8:00 AM 8:00 AM 8:00 AM Volume 4363 4363 4363 PM Peak 3:00 PM 3:00 PM 3:00 PM Volume 4641 4641 4641 Comments: Report generated on 4/1/2019 12:29 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) Type of report: Tube Count - Volume Data LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Livingston Rd and Juliet Blvd QC JOB #: 14799117 SPECIFIC LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Livingston Rd and Juliet Blvd DIRECTION: WB CITY/STATE: Naples, FL DATE: Mar 7 2019 - Mar 7 2019 Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Average Weekday Sat Sun Average Week Start Time Average Week Profile 7 Mar 19 Hourly Traffic Hourly Traffic 12:00 AM 147 147 147 [ 01:00 AM 96 96 96 02:00 AM 72 72 72 0 03:00 AM 83 83 83 0 04:00 AM 199 199 199 ❑ 05:00 AM 451 451 451 0 06:00 AM 1524 1524 1524 07:00 AM 2476 2476 2476 08:00 AM 2624 2624 2624 09:00 AM 2095 2095 2095 10:00 AM 2225 2225 2225 11:00 AM 2209 2209 2209 12:00 PM 2194 2194 2194 01:00 PM 2026 2026 2026 02:00 PM 2208 2208 2208 03:00 PM 2102 2102 2102 04:00 PM 2137 2137 2137 05:00 PM 1776 1776 1776 06:00 PM 1849 1849 1849 07:00 PM 1374 1374 1374 08:00 PM 931 931 931 C 09:00 PM 693 693 693 10:00 PM 488 488 488 ❑ 11:00 PM 323 323 323 Day Total 32302 32302 32302 % Weekday 100% Average % Week 100% 100% Average AM Peak 8:00 AM 8:00 AM 8:00 AM Volume 2624 2624 2624 PM Peak 2:00 PM 2:00 PM 2:00 PM Volume 2208 2208 2208 Comments: Report generated on 4/1/2019 12:29 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) Type of report: Tube Count - Volume Data LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Juliet Blvd and 1-7S QCJOB#: 14799118 SPECIFIC LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Juliet Blvd and 1-7S DIRECTION: EB CITY/STATE: Naples, FL DATE: Mar 7 2019 - Mar 7 2019 Start Time Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri 7 Mar 19 Average Weekday Hourly Traffic Sat Sun Average Week Hourly Traffic Average Week Profile 12:00 AM 175 175 175 [ 01:00 AM 121 121 121 ❑ 02:00 AM 84 84 84 0 03:00 AM 77 77 77 0 04:00 AM 149 149 149 ❑ 05:00 AM 205 205 205 ❑ 06:00 AM 753 753 753 0 07:00 AM 1284 1284 1284 08:00 AM 1417 1417 1417 09:00 AM 1527 1527 1527 10:00 AM 1377 1377 1377 11:00 AM 1580 1580 1580 12:00 PM 1555 1555 1555 01:00 PM 1583 1583 1583 02:00 PM 1718 1718 1718 03:00 PM 1996 1996 1996 04:00 PM 1981 1981 1981 05:00 PM 1901 1901 1901 06:00 PM 1548 1548 1548 07:00 PM 1270 1270 1270 08:00 PM 978 978 978 0 09:00 PM 871 871 871 0 10:00 PM 696 696 696 0 11:00 PM 376 376 376 0 Day Total 25222 25222 25222 % Weekday Average 100% % Week Average 100% 100% AM Peak 11:00 AM 11:00 AM 11:00 AM Volume 1580 1580 1580 PM Peak 3:00 PM 3:00 PM 3:00 PM Volume 1996 1996 1996 Comments: Report generated on 4/1/2019 12:29 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) Type of report: Tube Count - Volume Data LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Juliet Blvd and 1-7S QC JOB #: 14799118 SPECIFIC LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Juliet Blvd and 1-7S DIRECTION: EB, WB CITY/STATE: Naples, FL DATE: Mar 7 2019 - Mar 7 2019 Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Average Weekday Sat Sun Average Week Start Time Average Week Profile 7 Mar 19 Hourly Traffic Hourly Traffic 12:00 AM 334 334 334 [ 01:00 AM 207 207 207 ❑ 02:00 AM 158 158 158 0 03:00 AM 198 198 198 ❑ 04:00 AM 424 424 424 0 05:00 AM 813 813 813 0 06:00 AM 2635 2635 2635 07:00 AM 3960 3960 3960 08:00 AM 3980 3980 3980 09:00 AM 3736 3736 3736 10:00 AM 3640 3640 3640 11:00 AM 3796 3796 3796 12:00 PM 3762 3762 3762 01:00 PM 3660 3660 3660 02:00 PM 3900 3900 3900 03:00 PM 4068 4068 4068 04:00 PM 3878 3878 3878 05:00 PM 3536 3536 3536 06:00 PM 3438 3438 3438 07:00 PM 2500 2500 2500 08:00 PM 1875 1875 1875 09:00 PM 1534 1534 1534 10:00 PM 1196 1196 1196 C 11:00 PM 666 666 666 0 Day Total 57894 57894 57894 % Weekday 100% Average % Week 100% 100% Average AM Peak 8:00 AM 8:00 AM 8:00 AM Volume 3980 3980 3980 PM Peak 3:00 PM 3:00 PM 3:00 PM Volume 4068 4068 4068 Comments: Report generated on 4/1/2019 12:29 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) Type of report: Tube Count - Volume Data LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Juliet Blvd and 1-7S QC JOB #: 14799118 SPECIFIC LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Juliet Blvd and 1-7S DIRECTION: WB CITY/STATE: Naples, FL DATE: Mar 7 2019 - Mar 7 2019 Start Time Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri 7 Mar 19 Average Weekday Hourly Traffic Sat Sun Average Week Hourly Traffic Average Week Profile 12:00 AM 159 159 159 [ 01:00 AM 86 86 86 0 02:00 AM 74 74 74 0 03:00 AM 121 121 121 [ 04:00 AM 275 275 275 E] 05:00 AM 608 608 608 0 06:00 AM 1882 1882 1882 07:00 AM 2676 2676 2676 08:00 AM 2563 2563 2563 09:00 AM 2209 2209 2209 10:00 AM 2263 2263 2263 11:00 AM 2216 2216 2216 12:00 PM 2207 2207 2207 01:00 PM 2077 2077 2077 02:00 PM 2182 2182 2182 03:00 PM 2072 2072 2072 04:00 PM 1897 1897 1897 05:00 PM 1635 1635 1635 06:00 PM 1890 1890 1890 07:00 PM 1230 1230 1230 0 08:00 PM 897 897 897 0 09:00 PM 663 663 663 0 10:00 PM 500 500 500 11:00 PM 290 290 290 0 Day Total 32672 32672 32672 % Weekday Average 100% % Week Average 100% 100% AM Peak 7:00 AM 7:00 AM 7:00 AM Volume 2676 2676 2676 PM Peak 12:00 PM 12:00 PM 12:00 PM Volume 2207 2207 2207 Comments: Report generated on 4/1/2019 12:29 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) Type of report: Tube Count - Volume Data LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Livingston Rd and Juliet Blvd QC JOB #: 14799117 SPECIFIC LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Livingston Rd and Juliet Blvd DIRECTION: EB CITY/STATE: Naples, FL DATE: Mar 7 2019 - Mar 7 2019 Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Average Weekday Sat Sun Average Week Start Time Average Week Profile 7 Mar 19 15-min Traffic 15-min Traffic 12:00 AM 42 42 42 [ 12:15 AM 32 32 32 ❑ 12:30 AM 43 43 43 ❑ 12:45 AM 30 30 30 ❑ 01:00 AM 37 37 37 ❑ 01:15 AM 30 30 30 ❑ 01:30 AM 22 22 22 0 01:45 AM 22 22 22 0 02:00 AM 26 26 26 ❑ 02:15 AM 15 15 15 02:30 AM 16 16 16 02:45 AM 19 19 19 0 03:00 AM 11 11 11 03:15 AM 20 20 20 0 03:30 AM 23 23 23 ❑ 03:45 AM 31 31 31 ❑ 04:00 AM 33 33 33 ❑ 04:15 AM 39 39 39 ❑ 04:30 AM 47 47 47 ❑ 04:45 AM 40 40 40 ❑ 05:00 AM 68 68 68 0 05:15 AM 76 76 76 0 05:30 AM 75 75 75 0 05:45 AM 119 119 119 0 Day Total Weekday Average Week Average AM Peak 15-min Vol PM Peak 15-min Vol Comments: Report generated on 4/1/2019 12:30 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) Type of report: Tube Count - Volume Data LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Livingston Rd and Juliet Blvd QC JOB #: 14799117 SPECIFIC LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Livingston Rd and Juliet Blvd DIRECTION: EB CITY/STATE: Naples, FL DATE: Mar 7 2019 - Mar 7 2019 Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Average Weekday Sat Sun Average Week Start Time Average Week Profile 7 Mar 19 15-min Traffic 15-min Traffic 06:00 AM 142 142 142 06:15 AM 249 249 249 0 06:30 AM 314 314 314 0 06:45 AM 272 272 272 0 07:00 AM 358 358 358 0 07:15 AM 366 366 366 0 07:30 AM 400 400 400 07:45 AM 437 437 437 08:00 AM 400 400 400 08:15 AM 440 440 440 08:30 AM 469 469 469 08:45 AM 430 430 430 09:00 AM 452 452 452 09:15 AM 442 442 442 09:30 AM 446 446 446 09:45 AM 418 418 418 10:00 AM 400 400 400 10:15 AM 463 463 463 10:30 AM 490 490 490 10:45 AM 527 527 527 11:00 AM 484 484 484 11:15 AM 542 542 542 11:30 AM 536 536 536 11:45 AM 508 508 508 Day Total Weekday Average Week Average AM Peak 15-min Vol PM Peak 15-min Vol Comments: Report generated on 4/1/2019 12:30 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) Type of report: Tube Count - Volume Data LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Livingston Rd and Juliet Blvd QC JOB #: 14799117 SPECIFIC LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Livingston Rd and Juliet Blvd DIRECTION: EB CITY/STATE: Naples, FL DATE: Mar 7 2019 - Mar 7 2019 Start Time Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri 7 Mar 19 Average Weekday 15-min Traffic Sat Sun Average Week 15-min Traffic Average Week Profile 12:00 PM 581 581 581 C 12:15 PM 520 520 520 C 12:30 PM 488 488 488 C 12:45 PM 510 510 510 C 01:00 PM 557 557 557 01:15 PM 508 508 508 01:30 PM 526 526 526 01:45 PM 559 559 559 02:00 PM 515 515 515 02:15 PM 547 547 547 02:30 PM 586 586 586 02:45 PM 599 599 599 03:00 PM 601 601 601 03:15 PM 640 640 640 03:30 PM 673 673 673 03:45 PM 625 625 625 04:00 PM 632 632 632 04:15 PM 636 636 636 04:30 PM 563 563 563 04:45 PM 546 546 546 05:00 PM 528 528 528 05:15 PM 531 531 531 05:30 PM 589 589 589 05:45 PM 669 669 669 Day Total Weekday Average Week Average AM Peak 15-min Vol PM Peak 15-min Vol Comments: Report generated on 4/1/2019 12:30 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) Type of report: Tube Count - Volume Data LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Livingston Rd and Juliet Blvd QC JOB #: 14799117 SPECIFIC LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Livingston Rd and Juliet Blvd DIRECTION: EB CITY/STATE: Naples, FL DATE: Mar 7 2019 - Mar 7 2019 Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Average Weekday Sat Sun Average Week Start Time Average Week Profile 7 Mar 19 15-min Traffic 15-min Traffic 06:00 PM 617 617 617 C 06:15 PM 541 541 541 C 06:30 PM 391 391 391 C 06:45 PM 440 440 440 C 07:00 PM 441 441 441 07:15 PM 358 358 358 0 07:30 PM 418 418 418 07:45 PM 379 379 379 08:00 PM 317 317 317 0 08:15 PM 342 342 342 0 08:30 PM 316 316 316 0 08:45 PM 290 290 290 0 09:00 PM 270 270 270 0 09:15 PM 294 294 294 0 09:30 PM 271 271 271 0 09:45 PM 261 261 261 0 10:00 PM 217 217 217 0 10:15 PM 183 183 183 0 10:30 PM 135 135 135 0 10:45 PM 111 111 111 0 11:00 PM 113 113 113 0 11:15 PM 84 84 84 0 11:30 PM 84 84 84 0 11:45 PM 69 69 69 0 Day Total 31572 31572 31572 % Weekday 100% Average % Week 100% 100% Average AM Peak 11:15 AM 11:15 AM 11:15 AM 15-min Vol 542 542 542 PM Peak 3:30 PM 3:30 PM 3:30 PM 15-min Vol 673 673 673 Comments: Report generated on 4/1/2019 12:30 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) Type of report: Tube Count - Volume Data LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Livingston Rd and Juliet Blvd QC JOB #: 14799117 SPECIFIC LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Livingston Rd and Juliet Blvd DIRECTION: EB, WB CITY/STATE: Naples, FL DATE: Mar 7 2019 - Mar 7 2019 Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Average Weekday Sat Sun Average Week Start Time Average Week Profile 7 Mar 19 15-min Traffic 15-min Traffic 12:00 AM 89 89 89 [ 12:15 AM 72 72 72 ❑ 12:30 AM 76 76 76 ❑ 12:45 AM 57 57 57 ❑ 01:00 AM 72 72 72 ❑ 01:15 AM 54 54 54 ❑ 01:30 AM 44 44 44 ❑ 01:45 AM 37 37 37 0 02:00 AM 41 41 41 ❑ 02:15 AM 37 37 37 0 02:30 AM 37 37 37 0 02:45 AM 33 33 33 03:00 AM 20 20 20 0 03:15 AM 41 41 41 ❑ 03:30 AM 51 51 51 ❑ 03:45 AM 56 56 56 ❑ 04:00 AM 55 55 55 ❑ 04:15 AM 75 75 75 ❑ 04:30 AM 103 103 103 ❑ 04:45 AM 125 125 125 ❑ 05:00 AM 140 140 140 ❑ 05:15 AM 163 163 163 F-1 05:30 AM 207 207 207 05:45 AM 279 279 279 Day Total Weekday Average Week Average AM Peak 15-min Vol PM Peak 15-min Vol Comments: Report generated on 4/1/2019 12:30 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) Type of report: Tube Count - Volume Data LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Livingston Rd and Juliet Blvd QC JOB #: 14799117 SPECIFIC LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Livingston Rd and Juliet Blvd DIRECTION: EB, WB CITY/STATE: Naples, FL DATE: Mar 7 2019 - Mar 7 2019 Start Time Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri 7 Mar 19 Average Weekday 15-min Traffic Sat Sun Average Week 15-min Traffic Average Week Profile 06:00 AM 06:15 AM 06:30 AM 06:45 AM 07:00 AM 07:15 AM 07:30 AM 07:45 AM 08:00 AM 08:15 AM 08:30 AM 08:45 AM 09:00 AM 09:15 AM 09:30 AM 09:45 AM 10:00 AM 10:15 AM 10:30 AM 10:45 AM 11:00 AM 11:15 AM 11:30 AM 11:45 AM 339 607 744 811 862 937 1083 1155 1039 1067 1152 1105 973 977 989 914 967 1005 1023 1110 1058 1033 1076 1112 339 607 744 811 862 937 1083 1155 1039 1067 1152 1105 973 977 989 914 967 1005 1023 1110 1058 1033 1076 1112 339 607 744 811 862 937 1083 1155 1039 1067 1152 1105 973 977 989 914 967 1005 1023 1110 1058 1033 1076 1112 C C C C Day Total Weekday Average Week Average AM Peak 15-min Vol PM Peak 15-min Vol Comments: Report generated on 4/1/2019 12:30 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) Type of report: Tube Count - Volume Data LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Livingston Rd and Juliet Blvd QC JOB #: 14799117 SPECIFIC LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Livingston Rd and Juliet Blvd DIRECTION: EB, WB CITY/STATE: Naples, FL DATE: Mar 7 2019 - Mar 7 2019 Start Time Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri 7 Mar 19 Average Weekday 15-min Traffic Sat Sun Average Week 15-min Traffic Average Week Profile 12:00 PM 12:15 PM 12:30 PM 12:45 PM 01:00 PM 01:15 PM 01:30 PM 01:45 PM 02:00 PM 02:15 PM 02:30 PM 02:45 PM 03:00 PM 03:15 PM 03:30 PM 03:45 PM 04:00 PM 04:15 PM 04:30 PM 04:45 PM 05:00 PM 05:15 PM 05:30 PM 05:45 PM 1124 1070 1036 1063 1057 1000 1033 1086 1014 1141 1118 1182 1138 1157 1199 1147 1146 1218 1110 1040 1030 990 1006 1067 1124 1070 1036 1063 1057 1000 1033 1086 1014 1141 1118 1182 1138 1157 1199 1147 1146 1218 1110 1040 1030 990 1006 1067 1124 1070 1036 1063 1057 1000 1033 1086 1014 1141 1118 1182 1138 1157 1199 1147 1146 1218 1110 1040 1030 990 1006 1067 C C C C Day Total Weekday Average Week Average AM Peak 15-min Vol PM Peak 15-min Vol Comments: Report generated on 4/1/2019 12:30 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) Type of report: Tube Count - Volume Data LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Livingston Rd and Juliet Blvd QC JOB #: 14799117 SPECIFIC LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Livingston Rd and Juliet Blvd DIRECTION: EB, WB CITY/STATE: Naples, FL DATE: Mar 7 2019 - Mar 7 2019 Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Average Weekday Sat Sun Average Week Start Time Average Week Profile 7 Mar 19 15-min Traffic 15-min Traffic 06:00 PM 1033 1033 1033 C 06:15 PM 1019 1019 1019 C 06:30 PM 860 860 860 C 06:45 PM 926 926 926 C 07:00 PM 886 886 886 07:15 PM 681 681 681 07:30 PM 718 718 718 07:45 PM 685 685 685 08:00 PM 582 582 582 0 08:15 PM 554 554 554 0 08:30 PM 555 555 555 0 08:45 PM 505 505 505 0 09:00 PM 459 459 459 0 09:15 PM 481 481 481 0 09:30 PM 453 453 453 0 09:45 PM 396 396 396 0 10:00 PM 349 349 349 0 10:15 PM 317 317 317 0 10:30 PM 244 244 244 0 10:45 PM 224 224 224 0 11:00 PM 218 218 218 0 11:15 PM 179 179 179 0 11:30 PM 150 150 150 0 11:45 PM 126 126 126 0 Day Total 63874 63874 63874 % Weekday 100% Average % Week 100% 100% Average AM Peak 7:45 AM 7:45 AM 7:45 AM 15-min Vol 1155 1155 1155 PM Peak 4:15 PM 4:15 PM 4:15 PM 15-min Vol 1218 1218 1218 Comments: Report generated on 4/1/2019 12:30 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) Type of report: Tube Count - Volume Data LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Livingston Rd and Juliet Blvd QC JOB #: 14799117 SPECIFIC LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Livingston Rd and Juliet Blvd DIRECTION: WB CITY/STATE: Naples, FL DATE: Mar 7 2019 - Mar 7 2019 Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Average Weekday Sat Sun Average Week Start Time Average Week Profile 7 Mar 19 15-min Traffic 15-min Traffic 12:00 AM 47 47 47 [ 12:15 AM 40 40 40 ❑ 12:30 AM 33 33 33 ❑ 12:45 AM 27 27 27 01:00 AM 35 35 35 ❑ 01:15 AM 24 24 24 0 01:30 AM 22 22 22 Q 01:45 AM 15 15 15 0 02:00 AM 15 15 15 0 02:15 AM 22 22 22 0 02:30 AM 21 21 21 0 02:45 AM 14 14 14 0 03:00 AM 9 9 9 03:15 AM 21 21 21 0 03:30 AM 28 28 28 0 03:45 AM 25 25 25 04:00 AM 22 22 22 0 04:15 AM 36 36 36 ❑ 04:30 AM 56 56 56 ❑ 04:45 AM 85 85 85 ❑ 05:00 AM 72 72 72 ❑ 05:15 AM 87 87 87 [� 05:30 AM 132 132 132 05:45 AM 160 160 160 Day Total Weekday Average Week Average AM Peak 15-min Vol PM Peak 15-min Vol Comments: Report generated on 4/1/2019 12:30 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) Type of report: Tube Count - Volume Data LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Livingston Rd and Juliet Blvd QC JOB #: 14799117 SPECIFIC LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Livingston Rd and Juliet Blvd DIRECTION: WB CITY/STATE: Naples, FL DATE: Mar 7 2019 - Mar 7 2019 Start Time Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri 7 Mar 19 Average Weekday 15-min Traffic Sat Sun Average Week 15-min Traffic Average Week Profile 06:00 AM 197 197 197 C 06:15 AM 358 358 358 C 06:30 AM 430 430 430 C 06:45 AM 539 539 539 C 07:00 AM 504 504 504 07:15 AM 571 571 571 07:30 AM 683 683 683 07:45 AM 718 718 718 08:00 AM 639 639 639 08:15 AM 627 627 627 08:30 AM 683 683 683 08:45 AM 675 675 675 09:00 AM 521 521 521 09:15 AM 535 535 535 09:30 AM 543 543 543 09:45 AM 496 496 496 10:00 AM 567 567 567 10:15 AM 542 542 542 10:30 AM 533 533 533 10:45 AM 583 583 583 11:00 AM 574 574 574 11:15 AM 491 491 491 11:30 AM 540 540 540 11:45 AM 604 604 604 Day Total Weekday Average Week Average AM Peak 15-min Vol PM Peak 15-min Vol Comments: Report generated on 4/1/2019 12:30 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) Type of report: Tube Count - Volume Data LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Livingston Rd and Juliet Blvd QC JOB #: 14799117 SPECIFIC LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Livingston Rd and Juliet Blvd DIRECTION: WB CITY/STATE: Naples, FL DATE: Mar 7 2019 - Mar 7 2019 Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Average Weekday Sat Sun Average Week Start Time Average Week Profile 7 Mar 19 15-min Traffic 15-min Traffic 12:00 PM 543 543 543 C 12:15 PM 550 550 550 C 12:30 PM 548 548 548 C 12:45 PM 553 553 553 C 01:00 PM 500 500 500 01:15 PM 492 492 492 01:30 PM 507 507 507 01:45 PM 527 527 527 02:00 PM 499 499 499 02:15 PM 594 594 594 02:30 PM 532 532 532 02:45 PM 583 583 583 03:00 PM 537 537 537 03:15 PM 517 517 517 03:30 PM 526 526 526 03:45 PM 522 522 522 04:00 PM 514 514 514 04:15 PM 582 582 582 04:30 PM 547 547 547 04:45 PM 494 494 494 05:00 PM 502 502 502 05:15 PM 459 459 459 05:30 PM 417 417 417 05:45 PM 398 398 398 Day Total Weekday Average Week Average AM Peak 15-min Vol PM Peak 15-min Vol Comments: Report generated on 4/1/2019 12:30 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) Type of report: Tube Count - Volume Data LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Livingston Rd and Juliet Blvd QC JOB #: 14799117 SPECIFIC LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Livingston Rd and Juliet Blvd DIRECTION: WB CITY/STATE: Naples, FL DATE: Mar 7 2019 - Mar 7 2019 Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Average Weekday Sat Sun Average Week Start Time Average Week Profile 7 Mar 19 15-min Traffic 15-min Traffic 06:00 PM 416 416 416 ❑ 06:15 PM 478 478 478 C 06:30 PM 469 469 469 C 06:45 PM 486 486 486 C 07:00 PM 445 445 445 07:15 PM 323 323 323 0 07:30 PM 300 300 300 0 07:45 PM 306 306 306 0 08:00 PM 265 265 265 0 08:15 PM 212 212 212 0 08:30 PM 239 239 239 0 08:45 PM 215 215 215 0 09:00 PM 189 189 189 09:15 PM 187 187 187 0 09:30 PM 182 182 182 09:45 PM 135 135 135 ❑ 10:00 PM 132 132 132 ❑ 10:15 PM 134 134 134 ❑ 10:30 PM 109 109 109 ❑ 10:45 PM 113 113 113 ❑ 11:00 PM 105 105 105 ❑ 11:15 PM 95 95 95 ❑ 11:30 PM 66 66 66 ❑ 11:45 PM 57 57 57 ❑ Day Total 32302 32302 32302 % Weekday 100% Average % Week 100% 100% Average AM Peak 7:45 AM 7:45 AM 7:45 AM 15-min Vol 718 718 718 PM Peak 2:15 PM 2:15 PM 2:15 PM 15-min Vol 594 594 594 Comments: Report generated on 4/1/2019 12:30 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) Type of report: Tube Count - Volume Data LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Juliet Blvd and 1-7S QCJOB#: 14799118 SPECIFIC LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Juliet Blvd and 1-7S DIRECTION: EB CITY/STATE: Naples, FL DATE: Mar 7 2019 - Mar 7 2019 Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Average Weekday Sat Sun Average Week Start Time Average Week Profile 7 Mar 19 15-min Traffic 15-min Traffic 12:00 AM 66 66 66 [ 12:15 AM 45 45 45 ❑ 12:30 AM 35 35 35 ❑ 12:45 AM 29 29 29 ❑ 01:00 AM 36 36 36 ❑ 01:15 AM 37 37 37 ❑ 01:30 AM 27 27 27 ❑ 01:45 AM 21 21 21 ❑ 02:00 AM 28 28 28 ❑ 02:15 AM 22 22 22 ❑ 02:30 AM 17 17 17 0 02:45 AM 17 17 17 0 03:00 AM 20 20 20 03:15 AM 14 14 14 03:30 AM 19 19 19 0 03:45 AM 24 24 24 ❑ 04:00 AM 24 24 24 ❑ 04:15 AM 41 41 41 ❑ 04:30 AM 41 41 41 ❑ 04:45 AM 43 43 43 ❑ 05:00 AM 43 43 43 ❑ 05:15 AM 62 62 62 ❑ 05:30 AM 62 62 62 ❑ 05:45 AM 38 38 38 ❑ Day Total Weekday Average Week Average AM Peak 15-min Vol PM Peak 15-min Vol Comments: Report generated on 4/1/2019 12:30 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) Type of report: Tube Count - Volume Data LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Juliet Blvd and 1-7S QC JOB #: 14799118 SPECIFIC LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Juliet Blvd and 1-7S DIRECTION: EB CITY/STATE: Naples, FL DATE: Mar 7 2019 - Mar 7 2019 Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Average Weekday Sat Sun Average Week Start Time Average Week Profile 7 Mar 19 15-min Traffic 15-min Traffic 06:00 AM 112 112 112 C 06:15 AM 141 141 141 C 06:30 AM 247 247 247 0 06:45 AM 253 253 253 0 07:00 AM 287 287 287 0 07:15 AM 283 283 283 0 07:30 AM 323 323 323 07:45 AM 391 391 391 08:00 AM 357 357 357 08:15 AM 335 335 335 08:30 AM 365 365 365 08:45 AM 360 360 360 09:00 AM 373 373 373 09:15 AM 383 383 383 09:30 AM 423 423 423 09:45 AM 348 348 348 10:00 AM 347 347 347 10:15 AM 333 333 333 10:30 AM 354 354 354 10:45 AM 343 343 343 11:00 AM 411 411 411 11:15 AM 393 393 393 11:30 AM 366 366 366 11:45 AM 410 410 410 Day Total Weekday Average Week Average AM Peak 15-min Vol PM Peak 15-min Vol Comments: Report generated on 4/1/2019 12:30 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) Type of report: Tube Count - Volume Data LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Juliet Blvd and 1-7S QC JOB #: 14799118 SPECIFIC LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Juliet Blvd and 1-7S DIRECTION: EB CITY/STATE: Naples, FL DATE: Mar 7 2019 - Mar 7 2019 Start Time Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri 7 Mar 19 Average Weekday 15-min Traffic Sat Sun Average Week 15-min Traffic Average Week Profile 12:00 PM 12:15 PM 12:30 PM 12:45 PM 01:00 PM 01:15 PM 01:30 PM 01:45 PM 02:00 PM 02:15 PM 02:30 PM 02:45 PM 03:00 PM 03:15 PM 03:30 PM 03:45 PM 04:00 PM 04:15 PM 04:30 PM 04:45 PM 05:00 PM 05:15 PM 05:30 PM 05:45 PM 364 421 360 410 377 412 443 351 464 408 398 448 401 516 540 539 515 495 469 502 510 478 518 395 364 421 360 410 377 412 443 351 464 408 398 448 401 516 540 539 515 495 469 502 510 478 518 395 364 421 360 410 377 412 443 351 464 408 398 448 401 516 540 539 515 495 469 502 510 478 518 395 C C C C Day Total Weekday Average Week Average AM Peak 15-min Vol PM Peak 15-min Vol Comments: Report generated on 4/1/2019 12:30 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) Type of report: Tube Count - Volume Data LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Juliet Blvd and 1-7S QC JOB #: 14799118 SPECIFIC LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Juliet Blvd and 1-7S DIRECTION: EB CITY/STATE: Naples, FL DATE: Mar 7 2019 - Mar 7 2019 Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Average Weekday Sat Sun Average Week Start Time Average Week Profile 7 Mar 19 15-min Traffic 15-min Traffic 06:00 PM 443 443 443 C 06:15 PM 433 433 433 C 06:30 PM 330 330 330 C 06:45 PM 342 342 342 C 07:00 PM 315 315 315 07:15 PM 324 324 324 07:30 PM 342 342 342 07:45 PM 289 289 289 0 08:00 PM 249 249 249 0 08:15 PM 271 271 271 0 08:30 PM 204 204 204 0 08:45 PM 254 254 254 0 09:00 PM 237 237 237 0 09:15 PM 187 187 187 0 09:30 PM 248 248 248 0 09:45 PM 199 199 199 0 10:00 PM 241 241 241 0 10:15 PM 142 142 142 10:30 PM 170 170 170 0 10:45 PM 143 143 143 11:00 PM 88 88 88 0 11:15 PM 123 123 123 0 11:30 PM 88 88 88 0 11:45 PM 77 77 77 Day Total 25222 25222 25222 % Weekday 100% Average % Week 100% 100% Average AM Peak 9:30 AM 9:30 AM 9:30 AM 15-min Vol 423 423 423 PM Peak 3:30 PM 3:30 PM 3:30 PM 15-min Vol 540 540 540 Comments: Report generated on 4/1/2019 12:30 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) Type of report: Tube Count - Volume Data LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Juliet Blvd and 1-7S QC JOB #: 14799118 SPECIFIC LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Juliet Blvd and 1-7S DIRECTION: EB, WB CITY/STATE: Naples, FL DATE: Mar 7 2019 - Mar 7 2019 Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Average Weekday Sat Sun Average Week Start Time Average Week Profile 7 Mar 19 15-min Traffic 15-min Traffic 12:00 AM 113 113 113 [ 12:15 AM 83 83 83 ❑ 12:30 AM 73 73 73 ❑ 12:45 AM 65 65 65 [I 01:00 AM 61 61 61 ❑ 01:15 AM 62 62 62 ❑ 01:30 AM 42 42 42 ❑ 01:45 AM 42 42 42 ❑ 02:00 AM 51 51 51 ❑ 02:15 AM 44 44 44 ❑ 02:30 AM 33 33 33 0 02:45 AM 30 30 30 0 03:00 AM 45 45 45 ❑ 03:15 AM 43 43 43 ❑ 03:30 AM 60 60 60 ❑ 03:45 AM 50 50 50 ❑ 04:00 AM 67 67 67 ❑ 04:15 AM 101 101 101 ❑ 04:30 AM 125 125 125 ❑ 04:45 AM 131 131 131 ❑ 05:00 AM 134 134 134 ❑ 05:15 AM 210 210 210 C� 05:30 AM 242 242 242 ❑ 05:45 AM 227 227 227 ❑� Day Total Weekday Average Week Average AM Peak 15-min Vol PM Peak 15-min Vol Comments: Report generated on 4/1/2019 12:30 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) Type of report: Tube Count - Volume Data LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Juliet Blvd and 1-7S QCJOB#: 14799118 SPECIFIC LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Juliet Blvd and 1-7S DIRECTION: EB, WB CITY/STATE: Naples, FL DATE: Mar 7 2019 - Mar 7 2019 Start Time Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri 7 Mar 19 Average Weekday 15-min Traffic Sat Sun Average Week 15-min Traffic Average Week Profile 06:00 AM 06:15 AM 06:30 AM 06:45 AM 07:00 AM 07:15 AM 07:30 AM 07:45 AM 08:00 AM 08:15 AM 08:30 AM 08:45 AM 09:00 AM 09:15 AM 09:30 AM 09:45 AM 10:00 AM 10:15 AM 10:30 AM 10:45 AM 11:00 AM 11:15 AM 11:30 AM 11:45 AM 452 613 793 777 908 954 1040 1058 1034 1026 1032 888 923 909 991 913 900 913 926 901 925 914 968 989 452 613 793 777 908 954 1040 1058 1034 1026 1032 888 923 909 991 913 900 913 926 901 925 914 968 989 452 613 793 777 908 954 1040 1058 1034 1026 1032 888 923 909 991 913 900 913 926 901 925 914 968 989 C C C C Day Total Weekday Average Week Average AM Peak 15-min Vol PM Peak 15-min Vol Comments: Report generated on 4/1/2019 12:30 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) Type of report: Tube Count - Volume Data LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Juliet Blvd and 1-7S QCJOB#: 14799118 SPECIFIC LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Juliet Blvd and 1-7S DIRECTION: EB, WB CITY/STATE: Naples, FL DATE: Mar 7 2019 - Mar 7 2019 Start Time Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri 7 Mar 19 Average Weekday 15-min Traffic Sat Sun Average Week 15-min Traffic Average Week Profile 12:00 PM 12:15 PM 12:30 PM 12:45 PM 01:00 PM 01:15 PM 01:30 PM 01:45 PM 02:00 PM 02:15 PM 02:30 PM 02:45 PM 03:00 PM 03:15 PM 03:30 PM 03:45 PM 04:00 PM 04:15 PM 04:30 PM 04:45 PM 05:00 PM 05:15 PM 05:30 PM 05:45 PM 929 1015 921 897 904 886 986 884 1017 973 934 976 933 1059 1069 1007 1000 979 922 977 959 863 919 795 929 1015 921 897 904 886 986 884 1017 973 934 976 933 1059 1069 1007 1000 979 922 977 959 863 919 795 929 1015 921 897 904 886 986 884 1017 973 934 976 933 1059 1069 1007 1000 979 922 977 959 863 919 795 C C C C Day Total Weekday Average Week Average AM Peak 15-min Vol PM Peak 15-min Vol Comments: Report generated on 4/1/2019 12:30 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) Type of report: Tube Count - Volume Data LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Juliet Blvd and 1-7S QCJOB#: 14799118 SPECIFIC LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Juliet Blvd and 1-7S DIRECTION: EB, WB CITY/STATE: Naples, FL DATE: Mar 7 2019 - Mar 7 2019 Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Average Weekday Sat Sun Average Week Start Time Average Week Profile 7 Mar 19 15-min Traffic 15-min Traffic 06:00 PM 937 937 937 C 06:15 PM 915 915 915 C 06:30 PM 807 807 807 C 06:45 PM 779 779 779 07:00 PM 660 660 660 07:15 PM 641 641 641 07:30 PM 644 644 644 07:45 PM 555 555 555 0 08:00 PM 489 489 489 0 08:15 PM 509 509 509 0 08:30 PM 423 423 423 0 08:45 PM 454 454 454 0 09:00 PM 426 426 426 0 09:15 PM 381 381 381 0 09:30 PM 392 392 392 0 09:45 PM 335 335 335 0 10:00 PM 403 403 403 0 10:15 PM 259 259 259 10:30 PM 273 273 273 0 10:45 PM 261 261 261 11:00 PM 188 188 188 11:15 PM 196 196 196 0 11:30 PM 148 148 148 0 11:45 PM 134 134 134 0 Day Total 57894 57894 57894 % Weekday 100% Average % Week 100% 100% Average AM Peak 7:45 AM 7:45 AM 7:45 AM 15-min Vol 1058 1058 1058 PM Peak 3:30 PM 3:30 PM 3:30 PM 15-min Vol 1069 1069 1069 Comments: Report generated on 4/1/2019 12:30 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) Type of report: Tube Count - Volume Data LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Juliet Blvd and 1-7S QCJOB#: 14799118 SPECIFIC LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Juliet Blvd and 1-7S DIRECTION: WB CITY/STATE: Naples, FL DATE: Mar 7 2019 - Mar 7 2019 Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Average Weekday Sat Sun Average Week Start Time Average Week Profile 7 Mar 19 15-min Traffic 15-min Traffic 12:00 AM 47 47 47 [ 12:15 AM 38 38 38 ❑ 12:30 AM 38 38 38 ❑ 12:45 AM 36 36 36 ❑ 01:00 AM 25 25 25 01:15 AM 25 25 25 0 01:30 AM 15 15 15 0 01:45 AM 21 21 21 0 02:00 AM 23 23 23 0 02:15 AM 22 22 22 0 02:30 AM 16 16 16 02:45 AM 13 13 13 0 03:00 AM 25 25 25 03:15 AM 29 29 29 0 03:30 AM 41 41 41 ❑ 03:45 AM 26 26 26 04:00 AM 43 43 43 ❑ 04:15 AM 60 60 60 ❑ 04:30 AM 84 84 84 ❑ 04:45 AM 88 88 88 ❑ 05:00 AM 91 91 91 ❑ 05:15 AM 148 148 148 C� 05:30 AM 180 180 180 ❑ 05:45 AM 189 189 189 ❑� Day Total Weekday Average Week Average AM Peak 15-min Vol PM Peak 15-min Vol Comments: Report generated on 4/1/2019 12:30 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) Type of report: Tube Count - Volume Data LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Juliet Blvd and 1-7S QCJOB#: 14799118 SPECIFIC LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Juliet Blvd and 1-7S DIRECTION: WB CITY/STATE: Naples, FL DATE: Mar 7 2019 - Mar 7 2019 Start Time Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri 7 Mar 19 Average Weekday 15-min Traffic Sat Sun Average Week 15-min Traffic Average Week Profile 06:00 AM 340 340 340 C 06:15 AM 472 472 472 C 06:30 AM 546 546 546 C 06:45 AM 524 524 524 C 07:00 AM 621 621 621 07:15 AM 671 671 671 07:30 AM 717 717 717 07:45 AM 667 667 667 08:00 AM 677 677 677 08:15 AM 691 691 691 08:30 AM 667 667 667 08:45 AM 528 528 528 09:00 AM 550 550 550 09:15 AM 526 526 526 09:30 AM 568 568 568 09:45 AM 565 565 565 10:00 AM 553 553 553 10:15 AM 580 580 580 10:30 AM 572 572 572 10:45 AM 558 558 558 11:00 AM 514 514 514 11:15 AM 521 521 521 11:30 AM 602 602 602 11:45 AM 579 579 579 Day Total Weekday Average Week Average AM Peak 15-min Vol PM Peak 15-min Vol Comments: Report generated on 4/1/2019 12:30 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) Type of report: Tube Count - Volume Data LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Juliet Blvd and 1-7S QCJOB#: 14799118 SPECIFIC LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Juliet Blvd and 1-7S DIRECTION: WB CITY/STATE: Naples, FL DATE: Mar 7 2019 - Mar 7 2019 Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Average Weekday Sat Sun Average Week Start Time Average Week Profile 7 Mar 19 15-min Traffic 15-min Traffic 12:00 PM 565 565 565 C 12:15 PM 594 594 594 C 12:30 PM 561 561 561 C 12:45 PM 487 487 487 C 01:00 PM 527 527 527 01:15 PM 474 474 474 01:30 PM 543 543 543 01:45 PM 533 533 533 02:00 PM 553 553 553 02:15 PM 565 565 565 02:30 PM 536 536 536 02:45 PM 528 528 528 03:00 PM 532 532 532 03:15 PM 543 543 543 03:30 PM 529 529 529 03:45 PM 468 468 468 04:00 PM 485 485 485 04:15 PM 484 484 484 04:30 PM 453 453 453 04:45 PM 475 475 475 05:00 PM 449 449 449 05:15 PM 385 385 385 0 05:30 PM 401 401 401 05:45 PM 400 400 400 Day Total Weekday Average Week Average AM Peak 15-min Vol PM Peak 15-min Vol Comments: Report generated on 4/1/2019 12:30 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) Type of report: Tube Count - Volume Data LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Juliet Blvd and 1-7S QCJOB#: 14799118 SPECIFIC LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Juliet Blvd and 1-7S DIRECTION: WB CITY/STATE: Naples, FL DATE: Mar 7 2019 - Mar 7 2019 Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Average Weekday Sat Sun Average Week Start Time Average Week Profile 7 Mar 19 15-min Traffic 15-min Traffic 06:00 PM 494 494 494 C 06:15 PM 482 482 482 C 06:30 PM 477 477 477 C 06:45 PM 437 437 437 07:00 PM 345 345 345 0 07:15 PM 317 317 317 0 07:30 PM 302 302 302 0 07:45 PM 266 266 266 0 08:00 PM 240 240 240 0 08:15 PM 238 238 238 0 08:30 PM 219 219 219 0 08:45 PM 200 200 200 0 09:00 PM 189 189 189 0 09:15 PM 194 194 194 0 09:30 PM 144 144 144 ❑ 09:45 PM 136 136 136 ❑ 10:00 PM 162 162 162 0 10:15 PM 117 117 117 ❑ 10:30 PM 103 103 103 ❑ 10:45 PM 118 118 118 ❑ 11:00 PM 100 100 100 ❑ 11:15 PM 73 73 73 ❑ 11:30 PM 60 60 60 ❑ 11:45 PM 57 57 57 ❑ Day Total 32672 32672 32672 % Weekday 100% Average % Week 100% 100% Average AM Peak 7:30 AM 7:30 AM 7:30 AM 15-min Vol 717 717 717 PM Peak 12:15 PM 12:15 PM 12:15 PM 15-min Vol 594 594 594 Comments: Report generated on 4/1/2019 12:30 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) Type of report: Tube Count - Volume Data LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn 1-75 and Tarpon Bay Blvd QC JOB #: 14799119 SPECIFIC LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn 1-75 and Tarpon Bay Blvd DIRECTION: EB CITY/STATE: Naples, FL DATE: Mar 7 2019 - Mar 7 2019 Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Average Weekday Sat Sun Average Week Start Time Average Week Profile 7 Mar 19 15-min Traffic 15-min Traffic 12:00 AM 78 78 78 [ 12:15 AM 60 60 60 ❑ 12:30 AM 51 51 51 ❑ 12:45 AM 41 41 41 01:00 AM 42 42 42 ❑ 01:15 AM 41 41 41 El 01:30 AM 30 30 30 0 01:45 AM 31 31 31 0 02:00 AM 28 28 28 0 02:15 AM 28 28 28 02:30 AM 27 27 27 02:45 AM 20 20 20 03:00 AM 15 15 15 0 03:15 AM 17 17 17 03:30 AM 9 9 9 0 03:45 AM 22 22 22 0 04:00 AM 22 22 22 0 04:15 AM 56 56 56 ❑ 04:30 AM 52 52 52 ❑ 04:45 AM 48 48 48 ❑ 05:00 AM 46 46 46 ❑ 05:15 AM 85 85 85 0 05:30 AM 82 82 82 ❑ 05:45 AM 106 106 106 0 Day Total Weekday Average Week Average AM Peak 15-min Vol PM Peak 15-min Vol Comments: Report generated on 4/1/2019 12:30 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) Type of report: Tube Count - Volume Data LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn 1-75 and Tarpon Bay Blvd QC JOB #: 14799119 SPECIFIC LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn 1-75 and Tarpon Bay Blvd DIRECTION: EB CITY/STATE: Naples, FL DATE: Mar 7 2019 - Mar 7 2019 Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Average Weekday Sat Sun Average Week Start Time Average Week Profile 7 Mar 19 15-min Traffic 15-min Traffic 06:00 AM 148 148 148 C 06:15 AM 233 233 233 C 06:30 AM 392 392 392 0 06:45 AM 411 411 411 0 07:00 AM 370 370 370 0 07:15 AM 394 394 394 0 07:30 AM 433 433 433 07:45 AM 513 513 513 08:00 AM 475 475 475 08:15 AM 495 495 495 08:30 AM 501 501 501 08:45 AM 536 536 536 09:00 AM 488 488 488 09:15 AM 510 510 510 09:30 AM 497 497 497 09:45 AM 533 533 533 10:00 AM 516 516 516 10:15 AM 422 422 422 10:30 AM 552 552 552 10:45 AM 509 509 509 11:00 AM 541 541 541 11:15 AM 508 508 508 11:30 AM 556 556 556 11:45 AM 594 594 594 Day Total Weekday Average Week Average AM Peak 15-min Vol PM Peak 15-min Vol Comments: Report generated on 4/1/2019 12:30 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) Type of report: Tube Count - Volume Data LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn 1-75 and Tarpon Bay Blvd QC JOB #: 14799119 SPECIFIC LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn 1-75 and Tarpon Bay Blvd DIRECTION: EB CITY/STATE: Naples, FL DATE: Mar 7 2019 - Mar 7 2019 Start Time Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri 7 Mar 19 Average Weekday 15-min Traffic Sat Sun Average Week 15-min Traffic Average Week Profile 12:00 PM 520 520 520 C 12:15 PM 540 540 540 C 12:30 PM 570 570 570 C 12:45 PM 559 559 559 C 01:00 PM 566 566 566 01:15 PM 583 583 583 01:30 PM 544 544 544 01:45 PM 651 651 651 02:00 PM 600 600 600 02:15 PM 552 552 552 02:30 PM 611 611 611 02:45 PM 624 624 624 03:00 PM 636 636 636 03:15 PM 682 682 682 03:30 PM 680 680 680 03:45 PM 752 752 752 04:00 PM 590 590 590 04:15 PM 597 597 597 04:30 PM 681 681 681 04:45 PM 658 658 658 05:00 PM 703 703 703 05:15 PM 674 674 674 05:30 PM 673 673 673 05:45 PM 663 663 663 Day Total Weekday Average Week Average AM Peak 15-min Vol PM Peak 15-min Vol Comments: Report generated on 4/1/2019 12:30 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) Type of report: Tube Count - Volume Data LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn 1-75 and Tarpon Bay Blvd QC JOB #: 14799119 SPECIFIC LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn 1-75 and Tarpon Bay Blvd DIRECTION: EB CITY/STATE: Naples, FL DATE: Mar 7 2019 - Mar 7 2019 Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Average Weekday Sat Sun Average Week Start Time Average Week Profile 7 Mar 19 15-min Traffic 15-min Traffic 06:00 PM 682 682 682 C 06:15 PM 754 754 754 C 06:30 PM 561 561 561 C 06:45 PM 516 516 516 07:00 PM 461 461 461 07:15 PM 487 487 487 07:30 PM 462 462 462 07:45 PM 468 468 468 08:00 PM 454 454 454 08:15 PM 385 385 385 0 08:30 PM 396 396 396 0 08:45 PM 378 378 378 0 09:00 PM 333 333 333 0 09:15 PM 347 347 347 0 09:30 PM 350 350 350 0 09:45 PM 339 339 339 0 10:00 PM 265 265 265 0 10:15 PM 252 252 252 0 10:30 PM 220 220 220 0 10:45 PM 157 157 157 11:00 PM 160 160 160 11:15 PM 145 145 145 0 11:30 PM 100 100 100 11:45 PM 88 88 88 0 Day Total 35833 35833 35833 % Weekday 100% Average % Week 100% 100% Average AM Peak 11:45 AM 11:45 AM 11:45 AM 15-min Vol 594 594 594 PM Peak 6:15 PM 6:15 PM 6:15 PM 15-min Vol 754 754 754 Comments: Report generated on 4/1/2019 12:30 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) Type of report: Tube Count - Volume Data LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn 1-75 and Tarpon Bay Blvd QC JOB #: 14799119 SPECIFIC LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn 1-75 and Tarpon Bay Blvd DIRECTION: EB, WB CITY/STATE: Naples, FL DATE: Mar 7 2019 - Mar 7 2019 Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Average Weekday Sat Sun Average Week Start Time Average Week Profile 7 Mar 19 15-min Traffic 15-min Traffic 12:00 AM 105 105 105 [ 12:15 AM 87 87 87 ❑ 12:30 AM 79 79 79 ❑ 12:45 AM 59 59 59 ❑ 01:00 AM 67 67 67 ❑ 01:15 AM 59 59 59 ❑ 01:30 AM 44 44 44 ❑ 01:45 AM 53 53 53 ❑ 02:00 AM 50 50 50 ❑ 02:15 AM 55 55 55 ❑ 02:30 AM 63 63 63 ❑ 02:45 AM 55 55 55 ❑ 03:00 AM 48 48 48 ❑ 03:15 AM 70 70 70 ❑ 03:30 AM 63 63 63 ❑ 03:45 AM 87 87 87 ❑ 04:00 AM 96 96 96 ❑ 04:15 AM 145 145 145 0 04:30 AM 166 166 166 0 04:45 AM 194 194 194 05:00 AM 263 263 263 E 05:15 AM 305 305 305 05:30 AM 327 327 327 ❑ 05:45 AM 527 527 527 Day Total Weekday Average Week Average AM Peak 15-min Vol PM Peak 15-min Vol Comments: Report generated on 4/1/2019 12:30 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) Type of report: Tube Count - Volume Data LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn 1-75 and Tarpon Bay Blvd QC JOB #: 14799119 SPECIFIC LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn 1-75 and Tarpon Bay Blvd DIRECTION: EB, WB CITY/STATE: Naples, FL DATE: Mar 7 2019 - Mar 7 2019 Start Time Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri 7 Mar 19 Average Weekday 15-min Traffic Sat Sun Average Week 15-min Traffic Average Week Profile 06:00 AM 608 608 608 C 06:15 AM 779 779 779 C 06:30 AM 918 918 918 C 06:45 AM 1065 1065 1065 C 07:00 AM 1063 1063 1063 07:15 AM 1083 1083 1083 07:30 AM 1126 1126 1126 07:45 AM 1192 1192 1192 08:00 AM 1171 1171 1171 08:15 AM 1182 1182 1182 08:30 AM 1022 1022 1022 08:45 AM 1072 1072 1072 09:00 AM 1048 1048 1048 09:15 AM 1031 1031 1031 09:30 AM 1058 1058 1058 09:45 AM 1092 1092 1092 10:00 AM 1090 1090 1090 10:15 AM 978 978 978 10:30 AM 1081 1081 1081 10:45 AM 1067 1067 1067 11:00 AM 1079 1079 1079 11:15 AM 1078 1078 1078 11:30 AM 1189 1189 1189 11:45 AM 1132 1132 1132 Day Total Weekday Average Week Average AM Peak 15-min Vol PM Peak 15-min Vol Comments: Report generated on 4/1/2019 12:30 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) Type of report: Tube Count - Volume Data LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn 1-75 and Tarpon Bay Blvd QC JOB #: 14799119 SPECIFIC LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn 1-75 and Tarpon Bay Blvd DIRECTION: EB, WB CITY/STATE: Naples, FL DATE: Mar 7 2019 - Mar 7 2019 Start Time Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri 7 Mar 19 Average Weekday 15-min Traffic Sat Sun Average Week 15-min Traffic Average Week Profile 12:00 PM 1074 1074 1074 C 12:15 PM 1136 1136 1136 C 12:30 PM 1071 1071 1071 C 12:45 PM 1126 1126 1126 C 01:00 PM 1069 1069 1069 01:15 PM 1123 1123 1123 01:30 PM 1103 1103 1103 01:45 PM 1212 1212 1212 02:00 PM 1187 1187 1187 02:15 PM 1127 1127 1127 02:30 PM 1158 1158 1158 02:45 PM 1227 1227 1227 03:00 PM 1240 1240 1240 03:15 PM 1249 1249 1249 03:30 PM 1171 1171 1171 03:45 PM 1029 1029 1029 04:00 PM 891 891 891 04:15 PM 877 877 877 04:30 PM 1066 1066 1066 04:45 PM 1038 1038 1038 05:00 PM 1037 1037 1037 05:15 PM 1036 1036 1036 05:30 PM 1060 1060 1060 05:45 PM 1024 1024 1024 Day Total Weekday Average Week Average AM Peak 15-min Vol PM Peak 15-min Vol Comments: Report generated on 4/1/2019 12:30 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) Type of report: Tube Count - Volume Data LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn 1-75 and Tarpon Bay Blvd QC JOB #: 14799119 SPECIFIC LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn 1-75 and Tarpon Bay Blvd DIRECTION: EB, WB CITY/STATE: Naples, FL DATE: Mar 7 2019 - Mar 7 2019 Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Average Weekday Sat Sun Average Week Start Time Average Week Profile 7 Mar 19 15-min Traffic 15-min Traffic 06:00 PM 1048 1048 1048 ❑ 06:15 PM 1294 1294 1294 C 06:30 PM 1051 1051 1051 C 06:45 PM 873 873 873 07:00 PM 756 756 756 07:15 PM 777 777 777 07:30 PM 709 709 709 0 07:45 PM 683 683 683 0 08:00 PM 681 681 681 0 08:15 PM 595 595 595 0 08:30 PM 608 608 608 0 08:45 PM 561 561 561 0 09:00 PM 517 517 517 0 09:15 PM 516 516 516 0 09:30 PM 486 486 486 0 09:45 PM 490 490 490 0 10:00 PM 381 381 381 0 10:15 PM 346 346 346 0 10:30 PM 317 317 317 10:45 PM 233 233 233 ❑ 11:00 PM 202 202 202 ❑ 11:15 PM 204 204 204 ❑ 11:30 PM 130 130 130 ❑ 11:45 PM 119 119 119 ❑ Day Total 68179 68179 68179 % Weekday 100% Average % Week 100% 100% Average AM Peak 7:45 AM 7:45 AM 7:45 AM 15-min Vol 1192 1192 1192 PM Peak 6:15 PM 6:15 PM 6:15 PM 15-min Vol 1294 1294 1294 Comments: Report generated on 4/1/2019 12:30 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) Type of report: Tube Count - Volume Data LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn 1-75 and Tarpon Bay Blvd QC JOB #: 14799119 SPECIFIC LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn 1-75 and Tarpon Bay Blvd DIRECTION: WB CITY/STATE: Naples, FL DATE: Mar 7 2019 - Mar 7 2019 Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Average Weekday Sat Sun Average Week Start Time Average Week Profile 7 Mar 19 15-min Traffic 15-min Traffic 12:00 AM 27 27 27 ❑ 12:15 AM 27 27 27 ❑ 12:30 AM 28 28 28 ❑ 12:45 AM 18 18 18 01:00 AM 25 25 25 ❑ 01:15 AM 18 18 18 0 01:30 AM 14 14 14 0 01:45 AM 22 22 22 0 02:00 AM 22 22 22 0 02:15 AM 27 27 27 ❑ 02:30 AM 36 36 36 ❑ 02:45 AM 35 35 35 ❑ 03:00 AM 33 33 33 ❑ 03:15 AM 53 53 53 ❑ 03:30 AM 54 54 54 ❑ 03:45 AM 65 65 65 ❑ 04:00 AM 74 74 74 ❑ 04:15 AM 89 89 89 ❑ 04:30 AM 114 114 114 04:45 AM 146 146 146 05:00 AM 217 217 217 05:15 AM 220 220 220 C 05:30 AM 245 245 245 C 05:45 AM 421 421 421 Day Total Weekday Average Week Average AM Peak 15-min Vol PM Peak 15-min Vol Comments: Report generated on 4/1/2019 12:30 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) Type of report: Tube Count - Volume Data LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn 1-75 and Tarpon Bay Blvd QC JOB #: 14799119 SPECIFIC LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn 1-75 and Tarpon Bay Blvd DIRECTION: WB CITY/STATE: Naples, FL DATE: Mar 7 2019 - Mar 7 2019 Start Time Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri 7 Mar 19 Average Weekday 15-min Traffic Sat Sun Average Week 15-min Traffic Average Week Profile 06:00 AM 460 460 460 C 06:15 AM 546 546 546 C 06:30 AM 526 526 526 C 06:45 AM 654 654 654 C 07:00 AM 693 693 693 07:15 AM 689 689 689 07:30 AM 693 693 693 07:45 AM 679 679 679 08:00 AM 696 696 696 08:15 AM 687 687 687 08:30 AM 521 521 521 08:45 AM 536 536 536 09:00 AM 560 560 560 09:15 AM 521 521 521 09:30 AM 561 561 561 09:45 AM 559 559 559 10:00 AM 574 574 574 10:15 AM 556 556 556 10:30 AM 529 529 529 10:45 AM 558 558 558 11:00 AM 538 538 538 11:15 AM 570 570 570 11:30 AM 633 633 633 11:45 AM 538 538 538 Day Total Weekday Average Week Average AM Peak 15-min Vol PM Peak 15-min Vol Comments: Report generated on 4/1/2019 12:30 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) Type of report: Tube Count - Volume Data LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn 1-75 and Tarpon Bay Blvd QC JOB #: 14799119 SPECIFIC LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn 1-75 and Tarpon Bay Blvd DIRECTION: WB CITY/STATE: Naples, FL DATE: Mar 7 2019 - Mar 7 2019 Start Time Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri 7 Mar 19 Average Weekday 15-min Traffic Sat Sun Average Week 15-min Traffic Average Week Profile 12:00 PM 554 554 554 C 12:15 PM 596 596 596 C 12:30 PM 501 501 501 C 12:45 PM 567 567 567 C 01:00 PM 503 503 503 01:15 PM 540 540 540 01:30 PM 559 559 559 01:45 PM 561 561 561 02:00 PM 587 587 587 02:15 PM 575 575 575 02:30 PM 547 547 547 02:45 PM 603 603 603 03:00 PM 604 604 604 03:15 PM 567 567 567 03:30 PM 491 491 491 03:45 PM 277 277 277 0 04:00 PM 301 301 301 0 04:15 PM 280 280 280 0 04:30 PM 385 385 385 04:45 PM 380 380 380 0 05:00 PM 334 334 334 0 05:15 PM 362 362 362 0 05:30 PM 387 387 387 05:45 PM 361 361 361 0 Day Total Weekday Average Week Average AM Peak 15-min Vol PM Peak 15-min Vol Comments: Report generated on 4/1/2019 12:30 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) Type of report: Tube Count - Volume Data LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn 1-75 and Tarpon Bay Blvd QC JOB #: 14799119 SPECIFIC LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn 1-75 and Tarpon Bay Blvd DIRECTION: WB CITY/STATE: Naples, FL DATE: Mar 7 2019 - Mar 7 2019 Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Average Weekday Sat Sun Average Week Start Time Average Week Profile 7 Mar 19 15-min Traffic 15-min Traffic 06:00 PM 366 366 366 C 06:15 PM 540 540 540 C 06:30 PM 490 490 490 06:45 PM 357 357 357 0 07:00 PM 295 295 295 0 07:15 PM 290 290 290 0 07:30 PM 247 247 247 0 07:45 PM 215 215 215 0 08:00 PM 227 227 227 0 08:15 PM 210 210 210 0 08:30 PM 212 212 212 0 08:45 PM 183 183 183 09:00 PM 184 184 184 09:15 PM 169 169 169 0 09:30 PM 136 136 136 ❑ 09:45 PM 151 151 151 ❑ 10:00 PM 116 116 116 ❑ 10:15 PM 94 94 94 ❑ 10:30 PM 97 97 97 ❑ 10:45 PM 76 76 76 ❑ 11:00 PM 42 42 42 ❑ 11:15 PM 59 59 59 ❑ 11:30 PM 30 30 30 0 11:45 PM 31 31 31 Day Total 32346 32346 32346 % Weekday 100% Average % Week 100% 100% Average AM Peak 8:00 AM 8:00 AM 8:00 AM 15-min Vol 696 696 696 PM Peak 3:00 PM 3:00 PM 3:00 PM 15-min Vol 604 604 604 Comments: Report generated on 4/1/2019 12:30 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) Type of report: Tube Count - Volume Data LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Tarpon Bay Blvd and Oakes Blvd QC JOB #: 14799120 SPECIFIC LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Tarpon Bay Blvd and Oakes Blvd DIRECTION: EB CITY/STATE: Naples, FL DATE: Mar 7 2019 - Mar 7 2019 Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Average Weekday Sat Sun Average Week Start Time Average Week Profile 7 Mar 19 15-min Traffic 15-min Traffic 12:00 AM 53 53 53 [ 12:15 AM 46 46 46 ❑ 12:30 AM 36 36 36 ❑ 12:45 AM 36 36 36 ❑ 01:00 AM 39 39 39 ❑ 01:15 AM 29 29 29 0 01:30 AM 25 25 25 01:45 AM 25 25 25 02:00 AM 27 27 27 0 02:15 AM 25 25 25 02:30 AM 16 16 16 02:45 AM 14 14 14 0 03:00 AM 17 17 17 03:15 AM 8 8 8 03:30 AM 20 20 20 0 03:45 AM 19 19 19 0 04:00 AM 53 53 53 ❑ 04:15 AM 49 49 49 ❑ 04:30 AM 45 45 45 ❑ 04:45 AM 46 46 46 ❑ 05:00 AM 78 78 78 ❑ 05:15 AM 64 64 64 0 05:30 AM 94 94 94 ❑ 05:45 AM 141 141 141 ❑ Day Total Weekday Average Week Average AM Peak 15-min Vol PM Peak 15-min Vol Comments: Report generated on 4/1/2019 12:30 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) Type of report: Tube Count - Volume Data LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Tarpon Bay Blvd and Oakes Blvd QC JOB #: 14799120 SPECIFIC LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Tarpon Bay Blvd and Oakes Blvd DIRECTION: EB CITY/STATE: Naples, FL DATE: Mar 7 2019 - Mar 7 2019 Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Average Weekday Sat Sun Average Week Start Time Average Week Profile 7 Mar 19 15-min Traffic 15-min Traffic 06:00 AM 228 228 228 C 06:15 AM 357 357 357 C 06:30 AM 403 403 403 C 06:45 AM 335 335 335 C 07:00 AM 343 343 343 07:15 AM 372 372 372 0 07:30 AM 434 434 434 07:45 AM 431 431 431 08:00 AM 439 439 439 08:15 AM 437 437 437 08:30 AM 474 474 474 08:45 AM 385 385 385 09:00 AM 438 438 438 09:15 AM 416 416 416 09:30 AM 473 473 473 09:45 AM 419 419 419 10:00 AM 385 385 385 10:15 AM 458 458 458 10:30 AM 427 427 427 10:45 AM 486 486 486 11:00 AM 450 450 450 11:15 AM 461 461 461 11:30 AM 552 552 552 11:45 AM 450 450 450 Day Total Weekday Average Week Average AM Peak 15-min Vol PM Peak 15-min Vol Comments: Report generated on 4/1/2019 12:30 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) Type of report: Tube Count - Volume Data LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Tarpon Bay Blvd and Oakes Blvd QC JOB #: 14799120 SPECIFIC LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Tarpon Bay Blvd and Oakes Blvd DIRECTION: EB CITY/STATE: Naples, FL DATE: Mar 7 2019 - Mar 7 2019 Start Time Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri 7 Mar 19 Average Weekday 15-min Traffic Sat Sun Average Week 15-min Traffic Average Week Profile 12:00 PM 12:15 PM 12:30 PM 12:45 PM 01:00 PM 01:15 PM 01:30 PM 01:45 PM 02:00 PM 02:15 PM 02:30 PM 02:45 PM 03:00 PM 03:15 PM 03:30 PM 03:45 PM 04:00 PM 04:15 PM 04:30 PM 04:45 PM 05:00 PM 05:15 PM 05:30 PM 05:45 PM 529 488 496 528 456 523 582 505 505 517 541 544 596 605 679 545 537 597 590 619 625 569 614 602 529 488 496 528 456 523 582 505 505 517 541 544 596 605 679 545 537 597 590 619 625 569 614 602 529 488 496 528 456 523 582 505 505 517 541 544 596 605 679 545 537 597 590 619 625 569 614 602 C C C C Day Total Weekday Average Week Average AM Peak 15-min Vol PM Peak 15-min Vol Comments: Report generated on 4/1/2019 12:30 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) Type of report: Tube Count - Volume Data LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Tarpon Bay Blvd and Oakes Blvd QC JOB #: 14799120 SPECIFIC LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Tarpon Bay Blvd and Oakes Blvd DIRECTION: EB CITY/STATE: Naples, FL DATE: Mar 7 2019 - Mar 7 2019 Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Average Weekday Sat Sun Average Week Start Time Average Week Profile 7 Mar 19 15-min Traffic 15-min Traffic 06:00 PM 678 678 678 C 06:15 PM 517 517 517 C 06:30 PM 481 481 481 C 06:45 PM 407 407 407 07:00 PM 447 447 447 07:15 PM 421 421 421 07:30 PM 461 461 461 07:45 PM 433 433 433 08:00 PM 357 357 357 0 08:15 PM 361 361 361 0 08:30 PM 347 347 347 0 08:45 PM 325 325 325 0 09:00 PM 307 307 307 0 09:15 PM 318 318 318 0 09:30 PM 313 313 313 0 09:45 PM 266 266 266 0 10:00 PM 227 227 227 0 10:15 PM 200 200 200 0 10:30 PM 166 166 166 0 10:45 PM 155 155 155 0 11:00 PM 126 126 126 11:15 PM 94 94 94 0 11:30 PM 76 76 76 11:45 PM 83 83 83 Day Total 32016 32016 32016 % Weekday 100% Average % Week 100% 100% Average AM Peak 11:30 AM 11:30 AM 11:30 AM 15-min Vol 552 552 552 PM Peak 3:30 PM 3:30 PM 3:30 PM 15-min Vol 679 679 679 Comments: Report generated on 4/1/2019 12:30 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) Type of report: Tube Count - Volume Data LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Tarpon Bay Blvd and Oakes Blvd QC JOB #: 14799120 SPECIFIC LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Tarpon Bay Blvd and Oakes Blvd DIRECTION: EB, WB CITY/STATE: Naples, FL DATE: Mar 7 2019 - Mar 7 2019 Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Average Weekday Sat Sun Average Week Start Time Average Week Profile 7 Mar 19 15-min Traffic 15-min Traffic 12:00 AM 77 77 77 [ 12:15 AM 70 70 70 ❑ 12:30 AM 61 61 61 ❑ 12:45 AM 61 61 61 ❑ 01:00 AM 55 55 55 ❑ 01:15 AM 54 54 54 ❑ 01:30 AM 40 40 40 01:45 AM 37 37 37 0 02:00 AM 53 53 53 ❑ 02:15 AM 43 43 43 02:30 AM 50 50 50 ❑ 02:45 AM 38 38 38 0 03:00 AM 51 51 51 ❑ 03:15 AM 46 46 46 ❑ 03:30 AM 70 70 70 ❑ 03:45 AM 67 67 67 ❑ 04:00 AM 118 118 118 0 04:15 AM 111 111 111 El 04:30 AM 155 155 155 0 04:45 AM 163 163 163 0 05:00 AM 241 241 241 0 05:15 AM 331 331 331 05:30 AM 333 333 333 05:45 AM 463 463 463 Day Total Weekday Average Week Average AM Peak 15-min Vol PM Peak 15-min Vol Comments: Report generated on 4/1/2019 12:30 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) Type of report: Tube Count - Volume Data LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Tarpon Bay Blvd and Oakes Blvd QC JOB #: 14799120 SPECIFIC LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Tarpon Bay Blvd and Oakes Blvd DIRECTION: EB, WB CITY/STATE: Naples, FL DATE: Mar 7 2019 - Mar 7 2019 Start Time Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri 7 Mar 19 Average Weekday 15-min Traffic Sat Sun Average Week 15-min Traffic Average Week Profile 06:00 AM 749 749 749 C J 06:15 AM 939 939 939 C 06:30 AM 980 980 980 C 06:45 AM 954 954 954 C 07:00 AM 1074 1074 1074 07:15 AM 1065 1065 1065 07:30 AM 1114 1114 1114 07:45 AM 1123 1123 1123 08:00 AM 1145 1145 1145 08:15 AM 1108 1108 1108 08:30 AM 1077 1077 1077 08:45 AM 852 852 852 09:00 AM 964 964 964 09:15 AM 959 959 959 09:30 AM 961 961 961 09:45 AM 929 929 929 10:00 AM 934 934 934 10:15 AM 952 952 952 10:30 AM 973 973 973 10:45 AM 978 978 978 11:00 AM 947 947 947 11:15 AM 948 948 948 11:30 AM 1064 1064 1064 11:45 AM 1037 1037 1037 Day Total Weekday Average Week Average AM Peak 15-min Vol PM Peak 15-min Vol Comments: Report generated on 4/1/2019 12:30 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) Type of report: Tube Count - Volume Data LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Tarpon Bay Blvd and Oakes Blvd QC JOB #: 14799120 SPECIFIC LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Tarpon Bay Blvd and Oakes Blvd DIRECTION: EB, WB CITY/STATE: Naples, FL DATE: Mar 7 2019 - Mar 7 2019 Start Time Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri 7 Mar 19 Average Weekday 15-min Traffic Sat Sun Average Week 15-min Traffic Average Week Profile 12:00 PM 1018 1018 1018 C 12:15 PM 1015 1015 1015 C 12:30 PM 1013 1013 1013 C 12:45 PM 975 975 975 C 01:00 PM 911 911 911 01:15 PM 961 961 961 01:30 PM 1098 1098 1098 01:45 PM 1026 1026 1026 02:00 PM 1002 1002 1002 02:15 PM 1057 1057 1057 02:30 PM 1046 1046 1046 02:45 PM 1003 1003 1003 03:00 PM 1157 1157 1157 03:15 PM 1110 1110 1110 03:30 PM 1200 1200 1200 03:45 PM 1002 1002 1002 04:00 PM 765 765 765 04:15 PM 789 789 789 04:30 PM 805 805 805 04:45 PM 923 923 923 05:00 PM 943 943 943 05:15 PM 835 835 835 05:30 PM 923 923 923 05:45 PM 923 923 923 Day Total Weekday Average Week Average AM Peak 15-min Vol PM Peak 15-min Vol Comments: Report generated on 4/1/2019 12:30 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) Type of report: Tube Count - Volume Data LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Tarpon Bay Blvd and Oakes Blvd QC JOB #: 14799120 SPECIFIC LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Tarpon Bay Blvd and Oakes Blvd DIRECTION: EB, WB CITY/STATE: Naples, FL DATE: Mar 7 2019 - Mar 7 2019 Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Average Weekday Sat Sun Average Week Start Time Average Week Profile 7 Mar 19 15-min Traffic 15-min Traffic 06:00 PM 980 980 980 C 06:15 PM 839 839 839 C 06:30 PM 979 979 979 C 06:45 PM 818 818 818 C 07:00 PM 694 694 694 07:15 PM 691 691 691 07:30 PM 719 719 719 07:45 PM 632 632 632 0 08:00 PM 556 556 556 0 08:15 PM 578 578 578 0 08:30 PM 517 517 517 0 08:45 PM 490 490 490 0 09:00 PM 486 486 486 0 09:15 PM 469 469 469 0 09:30 PM 426 426 426 0 09:45 PM 397 397 397 0 10:00 PM 330 330 330 0 10:15 PM 283 283 283 0 10:30 PM 254 254 254 0 10:45 PM 224 224 224 0 11:00 PM 187 187 187 0 11:15 PM 131 131 131 0 11:30 PM 116 116 116 0 11:45 PM 102 102 102 El Day Total 62012 62012 62012 % Weekday 100% Average % Week 100% 100% Average AM Peak 8:00 AM 8:00 AM 8:00 AM 15-min Vol 1145 1145 1145 PM Peak 3:30 PM 3:30 PM 3:30 PM 15-min Vol 1200 1200 1200 Comments: Report generated on 4/1/2019 12:30 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) Type of report: Tube Count - Volume Data LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Tarpon Bay Blvd and Oakes Blvd QC JOB #: 14799120 SPECIFIC LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Tarpon Bay Blvd and Oakes Blvd DIRECTION: WB CITY/STATE: Naples, FL DATE: Mar 7 2019 - Mar 7 2019 Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Average Weekday Sat Sun Average Week Start Time Average Week Profile 7 Mar 19 15-min Traffic 15-min Traffic 12:00 AM 24 24 24 0 12:15 AM 24 24 24 12:30 AM 25 25 25 12:45 AM 25 25 25 01:00 AM 16 16 16 01:15 AM 25 25 25 0 01:30 AM 15 15 15 0 01:45 AM 12 12 12 0 02:00 AM 26 26 26 0 02:15 AM 18 18 18 02:30 AM 34 34 34 ❑ 02:45 AM 24 24 24 03:00 AM 34 34 34 ❑ 03:15 AM 38 38 38 ❑ 03:30 AM 50 50 50 ❑ 03:45 AM 48 48 48 ❑ 04:00 AM 65 65 65 ❑ 04:15 AM 62 62 62 El 04:30 AM 110 110 110 ❑ 04:45 AM 117 117 117 05:00 AM 163 163 163 ❑ 05:15 AM 267 267 267 05:30 AM 239 239 239 05:45 AM 322 322 322 Day Total Weekday Average Week Average AM Peak 15-min Vol PM Peak 15-min Vol Comments: Report generated on 4/1/2019 12:30 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) Type of report: Tube Count - Volume Data LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Tarpon Bay Blvd and Oakes Blvd QC JOB #: 14799120 SPECIFIC LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Tarpon Bay Blvd and Oakes Blvd DIRECTION: WB CITY/STATE: Naples, FL DATE: Mar 7 2019 - Mar 7 2019 Start Time Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri 7 Mar 19 Average Weekday 15-min Traffic Sat Sun Average Week 15-min Traffic Average Week Profile 06:00 AM 521 521 521 C 06:15 AM 582 582 582 C 06:30 AM 577 577 577 C 06:45 AM 619 619 619 C 07:00 AM 731 731 731 07:15 AM 693 693 693 07:30 AM 680 680 680 07:45 AM 692 692 692 08:00 AM 706 706 706 08:15 AM 671 671 671 08:30 AM 603 603 603 08:45 AM 467 467 467 09:00 AM 526 526 526 09:15 AM 543 543 543 09:30 AM 488 488 488 09:45 AM 510 510 510 10:00 AM 549 549 549 10:15 AM 494 494 494 10:30 AM 546 546 546 10:45 AM 492 492 492 11:00 AM 497 497 497 11:15 AM 487 487 487 11:30 AM 512 512 512 11:45 AM 587 587 587 Day Total Weekday Average Week Average AM Peak 15-min Vol PM Peak 15-min Vol Comments: Report generated on 4/1/2019 12:30 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) Type of report: Tube Count - Volume Data LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Tarpon Bay Blvd and Oakes Blvd QC JOB #: 14799120 SPECIFIC LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Tarpon Bay Blvd and Oakes Blvd DIRECTION: WB CITY/STATE: Naples, FL DATE: Mar 7 2019 - Mar 7 2019 Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Average Weekday Sat Sun Average Week Start Time Average Week Profile 7 Mar 19 15-min Traffic 15-min Traffic 12:00 PM 489 489 489 C 12:15 PM 527 527 527 C 12:30 PM 517 517 517 C 12:45 PM 447 447 447 01:00 PM 455 455 455 01:15 PM 438 438 438 01:30 PM 516 516 516 01:45 PM 521 521 521 02:00 PM 497 497 497 02:15 PM 540 540 540 02:30 PM 505 505 505 02:45 PM 459 459 459 03:00 PM 561 561 561 03:15 PM 505 505 505 03:30 PM 521 521 521 03:45 PM 457 457 457 04:00 PM 228 228 228 0 04:15 PM 192 192 192 04:30 PM 215 215 215 0 04:45 PM 304 304 304 0 05:00 PM 318 318 318 0 05:15 PM 266 266 266 0 05:30 PM 309 309 309 0 05:45 PM 321 321 321 0 Day Total Weekday Average Week Average AM Peak 15-min Vol PM Peak 15-min Vol Comments: Report generated on 4/1/2019 12:30 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) Type of report: Tube Count - Volume Data LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Tarpon Bay Blvd and Oakes Blvd QC JOB #: 14799120 SPECIFIC LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Tarpon Bay Blvd and Oakes Blvd DIRECTION: WB CITY/STATE: Naples, FL DATE: Mar 7 2019 - Mar 7 2019 Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Average Weekday Sat Sun Average Week Start Time Average Week Profile 7 Mar 19 15-min Traffic 15-min Traffic 06:00 PM 302 302 302 C 06:15 PM 322 322 322 C 06:30 PM 498 498 498 06:45 PM 411 411 411 07:00 PM 247 247 247 0 07:15 PM 270 270 270 0 07:30 PM 258 258 258 0 07:45 PM 199 199 199 0 08:00 PM 199 199 199 0 08:15 PM 217 217 217 0 08:30 PM 170 170 170 0 08:45 PM 165 165 165 0 09:00 PM 179 179 179 0 09:15 PM 151 151 151 ❑ 09:30 PM 113 113 113 ❑ 09:45 PM 131 131 131 ❑ 10:00 PM 103 103 103 ❑ 10:15 PM 83 83 83 ❑ 10:30 PM 88 88 88 ❑ 10:45 PM 69 69 69 ❑ 11:00 PM 61 61 61 ❑ 11:15 PM 37 37 37 ❑ 11:30 PM 40 40 40 ❑ 11:45 PM 19 19 19 Day Total 29996 29996 29996 % Weekday 100% Average % Week 100% 100% Average AM Peak 7:00 AM 7:00 AM 7:00 AM 15-min Vol 731 731 731 PM Peak 3:00 PM 3:00 PM 3:00 PM 15-min Vol 561 561 561 Comments: Report generated on 4/1/2019 12:30 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) Type of report: Tube Count - Volume Data LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Oakes Blvd and Valewood Dr QC JOB #: 14799121 SPECIFIC LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Oakes Blvd and Valewood Dr DIRECTION: EB CITY/STATE: Naples, FL DATE: Mar 7 2019 - Mar 7 2019 Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Average Weekday Sat Sun Average Week Start Time Average Week Profile 7 Mar 19 15-min Traffic 15-min Traffic 12:00 AM 57 57 57 [ 12:15 AM 49 49 49 ❑ 12:30 AM 35 35 35 ❑ 12:45 AM 36 36 36 [ 01:00 AM 38 38 38 ❑ 01:15 AM 32 32 32 ❑ 01:30 AM 23 23 23 ❑ 01:45 AM 21 21 21 0 02:00 AM 29 29 29 ❑ 02:15 AM 27 27 27 ❑ 02:30 AM 13 13 13 0 02:45 AM 19 19 19 0 03:00 AM 15 15 15 03:15 AM 10 10 10 03:30 AM 20 20 20 0 03:45 AM 17 17 17 04:00 AM 49 49 49 ❑ 04:15 AM 53 53 53 ❑ 04:30 AM 43 43 43 ❑ 04:45 AM 48 48 48 ❑ 05:00 AM 53 53 53 ❑ 05:15 AM 80 80 80 ❑ 05:30 AM 87 87 87 ❑ 05:45 AM 115 115 115 ❑ Day Total Weekday Average Week Average AM Peak 15-min Vol PM Peak 15-min Vol Comments: Report generated on 4/1/2019 12:30 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) Type of report: Tube Count - Volume Data LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Oakes Blvd and Valewood Dr QC JOB #: 14799121 SPECIFIC LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Oakes Blvd and Valewood Dr DIRECTION: EB CITY/STATE: Naples, FL DATE: Mar 7 2019 - Mar 7 2019 Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Average Weekday Sat Sun Average Week Start Time Average Week Profile 7 Mar 19 15-min Traffic 15-min Traffic 06:00 AM 204 204 204 C 06:15 AM 288 288 288 C 06:30 AM 397 397 397 C 06:45 AM 369 369 369 C 07:00 AM 318 318 318 07:15 AM 370 370 370 07:30 AM 368 368 368 07:45 AM 429 429 429 08:00 AM 410 410 410 08:15 AM 419 419 419 08:30 AM 425 425 425 08:45 AM 431 431 431 09:00 AM 399 399 399 09:15 AM 417 417 417 09:30 AM 405 405 405 09:45 AM 470 470 470 10:00 AM 368 368 368 10:15 AM 419 419 419 10:30 AM 488 488 488 10:45 AM 405 405 405 11:00 AM 486 486 486 11:15 AM 421 421 421 11:30 AM 534 534 534 11:45 AM 499 499 499 Day Total Weekday Average Week Average AM Peak 15-min Vol PM Peak 15-min Vol Comments: Report generated on 4/1/2019 12:30 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) Type of report: Tube Count - Volume Data LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Oakes Blvd and Valewood Dr QC JOB #: 14799121 SPECIFIC LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Oakes Blvd and Valewood Dr DIRECTION: EB CITY/STATE: Naples, FL DATE: Mar 7 2019 - Mar 7 2019 Start Time Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri 7 Mar 19 Average Weekday 15-min Traffic Sat Sun Average Week 15-min Traffic Average Week Profile 12:00 PM 12:15 PM 12:30 PM 12:45 PM 01:00 PM 01:15 PM 01:30 PM 01:45 PM 02:00 PM 02:15 PM 02:30 PM 02:45 PM 03:00 PM 03:15 PM 03:30 PM 03:45 PM 04:00 PM 04:15 PM 04:30 PM 04:45 PM 05:00 PM 05:15 PM 05:30 PM 05:45 PM 492 462 521 495 520 500 482 552 472 502 576 498 590 620 605 546 573 570 582 589 596 583 591 570 492 462 521 495 520 500 482 552 472 502 576 498 590 620 605 546 573 570 582 589 596 583 591 570 492 462 521 495 520 500 482 552 472 502 576 498 590 620 605 546 573 570 582 589 596 583 591 570 C C C C Day Total Weekday Average Week Average AM Peak 15-min Vol PM Peak 15-min Vol Comments: Report generated on 4/1/2019 12:30 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) Type of report: Tube Count - Volume Data LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Oakes Blvd and Valewood Dr QC JOB #: 14799121 SPECIFIC LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Oakes Blvd and Valewood Dr DIRECTION: EB CITY/STATE: Naples, FL DATE: Mar 7 2019 - Mar 7 2019 Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Average Weekday Sat Sun Average Week Start Time Average Week Profile 7 Mar 19 15-min Traffic 15-min Traffic 06:00 PM 645 645 645 C 06:15 PM 494 494 494 C 06:30 PM 463 463 463 C 06:45 PM 411 411 411 C 07:00 PM 454 454 454 07:15 PM 448 448 448 07:30 PM 435 435 435 07:45 PM 426 426 426 08:00 PM 383 383 383 08:15 PM 321 321 321 0 08:30 PM 378 378 378 08:45 PM 316 316 316 0 09:00 PM 313 313 313 0 09:15 PM 303 303 303 0 09:30 PM 314 314 314 0 09:45 PM 288 288 288 0 10:00 PM 228 228 228 0 10:15 PM 215 215 215 0 10:30 PM 166 166 166 0 10:45 PM 141 141 141 11:00 PM 149 149 149 11:15 PM 97 97 97 0 11:30 PM 85 85 85 0 11:45 PM 69 69 69 0 Day Total 31337 31337 31337 % Weekday 100% Average % Week 100% 100% Average AM Peak 11:30 AM 11:30 AM 11:30 AM 15-min Vol 534 534 534 PM Peak 6:00 PM 6:00 PM 6:00 PM 15-min Vol 645 645 645 Comments: Report generated on 4/1/2019 12:30 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) Type of report: Tube Count - Volume Data LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Oakes Blvd and Valewood Dr QC JOB #: 14799121 SPECIFIC LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Oakes Blvd and Valewood Dr DIRECTION: EB, WB CITY/STATE: Naples, FL DATE: Mar 7 2019 - Mar 7 2019 Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Average Weekday Sat Sun Average Week Start Time Average Week Profile 7 Mar 19 15-min Traffic 15-min Traffic 12:00 AM 81 81 81 [ 12:15 AM 73 73 73 ❑ 12:30 AM 61 61 61 ❑ 12:45 AM 61 61 61 ❑ 01:00 AM 54 54 54 ❑ 01:15 AM 57 57 57 ❑ 01:30 AM 38 38 38 0 01:45 AM 35 35 35 0 02:00 AM 56 56 56 ❑ 02:15 AM 44 44 44 02:30 AM 46 46 46 ❑ 02:45 AM 46 46 46 ❑ 03:00 AM 47 47 47 ❑ 03:15 AM 46 46 46 ❑ 03:30 AM 71 71 71 ❑ 03:45 AM 64 64 64 ❑ 04:00 AM 114 114 114 0 04:15 AM 119 119 119 0 04:30 AM 144 144 144 0 04:45 AM 165 165 165 0 05:00 AM 199 199 199 0 05:15 AM 326 326 326 C� 05:30 AM 313 313 313 05:45 AM 414 414 414 Day Total Weekday Average Week Average AM Peak 15-min Vol PM Peak 15-min Vol Comments: Report generated on 4/1/2019 12:30 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) Type of report: Tube Count - Volume Data LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Oakes Blvd and Valewood Dr QCJOB#: 14799121 SPECIFIC LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Oakes Blvd and Valewood Dr DIRECTION: EB, WB CITY/STATE: Naples, FL DATE: Mar 7 2019 - Mar 7 2019 Start Time Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri 7 Mar 19 Average Weekday 15-min Traffic Sat Sun Average Week 15-min Traffic Average Week Profile 06:00 AM 06:15 AM 06:30 AM 06:45 AM 07:00 AM 07:15 AM 07:30 AM 07:45 AM 08:00 AM 08:15 AM 08:30 AM 08:45 AM 09:00 AM 09:15 AM 09:30 AM 09:45 AM 10:00 AM 10:15 AM 10:30 AM 10:45 AM 11:00 AM 11:15 AM 11:30 AM 11:45 AM 661 778 930 937 1024 1071 1054 1137 1137 1124 1047 906 961 1001 904 1015 949 916 1057 924 1017 980 1047 1047 661 778 930 937 1024 1071 1054 1137 1137 1124 1047 906 961 1001 904 1015 949 916 1057 924 1017 980 1047 1047 661 778 930 937 1024 1071 1054 1137 1137 1124 1047 906 961 1001 904 1015 949 916 1057 924 1017 980 1047 1047 C C C C Day Total Weekday Average Week Average AM Peak 15-min Vol PM Peak 15-min Vol Comments: Report generated on 4/1/2019 12:30 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) Type of report: Tube Count - Volume Data LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Oakes Blvd and Valewood Dr QCJOB#: 14799121 SPECIFIC LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Oakes Blvd and Valewood Dr DIRECTION: EB, WB CITY/STATE: Naples, FL DATE: Mar 7 2019 - Mar 7 2019 Start Time Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri 7 Mar 19 Average Weekday 15-min Traffic Sat Sun Average Week 15-min Traffic Average Week Profile 12:00 PM 1020 1020 1020 C 12:15 PM 1009 1009 1009 C 12:30 PM 1058 1058 1058 C 12:45 PM 949 949 949 C 01:00 PM 996 996 996 01:15 PM 957 957 957 01:30 PM 1003 1003 1003 01:45 PM 1080 1080 1080 02:00 PM 1037 1037 1037 02:15 PM 1043 1043 1043 02:30 PM 1135 1135 1135 02:45 PM 1045 1045 1045 03:00 PM 1144 1144 1144 03:15 PM 1170 1170 1170 03:30 PM 1138 1138 1138 03:45 PM 1037 1037 1037 04:00 PM 859 859 859 04:15 PM 790 790 790 04:30 PM 842 842 842 04:45 PM 922 922 922 05:00 PM 947 947 947 05:15 PM 854 854 854 05:30 PM 926 926 926 05:45 PM 914 914 914 Day Total Weekday Average Week Average AM Peak 15-min Vol PM Peak 15-min Vol Comments: Report generated on 4/1/2019 12:30 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) Type of report: Tube Count - Volume Data LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Oakes Blvd and Valewood Dr QCJOB#: 14799121 SPECIFIC LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Oakes Blvd and Valewood Dr DIRECTION: EB, WB CITY/STATE: Naples, FL DATE: Mar 7 2019 - Mar 7 2019 Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Average Weekday Sat Sun Average Week Start Time Average Week Profile 7 Mar 19 15-min Traffic 15-min Traffic 06:00 PM 962 962 962 C 06:15 PM 828 828 828 C 06:30 PM 998 998 998 C 06:45 PM 826 826 826 07:00 PM 712 712 712 07:15 PM 728 728 728 07:30 PM 705 705 705 07:45 PM 631 631 631 0 08:00 PM 592 592 592 0 08:15 PM 541 541 541 0 08:30 PM 558 558 558 0 08:45 PM 488 488 488 0 09:00 PM 494 494 494 0 09:15 PM 463 463 463 0 09:30 PM 436 436 436 0 09:45 PM 426 426 426 0 10:00 PM 335 335 335 0 10:15 PM 298 298 298 10:30 PM 255 255 255 0 10:45 PM 214 214 214 0 11:00 PM 212 212 212 0 11:15 PM 134 134 134 11:30 PM 128 128 128 11:45 PM 88 88 88 ❑ Day Total 62225 62225 62225 % Weekday 100% Average % Week 100% 100% Average AM Peak 7:45 AM 7:45 AM 7:45 AM 15-min Vol 1137 1137 1137 PM Peak 3:15 PM 3:15 PM 3:15 PM 15-min Vol 1170 1170 1170 Comments: Report generated on 4/1/2019 12:30 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) Type of report: Tube Count - Volume Data LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Oakes Blvd and Valewood Dr QC JOB #: 14799121 SPECIFIC LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Oakes Blvd and Valewood Dr DIRECTION: WB CITY/STATE: Naples, FL DATE: Mar 7 2019 - Mar 7 2019 Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Average Weekday Sat Sun Average Week Start Time Average Week Profile 7 Mar 19 15-min Traffic 15-min Traffic 12:00 AM 24 24 24 0 12:15 AM 24 24 24 12:30 AM 26 26 26 12:45 AM 25 25 25 01:00 AM 16 16 16 01:15 AM 25 25 25 0 01:30 AM 15 15 15 0 01:45 AM 14 14 14 0 02:00 AM 27 27 27 0 02:15 AM 17 17 17 02:30 AM 33 33 33 ❑ 02:45 AM 27 27 27 03:00 AM 32 32 32 ❑ 03:15 AM 36 36 36 ❑ 03:30 AM 51 51 51 03:45 AM 47 47 47 ❑ 04:00 AM 65 65 65 ❑ 04:15 AM 66 66 66 ❑ 04:30 AM 101 101 101 ❑ 04:45 AM 117 117 117 05:00 AM 146 146 146 ❑ 05:15 AM 246 246 246 05:30 AM 226 226 226 05:45 AM 299 299 299 Day Total Weekday Average Week Average AM Peak 15-min Vol PM Peak 15-min Vol Comments: Report generated on 4/1/2019 12:30 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) Type of report: Tube Count - Volume Data LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Oakes Blvd and Valewood Dr QCJOB#: 14799121 SPECIFIC LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Oakes Blvd and Valewood Dr DIRECTION: WB CITY/STATE: Naples, FL DATE: Mar 7 2019 - Mar 7 2019 Start Time Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri 7 Mar 19 Average Weekday 15-min Traffic Sat Sun Average Week 15-min Traffic Average Week Profile 06:00 AM 457 457 457 C 06:15 AM 490 490 490 C 06:30 AM 533 533 533 C 06:45 AM 568 568 568 C 07:00 AM 706 706 706 07:15 AM 701 701 701 07:30 AM 686 686 686 07:45 AM 708 708 708 08:00 AM 727 727 727 08:15 AM 705 705 705 08:30 AM 622 622 622 08:45 AM 475 475 475 09:00 AM 562 562 562 09:15 AM 584 584 584 09:30 AM 499 499 499 09:45 AM 545 545 545 10:00 AM 581 581 581 10:15 AM 497 497 497 10:30 AM 569 569 569 10:45 AM 519 519 519 11:00 AM 531 531 531 11:15 AM 559 559 559 11:30 AM 513 513 513 11:45 AM 548 548 548 Day Total Weekday Average Week Average AM Peak 15-min Vol PM Peak 15-min Vol Comments: Report generated on 4/1/2019 12:30 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) Type of report: Tube Count - Volume Data LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Oakes Blvd and Valewood Dr QCJOB#: 14799121 SPECIFIC LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Oakes Blvd and Valewood Dr DIRECTION: WB CITY/STATE: Naples, FL DATE: Mar 7 2019 - Mar 7 2019 Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Average Weekday Sat Sun Average Week Start Time Average Week Profile 7 Mar 19 15-min Traffic 15-min Traffic 12:00 PM 528 528 528 C 12:15 PM 547 547 547 C 12:30 PM 537 537 537 C 12:45 PM 454 454 454 C 01:00 PM 476 476 476 01:15 PM 457 457 457 01:30 PM 521 521 521 01:45 PM 528 528 528 02:00 PM 565 565 565 02:15 PM 541 541 541 02:30 PM 559 559 559 02:45 PM 547 547 547 03:00 PM 554 554 554 03:15 PM 550 550 550 03:30 PM 533 533 533 03:45 PM 491 491 491 04:00 PM 286 286 286 0 04:15 PM 220 220 220 0 04:30 PM 260 260 260 0 04:45 PM 333 333 333 0 05:00 PM 351 351 351 0 05:15 PM 271 271 271 0 05:30 PM 335 335 335 0 05:45 PM 344 344 344 0 Day Total Weekday Average Week Average AM Peak 15-min Vol PM Peak 15-min Vol Comments: Report generated on 4/1/2019 12:30 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) Type of report: Tube Count - Volume Data LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Oakes Blvd and Valewood Dr QCJOB#: 14799121 SPECIFIC LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Oakes Blvd and Valewood Dr DIRECTION: WB CITY/STATE: Naples, FL DATE: Mar 7 2019 - Mar 7 2019 Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Average Weekday Sat Sun Average Week Start Time Average Week Profile 7 Mar 19 15-min Traffic 15-min Traffic 06:00 PM 317 317 317 C 06:15 PM 334 334 334 C 06:30 PM 535 535 535 06:45 PM 415 415 415 07:00 PM 258 258 258 0 07:15 PM 280 280 280 0 07:30 PM 270 270 270 0 07:45 PM 205 205 205 0 08:00 PM 209 209 209 0 08:15 PM 220 220 220 0 08:30 PM 180 180 180 0 08:45 PM 172 172 172 0 09:00 PM 181 181 181 0 09:15 PM 160 160 160 ❑ 09:30 PM 122 122 122 ❑ 09:45 PM 138 138 138 ❑ 10:00 PM 107 107 107 ❑ 10:15 PM 83 83 83 ❑ 10:30 PM 89 89 89 ❑ 10:45 PM 73 73 73 ❑ 11:00 PM 63 63 63 ❑ 11:15 PM 37 37 37 ❑ 11:30 PM 43 43 43 ❑ 11:45 PM 19 19 19 Day Total 30888 30888 30888 % Weekday 100% Average % Week 100% 100% Average AM Peak 8:00 AM 8:00 AM 8:00 AM 15-min Vol 727 727 727 PM Peak 2:00 PM 2:00 PM 2:00 PM 15-min Vol 565 565 565 Comments: Report generated on 4/1/2019 12:30 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) Type of report: Tube Count - Volume Data LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Palazzo Dr and Logan Blvd QC JOB #: 14799122 SPECIFIC LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Palazzo Dr and Logan Blvd DIRECTION: EB CITY/STATE: Naples, FL DATE: Mar 7 2019 - Mar 7 2019 Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Average Weekday Sat Sun Average Week Start Time Average Week Profile 7 Mar 19 15-min Traffic 15-min Traffic 12:00 AM 52 52 52 [ 12:15 AM 45 45 45 ❑ 12:30 AM 35 35 35 ❑ 12:45 AM 30 30 30 ❑ 01:00 AM 38 38 38 ❑ 01:15 AM 28 28 28 ❑ 01:30 AM 24 24 24 ❑ 01:45 AM 23 23 23 ❑ 02:00 AM 23 23 23 ❑ 02:15 AM 25 25 25 ❑ 02:30 AM 17 17 17 02:45 AM 15 15 15 03:00 AM 13 13 13 0 03:15 AM 7 7 7 03:30 AM 18 18 18 0 03:45 AM 20 20 20 0 04:00 AM 53 53 53 ❑ 04:15 AM 50 50 50 ❑ 04:30 AM 40 40 40 ❑ 04:45 AM 44 44 44 ❑ 05:00 AM 58 58 58 ❑ 05:15 AM 72 72 72 ❑ 05:30 AM 78 78 78 ❑ 05:45 AM 123 123 123 ❑ Day Total Weekday Average Week Average AM Peak 15-min Vol PM Peak 15-min Vol Comments: Report generated on 4/1/2019 12:30 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) Type of report: Tube Count - Volume Data LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Palazzo Dr and Logan Blvd QC JOB #: 14799122 SPECIFIC LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Palazzo Dr and Logan Blvd DIRECTION: EB CITY/STATE: Naples, FL DATE: Mar 7 2019 - Mar 7 2019 Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Average Weekday Sat Sun Average Week Start Time Average Week Profile 7 Mar 19 15-min Traffic 15-min Traffic 06:00 AM 206 206 206 C 06:15 AM 322 322 322 C 06:30 AM 418 418 418 C 06:45 AM 346 346 346 C 07:00 AM 316 316 316 07:15 AM 349 349 349 07:30 AM 367 367 367 07:45 AM 379 379 379 08:00 AM 373 373 373 08:15 AM 369 369 369 08:30 AM 382 382 382 08:45 AM 364 364 364 09:00 AM 362 362 362 09:15 AM 346 346 346 09:30 AM 389 389 389 09:45 AM 410 410 410 10:00 AM 336 336 336 0 10:15 AM 394 394 394 10:30 AM 438 438 438 10:45 AM 397 397 397 11:00 AM 388 388 388 11:15 AM 424 424 424 11:30 AM 504 504 504 11:45 AM 448 448 448 Day Total Weekday Average Week Average AM Peak 15-min Vol PM Peak 15-min Vol Comments: Report generated on 4/1/2019 12:30 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) Type of report: Tube Count - Volume Data LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Palazzo Dr and Logan Blvd QC JOB #: 14799122 SPECIFIC LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Palazzo Dr and Logan Blvd DIRECTION: EB CITY/STATE: Naples, FL DATE: Mar 7 2019 - Mar 7 2019 Start Time Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri 7 Mar 19 Average Weekday 15-min Traffic Sat Sun Average Week 15-min Traffic Average Week Profile 12:00 PM 12:15 PM 12:30 PM 12:45 PM 01:00 PM 01:15 PM 01:30 PM 01:45 PM 02:00 PM 02:15 PM 02:30 PM 02:45 PM 03:00 PM 03:15 PM 03:30 PM 03:45 PM 04:00 PM 04:15 PM 04:30 PM 04:45 PM 05:00 PM 05:15 PM 05:30 PM 05:45 PM 430 428 459 445 475 496 470 536 464 465 560 468 602 555 627 539 525 549 579 575 599 533 593 564 430 428 459 445 475 496 470 536 464 465 560 468 602 555 627 539 525 549 579 575 599 533 593 564 430 428 459 445 475 496 470 536 464 465 560 468 602 555 627 539 525 549 579 575 599 533 593 564 C C C C Day Total Weekday Average Week Average AM Peak 15-min Vol PM Peak 15-min Vol Comments: Report generated on 4/1/2019 12:30 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) Type of report: Tube Count - Volume Data LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Palazzo Dr and Logan Blvd QC JOB #: 14799122 SPECIFIC LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Palazzo Dr and Logan Blvd DIRECTION: EB CITY/STATE: Naples, FL DATE: Mar 7 2019 - Mar 7 2019 Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Average Weekday Sat Sun Average Week Start Time Average Week Profile 7 Mar 19 15-min Traffic 15-min Traffic 06:00 PM 614 614 614 C 06:15 PM 524 524 524 C 06:30 PM 448 448 448 C 06:45 PM 377 377 377 07:00 PM 420 420 420 07:15 PM 431 431 431 07:30 PM 412 412 412 07:45 PM 393 393 393 08:00 PM 371 371 371 08:15 PM 309 309 309 0 08:30 PM 332 332 332 0 08:45 PM 324 324 324 0 09:00 PM 273 273 273 0 09:15 PM 313 313 313 0 09:30 PM 295 295 295 0 09:45 PM 268 268 268 0 10:00 PM 216 216 216 0 10:15 PM 202 202 202 0 10:30 PM 159 159 159 0 10:45 PM 144 144 144 0 11:00 PM 130 130 130 0 11:15 PM 89 89 89 0 11:30 PM 77 77 77 0 11:45 PM 78 78 78 0 Day Total 29693 29693 29693 % Weekday 100% Average % Week 100% 100% Average AM Peak 11:30 AM 11:30 AM 11:30 AM 15-min Vol 504 504 504 PM Peak 3:30 PM 3:30 PM 3:30 PM 15-min Vol 627 627 627 Comments: Report generated on 4/1/2019 12:30 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) Type of report: Tube Count - Volume Data LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Palazzo Dr and Logan Blvd QC JOB #: 14799122 SPECIFIC LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Palazzo Dr and Logan Blvd DIRECTION: EB, WB CITY/STATE: Naples, FL DATE: Mar 7 2019 - Mar 7 2019 Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Average Weekday Sat Sun Average Week Start Time Average Week Profile 7 Mar 19 15-min Traffic 15-min Traffic 12:00 AM 70 70 70 [ 12:15 AM 67 67 67 ❑ 12:30 AM 57 57 57 ❑ 12:45 AM 54 54 54 ❑ 01:00 AM 60 60 60 ❑ 01:15 AM 44 44 44 ❑ 01:30 AM 49 49 49 ❑ 01:45 AM 37 37 37 02:00 AM 34 34 34 0 02:15 AM 52 52 52 ❑ 02:30 AM 35 35 35 0 02:45 AM 52 52 52 ❑ 03:00 AM 36 36 36 0 03:15 AM 35 35 35 0 03:30 AM 51 51 51 ❑ 03:45 AM 69 69 69 ❑ 04:00 AM 101 101 101 ❑ 04:15 AM 115 115 115 0 04:30 AM 106 106 106 0 04:45 AM 144 144 144 0 05:00 AM 177 177 177 0 05:15 AM 231 231 231 C� 05:30 AM 298 298 298 05:45 AM 341 341 341 Day Total Weekday Average Week Average AM Peak 15-min Vol PM Peak 15-min Vol Comments: Report generated on 4/1/2019 12:30 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) Type of report: Tube Count - Volume Data LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Palazzo Dr and Logan Blvd QC JOB #: 14799122 SPECIFIC LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Palazzo Dr and Logan Blvd DIRECTION: EB, WB CITY/STATE: Naples, FL DATE: Mar 7 2019 - Mar 7 2019 Start Time Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri 7 Mar 19 Average Weekday 15-min Traffic Sat Sun Average Week 15-min Traffic Average Week Profile 06:00 AM 497 497 497 C 06:15 AM 753 753 753 C 06:30 AM 908 908 908 C 06:45 AM 864 864 864 C 07:00 AM 885 885 885 07:15 AM 991 991 991 07:30 AM 1104 1104 1104 07:45 AM 1020 1020 1020 08:00 AM 1064 1064 1064 08:15 AM 1049 1049 1049 08:30 AM 1015 1015 1015 08:45 AM 890 890 890 09:00 AM 790 790 790 09:15 AM 856 856 856 09:30 AM 897 897 897 09:45 AM 871 871 871 10:00 AM 776 776 776 10:15 AM 873 873 873 10:30 AM 903 903 903 10:45 AM 911 911 911 11:00 AM 841 841 841 11:15 AM 818 818 818 11:30 AM 990 990 990 11:45 AM 861 861 861 Day Total Weekday Average Week Average AM Peak 15-min Vol PM Peak 15-min Vol Comments: Report generated on 4/1/2019 12:30 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) Type of report: Tube Count - Volume Data LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Palazzo Dr and Logan Blvd QC JOB #: 14799122 SPECIFIC LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Palazzo Dr and Logan Blvd DIRECTION: EB, WB CITY/STATE: Naples, FL DATE: Mar 7 2019 - Mar 7 2019 Start Time Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri 7 Mar 19 Average Weekday 15-min Traffic Sat Sun Average Week 15-min Traffic Average Week Profile 12:00 PM 921 921 921 C 12:15 PM 906 906 906 C 12:30 PM 924 924 924 C 12:45 PM 868 868 868 C 01:00 PM 909 909 909 01:15 PM 894 894 894 01:30 PM 856 856 856 01:45 PM 1020 1020 1020 02:00 PM 903 903 903 02:15 PM 1026 1026 1026 02:30 PM 1079 1079 1079 02:45 PM 967 967 967 03:00 PM 1071 1071 1071 03:15 PM 1032 1032 1032 03:30 PM 1096 1096 1096 03:45 PM 993 993 993 04:00 PM 983 983 983 04:15 PM 885 885 885 04:30 PM 768 768 768 04:45 PM 787 787 787 05:00 PM 881 881 881 05:15 PM 837 837 837 05:30 PM 835 835 835 05:45 PM 863 863 863 Day Total Weekday Average Week Average AM Peak 15-min Vol PM Peak 15-min Vol Comments: Report generated on 4/1/2019 12:30 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) Type of report: Tube Count - Volume Data LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Palazzo Dr and Logan Blvd QC JOB #: 14799122 SPECIFIC LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Palazzo Dr and Logan Blvd DIRECTION: EB, WB CITY/STATE: Naples, FL DATE: Mar 7 2019 - Mar 7 2019 Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Average Weekday Sat Sun Average Week Start Time Average Week Profile 7 Mar 19 15-min Traffic 15-min Traffic 06:00 PM 917 917 917 C 06:15 PM 815 815 815 C 06:30 PM 748 748 748 C 06:45 PM 879 879 879 07:00 PM 710 710 710 07:15 PM 655 655 655 07:30 PM 678 678 678 07:45 PM 644 644 644 08:00 PM 564 564 564 0 08:15 PM 466 466 466 0 08:30 PM 530 530 530 0 08:45 PM 491 491 491 0 09:00 PM 408 408 408 0 09:15 PM 479 479 479 0 09:30 PM 447 447 447 0 09:45 PM 377 377 377 0 10:00 PM 342 342 342 0 10:15 PM 302 302 302 0 10:30 PM 236 236 236 0 10:45 PM 231 231 231 11:00 PM 205 205 205 11:15 PM 141 141 141 0 11:30 PM 114 114 114 11:45 PM 118 118 118 0 Day Total 57543 57543 57543 % Weekday 100% Average % Week 100% 100% Average AM Peak 7:30 AM 7:30 AM 7:30 AM 15-min Vol 1104 1104 1104 PM Peak 3:30 PM 3:30 PM 3:30 PM 15-min Vol 1096 1096 1096 Comments: Report generated on 4/1/2019 12:30 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) Type of report: Tube Count - Volume Data LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Palazzo Dr and Logan Blvd QC JOB #: 14799122 SPECIFIC LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Palazzo Dr and Logan Blvd DIRECTION: WB CITY/STATE: Naples, FL DATE: Mar 7 2019 - Mar 7 2019 Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Average Weekday Sat Sun Average Week Start Time Average Week Profile 7 Mar 19 15-min Traffic 15-min Traffic 12:00 AM 18 18 18 0 12:15 AM 22 22 22 0 12:30 AM 22 22 22 0 12:45 AM 24 24 24 0 01:00 AM 22 22 22 0 01:15 AM 16 16 16 0 01:30 AM 25 25 25 ❑ 01:45 AM 14 14 14 0 02:00 AM 11 11 11 0 02:15 AM 27 27 27 ❑ 02:30 AM 18 18 18 02:45 AM 37 37 37 ❑ 03:00 AM 23 23 23 0 03:15 AM 28 28 28 ❑ 03:30 AM 33 33 33 ❑ 03:45 AM 49 49 49 ❑ 04:00 AM 48 48 48 ❑ 04:15 AM 65 65 65 ❑ 04:30 AM 66 66 66 ❑ 04:45 AM 100 100 100 ❑ 05:00 AM 119 119 119 ❑ 05:15 AM 159 159 159 C� 05:30 AM 220 220 220 ❑ 05:45 AM 218 218 218 Day Total Weekday Average Week Average AM Peak 15-min Vol PM Peak 15-min Vol Comments: Report generated on 4/1/2019 12:30 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) Type of report: Tube Count - Volume Data LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Palazzo Dr and Logan Blvd QC JOB #: 14799122 SPECIFIC LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Palazzo Dr and Logan Blvd DIRECTION: WB CITY/STATE: Naples, FL DATE: Mar 7 2019 - Mar 7 2019 Start Time Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri 7 Mar 19 Average Weekday 15-min Traffic Sat Sun Average Week 15-min Traffic Average Week Profile 06:00 AM 291 291 291 C 06:15 AM 431 431 431 C 06:30 AM 490 490 490 C 06:45 AM 518 518 518 C 07:00 AM 569 569 569 07:15 AM 642 642 642 07:30 AM 737 737 737 07:45 AM 641 641 641 08:00 AM 691 691 691 08:15 AM 680 680 680 08:30 AM 633 633 633 08:45 AM 526 526 526 09:00 AM 428 428 428 09:15 AM 510 510 510 09:30 AM 508 508 508 09:45 AM 461 461 461 10:00 AM 440 440 440 10:15 AM 479 479 479 10:30 AM 465 465 465 10:45 AM 514 514 514 11:00 AM 453 453 453 11:15 AM 394 394 394 0 11:30 AM 486 486 486 11:45 AM 413 413 413 Day Total Weekday Average Week Average AM Peak 15-min Vol PM Peak 15-min Vol Comments: Report generated on 4/1/2019 12:30 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) Type of report: Tube Count - Volume Data LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Palazzo Dr and Logan Blvd QC JOB #: 14799122 SPECIFIC LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Palazzo Dr and Logan Blvd DIRECTION: WB CITY/STATE: Naples, FL DATE: Mar 7 2019 - Mar 7 2019 Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Average Weekday Sat Sun Average Week Start Time Average Week Profile 7 Mar 19 15-min Traffic 15-min Traffic 12:00 PM 491 491 491 C 12:15 PM 478 478 478 C 12:30 PM 465 465 465 C 12:45 PM 423 423 423 01:00 PM 434 434 434 01:15 PM 398 398 398 0 01:30 PM 386 386 386 0 01:45 PM 484 484 484 02:00 PM 439 439 439 02:15 PM 561 561 561 02:30 PM 519 519 519 02:45 PM 499 499 499 03:00 PM 469 469 469 03:15 PM 477 477 477 03:30 PM 469 469 469 03:45 PM 454 454 454 04:00 PM 458 458 458 04:15 PM 336 336 336 0 04:30 PM 189 189 189 0 04:45 PM 212 212 212 0 05:00 PM 282 282 282 0 05:15 PM 304 304 304 0 05:30 PM 242 242 242 0 05:45 PM 299 299 299 0 Day Total Weekday Average Week Average AM Peak 15-min Vol PM Peak 15-min Vol Comments: Report generated on 4/1/2019 12:30 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) Type of report: Tube Count - Volume Data LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Palazzo Dr and Logan Blvd QC JOB #: 14799122 SPECIFIC LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Palazzo Dr and Logan Blvd DIRECTION: WB CITY/STATE: Naples, FL DATE: Mar 7 2019 - Mar 7 2019 Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Average Weekday Sat Sun Average Week Start Time Average Week Profile 7 Mar 19 15-min Traffic 15-min Traffic 06:00 PM 303 303 303 06:15 PM 291 291 291 0 06:30 PM 300 300 300 0 06:45 PM 502 502 502 07:00 PM 290 290 290 0 07:15 PM 224 224 224 0 07:30 PM 266 266 266 0 07:45 PM 251 251 251 0 08:00 PM 193 193 193 08:15 PM 157 157 157 0 08:30 PM 198 198 198 0 08:45 PM 167 167 167 0 09:00 PM 135 135 135 0 09:15 PM 166 166 166 0 09:30 PM 152 152 152 0 09:45 PM 109 109 109 0 10:00 PM 126 126 126 0 10:15 PM 100 100 100 E-7 10:30 PM 77 77 77 0 10:45 PM 87 87 87 0 11:00 PM 75 75 75 E71 11:15 PM 52 52 52 ❑ 11:30 PM 37 37 37 ❑ 11:45 PM 40 40 40 ❑ Day Total 27850 27850 27850 % Weekday 100% Average % Week 100% 100% Average AM Peak 7:30 AM 7:30 AM 7:30 AM 15-min Vol 737 737 737 PM Peak 2:15 PM 2:15 PM 2:15 PM 15-min Vol 561 561 561 Comments: Report generated on 4/1/2019 12:30 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) Type of report: Tube Count - Volume Data LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Valewood Dr and Palazzo Dr QC JOB #: 14799125 SPECIFIC LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Valewood Dr and Palazzo Dr DIRECTION: EB CITY/STATE: Naples, FL DATE: Mar 7 2019 - Mar 7 2019 Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Average Weekday Sat Sun Average Week Start Time Average Week Profile 7 Mar 19 15-min Traffic 15-min Traffic 12:00 AM 56 56 56 [ 12:15 AM 51 51 51 ❑ 12:30 AM 35 35 35 ❑ 12:45 AM 39 39 39 [I 01:00 AM 37 37 37 ❑ 01:15 AM 29 29 29 ❑ 01:30 AM 23 23 23 ❑ 01:45 AM 23 23 23 ❑ 02:00 AM 29 29 29 ❑ 02:15 AM 25 25 25 ❑ 02:30 AM 12 12 12 0 02:45 AM 19 19 19 0 03:00 AM 11 11 11 0 03:15 AM 10 10 10 03:30 AM 17 17 17 0 03:45 AM 16 16 16 04:00 AM 46 46 46 ❑ 04:15 AM 55 55 55 ❑ 04:30 AM 37 37 37 ❑ 04:45 AM 45 45 45 ❑ 05:00 AM 45 45 45 ❑ 05:15 AM 76 76 76 ❑ 05:30 AM 77 77 77 ❑ 05:45 AM 102 102 102 ❑ Day Total Weekday Average Week Average AM Peak 15-min Vol PM Peak 15-min Vol Comments: Report generated on 4/1/2019 12:30 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) Type of report: Tube Count - Volume Data LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Valewood Dr and Palazzo Dr QC JOB #: 14799125 SPECIFIC LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Valewood Dr and Palazzo Dr DIRECTION: EB CITY/STATE: Naples, FL DATE: Mar 7 2019 - Mar 7 2019 Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Average Weekday Sat Sun Average Week Start Time Average Week Profile 7 Mar 19 15-min Traffic 15-min Traffic 06:00 AM 186 186 186 C 06:15 AM 296 296 296 C 06:30 AM 382 382 382 C 06:45 AM 379 379 379 07:00 AM 306 306 306 0 07:15 AM 342 342 342 0 07:30 AM 347 347 347 07:45 AM 396 396 396 08:00 AM 392 392 392 08:15 AM 363 363 363 08:30 AM 371 371 371 08:45 AM 388 388 388 09:00 AM 332 332 332 0 09:15 AM 379 379 379 09:30 AM 386 386 386 09:45 AM 395 395 395 10:00 AM 379 379 379 10:15 AM 391 391 391 10:30 AM 399 399 399 10:45 AM 429 429 429 11:00 AM 404 404 404 11:15 AM 397 397 397 11:30 AM 493 493 493 11:45 AM 452 452 452 Day Total Weekday Average Week Average AM Peak 15-min Vol PM Peak 15-min Vol Comments: Report generated on 4/1/2019 12:30 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) Type of report: Tube Count - Volume Data LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Valewood Dr and Palazzo Dr QC JOB #: 14799125 SPECIFIC LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Valewood Dr and Palazzo Dr DIRECTION: EB CITY/STATE: Naples, FL DATE: Mar 7 2019 - Mar 7 2019 Start Time Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri 7 Mar 19 Average Weekday 15-min Traffic Sat Sun Average Week 15-min Traffic Average Week Profile 12:00 PM 455 455 455 C 12:15 PM 428 428 428 C 12:30 PM 424 424 424 C 12:45 PM 457 457 457 C 01:00 PM 453 453 453 01:15 PM 487 487 487 01:30 PM 483 483 483 01:45 PM 484 484 484 02:00 PM 487 487 487 02:15 PM 488 488 488 02:30 PM 481 481 481 02:45 PM 512 512 512 03:00 PM 533 533 533 03:15 PM 599 599 599 03:30 PM 582 582 582 03:45 PM 567 567 567 04:00 PM 517 517 517 04:15 PM 530 530 530 04:30 PM 544 544 544 04:45 PM 591 591 591 05:00 PM 582 582 582 05:15 PM 562 562 562 05:30 PM 543 543 543 05:45 PM 552 552 552 Day Total Weekday Average Week Average AM Peak 15-min Vol PM Peak 15-min Vol Comments: Report generated on 4/1/2019 12:30 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) Type of report: Tube Count - Volume Data LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Valewood Dr and Palazzo Dr QC JOB #: 14799125 SPECIFIC LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Valewood Dr and Palazzo Dr DIRECTION: EB CITY/STATE: Naples, FL DATE: Mar 7 2019 - Mar 7 2019 Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Average Weekday Sat Sun Average Week Start Time Average Week Profile 7 Mar 19 15-min Traffic 15-min Traffic 06:00 PM 625 625 625 C 06:15 PM 504 504 504 C 06:30 PM 452 452 452 C 06:45 PM 393 393 393 C 07:00 PM 403 403 403 07:15 PM 448 448 448 07:30 PM 427 427 427 07:45 PM 370 370 370 08:00 PM 377 377 377 08:15 PM 317 317 317 0 08:30 PM 338 338 338 0 08:45 PM 320 320 320 0 09:00 PM 315 315 315 0 09:15 PM 275 275 275 0 09:30 PM 304 304 304 0 09:45 PM 289 289 289 0 10:00 PM 211 211 211 0 10:15 PM 208 208 208 0 10:30 PM 182 182 182 0 10:45 PM 135 135 135 0 11:00 PM 143 143 143 0 11:15 PM 105 105 105 11:30 PM 77 77 77 11:45 PM 71 71 71 Day Total 29529 29529 29529 % Weekday 100% Average % Week 100% 100% Average AM Peak 11:30 AM 11:30 AM 11:30 AM 15-min Vol 493 493 493 PM Peak 6:00 PM 6:00 PM 6:00 PM 15-min Vol 625 625 625 Comments: Report generated on 4/1/2019 12:30 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) Type of report: Tube Count - Volume Data LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Valewood Dr and Palazzo Dr QC JOB #: 14799125 SPECIFIC LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Valewood Dr and Palazzo Dr DIRECTION: EB, WB CITY/STATE: Naples, FL DATE: Mar 7 2019 - Mar 7 2019 Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Average Weekday Sat Sun Average Week Start Time Average Week Profile 7 Mar 19 15-min Traffic 15-min Traffic 12:00 AM 80 80 80 [ 12:15 AM 75 75 75 ❑ 12:30 AM 59 59 59 ❑ 12:45 AM 65 65 65 ❑ 01:00 AM 52 52 52 ❑ 01:15 AM 54 54 54 ❑ 01:30 AM 37 37 37 ❑ 01:45 AM 35 35 35 0 02:00 AM 56 56 56 ❑ 02:15 AM 43 43 43 ❑ 02:30 AM 42 42 42 ❑ 02:45 AM 47 47 47 ❑ 03:00 AM 40 40 40 ❑ 03:15 AM 44 44 44 ❑ 03:30 AM 66 66 66 ❑ 03:45 AM 62 62 62 ❑ 04:00 AM 109 109 109 0 04:15 AM 121 121 121 0 04:30 AM 135 135 135 04:45 AM 165 165 165 05:00 AM 192 192 192 05:15 AM 296 296 296 05:30 AM 303 303 303 05:45 AM 384 384 384 Day Total Weekday Average Week Average AM Peak 15-min Vol PM Peak 15-min Vol Comments: Report generated on 4/1/2019 12:30 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) Type of report: Tube Count - Volume Data LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Valewood Dr and Palazzo Dr QC JOB #: 14799125 SPECIFIC LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Valewood Dr and Palazzo Dr DIRECTION: EB, WB CITY/STATE: Naples, FL DATE: Mar 7 2019 - Mar 7 2019 Start Time Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri 7 Mar 19 Average Weekday 15-min Traffic Sat Sun Average Week 15-min Traffic Average Week Profile 06:00 AM 633 633 633 C 06:15 AM 766 766 766 C ] 06:30 AM 889 889 889 C 06:45 AM 957 957 957 C 07:00 AM 962 962 962 07:15 AM 1006 1006 1006 07:30 AM 974 974 974 07:45 AM 1048 1048 1048 08:00 AM 1055 1055 1055 08:15 AM 990 990 990 08:30 AM 914 914 914 08:45 AM 822 822 822 09:00 AM 840 840 840 09:15 AM 895 895 895 09:30 AM 857 857 857 09:45 AM 864 864 864 10:00 AM 864 864 864 10:15 AM 860 860 860 10:30 AM 900 900 900 10:45 AM 879 879 879 11:00 AM 858 858 858 11:15 AM 891 891 891 11:30 AM 939 939 939 11:45 AM 939 939 939 Day Total Weekday Average Week Average AM Peak 15-min Vol PM Peak 15-min Vol Comments: Report generated on 4/1/2019 12:30 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) Type of report: Tube Count - Volume Data LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Valewood Dr and Palazzo Dr QC JOB #: 14799125 SPECIFIC LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Valewood Dr and Palazzo Dr DIRECTION: EB, WB CITY/STATE: Naples, FL DATE: Mar 7 2019 - Mar 7 2019 Start Time Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri 7 Mar 19 Average Weekday 15-min Traffic Sat Sun Average Week 15-min Traffic Average Week Profile 12:00 PM 910 910 910 C 12:15 PM 916 916 916 C 12:30 PM 877 877 877 C 12:45 PM 846 846 846 C 01:00 PM 883 883 883 01:15 PM 858 858 858 01:30 PM 962 962 962 01:45 PM 963 963 963 02:00 PM 986 986 986 02:15 PM 1026 1026 1026 02:30 PM 946 946 946 02:45 PM 973 973 973 03:00 PM 997 997 997 03:15 PM 1104 1104 1104 03:30 PM 1050 1050 1050 03:45 PM 1009 1009 1009 04:00 PM 795 795 795 04:15 PM 703 703 703 04:30 PM 732 732 732 04:45 PM 861 861 861 05:00 PM 870 870 870 05:15 PM 776 776 776 05:30 PM 824 824 824 05:45 PM 836 836 836 Day Total Weekday Average Week Average AM Peak 15-min Vol PM Peak 15-min Vol Comments: Report generated on 4/1/2019 12:30 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) Type of report: Tube Count - Volume Data LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Valewood Dr and Palazzo Dr QC JOB #: 14799125 SPECIFIC LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Valewood Dr and Palazzo Dr DIRECTION: EB, WB CITY/STATE: Naples, FL DATE: Mar 7 2019 - Mar 7 2019 Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Average Weekday Sat Sun Average Week Start Time Average Week Profile 7 Mar 19 15-min Traffic 15-min Traffic 06:00 PM 900 900 900 C 06:15 PM 776 776 776 C 06:30 PM 938 938 938 C 06:45 PM 738 738 738 07:00 PM 656 656 656 07:15 PM 718 718 718 07:30 PM 674 674 674 07:45 PM 562 562 562 0 08:00 PM 546 546 546 0 08:15 PM 511 511 511 0 08:30 PM 510 510 510 0 08:45 PM 468 468 468 0 09:00 PM 482 482 482 0 09:15 PM 427 427 427 0 09:30 PM 423 423 423 0 09:45 PM 414 414 414 0 10:00 PM 321 321 321 0 10:15 PM 286 286 286 0 10:30 PM 264 264 264 0 10:45 PM 214 214 214 ❑ 11:00 PM 201 201 201 ❑ 11:15 PM 137 137 137 ❑ 11:30 PM 119 119 119 ❑ 11:45 PM 89 89 89 ❑ Day Total 57241 57241 57241 % Weekday 100% Average % Week 100% 100% Average AM Peak 8:00 AM 8:00 AM 8:00 AM 15-min Vol 1055 1055 1055 PM Peak 3:15 PM 3:15 PM 3:15 PM 15-min Vol 1104 1104 1104 Comments: Report generated on 4/1/2019 12:30 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) Type of report: Tube Count - Volume Data LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Valewood Dr and Palazzo Dr QC JOB #: 14799125 SPECIFIC LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Valewood Dr and Palazzo Dr DIRECTION: WB CITY/STATE: Naples, FL DATE: Mar 7 2019 - Mar 7 2019 Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Average Weekday Sat Sun Average Week Start Time Average Week Profile 7 Mar 19 15-min Traffic 15-min Traffic 12:00 AM 24 24 24 0 12:15 AM 24 24 24 12:30 AM 24 24 24 12:45 AM 26 26 26 ❑ 01:00 AM 15 15 15 01:15 AM 25 25 25 0 01:30 AM 14 14 14 0 01:45 AM 12 12 12 0 02:00 AM 27 27 27 ❑ 02:15 AM 18 18 18 02:30 AM 30 30 30 ❑ 02:45 AM 28 28 28 ❑ 03:00 AM 29 29 29 ❑ 03:15 AM 34 34 34 ❑ 03:30 AM 49 49 49 ❑ 03:45 AM 46 46 46 ❑ 04:00 AM 63 63 63 0 04:15 AM 66 66 66 0 04:30 AM 98 98 98 0 04:45 AM 120 120 120 05:00 AM 147 147 147 05:15 AM 220 220 220 05:30 AM 226 226 226 05:45 AM 282 282 282 Day Total Weekday Average Week Average AM Peak 15-min Vol PM Peak 15-min Vol Comments: Report generated on 4/1/2019 12:30 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) Type of report: Tube Count - Volume Data LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Valewood Dr and Palazzo Dr QC JOB #: 14799125 SPECIFIC LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Valewood Dr and Palazzo Dr DIRECTION: WB CITY/STATE: Naples, FL DATE: Mar 7 2019 - Mar 7 2019 Start Time Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri 7 Mar 19 Average Weekday 15-min Traffic Sat Sun Average Week 15-min Traffic Average Week Profile 06:00 AM 447 447 447 C J 06:15 AM 470 470 470 C 06:30 AM 507 507 507 C 06:45 AM 578 578 578 C 07:00 AM 656 656 656 07:15 AM 664 664 664 07:30 AM 627 627 627 07:45 AM 652 652 652 08:00 AM 663 663 663 08:15 AM 627 627 627 08:30 AM 543 543 543 08:45 AM 434 434 434 09:00 AM 508 508 508 09:15 AM 516 516 516 09:30 AM 471 471 471 09:45 AM 469 469 469 10:00 AM 485 485 485 10:15 AM 469 469 469 10:30 AM 501 501 501 10:45 AM 450 450 450 11:00 AM 454 454 454 11:15 AM 494 494 494 11:30 AM 446 446 446 11:45 AM 487 487 487 Day Total Weekday Average Week Average AM Peak 15-min Vol PM Peak 15-min Vol Comments: Report generated on 4/1/2019 12:30 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) Type of report: Tube Count - Volume Data LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Valewood Dr and Palazzo Dr QC JOB #: 14799125 SPECIFIC LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Valewood Dr and Palazzo Dr DIRECTION: WB CITY/STATE: Naples, FL DATE: Mar 7 2019 - Mar 7 2019 Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Average Weekday Sat Sun Average Week Start Time Average Week Profile 7 Mar 19 15-min Traffic 15-min Traffic 12:00 PM 455 455 455 C 12:15 PM 488 488 488 C 12:30 PM 453 453 453 C 12:45 PM 389 389 389 C 01:00 PM 430 430 430 01:15 PM 371 371 371 01:30 PM 479 479 479 01:45 PM 479 479 479 02:00 PM 499 499 499 02:15 PM 538 538 538 02:30 PM 465 465 465 02:45 PM 461 461 461 03:00 PM 464 464 464 03:15 PM 505 505 505 03:30 PM 468 468 468 03:45 PM 442 442 442 04:00 PM 278 278 278 0 04:15 PM 173 173 173 0 04:30 PM 188 188 188 0 04:45 PM 270 270 270 0 05:00 PM 288 288 288 0 05:15 PM 214 214 214 0 05:30 PM 281 281 281 0 05:45 PM 284 284 284 0 Day Total Weekday Average Week Average AM Peak 15-min Vol PM Peak 15-min Vol Comments: Report generated on 4/1/2019 12:30 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) Type of report: Tube Count - Volume Data LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Valewood Dr and Palazzo Dr QC JOB #: 14799125 SPECIFIC LOCATION: Immokalee Rd btwn Valewood Dr and Palazzo Dr DIRECTION: WB CITY/STATE: Naples, FL DATE: Mar 7 2019 - Mar 7 2019 Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Average Weekday Sat Sun Average Week Start Time Average Week Profile 7 Mar 19 15-min Traffic 15-min Traffic 06:00 PM 275 275 275 C 06:15 PM 272 272 272 C 06:30 PM 486 486 486 ] 06:45 PM 345 345 345 0 07:00 PM 253 253 253 0 07:15 PM 270 270 270 0 07:30 PM 247 247 247 0 07:45 PM 192 192 192 0 08:00 PM 169 169 169 08:15 PM 194 194 194 0 08:30 PM 172 172 172 0 08:45 PM 148 148 148 ❑ 09:00 PM 167 167 167 0 09:15 PM 152 152 152 0 09:30 PM 119 119 119 ❑ 09:45 PM 125 125 125 ❑ 10:00 PM 110 110 110 ❑ 10:15 PM 78 78 78 ❑ 10:30 PM 82 82 82 ❑ 10:45 PM 79 79 79 ❑ 11:00 PM 58 58 58 ❑ 11:15 PM 32 32 32 11:30 PM 42 42 42 11:45 PM 18 18 18 Day Total 27712 27712 27712 % Weekday 100% Average % Week 100% 100% Average AM Peak 7:15 AM 7:15 AM 7:15 AM 15-min Vol 664 664 664 PM Peak 2:15 PM 2:15 PM 2:15 PM 15-min Vol 538 538 538 Comments: Report generated on 4/1/2019 12:30 PM SOURCE: Quality Counts, LLC (http://www.qualitycounts.net) Appendix B.2 FDOT Historical AADT FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION TRANSPORTATION STATISTICS OFFICE 2018 HISTORICAL AADT REPORT COUNTY: 03 - COLLIER SITE: 4673 - LIVINGSTON RD/CR 881, N OF IMMOKALEE RD/CR 846 CC 673 YEAR AADT DIRECTION 1 DIRECTION 2 *K FACTOR D FACTOR T FACTOR ---- 2018 ---------- 23000 C ------------ N 11000 ------------ S 12000 --------- 9.00 -------- 56.50 -------- 4.60 2017 22500 T 9.00 56.80 3.80 2016 21500 S N 10500 S 11000 9.00 57.40 4.00 2015 20500 F N 10000 S 10500 9.00 57.20 4.00 2014 19700 C N 9800 S 9900 9.00 56.50 4.00 2013 16400 S N 8000 S 8400 9.00 56.00 4.00 2012 16400 F N 8000 S 8400 9.00 56.20 4.00 2011 16600 C N 8100 S 8500 9.00 56.50 4.00 2010 23000 S N 11500 S 11500 10.32 56.59 4.70 2009 23000 F N 11500 S 11500 11.01 56.34 4.70 2008 24000 C N 12000 S 12000 11.12 56.68 4.70 AADT FLAGS: C = COMPUTED; E = MANUAL ESTIMATE; F = FIRST YEAR ESTIMATE S = SECOND YEAR ESTIMATE; T = THIRD YEAR ESTIMATE; R = FOURTH YEAR ESTIMATE V = FIFTH YEAR ESTIMATE; 6 = SIXTH YEAR ESTIMATE; X = UNKNOWN *K FACTOR: STARTING WITH YEAR 2011 IS STANDARDK, PRIOR YEARS ARE K30 VALUES FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION TRANSPORTATION STATISTICS OFFICE 2018 HISTORICAL AADT REPORT COUNTY: 03 - COLLIER SITE: 4597 - LIVINGSTON RD/CR 881, S OF IMMOKALEE RD/CR 846 CC 597 YEAR AADT DIRECTION 1 DIRECTION 2 *K FACTOR D FACTOR T FACTOR ---- 2018 ---------- 25500 C ------------ N 13000 ------------ S 12500 --------- 9.00 -------- 56.50 -------- 5.40 2017 27000 T 9.00 56.80 3.80 2016 26000 S N 13000 S 13000 9.00 57.40 4.10 2015 25000 F N 12500 S 12500 9.00 57.20 4.10 2014 24000 C N 12000 S 12000 9.00 56.50 4.10 2013 21000 S N 10500 S 10500 9.00 56.00 3.50 2012 21000 F N 10500 S 10500 9.00 56.20 3.50 2011 21000 C N 10500 S 10500 9.00 56.50 3.50 2010 23000 S N 11500 S 11500 10.32 56.59 3.50 2009 23000 F N 11500 S 11500 11.01 56.34 3.50 2008 23500 C N 11500 S 12000 11.12 56.68 3.50 AADT FLAGS: C = COMPUTED; E = MANUAL ESTIMATE; F = FIRST YEAR ESTIMATE S = SECOND YEAR ESTIMATE; T = THIRD YEAR ESTIMATE; R = FOURTH YEAR ESTIMATE V = FIFTH YEAR ESTIMATE; 6 = SIXTH YEAR ESTIMATE; X = UNKNOWN *K FACTOR: STARTING WITH YEAR 2011 IS STANDARDK, PRIOR YEARS ARE K30 VALUES FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION TRANSPORTATION STATISTICS OFFICE 2018 HISTORICAL AADT REPORT COUNTY: 03 - COLLIER SITE: 4567 - CR-846/IMMOKALEE RD, 1100 FT E OF CR-31 YEAR AADT DIRECTION 1 DIRECTION 2 *K FACTOR D FACTOR T FACTOR ---- 2018 ---------- 52000 C ------------ E 26000 ------------ W 26000 --------- 9.00 -------- 56.50 -------- 7.20 2017 58500 S E 29500 W 29000 9.00 56.80 3.30 2016 56500 F E 28500 W 28000 9.00 57.40 3.30 2015 54500 C E 27500 W 27000 9.00 57.20 3.30 2014 52500 C E 26500 W 26000 9.00 56.50 2.80 2013 44500 S E 22500 W 22000 9.00 56.00 3.00 2012 44500 F E 22500 W 22000 9.00 56.20 3.00 2011 45500 C E 23000 W 22500 9.00 56.50 3.00 2010 44000 S E 22000 W 22000 10.32 56.59 2.90 2009 45000 F E 22500 W 22500 11.01 56.34 2.90 2008 46000 C E 23000 W 23000 11.12 56.68 2.90 AADT FLAGS: C = COMPUTED; E = MANUAL ESTIMATE; F = FIRST YEAR ESTIMATE S = SECOND YEAR ESTIMATE; T = THIRD YEAR ESTIMATE; R = FOURTH YEAR ESTIMATE V = FIFTH YEAR ESTIMATE; 6 = SIXTH YEAR ESTIMATE; X = UNKNOWN *K FACTOR: STARTING WITH YEAR 2011 IS STANDARDK, PRIOR YEARS ARE K30 VALUES FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION TRANSPORTATION STATISTICS OFFICE 2018 HISTORICAL AADT REPORT COUNTY: 03 - COLLIER SITE: 7031 - SR93/I-75 NB,OFF-RAMP TO CR846/IMMOKALEE HWY X111 YEAR AADT DIRECTION 1 DIRECTION 2 *K FACTOR D FACTOR T FACTOR -------------- 2018 8800 C ------------ N 8800 ------------ 0 --------- 9.00 -------- 99.90 -------- 9.10 2017 10000 T 0 0 9.00 99.90 6.20 2016 9500 S 0 0 9.00 99.90 6.40 2015 8900 F 0 0 9.00 99.90 4.70 2014 8300 C N 8300 9.00 99.90 5.50 2013 7400 S 0 0 9.00 99.90 3.10 2012 7100 F 0 0 9.00 99.90 2.90 2011 6900 C N 6900 0 9.00 99.90 6.30 2010 5600 S 0 0 9.50 99.99 3.70 2009 5700 F 0 0 10.43 99.99 6.00 2008 5800 C N 5800 0 9.07 99.99 5.10 2007 5600 S 0 0 13.90 2006 5500 F 8.64 99.99 15.50 2005 5400 C N 5400 8.90 99.90 0.00 AADT FLAGS: C = COMPUTED; E = MANUAL ESTIMATE; F = FIRST YEAR ESTIMATE S = SECOND YEAR ESTIMATE; T = THIRD YEAR ESTIMATE; R = FOURTH YEAR ESTIMATE V = FIFTH YEAR ESTIMATE; 6 = SIXTH YEAR ESTIMATE; X = UNKNOWN *K FACTOR: STARTING WITH YEAR 2011 IS STANDARDK, PRIOR YEARS ARE K30 VALUES FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION TRANSPORTATION STATISTICS OFFICE 2018 HISTORICAL AADT REPORT COUNTY: 03 - COLLIER SITE: 7032 - SR93/I-75 SB,ON-RAMP FROM CR846/IMMOKALEE HWY X111 YEAR AADT DIRECTION 1 DIRECTION 2 *K FACTOR D FACTOR T FACTOR ---- 2018 ---------- 8900 C ------------ S 8900 ------------ 0 --------- 9.00 -------- 99.90 -------- 9.10 2017 10500 T 0 0 9.00 99.90 6.20 2016 10000 S 0 0 9.00 99.90 6.40 2015 9500 F 0 0 9.00 99.90 4.70 2014 8900 C S 8900 9.00 99.90 5.50 2013 7900 S 0 0 9.00 99.90 3.10 2012 7500 F 0 0 9.00 99.90 2.90 2011 7300 C S 7300 0 9.00 99.90 6.30 2010 5800 S 0 0 9.50 99.99 3.70 2009 5900 F 0 0 10.43 99.99 6.00 2008 6000 C S 6000 0 9.07 99.99 5.10 2007 5000 S 0 0 13.90 2006 5000 F 8.64 99.99 15.50 2005 4900 C S 4900 8.90 99.90 0.00 AADT FLAGS: C = COMPUTED; E = MANUAL ESTIMATE; F = FIRST YEAR ESTIMATE S = SECOND YEAR ESTIMATE; T = THIRD YEAR ESTIMATE; R = FOURTH YEAR ESTIMATE V = FIFTH YEAR ESTIMATE; 6 = SIXTH YEAR ESTIMATE; X = UNKNOWN *K FACTOR: STARTING WITH YEAR 2011 IS STANDARDK, PRIOR YEARS ARE K30 VALUES FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION TRANSPORTATION STATISTICS OFFICE 2018 HISTORICAL AADT REPORT COUNTY: 03 - COLLIER SITE: 7033 - SR93/I-75 NB,ON-RAMP FROM CR846/IMMOKALEE HWY X111 YEAR AADT DIRECTION 1 DIRECTION 2 *K FACTOR D FACTOR T FACTOR ---- 2018 ---------- 18500 C ------------ N 18500 ------------ 0 --------- 9.00 -------- 99.90 -------- 9.10 2017 20000 T 0 0 9.00 99.90 6.20 2016 19000 S 0 0 9.00 99.90 6.40 2015 18000 F 0 0 9.00 99.90 4.70 2014 17000 C N 17000 9.00 99.90 5.50 2013 15000 S 0 0 9.00 99.90 3.10 2012 14500 F 0 0 9.00 99.90 2.90 2011 14000 C N 14000 0 9.00 99.90 6.30 2010 11500 S 0 0 9.50 99.99 3.70 2009 11500 F 0 0 10.43 99.99 6.00 2008 11500 C N 11500 0 9.07 99.99 5.10 2007 14500 S 0 0 13.90 2006 14500 F 8.64 99.99 15.50 2005 14000 C N 14000 8.90 99.90 0.00 AADT FLAGS: C = COMPUTED; E = MANUAL ESTIMATE; F = FIRST YEAR ESTIMATE S = SECOND YEAR ESTIMATE; T = THIRD YEAR ESTIMATE; R = FOURTH YEAR ESTIMATE V = FIFTH YEAR ESTIMATE; 6 = SIXTH YEAR ESTIMATE; X = UNKNOWN *K FACTOR: STARTING WITH YEAR 2011 IS STANDARDK, PRIOR YEARS ARE K30 VALUES FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION TRANSPORTATION STATISTICS OFFICE 2018 HISTORICAL AADT REPORT COUNTY: 03 - COLLIER SITE: 7034 - SR93/I-75 SB,OFF-RAMP TO CR846/IMMOKALEE HWY X111 YEAR AADT DIRECTION 1 DIRECTION 2 *K FACTOR D FACTOR T FACTOR -------------- 2018 18000 C ------------ S 18000 ------------ 0 --------- 9.00 -------- 99.90 -------- 9.10 2017 19500 T 0 0 9.00 99.90 6.20 2016 18500 S 0 0 9.00 99.90 6.40 2015 17500 F 0 0 9.00 99.90 4.70 2014 16500 C S 16500 9.00 99.90 5.50 2013 14500 S 0 0 9.00 99.90 3.10 2012 14000 F 0 0 9.00 99.90 2.90 2011 13500 C S 13500 0 9.00 99.90 6.30 2010 11500 S 0 0 9.50 99.99 3.70 2009 11500 F 0 0 10.43 99.99 6.00 2008 11500 C S 11500 0 9.07 99.99 5.10 2007 14000 S 0 0 13.90 2006 14000 F 8.64 99.99 15.50 2005 13500 C S 13500 8.90 99.90 0.00 AADT FLAGS: C = COMPUTED; E = MANUAL ESTIMATE; F = FIRST YEAR ESTIMATE S = SECOND YEAR ESTIMATE; T = THIRD YEAR ESTIMATE; R = FOURTH YEAR ESTIMATE V = FIFTH YEAR ESTIMATE; 6 = SIXTH YEAR ESTIMATE; X = UNKNOWN *K FACTOR: STARTING WITH YEAR 2011 IS STANDARDK, PRIOR YEARS ARE K30 VALUES FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION TRANSPORTATION STATISTICS OFFICE 2018 HISTORICAL AADT REPORT COUNTY: 03 - COLLIER SITE: 4125 - OAKES BLVD, 450 FT N OF CR-862/VANDERBILT BCH RD YEAR AADT DIRECTION 1 DIRECTION 2 *K FACTOR D FACTOR T FACTOR ---- 2018 ---------- 7500 C ------------ N 3800 ------------ S 3700 --------- 9.00 -------- 56.50 -------- 7.80 2017 7500 F N 3700 S 3800 9.00 56.80 7.40 2016 7300 C N 3600 S 3700 9.00 57.40 7.50 2015 7100 S N 3600 S 3500 9.00 57.20 4.00 2014 6900 F N 3500 S 3400 9.00 56.50 4.00 2013 6900 C N 3500 S 3400 9.00 56.00 4.00 2012 6500 F 0 0 9.00 56.20 11.00 2011 6600 C N 0 S 0 9.00 56.50 11.70 AADT FLAGS: C = COMPUTED; E = MANUAL ESTIMATE; F = FIRST YEAR ESTIMATE S = SECOND YEAR ESTIMATE; T = THIRD YEAR ESTIMATE; R = FOURTH YEAR ESTIMATE V = FIFTH YEAR ESTIMATE; 6 = SIXTH YEAR ESTIMATE; X = UNKNOWN *K FACTOR: STARTING WITH YEAR 2011 IS STANDARDK, PRIOR YEARS ARE K30 VALUES FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION TRANSPORTATION STATISTICS OFFICE 2018 HISTORICAL AADT REPORT COUNTY: 03 - COLLIER SITE: 0062 - LOGAN BLVD, BTWN VANDERBILT BEACH AND IMMOKALEE RD YEAR AADT DIRECTION 1 DIRECTION 2 *K FACTOR D FACTOR T FACTOR 2018 10700 C N 5400 S 5300 9.00 56.50 4.40 2017 10300 S N 5300 S 5000 9.00 56.80 5.30 2016 9900 F N 5100 S 4800 9.00 57.40 5.30 2015 9500 C N 4900 S 4600 9.00 57.20 5.30 AADT FLAGS: C = COMPUTED; E = MANUAL ESTIMATE; F = FIRST YEAR ESTIMATE S = SECOND YEAR ESTIMATE; T = THIRD YEAR ESTIMATE; R = FOURTH YEAR ESTIMATE V = FIFTH YEAR ESTIMATE; 6 = SIXTH YEAR ESTIMATE; X = UNKNOWN *K FACTOR: STARTING WITH YEAR 2011 IS STANDARDK, PRIOR YEARS ARE K30 VALUES Appendix B.3 Collier County Counts Collier County ADT Traffic Count Report 2014 o `5 U a F Location Q1-2014 Q2-2014 Q3-2014 Q4-2014 613 Q I I Ith Avenue Northeast of Vanderbilt Dr CR 901 11,438 7,375 6,520 8,936 5851 Q I 1 l lth Avenue Northwest of Vanderbilt Dr CR 901 7,601 4,107 4,112 5,157 553 Airport Rd CR 31 north of Davis Blvd SR 84 44,881 37,515 38,102 42,611 501 Airport Rd CR 31 north of Golden Gate Parkway CR 886 37,056 35,796 30,974 33,610 693 Airport Rd CR 31 north of North Road 44,804 41,892 38,798 42,801 599 Airport Rd CR 31 north of Orange Blossom Dr 32,442 31,016 29,599 32,724 503 Airport Rd CR 31 north of Pine Ride Rd CR 896 40,794 36,234 35,132 37,671 543 Airport Rd CR 31 north of Tamiami Trail S 41/SR 90 29,249 26,5681 26,086 31,856 659 Q Airport Rd CR 31 north of Vanderbilt Beach Ext 862 32,006 25,162 24,916 34,284 552 Airport Rd CR 31 south of Davis Blvd SR 84 32,818 31,004 30,425 33,835 533 Airport Rd CR 31 south of Golden Gate Parkway CR 886 41,633 40,111 41,714 43,604 554 Airport Rd CR 31 south of Immokalee Rd CR 846 22,835 21,858 18,363 21,528 502 Airport Rd CR 31 south of Pine Ride Rd CR 896 40,900 39,351 38,864 36,081 521 Q Ba shore Dr north of Week Avenue 11,348 10,293 9,986 10,686 653 Q Bonita Beach Rd CR 865 west of Vanderbilt Dr CR 901 31,951 18,2021 15,374 21,852 626 A Camp Keais Rd south of lmmokalee Rd CR 846 2,617 660 A Capri Blvd CR 952 west of Collier Blvd SR 951 3,401 610 Q Carson Rd north of Lake Trafford Rd CR 890 4,992 4,919 4,962 5,544 618 A Chokoloskee Causeway south of Plantation Parkway 1,797 573 Q Collier Blvd CR 951 north of Davis Blvd SR 84 46,149 43,008 42,505 47,580 584 Q Collier Blvd CR 951 north of Golden Gate Blvd 22,053 21,250 20,136 24,116 525 Q Collier Blvd CR 951 north of Golden Gate P CR 886 27,517 31,004 25,426 27,085 536 Collier Blvd CR 951 north of Pine Ridge Rd CR 896 30,490 31,565 30,009 30,009 602 Collier Blvd CR 951 north of Rattlesnake Ham Rd CR 864 32,311 29,702 27,700 31,061 532 Q Collier Blvd CR 951 north of Tamiami Trail S 41/SR 90 26,611 20,974 21,042 25,356 607 Q Collier Blvd CR 951 south of Golden Gate P CR 886 24,120 23,204 22,501 22,361 655 Q Collier Blvd CR 951 south of Immokalee Rd CR 846 26,224 26,811 25,901 26,507 657 Q Collier Blvd CR 951 south of Lely Cultural Blvd 28,1971 28,521 21,711 29,234 603 Q Collier Blvd CR 951 south of Rattlesnake Ham Rd CR 864 32,168 25,723 24,601 26,663 627 Collier Blvd SR 951 south of Capri Blvd CR 952 29,184 27,083 18,374 25,902 557 Collier Blvd SR 951 south of Tamiami Trail US 41/SR 90 39,380 29,520 25,599 28,176 700 Q Collier Blvd north of Manatee Rd 40,956 29,808 26,113 35,684 520 Q County Barn Rd north of Rattlesnake Ham Rd CR 864 4,897 4,364 3,207 3,722 641 A County Barn Rd south of CC R&B Facility 6,930 519 Q County Barn Rd south of Davis Blvd SR 84 7,532 5,538 4,690 5,734 582 A CR 29 south of Tamiami Trail US 41/SR 90 3,283 619 Q CR 846 east of SR 29 4,115 2,020 2,338 4,023 559 Davis Blvd SR 84 east of Airport Rd CR 31 28,086 22,487 22,484 26,810 658 Davis Blvd SR 84 east of Kin 's Way 31,249 22,767 23,632 27,817 558 Davis Blvd SR 84 west of Airport Rd CR 31 29,811 23,722 23,129 28,442 601 Q Davis Blvd SR 84 west of Collier Blvd CR 951 25,481 15,979 17,861 19,989 560 Q Davis Blvd SR 84 west of Radio Rd CR 856 9,823 10,023 11,857 538 Q Davis Blvd SR 84 west of Santa Barbara Blvd 27,036 22,5811 20,430 22,884 638 A Desoto Blvd north of Golden Gate Blvd 2,005 639 A Desoto Blvd south of Golden Gate Blvd 2,072 635 S I Everglades Blvd north of Oil Well Rd CR 858 6,059 6,019 636 S Everglades Blvd north of Golden Gate Blvd CR 876 5,758 5,273 637 S Everglades Blvd south of Golden Gate Blvd CR 876 6,023 6,199 722 A Golden Gate Blvd CR 876 east of Everl ades Blvd 3,200 652 Q Golden Gate Blvd CR 876 east of Wilson Blvd 15,153 16,915 15,799 16,260 678 Q Golden Gate Blvd CR 876 west of Wilson Blvd 17,4471 18,990 18,033 19,226 531 Q Golden Gate Blvd east of Collier Blvd CR 951 23,724 24,024 23,114 23,884 508 Golden Gate P CR 886 east of Airport Rd CR 31 43,417 40,471 38,019 36,662 691 Q,Golden Gate P CR 886 east of Livin ston Rd CR 881 46,193 46,376 42,698 46,366 605 Q Golden Gate P CR 886 east of Santa Barbara Blvd 27,087 24,675 22,368 25,495 507 Golden Gate P CR 886 west of Airport Rd CR 31 49,684 39,586 41,491 51,611 510 Q Golden Gate P CR 886 west of Collier Blvd CR 951 16,440 15,699 15,009 15,581 530 Q Golden Gate P CR 886 west of Goodlette Rd CR 851 23,146 19,185 16,975 18,733 509 Q Golden Gate P CR 886 west of Santa Barbara Blvd 36,998 30,906 30,978 30,264 505 Q Goodlette Rd CR 851 north of 22nd Avenue North 36,782 31,196 29,984 40,099 595 Goodlette Rd CR 851 north of Orange Blossom Dr 24,914 21,204 20,239 24,479 581 Goodlette Rd CR 851 north of Pine Ridge Rd CR 896 28,302 25,856 25,063 27,373 569 Q Goodlette Rd CR 851 south of First Avenue South 28,315 21,406 21,343 27,797 504 Q Goodlette Rd CR 851 south of Golden Gate P CR 886 39,580 34,693 30,842 37,012 594 Q Goodlette Rd CR 851 south of Immokalee Rd CR 846 15,353 13,668 13,939 16,761 596 Goodlette Rd CR 851 south of Orange Blossom Dr 27,633 19,934 18,788 26,810 506 Goodlette Rd CR 851 south of Pine Ridge Rd CR 896 38,787 35,535 33,548 34,675 642 Q Green Blvd east of Santa Barbara Blvd 9,374 11,135 10,540 10,980 643 Q Green Blvd west of Collier Blvd CR 951 7,731 8,236 8,099 8,255 583 A Gulfshore Dr south of Bayview Dr 4,362 625 Q Immokalee Rd CR 846 east of Goodlette Rd CR 851 44,597 40,608 39,394 47,194 567 Immokalee Rd CR 846 east of Airport Rd CR 31 51,660 45,747 42,376 47,035 593 Q Immokalee Rd CR 846 east of Collier Blvd CR 951 32,531 32,409 30,328 32,032 568 Q Immokalee Rd CR 846 east of I-75 SR 93 39,880 35,076 34,041 36,988 Immokalee Rd CR 846 east of Tamiami Tr(US 41/SR 45 42,342 37,930 35,840 39,389 Page 1 of 3 Collier County ADT Traffic Count Report 2014 o `n U a F Location Q1-2014 Q2-2014 Q3-2014 Q4-2014 6751 Q I Immokalee Rd CR 846 east of Wilson Blvd 27,953 27,9781 26,591 29,763 620 Q Immokalee Rd CR 846 north of Stockade Rd 9,679 8,237 9,454 11,134 671 Q Immokalee Rd CR 846 south of Corkscrew Sanctuary Rd 7,140 5,727 6,139 6,126 586 Q Immokalee Rd CR 846 south of Oil Well Rd CR 858 20,109 17,137 16,702 19,581 656 Q Immokalee Rd CR 846 west of Collier Blvd CR 951 34,264 36,260 31,883 33,701 672 Immokalee Rd CR 846 west of Everglades Blvd. 6,463 4,803 5,442 6,059 679 Q Immokalee Rd CR 846 west of I-75 SR 93 45,994 47,419 45,4781 46,835 565 hmmokalee Rd CR 846 west of Tamiami Tr US 41/SR 45 20,248 15,382 14,1401 18,710 701 Q Immokalee Rd east of Valewood Dr 38,111 35,409 34,927 37,856 684 Q Immokalee Road CR 846 East 3 miles east of 29 South 2,128 752 1,156 2,060 677 Immokalee Road CR 846 east of Everglades Blvd 6,574 5,414 5,907 6,363 674 Q Immokalee Road CR 846 west of Wilson Blvd 28,881 28,810 27,105 27,955 631 J & C Blvd west of Airport Rd CR 31 11,352 11,776 11,505 9,589 614 A Jane's Scenic Dr west of SR 29 664 609 Lake Traffod Rd CR 890 west of Carson Rd 7,682 6,892 7,086 8,585 551 Q Lake Traffod Rd CR 890 west of North 15th St SR 29 11,318 9,882 10,896 12,327 690 Livingston Rd CR 881 1.5 M north of Golden Gate P CR 886 31,621 30,140 28,464 30,052 574 Livingston Rd CR 881 north of Mediterra 16,197 14,059 13,279 15,087 575 Livingston Rd CR 881 north of Pine Ridge Rd CR 896 28,286 25,651 24,798 26,644 687 Livingston Rd CR 881 south of Golden Gate P CR 886 23,088 22,549 22,025 24,127 597 Q Livingston Rd CR 881 south of Immokalee Rd (CR 846) 32,742 30,948 29,833 31,334 5761 Q iLivingston Rd CR 881 south of Vanderbilt Beach Rd CR 862 27,719 27,4571 26,563 27,988 673 Livingston Road CR 881 north of Immokalee Road CR 846 20,726 22,792 22,134 20,403 686 Livingston Road CR 881 north of Radio Road CR 856 30,985 30,964 30,497 27,623 587 Logan Blvd north of Pine Ridge Rd CR 896 10,687 11,527 9,428 11,381 644 Logan Blvd north of Vanderbilt Beach Rd CR 862 8,479 8,275 7,205 8,697 654 Logan Blvd south of Vanderbilt Beach Ext CR 862 9,392 10,570 11,530 10,308 588 Q Logan Blvd/Santa Barbara Blvd south of Pine Ridge Rd CR 896 23,114 25,624 25,169 25,719 6641 Q jMain St SR 29 west of South 1st St CR 846 12,606 8,2231 9,517 11,214 723 S Manatee Rd east of Collier Blvd CR 951 4,660 3,577 513 Q Naples Blvd west of Airport Rd CR 31 18,588 15,905 15,888 16,280 592 Q Naples Blvd west of Cosco Entrance 13,148 11,470 9,445 14,607 612 Q New Market Rd CR 29 A east of Main St SR 29 9,022 6,880 7,547 9,527 550 Q New Market Rd CR 29A west of Broward St 8,411 4,398 4,848 8,921 683 Q North 15th St SR 29 south of Lake Trafford Rd CR 890 15,272 13,025 14,845 15,928 663 North 15th St SR 29 north of Lake Trafford Rd CR 890 11,663 10,246 10,807 12,342 590 Q North First St north of Main St SR 29 7,400 9,512 7,981 8,714 692 North Road west of Airport Road CR 31 2,421 1,872 1,675 1,887 645 Q Oakes Blvd north of Vanderbilt Beach Rd CR 862 7,966 7,892 6,657 8,163 682 Q Oakes Blvd south of Immokalee Rd CR 846 4,330 3,992 3,108 3,552 725 S Oil Well Rd CR 858 east of Bi C ress Elem Sch 6,095 7,716 694 n Oil We 1 R (CR 858) east of Ever ades B vd 2,794 3,290 3,340 4,159 649 Oil Well Rd CR 8585 east of Immokalee Rd CR 846 9,948 8,203 7,989 10,003 547 Old US 41 CR 887 at Lee County Line 17,240 13,805 13,496 17,015 697 Orange Blossom Dr east of Airport Rd 11,800 8,300 7,721 10,142 647 Orange Blossom Dr east of Timberline Dr 12,211 6,875 7,932 10,453 526 Pine Ridge Rd CR 896 east of Airport Rd CR 31 50,820 42,829 43,953 50,693 514 Pine Ridge Rd CR 896 east of Goodlette Rd CR 851 38,360 37,8421 35,953 35,712 628 Pine Ridge Rd CR 896 east of Livingston Rd CR 881 45,913 48,306 46,618 47,634 535 Q Pine Ridge Rd CR 896 east of Logan Blvd/Santa Barbara Blvd 21,236 20,383 19,623 20,427 512 Pine Ridge Rd CR 896 east of Tamiami Trail S 41/SR 45 33,546 29,004 28,746 30,085 515 Q Pine Ride Rd CR 896 west of Airport Rd CR 31 42,869 42,104 40,939 41,324 600 Pine Ride Rd CR 896 west of Logan Blvd/Santa Barbara Blvd 31,162 32,235 32,138 32,616 662 Pine Ride Road east of Whippoorwill Lane 35,566 36,056 34,246 35,615 634 A Plantation Parkway east of CR 29 609 544 Radio Rd CR 856 east of Airport Rd CR 31 17,141 20,439 17,658 19,391 589 Q Radio Rd CR 856 east of Santa Barbara Blvd 13,878 14,030 13,725 13,999 685 Radio Rd CR 856 west of Davis Blvd SR 84 10,098 10,175 10,499 9,835 527 Q Radio Rd CR 856 west of Santa Barbara Blvd 19,182 18,311 17,836 18,532 688 Radio Road CR 856 east of Livin ston Road CR 881 15,7931 14,487 14,2681 14,720 689 Radio Road CR 856 west of Livin ston Road CR 881 13,465 13,458 13,188 14,270 721 A Randall Blvd east of Everglades Blvd(Midway to Desoto Blvd 2,318 651 Q Randall Blvd east of Immokalee Rd CR 846 13,518 11,828 10,981 12,270 516 Q Rattlesnake Ham Rd CR 864 east of Tamiami Tr US 41/SR 90 31,380 30,733 14,554 16,715 5181 Q 1 Rattlesnake Ham Rd CR 864 west of Collier Blvd CR 951 0 9,177 7,880 12,088 517 Q Rattlesnake Ham Rd CR 864 west of County Barn Rd 17,148 13,8001 12,727 13,170 534 Q Rattlesnake Hammock Rd CR 864 east of County Barn Rd 16,384 13,309 12,194 12,976 648 S Sanctuary Rd north of Immokalee Rd (CR 846) 1,033 566 537 Q Santa Barbara Blvd north of Davis Blvd (SR 84) 28,885 24,595 24,174 24,885 529 Q Santa Barbara Blvd north of Golden Gate Pk CR 886) 22,736 19,940 19,997 20,718 606 Q Santa Barbara Blvd north of Radio Rd (CR 856) 25,600 24,315 22,148 26,049 702 Santa Barbara Blvd south of Davis Blvd 9,408 16,002 14,375 16,911 52R n anta Barbara v soul o Golden ate wy 511 Sea ate Dr west of Tamiami Trail (US 41/SR 45) 18,447 17,989 17,367 15,725 7201 S I Shadowlawn Dr north of Davis Blvd SR 84 2,318 1 2,060 Page 2 of 3 Collier County ADT Traffic Count Report 2014 o `n U a F Location Q1-2014 Q2-2014 Q3-2014 Q4-2014 5231 Q I Shadowlawn Dr south of Davis Blvd SR 84 5,035 4,565 3,876 4,409 4dQ n out First t southo am t 665 A SR 29 north of Farm Worker's Village 6,458 591 A SR 29 north of SR 82 6,665 615 A SR 29 north of Tamiami Trail US 41/SR 90 2,660 696 Q SR 29 south of Oil Well Road 3,813 3,079 2,787 3,524 661 A SR 82 west of SR 29 12,721 561 Q,Tamiami Tr US 41/SR 45 south of Pine Ridge Rd CR 896 42,372 38,431 37,601 39,202 563 Q Tamiami Tr US 41/SR 45 south of Vanderbilt Bch Rd CR 862 51,118 44,645 42,114 45,951 572 Q Tamiami Tr US 41/SR 90 east of Rattlesnake Ham Rd CR 864 41,981 39,707 31,055 39,137 546 Q Tamiami Trail US 41/SR 45 at Lee County Line 41,190 32,318 30,499 33,438 564 Q Tamiami Trail US 41/SR 45 north of Immokalee Rd CR 864 60,647 43,129 39,343 54,005 562 Tamiami Trail US 41/SR 45 north of Pine Ridge Rd CR 896 38,514 29,953 27,765 37,384 577 Q Tamiami Trail US 41/SR 45 south of 99th Avenue North 55,231 35,307 34,528 52,444 604 Tamiami Trail US 41/SR 90 east of Airport Rd CR 31 52,232 28,208 27,622 49,376 608 Q Tamiami Trail US 41/SR 90 east of Collier Blvd CR 951 15,307 16,109 15,578 15,334 545 Q Tamiami Trail US 41/SR 90 east of Davis Blvd SR 84 38,272 26,192 25,237 32,638 616 A Tamiami Trail US 41/SR 90 east of SR29/CR 29 4,564 571 Q Tamiami Trail US 41/SR 90 west of Collier Blvd SR 951 31,070 32,613 30,589 32,472 570 Q Tamiami Trail US 41/SR 90 west of San Marco Rd CR 92 7,197 3,831 2,216 3,312 617 A Tamiami Trail US 41/SR 90 west of SR29/CR 29 5,030 698 Thomasson Dr. west of US 41 9,632 9,293 8,879 9,295 524 Q Vanderbilt Bch Rd CR 862 west of Tamiami Tr US 41/SR 45 20,733 16,045 15,657 18,649 646 Q Vanderbilt Beach Ext CR 862 east of Pelican Ride 33,623 27,826 23,305 28,051 579 Vanderbilt Beach Rd CR 862 east of Airport Rd CR 31 28,588 28,686 28,060 29,609 666 Q Vanderbilt Beach Rd CR 862 east of Goodlette Rd CR 851 36,367 29,537 28,329 35,650 630 Vanderbilt Beach Rd CR 862 east of Livingston Rd CR 881 35,215 34,298 32,643 34,067 668 Q Vanderbilt Beach Rd CR 862 east of Vineyards Blvd 29,311 24,971 25,081 28,596 580 Vanderbilt Beach Rd CR 862 west of Collier Blvd CR 951 19,147 19,652 19,297 20,154 667 Q Vanderbilt Beach Rd CR 862 west of Oakes Blvd 30,338 27,654 29,092 35,914 629 Vanderbilt Beach Road CR 862 west of Livin ston Road CR 881 34,012 29,719 27,343 32,363 578 Q Vanderbilt Dr CR 901 north of 111th Avenue North 10,756 6,767 6,012 8,429 633 Q Vanderbilt Dr CR 901 north of Vanderbilt Bch Rd CR 862 7,126 4,947 4,553 5,584 548 Vanderbilt Dr CR 901 north of Wiggins Pass Rd CR 888 11,668 6,619 5,858 8,187 632 Q Vanderbilt Dr CR 901 south of l l lth Ave N 6,019 4,022 3,698 4,641 640 A Vineyards Blvd south of Vanderbilt Beach Rd CR 862 8,057 611 Q Westclock Rd west of North 15th St SR 29 3,174 2,970 3,606 3,889 670 Wiggins Pass Rd CR 888 east of Vanderbilt Dr CR 901 7,589 3,931 3,959 5,310 669 Wiggins Pass Rd CR 888 west of Tamiami Tr S 41/SR 45) 10,919 6,570 6,152 8,725 680 Q Wilson Blvd north of Golden Gate Blvd CR 876 5,994 6,031 5,807 6,056 676 Q Wilson Blvd north of hnmokalee Rd CR 846 1,498 1,623 1,460 1,686 681 Q Wilson Blvd south of Golden Gate Blvd CR 876 348 371 268 348 650 Wilson Blvd south of Immokalee Rd CR 846 6,280 5,809 5,289 6,146 'T: Tvpe of Count A = Annual Count Stations Q = Quarterly Count Stations S = Semi -Annual Count Stations Construction unable to get counts Page 3 of 3 COLLIER COUNTY 2015 TRAFFIC COUNTS o CO U aD >, H Location Q1-2015 Q2-2015 Q3-2015 Q4-2015 613 Q 111th Avenue North east of Vanderbilt Dr (CR 901) 11,164 7,628 6,879 8,633 585 Q 111th Avenue North west of Vanderbilt Dr (CR 901) 6,000 4,106 3,999 4,569 553 Q Airport Rd (CR 31) north of Davis Blvd (SR 84) 47,466 38,761 40,190 46,171 501 Q Airport Rd (CR 31) north of Golden Gate Parkway (CR 886) 37,942 36,633 31,839 32,871 693 Q Airport Rd (CR 31) north of North Road 50,172 50,455 41,535 46,270 599 Q jAirport Rd (CR 31) north of Orange Blossom Dr 43,3511 31,360 29,655 32,742 503 Q Airport Rd (CR 31) north of Pine Ridge Rd (CR 896) 42,236 36,287 35,254 38,260 543 Q Airport Rd (CR 31) north of Tamiami Trail (US 41/SR 90) 29,319 26,617 25,965 31,965 659 Q Airport Rd (CR 31) north of Vanderbilt Beach Ext (862) 37,428 28,703 25,137 34,515 552 Q Airport Rd (CR 31) south of Davis Blvd (SR 84) 35,993 36,215 30,244 33,113 5331 Q jAirport Rd (CR 31) south of Golden Gate Parkway (CR 886) 42,261 39,370 37,335 43,769 554 Q Airport Rd (CR 31) south of Immokalee Rd (CR 846) 22,979 21,538 21,716 21,612 502 Q Airport Rd (CR 31) south of Pine Ridge Rd (CR 896) 27,582 39,351 38,123 36,232 521 Q Bayshore Dr north of Week Avenue 11,402 10,829 9,931 10,876 653 Q Bonita Beach Rd (CR 865) west of Vanderbilt Dr (CR 901) 28,789 15,907 18,515 21,962 626 A Camp Keais Rd south of Immokalee Rd (CR 846) 4,032 660 A Capri Blvd (CR 952) west of Collier Blvd (SR 951) 4,150 610 Q Carson Rd north of Lake Trafford Rd (CR 890) 5,906 4,854 5,385 5,332 618 A Chokoloskee Causeway south of Plantation Parkway 2,186 573 Q Collier Blvd (CR 951) north of Davis Blvd (SR 84) 56,604 42,408 51,074 50,917 584 Q Collier Blvd (CR 951) north of Golden Gate Blvd 25,439 23,608 20,877 22,914 525 Q Collier Blvd (CR 951) north of Golden Gate Pkwy (CR 886) 29,251 36,2151 25,403 27,245 536 Q Collier Blvd (CR 951) north of Pine Ridge Rd (CR 896) 0 0 0 0 602 Q Collier Blvd (CR 951) north of Rattlesnake Ham Rd (CR 864) 38,608 30,655 27,847 31,664 532 Q Collier Blvd (CR 951) north of Tamiami Trail (US 41/SR 90) 26,647 24,695 23,114 25,496 607 Q Collier Blvd (CR 951) south of Golden Gate Pkwy (CR 886) 24,547 22,864 24,097 22,507 6551 Q I Collier Blvd (CR 951) south of Immokalee Rd (CR 846) 28,132 26,865 25,998 26,623 657 Q Collier Blvd (CR 951) south of Lely Cultural Blvd 37,260 34,122 27,852 32,272 603 Q Collier Blvd (CR 951) south of Rattlesnake Ham Rd (CR 864) 35,354 36,304 27,012 29,862 627 Q Collier Blvd (SR 951) south of Capri Blvd (CR 952) 35,689 26,570 23,414 29,664 557 Q Collier Blvd (SR 951) south of Tamiami Trail (US 41/SR 90) 0 0 0 0 700 Q Collier Blvd north of Manatee Rd 0 0 0 0 520 Q County Barn Rd north of Rattlesnake Ham Rd (CR 864) 4,416 4,304 3,240 3,846 641 A County Barn Rd south of CC R&B Facility 7,011 519 Q County Barn Rd south of Davis Blvd (SR 84) 7,292 7,041 3,971 5,847 582 A CR 29 south of Tamiami Trail (US 41/SR 90) 4,150 619 Q CR 846 east of SR 29 4,032 2,883 2,601 2,782 559 Q Davis Blvd (SR 84) east of Airport Rd (CR 31) 32,189 23,279 22,670 26,954 658 Q Davis Blvd (SR 84) east of King's Way 33,969 22,341 23,414 27,918 558 Q Davis Blvd (SR 84) west of Airport Rd (CR 31) 31,847 23,918 24,455 28,570 601 Q Davis Blvd (SR 84) west of Collier Blvd (CR 951) 1 24,815 18,795 19,3641 22,926 560 Q Davis Blvd (SR 84) west of Radio Rd (CR 856) 1 16,394 10,402 12,3811 12,877 Page 1 of 5 COLLIER COUNTY 2015 TRAFFIC COUNTS 538 Q Davis Blvd (SR 84) west of Santa Barbara Blvd 27,947 29,662 21,323 23,599 638 A Desoto Blvd north of Golden Gate Blvd 2,127 639 A Desoto Blvd south of Golden Gate Blvd 2,727 635 S Everglades Blvd north of Oil Well Rd (CR 858) 18,971 6,647 6361 S I Everglades Blvd north of Golden Gate Blvd (CR 876) 5,779 6,111 637 S I Everglades Blvd south of Golden Gate Blvd (CR 876) 6,995 6,403 722 A Golden Gate Blvd (CR 876) east of Everlgades Blvd 3,403 0 652 Q Golden Gate Blvd (CR 876) east of Wilson Blvd 17,268 14,789 17,323 16,028 678 Q Golden Gate Blvd (CR 876) west of Wilson Blvd 19,968 19,459 19,685 19,341 531 Q Golden Gate Blvd east of Collier Blvd (CR 951) 24,914 24,015 22,910 25,272 5081 Q I Golden Gate Pkwy (CR 886) east of Airport Rd (CR 31) 43,427 40,489 38,563 36,952 691 Q I Golden Gate Pkwy (CR 886) east of Livingston Rd (CR 881) 50,7051 46,530 42,741 46,324 605 Q Golden Gate Pkwy (CR 886) east of Santa Barbara Blvd 28,461 25,574 22,486 25,219 507 Q Golden Gate Pkwy (CR 886) west of Airport Rd (CR 31) 53,385 42,955 44,525 53,247 510 Q Golden Gate Pkwy (CR 886) west of Collier Blvd (CR 951) 16,487 17,494 15,322 15,472 530 Q Golden Gate Pkwy (CR 886) west of Goodlette Rd (CR 851) 22,162 24,673 17,077 19,059 5091 Q I Golden Gate Pkwy (CR 886) west of Santa Barbara Blvd 37,064 33,892 31,020 30,528 505 Q Goodlette Rd (CR 851) north of 22nd Avenue North 40,497 41,113 30,952 40,341 595 Q Goodlette Rd (CR 851) north of Orange Blossom Dr 27,284 21,816 20,379 24,627 581 Q Goodlette Rd (CR 851) north of Pine Ridge Rd (CR 896) 29,281 26,207 25,304 27,527 569 Q Goodlette Rd (CR 851) south of First Avenue South 29,504 22,7541 23,608 27,510 504 Q Goodlette Rd (CR 851) south of Golden Gate Pkwy (CR 886) 44,453 37,644 33,247 44,560 594 Q Goodlette Rd (CR 851) south of Immokalee Rd (CR 846) 18,624 14,050 17,213 17,697 596 Q Goodlette Rd (CR 851) south of Orange Blossom Dr 28,598 21,665 18,387 26,963 506 Q Goodlette Rd (CR 851) south of Pine Ridge Rd (CR 896) 39,9911 38,665 33,413 34,818 642 Q Green Blvd east of Santa Barbara Blvd 11,712 10,955 11,727 11,822 6431 Q I Green Blvd west of Collier Blvd (CR 951) 8,543 9,155 8,539 9,773 583 A Gulfshore Dr south of Bayview Dr 4,303 625 Q Immokalee Rd (CR 846) east of Goodlette Rd (CR 851) 49,264 49,479 40,043 43,970 567 Q Immokalee Rd (CR 846) east of Airport Rd (CR 31) 55,909 57,518 44,894 50,799 593 Q Immokalee Rd (CR 846) east of Collier Blvd (CR 951) 38,019 32,8171 30,456 32,179 568 Q Immokalee Rd (CR 846) east of 1-75 (SR 93) 39,024 35,198 34,021 36,979 566 Q Immokalee Rd (CR 846) east of Tamiami Tr (US 41/SR 45) 42,546 38,006 35,878 39,485 675 Q Immokalee Rd (CR 846) east of Wilson Blvd 31,248 31,852 28,971 29,848 620 Q Immokalee Rd (CR 846) north of Stockade Rd 12,425 2,158 10,840 10,918 671 Q Immokalee Rd (CR 846) south of Corkscrew Sanctuary Rd 7,643 5,876 6,892 7,219 5861 Q I Immokalee Rd (CR 846) south of Oil Well Rd (CR 858) 22,346 18,421 16,689 24,050 656 Q Immokalee Rd (CR 846) west of Collier Blvd (CR 951) 39,381 36,345 32,141 33,822 672 Q Immokalee Rd (CR 846) west of Everglades Blvd. 5,862 5,528 6,812 7,143 679 Q Immokalee Rd (CR 846) west of 1-75 (SR 93) 51,596 47,281 45,225 46,928 565 Q Immokalee Rd (CR 846) west of Tamiami Tr (US 41/SR 45) 23,506 15,723 14,452 19,080 701 Q Immokalee Rd east of Valewood Dr 38,276 38,105 34,936 36,969 684 Q Immokalee Road (CR 846 East) 3 miles east of 29 South 1,856 1,216 1,083 1,156 677 Q Immokalee Road (CR 846) east of Everglades Blvd 7,125 6,012 6,567 6,627 674 Q Immokalee Road (CR 846) west of Wilson Blvd 30,132 29,116 27,1981 27,978 631 Q J & C Blvd west of Airport Rd (CR 31) 10,721 11,137 9,5361 10,420 Page 2 of 5 COLLIER COUNTY 2015 TRAFFIC COUNTS 614 A Jane's Scenic Dr west of SR 29 730 609 Q Lake Traffod Rd (CR 890) west of Carson Rd 9,824 7,441 8,435 8,190 551 Q Lake Traffod Rd (CR 890) west of North 15th St (SR 29) 15,153 11,691 12,222 12,240 690 Q Livingston Rd (CR 881) 1.5 M north of Golden Gate Pkwy (CR 29,395 29,957 28,627 30,224 574 Q Livingston Rd (CR 881) north of Mediterra 17,071 14,308 13,377 15,242 575 Q Livingston Rd (CR 881) north of Pine Ridge Rd (CR 896) 27,776 25,801 24,742 26,774 687 Q Livingston Rd (CR 881) south of Golden Gate Pkwy (CR 886) 27,102 27,8141 23,112 24,829 597 Q Livingston Rd (CR 881) south of Immokalee Rd (CR 846) 33,636 30,967 30,440 31,451 576 Q Livingston Rd (CR 881) south of Vanderbilt Beach Rd (CR 862 29,013 27,360 26,354 28,106 673 Q Livingston Road (CR 881) north of Immokalee Road (CR 846) 24,619 22,772 22,199 23,053 686 Q Livingston Road (CR 881) north of Radio Road (CR 856) 32,168 31,042 30,633 28,480 587 Q Logan Blvd north of Pine Ridge Rd (CR 896) 12,839 10,008 11,934 13,616 644 Q Logan Blvd north of Vanderbilt Beach Rd (CR 862 9,918 9,098 10,562 10,393 654 Q Logan Blvd south of Vanderbilt Beach Ext (CR 862) 11,426 10,926 10,601 12,633 588 Q Logan Blvd/Santa Barbara Blvd south of Pine Ridge Rd (CR 8 28,873 24,658 27,404 30,112 664 Q Main St (SR 29) west of South 1st St (CR 846) 12,512 10,674 10,132 10,248 723 S Manatee Rd east of Collier Blvd (CR 951) 5,830 4,090 592 Q Naples Blvd west of Cosco Entrance 12,311 11,410 14,060 13,764 612 Q New Market Rd (CR 29 A) east of Main St (SR 29) 10,7361 7,578 8,447 8,448 550 Q New Market Rd (CR 29A) west of Broward St 8,776 1,969 5,880 5,818 6831 Q I North 15th St (SR 29) south of Lake Trafford Rd (CR 890) 18,971 20,100 15,378 15,167 663 Q North 15th St (SR 29) north of Lake Trafford Rd (CR 890) 14,025 12,470 11,876 11,965 590 Q North First St north of Main St (SR 29) 9,980 8,412 8,645 8,625 692 Q North Road west of Airport Road (CR 31) 2,073 1,904 1,706 1,927 645 Q Oakes Blvd north of Vanderbilt Beach Rd (CR 862) 8,813 7,4101 6,750 8,491 682 Q Oakes Blvd south of Immokalee Rd (CR 846) 4,005 3,509 3,162 4,080 725 S Oil Well Rd (CR 858) east of Big Cypress Elem Sch 11,009 11,093 694 Q Oil Well Rd (CR 858) east of Everglades Blvd 4,928 4,191 4,657 5,005 649 Q Oil Well Rd (CR 8585) east of Immokalee Rd (CR 846) 17,520 7,812 9,517 12,810 547 Q Old US 41 (CR 887) at Lee County Line 17,065 13,876 13,271 16,917 6971 Q I Orange Blossom Dr east of Airport Rd 11,149 8,422 7,822 10,265 647 Q Orange Blossom Dr east of Timberline Dr 11,624 9,424 8,504 10,840 526 Q Pine Ridge Rd (CR 896) east of Airport Rd (CR 31) 53,729 47,694 43,939 50,066 514 Q Pine Ridge Rd (CR 896) east of Goodlette Rd (CR 851) 38,441 37,713 35,484 35,873 628 Q Pine Ridge Rd (CR 896) east of Livingston Rd (CR 881) 54,629 48,361 46,821 47,581 535 Q Pine Ridge Rd (CR 896) east of Logan Blvd/Santa Barbara Blv 21,290 20,293 19,563 20,509 512 Q Pine Ridge Rd (CR 896) east of Tamiami Trail (US 41/SR 45) 33,635 30,129 28,733 30,248 515 Q Pine Ridge Rd (CR 896) west of Airport Rd (CR 31) 42,928 42,254 40,930 41,477 600 Q Pine Ridge Rd (CR 896) west of Logan Blvd/Santa Barbara BK 32,199 32,825 32,345 32,768 662 Q Pine Ridge Road east of Whippoorwill Lane 38,520 36,056 34,000 35,576 634 A Plantation Parkway east of CR 29 550 544 Q Radio Rd (CR 856) east of Airport Rd (CR 31) 21,862 23,025 18,677 20,469 589 Q Radio Rd (CR 856) east of Santa Barbara Blvd 18,431 14,181 13,662 14,207 685 Q Radio Rd (CR 856) west of Davis Blvd (SR 84) 13,378 10,428 11,219 12,620 527 Q Radio Rd (CR 856) west of Santa Barbara Blvd 19,378 18,341 17,930 18,721 688 Q Radio Road (CR 856) east of Livingston Road (CR 881) 16,581 14,582 14,363 14,774 Page 3 of 5 COLLIER COUNTY 2015 TRAFFIC COUNTS 689 Q Radio Road (CR 856) west of Livingston Road (CR 881) 14,789 13,554 12,954 14,349 721 A Randall Blvd east of Everglades Blvd (Midway to Desoto Blvd) 1,876 0 651 Q Randall Blvd east of Immokalee Rd (CR 846) 13,383 11,957 13,148 14,751 516 Q Rattlesnake Ham Rd (CR 864) east of Tamiami Tr (US 41/SR 21,449 22,604 14,639 16,735 5181 Q I Rattlesnake Ham Rd (CR 864) west of Collier Blvd (CR 951) 13,219 10,279 8,145 10,151 517 Q Rattlesnake Ham Rd (CR 864) west of County Barn Rd 18,740 14,295 12,734 13,530 534 Q Rattlesnake Hammock Rd (CR 864) east of County Barn Rd 17,789 13,413 12,279 13,483 648 S Sanctuary Rd north of Immokalee Rd (CR 846) 990 603 537 Q Santa Barbara Blvd north of Davis Blvd (SR 84) 28,961 24,856 24,1291 24,985 529 Q Santa Barbara Blvd north of Golden Gate Pkwy (CR 886) 22,919 19,952 19,653 20,658 606 Q Santa Barbara Blvd north of Radio Rd (CR 856) 29,519 27,139 22,252 26,168 702 Q Santa Barbara Blvd south of Davis Blvd 18,926 20,594 16,410 19,082 528 Q Santa Barbara Blvd south of Golden Gate Pkwy (CR 886) 39,424 38,955 36,945 34,760 511 Q Seagate Dr west of Tamiami Trail (US 41/SR 45) 18,831 18,697 17,866 15,879 720 S Shadowlawn Dr north of Davis Blvd (SR 84) 3,311 2,469 523 Q Shadowlawn Dr south of Davis Blvd (SR 84) 5,209 5,712 4,127 4,514 549 Q South First St (CR 846) south of Main St (SR 29) 17,5201 13,445 15,312 15,432 665 A SR 29 north of Farm Worker's Village 5,563 591 A SR 29 north of SR 82 7,481 615 A SR 29 north of Tamiami Trail (US 41/SR 90) 2,686 696 Q SR 29 south of Oil Well Road 3,658 3,3621 3,402 3,499 661 A SR 82 west of SR 29 15,548 561 Q Tamiami Tr (US 41/SR 45) south of Pine Ridge Rd (CR 896) 42,550 38,482 37,559 39,329 563 Q Tamiami Tr (US 41/SR 45) south of Vanderbilt Bch Rd (CR 86 51,238 44,946 42,227 46,072 572 1 Q ITamiami Tr (US 41/SR 90) east of Rattlesnake Ham Rd (CR 81 44,827 37,216 31,062 39,473 546 Q Tamiami Trail (US 41/SR 45) at Lee County Line 42,394 38,936 31,280 35,055 564 Q Tamiami Trail (US 41/SR 45) north of Immokalee Rd (CR 864) 60,843 44,505 40,181 54,145 562 Q Tamiami Trail (US 41/SR 45) north of Pine Ridge Rd (CR 896) 38,761 31,149 30,929 37,509 577 Q Tamiami Trail (US 41/SR 45) south of 99th Avenue North 54,371 46,760 34,934 52,549 604 Q Tamiami Trail (US 41/SR 90) east of Airport Rd (CR 31) 28,799 46,893 27,936 49,645 608 Q Tamiami Trail (US 41/SR 90) east of Collier Blvd (CR 951) 17,182 16,030 16,114 15,441 545 Q Tamiami Trail (US 41/SR 90) east of Davis Blvd (SR 84) 38,028 26,454 28,449 35,236 616 A Tamiami Trail (US 41/SR 90) east of SR29/CR 29 4,402 571 Q Tamiami Trail (US 41/SR 90) west of Collier Blvd (SR 951) 34,874 32,666 30,649 32,590 5701 Q ITamiami Trail (US 41/SR 90) west of San Marco Rd (CR 92) 6,852 4,020 4,311 4,846 617 A Tamiami Trail (US 41/SR 90) west of SR29/CR 29 4,955 698 Q Thomasson Dr. west of US 41 9,925 9,342 8,871 9,427 524 Q Vanderbilt Bch Rd (CR 862) west of Tamiami Tr (US 41/SR 45 24,392 14,876 13,391 19,102 646 Q Vanderbilt Beach Ext (CR 862) east of Pelican Ridge 35,977 27,010 26,249 32,768 579 Q Vanderbilt Beach Rd (CR 862) east of Airport Rd (CR 31) 31,829 28,661 27,973 29,391 666 Q Vanderbilt Beach Rd (CR 862) east of Goodlette Rd (CR 851) 38,554 30,947 28,007 35,698 630 Q Vanderbilt Beach Rd (CR 862) east of Livingston Rd (CR 881) 35,054 34,026 32,804 33,882 668 Q Vanderbilt Beach Rd (CR 862) east of Vineyards Blvd 32,663 27,399 27,658 33,024 580 Q Vanderbilt Beach Rd (CR 862) west of Collier Blvd (CR 951) 21,314 19,707 19,179 20,255 6671 Q I Vanderbilt Beach Rd (CR 862) west of Oakes Blvd 1 38,034 40,244 32,8481 46,925 6291 Q lVanderbilt Beach Road (CR 862) west of Livingston Road (CR 1 38,018 31,355 27,3221 32,169 Page 4 of 5 COLLIER COUNTY 2015 TRAFFIC COUNTS 578 Q Vanderbilt Dr (CR 901) north of 111th Avenue North 11,376 7,1591 6,318 8,449 633 Q Vanderbilt Dr (CR 901) north of Vanderbilt Bch Rd (CR 862) 7,332 5,243 4,152 5,320 548 Q Vanderbilt Dr (CR 901) north of Wiggins Pass Rd (CR 888) 10,566 6,320 6,255 8,732 632 Q Vanderbilt Dr (CR 901) south of 111th Ave N 6,517 3,752 3,692 4,407 640 1 A lVineyards Blvd south of Vanderbilt Beach Rd (CR 862) 9,190 611 Q lWestclock Rd west of North 15th St (SR 29) 4,235 3,341 3,783 3,852 670 Q Wiggins Pass Rd (CR 888) east of Vanderbilt Dr (CR 901) 7,267 4,043 4,242 5,889 669 Q Wiggins Pass Rd (CR 888) west of Tamiami Tr (US 41/SR 45) 11,319 6,681 6,200 8,652 680 Q Wilson Blvd north of Golden Gate Blvd (CR 876) 6,425 6,224 6,3961 6,015 676 Q Wilson Blvd north of Immokalee Rd (CR 846) 1,577 1,551 1,620 1,553 16811 Q lWilson Blvd south of Golden Gate Blvd (CR 876) 336 305 299 307 16501 Q lWilson Blvd south of Immokalee Rd (CR 846) 5,904 5,529 6,688 7,252 *T: Type of Count A = Annual Count Stations Q = Quarterly Count Stations S = Semi -Annual Count Stations Construction (unable to get counts) Page 5 of 5 COLLIER COUNTY � o CO c U aD >, H Location Q1-2016 Q2-2016 Q3-2016 Q4-2016 613 Q 111th Avenue North east of Vanderbilt Dr (CR 901) 13,256 7,314 6,530 0 585 Q 111th Avenue North west of Vanderbilt Dr (CR 901) 7,412 3,933 3,189 0 553 Q Airport Rd (CR 31) north of Davis Blvd (SR 84) 46,425 39,955 40,186 46,105 501 Q Airport Rd (CR 31) north of Golden Gate Parkway (CR 886) 36,434 36,840 31,422 37,269 6931 Q Airport Rd (CR 31) north of North Road 48,749 49,746 42,363 44,499 599 Q Airport Rd (CR 31) north of Orange Blossom Dr 35,664 31,521 30,348 33,144 503 Q Airport Rd (CR 31) north of Pine Ridge Rd (CR 896) 42,411 36,572 35,313 38,427 543 Q Airport Rd (CR 31) north of Tamiami Trail (US 41/SR 90) 29,548 29,917 26,305 31,734 659 Q Airport Rd (CR 31) north of Vanderbilt Beach Ext (862) 38,105 33,228 25,974 35,304 552 Q Airport Rd (CR 31) south of Davis Blvd (SR 84) 34,703 31,003 30,768 32,451 533 Q Airport Rd (CR 31) south of Golden Gate Parkway (CR 886) 46,401 40,128 41,437 47,907 554 Q Airport Rd (CR 31) south of Immokalee Rd (CR 846) 23,317 22,624 21,598 22,626 502 Q Airport Rd (CR 31) south of Pine Ridge Rd (CR 896) 38,495 38,928 38,011 36,631 521 Q Bayshore Dr north of Week Avenue 11,466 10,899 10,189 11,072 6531 Q I Bonita Beach Rd (CR 865) west of Vanderbilt Dr (CR 901) 34,644 18,457 16,274 20,874 626 A Camp Keais Rd south of Immokalee Rd (CR 846) 4,475 660 A Capri Blvd (CR 952) west of Collier Blvd (SR 951) 4,289 610 Q Carson Rd north of Lake Trafford Rd (CR 890) 5,936 6,201 5,685 5,818 618 A Chokoloskee Causeway south of Plantation Parkway 1,064 573 Q Collier Blvd (CR 951) north of Davis Blvd (SR 84) 56,933 48,244 51,198 52,012 584 Q Collier Blvd (CR 951) north of Golden Gate Blvd 24,653 23,017 20,919 22,937 525 Q Collier Blvd (CR 951) north of Golden Gate Pkwy (CR 886) 29,841 31,003 25,680 28,105 536 Q Collier Blvd (CR 951) north of Pine Ridge Rd (CR 896) 0 0 0 0 602 Q Collier Blvd (CR 951) north of Rattlesnake Ham Rd (CR 864) 28,335 21,845 19,663 31,765 5321 Q lCollier Blvd (CR 951) north of Tamiami Trail (US 41/SR 90) 36,490 28,6761 24,474 27,625 607 Q I Collier Blvd (CR 951) south of Golden Gate Pkwy (CR 886) 24,751 23,086 22,491 22,787 655 Q Collier Blvd (CR 951) south of Immokalee Rd (CR 846) 28,387 28,407 26,988 27,160 657 Q Collier Blvd (CR 951) south of Lely Cultural Blvd 39,030 35,141 28,336 34,038 603 Q Collier Blvd (CR 951) south of Rattlesnake Ham Rd (CR 864) 35,517 35,105 27,792 30,340 627 Q Collier Blvd (SR 951) south of Capri Blvd (CR 952) 34,958 23,915 23,920 30,797 557 Q Collier Blvd (SR 951) south of Tamiami Trail (US 41/SR 90) 0 0 25,863 28,632 700 Q Collier Blvd north of Manatee Rd 0 0 0 0 520 Q County Barn Rd north of Rattlesnake Ham Rd (CR 864) 4,851 4,404 3,248 4,392 641 A County Barn Rd south of CC R&B Facility 7,151 5191 Q I County Barn Rd south of Davis Blvd (SR 84) 7,632 7,069 0 0 582 A CR 29 south of Tamiami Trail (US 41/SR 90) 2,229 619 Q CR 846 east of SR 29 3,905 2,065 2,095 2,782 559 Q Davis Blvd (SR 84) east of Airport Rd (CR 31) 32,526 22,744 22,841 28,055 658 Q Davis Blvd (SR 84) east of King's Way 33,634 24,317 24,868 28,956 558 Q Davis Blvd (SR 84) west of Airport Rd (CR 31) 32,156 24,575 23,478 29,618 601 Q Davis Blvd (SR 84) west of Collier Blvd (CR 951) 26,323 20,640 20,012 23,556 560 Q Davis Blvd (SR 84) west of Radio Rd (CR 856) 14,245 11,925 10,897 13,061 538 Q Davis Blvd (SR 84) west of Santa Barbara Blvd 27,872 26,465 22,031 24,587 3/3/2017 COLLIER COUNTY 638 A Desoto Blvd north of Golden Gate Blvd 2,576 639 A Desoto Blvd south of Golden Gate Blvd 2,531 635 S Everglades Blvd north of Oil Well Rd (CR 858) 6,818 7,196 6361 S Everglades Blvd north of Golden Gate Blvd (CR 876) 6,058 6,084 637 S Everglades Blvd south of Golden Gate Blvd (CR 876) 7,671 7,556 722 A Golden Gate Blvd (CR 876) east of Everlgades Blvd 3,685 652 Q Golden Gate Blvd (CR 876) east of Wilson Blvd 18,091 17,975 0 0 678 Q Golden Gate Blvd (CR 876) west of Wilson Blvd 21,131 20,313 20,117 20,977 531 Q Golden Gate Blvd east of Collier Blvd (CR 951) 25,285 25,7561 25,453 25,770 508 Q Golden Gate Pkwy (CR 886) east of Airport Rd (CR 31) 43,493 40,602 38,577 36,992 691 Q Golden Gate Pkwy (CR 886) east of Livingston Rd (CR 881) 50,794 46,864 43,367 47,144 605 Q Golden Gate Pkwy (CR 886) east of Santa Barbara Blvd 28,658 28,513 23,026 26,045 507 Q Golden Gate Pkwy (CR 886) west of Airport Rd (CR 31) 53,911 43,236 43,944 53,386 510 Q Golden Gate Pkwy (CR 886) west of Collier Blvd (CR 951) 16,586 17,375 15,258 15,595 530 Q Golden Gate Pkwy (CR 886) west of Goodlette Rd (CR 851) 21,729 21,332 18,006 19,478 509 Q Golden Gate Pkwy (CR 886) west of Santa Barbara Blvd 37,155 34,232 31,020 30,553 505 Q Goodlette Rd (CR 851) north of 22nd Avenue North 40,595 40,350 30,952 40,583 595 Q Goodlette Rd (CR 851) north of Orange Blossom Dr 27,561 23,469 20,908 24,619 581 Q Goodlette Rd (CR 851) north of Pine Ridge Rd (CR 896) 29,910 26,839 25,425 27,506 569 Q Goodlette Rd (CR 851) south of First Avenue South 31,239 23,743 25,866 26,852 504 Q Goodlette Rd (CR 851) south of Golden Gate Pkwy (CR 886) 42,859 38,071 34,5561 44,712 594 Q Goodlette Rd (CR 851) south of Immokalee Rd (CR 846) 19,266 15,594 15,545 17,943 596 Q Goodlette Rd (CR 851) south of Orange Blossom Dr 28,890 23,633 19,549 27,565 506 Q Goodlette Rd (CR 851) south of Pine Ridge Rd (CR 896) 40,090 37,652 34,156 34,962 642 Q Green Blvd east of Santa Barbara Blvd 11,874 11,9931 11,884 12,387 643 Q Green Blvd west of Collier Blvd (CR 951) 9,660 10,155 8,799 9,884 583 A Gulfshore Dr south of Bayview Dr 4,761 625 Q Immokalee Rd (CR 846) east of Goodlette Rd (CR 851) 49,492 48,567 42,413 50,488 5671 Q I Immokalee Rd (CR 846) east of Airport Rd (CR 31) 56,316 57,045 36,559 40,275 593 Q Immokalee Rd (CR 846) east of Collier Blvd (CR 951) 38,113 32,910 30,644 32,936 568 Q Immokalee Rd (CR 846) east of 1-75 (SR 93) 39,864 38,185 34,154 37,245 566 Q Immokalee Rd (CR 846) east of Tamiami Tr (US 41/SR 45) 42,966 38,947 36,241 39,939 675 Q Immokalee Rd (CR 846) east of Wilson Blvd 31,710 31,676 29,151 29,862 620 Q Immokalee Rd (CR 846) north of Stockade Rd 12,878 12,974 11,557 12,722 671 Q Immokalee Rd (CR 846) south of Corkscrew Sanctuary Rd 7,931 8,051 7,314 7,462 586 Q Immokalee Rd (CR 846) south of Oil Well Rd (CR 858) 25,413 25,646 23,826 24,968 656 Q Immokalee Rd (CR 846) west of Collier Blvd (CR 951) 39,731 37,135 32,259 34,994 672 Q Immokalee Rd (CR 846) west of Everglades Blvd. 7,065 7,241 6,873 6,881 6791 Q I Immokalee Rd (CR 846) west of I-75 (SR 93) 51,997 48,1101 45,898 47,736 565 Q Immokalee Rd (CR 846) west of Tamiami Tr (US 41/SR 45) 22,803 15,585 14,862 0 684 Q Immokalee Road (CR 846 East) 3 miles east of 29 South 1,781 941 1,012 2,117 677 Q Immokalee Road (CR 846) east of Everglades Blvd 7,594 7,812 7,118 7,053 674 Q Immokalee Road (CR 846) west of Wilson Blvd 30,586 28,609 27,402 28,466 631 Q J & C Blvd west of Airport Rd (CR 31) 10,469 10,087 9,513 10,200 614 A Jane's Scenic Dr west of SR 29 635 609 Q Lake Traffod Rd (CR 890) west of Carson Rd 8,597 8,165 8,602 8,628 551 Q Lake Traffod Rd (CR 890) west of North 15th St (SR 29) 13,489 13,537 13,041 12,994 3/3/2017 COLLIER COUNTY 690 Q Livingston Rd (CR 881) 1.5 M north of Golden Gate Pkwy (CR 29,856 28,9761 28,469 29,935 574 Q Livingston Rd (CR 881) north of Mediterra 17,682 14,710 13,608 15,402 575 Q Livingston Rd (CR 881) north of Pine Ridge Rd (CR 896) 28,041 26,132 24,726 26,973 6871 Q Livingston Rd (CR 881) south of Golden Gate Pkwy (CR 886) 28,408 26,350 24,038 25,182 597 Q Livingston Rd (CR 881) south of Immokalee Rd (CR 846) 33,936 31,068 30,755 32,075 576 Q Livingston Rd (CR 881) south of Vanderbilt Beach Rd (CR 862 29,357 27,777 26,594 28,476 673 Q Livingston Road (CR 881) north of Immokalee Road (CR 846) 25,444 23,045 22,962 23,600 686 Q Livingston Road (CR 881) north of Radio Road (CR 856) 32,593 30,447 29,971 29,938 5871 Q Logan Blvd north of Pine Ridge Rd (CR 896) 14,318 12,785 13,591 15,505 644 Q Logan Blvd north of Vanderbilt Beach Rd (CR 862 10,981 8,712 8,746 11,250 654 Q Logan Blvd south of Vanderbilt Beach Ext (CR 862) 13,409 11,618 12,734 13,520 588 Q Logan Blvd/Santa Barbara Blvd south of Pine Ridge Rd (CR 8 30,661 29,022 30,325 31,648 664 Q Main St (SR 29) west of South 1 st St (CR 846) 12,497 12,353 12,284 12,296 7231 S Manatee Rd east of Collier Blvd (CR 951) 5,637 592 Q Naples Blvd west of Cosco Entrance 13,300 11,781 13,468 13,945 612 Q New Market Rd (CR 29 A) east of Main St (SR 29) 11,353 11,225 8,819 11,949 550 Q New Market Rd (CR 29A) west of Broward St 9,794 9,565 6,206 0 683 Q North 15th St (SR 29) south of Lake Trafford Rd (CR 890) 17,026 17,223 15,785 15,849 6631 Q North 15th St (SR 29) north of Lake Trafford Rd (CR 890) 13,459 13,7891 12,379 12,639 590 Q North First St north of Main St (SR 29) 10,456 10,750 9,065 10,325 692 Q North Road west of Airport Road (CR 31) 2,197 1,898 1,800 2,114 645 Q Oakes Blvd north of Vanderbilt Beach Rd (CR 862) 9,056 7,213 7,499 8,808 682 Q Oakes Blvd south of Immokalee Rd (CR 846) 4,142 3,315 3,371 4,003 725 S Oil Well Rd (CR 858) east of Big Cypress Elem Sch 10,662 13,082 694 Q Oil Well Rd (CR 858) east of Everglades Blvd 5,362 4,421 0 6,248 649 Q Oil Well Rd (CR 8585) east of Immokalee Rd (CR 846) 13,007 10,640 10,455 16,141 547 Q Old US 41 (CR 887) at Lee County Line 18,807 13,749 13,973 17,432 697 Q Orange Blossom Dr east of Airport Rd 11,340 9,137 8,304 10,762 6471 Q Orange Blossom Dr east of Timberline Dr 11,468 9,147 8,7951 11,316 526 Q Pine Ridge Rd (CR 896) east of Airport Rd (CR 31) 50,980 49,172 44,052 50,515 514 Q Pine Ridge Rd (CR 896) east of Goodlette Rd (CR 851) 38,558 37,713 35,717 36,293 628 Q Pine Ridge Rd (CR 896) east of Livingston Rd (CR 881) 55,134 49,584 47,438 48,227 535 Q Pine Ridge Rd (CR 896) east of Logan Blvd/Santa Barbara Blv 21,586 21,9721 19,283 20,907 512 Q Pine Ridge Rd (CR 896) east of Tamiami Trail (US 41/SR 45) 33,714 30,3621 28,957 30,480 515 Q Pine Ridge Rd (CR 896) west of Airport Rd (CR 31) 43,050 42,312 41,0421 41,709 600 Q Pine Ridge Rd (CR 896) west of Logan Blvd/Santa Barbara BK 32,495 32,574 32,379 33,111 662 Q Pine Ridge Road east of Whippoorwill Lane 38,645 36,267 34,480 36,068 634 A Plantation Parkway east of CR 29 465 544 Q Radio Rd (CR 856) east of Airport Rd (CR 31) 21,633 22,254 19,313 20,314 589 Q Radio Rd (CR 856) east of Santa Barbara Blvd 18,786 14,704 14,561 15,849 685 Q Radio Rd (CR 856) west of Davis Blvd (SR 84) 13,553 11,532 11,460 12,727 527 Q Radio Rd (CR 856) west of Santa Barbara Blvd 19,420 18,319 18,029 19,102 688 Q Radio Road (CR 856) east of Livingston Road (CR 881) 17,253 15,088 14,597 15,544 689 Q Radio Road (CR 856) west of Livingston Road (CR 881) 15,245 13,687 13,323 14,662 721 A Randall Blvd east of Everglades Blvd (Midway to Desoto Blvd) 2,321 651 Q Randall Blvd east of Immokalee Rd (CR 846) 14,544 13,088 13,0481 14,897 5161 Q I Rattlesnake Ham Rd (CR 864) east of Tamiami Tr (US 41/SR 22,496 20,453 15,5391 17,435 3/3/2017 COLLIER COUNTY 518 Q Rattlesnake Ham Rd (CR 864) west of Collier Blvd (CR 951) 12,132 7,8261 8,618 11,066 517 Q Rattlesnake Ham Rd (CR 864) west of County Barn Rd 18,845 14,851 13,143 14,192 534 Q Rattlesnake Hammock Rd (CR 864) east of County Barn Rd 18,083 14,173 13,392 13,778 6481 S Sanctuary Rd north of Immokalee Rd (CR 846) 874 603 537 Q Santa Barbara Blvd north of Davis Blvd (SR 84) 29,379 29,248 24,209 27,375 529 Q Santa Barbara Blvd north of Golden Gate Pkwy (CR 886) 23,481 20,606 19,358 21,627 606 Q Santa Barbara Blvd north of Radio Rd (CR 856) 30,323 27,515 22,913 26,748 702 Q Santa Barbara Blvd south of Davis Blvd 22,639 17,688 16,809 17,674 5281 Q I Santa Barbara Blvd south of Golden Gate Pkwy (CR 886) 39,552 39,017 36,949 38,788 511 Q Seagate Dr west of Tamiami Trail (US 41/SR 45) 18,910 18,750 18,142 15,897 720 S Shadowlawn Dr north of Davis Blvd (SR 84) 2,903 2,115 523 Q Shadowlawn Dr south of Davis Blvd (SR 84) 5,340 5,337 4,106 4,461 549 Q South First St (CR 846) south of Main St (SR 29) 17,558 13,973 13,381 16,703 665 A SR 29 north of Farm Worker's Village 7,591 591 A SR 29 north of SR 82 7,815 615 A SR 29 north of Tamiami Trail (US 41/SR 90) 1,988 696 Q SR 29 south of Oil Well Road 4,217 3,491 3,719 4,387 661 A SR 82 west of SR 29 15,438 561 Q Tamiami Tr (US 41/SR 45) south of Pine Ridge Rd (CR 896) 42,944 39,301 37,779 40,033 563 Q Tamiami Tr (US 41/SR 45) south of Vanderbilt Bch Rd (CR 86 51,901 46,754 42,648 46,933 572 Q Tamiami Tr (US 41/SR 90) east of Rattlesnake Ham Rd (CR 8 44,923 37,407 32,728 34,631 546 Q Tamiami Trail (US 41/SR 45) at Lee County Line 42,662 40,044 32,297 35,508 564 Q Tamiami Trail (US 41/SR 45) north of Immokalee Rd (CR 864) 61,177 55,633 40,626 54,863 562 Q Tamiami Trail (US 41/SR 45) north of Pine Ridge Rd (CR 896) 39,096 35,250 31,615 37,871 577 Q Tamiami Trail (US 41/SR 45) south of 99th Avenue North 54,737 47,557 36,296 52,942 604 Q Tamiami Trail (US 41/SR 90) east of Airport Rd (CR 31) 53,629 49,187 29,531 50,251 608 Q Tamiami Trail (US 41/SR 90) east of Collier Blvd (CR 951) 15,446 15,895 28,046 17,330 545 Q Tamiami Trail (US 41/SR 90) east of Davis Blvd (SR 84) 30,240 30,730 31,644 31,364 616 A Tamiami Trail (US 41/SR 90) east of SR29/CR 29 3,067 571 Q Tamiami Trail (US 41/SR 90) west of Collier Blvd (SR 951) 35,364 28,574 33,491 34,616 570 Q Tamiami Trail (US 41/SR 90) west of San Marco Rd (CR 92) 7,144 5,073 4,633 4,711 617 A Tamiami Trail (US 41/SR 90) west of SR29/CR 29 3,073 6981 Q Thomasson Dr. west of US 41 10,236 9,518 9,207 9,764 524 Q Vanderbilt Bch Rd (CR 862) west of Tamiami Tr (US 41/SR 45 25,760 16,656 15,053 18,739 646 Q Vanderbilt Beach Ext (CR 862) east of Pelican Ridge 38,365 28,059 27,535 33,129 579 Q Vanderbilt Beach Rd (CR 862) east of Airport Rd (CR 31) 32,516 29,526 28,198 30,158 666 Q Vanderbilt Beach Rd (CR 862) east of Goodlette Rd (CR 851) 38,801 33,053 29,806 36,963 630 Q Vanderbilt Beach Rd (CR 862) east of Livingston Rd (CR 881) 35,322 34,299 32,470 34,196 668 Q lVanderbilt Beach Rd (CR 862) east of Vineyards Blvd 35,410 29,0561 33,445 34,204 580 Q Vanderbilt Beach Rd (CR 862) west of Collier Blvd (CR 951) 21,579 19,955 19,211 27,526 667 Q Vanderbilt Beach Rd (CR 862) west of Oakes Blvd 41,453 40,183 35,774 40,027 629 Q Vanderbilt Beach Road (CR 862) west of Livingston Road (CR 38,527 32,800 28,070 32,932 578 Q Vanderbilt Dr (CR 901) north of 111th Avenue North 13,045 6,725 6,194 0 633 Q Vanderbilt Dr (CR 901) north of Vanderbilt Bch Rd (CR 862) 7,597 4,496 4,161 0 548 Q Vanderbilt Dr (CR 901) north of Wiggins Pass Rd (CR 888) 12,543 7,173 7,024 0 632 Q lVanderbilt Dr (CR 901) south of 111th Ave N 6,725 3,807 3,638 0 640 A IVineyards Blvd south of Vanderbilt Beach Rd (CR 862) 9,016 3/3/2017 COLLIER COUNTY 2016 TRAFFIC COUNTS 611 Q Westclock Rd west of North 15th St (SR 29) 4,063 4,222 3,849 F 3,919 670 Q Wiggins Pass Rd (CR 888) east of Vanderbilt Dr (CR 901) 8,248 4,682 4,536 669 Q Wiggins Pass Rd (CR 888) west of Tamiami Tr (US 41/SR 45) 11,742 6,397 6,662 6801 Q Wilson Blvd north of Golden Gate Blvd (CR 876) 7,082 6,662 6,573 7,030 676 Q Wilson Blvd north of Immokalee Rd (CR 846) 1,484 1,532 1,525 1,989 681 Q lWilson Blvd south of Golden Gate Blvd (CR 876) 373 391 353 390 650 Q lWilson Blvd south of Immokalee Rd (CR 846) 6,938 6,640 6,431 7,455 *T: Type of Count A = Annual Count Stations Q = Quarterly Count Stations S = Semi -Annual Count Stations ■Construction (unable to get counts) 3/3/2017 Collier County Quarterly Traffic Count Report 2017 O r r Cl) U (D � >' H Location Q1-2017 Q2-2017 Q3-2017 Q4-2017 501 Q Airport Rd (CR 31) north of Golden Gate Parkway (CR 886) 35,432 36,978 46,445 37,612 502 Q Airport Rd (CR 31) south of Pine Ridge Rd (CR 896) 55,021 54,555 40,530 42,378 503 Q Airport Rd (CR 31) north of Pine Ridge Rd (CR 896) 40,739 37,892 34,077 38,733 504 Q Goodlette Rd (CR 851) south of Golden Gate Pkwy (CR 886) 43,422 43,842 34,635 44,712 505 Q Goodlette Rd (CR 851) north of 22nd Avenue North 40,073 38,565 35,360 41,014 506 Q Goodlette Rd (CR 851) south of Pine Ridge Rd (CR 896) 41,072 39,539 34,691 36,583 507 Q Golden Gate Pkwy (CR 886) west of Airport Rd (CR 31) 56,485 45,191 44,548 55,110 508 Q Golden Gate Pkwy (CR 886) east of Airport Rd (CR 31) 43,593 41,025 38,690 37,363 509 Q Golden Gate Pkwy (CR 886) west of Santa Barbara Blvd 37,582 34,593 31,218 32,330 510 Q Golden Gate Pkwy (CR 886) west of Collier Blvd (CR 951) 16,918 17,580 15,346 15,687 511 Q Seagate Dr west of Tamiami Trail (US 41/SR 45) 19,521 18,948 46,445 18,505 512 Q Pine Ridge Rd (CR 896) east of Tamiami Trail (US 41/SR 451,37,035 30,362 29,579 30,480 514 Q Pine Ridge Rd (CR 896) east of Goodlette Rd (CR 851) 39,137 37,778 35,917 18,357 515 Q Pine Ridge Rd (CR 896) west of Airport Rd (CR 31) 52,731 52,976 43,440 44,614 516 Q Rattlesnake Ham Rd (CR 864) east of Tamiami Tr (US 41/SF 22,875 22,291 15,539 17,663 517 Q Rattlesnake Ham Rd (CR 864) west of County Barn Rd 19,449 16,211 13,553 14,607 518 Q I Rattlesnake Ham Rd (CR 864) west of Collier Blvd (CR 951) 12,130 8,734 8,862 12,091 519 Q County Barn Rd south of Davis Blvd (SR 84) 0 0 0 7,816 520 Q County Barn Rd north of Rattlesnake Ham Rd (CR 864) 5,575 3,917 3,633 4,902 521 Q Bayshore Dr north of Week Avenue 11,418 10,975 8,858 10,868 523 Q Shadowlawn Dr south of Davis Blvd (SR 84) 5,244 5,658 4,106 4,461 524 Q Vanderbilt Bch Rd (CR 862) west of Tamiami Tr (US 41/SR 4 26,383 17,575 15,772 19,461 525 Q Collier Blvd (CR 951) north of Golden Gate Pkwy (CR 886) 30,543 27,032 25,835 28,580 526 Q Pine Ridge Rd (CR 896) east of Airport Rd (CR 31) 48,998 48,575 46,445 0 527 Q Radio Rd (CR 856) west of Santa Barbara Blvd 19,849 18,572 17,427 19,754 528 Q Santa Barbara Blvd south of Golden Gate Pkwy (CR 886) 39,918 38,841 35,748 39,176 529 Q Santa Barbara Blvd north of Golden Gate Pkwy (CR 886) 24,131 20,606 18,604 22,054 530 Q Golden Gate Pkwy (CR 886) west of Goodlette Rd (CR 851) 22,372 22,950 18,164 20,026 531 Q Golden Gate Blvd east of Collier Blvd (CR 951) 26,006 26,945 25,520 27,704 532 Q Collier Blvd (CR 951) north of Tamiami Trail (US 41/SR 90) 39,969 38,103 31,140 36,644 533 Q Airport Rd (CR 31) south of Golden Gate Parkway (CR 886) 51,262 42,358 42,865 0 534 Q Rattlesnake Hammock Rd (CR 864) east of County Barn Rd 18,610 14,640 12,042 14,137 535 Q Pine Ridge Rd (CR 896) east of Logan Blvd/Santa Barbara BI 22,289 22,371 20,189 20,189 536 Q Collier Blvd (CR 951) north of Pine Ridge Rd (CR 896) 0 0 0 0 537 Q ISanta Barbara Blvd north of Davis Blvd (SR 84) 30,046 29,608 0 29,310 538 Q Davis Blvd (SR 84) west of Santa Barbara Blvd 28,614 26,465 22,412 25,000 543 Q Airport Rd (CR 31) north of Tamiami Trail (US 41/SR 90) 30,707 30,288 0 30,693 544 Q Radio Rd (CR 856) east of Airport Rd (CR 31) 22,941 23,670 19,746 20,666 545 Q Tamiami Trail (US 41/SR 90) east of Davis Blvd (SR 84) 30,934 34,625 0 0 546 Q Tamiami Trail (US 41/SR 45) at Lee County Line 47,514 46,461 35,087 37,186 547 Q 1 Old US 41 (CR 887) at Lee County Line 19,125 14,615 14,524 18,173 548 Q IVanderbilt Dr (CR 901) north of Wiggins Pass Rd (CR 888) 0 0 0 0 549 Q South First St (CR 846) south of Main St (SR 29) 16,388 16,738 0 0 550 Q New Market Rd (CR 29A) west of Broward St 9,872 9,755 0 0 551 Q Lake Traffod Rd (CR 890) west of North 15th St (SR 29) 14,348 14,038 0 0 552 Q Airport Rd (CR 31) south of Davis Blvd (SR 84) 36,346 36,813 31,407 32,906 553 Q Airport Rd (CR 31) north of Davis Blvd (SR 84) 48,001 39,754 0 45,397 554 Q jAirport Rd (CR 31) south of Immokalee Rd (CR 846) 23,973 22,672 22,355 23,984 557 Q ICollier Blvd (SR 951) south of Tamiami Trail (US 41/SR 90) 30,286 29,761 26,721 29,178 558 Q I Davis Blvd (SR 84) west of Airport Rd (CR 31) 33,066 23,783 0 28,235 559 Q I Davis Blvd (SR 84) east of Airport Rd (CR 31) 31,311 22,954 0 28,295 560 Q I Davis Blvd (SR 84) west of Radio Rd (CR 856) 17,555 10,847 0 14,747 561 Q Tamiami Tr (US 41/SR 45) south of Pine Ridge Rd (CR 896) 43,575 40,343 38,523 40,475 562 Q Tamiami Trail (US 41/SR 45) north of Pine Ridge Rd (CR 89E 39,815 36,009 31,985 38,173 563 Q Tamiami Tr (US 41/SR 45) south of Vanderbilt Bch Rd (CR 81 52,516 47,684 42,827 47,251 564 Q Tamiami Trail (US 41/SR 45) north of Immokalee Rd (CR 86z 55,322 51,430 43,689 50,825 565 Q Immokalee Rd (CR 846) west of Tamiami Tr (US 41/SR 45) 0 0 0 0 566 Q Immokalee Rd (CR 846) east of Tamiami Tr (US 41/SR 45) 50,151 47,686 37,174 41,131 567 Q Immokalee Rd (CR 846) east of Airport Rd (CR 31) 61,936 59,380 46,265 50,659 568 Q Immokalee Rd (CR 846) east of I-75 (SR 93) 40,935 39,375 34,809 37,346 569 Q Goodlette Rd (CR 851) south of First Avenue South 29,484 29,360 0 27,861 570 Q Tamiami Trail (US 41/SR 90) west of San Marco Rd (CR 92) 4,630 4,458 0 5,314 571 Q Tamiami Trail (US 41/SR 90) west of Collier Blvd (SR 951) 0 29,636 29,712 43,915 572 Q Tamiami Tr (US 41/SR 90) east of Rattlesnake Ham Rd (CR 43,950 30,572 33,949 35,428 573 Q Collier Blvd (CR 951) north of Davis Blvd (SR 84) 56,723 56,792 0 56,880 574 Q I Livingston Rd CR 881 north of Mediterra 23,760 20,245 14,712 21,128 575 Q Livingston Rd CR 881 north of Pine Ridge Rd CR 896 28,766 26,846 25,062 27,091 576 Q Livingston Rd CR 881 south of Vanderbilt Beach Rd CR 86 29,993 28,1231 27,032 28,400 577 Q Tamiami Trail (US 41/SR 45) south of 99th Avenue North 1 55,4551 26,9491 34,7251 37,796 5/1 /2018 Collier County Quarterly Traffic Count Report 2017 O r r Cl) U (D � >, H Location Q1-2017 Q2-2017 Q3-2017 Q4-2017 578 Q Vanderbilt Dr (CR 901) north of 111th Avenue North 0 0 0 0 579 Q Vanderbilt Beach Rd (CR 862) east of Airport Rd (CR 31) 33,263 30,412 28,961 30,461 580 Q Vanderbilt Beach Rd (CR 862) west of Collier Blvd (CR 951) 28,539 29,992 19,933 27,762 581 Q Goodlette Rd (CR 851) north of Pine Ridge Rd (CR 896) 30,573 27,412 25,953 27,999 582 A CR 29 south of Tamiami Trail (US 41/SR 90) 4,393 0 0 0 583 A Gulfshore Dr south of Bayview Dr 0 0 0 0 584 Q Collier Blvd (CR 951) north of Golden Gate Blvd 24,064 25,147 21,198 23,091 585 Q 111 th Avenue North west of Vanderbilt Dr (CR 901) 0 0 0 0 586 Q Immokalee Rd (CR 846) south of Oil Well Rd (CR 858) 26,744 21,445 0 29,444 587 Q Logan Blvd north of Pine Ridge Rd (CR 896) 14,950 13,144 12,640 12,577 588 Q ILogan Blvd/Santa Barbara Blvd south of Pine Ridge Rd (CR E 32,289 29,192 30,138 30,109 589 Q I Radio Rd (CR 856) east of Santa Barbara Blvd 19,544 15,759 14,999 16,372 590 Q I North First St north of Main St (SR 29) 10,767 10,332 0 0 591 A I SR 29 north of SR 82 7,671 0 0 0 592 Q Naples Blvd west of Cosco Entrance 14,972 10,647 0 14,237 593 Q Immokalee Rd (CR 846) east of Collier Blvd (CR 951) 38,988 36,189 31,592 33,828 594 Q IGoodlette Rd (CR 851) south of Immokalee Rd (CR 846) 20,533 15,415 15,204 18,441 595 Q IGoodlette Rd (CR 851) north of Orange Blossom Dr 28,498 24,911 21,776 25,895 596 Q I Goodlette Rd (CR 851) south of Orange Blossom Dr 29,872 25,155 23,087 27,861 597 Q I Livingston Rd (CR 881) south of Immokalee Rd (CR 846) 34,662 31,694 28,457 32,501 599 Q jAirport Rd (CR 31) north of Orange Blossom Dr 40,953 33,371 30,399 35,086 600 Q Pine Ridge Rd (CR 896) west of Logan Blvd/Santa Barbara B 33,211 37,876 35,779 32,912 601 Q Davis Blvd (SR 84) west of Collier Blvd (CR 951) 26,133 21,205 0 25,874 602 Q Collier Blvd (CR 951) north of Rattlesnake Ham Rd (CR 864) 35,886 38,464 27,800 29,563 603 Q Collier Blvd (CR 951) south of Rattlesnake Ham Rd (CR 864) 42,200 40,455 28,975 31,503 604 Q Tamiami Trail (US 41/SR 90) east of Airport Rd (CR 31) 53,782 54,033 34,816 50,501 605 Q Golden Gate Pkwy (CR 886) east of Santa Barbara Blvd 29,219 28,070 23,607 27,134 606 Q Santa Barbara Blvd north of Radio Rd (CR 856) 30,886 28,114 27,090 28,993 607 Q Collier Blvd (CR 951) south of Golden Gate Pkwy (CR 886) 25,225 23,098 22,880 23,168 608 Q Tamiami Trail (US 41/SR 90) east of Collier Blvd (CR 951) 17,820 18,131 14,814 32,891 609 Q Lake Traffod Rd (CR 890) west of Carson Rd 9,360 8,978 0 0 610 Q Carson Rd north of Lake Trafford Rd (CR 890) 6,218 6,012 0 0 611 Q Westclock Rd west of North 15th St (SR 29) 3,999 4,134 0 0 612 Q New Market Rd (CR 29 A) east of Main St (SR 29) 11,318 11,102 0 0 613 Q 111th Avenue North east of Vanderbilt Dr (CR 901) 0 0 0 0 614 A Jane's Scenic Dr west of SR 29 943 0 0 0 615 A SR 29 north of Tamiami Trail (US 41/SR 90) 3,197 0 0 0 616 A Tamiami Trail (US 41/SR 90) east of SR29/CR 29 4,951 29,636 0 0 617 A Tamiami Trail (US 41/SR 90) west of SR29/CR 29 5,637 0 0 0 618 A Chokoloskee Causeway south of Plantation Parkway 2,120 0 0 0 619 Q CR 846 east of SR 29 4,016 3,774 0 0 620 Q Immokalee Rd (CR 846) north of Stockade Rd 12,437 12,209 0 0 625 Q I Immokalee Rd (CR 846) east of Goodlette Rd (CR 851) 55,092 53,777 42,820 51,209 626 A Camp Keais Rd south of Immokalee Rd (CR 846) 4,404 0 0 0 627 Q Collier Blvd (SR 951) south of Capri Blvd (CR 952) 35,370 25,489 25,694 29,766 628 Q Pine Ridge Rd (CR 896) east of Livingston Rd (CR 881) 55,946 55,158 47,732 48,878 629 Q Vanderbilt Beach Road (CR 862) west of Livingston Road (CF 39,196 33,226 29,226 33,543 630 Q Vanderbilt Beach Rd (CR 862) east of Livingston Rd (CR 881 35,980 34,514 32,861 34,400 631 Q IJ & C Blvd west of Airport Rd (CR 31) 10,807 10,951 9,666 10,150 632 Q IVanderbilt Dr (CR 901) south of 111th Ave N 0 0 0 0 633 Q IVanderbilt Dr (CR 901) north of Vanderbilt Bch Rd (CR 862) 5,546 0 0 0 634 A I Plantation Parkway east of CR 29 517 0 0 0 635 S I Everglades Blvd north of Oil Well Rd (CR 858) 7,312 0 0 0 636 S I Everglades Blvd north of Golden Gate Blvd (CR 876) 6,390 0 6,084 0 637 S I Everglades Blvd south of Golden Gate Blvd (CR 876) 7,727 0 7,556 0 638 A IDesoto Blvd north of Golden Gate Blvd 2,520 0 0 0 639 A IDesoto Blvd south of Golden Gate Blvd 2,675 0 0 0 640 A IVineyards Blvd south of Vanderbilt Beach Rd (CR 862) 9,494 0 0 0 641 A County Barn Rd south of CC R&B Facility 7,247 0 0 0 642 Q Green Blvd east of Santa Barbara Blvd 12,039 11,430 11,750 12,299 643 Q Green Blvd west of Collier Blvd (CR 951) 10,063 10,227 8,729 9,802 644 Q Logan Blvd north of Vanderbilt Beach Rd (CR 862 11,480 9,827 0 11,005 645 Q Oakes Blvd north of Vanderbilt Beach Rd (CR 862) 9,571 7,297 0 9,263 646 Q Vanderbilt Beach Ext (CR 862) east of Pelican Ridge 39,140 28,088 27,603 32,889 647 Q Orange Blossom Dr east of Timberline Dr 8,558 8,832 6,511 8,484 648 S Sanctuary Rd north of Immokalee Rd (CR 846) 720 0 0 0 649 Q Oil Well Rd CR 8585 east of Immokalee Rd CR 846 15,594 12,411 12,393 17,244 650 Q Wilson Blvd south of Immokalee Rd (CR 846) 7,512 6,838 0 8,507 651 Q I Randall Blvd east of Immokalee Rd (CR 846) 15,3701 12,999 0 14,449 5/1 /2018 Collier County Quarterly Traffic Count Report 2017 O r r Cl) U (D � >, H Location Q1-2017 Q2-2017 Q3-2017 Q4-2017 652 Q Golden Gate Blvd (CR 876) east of Wilson Blvd 0 0 0 20,318 653 Q Bonita Beach Rd (CR 865) west of Vanderbilt Dr (CR 901) 32,463 18,778 18,430 22,638 654 Q Logan Blvd south of Vanderbilt Beach Ext (CR 862) 13,743 12,031 12,145 11,962 655 Q Collier Blvd (CR 951) south of Immokalee Rd (CR 846) 30,434 31,525 25,870 27,249 656 Q Immokalee Rd (CR 846) west of Collier Blvd (CR 951) 40,342 38,0651 32,879 35,194 657 Q Collier Blvd (CR 951) south of Lely Cultural Blvd 39,006 30,392 31,476 0 658 Q Davis Blvd (SR 84) east of King's Way 32,847 24,104 0 29,281 659 Q jAirport Rd (CR 31) north of Vanderbilt Beach Ext (862) 38,727 34,363 28,115 36,408 660 A I Capri Blvd (CR 952) west of Collier Blvd (SR 951) 4,486 0 0 0 661 A SR 82 west of SR 29 15,295 0 0 0 662 Q Pine Ridge Road east of Whippoorwill Lane 39,282 36,972 34,684 36,293 663 Q North 15th St (SR 29) north of Lake Trafford Rd (CR 890) 13,537 13,871 0 0 664 Q Main St (SR 29) west of South 1st St (CR 846) 12,181 12,669 0 0 665 A SR 29 north of Farm Worker's Village 8,027 0 0 0 666 Q IVanderbilt Beach Rd (CR 862) east of Goodlette Rd (CR 851 39,4491 34,636 30,250 37,301 667 Q Vanderbilt Beach Rd (CR 862) west of Oakes Blvd 42,909 34,572 33,838 45,477 668 Q Vanderbilt Beach Rd (CR 862) east of Vineyards Blvd 37,945 30,340 29,699 36,710 669 Q Wiggins Pass Rd (CR 888) west of Tamiami Tr (US 41/SR 4E 0 0 0 0 670 Q Wiggins Pass Rd (CR 888) east of Vanderbilt Dr (CR 901) 0 0 0 0 671 Q Immokalee Rd (CR 846) south of Corkscrew Sanctuary Rd 7,814 7,757 0 0 672 Q Immokalee Rd (CR 846) west of Everglades Blvd. 7,065 6,935 0 0 673 Q Livingston Road (CR 881) north of Immokalee Road (CR 846 25,929 23,659 22,792 24,499 674 Q Immokalee Road (CR 846) west of Wilson Blvd 31,231 28,911 28,072 28,682 675 Q Immokalee Rd (CR 846) east of Wilson Blvd 41,135 40,734 29,706 30,513 676 Q lWilson Blvd north of Immokalee Rd (CR 846) 1,838 1,614 0 1,872 677 Q Immokalee Road (CR 846) east of Everglades Blvd 7,625 7,408 0 0 678 Q Golden Gate Blvd (CR 876) west of Wilson Blvd 21,167 21,889 0 22,715 679 Q Immokalee Rd (CR 846) west of 1-75 (SR 93) 53,258 48,684 45,408 48,624 680 Q lWilson Blvd north of Golden Gate Blvd (CR 876) 7,267 6,726 7,975 7,669 681 Q lWilson Blvd south of Golden Gate Blvd (CR 876) 381 375 0 339 682 Q 10akes Blvd south of Immokalee Rd (CR 846) 4,235 3,080 0 4,028 683 Q North 15th St (SR 29) south of Lake Trafford Rd (CR 890) 16,833 17,324 0 0 684 Q Immokalee Road (CR 846 East) 3 miles east of 29 South 2,963 3,026 0 0 685 Q Radio Rd (CR 856) west of Davis Blvd (SR 84) 13,870 14,134 0 12,396 686 Q Livingston Road (CR 881) north of Radio Road (CR 856) 21,237 21,904 17,947 20,270 687 Q Livingston Rd (CR 881) south of Golden Gate Pkwy (CR 886) 28,611 29,462 24,236 25,188 688 Q Radio Road (CR 856) east of Livingston Road (CR 881) 17,766 15,480 14,907 15,837 689 Q Radio Road (CR 856) west of Livingston Road (CR 881) 16,462 14,334 13,382 15,923 690 Q Livingston Rd (CR 881) 1.5 M north of Golden Gate Pkwy (CF 30,517 29,317 28,395 29,522 691 Q Golden Gate Pkwy (CR 886) east of Livingston Rd (CR 881) 51,477 46,296 44,823 38,186 692 Q North Road west of Airport Road (CR 31) 2,836 2,556 1,674 2,210 693 Q jAirport Rd (CR 31) north of North Road 51,456 51,903 42,837 45,460 694 Q Oil Well Rd (CR 858) east of Everglades Blvd 6,318 6,137 0 7,779 695 North 15th Street (SR 29) south of SR 82 20,309 18,064 18,409 696 Q SR 29 south of Oil Well Road 4,171 3,990 41152 0 697 Q Orange Blossom Dr east of Airport Rd 11,830 10,759 8,997 10,917 698 Q IThomasson Dr. west of US 41 10,936 11,516 8,902 9,771 702 Q ISanta Barbara Blvd south of Davis Blvd 20,997 22,610 16,307 17,625 720 S Shadowlawn Dr north of Davis Blvd (SR 84) 3,112 0 0 0 721 A Randall Blvd east of Everglades Blvd (Midway to Desoto Blvd 2,508 0 0 0 722 A Golden Gate Blvd (CR 876) east of Everlgades Blvd 3,690 0 0 0 723 S Manatee Rd east of Collier Blvd (CR 951) 5,804 0 3,816 0 725 S Oil Well Rd (CR 858) east of Corkscrew Middle/Elem Sch 14,140 0 0 0 A = Annual Count Stations Q = Quarterly Count Stations S = Semi -Annual Count Stations Construction (unable to get counts) Hurricane Irma unable to get counts 5/1 /2018 Collier County Quarterly Traffic Counts Report 2018 o w U a� H Location Q1-2018* Q2-2018* Q3-2018* Q4-2018* 613 Q 111th Avenue North east of Vanderbilt Dr (CR 901) 585 Q 111th Avenue North west of Vanderbilt Dr (CR 901) 553 Q Airport Rd (CR 31) north of Davis Blvd (SR 84) 44,997 40,775 40,389 46,990 501 Q Airport Rd (CR 31) north of Golden Gate Parkway (CR 886) 35,811 37,179 32,072 33,463 693 Q Airport Rd (CR 31) north of North Road 51,984 52,490 44,637 46,802 599 Q Airport Rd (CR 31) north of Orange Blossom Dr 41,627 35,810 35,917 38,170 503 Q jAirport Rd (CR 31) north of Pine Ridge Rd (CR 896) 40,069 40,245 34,454 52,058 543 Q jAirport Rd (CR 31) north of Tamiami Trail (US 41/SR 90) 30,850 30,433 26,510 31,136 659 Q jAirport Rd (CR 31) north of Vanderbilt Beach Ext (862) 37,601 35,172 28,648 36,758 552 Q jAirport Rd (CR 31) south of Davis Blvd (SR 84) 36,789 37,213 31,776 33,389 533 Q jAirport Rd (CR 31) south of Golden Gate Parkway (CR 886) 48,993 41,782 41,961 47,326 554 Q jAirport Rd (CR 31) south of Immokalee Rd (CR 846) 24,828 23,062 22,492 24,461 502 Q jAirport Rd (CR 31) south of Pine Ridge Rd (CR 896) 55,682 56,055 41,072 49,364 521 Q I Bayshore Dr north of Week Avenue 12,497 12,450 9,316 10,024 653 Q Bonita Beach Rd (CR 865) west of Vanderbilt Dr (CR 901) 28,008 18,589 17,432 20,764 626 A Camp Keais Rd south of Immokalee Rd (CR 846) 5,490 660 A Capri Blvd (CR 952) west of Collier Blvd (SR 951) 4,486 610 Q Carson Rd north of Lake Trafford Rd (CR 890) 6,338 5,027 5,071 6,472 618 A Chokoloskee Causeway south of Plantation Parkway 1,866 573 Q Collier Blvd (CR 951) north of Davis Blvd (SR 84) 57,687 52,780 53,139 55,731 584 Q ICollier Blvd (CR 951) north of Golden Gate Blvd 24,605 25,841 21,401 28,670 525 Q ICollier Blvd (CR 951) north of Golden Gate Pkwy (CR 886) 31,019 27,559 25,950 24,819 536 Q ICollier Blvd (CR 951) north of Pine Ridge Rd (CR 896) 33,386 30,936 30,350 33,556 602 Q ICollier Blvd (CR 951) north of Rattlesnake Ham Rd (CR 864) 36,562 38,775 28,222 32,891 532 Q ICollier Blvd (CR 951) north of Tamiami Trail (US 41/SR 90) 40,377 38,863 31,993 31,852 607 Q ICollier Blvd (CR 951) south of Golden Gate Pkwy (CR 886) 25,856 23,430 23,164 29,321 655 Q ICollier Blvd (CR 951) south of Immokalee Rd (CR 846) 30,943 31,740 30,715 32,161 657 Q ICollier Blvd (CR 951) south of Lely Cultural Blvd 38,134 603 Q ICollier Blvd (CR 951) south of Rattlesnake Ham Rd (CR 864) 42,789 40,956 29,620 35,387 627 Q ICollier Blvd (SR 951) south of Capri Blvd (CR 952) 37,296 28,420 25,305 31,179 557 Q ICollier Blvd (SR 951) south of Tamiami Trail (US 41/SR 90) 30,968 30,292 27,165 29,581 520 Q ICounty Barn Rd north of Rattlesnake Ham Rd (CR 864) 6,756 4,926 4,702 4,667 641 A ICounty Barn Rd south of CC R&B Facility 8,747 519 Q County Barn Rd south of Davis Blvd (SR 84) 8,070 7,383 6,501 8,047 582 A CR 29 south of Tamiami Trail (US 41/SR 90) 3,673 619 Q CR 846 east of SR 29 4,646 2,179 2,209 4,076 559 Q Davis Blvd (SR 84) east of Airport Rd (CR 31) 31,294 22,850 22,803 27,045 658 Q Davis Blvd (SR 84) east of King's Way 33,040 29,842 558 Q I Davis Blvd (SR 84) west of Airport Rd (CR 31) 35,134 24,034 23,946 33,376 601 Q I Davis Blvd (SR 84) west of Collier Blvd (CR 951) 25,998 23,970 25,336 24,800 560 Q Davis Blvd (SR 84) west of Radio Rd (CR 856) 16,494 12,178 12,674 16,347 538 Q Davis Blvd (SR 84) west of Santa Barbara Blvd 29,149 26,848 22,869 23,907 638 A Desoto Blvd north of Golden Gate Blvd 2,805 639 A Desoto Blvd south of Golden Gate Blvd 3,015 635 S Everglades Blvd north of Oil Well Rd (CR 858) 7,232 8,623 636 S Everglades Blvd north of Golden Gate Blvd (CR 876) 6,360 7,502 637 S lEverglades Blvd south of Golden Gate Blvd (CR 876) 7,608 8,453 722 A IGolden Gate Blvd (CR 876) east of Everlgades Blvd 4,330 652 Q IGolden Gate Blvd (CR 876) east of Wilson Blvd 21,713 21,423 20,770 22,183 678 Q IGolden Gate Blvd (CR 876) west of Wilson Blvd 23,311 22,555 23,371 531 Q IGolden Gate Blvd east of Collier Blvd (CR 951) 27,235 27,019 28,368 508 Q Golden Gate Pkwy (CR 886) east of Airport Rd (CR 31) 44,271 41,570 45,634 46,133 691 Q Golden Gate Pkwy (CR 886) east of Livingston Rd (CR 881) 52,154 46,872 45,250 49,219 605 Q Golden Gate Pkwy (CR 886) east of Santa Barbara Blvd 29,764 28,503 24,190 36,097 507 Q Golden Gate Pkwy (CR 886) west of Airport Rd (CR 31) 59,603 45,263 44,453 51,789 510 Q Golden Gate Pkwy (CR 886) west of Collier Blvd (CR 951) 17,580 18,747 18,364 18,282 530 Q I Golden Gate Pkwy (CR 886) west of Goodlette Rd (CR 851) 23,075 23,780 18,893 19,892 509 Q I Golden Gate Pkwy (CR 886) west of Santa Barbara Blvd 38,053 34,991 31,851 49,935 505 Q IGoodlette Rd (CR 851) north of 22nd Avenue North 40,558 38,565 31,271 31,924 595 Q IGoodlette Rd (CR 851) north of Orange Blossom Dr 29,110 25,363 22,527 26,230 581 Q I Goodlette Rd (CR 851) north of Pine Ridge Rd (CR 896) 31,076 27,669 26,184 28,386 569 Q Goodlette Rd (CR 851) south of First Avenue South 32,277 23,479 23,893 28,994 504 Q Goodlette Rd (CR 851) south of Golden Gate Pkwy (CR 886) 44,395 33,820 34,183 40,468 594 Q Goodlette Rd (CR 851) south of Immokalee Rd (CR 846) 18,998 15,715 17,085 596 Q Goodlette Rd (CR 851) south of Orange Blossom Dr 30,506 25,810 23,414 28,177 506 Q Goodlette Rd (CR 851) south of Pine Ridge Rd (CR 896) 41,667 39,783 35,164 37,140 642 Q Green Blvd east of Santa Barbara Blvd 12,021 12,509 12,070 12,209 643 Q Green Blvd west of Collier Blvd (CR 951) 10,417 10,450 9,067 10,098 583 A Gulfshore Dr south of Bayview Dr 1 /15/2019 Collier County Quarterly Traffic Counts Report 2018 o w C U a� H Location Q1-2018* Q2-2018* Q3-2018* Q4-2018* 625 Q Immokalee Rd (CR 846) east of Goodlette Rd (CR 851) 55,725 53,474 44,746 46,769 567 Q Immokalee Rd (CR 846) east of Airport Rd (CR 31) 62,839 60,419 47,125 55,566 593 Q Immokalee Rd (CR 846) east of Collier Blvd (CR 951) 39,492 33,781 31,880 34,416 568 Q Immokalee Rd (CR 846) east of 1-75 (SR 93) 41,806 40,432 35,330 38,057 566 Q Immokalee Rd (CR 846) east of Tamiami Tr (US 41/SR 45) 51,353 48,351 39,515 41,771 675 Q Immokalee Rd (CR 846) east of Wilson Blvd 41,840 40,831 40,730 41,307 620 Q Immokalee Rd (CR 846) north of Stockade Rd 14,704 8,792 7,674 671 Q Immokalee Rd (CR 846) south of Corkscrew Sanctuary Rd 8,769 7,369 8,999 9,566 586 Q Immokalee Rd (CR 846) south of Oil Well Rd (CR 858) 32,063 25,305 26,794 29,385 656 Q Immokalee Rd (CR 846) west of Collier Blvd (CR 951) 41,233 38,492 33,037 35,752 672 Q Immokalee Rd (CR 846) west of Everglades Blvd. 8,122 6,903 8,343 8,376 679 Q Immokalee Rd (CR 846) west of 1-75 (SR 93) 53,347 48,679 45,748 49,281 565 Q Immokalee Rd (CR 846) west of Tamiami Tr (US 41/SR 45) 684 Q Immokalee Road (CR 846 East) 3 miles east of 29 South 2,963 1,000 1,010 2,077 677 Q Immokalee Road (CR 846) east of Everglades Blvd 8,699 7,208 8,823 9,298 674 Q Immokalee Road (CR 846) west of Wilson Blvd 31,825 29,280 28,097 41,971 631 Q IJ & C Blvd west of Airport Rd (CR 31) 11,206 11,077 10,152 10,280 614 A Jane's Scenic Dr west of SR 29 626 609 Q Lake Traffod Rd (CR 890) west of Carson Rd 9,270 7,354 8,683 8,682 551 Q Lake Traffod Rd (CR 890) west of North 15th St (SR 29) 14,253 11,850 12,121 13,158 690 Q Livingston Rd (CR 881) 1.5 M north of Golden Gate Pkwy (CR 31,167 29,632 26,058 26,151 574 Q Livingston Rd CR 881 north of Mediterra 24,458 21,027 15,333 19,510 575 Q Livingston Rd (CR 881) north of Pine Ridge Rd (CR 896) 29,496 27,346 25,553 27,477 687 Q Livingston Rd (CR 881) south of Golden Gate Pkwy (CR 886) 28,978 29,717 24,744 33,766 597 Q Livingston Rd (CR 881) south of Immokalee Rd (CR 846) 35,167 32,038 28,864 32,872 576 Q Livingston Rd CR 881 south of Vanderbilt Beach Rd CR 862 30,638 28,677 28,128 28,128 673 Q Livingston Road (CR 881) north of Immokalee Road (CR 846) 26,940 24,164 22,840 24,861 686 Q Livingston Road (CR 881) north of Radio Road (CR 856) 22,877 22,654 17,663 19,146 587 Q Logan Blvd north of Pine Ridge Rd (CR 896) 13,265 13,173 12,253 14,288 644 Q Logan Blvd north of Vanderbilt Beach Rd (CR 862 11,407 9,546 10,232 11,385 654 Q Logan Blvd south of Vanderbilt Beach Ext (CR 862) 12,385 12,083 11,284 12,221 588 Q Logan Blvd/Santa Barbara Blvd south of Pine Ridge Rd (CR 89 30,792 30,690 29,158 30,457 664 Q Main St (SR 29) west of South 1st St (CR 846) 13,516 10,263 10,673 12,490 723 S Manatee Rd east of Collier Blvd (CR 951) 5,788 4,016 592 Q Naples Blvd west of Cosco Entrance 11,915 10,484 9,840 13,865 612 Q New Market Rd (CR 29 A) east of Main St (SR 29) 11,961 8,648 9,037 11,342 550 Q New Market Rd (CR 29A) west of Broward St 9,602 5,708 6,066 8,925 683 Q North 15th St (SR 29) south of Lake Trafford Rd (CR 890) 17,755 14,291 14,743 16,406 663 Q North 15th St (SR 29) north of Lake Trafford Rd (CR 890) 0 11,725 12,365 14,058 695 Q North 15th Street (SR 29) south of SR 82 21,949 18,064 17,165 20,444 590 Q North First St north of Main St (SR 29) 11,993 10,621 10,948 692 Q North Road west of Airport Road (CR 31) 3,021 2,690 1,781 2,360 645 Q 10akes Blvd north of Vanderbilt Beach Rd (CR 862) 9,657 8,422 7,768 9,817 682 Q 10akes Blvd south of Immokalee Rd (CR 846) 4,226 4,849 3,649 4,059 725 S 1 Oil Well Rd (CR 858) east of Corkscrew Middle/Elem Sch 15,028 15,713 694 Q 1 Oil Well Rd (CR 858) east of Everglades Blvd 7,741 6,469 7,261 7,499 649 Q Oil Well Rd (CR 8585) east of Immokalee Rd (CR 846) 17,412 13,553 15,569 17,540 547 Q Old US 41 (CR 887) at Lee County Line 19,104 15,112 15,946 16,257 697 Q Orange Blossom Dr east of Airport Rd 11,694 11,956 8,386 10,017 647 Q Orange Blossom Dr east of Timberline Dr 8,486 8,927 5,994 8,760 526 Q Pine Ridge Rd (CR 896) east of Airport Rd (CR 31) 51,655 43,672 45,286 68,194 514 Q Pine Ridge Rd (CR 896) east of Goodlette Rd (CR 851) 40,095 38,050 36,181 37,058 628 Q Pine Ridge Rd (CR 896) east of Livingston Rd (CR 881) 56,514 55,544 52,444 53,016 535 Q Pine Ridge Rd (CR 896) east of Logan Blvd/Santa Barbara Blv 23,187 24,627 21,407 23,418 512 Q Pine Ridge Rd (CR 896) east of Tamiami Trail (US 41/SR 45) 37,616 31,054 29,839 30,917 515 Q Pine Ridge Rd (CR 896) west of Airport Rd (CR 31) 53,608 53,511 44,555 61,603 600 Q Pine Ridge Rd (CR 896) west of Logan Blvd/Santa Barbara Blv 33,835 37,492 35,995 33,188 662 Q Pine Ridge Road east of Whippoorwill Lane 39,924 37,199 34,949 58,565 634 A Plantation Parkway east of CR 29 464 544 Q Radio Rd (CR 856) east of Airport Rd (CR 31) 23,440 24,214 20,940 21,571 589 Q Radio Rd (CR 856) east of Santa Barbara Blvd 20,161 16,282 15,283 16,720 685 Q Radio Rd (CR 856) west of Davis Blvd (SR 84) 14,485 13,114 12,161 15,954 527 Q Radio Rd (CR 856) west of Santa Barbara Blvd 20,387 18,979 17,424 19,965 688 Q Radio Road (CR 856) east of Livingston Road (CR 881) 18,544 16,115 15,397 16,230 689 Q Radio Road (CR 856) west of Livingston Road (CR 881) 16,181 15,222 13,417 16,249 721 A Randall Blvd east of Everglades Blvd (Midway to Desoto Blvd) 2,422 651 Q Randall Blvd east of Immokalee Rd (CR 846) 15,094 13,418 14,818 14,775 516 Q Rattlesnake Ham Rd (CR 864) east of Tamiami Tr (US 41/SR 23,445 22,800 16,084 17,244 518 Q Rattlesnake Ham Rd (CR 864) west of Collier Blvd (CR 951) 1 13,055 10,7571 10,615 14,158 1 /15/2019 Collier County Quarterly Traffic Counts Report 2018 o w U a� H Location Q1-2018* Q2-2018* Q3-2018* Q4-2018* 517 Q Rattlesnake Ham Rd (CR 864) west of County Barn Rd 19,894 16,506 13,874 14,846 534 Q Rattlesnake Hammock Rd (CR 864) east of County Barn Rd 18,983 15,159 12,712 14,490 648 S Sanctuary Rd north of Immokalee Rd (CR 846) 1,001 537 Q Santa Barbara Blvd north of Davis Blvd (SR 84) 30,640 30,084 24,011 30,200 529 Q Santa Barbara Blvd north of Golden Gate Pkwy (CR 886) 24,543 20,961 19,869 35,363 606 Q ISanta Barbara Blvd north of Radio Rd (CR 856) 31,569 28,437 27,260 29,278 702 Q ISanta Barbara Blvd south of Davis Blvd 21,429 22,506 19,294 19,932 528 Q ISanta Barbara Blvd south of Golden Gate Pkwy (CR 886) 40,442 39,480 37,381 45,025 511 Q I Seagate Dr west of Tamiami Trail (US 41/SR 45) 20,004 19,163 18,590 18,640 720 S Shadowlawn Dr north of Davis Blvd (SR 84) 2,775 2,333 523 Q Shadowlawn Dr south of Davis Blvd (SR 84) 5,244 5,658 3,752 4,000 549 Q South First St (CR 846) south of Main St (SR 29) 19,464 15,079 15,235 18,139 665 A SR 29 north of Farm Worker's Village 8,254 591 A SR 29 north of SR 82 7,960 615 A jSR 29 north of Tamiami Trail (US 41/SR 90) 2,827 696 Q I SR 29 south of Oil Well Road 4,426 3,917 4,092 4,438 661 A I SR 82 west of SR 29 16,537 561 Q Tamiami Tr (US 41/SR 45) south of Pine Ridge Rd (CR 896) 44,284 40,764 38,757 49,670 563 Q Tamiami Tr (US 41/SR 45) south of Vanderbilt Bch Rd (CR 862 53,030 47,810 43,582 47,251 572 Q Tamiami Tr (US 41/SR 90) east of Rattlesnake Ham Rd (CR 86 44,704 31,967 33,755 35,325 546 Q Tamiami Trail (US 41/SR 45) at Lee County Line 48,016 47,060 34,816 35,672 564 Q Tamiami Trail (US 41/SR 45) north of Immokalee Rd (CR 864) 53,003 52,475 39,706 41,422 562 Q ITamiami Trail (US 41/SR 45) north of Pine Ridge Rd (CR 896) 40,406 36,671 32,624 48,738 577 Q ITamiami Trail (US 41/SR 45) south of 99th Avenue North 44,104 43,582 27,983 36,080 604 Q ITamiami Trail (US 41/SR 90) east of Airport Rd (CR 31) 54,319 54,156 35,284 51,007 608 Q ITamiami Trail (US 41/SR 90) east of Collier Blvd (CR 951) 21,984 17,210 16,202 33,598 545 Q ITamiami Trail (US 41/SR 90) east of Davis Blvd (SR 84) 38,214 26,848 27,529 35,424 616 A ITamiami Trail (US 41/SR 90) east of SR29/CR 29 4,024 571 Q ITamiami Trail (US 41/SR 90) west of Collier Blvd (SR 951) 44,748 29,142 29,620 36,218 570 Q Tamiami Trail (US 41/SR 90) west of San Marco Rd (CR 92) 4,630 4,275 4,349 5,527 617 A Tamiami Trail (US 41/SR 90) west of SR29/CR 29 4,632 698 Q Thomasson Dr. west of US 41 13,381 12,765 9,158 10,059 524 Q Vanderbilt Bch Rd (CR 862) west of Tamiami Tr (US 41/SR 45) 23,023 15,744 15,234 17,861 646 Q Vanderbilt Beach Ext (CR 862) east of Pelican Ridge 35,613 28,3281 25,562 33,854 579 Q IVanderbilt Beach Rd (CR 862) east of Airport Rd (CR 31) 33,826 30,702 29,412 30,765 666 Q IVanderbilt Beach Rd (CR 862) east of Goodlette Rd (CR 851) 40,207 35,184 31,119 37,682 630 Q IVanderbilt Beach Rd (CR 862) east of Livingston Rd (CR 881) 36,647 34,834 33,165 34,829 668 Q IVanderbilt Beach Rd (CR 862) east of Vineyards Blvd 38,185 32,724 32,353 42,314 580 Q IVanderbilt Beach Rd (CR 862) west of Collier Blvd (CR 951) 29,076 30,653 20,729 28,106 667 Q IVanderbilt Beach Rd (CR 862) west of Oakes Blvd 40,131 36,526 36,074 45,797 629 Q IVanderbilt Beach Road (CR 862) west of Livingston Road (CR 39,807 33,996 29,594 34,113 578 Q IVanderbilt Dr (CR 901) north of 111th Avenue North 633 Q IVanderbilt Dr (CR 901) north of Vanderbilt Bch Rd (CR 862) 548 Q IVanderbilt Dr (CR 901) north of Wiggins Pass Rd (CR 888) 632 Q IVanderbilt Dr (CR 901) south of 111th Ave N 640 A IVineyards Blvd south of Vanderbilt Beach Rd (CR 862) 8,651 611 Q lWestclock Rd west of North 15th St (SR 29) 2,816 3,270 3,316 4,571 670 Q Wiggins Pass Rd (CR 888) east of Vanderbilt Dr (CR 901) 669 Q Wiggins Pass Rd (CR 888) west of Tamiami Tr (US 41/SR 45) 680 Q Wilson Blvd north of Golden Gate Blvd (CR 876) 7,608 7,988 8,856 676 Q Wilson Blvd north of Immokalee Rd (CR 846) 2,006 1,846 1,781 1,849 681 Q Wilson Blvd south of Golden Gate Blvd (CR 876) 364 347 401 355 650 Q Wilson Blvd south of Immokalee Rd (CR 846) 7,630 8,051 8,294 Annual Count Stations Quarterly Count Stations Semi -Annual Count Stations A Q S Construction (unable to get counts) * The counts, listed are an avarage of all counts taken at each station during the calendar year indicated and represent an estimate of the average weekday traffic for each location for a 24 hour period. 1 /15/2019 Appendix B.4 D 1 RPM to 0 a 82900 NJ d N q,�p 89580 1p n d d d N • 'L�nl 90560 Nt Immokelee Carridor Congestion Study FDOT D1 RPM CGIUIIDG� (Licensed to CH2M HM) 89580 O " r ry --a • w 84730 90580 .A m Z 92890 Immokalee Carridar Congestion Study FDOT ❑1 RPM G)IUIIDG� (Licensed to CH2M Hill) n . • $5,>0 - 5670 - 567� �0 V V p VI O O � a a 42890 78890 w w a 84530 79160 Immokalee Corridor Congestion Study FD]T DI RPM CBRILp (Licensed to CH2M Hill) co ca w 0 lbo .$3 o - 6 - M • �,3g0 • �,5�0 V 84530 79160 - 3500 79160 �o 77940 77940 R �n 75420 Immvkalee Carridar Congestion Study FDOT DI RPM CBRILp (Licensed to CH2M Hill) Appendix B.5 Traffic Projections Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study from Livingston Road to Logan Boulevard Projected 2040 Traffic Volumes Count Station Segment Existing Counts Growth Projection Method 2040 Volumes ID Source Location From To Existing Count Peak Season Conversion Factor Adjusted Existing Count 2040 D1 RPM Historical Regression 2% Growth Highest Growth (Worst Case) Lowest Growth (Best Case) Growth % (Worst Case) Growth % (Best Case) 567 County Immokalee Rd. Airport Pulling Rd. Livingston Rd. 55,967 1.06 59,400 82,900 101,500 90,000 101,500 90,000 2.58% 2.00% 597 County Livingston Rd. Vanderbilt Beach Rd. Immokalee Rd. 35,659 0.97 34,600 62,290 60,800 52,500 62,290 52,500 2.84% 2.01 % 673 County Livingston Rd. Immokalee Rd. Veterans Memorial Blvd. 27,318 0.97 26,500 74,040 34,700 40,200 74,040 34,700 5.01% 1.29% 679 County Immokalee Rd. Livingston Rd. I-75 53,845 0.98 52,800 89,580 71,800 80,000 89,580 71,800 2.55% 1.47% 7032 FDOT I-75 Southbound On -Ramp Immokalee Road 1-75 8,900 0.97 8,700 9,160 22,600 13,400 22,600 13,400 4.43% 1.98% 7034 FDOT 1-75 Southbound Off -Ramp 1-75 Immokalee Rd. 18,000 0.97 17,500 20,730 33,300 27,000 33,300 27,000 2.97% 1.99% 747 County Immokalee Rd. 1-75 Southbound Ramps 1-75 Northbound Ramps 73,829 0.98 72,400 90,580 N/A 109,700 109,700 90,580 2.00% 1.07% 7031 FDOT 1-75 Northbound Off -Ramp 1-75 Immokalee Rd. 8,800 0.97 8,600 7,740 20,000 13,200 20,000 13,200 3.91% 1.97% 7033 FDOT 1-75 Northbound On -Ramp Immokalee Rd. 1-75 18,500 0.97 18,000 18,270 34,300 27,800 34,300 27,800 2.97% 2.00% 701 County Immokalee Rd. Oakes Blvd. Valewood Dr. 53,645 0.98 52,600 84,530 79,900 78,900 84,530 78,900 2.28% 1.95% 682 County Oakes Blvd. Vanderbilt Beach Rd. Immokalee Rd. 4,389 0.98 4,400 9,750 5,000 6,600 9,750 5,000 3.86% 0.61% 568 County Immokalee Rd. 1-75 Logan Blvd. 50,705 1.06 53,800 92,890 65,800 81,500 92,890 65,800 2.63% 0.96% 644 County Logan Blvd. Vanderbilt Beach Rd. Immokalee Rd. 12,262 0.98 12,100 4,630 24,200 18,300 24,200 18,300 3.36% 1.99% 656 County Immokalee Rd. Logan Blvd. Collier Blvd. 41,728 0.98 40,900 75,420 74,800 62,000 75,420 62,000 2.96% 2.00% Immokalee Corridor Congestion Study Turning Movement Volumes N/S Roadway: Livingston Rd E/W Roadway: Immokalee Rd Date Taken: 03/07/19 PSCF 0.97 2019 Background SF Adjustment 3042 Livingston Rd 1764 � 4 1277 527 808 430 Immokalee Rd 2705 338 N 2671 4110 � 893 w 0 U�97. E� 4350 1405 174 S 1671 Immokalee Rd 301 544 1387 � II A 348 1193 2580 Livingston Rd 2019 Background Count 3136 Livingston Rd 1819 � 4 1317 543 833 443 Immokalee Rd 2789 348 N 408 2762 4237 921 W E 1,936 4485 1448 179 S 418 1723 Immokalee Rd 310 5611 359 1430 � II 1230 2660 Livingston Rd 2025 Background 1.3% 3335 Livingston Rd 1907 � 4 1428 569 873 465 Immokalee Rd 2959 N 433 2927 A81,; 4542 <w E 20514791 1583 S 443 1864 Immokalee Rd 339 6144 393 1512 � II 1346 2858 Llvinga 2040 Background 1.3% 4189 Livingston Rd 2312 4 1877 690 1059 563 Immokales Rd 3701 512;VV N 539 3645 5831 1354 E 2554 < 6091 2130 264S 552 2446 Immokalee Rtl 826 529 1875 �� 1812 3687 Living; 2.0% AM Peak Best Case Volumes Immokalee Corridor Congestion Study Turning Movement Volumes N/S Roadway: Strand Blvd / Juliet Blvd E/W Roadway: Immokalee Rd Date Taken: 03/07/19 PSCF 0.97 2019 Background SF Adjustment 838 Strand Blvd/ Juliet Blvd 338 4 501 207 17 3 Immokalee Rd 2646 212 N 2675 4370 1362 w U<�= E4242 1724 149 S 1567 Immokalee Rd 147 26A 91 288 265 553 Strand Blvd / Juliet Blvd 2019 Background Count 864 Strand Blvd / Jullet Blvd 348 H 516 213 18 117 Immokalee Rd 2728 219 N 2,2758 14505 ,404 W E 4373 1541777 S 125 1615 Immokalee Rd 152 27n 94 297 g II 273 570 Strand Blvd / Jullet Blvd Auco macKgrouna 0.8 % 903 Strand Blvd / Juliet Blvd 356 A 4 147 217 19 120 Immokalee Rd 2883 232 N 286 2922 4766 1487 IN E 2503 4630 1883 164 S 133 1708 Immokalee Rd 316 g � 293 609 Strand 1.7% 2040 Background 0.8% 1085 Strand Blvd/Juliet Blvd 401 4 684 245 21 135 Immokalee Rd 3571 289 N 357 3639 5916 1852 W o E 3117 5755 2345 204 S 165 2116 Immokalee Rd 209 388 129 390 A II 376 766 Strand 1.7% AM Peak Best Case Volumes Immokalee Corridor Congestion Study Turning Movement Volumes N/S Roadway: 1-75 SB Ramps E/W Roadway: Immokalee Rd Date Taken: 03/07/19 PSCF 0.97 2019 Background SF Adjustment 1-75 SB Ramps n1510 1510 4 0 43 0 767 Immokalee Rd 2753 0 N 0 2478 4328 1271 W 0 E 2010 4516 1575 305 S 489 2038 Immokalee Rd 0 0A 0 773 0 773 1-75 SB Ramps 1557 1-75 SB Ramps 1557 4 0 766 0 791 Immokalee Rd 2838 0 N 0 2555 4462 = 1,310 W E 2,072 4656 1624 314 S 483 2101 Immokalee Rd 0 0A 0 797 0 797 1-75 SB Ramps 2025 Background 2.0% 1701 1-75 SB Ramps 1701 4 0 837 0 864 Immokalee Rd 2980 0 N 0 2643 4701 <= 1388 W E 2143 4895 1721 333 S 500 2252 Immokalee Rd 0 0A 0 833 `� 0 833 1-75 SE 2.0% 2040 Background 2.0% 2285 1.75 SB Ramps 2285 H 0 1124 0 1161 Immokalee Rd 3639 0 N 0 3102 5782 � 1728 W E 2515 < 5991 2143 415 S 587 2889 Immokalee Rd 0 0 0 1002 �� 0 1002 1.75 SE 2.0% AM Peak Best Case Volumes Immokalee Corridor Congestion Study Turning Movement Volumes N/S Roadway: 1-75 NB Ramps E/W Roadway: Immokalee Rd Date Taken: 03/07/19 PSCF 0.97 2019 Background SF Adjustment �11434 1-75 NB Ramps 0 4 1434 0 0JEk20 Immokalee Rd 2514 455 N2997 4587 1618 Wo 4887 2073 0 s1890 Immokalee Rd 495 1A 272 0 767 767 1-75 NB Ramps 2019 Background Count 1478 1-75 NB Ramps 0 � 4 1478 0 0 0 Immokalee Rd 2592A N 1,008 3090 4729 W E 2,082 5038 2137S 0 1948 Immokalee Rd 510 1A 280 0 791 791 1-75 NB Ramps 2025 Background 2.0% 11531 1-75 NB Ramps 0 II 4 1131 VVVO 0 0 Immokalee Rd 2711 486 N 1043 3197 4922 � 1725 W E 2154 5228 2211 0 S 0 2031 Immokalee Rd 557 2A 306 0 865 865 1-75 NE 2040 Background 2.0% 1796 1.75 NS Ramps 0 4 17% 0 0 0 Immokalee Rd 3272 570 N 5867 2025 W E< U3751 6185 2595 0 S 2434 Immokalee Rd 745 0 2 409 �� 1156 1156 1.75 NE 2.0 AM Peak Best Case Volumes Immokalee Corridor Congestion Study Turning Movement Volumes N/S Roadway: Northbrooke Dr / Tarpon Bay Blvd E/W Roadway: Immokalee Rd Date Taken: 03/07/19 PSCF 0.97 2019 Background SF Adjustment 834 Northbrooke Dr/Tarpon Bay Blvd 460 4 374 313 61 85 Immokalee Rd 2936 252 N 2471 4788 1455 W 0 E U39144103 1852 145 S 1627 Immokalee Rd 269 279 74A 86 � I I 429 708 Northbrooke Dr/ Tarpon Bay Blvd 2019 Background Count 860 Northbrooke Dr/Tarpon Bay Blvd 474 � 4 386 323 63 88 Immokalee Rd 3027A N 50 2553 4936 �W E 2,427 4230 1909 S 76 1677 Immokalee Rd 277 766 89 288 � I I -2 730 Northbrooke Dr / Tarpon Bay Blvd mZo macKgrouna 0.8% 890 Northbrooke Dr/Tarpon Bay Blvd 4a4 � 4 406 329 65 90 Immokalee RdFIEIWLT ■ 3270A152 N k 2782 5246 �W E 4520 1976 S 1738 40mmokalee Rd 303 � I I 475 778 Northb 1.7% 2040 Background 0.8% 1039 Northbrooke Dr/ Tarpon Bay Blvd 545 � 4 494 371 73 101 Immokalee Rd 4283 316 N 6601 1821 W E< U3716 5761 2318 181 S 2045 Immokalee Rd 380 365 10A5 123 608 973 Northh 1.7% AM Peak Best Case Volumes Immokalee Corridor Congestion Study Turning Movement Volumes N/S Roadway: Oakes Blvd E/W Roadway: Immokalee Rd Date Taken: 03/07/19 PSCF 0.97 2019 Background SF Adjustment 173 Oakes Blvd 1 �4 172 1 0 JE Immokalee Rd 2575 50 Nk274 26964225 =W 4289 1650 65 S1594 Immokalee Rd 0 0A 59 65 59 124 Oakes Blvd 2019 Background Count 178 Oakes Blvd 1 �4 177 1 0 0 Immokalee Rd 2655 52 N 125 2779 4356 1,582 W E 2,654 4422 1701 87 S 1643 Immokalee Rd 0 0A 61 67 � I I 61 128 Oakes Blvd 2025 Background 0.3% 195 Oakes Blvd 1 �4 194 1 0 0 Immokalee Rd 2892 57 N 137 3028 4746 <= 1724 W E 2881 4814 1854 73 S 0 1786 Immokalee Rd 0 0A 62 73 62 135 Oakes 2040 Background 0.3% 260 Oakes Blvd 2 4 258 2 0 0 Immokalee Rd 3864 76 N 6340 2w E jr4044 6414 2476 98 S 2370 Immokalee Rd 0 98 068 � II A 68 166 Oakes 0.6% AM Peak Best Case Volumes Immokalee Corridor Congestion Study Turning Movement Volumes N/S Roadway: Valewood Dr E/W Roadway: Immokalee Rd Date Taken: 03/07/19 PSCF 0.97 2019 Background SF Adjustment 700 Valewood Dr 402 4 299 290 37 75 Immokalee Rd 27361=�� N U4111 2484 4321 W 0 E 3923 1585 8 1439 Immokalee Rd 30 4910 86 � II A 89 176 Valewood Dr 2019 Background Count 722 Valewood Dr 414 � 4 308 299 38 77 Immokalee Rd 2821 237 N 20 2561 4455 1,396 w E 2,491 4044 1634 1 S 50 1483 Immokalee Rd 31 511 10 89 � I I 92 181 Valewood Dr 2025 Background 0.8% 759 Valewootl Dr 423 H 336 305 39 79 Immokalee Rd 3053 259 N 22 2791 4835 1521 W E 2114 4402 1782 2 S 55 1611 Immokalee Rd 34 555 11 96 H 100 196 Val— 1.7% 2040 Background 0.8% 921 Valewood Dr 476 4 445 343 44 88 Immokalee Rd 4011 345 N 6390 2032 W E< U3728 5863 2379 2 S 2135 Immokalee Rd 43 70A 14 119 � I I 127 246 Valewr 1.7% AM Peak Best Case Volumes Immokalee Corridor Congestion Study Turning Movement Volumes N/S Roadway: Palazzo Dr E/W Roadway: Immokalee Rd Date Taken: 03/07/19 PSCF 0.97 2019 Background SF Adjustment 209 Palauo Dr 20 H 188 20 0 0 Immokalee Rd 2469 20 N 168 2611 3916 1427 W 0 E 2448 � 4043 1447 0 S 0 1427 Immokalee Rd 0 0 0A 0 0 Palauo Dr 2019 Background Count 215 Palauo Dr 21 H 194 21 0 0 Immokalee Rd 2545A N 173 2697 4037 �W E 2,124 4168 1492S 0 1471 Immokalee Rd 0 0A 0 0 �II 0 0 Palauo Dr 2025 Background 0.8% 222 Palauo Dr 22 � 4 200 22 0 0 Immokalee Rd FIEIWLT 2616 22 N 178 2772 4150 1512 W E 2594 = 4284 1534 0 S 0 1512 Immokalee Rd 0 00 A 0 �II 0 0 1.7% 2040 Background 0.8% 256 Palar o Dr 25 4 231 25 0 0 Immokalee Rd 3020 25 N 206 3201 4791 1746 W E 2995 4947 1771 0 S 0 1746 Immokalee Rd 0 0A 0 0 0 1.7% AM Peak Best Case Volumes Immokalee Corridor Congestion Study Turning Movement Volumes N/S Roadway: Logan Blvd E/W Roadway: Immokalee Rd Date Taken: 03/07/19 PSCF 0.97 2019 Background SF Adjustment 832 Logan Blvd 487 4 345 231 134 122 Immokalee Rd 2660 167 N 105 2551 4154 1180 W 0 E 2211 3996 1494 147 s 243 1438 Immokalee Rd 218 74A 136 525 Z II 428 953 Logan Blvd 2019 Background Count 858 Logan Blvd 502 � 4 356 238 138 126 Immokalee Rd 2742 172 N 108 2638 4282 1,216 W E 2,279 4120 1540 152 S 251 1482 Immokalee Rd 225 766 140 541 -1 982 Logan Blvd 2025 Background 2.0% 927 Logan Blvd 549 � 4 378 260 151 138 Immokalee Rd 2996]:kvv N 118 2883 4580 � E 2490 � 4424 1584S 275 1541 Immokalee Rd 833 153 583 � I I 482 1065 Logan 2040 Background 2.0% 1214 Logan Blvd 738 4 476 350 203 185 Immokalee Rd 4033'1443 N k 3881 5862 W E< 5715 1829 S 1834 Immokalee Rd 331 112 206 754 H 649 1403 Logan 2.0% AM Peak Best Case Volumes Immokalee Corridor Congestion Study Turning Movement Volumes N/S Roadway: Livingston Rd E/W Roadway: Immokalee Rd Date Taken: 03/07/19 PSCF 0.97 2019 Background SF Adjustment 3471 Livingston Rd 1831 � 4 1639 485 923 423 Immokalee Rd 1746 327 N 480 1755 3892 1604 W E 1.8 4208 2146 214 S 237 2453 Immokalee Rd 223 8322 426 1374 Z II 1481 2856 Livingston Rd 3578 Livingston Rd 1888 � 4 1690 500 952 436 Immokalee Rd 1800 337 N 495 1809 4012 1,654 W E 1,070 4338 2212 221 S 244 2529 Immokalee Rd 230 8588 439 1417 � II 1127 2944 Livingston Rd zoca IsacKgrouna 1.3% 3811 Livingston Rd 1979 � 4 1-2 734 524 998 457 Immokalee Rc 394"IMIRK —19 1910 369 N Cj1918 4328 1807 W E4662 2418 242 S 2744mmokalee Rd 1499 � II 1670 3169 Living 2040 Background 1.3% 4812 Livingston Rd 2400 4 2412 636 1210 554 Immokalee Rd 2387 496 N 2387 5639 � 2431 W k1412 E< 6019 3252 325 S 3632 Immokalee Rd 339 1263 647 1857 2249 4106 Living; 2.0% PM Peak Best Case Volumes Immokalee Corridor Congestion Study Turning Movement Volumes N/S Roadway: Strand Blvd / Juliet Blvd E/W Roadway: Immokalee Rd Date Taken: 03/07/19 PSCF 0.97 2019 Background SF Adjustment 887 Strand Blvd/ Juliet Blvd 515 4 372 261 32 222 Immokalee Rd 1836 185 N 162 1824 4511 2203 w E 1137 4398 2675 287 S 225 2574 Immokalee Rd 139 24A 149 544 Z II 312 857 Strand Blvd / Juliet Blvd 2019 Background Count 914 Strand Blvd / Jullet Blvd 531 A 4 383 269 33 229 Immokalee Rd 1893 191 N 1880 4651 2,271 W 0 E 4534 U232 2758 296 S 2654 Immokalee Rd 143 25n 154 561 g II 322 883 Strand Blvd / Jullet Blvd 2025 Backaround 0.8 % 949 Strand Blvd / Juliet Blvd 542 A 4 407 274 34 234 Immokalee Rd 1997 203 N 177 1992 4920 569 4797 314 2462923 2805 1.5% Immokalee Rd 154 277 165 594 g II 346 940 Strand 1.7% 2040 Background 0.8% 1118 Strand Blvd/Juliet Blvd 610 4 508 308 38 263 Immokalee Rd 2460 252 N 221 2482 6099 2996 W E 1954 5953 3639 391 S 307 3471 Immokalee Rd 197 35 212 736 A � 444 1180 Strand 1.7% PM Peak Best Case Volumes Immokalee Corridor Congestion Study Turning Movement Volumes N/S Roadway: 1-75 SB Ramps E/W Roadway: Immokalee Rd Date Taken: 03/07/19 PSCF 0.97 2019 Background SF Adjustment 1235 1-75 SB Ramps 1235 4 0 375 0 859 Immokalee Rd 1698 0 N 0 1475 4230 � 2143 W 0 E 1322 � 4478 2533 390 S 153 3002 Immokalee Rd 0 0A 0 543 0 543 1-75 SB Ramps 2019 Background Count 1273 1-75 SB Ramps 1273 4 0 387 0 886 Immokalee Rd 1750 0 N 0 1521 4361 2,208 W E 1,363 4616 2611 402 S 158 3095 Immokalee Rd 0 0A 0 560 0 560 1-75 SB Ramps 2025 Background 2.0% 1391 1-75 SB Ramps 1391 4 0 423 0 968 Immokalee Rd 1833 0 N 0 1574 4599 <= 2340 W E 1410 4882 2766 426 S 164 3308 Immokalee Rd 0 0A 0 590 z II 0 590 1-75 SE 2040 Background 2.0% 1869 1.75 SS Ramps 1869 H 0 568 0 1301 Immokalee Rd 2223 0 N 0 1847 5668 2914 W E 1655 < 6062 3445 531 S 192 4215 Immokalee Rd 0 0A 0 723 0 723 1.75 SE 2.0% PM Peak Best Case Volumes Immokalee Corridor Congestion Study Turning Movement Volumes N/S Roadway: 1-75 NB Ramps E/W Roadway: Immokalee Rd Date Taken: 03/07/19 PSCF 0.97 2019 Background SF Adjustment n37 937 1-75 NB Ramps VVV 0 II 4 9 0 O 0 Immokalee Rd 1480 599 N 338 1411 4467 2387 W 0 E 1148 4155 2987 0 S 0 2669 Immokalee Rd 332 0A 282 0 1114 614 1-75 NB Ramps 2019 Background Count 966 1-75 NB Ramps 0 � 4 966 0 0 0 Immokalee Rd 1526A N 348 1532 4605 W E 1,184 4284 3079S 0 2752 Immokalee Rd 342 0A 291 0 � I I 633 633 1-75 NB Ramps 2025 Background 2.0% 11000 1-75 NB Ramps 0 II 4 1000 VVVO 0 0 Immokalee Rd 1598 N 3601585 ]WI 4783 W E 1225 4448 3185 S 0 2863 Immokalee Rd 373 0A 318 0 691 691 1-75 NE 2040 Background 2.0% 1173 1.75 NB Ramps 0 � 4 1113 0 0 0 Immokalee Rd 1937 750 N 1860 5874 � 2987 W EJ14317� 5272 3737 0 S 3412 Immokalee Rd 500 0 0A 425 925 925 1.75 NE PM Peak Best Case Volumes Immokalee Corridor Congestion Study Turning Movement Volumes N/S Roadway: Northbrooke Dr / Tarpon Bay Blvd E/W Roadway: Immokalee Rd Date Taken: 03/07/19 PSCF 0.97 2019 Background SF Adjustment 728 Northbrooke Dr/Tarpon Bay Blvd 364 � 4 364 61 65 38 Immokalee Rd 1463 249 N U114 1147 4174 2133 W 0 E 3508 2711 329 S 2362 Immokalee Rd 254 102A 91 480 -7 927 Northbrooke Dr/ Tarpon Bay Blvd 2019 Background Count 750 Northbrooke Dr/Tarpon Bay Blvd 375 � 4 375 166 67 142 Immokalee Rd 1508 257 N 13 1182 4303 2,198 W E 1,080 3617 2795 339 S 89 2435 Immokalee Rd 262 1055 94 495 � I I 461 956 Northbrooke Dr / Tarpon Bay Blvd mZo macKgrouna 0.8% 777 Northbrooke Dr/Tarpon Bay Blvd 383 4 394 169 69 145 Immokalee RdFIEIWLT ■ 1627 266 N 15 1289 4519 � 2275 W E 1177 � 3810 2892 35 SS 97 2521 Immokalee Rd 517 � I I 495 1012 Northb 1.7% 2040 Background 0.8% 907 Northbrooke Dr/ Tarpon Bay Blvd 431 4 476 191 77 163 Immokalee Rd 2123 312 N E 1�17 4685516 �26 W 5 3393 S 130 2961 Immokalee Rd 360 145 129 619 1253 Northh 1.7% PM Peak Best Case Volumes Immokalee Corridor Congestion Study Turning Movement Volumes N/S Roadway: Oakes Blvd E/W Roadway: Immokalee Rd Date Taken: 03/07/19 PSCF 0.97 2019 Background SF Adjustment Oakes Blvd n119 22 4 97 22 0 0 Immokalee Rd 1188 25 N 1238 3557 2256 W 0 E U1663606 2369 87 s 2369 Immokalee Rd 0 0113 A 87 � II 113 200 Oakes Blvd 2019 Background Count 123 Oakes Blvd 23 H 100 23 0 0 Immokalee Rd 1225 28 N 74 1276 3667 2,326 W E 1,202 3718 2442 90 S 2442 Immokalee Rd 0 0A 116 90 � I I 116 206 Oakes Blvd 2025 Background 0.3% 133 Oakes Blvd 23 H 110 23 0 0 Immokalee Rd 1333 29 N 81 1391 3995 2534 W E 1310 4042 2662 99 S 0 2651 Immokalee Rd 0 0A 117 99 Z II 117 216 Oakes 2040 Background 0.3% 170 Oakes Blvd 24 4 146 24 0 0 Immokalee Rd 1773 38 N 5327 3385 W E< U1857 5370 3554 131 S 3513 Immokalee Rd 0 0A 128 131 128 259 Oakes 0.6% PM Peak Best Case Volumes Immokalee Corridor Congestion Study Turning Movement Volumes N/S Roadway: Valewood Dr E/W Roadway: Immokalee Rd Date Taken: 03/07/19 PSCF 0.97 2019 Background SF Adjustment 703 Valewood Dr 389 � 4 314 205 70jEr.6 Immokalee Rd 1227 209 N1025 3628 2184 W 0 3349 2401 8 S2324 Immokalee Rd 37 10225 113 � II A 164 277 Valewood Dr 2019 Background Count 725 Valewood Dr 401 � 4 324 211 72 118 Immokalee Rd 1265 215 N 4 1057 3740 2,112 W E 1,016 3453 2475 8 S 37 2396 Immokalee Rd 38 1055 26 117 H 169 286 Valewood Dr 2025 Background 0.8% 763 Valewood Dr 410 � 4 353 215 74 121 Immokalee Rd 1363 235 N 5 1153 4060 � 2453 W E 1107 3755 2697 9 S 41 2602 Immokalee Rd 41 1133 28 124 Z II 182 306 Val— 1.7% 2040 Background 0.8% 925 Valewood Dr 461 4 464 242 83 136 Immokalee Rd 1774 313 N 6 1539 5376 3277 W E 1479 < 4988 3602 12 S 54 3449 Immokalee Rd 53 145 36 149 383 Valewr 1.7% PM Peak Best Case Volumes Immokalee Corridor Congestion Study Turning Movement Volumes N/S Roadway: Palazzo Dr E/W Roadway: Immokalee Rd Date Taken: 03/07/19 PSCF 0.97 2019 Background SF Adjustment r�94 Palauo Dr 14 4 81 4 VVVO 0 Immokalee Rd 992 8 N 73 1051 3305 2305 W 0 E 979 3356 2312 0 S 0 2305 Immokalee Rd 0 0A 0 0 0 2019 Background Count 97 Palauo Dr 14 14 0 0 Immokalee Rd 1023A N 75 1084 3407 W E 1,0083460 2384S 0 2376 Immokalee Rd 0 0A 0 0 �II 0 0 2025 Background 0.8% 102 Pal—o Dr 15 4 87 15 0 0 Immokalee Rd FIEIWLT 1052 9 N 78 1115 3503 2442 W E 1037 3557 2451 0 S 0 2442 Immokalee Rd 0 00 A 0 �II 0 0 1.7% 2040 Background 0.8% 116 Palauo Dr 17 4 99 17 0 0 Immokalee Rd 1215 10 N U1287 40" 28W E< 4106 2829 0 S 2819 Immokalee Rd 0 0A 0 0 0 1.7% PM Peak Best Case Volumes Immokalee Corridor Congestion Study Turning Movement Volumes N/S Roadway: Logan Blvd E/W Roadway: Immokalee Rd Date Taken: 03/07/19 PSCF 0.97 2019 Background SF Adjustment 729 Logan Blvd 369 4 361 84 96 88 Immokalee Rd 1092 143 N 49 1251 3395 � 1923 w 0 E 864 3679 2303 238 S 346 2420 Immokalee Rd 144 170A 409 780 723 1503 Logan Blvd 2019 Background Count 752 Logan Blvd 380 � 4 372 87 202 91 Immokalee Rd 1126 147 N 50 1298 3500 � 1,982 W E 891 3793 2374 245 S 357 2495 Immokalee Rd 148 1755 422 804 H 745 1549 Logan Blvd 2025 Background 2.0% 815 Logan Blvd 416 � 4 399 95 221 100 Immokalee Rd 1231 A27 N 55 1419 3672 w E 974 4017 2441 S 390 2598 Immokalee Rd 162 1922 461 863 H 815 1678 Logan 2040 Background 2.0% 1065 Logan Blvd 559 4 506 128 297 134 Immokalee Rd 5 741657 171910 4475 2352 w E 1311 < 5016 2818 29 SS 525 3106 Immokalee Rd 218 257 620 1113 2208 Logan 2.0% PM Peak Best Case Volumes Immokalee Corridor Congestion Study Turning Movement Volumes N/S Roadway: Livingston Rd E/W Roadway: Immokalee Rd Date Taken: 03/07/19 PSCF 0.97 2019 Background SF Adjustment 3042 Livingston Rd 1764 � 4 1277 527 808 430 Immokalee Rd 2705 338 N 2671 4110 � 893 w 0 U�97. E� 4350 1405 174 S 1671 Immokalee Rd 301 544 1387 � II A 348 1193 2530 Livingston Rd 2019 Background Count 3136 Livingston Rd 1819 � 4 1317 543 833 443 Immokalee Rd 2789 348 N 408 2762 4237 921 W E 1,936 4485 1448 179 S 418 1723 Immokalee Rd 310 5611 359 1430 � II 1230 2660 Livingston Rd 2025 Background 5.0% 3867 Livingston Rd 2368 � 4 1499 707 1084 577 Immokalee Rd 3248A042 N 461 3118 4887 W E 2185 5149 1639 S 472 2031 Immokalee Rd 356 6" 412 1759 � II 1412 3171 Llvinga 2040 Background 5.0% 7160 Livingston Rd 4931 4 2229 1472 2258 1201 Immokales Rd 672 4547 N 5201 577;VV 7602 � 1527 E 3187 7902 2401 297S 688 3355 mmokalee Rd 980 627 3243 2149 5392 Living; 2.8% AM Peak Worst Case Volumes Immokalee Corridor Congestion Study Turning Movement Volumes N/S Roadway: Strand Blvd / Juliet Blvd E/W Roadway: Immokalee Rd Date Taken: 03/07/19 PSCF 0.97 2019 Background SF Adjustment 838 Strand Blvd/ Juliet Blvd 338 4 501 207 17 3 Immokalee Rd 2646 212 N 2675 4370 1362 w U<�= E4242 1724 149 S 1567 Immokalee Rd 147 26A 91 288 265 553 Strand Blvd / Juliet Blvd 2019 Background Count 864 Strand Blvd / Jullet Blvd 348 H 516 213 18 117 Immokalee Rd 2728 219 N 2,2758 14505 ,404 W E 4373 1541777 S 125 1615 Immokalee Rd 152 27n 94 297 g II 273 570 Strand Blvd / Jullet Blvd 2025 1.6 % 958� Strand Blvd / Juliet Blvd n{ 373 II II 585 nmokalee Rd 3072 24305 3113 5078 W 2 -4932 1742006 142 1819 Immokalee Rd 336 g � 320 656 Strand 3.2% 2040 Background 1.6% 1330 Strand Blvd/Juliet Blvd 473 4 857 288 25 159 Immokalee Rd 4462 361 N 445 4540 7388 2311 W E 38a9 7186 2926 254 S 206 2646 Immokalee Rd 284 51 176 485 A � 511 996 Strand 3.2% AM Peak Worst Case Volumes Immokalee Corridor Congestion Study Turning Movement Volumes N/S Roadway: 1-75 SB Ramps E/W Roadway: Immokalee Rd Date Taken: 03/07/19 PSCF 0.97 2019 Background SF Adjustment 1-75 SB Ramps n1510 1510 4 0 43 0 767 Immokalee Rd 2753 0 N 0 2478 4328 1271 w 0 E 2010 4516 1575 305 S 489 2038 Immokalee Rd 0 0A 0 773 0 773 1-75 SB Ramps 1557 1-75 SB Ramps 1557 4 0 766 0 791 Immokalee Rd 2838 0 N 0 2555 4462 = 1,310 W E 2,072 4656 1624 314 S 483 2101 Immokalee Rd 0 0A 0 797 0 797 1-75 SB Ramps 2025 Background 3.0% 1801 1-75 SB Ramps 1801 4 0 886 0 915 Immokalee Rd 3150 0 N 0 2792 4983 1478 w E 2264 � 5185 1833 355 S 528 2393 Immokalee Rd 0 00 883 � A II 0 883 1-75 SE 4.4% 2040 Background 3.0% 2792 1.75 SS Ramps 2792 H 0 1374 0 1418 Immokalee Rd 4420 0 N 0 3756 7093 2156 W E 3046 < 7330 2673 517 S 710 3574 Immokalee Rd 0 0 0 1227 0 122LL11/7 1.75 SE 4.4% AM Peak Worst Case Volumes Immokalee Corridor Congestion Study Turning Movement Volumes N/S Roadway: 1-75 NB Ramps E/W Roadway: Immokalee Rd Date Taken: 03/07/19 PSCF 0.97 2019 Background SF Adjustment �11434 1-75 NB Ramps 0 4 1434 0 0JEk20 Immokalee Rd 2514 455 N2997 4587 1618 Wo 4887 2073 0 s1890 Immokalee Rd 495 1A 272 0 767 767 1-75 NB Ramps 2019 Background Count 1478 1-75 NB Ramps 0 � 4 1478 0 0 0 Immokalee Rd 2592A N 1,008 3090 4729 W E 2,082 5038 2137S 0 1948 Immokalee Rd 510 1A 280 0 791 791 1-75 NB Ramps 2025 Background 3.0% 1-75 NB Ramps n1617 0 114 1611 VVVO 0 0 Immokalee Rd 2898 513 N 1102 3377 5233 � 1822 W E 2275 � 5541 2335 0 S 0 2164 Immokalee Rd 623 2A 342 0 � I I 967 967 1-75 NE 2040 Background 3.0% 2175 1.75 NB Ramps 0 4 2115 0 0 0 Immokalee Rd 4168 690 N 7310 2452 W E< U4542 7602 3142 0 S 3060 Immokalee Rd 1108 3 608 0 �� 1719 1719 1.75 NE AM Peak Worst Case Volumes Immokalee Corridor Congestion Study Turning Movement Volumes N/S Roadway: Northbrooke or / Tarpon Bay Blvd E/W Roadway: Immokalee Rd Date Taken: 03/07/19 PSCF 0.97 2019 Background SF Adjustment 834 Northbrooke Dr/Tarpon Bay Blvd 460 4 374 313 61 85 Immokalee Rd 2936 252 N 2471 4788 1455 w 0 E U39144103 1852 145 S 1627 Immokalee Rd 269 279 74A 86 � I I 429 708 Northbrooke Dr/ Tarpon Bay Blvd 2019 Background Count 860 Northbrooke Dr/Tarpon Bay Blvd 474 � 4 386 323 63 88 Immokalee Rd 3027A N 50 2553 4936 �W E 2,427 4230 1909 S 76 1677 Immokalee Rd 277 766 89 288 � I I -2 730 Northbrooke Dr / Tarpon Bay Blvd cuZo macKgrouna 1.6% 936 Northbrooke Dr / Tarpon Bay Blvd 507 � 4 429 345 68 94 Immokalee RdFIEIWLT ■ 3366A N 56 2837 5452 �W E 2696 � 4675 2086 S 85 1838 Immokalee Rd 316 � I I 519 835 Northb 3.2% 2040 Background 1.6% 1247 Northbrooke Dr/ Tarpon Bay Blvd 644 4 603 438 86 120 Immokalee Rd 4740 383 N 7547 2W E U3981 6473 2807 219 S 2492 Immokalee Rd 518 142A 167 424 827 1251 Northh 3.2% AM Peak Worst Case Volumes Immokalee Corridor Congestion Study Turning Movement Volumes N/S Roadway: Oakes Blvd E/W Roadway: Immokalee Rd Date Taken: 03/07/19 PSCF 0.97 2019 Background SF Adjustment 173 Oakes Blvd 1 �4 172 1 0 JE Immokalee Rd 2575 50 Nk274 26964225 =W 4289 1650 65 S1594 Immokalee Rd 0 0A 59 65 59 124 Oakes Blvd 2019 Background Count 178 Oakes Blvd 1 �4 177 1 0 0 Immokalee Rd 2655 52 N 125 2779 4356 1,582 W E 2,654 4422 1701 87 S 1643 Immokalee Rd 0 0A 61 67 � I I 61 128 Oakes Blvd 2025 Background 1.93% n199 Oakes Blvd 2 II 4 197 2 VVVO 0 Immokalee Rd 2951 58 N 139 3088 4842 1758 w E 2949 � 4921 1891 75 S 0 1833 Immokalee Rd 0 0A 75 75 Z II 75 150 Oakes 2040 Background 1.9% 279 Oakes Blvd 2 4 277 2 0 0 Immokalee Rd 4140 82 N 6794 2w E< U4333 6932 2654 105 S 2599 Immokalee Rd 0 105 0A 132 132 237 Oakes 3.9% AM Peak Worst Case Volumes Immokalee Corridor Congestion Study Turning Movement Volumes N/S Roadway: Valewood or E/W Roadway: Immokalee Rd Date Taken: 03/07/19 PSCF 0.97 2019 Background SF Adjustment 700 Valewood Dr 402 4 299 290 37 75 Immokalee Rd 27361=�� N U4111 2484 4321 W 0 E 3923 1585 8 1439 Immokalee Rd 30 49A 10 86 89 176 Valewood Dr 2019 Background Count 722 Valewood Dr 414 � 4 308 299 38 77 Immokalee Rd 2821 237 N 20 2561 4455 1,396 w E 2,491 4044 1634 1 S 50 1483 Immokalee Rd 31 511 10 89 � I I 92 181 Valewood Dr 2025 Background 1.6% 791 Valewood Dr 444 � 4 -7 320 41 83 Immokalee Rd 3125 264 N 23 2847 4942 1551 W E 2768 4493 1817 2 S 56 1646 Immokalee Rd 37 600 12 99 H 109 208 Val— 3.2% 2040 Background 1.6% 1060 Valewood Dr 562 4 498 405 52 105 Immokalee Rd 4347 370;VV N 32 3994 6896 2 777 E 3884 < 6295 2549 2S78 2301 2.3% Immokalee Rd 96A 19 132 173 305 Valewr 3.2% AM Peak Worst Case Volumes Immokalee Corridor Congestion Study Turning Movement Volumes N/S Roadway: Palazzo or E/W Roadway: Immokalee Rd Date Taken: 03/07/19 PSCF 0.97 2019 Background SF Adjustment 209 Palauo Dr 20 H 188 20 0 0 Immokalee Rd 2469 20 N 168 2611 3916 1427 W 0 E 2448 � 4043 1447 0 8 0 1427 Immokalee Rd 0 0 0A 0 0 Palauo Dr 2019 Background Count 215 Palauo Dr 21 H 194 21 0 0 Immokalee Rd 2545A N 173 2697 4037 �W E 2,124 4168 1492S 0 1471 Immokalee Rd 0 0A 0 0 �II 0 0 Palauo Dr 2025 Background 1.6% 244 Pal—o Dr 23 � 4 221 23 0 0 Immokalee Rd FIEIWLT 2885 24 N 197 3059 4577 1668 w E 2b62 � 4727 1692 0 S 0 1668 Immokalee Rd 0 00 A 0 �II 0 0 2040 Background 1.6% 355 Palauo Dr 29 4 326 28 0 0 Immokalee Rd 4257 36 N 290 4518 6757 2464 W E 4228 6982 2500 0 S 0 2464 Immokalee Rd 0 0A 0 0 �II 0 0 0.0% AM Peak Worst Case Volumes Immokalee Corridor Congestion Study Turning Movement Volumes N/S Roadway: Logan Blvd E/W Roadway: Immokalee Rd Date Taken: 03/07/19 PSCF 0.97 2019 Background SF Adjustment 832 Logan Blvd 487 4 345 231 134 122 Immokalee Rd 2660 167 N 105 2551 4154 1180 W 0 E 2211 3996 1494 147 s 243 1438 Immokalee Rd 218 74A 136 525 Z II 428 953 Logan Blvd 2019 Background Count 858 Logan Blvd 502 � 4 356 238 138 126 Immokalee Rd 2742 172 N 108 2638 4282 1,216 W E 2,279 4120 1540 152 S 251 1482 Immokalee Rd 225 766 140 541 -1 982 Logan Blvd 2025 Background 3.4% 1006 Logan Blvd 595 � 4 411 282 164 149 Immokalee Rd 3182 196 N 125 3048 4930 1378 W E 2633 4742 1748 1 33 S 290 1694 Immokalee Rd 267 900 166 627 Z II 523 1150 Logan 2040 Background 3.4% 1606 Logan Blvd 975 4 631 462 268 245 Immokalee Rd 4976 289 N 7557 2037 W E< U4720 7274 2581 2552554 Immokalee Rd 437 148A 272 972 857 1829 Logan 3.4% AM Peak Worst Case Volumes Immokalee Corridor Congestion Study Turning Movement Volumes N/S Roadway: Livingston Rd E/W Roadway: Immokalee Rd Date Taken: 03/07/19 PSCF 0.97 2019 Background SF Adjustment 3471 Livingston Rd 1831 4 1639 485 923 423 Immokalee Rd 1746 32 NN 480 1751 3892 1604 w E 1038 4208 2146 214 S 237 .13 Immokalee Rd 223 832A 426 1374 Z II 1481 2856 Livingston Rd 46800 79900 2019 Background Count 3578 Livingston Rd 1888 A 4 1690 500 952 436 Immokalee Rd 1800 337 N 495 1809 4012 1,654 w 0 E 1.070 4338 2212 221 s 244 2529 Immokalee Rd 230 8588 439 1417 g II 1527 2944 Livingston Rd ZUZO aacKgrouna 5.0% 4383 Livingston Rd 2458 4 1921 734 651 1239 568 Immokalee Rc 394 2123 381 N 559 2043 4624 1870 w E 1208 4985 2501 250 s 276 2942 Immokalee Rd 1765 g � 1753 3518 Livin{ 2040 Background 5.0% 7992 Livingston Rd • 5119 4 2873 1356 2581 1182 Immokalee Rd 3519 558 N *W2 2978 7187 274z W E 7669 3668 367 S 4691 44 Immokalee Rd 402 1499 767 3350 A � 2668 6018 Living: PM Peak Worst Case Volumes Immokalee Corridor Congestion Study Turning Movement Volumes N/S Roadway: Strand Blvd / Juliet Blvd E/W Roadway: Immokalee Rd Date Taken: 03/07/19 PSCF 0.97 50100 2019 Background SF Adjustment 887 Strand Blvd/ Juliet Blvd 515 4 372 261 32 222 Immokalee Rd 1836 185 N 162 1824 4511 2203 W 0 E 1137 4398 2675 287 S 225 2574 Immokalee Rd 139 24A 149 544 312 857 Strand Blvd / Juliet Blvd 48900 84600 2019 Background Count 914 Strand Blvd/ Juliet Blvd 531 � 4 383 269 33 229 Immokalee Rd 1893 191 N 1880 4651 2,271 W ) E 4534 U2321 2758 296 S 2654 Immokalee Rd 143 255 154 561 � I I 322 883 Strand Blvd/ Juliet Blvd 2025 Background 1.6 % 1004 Strand Blvd/ Juliet Blvd 569 4 431 288 36 245 Immokalee Rd 2127 216 N 189 2122 5240 2'63 W ) E 1671 5111 3113 334 S 262 2989 Immokalee Rd 168 300 181 632 � I I 379 1011 Strand 3.2% 2040 Background 1.6% 1358 Strand Blvd/Juliet Blvd 721 34 637 365 45 311 Immokalee Rd 3071 315 N 275 3095 7612 3738 W 0 E 2438 7432 4541 488 S 382 4337 ONImmokalee Rd 268 477 288 915 � I I 603 1518 Strand 3.2% PM Peak Worst Case Volumes Immokalee Corridor Congestion Study Turning Movement Volumes N/S Roadway: 1-75 SB Ramps E/W Roadway: Immokalee Rd Date Taken: 03/07/19 PSCF 0.97 47000 2019 Background SF Adjustment 1235 1-75 SB Ramps 1235 4 0 375 0 859 Immokalee Rd 1698 0 N 0 1475 4230 2143 W 0 E 1322 4478 2533 390 s 153 3002 Immokalee Rd 0 0A 0 543 0 543 I-75 SB Ramps 49800 77700 2019 Background Count 1273 1-75 SB Ramps 1273 A 4 0 387 0 886 Immokalee Rd 1750 0 N 0 1521 4361 2,209 W 0 E 1.363 4616 2611 402 s 158 3095 Immokalee Rd 0 0n 0 560 9 II 0 560 1-75 SB Ramps 2025 Background 3.0% 1473 1-75 SB Ramps 1473 A 4 0 448 0 1025 Immokalee Rd 11 1986 0 � N 0 1717 4933 2493 W E 1538 5235 2947 454 5 179 3518 Immokalee Rd 0 00 n 633 0 633 1-75 SE 2040 Background 3.0% 2283 1.75 SB Ramps 2283 4 0 694 0 1589 Immokalee Rd 2698 0 N 0 2237 6996 3636 W E 2004 7462 4298 662 S 233 5225 ONImmokalee Rd 0 0 0 895 �� 0 895 1.75 SE1r4% PM Peak Worst Case Volumes Immokalee Corridor Congestion Study Turning Movement Volumes N/S Roadway: 1-75 NB Ramps E/W Roadway: Immokalee Rd Date Taken: 03/07/19 PSCF 0.97 49600 2019 Background SF Adjustment n37 937 1-75 NB Ramps VVV 0 II 4 9 0 O 0 Immokalee Rd 1480I 338 1486.67 <W 0 E 1148 4155 2987 s 0 2669 Immokalee Rd 332 0A 282 0 Z II 614 614 1-75 NB Ramps 46200 77900 2019 Background Count 966 1-75 NB Ramps 0 A 4 966 0 0 0 Immokalee Rd 1526 618 N 348 1532 4605 2,461 W 0 E 1,184 4284 3079 0 s 0 2752 Immokalee Rd 342 0n 291 0 g II 633 633 1-75 NB Ramps 2025 Background 3.0% 1057 1-75 NB Ramps 0 A 4 1057 0 0 0 Immokalee Rd 1-0% 1712 676 N U1675 5077 2689 W E 4720 3365 0 s3045 Immokalee Rd 418 0356 n 0 774 774 1-75 NE PM Peak Worst Case Volumes Immokalee Corridor Congestion Study Turning Movement Volumes N/S Roadway: Northbrooke or / Tarpon Bay Blvd E/W Roadway: Immokalee Rd Date Taken: 03/07/19 PSCF 0.97 46400 2019 Background SF Adjustment 728 Northbrooke Dr/Tarpon Bay Blvd 364 � 4 364 161 65 138 Immokalee Rd 1463 249 N 13 1147 4174 2133 w o E 1048 3508 2711 329 S 86 2362 Immokalee Rd 254 1022 91 480 � I I -7 927 Northbrooke Dr / Tarpon Bay Blvd 39000 72300 ZD78 aaCkgrouna L ount 750 Northbrooke Dr / Tarpon Bay Blvd 375 A 4 375 166 6)k, Immokalee Rd 1508 257 1182 4303 2,199 W 3617 2795 339 2435 mmokalee Rd 262 1 495 g II 461 956 Northbrooke Dr / Tarpon Bay Blvd 2025 Background 1.6% 821 Northbrooke Dr/Tarpon Bay Blvd 402 44 419 178 72 152 Immokalee Rd 1665 281 N 15 1293 4719 2402 W E 1180 3957 3054 371 S 98 2664 Immokalee Rd 307 1233 110 541 g II 540 1081 Northh 3.2% 2040 Background 1.6% 1105 Northbrooke Dr / Tarpon Bay Blvd 509 g 4 596 225 91 193 Immokalee Rd 2399 378 N 21 1844 6508 3232 W E 1684 5445 4109 499 S 139 3601 Immokalee Rd 490 197 176 729 A � 863 1592 Northh 3.2% PM Peak Worst Case Volumes Immokalee Corridor Congestion Study Turning Movement Volumes N/S Roadway: Oakes Blvd E/W Roadway: Immokalee Rd Date Taken: 03/07/19 PSCF 0.97 39500 2019 Background SF Adjustment Oakes Blvd n119 22 4 97 22 0 0 Immokalee Rd 1188 25 N 1238 3557 � 2256 w E� 3606 U 2369 87 S 2369 Immokalee Rd 0 87 0A 113 � I I 113 200 Oakes Blvd 40100 63500 2019 Background Count 123 Oakes Blvd 23 V 100 23 0 0 Immokalee Rd 1225 26 N 74 1276 3667 � 2:6 W 0 E 1,202 3718 2442 90 s 2442 Immokalee Rd 0 0n 116 90 g I I 116 206 Oakes Blvd 2025 Background 1.9% 137 Oakes Blvd 25 A 4 112 25 0 0 Immokalee Rd 1361A2:.:4 N V�= 1419 4074 �W E 4145 2713 S2726 Immokalee Rd 0 0142 n 100 142 242 Oakes 2040 Background 1.9% 191 Oakes Blvd 34 4 157 34 0 0 Immokalee Rd 1908 41 N 116 1990 5716 3626 W E 1874 5866 3808 141 S 0 3876 EqImmokalee Rd 0 0 250 141 �� 250 391 Oakes % PM Peak Worst Case Volumes Immokalee Corridor Congestion Study Turning Movement Volumes N/S Roadway: Valewood or E/W Roadway: Immokalee Rd Date Taken: 03/07/19 PSCF 0.97 40300 2019 Background SF Adjustment 703 Valewood Dr 389 � 4 314 205 70 114 Immokalee Rd 1227 209 N 4 11125 3628 2184 W 0 E 986 3349 2401 8 S 36 2324 Immokalee Rd 37 10225 A 113 � II 164 277 Valewood Dr 37200 64500 2019 Background Count 725 Valewood Dr 401 A 4 324 211 72 118 Immokalee Rd 1265 215 N 4 1057 3740 2252 W 0 E 1,016 3453 2475 8 S 37 2396 Immokalee Rd 38 1055 26 117 H 169 286 Valewood Dr 2025 Background 1.6% 796 Valewood Dr 429 4 367 226 77 126 Immokalee Rd 14W 239 N 5 1176 4150 2502 W E 1129 3835 2750 9 S 42 2659 Immokalee Rd 45 1233 31 128 H 199 327 Valem 3.2% 2040 Background 1.6% 1084 Valewood Dr 544 g 4 540 286 98 160 Immokalee Rd 1941 336 N 7 1649 5801 35" W E 1584 5369 3860 13 S 58 3720 qqImmokalee Rd 71 197 49 169 A � 311 486 Vale- 3.2% PM Peak Worst Case Volumes Immokalee Corridor Congestion Study Turning Movement Volumes N/S Roadway: Palazzo or E/W Roadway: Immokalee Rd Date Taken: 03/07/19 PSCF 0.97 2019 Background SF Adjustment r�94 Pal— Dr 14 4 81 4 VVVO 0 Immokalee Rd 992 8 N 73 1051 3305 2305 W E 979 3356 2312 0 S 0 2305 Immokalee Rd 0 00 0 �II A 0 0 37300 63400 2019 Background Count 97 Palauo Dr 14 A 4 83 14 0 0 Immokalee Rd 1023 8 N 75 1084 3407 2,376 W 0 E 1,009 3460 2384 0 s 0 2376 Immokalee Rd 0 00 0 n 9 0 0 2025 Background 1.6% 111 Pal —Dr 15 4 96 15 0 0 Immokalee Rd I 1160 10 N 86 1231 3864 2694 W E 1145 3925 2704 0 5 0 2694 Immokalee Rd 0 00 n 0 9 0 0 3.2% 2040 Background 1.6% 159 Pala— Dr 19 4 140 19 0 0 Immokalee Rd 1709 14 N 126 1816 5703 3980 W E 1690 5796 3994 0 S 0 3980 EqImmokalee Rd 0 00 A 0 0 0 3.2% PM Peak Worst Case Volumes Immokalee Corridor Congestion Study Turning Movement Volumes N/S Roadway: Logan Blvd E/W Roadway: Immokalee Rd Date Taken: 03/07/19 PSCF 0.97 37700 2019 Background SF Adjustment 729 Logan Blvd 369 4 361 84 196 88 Immokalee Rd 1092 143 N 49 1251 3395 1923 W 0 E a. 3679 2303 238 S 346 2420 Immokalee Rd 144 170A 409 780 723 1503 Logan Blvd 40900 67000 2019 Background Count 752 Logan Blvd 380 A 4 372 87 202 91 Immokalee Rd 1126 147 N 50 1298 3500 1,882 W 0 E 891 3793 2374 245 s 357 2495 Immokalee Rd 148 1755 422 804 g II 745 1549 Logan Blvd 2025 Background 3.4% 881 Logan Blvd 450 A 4 431 103 239 1011 Immokalee Rd I3.0% 1290 167 N U571473 39832248 W E 4328 2693 278 S 2855 Immokalee Rd 176 2077 499 922 g II 882 1804 Logan 2040 Background 3.4% 1415 Logan Blvd 738 g 4 677 169 392 177 Immokalee Rd 2051 247 N 90 2323 6029 3320 W E 1594 6639 3978 411 S 639 4316 44 Immokalee Rd 288 340 819 1442 A � 1-7 2889 Logan PM Peak Worst Case Volumes Appendix C Synchro Reports Existing AM Lanes, Volumes, Timings 3: Livingston Rd & Immokalee Rd 1I06/30/2021 -11 --1. 4--- t Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations )) ttt r )) ttt r )) ttt r )) ttt r Traffic Volume (vph) 338 893 174 405 1878 396 301 544 348 430 808 527 Future Volume (vph) 338 893 174 405 1878 396 301 544 348 430 808 527 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 640 230 640 0 550 800 450 330 Storage Lanes 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.850 0.850 0.850 Fit Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 3433 5085 1583 3433 5085 1583 3433 5085 1583 3433 5085 1583 Fit Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd.Flow (perm) 3433 5085 1583 3433 5085 1583 3433 5085 1583 3433 5085 1583 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 181 218 255 241 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 45 45 Link Distance (ft) 1540 1911 886 1012 Travel Time (s) 23.3 29.0 13.4 15.3 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 367 971 189 440 2041 430 327 591 378 467 878 573 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 367 971 189 440 2041 430 327 591 378 467 878 573 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 24 24 24 24 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 Detector Template Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 20 100 20 20 100 20 20 100 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 20 6 20 20 6 20 20 6 20 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Protected Phases 1 6 5 2 7 4 3 8 Permitted Phases 6 2 4 8 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Existing AM Lanes, Volumes, Timings 3: Livingston Rd & Immokalee Rd 1I06/30/2021 -11 --1. 4--- t Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Detector Phase 1 6 6 5 2 2 7 4 4 3 8 8 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 12.6 61.6 61.6 12.6 64.6 64.6 12.5 33.0 33.0 12.5 38.0 38.0 Total Split (s) 33.0 80.0 80.0 36.0 83.0 83.0 26.0 33.0 33.0 31.0 38.0 38.0 Total Split (%) 18.3% 44.4% 44.4% 20.0% 46.1 % 46.1 % 14.4% 18.3% 18.3% 17.2% 21.1 % 21.1 % Maximum Green (s) 25.4 72.4 72.4 28.4 75.4 75.4 18.5 25.5 25.5 23.5 30.5 30.5 Yellow Time (s) 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 All -Red Time (s) 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 7.6 7.6 7.6 7.6 7.6 7.6 7.5 7.5 7.5 7.5 7.5 7.5 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lead Lead Lag Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None C-Max C-Max None C-Max C-Max None Max Max None Max Max Walk Time (s) 9.0 9.0 7.0 7.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 45.0 45.0 50.0 50.0 16.5 16.5 21.5 21.5 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Act Effct Green (s) 23.2 74.1 74.1 26.7 77.6 77.6 18.5 25.5 25.5 23.5 30.5 30.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.13 0.41 0.41 0.15 0.43 0.43 0.10 0.14 0.14 0.13 0.17 0.17 v/c Ratio 0.83 0.46 0.25 0.87 0.93 0.53 0.93 0.82 0.85 1.04 1.02 1.22 Control Delay 92.8 39.6 5.6 100.4 41.6 17.1 111.6 85.4 42.4 126.8 107.5 151.7 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 92.8 39.6 5.6 100.4 41.6 17.1 111.6 85.4 42.4 126.8 107.5 151.7 LOS F D A F D B F F D F F F Approach Delay 48.2 46.9 79.5 125.4 Approach LOS D D E F Intersection Summa Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 180 Actuated Cycle Length: 180 Offset: 126 (70%), Referenced to phase 2:WBT and 6:EBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 150 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.22 Intersection Signal Delay: 72.3 Intersection LOS: E Intersection Capacity Utilization 96.3% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 3: Livingston Rd & Immokalee Rd 01 0 04 3 05 t 6 J 08 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 2 Existing AM Lanes, Volumes, Timings 6: Juliet Blvd/Strand Blvd & Immokalee Rd 06/30/2021 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations )) ttt r )) ttt r t r Traffic Volume (vph) 212 1362 149 121 2292 262 147 26 91 113 17 207 Future Volume (vph) 212 1362 149 121 2292 262 147 26 91 113 17 207 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 300 440 500 0 0 125 0 0 Storage Lanes 2 1 2 1 2 1 1 0 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.850 0.850 0.861 Fit Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 3433 5085 1583 3433 5085 1583 3433 1863 1583 1770 1604 0 Fit Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 3433 5085 1583 3433 5085 1583 3433 1863 1583 1770 1604 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 162 193 192 174 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 1911 620 839 1009 Travel Time (s) 29.0 9.4 19.1 22.9 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 230 1480 162 132 2491 285 160 28 99 123 18 225 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 230 1480 162 132 2491 285 160 28 99 123 243 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 24 24 24 24 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 Detector Template Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 20 100 20 20 100 20 20 100 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 20 6 20 20 6 20 20 6 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Protected Phases 1 6 5 2 7 4 3 8 Permitted Phases 6 2 4 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Existing AM Lanes, Volumes, Timings 6: Juliet Blvd/Strand Blvd & Immokalee Rd 06/30/2021 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Detector Phase 1 6 6 5 2 2 7 4 4 3 8 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 11.8 43.8 43.8 11.8 43.8 43.8 12.1 23.0 23.0 12.1 34.0 Total Split (s) 31.0 102.0 102.0 21.0 92.0 92.0 23.0 23.0 23.0 34.0 34.0 Total Split (%) 17.2% 56.7% 56.7% 11.7% 51.1 % 51.1 % 12.8% 12.8% 12.8% 18.9% 18.9% Maximum Green (s) 24.2 95.2 95.2 14.2 85.2 85.2 15.9 15.9 15.9 26.9 26.9 Yellow Time (s) 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.4 4.4 4.4 4.4 4.4 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 7.1 7.1 7.1 7.1 7.1 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None C-Max C-Max None C-Max C-Max None Max Max None Max Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 30.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 8.9 8.9 19.9 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Act Effct Green (s) 17.3 97.4 97.4 12.0 92.1 92.1 13.4 25.0 25.0 17.8 29.4 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.10 0.54 0.54 0.07 0.51 0.51 0.07 0.14 0.14 0.10 0.16 v/c Ratio 0.70 0.54 0.17 0.58 0.96 0.32 0.63 0.11 0.26 0.70 0.60 Control Delay 84.7 18.8 1.6 107.1 34.3 2.7 91.7 71.9 1.6 99.0 27.4 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 84.7 18.8 1.6 107.1 34.3 2.7 91.7 71.9 1.6 99.0 27.4 LOS F B A F C A F E A F C Approach Delay 25.4 34.5 58.7 51.4 Approach LOS C C E D Intersection Summa Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 180 Actuated Cycle Length: 180 Offset: 117 (65%), Referenced to phase 2:WBT and 6:EBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 145 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.96 Intersection Signal Delay: 33.8 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 91.4% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 6: Juliet Blvd/Strand Blvd & Immokalee Rd 57 08 j Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 2 Existing AM Lanes, Volumes, Timings 10: Immokalee Rd & 1-75 SB Off Ramp 1I06/30/2021 -11 --1. 4--- t Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations fftff r tiff rr Traffic Volume (vph) 0 1271 305 469 2010 0 0 0 0 767 0 743 Future Volume (vph) 0 1271 305 469 2010 0 0 0 0 767 0 743 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 550 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 0 1 2 0 0 0 2 2 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.81 1.00 0.97 0.86 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.88 Frt 0.850 0.850 Fit Protected 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 7544 1583 3433 6408 0 0 0 0 3433 0 2787 Fit Permitted 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 7544 1583 3433 6408 0 0 0 0 3433 0 2787 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 332 159 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 553 554 371 730 Travel Time (s) 8.4 8.4 8.4 16.6 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 1382 332 510 2185 0 0 0 0 834 0 808 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 1382 332 510 2185 0 0 0 0 834 0 808 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Right Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 24 24 24 24 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 2 1 1 2 1 1 Detector Template Thru Right Left Thru Left Right Leading Detector (ft) 100 20 20 100 20 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 6 20 20 6 20 20 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 Turn Type NA Perm Prot NA Prot Prot Protected Phases 12 3 1 23 4 4 Permitted Phases 12 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Existing AM Lanes, Volumes, Timings 10: Immokalee Rd & 1-75 SB Off Ramp 06/30/2021 Lane Group 01 02 05 06 07 08 Laonfigurations Traffic Volume (vph) Future Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Storage Length (ft) Storage Lanes Taper Length (ft) Lane Util. Factor Frt Fit Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Fit Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Right Turn on Red Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) Link Distance (ft) Travel Time (s) Peak Hour Factor Adj. Flow (vph) Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) Enter Blocked Intersection Lane Alignment Median Width(ft) Link Offset(ft) Crosswalk Width(ft) Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor Turning Speed (mph) Number of Detectors Detector Template Leading Detector (ft) Trailing Detector (ft) Detector 1 Position(ft) Detector 1 Size(ft) Detector 1 Type Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) Detector 1 Queue (s) Detector 1 Delay (s) Detector 2 Position(ft) Detector 2 Size(ft) Detector 2 Type Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 2 Existing AM Lanes, Volumes, Timings 10: Immokalee Rd & 1-75 SB Off Ramp 06/30/2021 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Detector Phase 12 12 3 1 2 3 4 4 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 12.2 12.2 12.2 Total Split (s) 74.0 63.0 63.0 Total Split (%) 41.1% 35.0% 35.0% Maximum Green (s) 66.8 55.8 55.8 Yellow Time (s) 4.8 4.8 4.8 All -Red Time (s) 2.4 2.4 2.4 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 7.2 7.2 7.2 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode C-Max None None Walk Time (s) Flash Dont Walk (s) Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) Act Effct Green (s) 35.4 35.4 71.3 113.9 51.3 51.3 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.20 0.20 0.40 0.63 0.28 0.28 v/c Ratio 0.93 0.57 0.38 0.54 0.85 0.89 Control Delay 55.1 14.3 22.8 11.4 69.8 61.7 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.6 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 55.1 14.3 22.8 13.1 69.8 61.7 LOS E B C B E E Approach Delay 47.2 14.9 65.8 Approach LOS D B E Intersection Summa Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 180 Actuated Cycle Length: 180 Offset: 97 (54%), Referenced to phase 3:WBTL and 6:, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 140 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.15 Intersection Signal Delay: 37.9 Intersection LOS: D Intersection Capacity Utilization 106.0% ICU Level of Service G Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 10: Immokalee Rd & 1-75 SB Off Ramp =10 =10 10 =10 Cz �4 3'R'- �14 �14 �1.4 �14 07 05 06'R'- �38 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 3 Existing AM Lanes, Volumes, Timings 10: Immokalee Rd & 1-75 SB Off Ramp 06/30/2021 Lane Group 01 02 05 06 07 08 Detector Phase Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 12.6 29.2 12.6 12.2 38.2 12.2 Total Split (s) 13.0 30.0 13.0 52.0 80.0 35.0 Total Split (%) 7% 17% 7% 29% 44% 19% Maximum Green (s) 5.4 22.8 5.4 44.8 72.8 27.8 Yellow Time (s) 5.5 4.8 5.5 4.8 4.8 4.8 All -Red Time (s) 2.1 2.4 2.1 2.4 2.4 2.4 Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lag Lead Lag Lead Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None Max None C-Max None None Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 15.0 24.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 4 4 Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/C Ratio v/c Ratio Control Delay Queue Delay Total Delay LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS Intersection Summary Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 4 Existing AM Lanes, Volumes, Timings 14: 1-75 NB Off Ramp & Immokalee Rd 1I06/30/2021 -11 --1. 4--- t Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations tiff 6 r rr Traffic Volume (vph) 455 1618 0 0 2020 978 495 0 272 0 0 0 Future Volume (vph) 455 1618 0 0 2020 978 495 0 272 0 0 0 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 0 300 790 0 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 2 0 0 1 2 2 0 0 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.86 1.00 1.00 0.76 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.88 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.850 Fit Protected 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 3433 6408 0 0 8494 1583 3433 0 2787 0 0 0 Fit Permitted 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 3433 6408 0 0 8494 1583 3433 0 2787 0 0 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 425 159 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 554 1235 655 354 Travel Time (s) 8.4 18.7 14.9 8.0 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 495 1759 0 0 2196 1063 538 0 296 0 0 0 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 495 1759 0 0 2196 1063 538 0 296 0 0 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 24 24 24 24 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 2 1 1 1 Detector Template Left Thru Thru Right Left Right Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 100 20 20 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 6 20 20 20 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 Turn Type Prot NA NA Perm Prot Prot Protected Phases 7 567 56 8 8 Permitted Phases 56 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Existing AM Lanes, Volumes, Timings 14: 1-75 NB Off Ramp & Immokalee Rd 06/30/2021 Lane Group 01 02 03 04 05 06 Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) Future Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Storage Length (ft) Storage Lanes Taper Length (ft) Lane Util. Factor Frt Fit Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Fit Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Right Turn on Red Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) Link Distance (ft) Travel Time (s) Peak Hour Factor Adj. Flow (vph) Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) Enter Blocked Intersection Lane Alignment Median Width(ft) Link Offset(ft) Crosswalk Width(ft) Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor Turning Speed (mph) Number of Detectors Detector Template Leading Detector (ft) Trailing Detector (ft) Detector 1 Position(ft) Detector 1 Size(ft) Detector 1 Type Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) Detector 1 Queue (s) Detector 1 Delay (s) Detector 2 Position(ft) Detector 2 Size(ft) Detector 2 Type Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 2 Existing AM Lanes, Volumes, Timings 14: 1-75 NB Off Ramp & Immokalee Rd 06/30/2021 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Detector Phase 7 567 56 56 8 8 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 38.2 12.2 12.2 Total Split (s) 80.0 35.0 35.0 Total Split (%) 44.4% 19.4% 19.4% Maximum Green (s) 72.8 27.8 27.8 Yellow Time (s) 4.8 4.8 4.8 All -Red Time (s) 2.4 2.4 2.4 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 7.2 7.2 7.2 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None None None Walk Time (s) 7.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 24.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 4 Act Effct Green (s) 52.2 137.4 78.0 78.0 27.8 27.8 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.29 0.76 0.43 0.43 0.15 0.15 v/c Ratio 0.50 0.36 0.60 1.15 1.02 0.52 Control Delay 33.1 2.5 35.2 91.0 115.9 35.3 Queue Delay 0.0 0.9 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 33.1 3.4 35.2 91.0 115.9 35.3 LOS C A D F F D Approach Delay 10.0 53.4 87.3 Approach LOS A D F Intersection Summa Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 180 Actuated Cycle Length: 180 Offset: 97 (54%), Referenced to phase 3:WBTL and 6:, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 140 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.15 Intersection Signal Delay: 42.4 Intersection LOS: D Intersection Capacity Utilization 106.0% ICU Level of Service G Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 14: 1-75 NB Off Ramp & Immokalee Rd =10 =10 10 =10 10 �4 z �3'!' s =14 14 �1-4 �14 U05 U06 'R'- 38 80 s Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 3 Existing AM Lanes, Volumes, Timings 14: 1-75 NB Off Ramp & Immokalee Rd 06/30/2021 Lane Group 01 02 03 04 05 06 Detector Phase Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 12.6 29.2 12.2 12.2 12.6 12.2 Total Split (s) 13.0 30.0 74.0 63.0 13.0 52.0 Total Split (%) 7% 17% 41 % 35% 7% 29% Maximum Green (s) 5.4 22.8 66.8 55.8 5.4 44.8 Yellow Time (s) 5.5 4.8 4.8 4.8 5.5 4.8 All -Red Time (s) 2.1 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.1 2.4 Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Vehicle Extension (s) Recall Mode Walk Time (s) Flash Dont Walk (s) Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/C Ratio v/c Ratio Control Delay Queue Delay Total Delay LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS Intersection Summary Lag Lead Lead Yes Yes Yes 3.0 3.0 3.0 None Max C-Max 7.0 15.0 4 Lag Lag Lead Yes Yes Yes 3.0 3.0 3.0 None None C-Max Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 4 Existing AM Lanes, Volumes, Timings 18: Tarpon Bay Blvd/Northbrooke Dr & Immokalee Rd 1I06/30/2021 -11 --1. 4--- t Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations ) ttt r )) ttt r 4 r t r Traffic Volume (vph) 252 1455 145 74 2354 49 269 74 86 85 61 313 Future Volume (vph) 252 1455 145 74 2354 49 269 74 86 85 61 313 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 890 0 280 360 0 200 120 0 Storage Lanes 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.850 0.850 0.850 Fit Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.972 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 5085 1583 3433 5085 1583 1681 1720 1583 1770 1863 1583 Fit Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.972 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 5085 1583 3433 5085 1583 1681 1720 1583 1770 1863 1583 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 139 153 150 182 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 1235 815 578 628 Travel Time (s) 18.7 12.3 13.1 14.3 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 274 1582 158 80 2559 53 292 80 93 92 66 340 Shared Lane Traffic (%) 37% Lane Group Flow (vph) 274 1582 158 80 2559 53 184 188 93 92 66 340 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 24 24 12 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 Detector Template Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 20 100 20 20 100 20 20 100 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 20 6 20 20 6 20 20 6 20 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Split NA Perm Split NA Perm Protected Phases 1 6 5 2 4 4 8 8 Permitted Phases 6 2 4 8 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Existing AM Lanes, Volumes, Timings 18: Tarpon Bay Blvd/Northbrooke Dr & Immokalee Rd 06/30/2021 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Detector Phase 1 6 6 5 2 2 4 4 4 8 8 8 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 11.8 43.8 43.8 11.8 38.8 38.8 12.3 12.3 12.3 12.3 12.3 12.3 Total Split (s) 35.0 109.0 109.0 25.0 99.0 99.0 24.0 24.0 24.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 Total Split (%) 19.4% 60.6% 60.6% 13.9% 55.0% 55.0% 13.3% 13.3% 13.3% 12.2% 12.2% 12.2% Maximum Green (s) 28.2 102.2 102.2 18.2 92.2 92.2 16.7 16.7 16.7 14.7 14.7 14.7 Yellow Time (s) 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 7.3 7.3 7.3 7.3 7.3 7.3 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None C-Max C-Max None C-Max C-Max None None None None None None Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 30.0 30.0 25.0 25.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 Act Effct Green (s) 28.2 110.8 110.8 9.6 92.2 92.2 16.7 16.7 16.7 14.7 14.7 14.7 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.16 0.62 0.62 0.05 0.51 0.51 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.08 0.08 0.08 v/c Ratio 0.99 0.51 0.15 0.44 0.98 0.06 1.19 1.18 0.33 0.64 0.43 1.15 Control Delay 107.5 19.0 3.5 95.2 16.6 0.0 196.0 193.7 3.1 100.3 88.2 128.8 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 107.5 19.0 3.5 95.2 16.6 0.0 196.0 193.7 3.1 100.3 88.2 128.8 LOS F B A F B A F F A F F F Approach Delay 29.8 18.6 156.5 118.1 Approach LOS C B F F Intersection Summa Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 180 Actuated Cycle Length: 180 Offset: 59 (33%), Referenced to phase 2:WBT and 6:EBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 125 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.19 Intersection Signal Delay: 42.6 Intersection LOS: D Intersection Capacity Utilization 92.9% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 18: Tarpon Bay Blvd/Northbrooke Dr & Immokalee Rd 1z438 0 5 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 2 Existing AM Lanes, Volumes, Timings 24: Valewood Dr & Immokalee Rd 06/30/2021 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations ) ttt r ) ttt r r Traffic Volume (vph) 230 1354 1 49 2416 19 30 49 10 75 37 290 Future Volume (vph) 230 1354 1 49 2416 19 30 49 10 75 37 290 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 280 185 540 300 0 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.850 0.974 0.850 Fit Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.967 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 5085 1583 1770 5085 1583 1770 1814 0 0 1801 1583 Fit Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.967 Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 5085 1583 1770 5085 1583 1770 1814 0 0 1801 1583 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 116 158 5 242 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 620 977 513 541 Travel Time (s) 9.4 14.8 11.7 12.3 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 250 1472 1 53 2626 21 33 53 11 82 40 315 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 250 1472 1 53 2626 21 33 64 0 0 122 315 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 12 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 2 1 Detector Template Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Left Thru Right Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 20 100 20 20 100 20 100 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 20 6 20 20 6 20 6 20 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA custom NA Perm Protected Phases 1 6 5 2 7 4! 8! 8 Permitted Phases 6 2 8 8 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Existing AM Lanes, Volumes, Timings 24: Valewood Dr & Immokalee Rd 06/30/2021 -11 � � t t Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Detector Phase 1 6 6 5 2 2 7 4 8 8 8 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 12.0 52.0 52.0 12.0 38.0 38.0 12.1 45.0 13.0 13.0 13.0 Total Split (s) 38.0 118.0 118.0 17.0 97.0 97.0 15.0 45.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 Total Split (%) 21.1% 65.6% 65.6% 9.4% 53.9% 53.9% 8.3% 25.0% 16.7% 16.7% 16.7% Maximum Green (s) 31.0 111.0 111.0 10.0 90.0 90.0 7.9 37.9 22.0 22.0 22.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.3 2.3 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.1 7.1 8.0 8.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None C-Max C-Max None C-Max C-Max None Max None None None Walk Time (s) 9.0 9.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 36.0 36.0 24.0 24.0 30.9 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 Act Effct Green (s) 28.6 114.6 114.6 9.1 92.4 92.4 7.3 37.9 25.1 25.1 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.16 0.64 0.64 0.05 0.51 0.51 0.04 0.21 0.14 0.14 v/c Ratio 0.89 0.45 0.00 0.60 1.01 0.02 0.46 0.17 0.49 0.74 Control Delay 126.5 2.7 0.0 116.0 38.5 0.0 104.5 54.9 80.4 29.7 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 126.5 2.7 0.0 116.0 38.5 0.0 104.5 54.9 80.4 29.7 LOS F A A F D A F D F C Approach Delay 20.7 39.7 71.8 43.8 Approach LOS C D E D Intersection Summa Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 180 Actuated Cycle Length: 180 Offset: 45 (25%), Referenced to phase 2:WBT and 6:EBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 150 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.01 Intersection Signal Delay: 34.1 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 90.5% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 ! Phase conflict between lane groups. Splits and Phases: 24: Valewood Dr & Immokalee Rd 01 02 04 o5 6 "07O8 En Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 2 Existing AM Lanes, Volumes, Timings 29: Logan Blvd & Immokalee Rd 1I06/30/2021 -11 --1. 4--- t Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations )) ttt r )) ttt r tt r t r Traffic Volume (vph) 167 1180 147 243 2211 105 218 74 136 122 134 231 Future Volume (vph) 167 1180 147 243 2211 105 218 74 136 122 134 231 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 360 260 440 190 480 320 290 0 Storage Lanes 2 1 2 1 2 1 1 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.850 0.850 0.850 Fit Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 3433 5085 1583 3433 5085 1583 3433 3539 1583 1770 1863 1583 Fit Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 3433 5085 1583 3433 5085 1583 3433 3539 1583 1770 1863 1583 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 150 116 148 204 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 45 45 Link Distance (ft) 2991 1516 593 587 Travel Time (s) 45.3 23.0 9.0 8.9 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 182 1283 160 264 2403 114 237 80 148 133 146 251 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 182 1283 160 264 2403 114 237 80 148 133 146 251 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 24 24 24 24 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 Detector Template Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 20 100 20 20 100 20 20 100 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 20 6 20 20 6 20 20 6 20 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Protected Phases 1 6 5 2 7 4 3 8 Permitted Phases 6 2 4 8 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 29: Logan Blvd & Immokalee Rd Existing AM -11 --1. 4--- t 1I06/30/2021 t Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Detector Phase 1 6 6 5 2 2 7 4 4 3 8 8 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 12.0 52.0 52.0 12.0 38.0 38.0 12.1 26.0 26.0 13.0 28.0 28.0 Total Split (s) 30.0 94.0 94.0 30.0 94.0 94.0 28.0 26.0 26.0 30.0 28.0 28.0 Total Split (%) 16.7% 52.2% 52.2% 16.7% 52.2% 52.2% 15.6% 14.4% 14.4% 16.7% 15.6% 15.6% Maximum Green (s) 23.0 87.0 87.0 23.0 87.0 87.0 20.9 18.9 18.9 22.0 20.0 20.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.3 2.3 2.3 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.1 7.1 7.1 8.0 8.0 8.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None C-Max C-Max None C-Max C-Max None Max Max None Max Max Walk Time (s) 9.0 9.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 10.0 10.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 36.0 36.0 24.0 24.0 11.9 11.9 10.0 10.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Act Effct Green (s) 14.9 91.1 91.1 18.9 95.1 95.1 17.4 22.8 22.8 18.1 23.5 23.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.08 0.51 0.51 0.10 0.53 0.53 0.10 0.13 0.13 0.10 0.13 0.13 v/c Ratio 0.64 0.50 0.18 0.73 0.89 0.13 0.72 0.18 0.45 0.75 0.60 0.66 Control Delay 90.4 35.1 9.0 90.2 43.5 3.5 91.0 72.9 14.4 103.1 85.7 25.3 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 90.4 35.1 9.0 90.2 43.5 3.5 91.0 72.9 14.4 103.1 85.7 25.3 LOS F D A F D A F E B F F C Approach Delay 38.7 46.3 63.5 61.4 Approach LOS D D E E Intersection Summa Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 180 Actuated Cycle Length: 180 Offset: 163 (91 %), Referenced to phase 2:WBT and 6:EBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 115 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.89 Intersection Signal Delay: 47.0 Intersection LOS: D Intersection Capacity Utilization 85.0% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 29: Logan Blvd & Immokalee Rd \10- 01 02 3 05 --1"06 07 7 08 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 2 Existing PM Lanes, Volumes, Timings 3: Livingston Rd & Immokalee Rd 1I06/30/2021 -11 --1. 4--- t Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations )) ttt r )) ttt r )) ttt r )) ttt r Traffic Volume (vph) 327 1604 214 237 1038 480 223 832 426 423 923 485 Future Volume (vph) 327 1604 214 237 1038 480 223 832 426 423 923 485 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 640 230 640 0 550 800 450 330 Storage Lanes 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.850 0.850 0.850 Fit Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 3433 5085 1583 3433 5085 1583 3433 5085 1583 3433 5085 1583 Fit Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd.Flow (perm) 3433 5085 1583 3433 5085 1583 3433 5085 1583 3433 5085 1583 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 164 389 192 221 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 45 45 Link Distance (ft) 1540 1911 886 1012 Travel Time (s) 23.3 29.0 13.4 15.3 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 355 1743 233 258 1128 522 242 904 463 460 1003 527 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 355 1743 233 258 1128 522 242 904 463 460 1003 527 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 24 24 24 24 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 Detector Template Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 20 100 20 20 100 20 20 100 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 20 6 20 20 6 20 20 6 20 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Protected Phases 1 6 5 2 7 4 3 8 Permitted Phases 6 2 4 8 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Existing PM Lanes, Volumes, Timings 3: Livingston Rd & Immokalee Rd 06/30/2021 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Detector Phase 1 6 6 5 2 2 7 4 4 3 8 8 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 12.6 61.6 61.6 12.6 64.6 64.6 12.5 35.0 35.0 12.5 40.0 40.0 Total Split (s) 32.0 88.0 88.0 28.0 84.0 84.0 24.0 35.0 35.0 29.0 40.0 40.0 Total Split (%) 17.8% 48.9% 48.9% 15.6% 46.7% 46.7% 13.3% 19.4% 19.4% 16.1 % 22.2% 22.2% Maximum Green (s) 24.4 80.4 80.4 20.4 76.4 76.4 16.5 27.5 27.5 21.5 32.5 32.5 Yellow Time (s) 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 All -Red Time (s) 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 7.6 7.6 7.6 7.6 7.6 7.6 7.5 7.5 7.5 7.5 7.5 7.5 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lead Lead Lag Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None C-Max C-Max None C-Max C-Max None Max Max None None None Walk Time (s) 9.0 9.0 7.0 7.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 45.0 45.0 50.0 50.0 18.5 18.5 23.5 23.5 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Act Effct Green (s) 22.5 82.7 82.7 18.1 78.3 78.3 15.9 27.5 27.5 21.5 33.1 33.1 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.12 0.46 0.46 0.10 0.44 0.44 0.09 0.15 0.15 0.12 0.18 0.18 v/c Ratio 0.83 0.75 0.29 0.75 0.51 0.57 0.80 1.16 1.15 1.12 1.07 1.12 Control Delay 93.6 42.8 10.1 99.4 26.7 6.2 100.0 151.2 127.5 149.9 117.3 114.2 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 93.6 42.8 10.1 99.4 26.7 6.2 100.0 151.2 127.5 149.9 117.3 114.2 LOS F D B F C A F F F F F F Approach Delay 47.3 31.0 136.7 124.0 Approach LOS D C F F Intersection Summa Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 180 Actuated Cycle Length: 180 Offset: 176 (98%), Referenced to phase 2:WBT and 6:EBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 150 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.16 Intersection Signal Delay: 81.1 Intersection LOS: F Intersection Capacity Utilization 91.1 % ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 3: Livingston Rd & Immokalee Rd 13 5 6J 7 •38 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 2 Existing PM Lanes, Volumes, Timings 6: Juliet Blvd/Strand Blvd & Immokalee Rd 06/30/2021 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations )) ttt r )) ttt r t r Traffic Volume (vph) 185 2203 287 225 1437 162 139 24 149 222 32 261 Future Volume (vph) 185 2203 287 225 1437 162 139 24 149 222 32 261 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 300 440 500 0 0 125 0 0 Storage Lanes 2 1 2 1 2 1 1 0 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.850 0.850 0.866 Fit Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 3433 5085 1583 3433 5085 1583 3433 1863 1583 1770 1613 0 Fit Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 3433 5085 1583 3433 5085 1583 3433 1863 1583 1770 1613 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 302 152 151 155 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 1911 620 839 1009 Travel Time (s) 29.0 9.4 19.1 22.9 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 201 2395 312 245 1562 176 151 26 162 241 35 284 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 201 2395 312 245 1562 176 151 26 162 241 319 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 24 24 24 24 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 Detector Template Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 20 100 20 20 100 20 20 100 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 20 6 20 20 6 20 20 6 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Protected Phases 1 6 5 2 7 4 3 8 Permitted Phases 6 2 4 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Existing PM Lanes, Volumes, Timings 6: Juliet Blvd/Strand Blvd & Immokalee Rd 06/30/2021 -11 � � t t Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Detector Phase 1 6 6 5 2 2 7 4 4 3 8 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 11.8 43.8 43.8 11.8 43.8 43.8 12.1 14.0 14.0 12.1 32.0 Total Split (s) 27.0 108.0 108.0 22.0 103.0 103.0 18.0 14.0 14.0 36.0 32.0 Total Split (%) 15.0% 60.0% 60.0% 12.2% 57.2% 57.2% 10.0% 7.8% 7.8% 20.0% 17.8% Maximum Green (s) 20.2 101.2 101.2 15.2 96.2 96.2 10.9 11.0 11.0 28.9 24.9 Yellow Time (s) 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.4 2.0 2.0 4.4 4.4 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.7 1.0 1.0 2.7 2.7 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 7.1 3.0 3.0 7.1 7.1 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None C-Max C-Max None C-Max C-Max None None None None Max Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 30.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 4.0 4.0 17.9 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Act Effct Green (s) 15.8 101.6 101.6 15.0 100.8 100.8 10.7 12.5 12.5 27.2 24.9 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.09 0.56 0.56 0.08 0.56 0.56 0.06 0.07 0.07 0.15 0.14 v/c Ratio 0.67 0.83 0.30 0.86 0.55 0.18 0.74 0.20 0.65 0.90 0.90 Control Delay 92.0 22.5 1.6 116.2 6.6 1.1 104.8 84.4 26.3 108.8 65.7 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 92.0 22.5 1.6 116.2 6.6 1.1 104.8 84.4 26.3 108.8 65.7 LOS F C A F A A F F C F E Approach Delay 25.1 19.7 65.7 84.2 Approach LOS C B E F Intersection Summa Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 180 Actuated Cycle Length: 180 Offset: 156 (87%), Referenced to phase 2:WBT and 6:EBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 130 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.90 Intersection Signal Delay: 31.3 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 91.5% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 6: Juliet Blvd/Strand Blvd & Immokalee Rd 1 0 O3 04 5 6 07 T8 0"� Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 2 Existing PM Lanes, Volumes, Timings 10: Immokalee Rd & 1-75 SB Off Ramp 1I06/30/2021 -11 --1. 4--- t Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations fftff r tiff rr Traffic Volume (vph) 0 2143 390 153 1322 0 0 0 0 858 0 375 Future Volume (vph) 0 2143 390 153 1322 0 0 0 0 858 0 375 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 550 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 0 1 2 0 0 0 2 2 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.81 1.00 0.97 0.86 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.88 Frt 0.850 0.850 Fit Protected 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 7544 1583 3433 6408 0 0 0 0 3433 0 2787 Fit Permitted 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 7544 1583 3433 6408 0 0 0 0 3433 0 2787 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 424 159 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 553 554 371 730 Travel Time (s) 8.4 8.4 8.4 16.6 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 2329 424 166 1437 0 0 0 0 933 0 408 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 2329 424 166 1437 0 0 0 0 933 0 408 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Right Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 24 24 24 24 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 2 1 1 2 1 1 Detector Template Thru Right Left Thru Left Right Leading Detector (ft) 100 20 20 100 20 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 6 20 20 6 20 20 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 Turn Type NA Perm Prot NA Prot Prot Protected Phases 12 3 1 23 4 4 Permitted Phases 12 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Existing PM Lanes, Volumes, Timings 10: Immokalee Rd & 1-75 SB Off Ramp 06/30/2021 Lane Group 01 02 05 06 07 08 Laonfigurations Traffic Volume (vph) Future Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Storage Length (ft) Storage Lanes Taper Length (ft) Lane Util. Factor Frt Fit Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Fit Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Right Turn on Red Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) Link Distance (ft) Travel Time (s) Peak Hour Factor Adj. Flow (vph) Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) Enter Blocked Intersection Lane Alignment Median Width(ft) Link Offset(ft) Crosswalk Width(ft) Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor Turning Speed (mph) Number of Detectors Detector Template Leading Detector (ft) Trailing Detector (ft) Detector 1 Position(ft) Detector 1 Size(ft) Detector 1 Type Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) Detector 1 Queue (s) Detector 1 Delay (s) Detector 2 Position(ft) Detector 2 Size(ft) Detector 2 Type Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 2 Existing PM Lanes, Volumes, Timings 10: Immokalee Rd & 1-75 SB Off Ramp 06/30/2021 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Detector Phase 12 12 3 1 2 3 4 4 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 12.2 12.2 12.2 Total Split (s) 48.0 64.0 64.0 Total Split (%) 26.7% 35.6% 35.6% Maximum Green (s) 40.8 56.8 56.8 Yellow Time (s) 4.8 4.8 4.8 All -Red Time (s) 2.4 2.4 2.4 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 7.2 7.2 7.2 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode Max None None Walk Time (s) Flash Dont Walk (s) Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) Act Effct Green (s) 60.4 60.4 40.8 108.4 56.8 56.8 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.34 0.34 0.23 0.60 0.32 0.32 v/c Ratio 0.92 0.52 0.21 0.37 0.86 0.41 Control Delay 43.7 8.2 30.6 5.2 67.2 30.0 Queue Delay 0.9 0.0 0.0 1.2 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 44.5 8.2 30.6 6.4 67.2 30.0 LOS D A C A E C Approach Delay 38.9 8.9 55.9 Approach LOS D A E Intersection Summa Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 180 Actuated Cycle Length: 180 Offset: 52 (29%), Referenced to phase 2:EBWB and 7:, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 100 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.92 Intersection Signal Delay: 34.5 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 72.0% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 10: Immokalee Rd & 1-75 SB Off Ramp =10 =10 �10 =10 02 04 03 �14 �14 �14 =14 .400 7 5 6 .4wi8 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 3 Existing PM Lanes, Volumes, Timings 10: Immokalee Rd & 1-75 SB Off Ramp 06/30/2021 Lane Group 01 02 05 06 07 08 Detector Phase Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 12.6 38.2 12.6 12.2 38.2 12.2 Total Split (s) 13.0 55.0 13.0 33.0 106.0 28.0 Total Split (%) 7% 31% 7% 18% 59% 16% Maximum Green (s) 5.4 47.8 5.4 25.8 98.8 20.8 Yellow Time (s) 5.5 4.8 5.5 4.8 4.8 4.8 All -Red Time (s) 2.1 2.4 2.1 2.4 2.4 2.4 Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lag Lead Lag Lead Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None C-Max None None C-Max None Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 24.0 24.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/C Ratio v/c Ratio Control Delay Queue Delay Total Delay LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS Intersection Summary Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 4 Existing PM Lanes, Volumes, Timings 14: 1-75 NB Off Ramp & Immokalee Rd 1I06/30/2021 -11 --1. 4--- t Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations tiff 6 r rr Traffic Volume (vph) 599 2387 0 0 1148 338 332 0 282 0 0 0 Future Volume (vph) 599 2387 0 0 1148 338 332 0 282 0 0 0 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 0 300 790 0 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 2 0 0 1 2 2 0 0 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.86 1.00 1.00 0.76 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.88 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.850 Fit Protected 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 3433 6408 0 0 8494 1583 3433 0 2787 0 0 0 Fit Permitted 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 3433 6408 0 0 8494 1583 3433 0 2787 0 0 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 340 159 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 554 1235 655 354 Travel Time (s) 8.4 18.7 14.9 8.0 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 651 2595 0 0 1248 367 361 0 307 0 0 0 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 651 2595 0 0 1248 367 361 0 307 0 0 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 24 24 24 24 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 2 1 1 1 Detector Template Left Thru Thru Right Left Right Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 100 20 20 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 6 20 20 20 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 Turn Type Prot NA NA Perm Prot Prot Protected Phases 7 567 56 8 8 Permitted Phases 56 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Existing PM Lanes, Volumes, Timings 14: 1-75 NB Off Ramp & Immokalee Rd 06/30/2021 Lane Group 01 02 03 04 05 06 Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) Future Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Storage Length (ft) Storage Lanes Taper Length (ft) Lane Util. Factor Frt Fit Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Fit Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Right Turn on Red Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) Link Distance (ft) Travel Time (s) Peak Hour Factor Adj. Flow (vph) Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) Enter Blocked Intersection Lane Alignment Median Width(ft) Link Offset(ft) Crosswalk Width(ft) Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor Turning Speed (mph) Number of Detectors Detector Template Leading Detector (ft) Trailing Detector (ft) Detector 1 Position(ft) Detector 1 Size(ft) Detector 1 Type Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) Detector 1 Queue (s) Detector 1 Delay (s) Detector 2 Position(ft) Detector 2 Size(ft) Detector 2 Type Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 2 Existing PM Lanes, Volumes, Timings 14: 1-75 NB Off Ramp & Immokalee Rd 06/30/2021 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Detector Phase 7 567 56 56 8 8 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 38.2 12.2 12.2 Total Split (s) 106.0 28.0 28.0 Total Split (%) 58.9% 15.6% 15.6% Maximum Green (s) 98.8 20.8 20.8 Yellow Time (s) 4.8 4.8 4.8 All -Red Time (s) 2.4 2.4 2.4 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 7.2 7.2 7.2 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode C-Max None None Walk Time (s) 7.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 24.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 Act Effct Green (s) 98.8 144.4 38.4 38.4 20.8 20.8 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.55 0.80 0.21 0.21 0.12 0.12 v/c Ratio 0.35 0.50 0.69 0.61 0.91 0.66 Control Delay 6.7 2.3 44.9 13.1 105.3 43.8 Queue Delay 0.8 2.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 7.5 4.5 44.9 13.1 105.3 43.8 LOS A A D B F D Approach Delay 5.1 37.7 77.0 Approach LOS A D E Intersection Summa Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 180 Actuated Cycle Length: 180 Offset: 52 (29%), Referenced to phase 2:EBWB and 7:, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 100 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.92 Intersection Signal Delay: 23.3 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 72.0% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 14: 1-75 NB Off Ramp & Immokalee Rd =10 =10 =10 =10 02 04 03 �14 �1 �1 �14 '400J 5 6 �8 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 3 Existing PM Lanes, Volumes, Timings 14: 1-75 NB Off Ramp & Immokalee Rd 06/30/2021 Lane Group 01 02 03 04 05 06 Detector Phase Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 12.6 38.2 12.2 12.2 12.6 12.2 Total Split (s) 13.0 55.0 48.0 64.0 13.0 33.0 Total Split (%) 7% 31% 27% 36% 7% 18% Maximum Green (s) 5.4 47.8 40.8 56.8 5.4 25.8 Yellow Time (s) 5.5 4.8 4.8 4.8 5.5 4.8 All -Red Time (s) 2.1 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.1 2.4 Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lag Lead Lead Lag Lag Lead Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None C-Max Max None None None Walk Time (s) 7.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 24.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/C Ratio v/c Ratio Control Delay Queue Delay Total Delay LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS Intersection Summary Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 4 Existing PM Lanes, Volumes, Timings 18: Tarpon Bay Blvd/Northbrooke Dr & Immokalee Rd 1I06/30/2021 -11 --1. 4--- t Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations ) ttt r )) ttt r 4 r t r Traffic Volume (vph) 249 2133 329 86 1048 13 254 102 91 138 65 161 Future Volume (vph) 249 2133 329 86 1048 13 254 102 91 138 65 161 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 890 0 280 360 0 200 120 0 Storage Lanes 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.850 0.850 0.850 Fit Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.979 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 5085 1583 3433 5085 1583 1681 1732 1583 1770 1863 1583 Fit Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.979 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 5085 1583 3433 5085 1583 1681 1732 1583 1770 1863 1583 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 215 153 150 175 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 1235 815 578 628 Travel Time (s) 18.7 12.3 13.1 14.3 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 271 2318 358 93 1139 14 276 111 99 150 71 175 Shared Lane Traffic (%) 31 % Lane Group Flow (vph) 271 2318 358 93 1139 14 190 197 99 150 71 175 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 24 24 12 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 Detector Template Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 20 100 20 20 100 20 20 100 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 20 6 20 20 6 20 20 6 20 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Split NA Perm Split NA Perm Protected Phases 1 6 5 2 4 4 8 8 Permitted Phases 6 2 4 8 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Existing PM Lanes, Volumes, Timings 18: Tarpon Bay Blvd/Northbrooke Dr & Immokalee Rd 06/30/2021 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Detector Phase 1 6 6 5 2 2 4 4 4 8 8 8 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 11.8 43.8 43.8 11.8 38.8 38.8 30.0 30.0 30.0 23.0 23.0 23.0 Total Split (s) 43.0 109.0 109.0 18.0 84.0 84.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 23.0 23.0 23.0 Total Split (%) 23.9% 60.6% 60.6% 10.0% 46.7% 46.7% 16.7% 16.7% 16.7% 12.8% 12.8% 12.8% Maximum Green (s) 36.2 102.2 102.2 11.2 77.2 77.2 22.7 22.7 22.7 15.7 15.7 15.7 Yellow Time (s) 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 7.3 7.3 7.3 7.3 7.3 7.3 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None C-Max C-Max None C-Max C-Max Max Max Max Max Max Max Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 30.0 30.0 25.0 25.0 15.7 15.7 15.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Act Effct Green (s) 31.6 103.6 103.6 9.8 81.8 81.8 22.7 22.7 22.7 15.7 15.7 15.7 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.18 0.58 0.58 0.05 0.45 0.45 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.09 0.09 0.09 v/c Ratio 0.87 0.79 0.36 0.50 0.49 0.02 0.90 0.90 0.30 0.97 0.44 0.59 Control Delay 126.3 15.3 1.9 87.8 19.9 0.0 116.5 116.2 3.2 144.7 87.0 17.9 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 126.3 15.3 1.9 87.8 19.9 0.0 116.5 116.2 3.2 144.7 87.0 17.9 LOS F B A F B A F F A F F B Approach Delay 23.9 24.8 93.3 78.3 Approach LOS C C F E Intersection Summa Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 180 Actuated Cycle Length: 180 Offset: 86 (48%), Referenced to phase 2:WBT and 6:EBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 130 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.97 Intersection Signal Delay: 35.0 Intersection LOS: D Intersection Capacity Utilization 79.2% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 18: Tarpon Bay Blvd/Northbrooke Dr & Immokalee Rd 1 02 04 o8 5 7:_ 06 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 2 Existing PM Lanes, Volumes, Timings 24: Valewood Dr & Immokalee Rd 06/30/2021 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations ) ttt r ) ttt r r Traffic Volume (vph) 209 2184 8 36 986 4 37 102 25 114 70 205 Future Volume (vph) 209 2184 8 36 986 4 37 102 25 114 70 205 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 280 185 540 300 0 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.850 0.971 0.850 Fit Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.970 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 5085 1583 1770 5085 1583 1770 1809 0 0 1807 1583 Fit Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.970 Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 5085 1583 1770 5085 1583 1770 1809 0 0 1807 1583 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 118 161 7 221 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 620 977 513 541 Travel Time (s) 9.4 14.8 11.7 12.3 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 227 2374 9 39 1072 4 40 111 27 124 76 223 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 227 2374 9 39 1072 4 40 138 0 0 200 223 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 12 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 2 1 Detector Template Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Left Thru Right Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 20 100 20 20 100 20 100 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 20 6 20 20 6 20 6 20 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA custom NA Perm Protected Phases 1 6 5 2 7 4! 8! 8 Permitted Phases 6 2 8 8 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 24: Valewood Dr & Immokalee Rd Existing PM -11 --1. 4--- t 1I06/30/2021 t Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Detector Phase 1 6 6 5 2 2 7 4 8 8 8 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 12.1 34.1 34.1 12.1 12.1 12.1 12.7 48.7 12.7 12.7 12.7 Total Split (s) 30.0 103.0 103.0 19.0 92.0 92.0 15.0 58.0 43.0 43.0 43.0 Total Split (%) 16.7% 57.2% 57.2% 10.6% 51.1 % 51.1 % 8.3% 32.2% 23.9% 23.9% 23.9% Maximum Green (s) 22.9 95.9 95.9 11.9 84.9 84.9 7.3 50.3 35.3 35.3 35.3 Yellow Time (s) 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.4 4.4 4.4 4.4 4.4 All -Red Time (s) 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 7.1 7.1 7.1 7.1 7.1 7.1 7.7 7.7 7.7 7.7 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None C-Max C-Max None C-Max C-Max None Max Max Max Max Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 0.0 0.0 7.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 20.0 20.0 0.0 0.0 34.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Act Effct Green (s) 22.9 101.2 101.2 9.2 84.9 84.9 7.0 50.3 38.3 38.3 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.13 0.56 0.56 0.05 0.47 0.47 0.04 0.28 0.21 0.21 v/c Ratio 1.01 0.83 0.01 0.43 0.45 0.00 0.58 0.27 0.52 0.44 Control Delay 148.2 13.6 0.0 83.5 41.0 0.0 116.2 49.6 69.6 9.7 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 148.2 13.6 0.0 83.5 41.0 0.0 116.2 49.6 69.6 9.7 LOS F B A F D A F D E A Approach Delay 25.3 42.3 64.6 38.0 Approach LOS C D E D Intersection Summa Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 180 Actuated Cycle Length: 180 Offset: 101 (56%), Referenced to phase 2:WBT and 6:EBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 125 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.01 Intersection Signal Delay: 32.5 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 87.9% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 ! Phase conflict between lane groups. Splits and Phases: 24: Valewood Dr & Immokalee Rd o5 'R' "IjOJ 08 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 2 Existing PM Lanes, Volumes, Timings 29: Logan Blvd & Immokalee Rd 1I06/30/2021 -11 --1. 4--- t Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations )) ttt r )) ttt r tt r t r Traffic Volume (vph) 143 1923 238 346 864 49 144 170 409 88 196 84 Future Volume (vph) 143 1923 238 346 864 49 144 170 409 88 196 84 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 360 260 440 190 480 320 290 0 Storage Lanes 2 1 2 1 2 1 1 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.850 0.850 0.850 Fit Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 3433 5085 1583 3433 5085 1583 3433 3539 1583 1770 1863 1583 Fit Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 3433 5085 1583 3433 5085 1583 3433 3539 1583 1770 1863 1583 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 167 116 189 110 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 45 45 Link Distance (ft) 2991 1516 593 587 Travel Time (s) 45.3 23.0 9.0 8.9 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 155 2090 259 376 939 53 157 185 445 96 213 91 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 155 2090 259 376 939 53 157 185 445 96 213 91 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 24 24 24 24 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 Detector Template Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 20 100 20 20 100 20 20 100 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 20 6 20 20 6 20 20 6 20 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Protected Phases 1 6 5 2 7 4 3 8 Permitted Phases 6 2 4 8 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Existing PM Lanes, Volumes, Timings 29: Logan Blvd & Immokalee Rd 06/30/2021 -11 � � t t Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Detector Phase 1 6 6 5 2 2 7 4 4 3 8 8 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 12.0 52.0 52.0 12.0 38.0 38.0 12.1 28.0 28.0 13.0 31.0 31.0 Total Split (s) 33.0 104.0 104.0 26.0 97.0 97.0 19.0 28.0 28.0 22.0 31.0 31.0 Total Split (%) 18.3% 57.8% 57.8% 14.4% 53.9% 53.9% 10.6% 15.6% 15.6% 12.2% 17.2% 17.2% Maximum Green (s) 26.0 97.0 97.0 19.0 90.0 90.0 11.9 20.9 20.9 14.0 23.0 23.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.3 2.3 2.3 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.1 7.1 7.1 11.0 8.0 8.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None C-Max C-Max None C-Max C-Max None Max Max None Max Max Walk Time (s) 9.0 9.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 10.0 10.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 36.0 36.0 24.0 24.0 13.9 13.9 13.0 13.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Act Effct Green (s) 13.5 97.4 97.4 19.0 102.9 102.9 11.5 21.0 21.0 10.5 23.0 23.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.08 0.54 0.54 0.11 0.57 0.57 0.06 0.12 0.12 0.06 0.13 0.13 v/c Ratio 0.60 0.76 0.28 1.04 0.32 0.06 0.72 0.45 1.27 0.93 0.89 0.31 Control Delay 124.4 14.2 1.4 132.6 20.9 0.1 101.1 78.0 174.3 152.4 112.4 8.6 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 124.4 14.2 1.4 132.6 20.9 0.1 101.1 78.0 174.3 152.4 112.4 8.6 LOS F B A F C A F E F F F A Approach Delay 19.7 50.8 137.1 98.4 Approach LOS B D F F Intersection Summa Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 180 Actuated Cycle Length: 180 Offset: 168 (93%), Referenced to phase 2:WBT and 6:EBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 140 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.27 Intersection Signal Delay: 52.6 Intersection LOS: D Intersection Capacity Utilization 88.3% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 29: Logan Blvd & Immokalee Rd 13 05 i6 07 • 08 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 2 AM 2025 No -Build Lanes, Volumes, Timings 3: Livingston Rd & Immokalee Rd 1I06/30/2021 -11 --1. 4--- t Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations )) ttt r )) ttt r )) ttt r )) ttt r Traffic Volume (vph) 394 1042 203 472 2185 461 356 644 412 577 1084 707 Future Volume (vph) 394 1042 203 472 2185 461 356 644 412 577 1084 707 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 640 230 640 0 550 800 450 330 Storage Lanes 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.850 0.850 0.850 Fit Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 3433 5085 1583 3433 5085 1583 3433 5085 1583 3433 5085 1583 Fit Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd.Flow (perm) 3433 5085 1583 3433 5085 1583 3433 5085 1583 3433 5085 1583 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 182 218 243 239 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 45 45 Link Distance (ft) 1540 1911 886 1012 Travel Time (s) 23.3 29.0 13.4 15.3 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 428 1133 221 513 2375 501 387 700 448 627 1178 768 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 428 1133 221 513 2375 501 387 700 448 627 1178 768 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 24 24 24 24 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 Detector Template Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 20 100 20 20 100 20 20 100 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 20 6 20 20 6 20 20 6 20 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Protected Phases 1 6 5 2 7 4 3 8 Permitted Phases 6 2 4 8 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 3: Livingston Rd & Immokalee Rd AM 2025 No -Build -11 --1. 4--- t 1I06/30/2021 t Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Detector Phase 1 6 6 5 2 2 7 4 4 3 8 8 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 12.6 61.6 61.6 12.6 64.6 64.6 12.5 33.0 33.0 12.5 38.0 38.0 Total Split (s) 33.0 80.0 80.0 36.0 83.0 83.0 26.0 33.0 33.0 31.0 38.0 38.0 Total Split (%) 18.3% 44.4% 44.4% 20.0% 46.1 % 46.1 % 14.4% 18.3% 18.3% 17.2% 21.1 % 21.1 % Maximum Green (s) 25.4 72.4 72.4 28.4 75.4 75.4 18.5 25.5 25.5 23.5 30.5 30.5 Yellow Time (s) 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 All -Red Time (s) 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 7.6 7.6 7.6 7.6 7.6 7.6 7.5 7.5 7.5 7.5 7.5 7.5 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lead Lead Lag Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None C-Max C-Max None C-Max C-Max None Max Max None Max Max Walk Time (s) 9.0 9.0 7.0 7.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 45.0 45.0 50.0 50.0 16.5 16.5 21.5 21.5 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Act Effct Green (s) 24.8 72.5 72.5 28.3 76.0 76.0 18.5 25.5 25.5 23.5 30.5 30.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.14 0.40 0.40 0.16 0.42 0.42 0.10 0.14 0.14 0.13 0.17 0.17 v/c Ratio 0.90 0.55 0.30 0.95 1.11 0.63 1.10 0.97 1.04 1.40 1.37 1.65 Control Delay 99.3 42.6 8.5 93.9 89.2 21.3 148.0 103.0 85.3 245.1 224.8 328.9 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 99.3 42.6 8.5 93.9 89.2 21.3 148.0 103.0 85.3 245.1 224.8 328.9 LOS F D A F F C F F F F F F Approach Delay 52.0 79.9 109.1 260.8 Approach LOS D E F F Intersection Summa Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 180 Actuated Cycle Length: 180 Offset: 126 (70%), Referenced to phase 2:WBT and 6:EBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 150 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.65 Intersection Signal Delay: 129.5 Intersection LOS: F Intersection Capacity Utilization 115.0% ICU Level of Service H Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 3: Livingston Rd & Immokalee Rd 01 02 04 3 05 t 6 J 08 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 2 AM 2025 No -Build Lanes, Volumes, Timings 6: Juliet Blvd/Strand Blvd & Immokalee Rd 06/30/2021 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations )) ttt r )) ttt r t r Traffic Volume (vph) 248 1584 174 136 2666 305 178 32 110 137 22 250 Future Volume (vph) 248 1584 174 136 2666 305 178 32 110 137 22 250 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 300 440 500 0 0 125 0 0 Storage Lanes 2 1 2 1 2 1 1 0 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.850 0.850 0.862 Fit Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 3433 5085 1583 3433 5085 1583 3433 1863 1583 1770 1606 0 Fit Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 3433 5085 1583 3433 5085 1583 3433 1863 1583 1770 1606 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 189 193 192 168 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 1911 620 839 1009 Travel Time (s) 29.0 9.4 19.1 22.9 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 270 1722 189 148 2898 332 193 35 120 149 24 272 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 270 1722 189 148 2898 332 193 35 120 149 296 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 24 24 24 24 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 Detector Template Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 20 100 20 20 100 20 20 100 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 20 6 20 20 6 20 20 6 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Protected Phases 1 6 5 2 7 4 3 8 Permitted Phases 6 2 4 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 6: Juliet Blvd/Strand Blvd & Immokalee Rd AM 2025 No -Build -11 --1. 4--- t 1I06/30/2021 t Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Detector Phase 1 6 6 5 2 2 7 4 4 3 8 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 11.8 43.8 43.8 11.8 43.8 43.8 12.1 23.0 23.0 12.1 34.0 Total Split (s) 31.0 102.0 102.0 21.0 92.0 92.0 23.0 23.0 23.0 34.0 34.0 Total Split (%) 17.2% 56.7% 56.7% 11.7% 51.1 % 51.1 % 12.8% 12.8% 12.8% 18.9% 18.9% Maximum Green (s) 24.2 95.2 95.2 14.2 85.2 85.2 15.9 15.9 15.9 26.9 26.9 Yellow Time (s) 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.4 4.4 4.4 4.4 4.4 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 7.1 7.1 7.1 7.1 7.1 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None C-Max C-Max None C-Max C-Max None Max Max None Max Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 30.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 8.9 8.9 19.9 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Act Effct Green (s) 19.4 98.3 98.3 12.5 91.5 91.5 14.4 21.0 21.0 20.3 26.9 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.11 0.55 0.55 0.07 0.51 0.51 0.08 0.12 0.12 0.11 0.15 v/c Ratio 0.73 0.62 0.20 0.62 1.12 0.37 0.70 0.16 0.34 0.75 0.77 Control Delay 76.8 19.9 1.7 104.0 83.8 3.6 94.6 75.6 2.6 99.0 45.8 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 76.8 19.9 1.7 104.0 83.8 3.6 94.6 75.6 2.6 99.0 45.8 LOS E B A F F A F E A F D Approach Delay 25.3 76.8 60.9 63.6 Approach LOS C E E E Intersection Summa Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 180 Actuated Cycle Length: 180 Offset: 117 (65%), Referenced to phase 2:WBT and 6:EBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 145 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.12 Intersection Signal Delay: 57.3 Intersection LOS: E Intersection Capacity Utilization 103.4% ICU Level of Service G Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 6: Juliet Blvd/Strand Blvd & Immokalee Rd 01 02 (R) �4 57 08 j Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 2 AM 2025 No -Build Lanes, Volumes, Timings 10: Immokalee Rd & 1-75 SB Off Ramp 1I06/30/2021 -11 --1. 4--- t Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations fftff r tiff rr Traffic Volume (vph) 0 1478 355 528 2264 0 0 0 0 915 0 886 Future Volume (vph) 0 1478 355 528 2264 0 0 0 0 915 0 886 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 550 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 0 1 2 0 0 0 2 2 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.81 1.00 0.97 0.86 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.88 Frt 0.850 0.850 Fit Protected 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 7544 1583 3433 6408 0 0 0 0 3433 0 2787 Fit Permitted 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 7544 1583 3433 6408 0 0 0 0 3433 0 2787 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 386 159 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 553 554 371 730 Travel Time (s) 8.4 8.4 8.4 16.6 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 1607 386 574 2461 0 0 0 0 995 0 963 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 1607 386 574 2461 0 0 0 0 995 0 963 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Right Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 24 24 24 24 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 2 1 1 2 1 1 Detector Template Thru Right Left Thru Left Right Leading Detector (ft) 100 20 20 100 20 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 6 20 20 6 20 20 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 Turn Type NA Perm Prot NA Prot Prot Protected Phases 12 3 1 23 4 4 Permitted Phases 12 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 AM 2025 No -Build Lanes, Volumes, Timings 10: Immokalee Rd & 1-75 SB Off Ramp 06/30/2021 Lane Group 01 02 05 06 07 08 Laonfigurations Traffic Volume (vph) Future Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Storage Length (ft) Storage Lanes Taper Length (ft) Lane Util. Factor Frt Fit Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Fit Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Right Turn on Red Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) Link Distance (ft) Travel Time (s) Peak Hour Factor Adj. Flow (vph) Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) Enter Blocked Intersection Lane Alignment Median Width(ft) Link Offset(ft) Crosswalk Width(ft) Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor Turning Speed (mph) Number of Detectors Detector Template Leading Detector (ft) Trailing Detector (ft) Detector 1 Position(ft) Detector 1 Size(ft) Detector 1 Type Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) Detector 1 Queue (s) Detector 1 Delay (s) Detector 2 Position(ft) Detector 2 Size(ft) Detector 2 Type Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 2 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 10: Immokalee Rd & 1-75 SB Off Ramp 06/30/2021 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Detector Phase 12 12 3 1 2 3 4 4 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 12.2 12.2 12.2 Total Split (s) 74.0 63.0 63.0 Total Split (%) 41.1% 35.0% 35.0% Maximum Green (s) 66.8 55.8 55.8 Yellow Time (s) 4.8 4.8 4.8 All -Red Time (s) 2.4 2.4 2.4 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 7.2 7.2 7.2 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode C-Max None None Walk Time (s) Flash Dont Walk (s) Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) Act Effct Green (s) 35.4 35.4 66.8 109.4 55.8 55.8 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.20 0.20 0.37 0.61 0.31 0.31 v/c Ratio 1.08 0.62 0.45 0.63 0.94 0.99 Control Delay 90.3 14.3 23.2 10.4 75.9 77.0 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.8 38.1 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 90.3 14.3 24.0 48.4 75.9 77.0 LOS F B C D E E Approach Delay 75.6 43.8 76.4 Approach LOS E D E Intersection Summa Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 180 Actuated Cycle Length: 180 Offset: 97 (54%), Referenced to phase 3:WBTL and 6:, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 150 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.42 Intersection Signal Delay: 62.0 Intersection LOS: E Intersection Capacity Utilization 119.0% ICU Level of Service H Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 10: Immokalee Rd & 1-75 SB Off Ramp =10 =10 410 =10 z �4 io3 �14 14 �14 �14 07 05 �6 O3 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 3 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 10: Immokalee Rd & 1-75 SB Off Ramp 06/30/2021 Lane Group 01 02 05 06 07 08 Detector Phase Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 12.6 29.2 12.6 12.2 38.2 12.2 Total Split (s) 13.0 30.0 13.0 52.0 80.0 35.0 Total Split (%) 7% 17% 7% 29% 44% 19% Maximum Green (s) 5.4 22.8 5.4 44.8 72.8 27.8 Yellow Time (s) 5.5 4.8 5.5 4.8 4.8 4.8 All -Red Time (s) 2.1 2.4 2.1 2.4 2.4 2.4 Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lag Lead Lag Lead Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None Max None C-Max None None Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 15.0 24.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 4 4 Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/C Ratio v/c Ratio Control Delay Queue Delay Total Delay LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS Intersection Summary Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 4 AM 2025 No -Build Lanes, Volumes, Timings 14: 1-75 NB Off Ramp & Immokalee Rd 1I06/30/2021 -11 --1. 4--- t Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations tiff 6 r rr Traffic Volume (vph) 513 1822 0 0 2275 1102 623 0 342 0 0 0 Future Volume (vph) 513 1822 0 0 2275 1102 623 0 342 0 0 0 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 0 300 790 0 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 2 0 0 1 2 2 0 0 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.86 1.00 1.00 0.76 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.88 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.850 Fit Protected 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 3433 6408 0 0 8494 1583 3433 0 2787 0 0 0 Fit Permitted 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 3433 6408 0 0 8494 1583 3433 0 2787 0 0 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 393 159 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 554 1235 655 354 Travel Time (s) 8.4 18.7 14.9 8.0 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 558 1980 0 0 2473 1198 677 0 372 0 0 0 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 558 1980 0 0 2473 1198 677 0 372 0 0 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 24 24 24 24 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 2 1 1 1 Detector Template Left Thru Thru Right Left Right Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 100 20 20 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 6 20 20 20 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 Turn Type Prot NA NA Perm Prot Prot Protected Phases 7 567 56 8 8 Permitted Phases 56 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 AM 2025 No -Build Lanes, Volumes, Timings 14: 1-75 NB Off Ramp & Immokalee Rd 06/30/2021 Lane Group 01 02 03 04 05 06 Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) Future Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Storage Length (ft) Storage Lanes Taper Length (ft) Lane Util. Factor Frt Fit Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Fit Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Right Turn on Red Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) Link Distance (ft) Travel Time (s) Peak Hour Factor Adj. Flow (vph) Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) Enter Blocked Intersection Lane Alignment Median Width(ft) Link Offset(ft) Crosswalk Width(ft) Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor Turning Speed (mph) Number of Detectors Detector Template Leading Detector (ft) Trailing Detector (ft) Detector 1 Position(ft) Detector 1 Size(ft) Detector 1 Type Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) Detector 1 Queue (s) Detector 1 Delay (s) Detector 2 Position(ft) Detector 2 Size(ft) Detector 2 Type Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 2 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 14: 1-75 NB Off Ramp & Immokalee Rd 06/30/2021 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Detector Phase 7 567 56 56 8 8 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 38.2 12.2 12.2 Total Split (s) 80.0 35.0 35.0 Total Split (%) 44.4% 19.4% 19.4% Maximum Green (s) 72.8 27.8 27.8 Yellow Time (s) 4.8 4.8 4.8 All -Red Time (s) 2.4 2.4 2.4 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 7.2 7.2 7.2 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None None None Walk Time (s) 7.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 24.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 4 Act Effct Green (s) 61.6 137.4 68.6 68.6 27.8 27.8 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.34 0.76 0.38 0.38 0.15 0.15 v/c Ratio 0.48 0.40 0.76 1.42 1.28 0.66 Control Delay 24.4 2.8 44.2 210.8 195.7 46.5 Queue Delay 0.5 2.5 0.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 24.9 5.3 44.9 210.8 195.7 46.5 LOS C A D F F D Approach Delay 9.6 99.0 142.8 Approach LOS A F F Intersection Summa Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 180 Actuated Cycle Length: 180 Offset: 97 (54%), Referenced to phase 3:WBTL and 6:, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 150 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.42 Intersection Signal Delay: 74.1 Intersection LOS: E Intersection Capacity Utilization 119.0% ICU Level of Service H Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 14: 1-75 NB Off Ramp & Immokalee Rd =10 =10 10 =10 Cz �4 3'R'- �14 �14 �1.4 �14 07 05 06'R'- �38 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 3 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 14: 1-75 NB Off Ramp & Immokalee Rd 06/30/2021 Lane Group 01 02 03 04 05 06 Detector Phase Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 12.6 29.2 12.2 12.2 12.6 12.2 Total Split (s) 13.0 30.0 74.0 63.0 13.0 52.0 Total Split (%) 7% 17% 41 % 35% 7% 29% Maximum Green (s) 5.4 22.8 66.8 55.8 5.4 44.8 Yellow Time (s) 5.5 4.8 4.8 4.8 5.5 4.8 All -Red Time (s) 2.1 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.1 2.4 Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Vehicle Extension (s) Recall Mode Walk Time (s) Flash Dont Walk (s) Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/C Ratio v/c Ratio Control Delay Queue Delay Total Delay LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS Intersection Summary Lag Lead Lead Yes Yes Yes 3.0 3.0 3.0 None Max C-Max 7.0 15.0 4 Lag Lag Lead Yes Yes Yes 3.0 3.0 3.0 None None C-Max Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 4 AM 2025 No -Build Lanes, Volumes, Timings 18: Tarpon Bay Blvd/Northbrooke Dr & Immokalee Rd 1I06/30/2021 -11 --1. 4--- t Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations ) ttt r )) ttt r 4 r t r Traffic Volume (vph) 284 1639 163 85 2696 56 323 89 105 103 74 378 Future Volume (vph) 284 1639 163 85 2696 56 323 89 105 103 74 378 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 890 0 280 360 0 200 120 0 Storage Lanes 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.850 0.850 0.850 Fit Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.972 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 5085 1583 3433 5085 1583 1681 1720 1583 1770 1863 1583 Fit Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.972 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 5085 1583 3433 5085 1583 1681 1720 1583 1770 1863 1583 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 138 153 150 180 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 1235 815 578 628 Travel Time (s) 18.7 12.3 13.1 14.3 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 309 1782 177 92 2930 61 351 97 114 112 80 411 Shared Lane Traffic (%) 37% Lane Group Flow (vph) 309 1782 177 92 2930 61 221 227 114 112 80 411 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 24 24 12 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 Detector Template Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 20 100 20 20 100 20 20 100 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 20 6 20 20 6 20 20 6 20 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Split NA Perm Split NA Perm Protected Phases 1 6 5 2 4 4 8 8 Permitted Phases 6 2 4 8 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 18: Tarpon Bay Blvd/Northbrooke Dr & Immokalee Rd 06/30/2021 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Detector Phase 1 6 6 5 2 2 4 4 4 8 8 8 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 11.8 43.8 43.8 11.8 38.8 38.8 12.3 12.3 12.3 12.3 12.3 12.3 Total Split (s) 35.0 109.0 109.0 25.0 99.0 99.0 24.0 24.0 24.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 Total Split (%) 19.4% 60.6% 60.6% 13.9% 55.0% 55.0% 13.3% 13.3% 13.3% 12.2% 12.2% 12.2% Maximum Green (s) 28.2 102.2 102.2 18.2 92.2 92.2 16.7 16.7 16.7 14.7 14.7 14.7 Yellow Time (s) 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 7.3 7.3 7.3 7.3 7.3 7.3 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None C-Max C-Max None C-Max C-Max None None None None None None Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 30.0 30.0 25.0 25.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 Act Effct Green (s) 28.2 110.2 110.2 10.2 92.2 92.2 16.7 16.7 16.7 14.7 14.7 14.7 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.16 0.61 0.61 0.06 0.51 0.51 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.08 0.08 0.08 v/c Ratio 1.12 0.57 0.17 0.47 1.13 0.07 1.43 1.43 0.40 0.78 0.53 1.40 Control Delay 142.3 22.0 3.6 91.8 72.5 0.0 277.1 277.1 7.6 113.1 92.4 227.1 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 142.3 22.0 3.6 91.8 72.5 0.0 277.1 277.1 7.6 113.1 92.4 227.1 LOS F C A F E A F F A F F F Approach Delay 37.0 71.6 222.4 188.1 Approach LOS D E F F Intersection Summa Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 180 Actuated Cycle Length: 180 Offset: 59 (33%), Referenced to phase 2:WBT and 6:EBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 125 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.43 Intersection Signal Delay: 83.3 Intersection LOS: F Intersection Capacity Utilization 104.6% ICU Level of Service G Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 18: Tarpon Bay Blvd/Northbrooke Dr & Immokalee Rd 1z438 0 5 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 2 AM 2025 No -Build Lanes, Volumes, Timings 24: Valewood Dr & Immokalee Rd 06/30/2021 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations ) ttt r ) ttt r r Traffic Volume (vph) 264 1551 2 52 2768 23 37 60 12 91 45 350 Future Volume (vph) 264 1551 2 52 2768 23 37 60 12 91 45 350 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 280 185 540 300 0 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.850 0.975 0.850 Fit Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.968 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 5085 1583 1770 5085 1583 1770 1816 0 0 1803 1583 Fit Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.968 Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 5085 1583 1770 5085 1583 1770 1816 0 0 1803 1583 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 116 158 5 236 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 620 977 513 541 Travel Time (s) 9.4 14.8 11.7 12.3 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 287 1686 2 57 3009 25 40 65 13 99 49 380 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 287 1686 2 57 3009 25 40 78 0 0 148 380 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 12 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 2 1 Detector Template Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Left Thru Right Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 20 100 20 20 100 20 100 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 20 6 20 20 6 20 6 20 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA custom NA Perm Protected Phases 1 6 5 2 7 4! 8! 8 Permitted Phases 6 2 8 8 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 24: Valewood Dr & Immokalee Rd 06/30/2021 -11 � � t t Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Detector Phase 1 6 6 5 2 2 7 4 8 8 8 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 12.0 52.0 52.0 12.0 38.0 38.0 12.1 45.0 13.0 13.0 13.0 Total Split (s) 38.0 118.0 118.0 17.0 97.0 97.0 15.0 45.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 Total Split (%) 21.1% 65.6% 65.6% 9.4% 53.9% 53.9% 8.3% 25.0% 16.7% 16.7% 16.7% Maximum Green (s) 31.0 111.0 111.0 10.0 90.0 90.0 7.9 37.9 22.0 22.0 22.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.3 2.3 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.1 7.1 8.0 8.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None C-Max C-Max None C-Max C-Max None Max None None None Walk Time (s) 9.0 9.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 36.0 36.0 24.0 24.0 30.9 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 Act Effct Green (s) 30.6 111.7 111.7 9.3 90.4 90.4 7.5 37.9 25.0 25.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.17 0.62 0.62 0.05 0.50 0.50 0.04 0.21 0.14 0.14 v/c Ratio 0.96 0.53 0.00 0.63 1.18 0.03 0.55 0.20 0.59 0.90 Control Delay 131.1 3.6 0.0 101.4 105.0 0.0 111.2 56.4 84.8 52.8 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 131.1 3.6 0.0 101.4 105.0 0.0 111.2 56.4 84.8 52.8 LOS F A A F F A F E F D Approach Delay 22.1 104.1 75.0 61.8 Approach LOS C F E E Intersection Summa Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 180 Actuated Cycle Length: 180 Offset: 45 (25%), Referenced to phase 2:WBT and 6:EBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 150 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.18 Intersection Signal Delay: 71.2 Intersection LOS: E Intersection Capacity Utilization 100.5% ICU Level of Service G Analysis Period (min) 15 ! Phase conflict between lane groups. Splits and Phases: 24: Valewood Dr & Immokalee Rd 01 02 04 o5 6 "07O8 En Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 2 AM 2025 No -Build Lanes, Volumes, Timings 29: Logan Blvd & Immokalee Rd 1I06/30/2021 -11 --1. 4--- t Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations )) ttt r )) ttt r tt r t r Traffic Volume (vph) 196 1379 173 287 2633 125 267 90 166 149 164 282 Future Volume (vph) 196 1379 173 287 2633 125 267 90 166 149 164 282 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 360 260 440 190 480 320 290 0 Storage Lanes 2 1 2 1 2 1 1 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.850 0.850 0.850 Fit Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 3433 5085 1583 3433 5085 1583 3433 3539 1583 1770 1863 1583 Fit Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 3433 5085 1583 3433 5085 1583 3433 3539 1583 1770 1863 1583 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 151 116 180 198 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 45 45 Link Distance (ft) 2991 1516 593 587 Travel Time (s) 45.3 23.0 9.0 8.9 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 213 1499 188 312 2862 136 290 98 180 162 178 307 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 213 1499 188 312 2862 136 290 98 180 162 178 307 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 24 24 24 24 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 Detector Template Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 20 100 20 20 100 20 20 100 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 20 6 20 20 6 20 20 6 20 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Protected Phases 1 6 5 2 7 4 3 8 Permitted Phases 6 2 4 8 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 29: Logan Blvd & Immokalee Rd AM 2025 No -Build -11 --1. 4--- t 1I06/30/2021 t Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Detector Phase 1 6 6 5 2 2 7 4 4 3 8 8 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 12.0 52.0 52.0 12.0 38.0 38.0 12.1 26.0 26.0 13.0 28.0 28.0 Total Split (s) 30.0 94.0 94.0 30.0 94.0 94.0 28.0 26.0 26.0 30.0 28.0 28.0 Total Split (%) 16.7% 52.2% 52.2% 16.7% 52.2% 52.2% 15.6% 14.4% 14.4% 16.7% 15.6% 15.6% Maximum Green (s) 23.0 87.0 87.0 23.0 87.0 87.0 20.9 18.9 18.9 22.0 20.0 20.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.3 2.3 2.3 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.1 7.1 7.1 8.0 8.0 8.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None C-Max C-Max None C-Max C-Max None Max Max None Max Max Walk Time (s) 9.0 9.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 10.0 10.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 36.0 36.0 24.0 24.0 11.9 11.9 10.0 10.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Act Effct Green (s) 16.5 90.9 90.9 20.7 95.1 95.1 19.2 19.3 19.3 20.0 20.1 20.1 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.09 0.50 0.50 0.12 0.53 0.53 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 v/c Ratio 0.68 0.58 0.22 0.79 1.07 0.15 0.79 0.26 0.55 0.83 0.86 0.87 Control Delay 93.7 37.7 9.0 92.4 78.0 5.6 94.5 76.0 15.4 108.5 111.3 51.7 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 93.7 37.7 9.0 92.4 78.0 5.6 94.5 76.0 15.4 108.5 111.3 51.7 LOS F D A F E A F E B F F D Approach Delay 41.1 76.4 66.2 82.3 Approach LOS D E E F Intersection Summa Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 180 Actuated Cycle Length: 180 Offset: 163 (91 %), Referenced to phase 2:WBT and 6:EBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 145 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.07 Intersection Signal Delay: 65.7 Intersection LOS: E Intersection Capacity Utilization 97.0% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 29: Logan Blvd & Immokalee Rd \10- 01 02 3 05 --1"06 07 7 08 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 2 2025 PM No -Build Lanes, Volumes, Timings 3: Livingston Rd & Immokalee Rd 1I06/30/2021 -11 --1. 4--- t Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations )) ttt r )) ttt r )) ttt r )) ttt r Traffic Volume (vph) 381 1870 250 276 1208 559 264 985 504 568 1239 651 Future Volume (vph) 381 1870 250 276 1208 559 264 985 504 568 1239 651 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 640 230 640 0 550 800 450 330 Storage Lanes 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.850 0.850 0.850 Fit Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 3433 5085 1583 3433 5085 1583 3433 5085 1583 3433 5085 1583 Fit Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd.Flow (perm) 3433 5085 1583 3433 5085 1583 3433 5085 1583 3433 5085 1583 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 164 384 189 209 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 45 45 Link Distance (ft) 1540 1911 886 1012 Travel Time (s) 23.3 29.0 13.4 15.3 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 414 2033 272 300 1313 608 287 1071 548 617 1347 708 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 414 2033 272 300 1313 608 287 1071 548 617 1347 708 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 24 24 24 24 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 Detector Template Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 20 100 20 20 100 20 20 100 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 20 6 20 20 6 20 20 6 20 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Protected Phases 1 6 5 2 7 4 3 8 Permitted Phases 6 2 4 8 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 PORINU�v1.b1 1Mr Lanes, Volumes, Timings 3: Livingston Rd & Immokalee Rd 06/30/2021 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Detector Phase 1 6 6 5 2 2 7 4 4 3 8 8 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 12.6 61.6 61.6 12.6 64.6 64.6 12.5 35.0 35.0 12.5 40.0 40.0 Total Split (s) 32.0 88.0 88.0 28.0 84.0 84.0 24.0 35.0 35.0 29.0 40.0 40.0 Total Split (%) 17.8% 48.9% 48.9% 15.6% 46.7% 46.7% 13.3% 19.4% 19.4% 16.1 % 22.2% 22.2% Maximum Green (s) 24.4 80.4 80.4 20.4 76.4 76.4 16.5 27.5 27.5 21.5 32.5 32.5 Yellow Time (s) 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 All -Red Time (s) 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 7.6 7.6 7.6 7.6 7.6 7.6 7.5 7.5 7.5 7.5 7.5 7.5 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lead Lead Lag Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None C-Max C-Max None C-Max C-Max None Max Max None None None Walk Time (s) 9.0 9.0 7.0 7.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 45.0 45.0 50.0 50.0 18.5 18.5 23.5 23.5 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Act Effct Green (s) 23.9 81.6 81.6 19.2 76.9 76.9 16.5 27.5 27.5 21.5 32.5 32.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.13 0.45 0.45 0.11 0.43 0.43 0.09 0.15 0.15 0.12 0.18 0.18 v/c Ratio 0.91 0.88 0.34 0.82 0.60 0.68 0.91 1.38 1.37 1.50 1.47 1.55 Control Delay 100.9 50.7 13.3 99.9 31.5 11.2 112.5 231.1 213.6 288.0 263.5 288.2 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 100.9 50.7 13.3 99.9 31.5 11.2 112.5 231.1 213.6 288.0 263.5 288.2 LOS F D B F C B F F F F F F Approach Delay 54.6 35.2 208.2 275.7 Approach LOS D D F F Intersection Summa Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 180 Actuated Cycle Length: 180 Offset: 176 (98%), Referenced to phase 2:WBT and 6:EBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 150 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.55 Intersection Signal Delay: 142.9 Intersection LOS: F Intersection Capacity Utilization 104.4% ICU Level of Service G Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 3: Livingston Rd & Immokalee Rd 13 5 6J 7 •38 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 2 2025 PM No -Build Lanes, Volumes, Timings 6: Juliet Blvd/Strand Blvd & Immokalee Rd 06/30/2021 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations )) ttt r )) ttt r t r Traffic Volume (vph) 216 2563 334 262 1671 189 168 30 181 268 39 315 Future Volume (vph) 216 2563 334 262 1671 189 168 30 181 268 39 315 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 300 440 500 0 0 125 0 0 Storage Lanes 2 1 2 1 2 1 1 0 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.850 0.850 0.866 Fit Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 3433 5085 1583 3433 5085 1583 3433 1863 1583 1770 1613 0 Fit Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 3433 5085 1583 3433 5085 1583 3433 1863 1583 1770 1613 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 302 152 150 145 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 1911 620 839 1009 Travel Time (s) 29.0 9.4 19.1 22.9 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 235 2786 363 285 1816 205 183 33 197 291 42 342 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 235 2786 363 285 1816 205 183 33 197 291 384 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 24 24 24 24 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 Detector Template Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 20 100 20 20 100 20 20 100 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 20 6 20 20 6 20 20 6 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Protected Phases 1 6 5 2 7 4 3 8 Permitted Phases 6 2 4 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 2025 PM No -Build Lanes, Volumes, Timings 6: Juliet Blvd/Strand Blvd & Immokalee Rd 06/30/2021 -11 � � t t Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Detector Phase 1 6 6 5 2 2 7 4 4 3 8 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 11.8 43.8 43.8 11.8 43.8 43.8 12.1 14.0 14.0 12.1 32.0 Total Split (s) 27.0 108.0 108.0 22.0 103.0 103.0 18.0 14.0 14.0 36.0 32.0 Total Split (%) 15.0% 60.0% 60.0% 12.2% 57.2% 57.2% 10.0% 7.8% 7.8% 20.0% 17.8% Maximum Green (s) 20.2 101.2 101.2 15.2 96.2 96.2 10.9 11.0 11.0 28.9 24.9 Yellow Time (s) 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.4 2.0 2.0 4.4 4.4 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.7 1.0 1.0 2.7 2.7 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 7.1 3.0 3.0 7.1 7.1 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None C-Max C-Max None C-Max C-Max None None None None Max Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 30.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 4.0 4.0 17.9 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Act Effct Green (s) 17.2 101.2 101.2 15.2 99.2 99.2 10.9 11.0 11.0 28.9 24.9 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.10 0.56 0.56 0.08 0.55 0.55 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.16 0.14 v/c Ratio 0.72 0.97 0.36 0.99 0.65 0.22 0.88 0.29 0.83 1.02 1.10 Control Delay 84.5 31.0 4.2 135.3 7.9 1.5 120.4 87.9 49.2 131.1 120.2 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 84.5 31.0 4.2 135.3 7.9 1.5 120.4 87.9 49.2 131.1 120.2 LOS F C A F A A F F D F F Approach Delay 31.9 23.1 83.9 124.9 Approach LOS C C F F Intersection Summa Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 180 Actuated Cycle Length: 180 Offset: 156 (87%), Referenced to phase 2:WBT and 6:EBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 150 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.10 Intersection Signal Delay: 41.3 Intersection LOS: D Intersection Capacity Utilization 103.9% ICU Level of Service G Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 6: Juliet Blvd/Strand Blvd & Immokalee Rd 1 0 O3 04 5 6 07 T8 0"� Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 2 2025 PM No -Build Lanes, Volumes, Timings 10: Immokalee Rd & 1-75 SB Off Ramp 1I06/30/2021 -11 --1. 4--- t Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations fftff r tiff rr Traffic Volume (vph) 0 2493 454 173 1489 0 0 0 0 1024 0 448 Future Volume (vph) 0 2493 454 173 1489 0 0 0 0 1024 0 448 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 550 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 0 1 2 0 0 0 2 2 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.81 1.00 0.97 0.86 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.88 Frt 0.850 0.850 Fit Protected 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 7544 1583 3433 6408 0 0 0 0 3433 0 2787 Fit Permitted 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 7544 1583 3433 6408 0 0 0 0 3433 0 2787 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 493 159 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 553 554 371 730 Travel Time (s) 8.4 8.4 8.4 16.6 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 2710 493 188 1618 0 0 0 0 1113 0 487 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 2710 493 188 1618 0 0 0 0 1113 0 487 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Right Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 24 24 24 24 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 2 1 1 2 1 1 Detector Template Thru Right Left Thru Left Right Leading Detector (ft) 100 20 20 100 20 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 6 20 20 6 20 20 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 Turn Type NA Perm Prot NA Prot Prot Protected Phases 12 3 1 23 4 4 Permitted Phases 12 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 2025 PM No -Build Lanes, Volumes, Timings 10: Immokalee Rd & 1-75 SB Off Ramp 06/30/2021 Lane Group 01 02 05 06 07 08 Laonfigurations Traffic Volume (vph) Future Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Storage Length (ft) Storage Lanes Taper Length (ft) Lane Util. Factor Frt Fit Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Fit Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Right Turn on Red Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) Link Distance (ft) Travel Time (s) Peak Hour Factor Adj. Flow (vph) Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) Enter Blocked Intersection Lane Alignment Median Width(ft) Link Offset(ft) Crosswalk Width(ft) Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor Turning Speed (mph) Number of Detectors Detector Template Leading Detector (ft) Trailing Detector (ft) Detector 1 Position(ft) Detector 1 Size(ft) Detector 1 Type Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) Detector 1 Queue (s) Detector 1 Delay (s) Detector 2 Position(ft) Detector 2 Size(ft) Detector 2 Type Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 2 PORINU�v1.b1 1Mr Lanes, Volumes, Timings 10: Immokalee Rd & 1-75 SB Off Ramp 06/30/2021 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Detector Phase 12 12 3 1 2 3 4 4 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 12.2 12.2 12.2 Total Split (s) 48.0 64.0 64.0 Total Split (%) 26.7% 35.6% 35.6% Maximum Green (s) 40.8 56.8 56.8 Yellow Time (s) 4.8 4.8 4.8 All -Red Time (s) 2.4 2.4 2.4 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 7.2 7.2 7.2 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode Max None None Walk Time (s) Flash Dont Walk (s) Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) Act Effct Green (s) 60.4 60.4 40.8 108.4 56.8 56.8 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.34 0.34 0.23 0.60 0.32 0.32 v/c Ratio 1.07 0.57 0.24 0.42 1.03 0.49 Control Delay 74.2 7.1 32.9 5.1 93.6 34.6 Queue Delay 12.6 0.0 0.0 2.9 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 86.7 7.1 32.9 7.9 93.6 34.6 LOS F A C A F C Approach Delay 74.5 10.5 75.6 Approach LOS E B E Intersection Summa Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 180 Actuated Cycle Length: 180 Offset: 52 (29%), Referenced to phase 2:EBWB and 7:, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 120 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.15 Intersection Signal Delay: 57.3 Intersection LOS: E Intersection Capacity Utilization 81.4% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 10: Immokalee Rd & 1-75 SB Off Ramp =10 =10 10 =10 5 s =14 14 14 14 J 5 006 4W8 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 3 PORINU�v1.b1 1Mr Lanes, Volumes, Timings 10: Immokalee Rd & 1-75 SB Off Ramp 06/30/2021 Lane Group 01 02 05 06 07 08 Detector Phase Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 12.6 38.2 12.6 12.2 38.2 12.2 Total Split (s) 13.0 55.0 13.0 33.0 106.0 28.0 Total Split (%) 7% 31% 7% 18% 59% 16% Maximum Green (s) 5.4 47.8 5.4 25.8 98.8 20.8 Yellow Time (s) 5.5 4.8 5.5 4.8 4.8 4.8 All -Red Time (s) 2.1 2.4 2.1 2.4 2.4 2.4 Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lag Lead Lag Lead Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None C-Max None None C-Max None Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 24.0 24.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/C Ratio v/c Ratio Control Delay Queue Delay Total Delay LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS Intersection Summary Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 4 2025 PM No -Build Lanes, Volumes, Timings 14: 1-75 NB Off Ramp & Immokalee Rd 1I06/30/2021 -11 --1. 4--- t Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations tiff 6 r rr Traffic Volume (vph) 676 2689 0 0 1294 381 418 0 356 0 0 0 Future Volume (vph) 676 2689 0 0 1294 381 418 0 356 0 0 0 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 0 300 790 0 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 2 0 0 1 2 2 0 0 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.86 1.00 1.00 0.76 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.88 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.850 Fit Protected 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 3433 6408 0 0 8494 1583 3433 0 2787 0 0 0 Fit Permitted 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 3433 6408 0 0 8494 1583 3433 0 2787 0 0 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 302 159 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 554 1235 655 354 Travel Time (s) 8.4 18.7 14.9 8.0 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 735 2923 0 0 1407 414 454 0 387 0 0 0 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 735 2923 0 0 1407 414 454 0 387 0 0 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 24 24 24 24 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 2 1 1 1 Detector Template Left Thru Thru Right Left Right Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 100 20 20 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 6 20 20 20 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 Turn Type Prot NA NA Perm Prot Prot Protected Phases 7 567 56 8 8 Permitted Phases 56 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 2025 PM No -Build Lanes, Volumes, Timings 14: 1-75 NB Off Ramp & Immokalee Rd 06/30/2021 Lane Group 01 02 03 04 05 06 Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) Future Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Storage Length (ft) Storage Lanes Taper Length (ft) Lane Util. Factor Frt Fit Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Fit Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Right Turn on Red Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) Link Distance (ft) Travel Time (s) Peak Hour Factor Adj. Flow (vph) Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) Enter Blocked Intersection Lane Alignment Median Width(ft) Link Offset(ft) Crosswalk Width(ft) Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor Turning Speed (mph) Number of Detectors Detector Template Leading Detector (ft) Trailing Detector (ft) Detector 1 Position(ft) Detector 1 Size(ft) Detector 1 Type Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) Detector 1 Queue (s) Detector 1 Delay (s) Detector 2 Position(ft) Detector 2 Size(ft) Detector 2 Type Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 2 PORINU�v1.b1 1Mr Lanes, Volumes, Timings 14: 1-75 NB Off Ramp & Immokalee Rd 06/30/2021 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Detector Phase 7 567 56 56 8 8 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 38.2 12.2 12.2 Total Split (s) 106.0 28.0 28.0 Total Split (%) 58.9% 15.6% 15.6% Maximum Green (s) 98.8 20.8 20.8 Yellow Time (s) 4.8 4.8 4.8 All -Red Time (s) 2.4 2.4 2.4 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 7.2 7.2 7.2 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode C-Max None None Walk Time (s) 7.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 24.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 Act Effct Green (s) 98.8 144.4 38.4 38.4 20.8 20.8 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.55 0.80 0.21 0.21 0.12 0.12 v/c Ratio 0.39 0.57 0.78 0.72 1.15 0.84 Control Delay 8.5 2.8 47.2 18.3 158.1 61.7 Queue Delay 1.3 32.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 Total Delay 9.8 35.1 47.2 18.3 158.1 61.8 LOS A D D B F E Approach Delay 30.0 40.6 113.8 Approach LOS C D F Intersection Summa Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 180 Actuated Cycle Length: 180 Offset: 52 (29%), Referenced to phase 2:EBWB and 7:, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 120 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.15 Intersection Signal Delay: 44.2 Intersection LOS: D Intersection Capacity Utilization 81.4% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 14: 1-75 NB Off Ramp & Immokalee Rd =10 =10 10 =10 5 s =14 14 14 14 J 5 006 4W8 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 3 PORINU�v1.b1 1Mr Lanes, Volumes, Timings 14: 1-75 NB Off Ramp & Immokalee Rd 06/30/2021 Lane Group 01 02 03 04 05 06 Detector Phase Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 12.6 38.2 12.2 12.2 12.6 12.2 Total Split (s) 13.0 55.0 48.0 64.0 13.0 33.0 Total Split (%) 7% 31% 27% 36% 7% 18% Maximum Green (s) 5.4 47.8 40.8 56.8 5.4 25.8 Yellow Time (s) 5.5 4.8 4.8 4.8 5.5 4.8 All -Red Time (s) 2.1 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.1 2.4 Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lag Lead Lead Lag Lag Lead Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None C-Max Max None None None Walk Time (s) 7.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 24.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/C Ratio v/c Ratio Control Delay Queue Delay Total Delay LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS Intersection Summary Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 4 2025 PM No -Build Lanes, Volumes, Timings 18: Tarpon Bay Blvd/Northbrooke Dr & Immokalee Rd 1I06/30/2021 -11 --1. 4--- t Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations ) ttt r )) ttt r 4 r t r Traffic Volume (vph) 281 2402 371 99 1200 15 307 123 110 167 79 195 Future Volume (vph) 281 2402 371 99 1200 15 307 123 110 167 79 195 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 890 0 280 360 0 200 120 0 Storage Lanes 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.850 0.850 0.850 Fit Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.979 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 5085 1583 3433 5085 1583 1681 1732 1583 1770 1863 1583 Fit Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.979 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 5085 1583 3433 5085 1583 1681 1732 1583 1770 1863 1583 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 215 153 150 212 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 1235 815 578 628 Travel Time (s) 18.7 12.3 13.1 14.3 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 305 2611 403 108 1304 16 334 134 120 182 86 212 Shared Lane Traffic (%) 31 % Lane Group Flow (vph) 305 2611 403 108 1304 16 230 238 120 182 86 212 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 24 24 12 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 Detector Template Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 20 100 20 20 100 20 20 100 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 20 6 20 20 6 20 20 6 20 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Split NA Perm Split NA Perm Protected Phases 1 6 5 2 4 4 8 8 Permitted Phases 6 2 4 8 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 PORINU�v1.b1 1Mr Lanes, Volumes, Timings 18: Tarpon Bay Blvd/Northbrooke Dr & Immokalee Rd 06/30/2021 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Detector Phase 1 6 6 5 2 2 4 4 4 8 8 8 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 11.8 43.8 43.8 11.8 38.8 38.8 30.0 30.0 30.0 23.0 23.0 23.0 Total Split (s) 43.0 109.0 109.0 18.0 84.0 84.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 23.0 23.0 23.0 Total Split (%) 23.9% 60.6% 60.6% 10.0% 46.7% 46.7% 16.7% 16.7% 16.7% 12.8% 12.8% 12.8% Maximum Green (s) 36.2 102.2 102.2 11.2 77.2 77.2 22.7 22.7 22.7 15.7 15.7 15.7 Yellow Time (s) 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 7.3 7.3 7.3 7.3 7.3 7.3 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None C-Max C-Max None C-Max C-Max Max Max Max Max Max Max Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 30.0 30.0 25.0 25.0 15.7 15.7 15.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Act Effct Green (s) 33.9 103.2 103.2 10.2 79.5 79.5 22.7 22.7 22.7 15.7 15.7 15.7 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.19 0.57 0.57 0.06 0.44 0.44 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.09 0.09 0.09 v/c Ratio 0.92 0.90 0.40 0.56 0.58 0.02 1.09 1.09 0.36 1.18 0.53 0.64 Control Delay 124.3 21.8 2.5 88.9 21.6 0.1 156.9 156.4 7.0 195.0 91.2 17.9 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 124.3 21.8 2.5 88.9 21.6 0.1 156.9 156.4 7.0 195.0 91.2 17.9 LOS F C A F C A F F A F F B Approach Delay 28.9 26.5 126.1 98.2 Approach LOS C C F F Intersection Summa Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 180 Actuated Cycle Length: 180 Offset: 86 (48%), Referenced to phase 2:WBT and 6:EBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 150 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.18 Intersection Signal Delay: 43.8 Intersection LOS: D Intersection Capacity Utilization 95.1 % ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 18: Tarpon Bay Blvd/Northbrooke Dr & Immokalee Rd 1 02 04 o8 5 7:_ 06 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 2 2025 PM No -Build Lanes, Volumes, Timings 24: Valewood Dr & Immokalee Rd 06/30/2021 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations ) ttt r ) ttt r r Traffic Volume (vph) 239 2502 9 42 1129 5 45 123 31 139 85 247 Future Volume (vph) 239 2502 9 42 1129 5 45 123 31 139 85 247 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 280 185 540 300 0 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.850 0.970 0.850 Fit Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.970 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 5085 1583 1770 5085 1583 1770 1807 0 0 1807 1583 Fit Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.970 Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 5085 1583 1770 5085 1583 1770 1807 0 0 1807 1583 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 118 161 7 200 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 620 977 513 541 Travel Time (s) 9.4 14.8 11.7 12.3 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 260 2720 10 46 1227 5 49 134 34 151 92 268 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 260 2720 10 46 1227 5 49 168 0 0 243 268 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 12 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 2 1 Detector Template Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Left Thru Right Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 20 100 20 20 100 20 100 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 20 6 20 20 6 20 6 20 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA custom NA Perm Protected Phases 1 6 5 2 7 4! 8! 8 Permitted Phases 6 2 8 8 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 24: Valewood Dr & Immokalee Rd 2025 PM No -Build -11 --1. 4--- t 1I06/30/2021 t Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Detector Phase 1 6 6 5 2 2 7 4 8 8 8 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 12.1 34.1 34.1 12.1 12.1 12.1 12.7 48.7 12.7 12.7 12.7 Total Split (s) 30.0 103.0 103.0 19.0 92.0 92.0 15.0 58.0 43.0 43.0 43.0 Total Split (%) 16.7% 57.2% 57.2% 10.6% 51.1 % 51.1 % 8.3% 32.2% 23.9% 23.9% 23.9% Maximum Green (s) 22.9 95.9 95.9 11.9 84.9 84.9 7.3 50.3 35.3 35.3 35.3 Yellow Time (s) 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.4 4.4 4.4 4.4 4.4 All -Red Time (s) 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 7.1 7.1 7.1 7.1 7.1 7.1 7.7 7.7 7.7 7.7 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None C-Max C-Max None C-Max C-Max None Max Max Max Max Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 0.0 0.0 7.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 20.0 20.0 0.0 0.0 34.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Act Effct Green (s) 22.9 100.8 100.8 9.7 84.9 84.9 7.2 50.3 38.3 38.3 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.13 0.56 0.56 0.05 0.47 0.47 0.04 0.28 0.21 0.21 v/c Ratio 1.16 0.96 0.01 0.48 0.51 0.01 0.70 0.33 0.63 0.54 Control Delay 175.1 19.8 0.0 83.3 41.3 0.0 128.7 51.4 74.1 21.6 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 175.1 19.8 0.0 83.3 41.3 0.0 128.7 51.4 74.1 21.6 LOS F B A F D A F D E C Approach Delay 33.2 42.6 68.9 46.6 Approach LOS C D E D Intersection Summa Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 180 Actuated Cycle Length: 180 Offset: 101 (56%), Referenced to phase 2:WBT and 6:EBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 145 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.16 Intersection Signal Delay: 38.5 Intersection LOS: D Intersection Capacity Utilization 97.7% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15 ! Phase conflict between lane groups. Splits and Phases: 24: Valewood Dr & Immokalee Rd o5 'R' "IjOJ 08 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 2 2025 PM No -Build Lanes, Volumes, Timings 29: Logan Blvd & Immokalee Rd 1I06/30/2021 -11 --1. 4--- t Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations )) ttt r )) ttt r tt r t r Traffic Volume (vph) 167 2248 278 413 1030 58 176 207 499 108 239 103 Future Volume (vph) 167 2248 278 413 1030 58 176 207 499 108 239 103 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 360 260 440 190 480 320 290 0 Storage Lanes 2 1 2 1 2 1 1 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.850 0.850 0.850 Fit Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 3433 5085 1583 3433 5085 1583 3433 3539 1583 1770 1863 1583 Fit Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 3433 5085 1583 3433 5085 1583 3433 3539 1583 1770 1863 1583 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 167 116 181 110 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 45 45 Link Distance (ft) 2991 1516 593 587 Travel Time (s) 45.3 23.0 9.0 8.9 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 182 2443 302 449 1120 63 191 225 542 117 260 112 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 182 2443 302 449 1120 63 191 225 542 117 260 112 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 24 24 24 24 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 Detector Template Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 20 100 20 20 100 20 20 100 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 20 6 20 20 6 20 20 6 20 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Protected Phases 1 6 5 2 7 4 3 8 Permitted Phases 6 2 4 8 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 PORINU�v1.b1 1Mr Lanes, Volumes, Timings 29: Logan Blvd & Immokalee Rd 06/30/2021 -11 � � t t Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Detector Phase 1 6 6 5 2 2 7 4 4 3 8 8 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 12.0 52.0 52.0 12.0 38.0 38.0 12.1 28.0 28.0 13.0 31.0 31.0 Total Split (s) 33.0 104.0 104.0 26.0 97.0 97.0 19.0 28.0 28.0 22.0 31.0 31.0 Total Split (%) 18.3% 57.8% 57.8% 14.4% 53.9% 53.9% 10.6% 15.6% 15.6% 12.2% 17.2% 17.2% Maximum Green (s) 26.0 97.0 97.0 19.0 90.0 90.0 11.9 20.9 20.9 14.0 23.0 23.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.3 2.3 2.3 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.1 7.1 7.1 11.0 8.0 8.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None C-Max C-Max None C-Max C-Max None Max Max None Max Max Walk Time (s) 9.0 9.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 10.0 10.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 36.0 36.0 24.0 24.0 13.9 13.9 13.0 13.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Act Effct Green (s) 14.9 97.0 97.0 19.0 101.1 101.1 11.9 20.9 20.9 11.0 23.0 23.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.08 0.54 0.54 0.11 0.56 0.56 0.07 0.12 0.12 0.06 0.13 0.13 v/c Ratio 0.64 0.89 0.32 1.24 0.39 0.07 0.85 0.55 1.58 1.08 1.09 0.38 Control Delay 117.7 18.5 1.4 190.9 22.9 0.1 112.4 80.7 303.6 184.0 154.0 15.2 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 117.7 18.5 1.4 190.9 22.9 0.1 112.4 80.7 303.6 184.0 154.0 15.2 LOS F B A F C A F F F F F B Approach Delay 22.9 68.3 213.1 129.4 Approach LOS C E F F Intersection Summa Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 180 Actuated Cycle Length: 180 Offset: 168 (93%), Referenced to phase 2:WBT and 6:EBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 150 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.58 Intersection Signal Delay: 74.3 Intersection LOS: E Intersection Capacity Utilization 101.2% ICU Level of Service G Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 29: Logan Blvd & Immokalee Rd 13 05 i6 07 • 08 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 2 2040 AM No -Build Lanes, Volumes, Timings 3: Livingston Rd & Immokalee Rd 1I06/30/2021 -11 --1. 4--- t Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations )) ttt r )) ttt r )) ttt r )) ttt r Traffic Volume (vph) 577 1527 297 688 3187 672 542 980 627 1201 2258 1472 Future Volume (vph) 577 1527 297 688 3187 672 542 980 627 1201 2258 1472 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 640 230 640 0 550 800 450 330 Storage Lanes 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.850 0.850 0.850 Fit Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 3433 5085 1583 3433 5085 1583 3433 5085 1583 3433 5085 1583 Fit Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd.Flow (perm) 3433 5085 1583 3433 5085 1583 3433 5085 1583 3433 5085 1583 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 181 218 230 238 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 45 45 Link Distance (ft) 1540 1911 886 1012 Travel Time (s) 23.3 29.0 13.4 15.3 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 627 1660 323 748 3464 730 589 1065 682 1305 2454 1600 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 627 1660 323 748 3464 730 589 1065 682 1305 2454 1600 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 24 24 24 24 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 Detector Template Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 20 100 20 20 100 20 20 100 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 20 6 20 20 6 20 20 6 20 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Protected Phases 1 6 5 2 7 4 3 8 Permitted Phases 6 2 4 8 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 2040 AM No -Build Lanes, Volumes, Timings 3: Livingston Rd & Immokalee Rd 1I06/30/2021 -11 --1. 4--- t Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Detector Phase 1 6 6 5 2 2 7 4 4 3 8 8 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 12.6 61.6 61.6 12.6 64.6 64.6 12.5 33.0 33.0 12.5 38.0 38.0 Total Split (s) 33.0 80.0 80.0 36.0 83.0 83.0 26.0 33.0 33.0 31.0 38.0 38.0 Total Split (%) 18.3% 44.4% 44.4% 20.0% 46.1 % 46.1 % 14.4% 18.3% 18.3% 17.2% 21.1 % 21.1 % Maximum Green (s) 25.4 72.4 72.4 28.4 75.4 75.4 18.5 25.5 25.5 23.5 30.5 30.5 Yellow Time (s) 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 All -Red Time (s) 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 7.6 7.6 7.6 7.6 7.6 7.6 7.5 7.5 7.5 7.5 7.5 7.5 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lead Lead Lag Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None C-Max C-Max None C-Max C-Max None Max Max None Max Max Walk Time (s) 9.0 9.0 7.0 7.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 45.0 45.0 50.0 50.0 16.5 16.5 21.5 21.5 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Act Effct Green (s) 25.4 72.4 72.4 28.4 75.4 75.4 18.5 25.5 25.5 23.5 30.5 30.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.14 0.40 0.40 0.16 0.42 0.42 0.10 0.14 0.14 0.13 0.17 0.17 v/c Ratio 1.30 0.81 0.43 1.38 1.63 0.93 1.67 1.48 1.62 2.91 2.85 3.44 Control Delay 204.2 51.7 18.1 231.0 313.7 32.6 358.5 271.5 317.3 889.6 858.6 1119.3 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 204.2 51.7 18.1 231.0 313.7 32.6 358.5 271.5 317.3 889.6 858.6 1119.3 LOS F D B F F C F F F F F F Approach Delay 84.2 259.7 306.8 944.0 Approach LOS F F F F Intersection Summa Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 180 Actuated Cycle Length: 180 Offset: 126 (70%), Referenced to phase 2:WBT and 6:EBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 150 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 3.44 Intersection Signal Delay: 477.4 Intersection LOS: F Intersection Capacity Utilization 187.0% ICU Level of Service H Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 3: Livingston Rd & Immokalee Rd 01 0 04 3 05 t 6 J 08 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 2 2040 AM No -Build Lanes, Volumes, Timings 6: Juliet Blvd/Strand Blvd & Immokalee Rd 06/30/2021 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations )) ttt r )) ttt r t r Traffic Volume (vph) 361 2311 254 198 3889 445 284 54 176 219 34 398 Future Volume (vph) 361 2311 254 198 3889 445 284 54 176 219 34 398 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 300 440 500 0 0 125 0 0 Storage Lanes 2 1 2 1 2 1 1 0 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.850 0.850 0.862 Fit Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 3433 5085 1583 3433 5085 1583 3433 1863 1583 1770 1606 0 Fit Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 3433 5085 1583 3433 5085 1583 3433 1863 1583 1770 1606 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 237 193 192 161 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 1911 620 839 1009 Travel Time (s) 29.0 9.4 19.1 22.9 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 392 2512 276 215 4227 484 309 59 191 238 37 433 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 392 2512 276 215 4227 484 309 59 191 238 470 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 24 24 24 24 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 Detector Template Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 20 100 20 20 100 20 20 100 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 20 6 20 20 6 20 20 6 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Protected Phases 1 6 5 2 7 4 3 8 Permitted Phases 6 2 4 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 P0111171Ji1►61 1Mre Lanes, Volumes, Timings 6: Juliet Blvd/Strand Blvd & Immokalee Rd 06/30/2021 -11 � � t t Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Detector Phase 1 6 6 5 2 2 7 4 4 3 8 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 11.8 43.8 43.8 11.8 43.8 43.8 12.1 23.0 23.0 12.1 34.0 Total Split (s) 31.0 102.0 102.0 21.0 92.0 92.0 23.0 23.0 23.0 34.0 34.0 Total Split (%) 17.2% 56.7% 56.7% 11.7% 51.1 % 51.1 % 12.8% 12.8% 12.8% 18.9% 18.9% Maximum Green (s) 24.2 95.2 95.2 14.2 85.2 85.2 15.9 15.9 15.9 26.9 26.9 Yellow Time (s) 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.4 4.4 4.4 4.4 4.4 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 7.1 7.1 7.1 7.1 7.1 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None C-Max C-Max None C-Max C-Max None Max Max None Max Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 30.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 8.9 8.9 19.9 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Act Effct Green (s) 23.4 95.5 95.5 13.9 86.0 86.0 15.9 16.7 16.7 26.1 26.9 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.13 0.53 0.53 0.08 0.48 0.48 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.14 0.15 v/c Ratio 0.88 0.93 0.29 0.81 1.74 0.56 1.02 0.34 0.60 0.93 1.25 Control Delay 58.2 33.0 4.4 91.1 357.7 9.5 134.6 83.1 16.9 115.0 170.1 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 58.2 33.0 4.4 91.1 357.7 9.5 134.6 83.1 16.9 115.0 170.1 LOS E C A F F A F F B F F Approach Delay 33.6 311.9 88.9 151.6 Approach LOS C F F F Intersection Summa Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 180 Actuated Cycle Length: 180 Offset: 117 (65%), Referenced to phase 2:WBT and 6:EBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 145 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.74 Intersection Signal Delay: 192.1 Intersection LOS: F Intersection Capacity Utilization 143.1 % ICU Level of Service H Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 6: Juliet Blvd/Strand Blvd & Immokalee Rd 01 02 (R) 04 57 08 j Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 2 2040 AM No -Build Lanes, Volumes, Timings 10: Immokalee Rd & 1-75 SB Off Ramp 1I06/30/2021 -11 --1. 4--- t Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations fftff r tiff rr Traffic Volume (vph) 0 2156 517 710 3046 0 0 0 0 1418 0 1374 Future Volume (vph) 0 2156 517 710 3046 0 0 0 0 1418 0 1374 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 550 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 0 1 2 0 0 0 2 2 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.81 1.00 0.97 0.86 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.88 Frt 0.850 0.850 Fit Protected 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 7544 1583 3433 6408 0 0 0 0 3433 0 2787 Fit Permitted 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 7544 1583 3433 6408 0 0 0 0 3433 0 2787 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 525 159 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 553 554 371 730 Travel Time (s) 8.4 8.4 8.4 16.6 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 2343 562 772 3311 0 0 0 0 1541 0 1493 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 2343 562 772 3311 0 0 0 0 1541 0 1493 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Right Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 24 24 24 24 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 2 1 1 2 1 1 Detector Template Thru Right Left Thru Left Right Leading Detector (ft) 100 20 20 100 20 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 6 20 20 6 20 20 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 Turn Type NA Perm Prot NA Prot Prot Protected Phases 12 3 1 23 4 4 Permitted Phases 12 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 2040 AM No -Build Lanes, Volumes, Timings 10: Immokalee Rd & 1-75 SB Off Ramp 06/30/2021 Lane Group 01 02 05 06 07 08 Laonfigurations Traffic Volume (vph) Future Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Storage Length (ft) Storage Lanes Taper Length (ft) Lane Util. Factor Frt Fit Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Fit Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Right Turn on Red Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) Link Distance (ft) Travel Time (s) Peak Hour Factor Adj. Flow (vph) Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) Enter Blocked Intersection Lane Alignment Median Width(ft) Link Offset(ft) Crosswalk Width(ft) Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor Turning Speed (mph) Number of Detectors Detector Template Leading Detector (ft) Trailing Detector (ft) Detector 1 Position(ft) Detector 1 Size(ft) Detector 1 Type Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) Detector 1 Queue (s) Detector 1 Delay (s) Detector 2 Position(ft) Detector 2 Size(ft) Detector 2 Type Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 2 P0111171Ji1►6111IIC Lanes, Volumes, Timings 10: Immokalee Rd & 1-75 SB Off Ramp 06/30/2021 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Detector Phase 12 12 3 1 2 3 4 4 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 12.2 12.2 12.2 Total Split (s) 74.0 63.0 63.0 Total Split (%) 41.1% 35.0% 35.0% Maximum Green (s) 66.8 55.8 55.8 Yellow Time (s) 4.8 4.8 4.8 All -Red Time (s) 2.4 2.4 2.4 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 7.2 7.2 7.2 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode C-Max None None Walk Time (s) Flash Dont Walk (s) Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) Act Effct Green (s) 35.4 35.4 66.8 109.4 55.8 55.8 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.20 0.20 0.37 0.61 0.31 0.31 v/c Ratio 1.58 0.77 0.61 0.85 1.45 1.53 Control Delay 296.2 15.6 24.5 9.6 249.5 281.4 Queue Delay 0.3 0.0 4.0 46.7 0.1 0.0 Total Delay 296.5 15.6 28.5 56.4 249.6 281.4 LOS F B C E F F Approach Delay 242.2 51.1 265.2 Approach LOS F D F Intersection Summa Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 180 Actuated Cycle Length: 180 Offset: 97 (54%), Referenced to phase 3:WBTL and 6:, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 150 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 2.27 Intersection Signal Delay: 171.3 Intersection LOS: F Intersection Capacity Utilization 161.4% ICU Level of Service H Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 10: Immokalee Rd & 1-75 SB Off Ramp �10 10 410 =10 C 10 z 3, �14 �14 �14 �14 07 05 �6 O3 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 3 P0111171Ji1►61 1Mre Lanes, Volumes, Timings 10: Immokalee Rd & 1-75 SB Off Ramp 06/30/2021 Lane Group 01 02 05 06 07 08 Detector Phase Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 12.6 29.2 12.6 12.2 38.2 12.2 Total Split (s) 13.0 30.0 13.0 52.0 80.0 35.0 Total Split (%) 7% 17% 7% 29% 44% 19% Maximum Green (s) 5.4 22.8 5.4 44.8 72.8 27.8 Yellow Time (s) 5.5 4.8 5.5 4.8 4.8 4.8 All -Red Time (s) 2.1 2.4 2.1 2.4 2.4 2.4 Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lag Lead Lag Lead Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None Max None C-Max None None Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 15.0 24.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 4 4 Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/C Ratio v/c Ratio Control Delay Queue Delay Total Delay LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS Intersection Summary Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 4 2040 AM No -Build Lanes, Volumes, Timings 14: 1-75 NB Off Ramp & Immokalee Rd 1I06/30/2021 -11 --1. 4--- t Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations tiff 6 r rr Traffic Volume (vph) 690 2452 0 0 3060 1482 1108 0 608 0 0 0 Future Volume (vph) 690 2452 0 0 3060 1482 1108 0 608 0 0 0 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 0 300 790 0 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 2 0 0 1 2 2 0 0 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.86 1.00 1.00 0.76 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.88 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.850 Fit Protected 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 3433 6408 0 0 8494 1583 3433 0 2787 0 0 0 Fit Permitted 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 3433 6408 0 0 8494 1583 3433 0 2787 0 0 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 328 159 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 554 1235 655 354 Travel Time (s) 8.4 18.7 14.9 8.0 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 750 2665 0 0 3326 1611 1204 0 661 0 0 0 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 750 2665 0 0 3326 1611 1204 0 661 0 0 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 24 24 24 24 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 2 1 1 1 Detector Template Left Thru Thru Right Left Right Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 100 20 20 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 6 20 20 20 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 Turn Type Prot NA NA Perm Prot Prot Protected Phases 7 567 56 8 8 Permitted Phases 56 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 2040 AM No -Build Lanes, Volumes, Timings 14: 1-75 NB Off Ramp & Immokalee Rd 06/30/2021 Lane Group 01 02 03 04 05 06 Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) Future Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Storage Length (ft) Storage Lanes Taper Length (ft) Lane Util. Factor Frt Fit Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Fit Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Right Turn on Red Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) Link Distance (ft) Travel Time (s) Peak Hour Factor Adj. Flow (vph) Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) Enter Blocked Intersection Lane Alignment Median Width(ft) Link Offset(ft) Crosswalk Width(ft) Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor Turning Speed (mph) Number of Detectors Detector Template Leading Detector (ft) Trailing Detector (ft) Detector 1 Position(ft) Detector 1 Size(ft) Detector 1 Type Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) Detector 1 Queue (s) Detector 1 Delay (s) Detector 2 Position(ft) Detector 2 Size(ft) Detector 2 Type Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 2 P0111171Ji1►6111IIC Lanes, Volumes, Timings 14: 1-75 NB Off Ramp & Immokalee Rd 06/30/2021 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Detector Phase 7 567 56 56 8 8 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 38.2 12.2 12.2 Total Split (s) 80.0 35.0 35.0 Total Split (%) 44.4% 19.4% 19.4% Maximum Green (s) 72.8 27.8 27.8 Yellow Time (s) 4.8 4.8 4.8 All -Red Time (s) 2.4 2.4 2.4 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 7.2 7.2 7.2 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None None None Walk Time (s) 7.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 24.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 4 Act Effct Green (s) 72.8 137.4 57.4 57.4 27.8 27.8 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.40 0.76 0.32 0.32 0.15 0.15 v/c Ratio 0.54 0.54 1.23 2.21 2.27 1.17 Control Delay 18.6 6.4 148.2 566.6 607.8 142.0 Queue Delay 3.9 47.5 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 22.5 53.9 148.5 566.6 607.8 142.0 LOS C D F F F F Approach Delay 47.0 284.9 442.7 Approach LOS D F F Intersection Summa Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 180 Actuated Cycle Length: 180 Offset: 97 (54%), Referenced to phase 3:WBTL and 6:, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 150 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 2.27 Intersection Signal Delay: 234.2 Intersection LOS: F Intersection Capacity Utilization 161.4% ICU Level of Service H Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 14: 1-75 NB Off Ramp & Immokalee Rd �10 10 10 =10 Cz �4 3'R'- �14 �14 �1.4 �14 07 05 06'R'- �38 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 3 P0111171Ji1►61 1Mre Lanes, Volumes, Timings 14: 1-75 NB Off Ramp & Immokalee Rd 06/30/2021 Lane Group 01 02 03 04 05 06 Detector Phase Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 12.6 29.2 12.2 12.2 12.6 12.2 Total Split (s) 13.0 30.0 74.0 63.0 13.0 52.0 Total Split (%) 7% 17% 41 % 35% 7% 29% Maximum Green (s) 5.4 22.8 66.8 55.8 5.4 44.8 Yellow Time (s) 5.5 4.8 4.8 4.8 5.5 4.8 All -Red Time (s) 2.1 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.1 2.4 Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Vehicle Extension (s) Recall Mode Walk Time (s) Flash Dont Walk (s) Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/C Ratio v/c Ratio Control Delay Queue Delay Total Delay LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS Intersection Summary Lag Lead Lead Yes Yes Yes 3.0 3.0 3.0 None Max C-Max 7.0 15.0 4 Lag Lag Lead Yes Yes Yes 3.0 3.0 3.0 None None C-Max Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 4 2040 AM No -Build Lanes, Volumes, Timings 18: Tarpon Bay Blvd/Northbrooke Dr & Immokalee Rd 1I06/30/2021 -11 --1. 4--- t Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations ) ttt r )) ttt r 4 r t r Traffic Volume (vph) 383 2205 219 119 3784 78 516 142 167 165 118 604 Future Volume (vph) 383 2205 219 119 3784 78 516 142 167 165 118 604 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 890 0 280 360 0 200 120 0 Storage Lanes 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.850 0.850 0.850 Fit Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.972 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 5085 1583 3433 5085 1583 1681 1720 1583 1770 1863 1583 Fit Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.972 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 5085 1583 3433 5085 1583 1681 1720 1583 1770 1863 1583 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 138 153 150 179 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 1235 815 578 628 Travel Time (s) 18.7 12.3 13.1 14.3 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 416 2397 238 129 4113 85 561 154 182 179 128 657 Shared Lane Traffic (%) 37% Lane Group Flow (vph) 416 2397 238 129 4113 85 353 362 182 179 128 657 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 24 24 12 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 Detector Template Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 20 100 20 20 100 20 20 100 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 20 6 20 20 6 20 20 6 20 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Split NA Perm Split NA Perm Protected Phases 1 6 5 2 4 4 8 8 Permitted Phases 6 2 4 8 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 2040 AM No -Build Lanes, Volumes, Timings 18: Tarpon Bay Blvd/Northbrooke Dr & Immokalee Rd 1I06/30/2021 -11 --1. 4--- t Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Detector Phase 1 6 6 5 2 2 4 4 4 8 8 8 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 11.8 43.8 43.8 11.8 38.8 38.8 12.3 12.3 12.3 12.3 12.3 12.3 Total Split (s) 35.0 109.0 109.0 25.0 99.0 99.0 24.0 24.0 24.0 22.0 22.0 22.0 Total Split (%) 19.4% 60.6% 60.6% 13.9% 55.0% 55.0% 13.3% 13.3% 13.3% 12.2% 12.2% 12.2% Maximum Green (s) 28.2 102.2 102.2 18.2 92.2 92.2 16.7 16.7 16.7 14.7 14.7 14.7 Yellow Time (s) 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 7.3 7.3 7.3 7.3 7.3 7.3 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None C-Max C-Max None C-Max C-Max None None None None None None Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 30.0 30.0 25.0 25.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 Act Effct Green (s) 28.2 108.3 108.3 12.1 92.2 92.2 16.7 16.7 16.7 14.7 14.7 14.7 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.16 0.60 0.60 0.07 0.51 0.51 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.08 0.08 0.08 v/c Ratio 1.50 0.78 0.24 0.56 1.58 0.10 2.28 2.28 0.65 1.24 0.84 2.24 Control Delay 286.7 33.2 5.3 91.5 280.3 0.1 625.3 624.6 28.6 216.5 120.3 591.1 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 286.7 33.2 5.3 91.5 280.3 0.1 625.3 624.6 28.6 216.5 120.3 591.1 LOS F C A F F A F F C F F F Approach Delay 65.6 269.2 504.0 459.1 Approach LOS E F F F Intersection Summa Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 180 Actuated Cycle Length: 180 Offset: 59 (33%), Referenced to phase 2:WBT and 6:EBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 145 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 2.28 Intersection Signal Delay: 244.5 Intersection LOS: F Intersection Capacity Utilization 146.4% ICU Level of Service H Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 18: Tarpon Bav Blvd/Northbrooke Dr & Immokalee Rd 1z438 0 5 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 2 2040 AM No -Build Lanes, Volumes, Timings 24: Valewood Dr & Immokalee Rd 06/30/2021 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations ) ttt r ) ttt r r Traffic Volume (vph) 370 2177 2 72 3884 32 58 96 19 144 71 559 Future Volume (vph) 370 2177 2 72 3884 32 58 96 19 144 71 559 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 280 185 540 300 0 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.850 0.975 0.850 Fit Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.968 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 5085 1583 1770 5085 1583 1770 1816 0 0 1803 1583 Fit Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.968 Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 5085 1583 1770 5085 1583 1770 1816 0 0 1803 1583 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 116 158 5 225 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 620 977 513 541 Travel Time (s) 9.4 14.8 11.7 12.3 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 402 2366 2 78 4222 35 63 104 21 157 77 608 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 402 2366 2 78 4222 35 63 125 0 0 234 608 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 12 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 2 1 Detector Template Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Left Thru Right Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 20 100 20 20 100 20 100 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 20 6 20 20 6 20 6 20 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA custom NA Perm Protected Phases 1 6 5 2 7 4! 8! 8 Permitted Phases 6 2 8 8 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 P0111171Ji1►61 1Mre Lanes, Volumes, Timings 24: Valewood Dr & Immokalee Rd 06/30/2021 -11 � � t t Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Detector Phase 1 6 6 5 2 2 7 4 8 8 8 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 12.0 52.0 52.0 12.0 38.0 38.0 12.1 45.0 13.0 13.0 13.0 Total Split (s) 38.0 118.0 118.0 17.0 97.0 97.0 15.0 45.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 Total Split (%) 21.1% 65.6% 65.6% 9.4% 53.9% 53.9% 8.3% 25.0% 16.7% 16.7% 16.7% Maximum Green (s) 31.0 111.0 111.0 10.0 90.0 90.0 7.9 37.9 22.0 22.0 22.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.3 2.3 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.1 7.1 8.0 8.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None C-Max C-Max None C-Max C-Max None Max None None None Walk Time (s) 9.0 9.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 36.0 36.0 24.0 24.0 30.9 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 Act Effct Green (s) 31.0 111.2 111.2 9.8 90.0 90.0 7.9 37.9 22.0 22.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.17 0.62 0.62 0.05 0.50 0.50 0.04 0.21 0.12 0.12 v/c Ratio 1.32 0.75 0.00 0.81 1.66 0.04 0.82 0.32 1.06 1.56 Control Delay 219.6 14.3 0.0 99.3 319.5 0.0 142.9 60.4 149.6 291.3 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 219.6 14.3 0.0 99.3 319.5 0.0 142.9 60.4 149.6 291.3 LOS F B A F F A F E F F Approach Delay 44.1 313.0 88.1 252.0 Approach LOS D F F F Intersection Summa Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 180 Actuated Cycle Length: 180 Offset: 45 (25%), Referenced to phase 2:WBT and 6:EBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 150 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.66 Intersection Signal Delay: 209.9 Intersection LOS: F Intersection Capacity Utilization 134.3% ICU Level of Service H Analysis Period (min) 15 ! Phase conflict between lane groups. Splits and Phases: 24: Valewood Dr & Immokalee Rd 01 02 04 o5 6 "07O8 En Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 2 2040 AM No -Build Lanes, Volumes, Timings 29: Logan Blvd & Immokalee Rd 1I06/30/2021 -11 --1. 4--- t Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations )) ttt r )) ttt r tt r t r Traffic Volume (vph) 289 2037 255 444 4077 194 437 148 272 245 268 462 Future Volume (vph) 289 2037 255 444 4077 194 437 148 272 245 268 462 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 360 260 440 190 480 320 290 0 Storage Lanes 2 1 2 1 2 1 1 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.850 0.850 0.850 Fit Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 3433 5085 1583 3433 5085 1583 3433 3539 1583 1770 1863 1583 Fit Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 3433 5085 1583 3433 5085 1583 3433 3539 1583 1770 1863 1583 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 151 116 202 192 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 45 45 Link Distance (ft) 2991 1516 593 587 Travel Time (s) 45.3 23.0 9.0 8.9 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 314 2214 277 483 4432 211 475 161 296 266 291 502 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 314 2214 277 483 4432 211 475 161 296 266 291 502 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 24 24 24 24 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 Detector Template Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 20 100 20 20 100 20 20 100 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 20 6 20 20 6 20 20 6 20 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Protected Phases 1 6 5 2 7 4 3 8 Permitted Phases 6 2 4 8 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 29: Logan Blvd & Immokalee Rd 2040 AM No -Build -11 --1. 4--- t 1I06/30/2021 t Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Detector Phase 1 6 6 5 2 2 7 4 4 3 8 8 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 12.0 52.0 52.0 12.0 38.0 38.0 12.1 26.0 26.0 13.0 28.0 28.0 Total Split (s) 30.0 94.0 94.0 30.0 94.0 94.0 28.0 26.0 26.0 30.0 28.0 28.0 Total Split (%) 16.7% 52.2% 52.2% 16.7% 52.2% 52.2% 15.6% 14.4% 14.4% 16.7% 15.6% 15.6% Maximum Green (s) 23.0 87.0 87.0 23.0 87.0 87.0 20.9 18.9 18.9 22.0 20.0 20.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.3 2.3 2.3 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.1 7.1 7.1 8.0 8.0 8.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None C-Max C-Max None C-Max C-Max None Max Max None Max Max Walk Time (s) 9.0 9.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 10.0 10.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 36.0 36.0 24.0 24.0 11.9 11.9 10.0 10.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Act Effct Green (s) 20.7 87.0 87.0 23.0 89.3 89.3 20.9 18.9 18.9 22.0 20.0 20.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.12 0.48 0.48 0.13 0.50 0.50 0.12 0.10 0.10 0.12 0.11 0.11 v/c Ratio 0.80 0.90 0.33 1.10 1.76 0.25 1.19 0.43 0.85 1.23 1.41 1.45 Control Delay 86.8 58.3 19.5 142.5 372.0 12.4 172.8 79.5 47.2 198.2 261.5 248.2 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 86.8 58.3 19.5 142.5 372.0 12.4 172.8 79.5 47.2 198.2 261.5 248.2 LOS F E B F F B F E D F F F Approach Delay 57.6 335.5 116.8 239.3 Approach LOS E F F F Intersection Summa Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 180 Actuated Cycle Length: 180 Offset: 163 (91 %), Referenced to phase 2:WBT and 6:EBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 145 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.76 Intersection Signal Delay: 226.1 Intersection LOS: F Intersection Capacity Utilization 138.3% ICU Level of Service H Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 29: Logan Blvd & Immokalee Rd \10- 01 02 3 05 --1"06 07 7 08 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 2 2040 PM No -Build Lanes, Volumes, Timings 3: Livingston Rd & Immokalee Rd 1I06/30/2021 -11 --1. 4--- t Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations )) ttt r )) ttt r )) ttt r )) ttt r Traffic Volume (vph) 559 2742 367 402 1761 815 402 1499 767 1182 2581 1356 Future Volume (vph) 559 2742 367 402 1761 815 402 1499 767 1182 2581 1356 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 640 230 640 0 550 800 450 330 Storage Lanes 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.850 0.850 0.850 Fit Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 3433 5085 1583 3433 5085 1583 3433 5085 1583 3433 5085 1583 Fit Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd.Flow (perm) 3433 5085 1583 3433 5085 1583 3433 5085 1583 3433 5085 1583 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 164 380 188 198 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 45 45 Link Distance (ft) 1540 1911 886 1012 Travel Time (s) 23.3 29.0 13.4 15.3 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 608 2980 399 437 1914 886 437 1629 834 1285 2805 1474 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 608 2980 399 437 1914 886 437 1629 834 1285 2805 1474 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 24 24 24 24 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 Detector Template Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 20 100 20 20 100 20 20 100 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 20 6 20 20 6 20 20 6 20 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Protected Phases 1 6 5 2 7 4 3 8 Permitted Phases 6 2 4 8 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 P011141Ji1►61 1Mre Lanes, Volumes, Timings 3: Livingston Rd & Immokalee Rd 06/30/2021 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Detector Phase 1 6 6 5 2 2 7 4 4 3 8 8 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 12.6 61.6 61.6 12.6 64.6 64.6 12.5 35.0 35.0 12.5 40.0 40.0 Total Split (s) 32.0 88.0 88.0 28.0 84.0 84.0 24.0 35.0 35.0 29.0 40.0 40.0 Total Split (%) 17.8% 48.9% 48.9% 15.6% 46.7% 46.7% 13.3% 19.4% 19.4% 16.1 % 22.2% 22.2% Maximum Green (s) 24.4 80.4 80.4 20.4 76.4 76.4 16.5 27.5 27.5 21.5 32.5 32.5 Yellow Time (s) 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 All -Red Time (s) 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 7.6 7.6 7.6 7.6 7.6 7.6 7.5 7.5 7.5 7.5 7.5 7.5 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lead Lead Lag Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None C-Max C-Max None C-Max C-Max None Max Max None None None Walk Time (s) 9.0 9.0 7.0 7.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 9.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 45.0 45.0 50.0 50.0 18.5 18.5 23.5 23.5 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Act Effct Green (s) 24.4 80.4 80.4 20.4 76.4 76.4 16.5 27.5 27.5 21.5 32.5 32.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.14 0.45 0.45 0.11 0.42 0.42 0.09 0.15 0.15 0.12 0.18 0.18 v/c Ratio 1.31 1.31 0.50 1.12 0.89 1.00 1.39 2.10 2.08 3.13 3.06 3.29 Control Delay 209.5 183.5 22.2 132.5 43.5 32.0 249.0 531.3 518.7 987.9 949.0 1052.8 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 209.5 183.5 22.2 132.5 43.5 32.0 249.0 531.3 518.7 987.9 949.0 1052.8 LOS F F C F D C F F F F F F Approach Delay 171.3 52.4 485.2 985.5 Approach LOS F D F F Intersection Summa Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 180 Actuated Cycle Length: 180 Offset: 176 (98%), Referenced to phase 2:WBT and 6:EBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 150 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 3.29 Intersection Signal Delay: 493.6 Intersection LOS: F Intersection Capacity Utilization 153.0% ICU Level of Service H Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 3: Livingston Rd & Immokalee Rd 13 5 6J 7 •38 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 2 2040 PM No -Build Lanes, Volumes, Timings 6: Juliet Blvd/Strand Blvd & Immokalee Rd 06/30/2021 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations )) ttt r )) ttt r t r Traffic Volume (vph) 315 3738 488 382 2438 275 268 47 288 428 62 503 Future Volume (vph) 315 3738 488 382 2438 275 268 47 288 428 62 503 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 300 440 500 0 0 125 0 0 Storage Lanes 2 1 2 1 2 1 1 0 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.850 0.850 0.866 Fit Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 3433 5085 1583 3433 5085 1583 3433 1863 1583 1770 1613 0 Fit Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 3433 5085 1583 3433 5085 1583 3433 1863 1583 1770 1613 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 303 152 150 136 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 1911 620 839 1009 Travel Time (s) 29.0 9.4 19.1 22.9 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 342 4063 530 415 2650 299 291 51 313 465 67 547 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 342 4063 530 415 2650 299 291 51 313 465 614 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 24 24 24 24 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 Detector Template Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 20 100 20 20 100 20 20 100 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 20 6 20 20 6 20 20 6 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Protected Phases 1 6 5 2 7 4 3 8 Permitted Phases 6 2 4 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 2040 PM No -Build Lanes, Volumes, Timings 6: Juliet Blvd/Strand Blvd & Immokalee Rd 06/30/2021 -11 � � t t Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Detector Phase 1 6 6 5 2 2 7 4 4 3 8 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 11.8 43.8 43.8 11.8 43.8 43.8 12.1 14.0 14.0 12.1 32.0 Total Split (s) 27.0 108.0 108.0 22.0 103.0 103.0 18.0 14.0 14.0 36.0 32.0 Total Split (%) 15.0% 60.0% 60.0% 12.2% 57.2% 57.2% 10.0% 7.8% 7.8% 20.0% 17.8% Maximum Green (s) 20.2 101.2 101.2 15.2 96.2 96.2 10.9 11.0 11.0 28.9 24.9 Yellow Time (s) 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.4 2.0 2.0 4.4 4.4 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.7 1.0 1.0 2.7 2.7 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 7.1 3.0 3.0 7.1 7.1 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None C-Max C-Max None C-Max C-Max None None None None Max Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 30.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 4.0 4.0 17.9 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Act Effct Green (s) 19.9 101.2 101.2 15.2 96.5 96.5 10.9 11.0 11.0 28.9 24.9 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.11 0.56 0.56 0.08 0.54 0.54 0.06 0.06 0.06 0.16 0.14 v/c Ratio 0.90 1.42 0.52 1.44 0.97 0.33 1.41 0.45 1.32 1.64 1.81 Control Delay 85.8 220.6 10.6 269.6 24.3 2.3 263.8 94.7 199.2 344.7 403.2 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 85.8 220.6 10.6 269.6 24.3 2.3 263.8 94.7 199.2 344.7 403.2 LOS F F B F C A F F F F F Approach Delay 188.7 52.6 219.8 378.0 Approach LOS F D F F Intersection Summa Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 180 Actuated Cycle Length: 180 Offset: 156 (87%), Referenced to phase 2:WBT and 6:EBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 150 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.81 Intersection Signal Delay: 165.5 Intersection LOS: F Intersection Capacity Utilization 145.7% ICU Level of Service H Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 6: Juliet Blvd/Strand Blvd & Immokalee Rd 1 0 O3 04 5 6 07 T8 0"� Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 2 2040 PM No -Build Lanes, Volumes, Timings 10: Immokalee Rd & 1-75 SB Off Ramp 1I06/30/2021 -11 --1. 4--- t Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations fftff r tiff rr Traffic Volume (vph) 0 3636 662 233 2004 0 0 0 0 1587 0 694 Future Volume (vph) 0 3636 662 233 2004 0 0 0 0 1587 0 694 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 550 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 0 1 2 0 0 0 2 2 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.81 1.00 0.97 0.86 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.88 Frt 0.850 0.850 Fit Protected 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 7544 1583 3433 6408 0 0 0 0 3433 0 2787 Fit Permitted 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 7544 1583 3433 6408 0 0 0 0 3433 0 2787 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 511 159 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 553 554 371 730 Travel Time (s) 8.4 8.4 8.4 16.6 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 3952 720 253 2178 0 0 0 0 1725 0 754 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 3952 720 253 2178 0 0 0 0 1725 0 754 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Right Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 24 24 24 24 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 2 1 1 2 1 1 Detector Template Thru Right Left Thru Left Right Leading Detector (ft) 100 20 20 100 20 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 6 20 20 6 20 20 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 Turn Type NA Perm Prot NA Prot Prot Protected Phases 12 3 1 23 4 4 Permitted Phases 12 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 2040 PM No -Build Lanes, Volumes, Timings 10: Immokalee Rd & 1-75 SB Off Ramp 06/30/2021 Lane Group 01 02 05 06 07 08 Laonfigurations Traffic Volume (vph) Future Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Storage Length (ft) Storage Lanes Taper Length (ft) Lane Util. Factor Frt Fit Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Fit Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Right Turn on Red Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) Link Distance (ft) Travel Time (s) Peak Hour Factor Adj. Flow (vph) Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) Enter Blocked Intersection Lane Alignment Median Width(ft) Link Offset(ft) Crosswalk Width(ft) Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor Turning Speed (mph) Number of Detectors Detector Template Leading Detector (ft) Trailing Detector (ft) Detector 1 Position(ft) Detector 1 Size(ft) Detector 1 Type Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) Detector 1 Queue (s) Detector 1 Delay (s) Detector 2 Position(ft) Detector 2 Size(ft) Detector 2 Type Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 2 P011141Ji1►6111IIC Lanes, Volumes, Timings 10: Immokalee Rd & 1-75 SB Off Ramp 06/30/2021 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Detector Phase 12 12 3 1 2 3 4 4 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 12.2 12.2 12.2 Total Split (s) 48.0 64.0 64.0 Total Split (%) 26.7% 35.6% 35.6% Maximum Green (s) 40.8 56.8 56.8 Yellow Time (s) 4.8 4.8 4.8 All -Red Time (s) 2.4 2.4 2.4 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 7.2 7.2 7.2 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode Max None None Walk Time (s) Flash Dont Walk (s) Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) Act Effct Green (s) 60.4 60.4 40.8 108.4 56.8 56.8 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.34 0.34 0.23 0.60 0.32 0.32 v/c Ratio 1.56 0.83 0.33 0.56 1.59 0.76 Control Delay 283.8 15.8 40.2 5.8 309.4 49.1 Queue Delay 0.4 3.2 0.0 48.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 284.2 18.9 40.2 53.8 309.4 49.1 LOS F B D D F D Approach Delay 243.3 52.4 230.3 Approach LOS F D F Intersection Summa Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 180 Actuated Cycle Length: 180 Offset: 52 (29%), Referenced to phase 2:EBWB and 7:, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 140 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 2.04 Intersection Signal Delay: 191.5 Intersection LOS: F Intersection Capacity Utilization 112.4% ICU Level of Service H Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 10: Immokalee Rd & 1-75 SB Off Ramp �10 =10 �10 =10 02 04 03 �14 �14 �14 =14 .400 7 5 6 .4w8 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 3 P011141Ji1►61 1Mre Lanes, Volumes, Timings 10: Immokalee Rd & 1-75 SB Off Ramp 06/30/2021 Lane Group 01 02 05 06 07 08 Detector Phase Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 12.6 38.2 12.6 12.2 38.2 12.2 Total Split (s) 13.0 55.0 13.0 33.0 106.0 28.0 Total Split (%) 7% 31% 7% 18% 59% 16% Maximum Green (s) 5.4 47.8 5.4 25.8 98.8 20.8 Yellow Time (s) 5.5 4.8 5.5 4.8 4.8 4.8 All -Red Time (s) 2.1 2.4 2.1 2.4 2.4 2.4 Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lag Lead Lag Lead Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None C-Max None None C-Max None Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 24.0 24.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/C Ratio v/c Ratio Control Delay Queue Delay Total Delay LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS Intersection Summary Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 4 2040 PM No -Build Lanes, Volumes, Timings 14: 1-75 NB Off Ramp & Immokalee Rd 1I06/30/2021 -11 --1. 4--- t Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations tiff 6 r rr Traffic Volume (vph) 909 3618 0 0 1741 512 743 0 632 0 0 0 Future Volume (vph) 909 3618 0 0 1741 512 743 0 632 0 0 0 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 0 300 790 0 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 2 0 0 1 2 2 0 0 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.86 1.00 1.00 0.76 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.88 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.850 Fit Protected 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 3433 6408 0 0 8494 1583 3433 0 2787 0 0 0 Fit Permitted 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 3433 6408 0 0 8494 1583 3433 0 2787 0 0 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 225 159 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 554 1235 655 354 Travel Time (s) 8.4 18.7 14.9 8.0 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 988 3933 0 0 1892 557 808 0 687 0 0 0 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 988 3933 0 0 1892 557 808 0 687 0 0 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 24 24 24 24 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 2 1 1 1 Detector Template Left Thru Thru Right Left Right Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 100 20 20 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 6 20 20 20 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 Turn Type Prot NA NA Perm Prot Prot Protected Phases 7 567 56 8 8 Permitted Phases 56 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 2040 PM No -Build Lanes, Volumes, Timings 14: 1-75 NB Off Ramp & Immokalee Rd 06/30/2021 Lane Group 01 02 03 04 05 06 Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) Future Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Storage Length (ft) Storage Lanes Taper Length (ft) Lane Util. Factor Frt Fit Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Fit Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Right Turn on Red Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) Link Distance (ft) Travel Time (s) Peak Hour Factor Adj. Flow (vph) Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) Enter Blocked Intersection Lane Alignment Median Width(ft) Link Offset(ft) Crosswalk Width(ft) Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor Turning Speed (mph) Number of Detectors Detector Template Leading Detector (ft) Trailing Detector (ft) Detector 1 Position(ft) Detector 1 Size(ft) Detector 1 Type Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) Detector 1 Queue (s) Detector 1 Delay (s) Detector 2 Position(ft) Detector 2 Size(ft) Detector 2 Type Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 2 P011141Ji1►6111IIC Lanes, Volumes, Timings 14: 1-75 NB Off Ramp & Immokalee Rd 06/30/2021 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Detector Phase 7 567 56 56 8 8 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 38.2 12.2 12.2 Total Split (s) 106.0 28.0 28.0 Total Split (%) 58.9% 15.6% 15.6% Maximum Green (s) 98.8 20.8 20.8 Yellow Time (s) 4.8 4.8 4.8 All -Red Time (s) 2.4 2.4 2.4 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 7.2 7.2 7.2 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode C-Max None None Walk Time (s) 7.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 24.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 Act Effct Green (s) 98.8 144.4 38.4 38.4 20.8 20.8 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.55 0.80 0.21 0.21 0.12 0.12 v/c Ratio 0.52 0.77 1.04 1.08 2.04 1.49 Control Delay 10.3 10.7 72.8 65.9 511.0 267.3 Queue Delay 18.9 46.8 22.9 0.0 0.0 0.3 Total Delay 29.1 57.5 95.7 65.9 511.0 267.6 LOS C E F E F F Approach Delay 51.8 88.9 399.2 Approach LOS D F F Intersection Summa Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 180 Actuated Cycle Length: 180 Offset: 52 (29%), Referenced to phase 2:EBWB and 7:, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 140 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 2.04 Intersection Signal Delay: 120.6 Intersection LOS: F Intersection Capacity Utilization 112.4% ICU Level of Service H Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 14: 1-75 NB Off Ramp & Immokalee Rd �10 =10 �10 =10 02 04 03 �14 �1 �14 =14 .400 J 5 6 .4w8 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 3 P011141Ji1►61 1Mre Lanes, Volumes, Timings 14: 1-75 NB Off Ramp & Immokalee Rd 06/30/2021 Lane Group 01 02 03 04 05 06 Detector Phase Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 12.6 38.2 12.2 12.2 12.6 12.2 Total Split (s) 13.0 55.0 48.0 64.0 13.0 33.0 Total Split (%) 7% 31% 27% 36% 7% 18% Maximum Green (s) 5.4 47.8 40.8 56.8 5.4 25.8 Yellow Time (s) 5.5 4.8 4.8 4.8 5.5 4.8 All -Red Time (s) 2.1 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.1 2.4 Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lag Lead Lead Lag Lag Lead Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None C-Max Max None None None Walk Time (s) 7.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 24.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/C Ratio v/c Ratio Control Delay Queue Delay Total Delay LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS Intersection Summary Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 4 2040 PM No -Build Lanes, Volumes, Timings 18: Tarpon Bay Blvd/Northbrooke Dr & Immokalee Rd 1I06/30/2021 -11 --1. 4--- t Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations ) ttt r )) ttt r 4 r t r Traffic Volume (vph) 378 3232 499 139 1684 21 490 197 176 266 126 311 Future Volume (vph) 378 3232 499 139 1684 21 490 197 176 266 126 311 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 890 0 280 360 0 200 120 0 Storage Lanes 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.850 0.850 0.850 Fit Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.979 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 5085 1583 3433 5085 1583 1681 1732 1583 1770 1863 1583 Fit Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.979 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 5085 1583 3433 5085 1583 1681 1732 1583 1770 1863 1583 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 214 153 150 250 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 1235 815 578 628 Travel Time (s) 18.7 12.3 13.1 14.3 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 411 3513 542 151 1830 23 533 214 191 289 137 338 Shared Lane Traffic (%) 31 % Lane Group Flow (vph) 411 3513 542 151 1830 23 368 379 191 289 137 338 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 24 24 12 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 Detector Template Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 20 100 20 20 100 20 20 100 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 20 6 20 20 6 20 20 6 20 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Split NA Perm Split NA Perm Protected Phases 1 6 5 2 4 4 8 8 Permitted Phases 6 2 4 8 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 P011141Ji1►61 1Mre Lanes, Volumes, Timings 18: Tarpon Bay Blvd/Northbrooke Dr & Immokalee Rd 06/30/2021 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Detector Phase 1 6 6 5 2 2 4 4 4 8 8 8 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 11.8 43.8 43.8 11.8 38.8 38.8 30.0 30.0 30.0 23.0 23.0 23.0 Total Split (s) 43.0 109.0 109.0 18.0 84.0 84.0 30.0 30.0 30.0 23.0 23.0 23.0 Total Split (%) 23.9% 60.6% 60.6% 10.0% 46.7% 46.7% 16.7% 16.7% 16.7% 12.8% 12.8% 12.8% Maximum Green (s) 36.2 102.2 102.2 11.2 77.2 77.2 22.7 22.7 22.7 15.7 15.7 15.7 Yellow Time (s) 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 7.3 7.3 7.3 7.3 7.3 7.3 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None C-Max C-Max None C-Max C-Max Max Max Max Max Max Max Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 30.0 30.0 25.0 25.0 15.7 15.7 15.7 8.7 8.7 8.7 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Act Effct Green (s) 36.2 102.5 102.5 10.9 77.2 77.2 22.7 22.7 22.7 15.7 15.7 15.7 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.20 0.57 0.57 0.06 0.43 0.43 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.09 0.09 0.09 v/c Ratio 1.16 1.21 0.55 0.73 0.84 0.03 1.74 1.74 0.58 1.88 0.85 0.92 Control Delay 158.4 121.4 6.7 92.1 39.8 0.0 394.3 391.4 25.9 456.3 118.6 51.9 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 158.4 121.4 6.7 92.1 39.8 0.0 394.3 391.4 25.9 456.3 118.6 51.9 LOS F F A F D A F F C F F D Approach Delay 110.9 43.3 318.1 216.9 Approach LOS F D F F Intersection Summa Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 180 Actuated Cycle Length: 180 Offset: 86 (48%), Referenced to phase 2:WBT and 6:EBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 150 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.88 Intersection Signal Delay: 128.0 Intersection LOS: F Intersection Capacity Utilization 123.6% ICU Level of Service H Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 18: Tarpon Bay Blvd/Northbrooke Dr & Immokalee Rd 1 02 04 o8 5 7:_ 06 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 2 2040 PM No -Build Lanes, Volumes, Timings 24: Valewood Dr & Immokalee Rd 06/30/2021 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations ) ttt r ) ttt r r Traffic Volume (vph) 336 3511 13 58 1584 7 71 197 49 221 135 395 Future Volume (vph) 336 3511 13 58 1584 7 71 197 49 221 135 395 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 280 185 540 300 0 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.850 0.970 0.850 Fit Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.970 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 5085 1583 1770 5085 1583 1770 1807 0 0 1807 1583 Fit Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.970 Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 5085 1583 1770 5085 1583 1770 1807 0 0 1807 1583 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 118 161 7 171 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 620 977 513 541 Travel Time (s) 9.4 14.8 11.7 12.3 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 365 3816 14 63 1722 8 77 214 53 240 147 429 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 365 3816 14 63 1722 8 77 267 0 0 387 429 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 12 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 2 1 Detector Template Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Left Thru Right Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 20 100 20 20 100 20 100 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 20 6 20 20 6 20 6 20 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA custom NA Perm Protected Phases 1 6 5 2 7 4! 8! 8 Permitted Phases 6 2 8 8 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 24: Valewood Dr & Immokalee Rd 2040 PM No -Build -11 --1. 4--- t 1I06/30/2021 t Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Detector Phase 1 6 6 5 2 2 7 4 8 8 8 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 12.1 34.1 34.1 12.1 12.1 12.1 12.7 48.7 12.7 12.7 12.7 Total Split (s) 30.0 103.0 103.0 19.0 92.0 92.0 15.0 58.0 43.0 43.0 43.0 Total Split (%) 16.7% 57.2% 57.2% 10.6% 51.1 % 51.1 % 8.3% 32.2% 23.9% 23.9% 23.9% Maximum Green (s) 22.9 95.9 95.9 11.9 84.9 84.9 7.3 50.3 35.3 35.3 35.3 Yellow Time (s) 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.4 4.4 4.4 4.4 4.4 All -Red Time (s) 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 7.1 7.1 7.1 7.1 7.1 7.1 7.7 7.7 7.7 7.7 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None C-Max C-Max None C-Max C-Max None Max Max Max Max Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 0.0 0.0 7.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 20.0 20.0 0.0 0.0 34.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Act Effct Green (s) 22.9 97.3 97.3 10.5 84.9 84.9 7.3 50.3 35.3 35.3 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.13 0.54 0.54 0.06 0.47 0.47 0.04 0.28 0.20 0.20 v/c Ratio 1.62 1.39 0.02 0.61 0.72 0.01 1.08 0.52 1.09 0.96 Control Delay 333.9 195.2 0.0 90.3 41.4 0.0 205.6 57.6 139.3 75.3 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 333.9 195.2 0.0 90.3 41.4 0.0 205.6 57.6 139.3 75.3 LOS F F A F D A F E F E Approach Delay 206.6 43.0 90.7 105.6 Approach LOS F D F F Intersection Summa Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 180 Actuated Cycle Length: 180 Offset: 101 (56%), Referenced to phase 2:WBT and 6:EBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 145 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.62 Intersection Signal Delay: 148.5 Intersection LOS: F Intersection Capacity Utilization 129.4% ICU Level of Service H Analysis Period (min) 15 ! Phase conflict between lane groups. Splits and Phases: 24: Valewood Dr & Immokalee Rd o5 'R' "IjOJ 08 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 2 2040 PM No -Build Lanes, Volumes, Timings 29: Logan Blvd & Immokalee Rd 1I06/30/2021 -11 --1. 4--- t Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations )) ttt r )) ttt r tt r t r Traffic Volume (vph) 247 3320 411 639 1594 90 288 340 819 177 392 169 Future Volume (vph) 247 3320 411 639 1594 90 288 340 819 177 392 169 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 360 260 440 190 480 320 290 0 Storage Lanes 2 1 2 1 2 1 1 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.850 0.850 0.850 Fit Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 3433 5085 1583 3433 5085 1583 3433 3539 1583 1770 1863 1583 Fit Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 3433 5085 1583 3433 5085 1583 3433 3539 1583 1770 1863 1583 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 167 116 173 110 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 45 45 Link Distance (ft) 2991 1516 593 587 Travel Time (s) 45.3 23.0 9.0 8.9 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 268 3609 447 695 1733 98 313 370 890 192 426 184 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 268 3609 447 695 1733 98 313 370 890 192 426 184 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 24 24 24 24 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 Detector Template Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 20 100 20 20 100 20 20 100 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 20 6 20 20 6 20 20 6 20 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Protected Phases 1 6 5 2 7 4 3 8 Permitted Phases 6 2 4 8 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 P011141Ji1►61 1Mre Lanes, Volumes, Timings 29: Logan Blvd & Immokalee Rd 06/30/2021 -11 � � t t Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Detector Phase 1 6 6 5 2 2 7 4 4 3 8 8 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 12.0 52.0 52.0 12.0 38.0 38.0 12.1 28.0 28.0 13.0 31.0 31.0 Total Split (s) 33.0 104.0 104.0 26.0 97.0 97.0 19.0 28.0 28.0 22.0 31.0 31.0 Total Split (%) 18.3% 57.8% 57.8% 14.4% 53.9% 53.9% 10.6% 15.6% 15.6% 12.2% 17.2% 17.2% Maximum Green (s) 26.0 97.0 97.0 19.0 90.0 90.0 11.9 20.9 20.9 14.0 23.0 23.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.3 2.3 2.3 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.1 7.1 7.1 11.0 8.0 8.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None C-Max C-Max None C-Max C-Max None Max Max None Max Max Walk Time (s) 9.0 9.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 10.0 10.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 36.0 36.0 24.0 24.0 13.9 13.9 13.0 13.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Act Effct Green (s) 19.3 97.0 97.0 19.0 96.7 96.7 11.9 20.9 20.9 11.0 23.0 23.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.11 0.54 0.54 0.11 0.54 0.54 0.07 0.12 0.12 0.06 0.13 0.13 v/c Ratio 0.73 1.32 0.48 1.92 0.63 0.11 1.38 0.90 2.65 1.78 1.79 0.62 Control Delay 108.4 165.3 1.2 460.9 31.0 2.2 253.9 103.3 770.1 426.2 411.1 39.4 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 108.4 165.3 1.2 460.9 31.0 2.2 253.9 103.3 770.1 426.2 411.1 39.4 LOS F F A F C A F F F F F D Approach Delay 144.8 148.1 510.5 329.4 Approach LOS F F F F Intersection Summa Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 180 Actuated Cycle Length: 180 Offset: 168 (93%), Referenced to phase 2:WBT and 6:EBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 150 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 2.65 Intersection Signal Delay: 224.1 Intersection LOS: F Intersection Capacity Utilization 145.6% ICU Level of Service H Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 29: Logan Blvd & Immokalee Rd 13 05 i6 07 • 08 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 2 2040 AM Best Case Lanes, Volumes, Timings 3: 07/15/2021 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations )) ttt r* )) ttt r* t r*r* ))) t r* Traffic Volume (vph) 512 1354 264 552 2554 539 457 166 529 563 212 690 Future Volume (vph) 512 1354 264 552 2554 539 457 166 529 563 212 690 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 350 0 500 0 0 300 0 0 Storage Lanes 2 1 1 1 2 2 3 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.88 0.94 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.850 0.850 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 3433 5085 1583 3433 5085 1583 3433 1863 2787 4990 1863 1583 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 3433 5085 1583 3433 5085 1583 3433 1863 2787 4990 1863 1583 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 165 240 575 334 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 45 45 Link Distance (ft) 509 823 498 502 Travel Time (s) 7.7 12.5 7.5 7.6 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 557 1472 287 600 2776 586 497 180 575 612 230 750 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 557 1472 287 600 2776 586 497 180 575 612 230 750 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 24 24 64 64 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 Detector Template Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 20 100 20 20 100 20 20 100 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 20 6 20 20 6 20 20 6 20 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot Protected Phases 1 6 5 Permitted Phases 6 NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Free 2 7 4 3 8 Free Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 2040 AM Best Case Lanes, Volumes, Timings 3: 07/15/2021 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Detector Phase 1 6 6 5 2 2 7 4 4 3 8 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 11.0 41.0 41.0 11.0 41.0 41.0 11.0 25.0 25.0 11.0 32.0 Total Split (s) 30.0 58.0 58.0 63.0 91.0 91.0 27.0 26.0 26.0 33.0 32.0 Total Split (%) 16.7% 32.2% 32.2% 35.0% 50.6% 50.6% 15.0% 14.4% 14.4% 18.3% 17.8% Maximum Green (s) 24.0 52.0 52.0 57.0 85.0 85.0 21.0 20.0 20.0 27.0 26.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None C-Max C-Max None C-Max C-Max None None None None Max Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 28.0 28.0 28.0 28.0 12.0 12.0 19.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Act Effct Green (s) 24.0 71.7 71.7 37.3 85.0 85.0 21.0 21.3 21.3 25.7 26.0 180.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.13 0.40 0.40 0.21 0.47 0.47 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.14 0.14 1.00 v/c Ratio 1.22 0.73 0.39 0.85 1.16 0.67 1.24 0.82 0.69 0.86 0.86 0.47 Control Delay 178.0 49.1 18.1 86.1 97.6 5.2 189.3 104.1 9.6 88.3 102.3 1.0 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 178.0 49.1 18.1 86.1 97.6 5.2 189.3 104.1 9.6 88.3 102.3 1.0 LOS F D B F F A F F A F F A Approach Delay 76.3 82.2 94.5 49.2 Approach LOS E F F D Intersection Summa Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 180 Actuated Cycle Length: 180 Offset: 176 (98%), Referenced to phase 2:WBT and 6:EBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 145 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.24 Intersection Signal Delay: 76.6 Intersection LOS: E Intersection Capacity Utilization 108.1 % ICU Level of Service G Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 3: 01 07'R 03 04 435 36 fR 07 T 08 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 2 2040 AM Best Case Lanes, Volumes, Timings 6: Immokalee Rd 07/15/2021 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations )) ttt r* )) tIM t r* Traffic Volume (vph) 289 1852 204 165 3117 357 209 38 129 135 21 254 Future Volume (vph) 289 1852 204 165 3117 357 209 38 129 135 21 254 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 300 440 500 0 0 125 300 0 Storage Lanes 2 1 2 0 2 1 1 0 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.86 0.86 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.985 0.850 0.862 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 3433 5085 1583 3433 6312 0 3433 1863 1583 3433 1606 0 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 3433 5085 1583 3433 6312 0 3433 1863 1583 3433 1606 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 198 21 148 267 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 601 360 567 549 Travel Time (s) 9.1 5.5 12.9 12.5 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 314 2013 222 179 3388 388 227 41 140 147 23 276 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 314 2013 222 179 3776 0 227 41 140 147 299 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 36 36 24 24 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 1 1 2 1 2 1 1 2 Detector Template Left Thru Right Left Thru Left Thru Right Left Thru Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 20 100 20 100 20 20 100 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 20 6 20 6 20 20 6 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Prot NA Perm Prot NA Protected Phases 1 6 5 2 7 4 3 8 Permitted Phases 6 4 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 2040 AM Best Case Lanes, Volumes, Timings 6: Immokalee Rd 07/15/2021 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Detector Phase 1 6 6 5 2 7 4 4 3 8 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 11.8 36.8 36.8 11.8 36.8 12.1 26.1 26.1 12.1 26.1 Total Split (s) 37.0 85.0 85.0 45.0 93.0 23.0 27.0 27.0 23.0 27.0 Total Split (%) 20.6% 47.2% 47.2% 25.0% 51.7% 12.8% 15.0% 15.0% 12.8% 15.0% Maximum Green (s) 30.2 78.2 78.2 38.2 86.2 15.9 19.9 19.9 15.9 19.9 Yellow Time (s) 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.4 4.4 4.4 4.4 4.4 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 7.1 7.1 7.1 7.1 7.1 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None C-Max C-Max None C-Max None None None None None Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 23.0 23.0 23.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 4 4 4 4 4 4 Act Effct Green (s) 21.7 111.1 111.1 14.8 104.1 15.2 13.5 13.5 12.9 11.1 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.12 0.62 0.62 0.08 0.58 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.07 0.06 v/c Ratio 0.76 0.64 0.21 0.64 1.03 0.78 0.29 0.55 0.60 0.86 Control Delay 74.1 45.5 15.3 85.3 48.3 99.4 82.4 16.8 91.1 35.2 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 74.1 45.5 15.3 85.3 48.3 99.4 82.4 16.8 91.1 35.2 LOS E D B F D F F B F D Approach Delay 46.4 50.0 69.3 53.6 Approach LOS D D E D Intersection Summa Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 180 Actuated Cycle Length: 180 Offset: 117 (65%), Referenced to phase 2:WBT and 6:EBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 150 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.03 Intersection Signal Delay: 50.0 Intersection LOS: D Intersection Capacity Utilization 105.3% ICU Level of Service G Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 6: Immokalee Rd 01 IF 2 rR 03 04 435 06'R 07 • 08 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 2 2040 AM Best Case Lanes, Volumes, Timings 11: --10- -�k ic 07/15/2021 Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT NWL NWR 02 03 04 06 07 Lane Configurations tt 1111 Traffic Volume (vph) 0 0 0 1124 2515 0 Future Volume (vph) 0 0 0 1124 2515 0 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.91 1.00 Frt Flt Protected 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 0 0 3539 6441 0 Flt Permitted 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 0 0 3539 6441 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 2164 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 45 Link Distance (ft) 254 457 227 Travel Time (s) 3.8 6.9 3.4 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 0 0 1222 2734 0 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 0 0 1222 2734 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Right Left Right Left Right Median Width(ft) 0 0 48 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 9 15 15 9 Number of Detectors 2 1 Detector Template Thru Left Leading Detector (ft) 100 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 6 20 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 Turn Type NA Prot Protected Phases 8! Free! 2 3 4 6 7 Permitted Phases Detector Phase 8 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 2040 AM Best Case Lanes, Volumes, Timings 1 1: 07/15/2021 10. -�k ic � Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT NWL NWR 02 03 04 06 07 Minimum Split (s) 11.0 24.0 9.5 11.0 24.0 9.5 Total Split (s) 88.0 118.0 18.0 44.0 25.0 67.0 Total Split (%) 48.9% 66% 10% 24% 14% 37% Maximum Green (s) 82.0 112.0 13.5 38.0 19.0 62.5 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 3.5 4.0 4.0 3.5 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.0 Lead/Lag Lag Lead Lag Lead Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None None None C-Max None None Act Effct Green (s) 82.0 180.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.46 1.00 v/c Ratio 0.76 0.42 Control Delay 44.5 0.1 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 44.5 0.1 LOS D A Approach Delay 44.5 0.1 Approach LOS D A Intersection Summa Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 180 Actuated Cycle Length: 180 Offset: 52 (29%), Referenced to phase 4:WBR, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 90 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.10 Intersection Signal Delay: 13.8 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 135.4% ICU Level of Service H Analysis Period (min) 15 ! Phase conflict between lane groups. Splits and Phases: 11: 15 z53 ;;59 15 r53 t57 :58 =14 14 �56 =11 z14 =56 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 2 2040 AM Best Case Lanes, Volumes, Timings 14: 07/15/2021 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR Lane Configurations tiff tiff Traffic Volume (vph) 0 1728 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2515 0 Future Volume (vph) 0 1728 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2515 0 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.86 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.86 1.00 Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) 0 6408 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6408 0 Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) 0 6408 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6408 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) 45 45 45 45 Link Distance (ft) 222 264 227 277 Travel Time (s) 3.4 4.0 3.4 4.2 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 1878 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2734 0 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 1878 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2734 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 0 0 0 0 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 2 2 Detector Template Thru Thru Leading Detector (ft) 100 100 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 6 6 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 Turn Type NA NA Protected Phases 8 6 7 Permitted Phases Detector Phase 8 6 7 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 2040 AM Best Case Lanes, Volumes, Timings 14: Lane Group 02 03 04 06 07 Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) Future Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Lane Util. Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Right Turn on Red Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) Link Distance (ft) Travel Time (s) Peak Hour Factor Adj. Flow (vph) Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) Enter Blocked Intersection Lane Alignment Median Width(ft) Link Offset(ft) Crosswalk Width(ft) Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor Turning Speed (mph) Number of Detectors Detector Template Leading Detector (ft) Trailing Detector (ft) Detector 1 Position(ft) Detector 1 Size(ft) Detector 1 Type Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) Detector 1 Queue (s) Detector 1 Delay (s) Detector 2 Position(ft) Detector 2 Size(ft) Detector 2 Type Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Detector Phase Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 07/15/2021 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 2 2040 AM Best Case Lanes, Volumes, Timings 14: 07/15/2021 __1' ►� + . ' Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR Minimum Split (s) 11.0 Total Split (s) 88.0 Total Split (%) 48.9% Maximum Green (s) 82.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.0 Lead/Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 Recall Mode None Act Effct Green (s) 82.0 86.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.46 0.48 v/c Ratio 0.64 0.89 Control Delay 59.4 38.9 Queue Delay 0.0 2.1 Total Delay 59.4 41.0 LOS E D Approach Delay 59.4 41.0 Approach LOS E D Intersection Summa Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 180 Actuated Cycle Length: 180 Offset: 52 (29%), Referenced to phase 4:WBR, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 90 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.10 Intersection Signal Delay: 48.5 Intersection LOS: D Intersection Capacity Utilization 75.3% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 14 =15 Z58 =59 �15 �58 =57 =58 0*02 0 04 Ir-1 1�14 =14 �56 =11 ;;14 =56 06 07 __j' 438 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 3 2040 AM Best Case Lanes, Volumes, Timings 14: 07/15/2021 Lane Group 02 03 04 06 07 Minimum Split (s) 24.0 9.5 11.0 24.0 9.5 Total Split (s) 118.0 18.0 44.0 25.0 67.0 Total Split (%) 66% 10% 24% 14% 37% Maximum Green (s) 112.0 13.5 38.0 19.0 62.5 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 3.5 4.0 4.0 3.5 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None None C-Max None None Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/C Ratio We Ratio Control Delay Queue Delay Total Delay LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS Intersection Summary Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 4 2040 AM Best Case Lanes, Volumes, Timings 15: 07/15/2021 Lane Group EBL EBT WBT WBR SEL SER 02 03 04 06 07 08 Lane Configurations tiff Traffic Volume (vph) 0 1728 0 0 1161 0 Future Volume (vph) 0 1728 0 0 1161 0 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.86 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 Frt Flt Protected 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 6408 0 0 3433 0 Flt Permitted 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 6408 0 0 3433 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 175 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 45 Link Distance (ft) 264 207 425 Travel Time (s) 4.0 3.1 6.4 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 1878 0 0 1262 0 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 1878 0 0 1262 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Left Right Right Right Median Width(ft) 0 0 24 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 0 1 Detector Template Thru Left Leading Detector (ft) 0 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 6 20 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 Turn Type NA Prot Protected Phases Free! 3 2! 2 3 4 6 7 8 Permitted Phases Detector Phase 3 2 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 24.0 9.5 11.0 24.0 9.5 11.0 Total Split (s) 118.0 18.0 44.0 25.0 67.0 88.0 Total Split (%) 66% 10% 24% 14% 37% 49% Maximum Green (s) 112.0 13.5 38.0 19.0 62.5 82.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 3.5 4.0 4.0 3.5 4.0 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 2040 AM Best Case Lanes, Volumes, Timings 15: 07/15/2021 Lane Group EBL EBT WBT WBR SEL SER 02 03 04 06 07 08 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None None C-Max None None None Act Effct Green (s) 180.0 131.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 1.00 0.73 v/c Ratio 0.29 0.49 Control Delay 0.1 9.2 Queue Delay 0.0 0.1 Total Delay 0.1 9.4 LOS A A Approach Delay 0.1 9.4 Approach LOS A A Intersection Summa Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 180 Actuated Cycle Length: 180 Offset: 52 (29%), Referenced to phase 4:WBR, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 90 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.10 Intersection Signal Delay: 3.8 Intersection LOS: A Intersection Capacity Utilization 65.2% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 ! Phase conflict between lane groups. Splits and Phases: 15 =15 z53 ;;59 �15 �58 =57 =58 0*02 0 � 04 Ir—1 14 —_14 =56 =11 ;;14 =56 436 Gal __j' 08 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 2 2040 AM Best Case Lanes, Volumes, Timings 56: --10- -�k ic 07/15/2021 Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT NWL NWR 02 03 04 06 07 08 Lane Configurations tiff Traffic Volume (vph) 0 0 0 2527 745 0 Future Volume (vph) 0 0 0 2527 745 0 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.86 0.97 1.00 Frt Flt Protected 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 0 0 6408 3433 0 Flt Permitted 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 0 0 6408 3433 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 51 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 45 Link Distance (ft) 205 245 365 Travel Time (s) 3.1 3.7 5.5 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 0 0 2747 810 0 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 0 0 2747 810 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Right Left Left Right Right Median Width(ft) 0 0 24 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 9 15 15 9 Number of Detectors 0 1 Detector Template Thru Left Leading Detector (ft) 0 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 5 20 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 Turn Type NA Prot Protected Phases Free! 7 8! 2 3 4 6 7 8 Permitted Phases Detector Phase 7 8 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 24.0 9.5 11.0 24.0 9.5 11.0 Total Split (s) 118.0 18.0 44.0 25.0 67.0 88.0 Total Split (%) 66% 10% 24% 14% 37% 49% Maximum Green (s) 112.0 13.5 38.0 19.0 62.5 82.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 3.5 4.0 4.0 3.5 4.0 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 2040 AM Best Case Lanes, Volumes, Timings 56: 07/15/2021 10. —�k ic � Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT NWL NWR 02 03 04 06 07 08 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None None C-Max None None None Act Effct Green (s) 180.0 150.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 1.00 0.84 v/c Ratio 0.43 0.28 Control Delay 0.0 3.2 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 0.0 3.2 LOS A A Approach Delay 3.2 Approach LOS A Intersection Summa Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 180 Actuated Cycle Length: 180 Offset: 52 (29%), Referenced to phase 4:WBR, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 90 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.10 Intersection Signal Delay: 0.8 Intersection LOS: A Intersection Capacity Utilization 65.0% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 ! Phase conflict between lane groups. Splits and Phases: 56 =15 z53 ;;59 �15 �58 =57 =58 0*02 0 � 04 Ir—1 14 —_14 =56 =11 ;;14 =56 436 Gal __j' 08 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 2 2040 AM Best Case Lanes, Volumes, Timings 58: 07/15/2021 Lane Group EBL EBT WBT WBR SEL SER SWL SWR 03 04 06 07 Lane Configurations 1111 rrrr Traffic Volume (vph) 0 0 0 0 2025 0 0 2527 Future Volume (vph) 0 0 0 0 2025 0 0 2527 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.64 Frt 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 0 0 0 6441 0 0 4053 Flt Permitted 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 0 0 0 6441 0 0 4053 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) 45 45 45 45 Link Distance (ft) 245 201 249 200 Travel Time (s) 3.7 3.0 3.8 3.0 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 0 0 0 2201 0 0 2747 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 0 0 0 2201 0 0 2747 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Left Right Left Right Left Right Median Width(ft) 0 0 48 0 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 1 Detector Template Left Right Leading Detector (ft) 20 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 20 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 Turn Type Prot Prot Protected Phases 4 3 2 3 4 6 7 Permitted Phases Detector Phase 4 3 2 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 24.0 9.5 11.0 24.0 9.5 Total Split (s) 118.0 18.0 44.0 25.0 67.0 Total Split (%) 65.6% 10% 24% 14% 37% Maximum Green (s) 112.0 13.5 38.0 19.0 62.5 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 3.5 4.0 4.0 3.5 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 2040 AM Best Case Lanes, Volumes, Timings 58: Lane Group 08 Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) Future Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Lane Util. Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Right Turn on Red Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) Link Distance (ft) Travel Time (s) Peak Hour Factor Adj. Flow (vph) Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) Enter Blocked Intersection Lane Alignment Median Width(ft) Link Offset(ft) Crosswalk Width(ft) Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor Turning Speed (mph) Number of Detectors Detector Template Leading Detector (ft) Trailing Detector (ft) Detector 1 Position(ft) Detector 1 Size(ft) Detector 1 Type Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) Detector 1 Queue (s) Detector 1 Delay (s) Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Detector Phase Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 11.0 Total Split (s) 88.0 Total Split (%) 49% Maximum Green (s) 82.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 07/15/2021 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 2 2040 AM Best Case Lanes, Volumes, Timings 58: 07/15/2021 Lane Group EBL EBT WBT WBR SEL SER SWL SWR 03 04 06 07 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None None C-Max None None Act Effct Green (s) 56.0 112.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.31 0.62 v/c Ratio 1.10 1.09 Control Delay 92.7 67.2 Queue Delay 1.3 0.0 Total Delay 94.0 67.2 LOS F E Approach Delay 94.0 67.2 Approach LOS F E Intersection Summa Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 180 Actuated Cycle Length: 180 Offset: 52 (29%), Referenced to phase 4:WBR, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 90 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.10 Intersection Signal Delay: 79.1 Intersection LOS: E Intersection Capacity Utilization 49.2% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 58 =15 Z58 =59 �15 �58 �5J =58 04 �14 �56 71;--; = 5 6 06 al 438 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 3 2040 AM Best Case Lanes, Volumes, Timings 58: 07/15/2021 Lane Group 08 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 Recall Mode None Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/C Ratio We Ratio Control Delay Queue Delay Total Delay LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS Intersection Summary Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 4 2040 AM Best Case Lanes, Volumes, Timings 57: 07/15/2021 Lane Group EBL EBT WBT WBR SEL SER 02 03 06 07 08 Lane Configurations tiff r* Traffic Volume (vph) 0 0 2527 367 0 0 Future Volume (vph) 0 0 2527 367 0 0 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 0.86 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.850 Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) 0 0 6408 1583 0 0 Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) 0 0 6408 1583 0 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 139 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 200 209 371 Travel Time (s) 4.5 4.8 8.4 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 0 2747 399 0 0 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 0 2747 399 0 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Left Right Left Right Median Width(ft) 0 0 0 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 2 1 Detector Template Thru Right Leading Detector (ft) 100 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 6 20 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 Turn Type NA custom Protected Phases Free 4 2 3 6 7 8 Permitted Phases Detector Phase 4 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 2040 AM Best Case Lanes, Volumes, Timings 57: 07/15/2021 Lane Group EBL EBT WBT WBR SEL SER 02 03 06 07 08 Minimum Split (s) 11.0 24.0 9.5 24.0 9.5 11.0 Total Split (s) 44.0 118.0 18.0 25.0 67.0 88.0 Total Split (%) 24.4% 66% 10% 14% 37% 49% Maximum Green (s) 38.0 112.0 13.5 19.0 62.5 82.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 3.5 4.0 3.5 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.0 Lead/Lag Lag Lead Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode C-Max None None None None None Act Effct Green (s) 180.0 38.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 1.00 0.21 v/c Ratio 0.43 0.90 Control Delay 0.1 76.8 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 0.1 76.8 LOS A E Approach Delay 9.8 Approach LOS A Intersection Summa Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 180 Actuated Cycle Length: 180 Offset: 52 (29%), Referenced to phase 4:WBR, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 90 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.10 Intersection Signal Delay: 9.8 Intersection LOS: A Intersection Capacity Utilization 40.0% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 57 15 Z58 =59 15 �58 =57 =58 0*02 0 04 Ir-1 1�14 =14 �56 =11 �14 =56 06 07 __j' 438 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 2 2040 AM Best Case Lanes, Volumes, Timings 59: 07/15/2021 Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT NEL NER 03 04 06 07 08 Lane Configurations tiff r*r* Traffic Volume (vph) 2025 0 0 0 0 409 Future Volume (vph) 2025 0 0 0 0 409 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Util. Factor 0.86 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.88 Frt 0.850 Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) 6408 0 0 0 0 2787 Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) 6408 0 0 0 0 2787 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 101 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 45 Link Distance (ft) 201 205 384 Travel Time (s) 3.0 3.1 5.8 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 2201 0 0 0 0 445 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 2201 0 0 0 0 445 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Right Left Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 0 0 0 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 9 15 15 9 Number of Detectors 2 1 Detector Template Thru Right Leading Detector (ft) 100 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 6 20 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 Turn Type NA Prot Protected Phases Free! 2! 3 4 6 7 8 Permitted Phases Detector Phase 2 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 2040 AM Best Case Lanes, Volumes, Timings 59: 07/15/2021 10. Jr- 4--- 1 /P� Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT NEL NER 03 04 06 07 08 Minimum Split (s) 24.0 9.5 11.0 24.0 9.5 11.0 Total Split (s) 118.0 18.0 44.0 25.0 67.0 88.0 Total Split (%) 65.6% 10% 24% 14% 37% 49% Maximum Green (s) 112.0 13.5 38.0 19.0 62.5 82.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 3.5 4.0 4.0 3.5 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None None C-Max None None None Act Effct Green (s) 180.0 112.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 1.00 0.62 v/c Ratio 0.34 0.25 Control Delay 3.3 11.8 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 3.3 11.8 LOS A B Approach Delay 3.3 11.8 Approach LOS A B Intersection Summar Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 180 Actuated Cycle Length: 180 Offset: 52 (29%), Referenced to phase 4:WBR, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 90 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.10 Intersection Signal Delay: 4.8 Intersection LOS: A Intersection Capacity Utilization 52.0% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 ! Phase conflict between lane groups. Splits and Phases: 59: 15 Z53 ;;59 15 r53 t57 t58 =14 =14 =56 =11 ;;14 =56 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 2 2040 AM Best Case Lanes, Volumes, Timings 18: Tarpon Bay Blvd/Northbrooke Dr & Immokalee Rd 07/15/2021 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations )) ttt r )) tIM t r tt rr Traffic Volume (vph) 316 1821 181 111 3532 73 380 105 123 101 73 371 Future Volume (vph) 316 1821 181 111 3532 73 380 105 123 101 73 371 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 0 280 360 0 200 120 120 Storage Lanes 2 1 2 0 2 1 2 2 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.86 0.86 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.97 0.95 0.88 Frt 0.850 0.997 0.850 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 3433 5085 1583 3433 6389 0 3433 1863 1583 3433 3539 2787 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 3433 5085 1583 3433 6389 0 3433 1863 1583 3433 3539 2787 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 153 3 150 267 Link Speed (mph) 30 45 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 391 815 578 628 Travel Time (s) 8.9 12.3 13.1 14.3 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 343 1979 197 121 3839 79 413 114 134 110 79 403 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 343 1979 197 121 3918 0 413 114 134 110 79 403 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 24 36 24 24 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 1 1 2 1 2 1 1 2 1 Detector Template Left Thru Right Left Thru Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 20 100 20 100 20 20 100 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 20 6 20 6 20 20 6 20 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Split NA Perm Split NA Perm Protected Phases 1 6 5 2 4 4 8 8 Permitted Phases 6 4 8 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 2040 AM Best Case Lanes, Volumes, Timings 18: Tarpon Bay Blvd/Northbrooke Dr & Immokalee Rd 07/15/2021 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Detector Phase 1 6 6 5 2 4 4 4 8 8 8 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 11.8 41.8 41.8 11.8 41.8 28.3 28.3 28.3 26.3 26.3 26.3 Total Split (s) 24.0 82.0 82.0 42.0 100.0 29.0 29.0 29.0 27.0 27.0 27.0 Total Split (%) 13.3% 45.6% 45.6% 23.3% 55.6% 16.1 % 16.1 % 16.1 % 15.0% 15.0% 15.0% Maximum Green (s) 17.2 75.2 75.2 35.2 93.2 21.7 21.7 21.7 19.7 19.7 19.7 Yellow Time (s) 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 7.3 7.3 7.3 7.3 7.3 7.3 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None C-Max C-Max None C-Max Max Max Max Max Max Max Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 28.0 28.0 28.0 14.0 14.0 14.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Act Effct Green (s) 17.2 98.7 98.7 11.7 93.2 21.7 21.7 21.7 19.7 19.7 19.7 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.10 0.55 0.55 0.06 0.52 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.11 0.11 0.11 v/c Ratio 1.05 0.71 0.21 0.54 1.18 1.00 0.51 0.42 0.29 0.20 0.74 Control Delay 165.9 16.8 1.3 107.0 97.3 121.2 82.9 10.5 76.0 74.5 34.9 Queue Delay 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 165.9 17.0 1.3 107.0 97.3 121.2 82.9 10.5 76.0 74.5 34.9 LOS F B A F F F F B E E C Approach Delay 36.0 97.6 92.2 47.8 Approach LOS D F F D Intersection Summa Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 180 Actuated Cycle Length: 180 Offset: 86 (48%), Referenced to phase 2:WBT and 6:EBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 150 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.18 Intersection Signal Delay: 73.5 Intersection LOS: E Intersection Capacity Utilization 96.3% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 18: Tarpon Bay Blvd/Northbrooke Dr & Immokalee Rd 01 02 04 s38 �5"--IP06fR Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 2 2040 AM Best Case Lanes, Volumes, Timings 24: Valewood Dr & Immokalee Rd 07/15/2021 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations ) ttt r ) tIM r Traffic Volume (vph) 345 2032 2 73 3625 30 43 70 14 89 44 343 Future Volume (vph) 345 2032 2 73 3625 30 43 70 14 89 44 343 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 280 185 540 300 0 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.86 0.86 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 Frt 0.850 0.999 0.975 0.883 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 5085 1583 1770 6401 0 1770 1816 0 1770 1563 1504 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 5085 1583 1770 6401 0 1770 1816 0 1770 1563 1504 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 161 1 4 80 205 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 620 977 513 541 Travel Time (s) 9.4 14.8 11.7 12.3 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 375 2209 2 79 3940 33 47 76 15 97 48 373 Shared Lane Traffic (%) 45% Lane Group Flow (vph) 375 2209 2 79 3973 0 47 91 0 97 216 205 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 24 24 12 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 1 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 Detector Template Left Thru Right Left Thru Left Thru Left Thru Right Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 20 100 20 100 20 100 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 20 6 20 6 20 6 20 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Prot NA Prot NA Perm Protected Phases 1 6 5 2 7 4 3 8 Permitted Phases 6 8 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 2040 AM Best Case Lanes, Volumes, Timings 24: Valewood Dr & Immokalee Rd 07/15/2021 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Detector Phase 1 6 6 5 2 7 4 3 8 8 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 12.1 42.1 42.1 12.1 42.1 12.7 26.7 12.7 29.7 29.7 Total Split (s) 36.0 48.0 48.0 88.0 100.0 14.0 27.0 17.0 30.0 30.0 Total Split (%) 20.0% 26.7% 26.7% 48.9% 55.6% 7.8% 15.0% 9.4% 16.7% 16.7% Maximum Green (s) 28.9 40.9 40.9 80.9 92.9 6.3 19.3 9.3 22.3 22.3 Yellow Time (s) 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.4 4.4 4.4 4.4 4.4 All -Red Time (s) 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 7.1 7.1 7.1 7.1 7.1 7.7 7.7 7.7 7.7 7.7 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None C-Max C-Max None C-Max None Max None Max Max Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 28.0 28.0 28.0 12.0 15.0 15.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Act Effct Green (s) 28.9 108.3 108.3 13.5 92.9 6.3 19.3 9.3 22.3 22.3 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.16 0.60 0.60 0.08 0.52 0.04 0.11 0.05 0.12 0.12 v/c Ratio 1.32 0.72 0.00 0.60 1.20 0.77 0.46 1.07 0.82 0.56 Control Delay 222.5 16.4 0.0 103.5 120.1 145.2 80.2 188.3 71.9 14.4 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 222.5 16.4 0.0 103.5 120.1 145.2 80.2 188.3 71.9 14.4 LOS F B A F F F F F E B Approach Delay 46.3 119.8 102.4 70.9 Approach LOS D F F E Intersection Summa Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 180 Actuated Cycle Length: 180 Offset: 101 (56%), Referenced to phase 2:WBT and 6:EBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 150 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.32 Intersection Signal Delay: 89.9 Intersection LOS: F Intersection Capacity Utilization 110.3% ICU Level of Service H Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 24: Valewood Dr & Immokalee Rd 01 0 'O3 04 05 6 07 7 08 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 2 2040 AM Best Case Lanes, Volumes, Timings 44: Immokalee Rd 07/15/2021 Lane Group EBL EBT WBT WBR SWL SWR 01 02 03 04 07 08 Lane Configurations )) tit tiff r Traffic Volume (vph) 205 1624 3683 0 0 350 Future Volume (vph) 205 1624 3683 0 0 350 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 250 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 2 0 0 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.91 0.86 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.865 Flt Protected 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 3433 5085 6408 0 0 1611 Flt Permitted 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 3433 5085 6408 0 0 1611 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) 45 45 45 Link Distance (ft) 2456 535 184 Travel Time (s) 37.2 8.1 2.8 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 223 1765 4003 0 0 380 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 223 1765 4003 0 0 380 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Left Right Left Right Median Width(ft) 24 24 0 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 2 1 Detector Template Left Thru Thru Right Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 100 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 6 20 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 Turn Type Prot NA NA pt+ov Protected Phases 18 Free 2 7 18 1 2 3 4 7 8 Permitted Phases Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 2040 AM Best Case Lanes, Volumes, Timings 44: Immokalee Rd 07/15/2021 Lane Group EBL EBT WBT WBR SWL SWR 01 02 03 04 07 08 Detector Phase 18 2 7 18 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 24.0 25.0 11.0 24.0 11.0 24.0 Total Split (s) 25.0 111.0 12.0 32.0 12.0 32.0 Total Split (%) 14% 62% 7% 18% 7% 18% Maximum Green (s) 19.0 105.0 6.0 26.0 6.0 26.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None C-Max None None None None Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 Act Effct Green (s) 51.0 180.0 117.0 51.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.28 1.00 0.65 0.28 v/c Ratio 0.23 0.35 0.96 0.83 Control Delay 49.2 0.1 20.2 76.8 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 43.9 1.8 Total Delay 49.2 0.1 64.1 78.7 LOS D A E E Approach Delay 5.6 64.1 78.7 Approach LOS A E E Intersection Summa Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 180 Actuated Cycle Length: 180 Offset: 168 (93%), Referenced to phase 2:EBWB, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 145 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.99 Intersection Signal Delay: 46.7 Intersection LOS: D Intersection Capacity Utilization 85.0% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 44: Immokalee Rd =.29 =44 ;:47 ;;47 r53 ;:54 ;--29 ;:4 - 37-4Y4t53 r54 I ` 04� 1 � T • �5I4 03 }f� `� I I 7 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 2 2040 AM Best Case Lanes, Volumes, Timings 53: Immokalee Rd 07/15/2021 Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT NEL NER 01 02 03 04 07 08 Lane Configurations ttt )) ttt r Traffic Volume (vph) 1629 0 370 3511 0 206 Future Volume (vph) 1629 0 370 3511 0 206 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 250 0 0 Storage Lanes 0 2 0 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.865 Flt Protected 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 5085 0 3433 5085 0 1611 Flt Permitted 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 5085 0 3433 5085 0 1611 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 27 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 45 Link Distance (ft) 534 686 176 Travel Time (s) 8.1 10.4 2.7 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 1771 0 402 3816 0 224 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 1771 0 402 3816 0 224 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Right Left Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 24 24 0 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 9 15 15 9 Number of Detectors 2 1 2 1 Detector Template Thru Left Thru Right Leading Detector (ft) 100 20 100 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 6 20 6 20 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 Turn Type NA Prot NA pt+ov Protected Phases 2 3 14 Free 14 1 2 3 4 7 8 Permitted Phases Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 2040 AM Best Case Lanes, Volumes, Timings 53: Immokalee Rd 07/15/2021 __10. Jr-- 4--- 1 /P� Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT NEL NER 01 02 03 04 07 08 Detector Phase 2 3 14 14 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 24.0 25.0 11.0 24.0 11.0 24.0 Total Split (s) 25.0 111.0 12.0 32.0 12.0 32.0 Total Split (%) 14% 62% 7% 18% 7% 18% Maximum Green (s) 19.0 105.0 6.0 26.0 6.0 26.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None C-Max None None None None Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 Act Effct Green (s) 117.0 51.0 180.0 51.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.65 0.28 1.00 0.28 v/c Ratio 0.54 0.41 0.75 0.47 Control Delay 25.6 53.9 1.1 50.4 Queue Delay 0.1 0.0 1.6 0.0 Total Delay 25.7 53.9 2.7 50.4 LOS C D A D Approach Delay 25.7 7.6 50.4 Approach LOS C A D Intersection Summa Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 180 Actuated Cycle Length: 180 Offset: 168 (93%), Referenced to phase 2:EBWB, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 145 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.99 Intersection Signal Delay: 14.3 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 71.2% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 53: Immokalee Rd =.29 =44 ;:47 ;;47 r53 ;:54 ;--29 ;:4 - 37-4Y4t53 r54 I �• ` 4-11 1� T �5I4 03 }f� `� I I 7 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 2 2040 AM Best Case Lanes, Volumes, Timings 47: t 07/15/2021 Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR 01 03 04 07 08 Lane Configurations tt ttt r* Traffic Volume (vph) 205 0 0 271 389 350 Future Volume (vph) 205 0 0 271 389 350 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.91 1.00 Frt 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 3433 0 0 3539 5085 1583 Flt Permitted 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 3433 0 0 3539 5085 1583 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 380 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 45 Link Distance (ft) 424 150 254 Travel Time (s) 6.4 2.3 3.8 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 223 0 0 295 423 380 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 223 0 0 295 423 380 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Right Left Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 24 12 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 1 2 1 Detector Template Left Thru Thru Right Leading Detector (ft) 20 5 100 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 5 6 20 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 Turn Type Prot NA NA Free Protected Phases 2 1 7 8 3 4 1 3 4 7 8 Permitted Phases Free Detector Phase 2 1 7 8 3 4 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 2040 AM Best Case Lanes, Volumes, Timings 47: 07/15/2021 I Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR 01 03 04 07 08 Minimum Split (s) 25.0 24.0 11.0 24.0 11.0 24.0 Total Split (s) 111.0 25.0 12.0 32.0 12.0 32.0 Total Split (%) 61.7% 14% 7% 18% 7% 18% Maximum Green (s) 105.0 19.0 6.0 26.0 6.0 26.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.0 Lead/Lag Lag Lead Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode C-Max None None None None None Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 Act Effct Green (s) 105.0 63.0 38.0 180.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.58 0.35 0.21 1.00 v/c Ratio 0.11 0.24 0.39 0.24 Control Delay 38.9 24.0 62.4 0.4 Queue Delay 0.0 5.9 0.1 0.0 Total Delay 38.9 29.9 62.5 0.4 LOS D C E A Approach Delay 38.9 29.9 33.1 Approach LOS D C C Intersection Summa Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 180 Actuated Cycle Length: 180 Offset: 168 (93%), Referenced to phase 2:EBWB, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 145 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.99 Intersection Signal Delay: 33.4 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 23.4% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 47 =29 =44 ;:47 = :N5#44 ;;47 r53 =54 29 I 3=4M4=53 254 =79 -:0-*51Z47 =5I4 0314bI`I± 7 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 2 2040 AM Best Case Lanes, Volumes, Timings 54: t 07/15/2021 Lane Group WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT 01 03 04 07 08 Lane Configurations tiff r* tt Traffic Volume (vph) 370 0 443 206 0 384 Future Volume (vph) 370 0 443 206 0 384 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 1.00 0.86 1.00 1.00 0.95 Frt 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 3433 0 6408 1583 0 3539 Flt Permitted 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 3433 0 6408 1583 0 3539 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 224 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 45 Link Distance (ft) 425 406 127 Travel Time (s) 6.4 6.2 1.9 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 402 0 482 224 0 417 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 402 0 482 224 0 417 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Right Left Right Left Left Median Width(ft) 24 12 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 9 15 Number of Detectors 1 2 1 1 Detector Template Left Thru Right Thru Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 5 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 5 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 Turn Type Prot NA Free NA Protected Phases 2 3 4 1 7 8 1 3 4 7 8 Permitted Phases Free Detector Phase 2 3 4 1 7 8 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 2040 AM Best Case Lanes, Volumes, Timings 54: 07/15/2021 Lane Group WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT 01 03 04 07 08 Minimum Split (s) 25.0 24.0 11.0 24.0 11.0 24.0 Total Split (s) 111.0 25.0 12.0 32.0 12.0 32.0 Total Split (%) 61.7% 14% 7% 18% 7% 18% Maximum Green (s) 105.0 19.0 6.0 26.0 6.0 26.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.0 Lead/Lag Lag Lead Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode C-Max None None None None None Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 Act Effct Green (s) 105.0 38.0 180.0 63.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.58 0.21 1.00 0.35 v/c Ratio 0.20 0.36 0.14 0.34 Control Delay 44.2 61.5 0.2 21.8 Queue Delay 0.0 0.1 0.0 3.3 Total Delay 44.2 61.5 0.2 25.1 LOS D E A C Approach Delay 44.2 42.1 25.1 Approach LOS D D C Intersection Summa Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 180 Actuated Cycle Length: 180 Offset: 168 (93%), Referenced to phase 2:EBWB, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 145 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.99 Intersection Signal Delay: 38.0 Intersection LOS: D Intersection Capacity Utilization 31.2% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 54 =29 =44 ;:47 =P:3;54t44 ;;47 r53 =54 29 I 3=4M4=53 254 IMF =79 -:0-*51Z47 =5I4 0314bI`I± 7 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 2 2040 AM Best Case Lanes, Volumes, Timings 29: 07/15/2021 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations ttt r* ttt r* tt tt Traffic Volume (vph) 0 1443 181 0 3352 159 331 112 0 186 203 0 Future Volume (vph) 0 1443 181 0 3352 159 331 112 0 186 203 0 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 250 0 250 0 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 0 1 0 1 2 0 2 0 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.95 1.00 0.97 0.95 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 5085 1583 0 5085 1583 3433 3539 0 3433 3539 0 Flt Permitted 0.504 0.675 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 5085 1583 0 5085 1583 1821 3539 0 2439 3539 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 197 103 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 535 534 127 150 Travel Time (s) 8.1 8.1 2.9 3.4 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 1568 197 0 3643 173 360 122 0 202 221 0 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 1568 197 0 3643 173 360 122 0 202 221 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 24 24 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 2 1 2 1 1 2 1 2 Detector Template Thru Right Thru Right Left Thru Left Thru Leading Detector (ft) 100 20 100 20 20 100 20 100 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 6 20 6 20 20 6 20 6 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type NA Perm NA Perm pm+pt NA pm+pt NA Protected Phases 12 12 3 8 7 4 Permitted Phases 1 2 12 8 4 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 2040 AM Best Case Lanes, Volumes, Timings 29: 07/15/2021 Lane Group 01 02 Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) Future Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Storage Length (ft) Storage Lanes Taper Length (ft) Lane Util. Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Right Turn on Red Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) Link Distance (ft) Travel Time (s) Peak Hour Factor Adj. Flow (vph) Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) Enter Blocked Intersection Lane Alignment Median Width(ft) Link Offset(ft) Crosswalk Width(ft) Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor Turning Speed (mph) Number of Detectors Detector Template Leading Detector (ft) Trailing Detector (ft) Detector 1 Position(ft) Detector 1 Size(ft) Detector 1 Type Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) Detector 1 Queue (s) Detector 1 Delay (s) Detector 2 Position(ft) Detector 2 Size(ft) Detector 2 Type Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) Turn Type Protected Phases 1 2 Permitted Phases Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 2 2040 AM Best Case Lanes, Volumes, Timings 29: 07/15/2021 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Detector Phase 12 12 12 12 3 8 7 4 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 11.0 24.0 11.0 24.0 Total Split (s) 12.0 32.0 12.0 32.0 Total Split (%) 6.7% 17.8% 6.7% 17.8% Maximum Green (s) 6.0 26.0 6.0 26.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.0 6.0 9.0 6.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None None None None Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 Act Effct Green (s) 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 32.0 26.0 26.0 26.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.18 0.14 0.14 0.14 v/c Ratio 0.43 0.16 0.99 0.15 0.95 0.24 0.55 0.43 Control Delay 19.6 5.4 34.4 3.2 61.6 8.7 18.3 11.7 Queue Delay 0.2 0.7 40.3 0.1 8.0 3.5 0.9 2.0 Total Delay 19.8 6.1 74.8 3.3 69.5 12.2 19.3 13.8 LOS B A E A E B B B Approach Delay 18.3 71.5 55.0 16.4 Approach LOS B E E B Intersection Summa Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 180 Actuated Cycle Length: 180 Offset: 168 (93%), Referenced to phase 2:EBWB, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 145 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.99 Intersection Signal Delay: 52.2 Intersection LOS: D Intersection Capacity Utilization 94.8% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 29: =.29 =44 ;:47 ;;47 r53 ;:54 ;--29 ;:4 - 37-4Y4t53 r54 I �• ` 4-11 1� T �5I4 03 }f� `� I I 7 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 3 2040 AM Best Case Lanes, Volumes, Timings 29: 07/15/2021 Lane Group 01 02 Detector Phase Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 24.0 25.0 Total Split (s) 25.0 111.0 Total Split (%) 14% 62% Maximum Green (s) 19.0 105.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None C-Max Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/C Ratio v/c Ratio Control Delay Queue Delay Total Delay LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS Intersection Summary Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 4 2040 PM Best Case Lanes, Volumes, Timings 3: 07/16/2021 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations )) ttt r* )) ttt r* t r*r* ))) t r* Traffic Volume (vph) 496 2431 325 322 1412 653 339 253 647 554 242 636 Future Volume (vph) 496 2431 325 322 1412 653 339 253 647 554 242 636 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 350 0 500 0 0 300 0 0 Storage Lanes 2 1 1 1 2 2 3 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.88 0.94 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.850 0.850 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 3433 5085 1583 3433 5085 1583 3433 1863 2787 4990 1863 1583 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 3433 5085 1583 3433 5085 1583 3433 1863 2787 4990 1863 1583 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 155 350 287 422 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 45 45 Link Distance (ft) 506 823 498 502 Travel Time (s) 7.7 12.5 7.5 7.6 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 539 2642 353 350 1535 710 368 275 703 602 263 691 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 539 2642 353 350 1535 710 368 275 703 602 263 691 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 24 24 64 64 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 Detector Template Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 20 100 20 20 100 20 20 100 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 20 6 20 20 6 20 20 6 20 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot Protected Phases 1 6 5 Permitted Phases 6 NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Free 2 7 4 3 8 Free Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 2040 PM Best Case Lanes, Volumes, Timings 3: 07/16/2021 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Detector Phase 1 6 6 5 2 2 7 4 4 3 8 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 11.0 41.0 41.0 11.0 41.0 41.0 11.0 31.0 31.0 11.0 32.0 Total Split (s) 41.0 93.0 93.0 24.0 76.0 76.0 28.0 34.0 34.0 29.0 35.0 Total Split(%) 22.8% 51.7% 51.7% 13.3% 42.2% 42.2% 15.6% 18.9% 18.9% 16.1% 19.4% Maximum Green (s) 35.0 87.0 87.0 18.0 70.0 70.0 22.0 28.0 28.0 23.0 29.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None C-Max C-Max None C-Max C-Max None None None None Max Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 28.0 28.0 28.0 28.0 12.0 12.0 19.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Act Effct Green (s) 32.1 87.0 87.0 18.0 72.9 72.9 21.5 28.0 28.0 23.0 29.5 180.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.18 0.48 0.48 0.10 0.40 0.40 0.12 0.16 0.16 0.13 0.16 1.00 v/c Ratio 0.88 1.08 0.42 1.02 0.75 0.84 0.90 0.95 1.04 0.95 0.86 0.44 Control Delay 88.5 86.2 17.6 130.2 22.8 12.4 102.3 115.4 87.3 101.2 99.0 0.9 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 88.5 86.2 17.6 130.2 22.8 12.4 102.3 115.4 87.3 101.2 99.0 0.9 LOS F F B F C B F F F F F A Approach Delay 79.7 34.4 97.2 56.3 Approach LOS E C F E Intersection Summa Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 180 Actuated Cycle Length: 180 Offset: 176 (98%), Referenced to phase 2:WBT and 6:EBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 145 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.08 Intersection Signal Delay: 65.2 Intersection LOS: E Intersection Capacity Utilization 100.0% ICU Level of Service G Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 3: 01 011 03 04 s 5 06 ' R'9 07 T 08 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 2 2040 PM Best Case Lanes, Volumes, Timings 6: Immokalee Rd 07/16/2021 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations )) ttt r* )) tIM t r* Traffic Volume (vph) 252 2996 391 307 1954 221 197 35 212 263 38 309 Future Volume (vph) 252 2996 391 307 1954 221 197 35 212 263 38 309 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 300 440 500 0 0 125 300 0 Storage Lanes 2 1 2 0 2 1 1 0 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.86 0.86 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.985 0.850 0.866 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 3433 5085 1583 3433 6312 0 3433 1863 1583 3433 1613 0 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 3433 5085 1583 3433 6312 0 3433 1863 1583 3433 1613 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 269 22 150 158 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 601 360 567 549 Travel Time (s) 9.1 5.5 12.9 12.5 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 274 3257 425 334 2124 240 214 38 230 286 41 336 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 274 3257 425 334 2364 0 214 38 230 286 377 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 36 36 24 24 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 1 1 2 1 2 1 1 2 Detector Template Left Thru Right Left Thru Left Thru Right Left Thru Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 20 100 20 100 20 20 100 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 20 6 20 6 20 20 6 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Prot NA Perm Prot NA Protected Phases 1 6 5 2 7 4 3 8 Permitted Phases 6 4 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 2040 PM Best Case Lanes, Volumes, Timings 6: Immokalee Rd 07/16/2021 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Detector Phase 1 6 6 5 2 7 4 4 3 8 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 11.8 36.8 36.8 11.8 36.8 12.1 26.1 26.1 12.1 26.1 Total Split (s) 24.0 98.0 98.0 23.0 97.0 29.0 27.0 27.0 32.0 30.0 Total Split(%) 13.3% 54.4% 54.4% 12.8% 53.9% 16.1% 15.0% 15.0% 17.8% 16.7% Maximum Green (s) 17.2 91.2 91.2 16.2 90.2 21.9 19.9 19.9 24.9 22.9 Yellow Time (s) 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.4 4.4 4.4 4.4 4.4 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 7.1 7.1 7.1 7.1 7.1 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None C-Max C-Max None C-Max None None None None None Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 23.0 23.0 23.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Act Effct Green (s) 16.8 91.2 91.2 16.2 90.6 16.5 24.6 24.6 20.2 28.3 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.09 0.51 0.51 0.09 0.50 0.09 0.14 0.14 0.11 0.16 v/c Ratio 0.86 1.26 0.46 1.08 0.74 0.68 0.15 0.66 0.74 0.98 Control Delay 76.7 155.2 13.3 140.6 43.8 90.1 72.2 36.3 89.4 81.9 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 76.7 155.2 13.3 140.6 43.8 90.1 72.2 36.3 89.4 81.9 LOS E F B F D F E D F F Approach Delay 134.5 55.8 63.0 85.1 Approach LOS F E E F Intersection Summa Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 180 Actuated Cycle Length: 180 Offset: 156 (87%), Referenced to phase 2:WBT and 6:EBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 150 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.26 Intersection Signal Delay: 98.6 Intersection LOS: F Intersection Capacity Utilization 116.5% ICU Level of Service H Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 6: Immokalee Rd 01 02 03 04 435 06 07 7 08 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 2 2040 PM Best Case Lanes, Volumes, Timings 11: --10- -�k ic 07/16/2021 Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT NWL NWR 02 03 04 06 07 Lane Configurations tt 1111 Traffic Volume (vph) 0 0 0 568 1655 0 Future Volume (vph) 0 0 0 568 1655 0 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.91 1.00 Frt Flt Protected 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 0 0 3539 6441 0 Flt Permitted 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 0 0 3539 6441 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 2193 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 45 Link Distance (ft) 254 457 227 Travel Time (s) 3.8 6.9 3.4 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 0 0 617 1799 0 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 0 0 617 1799 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Right Left Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 0 0 48 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 9 15 15 9 Number of Detectors 2 1 Detector Template Thru Left Leading Detector (ft) 100 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 6 20 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 Turn Type NA Prot Protected Phases 8! Free! 2 3 4 6 7 Permitted Phases Detector Phase 8 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 2040 PM Best Case Lanes, Volumes, Timings 1 1: 07/16/2021 10. -�k ic � Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT NWL NWR 02 03 04 06 07 Minimum Split (s) 11.0 24.0 9.5 11.0 24.0 9.5 Total Split (s) 104.0 79.0 69.0 32.0 25.0 51.0 Total Split (%) 57.8% 44% 38% 18% 14% 28% Maximum Green (s) 98.0 73.0 64.5 26.0 19.0 46.5 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 3.5 4.0 4.0 3.5 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.0 Lead/Lag Lag Lead Lag Lead Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None None None C-Max None None Act Effct Green (s) 98.9 180.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.55 1.00 v/c Ratio 0.32 0.28 Control Delay 22.8 0.1 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 22.8 0.1 LOS C A Approach Delay 22.8 0.1 Approach LOS C A Intersection Summa Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 180 Actuated Cycle Length: 180 Offset: 52 (29%), Referenced to phase 4:WBR, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 90 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.96 Intersection Signal Delay: 5.9 Intersection LOS: A Intersection Capacity Utilization 112.5% ICU Level of Service H Analysis Period (min) 15 ! Phase conflict between lane groups. Splits and Phases =15 z53 ;;59 t15 =53 =511, r53 4:14 =14 =56 =11 =14 4:56 06 03 31 i Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 2 2040 PM Best Case Lanes, Volumes, Timings 14: 07/16/2021 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR Lane Configurations tiff tiff Traffic Volume (vph) 0 2914 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1655 0 Future Volume (vph) 0 2914 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1655 0 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.86 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.86 1.00 Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) 0 6408 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6408 0 Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) 0 6408 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6408 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) 45 45 45 45 Link Distance (ft) 222 264 227 277 Travel Time (s) 3.4 4.0 3.4 4.2 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 3167 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1799 0 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 3167 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1799 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 0 0 0 0 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 2 2 Detector Template Thru Thru Leading Detector (ft) 100 100 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 6 6 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 Turn Type NA NA Protected Phases 8 6 7 Permitted Phases Detector Phase 8 6 7 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 2040 PM Best Case Lanes, Volumes, Timings 14: Lane Group 02 03 04 06 07 Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) Future Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Lane Util. Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Right Turn on Red Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) Link Distance (ft) Travel Time (s) Peak Hour Factor Adj. Flow (vph) Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) Enter Blocked Intersection Lane Alignment Median Width(ft) Link Offset(ft) Crosswalk Width(ft) Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor Turning Speed (mph) Number of Detectors Detector Template Leading Detector (ft) Trailing Detector (ft) Detector 1 Position(ft) Detector 1 Size(ft) Detector 1 Type Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) Detector 1 Queue (s) Detector 1 Delay (s) Detector 2 Position(ft) Detector 2 Size(ft) Detector 2 Type Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Detector Phase Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 07/16/2021 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 2 2040 PM Best Case Lanes, Volumes, Timings 14: 07/16/2021 __1' ►� + . ' Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR Minimum Split (s) 11.0 Total Split (s) 104.0 Total Split (%) 57.8% Maximum Green (s) 98.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.0 Lead/Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 Recall Mode None Act Effct Green (s) 98.9 69.1 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.55 0.38 v/c Ratio 0.90 0.73 Control Delay 15.4 28.8 Queue Delay 0.0 2.7 Total Delay 15.4 31.5 LOS B C Approach Delay 15.4 31.5 Approach LOS B C Intersection Summa Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 180 Actuated Cycle Length: 180 Offset: 52 (29%), Referenced to phase 4:WBR, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 90 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.96 Intersection Signal Delay: 21.2 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 76.2% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 14 =15 Z58 =59 =15 �58 : 57 =58 �14 =14 =56 :11 =14 =56 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 3 2040 PM Best Case Lanes, Volumes, Timings 14: 07/16/2021 Lane Group 02 03 04 06 07 Minimum Split (s) 24.0 9.5 11.0 24.0 9.5 Total Split (s) 79.0 69.0 32.0 25.0 51.0 Total Split (%) 44% 38% 18% 14% 28% Maximum Green (s) 73.0 64.5 26.0 19.0 46.5 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 3.5 4.0 4.0 3.5 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None None C-Max None None Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/C Ratio We Ratio Control Delay Queue Delay Total Delay LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS Intersection Summary Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 4 2040 PM Best Case Lanes, Volumes, Timings 15: 07/16/2021 Lane Group EBL EBT WBT WBR SEL SER 02 03 04 06 07 08 Lane Configurations tiff Traffic Volume (vph) 0 2914 0 0 1301 0 Future Volume (vph) 0 2914 0 0 1301 0 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.86 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 Frt Flt Protected 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 6408 0 0 3433 0 Flt Permitted 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 6408 0 0 3433 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 28 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 45 Link Distance (ft) 264 207 425 Travel Time (s) 4.0 3.1 6.4 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 3167 0 0 1414 0 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 3167 0 0 1414 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Left Right Right Right Median Width(ft) 0 0 24 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 0 1 Detector Template Thru Left Leading Detector (ft) 0 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 6 20 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 Turn Type NA Prot Protected Phases Free! 3 2! 2 3 4 6 7 8 Permitted Phases Detector Phase 3 2 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 24.0 9.5 11.0 24.0 9.5 11.0 Total Split (s) 79.0 69.0 32.0 25.0 51.0 104.0 Total Split (%) 44% 38% 18% 14% 28% 58% Maximum Green (s) 73.0 64.5 26.0 19.0 46.5 98.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 3.5 4.0 4.0 3.5 4.0 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 2040 PM Best Case Lanes, Volumes, Timings 15: 07/16/2021 Lane Group EBL EBT WBT WBR SEL SER 02 03 04 06 07 08 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None None C-Max None None None Act Effct Green (s) 180.0 143.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 1.00 0.80 v/c Ratio 0.49 0.52 Control Delay 0.1 6.9 Queue Delay 0.0 0.1 Total Delay 0.1 7.0 LOS A A Approach Delay 0.1 7.0 Approach LOS A A Intersection Summa Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 180 Actuated Cycle Length: 180 Offset: 52 (29%), Referenced to phase 4:WBR, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 90 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.96 Intersection Signal Delay: 2.3 Intersection LOS: A Intersection Capacity Utilization 86.4% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 ! Phase conflict between lane groups. Splits and Phases: 15 =15 z53 ;;59 =15 =53 =57 ;--58 �14 =14 =56 T11 =14 =56 06 07 � � 08 W4 , Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 2 2040 PM Best Case Lanes, Volumes, Timings 56: --10- -�k ic 07/16/2021 Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT NWL NWR 02 03 04 06 07 08 Lane Configurations tiff Traffic Volume (vph) 0 0 0 1437 500 0 Future Volume (vph) 0 0 0 1437 500 0 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.86 0.97 1.00 Frt Flt Protected 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 0 0 6408 3433 0 Flt Permitted 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 0 0 6408 3433 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 270 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 45 Link Distance (ft) 205 245 365 Travel Time (s) 3.1 3.7 5.5 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 0 0 1562 543 0 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 0 0 1562 543 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Right Left Left Right Right Median Width(ft) 0 0 24 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 9 15 15 9 Number of Detectors 0 1 Detector Template Thru Left Leading Detector (ft) 0 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 5 20 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 Turn Type NA Prot Protected Phases Free! 7 8! 2 3 4 6 7 8 Permitted Phases Detector Phase 7 8 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 24.0 9.5 11.0 24.0 9.5 11.0 Total Split (s) 79.0 69.0 32.0 25.0 51.0 104.0 Total Split (%) 44% 38% 18% 14% 28% 58% Maximum Green (s) 73.0 64.5 26.0 19.0 46.5 98.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 3.5 4.0 4.0 3.5 4.0 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 2040 PM Best Case Lanes, Volumes, Timings 56: 10. —�k ic 07/16/2021 Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT NWL NWR 02 03 04 06 07 08 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None None C-Max None None None Act Effct Green (s) 180.0 150.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 1.00 0.84 v/c Ratio 0.24 0.19 Control Delay 0.0 1.5 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 0.0 1.5 LOS A A Approach Delay 1.5 Approach LOS A Intersection Summa Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 180 Actuated Cycle Length: 180 Offset: 52 (29%), Referenced to phase 4:WBR, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 90 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.96 Intersection Signal Delay: 0.4 Intersection LOS: A Intersection Capacity Utilization 42.2% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 ! Phase conflict between lane groups. Splits and Phases: 56 =15 z53 ;;59 =15 =53 =57 ;--58 �14 =14 =56 T11 =14 =56 06 07 � � 08 W4 , Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 2 2040 PM Best Case Lanes, Volumes, Timings 58: 07/16/2021 Lane Group EBL EBT WBT WBR SEL SER SWL SWR 03 04 06 07 Lane Configurations 1111 rrrr Traffic Volume (vph) 0 0 0 0 2987 0 0 1437 Future Volume (vph) 0 0 0 0 2987 0 0 1437 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.64 Frt 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 0 0 0 6441 0 0 4053 Flt Permitted 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 0 0 0 6441 0 0 4053 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) 45 45 45 45 Link Distance (ft) 245 201 249 200 Travel Time (s) 3.7 3.0 3.8 3.0 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 0 0 0 3247 0 0 1562 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 0 0 0 3247 0 0 1562 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Left Right Left Right Left Right Median Width(ft) 0 0 48 0 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 1 Detector Template Left Right Leading Detector (ft) 20 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 20 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 Turn Type Prot Prot Protected Phases 4 3 2 3 4 6 7 Permitted Phases Detector Phase 4 3 2 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 24.0 9.5 11.0 24.0 9.5 Total Split (s) 79.0 69.0 32.0 25.0 51.0 Total Split (%) 43.9% 38% 18% 14% 28% Maximum Green (s) 73.0 64.5 26.0 19.0 46.5 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 3.5 4.0 4.0 3.5 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 2040 PM Best Case Lanes, Volumes, Timings 58: Lane Group 08 Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) Future Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Lane Util. Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Right Turn on Red Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) Link Distance (ft) Travel Time (s) Peak Hour Factor Adj. Flow (vph) Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) Enter Blocked Intersection Lane Alignment Median Width(ft) Link Offset(ft) Crosswalk Width(ft) Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor Turning Speed (mph) Number of Detectors Detector Template Leading Detector (ft) Trailing Detector (ft) Detector 1 Position(ft) Detector 1 Size(ft) Detector 1 Type Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) Detector 1 Queue (s) Detector 1 Delay (s) Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Detector Phase Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 11.0 Total Split (s) 104.0 Total Split (%) 58% Maximum Green (s) 98.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 07/16/2021 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 2 2040 PM Best Case Lanes, Volumes, Timings 58: 07/16/2021 Lane Group EBL EBT WBT WBR SEL SER SWL SWR 03 04 06 07 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None None C-Max None None Act Effct Green (s) 95.0 73.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.53 0.41 v/c Ratio 0.96 0.95 Control Delay 32.1 39.8 Queue Delay 13.7 43.9 Total Delay 45.8 83.7 LOS D F Approach Delay 45.8 83.7 Approach LOS D F Intersection Summa Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 180 Actuated Cycle Length: 180 Offset: 52 (29%), Referenced to phase 4:WBR, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 90 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.96 Intersection Signal Delay: 58.1 Intersection LOS: E Intersection Capacity Utilization 47.6% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 58 =15 Z58 =59 =15 -:58 : 57 =58 �14 =14 =56 :;11 =14 =56 06 07 � 08 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 3 2040 PM Best Case Lanes, Volumes, Timings 58: 07/16/2021 Lane Group 08 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 Recall Mode None Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/C Ratio We Ratio Control Delay Queue Delay Total Delay LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS Intersection Summary Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 4 2040 PM Best Case Lanes, Volumes, Timings 57: 07/16/2021 Lane Group EBL EBT WBT WBR SEL SER 02 03 06 07 08 Lane Configurations tiff r* Traffic Volume (vph) 0 0 1437 127 0 0 Future Volume (vph) 0 0 1437 127 0 0 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 0.86 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.850 Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) 0 0 6408 1583 0 0 Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) 0 0 6408 1583 0 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 78 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 200 209 371 Travel Time (s) 4.5 4.8 8.4 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 0 1562 138 0 0 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 0 1562 138 0 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Left Right Left Right Median Width(ft) 0 0 0 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 2 1 Detector Template Thru Right Leading Detector (ft) 100 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 6 20 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 Turn Type NA custom Protected Phases Free 4 2 3 6 7 8 Permitted Phases Detector Phase 4 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 2040 PM Best Case Lanes, Volumes, Timings 57: 07/16/2021 Lane Group EBL EBT WBT WBR SEL SER 02 03 06 07 08 Minimum Split (s) 11.0 24.0 9.5 24.0 9.5 11.0 Total Split (s) 32.0 79.0 69.0 25.0 51.0 104.0 Total Split (%) 17.8% 44% 38% 14% 28% 58% Maximum Green (s) 26.0 73.0 64.5 19.0 46.5 98.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 3.5 4.0 3.5 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.0 Lead/Lag Lag Lead Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode C-Max None None None None None Act Effct Green (s) 180.0 26.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 1.00 0.14 v/c Ratio 0.24 0.47 Control Delay 0.1 68.5 Queue Delay 0.1 0.0 Total Delay 0.1 68.5 LOS A E Approach Delay 5.7 Approach LOS A Intersection Summa Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 180 Actuated Cycle Length: 180 Offset: 52 (29%), Referenced to phase 4:WBR, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 90 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.96 Intersection Signal Delay: 5.7 Intersection LOS: A Intersection Capacity Utilization 24.2% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 57 =15 Z58 =59 =15 �58 ::57 =58 �14 =14 ;:58 :11 =14 =56 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 2 2040 PM Best Case Lanes, Volumes, Timings 59: 07/16/2021 Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT NEL NER 03 04 06 07 08 Lane Configurations tiff r*r* Traffic Volume (vph) 2987 0 0 0 0 425 Future Volume (vph) 2987 0 0 0 0 425 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Util. Factor 0.86 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.88 Frt 0.850 Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) 6408 0 0 0 0 2787 Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) 6408 0 0 0 0 2787 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 22 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 45 Link Distance (ft) 201 205 384 Travel Time (s) 3.0 3.1 5.8 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 3247 0 0 0 0 462 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 3247 0 0 0 0 462 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Right Left Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 0 0 0 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 9 15 15 9 Number of Detectors 2 1 Detector Template Thru Right Leading Detector (ft) 100 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 6 20 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 Turn Type NA Prot Protected Phases Free! 2! 3 4 6 7 8 Permitted Phases Detector Phase 2 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 2040 PM Best Case Lanes, Volumes, Timings 59: 07/16/2021 10. Jr- 4--- 1 /P� Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT NEL NER 03 04 06 07 08 Minimum Split (s) 24.0 9.5 11.0 24.0 9.5 11.0 Total Split (s) 79.0 69.0 32.0 25.0 51.0 104.0 Total Split (%) 43.9% 38% 18% 14% 28% 58% Maximum Green (s) 73.0 64.5 26.0 19.0 46.5 98.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 3.5 4.0 4.0 3.5 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None None C-Max None None None Act Effct Green (s) 180.0 73.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 1.00 0.41 v/c Ratio 0.51 0.40 Control Delay 0.8 37.4 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 0.8 37.4 LOS A D Approach Delay 0.8 37.4 Approach LOS A D Intersection Summa Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 180 Actuated Cycle Length: 180 Offset: 52 (29%), Referenced to phase 4:WBR, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 90 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 0.96 Intersection Signal Delay: 5.4 Intersection LOS: A Intersection Capacity Utilization 66.5% ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 ! Phase conflict between lane groups. iolits and Phases: 59: -58 ;;52 T 03 �-S�F04 Ri �14 z14 =56 11 =14 =56 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 2 2040 PM Best Case Lanes, Volumes, Timings 18: Tarpon Bay Blvd/Northbrooke Dr & Immokalee Rd 07/16/2021 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations )) ttt r )) tIM t r tt rr Traffic Volume (vph) 312 2669 412 130 1572 19 360 145 129 163 77 191 Future Volume (vph) 312 2669 412 130 1572 19 360 145 129 163 77 191 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 0 280 360 0 200 120 120 Storage Lanes 2 1 2 0 2 1 2 2 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.86 0.86 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.97 0.95 0.88 Frt 0.850 0.998 0.850 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 3433 5085 1583 3433 6395 0 3433 1863 1583 3433 3539 2787 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 3433 5085 1583 3433 6395 0 3433 1863 1583 3433 3539 2787 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 209 1 150 208 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 391 815 578 628 Travel Time (s) 5.9 12.3 13.1 14.3 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 339 2901 448 141 1709 21 391 158 140 177 84 208 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 339 2901 448 141 1730 0 391 158 140 177 84 208 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 24 36 24 24 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 1 1 2 1 2 1 1 2 1 Detector Template Left Thru Right Left Thru Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 20 100 20 100 20 20 100 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 20 6 20 6 20 20 6 20 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Split NA Perm Split NA Perm Protected Phases 1 6 5 2 4 4 8 8 Permitted Phases 6 4 8 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 2040 PM Best Case Lanes, Volumes, Timings 18: Tarpon Bay Blvd/Northbrooke Dr & Immokalee Rd 07/16/2021 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Detector Phase 1 6 6 5 2 4 4 4 8 8 8 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 11.8 41.8 41.8 11.8 41.8 28.3 28.3 28.3 26.3 26.3 26.3 Total Split (s) 42.0 107.0 107.0 17.0 82.0 29.0 29.0 29.0 27.0 27.0 27.0 Total Split (%) 23.3% 59.4% 59.4% 9.4% 45.6% 16.1 % 16.1 % 16.1 % 15.0% 15.0% 15.0% Maximum Green (s) 35.2 100.2 100.2 10.2 75.2 21.7 21.7 21.7 19.7 19.7 19.7 Yellow Time (s) 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 7.3 7.3 7.3 7.3 7.3 7.3 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None C-Max C-Max None C-Max Max Max Max Max Max Max Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 28.0 28.0 28.0 14.0 14.0 14.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Act Effct Green (s) 23.1 100.4 100.4 10.0 87.3 21.7 21.7 21.7 19.7 19.7 19.7 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.13 0.56 0.56 0.06 0.48 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.11 0.11 0.11 v/c Ratio 0.77 1.02 0.46 0.74 0.56 0.95 0.71 0.43 0.47 0.22 0.42 Control Delay 71.9 79.1 24.6 101.5 45.2 109.8 93.6 12.1 79.8 74.7 10.9 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 71.9 79.1 24.8 101.5 45.2 109.8 93.6 12.1 79.8 74.7 10.9 LOS E E C F D F F B E E B Approach Delay 71.8 49.4 86.2 48.4 Approach LOS E D F D Intersection Summa Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 180 Actuated Cycle Length: 180 Offset: 86 (48%), Referenced to phase 2:WBT and 6:EBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 150 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.02 Intersection Signal Delay: 65.4 Intersection LOS: E Intersection Capacity Utilization 93.7% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 18: Tarpon Bay Blvd/Northbrooke Dr & Immokalee Rd 01 0 04 08 5 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 2 2040 PM Best Case Lanes, Volumes, Timings 24: Valewood Dr & Immokalee Rd 07/16/2021 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations ) ttt r ) tIM r Traffic Volume (vph) 313 3277 12 54 1479 6 53 145 36 136 83 242 Future Volume (vph) 313 3277 12 54 1479 6 53 145 36 136 83 242 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 280 185 540 300 0 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.86 0.86 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 Frt 0.850 0.999 0.970 0.924 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 5085 1583 1770 6401 0 1770 1807 0 1770 1635 1504 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 5085 1583 1770 6401 0 1770 1807 0 1770 1635 1504 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 118 6 23 171 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 620 977 513 541 Travel Time (s) 9.4 14.8 11.7 12.3 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 340 3562 13 59 1608 7 58 158 39 148 90 263 Shared Lane Traffic (%) 35% Lane Group Flow (vph) 340 3562 13 59 1615 0 58 197 0 148 182 171 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 24 24 12 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 1 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 Detector Template Left Thru Right Left Thru Left Thru Left Thru Right Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 20 100 20 100 20 100 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 20 6 20 6 20 6 20 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Prot NA Prot NA Perm Protected Phases 1 6 5 2 7 4 3 8 Permitted Phases 6 8 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 2040 PM Best Case Lanes, Volumes, Timings 24: Valewood Dr & Immokalee Rd 07/16/2021 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Detector Phase 1 6 6 5 2 7 4 3 8 8 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 12.1 42.1 42.1 12.1 42.1 12.7 26.7 12.7 29.7 29.7 Total Split (s) 59.0 118.0 118.0 14.0 73.0 17.0 27.0 21.0 31.0 31.0 Total Split (%) 32.8% 65.6% 65.6% 7.8% 40.6% 9.4% 15.0% 11.7% 17.2% 17.2% Maximum Green (s) 51.9 110.9 110.9 6.9 65.9 9.3 19.3 13.3 23.3 23.3 Yellow Time (s) 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.4 4.4 4.4 4.4 4.4 All -Red Time (s) 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 7.1 7.1 7.1 7.1 7.1 7.7 7.7 7.7 7.7 7.7 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None C-Max C-Max None C-Max None Max None Max Max Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 28.0 28.0 28.0 12.0 15.0 15.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Act Effct Green (s) 40.0 110.9 110.9 6.9 77.8 8.9 19.3 13.3 23.7 23.7 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.22 0.62 0.62 0.04 0.43 0.05 0.11 0.07 0.13 0.13 v/c Ratio 0.87 1.14 0.01 0.88 0.58 0.67 0.99 1.14 0.77 0.49 Control Delay 65.4 108.7 0.0 146.0 39.1 117.6 136.1 189.6 87.5 13.8 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 65.4 108.7 0.0 146.0 39.1 117.6 136.1 189.6 87.5 13.8 LOS E F A F D F F F F B Approach Delay 104.5 42.8 131.9 92.5 Approach LOS F D F F Intersection Summa Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 180 Actuated Cycle Length: 180 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:WBT and 6:EBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 150 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.14 Intersection Signal Delay: 88.4 Intersection LOS: F Intersection Capacity Utilization 109.5% ICU Level of Service H Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 24: Valewood Dr & Immokalee Rd 0=--0'06 02 03 04 0' ■07 • 08 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 2 2040 PM Best Case Lanes, Volumes, Timings 44: Immokalee Rd 07/16/2021 Lane Group EBL EBT WBT WBR SWL SWR 01 02 03 04 07 08 Lane Configurations )) tit tiff r Traffic Volume (vph) 175 2643 1529 0 0 128 Future Volume (vph) 175 2643 1529 0 0 128 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 250 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 2 0 0 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.91 0.86 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.865 Flt Protected 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 3433 5085 6408 0 0 1611 Flt Permitted 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 3433 5085 6408 0 0 1611 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 18 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 45 Link Distance (ft) 2456 535 184 Travel Time (s) 37.2 8.1 2.8 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 190 2873 1662 0 0 139 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 190 2873 1662 0 0 139 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Left Right Left Right Median Width(ft) 24 24 0 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 2 1 Detector Template Left Thru Thru Right Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 100 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 6 20 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 Turn Type Prot NA NA pt+ov Protected Phases 18 Free 2 7 18 1 2 3 4 7 8 Permitted Phases Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 2040 PM Best Case Lanes, Volumes, Timings 44: Immokalee Rd 07/16/2021 Lane Group EBL EBT WBT WBR SWL SWR 01 02 03 04 07 08 Detector Phase 18 2 7 18 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 24.0 25.0 11.0 24.0 11.0 24.0 Total Split (s) 43.0 93.0 12.0 32.0 12.0 32.0 Total Split (%) 24% 52% 7% 18% 7% 18% Maximum Green (s) 37.0 87.0 6.0 26.0 6.0 26.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None C-Max None None None None Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 Act Effct Green (s) 69.0 180.0 99.0 69.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.38 1.00 0.55 0.38 v/c Ratio 0.14 0.56 0.47 0.22 Control Delay 35.2 0.0 27.1 33.5 Queue Delay 0.0 0.2 0.2 0.0 Total Delay 35.2 0.3 27.3 33.5 LOS D A C C Approach Delay 2.4 27.3 33.5 Approach LOS A C C Intersection Summa Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 180 Actuated Cycle Length: 180 Offset: 168 (93%), Referenced to phase 2:EBWB, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 125 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.09 Intersection Signal Delay: 11.8 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 54.4% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 44: Immokalee Rd z29 =44 ;:47 ;:53 ;;54 =44 =47 t53 �54 �29 �4 - 37-4Y4t53 r54 �::29 t fR I ` t 04� 7 1� 02 T• � 9 14 _-4-54�.=47 ;; 5I4 03 }f `� I I 7 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 2 2040 PM Best Case Lanes, Volumes, Timings 53: Immokalee Rd 07/16/2021 Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT NEL NER 01 02 03 04 07 08 Lane Configurations ttt )) ttt r Traffic Volume (vph) 2486 0 525 1385 0 620 Future Volume (vph) 2486 0 525 1385 0 620 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 250 0 0 Storage Lanes 0 2 0 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.865 Flt Protected 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 5085 0 3433 5085 0 1611 Flt Permitted 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 5085 0 3433 5085 0 1611 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 1 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 45 Link Distance (ft) 534 686 176 Travel Time (s) 8.1 10.4 2.7 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 2702 0 571 1505 0 674 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 2702 0 571 1505 0 674 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Right Left Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 24 24 0 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 9 15 15 9 Number of Detectors 2 1 2 1 Detector Template Thru Left Thru Right Leading Detector (ft) 100 20 100 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 6 20 6 20 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 Turn Type NA Prot NA pt+ov Protected Phases 2 3 14 Free 14 1 2 3 4 7 8 Permitted Phases Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 2040 PM Best Case Lanes, Volumes, Timings 53: Immokalee Rd 07/16/2021 __10. Jr-- 4--- 1 /P� Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT NEL NER 01 02 03 04 07 08 Detector Phase 2 3 14 14 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 24.0 25.0 11.0 24.0 11.0 24.0 Total Split (s) 43.0 93.0 12.0 32.0 12.0 32.0 Total Split (%) 24% 52% 7% 18% 7% 18% Maximum Green (s) 37.0 87.0 6.0 26.0 6.0 26.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None C-Max None None None None Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 Act Effct Green (s) 99.0 69.0 180.0 69.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.55 0.38 1.00 0.38 v/c Ratio 0.97 0.43 0.30 1.09 Control Delay 33.9 42.4 0.1 112.5 Queue Delay 6.9 0.0 0.0 4.1 Total Delay 40.8 42.4 0.1 116.7 LOS D D A F Approach Delay 40.8 11.8 116.7 Approach LOS D B F Intersection Summa Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 180 Actuated Cycle Length: 180 Offset: 168 (93%), Referenced to phase 2:EBWB, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 125 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.09 Intersection Signal Delay: 39.1 Intersection LOS: D Intersection Capacity Utilization 96.4% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 53: Immokalee Rd z29 =44 ;:47 ;:53 ;;54 �::29 x4} =47 t53 �54 04� t 7 1� 02 fR �29 =4 - 3r4S4t53 r54 T• ` t ]25� 03 =29 = ? 4-54=47 ;;5I4 } I `± I 7 3� s Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 2 2040 PM Best Case Lanes, Volumes, Timings 47: t 07/16/2021 Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR 01 03 04 07 08 Lane Configurations tt ttt r* Traffic Volume (vph) 175 0 0 331 431 128 Future Volume (vph) 175 0 0 331 431 128 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.91 1.00 Frt 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 3433 0 0 3539 5085 1583 Flt Permitted 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 3433 0 0 3539 5085 1583 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 139 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 45 Link Distance (ft) 424 150 254 Travel Time (s) 6.4 2.3 3.8 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 190 0 0 360 468 139 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 190 0 0 360 468 139 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Right Left Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 24 12 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 1 2 1 Detector Template Left Thru Thru Right Leading Detector (ft) 20 5 100 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 5 6 20 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 Turn Type Prot NA NA Free Protected Phases 2 1 7 8 3 4 1 3 4 7 8 Permitted Phases Free Detector Phase 2 1 7 8 3 4 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 2040 PM Best Case Lanes, Volumes, Timings 47: 07/16/2021 I Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR 01 03 04 07 08 Minimum Split (s) 25.0 24.0 11.0 24.0 11.0 24.0 Total Split (s) 93.0 43.0 12.0 32.0 12.0 32.0 Total Split (%) 51.7% 24% 7% 18% 7% 18% Maximum Green (s) 87.0 37.0 6.0 26.0 6.0 26.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.0 Lead/Lag Lag Lead Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode C-Max None None None None None Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 Act Effct Green (s) 87.0 81.0 38.0 180.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.48 0.45 0.21 1.00 v/c Ratio 0.11 0.23 0.44 0.09 Control Delay 62.1 6.7 63.2 0.1 Queue Delay 0.0 1.0 0.2 0.0 Total Delay 62.1 7.8 63.4 0.1 LOS E A E A Approach Delay 62.1 7.8 48.9 Approach LOS E A D Intersection Summa Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 180 Actuated Cycle Length: 180 Offset: 168 (93%), Referenced to phase 2:EBWB, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 125 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.09 Intersection Signal Delay: 38.2 Intersection LOS: D Intersection Capacity Utilization 24.1 % ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 47 =29 =44 ;:47 ;:53 =5I4 z29 =44 =47 t53 �54 �29 �4 I 3=4M4=53 254 =Z9 -:0-*51Z47 =5I4 0314bI `± I 7 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 2 2040 PM Best Case Lanes, Volumes, Timings 54: t 07/16/2021 Lane Group WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT 01 03 04 07 08 Lane Configurations tiff r* tt Traffic Volume (vph) 525 0 475 620 0 588 Future Volume (vph) 525 0 475 620 0 588 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 1.00 0.86 1.00 1.00 0.95 Frt 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 3433 0 6408 1583 0 3539 Flt Permitted 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 3433 0 6408 1583 0 3539 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 674 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 45 Link Distance (ft) 425 406 127 Travel Time (s) 6.4 6.2 1.9 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 571 0 516 674 0 639 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 571 0 516 674 0 639 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Right Left Right Left Left Median Width(ft) 24 12 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 9 15 Number of Detectors 1 2 1 1 Detector Template Left Thru Right Thru Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 5 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 5 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 Turn Type Prot NA Free NA Protected Phases 2 3 4 1 7 8 1 3 4 7 8 Permitted Phases Free Detector Phase 2 3 4 1 7 8 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 2040 PM Best Case Lanes, Volumes, Timings 54: 07/16/2021 Lane Group WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT 01 03 04 07 08 Minimum Split (s) 25.0 24.0 11.0 24.0 11.0 24.0 Total Split (s) 93.0 43.0 12.0 32.0 12.0 32.0 Total Split (%) 51.7% 24% 7% 18% 7% 18% Maximum Green (s) 87.0 37.0 6.0 26.0 6.0 26.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.0 Lead/Lag Lag Lead Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode C-Max None None None None None Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 Act Effct Green (s) 87.0 38.0 180.0 81.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.48 0.21 1.00 0.45 v/c Ratio 0.34 0.38 0.43 0.40 Control Delay 60.2 61.9 0.8 11.2 Queue Delay 0.0 0.1 0.5 5.6 Total Delay 60.2 62.0 1.4 16.8 LOS E E A B Approach Delay 60.2 27.7 16.8 Approach LOS E C B Intersection Summa Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 180 Actuated Cycle Length: 180 Offset: 168 (93%), Referenced to phase 2:EBWB, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 125 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.09 Intersection Signal Delay: 32.5 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 41.2% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 54 =29 =44 ;:47 ;:53 =5I4 z29 =44 =47 t53 ;;54 29 �4 I 3=4M4=53 254 =Z9 -:0-*51Z47 =5I4 0314bI `± I 7 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 2 2040 PM Best Case Lanes, Volumes, Timings 29: 07/16/2021 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations ttt r* ttt r* tt tt Traffic Volume (vph) 0 2352 291 0 1311 74 218 257 0 134 297 0 Future Volume (vph) 0 2352 291 0 1311 74 218 257 0 134 297 0 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 250 0 250 0 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 0 1 0 1 2 0 2 0 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.95 1.00 0.97 0.95 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 5085 1583 0 5085 1583 3433 3539 0 3433 3539 0 Flt Permitted 0.341 0.387 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 5085 1583 0 5085 1583 1232 3539 0 1399 3539 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 249 80 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 535 534 127 150 Travel Time (s) 8.1 8.1 2.9 3.4 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 2557 316 0 1425 80 237 279 0 146 323 0 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 2557 316 0 1425 80 237 279 0 146 323 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 24 24 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 2 1 2 1 1 2 1 2 Detector Template Thru Right Thru Right Left Thru Left Thru Leading Detector (ft) 100 20 100 20 20 100 20 100 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 6 20 6 20 20 6 20 6 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type NA Perm NA Perm pm+pt NA pm+pt NA Protected Phases 12 12 3 8 7 4 Permitted Phases 1 2 12 8 4 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 2040 PM Best Case Lanes, Volumes, Timings 29: 07/16/2021 Lane Group 01 02 Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) Future Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Storage Length (ft) Storage Lanes Taper Length (ft) Lane Util. Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Right Turn on Red Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) Link Distance (ft) Travel Time (s) Peak Hour Factor Adj. Flow (vph) Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) Enter Blocked Intersection Lane Alignment Median Width(ft) Link Offset(ft) Crosswalk Width(ft) Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor Turning Speed (mph) Number of Detectors Detector Template Leading Detector (ft) Trailing Detector (ft) Detector 1 Position(ft) Detector 1 Size(ft) Detector 1 Type Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) Detector 1 Queue (s) Detector 1 Delay (s) Detector 2 Position(ft) Detector 2 Size(ft) Detector 2 Type Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) Turn Type Protected Phases 1 2 Permitted Phases Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 2 2040 PM Best Case Lanes, Volumes, Timings 29: 07/16/2021 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Detector Phase 12 12 12 12 3 8 7 4 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 11.0 24.0 11.0 24.0 Total Split (s) 12.0 32.0 12.0 32.0 Total Split (%) 6.7% 17.8% 6.7% 17.8% Maximum Green (s) 6.0 26.0 6.0 26.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.0 6.0 9.0 6.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None None None None Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 Act Effct Green (s) 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 32.0 26.0 26.0 26.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.72 0.18 0.14 0.14 0.14 v/c Ratio 0.70 0.26 0.39 0.07 0.81 0.55 0.62 0.63 Control Delay 21.5 6.7 10.0 1.4 45.5 14.7 30.8 16.5 Queue Delay 11.5 0.4 0.2 0.0 9.0 1.8 0.0 1.0 Total Delay 33.0 7.1 10.2 1.4 54.5 16.4 30.8 17.5 LOS C A B A D B C B Approach Delay 30.2 9.7 33.9 21.6 Approach LOS C A C C Intersection Summa Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 180 Actuated Cycle Length: 180 Offset: 168 (93%), Referenced to phase 2:EBWB, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 125 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.09 Intersection Signal Delay: 24.0 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 74.9% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 29: Z29 =44 ;:47 ;:53 =5I4 z29 =44 =47 t53 ;;54 ;_-29 ;;4 - 374IS4t53 r54 I �5I4 03 }f� `� I I 7 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 3 2040 PM Best Case Lanes, Volumes, Timings 29: 07/16/2021 Lane Group 01 02 Detector Phase Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 24.0 25.0 Total Split (s) 43.0 93.0 Total Split (%) 24% 52% Maximum Green (s) 37.0 87.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None C-Max Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/C Ratio v/c Ratio Control Delay Queue Delay Total Delay LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS Intersection Summary Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 4 2040 AM Worst Case Lanes, Volumes, Timings 3: 07/16/2021 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations )) ttt r* )) ttt r* t r*r* ))) t r* Traffic Volume (vph) 577 1527 297 688 3187 672 542 196 627 1201 452 1472 Future Volume (vph) 577 1527 297 688 3187 672 542 196 627 1201 452 1472 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 350 0 500 0 0 300 0 0 Storage Lanes 2 1 1 1 2 2 3 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.88 0.94 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.850 0.850 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 3433 5085 1583 3433 5085 1583 3433 1863 2787 4990 1863 1583 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 3433 5085 1583 3433 5085 1583 3433 1863 2787 4990 1863 1583 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 150 219 670 326 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 45 45 Link Distance (ft) 509 823 498 502 Travel Time (s) 7.7 12.5 7.5 7.6 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 627 1660 323 748 3464 730 589 213 682 1305 491 1600 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 627 1660 323 748 3464 730 589 213 682 1305 491 1600 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 24 24 64 64 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 Detector Template Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 20 100 20 20 100 20 20 100 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 20 6 20 20 6 20 20 6 20 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot Protected Phases 1 6 5 Permitted Phases 6 NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Free 2 7 4 3 8 Free Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 2040 AM Worst Case Lanes, Volumes, Timings 3: 07/16/2021 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Detector Phase 1 6 6 5 2 2 7 4 4 3 8 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 11.0 41.0 41.0 11.0 41.0 41.0 11.0 25.0 25.0 11.0 36.0 Total Split (s) 30.0 76.0 76.0 66.0 112.0 112.0 28.0 25.0 25.0 43.0 40.0 Total Split (%) 14.3% 36.2% 36.2% 31.4% 53.3% 53.3% 13.3% 11.9% 11.9% 20.5% 19.0% Maximum Green (s) 24.0 70.0 70.0 60.0 106.0 106.0 22.0 19.0 19.0 37.0 34.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None C-Max C-Max None C-Max C-Max None None None None Max Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 28.0 28.0 28.0 28.0 12.0 12.0 19.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Act Effct Green (s) 24.0 78.6 78.6 51.4 106.0 106.0 22.0 19.0 19.0 37.0 34.0 210.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.11 0.37 0.37 0.24 0.50 0.50 0.10 0.09 0.09 0.18 0.16 1.00 v/c Ratio 1.60 0.87 0.47 0.89 1.35 0.80 1.64 1.27 0.79 1.48 1.63 1.01 Control Delay 331.9 67.1 29.0 77.4 187.9 17.7 349.8 227.3 13.6 276.6 346.0 27.9 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 331.9 67.1 29.0 77.4 187.9 17.7 349.8 227.3 13.6 276.6 346.0 27.9 LOS F E C E F B F F B F F C Approach Delay 126.0 146.0 177.7 169.5 Approach LOS F F F F Intersection Summa Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 210 Actuated Cycle Length: 210 Offset: 205 (98%), Referenced to phase 2:WBT and 6:EBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 150 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.64 Intersection Signal Delay: 152.0 Intersection LOS: F Intersection Capacity Utilization 137.3% ICU Level of Service H Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 3: 01 0 2'R 03 04 435 36 fR 07 7 08 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 2 2040 AM Worst Case Lanes, Volumes, Timings 6: Immokalee Rd 07/16/2021 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations )) ttt r* )) tIM t r* r* Traffic Volume (vph) 361 2311 254 206 3889 445 284 51 176 159 25 289 Future Volume (vph) 361 2311 254 206 3889 445 284 51 176 159 25 289 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 300 440 500 0 0 125 300 300 Storage Lanes 2 1 2 0 2 1 1 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.86 0.86 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.97 0.95 0.95 Frt 0.850 0.985 0.850 0.874 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 3433 5085 1583 3433 6312 0 3433 1863 1583 3433 1547 1504 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 3433 5085 1583 3433 6312 0 3433 1863 1583 3433 1547 1504 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 164 25 191 100 127 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 601 360 567 549 Travel Time (s) 9.1 5.5 12.9 12.5 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 392 2512 276 224 4227 484 309 55 191 173 27 314 Shared Lane Traffic (%) 46% Lane Group Flow (vph) 392 2512 276 224 4711 0 309 55 191 173 171 170 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 36 36 24 24 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 1 1 2 1 2 1 1 2 1 Detector Template Left Thru Right Left Thru Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 20 100 20 100 20 20 100 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 20 6 20 6 20 20 6 20 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Protected Phases 1 6 5 2 7 4 3 8 Permitted Phases 6 4 8 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 2040 AM Worst Case Lanes, Volumes, Timings 6: Immokalee Rd 07/16/2021 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Detector Phase 1 6 6 5 2 7 4 4 3 8 8 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 11.8 36.8 36.8 11.8 36.8 12.1 26.1 26.1 12.1 26.1 26.1 Total Split (s) 21.0 94.0 94.0 65.0 138.0 24.0 27.0 27.0 24.0 27.0 27.0 Total Split (%) 10.0% 44.8% 44.8% 31.0% 65.7% 11.4% 12.9% 12.9% 11.4% 12.9% 12.9% Maximum Green (s) 14.2 87.2 87.2 58.2 131.2 16.9 19.9 19.9 16.9 19.9 19.9 Yellow Time (s) 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.4 4.4 4.4 4.4 4.4 4.4 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 7.1 7.1 7.1 7.1 7.1 7.1 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None C-Max C-Max None C-Max None None None None None None Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 23.0 23.0 23.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 Act Effct Green (s) 19.5 131.6 131.6 19.2 131.2 16.9 16.4 16.4 15.1 14.6 14.6 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.09 0.63 0.63 0.09 0.62 0.08 0.08 0.08 0.07 0.07 0.07 v/c Ratio 1.23 0.79 0.26 0.72 1.19 1.12 0.38 0.64 0.70 0.85 0.77 Control Delay 174.7 55.6 16.3 98.6 119.8 171.3 98.6 19.8 110.6 73.9 48.2 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 174.7 55.6 16.3 98.6 119.8 171.3 98.6 19.8 110.6 73.9 48.2 LOS F E B F F F F B F E D Approach Delay 66.9 118.8 112.0 77.7 Approach LOS E F F E Intersection Summa Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 210 Actuated Cycle Length: 210 Offset: 136 (65%), Referenced to phase 2:WBT and 6:EBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 150 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.23 Intersection Signal Delay: 98.1 Intersection LOS: F Intersection Capacity Utilization 112.6% ICU Level of Service H Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 6: Immokalee Rd 01 02 fR 03 04 4�5 O607 T �3 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 2 2040 AM Worst Case Lanes, Volumes, Timings 11: 07/16/2021 Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT NWL NWR 02 03 04 06 07 Lane Configurations tt 1111 Traffic Volume (vph) 0 0 0 1374 3046 0 Future Volume (vph) 0 0 0 1374 3046 0 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.91 1.00 Frt Flt Protected 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 0 0 3539 6441 0 Flt Permitted 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 0 0 3539 6441 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 2201 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 45 Link Distance (ft) 254 457 227 Travel Time (s) 3.8 6.9 3.4 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 0 0 1493 3311 0 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 0 0 1493 3311 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Right Left Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 0 0 48 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 9 15 15 9 Number of Detectors 2 1 Detector Template Thru Left Leading Detector (ft) 100 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 6 20 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 Turn Type NA Prot Protected Phases 8! Free! 2 3 4 6 7 Permitted Phases Detector Phase 8 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 2040 AM Worst Case Lanes, Volumes, Timings 1 1: 07/16/2021 10. -�k ic � Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT NWL NWR 02 03 04 06 07 Minimum Split (s) 11.0 24.0 9.5 11.0 24.0 9.5 Total Split (s) 96.0 115.0 33.0 62.0 35.0 79.0 Total Split (%) 45.7% 55% 16% 30% 17% 38% Maximum Green (s) 90.0 109.0 28.5 56.0 29.0 74.5 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 3.5 4.0 4.0 3.5 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.0 Lead/Lag Lag Lead Lag Lead Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None None None C-Max None None Act Effct Green (s) 90.0 210.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.43 1.00 v/c Ratio 0.98 0.51 Control Delay 78.0 1.5 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 78.0 1.5 LOS E A Approach Delay 78.0 1.5 Approach LOS E A Intersection Summa Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 210 Actuated Cycle Length: 210 Offset: 61 (29%), Referenced to phase 4:WBR, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 150 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.58 Intersection Signal Delay: 25.3 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 163.8% ICU Level of Service H Analysis Period (min) 15 ! Phase conflict between lane groups. Splits and Phases =15 z53 ;;59 t15 :;58 =57 ;;53 o*O2 � 03 04 rR'- 1�14 �14 �56 �11 �14 �56 06 07 � 03 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 2 2040 AM Worst Case Lanes, Volumes, Timings 14: 07/16/2021 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR Lane Configurations tiff tiff Traffic Volume (vph) 0 2156 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3046 0 Future Volume (vph) 0 2156 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3046 0 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.86 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.86 1.00 Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) 0 6408 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6408 0 Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) 0 6408 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6408 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) 45 45 45 45 Link Distance (ft) 222 264 227 277 Travel Time (s) 3.4 4.0 3.4 4.2 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 2343 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3311 0 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 2343 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3311 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 0 0 0 0 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 2 2 Detector Template Thru Thru Leading Detector (ft) 100 100 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 6 6 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 Turn Type NA NA Protected Phases 8 6 7 Permitted Phases Detector Phase 8 6 7 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 2040 AM Worst Case Lanes, Volumes, Timings 14: Lane Group 02 03 04 06 07 Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) Future Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Lane Util. Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Right Turn on Red Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) Link Distance (ft) Travel Time (s) Peak Hour Factor Adj. Flow (vph) Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) Enter Blocked Intersection Lane Alignment Median Width(ft) Link Offset(ft) Crosswalk Width(ft) Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor Turning Speed (mph) Number of Detectors Detector Template Leading Detector (ft) Trailing Detector (ft) Detector 1 Position(ft) Detector 1 Size(ft) Detector 1 Type Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) Detector 1 Queue (s) Detector 1 Delay (s) Detector 2 Position(ft) Detector 2 Size(ft) Detector 2 Type Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Detector Phase Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 07/16/2021 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 2 2040 AM Worst Case Lanes, Volumes, Timings 14: 07/16/2021 __1' ►� + . ' Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR Minimum Split (s) 11.0 Total Split (s) 96.0 Total Split (%) 45.7% Maximum Green (s) 90.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.0 Lead/Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 Recall Mode None Act Effct Green (s) 90.0 108.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.43 0.51 v/c Ratio 0.85 1.00 Control Delay 91.5 40.0 Queue Delay 0.0 6.3 Total Delay 91.5 46.3 LOS F D Approach Delay 91.5 46.3 Approach LOS F D Intersection Summa Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 210 Actuated Cycle Length: 210 Offset: 61 (29%), Referenced to phase 4:WBR, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 150 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.58 Intersection Signal Delay: 65.0 Intersection LOS: E Intersection Capacity Utilization 89.8% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 14 =15 Z53 =59 =15 =58 =57 =58 OL :::14 =14 �56 =11 =14 ;:56 06 07 --p. 03 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 3 2040 AM Worst Case Lanes, Volumes, Timings 14: 07/16/2021 Lane Group 02 03 04 06 07 Minimum Split (s) 24.0 9.5 11.0 24.0 9.5 Total Split (s) 115.0 33.0 62.0 35.0 79.0 Total Split (%) 55% 16% 30% 17% 38% Maximum Green (s) 109.0 28.5 56.0 29.0 74.5 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 3.5 4.0 4.0 3.5 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None None C-Max None None Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/C Ratio v/c Ratio Control Delay Queue Delay Total Delay LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS Intersection Summary Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 4 2040 AM Worst Case Lanes, Volumes, Timings 15: 07/16/2021 Lane Group EBL EBT WBT WBR SEL SER 02 03 04 06 07 08 Lane Configurations tiff Traffic Volume (vph) 0 2156 0 0 1418 0 Future Volume (vph) 0 2156 0 0 1418 0 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.86 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 Frt Flt Protected 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 6408 0 0 3433 0 Flt Permitted 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 6408 0 0 3433 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 91 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 45 Link Distance (ft) 264 207 425 Travel Time (s) 4.0 3.1 6.4 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 2343 0 0 1541 0 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 2343 0 0 1541 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Left Right Right Right Median Width(ft) 0 0 24 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 0 1 Detector Template Thru Left Leading Detector (ft) 0 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 6 20 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 Turn Type NA Prot Protected Phases Free! 3 2! 2 3 4 6 7 8 Permitted Phases Detector Phase 3 2 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 24.0 9.5 11.0 24.0 9.5 11.0 Total Split (s) 115.0 33.0 62.0 35.0 79.0 96.0 Total Split (%) 55% 16% 30% 17% 38% 46% Maximum Green (s) 109.0 28.5 56.0 29.0 74.5 90.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 3.5 4.0 4.0 3.5 4.0 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 2040 AM Worst Case Lanes, Volumes, Timings 15: 07/16/2021 Lane Group EBL EBT WBT WBR SEL SER 02 03 04 06 07 08 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None None C-Max None None None Act Effct Green (s) 210.0 143.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 1.00 0.68 v/c Ratio 0.37 0.65 Control Delay 0.1 19.1 Queue Delay 0.2 50.4 Total Delay 0.3 69.6 LOS A E Approach Delay 0.3 69.6 Approach LOS A E Intersection Summa Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 210 Actuated Cycle Length: 210 Offset: 61 (29%), Referenced to phase 4:WBR, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 150 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.58 Intersection Signal Delay: 27.8 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 78.8% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 ! Phase conflict between lane groups. Splits and Phases: 15 =15 z53 ;;59 =15 =58 =57 ;;53 0*02 03 *6- 04 rR' �14 14 ;:56 ;;1.1 ;:14 ;:56 436 07 __j' 08 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 2 2040 AM Worst Case Lanes, Volumes, Timings 56: 07/16/2021 Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT NWL NWR 02 03 04 06 07 08 Lane Configurations tiff Traffic Volume (vph) 0 0 0 3060 1108 0 Future Volume (vph) 0 0 0 3060 1108 0 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.86 0.97 1.00 Frt Flt Protected 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 0 0 6408 3433 0 Flt Permitted 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 0 0 6408 3433 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 22 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 45 Link Distance (ft) 205 245 365 Travel Time (s) 3.1 3.7 5.5 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 0 0 3326 1204 0 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 0 0 3326 1204 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Right Left Left Right Right Median Width(ft) 0 0 24 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 9 15 15 9 Number of Detectors 0 1 Detector Template Thru Left Leading Detector (ft) 0 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 5 20 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 Turn Type NA Prot Protected Phases Free! 7 8! 2 3 4 6 7 8 Permitted Phases Detector Phase 7 8 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 24.0 9.5 11.0 24.0 9.5 11.0 Total Split (s) 115.0 33.0 62.0 35.0 79.0 96.0 Total Split (%) 55% 16% 30% 17% 38% 46% Maximum Green (s) 109.0 28.5 56.0 29.0 74.5 90.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 3.5 4.0 4.0 3.5 4.0 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 2040 AM Worst Case Lanes, Volumes, Timings 56: 07/16/2021 10. -�k ic � Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT NWL NWR 02 03 04 06 07 08 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None None C-Max None None None Act Effct Green (s) 210.0 170.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 1.00 0.81 v/c Ratio 0.52 0.43 Control Delay 1.6 6.1 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 1.6 6.1 LOS A A Approach Delay 1.6 6.1 Approach LOS A A Intersection Summa Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 210 Actuated Cycle Length: 210 Offset: 61 (29%), Referenced to phase 4:WBR, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 150 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.58 Intersection Signal Delay: 2.8 Intersection LOS: A Intersection Capacity Utilization 83.0% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 ! Phase conflict between lane groups. Splits and Phases: 56 =15 z53 ;;59 =15 =58 =57 ;;53 0*02 03 *6- 04 rR' �14 14 ;:56 ;;1.1 ;:14 ;:56 436 07 __j' 08 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 2 2040 AM Worst Case Lanes, Volumes, Timings 58: 07/16/2021 Lane Group EBL EBT WBT WBR SEL SER SWL SWR 03 04 06 07 Lane Configurations 1111 rrrr Traffic Volume (vph) 0 0 0 0 3618 0 0 3060 Future Volume (vph) 0 0 0 0 3618 0 0 3060 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.64 Frt 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 0 0 0 6441 0 0 4053 Flt Permitted 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 0 0 0 6441 0 0 4053 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) 45 45 45 45 Link Distance (ft) 245 201 249 200 Travel Time (s) 3.7 3.0 3.8 3.0 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 0 0 0 3933 0 0 3326 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 0 0 0 3933 0 0 3326 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Left Right Left Right Left Right Median Width(ft) 0 0 48 0 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 1 Detector Template Left Right Leading Detector (ft) 20 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 20 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 Turn Type Prot Prot Protected Phases 4 3 2 3 4 6 7 Permitted Phases Detector Phase 4 3 2 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 24.0 9.5 11.0 24.0 9.5 Total Split (s) 115.0 33.0 62.0 35.0 79.0 Total Split (%) 54.8% 16% 30% 17% 38% Maximum Green (s) 109.0 28.5 56.0 29.0 74.5 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 3.5 4.0 4.0 3.5 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 2040 AM Worst Case Lanes, Volumes, Timings 58: Lane Group 08 Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) Future Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Lane Util. Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Right Turn on Red Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) Link Distance (ft) Travel Time (s) Peak Hour Factor Adj. Flow (vph) Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) Enter Blocked Intersection Lane Alignment Median Width(ft) Link Offset(ft) Crosswalk Width(ft) Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor Turning Speed (mph) Number of Detectors Detector Template Leading Detector (ft) Trailing Detector (ft) Detector 1 Position(ft) Detector 1 Size(ft) Detector 1 Type Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) Detector 1 Queue (s) Detector 1 Delay (s) Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Detector Phase Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 11.0 Total Split (s) 96.0 Total Split (%) 46% Maximum Green (s) 90.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 07/16/2021 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 2 2040 AM Worst Case Lanes, Volumes, Timings 58: 07/16/2021 Lane Group EBL EBT WBT WBR SEL SER SWL SWR 03 04 06 07 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None None C-Max None None Act Effct Green (s) 89.0 109.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.42 0.52 v/c Ratio 1.44 1.58 Control Delay 236.3 291.5 Queue Delay 0.4 0.0 Total Delay 236.7 291.5 LOS F F Approach Delay 236.7 291.5 Approach LOS F F Intersection Summa Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 210 Actuated Cycle Length: 210 Offset: 61 (29%), Referenced to phase 4:WBR, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 150 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.58 Intersection Signal Delay: 261.8 Intersection LOS: F Intersection Capacity Utilization 58.5% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 58 =15 Z53 =59 =15 =58 =57 =58 0*02 03 *6- 04 rR' :::14 14 ;:56 =11 =14 �56 06 07 � 03 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 3 2040 AM Worst Case Lanes, Volumes, Timings 58: 07/16/2021 Lane Group 08 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 Recall Mode None Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/C Ratio v/c Ratio Control Delay Queue Delay Total Delay LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS Intersection Summary Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 4 2040 AM Worst Case Lanes, Volumes, Timings 57: 07/16/2021 Lane Group EBL EBT WBT WBR SEL SER 02 03 06 07 08 Lane Configurations tiff r* Traffic Volume (vph) 0 0 3060 445 0 0 Future Volume (vph) 0 0 3060 445 0 0 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 0.86 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.850 Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) 0 0 6408 1583 0 0 Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) 0 0 6408 1583 0 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 129 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 200 209 371 Travel Time (s) 4.5 4.8 8.4 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 0 3326 484 0 0 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 0 3326 484 0 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Left Right Left Right Median Width(ft) 0 0 0 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 2 1 Detector Template Thru Right Leading Detector (ft) 100 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 6 20 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 Turn Type NA custom Protected Phases Free 4 2 3 6 7 8 Permitted Phases Detector Phase 4 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 2040 AM Worst Case Lanes, Volumes, Timings 57: 07/16/2021 Lane Group EBL EBT WBT WBR SEL SER 02 03 06 07 08 Minimum Split (s) 11.0 24.0 9.5 24.0 9.5 11.0 Total Split (s) 62.0 115.0 33.0 35.0 79.0 96.0 Total Split (%) 29.5% 55% 16% 17% 38% 46% Maximum Green (s) 56.0 109.0 28.5 29.0 74.5 90.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 3.5 4.0 3.5 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.0 Lead/Lag Lag Lead Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode C-Max None None None None None Act Effct Green (s) 210.0 56.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 1.00 0.27 v/c Ratio 0.52 0.94 Control Delay 0.0 77.3 Queue Delay 4.1 0.4 Total Delay 4.2 77.8 LOS A E Approach Delay 13.5 Approach LOS B Intersection Summa Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 210 Actuated Cycle Length: 210 Offset: 61 (29%), Referenced to phase 4:WBR, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 150 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.58 Intersection Signal Delay: 13.5 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 47.7% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 57 =15 Z53 =59 =15 =58 =57 =58 :::14 =14 =56 =11 =14 ;:56 06 07 __j' 03 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 2 2040 AM Worst Case Lanes, Volumes, Timings 59: 07/16/2021 Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT NEL NER 03 04 06 07 08 Lane Configurations tiff r*r* Traffic Volume (vph) 2452 0 0 0 0 608 Future Volume (vph) 2452 0 0 0 0 608 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Util. Factor 0.86 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.88 Frt 0.850 Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) 6408 0 0 0 0 2787 Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) 6408 0 0 0 0 2787 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 52 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 45 Link Distance (ft) 201 205 384 Travel Time (s) 3.0 3.1 5.8 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 2665 0 0 0 0 661 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 2665 0 0 0 0 661 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Right Left Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 0 0 0 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 9 15 15 9 Number of Detectors 2 1 Detector Template Thru Right Leading Detector (ft) 100 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 6 20 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 Turn Type NA Prot Protected Phases Free! 2! 3 4 6 7 8 Permitted Phases Detector Phase 2 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 2040 AM Worst Case Lanes, Volumes, Timings 59: 07/16/2021 10. Jr- 4--- 1 /P� Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT NEL NER 03 04 06 07 08 Minimum Split (s) 24.0 9.5 11.0 24.0 9.5 11.0 Total Split (s) 115.0 33.0 62.0 35.0 79.0 96.0 Total Split (%) 54.8% 16% 30% 17% 38% 46% Maximum Green (s) 109.0 28.5 56.0 29.0 74.5 90.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 3.5 4.0 4.0 3.5 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None None C-Max None None None Act Effct Green (s) 210.0 109.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 1.00 0.52 v/c Ratio 0.42 0.45 Control Delay 1.0 30.0 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 1.0 30.0 LOS A C Approach Delay 1.0 30.0 Approach LOS A C Intersection Summa Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 210 Actuated Cycle Length: 210 Offset: 61 (29%), Referenced to phase 4:WBR, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 150 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.58 Intersection Signal Delay: 6.8 Intersection LOS: A Intersection Capacity Utilization 65.1 % ICU Level of Service C Analysis Period (min) 15 ! Phase conflict between lane groups. Splits and Phases: 59 =15 z53 ;;59 t15 :;58 =57 ;;53 2 � 03 04 rR'- :::14 =14 =56 z11 �14 �56 06 07 � 03 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 2 2040 AM Worst Case Lanes, Volumes, Timings 18: Tarpon Bay Blvd/Northbrooke Dr & Immokalee Rd 07/16/2021 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations )) ttt r )) tIM t r tt rr Traffic Volume (vph) 383 2205 219 119 3784 78 518 142 167 120 86 438 Future Volume (vph) 383 2205 219 119 3784 78 518 142 167 120 86 438 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 0 280 360 0 200 120 120 Storage Lanes 2 1 2 0 2 1 2 2 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.86 0.86 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.97 0.95 0.88 Frt 0.850 0.997 0.850 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 3433 5085 1583 3433 6389 0 3433 1863 1583 3433 3539 2787 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 3433 5085 1583 3433 6389 0 3433 1863 1583 3433 3539 2787 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 131 3 182 238 Link Speed (mph) 30 45 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 391 815 578 628 Travel Time (s) 8.9 12.3 13.1 14.3 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 416 2397 238 129 4113 85 563 154 182 130 93 476 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 416 2397 238 129 4198 0 563 154 182 130 93 476 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 24 36 24 24 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 1 1 2 1 2 1 1 2 1 Detector Template Left Thru Right Left Thru Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 20 100 20 100 20 20 100 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 20 6 20 6 20 20 6 20 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Split NA Perm Split NA Perm Protected Phases 1 6 5 2 4 4 8 8 Permitted Phases 6 4 8 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 2040 AM Worst Case Lanes, Volumes, Timings 18: Tarpon Bay Blvd/Northbrooke Dr & Immokalee Rd 07/16/2021 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Detector Phase 1 6 6 5 2 4 4 4 8 8 8 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 11.8 41.8 41.8 11.8 41.8 28.3 28.3 28.3 26.3 26.3 26.3 Total Split (s) 26.0 109.0 109.0 42.0 125.0 32.0 32.0 32.0 27.0 27.0 27.0 Total Split (%) 12.4% 51.9% 51.9% 20.0% 59.5% 15.2% 15.2% 15.2% 12.9% 12.9% 12.9% Maximum Green (s) 19.2 102.2 102.2 35.2 118.2 24.7 24.7 24.7 19.7 19.7 19.7 Yellow Time (s) 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 7.3 7.3 7.3 7.3 7.3 7.3 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None C-Max C-Max None C-Max Max Max Max Max Max Max Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 28.0 28.0 28.0 14.0 14.0 14.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Act Effct Green (s) 19.2 124.1 124.1 13.3 118.2 24.7 24.7 24.7 19.7 19.7 19.7 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.09 0.59 0.59 0.06 0.56 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.09 0.09 0.09 v/c Ratio 1.33 0.80 0.24 0.60 1.17 1.40 0.70 0.53 0.40 0.28 1.00 Control Delay 241.6 32.1 5.0 103.1 125.4 252.8 107.0 15.1 93.7 91.0 85.5 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 241.6 32.1 5.0 103.1 125.4 252.8 107.0 15.1 93.7 91.0 85.5 LOS F C A F F F F B F F F Approach Delay 58.5 124.7 179.7 87.7 Approach LOS E F F F Intersection Summa Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 210 Actuated Cycle Length: 210 Offset: 100 (48%), Referenced to phase 2:WBT and 6:EBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 150 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.40 Intersection Signal Delay: 104.8 Intersection LOS: F Intersection Capacity Utilization 109.5% ICU Level of Service H Analysis Period (min) 15 its and Phases: 18: Tarpon Bav Blvd/Northbrooke Dr & Immokalee Rd o5 � --IP06 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 2 2040 AM Worst Case Lanes, Volumes, Timings 24: Valewood Dr & Immokalee Rd 07/16/2021 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations ) ttt r ) tIM r Traffic Volume (vph) 370 2177 2 78 3884 32 58 96 19 105 52 405 Future Volume (vph) 370 2177 2 78 3884 32 58 96 19 105 52 405 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 280 185 540 300 0 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.86 0.86 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 Frt 0.850 0.999 0.975 0.884 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 5085 1583 1770 6401 0 1770 1816 0 1770 1564 1504 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 5085 1583 1770 6401 0 1770 1816 0 1770 1564 1504 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 101 1 4 65 234 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 620 977 513 541 Travel Time (s) 9.4 14.8 11.7 12.3 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 402 2366 2 85 4222 35 63 104 21 114 57 440 Shared Lane Traffic (%) 44% Lane Group Flow (vph) 402 2366 2 85 4257 0 63 125 0 114 251 246 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 24 24 12 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 1 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 Detector Template Left Thru Right Left Thru Left Thru Left Thru Right Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 20 100 20 100 20 100 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 20 6 20 6 20 6 20 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Prot NA Prot NA Perm Protected Phases 1 6 5 2 7 4 3 8 Permitted Phases 6 8 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 2040 AM Worst Case Lanes, Volumes, Timings 24: Valewood Dr & Immokalee Rd 07/16/2021 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Detector Phase 1 6 6 5 2 7 4 3 8 8 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 12.1 42.1 42.1 12.1 42.1 12.7 26.7 12.7 29.7 29.7 Total Split (s) 40.0 124.0 124.0 40.0 124.0 16.0 27.0 19.0 30.0 30.0 Total Split (%) 19.0% 59.0% 59.0% 19.0% 59.0% 7.6% 12.9% 9.0% 14.3% 14.3% Maximum Green (s) 32.9 116.9 116.9 32.9 116.9 8.3 19.3 11.3 22.3 22.3 Yellow Time (s) 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.4 4.4 4.4 4.4 4.4 All -Red Time (s) 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 7.1 7.1 7.1 7.1 7.1 7.7 7.7 7.7 7.7 7.7 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None C-Max C-Max None C-Max None Max None Max Max Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 28.0 28.0 28.0 12.0 15.0 15.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Act Effct Green (s) 32.9 134.4 134.4 15.4 116.9 8.3 19.3 11.3 22.3 22.3 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.16 0.64 0.64 0.07 0.56 0.04 0.09 0.05 0.11 0.11 v/c Ratio 1.45 0.73 0.00 0.65 1.19 0.91 0.74 1.20 1.12 0.67 Control Delay 256.5 53.3 0.0 78.7 127.0 180.0 113.9 230.4 153.2 20.4 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 256.5 53.3 0.0 78.7 127.0 180.0 113.9 230.4 153.2 20.4 LOS F D A E F F F F F C Approach Delay 82.7 126.1 136.1 114.1 Approach LOS F F F F Intersection Summa Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 210 Actuated Cycle Length: 210 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:WBT and 6:EBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 150 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.45 Intersection Signal Delay: 110.2 Intersection LOS: F Intersection Capacity Utilization 117.2% ICU Level of Service H Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 24: Valewood Dr & Immokalee Rd 01 02 (R) 03 �t;04 05 �36 rR 07 7 08 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 2 2040 AM Worst Case Lanes, Volumes, Timings 44: Immokalee Rd 07/16/2021 Lane Group EBL EBT WBT WBR SWL SWR 01 02 03 04 07 08 Lane Configurations )) tit tiff r Traffic Volume (vph) 289 2292 4514 0 0 462 Future Volume (vph) 289 2292 4514 0 0 462 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 250 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 2 0 0 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.91 0.86 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.865 Flt Protected 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 3433 5085 6408 0 0 1611 Flt Permitted 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 3433 5085 6408 0 0 1611 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) 45 45 45 Link Distance (ft) 2456 535 184 Travel Time (s) 37.2 8.1 2.8 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 314 2491 4907 0 0 502 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 314 2491 4907 0 0 502 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Left Right Left Right Median Width(ft) 24 24 0 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 2 1 Detector Template Left Thru Thru Right Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 100 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 6 20 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 Turn Type Prot NA NA pt+ov Protected Phases 18 Free 2 7 18 1 2 3 4 7 8 Permitted Phases Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 2040 AM Worst Case Lanes, Volumes, Timings 44: Immokalee Rd 07/16/2021 Lane Group EBL EBT WBT WBR SWL SWR 01 02 03 04 07 08 Detector Phase 18 2 7 18 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 24.0 25.0 11.0 24.0 11.0 24.0 Total Split (s) 29.0 126.0 23.0 32.0 23.0 32.0 Total Split (%) 14% 60% 11 % 15% 11 % 15% Maximum Green (s) 23.0 120.0 17.0 26.0 17.0 26.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None C-Max None None None None Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 Act Effct Green (s) 55.0 210.0 143.0 55.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.26 1.00 0.68 0.26 v/c Ratio 0.35 0.49 1.12 1.19 Control Delay 54.8 0.3 78.6 169.3 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.6 Total Delay 54.8 0.3 79.0 169.8 LOS D A E F Approach Delay 6.4 79.0 169.8 Approach LOS A E F Intersection Summa Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 210 Actuated Cycle Length: 210 Offset: 196 (93%), Referenced to phase 2:EBWB, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 145 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.37 Intersection Signal Delay: 59.7 Intersection LOS: E Intersection Capacity Utilization 104.0% ICU Level of Service G Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 44: Immokalee Rd #99 =-i} =47 55 # a47 r53 ;:54 29 =4.' ;;5 4r4I 53 I T • =54 4:29 =44 =4 4294944 #47} 7 �38 I � I Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 2 2040 AM Worst Case Lanes, Volumes, Timings 53: Immokalee Rd 07/16/2021 Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT NEL NER 01 02 03 04 07 08 Lane Configurations ttt )) ttt r Traffic Volume (vph) 2282 0 449 4271 0 272 Future Volume (vph) 2282 0 449 4271 0 272 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 250 0 0 Storage Lanes 0 2 0 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.865 Flt Protected 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 5085 0 3433 5085 0 1611 Flt Permitted 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 5085 0 3433 5085 0 1611 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 7 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 45 Link Distance (ft) 534 686 176 Travel Time (s) 8.1 10.4 2.7 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 2480 0 488 4642 0 296 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 2480 0 488 4642 0 296 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Right Left Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 24 24 0 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 9 15 15 9 Number of Detectors 2 1 2 1 Detector Template Thru Left Thru Right Leading Detector (ft) 100 20 100 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 6 20 6 20 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 Turn Type NA Prot NA pt+ov Protected Phases 2 3 14 Free 14 1 2 3 4 7 8 Permitted Phases Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 2040 AM Worst Case Lanes, Volumes, Timings 53: Immokalee Rd 07/16/2021 __10. Jr-- 4--- 1 /P� Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT NEL NER 01 02 03 04 07 08 Detector Phase 2 3 14 14 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 24.0 25.0 11.0 24.0 11.0 24.0 Total Split (s) 29.0 126.0 23.0 32.0 23.0 32.0 Total Split (%) 14% 60% 11 % 15% 11 % 15% Maximum Green (s) 23.0 120.0 17.0 26.0 17.0 26.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None C-Max None None None None Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 Act Effct Green (s) 143.0 55.0 210.0 55.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.68 0.26 1.00 0.26 v/c Ratio 0.72 0.54 0.91 0.69 Control Delay 14.2 69.3 3.4 77.8 Queue Delay 0.2 0.0 45.5 2.2 Total Delay 14.4 69.3 48.9 80.0 LOS B E D F Approach Delay 14.4 50.8 80.0 Approach LOS B D F Intersection Summa Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 210 Actuated Cycle Length: 210 Offset: 196 (93%), Referenced to phase 2:EBWB, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 145 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.37 Intersection Signal Delay: 40.5 Intersection LOS: D Intersection Capacity Utilization 85.9% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 53: Immokalee Rd #99 =44 =47 ;;Z554�44 ;;47 r53 ;:54 =.29 =47 ;;5 I 4r4I7 =53 =5I4 ::29 =44 :;4f 4;;44 � I =47} 7 08 � I Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 2 2040 AM Worst Case Lanes, Volumes, Timings 47: t 07/16/2021 Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR 01 03 04 07 08 Lane Configurations tt ttt r* Traffic Volume (vph) 289 0 0 342 513 462 Future Volume (vph) 289 0 0 342 513 462 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.91 1.00 Frt 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 3433 0 0 3539 5085 1583 Flt Permitted 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 3433 0 0 3539 5085 1583 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 464 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 45 Link Distance (ft) 424 150 254 Travel Time (s) 6.4 2.3 3.8 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 314 0 0 372 558 502 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 314 0 0 372 558 502 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Right Left Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 24 12 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 1 2 1 Detector Template Left Thru Thru Right Leading Detector (ft) 20 5 100 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 5 6 20 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 Turn Type Prot NA NA Free Protected Phases 2 1 7 8 3 4 1 3 4 7 8 Permitted Phases Free Detector Phase 2 1 7 8 3 4 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 2040 AM Worst Case Lanes, Volumes, Timings 47: 07/16/2021 I Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR 01 03 04 07 08 Minimum Split (s) 25.0 24.0 11.0 24.0 11.0 24.0 Total Split (s) 126.0 29.0 23.0 32.0 23.0 32.0 Total Split (%) 60.0% 14% 11 % 15% 11 % 15% Maximum Green (s) 120.0 23.0 17.0 26.0 17.0 26.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.0 Lead/Lag Lag Lead Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode C-Max None None None None None Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 Act Effct Green (s) 120.0 78.0 49.0 210.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.57 0.37 0.23 1.00 v/c Ratio 0.16 0.28 0.47 0.32 Control Delay 48.2 25.6 70.9 0.5 Queue Delay 0.0 5.7 0.6 0.2 Total Delay 48.2 31.3 71.4 0.8 LOS D C E A Approach Delay 48.2 31.3 38.0 Approach LOS D C D Intersection Summa Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 210 Actuated Cycle Length: 210 Offset: 196 (93%), Referenced to phase 2:EBWB, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 145 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.37 Intersection Signal Delay: 38.4 Intersection LOS: D Intersection Capacity Utilization 28.2% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 47 #99 =44 =47 �:N5#44 ;:47 r53 =54 =29 =4I7 =5 4247 �53 tG3 � --1. G3 2 l T T • � 5-1 =4 =294 =44 =47} 7 08 � � 1 � I Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 2 2040 AM Worst Case Lanes, Volumes, Timings 54: t 07/16/2021 Lane Group WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT 01 03 04 07 08 Lane Configurations tiff r* tt Traffic Volume (vph) 449 0 585 272 0 523 Future Volume (vph) 449 0 585 272 0 523 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 1.00 0.86 1.00 1.00 0.95 Frt 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 3433 0 6408 1583 0 3539 Flt Permitted 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 3433 0 6408 1583 0 3539 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 296 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 45 Link Distance (ft) 425 406 127 Travel Time (s) 6.4 6.2 1.9 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 488 0 636 296 0 568 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 488 0 636 296 0 568 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Right Left Right Left Left Median Width(ft) 24 12 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 9 15 Number of Detectors 1 2 1 1 Detector Template Left Thru Right Thru Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 5 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 5 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 Turn Type Prot NA Free NA Protected Phases 2 3 4 1 7 8 1 3 4 7 8 Permitted Phases Free Detector Phase 2 3 4 1 7 8 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 2040 AM Worst Case Lanes, Volumes, Timings 54: 07/16/2021 Lane Group WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT 01 03 04 07 08 Minimum Split (s) 25.0 24.0 11.0 24.0 11.0 24.0 Total Split (s) 126.0 29.0 23.0 32.0 23.0 32.0 Total Split (%) 60.0% 14% 11 % 15% 11 % 15% Maximum Green (s) 120.0 23.0 17.0 26.0 17.0 26.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.0 Lead/Lag Lag Lead Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode C-Max None None None None None Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 Act Effct Green (s) 120.0 49.0 210.0 78.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.57 0.23 1.00 0.37 v/c Ratio 0.25 0.43 0.19 0.43 Control Delay 49.3 69.6 0.3 10.4 Queue Delay 0.0 0.2 0.0 56.6 Total Delay 49.3 69.8 0.3 67.0 LOS D E A E Approach Delay 49.3 47.7 67.0 Approach LOS D D E Intersection Summa Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 210 Actuated Cycle Length: 210 Offset: 196 (93%), Referenced to phase 2:EBWB, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 145 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.37 Intersection Signal Delay: 53.6 Intersection LOS: D Intersection Capacity Utilization 37.3% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 54 #99 =44 =47 �:N5#44 247 r53 =54 =29 =47 =5 14=4I7 #53 tG3 � --1. G32 l T T�` • � 5-1 =4 #294 =44 =47 7 08 � -4,.t :t* I } Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 2 2040 AM Worst Case Lanes, Volumes, Timings 29: 07/16/2021 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations ttt r* tf-t r* tt tt Traffic Volume (vph) 0 2037 255 0 4077 194 437 148 0 245 523 0 Future Volume (vph) 0 2037 255 0 4077 194 437 148 0 245 523 0 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 250 0 250 0 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 0 1 0 1 2 0 2 0 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.95 1.00 0.97 0.95 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 5085 1583 0 5085 1583 3433 3539 0 3433 3539 0 Flt Permitted 0.154 0.563 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 5085 1583 0 5085 1583 557 3539 0 2035 3539 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 222 84 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 535 534 127 150 Travel Time (s) 8.1 8.1 2.9 3.4 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 2214 277 0 4432 211 475 161 0 266 568 0 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 2214 277 0 4432 211 475 161 0 266 568 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 24 24 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 2 1 2 1 1 2 1 2 Detector Template Thru Right Thru Right Left Thru Left Thru Leading Detector (ft) 100 20 100 20 20 100 20 100 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 6 20 6 20 20 6 20 6 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type NA Perm NA Perm pm+pt NA pm+pt NA Protected Phases 12 12 3 8 7 4 Permitted Phases 1 2 12 8 4 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 2040 AM Worst Case Lanes, Volumes, Timings 29: 07/16/2021 Lane Group 01 02 Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) Future Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Storage Length (ft) Storage Lanes Taper Length (ft) Lane Util. Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Right Turn on Red Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) Link Distance (ft) Travel Time (s) Peak Hour Factor Adj. Flow (vph) Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) Enter Blocked Intersection Lane Alignment Median Width(ft) Link Offset(ft) Crosswalk Width(ft) Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor Turning Speed (mph) Number of Detectors Detector Template Leading Detector (ft) Trailing Detector (ft) Detector 1 Position(ft) Detector 1 Size(ft) Detector 1 Type Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) Detector 1 Queue (s) Detector 1 Delay (s) Detector 2 Position(ft) Detector 2 Size(ft) Detector 2 Type Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) Turn Type Protected Phases 1 2 Permitted Phases Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 2 2040 AM Worst Case Lanes, Volumes, Timings 29: 07/16/2021 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Detector Phase 12 12 12 12 3 8 7 4 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 11.0 24.0 11.0 24.0 Total Split (s) 23.0 32.0 23.0 32.0 Total Split (%) 11.0% 15.2% 11.0% 15.2% Maximum Green (s) 17.0 26.0 17.0 26.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.0 6.0 9.0 6.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None None None None Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 Act Effct Green (s) 149.0 149.0 149.0 149.0 43.0 26.0 37.0 26.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.71 0.20 0.12 0.18 0.12 v/c Ratio 0.61 0.23 1.23 0.18 1.37 0.37 0.59 1.30 Control Delay 16.3 4.8 133.2 6.1 213.3 18.1 33.3 186.8 Queue Delay 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.4 9.3 3.6 0.2 Total Delay 16.6 5.2 133.6 6.4 213.8 27.4 36.9 187.0 LOS B A F A F C D F Approach Delay 15.3 127.8 166.6 139.1 Approach LOS B F F F Intersection Summa Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 210 Actuated Cycle Length: 210 Offset: 196 (93%), Referenced to phase 2:EBWB, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 145 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.37 Intersection Signal Delay: 99.2 Intersection LOS: F Intersection Capacity Utilization 120.7% ICU Level of Service H Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 29 #99 =44 =47 ;;Z554�44 ;;47 r53 ;:54 =.29 =47 ;;5 I 4r4I7 =53 =5I4 ::29 =44 :;4f 4;;44 � I =47} 7 08 � I Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 3 2040 AM Worst Case Lanes, Volumes, Timings 29: 07/16/2021 Lane Group 01 02 Detector Phase Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 24.0 25.0 Total Split (s) 29.0 126.0 Total Split (%) 14% 60% Maximum Green (s) 23.0 120.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None C-Max Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/C Ratio v/c Ratio Control Delay Queue Delay Total Delay LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS Intersection Summary Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 4 2040 PM Worst Case Lanes, Volumes, Timings 3: 07/16/2021 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations )) ttt r* )) ttt r* t r*r* ))) t r* Traffic Volume (vph) 559 2742 367 402 1761 815 402 300 767 1182 516 1356 Future Volume (vph) 559 2742 367 402 1761 815 402 300 767 1182 516 1356 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 350 0 500 0 0 300 0 0 Storage Lanes 2 1 1 1 2 2 3 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 1.00 0.88 0.94 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.850 0.850 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 3433 5085 1583 3433 5085 1583 3433 1863 2787 4990 1863 1583 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 3433 5085 1583 3433 5085 1583 3433 1863 2787 4990 1863 1583 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 133 410 248 415 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 45 45 Link Distance (ft) 507 823 498 502 Travel Time (s) 7.7 12.5 7.5 7.6 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 608 2980 399 437 1914 886 437 326 834 1285 561 1474 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 608 2980 399 437 1914 886 437 326 834 1285 561 1474 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 24 24 64 64 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 Detector Template Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 20 100 20 20 100 20 20 100 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 20 6 20 20 6 20 20 6 20 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot Protected Phases 1 6 5 Permitted Phases 6 NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Free 2 7 4 3 8 Free Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 2040 PM Worst Case Lanes, Volumes, Timings 3: 07/16/2021 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Detector Phase 1 6 6 5 2 2 7 4 4 3 8 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 11.0 41.0 41.0 11.0 41.0 41.0 11.0 28.0 28.0 11.0 41.0 Total Split (s) 38.0 107.0 107.0 25.0 94.0 94.0 26.0 33.0 33.0 45.0 52.0 Total Split(%) 18.1% 51.0% 51.0% 11.9% 44.8% 44.8% 12.4% 15.7% 15.7% 21.4% 24.8% Maximum Green (s) 32.0 101.0 101.0 19.0 88.0 88.0 20.0 27.0 27.0 39.0 46.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 6.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None C-Max C-Max None C-Max C-Max None None None None Max Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 28.0 28.0 28.0 28.0 12.0 12.0 19.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Act Effct Green (s) 32.0 101.0 101.0 19.0 88.0 88.0 20.0 27.0 27.0 39.0 46.0 210.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.15 0.48 0.48 0.09 0.42 0.42 0.10 0.13 0.13 0.19 0.22 1.00 v/c Ratio 1.16 1.22 0.48 1.41 0.90 0.98 1.34 1.36 1.45 1.39 1.38 0.93 Control Delay 165.1 147.9 25.6 245.4 84.2 71.3 236.7 249.1 250.9 237.6 238.9 12.0 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 165.1 147.9 25.6 245.4 84.2 71.3 236.7 249.1 250.9 237.6 238.9 12.0 LOS F F C F F E F F F F F B Approach Delay 138.3 102.4 246.7 137.7 Approach LOS F F F F Intersection Summa Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 210 Actuated Cycle Length: 210 Offset: 205 (98%), Referenced to phase 2:WBT and 6:EBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 145 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.45 Intersection Signal Delay: 142.8 Intersection LOS: F Intersection Capacity Utilization 123.1 % ICU Level of Service H Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 3: 01 07 MI. 03 04 s 5 rR3J T 03 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 2 2040 PM Worst Case Lanes, Volumes, Timings 6: 07/16/2021 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations )) ttt r* )) tIM t r* r* Traffic Volume (vph) 315 3738 488 382 2438 275 268 47 288 311 45 365 Future Volume (vph) 315 3738 488 382 2438 275 268 47 288 311 45 365 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 300 440 500 0 0 125 300 300 Storage Lanes 2 1 2 0 2 1 1 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.86 0.86 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.97 0.95 0.95 Frt 0.850 0.985 0.850 0.882 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 3433 5085 1583 3433 6312 0 3433 1863 1583 3433 1561 1504 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 3433 5085 1583 3433 6312 0 3433 1863 1583 3433 1561 1504 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 295 18 128 69 218 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 602 358 551 552 Travel Time (s) 9.1 5.4 12.5 12.5 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 342 4063 530 415 2650 299 291 51 313 338 49 397 Shared Lane Traffic (%) 45% Lane Group Flow (vph) 342 4063 530 415 2949 0 291 51 313 338 228 218 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 36 36 24 24 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 1 1 2 1 2 1 1 2 1 Detector Template Left Thru Right Left Thru Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 20 100 20 100 20 20 100 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 20 6 20 6 20 20 6 20 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Protected Phases 1 6 5 2 7 4 3 8 Permitted Phases 6 4 8 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 2040 PM Worst Case Lanes, Volumes, Timings 6: 07/16/2021 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Detector Phase 1 6 6 5 2 7 4 4 3 8 8 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 11.8 36.8 36.8 11.8 36.8 12.1 26.1 26.1 12.1 26.1 26.1 Total Split (s) 51.0 136.0 136.0 25.0 110.0 22.0 27.0 27.0 22.0 27.0 27.0 Total Split (%) 24.3% 64.8% 64.8% 11.9% 52.4% 10.5% 12.9% 12.9% 10.5% 12.9% 12.9% Maximum Green (s) 44.2 129.2 129.2 18.2 103.2 14.9 19.9 19.9 14.9 19.9 19.9 Yellow Time (s) 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.4 4.4 4.4 4.4 4.4 4.4 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 7.1 7.1 7.1 7.1 7.1 7.1 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None C-Max C-Max None C-Max None None None None None None Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 23.0 23.0 23.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 Act Effct Green (s) 26.3 129.2 129.2 18.2 121.1 14.9 19.9 19.9 14.9 19.9 19.9 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.13 0.62 0.62 0.09 0.58 0.07 0.09 0.09 0.07 0.09 0.09 v/c Ratio 0.80 1.30 0.49 1.40 0.81 1.20 0.29 1.18 1.39 1.09 0.64 Control Delay 104.1 161.3 2.2 246.0 45.2 196.9 93.2 155.3 261.7 142.7 18.2 Queue Delay 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 104.1 161.6 2.2 246.0 45.2 196.9 93.2 155.8 261.7 142.7 18.2 LOS F F A F D F F F F F B Approach Delay 140.5 70.0 169.2 159.4 Approach LOS F E F F Intersection Summa Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 210 Actuated Cycle Length: 210 Offset: 60 (29%), Referenced to phase 2:WBT and 6:EBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 150 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.40 Intersection Signal Delay: 119.6 Intersection LOS: F Intersection Capacity Utilization 123.8% ICU Level of Service H Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 6: 01 07 03 04 M" 4- s35 -406 07 T 03 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 2 2040 PM Worst Case Lanes, Volumes, Timings 11: 07/16/2021 Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT NWL NWR 02 03 04 06 07 Lane Configurations tt 1111 Traffic Volume (vph) 0 0 0 694 2004 0 Future Volume (vph) 0 0 0 694 2004 0 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.91 1.00 Frt Flt Protected 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 0 0 3539 6441 0 Flt Permitted 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 0 0 3539 6441 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 2026 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 45 Link Distance (ft) 254 457 227 Travel Time (s) 3.8 6.9 3.4 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 0 0 754 2178 0 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 0 0 754 2178 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Right Left Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 0 0 48 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 9 15 15 9 Number of Detectors 2 1 Detector Template Thru Left Leading Detector (ft) 100 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 6 20 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 Turn Type NA Prot Protected Phases 8! Free! 2 3 4 6 7 Permitted Phases Detector Phase 8 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 2040 PM Worst Case Lanes, Volumes, Timings 1 1: 07/16/2021 10. -�k ic � Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT NWL NWR 02 03 04 06 07 Minimum Split (s) 11.0 24.0 9.5 11.0 24.0 9.5 Total Split (s) 124.0 90.0 77.0 43.0 32.0 54.0 Total Split (%) 59.0% 43% 37% 20% 15% 26% Maximum Green (s) 118.0 84.0 72.5 37.0 26.0 49.5 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 3.5 4.0 4.0 3.5 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.0 Lead/Lag Lag Lead Lag Lead Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None None None C-Max None None Act Effct Green (s) 118.0 210.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.56 1.00 v/c Ratio 0.38 0.34 Control Delay 26.3 0.1 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 26.3 0.1 LOS C A Approach Delay 26.3 0.1 Approach LOS C A Intersection Summa Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 210 Actuated Cycle Length: 210 Offset: 61 (29%), Referenced to phase 4:WBR, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 140 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.17 Intersection Signal Delay: 6.8 Intersection LOS: A Intersection Capacity Utilization 136.5% ICU Level of Service H Analysis Period (min) 15 ! Phase conflict between lane groups. Splits and Phases =15 z53 ;;59 o*O2 :;;15 z58 57 :;;58 03 04 rR'- - - =14 =14 =56 =11 ;;14 ;;56 06 07 03 1; Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 2 2040 PM Worst Case Lanes, Volumes, Timings 14: 07/16/2021 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR Lane Configurations tiff tiff Traffic Volume (vph) 0 3636 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2004 0 Future Volume (vph) 0 3636 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2004 0 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.86 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.86 1.00 Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) 0 6408 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6408 0 Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) 0 6408 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6408 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) 45 45 45 45 Link Distance (ft) 222 264 227 277 Travel Time (s) 3.4 4.0 3.4 4.2 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 3952 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2178 0 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 3952 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2178 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 0 0 0 0 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 2 2 Detector Template Thru Thru Leading Detector (ft) 100 100 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 6 6 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 Turn Type NA NA Protected Phases 8 6 7 Permitted Phases Detector Phase 8 6 7 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 2040 PM Worst Case Lanes, Volumes, Timings 14: Lane Group 02 03 04 06 07 Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) Future Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Lane Util. Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Right Turn on Red Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) Link Distance (ft) Travel Time (s) Peak Hour Factor Adj. Flow (vph) Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) Enter Blocked Intersection Lane Alignment Median Width(ft) Link Offset(ft) Crosswalk Width(ft) Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor Turning Speed (mph) Number of Detectors Detector Template Leading Detector (ft) Trailing Detector (ft) Detector 1 Position(ft) Detector 1 Size(ft) Detector 1 Type Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) Detector 1 Queue (s) Detector 1 Delay (s) Detector 2 Position(ft) Detector 2 Size(ft) Detector 2 Type Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Detector Phase Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 07/16/2021 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 2 2040 PM Worst Case Lanes, Volumes, Timings 14: 07/16/2021 __1' ►� + . ' Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR Minimum Split (s) 11.0 Total Split (s) 124.0 Total Split (%) 59.0% Maximum Green (s) 118.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.0 Lead/Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 Recall Mode None Act Effct Green (s) 118.0 80.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.56 0.38 v/c Ratio 1.10 0.89 Control Delay 97.0 40.1 Queue Delay 1.0 35.9 Total Delay 98.1 76.0 LOS F E Approach Delay 98.1 76.0 Approach LOS F E Intersection Summa Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 210 Actuated Cycle Length: 210 Offset: 61 (29%), Referenced to phase 4:WBR, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 140 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.17 Intersection Signal Delay: 90.2 Intersection LOS: F Intersection Capacity Utilization 91.7% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 14: =15 Z58 =59 :;;15 z58 ;:57 =58 ► fR'- O 2 0 3 04 �14 =14 =56 __11 =14 =56 06 07 __j' 03 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 3 2040 PM Worst Case Lanes, Volumes, Timings 14: 07/16/2021 Lane Group 02 03 04 06 07 Minimum Split (s) 24.0 9.5 11.0 24.0 9.5 Total Split (s) 90.0 77.0 43.0 32.0 54.0 Total Split (%) 43% 37% 20% 15% 26% Maximum Green (s) 84.0 72.5 37.0 26.0 49.5 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 3.5 4.0 4.0 3.5 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None None C-Max None None Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/C Ratio v/c Ratio Control Delay Queue Delay Total Delay LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS Intersection Summary Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 4 2040 PM Worst Case Lanes, Volumes, Timings 15: 07/16/2021 Lane Group EBL EBT WBT WBR SEL SER 02 03 04 06 07 08 Lane Configurations tiff Traffic Volume (vph) 0 3636 0 0 1589 0 Future Volume (vph) 0 3636 0 0 1589 0 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.86 1.00 1.00 0.97 1.00 Frt Flt Protected 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 6408 0 0 3433 0 Flt Permitted 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 6408 0 0 3433 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 9 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 45 Link Distance (ft) 264 207 425 Travel Time (s) 4.0 3.1 6.4 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 3952 0 0 1727 0 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 3952 0 0 1727 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Left Right Right Right Median Width(ft) 0 0 24 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 0 1 Detector Template Thru Left Leading Detector (ft) 0 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 6 20 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 Turn Type NA Prot Protected Phases Free! 3 2! 2 3 4 6 7 8 Permitted Phases Detector Phase 3 2 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 24.0 9.5 11.0 24.0 9.5 11.0 Total Split (s) 90.0 77.0 43.0 32.0 54.0 124.0 Total Split (%) 43% 37% 20% 15% 26% 59% Maximum Green (s) 84.0 72.5 37.0 26.0 49.5 118.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 3.5 4.0 4.0 3.5 4.0 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 2040 PM Worst Case Lanes, Volumes, Timings 15: 07/16/2021 Lane Group EBL EBT WBT WBR SEL SER 02 03 04 06 07 08 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None None C-Max None None None Act Effct Green (s) 210.0 162.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 1.00 0.77 v/c Ratio 0.62 0.65 Control Delay 6.0 12.1 Queue Delay 2.7 48.5 Total Delay 8.8 60.6 LOS A E Approach Delay 8.8 60.6 Approach LOS A E Intersection Summa Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 210 Actuated Cycle Length: 210 Offset: 61 (29%), Referenced to phase 4:WBR, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 140 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.17 Intersection Signal Delay: 24.5 Intersection LOS: C Intersection Capacity Utilization 105.1 % ICU Level of Service G Analysis Period (min) 15 ! Phase conflict between lane groups. Splits and Phases: 15 =15 z53 ;;59 :;;15 z58 57 :;;58 0 2 ► 0 3 04 rR'- �14 14 56 =11 =14 =56 06 07 __j' 08 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 2 2040 PM Worst Case Lanes, Volumes, Timings 56: 07/16/2021 Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT NWL NWR 02 03 04 06 07 08 Lane Configurations tiff Traffic Volume (vph) 0 0 0 1741 743 0 Future Volume (vph) 0 0 0 1741 743 0 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.86 0.97 1.00 Frt Flt Protected 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 0 0 6408 3433 0 Flt Permitted 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 0 0 6408 3433 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 171 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 45 Link Distance (ft) 205 245 365 Travel Time (s) 3.1 3.7 5.5 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 0 0 1892 808 0 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 0 0 1892 808 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Right Left Left Right Right Median Width(ft) 0 0 24 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 9 15 15 9 Number of Detectors 0 1 Detector Template Thru Left Leading Detector (ft) 0 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 5 20 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 Turn Type NA Prot Protected Phases Free! 7 8! 2 3 4 6 7 8 Permitted Phases Detector Phase 7 8 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 24.0 9.5 11.0 24.0 9.5 11.0 Total Split (s) 90.0 77.0 43.0 32.0 54.0 124.0 Total Split (%) 43% 37% 20% 15% 26% 59% Maximum Green (s) 84.0 72.5 37.0 26.0 49.5 118.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 3.5 4.0 4.0 3.5 4.0 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 2040 PM Worst Case Lanes, Volumes, Timings 56: 07/16/2021 10. —�k ic � Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT NWL NWR 02 03 04 06 07 08 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None None C-Max None None None Act Effct Green (s) 210.0 173.5 Actuated g/C Ratio 1.00 0.83 v/c Ratio 0.30 0.28 Control Delay 0.0 3.4 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 0.0 3.4 LOS A A Approach Delay 3.4 Approach LOS A Intersection Summa Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 210 Actuated Cycle Length: 210 Offset: 61 (29%), Referenced to phase 4:WBR, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 140 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.17 Intersection Signal Delay: 1.0 Intersection LOS: A Intersection Capacity Utilization 53.5% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 ! Phase conflict between lane groups. Splits and Phases: 56 =15 z53 ;;59 :;;15 z58 57 :;;58 0 2 ► 0 3 04 rR'- �14 14 56 =11 =14 =56 06 07 __j' 08 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 2 2040 PM Worst Case Lanes, Volumes, Timings 58: 07/16/2021 Lane Group EBL EBT WBT WBR SEL SER SWL SWR 03 04 06 07 Lane Configurations 1111 rrrr Traffic Volume (vph) 0 0 0 0 3618 0 0 1741 Future Volume (vph) 0 0 0 0 3618 0 0 1741 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.64 Frt 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 0 0 0 6441 0 0 4053 Flt Permitted 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 0 0 0 6441 0 0 4053 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) 45 45 45 45 Link Distance (ft) 245 201 249 200 Travel Time (s) 3.7 3.0 3.8 3.0 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 0 0 0 3933 0 0 1892 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 0 0 0 3933 0 0 1892 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Left Right Left Right Left Right Median Width(ft) 0 0 48 0 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 1 Detector Template Left Right Leading Detector (ft) 20 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 20 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 Turn Type Prot Prot Protected Phases 4 3 2 3 4 6 7 Permitted Phases Detector Phase 4 3 2 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 24.0 9.5 11.0 24.0 9.5 Total Split (s) 90.0 77.0 43.0 32.0 54.0 Total Split (%) 42.9% 37% 20% 15% 26% Maximum Green (s) 84.0 72.5 37.0 26.0 49.5 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 3.5 4.0 4.0 3.5 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 2040 PM Worst Case Lanes, Volumes, Timings 58: Lane Group 08 Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) Future Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Lane Util. Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Right Turn on Red Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) Link Distance (ft) Travel Time (s) Peak Hour Factor Adj. Flow (vph) Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) Enter Blocked Intersection Lane Alignment Median Width(ft) Link Offset(ft) Crosswalk Width(ft) Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor Turning Speed (mph) Number of Detectors Detector Template Leading Detector (ft) Trailing Detector (ft) Detector 1 Position(ft) Detector 1 Size(ft) Detector 1 Type Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) Detector 1 Queue (s) Detector 1 Delay (s) Turn Type Protected Phases Permitted Phases Detector Phase Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 11.0 Total Split (s) 124.0 Total Split (%) 59% Maximum Green (s) 118.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 07/16/2021 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 2 2040 PM Worst Case Lanes, Volumes, Timings 58: 07/16/2021 Lane Group EBL EBT WBT WBR SEL SER SWL SWR 03 04 06 07 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None None C-Max None None Act Effct Green (s) 114.0 84.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.54 0.40 v/c Ratio 1.12 1.17 Control Delay 94.5 124.0 Queue Delay 0.2 0.2 Total Delay 94.7 124.2 LOS F F Approach Delay 94.7 124.2 Approach LOS F F Intersection Summa Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 210 Actuated Cycle Length: 210 Offset: 61 (29%), Referenced to phase 4:WBR, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 140 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.17 Intersection Signal Delay: 104.3 Intersection LOS: F Intersection Capacity Utilization 56.6% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 58 =15 Z58 =59 =15 =58 =57 =58 �14 =14 =56 =11 ;14 ;56 06 07 � 08 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 3 2040 PM Worst Case Lanes, Volumes, Timings 58: 07/16/2021 Lane Group 08 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 Recall Mode None Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/C Ratio v/c Ratio Control Delay Queue Delay Total Delay LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS Intersection Summary Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 4 2040 PM Worst Case Lanes, Volumes, Timings 57: 07/16/2021 Lane Group EBL EBT WBT WBR SEL SER 02 03 06 07 08 Lane Configurations tiff r* Traffic Volume (vph) 0 0 1741 154 0 0 Future Volume (vph) 0 0 1741 154 0 0 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 1.00 0.86 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.850 Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) 0 0 6408 1583 0 0 Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) 0 0 6408 1583 0 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 70 Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 200 209 371 Travel Time (s) 4.5 4.8 8.4 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 0 1892 167 0 0 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 0 1892 167 0 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Left Right Left Right Median Width(ft) 0 0 0 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 2 1 Detector Template Thru Right Leading Detector (ft) 100 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 6 20 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 Turn Type NA custom Protected Phases Free 4 2 3 6 7 8 Permitted Phases Detector Phase 4 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 2040 PM Worst Case Lanes, Volumes, Timings 57: 07/16/2021 Lane Group EBL EBT WBT WBR SEL SER 02 03 06 07 08 Minimum Split (s) 11.0 24.0 9.5 24.0 9.5 11.0 Total Split (s) 43.0 90.0 77.0 32.0 54.0 124.0 Total Split (%) 20.5% 43% 37% 15% 26% 59% Maximum Green (s) 37.0 84.0 72.5 26.0 49.5 118.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 3.5 4.0 3.5 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.0 Lead/Lag Lag Lead Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode C-Max None None None None None Act Effct Green (s) 210.0 37.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 1.00 0.18 v/c Ratio 0.30 0.50 Control Delay 0.1 42.9 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 0.1 42.9 LOS A D Approach Delay 3.6 Approach LOS A Intersection Summa Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 210 Actuated Cycle Length: 210 Offset: 61 (29%), Referenced to phase 4:WBR, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 140 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.17 Intersection Signal Delay: 3.6 Intersection LOS: A Intersection Capacity Utilization 28.6% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 57: =15 Z58 =59 :;;15 z58 ;:57 =58 fR'- 02 03 04 �14 =14 =56 __11 =14 =56 06 07 __j' 03 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 2 2040 PM Worst Case Lanes, Volumes, Timings 59: 07/16/2021 Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT NEL NER 03 04 06 07 08 Lane Configurations tiff r*r* Traffic Volume (vph) 3618 0 0 0 0 632 Future Volume (vph) 3618 0 0 0 0 632 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Util. Factor 0.86 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.88 Frt 0.850 Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) 6408 0 0 0 0 2787 Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) 6408 0 0 0 0 2787 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 8 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 45 Link Distance (ft) 201 205 384 Travel Time (s) 3.0 3.1 5.8 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 3933 0 0 0 0 687 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 3933 0 0 0 0 687 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Right Left Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 0 0 0 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 9 15 15 9 Number of Detectors 2 1 Detector Template Thru Right Leading Detector (ft) 100 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 6 20 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 Turn Type NA Prot Protected Phases Free! 2! 3 4 6 7 8 Permitted Phases Detector Phase 2 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 2040 PM Worst Case Lanes, Volumes, Timings 59: 07/16/2021 10. Jr- 4--- 1 /P� Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT NEL NER 03 04 06 07 08 Minimum Split (s) 24.0 9.5 11.0 24.0 9.5 11.0 Total Split (s) 90.0 77.0 43.0 32.0 54.0 124.0 Total Split (%) 42.9% 37% 20% 15% 26% 59% Maximum Green (s) 84.0 72.5 37.0 26.0 49.5 118.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 3.5 4.0 4.0 3.5 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 1.0 2.0 2.0 1.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None None C-Max None None None Act Effct Green (s) 210.0 84.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 1.00 0.40 v/c Ratio 0.61 0.61 Control Delay 7.7 52.4 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 7.7 52.4 LOS A D Approach Delay 7.7 52.4 Approach LOS A D Intersection Summa Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 210 Actuated Cycle Length: 210 Offset: 61 (29%), Referenced to phase 4:WBR, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 140 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.17 Intersection Signal Delay: 14.4 Intersection LOS: B Intersection Capacity Utilization 82.9% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 15 ! Phase conflict between lane groups. Splits and Phases: 59 =15 z53 ;;59 :;;15 z58 �57 �58 0 2 ► 0 3 'or- 04 rR'- �14 14 56 =11 ;;14 ;;56 06 07 __j' 08 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 2 2040 PM Worst Case Lanes, Volumes, Timings 18: Tarpon Bay Blvd/Northbrooke Dr & Immokalee Rd 07/16/2021 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations )) ttt r )) tIM t r tt rr Traffic Volume (vph) 378 3232 499 139 1684 21 490 197 176 193 91 225 Future Volume (vph) 378 3232 499 139 1684 21 490 197 176 193 91 225 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 0 280 360 0 200 120 120 Storage Lanes 2 1 2 0 2 1 2 2 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.86 0.86 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.97 0.95 0.88 Frt 0.850 0.998 0.850 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 3433 5085 1583 3433 6395 0 3433 1863 1583 3433 3539 2787 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 3433 5085 1583 3433 6395 0 3433 1863 1583 3433 3539 2787 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 199 1 128 245 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 391 815 578 628 Travel Time (s) 5.9 12.3 13.1 14.3 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 411 3513 542 151 1830 23 533 214 191 210 99 245 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 411 3513 542 151 1853 0 533 214 191 210 99 245 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 24 36 24 24 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 1 1 2 1 2 1 1 2 1 Detector Template Left Thru Right Left Thru Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 20 100 20 100 20 20 100 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 20 6 20 6 20 20 6 20 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Split NA Perm Split NA Perm Protected Phases 1 6 5 2 4 4 8 8 Permitted Phases 6 4 8 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 2040 PM Worst Case Lanes, Volumes, Timings 18: Tarpon Bay Blvd/Northbrooke Dr & Immokalee Rd 07/16/2021 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Detector Phase 1 6 6 5 2 4 4 4 8 8 8 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 11.8 41.8 41.8 11.8 41.8 28.3 28.3 28.3 26.3 26.3 26.3 Total Split (s) 63.0 133.0 133.0 16.0 86.0 34.0 34.0 34.0 27.0 27.0 27.0 Total Split (%) 30.0% 63.3% 63.3% 7.6% 41.0% 16.2% 16.2% 16.2% 12.9% 12.9% 12.9% Maximum Green (s) 56.2 126.2 126.2 9.2 79.2 26.7 26.7 26.7 19.7 19.7 19.7 Yellow Time (s) 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 6.8 7.3 7.3 7.3 7.3 7.3 7.3 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None C-Max C-Max None C-Max Max Max Max Max Max Max Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 28.0 28.0 28.0 14.0 14.0 14.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Act Effct Green (s) 30.7 126.2 126.2 9.2 104.7 26.7 26.7 26.7 19.7 19.7 19.7 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.15 0.60 0.60 0.04 0.50 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.09 0.09 0.09 v/c Ratio 0.82 1.15 0.53 1.01 0.58 1.22 0.91 0.61 0.65 0.30 0.51 Control Delay 115.0 91.1 2.8 191.7 15.3 189.1 126.8 37.9 102.1 91.3 12.2 Queue Delay 0.0 0.5 0.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 115.0 91.6 3.4 191.7 15.3 189.1 126.8 38.4 102.1 91.3 12.2 LOS F F A F B F F D F F B Approach Delay 83.0 28.6 144.2 60.4 Approach LOS F C F E Intersection Summa Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 210 Actuated Cycle Length: 210 Offset: 60 (29%), Referenced to phase 2:WBT and 6:EBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 150 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.22 Intersection Signal Delay: 75.0 Intersection LOS: E Intersection Capacity Utilization 108.3% ICU Level of Service G Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 18: Tarpon Bay Blvd/Northbrooke Dr & Immokalee Rd 01 02 04 �38 s3 5 --006 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 2 2040 PM Worst Case Lanes, Volumes, Timings 24: Valewood Dr & Immokalee Rd 07/16/2021 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations ) ttt r ) tIM r Traffic Volume (vph) 336 3511 13 58 1584 7 71 197 49 160 98 286 Future Volume (vph) 336 3511 13 58 1584 7 71 197 49 160 98 286 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 280 185 540 300 0 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.86 0.86 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 Frt 0.850 0.999 0.970 0.924 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 5085 1583 1770 6401 0 1770 1807 0 1770 1635 1504 Flt Permitted 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 1770 5085 1583 1770 6401 0 1770 1807 0 1770 1635 1504 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 101 5 20 202 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 620 977 513 541 Travel Time (s) 9.4 14.8 11.7 12.3 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 365 3816 14 63 1722 8 77 214 53 174 107 311 Shared Lane Traffic (%) 35% Lane Group Flow (vph) 365 3816 14 63 1730 0 77 267 0 174 216 202 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 24 24 12 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 1 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 Detector Template Left Thru Right Left Thru Left Thru Left Thru Right Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 20 100 20 100 20 100 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 20 6 20 6 20 6 20 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Prot NA Prot NA Perm Protected Phases 1 6 5 2 7 4 3 8 Permitted Phases 6 8 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 2040 PM Worst Case Lanes, Volumes, Timings 24: Valewood Dr & Immokalee Rd 07/16/2021 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Detector Phase 1 6 6 5 2 7 4 3 8 8 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 12.1 42.1 42.1 12.1 42.1 12.7 29.7 12.7 29.7 29.7 Total Split (s) 54.0 137.0 137.0 15.0 98.0 24.0 33.0 25.0 34.0 34.0 Total Split(%) 25.7% 65.2% 65.2% 7.1% 46.7% 11.4% 15.7% 11.9% 16.2% 16.2% Maximum Green (s) 46.9 129.9 129.9 7.9 90.9 16.3 25.3 17.3 26.3 26.3 Yellow Time (s) 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.4 4.4 4.4 4.4 4.4 All -Red Time (s) 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 2.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.3 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 7.1 7.1 7.1 7.1 7.1 7.7 7.7 7.7 7.7 7.7 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None C-Max C-Max None C-Max None Max None Max Max Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 28.0 28.0 28.0 12.0 15.0 15.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Act Effct Green (s) 45.4 129.9 129.9 7.9 92.4 13.7 25.3 17.3 28.9 28.9 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.22 0.62 0.62 0.04 0.44 0.07 0.12 0.08 0.14 0.14 v/c Ratio 0.96 1.21 0.01 0.95 0.61 0.67 1.20 1.20 0.89 0.53 Control Delay 97.4 135.1 0.0 174.3 28.1 122.8 195.7 211.9 113.2 14.0 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 97.4 135.1 0.0 174.3 28.1 122.8 195.7 211.9 113.2 14.0 LOS F F A F C F F F F B Approach Delay 131.4 33.3 179.4 108.4 Approach LOS F C F F Intersection Summa Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 210 Actuated Cycle Length: 210 Offset: 0 (0%), Referenced to phase 2:WBT and 6:EBT, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 150 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.21 Intersection Signal Delay: 106.4 Intersection LOS: F Intersection Capacity Utilization 118.9% ICU Level of Service H Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 24: Valewood Dr & Immokalee Rd 01 02,%) 03 04 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 2 2040 PM Worst Case Lanes, Volumes, Timings 44: Immokalee Rd 07/16/2021 Lane Group EBL EBT WBT WBR SWL SWR 01 02 03 04 07 08 Lane Configurations )) tit tiff r Traffic Volume (vph) 247 3731 1882 0 0 169 Future Volume (vph) 247 3731 1882 0 0 169 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 250 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 2 0 0 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 0.91 0.86 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.865 Flt Protected 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 3433 5085 6408 0 0 1611 Flt Permitted 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 3433 5085 6408 0 0 1611 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 9 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 45 Link Distance (ft) 2456 535 184 Travel Time (s) 37.2 8.1 2.8 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 268 4055 2046 0 0 184 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 268 4055 2046 0 0 184 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Left Right Left Right Median Width(ft) 24 24 0 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 2 1 Detector Template Left Thru Thru Right Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 100 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 6 20 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 Turn Type Prot NA NA pt+ov Protected Phases 18 Free 2 7 18 1 2 3 4 7 8 Permitted Phases Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 2040 PM Worst Case Lanes, Volumes, Timings 44: Immokalee Rd 07/16/2021 Lane Group EBL EBT WBT WBR SWL SWR 01 02 03 04 07 08 Detector Phase 18 2 7 18 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 24.0 25.0 11.0 24.0 11.0 24.0 Total Split (s) 48.0 111.0 18.0 33.0 19.0 32.0 Total Split (%) 23% 53% 9% 16% 9% 15% Maximum Green (s) 42.0 105.0 12.0 27.0 13.0 26.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None C-Max None None None None Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 Act Effct Green (s) 74.0 210.0 124.0 74.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.35 1.00 0.59 0.35 v/c Ratio 0.22 0.80 0.54 0.32 Control Delay 45.1 12.4 28.8 49.0 Queue Delay 0.0 29.5 0.2 0.0 Total Delay 45.1 41.9 29.0 49.0 LOS D D C D Approach Delay 42.1 29.0 49.0 Approach LOS D C D Intersection Summa Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 210 Actuated Cycle Length: 210 Offset: 196 (93%), Referenced to phase 2:EBWB, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 145 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.55 Intersection Signal Delay: 38.2 Intersection LOS: D Intersection Capacity Utilization 75.4% ICU Level of Service D Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 44: Immokalee Rd =29 =44 ;:47 ;:53 =5I4 =29 244 =47 =53 =54 044 t 7 01 � � 02 'R r79 r47 7 ZI9;4I7 =53 =54 " T 7 =5I4 08 7z244 4�9}T # =47}7 I Ida I Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 2 2040 PM Worst Case Lanes, Volumes, Timings 53: Immokalee Rd 07/16/2021 Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT NEL NER 01 02 03 04 07 08 Lane Configurations ttt )) ttt r Traffic Volume (vph) 3497 0 639 1684 0 819 Future Volume (vph) 3497 0 639 1684 0 819 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 250 0 0 Storage Lanes 0 2 0 1 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.91 1.00 1.00 Frt 0.865 Flt Protected 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 5085 0 3433 5085 0 1611 Flt Permitted 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 5085 0 3433 5085 0 1611 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) 45 45 45 Link Distance (ft) 534 686 176 Travel Time (s) 8.1 10.4 2.7 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 3801 0 695 1830 0 890 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 3801 0 695 1830 0 890 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Right Left Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 24 24 0 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 9 15 15 9 Number of Detectors 2 1 2 1 Detector Template Thru Left Thru Right Leading Detector (ft) 100 20 100 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 6 20 6 20 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 Turn Type NA Prot NA pt+ov Protected Phases 2 3 14 Free 14 1 2 3 4 7 8 Permitted Phases Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 2040 PM Worst Case Lanes, Volumes, Timings 53: Immokalee Rd 07/16/2021 __10. Jr-- 4--- 1 /P� Lane Group EBT EBR WBL WBT NEL NER 01 02 03 04 07 08 Detector Phase 2 3 14 14 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 24.0 25.0 11.0 24.0 11.0 24.0 Total Split (s) 48.0 111.0 18.0 33.0 19.0 32.0 Total Split (%) 23% 53% 9% 16% 9% 15% Maximum Green (s) 42.0 105.0 12.0 27.0 13.0 26.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None C-Max None None None None Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 Act Effct Green (s) 123.0 75.0 210.0 75.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.59 0.36 1.00 0.36 v/c Ratio 1.28 0.57 0.36 1.55 Control Delay 153.2 56.6 0.2 295.6 Queue Delay 0.1 0.6 0.0 0.1 Total Delay 153.3 57.2 0.2 295.6 LOS F E A F Approach Delay 153.3 15.9 295.6 Approach LOS F B F Intersection Summa Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 210 Actuated Cycle Length: 210 Offset: 196 (93%), Referenced to phase 2:EBWB, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 145 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.55 Intersection Signal Delay: 122.8 Intersection LOS: F Intersection Capacity Utilization 128.3% ICU Level of Service H Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 53: Immokalee Rd =29 =44 ;:47 ;:53 :;;5I4 =29 244 =47 =53 =54 044 t 7 01 lo. --1- 02 'R r79 r47 7 Z- I94I7 =53 =54 " T 7 =5I4 7 08 � 9 ��# � 4�9T # =47 } I Id}a I Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 2 2040 PM Worst Case Lanes, Volumes, Timings 47: t 07/16/2021 Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR 01 03 04 07 08 Lane Configurations tt ttt r* Traffic Volume (vph) 247 0 0 430 569 169 Future Volume (vph) 247 0 0 430 569 169 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.91 1.00 Frt 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 3433 0 0 3539 5085 1583 Flt Permitted 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 3433 0 0 3539 5085 1583 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 154 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 45 Link Distance (ft) 424 150 254 Travel Time (s) 6.4 2.3 3.8 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 268 0 0 467 618 184 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 268 0 0 467 618 184 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Right Left Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 24 0 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 1 2 1 Detector Template Left Thru Thru Right Leading Detector (ft) 20 5 100 20 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 5 6 20 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 Turn Type Prot NA NA Free Protected Phases 2 1 7 8 3 4 1 3 4 7 8 Permitted Phases Free Detector Phase 2 1 7 8 3 4 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 2040 PM Worst Case Lanes, Volumes, Timings 47: 07/16/2021 I Lane Group EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR 01 03 04 07 08 Minimum Split (s) 25.0 24.0 11.0 24.0 11.0 24.0 Total Split (s) 111.0 48.0 18.0 33.0 19.0 32.0 Total Split (%) 52.9% 23% 9% 16% 9% 15% Maximum Green (s) 105.0 42.0 12.0 27.0 13.0 26.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.0 Lead/Lag Lag Lead Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode C-Max None None None None None Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 Act Effct Green (s) 105.0 93.0 45.0 210.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.50 0.44 0.21 1.00 v/c Ratio 0.16 0.30 0.57 0.12 Control Delay 67.3 7.8 76.2 0.1 Queue Delay 0.0 4.9 0.6 0.0 Total Delay 67.3 12.7 76.8 0.1 LOS E B E A Approach Delay 67.3 12.7 59.2 Approach LOS E B E Intersection Summa Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 210 Actuated Cycle Length: 210 Offset: 196 (93%), Referenced to phase 2:EBWB, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 145 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.55 Intersection Signal Delay: 46.5 Intersection LOS: D Intersection Capacity Utilization 28.9% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 47 229 =44 ;:47 ;:53 =5I4 =29 244 =47 t53 z54 �;79 247 Z9;;47 =53 =54 =5I4 =29 =44 9}: # =47} 7 08 � ��'i Imo' I Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 2 2040 PM Worst Case Lanes, Volumes, Timings 54: t 07/16/2021 Lane Group WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT 01 03 04 07 08 Lane Configurations tiff r* tt Traffic Volume (vph) 639 0 628 819 0 803 Future Volume (vph) 639 0 628 819 0 803 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Util. Factor 0.97 1.00 0.86 1.00 1.00 0.95 Frt 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 3433 0 6408 1583 0 3539 Flt Permitted 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) 3433 0 6408 1583 0 3539 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 843 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 45 Link Distance (ft) 425 406 127 Travel Time (s) 6.4 6.2 1.9 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 695 0 683 890 0 873 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 695 0 683 890 0 873 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Right Left Right Left Left Median Width(ft) 24 12 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 9 15 Number of Detectors 1 2 1 1 Detector Template Left Thru Right Thru Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 5 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 20 6 20 5 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 Turn Type Prot NA Free NA Protected Phases 2 3 4 1 7 8 1 3 4 7 8 Permitted Phases Free Detector Phase 2 3 4 1 7 8 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 2040 PM Worst Case Lanes, Volumes, Timings 54: 07/16/2021 Lane Group WBL WBR NBT NBR SBL SBT 01 03 04 07 08 Minimum Split (s) 25.0 24.0 11.0 24.0 11.0 24.0 Total Split (s) 111.0 48.0 18.0 33.0 19.0 32.0 Total Split (%) 52.9% 23% 9% 16% 9% 15% Maximum Green (s) 105.0 42.0 12.0 27.0 13.0 26.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.0 Lead/Lag Lag Lead Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode C-Max None None None None None Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 Act Effct Green (s) 105.0 45.0 210.0 93.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.50 0.21 1.00 0.44 v/c Ratio 0.41 0.50 0.56 0.56 Control Delay 68.2 74.0 1.4 13.9 Queue Delay 22.3 0.4 51.0 51.7 Total Delay 90.5 74.4 52.4 65.5 LOS F E D E Approach Delay 90.5 62.0 65.5 Approach LOS F E E Intersection Summa Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 210 Actuated Cycle Length: 210 Offset: 196 (93%), Referenced to phase 2:EBWB, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 145 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.55 Intersection Signal Delay: 69.3 Intersection LOS: E Intersection Capacity Utilization 50.4% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 54 229 =44 ;:47 ;:53 =5I4 =29 244 =47 t53 z54 �;79 247 Z9;;47 =53 =54 =5I4 =29 =44 9}: # =47} 7 08 � ��'i Imo' I Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 2 2040 PM Worst Case Lanes, Volumes, Timings 29: 07/16/2021 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations ttt r* ttt r* tt tt Traffic Volume (vph) 0 3320 411 0 1594 90 288 340 0 177 392 0 Future Volume (vph) 0 3320 411 0 1594 90 288 340 0 177 392 0 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Storage Length (ft) 0 250 0 250 0 0 0 0 Storage Lanes 0 1 0 1 2 0 2 0 Taper Length (ft) 25 25 25 25 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 0.97 0.95 1.00 0.97 0.95 1.00 Frt 0.850 0.850 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 0 5085 1583 0 5085 1583 3433 3539 0 3433 3539 0 Flt Permitted 0.154 0.167 Satd. Flow (perm) 0 5085 1583 0 5085 1583 557 3539 0 603 3539 0 Right Turn on Red Yes Yes Yes Yes Satd. Flow (RTOR) 235 98 Link Speed (mph) 45 45 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 535 534 127 150 Travel Time (s) 8.1 8.1 2.9 3.4 Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.92 Adj. Flow (vph) 0 3609 447 0 1733 98 313 370 0 192 426 0 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 0 3609 447 0 1733 98 313 370 0 192 426 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 24 24 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 15 9 Number of Detectors 2 1 2 1 1 2 1 2 Detector Template Thru Right Thru Right Left Thru Left Thru Leading Detector (ft) 100 20 100 20 20 100 20 100 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Position(ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Detector 1 Size(ft) 6 20 6 20 20 6 20 6 Detector 1 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Queue (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 1 Delay (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Detector 2 Position(ft) 94 94 94 94 Detector 2 Size(ft) 6 6 6 6 Detector 2 Type CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex CI+Ex Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Turn Type NA Perm NA Perm pm+pt NA pm+pt NA Protected Phases 12 12 3 8 7 4 Permitted Phases 1 2 12 8 4 Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 1 2040 PM Worst Case Lanes, Volumes, Timings 29: 07/16/2021 Lane Group 01 02 Lane Configurations Traffic Volume (vph) Future Volume (vph) Ideal Flow (vphpl) Storage Length (ft) Storage Lanes Taper Length (ft) Lane Util. Factor Frt Flt Protected Satd. Flow (prot) Flt Permitted Satd. Flow (perm) Right Turn on Red Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) Link Distance (ft) Travel Time (s) Peak Hour Factor Adj. Flow (vph) Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) Enter Blocked Intersection Lane Alignment Median Width(ft) Link Offset(ft) Crosswalk Width(ft) Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor Turning Speed (mph) Number of Detectors Detector Template Leading Detector (ft) Trailing Detector (ft) Detector 1 Position(ft) Detector 1 Size(ft) Detector 1 Type Detector 1 Channel Detector 1 Extend (s) Detector 1 Queue (s) Detector 1 Delay (s) Detector 2 Position(ft) Detector 2 Size(ft) Detector 2 Type Detector 2 Channel Detector 2 Extend (s) Turn Type Protected Phases 1 2 Permitted Phases Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 2 2040 PM Worst Case Lanes, Volumes, Timings 29: 07/16/2021 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Detector Phase 12 12 12 12 3 8 7 4 Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 11.0 24.0 11.0 24.0 Total Split (s) 18.0 32.0 19.0 33.0 Total Split (%) 8.6% 15.2% 9.0% 15.7% Maximum Green (s) 12.0 26.0 13.0 27.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s) 6.0 6.0 9.0 6.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None None None None Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 Act Effct Green (s) 153.0 153.0 153.0 153.0 38.0 26.0 34.0 27.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.73 0.18 0.12 0.16 0.13 v/c Ratio 0.97 0.37 0.47 0.08 1.18 0.84 0.83 0.94 Control Delay 37.2 7.9 12.2 1.4 164.2 34.2 97.8 43.8 Queue Delay 43.1 1.6 0.2 0.0 1.7 0.6 40.1 5.2 Total Delay 80.3 9.5 12.4 1.4 165.9 34.8 137.9 49.1 LOS F A B A F C F D Approach Delay 72.5 11.8 94.9 76.7 Approach LOS E B F E Intersection Summa Area Type: Other Cycle Length: 210 Actuated Cycle Length: 210 Offset: 196 (93%), Referenced to phase 2:EBWB, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 145 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v/c Ratio: 1.55 Intersection Signal Delay: 59.5 Intersection LOS: E Intersection Capacity Utilization 98.2% ICU Level of Service F Analysis Period (min) 15 Splits and Phases: 29: =29 =44 ;:47 ;:53 :;�5I4 :;29 t44 =47 :;;53 z54 04-10' t 7 1 02 'R r79 r47 7 Z- I94I7 =53 =54 " T 7 =5I4 7 08 � 9 ��# � 4�9T # =47 } I Id}a I Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 3 2040 PM Worst Case Lanes, Volumes, Timings 29: 07/16/2021 Lane Group 01 02 Detector Phase Switch Phase Minimum Initial (s) 5.0 5.0 Minimum Split (s) 24.0 25.0 Total Split (s) 48.0 111.0 Total Split (%) 23% 53% Maximum Green (s) 42.0 105.0 Yellow Time (s) 4.0 4.0 All -Red Time (s) 2.0 2.0 Lost Time Adjust (s) Total Lost Time (s) Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 Recall Mode None C-Max Walk Time (s) 7.0 7.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 Act Effct Green (s) Actuated g/C Ratio v/c Ratio Control Delay Queue Delay Total Delay LOS Approach Delay Approach LOS Intersection Summary Baseline Synchro 10 Report Page 4 Appendix D Intersection Control Evaluation Forms Florida Department of Transportation Intersection Control Evaluation Form 750-010-30 Intersection Control Evaluation (ICE) Form Stage 1: Screening To fulfill the requirements of Stage 1 (Screening) of FDOT's ICE procedures, complete the following form and append all supporting documentation. Completed forms can be submitted to the District Traffic Operations Engineer (DTOE) and District Design Engineer (DDE) for the project's approval. Project Name Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study FDOT Project # Date 10/30/19 Submitted By Robert Grubel Agency/Companyl Jacobs Engineering, Inc. I Emaill Robert.Grubel@jacobs.com FDOT Context Classification I C4 - Urban General I FDOT Districtl District 1 1 Countyl Collier Project Locality (City/Town/Village) Collier County I Project Typel Corridor Improvement Project The 2018 AUIR projects the intersection of Livingston Road and Immokalee Road to be deficient by 2023 and Project Purpose (What Immokalee Road from I-75 to Logan Boulevard to be deficient by 2026. is the catalyst for this project and why is it being undertaken?) Project Setting Description There is an electrical substation near the northwest corner. A Seed to Table grocery store and Dunkin (Describe the area surrounding the Donuts are in the northeast corner. The southeast and southwest corners are residential. intersection ) Note: Westbound sidewalk is separated from the road by the canal, along the north of the canal. Sidewalk Mu al Context connectivity exists along Livingston and Immokalee Road. Bike lanes exist along Livingston Road. bicycle (Describe the pedestrian, bicyycle, and transit , activity in the area and the potential for activity based on surrounding land uses and development patterns ) Major Street Information Route #: CR 846 1 Route Name(s)l Immokalee Road I Milepost Existing Control Type Signal Existing AADT1 54,900 Design Year AADT 1 85,000 Design Vehicle Interstate Semitrailer (WB-62) I Control Vehiciel Interstate Semitrailer (WB-62) Primary Functional Classification Urban Principal Arterial Design Speed (mph) 45 Secondary Functional Classification (if app.)i Target Speed (mph) [if app.] 45 Direction Eastbound Number of Lanes Study Period #1 Traffic Volumes Study Period #2 Traffic Volumes Sidewalks along One side of the approach Left -Turn 2 �* Crosswalk on Approach? Yes Left -Through 0 Weekday AM Peak Weekday PM Peak o On -Street Bike Facilities? No Through 3 Left 577 Left 559 Q Multi -Use Path? No Left -Through -Right 0 Through 1,527 Through 2,742 Scheduled Bus Service? Yes Through -Right 0 Right 297 Right 367 Bus Stop on Approach? Yes Right -Turn 1 Daily Truck % 4.2% Direction Westbound Number of Lanes Study Period #1 Traffic Volumes Study Period #2 Traffic Volumes Sidewalks along: One side of the approach Left -Turn 2 Crosswalk on Approach? Yes Left -Through 0 Weekday AM Peak Weekday PM Peak o On -Street Bike Facilities? No Through 3 Left 688 Left 402 Q Multi -Use Path? No Left -Through -Right 0 Through 3,187 Through 1,761 Scheduled Bus Service? Yes Through -Right 0 Right 672 Right 815 Bus Stop on Approach? No Right-Turril 1 I Daily Truck %1 5.0% Livingston Rd Page 1 of 4 FDOT ICE: Stage 1 Minor Street Information Route #: 1 Route Name(s)l Livingston Rd Milepost (if app.) Existing Control Typel Signal Existing AADT 31,500 Design Year AADTJ 60,700 Design Vehicle I Interstate Semitrailer (WB-62) Control Vehiclel Interstate Semitrailer (WB-62) Primary Functional Classificationi Urban Major Collector Design Speed (mph)l 45 Secondary Functional Classification (if app.)i Urban Minor Arterial Target Speed (mph) [if app.]l 45 Direction Northbound Number of Lanes Study Period #1 Traffic Volumes Study Period #2 Traffic Volumes Sidewalks along: Both sides of the approach Left -Turn 2 �* Crosswalk on Approach? Yes Left -Through 0 Weekday AM Peak Weekday PM Peak o On -Street Bike Facilities? Yes Through 3 Left 542 Left 402 Multi -Use Path. No Left -Through -Right 0 Through 980 Through 1,499 Scheduled Bus Service? Yes Through-Rightl 0 Right 627 Right 767 Bus Stop on Approach? Yes Right-Tuml 1 Daily Truck % 5.3% Direction Southbound Number of Lanes Study Period #1 Traffic Volumes Study Period #2 Traffic Volumes Sidewalks along: One side of the approach Left -Turn 2 Crosswalk on Approach? Yes Left -Through 0 Weekday AM Peak Weekday PM Peak o On -Street Bike Facilities? Yes Through 3 Left 1,201 Left 1,182 Q Multi -Use Path? No Left -Through -Right 0 Throughl 2,258 Through 2,581 Scheduled Bus Service? Yes Through -Right 0 Rightl 1,472 Right 1,356 Bus Stop on Approach? Yes Right -Turn 1 Daily Truck % 5.1 % Direction Number of Lanes Study Period #1 Traffic Volumes Study Period #2 Traffic Volumes Sidewalks along: Left -Turn Crosswalk on Approach? Left -Through Weekday AM Peak Weekday PM Peak o On -Street Bike Facilities? Through Left Left Q Multi -Use Path? Left -Through -Right Through Through Scheduled Bus Service? I I Through-Rightl I Right Right Bus Stop on Approach? I I Right-Turni I Daily Truck 11 Crash History (Existing Intersections Only) 11 Ippend the most recent five -years of crash data for the intersection from the CAR System. If the crash data evidences any issues relating to safety 1IIerformance, discuss briefly here: Within the last five years (2014-2018), there were approximatley 269 crashes reported, 97 of which were not reported short form. 2 were identified as severe, 1 with bike and 1 with pedestrian. Excluding short form crash reports, the crash severity included 0- Fatal, 2- Major Injury, 8-Minor Injury, 26- Possible Injury, and 61-Property Damage. The 97 crash types are broken down by: 7-Angle, 1-Bike, 10-Hit Fixed Object, 2-Left Turn, 1-Pedestrian, 65-Rea End, 2-Right Turn, 1-Run Off Road, 7-Sideswipe, and 1-Unknown. Livingston Rd Page 2 of 4 FDOT ICE: Stage 1 Control Strategy Evaluation Provide a brief justification as to why each of the following control strategies should be advanced or not. Justification should consider potential environmental impacts. CAP-X Outputs V/C Ratio Justification Weekday AM Weekday PM Multimodal SPICE Strategy to Be Control Strategy Peak Peak Score Ranking Advanced? Currently a signalized intersection. Two -Way Stop- N/A N/A N/A N/A No Controlled Currently a signalized intersection. All -Way Stop N/A N/A N/A N/A No Controlled Signalized 2.01 1.70 2.4 4 Yes Control Traffic volumes too high for efficient roundabout Roundabout 159.60 91.86 2.8 6 No operation. High v/c ratio compared to alternatives. Median U-Turn 2.41 2.27 3.1 1 No High v/c ratio compared to alternatives. RCUT 5.02 4.74 3.1 7 No (Signalized) Currently a signalized intersection. RCUT N/A N/A NIA N/A No (Unsignalized) Jughandle 2 Yes Displaced Left- 1.53 1.34 2.4 3 Yes Turn Currently a 4-Leg intersection. Continuous N/A N/A N/A N/A No Green Tee Not enough available space. Quadrant 2.23 2.32 2.2 No Roadway Single Point N-S 1.11 1.15 2.4 Yes Echelon N-S 1.33 1.42 3.3 Yes Livingston Rd Page 3 of 4 FDOT ICE: Stage 1 Resolution To be filled out by FDOT District Traffic Operations Engineer and District Design Engineer Project Determination Multiple Viable Alternatives Identified: Continue to Stage 2 Comments DTOE Name Signature Date DDE Name Signature Date Livingston Rd Page 4 of 4 Input Worksheet 1 Project Name: Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Stud Project Number: D3191200 Location Collier County, FL Date January 16, 2020 Number of Intersection Legs Major Street Direction East-West VolumeTraffic • Volume (Veh/hr) Percent (%) U-Turn Left Thru Right Heavy Vehicles Volume Growth Eastbound 16 561 1527 297 5.34% 2.58% 59 629 3187 672 5.80% 2.55% 5 1196 2258 1472 5.10% 5.01 % 30 512 980 627 7.35% 2.84% Westbound Southbound Northbound Adjustment Factor 0.80 0.95 0.85 Suggested 0.80 0.95 0.85 Truck to PCE Factor Suggested = 2.00 2.00 FDOT Context Zone C4-General Urban Residential Critical Lane Volume Threshold 2-phase signal Suggested = 1800 1800 3-phase signal Suggested = 1750 1750 4-phase signal Suggested = 1700 1700 Equivalent•Volume Volume (Veh/hr) U-Turn Left Thru Right Eastbound 17 64 6 33 606 1650 321 3458 729 2492 1625 Westbound 682 Southbound 1320 Northbound 565 1082 692 Left -Turn Adjustment Factoi Conversion of left -turning vehicles to equivalent through vehicles Right -turn Adjustment Factoi Conversion of right -turning vehicles to equivalent through vehicles U-turn Adjustment Factoi Conversion of U-turning vehicles to equivalent through vehicles Truck to PCE Factor 1 truck = X Passenger Car Equivalents Critical Lane Volume Sum Limi Saturation Value for Critical Lane Volume Sum at an intersection Capacity Analysis for Planning of Junctions Livingston AM Capacity. • of • Step 2A: Base Conditions Analysis Traffic Signal Number of Lanes for Existing Configuration (Can be edited in "3- Alt Nurn Lanes Input" as needed) Westbound Northbound MRU TYPE OF INTERSECTION Sheet U L T R Traffic Signal FULL 2 3 1 2 3 1 Results for Existing Configuration TYPE OF Zone 1 (North) Zone 2 (south) Zone 3 (East) INTERSECTION Sheet CLV VIC CLV VIC CLV VIC Zone a (west) zones (center) CLV VIC CLV VIC Traffic Signal FULL -- -- -- -- - R Existing Configuration Results Overall v/c Pedestrian Bicycle Ratio Accommodation Poor Accommodation Transit Puur Accommodation Fair Step 2B: Alternative Selection Rankings Inclusion Yes/No Comment Continue to Step 3 Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study Project Name: D3191200 Project Number: Collier County, FL Location: January 16, 2020 Date: Major Street East-West Direction At -Grade Non -Roundabout Intersections? Yes Traffic Signal Yes Two -Way Stop Control No Existing Signal All -Way Stop Control No Existing Signal Continuous Green T No 4 Leg Intersection Quadrant Roadway S-W No Residential Present in Quadrant N-E No Commercial Present in Quadrant S-E No Residential Present in Quadrant N-W No Electrical Substation in Quadrant Partial Displaced Left Turn Yes Displaced Left Turn Yes Signalized Restricted Crossing U-Turn Yes Unsignalized Restricted Crossing U-Turn No Existing Signal Median U-Turn Yes Partial Median U-Turn Yes Roundabouts? No lumes too high for efficient roundabout 50 ICD Miniroundabout 75 ICD Miniroundaobut 1x1 1 NS x 2EW 2NS x 1EW 2x2 Grade Separated Interchanges? Yes Diamond No Not enough available space Partial Cloverleaf A No Not enough available space Partial Cloverleaf B No Not enough available space Displaced Left Turn Interchange Yes Diverging Diamond Interchange Yes Single Point Yes Livingston AM Input Worksheet 2 Input Worksheet 2 Number of Lanes for Non -roundabout Intersections Continue.. Green T ®,IIII©I0I©©III©0 ®II©0I©©,,IIII©IO Quadrant Roadway ®I©IOIIIIII©0I©©I ®I©©oI©©oI©©oI©©n •-- • ®00©000©QIIIQIIIO ®III0III000©000©0 '• ®00©000©QIIIQIIIO ®III0III000©000©0 ®I/O©EPon=aII©OaII©E Input Worksheet 2 Number TYPE OF INTERCHANGE of Lanes for Interchanges ®II©III©II©IQI©IO ®I©IQI©IQII©III©I ®I©©QI©©QI©IQI©IO ®I©IQI©IQI©©QI©©0 Di.placed Left Turn ®I©©QI©©QI©©QI©©0 ®I©©QI©©QI©IQI©IO Immokelee Road Corridor Congestion Study Collier County, FL Volume Echo with Shared Lane Adjustment for Non -roundabout Intersections ®PWAM '®�' MPAvI EM10PAv ®' ®IIM=M ®OMMMIIIMEMMIBM ®0M=M ® PWAMMM PRIME= IBM= IBM= ®OMMMOIME=IBM ®0M=M Conlin.... Green T ®OMIMOOO=IMOMO®OOOO ®I VAMM�I VA10M01VA 0 0I/IIO=0 ® PIVAMIIM REMMERS MIKE® RVAMEMII Quadrant Roadway ®PIAV MEMO PIAVWMIEPIAVM ®PIAVM=M ®12IIIMM1210=[M12 MMISM= ® PVAMKMM RVAIMMIM RVAII®MPVAM=o ®12MIMMIvA®'MIM12MI ®12IIEM0 ®RE MEMO RE10=0 RE ' M®PvAM=M ® RVAMIMM RVA®'MIM RVAMI ®PIVAMEMIM ® IIMEMM MAKE= PIVAMM' M10=0 I/IlIM 0 120 MMEMW ®RVAI/II0 RVAI/IlKEW EEMMMEMM ®®PIAV IMM0PIAV=I= PIAV PAV=®10 P10=0 ®ooIMMooMIMmioM®mioEM0 Capacity Analysis for Planning of Junctions Livingston AM Capacity Analysis for Planning of Junctions Livingston AM Results Worksheet Results for Interchanges TYPE OF Zone 1 (Rt Zone 2 (U Zone 3 (Ctr. Zone 4 (Ctr. Zone 5 (U Zone 6 (Rt INTERCHANGE Ratio E E ®®®®®®®®®®®® NAME ® �M Partial Cloverleaf A i\12111 M M Displaced Left Turn Diverging Diamond \\ „\,,NM,��\\\ \,, , Interchange ® \ �A \\„\\ \\\ �, o a a a Capacity Analysis for Planning of Junctions Livingston AM TYPE OF INTERSECTION Ranking Score Accommodations Accommodations Accommodations Diverging Diamond Interchange N-S �: • 1 3.3 Fair Fair Fair Single Point N-S 2 2.4 Poor Poor Fair Displaced Left Turn o 3 2.4 Poor Poor Fair Displaced Left Turn (Interchange) E 4 2.4 Poor Poor Fair W Partial Displaced Left Turn E-W 5 2.4 Poor Poor Fair Partial Displaced Left Turn N-S 6 2.4 Poor Poor Fair Diverging Diamond Interchange E- 7 3.3 Fair Fair Fair W Single Point E-W Esc 7 2.4 Poor Poor Fair Displaced Left Turn (Interchange) N 9 2.4 Poor Poor Fair S Partial Median U-Turn N-S 10 3.1 Fair Fair Poor Livingston AM Summary Report - Page 1 of 2 Project Name: Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study Project Number: D3191200 Location: Collier County, FL Date: January 16, 2020 Number of Intersection Legs: Major Street Direction East-West Volume— Traffic • Volume (Veh/hr) Percent (%) U-Turn Left Thru Right Heavy Vehicles Volume Growth Eastbound 16 561 1527 297 5.34% 2.58% Westbound 59 629 3187 672 5.80% 2.55% Southbound 5 1196 2258 1472 5.10% 5.01 % Northbound 30 512 980 627 7.35% 2.84% Adjustment Factor 0.80 0.95 0.85 0.80 0.95 0.85 Suggested Truck to PCE Factor Suggested = 2.00 2.00 FDOT Context Zone C4-General Urban Residential Critical Lane Volume Threshold 2-phase signal Suggested = 1800 1800 3-phase signal Suggested = 1750 1750 4-phase signal Suggested = 1700 1700 Summary Report - Page 2 of 2 TYPE OF INTERSECTION Diverging Diamond Interchange N-S Overall v/c Ratio 1.02 V/C Ranking 1 Multimodal Score 3.3 Pedestrian Bicycle Transit Accommodation Accommodation Accommodatio Fair Fair Fair Single Point N-S 1.11 2 2.4 Poor Poor Fair Displaced Left Turn 1.53 3 2.4 Poor Poor Fair Displaced Left Turn (Interchange) E-W 1.70 4 2.4 Poor Poor Fair Partial Displaced Left Turn E-W 1.74 5 2.4 Poor Poor Fair Partial Displaced Left Turn N-S 1.75 6 2.4 Poor Poor Fair Diverging Diamond Interchange E-W 1.81 7 3.3 Fair Fair Fair Single Point E-W 1.81 7 2.4 Poor Poor Fair Displaced Left Turn (Interchange) N-S 1.85 9 2.4 Poor Poor Fair Partial Median U-Turn N-S 2.15 10 3.1 Fair Fair Poor Livingston AM Project Name: Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Stud Project Number: D3191200 Location: Collier County, FL Date: January 16, 2020 Number of Intersection Legs: Major Street Direction: East-West Traffic Volume Demand Volume (Veh/hr) Percent (%) U-Turn 11 Left *1 Thru 1 Right f* Heavy Vehicles Volume Growth Eastbound 16 561 1527 297 5.34% 2.58% Westbound 59 629 3187 672 5.80% 2.55% Southbound 5 1196 2258 1472 5.10% 5.01% Northbound 30 512 980 627 7.35% 2.84% Adjustment Factor0.80 Factor 0.95 0.85 0.80 0.95 T 0.85 Suggested Truck to PCE Factor Suggested = 2.00 2.00 FDOT Context Zone C4-General Urban Residential Critical Lane Volume Threshold 2-phase signal Suggested = 1800 1800 3-phase signal Suggested = 1750 1750 4-phase signal Suggested = 1700 1700 Livingston AM Number of Lanes TYPE OF for Non -roundabout Intersections DOQ�DOQQDOQQDOQQ Two-Way Stop Control Continuous Green T ®IIQ©IIIIII©QIIQIIQIIIIIIII ®IIIII/II II QI/ Q II Q©IIIIII ©Q ®IIIIQQIIQQIIIIIPAVPAV IQIIQ A/Q/QIII/I/III/I/QQI/QQII Quadrant RoadwayPartial ® I/QQa II I/QQa I/QQQ ®IIII Q� II QQQ II QQQ II QQQ �7 I/QQI I/QQI I/QQI IIII QQ Displaced -ft Turn ® I/QQQ I/QQQ I/QQQ I/QQQ Q�7I/Q©Q I/Q©Q I/Q©Q I/Q©Q • 0MI/QQQ I/QQQ I/QQQ I/QQQ ® QQQQQQQQ I/I/I/Q I/I/I/Q ■►'�7IIIIIIQIIIII000QQQQQQ Unsignalized Restricted Crossing U-® Turn QQQQQQQQ I/I/I/Q I/I/I/Q ■ ►'�7IIIIIIQIIIIII000QQQQQQ Median U-Turn ® Q I/QQQ I/QQ II II QQ I/ I/QQ ■ u7IIIIQQIIII000I/QQQI/QQ Partial Median U-Turn ® QI/QQQI/QQ I/QQQ I/QQQ NIM■ I/QQQ I/Mann I/QQQ I/QQ Number of Lanes for Interchanges ®D�QQD�QQD�QQD�QQ I/Q©Q I/Q©Q I/Q©Q I/Q©Q Partial Cloverleaf A I/ I/QI/I/I/QI/I/QI/QI/QI/Q IQ/Q/Q/QNA, I©IIIIII©II Partial Cloverleaf B ®I/Q®I/Q®I/QI/Q I/QI/O I/Q I/Q I/Q I/Q I/QQQ I/QQQ Displaced -ft Turn I/QQQI/Q®II Una I/QQQ (QQQI QQQ/QQQ/QQQ Diverging Diamond Interchange ®II®I/Q®I/QI/QI/QI/Q I/ Q I/Q I/ Q I/Q I/QQQ I/QQQ I/Q® I/Q® I/QQQ I/QQQ I/QQQ I/QQQ I/QQQ I/QQQ Livingston AM Results for Non -roundabout Intersections N C O N C O N C O Zone 1 (North) Zone 2 (South) Zone 3 (East) Zone 4 Zone 5 (West) (Center) m Overall v/c H o m m o m o TYPE OF INTERSECTION Sheet Ratio d E U E L E E oo E E a f0.1 0 0 U a U a U a CLV V/C CLV V/C CLV V/C CLV V/C CLV V/C Traffic Signal FULL Poor Poor Fair N-$ \\\\\\ ' -_ 6 Poor Poor Fair Two -Way Stop Control E-W 6 Poor Poor Fair All -Way Stop Control FULL Fair Poor Fair Poor Fair Fair W Poor Poor Fair N Continuous Green T \\\ E Poor Fair Poor 1267 0.72 " `\ r Poor d Poor Poor Poor Fair Poor $ $_W N-E Poor Poor Quadrant Roadway $_E Poor Poor _ \ \\\\ Poor N_W ,` , �_ i + Poor Poor Poor Poor Poor Fair N$ 1257 0.70 Partial Displaced Left Turn E_W ' �� Poor Poor Poor Poor Fair Fair Displaced Left Turn FULL 1257 0.70 N-S Fair Fair Poor Signalized Restricted Crossing U-Turn Fair Fair Poor E_W N-S Poor Poor Poor Unsignalized Restricted Crossing U-Turn Poor Poor Poor E_W Poor Median U-Turn E-W Falr Falr Poor Fair Falr Poor Partial Median U-Turn Fair Fair Poor t. Livingston AM Detailed Report - Page 4 of 4 Results for Interchanges Zone 1 Zone 2 (Lt Zone 3 Zone 4 Zone 5 (Lt Zone 6 Ratio E Fair 'PAP Partial Cloverleaf A Partial Cloverleaf B 'PAP NN OEM ODisplaced Left Turn \� WENO�001 Livingston AM Input Worksheet 1 Project Name: Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Stud Project Number: D3191200 Location Collier County, FL Date January 16, 2020 Number of Intersection Legs Major Street Direction East-West VolumeTraffic • Volume (Veh/hr) Percent (%) U-Turn Left Thru Right Heavy Vehicles Volume Growth Eastbound 0 559 2742 367 3.07% 2.58% 53 349 1761 815 4.16% 2.55% 0 1182 2581 1356 5.12% 5.01 % 3 399 1499 767 3.33% 2.84% Westbound Southbound Northbound Adjustment Factor 0.80 0.95 0.85 Suggested 0.80 0.95 0.85 Truck to PCE Factor Suggested = 2.00 2.00 FDOT Context Zone C4-General Urban Residential Critical Lane Volume Threshold 2-phase signal Suggested = 1800 1800 3-phase signal Suggested = 1750 1750 4-phase signal Suggested = 1700 1700 Equivalent•Volume Volume (Veh/hr) U-Turn Left Thru Right Eastbound 0 57 0 3 591 2899 388 1881 871 2849 1497 1593 815 Westbound 373 Southbound 1305 Northbound 424 Left -Turn Adjustment Factoi Conversion of left -turning vehicles to equivalent through vehicles Right -turn Adjustment Factoi Conversion of right -turning vehicles to equivalent through vehicles U-turn Adjustment Factoi Conversion of U-turning vehicles to equivalent through vehicles Truck to PCE Factor 1 truck = X Passenger Car Equivalents Critical Lane Volume Sum Limi Saturation Value for Critical Lane Volume Sum at an intersection Capacity Analysis for Planning of Junctions Livingston PM Capacity. • of • Step 2A: Base Conditions Analysis Traffic Signal Number of Lanes for Existing Configuration (Can be edited in "3- Alt Nurn Lanes Input" as needed) Westbound Northbound MRU TYPE OF INTERSECTION Sheet U L T R Traffic Signal FULL 2 3 1 2 3 1 Results for Existing Configuration TYPE OF Zone 1 (North) zone 2 (south) Zone 3 (East) INTERSECTION Sheet CLV VIC CLV VIC CLV VIC Zone 4 (west) zones (center) CLV VIC CLV VIC Traffic Signal FULL Existing Configuration Results Overall v/c Pedestrian Bicycle Ratio Accommodation Poor Accommodation Transit Puur Accommodation Fair Step 2B: Alternative Selection Rankings Inclusion Yes/No Comment Continue to Step 3 Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study Project Name: D3191200 Project Number: Collier County, FL Location: January 16, 2020 Date: Major Street East-West Direction At -Grade Non -Roundabout Intersections? Yes Traffic Signal Yes Two -Way Stop Control No Existing Signal All -Way Stop Control No Existing Signal Continuous Green T No 4 Leg Intersection Quadrant Roadway S-W No Residential Present in Quadrant N-E No Commercial Present in Quadrant S-E No Residential Present in Quadrant N-W No Electrical Substation in Quadrant Partial Displaced Left Turn Yes Displaced Left Turn Yes Signalized Restricted Crossing U-Turn Yes Unsignalized Restricted Crossing U-Turn No Existing Signal Median U-Turn Yes Partial Median U-Turn Yes Roundabouts? No lumes too high for efficient roundabout 50 ICD Miniroundabout 75 ICD Miniroundaobut 1x1 1 NS x 2EW 2NS x 1EW 2x2 Grade Separated Interchanges? Yes Diamond No Not enough available space Partial Cloverleaf A No Not enough available space Partial Cloverleaf B No Not enough available space Displaced Left Turn Interchange Yes Diverging Diamond Interchange Yes Single Point Yes Livingston PM Input Worksheet 2 Input Worksheet 2 Number of Lanes for Non -roundabout Intersections Continue.. Green T ®,IIII©I0I©©III©0 ®II©0I©©,,IIII©IO Quadrant Roadway ®I©IOIIIIII©0I©©I ®I©©oI©©oI©©oI©©n •-- • ®00©000©QIIIQIIIO ®III0III000©000©0 '• ®00©000©QIIIQIIIO ®III0III000©000©0 ®I/O©EPon=aII©OaII©E Input Worksheet 2 Number TYPE OF INTERCHANGE of Lanes for Interchanges ®II©III©II©IQI©IO ®I©IQI©IQII©III©I ®I©©QI©©QI©IQI©IO ®I©IQI©IQI©©QI©©0 Di.placed Left Turn ®I©©QI©©QI©©QI©©0 ®I©©QI©©QI©IQI©IO Immokelee Road Corridor Congestion Study Collier County, FL Volume Echo with Shared Lane Adjustment for Non -roundabout Intersections ®IBM=PAV mmNEW=II®MM ®IIMEMM DIVA MM IIW=II®MM ®IIMMM DIVA MM IIW=II®MM ®IIMEMM DIVA MM IIW=II®MM ®I VA M M�I VAIMMIMI VA 0M�I VA M13® ®I VAMCMMI VAIMM�I VAMM�I VA ®M ®�MI M IV IVAIVAIAV IV IIMM�®IMII Roadway ®Quadrant NONE Kom RVA IMMO RVA MMM IVA MMM ®I VAMEMMI VAIMM01 VAI M01 VA®13M ®� MEMM� I M � MMIM� I/ M ®� MIMM� 10M � MM0�® M ®I MEMMI IMM I MMIMI M 0 ® 12- 112- 112- 0 12- 112- 112-� UMMM0®120 ® NONE 1AV 0 ��M nMMM®®IMM ®©ioEMMoiomoioioMMI PINUM ® NONE= RVARVAMIM O IIMM® IIIMM ®©OEMMoOmoIIMMMIIMEOW ®RVAMEEMRVAIMMO0PAVMM®PAVIMM Capacity Analysis for Planning of Junctions Livingston PM Capacity Analysis for Planning of Junctions Livingston PM Results Worksheet Results for Interchanges TYPE•(Ctr Zone 4 Overall INTERCHANGE Ratio E E 00\\\\mi. � \ MMPartial MMM Cloverleaf A CloverleafPartial Displaced Left Turn IPA x Diverging Diamond I= "\\4) Interchange 141 \\� \100\14 MMOMME111\11 a a a mmu 10 MMMI Capacity Analysis for Planning of Junctions Livingston PM Diverging Diamond Interchange N-S 2 3.3 Fair Fair Fair Displaced Left Turn ` :� 3 2.4 Poor oor Fair uispiacea Len i urn (intercnange) t poyo 3 2.4 Poor Poor Fair W Diverging Diamond Interchange E 5 3.3 Fair Fair Fair W Single Point E-W 5 2.4 Poor Poor Fair Partial Displaced Left Turn N-S 7 2.4 Poor Poor Fair Partial Displaced Left Turn E-W 8 2.4 Poor Poor Fair Displaced Left Turn (Interchange) N �. 9 2.4 Poor Poor Fair S Traffic Signal \ 10 2.4 Poor Poor Fair Livingston PM Summary Report - Page 1 of 2 Project Name: Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study Project Number: D3191200 Location: Collier County, FL Date: January 16, 2020 Number of Intersection Legs: Major Street Direction East-West Volume— Traffic • Volume (Veh/hr) Percent (%) U-Turn Left Thru Right Heavy Vehicles Volume Growth Eastbound 0 559 2742 367 3.07% 2.58% Westbound 53 349 1761 815 4.16% 2.55% Southbound 0 1182 2581 1356 5.12% 5.01 % Northbound 3 399 1499 767 3.33% 2.84% Adjustment Factor 0.80 0.95 0.85 0.80 0.95 0.85 Suggested Truck to PCE Factor Suggested = 2.00 2.00 FDOT Context Zone C4-General Urban Residential Critical Lane Volume Threshold 2-phase signal Suggested = 1800 1800 3-phase signal Suggested = 1750 1750 4-phase signal Suggested = 1700 1700 Summary Report - Page 2 of 2 TYPE OF INTERSECTION Single Point N-S Overall v/c Ratio 1.15 V/C Ranking 1 Multimodal Score 2.4 Pedestrian Bicycle Transit Accommodation Accommodation Accommodatio Poor Poor Fair Diverging Diamond Interchange N-S 1.17 2 3.3 Fair Fair Fair Displaced Left Turn 1.34 3 2.4 Poor Poor Fair Displaced Left Turn (Interchange) E-W 1.34 3 2.4 Poor Poor Fair Diverging Diamond Interchange E-W 1.41 5 3.3 Fair Fair Fair Single Point E-W 1.41 5 2.4 Poor Poor Fair Partial Displaced Left Turn N-S 1.49 7 2.4 Poor Poor Fair Partial Displaced Left Turn E-W 1.51 8 2.4 Poor Poor Fair Displaced Left Turn (Interchange) N-S 1.77 9 2.4 Poor Poor Fair Traffic Signal 1.89 10 2.4 Poor Poor Fair Livingston PM Project Name: Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Stud Project Number: D3191200 Location: Collier County, FL Date: January 16, 2020 Number of Intersection Legs: Major Street Direction: East-West Traffic Volume Demand Volume (Veh/hr) Percent (%) U-Turn 11 Left *1 Thru 1 Right f* Heavy Vehicles Volume Growth Eastbound 0 559 2742 367 3.07% 2.58% Westbound 53 349 1761 815 4.16% 2.55% Southbound 0 1182 2581 1356 5.12% 5.01% Northbound 3 399 1499 767 3.33% 2.84% Adjustment Factor0.80 Factor 0.95 0.85 0.80 0.95 T 0.85 Suggested Truck to PCE Factor Suggested = 2.00 2.00 FDOT Context Zone C4-General Urban Residential Critical Lane Volume Threshold 2-phase signal Suggested = 1800 1800 3-phase signal Suggested = 1750 1750 4-phase signal Suggested = 1700 1700 Livingston PM Number of Lanes TYPE OF for Non -roundabout Intersections DOQ�DOQQDOQQDOQQ Two-Way Stop Control Continuous Green T ®IIQ©IIIIII©QIIQIIQIIIIIIII ®IIIII/II II QI/ Q II Q©IIIIII ©Q ®IIIIQQIIQQIIIIIPAVPAV IQIIQ A/Q/QIII/I/III/I/QQI/QQII Quadrant RoadwayPartial ® I/QQa II I/QQa I/QQQ ®IIII Q� II QQQ II QQQ II QQQ �7 I/QQI I/QQI I/QQI IIII QQ Displaced -ft Turn ® I/QQQ I/QQQ I/QQQ I/QQQ Q�7I/Q©Q I/Q©Q I/Q©Q I/Q©Q • 0MI/QQQ I/QQQ I/QQQ I/QQQ ® QQQQQQQQ I/I/I/Q I/I/I/Q ■►'�7IIIIIIQIIIII000QQQQQQ Unsignalized Restricted Crossing U-® Turn QQQQQQQQ I/I/I/Q I/I/I/Q ■ ►'�7IIIIIIQIIIIII000QQQQQQ Median U-Turn ® Q I/QQQ I/QQ II II QQ I/ I/QQ ■ u7IIIIQQIIII000I/QQQI/QQ Partial Median U-Turn ® QI/QQQI/QQ I/QQQ I/QQQ NIM■ I/QQQ I/Mann I/QQQ I/QQ Number of Lanes for Interchanges ®D�QQD�QQD�QQD�QQ I/Q©Q I/Q©Q I/Q©Q I/Q©Q Partial Cloverleaf A I/ I/QI/I/I/QI/I/QI/QI/QI/Q IQ/Q/Q/QNA, I©IIIIII©II Partial Cloverleaf B ®I/Q®I/Q®I/QI/Q I/QI/O I/Q I/Q I/Q I/Q I/QQQ I/QQQ Displaced -ft Turn I/QQQI/Q®II Una I/QQQ (QQQI QQQ/QQQ/QQQ Diverging Diamond Interchange ®II®I/Q®I/QI/QI/QI/Q I/ Q I/Q I/ Q I/Q I/QQQ I/QQQ I/Q® I/Q® I/QQQ I/QQQ I/QQQ I/QQQ I/QQQ I/QQQ Livingston PM Results for Non -roundabout Intersections TYPE OF INTERSECTION mmmmm�mm� Zone 1 (North) Zone 2 (South) Zone 4 Zone 5 (West) ' (Center) Overall v1c Ratio III �m mm mm mm �m ��,, °off E== Two -Way Stop Control All -Way Stop Control Continuous Green T 11W6 11\�*i Quadrant Roadway ®mm ® \\\*) *( hEs- Partial Displaced Left Turn 111MEMEENNEMINE, Displaced Left Turn FULL Signalized Restricted Crossing U-Turn \ ` MEN�� Unsignalized Restricted Crossing U-Turn Median U-Turn Partial Median U-Turn Livingston PM Capacity Analysis for Planning of Junctions Results for Roundabouts TYPE OF Zone 1 (North) Zone 3 (East) Zone 2 (South) Zone 4 (West) Overall v1c :.Ratio IBM 1.09 Results for Interchanges "Mill! Zone 1 Zone 2 (Lt Zone 3 Zone 4 Zone 5 (Lt Zone 6 Ratio E ®®®®®®®®®®®® Fair Partial Cloverleaf B M P Displaced Left Turn JW S 1 Diverging Diamond \oo\ anuffiffi"'m Livingston PM Florida Department of Transportation Intersection Control Evaluation Form 750-010-30 Intersection Control Evaluation (ICE) Form Stage 1: Screening To fulfill the requirements of Stage 1 (Screening) of FDOT's ICE procedures, complete the following form and append all supporting documentation. Completed forms can be submitted to the District Traffic Operations Engineer (DTOE) and District Design Engineer (DDE) for the project's approval. Project Name Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study FDOT Project # Date 09/15/20 Submitted By Robert Grubel Agency/Companyl Jacobs Engineering, Inc. I Emaill Robert.Grubel@jacobs.com FDOT Context Classification I C4 - Urban General I FDOT Districtl District 1 1 Countyl Collier Project Locality (City/Town/Village) Collier County I Project Typel Corridor Improvement Project The 2018 AUIR projects the intersection of Livingston Road and Immokalee Road to be deficient by 2023 and Project Purpose (What Immokalee Road from I-75 to Logan Boulevard to be deficient by 2026. is the catalyst for this project and why is it being undertaken?) Project Setting Description The northwest corner is residential. The northeast corner contains banks, a fast food restaurant, and a gas (Describe the area surrounding the station. The southwest corner contains a bank and a car wash. The southeast corner contains a Walmart intersection ) grocery store and a Verizon cell phone store. Sidewalk runs eastbound on Immokalee Road and north and southbound on Juliet Blvd/Strand Blvd. There Multimodal Context are no bike lane facilites on any of the approaches. Bus service travels along Immokalee Road however no (Describe the pedestrian, bicycle, and transit stops are located at this intersection. activity in the area and the potential for activity based on surrounding land uses and development patterns ) Major Street Information Route #: CR 846 1 Route Name(s)l Immokalee Road Milepost Existing Control Type Signal Existing AADT 53,800 Design Year AADT 79,700 Design Vehicle Interstate Semitrailer (WB-62) Control Vehicle Interstate Semitrailer (WB-62) Primary Functional Classification Urban Principal Arterial Design Speed (mph) 45 Secondary Functional Classification (if app.)i Target Speed (mph) [if app.] 45 Direction Eastbound Number of Lanes Study Period #1 Traffic Volumes Study Period #2 Traffic Volumes Sidewalks along One side of the approach Left -Turn 2 �* Crosswalk on Approach? No Left -Through 0 Weekday AM Peak Weekday PM Peak o On -Street Bike Facilities? No Through 3 Left 361 Left 315 Q Multi -Use Path. No Left -Through -Right 0 Through 2,311 Through 3,738 Scheduled Bus Service? Yes Through-Rightl 0 Right 254 Right 488 Bus Stop on Approach? No Right-Turril 1 Daily Truck % 3.9% Direction Westbound Number of Lanes Study Period #1 Traffic Volumes Study Period #2 Traffic Volumes Sidewalks along: One side of the approach Left -Turn 2 Crosswalk on Approach? Yes Left -Through 0 Weekday AM Peak Weekday PM Peak o On -Street Bike Facilities? No Through 3 Left 206 Left 382 Q Multi -Use Path? No Left -Through -Right 0 Through 3,889 Through 2,438 Scheduled Bus Service? Yes Through -Right 0 Right 445 Right 275 Bus Stop on Approach? No Right -Turn 1 Daily Truck % 4.0% Juliet Blvd / Strand Blvd Page 1 of 4 FDOT ICE: Stage 1 Minor Street Information Route #: 1 Route Name(s)l Juliet Blvd / Strand Blvd Milepost (if app.) Existing Control Typel Signal I Existing AADT1 900 1 Design Year AADT1 1,600 Design Vehicle I Interstate Semitrailer (WB-62) I Control Vehiclel Interstate Semitrailer (WB-62) Primary Functional Classificationi Urban Major Collector Design Speed (mph)l 30 Secondary Functional Classification (if app.)i Urban Minor Arterial Target Speed (mph) [if app.]l 30 Direction Northbound Number of Lanes Study Period #1 Traffic Volumes Study Period #2 Traffic Volumes Sidewalks along: Both sides of the approach Left -Turn 2 �* Crosswalk on Approach? Yes Left -Through 0 Weekday AM Peak Weekday PM Peak o On -Street Bike Facilities? No Through 1 Left 284 Left 268 Multi -Use Path. No Left -Through -Right 0 Through 51 Through 47 Scheduled Bus Service? No Through-Rightl 0 Right 176 Right 288 Bus Stop on Approach? No Right-Tuml 1 Daily Truck % 3.6% Direction Southbound Number of Lanes Study Period #1 Traffic Volumes Study Period #2 Traffic Volumes Sidewalks along: Both sides of the approach Left -Turn 1 Crosswalk on Approach? Yes Left -Through 0 Weekday AM Peak Weekday PM Peak o On -Street Bike Facilities? No Through 0 Left 159 Left 311 Q Multi -Use Path? No Left -Through -Right 0 Throughl 25 Through 45 Scheduled Bus Service? No Through -Right 1 Rightl 289 Right 365 Bus Stop on Approach? No Right -Turn 0 Daily Truck % 3.6% Direction Number of Lanes Study Period #1 Traffic Volumes Study Period #2 Traffic Volumes Sidewalks along: Left -Turn Crosswalk on Approach? Left -Through Weekday AM Peak Weekday PM Peak o On -Street Bike Facilities? Through Left Left Q Multi -Use Path? Left -Through -Right Through Through Scheduled Bus Service? Through-Rightl I Right Right Bus Stop on Approach? Right-Turni I Daily Truck 11 Crash History (Existing Intersections Only) 11 Append the most recent five -years of crash data for the intersection from the CAR System. If the crash data evidences any issues relating to safety performance, discuss briefly here: Within the last five years (2014-2018), there were approximatley 246 crashes reported, 98 of which were not reported short form. 1 was reported severe by angle crash. Excluding short form crash reports, the crash severity included 0- Fatal, 1- Major Injury, 8-Minor Injury, 24-Possible Injury, and 65-Property ie 98 crash types are broken down by: 11-Angle, 1-Bike, 2-Hit Fixed Object, 2-Left Turn, 0-Pedestrian, 56-Rear End, 2-Right Turn, 0-Run Off Road, 21- ideswipe, 2-U-Turn, and 1-Unknown. ote: Of the 246 total reported crashes, 25 were angle crashes. Juliet Blvd / Strand Blvd Page 2 of 4 FDOT ICE: Stage 1 Control Strategy Evaluation Provide a brief justification as to why each of the following control strategies should be advanced or not. Justification should consider potential environmental impacts. CAP-X Outputs V/C Ratio Justification Weekday AM Weekday PM Multimodal SPICE Strategy to Be Control Strategy Peak Peak Score Ranking Advanced? Currently a signalized intersection Two -Way Stop- N/A N/A N/A N/A No Controlled Currently a signalized intersection All -Way Stop N/A N/A N/A N/A No Controlled Signalized 1.39 1.36 2.4 4 Yes Control Traffic volumes too high for efficient roundabout Roundabout 14.65 16.11 2.8 9 No operation. Median U-Turn 1.16 1.16 3.1 1 Yes Higher V/C ratio than other alternatives RCUT 1.21 1.20 3.1 8 No (Signalized) Currently a signalized intersection RCUT N/A N/A NIA N/A No (Unsignalized) Jughandle 2 Yes Displaced Left- 0.99 0.95 2.4 3 Yes Turn Continuous N/A N/A N/A N/A No Green Tee Not enough available space Quadrant 1.57 1.55 2.2 No Roadway Partial Displaced 1.09 1.07 2.4 Yes Left Turn Improved Signalized 1.30 1.32 2.4 Yes Control Juliet Blvd / Strand Blvd Page 3 of 4 FDOT ICE: Stage 1 Resolution To be filled out by FDOT District Traffic Operations Engineer and District Design Engineer Project Determination Multiple Viable Alternatives Identified: Continue to Stage 2 Comments DTOE Name Signature Date DDE Name Signature Date Juliet Blvd / Strand Blvd Page 4 of 4 Input Worksheet 1 Project Name: Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Stud Project Number: D3191200 Location Collier County, FL Date September 4, 2020 Number of Intersection Legs Major Street Direction East-West VolumeTraffic • Volume (Veh/hr) Percent (%) U-Turn Left Thru Right Heavy Vehicles Volume Growth Eastbound 61 300 2311 254 6.19% 2.55% 8 198 3889 445 6.08% 2.55% 0 159 25 289 6.12% 1.58% 1 283 51 176 5.42% 3.17% Westbound Southbound Northbound Adjustment Factor 0.80 0.95 0.85 Suggested 0.80 0.95 0.85 Truck to PCE Factor Suggested = 2.00 2.00 FDOT Context Zone C4-General Urban Residential Critical Lane Volume Threshold 2-phase signal Suggested = 1800 1800 3-phase signal Suggested = 1750 1750 4-phase signal Suggested = 1700 1700 Equivalent•Volume Volume (Veh/hr) U-Turn Left Thru Right Eastbound 66 9 0 1 327 2517 277 4231 484 27 312 Westbound 215 Southbound 171 Northbound 308 55 191 Left -Turn Adjustment Factoi Conversion of left -turning vehicles to equivalent through vehicles Right -turn Adjustment Factoi Conversion of right -turning vehicles to equivalent through vehicles U-turn Adjustment Factoi Conversion of U-turning vehicles to equivalent through vehicles Truck to PCE Factor 1 truck = X Passenger Car Equivalents Critical Lane Volume Sum Limi Saturation Value for Critical Lane Volume Sum at an intersection Capacity Analysis for Planning of Junctions Juliet/Strand AM Capacity. • of • Step 2A: Base Conditions Analysis Traffic Signal Number of Lanes for Existing Configuration (Can be edited in "3- Alt Nurn Lanes input" as needed) Westbound Northbound MRU TYPE OF INTERSECTION Sheet U L T R Traffic Signal FULL 2 1 1 2 3 1 Results for Existing Configuration TYPE OF Zone 1 (North) zone 2 (south) Zone 3 (East) INTERSECTION Sheet CLV VIC CLV VIC CLV VIC Zone 4 (west) zone 5 (center) CLV VIC CLV VIC Traffic Signal FULL Existing Configuration Results Overall v/c Pedestrian Bicycle Ratio Accommodation Poor Accommodation Transit Puur Accommodation Fair Step 2B: Alternative Selection Rankings Inclusion Yes/No Comment Continue to Step 3 Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study Project Name: D3191200 Project Number: Collier County, FL Location: September 4, 2020 Date: Major Street East-West Direction At -Grade Non -Roundabout Intersections? Yes Traffic Signal Yes Two -Way Stop Control No Existing Signal All -Way Stop Control No Existing Signal Continuous Green T No 4 Leg Intersection Quadrant Roadway S-W No Commercial Present in Quadrant N-E No Commercial Present in Quadrant S-E No Commercial Present in Quadrant N-W No Residential Present in Quadrant Partial Displaced Left Turn Yes Displaced Left Turn Yes Signalized Restricted Crossing U-Turn Yes Unsignalized Restricted Crossing U-Turn No Existing Signal Median U-Turn Yes Partial Median U-Turn Yes Roundabouts? Yes lumes too high for efficient roundabout 50 ICD Miniroundabout No 75 CD Miniroundaobut No 1x1 No 1 NS x 2EW No 2NS x 1EW No 2x2 Yes Grade Separated Interchanges? No Diamond Partial Cloverleaf A Partial Cloverleaf B Displaced Left Turn Interchange Diverging Diamond Interchange Single Point Juliet/Strand AM Input Worksheet 2 Input Worksheet 2 Collier County, FL Number of Lanes for Non -roundabout Intersections Continuous Green T ®0000000�0©©��©0 ®00000000 0000 0©00 Qu.dnmt Roadway ®o©0000000©©oo©©o ®0000000 �00©000©0 '• ®uuuEuOOE000Q000O ®0000000 �00©000©0 ®Qo0�Qo0�o0©000©� ®o nun 000000©000©o Input Worksheet 2 Number TYPE OF INTERCHANGE of Lanes for Interchanges ®�©00000�o©©Qo©©0 ®0000000 ��©00©00 ®�©00000�'©00©00 Di.pl.ced Left Turn Immokelee Road Corridor Congestion Study Collier County, FL Volume Echo with .. Shared Lane Adjustment for Non -roundabout Intersections OOOm00mm00mm000m ®IIMMUIImmnIBM=IBM ®IIMMUIImmOII®®®IIM Conlin.... Green T® ®PIAVm®m PIAV mm0mmmm �WW� mmmm mmmm m®®m mmCM® ®mmmmm®®mmmmmm®m® ® MAMBO MUMMERS mm®® m®CMm ®PIAV m®m PIAV m®m PIAV mmmmmcmm ®oom0o®®®o®®®o®CM= ®oMm o®®®oo®®o®CM0 ®�M® �®®®�®®®�I VACM0 ®�m®m�®m0I VA ®®®�®CM0 ®IIMmOIImmnRUM ®II®CMIM ®IIMMMII®MOIBM=IBM ®12-mm012-mm000®000120 '• ® mmmo nmmOmmm®mmmm ® NONE mm mmmm mmmm omcmm ® o iom= o ioMo ioio®® i ioMM ®IIOmMIIO=0 MEMO nOC= ®Omm=OmMO PIAV mm®m®Mm ®mm®mm®m0' mm®®OmCMm Capacity Analysis for Planning of Junctions Juliet/Strand AM Capacity Analysis for Planning of Junctions Juliet/Strand AM Results Worksheet Overall me 2 Results for Interchanges TYPE OF INTERCHANGE Ratio E E ®®®®®®®®®®®® RIN PIAV PIAV M NINE M 'PAP Partial Cloverleaf A Partial Cloverleaf B Displaced Left Turn ®, �„I3, y..�, Diverging....®:,,M0MOMOM�,-��N==�Interchange Capacity Analysis for Planning of Junctions Juliet/Strand AM TYPE OF INTERSECTION Displaced Left Turn Overall V/C Vatio V/C Ranking Multimodal Score Pedestrian Accommodations PON Bicycle Accommodations Transit Accommodations Fair W01100 Fair Fair Poor Partial Displaced Left Turn E-W 10 Poor r Fair Partial Displaced Left Turn N-S Poor Poor Fair Fair Fair Poor Signalized Restricted Crossing U- Turn E-W onme, 000 Fair Fair Poor Partial Median U-Turn E-W Fair Fair Poor Partial Median U-Turn N-S IME WON Fair Fair Poor Traffic Signal Poor Poor Fair Signalized Restricted Crossing - Turn N-S \'N\ OWNEX, I Fair Fair Poor Juliet/Strand AM Summary Report - Page 1 of 2 Project Name: Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study Project Number: D3191200 Location: Collier County, FL Date: September 4, 2020 Number of Intersection Legs: Major Street Direction East-West Volume— Traffic • Volume (Veh/hr) Percent (%) U-Turn Left Thru Right Heavy Vehicles Volume Growth Eastbound 61 300 2311 254 6.19% 2.55% Westbound 8 198 3889 445 6.08% 2.55% Southbound 0 159 25 289 6.12% 1.58% Northbound 1 283 51 176 5.42% 3.17% Adjustment Factor 0.80 0.95 0.85 0.80 0.95 0.85 Suggested Truck to PCE Factor Suggested = 2.00 2.00 FDOT Context Zone C4-General Urban Residential Critical Lane Volume Threshold 2-phase signal Suggested = 1800 1800 3-phase signal Suggested = 1750 1750 4-phase signal Suggested = 1700 1700 Summary Report - Page 2 of 2 Displaced Left Turn 0.99 1 2.4 Poor Poor Fair Median U-Turn N-S 1.07 2 __q 3.1 Fair Fair Poor Partial Displaced Left Turn E-W 1.09 3 2.4 Poor Poor Fair Partial Displaced Left Turn N-S 1.10 4 2.4 Poor Poor Fair Median U-Turn E-W 1.16 5 3.1 Fair Fair Poo Igna ize es rice Crossing - urn 1.21 6 3.1 Fair Fair Poo Partial Median U-Turn E-W 1.24 7 3.1 Fair Fair Poo Partial Median U-Turn N-S 1.34 8 3.1 Fair Fair P00 Traffic Signal 1.39 9 2.4 Poor Poor Fair bignalizea Kestrictedrossing - 1 urn 5.05 10 3.1 Fair Fair Poor Juliet/Strand AM Project Name: Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Stud Project Number: D3191200 Location: Collier County, FL Date: September 4, 2020 Number of Intersection Legs: Major Street Direction: East-West Traffic Volume Demand Volume (Veh/hr) Percent (%) U-Turn 11 Left *1 Thru 1 Right f* Heavy Vehicles Volume Growth Eastbound 61 300 2311 254 6.19% 2.55% Westbound 8 198 3889 445 6.08% 2.55% Southbound 0 159 25 289 6.12% 1.58% Northbound 1 283 51 176 5.42% 3.17% Adjustment Factor0.80 Factor 0.95 0.85 0.80 0.95 T 0.85 Suggested Truck to PCE Factor Suggested = 2.00 2.00 FDOT Context Zone C4-General Urban Residential Critical Lane Volume Threshold 2-phase signal Suggested = 1800 1800 3-phase signal Suggested = 1750 1750 4-phase signal Suggested = 1700 1700 Juliet/Strand AM Number of Lanes TYPE OF for Non -roundabout Intersections OQQQOQQQOQQ�OQQ� � II ©QQ I/QQQ II ©©QII ©©Q Two-Way Stop Control II ©QQ I/QQQ II ©©QII ©©Q ■�►'•7 II ©QQ I/QQQ II ©©QII ©©Q � II ©QQ I/QQQ II ©©QII ©©Q Continuous Green T ®II©QIIIIIIQ�II©IIQIIIIIIII ®IIIII/IIIIQI/DII©QIIIIII©Q ®IIIIQQIIQQIIIIIPAVPAV IQIIQ AI/QI/Q III/I/II I I QQ I/QQII Quadrant RoadwayPartial ® I/QQa II I/QQa I/QQQ ®IIII Q� II QQQ II QQQ II Q00 �7I/Q0� I/QQQ I/Q0� III/00 Displaced -ft Turn ®I/QQQI/QQaII©QQII©QQ Q�7 II ©QQ I/QQQ II ©©QII ©©Q • QM I/QQQ I/QQQ I/QQQ I/QQQ ® QQQQQQaa I/I/I/Q I/I/I/Q ■�'u7IIIIIIQIIIIII000QQQQQQ Unsignalized Restricted Crossing U-® Turn QQQQQQaa I/I/I/Q I/I/I/Q ■�'u7IIIIIIQIIIIII000QQQQQQ Median U-Turn ® Q I/QQQ I/Qa I/I/QQ I/ I/QQ ■u7 IIII a IIII QQQ I/ QQ© I/ QQ Partial Median U-Turn ® QII QQQI/Qo I/QQQ I/QQQ Qom■ I/QQQ I/QQQQ II ©QQ I/QQ Number of Lanes for Interchanges TYPE OF INTERCHANGE II ©QQ I/QQQ II ©©QII ©©Q Partial Cloverleaf A II©I/QIIQI/QI/II©I/I/I/DII Partial Cloverleaf B ®I/Q®I/QanI/QI/QI/QI/Q I© IQ/QIOI Una IUna Displaced -ft Turn I/QQQI/Q=�II Una I/Q©Q I©QQ/ QQQI©©QI©©Q Diverging Diamond Interchange ®II®II�I/QI/QI/QI/Q II©IQI/Q/QII©©QII©©Q I/Q®I/Q�II©©QII©©Q II ©QQ I/QQQ II ©©QII ©©Q Juliet/Strand AM Results for Non -roundabout Intersections Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 4 Zone 5 ' Overall TYPE OF INTERSECTION mmmmm�mm�_ (North) (South) (West) (Center) v1c III Ratio �m ® mm m m _ m� \ \ \ \ mmmmmmmm m == Two-Way Stop Control All -Way Stop Control Continuous Green T MIAM mp g 111MENEEffix, WEENSHE 111= �mmm = Quadrant Roadway INNEENNIN MEMEM mm MPIR Partial Displaced Left Turn WEEN A ��N\ Displaced Left Turn Signalized Restricted Crossing U-Turn ` ` ® EMNEMedian Unsignalized Restricted Crossing U-Turn U-Turn Juliet/Strand AM Detailed Report - Page 4 of 4 Results for Interchanges Zone 1 Zone 2 (Lt Zone 3 Zone 4 Zone 5 (Lt Zone 6 Ratio E ®®®®®®®®®®®® 111111, Partial Cloverleaf A Partial Cloverleaf B Displaced Left Turn WEENN 748 0.42 Diverging Diamond® Interchange 1121 50 Juliet/Strand AM Input Worksheet 1 Project Name: Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Stud Project Number: D3191200 Location Collier County, FL Date September 4, 2020 Number of Intersection Legs Major Street Direction East-West VolumeTraffic • Volume (Veh/hr) Percent (%) U-Turn Left Thru Right Heavy Vehicles Volume Growth Eastbound 30 285 3738 488 1.54% 2.55% 21 361 2438 275 1.94% 2.55% 0 311 45 365 1.04% 1.58% 0 268 47 288 1.85% 3.17% Westbound Southbound Northbound Adjustment Factor 0.80 0.95 0.85 Suggested 0.80 0.95 0.85 Truck to PCE Factor Suggested = 2.00 2.00 FDOT Context Zone C4-General Urban Residential Critical Lane Volume Threshold 2-phase signal Suggested = 1800 1800 3-phase signal Suggested = 1750 1750 4-phase signal Suggested = 1700 1700 Equivalent•Volume Volume (Veh/hr) U-Turn Left Thru Right Eastbound 31 22 0 0 297 3892 508 2549 287 46 375 Westbound 377 Southbound 319 Northbound 282 49 303 Left -Turn Adjustment Factoi Conversion of left -turning vehicles to equivalent through vehicles Right -turn Adjustment Factoi Conversion of right -turning vehicles to equivalent through vehicles U-turn Adjustment Factoi Conversion of U-turning vehicles to equivalent through vehicles Truck to PCE Factor 1 truck = X Passenger Car Equivalents Critical Lane Volume Sum Limi Saturation Value for Critical Lane Volume Sum at an intersection Capacity Analysis for Planning of Junctions Juliet/Strand PM Capacity. • of • Step 2A: Base Conditions Analysis Traffic Signal Number of Lanes for Existing Configuration (Can be edited in "3- Alt Nurn Lanes input" as needed) Westbound Northbound MRU TYPE OF INTERSECTION Sheet U L T R Traffic Signal FULL 2 1 1 2 3 1 Results for Existing Configuration TYPE OF Zone 1 (North) Zone 2 (south) Zone 3 (East) INTERSECTION Sheet CLV VIC CLV VIC CLV VIC Zone a (west) zones (center) CLV VIC CLV VIC Traffic Signal FULL -- -- -- -- i : Existing Configuration Results Overall v/c Pedestrian Bicycle Ratio Accommodation Poor Accommodation Transit Puur Accommodation Fair Step 2B: Alternative Selection Rankings Inclusion Yes/No Comment Continue to Step 3 Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study Project Name: D3191200 Project Number: Collier County, FL Location: September 4, 2020 Date: Major Street East-West Direction At -Grade Non -Roundabout Intersections? Yes Traffic Signal Yes Two -Way Stop Control No Existing Signal All -Way Stop Control No Existing Signal Continuous Green T No 4 Leg Intersection Quadrant Roadway S-W No Commercial Present in Quadrant N-E No Commercial Present in Quadrant S-E No Commercial Present in Quadrant N-W No Residential Present in Quadrant Partial Displaced Left Turn Yes Displaced Left Turn Yes Signalized Restricted Crossing U-Turn Yes Unsignalized Restricted Crossing U-Turn No Existing Signal Median U-Turn Yes Partial Median U-Turn Yes Roundabouts? No lumes too high for efficient roundabout 50 ICD Miniroundabout 75 CD Miniroundaobut 1x1 1 NS x 2EW 2NS x 1EW 2x2 Grade Separated Interchanges? No Diamond Not enough available space Partial Cloverleaf A Not enough available space Partial Cloverleaf B Not enough available space Displaced Left Turn Interchange Diverging Diamond Interchange Single Point Juliet/Strand PM Input Worksheet 2 Input Worksheet 2 Collier County, FL Number of Lanes for Non -roundabout Intersections Continuous Green T ®II©ESSI/IIOEII©IIOI/IIIIII ® FAMOII IIOIUM SUMPS FAM©0 ®00000000 OOOO O©OO OO©0O©©O Qu.dnmt Roadway ®O©OOOOOO ®O©ooO000O©©oO©©n ®OO00000 �00©000©0 ®OO00000 �00©000©0 ®QOO�QOO�OO©0OO©� ®O nun O000aO©oaO©o Input Worksheet 2 Number TYPE OF INTERCHANGE of Lanes for Interchanges ®OOOOOOO ��©OO©OO ®�©00000�'©OO©OO Di.pl.ced Left Turn Immokelee Road Corridor Congestion Study Collier County, FL Volume Echo with Shared Lane Adjustment for Non -roundabout Intersections ®10MU My M= My MEM ' IS®EMM ® OMmM II M=O II MEMO II ®EMM ® II MUM II M=O II ME= II M= ® II MUM II M=O II MEME3 II M= Conlin.... Green T® PIVAMMPIVA PIVAMMn PIVAOMPIVA PIVAMEM® ®PIVAM mOPIVAMm�PIVAMM�PIVA ®M ® M M120I/I/II RS RU PEE= � ®MIS ® ioM W O loom® ioMEMEM io®MM ® IVAI/m0Il Mm® II MEM0II ®MM ®RVAMM PIVAMmMRUPEE= RVA®EMM ®RVAIMMM PIVAMm®PIVAMEME PIVARAV EMM ®PIAV MWOPRAMMQ PRAMEMOPEA ®EMM ®MMMO PIUMM PIVAMEM PIVA®EMO ®MAININ0MAININU®MEMO®®EMM ®MEMO®®EMM ®RVARAV amRVARAVM ®PIREMO®MEMM ®oOmmoOMOII MEMO IIMEMO ®RVAMWO PIVAMMM ®MV EEO ®PAvEMM Capacity Analysis for Planning of Junctions Juliet/Strand PM Capacity Analysis for Planning of Junctions Juliet/Strand PM Results Worksheet Overall me 2 \\\ \ ;ppp- Results for Interchanges TYPE•(Ctr Zone 4 Overall IN INTERCHANGE Ratio E E ®.... \ ... �� .... C ® NINE. ..� CloverleafPartial C.. ® r ...�� .,t,�`� NINE. M1MV . CloverleafPartial - ®C...4 ... �,� �Mo�` �� , Left Turn I AV Diverging \\\ InterchangeDisplaced ®, MEMMUMME an .,PEA.. Capacity Analysis for Planning of Junctions Juliet/Strand PM TYPE OF INTERSECTION Displaced Left Turn Overall V/C Ratio N \1301 V/C Ranking Multimodal Score Pedestrian Accommodations momh Bicycle Accommodations Transit Accommodations Partial Displaced Left Turn E-W 100 001 Poor Poor Fair Partial Displaced Left Turn N-S 10 Poor Poor Fair Median U-Turn N-S Fair Fair Poor Fair Fair Poor Signalized Restricted Crossing U- Turn E-W mme Fair Fair Poor Partial Median U-Turn E-W W Fair Fair Poor Traffic Signal NONNI Poor Poor Fair Partial Median U-Turn N-S Fair Fair Poor Signalized Restricted Crossing U- Turn N-S Juliet/Strand PM Summary Report - Page 1 of 2 Project Name: Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study Project Number: D3191200 Location: Collier County, FL Date: September 4, 2020 Number of Intersection Legs: Major Street Direction East-West Volume— Traffic • Volume (Veh/hr) Percent (%) U-Turn Left Thru Right Heavy Vehicles Volume Growth Eastbound 30 458 3738 488 1.54% 4.57% Westbound 21 361 2438 275 1.94% 4.57% Southbound 0 436 63 512 1.04% 3.32% Northbound 0 272 48 293 1.85% 3.32% Adjustment Factor 0.80 0.95 0.85 0.80 0.95 0.85 Suggested Truck to PCE Factor Suggested = 2.00 2.00 FDOT Context Zone C4-General Urban Residential Critical Lane Volume Threshold 2-phase signal Suggested = 1800 1800 3-phase signal Suggested = 1750 1750 4-phase signal Suggested = 1700 1700 Summary Report - Page 2 of 2 TYPE OF INTERSECTION Displaced Left Turn Overall v/c Ratio 0.95 V/C Ranking 1 Multimodal Score 2.4 Pedestrian Bicycle Transit Accommodation Accommodation Accommodatio Poor Poor Fair Partial Displaced Left Turn E-W 1.07 2 2.4 Poor Poor Falr Partial Displaced Left Turn N-S 1.10 3 2.4 Poor Poor Fair Median U-Turn N-S 1.14 4 3.1 Fair Fair Po Median U-Turn E-W 1.16 5 3.1 Fair Fair Poo bignalizeCl Kestrictedrossing - I urn 1.20 6 3.1 Fair Fair Poo Partial Median U-Turn E-W 1.22 7 3.1 Fair Fair Poo Traffic Signal 1.36 8 2.4 Poor Poor Fair Partial Median U-Turn N-S 1.41 9 3.1 Fair Fair Poor bignalizeCl Kestrictedrossing - 1 urn 5.00 10 3.1 Fair Fair Poor Juliet/Strand PM Project Name: Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Stud Project Number: D3191200 Location: Collier County, FL Date: September 4, 2020 Number of Intersection Legs: Major Street Direction: East-West Traffic Volume Demand Volume (Veh/hr) Percent (%) U-Turn 11 Left *1 Thru 1 Right f* Heavy Vehicles Volume Growth Eastbound 30 285 3738 488 1.54% 2.55% Westbound 21 361 2438 275 1.94% 2.55% Southbound 0 311 45 365 1.04% 1.58% Northbound 0 268 47 288 1.85% 3.17% Adjustment Factor0.80 Factor 0.95 0.85 0.80 0.95 T 0.85 Suggested Truck to PCE Factor Suggested = 2.00 2.00 FDOT Context Zone C4-General Urban Residential Critical Lane Volume Threshold 2-phase signal Suggested = 1800 1800 3-phase signal Suggested = 1750 1750 4-phase signal Suggested = 1700 1700 Juliet/Strand PM Number of Lanes TYPE OF for Non -roundabout Intersections OQQQOQQQOQQ�OQQ� � II ©QQ I/QQQ II ©©QII ©©Q Two-Way Stop Control II ©QQ I/QQQ II ©©QII ©©Q ■�►'•7 II ©QQ I/QQQ II ©©QII ©©Q � II ©QQ I/QQQ II ©©QII ©©Q Continuous Green T ®II©QIIIIIIQ�II©IIQIIIIIIII ®IIIII/IIIIQI/DII©QIIIIII©Q ®IIIIQQIIQQIIIIIPAVPAV IQIIQ AI/QI/Q III/I/II I I QQ I/QQII Quadrant RoadwayPartial ® I/QQa II I/QQa I/QQQ ®IIII Q� II QQQ II QQQ II Q00 �7I/Q0� I/QQQ I/Q0� III/00 Displaced -ft Turn ®II©QQI/QQ�II©©QII©©Q Q�7 II ©QQ I/QQQ II ©©QII ©©Q • Q� I/QQQ I/QQQ I/QQQ I/QQQ ® QQQQQQQa I/I/I/Q I/I/I/Q ■u7IIIIIIQIIIIII000QQQQQQ Unsignalized Restricted Crossing U-® Turn QQQQQQQa I/I/I/Q I/I/I/Q IIIQIIIQQQQQQQQQ Median U-Turn ® Q I/QQQ I/Qa I/I/QQ I/ I/QQ ■u7 IIII QQ IIII QQQ I/ QQ© I/ QQ Partial Median U-Turn ® QII QQQI I/QQQ I/QQQ Qom■ I/QQQ I/QQQQ II ©QQ II ©Q Number of Lanes for Interchanges TYPE OF INTERCHANGE II ©QQ I/QQQ II ©©QII ©©Q Partial Cloverleaf A II©I/QIIQI/QI/II©I/I/I/DII Partial Cloverleaf B ®I/Q®I/Q� I/QI/Q I/QI/Q II© I Q I/Q I/M II©©QII ©©Q Displaced -ft Turn I/QQQI/Q�II®QPIVA Q II ©QQ II QQQ II ©©QII ©©Q Diverging Diamond Interchange ®II®II�I/QI/QI/QI/Q II©IQ/Q/QI©©QII©©Q I/Q®I/Q�I/Q©QII©©Q II ©QQ I/QQQ II ©©QII ©©Q Juliet/Strand PM Results for Non -roundabout Intersections Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 4 Zone 5 ' Overall TYPE OF INTERSECTION mmmmm�mm� (North) (South) (West) (Center) v1c III Ratio �m mmmmmmmm E== Two -Way Stop Control All -Way Stop Control Continuous Green T INEWEENNOWEENE MEN Quadrant. MINN mm MPIR ��mmm Partial Displaced Left Turn 1110% ®....Displaced \ E Left Turn Signalized Restricted Crossing U-Turn \ � OAUnsignalized Restricted Crossing U-Turn Median U-Turn Partial Median U.-Turn I MPS Juliet/Strand PM Detailed Report - Page 4 of 4 Results for Interchanges Zone 1 Zone 2 (Lt Zone 3 Zone 4 Zone 5 (Lt Zone 6 Ratio E ®®®®®®®®®®®® Fair Partial Cloverleaf A Partial Cloverleaf B MPPV Displaced Left Turn KIM , ., R D ® Interchange �M� �E Juliet/Strand PM Florida Department of Transportation Intersection Control Evaluation Form 750-010-30 Intersection Control Evaluation (ICE) Form Stage 1: Screening To fulfill the requirements of Stage 1 (Screening) of FDOT's ICE procedures, complete the following form and append all supporting documentation. Completed forms can be submitted to the District Traffic Operations Engineer (DTOE) and District Design Engineer (DDE) for the project's approval. Project Name Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study FDOT Project # Date 01/16/20 Submitted By Robert Grubel Agency/Companyl Jacobs Engineering, Inc. I Emaill Robert.Grubel@jacobs.com FDOT Context Classification I C4 - Urban General I FDOT Districtl District 1 1 Countyl Collier Project Locality (City/Town/Village) Collier County I Project Typel Corridor Improvement Project The 2018 AUIR projects the intersection of Livingston Road and Immokalee Road to be deficient by 2023 and Project Purpose (What Immokalee Road from I-75 to Logan Boulevard to be deficient by 2026. is the catalyst for this project and why is it being undertaken?) Project Setting Description Given this is the I-75 interchange, there are no parcels that can be accessed directly from the intersection. (Describe the area surrounding the The northeast side of the intersection contains commercial development including restaurants. The intersection ) southeast side of the intersection also contains commercial development including restaurants. The northwest i f the intersection contains a bank,insurance aaen noffice suite. The southwest side of Sidewalk exists on the eastbound and westbound direction of Immokalee Road. No sidewalk exists along Multimodal Context westbound and eastbound or on the ramps. There are no bike lane facilites on any of the approaches. Bus (Describe the pedestrian, bicycle, and transit service travels along Immokalee Road however no stops are located at this intersection. activity in the area and the potential for activity based on surrounding land uses and development patterns ) Major Street Information Route #: 1-75 Route Name(s) 1-75 NB/SB Ramps I Milepost Existing Control Type Other Existing AADT 70,500 Design Year AADT 1 106,500 Design Vehicle Interstate Semitrailer (WB-62) I Control Vehiciel Interstate Semitrailer (WB-62) Primary Functional Classification Urban Principal Arterial Design Speed (mph) 70 Secondary Functional Classification (if app.)i Target Speed (mph) [if app.] 70 Direction Northbound Number of Lanes Study Period #1 Traffic Volumes Study Period #2 Traffic Volumes Sidewalks along Neither side of the approach Left -Turn 2 �* Crosswalk on Approach? Yes Left -Through 0 Weekday AM Peak Weekday PM Peak o On -Street Bike Facilities? No Through 3 Left 1,111 Left 743 Q Multi -Use Path? No Left -Through -Right 0 Through 5,958 Through 6,303 Scheduled Bus Service? No Through -Right 0 Right 608 Right 632 Bus Stop on Approach? No Right-Turril 2 Daily Truck % 4.3% Direction Southbound Number of Lanes Study Period #1 Traffic Volumes Study Period #2 Traffic Volumes Sidewalks along: Neither side of the approach Left-Turnl 2 Crosswalk on Approach? No Left -Through 0 Weekday AM Peak Weekday PM Peak o On -Street Bike Facilities? No Through 3 Left 1,418 Left 1,589 Q Multi -Use Path? No Left -Through -Right 0 Through 7,213 Through 7,794 Scheduled Bus Service? No Through -Right 0 Right 1,374 Right 694 Bus Stop on Approach? No Right-Turril 2 Daily Truck %1 8.7% 1-75 Interchange Page 1 of 4 FDOT ICE: Stage 1 Minor Street Information Route #: CR 846 1 Route Name(s)l Immokalee Road Milepost (if app.) Existing Control Typel Other I Existing AADTJ 70,500 1 Design Year AADTJ 106,500 Design Vehicle I Interstate Semitrailer (WB-62) I Control Vehiclel Interstate Semitrailer (WB-62) Primary Functional Classification Urban Major Collector Design Speed (mph) 45 Secondary Functional Classification (if app.)i Target Speed (mph) [if app.]l 45 Direction Eastbound Number of Lanes Study Period #1 Traffic Volumes Study Period #2 Traffic Volumes Sidewalks along: One side of the approach Left -Turn 2 �* Crosswalk on Approach? No Left -Through 0 Weekday AM Peak Weekday PM Peak o On -Street Bike Facilities? No Through 4 Left 690 Left 909 Multi -Use Path. No Left -Through -Right 0 Through 2,452 Through 3,618 Scheduled Bus Service? Yes Through-Rightl 0 Right 517 Right 662 Bus Stop on Approach? Yes Right-Tuml 1 Daily Truck % 6.1 % Direction Westbound Number of Lanes Study Period #1 Traffic Volumes Study Period #2 Traffic Volumes Sidewalks along: One side of the approach Left -Turn 2 Crosswalk on Approach? No Left -Through 0 Weekday AM Peak Weekday PM Peak o On -Street Bike Facilities? No Through 4 Left 711 Left 233 Q Multi -Use Path? No Left -Through -Right 0 Throughl 3,046 Through 2,004 Scheduled Bus Service? Yes Through -Right 0 Rightl 1,482 Right 512 Bus Stop on Approach? Yes Right -Turn 1 Daily Truck % 4.5% Direction Number of Lanes Study Period #1 Traffic Volumes Study Period #2 Traffic Volumes Sidewalks along: Left -Turn Crosswalk on Approach? Left -Through Weekday AM Peak Weekday PM Peak o On -Street Bike Facilities? Through Left Left Q Multi -Use Path? Left -Through -Right Through Through Scheduled Bus Service? Through-Rightl I Right Right Bus Stop on Approach? Right-Turni I Daily Truck Crash History (Existing Intersections Only) Append the most recent five -years of crash data for the intersection from the CAR System. If the crash data evidences any issues relating to safety performance, discuss briefly here: Within the last five years (2014-2018), there were approximatley 221 rashes reported, 124 of which were not reported short form. 2 was identified as severe,1 was fatal and one with major injury, pedestrian and rear end. Excluding short form crash reports, the crash severity included 1- Fatal, 3- Major Injury, 15-Minor Injury, 28-Possible Injury, and 77-Property Damage. The 124 crash types are broken down by: 4-Angle, 0-Bike, 2-Hit Fixed Object, 3-Left Turn, 2-Pedestrian, 85-Rear End, 5-Right Turn, 3-Run Off Road, 14-Sideswipe, 2-U-Turn, and 0-Unknown. 1-75 Interchange Page 2 of 4 FDOT ICE: Stage 1 Control Strategy Evaluation Provide a brief justification as to why each of the following control strategies should be advanced or not. Justification should consider potential environmental impacts. CAP-X Outputs V/C Ratio Justification Weekday AM Weekday PM Multimodal SPICE Strategy to Be Control Strategy Peak Peak Score Ranking Advanced? Currently Configured as an Interchange Two -Way Stop- N/A N/A N/A N/A No Controlled Currently Configured as an Interchange All -Way Stop- N/A N/A N/A N/A No Controlled Currently Configured as an Interchange Signalized N/A N/A N/A NIA No Control Currently Configured as an Interchange Roundabout N/A N/A N/A N/A No Currently Configured as an Interchange Median U-Turn N/A N/A N/A N/A No Currently Configured as an Interchange RCUT N/A N/A N/A N/A No (Signalized) Currently Configured as an Interchange RCUT N/A N/A NIA N/A No (Unsignalized) Currently Configured as an Interchange Jughandle No Currently Configured as an Interchange Displaced Left- N/A N/A NIA N/A Yes Turn Currently Configured as an Interchange Continuous N/A N/A N/A N/A No Green Tee Currently Configured as an Interchange Quadrant N/A N/A NIA No Roadway Partial Cloverleaf A E- 0.96 1.17 3.3 Yes W Partial Cloverleaf B E- 1.02 1.13 2.4 Yes W 1-75 Interchange Page 3 of 4 FDOT ICE: Stage 1 Resolution To be filled out by FDOT District Traffic Operations Engineer and District Design Engineer Project Determination Multiple Viable Alternatives Identified: Continue to Stage 2 Comments DTOE Name Signature Date DDE Name Signature Date 1-75 Interchange Page 4 of 4 Input Worksheet 1 Project Name: Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Stud Project Number: D3191200 Location Collier County, FL Date January 16, 2020 Number of Intersection Legs Major Street Direction East-West VolumeTraffic • Volume (Veh/hr) Percent (%) U-Turn Left Thru Right Heavy Vehicles Volume Growth Eastbound 0 690 2452 517 8.38% 2.00% 1 710 3046 1482 4.71 % 2.00% 0 1418 7213 1374 12.54% 2.97% 0 1111 5958 608 4.51 % 3.91 % Westbound Southbound Northbound Adjustment Factor 0.80 0.95 0.85 Suggested 0.80 0.95 0.85 Truck to PCE Factor Suggested = 2.00 2.00 FDOT Context Zone C4-General Urban Residential Critical Lane Volume Threshold 2-phase signal Suggested = 1800 1800 3-phase signal Suggested = 1750 1750 4-phase signal Suggested = 1700 1700 Equivalent•Volume Volume (Veh/hr) U-Turn Left Thru Right Eastbound 0 1 0 0 763 2711 572 3253 1583 8359 1592 6470 660 Westbound 758 Southbound 1643 Northbound 1207 Left -Turn Adjustment Factoi Conversion of left -turning vehicles to equivalent through vehicles Right -turn Adjustment Factoi Conversion of right -turning vehicles to equivalent through vehicles U-turn Adjustment Factoi Conversion of U-turning vehicles to equivalent through vehicles Truck to PCE Factor 1 truck = X Passenger Car Equivalents Critical Lane Volume Sum Limi Saturation Value for Critical Lane Volume Sum at an intersection Capacity Analysis for Planning of Junctions 1-75 AM Capacity. • of • Step 2A: Base Conditions Analysis Traffic Signal Number of Lanes for Existing Configuration (Can be edited in "3- Alt Nurn Lanes Input" as needed) Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound TYPE OF INTERSECTION Sheet U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R Traffic Signal FULL 2 3 2 2 3 2 2 4 1 2 4 1 Results for Existing Configuration TYPE OF Zone 1 (North) zone 2 (south) Zone 3 (East) INTERSECTION Sheet CLV VIC CLV VIC CLV VIC Zone 4 (west) zones (center) CLV VIC CLV VIC Traffic Signal FULL Existing Configuration Results Overall v/c Pedestrian Bicycle Ratio Accommodation Poor Accommodation Transit Puur Accommodation Fair Step 2B: Alternative Selection Rankings Inclusion Yes/No Comment Continue to Step 3 Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study Project Name: D3191200 Project Number: Collier County, FL Location: January 16, 2020 Date: Major Street East-West Direction At -Grade Non -Roundabout Intersections? No Traffic Signal Two -Way Stop Control Existing Signal All -Way Stop Control Existing Signal Continuous Green T 4 Leg Intersection Quadrant Roadway S-W No Development in Quadrant N-E Commercial Present in Quadrant S-E Commercial Present in Quadrant N-W No Development in Quadrant Partial Displaced Left Turn Displaced Left Turn Signalized Restricted Crossing U-Turn Unsignalized Restricted Crossing U-Turn Existing Signal Median U-Turn Partial Median U-Turn Roundabouts? No 50 ICD Miniroundabout 75 CD Miniroundaobut 1x1 1 NS x 2EW 2NS x 1EW 2x2 Grade Separated Interchanges? Yes Diamond Yes Partial Cloverleaf A Yes Partial Cloverleaf B Yes Displaced Left Turn Interchange Yes Diverging Diamond Interchange Yes Single Point Yes I-75 AM Input Worksheet 2 Input Worksheet 2 Number of Lanes for Non -roundabout Intersections ® II ©©PS FAFA©© FAMINE PAPAPAPA ® IIIIIIII II ©II © II ©MPASOME ® SOME II ©©II IIIIIIII FAMINE ® FAMINE 1210III/ INFAME SEEM Quadrant Roadway ®O©©oO©©oO©ooNunn •-- • ®00©©00©©OOOOOOOO '• ®00©©00©OOOOOOOOO ®II man II©©©©I/MOaI/MO Input Worksheet 2 Number TYPE OF INTERCHANGE of Lanes for Interchanges ®OOOOOOO ��©OO©OO ®O©O©O©O©OOOOOOOO Di.pla-cl Left Turn Immokelee Road Corridor Congestion Study Collier County, FL Volume Echo with Shared Lane Adjustment for Non -roundabout Intersections ®IBM ®'' IIIMMMIMIBM=PAV M®EM ®IBM='' OIMMMMOM®®OM®M ®PIAV [M=000=1M000®0000 ®00000IM0EM 00®000®= ®oIMMMoIMMMEMoo®®oM®10 ®NON@Av NON@AvImn0=000®12 • ®O��O��IIIIII®IIIIII� ® ROOM NO 0 ROOM NO Im OOP®® 0M®IM ® O ioMM 0 ioEMIM ioio®® OR io®10 ®IIOMMIIOEMIMOII®®OO®IM ®OOMMOOEMIMOm®®OM®10 ®REIM=1I1=1MOII®®OII®IM Capacity Analysis for Planning of Junctions 1-75 AM Capacity Analysis for Planning of Junctions 1-75 AM Results Worksheet Results for Interchanges TYPE OF Zone 1 (Rt Zone 2 (U Zone 3 (Ctr. Zone 4 (Ctr. Zone 5 (U Zone 6 (Rt INTERCHANGE Ratio E E AllPartial Cloverleaf A CloverleafPartial - Displaced Left Turn k11 MMMDiverging EMNI, mm Diamond \rF \ Interchange v� � an Capacity Analysis for Planning of Junctions 1-75 AM Overall TYPE OF INTERSECTION I(imv V/C atio V/C Ranking Multimodal Score Pedestrian Accommodations Bicycle Accommodations Transit Accommodations Partial Cloverleaf A E-W \Poor Partial Cloverleaf B E-W ON Poor AL Fair Fair Fair Single Point E-W Poor Poor Fair Poor Poor Fair Diamond E-W 00101, Poor Poor Fair Single Point N-S Poor Poor Fair Partial Cloverleaf A N-S Poor Poor Fair Partial Cloverleaf B N-S Poor Poor Fair Poor Poor Fair 1-75 AM Summary Report - Page 1 of 2 Project Name: Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study Project Number: D3191200 Location: Collier County, FL Date: January 16, 2020 Number of Intersection Legs: Major Street Direction East-West Volume- Traffic • Volume (Veh/hr) Percent (%) U-Turn Left Thru Right Heavy Vehicles Volume Growth Eastbound 0 690 2452 517 8.38% 2.00% Westbound 1 710 3046 1482 4.71 % 2.00% Southbound 0 1418 7213 1374 12.54% 2.97% Northbound 0 1111 5958 608 4.51 % 3.91 % Adjustment Factor 0.80 0.95 0.85 0.80 0.95 0.85 Suggested Truck to PCE Factor Suggested = 2.00 2.00 FDOT Context Zone C4-General Urban Residential Critical Lane Volume Threshold 2-phase signal Suggested = 1800 1800 3-phase signal Suggested = 1750 1750 4-phase signal Suggested = 1700 1700 Summary Report - Page 2 of 2 • • Partial Cloverleaf A E-W • 0.96 1 •. 1.5 . ... . . ... . . • • . Poor Poor Fair Partial Cloverleaf B E-W 1.02 2 1.5 Poor Poor Fair Diverging Diamond Interchange E-W 1.16 3 3.3 Fair Fair Fair Single Point E-W 1.22 4 2.4 Poor Poor Fair Displaced Left Turn (Interchange) E-W 2.75 5 2.4 Poor Poor Fair Diamond E-W 3.87 6 2.4 Poor Poor Fair Single Point N-S 5.66 7 2.4 Poor Poor Fair Partial Cloverleaf A N-S 5.78 8 1.5 Poor Poor Fair Partial Cloverleaf B N-S 5.91 9 1.5 Poor Poor Fair Displaced Left Turn (Interchange) N-S 6.28 10 2.4 Poor Poor Fair 1-75 AM Project Name: Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Stud Project Number: D3191200 Location: Collier County, FL Date: January 16, 2020 Number of Intersection Legs: Major Street Direction: East-West Traffic Volume Demand Volume (Veh/hr) Percent (%) U-Turn 11 Left *1 Thru 1 Right f* Heavy Vehicles Volume Growth Eastbound 0 690 2452 517 8.38% 2.00% Westbound 1 710 3046 1482 4.71% 2.00% Southbound 0 1418 7213 1374 12.54% 2.97% Northbound 0 1111 5958 608 4.51% 3.91% Adjustment Factor0.80 Factor 0.95 0.85 0.80 0.95 T 0.85 Suggested Truck to PCE Factor Suggested = 2.00 2.00 FDOT Context Zone C4-General Urban Residential Critical Lane Volume Threshold 2-phase signal Suggested = 1800 1800 3-phase signal Suggested = 1750 1750 4-phase signal Suggested = 1700 1700 1-75 AM Number of Lanes TYPE OF for Non -roundabout Intersections OQQQOQQQOQQQOQQQ Two-Way Stop Control II ©©Q II ©©Q II ©QQ II ©QQ Continuous Green T ®II©©IIIIII©QII©IIQIIIIIIII ®IIIII/II II QI/ Q II ©QII IIII QQ ®IIII©QII©©IIIIIIIIIIIIQIIQ AI/QII©III/I/III/I/QQII©QII Quadrant RoadwayPartial ®I/QQQ IIII Q� I/QQQ I/QQQ ®IIII Q� II QQQ II QQQ II Q00 �7I/Q0� I/QQQ I/Q0� III/00 Displaced -ft Turn ®II©©DII©©QII©QQII©QQ Q�7 II ©©D II ©©Q II ©QQ II ©QQ • .. -. - Q�II©©DII©©QII©QQII©QQ ® QQQQQQQQ I/I/I/Q I/I/I/Q �7u IIIIII©IIIIII©QQQQQQQQ Unsignalized Restricted Crossing U- Turn ®QQ©©QQ©Q I/I/I/Q I/I/I/Q �7u IIIIII©IIIIII©QQQQQQQQ Median U-Turn ®Q II©©Q II©©I/I/QQ I/ I/QQ ■�u7 IIII ©©IIII ©©Q II/QQQ I/QQ Partial Median U-Turn ®QII ©©QII ©Q II ©QQ II ©QQ Qom■ II©©D II©©©Q II/QQQ I/QQ Number of Lanes for Interchanges TYPE OF INTERCHANGE ®D�QQD�Q�D�QQD�QQ II ©QD II ©QD II ©QQ II ©QQ Partial Cloverleaf A IIDI/DIIDII©I/I/QI/I/I/QII Partial Cloverleaf B ®I/Q®II ©®I/QI/Q I/QI/Q II©II©II©II©II Una IIUna Displaced -ft Turn I/QQQI/Q®II Una I/QQQ I©Q©II©Q©I©QQI©QQ Diverging Diamond Interchange ®II®II®I/QI/QI/QI/Q II©II©II©II©I©QQI©QQ I/Q®II©®II©QQII©QQ II ©Q©II ©Q©II ©QQ II ©QQ 1-75 AM Results for Non -roundabout Intersections Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 4 Zone 5 ' Overall TYPE OF INTERSECTION mmmmm�mmmm (North) (South) (West) (Center) v1c III Ratio �m Two -Way Stop Control mm All -Way Stop Control ® mm mm mm Continuous Green T INE �� \ MEN �OW\ Quadrant Roadway MEMEN Partial Displaced Left Turn Displaced Left Turn Signalized Restricted Crossing U-Turn \� \ \ \ O\1 E-W M� Median U-Turn Partial Median U-Turn EE MEN 1-75 AM Detailed Report - Page 4 of 4 Results for Interchanges Zone 1 Zone 2 (Lt Zone 3 Zone 4 Zone 5 (Lt Zone 6 Ratio E Partial Cloverleaf A Partial Cloverleaf B Displaced Left Diverging Diamond Interchange NEEME 1-75 AM Input Worksheet 1 Project Name: Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Stud Project Number: D3191200 Location Collier County, FL Date January 16, 2020 Number of Intersection Legs Major Street Direction East-West VolumeTraffic • Volume (Veh/hr) Percent (%) U-Turn Left Thru Right Heavy Vehicles Volume Growth Eastbound 6 903 3618 662 3.91 % 2.00% 8 225 2004 512 4.20% 2.00% 0 1589 7794 694 4.93% 2.97% 0 743 6303 632 4.16% 3.91 % Westbound Southbound Northbound Adjustment Factor 0.80 0.95 0.85 0.80 0.95 0.85 Suggested Truck to PCE Factor Suggested = 2.00 2.00 FDOT Context Zone C4-General Urban Residential Critical Lane Volume Threshold 2-phase signal Suggested = 1800 1800 3-phase signal Suggested = 1750 1750 4-phase signal Suggested = 1700 1700 Equivalent•Volume Volume (Veh/hr) U-Turn I q Left 11 Thru Right r+ Eastbound 6 9 0 0 957 - 3835 702 2130 544 8421 750 Westbound 239 Southbound 1717 Northbound 804 6822 684 Left -Turn Adjustment Factoi Conversion of left -turning vehicles to equivalent through vehicles Right -turn Adjustment Factoi Conversion of right -turning vehicles to equivalent through vehicles U-turn Adjustment Factoi Conversion of U-turning vehicles to equivalent through vehicles Truck to PCE Factor 1 truck = X Passenger Car Equivalents Critical Lane Volume Sum Limi Saturation Value for Critical Lane Volume Sum at an intersection Capacity Analysis for Planning of Junctions 1-75 PM Capacity. • of • Step 2A: Base Conditions Analysis Traffic Signal Number of Lanes for Existing Configuration (Can be edited in "3- Alt Nurn Lanes Input" as needed) Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound TYPE OF INTERSECTION Sheet U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R Traffic Signal FULL 2 3 2 2 3 2 2 4 1 2 4 1 Results for Existing Configuration TYPE OF Zone 1 (North) zone 2 (South) Zone 3 (East) INTERSECTION Sheet CLV VIC CLV VIC CLV VIC Zone 4 (west) zones (center) CLV VIC CLV VIC Traffic Signal FULL Existing Configuration Results Overall v/c Pedestrian Bicycle Ratio Accommodation Poor Accommodation Transit Puur Accommodation Fair Step 2B: Alternative Selection Rankings Inclusion Yes/No Comment Continue to Step 3 Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study Project Name: D3191200 Project Number: Collier County, FL Location: January 16, 2020 Date: Major Street East-West Direction At -Grade Non -Roundabout Intersections? No Traffic Signal Two -Way Stop Control Existing Signal All -Way Stop Control Existing Signal Continuous Green T 4 Leg Intersection Quadrant Roadway S-W No Development in Quadrant WE Commercial Present in Quadrant S-E Commercial Present in Quadrant N-W No Development in Quadrant Partial Displaced Left Turn Displaced Left Turn Signalized Restricted Crossing U-Turn Unsignalized Restricted Crossing U-Turn Existing Signal Median U-Turn Partial Median U-Turn Roundabouts? No 50 CD Miniroundabout 75 CD Miniroundaobut 1x1 1 NS x 2EW 2NS x 1EW 2x2 Grade Separated Interchanges? Yes Diamond Yes Partial Cloverleaf A Yes Partial Cloverleaf B Yes Displaced Left Turn Interchange Yes Diverging Diamond Interchange Yes Single Point Yes I-75 PM Input Worksheet 2 Input Worksheet 2 Number of Lanes for Non -roundabout Intersections ® II ©©I/ I/II ©© FAMINE 1212120 ®IIIIIIIIII©II©II©MPAPROBE ® PROBE II ©©II IIIIIIII II ©IIO ® FAMINE 1210III/ I/INBE Fl uarl Quadrant Roadway ®O©©oO©©oO©ooNunn •-- • ®00©©00©©OOOOOOOO '• ®00©©00©OOOOOOOOO Input Worksheet 2 Number TYPE OF INTERCHANGE of Lanes for Interchanges ®OOOOOOO ��©OO©OO Displaced Left Turn Immokelee Road Corridor Congestion Study Collier County, FL Volume Echo with Shared Lane Adjustment for Non -roundabout Intersections Quadrant R..d..y ®RVARVAMMRVARVAMO0 PIREEM 0PIVAMO ® 0� MM 0� =0 � MEMO 10 MEMO IS =RVAMMOollEMOoOMO Capacity Analysis for Planning of Junctions 1-75 PM Capacity Analysis for Planning of Junctions 1-75 PM Results Worksheet Results for Interchanges TYPE Zone 1 (Rt Zone 2 (U Zone 3 (Ctr. Zone 4 (Ctr. Zone 5 (U Zone 6 (Rt INTERCHANGE Ratio E E ®®®®®®®®®®®® Partial Cloverleaf A MMM� Partial Cloverleaf ...o Displaced Left Turn... Diverging Diamond Interchange M inommomme "mum, smoMMOMME"MIN MM Capacity Analysis for Planning of Junctions 1-75 PM Overall TYPE OF INTERSECTION I V/C V/C Ranking Multimodal Score Pedestrian Accommodations Bicycle Accommodations Transit Accommodations Ratio Partial Cloverleaf B E-W Poor Partial Cloverleaf A E-W IN Poor Fair Fair Fair IN Single Point E-W Poor Poor Fair Poor Poor Fair Diamond E-W EMEMM Poor Poor Fair Partial Cloverleaf A N-S 01110 moMMOMMERM Poor Poor Fair Single Point N-S womomm- Poor Poor Fair Partial Cloverleaf B N-S Poor Poor Fair Poor Poor Fair 1-75 PM Summary Report - Page 1 of 2 Project Name: Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study Project Number: D3191200 Location: Collier County, FL Date: January 16, 2020 Number of Intersection Legs: Major Street Direction East-West Volume- Traffic • Volume (Veh/hr) Percent (%) U-Turn Left Thru Right Heavy Vehicles Volume Growth Eastbound 6 903 3618 662 3.91 % 2.00% Westbound 8 225 2004 512 4.20% 2.00% Southbound 0 1589 7794 694 4.93% 2.97% Northbound 0 743 6303 632 4.16% 3.91 % Adjustment Factor 0.80 0.95 0.85 0.80 0.95 0.85 Suggested Truck to PCE Factor Suggested = 2.00 2.00 FDOT Context Zone C4-General Urban Residential Critical Lane Volume Threshold 2-phase signal Suggested = 1800 1800 3-phase signal Suggested = 1750 1750 4-phase signal Suggested = 1700 1700 Summary Report - Page 2 of 2 • • Partial Cloverleaf B E-W •WAR 1.13 1 .. 1.5 . ... • 1. .•. . • ••. Poor Poor Fair Partial Cloverleaf A E-W 1.17 2 1.5 Poor Poor Fair Diverging Diamond Interchange E-W 1.17 2 3.3 Fair Fair Fair Single Point E-W 1.39 4 2.4 Poor Poor Fair Displaced Left Turn (Interchange) E-W 2.90 5 2.4 Poor Poor Fair Diamond E-W 3.81 6 2.4 Poor Poor Fair Partial Cloverleaf A N-S 5.70 7 1.5 Poor Poor Fair Single Point N-S 5.78 8 2.4 Poor Poor Fair Partial Cloverleaf B N-S 5.87 9 1.5 Poor Poor Fair Displaced Left Turn (Interchange) N-S 6.46 10 2.4 Poor Poor Fair 1-75 PM Project Name: Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Stud Project Number: D3191200 Location: Collier County, FL Date: January 16, 2020 Number of Intersection Legs: Major Street Direction: East-West Traffic Volume Demand Volume (Veh/hr) Percent (%) U-Turn 11 Left *1 Thru 1 Right f* Heavy Vehicles Volume Growth Eastbound 6 903 3618 662 3.91% 2.00% Westbound 8 225 2004 512 4.20% 2.00% Southbound 0 1589 7794 694 4.93% 2.97% Northbound 0 743 6303 632 4.16% 3.91% Adjustment Factor0.80 Factor 0.95 0.85 0.80 0.95 0.85 Suggested Truck to PCE Factor Suggested = 2.00 2.00 FDOT Context Zone C4-General Urban Residential Critical Lane Volume T Threshold 2-phase signal Suggested = 1800 1800 ih 3-phase signal p 9 Suggested = 1750 Su 1750 4-phase signal Suggested = 1700 1700 1-75 PM Number of Lanes TYPE OF for Non -roundabout Intersections OQQQOQQQOQQQOQQQ Two-Way Stop Control II ©©Q II ©©Q II ©QQ II ©QQ Continuous Green T ®II©©IIIIII©QII©IIQIIIIIIII ®IIIII/II II QI/ Q II ©QII IIII QQ ®IIII©QII©©IIIIIIIIIIIIQIIQ AI/QII©III/I/III/I/QQII©QII Quadrant RoadwayPartial ®I/QQQ IIII Q� I/QQQ I/QQQ ®IIII Q� II QQQ II QQQ II Q00 �7I/Q0� I/QQQ I/Q0� III/QD Displaced -ft Turn ®II©©DII©©QII©QQII©QQ Q�7 II ©©D II ©©Q II ©QQ II ©QQ • .. -. - Q�II©©DII©©QII©QQII©QQ �7u IIIIII©IIIIII©QQQQQQQQ Unsignalized Restricted Crossing U- Turn ®QQ©©QQ©Q I/I/I/Q I/I/I/Q �7u IIIIII©IIIIII©QQQQQQQQ Median U-Turn ®Q II©©Q II©©I/I/QQ I/ I/QQ ■ w�7I/II©©IIII©©©I/QQQI/QQ Partial Median U-Turn ®QII ©©DII ©Q II ©QQ II ©QQ �■ II ©©D I/ Q©©Q II/QQQ I/QQ Number of Lanes for Interchanges TYPE OF INTERCHANGE ®D�QQD�QQD�QQD�QQ II ©QD II ©QD II ©QQ II ©QQ Partial Cloverleaf A IIDI/DIIDII©I/I/QI/I/I/QII Partial Cloverleaf B ®I/Q®II ©®I/QI/Q I/QI/Q II©II©II©II©II©QQII©QQ Displaced -ft Turn I/QQQI/Q®II�I/QQQ II ©Q©II ©Q©II ©QQ II ©QQ Diverging Diamond Interchange ®II®II®I/QI/QI/QI/Q II©II©II©II©II©QQII©QQ Emu I/Q®II©®II©QQI/QQQ II ©Q©II ©Q©II ©QQ II ©QQ 1-75 PM Results for Non -roundabout Intersections Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 4 Zone 5 ' Overall TYPE OF INTERSECTION mmmmm�mm� (North) (South) (West) (Center) v1c III Ratio �m mmmmmmmm Two -Way Stop Control All -Way Stop Control Continuous Green T WE �EE EEN \ �� . ... .. EN ME Displaced Left Turn �� DisplacedPartial Signalized Restricted Crossing U-Turn .�10911, Unsignalized Restricted Crossing U-Turn M� Median U-Turn 1-75 PM Detailed Report - Page 4 of 4 Results for Interchanges Zone 1 Zone 2 (Lt Zone 3 Zone 4 Zone 5 (Lt Zone 6 Ratio E Partial Cloverleaf A Partial Cloverleaf B Displaced Left Turn Diverging Diamond 111MEMEMMEMEN Interchange ® �E�� \EEMME 1-75 PM Florida Department of Transportation Intersection Control Evaluation Form 750-010-30 Intersection Control Evaluation (ICE) Form Stage 1: Screening To fulfill the requirements of Stage 1 (Screening) of FDOT's ICE procedures, complete the following form and append all supporting documentation. Completed forms can be submitted to the District Traffic Operations Engineer (DTOE) and District Design Engineer (DDE) for the project's approval. Project Name Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study FDOT Project # Date 09/15/20 Submitted By Robert Grubel Agency/Companyl Jacobs Engineering, Inc. I Emaill Robert.Grubel@jacobs.com FDOT Context Classification I C4 - Urban General I FDOT Districtl District 1 1 Countyl Collier Project Locality (City/Town/Village) Collier County I Project Typel Corridor Improvement Project The 2018 AUIR projects the intersection of Livingston Road and Immokalee Road to be deficient by 2023 and Project Purpose (What Immokalee Road from I-75 to Logan Boulevard to be deficient by 2026. is the catalyst for this project and why is it being undertaken?) Project Setting Description The northwest corner is commercial including restaurants and a 7-Eleven. The northeast corner contains a (Describe the area surrounding the retention pond. The southwest corner is commercial including restaurants, a Target, and a CVS drug store. intersection ) The southeast corner contains a church. Sidewalk exists along the eastbound direction on Immokalee Road and multiuse path along the westbound Mu al Context approach only on the east side of Northbrook Drive. Sidewalk runs along the southbound approach of Tarpon bicycle (Describe the pedestrian, bicyycle, , and transit Bay Boulevard and the southbound approach of Northbrooke Drive. There are no bike lane facilites on any of activity in the area and the potential for the approaches. Bus service travels along Immokalee Road however no stops are located at this intersection. activity based on surrounding land uses and development patterns ) Major Street Information Route #: CR 846 1 Route Name(s)l Immokalee Road Milepost Existing Control Type Signal Existing AADT 63,700 Design Year AADT 93,600 Design Vehicle Interstate Semitrailer (WB-62) Control Vehicle Interstate Semitrailer (WB-62) Primary Functional Classification Urban Principal Arterial Design Speed (mph) 45 Secondary Functional Classification (if app.)i Target Speed (mph) [if app.] 45 Direction Eastbound Number of Lanes Study Period #1 Traffic Volumes Study Period #2 Traffic Volumes Sidewalks along Both sides of the approach Left -Turn 1 �* Crosswalk on Approach? Yes Left -Through 0 Weekday AM Peak Weekday PM Peak o On -Street Bike Facilities? No Through 3 Left 383 Left 378 Q Multi -Use Path. No Left -Through -Right 0 Through 2,205 Through 3,232 Scheduled Bus Service? Yes Through-Rightl 0 Right 219 Right 499 Bus Stop on Approach? No Right-Turril 1 Daily Truck % 7.4% Direction Westbound Number of Lanes Study Period #1 Traffic Volumes Study Period #2 Traffic Volumes Sidewalks along: One side of the approach Left -Turn 2 Crosswalk on Approach? Yes Left -Through 0 Weekday AM Peak Weekday PM Peak o On -Street Bike Facilities? No Through 3 Left 119 Left 139 Q Multi -Use Path? Yes Left -Through -Right 0 Through 3,784 Through 1,684 Scheduled Bus Service? Yes Through -Right 0 Right 78 Right 21 Bus Stop on Approach? No Right -Turn 1 Daily Truck % 5.5% Northbrooke Dr / Tarpon Bay Blvd Page 1 of 4 FDOT ICE: Stage 1 Minor Street Information Route #: 1 Route Name(s)l Tarpon Bay Blvd / Northbrooke Dr Milepost (if app.) Existing Control Typel Signal Existing AADT 900 Design Year AADTJ 1,500 Design Vehicle I Interstate Semitrailer (WB-62) Control Vehiclel Interstate Semitrailer (WB-62) Primary Functional Classificationi Urban Major Collector Design Speed (mph)l 30 Secondary Functional Classification (if app.)i Urban Minor Arterial Target Speed (mph) [if app.]l 30 Direction Northbound Number of Lanes Study Period #1 Traffic Volumes Study Period #2 Traffic Volumes Sidewalks along: Both sides of the approach Left -Turn 1 �* Crosswalk on Approach? Yes Left -Through 1 Weekday AM Peak Weekday PM Peak o On -Street Bike Facilities? No Through 0 Left 518 Left 490 Multi -Use Path. No Left -Through -Right 0 Through 142 Through 197 Scheduled Bus Service? No Through-Rightl 0 Right 167 Right 176 Bus Stop on Approach? No Right-Tuml 1 Daily Truck % 2.0% Direction Southbound Number of Lanes Study Period #1 Traffic Volumes Study Period #2 Traffic Volumes Sidewalks along: Both sides of the approach Left -Turn 1 Crosswalk on Approach? Yes Left -Through 0 Weekday AM Peak Weekday PM Peak o On -Street Bike Facilities? No Through 1 Left 120 Left 193 Q Multi -Use Path? No Left -Through -Right 0 Throughl 86 Through 91 Scheduled Bus Service? No Through -Right 0 Rightl 438 Right 225 Bus Stop on Approach? No Right -Turn 1 Daily Truck % 3.2% Direction Number of Lanes Study Period #1 Traffic Volumes Study Period #2 Traffic Volumes Sidewalks along: Left -Turn Crosswalk on Approach? Left -Through Weekday AM Peak Weekday PM Peak o On -Street Bike Facilities? Through Left Left Q Multi -Use Path? Left -Through -Right Through Through Scheduled Bus Service? Through-Rightl I Right Right Bus Stop on Approach? Right-Turni I Daily Truck Crash History (Existing Intersections Only) Append the most recent five -years of crash data for the intersection from the CAR System. If the crash data evidences any issues relating to safety performance, discuss briefly here: Within the last five years (2014-2018), there were approximatley 211 crashes reported, 85 of which were not reported short form. 2 were fatal and 2 causing major injury. Excluding short form crash reports, the crash severity included 2- Fatal, 2- Major Injury, 12-Minor Injury, 17-Possible Injury, and 52-Property Damage. The 85 crash types are broken down by: 22-Angle, 0-Bike, 1-Head On, 3-Hit Fixed Object, 3-Left Turn, 1-Pedestrian, 45-Rear End, 2-Right Turn, and 8-Sideswipe. Note: Of the 246 total reported crashes, 30 were angle crashes. The Fatal and incapacitating crashes were both travelling EB during AM peak hour, ran red light, and hit by NB traveller. Northbrooke Dr / Tarpon Bay Blvd Page 2 of 4 FDOT ICE: Stage 1 Control Strategy Evaluation Provide a brief justification as to why each of the following control strategies should be advanced or not. Justification should consider potential environmental impacts. CAP-X Outputs V/C Ratio Justification Weekday AM Weekday PM Multimodal SPICE Strategy to Be Control Strategy Peak Peak Score Ranking Advanced? Currently a signalized intersection. Two -Way Stop- N/A N/A N/A N/A No Controlled Currently a signalized intersection. All -Way Stop N/A N/A N/A N/A No Controlled Signalized 1.65 1.23 2.4 4 Yes Control Traffic volumes too high for efficient roundabout Roundabout 20.43 16.97 2.8 7 No operation. Median U-Turn 1.48 1.16 3.1 1 Yes High v/c ratio compared to alternatives. RCUT 1.30 1.26 3.1 9 No (Signalized) RCUT N/A N/A N/A N/A No (Unsignalized) Jughandle 2 Yes Displaced Left- 1.11 0.93 2.4 3 Yes Turn Currently a 4-Leg intersection. Continuous N/A N/A N/A N/A No Green Tee Not Available Space Quadrant 1.59 1.39 2.2 No Roadway Partial Displaced 1.16 1.01 2.4 Yes Left Turn Improved Signalized 1.50 1.01 2.4 4 Yes Control Northbrooke Dr / Tarpon Bay Blvd Page 3 of 4 FDOT ICE: Stage 1 Resolution To be filled out by FDOT District Traffic Operations Engineer and District Design Engineer Project Determination Multiple Viable Alternatives Identified: Continue to Stage 2 Comments DTOE Name Signature Date DDE Name Signature Date Northbrooke Dr / Tarpon Bay Blvd Page 4 of 4 Input Worksheet 1 Project Name: Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Stud Project Number: D3191200 Location Collier County, FL Date September 4, 2020 Number of Intersection Legs Major Street Direction East-West VolumeTraffic • Volume (Veh/hr) Percent (%) U-Turn Left Thru Right Heavy Vehicles Volume Growth Eastbound 0 383 2205 219 10.91 % 2.00% 0 119 3784 78 5.56% 2.28% 0 120 86 438 3.60% 1.58% 2 516 142 167 2.69% 3.17% Westbound Southbound Northbound Adjustment Factor 0.80 0.95 0.85 Suggested 0.80 0.95 0.85 Truck to PCE Factor Suggested = 2.00 2.00 FDOT Context Zone C4-General Urban Residential Critical Lane Volume Threshold 2-phase signal Suggested = 1800 1800 3-phase signal Suggested = 1750 1750 4-phase signal Suggested = 1700 1700 Equivalent•Volume Volume (Veh/hr) U-Turn Left Thru Right Eastbound 0 0 0 2 433 2494 248 4085 84 91 461 Westbound 128 Southbound 126 Northbound 547 150 177 Left -Turn Adjustment Factoi Conversion of left -turning vehicles to equivalent through vehicles Right -turn Adjustment Factoi Conversion of right -turning vehicles to equivalent through vehicles U-turn Adjustment Factoi Conversion of U-turning vehicles to equivalent through vehicles Truck to PCE Factor 1 truck = X Passenger Car Equivalents Critical Lane Volume Sum Limi Saturation Value for Critical Lane Volume Sum at an intersection Capacity Analysis for Planning of Junctions Northbrooke / Tarpon Bay AM Capacity. • of • Step 2A: Base Conditions Analysis Traffic Signal Number of Lanes for Existing Configuration (Can be edited in "3- Alt Nurn Lanes input" as needed) Westbound Northbound SoutMUL TYPE OF INTERSECTION Sheet U L T R U LTraffic Signal FULL 1 1 1 1 2 3 1 Results for Existing Configuration TYPE OF Zone 1 (North) zone 2 (south) Zone 3 (East) INTERSECTION Sheet CLV VIC CLV VIC CLV VIC Zone 4 (west) zones (center) CLV VIC CLV VIC Traffic Signal FULL Existing Configuration Results Overall v/c Pedestrian Bicycle Ratio Accommodation Poor Accommodation Transit Puur Accommodation Fair Step 2B: Alternative Selection Rankings Inclusion Yes/No Comment Continue to Step 3 Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study Project Name: D3191200 Project Number: Collier County, FL Location: September 4, 2020 Date: Major Street East-West Direction At -Grade Non -Roundabout Intersections? Yes Traffic Signal Yes Two -Way Stop Control No Existing Signal All -Way Stop Control No Existing Signal Continuous Green T No 4 Leg Intersection Quadrant Roadway S-W No Residential Present in Quadrant N-E No Commercial Present in Quadrant S-E No Residential Present in Quadrant N-W No Electrical Substation in Quadrant Partial Displaced Left Turn Yes Displaced Left Turn Yes Signalized Restricted Crossing U-Turn Yes Unsignalized Restricted Crossing U-Turn No Existing Signal Median U-Turn Yes Partial Median U-Turn Yes Roundabouts? No lumes too high for efficient roundabout 50 ICD Miniroundabout 75 ICD Miniroundaobut 1x1 1 NS x 2EW 2NS x 1EW 2x2 Grade Separated Interchanges? No Diamond Not enough available space Partial Cloverleaf A Not enough available space Partial Cloverleaf B Not enough available space Displaced Left Turn Interchange Diverging Diamond Interchange Single Point Northbrooke /Tarpon Bay AM Input Worksheet 2 Input Worksheet 2 Collier Coue,ty, FL Number of Lanes for Non -roundabout Intersections Continuous Green T ®OOQO0000OQOO �� ® FAMOII IIOII0II EUVASOME ®00000000 OOOO O©OO Qu.dnmt Roadway ®0000000000©oo©©o •-- • ®0000000000000000 ®O000000000©000©0 '• ®OOOOOOOQOOOQOOOO ®O000000000©000©0 ®QOO�QO00OO©QO©©� ®o nun 000000©o©o©o Input Worksheet 2 Number TYPE OF INTERCHANGE of Lanes for Interchanges 0000000000©QO©©0 ®OOOOOOOOOOOO©OO ®OQOOOOOQOO©��©O ® 000 0000 OOOO �© OO ®O QOQO QOQO O©QO ©©0 Di.pl.ced Left Turn ®0000000000©QO©©0 . ® 000 0000 OOOO �© OO Immokelee Road Corridor Congestion Study Collier Coctnty, FL Volume Echo with Shared Lane Adjustment for Non -roundabout Intersections A I VP KIP ®PIVAM®' ®PIVAMMMROME=PIVAMMO ®nM=MnMW0MM=0MMMm ®nM=MnMW0MM=0M=®' m Capacity Analysis for Planning of Junctions Northbrooke / Tarpon Bay AM Capacity Analysis for Planning of Junctions Northbrooke / Tarpon Bay AM Results Worksheet Results for Interchanges TYPE OF Zone 1 (Rt Zone 2 (U Zone 3 (Ctr. Zone 4 (Ctr. Zone 5 (U Zone 6 (Rt INTERCHANGE Ratio E E ®®®®®®®®®®®® ® 'PAP Partial Cloverleaf A I AV Displaced Left Turn Diverging Diamond Capacity Analysis for Planning of Junctions Northbrooke / Tarpon Bay AM Overall TYPE OF INTERSECTION V/C V/C Ranking Multimodal Score Pedestrian Accommodations Bicycle Accommodations Transit Accommodations Ratio Displaced Left Turn WESignalized Poor Partial Displaced Left Turn E-W Poor Restricted Crossing U- Fair Fair Poor Northbrooke / Tarpon Bay AM Summary Report - Page 1 of 2 Project Name: Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study Project Number: D3191200 Location: Collier County, FL Date: September 4, 2020 Number of Intersection Legs: Major Street Direction East-West Volume— Traffic • Volume (Veh/hr) Percent (%) U-Turn Left Thru Right Heavy Vehicles Volume Growth Eastbound 0 383 2205 219 10.91 % 2.00% Westbound 0 119 3784 78 5.56% 2.28% Southbound 0 120 86 438 3.60% 1.58% Northbound 2 516 142 167 2.69% 3.17% Adjustment Factor 0.80 0.95 0.85 0.80 0.95 0.85 Suggested Truck to PCE Factor Suggested = 2.00 2.00 FDOT Context Zone C4-General Urban Residential Critical Lane Volume Threshold 2-phase signal Suggested = 1800 1800 3-phase signal Suggested = 1750 1750 4-phase signal Suggested = 1700 1700 Summary Report - Page 2 of 2 TYPE OF INTERSECTION Displaced Left Turn Overall v/c Ratio 1.11 V/C Ranking 1 Multimodal Score 2.4 Pedestrian Bicycle Transit Accommodation Accommodation Accommodatio Poor Poorb. Fair Partial Displaced Left Turn E-W 1.16 2 2.4 Poor Poor Fair SignalizeSignalizea Kestrictedrossing - 1 urn 1.30 3 3.1 Fair Fair Partial Displaced Left Turn N-S 1.37 4 2.4 Poor Poor Fair Median U-Turn N-S 1.42 5 3.1 Fair Fair Po Partial Median U-Turn E-W 1.44 6 3.1 Fair Fair Poo Partial Median U-Turn N-S 1.46 7 3.1 Fair Fair Poo Median U-Turn E-W 1.48 8 3.1 Fair Fair P00 Traffic Signal 1.65 9 2.4 Poor Poor Fair bignalizeCl Kestrictedrossing - 1 urn 5.05 10 3.1r Fair Fair Poor J Northbrooke / Tarpon Bay AM Project Name: Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Stud Project Number: D3191200 Location: Collier County, FL Date: September 4, 2020 Number of Intersection Legs: Major Street Direction: East-West Traffic Volume Demand Volume (Veh/hr) Percent (%) U-Turn 11 Left *1 Thru 1 Right f* Heavy Vehicles Volume Growth Eastbound 0 383 2205 219 10.91% 2.00% Westbound 0 119 3784 78 5.56% 2.28% Southbound 0 120 86 438 3.60% 1.58% Northbound 2 516 142 167 2.69% 3.17% Adjustment Factor0.80 Factor 0.95 0.85 0.80 0.95 T 0.85 Suggested Truck to PCE Factor Suggested = 2.00 2.00 FDOT Context Zone C4-General Urban Residential Critical Lane Volume Threshold 2-phase signal Suggested = 1800 1800 3-phase signal Suggested = 1750 1750 4-phase signal Suggested = 1700 1700 Northbrooke / Tarpon Bay AM Number of Lanes TYPE OF for Non -roundabout Intersections OQQQOQQQOQQ�OQQ� � I/QQQ I/QQQ I/Q©QII©©Q Two-Way Stop Control I/QQQ I/QQQ I/Q©QII©©Q ■�►'•7I/QQQ I/QQQ I/Q©QII©©Q � I/QQQ I/QQQ I/Q©QII©©Q Continuous Green T ®IIQQIIIIIIQQIIQIIQIIIIIIII ®IIIII/II II QII Q II QQII IIII ©Q ®IIIIQQIIQQIIIIIPAVPAV IQIIQ A/Q/QIII/I/IIIIQQI/QQII Quadrant RoadwayPartial ® I/QQa II I/QQa I/QQQ ®IIII Q� II QQQ II QQQ II QQQ �7I/QQQ I/QQQ I/Q0� III/00 Displaced -ft Turn ®I/QQQI/QQQI/Q©QII©©Q Q�7II/QQQ I/QQQ I/Q©QII ©©Q • I/QQQ I/QQQ I/QQQ I/QQQ ® QQQQQQQQ I/I/I/Q I/I/I/Q ■u7IIIIIIQIIIIII000QQQQQQ Unsignalized Restricted Crossing U-® Turn QQQQQQQQ I/I/I/Q I/I/I/Q IIIQIIIQQQQQQQQQ Median U-Turn ® Q I/QQQ I/QQ II II QQ I/ I/QQ ■u7 IIII QQ IIII QQQ I/ QQ© I/ QQ Partial Median U-Turn ® QII QQQI/QQ I/QQQ I/QQQ Qom■ I/QQQ I/QQQQ II ©Q©II ©Q Number of Lanes for Interchanges TYPE OF INTERCHANGE II/QQQ II/QQQ I/Q©QII©©Q Partial Cloverleaf A IIQI/QIIQI/QI/II©I/I/I/DII Partial Cloverleaf B ®I/Q®I/Q®I/QI/Q I/QI/Q I/QI/QI/QI/QI/Q©QII©QQ Displaced -ft Turn I/QQQI/Q®II®QPIVA Q II QQQ II QQQ II Q©QII ©QQ Diverging Diamond Interchange ®II®II®I/QI/QI/QI/Q I/QI/QI/QI/QI/Q©QII©QQ I/Q®I/Q®I/Q©QII©©Q I/QQQ I/QQQ I/ Q©QII ©QQ Northbrooke / Tarpon Bay AM Results for Non -roundabout Intersections Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 4 Zone 5 ' Overall TYPE OF INTERSECTION mmmmm�mm� (North) (South) (West) (Center) v1c III Ratio �m E== Two -Way Stop Control All -Way Stop Control 'oy Continuous Green T ®.....vet ... Quadrant Roadway 11INNEWHANEWER" Partial Displaced Left Turn Displaced Left Turn 1\\\W A*\ le� KNOW Signalized Restricted Crossing U-Turn 110WH Partial Median U-Turn Northbrooke / Tarpon Bay AM Detailed Report - Page 4 of 4 Results for Interchanges Zone 1 Zone 2 (Lt Zone 3 Zone 4 Zone 5 (Lt Zone 6 Ratio E ®®®®®®®®®®®® Fair SEEMENWEEK11\1 Partial Cloverleaf A ANMEINEENWC Partial Cloverleaf B WEEN Displaced Left Turn Diverging Diamond 480 Interchange 1082 511 Northbrooke / Tarpon Bay AM Input Worksheet 1 Project Name: Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Stud Project Number: D3191200 Location Collier County, FL Date September 4, 2020 Number of Intersection Legs Major Street Direction East-West VolumeTraffic • Volume (Veh/hr) Percent (%) U-Turn Left Thru Right Heavy Vehicles Volume Growth Eastbound 14 364 3232 499 3.80% 2.00% 6 133 1684 21 5.38% 2.28% 0 193 91 225 2.75% 1.58% 0 490 197 176 1.25% 3.17% Westbound Southbound Northbound Adjustment Factor 0.80 0.95 0.85 Suggested 0.80 0.95 0.85 Truck to PCE Factor Suggested = 2.00 2.00 FDOT Context Zone C4-General Urban Residential Critical Lane Volume Threshold 2-phase signal Suggested = 1800 1800 3-phase signal Suggested = 1750 1750 4-phase signal Suggested = 1700 1700 Equivalent•Volume Volume (Veh/hr) U-Turn Left Thru Right Eastbound 15 6 0 0 385 3422 528 1815 23 95 235 Westbound 143 Southbound 201 Northbound 512 206 184 Left -Turn Adjustment Factoi Conversion of left -turning vehicles to equivalent through vehicles Right -turn Adjustment Factoi Conversion of right -turning vehicles to equivalent through vehicles U-turn Adjustment Factoi Conversion of U-turning vehicles to equivalent through vehicles Truck to PCE Factor 1 truck = X Passenger Car Equivalents Critical Lane Volume Sum Limi Saturation Value for Critical Lane Volume Sum at an intersection Capacity Analysis for Planning of Junctions Northbrooke / Tarpon Bay PM Capacity. • of • Step 2A: Base Conditions Analysis Traffic Signal Number of Lanes for Existing Configuration (Can be edited in "3- Alt Nurn Lanes input" as needed) Westbound Northbound SoutMUL TYPE OF INTERSECTION Sheet U L T R U LTraffic Signal FULL 1 1 1 1 2 3 1 Results for Existing Configuration TYPE OF Zone 1 (North) zone 2 (south) Zone 3 (East) INTERSECTION Sheet CLV VIC CLV VIC CLV VIC Zone 4 (west) zones (center) CLV VIC CLV VIC Traffic Signal FULL Existing Configuration Results Overall v/c Pedestrian Bicycle Ratio Accommodation Poor Accommodation Transit Puur Accommodation Fair Step 2B: Alternative Selection Rankings Inclusion Yes/No Comment Continue to Step 3 Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study Project Name: D3191200 Project Number: Collier County, FL Location: September 4, 2020 Date: Major Street East-West Direction At -Grade Non -Roundabout Intersections? Yes Traffic Signal Yes Two -Way Stop Control No Existing Signal All -Way Stop Control No Existing Signal Continuous Green T No 4 Leg Intersection Quadrant Roadway S-W No Residential Present in Quadrant N-E No Commercial Present in Quadrant S-E No Residential Present in Quadrant N-W No Electrical Substation in Quadrant Partial Displaced Left Turn Yes Displaced Left Turn Yes Signalized Restricted Crossing U-Turn Yes Unsignalized Restricted Crossing U-Turn No Existing Signal Median U-Turn Yes Partial Median U-Turn Yes Roundabouts? No lumes too high for efficient roundabout 50 ICD Miniroundabout 75 ICD Miniroundaobut 1x1 1 NS x 2EW 2NS x 1EW 2x2 Grade Separated Interchanges? No Diamond Not enough available space Partial Cloverleaf A Not enough available space Partial Cloverleaf B Not enough available space Displaced Left Turn Interchange Diverging Diamond Interchange Single Point Northbrooke /Tarpon Bay PM Input Worksheet 2 Input Worksheet 2 Collier Coue,ty, FL Number of Lanes for Non -roundabout Intersections Continuous Green T ®OOQO0000OQOO �� ® FAMOII IIOIME FRUMPASO©E ®00000000 OOOO O©OO Qu.dnmt Roadway ®0000000000©oo©©o •-- • ®0000000000000000 ®O000000000©000©0 '• ®OOOOOOOQOOOQOOOO ®O000000000©000©0 ®QOO�QO00OO©QO©©� ®o nun 000000©000©o Input Worksheet 2 Number TYPE OF INTERCHANGE of Lanes for Interchanges 0000000000©QO©©0 ®OOOOOOOOOOOO©OO ®OQOOOOOQOO©��©O ® 000 0000 OOOO �© OO ®O QOQO QOQO O©QO ©©0 Di.pl.ced Left Turn ®0000000000©QO©©0 . ® 000 0000 OOOO �© OO Immokelee Road Corridor Congestion Study Collier Coctnty, FL Volume Echo with Shared Lane Adjustment for Non -roundabout Intersections I VP KIP Capacity Analysis for Planning of Junctions Northbrooke / Tarpon Bay PM Capacity Analysis for Planning of Junctions Northbrooke / Tarpon Bay PM Results Worksheet Results for Interchanges TYPE OF Zone 1 (Rt Zone 2 (U Zone 3 (Ctr. Zone 4 (Ctr. Zone 5 (U Zone 6 (Rt INTERCHANGE Ratio E E ®®®®®®®®®®®® , \ \.PIMV ®'PAP ..IAP .. ��EM Partial Cloverleaf A MMM Partial Cloverleaf I M... I AV Displaced Left Turn Capacity Analysis for Planning of Junctions Northbrooke / Tarpon Bay PM Overall TYPE OF INTERSECTION V/C atio V/C Ranking Multimodal Score Pedestrian Accommodations Bicycle Accommodations Transit Accommodations Displaced Left Turn \�� DisplacedPartial \\\ Partial Displaced Left Turn E-W IIEN, 001, Poor Poor Fair Partial Median U-Turn N-S Fair Fair Poor Fair Fair Poor Fair Fair Poor Partial Median U-Turn E-W Fair Fair Poor Traffic Signal WOMEN Poor Poor Fair Signalized Restricted Crossing U- Fair Fair Poor Turn E-W Signalized Restricted Crossing U- Fair Fair Poor Turn N-S Northbrooke / Tarpon Bay PM Summary Report - Page 1 of 2 Project Name: Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study Project Number: D3191200 Location: Collier County, FL Date: September 4, 2020 Number of Intersection Legs: Major Street Direction East-West Volume— Traffic • Volume (Veh/hr) Percent (%) U-Turn Left Thru Right Heavy Vehicles Volume Growth Eastbound 14 364 3232 499 3.80% 2.00% Westbound 6 133 1684 21 5.38% 2.28% Southbound 0 193 91 225 2.75% 1.58% Northbound 0 490 197 176 1.25% 3.17% Adjustment Factor 0.80 0.95 0.85 0.80 0.95 0.85 Suggested Truck to PCE Factor Suggested = 2.00 2.00 FDOT Context Zone C4-General Urban Residential Critical Lane Volume Threshold 2-phase signal Suggested = 1800 1800 3-phase signal Suggested = 1750 1750 4-phase signal Suggested = 1700 1700 Summary Report - Page 2 of 2 TYPE OF INTERSECTION Displaced Left Turn Overall v/c Ratio 0.93 V/C Ranking 1 Multimodal Score 2.4 Pedestrian Bicycle Transit Accommodation Accommodation Accommodatio Poor Poor Fair Partial Displaced Left Turn N-S 1.00 2 2.4 Poor Poor Falr Partial Displaced Left Turn E-W 1.01 3 2.4 Poor Poor Fair Partial Median U-Turn N-S 1.11 4 3.1 Fair Fair Po Median U-Turn N-S 1.13 5 3.1 Fair Fair Poo Median U-Turn E-W 1.16 6 3.1 Fair Fair P00 Partial Median U-Turn E-W 1.20 7 3.1 Fair Fair Poo Traffic Signal 1.23 8 2.4 Poor Poor Fair SignalizeSignalizea Kestrictedrossing - 1 urn 1.26 9 3.1 11 Fair Fair Poor Igna ize es ric a rossing - urn 4.18 10 3.1 Fair Fair Poor Northbrooke / Tarpon Bay PM Project Name: Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Stud Project Number: D3191200 Location: Collier County, FL Date: September 4, 2020 Number of Intersection Legs: Major Street Direction: East-West Traffic Volume Demand Volume (Veh/hr) Percent (%) U-Turn 11 Left *1 Thru 1 Right f* Heavy Vehicles Volume Growth Eastbound 14 364 3232 499 3.80% 2.00% Westbound 6 133 1684 21 5.38% 2.28% Southbound 0 193 91 225 2.75% 1.58% Northbound 0 490 197 176 1.25% 3.17% Adjustment Factor0.80 Factor 0.95 0.85 0.80 0.95 T 0.85 Suggested Truck to PCE Factor Suggested = 2.00 2.00 FDOT Context Zone C4-General Urban Residential Critical Lane Volume Threshold 2-phase signal Suggested = 1800 1800 3-phase signal Suggested = 1750 1750 4-phase signal Suggested = 1700 1700 Northbrooke / Tarpon Bay PM Number of Lanes TYPE OF for Non -roundabout Intersections OQQQOQQQOQQ�OQQ� � I/QQQ I/QQQ I/Q©QII©©Q Two-Way Stop Control I/QQQ I/QQQ I/Q©QII©©Q ■�►'•7I/QQQ I/QQQ I/Q©QII©©Q � I/QQQ I/QQQ I/Q©QII©©Q Continuous Green T ®IIQQIIIIIIQQIIQIIQIIIIIIII ®IIIII/II II QII Q II QQII IIII ©Q ®IIIIQQIIQQIIIIIPAVPAV IQIIQ A/Q/QIII/I/IIIIQQI/QQII Quadrant RoadwayPartial ® I/QQa II I/QQa I/QQQ ®IIII Q� II QQQ II QQQ II QQQ �7I/QQQ I/QQQ I/Q0� III/00 Displaced -ft Turn ®I/QQQI/QQQI/Q©QII©©Q Q�7II/QQQ I/QQQ I/Q©QII ©©Q • I/QQQ I/QQQ I/QQQ I/QQQ ® QQQQQQQQ I/I/I/Q I/I/I/Q ■u7IIIIIIQIIIIII000QQQQQQ Unsignalized Restricted Crossing U-® Turn QQQQQQQQ I/I/I/Q I/I/I/Q IIIQIIIQQQQQQQQQ Median U-Turn ® Q I/QQQ I/QQ II II QQ I/ I/QQ ■u7 IIII QQ IIII QQQ I/ QQ© I/ QQ Partial Median U-Turn ® QII QQQI/QQ I/QQQ I/QQQ Qom■ I/QQQ I/QQQQ II ©QQ II ©Q Number of Lanes for Interchanges TYPE OF INTERCHANGE II/QQQ II/QQQ I/Q©QII©©Q Partial Cloverleaf A IIQI/QIIQI/QI/II©I/I/I/DII Partial Cloverleaf B ®I/Q®I/Q®I/QI/Q I/QI/Q I/QI/QI/QI/QI/Q©QII©QQ Displaced -ft Turn I/QQQI/Q®II®QPIVA Q II QQQ II QQQ II Q©QII ©QQ Diverging Diamond Interchange ®II®II®I/QI/QI/QI/Q I/QI/QII©I/QI/Q©QII©QQ I/Q®I/Q®I/Q©QII©©Q I/QQQ I/QQQ I/ Q©QII ©QQ Northbrooke / Tarpon Bay PM Results for Non -roundabout Intersections Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 4 Zone 5 ' Overall TYPE OF INTERSECTION mmmmm�mm� (North) (South) (West) (Center) v1c III Ratio �m mmmmmmmm E== Two -Way Stop Control All -Way Stop Control Continuous Green T ®mm mm pmmp_�Quadrant Roadway ® \ �..�� NEEPartial Displaced Left Turn Signalized Restricted Crossing U-Turn Unsignalized Restricted Crossing U-Turn Median U-Turn Partial Median U-Turn Northbrooke / Tarpon Bay PM Detailed Report - Page 4 of 4 Results for Interchanges Zone 1 Zone 2 (Lt Zone 3 Zone 4 Zone 5 (Lt Zone 6 Ratio E ®®®®® mom ��Fair Partial Cloverleaf A Partial Cloverleaf B WMEMEMENE", Displaced Left Turn Diverging Diamond Interchange ®mom M \ �UMN Northbrooke / Tarpon Bay PM Florida Department of Transportation Intersection Control Evaluation Form 750-010-30 Intersection Control Evaluation (ICE) Form Stage 1: Screening To fulfill the requirements of Stage 1 (Screening) of FDOT's ICE procedures, complete the following form and append all supporting documentation. Completed forms can be submitted to the District Traffic Operations Engineer (DTOE) and District Design Engineer (DDE) for the project's approval. Project Name Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study FDOT Project # Date 09/15/20 Submitted By Robert Grubel Agency/Companyl Jacobs Engineering, Inc. I Emaill Robert.Grubel@jacobs.com FDOT Context Classification I C4 - Urban General I FDOT Districtl District 1 1 Countyl Collier Project Locality (City/Town/Village) Collier County I Project Typel Corridor Improvement Project The 2018 AUIR projects the intersection of Livingston Road and Immokalee Road to be deficient by 2023 and Project Purpose (What Immokalee Road from I-75 to Logan Boulevard to be deficient by 2026. is the catalyst for this project and why is it being undertaken?) Project Setting Description The northwest corner contains a retention pond. The northeast corner contains residential development. (Describe the area surrounding the The southwest and southeast corners are vacant. intersection ) Sidewalk exists along the eastbound and multiuse path along the westbound direction on Immokalee Road. Multimodal Context Sidewalk exists along the northbound approach on Oakes Boulevard, north of the intersection, and on the (Describe the pedestrian, bicycle, and transit southbound approach, south of the intersection. There are no bike lane facilites on any of the approaches. activity in the area and the potential for Bus service travels along Immokalee Road however no stops are located at this intersection. activity based on surrounding land uses and development patterns ) Major Street Information Route #: CR 846 1 Route Name(s)l Immokalee Road I Milepost Existing Control Type Two-way Stop -Control Existing AADT1 53,600 Design Year AADT 1 75,200 Design Vehicle Interstate Semitrailer (WB-62) I Control Vehiciel Interstate Semitrailer (WB-62) Primary Functional Classification Urban Principal Arterial Design Speed (mph) 45 Secondary Functional Classification (if app.)i Target Speed (mph) [if app.] 45 Direction Eastbound Number of Lanes Study Period #1 Traffic Volumes Study Period #2 Traffic Volumes Sidewalks along One side of the approach Left -Turn 1 �* Crosswalk on Approach? No Left -Through 0 Weekday AM Peak Weekday PM Peak o On -Street Bike Facilities? No Through 3 Left 82 Left 41 Q Multi -Use Path? No Left -Through -Right 0 Through 2,467 Through 3,626 Scheduled Bus Service? Yes Through -Right 0 Right 105 Right 141 Bus Stop on Approach? No Right -Turn 1 Daily Truck % 7.3% Direction Westbound Number of Lanes Study Period #1 Traffic Volumes Study Period #2 Traffic Volumes Sidewalks along: One side of the approach Left -Turn 0 Crosswalk on Approach? No Left -Through 0 Weekday AM Peak Weekday PM Peak o On -Street Bike Facilities? No Through 3 Left Left Q Multi -Use Path? Yes Left -Through -Right 0 Through 4,138 Through 1,874 Scheduled Bus Service? Yes Through -Right 0 Right 195 Right 116 Bus Stop on Approach? No Right-Turril 1 Daily Truck %1 5.4% Oakes Blvd Page 1 of 4 FDOT ICE: Stage 1 Minor Street Information Route #: 1 Route Name(s)l Oakes Blvd Existing Control Type Two-way Stop -Control I Existing AADT Design Vehicle T Interstate Semitrailer (WB-62) I Control Vehicle Primary Functional Classificationi Urban Major Collector Secondary Functional Classification (if app.)i Urban Minor Arterial Direction Northbound Number of Lanes Sidewalks along: One side of the approach Left -Turn �* Crosswalk on Approach? Yes Left -Through o On -Street Bike Facilities? No Through CL Multi -Use Path? No Left -Through -Right Scheduled Bus Service? No Through -Right Bus Stop on Approach? No Right -Turn Direction Southbound Number of Lanes Sidewalks along: One side of the approach Left -Turn Crosswalk on Approach? No Left -Through o On -Street Bike Facilities? No Through Q Multi -Use Path? No Left -Through -Right Scheduled Bus Service? No Through -Right Bus Stop on Approach? No Right -Turn Direction Number of Lanes Sidewalks along: Left -Turn Crosswalk on Approach? Left -Through o On -Street Bike Facilities? Through Q Multi -Use Path? Left -Through -Right Scheduled Bus Service? I Through -Right Bus Stop on Approach? I Right -Turn Milepost (if app.) 4,400 Design Year AADTJ 8,700 Interstate Semitrailer (WB-62) Design Speed (mph) 30 Target Speed (mph) [if app.] 30 Study Period #1 Traffic Study Period #2 Traffic Volumes I Volumes Weekday AM Peak Left Through Right 132 Daily Truck % Weekday PM Peak Through Right 5.3% Study Period #1 Traffic I Study Period #2 Traffic es VolumVolumes Weekday AM Peak Left Through Right 2 Daily Truck % Study Period #1 Traffic Volumes Weekday AM Peak Left Through Right Daily Truck % Weekday PM Peak Through Rightl 34 0.0% Study Period #2 Traffic Volumes Weekday PM Peak Th Rig Crash History (Existing Intersections Only) Append the most recent five -years of crash data for the intersection from the CAR System. If the crash data evidences any issues relating to safety performance, discuss briefly here: Within the last five years (2014-2018), there were approximatley 87 crashes reported, 35 of which were not reported short form. None were fatal or causing major injury. Excluding short form crash reports, the crash severity included 0- Fatal, 0- Major Injury, 4-Minor Injury, 5-Possible Injury, and 26-Property Damage. The 35 crash types are broken down by: 2-Angle, 3-Hit Fixed Object, 3-Left Turn, 0-Pedestrian, 22-Rear End, 1-Right Turn, 3-Sideswipe, and 1- Unknown. Oakes Blvd Page 2 of 4 FDOT ICE: Stage 1 Control Strategy Evaluation Provide a brief justification as to why each of the following control strategies should be advanced or not. Justification should consider potential environmental impacts. CAP-X Outputs V/C Ratio Justification Weekday AM Weekday PM Multimodal SPICE Strategy to Be Control Strategy Peak Peak Score Ranking Advanced? Two -Way Stop- 19.50 6.20 1.90 9 No Controlled Existing Two -Way Stop Control All -Way Stop 4.34 3.61 3.3 Yes Controlled Signalized 1.02 1.04 2.4 5 Yes Control Roundabout 2.07 5.62 2.8 8 Yes Median U-Turn 0.93 0.90 3.1 2 Yes RCUT 0.88 0.89 3.1 11 Yes (Signalized) High v/c ratio compared to alternatives. RCUT 20.03 141.59 2.2 No (Unsignalized) Jughandle 3 Yes Displaced Left- 0.92 0.89 2.4 4 Yes Turn Existing 4-Leg Intersection Continuous N/A N/A N/A N/A No Green Tee Quadrant 1.34 1.24 2.2 Yes Roadway Partial MUT 1.38 0.92 3.1 Yes Partial Displaced 0.95 0.91 2.4 Yes Left Turn Oakes Blvd Page 3 of 4 FDOT ICE: Stage 1 Resolution To be filled out by FDOT District Traffic Operations Engineer and District Design Engineer Project Determination Multiple Viable Alternatives Identified: Continue to Stage 2 Comments DTOE Name Signature Date DDE Name Signature Date Oakes Blvd Page 4 of 4 Input Worksheet 1 Project Name: Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Stud Project Number: D3191200 Location Collier County, FL Date September 4, 2020 Number of Intersection Legs Major Street Direction East-West VolumeTraffic • Volume (Veh/hr) Percent (%) U-Turn Left Thru Right Heavy Vehicles Volume Growth Eastbound 18 64 2467 105 10.61 % 2.28% 0 0 4138 195 5.51 % 2.28% 0 0 0 2 0.00% 1.93% 0 0 0 132 8.70% 3.86% Westbound Southbound Northbound Adjustment Factor 0.80 0.95 0.85 Suggested 0.80 0.95 0.85 Truck to PCE Factor Suggested = 2.00 2.00 FDOT Context Zone C4-General Urban Residential Critical Lane Volume Threshold 2-phase signal Suggested = 1800 1800 3-phase signal Suggested = 1750 1750 4-phase signal Suggested = 1700 1700 Equivalent•Volume Volume (Veh/hr) U-Turn Left Thru Right Eastbound 20 0 0 0 72 2791 119 4466 210 0 2 0 149 Westbound 0 Southbound 0 Northbound 0 Left -Turn Adjustment Factoi Conversion of left -turning vehicles to equivalent through vehicles Right -turn Adjustment Factoi Conversion of right -turning vehicles to equivalent through vehicles U-turn Adjustment Factoi Conversion of U-turning vehicles to equivalent through vehicles Truck to PCE Factor 1 truck = X Passenger Car Equivalents Critical Lane Volume Sum Limi Saturation Value for Critical Lane Volume Sum at an intersection Capacity Analysis for Planning of Junctions Oakes AM Capacity. • of • Step 2A: Base Conditions Analysis Traffic Signal Number of Lanes for Existing Configuration (Can be edited in "3- Alt Nurn Lanes input" as needed) Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound TYPE OF INTERSECTION Sheet U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R Traffic Signal FULL 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 4 1 0 4 1 Results for Existing Configuration TYPE OF Zone 1 (North) Zone 2 (south) Zone 3 (East) INTERSECTION Sheet CLV VIC CLV VIC CLV VIC Zone 4 (west) zones (center) CLV VIC CLV VIC Traffic Signal FULL -- -- -- -- k Existing Configuration Results Overall v/c Pedestrian Bicycle a Poor Ratio Accommodation Accommodation Transit Poor Fair Accommodation Step 2B: Alternative Selection Rankings Inclusion Yes/No Comment Continue to Step 3 Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study Project Name: D3191200 Project Number: Collier County, FL Location: September 4, 2020 Date: Major Street East-West Direction At -Grade Non -Roundabout Intersections? Yes Traffic Signal Yes Two -Way Stop Control Yes All -Way Stop Control Yes Continuous Green T No 4 Leg Intersection Quadrant Roadway S-W No Vacant Present in Quadrant N-E No Residential Present in Quadrant S-E Yes Vacant Present in Quadrant N-W No Retention Pond in Quadrant Partial Displaced Left Turn Yes Displaced Left Turn Yes Signalized Restricted Crossing U-Turn Yes Unsignalized Restricted Crossing U-Turn Yes Median U-Turn Yes Partial Median U-Turn Yes Roundabouts? Yes 50 ICD Miniroundabout No 75 CD Miniroundaobut No 1x1 No 1 NS x 2EW No 2NS x 1EW No 2x2 Yes Grade Separated Interchanges? No Diamond Partial Cloverleaf A Partial Cloverleaf B Displaced Left Turn Interchange Diverging Diamond Interchange Single Point Oakes AM Input Worksheet 2 Input Worksheet 2 Collier County, FL Number of Lanes for Non -roundabout Intersections ®00000000OQOO �� ®IIIIIIIIIIMIIOIIO©IIIIOBE ®00000000 0000 0M00 ® FAMINE 1210III/ I/10am 12m©II Qu.dnmt Roadway ®O000O000Oo©o0man •-- • ®��00 ��0000000000 ®000000000�©0 ��©0 '• ®��0��0�00000000 ®000000000�©0 ��©0 ®000�000000©0 ��©� ®O man O000aO©oo0©0 Input Worksheet 2 Number TYPE OF INTERCHANGE of Lanes for Interchanges 0000000000©0OO©0 ®0000000000000000 ®0o0o0o0000©000©O ®� 000 0000 OOOO O�OO Di.pl.ced Left Turn ®0000000000©0OO©0 ® � 000 0000 OO©0 � 0©0 ®��00 0�00 OOOO OOOO Immokelee Road Corridor Congestion Study Collier County, FL Volume Echo with Shared Lane Adjustment for Non -roundabout Intersections ® II00m II00© II MGM= IIO=m ®PIVA0' 0' =PIVA0' 0' ©P ®WMPIVA0' = ®PIVA0' 0' PIVA0' n ©PAV ®MMM PIVA0' ®' ��0' 0' ©�®��0' M®�00��W Continuous Green T 0©�m��10 ®� M M PIVA 0M© PIVA mamPIVA PIVA M n 0' 0' ©PIVA®EMMPIVAIV M PIVA ®am0 �PIVA Q M PIVA®PIVA0n PIVAn ©PIVA®EMM PIVA0 Im ® 12- IN IN 0 12- IN IN© a000 000M Capacity Analysis for Planning of Junctions Oakes AM Capacity Analysis for Planning of Junctions Oakes AM Results Worksheet TYPE OF I Zone 1 (North) I Zone 3 (East) I Zone 2 (South) I Zone DABOUT ROUN Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 Lane 1 L 501CD 0.00 -0.08 751CD 0.00 1 X 1 0.14 1 NS X 2EW 0.07 2NS X 1EW 0.00 0.07 0.00 2 X 2 0.00 0.07 0.00 Overall \\\\\\ \ ®®® '� Results for Interchanges TYPE•(Ctr Zone 4 Overall INTERCHANGE Ratio E E ®®®®®®®®®®®® 10 ®®®®.Ivalum, C... .C... CloverleafPartial ..0 ..0 ONMWE CloverleafPartial -... .. �W �=.. Displaced Left Turn i,�\ n"'M Diverging Diamond I Interchange 0 M �\ 7\7`711 \IV2! 1 111 40"N"' w N PAV PAV MPAV ,�� P i7 IT Capacity Analysis for Planning of Junctions Oakes AM Median U-Turn N-S Fair Fair Poor N Fair Fair Poor Partial Displaced Left Turn N-S �,,. 5 2.4 Poor P Fair Partial Displaced Left Turn E-W \ ` 5 2.4 Poor Poor Fair Partial Median U-Turn N-S 7 3.1 Fair Fair Poor Traffic Signal>_ 8 2.4 Poor Poor Fair Partial Median U-Turn E-W 9 3.1 Fair Fair Poor Quadrant Roadway S-E \ \ 10 2.2 Poor Poor Poor Oakes AM Summary Report - Page 1 of 2 Project Name: Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study Project Number: D3191200 Location: Collier County, FL Date: September 4, 2020 Number of Intersection Legs: Major Street Direction East-West Volume— Traffic • Volume (Veh/hr) Percent (%) U-Turn Left Thru Right Heavy Vehicles Volume Growth Eastbound 18 64 2467 105 10.61 % 2.28% Westbound 0 0 4138 195 5.51 % 2.28% Southbound 0 0 0 2 0.00% 1.93% Northbound 0 0 0 132 8.70% 3.86% Adjustment Factor 0.80 0.95 0.85 0.80 0.95 0.85 Suggested Truck to PCE Factor Suggested = 2.00 2.00 FDOT Context Zone C4-General Urban Residential Critical Lane Volume Threshold 2-phase signal Suggested = 1800 1800 3-phase signal Suggested = 1750 1750 4-phase signal Suggested = 1700 1700 Summary Report - Page 2 of 2 in, Icieu Crossing u I urn 0.88 1 3.1 Fair Fair Poor Displaced Left Turn 0.92 2 2.4 Poor Poor Fair Median U-Turn N-S 0.92 2 3.1 Fair Fair Poor Median U-Turn E-W 0.93 4 3.1 Fair Fair Poor Partial Displaced Left Turn N-S 0.95 5 2.4 Poor Poor Fair Partial Displaced Left Turn E-W 0.95 5 2.4 Poor Poor Fair Partial Median U-Turn N-S 1.01 7 3.1 Fair Fair Poor Traffic Signal 1.02 8 2.4 Poor Poor Fair Partial Median U-Turn E-W 1.38 9 3.1 Fair Fair Poor Quadrant Roadway S-E 1.44 10 2.2 Poor Poor Poor Oakes AM Project Name: Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Stud Project Number: D3191200 Location: Collier County, FL Date: September 4, 2020 Number of Intersection Legs: Major Street Direction: East-West Traffic Volume Demand Volume (Veh/hr) Percent (%) U-Turn 11 Left *1 Thru 1 Right f* Heavy Vehicles Volume Growth Eastbound 18 64 2467 105 10.61% 2.28% Westbound 0 0 4138 195 5.51% 2.28% Southbound 0 0 0 2 0.00% 1.93% Northbound 0 0 0 132 8.70% 3.86% Adjustment Factor0.80 Factor 0.95 0.85 0.80 0.95 T 0.85 Suggested Truck to PCE Factor Suggested = 2.00 2.00 FDOT Context Zone C4-General Urban Residential Critical Lane Volume Threshold 2-phase signal Suggested = 1800 1800 3-phase signal Suggested = 1750 1750 4-phase signal Suggested = 1700 1700 Oakes AM Number of Lanes TYPE OF for Non -roundabout Intersections OQQQOQQQOQQ�OQQ� � I/QQQ II/QQQ II/QQQ II/QQQ Two-Way Stop Control I/QQQ I/QQQ I/Q©Q I/Q©Q ■�7I/QQQ I/QQQ I/Q©Q I/Q©Q � I/QQQ I/QQQ I/Q©Q I/Q©Q Continuous Green T ®IIQQIIIIIIQQIIQIIQIIIIIIII ®IIIII/II II QI/ Q II QQII IIII ©Q ®IIIIQQIIQQIIIIIPAVPAV IQIIQ A/Q/QIII/I/IIIIQQI/QQII Quadrant RoadwayPartial ® I/QQa II I/QQa I/QQQ ®IIII Q� II QQQ II QQQ II QQQ �7I/QQQ I/QQQ I/Q0� III/00 Displaced Left Turn Q�7II/QQQ I/QQQ I/Q©Q I/Q©Q • EWE I/QQQ I/QQQ I/QQQ I/QQQ ® QQQQQQQQ I/I/I/Q I/I/I/Q ■u7IIIIIIQIIIIII000QQQQQQ Unsignalized Restricted Crossing U-® Turn QQQQQQQa I/I/I/Q I/I/I/Q IIIQIIIQQQQQQQQQ Median U-Turn ® Q I/QQQ I/QQ II II QQ I/ I/QQ ■u7 IIII QQ IIII QQQ I/ QQQ I/ QQ Partial Median U-Turn ® QI/QQQI/QQ I/QQQ I/QQQ Qom■ I/QQQ I/QQQQ II ©QQ II ©Q Number of Lanes for Interchanges TYPE OF INTERCHANGE . ��QQQ�QQQ�Q©QQQ©Q II/QQQ II/QQQ I/Q©Q I/Q©Q Partial Cloverleaf A IIQI/QIIQI/QI/II©I/I/I/DII Partial Cloverleaf B ®I/Q®I/Q®I/QI/Q I/QI/Q I/ W I/Q II W I/Q I/QQQ I/QQQ Displaced -ft Turn I/QQQI/Q®II®QPIVA Q II QQQ II QQQ II QQQ II QQQ Diverging Diamond Interchange ®II�II�I/QI/QI/QI/Q I/Q I/Q I/Q I/Q I/QQQ I/QQQ I/Q® I/Q® I/QQQ I/QQQ I/QQQ I/QQQ I/Q©Q I/Q©Q Oakes AM Results for Non -roundabout Intersections TYPE OF INTERSECTION Zone 1 (North) Zone 2 (South) Zone 4 Zone 5 (West) ' (Center) Overall v1c Ratio �m Two -Way Stop Control All -Way Stop Control \rti�\ \�� Continuous Green T I \WINNINNOWEEMEM � ��Quadrant Roadway 1110MENNOWNIEN Signalized Restricted Crossing U-Turn Unsignalized Restricted Crossing U-Turn Oakes AM Detailed Report - Page 4 of 4 Results for Interchanges Zone 1 Zone 2 (Lt Zone 3 Zone 4 Zone 5 (Lt Zone 6 Ratio E ®®®®®®®®®®®® SWENNON WEEP! Partial Cloverleaf A Partial Cloverleaf B Displaced Left Turn ® ®� N\QQ\\ ,,, \ ,,, ,,.125 �p�p�r�� ®® ® Diverging Diamond 000 Interchange 1106 140 NB��\ Oakes AM Input Worksheet 1 Project Name: Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Stud Project Number: D3191200 Location Collier County, FL Date September 4, 2020 Number of Intersection Legs Major Street Direction East-West VolumeTraffic • Volume (Veh/hr) Percent (%) U-Turn Left Thru Right Heavy Vehicles Volume Growth Eastbound 2 39 3626 141 3.99% 2.28% 0 0 1874 116 5.31% 2.28% 0 0 0 34 0.00% 1.93% 0 0 0 250 1.84% 3.86% Westbound Southbound Northbound Adjustment Factor 0.80 0.95 0.85 0.80 0.95 0.85 Suggested Truck to PCE Factor Suggested = 2.00 2.00 FDOT Context Zone C4-General Urban Residential Critical Lane Volume Threshold 2-phase signal Suggested = 1800 1800 3-phase signal Suggested = 1750 1750 4-phase signal Suggested = 1700 1700 Equivalent•Volume Volume (Veh/hr) U-Turn I q Left 11 Thru Right r+ Eastbound 2 0 0 0 41 - 3857 150 2019 125 0 35 Westbound 0 Southbound 0 Northbound 0 0 264 Left -Turn Adjustment Factoi Conversion of left -turning vehicles to equivalent through vehicles Right -turn Adjustment Factoi Conversion of right -turning vehicles to equivalent through vehicles U-turn Adjustment Factoi Conversion of U-turning vehicles to equivalent through vehicles Truck to PCE Factor 1 truck = X Passenger Car Equivalents Critical Lane Volume Sum Limi Saturation Value for Critical Lane Volume Sum at an intersection Capacity Analysis for Planning of Junctions Oakes PM Capacity. • of • Step 2A: Base Conditions Analysis Traffic Signal Number of Lanes for Existing Configuration (Can be edited in "3- Alt Nurn Lanes input" as needed) Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound TYPE OF INTERSECTION Sheet U L T R U L T R U L T R U L T R Traffic Signal FULL 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 3 1 0 3 1 Results for Existing Configuration TYPE OF Zone 1 (North) Zone 2 (south) Zone 3 (East) INTERSECTION Sheet CLV VIC CLV VIC CLV VIC Zone a (west) zones (center) CLV VIC CLV VIC Traffic Signal FULL -- -- -- -- 9 • Existing Configuration Results Overall v/c Pedestrian Bicycle a• Poor Ratio Accommodation Accommodation Transit Poor Fair Accommodation Step 2B: Alternative Selection Rankings Inclusion Yes/No Comment Continue to Step 3 Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study Project Name: D3191200 Project Number: Collier County, FL Location: September 4, 2020 Date: Major Street East-West Direction At -Grade Non -Roundabout Intersections? Yes Traffic Signal Yes Two -Way Stop Control Yes All -Way Stop Control No Two Way Stop Control Continuous Green T No 4 Leg Intersection Quadrant Roadway S-W No Vacant Present in Quadrant WE No Residential Present in Quadrant S-E No Vacant Present in Quadrant N-W No Retention Pond in Quadrant Partial Displaced Left Turn Yes Displaced Left Turn Yes Signalized Restricted Crossing U-Turn Yes Unsignalized Restricted Crossing U-Turn Yes Median U-Turn Yes Partial Median U-Turn Yes Roundabouts? Yes 50 CD Miniroundabout No 75 ICD Miniroundaobut No 1x1 No 1 NS x 2EW No 2NS x 1EW No 2x2 Yes Grade Separated Interchanges? No Diamond Partial Cloverleaf A Partial Cloverleaf B Displaced Left Turn Interchange Diverging Diamond Interchange Single Point Oakes PM Input Worksheet 2 Input Worksheet 2 Collier Coumty, FL Number of Lanes for Non -roundabout Intersections Continuous Green T Qu.dr.nt Roadway Input Worksheet 2 Number TYPE OF INTERCHANGE of Lanes for Interchanges �000 �000 �0©0 �0©0 Di.pl.ced Left Turn Immokelee Road Corridor Congestion Study Collier Coctnty, FL Volume Echo with Shared Lane Adjustment for Non -roundabout Intersections ® OOOm II00m IlMEMO IIOomm ®000mO00®II MEMO IIOomm ® i000m loon® iomEMm i000mm ® i000m loon® iomEMm ioomm Continuous Green T® ®PIAV00pAv PIAVW 0®PIAVmWOPIAVWWRAV PIVAMMPIVA IvAOmm PIVAmEMPIVA IvAmmn ®PIVAn QmIvA 00�PIVAMM�PIVA 0nn ®IvAOPIVAmRVARVARAVISRUPEE IvA0MPIVA ®Oo0m000®O MEMO OOmm ® RVARAV no IvA00® RVAmEMO IvA0' mm ®IvAOOmIvA00wRUPEE IvAQm® ®IvAn mIvA 0' ®PIVAMEM PIVARVAM® ®PIAVOOm PIAV QQ®PIAV MEMO IvA Qm® ®IvAnnoIvA 0' ®PIVAMEM IvAOmm ®INININ m INININ ®OmEZ000M® ®©0EM000M® ®0 10Om0 PIAV0®PIAV PAVEMO10PIVAM® ®RVARVA Om �� 0®©�EMO0 �M® ®O�nonP 0' m PIAV MEMO PIAV 0m® ®I/o0mI/00®©IIEMmOIIM® Capacity Analysis for Planning of Junctions Oakes PM Capacity Analysis for Planning of Junctions Oakes PM Results Worksheet Results for Interchanges TYPE OF Zone 1 (Rt Zone 2 (U Zone 3 (Ctr. Zone 4 (Ctr. Zone 5 (U Zone 6 (Rt INTERCHANGE Ratio E E ®®®®®®®®®®®® �®pC..NAV >>u� .. �� MMM _ Cloverleaf A CloverleafPartial Partial :'A ®®®....� Left Turn placed : ,, ��M MMM m „ o ,,, m „ Diverging ...., Interchange®-- - - MV I AV P Capacity Analysis for Planning of Junctions Oakes PM Overall TYPE OF INTERSECTION V/C V/C Ranking Multimodal Score Pedestrian Accommodations Bicycle Accommodations Transit Accommodations Ratio Partial Displaced Left Turn N-S Poor Displaced0001101 Signalized Restricted Crossing U- \� Fair Fair Poor Turn E-W Median U-Turn N-S Fair Fair Poor Median U-Turn E-W \\\\\ Fair Fair Poor Partial Displaced Left Turn E-W \\\\ Poor or Poor Fair Partial Median U-Turn N-S �\ \0\0 Fair Fair Poor Partial Median U-Turn E-W \\ �3EON Fair Fair Poor Poor Fair Oakes PM Summary Report - Page 1 of 2 Project Name: Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study Project Number: D3191200 Location: Collier County, FL Date: September 4, 2020 Number of Intersection Legs: Major Street Direction East-West Volume— Traffic • Volume (Veh/hr) Percent (%) U-Turn Left Thru Right Heavy Vehicles Volume Growth Eastbound 2 39 3626 141 3.99% 2.28% Westbound 0 0 1874 116 5.31 % 2.28% Southbound 0 0 0 34 0.00% 1.93% Northbound 0 0 0 250 1.84% 3.86% Adjustment Factor 0.80 0.95 0.85 0.80 0.95 0.85 Suggested Truck to PCE Factor Suggested = 2.00 2.00 FDOT Context Zone C4-General Urban Residential Critical Lane Volume Threshold 2-phase signal Suggested = 1800 1800 3-phase signal Suggested = 1750 1750 4-phase signal Suggested = 1700 1700 Summary Report - Page 2 of 2 Partial Displaced Left Turn N-S • 0.70 1 .. 2.4 Poor Poor Felr Displaced Left Turn 0.89 2 2.4 Poor Poor Fair SignalizeSignalizea Kestrictedrossing - 1 urn 0.89 2 3.1 Fair Fair Median U-Turn N-S 0.89 2 3.1 Fair Fair Poo Median U-Turn E-W 0.90 5 3.1 Fair Fair Poor Partial Displaced Left Turn E-W 0.91 6 2.4 Poor Poor Fair Partial Median U-Turn N-S 0.91 6 3.1 Fair Fair Poor Partial Median U-Turn E-W 0.92 8 3.1 Fair Fair Poor Traffic Signal 1.04 9 2.4 Poor Poor Fair bignalizea Kestrictedrossing - 1 urn 4.09 10 3.1 Fair Fair Poor Oakes PM Project Name: Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Stud Project Number: D3191200 Location: Collier County, FL Date: September 4, 2020 Number of Intersection Legs: Major Street Direction: East-West Traffic Volume Demand Volume (Veh/hr) Percent (%) U-Turn 11 Left *1 Thru 1 Right f* Heavy Vehicles Volume Growth Eastbound 2 39 3626 141 3.99% 2.28% Westbound 0 0 1874 116 5.31% 2.28% Southbound 0 0 0 34 0.00% 1.93% Northbound 0 0 0 250 1.84% 3.86% Adjustment Factor0.80 Factor 0.95 0.85 0.80 0.95 0.85 Suggested Truck to PCE Factor Suggested = 2.00 2.00 MOT Context Zone C4-General Urban Residential Critical Lane Volume T Threshold 2-phase signal Suggested = 1800 1800 ih 3-phase signal p g Suggested = 1750 Su 1750 4-phase signal Suggested = 1700 1700 Oakes PM Number of Lanes TYPE OF for Non -roundabout Intersections OQQQOQQQOQQ�OQQ� � I/QQQ II/QQQ I/Q©Q I/Q©Q Two-Way Stop Control I/QQQ I/QQQ I/Q©Q I/Q©Q ■�7I/QQQ I/QQQ I/Q©Q I/Q©Q � I/QQQ I/QQQ I/Q©Q I/Q©Q Continuous Green T ®IIQQIIIIIIQQIIQIIQIIIIIIII ®IIIII/II II QI/ Q II QQII IIII ©Q ®IIIIQQIIQQIIIIIPAVPAV IQIIQ A/Q/QIII/I/IIIIQQI/QQII Quadrant RoadwayPartial ® I/QQa II I/QQa I/QQQ ®IIII Q� II QQQ II QQQ II QQQ �7I/QQQ I/QQQ I/Q0� III/QD Displaced Left Turn ®II/QQQ I/QQQ I/QQQ I/QQQ Q�7II/QQQ I/QQQ I/Q©Q I/Q©Q • EWE I/QQQ I/QQQ I/QQQ I/QQQ ® QQQQQQQQ I/I/I/Q I/I/I/Q ■ u7IVAPAV IIIIIIQQQQQQQQQ Unsignalized Restricted Crossing U-® Turn QQQQQQQa I/I/I/Q I/I/I/Q IIIQIIIQQQQQQQQQ Median U-Turn ® Q I/QQQ I/QQ II II QQ I/ I/QQ ■ w7I/I/QQI/I/000II©QQII©Q Partial Median U-Turn ® QI/QQQI/QQ I/QQQ I/QQQ Qom■ I/QQQ I/QQQQ II ©QQ II ©Q Number of Lanes for Interchanges TYPE OF INTERCHANGE . ��QQQ�QQQ�Q©QQQ©Q II/QQQ II/QQQ I/Q©Q I/Q©Q Partial Cloverleaf A IIQI/QIIQI/QI/II©I/I/I/DII Partial Cloverleaf B ®I/Q®I/Q®I/QI/Q I/QI/Q I/ W I/Q II W I/Q I/QQQ I/QQQ Displaced -ft Turn I/QQQI/Q®II®QPIVA Q II QQQ II QQQ II QQQ II QQQ Diverging Diamond Interchange ®II�II�I/QI/QI/QI/Q I/Q I/Q I/Q I/Q I/QQQ I/QQQ Emu I/Q®I/Q®I/Q©QI/Q©Q /QQQ I/QQQ I/Q©Q I/Q©Q Oakes PM Results for Non -roundabout Intersections TYPE OF INTERSECTION mmmmm�mm� Zone 1 (North) Zone 2 (South) Zone 4 Zone 5 (West) ' (Center) Overall v1c Ratio IIITwo-Way �m Stop Control mmmmmmmm� E== �� s\'Continuous IN W Green T ®mmmm pmmp_�� N ME�� Roadway ®Quadrant �� Partial Displaced Left Turn 0g \\ �EE�\ \ � Left Turn Signalized Restricted Crossing U-Turn MENOMINEE�� ® \Displaced Unsignalized Restricted Crossing U-Turn ®\7 Median U-Turn Partial Median U.-Turn INEENE Oakes PM Capacity• • of • Detailed Report - Page 4 of 4 Results for Roundabouts c o 0 0 Zone 1 (North) Zone 3 (East) Zone 2 (South) Zone 4 (West) A v 2 v - v TYPE OF Overall v/c , 0 0 c o ROUNDABOUT Ratio d E o E E m E m E E 0 0 L Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 501CD -0.04 -0.09 Fair Fair Fair 751CD -0.04 -0.11 Fair Fair Fair 1 X 1 0.20 Fair Fair Fair o0 1 NS X 2EW 1 0.15 Poor Fair Fair 2NS X 1 EW Poor Fair Fair 0.00 0.15 0.00 2 X 2 4 : ' Poor Falr Falr 0.00 0.15 0.00 Results for Interchanges N N C C O O N 0 O Zone 1 Zone 2 (Lt Zone 3 Zone 4 Zone 5 (Lt Zone 6 TYPE OF INTERCHANGE Sheet (Rt Mrg) Mrg) (Ctr. 1) (Ctr. 2) Mrg) (Rt Mrg) Overall v/c a o 1 o o Ratio d E o f d E m E i E E 0. f01 0 U U U CLV V/C CLV V/C CLV V/C CLV V/C CLV V/C CLV V/C a a U a N-S 749 0.43 Poor Poor Fair Diamond E-W Poor Poor Fair N-S 0 0.00 43 0.02 .. Poor Poor Fair Partial Cloverleaf A E-W 1299 0.72 673 0.37 Poor Fair Poor N-S 0 0.00 0 0.00 Poor Poor Fair Partial Cloverleaf B11 E-W 1327 0.74 716 0.40 a Poor Poor Fair N-S 173 0.10 on a MIE 158 0.09 Poor Poor Fair Displaced Left Turn E-W 716 0.40 1286 0.71 1286 0.71 Poor Poor Fair 46 0.03 158 0.09 a Fair Fair Fair Diverging Diamond N_S 173 0.10 0 0.00 41 0.02 0 0.00 E-W 714 0.40 a 1299 0.72 673 Fair Fair Fair Interchange 0.37 176 0.f0 Poor Poor Fair N-S 188 0.10 43 0.03 Single Point E-W 714 0.40 Poor Poor Fair Oakes PM Florida Department of Transportation Intersection Control Evaluation Form 750-010-30 Intersection Control Evaluation (ICE) Form Stage 1: Screening To fulfill the requirements of Stage 1 (Screening) of FDOT's ICE procedures, complete the following form and append all supporting documentation. Completed forms can be submitted to the District Traffic Operations Engineer (DTOE) and District Design Engineer (DDE) for the project's approval. Project Name Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study FDOT Project # Date 09/15/20 Submitted By Robert Grubel Agency/Companyl Jacobs Engineering, Inc. I Emaill Robert.Grubel@jacobs.com FDOT Context Classification I C4 - Urban General I FDOT Districtl District 1 1 Countyl Collier Project Locality (City/Town/Village) Collier County I Project Typel Corridor Improvement Project The 2018 AUIR projects the intersection of Livingston Road and Immokalee Road to be deficient by 2023 and Project Purpose (What Immokalee Road from I-75 to Logan Boulevard to be deficient by 2026. is the catalyst for this project and why is it being undertaken?) Project Setting Description The northwest corner is residential. The northeast corner contains a school and offices. The southwest (Describe the area surrounding the corner contains a church. The southeast corner contains is vacant. intersection ) Sidewalk exists along the eastbound direction and multiuse path along the westbound approach of Multimodal Context Immokalee Road. Sidewalk runs southbound along Valewood Drive to the north of the intersection and runs (Describe the pedestrian, bicycle, and transit northbound to the south of the intersection. There are no bike lane facilites on any of the approaches. Bus activity in the area and the potential for service travels along Immokalee Road however no stops are located at this intersection. activity based on surrounding land uses and development patterns ) Major Street Information Route #: CR 846 1 Route Name(s)l Immokalee Road Milepost Existing Control Type Signal Existing AADT 53,600 Design Year AADT 75,200 Design Vehicle Interstate Semitrailer (WB-62) Control Vehicle Interstate Semitrailer (WB-62) Primary Functional Classification Urban Principal Arterial Design Speed (mph) 45 Secondary Functional Classification (if app.)i Target Speed (mph) [if app.] 45 Direction Eastbound Number of Lanes Study Period #1 Traffic Volumes Study Period #2 Traffic Volumes Sidewalks along One side of the approach Left -Turn 1 �* Crosswalk on Approach? No Left -Through 0 Weekday AM Peak Weekday PM Peak o On -Street Bike Facilities? No Through 3 Left 370 Left 336 Q Multi -Use Path. Yes Left -Through -Right 0 Through 2,177 Through 3,511 Scheduled Bus Service? Yes Through-Rightl 0 Right 2 Right 13 Bus Stop on Approach? No Right-Turril 1 Daily Truck % 7.3% Direction Westbound Number of Lanes Study Period #1 Traffic Volumes Study Period #2 Traffic Volumes Sidewalks along: One side of the approach Left -Turn 1 Crosswalk on Approach? Yes Left -Through 0 Weekday AM Peak Weekday PM Peak o On -Street Bike Facilities? No Through 3 Left 78 Left 58 Q Multi -Use Path? No Left -Through -Right 0 Through 3,884 Through 1,584 Scheduled Bus Service? Yes Through -Right 0 Right 32 Right 7 Bus Stop on Approach? No Right -Turn 1 Daily Truck % 6.0% Valewood Dr Page 1 of 4 FDOT ICE: Stage 1 Minor Street Information Route #: 1 Route Name(s)l Valewood Dr Milepost (if app.) Existing Control Typel Signal I Existing AADTJ 500 1 Design Year AADTJ 900 Design Vehicle I Interstate Semitrailer (WB-62) I Control Vehiclel Interstate Semitrailer (WB-62) Primary Functional Classificationi Urban Major Collector Design Speed (mph) 30 Secondary Functional Classification (if app.)i Urban Minor Arterial Target Speed (mph) [if app.] 30 Direction Northbound Number of Lanes Study Period #1 Traffic Volumes Study Period #2 Traffic Volumes Sidewalks along: One side of the approach Left -Turn 1 �* Crosswalk on Approach? No Left -Through 0 Weekday AM Peak Weekday PM Peak o On -Street Bike Facilities? No Through 0 Left 58 Left 71 Multi -Use Path. No Left -Through -Right 0 Through 96 Through 197 Scheduled Bus Service? No Through -Right 1 Right 19 Right 49 Bus Stop on Approach? No Right-Tuml 0 Daily Truck % 4.6% Direction Southbound Number of Lanes Study Period #1 Traffic Volumes Study Period #2 Traffic Volumes Sidewalks along: Both sides of the approach Left -Turn 0 Crosswalk on Approach? Yes Left -Through 1 Weekday AM Peak Weekday PM Peak o On -Street Bike Facilities? No Through 0 Left 105 Left 160 Q Multi -Use Path? No Left -Through -Right 0 Through 52 Through 98 Scheduled Bus Service? No Through -Right 0 Right 405 Right 286 Bus Stop on Approach? No Right-Tuml 1 Daily Truck % 3.7% Direction Number of Lanes Study Period #1 Traffic Volumes Study Period #2 Traffic Volumes Sidewalks along: Left -Turn Crosswalk on Approach? Left -Through Weekday AM Peak Weekday PM Peak o On -Street Bike Facilities? Through Left Left Q Multi -Use Path? Left -Through -Right Through Through Scheduled Bus Service? Through -Right Right Right Bus Stop on Approach? Right -Turn Daily Truck 11 Crash History (Existing Intersections Only) 11 Ippend the most recent five -years of crash data for the intersection from the CAR System. If the crash data evidences any issues relating to safety 1IIerformance, discuss briefly here: Within the last five years (2014-2018), there were approximatley 89 crashes reported, 46 of which were not reported short form. 1 causing major injury on a left turn. Excluding short form crash reports, the crash severity included 0- Fatal, 1- Major Injury, 3-Minor Injury, 11-Possible Injury, and 28-Property Damage. The 35 crash types are broken down by: 2-Angle, 3-Hit Fixed Object, 3-Left Turn, 0-Pedestrian, 22-Rear End, 1-Right Turn, 3-Sideswipe, and 1- Unknown. Valewood Dr Page 2 of 4 FDOT ICE: Stage 1 Control Strategy Evaluation Provide a brief justification as to why each of the following control strategies should be advanced or not. Justification should consider potential environmental impacts. CAP-X Outputs V/C Ratio Justification Weekday AM Weekday PM Multimodal SPICE Strategy to Be Control Strategy Peak Peak Score Ranking Advanced? Currently a signalized intersection. Two -Way Stop- N/A N/A N/A N/A No Controlled Currently a signalized intersection. All -Way Stop N/A N/A N/A N/A No Controlled Signalized 1.19 1.07 2.4 4 Yes Control Roundabout 13.45 6.48 2.8 7 No Median U-Turn 1.14 1.07 3.1 1 Yes RCUT 1.18 0.96 3.1 9 Yes (Signalized) Currently a signalized intersection. RCUT N/A NIA N/A N/A No (Unsignalized) Jughandle 2 Yes Displaced Left- 1.04 0.83 2.4 3 Yes Turn Currently a 4-Leg intersection. Continuous N/A N/A N/A N/A No Green Tee Not enough available space Quadrant 1.47 1.33 2.2 No Roadway Partial Displaced 1.04 0.91 2.4 Yes Left Turn Partial MUT 1.14 1.03 3.1 Yes Valewood Dr Page 3 of 4 FDOT ICE: Stage 1 Resolution To be filled out by FDOT District Traffic Operations Engineer and District Design Engineer Project Determination Multiple Viable Alternatives Identified: Continue to Stage 2 Comments DTOE Name Signature Date DDE Name Signature Date Valewood Dr Page 4 of 4 Input Worksheet 1 Project Name: Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Stud Project Number: D3191200 Location Collier County, FL Date September 4, 2020 Number of Intersection Legs Major Street Direction East-West VolumeTraffic • Volume (Veh/hr) Percent (%) U-Turn Left Thru Right Heavy Vehicles Volume Growth Eastbound 3 367 2177 2 10.72% 2.28% 6 72 3884 32 6.35% 2.28% 0 105 52 405 2.27% 1.58% 0 58 96 19 6.71 % 3.17% Westbound Southbound Northbound Adjustment Factor 0.80 0.95 0.85 Suggested 0.80 0.95 0.85 Truck to PCE Factor Suggested = 2.00 2.00 FDOT Context Zone C4-General Urban Residential Critical Lane Volume Threshold 2-phase signal Suggested = 1800 1800 3-phase signal Suggested = 1750 1750 4-phase signal Suggested = 1700 1700 Equivalent•Volume Volume (Veh/hr) U-Turn I q Left 11 Thru Right r+ Eastbound 3 7 0 0 416 - 2465 2 4225 35 54 421 106 21 Westbound 78 Southbound 109 Northbound 64 Left -Turn Adjustment Factoi Conversion of left -turning vehicles to equivalent through vehicles Right -turn Adjustment Factoi Conversion of right -turning vehicles to equivalent through vehicles U-turn Adjustment Factoi Conversion of U-turning vehicles to equivalent through vehicles Truck to PCE Factor 1 truck = X Passenger Car Equivalents Critical Lane Volume Sum Limi Saturation Value for Critical Lane Volume Sum at an intersection Capacity Analysis for Planning of Junctions Valewood AM Capacity. • of • Step 2A: Base Conditions Analysis Traffic Signal Number of Lanes for Existing Configuration (Can be edited in "3- Alt Nurn Lanes input" as needed) Northbound pSouthbounTdEastbound Westbound TYPE OF INTERSECTION SheetU L T R LTRTraffic Signal FULL 1 1 02 4 1 1 4 1 Results for Existing Configuration TYPE OF Zone 1 (North) zone 2 (South) Zone 3 (East) INTERSECTION Sheet CLV VIC CLV VIC CLV VIC Zone 4 (west) zones (center) CLV VIC CLV VIC Traffic Signal FULL Existing Configuration Results Overall v/c Pedestrian Bicycle Ratio Accommodation Poor Accommodation Transit Puur Accommodation Fair Step 2B: Alternative Selection Rankings Inclusion Yes/No Comment Continue to Step 3 Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study Project Name: D3191200 Project Number: Collier County, FL Location: September 4, 2020 Date: Major Street East-West Direction At -Grade Non -Roundabout Intersections? Yes Traffic Signal Yes Two -Way Stop Control No Existing Signal All -Way Stop Control No Existing Signal Continuous Green T No 4 Leg Intersection Quadrant Roadway S-W No Church Present in Quadrant WE No Residential Present in Quadrant S-E Yes Vacant Within Quadrant N-W No Residential Present in Quadrant Partial Displaced Left Turn Yes Displaced Left Turn Yes Signalized Restricted Crossing U-Turn Yes Unsignalized Restricted Crossing U-Turn No Existing Signal Median U-Turn Yes Partial Median U-Turn Yes Roundabouts? No Traffic volumes too high 50 CD Miniroundabout 75 CD Miniroundaobut 1x1 1 NS x 2EW 2NS x 1EW 2x2 Grade Separated Interchanges? No Diamond Not enough available space Partial Cloverleaf A Not enough available space Partial Cloverleaf B Not enough available space Displaced Left Turn Interchange Diverging Diamond Interchange Single Point Valewood AM Input Worksheet 2 Input Worksheet 2 Collier Coue,ty, FL Number of Lanes for Non -roundabout Intersections ®OOO�OOO�O©��00�� Continuous Green T ®OOQO0000OQOO �� ® IIIIIIII IIOIME FAUMPAPRO©E ®000M0B00 OOOO OOOO Qu.dr.nt Roadway ®O000O000Oo©oOu©n ®OOO�OOO�OO©�OO©� •-- • ®000�0�0000000000 ®OOO �00000�©000©� '• ®000�0�0000000000 ®OOO �00000�©000©0 ®QOO�QO00OO©0OO©� ®OunnamunuannuO©n Input Worksheet 2 Number TYPE OF INTERCHANGE of Lanes for Interchanges 0000000000©0OO©0 ®OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO ®OQOOOOOQOO©��©O ®� 000 0000 OOOO OOOO ®O QOQO QOQO O©QO O©0 Di.pl.ced Left Turn ®0000000000©0OO©0 ®� 000 0000 OO©0 OO©0 ®� 000 0000 OOOO OOOO Immokelee Road Corridor Congestion Study Collier Coctnty, FL Volume Echo with Shared Lane Adjustment for Non -roundabout Intersections Continuous Green T® I VA mmm mmm0 mM=m mmCEm ®mm®mm0Mm mmmmmmmm ®mmm®mmmmmm=n ROMEO ®PIAV mm®PIAV MWO PIAV M=©PIAVm=® ® I/II M® II MmO II M=© II m=® ®mmm®mmmOmm=©mmCM® ®mm®'' ®mmmOmM=©mm=® ® PIAV mmm PIAV mmO PIAV M=© PRA mCM® ®mm®mmmmOmM=©mm=® ® mmmm 12-mm0 UUME 00120 ®mmmm mmm0 ©0M©W W Mn Capacity Analysis for Planning of Junctions Valewood AM Capacity Analysis for Planning of Junctions Valewood AM Results Worksheet Overall 7 '® BEE\\\ � \ Results for Interchanges TYPE OF INTERCHANGE Ratio E E Partial Cloverleaf A Partial Cloverleaf B 1111SEENWEENNfly WEEME Displaced Left Turn ®y . 1[t\\\1 �„y,, ,.. Diverging .Dia ® , 0 ....�AV AW2 Capacity Analysis for Planning of Junctions Valewood AM TYPE OF INTERSECTION Partial Displaced Left Turn E-W Overall I V/C Ratio V/C Ranking Multimodal Score Pedestrian Accommodations Poor Bicycle Accommodations Transit Accommodations Displaced Left Turn WEN 011NOMENNOM Poor Median U-Turn N-S Fair FairINE Poor Partial Displaced Left Turn N-S Poor Po-- Fair Fair Fair PoorSignalized Partial Median U-Turn E-W EMEMM Fair Fair Poor Partial Median U-Turn N-S Fair Fair Poor Restricted Crossing U- Valewood AM Summary Report - Page 1 of 2 Project Name: Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study Project Number: D3191200 Location: Collier County, FL Date: September 4, 2020 Number of Intersection Legs: Major Street Direction East-West Volume— Traffic • Volume (Veh/hr) Percent (%) U-Turn Left Thru Right Heavy Vehicles Volume Growth Eastbound 3 367 2177 2 10.72% 2.28% Westbound 6 72 3884 32 6.35% 2.28% Southbound 0 105 52 405 2.27% 1.58% Northbound 0 58 96 19 6.71 % 3.17% Adjustment Factor 0.80 0.95 0.85 0.80 0.95 0.85 Suggested Truck to PCE Factor Suggested = 2.00 2.00 FDOT Context Zone C4-General Urban Residential Critical Lane Volume Threshold 2-phase signal Suggested = 1800 1800 3-phase signal Suggested = 1750 1750 4-phase signal Suggested = 1700 1700 Summary Report - Page 2 of 2 Partial Displaced Left Turn E-W • 1.04 1 ..F1 2.4 DWI" Poor Poor Fair Displaced Left Turn 1.04 1 2.4 Poor Poor Fair Median U-Turn N-S 1.10 3 3.1 Fair Fair Partial Displaced Left Turn N-S 1.13 4 2.4 Poor Poor Fair Median U-Turn E-W 1.14 5 3.1 Fair Fair PO Partial Median U-Turn E-W 1.14 5 3.1 Fair Fair Poor Partial Median U-Turn N-S 1.17 7 3.1 Fair Fair Poor bignalizeCl Kestrictedrossing - 1 urn 1.18 8 3.1 Fair Fair Poor Traffic Signal 1.19 9 2.4 Poor Poor Fair Quadrant Roadway S-E 1.47 10 2.2 Poor Poor Poor Valewood AM Project Name: Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Stud Project Number: D3191200 Location: Collier County, FL Date: September 4, 2020 Number of Intersection Legs: Major Street Direction: East-West Traffic Volume Demand Volume (Veh/hr) Percent (%) U-Turn 11 Left *1 Thru 1 Right f* Heavy Vehicles Volume Growth Eastbound 3 367 2177 2 10.72% 2.28% Westbound 6 72 3884 32 6.35% 2.28% Southbound 0 105 52 405 2.27% 1.58% Northbound 0 58 96 19 6.71% 3.17% Adjustment Factor0.80 Factor 0.95 0.85 0.80 0.95 0.85 Suggested Truck to PCE Factor Suggested = 2.00 2.00 FDOT Context Zone C4-General Urban Residential Critical Lane Volume T Threshold 2-phase signal Suggested = 1800 1800 ih 3-phase signal p g Suggested = 1750 Su 1750 4-phase signal Suggested = 1700 1700 Valewood AM Number of Lanes TYPE OF for Non -roundabout Intersections OQQQOQQQOQQ�OQQ� � I/QQQ I/QQQ II©QQ II/QQQ Two-Way Stop Control I/QQQ I/QQQ I/Q©Q I/Q©Q ■�►'•7I/QQQ I/QQQ I/Q©Q I/Q©Q � I/QQQ I/QQQ I/Q©Q I/Q©Q Continuous Green T ®IIQQIIIIIIQQIIQIIQIIIIIIII ®IIIII/II II QI/ Q II QQII IIII ©Q ®IIIIQaIIQQIIIIIPAVPAV IQIIQ A/Q/QIII/I/IIIIQQI/QQII Quadrant RoadwayPartial ® I/QQa II I/QQa I/QQQ ®IIII Q� II QQQ II QQQ II Q00 �7I/Q0� I/QQQ I/Q0� III/00 Displaced Left Turn Q�7I/QQQ I/QQQ I/Q©Q I/Q©Q • I/QQQ I/QQQ I/Q©Q I/QQQ ® QQQQQQQQ I/I/I/Q I/I/I/Q ■u7IIIIIIQIIIIII000QQQQQQ Unsignalized Restricted Crossing U-® Turn QQQQQQQQ I/I/I/Q I/I/I/Q ■u7IIIIIIQIIIIII000QQQQQQ Median U-Turn ® Q I/QQQ I/QQ II II QQ I/ I/QQ ■ w7I/I/QQI/I/000II©QQII©Q Partial Median U-Turn ® QI/QQQI/QQ I/QQQ I/QQQ Qom■ I/QQQ I/QQQQ II ©QQ II ©Q Number of Lanes for Interchanges TYPE OF INTERCHANGE . ��QQQ�QQQ�Q©QQQ©Q II/QQQ II/QQQ I/Q©Q I/Q©Q Partial Cloverleaf A IIQI/QIIQI/QI/II©I/I/I/DII Partial Cloverleaf B ®I/Q®I/Q®I/QI/Q I/QI/Q I/Q I/Q I/Q I/Q I/Q©Q I/Q©Q Displaced -ft Turn I/QQQI/Q®I/QQQI/Q©Q II QQQ II QQQ II Q©Q II Q©Q Diverging Diamond Interchange ®II®II®I/QI/QI/QI/Q I/Q I/Q I/Q I/Q I/Q©Q I/Q©Q Emu I/Q®I/Q®I/Q©QI/Q©Q /QQQ I/QQQ I/Q©Q I/Q©Q Valewood AM Results for Non -roundabout Intersections Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 4 Zone 5 ' Overall TYPE OF INTERSECTION mmmmm�mmmm_® (North) (South) (West) (Center) v1c III Ratio �m mm mm � mm � ��\\I\\ E== mmmmmmmmA�M \\\\ q=== All -Way Stop Control Continuous Green T ®� ®mmmmm�I I\\�N��\\\\\� kWWWWWAW1, 111= MIAM mp g = �mmm Quadrant Roadway Partial Displaced Left Turn TEMENNUMENEENOSignalized Displaced Left Turn®mm Restricted Crossing U-Turn ® �00 MCO �O ®0�� Median U-Turn MENOMONEE\ Partial Median U-Turn ®� � � � \ ■1�i� 0 \\\\\N ��E Valewood AM Detailed Report - Page 4 of 4 Results for Interchanges Zone 1 Zone 2 (Lt Zone 3 Zone 4 Zone 5 (Lt Zone 6 Ratio E ®®®®®®®®®®®® Fair Partial Cloverleaf A Partial Cloverleaf B El �� Displaced Left Turn 940 D ® IMN Valewood AM Input Worksheet 1 Project Name: Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Stud Project Number: D3191200 Location Collier County, FL Date September 4, 2020 Number of Intersection Legs Major Street Direction East-West VolumeTraffic • Volume (Veh/hr) Percent (%) U-Turn Left Thru Right Heavy Vehicles Volume Growth Eastbound 11 325 3511 13 3.80% 2.28% 8 50 1584 7 5.62% 2.28% 0 160 98 286 5.09% 1.58% 0 71 197 49 2.54% 3.17% Westbound Southbound Northbound Adjustment Factor 0.80 0.95 0.85 Suggested 0.80 0.95 0.85 Truck to PCE Factor Suggested = 2.00 2.00 FDOT Context Zone C4-General Urban Residential Critical Lane Volume Threshold 2-phase signal Suggested = 1800 1800 3-phase signal Suggested = 1750 1750 4-phase signal Suggested = 1700 1700 Equivalent•Volume Volume (Veh/hr) U-Turn I q Left 11 Thru Right r+ Eastbound 12 9 0 345 - 3728 14 1711 8 105 305 Westbound 54 Southbound 171 Northbound 0 75 208 52 Left -Turn Adjustment Factoi Conversion of left -turning vehicles to equivalent through vehicles Right -turn Adjustment Factoi Conversion of right -turning vehicles to equivalent through vehicles U-turn Adjustment Factoi Conversion of U-turning vehicles to equivalent through vehicles Truck to PCE Factor 1 truck = X Passenger Car Equivalents Critical Lane Volume Sum Limi Saturation Value for Critical Lane Volume Sum at an intersection Capacity Analysis for Planning of Junctions Valewood PM Capacity. • of • Step 2A: Base Conditions Analysis Traffic Signal Number of Lanes for Existing Configuration (Can be edited in "3- Alt Nurn Lanes input" as needed) Northbound pSouthbounTdEastbound Westbound TYPE OF INTERSECTION SheetU L T R LTRTraffic Signal FULL 1 1 02 4 1 1 4 1 Results for Existing Configuration TYPE OF Zone 1 (North) Zone 2 (south) Zone 3 (East) INTERSECTION Sheet CLV VIC CLV VIC CLV VIC Zone 4 (west) zones (center) CLV VIC CLV VIC Traffic Signal FULL -- -- -- -- - R k -- -- Existing Configuration Results Overall v/c Pedestrian Bicycle a Poor Ratio Accommodation Accommodation Transit Poor Fair Accommodation Step 2B: Alternative Selection Rankings Inclusion Yes/No Comment Continue to Step 3 Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study Project Name: D3191200 Project Number: Collier County, FL Location: September 4, 2020 Date: Major Street East-West Direction At -Grade Non -Roundabout Intersections? Yes Traffic Signal Yes Two -Way Stop Control No Existing Signal All -Way Stop Control No Existing Signal Continuous Green T No 4 Leg Intersection Quadrant Roadway S-W No Church Present in Quadrant N-E No Residential Present in Quadrant S-E No Vacant Within Quadrant N-W No Residential Present in Quadrant Partial Displaced Left Turn Yes Displaced Left Turn Yes Signalized Restricted Crossing U-Turn Yes Unsignalized Restricted Crossing U-Turn No Existing Signal Median U-Turn Yes Partial Median U-Turn Yes Roundabouts? No Traffic volumes too high 50 ICD Miniroundabout 75 CD Miniroundaobut 1x1 1 NS x 2EW 2NS x 1EW 2x2 Grade Separated Interchanges? No Diamond Not enough available space Partial Cloverleaf A Not enough available space Partial Cloverleaf B Not enough available space Displaced Left Turn Interchange Diverging Diamond Interchange Single Point Valewood PM Input Worksheet 2 Input Worksheet 2 Collier County, FL Number of Lanes for Non -roundabout Intersections ®OOO�OOO�O©��00�� Continuous Green T ®OOQO0000OQOO �� ®IIIIIIIIIIMIIOIIO©IIIIOBE ®000M 0M00 FROM OOOO Qu.dnmt Roadway ®O000O000Oo©oOu©n •-- • ®0�0��0000000000 ®OOO �00000�©0 �0©0 '• ®0�0��0000000000 ®OOO �00000�©0 �0©0 ®QOO�QO00OO©0OO©� ®O nun O000aO©oaO©o Input Worksheet 2 Number TYPE OF INTERCHANGE of Lanes for Interchanges 0000000000©0OO©0 ®OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO ®OQOOOOOQOO©��©O ®� 000 0000 OOOO OOOO ®O QOQO QOQO O©QO O©0 Di.pl.ced Left Turn ®0000000000©0OO©0 ® � 000 0000 OO©0 � 0©0 ®� 000 0000 OOOO OOOO Immokelee Road Corridor Congestion Study Collier County, FL Volume Echo with Shared Lane Adjustment for Non -roundabout Intersections Continuous Green T ®MAmIM0 MA®®' ®' PAv MEEm MAm®0 Capacity Analysis for Planning of Junctions Valewood PM Capacity Analysis for Planning of Junctions Valewood PM Results Worksheet Overall 7111MMIM '® MMM Results for Interchanges TYPE OF INTERCHANGE Ratio E E ®®®®®®®®®®®® ®'NAVM' ' �M'\\ . MA PA PIMV MMEMEM Partial Cloverleaf A MIA MMM Partial Cloverleaf B MM aisaw"s Displaced Left Turn 01- 344 0.19 Diverging Diamond Interchange ®ONE 0 Capacity Analysis for Planning of Junctions Valewood PM TYPE OF INTERSECTION Displaced Left Turn Overall V/C Ratio \� V/C Ranking Multimodal Score Pedestrian Accommodations Bicycle Accommodations Transit Accommodations Partial DisplacedPartial Partial Displaced Left Turn E-W Poor Poor Fair Median U-Turn N-S \\\\ Fair Fair Poor Median U-Turn N-S \\\\\ Fair Fair Poor Signalized Restricted Crossing U- Turn E-W \� Fair Fair Poor Partial Median U-Turn E-W Fair Fair Poor Traffic Signal WON Poor Poor Fair Median U-Turn E-W Fair Fair Poor Signalized Restricted Crossing Turn N-S Fair Fair Poor Valewood PM Summary Report - Page 1 of 2 Project Name: Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study Project Number: D3191200 Location: Collier County, FL Date: September 4, 2020 Number of Intersection Legs: Major Street Direction East-West Volume— Traffic • Volume (Veh/hr) Percent (%) U-Turn Left Thru Right Heavy Vehicles Volume Growth Eastbound 11 325 3511 13 3.80% 2.28% Westbound 8 50 1584 7 5.62% 2.28% Southbound 0 160 98 286 5.09% 1.58% Northbound 0 71 197 49 2.54% 3.17% Adjustment Factor 0.80 0.95 0.85 0.80 0.95 0.85 Suggested Truck to PCE Factor Suggested = 2.00 2.00 FDOT Context Zone C4-General Urban Residential Critical Lane Volume Threshold 2-phase signal Suggested = 1800 1800 3-phase signal Suggested = 1750 1750 4-phase signal Suggested = 1700 1700 Summary Report - Page 2 of 2 TYPE OF INTERSECTION Displaced Left Turn Overall v/c Ratio 0.83 V/C Ranking 1 Multimodal Score 2.4 Pedestrian Bicycle Transit Accommodation Accommodation Accommodatio Poor Poor Fair Partial Displaced Left Turn N-S 0.89 2 2.4 Poor Poor Falr Partial Displaced Left Turn E-W 0.91 3 2.4 Poor Poor Fair Partial Median U-Turn N-S 0.94 4 3.1 Fair Fair Po Median U-Turn N-S 0.95 5 3.1 Fair Fair Poo bignalizea Kestrictedrossing - I urn 0.96 6 3.1 Fair Fair Poo Partial Median U-Turn E-W 1.03 7 3.1 Fair Fair Poo Traffic Signal 1.07 8 2.4 Poor Poor Fair Median U-Turn E-W 1.07 8 3.1 Fair Fair Poor Igna ize es rice rossing - I urn 4.00 10 3.1 Fair Fair Poor Valewood PM Project Name: Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Stud Project Number: D3191200 Location: Collier County, FL Date: September 4, 2020 Number of Intersection Legs: Major Street Direction: East-West Traffic Volume Demand Volume (Veh/hr) Percent (%) U-Turn 11 Left *1 Thru 1 Right f* Heavy Vehicles Volume Growth Eastbound 11 325 3511 13 3.80% 2.28% Westbound 8 50 1584 7 5.62% 2.28% Southbound 0 160 98 286 5.09% 1.58% Northbound 0 71 197 49 2.54% 3.17% Adjustment Factor0.80 Factor 0.95 0.85 0.80 0.95 T 0.85 Suggested Truck to PCE Factor Suggested = 2.00 2.00 FDOT Context Zone C4-General Urban Residential Critical Lane Volume Threshold 2-phase signal Suggested = 1800 1800 3-phase signal Suggested = 1750 1750 4-phase signal Suggested = 1700 1700 Valewood PM Number of Lanes TYPE OF for Non -roundabout Intersections OQQQOQQQOQQ�OQQ� � I/QQQ I/QQQ II©QQ II/QQQ Two-Way Stop Control I/QQQ I/QQQ I/Q©Q I/Q©Q ■�►'•7I/QQQ I/QQQ I/Q©Q I/Q©Q � I/QQQ I/QQQ I/Q©Q I/Q©Q Continuous Green T ®IIQQIIIIIIQQIIQIIQIIIIIIII ®IIIII/II II QI/ Q II QQII IIII ©Q ®IIIIQaIIQQIIIIIPAVPAV IQIIQ AI/QI/a III/I/II I I QQ I/QQII Quadrant RoadwayPartial ® I/QQa II I/QQa I/QQQ ®IIII Q� II QQQ II QQQ II Q00 �7I/Q0� I/QQQ I/Q0� III/00 Displaced Left Turn Q�7I/QQQ I/QQQ I/Q©Q I/Q©Q • I/QQQ I/QQQ I/QQQ I/QQQ ® QQQQQQQQ I/I/I/Q I/I/I/Q ■u7IIIIIIQIIIIII000QQQQQQ Unsignalized Restricted Crossing U-® Turn QQQQQQQQ I/I/I/Q I/I/I/Q ■u7IIIIIIQIIIIII000QQQQQQ Median U-Turn ® Q I/QQQ I/QQ II II QQ I/ I/QQ ■u7 IIII QQ IIII QQQ I/ QQQ I/ QQ Partial Median U-Turn ® QI/QQQI/QQ I/QQQ I/QQQ Qom■ I/QQQ I/QQQQ II ©QQ II ©Q Number of Lanes for Interchanges TYPE OF INTERCHANGE . ��QQQ�QQQ�Q©QQQ©Q II/QQQ II/QQQ I/Q©Q I/Q©Q Partial Cloverleaf A IIQI/QIIQI/QI/II©I/I/I/DII Partial Cloverleaf B ®I/Q®I/Q®I/QI/Q I/QI/Q I/Q I/Q I/Q I/Q I/Q©Q I/Q©Q Displaced -ft Turn I/QQQI/Q®II®QPIVA Q II QQQ II QQQ II Q©Q II Q©Q Diverging Diamond Interchange ®II®II®I/QI/QI/QI/Q I/Q I/Q I/Q I/Q I/Q©Q I/Q©Q I/Q®I/Q®I/Q©QI/Q©Q I/QQQ I/QQQ I/Q©Q I/Q©Q Valewood PM Results for Non -roundabout Intersections TYPE OF INTERSECTION mmmmm�mm� Zone 1 (North) Zone 2 (South) Zone 4 Zone 5 (West) ' (Center) Overall v1c Ratio III �m ® mm mm _ mContinuous � mmmmmmmm Two -Way Stop Control All -Way Stop Control Green T Quadrant Roadway 11MEO\\O EE ® mm MPIR Partial Displaced Left Turn _ \ Displaced Left Turn\ Signalized Restricted Crossing U-Turn �� e;.r!r! Unsignalized Restricted Crossing U-Turn Valewood PM Capacity• • of • Detailed Report - Page 4 of 4 Results for Roundabouts c o 0 0 Zone 1 (North) Zone 3 (East) Zone 2 (South) Zone 4 (West) A v 2 v - v TYPE OF Overall v/c , 0 0 c o ROUNDABOUT Ratio d E o E E m E m E E L 0 0 Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 Lane 1 Lane 2 Lane 3 501CD -0.70 Falr Fair Fair 751CD 0.12 Fair Fair Fair 0.86 1 X 1 + Fair Fair Fair 1 NS X 2EW t Poor Fair Fair 2NS X 1 EW Poor Fair Fair 2 X 2 Poor Falr Falr ` Results for Interchanges N N C C O O N O 0 Zone 1 Zone 2 (Lt Zone 3 Zone 4 Zone 5 (Lt Zone 6 TYPE OF INTERCHANGE Sheet (Rt Mrg) Mrg) (Ctr. 1) (Ctr. 2) Mrg) (Rt Mrg) Overall v/c a o 1 o o Ratio d E o f d E m E i E E 0. f01 0 U U U CLV V/C CLV V/C CLV V/C CLV V/C CLV V/C CLV V/C a a U a N-S 1210 0.69 Poor Poor Fair Diamond Poor Poor Fair E-W N-S 333 0.18 646 0.36 Poor Poor Fair Partial Cloverleaf A Poor Fair E-W 667 0.37 Poor 355 0.20 463 0.26 N-S Poor Poor Fair Partial Cloverleaf B Poor Poor Fair E-W 951 0.53 N-S 733 0.41 238 0.13 Poor Poor Fair Displaced Left Turn E-W 958 0.53 Poor Poor Fair 661 0.37 174 0.10 Fair Fair Fair Diverging Diamond N=S 561 0.31 344 0.19 829 0.46 442 0.25 E-W 954 0.53 +• 667 0.37 Fair Fair Interchange Fair 562 0.31 751 0.44 175 0.10 Poor Poor Fair N-S Single Point E-W 954 0.53 + + Poor Poor Fair Valewood PM Florida Department of Transportation Intersection Control Evaluation Form 750-010-30 Intersection Control Evaluation (ICE) Form Stage 1: Screening To fulfill the requirements of Stage 1 (Screening) of FDOT's ICE procedures, complete the following form and append all supporting documentation. Completed forms can be submitted to the District Traffic Operations Engineer (DTOE) and District Design Engineer (DDE) for the project's approval. Project Name Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study FDOT Project # Date 09/15/20 Submitted By Robert Grubel Agency/Companyl Jacobs Engineering, Inc. I Emaill Robert.Grubel@jacobs.com FDOT Context Classification I C4 - Urban General I FDOT Districtl District 1 1 Countyl Collier Project Locality (City/Town/Village) Collier County I Project Typel Corridor Improvement Project The 2018 AUIR projects the intersection of Livingston Road and Immokalee Road to be deficient by 2023 and Project Purpose (What Immokalee Road from I-75 to Logan Boulevard to be deficient by 2026. is the catalyst for this project and why is it being undertaken?) Project Setting Description This is the T-intersection. The northwest corner contains Restaurant, Spa, Urgent care and State Farm. The (Describe the area surrounding the northeast corner contains a Mobil Gas Station and Residential . The southside of this intersection is vacant. intersection ) Sidewalk exists along the eastbound direction on Immokalee Road and multiuse path along the westbound Multimodal Context approach. There are no bike lane facilites on any of the approaches. Bus service travels along Immokalee (Describe the pedestrian, bicycle, and transit Road however no stops are located at this intersection. activity in the area and the potential for activity based on surrounding land uses and development patterns ) Major Street Information Route #: CR 846 1 Route Name(s)l Immokalee Road I Milepost Existing Control Type Signal Existing AADT1 50,700 Design Year AADT 1 82,700 Design Vehicle Interstate Semitrailer (WB-62) I Control Vehiciel Interstate Semitrailer (WB-62) Primary Functional Classification Urban Principal Arterial Design Speed (mph) 45 Secondary Functional Classification (if app.)i Target Speed (mph) [if app.] 45 Direction Eastbound Number of Lanes Study Period #1 Traffic Volumes Study Period #2 Traffic Volumes Sidewalks along One side of the approach Left -Turn 1 �* Crosswalk on Approach? No Left -Through 0 Weekday AM Peak Weekday PM Peak o On -Street Bike Facilities? No Through 3 Left 36 Left 14 Q Multi -Use Path? No Left -Through -Right 0 Through 2,464 Through 3,980 Scheduled Bus Service? Yes Through -Right 0 Right 0 Right 0 Bus Stop on Approach? No Right -Turn 0 Daily Truck % 8.4% Direction Westbound Number of Lanes Study Period #1 Traffic Volumes Study Period #2 Traffic Volumes Sidewalks along: One side of the approach Left -Turn 0 Crosswalk on Approach? No Left -Through 0 Weekday AM Peak Weekday PM Peak o On -Street Bike Facilities? No Through 3 Left 0 Left 0 Q Multi -Use Path? Yes Left -Through -Right 0 Through 4,228 Through 1,690 Scheduled Bus Service? Yes Through -Right 0 Right 290 Right 126 Bus Stop on Approach? No Right -Turn 1 Daily Truck %1 6.2% Executive Dr Page 1 of 4 FDOT ICE: Stage 1 Minor Street Information Route #: 1 Route Name(s)l Palazzo Dr Milepost (if app.) Existing Control Typel Signal I Existing AADTJ 100 1 Design Year AADTJ 200 Design Vehicle I Interstate Semitrailer (WB-62) I Control Vehiclel Interstate Semitrailer (WB-62) Primary Functional Classificationi Urban Major Collector Design Speed (mph) 30 Secondary Functional Classification (if app.)i Urban Minor Arterial Target Speed (mph) [if app.] 30 Direction Southbound Number of Lanes Study Period #1 Traffic Volumes Study Period #2 Traffic Volumes Sidewalks along: Neither side of the approach Left -Turn 0 �* Crosswalk on Approach? No Left -Through 0 Weekday AM Peak Weekday PM Peak o On -Street Bike Facilities? No Through 0 Left 0 Left 0 Multi -Use Path. No Left -Through -Right 0 Through 0 Through 0 Scheduled Bus Service? No Through -Right 0 Right 29 Right 19 Bus Stop on Approach? No Right-Tuml 1 Daily Truck % 10.5% Direction Number of Lanes Study Period #1 Traffic Volumes Study Period #2 Traffic Volumes Sidewalks along: Left -Turn Crosswalk on Approach? Left -Through Weekday AM Peak Weekday PM Peak o On -Street Bike Facilities? Through Left Left Q Multi -Use Path? Left -Through -Right Through Through Scheduled Bus Service? Through -Right Right Right Bus Stop on Approach? Right-Turni Daily Truck % Direction Number of Lanes Study Period #1 Traffic Volumes Study Period #2 Traffic Volumes Sidewalks along: Left -Turn Crosswalk on Approach? Left -Through Weekday AM Peak Weekday PM Peak o On -Street Bike Facilities? Through Left Left Q Multi -Use Path? Left -Through -Right Through Through Scheduled Bus Service? Through -Right Right Right Bus Stop on Approach? Right -Turn Daily Truck Crash History (Existing Intersections Only) Append the most recent five -years of crash data for the intersection from the CAR System. If the crash data evidences any issues relating to safety performance, discuss briefly here: Within the last five years (2014-2018), there were approximatley 19 crashes reported, 6 of which were not reported short form. No fatal or major injuries. Excluding short form crash reports, the crash severity included 0- Fatal, 0- Major Injury, 3-Minor Injury, 1-Possible Injury, and 2-Property Damage. The 6 crash types are broken down by: 4-Rear End, and 2-Sideswipe. Executive Dr Page 2 of 4 FDOT ICE: Stage 1 Control Strategy Evaluation Provide a brief justification as to why each of the following control strategies should be advanced or not. Justification should consider potential environmental impacts. CAP-X Outputs V/C Ratio Justification Weekday AM Weekday PM Multimodal SPICE Strategy to Be Control Strategy Peak Peak Score Ranking Advanced? Two -Way Stop- 14.98 17.03 1.90 7 Yes Controlled High v/c ratio compared to alternatives. All -Way Stop- 5.23 4.18 3.3 No Controlled Signalized 1.04 0.94 2.4 4 Yes Control Roundabout 2.10 1.76 2.8 6 Yes Median U-Turn 0.94 0.81 3.1 1 Yes RCUT 0.92 0.79 3.1 8 Yes (Signalized) High v/c ratio compared to alternatives. RCUT 79,56 1.06 2.2 No (Unsignalized) Jughandle 2 Yes Displaced Left- 0.88 0.80 2.4 3 Yes Turn Continuous 0.00 0.00 1.5 9 Yes Green Tee Quadrant 1.33 1.22 2.2 Yes Roadway Partial MUT 0.94 0.83 3.1 Yes Partial Displaced 0.88 0.82 2.4 Yes Left Turn Executive Dr Page 3 of 4 FDOT ICE: Stage 1 Resolution To be filled out by FDOT District Traffic Operations Engineer and District Design Engineer Project Determination Multiple Viable Alternatives Identified: Continue to Stage 2 Comments DTOE Name Signature Date DDE Name Signature Date Executive Dr Page 4 of 4 Input Worksheet 1 Project Name: Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Stud Project Number: D3191200 Location Collier County, FL Date September 4, 2020 Number of Intersection Legs Major Street Direction East-West VolumeTraffic • Volume (Veh/hr) Percent (%) U-Turn Left Thru Right Heavy Vehicles Volume Growth Eastbound 4 32 2464 0 12.26% 2.63% 0 0 4228 290 6.61% 2.63% 0 0 0 29 8.70% 1.58% 0 0 0 1 0.00% 0.00% Westbound Southbound Northbound Adjustment Factor 0.80 0.95 0.85 0.80 0.95 0.85 Suggested Truck to PCE Factor Suggested = 2.00 2.00 FDOT Context Zone C4-General Urban Residential Critical Lane Volume Threshold 2-phase signal Suggested = 1800 1800 3-phase signal Suggested = 1750 1750 4-phase signal Suggested = 1700 1700 Equivalent•Volume Volume (Veh/hr) U-Turn I q Left 11 Thru Right r+ Eastbound 5 0 0 0 37 - 2839 0 4626 317 0 32 0 1 Westbound 0 Southbound 0 Northbound 0 Left -Turn Adjustment Factoi Conversion of left -turning vehicles to equivalent through vehicles Right -turn Adjustment Factoi Conversion of right -turning vehicles to equivalent through vehicles U-turn Adjustment Factoi Conversion of U-turning vehicles to equivalent through vehicles Truck to PCE Factor 1 truck = X Passenger Car Equivalents Critical Lane Volume Sum Limi Saturation Value for Critical Lane Volume Sum at an intersection Capacity Analysis for Planning of Junctions Executive AM Capacity. • of • Step 2A: Base Conditions Analysis Traffic Signal Number of Lanes for Existing Configuration (Can be edited in "3- Alt Nurn Lanes input" as needed) Northbound pSouthbound Eastbound Westbound TYPE OF INTERSECTION SheetU L T R R U LTRTraffic Signal FULL 0 0 0 1 1 3 0 0 3 1 Results for Existing Configuration TYPE OF Zone 1 (North) Zone 2 (south) Zone 3 (East) Zone a (west) zones (center) INTERSECTION Sheet CLV VIC CLV VIC CLV VIC CLV VIC CLV VIC Traffic Signal FULL -- -- -- -- :: k • Existing Configuration Results Overall v/c Pedestrian Bicycle Transit a• Poor Poor Fair Ratio Accommodation Accommodation Accommodation Step 2B: Alternative Selection Rankings Inclusion Yes/No Comment Continue to Step 3 Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study Project Name: D3191200 Project Number: Collier County, FL Location: September 4, 2020 Date: Major Street East-West Direction At -Grade Non -Roundabout Intersections? Yes Traffic Signal Yes Two -Way Stop Control Yes All -Way Stop Control No Existing Two -Way Stop Control Continuous Green T Yes Quadrant Roadway S-W Yes WE No mercial &Residential Present in Quad S-E Yes N-W No Plaza Presents in Quadrant Partial Displaced Left Turn Yes Displaced Left Turn Yes Signalized Restricted Crossing U-Turn Yes Unsignalized Restricted Crossing U-Turn Yes Median U-Turn Yes Partial Median U-Turn Yes Roundabouts? Yes 50 ICD Miniroundabout No 75 ICD Miniroundaobut No 1x1 No 1 NS x 2EW No 2NS x 1EW No 2x2 Yes Grade Separated Interchanges? No Diamond Partial Cloverleaf A Partial Cloverleaf B Displaced Left Turn Interchange Diverging Diamond Interchange Single Point Executive AM Input Worksheet 2 Input Worksheet 2 Collier Coumty, FL Number of Lanes for Non -roundabout Intersections Continuous Green T ®O��O 0000OQO �OOOO ® IIIIII0 FAMMIO IIO©FAPRO©E ®000M0BU0 OOOO OMOO ® FAMINE 1210III/ I/10mm FAMBPA Qu.dr.nt Roadway ®O000O000Oo©oOm©n •-- • ®��0��00000 �0000 ®O00000000�©��©0 ®QOO�QO00OO©��©� Input Worksheet 2 Number TYPE OF INTERCHANGE of Lanes for Interchanges 0000000000©0OO©0 ®OOOOOOOOOO ��' OOOO ®OQOOOOOQOO©��©O ®� 000 0000 OOOO OOOO ®O QOQO QOQO O©QO O©0 Di.pl.ced Left Turn ®0000000000©0OO©0 ®� 000 0000 OO©0 OO©0 ®� 000 0000 OOOO OOOO Immokelee Road Corridor Congestion Study Collier Coctnty, FL Volume Echo with Shared Lane Adjustment for Non -roundabout Intersections ®IvA n IvA 0' ®PIVA®M0' IB = ®IvA0' n IvA 0' wIvAwm IB = Continuous Green T® ®PIAV00pAv PIAVW 0®PIAV®W 0 PIAVWWRAV PIVAMMPIVA �0m®IvAnnpVA �®MMA �mmn PIVAMnn®PIAV000 PIAVW 0®PIAV®m0 �0m® ® �� 00 �00® �®M0 �0' m® ®�000 �00®�RVAM �Qm® IvAnnn® PIAV 000 IvA QQ® � ®mQPIVAMMM � Qm® ®IvAnmm 12- ININU12- IN IN ®©0M000M® ®©0mn00M® ®0�000 �0®PIAV PAVM0 MEPIVAM® ® II000IIOO® © II MOO MEMO ®0PAVnnnP 0' ®PIAV®m0 PIAV0m® ® IvA000 IvA00®© ME Mn 0 ME M® Capacity Analysis for Planning of Junctions Executive AM Capacity Analysis for Planning of Junctions Executive AM Results Worksheet Results for Interchanges TYPE•(Ctr Zone 4 Overall INTERCHANGE Ratio E E ®®®®®®®®®®®® NESSEM CloverleafPartial I... I too 1111MEONWEEMM Partial Cloverleaf B PIAV MPIAV® ..Displaced REM Left Turn, I l l 10 1 too ® Diverging Diarnon. Interchange ® am W A\\\\ MPIAV I NOWN wo \oo \\ �� IAV ®\\000\ IAV Capacity Analysis for Planning of Junctions Executive AM Overall TYPE OF INTERSECTION V/C Ratio V/C Ranking Multimodal Score Pedestrian Accommodations Bicycle Accommodations Transit Accommodations Continuous Green T W WOM MIWHEEMS prr- Poor Fair IRWINContinuous Green T S Poor Poor Fair Partial Displaced Left Turn E-W Poor Poor Fair Displaced Left Turn \\\\ Poor Poor Fair �\ Fair Fair Poor Partial Displaced Left Turn N-S U am Poor Poor Fair Continuous Green T N \\ \�� Poor Poor Fair Partial Median U-Turn N-S \\ Fair Fair Poor Signalized Restricted Crossing U- Turn E-W \� Fair Fair Poor Executive AM Summary Report - Page 1 of 2 Project Name: Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study Project Number: D3191200 Location: Collier County, FL Date: September 4, 2020 Number of Intersection Legs: Major Street Direction East-West Volume— Traffic • Volume (Veh/hr) Percent (%) U-Turn Left Thru Right Heavy Vehicles Volume Growth Eastbound 4 32 2464 0 12.26% 2.63% Westbound 0 0 4228 290 6.61 % 2.63% Southbound 0 0 0 29 8.70% 1.58% Northbound 0 0 0 1 0.00% 0.00% Adjustment Factor 0.80 0.95 0.85 0.80 0.95 0.85 Suggested Truck to PCE Factor Suggested = 2.00 2.00 FDOT Context Zone C4-General Urban Residential Critical Lane Volume Threshold 2-phase signal Suggested = 1800 1800 3-phase signal Suggested = 1750 1750 4-phase signal Suggested = 1700 1700 Summary Report - Page 2 of 2 TYPE OF INTERSECTION #N/A Overall v/c Ratio 0.00 V/C Ranking 1 Multimodal Score #N/A Pedestrian Bicycle Transit Accommodation Accommodation Accommodatio #N/A #N/A #N/A Continuous Green T W 0.03 2 1.5 Poor Poor Fair Continuous Green T S 0.54 3 1.5 Poor Poor Fair Partial Displaced Left Turn E-W 0.88 4 2.4 Poor Poor Fair Displaced Left Turn 0.88 4 2.4 Poor Poor Fair Median U-Turn N-S 0.88 4 3.1 Fair Fair Poor Partial Displaced Left Turn N-S 0.90 7 2.4 Poor Poor Fair Continuous Green T N 0.91 8 1.5 Poor Poor Fair Partial Median U-Turn N-S 0.91 8 3.1 Fair Fair Poor bignalizea Kestrictedrossing - 1 urn 0.92 10 3.1 Fair Fair Poor Executive AM Project Name: Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Stud Project Number: D3191200 Location: Collier County, FL Date: September 4, 2020 Number of Intersection Legs: Major Street Direction: East-West Traffic Volume Demand Volume (Veh/hr) Percent (%) U-Turn 11 Left *1 Thru 1 Right f* Heavy Vehicles Volume Growth Eastbound 4 32 2464 0 12.26% 2.63% Westbound 0 0 4228 290 6.61% 2.63% Southbound 0 0 0 29 8.70% 1.58% Northbound 0 0 0 1 0.00% 0.00% Adjustment Factor0.80 Factor 0.95 0.85 0.80 0.95 0.85 Suggested Truck to PCE Factor Suggested = 2.00 2.00 FDOT Context Zone C4-General Urban Residential Critical Lane Volume T Threshold 2-phase signal Suggested = 1800 1800 ih 3-phase signal p 9 Suggested = 1750 Su 1750 4-phase signal Suggested = 1700 1700 Executive AM Number of Lanes TYPE OF for Non -roundabout Intersections OQQQOQQQOQQ�OQQ� � I/QQQ I/QQQ I/Q©� I/Q©Q Two-Way Stop Control I/QQQ I/QQQ I/Q©� I/Q©Q ■�►'•7I/QQQ I/QQQ I/Q©� I/Q©Q � I/QQQ I/QQQ I/Q©� I/Q©Q Continuous Green T ®IIQQIIIIIIQQIIQII�IIIIIIII ®IIIII/II II QI/ Q II QQII IIII ©Q ®IIIIQaIIQQIIIIIPAVPAV IQIIQ A/Q/QIII/I/III/I/QaI/QQII Quadrant RoadwayPartial ® I/QQa II I/QQa I/QQQ ®IIII Q� II QQQ II QQQ II Q00 �7I/QQQ I/QQQ I/Q0� III/00 Displaced Left Turn Q�7I/QQQ I/QQQ I/Q©� I/Q©Q • EWE I/QQQ I/QQQ I/Q©Q I/QQQ ® QQQQQQQQ I/I/I/a I/I/I/Q ■u7IIIIIIQIIIIII000QQQQQQ Unsignalized Restricted Crossing U-® Turn QQQQQQQa I/I/I/Q I/I/I/Q IIIQIIIQQQQQQQQQ Median U-Turn ® Q I/QQQ I/QQ II II QQ I/ I/QQ ■ w7I/I/QQI/I/000II©QQII©Q Partial Median U-Turn ® QI/QQQI/QQ I/QQa I/QQQ Qom■ I/QQQ I/QQQQ II ©QQ II ©Q Number of Lanes for Interchanges TYPE OF INTERCHANGE . ��QQQ�QQQ�Q©QQQ©Q II/QQQ II/QQQ I/Q©Q I/Q©Q Partial Cloverleaf A IIQI/QIIQI/QI/II©I/I/I/DII Partial Cloverleaf B ®I/Q®I/Q®I/QI/Q I/QI/Q I/Q I/Q I/Q I/Q I/Q©Q I/Q©Q Displaced -ft Turn I/QQQI/Q®I/QQQI/Q©Q II QQQ II QQQ II Q©Q II Q©Q Diverging Diamond Interchange ®II®II®I/QI/QI/QI/Q I/Q I/Q I/Q I/Q I/Q©Q I/Q©Q Emu I/Q®I/Q®I/Q©QI/Q©Q /QQQ I/QQQ I/Q©Q I/Q©Q Executive AM Results for Non -roundabout Intersections Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 4 Zone 5 ' Overall TYPE OF INTERSECTION mmmmm�mm�_ (North) (South) (West) (Center) v1c Ratio �m `&2vvvvvvv mmmmmm21\ mm W Two -Way Stop Control All -Way Stop Control ® mm mm mm W NE o.�� BBER,a ®mmmmm m� ®� Continuous Green T �� EE ��M1 ®M�mp �mmm Quadrant Roadway 111MMENHOWNWER" NMEPartial Displaced Left Turn Displaced Left Turn Signalized Restricted Crossing U-Turn Unsignalized Restricted Crossing U-Turn Executive AM Detailed Report - Page 4 of 4 Results for Interchanges Zone 1 Zone 2 (Lt Zone 3 Zone 4 Zone 5 (Lt Zone 6 Ratio E ®®®®®®®®®®®® TIMM Partial Cloverleaf A Partial Cloverleaf B Displaced Left Turn M1 94-1 Diverging Diamond Interchange 948 VICE 948 Executive AM Input Worksheet 1 Project Name: Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Stud Project Number: D3191200 Location Collier County, FL Date September 4, 2020 Number of Intersection Legs Major Street Direction East-West VolumeTraffic • Volume (Veh/hr) Percent (%) U-Turn Left Thru Right Heavy Vehicles Volume Growth Eastbound 2 12 3980 0 4.53% 2.63% 0 0 1690 126 5.71 % 2.63% 0 0 0 19 12.20% 1.58% 0 0 0 1 0.00% 0.00% Westbound Southbound Northbound Adjustment Factor 0.80 0.95 0.85 Suggested 0.80 0.95 0.85 Truck to PCE Factor Suggested = 2.00 2.00 FDOT Context Zone C4-General Urban Residential Critical Lane Volume Threshold 2-phase signal Suggested = 1800 1800 3-phase signal Suggested = 1750 1750 4-phase signal Suggested = 1700 1700 Equivalent•Volume Volume (Veh/hr) U-Turn Left Thru Right Eastbound 2 0 0 0 13 4270 0 1833 137 0 22 0 1 Westbound 0 Southbound 0 Northbound 0 Left -Turn Adjustment Factoi Conversion of left -turning vehicles to equivalent through vehicles Right -turn Adjustment Factoi Conversion of right -turning vehicles to equivalent through vehicles U-turn Adjustment Factoi Conversion of U-turning vehicles to equivalent through vehicles Truck to PCE Factor 1 truck = X Passenger Car Equivalents Critical Lane Volume Sum Limi Saturation Value for Critical Lane Volume Sum at an intersection Capacity Analysis for Planning of Junctions Executive PM Capacity. • of • Step 2A: Base Conditions Analysis Traffic Signal Number of Lanes for Existing Configuration (Can be edited in "3- Alt Nurn Lanes input" as needed) Northbound pSouthbound Eastbound Westbound TYPE OF INTERSECTION SheetU L T R R U LTRTraffic Signal FULL 0 0 0 1 1 3 0 0 3 1 Results for Existing Configuration TYPE OF Zone 1 (North) zone 2 (south) Zone 3 (East) INTERSECTION Sheet CLV VIC CLV VIC CLV VIC Zone 4 (west) zones (center) CLV VIC CLV VIC Traffic Signal FULL -- -- -- -- Existing Configuration Results Overall v/c Pedestrian Bicycle Ratio Accommodation Poor Accommodation Transit Puur Accommodation Fair Step 2B: Alternative Selection Rankings Inclusion Yes/No Comment Continue to Step 3 Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study Project Name: D3191200 Project Number: Collier County, FL Location: September 4, 2020 Date: Major Street East-West Direction At -Grade Non -Roundabout Intersections? Yes Traffic Signal Yes Two -Way Stop Control Yes All -Way Stop Control No Existing Two -Way Stop Control Continuous Green T Yes Quadrant Roadway S-W Yes Quadrant is Vacant N-E No mercial &Residential Present in Quad S-E Yes Quadrant is Vacant N-W No Plaza Presents in Quadrant Partial Displaced Left Turn Yes Displaced Left Turn Yes Signalized Restricted Crossing U-Turn Yes Unsignalized Restricted Crossing U-Turn Yes Median U-Turn Yes Partial Median U-Turn Yes Roundabouts? Yes 50 ICD Miniroundabout No 75 ICD Miniroundaobut No 1x1 No 1 NS x 2EW No 2NS x 1EW No 2x2 Yes Grade Separated Interchanges? No Diamond Partial Cloverleaf A Partial Cloverleaf B Displaced Left Turn Interchange Diverging Diamond Interchange Single Point Executive PM Input Worksheet 2 Input Worksheet 2 Collier Coue,ty, FL Number of Lanes for Non -roundabout Intersections Continuous Green T ®O��O 0000OQO �OOOO ®IIIIIIIIIIMIIOIIO©IIIIOBE ®000M 0MB0 FROM OMOO ® FAMINE 1210III/ I/10ma FAM©II Qu.dnmt Roadway ®O000O000Oo©oOm©n •-- • ®��0��00000 �0000 ®OOO�00000�©��©0 ®O00000000�©��©0 ®QOO�QO00OO©��©� ®O man O000aO©oaO©o Input Worksheet 2 Number TYPE OF INTERCHANGE of Lanes for Interchanges 0000000000©0OO©0 ®OOOOOOOOOOO�OOOO ®OOOOOOOOOO©OOO©O ®� 000 0000 OOOO OOOO ®O QOQO QOQO O©QO O©0 Di.pl.ced Left Turn ®0000000000©0OO©0 ® � 000 0000 OO©0 � 0©0 ®� 000 0000 OOOO OOOO Immokelee Road Corridor Congestion Study Collier Coctnty, FL Volume Echo with Shared Lane Adjustment for Non -roundabout Intersections ® I/ o00I/00® II ®MOIIII EEO ® MAV 000 MvA QQ® MAV ®MQ PRAMMO ®MvAnnn 1VA 0' ®PIVAMM PIVA0E® ®PIVA0nnMvAn ®PIVA®®' 0' IBM= ®0�000 MAV0®MAV PAVMQ MEPIVAIM® Mn MA� O®© PIVAM 0�IM® ®0�Mn nP 0' ®MAV ®MQ MAV O[M® ®I/o00I/00®©IIMOOIIEEO Capacity Analysis for Planning of Junctions Executive PM Capacity Analysis for Planning of Junctions Executive PM Results Worksheet Results for Interchanges TYPE OF Zone 1 (Rt Zone 2 (U Zone 3 (Ctr. Zone 4 (Ctr. Zone 5 (U Zone 6 (Rt INTERCHANGE Ratio E E ®®®®®®®®®®®® ®'�M' \o\ .. 0�� IMF 2 \ Partial Cloverleaf A 1111MMEMMEMEMEM M MIA , ,,, , ...�� ®C.. . CloverleafPartial - ®C... .. Displaced Left Turn Diverging Diamond ,, Interchange ® �� Capacity Analysis for Planning of Junctions Executive PM Continuous Green T W Continuous Green T N Signalized Restricted Crossing U- �\Turn E-W Fair Fair Poor Displaced Left Turn \\\\Continuous Poor Poor Fair Green T S Poor Poor Fair Median U-Turn N-S Fair Fair Poor Median U-Turn E-W Fair Fair Poor Partial Displaced Left Turn N-S Poor Poor Fair P a r t i a I D 1 s p I a c e d L e ft T u r n E - W !&\� WINH m = Poor Poor Fair Executive PM Summary Report - Page 1 of 2 Project Name: Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study Project Number: D3191200 Location: Collier County, FL Date: September 4, 2020 Number of Intersection Legs: Major Street Direction East-West Volume— Traffic • Volume (Veh/hr) Percent (%) U-Turn Left Thru Right Heavy Vehicles Volume Growth Eastbound 2 12 3980 0 4.53% 2.63% Westbound 0 0 1690 126 5.71 % 2.63% Southbound 0 0 0 19 12.20% 1.58% Northbound 0 0 0 1 0.00% 0.00% Adjustment Factor 0.80 0.95 0.85 0.80 0.95 0.85 Suggested Truck to PCE Factor Suggested = 2.00 2.00 FDOT Context Zone C4-General Urban Residential Critical Lane Volume Threshold 2-phase signal Suggested = 1800 1800 3-phase signal Suggested = 1750 1750 4-phase signal Suggested = 1700 1700 Summary Report - Page 2 of 2 TYPE OF INTERSECTION #N/A Overall v/c Ratio 0.00 V/C Ranking 1 Multimodal Score #N/A Pedestrian Bicycle Transit Accommodation Accommodation Accommodatio #N/A #N/A #N/A Continuous Green T W 0.01 2 1.5 Poor EW Poor Fair Continuous Green T N 0.36 3 1.5 Poor Poor Fair bignalizea Kestrictedrossing - 1 urn 0.79 4 3.1 Fair Fair Displaced Left Turn 0.80 5 2.4 Poor Poor Fair Continuous Green T S 0.81 6 1.5 Poor Poor Fair Median U-Turn N-S 0.81 6 3.1 Fair Fair Poor Median U-Turn E-W 0.81 6 3.1 Fair Fair Poor Partial Displaced Left Turn N-S 0.82 9 2.4 Poor Poor Fair Partial Displaced Left Turn E-W 0.82 9 2.4 Poor Poor Fair Executive PM Project Name: Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Stud Project Number: D3191200 Location: Collier County, FL Date: September 4, 2020 Number of Intersection Legs: Major Street Direction: East-West Traffic Volume Demand Volume (Veh/hr) Percent (%) U-Turn 11 Left *1 Thru 1 Right f* Heavy Vehicles Volume Growth Eastbound 2 12 3980 0 4.53% 2.63% Westbound 0 0 1690 126 5.71% 2.63% Southbound 0 0 0 19 12.20% 1.58% Northbound 0 0 0 1 0.00% 0.00% Adjustment Factor0.80 Factor 0.95 0.85 0.80 0.95 T 0.85 Suggested Truck to PCE Factor Suggested = 2.00 2.00 FDOT Context Zone C4-General Urban Residential Critical Lane Volume Threshold 2-phase signal Suggested = 1800 1800 3-phase signal Suggested = 1750 1750 4-phase signal Suggested = 1700 1700 Executive PM Number of Lanes TYPE OF for Non -roundabout Intersections OQQQOQQQOQQ�OQQ� � I/QQQ I/QQQ I/Q©� I/Q©Q Two-Way Stop Control I/QQQ I/QQQ I/Q©� I/Q©Q ■�►'•7I/QQQ I/QQQ I/Q©� I/Q©Q � I/QQQ I/QQQ I/Q©� I/Q©Q Continuous Green T ®IIQQIIIIIIQQIIQII�IIIIIIII ®IIIII/II II QI/ Q II QQII IIII ©Q ®IIIIQaIIQQIIIIIPAVPAV IQIIQ A/Q/QIII/I/III/I/QaI/QQII Quadrant RoadwayPartial ® I/QQa II I/QQa I/QQQ ®IIII Q� II QQQ II QQQ II Q00 �7I/QQQ I/QQQ I/Q0� III/00 Displaced Left Turn Q�7I/QQQ I/QQQ I/Q©� I/Q©Q • EWE I/QQQ I/QQQ I/QQQ I/QQQ ® QQQQQQQQ I/I/I/a I/I/I/Q ■u7IIIIIIQIIIIII000QQQQQQ Unsignalized Restricted Crossing U-® Turn QQQQQQQa I/I/I/Q I/I/I/Q IIIQIIIQQQQQQQQQ Median U-Turn ® Q I/QQQ I/QQ II II QQ I/ I/QQ ■u7 IIII QQ IIII QQQ I/ QQQ I/ QQ Partial Median U-Turn ® QI/QQQI/QQ I/QQa I/QQQ Qom■ I/QQQ I/QQQQ II ©QQ II ©Q Number of Lanes for Interchanges TYPE OF INTERCHANGE . ��QQQ�QQQ�Q©QQQ©Q II/QQQ II/QQQ I/Q©Q I/Q©Q Partial Cloverleaf A IIQI/QIIQI/QI/II©I/I/I/DII Partial Cloverleaf B ®I/Q®I/Q®I/QI/Q I/QI/Q I/Q I/Q I/Q I/Q I/Q©Q I/Q©Q Displaced -ft Turn I/QQQI/Q®I/QQQI/Q©Q II QQQ II QQQ II Q©Q II Q©Q Diverging Diamond Interchange ®II®II®I/QI/QI/QI/Q I/Q I/Q I/Q I/Q I/Q©Q I/Q©Q I/Q®I/Q®I/Q©QI/Q©Q I/QQQ I/QQQ I/Q©Q I/Q©Q Executive PM Results for Non -roundabout Intersections Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 4 Zone 5 ' Overall TYPE OF INTERSECTION (North) (South) (West) (Center) v1c Ratio �m �� mm mm �_A m = = mm mmAll-Way m Two -Way Stop Control Stop Control Continuous Green T E p\\�\�t�\�� Quadrant Roadway PIA MENIEN MPFA- mm m ® NEMEM \� 81\e Displaced Left Turn 0® \ Signalized Restricted Crossing U-Turn \ �� 0\ Unsignalized Restricted Crossing U-Turn. O\M0 OO U-Turn \Median MEMBERS Partial Median U.-Turn INIAW111-0 111\, Executive PM Detailed Report - Page 4 of 4 Results for Interchanges Zone 1 Zone 2 (Lt Zone 3 Zone 4 Zone 5 (Lt Zone 6 Ratio E ®®®®®®®®®®®® aw"mmom Fair Partial Cloverleaf A MM M 'PAP M M M M I PAP' M 'PAP M M M =I \\\\\\\\\'\'\\\\\,\\\ \ MWERS KIM Diverging Diamond V Interchange Executive PM Florida Department of Transportation Intersection Control Evaluation Form 750-010-30 Intersection Control Evaluation (ICE) Form Stage 1: Screening To fulfill the requirements of Stage 1 (Screening) of FDOT's ICE procedures, complete the following form and append all supporting documentation. Completed forms can be submitted to the District Traffic Operations Engineer (DTOE) and District Design Engineer (DDE) for the project's approval. Project Name Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study FDOT Project # Date 01/16/20 Submitted By Robert Grubel Agency/Companyl Jacobs Engineering, Inc. I Emaill Robert.Grubel@jacobs.com FDOT Context Classification I C4 - Urban General I FDOT Districtl District 1 1 Countyl Collier Project Locality (City/Town/Village) Collier County I Project Typel Corridor Improvement Project The 2018 AUIR projects the intersection of Livingston Road and Immokalee Road to be deficient by 2023 and Project Purpose (What Immokalee Road from I-75 to Logan Boulevard to be deficient by 2026. is the catalyst for this project and why is it being undertaken?) Project Setting Description The Northeast corner is Residential. The Northwest corner contains a Retention pond and Residential. The (Describe the area surrounding the Southwest corner is Residential. The Southeast contains a Pet market and Staples. intersection ) Note: Westbound multiuse path is separated from the road by the canal, along the north of the canal. Multimodal Context Sidewalk connectivity exists along Immokalee Road to the south, and is along the east and west sides of (Describe the pedestrian, bicycle, and transit Logan Boulevard to the north and south of the intersection. There is a bike lane only on Logan Boulevard activity in the area and the potential for travelling northbound to the south of the intersection. There is a multiuse path along Logan to the south of the activity based on surrounding land uses and intersection travelling southbound. development patterns ) Major Street Information Route #: CR 846 1 Route Name(s)l Immokalee Road I Milepost Existing Control Type Signal Existing AADT1 46,200 Design Year AADT 1 74,900 Design Vehicle Interstate Semitrailer (WB-62) I Control Vehiciel Interstate Semitrailer (WB-62) Primary Functional Classification Urban Principal Arterial Design Speed (mph) 45 Secondary Functional Classification (if app.)i Target Speed (mph) [if app.] 45 Direction Eastbound Number of Lanes Study Period #1 Traffic Volumes Study Period #2 Traffic Volumes Sidewalks along One side of the approach Left -Turn 2 �* Crosswalk on Approach? Yes Left -Through 0 Weekday AM Peak Weekday PM Peak o On -Street Bike Facilities? No Through 3 Left 289 Left 247 Q Multi -Use Path? No Left -Through -Right 0 Through 2,037 Through 3,320 Scheduled Bus Service? Yes Through -Right 0 Right 255 Right 411 Bus Stop on Approach? Yes Right -Turn 1 Daily Truck % 7.9% Direction Westbound Number of Lanes Study Period #1 Traffic Volumes Study Period #2 Traffic Volumes Sidewalks along: One side of the approach Left -Turn 2 Crosswalk on Approach? Yes Left -Through 0 Weekday AM Peak Weekday PM Peak o On -Street Bike Facilities? No Through 3 Left 449 Left 639 Q Multi -Use Path? Yes Left -Through -Right 0 Through 4,077 Through 1,594 Scheduled Bus Service? Yes Through -Right 0 Right 194 Right 90 Bus Stop on Approach? No Right-Turril 1 Daily Truck %1 5.5% Logan Blvd Page 1 of 4 FDOT ICE: Stage 1 Minor Street Information Route #: 1 Route Name(s)l Logan Blvd Milepost (if app.) Existing Control Typel Signal Existing AADT 12,300 Design Year AADTJ 27,200 Design Vehicle I Interstate Semitrailer (WB-62) Control Vehiclel Interstate Semitrailer (WB-62) Primary Functional Classificationi Urban Major Collector Design Speed (mph)l 45 Secondary Functional Classification (if app.)i Urban Minor Arterial Target Speed (mph) [if app.]l 45 Direction Northbound Number of Lanes Study Period #1 Traffic Volumes Study Period #2 Traffic Volumes Sidewalks along: Both sides of the approach Left -Turn 2 �* Crosswalk on Approach? Yes Left -Through 0 Weekday AM Peak Weekday PM Peak o On -Street Bike Facilities? No Through 2 Left 437 Left 288 Multi -Use Path. No Left -Through -Right 0 Through 148 Through 340 Scheduled Bus Service? Yes Through-Rightl 0 Right 272 Right 819 Bus Stop on Approach? Yes Right-Tuml 1 Daily Truck % 5.5% Direction Southbound Number of Lanes Study Period #1 Traffic Volumes Study Period #2 Traffic Volumes Sidewalks along: Both sides of the approach Left -Turn 1 Crosswalk on Approach? Yes Left -Through 0 Weekday AM Peak Weekday PM Peak o On -Street Bike Facilities? No Through 1 Left 245 Left 177 Q Multi -Use Path? No Left -Through -Right 0 Throughl 268 Through 392 Scheduled Bus Service? Yes Through -Right 0 Rightl 462 Right 169 Bus Stop on Approach? Yes Right -Turn 1 Daily Truck % 4.4% Direction Number of Lanes Study Period #1 Traffic Volumes Study Period #2 Traffic Volumes Sidewalks along: Left -Turn Crosswalk on Approach? Left -Through Weekday AM Peak Weekday PM Peak o On -Street Bike Facilities? Through Left Left Q Multi -Use Path? Left -Through -Right Through Through Scheduled Bus Service? Through-Rightl I Right Right Bus Stop on Approach? Right-Turni I Daily Truck 11 Crash History (Existing Intersections Only) 11 Ippend the most recent five -years of crash data for the intersection from the CAR System. If the crash data evidences any issues relating to safety 1IIerformance, discuss briefly here: Within the last five years (2014-2018), there were approximatley 125 crashes reported, 55 of which were not reported short form. 3 were identified as severe, hit fixed object, pedestrian, and rear end. Excluding short form crash reports, the crash severity included 0- Fatal, 3- Major Injury, 8-Minor Injury, 15 Possible Injury, and 29-Property Damage. The 55 crash types are broken down by: 7-Angle, 1-Bike, 4-Hit Fixed Object, 6-Left Turn, 1-Pedestrian, 29-Rear End, 1-Run Off Road, and 6-Sideswipe. Logan Blvd Page 2 of 4 FDOT ICE: Stage 1 Control Strategy Evaluation Provide a brief justification as to why each of the following control strategies should be advanced or not. Justification should consider potential environmental impacts. CAP-X Outputs V/C Ratio Justification Weekday AM Weekday PM Multimodal SPICE Strategy to Be Control Strategy Peak Peak Score Ranking Advanced? Currently a signalized intersection. Two -Way Stop- N/A N/A N/A N/A No Controlled Currently a signalized intersection. All -Way Stop N/A N/A N/A N/A No Controlled Signalized 1.55 1.60 2.4 4 Yes Control Traffic volumes too high for efficient roundabout Roundabout 60.99 22.97 2.8 6 No operation. Median U-Turn 1.43 1.38 3.1 1 Yes RCUT 1.60 1.71 3.1 7 Yes (Signalized) Currently a signalized intersection. RCUT N/A NIA N/A N/A No (Unsignalized) Jughandle 2 Yes Displaced Left- 1.06 1.04 2.4 3 Yes Turn Currently a 4-Leg intersection. Continuous N/A N/A N/A N/A No Green Tee Not enough available space. Quadrant 1.74 1.57 2.2 No Roadway Diverging Diamond 0.61 0.86 3.3 Yes Interchange N-S Single Point N-S 0.62 0.89 2.4 Yes Logan Blvd Page 3 of 4 FDOT ICE: Stage 1 Resolution To be filled out by FDOT District Traffic Operations Engineer and District Design Engineer Project Determination Multiple Viable Alternatives Identified: Continue to Stage 2 Comments DTOE Name Signature Date DDE Name Signature Date Logan Blvd Page 4 of 4 Input Worksheet 1 Project Name: Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Stud Project Number: D3191200 Location Collier County, FL Date January 16, 2020 Number of Intersection Legs Major Street Direction East-West VolumeTraffic • Volume (Veh/hr) Percent (%) U-Turn Left Thru Right Heavy Vehicles Volume Growth Eastbound 61 228 2037 255 11.14% 2.96% 5 444 4077 194 5.72% 2.63% 0 245 268 462 3.13% 3.36% 0 437 148 272 8.56% 3.36% Westbound Southbound Northbound Adjustment Factor 0.80 0.95 0.85 Suggested 0.80 0.95 0.85 Truck to PCE Factor Suggested = 2.00 2.00 FDOT Context Zone C4-General Urban Residential Critical Lane Volume Threshold 2-phase signal Suggested = 1800 1800 3-phase signal Suggested = 1750 1750 4-phase signal Suggested = 1700 1700 Equivalent•Volume Volume (Veh/hr) U-Turn Left Thru Right Eastbound 70 5 0 0 261 2331 292 4424 210 286 492 Westbound 482 Southbound 261 Northbound 490 166 305 Left -Turn Adjustment Factoi Conversion of left -turning vehicles to equivalent through vehicles Right -turn Adjustment Factoi Conversion of right -turning vehicles to equivalent through vehicles U-turn Adjustment Factoi Conversion of U-turning vehicles to equivalent through vehicles Truck to PCE Factor 1 truck = X Passenger Car Equivalents Critical Lane Volume Sum Limi Saturation Value for Critical Lane Volume Sum at an intersection Capacity Analysis for Planning of Junctions Logan AM Capacity. • of • Step 2A: Base Conditions Analysis Traffic Signal Number of Lanes for Existing Configuration (Can be edited in "3- Alt Nurn Lanes Input" as needed) Northbound pSouthbounTdEastbound Westbound TYPE OF INTERSECTION SheetU L T R LTRTraffic Signal FULL 2 2 12 3 1 2 3 1 Results for Existing Configuration TYPE OF Zone 1 (North) zone 2 (south) Zone 3 (East) Zone 4 (west) zones (center) INTERSECTION Sheet CLV VIC CLV VIC CLV VIC CLV VIC CLV VIC Traffic Signal FULL Existing Configuration Results Overall v/c Pedestrian Bicycle Transit Ratio Accommodation Poor Accommodation Puur Accommodation Fair Step 2B: Alternative Selection Rankings Inclusion Yes/No Comment Continue to Step 3 Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study Project Name: D3191200 Project Number: Collier County, FL Location: January 16, 2020 Date: Major Street East-West Direction At -Grade Non -Roundabout Intersections? Yes Traffic Signal Yes Two -Way Stop Control No Existing Signal All -Way Stop Control No Existing Signal Continuous Green T No 4 Leg Intersection Quadrant Roadway S-W No Residential Present in Quadrant N-E No Residential Present in Quadrant S-E No Commercial Present in Quadrant N-W No lion Pond and residential Present in Qu Partial Displaced Left Turn Yes Displaced Left Turn Yes Signalized Restricted Crossing U-Turn Yes Unsignalized Restricted Crossing U-Turn No Existing Signal Median U-Turn Yes Partial Median U-Turn Yes Roundabouts? No lumes too high for efficient roundabout 50 ICD Miniroundabout 75 CD Miniroundaobut 1x1 1 NS x 2EW 2NS x 1EW 2x2 Grade Separated Interchanges? Yes Diamond No Partial Cloverleaf A No Partial Cloverleaf B No Displaced Left Turn Interchange Yes Diverging Diamond Interchange Yes Single Point Yes Logan AM Input Worksheet 2 Input Worksheet 2 Number of Lanes for Non -roundabout Intersections Quadrant Roadway ®r©©or000r©©or©©n '• ®UUHE00006UU06UU0 ® ArBum Pon=aII©0©II©n Input Worksheet 2 Number TYPE OF INTERCHANGE of Lanes for Interchanges Di.pla-cl Left Turn Immokelee Road Corridor Congestion Study Collier County, FL Volume Echo with Shared Lane Adjustment for Non -roundabout Intersections ®MAMM MUM= PAv M®IMIBM ®MAMM IBM= PAv M®IMIBM ®MAMM IBM=ROME IBM ®PIVAMM®' IBM=ROME IBM ® PIVAMM PIAV ISO= PIVAO®PIVA 12=0 ®PIVAMOM PIVAMMPIAV PIVAMMPIVA PIVAMMO ® MAMBO MUMMERS RVA RAV ®IM RVA MMIS Quadrant Roadway ® PIAV mmm PIAV WIM0 RAV M®IM RAVM= ® NO NE = RVAMMO RVA M®IM IVAM= ® RVA MMM RVA MIMM RU PE E=MUM= ®MUM=M M=ROME =PIVARVA= ®MUM= MUM=ROME MUM= ®PIVAMMMIBM=ROM®=PIVAMMM ®��112-0��112-0mM®0©MEM ®NONE NO0RVARVARVA0mM®M©mmm ®0PIAVmmn PIAVIM0PIAV PAV®0NOPIVA=IM ® RVARVAMM NONE= m MA®=© PIVAMM M®IM RAV M=M Capacity Analysis for Planning of Junctions Logan AM Capacity Analysis for Planning of Junctions Logan AM Results Worksheet Overall me 2 \\\\\\ '� Results for Interchanges TYPE OF INTERCHANGE Ratio E E ®®®®®®®®®®®® M PIAVM'\\� ZIA WNESSIM Partial Cloverleaf A EEEMENDisplaced Partial Cloverleaf .®C...0,.. Left Turn Capacity Analysis for Planning of Junctions Logan AM TYPE OF • Ranking Score Accommodations Accommodations Accommodations Diverging Diamond Interchange N-S �> >�• 1 3.3 Fair Fair Fair Single Point N-S 2 2.4 Poor Poor Fair Displaced Left Turn 3 2.4 Poor Poor Fair Partial Displaced Left Turn N-S 4 2.4 Poor Poor Fair Displaced Left Turn (Interchange) E �.., 5 2.4 Poor Poor Fair W Single Point E-W 6 2.4 Poor Poor Fair Partial Displaced Left Turn E-W ^: 7 2.4 Poor Poor Fair Partial Median U-Turn N-S 8 3.1 Fair Fair Poor Diverging Diamond Interchange E- 9 3.3 Fair Fair Fair W Median U-Turn E-W 10 3.1 Fair Fair Poor Logan AM Summary Report - Page 1 of 2 Project Name: Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study Project Number: D3191200 Location: Collier County, FL Date: January 16, 2020 Number of Intersection Legs: Major Street Direction East-West Volume— Traffic • Volume (Veh/hr) Percent (%) U-Turn Left Thru Right Heavy Vehicles Volume Growth Eastbound 61 228 2037 255 11.14% 2.96% Westbound 5 444 4077 194 5.72% 2.63% Southbound 0 245 268 462 3.13% 3.36% Northbound 0 437 148 272 8.56% 3.36% Adjustment Factor 0.80 0.95 0.85 0.80 0.95 0.85 Suggested Truck to PCE Factor Suggested = 2.00 2.00 FDOT Context Zone C4-General Urban Residential Critical Lane Volume Threshold 2-phase signal Suggested = 1800 1800 3-phase signal Suggested = 1750 1750 4-phase signal Suggested = 1700 1700 Summary Report - Page 2 of 2 TYPE OF INTERSECTION Diverging Diamond Interchange N-S Overall v/c Ratio 0.61 V/C Ranking 1 Multimodal Score 3.3 Pedestrian Bicycle Transit Accommodation Accommodation Accommodatio Fair Fair Fair Single Point N-S 0.62 2 2.4 Poor Poor Fair Displaced Left Turn 1.06 3 2.4 Poor Poor Fair Partial Displaced Left Turn N-S 1.17 4 2.4 Poor Poor Fair Displaced Left Turn (Interchange) E-W 1.20 5 2.4 Poor Poor Fair Single Point E-W 1.23 6 2.4 Poor Poor Fair Partial Displaced Left Turn E-W 1.24 7 2.4 Poor Poor Fair Partial Median U-Turn N-S 1.26 8 3.1 Fair Fair Poor Diverging Diamond Interchange E-W 1.39 9 3.3 Fair Fair Fair Median U-Turn E-W 1.43 10 3.1 Fair Fair Poor Logan AM Project Name: Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Stud Project Number: D3191200 Location: Collier County, FL Date: January 16, 2020 Number of Intersection Legs: Major Street Direction: East-West Traffic Volume Demand Volume (Veh/hr) Percent (%) U-Turn 11 Left *1 Thru 1 Right f* Heavy Vehicles Volume Growth Eastbound 61 228 2037 255 11.14% 2.96% Westbound 5 444 4077 194 5.72% 2.63% Southbound 0 245 268 462 3.13% 3.36% Northbound 0 437 148 272 8.56% 3.36% Adjustment Factor0.80 Factor 0.95 0.85 0.80 0.95 T 0.85 Suggested Truck to PCE Factor Suggested = 2.00 2.00 FDOT Context Zone C4-General Urban Residential Critical Lane Volume Threshold 2-phase signal Suggested = 1800 1800 3-phase signal Suggested = 1750 1750 4-phase signal Suggested = 1700 1700 Logan AM Number of Lanes TYPE OF for Non -roundabout Intersections DOQQDOQQDOQQDOQQ � I/QQQ I/QQQ I/Q©Q I/Q©Q Two-Way Stop Control I/Q©Q I/QQQ II©©Q I/Q©Q ■�►'•7I/QQQ I/QQQ I/Q©Q I/Q©Q � I/QQQ I/QQQ I/Q©Q I/Q©Q Continuous Green T ®IIQQIIIIIIQQIIQIIQIIIIIIII ®IIIII/II II QI/ Q II QQII IIII ©Q ®IIIIQQIIQQIIIIIPAVPAV IQIIQ A/Q/QIII/I/III/I/QQI/QQII Quadrant RoadwayPartial ® I/QQa II I/QQa I/QQQ ®IIII Q� II QQQ II QQQ II QQQ �7II/QQQ I/QQQ I/QQQ III/QQ Displaced -ft Turn ® I/QQQ I/QQQ I/QQQ I/QQQ Q�7II/QQQ I/QQQ I/Q©Q I/Q©Q • 0MI/QQQ I/QQQ I/QQQ I/QQQ ® QQQQQQQQ I/I/I/Q I/I/I/Q ■►'�7IIIIIIQIIIII000QQQQQQ Unsignalized Restricted Crossing U-® Turn QQQQQQQQ I/I/I/Q I/I/I/Q ■ ►'�7IIIIIIQIIIIII000QQQQQQ Median U-Turn ® Q I/QQQ I/QQ II II QQ I/ I/QQ ■ u7IIIIQQIIII000I/QQQI/QQ Partial Median U-Turn ® QI/QQQI/QQ I/QQQ I/QQQ M I/QQQ I/QQQQ I/QQQ I/QQ Number of Lanes for Interchanges TYPE OF INTERCHANGE ®D�QQD�QQD�QQD�QQ . ��QQQ�QQQ�Q©QQQ©Q II/QQQ II/QQQ I/Q©Q I/Q©Q Partial Cloverleaf A IIQI/QIIQI/QI/II©I/I/I/DII Partial Cloverleaf B ®I/Q®I/Q®I/QI/QI/QI/O I/Q I/Q I/Q I/Q I/QQQ I/QQQ Displaced -ft Turn I/QQQI/Q®II Una I/QQQ IIQQQIIQQQ/QQQ/QQQ Diverging Diamond Interchange ®II®II®I/QI/QI/QI/Q I/ Q I/Q I/ Q I/Q I/QQQ I/QQQ I/Q® I/Q® I/QQQ I/QQQ I/QQQ I/QQQ I/QQQ I/QQQ Logan AM Results for Non -roundabout Intersections Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 4 Zone 5 ' Overall TYPE OF INTERSECTION mmmmm�mm� (North) (South) (West) (Center) v1c III Ratio �m mmmmmmmm !` m = = Two -Way Stop Control �mmmmmmmm1\AR� \All -Way Stop Control Continuous Green T MAP Quadrant Roadway 'PAP ® \\ m �� MEN Displaced Left Turn ,.<. \Signalized NEMEN DisplacedPartial - Restricted Crossing U-Turn \ �� ®o o \\ Unsignalized Restricted Crossing U-Turn ® \ \\ \M Median U-Turn Partial Median U.-Turn®10, . 0 Mma ®��4, Logan AM Detailed Report - Page 4 of 4 Results for Interchanges Zone 1 Zone 2 (Lt Zone 3 Zone 4 Zone 5 (Lt Zone 6 Ratio E V*A\, Fair Partial Cloverleaf A Partial Cloverleaf B "gap= Displaced Left Turn 15461 PP Diverging DiamondInterchange 1075 ® �V S �&&rp , . 1223 Logan AM Input Worksheet 1 Project Name: Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Stud Project Number: D3191200 Location Collier County, FL Date January 16, 2020 Number of Intersection Legs Major Street Direction East-West VolumeTraffic • Volume (Veh/hr) Percent (%) U-Turn Left Thru Right Heavy Vehicles Volume Growth Eastbound 4 243 3320 411 4.73% 2.96% 32 607 1594 90 5.26% 2.63% 0 177 392 169 5.66% 3.36% 47 241 340 819 2.51 % 3.36% Westbound Southbound Northbound Adjustment Factor 0.80 0.95 0.85 Suggested 0.80 0.95 0.85 Truck to PCE Factor Suggested = 2.00 2.00 FDOT Context Zone C4-General Urban Residential Critical Lane Volume Threshold 2-phase signal Suggested = 1800 1800 3-phase signal Suggested = 1750 1750 4-phase signal Suggested = 1700 1700 Equivalent•Volume Volume (Veh/hr) U-Turn Left Thru Right Eastbound 4 35 0 50 262 3580 443 1722 97 428 185 Westbound 656 Southbound 193 Northbound 255 360 868 Left -Turn Adjustment Factoi Conversion of left -turning vehicles to equivalent through vehicles Right -turn Adjustment Factoi Conversion of right -turning vehicles to equivalent through vehicles U-turn Adjustment Factoi Conversion of U-turning vehicles to equivalent through vehicles Truck to PCE Factor 1 truck = X Passenger Car Equivalents Critical Lane Volume Sum Limi Saturation Value for Critical Lane Volume Sum at an intersection Capacity Analysis for Planning of Junctions Logan PM Capacity. • of • Step 2A: Base Conditions Analysis Traffic Signal Number of Lanes for Existing Configuration (Can be edited in "3- Alt Nurn Lanes Input" as needed) Northbound pSouthbounTdEastbound Westbound TYPE OF INTERSECTION SheetU L T R LTRTraffic Signal FULL 2 2 12 3 1 2 3 1 Results for Existing Configuration TYPE OF Zone 1 (North) Zone 2 (south) Zone 3 (East) INTERSECTION Sheet CLV VIC CLV VIC CLV VIC Zone a (west) zones (center) CLV VIC CLV VIC Traffic Signal FULL -- -- -- -- - R a -- -- Existing Configuration Results Overall v/c Pedestrian Bicycle o Poor Ratio Accommodation Accommodation Transit Poor Fair Accommodation Step 2B: Alternative Selection Rankings Inclusion Yes/No Comment Continue to Step 3 Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study Project Name: D3191200 Project Number: Collier County, FL Location: January 16, 2020 Date: Major Street East-West Direction At -Grade Non -Roundabout Intersections? Yes Traffic Signal Yes Two -Way Stop Control No Existing Signal All -Way Stop Control No Existing Signal Continuous Green T No 4 Leg Intersection Quadrant Roadway S-W No Residential Present in Quadrant N-E No Residential Present in Quadrant S-E No Commercial Present in Quadrant N-W No lion Pond and residential Present in Qu Partial Displaced Left Turn Yes Displaced Left Turn Yes Signalized Restricted Crossing U-Turn Yes Unsignalized Restricted Crossing U-Turn Yes Existing Signal Median U-Turn Yes Partial Median U-Turn Yes Roundabouts? No lumes too high for efficient roundabout 50 ICD Miniroundabout 75 CD Miniroundaobut 1x1 1 NS x 2EW 2NS x 1EW 2x2 Grade Separated Interchanges? Yes Diamond No No Available Space Partial Cloverleaf A No No Available Space Partial Cloverleaf B No No Available Space Displaced Left Turn Interchange Yes Diverging Diamond Interchange Yes Single Point Yes Logan PM Input Worksheet 2 Input Worksheet 2 Number of Lanes for Non -roundabout Intersections ®00000000©©��©0 ®��©00000 0000 0©00 Quadrant Roadway ®o©©000000©©oo©©o •-- • ®00©0000000000000 ®0000000000©000©0 '• ®UUHE000Q600Q600O ®0000000000©000©0 ®o©©0000000©000©o Input Worksheet 2 Number TYPE OF INTERCHANGE of Lanes for Interchanges ®� ©©0 0000©00©00 Di.pla-cl Left Turn Immokelee Road Corridor Congestion Study Collier County, FL Volume Echo with Shared Lane Adjustment for Non -roundabout Intersections ®1vAM MISO=P ME mIRM®W ®1vAM MPRO=P MEMOMAM®M ®1vAM MPRO=PEAME '' mMAM®W ®PIVAM MPRO� =NAME ' mPIVAM®M ®PIAV ®MPAv PIAV WMM PIAV MWO PIAV WWRAV ® PIVAMM PIAV PIVAOMM PIVAMEMPIVA PIVAM ®M ®RVA®PEAMREMERSRVARAV ®'OIIM®O Quadrant Roadway® ® PIAV®MM PIAV WMM PIAVME mPIAVM®W RVARVAMM PIVAOOMMEMO RVAM®W ®PIVA®MMPIVAOOMRVARVAE mRVAM®W ® PIVA®MM PIVAMMO PIVAME mPIVARVA®m ®PIAV ®MMPIAV MMMPRAMEMO10MEOW ® PIVA®MM PIVAMMO PIVAME mRVAM®0 ®MAMMMPRO PEAME ' mMAM®W ®I/I/IIMI/I/II0OMEEOWOKEN OMEEm®M®M ®mPIAVMM0 PIAVMM PIAVP EEO10 PIN®M ®RVARVAMMRVARVAMO0PIVA m®PIN®m ® mPAV MM 0PAv MM PIAV MEMO PIAV MEOW®PIVA®MMPIVAMMOnRVAE 'm®PAv®m Capacity Analysis for Planning of Junctions Logan PM Capacity Analysis for Planning of Junctions Logan PM Results Worksheet Overall me 2 \\\\\\ '� NMI-' Results for Interchanges TYPE OF INTERCHANGE Ratio E E ®®®®®®®®®®®® waaaamw ME= M M Partial Cloverleaf A 'PAP 'PAP 'PAP ®1APM. M... Eo��.. Partial . - ...4 ®... .. Displaced \,,,, . \\\\\\\\\ \ \ 586 0,331 \\\\\O\ \O\\O\\\ \ Diamond InterchangeDiverging �.. 10 Capacity Analysis for Planning of Junctions Logan PM TYPE OF INTERSECTION IUse! - Overall V/C Ratio \- � V/C Ranking Multimodal Score Pedestrian Accommodations Fair Bicycle Accommodations Fair Transit Accommodations Fair Single Point N-S AIM Left Turn IRWINDisplaced Partial Displaced Left Turn E-W 10, Poor Poor Fair Im Fair Fair Fair Single Point E-W Poor Poor Fair Partial Displaced Left Turn N NONNI Poor Poor Fair Median U-Turn N-S Fair Fair Poor Partial Median U-Turn N-S Fair Fair Poor Logan PM Summary Report - Page 1 of 2 Project Name: Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study Project Number: D3191200 Location: Collier County, FL Date: January 16, 2020 Number of Intersection Legs: Major Street Direction East-West Volume— Traffic • Volume (Veh/hr) Percent (%) U-Turn Left Thru Right Heavy Vehicles Volume Growth Eastbound 4 243 3320 411 4.73% 2.96% Westbound 32 607 1594 90 5.26% 2.63% Southbound 0 177 392 169 5.66% 3.36% Northbound 47 241 340 819 2.51 % 3.36% Adjustment Factor 0.80 0.95 0.85 0.80 0.95 0.85 Suggested Truck to PCE Factor Suggested = 2.00 2.00 FDOT Context Zone C4-General Urban Residential Critical Lane Volume Threshold 2-phase signal Suggested = 1800 1800 3-phase signal Suggested = 1750 1750 4-phase signal Suggested = 1700 1700 Summary Report - Page 2 of 2 TYPE OF INTERSECTION Diverging Diamond Interchange N-S Overall v/c Ratio 0.86 V/C Ranking 1 Multimodal Score 3.3 Pedestrian Bicycle Transit Accommodation Accommodation Accommodatio Fair Fair Fair Single Point N-S 0.89 2 2.4 Poor Poor Fair Displaced Left Turn 1.04 3 2.4 Poor Poor Fair Partial Displaced Left Turn E-W 1.18 4 2.4 Poor Poor Fair Displaced Left Turn (Interchange) E-W 1.21 5 2.4 Poor Poor Fair Diverging Diamond Interchange E-W 1.27 6 3.3 Fair Fair Fair Single Point E-W 1.27 6 2.4 Poor Poor Fair Partial Displaced Left Turn N-S 1.38 8 2.4 Poor Poor Fair Median U-Turn N-S 1.38 8 3.1 Fair Fair Poor Partial Median U-Turn N-S 1.43 10 3.1 Fair Fair Poor Logan PM Project Name: Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Stud Project Number: D3191200 Location: Collier County, FL Date: January 16, 2020 Number of Intersection Legs: Major Street Direction: East-West Traffic Volume Demand Volume (Veh/hr) Percent (%) U-Turn 11 Left *1 Thru 1 Right f* Heavy Vehicles Volume Growth Eastbound 4 243 3320 411 4.73% 2.96% Westbound 32 607 1594 90 5.26% 2.63% Southbound 0 177 392 169 5.66% 3.36% Northbound 47 241 340 819 2.51% 3.36% Adjustment Factor0.80 Factor 0.95 0.85 0.80 0.95 T 0.85 Suggested Truck to PCE Factor Suggested = 2.00 2.00 FDOT Context Zone C4-General Urban Residential Critical Lane Volume Threshold 2-phase signal Suggested = 1800 1800 3-phase signal Suggested = 1750 1750 4-phase signal Suggested = 1700 1700 Logan PM Number of Lanes TYPE OF for Non -roundabout Intersections DOQQDOQQDOQQDOQQ � I/QQQ I/QQQ I/Q©Q I/Q©Q Two-Way Stop Control I/Q©Q I/QQQ II ©©Q II ©©Q ■�►'•7I/QQQ I/QQQ I/Q©Q I/Q©Q � I/QQQ I/QQQ I/Q©Q I/Q©Q Continuous Green T ®IIQQIIIIIIQQIIQIIQIIIIIIII ®IIIII/II II QI/ Q II QQII IIII ©Q ®IIIIQQIIQQIIIIIPAVPAV IQIIQ A/Q/QIII/I/III/I/QQI/QQII Quadrant RoadwayPartial ® I/QQa II I/QQa I/QQQ ®IIII Q� II QQQ II QQQ II QQQ �7II/QQQ I/QQQ I/QQQ III/QQ Displaced -ft Turn ® I/QQQ I/QQQ I/QQQ I/QQQ Q�7II/QQQ I/QQQ I/Q©Q I/Q©Q • 0MI/QQQ I/QQQ I/QQQ I/QQQ ® QQQQQQQQ I/I/I/Q I/I/I/Q ■►'�7IIIIIIQIIIII000QQQQQQ Unsignalized Restricted Crossing U-® Turn QQQQQQQQ I/I/I/Q I/I/I/Q ■ ►'�7IIIIIIQIIIIII000QQQQQQ Median U-Turn ® Q I/QQQ I/QQ II II QQ I/ I/QQ ■ u7IIIIQQIIII000I/QQQI/QQ Partial Median U-Turn ® QI/QQQI/QQ I/QQQ I/QQQ M I/QQQ I/QQQQ I/QQQ I/QQ Number of Lanes for Interchanges TYPE OF INTERCHANGE ®D�QQD�QQD�QQD�QQ . ��QQQ�QQQ�Q©QQQ©Q II/QQQ II/QQQ I/Q©Q I/Q©Q Partial Cloverleaf A IIQI/QIIQI/QI/II©I/I/I/DII Partial Cloverleaf B ®I/Q®I/Q®I/QI/QI/QI/O I/Q I/Q I/Q I/Q I/QQQ I/QQQ Displaced -ft Turn I/QQQI/Q®II Una I/QQQ IIQQQIIQQQ/QQQ/QQQ Diverging Diamond Interchange ®II®II®I/QI/QI/QI/Q I/ Q I/Q I/ Q I/Q I/QQQ I/QQQ I/Q® I/Q® I/QQQ I/QQQ I/QQQ I/QQQ I/QQQ I/QQQ Logan PM Results for Non -roundabout Intersections Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 4 Zone 5 ' Overall TYPE OF INTERSECTION mmmmm�mm� (North) (South) (West) (Center) v1c III Ratio �m Two -Way Stop Control All -Way Stop Control Continuous Green T PAP MRAP Quadrant Roadway Partial Displaced Left Turn MEMEM Displaced Left Turn ®191W\ \ Signalized Restricted Crossing U-Turn \ ` No 0\1 Unsignalized Restricted Crossing U-Turn �� NEEPartial .,.,, Median U-Turn Median U-Turn Logan PM Detailed Report - Page 4 of 4 Results for Interchanges Zone 1 Zone 2 (Lt Zone 3 Zone 4 Zone 5 (Lt Zone 6 Ratio E Fair Partial Cloverleaf A 'PAP M M Partial Cloverleaf B I'M* Displaced Left Turn 586 0.33 Diverging Diamond Interchange 1110 IN We\ Logan PM Appendix E Public Involvement Appendix E.1 Project Website Posted Material - Project Website Printout - Project Video Slides - Project Video Script - Access Management Slides - Livingston Road Sight Lines for Overpass - Online Project Survey 8/5/2021 Planning Projects and Studies Planning Projects and Studies I Collier County, FL Current Planning Studies Current Planning Studies Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study_ - the area includes Immokalee Road from Livingston Road to Logan Boulevard. The study includes evaluating intersection concepts alor the corridor to enhance traffic operations and safety concerns based on current and future t demands. The following link is to a video presentation explaining the recommendations: Immokalee Rd Corridor Video (More information on this study can be found below.) Wilson Blvd. Corridor Study- - The proposed project will expand the existing two-lane rural Wilson Boulevard from Golden Gate Boulevard to Immokalee Road to a four -lane urban roadway. Improvements over this 3.25-mile corridor include drainage, new sidewalks/bike paths, medians, one new signalized intersection, and upgrades to two existing signals, replacing an existing bridge, utility relocations, four new transit stop/shelter locations, and Right -of -Way acquisitions. (Information on this study can be found below.) Current - Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study Collier County is conducting the Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study along Immokalee Road from Livingston Road to Logan Boulevard. The study includes evaluating intersection concepts along the corridor to enhance traffic operations and safety concerns based on current and future travel demands. Project Video Nine intersections are being studied. The information below provides a brief summary of the proposed recommendations and conceptual graphics. A video has been developed that shows the recommended improvements along the corridor and provides animations to demonstrate how a vehicle moves through the more complicated intersections. We encourage you to watch the project video to better understand the recommendations and the concepts. Please click on the following link for a narrated presentation that further explains the recommended improvements at each intersection and other proposed improvements. Link to video: Immokalee Congestion Study Video You may fast forward the video to the intersection(s) that interests you. General Study Overview This section of Immokalee Road is constrained by development along both sides of the road as well the Cocohatchee Canal that runs along the north side. Therefore, simply widening the road is no longer feasible. This study considers alternative solutions including roadway improvements, intersection improvements, traffic signal coordination, and network improvement opportunities. • The Project Purpose is to analyze the existing and future traffic operations along Immokalee Road between Livingston Road and Logan Boulevard. • The Project Need is based on the anticipated traffic growth along the corridor. Today, the traffic volume along Immokalee Road is 43,400 vehicles per day and is quickly approaching the https://www.colliercountyfl.gov/your-government/divisions-s-zltransportation-planning/planning-studies 1/14 8/5/2021 Planning Projects and Studies I Collier County, FL roadway's capacity. This section of Immokalee Road will experience severe delays by 2040 if no improvements are made, as traffic volumes are expected to grow by 67% in 2040. • The Project Goal is to determine feasible corridor improvements that would efficiently and effectively accommodate the projected growth by reducing delay and congestion and improving overall corridor operations. The study is expected to be completed in September of 2021. Intersections Studied and Project Recommendations The study is making several recommendations for the corridor. The overall corridor improvement recommendation is to restripe the existing right -turn lane and shoulder area to a through/right-turn lane from Juliet Boulevard/Strand Boulevard to Logan Boulevard. Nine intersections are being studied along the corridor (labeled "A" through "I"). Please reference the project aerial with highlighted squares for the location of each intersection. The following summarizes the recommended solution for each intersection. A: Livingston Rd. — Convert to a Single Point Urban Interchange (SPUI) commonly known as an overpass. For this recommendation, there is no change to the traffic patterns on Immokalee Road, the only change is to Livingston Road. The recommendation is to bridge Livingston Road over Immokalee Road. The bridge is proposed as 4 lanes (2 lanes in each direction). An additional southbound left turn at Livingston Road is also proposed. Through traffic along Livingston Road would not be required to stop, improving the traffic operations at this intersection. This is similar to the intersection at Golden Gate Parkway and Airport Road, where Golden Gate Parkway goes over Airport Road. https://www.colliercountyfl.gov/your-government/divisions-s-zltransportation-planning/planning-studies 2/14 8/5/2021 Planning Projects and Studies I Collier County, FL B: Strand Blvd./Juliet Blvd. — Widen bridge along southbound side of intersection, add turn lanes and increase the length of the left turn lanes. • C and D: I-75 Interchange (Southbound and Northbound On/Off Ramps I-75) — Convert to a Diverging Diamond Interchange (DDI). For this recommendation traffic patterns will only change along Immokalee Road; there will be no change to the traffic pattern on I-75. Traffic on Immokalee Road will shift (or diverge) to the opposite side of the road as it passes https://www.colliercountyfl.gov/your-government/divisions-s-zltransportation-planning/planning-studies 3/14 8/5/2021 Planning Projects and Studies I Collier County, FL under I-75 (will be controlled by a traffic signal). A DDI configuration is unusual in that it requires traffic to briefly drive on the opposite side of the road (in this case while under I-75). Large overhead signs, barriers and/or pavement markings will be used to direct traffic. There are not many DDIs in operation in Florida but are becoming more popular as they are an innovative solution to reduce delay and increase mobility and safety. There is a fully operational DDI at I-75 and University Parkway in Sarasota. FDOT is currently constructing a DDI at the interchange of Colonial Boulevard and I-75 in Fort Myers. • E: Northbrooke Dr./Tarpon Bay Blvd. —Widen the bridge along the southbound side of the intersection, add turn lanes and increase the length of the left turn lanes. https://www.colliercountyfl.gov/your-government/divisions-s-zltransportation-planning/planning-studies 4/14 8/5/2021 Planning Projects and Studies I Collier County, FL • F: Oakes Blvd. — Restripe the existing lanes to add a through/right turn lane and increase the length of the left turn lanes • G: Valewood Dr. — Add a dedicated left turn lane. Restripe the existing through/left-turn lane to a through/right turn lane. https://www.colliercountyfl.gov/your-government/divisions-s-z/transportation-planning/planning-studies 5/14 8/5/2021 Planning Projects and Studies I Collier County, FL CA-C°__ I • H: Executive Dr. — No change is recommended. • I: Logan Blvd. — Reconstruct the intersection to include a Partial Displaced Left Turn (PDLT) also known as a Continuous Flow Intersection (CFI) along Immokalee Road. The PDLT reconfigures the roadway by allowing vehicles to cross to the left side of the roadway before the intersection, which allows for multiple traffic movements that are not possible at conventional https://www.colliercountyfl.gov/your-government/divisions-s-z/transportation-planning/planning-studies 6/14 8/5/2021 Planning Projects and Studies I Collier County, FL signalized intersections. This improvement will increase signal efficiency by allowing for longer green times at each leg of the intersection (you won't have to wait so long at a red light). Some of the recommended intersection solutions above are innovative for this area. To find out more about the intersections, see the conceptual designs and simulated animations demonstrating how a vehicle moves through the more complicated intersections, please view the following video: Immokalee Congestion Study Video The video is approximately 30 minutes long. If you prefer not to watch the entire video, it is bookmarked so that you can skip to the intersection(s) you are most concerned about. The study is expected to be completed in September 2021. Below are some specific frequently asked questions (FAQs) and answers related to the project and the concepts presented i. What section of Immokalee Road are you studying? The project study limits are along Immokalee Road from Livingston Road to Logan Boulevard, approximately two miles long. 2. Why is this study being performed? The purpose of this study is to analyze existing and future traffic conditions along this section of Immokalee Road and to model and project future traffic volumes. The goal of the study is to identify solutions that will accommodate future growth, as well as improve existing traffic operations. Alternative solutions including roadway improvements, intersection improvements, traffic signal https://www.colliercountyfl.gov/your-government/divisions-s-z/transportation-planning/planning-studies 7/14 8/5/2021 Planning Projects and Studies I Collier County, FL coordination, and overall network improvement opportunities are being considered. 3. What is a `Corridor Study' and what does that mean for the project process? Corridor Study — The corridor study is an analysis done to determine the need for a roadway improvement based on the existing corridor conditions, current and future land uses and projected traffic volumes to identify transportation -related problems and evaluate potential solutions. Stakeholders are engaged and a recommendation for the corridor with preferred alignments and conceptual designs of the improvements are developed. The process ends with the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) approving the preferred alternative for the corridor. Design — Following the corridor study, a design phase is completed. This step of the process starts with the results from the corridor study and builds upon that with detailed designs of the project such as the exact project specifications, cost estimates, permits, aesthetics (such as noise walls, landscaping, lighting, etc.) and a final set of construction plans. Public comments from the corridor study are communicated to the engineers as they design the construction plans. Stakeholders are engaged in this phase as design concepts are refined to become final construction plans. Right -of -Way — If the preferred alternative identified in the corridor study does not fit within the existing right-of-way footprint, the design is followed by a right-of-way acquisition phase in which land is purchased from property owners for the improvement. Construction — This phase consists of building the designed improvements. Stakeholders are engaged in the construction activities throughout the construction phase. 4. When would construction for these projects occur? If these recommendations move forward, the county will work towards funding (budgeting) them in the Collier County Capital Improvement Projects (CIP) plan. The current CIP includes design and construction funding for the intersection of Immokalee Road and Northbrooke Drive/Tarpon Bay Boulevard in Fiscal Year 2022. The following projects were identified in the Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan (https://www.colliermpo.org/Irtp/) as cost feasible for design and construction in the following time periods: • Livingston Road and Immokalee Road Intersection - between Fiscal Years 2026 and 2030 • I-75/Immokalee Road Interchange - between Fiscal Years 2026 and 2030 (in coordination with FDOT) • Immokalee Road and Logan Boulevard Intersection - between Fiscal Years 2031 and 2045 These timeframes are subject to change as funding and transportation needs change. Construction funding for the remaining intersection improvements have not been identified and are still in the planning phase. 5. Where can I take the survey? You can take the survey at the following link: Immokalee Congestion Study Survey Prior to taking the survey, we encourage you to watch the project video. The Public Involvement Survey has been extended until July 10. 2021. https://www.colliercountyfl.gov/your-government/divisions-s-zltransportation-planning/planning-studies 8/14 8/5/2021 Planning Projects and Studies I Collier County, FL 6. Will I be able to give input as each of the intersection improvements move forward into design and construction? Absolutely! Public involvement continues throughout all project phases including design and construction, to keep the public informed, seek input, and address public concerns. 7. Does my opinion really matter? Yes. Public participation is a critical part of all transportation planning studies. All comments, both verbal and written, merit serious consideration. All written comments become part of the public record and the final report which is presented to the Board of County Commissioner (BCC). The presentation date is tentatively scheduled for September 14, 2021. As part of the meeting presentation, members of the public will have the opportunity to vocalize their comments. 8. Have you examined other ideas for adding or improving more east and west roadways to relieve congestion along Immokalee Road? Yes, the county is planning to expand and extend Veterans Memorial Boulevard (two miles north of Immokalee Road) west to Old US 41. In addition, plans are underway to improve Vanderbilt Beach Road (two miles south of Immokalee Road) by widening it from US 41 to Airport Road, and by widening/extending it from Collier Boulevard to 16th Street NE. All proposed improvements would provide relief to Immokalee Road. These projects are currently in the design phase and funded for construction in FY2022-2023. For more information on these current transportation engineering projects please select the following link: https://www.colliercountyfl.gov/your- government/divisions-s-z/transportation-engineering-division/transportation-engineering= projects Collier County transportation staff, the Collier MPO, and FDOT continuously coordinate on the county's transportation network needs. The Collier MPO updates its Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) every five years to identify and prioritize roadway network improvements that provide the greatest benefit to our roadway network. 9. Are there an other studies to alleviate traffic associated with the I-75 and IminUalee Road interchange? Can Collier County add another interchange onto I-75 at either Veteran's Memorial Blvd. or Vanderbilt Beach Road (VBR)? • I-75 is an interstate highway system. Any changes to the highway or modifications to the interchanges require approval by the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) and Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and must be consistent with the Collier MPO adopted Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP). • The Collier MPO included a new partial interchange at I-75 and VBR as a need in their 2045 LRTP, however that project is not on the Cost Feasible List. This means that although the project is considered a transportation need, there is no funding to study, design or construct it by the year 2045. A new interchange at I-75 and Veteran's Memorial Blvd. is not included in the 2045 LRTP as a cost feasible project or as a need. Any new interchange must be consistent with the adopted LRTP and the FDOT. • The FDOT is conducting a study to evaluate the future needs of I-75 in Lee and Collier Counties, called the Southwest Connect I-75 South Corridor Study. The status and schedule of this study can be found at the following link: https://www.swflinterstates.comli75-south-corridor/ This FDOT study is evaluating strategies to improve both the mainline of I-75 as well as the https://www.colliercountyfl.gov/your-government/divisions-s-zltransportation-planning/planning-studies 9/14 8/5/2021 Planning Projects and Studies I Collier County, FL interchanges. The Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study is being coordinated with the FDOT Southwest Connect I-75 South Corridor Study. The FDOT study process is similar to the Collier County process and includes public meetings to evaluate proposed alternatives. The FDOT study schedule on their website indicates that the proposed alternatives public meeting will be during the spring of 2022 and the study is scheduled to be complete in the fall of 2023. If the FDOT study recommends consideration of a new interchange, the MPO would likely amend or update their LRTP to include when the lengthy Interchange Justification Report Process would be cost feasible and could begin. io. Who do I contact if I have questions on this study? Should you have any questions on this study, please contact the county project manager, Principal Planner Lorraine Lantz, AICP, at 239-252-5779 or at Lorraine.Lantz@ colliercountyfl.gov. Specific FAQs for the Livingston Road and Immokalee Road Intersection Recommendations i. Will a traffic signal be installed at Livingston Road and the north entrance to Carlton Lakes and Delasol? A traffic signal is not proposed at the intersection of Livingston Road and Carlton Lakes Boulevard/Delasol Lane as part of this study. In order for a traffic signal to be installed at an intersection, a traffic signal warrant analysis must be done to determine if it is justified. The analysis is based on FDOT criteria and existing traffic volumes. Both Carlton Lakes Boulevard and Delasol Lane are private roads that are not maintained by the County. The Carlton Lakes Master Association performed a traffic signal warrant analysis at the intersection of Carlton Lakes Boulevard/Delasol Lane in March 2020. The analysis determined that a traffic signal was not warranted. Since, traffic signal warrants are based on current traffic volumes, Carlton Lakes Master Association can perform another traffic signal warrant analysis in the future as traffic volumes change. 2. How does an overpass on Livingston Road help reduce congestion on Immokalee Road? A traffic signal has a definitive timeframe of about 3 minutes to cycle through all intersection movements. The proposed overpass will remove the northbound and southbound through movements from the signal's cycle, allowing more green time to be redistributed to the other intersection movements. The overpass is anticipated to decrease delays at the intersection and traffic congestion along the corridor. Without the recommended improvements, delays at the intersection are estimated to reach over 1-3 minutes by 2040. Reduced delays will also improve emergency response times. 3. There seems to be more traffic going east -west on Immokalee Road, why is the bridge recommended on Livingston Road? Each intersection was evaluated using the FDOT Intersection Control Evaluation criteria and based on projected 2040 traffic volumes (not today's traffic volumes). The evaluation found that an overpass on Livingston Road would be most effective at managing the traffic volumes at the intersection. Further, an overpass along Immokalee Road (over Livingston Road) would not be as efficient and is constrained by the Cocohatchee Canal to the north and the high -voltage transmission lines that cross along Immokalee Road just west of the intersection. https://www.colliercountyfl.gov/your-government/divisions-s-zltransportation-planning/planning-studies 10/14 8/5/2021 Planning Projects and Studies I Collier County, FL 4. Will the overpass have natural environment, noise, aesthetic, and speed impacts? Will the project include a noise wall? Natural Environment Impacts. Collier County adheres to Clean Air Act requirements. Although some construction -phase air quality impacts are unavoidable (emissions from construction equipment, dust from activities, etc.), measures will be taken to minimize disruption. There may also be minor surface water impacts to the Cocohatchee Canal because of the proposed overpass, they will be mitigated through the appropriate agencies. However, by reducing congestion through the intersection, benefits are anticipated to include reduced air pollution and fuel consumption. Noise Impacts. o Traffic noise levels for the proposed overpass have not been evaluated at this time and are typically evaluated and abatement measures are considered during the design phase. A noise study identifies noise sensitive sites, compares and evaluates the traffic noise levels at the sites with and without the project, and evaluates the noise abatement measures. In order for a noise barrier to be considered, it must be feasible and reasonable, which means the noise levels and recommended abatement measures must meet certain noise reduction criteria. o Construction Noise. Although some construction noise is unavoidable, measures will be taken to keep noise during construction to a minimum. Aesthetic Impacts. Aesthetic treatments will be evaluated during design. When Collier County constructed the overpass at Golden Gate Parkway and Airport Road, the aesthetic treatments to minimize impacts to the surrounding residential areas were greatly considered. Public outreach will continue during design to solicit input from nearby residents and businesses regarding project aesthetics. Changes to the Posted Speed. The current posted speed limit along Immokalee Rd. and Livingston Rd. are not anticipated to change. Actual design speeds and posted speed limits will be determined during the Design Phase. If there is a current or future concern with speeding, traffic enforcement can be contacted to monitor the area. 4. How tall will this overpass be? Will I be able to see it from my house? The final height of the overpass will be determined during the design phase of the project. Preliminary analysis indicates the overpass would vary anywhere from 30-35 feet above the existing Livingston Road (at its peak). The overpass may be visible from neighboring areas. As stated above, aesthetic treatments will be evaluated during the design phase. Please see the potential sight line exhibit at the following link: Potential Sight Lines 5. Will construction impact access for biking and walking? Pedestrian, bicycle, and vehicular traffic will be maintained during construction. Prior to construction, a Maintenance of Traffic Plan will be developed. This plan will describe how access to all residences and businesses along the project will be continuously maintained. If detours for vehicle, bicycle, and/or pedestrian traffic are necessary during construction, they will be safe and meet all ADA standards. 6. I have watched the video, drove over, under and around the overpass at Golden Gate Parkway and Airport Road and still do not understand the concept. Can you explain it again? If you have not watched the Video, please click on the following link for a narrated presentation that further explains the recommended improvements at each intersection and other proposed improvements. Link to video Immokalee Congestion Study Video https://www.colliercountyfl.gov/your-government/divisions-s-zltransportation-planning/planning-studies 11/14 8/5/2021 Planning Projects and Studies I Collier County, FL If you have watched the video, yes - there will be changes to the way drivers enter and exit Livingston Road to and from nearby businesses and neighborhoods, as well as changes to the way drivers travel through the intersection. Below are a few graphics to help visualize the potential access changes. The overpass will be designed and constructed to MOT design standards and specifications which includes safety requirements. Note that these concepts are preliminary and could change during the design phase. LEGEND Traffic Signal - Proposed Sodl Landscape - Proposed Pavement/ Resurfacing Proposed Overpass CA- t. rb T N tb https://www.colliercountyfl.gov/your-government/divisions-s-zltransportation-planning/planning-studies 12/14 8/5/2021 Planning Projects and Studies I Collier County, FL To access Carlton Lakes Boulevard (south entrance) and the shopping plaza: • if travelling southbound on Livingston Road, make a U-turn at the Intersection • if travelling northbound on Livingston Road, take the at -grade (ground level) northbound through lane LEGEND 11 Traffic Signal Turning Direction C7 U-Turn Movement 0 Full Median opening - Proposed Sodl Landscape - Proposed Pavement! Resurfacing Pm.v.m.t f1.nmocc Current - Wilson Blvd. Corridor Study H wee Table WAW Past Planning Studies Past - East of CR-951 Bridge Re -Evaluation Study (2o2i) Past - Golden Gate Parkway - Complete Street Study (2021) Past - Randall Blvd./Oil Well Rd. Corridor Study (2019) Past - Pine Ridge Rd. Corridor Congestion Study (2018) Past - CR 951 Extension PD & E Study (2005) Past - East of CR 951 Bridge Study (2oo8) Past - Green Blvd Extension (2006) Past - I-75/Everglades Blvd Interchange Justification Report (2013) Past - Master Mobility Plan (2011) Past - Northeast Collier County Trail Feasibility Study (2008) Past - Triangle Blvd. Study (2017) Past - Vanderbilt Beach Road Extension (2006) Past - Vanderbilt Drive (2005) https://www.colliercountyfl.gov/your-government/divisions-s-zltransportation-planning/planning-studies 13/14 MMOKaLee Koa Corridor Congestion Studyw- Ir r, G 1 s -7, _ 1 i M u�rcaN Project Purpose, Needs and Goals '� ., �_� _ •�#� _ _ 0 Ali' .i_�_ �� s��i ■I� �. �, .� �ilii Project The Immokalee Rd. Corridor Congestion Study was performed to analyze the existing and future traffic conditions along the Immokalee Rd. corridor between Livingston Rd. and Logan Blvd. Project Need: The current traffic volumes along the Immokalee Corridor are currently approaching the capacity of the existing roadway. Based on anticipated traffic growth, the corridor operations will experience severe delays by 2040 if no improvements are made. Project Goal: The goal of the study is to model and project future traffic volumes and level of service (LOS) for both a 5- year (2025) and 20-year (2040) period and to identify corridor improvements that will accommodate future growth. Level of Service (LOS) Level of Service (LOS) is a method used to determine how well a transportation facility is operating from a traveler's perspective. LOS A: Free flow. LOS 6: Reasonably free flow. LOS C: Stable flow, at or near free flow. LOS D: Approaching unstable flow. LOS E: Unstable flow, operating a�pacity. LOS F: Forced or breakdown flow. -Reasonably Free -flow -Stable Opi EL-Borderline UnstabiO -Extremely -Breakdown Source: https://www.slideshare.net/ABDULKADERMUHAMMADI/level-of-servicelos-of-a-road-with-calculi 3 Project Limits ■ The project limits for the Immokalee Rd. study are from Livingston Rd. to Logan Blvd. ■ There are 9 intersections within this study, which are labeled "A" through "I" as shown above. ■ A: Livingston Rd. ■ B: Juliet Blvd./Strand Blvd. ■ C: Southbound On/Off Ramps 1-75 ■ D: Northbound On/Off Ramps 1-75 ■ E: Northbrooke Dr./Tarpon Bay Blvd. ■ F: Oakes Blvd. ■ G: Valewood Dr. ■ H: Executive Dr. ■ I: Logan Blvd. ■ Improvements will be required along the entire corridor for it to operate efficiently. For example, the traffic flow at Intersection "A" (Livingston Rd.) influences the traffic flow at Intersections "B" through "I." Land Use .q-.r• eH_ , B ° C D , E F GA AIlk no Kim •I 5 iFSa�� M+� �. i 4 �� ti The availability of adjacent land versus the total land area required for roadway improvements is often a limiting factor when modifying existing intersections. ■ North side of the corridor is approaching buildout. ■ Constrained by Cocohatchee Canal ■ South side of the corridor is dense with few remaining parcels available for development. In addition, since the Immokalee Corridor accommodates regional as well as local traffic, land use and growth in the surrounding area were also considered. Corridor Traffic Volume Growth is SRI Lp ""��"�.'-•'� • �1 + K• �n � `.tr .car, , --•,.!�Y SOP AT expected to grow ver 40% 2015 204 Population Population 358,000 510,000 Safety •, �� ,�� - 0 ��_ ��ii' 'i��l� � �� 1 �!I� r� .mow ■ Vehicular, pedestrian, and bicyclist safety is an important factor when evaluating roadway improvements ■ Crash data was collected over a 5-year period 30% 25% 20% 15% 10%I d a 5% MINI 0% cl�a� Oa sae cl�+a r,°A ern R ■Total Crashes (1,267) ■Severe Crashes (15) fo 300 250 200 U 150 10 5 C) ��a � a � aiQ��• �`,a gyo tl � CP ■Total Crashes (1,267) 7 Project Overview 1. Immokalee Road Corridor Improvements 2. Immokalee Road Intersection Improvements 3. Traffic Signal Coordination 4. Roadway Network/Access Management Improvement Opportunities Immokalee Road Corridor Improvements 77 #+ pop cYx ri'''s Y} '' . �y �.. ��y 'A�� -- _..._ �- ::tlr; 7�i �L ~ ��i� . � ��'�� f —��i ix- �J�c�l"'..,1�.• .. ��..�Y.'1wP.Y ��C�� , zl S.�.P4+'-!� � - • The recommended corridor improvement within the project area consists of providing a new "combination" thru/right turn lane for westbound traffic. • The improvements will also add an additional lane for westbound traffic accessing the 1-75 northbound on - ramp. Conventional & Innovative Intersections F G H A I f �„� .,_ ;' •_.-..JC�C �a aAN I�Is' �.'* � `•er .cam•.•'• ...... .� �a Kim ■� �. _ � .� .I� Mid" 01 14 ■ Conventional improvements consist of adding lanes for capacity and lengthening turn lanes. ■ Can be insufficient at some busy intersections. ■ Innovative intersections provide the solutions that conventional intersection improvements cannot. ■ Optimize vehicle, pedestrian, and bicycle movements ■ Reduce delay ■ Increase efficiency ■ Provide safer travel for all road users The intersection alternatives focused on the specific mobility needs at each location while considering the overall effects to the corridor. http://www.vi rgin i adot.org/i n novative i me rsections/#:—:text=l n novative % 20i ntersection % 20a nd % 20i ntercha nge % 20d esigns,trave I % 20for % 20a I I % 20road % 20users. Intersection Control Evaluation (ICE) Process Chart TYPE OF INTERSECTION Diverging Diamond Interchange N-S Overall vic Ratio 0.53 V/C Ranking 1 Multimodal Score 3.3 Single Point N-S 0.59 2 2.4 Displaced Left Turn 0.78 3 2.4 Displaced Left Turn (Interchange) E-W 0.90 4 2.4 Partial ❑isplaced Left Turn E-W 0.91 5 2.4 Partial Displaced Left Turn N-S 0.92 6 2.4 Diverging Diamond Interchange E-W 0.96 7 3.3 Single Point E-W 0.96, 7 2.4 Displaced Left Turn (Interchange) N-S 1.05 9 2.4 Partial Median U-Turn N-S 1.18 10 3.1 The ICE process evaluates the various intersection improvements being considered and scores its operational and safety performance. Source: http://www.ncfrpc.org/mtpo/FuliPackets/FDOT_ICE%20Manual_FINAL_11011766-1_me3x2.pdf Intersection Improvements Livingston Rd (intersection "N' p JO ' Ailo I ft loot for- m Opp I 4 Livingston Rd (Intersection "X) - Analysis Intersection Level of Service • AM (LOS ) • Delay: s • PM (LOS ) • Delay: s -1 L • AM (LOS F) • Delay: "--s • PM (LOS F) • Delay: 494s 14 Livingston Rd (Intersection "X) - Analysis Innovative Intersection Recommendation Diverging Diamond Interchange N-S 1.02 1 3.3 Single Point N-S 1.10 2 2.4 Displaced Left Turn 1.52 3 2.4 Displaced Left Turn (Interchange) E-W 1 1.69 4 2.4 Partial Displaced Left Turn N-S 1.74 f 5 2.4 Partial Displaced Left Turn E-W 1.74 5 2.4 Diverging Diamond Interchange E-W 1.81 7 3.3 Single Point E-W 1.81 7 2.4 Displaced Lett Turn {Interchange} N-S 1.86 9 2.4 Traffic Signal 2.23 10 2.4 Single Point N-57N-S 1.07 1 2.4 Diverging Diamond Interchange1.18 IF 2 3.3 Displaced Left Turn1.33 Fr 3 2.4 Displaced Left Turn (Interchange) E-W 1.38 r 4 2.4 Diverging Diamond Interchange E-W 1.40 5 5 3.3 Single Point E-W 1.40 2.4 Partial Displaced Left Turn N-S 1.49 7 2.4 Partial Displaced Left Turn E-W 1.51 8 2.4 Displaced Left Turn (Interchange) N-S 1.78 9 2.4 Traffic Signal 1.89 10 2.4 15 ACCESS MANAGEMENT ALTERNATIVE MILTON LAnE9_Bt.VD.'_ TRIPLE LEFT 0.53 TURN LANES 4P I NOW ll lbH I I UF<NLAI\4L IMOKALEE ---------- - -------- -------------------------------------------- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ---- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - __m. w - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - RIGHT TURN LAN ar tp E O , wl$ -7 SINGLE NB A THRU LANE 4 LANE OVERPASS NB&SB DOUBLE LEFT k) TURN LANES JNK Proposed Conceptut. Livingston Rd (Intersection "X) - Analysis Intersection Level of Service • AM (LOS ) • Delay: 477s • PM (LOS F) • Delay: 494s • AM (LOS E) • Delay: 66s • PM (LOS E) • Delay: 59s Strand Blvd./Juliet Blvd. (Intersection "B" rI "� - _ ��.•' • I ii!' tea. - vs.s ri =s �"�,i�� _ _ ._-' ,-_.•_ �_,r i= "- ':� s�. -' --��L. '-----'^"«�iZis�r�� COCOHATCHEE CANAL 'w a� 7 'T T T s " ft e �.�t►T' ark Strand Blvd./Juliet Blvd. (Intersection "B") - Analysis Intersection Level of Service • AM (LOS E) • AM (LOS F • Delay: 57s • Delay: 11 • PM (LOS D) • PM (LOS F • Delay: 39s • Delay: 1' 19 Strand Blvd./Juliet Blvd. (Intersection "B") - Analysis Intersection Recommendation Displaced Left Turn 0-99 Median U-Turn NS 1.07 � x 3,1 Partlal Displaced Left Turn E-VV 1.09 3 2A Partial Displaced Left Turn N 5 1.10 4 2.4 Median U-Turn E-W 1-16 5 3.1 Signalised Restricted Crossing U-Turn E-W 1-21 6 3.1 Partial Median U-Turn E-W 1.24 7 3.1 Partial Median U-Turn N-S 1.34 0 3.1 Traffic Signal Sig., red Restricted Crossing U-Turn N-S 1-39 9 2-4 5-05 10 3-1 Displaced Left Turn 0-95 1 2-4 Partlal Displaced Left Turn E-W 1.07 2 2.4 Partlal Displaced Left Turn N-5 1.10 3 2.4 Median U-Turn N-S 1-14 4 3-1 Median U-Turn E-W 1.16 5 3.1 Signalized Restricted Crossing U-Turn E-W 1.20 6 3.1 Partial Median U-Turn E-W 1.22 7 3.1 Traffic Signal 1.36 8 2.4 Partial Median U-Turn N-S 1.41 9 3.1 Signalized Restricted Crossing U-Turn N-S 5.00 10 3.1 i ' ADD LEFT AND DEDICATED ` RIGHT TURN LANE INCREASE LEFT TURN LANE STORAGE ` - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - L - - - - - .� Cb . W. -------------------------------- -------------------------------- r JJ ADD THRU/RIGHT` - INCREASE LEFT TURN TURN LANE LANE STORAGE - --------------------- - - - - -- �-- - - -- ---__- - _� -----------------------------�,y_ _- - - - =r= _-- - -- ____------------ -------------------- Illllfllll - IMMOKALEE RD. f;w OPTIONAL FREE FLOW RIGHT r k INCREASE LEFT TURN �I*�� LANE STORAGE { {� ' ~ � III! 1HIAIiIIIIHHNll11111 � �, I y L yyam�. Strand Blvd./Juliet Blvd. (Intersection "B") - Analysis Intersection Level of Service = A ' . ►� ,"■�- -ter— . y �- Wx if : w FW,- �03�� Lam • AM (LOS F) • Delay: 189s • PM (LOS F) 6 • Delay: '' "4s • AM (LOS D) ~ • Delay: 52s • PM (LOS E) 9 Delay: 57s 1-75 Southbound &Northbound On/Off Ramps (intersections "C" & "D11) if �� r N JW �r r wl 66 Ilk', N j '77 1-75 Southbound & Northbound On/Off Ramps (Intersection "C" & "D") - Analysis Intersection Level of Service • AM (LOS E) • AM (LOS F) • Delay: 62s • Delay: 171s • PM (LOS E) , , • PM (LOS F) • Delay: 57s • Delay: 191s 7r---", • AM (LOS E) • AM (LOS F) • Delay: 74s , • Delay: 234s • PM (LOS D) • PM (LOS F) • Delay: 44s • Delay: _-3s IF r 24 1-75 Southbound & Northbound On/Off Ramps (Intersection "C" & "D") - Analysis Innovative Interchange Recommendation Partial Cloverleaf A E-W 0.98 1 1.5 Partial Cloverleaf B E-VV 1.02 2 1.5 ❑iverging Diamond Interchange E-W 1.16 3 3.3 Single Point E-W 1.22 4 2.4 1 Displaced Left Turn (Interchange) E-W 2.75 IL 5 2.4 Diamond E-W 3.87 8 2.4 Single Point N-S 5.66 7 2.4 Partial Cloverleaf A N S 5.78 8 1.5 Partial Cloverleaf 8 NS 5.91 9 1.5 Displaced Left Turn (Interchange) N-5 6.28 E 10 2A Partial Cloverleaf 8 E-W 1.13 1 1-5 Partial Cloverleaf A E-W 1.17 2 1.5 Diverging Diamond Interchange E-W 1.17 2 3.3 Single Point E-W 1.39 4 2.4 Displaced Left Turn {interchange} E-W 2.90 5 2.4 Diamond E-W 3.B1 6 2.4 Partial Cloverleaf A NS 5.70 7 1.5 Single Point N-S 5.79 8 2.4 Partial Cloverleaf B N-S 5.87 9 10 1.5 Displaced Left Turn (Interchange) NS 6.46 2.4 25 1-75 Southbound & Northbound On/Off Ramps (Intersection "C" & "D") - Analysis Intersection Level of Service _ _ c •.e ate= .•°. A' ;A i� � B ° C D��E �'• �� /' F l i G � +..+s��H��•--.�r`iP � .. �d t # _ 0 r■�...��.� �r ram• SA! a • AM (LOS.) • Delay: 171s • PM (LOS F) • Delay: 191s The intersection delay is reduced by 65%. • AM (LOS D) • Delay: 42s • PM (LOS B) • Delay: 18s • AM (LOS ) • Delay: 234s • PM (LOS F) • Delay: 120s • AM (LOS ) • Delay: 81s • PM (LOS D) • Delay: 48s ..... ..... Ot �jq $4 look Proposed Conceptual IMMOKALEE RD. l +JIM jr,— - - - - - - - - - _j r- }s --- - -w.�..T-•----r�.� ,z--ems ADDITIONAL WATER k TREAMTMENT ,ail POND TBD I I I r<" �•d"_ IMMOKALEE RD. - - - - - - - - - - - - __ - --- .�•— ---_cen-� r -rJ �� t , - r � + - - - c,:;- - - •�'y �. ^ rJ t fJ r - - - - - - -- A- - ti - - - - - - - - - 00 ■ V. 41 ■ ADDITIONAL "T WAT E R z m m TREAMTMENT POND TBD I Ln 4fr` '� i_ t ■ _ .r i I II rrr Proposed Conceptua lt7_ z �. Northbrooke Dr./Tarpon Bay Blvd. (Intersection "E") 01 ..� Ar ,ter Northbrooke Dr./Tarpon Bay Blvd. (Intersection "E") - Analysis Intersection Level of Service • AM (LOS E) • Delay: 79s • PM (LOS D) • Delay: 43s • AM (U • Delay • PM (LOS F) • Delay: 119s 7 31 Northbrooke Dr./Tarpon Bay Blvd. (Intersection "E") - Analysis Intersection Recommendation Displaced Left Turn 1,11 .1 2.4 Partial Displaced Left Turn E-W 1.16 �3 2.4 Signalized Restricted Crossing U-Turn E-W 1.30 a 3.1 Partial Displaced Left Turn N 5 1 1.37 4 2.4 Median U-Turn N-S Partial Median U-Turn E-W 1.42 1.44 5 6 3.1 3.1 Partial Median U-Tum N-S 1-46 7 3-1 Median U-Turn E-W 1.48 8 3.1 Traffic Signal 1.55 9 2.4 Signalized Restricted Crossing U-Turn N-S 5.05 10 3.1 ■ - • - a Displaced Left Turn 0-93 i 1- ! 7PartlaI Displaced Left Turn N-S 1.00 2 Partial Displaced Left Turn E-W 1.01 3 Partial Median U-Turn N-S 1.11 4 3.1 Median U-Turn NS 1.13 i 5 3.1 Median U-Tarn E-W 1.16 6 3.1 Partial Median U•Turn E-W 1.20 7 3.1 Traffic Signal 1.23 f 8 2.4 Signalized Restricted Crossing U-Turn E-W 1.28 1 9 3.1 Signalized Restricted Crossing U-Turn NS 4.18 I 10 3.1 32 i 1 _ INTERESECTION IMPROVEMENTS . +'+kly ADD LEFT RIGHT AND THRU LANE ADD THRU/RIGHT INCREASE LEFT TURN ADD LEFTINCREASE LEFT TURN �� O TURN LANE LANE STORAGE TURN LANE z LANE STORAGE -------------- - - ------------------------------------- - - - - -.--------'- --- ----------_____-__-_-_-_-_-------------- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - vt •- -. �-. - ___ - - - - - - - - _ - - - -• - - - F - - -_- - - -' - - - - : T T - - - - - - - ^ - - - - - - - - "- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - •- - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - i- - - - - - - --- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - -L IMMOKALEE RD. ...' .1;. - _�_,„ t ADD LEFT TURN LANE .0 .I Z own- -0�1 p Northbrooke Dr./Tarpon Bay Blvd. (Intersection "E") - Analysis Intersection Level of Service • AM (LOS F) • Delay: 245s • PM (LOS F) • Delay: ' ^s • AM (LOS E) • Delay: 74s • PM (LOS E) 9 Delay: 62s Oakes Boulevard (In COCOHATCHEE CANAL OKALEE _ �. 1 - L• IN woll . g Sry �. !O ADD THRU/RIGHT Y ADD THRU/RIGHT �.. I z TURN LANE Q TURN LANE Q --------------------------------------------------------------- - - - - -- ------------------------- - - - - ------------- ---- -- ¢ — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - •�� Y y z ;Ii6fi1}IHIAili4}111 .. - _ t - IMMOKALEE RD _ ci _ Y LEFT TURN LANES ► �y _ --- __ ** -� WILL BE EXTENDED ' W s � • r. :� , f `: ;� .. - .�♦ate R. .��iF.•!•.:' �-; I - � - •.y 1 :e`- Tom: y, ,++�e MF� LL Valewood Drive (Intersection "G" I Valewood Drive (Intersection "G") - Analysis Intersection Level of Service *AM (LOS E) • Delay: 71s • PM (LOS D) • Delay: 38s 4 • AM (LOS F) • Delay • PM (LO • Delay Valewood Drive (Intersection "G") - Analysis Intersection Recommendation PartlaI Displaced Left Turn E-W .- 1-04 1 2-4 Displaced Left Turn 1A4 1 2.4 Median U-Turn N-S 1.10 3 3A Partial Displaced Left Turn N-S 1 1-13 4 2-4 Median U-Turn E-W Partial Median U-Turn E-W 1.14 1.14 5 5 3-1 3.1 Partial Median U-Turn N-5 1.17 7 3.1 Signalized Restricted Crossing U-Turn E-W 1.18 8 3-1 Traffic Signal 1.19 9 2-4 Quadrant Roadway 5-E 1.47 10 2.2 ■ ifminj IRE. - M Displaced Left Turn 0.93 1 2.4 Partial Displaced Left Turn N-S 0.89 It 2 2.4 Partial Displaced Left Turn E-W 0-91 3 2-4 Partial Median U-Turn N-S 0.94 4 3.1 Median U-Turn N-S 0.95 5 3.1 Signalized Restricted Crossing U-Turn E-W 0-96 6 3-1 Partial Median U-Turn E-W 1.03 7 3.1 Traffic Signal 1117 E 8 2-4 Median U-Turn E-W 1.97 8 3.1 Signalized Restricted Crossing U-Turn N-S 4.00 10 3.1 39 1 tiL .J ul .r r m� ADD DEDICATED -� RIGHT TURN LANE Y oil p - --------------- ------------------------- ------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------- ---------------- ---------------- ---------------- ---------------- IIIVIiIIIIiiHillll RH 910 vow w .� `, t •IF - �. 41 - lilT�; FLI] f -4-11 _ It w ADD THRU/RIGHT TURN LANE 14y c' IMMOKALEE RD. ---------------------------------- - -- --- -- ------------------------------------------- �'IRS --------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------- Tw- EXPAND WATER TREAMTMENT t +` POND TBD 1 �� ram. � i �►•�. I T •}, :. _ �r . -�- I I wv VJ 1. LA L.V 111. L. I../ L LAf• LA ' �r i .' Qt S: ' :� �' . • Valewood Drive (Intersection "G") - Analysis Intersection Level of Service • AM (LOS F) • Delay: 210s • PM (LOS c:) • Delay: s • AM (LOS E) • Delay: 74s • PM (LOS ) • Delay: 97s "The intersection delay is reduced by 34%. ♦yiN COCOHATCHEE CANAL �I.0 . .�'.• -r .- --ems+ U W X- W iv Jar MOL -' j %-6 I - ` , }1 .� • 1 - y �.laay.4 ` — -- — - l llll�ll0ld4L IT i6p RD. ay � t 4. -4 4- �. - ,• . � .. �ILL s r AITv Pn rITrCal Al A .•� y -• 'fir , �_ ��_x�� •�_ �� , "A'�' O w -- ADD THRU/RIGHT - - -- v` ADD THRU/RIGHT Q TURN LANE W TURN LANE IMMOKALEE RD. - ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------- AM - - - - - - - r - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ OE i .� "1�'�?ram•rr' +'� � ,� ,"�I•• • � <�.��!•r�.-��•_ •�i'"� y ��`k - � ' T i_ +sl' l `G'„rb'P • "�•r • t -� y i rrp• -+- �ea` '�s it 41 �.; c- "� Lye �f7. `i 'T•- :�F-ham, ; + e .,,� - •' # 1.. Logan Boulevard (Intersection "I") _-- Y lTr - -- Y1�.OM �•. -. o q i�. z r B C D i,• E .� .' IWA N R w. Oph t ►r r Logan Boulevard (Intersection #fr) - Analysis Intersection Level of Service • AM (LOS E) • AM (LOS ) • Delay: 66s , • Delay: 226s • PM (LOS E) • PM (LOS F) • Delay: 74s • Delay: 224 45 Logan Boulevard (Intersection #fr) - Analysis Innovative Intersection Recommendation Diverging Diamond Interchange N-S 0.61 L 1 3.3 Single Point N-S 0.62 a 2 2.4 Displaced Left Turn 1.06 93 2.4 Partial Displaced Left Tum N-S 1 1.17 4 2.4 Displaced Left Turn (Interchange) E-W 1.20 I` 5 2.4 Single Point E-W 1.23 $ 2.4 Partial Displaced Left Turn E-W 1.24 7 2.4 Partial Median U-Turn N-S 1.26 8 3.1 Diverging Diamond Interchange E-W 1.39 9 3.3 Median U-Turn E-W 1.43 10 3.1 6,11 id• ■ Diverging Diamond Interchsange N-S 0.86 1 3.3 Single Point N-S 0.89 2 2.4 Displaced Left Turn 1.04 E 3 2.4 Partial Displaced Left Turn E-W 1.18 4 2.4 Displaced Left Tum (Interchange) E-W 1.21 5 2-4 Diverging Diamond Interchange E-W 1.27 6 3.3 Single Potent E-W 1.27 6 2.4 Partial Displaced Left Turn NS 1-38 V8 2.4 Median U-Turn NS 1.38 B 3.1 Partial Median U-Turn NS 1.43 It 10 3.1 M ., . T •F � �. r - - UJ* i I M I I �• . ..:� 1[ M O�m NEW J Yl1M I _.�..... IMMOKALEE ROAD--------.- --_---------- •-•- l- ` - ...._.. _ _ _ s e _ _ _ ------- _ — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — •••• ..f� _ _ — — — — _ t 1 + r -��•��- + i '1� � M4.xsr�� r f1_ 41t _ •1•'1 �7� 1 r + y„ 5 � l �`y�'`�� p At Proposed Conceptual�i+ i. � : Y t5 44 _ -tea +� .,.. c - � �, r a ! � ! �'�et� _ � • � -..,. li 3 .0 .0p, 41 z IMMOKALEE ROAD ------------ ----------- -- ---- — ------------------------------- ----------- ----------------------------- - --------------- ----------- ------ — ------ .... - — ---------------- -- --. ..... 'tTm- ...... ... . .-A so 6, NT 0 AL 19 av Proposed Conceptual Logan Boulevard (Intersection #fr) - Analysis Intersection Level of Service • AM (LOS F) • Delay: 226s • PM (LOS F) • Delay: t24s • AM (LOS E) • Delay: 55s • PM (LOS B) • Delay: 15s I • AM (LOS D) • AM (LOS B) • Delay: 51s • Delay: 17s • PM (LOS D) • PM (LOS E) • Delay: 52s • Delay: 77s Signal Coordination Adaptive Traffic Signal Control "Centralized Signal System" The 6 signalized intersections in the corridor will be "coordinated;' allowing communication between the signals. https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/innovation/everydaycou nts/edc-1/asct.cfm Network Improvement Opportunities Network Improvement Opportunities Logan Boulevard Network Connectivity Study Purpose: Network connectivity can relieve congestion along Immokalee Rd. and improve operations at the Tarpon Bay Blvd. and Valewood Dr. intersection signals. ■ Local roadway network connections will be evaluated to improve access to: ■ Logan Blvd. ■ Tarpon Bay Blvd. ■ Reduce congestion on Oakes Blvd. 53 Network Improvement Opportunities Livingston Road Network Management Improvements Study ■ Roadway network management improvements ■ Access management connections ■ Interconnections with developments Summary Summary of Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study Recommendations Recommendations Livingston Road to Logan Boulevard • Add new westbound "combination" thru/right turn Lane Livingston Road (Intersection 'A") • SPUI/Grade Separated Overpass Strand Boulevard/Juliet Boulevard (Intersection "B") • Conventional improvements: add/extend turn Lanes 1-75 Interchange (Intersections "C" & "D") • Diverging Diamond Interchange Northbroohe Drive/Tarpon Bay Boulevard (Intersection "E") through Executive Drive (Intersection "H") • Conventional improvements: add/extend turn Lanes Logan Boulevard (Intersection '79 • Partial Displaced Left Turn (E-W) Intersection Thank You 'M Next Steps: • Please provide comments by April 16t", 2021 on our survey at: http://colliercountvfl.gov/planningstudies 4 Click on 'Current-Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study' • Present Recommendations to BCC (Tentative May) For any questions or concerns, contact Lorraine Lantz at: Lorraine. La n t z @col l iercou n tyf I. g ov At if!Clhr%D IMMOKALEE ROAD CORRIDOR CONGESTION STUDY Livingston Road to Logan Boulevard PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT VIDEO Version three 6/29/2021 1 [Slide 1 ] 2 The Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study Project is being conducted by Collier County 3 Transportation Planning with assistance from Jacobs Engineering in order to determine possible 4 improvements required from along Immokalee Road, from Livingston Road to Logan Boulevard, 5 to address current and projected traffic congestion along the corridor. 6 [Slide 2] 7 This presentation summarizes the project purpose, needs and goals. The aerial imagery shown 8 at the top of this slide shows the study limits and will be shown throughout this presentation for 9 reference. The specific intersections will be highlighted when appropriate. {click} The Immokalee 10 Road Corridor Congestion Study was performed to analyze the existing and future traffic 11 conditions along the Immokalee Road corridor between Livingston Road and Logan Boulevard. 12 {click} The current traffic volumes along the Immokalee Corridor are currently approaching the 13 capacity of the existing roadway. Based on anticipated traffic growth, the corridor operations will 14 experience severe delays by 2040 if no improvements are made. {click} The goal of the study is 15 to model and project future traffic volumes and level of service for both a 5-year and 20-year 16 period. Based on those projections, feasible corridor improvements were evaluated which would 17 efficiently and effectively accommodate the projected growth by reducing delay and congestion 18 and improving overall corridor operations. 19 [Slide 3] 20 A roadway's efficiency is evaluated by its level of service. Level of service is a method used to 21 determine how well a transportation facility is operating from a traveler's perspective. (click) As 6/29/2021 Draft 1 22 illustrated in the figure, at Level of Service 'A' traffic moves freely. {click) At Level of Service `B' 23 traffic moves reasonably at free flow. {click} At Level of Service `C' traffic moves at a stable flow, 24 at or near free flow. (click} At Level of Service 'D' traffic flow is approaching unstable flow. {click} 25 At Level of Service 'E' traffic moves at unstable flow and the corridor is operating at capacity. 26 fclick} At Level of Service `F' traffic experiences significant congestion and delays. Collier 27 County's goal is to operate their facilities at a Level of Service E or better. 28 [Slide 4] 29 The project limits for the Immokalee Road study are from Livingston Road to Logan Boulevard. 30 fclick} There are 9 intersections within this study which are labeled 'A' through `I' as shown in the 31 above image. The aerial at the top of the slide will highlight each intersection in red as it is being 32 discussed. [click) Intersection "A" is Livingston Road. (click} Intersection "B" is Juliet 33 Boulevard/Strand Boulevard. fclick) Intersection "C" includes the southbound on and off ramps 34 for 1-75. (click} Intersection "D" includes the northbound on and off ramps for 1-75. (click} 35 Intersection "E" is Northbrooke Drive/Tarpon Bay Boulevard. fclick} Intersection "F" is Oakes 36 Boulevard. (click} Intersection "G" is Valewood Drive. fclick} Intersection "H" is Executive Drive. 37 [click} And intersection "I" is Logan Boulevard. (click) Due to the manner in which traffic flows 38 along the corridor, improvements will be required along the entire corridor for it to operate 39 efficiently. For example, the traffic flow at Intersection "A" influences the traffic flow at Intersections 40 "B" through 'T" Therefore, the effects of each intersection improvement must be considered along 41 the entire corridor. 42 [Slide 5] 43 Land use is a key factor in transportation planning as it influences traffic patterns and flow in the 44 surrounding areas and can restrict the types of roadway improvements that can be done. The 45 availability of adjacent land, versus the total land area required for roadway improvements, is 46 often a limiting factor when modifying existing intersections. Therefore, constructing the 47 theoretical "best" functioning intersection is not always feasible. As a result, a more feasible 6/29/2021 Draft 2 48 intersection may be chosen even if it is not theoretically the "best" technical solution. {click} For 49 example, land use along the north side of the corridor is approaching buildout. Additionally, the 50 Cocohatchee Canal runs along the north side of the roadway further constraining the types of 51 improvements that can be done.{click} Land use along the south side of the corridor is dense with 52 few remaining parcels available for development. These existing conditions, as well as planned 53 future growth, were incorporated into the traffic model. {click} In addition, since the Immokalee 54 Corridor accommodates regional as well as local traffic, land use and growth in the surrounding 55 area was also considered. 56 [Slide 6] 57 The population of Collier County is expected to grow by more than 40% by 2045, which is another 58 factor in estimating the volume of traffic expected along the corridor. Today, the traffic volume 59 averages 43,400 vehicles per day and is expected to increase to approximately 72,450 vehicles 60 per day by 2040. This represents an approximate traffic growth of 67 percent. Therefore, a variety 61 of improvements are required along the corridor and within the surrounding area to accommodate 62 future growth. 63 [Slide 7] 64 Vehicular, pedestrian, and bicyclist safety is an important factor when evaluating roadway 65 improvements. {click} For this study, crash data from 2014 to 2019 was evaluated for each 66 intersection within the project limits. This data was used when considering the feasibility of each 67 intersection improvement alternative. The bar graphs summarize the intersection crash data along 68 the corridor that was used while considering roadway intersection improvements. 69 [Slide 8] 70 As a result, during the study, we evaluated the Immokalee Road corridor, the individual 71 intersections, the traffic signal coordination along the corridor, as well as roadway network and 72 access management improvement opportunities within the study area. 73 [Slide 9] 6/29/2021 Draft 3 74 Due to the proximity of existing development along the roadway, as well as the Cocohatchee 75 Canal which runs along the north side of Immokalee Road, feasible opportunities for corridor 76 improvements are limited. The recommended corridor improvement within the project area 77 consists of providing a new "combination" thru/right turn lane for westbound traffic. This would 78 consist of adding pavement, restriping the existing right turn lanes, and incorporating the existing 79 shoulder areas from Logan Boulevard to Livingston Road. The proposed improvements will also 80 include an additional lane and signal for westbound traffic accessing the 1-75 northbound ON 81 ramp. The typical section to the left shows an existing layout along Immokalee Road. {click} The 82 typical section to the right shows the proposed improvements using the existing right turn lane 83 and shoulder area for the proposed combination thru/right turn lane. These improvements are 84 expected to alleviate corridor congestion for westbound traffic. 85 [Slide 10] 86 Now we will discuss the types of intersection improvements considered as part of this study, which 87 consisted of both conventional and innovative solutions. (click) Conventional improvements 88 typically consist of adding lanes for capacity and lengthening turn lanes. However, these types of 89 improvements at intersections that experience high levels of congestion with safety concerns, are 90 typically insufficient. {click) In these cases, innovative intersections provide the solutions that 91 conventional intersection improvements cannot. Innovative intersections optimize vehicle, 92 pedestrian, and bicycle movements to reduce delay, increase efficiency, and provide safer travel 93 for all road users. (click) The intersection alternatives focused on the specific mobility needs at 94 each location while considering the overall effects to the corridor. 95 [Slide 11] 96 The study followed the Florida Department of Transportation's Intersection Control Evaluation 97 methodology, or "ICE" process, which is a standardized method for evaluating intersection 98 improvements. The ICE process evaluates the various types of intersection improvements being 99 considered and scores its operational and safety performance. These scores are used to assess 6/29/2021 Draft 4 100 the various alternatives. This table shows an example of what an ICE Chart looks like. Charts 101 specific to each intersection have been prepared and will be shown throughout this presentation. 102 [Slide 12] 103 This part of the presentation will discuss individual intersection improvements. The study 104 examined each intersection along the corridor and identified efficient and feasible alternatives to 105 relieve congestion. 106 [Slide 13] 107 The first intersection presented is Livingston Road, shown here as Intersection "A" . 108 [Slide 14] 109 In order to evaluate improvements, we examined the intersections' current and future traffic 110 volumes. The "No -Build" condition analyzes the intersection as it exists today. The existing 2019 111 traffic volumes indicate the intersection is currently operating at a Level of Service F in the 112 afternoon's peak hour, also commonly known as rush hour. The delay indicates the amount of 113 seconds a typical vehicle will wait at the intersection during rush hour, which is a weighted average 114 for each of the traffic movements at the intersection. You can see how the projected delays 115 increase from 2019, to 2025, to 2040. Therefore, the intersection under its existing conditions, will 116 operate at a level of service "F," which is a "forced or breakdown flow," in the morning and evening 117 rush hour traffic by 2025. Delays will become more severe by 2040 reaching over 8 minutes at 118 rush hour. 119 [Slide 15] 120 The proposed improvements were evaluated using the FDOT's ICE procedure. These tables 121 summarize the ICE analysis for the Livingston Road intersection. (click) Due to excessive volumes 122 at this intersection, conventional intersection improvements would not provide the necessary 123 relief. Therefore, many types of innovative intersections were evaluated. These alternatives were 124 analyzed using both the morning, AM, and evening, PM, peak traffic volumes. {click} The analysis 125 indicated that a Single Point Urban Interchange would be the most efficient and effective solution 6/29/2021 Draft 5 126 to accommodate future traffic demands. Therefore, a Single Point Urban Interchange is the 127 recommended solution for this intersection. 128 [Slide 16] 129 This exhibit shows a conceptual illustration of the Single Point Urban Interchange, or overpass, 130 at Livingston Road and Immokalee Road, which will be further refined during design. A Single 131 Point Urban Interchange includes a bridge over the intersection to allow for large volumes of traffic 132 through the intersection without stopping. {click} The 4-lane bridge, as shown in darker gray, will 133 convey the Livingston Road North -South traffic over Immokalee Road. There won't be many 134 changes on Immokalee Road except for travelling under the bridge. {click} In addition, there will 135 be a single `at -grade' northbound through lane to provide for local access{click} There will be two 136 northbound left turn lanes and three southbound left turn lanes. {click} The north and southbound 137 right turn movements will be free flow. {click} Access management to the entrance of Carlton 138 Lakes Boulevard will be further evaluated during design. Operations will be similar to what you 139 experience at the existing overpass located at Golden Gate Parkway and Airport -Pulling Road. 140 [Slide 171 141 A comparison of the traffic operations between the "2040 No -Build" to the "2040 recommended 142 solution" shows a significant improvement in both level of service and delay at the intersection. 143 The delays will decrease from 8 minutes to approximately 1 minute at rush hour. 144 [Slide 18] 145 Heading east along Immokalee Road, the next intersection presented is the Strand 146 Boulevard/Juliet Boulevard intersection, shown here as Intersection "B" . 147 [Slide 19] 148 In order to evaluate improvements, we examined the intersections' current and future traffic 149 volumes. The "No -Build" condition analyzes the intersection as it exists today. The existing 2019 150 traffic volumes indicate the intersection is currently operating at a Level of Service C in the peak 151 hour, also commonly known as rush hour. The delay indicates the amount of seconds a typical 6/29/2021 Draft 6 152 vehicle will wait at the intersection during rush hour, which is a weighted average for each of the 153 traffic movements at the intersection. You can see how the projected delays increase from 2019, 154 to 2025, to 2040. Therefore, the intersection under its existing conditions, will operate at a level 155 of service "F," which is a "forced or breakdown flow," in the morning and evening rush hour traffic 156 by 2040. Delays will become more severe by 2040 reaching over 3 minutes at the morning rush 157 hour. 158 [Slide 20] 159 The proposed improvements were evaluated using the FDOT's ICE procedure. These tables 160 summarize the ICE analysis for the Strand Boulevard/Juliet Boulevard intersection. {click} Many 161 types of innovative intersections were evaluated, however due to the limited right of way available 162 for improvements and the proximity to the 1-75 interchange, conventional improvements are 163 recommended. These alternatives were analyzed using both the morning, AM, and evening, PM, 164 peak traffic volumes. {click} Additionally, the Strand is built out nearly 100% and this was reflected 165 in the traffic growth models. The analysis indicated that conventional improvements would provide 166 a safe and effective solution to accommodate future traffic demands. Therefore, conventional 167 improvements of adding and extending turn lanes is the recommended solution for this 168 intersection. 169 [Slide 21] 170 This exhibit shows a conceptual illustration of the recommended conventional improvements at 171 the Strand Boulevard/Juliet Boulevard and Immokalee Road intersection. {click} The addition of 172 a combined westbound through/right turn lane will help convey westbound traffic. {click} Two 173 additional lanes are recommended at Strand Boulevard {click} and the turning lane lengths will be 174 increased on Immokalee Road as well as on Juliet Boulevard. {click} A free flow right turn on Juliet 175 Boulevard may be needed after 2040. 176 [Slide 22] 6/29/2021 Draft 7 177 A comparison of the traffic operations between the "2040 No -Build" to the "2040 recommended 178 solution" shows a significant improvement in both level of service and delay at the intersection. 179 The delays will decrease from over 3 minutes to under 1 minute. 180 [Slide 23] 181 Heading east along Immokalee Road, we arrive at the 1-75 interchange. For modelling purposes, 182 this interchange was evaluated as two intersections: the 1-75 Southbound On/Off Ramp, shown 183 here as Intersection "C," and the 1-75 Northbound On/Off Ramp, shown here as Intersection "D." 184 We will review the independent analysis' of the two intersections then review the recommended 185 solution for the interchange. 186 [Slide 24] 187 In order to evaluate improvements, we examined the current and future traffic volumes at the 188 Southbound On/Off Ramp intersection. The "No -Build" condition analyzes the intersection as it 189 exists today. For both the northbound and southbound on/off ramps, the existing 2019 traffic 190 volumes indicate the intersections are currently operating at a Level of Service D in the morning 191 peak hour, or rush hour. The delay indicates the amount of seconds a typical vehicle will wait at 192 the intersection during rush hour, which is a weighted average for each of the traffic movements 193 at the intersection. You can see how the projected delays increase from 2019, to 2025, to 2040. 194 Therefore, both intersections under their existing conditions, will operate at a level of service "F," 195 which is a "forced or breakdown flow," in the morning and evening rush hour traffic by 2040. 196 Delays will become more severe by 2040 reaching over 3 minutes at rush hour. 197 [Slide 25] 198 The proposed improvements were evaluated using the FDOT's ICE procedure. These tables 199 summarize the ICE analysis for the 1-75 Interchange. {click} Due to excessive volumes at this 200 intersection, as well as limited availability for expansion under the bridge, conventional 201 intersection improvements would not provide the necessary relief as a cost-effective solution. 202 Therefore, many types of innovative intersections were evaluated. These alternatives were 6/29/2021 Draft 8 203 analyzed using both the morning, AM, and evening, PM, peak traffic volumes. {click} The analysis 204 indicated that a Diverging Diamond Interchange would be the most efficient and cost-effective 205 solution to accommodate future traffic demands. Therefore, a Diverging Diamond Interchange is 206 the recommended solution for the 1-75 Interchange. 207 [Slide 26] 208 A comparison of the traffic operations between the "2040 No -Build" to the "2040 recommended 209 solution" shows a significant improvement in both level of service and delay at the southbound 210 on/off ramp intersection. The delays for the Southbound On/Off Ramp intersection will decrease 211 from approximately 3 minutes to under 1 minute. fclick} The delays for the Northbound On/Off 212 Ramp intersection will decrease from almost 4 minutes to approximately 1 minute. This would 213 reduce delays by 65%. 214 [Slide 27] 215 This exhibit shows a conceptual illustration of the Diverging Diamond Interchange proposed at I- 216 75. There is currently a Diverging Diamond Interchange at 1-75 and University Parkway, Exit 213, 217 in Sarasota. It is also in progress for the 1-75 interchange at Colonial Boulevard, in Fort Myers, at 218 Exit 136. 219 [Slide 28] 220 This animation will illustrate vehicular movement within a diverging diamond interchange. (click} 221 When travelling eastbound, the vehicles are diverged onto the north side of Immokalee Road to 222 allow eastbound and 1-75 northbound ON ramp movements to occur simultaneously. When that 223 phase is completed, westbound vehicles are diverged onto the south side of Immokalee Road to 224 allow the westbound and southbound ON ramp movements to occur simultaneously. When that 225 phase is completed the cycle restarts. Pedestrian movement within the interchange will occur 226 along the pathways shown flashing in yellow. 227 [Slide 29] 6/29/2021 Draft 9 228 Heading east along Immokalee Road, the next intersection presented is the Northbrooke 229 Drive/Tarpon Bay Boulevard intersection, shown here as Intersection "E" . 230 [Slide 30] 231 In order to evaluate improvements, we examined the intersections' current and future traffic 232 volumes. The "No -Build" condition analyzes the intersection as it exists today. The existing 2019 233 traffic volumes indicate the intersection is currently operating at a Level of Service D in the 234 morning peak hour, also commonly known as rush hour. The delay indicates the amount of 235 seconds a typical vehicle will wait at the intersection during rush hour, which is a weighted average 236 for each of the traffic movements at the intersection. You can see how the projected delays 237 increase from 2019, to 2025, to 2040. Therefore, the intersection under its existing conditions, will 238 operate at a level of service "F," which is a "forced or breakdown flow," in the morning and evening 239 rush hour traffic by 2040. Delays will become more severe by 2040 reaching over 4 minutes at 240 rush hour. 241 [Slide 31] 242 The proposed improvements were evaluated using the FDOT's ICE procedure. These tables 243 summarize the ICE analysis for the Northbrooke Drive/Tarpon Bay Boulevard intersection. {click} 244 Many types of innovative intersections were evaluated, however due to the limited right of way 245 available for improvements and the proximity to the 1-75 interchange, conventional improvements 246 are recommended. These alternatives were analyzed using both the morning, AM, and evening, 247 PM, peak traffic volumes. It is recommended to discuss with Hodges University about 248 implementing later classroom start times to reduce peak hour volumes. {click} Additionally, 249 Northbrooke Drive is built out nearly 100% and this was reflected in the traffic growth models. The 250 analysis indicated that conventional improvements would provide a safe and effective solution to 251 accommodate future traffic demands. Therefore, conventional improvements of adding and 252 extending turn lanes is the recommended solution for this intersection. 253 [Slide 32] 6/29/2021 Draft 10 254 This exhibit shows a conceptual illustration of the recommended conventional improvements at 255 Northbrooke Drive/Tarpon Bay Boulevard and Immokalee Road. {click} The additional westbound 256 through/right turn lane will help convey westbound traffic. {click} There will be three additional 257 lanes southbound on Northbrooke Drive. {click} There will be an additional northbound left turn 258 lane on Tarpon Bay Boulevard and an additional eastbound left turn lane on Immokalee Road. 259 {click} It is also recommended to increase the left turn lane length for the westbound left turn lane 260 on Immokalee Road. (click) Improvements at the Northbrooke Drive and Oakes Boulevard 261 intersection are also recommended. 262 [Slide 33] 263 A comparison of the traffic operations between the "2040 No -Build" to the "2040 recommended 264 solution" shows a significant improvement in both level of service and delay at the intersection. 265 The delays will decrease from a maximum of 4 minutes to approximately 1 minute. 266 [Slide 34] 267 Heading east along Immokalee Road, the next intersection presented is the Oakes Boulevard 268 intersection, shown here as Intersection "F" . 269 [Slide 35] 270 Due to the proximity to Northbrooke Drive/Tarpon Bay Boulevard and Valewood Drive, it is not 271 recommended to signalize this intersection. This exhibit shows a conceptual illustration of the 272 recommended conventional improvements at the intersection. {click} The addition of a combined 273 westbound through/right turn lane will help convey westbound traffic. {click} The eastbound left 274 turn lane will be extended. 275 [Slide 36] 276 Heading east along Immokalee Road, the next intersection presented is the Valewood Drive 277 intersection, shown here as Intersection "G" . 278 [Slide 37] 6/29/2021 Draft 11 279 In order to evaluate improvements, we examined the intersections' current and future traffic 280 volumes. The "No -Build" condition analyzes the intersection as it exists today. The existing 2019 281 traffic volumes indicate the intersection is currently operating at a Level of Service D in the 282 afternoon's peak hour, also commonly known as rush hour. The delay indicates the amount of 283 seconds a typical vehicle will wait at the intersection during rush hour, which is a weighted average 284 for each of the traffic movements at the intersection. You can see how the projected delays 285 increase from 2019, to 2025, to 2040. Therefore, the intersection under its existing conditions, will 286 operate at a level of service "F," which is a "forced or breakdown flow," in the morning and evening 287 rush hour traffic by 2040. Delays will become more severe by 2040 reaching approximately three 288 and a half minutes at rush hour. 289 [Slide 38] 290 The proposed improvements were evaluated using the FDOT's ICE procedure. These tables 291 summarize the ICE analysis for the Valewood Drive intersection. Many types of innovative 292 intersections were evaluated, however based on right of way restrictions, conventional 293 improvements are recommended. These alternatives were analyzed using both the morning, AM, 294 and evening, PM, peak traffic volumes. The analysis indicated that conventional improvements 295 would be the most efficient and effective solution to accommodate future traffic demands. 296 Therefore, conventional improvements of adding lanes is the recommended solution for this 297 intersection. 298 [Slide 39] 299 This exhibit shows a conceptual illustration of the recommended conventional improvements at 300 the intersection. {click} The addition of a combined westbound through/right turn lane will help 301 convey westbound traffic. {click} An additional southbound right turn lane on Valewood Drive is 302 also recommended. 303 [Slide 40] 6/29/2021 Draft 12 304 A comparison of the traffic operations between the "2040 No -Build" to the "2040 recommended 305 solution" shows a significant improvement in both level of service and delay at the intersection. 306 The delays can be reduced by 34%. 307 [Slide 41] 308 Heading east along Immokalee Road, the next intersection presented is the Executive Drive 309 intersection, shown here as Intersection "H" . 310 [Slide 42] 311 It is not recommended to signalize this intersection. This exhibit shows a conceptual illustration 312 of the recommended conventional improvements. fclick} The addition of a combined westbound 313 through/right turn lane will help convey westbound traffic. 314 [Slide 43] 315 The last intersection analyzed within the limits of this study is the Logan Boulevard intersection, 316 shown here as Intersection "I" . 317 [Slide 44] 318 In order to evaluate improvements, we examined the intersections' current and future traffic 319 volumes. The "No -Build" condition analyzes the intersection as it exists today. The existing 2019 320 traffic volumes indicate the intersection is currently operating at a Level of Service D at peak hour, 321 also commonly known as rush hour. The delay indicates the amount of seconds a typical vehicle 322 will wait at the intersection during rush hour, which is a weighted average for each of the traffic 323 movements at the intersection. You can see how the projected delays increase from 2019, to 324 2025, to 2040. Therefore, the intersection under its existing conditions, will operate at a level of 325 service "F," which is a "forced or breakdown flow," in the morning and evening rush hour traffic by 326 2040. Delays will become more severe by 2040 reaching almost 4 minutes at rush hour. 327 [Slide 45] 328 The proposed improvements were evaluated using the FDOT's ICE procedure. These tables 329 summarize the ICE analysis for the Logan Boulevard intersection. (click} Due to excessive 6/29/2021 Draft 13 330 volumes at this intersection, conventional intersection improvements would not provide the 331 necessary relief. Therefore, many types of innovative intersections were evaluated. These 332 alternatives were analyzed using both the morning, AM, and evening, PM, peak traffic volumes. 333 (click} The analysis indicated that a Partial Displaced Left Turn would be the most efficient and 334 cost-effective solution to accommodate future traffic demands. Therefore, a Partial Displaced Left 335 Turn is the recommended solution for this intersection. Note, a future overpass may also be 336 considered at Logan Boulevard after the year 2040. 337 [Slide 46] 338 This exhibit shows a conceptual illustration of the east -west Partial Displaced Left Turn along 339 Immokalee Road at Logan Boulevard. There is currently a partial displaced left turn at Daniels 340 Parkway and State Road 82 in Lee County. 341 [Slide 471 342 This animation will illustrate vehicular movement within a partial displaced left turn intersection. 343 (click} The benefit of this intersection configuration is to allow the left turn movements to occur 344 along with the eastbound and westbound traffic movements. This eliminates the left turn phase 345 at the main signal which will reduce delay at the intersection by providing more signal green time 346 for the heavier traffic movements. The intersection will function normally, except for the following 347 movements. As you can see from this animation eastbound and westbound left turn movements, 348 shown in yellow, will begin approximately one thousand feet prior to the intersection. Left turn 349 traffic will initially be stopped at a signal approximately five hundred feet from the intersection, 350 while the eastbound and westbound traffic moves. Once through movements are stopped, the 351 Left turn traffic will then be allowed to cross over opposing traffic and will stop at the main 352 intersections' signal. The northbound right turn movement, shown in pink, will be modified slightly 353 to avoid conflicts with the left turn movement, displaced on the opposite side of Immokalee Road. 354 The Northbound right turn movement will be directed by signal, with no right on red. Signage and 355 pavement markings will properly direct traffic around the left hand turns at the intersection. 6/29/2021 Draft 14 356 Meanwhile, the southbound right turn movement, shown in green, will operate normally at free 357 flow. 358 [Slide 48] 359 A comparison of the traffic operations between the "2040 No -Build" to the "2040 recommended 360 solution" shows a significant improvement in both level of service and delay at each of the signals 361 within a Partial Displaced Left Turn. The delays will decrease from almost 4 minutes to 362 approximately 1 minute. 363 [Slide 49] 364 In addition to analyzing the Immokalee Corridor as well as individual intersections to improve 365 traffic flow, the study also examined methods to improve operations by implementing signal 366 coordination between each intersection along the corridor. 367 [Slide 50] 368 This is called Adaptive traffic signal control. {click} The phasing of Adaptive Traffic Signal Control 369 adjusts the timing of red, yellow, and green lights to accommodate changing traffic patterns and 370 reduce traffic congestion based on real time traffic. {click} The 6 signalized intersections between 371 Livingston Road and Logan Boulevard will be "coordinated" allowing communication between the 372 signals. {click} The signals will all communicate through one "centralized signal system." The goal 373 is to move vehicles smoothly through the corridor, rather than experiencing "stop -and -go" traffic. 374 [Slide 511 375 Another recommendation of the study was to further evaluate the surrounding roadway network 376 to help identify local roadway connectivity improvements which would help alleviate traffic 377 volumes along the Immokalee Road corridor. 378 [Slide 52] 379 As a result, a Logan Boulevard Network Connectivity Study is being recommended. Network 380 connectivity improvements could relieve congestion along Immokalee Road and improve 381 operations at the Tarpon Bay Boulevard intersection and Valewood Drive intersection signals. 6/29/2021 Draft 15 382 This study would evaluate the benefits of side street connections to Logan Boulevard and Tarpon 383 Bay Boulevard to reduce congestion. The graphic illustrates possible street connections under 384 consideration within this network connectivity study. 385 [Slide 53] 386 The final component of the study was to review potential access management improvements 387 within the study area. As a result, a Livingston Road Access Management Improvements Study 388 is recommended. This study would evaluate access management opportunities to reduce peak 389 hour volumes at the intersection. The graphic shows proposed locations to review for access 390 management connectivity. Opportunities to evaluate may include adding a left turn lane into Aston 391 Gardens for northbound traffic on Livingston Road and adding a right turn lane into to Windsong 392 Club. Connectivity between developments such as Windsong Club and Bermuda Palms should 393 also be reviewed as part of this study. Improvements such as these will help reduce congestion 394 at the Immokalee Road signal. 395 [Slide 54] 396 In summary the recommendations of the Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study are as 397 follows: 398 [Slide 55] 399 From Livingston Road to Logan Boulevard, adding a combination westbound through/right turn 400 lane. For the Livingston Road intersection, a single point urban interchange, or grade separated 401 overpass, is recommended. For the Strand Boulevard/Juliet Boulevard intersection, conventional 402 improvements such as adding and extending turn lanes is recommended. For the 1-75 interchange 403 a Diverging Diamond is recommended. For Northbrooke Drive/Tarpon Bay Boulevard, Oakes 404 Boulevard, Valewood Drive, and Executive Drive, conventional improvements such as adding and 405 extending lanes is recommended. For Logan Boulevard, a Partial Displaced Left Turn intersection 406 is recommended in the east -west direction. 407 [Slide 56] 6/29/2021 Draft 16 408 Thank you for your interest in the Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study. This study was 409 conducted by Collier County Transportation Planning with assistance from Jacobs Engineering. 410 We are asking community members to provide comment by means of a survey which is located 411 on the Collier County Transportation Planning's Division website. Please submit your comments 412 by March 1st, 2021. If approved by the Board of County Commissioners, the projects within this 413 study will be prioritized and implemented based on available funding. For any additional questions 414 or concerns please contact Lorraine Lantz at Lorraine. LantzCcDcolliercountyfl.gov. This concludes 415 our presentation. 416 [END RECORDING] 6/29/2021 Draft 17 Livingston Road and Immokalee Road Access Changes Intersection Plan View Proposed Overpass — Conceptual CSC 0 0 i At -Grade ' ( NOW = (Ground Level) ' ' ' O Southbound Through Lane tit 70 Q Immokalee Rd 4t 4-Lane Bridge , II � i r-- -- -- --- - - - -- --- - 1V s ,unnm,um 1 i At-Gradeifi. (Ground Level) Northbound ' Through Lane To access Carlton Lakes Boulevard (south entrance) and the shopping plaza: • if travelling southbound on Livingston Road, make a U-turn at the intersection • if travelling northbound on Livingston Road, take the at -grade (ground level) northbound throuah lane LEGEND Traffic Signal G Turning Direction U-Turn Movement Full Median Opening Proposed Sod/ Landscape Proposed Pavement/ Resurfacing Proposed Overpass Bridge Ends - No Changes _ to Access - I+ Onq +ate Existing { U-Turn to be ,, w Evaluated L: 1 CL _ .■ ! �Fw i I�~. I �=Carlton Lakes Blvd me _=+_ =� y Ground Level - - I Northbound ' Immokalee Rd _ Through Lane Gorr County No change will occur to access Aston Gardens and St. Croix LEGEND Traffic Signal Turning Direction U-Turn Movement Proposed Sod/ Landscape Proposed Pavement/ Resurfacing Proposed Overpass C-ofter County A- L - �►s �6=1011 IV +T LfA i _ �� Bermucla it Pa"Ims i i} � Wndsong eel^ To access Livingston Lakes from southbound Livingston Road, make a U-turn at the North Collier Regional Park signal LEGEND Traffic Signal Turning Direction U-Turn Movement Proposed Sod/ Landscape Proposed Pavement/ Resurfacing Proposed Overpass Gorr County Immokalee R '. Vu 4VAAW N 3 '4 Bridge goo • - �' Ends CL _ World Dr you.. .. � w�� ti✓k -■ IJFJ 1"'Ifl f -I .0 Z n n d (Ivprea�� ,"' - If -41k--MidWN 4 ; IONA �� Bridge Ramp Height = At Grade I K _ a w. -- Bridge Ramp Height = 2' Max %= _ ,� Bridge Ramp Height - 5' Max Hill:yam '� - _ --------I - 0 �1 Bridge Ramp Height = 11 Max - �?`'a IOW 1 I. Bridge Ramp Height = 17' Max t s gel'' Bridge m Height=2 M z d e Ramp 3 ax ,- Bridge Ramp Height = 29' Max Oa - Bridge Ramp Height = 32' Max , d I •Y Bridge Ramp Height = 35' Max -------------------- — i A 1 r+ is -_ Line of Sight O minimum tree height of 17' would block line of sight Bridge Ramp Viewing Height 17' Height 17' Line of Sight OB A minimum tree height of 21' would block line of sight Bridge Ramp Viewing Height 26' Height 17' �\ \ Line of Sight O \ \ \ \ \ A minimum tree \ height of 10' would \ block line of signt Bridge Ramp Height 33' 1 AW . �• II t =1 w rr + w =I ✓! r a, r r�N r++ i � ' 4 � r; T Viewing Height 6' 3/3/2021 IMMOKALEE ROAD CORRIDOR CONGESTION STUDY PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT SURVEY Coder County IMMOKALEE ROAD CORRIDOR CONGESTION STUDY PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT SURVEY Note: You are NOT required to respond to all questions to submit feedback. 00, M ` ryyr� • �. )C S..' its• 4 - -y i ti� I r GuffrerGour[tvY acvbs -r _ _ �r Proposed Conceptual L e. .L .. t 1. Livingston Rd. and Immokalee Rd. Intersection: The proposed recommendation is a SPUI/Overpass with Livingston Rd. going over Immokalee Rd. The traffic operations on Immokalee Rd. would remain relatively similar to what they are today. For reference, there is a similar SPUlloverpass located at Golden Gate Pkwy. and Airport -Pulling Rd., in Collier County. Do you have any comments regarding this recommendation? https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/338CB6M 1/6 3/3/2021 IMMOKALEE ROAD CORRIDOR CONGESTION STUDY PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT SURVEY �i W E`J 2 V a oil? 2. 1-75 Interchange: The proposed improvement is a Diverging Diamond Interchange (DDI). For reference, there is a similar Diverging Diamond Interchange located at 1-75 and University Pkwy., Exit 213, in Sarasota County. There is one in progress at 1-75 and Colonial Blvd., Exit 136, in Fort Myers. Have you driven through one? OYes O No O1 don't know Do you have any comments regarding this recommendation? https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/338CB6M 2/6 IMMOKALEE ROAD CORRIDOR CONGESTION STUDY PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT SURVEY 3/3/2021 Iff 3. Logan Blvd. and Immokalee Rd. Intersection: The proposed recommendation is a Partial Displaced Left Turn (or Partial Continuous Flow Intersection). For reference, there is a similar Partial Displaced Left Turn intersection located at Daniels Pkwy. and State Rd. 82, in Lee County. Do you have any comments regarding this recommendation? 4. How often do you use the study corridor (Immokalee Rd. between Livingston Rd. and Logan Blvd.)? LJ Everyday OAt least once a week OAt least once a month OLess than once a month 5. How often do you use the intersections within this study area? https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/338CB6M 3/6 ■ ■ + / ■ / ■ • / - • / 4� ,�?` �.. `fir' „�. r1 Mile Radius From Corridor ° I 441 lnnn LLI ca �:`��:e��iT.€�„m� a'��c _ � `'s� gyp- �-.�.� :y1t• :�� ,�M,,.;�.:;_a' �, �^ ',�j`;:4."�.1�.,yi is-rii ,rL_j::.� ..-. .•A� c�l � ��. �� FFFF _ a:.- � wa�a:�kr -f 3. I�� x+F;. � Z a�..�'�' Y':47 •Q' J1 J N .' �,. ' �_s . IMOlCALEE FtD JV �^ � z` •= ° . a lid m I dim ,. It iax�,, �r a , ,.-.;,�e V_,=-��-•_ ��L,-mow. W Q %11�Z. Of"!si�i'�_��+'f� Legend 1111M. r Lim it M":.. -I/ iF£F�••zF Inn i- Qi .. f .. .. A:�` •� • -.i... a6a a..... — sse.-..,f� 3/3/2021 IMMOKALEE ROAD CORRIDOR CONGESTION STUDY PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT SURVEY 6. Do you live within 1 mile of the study area? OYes O No 7. Do you work within 1 mile of the study area? OYes O No 8. Do you consider yourself a "Year -Round" or "Seasonal" resident? OYear -Round Resident OSeasonal Resident 9. How did you hear about the study and survey? OCollier County website OSocial media ODirect notification from HOA, friend, neighbor, etc.... 10. Do you have any other comments regarding the study? I Done Powered by et SurveyMonkey® See how easy it is to create a survey. Privacy & Cookie Policy https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/338CB6M 5/6 3/3/2021 IMMOKALEE ROAD CORRIDOR CONGESTION STUDY PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT SURVEY https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/338CB6M 6/6 Appendix E.2 Project Notifications - Email Blasts - Social Media Posts - Commissioner Newsletter - District Three Town Hall Website Capture - Coffee with a Commissioner meeting minutes - Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study Virtual Public Information Meeting Question & Answer Session Email Invitation From: LentzLorralne To: GIrby, Felicia Subject [EXTERNAL] FW: Immokalee Rd. Corridor Congestion Study Date: Thursday, April 8, 20214:19:42 PM Attachments: irr-001.ono oe00zma Mailing List.xlsx EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Hi Felicia, I sent the email below to the 5 private schools you gave me the contact info. for plus these 5 agency representatives: CCPS: Tom Eastman Lt. Thomas Orr Lt. Neal Bohannon Sal D'Angelo Chief Tabatha Butcher CCPS CCSO - District 1 CCSO - District 2 North Naples Fire and Rescue EMS I am not authorized to contact any CCPS principal directly, all correspondence must 1st go to Tom Eastman. Thanks! Lorraine Lorraine M. Lantz, AICP Principal Planner inch Collier County Logo 1200 dpi ■❑ Collier County Capital Projects, Planning. Impact Fees & Program Management NOTE: Email Address Has Changed 2685 S. Horseshoe Drive, Suite #103 Naples, FL 34104 Phone, (239)252-5779 Lorraine. LantzoCollierCountvFLoov From: Lantz Lorraine Sent: Thursday, April 8, 2021 3:49 PM Subject: Immokalee Rd. Corridor Congestion Study EwtmanTh(@coll erschoDIs.com 239-252-9100 thomas.orr2@mlliersheriff.ore 239-455-3121 neal.bohannonPcolliersheriff.ore SDAnaelo northcollierfire.com Tabatha. Butcher(cDcolliercountyfl.aov As you may have heard, we are conducting the Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study from Livingston Road to Logan Boulevard. We believe you may have an interest in the study corridor. We have developed a narrated presentation that discusses and explains the recommended improvements at each intersection and other proposed improvements. Link to video Immokalee Congestion Study Video You may also view the recommendations on the project website at: https�//www.colliercountvfl.gov/plann ngstudies (under "Current— Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study'). • A: Livingston Rd. —Convert to a Single Point Urban Interchange (SPUI) also know as an Overpass (Livingston to go over Immokalee) • B: Juliet Blvd./Strand Blvd. — Widen bridge along southbound side of intersection, add turn lanes and increase left turn lane lengths • C: Southbound On/Off Ramps 1-75— Convert to a Diverging Diamond Interchange (DDI) • D: Northbound On/Off Ramps 1-75— Convert to a Diverging Diamond Interchange (DDI) • E: Northbrooke Dr./Tarpon Bay Blvd. — Widen bridge along southbound side of intersection, add turn lanes and increase left turn lane lengths • F: Oakes Blvd. — Restripe existing lanes to add through/right turn lane and increase left turn lane length • G: Valewood Dr. — Restripe existing lanes to add through/right turn lane and add dedicated right turn lane • H: Executive Dr. — Restripe existing lanes to add through/right turn lane • I: Logan Blvd. — Reconstruct the interchange to include a Partial Displaced Left Turn (PDLT) along Immokalee Road Please let us know if you would like to meet or discuss the recommendations and how they could impact your current operations. Respectfully, Lorraine Lorraine M. Lantz, AICP Principal Planner inch Collier County Logo 1200 dpi 0 Collier County Capital Projects, Planning, Impact Fees & Program Management NOTE: Email Address Has Changed 2685 S. Horseshoe Drive, Suite #103 Naples, FL 34104 Phone:'231,212-1111 Lorraine. _.mt .COIIIerCOUntvFL.aav Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released In response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. raa tl M: Ina', sn-, —sin �mtlor �nrm tl rntlay, ryrii 16, 2o2t 6:n2:v un AnaTmemr. jmap¢�}jpp Imaac4al.lpg EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Lorraine M. Lantz, AICP Principal Planner inch Collier County Logo 1200 dpi Ceem Ceunly CnPuw Pn jech. Pranning, Impncl 117r1$EFSI�i From: MCLaughlinAnne <Anne.McLaughlin@colliercountyfl.goy> Seat. Friday, April 16, 20217:40 AM R: OteroBrandy <Brandy.Otero@colliercountyfl.gov>; ScottTrinity <Trinity.Scott@colliercountyfl.gov>; Lantzl orraine <Lorraine. Lantz@col liercountyfl.gov> Subject: FW: Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study Good morning CAC members and Ms. Peters, Forwarding an informational email from Collier County regarding the Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study. Regards, Anne McLaughlin Executive Director 0 Office: 239-252-5884 Ce11: 239-919-4378 2885 South Horseshoe Dr. Naples, FL 34104 collier a anenl�r the rv-nv From: LantzLorraine <LorraineLantzlacolliercountvfl eov> SeM: Wednesday, April 14, 20213:37 PM Subject: Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study Good Afternoon, We are contacting you because of your potential interest Collier County's Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study. Intersections Studied Nine intersections are being studied along the corridor (labeled "A" through "I"). Please reference the project aerial with highlighted squares for the location of each intersection. The following summarizes the recommended solution for each intersection. • A: Livingston Rd. — Convert to a Single Point Urban Interchange (SPUI) commonly known as an Overpass. The recommendation is to bridge Livingston Road over Immokalee Road. The bridge is proposed as 4 lanes (2 lanes in each direction). An additional southbound left turn at Livingston Road is also proposed. Through traffic along Livingston Road would not be required to stop, improving the traffic operations at this intersection. This is similar to the intersection a/ Golden Gate Parkway and Airport Road, where Golden Gate Parkway goes over Airport Road. • B: Jul'et Blvd./Strand Blvd. — Widen the bridge along the southbound side of intersection, add turn lanes and increase the length of the left turn lanes. C and D: I-751nterehanggfSouthbountl and Northbound On/ON Ramos 117 ) — Convert to a Diverging Diamond Interchange (DDI). For this recommendation traffic patterns will only change along Immokalee Road; there will be no change to [he baffic pattern on I-75. Traffic on Immokalee Road will shift (or diverge) to the opposite side of the road as it passes under 1-75 and will be controlled by a traffic signal. A DDI configuration is unusual in that it requires traffic to briefly drive on the opposite side of the road (in this case while under 1-75). Large overhead signs, barriers and/or pavement markings will be used to direct traffic. DDIs are becoming more popular in Florida, as they are an innovative solution to reduce delay and increase mobility and safety. There is a fully operational DDI at 1-75 and University Parkway in Sarasota. FDOT is currently constructing a DDI at 1-75 and Colonial Boulevard in Fort Myers. • E: Northbrooke Dr.Ramon Bay Blvd. — Widen the bridge along the southbound side of intersection, add turn lanes and increase the length of the left turn lanes. • F: Oakes Blvd. — Restripe existing lanes to add through/right turn lane and increase the length of the left turn lanes. G: Valewood Dr. — Restripe existing lanes to add through/right turn lane and dedicated right turn lane. • H, Executive Dr. — Restripe existing lanes to add through/right turn lane. 1: Logan Blvd. — Reconstruct the intersection to include a Partial Displaced Left Tom (PDLT) also known as a Continuous Flow Intersection (CFI) along Immokalee Road. The PDLT reconfigures the roadway by allowing vehicles to cross to the left side of the roadway before the intersection, which allows for multiple traffic movements that are not possible at conventional signalized intersections. This improvement will increase signal efficiency by allowing for longer green times at each leg of the intersection. Some of the recommended intersection solutions above are innovative for this area. To find out more about the intersections or to see the conceptual designs and simulated animations demonstrating how a vehicle moves through the more complicated intersections, please view the following video: Immokalee (<pllgesfon Stud_v V can The video is approximately 30 minutes long. If you prefer not to watch the entire video, it is bookmarked so that you can skip to the intersection(s) you are most concerned about. The video is also available on the project website located at: hi //www coll encauntyfl.gov/planningstudies (under "Current— Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study"). The study is expected to be completed in the late Spring of 2021. Next Steps The Collier County Board of County Commissioners (BCC) is expected to hear this item at a regularly scheduled BCC meeting in the late Spring of 2021. When a final date is determined it will be placed on the project website located at: httosy/www colFercoun(yjl,gov/d.m ngatudies (under "Current— Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study"). All BCC Meetings are open to the public. They begin at 9:00 AM and am held in the BCC Chambers located on the 3rd Floor of the Collier County Government Center, 3299 Tamiami Trail East, Naples, FL 34112, If these recommendations move forward, the County will work towards funding them in the capital improvement budget. The following projects were identified in the Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) as cost feasible for design and construction in the following time periods: • 1-75/Immokalee Road Interchange between 2026-2030 (in coordination with the Florida Department of Transportation - FDOT) • Livingston Road and Immokalee Road Intersection between 2026-2030 • Immokalee Road and Logan Boulevard Intersection between 2031-4045 These timeframes are subject to change as funding and transportation needs change. Should you have any questions on this project, please contact Lorraine Lantz at Lorraine Lant @CollierCountyFL.gov or at 239-252-5779 Respectfully, Lorraine Lorraine M. Lantz, AICP Principal Planner inch Collier County Logo 1200 dpi COINer Coonly C.P-Projects, Planning, Impact Peer a Program Management -re —aam—Cboegea 2605 S. Horseshoe Drive, Suite X10a Nnples, FL U104 Ph.— 5779 EL Under Florida Law, -ail addresses are public recerds. If you do not want your -ail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. From: LantzLorraine To: Sal D"Angelo Cc: Gramer. Bill/SWF; Kirby, Felicia Subject: [EXTERNAL] Immokalee Rd. Corridor Congestion Study Date: Tuesday, April 6, 2021 3:54:53 PM Attachments: image001.png EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Hi Sal, As you may have heard, we are conducting the Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study from Livingston Road to Logan Boulevard. We believe Station #42 is within the study corridor. This Corridor Study is similar to the recently completed Pine Ridge Corridor Study, because there are several innovative intersections considered. We have developed a narrated presentation that discusses and explains the recommended improvements at each intersection and other proposed improvements. Link to video Immokalee Congestion Study Video You may also view the recommendations on the project website at: https://www.colliercountyfl.gov/planningstudies (under "Current — Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study'). • A: Livingston Rd. — Convert to a Single Point Urban Interchange (SPUI) also know as an Overpass (Livingston to go over Immokalee) • B: Juliet Blvd./Strand Blvd. — Widen bridge along southbound side of intersection, add turn lanes and increase left turn lane lengths • C: Southbound On/Off Ramps 1-75 — Convert to a Diverging Diamond Interchange (DDI) • D: Northbound On/Off Ramps 1-75 — Convert to a Diverging Diamond Interchange (DDI) • E: Northbrooke Dr./Tarpon Bay Blvd. — Widen bridge along southbound side of intersection, add turn lanes and increase left turn lane lengths • F: Oakes Blvd. — Restripe existing lanes to add through/right turn lane and increase left turn lane length • G: Valewood Dr. — Restripe existing lanes to add through/right turn lane and add dedicated right turn lane • H: Executive Dr. — Restripe existing lanes to add through/right turn lane • I: Logan Blvd. — Reconstruct the interchange to include a Partial Displaced Left Turn (PDLT) along Immokalee Road Please let us know if you, the Chief or anyone from the station would like to meet or discuss the recommendations and how they could impact your current operations. Respectfully, Lorraine Lorraine M. Lantz, AICP Principal Planner Q I �T C014ftty Collier County Capital Projects, Planning, Impact Fees & Program Management NOTE: Email Address Has Changed 2685 S. Horseshoe Drive, Suite #103 Naples, FL 34104 Phone: (239) 252-5779 Lorraine. Lantz@CollierCountyFL.aov Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. I� sukl«e Runny RE! rmmoralee Rwd eras., Qna—scu 9, 202r 5:12:38 Pn Rtrxamemr. ImapeP43Jpp JP EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links Thank you very much Sue -we appreciate Al Respectfully, Lorraine Lorraine M. Lantz, AICP Principal Planner 3 inch Collier County Logo 1200 dpi c—eoonty Cvpaar P 8't•�td'Pi From: FilsonSue <Sue.F11s.n@col1wcountyfl.gov> Sent: Monday, April 19, 20215:01 PM To: LantzLorraine <Lorraine.Lantz@colliercountvfl.g.v Subject: RE: Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study I will be happy to distribute for you. Sue From: LantzLorraine <I nrraine anrr(alr:nllierrnnnrNl Sem: Monday, April 19, 20214:54 Pe Subject: Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study Good Afternoon, Transportation Planning is currently the Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study. The Study corridor on Immokalee Rd. is from Livingston Rd. to Logan Blvd. There are several innovative intersections recommended along the corridor as briefly discussed below. We have developed a video to help residents find out more about the intersections and to see the conceptual designs and simulated animations of the more complicated intersections. The video can be viewed at the following link: Immokalee Congeston Stud_v Vdeo The video is approximately 30 minutes long and it is bookmarked so that anyone interested can skip to the intersection(s) they are most concerned about. The video is also available on the project website located at: https //www coll ercountytl.gov/olanningstudies (under "Current- Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study"). We are hoping that you could assist us in distributing this information to those who might be interested in it via your distribution lists, newsletters, etc. Thank you for your help. Respectfully, Lorraine Intersections Studied Immokalee Imersectlon Corridor Map Nine intersections are being studied along the corridor (labeled "A" through "I"). Please reference the project aerial with highlighted squares for the location of each intersection. The following summarizes the recommended solution for each intersection. . A: Livingston Rd. - Convert to a Single Point Urban Interchange (SPUI) commonly known as an Overpass. The recommendation is to bridge Livingston Road over Immokalee Road. The bridge is proposed as 4 lanes (2 lanes in each direction). An additional southbound left turn at Livingston Road is also proposed. Through traffic along Livingston Road would not be required to stop, improving the traffic operations at this intersection. This is similar to the intersection at Golden Gate Parkway and Airport Road, where Golden Gate Parkway goes over Airport Road. B: Julie[ Blvd./Strand Blvd. - Widen the bridge along the southbound side of intersection, add turn lanes and increase the length of the left turn lanes. C antl D: I-751nterehangafSouthbountl antl Northbountl On/Off RaLDps I-751- Convert to a Diverging Diamond Interchange (DDI). For this recommendation traffic patterns will only change along Immokalee Road; there will be no change to the traffic pattern on I-75. Traffic on Immokalee Road will shift (or diverge) to the opposite side of the road as it passes under I-75 and will be controlled by a traffic signal. A DDI configuration is unusual in that it requires traffic to briefly drive on the opposite side of the road (in this case while under 1-75). Large overhead signs, barriers and/or pavement markings will be used to direct traffic. DDIs are becoming more popular in Florida, as they are an innovative solution to reduce delay and increase mobility and safety. There is a fully operational DDI at 1-75 and University Parkway in Sarasota. FDOT is currently constrocting a DDI at 1-75 and Colonial Boulevard in Fort Myers. • E: Northhrooke Dr.rtarpo^ Bay Blvd. - Widen the bridge along the southbound side of intersection, add turn lanes and increase the length of the left turn lanes. • F: Oakes Blvd. - Restripe existing lanes to add through/right turn lane and increase the length of the left turn lanes. G: Valewood Dr. - Restripe existing lanes to add through/right turn lane and dedicated right turn lane. • H, Executive Dr. - Restripe existing lanes to add through/right turn lane. I: Logan Blvd, - Reconstruct the intersection to include a Partial Displaced Left Turn (PDLT) also known as a Continuous Flow Intersection (CFI) along Immokalee Road. The PDLT reconfigures the roadway by allowing vehicles to cross to the left side of the roadway before the intersection, which allows for multiple traffic movements that are not possible at conventional signalized intersections. This improvement will increase signal efficiency by allowing for longer green times at each leg of the intersection. Some of the recommended intersection solutions above are innovative for this area. To find out more about the intersections or to see the conceptual designs and simulated animations demonstrating how a vehicle moves through the more complicated intersections, please view the following video: Immokalee Congeston tidy Video The video is approximately 30 minutes long. If you prefer not to watch the entire video, it is bookmarked so that you can skip to the intersection(s) you are most concerned about. The video is also available on the project website located at: httos:/Ainva olliercounp9,gov/olanningstudias (under "Current - Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study"). The study is expected to be completed in the late Spring of 2021. Next Steps The Collier County Board of County Commissioners (BCC) is expected to hear this item at a regularly scheduled BCC meeting in the late Spring of 2021. When a final date is determined it will be placed on the project website located at: httos //www toll'ercountytLgov/olann'ngstud'es (under'Curmnt- Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study"). All BCC Meetings are open to the public. They begin at 9:00 AM and are held in the BCC Chambers located on the 3rd Floor of the Collier County Government Center, 3299 Tamiami Trail East, Naples, FL 34112. If these recommendations move forward, the County will work towards funding them in the capital improvement budget. The following projects were identified in the Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) as cost feasible for design and construction in the following time periods: • 1-75/Immokalee Road Interchange between 2026-2030 (in coordination with the Florida Department of Transportation - FDOT) • Livingston Road and Immokalee Road Intersection between 2026-2030 • Immokalee Road and Logan Boulevard Intersection between 2031-4045 These timeframes are subject to change as funding and transportation needs change. Should you have any questions on this project, please contact Lorraine Lantz at Forra ne LantzdColferCountvFF cov or at 239-252-5779. Respectfully, Lorraine Lorraine M. Lantz, AICP Principal Planner inch Collier County Logo 1200 dpi H Collier Coanty Cppsss Pro)-b. Planning, rnnp-F— a Program management -11. Email AtlMeFF Has Chpngetl — s. Horseshoe Drive, sWte %let -plev FL -04 Ph.—(2a9)252-5779 EL — Under Florida Law, a -mail atltlresses are public records. If you do not want your a -mail adi released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in venting. From: LantzLorraine Subject: [EXTERNAL] Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study Date: Monday, March 22, 2021 10:39:27 AM Attachments: image001.Dno image002.ioa Good Morning, We are contacting you because of your potential interest in the Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study we are conducting. The Collier County Transportation Planning Section is conducting the Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study to evaluate concepts for intersection improvements along Immokalee Road. The study limits are from Livingston Road to Logan Boulevard. Immokalee Road provides regional east - west connectivity across Collier County. This section of Immokalee Road is constrained by development along both sides of the road as well the Cocohatchee Canal to the north, and therefore widening the road is not feasible. This study is considering alternative intersection solutions including grade -separated intersections and modern traffic signal coordination. The proposed improvements are anticipated to enhance traffic operations and safety concerns based on current and future travel demands. Intersection improvements are proposed at: 0 • A: Livingston Rd. — Convert to a Single Point Urban Interchange (SPUI) • B: Juliet Blvd./Strand Blvd. — Widen bridge along southbound side of intersection, add turn lanes and increase left turn lane lengths • C: Southbound On/Off Ramps 1-75 — Convert to a Diverging Diamond Interchange (DDI) • D: Northbound On/Off Ramps 1-75 — Convert to a Diverging Diamond Interchange (DDI) • E: Northbrooke Dr./Tarpon Bay Blvd. —Widen bridge along southbound side of intersection, add turn lanes and increase left turn lane lengths • F: Oakes Blvd. — Restripe existing lanes to add through/right turn lane and increase left turn lane length • G: Valewood Dr. — Restripe existing lanes to add through/right turn lane and add dedicated right turn lane • H: Executive Dr. — Restripe existing lanes to add through/right turn lane • I: Logan Blvd. — Reconstruct the interchange to include a Partial Displaced Left Turn (PDLT) along Immokalee Road The County would appreciate all interested parties to participate in a short online survey and provide comments on the project by no later than April 16, 2021. More information on the project including the online survey and a narrated presentation can be found on the project website at: https://www.colliercountyfl.gov/planningstudies (under "Current — Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study"). Should you have any questions on this project, please contact Lorraine Lantz at Lorraine. Lantz(@CollierCountyFL.gov or at 239-252-5779. Respectfully, Lorraine Lorraine M. Lantz, AICP Principal Planner inch Collier County Logo 1200 dpi ®❑ Collier County Capital Projects, Planning, Impact Fees & Program Management NOTE: Email Address Has Changed 2685 S. Horseshoe Drive, Suite #103 Naples, FL 34104 Phone: (239) 252-5779 Lorraine. Lantz@CollierCountyFL.gov Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. n�ae,rNna9�..eme�aaare�e, n ,�re�ms 99ao�a. ,�99m��9aare,.rp�ee.•a�� sue.• r9e,rre�rd 9,.ao�o„•�,e�e�m��ma�mN�,•n,a9�n„99a.��„��sp�<9D9,9�Po9a,nw 9 From: LantzLorraine Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 20213:37 PM Subject: Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study Good Afternoon, We are contacting you because of your potential interest Collier County's Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study. Intersections Studied Immokalee Intersection Corridor Map Nine intersections are being studied along the corridor (labeled "A" through "I"). Please reference the project aerial with highlighted squares for the location of each intersection. The following summarizes the recommended solution for each intersection. . A: Livingston Rd. —Convert to a Single Point Urban Interchange (SPUI) commonly known as an Overpass. The recommendation is to bridge Livingston Road over Immokalee Road. The bridge is proposed as 4lanes (2 lanes in each direction). An additional southbound left turn at Livingston Road is also proposed. Through traffic along Livingston Road would not be required to stop, improving the traffic operations at this intersection. This is similar to the intersection at Golden Gate Parkway and Airport Road, where Golden Gate Parkway goes over Airport Road. • B: Jul'et BIvd.IStrand Blvd — Widen the bridge along the southbound side of intersection, add turn lanes and increase the length of the left turn lanes. • E: Northbrooke Dr./Tarnon Bay Blvd, — Widen the bridge along the southbound side of intersection, add turn lanes and increase the length of the left turn lanes. • i Oakes Blvd. — Restripe existing lanes to add through/right turn lane and increase the length of the left turn lanes. G: Valewood Dr. — Resnlpe existing lanes to add through/right turn lane and dedicated night turn lane. I Executive Dr-- Restripe existing lanes to add through/right turn lane. C and D: 1-75 Interchange (Southbound and Northbound On/Off Ramps 1-75) — Convert to a Diverging Diamond Interchange (DDI). For this recommendation tmffic patterns will only change along Immokalee Road; there will be no change to the traffic pattern on 1-75. Traffic on Immokalee Road will shift (or diverge) to the opposite side of the road as it passes under I-75 and will be controlled by a traffic signal. A DID configuration is unusual in Sometbi'EVI�g@f,'lSRiff�(tfel4 Aki��'eL�41YPn33N]PtdiR�°eb'�Pv€i$i�(rFN&59i19�iPoV4Ai;?aiee'.hi�dYNi@rdih�T�r��18ifFftllC�$f��r�c�'�S'Sadi AS'� fl�ecBAB�SIIS'�!'�yyHs'�a114Ses'�rfRtf�i@81$I�IFatiB l��RibA&A°a'1f7�'RB� @�I@lir�lls' move�lflf'9AgAstlVLpdhaS�i01A�AL'@I�'@r9AS2rbNbFPs'?yA€5Yi2PPtHLc9"oAFKVfA4,}WI'VrAIS€IR'aiECPdA, S41rj�rG84(POW4Ei91ASb-Tirtt`2PA§fg�Y�fS1iM�i�b'f4rSAfAT§WTyIitFBiS1`fifdtRstWSi9ft122hAFb-Zrrtl it is booknqRKWA@qi IEErl intersection(s) you are most concerned about. The video is also available on the project website located at: httos U/ colliercountyiLgov/olanningstudies (under "Current— Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study"). The study is expected to be completed in the late Spring of 2021. Next Steps The Collier County Board of County Commissioners (BCC) is expected to hear this item at a regularly scheduled BCC meeting in the late Spring of 2021. When a final date is determined it will be placed on the project website llocated at hi //www colrercountyfl,gov/olann'ngstud'es (under "Current —I mmokelee RoadCorridorCongestion Study"). All BCC Meetings are open to the public. They begin at 9:00 AM and are held in the BCC Chambers ocale�.grb3��doorlq� IEb�ls�tft��Af1�9{i{$Ys�&Y&riRB'ff1�IrirPr!'�61$�aS�l@htr€f�{(ru��lslo�c`flb�lt as a Continuous Flow Intersection (Cl along Immokalee Road. The PDLT reconfigures the roadway by allowing hesi"$ iPS fFAeF5H3VWo�%ftf519PaRI,4Mer@A$W$%b1theintersectionnA6H9fh@�hAI14WeLdpS[kll{R�rNs�(iFehllYP&lfcR! Pdlf&dAEgA3 iis�3�@11%S411A@@Ii5lA4�IL'BR�i Safi l4@isT lfBA�YSS��E17�f f 3i�e5dIIA A�I°iency desigri�Xrr711@YM9gtfi@SilRp(ipRRr4�fbWfilkj;l�6@�iilA&of the intersection. • 1-75/Immokalee Road Interchange between 2026-2030 (in coordination with the Florida Department of Transportation - FDOT) • Livingston Road and Immokalee Road Intersection between 2026-2030 • Immokalee Road and Logan Boulevard Intersection between 2031-4045 These timeframes are subject to change as funding and transportation needs change. Should you have any questions on this project, please contact Lorraine Lantz at Lorra ne Lant (cbColl'erCountvFL cov or at 239-252-5779. Respecttully, Lormine Lorraine M. Lantz, AICP Principal Planner inch Collier County Logo 1111 dpi Cplflw County Capital-tecls,-nnrng. Impact fees a hogrpm Management NOR: Empa AaMess Has capnge — 5. Nwseshpe Drive, 5— Nl. Naples,Ra— PM1pne:12397252-5779 sugem Fnd" rvnE] unmokaieer:t:uab arrm eorgeseon sway fury z, zozS 9:rb PN Atnamem.. Good afternoon, I am contacting you because of your continued interest Collier County's Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study. Please note that the project website has been updated to include more visualization graphics of the presentation materials. We also added additional frequently asked questions. The Study is tentatively scheduled for presentation to the Collier County Board of County Commissioners in September 2021. The project video and survey are still available on the project website located at: hdos //www.QQIlie=untvfl.goviplanningstudies (under "Current— Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study"). Intersections included in the Study Should you have any questions on this project or would like additional information, please contact me at Lorraine Lantz(cDColl'erCountyFL aov or at 239-252-5779. Respectfully, Lorraine Lorraine M. Lantz, AICP Principal Planner Copier County Collier County Cnpow-jecfs, Planning. Impact Eeer 6. Program Management NOTE: E—Atltlresr Has Ch—d 2605 S. Ho e rive, Suite— uite M10.0 Neplez,F 3A106 ne: (2.597252-5779 EL — From: Kirby, Felicia <Felicia.Kirby2l@jacobs.com> Sent: Friday, March 19, 2021 2:20 PM To: Simpron, Christopher <Christopher.Simpron(@dot.state.fl.us> Cc: Gramer, Bill/SWF <Bill.Gramer(@acobs.com> Subject: 1-75 Interchange and Immokalee Road {Collier County} EXTERNAL SENDER: Use caution with links and attachments. Good afternoon Chris, We (Jacobs) were recently hired by Collier County Transportation Planning to perform a Corridor Congestion Study along Immokalee Road, from Livingston Rd to Logan Blvd. The study included the I- 75 interchange (Exit 111) along Immokalee Rd. We would like to please meet with you and discuss results of our study regarding the 1-75 interchange. The study findings have just been released on the Collier County Transportation website at the link below (see "Current — Immokalee Rd Corridor Congestion Study"), which includes a video presentation of the recommendations. https://www.colliercountyfl.gov/your-government/divisions- s-z/transportation-planning/planning-studies Do you have availability next week to discuss via conference call? If so, could you please provide a variety of dates/times so that I may coordinate with the County to be in attendance? Thank you. Respectfully, Felicia Kirby, El, PMP I Jacobs I Transportation Engineer M:407.369.3318 Felicia. Kirby2�iacobs.com 5801 Pelican Bay Blvd, Suite 505 1 Naples, FL 34108 1 US jacob S NOTICE - This communication may contain confidential and privileged information that is for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any viewing, copying or distribution of, or reliance on this message by unintended recipients is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. NOTICE - This communication may contain confidential and privileged information that is for the sole use of the intended recipient. Any viewing, copying or distribution of, or reliance on this message by unintended recipients is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from your computer. «E ��I'ar T d Qsr ss. aad, ThurstlaY� Mril ", 202r 2:"," rn anxamemr. EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Cent= this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. St. Crux Apartment Office Manager, We are contacting you because of your potential interest Collier Countys Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study. Intersections Studied Immokalee Intersection Corridor Map Nine intersections are being studied along the corridor (labeled "A" through "I•). Please reference the project aerial with highlighted squares for the location of each intersection. The following summarizes the recommended solution for each intersection. . A: Livingston Rd. — Convert to a Single Point Urban Interchange (SPUI) commonly known as an Overpass. The recommendation is to bridge Livingston Road over Immokalee Road. The bridge is proposed as 4 lanes (2 lanes in each direction). An additional southbound left turn at Livingston Road is also proposed. Through traffic along Livingston Road would not be required to stop, improving the traffic operations at this intersection. This is similar to the intersection at Golden Gate Parkway and Airport Road, where Golden Gate Parkway goes over Airport Road. e: Juliet BIvd.IStrand 61vtl. — Widen the bridge along the southbound side of intersection, add turn lanes and increase the length of the left turn lanes. . C and D, 1-75 InterchanggfSouthbound and Northbound On/Off Ramps 6751— Convert to a Diverging Diamond Interchange (DDI). For this recommendation traffic patterns will only change along Immokalee Road; there will be no change to the traffic pattern on 1-75. Traffic on Immokalee Road will shift (or diverge) to the opposite side of the road as it passes under I-75 and will be controlled by a traffic signal. A DDI configuration is unusual in that it requires traffic to briefly drive on the opposite side of the road (in this case while under I-75). Large overhead signs, barriers and/or pavement markings will be used to direct traffic. DDIs are becoming more popular in Florida, as they are an innovative solution to reduce delay and increase mobility and safety. There is a fully operational DDI at 1-75 and University Parkway in Sarasota. FDOT is currently constructing a DDI at I-75 and Colonial Boulevard in Fort Myers. • E, Northbrooke Dr /Tarpon Bay Blvd. — Widen the bridge along the southbound side of intersection, add turn lanes and increase the length of the left turn lanes. F: Oakes Blvd. — Restripe existing lanes to add through/right turn lane and increase the length of the left turn lanes. G: Valewood Dr. — Restripe existing lanes to add through/right turn lane and dedicated right turn lane. H: Executive Dr. — Restripe existing lanes to add through/right turn lane. . I: Logan Blvd, — Reconstruct the intersection to include a Partial Displaced Left Turn (PDLT) also known as a Continuous Flow Intersection (CFI) along Immokalee Road. The PDLT reconfigures the roadway by allowing vehicles to cross to the left side of the roadway before the intersection, which allows for multiple traffic movements that are not possible at conventional signalized intersections. This improvement will increase signal efficiency by allowing for longer green times at each leg of the intersection. Some of the recommended intersection solutions above are innovative for this area. To find out more about the intersections or to see the conceptual designs and simulated animations demonstrating how a vehicle moves through the more complicated intersections, please view the following video: Immokalee Congestion Study Video The video is approximately 30 minutes long. If you prefer not to watch the entire video, it is bookmarked so that you can skip to the intersection(s) you are most concerned about. The video is also available on the project website located at: httosi/www colfercountyFl gov/olanri ngstudies (under "Current — Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study"). The study is expected to be completed in the late Spring of 2021. Next Steps The Collier County Board of County Commissioners (BCC) is expected to hear this item at a regularly scheduled BCC meeting in the early summer of 2021. When a final date is determined it will be placed on the project websits located at: httosl/www.colliemounI ,v/ol,nninastudies (under "Current— Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study"). All BCC Meetings are open to the public. They begin at 9:00 AM and are held in the BCC Chambers located on the 3rd Floor of the Collier County Government Center, 3299 Tennison Trail East, Naples, FL 34112. If these recommendations move forward, the County will work towards funding them in the capital improvement budget. The following projects were identified in the Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) as cost feasible for design and construction in the following time periods: • 1-75/Immokalee Road Interchange between 2026-2030 (in coordination with the Florida Department of Transportation - FOOT) • Livingston Road and Immokalee Road Intersection between 2026-2030 • Immokalee Road and Logan Boulevard Intersection between 20314045 These timefremes are subject to change as funding and transportation needs change. Should you have any questions on this project or would like to request a presentation, please contact Lorraine Lantz at Lorna ine.LanizrlC011iarCountvFL aov or at 239-252-5779. Respectfully, Lormine Lorraine M. Lantz, AICP Principal Planner inch Collier County Logo1200dpi Ceem Ceumy CCPaer Psejech. Pranning, rmP—fees a Regmm Management NOiE. Email Atltlren aas CM1angeC e OrI-Sulte Ha Naples, fL 34104 Phone: (2]g)a5 endx Fbnde Law, e-mau addresses p rerewm ye do nmw yo email address released in pa eI I, do notsend electronic mailmmis enlny.lnseed, xnlactuis oMme by tekp eainwIng, 6/23/2021 (20+) Collier County Florida - Posts I Facebook Ck li;� E? & + © i Collier County Florida -�0 @CollierGov • Government Organization Home Videos Photos About More J.r Collier County Florida March 24.0 16 Liked q ••• The Collier County Transportation Planning Section is conducting the Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study to evaluate concepts for intersection improvements along Immokalee Road. The study limits are from Livingston Road to Logan Boulevard. This section of Immokalee Road is constrained by development along both sides of the road as well the Cocohatchee Canal to the north, and therefore widening the road is not feasible. This study is considering alternative intersection solutions including grade -separated intersections and modern traffic signal coordination. The proposed improvements are anticipated to enhance traffic operations and safety concerns based on current and future travel demands. The County would appreciate all interested parties to participate in a short online survey and provide comments on the project by no later than April 16, 2021. More information on the project including a narrated presentation and online survey can be found on the project website at: https:Hbit.ly/3d2ZsVF (under "Current — Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study'). 074; 63 90 Comments 69 Shares dj Like Q Comment 0 Share 9.1 Write a comment... 40 Most Relevant w Q d 0 https://www.facebook.com/CollierGov/posts/the-collier-county-transportation-planning-section-is-conducting-the-immokalee-r/10159817944459384/ 1/7 6/23/2021 cock (20+) Collier County Florida - Posts I Facebook + Pierre Fregeau Before they built the current "IMPROVEMENTS", studies were conducted by our illustrious traffic Engineers (and it cost a pretty penny to produce those reports). I am sure that their reports showed that the suggested IMPROVEMENTS would resolve all the congestion around that corridor... forever. Now, less than 10 years later, we will need more studies to figure it all out again (read more $millions). Why do we waste so much money on those studies to find out that those "Traffic Engineers" can't even figure out the correct traffic light timing at any corner in the city? Like - Reply - 12w Edited 0* 13 4 5 Replies Bruce Hamels How about a moritorium on larger than individual homes. The utility infrastructures are now at their maximum capabilities. We need engineering to do feasibility studies to determine the capabilities not unknowlegable politicians. Think wisely Naples Like - Reply 12w 0:) 7 10 Kele Santi Good news. Anything will be an improvement. Like Reply - 13w Edited 094 4 5 Replies Kelli Haener West Well they should have built the proper ramp onto and off 175 when they were supposed to before allowing Walmart and Target to take the land. The County has had several attempts to solve this problem and it takes years of more road work to fix nothing b... See More Like Reply 12w 01 1+ 5 Replies Lynne Nichols Scheiner This area has been growing slowly for 25 years. A sign if the times was when Stan Fogg sold all his property. Schools, communities all around being built. 400K to Millions per home. And trucks and cars?? Ft.Lauderdale all over again Like Reply 13w QA 6 Y 3 Replies Rosemarie Sorgenti Just keep lining the road with MORE developments Not an issue at all *... See More Like Reply 12w Kevin Burke Thank you for providing this well -put together and informative presentation. I took the survey and encourage other Collier County residents to do so. Like - Reply - 12w BC Brandy How about not approving any further communities to be built until they want to pay for the infrastructure to support the increased traffic it will cause. Like Reply 12w ID 19 4 3 Replies 18 Lynne Nichols Scheiner Only to Logan? Think again all the way to the fair grounds! Like - Reply 13w II 16 4 2 Replies IDMichael Rivera How about putting an exit on Vanderbilt road? They gotta spend millions on studies for simple ideas it's incredible. Like Reply 12w 03 4 2 Replies IDMichael Rivera How about widening oaks boulevard to 4 lanes how about taking oaks boulevard and running another highway North South to Bonita beach road? Like Reply 12w 01 y 1 Reply IsConnie Bettinger Quit approving more massive development on Immokalee road if it can't be widened Like Reply 12w Margarita Vazquez 951 intersection has to be included. Have more roads connecting traffic like 951 to bta beach rd. Stop new community development until we build the solution. Control https://www.facebook.com/CollierGov/posts/the-collier-county-transportation-planning-section-is-conducting-the-immokalee-r/l0159817944459384/ 2/7 6/23/2021 (20+) Collier County Florida - Posts I Facebook q 0 E? & + © • - Like Reply 12w y 1 Reply Jennifer Small Extend the study to Collier and Immokalee intersection. Like Reply 12w 01 Debbie McCrea You can't keep approving all this development with only two access roads from the estates. What were you all thinking. Like Reply 12w OZ) 14 4 2 Replies Karen Cruce Strickland Voters, pay attention to what your County Commissioners are approving. Developers don't build without the CC approval. Vote them out. �j Like - Reply 12w ID 7 Michael Rivera �l They need a study to see if immokklee road is congested? really? It's being congested for at least the last 7 years.... See More Like Reply 12w 01 Kathy Murphy Build some more out there Like Reply 13w Jan Raisor Essler Open up Collier Blvd. north to Alicolll Like - Reply - 12w 093 `a 3 Replies Jim Hodgdon Any information on when you will be starting work on Price and Barefoot Williams?? Like Reply 12w Enrico Avallone Double decker roads is what we are gonna need soon. 6 lanes going each way will help improve traffic and we won't need to use up more land space. Like - Reply - 12w 093 Justin Chait Stop destroying preserves. This will prevent traffic W Like Reply - 12w 1 Sally Keys The problem is all the building out in the estates, that causing all the mess down this way ,they need to recovert the roads starting out that way better to elevate them all driving up the only 2 ways to get into town!!!! Like - Reply 12w 01 'd 1 Reply Sue Fox LaPiere I for one am so grateful not to live out that way! Terrible congestion every time I have to go that way! Like - Reply - 12w Lee Bostick Stop the development of new gated communities oil Like - Reply - 12w Jean Tho Rose Martine WHERE ARE COLLIER COVID VACCINES A?? 4Y 4 Like Reply 13w Barbara Sowa STOP further approval of development until traffic problems are resolve 08 Like Reply 12w Matt Archer Immokalee road? I always thought it was a skinny parking lot... OVO 4 Like Reply 12w Ramiro Correa What if they make an exit onto 1-75 in Everglades Bulebard and so people living in the states have another alternative to get out of that funnel? 01 Like Reply 12w Martin Rovan Need another "fly over" bridge just like GG parkway at Airport Rd. 05 Like Reply 12w r, Gabriela Porter �• � i 1=+J A https://www.facebook.com/CollierGov/posts/the-collier-county-transportation-planning-section-is-conducting-the-immokalee-r/l0159817944459384/ 3/7 6/23/2021 (20+) Collier County Florida - Posts I Facebook Q � v Kristin Harvey With as much money as this county taxes each one of us yearly you would think our roads would be in much better condition and much better commuting access. The money is going somewhere, but I wonder who's pocket it goes into! Like Reply 12w Jim Delie You! (The County) have approved of all this development! Maybe YOU should do your JOB! And figure it out! That's why we pay TAXES !! Like Reply 12w DD 16 4 2 Replies Matt Leon This section was at once the home to 21 years of straight construction zone build it tear it up build it again tear it up people are starting to wise up to the money laundering machine that government of all levels has become.......I think yo... See More ID 1 Like Reply - 12w Josh Riley Charles You need to connect 951 to Bonita beach Rd. All the traffic from estates are funneled to one area of 1-75 and Immokalee Rd. There needs to be multiple routes up North. This will solve the problem. 05 Like Reply 12w Chuck Andersen Don't need to spend money on a study. Just spend on a fix. we already know traffic in this area sucks. 01 Like Reply 12w John Moriarty Stop the freakin development!! How about that! Stop turning us into the east coast. Really poor planning here. They need another exit to access 75 between Bonita Beach Rd and Corkscrew rd. But the growth hungry commissioners didn't plan for that now d... See More ID 3 Like - Reply - 12w y 1 Reply Mary Ann Marino It's the snow birdsqp study over sa Like Reply 12w 01 Audrey Jake Stop approving all these gated huge developments! Slow it down and work on quality of life, how to improve roads, water quality and the balance with Florida's natural environment. People move away from cities they destroyed just to come to a new pla... See More ID 1 Like Reply 12w 4 1 Reply Margarita Vazquez Count on me Like - Reply - 12w Christopher Cessna Cant even figure out state road 29 and 82 intersection in a rural area.. best of luck OTHER pGS*1 ?r.. hire some better traffic engineers.. you are failing on all levels 01 Like Reply 12w %* 1 Reply Most Relevant is selected, so some comments may have been filtered out. + L https://www.facebook.com/CollierGov/posts/the-collier-county-transportation-planning-section-is-conducting-the-immokalee-r/10159817944459384/ 4/7 6/23/2021 (20+) Collier County Florida - Posts I Facebook q 0 dp & + Z https://www.facebook.com/CollierGov/posts/the-collier-county-transportation-planning-section-is-conducting-the-immokalee-r/10159817944459384/ 5/7 6/23/2021 (20+) Collier County Florida - Posts I Facebook q 0 dp & + Z https://www.facebook.com/CollierGov/posts/the-collier-county-transportation-planning-section-is-conducting-the-immokalee-r/10159817944459384/ 6/7 6/23/2021 (20+) Collier County Florida - Posts I Facebook q 0 d? 5 + Z https://www.facebook.com/CollierGov/posts/the-collier-county-transportation-planning-section-is-conducting-the-immokalee-r/10159817944459384/ 7/7 6/23/2021 CollierPIO on Twitter: "Visit the Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study (from Livingston Rd to Logan Blvd) virtual public meeting for F Tweet Q Search Twitter Q Home 3-% CollierP10 @CollierPIO Mar 24 ••• A, Visit the Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study (from Livingston Rd to Logan Blvd) virtual public meeting for results of our study, including a video # Explore presentation and survey to provide comment. Visit bit.ly/3d2ZsVFThen, then click'Current-Immokalee Road Corridor Study' Q Notifications 0 Messages Q Bookmarks O Lists °o Profile 6 More t-1 1 C) 2 T More Tweets ®Fort Myers Mighty Mussels @MightyMussels - 6h ••• ICYMI, the Mussels won AGAIN last night - taking down the Palm Beach Cardinals 7-4 in 8 innings. In the month of June, our guys have the BEST record (15-4) and the BEST ERA (2.10) in all of @MiLB #MusselUp 6 i 2_1 5 C% 31 u All FGCU Men's Hoops* @FGCU_MBB • 7h ICYMI: We're pretty excited about the crew coming in next season! RENEW Season Tickets: bit.ly/2LiagJd #WingsUp 1. ?fo I #DunkCity MATT HALUDR E SIGNED[ CYML Take a look at the incoming class for @FGCU_MBB i 00fgcuathletics.com Q 2I 9 C% 22 u Colleen Ross Friends of the Everglades @FoEverglades 7h ••• @Colleen689902 Happening now: After a 7-month hiatus, the Blue -Green Algae Task Force created by @GovRonDeSantis finally reconvenes in West Palm Beach, where https://twifter.com/CollierPIO/status/1 374784343936172034 Relevant people CollierPlO Follow + � @CollierPIO Official Twitter of Collier County Government. Download free Collier 331 app and call us at 311 or 239-252- 8999. What's happening US national news - 59 minutes ago Antivirus software creator John McAfee found dead in Spanish prison cell, authorities say Trending with RIP John McAfee #AppleOriginals Tap to discover more © Promoted by Apple TV Politics - Trending Ron DeSantis 48.8K Tweets Politics - Trending Ivanka 29.4K Tweets COVID-19 . LIVE COVID-19: News and updates for FL Florida Show more Terms of Service Privacy Policy Cookie Policy Ads info More ••• (P 2021 Twitter, Inc. 1/4 6/23/2021 Q Home # Explore CollierPlO on Twitter: "Visit the Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study (from Livingston Rd to Logan Blvd) virtual public meeting for cyanobacteria contaminated drinking water in May. 300 people have registered to attend online and in person. Q Search Twitter 6 Kimberly Miller* @KMillerWeather 7h Florida Blue -Green Algae Task Force about to start their meeting in West Relevant people Palm Beach. Register to watch via web here: protectingfloridatogether.gov/state-action/b... �: CollierPIO Q Notifications 0 Messages Q Bookmarks O Lists °o Profile 6 More J Q 2 t-71 7 d 16 u Joe Murray @JoeyMurr 8h Greatest 25 year run still going * 90s WWE @90sWWE - 9h 25 years ago today, Stone Cold won the King of the Ring and 'Austin 3:16' was born V •! Q d it u ®VISIT FLORIDA* @VISITFLORIDA - 2h ••• Always got that sunshine on your mind, huh? :#: Click for a little adventure inspiration: bit.ly/32eFy5C #LoveFL a M L c WORD -i T MW tFya ,y i�.c ....... ... :.... .... far �A.. F "-.RFECT FLORIDA ITINERA _ (i t.-I 3 C% 10 u t- Visit Bradenton Gulf Islands @VisitBradenton - 3h ••• . JF- �e �'7�� #Sealife #LoveFL #VisitFlorida FlVISIT FLORIDA* @VISITFLORIDA • Jun 21 any names, one Florida favorite. #LoveFL #ManateeMonday @CollierPIO Follow Official Twitter of Collier County Government. Download free Collier 331 app and call us at 311 or 239-252- 8999. What's happening US national news - 59 minutes ago Antivirus software creator John McAfee found dead in Spanish prison cell, authorities say Trending with RIP John McAfee #AppleOriginals Tap to discover more © Promoted by Apple TV Politics - Trending ... Ron DeSantis 48.8K Tweets Politics - Trending ... Ivanka 29.4K Tweets COVID-19 . LIVE COVID-19: News and updates for FL Florida Show more Terms of Service Privacy Policy Cookie Policy Ads info More ••• © 2021 Twitter, Inc. Colleen Ross @Col Ieen689902 https://twitter.com/CollierPIO/status/1374784343936172034 2/4 6/23/2021 CollierPlO on Twitter: "Visit the Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study (from Livingston Rd to Logan Blvd) virtual public meeting for MERMAID PC] ATO Q Search Twitter Q Home # Explore Q Notifications 0 Messages Q Bookmarks O Lists o Profile Q More INColleen Ross @Col Ieen689902 Q 1 t-1 1 d 8 u Derek Kopp* @DerekKoppTV 3h In the day & age of the transfer portal @FGCU_MBB and Coach Fly have done a greatjob filling needs. Fans at Alico Arena are going to get a men's and women's teams that are ready to compete for ASUN titles. 0 FGCU Men's Hoops* @FGCU_MBB 7h ICYMI: We're pretty excited about the crew coming in next season! RENEW Season Tickets: bit.ly/2LiagJd #WingsUp 0 1 #DunkCity Q t7 2 8 u Relevant people CollierPIO Follow @CollierPIO Official Twitter of Collier County Government. Download free Collier 331 app and call us at 311 or 239-252- 8999. What's happening US national news - 59 minutes ago Antivirus software creator John McAfee found dead in Spanish prison cell, authorities say Trending with RIP John McAfee #AppleOriginals Tap to discover more © Promoted by Apple TV Politics - Trending ... Ron Desantis 48.8K Tweets Politics - Trending ... Ivanka 29.4K Tweets COVID-19 . LIVE COVID-19: News and updates for FL Florida Show more Terms of Service Privacy Policy Cookie Policy Ads info More ••• © 2021 Twitter, Inc. https://twitter.com/CollierPIO/status/1 374784343936172034 3/4 6/23/2021 CollierPlO on Twitter: "Visit the Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study (from Livingston Rd to Logan Blvd) virtual public meeting for if Q Search Twitter Q Home # Explore Q Notifications 0 Messages Q Bookmarks O Lists o Profile Q More Relevant people CollierPIO Follow @CollierPIO Official Twitter of Collier County Government. Download free Collier 331 app and call us at 311 or 239-252- 8999. What's happening US national news - 59 minutes ago Antivirus software creator John McAfee found dead in Spanish prison cell, authorities say Trending with RIP John McAfee #AppleOriginals Tap to discover more © Promoted by Apple TV Politics - Trending Ron DeSantis 48.81K Tweets Politics - Trending Ivanka 29.41K Tweets COVID-19 . LIVE COVID-19: News and updates for FL Florida Show more Terms of Service Privacy Policy Cookie Policy Ads info More ••• © 2021 Twitter, Inc. Colleen Ross @Col Ieen689902 https://twitter.com/CollierPIO/status/1 374784343936172034 4/4 rifflPlIvAl News Feed — Nextdoor rncvtr1nnr (/news feed/) * Home(/news_feed/) 8o Deer... Uneighborhood_feed/) Q MapVmaP/) (https:Hnextdoorvaccinemap.com/) Q DigestVdigest?s=settings) Q Search Nextdoor Neighborhood 0 Hal... Vhelp map/?is=nav_bar) EVrecom mendations?is=nav_bar) Vfor_sale_and_free/?i nit_source=mc IE Local D... Voffers?is=nav_bar) 12 Public Agen...Vagency/feed/) M EventsVevents/) L9 Real... (/real-estate?is=sidebar) SafetyVcrime_and_safety/) Lost & Fo... Vlost and_found) Q DocumentsVdocuments/) 3 GeneralVgeneral/) Groups All... (/groups/?is=nav_menu) Topics tr All... (/channels/?is=nav_menu) Directories $ NeighborsVdirectory/) PetsVpet_directory) Help Vhelp/) - Guidelines Vneig h borhood_guidelines/#guidelines) Legal (https://help.nextdoor.com/s/legal) Privacy Vprivacy_policy/) About Vabout_us/) - Jobs Vjobs/) - Press (/press/) - Blog (https://blog.nextdoor.com) © 2021 Nextdoor Post a message, event, poll or alert to your neighborhood $Collier County Government(/agency-detail/fl/collier/collier-county-gove ••• Social Media Coordinator Collier County Florida Vprofile/50282776/) • 24 Mar Vp/ view=detail) Immokalee Road Congestion Corridor Study. Vp/25byrS5dSLDM?view=detail)The Collier County Transportation Planning Section is conducting the Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study to evaluate concepts for intersection improvements along Immokalee Road. The study limits are from Livingston Road to Logan See more... (https://flask.us.nextdoor.com/ct/nM41 f3 EyVw97KkyAB7KpI0oceJ 54 >_ga=2.261256013.1359009826.1625767847-348136202.162576784E Posted to Subscribers of Collier County Government �> Share GV 0 20 v More posts from your neighbors Welcome back "' Here's how to get around in the neighborhood. Sync contacts & see who you Confirm your phone number 483 groups it know Sync contacts Verify phone number Explor 2 of 6 steps completed �2 inbox/)00 a (/groups/?is=rhr) Deerwood has 487 groups From photography to parenting and more, check out what's happening in your neighborhood. View groups Posts from Nextdoor What's your preferred summer thermostat setting? If you have central air ... Vp/Yg BfL6m LbXrk) COVID-19 infections Wtrending in wrong directio... From Orlando Weekly: "Aft... Vp/RnX3Nb_PRHJP) Show off your July 4th celebration Going to a parade, block ... Vp/SFKzP9hygP4C) Sponsored unlock Unlock pea( Learn more https://nextdoor.com/p/25byrS5dSLDM 1 /7 7/8/2021 May 27 • Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study Virtual Public Meeting Question & Answer Session — Nextdoor May 27 - Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study Virtual Public Meeting Question & Answer Session — YnextaavI V) Sign in (/login/?next=%2Fevents%2F3971008%2F&is_logged_out=true) Find local events on Nextdoor, the neighborhood hub. Sign up for Nextdoor Florida (/find-neighborhood/fl/) / Naples (/city/naples--fl/) / Naples Events (/events/calendar/fl/naples) / Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study Virtual Public Meeting Question & Answer Session MAY 27 Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study Virtual Public Meeting Question & Answer Session Thu, May 27, 6:00 PM - 8:00 PM Going? Event details 1 Going Collier County Transportation Planning Department has conducted a study on Immokalee Road Corridor Traffic Congestion, study that's proposing among others an Overpass on Livingston Rd over Immokalee Rd, similar with the one on Golden Gate Pkwy and Airport Pulling Rd N, located in south Naples. This project will have an immediate and major impact on all surrounding communities, both during and after the lengthy construction process, estimated to take place between 2026 and 2030, due to increased traffic and traffic delays, higher noise levels and pollution, safety reasons, impacted property values, diminished appeal, etc. If this proposal is of any concern to you, you should summit your questions and concerns to Collier County not later than Friday, May 21 st, 2021 and register for the event that will https://nextdoor.com/events/3971008/ 1 /3 7/8/2021 May 27 • Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study Virtual Public Meeting Question & Answer Session — Nextdoor take place on Thursday, May 27th, 2021 at 6:00pm, please see the links on the invite. nextooeviythis is the first and last public debate on this proposal, prior to the County 0 Commissioners Board Meeting, scheduled for this coming June, when this proposal will be submitted for approval. Sign in (/login/?next=%2Fevents%2F3971008%2F&is_logged_out=true) Nextdoor About (/about_us/) News (/press/) Media Assets (https:Habout.nextdoor.com/us- media/) Investor Relations(https:Hinvestors.nextdoor.com/) Blog (https:Hblog.nextdoor.com/) Careers (/jobs/) Help (/help/) Agencies Public Agencies (/agency/) Public Agencies Blog (https:Hmedium.com/nextdooragencyresources/) Nonprofits Sell for Good (https:Hgo.us.nextdoor.com/nonprofits) Neighbors Get Started (/choose_address/) Events (/events/calendar/) Neighborhoods (/find -neighborhood/) Guidelines (/neighborhood_guidelines/#guidelines) Anti -Racism Resources (https:Habout.nextdoor.com/antiracism/) Business Local Business (https://business.nextdoor.com/local) Enterprise (https://business.nextdoor.com/enterprise) Real Estate (https://business.nextdoor.com/local/real-estate/) Local Business Blog (https://business.nextdoor.com/local/resources/) Paid Marketing Terms Vpaid_marketing_terms_of_service/) Self -Service Ad Terms (/self -service -advertising - terms -of -service/) Privacy (/privacy_policy/) Legal & Terms (https:Hhelp.nextdoor.com/s/legal) Cookies (/cookie_policy/) Get the app: (https:Hitunes.apple.com/us/app/nextdoor/id640360962?ls=1 &mt=8) (https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.nextdoor) Made by your neighbors in San Francisco, CA. © Nextdoor 2021. https://nextdoor.com/events/3971008/ 2/3 7/8/2021 May 27 • Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study Virtual Public Meeting Question & Answer Session — Nextdoor nextdoor V) Sign in (/login/?next=%2Fevents%2F3971008%2Ms_logged_out=true) https://nextdoor.com/events/3971008/ 3/3 Subscribe Past Issues Translate - RSS District 4 Newsletter April 21, 2021 Keeping Collier County Clean At our last Board of Collier County Commissioners meeting on April 13th, under public comments Nadia Barsamian expressed her concern for improperly discarded masks and the litter created by this carelessness. The Smithsonian Magazine shares those concerns, and has published a story on how wildlife throughout the globe, are being harmed by improperly discarded "single - use II PPE items - masks and plastic gloves (https://www.smithsonianma-). So what are we doing here, in Collier? We reached out to Dr. George Yilmaz, Department Head of Public Utilities who assured our office that Collier County is continuing their high standard of litter removal. Director of Solid & Hazardous Waste Management Kari Hodgson sent our office the following outlining the schedule for Collier County Solid Waste to keep Collier County beautiful: Collier County Beaches . Raked daily early morning, Monday though Friday (Vanderbilt Beach & Marco Island) Pelican Bay is private and the City of Naples is below. Collier County Trash Subscribe Past Issues Translate - RSS County Clean up Events . Quarterly cleanup events parks and beaches with partners, such as Friends of Tigertail. Collier County Neighborhood Cleanups May ist in Immokalee with 2 more tentatively scheduled for in May in the Bayshore Area and Goodland Island. Collier County Drop-off Event . Earth Day, April 22na -residents can drop off materials at the GoodWill Parking lot (Tamiami Trail East) . Twice a year "Round Up" events are hosted by Collier County Solid Waste Division are coordinated to allow residents to drop off household materials at any of the County's Recycling Centers. . There are 4 major recycling centers. Here is a link to the webpage with addresses: https://www.colliercountyfl.g�your-government/divisions-s-z/recycling= drop -off -centers For more information on Solid and Hazardous Waste Events please visit https://www.colliercountyfl.g�your-government/divisions-s-z/solid- hazardous -waste - management/solid -waste - department- events For more information from the Solid & Hazardous Waste website, please visit https://www.colliercountyfl.g�your-government/divisions-s-z/solid- hazardous -waste - management Subscribe Past Issues Translate - RSS -.Y ------r ___ Parks and Beaches Trash Pick Up . Trash is picked up in the parks once or twice a day or multiple times if there is a special event, seven days a week. . Beach - a cart goes and up and down the beach icking up trash seven days a week (some items found are coolers, tents, etc.f . Beach ends & beach parking lots- Trash is emptied and litter handled at least three times a day and on the weekends four -five times a day. Beach Raking . On the first business day of the month, the city of Naples rakes the entire beach from Gordon's Pass to Clam Pass (81/2 miles) and it is done once a month and this is a two week process. The reason for this monthly raking is for the mechanical removal of litter such as bottle caps, debris, etc. . Then the beach is raked as needed after the monthly raking if there are any environmental concerns. Of course, it really is up to all of us - the beach walker, the pedestrian, the shopper as well as Collier County Solid Waste to keep Collier clean, especially in this COVID-time. Working together, we will make the difference. Too Much Traffic on Immokalee Road? Transportation Planning has developed video approximately 30 minutes long regarding nine intersection on immokalee road and how they can be improved. The Study corridor on Immokalee Rd. is from Livingston Rd. to Logan Blvd. The video can be viewed at the following link: https://www.colliercountyfl.gov/planningstudies (under "Current — Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study"). Intersections Studied Nine intersections are being studied along the corridor (labeled "A" through "I"). Please reference the project aerial with highlighted squares for the location of each Subscribe Past Issues Translate - RSS . A: Livingston Rd. — Convert to a Single Point Urban Interchange (SPUI) commonly known as an Overpass. The recommendation is to bridge Livingston Road over Immokalee Road. The brid e is proposed as 4 lanes (2 lanes in each direction). An additional southboundleft turn at Livingston Road is also proposed. Through traffic along Livingston Road would not be required to stop, improving the traffic operations at this intersection. This is similar to the intersection at Golden Gate Parkway and Airport Road, where Golden Gate Parkway goes over Airport Road. . B: Juliet Blvd./Strand Blvd. — Widen the bridge along the southbound side of intersection, add turn lanes and increase the length of the left turn lanes. . C and D: I-7.5 Interchange (Southbound and Northbound On/Off Ramps I-75) — Convert to a Diverging Diamond Interchange (DDI). For this recommendation traffic patterns will only change along Immokalee Road; there will be no chan e to the traffic pattern on I-75. Traffic on Immokalee Road will shift (or diverge) to the opposite side of the road as it passes under I-75 and will be controlled by a traffic signal. A DDI configuration is unusual in that it requires traffic to briefly drive on the opposite side of the road (in this case while under I-75). Large overhead signs, barriers and/or pavement markings will be used to direct traffic. DDIs are becoming more popular in Florida, as they are an innovative solution to reduce delay and increase mobility and safety. There is a fully operational DDI at I-75 and University Parkway in Sarasota. FDOT is currently constructing a DDI at I-75 and Colonial Boulevard in Fort Myers. . E: Northbrooke Dr./Tarpon Bay Blvd. — Widen the bridge along the southbound side of intersection, add turn lanes and increase the length of the left turn lanes. . F: Oakes Blvd. — Restripe existing lanes to add through/right turn lane and increase the length of the left turn lanes. . G: Valewood Dr. — Restripe existing lanes to add through/right turn lane and dedicated right turn lane. . H: Executive Dr. — Restripe existing lanes to add through/right turn lane. . I: Logan Blvd. — Reconstruct the intersection to include a Partial Displaced Left Turn (PDLT) also known as a Continuous Flow Intersection (CFI) along Immokalee Road. The PDLT reconfigures the roadway by allowing vehicles to cross to the left side of the roadway before the intersection, which allows for multiple traffic movements that are not possible at conventional signalized intersections. This improvement will increase signal efficiency by allowing for longer green times at each leg of the intersection. Remember please view the following video: Immokalee Congestion Study Video The video is approximately 30 minutes long. The study is expected to be completed in the late Spring of 2021. Subscribe Past Issues Translate - RSS ViV V\. �R iVl 1 bL�.111bY 1�16{iil b\.11{.Lil\r �. May 14 — May 17, 2021 The Marco Island Branch Library located at 210 S. Heathwood Drive, Marco Island, Florida, will be closed on Friday, May 14, 2021, for facility maintenance and is expected to reopen for business on Tuesday, May 18, from 10:00 a.m. - 5:00 p.m. Library patrons can visit the South Regional Library located at 8o65 Lely Cultural Pkwy., Naples, Florida for library services. The South Regional Library is open from 1o:oo a.m. — 6:oo p.m. on Monday, Tuesday and Wednesday; and from lo:oo a.m. — 4:00 p.m. on Thursday, Friday and Saturday. For more information, please call (239) 252-7o64. Marco Island Executive Airport New Terminal Ribbon Cutting Ceremony April 28, 2021 11 a.m. The airport is located at 2005 Mainsail Drive Naples, Florida 34114. (A location diagram is at the end of this news release.) All are welcome to attend. County Manager Leo Ochs will serve as the Master of Ceremonies Speakers include: • Commission Chairman Penny Taylor, District 4 • Commissioner Rick LoCastro, District 1 • Former Commissioner Donna Fiala, District 1 • Growth Management Department Head Thaddeus Cohen • Marco City Council Chairman Jared Grifoni • Airport Authority Executive Manager Andrew Bennett • Former Airport Authority Executive Manager Justin Lobb • Lely High School Band will perform • Lely High School junior Reserve Officers Training Corps (JROTC) Color Guard will lead the Pledge of Allegiance 6/28/2021 District Three Town Hall - March 25, 2021 r Search Search Watch (/CablecastPublicSite/watch/l?channel=l) District Three Town Hall - March 25, 2021 Lla SHOW DETAILS UPCOMING AIR TIMES There are currently no upcoming air times. Collier Television - Bringing Government Home Collier Television is a service provided by the Collier County Board of County Commissioners Contact Us Call Us: 239-252-3853 (tel:239-252-3853) tv.colliergov.net/CablecastPublicSite/show/1118?channel=1 1 /2 6/28/2021 District Three Town Hall - March 25, 2021 Email Us: ctv@colliercountyfl.gov(mailto:cty@colliercountyfl.gov) Connect With Us 13 (http://www.twitter.com/@ColIierPIO) In(http://www.facebook.com//CollierGov) tv.colliergov.net/CablecastPublicSite/show/1118?channel=1 2/2 Meeting Summary This is a meeting summary of the Coffee with a Commissioner Andy Solis, District 2 meeting held Tuesday, July 20, 2021, 9:00 AM, Collier County Library, 2385 Orange Blossom Drive, Naples, FL 34109. Lorraine Lantz, Carmen Monroy (Stantec) and Bill Gramer (Jacobs Engineering) attended. Meeting Notes • Commissioner Solis started the presentation promptly at 9:30 AM. The meeting started with a welcome, format overview. It was noted speakers included Lorraine Lantz. • Lorraine Lantz gave a presentation on the Immokalee Road Corridor Study. The presentation discussed the project need (slide 2), project recommendations (slide 3), proposed intersection improvements (slide 4), and provided contact and project information (slide 5). Slides attached. • Commissioner Solis continued, using a power point presentation to highlight topics of interest. o Vanderbilt Beach Road — project timeline reviewed, discussion on landscaping o Veterans Memorial Blvd Extension — project timeline reviewed, discussion of high school opening and needed improvements o US Army Corps of Engineers Coast Storm Risk Management Study — provided overview and timeline. Discussion of grants, process for development of mitigation projects. o Tourism Update — discussed over all impact of 2020 and the pandemic on tourism and visitors to Collier County. Discussed 2019 as a basis year. Reported 2021 totals to date. Indicated overall increase in visitation from US, overall tourism up +4.8% o Palm River PUR — discussed replacement of clay pipes and other needed repairs. o High Rise Safety Issues — noted ongoing maintenance of buildings critical. Urged attendees to engage with HOAs to make sure inspections are undertaken and maintenance is prioritized. o Mental Health Facility — discussed construction timeline, cost effectiveness of program. Discussed Data Collaborative — one of only a few counties which will have data on program, allowing for data - driven decision making. Questions & Answer Q1 Participant asked about funding the operational costs associated with the Mental Health Facility. Commissioner provided information regarding plans for the Mental Health facility. Q2 Participant asked if any consideration had been given to an interchange off 1-75 at Vanderbilt before considering an overpass? Commissioner noted FDOT is conducting studies to determine need. He noted regardless of the interchange request, improvements along Immokalee Road were still needed. Lorraine Lantz noted FDOT coordination is ongoing. Q3 Participant thanked Commissioner Solis on the communication regarding the vaccine contained in the newsletter. Commissioner spoke about the use of Collier 311. Q4 There was a question regarding storm water management and the use of the Cocohatchee Canal specifically when will it be dredged? Commissioner spoke about ongoing work and coordination with SFWMD. Page 1 1 Q5 Participant noted Collier County will be redistricting and asked for an update. Commissioner spoke on the redistricting plans approved at the June BOCC meeting. Q6 Participant asked about the role of planned growth. Commissioner affirmed Collier County continues to work towards planned growth. Q7 Participant asked about future plans for affordable housing in Collier County. The participant added, she thought landscaping was too tall in some medians. Commissioner agreed on the need for affordable housing in Collier County and spoke to recent efforts to address this. Commissioner spoke of median landscaping costs, efforts to use native plantings and appropriately sized plantings. Q8 Participant followed up on the prior statement on affordable housing, indicating support for inclusionary zoning. Commissioner agreed. At approximately 10:30 AM, the question -and -answer period of the meeting ended. Commissioner Solis thanked participants for attending and stated that he would be willing to attend HOA or Neighborhood Meetings if anyone requested his attendance. Collier County Staff took additional questions. • Debbie Littman, President of the Carlton Lakes Master Association addressed Lorraine Lantz. She was provided maps of the proposed overpass. She inquired about the timetable for design. She noted that after the HOA virtual presentation there has been a better understanding of the project and felt there may be less opposition. Lorraine Lantz thanked Ms. Littman for attending. She provided of maps showing the project. Lorraine offered to provide any additional information needed, or attend meetings as requested. • Another resident of Carlton Lakes requested a copy of the map but did not provide his name. He thanked Lorraine Lantz for the presentation. Lorraine Lantz thanked the resident for attending and provided a copy of the project map showing the overpass. Lorraine offered to provide any additional project information needed. • Ernie Verrice inquired about the intersection at Orange Blossom and Airport and any planned improvements. He noted the landscaping company operating at the corner often blocks traffic, impeding free flow off Airport. He stated he had made similar comments to the Collier County during a NIM for Siena Lakes. Mr. Verrice was joined by Anthony Matoni. Mr. Matoni is a BPAC member. He stated conflicts at the intersection and that he has previously brought this up to the Collier MPO and BPAC. Lorraine Lantz thanked Mr. Verrice and Mr. Matoni and noted the intersection. Lorraine offered to refer the information to the appropriate staff for follow up. Lorraine Lantz thanked Commissioner Solis and Angela Goodner for the opportunity to present the Immokalee Rd. Corridor Study and stated that the team would be willing to provide additional project information, if requested, for a neighborhood meeting. Page 1 2 AL _ r �F `- r' Fr ; •-� r Immokalee• Corridor Stud r rT^ , Coffee with Commissioner Solis r PC mly zo, xgzl Presenter. Lora a LanPrincipal Pla T C•Inlier wCaMital Proje Plan ing,I , Fe &Program anagement t- Immokalee Road Corridor Livingston Road to Logan Boulevard - 9 intersections Characteristics Considerations • Nigh C—h [orddor • Collier Cgunry eepeded • EvaNatlon R,I RaCliatian graveth ♦"% • -Ight Dhrrlb—, c—Lm • -H. Volume ..reef. Oerignation eepeded to gmw by .67% •Mufti -medal user • Lavel M Service peerease5 • Cenatreined [snider • hrvel Tjme Rellebilhy - One ei g Cannediens In I-]S �� Recommendations l Planned Improvements �4 �•�•� A • No -Build option Minor Improvements • eptimiae sq-ll timing -... • Rmriping Wne &Shwlder Repulp_, 1 Major Innovative i', ,•��'� Improvements •Overpass atlmmokalee-Livingston F•opoua wmbaanon •1-751nterchange mp—ments ,hoege lnaArnn�le�� • Paitial Displaced Len rum ICondnuous Flow lnLerchange)ellmmokalee-Cagan ;- O 1�� `- .�"_ ... . � -- ��• yam. • Immokalee Road . (B) Juliet Blvd/Strand Blvd Conventional Intersection Improvements • (E) Northbrooke DrAirpon Bay Blvd • (F) Oakes Blvd • add turn I— • (G) Y➢ICW'4.Qd Dr • Wdlnmoatr — • (H) Executive Dr Project and Contact Information Lorraine Lan Lz Principal Planner [grw swag eaotal woRgeF. FaWmgp lanpe[I iges &mgram aNm6pnr.nl LortalnianiilruumvRod ra uasl xst 5775 slrs Project Website htte;(ICallie,tQyr�[yF�,p4vloLvaninas W dies From: LantzLorraine Subject: [EXTERNAL] Immokalee Rd. Corridor Congestion Study HOA Meeting Date: Friday, May 14, 2021 5:14:34 PM Attachments: imaoeWlmno HOA Meeting Advertisement.odf We are sending you this meeting invitation because of your potential interest in the Immokalee Rd. Corridor Congestion Study and specifically the intersection at Immokalee Rd. and Livingston Rd. Please feel free to forward this invitation to anyone who may be interested in the Immokalee/Livingston intersection. Those interested, must register at the link below to attend the event. You're Invited! Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study Virtual Public Information Meeting Question & Answer Session Date and Time: Thursday, May 27, 2021 at 6:00 p.m. (Eastern Daylight Savings Time) About this event Collier County Transportation Planning is conducting the Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study along Immokalee Road, from Livingston Road to Logan Boulevard, and is hosting a Virtual Public Information Meeting Question and Answer (Q&A) Session. The meeting will provide an overview of the study but will be focused on the proposed improvements at the Livingston Road and Immokalee Road intersection. Your questions and concerns are important to us. The virtual public meeting will begin with a brief overview of the study, and then the Study Team including Collier County staff and representatives will be available to answer as many of your questions as possible. Meeting attendees will be in "Listen -Only Mode" during the Q&A. While you will have an opportunity to submit comments and questions during the Q&A, we encourage you to submit your questions or comments in advance on the event registration page. Questions submitted both prior to and during the virtual meeting will be addressed as time allows. We ask that all comments and questions be submitted to Collier County no later than Friday, May 21, 2021 to be addressed during the presentation. Any questions received after May 21, 2021 or which cannot be answered during the Q&A due to time constraints will receive responses in writing at a later date. Register here: https://www.eventbrite.com/e/immokalee-road-corridor-congestion-study-virtual- public-information-meeting-registration-154470219585 • For additional information about the Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study select the following link o https://www.colliercountyfl.gov/planningstudies then select `Current - Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study' • A narrated presentation that explains the recommended improvements at each intersection is also available at the following link. Narrated Video Presentation: https://collier.granicus.com/player/clip/3004? view_id=4&redirect=true • Take the Project Survey: o https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/338CB6M We look forward to your comments, questions and participation at our Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study Virtual Public Information Meeting Q&A Session. This public meeting will be held virtually in accordance with recommendations from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Department of Health to avoid public gatherings when possible and to practice social distancing. Respectfully, Lorraine Lorraine M. Lantz, AICP Principal Planner Co 7er C014 'ity Collier County Capital Projects, Planning, Impact Fees & Program Management NOTE: Email Address Has Changed 2685 S. Horseshoe Drive, Suite #103 Naples, FL 34104 Phone: (239) 252-5779 Lorraine.Lantz@CollierCountyFL.aov Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. You're Invited! coftr county Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study Virtual Public Information Meeting Question & Answer Session Date and Time: Thursday, May 27, 2021 at 6:00 p.m. (Eastern Daylight Savings Time) About this event Collier County Transportation Planning is conducting the Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study along Immokalee Road, from Livingston Road to Logan Boulevard, and is hosting a Virtual Public Information Meeting Question and Answer (Q&A) Session. The meeting will provide an overview of the study but will be focused on the proposed improvements at the Livingston Road and Immokalee Road intersection. Your questions and concerns are important to us. The virtual public meeting will begin with a brief overview of the study, and then the Study Team including Collier County staff and representatives will be available to answer as many of your questions as possible. Meeting attendees will be in "Listen -Only Mode" during the Q&A. While you will have an opportunity to submit comments and questions during the Q&A, we encourage you to submit your questions or comments in advance on the event registration page. Questions submitted both prior to and during the virtual meeting will be addressed as time allows. We ask that all comments and questions be submitted to Collier County no later than Friday, May 21, 2021 to be addressed during the presentation. Any questions received after May 21, 2021 or which cannot be answered during the Q&A due to time constraints will receive responses in writing at a later date. Register here: https://www.eventbrite.com/e/immokalee-road-corridor-congestion-study-virtual- public-information-meeting-registration-154470219585 • For additional information about the Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study select the following link o https://www.colliercountvfl.qov/planningstudies then select `Current - Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study' • A narrated presentation that explains the recommended improvements at each intersection is also available at the following link. o Narrated Video Presentation: https://collier.granicus.com/player/clip/3004?view id=4&redirect=true • Take the Project Survey: o https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/338CB6M We look forward to your comments, questions and participation at our Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study Virtual Public Information Meeting Q&A Session. This public meeting will be held virtually in accordance with recommendations from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Department of Health to avoid public gatherings when possible and to practice social distancing. IN MOTION JULY 2021 SUMMER BREAK - WHAT IS THE MPO TEAM DOING? h ,A"A Summertime is the slow season for Collier MPO. Most committees are not meeting and on their own summer break. We spend the summer getting reorganized and prepared for the upcoming year. It's also a time for "spring" cleaning, albeit a bit later than usual. Summer is the time to complete invoices, organize old documents, clean up the website and prep new documents. Summer is also the perfect time for MPO staff members to take vacations! SUMMERTIME SAFETY Florida has the highest number of bicycle and pedestrian crashes and fatalities in the US. Keep these few simple rules in mind to keep everyone safe! i Adhere to all traffic laws. Walk against traffic when sidewalks are unavailable. SAFETYPedestrians and bicyclists should wear bright colors and/or carry a light. Watch FIRST for others whether they be cars, bicyclists, or pedestrians. Bicyclists wear a helmet and don't use headphones. Drivers don't text and drive. Pedestrians don't jaywalk. Find out more safety tips online. PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT ` The Collier MPO places a high value on public involvement. The MPO's public it 11 it involvement program is designed to ensure opportunities for the public to Ir II fl express their views on transportation and mobility issues and to become active • • participants in the transportation decision -making process. Ways to become involved are attending a meeting, sharing your opinions, joining the adviser network, and/or joining an advisory committee. UP NEXT! IN*The Bicycle/Pedestrian Advisory Committee will meet on August 17, followed by the Technical and Citizens Advisory Committees Meetings on August 30. The Local Coordinating Board will meet for their quarterly meeting on September 1. And finally the MPO Board Meetings will resume on September 10. INFORMATION - IMMOKALEE ROAD CORRIDOR CONGESTION STUDY Collier County is conducting the Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study along Immokalee Road from Livingston Road to Logan Boulevard. The study includes evaluating intersection concepts along the corridor to enhance traffic operations and safety concerns based on current and future travel demands. The purpose of the project is to identify and recommend potential improvements that would reduce congestion and improve the Level of Service (LOS) along the corridor. The current traffic volumes along the corridor are approaching capacity. Based on anticipated traffic growth, the corridor operations will experience severe delays by 2040 if no improvements are made. The roadway is critical in facilitating movement of local and regional traffic (including truck traffic) in northern Collier County and is one of three east -west connections to 1-75 in Collier County. The study as well as the recommendations are consistent with the Collier MPO 2045 LRTP which identified the Immokalee Road and Livingston Road and Logan Boulevard intersections and the 1-75 Interchange for construction in its Cost Feasible Plan. The study is expected to be completed in September of 2021. For any questions related to this project, please contact: Principal Planner - Lorraine Lantz, AICP at Lorraine.Lantz@colliercountyfl.gov or by phone at 239-252-5779. REMINDER Member governments please remember that the Bike-Ped Project Concept Sheets are due by Close of Business on July 20, 2021. Call Anne McLaughlin at 239-252-5884 with questions. Immokalee Corridor Study Mailing List First Name Last Name Home Owner Associations Phone Email Address City State Postal Property Email Blast Email Blast Email Code Management sent Email Blast - 7/2/21 Company 3/22/21 4/14/21 FDOT Project 5/11/21 Ryan Smart 1000 Friends of Florida 850-222-6277 friends@1000fof.org P.O. Box 5948 Tallahassee, FL FL 32314 X x x advanced property management info@apmsfl.com Advanced Property X X x x Management April Circle No email address aston gardens x Mark Trepanier 2395710734 MTrepanier@AstonGardens.com Aston Gardens 239-320-7828 No email address Eric Draper Audubon of Florida edraper@audubon.org 4500 Biscayne Blvd, suite 205 Miami FL 33137 Returned returned as Returned Undeliverable delivery undeliverabl Eileen Arsenault Audubon of the Western Everglades Dollfin85@comcast.net 1020 8th Avenue South, suite 2 Naples FL 34102 X x x Barron Collier High School — Principal Jon Bremseth No email address BremseJo@collierschools.com Lisa Sommers Biscayne Place HOA 239-596-7200 LisaS@sandcastlecm.com X X x x George Mazor Biscayne Place HOA 201-264-0805 theg5maz@aol.com X X x x Breezewood No email address Marty Sullivan Bridgewater Bay 239-592-1869 3070 Bridgewater Bay Blvd Naples FL 34109 X X x x mgrbwb@americanpms.net Bridgewater Bay Property Owners Associates Inc. 239-592-5111 bridgewaterbay@americanpms.net 3070 Bridgewater Bay Blvd Naples FL 34109 X X x x Carlton Lakes x Elizabeth McHugh 3392222198 2mchugh2@gmail.com Carlton Lakes x Shellie Specter 6seashell@gmail.com Carlton Lakes x Gwen Rasiwala 239-776-0008 adam.gwen.rasiwala@gmail.com Carlton Lakes x Adam Rasiwala 239-770-0942 adam@dsdhomes.net Carlton Lakes x Aggie Vitale 5166598793 agvit@aol.com Carlton Lakes andrea Backes carlton Lakes aib2874@gmail.com x x Carlton Lakes x Chris Aller allerc@bellsouth.net Ali m Carlton Lakes amack64@gmail.com x Carlton Lakes x Ann Marie McHugh 8605733190 ammchughfl@gmail.com Carlton Lakes x Ann Marie McHugh 8605733190 ammchughfl@gmail.com Carlton Lakes x AnnMarie McHugh ammchughfl@gmail.com Carlton Lakes x Angela Ciccia 9789878370 angelamciccia@gmail.com waverly green way Carlton Lakes x Anthony Maru 203-623-4224 anthony.maru@gmail.com Marius Stoia Carlton Lakes 646-808-5702 askmarius@gmail.com 5140 Cobble Creek Ct Naples FL 34109 x Marius Stoia Carlton Lakes 6468085702 askmarius@gmail.com Edgewater at Carlton Lakes x Immokalee Corridor Study Mailing List First Name Last Name Home Owner Associations Phone Email Address City State Postal Property Email Blast Email Blast Email Code Management sent Email Blast - 7/2/21 Company 3/22/21 4/14/21 FDOT Project 5/11/21 Marius Stoia carlton Lakes askmarius@gmail.com x x Carlton Lakes x Augustine Perillo 9084890678 augielizp@gmail.com Augustine Perillo carlton Lakes augielizp@gmail.com x x Carlton Lakes x Barbara Fuller 18044364646 bafuller1947@gmail.com Carlton Lakes x Danielle Cates 8044364646 bafuller1947@gmail.com Carlton Lakes x Beth Majors 3147911159 bethmajors@aol.com Cedar Springs Carlton Lakes x Beth Majors bethmajors@aol.com Carlton Lakes x Bruce Mehl 3096578464 bfinehl@yahoo.com Retired Carlton Lakes x Bill Boodger 2394048524 bill_boodger@msn.com Barbara bryer Carlton Lakes blbryer@hotmail.com x Carlton Lakes x Bernie Mraz bnmraz526@comcast.net Carlton Lakes x Robert Comeriato bobcnaples@gmail.com Carlton Lakes x Bob Pawlowski 586 615 7676 bobpaulap@sbcglobal.net Carlton Lakes x John McHugh 3392222198 bomcg06@gmail.com Carlton Lakes x John McHugh 3392222198 bomcg06@gmail.com No Brenda Chilstrom Carlton Lakes 2395957018 brendaot@gmail.com x Carlton Lakes x Charles/Anne Edwards 708 212 5611 cae303@aol.com Carlton Lakes x michael Campanelli 9142639956 cam panelIi.mike@verizon.net northboro Dr. Carlton Lakes x Carol Wood 2392932489 carolwfl@yahoo.com Carlton Lakes x Clare Cassara 15164591077 ccass821@aol.com lexington ct Carlton Lakes x Cheryl Chegwidden 2394518209 chegwidden3@gmail.com Cheryl White Carlton Lakes cheriewhitee@att.net Returned returned as x x undeliverabl Cheryl White carlton Lakes cheriewhitee@att.net x x Carlton Lakes x Cheryl Pfaus cherylhfl@yahoo.com Cedar Springs Carlton Lakes x Linda Mitchell 2396319928 chewylle@gmail.com Carlton Lakes x Peggy Holstine 2695792181 chocolatecow40@aol.com Northridge Dr. colleen patrick carlton Lakes colleenpatrickl7@gmail.com x x Kevin Dunn carlton Lakes colzav@hotmail.com x x Immokalee Corridor Study Mailing List First Name Last Name Home Owner Associations Phone Email Address City State Postal Property Email Blast Email Blast Email Code Management sent Email Blast - 7/2/21 Company 3/22/21 4/14/21 FDOT Project 5/11/21 Carlton Lakes x carole Noren 631-523-3275 contessa6462@gmail.com sherborn dr Carlton Lakes x Paul Raffa coolpau134110@gmail.com waverly green way Carlton Lakes x chris vitale 5164739139 cvita@slomins.com Carlton Lakes x Chris Vitale 5164739139 cvita@slomins.com Daniel Dunn carlton Lakes danieldunn@me.com x x Carlton Lakes x Dan Leaman 2394040254 dannao2@comcast.net None Carlton Lakes x Dave Dasher davedashe@gmail.com Cedar Springs Deborah Littman Carlton Lakes 614-619-0985 deb.lakeview@gmail.com Carlton Lakes Master Association x Carlton Lakes x Debby Stephens 2394048524 destephens2@gmail.com Carlton Lakes x Mary Rossi 3392212504 dmrossil@aol.com Northridge Dr. Carlton Lakes x Linda Donaldson 2395955806 donaldsonlinda9l@gmail.com Carlton Lakes x Debi Wollenberg 8473028576 dunnfirst@yahoo.com Carlton Lakes x David Appleby Jr dwapplebyjr@gmail.com highwood park In Carlton Lakes x Eugene Nalli Emnll0@comcast.net Northridge Dr. Carlton Lakes x Ed Samuels 2395353362 ESAMUELS@ATT.NET Carlton Lakes x Gary Campbell garycampbell-cpa@msn.com Carlton Lakes x Donna Gentzel gentzel@comcast.net Michelle Andrade Carlton Lakes ginamichelle58@gmail.com x Gio Andrade Carlton Lakes gio.andrade007@gmail.com x Carlton Lakes x GEORGE NOREN 6313831928 gladiator172@yahoo.com Carlton Lakes Resident Carlton Lakes x Joseph Grande 4407599377 grandejoseph@yahoo.com waverly green way Greg Geddis carlton Lakes greggeddis2@gmail.com x x Geoff Lles Carlton Lakes ilesturner@gmail.com x Janice Elsesser Carlton Lakes 763-221-1244 j.g.elsesser@gmail.com Not Applicable x Jan Donnell Carlton Lakes 2392723234 jan.lakeview@gmail.com x James LaCroix Carlton Lakes 5862560444 jandwelectric@yahoo.com x Carlton Lakes x Joann Belmar jbelmar@charter.net Cypress Pointe Carlton Lakes x Jean Cahill 12014003647 jeancahi117@gmail.com Worthington Ln Immokalee Corridor Study Mailing List First Name Last Name Home Owner Associations Phone Email Address City State Postal Property Email Blast Email Blast Email Code Management sent Email Blast - 7/2/21 Company 3/22/21 4/14/21 FDOT Project 5/11/21 Carlton Lakes x Barbara Kornek jerseygirlbek@gmail.com Carlton Lakes x James Warner 17193513962 jfwarnerco@gmail.com highwood park In Carlton Lakes x Joyce Leedom 856-912-1720 jkleedom@comcast.net Carlton Lakes x JOHN PANAGIDES JPANAGIDES@YAHOO.COM Carlton Lakes x JOHN PANAGIDES JPANAGIDES@YAHOO.COM Carlton Lakes x Jean Paulsen 973-342-6093 jpincmac@aol.com Carlton Lakes x John Tivenan 646 247-3090 jrt7744@msn.com Carlton Lakes x Judith T 5089427650 jsabin244@gmail.com Carlton Lakes x James Shields 6315537630 jss4963@gmail.com Carlton Lakes x James Shields 6315537630 jss4963@gmail.com Carlton Lakes x Julie Chilstrom 6057690735 juliecdts@gmail.com highwood park In Kathleen Butera Carlton Lakes kathleenbutera@vahoo.com 5135 Cobble Creek ct Naples fl 34110 X x x Carlton Lakes x BOB DRISTE 16128240899 KDRISTE41@GMAIL.COM Carlton Lakes x Glenn Niesen ke4ktz@gmail.com Carlton Lakes x Kelly Stephens 2394048524 kellymstephens2@gmail.com Carlton Lakes x Bruce Kotila kotila@newnorth.net Carlton Lakes x Kristina Schotzinger 330-328-5428 kristina.carltonlakes@gmail.com Carlton Lakes x Larry Beer 3303217191 Iandlbeer@aol.com Carlton Lakes x larry beer Iandlbeer@aol.com Carlton Lakes x Lauren Grant Iaurenj123@aol.com Worthington Ln Carlton Lakes x Elizabeth Girardat Iirardat@gmail.com Northridge Dr. Carlton Lakes x Larry Griminger 3096572665 Igriminger6839@comcast.net Carlton Lakes x Larry Griminger 3096575750 Igriminger6839@comcast.net Northridge Dr. Lisa O'Toole carlton Lakes Iisatoolefl@gmail.com Returned Returned Undeliverable undeliverabl Carlton Lakes x Lora Boross Iorabhere2@aol.com Carlton Lakes x Lori Yorkavitz Iuvlori@zoominternet.net lexington ct Carlton Lakes x JANE LYTLE 6143021218 Iytledean@AOL.com CARLTON LAKES CLUBHOUSE Mario Cardamone Carlton Lakes +912397769930 markocommando@gmail.com x Immokalee Corridor Study Mailing List First Name Last Name Home Owner Associations Phone Email Address City State Postal Property Email Blast Email Blast Email Code Management sent Email Blast - 7/2/21 Company 3/22/21 4/14/21 FDOT Project 5/11/21 Carlton Lakes x Mary Zizzo 8473456995 maryzizzo@icloud.com Maureen Dunn carlton Lakes maureendunn5@gmail.com x x Carlton Lakes x Charlotte Mayne maynec@aol.com Carlton Lakes x Mark Chowanic mc472@sbcglobal.net Nicholas Mealey carlton Lakes mealey.nicholas@gmail.com x x Carlton Lakes x Nicholas Mealey mealey.nicholas@gmail.com Carlton Lakes x Mary Ellbeg mellbeg@aol.com Carlton Lakes Returned Undeliverable Martin Sullivan 2392480206 mrsully!@aol.com Martin Sullivan Carlton lakes Mrsullyl@aol.com X x x Carlton Lakes x Sharon Leonard 8144020304 munchsa@gmail.com Carlton Lakes x John Leonard 8144020304 munchsa@gmail.com Carlton Lakes x Jeff Braun 2676640419 ndpang55@gmail.com Carlton Lakes x Nancy Tarullo 9737227500 ndtlbi@gmail.com Carlton Lakes x Debra Niesen nratchet@onefryshort.org Carlton Lakes x Nan Roytberg 8476504913 nroytberg@gmail.com None - Carlton Lakes x anthony vitale 15166598793 nyssba96@aol.com owner Carlton Lakes x Sandra Campo 4014196438 oats058@outlook.com cobble creek - edgewater Carlton Lakes x Ofelia Tallon 2395658992 otallon@gmail.com Carlton Lakes Returned Undeliverable Lisa OToole otooleli58@gmail.com cobble creek - edgewater Carlton Lakes x oscar vazquez ovmail90@gmail.com Patricia Canfield Carlton Lakes pattycanf@gmail.com x Patricia Canfield Carlton Lakes pattycanf@gmail.com x Paula Pawlowski Carlton Lakes paulapaw@me.com 5360 #202 Andover Dr. Naples FL 34109 x x Carlton Lakes x Paul Dewe-Mathews 2395641122 pdewemathews@gmail.com Resident Carlton Lakes , Naples FI 34110 Perry Krieger Carlton Lakes 4168024488 perry@perrykrieger.com Perry Krieger & Associates Inc. x Carlton Lakes x Pamela Stracka ppstracka@gmail.com waverly green way Carlton Lakes x Jay Chesslo 6304765602 psujml@gmail.com highwood park In Carlton Lakes x peter trusevitch 12395939754 ptrusevitch@yahoo.com Immokalee Corridor Study Mailing List First Name Last Name Home Owner Associations Phone Email Address City State Postal Property Email Blast Email Blast Email Code Management sent Email Blast - 7/2/21 Company 3/22/21 4/14/21 FDOT Project 5/11/21 Carlton Lakes x Robert Strutzel 3122133466 r.strutzel@att.net Carlton Lakes Community Carlton Lakes x Rosemary Christie 8452698065 rcnaples58@gmail.com Carlton Lakes x Robin Crudele 2394316852 rcrudele@gmail.com Carlton Lakes x robert bree 6179051340 rdbree2002@yahoo.com Carlton Lakes x robert bree rdbree2002@yahoo.com Carlton Lakes x Diane Zunic reezunic@aol.com Carlton Lakes x Renate LaCroix 2488808218 renate.lacroix@uticaleaseco.com Carlton Lakes x Rosemary Foreman 915-920-0208 rforered@aol.com waverly green way Carlton Lakes x Rick Tessmer 239-682-3379 ricktessmer@hotmail.com Carlton Lakes x Richard Catania 12392163210 ricshaw1943@yahoo.com Carlton Lakes x ROBERT STRUTZEL 3122133466 robs5230@gmail.com Robert Strutzel carlton Lakes robs5230@gmail.com x x Carlton Lakes x Ron Delestowicz 7089322731 rondel5@yahoo.com Carlton Lakes x Rick Tierney 5152081471 rtier55@gmail.com Carlton Lakes Carlton Lakes x Carol Simpson 8476125694 sac101384@aol.com Carlton Lakes x Carol Simpson 8476125694 sac101384@aol.com Ashwood Lane Carlton Lakes x joyce saunders saunderj@bc.edu Cheryl Nunes Carlton Lakes secatropix@gmail.com X x x Carlton Lakes x Debra Adamski 2014361399 sheba2329@gmail.com Debbie adamski carlton Lakes sheba2329@gmail.com 5120 Cobble Creek Ct. #103 Naples FL x x Carlton Lakes x Sheila Peterson 6122511641 sheila.white1956@yahoo.com Carlton Lakes Carlton Lakes x Virginia Burkley 9084205495 sheri164@comcast.net Stephen Gordon carlton Lakes 805-390-6366 SIGordo@msn.com 5115 Cobble Creek Ct #203 x x Carlton Lakes x Stephen Gordon 8053906366 sigordo@msn.com Edgewater HOA Carlton Lakes x Rae Smith-Higbie 6142716142 smithhigbie@gmail.com Cedar Springs Carlton Lakes x Sidney Staples 239 404-2861 stapless9l@yahoo.com Carlton Lakes x Steve Kulaga 12394316043 stevekulaga@mac.com Carlton Lakes x Steven Kulaga I istevekulaga@mac.com Immokalee Corridor Study Mailing List First Name Last Name Home Owner Associations Phone Email Address City State Postal Code Property Management Company Email sent 3/22/21 Blast Email 4/14/21 Email Blast - FDOT Project 5/11/21 Blast Email 7/2/21 Susan Gordon carlton Lakes suegart04@mac.com x x Kevin Dunn carlton Lakes supkdunn@gmail.com x x Susan Mulgrew Carlton Lakes swm1982@aol.com x Tony Ciros Carlton Lakes tciros@comcast.net Returned undeliverable thomas bryer Carlton Lakes 7178565744 tebryer@yahoo.com Retired x Tom bryer Carlton Lakes tebryer@yahoo.com x Robert Epstein Carlton Lakes technomed@yahoo.com x thomas wonsiewicz Carlton Lakes tlwons@me.com x Tom Dur Carlton Lakes tsdurhaml9@gmail.com Deerfield Way x Tim Foley Carlton Lakes 5165813772 undtpfl4@gmail.com x Victor Atsinger Carlton Lakes 4076948853 vatsinger@gmail.com birmingham dr x Vincent Baiera Carlton Lakes 9176171107 vbsiera5655@gmail.com Returned Undeliverable William Chandley Carlton Lakes 4124009055 wo@chandley.net Retired x Dawn Miller Carlton Lakes 2392094300 xxoojessie@yahoo.com Northridge Dr. sellstate Prime x Yvonne Blair Carlton Lakes ysblair@gmail.com Northridge Dr. x Zach Franklin Carlton Lakes zachl3franklin@gmail.com x Carlton Lakes Master Assoc. alex.bauatach@gmail.com Returned X Returned undeliverabl Undeliverable Carlton Lakes Master Assoc. bakamphfer@hotmail.com Returned X Returned undeliverabl Undeliverable Carlton Lakes Master Assoc. brusara@aol.com X X x x Deborah Littman Carlton Lakes Master Assoc. 239-593-5309 deb.lakeview@gmail.com X X x x Carlton Lakes Master Assoc. 239-653-9942 dwapplebyir@gmail.com X X x x Carlton Lakes Master Assoc. kristina.carltonlakes@gmail.com X X x x Carlton Lakes Master Assoc. ptrusevitch@yahoo.com X X x x Izzy Ludwick Carlton Lakes Property Manager izzy.ludwick@gulfbreezemanageme X X x x nt.com Tom Eastman CCPS EastmanTh@collierschools.com X X x x Lt. Thomas Orr CCSO - District 1 239-252-9100 thomas.orr@colliersheriff.org X X x x Lt. Neal Bohannon CCSO - District 2 239-455-3121 Heal.bohannon@colliersheriff.org X X x x Cedar Montessori School office@cedarmontessori.org X X x x Immokalee Corridor Study Mailing List First Name Last Name Home Owner Associations Phone Email Address City State Postal Code Property Management Company Email sent 3/22/21 Blast Email 4/14/21 Email Blast - FDOT Project 5/11/21 Blast Email 7/2/21 Childrens Montessori School childmont101@gmail.com X X x x Cleary RPUD No email address Karen De Stefano Clubside at Pelican Strand 3127351885 karendestefano312@gmail.com three iron dr x Anne McLaughlin Collier MPO Anne. Mclaughlin@colIiercountyfLgo X x x v Brandy Cterro Collier MPO bra ndy.otero@colliercountyfLgov X x x Rob Moher Conservancy of Southwest Florida 239-403-4210 robm@conservancy.org 1495 Smith Preserve Way Naples FL 34102 X x x Kevin Rambosk County Sheriff Collier County sheriff@colIiersheriff.net Returned X Returned undeliverabl undeliverable April Staples Cypress Cove at Pelican Strand 2395953484 aprilstaples@yahoo.com Whisperwood Blvd x Cheryl Childress Cypress Cove at Pelican Strand cheric855@aol.com Whisperwood Blvd x Ronald Childress Cypress Cove at Pelican Strand cheric855@aol.com Whisperwood Blvd x Cypress Woods Golf and Country Club 239-593-3392 office@cypresswoodsgolf.com 3525 Northbrooke Dr Naples FL 34119 X X x x Paul Busch Cypress Woods Golf and Country Club 248-877-4277 Pdbusch9164@yahoo.com 2870 Cypress Trace Cir x Dean Blaser Da Vinci Estates in Old Cypress d3blaser@gmail.com X X x x joe Manhart Da Vinci Estates in Old Cypress 0oemanhart@gmail.com X X x x Bruce Sickles Da Vinci Estates in Old Cypress 239-272-7158 kgpm@comcast.net X X x x Ben Prater Defenders of Wildlife 828-412-0980 southeastoffice@defenders.org 1 Rankin Avenue, 2nd floor Asheville NC 28801 X x x Laurie Ann Macdonald Defenders of Wildlife - Florida 727-823-3888 laurie.macdonald@defenders.org 3637 4th Street N, suite 230 St. Petersburg FL 33704 Returned returned as delivery Returned undeliverabl Undeliverable Brad Phelps Delasol HOA brad@anchormanagers.com X x x Kevin Frost Delasol HOA 239-592-5461 kevin@anchormanagers.com Anchor Associates - 2340 Stanford Court Naples FL 34112 X X x x Donovan Center No email address EBOLI No email address Augustine Perillo Edgwater at Carlton Lakes augielizp@gmail.com x x David Puskaric Egret Cove HOA 239-244-2124 echoamanager@gmail.com X X x x John Moorse Egret Cove HOA 239-253-4998 0cmoorse@gmail.com X X x x Tabatha Butcher EMS Tabatha.Butcher@colliercountvfl.go X X x x v Lynne Gorski Esplanade 317-698-0515 gorski.lynne@gmail.com X x x Larry Francione Feather Sound at Pelican Strand 4148995506 lawrencefrancione@gmail.com Heron Lane x Federal Emergency Management Agency gracia.szczech@fema.dhs.gov X x x Immokalee Corridor Study Mailing List First Name Last Name Home Owner Associations Phone Email Address City State Postal Code Property Management Company Email sent 3/22/21 Blast Email 4/14/21 Email Blast - FDOT Project 5/11/21 Blast Email 7/2/21 Eric Draper Florida Audubon Society -Florida State Office 305.371.6399 edraper@audubon.org 4500 Biscayne Blvd., suite 205 Miami FL 33137 Returned returned as delivery Returned undeliverabl Undeliverable Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services Steve.Bohl@FreshFromFlorida.com Returned returned as delivery Returned undeliverabl Undeliverable Florida Department of Economic Opportunity matt.preston@deo.myflorida.com X x x Florida Department of Environmental Protection deborah.poppell@dep.state.fl.us Returned X Returned undeliverabl Undeliverable Florida Department of Environmental Protection suzanne.e.ray@dep.state.fl.us Returned X Returned undeliverabl Undeliverable Florida Department of State, Division of Historic Resources alyssa.mcmanus@dos.myflorida.com X x x Florida Department of Transportation District One Gwen. Pipkin@dot.state.fLus X x x Florida Department of Transportation District One marlon.bizerra@dot.state.fl.us X x x Florida Department of Transportation District One william.hartmann@dot.state.fl.us Returned X Returned undeliverabl Undeliverable Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commisstion Jennifer.Goff@myFWC.com X x x Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commisstion Scott.Sanders@mvFWC.com Returned returned as undeliverabl Returned undeliverabl Undeliverable Carlos Schomaker Florida Trail Association 352-378-8823 cschomaker@iuno.com 5415 SW 13th Street Gainesville FL 32608 X x x Meredith Budd Florida Wildlife Federation 239-302-1767 meredithb@fwfonline.org X x x Four Seasons Homeowner's Assoc. No email address 9651 Winterview Dr. Naples FL 34109 Gasper Station No email address Russell Tuff Golden Gate Area Civic Assoc. 239-353-1687 secretary@goldengateisgreat.com 5101 31st Ave SW Naples FL 34116 X X x x Michael Ramsey Golden Gate Estates Area Civic Assoc. 239-564-1660 michael.r.ramsey@embargmail.com P.O. Box 990596 Naples FL 34116 X X x x Jessica McGuire Gopher Tortoise Council jgonynor@gmail.com X x x Gulf Coast High School - Principal Joseph Mikulski No email address MikulsJo@collierschools.com HD Development No email address Heritage Greens Community Association csabin@resortgroupinc.com 5621 Strand Blvd Ste 205 Naples FL 34110 X X x x Heritage Greens Community Association jspring@resortgroupinc.com X X x x Heritage Greens Community Association jstraface@resortgroupinc.com X X x x Rayma Rodriguez Heritage Greens Community Association 239-593-1161 raymar@guardianpropertymanage 2261 Heritage Greens Drive Naples FL 34119 X X x x ment.net Heritage Greens Community Association rebeccaO@sandcastleCM.com X X x x Heritage Greens Community Association robert@abilitvteam.com X X x x Hodges University— I called the main number at 1-239-482-0019 and they inform No email address Patricia McNair Huntington Lakes 12396414080 pmcnairconsult@gmail.com x Immokalee Corridor Study Mailing List First Name Last Name Home Owner Associations Phone Email Address City State Postal Code Property Management Company Email sent 3/22/21 Blast Email 4/14/21 Email Blast - FDOT Project 5/11/21 Blast Email 7/2/21 Mercedes Bianco Huntington Lakes Residents' Assoc. 239-851-7862 asstmgf@hlnaples.com 6416 Huntington Lakes Circle Naples FL 34119 Returned X Returned undeliverabl Undeliverable Kris Caldwell Huntington Lakes Residents' Assoc. 239-774-0723 cardinal@cmgflorida.com 4670 Cardinal Way, Suite 302 Naples FL 34112 Cardinal Management Group of FL X X x x Huntington Lakes Residents' Assoc. deb@abilityteam.com X X x x Natalie DiGiovanni Huntington Lakes Residents' Assoc. 239-591-4200 dennis@abilitvteam.com 6736 Lone Oak Blvd. Naples FL 34109 Ability Management Inc. X X x x Huntington Lakes Residents' Assoc. 238-591-1220 donna@hlnaples.com X X x x Huntington Lakes Residents' Assoc. donna@hlnaples.com X X x x Huntington Lakes Residents' Assoc. Jori.Holtman@fsresidential.com X X x x Huntington Lakes Residents' Assoc. k.caldwell@cmgflorida.com X X x x Huntington Lakes Residents' Assoc. lance@smcnaples.com X X x x Huntington Lakes Residents' Assoc. paul@abilityteam.com X X x x Bev Kueter Huntington Lakes Residents' Assoc. 239-263-7403 sunburstmgmt@smcnaples.com 2675 S. Horseshoe Dr. 401 Naples FL 34104 Sunburst Management Corp. X X x x Sandy Houldsworth Ibis Cove HOA (239)348-7340 ibiscove@comcast.net 8120 Logan Way Naples FL 34119 Returned Returned undeliverabl Undeliverable Immokalee Road Center No email address Islandwalk HOA 239-513-0045 islandwalkadmin@kwpmc.com 6155 Towncenter Cir #101 Naples FL 34119 kwpmc X X x x Tarek Elfallah Kimley Horn 813-756-4252 tarek.elfallah@kimley-horn.com Target Plaza Rep X X x x KW Property Management 239-495-3428 cdvorak@kwpropertVmanagement. 3365 Woods Edge Circle, Suite 102 Bonita Springs FL 34134 Laurel lakes HOA Returned Returned undeliverabl Undeliverable com Nicole Angelo Lantana HOA 239-454-1101 nicole.angelo@alliantproperty.com Returned Returned as deliver x Undeliverable Robert Rossi Lantana HOA rrossi02ll@gmail.com X X x x DONALD CIRILLO Laurel Lakes 6317663313 DON.CIRILLO@NATELECSALES.COM x Brian McNamara Laurel Lakes HOA 239-331-0522 laurellakesadmin@kwpmc.com 8217 Laurel Lakes Blvd. Naples FL 34119 kw property management Returned Returned undeliverabl Undeliverable Laurel Oak Elementary School — Principal Dr. Brian Castellani No email address CastelBr@collierschools.com Guillermo Ruiz Livingston Lakes gr@paramontpropertV.com Paramont Property M mt. X X x x Paige Berman Livingston Lakes 239-734-3200 pberman@paramontproperty.com pberman@paramontproperty.com Paramont Property M mt. x Robin Seguin Logan Oakes rseguin1119@vahoo.com X X x x Dave Lobdell Logan Woods/Santa Barbara Civic Assoc. No email address 4880 Tallowood Way Naples FL 34116 Logan Woods/Santa Barbara Civic Assoc. No email address Logan/Immokalee No email address Sharen Lamb Lamb Longshore Lake 860-558-7970 klanbs@comcast.net 4415 Bittern Ct. Naples FL Returned X Returned undeliverabl Undeliverable 10 Immokalee Corridor Study Mailing List First Name Last Name Home Owner Associations Phone Email Address City State Postal Code Property Management Company Email sent 3/22/21 Blast Email 4/14/21 Email Blast - FDOT Project 5/11/21 Blast Email 7/2/21 Barbara Thiele Longshore Lake barbthiele@earthlink.net X x x Dale and Cheryl Horbal Longshore Lake 239-434-8188 dalesaaa@gmail.com X x x Frank Nappo Longshore Lake 239-250-8009 fnnaplesl@gmail.com X x x Robert Parker Longshore Lakes 239-248-9450 Itcflret@aol.com x x Steve Bagniuk Longshore Lakes sbagz@aol.com x x Lisa Luster Longshore Lakes Foundation Inc. (239)566-2304 gm@longshorelake.org 10914 Phoenix Way Naples FL 34119 X X x x Longshore Lakes Foundation Inc. membership@longshorelake.org Naples FL 34119 X X x x Longshore Lakes Foundation Inc. No email address Lonshore Lake No email address Malibu Lake 888-474-1551 No email address 2115 Malibu Lakes Circle Naples FL 34119 TGM Malibu Lakes Stephanie McIntosh Mediterra Community Association 239-825-0542 No email address 15735 Corso Mediterra Circle Naples FL 34110 Cheryl Dromgoole Milano 239-287-5104 dromgoole@comcast.net 15459 Marcello Cir x Montessori Academy of Naples info@naplesmontessori.org X X x x Peter Fagan Naples Club Estates HOA, Inc. 239-465-0671 9015 Strada Stell Ct. 101 Naples FL 34109 National Center for Environmental Health Centers for Disease Control and Preventi tomfrieden@cdc.gov X x x Douglas Fee North Bay Civic Assoc. (239)513-1040; H 592- 1212 feegroup@aol.com 754 Pam Am Ave. Naples FL 34110 X X x x Douglas Fee North Naples Civic Assoc. (239)513-1040; H 592- 1212 feegroup@aol.com 754 Pan Am Ave. Naples FL 34110 X X x x Sal D'Angelo North Naples Fire and Rescue SDAngelo@northcollierfire.com Returned X Returned undeliverabl x North Naples Middle School - Principal Kim LONERGAN No email address LonergKi@collierschools.com Northbrooke Plaza No email address Oak Ridge Middle School — Principal Margaret Jackson No email address JacksoMa@collierschools.com alfie Oakes Oakes Farm 239-229-1645 alfie@oakesfarms.com email sent 5/14/21 x Alfie Oakes Oakes Farm ????? president@oakesfarms.net Returned Returned undeliverabl undeliverable Diane Ebert Old Cypress 239-593-1103 lodiebert@reagan.com X x x Marc Hoffman Old Cypress mahoff767@gmail.com 2840 Lone Pine Lane Naples FL 34119 64625005044 X x x Paul Shea Old Cypress sheapr1948@gmail.com X x x James McNasby Olde Cypress HOA 239-449-9301 0mcnasby@gmail.com X X x x Sherri Gray Olde Cypress HOA 239-454-1101 sherri.grav@alliantproperty.com Returned returned as Deliver x Undeliverable 11 Immokalee Corridor Study Mailing List First Name Last Name Home Owner Associations Phone Email Address City State Postal Code Property Management Company Email sent 3/22/21 Blast Email 4/14/21 Email Blast - FDOT Project 5/11/21 Blast Email 7/2/21 Vicky Pendell Olde Cypress HOA 239-404-8806 vbpendell@gmail.com X X x x Imran Sarwar Olde Cypress Master Assoc. imran@alliantpropertV.com Naples FL 34119- 9777 Alliant Property Manager - CAM X X x x Sherri Gray Olde Cypress Master Assoc. 239-454-1101 sherri.gray@alliantproperty.com Naples FL 34119 Returned X Returned undeliverabl Undeliverable Olde Cypress Master Assoc. 239-592-5381 No email address 7200 Treeline Dr Naples FL 34119 Pebblebrooke Lake Master Assoc. board@ pebblebrookelakeshoa.com X X x x Cynthia Lee Pebblebrooke Lake Master Assoc. c.lee@cmgflorida.com 4670 Cardinal Way, Suite 302 Cardinal Management Group of FL X X x x Cynthia Ann Lee Pebblebrooke Lake Master Assoc. (239)352-0702 pebblebrookelakes@comcast.net 8610 Pebblebrooke Drive Naples FL 34119 X X x x John Vanover Pelican Marsh Community Development District (239)596-6760 lohnlzc@yahoo.com 1920 Curling Avenue Naples FL 34109 Returned X Returned undeliverabl x Pelican Marsh DRI No email address Dorrill Management Group Pelican Marsh Elementary School - Principal Dr. Susan BARCELLINO No email address BarcelSu@collierschools.com Kelly Poka Pelican Marsh Foundation (239)594-7800 kpoka@pelicanmarsh.com 1504 Pelican Marsh Boulevard Naples FL 34109 Returned X Returned undeliverabl Undeliverable Linda Strom Pelican Strand 239-580-8150 hellostrom@yahoo.com Ashford Lane x Jerry Strom Pelican Strand 239-580-8150 jerryestrom@yahoo.com Ashford Lane x Andrew Saluan Pelican Strand - Commercial Plaza andrew@alsrealtygroup.com X X x x Phoenix Property Management (239)631-5237 info@ phoenixgroupnaples.com 5629 Strand Blvd, Suite 412 Naples FL 34104- 3518 X X x x Piper Crossing bloomk@kebmgmt.com keb Management Services LLC Returned Returned undeliverabl Undeliverable Frank Bonacci Platinum Property Management, LLC (239)596-1031 FBonacci@platinumPM.net 1016 Collier Center Way Ste. 102 Naples FL 34110 Returned Returned undeliverabl Undeliverable Progressive Pathways Academy/3 Oaks Academy admin@3oaksacademy.com X X x x David or Monica Govanus Williams Quail Creek Property Owners Assoc. (239)594-6966 gcepoa@gmail.com 4886 Pond Apple Drive Naples FL 34119- 8538 X X x x Alan Raulerson Quail Creek Village Foundation (239)598-9972 araulerson@quailvillagegolfclub.org 11655 Quail Village Way Naples FL 34119 Returned X x Undeliverable Quail II No email address John Gardnet Quail West Homeowners Owner Assoc. (239)593-4102 jgardner@quailwest.com 6289 Burnham Road Naples FL 34119 Returned Returned undeliverabl Undeliverable Keith Laughlin Rails to Trails Conservancy 866-202-9788 No email address P.O. Box 15227 Tallahassee FL 32317 Marsha Moore Real estate agent - Delasol moorefuninthesun@gmail.com X x x Regent Park 230-598-5980 frontdesk@moorepm.com 5603 Naples Blvd. Naples FI 34109 Moore property management LLC X X x x Dan Guernsey Regent Park Master Assoc. (239)596-4076 danguernsey@comcast.net 10640 Regent Circle Naples FL 34109 X X x x MPM Regent Park Single Family HOA & Master 239-598-0098 frontdesk@moorepm.com 5603 Naples Blvd. Naples FL 34109 Moore property management LLC X X x x Rigas No email address 12 Immokalee Corridor Study Mailing List First Name Last Name Home Owner Associations Phone Email Address City State Postal Code Property Management Company Email sent 3/22/21 Blast Email 4/14/21 Email Blast - FDOT Project 5/11/21 Blast Email 7/2/21 Royal Palm Academy Iscarafile@royalpalmacademy.com X X x x Sandcastle Property Manager matt@sandcastlepmb.com X X x x Sandcastle Property Manager tlutz@sandcastlecm.com Returned Returned undeliverabl Undeliverable Dan Schrier Santa Rosa HOA 239-598-5980 Dschrier@moorepm.com X X x x Neil Scancarella Santa Rosa HOA neils121@aol.com X X x x Dennis DiPalma Santa Rosa HOA 216-789-3971 sherri.grav@alliantpropertV.com Returned X x Undeliverable Nancy Burke Santorini HOA 239-963-6352 nancyburke819@gmail.com X X x x Sara Kilduff Santorini HOA 239-649-6357 sara@anchormanagers.com X X x x Lisa Dobyanski Saturnia Lakes Home Owners Assoc. (239)591-1893 Ldobyanski@kwpmc.com 1310 Saturnia Grande Dr Naples FL 34119 kwpmc Returned X Returned undeliverabl Undeliverable Carol Mulready Sharondale, c/o ADVANCED PROPERTY MANAGEMENT (239)252-8967 advancedsue@aol.com 1035 COLLIER CENTER WAY #7 Naples FL 34110 Advanced Property Management X X x x Jonathan Ullman Sierra Club, South Florida Regional Office 305-567-0022 0onathan.ullman@sierraclub.org 300 Aragon Ave, suite 360 Coral Gables FL 33134 X x x Katie Davis Sierra Club, South Florida Regional Office kdavis2468@gmail.com Doug Young South Florida Audubon Society dyoung@southfloridaaudubon.org X x x Southbrooke support@officespace.com X X x x Joe Mathura St. Croix Apartments 239-593-3434 stcroix@presidiocondo.com x x Stonebridge Country Club Community Association 239-594-5200 info@stonebridgecountryclub.com X X x x Tim Jones Stonebridge Country Club Community Association 239-594-5200 ILones@stonebridgecountryclub.corr 2100 Winding Oaks Way Naples FL 34109 X X x x Damian Thomas Strada Bella HOA 630-258-1690 damianthoma@gmail.com X X x x Nicole Angelo Strada Bella HOA 239-454-1101 nicole.angelo@alliantproperty.com Returned Returned as delivery Returned undeliverabl Undeliverable Ingrid Jimenez Summer Lakes Apartments II, Ltd. 239-320-7062 summerlakes@richmanmgt.com 5520 Jonquil Ln Naples FL 34109 Richman Property Services, Inc X X x x David J. Blouir Tarpon Cove Community Master Assoc. 239-451-1988 davidblouir@towneproperties.com 1045 Tarpon Cove Dr. Unit 104 Naples FL 34110 Returned X x Undeliverable Floyd Rodgers Terramar HOA floydrodgers@gmail.com X X x x Kristin Mello Terramar HOA 239-596-522 kristinm@sandcastle.com X X x x Vince Scriboni Terramar HOA 215-896-7443 vscriboni@verizon.net X X x x Dennis Lively The Ability Team dennis@abilityteam.com x x The Club at Olde Cypress 239-666-7631 info@oldecypress.com 7165 Treeline Drive Naples FL 34119 X X x x Jonathan The Club at Olde Cypress jamiel@oldecypress.com Renee Kulaga The Club at Olde Cypress 239-596-4797 rkulaga@oldecypress.com 7165 Treeline Drive Naples FL 34119 X 13 Immokalee Corridor Study Mailing List First Name Last Name Home Owner Associations Phone Email Address City State Postal Property Email Blast Email Blast Email Code Management sent Email Blast - 7/2/21 Company 3/22/21 4/14/21 FDOT Project 5/11/21 Jim Smith The Greater Naples Chamber of Commerce 239-262-6376 info@napleschamber.org 2390 Tamiami Trail North, suite 210 Naples FL 34103 X x x Temperince Morgan The Nature Conservancy 407-682-3664 tmorgan@tnc.org 2500 Maitland Center Parkway, suite Altamonte SprinE FL 32751 X x x Alesia Galuppo The Strand 239-596-1719 alesia.galuppo@thestrandclub.com 5840 Strand Blvd. Naples FL 34110 X X x x The Strand x Beth Thompson 2246563620 bt515@hotmail.com The Strand x Linda Strom hellostrom@yahoo.com The Strand x Jerry Strom hellostrom@yahoo.com Dr. Joseph Crivelli The Strand 239-594-1148 jandperivelli@gmail.com Returned Returned - Returned Undeliverable delivery undeliverabl Lori Caras Turnbury HOA (239)596-1387 loricaras@comcast.net 227 Channing Court Naples FL 34110 X X x x X x x U.S. Army Corps of Engineers south.florida.ao@usace.army.mil X x x U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Regulator Branch, Jacksonville District Offices randy.l.turner@usace.army.mil X x x U.S. Department of Agriculture -Southern Region Natural Resources Conservation Se rick.a.robbins@fl.usda.gov X x x U.S. Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, brandon.howard@noaa.gov X x x U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development FL Webmanager@hud.gov X x x U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service, Southeast Region anita_barnett@nps.gov X x x U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Fish & Wildlife Servie, Southeast Region - Regil john_wrublik@fws.gov Veterans Memorial Elementary— Principal Jessica Vieira No email address vieiraie@collierschools.com Willoughby Gardens No email address Windsong Club Apartments 239-566-8801 No email address x Vicky Rengifo Windsong Club Apartments 239-566-8801 windsongclub@broadmg.com 11086 Windsong Circle Bonita Springs FL 34109 Broad Management X X x x Group Angela angele.morcos@gmail.com x x Bernie Mraz bnmraz526@comcast.net Connie Deane connie.deane@colliercountvfl.gov x x x x Carol Chowanic 248-760-5617 cschirr@aol.com Douglas wilson 239-348-9191 doug34120@gmail.com 616 Sanctuary Rd Naples FL 34120 x x x Mary Gignac 269-861-1971 gignacmary@gmail.com x Mary Gignac 12698611971 gignacmary@gmail.com x Jean Mark 16177910149 jeannie705@gmail.com k@pa ramontproperty.com in Paramont Property X X x x M mt. 14 Immokalee Corridor Study Mailing List First Name Last Name Home Owner Associations Phone Email Address City State Postal Property Email Blast Email Blast Email Code Management sent Email Blast - 7/2/21 Company 3/22/21 4/14/21 FDOT Project 5/11/21 Jeff Rodgers 260-341-5800 jrodgers@dekalbplastics.com X X x x Sharen Lamb 860-558-7970 klambs@comcast.net 4415 Bittern Ct. x x Logan Brimmer 239-774-0723 x307 I.brimmer@cmgflorida.com Cardinal Management x Group Lara Moreda 239-774-0723 I.moreda@cmgfIorida.com Cardinal Management X Group x Laurel Stoltzner (847) 477-1306 Ljstiltz@comcast.net x Margaret Sudor 4844378844 masmts@aol.com x Normand Cote 6037675226 ncote@ngcstructural.com NGC Structural LLC x James Johnson 4133299722 Rjohnson523@aol.com x Stephen Gordon 8053906366 sigordo@msn.com Edgewater HCA CRE Properties 239-334-3040 teamtrinity@trinitycre.com 9250 Corkscrew Road #13 Estero FL 33928 TCG Pulse / Trinity x Group Steven Bracci 239-596-2635 Steve@braccilaw.com 9015 Strada Stell Ct. 102 Naples FL 34109 15 Appendix E.3 Agency Meeting Summaries MEETING SUMMARY Cai['%r County ,oacobs FDOT Coordination Meeting Minutes PROJECT: Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study MEETING DATE: April 2, 2021 LOCATION: Microsoft Teams PURPOSE: To discuss the study methodology and recommendations, focusing on the I- 75 and Immokalee Rd. interchange. ATTENDEES: County: Lorraine Lantz, Trinity Scott, Jay Ahmad, Tony Khawaja, Dennis McCoy. FDOT: Christopher Simpron, Joseph Samus, Joshua Jester, Luis Diaz, Richard Oujevolk, OJ (guest). Jacobs: Bill Gramer, Robert Grubel, Tom Ross, Nathan Lunsford, Felicia Kirby. Stantec: Nicole Harris. vhb: Jorge Tolosa. The recommended improvement at the I-75 and Immokalee Rd. interchange is a Diverging Diamond Interchange. Although this would not provide the lowest overall V/C ratio, it is the most cost-effective solution compared to the significant construction cost of a Partial Cloverleaf. There are a few interim improvements recommended at the I-75 interchange and will be discussed further at the next FDOT Coordination Meeting, after the Study is approved by the BCC. FDOT did not have any comment at this time. These interim improvements included: • Redesignate Lanes - accommodate peak traffic as it transitions between AM and PM. An example is located at the 1-75 and Golden Gate Parkway interchange (Exit 105) southbound approach. • Extend Ramp Lengths -extend within limits up to gore point (up to FHWA boundary) o Have we considered adding a second lane merging off I-75 at the gore point since projected backups will be severe? o Jacobs will include this recommendation for FDOT in the Final Report Ramp Signal - add second lane for the northbound on -ramp movement from westbound traffic Livingston Road: The recommended improvement is a grade separated overpass. Other options were evaluated however due to the limited ROW, proximity of adjacent developments and business, and transmission lines running parallel to Livingston Road, this is the most effective, feasible solution. It is recommended to proceed directly with the overpass. It was suggested to evaluate the proposed 4-lane bridge for future needs of a 6- lane facility. The County recommended a hammerhead if 6 lanes are required for future growth, due to ROW constraints. There will be a significant increase in construction cost to construct a hammerhead bridge. FOOT COORDINATION MEETING MINUTES FDOT released the 2045 D1RPM model early this year, however this Study used the D1RPM 2040 volumes as that was the latest available during the traffic modeling performed for this study in 2019. FDOT is prioritizing the I-75 and Immokalee Rd interchange. They have the same recommendation in their Selected Interchange Analysis Report (SIAR) analysis from 2018. I-75 SW Connect Study - Met with MPO. This interchange will be coming to the top of the priorities. A draft report expected is expected February 2022. Joshua Jester, with FDOT, is main point of contact for this study. Action Items• 1. Provide the cost estimate for DDI. It was suggested the delays to construct may result in another ultimate improvement. a. Cost estimate will be provided with the Final Report 2. FDOT would like additional coordination with the County after this study is approved by the BCC 3. FDOT to receive a copy of the PPT from this meeting 4. FDOT to receive the Final Report for this Study when complete \\SWFFPP01\PROJ\COLLI ER_COUNTY\00.SWF. PROJECTS\01 _COLLIER\2019.02.18.IMMOKCORRIDORSTUDY\MEETINGS\FDOT_COORDINATION 4.2.21\FDOT MEETING MINUTES 4.2.21.DOC 2 ,*d ,corn or Congestion Study DOT Coordination Fleeting April 2,, 2021 Meeting Agenda 1. Introductions 2. Project Purpose and Goals 3. 2045 LRTP Cost Feasible Projects 4. Study Methodology 5. Traffic Projections 6. ICE Analysis and Recommendations for 1-75 • Interim and Ultimate 7. Project Timeline and Next Steps 8. Optional Topic: Recommendations for other Intersections within Study 9. FDOT's Southwest Connect 1-75 South Corridor Project (FDOT Speaker) Project Limits and Goals Study Limits ■ Immokalee Rd. from Livingston Rd. to Logan Blvd. 9 intersections evaluated ■ A: Livingston Rd. ■ B: Juliet Blvd./Strand Blvd. ■ C: Southbound On/Off Ramps 1-75 ■ D: Northbound On/Off Ramps 1-75 ■ E: Northbrooke Dr./Tarpon Bay Blvd. ■ F: Oakes Blvd. ■ G: Valewood Dr. ■ H: Executive Dr. ■ I: Logan Blvd. Project Purpose and Goals ✓ To analyze the existing and future traffic conditions along the Immokalee Rd. corridor ✓ To model and project future traffic volumes and level of service (LOS) for both 5-year (2025) and 20-year (2040) periods ✓ Identify corridor improvements that will accommodate future growth 2045 LRTP Cost Feasible Plan Projects Table 6-2. Collier MPO 2045 LRTP Cost feasible Plan Projects — FUOT Other Roads Projects and Local Roadway Projects (in milirons 5) 4bn Period 1 ITPI: Plan Perlod 2: Plan Period 3: Plan Period 4: OA ROW and 2021-7.Q25 zo26-2038 2031-2035 2036-2045 County DA PpE-fHG CST Tata! tnst Total Project 71P Funding 202E,2045 Map cost 2021-25 (YOES fitalIS Fiulldng 113 Farilitv LhnYts lrmm Lhw[s to oestrl tion PLK 2619 5 (vi}E PRE-ENG AOW {ST PR&EN6 AOw C5Y PHE-ENG ROW M PRE-FNG ROW CS7 wlthrl n SISL Costs Sauce PLAN PEREQD z CDmSTAu€I10f4 # LJNDM PRMEM 12 Everglades Blvd VandtfbllVBchRd RandaJlfiivd Widen frottt2-lama $32.SU $43,17 $43-27 rxuffo Ext ra 4-1a nes 23 145I5±1-931 Interchange GuklEm Gate Pkwy Interchange 59M $12.81 $0.5$ 53.234 OA —.9 m rovenw.r 25 1-75ISR493� lotookafealld Interchange 59m $um $8$8 $1234 OA I mprovenwnt 16D1 o ed s7 0I1 WL41 Read ICR an& fvergcades Blvd OIl Well Grade Rd WI den from 2-{ane3 MIA OAM W.93 548.23 cuuity 60144 m 6-Lanes 57 LIS41ISANI(Tamfaml G000ketm-Frank Majorinrersecaan $13110 $17.01 $0.63 $1639 OA Trail El Rd I mp ravertleht Sfi 4Jfi41I5itMIlTaFWaml GrEvswayRd 6LFarm Rd Widen from2-Lanata $31.99 $4190 $3.91 53799 CIA Trail E h L9fpJ - 66 ImmnkaieeRd uvrngstonRd Majorlatersecbun $2450 •.t $2fiS2 $25.P2 cxuffo Improvement PLAN PERMOA CON STRLOrMN FUN QED PROJEC15 11 Evergtades Blvd Randall Blvd Scuth of Di well Ad Wonen from 2-La nes $16-42 529-19 S29-1$ County to 4-La ri s $73.01 SA07 $63.97 QA 22 1-75(SR-93)Interrhange VldhltyOf Newlntrcharip $4216 I—) Ever edes Blvd 31 Immoka!ee Rd [CA 946) SFI 29 AAFPBfk SFvd WIEIgn from 242 nes $3M $7.2Q $730 County to 4 lanes 36 LaganMvd PIneRidge Na Va ndeTbuhBea ctiRd udl!nfrom2-lanes $22-23 S3297 53"7 County In "nE5 S3 WES MoxStrRKE3rt Vollso-Blvd utdeLeague Rd reaneAve Wester Carson Rd GDI den Cate filvd Newt -Lane Road New 2-Lane Head $31I11 $36-15 S551 $6335 $S51 SG3-3S county [aunty 65 I NDandah la m a- Lar -1 97 Immokalee Rd Logan Blvd AdaJor lnter Ilnn $I1-M -- $20.67 Mb-7 Oolnly II nters ecbon) mprovement PRE-ENGtrxludes PQ$Eand Design Prewt Day Cost _Rlgat-bf-Way �� CC—Lructian YOE Year of Expemfiture In Methodology: Land Use and Data Collection Land Use ■ North side of the corridor is approaching buildout ■ Constrained by Cocohatchee Canal ■ South side of the corridor is dense with few remaining parcels available for development Data Collection • Segment and Turning movement counts (TMCs) were collected from March 7-26, 2019. Taken during peak hour, peak tourist season, and when schools were in session • Historical annual average daily traffic (AADT) volumes were obtained for 1-75 from FDOT • Collier County Traffic Counts were used to establish growth rate • District 1 Regional Planning Model (D1 RPM) projections were incorporated into study Methodology: Traffic Projection Methodology and Refinements Traffic Projection methods: • FDOT Traffic Trends Analysis • D1 RPM • Minimum Annual Growth Rate • Minimum 2% annual growth rate to all traffic volumes, except approaches nearing/reached build out. Amin imum 1 % annual growth rate was applied to approaches nearing/reached build out, which included the southbound approaches of Strand Boulevard, Northbrooke Drive, Valewood Drive, and Executive Drive and the northbound approach of Oakes Boulevard. • Examined vested trip bank volumes for future land use development however did not affect projections ✓ 2040 Traffic Projections were developed for an upper range (Worst -case Scenario) and lower range (Best -case Scenario) to forecast future LOS ✓ Modeled using Trafficware's SYNCHRO 10 Software ✓ Evaluated No -Build Scenario, Conventional Improvements, and Innovative Improvements 2040 Projected Traffic Volumes r comt Scurre stixtiona Location, ExIsting Count, Peak Season Conversion Adj - i Exisd • i E DI RPM + tioF+ Historical 216 RegressionGrowth Highest+ , 567 County IrnmokaLee Rd. Airport Pulling Livingston Rd- 55,967 1.06 59,400 82,900 101,500 90,000 101,500 90,000 2.58% 2.00% Rd. 597 County Livingston Rd. Vanderbilt Beach Immokalee Rd- 35,659 0.97 34,600 62,290 60,800 52,500 62,290 52,500 2.84% 2.01% Rd. 673 County Livingston Rd. Immokalee Rd. Veterans 27r318 0.97 26,500 74,040 34,700 40,200 74,040 5.01% 1.29% MemoriaL Blvd. 679 County Immokalee Rd- Livingston Rd- I-75 53r845 0.98 52,800 89,580 71,800 80,000 89,580 "I,� .. 2.550k 1.47% 7032 FDOT 1-75 5outhbound On- Immokalee Road I-75 8,900 0.97 8,700 9,160 22,600 13,400 22,600 -, , 4.43% 1.98% Ramp 7034 FDOT I-75 Southbound Off- I-75 Immokalee Rd- 1 Br0w 0.97 17,500 20,730 33,300 27,000 33.300 2.97% 1.99% Ramp 747 County Immokalee Rd- H75 South6ound I-75 73r829 0.98 72,400 90,580 NIA 109r700 109,700 2.00% 1.07% Ramps Northbound Ramps 7031 FDOT 1-75 Northbound Off- I-75 Immokalee Rd- 8,800 0.97 8,600 7r740 20,000 13,200 - :,::: _ _ =,' 3.91°k 1.97% Ramp 7033 FDOT 1-75 Northbound 0n- Immokalee Rd. I-75 18,500 0-97 18,000 18,270 34,300 27,800 =,= :1: -7,v,10 2.970k 2.00% Ramp 701 County Immokalee Rd. Oakes Blvd. Valewaad Dr- 53,645 0-98 52,600 84,530 79,900 78,900 84,530 79,900 2.28% 1.95% 682 County Oakes Blvd- Vanderbilt Beach Immokalee Rd- 4,389 0.98 4,400 9r750 5,000 6,600 9r750 5,000 3.86% 0.61% Rd. 568 County IrnmakaLee Rd- I-75 Logan Blvd. 50,705 1.06 53,800 92,890 45,800 81,500 92,990 65,800 2.63% 0.96% 644 County Logan Blvd- Vanderbilt Beach Immokalee Rd- 1 2r2 62 0.98 12,100 4r630 24,200 18,300 24,200 113,300 3.36% 1.99% Rd. 656 County ImmokaLeeRd-Logan Blvd- Collier Blvd- 41,728 0.98 40,90m 75,420 74,800 62,000 75,420 62,000 2-960k 2.00% Projected TMV's for 1-75 AM Peak also a 4993 1+78 lan 355 883 id79 PM Peak 449 0 loas 1337 0 N J$6d � 2d1; YV E 2947 45 a 0 a Southbound 2792 5165 2393 0 1662 14d0 5160 173 3619 AM Peak 2M FM22 5233 2395 PM Peak 1712 676 5077 mg 3365 0 2025 1 E17 0 1617 0 0 0 H w E 5 523 2 342 0 1a67 9B7 1057 0 1057 0 0 0 W 1N E 1-1 418 I 0 I 356 1 4 0 774 774 Northbound 1142 3377 2575 5541 0 2164 361 1675 126 � 472^ 0 3045 2792 2792 p ! I 1� 0 AM PEa1c w37i F a uie 4420 0 N1 7093 2156 w E 2673 517 5 4 fl 8 11227 Il�r 6 1227 2363 a PM Pmk fSM :ss4 Lem 0 3%5 3b3d V. a a2�6 -i n O 9 ms o- �c= Southbound 0 3fiS8 30id �� 73g�. 719 3574 �T Pp04 '� 7- 2175 a f� 2f75 AM Peak 0 0 0 4198 7316 — 65� 2�5� N Yy E 91<2 a 5 1106 3 509 q V� I � 1719 1710 1421 0 �� 1L21 PM Peak 0 a a •fm one N ?i1 : 3615 w E 452: 0 s Td3 a a#! 0 U 1975 MS 2040 Northbound fd$2 4542 3CE4 7R2 0 9604 $f'2'b9 1741 6-D 0 +s�o 2040 No -Build LOS Pea k LOS and 1 per Direction No. of Irytersection Hour EBL EBY EBR WBL WOT WBR NBL NBT NBR 56L 5BT SBR Movements with LOS F D B F F C F F F F F F # Livingston 204 52 18 231 314 33 359 272 317 890 859 1000+ Rd F F C F D C F F F F F F PM 210 184 22 133 44 32 249 531 519 988 949 1000+ E C A F F A F E B F E # 4 Strand Blvd/ 58 33 4 91 358 10 135 79 15 102 67 JrilietBlvd F F B F C A F F F F F P1 $ 86 221 11 270 24 2 264 95 199 176 198 F B C E F F Awl 3 1-7556On/ 297 16 29 56 250 281 Off Ramps F B D 0 F 0 PM, 2 28-+ 19 40 54 309 49 C D F F F F # 4 1-75 NB On/ 23 54 149 567 6011 142 C E F E F F Off Ramps PM 3 29 58h 66 511 268 F C A F A F F C F F F Narthbraake AM 8 DrlTarpon 287 33 5 92 280 0.1 625 625 29 217 120 591 F F A F D A F F C F F B Bay BLvd PM 7 158 121 7 90 40 0 394 391 26 255 96 18 F B A F F A F E F F # 6 Valewood 220 14 0 99 320 0 1431 60 150 291 Dr F F A F D A E F D PM 5 334 195 0 90 41 0 58 86 39 F E B F F 3 F D F F F # 7 Logan Blvd 89 58 20 143 372 12 173 80 47 198 262 248 F F # F C A F F F F F D PM 8 109 1651 1.2 L61 31 2 254 103 770 426 411 39 Recommendations for the 1-75 Interchange 1-75 Interchange ICE Analysis 19-9 a i - rti Paal Cloverleaf A E-W i7-96 1 1.5 pjartral C [OVE O 6 E•W 1.02 .2 1.5 D71vaMmg Diamond htiarcllenpe E-W 1.14 .3 3.5 Single Paint E-W 122 4 2.4 1 �IeprsceA Lett turn litrlerctsongtl E•4Y-15 'S 3.BT 5 2-3 DimondE•W 2 Shyly Point N-5 5 66 7 2.4 Partial Clovelleaf A N-9 5-79 a 1.5 parttal Clovarlaif B M-S 6.01 9 1.6 OisPlaud LdA Turn jlfMreFiarsgrtj M-3 i3 1E 1 C 2.4 ■ PAM INI cl*ftrlt,al & E-W 1.17 4,5 Parlial CPvvcrie$F A E-W 1.17 t,b Dlwvrgkrrp Dliunond �terdiange E-W 1-17 E SH14te Poldl F-,W Dlsplat" Loft Turn rhaWrthiimjmX E•W Olamvnd E-W 1.aa 4 2A 2A 2.4 2.90 fi 5,91 6 Parttiel Llaverleof A N-S 6.70 7 1-6 Mlle Pulrtl N-S 5.15 B 24 Padiel ClavUrlaaf 9 N-S 5.B7 9 1.6 Displaced Loft Turn tI nwrChamq, i NS 6.40 10 2-+r Existing Immokalee Rd Typical Section under 1-75 Proposed Immokalee Rd Typical Section under 1-75 "DDI" I Mill and Resurface Reconstruct i P Mill and Resurface :xisting mmokaLee Rd Typical Section ender 1-75 roposed nmokaLee Rd ypical Section nder 1-75 "DDI'l Proposed Conceptual of the f 4 Diverging Diamond Interchange ir 5 M L ..� f iAnA. �J } ■ 1 2040 No -Build vs. DDI MG. of Movements control No -Build AM F B C E F F Southbound OnlOff 56 3 297 145 29 250 281 PM F B 0 F D Ramps D 2 284 19 40 54 309 49 No -Build AM C D F F F F Northbound On/aff 4 23 54 149 567 60S 142 FM C E F E F F Ramps a 29 58 96 66 511 268 DDI Light 1 Light 2 Light 3 Light4 Lights Ligm 6 (Best case) V)ST `Jb'JL EBT NWT EBT SEL ;',BT NWL SEL SWR EBT NEF AM D i E D A .. A A F F A 3 45 72 36 ti 0 3 88 109 '1 'I+ t PM = A B E A F. A A 01 E A E. t] I 11 3 U It '_ 54 v 1 38 DOI L'ghi 1 Light 2 Lignt 3 -ight4 Lig•-t 5 Light 6 (Worst case, Optimized') U'JBT ,L EBT NWT EBT SEL WBT NWL SEL SWR EBT NER AM E D E A E A A F F A C L 2 .8 t 52 59 0 58 1 10 264 261 2 28 PM C F E A B A A F F A D \ • • 3 2b 0 79 7 17 0 3 107 103 9 50 • DDI Light 1 Light 2 Light 3 Light 4 Light 5 Light 6 • (Worst case, Biased'} WBT NWL EBT NWT EBT SEL IVBT NWL SEL SWR EBT NER AM E A F E A C A A F F A C 3 68 3 81 68 0 33 1 16 263 264 2 28 RM C A F E B E A A F F A D 3 28 0 1C 9 75 19 59 0 5 109 104 9 50 "Signattiming was adjusted to either optimize each movementor remain biasedto accommodate lawerdelays forthe east and west through mGvements. Proposed Interim (2025) Improvements at 1-75: Redesignate Lanes • Redesignate the existing right -turn lanes to allow for northbound and southbound off ramps to convert to a shared turn lane servicing east and westbound turning movements onto Immokalee Road. This will allow the lane to accommodate peak traffic as it transitions between AM and PM. Existing: rwi 4J 6 6mW Proposed: sas a a15 AM Peak KN 115a 4 NF5U 2M 'M 14n W E Sig t833 3 S 5 2M so �� a an 1473 1-n �t a PM Pak 44B a tm! 1937 O M IF173 1557 49Ei SiYl W E Sim 2W7 454 a 3518 Southbound I Northbound 1617 AM Peak me • 513 N IF023377 W E W41 2= 6 5 2164 0 V 967 go 5057 Q �� sos7 PM Paak s71 2 eie r� 36, 167s 5Q77 n 2e>N WE 10 } 4720 33" Q 5 Q 3045 I- & 41e 9 Existing: e �� 7774 A Proposed: 16 Proposed Interim (2025) Improvements at 1-75: Extend Ramp Length • Extend the length of the off ramps as they merge off 1-75 to assist with traffic backed up onto the through lanes along 1-75 during the peak period Proposed Interim (2025) Improvements at 1-75: Ramp Signal • Add a second through/merge lane for the northbound on -ramp movement from westbound traffic off Immokalee Road using the existing through lane Proposed Interim (2025) Improvements at 1-75: Safety Modifications • Make minor modifications to the northbound on -ramp geometry and modify the median to prohibit westbound vehicles on Immokalee Road from skipping the on -ramp entrance lanes and making illegal right turns at the signal to access the on -ramp Pf, Next Steps: • Collect Public Input until April 16 • Coordination with FDOT • Finalize Report • Present Recommendations to BCC 1 • Coordination with FDOT • Pursue TRIP & CIGP Grants for Livingston Rd Overpass :IM[*l0 FDOT's Southwest Connect 1-75 South Corridor Project - Project Update Thankyou --WNW-.Aim fU, Kirby, Felicia Subject: Immokalee Rd. Corridor Congestion Study - Collier County Sheriff's Office Location: Microsoft Teams Meeting Start: Thu 4/22/2021 2:00 PM End: Thu 4/22/2021 3:00 PM Recurrence: (none) Meeting Status: Meeting organizer Organizer: Kirby, Felicia Required AttendeesKirby, Felicia; Gramer, Bill/SWF; LantzLorraine; Thomas.Orr@colliersheriff.org Optional Attendees:Lunsford, Nathan/SWF; Robert Grubel (Robert.Grubel@jacobs.com); Ronny Turi - 2214; Richard Jackson - 2224 Good morning — This meeting is to discuss the Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study recommendations with the Collier County Sheriff's Office. Lt. Orr - Please forward this meeting to anyone you'd like to join on the call. Microsoft Teams meeting Join on your computer or mobile app Click here to join the meeting Join with a video conferencing device 493366865@t.plcm.vc Video Conference ID: 116 065 816 9 Alternate VTC dialing instructions Learn More I Meeting options 1 Appendix E.4 Community Meeting Summaries - Carlton Lake HOA Meeting -April 30, 2021 - Virtual Public Meeting Registrants - Virtual Public Meeting Additional Questions - Virtual Public Meeting Presentation Chat Box Questions and Answers - Virtual Public Meeting Presentation Slides SIGN IN SHEET: April 30, 2021 Carlton lakes Immokalee Road Congestion Corridor Studv Name Mailing Address Email Address Phone Number 3411c; 513'9 - 2 G(4 cAe�) . �C'v IP A 2 P, rW - 3C L ` 3 ; i 5 2 Mli- Sc Hv� 2�� /_=rC J,%7/0 �� ►'n 1 �i t r� ,�, f D.� �' /�z. '�L.�i��=�S' L. ,� 23l' 4 U;' - 7- 1 2 UZ Et 5 230 R p 1,V 1-7,Nf Z W ,0 -)7. 3 iz , 2- i 3, .3 q 6 5i %/ �rnv"lt,Z .),�(CJG'f �rJ<�✓<'r( �� ll. i,.rlrr �/%t�,('✓. ��J ,�39- ��3/- % �� 6 I a� �.� �..��v\ z �,I�, e� �� nS. � ln, �� u�. �� ;�f ►Q� ;'�'n �- 12��v a3�-4g�- --� 7— 3 cwj 13 e- La��. ?Z� -- 8 zz gl c es� �►� , 9 10 11 12 1.3 14 15 '4 From: LantzLorraine To: Debbie Littman Cc: Kirby, Felicia Subject: [EXTERNAL] RE: additional questions Date: Wednesday, May 26, 2021 8:28:19 AM Ms. Littman, Thank you for forwarding these questions to us. Many seem similar to the questions we received. We will try to address them directly in the presentation. Thank you. Respectfully, Lorraine Lorraine M. Lantz, AICP Principal Planner C;ori;-r Ceo-unty Collier County Capital Projects, Planning, Impact Fees & Program Management NOTE: Email Address Has Changed 2685 S. Horseshoe Drive, Suite #103 Naples, FL 34104 Phone: (239) 252-5779 Lorraine. Lantz@CollierCountyFL.aov From: Debbie Littman <deb.lakeview@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2021 9:20 PM To: LantzLorraine <Lorraine.Lantz@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: additional questions EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Lorraine, I just received these questions. If it is not too late and if not redundant, could someone also address these questions. I am looking forward to your program on Thursday, Sincerely, Debbie Littman, President Carlton Lakes 1. Has a traffic noise study been completed to determine the impact of the overpass on surrounding communities at the Livingston & Immokalee intersection? 2. Will noise barrier walls be installed on the overpass? 3. How will a driver access the South -bound lanes on Livingston from both the North & South Carlton Lakes Blvd gates? o Will the existing U-turn lane located on Livingston North of Carlton Lakes Blvd - South Main Gate remain? o Will a traffic light be installed at Carlton Lake Blvd- North Gate & Livingston for left turns to access South bound Livingston lanes due to the projected increase in traffic? 4. Will there still be a left turn lane from South -bound Livingston to enter Carlton Lakes Blvd South Main Gate entrance for residents & vendors that must use the entry code kiosk? 5. Please see attached photo. What do the three red -dashed lines mean? The middle line, which is not identified with a letter bisects our carport and building. Will vehicles be visible at this point? Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. Please submit your questions or comments about the Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study in Order Date First Name Last Name Email Cell Phone the text box below. Company Collier County 2021-05-14 Lorraine Lantz Lorraine.Lantz@colliercountyfl.gov 2392525779 Just testing to make sure it works. Government 2021-05-14 Felicia Kirby felicia.kirby2@jacobs.com 2021-05-14 felicia kirby feliciamkirby@yahoo.com 2021-OS-14 Deborah Littman 2021-05-14 Stephen Gordon 2021-05-14 David Appleby Jr 2021-05-14 lean Mark 2021-05-14 Beth Majors 2021-05-15 Rick Tierney 2021-05-15 Patricia Canfield 2021-05-15 Augustine Perillo 2021-05-15 Rae Smith-Higbie 2021-OS-15 Victor Atsinger 2021-05-15 carole Noren 2021-OS-15 Dawn Miller 2021-05-15 Shellie Specter 2021-OS-15 Nan Roytberg 2021-05-15 Barbara Kornek 2021-05-16 Rosemary Christie 2021-05-16 Charles/Anne Edwards 2021-05-16 Richard Catania 2021-05-16 Rick Tessmer 2021-05-16 Mario 2021-05-16 Susan 2021-05-17 Donna 2021-05-17 Nicholas 2021-OS-17 thris 2021-05-17 Gary 2021-OS-17 Gwen 2021-05-17 Adam 2021-05-17 Linda 2021-05-17 JOHN 2021-OS-17 Mary 2021-05-17 Robert 2021-05-17 John 2021-05-17 Elizabeth 2021-OS-17 Brenda 2021-05-17 Bruce 2021-05-17 Charlotte 2021-05-17 Ali 2021-OS-17 Mary 2021-05-17 Steve 2021-OS-17 William 2021-OS-17 JANE 2021-05-17 Mark Cardamone Mulgrew Gentzel Mealey vitale Campbell Rasiwala Ras wala Mitchell PANAGIDES Zizzo Epstein McHugh McHugh ChilArom Mehl Mayne Ellbeg Kulaga Chandley LYTLE Chowanic 2021-OS-17 Renate LaCroix 2021-05-17 James LaCroix 2021-05-17 Lora Boross 2021-05-17 robert bree 2021-05-17 Bruce Kotila deb.lakeview@gmaii.com sigordo@msn.com dwapplebyjr@gmaii.com jeannie705@gmail.com bethmajors@aol.com rtier55@gmaiLcom pattycanf@gmail.com augielizp@gmaiLcom smithhigbie@gmail.com vatsinger@gmail.com contessa6462@gmail.com xxooiessie@yahoo.com 6seashell@gmail.com nroytberg@gmail.com jerseygirlbek@gmail.com rcnaples58@gmaiLcom cae303@aol.com ricshawl943@yahoo.com ricktessmer@hotmaii.com markocommando@gmall.com swm1982@aol.com gentzel@comcast.net mealey.nicholas@gmaii.com cvita@slomins.com garycampbell-cpa@msn.com adam.gwen.msiwala@gmall.com adam@dsdhomes.net chewylle@gmail.com J PANAG I DES@YAHOO.COM maryzizzo@icloud.com technomed@yahoo.com bomcg06@gmail.com 2mchugh2@gmail.com brendaot@gmail.com bfinehl@yahoo.com maynec@aol.com amack64@gmail.com mellbeg@aol.com stevekulaga@mac.com wo@chandley.net lytledean@AOL.com mc472@sbcglobal.net How will these changes impact the north entrance/exit to Carlton Lakes? Are we guaranteed a north bound lane through the intersection to permit access to the south entrance to Carlton Lakes? Will the county commit to planting additional trees between the Carlton Lakes Livingston Wall/preserve Carlton Lakes Master 614-619-0985 and the roadway? Association 8053906366 Edgewater HOA 6177910149 3147911159 5152081471 Carlton Lakes Please we would like you to consider another entryway to 175 through Vanderbilt Beach ? That would ease the traffic on Immokalee Road. Thanks 9084890678 6142716142 4076948853 631-523-3275 2392094300 Sellstate Prime 9476504913 - None - 8452698065 708 212 5611 12392163210 239-682-3379 How will the CL entrances on Livingston Rd be affected? In lieu of the additional traffic from the two communities being built on Livingston Rd., will a traffic light be installed on the North Entrance to be 1912397769930 shared with the Visari Community? 5164739139 239-776-0008 239-770-0942 2396319928 9473456995 3392222198 3392222198 2395957018 3096578464 2394316043 4124009055 6143021218 renate.lacroixPuticaleaseco.com 2488808218 jandwelectric@yahoo.com 5862560444 lorabhere2@aol.com rdbree2002@yahoo.com 6179051340 kotila@newnorth.net 2021-05-17 Marius Stoia askmarius@gmail.com 6468085702 A stop light is necessary for safety at the back entrance to Carlton Lakes Blvd, across from Delasol, whether or not this project gets approved. I do not approve of this expansion as it will place more traffic burden on Livingston and make it a more dangerous road. Retired How will Carlton Lakes specifically be affected? Retired CARLTON LAKES CLUBHOUSE How will putting an overpass on Livingston, which reduces the number of lanes on Livingston and impacts many communities, help Immokalee Road congestion? Has the study worked to explore alternatives to putting in an overpass? Does this recommendation take into account the beautification and desirability of Naples as one of Florida's premier and upscale destinations? How does such an expensive and time consuming project, with such significant impact on surrounding communities, truly benefit the community in the long run? How will putting an overpass on Livingston, which reduces the number of lanes on Livingston and impacts many communities, help Immokalee Road congestion? Has the study worked to explore alternatives to putting in an overpass? Does this recommendation take into account the beautification and desirability of Naples as one of Florida's premier and upscale destinations? How does such an expensive and time consuming project, with such significant impact on surrounding communities, truly benefit the community in the long run? ........ _ ...I ........._ ---- ...._ I. -I---- ---- 1-1.... ...... 61............�...............« ..... 1. Building an overpass on Immokalee Rd over Livingston Rd would have made total sense and would have been the real solution in this case. Instead you're suggesting one on Livingston Rd with a minimum impact on reducing traffic congestion on Immokalee Rd, if any. On top of that the completion of this project will take 4 years of chaos, during which the existing traffic conditions will just become much worse. I understand the cost of an overpass on Immokalee would be much higher, but at least it will solve your problem. You don't build a 50 million dollars overpass just to eliminate a 5 minute delay at a red light for a couple of hours a day, this isjust ridiculous. 2. This overpass would bejust a partial solution even for traffic going straight on Livingston Rd. The red light for traffic going straight into Immokalee, and I'm referring to those cars crossing Immokalee Rd to 'Seed to Table' and Dunkin Donuts plaza, also to Carlton Lakes Blvd. Actually you'll need at least three lanes on both the SE and NW corners. These cars will be squeezed between the traffic turning right(East) and left(West) on Immokalee Rd, which will prolong their waiting time by reducing the number of lanes crossing Immokalee Rd and as a result reducing the number of cars which can pass through that particular green light interval; 3. This overpass will encourage more traffic on Livingston Rd. Once this project will be completed will be perceived as a local expressway and a substitute to Hwy i75, as a result attracting an increased number of commercial vehicles and semi -tractor trailer trucks; 4. The overpass will increase noise levels, noise that cannot be contained anymore, it will generate vibrations, it will increase car emissions and pollution, it will pose higher safety risks, which will get exacerbated with an increased traffic. Surprisingly your study is not even mentioning these effects or have them quantified. You don't include a noise study, not even an environmental impact study or pollution study, not talking about a real estate property values impact study, all which could have gave the public a real measure of your proposal. You're actually disregarding entirely the impact and implications of this bridge for the surrounding communities and their residents; 5. The impact on the surrounding communities, both during and after completion of this overpass will be tremendous. The property values and desirability of these communities will be seriously affected, discouraging lots of families and retirees from buying and moving to this area. Your overpass will become Edgewater at Carlton an incurable defect and an external obsolesce for these surrounding communities; Lakes Please submit your questions or comments about the Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study in Order Date First Name Last Name Email Cell Phone the text box below. Company 2021-05-17 Nancy Tarullo ndtlbi@gmail.com 9737227500 How will this plan affect Carlton Lakes 2021-05-17 Linda Donaldson donaldsonlinda9l@gmaiLcom 2395955806 2021-OS-17 BOB DRISTE KDRISTE41@GMAIL.COM 16128240899 Overpass is a bad Idea Will create noise air and quality of life pollution Overdevelopment is creating the problem Carlton Lakes does not want its western view destroyed 2021-05-17 James Shields jss4963@gmail.com 631SS37630 I object to this overpass Will the project be taking any of Carlton Lakes property on the northbound part of Livingston? Will the project be taking any of the Oakes property on the northbound part of Livingston and on the souhbound part of Livingston? Will a stoplight be installed at the north entrance to Carlton Lakes to provide a SAFE place to enter and exit the community? Have you fully examined other ideas for adding to the need for better/more east and west roadways? 2021-05-17 Janice Elsesser j.g.elsesser@gmail.com 763-221-1244 Veterans parkway? Vanderbilt Beach Road? Not Applicable 2021-05-17 Jean Paulsen jpincmac@aol.com 973-342-6093 2021-05-17 Ed Samuels ESAMUELS@ATT.NET 2395353362 Resident Carlton Lakes, 2021-05-17 Paul Dewe-Mathews pdewemathews@gmail.com 2395641122 Naples FI 34110 2021-05-17 joyce saunders under]@bc.edu 2021-OS-17 ROBERT STRUTZEL mbs5230@gmaiLcom 3122133466 There seems to be more traffic going E-W on Immokalee, why the bridges on Livingston? I'm not seeing 2021-OS-17 oscar vazquez ovmai190@gmail.com how this would help reduce congestion. 2021-05-17 Carol Wood arolwR@yahoo.com 2392932489 2021-05-17 Anthony Maru anthony.maru@gmaiLcom 203-623-4224 2021-05-17 Barbara Fuller bafullerl947@gmail.com 18044364646 2021-OS-17 Danielle Cates bafullerl947@gmail.com 8044364646 2021-05-17 Sheila Peterson sheila.whitel956@yahoo.com 6122511641 Carlton Lakes 2021-05-17 Chris Aller allerc@bellsouth.net 2021-05-17 Normand Cote ncote@ngcstructural.com 6037675226 NGC Structural LLC 2021-OS-17 Debi Wollenberg dunnfirst@yahoo.com 8473028576 2021-05-18 Glenn Niesen ke4ktz@gmail.com 2021-05-18 Debra Niesen nratchet@onefryshort.org 2021-05-18 Sidney Staples stapless9l@yahoo.com 239404-2861 2021-OS-18 Dan Leaman dannao2@comcast.net 2394040254 None 2021-05-18 Stephen Gordon sigordo@msn.com 8053906366 Will you be putting a stop light at the north end of Carlton Lakes Blvd and Livingston? Edgewater HOA 2021-05-18 Debra Adamski sheba2329@gmaiLcom 2014361399 2021-05-18 Jan Donnell jan.lakeview@gmail.com 2392723234 How will this affect entrance and exit to Carlton Lakes Boulevard South Entrance?. 2021-OS-18 Ann Marie McHugh ammchughfl@gmail.com 8605733190 -1 have concerns regarding the potential adverse impact of exiting traffic from Carlton Lakes Blvd., particularly those that want to make a U turn to go SB on Livingston. This movement, in my opinion, will be more difficult and less safe due to the following: 1. Due to the required relocation of Carlton Lake Blvd. to approximately 200 to 300 feet north of the existing intersection there will be less weaving length available to reach the U turn lane. 2. Under the proposed scheme, exiting Carlton Lakes Blvd. traffic must first merge with a single lane of interchange ramp traffic and then cross the two thru Livingston NB traffic to reach the U turn lane. This will be more difficult than the existing maneuver. 3.Of most concern is that NB Livingston traffic will be free Row thru the interchange. Right now the existing traffic signal which periodically stops traffic entering the intersection, creating gaps for exiting Carlton Lakes Blvd. traffic to weave into the U turn lane relatively easy. However, with Livingston NB going over Immokalee, Livingston NB flow will be more random probably similar to a Poisson distribution. This "random' distribution coupled with the reduced sight distance on Livingston due to the crest vertical curve needed to take Livingston over Immokalee and the probable higher speeds on NB Livingston ( since it will be free flow with no stops) will contribute to a much less safe weaving maneuver for Carlton Lakes traffic. My concluding comment is that the study be expanded to address these concerns and not compromise safety for Carlton Lakes traffic. A possible option to consider is to add a traffic signal at the north entrance to Carlton Lakes to eliminate the need for the weave. 2021-OS-18 thomas bryer tebryer@yahoo.com 7178565744 Tom Bryer Retired Why build the flyover on Livingston when Immokalee has all of the traffic backup and would benefit more 2021-05-18 James Warner jfwarnerco@gmail.com 17193513962 from the flyover? 2021-05-18 Larry Francione Iawrencefrancione@gmaiLcom 4148995506 2021-OS-18 Joann Belmar jbelmar@charter.net 2021-05-18 Elizabeth Girardat Iirardat@gmaiLcom My greatest concern is that traffic moves at least 60 on Livingston which has 45 limit. With the overpass, it will be worse. The intersection of Livingston and Delasol community which is across from the back entrance to Carlton Lakes desperately needs a stoplight now. It will be even more dire if the project takes place. A left turn lane will not be safe either because leaving Carlton Lakes would require crossing 3 lanes 2021-05-18 Julie Chilstrom juliecdts@gmaiLcom 6057690735 of traffic to get to the left turn lane. Stoplight is what is needed. 2021-05-18 Pamela Stracka ppstracka@gmaiLcom Will the changes limit access to the entrance to Carlton Lakes? 2021-05-18 Paul Raffa coolpaul34130@gmail.com 2021-05-19 Lisa OToole otooleli58@gmaiLcom What is the projected impact on Immokalee Road from the three new villages being built in the RSLA 2021-05-19 Linda Strom hellostrom@yahoo.com 239-580-8150 area? 2021-OS-19 Jerry Strom jerryestrom@yahoo.com 239-580-8150 2021-05-19 Joseph Grande gmndejoseph@yahoo.com 4407599377 2021-05-19 Larry Griminger Igriminger6839@comcast.net 3096575750 Carlton Lakes 2021-05-19 Mark Trepanier MTrepanier@AstonGardens.com 2395710734 2021-OS-19 Sandra Campo oats058@outlook.com 4014196438 Sprint Sprint 2021-05-19 Larry Beer Iandlbeer@aol.com 3303217191 2021-05-19 Angela Ciccia angelamciccia@gmail.com 9789878370 Need to learn more about it Self 2021-05-20 Jean Cahill jeancahi117@gmail.com 2014003647 2021-OS-20 Karen De Stefano karendestefano3l2@gmaiLcom 3127351885 2021-05-20 Lori Yorkavitz Iuvlori@zoominternet.net 2021-05-21 Mary Rossi dmrossil@aol.com 3392212504 2021-05-21 Jay Chesslo psujml@gmail.com 6304765602 2021-OS-21 Eugene Nalli Emnll0@comcast.net 2021-05-21 Kristina Schotzinger kristina.carlonlakes@gmaiLcom 330-328-5428 2021-05-21 Cheryl Childress cheric855@aol.com 2021-05-21 Ronald Childress cheric85S@aol.com 2021-05-21 Margaret Sudor masmts@aol.com 4844378844 2021-05-22 Cheryl Pfaus cherylhfl@yahoo.com 2021-OS-24 April Staples aprilstaples@yahoo.com 2395953484 2021-05-24 Rosemary Foreman rforered@aol.com 915-920-0208 2021-OS-24 Peggy Holstine chocolatecow40@aol.com 2695792181 2021-05-24 Clare Cassara ccass821@aol.com 15164591077 2021-OS-24 Lauren Grant Iaurenjl23@aol.com 2021-05-24 michael Campanelli campanelli.mike@verizon.net 9142639956 2021-05-24 Tom Our tsdurham19@gmail.com 2021-05-24 Yvonne Blair ysblair@gmail.com 2021-OS-24 Carol Simpson sac101384@aol.com 9476125694 Order Date First Name Last Name Email Cell Phone 2021-05-24 Carol Simpson sac101384@aol.com 8476125694 2021-05-24 Mary Gignac gignacmary@gmaiLcom 269-861-1971 2021-OS-24 Mary Gig— gignacmary@gmail.com 12698611971 2021-05-24 Dave Dasher davedashe@gmail.com 2021-05-24 Debby Stephens destephens2@gmail.com 2394048524 2021-05-24 Kelly Stephens kellymstephens2@gmail.com 2394048524 2021-05-24 Bill Boodger bill_boodger@msn.com 2394048524 2021-05-24 Cheryl Chegwidden chegwidden3@gmaiLcom 2394SI8209 2021-05-24 larry beer landlbeer@aol.com 2021-05-24 Martin Sullivan rsullyl@aol.com 2392480206 2021-05-24 Bernie Mraz bnmraz526@comcast.net 2021-05-24 Judith T jsabin244@gmail.com 5089427650 2021-05-24 Tim Foley undtpfl4@gmail.com 5165813772 2021-05-24 Jeff Braun ndpang55@gmaiLcom 2676640419 2021-05-24 Joyce Leedom jkleedom@comcast.net 856-912-1720 2021-05-24 GEORGE NOREN gladiatorl72@yahoo.com 6313831928 2021-05-24 Perry Krieger perry@perrvkrieger.com 4168024488 2021-05-25 Bernie Mraz bnmraz526@comcast.net 2021-05-25 James Johnson Rjohnson523@aol.com 4133299722 2021-05-25 Patricia McNair pmcnairconsult@gmail.com 2396414080 2021-05-25 Bob Pawlowski bobpaulap@sbcglobal.net 5866157676 2021-05-25 Laurel Stoltzner Ljstiltz@comcast.net (847) 477-1306 2021-OS-26 Diane Zumc reezunic@aol.com 2021-OS-26 Michelle A ginamichelle58@gmaiLcom 2021-05-26 Gio A gio.andrade007@gmail.com 2021-05-26 anthony vitale nyssba96@aol.com 15166598793 2021-05-26 John Tivenan jrt7744@msn.com 646247-3090 2021-05-26 peter trusevitch ptrusevitch@yahoo.com 12395939754 2021-05-26 Vincent Baiera vbsiera5655@gmail.com 9176171107 2021-05-26 Zach Franklin zachl3franklin@gmail.com 2021-05-26 Ann Marie McHugh ammchughfl@gmail.com 8605733190 2021-05-26 John McHugh bomcg06@gmail.com 3392222198 2021-OS-26 Ofelia Tallon otallon@gmail.com 2395658992 2021-05-27 robert bree rdbree2002@yahoo.com 2021-OS-27 Beth Thompson bt515@hotmaii.com 2246563620 2021-05-27 Aggie Vitale agvit@aol.com 5166598793 2021-05-27 Chris Vitale cvita@slomins.com 5164739139 2021-05-27 AnnMarie McHugh mchughfl@gmail.com 2021-05-27 Virginia Burkley sheril64@comcast.net 9084205495 2021-05-27 Sharon Leonard munchsa@gmail.com 8144020304 2021-OS-27 John Leonard munchsa@gmail.com 8144020304 2021-05-27 James Shields jss4963@gmail.com 6315537630 2021-05-27 Robert Comenato bobcnaples@gmail.com 2021-05-27 Ron Delestowicz rondelS@yahoo.com 7089322731 2021-OS-27 Robin Crudele rcrudele@gmail.com 2394316852 2021-OS-27 Robert Strutzel r.strutzel@att.net 3122133466 2021-05-27 DONALD CIRILLO DON.CIRILLO@NATELECSALES.COM 6317663313 2021-OS-27 JOHN PANAGIDES JPANAGIDES@YAHOO.COM 2021-05-27 Larry Griminger Igriminger6839@comcast.net 3096572665 2021-OS-27 Patricia Canfield pattycanf@gmail.com 2021-05-27 Carol Chowanic cschirr@aol.com 248-760-5617 2021-05-27 Beth Majors bethmajors@aol.com 2021-05-27 Linda Strom hellostrom@yahoo.com 2021-05-27 Jerry Strom hellostrom@yahoo.com 2021-05-27 Steven Kulaga stevekulaga@mac.com 2021-05-19 Cheryl Dromgoole dromgoole@comcast.net 239-287-5104 Please submit your questions or comments about the Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study in the text box below. For Livingston Rd intersection, has Continuous Flow intersection been considered? Carlton Lakes Resident I thought that the purpose of the changes is to reduce some of the extra traffic as a result of all the new residential construction off Immokalee from Logan eastward as people travel westward. A large percentage of the people will be going downtown or north to Bonita Springs, Fort Myers, or the airport or the outlet malls. The most efficient way to do this is to disburse all the traffic on 75 which can handle it. Encouraging traffic to continue west on Immokalee is simply going to make things worse and cause traffic jams at all the lights west of Livingston to US41. Another thing that makes no sense whatsoever is having the overpass on Livingston. That will make the traffic in the intersection much worse -not better. I have no idea what basis there is for any of you conclusions. Please provide actual evidence please. One last item. No matter what you do, and hopefully not building an overpass on Livingston where cars are already driving way to fast it is essential that a traffic light be installed at the entrance to Delasol and the north entrance to Carlton Lakes. Lots of people from both communities are making left turns, many people who don't live in those communities are making u-turns into traffic running at 60-75 MPH. Perry Krieger& Very dangerous. Associates Inc. Will a traffic light be installed for residents of Carlton Lakes to help with access to Livingston? Why would you consider building a bridge over Immokolee on Livingston when the traffic issue is on Immokolee road. You will be devastating the residents of Carlton Lakes. When will it start and complete? How will it affect Carlton Lakes financially? Please show numbers. Will it be an environmental friendly construction? Will it be safe to walk and bike from Carlton Lakes to the North Collier Regional Park? owner Since Carlton lakes is land locked except for egresses on Livingston Rd. how will we get in and out during construction? I am very concerned about the construction disruption as well as the likely depreciation of home values in Carlton lakes due to these projects. What other alternatives are being considered in place of building a "flyover" at Livingston & Immokalee? No Carlton Lakes Carlton Lakes Community Source Type Identity Timestamp Content Attendee Question Carlton Clubhouse (Unverified) 5/27/2021 22:05 have you started yet/ We will begin shortly(Carlton Clubhouse (Unverified) asked Moderator Response Nathan Lunsford (Nathan. Lunsford@jacobs.com) 5/27/2021 22:06 "have you started yet/") Will this deck be sent out to Attendee Question Victor A (Unverified) 5/27/2021 22:12 attendees? The meeting presentation will be posted on the project website.(Victor A (Unverified) asked "Will this deck be sent out Moderator Response Nathan Lunsford (Nathan.Lunsford@jacobs.com) 5/27/2021 22:16 to attendees?") Will this deck be sent out to Attendee Question Victor A (Unverified) 5/27/2021 22:16 attendees? The slides will at least be on the project website. (Victor A (Unverified) asked "Will this deck Moderator Response Nathan Lunsford (Nathan.Lunsford@jacobs.com) 5/27/2021 22:22 be sent out to attendees?") Attendee Question Anonymous (Unverified) 5/27/2021 22:16 Has the event started? yes, in progress now(Has the Moderator Response Carla Mykytiuk (carla.mykytiuk@jacobs.com) 5/27/2021 22:17 event started?) Is it a foregone conclusion that there is going to be an overpass or flyover along Livingston at Immokalee? Or are there other options being discussed to deal Attendee Question Zach (Carlton Lakes Resident) (Unverified) 5/27/2021 22:17 with future congestion? Many options were considered during this study. This will be elaborated later on in the presentation. (Zach (Carlton Lakes Resident) (Unverified) asked "Is it a foregone conclusion that there is going to be an overpass or flyover along Livingston at Immokalee? Or are there other options being discussed to deal Moderator Response Nathan Lunsford (Nathan.Lunsford@jacobs.com) 5/27/2021 22:19 with future congestion?") Attendee Question Anonymous (Unverified) 5/27/2021 22:17 Okay, thank you Is it a foregone conclusion that there is going to be an overpass or flyover along Livingston at Immokalee? Or are there other options being discussed to deal Attendee Question Zach (Carlton Lakes Resident) (Unverified) 5/27/2021 22:20 with future congestion? 1 Source Type Identity Moderator Response Attendee Question Attendee Question Attendee Question Nathan Lunsford (Nathan.Lunsford@jacobs.com) This will be an eyesore for us residents Am I to beleive that when I look out my lanai I will see a (Unverified) This will be an eyesore for us residents Am I to beleive that when I look out my lanai I will see a (Unverified) This will be an eyesore for us residents Am I to beleive that when I look out my lanai I will see a (Unverified) Moderator Response Nathan Lunsford (Nathan.Lunsford@jacobs.com) Attendee Question Anonymous (Unverified) This will be an eyesore for us residents Am I to beleive that when I look out my lanai I will see a Attendee Question (Unverified) Attendee Question Anonymous (Unverified) Moderator Response Nathan Lunsford (Nathan.Lunsford@jacobs.com) Timestamp Content This question will be addressed in the presentation under the alternatives analysis slide.(Zach (Carlton Lakes Resident) (Unverified) asked "Is it a foregone conclusion that there is going to be an overpass or flyover along Livingston at Immokalee? Or are there other options being discussed to deal 5/27/2021 22:22 with future congestion?") this will be an eyesore to 5/27/2021 22:26 residents 5/27/2021 22:26 overpass 5/27/2021 22:27 overpass The sightlines will be addressed later in this presentation(This will be an eyesore for us residents Am I to beleive that when I look out my lanai I will see a 5/27/2021 22:27 (Unverified) asked "overpass") If traffic is going to increase approximate 67% won't Livingston need a traffic light at 5/27/2021 22:27 the Carlton Lakes & Del Sol? we are not Miami. a moratorium on building should be in place. Naples is getting 5/27/202122:28 rediculous If traffic is going to increase approximate 67% won't Livingston need a traffic light at 5/27/2021 22:30 the Carlton Lakes & Del Sol? As shown by the 2020 Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis, a signal is not warranted at this location.(If traffic is going to increase approximate 67% won't Livingston need a traffic light at 5/27/2021 22:30 the Carlton Lakes & Del Sol?) N Source Type Identity Timestamp Content Carlton Lakes can re -do the traffic analysis after the improvements to see if there is any change(If traffic is going to increase approximate 67%won't Livingston need a traffic light at Moderator Response Nathan Lunsford (Nathan.Lunsford@jacobs.com) 5/27/2021 22:34 the Carlton Lakes & Del Sol?) Comment: the Golden Gate flyover works well because there Attendee Question Anonymous (Unverified) 5/27/2021 22:30 is NO ONE living underneath it what happens when the 3 new developments north of Carlton HAVE YOU STARTED? WE HEAR NOTHING Lakes are finished and traffic is Attendee Question (Unverified) 5/27/2021 22:30 worse? HAVE YOU STARTED? WE HEAR NOTHING and Veterans Pkwy is finished Attendee Question (Unverified) 5/27/2021 22:31 and more traffic is there The present speaker didn't answer the question asked, which was about the E/W Attendee Question Zach (Carlton Lakes Resident) (Unverified) 5/27/2021 22:31 congestion. The present speaker didn't answer the question asked, which was about the E/W Attendee Question Zach (Carlton Lakes Resident) (Unverified) 5/27/2021 22:32 congestion. The E/W congestion was taken into consideration when following the FDOT ICE process. As you can see on screen, the N/S bridge is more effective when looking at the V/C ratio versus a E/W bridge.(Zach (Carlton Lakes Resident) (Unverified) asked "The present speaker didn't answer the question asked, which was about Moderator Response Nathan Lunsford (Nathan.Lunsford@jacobs.com) 5/27/2021 22:33 the E/W congestion.") Lorraine - CL can re -do the traffic It's Lorraine - tell Carla at the end to come back to analysis after the improvements Attendee Question the Traffic Signal Question - (Unverified) 5/27/2021 22:33 to see if there is any change Will do. (It's Lorraine - tell Carla at the end to come back to the Traffic Signal Question - (Unverified) asked "Lorraine - CL can re -do the traffic analysis after the improvements to see if there Moderator Response Colleen Ross (Colleen. Ross@jacobs.com) 5/27/2021 22:34 is any change") 3 Source Type Identity Attendee Question Anonymous (Unverified) Attendee Question Anonymous (Unverified) Attendee Question Anonymous (Unverified) Timestamp Content Your traffic congestion is on Immokalee not on Livingston's. This is not going to reduce ytraffic volume on Immokalee, in addition is going to increase the delays on Livingston for traffic. going around the bridge by reducing the number of lanes. Also you'll need additional signaling at these communities entrances to allow cross traffic safety passage practically bringing Livingston traffic to a full stop an half a mile later. Also you'll improve traffic only one level from F to E! How do you 5/27/2021 22:35 justify all these? will we still be able to get out of 5/27/2021 22:37 CL and turn south? Your traffic congestion is on Immokalee not on Livingston's. This is not going to reduce ytraffic volume on Immokalee, in addition is going to increase the delays on Livingston for traffic. going around the bridge by reducing the number of lanes. Also you'll need additional signaling at these communities entrances to allow cross traffic safety passage practically bringing Livingston traffic to a full stop an half a mile later. Also you'll improve traffic only one level from F to E! How do you 5/27/2021 22:37 justify all these? 4 Source Type Identity Moderator Response Nathan Lunsford (Nathan.Lunsford@jacobs.com) Moderator Response Felicia Kirby (Felicia.Kirby2@jacobs.com) Attendee Question Anonymous (Unverified) Moderator Response Nathan Lunsford (Nathan.Lunsford@jacobs.com) Timestamp Content LOS E or better is an acceptable LOS to Collier County.(Your traffic congestion is on Immokalee not on Livingston's. This is not going to reduce ytraffic volume on Immokalee, in addition is going to increase the delays on Livingston for traffic. going around the bridge by reducing the number of lanes. Also you'll need additional signaling at these communities entrances to allow cross traffic safety passage practically bringing Livingston traffic to a full stop an half a mile later. Also you'll improve traffic only one level from F to E! How 5/27/2021 22:38 do you justify all these? ) The improvements will reduce the average overall intersection delay in 2040 by approximately 7 minutes (Your traffic congestion is on Immokalee not on Livingston's. This is not going to reduce ytraffic volume on Immokalee, in addition is going to increase the delays on Livingston for traffic. going around the bridge by reducing the number of lanes. Also you'll need additional signaling at these communities entrances to allow cross traffic safety passage practically bringing Livingston traffic to a full stop an half a mile later. Also you'll improve traffic only one level from F to E! How 5/27/2021 22:40 do you justify all these? ) will we still be able to get out of 5/27/2021 22:38 CL and turn south? This was addressed in the presentation with the first question. For the Southern Carlton Lakes exit, you will need to head north and U-turn. (will we still be able to get out of CL 5/27/2021 22:39 and turn south?) 5 Source Type Identity Timestamp Content FDOT its evaluating a new interchange at Vanderbilt Rd and 175 which will reduce traffic volume on Immokalee and Pineridge Rd, which will practically nullifies your proposal. Attendee Question Anonymous (Unverified) 5/27/2021 22:39 How do you respond to that? The stop and go is less of a concern, most of cars have a engine disconnect or are electric. Pollution is increasing when cars would be accelerate uphill and Attendee Question Anonymous (Unverified) 5/27/2021 22:42 breaking downhill! FDOT its evaluating a new interchange at Vanderbilt Rd and 175 which will reduce traffic volume on Immokalee and Pineridge Rd, which will practically nullifies your proposal. Attendee Question Anonymous (Unverified) 5/27/2021 22:42 How do you respond to that? We are in coordination with FDOT's Study and their preliminary analysis indicates this intersection will still need to be improved even if an additional interchange is introduced at Vanderbilt 1-75(FDOT its evaluating a new interchange at Vanderbilt Rd and 175 which will reduce traffic volume on Immokalee and Pineridge Rd, which will practically nullifies your proposal. How do you Moderator Response Nathan Lunsford (Nathan.Lunsford@jacobs.com) 5/27/2021 22:42 respond to that?) Will westbound Immokalee still be able to U-turn at Livingston? They have the right-of-way over the Livingston right turn folks but this is always a problem and is Attendee Question Larry Beer (Unverified) 5/27/2021 22:43 dangerous. A U-turn at Immokalee Road will be evaluated during design(Larry Beer (Unverified) asked "Will westbound Immokalee still be able to U-turn at Livingston? They have the right-of-way over the Livingston right turn folks but this is always a problem and is Moderator Response Felicia Kirby (Felicia.Kirby2@jacobs.com) 5/27/2021 22:45 dangerous.") R Source Type Identity Timestamp Content no, the diverging diamond we've seen in other states and used Attendee Question Anonymous (Unverified) 5/27/2021 22:44 them -- they're very confusing Why hasn't the bridge height and aesthetics take into consideration tall semi -trucks on Attendee Question Renate (Unverified) 5/27/2021 22:45 top of the bridge? Motorcycles and semis noise will increase as a result of acceleration and deceleration„ how you'll insulate this increased Attendee Question Anonymous (Unverified) 5/27/2021 22:45 noise? Will westbound Immokalee still be able to U-turn at Livingston? They have the right-of-way over the Livingston right turn folks but this is always a problem and is Attendee Question Larry Beer (Unverified) 5/27/2021 22:46 dangerous. A U-turn at Immokalee Road will be evaluated during design(Larry Beer (Unverified) asked "Will westbound Immokalee still be able to U-turn at Livingston? They have the right-of-way over the Livingston right turn folks but this is always a problem and is Moderator Response Nathan Lunsford (Nathan.Lunsford@jacobs.com) 5/27/2021 22:52 dangerous.") When and how long will the primary entrance to Carlton Lakes be inaccessible due to Attendee Question Anonymous (Unverified) 5/27/2021 22:47 construction? How will you mitigate the traffic during 4 years of construction, which will create extended Attendee Question Anonymous (Unverified) 5/27/2021 22:47 delays and frustration? Access during construction will be discussed later in the presentation (How will you mitigate the traffic during 4 years of construction, which will create extended delays and Moderator Response Felicia Kirby (Felicia.Kirby2@jacobs.com) 5/27/2021 22:50 frustration?) Am I misunderstanding that when we leave Carlton Lake on Carlton Lake Blvd. we will be seeing the bottom of the bridge Attendee Question Anonymous (Unverified) 5/27/2021 22:48 structure? Yikes if that is correct Why hasn't the bridge height and aesthetics take into consideration tall semi -trucks on Attendee Question Renate (Unverified) 5/27/2021 22:48 top of the bridge? 7 Source Type Identity Timestamp Content All bridges will be designed and constructed to FDOT standards.(Renate (Unverified) asked "Why hasn't the bridge height and aesthetics take into consideration tall semi -trucks on Moderator Response Nathan Lunsford (Nathan.Lunsford@jacobs.com) 5/27/2021 22:48 top of the bridge?") Aesthetic considerations are being considered during this study and will continue to be considered during the design. Public outreach will continue during design to gain input on aesthetic considerations. (Renate (Unverified) asked "Why hasn't the bridge height and aesthetics take into consideration tall semi - Moderator Response Colleen Ross (Colleen. Ross@jacobs.com) 5/27/2021 22:51 trucks on top of the bridge?") Golden Gate Bridge cost $38,000,000 in 2007, how much do you think will be this one by Attendee Question Anonymous (Unverified) 5/27/2021 22:51 2031? Motorcycles and semis noise will increase as a result of acceleration and deceleration„ how you'll insulate this increased Attendee Question Anonymous (Unverified) 5/27/2021 22:51 noise? A noise study will be performed during the Design Phase. No significant changes in noise are anticipated since the facility is already a 6-lane roadway. (Motorcycles and semis noise will increase as a result of acceleration and deceleration„ how you'll insulate this increased Moderator Response Felicia Kirby (Felicia.Kirby2@jacobs.com) 5/27/2021 22:52 noise?) Am I misunderstanding that when we leave Carlton Lake on Carlton Lake Blvd. we will be seeing the bottom of the bridge Attendee Question Anonymous (Unverified) 5/27/2021 22:52 structure? Yikes if that is correct The bottom of the bridge may be visible when exiting the neighborhood. Aesthetic treatments of the bridge such as landscaping will be done to minimize visual impacts.(Am I misunderstanding that when we leave Carlton Lake on Carlton Lake Blvd. we will be seeing the bottom of the bridge structure? Moderator Response Colleen Ross (Colleen. Ross@jacobs.com) 5/27/2021 22:57 Yikes if that is correct) 8 Source Type Identity Timestamp Content When and how long will the primary entrance to Carlton Lakes be inaccessible due to Attendee Question Anonymous (Unverified) 5/27/2021 22:53 construction? The entrance to Carlton Lakes will be maintained during construction. (When and how long will the primary entrance to Carlton Lakes be inaccessible due Moderator Response Colleen Ross (Colleen. Ross@jacobs.com) 5/27/2021 22:55 to construction?) how likely is the Board to approve the current design? do they frequently change a Attendee Question Anonymous (Unverified) 5/27/2021 22:55 proposed design? Golden Gate Bridge cost $38,000,000 in 2007, how much do you think will be this one by Attendee Question Anonymous (Unverified) 5/27/2021 22:55 2031? Once design is completed, we will have cost estimates completed. Please note that Golden Gate Bridge is a 6-lane overpass, where this study recommends a 4-lane overpass.(Golden Gate Bridge cost $38,000,000 in 2007, how much do you think will be this Moderator Response Nathan Lunsford (Nathan.Lunsford@jacobs.com) 5/27/2021 22:57 one by 2031?) How much will be the waiting time on Livingston Rd for the traffic going North on ground level to Seed to Table and Carlton Attendee Question Anonymous (Unverified) 5/27/2021 22:56 Lakes! The approximate delay projected for 2040 for the northbound at -grade through movement is 3-4 minutes(How much will be the waiting time on Livingston Rd for the traffic going North on ground level to Seed to Moderator Response Felicia Kirby (Felicia.Kirby2@jacobs.com) 5/27/2021 23:05 Table and Carlton Lakes!) I would like to go over again the discussion about the grade and where exactly, in relation to Carlton Lakes Blvd and the end of Cobble Creek Court, where the Attendee Question Renate (Unverified) 5/27/2021 22:58 grade will start to increase? how likely is the Board to approve the current design? do they frequently change a Attendee Question Anonymous (Unverified) 5/27/2021 22:59 proposed design? pi Source Type Identity Moderator Response Nathan Lunsford (Nathan.Lunsford@jacobs.com) Attendee Question Anonymous (Unverified) Attendee Question Anonymous (Unverified) Attendee Question Anonymous (Unverified) Moderator Response Colleen Ross (Colleen.Ross@jacobs.com) Attendee Question Renate (Unverified) Attendee Question Anonymous (Unverified) Attendee Question Anonymous (Unverified) Attendee Question Zach (Carlton Lakes Resident) (Unverified) Moderator Response Nathan Lunsford (Nathan.Lunsford@jacobs.com) Timestamp Content This project is conceptual. The next phase is to design the project. If approved, this will be forwarded to the design team(how likely is the Board to approve the current design? do they frequently change a 5/27/2021 23:03 proposed design?) What about the 3 new developments now being built north of Carlton Lakes on Livingston? How will we be able 5/27/2021 22:59 to exit CL and head south??? (Aren't the taxpayers going to pay for this?! Shouldn't they 5/27/2021 23:02 have the last word? What about our quiet 5/27/2021 23:02 enjoyment? A noise study will be performed during the design phase of the project. (What about our quiet 5/27/2021 23:05 enjoyment?) I would like to go over again the discussion about the grade and where exactly, in relation to Carlton Lakes Blvd and the end of Cobble Creek Court, where the 5/27/2021 23:03 grade will start to increase? What about our quiet 5/27/2021 23:05 enjoyment? What about the 3 new developments now being built north of Carlton Lakes on Livingston? How will we be able 5/27/2021 23:05 to exit CL and head south??? Again, is the flyover a foregone conclusion or are there 5/27/2021 23:08 alternatives being considered? The E/W congestion was taken into consideration when following the FDOT ICE process. As you can see on screen, the N/S bridge is more effective when looking at the V/C ratio versus a E/W bridge.(Zach (Carlton Lakes Resident) (Unverified) asked "Again, is the flyover a foregone conclusion or are there alternatives being 5/27/2021 23:08 considered?") 10 Source Type Identity Moderator Response Nathan Lunsford (Nathan.Lunsford@jacobs.com) Attendee Response Zach (Carlton Lakes Resident) (Unverified) Moderator Response Nathan Lunsford (Nathan.Lunsford@jacobs.com) Attendee Response Zach (Carlton Lakes Resident) (Unverified) Attendee Question Randy (Unverified) Moderator Response Nathan Lunsford (Nathan.Lunsford@jacobs.com) Attendee Question Renate (Unverified) Attendee Question Anonymous (Unverified) Timestamp Content Sorry, the slide changed. The chart is on slide 19. The slides will be made available online.(Zach (Carlton Lakes Resident) (Unverified) asked "Again, is the flyover a foregone conclusion or are there alternatives being 5/27/2021 23:09 considered?") So that's a yes, it's going to be a flyover unless the County Board of Commissioners doesn't approve it?(Zach (Carlton Lakes Resident) (Unverified) asked "Again, is the flyover a foregone conclusion or are there 5/27/2021 23:10 alternatives being considered?") The phase of this project is conceptual. The next phase is to design the project. If approved by the BCC, this will be forwarded to the design team.(Zach (Carlton Lakes Resident) (Unverified) asked "Again, is the flyover a foregone conclusion or are there 5/27/2021 23:12 alternatives being considered?") Understood. Thank you.(Zach (Carlton Lakes Resident) (Unverified) asked "Again, is the flyover a foregone conclusion or are there alternatives being 5/27/2021 23:13 considered?") Will there be a traffic light at the 5/27/2021 23:08 North enterance? As shown by the 2020 Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis, a signal is not warranted at this location. Carlton Lakes can re -do the traffic analysis after the improvements to see if there is any change(Randy (Unverified) asked "Will there be a traffic light 5/27/2021 23:10 at the North enterance?") How do we get on the Project 5/27/2021 23:09 Distribution list? If approved, when will it start 5/27/2021 23:09 and when will it be completed? 11 Source Type Identity Timestamp Content These 3 new developments on Livingston to the north of CL will add more traffic heading south. How will we be able to exit CL if there is no traffic light? These developments will be lived in by the next year, so shouldn't you be considering how to aid us in Attendee Question Anonymous (Unverified) 5/27/2021 23:09 your plans? This Project will not in any way alleviate the East West Traffic on Attendee Question Anonymous (Unverified) 5/27/2021 23:10 Immokalee Rd. perry what about a light at north entrance what about a light at the north Attendee Question (Unverified) 5/27/2021 23:10 entrance If approved, when will it start Attendee Question Anonymous (Unverified) 5/27/2021 23:10 and when will it be completed? Between 2026-2030.(If approved, when will it start and Moderator Response Nathan Lunsford (Nathan.Lunsford@jacobs.com) 5/27/2021 23:10 when will it be completed?) If you move the U-turn further North coming from the South Entrance of Carlton Lakes, will this effect the cars exiting the Attendee Question Anonymous (Unverified) 5/27/2021 23:10 North entrance? This will be assessed during design.(If you move the U-turn further North coming from the South Entrance of Carlton Lakes, will this effect the cars exiting the Moderator Response Nathan Lunsford (Nathan.Lunsford@jacobs.com) 5/27/2021 23:14 North entrance?) Why not responding to al these questions we've sent on the last 30 minutes, you didn't answer one single question from our Attendee Question W (Unverified) 5/27/2021 23:10 group? what about the height of all these cars and trucks running on Attendee Question W (Unverified) 5/27/2021 23:11 top of this bridge? All bridge designs will meet FDOT design standards.(W (Unverified) asked "what about the height of all these cars and trucks running on top of this Moderator Response Nathan Lunsford (Nathan.Lunsford@jacobs.com) 5/27/2021 23:14 bridge?") How do we get on the Project Attendee Question Renate (Unverified) 5/27/2021 23:11 Distribution list? Attendee Question W (Unverified) 5/27/2021 23:11 No you didn't!!! Shame! How will a vehicle enter the apartment complex south of Immokalee while traveling south on Livingston with the new Attendee Question Anonymous (Unverified) 5/27/2021 23:11 overpass? 12 Source Type Identity Timestamp Content But there will be a change with the 3 new developments - much added traffic, making it even harder than it is now to head Attendee Question Anonymous (Unverified) 5/27/2021 23:12 south from the north entrance As shown by the 2020 Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis, a signal is not warranted at this location. Carlton Lakes can re -do the traffic analysis after the improvements to see if there is any change(But there will be a change with the 3 new developments - much added traffic, making it even harder than it is now to head south from Moderator Response Nathan Lunsford (Nathan.Lunsford@jacobs.com) 5/27/2021 23:15 the north entrance) Why not responding to al these questions we've sent on the last 30 minutes, you didn't answer one single question from our Attendee Question W (Unverified) 5/27/2021 23:13 group? While the construction won't impact the North entrance of CL, the lack of a stop light means the traffic will be moving faster. It will be difficult to even turn right from the north entrance. Was this considered in the traffic light Attendee Question Anonymous (Unverified) 5/27/2021 23:13 study? new traffic warrant would be affected by the 3 new Attendee Question Anonymous (Unverified) 5/27/2021 23:16 developments to the north As shown by the 2020 Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis, a signal is not warranted at this location. Carlton Lakes can re -do the traffic analysis after the improvements to see if there is any change(new traffic warrant would be affected by the 3 new Moderator Response Nathan Lunsford (Nathan.Lunsford@jacobs.com) 5/27/2021 23:16 developments to the north) Are these Villages going to be Attendee Question Anonymous (Unverified) 5/27/2021 23:16 like the one in central Fl.? Are these Villages going to be Attendee Question Anonymous (Unverified) 5/27/2021 23:17 like the one in central FI.? But how about in 2022, when about 300 nrew residents move Attendee Question Anonymous (Unverified) 5/27/2021 23:18 in? Attendee Question Anonymous (Unverified) 5/27/2021 23:19 Won' Attendee Question Anonymous (Unverified) 5/27/2021 23:19 that be at least 600 more cars? 13 Dimi'm�ik'a�lte Road Conrji.,dor Congestion Studym&-- ;r . mmm-- -C; ip r .,-:fton Lakes Public Involvement Question and Answer Session , -Allm May 27, 2021 Agenda • Introductions • How to Provide Input • Brief Project Presentation • Received Comments • G&A • Final. Remarks • Adjourn Introductions - Project Team Carla Mykytiuk, MPA Planner/Jacobs Lorraine Lantz, AICP Principal Planner/ Collier County Bill Gramer, PE AICP Project Manager/ Jacobs Nathan Lunsford, El Project Engineer/ Jacobs Felicia Kirby, El Project Engineer/ Jacobs 3 Public Involvement to Date • Project Website created at the kick-off of the study in 2019 and updated periodically • Video Presentation and Online Survey posted March 16, 2021 -Received 639 responses via survey -Received 34 written comments and questions to date (via email) -Survey remains open until June 11, 2021 • District 3 Town Hall Meeting hosted by Commissioner Burt Saunders presented study results on March 25, 2021 • Carlton Lakes HOA Meeting April 30, 2021 3 Months of Public Involvement for Study Recommendations Colfier County About your comments and questions All written comments and questions are part of the Public Record and Project Record. This meeting is being recorded. • For technical issues, we recommend leaving the meeting and rejoining the event by clicking the invite link. This presentation works best in the Teams Desktop or Mobile App or the Google Chrome Browser. Comments and Questions Live Event Q&A Type in Question box on TeamsLive Control Panel After the Live Event Please submit your Survey comments and questions by June 11, 2021 Send an email to Lorraine.Lantz(a-)-Collie rCountyFL.gov Call 239-252-5779 • Link to Project Website with Video Presentation and Survey http://coLLiercountyfL.govZpLanningstudies • Online Survey Link https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/338CB6M 2 Live Event G&A — Ask aquestion or submit a comment "erd Q&A ;:eaturen My que=-. is Anonymous (You) - _ LVjll our entrance be affected' — Rerly Anonymous (You) 1 How v"11 these changes impact the north errtrance/E) it to Carlton Lakes? F Reply Your name (optianal) 7 Ask a question Project Purpose, Needs and Goals `A �'� � �' eH •., .. B �: C D F F C, � H�"° �W M-1 I ,ti - ., o Kim ■� �. � .i4 , .SI N Project To analyze the existing and future traffic conditions along the Immokalee Rd. corridor Project Need: The current traffic are approaching the capacity of the existing roadway. Based on anticipated traffic growth, the corridor operations will experience severe delays by 2040 if no improvements are made. ➢ The 2030 LRTP was adopted in 2006 and included the need for an Intersection /Grade Separated Overpass at the intersection of Immokalee Rd./Livingston Rd. ➢ The 2045 LRTP was adopted in December 2020 and included this project as a Cost Feasible project. Project Goal: To model and project future traffic volumes and level of service (LOS) for both a 5-year (2025) and 20-year (2040) period and to identify corridor improvements that will accommodate future growth. Project Limits ■ The project limits for the Immokalee Rd. study are from Livingston Rd. to Logan Blvd. ■ There are 9 intersections within this study, ■ Livingston Rd. ■ Juliet Blvd./Strand Blvd. ■ Southbound On/Off Ramps 1-75 ■ Northbound On/Off Ramps 1-75 ■ Northbrooke Dr./Tarpon Bay Blvd. ■ Oakes Blvd. ■ Valewood Dr. ■ Executive Dr. ■ Logan Blvd. ■ Improvements will be required along the entire corridor for it to operate efficiently Comment Acknowledgment Comments and questions were received by 27 different registrants. Comments received were related to: • Safety (Speed, Sight Distance/Merging, Traffic Volumes) • Access Management (Ingress/Egress, Traffic signals) • Impacts (Environmental, Noise, Aesthetics) • Timeline Colfier County Questions and Answers Q • Entrances/Access Management Questions: How will these changes impact the north and south entrance/exit to Carlton Lakes? C;Q le,r County Before 4� i an► .. R r �. �+ r a R R,, After N. U -Turn .16 m n 12 Colirler County Questions and Answers u 3 Co Ter County Questions and Answers • Entrances/Access Management Livingston Road Preliminary Typical Sections North of Immokalee Road South of Immokalee Road - - _ r" ftbihw, - n 0 Co Ter County Questions and Answers Q • Entrances/Access Management Question: Are we guaranteed a north bound lane through the intersection to permit access to the south entrance to Carlton Lakes? Answer: The proposed layout is conceptual, but the northbound at -grade through lane is recommended in this study to accommodate access. Though we are still in a conceptual layout, that recommendation will be the basis as design moves forward. COTIrler County Questions and Answers Q • Traffic Signal at North Carlton Lakes Entrance Questions: Will you be putting a stop light at the north end of Carlton Livings^M' Answer The trafi Lakes Blvd and 3 CQ ler County Questions and Answers • Traffic/Congestion Question: How will putting an overpass on Livingston help Immokalee Road congestion? Answer: Redistribution of green time Standard Signal Movements j 4 More Green 1 Mr f Time to Other y Movements � r *1r CQ ler County Questions and Answers Q • Alternatives Analysis Questions: Has the study worked to explore alternatives to putting in an overpass? There seems to be more traffic going E-W on Immokalee, why the bridges on Livingston? Are there any other intersection alternatives that can be constructed besides the overpass? COTIrler County Questions and Answers • Alternatives Analysis Answer: Conventional and Innovative alternatives were analyzed. The East/West overpass (bridge Immokalee Rd) will not provide the same capacity as a North/South (bridge Livingston Rd) facility. The evaluation was ranked significantly lower. The North -South Overpass provides the most efficient and effective solution for 2040. The FDOT has reviewed the data and concurred that at -grade conventional improvements would not alleviate the problem. AM Peak PM Peak Control Strategy • • Overall IReason Strategy was 5 not Advanced 1.02 1 1.52 3 1.69 4 1.74 5 1.74 6 1.81 7 1.81 8 1.86 9 2.23 10 1.18 1.33 1.38 1.51 1.49 1.40 1.40 1.78 1.89 2 Not enough right-of- way (ROW) 3 Does not support 2040 volumes 4 Not enough right-of- way (ROW) 8 Does not support 2040 volumes 7 Does not support 2040 volumes 5 Not enough right-of- way (ROW) 6 Not cost-efficient due to transmission lines 9 Not enough right-of- way (ROW) 10 Not enough right-of- way (ROW) 19 CQ -rer County Questions and Answers • Traffic/Congestion Questions: Are there any other alternatives to alleviate traffic at this intersection? Answer: • The FDOT's Southwest Connect 1-75 South Corridor Study • Can be found at this Li n k: nttDs://www.swf li nterstates. com/i 75-south-corridor/ �q J 75 CO IM --ome Projects Get Involved News & Notifications Contact Us Q n © d o JUNEti PUBLIC OUTREACH 08.1 2021 MEETING f� =� LEARN MORE 20 Co ler County Questions and Answers • Traffic/Congestion Questions: Have you fully examined other ideas for adding to the need for better/more east and west roadways? ur,w .ale �R Fw. MN0 4LEER EJ, M:l�r Ro.a...Iv •r F•b one.a] . j Reese Irn�dee Rd CeNenm = I - Answer: • Veterans Parkway being extended • Vanderbilt Beach Road is in progress for expansion and extension • Refer to 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan on Collier MPOIs website .GIE oP 'u.ti� POvr[c�n Fr Mm .T. _ ( a•rwcts. F,' Mr [cl R ]O10.1P1i a enbrlaapraana.nl -- In - eo r rc.n rm a]v .. EL'F:: karca In2rn•am .. .. KVI,YD RT RE Vwfer+r v Fnawr Lek+ln F� . tinege[n'tY S r� c •ee ripe p�N'«rvlSM YnM.eIBWRe 6A pG I BeSnrel �,5r .-FTte ' � �z �lYlDEM OCA=III H Nw::�I IBC Fx'. AxvSV III'M Q � fOaYiie.GS*�+'F]t Fvyai iaae.n,,m�� vxai1°`I Ermxam, x csr, am':n wa. ai.�.rarwRsc..q Li R RlE \I-, Re ab oneenvixel;e ..RV _ F]5 q.oen FYFp187i1i n� R fame ll i iiiii uJ�a.ow.PF a. csrmr Pael arre.I, iltih f ■l1f' "ff"Rwa@Vmf ^, pig rwwnwsm wWAE F^'Nle -' e�Qadaa nor-:,: - T!Fror.'Frsm, n.+ :.c axfienl �I µWll .a.mFmF :. RXRIEelWQ ROW 1e•]iie r oxRo ,.- .... � � n..E�,[anpyaeem N:a; 4'�waFB.F��HM •� .. ... •. ..' �de� csr en Forn Er]s I :0?, Hid Lmtral i[Iu 4•! y �. gIR�VnN.rnyl _ _ } 1pr FmpC' pk�n 2WB f �L 1Ti tlnre^[y •n wyert arm VS�Eax@F� ._ �� W 6• ,VOeE Ong _ Prue 5uee irnenQ Fer b . e�x�e,rci oeltr�'1•aYMi I r»meneeoenr.Tn' iw �o+e � ■ " PROJECTED COLLIER COUNTY DEFICAEAWROA ` FY 2019 - FY 2029 %�...a..... a.. ..rar ..a . a.. Colfier County Questions and Answers Q • Impacts Questions: What are impacts to Environmental, Aesthetics, and Noise? Answer: • Environmental benefit by reducing congestion will reduce air pollution, fuel consumption and emissions. • The interchange will be designed and landscaped to be aesthetically pleasing. An example of an existing overpass is at Golden Gate Parkway and Airport -Pulling Road. • A noise study will be performed during the Design Phase. No significant changes in noise is anticipated since the facility is already a 6-lane roadway. 22 Co ler County 1 � • A M Bridge Height= at•grade ; Tree Line Height= }2d' BrJdge Height= 3.2' Max ; Tree Line Height=>24' � - Bridge Height=9.5' Max; Tree U Haight=�,20' Bridge Height='E5.V Max ; Tree Line Height:>20' Bridge Height = 22.5' Max ; Building Height. 30.5.50.5' ; Tree Line Height= }20, 1 ' Bridge Height= 2&15' Mm ; Tree Line height —20' 1- i, Bridge Height SIX Max ; Tree Una Height=>sU' �� • � u � . Bridge Height = 35' Max ; Tree Line Height = r20' T. - CARLTON LAKES SIGHT LINE EXHIBIT Proposed Conceptual Legend - - - -- - Sight lure Angfe Barcc. � T -�- Badge kerpp�i Tree HrJgPr � r A treeifrre freight of 16' would block sight line- - —9 A treeiine height of 20.5' would block sight lick # Building height >} bridge height. ti C# 26I • v Bridge Neigh[ TNCOgrrT r A treeline height of 9.5' would black sight fare. of AA # AL # A* ��.F 71' .1 .t 10r - — YikYS " Questions and Answers • Impacts Questions: Will the county commit to planting additional trees between the Carlton Lakes Livingston Wall/preserve and the roadway? Answer: There is significant existing vegetation between Livingston Road and Carlton Lakes. However, during design, the need for additional landscaping will be evaluated to minimize visual gaps in the existing vegetated buffer. Colfier County Questions and Answers • Impacts Questions: How does such an expensive and time-consuming project truly benefit the community in the long run? Answer: • The community benefits from the overpass by decreased delays and traffic congestion along the corridor. • Without the improvements delays at the intersection can reach over 13 minutes by 2040. • Everyone benefits from the reduced delays, but it is also critical to improve access for emergency responders including fire departments, medical services and law enforcement. 25 Colfier County Questions and Answers • Timeline and Construction Questions: When will it start and complete? Answer: The project is included in the long-range plan as cost feasible for design and construction is scheduled to occur as identified in LRTP as: • Livingston Road and Immokalee Road Intersection between 2026-2030 • 1-75/Immokalee Road Interchange between 2026-2030 (in coordination with FDOT) • Immokalee Road and Logan Boulevard Intersection between 2031-4045 • The intersection at Immokalee Road and Northbrooke Drive/Tarpon Bay Boulevard is funded for construction in the Collier County Capital Improvement Plan in Fiscal Year 2021 /2022. Construction is anticipated to take between 18 and 24 months. 26 CQ -rer County Questions and Answers • Impacts Questions: What is the projected impact on Immokalee Road from the three new villages being built in the RSLA area? Answer: • The traffic data from the MOT District 1 Traffic Model included the three RLSA (Rural Land Stewardship Areas) villages on Immokalee Rd along with the rest of future growth within Collier County. • The impacts from the villages are included in the evaluation, however the intersection today is experiencing significant congestion and delays and will require improvements regardless of if/when the planned villages are constructed. 27 Colfier County Questions and Answers • Impacts Questions: Will the project be taking any of Carlton Lakes property on the northbound part of Livingston? Will the project be taking any of the Oakes property on the northbound part of Livingston and on the southbound part of Livingston? Answer: • No, the project will be constructed within the existing County right-of-way. • No right-of-way acquisition will be required. Colfier County Questions and Answers • Timeline and Construction Questions: Will it be safe to walk and bike from Carlton Lakes to the North Collier Regional Park? Since Carlton Lakes is land locked except for egresses on Livingston Rd. how will we get in and out during construction? Answer: Access for pedestrian and vehicular traffic to/from Carlton Lakes will be maintained during construction. COTIrler County Questions and Answers • Timeline and Construction Questions: How will it affect Carlton Lakes financially? Answer: • The reduction of congestion at the intersection and within the surrounding roadway network will be an overall benefit to the adjacent communities. • Carlton Lakes is not financially responsible for any of the proposed improvements the County is considering within the existing right-of-way. • Ingress/egress locations at Carlton Lakes are not being eliminated. • The County is not making any improvements to affect the internal roadway/facilities or the Carlton Lakes north and south access points. 30 Colfier County Next Steps • The Study including the recommendations for the Livingston Rd/Immokalee Rd Intersection will be presented to the Board of County Commissioner for review, comment and approval. • The date for that meeting has not been determined but will be posted on the Project Website located at: http://coLLiercountyfL.Q�pLanningstudies • Notification will be provided to those on the Project distribution list. For additional information I Lorraine.Lantz@colliercountyfl.gov °` regarding this study, please contact Lorraine Lantz, AICP at: 239.252.5779 L Thank you for participating Lorraine.Lantz F- 239.252.5779 CollierCountyFL.gov Meeting Summary This is a meeting summary of the Coffee with a Commissioner Andy Solis, District 2 meeting held Tuesday, July 20, 2021, 9:00 AM, Collier County Library, 2385 Orange Blossom Drive, Naples, FL 34109. Lorraine Lantz, Carmen Monroy (Stantec) and Bill Gramer (Jacobs Engineering) attended. Meeting Notes • Commissioner Solis started the presentation promptly at 9:30 AM. The meeting started with a welcome, format overview. It was noted speakers included Lorraine Lantz. • Lorraine Lantz gave a presentation on the Immokalee Road Corridor Study. The presentation discussed the project need (slide 2), project recommendations (slide 3), proposed intersection improvements (slide 4), and provided contact and project information (slide 5). Slides attached. • Commissioner Solis continued, using a power point presentation to highlight topics of interest. o Vanderbilt Beach Road — project timeline reviewed, discussion on landscaping o Veterans Memorial Blvd Extension — project timeline reviewed, discussion of high school opening and needed improvements o US Army Corps of Engineers Coast Storm Risk Management Study — provided overview and timeline. Discussion of grants, process for development of mitigation projects. o Tourism Update — discussed over all impact of 2020 and the pandemic on tourism and visitors to Collier County. Discussed 2019 as a basis year. Reported 2021 totals to date. Indicated overall increase in visitation from US, overall tourism up +4.8% o Palm River PUR — discussed replacement of clay pipes and other needed repairs. o High Rise Safety Issues — noted ongoing maintenance of buildings critical. Urged attendees to engage with HOAs to make sure inspections are undertaken and maintenance is prioritized. o Mental Health Facility — discussed construction timeline, cost effectiveness of program. Discussed Data Collaborative — one of only a few counties which will have data on program, allowing for data - driven decision making. Questions & Answer Q1 Participant asked about funding the operational costs associated with the Mental Health Facility. Commissioner provided information regarding plans for the Mental Health facility. Q2 Participant asked if any consideration had been given to an interchange off 1-75 at Vanderbilt before considering an overpass? Commissioner noted FDOT is conducting studies to determine need. He noted regardless of the interchange request, improvements along Immokalee Road were still needed. Lorraine Lantz noted FDOT coordination is ongoing. Q3 Participant thanked Commissioner Solis on the communication regarding the vaccine contained in the newsletter. Commissioner spoke about the use of Collier 311. Q4 There was a question regarding storm water management and the use of the Cocohatchee Canal specifically when will it be dredged? Commissioner spoke about ongoing work and coordination with SFWMD. Page I 1 Q5 Participant noted Collier County will be redistricting and asked for an update. Commissioner spoke on the redistricting plans approved at the June BOCC meeting. Q6 Participant asked about the role of planned growth. Commissioner affirmed Collier County continues to work towards planned growth. Q7 Participant asked about future plans for affordable housing in Collier County. The participant added, she thought landscaping was too tall in some medians. Commissioner agreed on the need for affordable housing in Collier County and spoke to recent efforts to address this. Commissioner spoke of median landscaping costs, efforts to use native plantings and appropriately sized plantings. Q8 Participant followed up on the prior statement on affordable housing, indicating support for inclusionary zoning. Commissioner agreed. At approximately 10:30 AM, the question -and -answer period of the meeting ended. Commissioner Solis thanked participants for attending and stated that he would be willing to attend HOA or Neighborhood Meetings if anyone requested his attendance. Collier County Staff took additional questions. • Debbie Littman, President of the Carlton Lakes Master Association addressed Lorraine Lantz. She was provided maps of the proposed overpass. She inquired about the timetable for design. She noted that after the HOA virtual presentation there has been a better understanding of the project and felt there may be less opposition. Lorraine Lantz thanked Ms. Littman for attending. She provided of maps showing the project. Lorraine offered to provide any additional information needed, or attend meetings as requested. • Another resident of Carlton Lakes requested a copy of the map but did not provide his name. He thanked Lorraine Lantz for the presentation. Lorraine Lantz thanked the resident for attending and provided a copy of the project map showing the overpass. Lorraine offered to provide any additional project information needed. • Ernie Verrice inquired about the intersection at Orange Blossom and Airport and any planned improvements. He noted the landscaping company operating at the corner often blocks traffic, impeding free flow off Airport. He stated he had made similar comments to the Collier County during a NIM for Siena Lakes. Mr. Verrice was joined by Anthony Matoni. Mr. Matoni is a BPAC member. He stated conflicts at the intersection and that he has previously brought this up to the Collier MPO and BPAC. Lorraine Lantz thanked Mr. Verrice and Mr. Matoni and noted the intersection. Lorraine offered to refer the information to the appropriate staff for follow up. Lorraine Lantz thanked Commissioner Solis and Angela Goodner for the opportunity to present the Immokalee Rd. Corridor Study and stated that the team would be willing to provide additional project information, if requested, for a neighborhood meeting. Page 12 Immokalee-A Corridor Study Coffee with Commissioner Solis rr«aneer. Larraiir lanc. Ptlrwlpai Immokalee Road Corridor Livingston Road to Logan Boulevard - 9 Intersections Characteristics Considerations -NighL AE rider -Cdlier Cn yn petted • Fv ilen ROYle population gq h ♦"% - neighl DisVI—. Cn.. d"r • -ff. vdame I —eases Designation eap,d,d b grow by "7% • MaRi-mod01 Wen • Leve10 service De[rea5e5 • Cerrseralned Corridor • Tneel Time Reliability • ono W a Cennaainns to I-1s Recommendations f Planned Improvements - h aund opti.n Minor Improvements •nptr ¢esignalnming - • kestripms Lane &5hwlder Repurprtsing Major Innovative-aooctiareM u, �__�'•`,"` Improvements •fherpazs at lmmolslee-Livingston %p. tom Wnmen •I-�S lrtterdlangeimprovements rM1mvah lnehr-rvm lane • partial Displaeed Leh Tula 1Canuauous slow lneerchangei allmmokalee -Logan �- U 7w Immokalee Road .(B) Juliet Blvd?Strand Blvd Conventional Interse t,on • M Norlhb�k Dr/Farpon Bay BMd improvements • [F7 Nkes 81,ed Add �K.— • [G] Vale od Dr - Medinme6Tef — • IHI Execvirve Or Project and Contact Information Lorraine Lantz Principal Planner feLw Eounq Gpatlr prpprrls, pypnlrrE Imes! F— hOren— Mwq, n Lori NanGbcgtmramvllnw TN R191252 57r9 Project wabsire WozI/CollierCountvFLcavloianninastudies Meeting Summary Meeting Notes Date: July 27, 2021 Time: 10:00 AM Location: Collier County, Capital Project Planning, Impact Fees and Program Management Division Subject: Immokalee Road Corridor Study Attendees: Mark Trepanier, Executive Director, Aston Gardens at Pelican Marsh (Senior Living) mtrepanier@astongardens.com Tel239.254.6261 Lorraine Lantz, Principal Planner, Collier County Bill Gramer, Consultant, Jacobs Engineering Carmen Monroy, Consultant, Stantec The group met at Collier County offices to discuss the Immokalee Road Corridor study and planned improvements. Follow up items are highlighted for reference. Lorraine explained the phasing the project, noting the plans provided represent the conceptual phase which is expected through September 2021 when the project will be presented to the BCC. She noted design and construction are expected in future years (2026 — 2030). Staff discussed the need for the corridor study and explained the conceptual design of the overpass at Immokalee Road and Livingston Road including access, at grade through movements as well as the prior version without the at grade through movement. Mr. Trepanier was provided several maps representing the proposed conceptual intersections of Livingston, 1-75 and Logan, as well as the access changes at Livingston Road and Immokalee Road intersection. Mr. Trepanier provided Aston Gardens uses both entrances equally at this time. Mr. Trepanier expressed concerns over signage located off Livingston and the impact of the overpass on sight distances. He inquired about signage regulation and financial assistance for signage impacted by the design. Staff offered this has not been discussed at this phase of the project and that County sign regulations were not anticipated to change based on the overpass. Staff agreed to identify a Collier County contact to discuss commercial signage with Mr. Trepanier. Mr. Trepanier provided he is in conversations with a representative from St. Croix at Pelican Marsh Condominiums. He added Aston Gardens and St. Croix are in conversations regarding signage at the Immokalee Road entrance and are considering joint signage. He discussed his conversation with St. Croix representatives, noting St. Croix's general entrance is located off Immokalee. He noted St. Croix considers the rear entrance off Livingston a secondary access reserved for condominium owners and is card access only. Mr. Trepanier agreed to provide contact information for St. Croix to staff. Mr. Trepanier noted Google Maps provides direction to the Livingston Road entrance. Staff suggested contacting Google Maps regarding potential options for changing how people are directed to the facility. Appendix E.5 Project Survey Responses IMMOKALEE ROAD CORRIDOR CONGESTION STUDY PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT SURVEY Q1 Livingston Rd. and Immokalee Rd. Intersection: The proposed recommendation is a Single Point Urban Interchange (SPUI)/Overpass with Livingston Rd. going over Immokalee Rd. The traffic operations on Immokalee Rd. would remain relatively similar to what they are today. For reference, there is a similar SPUI/overpass located at Golden Gate Pkwy. and Airport -Pulling Rd., in Collier County.Do you have any comments regarding this recommendation? Answered:437 Skipped:392 # RESPONSES DATE 1 About time! 7/2/2021 5:50 PM 2 This is not going to help. If anything ppl will use immokalee road even more. 6/9/2021 1:08 PM 3 N/a 6/2/2021 8:56 PM 4 How will the noise from this overpass affect Carlton Lakes? 6/1/2021 7:36 AM 5 There is no exit into Livingston as one approaches on Immokalee going East. It will be virtually 5/27/2021 4:07 PM impossible to exit from Carlton Lakes due to continuous traffic flow on Livingston Rd. 6 What about establishing an 1-75 interchange at Vanderbilt Beach Rd. That would be a major 5/25/2021 5:36 PM E/W traffic relief for North Naples. The 1-75 overpass at Vanderbilt already exists. 7 Customers from the dreaded "Seed to Table ". Are constantly cutting off persons traveling 5/25/2021 9:16 AM South on Livingston Road That U- turn should be closed off. 8 Continuous Flow Intersection seems less costly and quicker to build. 5/24/2021 4:16 PM 9 Naples needs more local roads & another lane on 175. A bridge will destroy the character of 5/22/2021 10:38 PM Carlton Lakes &other communities in the area. 10 Will it be difficult to enter Carlton Lakes development? 5/20/2021 11:28 AM 11 1 think it is a great idea. 5/18/2021 9:29 AM 12 The title is Immokalee Rd. congestion. The issue is the east -west traffic. Put the flyover that 5/18/2021 7:17 AM direction. The light patterns are horrible as well. The interstate isn't really an issue until the everyday accident happens north or south of Immokalee Road. Typical Collier County Band- Aids. Re -active instead of Pro -active with your decisions. You hand out building permits like candy with no vision as to what the infrastructure may need. 13 Most traffic is headed up Immokalee going East to Rt 75, not so much on Livingston Rd. 5/17/2021 7:21 PM Going north or south. 14 Wouldn't it make more sense to have Immokalee the fly over as most of the traffic is going to 5/17/2021 3:41 PM and from the highway? 15 The Veteran's Parkway needs to be extended to the east of 75. More traffic flow needs to 5/16/2021 10:09 AM move through Vanderbilt Road. Just working on the Immolkalee road will not solve the problem. 16 as a tax payer, i/we pay hugh amounts of $$ for educated experts to study and recommend 5/8/2021 9:53 AM solutions. those people are hired by our elected officials. I/we have no choice but to trust good recommendations are made and elected officials should be held accountable. I would not have a clue. 17 This will just encourage more speeding on Livingston Road. 5/3/2021 5:57 AM 18 No overpass! 5/2/2021 10:14 PM 1/73 IMMOKALEE ROAD CORRIDOR CONGESTION STUDY PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT SURVEY 19 Would help but need to address traffic back up on Immokalee from Rt 41 to Livingston also. 5/2/2021 10:11 AM 20 It's a great idea! 4/30/2021 6:58 PM 21 1 do not believe the issue is N/S but E/W and worst east of Livingston until the 1-75 4/29/2021 2:07 PM interchange. 22 Anything will be better than what it is 4/29/2021 4:07 AM 23 It might help but the izsue is around the big box stores and 175 I'chg. 4/28/2021 3:22 AM 24 It is exactly what we need. 4/27/2021 8:16 PM 25 Yes 4/27/2021 5:29 PM 26 Sounds good 4/27/2021 4:46 PM 27 Love it ....great idea NEEDS DONE!!!!!!! 4/27/2021 4:35 PM 28 It will definitely be needed once the apartments/ condos and the new Naples high school are 4/27/2021 11:59 AM built on North Livingston rd. Seed To Table parking lot will be a cat bus stop as well! 29 1 am not a supporter of overpasses. The one at Airport- Pulling and Golden Gate is oppressive 4/27/2021 11:48 AM and too strongly carves up the neighborhood. 30 No 4/27/2021 11:15 AM 31 Something like this is desperately needed even today during season. 4/27/2021 11:07 AM 32 Yes, please do it! Fast! 4/27/2021 10:58 AM 33 No comment 4/27/2021 10:00 AM 34 The problem is the traffic flow on Immokalee Road rather than on Livingston. The East West 4/27/2021 9:52 AM traffic is too intense for the number of lanes that currently exist 35 Yes, This would help but it would also speed up the traffic which would then bottleneck at 175 4/27/2021 9:07 AM and the 5 traffic lights at that site. 36 I hate it. You are ruining what once was a lovely part of town. We have lived off Immokalee 4/27/2021 8:15 AM Road for nearly 30 years . It was once quiet and lovely. Now it's becoming like Miami. Stop this foolish need to build on every scrap of land, 37 If it will help with traffic flow then I agree. 4/27/2021 8:13 AM 38 Very helpful but extremely difficult during construction. I would support this but it will be 4/27/2021 8:11 AM expensive and how or who will pay for it? 39 Having lived here thirty-five years nothing surprises me with regard to allowances for placing 4/27/2021 7:33 AM cart before horse. Millions spent on studies to no avail. Bottom -line is on the Livingston Overpass what alternative is there? Overpasses and similar big city transportation features while certainly likely safer and more efficient most certainly diminish the unified small town we enjoyed up until maybe a decade ago. However, folks have the right to live where they choose in America. Elected officials however should do deep thinking on what impacts in long term what the continued impact of such high growth means not only on roads but of course, environment, wildlife (what wildlife? D0��000�0000�) 40 I do not want an overpass at immokalee rd. I live in willoughby acres. That will destroy our 4/27/2021 7:20 AM community. The golden gate through way is an eyesore. 41 terrible idea, if anything imokolee should go over livingston all the way to the interstate 4/27/2021 6:38 AM 42 This seems reasonable. I like this proposal. 4/26/2021 9:29 PM 43 Only the beginning of addressing the issue. 4/26/2021 7:54 PM 44 That will not help. The biggest traffic problem is going eastbound. 4/26/2021 7:37 PM 45 There should be an exit on Vanderbilt from 75 to avoid Immokalee 4/26/2021 7:36 PM 46 The overpass on GGP and Immokalee Rd has GGP going over. Your plan here has Livingston 4/26/2021 4:26 PM going over Immokalee. That will not do anything to the traffic flow. The flow of an overpass needs to be Immokalee going OVER Livingston. Immokalee is where the traffic is at.r 2/73 IMMOKALEE ROAD CORRIDOR CONGESTION STUDY PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT SURVEY 47 1 live in Regent Park and I really don't want an overpass down the street from my house. Just 4/26/2021 3:56 PM the look of it reminds me of the cities of which I moved to Naples to get away from 30 years ago. 48 If you're not relieving the traffic on Immokalee then what's the point? 4/26/2021 3:56 PM 49 Need more information. Impact on seed to table business and customer safety) as well as 4/26/2021 3:47 PM employee parking/transportation. Also impact on residents of Carlton Lakes residents. Also need information on noise level impacts for Willoughby residents and Carlton Lakes. We are in far NW Palm River and Livingston is already noticeable. Raised higher will definitely impact noise. Last I think you should look at accident reports for GGP and A -PR intersection. I've seen some bad things there. 50 Love this idea! 4/26/2021 3:37 PM 51 Good idea 4/26/2021 3:31 PM 52 1 live right off of Immokalee and Northbrook drive. We can't even hey out of our development 4/26/2021 3:27 PM between 4.30 and 6 o'clock due to the backup of the ramp on 75. 53 Sounds like a good idea. I'm in favor of the recommendation. 4/26/2021 2:23 PM 54 Not an ideal solution as this is just a band aid approach to resolving the issue of there not 4/26/2021 1:53 PM being enough roads to bring individuals in Eastern collier county to the beach or other Naples attractions. Also, overdevelopment of areas close to the beach is contributing to these issues. Until the county is able to resolve the root issue, continuing overdevelopment where the infrastructure cannot support the growth, the problem is not going to be resolved. 55 If I am traveling west on Immokalee Road and try to turn in residence at Regent Park I can 4/26/2021 1:32 PM never get in during rush hour. And NO ONE will stop to let you thru 56 All for it, Golden Gate works awesome! 4/26/2021 12:49 PM 57 Not needed 4/26/2021 12:37 PM 58 Excellent proposed solution. 4/26/2021 12:23 PM 59 Dislike overpass so close to single family housing. Gives a Metro feel to the area. Maybe local 4/26/2021 11:52 AM commissioners should stop amending long term zoning plans. 60 Living in Delasol, anything to help with a left turn onto Livingston would help. It is very scary 4/26/2021 10:44 AM right now 61 1 like the overpass as I live off of Livingston about A mile north of immokalee. Will this help to 4/26/2021 10:25 AM relieve the traffic on Immokalee? As that is the real issue coming East or west especially if there is an accident on75. The people who bail and come to Livingston to go north make the congestion awful between veterans and bonita beach road heading north on Livingston. Then coming east on immokalee is rough too because it gets backed up so badly from 75 intersection. The traffic on Livingston usually flows pretty well. 62 Construction will be horrible but the outcome favorable 4/26/2021 9:57 AM 63 There is simply too much traffic at this intersection. How does this relieve traffic on Immokalee 4/26/2021 9:39 AM Rd.? It doesn't do a thing. Stop developing now! 64 An overpass on Livingston isn't going to help the congestion heading west and east on 4/26/2021 9:27 AM Immokalee road. Why not open some on ramps only and Vanderbilt and 1-75? This would help the congestion getting on 75. 65 Would be much improved with this change! 4/26/2021 9:12 AM 66 This improvement would be great and help keep traffic flowing. 4/26/2021 9:10 AM 67 Sounds good, though, if the timing of the stop lights were in better sync you could most likely 4/26/2021 9:00 AM avoid this problem. 68 Do it please!! The sooner the better. 4/26/2021 8:31 AM 69 They need a light in and out of seed to table Or at the back entrance to carton lakes ! All the 4/26/2021 7:59 AM cars from seed to table Just whiz by to try and U turn to get onto Immokalee road . It's a death trap ! 3/73 IMMOKALEE ROAD CORRIDOR CONGESTION STUDY PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT SURVEY 70 Immokalee Rd is the congested road not Livingston Rd. How will this help ease the congestion 4/26/2021 7:52 AM on Immokalee Rd? 71 Should the overpass be 6 lanes, like Livingston at that location? 4/26/2021 7:50 AM 72 This is much needed !!!! 4/26/2021 7:45 AM 73 Works well at Airport & Golden Gate 4/26/2021 7:43 AM 74 Sounds like major improvement. 4/26/2021 7:26 AM 75 This makes sense to me, but do we really need 3 left turn lanes from SB Livingston onto 4/25/2021 9:16 PM Immokalee Rd EB? 76 The overpass should be on Immokalee Road, not Livingston as proposed if you are going to 4/25/2021 8:02 PM continue to allow the present development. 77 Carpool!!!!!!! 4/25/2021 5:03 PM 78 Opposed 4/25/2021 4:32 PM 79 No 4/25/2021 4:14 PM 80 If I lived in one of those residential communities I'd be up in arms! 4/24/2021 5:41 PM 81 No 4/24/2021 4:28 PM 82 The proposal looks good in expediting north/south travel on Livingston Road, access to Seed 4/24/2021 6:52 AM and Table appears similar as exists now. Support 83 Try to avoid Immokalee Rd and use Vanderbilt beach rd 4/23/2021 9:31 AM 84 The congestion is mostly on Immokalee and really bad. Live it everyday at that intersection. 4/23/2021 6:18 AM What about an overpass on Immokalee over Livingston. 85 I support this proposal. 4/22/2021 8:55 PM 86 Do it now. 4/22/2021 3:22 PM 87 There needs to be a bypass in Golden Gate Estates, perhaps one near the toll road and one in 4/22/2021 11:52 AM the middle of The Estate area! This idea was put on the board years ago and got pushed under the rug so to speak. If SOMEONE WOULD PLEASE PICK UP THIS ALTERNATIVE AND GET IT DONE! THIS IS YEARS BEYOND NEEDING TO BE DONE AFTER BEING A RESIDENT OF OUR BEAUTIFUL NAPLES SINCE 1980, we prided ourselves in keeping continuity. Please do take my plea seriously, If you would still like my input, I am available to be reached at the following info. LADONNA W URI 12966 White Violet Drive Quail Creek Estates Naples, Florida 34119 Telephone: (239) 289-6464 88 Traffic lights on both streets are over the top is one reason but how else would one enter some 4/22/2021 11:00 AM of the traffic light areas if there wasn't a light? You go a block after one red light hit another one not productive at all in solving traffic congestion on either roadway. 89 We need another access to 75 at Vanderbilt beach road full interchange that would keep alot of 4/22/2021 10:13 AM traffic off Immokalee.. 90 Excellent idea. The overpass at Airport Pulling works great. 4/22/2021 9:49 AM 91 An answer to all the questions. Simply stop building/sandwiching new houses and new condos. 4/22/2021 6:36 AM The more you build, the more roads you'll need. Eventually you will have a Miami or Ft Lauderdale. That's not was Naples was designed to be. This is the simple answer. 92 the congestion is caused by over building/ over population. 4/22/2021 6:05 AM 93 Great idea really helps keep traffic moving not a lot of accidents 4/22/2021 3:41 AM 94 Great idea. 4/21/2021 9:37 PM 95 Good. Please in this area do not cram the homes in. The County has created to many homes 4/21/2021 8:33 PM in small areas due to letting developers have more homes. 96 Yes please! 4/21/2021 6:24 PM 4/73 IMMOKALEE ROAD CORRIDOR CONGESTION STUDY PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT SURVEY 97 The same problem exists at Immokalee and Collier Blvd. I would suggest continuing the 4/21/2021 5:26 PM project past 951 98 1 disagree placing an overpass at this location. It is understandable that there will be increased 4/21/2021 4:53 PM traffic, but creating faster routes only fuels larger developments at the rural fringe, eventually increasing traffic And congestion further. This cycle will not end. 99 Protect residents in Carlton Lakes since Seed to Table has added congestion to their 4/18/2021 12:12 PM neighborhood entrance and exit. 100 As a 8 year resident of Carlton Lakes, the increase in east bound traffic on Immokalee Rd., is 4/16/2021 2:40 PM more prevalent.... and my greatest concern with the overpass is Greater Noise Pollution for Carlton Lakes and other residents! 101 Over passes, although expensive seem to work well. Example is airport pulling road. 4/16/2021 12:44 PM 102 1 live (own) in Carlton Lakes, and I am against this proposal! I use this intersection multiple 4/16/2021 11:31 AM times a day, and do NOT want an overpass to be constructed here. It is unnecessary! 103 As a resident of Carlton Lakes, I am opposed to this proposed recommendation. I don't see 4/16/2021 7:43 AM this as a solution to the traffic on Immokalee Rd. and the the congestion from residents out East heading into town or traffic flowing from 1-75. And you want to change our South gate entrance! This will make it more dangerous to get out of our subdivision and lower our property values. We will also bear the brunt of Seed to Table traffic into our community. That store has already brought chaos to our community! Put a traffic light at our North gate. Much cheaper! This is devastating to many of our residents at Carlton Lakes. Come to our board meeting and LISTEN to us!! WE PAY TAXES TOO, NOT JUST THE BIG BUSINESSES AND BUILDERS!! 104 It is a busy intersection and this would improve traffic flow. What type of noise mitigation would 4/15/2021 7:52 PM be offered to the people living nearby on the south side of Immokalee? 105 The traffic on Livingston is not the problem; it is the traffic flow on Immokolee causes the 4/14/2021 1:12 PM traffic back up. I do too see how this overpass is going to resolve the issue and reduce the amount of traffic on Immokolee. 106 Poor planning has created the very"problems" you are trying to solve. No matter when travel 4/14/2021 11:35 AM patterns or numbers have been assessed and documented, the data is never accurate because of continuous and rampant overdevelopment along both the Livingston Rd.and Immokalee Rd.corridors. Every, once green parcel of land is currently cleared and under construction... with no end is sight. Naples which touts itself as paradise is no longer one. Aside from the physical movement of automobiles and trucks , there appears to be no concern for the excessive toxic emissions from these very same vehicles. I live here. It matters ! 107 The SPUI over Immokalee Road makes sense as I live in Carlton Lakes and see the increased 4/14/2021 7:13 AM traffic. I have two concerns: 1) the movement of the access management alternative(south end of Carlton Lakes Blvd). With traffic going north off of the SPUI, speed will be greatly increased making it more difficult to turn left into Carlton Lakes Blvd from the south lanes. Currently during season and with the normal increased traffic, we rely on the red light at the Livingston/Immokalee intersection to give us a break in the traffic flow to make the right turn out of our Carlton Lakes Blvd. The SPUI should help in this endeavor. There will be less traffic in that lane. However, this change will make it very difficult for the Seed to Table delivery trucks (18 wheelers) to negotiate the suggested curve in the access alternative. Would like to see the current left turn lane from the southbound lanes eliminated. Southbound could exit Livingston, go under bridge and left again into SingleNB Thru Lane. 2) Concerns about being able to exit from the north gate of Carlton Lakes Blvd onto Livingston. This is a dangerous intersection currently. The speed of the southbound lanes will be higher as frequent travelers on Livingston will know the intersection has been eliminated thus making a left turn out of our north gate more unsafe. Again, we rely on the red light at Livingston/Immokalee to give us a break in the traffic flow to exit. Carlton Lakes will be taking the brunt of this change to the SPUI and would hope the county will work closely with us to reduce the SPUI's impact on our 800 home/condo community. Both of our exits will be greatly impacted. 108 The same nightmare exists at airport and Pine Ridge. A new exchange at Vanderbilt and 1-75 4/12/2021 12:14 PM will additionally reduce traffic at Immokalee. 109 Great idea. 4/12/2021 11:32 AM 110 This is great at golden gate and airport pulling. You should do this here and at 41 and 951 in 4/12/2021 9:55 AM 5/73 IMMOKALEE ROAD CORRIDOR CONGESTION STUDY PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT SURVEY south naples. 111 Excellent proposal 4/12/2021 9:26 AM 112 1 am concerned that Carlton Lakes, a modest community with no clout, will be trapped along 4/12/2021 8:44 AM much of our western border (Livingston) with a giant concrete wall. I think this causes several issues: 1) Noise --already an issue, a raised roadway will make the noise much worse 2) Access --I am uncertain now far north on Livingston the construction will go to provide the overpass. The main entrance to Carlton Lakes is "to be discussed." Somehow, I have the feeling any change will benefit Alfie Oakes and not Carlton Lakes. At our back entrance, we are able to go either north or south on Livingston, but it is quite dangerous. I believe we need a traffic light there so that Carlton Lakes and Delasol have a safe way to get onto Livingston. The typical U-turn solution is terrible --you need at least two lanes to be open to safely make a U-turn--and maybe three if you drive a large vehicle, and with increased traffic levels this is really unsafe. 3) Property values will likely drop as Carlton Lakes becomes harder to access and noisier. The real problem is that the Developers rule! They all bought property speculatively, and now seem to be able to increase the units they want to build to line their pockets. Yes, these are tax payers for the county, but the negative impact never seems to matter. This project will be expensive, but as population here increases, it will be a bandaid on a huge surgical wound. We really need more East/West roadways to access 175 and take the pressure off of Immokolee. Vanderbilt is under consideration. What about Veterans Parkway? Extending that to 175 might impinge on a couple of golf courses, but would really help with the extra traffic that is going to come from the new development there. I hope that the Commissioners will not approve this project as envisioned, and trully consider the impact on the communities involved. By the way, Lorraine Lantz was very helpful in answering my questions about the process and the plans for the Livingston/Immokolee intersection. Janice Elsesser 113 Agree with this proposal. 4/12/2021 8:04 AM 114 No 4/12/2021 6:55 AM 115 The problem starts at Collier Blvd and not from Logan. Please consider a comprehensive 4/11/2021 8:36 PM solution that includes from where the traffic originates. Get to the source of the problem. 116 GGP is so well done. Would like to see that at Livingston. Collier will need it, too. 4/11/2021 8:02 PM 117 1) How is congestion on Immokalee helped if traffic operations are largely unchanged on 4/11/2021 7:11 PM Immokalee? 2) What are the impacts on the Delasol Lane & Livingston intersection? The N/S traffic light on Livingston at Immokalee creates traffic breaks allowing left turns onto Livingstion. Without the traffic breaks, left turns will become more dangerous. Does this necessitate a traffic light at Delasol Lane & Livingston? 118 It would be good but the NB needs to be 2 lanes and there should be no turn on red. I make a 4/11/2021 5:47 PM u turn here everyday and the right turn do not look or slow down. Have been almost hit by a school bus, trash truck, trucks, etc.. I have large vehicle that you can't miss. 119 Install a traffic light on the corner of Delasol LN and Livingston 3/4 mi. North of Immokalee 4/11/2021 2:30 PM (already has left and right turn lanes into Delasol and the North gate of Carlton Lakes). Construct a 2 lane access road along the East side of Livingston from the existing Carlton Lakes main entrance North to the Carlton North gate and therefore the new traffic light. Close off the existing access from Carlton to Livingston. This access road from the new Delasol/Carlton traffic light would serve to access Carlton (both entrances) as well as the side parking lot of the new Oakes market. This would help Carlton Lakes, Delasol, and Oakes while easing traffic flow along Livingston as it ramps up to the proposed Immokalee overpass. CHUCK VALERY 239-593-9329. 120 Excellent idea! 4/11/2021 1:45 PM 121 Concur 4/11/2021 12:47 PM 122 1 am a resident of the Delasol community on Livingston Rd. just north of Immokalee Rd. I like 4/11/2021 12:30 PM this concept but would urge a traffic light to the north at the intersection of Delasol Ln. and Livingston. 123 If it helps congestion then i agree with proposal. 4/11/2021 11:15 AM 124 Has there been any consideration to extending a thruway on Collier Rd to Bonita Beach Rd in 4/11/2021 11:06 AM lieu of this? 6/73 IMMOKALEE ROAD CORRIDOR CONGESTION STUDY PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT SURVEY 125 The overpass should run on Immokalee rd. From a half mile west of i75 to a half mile east. 4/11/2021 10:36 AM Similar to Golden gate parkway over airport pulling. Take a look at the east coast ft.lauderdale area with all the fly overs. 126 This is a great idea. 4/11/2021 10:04 AM 127 1 see a lot of issues with how long the stop lights are currently set. It builds large groups of 4/11/2021 10:03 AM vehicles commencing travel at one time. If shortened stop light times would result in smaller groups of vehicles traveling together. 128 1 think that would be helpful. 4/11/2021 8:25 AM 129 If the overpass configuration has reduced the number of accidents as opposed to adding 4/11/2021 8:03 AM turning lanes then that is a solution and increase the smooth flow of traffic, then this is good. 130 1 feel as though there is not enough traffic on Livingston throughout the day to recommend a 4/11/2021 7:36 AM big change like this. It won't help regulate traffic onto Immokalee Rd it will increase it. 131 Good lord where do I even begin ? It usually takes 2 light changes to turn onto Livingston. 4/11/2021 7:13 AM 132 Like it 4/11/2021 6:51 AM 133 Would agree these back ups occur quite r 4/11/2021 6:40 AM 134 This overpass could be helpful as long as "local" traffic can still get to Seed to Table store. 4/11/2021 6:26 AM 135 Good idea but lower priority. 4/11/2021 5:47 AM 136 Good idea. 4/11/2021 5:32 AM 137 It would be helpful, but what will happen with bike lanes? Also, with more and more traffic on 4/11/2021 1:19 AM Livingston, and new developments being added, there needs to be a stop light at the entrance to Delasol/Carlton Lakes. Making a left out of Delasol to travel north on Livingston is increasingly dangerous, especially in season; but if you elect to turn right (south) to go to the U-turn turnaround, you have to travel almost to the Immokalee intersection --and with heavy Seed to Table traffic, that's becoming more dangerous, too. (Looks like the overpass might eliminate the current turnaround point as well, giving residents of Delasol no safe alternatives when they want to travel north on Livingston.) P.S. Why has a car dealership been approved near this corner on the SE side of Immokalee? That will add an insane amount of traffic at an already problematic intersection. 138 Would be helpful 4/11/2021 1:13 AM 139 Yes you should definitely go forward with SPUI plan to help keep traffic moving. 4/11/2021 12:38 AM 140 A larger map showing where the overpass begins & ends with better detail (mile legend) would 4/10/2021 11:47 PM help to understand this proposal. I live on Livingston Rd near the Regional Park. The nearby communities would be impacted by construction of an overpass even with a positive outcome for future traffic. What's the plan for entering/exiting communities & Regional Park? 141 This appears to be a reasonable plan. 4/10/2021 9:45 PM 142 The congestion is located on Immokalee and Northbrook Roads, (westbound on Immokalee) 4/10/2021 9:26 PM way before you get to Livingston. Also making it hard to get access to 175 north ramp. 143 None. I only drive that way once in a blue moon but the last time was not enough time for cars 4/10/2021 8:47 PM to get through 144 Yes they should do it. This is a busy interchange 4/10/2021 8:33 PM 145 Please look at Immokalee Rd. further east to Quarry Drive. With all the building at Immokalee 4/10/2021 5:55 PM & Collier it will be a nightmare. 146 The recommendation seems to be similar to Airport and GG Parkway which works well. 4/10/2021 5:36 AM Livingston's traffic flow is worse north toward the Lee County line where a lane is list to 2. This hinders flow during rush hour, hurricane evac, and accidents on 175. The North/ South options need addressing as well. 147 1 don't believe this approach will address the congestion going E/W Immokolee Rd. itself, 4/9/2021 2:18 AM which is far greater than the traffic going N/S on Livingston. 7/73 IMMOKALEE ROAD CORRIDOR CONGESTION STUDY PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT SURVEY 148 We need a bridge or another option aside from immokalee to travel To and from living in the 4/8/2021 9:32 PM estates due to traffic 149 Hopefully it will help the area without being too unattractive. The backups on Immokalee Riad 4/8/2021 7:14 PM can be awful 150 no 4/8/2021 5:44 PM 151 Think this is a good solution. 4/8/2021 3:26 PM 152 This would be great! 4/8/2021 2:01 PM 153 Safe left turn egress from Carlton Lakes Blvd. needs to be considered. As a result of the 4/8/2021 11:54 AM single point interchange, the flows and available gaps on Livingston NB will change significantly and make it more difficult for exiting Carlton Lake traffic wishing to make a U turn to go SB on Livingston. Safety is a concern because of the increased speeds which will occur on Livingston, probable reduced sight distance due to the over vertical, and shortened length available to weave across three lanes of traffic to make the U turn to go SB on Livingston. In addition, traffic growth on Livingston will continue to increase reducing available SB gaps for the U turn movement. This together with high volumes of U turns and high speeds on Livingston are a safety concern. Recommend that this concern be added to the study. 154 Sounds good 4/8/2021 8:34 AM 155 1 agree an overpass would be very beneficial. 4/7/2021 9:02 PM 156 This would be an improvement. 4/7/2021 7:38 AM 157 No 4/6/2021 9:22 PM 158 This I personally don't mind however I feel this is just a get back at Seed to Table. So it's 4/6/2021 9:16 PM whatever. 159 Why continue to allow development when the roads need so much improvement. Don't develop 4/6/2021 7:19 PM until roadways are in place Why not put the overpass on Immokalee. Most of the traffic is west/east. Need more info regarding the impact on Carlton Lakes 160 If it will not improve traffic why spend the money 4/6/2021 6:49 PM 161 This would be great! 4/6/2021 6:02 PM 162 Agree with recommendation 4/6/2021 2:55 PM 163 Looks like something you see in Fort Lauderdale! Ugly and doesn't fit in with surrounding area. 4/6/2021 1:46 PM 164 That is a great idea. The one on GGP works well and traffic moves smoothly w/o stopping. 4/6/2021 1:17 PM 165 There needs to be something done further E of Logan. We live in Heritage Greens and have 4/6/2021 1:12 PM terrible time exiting our community. We can't use any other way to exit, just Immokalee Rd. There needs to continue to be 3 thru traffic lanes. 166 1 think it's a good idea, especially with Seed to Table there and all the extra traffic. 4/6/2021 12:52 PM 167 1 think it will work I like this idea 4/6/2021 11:48 AM 168 This seem unnecessarily complex because this intersection is not the problem on Immokalee. 4/6/2021 10:37 AM 169 Good Idea 4/6/2021 9:41 AM 170 Anything to help the flow on Immokalee, So yes we are in favor. Also desperate need for a 4/6/2021 8:53 AM Heritage Greens traffic light at our entrance. 171 Where will the overpass begin on Livingston? How does this impact Livingston Lakes access 4/6/2021 8:52 AM exit onto Livingston? Will the u-turn at the intersection remain? 172 This area is at the end of the actual problem. It is farther East on Immokalee. Valewood, 4/6/2021 8:47 AM Tarpon Bay, 75 and the Strand Blvd. This backs up at times all the way to Collier Blvd. This gets worse when the schools let out at 3 and 4 PM. 173 Immokalee backs up here too. 4/6/2021 8:14 AM 174 They should address coming out of Livingston Lakes and being able to make a left into a 4/6/2021 8:08 AM 8/73 IMMOKALEE ROAD CORRIDOR CONGESTION STUDY PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT SURVEY merging lane onto Livingston southbound...... we should not have to go to the light and make a U-turn....... looks like we are turning Collier County into Miami/Ft Lauderdale with the overpasses 175 Anything that has been studied and can help. 4/6/2021 7:49 AM 176 Not sure why it is necessary. 4/6/2021 7:19 AM 177 We are starting to look like Ft. Lauderdale traffic. Leave the roads alone. 4/6/2021 7:10 AM 178 While this project will improve traffic movement it will severely affect my quality of life. I live in 4/6/2021 6:56 AM Carlton Lakes directly adjacent to the project. Construction activities will be dissruptive, annoying and unsafe for residients. Rather that undertake this hugh capital costs would it not be better to limit residential growth along the corridor? 179 1 think this is a good idea. 4/6/2021 4:36 AM 180 Computerize signal lights on Immokalee road to improve traffic flow. 4/6/2021 4:15 AM 181 Coming out of Livingston Lakes subdivision, will we still be able to make a U-turn at 4/5/2021 11:06 PM Immokalee (our only way to go south on Livingston)? Or, will you add a light and left turn out? 182 Good idea. 4/5/2021 10:02 PM 183 Sounds like it may help 4/5/2021 9:22 PM 184 1 think this is an excellent plan 4/5/2021 9:07 PM 185 That doesn't help Immokalee 4/5/2021 8:42 PM 186 Overpass should be on Immokalee with direct connect to 75. No overpass on Livingston Road 4/5/2021 7:51 PM 187 Love it 4/5/2021 7:18 PM 188 Necessary at this time. 4/5/2021 7:18 PM 189 We definitely need a remedy to relieve the bottlenecking. What happened to the CR951 (Collier 4/5/2021 7:10 PM Blvd.) extension into Logan to alleviate traffic from these congested areas going to and from 175?? We need to provide alternate routes to get traffic off of Immokalee Rd. in this area. 190 It seems to work for Golden Gate Blvd and Airport Pulling Toad quite well. 4/5/2021 7:00 PM 191 How would residents of Livingston Lakes exit the community and be able to head South on 4/5/2021 6:48 PM Livingston Rd.? 192 Expensive option to ease traffic congestion. 4/5/2021 6:22 PM 193 Not a bad idea 4/5/2021 3:15 PM 194 1 like the overpass at Golden Gate Parkway. Just curious why Immokalee Road wouldn't be the 4/5/2021 2:17 PM road that got the overpass over Livingston Road instead of the other way around. 195 Anything is better than what we have now 4/5/2021 2:10 PM 196 YES! This is needed so badly and would help tremendously with moving the traffic. It takes 4/5/2021 2:03 PM way longer than it should to move through this part of town, and not just during "work" hours... it is more and more congested throughout the entire day. 197 This will help as traffic backs up in all 4 directions at peak travel hours. But it will not solve the 4/5/2021 1:57 PM problem! 198 Yes. Good idea. Also need one for Collier and Immokalee. 4/5/2021 12:05 PM 199 great idea 4/5/2021 11:51 AM 200 STOP DEVELOPING EAST 4/5/2021 11:35 AM 201 Agree with your recommendations 4/5/2021 11:23 AM 202 This is a worthwhile improvement. 4/5/2021 10:53 AM 203 1 like it. 4/5/2021 10:23 AM 204 These changes will do VERY LITTLE to reduce congestion on Immokakee Road. On top of 4/5/2021 9:58 AM 9/73 IMMOKALEE ROAD CORRIDOR CONGESTION STUDY PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT SURVEY that you are only adding MORE homes on Immokakee and Collier Road. Find a way to detour this huge influx of cars onto Bonita Road to avoid the 175 congestion ! Or build an outer belt hwy. Even if it's a toll road! Immokakee is bumper to bumper now all the way to Randell where more homes are going up). Smh. 205 We need the traffic flow to be improved at this intersection on Immokalee Rd. I have never 4/5/2021 9:30 AM seen an issue with the North/South traffic on Livingston. 206 1 think this is needed for sure. 4/5/2021 7:56 AM 207 This would be beneficial to keep traffic flowing N&S with little interruption. 4/5/2021 7:03 AM 208 No need for overpass to have Livingston "fly over" Immokalee Road. Livingston Road traffic is 4/5/2021 7:00 AM not the issue, Immokalee Road traffic is. Focus on improving traffic flow East of Livingston on Immokalee Road; especially signal timing of the signal at The Strand and Juliet Lane, that is a major tie up. Also, improve the Southbound exit from The Strand to have a dedicated Westbound (right) turn lane 209 No, other than we need to do something 4/5/2021 6:25 AM 210 This would be a mess but most feasible option 4/5/2021 6:11 AM 211 Seed to Table made a real mess of this intersection. Overpass makes sense. 4/4/2021 9:56 PM 212 1 like this. 4/4/2021 7:12 PM 213 This is definitely needed as traffic backs up at this intersection and drivers illegally block the 4/4/2021 12:38 PM box tripling the driving time. 214 Like this idea, if it is similar to Golden Gate Parkway overpass on Airport Rd 4/3/2021 3:43 PM 215 What will be the height of the overpass. Residents of CL will be violently opposed to anything 4/3/2021 11:17 AM that they can see or hear. 216 Sounds good. We need this now. Don't delay this project any further. 4/2/2021 5:26 PM 217 Good solution to decongest . 4/2/2021 5:05 PM 218 Question why three EB Immokalee turn lanes from SB Livingston would be preferable to 4/1/2021 9:19 PM having two and a single SB Livingston thru lane similar to the single NB Livingston thru lane. 219 Horrible idea for a few hours of the day for traffic. Time the lights. You are only moving the 4/1/2021 1:47 PM traffic down to next light at Vanderbilt. The Golden Gate flyover wasn't needed back then or now. You only moved the traffic to another light east or west bound. It was a waste of money. I use it everyday, doesn't save any time. 220 Probably a good solution, but I worry about the impact on traffic for the considerable time it will 3/31/2021 8:13 PM take to build this. 221 Not sure what the access management alternative would do to theCarlton Lakes Development 3/31/2021 6:53 PM entrance and exit. 222 Would NOT like to see an overpass. Takes away from the beauty of the area. 3/31/2021 12:35 PM 223 This makes a good deal of sense. 3/31/2021 12:12 PM 224 Concur 3/31/2021 11:09 AM 225 1 think more needs to be done for traffic on Immokalee. It's a parking lot even in the middle of 3/31/2021 10:43 AM the day from Livingston to Oaks Blvd. 226 Interesting concept. Speed may have to be reduced significantly until people get the hang of it. 3/31/2021 9:29 AM Jersey walls may help. How fast can this get done? Sooner is always better. 227 How will this help congestion on Immokalee Road? Many issues are due to traffic coming out 3/31/2021 8:46 AM of Seed to Table and crossing all lanes on WB Immokalee Road to make a left onto Livingston. I don't see how a flyover would be accessed . Someone wasn't thinking when they approved StT. 228 N/A 3/30/2021 9:01 PM 229 Bike lane must be improved and be safe 3/30/2021 3:39 PM 10/73 IMMOKALEE ROAD CORRIDOR CONGESTION STUDY PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT SURVEY 230 No 3/30/2021 2:40 PM 231 Good recommendation. Would be as successful as Golden Gate/Airport overpass. 3/30/2021 1:09 PM 232 This is very necessary to relieve existing congestion 3/30/2021 12:45 PM 233 Love this idea! Not confusing for people to follow 3/30/2021 9:40 AM 234 1 am very much in favor of it. 3/29/2021 8:44 PM 235 No 3/29/2021 6:06 PM 236 In Germany, if you go through a green light and adhere to the speed limit you will be able to 3/29/2021 12:22 PM know all light thereafter will be green when you arrive. Consider light sequencing as a first step now. 237 Traffic only heavier in season nit warranting an overpass which will cause more traffic noise 3/29/2021 8:20 AM above all condos in this intersection so NOT IN FAVOR,!! 238 Get the lights timed so traffic can make it through more than 1 light at a time 3/29/2021 5:56 AM 239 This would keep traffic moving on Livingston better. Not sure how this would help Immokalee 3/28/2021 11:00 PM Rd traffic which seems to be the bigger problem. 240 Excellent idea. Should work well at this location. 3/28/2021 10:31 PM 241 The main problem is not N/S travel. It is traffic turning to get on 1-75, especially from 3/28/2021 8:05 PM Livingston travel heading N. That intersection has a dangerous flow related to traffic leaving Seed to Table that crosses 5 lanes of traffic so they can make a U turn at Livingston to head E. An overpass is overkill. What an eyesore this area will become! 242 Agree. 3/28/2021 8:05 PM 243 1 recently moved upstairs after living in Naples fror 18 years. I see one of the craziest 3/28/2021 7:52 PM intersection is the Immokalee /collier Blvd. It has to be one one ofvthe busiest in South Florida. There are srip malls on both the North a nd South side of Immokalee Rd. The traffic light system is dizzying. 244 Overpass would be great, keep traffic moving and give drivers accessibility to get on 3/28/2021 7:30 PM immokalee if they need it 245 Turning left (southbound) into Livingston from westbound Immokalee there should be no U-turn. 3/28/2021 7:01 PM During rush hour only 1 or 2 cars can u-turn which clogs up one of the left turn lanes. 246 Yes 3/28/2021 5:13 PM 247 If it relieves traffic directly on Immokalee, it's good. 3/28/2021 5:11 PM 248 The medians should be removed and a turning lane runs the whole street 3/28/2021 4:57 PM 249 This intersection doesnt get congested enough to warrant this overpass. 3/28/2021 4:52 PM 250 Would love an overpass like golden gate and airport pulling 3/28/2021 4:18 PM 251 Build it 3/28/2021 4:15 PM 252 1 think as proposed is a great plan!! 3/28/2021 4:00 PM 253 Makes sense Less businesses impacted in this intersection. 3/28/2021 3:58 PM 254 Whatever will relieve the congestion will be an improvement. Immokalee Rd us just horribly 3/28/2021 3:29 PM congested, either direction, much of the time! 255 That would be good 3/28/2021 2:16 PM 256 It seems like immokalee is so crowded because it is the only road that you can take to get to 3/28/2021 12:54 PM many new developments east of the highway. And this study area is the only way you can go north. There needs to be alternate ways to get out east and alternate ways to go north from the orange tree or east developments. 257 Good proposal 3/28/2021 12:15 PM 258 A dedicated turning lane starting more down the road. Because traffic buils up so fast for both 3/28/2021 12:13 PM 11/73 IMMOKALEE ROAD CORRIDOR CONGESTION STUDY PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT SURVEY turning lanes, and the middle traffic can't move some times. 259 A good idea!! 3/28/2021 11:28 AM 260 Good idea 3/28/2021 11:27 AM 261 Better timing of lights is an immediate solution 3/28/2021 11:16 AM 262 What about an Immokalee overpass going over Livingston? That would speed up all those cars 3/28/2021 10:30 AM headed to 1-95 and keep traffic moving in all directions. 263 1 think that plan would be at a standstill trying to get onto the overpass 3/28/2021 10:16 AM 264 Good Idea 3/28/2021 8:23 AM 265 This intersection is not the worst, but the left turn lanes from Immokalee Rd (westbound) onto 3/28/2021 8:18 AM Livingston Rd (South) needs longer turning time. 266 You can do that and also consider adding an exit/entrance for 175 on Everglades so that people 3/28/2021 8:11 AM coming from the estates have an access point to the highway. This plays into the congestion in this area. We also need more that two entry exit points for the GG Estates area. There are not any backstreet/alternative route options because of all of these planned communities that block access to roads that could potentially be alternative routes. I will never understand why there aren't more free standing home building in all that open area and only communities being built. 267 Do it 3/28/2021 7:47 AM 268 1 think the overpass should be Immokolee over Livingston. 3/28/2021 7:17 AM 269 Go forward with the plans. 3/27/2021 8:46 PM 270 Good idea 3/27/2021 8:03 PM 271 Don't feel an overpass over Immokalee from Livingston would be beneficial, this intersection is 3/27/2021 7:46 PM not the problem. 272 Monitor the right turns on red. Many don't yield to uturns. 3/27/2021 7:24 PM 273 This would be great, as long as the improvements at 1-75 happen as well to keep the E-W 3/27/2021 6:44 PM traffic moving. 274 This makes sense. Seed to Table has increased traffic and has a terrible entry/exit (you can't 3/27/2021 5:32 PM easily exit to get back onto Immokalee, and it's challenging to enter from Livingston. The overpass makes sense to shrink some of the traffic flow from the store plus from all of the new development on Veterans Pkwy. 275 Great idea! 3/27/2021 4:56 PM 276 The traffic flow is much smoother and faster, although the lanes can be very confusing if you 3/27/20214:31 PM aren't familiar with the pattern. 277 That is a good idea. 3/27/2021 2:15 PM 278 Intersections at 75 and University, up by Sarasota. East is Lakewood Ranch. It was a bit 3/27/2021 1:35 PM confusing at first but it's proved to be a very positive change to the congestion 279 1 think it is a good idea 3/27/2021 11:38 AM 280 Great Plan! 100% needed. 3/27/2021 11:27 AM 281 The entrance and exit at Seed to Table needs to be described in some detail. 3/27/2021 10:35 AM 282 It's not north/south that's bad it's east/west. Signals aren't timed to let traffic flow.Traffic 3/27/2021 10:09 AM starting at 2pm backs up east bound to airport rd 283 Useless. You need to move the volume further west on Immokalee, not north/south on 3/27/2021 9:38 AM Livingston. Once the light goes red westbound on Immokalee traffic will back up. 284 Build an on -off ramp for 75 in both direct at Vanderbilt Road. That'll keep people from feeding 3/27/2021 9:26 AM (funneling) to either Pine Ridge or immokalee. At the moment too much traffic funnels from other roads to get on the highway. 12/73 IMMOKALEE ROAD CORRIDOR CONGESTION STUDY PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT SURVEY 285 This seems reasonable and effective 3/27/2021 8:57 AM 286 1 hope this doesn't mean 5 years of construction 3/27/2021 8:09 AM 287 It may help some but the problem of the big jam up is turning right onto Immokalee ... so I'm not 3/27/2021 7:57 AM sure an overpass would alleviate that issue. It would be nice though if people were trying to get up into Bonita without going onto 75. 1 doubt that people r doing that anyway because of the congestion of turning right then left onto 75. 288 no 3/27/2021 7:50 AM 289 Operations on Immokolee can not remain similar what they r today - all operations need 3/27/2021 7:08 AM changed - not sure about overpass now if nothing changes Immokolee 0 s 290 Wouldn't it make more sense to build a overpass on Immakolee rather than Livingston? 3/27/2021 6:23 AM 291 1 agree with this decision 3/27/2021 5:58 AM 292 1 really like this idea 3/27/2021 4:21 AM 293 1 strongly support this. 3/26/2021 10:27 PM 294 The golden gate parkway overpass has not relieved much, it still get backed up at the 3/26/2021 9:49 PM Goodlette rd intersection at rush hour. I'd look into other options. 295 1 think an overpass is needed. 3/26/2021 8:23 PM 296 There definitely needs to be an overpass here. It is far too congested heading east on 3/26/2021 8:16 PM Immokalee at rush hour. Traffic light patterns do not help the traffic. 297 STOP the new developement!! roads are insufficient already. 3/26/2021 7:33 PM 298 Shorten the green traffic light on Livingston 3/26/2021 7:22 PM 299 Like it and it should be first on the list. 3/26/2021 6:56 PM 300 The problem is east -west traffic on Immokalee, so how much help would this be if Immokalee 3/26/2021 6:30 PM remains relatively similar? 301 Overpass 3/26/2021 6:21 PM 302 This would be helpful however most of the excess traffic is coming from the orange tree, 3/26/2021 6:19 PM Valencia and imokkalee areas. 303 Where will bikers and pedestrians go? Terrible to get down Immokalee on North side. No 3/26/2021 6:17 PM sidewalks after Livingston. 304 Slow the growth first, which has created the problems in the 1st place. First the Golden Gate 3/26/2021 6:06 PM Parkway bridge, now Livingston Rd? You'll end up with Miami, and then people will start looking for the next Naples. 305 This would make it difficult to access Livingston Rd. from Immokalee Rd. 3/26/2021 5:40 PM 306 It will make things worse. 3/26/2021 5:25 PM 307 Strongly agree and recommend 3/26/2021 5:00 PM 308 Something is needed and welcome the change, 3/26/20214:57 PM 309 Great idea! 3/26/2021 4:54 PM 310 How much traffic would come off Immokalee with this expensive Livingston overpass? 3/26/2021 4:45 PM 311 1 think an overpass would be a great idea. 3/26/2021 4:38 PM 312 Why would you have Livingston go over Immokalee instead of the other way around?? 3/26/2021 4:33 PM 313 Please make one improvement at a time 3/26/2021 4:27 PM 314 Because it is similar to a local road, it might be easier for our senior drivers to adjust to, as 3/26/2021 4:22 PM well as the rest of us. 315 1 think the entire Livingston road should have these overpasses. 3/26/2021 4:09 PM 13/73 IMMOKALEE ROAD CORRIDOR CONGESTION STUDY PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT SURVEY 316 Would be better if overpass was for immokalee road going over livingston. Immokalee has 3/26/2021 3:52 PM more traffic and would benefit from not having a traffic light on the overpass. 317 Seems like it could work. Good idea 3/26/2021 3:48 PM 318 looks like an improvement. 3/26/2021 3:37 PM 319 1 have used the AirportPulling/Golden Gate often. This is a good option. 3/26/2021 3:24 PM 320 It would make more sense to have the overpass for the Immokalee traffic instead of the 3/26/2021 3:21 PM Livingston traffic! It seems the traffic concerns are ON Immokalee and not on Livingston. 321 N/A 3/26/2021 3:17 PM 322 The traffic is on Immokalee Rd. How much traffic is really on Livingston? 3/26/2021 3:17 PM 323 It will not be pretty but I support it 3/26/2021 3:13 PM 324 Overpass would be great 3/26/2021 3:07 PM 325 Yes, this would be a great idea!!!!! 3/26/2021 3:06 PM 326 Needed 3/26/2021 3:04 PM 327 Works. Rey well at GG and Airport 3/26/2021 2:59 PM 328 Similar to Airport and Golden Gate I believe, seems to work there. 3/26/2021 2:48 PM 329 The Golden Gate Pkwy/Airport-Pulling approach seems to work pretty well so I think they 3/26/2021 2:45 PM could do the same at this overpass. 330 As a resident of Carlton Lakes, there is no safe way to exit from main gate or back resident 3/26/2021 2:41 PM gate, to go south on Livingston. The overpass will negate a break in traffic flow to allow one to cross over Livingston to go south, especially from the back resident gate. A very scary, dangerous crossing every time as it is now. Could sensor lights be installed at the Carlton Lakes Blvd back gate which is also across from the main Delasol community entrance. It is a horror show waiting to happen at that crossroad location. Many accidents and near accidents are already happening there. 331 Especially bad during season, but always congested. Double right turn lane onto Immokalee 3/26/2021 2:12 PM would be better. 332 1 think it's an excellent suggestion! 3/26/2021 2:01 PM 333 This is perfect 3/26/2021 1:55 PM 334 Excellent idea 3/26/2021 1:44 PM 335 The County continues to allow construction of apartment buildings, shopping, retail, hotels 3/26/2021 1:35 PM along Immokalee and Livingston, in spite of neighbor and residents complainants that such (1) are in violation of the Land Development Code and Zoning Laws and (2) will bring too much traffic on roads that are already at capacity and failing. Then, the County miraculously finds that the neighbors are wrong and that there is plenty capacity for additional traffic and approves the project. Thereafter, just a few months after approving those projects, the County tells us that our roads are failing and that we will be required to live between two large over and underpasses to accommodate more cars, more noise, more pollution and an utter destruction of our neighborhoods, walkability, bike ability and quality of life. 336 Why would Immokalee road not be the one to overpass Livingston to keep the traffic on 3/26/2021 11:44 AM Immokalee flowing? 337 Excellent idea. I drive the Golden Gate/Airport intersection with some regularity. 3/26/2021 9:46 AM 338 Stop overdevelopment. 3/26/2021 9:45 AM 339 should not be the first choice - this intersection backs up only because of 1-75 and congestion 3/26/2021 8:31 AM east of 1-75 340 Looks great. Love the Golden Gate/Airport configuration and look forward to seeing that plan 3/26/2021 7:06 AM implemented here. 341 Add a double decker overpass with one for Immokalee also. 3/26/2021 3:41 AM 14/73 IMMOKALEE ROAD CORRIDOR CONGESTION STUDY PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT SURVEY 342 None 3/25/2021 8:18 PM 343 Never had a problem with livingston at immokalee even when going to seed to table on a busy 3/25/2021 8:18 PM day. I like the implementations. 344 1 think this is a bit overkill for this particular intersection. Collier Blvd and Immokalee Road 3/25/2021 4:09 PM would be a better place to do this, if it isn't already planned. 345 1 think it is a great idea 3/25/2021 3:34 PM 346 It seems to work at GGP and APR but is there really adequate space for that type of 3/25/2021 3:26 PM overpass? 347 1 don't believe this is necessary on Livingston. The overpass should be connecting immokalee 3/25/2021 3:02 PM since that is the high traffic road. 348 If it will be similar to the Golden gate overpass then that is great. 3/25/2021 1:15 PM 349 Can't you do the overpass on Immokalee Road (E-W traffic). It seems like that is the higher 3/25/2021 1:15 PM volume road. 350 Will access to STT be worse, better or same.... Don't make it worse please 3/25/2021 1:06 PM 351 Looks good. 3/25/2021 12:36 PM 352 Only modification in the overall study that might actually ease traffic significantly on 3/25/2021 12:34 PM Immokalee Road in my humble opinion. 353 Agree a right turn lane would reduce congestion significantly. 3/25/2021 11:08 AM 354 This makes good sense to me. 3/25/2021 10:01 AM 355 The overpass is a great solution to congestion at this intersection. 3/25/2021 9:55 AM 356 1 like this option but backup also takes place at the Walmart light. Need to better coordinate 3/25/2021 9:32 AM lights. 357 This is perfect. Lots of turn lanes will allow better flow of traffic. 3/25/2021 9:03 AM 358 Any improvement is great - but don't forget all of Immokalee Road - from 951 to 41. The 3/25/2021 8:36 AM problem is all the developments planned east of 951 that will use Immokalee Road - the villages planned between Ave Maria and 951 will have a huge impact - please keep the Rural Stewardship design in mind. 359 The lights are so poorly timed from Goodlettsville Frank, Airport, and The Lane, that all hope is 3/25/2021 8:33 AM lost by the time you get to Livingston. This study needs to start at 41 and go out to clients if you want to solve the root causes of the congestion. Additionally, why would livingston be raised? Immokalee should get the free flow from that, just like golden gate does over airport. 360 stop all the damn construction and maybe we do not need shit like this 3/25/2021 8:25 AM 361 This isn't the main problem. Waste of taxpayer money because the problem is mostly at the 3/25/2021 8:23 AM 175 interchange. 362 What? You've got it backwards! Make Immokalee pass over Livingston. Like the intersection 3/25/2021 8:22 AM of Summerlin Rd and San Carlos Blvd in Ft Myers. Immokalee needs more flow, Livingston has plenty. 363 Sounds great!!! 3/25/2021 8:16 AM 364 It's congested turning left onto immokalee towards 75, triple lanes could help but the bumper to 3/25/2021 7:22 AM bumper and constant cut offs from people not paying attention will just cause more fender benders, please add marking and signs to identify turning lanes back from the intersections 365 What about going east to west with the overpass? That was most of the traffic on Immokalee 3/25/2021 6:33 AM road wouldn't have to stop. 366 agree 3/25/2021 6:24 AM 367 Good plan 3/25/2021 6:09 AM 368 Think this is a great idea. Immokolee between Logan and Livingston is an absolute nightmare 3/25/2021 5:50 AM 15/73 IMMOKALEE ROAD CORRIDOR CONGESTION STUDY PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT SURVEY to travel between! I avoid it at all cost if I can. 369 Yes. 3/25/2021 3:08 AM 370 Sounds good 3/24/2021 10:42 PM 371 Please do it 3/24/2021 10:38 PM 372 If this works like the intersection of Airport Road and Golden Gate Parkway, I believe this will 3/24/2021 9:46 PM help. More volume of traffic is able to move especially if Immokalee Road is the raised road. 373 What about Heritage greens neighborhood. We can not exit because of traffic. Help us!!!! If 3/24/2021 9:26 PM you do an overpass we taking more risks exiting, someone is going to be seriously injured here. With the school next to our exit and the light a exit, there is an accident almost daily. 374 Consideration should be given to the traffic SB from Livingston turning East on Immokalee 3/24/2021 8:27 PM Road. The proposed changes will not keep traffic from blocking this insect ion but may further the issue since through traffic will be of no consequence to those stopped in the intersection to avoid having to wait out the light. This is a potential hazard to Emergency Vehicles as well at present. While it is exaggerated during season it still a problem during the off season. Proactive measures should be taken in consideration of the new housing developments under and slated for construction on the North side of Livingston Rd. 375 Agree 3/24/2021 8:13 PM 376 While this may improve traffic it sure will Miami'fy, Naples! 3/24/2021 8:06 PM 377 1 don't think the problem is going to be relieved with Livingston having an overpass over 3/24/2021 7:51 PM Immokalee Rd. The problem is making the right or left turn off of Livingston onto Immokalee Rd. The first problem is the light at the preserve and Juliet Blvd next problem is the lights at 75. Traffic is backing up on Immokalee Rd because of the North Bound ramp for 75 especially during peak hours! I'm not convinced spending money on a flyover is the best alternative for this problem. I think further studies need to be done! 378 Seemingly works well Golden gate and Airport 3/24/2021 7:45 PM 379 1 think this would be helpful but I am worried about what traffic would be like while the overpass 3/24/2021 7:34 PM is being built. 380 This seems reasonable. Side note, there is also concern with traffic heading north on 3/24/2021 7:24 PM Livingston where the new GGG high school will be built, that can get very heavy during 5 o'clock rush hour 381 This would be great, as long as it handles the heavy merging traffic in during rush hours. 3/24/2021 7:10 PM Please take that into account 382 1 think the issue is more about the northbound, right turn than going north. The traffic north of 3/24/2021 7:01 PM immokalee will still bottleneck by Mediterra, south of Bonita Beach Road. 383 1 feel like this would be great for Immokolee road congestion at that light. I feel like Livingston 3/24/2021 7:01 PM road isn't overly busy but it might make Immokolee drive more smooth. 384 1 think this would be very helpful 3/24/2021 7:00 PM 385 Good idea 3/24/2021 7:00 PM 386 Overpass 3/24/2021 6:18 PM 387 No 3/24/2021 5:56 PM 388 Support recommendation 3/24/2021 5:48 PM 389 Makes sense 3/24/2021 5:34 PM 390 An overpass would help tremendously! 3/24/2021 5:33 PM 391 Construction takes a long time but may be worth it 3/24/2021 5:12 PM 392 Pedestrian Bridge across Livingston for S2T traffic. 3/24/2021 5:08 PM 393 Naples had a personality. You destroyed it with over building. 3/24/2021 4:41 PM 16/73 IMMOKALEE ROAD CORRIDOR CONGESTION STUDY PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT SURVEY 394 In favor of this improvement. 3/24/2021 4:38 PM 395 No 3/24/2021 4:22 PM 396 Hopefully it won't be ugly. It would be nice to make it easier to get in and out of Seed to Table. 3/24/2021 4:11 PM 397 1 like it. 3/24/2021 3:56 PM 398 I'm not sure the expense is worth it. More problems further out on Immokalee Rd. 3/24/2021 3:38 PM 399 For all: this study is at least three years behind in dealing with traffic on these roads. Too little 3/24/2021 3:31 PM too late!! 400 This does not address the THOUSANDS of folks at Seed To Table and their need to head 3/24/2021 3:28 PM South or East. 401 Sounds very expensive. 3/24/2021 3:26 PM 402 Yes, complete this asap or you will have residents began to leave the area. Major major traffic 3/24/2021 2:38 PM accidents, frequent dangerous bus stops letting children off on the corners of immokalee and livingston. already waiting 3-4 light changes to go east on immokalee 403 It might help keep things moving. But will it make it hard to get into the stores? 3/24/2021 2:34 PM 404 1 don't see how this will help to convey east/westbound traffic more efficiently. It would seem 3/24/2021 2:22 PM that the overpass should be east/west over Livingston, like GG Parkway over Airport. 405 Do it. 3/24/2021 2:16 PM 406 Great idea 3/24/2021 2:14 PM 407 Need a way to take a left turn out of Seed to Table in lieu of a u-turn in heavy traffic off 3/24/2021 2:08 PM Livingston or Immokalee. 408 It seems to make accessing Seed To Table more difficult and dangerous than it already is. 3/24/2021 2:00 PM Suspect that maybe one of the objectives. 409 That intersection definitely need some work. I think the overpass would be a great idea 3/24/2021 2:00 PM 410 Looks pretty good. 3/24/2021 1:53 PM 411 No 3/24/2021 1:40 PM 412 No. 3/24/2021 1:38 PM 413 If leaving seed to table and trying to go east on immokalee road will you be able to turn left at 3/24/2021 1:32 PM the intersection? Right now you have to come out and go north on Livingston, make a u turn, and then take a left at the light. Not sure how that will work with the change 414 NB traffic on Livingston making R onto Immokalee gets backed up. Is there space for 2 right 3/24/2021 1:12 PM turn lanes? 415 1 oppose this 3/24/2021 12:26 PM 416 Strongly oppose this. If anything, the overpass should go East to West on Immokalee road, 3/24/2021 11:51 AM not North to South. 417 So far, I like the idea of a Livingston Rd. overpass. n The triple turn left lanes on Livingston 3/24/2021 11:29 AM good idea as there is almost always a backup, any time of year but especially in season or if 75 has had an accident. Also, the added turn left lanes from Livingston going north are good - the single lane to turn left onto Immokalee is woefully inadequate. 418 Sounds good, but minimize construction delays and complet4 the project quickly. 3/24/2021 11:06 AM 419 You still have traffic lights at Walmart area.. I don't think this will ease overall congestion in 3/24/2021 10:35 AM area 420 1 like it. Currently the traffic backup at Livingston and Immokalee is becoming untenable. There 3/24/2021 9:57 AM are times when it takes 2-3 cycles of the light just to continue straight on Livingston. 421 Good suggestion 3/24/2021 9:54 AM 422 Smart. 3/24/2021 9:42 AM 17/73 IMMOKALEE ROAD CORRIDOR CONGESTION STUDY PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT SURVEY 423 My suggestion is to put roundabouts along immokalee road.stop lights make it very hard for 3/24/2021 9:40 AM people to get out of their neighborhoods. I live in Heritage Greens and it's a nightmare to get out because traffic stops and blocks our gate. I've waited upwards of 12 minutes to exit my neighborhood before. 424 1 would hope that a sound/visual barrier wall be constructed on top of the berm north of the 3/23/2021 7:01 PM canal between the canal and condos on Deerfield Way and Cedar Springs Drive in Carlton Lakes. A new auto dealership and residential development is going to be built on Immokalee Road (south side of road) between Livingston and Juliet Blvd. Immokalee Road noise is almost unbearable now. With the addition of the auto dealer, residential development, proposed additional turn lanes unto Livingston, widening of Strand Blvd with additional lanes and a bridge with additional turn lanes it will be near disastrous to our immediate community in Carlton Lakes. I spend 4-5 months annually on Deerfield road directly across from the expected Germain Lexus dealer. I anticipate home values in the area will plummet. I would like to know when this plan will actually become reality so residents can determine what they would like to do with their property. 425 No 3/23/2021 5:51 PM 426 The traffic will be greatly changed and many more cars are expected on the roadway with all 3/23/2021 7:39 AM the approved building. Stop the congestion! 427 This is needed 3/23/2021 6:32 AM 428 Sounds great! 3/22/2021 6:25 PM 429 How does it affect the business on the NE corner? 3/22/2021 6:18 PM 430 This might work if a traffic signal would be installed at the Delasol and Carlton Lakes 3/22/2021 3:56 PM intersection. The traffic from the overpass would overwhelm Livingston without that traffic control. 431 1 am a full-time resident of Carlton Lakes and approve this SPUI at Livingston/Immokalee. 3/22/2021 3:12 PM Please consider easy entrance/exit to/from Carlton Lakes on Carlton Lakes Blvd. for residents of this Community. Thank you. 432 Very good idea. Need to ensure there is access to Carlton Lakes Blvd when travelling 3/22/2021 2:28 PM northbound and going over the overpass. 433 Yes , it's badly needed especially with seed to table on the corner of Livingston and 3/22/2021 2:27 PM Immokalee road. All the cars come out and pour onto Livingston going north and flip around ! It's a dangerous situation! 434 will Carlton Lakes Blvd be north or south of the entrance to this SPUI Overpass? 3/22/2021 2:26 PM 435 1 like the idea but question out the exit from carlton lakes will work. At least now, we merge 3/22/2021 2:24 PM with north bound, then line up to u turn to go south. Not ideal but allows us to do each one at a time. Please take note of the volume of traffic coming out of StoT. 436 1 would think you would want it the other way around. Have Immokalee go over Livingston. The 3/22/2021 11:59 AM goal here is to get Immokalee traffic to move/flow better. Either way, I am all in favor for ANY improvements to traffic flow on Immokalee. 437 looks like a good idea 3/22/2021 10:39 AM 18/73 IMMOKALEE ROAD CORRIDOR CONGESTION STUDY PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT SURVEY Q2 1-75 Interchange: The proposed improvement is a Diverging Diamond Interchange (DDI).For reference, there is a similar Diverging Diamond Interchange located at 1-75 and University Pkwy., Exit 213, in Sarasota County. There is one in progress at 1-75 and Colonial Blvd., Exit 136, in Fort Myers. Have you driven through one? Yes No I don't know 0% 10% 20% Answered:739 Skipped:90 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES Yes 49.66% No 37.35% 1 don't know 12.99% TOTAL # DO YOU HAVE ANY COMMENTS REGARDING THIS RECOMMENDATION? DATE 1 Love them. They are very easy to maneuver. 7/2/2021 5:50 PM 2 You should stop approving all this building in collier county in North Naples. The traffic is 6/9/2021 1:08 PM already a nightmare. Why are you continuing to add to the problem. This is just a band aid. 3 This doesn't appear to impact residential areas around this diverging diamond. What is this 6/1/2021 7:36 AM supposed to provide? It looks complicated. 4 Yes.... Planning commision always seems to follow developers. Not the other way. Unfortunate. 5/25/2021 5:36 PM 5 1 think that before that is considered, a light should definitely be installed at the north gate. It's 5/25/2021 9:16 AM an "accident waiting to happen " , likely a death. I have folks who won't come to see me due to the fact that getting across Livingston Road is so dangerous. 6 This is ridiculous. I have been on University Drive. 5/18/2021 7:17 AM 7 It cut down congestion in the city where I used it but required adjustment by the drivers. It may 5/17/2021 8:12 AM be difficult for all of the elderly drivers in Collier. 8 Confusing 5/16/2021 10:09 AM 9 1 for see many accidents due to people driving in the wrong direction. 5/3/2021 5:57 AM 367 276 96 739 19/73 IMMOKALEE ROAD CORRIDOR CONGESTION STUDY PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT SURVEY 10 Too many disadvantages. Very confusing especially with so many older drivers. 5/2/2021 10:11 AM 11 1 do not believe this is going to resolve the issue and will only cause further confusion and 4/29/2021 2:07 PM slow -downs. 12 1 do use exit 136 as I go to BJ's warehouse. But it takes forever to get off the exit. 4/29/2021 4:07 AM 13 Sarasota interchange works perfectly and keeps traffic flowing smoothly. 4/28/2021 7:31 PM 14 1 hear tHat the design is an improvement. 4/28/2021 3:22 AM 15 Not sure 4/27/2021 4:46 PM 16 As long as it's not confusing . Most of the transient drivers are on vacation and drive as such . 4/27/2021 4:35 PM Most cannot handle a simple round about. 17 1 live here, I can get use to it, however, snow birds, I can see a lot of problems with them not 4/27/2021 2:14 PM being able to handle it. 18 1 am in full support of this measure. 4/27/2021 11:48 AM 19 We definitely need something to move traffic along Immokalee Rd in all directions and getting 4/27/2021 11:07 AM on 1-75. 20 Yes! Do it! Fast! 4/27/2021 10:58 AM 21 Bad idea, too confusing to change sides of the road 4/27/2021 10:00 AM 22 This looks like a peculiar solution that only a traffic engineer rather than Naples drivers are 4/27/2021 9:52 AM likely to love. The unfamiliar is just as dangerous to life and limb as crowded conditions. Drivers experiencing this kind of configuration for the first time are truly dangerous, and unlike many places where there is create congestion, this intersection with continually have new drivers exposed to the configuration because of the tourist nature of the community. Don't do weird Things to the traffic flow 23 Big improvement on what we have now. We really need more East/ West roadways if all the 4/27/2021 9:07 AM developments are going to happen in the eastern County. We also ned more North /South roadways East of 175. Lets make the developers of the Eastern County pay for these roads as they are causing the need. 24 You pride yourself on Naples being some quiet oasis. The beaches are so crowded that you 4/27/2021 8:15 AM have to get there mighty early to get on. 25 Better than what we have now, which was poor planning in the first place. 4/27/2021 8:13 AM 26 The answer is a duplication of my previous response. 4/27/2021 8:11 AM 27 This looks dangerous. How have previous implementations of the DDI turned out? We're 4/27/2021 7:38 AM people ok with it? Any increase in accidents? 28 this is also backwards, it is imokolee that needs the traffic relief not livingston. people are 4/27/2021 6:38 AM trying to get to the interstate from imokolee that is the issue, not people traveling nb or sb on livingston 29 This looks unnecessarily complicated and confusing. I don't understand what I'm seeing in the 4/26/2021 9:29 PM diagram - how does one drive straight on Immokalee without getting on or off 75? 30 How is this any different from what is there now ? 4/26/2021 7:54 PM 31 The overpass might be better here. 4/26/2021 7:37 PM 32 What I hate is that every Florida on ramp interchange is different. You never know which side 4/26/2021 4:26 PM to get on to get on the highway. Florida needs to pick one style and make them all the same. 33 1 would hope And entrance and exit could be put further east to 1 75. That is where most of the 4/26/2021 3:56 PM traffic is coming from and I'm sure those residents would like the convenience of not having to come all the way down here to get on 75 34 Looks like a nightmare of confusion. The people driving around down here have enough issues 4/26/2021 3:47 PM making a common turn - hence that shocking number of rollovers, head-ons, etc. This looks way too challenging for the average Naples driver. 20 / 73 IMMOKALEE ROAD CORRIDOR CONGESTION STUDY PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT SURVEY 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 I believe it helps the congestion in these areas. 4/26/2021 2:23 PM Not same demographic in Naples. You have multiple senior drivers and this is going to be very 4/26/2021 1:53 PM difficult for them to navigate. Wow. This really changes the character of North Naples. 4/26/2021 1:52 PM Quite confusing 4/26/2021 1:01 PM It looks quite confusing to me the way the lanes seem to go on to the other side of the road 4/26/2021 12:12 PM under 75. With all the older people who vacation here they already drive on the wrong side of the road, this seems very confusing. It looks awesome and should keep that traffic Flowing well. Will it be too difficult for the elderly 4/26/2021 10:25 AM seasonal drivers to follow or will the signs and pattern of the road be easy? Much needed improvement in this area. Traffic is congested in this area. 4/26/2021 9:10 AM We do not want to become like ft Meyers. It is so congested there going any direction. We are 4/26/2021 8:31 AM starting to look just like that. This recommendation is excellent! The lanes going head on would never work her, our Population is too senior in age„they are too 4/26/2021 7:59 AM confused normally Good idea 4/26/2021 7:52 AM People unfamiliar with the travel lanes will take time trying to understand where they are. This 4/26/2021 7:50 AM was a big issue in Sarasota/Bradenton at University Ave. Can be confusing, but then, some folks still don't understand traffic circles..... 4/26/2021 7:43 AM No comment 4/26/2021 7:26 AM This makes my head spin. I don't understand it. Why move EB traffic to the WB lanes only to 4/25/2021 9:16 PM move them back again? Same for moving WB traffic to EB lanes and back, all within a matter of a few hundred feet. Very confusing if you are not used to the configuration. Also cars speed up through them 4/25/20214:35 PM making it more difficult for cars not used to the interchange. Traffic backs up. It takes at least half an hour to get through 4/25/20214:32 PM No 4/25/2021 4:14 PM doesn't look very user friendly or straight forward ... appears complicated with long signal lights 4/24/2021 5:41 PM Sounds good but do not add stoplights 4/24/2021 4:28 PM Tried the one in Sarasota once. The concept is excellent. Although one time is insufficient, if 4/24/2021 6:52 AM Sarasota would do it again, that recommendation is sound. Support. may work. 4/23/2021 6:18 AM I support this proposal. 4/22/2021 8:55 PM Yes, the DDI is the most effective and efficient traffic control solution for the Immokalee/75 4/22/2021 6:41 PM Intersection and lengthening all turns lanes. This is the worst intersection. Get this done right away. 4/22/2021 3:22 PM Good plan, congestion is bad. Thanks- 4/22/2021 12:57 PM Ride through both roadways weekly Immoklee by far the worse one. 4/22/2021 11:00 AM I would say it is confusing at first, however I am assuming over time people get used to it and 4/22/2021 9:49 AM it works better at keeping traffic flowing. Keeps traffic moving but a lot of people unfamiliar on how to drive through it 4/22/2021 3:41 AM Looks great 4/21/2021 9:37 PM Really unsure, have not used to have an opinion. No comment 4/21/2021 6:24 PM Again, the quicker we move people through an intersection, the greater the distance people will 4/21/2021 4:53 PM 21/73 IMMOKALEE ROAD CORRIDOR CONGESTION STUDY PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT SURVEY 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 W commute. It's a never ending problem. Anhything to increase the flow is helpful. 4/18/2021 12:12 PM These can be a nightmare until you have gone through one repeatedly. So many lanes and 4/16/2021 12:44 PM choices. Our Naples residents and visitors have an older demographic and have difficulty in one lane rotaries never mind this! I use the 75 interchange a few times per week and I find no issue warranting a drastic change! 4/16/2021 11:31 AM No, but I heard this has helped in Sarasota. 4/16/2021 7:43 AM I have driven this type of interchange up north. I am not sure how well it would work in a 4/15/2021 7:52 PM community with many seniors and many tourists. Not at this time 4/15/2021 12:01 PM A diamond interchange will not solve the problem. A cloverleaf interchange is needed to keep 4/14/2021 1:12 PM traffic flowing. Is there room for 3rd turn lane coming off 75 to make left turn either east or westbound? I was 4/12/2021 5:38 PM going to recommend the DDI as I have driven the one in Sarasota many times and it is efficient. I think it will help a little bit. 4/12/2021 11:32 AM Noticed it is confusing for snowbirds and alot of people almost go to the right into incoming 4/12/2021 9:55 AM traffic. Excellent proposal 4/12/2021 9:26 AM This can be incredibly confusing for elderly drivers, who are not accustomed to modern traffic 4/12/2021 8:04 AM resolutions. That is my only concern. signage and road arrow painting will be critical with this type of change -- and considering 4/12/2021 8:01 AM factors such as seasonal visitors, short term visitors, and the percentage of older drivers. The flow as depicted appears to offer a significant improvement. That should help congestion on Immokalee Road going through. It is always a hassle to go 4/12/2021 7:59 AM east or west under 1-75 Not going to work if the building doesn't stop East of Immokalee Rd and 951. Too many 4/12/2021 6:55 AM people. Good idea, training will be needed. Should elevate backlog 4/11/2021 9:48 PM feels a little strange at first but you get used to it. The diverging diamond was in St, Cloud, MN 4/11/2021 7:10 PM It looks good but some people can't do a normal road. This could be an accident waiting to 4/11/2021 5:47 PM happen LOTS OF CONFUSION FOR A WHILE! 4/11/2021 2:30 PM Another good proposal. 4/11/2021 1:45 PM Concur 4/11/2021 12:47 PM It seems to make sense. 4/11/2021 12:30 PM How does this help traffic flow? 4/11/2021 11:06 AM Rather have the overpass on Immokalee rd. 4/11/2021 10:36 AM Can you start building it tomorrow? 4/11/2021 10:04 AM I travel this route twice a day 5 days a week. Largest issue I see is when 1-75 northbound is 4/11/2021 10:03 AM backed up results in additional drivers existing on Immokalee Rd. thus adding to bottleneck for both east and westbound Immokalee travel. The preponderance of traffic lights between Logan and Livingston are currently backing the 4/11/2021 9:56 AM traffic up to standstills so that triangle design doesn't change that. The traffic that doesn't enter 175 and remains east or westbound on Immokalee rd will still increase and back up at the existing lights. 22 / 73 IMMOKALEE ROAD CORRIDOR CONGESTION STUDY PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT SURVEY 93 Bad idea. Won't make a difference. 4/11/2021 8:13 AM 94 If this recommendation reduces confusion and increases traffic flow, because waiting for lights 4/11/2021 8:03 AM to change in the heat is not fuel efficient. 95 Love these intersections. They keep traffic flowing on and off the Interstate and they decrease 4/11/2021 7:36 AM the number of places an accident can occur. Will definitely help with rush hour on and off of 75. My only concern is when 75 may have lots of traffic, the intersection maybe get extremely congested. I haven't driven through one that has been busy though so this may never happen. 96 Should help 4/11/2021 6:51 AM 97 Terrific. I have used the one in Sarasota. 4/11/2021 6:26 AM 98 What about a simple cloverleaf where all ramps on to highways are to the right. Also for 4/11/2021 6:17 AM immediate relief take away the left hand turns on to 75. 99 Need to eliminate on -ramp lane drop. This is a major source of congestion. There are presently 4/11/2021 5:47 AM 4 lanes of traffic that converge into (ultimately) ONE on -ramp onto 1-75 North. 100 Have not had good experiences with these. 4/11/2021 5:32 AM 101 STUPID! Cloverleaf designs need NO traffic lights and keep traffic moving much better! 4/11/2021 5:31 AM 102 Any improvement is needed 4/11/2021 1:13 AM 103 It's OK, not great. Still don't understand why you didn't do the four leaf clover design that was 4/11/2021 12:38 AM originally planned 10 or 15 years ago. That clover design doesn't have ANY traffic cross oncoming lanes to exit or enter 175 thus keeping everything flowing more fluidly without needing green lights to cross over stopping oncoming traffic. 104 1 believe it would be very confusing to certain individuals, causing accidents & further 4/10/2021 9:26 PM congestion. 105 The lights longer especially at the Strand and Immokalee Road 4/10/2021 8:47 PM 106 No 4/10/2021 5:55 PM 107 1 think this would be a great solution. Once people drive through a diverging Diamond, it 4/10/2021 5:51 PM becomes second nature. Collier residents will pick it up quickly. 108 The main issue is westbound lanes going North on 175. Traffic backs up to Logan or further 4/10/2021 5:36 AM daily without an accident. EMS/Fire are hindered exiting the station on Immokalee by Logan. The northbound traffic heading West has to flow continuously or have a dedicated lane. The room exists for barriers or a flyover. 109 This won't help 4/8/2021 9:32 PM 110 No 4/8/2021 5:44 PM 111 Good solution. 4/8/2021 3:26 PM 112 Sounds good 4/8/2021 8:34 AM 113 1 think a jug handle/clover leaf interchange is more suitable. It would potentially eliminate 2 4/7/2021 9:02 PM traffic lights. In my opinion eliminating as many lights as possible without compromising safety would be beneficial. 114 these types of intersections take some "getting use to" the first few times you drive thru them. 4/7/2021 9:34 AM It would be helpful if there would be an informative communication as what to expect. Maybe a TV or Radio commercial, etc. 115 Seems the best alternative to keep traffic moving from all directions. 4/7/2021 7:27 AM 116 No 4/6/2021 9:22 PM 117 Yes my husband was part of the exit 213 paving crew! Those are not typical for Florida with 4/6/2021 9:16 PM the amount of tourists we have yearly. Make it difficult for them and us native born collier residents lose that $$$ they bring yearly!! 118 Anything would help!!! It's horrible in season. 4/6/2021 8:46 PM 23/73 IMMOKALEE ROAD CORRIDOR CONGESTION STUDY PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT SURVEY 119 If it helps divert traffic off Immokalee I am in favor it. 4/6/2021 2:55 PM 120 These are pretty intimidating. I think it may create confusion rather than help. And when some 4/6/2021 1:17 PM people get confused they just stop dead in traffic! 121 1-75 should have been 8-12 lanes when last increased to 6 lanes. 4/6/2021 1:12 PM 122 Good Idea 4/6/2021 9:41 AM 123 This is a new concept for me and very challenging to drive on what traditional is the wrong side 4/6/2021 9:36 AM of the road I could learn to navigate an intersection like this but I'm not sure other Florida drivers could. My observation is that many Florida drivers have trouble driving in a straight line. 124 As long as the entry ramps would no longer be controlled by stop lights it would be a vast 4/6/2021 9:09 AM improvement... it is the back up at the lights that cause horrible traffic even at 6:30 AM 125 Yes please do it! 4/6/2021 8:53 AM 126 Traffic backup at the Sarasota interchange is horrendous. 4/6/2021 8:52 AM 127 This will help, but the way back original plan to clover leaf. East bound traffic on Immokalee at 4/6/2021 8:47 AM 75 going North would not needed a left turn to get on 75, This would eliminate a lot of issues getting on 75. There is still room to do this. The cost may be a issue. 128 1 support the proposal. 4/6/2021 8:14 AM 129 Anything to relieve this traffic congestion! 4/6/2021 8:06 AM 130 Too complicated and overdone for a suburban area 4/6/2021 7:10 AM 131 Not sure how they work, but if it can keep traffic flowing more freely I'm for this. 4/6/2021 4:36 AM 132 Isn't there one on Golden Gate Pkwy and Airport Road? 4/6/2021 4:15 AM 133 Too much traffic 4/5/2021 11:20 PM 134 Yes do it 4/5/2021 8:42 PM 135 Makes perfect sense 4/5/2021 7:18 PM 136 Sorely needed. 4/5/2021 7:18 PM 137 Sometimes these clever engineering feats are a nightmare and look good on paper, but do not 4/5/2021 7:10 PM function well or are inefficient. We need alternate routes to get traffic off of Immokalee Rd. in addition to these plans. 138 Not sure 4/5/2021 7:00 PM 139 Requires a conscious adjustment to navigating more typical traffic flow. 4/5/2021 6:48 PM 140 It will simplify the process of moving vehicles thru the interchange. 4/5/2021 6:22 PM 141 This design seems to work very well in Atlanta to relieve congestion wherever it has been 4/5/2021 3:15 PM implemented. Drivers down here might be very confused at first though 142 This feels like one of the longest lights in the County. This plan sounds good in theory, but will 4/5/2021 2:17 PM the snowbirds really be able to maneuver it without causing mass chaos? 143 We need more lanes exiting Immokalee on to 175N. That traffic backs up all the way past 4/5/2021 2:10 PM Logan during evening rush hour or we need more entrance ramps merging into 175. 144 YES! Again, needed!! 4/5/2021 2:03 PM 145 1 would hope this would help with the traffic flow for those cards traveling west on Immokalee 4/5/2021 1:57 PM and trying to merge unto 75 north. This interchange is at total deadlock at 5:00 and there is always an accident so that cards traveling north on 75 are backed up to Vanderbilt Rd. 146 It seems to have increased efficiency in Sarasota county. 4/5/2021 1:46 PM 147 works well 4/5/2021 11:51 AM 148 Please do it! Do ANYTHING!! 4/5/2021 11:40 AM 149 STOP DEVELOPING EAST 4/5/2021 11:35 AM 24 / 73 IMMOKALEE ROAD CORRIDOR CONGESTION STUDY PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT SURVEY 150 None 4/5/2021 11:23 AM 151 It's going to confuse a lot of the drivers, especially those who are already a bit confused 4/5/2021 11:00 AM 152 They are very effective in reducing traffic in heavily traveled intersections. 4/5/2021 10:53 AM 153 1 like it. 4/5/2021 10:23 AM 154 This will only be of minimal help to reduce traffic! 4/5/2021 9:58 AM 155 They have them in the Melborne area and people I have spoken with that use them are 4/5/2021 9:43 AM thankful they are there 156 If you improve the flow here and not at the Livingston interchange you will have a backup to 4/5/2021 9:30 AM this intersection westbound at multiple times during the day. 157 Stay focused, and there's no problem. We may need additional signage for the population that 4/5/2021 9:24 AM cant read. 158 These DDI seem to be effective, but not enough experience to provide a definitive decision. 4/5/2021 7:03 AM 159 Do it and the above. Improve signal timing of the Eastbound and Westbound signals at The 4/5/2021 7:00 AM Strand and Juliet Lane, that is a major tie up. Also, improve the Southbound exit from The Strand to have a dedicated Westbound (right) turn lane 160 Once you drive you love it. It is easy to drive and move through the interchange 4/5/2021 6:25 AM 161 These can be really confusing. I wonder how elderly and seasonal drivers will fare. 4/4/2021 9:56 PM 162 Not exactly sure what this is. 4/4/2021 7:12 PM 163 Definitely needed to alleviate the traffic jams at Immokalee and 175 and Livingston and 4/4/2021 12:38 PM Immokalee 164 We need a solution to this area of congestion 4/3/2021 3:43 PM 165 1 have used several locations in Ohio. It works very well. 4/3/2021 11:17 AM 166 Looks dangerous. Why don't you build an Immokalee expressway from Livingston to Logan 4/2/2021 5:26 PM that runs above the current roadway. That way vehicles not going to Target, Walmart , the Strand or 1-75 can sail past these exits rather than wait in traffic for ages. 167 Traffic flow will definitely be enhanced by this exchange 4/2/2021 5:05 PM 168 Good option for congestion relief with the thru flow of Immokalee but without the expansion of 4/1/2021 9:19 PM the canal bridges just north of this intersection and the construction of a dual merge lane onto NB 1 75 the back ups along the far north WB lane of Immokalee will not see any relief. The demand for NB 1 75 access causes traffic in the far right lane of WB Immokalee to frequently back up beyond Palazzo Drive. The addition of the combination turn/thru lane along the north side of Immokalee will help with WB thru traffic along Immokalee but the juggling for position to access NB 1 75 will not change. 169 Make sure it is well marked, they can be a bit confusing. Old folks down here may create 4/1/2021 7:39 PM issues. 170 Dumbest idea ever thought of and executed. Traffic is horrible, more accidents, more confused 4/1/2021 1:47 PM drivers who stop causing many accidents. Impossible to navigate in the rain or the holiday season. Add in the 2-3 years of construction making more traffic problems. Not sure why they continued with others. My daughter lives and works in Sarasota. Every patient that comes in late into her office complains about the traffic. 171 1 like it! 4/1/2021 12:35 PM 172 Confusing at first but if you go with the flow, traffic seems to move well. 3/31/2021 8:13 PM 173 Driven through one in St. Louis. It works well 3/31/2021 6:53 PM 174 I'm not in a position to dispute the wisdom of creating a Diverging Diamond Interchange, but 3/31/2021 5:30 PM frankly I'm very confused by it. Perhaps consider educating the public on how and why this works? 175 Need more lanes when on 75 exiting exit 111. Traffice backs up on 75. 3/31/2021 12:51 PM 25/73 IMMOKALEE ROAD CORRIDOR CONGESTION STUDY PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT SURVEY 176 Given the ... ahem ... demographic of the average Naples resident, I worry that this might be 3/31/2021 12:12 PM too confusing and complex. 177 1 used to live on Lakewood ranch and have seen how well this works. 3/31/2021 11:09 AM 178 Might be confusing to some. 3/31/2021 10:43 AM 179 How fast can this get done? Sooner is always better. Construction would have to take place 3/31/2021 9:29 AM 24-7 to get this done. I like it though. 180 Seems like an expensive project - does the traffic volume warrant it? 3/31/2021 8:46 AM 181 Do not see benefits of this and think it's confusing 3/31/2021 7:47 AM 182 Would be Better than it is now! 3/31/2021 7:19 AM 183 Looks confusing. Is it safe? 3/30/2021 3:39 PM 184 Anything that will speed up the traffic flow is good! 3/30/2021 1:23 PM 185 Would significantly help congestion at this interchange. 3/30/2021 1:09 PM 186 This approach works very well. I recommend it 3/30/2021 12:45 PM 187 doesn't appear to offer much relief 3/30/2021 11:43 AM 188 To confusing for seniors 3/30/2021 9:40 AM 189 1 am very much in favor of it. 3/29/2021 8:44 PM 190 These are very dangerous intersections. People cant even turn without going the wrong way. 3/29/2021 6:10 PM 191 No 3/29/2021 6:06 PM 192 If this facilitates through traffic (i.e. traffic not accessing 1-75) 1 am for it. 3/29/2021 12:22 PM 193 Not in favor 3/29/2021 8:20 AM 194 Need a lot of clear signage and educating drivers! 3/28/2021 11:00 PM 195 Do not fully understand concept 3/28/2021 10:31 PM 196 DDI's can be very confusing, and result in delays. 3/28/2021 8:05 PM 197 Disagree. 3/28/2021 8:05 PM 198 I'll try anything to alleviate traffic, I avoid this intersection by any means necessary 3/28/2021 7:30 PM 199 Very confusing and awkward. Would rather see overpass over 1-75 for traffic heading east on 3/28/2021 6:19 PM Immokalee Road. Make the left lane (fast lane) so that people wishing to go east on Immokalee can exit while keeping the original exit for those going west on. This would help with the congestion in the slow lane on 1-75. 200 It should work 3/28/2021 5:11 PM 201 This doesnt seem to be an efficient design to move the many trucks, trailers and cars through 3/28/2021 4:52 PM the heavily traveled interchange. 202 Anything to ease the flow of traffic at 1-75 and Immokalee will help 3/28/2021 4:18 PM 203 Crazy expense how long do you think this will be out dated and rebuilt again? 3/28/2021 4:15 PM 204 None 3/28/2021 4:00 PM 205 How long does this take 3/28/2021 3:58 PM 206 This could help. 3/28/2021 3:29 PM 207 1-75 and UniversityParkway. Terrifying! If you ever opt for something like this educate the 3/28/2021 2:47 PM public on local news media how to drive. We did not learn roundabouts and diverging diamond interchanges in Drivers Ed!! 208 The suggestions for Logan and Livingston would probably help but the real problem is the 1-75 3/28/2021 1:59 PM on and off ramps. The county needs to consider another access to 1-75 off Vanderbilt Beach 26 / 73 IMMOKALEE ROAD CORRIDOR CONGESTION STUDY PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT SURVEY Road. I understand there will be objections from the communities of Village Walk and Wilshire Lakes but it's clear to those if us who live off Immokalee Road this is necessary. This is something that's long overdue. Also the redesign on Immokalee road at Oakes Blvd. and Valewood Drive years ago did not help the situation. 209 Looks complicated, clear signs needed and notice given to earlier which lane to be in. 3/28/2021 1:27 PM 210 A good idea! 3/28/2021 11:28 AM 211 Had them in IL. Confusing to navigate. I would forsee issues w the older and the out of town 3/28/2021 11:27 AM driver. 212 Timing of existing signals is poor 3/28/2021 11:16 AM 213 1 believe I've just used cloverleafs like at Goldengate. Do those help? What do the studies 3/28/2021 10:30 AM show? 214 Connect the city of Immokalee to 75 to get the giant dump trucks and landscaping trucks off of 3/28/2021 8:36 AM Immokalee Rd. Also, create new roads that connect to Immokalee Rd. so you can get off to Vanderbilt Beach quicker. 215 Bad idea. 3/28/2021 8:23 AM 216 1 love this concept, but to be earnest, people are already confused as drivers in this region. If it 3/28/2021 8:18 AM is smooth, it would be exceptional, and the best solution would be one that cuts down on the need for excess stop -and -go traffic signals. 217 Do it 3/28/2021 7:47 AM 218 Seems safer and a cost-effective measure. 3/27/2021 10:43 PM 219 Go forward with the plans. 3/27/2021 8:46 PM 220 Looks very confusing for a first timer in the dark 3/27/2021 8:03 PM 221 1 like the ideal. 3/27/2021 7:46 PM 222 This would be great. 3/27/2021 6:44 PM 223 Love The Idea 3/27/2021 6:01 PM 224 1 moved from KC, and these are used in Lenexa, KS. It takes a moment to get used to the 3/27/2021 5:32 PM traffic pattern, but then it works great. Another area that definitely needs improvement. 225 Great idea! 3/27/2021 4:56 PM 226 The old people and visitors would be a nightmare driving on this setup as they go the wrong 3/27/2021 1:53 PM way head on to traffic on just regular streets that contain medians.) 227 See above 3/27/2021 1:35 PM 228 Looks more accident prone. 3/27/2021 11:04 AM 229 1 sincerely believe that the only way to resolve issues on 1-75 is for the State and County to 3/27/2021 10:35 AM allot enough $$ to purchase land and install FULL CLOVERLEAFS. This would eliminate 2 traffic light intersections that today address 4 way traffic. 230 Not a fan, confusing. Light timing would be an improvement 3/27/2021 10:09 AM 231 Possible solution. How long will it take to get built?? Are we looking at 5 years down the road 3/27/2021 9:38 AM to complete all studies, permits, approvals and actual construction?? 232 This would likely slow and not improve traffic flow. 3/27/2021 8:59 AM 233 Again I hope this doesn't mean 5 years of construction 3/27/2021 8:09 AM 234 1 definitely think that would help. 3/27/2021 7:57 AM 235 Hopefully this will work to change Immokolee 3/27/2021 7:08 AM 236 Fine improvement! 3/27/2021 6:23 AM 237 This is way better than current roads now! On ramp to 1-75 north needs to be 2 lanes from east 3/27/2021 5:29 AM 27 / 73 IMMOKALEE ROAD CORRIDOR CONGESTION STUDY PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT SURVEY side along with two lanes from west side. Build a bridge on the canel to access this. It will relive the congestion. Also you need to extend 951 to Bonita beach road as this will funnel everyone from the estate that are traveling north to Lee county away from this intersection which will drastically relieve the congestion. 238 1 support this if it will reduce the traffic in this location. 3/26/2021 10:27 PM 239 1 go to UTC mall (Sarasota) at that intersection a lot. I freak out at that exit. There are lots of 3/26/2021 9:49 PM OLD people in Florida who are disoriented and confused while driving... and they take meds and drink too. I'm an excellent 49 year old driver and still get confused —you end up driving on the wrong side of the road. It's not that well marked. Not a good plan. Please NO000000!!!!!!!! I live at this exit!!!! 240 It's gotta be better then what's there now. 3/26/2021 8:23 PM 241 STOP the new developement!!!! roads are out of control NOW. 3/26/2021 7:33 PM 242 looks unusual and dangerous. 3/26/2021 7:22 PM 243 This should be the last project. Most people using Immokalee are full time and live close by. 3/26/2021 6:56 PM 244 The diagram shown seems to suggest no improvement to the ramps to 75. Since the problem 3/26/2021 6:30 PM is east -west on Immokalee (especially west bound Immokalee onto northbound 75) because of ramp back up, not clear how this could really help 245 What was once a residential area is going to no longer be so. 3/26/2021 5:40 PM 246 Strongly recommend 3/26/2021 5:00 PM 247 It was very unsafe and accidents all of the time. Not looking forward to the one on colonial! 3/26/2021 4:59 PM 248 Good idea. 3/26/2021 4:54 PM 249 Looks good. 3/26/2021 4:50 PM 250 This may work. And have motorist not wait forever at traffic light 3/26/2021 4:38 PM 251 Looks very awkward and complicated. 3/26/2021 4:33 PM 252 While probably the biggest impact, this will take awhile for seniors and snowbirds to adjust to, 3/26/20214:22 PM and they've taken forever to finish the one at Colonial. Also, the speeds that drivers get up to on Colonial are not comparable to immokalee, and I'm not referring to the speed limit. If you grew up here you know what I mean! 253 If it's proven to help - we should do it. Even if the public is concerned about confusion. 3/26/2021 4:09 PM 254 1 don't like it, confuses older drivers 3/26/2021 3:48 PM 255 If it will speed up traffic I'm all for it! 3/26/2021 3:37 PM 256 1 dont know how this would improve the flow. 3/26/2021 3:37 PM 257 Alot of the problem is people wanting to get on 75. Would another exit/entrance to it help? 3/26/2021 3:26 PM 258 1 do not like this type. Extremely large area with difficult lines of vision. 3/26/2021 3:24 PM 259 1 don't see how this alleviates traffic. It only diverts it differently and in doing so will confuse 3/26/2021 3:21 PM the elderly population here and cause more accidents. 260 N/A 3/26/2021 3:17 PM 261 Not sure what this would do. 3/26/2021 3:17 PM 262 Support it 3/26/2021 3:13 PM 263 DDI 3/26/2021 3:07 PM 264 Good idea!!! 3/26/2021 3:06 PM 265 They work pretty well 3/26/2021 3:04 PM 266 Would this back up traffic coming off of 75 in either direction under the bridge? 3/26/2021 2:48 PM 267 If it would reduce traffic I would be in favor of it. 3/26/2021 2:01 PM 28/73 IMMOKALEE ROAD CORRIDOR CONGESTION STUDY PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT SURVEY 268 Not sure I understand how this would help. 3/26/2021 1:55 PM 269 Definitely need a sound barrier wall to protect established communities such as Strand from 3/26/2021 1:44 PM increased lane traffic. 270 Very difficult and relatively dangerous, especially when there is heavy traffic 3/26/2021 1:35 PM 271 These are very confusing and very noisy. How are you going to protect communities from the 3/26/2021 1:35 PM excess cars, their noise and pollution. This is getting out of hand. Are you going to install noise barrier walls and tress along communities that are within a mile of these intersections at 1-75? 272 Certainly not necessary at Immokalee and Livingston Road intersection!!! 3/26/2021 1:27 PM 273 Yes, it looks like a nightmare of construction issues that will make driving on Immokalee 3/26/2021 12:30 PM impossible. 274 Looks complicated the old people wouldn't figure it out 3/26/2021 11:44 AM 275 1 hate the idea of more construction at this intersection but I think it's an improvement 3/26/2021 9:46 AM 276 People here can't drive a straight line on simple, wide, level roads. 3/26/2021 9:45 AM 277 It's a good idea, but the older crowd will hate it, just like roundabouts. Note I am 65 but I am 3/26/2021 8:31 AM OK with this. We have a few near where I live in Michigan and they work well if designed abd marked well 278 The older population and tourists that travel from the United States and abroad will not be able 3/26/2021 7:41 AM to figure this out. This is a disaster waiting to happen. Full time residents will be able to adapt but it's to much when you have as many tourist as Naples does. 279 Yes. Had the pleasure of driving through the first one ever built in Chicago and like it a lot. 3/26/2021 7:06 AM They work. 280 Worried the elderly and some other drivers will be confused. Would work great otherwise. 3/26/2021 3:41 AM 281 1 like this just hope the construction would not be done during season. 3/25/2021 8:18 PM 282 This may be the correct answer 3/25/2021 8:18 PM 283 Traffic situation will not be rectified until the onramp for northbound 1 75 is extended so that 3/25/2021 8:07 PM people can get on and get merged. That will probably require an enlargement of the bridge over the Cocohatchee River. Until you do this nothing will improve because of the congestion backing up trying to merge onto the interstate 284 Unfortunately most people have difficulty following traffic signals, staying in lanes and 3/25/20214:09 PM navigating the north Naples area in general. I cannot even imagine what this configuration would do ..... U 285 do it 3/25/2021 3:34 PM 286 Why are we not putting minimum lot sizes on new developments in order to control traffic 3/25/2021 3:26 PM volumes? 287 This will be way too confusing for the general population and the older community. 3/25/2021 3:02 PM 288 1 have family in Sarasota and I drive through the University diamond frequently. It does help 3/25/2021 1:15 PM although the format is very confusing when driving thru (I am 28 y/o) - so I imagine elderly traffic thru this diamond could cause some concerns. I have no idea how much it helps in the end or if there are any real accident concerns. 289 It flows well once people are used to it. Signage is important. 3/25/2021 1:15 PM 290 1 think the elderly people will be really confused.... But it will help the interchange move better. 3/25/2021 1:06 PM 291 Don't see how this helps anyone other than those wanting to exit and reenter i75 in the 3/25/2021 12:34 PM opposite direction. It seems you would still have lights stopping those on Immokalee to accommodate those exiting i75 in either direction to enter Immokalee road and that's what causes the current back ups - not anyone trying to reenter the interstate in the opposite direction. 29 / 73 IMMOKALEE ROAD CORRIDOR CONGESTION STUDY PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT SURVEY 292 We need entries/exits off of 1-75 on Vanderbilt Beach RD. This would greatly reduce the 3/25/2021 11:13 AM volume on Immokalee and Pine Ridge Rd. We could also greatly use frontage roads along 1-75. Almost all major cities have them, yet we don't here in Lee/Collier counties. 293 1 found this confusing in the one at 1-75 and University Pkwy, x 213 referenced above. 3/25/2021 10:01 AM 294 My concern is driver confusion. Yet, something needs to be done since the right lane 3/25/2021 9:55 AM (westbound Immokolee) for northbound 75 is often backed up to Logan in the mornings. 295 Drove through one on 195 at Yulee exit. It worked well. 3/25/2021 9:32 AM 296 This will allow better flow of traffic when entering/exiting the highway. Would recommend 3 3/25/2021 9:03 AM lanes to enter the highway that would mimic the 3 lanes exiting the highway. We already have 2 lanes to enter the highway and it's not enough. 297 Lots of driver education and good signage will be needed. 3/25/2021 8:45 AM 298 looks confusing but if it works that is great - this area needs help now! 3/25/2021 8:36 AM 299 There are too many tourists and old people down here for that type of intersection. I am under 3/25/2021 8:33 AM 40 and found it confusing in sarasota. I do think it works, but would be dangerous for naples. Also, you skipped any suggestions for juliet... without including that timing and layout in your study, that whole cluster will continue. People slow to a crawl before getting in the left turn lanes, and the turn lights and crosswalks are all sequential, making Juliet a very problematic intersection. That slowdown is then exacerbated at 75 where you are guaranteed to miss the light due to the previous intersection. Coming from the west, juliet causes the same issues with the continuous right turn from the 75 exit into the publix plaza (poorly signed, people cut in last minute) plus people cut over to the left for the walmart left turn, making it a scramble of cars. 300 only idiots would build too many houses before having a plan to deal with the increased traffic 3/25/2021 8:25 AM 301 This is the area to improve and would support any design that allows traffic to flow again 3/25/2021 8:23 AM 302 1 think this would be incredible. I'm very familiar with the one at University Pkwy. 3/25/2021 8:22 AM 303 Can be very confusing... for visitors and elderly 3/25/2021 8:16 AM 304 Very Confusing - How does this improve traffic flow? 3/25/2021 7:53 AM 305 Good concept 3/25/2021 6:09 AM 306 Please do it 3/24/2021 10:38 PM 307 As someone who has a part-time home in Naples, this intersection is a necessity. With 3/24/2021 10:21 PM excessive traffic in season and the volume of senior citizen drivers and people from out of state who are unfamiliar with the excessive speeds, lack of medians separating opposite lanes of traffic and confusing turn lanes, I strongly encourage you to simplify this plan or at minimum, provide plenty of signage in advance of the interchange. Sadly, I lost my father to a car crash in Naples. Safety is more important, when dealing with these congestion issues. 308 By the model it looks like traffic is moved with more cars at once. The turn offs to the 75 look 3/24/2021 9:46 PM well in place for continued traffic 309 With intersections so close to 75 and multi -named (The Strand/Juliet & Northbrook/Tarpon 3/24/2021 9:42 PM Bay) you will need notations in the lanes to assist OOT drivers. 310 Never used this set up but their has to be a better way for cars to get up to speed faster on to 3/24/2021 9:37 PM 75. This interchange gets backed up because it's takes way to long to merge onto 75. Slow the growth and new building past 951 before you figure this out might also help. 311 Not the answer to residents with only one exit from the Heritage Greens Community new will 3/24/2021 9:26 PM never be able to exit 312 1 like the idea however would like to understand the extended wait time. I can only imagine the 3/24/2021 8:38 PM accidents as people speed through 313 Why not do one of the continuous circle loops where traffic entering and exiting 1-75 never has 3/24/2021 8:06 PM to stop as it can flow freely? 314 100% this would do wonders once people grow accustomed to it 3/24/2021 7:10 PM 30 / 73 IMMOKALEE ROAD CORRIDOR CONGESTION STUDY PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT SURVEY 315 It worked well for us in Lexington, Kentucky. Alleviated congestion, allowing traffics to flow 3/24/2021 7:05 PM smoothly, and reduction in accident. 316 Reducing the traffic one light should help. 3/24/2021 7:01 PM 317 Looks good! 3/24/2021 7:01 PM 318 1 don't understand from the diagram what would change and how it would positively impact the 3/24/2021 6:37 PM traffic flow 319 1 hope this works. I avoid this area as much as I can even though it's the most direct route. 3/24/2021 5:56 PM 320 It looks very confusing, especially at night! 3/24/2021 5:33 PM 321 Might make it safer 3/24/2021 5:12 PM 322 Anything to reduce backup on exit 111 South should be a priority. 3/24/2021 5:08 PM 323 People use Vanderbilt to get off on Immokalee and 951 now. It will only get worse. 3/24/2021 4:41 PM 324 Takes some getting used to. Will probably have to field a lot of complaints from motorists who 3/24/20214:38 PM profess not to understand it. Actually, more efficient than it looks at first glance. 325 No 3/24/2021 4:22 PM 326 Seems like a good idea. Drove a DID in Michigan, odd the first time, but it worked well. 3/24/2021 4:11 PM 327 Like it. 3/24/2021 3:56 PM 328 It's hard to figure out the first few times. Different from what everyone is used to. 3/24/2021 3:38 PM 329 A better explanation of this concept is required and details provided to residents and seasonal 3/24/2021 3:31 PM on how to traverse, otherwise I see it being a real stop point. 330 Even with the projected efficiencies of the DDI, this only addresses the short term needs. A 3/24/2021 3:28 PM plan for the longer term is still needed. 331 They are very confusing! 3/24/2021 2:43 PM 332 Complete asap 3/24/2021 2:38 PM 333 Love it 3/24/2021 2:34 PM 334 It works fine. It's a little strange at first, but really no problem. 3/24/2021 2:26 PM 335 It's great. 3/24/2021 2:16 PM 336 Great idea 3/24/2021 2:14 PM 337 DDI's work great and would definitely cut down on congestion! 3/24/2021 2:01 PM 338 It was confusing and very congested. Especially for tourists and visitors. 3/24/2021 2:00 PM 339 This looks like it would create more accidents than it would prevent. Immokalee rd has enough 3/24/2021 1:53 PM deaths and traffic delays from vehicle crashes on a straight road, and now you're going to add crossovers traffic to a head on collision? 340 It looks a bit confusing but I think eventually people would learn to use it. We have a high 3/24/2021 1:49 PM population of elderly people and I think things with twist and turns are going to be hard for them. 341 can the proposed hardscaped medians (grey hatch) be converted to additional 3/24/2021 1:40 PM greens pace/pervious? 342 No 3/24/2021 1:38 PM 343 These are confusing. Also the impact to traffic during construction is a major concern. 3/24/2021 1:12 PM 344 Drivers do not pay attention in this area. This looks very confusing and could result in more 3/24/2021 11:51 AM accidents. 345 If I understand the concept presented, We had something similar to this back in Columbus, 3/24/2021 11:13 AM Ohio (Sawmill Road). It made a huge difference and was well -received. 31/73 IMMOKALEE ROAD CORRIDOR CONGESTION STUDY PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT SURVEY 346 VERY confusing. Accidents waiting to happen. 347 With the elderly in this area.. I can only see constant accidents with this plan 348 Something's got to give - do something fast! 349 1 can't see how to go SIB on 175 if you are traveling West on Immokalee... this style intersection is confusing to me. 350 Highly recommend! Used one in Georgia at the intersection of 1 85 and Pleasant Hill Road in suburban Atlanta. 351 1 like it but I think our residents and seasonal residents may have issues navigating it. 352 This is terribly confusing and my chief concern is how this will effect the Carlton Lakes northern entrance/exit. It is incredibly difficult to get out of that exit with the amount of vehicles that speed up and down Livingston Road. Now that they will be zooming right across an overpass at Immokalee Road it will be even more difficult and increasingly dangerous. This is true especially for vehicles exiting Carlton Lakes and trying to get across Livingston Road with traffic speeding north and south on Livingston Road and dealing with vehicles making turns into and out of Delasol. There have already been fatalities at that site and countless near misses. 353 Too confusing 354 Design works. 355 1 live near the I-75/lmmokalee interchange, and would recommend not removing the traffic light for 1-75's South -then -West bound traffic ... it looks like it has been omitted from this drawing. Ditto the same recommendation for 1-75's South -then -East bound traffic lane traffic light that appears to have been omitted. 356 1 have heard they work well. 357 That's s00000 confusing and our population is too old and too many visitors would never be able to comprehend it .lives could be lost ! 358 Whatever gets rid of a few lights I'm for! 359 1 like it. 360 1 have heard these work well 3/24/2021 11:06 AM 3/24/2021 10:35 AM 3/24/2021 10:26 AM 3/24/2021 9:57 AM 3/24/2021 9:49 AM 3/24/2021 9:42 AM 3/23/2021 1:15 PM 3/22/2021 6:25 PM 3/22/2021 3:56 PM 3/22/2021 3:12 PM 3/22/2021 2:28 PM 3/22/2021 2:27 PM 3/22/2021 2:24 PM 3/22/2021 11:59 AM 3/22/2021 10:39 AM 32 / 73 IMMOKALEE ROAD CORRIDOR CONGESTION STUDY PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT SURVEY 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Q3 Logan Blvd. and Immokalee Rd. Intersection: The proposed recommendation is a Partial Displaced Left Turn (or Partial Continuous Flow Intersection). For reference, there is a similar Partial Displaced Left Turn intersection located at Daniels Pkwy. and State Rd. 82, in Lee County. Do you have any comments regarding this recommendation? Answered:264 Skipped:565 RESPONSES DATE I don't know what that is. 7/2/2021 5:50 PM Logan needs to be made wider all the way to Vanderbilt Beach rd. 5/25/2021 5:36 PM Is this a longer left turn lane? I am in favor of that. 4/30/2021 9:22 PM Not familiar with this type of CFI so unable to provide comments. 4/29/2021 2:07 PM I suggest the people looking into this should drive it constantly at different times of the day to 4/29/2021 4:07 AM get their own take Immokalee road is failing. Development east of 951 should be put on hold. 4/27/2021 5:29 PM None 4/27/2021 4:46 PM It's probably a good idea 4/27/20214:35 PM This area is a congested nightmare 4/27/2021 11:59 AM I am in favor of this design solution. 4/27/2021 11:48 AM Not familiar with this type of intersection; however, if it will improve flow of traffic then it is 4/27/2021 11:07 AM needed. Do it 4/27/2021 10:00 AM Unable to figure out what this looks like. Unusual usually equals unsafe. 4/27/2021 9:52 AM Better then what is there now. 4/27/2021 9:07 AM Stop building! Take some of the traffic off Immokalee by extending the road behind the Strand 4/27/2021 8:15 AM for a new exit or extend the road down by Marbella Lakes. this is a decent proposal and might alleviate some congestion on imokolee 4/27/2021 6:38 AM No comment. 4/26/2021 9:29 PM Help!!!!! You need to do something to help traffic congestion there. It's almost too late!! 4/26/2021 5:22 PM NO NO NO... that is so dangerous. We have too many visitors and old people.That will cause 4/26/2021 4:26 PM more problems. I do not have a recommendation for this. It's above my pay grade but I must say I don't want 4/26/2021 3:56 PM my area to look anything like Fort Myers. That scares me more than all the traffic in the world No more lights. The ones on there are not maintaining a flow of traffic. 4/26/2021 3:56 PM No comment. 4/26/2021 3:47 PM Please check with the feds regarding 175 we have heard that the plan is to widen the interstate 4/26/2021 3:35 PM through exit111 We live in The Strand now but are 42 year residents of Collier county. This is not a bad idea but I would prefer the diverging diamond interchange as a better solution. 4/26/2021 2:23 PM Once again, will be too confusing for the challenged senior drivers. You want to see if this will 4/26/2021 1:53 PM 33 / 73 IMMOKALEE ROAD CORRIDOR CONGESTION STUDY PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT SURVEY 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 work at this location? Put a few 70-85 year olds in cars at night and have them naviage a mock-up of this proposal. Have been thru the one at Daniels, that one also works well. You are trying to improve traffic flow but you cannot succeed at that by adding more development and more cars. Stop developing. Do it. Yes it is a great proposal and one which I thought was happening long ago. Left turn ONLY lasigyt needed Helpful Left turn to go N on Logan will cross Immokalee further to the W? Aside from confusing people, how much will this configuration improve things? And what if you miss your turn? Rather than looking at increasing the road traffic, consider whether the development causing the traffic is part of a Master Plan. Don't put the "cart before the horse". No Again, I'd be up in arms over noise control and depreciating property values if I lived in the affected residential neighborhoods. Irresponsible comprehensive planning on the part of Collier Commissioners approving all these new Eastern developments. How can these new village approvals be called fiscally neutral when the taxpayers are faced with this??? Just don't add stoplights. Eliminate them. Interesting. As a rule do not like adding lights, but appears the three lights are synced. Have not been at Daniels and SR82. Will check it out. How much traffic will this bring to Logan Blvd. would need to a simulation of the flow of traffice for this. hard to picture how this works. Stop permitting new developments east of Collier. It is causing too much congestion. Yes, good solution that should be implemented asap. Just wait for overpass solution. I live off Logan and would rather see less traffic on the road. I wonder if this displaced left turn would make Logan more attractive to use and thus increase traffic. No comment Again, moving people quickly is not the answer. Looks like another very, very confusing solution. I am not in that area often enough to know if this would be beneficial for that intersection. No. I am not familiar with this term or type of intersection. I do not find this intersection to be too busy right now. No I'm not sure I understand how this one works. A video showing how traffic flows through an intersection like this would probably be better. Yes do it! Excellent proposal Do not agree with this proposal. I have used the Daniels Parkway intersection and it is horrible. The recommendation seems to be a short term solution with an acknowledgement of an overpass at a later date. Why spend the money for an interim solution when we know Stone Creek is still building; we know Oaks is still building (and there is a pending study for connectivity of certain roads to Logan and/or Oaks Blvd, and we know the construction East of 4/26/2021 12:49 PM 4/26/2021 9:39 AM 4/26/2021 8:31 AM 4/26/2021 7:59 AM 4/26/2021 7:26 AM 4/25/2021 9:16 PM 4/25/2021 4:35 PM 4/25/2021 4:14 PM 4/24/2021 5:41 PM 4/24/2021 4:28 PM 4/24/2021 6:52 AM 4/23/2021 7:02 AM 4/23/2021 6:18 AM 4/23/2021 4:28 AM 4/22/2021 6:41 PM 4/22/2021 3:22 PM 4/22/2021 9:49 AM 4/21/2021 6:24 PM 4/21/2021 4:53 PM 4/16/2021 12:44 PM 4/16/2021 11:31 AM 4/16/2021 7:43 AM 4/15/2021 7:52 PM 4/14/2021 1:12 PM 4/12/2021 11:32 AM 4/12/2021 9:55 AM 4/12/2021 9:26 AM 4/12/2021 8:04 AM 4/12/2021 8:01 AM 34 / 73 IMMOKALEE ROAD CORRIDOR CONGESTION STUDY PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT SURVEY 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 il 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 Logan is at break neck speed -- rather than undertake the overpass solution now. I suspect this will require additional consideration of access points to Logan Landing shops, but would seem to show more forethought and avoid having to do this twice in a relatively short period of time. (I do not believe that this will not hit critical mass much sooner than expected given the work East of Logan). Lights East and West bound lanes should longer. It's a 6 lane road compared to two and four 4/12/2021 6:55 AM lanes. Good for through traffic, learning curve 4/11/2021 9:48 PM This would be good 4/11/2021 5:47 PM Concur 4/11/2021 12:47 PM No 4/11/2021 11:54 AM It would help to provide data on how this would help. 4/11/2021 11:06 AM Yes great 4/11/2021 10:36 AM Shorten stop light times. 4/11/2021 10:03 AM I'm sure it would help! 4/11/2021 8:25 AM Logan and Immokalee has just become worse with increased slow traffic flow. This looks 4/11/2021 8:03 AM better. Because what is there is not effective for traffic volume. The main focus for this completion should definitely be in the west bound direction. Kids and 4/11/2021 7:36 AM parents leaving school from Gulf Coast and Laurel Oak and going home live on Logan cause the most traffic during end of school hours. Yes do what you can to make the traffic better at this intersection 4/11/2021 7:13 AM Yes. I like this too. Logan Blvd would also need to be widened to 4 lanes from Immokalee 4/11/2021 6:26 AM Road to Bonita Beach Road. Good idea but lower priority 4/11/2021 5:47 AM Good idea. 4/11/2021 5:32 AM Don like that idea at all it makes for dangerous driving promoting more aggressive driving. 4/11/2021 12:38 AM They also use that pattern on east bound lanes on Alicia Rd. Both Daniels& Alicia have to many people cutting drivers off trying to jump the line and get in last second. Also since Naples keeps it's beauty restricting overhead signage, unfamiliar drivers don't figure out which lane they need to be in to make turns until it's too late at these PCFI I believe it would confuse some individuals 4/10/2021 9:26 PM Coming east on Immokalee Road to Logan Blvd you need a longer turn lane 4/10/2021 8:47 PM Get rid of the stop signs at old cypress entrance that shouldn't be there to begin with. Traffic 4/10/2021 7:06 PM backs up heading north all the way to immokalee rd. Not sure that will help. 4/10/2021 5:55 PM It appears the turns signals are only for turning left. If that is not the case do not add anymore 4/10/2021 5:36 AM traffic signals on Immokalee Rd. I do not believe this schematic represents either a significant change or improvement. 4/9/2021 2:18 AM Hardly will help 4/8/2021 9:32 PM No 4/8/2021 5:44 PM Sounds good 4/8/2021 8:34 AM I would add another overpass here. So this interchange never gets as bad as Livingston and 4/7/2021 9:02 PM immokalee. No 4/6/2021 9:22 PM This is horrible idea. Have any of you actually driven the Daniels and 82 intersection? 4/6/2021 9:16 PM 35 / 73 IMMOKALEE ROAD CORRIDOR CONGESTION STUDY PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT SURVEY 83 Good idea! 4/6/2021 8:46 PM 84 Excellent idea 4/6/2021 6:49 PM 85 Agree 4/6/2021 2:55 PM 86 Not really sure how this would work, ut they should try to keep it simple. 4/6/2021 1:17 PM 87 Don't know what you're talking about. Don't see what's wrong with intersection now. It's too 4/6/2021 1:12 PM bad ROADS aren't considered before the ==== County approves all the developments. Development East of Collier Blvd will only make matter so much worse. Has county increased impact fees for all the developments to pay for the road improvements? 88 The light at Logan and Immokalee needs to remain green longer North and South bound. There 4/6/2021 12:52 PM is so much traffic and I've seen so many cars run the light. Also, the left turn heading southeast should be longer during the school year. There are many cars again who do not want to wait so they suddenly cut right, go straight and make a u-turn by Logan Landing. 89 Do it ... PLEASE 4/6/2021 9:09 AM 90 This will help getting into Logan Landings and the flow thru this intersection. This would really 4/6/2021 8:47 AM help when the High School and Elementary school gets out at 3 and 4PM. A light at Saturnia Lakes would break up the traffic and allow people get out of the communities at Saturnia and Heritage Greens. It is impossible to get out of these communities at rush hour in morning and late afternoon. At times the actual backup is all the way back to Collier Blvd 91 In support of proposal. 4/6/2021 8:14 AM 92 our nice suburban neighborhoods will be ruined by all these road lanes 4/6/2021 7:10 AM 93 Keeping traffic flowing with minimal delays is important. 4/6/2021 4:36 AM 94 Anything will help. 4/5/2021 10:42 PM 95 No comments 4/5/2021 9:07 PM 96 Better than nothing 4/5/2021 8:42 PM 97 Makes sense 4/5/2021 7:18 PM 98 Needed especially in season. 4/5/2021 7:18 PM 99 Anything to keep traffic moving. Immokalee Rd. has become a disaster to travel since more 4/5/2021 7:10 PM development to the East has occurred over time. This corridor is our only access to 175 and the beaches to the west, but Immokalee Rd. can no longer handle the current amount of traffic in this area. 100 Not sure 4/5/2021 7:00 PM 101 No. 4/5/2021 6:48 PM 102 Not sure this is needed just yet, but it would be nice to proactive vs wait until it's a problem to 4/5/2021 3:15 PM address it 103 1 think Logan is the least problematic. Everything backs up from the slowdown at 175. Not to 4/5/2021 2:32 PM say Logan doesn't need improvement 104 That intersection never seems to be a problem for me now, but I could see it getting more 4/5/2021 2:17 PM congested as time goes on. The Partial Displaced Left Turn is a great idea, I just worry that older drivers wouldn't be able to figure it out. 105 The problem is traffic backing up both east and westbound on Immokalee, so if this would help 4/5/2021 1:57 PM keep the traffic from getting backed up that would help. 106 very good idea! 4/5/2021 11:51 AM 107 Yes! Do it!! 4/5/2021 11:40 AM 108 STOP DEVELOPING EAST 4/5/2021 11:35 AM 109 Agree with your recommendations 4/5/2021 11:23 AM 110 1 like it. 4/5/2021 10:23 AM 36 / 73 IMMOKALEE ROAD CORRIDOR CONGESTION STUDY PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT SURVEY 111 I see the issue here is after turning south on Logan, traffic in the right lane tries to turn left into 4/5/2021 9:30 AM the shopping center and cuts off traffic in the left lane. Not sure how to resolve that issue. 112 Looks good. 4/5/2021 9:24 AM 113 This helps with traffic flow but also increases risk of accidents. 4/5/2021 7:56 AM 114 the left turn needs to be longer in all directions, keep the big trucks off of logan going north of 4/5/2021 7:48 AM Immokalee -- they get everything backed up from the stop sign on logan into the intersection at immokalee. Also, the light on logan needs to be green longer for traffic crossing both north and south. 115 Yes, improvement would be great 4/5/2021 7:03 AM 116 no 4/5/2021 7:00 AM 117 Additional light at Logan Landing entrance should help. 4/4/2021 9:56 PM 118 none 4/4/2021 12:38 PM 119 Don't understand how this improves the situation 4/2/2021 5:26 PM 120 After driver acceptance and with very clear lane markings, appears to be a viable option for 4/1/2021 9:19 PM congestion relief. 121 You should be addressing alternative traffic solutions or routes further East starting at oil well 4/1/2021 7:39 PM road. We need a bypass or flyover straight to 1-75 122 Have not experienced one but nothing is continuous. Traffic stopped on Immokalee will halt 4/1/2021 1:47 PM any continuous flow onto it. 123 Good idea 4/1/2021 6:48 AM 124 This looks confusing and I worry about the elderly population , which will include me by the 3/31/2021 8:13 PM time this is done, understanding and navigating this kind of intersection. 125 This just seems like an accident waiting to happen..... 3/31/2021 1:53 PM 126 Make Logan 2 lanes north and south. 3/31/2021 1:21 PM 127 Concur 3/31/2021 11:09 AM 128 This intersection was so poorly planned. It's brand new and already too small. 3/31/2021 10:43 AM 129 How fast can this get done? Sooner is always better. 3/31/2021 9:29 AM 130 It doesn't address the issue of volume on Immokalee Road. With all the proposed development 3/31/2021 8:46 AM in the eastern part of the county, this will not solve any issues. Most of the traffic from the east is headed for 175 or the US 41 area, not Bonita Beach Road. Logan Blvd north of Immokalee Road is a single lane road - why does what is essentially a local road need something like this? The trucks on Logan Blvd are the problem, not the left turns. Banning the trucks will cut down on the traffic turning onto Immokalee Road/ Logan Blvd and restrict traffic to residents who live along Logan Blvd or the eastern part of Bonita Beach Road trying to get into Naples. Daniels Pkwy is hardly an example of a well designed road, given the number of accidents. North/South through traffic belongs on 175, not local roads. 131 None 3/30/2021 3:39 PM 132 Should help. 3/30/2021 1:09 PM 133 Change speed limit on Logan to 45 mph both north and south of IMMOKALEE. Extend right 3/30/2021 9:17 AM turn only lanes around the entire intersection. Prohibit ALL commercial truck traffic on Logan north Remove stop signs at Olde Cypress intersection 134 Anything to improve traffic flow. It's very hard to turn left out of Logan landings shopping area 3/30/2021 9:01 AM right onto Logan 135 1 am very much in favor of it. 3/29/2021 8:44 PM 136 No 3/29/2021 6:06 PM 137 looks like the one on daniels parkway and sr82 that works great. 3/29/2021 11:56 AM 37 / 73 IMMOKALEE ROAD CORRIDOR CONGESTION STUDY PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT SURVEY 138 Not in favor 3/29/2021 8:20 AM 139 Do not fully understand concept 3/28/2021 10:31 PM 140 Agree. 3/28/2021 8:05 PM 141 never thought the Logan Immokalee intersection was that bad. It the Traffic Commission more 3/28/2021 7:52 PM than 12 years to get traffic light for the North Naples substation on the South side of Immokalee. That definily helped the respons time of the engine and ambulance stationed there. 142 Looks confusing! 3/28/2021 7:30 PM 143 Do it 3/28/2021 5:13 PM 144 Anything is better than what now in play 3/28/2021 5:11 PM 145 Sounds like a good idea 3/28/2021 4:57 PM 146 The newly opened Logan extension to Bonita Beach Rd has made this intersection more 3/28/2021 4:52 PM dangerous. 147 How long will this be outdated and rebuilt over again? 3/28/2021 4:15 PM 148 I like itl! 3/28/2021 4:00 PM 149 How long does this take 3/28/2021 3:58 PM 150 Whatever will relieve the congestion will be an improvement. Immokalee Rd us just horribly 3/28/2021 3:29 PM congested, either direction, much of the time! 151 Yes 3/28/2021 11:28 AM 152 1 think this is a good idea only if you can keep traffic moving. No help in bumper to bumper 3/28/2021 10:30 AM traffic. 153 I dont understand it 3/28/2021 10:16 AM 154 No 3/28/2021 8:36 AM 155 good idea 3/28/2021 8:23 AM 156 Seems like this intersection was just completely redone and that the initial planning overlooked 3/28/2021 8:18 AM the issue that already existed. Instead of adding turn lanes and traffic signals, the county should consider finding ways for allowing traffic to safely merge without having to disrupt the flow of traffic in areas (particularly around the 1-75 overpass. 157 Do it 3/28/2021 7:47 AM 158 Go forward with the plans. 3/27/2021 8:46 PM 159 This would be great. 3/27/2021 6:44 PM 160 No comments. 3/27/2021 5:32 PM 161 Would rather see an overpass similar to Golden Gates and Airport Pulling. 3/27/2021 4:56 PM 162 No 3/27/2021 1:35 PM 163 Good idea 3/27/2021 11:38 AM 164 Looks more accident prone. Dedicated right turn lanes on east bound Immokalee after signal 3/27/2021 11:04 AM could be helpful. 165 Potential solution 3/27/2021 9:38 AM 166 This looks like less construction than the other two. 3/27/2021 8:09 AM 167 Probably would help. 3/27/2021 7:57 AM 168 no 3/27/2021 7:50 AM 169 Not familiar 3/27/2021 7:08 AM 38 / 73 IMMOKALEE ROAD CORRIDOR CONGESTION STUDY PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT SURVEY 170 1 agree with this decision 3/27/2021 5:58 AM 171 1 strongly support this. 3/26/2021 10:27 PM 172 This definitely should help. 3/26/2021 8:23 PM 173 STOP the new developement! 3/26/2021 7:33 PM 174 no 3/26/2021 7:22 PM 175 Like it. 3/26/2021 6:56 PM 176 Again, the major problem is everyone wanting to go to 75 and places further west - might help 3/26/2021 6:30 PM turning south on Logan - no one is going to use Logan northbound as an alternative to get to northbound 75 without vast improvements to northbound Logan, which even with recent improvements is still a 2 lane roadway 177 This would be somewhat helpful. 3/26/2021 6:19 PM 178 Do it 3/26/2021 5:00 PM 179 Not sure this will help. Traffic northbound on Logan at Immokolee has been horrific!! 3/26/2021 4:57 PM 180 Logan needs to be a wider road of at least 4 lanes. 3/26/2021 4:33 PM 181 Logan Blvd us two lanes Will it be widened to accommodate the extra traffic??? 3/26/2021 4:27 PM 182 If this fixes the merging left turn at Logan where drivers race each other while turning from 3/26/2021 4:22 PM immokalee onto Logan, then it's probably for the best. 183 Adding more traffic lights seems counter intuitive in trying to improve traffic. 3/26/2021 4:09 PM 184 Seems like a good idea 3/26/2021 3:48 PM 185 Confusing - not sure how you turn left onto Logan 3/26/2021 3:37 PM 186 Looks like it could be confusing for the elderly. 3/26/2021 3:24 PM 187 I fail to see how adding more travfic lights will alleviate anything. This seems to alleviates 3/26/2021 3:21 PM Logan traffic as opposed to Immokalee road traffic. 188 N/A 3/26/2021 3:17 PM 189 These seem dangerous. 3/26/2021 3:17 PM 190 Partial Displaced Left 3/26/2021 3:07 PM 191 Anything would help! This is our intersection and it's very dangerous. 3/26/2021 3:06 PM 192 No 3/26/2021 3:04 PM 193 Do not quite grasp this one 3/26/2021 2:48 PM 194 Sounds a possible approach at Logan and Immokalee. 3/26/2021 2:45 PM 195 1 think it's a great suggestion. 3/26/2021 2:01 PM 196 No 3/26/2021 1:35 PM 197 1 live in Olde Cypress and anything to improve traffic flow is welcome! 3/26/2021 9:46 AM 198 Daniels Pkwy is a mess often. Clearly, doesn't work too well there. 3/26/2021 9:45 AM 199 That will help but Logan extension already needs to be widened. This road should have been 3/26/2021 7:41 AM built as a 4 lane road to begin with. 200 Not sure if that will do enough for this intersection going east/west 3/26/2021 3:41 AM 201 Keep the dump Trucks off Logan!!!!!!! 3/25/2021 8:18 PM 202 good idea 3/25/2021 3:34 PM 203 The issue on Logan is the volume of use and speed, the Immokalee / Logan intersection is not 3/25/2021 3:26 PM an issue, is it Logan blvd in both directions and speeders. 39/73 IMMOKALEE ROAD CORRIDOR CONGESTION STUDY PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT SURVEY 204 Way too confusing. 3/25/2021 3:02 PM 205 No comment 3/25/2021 1:15 PM 206 With the increased usage of Logan Blvd, why not utilize an overpass approach on day 1, rather 3/25/2021 1:15 PM than this approach now and potentially an overpass later? 207 Also confusing for elderly maybe.... But I like it. 3/25/2021 1:06 PM 208 The yield that is needed on these partial lanes will not ease traffic on Immokalee - it will cause 3/25/2021 12:34 PM more accidents as people try to gun it to get into ongoing traffic. In California and Washington states, they had to add pacing lights to keep people from doing this in the feed lane system and it was a nightmare. 209 No comment. 3/25/2021 10:01 AM 210 Being a resident of Riverstone, we're experiencing high levels of traffic (high truck usage) on 3/25/2021 9:55 AM Logan Blvd. Not sure if additional lights at this interchange are worth the benefits. 211 Talking to folks who live up in Lee County, this intersection is very confusing the first couple of 3/25/2021 9:32 AM times you drive it. 212 Again, you skipped the target light which is so poorly timed on immokalee that everyone slows 3/25/2021 8:33 AM to stop before it changes. They are also often in the wrong lane due to poor /late signage on the right turn lane that extends from 75 to target. A displaced left turn seems reasonable for the logan intersection, but still fails to address people turning out of the shopping center in front of traffic... people pull out and don't accelerate, cutting off and slowing down traffic in the process. It would be great to have merge lanes for the older folk pulling out so they can get up to speed. The left turns arent really the problem. 213 clearly the county is full of a bunch of idiots 3/25/2021 8:25 AM 214 The Continuous Flow Intersection at Daniels and 82 is excellent. I think this would work well 3/25/2021 8:22 AM here for extra flow on Immokalee rd. 215 Very Confusing - How does this improve traffic flow? 3/25/2021 7:53 AM 216 We need a watch for bicycles in this area, there a lots of kids that ride to and from gulf coast 3/25/2021 7:22 AM high school and adults riding along here as well 217 No comment 3/25/2021 6:09 AM 218 Yes. 3/25/2021 3:08 AM 219 Please do it 3/24/2021 10:38 PM 220 This is a heavy residential area with two 800+ households. Both developments have only ONE 3/24/2021 10:28 PM exit, which are onto Logan. In an emergency, this could be catastrophic especially if traffic is diverted from Immokalee. Please consider this during your planning efforts. 221 With more development in this area plus the additional development at Collier and Immokalee, 3/24/2021 10:21 PM it will undoubtedly bring even more congestion, glad you are planning ahead. 222 The partial displaced turns are great, keeps traffic moving while drivers look only one way. 3/24/2021 9:46 PM 223 This is the intersection where I live (Riverstone). I don't have any problems with the current left 3/24/2021 9:42 PM turn setup. It seems to work relatively well. My biggest problem is exiting Logan in the AM turning right onto Immokalee westbound. An entrance ramp of about 40 yards would be helpful. 224 Remove stop sign at entrance of olde cypress 3/24/2021 9:37 PM 225 Partial continuous flow makes more sense 3/24/2021 8:06 PM 226 Recommendation would help with night or out of season construction to help with congestion. 3/24/2021 7:24 PM 227 1 don't know of the immediate need for this. 3/24/2021 7:10 PM 228 Good idea 3/24/2021 7:00 PM 229 1 don't understand the diagram and how it will impact traffic. 3/24/2021 6:37 PM 230 Not sure what this means. Due to covid, I have not been driving as much as I used to and 3/24/2021 6:33 PM 40 / 73 IMMOKALEE ROAD CORRIDOR CONGESTION STUDY PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT SURVEY don't plan on getting up to 82/Daniels Pkwy. to see the intersection. 231 Looks ok 3/24/2021 6:18 PM 232 No 3/24/2021 5:56 PM 233 Makes sense 3/24/2021 5:34 PM 234 There are constant accidents on State Rd. 82. 1 don't know if it is at the intersection, but it is 3/24/2021 5:33 PM cause for concern. 235 Is this sufficient considering completion of Valencia Trails? 3/24/2021 5:08 PM 236 Great idea 3/24/2021 4:42 PM 237 Anything that will reduce the car races up and down Immokalee Rd would be much 3/24/20214:22 PM appreciated. And of course improvements to traffic flow. 238 1 cannot figure out how this will help. Maybe I don't really understand it. It seems like the left 3/24/2021 4:11 PM turn people have to go through 2 lights to turn left?? This seems like it's going to be a train - wreck and all the tourists and snowbirds will make a mess of it. 239 Like it 3/24/2021 3:56 PM 240 Again, greater explanation is needed to understand. 3/24/2021 3:31 PM 241 1 do not agree with this type of intersection from a life safety perspective. There have been 3/24/2021 3:28 PM noted increases in crashes and fatalities by using these. 242 Going to be an extremely busy intersection. This will probably be too little too late by the time 3/24/2021 3:26 PM it would be finished. 243 1 don't understand this concept 3/24/2021 2:43 PM 244 Excellent, this road is used and major construction and traffic already exists 3/24/2021 2:38 PM 245 How will the recommended improvements for this intersection impact dead-end streets West of 3/24/2021 2:33 PM Logan Blvd. exiting/entering Immokalee Rd? We live in Heritage Greens and its a horror show when we try to enter Immokalee Rd. from Heritage Greens Drive, especially if we want to make a U turn at Preserve Ln. and go Westbound on Immokalee Road. There are several other neighborhoods West of Heritage Greens that are have the same problem with entering Immokalee Road. 246 It appears it will make right turns onto Immokalee Road easier with the merge lanes. 3/24/2021 2:26 PM 247 Do it. 3/24/2021 2:16 PM 248 Great idea 3/24/2021 2:14 PM 249 This does not make sense. There is simply too much development east of this intersection for 3/24/2021 2:00 PM any solution to handle effectively. 250 No recommendation but I do believe Immokalee rd between Logan & Airport is way too 3/24/2021 2:00 PM congested most of the day. Turn lanes are too short for the amount of people turning so it blocks straight lane traffic from moving 251 Westbound Immokalee Rd. traffic should have a better entrance to Logan Landings as 3/24/2021 1:40 PM opposed to forcing them to enter via Logan. 252 No. 3/24/2021 1:38 PM 253 No I think that makes sense 3/24/2021 1:32 PM 254 Is Logan going to be widened south of Immokalee? If not, then I don't see the need for this. If 3/24/2021 1:12 PM so, then this could help 255 Don't understand the concept. 3/24/2021 11:06 AM 256 You just spent a ton of money adding new turn lanes on Logan. If all the dump truck traffic was 3/24/2021 10:35 AM diverted off of Logan the amount of traffic at this intersection would decrease dramatically 257 1 use Logan everyday to travel for work. Leave it. I turn left off immoklee. Livingston is your 3/24/2021 10:11 AM issue and once through Logan intersection. 41/73 IMMOKALEE ROAD CORRIDOR CONGESTION STUDY PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT SURVEY 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 I like it. Roundabout This is just confusing. Ok No No I like it 3/24/2021 9:42 AM 3/24/2021 9:40 AM 3/23/2021 1:15 PM 3/22/2021 6:25 PM 3/22/2021 3:56 PM 3/22/2021 2:24 PM 3/22/2021 11:59 AM 42 / 73 IMMOKALEE ROAD CORRIDOR CONGESTION STUDY PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT SURVEY Q4 How often do you use the study corridor (Immokalee Rd. between Livingston Rd. and Logan Blvd.)? Answered:790 Skipped:39 Every day At least one a wee At least once a month Less than once a month 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES Every day 65.32% 516 At least once a week 27.22% 215 At least once a month 5.06% 40 Less than once a month 2.41% 19 TOTAL 790 43/73 IMMOKALEE ROAD CORRIDOR CONGESTION STUDY PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT SURVEY Q5 How often do you use the intersections within this study area? a. Liv Inte c. Loga Intersection d. One or mo of the Answered:819 Skipped:10 ■ 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Everyday 0 At least once a week E At least once a month Less than once a month 44 / 73 IMMOKALEE ROAD CORRIDOR CONGESTION STUDY PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT SURVEY a. Livingston Rd. Intersection b. 1-75 Interchange c. Logan Blvd. Intersection d. One or more of the following: Strand Blvd./Juliet Blvd., Northbrooke Dr./Tarpon Bay Blvd., Valewood Dr., Oakes Blvd., or Executive Dr. intersections EVERY AT LEAST AT LEAST LESS DAY ONCE A ONCE A THAN WEEK MONTH ONCE A MONTH 59.43% 36.13% 3.33% 1.11% 482 293 27 9 41.25% 46.50% 10.25% 2.00% 330 372 82 16 41.22% 36.13% 14.63% 8.02% 324 284 115 63 52.10% 36.67% 7.90% 3.33% 422 297 64 27 TOTAL 811 800 786 810 45/73 IMMOKALEE ROAD CORRIDOR CONGESTION STUDY PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT SURVEY Q6 Do you live within 1 mile of the study area? Answered:825 Skipped:4 Yes No 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES Yes 66.42% No 33.58% TOTAL 548 277 825 46 / 73 IMMOKALEE ROAD CORRIDOR CONGESTION STUDY PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT SURVEY Q7 Do you work within 1 mile of the study area? Answered:813 Skipped:16 Yes No ANSWER CHOICES Yes No TOTAL 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% RESPONSES 21.28% 78.72% 173 640 813 47/73 IMMOKALEE ROAD CORRIDOR CONGESTION STUDY PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT SURVEY Q8 Do you consider yourself a "Year -Round" or "Seasonal" resident? Year -Round Resident Seasonal Resident... None of the above Answered:823 Skipped:6 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% ANSWER CHOICES Year -Round Resident Seasonal Resident (temporary residence at least 1 month per year) None of the above TOTAL RESPONSES 87.12% 717 12.64% 104 0.24% 2 823 48 / 73 IMMOKALEE ROAD CORRIDOR CONGESTION STUDY PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT SURVEY Q9 How did you hear about the study and survey? Answered:802 Skipped:27 Collier County website Social med E notifica Di notificati 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% ANSWER CHOICES RESPONSES Collier County website 10.85% 87 Social media 51.50% 413 Email notification 9.73% 78 Direct notification from HOA, friend, neighbor, etc.... 27.93% 224 TOTAL 802 49 / 73 IMMOKALEE ROAD CORRIDOR CONGESTION STUDY PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT SURVEY Q10 Do you have any other comments regarding the study? Answered:463 Skipped:366 # RESPONSES DATE 1 Lorraine Lantz has been fantastic with helping me under stand the project better and explaining 7/2/2021 5:50 PM what exactly is going to happen. At first I was hesitant but after understanding what is a being done, I have realized the project seems to be very beneficial. 2 1 live at Amberton Townhomes. The noise is ridiculous here. My daughter has to go sleep at 6/9/2021 1:08 PM her friends house every evening because the noise and traffic is so bad she cannot sleep. How dare you even think about adding more traffic to this mess. You should have to build sound barriers at your cost along on the communities that live on this road. 3 Fix the entrance on to immokalee rd from heritage greens. Everyday it is a constant struggle to 6/2/2021 8:56 PM get out and make the uturn. No one obeys the don't block the box signs or yields to let you cross. This is getting worse every year and there is nothing being done to help out residences leave our community safely 4 Many residents feel that there is far too much construction in the adjacent vicinity. We moved 6/1/2021 7:36 AM here to avoid the congestion. We were under the impression that Naples had been built out, and new construction was being put on hold to avoid the strain on our resources. What is up with all this??? 5 1 find the pictures difficult to visualize. Maybe a video of already existing one would be good to 5/27/2021 5:40 PM compare. What kind of road closures should we expect. 6 Not enough info on alternative solutions.and other pathways to helf traffic flow. 5/25/2021 5:36 PM 7 Please consider a traffic light at the North Gate of Carlton Lakes. 5/25/2021 9:16 AM 8 How long can we expect construction to take? The delays from all of this look horrible for 5/24/20214:16 PM residents of this area. Especially for residents of Carlton Lakes who have no way to avoid the construction backups. 9 The 175 area is now too congested. It was once partially vacant & beautiful. It is now 5/22/2021 10:38 PM congested and ugly. The water slide park was once awesome to walk through. It is now bordered by houses. 10 Main problem is time getting thru Livingston Rd while on Immokalee Rd whether heading west 5/22/2021 9:51 AM or east on Immokalea, & coming on Immokalea heading west from Tarpon Bay Blvd 11 1 know a change to traffic flow is necessary to reduce congestion, just hope it doesn't affect 5/20/2021 11:28 AM property values in Carlton Lakes development. 12 We need to get traffic moving on Immokalee. This is a wise investment for the future. 5/18/2021 9:29 AM 13 Too late to manage it properly. Do what you do. 5/18/2021 7:17 AM 14 Proposed apt. Complex on Juliet Blvd. and Immokalee Rd. Will add to the congestion 5/17/2021 7:21 PM impacting Livingston Rd. But will adversely impact Immokalee Rd traffic. It's already a bottle neck and bumper to bumper most of the day. New apt. Bldg. very bad idea and will severely impact traffic. 15 1 hope the committee considers our opinions 5/17/2021 3:41 PM 16 Yes. It's a pity this survey wasn't done 10 years ago and before Seeds to Table was allowed to 5/17/2021 9:54 AM build at Immokalee and Livingston. This only made the congestion worse. 17 It should not be constructed this close to our community. Carlton Lakes. This type 5/17/2021 9:41 AM construction should be planned where there is no community close. Something is needed to stop this congestion, but this is not it. Stopping development would have been a great idea a couple of years ago until new traffic patterns could have been constructed. Very Poor Planning 18 Additional access from the east of 75 needs to be added. Additionally as a resident of Carlton 5/16/2021 10:09 AM 50 / 73 IMMOKALEE ROAD CORRIDOR CONGESTION STUDY PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT SURVEY Lakes we have needed a light for access to Livingston for years. I don't see this in the plans. This is an very expensive plan and does not address the core issue of additional access from the east of 75. 19 Limiting the number of new communities construction on immokalee rd 5/12/2021 4:05 PM 20 I'm glad these problems are being addressed. 5/4/2021 6:21 PM 21 Should have done this years ago! 5/3/2021 5:57 AM 22 Study should include areas West on Immokalee Starting at 41 or at least Airport Rd. There is 5/2/2021 10:11 AM already heavy traffic there every day - especially from 3-7 pm. 23 1-75 and Immokalee plans seem highly unusual and impossible. 4/30/2021 9:22 PM 24 Appreciate the survey because traffic is bad and getting worse 4/29/2021 5:22 PM 25 Yes, please make sure it doesn't take too long to make a change/improvement to this 4/29/2021 4:07 AM nightmare. 26 1 can't even take a left out of Willoughby Acrrs onto Immokolee after 4:00 because cars block 4/28/2021 9:38 PM the intersection. 27 This is a horrible situation and the planned Vanderbilt extension isn't going to be enough to 4/28/2021 9:00 AM remedy it 28 Stop building all these developments. We have more than enough people here. The little town 4/28/2021 5:00 AM of naples is gone forever sad very sad. 29 Far to late to be adxressing the issue. 4/28/2021 3:22 AM 30 Im at the very least happy that studies are being done. This winter has been the worse I can't 4/27/2021 8:58 PM believe we are going to have a Lexus dealership on Immkolee as well fairly soon. To add to the congestion!! You can't go in the road between 2:30 & 5:30 anymore. It took me one day 45 mins to go from strand Publix to Huntington lakes!!! 31 We do not need to develop every square inch of Collier County or we will become Broward 4/27/2021 8:53 PM West. Commissioners need to stop approving over development ASAP! 32 Planners need to realize that north/south thoroughfares are in short supply. You can't keep 4/27/2021 6:19 PM building without taking in consideration traffic, roads, school, etc 33 We need to keep this area as a route not a major thoroughfare. Put some emphasis on the 4/27/2021 4:56 PM other roadways to help instead. 34 As a Naples Native , born here , it hurts to see us expanding so much that our wildlife and 4/27/2021 4:35 PM beautiful little town becoming a little Miami. As a construction professional I think the roadways definitely need help for the mass amount of people coming . 35 Thank you for trying to solve the problem. 4/27/2021 2:14 PM 36 Fix this mess. I have the Collier County sheriffs departments pulse point app on my phone and 4/27/2021 11:59 AM it is a continuous flow of accidents 37 Immokalee Road is too congested and dangerous 4/27/2021 11:50 AM 38 Rein in the county commissioners who are continuously and irresponsibly approving 4/27/2021 11:48 AM developments along this extended corridor. 39 Respectfully, most of the Commissioners do not take traffic concerns into consideration. The 4/27/2021 11:07 AM people doing traffic studies have lied about the traffic issues to help developers get their projects through and it is concerning. We are turning into the Gulf Coast Miami with the traffic. Improvements to traffic should be started before the development of building projects and should be paid for by the developers and not the Collier County tax payers due to their plans overburdening the roadways with excessive traffic. 40 Stop approving more housing in panther territory, let's have less development! But we also do 4/27/2021 10:58 AM need to improve the traffic on the Immokolee corridor, to better handle the traffic we have today. 41 Traffic is horrific on Immokalee Road. Our commissioners should stop approving new 4/27/2021 10:33 AM developments until we have a better way to handle traffic congestion 51/73 IMMOKALEE ROAD CORRIDOR CONGESTION STUDY PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT SURVEY 42 More east west connector's are needed, for the current traffic as well as future projections. But 4/27/2021 9:52 AM the county planners and developers I've pretty much made that impossible.lf it can be said that speed kills, it can also be said that greed slows us to a crawl And makes us cranky. Those who develop some land take their money and run, the rest of us sit in traffic and wait 43 Anyway we can reduce the amount of traffic lights will help move traffic along, look down the 4/27/2021 9:07 AM road and see what can be done to keep it flowing. 44 It is time to stop saying yes to every project put in front of you. You are ruining this town big 4/27/2021 8:15 AM time! 45 Development of the county is out of control based on infrastructure. Why do planning studies 4/27/2021 8:11 AM implement them and ignore them and whatever developers want? 46 Stop building east and ruining the Everglades. 4/27/2021 7:48 AM 47 Whatever needs to be done, make sure it can be done safely, with consideration of the 4/27/2021 7:38 AM population around here and how well they will take the new driving changes. And the time of year construction needs to be done so that we can still commute to school and work appropriately. 48 Thank you for your efforts. Best of luck. Growth is inevitable. Quality growth that maintains or 4/27/2021 7:33 AM makes a solid effort of retaining the character of the community is welcome. No reasonable opposition to growth plans as proposed would be a disaster for SWFUs future! The state comp plan of maybe Twenty-five years ago seems to have been greatly amended. Fortunately core features which are evident on new or expanded roads are generally honored at least leaving new an expanded road regional system for the most part with no linear never ends commercial development along an entire road uninterrupted with gas stations, banks, retail, etc... 49 Stop trying to overdevleop Naples. This isn't Miami. It has changed so much in the 15 yrs I've 4/27/2021 7:20 AM lived here. All the nice wooded lots are being torn down for gated communities & strip malls. Naples is becoming ugly. 50 The main issue is people commuting from the estates or from ft myers to work, their main 4/27/2021 6:38 AM point of access is the interstate from immokalee, if there was interstate access at vanderbilt beach rd it would alleviate the pressure put on exit 111 but some portion. also it would make sense for the proposed overpass to go east/west instead of north south. and if the school zoning was looked at there would be a large group of homes west of 75 that could be zoned for barron rather than gulf coast which would eliminate a ton of local traffic due to school events. 51 There needs to be another east/west road to 75. Immokalee after 3pm is a parking lot. 4/26/2021 7:54 PM 52 The biggest problem or concern is the possible addition of the large communities in eastern 4/26/2021 7:37 PM Collier County. The over development needs to stop. If we continue to overdevelop that area, no toad improvements will help. Why not do an east -west flyover fly over rather than north - south on Immokalee? 53 There should be an exit to Vanderbilt from 75. Immokalee is really a nightmare. 4/26/2021 7:36 PM 54 The noise level of traffic for those living along Immokalee Rd has become unbearable 4/26/2021 7:05 PM 55 The traffic light at Valewood and Autumn Oaks is not working fairly as those of us trying to get 4/26/2021 5:33 PM out at the Autumn Oaks side have to wait 2 light cycles sometimes as the traffic is too heavy coming out of Valewood and our green turn arrow isn't long enough for us to get across let alone trying to get out and across to the far lane in order to get to the north west lane. Add that to the congestion at the intersection that is being blocked by those traveling Immokalee Rd that didn't make it through their light. It is slightly better since the season has slowed down but What will happen when when this traffic on Oaks Blvd gets any heavier? Thanks for listening. 56 It's almost too late. Please extend Vanderbilt Beach Rd to east. Collier Blvd needs to be wider. 4/26/2021 5:22 PM Immokalee Rd is hopeless 57 The street lights also cause the traffic problems. 4/26/2021 4:26 PM 58 My comment is to focus on the area east of 75. And to change the lights that they put in 4/26/2021 3:56 PM between Walmart and target on Immokalee Road. That has caused delay west of 75 since it was put in before the east was developed. But under no circumstances do I want to resemble Fort Myers. 52 / 73 IMMOKALEE ROAD CORRIDOR CONGESTION STUDY PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT SURVEY 59 Collier is simply growing too fast now. New development needs to slow way down and focus on 4/26/2021 3:47 PM housing industry that exists with a cap on number of new home developments built. It isn't just the roads that are impacted. Schools can't keep up. This learning is impacted. Naples is quickly losing its charm and cachet. I think we need to seriously decide who we want to be. Naples or the dense east coast of the state. 60 We need to stop the building of more communities. We will lose the beauty and charm of 4/26/2021 3:37 PM Naples if it continues. 61 About time! The over pass works on GG parkway it should work for here also! If the county 4/26/2021 3:35 PM wouldn't have approved of all the developments east of 951 we wouldn't have had this problem! Always "fixing" the cart and never taking care of the horse!! Prior propper planning prevents piss poor performance! 62 Stop the building east on imokolee until you fix this. 4/26/2021 3:27 PM 63 This congestion problem continues on through route 41 and should also be part of a proposed 4/26/2021 2:23 PM solution. 64 Yes, the root cause of the issue, continuing overdevelopment, will need to be addressed before 4/26/2021 1:53 PM the issue can be resolved. 65 Not sure what the answer is to the traffic situation on Immokalee. I like all the proposals, just 4/26/2021 1:52 PM need to get started. 66 I'm glad there is a study going on but I think one of the solutions is to go to the source of the 4/26/2021 1:52 PM problem which is uncontrolled development east of 75. 67 Immokolee Road is a disaster in season 4/26/2021 1:32 PM 68 Go for it !!! 4/26/2021 12:49 PM 69 1 think it is terrible how we are just packing people in here for a profit. SWFL (like many places) 4/26/2021 12:25 PM have beautiful nature and wildlife. I moved from Orlando to Naples because the same thing was happening there and now Miami is the same way. The building has to stop at some point. There aren't even enough well paying jobs here. Traffic is a nightmare and here are too many people as it is. I know that innovation is the wave of the future but, it would be nice tp preserve some areas instead of building on every patch of grass. 70 Please, please take into consideration the comments made by the driver's actually using these 4/26/2021 12:12 PM intersections. Thank you! 71 Get it done! 4/26/2021 12:09 PM 72 Find another avenue to relieve traffic congestion, stemming from unabated development in 4/26/2021 11:52 AM East Collier County. 73 No .... just do something to alleviate the traffic..lt can be so bad 4/26/2021 10:44 AM 74 1 live in the Strand, right in the middle of this mess on Immokalee Rd. During rush hour,7-9 am 4/26/2021 9:39 AM and 3-6pm we are essentially blocked in our community or must add an extra hour to go any place. Immokalee and Livingston are our two exits and it's difficult to leave during those hours mentioned above. I feel commissioners are not doing their duty representing the citizens of Collier County allowing such a mess and danger to occur in this area. 75 It seems an overpass at Livingston and Immokalee Rd will only aggravate the traffic jam at 4/26/2021 9:28 AM Livingston and Bonita Beach Rd. That problem can't possibly be fed more cars even faster. Why aren't overpasses being proposed on Immokalee Rd to move traffics faster East to west? 76 Improvements are sorely needed! 4/26/2021 9:12 AM 77 Infrastructure improvements are needed to keep up with growth and development. 4/26/2021 9:10 AM 78 It is almost impossible to make any left turns if it is not at a stoplight. Waiting 10 minutes just 4/26/2021 9:05 AM to turn into your neighborhood is ridiculous! The tall landscaping doesn't help either! 79 Please do something soon!!!! 4/26/2021 8:31 AM 80 1 believe that the changes in the area would be helpful. The immokklee and Livingston area are 4/26/2021 8:24 AM backed up every day. 53 / 73 IMMOKALEE ROAD CORRIDOR CONGESTION STUDY PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT SURVEY 81 Seed to table has really put a strain on the area quickly and from 10 am -8 PM. They are 4/26/2021 7:59 AM building tons of apts on Livingston and east Immokalee road s00000 many housing developments it needs to happen soon! 82 This has been an ongoing problem for years and I'm happy to see that it is finally being 4/26/2021 7:52 AM addressed. The Livingston corridor needs to be corrected to improve the flow of traffic on Immokalee Rd not Livingston Rd. 83 You also should look at putting a 1-75 /Vanderbilt Road access !! 4/26/2021 7:45 AM 84 Overall the County does a good job keeping up with congestion management. 4/26/2021 7:43 AM 85 Do not permit any additional development until this issue can be resolved! You are destroying 4/26/2021 7:38 AM the lifestyle of your perminent residents. Speed up the process of implementing a new Everglades Blvd exit for 1 75 and expedite the Vanderbilt Beach Road Extension. It sounds great to expedite a way to get traffic on and off of 1 75 from Immokalee Road but what backs the on ramp now is that traffic is so bad heading north it backs up the merge and on ramp. Also more traffic enforcement for cars blocking intersections at the traffic lights! 86 It's really silly to ask people their opinions of these options without giving them any numbers of 4/25/2021 9:16 PM cost, construction time, and how many more cars can be moved per hour with the improvements. How can we weigh whether or not we find it worthwhile without knowing these things? 87 Nightmare!!!! Naples is not Naples anymore. (50 4/25/2021 5:03 PM 88 Not all development is good for the County. The Growth management Plan determines the 4/25/2021 4:35 PM correct growth of the County. Commissioners are constantly overriding this Plan resulting in poorly planned mitigation methods. 89 A light on immokalee at Oakes Farm just before the Livingston light 4/25/2021 4:32 PM 90 No, other than there is already WAY too much traffic on Immokalee Rd! 4/25/2021 4:14 PM 91 This study should have been conducted years ago before Commissioner moved forward 4/24/2021 5:41 PM approving 3 rural villages that alone will add 20,000+car trips per day. Irresponsible comprehensive planning at the people's expense. 92 Big Cypress being developed expects 8,300 families, then there will be: 3 other villages with 4/24/2021 1:17 PM additional traffic. Whatever is best for the citizens who are already living in this area, who never expected this growth in the first place, is the best thing in serving future traffic problems. 93 Heard from Gulfshore Business Daily. The Sarasota interchange gained by attention. Good to 4/24/2021 6:52 AM see Lee county implementing. How many added vehicles (% increase) per hour does Sarasota report with the new interchange? 94 Too much residential and commercial building with no regard to traffic and roadways! 4/23/2021 9:31 AM 95 1 don't have the answers but something definitely needs to be done. Normal 10 minute trips 4/23/2021 8:54 AM now take 30+. 96 You need to look at a Michigan left turns. Novi, Michigan I think it is 1 5. Keeps traffic moving 4/23/2021 7:45 AM beautifully. 97 Please figure it out sooner than later and get construction going!! 4/23/2021 6:18 AM 98 We desperately need a light at Randall and 8th since opening up 8th.It is dangerous and 4/23/2021 4:28 AM practically impossible to navigate. 99 Please consider adding an exit off 175 at Vanderbilt Beach Road. I believe that would alleviate 4/22/2021 10:46 PM much of the traffic using the interchange on Immokalee Road from the south. 100 No. 4/22/2021 6:41 PM 101 How do we know when the project will get started, 4/22/2021 3:22 PM 102 Going left from Valewood to Immokalee Rd toward high school is bad. Long lights and drivers 4/22/2021 12:57 PM seem confused as to whether they can go left, often traffic is coming at you from the other side of the intersection. 103 Please read my message RE we Desperately need two bypasses, one east of the 1-75 toll and 4/22/2021 11:52 AM 54 / 73 IMMOKALEE ROAD CORRIDOR CONGESTION STUDY PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT SURVEY mostly one ON THE MIDDLE OF GOLDEN GATE ESTATES!! THIS WOULD ELEVATE THE TRAFFIC ON IMMOKALLEE RD, PINE RIDGE, VANDERBILT, ETC ... PLEASE READ THIS COMMENT TO THE BOARD WITH SERIOUS CONSIDERATION. I WILL BE HAPPY TO HELP IF YOU WISH TO CONTACT ME. BELOW IS MY INFO. LADONNA URI 12966 WHITE VIOLET DRIVE QUAIL CREEK ESTATES NAPLES, FL Zip 34119 Cell (249) 289-6464 104 Don't have clue how going to change congestion on both roadways in naples to many needed 4/22/2021 11:00 AM turns going across traffic. No ones going to stop let you go this is 2021 it's all about them 105 1 am glad that the county is studying the corridor. 4/22/2021 9:49 AM 106 Open Everglades blvd to interstate 75 and also Desoto. This will definitely help Immokalee 4/22/2021 7:55 AM road. At least open Everglades blvd 107 Thank you for asking the residents these questions. I truly hope you see our town has 4/22/2021 6:36 AM developed too many houses/condos too quickly, and that has put us in this situation. 108 The Collier commissioners are all about the big money, NOT citizens. They ruined the Oakes 4/22/2021 6:05 AM Estates community by bowing down for the payout and allowing the adult center. FAILURE !!!! They take BIG contributions & then do favors 109 Any way to widen road to one more lane on each side all down immokalee 4/22/2021 3:41 AM 110 1 don't understand the thought process here? Naples is going to turn into a nightmare sooner 4/22/2021 3:07 AM than later! You think the congestion is bad now lol. There are at least two new communities being built on immokalee road and there's a community that was just approved on oil well road with approximately 8500 homes and they are expanding Ave Maria everyday! All these people in all these communities that will all be traveling via immokalee road in the very near future... If you've noticed things have already drastically changed in the last 5 years.. I remember when you used to be able to live here and you never hear a horn beep. Now that's all you hear. Road rage is escalating and so are accidents. Pretty soon it's not going to be much more different than the city you left to come to Paradise! Everyday in my travels now I see the demolition of wildlife habitats to create more housing for the retired and wealthy. I haven't seen any animals in my backyard for 3 years now but I am seeing more deceased on the roadway than ever before. Just think about it, that one community that is going to be built on oil well road with 8,500 homes each home containing at least two people with the possibility of $17,000 more vehicles on the roadways. And that's just one road in naples they are building everywhere. Cash is King here and it comes before everything! God please help us because we know not what we do! 111 Immokalee is the worst road in the county. I live off Collier and work near goodlette. I take 4/21/2021 9:37 PM immokalee every single day and it takes over 30 minutes or more due to lights and lots of congestion. We need a change. 112 Out East on Immokalee Rd. Do not put so many homes in all the areas as the infrastructure 4/21/2021 8:33 PM will not hold the traffic even if you make all the traffic recommendations. Think it through Commissioners. It will choke out Naples. In the future even more people will be coming here from up North because of their policys. 113 It is just so frustrating that Bill McDaniels is in the Collier family pockets and growth will 4/21/2021 6:24 PM continue because he doesn't have to drive it everyday and will always approve any development. That being said a fly over going East-West at Immokalee and Collier would be well received also. 114 Please consider Rte 951 (Collier Blvd) in he study. There are more homes being built in this 4/21/2021 5:26 PM area and the congestion is terrible. 115 1 heard about this survey via the news outlet on 04.21 21, it's a shame that the County did not 4/21/2021 4:53 PM notify residents that will be affected by this directly. 116 Whatever the county decides please act fast. Also, part of the problem are the seasonal 4/18/2021 12:12 PM residents. Can anything be done with that? Since these additions are not needed off season. 117 1 believe that not having an 1-75 On & Off ramp at Vanderbilt Rd. has caused an massive influx 4/16/2021 2:40 PM of traffic both on Immokalee and Pine Ridge 1-75 exits. I believe a study of an interchange or exit on Vanderbilt Rd. should be taken into consideration first. 118 This area is highly congested, I just wonder if there are solutions that require less cognitive 4/16/2021 12:44 PM strain. 55 / 73 IMMOKALEE ROAD CORRIDOR CONGESTION STUDY PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT SURVEY 119 This survey needs to go directly to every resident living in this particular area! Having it tucked 4/16/2021 11:31 AM on page 6, 7, or 8 in a newsletter is inappropriate!! Livingston Rd does not need an overpass!!! 120 Please talk to the residents before any decisions are made. I'm so close to leaving Naples for 4/16/2021 7:43 AM good because it is too built up. Our beaches are being destroyed and our wildlife are being forced into residential neighborhoods because we are building on every inch of Collier County. It is not the town I moved to over 20 years ago! 121 I am glad this study has been done and there is hope for less traffic. Thanks 4/16/2021 5:22 AM 122 With so much development planned east of CR951, I'm curious about new roads in that area 4/15/2021 7:52 PM that might impact the study area. 123 The majority of the traffic is coming on Immoklee and as more development occurs to the East 4/14/2021 1:12 PM and fewer amenities open excessive traffic will continue. These residents will drive down Immokolee to go to Trader Joe's, Mercato and other locations to the west. A better solution is elevated express lanes that will connect directly to a 1-75 cloverleaf and will move traffic from before Livingston and past Logan. It would be helpful if additional 1-75 freeway on/off ramps were added at Veteran's Parkway and Vanderbilt. 124 Please read question #1 4/14/2021 11:35 AM 125 Is Veteran's Memorial Pkwy going to connect Logan to US 41 in the future? I think this would 4/12/2021 5:38 PM add another option 126 Please consider more roundabouts on some of the other roads starting to get higher traffic 4/12/2021 2:18 PM (Randall, etc). 127 Collier County Transportation Department is way behind the proverbial eight ball in so many 4/12/2021 12:14 PM areas. We are destined for the same F grade Lee County gets everytime the fed does an analysis addressing transportation infrastructure. 128 1 try to avoid Immokalee Rd as much as possible due to how bad the whole road is. It would be 4/12/2021 11:32 AM nice if I could use it again without dreading it. 129 Consider joining new right turn lanes from Noterhbrooke Dr onto Immokalee Rd with the 4/12/2021 9:26 AM expanded turn lanes for 175 to 1- allow more time for vehicles continuing west on Immokalee Rd to safely merge onto Immokalee vs. forcing them to immediately turn into the main flow of Immokalee Rd. 2- allow drivers entering 175 to not have to merge with the main flow of Immokalee Rd for a approx 500 ft. before turning into the 175 turn lanes 130 The 1 Mile Study Area is skewed. There is DIRECT IMPACT to Quail Creek Estates which is 4/12/2021 8:01 AM road -locked with Valewood as the only egress/ingress (and even with an alternative second entrance being only possible on Logan); A significant portion of Cypress Woods is road -locked to Tarpon Bay. Perhaps this was taken into account? The amount of growth along this corridor -- including on the south side of Immokalee and all work to the East is concerning not only from a roads perspective, but from a water management perspective. As we continue to allow growth, the Canal takes on more and more water during rainy season, as do lower lying grounds in existing neighborhoods. I implore the County to make plans that address the long term with the roadways for a cost and a disruption perspective, as well as considering how this level of growth will harm the environment as well as the livability of Collier County -- Immokalee Road is rapidly looking more and more like 41 in Fort Myers. Medians and Trees and buffer zones are incredibly important to quality of life and our property values. (Golden Gate Parkway by Airport is beautifully done). Thank you for your careful consideration. 131 Please continue the study east to 951. Immokalee is so heavy with traffic that we try to avoid 4/12/2021 7:59 AM it between 3 and 7pm in season. Not sure how it could be stopped but with additional developments going in off of Immokalee east of us, Heritage Greens, I am very concerned. Too hard to get out of our neighborhood as it is! 132 Better public transportation. Like a Monorail system. Or better yet... stop the building East of 4/12/2021 6:55 AM 951/Collier Blvd and Immokalee Rd. 133 Many driver's block Valewood intersection driving west on immoklee, any relief? 4/11/2021 9:48 PM 134 You need to build 1-75 exit on Vanderbilt Rd to help with the traffic. 4/11/2021 8:36 PM 135 More police present at the intersections giving out tickets would be great. 4/11/2021 5:47 PM 56 / 73 IMMOKALEE ROAD CORRIDOR CONGESTION STUDY PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT SURVEY 136 LIVINGSTON IS GOING TO BE A NIGHTMARE DURING CONSTRUCTION (NO 4/11/2021 2:30 PM ALTERNATIVE ROADS EITHER SIDE OF LIVINGSTON NORTH OF IMMOKALEE). TEMPORARY ROAD BY THE FPL POWER LINES ? 137 Extend Collier Blvd north of Immokalee to Bonita springs Road sooner than later 4/11/2021 2:17 PM 138 Glad you're looking at this. Also, the lack of synchronization of the traffic lights in this stretch 4/11/2021 1:45 PM also needs to be examined. Thanks. 139 Traffic needs to be diverted further east of Logan perhaps at Collier Blvd. Other than Logan 4/11/2021 12:47 PM there is no access to Bonita Beach Rd. Also. East of Collier build thoroughfare to Pine Ridge. TWith all the building east of Collier Blvd this is only going to get worse 140 Traffic light at Delasol Ln. and Livingston Rd., please. 4/11/2021 12:30 PM 141 1 live in Ave Maria and work part time in Naples and all of my doctors are in Naples and I stay 4/11/2021 11:54 AM off of Immoklee rd by using Desoto and Golden Gate. Much easier & safer. 142 What's really needed is a north south road at or east of Collier. 4/11/2021 11:12 AM 143 As mentioned, please provide rationales and data on the proposed options so that it would be 4/11/2021 11:06 AM easier to evaluate these plans. Thank you! 144 1 lived in Ave Maria since 2007 so I've seen the growth, I remember when the planning 4/11/2021 10:36 AM commission said the Oil Well road project was a road to nowhere. There was no money to totally expand to 4 lanes dividend. Now look at Immokalee rd and oil well rd. Put the money in the budget, let the builders and developers pay the additional impact fees to build the overpass. Just my thoughts. I grew up in Detroit, they never addressed a mass transit fix in the 70's and 80's so this is what happens. 145 1 heard about the study through TV news report; I don't consider that social media so none of 4/11/2021 10:04 AM the answers above were appropriate for me. 146 We seriously need to think of the continued over development of this area. If other means of 4/11/2021 10:03 AM transportation are not possible then we are forced to reduce the introduction of more residence. 147 1 live in Huntington Lakes, we high is right in the center of all this congestion. Anything you 4/11/2021 8:25 AM can do will be greatly appreciated. It's effecting our property values and our nerves. 148 Good luck. Widen the on ramps to 75, that gets so backed up cause most of the traffic in the 4/11/2021 8:13 AM afternoon. 149 It is good that you are working on a solution to increase the flow of traffic on Immokallee as 4/11/2021 8:03 AM increased building of homes to the east of 1-75 and truck traffic usually has me bypassing the road whenever possible, rush hour is a bear. 150 1 believe the main focus should be getting people onto 1-75. It's the heart of Immokalee Road. 4/11/2021 7:36 AM The diamond intersection would be a fantastic addition my next concern will be traffic cause by the construction though. With limited room and difficult and long detours the traffic will only get worse before it gets better. But the sooner it begins the sooner we will see the results. 151 1 think anything that can help the Livingston-Immokalee intersection is a good thing. To go to 4/11/2021 6:53 AM work, I have to head north on Livingston and take a U-turn to eventually head south. That one maneuver can be troublesome with all the folks heading east on Immokalee trying to turn right while we're u-turning. 152 1 live in along Oil well hoping some of the other north south and east west improvements will 4/11/2021 6:40 AM allow me to use alternate routes to get where I need to like livingston extension. Is there any way to provide a video modeling how these traffic patterns would work with cars? Hard to tell by this graphic how traffic is suppose to flow for the projects at least hard for me. Back up also occurs at gulf coast high school left turn lane in the mornings I know lanes have already been extended but it keeps happening and as more houses come online to the east don't see that getting any better. Also found out about this survey from WINK news not sure if that fits in the options provided. 153 Immokalee Road is a FAILED road. Let's get it fixed. 4/11/2021 6:26 AM 154 Off season I live in a very large city where intersections go under or over a major highway and 4/11/2021 6:17 AM they have built cloverleaf ramps onto the highway with all entrance ramps to either direction of the highway come off the feeder road to the right. With no left hand turns onto the highway and 57 / 73 IMMOKALEE ROAD CORRIDOR CONGESTION STUDY PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT SURVEY longer ramps to the right the traffic situation is much alleviated on the feeder road such as Immokalee. 155 Long overdue, thank you. 4/11/2021 5:47 AM 156 Can you coordinate all traffic lights at these intersections with computer software that 4/11/2021 5:31 AM constantly optimized light timing to move traffic and minimize wait times? Call Carnegie Mellon University. They work on these programs. 157 Add more stoplights at new and existing developments to slow traffic and improve safety for 4/11/2021 1:19 AM residents. And make improvements now, before there's more gridlock and traffic becomes more horrendous. Permitting the Seed to Table parking lot across the street from the store was a disastrous decision. Employees are not supposed to cross the street as pedestrians, but they do this all the time. Similarly, the store has attracted more pedestrians, bikers and occasionally protesters, all of which make driving more dangerous and difficult. Please ban gatherings on public property like sidewalks near the store, and do something to prevent Seed to Table employees from jaywalking across the street. Weren't they supposed to take a shuttle from the parking lot, paid for by Alfie Oakes? 158 Let's try and get it right the first time. Not just for now but also the foreseeable future. Good 4/11/2021 12:38 AM Luck 159 1 heard about study/survey on WINK NEWS. 4/10/2021 11:47 PM 160 Could there be an inclosed sidewalk for cyclists to protect them from cars and the sun? 4/10/2021 9:48 PM 161 Making another exit ramp off 175 located onto Vanderbilt Beach Rd, north and south. 4/10/2021 9:26 PM 162 Getting to 1 75 from Immokalee Road near. Northbrook you have two lanes going to 75 then it 4/10/2021 8:47 PM merges to one which could cause lost of accidents so maybe you can look into thst. 163 You have more people moving to this area with only in main thoroughfare since you have all of 4/10/2021 8:33 PM these private communities. It's very frustrating to travel since there's only one way in or out and if there's any issue, you're stuck. Since so much building is happening further down Immokalee you need to address it now. 164 Please go the extra mile and review Logan East to Collier. 4/10/2021 5:55 PM 165 I'm happy a study is being done, but I hope Collier and the state can move quickly on the 4/10/2021 5:51 PM results and ground can be broken on the mater. It will only continue to get busier as the years go by, let's make a solution! 166 This has been an issue since Immokalee Rd was improved years ago. Longer left turn lanes 4/10/2021 5:36 AM are sometimes not the answer as traffic routinely backs up to traffic causing delays and accidents. I hope this can get started soon. 167 The traffic is insane everyday! I have to drive this road multiple times a day and it make me 4/9/2021 6:32 AM have major anxiety. 168 1 believe this plan misses the mark entirely. The most congestion currently occurs almost the 4/9/2021 2:18 AM entirity of Immokolee Rd., but on Livingston back up is not really significant until reaching the light at Immokolee and Livingston. 169 There has to be better Options 4/8/2021 9:32 PM 170 Getting out of Stand Boulevard can take a very long time 4/8/2021 7:14 PM 171 Traffic is so bad on immokalee I try to avoid it and want my kids to go to the new charter 4/8/20214:49 PM school out there but worried only about traffic 172 If it's going to help with traffic issues, these changes will be great! 4/8/2021 2:01 PM 173 Best wishes with a most consequential project. 4/8/2021 1:54 PM 174 Immoklee and Livingston is a very dangerous intersection, too many frequent accidents. For 4/8/2021 9:00 AM example, 99% of drivers coming from the west on Immoklee turning right/south on Livingston do not yield to us making a u turn to go south on Livingston when we have the right of way. Too many people also running red lights at this intersection. Between all of the congestion , u turns, it is a very dangerous intersection for all drivers and improvements are crucial to everyone's safety. We Livingston Lakes residents can only exit our community by going through this dangerous intersection. 58 / 73 IMMOKALEE ROAD CORRIDOR CONGESTION STUDY PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT SURVEY 175 Survey needs to be extend eastward to include the intersection of immokalee Rd and Col 951. 4/8/2021 8:34 AM With new development occuring. new retail/condo on the corner and numerous schools, if we looking out into the future this should be considered now. 176 Regardless something has to be done. 4/7/2021 11:22 PM 177 Would like to hear updates on this as soon as possible. 4/7/2021 9:02 PM 178 Why did the study not continue down to Collier Blvd? I live in Heritage Greens, and the traffic 4/7/2021 9:34 AM congestion makes it very difficult to exit our community. Could the study be increased to include the issues that exist and are growing between Logan and Collier? 179 Why isn't a "study " being done further east on Immokalee Rd. prior to allowing "villages" of 4/7/2021 7:27 AM thousands of new homes and car traffic? What about Collier blvd and Immokalee Road? How is Immokalee Road to handles the new traffic which will severely impact the residents REGARDLESS of how close they live to your current study area? This study has a huge gap in assessing traffic volume by giving a choice of usage with frequency every day or at least once a week. 180 Traffic congestion in front of the Heritage Greens Community entrance/exit is horrendously 4/6/2021 9:22 PM congested and dangerous for residents trying to get out and then make a u-turn at Immokalee Road and Preserve Lane. There is a designated "do not block" area when the light is red, but it is rarely observed. Please help us! 181 1 think you should really evaluate the loss of tourist $$ when you make do something like exit 4/6/2021 9:16 PM 213 or Daniels and 82. Neither are good. And no I'm not expert but I've been around asphalt for 30 years and collier is full of poorly designed parking lots. So it wouldn't be surprising for it to be approved 182 Stop building until roadways are improved. Why the year 2045 is being used when its totally 4/6/2021 7:19 PM congested now. If 175 is backed up, Immokalee Rd is a nightmare 183 Improve the infrastructure 4/6/2021 6:49 PM 184 Too many cars. Too many people. Too much new resident housing. Too much destruction of 4/6/2021 5:13 PM natural resources. "The tragedy of the commons" 185 Glad you are looking for traffic solutions 4/6/2021 2:55 PM 186 The "frequency of use" question is misleading. I may not use each of those intersections daily 4/6/2021 1:17 PM but I do use them more than once a week --probably 2-3 times per week each. 187 You say drive safe!! HaHa every deputies say it's awful now on Immokalee clear to Collier 4/6/2021 1:12 PM Blvd and they can't issue speeding tickets. Most on Immokalee Rd drive 50-60 MPH. Totally unsafe. 188 Thank you! 4/6/2021 12:52 PM 189 Anything you do will make it better, thank you 4/6/2021 11:48 AM 190 The traffic on Immokalee is horrendous, far beyond these intersections. What makes this 4/6/2021 10:37 AM particular part of Immokalee so bad has to do with the sequence of lights between Logan and Livingston, which do not seem to be synchronized. 191 With all the new construction east of that area on Immokalee, I believe the congestion in this 4/6/2021 10:20 AM corridor will worsen rapidly. 192 The next study needs report move further out Immokalee Rd to include the intersections all the 4/6/2021 9:09 AM way to Twin Eagles at a minimum, but as the new school and developments are built it really needs to continue out to Oil Well Rd.... maybe an extension or over pass for Bonita Beach Rd or an exit/entrance road on Vanderbilt Beach Rd and 75. 193 Glad to see that there is progress being studied for a better flow on Immokalee. But we also 4/6/2021 8:53 AM desperately need a light by heritage greens. We risk our lives getting in and out of HG 194 The actual issue is from all the traffic East of Collier Blvd. Most of the traffic issues now and 4/6/2021 8:47 AM the future is to divert some of the traffic East on Collier Blvd off of Immokalee. Extending collier would help. With Founders Square opening soon it will only make this situation on Immokalee worse. It was mentioned that it will be grid lock by 2040 it will be as early as 2030. 59/73 IMMOKALEE ROAD CORRIDOR CONGESTION STUDY PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT SURVEY 195 The intersection is busy now and will get worse as the study indicates. I support the initiatives. 4/6/2021 8:14 AM 196 The fact that they are doing a traffic study after approving, Seed to Table, Lexus dealership 4/6/2021 8:08 AM and pending low income housing next to the dealership is ridiculous ..... maybe we need to work the other way around. Too late! 197 My concern is continued growth. The area east of that area is growing rapidly and feeds into 4/6/2021 7:49 AM the Logan area. Specifically the congested area at the intersection of Collier and Immokolee. The construction is going to have a huge impact further west. 198 anything to help the traffic flow better, gets very congested. 4/6/2021 6:52 AM 199 Something MUST be done !! Especially with all the new communities. malls and construction 4/6/2021 4:15 AM coming to this area!! 200 The biggest need is to get more cars off Immokalee Rd by adding an interchange at Vanderbilt 4/5/2021 10:42 PM Beach Rd and by extending Collier Blvd north to Bonita Beach Rd. Also, Logan Blvd north of Immokalee Rd is backed up between the stop sign at Old Cypress and Immokalee Rd recently. 201 Oakes Blvd for a residential neighborhood is more like a major roadway to cut through. Please 4/5/2021 10:35 PM figure out how to turn this road back to a residential street. 202 You need to also look at the area between Logan and Collier blvd traffic is the same or heavier 4/5/2021 9:22 PM than area being discussed plus you have two schools in this area which brings more traffic if you live in Saturni or Heritage Greens sometimes you have to go to Collier and then to Vanderbilt in order to travel west because of traffic on Immokalee backed up in east and west directions 203 U turn prior to the light on immokklee on Livingston 4/5/2021 8:07 PM 204 Immokalee road needs more lanes that will take you straight in addition to the lanes that need 4/5/2021 7:46 PM to turn off. 205 Great project when will it be completed 4/5/2021 7:18 PM 206 None 4/5/2021 7:18 PM 207 High traffic area most days! Drivers exceeding the posted speed limit on Livingston Rd. and 4/5/2021 7:12 PM Immokalee Rd. most hours of the day contribute to the danger of driving these roads daily. A potential overpass might be a realistic approach to traffic congestion in the area. 208 1 sent a letter last week with recommendations for change from Valewood Dive to 1-75. My 4/5/2021 7:00 PM name is James Gerali 209 1 am concerned about the overall traffic disruption during the construction of the various 4/5/2021 6:48 PM projects. Moreover, I am highly concerned about the safety and general ease of access into and out of the Livingston Lakes residential community. How will Livingston Lakes residents exit the community and safely head South on Livingston Road? We currently head North in Livingston and then perform an immediate left U turn at the intersection of Livingston Rd. and Immokolee. Please advise. 210 If Collier County is serious about easing traffic, then the planning board must stop approving 4/5/2021 6:22 PM new building projects along Livingston Rd. and Immokalee Rd. No new Car Dealership is required, nor Apartments which will only add to the problem. 211 Do not let more traffic onto Oakes Blvd. That is a neighborhood road and should stay that way. 4/5/2021 2:17 PM 212 Help is greatly appreciated. Hoping Collier Boulevard some day extends north which would 4/5/2021 2:10 PM alleviate congestion and/or I hear that there could be a road built from Immokalee (town) to golden gate area which would help too. 213 We live in Longshore Lake, and I cannot come home before 6 or 6:30 because I am not able to 4/5/2021 1:57 PM turn right onto Vanderbilt from Livingston because traffic is backed up to Orange Blossom. I am not able to get onto Valewood even though I take the cut thru off of Oaks because cars travling westbound are backed up trying to get unto the interstate and they block the intersection of Immokalee and Valewood. So we do not go out at 8:00 am or come home at 5:00!!!! Frustration to the extreme!!!! This has been a problem for at least 3 years now! 214 1 live in a community off of Valewood. I think it would be a huge mistake to have a dedicated 4/5/2021 1:03 PM left turn lane and a straight/right turn lane. Turning right on red is legal, but going straight is 60 / 73 IMMOKALEE ROAD CORRIDOR CONGESTION STUDY PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT SURVEY not. One car going straight would tie up a lot of traffic that could otherwise move onto Immokalee Rd. We need a dedicated right turn lane. 215 Add an entrance on 175 from Vanderbilt. 4/5/2021 12:35 PM 216 The Collier Blvd/Immokalee intersection that is quickly becoming more congested with the 4/5/2021 11:56 AM building of Founders Square should also be addressed 217 looking forward to the improvements 4/5/2021 11:51 AM 218 1 understand "season" and that it may be impossible to foresee upcoming traffic issues. For 4/5/2021 11:40 AM the people that live here year-round the gauge life according to a Markley Boulevard... Absolutely sucks! It either takes me 15 minutes to get to work for an hour and 15 minutes to get to work depending on the time a day depending on the time year. Any help would be greatly appreciated and any expansion is absolutely needed 219 STOP DEVELOPING EAST!!! 4/5/2021 11:35 AM 220 Agree with your recommendations Please stop dump trucks on Logan extension 4/5/2021 11:23 AM 221 Traffic is horrible. I drive to fort myers for work at night, I'm a nurse, it takes me longer to get 4/5/2021 11:01 AM out of Naples sometimes than to get to Ft Myers. 222 A lot of this would be unnecessary if Bonita Beach Road would be extended to Immokalee 4/5/2021 11:00 AM Road. A good proportion of this traffic is from the town of Immokalee trying to get to 75. 223 These improvements are going to be required to accommodate the expansion of communities 4/5/2021 10:53 AM east of Collier Blvd 224 Please do anything needed to improve immokalee rd 4/5/2021 10:23 AM 225 You can't clean up a huge pile of s@@t with a spoon, you need a bulldozer. We need to get on 4/5/2021 9:58 AM 175 in another way other than Immokakee Road. 226 1 am so glad to see the issue is being studied, the 175 interchange is the most important 4/5/2021 9:51 AM change I think. If that worked better I believe it would alleviate some of the issues at Logan and Livingston. At a minimum a 2 lane turn lane onto 175N on the eastern side of the interchange would be a tremendous and immediate alleviation of congestion, every other directional turn has 2 lanes except this directions which causes significant backup in the far right lane of immokalee which can stretch back beyond Logan Blvd. at its worst, also I witness it all the time where people stay in middle lane and at last minute move over causing braking of vehicles in turn lane which then cause a domino effect of braking all the way back 227 1 would like to thank everyone for even thinking about these changes. They would be 4/5/2021 9:43 AM welcomed by everyone if it helps with the congestion 228 Please look at the entire Immokalee road corridor between Randell and Airport Pulling. There is 4/5/2021 9:30 AM massive congestion during peak travel times at almost every intersection with a light. Especially at Collier Blvd. 229 To alleviate traffic in the area being studied an extension of Collier blvd to logan extension 4/5/2021 8:40 AM would be a tremendous help. There would have virtually no effect on current traffic conditions during construction because it is not currently a road. This would be similar to the logan extension project but would eliminate the traffic from the developments east of Collier Blvd wishing to head north. This would also reduce the amount of traffic passing by Gulf Coast High School and Laurel Oak Elementary School which would be a safer environment for the students. 230 1 am shocked that the development along Immokalee rd. continues... adding numerous new 4/5/2021 8:31 AM developments and multi family complexes... many approved long before this traffic issue is solved. 231 The traffic congestion due to increased building on Valewood Blvd needs to be looked at as 4/5/2021 7:56 AM well. It takes forever to get on to Immokalee Rd and accidents have increased on Valewood and the professional center road merging at the intersection of these two roads just before Immokalee Rd. 232 1 take logan to Vanderbilt to avoid Immokalee because it is so congested. I work off of 41 and 4/5/2021 7:48 AM it would be easier to go straight down Immokalee but it can add up to 20 minutes to my commute. 61/73 IMMOKALEE ROAD CORRIDOR CONGESTION STUDY PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT SURVEY 233 Ironic how the County & BOCC keeps approving developments east of 1-75 along Immokalee 4/5/2021 7:03 AM Road without having a true N/S alternative besides 1-75. You know the road has failed, yet you continue to approve significant residential developments along this corridor. CR 951 needs to be extended north to SWFL International Airport to allow residents to the east of Logan Blvd. to access this area without utilizing 1-75. STOP approving new developments until the study area is improved and a acceptable N/S alternative is completed. 234 Do work from 10pm -6am to avoid impacting peak hours traffic; unlike the work that was 4/5/2021 7:00 AM recently performed on Immokalee Road 235 Glad to see you looking at this section. Traffic is just awful and getting worse each year. This 4/4/2021 9:56 PM year during the high season it was consistently congested and dangerous. 236 Even when listening to the video, I don't think it is really clear what is going to be done in some 4/4/2021 7:12 PM of the areas. The video had an echo to it. I think the drawings could be more clearer. We are happy you are looking to solve the issues with the traffic as it is terrible unless we leave really early or late. Thank you for asking the questions. We really need Valewood to be looked at as it may take several lights to get out of the intersection. Many times it is because the trucks and cars on Immokalee block the intersection when we have the green light. Then the crawl down Immokalee and many times not one car gets out going right off Valewood to Immokalee. One time I sat through 3 lights before any car got off Valewood. I was the 5th car and it took me 7 lights to turn right. 237 With the increasing growth these measures are desperately needed to correct and/or prevent 4/4/2021 12:38 PM congestion. 238 Stop the construction until you have the congestion figured out 4/3/2021 3:43 PM 239 We need better traffic control on Immokalee. What about another 175 interchange at 4/3/2021 11:17 AM Vanderbilt? 240 There are many speeders and cars with loud mufflers racing up and down in the evening. 4/2/2021 6:16 PM Suggest give some tickets to discourage them. Why not also add an exit off Vanderbilt Road from 75? Stop the over building in this area. 241 Also please consider moving forward the 951 and Immokalee intersection project. Too much 4/2/2021 5:26 PM traffic. Too many accidents and in another year Founders Square will open making matters worse. Perhaps we need a connector / bypass highway connecting 175 at Davis running through Golden Gate Estates and reconnecting to 175 at Bonita Beach Rd or further North. 242 It is time to decongest Immokalee Road. 4/2/2021 5:05 PM 243 Some aspects of the congestion relief efforts such as the additional WB Immokalee thru/turn 4/1/2021 9:19 PM lane appear to involve little repaving and could be implemented with lane restripping. 244 Glad it is being done but it is 5 years late. County commission allowed unbridled growth with 4/1/2021 7:39 PM no infrastructure. 245 Lets use some common sense here. Just re -time the lights to handle the flow in or out. You 4/1/2021 1:47 PM can't have an extended light say at Livingston and a shorter one east bound at Juliet receiving the traffic. All lights need to sync up allowing continual flow. People need to realize that Naples is not a sleepy little town anymore. Traffic will continue, no different than Miami or Orlando or other cities and towns north or west of us. 246 Enough is enough- no more developments 4/1/2021 1:05 PM 247 1 applaud Collier County for having the vison to propose the changes. Collier County has been 4/1/2021 12:35 PM very progressive in their urban traffic planning efforts. Thank you. 248 Necessary because of the tremendous amount of traffic, particularly during season. Please 3/31/2021 8:13 PM keep pedestrians and bicyclists in mind in any design. I use the bike trail along the canal nearly every day and its straight, free flow has already been interrupted at Logan Boulevard and Collier Boulevard. 249 Given the circumstances of the pandemic, a shortened season and many business closures 3/31/2021 3:59 PM and restrictions, this survey may not be a true representation of traffic flows in this area, at this time ie., I used to travel Logan Blvd more frequently before the pandemic to get to work. Now its is only about once a week. 62 / 73 IMMOKALEE ROAD CORRIDOR CONGESTION STUDY PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT SURVEY 250 Looking forward to the improvements 3/31/2021 3:18 PM 251 Good job waiting so long to do this. Perhaps this should have been done when you were 3/31/2021 1:21 PM authorizing all of the new developments. How about studying putting an east/west road somewhere between Immokalee and Vanderbilt. It is pretty bad that the goal is to get to a "E" level state of traffic. Most times the roads are already at an "F, level. By the time all of this gets done, it will be out of date. You need to a more comprehensive study of how to add more roads and less development. 252 Executive drive and Valewwod drive have had at least 6 accidents since 2020 Thanksgiving. 1 3/31/2021 12:51 PM live in longshore lake it is very dangerous when approaching executive drive cars back up trying to exit to immokalee rd. Unfortunately folks do not use the exit by the Mobil station. The executive valewood cut through is very similar to the one that existed in the strand which was closed a few years ago. The valewwod cut through is used for u turns at times executive and valewood are literally backed up to Palazzo. 253 Yes..... 951 needs to be built northward!!! Development east of 951 cannot be funneled west to 3/31/2021 12:28 PM i75 in order to go northbound. I understand the environmental concerns. If we can buold bridges to connect the florida keys, that technology could be utilized for 951 northbound. 254 One thing that could immediately help with congestion is actively enforcing the "do not block 3/31/2021 12:12 PM intersection" signs - especially at Valewood/Oakes and Immokalee. It is a common sight to see that intersection completely blocked, and Collier County Sheriff cars driving by without doing anything. If people started understanding that gridlock is a ticketable offense, perhaps they will obey the signage. 255 Something has to be done... quickly! Traffic on Imokkolee Rd is horrible. I live in Heritage Bay 3/31/2021 11:11 AM on Imokkolee Rd. Can't get out or into my development without risking my life!!! 3 1/2 Miles to RT 75 can take 20-30 minutes in traffic.... crazy! 256 In favor of improvements suggested. 3/31/2021 11:09 AM 257 Build these sooner than 2040. I'll probably be dead by then and it won't matter. But, the 3/31/2021 9:29 AM amount of, and density of construction on Immokalee is stunning. We need road improvement as soon as possible. Thank you. 258 Congestion and speeding on Logan is a concern. 3/31/2021 9:19 AM 259 Traffic on Immokalee Road is ridiculous now, and adding the Rural Lands projects will make it 3/31/2021 8:46 AM worse. Collier Blvd should extend to Bonita Beach Road to divert some of the northbound traffic. More East/West corridors are needed to take traffic off of Immokalee Road, Developers need to take responsibility for their impact on the infrastructure and pay for improvements up front, not after their developments are done and they find a way to wiggle out of the agreements or put in substandard roads, like Logan Blvd north of Immokalee Rd. Place a moratorium on development until a regional solution is found, not this band -aid approach to problems created by those developments. Based on the Logan Blvd traffic studies, I can say without reservation that whomever conducted the studies has an agenda that is not in the best interest of residents but instead favors trucking companies that are tearing up a road not designed for their weight or with safety/ access for emergency vehicles in mind. Notifying trucking companies that the road will be monitored is so absurd it's laughable. Commissioners with a vested interest in the trucking companies must recuse themselves and be removed from any and all discussions of the problems. Keep the trucks and 1 75, and charge impact fees for using county roads. 260 Expand Logan north to Bonita Beach Road 3/31/2021 7:47 AM 261 Something needs to be done and done quickly!!! 3/31/2021 7:19 AM 262 Both ideas are great. Please go for them! 3/30/2021 8:04 PM 263 Stop the excessive development and subsequent population growth turning Naples into Miami 3/30/2021 3:39 PM West. 264 Please do something as it's getting out of control. 3/30/2021 1:23 PM 265 No 3/30/2021 1:09 PM 266 The traffic congestion is very serious. Please proceed with these needed improvements 3/30/2021 12:45 PM 267 Complete Collier Blvd NORTH of Immokalee up to Bonita Beach Road immediately. Who 3/30/2021 9:17 AM 63/73 IMMOKALEE ROAD CORRIDOR CONGESTION STUDY PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT SURVEY thought making a dangerous U-turn north on the CVS/NCH on Collier Blvd was a good idea? IDIOTS! 268 As a biker, I worry about Logan Road. 3/30/2021 9:01 AM 269 Anything today can be done to improve the flow would be great. They may look confusing on 3/29/2021 8:44 PM paper to some, but they are simple to navigate when driving. 270 The backup is 175. You need to add a exit and entrance ramp north and south at Vanderbilt Rd. 3/29/2021 6:10 PM This will ease traffic off of Immoklee. Also need housing moratorium east of 175. 271 No 3/29/2021 6:06 PM 272 In Germany, if you go through a green light and adhere to the speed limit you will be able to 3/29/2021 12:22 PM know all light thereafter will be green when you arrive. Consider light sequencing on Immokalee as a first step now. 273 get it done soon! 3/29/2021 11:56 AM 274 Something definitely needs to be done ... I live off of Immokalee Road and its a nightmare trying 3/29/2021 8:35 AM to drive on it (especially trying to pull out of our community). Thank you for all your work on this. 275 Not in favor 3/29/2021 8:20 AM 276 This study is very much needed, thank you. Something also needs to be done about the noise 3/29/2021 7:44 AM from speeding and modified mufflers. Living off Immokalee Rd and close to Collier intersection has truly become a nightmare. We are considering selling our house that we love. 277 Something needs to be done about the traffic, especially as more and more homes and 3/28/2021 11:00 PM commercial space is developed along Immokalee. 278 More info is needed to determine usability 3/28/2021 10:31 PM 279 Growth has been poorly managed. Zoning laws have been ignored. Now we have a concrete 3/28/2021 8:05 PM jungle. We are losing our trees, our birds and animals, and our local charm. Sad. I strongly opposed the Immokalee overpass! 280 Stop the construction in Naples. It is clear the widening of Immokalee Rd in 2006 and the 3/28/2021 7:52 PM widening of Collier Blvd were never widened enough to handle the outvof control construction. Not only does the construction put demands on traffic , the ecosystem where some Florida's ordinal denizens used to live, black bears, snakes, alligators are beautiful shore boards. They are moving into gated communities and disrupting the lives of its human residents. Its putting huge demands on water and the power grid. Greed will destroyvthe beauty of one Florida's best loved cities. 281 Thank you for your efforts 3/28/2021 7:30 PM 282 Don't keep adding more lights to Immokalee Road. Instead make Vanderbilt Beach Road more 3/28/2021 6:19 PM accessible and extend it out to Oil Well Road, which will help to alleviate some of the traffic on Immokalee Road. 283 Anything is better than nothing. This area is so congested and will only get worse 3/28/2021 5:46 PM 284 1 agree with all of the recommendations and definitely will be a great improvement to this 3/28/2021 5:35 PM "Miami like" traffic 285 Get it done! 3/28/2021 5:13 PM 286 When will 951 Collier Blvd be completed to Bonita Beach RD? That would relieve some traffic 3/28/2021 5:11 PM that has to go to 1-75. 287 The easiest thing to do short term is increase the timing of the lights. Before and construction 3/28/2021 4:57 PM is done it would make a huge difference to do a traffic study and get the timing of the lights at different times of the day adjusted. As of right now the timing does not match the traffic flow 288 The biggest backups from Logan to 175 occur at the Valewood intersection. 3/28/2021 4:52 PM 289 What's in the 2040 plan we paid for? 3/28/2021 4:15 PM 290 Improvements to Logan Rd. from Immokalee to Bonita Beach Rd. will relieve pressure on the 1- 3/28/2021 4:00 PM 75/Immokalee Rd. interchange!! Also, the extension of Collier Blvd. northbound to Bonita 64/73 IMMOKALEE ROAD CORRIDOR CONGESTION STUDY PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT SURVEY Beach Rd. will become imperative as growth continues to the east of Collier Blvd.!!! 291 A friend shared it on facebook 3/28/2021 3:58 PM 292 You need to stop approving developments in this area. The Alura apartments should have 3/28/2021 3:57 PM never been allowed 293 Whatever will relieve the congestion will be an improvement. Immokalee Rd us just horribly 3/28/2021 3:29 PM congested, either direction, much of the time! 294 Why do they keep building residential and commercial property along Immokalee rd when it 3/28/2021 2:47 PM clearly can't accommodate the traffic!!! 295 This problem needs to be addressed as quickly as possible. 3/28/2021 1:59 PM 296 These all sound great, but please expand the rest of Collier blvd between Green blvd and City 3/28/2021 1:45 PM Gate Dr to 3 lanes. It goes from 3 lanes to 2 lanes to 4 lanes all within a mile or two. It makes absolutely no sense and causes so much congestion. 297 Any consideration for another on/off ramp for 175 at Vanderbilt? 3/28/2021 1:41 PM 298 Has there been consideration to adding on and off ramps to 75 at Vanderbilt? What about 3/28/2021 1:35 PM veterans memorial Blvd. Can this be connected to 75. As more housing is built east there needs to be more ways to access the highway. Broward County had similar issues as they built the West part of the county. Immokalee cannot continue to be the only east west corridor from 75 between Pine and Bonita Beach. 299 Too many issues with people blocking the intersections after the light has turned red. Causes 3/28/2021 12:15 PM more waiting and traffic and accidents. Maybe put some LEOs out there during rush hour to help people learn they cannot block intersections instead of sitting on Vanderbilt and 951 waiting for speeders all day. 300 Yes- QUIT BUILDING! Have access to 1-75 from Collier Blvd. So people do not have to drive 3/28/2021 11:28 AM all the way down west to get to 1-75. Better timing of Immokalee stop lights. Re route construction trucks- especially the big dump trucks. 301 Agree that something needs to be done but hate the idea of construction. What can be done 3/28/2021 11:27 AM about decreasing rear end collisions ? I must see 3 a week. Currently some drivers are using the extended right turn lanes to speed ahead of stopped traffic and then they try to merge back in to go straight. PLEASE STOP THIS DANGEROUS behavior. 302 The timing sequence of lights down immokalee rd at the intersections is terrible. The east west 3/28/2021 11:16 AM route should be timed better to allow stacked traffic to flow. Part of problem is drivers stopping 30 ft short of car in front so they can use cellphone and not hit person in front. The slack between cars creates huge delay. Maybe it is mostly poor or slow drivers during winter because I don't have near the problem when snowbirds leave. But give immokalle flow priority over north south street signals to improve flow and at school intersection (or gulf coast) Don't have much problem on north south street intersections. Just too many lights too close together around i75, Walmart 303 Something MUST be done to improve drive times AND there must be a moratorium on future 3/28/2021 10:30 AM development in the area. 304 More concerned at the speed on the immokalee /collier intersection. Waiting to turn left at cvs 3/28/2021 10:17 AM at the light your car literally shudders as traffic thunders by. This intersection is dangerous. Feel like a sitting duck. One lapse of concentration by a driver could result in a horrible outcome. It already has and the congestion and speed is much worse. Am thinking of moving home purely because of the traffic 305 1 just hope whatever is done works. I dread driving as I live right off of immokalee 3/28/2021 10:16 AM 306 We live in Heritage Greens. It is impossible to get out of our community also we have two 3/28/2021 9:40 AM schools right next to us. the only schools in Collier County that do not have yellow blinking lights for vehicles to slow down extremely dangerous something needs to be done about that 307 With all of the new home construction that is happening east of Naples. These fixes won't help 3/28/2021 8:36 AM unless there are more roads connected by bridges over all of the canals. Stop building new schools on Immokalee too!! 308 if they extend Vanderbilt Beach Road road east of Collier people going south could get off 3/28/2021 8:23 AM 65/73 IMMOKALEE ROAD CORRIDOR CONGESTION STUDY PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT SURVEY Immokalee earlier 309 We try our best to avoid this and other highly trafficked areas, but coming from the Estates, 3/28/2021 8:18 AM this is still the only option for 10 miles to reach 1-75. 310 Stop the Thursday, Friday, Saturday drag racing at Immokalee and Collier blvd 3/28/2021 7:47 AM 311 Do the lights stay green longer in the direction of rush hour. For example have lights stay green 3/27/2021 11:14 PM longer for westbound traffic in the morning then same for eastbound traffic in the afternoon. 312 Raise the money and make it happen. 3/27/2021 8:46 PM 313 On and off ramps at 75 and Vanderbilt would take the traffic off Immokalee and 75. 3/27/2021 7:46 PM 314 You need another ramp to 175. Maybe at Immokalee and Collier on side of CVS. Make another 3/27/2021 7:44 PM entrance / exit to 75 315 1 hope the study recommendations can be planned for and implemented. I travel Immokalee 3/27/2021 6:44 PM Rd. between Logan and Airport at least twice a day each way Monday through Friday. One major traffic issue I've noticed is accidents or traffic on 1-75 NB that cause backups on Immokalee Rd. both east and west bound. Are there any considerations being made for this? It is noticeably worse during the school year, and even more so during Season. 316 Strand Blvd/Juliet definitely needs attention. Thanks for working to improve the flow of traffic. 3/27/2021 5:32 PM It is extraordinarily difficult to travel on Immokalee during season for most hours of the day, and during rush hour, it's challenging every day. 317 Definitely worth it as a year round resident of Valencia Golf & Country Club. 3/27/2021 4:56 PM 318 1 intend on moving from a development located along Immokalee Road solely because the 3/27/2021 4:31 PM county has allowed unreasonable growth to occur with no planning for infrastructure, especially traffic. The commute to or from work on Immokalee Road of five miles takes upwards of one hour at least once per week. The construction at Immokalee Road and 951 will further complicate the issues. 319 Don't wait. Do something now before it gets unbearable. 3/27/2021 3:11 PM 320 The planning commission, obviously was out to lunch when permits were/are handed out to 3/27/2021 2:08 PM keep building without infrastructure in place. This is not new. 321 Flyover might work on Livingston ....straight up need more lanes on 75.... immokolle/75 only 3/27/2021 1:53 PM backs up because CRE can't get off of immokolle onto 75 when 75 backs up. 75 carries less cars than immokolle road.... 322 No 3/27/2021 1:35 PM 323 1 currently live at Livingston and Ravina Way and work at Immokalee and Goodlette-Frank - 3/27/2021 11:27 AM Immokalee Road definitely needs this. I also am building a home in what is known as Twin Eagles South so this is my main corridor for work. As you know, accidents are frequently on this road. Construction timing with the Vanderbilt Beach road extension should be considered since this East-West road will offset some of us 'work' commuters during construction. Thanks 324 Yes. The west bound Immokalee lanes to get to 1-75 NB start only after Northbrook/Tarpon Bay 3/27/2021 11:04 AM signal. The right only turn from Immokalee to Northbrook should be changed to straight and right. This will reduce the significant lane shifts between this signal and the i-75 intersection and redistribute traffic to more westbound lanes (people skip the right lanes) 325 North of Immokalee Road on Livingston a double lane traffic circle needs to be installed at 3/27/2021 10:35 AM Veterans Memorial. This intersection is going to become more and more congested when the apartments and new high school are completed. 326 Need an on/off ramp to 175 on Vanderbilt Beach Road. Don't do any construction during lam 3/27/2021 10:10 AM and 9pm. When one lane is closed it is a mess! 327 You can study this to death..over building with no consideration of traffic. Consider all the 3/27/2021 10:09 AM delivery, maintainace,utilities, etc has doubled if not tripled since Covid.Lived here since 1960,to say it's changed is an understatement 328 Yes, 10 years too late. 3/27/2021 9:38 AM 329 Build an on -off ramp for 75 in both direct at Vanderbilt Road. That'll keep people from feeding 3/27/2021 9:26 AM 66 / 73 IMMOKALEE ROAD CORRIDOR CONGESTION STUDY PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT SURVEY (funneling) to either Pine Ridge or immokalee. At the moment too much traffic funnels from other roads to get on the highway. 330 Stop building in the estates until increased traffic issues solved 3/27/2021 7:52 AM 331 no 3/27/2021 7:50 AM 332 Thanks and hurry 3/27/2021 7:08 AM 333 Immokalee is far too congested!!!! Strand Blvd access to Immokalee is not designed to handle 3/27/2021 6:23 AM the traffic load. With the forthcoming build out of commercial properties between Strand Blvd/Juliet and Livingston on Immokalee Rds south side, Immokalee traffic will go from really awful to intolerable!!! 334 Need to flow traffic north and south off of Immokalee using all points given the topography. 3/27/2021 5:58 AM 335 Something needs to change ASAP. The worst part of everyone's day is the traffic going home. 3/27/2021 5:29 AM You guys need to do a better job cause it's becoming an unstable roadway. Stop wasting money and make some changes. The light system is awful, the roads east of 75 need to be connected to Bonita beach road. More than just Logan. 951 and immokalee past oil well also needs to be connected to Bonita beach Road. If this is done all the congestion at 1-75 and Immokalee will relief from workers trying to get home. 336 Traffic in this area is among the worst in Naples. I'm thrilled something is finally going to be 3/26/2021 10:27 PM done. I strongly support these measures. 337 1 live in Esplanade, I'm a mom and drive this route daily for child's activities. Please think 3/26/2021 9:49 PM about the demographics of drivers. Other cities have bypasses and freeways. 1-75 traffic going to Marco should be routed east of 951 and the 1-75 should have more exits for city traffic. 338 Put an exit/entrance ramps at 1-75 and Vanderbilt Beach Rd. This will take pressure off of 3/26/2021 8:23 PM Immokalee and 1-75 and Pine Ridge and 1-75 exits. 339 commissioners need to listen to the people and not their OWN pockets and STOP additional 3/26/2021 7:33 PM development until infrastructure is built!! 340 Four lane Logan Rd all the way to Bonita Springs Rd 3/26/2021 7:25 PM 341 synchronize the traffic lights so there are less stopping in the morning rush and change for the 3/26/2021 7:22 PM evening rush hour. 342 Since Collier County does not want to get serious about limiting development, you are already 3/26/2021 6:30 PM behind the curve on what the problem will really look like in 20 years, not only on Immokalee but also Vanderbilt and Pine Ridge, from all development that will continue to be allowed east of Collier Blvd and Immokalee Rd northbound 343 Please make this area more bike and pedestrian friendly 3/26/2021 6:17 PM 344 Change the lights more frequently. 3/26/2021 5:25 PM 345 Sooner rather than later 3/26/2021 5:00 PM 346 6 month seasonal resident. 3/26/2021 4:54 PM 347 Appreciate the study and attention given to these issues. The traffic is horrendous and with 3/26/2021 4:52 PM recent area growth most definitely needs to be addressed. Having continuous follow/no light for lanes coming off of and onto 75 would also help ease congestion. Also the light at strand blvd and immokolee needs to the timing looked at, it has a very very long delay coming out of the community. 348 Exiting Strand Blvd. onto Immokalee needs to be addressed as well. Backups can be horriffic. 3/26/2021 4:50 PM 349 Instead of an overpass at Livingston, how about an overpass as an entrance and exit on 1 75? 3/26/2021 4:45 PM 350 You were talking about a right turn lane on Wink news from Oakes , there is already a right turn 3/26/2021 4:38 PM from Oakes onto Immokalee. May be a left turn(Westbiund) May work too 351 Stop building !!! 3/26/2021 4:27 PM 352 Please communicate with the local news so people know what's going on. Please work with 3/26/2021 4:22 PM contractors to schedule major work outside of holiday season peak times like thanksgiving and Christmas. Also, first week of back to school times, as there are several schools and 67/73 IMMOKALEE ROAD CORRIDOR CONGESTION STUDY PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT SURVEY daycares along that corridor. There are so many children in vehicles that go through here, including mine. Good luck! 353 Elevated 4-lane roadway (similar to gateway expressway in tampa) entire length between 3/26/2021 3:52 PM livingston and Logan. Only get on/off roadway at 75 and at livingston and Logan. Those that want to get off 75 for travel to juliet or strand, or other roadway between logan and livingston would exit as they do now. 354 1 heard about it on the Wink News website. I live in the study area. 3/26/2021 3:26 PM 355 These solutions seem ridiculous. Traffic is unbearable. I usually drive Vanderbilt to try to aboid 3/26/2021 3:21 PM Immokalee but that is just as crowded now too. I live at Immokalee and Wilson, so my choices are limited. 356 N/A 3/26/2021 3:17 PM 357 1 live near Immokalee and Collier. I hope the planned overpass there will be built soon. Traffic 3/26/2021 3:17 PM is a nightmare now on Immokalee all the way to 41. Thank you for asking. 358 Please get the improvements going. The area is a train wreck and especially the i75north 3/26/2021 3:13 PM ram p! 359 Wink News 3/26/2021 3:07 PM 360 Something needs to be done as immokalee rd is a mess in season. Thank you! 3/26/2021 3:06 PM 361 Anything that can be done to ease the congestion would be welcome. 3/26/2021 2:48 PM 362 It will be a good analysis if it actually leads to significant improvements in the area. 3/26/2021 2:45 PM 363 Please fix it as soon as possible. It is a huge headache for us, the Strand residents, to get 3/26/2021 2:33 PM home, or anywhere during season and during rush hour. Thank you! 364 Re doing the Massey Road widening would elevate some Immokalee Road congestion by 3/26/2021 2:12 PM diverting traffic to Vanderbilt Beach Rd. Massey is in bad condition. 365 Something more needs to be done at Valewood to keep people from blocking the intersection. 3/26/2021 1:55 PM 366 You need to address the traffic at Golden Gate high school and Inis Vove neighborhood. High 3/26/2021 1:45 PM school students use Ibis vove entrance to leave and arrive at school. There is no light at this intersection and no left hand turn opportunity. It is very dangerous for residents at Ibis Cove. 367 Abide by the land development plan and zoning laws. DO NOT continue with spot zoning by 3/26/2021 1:35 PM allowing amendments to those on a daily basis. The traffic, noise, pollution along the major arteries and along 1-75 is making living here unbearable. We have to yell at each other just to be heard in our lanais. It takes 20 minutes to go 4 miles to Target. It takes 30 minutes to go 2.5 miles to Home Depot. Yet, building and density continues in violation of the growth management plan, land development code and zoning laws. 368 It would be a ridiculous construction nightmare where there is no need!! 3/26/2021 1:27 PM 369 I'm in favor of any changes which will relieve congestion on Immokale 3/26/2021 12:56 PM 370 Something needs to be done with the constant congestion and ability to leave the strand with 3/26/2021 12:47 PM only one laying available to through traffic and turns 371 The problem is and Michael Lee Road too congested this is only a Band-Aid approach maybe 3/26/2021 12:28 PM you should try a double Dekker highway 372 The worst intersection is at Valewood 3/26/2021 12:28 PM 373 Pine ridge and airport is a cluster. Exit for 1-75 & Vanderbilt? Thank you 3/26/2021 11:44 AM 374 Traffic lights are timed very poorly or not at all especially during rush hours. Timing the lights 3/26/2021 9:46 AM for east -west flow would make a difference! 375 Need better syncing of traffic lights in that area. And police presence at peak times to prevent 3/26/2021 8:59 AM "blocking the box" which only makes traffic back ups worse. 376 The sooner you this this the better. You also need better enforcement. Some of the congestion 3/26/2021 8:31 AM is because drivers enter an intersection and then get caught by the light and block the traffic in other directions 68 / 73 IMMOKALEE ROAD CORRIDOR CONGESTION STUDY PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT SURVEY 377 Collier County and Florida in general is a desired place to live. This county is growing 10 fold 3/26/2021 7:41 AM and if infrastructure doesn't become a priority it's going to turn into the East cost. I lived in Washington DC for 4 years during college before coming back to Naples. Traffic in Naples is worse than it is there because they have the infrastructure. I understand that bridges and interchanges aren't pretty but people don't care. They don't want to sit in traffic all day because the county doesn't want to build a road that may be an eye sore. Please start building roads!! 378 Love the opportunity to participate and understand proposed changes before the construction 3/26/2021 7:06 AM begins. 379 Live 2 miles from Livingston intersection in study. Southbound traffic is getting very backed up 3/26/2021 3:41 AM in the mornings now. Seems likes there is an issue with the light timing in the am. 380 I'm glad something is trying to be done. While I don't have the answers I appreciate the effort 3/25/2021 8:18 PM to fix the problem 381 1 believe that the implementations on Immokalee are crucial and should be moved forward 3/25/2021 8:18 PM with. I think 175 @ Immokalee should be #1 focus and first project underway. The rest of the changes don't seem immediately necessary from my experience but I can see how lengthening turn lanes could be a huge help. 382 When reviewing the proposals, one has to wonder if a person has actually gone out to the 3/25/2021 8:07 PM locations and observed traffic. Four instance, extending the westbound left turn lane turning southbound onto Valewood has never been observed as an issue. In both the morning and afternoon heavy traffic hours, often traffic will back up through the intersections, especially at Valewood, where the vehicles will enter the intersection and not be able to clear before the light changes. This only multiplies the congestion for traffic trying intersect with uncleared vehicles blocking them. The solution - and a much more cost efficient one - would be to strictly enforce the "do not block intersection" traffic signs already in place. 383 Please please please pleasssssse do not do this project during season!!!!! I am not sure why 3/25/2021 7:55 PM but CC thinks road construction should be done during season at 8 am and 5 pm. Immokalee road is a nightmare already. Thank you for looking into making improvements but I think you need to make those improvements off season. 384 Stop building. The amount of construction that is planned off Immokalee Road east of Collier 3/25/2021 4:09 PM Blvd literally warrants that Immokalee Road become a freeway with exits at Collier Blvd, Logan, and Livingston Rd (in addition of course to 1-75). I'm fairly certain that homeowners such as my husband and I did not "sign up" to hear a multi- lane expressway in our backyard. There simply is not enough that can be done to mitigate the traffic from the planned outreach of development further East on Immokalee Road without a MAJOR change in Road infrastructure such as a multi- lane, multi -level freeway. Is THAT what the Collier County Development wants this area to look like???? The improvements being suggested are like ,.putting perfume on a pig", to write to quote my husband! 385 Sensible growth per acre developed HAS to be part of this discussion as road volume will 3/25/2021 3:26 PM never keep pace with population growth no matter how much we try. We must discuss limiting density and Developers MUST pay their fair share of these improvements! 386 Don't make people drive in oncoming directions, it is confusing and too complex. 3/25/2021 3:02 PM 387 About time! This is a very necessary. 3/25/2021 1:06 PM 388 If you are going to do major work on the roadways, please be considerate of the traffic in 3/25/2021 12:34 PM season. Doing this kind of work in season and mostly during the day will create major hardships for people. Any plans should look at maximizing work to be done between May and September with nighttime work being a predominant strategy. 389 Multiple right turn lanes from immokalee onto 1-75 when heading west on immokalee and going 3/25/2021 11:13 AM north on 175. A much longer approach onto 75 would help. Alternating lights so cars would merge from these two lanes onto 75 would also help. Many cities use these stop&go lights to control the merging, alternating green so one car at a time enters 75. 390 1 live 7 months / year just outside the study area (Collier Blvd 1/4 mile South of Immokalee. 1 3/25/2021 10:01 AM try to avoid that stretch as much as I can because of the traffic, both volume and speed differences. I support he suggestions provided and think they will help. 69/73 IMMOKALEE ROAD CORRIDOR CONGESTION STUDY PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT SURVEY 391 Please address the issues (noise and truck usage) on Logan Blvd between Immokolee and 3/25/2021 9:55 AM Bonita Beach Rd. 392 The number of cars that will be traveling Immokalee Rd due to new buildings (Lexus dealer, 3/25/2021 9:32 AM Senior Center, businesses at 951 and Immokalee, new Charter School, new developments along and off Immokalee) are going to compound the current problems. I think it is too late already and what you are proposing are just bandaids to the larger issue of uncontrolled growth along this corridor. 393 Increased congestion is also due to increased development in the Estates from Immokalee 3/25/2021 9:03 AM Rd. Since Immokalee Rd is the only way to enter into that area of the estates, and the only way to get to Immokalee and Ava Maria, the county needs to think about additional access points to these areas. Widening roads will only work for so long. There needs to be another exit off of 75 that will allow these residents to get to their homes without clogging up the Immokalee Rd exit. Think about 5-10 years from now, our population will triple. These are great ideas, but they are only bandaids to the real problem. 394 Very glad there is work underway to make improvements. It is definitely needed as the traffic 3/25/2021 8:45 AM is consistently getting worse. 395 1 had to put down an average of at least once a week - how about adding several times a 3/25/2021 8:36 AM month - your survey is a bit weak in surveying frequency - Help is needed immediately - anyone living east of 951 uses Immokalee all the time. Do not add huge villages east of 951 until you build roads to support them. Do not turn us into a Miami! 396 Please take into consideration the fact that tourists don't know where they are going. They 3/25/2021 8:33 AM don't accelerate to the speed limit and often don't realize they are approaching their intersection. Additional (larger) signage would be helpful, as would different timing on the lights during season and off season. One other thing: having sensor triggered lights between the major intersections that are not timed with the primary lights cause major traffic all over town. A light sbouldnt turn immediately for a side community or lesser light if the major flow of traffic has a green light. This happens on pine ridge, Vanderbilt and immokalee all the time. I used to live on The Lane near Livingston and immokallee and moved 5 years ago due to the congestion, after being rear ended .5 miles from home at a red light. I avoid immokalee at all costs and am really glad something is being done about it. Has any though been given to turning it into a full cross town highway from 75 to 41? Or another road for the same purpose? Since moving to the estates my travel time to 41 has doubled. Thank you for implementing this project and making our roads more suitable for our community! 397 putting a band -aid on a severed arm rarely works. Stay stupid and continue hiding down here in 3/25/2021 8:25 AM south Florida where incompetence pays off. How many more people have to die in car accidents around here before you start recognizing you people are to blame 398 Build an elevated, chain link enclosed, toll road from Bonita Beach Rd to Immokalee near Oil 3/25/2021 8:22 AM Well. The dead zone with boundaries of 1-75, Immokalee Rd, SR-29, SE-82, and Corkscrew Rd, is just too large. Elevate and enclose to protect wildlife. 399 The study is very important... I'm an 8 month resident. The traffic continues to get worse and 3/25/2021 8:16 AM worse. Collier needs to be opened to go north, and all the major intersections need to be worked on. I travel Livingston to Immokolee every day and both turn lanes to get onto immokalee in either direction are always all stacked up, especially in the am 8:30am and pm after 3... it takes at least two to three lights to get through the turn 400 Traffic is overwhelming during Season! 3/25/2021 7:53 AM 401 The traffic is very frustrating 3/25/2021 7:31 AM 402 Thank you for considering this area for traffic changes. It take roughly 15 minutes to get from 3/25/2021 7:22 AM valewood to Livingston between the 8-930a and 4-530p. The shopping centers adding more are adding more congestion, so anything would be an improvement since it's just getting worse. 403 We need the best outcome for traffic in this area. 3/25/2021 5:50 AM 404 We have more than enough traffic on Immokolee. Adding more development east of 1 75 is 3/25/2021 5:47 AM making it worse every year !!! 405 Extend the study to Immokalee and Collier intersection. 3/24/2021 10:42 PM 406 Why isn't extending Collier to Bonita Springs under consideration? 3/24/2021 10:28 PM 70 / 73 IMMOKALEE ROAD CORRIDOR CONGESTION STUDY PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT SURVEY 407 Any improvement to lessen the congestion is greatly appreciated! Also please keep in mind 3/24/2021 9:57 PM that bicycles need a safe space to ride too. 408 A good bit of the traffic appears to be coming from towns east of Collier Blvd. A more 3/24/2021 9:42 PM proactive effort would be another north/south corridor connecting Alligator Alley to north of the Caloosahatchee (sp) 409 Stop development going east. Immokalee Road and Vanderbilt Beach Road are the only east 3/24/2021 9:26 PM west roads and they are at capacity. Do a study at the entrance to Laurel Oaks and Gulf Coast High. Making a dangerous intersection worse with this plan. Study area not a quick fix that generates more problems. Get in your cars at 3 and head east. Experience is the best study!! 410 1 like the suggested improvements. One of the biggest problems is the blocking of 3/24/2021 8:38 PM intersections. I work off of Valewood and cannot get out of Valewood in the afternoon due to constant traffic in the intersection .... during season only. 411 This is long overdue, thankful it is finally being addressed. 3/24/2021 8:27 PM 412 Frequently cars turning left off Immokalee rd to 75N block Immokalee Rd especially between 4 3/24/2021 8:20 PM & 6:30 pm. Need police to help with traffic control. 413 Could a new on and off ramp at Vanderbilt Beach road and i-75 reduce the traffic at Immokalee 3/24/2021 8:18 PM and i-75 by 30%? 414 1 live off golden gate blvd and take 175 north to work. I always take the pine ridge road exit/on 3/24/2021 7:01 PM ramp due to the congestion during rush hour. Any improvements would be great! 415 No 3/24/2021 7:00 PM 416 Very concerned about the traffic at Logan/Immokalee. How will this affect the traffic at 3/24/2021 6:33 PM Treeline, especially when we are looking to put in a roundabout? 417 Get it done quickly 3/24/2021 6:18 PM 418 The study should not be between Logan and Livingston. It should extend to Collier Blvd. 3/24/2021 5:49 PM 419 Looks like a multi -year project that will degrade service level until complete. 3/24/2021 5:34 PM 420 We do need the bridge at Strand Blvd. widened to three lanes on the west side, one left, one 3/24/2021 5:33 PM right and one straight! 421 Safety first 3/24/2021 5:12 PM 422 Expedite the process as much as possible. 3/24/2021 5:08 PM 423 STOP BUILDING. YOU ARE RUINING NAPLES. 3/24/2021 4:41 PM 424 Perhaps a press release would get further distribution. 3/24/2021 4:38 PM 425 Thank you for trying to improve the traffic flow on Immokalee rd. Is there anything that can be 3/24/2021 4:22 PM done to reduce the traffic noise for homes that back up to or are near Immokalee Rd? Paris Smith-Higbie 2446 Butterfly Palm Dr. psmithhigbie@gmail.com 614-271-6140 426 Logan Blvd from Immokale rd north to Bonita Beach Road should NOT ALLOW heavy truck 3/24/2021 4:12 PM traffic. It is a 2 lane rd through residential areas and use by heavy trucking is extremely noisy and dangerous. Signs should be posted indicating NO THRU TRUCKING!! 427 We live just east of GCHS, so just out of the 1-mile area. There needs to be other ways to get 3/24/2021 4:11 PM north. The Logan extension helps some, but now there will be additional construction on Bonita Beach Road near or east of Logan. I have had times where it has taken 45 minutes or longer to go from GCHS to 1-75 north of Bonita Beach Road. Stop letting new subdivisions and towns be developed east of 1-75. The traffic is already terrible. Sometimes I have to sit for up to 5 minutes to get out of Laurel Lakes, if no one is there to trigger the light at GCHS. 428 It's all good. Much needed to help with growing traffic congestion in these areas especially 3/24/2021 3:56 PM Immokalee Road! 429 Thank you! It is really needed since they continue to build further out Immokalee Rd. 3/24/2021 3:38 PM 430 First step to relieve congestion is place moratorium on housing construction and allow road 3/24/2021 3:31 PM construction to proceed. Closing lanes will cause more traffic issues. 71/73 IMMOKALEE ROAD CORRIDOR CONGESTION STUDY PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT SURVEY 431 The fact that you took the option of expanding Immokalee Road off the table is outrageous. 3/24/2021 3:28 PM Using pilings to extend over the canal should be considered. 432 If we could get fly over ramps before the lights at strand and valewood to get on 75 it seems 3/24/2021 3:26 PM like that would alleviate a lot of issues, going straight east or west only seems congested because of everyone trying to get on an already backed up i75. Seems like the bigger issue is the MM 116 and 123 interchanges causing gridlock on 75 433 They very much need to take into account all of the growth/traffic coming east on immokalee 3/24/2021 3:26 PM rd 434 I'd like to see pedestrian bridges over Immokalee at Northbrooke Dr and Logan Blvd. It's 3/24/2021 3:02 PM dangerous to cross Immokalee for people walking to the stores and restaurants. 435 The sooner the better to approve and complete these projects. 3/24/2021 2:47 PM 436 It should consider issues further east on Immokalee and including Collier and further down east 3/24/2021 2:43 PM with all the new development happening as well. 437 Facebook post from someone sharing 3/24/2021 2:38 PM 438 1 am assuming that this study takes into account the massive growth planned for Ave Maria 3/24/2021 2:33 PM and other planned eastern Collier County communities. Also, why not expand the study to westward to include the intersection of Immokalee Road and Collier Blvd. 439 It sounds good. Something needs to be done, so I'm in favor of the effort. 3/24/2021 2:26 PM 440 1 saw a double stop light in Sarasota at a thruway over pass that helped traffic move faster 3/24/2021 2:14 PM Congestion at 75 is horrible and if there is an accident your day is over 441 Any improvements, including the ones considered, would help in alleviating congestion, more 3/24/2021 2:01 PM homes and strip malls are being built, it'll get worse before it'll get better unless traffic patterns are improved! 442 You are addressing the wrong problem. Immokalee Road cannot handle the increasing demand 3/24/2021 2:00 PM to get to 175. Vanderbilt Beach Road must have access to 75 and Collier Blvd must access it. Development East of Collier Blvd must stop until those changes are made. 443 Immokalee rd is & always has been a mess. The intersection at Livingston & Immokalee rd is 3/24/2021 2:00 PM absolutely horrible during season. Sometimes you miss the lights in the turn lane turning onto Immokalee rd due to the straight lanes clogging it up. It has been so bad that I won't take Livingston home from Bonita (work) anymore. You spend alot of time waiting on lights o congestion to clear to make a light. 444 No. Just a suggestion, Tamiami tail road needs to be worked on. There are so many bumps 3/24/2021 1:49 PM and holes that eventually wear down our cars. Thank you 445 Coming from the estates it is very difficult in the morning as the only route to 75 is immokalee 3/24/2021 1:32 PM road. There are many morning that I have to leave very early to accommodate for traffic. As more people move east the traffic is only going to get more difficult to control. I definitely feel that changes need to be made 446 Thank you for looking into this very congested area. I hope you are able to address some of 3/24/2021 1:12 PM these issues before the additional developments off Immokalee past Wilson start to be built and inhabited. 447 Strand Blvd. needs three lanes one left turn one right turn lastly a straight lane 3/24/2021 1:09 PM 448 Consider other options to aid in East to West congestion, not North to South. 3/24/2021 11:51 AM 449 Long overdue 3/24/2021 11:29 AM 450 Thanks for asking. 3/24/2021 11:06 AM 451 You need to stop building new house in along Immokolee! That would help with congestion. 3/24/2021 10:35 AM Every home built East of Collier Rd has to commute on Immokolee to do almost everything. 452 Given all the new development you continue to approve, you can't do this fast enough! Are you 3/24/2021 10:28 AM considering the thousands of homes planned for east of this corridor? Has any consideration been given to 75/Vanderbilt interchanges or slip ramps? It's absurd to think that we can 72 / 73 IMMOKALEE ROAD CORRIDOR CONGESTION STUDY PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT SURVEY consider these roads safe and commutable in the forseeable future with the band aids you are proposing. 453 Add interchange at 1-75 and Vanderbilt. 3/24/2021 10:21 AM 454 You actually need to fix the flow coming into Collier intersection down to logan. It's dangerous 3/24/2021 10:11 AM and drivers act like it's freeway 455 1 think this study will prove the traffic on immokolee rd has become unreasonable and will 3/24/2021 9:42 AM continue to be so unless something productive is done. Thanks! 456 Please do something to keep the flow of traffic moving. Stop lights only hurt the people trying 3/24/2021 9:40 AM to get out onto immokalee road. 457 1 assume Seasonal Residents opinions won't matter one bit to Collier County. 3/23/2021 7:01 PM 458 Too much building and adding to already congested roads. Will look like Miami very soon. 3/23/2021 7:39 AM 459 Left hand turns need to be longer at Livingston and Immokalee. 3/22/2021 6:25 PM 460 1 appreciate the County's continuous improvement to traffic patterns and timing. 3/22/2021 3:12 PM 461 Please do not do what that have in Sarasota @ 1-75 and the mall , we have too many seniors 3/22/2021 2:27 PM and out of town people in naples compared to the much younger Lakewood ranch population up there . Older brains would not understand that configuration and people would be killed and accidents would always be happening! 462 Yeah.. help!!! :) 3/22/2021 2:24 PM 463 Happy you are trying to figure this out! 3/22/2021 10:39 AM 73 / 73 Respondent Start Date Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question Question 5 Question Question Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 a. b. C. d. ID 4 6 7 Direct notification from At At HOA, Lorraine Lantz has been fantastic with helping me under stand the project I don't least At least At least At least least friend, better and explaining what exactly is going to happen. At first I was hesitant Love them. They are very know what once a once a once a once a once a Year -Round neighbor, but after understanding what is a being done, I have realized the project 1.2791E+10 7/2/2021 About time! Yes easy to maneuver. that is. week week week week week No Yes Resident etc.... seems to be very beneficial. You should stop approving all this building in collier county in North I live at Amberton Townhomes. The noise is ridiculous here. My daughter has to go Naples. The traffic is already a Less sleep at her friends house every evening because the noise and traffic is so bad she nightmare. Why are you than cannot sleep. How dare you even think about adding more traffic to this mess. You This is not going to help. If anything ppl continuing to add to the Every once a Year -Round should have to build sound barriers at your cost along on the communities that live 12729341120 6/9/21 will use immokalee road even more. Yes problem. This is just a band aid. day Every day Every day Every day month Yes Yes Resident Social media on this road. Fix the entrance on to immokalee rd from heritage greens. Everyday it is a constant struggle to get out and make the uturn. No one obeys the don't block the box signs Every Every Year -Round or yields to let you cross. This is getting worse every year and there is nothing being 12710965543 6/3/21 N/a Yes day Every day Every day Every day day Yes No Resident Social media done to help out residences leave our community safely Direct This doesn't appear to impact notification residential areas around this from HOA, Many residents feel that there is far too much construction in the adjacent vicinity. diverging diamond. What is this At least At least At least At least friend, We moved here to avoid the congestion. We were under the impression that How will the noise from this overpass I don't supposed to provide? It looks once a once a once a once a Year -Round neighbor, Naples had been built out, and new construction was being put on hold to avoid the 12705143537 6/1/21 affect Carlton Lakes? know complicated. month Every day month month week Yes Yes Resident etc.... strain on our resources. What is up with all this??? Seasonal Direct Resident notification (temporary from HOA, At least At least residence at friend, once a once a least 1 month neighbor, I find the pictures difficult to visualize. Maybe a video of already existing one 12695196232 5/28/21 No IEveryday Everyday imonth month Yes No per year) etc.... would be good to compare. What kind of road closures should we expect. Direct notification from HOA, friend, Every Every Year -Round neighbor, 12695173780 5/28/21 Yes day Every day Every day Every day day Yes No Resident etc.... There is no exit into Livingston as one approaches on Immokalee going East. It will be virtually impossible to exit from At least At least At least Carlton Lakes due to continuous traffic once a once a once a Every Year -Round Email 12694928806 5/28/21 flow on Livingston Rd. Yes week Every day week month day Yes No Resident notification Logan needs Direct What about establishing an 1-75 to be made notification interchange at Vanderbilt Beach Rd. That wider all the from HOA, would be a major E/W traffic relief for Yes.... Planning commision always way to At least At least friend, North Naples. The 1-75 overpass at seems to follow developers. Not Vanderbilt once a once a Every Year -Round neighbor, 12688103473 5/26/21 Vanderbilt already exists. Yes the other way. Unfortunate. Beach rd. week Every day Every day week day Yes Yes Resident etc.... Not enough info on alternative solutions.and other pathways to helf traffic flow. Respondent Question Question 5 Question Question Start Date Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 a. b. C. d. ID 4 6 7 Direct notification from HOA, At least friend, Every once a Every Year -Round neighbor, 12687748244 5/26/21 day Every day Every day 1week day Yes IResident etc.... I think that before that is considered, a light should definitely be installed at the north gate. It's an "accident Direct waiting to happen ", likely a notification Customers from the dreaded "Seed to death. I have folks who won't Less from HOA, Table ". Are constantly cutting off persons come to see me due to the fact At least At least At least than friend, traveling South on Livingston Road That that getting across Livingston once a once a once a once a Year -Round neighbor, 12686604665 5/25/21 U- turn should be closed off. Yes Road is so dangerous. month Every day week month imonth Yes INo Resident etc.... Please consider a traffic light at the North Gate of Carlton Lakes. Direct notification from HOA, At least At least At least friend, Every once a once a once a Year -Round neighbor, 12686155895 5/25/21 Yes day Every day week month week Yes No Resident etc.... Seasonal Direct Resident notification (temporary from HOA, At least At least At least residence at friend, How long can we expect construction to take? The delays from all of this look Continuous Flow Intersection seems less Every once a once a once a least 1 month neighbor, horrible for residents of this area. Especially for residents of Carlton Lakes who have 12684576915 5/25/21 costly and quicker to build. No day Every day week imonth week Yes INo per year) etc.... no way to avoid the construction backups. Less than At least Less than once a once a once a Every Year -Round Email 12684341158 5/25/21 Yes month Everyday week month day Yes No Resident notification Direct notification from HOA, At least At least friend, Every once a once a Year -Round neighbor, 12681819265 5/24/21 Yes day Every day Every day week week Yes No Resident etc.... Seasonal Direct Resident notification Naples needs more local roads & another (temporary from HOA, lane on 175. A bridge will destroy the residence at friend, The 175 area is now too congested. It was once partially vacant & beautiful. It is now character of Carlton Lakes &other least 1 month neighbor, congested and ugly. The water slide park was once awesome to walk through. It is 12680668871 5/23/21 communities in the area. No Yes INo per year) etc.... now bordered by houses. Direct notification from HOA, At least friend, Main problem is time getting thru Livingston Rd while on Immokalee Rd whether Every once a Every Year -Round neighbor, heading west or east on Immokalea, & coming on Immokalea heading west from 12679938363 5/22/21 day Every day Every day week day Yes No Resident etc.... Tarpon Bay Blvd Respondent Start Date Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question Question 5 Question Question Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 a. b. C. d. ID 4 6 7 At least Every once a Every Year -Round 12679627412 5/22/21 Yes day Every day Every day week day Yes Yes Resident Social media Direct notification from HOA, At least At least Less than At least friend, Will it be difficult to enter Carlton Lakes I don't once a once a once a once a Year -Round neighbor, I know a change to traffic flow is necessary to reduce congestion, just hope it 12674528699 5/20/21 development? know week month month week Yes No Resident etc.... doesn't affect property values in Carlton Lakes development. At least At least Every once a once a Year -Round 12670495131 5/19/21 Yes day Every day Every day month week No Yes Resident Social media Direct notification from HOA, friend, Every Every Year -Round neighbor, We need to get traffic moving on Immokalee. This is a wise investment for the 12667021951 5/18/21 1 think it is a great idea. day Every day Every day Every day day Yes No Resident etc.... future. The title is Immokalee Rd. congestion. The issue is the east -west traffic. Put the flyover that direction. The light patterns are horrible as well. The interstate isn't really an issue until the everyday accident happens north or south of Immokalee Direct Road. Typical Collier County Band-Aids. notification Re -active instead of Pro -active with your from HOA, decisions. You hand out building permits friend, like candy with no vision as to what the This is ridiculous. I have been on Every Every Year -Round neighbor, 12666572367 5/18/21 infrastructure may need. Yes University Drive. day Everyday lEveryday Every day day Yes IYes Resident etc.... Too late to manage it properly. Do what you do. Proposed apt. Complex on Juliet Blvd. and Immokalee Rd. Will add to the Most traffic is headed up Immokalee At least Less than Collier congestion impacting Livingston Rd. But will adversely impact Immokalee Rd traffic. going East to Rt 75, not so much on I don't Every once a once a Every Year -Round County It's already a bottle neck and bumper to bumper most of the day. New apt. Bldg. 12665332591 5/18/21 Livingston Rd. Going north or south. know day Every day week month day Yes No Resident website very bad idea and will severely impact traffic. Wouldn't it make more sense to have At least At least Collier Immokalee the fly over as most of the once a once a Every Year -Round County 12664823077 5/18/21 traffic is going to and from the highway? No week Every day Every day week day Yes No Resident website I hope the committee considers our opinions Seasonal Direct Resident notification (temporary from HOA, At least At least At least residence at friend, Yes. It's a pity this survey wasn't done 10 years ago and before Seeds to Table was once a once a once a least 1 month neighbor, allowed to build at Immokalee and Livingston. This only made the congestion 1266371529715/17/21 month Every day Imonth week IYes No per year) etc.... 1worse. Direct notification It should not be constructed this close to our community. Carlton Lakes. This type from HOA, construction should be planned where there is no community close. Something is At least Less than friend, needed to stop this congestion, but this is not it. Stopping development would Every once a once a Every Year -Round neighbor, have been a great idea a couple of years ago until new traffic patterns could have 12663667553 5/17/21 No day Every day month month day Yes No Resident etc.... been constructed. Very Poor Planning Respondent Question Question 5 Question Question Start Date Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 a. b. C. d. ID 4 6 7 Direct notification from HOA, At least friend, Every once a Every Year -Round neighbor, 12663399637 5/17/21 Yes Iday Every day Every day 1week day Yes No lResident etc.... Direct It cut down congestion in the city notification where I used it but required from HOA, adjustment by the drivers. It may At least At least At least At least friend, be difficult for all of the elderly once a once a once a once a Year -Round neighbor, 12663360415 5/17/21 Yes drivers in Collier. week Every day week month week Yes Yes Resident etc.... Seasonal The Veteran's Parkway needs to be Resident extended to the east of 75. More traffic (temporary Additional access from the east of 75 needs to be added. Additionally as a resident flow needs to move through Vanderbilt residence at of Carlton Lakes we have needed a light for access to Livingston for years. I don't Road. Just working on the Immolkalee Every Every least 1 month Email see this in the plans. This is an very expensive plan and does not address the core 12661210934 5/16/21 road will not solve the problem. Yes Confusing day I Every day Iday Yes No I per year) notification issue of additional access from the east of 75. Direct notification from HOA, At least At least friend, Every once a once a Every Year -Round neighbor, 12660101760 5/16/21 Yes day Every day week month day Yes No Resident etc.... Direct notification from HOA, friend, I don't Every Every Year -Round neighbor, 12652119665 5/13/21 know day Every day Every day Every day day Yes No Resident etc.... Limiting the number of new communities construction on immokalee rd as a tax payer, i/we pay hugh amounts of $$ for educated experts to study and recommend solutions. those people are hired by our elected officials. I/we have no choice but to trust good recommendations are made and elected At least At least officials should be held accountable. I Every once a once a Every Year -Round 12640802087 5/8/21 would not have a clue. Yes day Every day week 1week day Yes IResident Social media Direct notification from HOA, At least At least At least At least friend, once a once a once a once a Year -Round neighbor, 12630202283 5/5/21 week month month week No No Resident etc.... I'm glad these problems are being addressed. At least At least Collier Every once a once a Every Year -Round County 12625257633 5/3/21 Yes day week week Every day day No Yes Resident website I for see many accidents due to At least At least This will just encourage more speeding on people driving in the wrong Every once a once a Every Year -Round 12624684148 5/3/21 Livingston Road. Yes direction. day Every day week month day Yes Yes Resident Social media Should have done this years ago! Respondent Question Question 5 Question Question Start Date Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 a. b. C. d. ID 4 6 7 At least At least At least I don't Every once a once a once a Year -Round 12624067993 5/3/21 No overpass! know day Every day week month week Yes Yes Resident Social media Seasonal Direct Resident notification (temporary from HOA, Would help but need to address traffic Too many disadvantages. Very At least At least At least At least At least residence at friend, back up on Immokalee from Rt 41 to confusing especially with so once a once a once a once a once a least 1 month neighbor, Study should include areas West on Immokalee Starting at 41 or at least Airport Rd. 12623204877 5/2/21 Livingston also. Yes many older drivers. month week 1week month week Yes INo per year) etc.... There is already heavy traffic there every day - especially from 3-7 pm. Seasonal Direct Is this a Resident notification longer left (temporary from HOA, turn lane? I At least At least residence at friend, am in favor Every once a once a Every least 1 month neighbor, 12620928938 5/1/21 No Iof that. day week week Every day day Yes INo per year) etc.... 1-75 and Immokalee plans seem highly unusual and impossible. Direct notification Less from HOA, than At least At least At least friend, once a once a once a once a Year -Round neighbor, 12620738176 5/1/21 It's a great idea! No month Every day month month week Yes No Resident etc.... Direct notification from HOA, friend, Every Every Year -Round neighbor, 12617781554 4/30/21 Yes Iday Every day Everyday lEveryday day No INo Resident etc.... Direct notification from HOA, friend, Every Every Year -Round neighbor, 12617548364 4/30/21 Yes day Every day Every day day No No Resident etc.... Seasonal Resident (temporary At least At least At least Less than At least residence at once a once a once a once a once a least 1 month 12617233270 4/30/21 week week week imonth week Yes INo per year) Social media Appreciate the survey because traffic is bad and getting worse Not familiar with this I do not believe this is going to type of CFI I do not believe the issue is N/S but E/W resolve the issue and will only so unable to At least At least At least At least Collier and worst east of Livingston until the 1-75 cause further confusion and slow- provide Every once a once a once a once a Year -Round County 12616619140 4/30/21 interchange. Yes downs. comments. day week week week week Yes Yes Resident website Respondent Question Question 5 Question Question Start Date Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 a. b. C. d. ID 4 6 7 1 suggest the people looking into this should drive it constantly Direct at different notification times of the from HOA, I do use exit 136 as I go to BJ's day to get At least At least At least At least At least friend, warehouse. But it takes forever their own once a once a once a once a once a Year -Round neighbor, Yes, please make sure it doesn't take too long to make a change/improvement to 12614832114 4/29/21 Anything will be better than what it is No Ito get off the exit. take month week week Imonth week No INo Resident etc.... this nightmare. Atleast At least once a once a Year -Round I can't even take a left out of Willoughby Acrrs onto Immokolee after 4:00 because 12614245098 4/29/21 month Every day week Yes No Resident Social media cars block the intersection. Sarasota interchange works perfectly and keeps traffic Every Every Year -Round 12614024842 4/29/21 Yes flowing smoothly. day Every day Every day Every day day Yes Yes Resident Social media Direct notification from HOA, friend, Every Every Year -Round neighbor, 12612957889 4/28/21 No day Every day Every day Every day day Yes No Resident etc.... At least Less than once a once a Every Year -Round 12612254416 4/28/21 Yes month Every day Every day month day Yes Yes Resident Social media At least Less than Every once a once a Every Year -Round This is a horrible situation and the planned Vanderbilt extension isn't going to be 12612131288 4/28/21 No day Every day week month day Yes No Resident Social media enough to remedy it Collier Every Every Year -Round County Stop building all these developments. We have more than enough people here. The 12611420575 4/28/21 day Every day Every day day Yes Yes Resident website little town of naples is gone forever sad very sad. Direct notification from HOA, At least Atleast Atleast At least At least friend, It might help but the izsue is around the I hear tHat the design is an once a once a once a once a once a Year -Round neighbor, 12611231247 4/28/21 big box stores and 175 I'chg. No improvement. week week week month week Yes Yes Resident etc.... Far to late to be adxressing the issue. At least At least At least Atleast Atleast once a once a once a once a once a Year -Round 12610737297 4/28/21 No week week week month month Yes No Resident Social media Im at the very least happy that studies are being done. This winter has been the worse I can't believe we are going to have a Lexus dealership on Immkolee as well At least Less than Collier fairly soon. To add to the congestion!! You can't go in the road between 2:30 & Every once a once a Every Year -Round County 5:30 anymore. It took me one day 45 mins to go from strand Publix to Huntington 12610681569 4/28/21 day Every day month month day Yes No Resident website lakes!! I Atleast Atleast Every once a once a Every Year -Round We do not need to develop every square inch of Collier County or we will become 12610672779 4/28/21 day Every day week month day Yes Yes Resident Social media Broward West. Commissioners need to stop approving over development ASAP! Respondent Question Question 5 Question Question Start Date Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 a. b. C. d. ID 4 6 7 At least Every once a Every Year -Round 12610608459 4/28/21 It is exactly what we need. Yes day Every day week day Yes No Resident Social media Seasonal Resident (temporary At least residence at Every once a least 1 month Planners need to realize that north/south thoroughfares are in short supply. You 12610367548 4/28/21 Yes Iday Every day Everyday lEveryday week Yes INo per year) Social media can't keep building without taking in consideration traffic, roads, school, etc Immokalee road is failing. Developmen t east of 951 At least At least At least At least At least should be once a once a once a once a once a Year -Round 12610243881 4/28/21 Yes Yes put on hold. month week week 1week week No INo Resident Social media At least Collier Every once a Every Year -Round County We need to keep this area as a route not a major thoroughfare. Put some emphasis 12610168276 4/28/21 Yes day Every day Every day week day Yes No Resident website on the other roadways to help instead. Direct notification Less from HOA, At least At least At least At least than friend, once a once a once a once a once a Year -Round neighbor, 12610142525 4/28/21 Sounds good Yes Not sure None week week week imonth month Yes INo Resident etc.... Direct As long as it's not confusing . notification Most of the transient drivers are from HOA, As a Naples Native , born here , it hurts to see us expanding so much that our on vacation and drive as such . At least At least At least At least At least friend, wildlife and beautiful little town becoming a little Miami. As a construction Most cannot handle a simple It's probably once a once a once a once a once a Year -Round neighbor, professional I think the roadways definitely need help for the mass amount of 12610115653 4/28/21 Love it ....great idea NEEDS DONEM! M No round about. a good idea week week week week week No Yes Resident etc.... people coming. At least At least At least Less than At least I don't once a once a once a once a once a Year -Round Email 12609904498 4/28/21 know week week week month month Yes No Resident notification I live here, I can get use to it, however, snow birds, I can see a At least At least At least At least At least lot of problems with them not once a once a once a once a once a Year -Round 12609743080 4/28/21 No being able to handle it. week week week week month No No Resident Social media Thank you for trying to solve the problem. It will definitely be needed once the apartments/ condos and the new Naples high school are built on North Livingston This area is At least At least At least At least rd. Seed To Table parking lot will be a cat a congested once a once a once a once a Year -Round Fix this mess. I have the Collier County sheriffs departments pulse point app on my 12609335682 4/27/21 bus stop as well! No nightmare month Every day week week week Yes No Resident Social media phone and it is a continuous flow of accidents Direct notification from HOA, friend, Every Every Year -Round neighbor, 12609324674 4/27/21 Yes day Every day Every day Every day day No No Resident etc.... Respondent Question Question 5 Question Question Start Date Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 a. b. C. d. ID 4 6 7 At least I don't Every once a Every Year -Round 12609305988 4/27/21 know day Every day month Every day day Yes Yes Resident Social media Immokalee Road is too congested and dangerous I am not a supporter of overpasses. The I am in favor one at Airport- Pulling and Golden Gate is of this At least At least At least At least At least oppressive and too strongly carves up the I am in full support of this design once a once a once a once a once a Year -Round Rein in the county commissioners who are continuously and irresponsibly approving 12609301338 4/27/21 neighborhood. Yes measure. solution. week week week week week Yes No Resident Social media developments along this extended corridor. Seasonal Resident Less (temporary than Less than At least Less than At least residence at Collier once a once a once a once a once a least 1 month County 12609199142 4/27/21 No No month month month imonth month No INo per year) website Not familiar with this type of intersection; Respectfully, most of the Commissioners do not take traffic concerns into however, if consideration. The people doing traffic studies have lied about the traffic issues to it will help developers get their projects through and it is concerning. We are turning into We definitely need something to improve the Gulf Coast Miami with the traffic. Improvements to traffic should be started move traffic along Immokalee Rd flow of At least At least before the development of building projects and should be paid for by the Something like this is desperately needed in all directions and getting on I- traffic then once a once a Every Year -Round developers and not the Collier County tax payers due to their plans overburdening 12609172869 4/27/21 even today during season. Yes 175. it is needed. week Every day Every day 1week day Yes IYes Resident Social media the roadways with excessive traffic. At least At least At least At least At least Stop approving more housing in panther territory, let's have less development! But once a once a once a once a once a Year -Round we also do need to improve the traffic on the Immokolee corridor, to better handle 12609141039 4/27/21 Yes, please do it! Fast! Yes Yes! Do it! Fast! week week week month week Yes No Resident Social media the traffic we have today. At least I don't Every once a Every Year -Round Traffic is horrific on Immokalee Road. Our commissioners should stop approving 12609061873 4/27/21 know day Every day week day Yes Resident Social media new developments until we have a better way to handle traffic congestion At least Bad idea, too confusing to EEv:ery once a Every Year -Round 12608949499 4/27/21 No comment Yes change sides of the road Do it day Every day week day Yes No Resident Social media Respondent Start Date Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question Question 5 Question Question Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 a. b. C. d. ID 4 6 7 This looks like a peculiar solution that only a traffic engineer rather than Naples drivers are likely to love. The unfamiliar is just as dangerous to life and limb as crowded conditions. Drivers experiencing this kind of configuration for the first time are truly dangerous, and unlike many places where there is Unable to create congestion, this figure out intersection with continually what this Direct The problem is the traffic flow on have new drivers exposed to the looks like. notification More east west connector's are needed, for the current traffic as well as future Immokalee Road rather than on configuration because of the Unusual from HOA, projections. But the county planners and developers I've pretty much made that Livingston. The East West traffic is too tourist nature of the community. usually At least friend, impossible.If it can be said that speed kills, it can also be said that greed slows us to intense for the number of lanes that Don't do weird Things to the equals Every once a Every Year -Round neighbor, a crawl And makes us cranky. Those who develop some land take their money and 12608922580 4/27/21 currently exist Yes Itraffic flow unsafe. day Everyday lEveryday month day No INo Resident etc.... run, the rest of us sit in traffic and wait Big improvement on what we have now. We really need more East/ West roadways if all the developments are going to happen in the eastern County. We also ned more North /South Yes, This would help but it would also roadways East of 175. Lets make speed up the traffic which would then the developers of the Eastern Better then At least At least bottleneck at 175 and the 5 traffic lights at County pay for these roads as what is Every once a once a Every Year -Round Anyway we can reduce the amount of traffic lights will help move traffic along, look 12608776084 4/27/21 that site. Yes Ithey are causing the need. there now. day Every day 1week month day No INo Resident Social media down the road and see what can be done to keep it flowing. Stop building! Take some of the traffic off Immokalee by extending the road behind the I hate it. You are ruining what once was a Strand for a Direct lovely part of town. We have lived off You pride yourself on Naples new exit or notification Immokalee Road for nearly 30 years . It being some quiet oasis. The extend the from HOA, was once quiet and lovely. Now it's beaches are so crowded that you road down At least At least At least At least friend, becoming like Miami. Stop this foolish have to get there mighty early to by Marbella once a once a once a once a Year -Round neighbor, It is time to stop saying yes to every project put in front of you. You are ruining this 12608615749 4/27/21 need to build on every scrap of land, Yes Iget on. Lakes. week Every day week 1week week Yes INo Resident etc.... town big time! Better than what we have now, At least At least which was poor planning in the once a once a Every Year -Round 12608610010 4/27/21 If it will help with traffic flow then I agree. Yes first place. week Every day Every day week day Yes Yes Resident Social media Respondent Start Date Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question Question 5 Question Question Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 a. b. C. d. ID 4 6 7 Very helpful but extremely difficult during construction. I would support this but it At least Less than will be expensive and how or who will pay The answer is a duplication of my Every once a once a Every Year -Round Development of the county is out of control based on infrastructure. Why do 12608603833 4/27/21 for it? Yes previous response. day Every day week month day Yes No Resident Social media planning studies implement them and ignore them and whatever developers want? Direct notification from HOA, At least At least friend, Every once a once a Every Year -Round neighbor, 12608533833 4/27/21 No day month Every day month day No No Resident etc.... Stop building east and ruining the Everglades. Direct notification This looks dangerous. How have from HOA, Whatever needs to be done, make sure it can be done safely, with consideration of previous implementations of the At least At least friend, the population around here and how well they will take the new driving changes. DDI turned out? We're people ok Every once a once a Year -Round neighbor, And the time of year construction needs to be done so that we can still commute to 12608507338 4/27/21 No 1with it? Any increase in accidents? day Everyday lEveryday month week Yes INo Resident etc.... school and work appropriately. At least Every once a Every Year -Round 12608498574 4/27/21 No day Every day Every day week day Yes No Resident Social media Having lived here thirty-five years nothing surprises me with regard to allowances for placing cart before horse. Millions spent on studies to no avail. Bottom -line is on the Livingston Overpass what alternative is there? Overpasses and similar big city transportation features while certainly likely safer and more efficient most certainly diminish the unified small town we enjoyed up until maybe a decade ago. However, folks Thank you for your efforts. Best of luck. Growth is inevitable. Quality growth that have the right to live where they choose maintains or makes a solid effort of retaining the character of the community is in America. Elected officials however welcome. No reasonable opposition to growth plans as proposed would be a should do deep thinking on what impacts disaster for SWFL's future! The state comp plan of maybe Twenty-five years ago in long term what the continued impact of seems to have been greatly amended. Fortunately core features which are evident such high growth means not only on on new or expanded roads are generally honored at least leaving new an expanded roads but of course, environment, wildlife At least At least At least At least At least road regional system for the most part with no linear never ends commercial (what wildlife? once a once a once a once a once a Year -Round Email development along an entire road uninterrupted with gas stations, banks, retail, 12608492345 4/27/21 % 0 % �R Z W W 4)5 �Z fo) No week 1week week week week IYes Yes I Resident notification etc... I do not want an overpass at immokalee rd. I live in willoughby acres. That will At least Stop trying to overdevleop Naples. This isn't Miami. It has changed so much in the destroy our community. The golden gate Every once a Every Year -Round 15 yrs I've lived here. All the nice wooded lots are being torn down for gated 12608456916 4/27/21 through way is an eyesore. Yes day Every day Every day week day Yes No Resident Social media communities & strip malls. Naples is becoming ugly. Respondent Question Question 5 Question Question Start Date Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 a. b. C. d. ID 4 6 7 Seasonal Direct Resident notification (temporary from HOA, At least At least At least residence at friend, once a once a once a least 1 month neighbor, 12608356009 4/27/21 week week 1week Yes INo per year) etc.... this is a this is also backwards, it is decent The main issue is people commuting from the estates or from ft myers to work, imokolee that needs the traffic proposal their main point of access is the interstate from immokalee, if there was interstate relief not livingston. people are and might access at vanderbilt beach rd it would alleviate the pressure put on exit 111 but trying to get to the interstate alleviate some portion. also it would make sense for the proposed overpass to go east/west terrible idea, if anything imokolee should from imokolee that is the issue, some At least At least At least At least Collier instead of north south. and if the school zoning was looked at there would be a go over livingston all the way to the not people traveling nb or sb on congestion Every once a once a once a once a Year -Round County large group of homes west of 75 that could be zoned for barron rather than gulf 12608350711 4/27/21 interstate Yes Ilivingston on imokolee day week 1week week week IYes Yes Resident website coast which would eliminate a ton of local traffic due to school events. At least once a Every Year -Round Email 12608286560 4/27/21 week day Yes No Resident notification This looks unnecessarily complicated and confusing. I don't understand what I'm seeing in the diagram - how does one At least At least drive straight on Immokalee No once a once a Every Year -Round 12607484487 4/27/21 This seems reasonable. I like this proposal. No 1without getting on or off 75? comment. week Every day Every day imonth day Yes INo Resident Social media At least At least At least Every once a once a once a Year -Round 12607480608 4/27/21 Yes day Every day week month week Yes No Resident Social media At least At least At least At least Only the beginning of addressing the How is this any different from once a once a once a once a Year -Round There needs to be another east/west road to 75. Immokalee after 3pm is a parking 12607322460 4/27/21 issue. No what is there now ? week week week week Yes No Resident Social media lot. Direct notification from HOA, The biggest problem or concern is the possible addition of the large communities in At least At least At least At least At least friend, eastern Collier County. The over development needs to stop. If we continue to That will not help. The biggest traffic The overpass might be better once a once a once a once a once a Year -Round neighbor, overdevelop that area, no toad improvements will help. Why not do an east- 12607293383 4/27/21 problem is going eastbound. Yes 1here. week week week imonth week Yes INo Resident etc.... west flyover fly over rather than north -south on Immokalee? Seasonal Resident (temporary At least At least residence at There should be an exit on Vanderbilt I don't Every once a once a Every least 1 month 12607291516 4/27/21 from 75 to avoid Immokalee know day Every day week week day Yes No per year) Social media There should be an exit to Vanderbilt from 75. Immokalee is really a nightmare. Respondent Question Question 5 Question Question Start Date Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 a. b. C. d. ID 4 6 7 Direct notification from HOA, At least At least friend, Every once a once a Every Year -Round neighbor, The noise level of traffic for those living along Immokalee Rd has become 12607226187 4/27/21 day Every day week 1week day Yes INo Resident etc.... unbearable Direct notification from HOA, At least At least At least At least At least friend, once a once a once a once a once a Year -Round neighbor, 12607202128 4/27/21 Yes Iweek week week 1week week No INo Resident etc.... At least At least At least At least once a once a once a once a Year -Round Email 12607184927 4/27/21 week week month week Yes No Resident notification At least At least Every once a once a Year -Round 12607096803 4/27/21 No day Every day Every day week week Yes No Resident Social media The traffic light at Valewood and Autumn Oaks is not working fairly as those of us trying to get out at the Autumn Oaks side have to wait 2 light cycles sometimes as Direct the traffic is too heavy coming out of Valewood and our green turn arrow isn't long notification enough for us to get across let alone trying to get out and across to the far lane in from HOA, order to get to the north west lane. Add that to the congestion at the intersection At least At least friend, that is being blocked by those traveling Immokalee Rd that didn't make it through I don't Every once a once a Every Year -Round neighbor, their light. It is slightly better since the season has slowed down but What will 12607013957 4/27/21 know day week Every day 1week day Yes INo Resident etc.... happen when when this traffic on Oaks Blvd gets any heavier? Thanks for listening. Help!!!!! You need to do something to help traffic congestion there. It's At least At least At least At least At least almost too once a once a once a once a once a Year -Round Email It's almost too late. Please extend Vanderbilt Beach Rd to east. Collier Blvd needs 12606988877 4/27/211 INo I I late!! 1week 1week imonth week week INo INo I Resident I notification Ito be wider. Immokalee Rd is hopeless Respondent Start Date Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question Question 5 Question Question Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 a. b. C. d. ID 4 6 7 NO NO NO... that is so dangerous. We have The overpass on GGP and Immokalee Rd too many has GGP going over. Your plan here has What I hate is that every Florida visitors and Livingston going over Immokalee. That on ramp interchange is different. old will not do anything to the traffic flow. You never know which side to get people.That The flow of an overpass needs to be on to get on the highway. Florida will cause At least Immokalee going OVER Livingston. needs to pick one style and make more Every once a Every Year -Round 12606840044 4/27/21 Immokalee is where the traffic is at.r Yes Ithem all the same. problems. day Every day Every day 1week day Yes INo Resident Social media The street lights also cause the traffic problems. I do not have a recommend ation for this. It's above my pay grade but I must say I don't want my area to look I would hope And entrance and anything exit could be put further east to I like Fort 75. That is where most of the Myers. That I live in Regent Park and I really don't traffic is coming from and I'm scares me want an overpass down the street from sure those residents would like more than My comment is to focus on the area east of 75. And to change the lights that they my house. Just the look of it reminds me the convenience of not having to all the At least At least At least put in between Walmart and target on Immokalee Road. That has caused delay of the cities of which I moved to Naples to come all the way down here to traffic in the Every once a once a once a Every Year -Round west of 75 since it was put in before the east was developed. But under no 12606755312 4/27/21 get away from 30 years ago. No Iget on 75 world day week week imonth day Yes INo Resident Social media circumstances do I want to resemble Fort Myers. No more lights. The ones on there are not maintaining If you're not relieving the traffic on a flow of Every Every Year -Round 12606755310 4/27/21 Immokalee then what's the point? iYes I Itraffic. Iday lEveryday lEveryday lEveryday Iday IYes iYes lResident ISocial media Respondent Question Question 5 Question Question Start Date Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 a. b. C. d. ID 4 6 7 Need more information. Impact on seed to table business and customer safety) as well as employee parking/transportation. Also impact on residents of Carlton Lakes residents. Also need information on noise Looks like a nightmare of level impacts for Willoughby residents confusion. The people driving and Carlton Lakes. We are in far NW Palm around down here have enough Collier is simply growing too fast now. New development needs to slow way down River and Livingston is already noticeable. issues making a common turn - and focus on housing industry that exists with a cap on number of new home Raised higher will definitely impact noise. hence that shocking number of developments built. It isn't just the roads that are impacted. Schools can't keep up. Last I think you should look at accident rollovers, head-ons, etc. This At least This learning is impacted. Naples is quickly losing its charm and cachet. I think we reports for GGP and A -PR intersection. looks way too challenging for the No Every once a Every Year -Round need to seriously decide who we want to be. Naples or the dense east coast of the 12606731846 4/27/21 I've seen some bad things there. No laverage Naples driver. comment. day Everyday lEveryday week day Yes INo Resident Social media state. At least Less than At least I don't once a once a once a Year -Round We need to stop the building of more communities. We will lose the beauty and 12606702640 4/27/21 Love this idea! know week Every day Every day month week No No Resident Social media charm of Naples if it continues. Please check with the feds regarding 175 we have heard that the plan is to widen the interstate through exit111 We live in The Strand now but are 42 year About time! The over pass works on GG parkway it should work for here also! If the residents of At least At least At least At least county wouldn't have approved of all the developments east of 951 we wouldn't Collier once a once a once a once a Every Year -Round have had this problem! Always "fixing" the cart and never taking care of the horse!! 12606696588 4/27/21 Yes Icounty. week week week imonth day Yes Yes lResident Social media Prior propper planning prevents piss poor performance! Seasonal Resident Less (temporary At least At least Atleast Less than than residence at once a once a once a once a once a least 1 month 12606686479 4/27/21 Good idea Yes week week week imonth month Yes INo per year) Social media At least At least once a once a Every Year -Round 12606680215 4/27/21 Yes month Every day Every day month day Yes No Resident Social media Respondent Question Question 5 Question Question Start Date Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 a. b. C. d. ID 4 6 7 1 live right off of Immokalee and Northbrook drive. We can't even hey out of our development between 4.30 and 6 o'clock due to the backup of the ramp on Every Every Year -Round 12606673233 4/27/21 75. No day Everyday Everyday Everyday day Yes No Resident Social media Stop the building east on imokolee until you fix this. At least At least At least Every once a once a once a Year -Round 12606602288 4/27/21 No day Every day week week week Yes No Resident Social media This is not a bad idea but I would prefer the diverging diamond interchange At least At least At least At least Sounds like a good idea. I'm in favor of I believe it helps the congestion as a better once a once a once a once a Every Year -Round Email This congestion problem continues on through route 41 and should also be part of a 12606501439 4/27/21 the recommendation. Yes in these areas. solution. week week 1week week day Yes INo Resident notification proposed solution. Once again, will be too confusing forthe challenged senior drivers. You want to see Not an ideal solution as this is just a band if this will aid approach to resolving the issue of work at this there not being enough roads to bring location? individuals in Eastern collier county to the Put a few beach or other Naples attractions. Also, 70-85 year overdevelopment of areas close to the olds in cars beach is contributing to these issues. at night and Until the county is able to resolve the root have them issue, continuing overdevelopment where Not same demographic in Naples. naviage a the infrastructure cannot support the You have multiple senior drivers mock-up of At least At least Atleast Less than Atleast growth, the problem is not going to be and this is going to be very this once a once a once a once a once a Year -Round Email Yes, the root cause of the issue, continuing overdevelopment, will need to be 12606417534 4/27/21 resolved. No Idifficult for them to navigate. proposal. week week week imonth month Yes IYes Resident notification addressed before the issue can be resolved. At least At least Collier Every once a once a Year -Round County Not sure what the answer is to the traffic situation on Immokalee. I like all the 12606417077 4/27/21 day Every day month Every day week Yes No Resident website proposals, just need to get started. At least At least Atleast Atleast Atleast Wow. This really changes the once a once a once a once a once a Year -Round I'm glad there is a study going on but I think one of the solutions is to go to the 12606414708 4/27/21 No character of North Naples. week week week month week No No Resident Social media source of the problem which is uncontrolled development east of 75. Respondent Question Question 5 Question Question Start. Date Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 a. b. C. d. ID 4 6 7 If I am traveling west on Immokalee Road Less and try to turn in residence at Regent than Less than Less than Less than At least Park I can never get in during rush hour. once a once a once a once a once a Year -Round Email 12606358365 4/26/21 And NO ONE will stop to let you thru No month month month month week No No Resident notification Immokolee Road is a disaster in season Direct notification from HOA, friend, Every Every Year -Round neighbor, 12606354448 4/26/21 No Iday Every day Everyday lEveryday day Yes INo Resident etc.... Seasonal Direct Resident notification (temporary from HOA, At least Less than residence at friend, Every once a once a Every least 1 month neighbor, 12606264590 4/26/211 Yes Quite confusing day Every day week month day Yes No I per year) etc.... Have been thru the one at Daniels, that one At least also works Every once a Every Year -Round 12606228526 4/26/21 All for it, Golden Gate works awesome! No Iwell. day Every day Every day 1week day Yes Yes Resident Social media Go for it !!! Direct notification from HOA, At least At least At least friend, Every once a once a once a Year -Round neighbor, 12606194775 4/26/21 Not needed No Iday Every day imonth week week Yes IYes Resident etc.... I think it is terrible how we are just packing people in here for a profit. SWFL (like many places) have beautiful nature and wildlife. I moved from Orlando to Naples because the same thing was happening there and now Miami is the same way. The building has to stop at some point. There aren't even enough well paying jobs here. At least At least Traffic is a nightmare and here are too many people as it is. I know that innovation I don't Every once a once a Every Year -Round is the wave of the future but, it would be nice tp preserve some areas instead of 12606156705 4/26/21 know day Every day week imonth day Yes IYes Resident Social media building on every patch of grass. Less At least Less than At least Less than than once a once a once a once a once a Year -Round 12606152279 4/26/21 Excellent proposed solution. Yes month month month month month No No Resident Social media Direct notification Less from HOA, than At least At least Less than At least friend, once a once a once a once a once a Year -Round neighbor, 12606147970 4/26/211 INo I I Imonth imonth 1week imonth imonth JNo INo I Resident etc.... Respondent Question Question 5 Question Question Start Date Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 a. b. C. d. ID 4 6 7 It looks quite confusing to me the way the lanes seem to go on to the other side of the road under 75. With all the older people who vacation here they already At least At least At least At least At least drive on the wrong side of the once a once a once a once a once a Year -Round Please, please take into consideration the comments made by the driver's actually 12606119152 4/26/211 No road, this seems very confusing. month 1week month month imonth No INo Resident Social media using these intersections. Thank you! At least At least At least At least At least once a once a once a once a once a Year -Round 12606111466 4/26/21 No week week week week week Yes No Resident Social media Get it done! Direct notification Dislike overpass so close to single family from HOA, housing. Gives a Metro feel to the area. At least At least friend, Maybe local commissioners should stop Every once a once a Year -Round neighbor, Find another avenue to relieve traffic congestion, stemming from unabated 12606057883 4/26/211 amending long term zoning plans. Yes day lEveryday Everyday month 1week Yes No lResident etc.... development in East Collier County. Direct notification from HOA, At least At least At least At least friend, once a once a once a once a Year -Round neighbor, 12606049557 4/26/21 Yes Iweek week month Iweek Yes INo Resident etc.... Every Every Year -Round 12605980671 4/26/21 day Every day Every day Every day day Yes Yes Resident Social media At least At least Less than At least I don't once a once a once a once a Every Year -Round 12605949247 4/26/21 know week week month week day No No Resident Social media Living in Delasol, anything to help with a At least At least At least At least left turn onto Livingston would help. It is once a once a once a once a Year -Round 12605846140 4/26/21 very scary right now No week Every day week month week Yes No Resident Social media No .... just do something to alleviate the traffic..lt can be so bad I like the overpass as I live off of Livingston about A mile north of immokalee. Will this help to relieve the traffic on Immokalee? As that is the real issue coming East or west especially if there is an accident on75. The people who bail and come to Livingston to go north make the congestion awful between veterans and bonita beach road It looks awesome and should Direct heading north on Livingston. Then coming keep that traffic Flowing well. notification east on immokalee is rough too because it Will it be too difficult for the from HOA, gets backed up so badly from 75 elderly seasonal drivers to follow At least At least friend, intersection. The traffic on Livingston or will the signs and pattern of Every once a once a Year -Round neighbor, 12605785787 4/26/211 usually flows pretty well. INo Ithe road be easy? I Jday lEveryday lEveryday Imonth 1week IYes INo I Resident etc.... Respondent Question Question 5 Question Question Start Date Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 a. b. C. d. ID 4 6 7 Every Every Year -Round 12605750291 4/26/21 Yes day Every day Every day Every day day Yes Yes Resident Social media Direct notification from HOA, friend, I don't Every Every Year -Round neighbor, 12605728943 4/26/21 know day Every day Every day Every day day Yes INo Resident etc.... At least At least Construction will be horrible but the I don't once a once a Every Year -Round 12605692664 4/26/21 outcome favorable know month Every day Everyday month day Yes No Resident Social media At least Every once a Year -Round 12605682499 4/26/21 Yes day Every day Every day week Yes Yes Resident Social media Direct notification from HOA, friend, Every Every Year -Round neighbor, 12605672376 4/26/21 No Iday Every day Everyday lEveryday day Yes IYes Resident etc.... Direct notification from HOA, At least At least friend, Every once a once a Every Year -Round neighbor, 12605644963 4/26/21 Yes Iday Every day week 1week day No INo Resident etc.... You are trying to improve traffic flow but you cannot succeed at that by adding I live in the Strand, right in the middle of this mess on Immokalee Rd. During rush more hour,7-9 am and 3-6pm we are essentially blocked in our community or must add There is simply too much traffic at this developmen an extra hour to go any place. Immokalee and Livingston are our two exits and it's intersection. How does this relieve traffic t and more At least At least At least difficult to leave during those hours mentioned above. I feel commissioners are not on Immokalee Rd.? It doesn't do a thing. cars. Stop once a once a once a Every Year -Round doing their duty representing the citizens of Collier County allowing such a mess 12605633244 4/26/21 Stop developing now! No developing. week Every day month imonth day Yes INo Resident Social media and danger to occur in this area. At least At least At least Every once a once a once a Year -Round 12605621707 4/26/21 day Every day week week week Yes No Resident Social media Respondent Start Date Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question Question 5 Question Question Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 a. b. C. d. ID 4 6 7 It seems an overpass at Livingston and Immokalee Rd will only aggravate the traffic jam at Livingston and Bonita Beach Rd. That problem can't possibly be fed more Every Every Year -Round cars even faster. Why aren't overpasses being proposed on Immokalee Rd to 12605597277 4/26/21 Yes day Every day Every day Every day day Yes No Resident Social media move traffics faster East to west? An overpass on Livingston isn't going to help the congestion heading west and east on Immokalee road. Why not open some on ramps only and Vanderbilt and I- At least 75? This would help the congestion Every once a Every Year -Round 12605594122 4/26/21 getting on 75. No day Every day Every day week day Yes Yes Resident Social media Direct notification from HOA, At least At least At least At least At least friend, Would be much improved with this once a once a once a once a once a Year -Round neighbor, 12605544997 4/26/21 change! Yes week week week imonth week Yes INo Resident etc.... Improvements are sorely needed! Much needed improvement in At least This improvement would be great and this area. Traffic is congested in Every once a Every Year -Round 12605537993 4/26/21 help keep traffic flowing. No this area. day Every day Every day week day Yes Yes Resident Social media Infrastructure improvements are needed to keep up with growth and development. It is almost impossible to make any left turns if it is not at a stoplight. Waiting 10 Every Every Year -Round minutes just to turn into your neighborhood is ridiculous! The tall landscaping 12605521903 4/26/21 Yes day Every day Every day Every day day Yes No Resident Social media doesn't help either! Sounds good, though, if the timing of the At least At least At least At least At least stop lights were in better sync you could once a once a once a once a once a Year -Round 12605502672 4/26/21 most likely avoid this problem. Yes month week week month week Yes No Resident Social media At least At least At least Less than At least I don't once a once a once a once a once a Year -Round Email 12605489308 4/26/21 know week week month month month No No Resident notification Do it. Yes it is a great proposal We do not want to become like ft and one Meyers. It is so congested there which I going any direction. We are thought was At least Collier starting to lookjust like that. This happening Every once a Every Year -Round County 12605410993 4/26/21 Do it please!! The sooner the better. Yes recommendation is excellent! long ago. day Every day week Every day day Yes IYes Resident website Please do something soon!!!! At least Every once a Every Year -Round I believe that the changes in the area would be helpful. The immokklee and 12605390573 4/26/21 Yes day Every day Every day month day Yes Yes Resident Social media Livingston area are backed up every day. They need a light in and out of seed to table Or at the back entrance to carton The lanes going head on would lakes ! All the cars from seed to table Just never work her, our Population Left turn At least Collier Seed to table has really put a strain on the area quickly and from 10 am -8 PM. whiz by to try and U turn to get onto is too senior in age„they are too ONLY lasigyt once a Every Year -Round County They are building tons of apts on Livingston and east Immokalee road s00000 12605312057 4/26/21 Immokalee road . It's a death trap ! Yes confused normally needed week Every day Every day Every day day Yes Yes Resident website many housing developments it needs to happen soon! At least I don't Every once a Every Year -Round 12605295079 4/26/21 know day Every day week day Yes Yes Resident Social media Respondent Question Question 5 Question Question Start Date Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 a. b. C. d. ID 4 6 7 Direct notification from HOA, Immokalee Rd is the congested road not Less than At least friend, This has been an ongoing problem for years and I'm happy to see that it is finally Livingston Rd. How will this help ease the Every once a once a Year -Round neighbor, being addressed. The Livingston corridor needs to be corrected to improve the flow 12605291902 4/26/21 congestion on Immokalee Rd? Yes lGood idea day Every day Every day imonth week Yes INo Resident etc.... of traffic on Immokalee Rd not Livingston Rd. Direct notification Less from HOA, than At least At least Less than At least friend, once a once a once a once a once a Year -Round neighbor, 12605288269 4/26/21 No Imonth week month imonth week No INo Resident etc.... People unfamiliar with the travel Direct lanes will take time trying to notification understand where they are. This Less from HOA, was a big issue in At least At least than friend, Should the overpass be 6 lanes, like Sarasota/Bradenton at University once a once a once a Year -Round neighbor, 12605285538 4/26/21 Livingston at that location? Yes jAve. month Every day Every day imonth month No INo Resident etc.... At least Every once a Every Year -Round 12605271977 4/26/21 This is much needed !!!! Yes day Every day Every day week day Yes No Resident Social media You also should look at putting a 1-75 /Vanderbilt Road access H Can be confusing, but then, At least At least At least At least some folks still don't understand once a once a once a once a Year -Round 12605265676 4/26/21 Works well at Airport & Golden Gate Yes traffic circles..... week Every day week month month Yes No Resident Social media Overall the County does a good job keeping up with congestion management. Do not permit any additional development until this issue can be resolved! You are destroying the lifestyle of your perminent residents. Speed up the process of implementing a new Everglades Blvd exit for 175 and expedite the Vanderbilt Beach Road Extension. It sounds great to expedite a way to get traffic on and off of 175 At least from Immokalee Road but what backs the on ramp now is that traffic is so bad Every once a Every Year -Round Email heading north it backs up the merge and on ramp. Also more traffic enforcement 12605252685 4/26/21 day Every day month Every day day Yes IYes Resident notification for cars blocking intersections at the traffic lights! Seasonal Resident (temporary At least At least At least At least At least residence at once a once a once a once a once a least 1 month 12605218651 4/26/21 Sounds like major improvement. INo I No comment I Helpful 1week 1week 1week Imonth Imonth INo INo I per year) ISocial media Respondent Start Date Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question Question 5 Question Question Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 a. b. C. d. ID 4 6 7 Left turn to goNon Logan will cross Immokalee further to the W? Aside from confusing people, how much will This makes my head spin. I don't this understand it. Why move EB configuratio Direct traffic to the WB lanes only to n improve notification move them back again? Same for things? And from HOA, It's really silly to ask people their opinions of these options without giving them any This makes sense to me, but do we really moving WB traffic to EB lanes what if you friend, numbers of cost, construction time, and how many more cars can be moved per need 3 left turn lanes from SIB Livingston and back, all within a matter of a miss your Every Every Year -Round neighbor, hour with the improvements. How can we weigh whether or not we find it 12604313655 4/26/21 onto Immokalee Rd EB? No few hundred feet. turn? day Every day Every day Every day Jday No IYes Resident etc.... worthwhile without knowing these things? The overpass should be on Immokalee Road, not Livingston as proposed if you At least At least are going to continue to allow the present Every once a once a Every Year -Round Email 12604228890 4/26/21 development. Yes day Every day week week day Yes No Resident notification Seasonal Resident Less (temporary than Less than residence at once a once a least 1 month 1260404223614/26/21 Yes Imonth month IYes INo per year) Social media Every Every Year -Round Email 12603996088 4/26/21 Carpool!!!!!!! No day Every day Every day Every day day No No Resident notification Nightmare!!!! Naples is not Naples anymore. oo Q Ratherthan looking at increasing the road traffic, consider whether the developmen t causing the traffic is part of a Seasonal Very confusing if you are not Master Resident used to the configuration. Also Plan. Don't (temporary cars speed up through them put the At least At least At least Less than At least residence at Not all development is good for the County. The Growth management Plan making it more difficult for cars "cart before once a once a once a once a once a least 1 month Email determines the correct growth of the County. Commissioners are constantly 12603967572 4/26/211 IYes I not used to the interchange. Ithe horse". 1week I month I month I month I month INo INo I per year) Inotification loverricling this Plan resulting in poorly planned mitigation methods. Respondent Question Question 5 Question Question Start Date Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 a. b. C. d. ID 4 6 7 At least Less than At least Collier Traffic backs up. It takes at least Every once a once a once a Year -Round County 12603964089 4/26/21 Opposed Yes half an hour to get through day Every day month month week Yes No Resident website A light on immokalee at Oakes Farm just before the Livingston light Less Less than Atleast Atleast Less than than once a once a once a once a once a Email 12603946317 4/26/21 No No No No month month month month month No No notification No, other than there is already WAY too much traffic on Immokalee Rd! up in arms over noise control and depreciating property values if I lived in the affected residential neighborhoo ds. Irresponsible comprehensi ve planning on the part of Collier Commission e rs approving all these new Eastern developmen ts. How can these new village approvals be called doesn't look very user friendly or fiscally At least At least This study should have been conducted years ago before Commissioner moved If I lived in one of those residential straight forward ... appears neutral Every once a once a Every Year -Round Email forward approving 3 rural villages that alone will add 20,000+car trips per day. 12602716718 4/25/21 communities I'd be up in arms! No 1complicated with long signal lights when the day Every day week 1week day Yes INo Resident notification Irresponsible comprehensive planning at the people's expense. Just don't add stoplights. At least At least Sounds good but do not add Eliminate Every once a once a Year -Round 12602652505 4/25/21 No Yes stoplights them. day Every day month Every day week Yes No Resident Social media Collier Every Every Year -Round County 12602596921 4/25/21 No day Every day Every day Every day day Yes No Resident website Big Cypress being developed expects 8,300 families, then there will be: 3 other At least Collier villages with additional traffic. Whatever is best for the citizens who are already once a Every Year -Round County living in this area, who never expected this growth in the first place, is the best 12602457231 4/24/21 Every day month Every day day No No Resident website thing in serving future traffic problems. Respondent Question Question 5 Question Question Start. Date Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 a. b. C. d. ID 4 6 7 Interesting. As a rule do not like adding lights, but appears the three lights Tried the one in Sarasota once. are synced. The concept is excellent. Have not The proposal looks good in expediting Although one time is insufficient, been at north/south travel on Livingston Road, if Sarasota would do it again, that Daniels and At least At least At least At least At least Heard from Gulfshore Business Daily. The Sarasota interchange gained by access to Seed and Table appears similar I don't recommendation is sound. SR82. Will once a once a once a once a once a Year -Round Email attention. Good to see Lee county implementing. How many added vehicles (% 12601957575 4/24/21 as exists now. Support know Isupport. check it out. week week 1week week week Yes IYes Resident notification increase) per hour does Sarasota report with the new interchange? Direct notification from HOA, friend, Every Every Year -Round neighbor, 12601231580 4/24/21 1day Every day Everyday lEveryday day Yes IYes Resident etc.... Less At least At least At least At least than Try to avoid Immokalee Rd and use once a once a once a once a once a Year -Round Too much residential and commercial building with no regard to traffic and 12599849606 4/23/21 Vanderbilt beach rd Yes week week week week month No No Resident Social media roadways! Direct notification from HOA, At least At least At least At least At least friend, I don't once a once a once a once a once a Year -Round neighbor, I don't have the answers but something definitely needs to be done. Normal 10 12599730649 4/23/21 know week week month 1week week No INo Resident etc.... minute trips now take 30+. At least At least Collier once a once a Every Year -Round County You need to look at a Michigan left turns. Novi, Michigan I think it is 15. Keeps 12599533874 4/23/21 Every day week month day Yes Resident website traffic moving beautifully. Direct notification How much from HOA, traffic will At least At least At least At least friend, this bring to once a once a once a once a Year -Round neighbor, 12599421760 4/23/21 IYes I I Logan Blvd. 1week 1week 1week lEveryday 1week IYes INo I Resident etc.... Question Question 5 Question Question Question 4 Start Date Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 a.would b. C. d. 4 6 need to a simulation of the flow of traffice The congestion is mostly on Immokalee for this. and really bad. Live it everyday at that hard to At least intersection. What about an overpass on picture how Every once a Year -Round Email 12599323825 4/23/21 Immokalee over Livingston. Yes may work. this works. day Every day Everyday lEveryday week Yes INo Resident notification Please figure it out sooner than later and get construction going!! Stop permitting new developmen is east of Collier.lt is causing too At least much Every once a Year -Round We desperately need a light at Randall and 8th since opening up 8th.lt is dangerous 12599117913 4/23/21 congestion. day Every day I Every day week No IYes Resident Social media and practically impossible to navigate. Collier Please consider adding an exit off 175 at Vanderbilt Beach Road. I believe that would Every Every Year -Round County alleviate much of the traffic using the interchange on Immokalee Road from the 12598648009 4/23/21 No day Every day Every day Every day day No Yes Resident website south. Direct notification from HOA, friend, Every Every Year -Round neighbor, 12598493855 4/23/21 1 support this proposal. Yes I support this proposal. day Everyday lEveryday Every day day No INo Resident etc.... Yes, good Yes, the DDI is the most effective solution and efficient traffic control that should solution for the Immokalee/75 be At least Less than At least Intersection and lengthening all implemente Every once a once a once a Year -Round 12598258120 4/23/21 Yes turns lanes. d asap. day Every day week month month No No Resident Social media No. At least At least At least At least once a once a once a once a Year -Round 12598230446 4/23/21 Yes week week Every day week week Yes No Resident Social media Just wait for At least At least Collier This is the worst intersection. Get overpass Every once a once a Year -Round County 12597799001 4/23/21 Do it now. No this done right away. solution. day Every day Every day week week Yes Yes Resident website How do we know when the project will get started, At least At least Going left from Valewood to Immokalee Rd toward high school is bad. Long lights Good plan, congestion is bad. once a once a Every Year -Round Email and drivers seem confused as to whether they can go left, often traffic is coming at 12597393725 4/22/21 Yes Thanks- week Every day week day Yes No Resident notification you from the other side of the intersection. Respondent Question Question 5 Question Question Start Date Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 a. b. C. d. ID 4 6 7 There needs to be a bypass in Golden Gate Estates, perhaps one near the toll road and one in the middle of The Estate area! This idea was put on the board years ago and got pushed under the rug so to speak. If SOMEONE WOULD PLEASE PICK UP THIS ALTERNATIVE AND GET IT DONE! THIS IS YEARS BEYOND NEEDING TO BE DONE AFTER BEING A RESIDENT OF OUR BEAUTIFUL NAPLES SINCE 1980, we prided ourselves in keeping continuity. Please read my message RE we Desperately need two bypasses, one east of the 1-75 Please do take my plea seriously, If you toll and mostly one ON THE MIDDLE OF GOLDEN GATE ESTATES!! THIS WOULD would still like my input, I am available to ELEVATE THE TRAFFIC ON IMMOKALLEE RD, PINE RIDGE, VANDERBILT, ETC ... be reached at the following info. PLEASE READ THIS COMMENT TO THE BOARD WITH SERIOUS CONSIDERATION. I LADONNA W URI 12966 White Violet At least At least At least At least WILL BE HAPPY TO HELP IF YOU WISH TO CONTACT ME. BELOW IS MY INFO. Drive Quail Creek Estates Naples, Florida once a once a once a once a Every Year -Round Email LADONNA URI 12966 WHITE VIOLET DRIVE QUAIL CREEK ESTATES NAPLES, FL Zip 12597199538 4/22/21 34119 Telephone: (239) 289-6464 No week 1week week week Jday Yes Yes I Resident notification 34119 Cell (249) 289-6464 Traffic lights on both streets are over the top is one reason but how else would one enter some of the traffic light areas if there wasn't a light? You go a block after one red light hit another one not Ride through both roadways At least At least At least At least Don't have clue how going to change congestion on both roadways in naples to productive at all in solving traffic weekly Immoklee by far the once a once a once a once a Year -Round many needed turns going across traffic. No ones going to stop let you go this is 2021 12597034786 4/22/21 congestion on either roadway. Yes 1worse one. week week imonth week Yes IYes Resident Social media it's all about them We need another access to 75 at Vanderbilt beach road full interchange At least Collier that would keep alot of traffic off Every once a Every Year -Round County 12596879573 4/22/21 Immokalee.. No day Every day Every day week day Yes No Resident website I live off Logan and would rather see less traffic on the road. I wonder if this displaced left turn would make Logan more attractive to I would say it is confusing at first, use and Less however I am assuming over time thus At least than Excellent idea. The overpass at Airport people get used to it and it works increase Every once a once a Year -Round 12596796586 4/22/211 Pulling works great. IYes I better at keeping traffic flowing. Itraffic. Jday lEveryday 1week I Every day Imonth IYes IYes lResident ISocial media 11 am glad that the county is studying the corridor. Respondent Start Date Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question Question 5 Question Question Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 a. b. C. d. ID 4 6 7 At least Every once a Every Year -Round Open Everglades blvd to interstate 75 and also Desoto. This will definitely help 12596415162 4/22/21 day week Every day Every day day Yes No Resident Immokalee road. At least open Everglades blvd An answer to all the questions. Simply stop building/sandwiching new houses and new condos. The more you build, the more roads you'll need. Eventually you will have a Miami or Ft Lauderdale. That's Thank you for asking the residents these questions. I truly hope you see our town not was Naples was designed to be. This is has developed too many houses/condos too quickly, and that has put us in this 12596187437 4/22/21 the simple answer. situation. At least At least At least At least The Collier commissioners are all about the big money, NOT citizens. They ruined the congestion is caused by over building/ once a once a once a once a Every Year -Round the Oakes Estates community by bowing down for the payout and allowing the 12596116680 4/22/21 over population. No week week week week day Yes No Resident adult center. FAILURE !!!! They take BIG contributions & then do favors Keeps traffic moving but a lot of At least At least At least At least Great idea really helps keep traffic moving people unfamiliar on how to once a once a once a once a Year -Round 12595843424 4/22/21 not a lot of accidents Yes drive through it month Every day week month week No No Resident Social media Any way to widen road to one more lane on each side all down immokalee I don't understand the thought process here? Naples is going to turn into a nightmare sooner than later! You think the congestion is bad now lol. There are at least two new communities being built on immokalee road and there's a community that was just approved on oil well road with approximately 8'500 homes and they are expanding Ave Maria everyday! All these people in all these communities that will all be traveling via immokalee road in the very near future... If you've noticed things have already drastically changed in the last 5 years.. I remember when you used to be able to live here and you never hear a horn beep. Now that's all you hear. Road rage is escalating and so are accidents. Pretty soon it's not going to be much more different than the city you left to come to Paradise! Everyday in my travels now I see the demolition of wildlife habitats to create more housing for the retired and wealthy. I haven't seen any animals in my backyard for 3 years now but I am seeing more deceased on the roadway than ever before. Just think about it, that one community that is going to be built on oil well road with 8,500 homes each home containing at least two people with the possibility of $17,000 more vehicles on the roadways. And that's just one road in naples they are Every Every Year -Round building everywhere. Cash is King here and it comes before everything! God please 1259578467214/22/21 Yes Iday Everyday Everyday lEveryday day No IYes Resident Social media help us because we know not what we do! Immokalee is the worst road in the county. I live off Collier and work near Every Every Year -Round goodlette. I take immokalee every single day and it takes over 30 minutes or more 12595330043 4/22/21 Great idea. Yes Looks great day Every day Every day Every day day No No Resident Social media due to lights and lots of congestion. We need a change. Out East on Immokalee Rd. Do not put so many homes in all the areas as the Good. Please in this area do not cram the infrastructure will not hold the traffic even if you make all the traffic homes in. The County has created to At least At least At least At least At least recommendations. Think it through Commissioners. It will choke out Naples. In many homes in small areas due to letting once a once a once a once a once a None of the the future even more people will be coming here from up North because of their 12595231218 4/22/21 developers have more homes. Yes week week week week week No No above Social media policys. Respondent Question Question 5 Question Question Start Date Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 a. b. C. d. ID 4 6 7 Direct notification from HOA, friend, Every Every Year -Round neighbor, 12595224948 4/22/21 No Iday Every day Everyday lEveryday day Yes IYes Resident etc.... It is just so frustrating that Bill McDaniels is in the Collier family pockets and growth will continue because he doesn't have to drive it everyday and will always approve Really unsure, have not used to Every Every Year -Round any development. That being said a fly over going East-West at Immokalee and 12594974877 4/22/21 Yes please! No have an opinion. No comment No comment day Every day Every day Every day day Yes No Resident Social media Collier would be well received also. The same problem exists at Immokalee At least At least At least Collier and Collier Blvd. I would suggest Every once a once a once a Year -Round County Please consider Rte 951 (Collier Blvd) in he study. There are more homes being 12594839332 4/22/21 continuing the project past 951 Yes day week week Every day week Yes No Resident website built in this area and the congestion is terrible. I disagree placing an overpass at this location. It is understandable that there will be increased traffic, but creating Again, faster routes only fuels larger Again, the quicker we move moving developments at the rural fringe, people through an intersection, people eventually increasing traffic And the greater the distance people quickly is At least At least At least congestion further. This cycle will not will commute. It's a never ending not the Every once a once a once a Year -Round I heard about this survey via the news outlet on 04.2121, it's a shame that the 12594765945 4/22/21 end. Yes 1problem. answer. day Every day week imonth month Yes IYes Resident County did not notify residents that will be affected by this directly. Protect residents in Carlton Lakes since At least At least At least Whatever the county decides please act fast. Also, part of the problem are the Seed to Table has added congestion to Anhything to increase the flow is Every once a once a once a Year -Round seasonal residents. Can anything be done with that? Since these additions are not 12585003370 4/18/21 their neighborhood entrance and exit. Yes helpful. day Every day week week week Yes No Resident Social media needed off season. At least At least At least Every once a once a once a Year -Round 12583445235 4/17/21 No day week week Every day week Yes No Resident Social media As a 8 year resident of Carlton Lakes, the Direct increase in east bound traffic on notification Immokalee Rd., is more prevalent.... and from HOA, I believe that not having an 1-75 On & Off ramp at Vanderbilt Rd. has caused an my greatest concern with the overpass is At least At least At least At least At least friend, massive influx of traffic both on Immokalee and Pine Ridge 1-75 exits. I believe a Greater Noise Pollution for Carlton Lakes once a once a once a once a once a Year -Round neighbor, study of an interchange or exit on Vanderbilt Rd. should be taken into consideration 12582137398 4/17/21 and other residents! Yes week week week 1week week Yes INo Resident etc.... first. These can be a nightmare until you have gone through one repeatedly. So many lanes and Direct choices. Our Naples residents and Looks like notification visitors have an older another Less from HOA, demographic and have difficulty very, very than At least At least Less than At least friend, Over passes, although expensive seem to in one lane rotaries never mind confusing once a once a once a once a once a Year -Round neighbor, This area is highly congested, I just wonder if there are solutions that require less 12581826649 4/16/21 work well. Example is airport pulling road. Yes this! solution. month month month month month No No Resident etc.... cognitive strain. Respondent Start Date Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question Question 5 Question Question Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 a. b. C. d. ID 4 6 7 1amnot in that area often enough to I live (own) in Carlton Lakes, and I am know if this against this proposal! I use this would be intersection multiple times a day, and do I use the 75 interchange a few beneficial At least At least This survey needs to go directly to every resident living in this particular area! NOT want an overpass to be constructed I don't times per week and I find no for that Every once a once a Every Year -Round Email Having it tucked on page 6, 7, or 8 in a newsletter is inappropriate!! Livingston Rd 12581623784 4/16/21 here. It is unnecessary! know issue warranting a drastic change! intersection. day Every day week Imonth day Yes IYes Resident notification does not need an overpass!!! As a resident of Carlton Lakes, I am opposed to this proposed recommendation. I don't see this as a solution to the traffic on Immokalee Rd. and the the congestion from residents out East heading into town or traffic flowing from 1-75. And you want to change our South gate entrance! This will make it more dangerous to get out of our subdivision and lower our property values. We will also bear the brunt of Seed to Table traffic into our community. That store has already brought chaos to our community! Put a traffic light at our North gate. Much cheaper! This is devastating to many of our residents at Carlton Lakes. Come to our board Please talk to the residents before any decisions are made. I'm so close to leaving meeting and LISTEN to us!! WE PAY At least At least At least At least Naples for good because it is too built up. Our beaches are being destroyed and our TAXES TOO, NOT JUST THE BIG No, but I heard this has helped in once a once a once a once a Year -Round Email wildlife are being forced into residential neighborhoods because we are building on 12580918664 4/16/21 BUSINESSES AND BUILDERS!! No Isarasota. No. week Every day month 1week week Yes INo Resident notification every inch of Collier County. It is not the town I moved to over 20 years ago! Every Every Year -Round 12580586583 4/16/21 No day Every day Every day day Yes No Resident I am glad this study has been done and there is hope for less traffic. Thanks I am not familiar with this term or type of intersection. I do not It is a busy intersection and this would I have driven this type of find this improve traffic flow. What type of noise interchange up north. I am not intersection mitigation would be offered to the people sure how well it would work in a to be too At least At least At least At least At least living nearby on the south side of community with many seniors busy right once a once a once a once a once a Year -Round With so much development planned east of CR951, I'm curious about new roads in 12579720059 4/16/21 Immokalee? IYes I and many tourists. inow. 1week 1week imonth 1week imonth IYes IYes lResident ISocial media Ithat area that might impact the study area. Respondent Start Date Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question Question 5 Question Question Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 a. b. C. d. ID 4 6 7 Seasonal Resident (temporary At least At least residence at Every once a once a Every least 1 month 12578416890 4/15/21 Yes I Not at this time day Every day week 1week day Yes INo per year) Social media The majority of the traffic is coming on Immoklee and as more development occurs The traffic on Livingston is not the Seasonal to the East and fewer amenities open excessive traffic will continue. These problem; it is the traffic flow on Resident residents will drive down Immokolee to go to Trader Joe's, Mercato and other Immokolee causes the traffic back up. I A diamond interchange will not (temporary locations to the west. A better solution is elevated express lanes that will connect do too see how this overpass is going to solve the problem. A cloverleaf At least At least At least residence at directly to a 1-75 cloverleaf and will move traffic from before Livingston and past resolve the issue and reduce the amount interchange is needed to keep Every once a once a once a least 1 month Email Logan. It would be helpful if additional 1-75 freeway on/off ramps were added at 12575354529 4/14/21 of traffic on Immokolee. No Itraffic flowing. No day Every day 1week month week Yes INo per year) notification Veteran's Parkway and Vanderbilt. Poor planning has created the very"problems" you are trying to solve. No matter when travel patterns or numbers have been assessed and documented, the data is never accurate because of continuous and rampant overdevelopment along both the Livingston Rd.and Immokalee Rd.corridors. Every, once green parcel of land is currently cleared and under construction... with no end is sight. Naples which touts itself as paradise is no longer one. Aside from the physical movement of automobiles and trucks , there appears to be no concern for the excessive toxic At least At least At least emissions from these very same vehicles. I once a once a once a Every Year -Round Email 12575055473 4/14/21 live here. It matters ! IYes I I 1week lEveryday Imonth 1week Jday IYes No lResident Inotification Please read question #1 Respondent Question Question 5 Question Question Start Date Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 a. b. C. d. ID 4 6 7 sense as I live in Carlton Lakes and see the increased traffic. I have two concerns: 1) the movement of the access management alternative(south end of Carlton Lakes Blvd). With traffic going north off of the SPUI, speed will be greatly increased making it more difficult to turn left into Carlton Lakes Blvd from the south lanes. Currently during season and with the normal increased traffic, we rely on the red light at the Livingston/Immokalee intersection to give us a break in the traffic flow to make the right turn out of our Carlton Lakes Blvd. The SPUI should help in this endeavor. There will be less traffic in that lane. However, this change will make it very difficult for the Seed to Table delivery trucks (18 wheelers) to negotiate the suggested curve in the access alternative. Would like to see the current left turn lane from the southbound lanes eliminated. Southbound could exit Livingston, go under bridge and left again into SingleNB Thru Lane. 2) Concerns about being able to exit from the north gate of Carlton Lakes Blvd onto Livingston. This is a dangerous intersection currently. The speed of the southbound lanes will be At least At least higher as frequent travelers on Livingston Every once a once a Every Year -Round 12574226880 4/14/21 will know the intersection has been No day Every day week 1week day Yes INo Resident At least At least At least At least At least once a once a once a once a once a Year -Round 12572761233 4/14/21 No week month week week week Yes No Resident Social media Is there room for 3rd turn lane coming off 75 to make left turn either east or westbound? I was going to recommend the DDI as I At least have driven the one in Sarasota Every once a Year -Round Is Veteran's Memorial Pkwy going to connect Logan to US 41 in the future? I think 12569538184 4/13/21 Yes Imany times and it is efficient. day Every day Every day Every day week No INo Resident this would add another option At least At least At least At least At least once a once a once a once a once a Year -Round Please consider more roundabouts on some of the other roads starting to get 12569027356 4/13/21 No week week week week month No No Resident Social media higher traffic (Randall, etc). The same nightmare exists at airport and Pine Ridge. A new exchange at Vanderbilt At least At least At least At least At least Collier County Transportation Department is way behind the proverbial eight ball in and 1-75 will additionally reduce traffic at I don't once a once a once a once a once a Year -Round Email so many areas. We are destined for the same F grade Lee County gets everytime 12568670352 4/12/21 Immokalee. know week week week week week No No Resident notification the fed does an analysis addressing transportation infrastructure. Respondent Question Question 5 Question Question Start Date Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 a. b. C. d. ID 4 6 7 I'm not sure I understand how this one works. A video showing how traffic flows through an intersection like this would At least At least At least At least At least probably be once a once a once a once a once a Year -Round I try to avoid Immokalee Rd as much as possible due to how bad the whole road is. 12568535636 4/12/21 Great idea. No 11 think it will help a little bit. better. week week week 1week week No No Resident Social media It would be nice if I could use it again without dreading it. Noticed it is confusing for Less This is great at golden gate and airport snowbirds and alot of people At least At least than Collier pulling. You should do this here and at 41 almost go to the right into once a once a once a Year -Round County 12568216586 4/12/21 and 951 in south naples. Yes incoming traffic. Yes do it! week Every day Every day week month No No Resident website At least At least At least At least At least I don't once a once a once a once a once a Year -Round 12568136712 4/12/21 know week week week week week No No Resident Social media Direct Considerjoining new right turn lanes from Noterhbrooke Dr onto Immokalee Rd notification with the expanded turn lanes for 175 to 1- allow more time for vehicles continuing from HOA, west on Immokalee Rd to safely merge onto Immokalee vs. forcing them to At least friend, immediately turn into the main flow of Immokalee Rd. 2- allow drivers entering 175 Excellent Every once a Every Year -Round neighbor, to not have to merge with the main flow of Immokalee Rd for a approx 500 ft. 12568117832 4/12/211 Excellent proposal IYes I Excellent proposal 1proposal Jday 1week lEveryday lEveryday Jday IYes INo lResident etc.... lbefore turning into the 175 turn lanes Respondent Start Date Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question Question 5 Question Question Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 a. b. C. d. ID 4 6 7 modest community with no clout, will be trapped along much of our western border (Livingston) with a giant concrete wall. I think this causes several issues: 1) Noise --already an issue, a raised roadway will make the noise much worse 2) Access --I am uncertain now far north on Livingston the construction will go to provide the overpass. The main entrance to Carlton Lakes is "to be discussed." Somehow, I have the feeling any change will benefit Alfie Oakes and not Carlton Lakes. At our back entrance, we are able to go either north or south on Livingston, but it is quite dangerous. I believe we need a traffic light there so that Carlton Lakes and Delasol have a safe way to get onto Livingston. The typical U-turn solution is terrible --you need at least two lanes to be open to safely make a U-turn-- and maybe three if you drive a large vehicle, and with increased traffic levels this is really unsafe. 3) Property values will likely drop as Carlton Lakes becomes harder to access and noisier. The real problem is that the Developers rule! They Direct all bought property speculatively, and notification now seem to be able to increase the units from HOA, they want to build to line their pockets. At least Less than At least friend, Yes, these are tax payers for the county, Every once a once a once a Year -Round neighbor, 12567980027 4/12/21 but the negative impact never seems to day Every day month imonth week Yes INo Resident etc.... Do not agree with this proposal. I have used This can be incredibly confusing the Daniels for elderly drivers, who are not Parkway accustomed to modern traffic intersection At least At least At least At least resolutions. That is my only and it is Every once a once a once a once a Year -Round 12567851504 4/12/21 Agree with this proposal. IYes Iconcern. I horrible. Jday 1week 1week 1week 1week INo INo lResident I Social media Respondent Start Date Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question Question 5 Question Question Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 a. b. C. d. ID 4 6 7 recommend ation seems to be a short term solution with an acknowledg ement of an overpass at a later date. Why spend the money for an interim solution when we know Stone The 1 Mile Study Area is skewed. There is DIRECT IMPACT to Quail Creek Estates Creek is still which is road -locked with Valewood as the only egress/ingress (and even with an building; we alternative second entrance being only possible on Logan); A significant portion of know Oaks Cypress Woods is road -locked to Tarpon Bay. Perhaps this was taken into account? is still The amount of growth along this corridor -- including on the south side of building Immokalee and all work to the East is concerning not only from a roads perspective, (and there but from a water management perspective. As we continue to allow growth, the signage and road arrow painting is a pending Canal takes on more and more water during rainy season, as do lower lying grounds will be critical with this type of study for in existing neighborhoods. I implore the County to make plans that address the change -- and considering factors connectivity long term with the roadways for a cost and a disruption perspective, as well as such as seasonal visitors, short of certain considering how this level of growth will harm the environment as well as the term visitors, and the percentage roads to livability of Collier County -- Immokalee Road is rapidly looking more and more like of older drivers. The flow as Logan At least 41 in Fort Myers. Medians and Trees and buffer zones are incredibly important to I don't depicted appears to offer a and/or Oaks Every once a Every Year -Round quality of life and our property values. (Golden Gate Parkway by Airport is 12567839352 4/12/21 know Isignificant improvement. Blvd, and day Everyday lEveryday week day INo No Resident Social media beautifully done). Thank you for your careful consideration. Direct notification That should help congestion on from HOA, Please continue the study east to 951. Immokalee is so heavy with traffic that we Immokalee Road going through. friend, try to avoid it between 3 and 7pm in season. Not sure how it could be stopped but It is always a hassle to go east or Every Every Year -Round neighbor, with additional developments going in off of Immokalee east of us, Heritage 1256783422514/12/21 Yes 1west under 1-75 day Every day Everyday lEveryday day Yes INo Resident etc.... Greens, I am very concerned. Too hard to get out of our neighborhood as it is! Lights East and West bound lanes should longer. It's a 6 lane road Not going to work if the building compared Collier doesn't stop East of Immokalee to two and Every Every Year -Round County Better public transportation. Like a Monorail system. Or better yet... stop the 12567649040 4/12/21 No Yes Rd and 951. Too many people. four lanes. day Everyday Everyday lEveryday day No IYes Resident website building East of 951/Collier Blvd and Immokalee Rd. Less At least than Every once a once a Year -Round 12567550898 4/12/21 No day Every day Every day week month Yes No Resident Social media Respondent Question Question 5 Question Question Start Date Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 a. b. C. d. ID 4 6 7 Direct Good for notification through from HOA, traffic, Atleast Atleast friend, Good idea, training will be learning Every once a once a Every Year -Round neighbor, 1256671808114/12/21 Yes I needed. Should elevate backlog curve day week Every day 1week day Yes IYes Resident etc.... Many driver's block Valewood intersection driving west on immoklee, any relief? The problem starts at Collier Blvd and not from Logan. Please consider a comprehensive solution that includes Atleast Atleast Atleast from where the traffic originates. Get to Every once a once a once a Year -Round 12566640269 4/12/21 the source of the problem. Yes day Every day month week week No Yes Resident Social media You need to build 1-75 exit on Vanderbilt Rd to help with the traffic. Less At least At least At least Less than than once a once a once a once a once a Year -Round 12566639592 4/12/21 No month month month month month No No Resident Social media At least At least GGP is so well done. Would like to see I don't Every once a once a Year -Round 12566599980 4/12/21 that at Livingston. Collier will need it, too. know day Every day month Every day month No No Resident Social media 1) How is congestion on Immokalee helped if traffic operations are largely unchanged on Immokalee? 2) What are the impacts on the Delasol Lane & Livingston intersection? The N/S traffic light on Livingston at Immokalee creates Direct traffic breaks allowing left turns onto notification Livingstion. Without the traffic breaks, left from HOA, turns will become more dangerous. Does At least friend, this necessitate a traffic light at Delasol Every once a Every Year -Round neighbor, 12566537150 4/12/21 Lane & Livingston? Yes day Everyday lEveryday month day Yes Resident etc.... feels a little strange at first but At least you get used to it. The diverging Every once a Every Year -Round 12566535005 4/12/21 Yes diamond was in St, Cloud, MN day week Everyday Everyday day No Yes Resident Social media It would be good but the NB needs to be 2 lanes and there should be no turn on red. I make a u turn here everyday and the right turn do not look or slow down. Have It looks good but some people been almost hit by a school bus, trash can't do a normal road. This At least At least At least Collier truck, trucks, etc.. I have large vehicle that could be an accident waiting to This would Every once a once a once a Year -Round County 12566422388 4/12/21 you can't miss. Yes 1happen be good day Every day 1week week week Yes No Resident website More police present at the intersections giving out tickets would be great. Atleast At least At least At least Atleast once a once a once a once a once a Year -Round 12566415285 4/12/21 Yes week week week week week No No Resident Social media Respondent Question Question 5 Question Question Start Date Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 a. b. C. d. ID 4 6 7 Install a traffic light on the corner of Delasol LN and Livingston 3/4 mi. North of Immokalee (already has left and right turn lanes into Delasol and the North gate of Carlton Lakes). Construct a 2 lane access road along the East side of Livingston from the existing Carlton Lakes main entrance North to the Carlton North gate and therefore the new traffic light. Close off the existing access from Carlton to Livingston. This access road from the new Delasol/Carlton traffic light would serve to access Carlton (both entrances) as well as the side parking lot of the new Oakes market. This would help Carlton Lakes, Delasol, and Oakes while easing traffic flow along Livingston as it ramps up to the At least At least LIVINGSTON IS GOING TO BE A NIGHTMARE DURING CONSTRUCTION (NO proposed Immokalee overpass. CHUCK LOTS OF CONFUSION FOR A Every once a once a Every Year -Round ALTERNATIVE ROADS EITHER SIDE OF LIVINGSTON NORTH OF IMMOKALEE). 1256620620614/12/21 VALERY 239-593-9329. No WHILE ! day Every day week imonth day Yes IYes Resident Social media TEMPORARY ROAD BY THE FPL POWER LINES ? At least Every once a Year -Round 12566191739 4/12/21 day week Every day Yes Resident Social media Extend Collier Blvd north of Immokalee to Bonita springs Road sooner than later At least At least At least Every once a once a once a Year -Round Glad you're looking at this. Also, the lack of synchronization of the traffic lights in 12566153369 4/12/21 Excellent idea! Yes Another good proposal. day week week Every day week No No Resident Social media this stretch also needs to be examined. Thanks. At least At least At least At least Collier I don't once a once a once a once a Year -Round County 12566089447 4/11/21 know week week week Every day week Yes No Resident website Traffic needs to be diverted further east of Logan perhaps at Collier Blvd. Other At least than Logan there is no access to Bonita Beach Rd. Also. East of Collier build Every once a Every Year -Round thoroughfare to Pine Ridge. TWith all the building east of Collier Blvd this is only 12566077976 4/11/21 Concur Yes Concur Concur day Every day Every day week day Yes No Resident Social media going to get worse Direct I am a resident of the Delasol community notification on Livingston Rd. just north of Immokalee from HOA, Rd. I like this concept but would urge a At least Less than friend, traffic light to the north at the Every once a once a Every Year -Round neighbor, 12566055150 4/11/21 intersection of Delasol Ln. and Livingston. No It seems to make sense. day Every day week imonth day Yes lNo Resident etc.... Traffic light at Delasol Ln. and Livingston Rd., please. At least At least Less than At least once a once a once a once a Year -Round 12566038231 4/11/21 week week month week Yes No Resident Social media At least At least At least At least At least I live in Ave Maria and work part time in Naples and all of my doctors are in Naples once a once a once a once a once a Year -Round and I stay off of Immoklee rd by using Desoto and Golden Gate. Much easier & 12566002460 4/11/21 No No week week week week week No No Resident Social media safer. Respondent Start. Date Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question Question 5 Question Question Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 a. b. C. d. ID 4 6 7 At least At least At least Collier If it helps congestion then i agree with I don't Every once a once a once a Year -Round County 12565948557 4/11/21 proposal. know day week week Every day week Yes No Resident website Direct notification from HOA, friend, I don't Every Every Year -Round neighbor, 12565943462 4/11/211 know day I Every day Every day Every day Iday Yes No I Resident etc.... What's really needed is a north south road at or east of Collier. It would Seasonal Direct help to Resident notification provide (temporary from HOA, Has there been any consideration to data on how At least At least At least residence at friend, extending a thruway on Collier Rd to this would Every once a once a once a Every least 1 month neighbor, As mentioned, please provide rationales and data on the proposed options so that 12565934532 4/11/21 Bonita Beach Rd in lieu of this? No How does this help traffic flow? help. day week week 1week day Yes IYes per year) etc.... it would be easier to evaluate these plans. Thank you! The overpass should run on Immokalee I lived in Ave Maria since 2007 so I've seen the growth, I remember when the rd. From a half mile west of i75 to a half planning commission said the Oil Well road project was a road to nowhere. There mile east. Similar to Golden gate parkway was no money to totally expand to 4 lanes dividend. Now look at Immokalee rd and over airport pulling. Take a look at the At least Collier oil well rd. Put the money in the budget, let the builders and developers pay the east coast ft.lauderdale area with all the Rather have the overpass on Every once a Year -Round County additional impact fees to build the overpass. Just my thoughts. I grew up in Detroit, 12565890718 4/11/21 fly overs. Yes Immokalee rd. Yes great day Every day Every day Every day month No INo Resident website they never addressed a mass transit fix in the 70's and 80's so this is what happens. Every Every Year -Round 12565845673 4/11/21 No day Every day Every day day Yes No Resident Social media At least At least At least Less than At least Can you start building it once a once a once a once a once a Year -Round I heard about the study through TV news report; I don't consider that social media 12565844265 4/11/21 This is a great idea. Yes tomorrow? month week month month month No No Resident so none of the answers above were appropriate for me. I travel this route twice a day 5 days a week. Largest issue I see is I see a lot of issues with how long the stop when 1-75 northbound is backed Direct lights are currently set. It builds large up results in additional drivers notification groups of vehicles commencing travel at existing on Immokalee Rd. thus from HOA, one time. If shortened stop light times adding to bottleneck for both Shorten At least friend, We seriously need to think of the continued over development of this area. If other would result in smaller groups of vehicles east and westbound Immokalee stop light Every once a Every Year -Round neighbor, means of transportation are not possible then we are forced to reduce the 12565842495 4/11/21 traveling together. No Itravel. times. day Every day Everyday imonth day Yes INo Resident etc.... introduction of more residence. The preponderance of traffic lights between Logan and Livingston are currently backing the traffic up to standstills so that triangle design doesn't change that. The traffic that doesn't enter 175 and remains east or westbound on Immokalee rd will I don't still increase and back up at the 12565833086 4/11/211 know lexisting lights. Respondent Start Date Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question Question 5 Question Question Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 a. b. C. d. ID 4 6 7 At least I live in Huntington Lakes, we high is right in the center of all this congestion. I'm sure it Every once a Every Year -Round Anything you can do will be greatly appreciated. It's effecting our property values 12565705140 4/11/21 1 think that would be helpful. No would help! day Every day Every day week day Yes No Resident Social media and our nerves. At least Every once a Every Year -Round 12565699966 4/11/21 Yes day Every day week Every day day Yes Yes Resident Social media Less than Bad idea. Won't make a Every once a Every Year -Round Good luck. Widen the on ramps to 75, that gets so backed up cause most of the 12565687496 4/11/21 No difference. day Every day Every day month day Yes Yes Resident Social media traffic in the afternoon. Logan and Immokalee has just become worse with increased slow traffic flow. This looks better. Because If the overpass configuration has reduced If this recommendation reduces what is the number of accidents as opposed to confusion and increases traffic there is not adding turning lanes then that is a flow, because waiting for lights to effective for At least At least At least At least It is good that you are working on a solution to increase the flow of traffic on solution and increase the smooth flow of change in the heat is not fuel traffic once a once a once a once a Year -Round Immokallee as increased building of homes to the east of 1-75 and truck traffic 12565673634 4/11/21 traffic, then this is good. No efficient. volume. week 1week Every day week 1week Yes No lResident Social media usually has me bypassing the road whenever possible, rush hour is a bear. The main focusfor this completion should definitely be in the west bound direction. Kids and parents leaving Love these intersections. They school from keep traffic flowing on and off Gulf Coast the Interstate and they decrease and Laurel the number of places an accident Oak and can occur. Will definitely help going home with rush hour on and off of 75. live on My only concern is when 75 may Logan cause I feel as though there is not enough traffic have lots of traffic, the the most I believe the main focus should be getting people onto 1-75. It's the heart of on Livingston throughout the day to intersection maybe get extremely traffic Less Immokalee Road. The diamond intersection would be a fantastic addition my next recommend a big change like this. It congested. I haven't driven during end than At least concern will be traffic cause by the construction though. With limited room and won't help regulate traffic onto through one that has been busy of school once a once a Every Year -Round difficult and long detours the traffic will only get worse before it gets better. But the 12565636142 4/11/21 Immokalee Rd it will increase it. IYes Ithough so this may never happen. hours. Imonth lEveryday lEveryday Imonth Jday Yes INo I Resident ISocial media Isooner it begins the sooner we will see the results. Respondent Question Question 5 Question Question Start Date Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 a. b. C. d. ID 4 6 7 Yes do what you can to Direct make the notification traffic from HOA, Good lord where do I even begin ? It better at At least friend, usually takes 2 light changes to turn onto this Every once a Every Year -Round neighbor, 12565602388 4/11/21 Livingston. No intersection day week Everyday lEveryday day Yes INo Resident etc.... Direct notification Less from HOA, I think anything that can help the Livingston-Immokalee intersection is a good thing. At least Less than Less than than friend, To go to work, I have to head north on Livingston and take a U-turn to eventually once a once a once a once a Year -Round neighbor, head south. That one maneuver can be troublesome with all the folks heading east 12565573012 4/11/21 week Every day month imonth month Yes INo Resident etc.... on Immokalee trying to turn right while we're u-turning. Seasonal Resident (temporary At least At least At least At least At least residence at Collier I don't once a once a once a once a once a least 1 month County 12565570308 4/11/21 Like it know IShould help week week week 1week week Yes INo per year) website I live in along Oil well hoping some of the other north south and east west improvements will allow me to use alternate routes to get where I need to like livingston extension. Is there any way to provide a video modeling how these traffic patterns would work with cars? Hard to tell by this graphic how traffic is suppose to flow for the projects at least hard for me. Back up also occurs at gulf coast high school left turn lane in the mornings I know lanes have already been extended but it keeps happening and as more houses come online to the east don't see that getting Every Every Year -Round any better. Also found out about this survey from WINK news not sure if that fits in 12565552506 4/11/21 Would agree these back ups occur quite r day Every day Everyday lEveryday day No INo Resident Social media the options provided. Yes. I like this too. Logan Blvd would also need to be widened to 4 lanes from Immokalee This overpass could be helpful as long as Road to At least At least At least At least "local" traffic can still get to Seed to Table Terrific. I have used the one in Bonita once a once a once a once a Year -Round 12565531993 4/11/21 store. IYes Isarasota. 113each Road. 1week 1week Imonth I imonth JNo INo lResident Isocial media 11mmokalee Road is a FAILED road. Let's get it fixed. Respondent Start Date Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question Question 5 Question Question Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 a. b. C. d. ID 4 6 7 Seasonal What about a simple cloverleaf Resident Off season I live in a very large city where intersections go under or over a major where all ramps on to highways (temporary highway and they have built cloverleaf ramps onto the highway with all entrance are to the right. Also for At least At least At least At least At least residence at ramps to either direction of the highway come off the feeder road to the right. With immediate relief take away the once a once a once a once a once a least 1 month no left hand turns onto the highway and longer ramps to the right the traffic 12565517753 4/11/21 Yes I left hand turns on to 75. week week week 1week week Yes JNo per year) Social media situation is much alleviated on the feeder road such as Immokalee. Need to eliminate on -ramp lane drop. This is a major source of congestion. There are presently 4 lanes of traffic that converge Good idea At least At least into (ultimately) ONE on -ramp but lower Every once a once a Every Year -Round 12565466050 4/11/21 Good idea but lower priority. Yes onto 1-75 North. priority day week Every day week day Yes No Resident Social media Long overdue, thank you. Have not had good experiences Every Every Year -Round 12565436553 4/11/21 Good idea. Yes with these. Good idea. day Every day Every day Every day day No No Resident Social media Seasonal Direct Resident notification (temporary from HOA, STUPID! Cloverleaf designs need At least At least At least At least At least residence at friend, Can you coordinate all traffic lights at these intersections with computer software NO traffic lights and keep traffic once a once a once a once a once a least 1 month neighbor, that constantly optimized light timing to move traffic and minimize wait times? Call 12565436138 4/11/21 Yes Imoving much better! week month week imonth month No INo per year) etc.... Carnegie Mellon University. They work on these programs. It would be helpful, but what will happen with bike lanes? Also, with more and more traffic on Livingston, and new developments being added, there needs to be a stop light at the entrance to Delasol/Carlton Lakes. Making a left out of Delasol to travel north on Livingston is increasingly dangerous, especially in season; but if you elect to turn right (south) to go to the U-turn turnaround, you have to travel almost to the Immokalee intersection --and with heavy Seed to Table traffic, that's becoming more dangerous, too. (Looks like the Add more stoplights at new and existing developments to slow traffic and improve overpass might eliminate the current safety for residents. And make improvements now, before there's more gridlock turnaround point as well, giving residents and traffic becomes more horrendous. Permitting the Seed to Table parking lot of Delasol no safe alternatives when they across the street from the store was a disastrous decision. Employees are not want to travel north on Livingston.) P.S. supposed to cross the street as pedestrians, but they do this all the time. Similarly, Why has a car dealership been approved the store has attracted more pedestrians, bikers and occasionally protesters, all of near this corner on the SE side of which make driving more dangerous and difficult. Please ban gatherings on public Immokalee? That will add an insane At least At least property like sidewalks near the store, and do something to prevent Seed to Table amount of traffic at an already Every once a once a Every Year -Round employees from jaywalking across the street. Weren't they supposed to take a 12565092794 4/11/211 problematic intersection. INo I I Jday lEveryday 1week 1week Jday IYes INo lResident Isocial media Ishuttle from the parking lot, paid for by Alfie Oakes? Respondent Start Date Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question Question 5 Question Question Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 a. b. C. d. ID 4 6 7 Seasonal Resident (temporary At least At least At least At least At least residence at Collier I don't once a once a once a once a once a least 1 month County 12565088815 4/11/21 Would be helpful know JAny improvement is needed week week 1week week week No INo per year) website that idea at all it makes for dangerous driving promoting more aggressive driving. They also use that pattern on east bound lanes on Alicia Rd. Both Daniels& Alicia have to many people It's OK, not great. Still don't cutting understand why you didn't do drivers off the four leaf clover design that trying to was originally planned 10 or 15 jump the years ago. That clover design line and get doesn't have ANY traffic cross in last oncoming lanes to exit or enter second. Also 175 thus keeping everything since Naples flowing more fluidly without keeps it's At least Collier Yes you should definitely go forward with needing green lights to cross over beauty Every once a Year -Round County Let's try and get it right the first time. Not just for now but also the foreseeable 12565064594 4/11/21 SPUI plan to help keep traffic moving. Yes stopping oncoming traffic. restricting day Every day Everyday lEveryday week No INo Resident website future. Good Luck A larger map showing where the overpass begins & ends with better detail (mile legend) would help to understand this proposal. I live on Livingston Rd near the Regional Park. The nearby communities would be impacted by construction of an overpass even with a positive outcome for future traffic. What's the plan for At least At least At least entering/exiting communities & Regional Every once a once a once a Every Year -Round 12565031453 4/11/21 Park? INo I I Jday 1week 1week 1week Jday IYes INo lResident I I I heard about study/survey on WINK NEWS. Respondent Question Question 5 Question Question Start. Date Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 a. b. C. d. ID 4 6 7 Seasonal Resident (temporary At least residence at Collier Every once a least 1 month County 12564971476 4/11/21 day Every day Everyday lEveryday month Yes INo per year) website At least At least At least Every once a once a once a Year -Round 12564947812 4/11/21 No day week week Every day week No No Resident Social media Less than Less than At least Less than At least Collier once a once a once a once a once a Year -Round County Could there be an inclosed sidewalk for cyclists to protect them from cars and the 12564944555 4/11/21 Yes month month week month week No No Resident website sun? At least Collier Every once a Year -Round County 12564944140 4/11/21 No day Every day Every day Every day week No No Resident website At least I don't Every once a Every Year -Round 12564942180 4/11/21 This appears to be a reasonable plan. know day Every day Every day week day Yes Yes Resident Social media At least once a Every Year -Round 12564930066 4/11/21 Yes Every day week Every day day No Yes Resident Social media The congestion is located on Immokalee I believe it and Northbrook Roads, (westbound on I believe it would be very would Immokalee) way before you get to confusing to certain individuals, confuse At least Collier Livingston. Also making it hard to get causing accidents & further some Every once a Every Year -Round County Making another exit ramp off 175 located onto Vanderbilt Beach Rd, north and 12564927881 4/11/21 access to 175 north ramp. Yes congestion. individuals day Every day Every day week day Yes No Resident website south. Coming east on Immokalee Direct Road to notification Logan Blvd from HOA, None. I only drive that way once in a blue you need a Less than friend, Getting to 175 from Immokalee Road near. Northbrook you have two lanes going to moon but the last time was not enough The lights longer especially at the longer turn Every once a Every None of the neighbor, 75 then it merges to one which could cause lost of accidents so maybe you can look 12564898212 4/11/21 time for cars to get through No IStrand and Immokalee Road lane day month Everyday lEveryday day No INo above etc.... into thst. You have more people moving to this area with only in main thoroughfare since you Collier have all of these private communities. It's very frustrating to travel since there's Yes they should do it. This is a busy I don't Every Every Year -Round County only one way in or out and if there's any issue, you're stuck. Since so much building 12564887038 4/11/21 interchange know day Every day Every day Every day day Yes No Resident website is happening further down Immokalee you need to address it now. Respondent Start Date Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question Question 5 Question Question Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 a. b. C. d. ID 4 6 7 Get rid of the stop signs at old cypress entrance that shouldn't be there to begin with. Traffic backs up heading north all the way to At least At least At least immokalee Every once a once a once a Year -Round 12564815436 4/11/21 Yes Ird. day week month Every day week No INo Resident Please look at Immokalee Rd. further east Not sure Collier to Quarry Drive. With all the building at that will Every Every Year -Round County 12564756333 4/11/21 Immokalee & Collier it will be a nightmare. No No help. day Every day Everyday Everyday day Yes Yes Resident website Please go the extra mile and review Logan East to Collier. I think this would be a great solution. Once people drive through a diverging Diamond, it At least Collier I'm happy a study is being done, but I hope Collier and the state can move quickly becomes second nature. Collier Every once a Every Year -Round County on the results and ground can be broken on the mater. It will only continue to get 12564752540 4/11/21 Yes residents will pick it up quickly. day Every day Every day month day Yes No Resident website busier as the years go by, let's make a solution! It appears the turns signals are The main issue is westbound only for lanes going North on 175. Traffic turning left. The recommendation seems to be similar backs up to Logan or further daily If that is not to Airport and GG Parkway which works without an accident. EMS/Fire the case do well. Livingston's traffic flow is worse are hindered exiting the station not add Direct north toward the Lee County line where a on Immokalee by Logan. The anymore notification lane is list to 2. This hinders flow during northbound traffic heading West traffic from HOA, rush hour, hurricane evac, and accidents has to flow continuously or have signals on At least At least At least At least At least friend, This has been an issue since Immokalee Rd was improved years ago. Longer left on 175. The North/ South options need a dedicated lane. The room Immokalee once a once a once a once a once a Year -Round neighbor, turn lanes are sometimes not the answer as traffic routinely backs up to traffic 12563843401 4/10/21 addressing as well. Yes lexists for barriers or a flyover. Rd. week week week 1week week No INo Resident etc.... causing delays and accidents. I hope this can get started soon. I don't Every Every Year -Round The traffic is insane everyday! I have to drive this road multiple times a day and it 12561225356 4/9/21 know day Every day Every day Every day day Yes No Resident Social media make me have major anxiety. Respondent Question Question 5 Question Question Start. Date Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 a. b. C. d. ID 4 6 7 1 do not believe this schematic represents Direct either a notification I don't believe this approach will address significant from HOA, the congestion going E/W Immokolee Rd. change or At least At least At least At least friend, I believe this plan misses the mark entirely. The most congestion currently occurs itself, which is far greater than the traffic improvemen once a once a once a once a Year -Round neighbor, almost the entirity of Immokolee Rd., but on Livingston back up is not really 12560785005 4/9/21 going N/S on Livingston. Yes t. week Every day month 1week week Yes INo Resident etc.... significant until reaching the light at Immokolee and Livingston. We need a bridge or another option aside At least from immokalee to travel To and from Hardly will Every once a Every Year -Round 12560407737 4/9/21 living in the estates due to traffic No This won't help help day week Every day Every day day Yes Yes Resident Social media There has to be better Options Seasonal Direct Resident notification (temporary from HOA, Hopefully it will help the area without At least At least At least residence at friend, being too unattractive. The backups on I don't once a once a once a Every least 1 month neighbor, 12560182182 4/9/21 Immokalee Riad can be awful know week Every day week 1week day Yes INo per year) etc.... Getting out of Stand Boulevard can take a very long time At least I don't Every once a Every Year -Round 12559988329 4/9/21 no know No No day week Every day Every day day Yes Yes Resident Social media At least Every once a Every Year -Round Traffic is so bad on immokalee I try to avoid it and want my kids to go to the new 12559862974 4/9/21 No day Every day month Every day day Yes Yes Resident Social media charter school out there but worried only about traffic Direct notification from HOA, At least At least At least At least friend, once a once a once a once a Year -Round neighbor, 12559662097 4/9/21 Think this is a good solution. Yes IGood solution. week week 1week week No INo Resident etc.... At least At least At least At least At least once a once a once a once a once a Year -Round 12559446633 4/9/21 Yes month month month month month No No Resident Social media At least At least At least At least once a once a once a once a Year -Round 12559434640 4/9/21 This would be great! Yes week week Every day week week No No Resident Social media If it's going to help with traffic issues, these changes will be great! At least At least At least At least I don't Every once a once a once a once a Year -Round 12559412506 4/9/21 know day week week week week Yes Resident Social media Best wishes with a most consequential project. Respondent Start Date Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question Question 5 Question Question Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 a. b. C. d. ID 4 6 7 Safe left turn egress from Carlton Lakes Blvd. needs to be considered. As a result of the single point interchange, the flows and available gaps on Livingston NB will change significantly and make it more difficult for exiting Carlton Lake traffic wishing to make a U turn to go SB on Livingston. Safety is a concern because of the increased speeds which will occur on Livingston, probable reduced sight distance due to the over vertical, and shortened length available to weave across three lanes of traffic to make the U turn to go SB on Livingston. In addition, traffic growth on Livingston will continue to increase reducing available SB gaps for Seasonal Direct the U turn movement. This together with Resident notification high volumes of U turns and high speeds (temporary from HOA, on Livingston are a safety concern. residence at friend, Recommend that this concern be added least 1 month neighbor, 12559046401 4/8/21 to the study. IYes No I per year) etc.... Immoklee and Livingston is a very dangerous intersection, too many frequent accidents. For example, 99% of drivers coming from the west on Immoklee turning Seasonal Direct right/south on Livingston do not yield to us making a u turn to go south on Resident notification Livingston when we have the right of way. Too many people also running red lights (temporary from HOA, at this intersection. Between all of the congestion , u turns, it is a very dangerous residence at friend, intersection for all drivers and improvements are crucial to everyone's safety. We Every Every least 1 month neighbor, Livingston Lakes residents can only exit our community by going through this 12558484978 4/8/21 No Iday Every day Everyday lEveryday day Yes INo per year) etc.... dangerous intersection. Survey needs to be extend eastward to include the intersection of immokalee Rd Every Every Year -Round and Col 951. With new development occuring. new retail/condo on the corner and 12558406459 4/8/21 Sounds good Yes Sounds good Sounds good day Every day Every day Every day day Yes Yes Resident Social media numerous schools, if we looking out into the future this should be considered now. Direct notification from HOA, At least At least At least At least friend, I don't once a once a once a once a Year -Round neighbor, 1255833805814/8/21 know week week week Every day week Yes INo Resident etc.... Seasonal Resident (temporary At least residence at I don't once a Every least 1 month 12557304899 4/8/211 1know I I 1week lEveryday lEveryday lEveryday Jday IYes INo per year) I Social media I Regardless something has to be done. Respondent Question Question 5 Question Question Start Date Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 a. b. C. d. ID 4 6 7 1 would add another overpass I think a jug handle/clover leaf here. So this interchange is more suitable. It interchange would potentially eliminate 2 never gets traffic lights. In my opinion as bad as eliminating as many lights as Livingston I agree an overpass would be very possible without compromising and Every Every Year -Round 12557114018 4/8/21 beneficial. No safety would be beneficial. immokalee. day Everyday Everyday lEveryday day No INo Resident Social media Would like to hear updates on this as soon as possible. Seasonal Resident (temporary At least At least At least residence at Every once a once a once a least 1 month Email 12555643938 4/7/21 Yes Iday week week I Every day week No INo per year) notification these types of intersections take some "getting use to" the first few times you drive thru them. It would be helpful if there would be an informative Why did the study not continue down to Collier Blvd? I live in Heritage Greens, and communication as what to At least the traffic congestion makes it very difficult to exit our community. Could the study expect. Maybe a TV or Radio Every once a Year -Round be increased to include the issues that exist and are growing between Logan and 12555332256 4/7/21 Yes 1commercial, etc. day Everyday Everyday lEveryday week Yes INo Resident Social media Collier? Seasonal Resident (temporary At least At least At least residence at Every once a once a once a least 1 month 12554944320 4/7/21 This would be an improvement. Yes Iday week week I Every day week Yes INo per year) Social media Why isn't a "study " being done further east on Immokalee Rd. prior to allowing "villages" of thousands of new homes and car traffic? What about Collier blvd and Immokalee Road? How is Immokalee Road to handles the new traffic which will Seems the best alternative to At least At least At least At least At least severely impact the residents REGARDLESS of how close they live to your current keep traffic moving from all once a once a once a once a once a Year -Round Email study area? This study has a huge gap in assessing traffic volume by giving a choice 12554911201 4/7/21 No Idirections. week week week 1week week No INo Resident notification of usage with frequency every day or at least once a week. Direct notification from HCA, Traffic congestion in front of the Heritage Greens Community entrance/exit is At least At least At least At least At least friend, horrendously congested and dangerous for residents trying to get out and then I don't once a once a once a once a once a Year -Round neighbor, make a u-turn at Immokalee Road and Preserve Lane. There is a designated "do not 12553877182 4/7/2 11 No 1know INo INo 1week 1week 1week 1week 1week IYes INo I Resident etc.... block" area when the light is red, but it is rarely observed. Please help us! Respondent Start Date Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question Question 5 Question Question Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 a. b. C. d. ID 4 6 7 This is Yes my husband was part of the horrible exit 213 paving crew! Those are idea. Have not typical for Florida with the any of you amount of tourists we have actually yearly. Make it difficult for them driven the I think you should really evaluate the loss of tourist $$ when you make do This I personally don't mind however I and us native born collier Daniels and something like exit 213 or Daniels and 82. Neither are good. And no I'm not expert feel this is just a get back at Seed to Table. residents lose that $$$ they bring 82 Every Every Year -Round but I've been around asphalt for 30 years and collier is full of poorly designed 12553867137 4/6/21 So it's whatever. Yes yearly!! intersection? day Every day Everyday lEveryday day No INo Resident Social media parking lots. So it wouldn't be surprising for it to be approved At least At least Anything would help!!! It's Every once a once a Every Year -Round 12553818164 4/7/21 Yes horrible in season. Good idea! day week week Every day day Yes Yes Resident Social media Why continue to allow development when the roads need so much Direct improvement. Don't develop until notification roadways are in place Why not put the from HOA, overpass on Immokalee. Most of the At least At least At least friend, traffic is west/east. Need more info Every once a once a once a Year -Round neighbor, Stop building until roadways are improved. Why the year 2045 is being used when 12553656649 4/7/21 regarding the impact on Carlton Lakes No day Every day week 1week week Yes INo Resident etc.... its totally congested now. If 175 is backed up, Immokalee Rd is a nightmare Direct notification from HOA, friend, If it will not improve traffic why spend the Excellent Every Every Year -Round neighbor, 12553587306 4/7/21 money No idea day Every day Everyday lEveryday day No INo Resident etc.... Improve the infrastructure At least At least Every once a once a Every Year -Round 12553477407 4/7/21 This would be great! No day week week Every day day Yes No Resident Social media Seasonal Resident (temporary At least At least At least At least residence at Collier once a once a once a once a least 1 month County Too many cars. Too many people. Too much new resident housing. Too much 12553355093 4/7/21 week week 1week week No INo per year) website destruction of natural resources. "The tragedy of the commons" At least At least At least At least If it helps divert traffic off once a once a once a once a Year -Round 12553002437 4/7/21 Agree with recommendation No Immokalee I am in favor it. Agree week week week Every day week No No Resident Social media Glad you are looking for traffic solutions Every Every Year -Round 12552958118 4/7/21 Yes day Every day Every day Every day day Yes No Resident Social media Direct notification from HOA, Looks like something you see in Fort At least friend, Lauderdale! Ugly and doesn't fit in with I don't Every once a Every Year -Round neighbor, 12552808916 4/7/21 surrounding area. 1know I I Jday lEveryday 1week lEveryday Jday INo INo lResident etc.... Respondent Question Question 5 Question Question Start Date Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 a. b. C. d. ID 4 6 7 Not really sure how Seasonal These are pretty intimidating. I this would Resident think it may create confusion work, ut (temporary That is a great idea. The one on GGP rather than help. And when they should At least At least residence at The "frequency of use" question is misleading. I may not use each of those works well and traffic moves smoothly some people get confused they try to keep Every once a once a least 1 month intersections daily but I do use them more than once a week --probably 2-3 times 12552722349 4/6/21 w/o stopping. Yes just stop dead in traffic! it simple. day week Every day week Yes Yes per year) Social media per week each. what you're talking about. Don't see what's wrong with intersection now. It's too bad ROADS aren't considered before the County approves all the developmen ts. Developmen t East of Collier Blvd will only make matter so much There needs to be something done worse. Has further E of Logan. We live in Heritage county Greens and have terrible time exiting our increased community. We can't use any other way impact fees At least At least At least At least At least You say drive safe!! HaHa every deputies say it's awful now on Immokalee clear to to exit, just Immokalee Rd. There needs I don't 1-75 should have been 8-12 lanes for all the once a once a once a once a once a Year -Round Collier Blvd and they can't issue speeding tickets. Most on Immokalee Rd drive 50- 12552707925 4/6/21 to continue to be 3 thru traffic lanes. know 1when last increased to 6 lanes. developmen week month month 1week week Yes INo Resident Social media 60 MPH. Totally unsafe. At least At least At least At least At least Collier once a once a once a once a once a Year -Round County 12552655383 4/6/21 week week month week week No No Resident website Respondent Question Question 5 Question Question Start Date Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 a. b. C. d. ID 4 6 7 Logan and Immokalee needsto remain green longer North and South bound. There is so much traffic and I've seen so many cars run the light. Also, the left turn heading southeast should be longer during the school year. There are many cars again who do not want to wait so I think it's a good idea, especially with they Seed to Table there and all the extra suddenly Every Every Year -Round 12552645281 4/6/21 traffic. No cut right, go day Every day Every day Every day Jday Yes INo Resident Social media Thank you! Direct notification from HOA, At least At least At least At least At least friend, once a once a once a once a once a Year -Round neighbor, 12552608521 4/6/21 No Iweek week week 1week week No INo Resident etc.... Every Every Year -Round 12552432042 4/6/21 1 think it will work I like this idea No day Every day Every day Every day day Yes No Resident Social media Anything you do will make it better, thank you Seasonal Resident (temporary This seem unnecessarily complex because At least At least At least residence at The traffic on Immokalee is horrendous, far beyond these intersections. What this intersection is not the problem on Every once a once a once a least 1 month makes this particular part of Immokalee so bad has to do with the sequence of 12552184668 4/6/21 Immokalee. No day week Every day 1week week No INo per year) Social media lights between Logan and Livingston, which do not seem to be synchronized. At least At least At least At least At least once a once a once a once a once a Year -Round With all the new construction east of that area on Immokalee, I believe the 12552122702 4/6/21 week week week week month Yes No Resident Social media congestion in this corridor will worsen rapidly. Respondent Start Date Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question Question 5 Question Question Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 a. b. C. d. ID 4 6 7 Direct notification from HOA, At least At least At least friend, I don't Every once a once a once a Year -Round neighbor, 12551980160 4/6/21 Good Idea know IGoodldea day Every day week imonth week Yes INo Resident etc.... This is a new concept for me and very challenging to drive on what traditional is the wrong side of the road I could learn to navigate an intersection like this but I'm not sure other Florida drivers could. My observation is that At least At least At least At least At least many Florida drivers have trouble once a once a once a once a once a Year -Round Email 12551963507 4/6/21 No 1driving in a straight line. week week week 1week week No INo Resident notification Direct notification from HOA, friend, Every Every Year -Round neighbor, 12551958329 4/6/21 day Every day Everyday lEveryday day Yes IYes Resident etc.... Direct notification from HOA, friend, Every Every Year -Round neighbor, 12551914193 4/6/21 No Iday Every day Everyday lEveryday day No IYes Resident etc.... As long as the entry ramps would Direct no longer be controlled by stop notification The next study needs report move further out Immokalee Rd to include the lights it would be a vast from HOA, intersections all the way to Twin Eagles at a minimum, but as the new school and improvement... it is the back up at friend, developments are built it really needs to continue out to Oil Well Rd.... maybe an the lights that cause horrible Do Every Every Year -Round neighbor, extension or over pass for Bonita Beach Rd or an exit/entrance road on Vanderbilt 12551862562 4/6/21 Yes traffic even at 6:30 AM it ... PLEASE Jday Every day Every day Every day Jday No No lResident etc.... Beach Rd and 75. Seasonal Direct Resident notification Anything to help the flow on Immokalee, (temporary from HOA, So yes we are in favor. Also desperate At least At least At least residence at friend, Glad to see that there is progress being studied for a better flow on Immokalee. But need for a Heritage Greens traffic light at Every once a once a once a least 1 month neighbor, we also desperately need a light by heritage greens. We risk our lives getting in and 12551800530 4/6/21 our entrance. IYes IYes please do it! I Jday 1week 1week lEveryday 1week IYes INo I per year) etc.... lout of HG Respondent Start Date Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question Question 5 Question Question Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 a. b. C. d. ID 4 6 7 Direct Where will the overpass begin on notification Livingston? How does this impact from HOA, Livingston Lakes access exit onto At least At least At least At least friend, Livingston? Will the u-turn at the Traffic backup at the Sarasota once a once a once a once a Year -Round neighbor, 12551798454 4/6/21 intersection remain? Yes interchange is horrendous. week Every day week imonth week Yes IYes Resident etc.... help getting into Logan Landings and the flow thru this intersection. This would really help when the High School and Elementary school gets out at 3 and 4PM. A light at Saturnia Lakes would break up the traffic and allow people get out of the This will help, but the way back communities original plan to clover leaf. East at Saturnia This area is at the end of the actual bound traffic on Immokalee at 75 and problem. It is farther East on Immokalee. going North would not needed a Heritage The actual issue is from all the traffic East of Collier Blvd. Most of the traffic issues Valewood, Tarpon Bay, 75 and the Strand left turn to get on 75, This would Greens. It is now and the future is to divert some of the traffic East on Collier Blvd off of Blvd. This backs up at times all the way to eliminate a lot of issues getting impossible Immokalee. Extending collier would help. With Founders Square opening soon it Collier Blvd. This gets worse when the on 75. There is still room to do to get out of Every Every Year -Round Email will only make this situation on Immokalee worse. It was mentioned that it will be 12551779149 4/6/21 schools let out at 3 and 4 PM. Yes Ithis. The cost may be a issue. these day Every day Everyday lEveryday day Yes INo Resident notification grid lock by 2040 it will be as early as 2030. Seasonal Resident (temporary At least At least At least At least At least residence at In support once a once a once a once a once a least 1 month The intersection is busy now and will get worse as the study indicates. I support the 12551656737 4/6/21 Immokalee backs up here too. Yes I support the proposal. of proposal. week week week 1week week No INo per year) Social media initiatives. Direct notification from HOA, At least friend, Every once a Year -Round neighbor, 12551645246 4/6/211 Yes day lEvery day lEveryday I 1week IYes INo lResident etc.... Respondent Question Question 5 Question Question Start Date Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 a. b. C. d. ID 4 6 7 They should address coming out of Livingston Lakes and being able to make a Direct left into a merging lane onto Livingston notification southbound...... we should not have to go from HOA, to the light and make a U-turn....... looks At least At least At least friend, The fact that they are doing a traffic study after approving, Seed to Table, Lexus like we are turning Collier County into Every once a once a once a Year -Round neighbor, dealership and pending low income housing next to the dealership is 12551635338 4/6/21 Miami/Ft Lauderdale with the overpasses Yes day Every day week week week Yes No IResident etc.... ridiculous ..... maybe we need to work the other way around. Too late! Direct notification from HOA, At least Less than friend, Anything to relieve this traffic Every once a once a Every Year -Round neighbor, 1255162744414/6/21 Yes congestion! day Every day week Imonth day Yes INo Resident etc.... Seasonal Resident (temporary My concern is continued growth. The area east of that area is growing rapidly and At least At least residence at feeds into the Logan area. Specifically the congested area at the intersection of Anything that has been studied and can Every once a once a least 1 month Collier and Immokolee. The construction is going to have a huge impact further 12551571272 4/6/21 help. No day Every day week Every day month No INo per year) Social media west. Direct notification from HOA, At least At least friend, Every once a once a Every Year -Round neighbor, 12551474103 4/6/21 Not sure why it is necessary. No day Every day month Iweek day Yes INo Resident etc.... our nice suburban neighborhoo ds will be ruined by all At least At least At least At least At least We are starting to look like Ft. Lauderdale Too complicated and overdone these road once a once a once a once a once a Year -Round 12551447699 4/6/21 traffic. Leave the roads alone. No for a suburban area lanes week Iweek week week Iweek No No IResident Social media While this project will improve traffic movement it will severely affect my quality of life. I live in Carlton Lakes directly adjacent to the project. Seasonal Direct Construction activities will be dissruptive, Resident notification annoying and unsafe for residients. (temporary from HOA, Rather that undertake this hugh capital At least At least At least residence at friend, costs would it not be better to limit Every once a once a once a least 1 month neighbor, 12551405027 4/6/211 residential growth along the corridor? I I I Iday lEveryday 1week 1week 1week IYes IYes I per year) etc.... Respondent Start Date Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question Question 5 Question Question Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 a. b. C. d. ID 4 6 7 Seasonal Resident (temporary At least At least At least residence at Every once a once a once a least 1 month Email 12551394240 4/6/21 Yes Iday Every day week 1week week Yes INo per year) notification anything to help the traffic flow better, gets very congested. Keeping traffic flowing with Not sure how they work, but if it minimal can keep traffic flowing more delays is Every Every Year -Round 12551084203 4/6/21 1 think this is a good idea. No Ifreely I'm for this. important. day Every day Everyday lEveryday day No INo Resident Social media Direct notification from HOA, friend, Computerize signal lights on Immokalee Isn't there one on Golden Gate Every Every Year -Round neighbor, Something MUST be done H Especially with all the new communities. malls and 12551043344 4/6/21 road to improve traffic flow. Yes Pkwy and Airport Road? Jday Every day Every day Everyday Jday No No lResident etc.... construction coming to this area!! Direct notification from HOA, friend, Every Every Year -Round neighbor, 1255063205714/6/21 No Jday Every day Every day Every day Jday Yes No lResident etc.... Less Less than than Collier Every once a once a Year -Round County 12550606864 4/6/21 Yes Too much traffic day month Every day Every day month No No Resident website Direct Coming out of Livingston Lakes notification subdivision, will we still be able to make a from HOA, U-turn at Immokalee (our only way to go At least At least At least friend, south on Livingston)? Or, will you add a once a once a once a Year -Round neighbor, 12550589789 4/6/21 light and left turn out? No 1week Every day month 1week Yes Yes I Resident etc.... The biggest need is to get more cars off Immokalee Rd by adding an interchange at At least Vanderbilt Beach Rd and by extending Collier Blvd north to Bonita Beach Rd. Also, Anything Every once a Every Year -Round Logan Blvd north of Immokalee Rd is backed up between the stop sign at Old 12550560022 4/6/21 Yes will help. day week Every day Every day day Yes No Resident Social media Cypress and Immokalee Rd recently. At least At least At least once a once a once a Every Year -Round Oakes Blvd for a residential neighborhood is more like a major roadway to cut 12550550061 4/6/21 week Every day week week day Yes No Resident Social media through. Please figure out how to turn this road back to a residential street. Respondent Question Question 5 Question Question Start Date Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 a. b. C. d. ID 4 6 7 Direct notification from HOA, At least At least At least At least At least friend, once a once a once a once a once a Year -Round neighbor, 12550503095 4/6/21 Good idea. No week week week Iweek week No INo Resident etc.... At least At least I don't Every once a once a Every Year -Round 12550468022 4/6/21 know day week month Every day day Yes No Resident Social media You need to also look at the area between Logan and Collier blvd traffic is the same or heavier than area being discussed plus you have two schools in this area which At least At least At least brings more traffic if you live in Saturni or Heritage Greens sometimes you have to Every once a once a once a Year -Round go to Collier and then to Vanderbilt in order to travel west because of traffic on 12550450561 4/6/21 Sounds like it may help No day week week Every day week Yes No Resident Social media Immokalee backed up in east and west directions Direct notification from HOA, At least At least At least At least friend, No once a once a once a once a Year -Round neighbor, 12550429401 4/6/21 1 think this is an excellent plan No comments month Every day week Imonth week Yes IYes Resident etc.... Seasonal Direct Resident notification (temporary from HOA, At least At least At least At least At least residence at friend, once a once a once a once a once a least 1 month neighbor, 12550411311 4/6/21 month Iweek week month Imonth Yes Yes per year) etc.... At least At least At least At least Better than Every once a once a once a once a Year -Round 12550392793 4/6/21 That doesn't help Immokalee Yes Yes do it nothing day week week week week Yes No Resident Social media Direct notification from HOA, At least friend, Every once a Every Year -Round neighbor, 12550352273 4/6/21 No day Every day Every day Iweek day Yes INo Resident etc.... Seasonal Resident (temporary residence at Every least 1 month 12550338981 4/6/21 Every day day Yes No per year) Social media U turn prior to the light on immokklee on Livingston Respondent Question Question 5 Question Question Start Date Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 a. b. C. d. ID 4 6 7 Seasonal Direct Resident notification (temporary from HOA, At least At least At least At least At least residence at friend, once a once a once a once a once a least 1 month neighbor, 12550324088 4/6/21 No Iweek week month Iweek month Yes IYes per year) etc.... Direct notification from HOA, Overpass should be on Immokalee with Less than At least friend, direct connect to 75. No overpass on Every once a once a Year -Round neighbor, 12550313235 4/6/21 Livingston Road day Every day month Iweek Yes INo Resident etc.... Direct notification from HOA, At least Less than At least friend, Every once a once a once a Year -Round neighbor, Immokalee road needs more lanes that will take you straight in addition to the 12550304749 4/6/21 Yes Iday Every day week Imonth week Yes INo Resident etc.... lanes that need to turn off. Seasonal Direct Resident notification Less (temporary from HOA, At least At least At least At least than residence at friend, once a once a once a once a once a least 1 month neighbor, 12550254849 4/6/21 Love it No I Makes perfect sense Makes sense month week Iweek month month IYes No per year) etc.... IGreat project when will it be completed Seasonal Resident (temporary Needed At least At least At least At least residence at especially in once a once a once a once a least 1 month Email 12550254831 4/6/21 Necessary at this time. Yes Isorely needed. season. week Every day Iweek week week Yes INo per year) notification None Seasonal Direct Resident notification (temporary from HOA, High traffic area most days! Drivers exceeding the posted speed limit on Livingston At least At least At least At least residence at friend, Rd. and Immokalee Rd. most hours of the day contribute to the danger of driving once a once a once a once a least 1 month neighbor, these roads daily. A potential overpass might be a realistic approach to traffic 12550243364 4/6/21 No Iweek Every day week Iweek week Yes INo per year) etc.... congestion in the area. Direct notification from HOA, At least friend, Every once a Every Year -Round neighbor, 12550241355 4/6/211 IYes I Iday lEveryday lEveryday Imonth Iday IYes INo IResident etc.... Respondent Question Question 5 Question Question Start Date Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 a. b. C. d. ID 4 6 7 Anything to keep traffic moving. Immokalee Rd. has become a disaster to travel since more developmen t to the East has occurred over time. This corridor is our only accessto 175 and the beachesto the west, but Sometimes these clever Immokalee We definitely need a remedy to relieve engineering feats are a Rd. can no the bottlenecking. What happened to the nightmare and look good on longer CR951 (Collier Blvd.) extension into Logan paper, but do not function well handle the to alleviate traffic from these congested or are inefficient. We need current areas going to and from 175?? We need alternate routes to get traffic off amount of to provide alternate routes to get traffic of Immokalee Rd. in addition to traffic in this Every Every Year -Round 12550238306 4/6/21 off of Immokalee Rd. in this area. No these plans. area. day Every day Every day Every day Iday No No lResident Social media Direct notification from HOA, At least At least At least At least friend, I don't once a once a once a once a Year -Round neighbor, 12550224986 4/6/21 know Imonth Every day week imonth week Yes INo Resident etc.... Direct notification from HOA, At least friend, It seems to work for Golden Gate Blvd and Every once a Every Year -Round neighbor, I sent a letter last week with recommendations for change from Valewood Dive to I- 12550217928 4/6/21 Airport Pulling Toad quite well. No Not sure Not sure day Every day Every day 1week day Yes IYes Resident etc.... 75. My name is James Gerali Direct I am concerned about the overall traffic disruption during the construction of the notification various projects. Moreover, I am highly concerned about the safety and general from HOA, ease of access into and out of the Livingston Lakes residential community. How will How would residents of Livingston Lakes Requires a conscious adjustment At least At least At least At least friend, Livingston Lakes residents exit the community and safely head South on Livingston exit the community and be able to head to navigating more typical traffic once a once a once a once a Year -Round neighbor, Road? We currently head North in Livingston and then perform an immediate left 12550193075 4/6/21 South on Livingston Rd.? IYes Iflow. INo. 1week lEveryday 1week 1week 1week IYes INo I Resident etc.... I U turn at the intersection of Livingston Rd. and Immokolee. Please advise. Respondent Question Question 5 Question Question Start Date Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 a. b. C. d. ID 4 6 7 At least At least At least I don't Every once a once a once a Year -Round Email 12550164812 4/6/21 know day Every day month month week Yes No Resident notification It will simplify the process of At least At least At least Collier If Collier County is serious about easing traffic, then the planning board must stop Expensive option to ease traffic moving vehicles thru the once a once a once a Year -Round County approving new building projects along Livingston Rd. and Immokalee Rd. No new 12550138299 4/6/21 congestion. Yes interchange. week Every day week week Yes No Resident website Car Dealership is required, nor Apartments which will only add to the problem. Direct notification from HOA, At least friend, Every once a Every Year -Round neighbor, 12550127806 4/6/21 No day Every day week Every day day No INo Resident etc.... Direct notification Less from HOA, than Less than Less than At least friend, once a once a once a once a Year -Round neighbor, 1255011480414/6/21 Yes month Every day month imonth week Yes INo Resident etc.... Collier Every Every Year -Round County 12549924423 4/6/21 day Every day Every day Every day day Yes Yes Resident website Seasonal Resident (temporary At least Less than residence at Every once a once a Every least 1 month 12549847053 4/6/21 Yes Iday Every day month imonth day Yes INo per year) Social media Not sure this is needed just yet, but it would be This design seems to work very nice to well in Atlanta to relieve proactive vs congestion wherever it has been wait until implemented. Drivers down here it's a might be very confused at first problem to Every Every Year -Round 12549707658 4/6/21 Not a bad idea Yes though address it day Every day Every day Every day day Yes Yes Resident Social media Respondent Question Question 5 Question Question Start Date Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 a. b. C. d. ID 4 6 7 1 think Logan is the least problematic. Everything backs up from the slowdown at 175. Not Seasonal to say Logan Resident doesn't (temporary need At least At least Atleast Atleast residence at improvemen once a once a once a once a least 1 month Email 12549586047 4/6/21 Yes It week week week Iweek No INo per year) notification That intersection never seems to be a problem for me now, but I could see it getting more congested as time goes on. The Partial Displaced Left Turn is a great idea, This feels like one of the longest I just worry I like the overpass at Golden Gate lights in the County. This plan that older Parkway. Just curious why Immokalee sounds good in theory, but will drivers Road wouldn't be the road that got the the snowbirds really be able to wouldn't be At least At least overpass over Livingston Road instead of maneuver it without causing able to Every once a once a Every Year -Round Do not let more traffic onto Oakes Blvd. That is a neighborhood road and should 12549550470 4/6/21 the other way around. No mass chaos? figure it out. day week week lEveryday day Yes INo Resident Social media stay that way. We need more lanes exiting Immokalee onto 175N. That traffic backs up all the way past Logan during evening rush hour At least At least Help is greatly appreciated. Hoping Collier Boulevard some day extends north I don't or we need more entrance ramps Every once a once a Every Year -Round which would alleviate congestion and/or I hear that there could be a road built 12549532668 4/6/21 Anything is better than what we have now know merging into 175. 1day Iweek Iweek lEveryday Iday IYes IYes IResident ISocial media Ifrom Immokalee (town) to golden gate area which would help too. Respondent Question Question 5 Question Question Start Date Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 a. b. C. d. ID 4 6 7 Direct notification from HOA, At least At least At least At least At least friend, I don't once a once a once a once a once a Year -Round neighbor, 1254951806514/6/21 know Iweek week week 1week week Yes INo Resident etc.... YES! This is needed so badly and would help tremendously with moving the traffic. It takes way longer than it should to move through this part of town, and not just during "work" hours... it is more At least At least At least and more congested throughout the Every once a once a once a Year -Round 12549515856 4/5/21 entire day. Yes YES! Again, needed!! day Every day month 1week week Yes INo Resident Social media The problem is traffic backing up both east and westbound on I would hope this would help Immokalee, with the traffic flow for those so if this cards traveling west on would help We live in Longshore Lake, and I cannot come home before 6 or 6:30 because I am Immokalee and trying to merge keep the Direct not able to turn right onto Vanderbilt from Livingston because traffic is backed up unto 75 north. This interchange traffic from notification to Orange Blossom. I am not able to get onto Valewood even though I take the cut is at total deadlock at 5:00 and getting from HOA, thru off of Oaks because cars travling westbound are backed up trying to get unto This will help as traffic backs up in all 4 there is always an accident so backed up At least friend, the interstate and they block the intersection of Immokalee and Valewood. So we directions at peak travel hours. But it will that cards traveling north on 75 that would Every once a Every Year -Round neighbor, do not go out at 8:00 am or come home at 5:00!!!! Frustration to the extreme!!!! 12549500177 4/6/21 not solve the problem! Yes lare backed up to Vanderbilt Rd. help. day Everyday lEveryday week day IYes No Resident etc.... IThis has been a problem for at least 3 years now! At least At least At least Collier Every once a once a once a Year -Round County 12549479817 4/6/21 Yes day Every day week month week Yes No Resident website At least At least At least At least At least It seems to have increased once a once a once a once a once a Year -Round Email 12549474829 4/6/21 Yes efficiency in Sarasota county. week week week week week No No Resident notification Less than At least At least At least At least once a once a once a once a once a Year -Round 12549421476 4/5/21 Yes month week week week month No No Resident Social media I live in a community off of Valewood. I think it would be a huge mistake to have a At least At least At least dedicated left turn lane and a straight/right turn lane. Turning right on red is legal, I don't Every once a once a once a Every Year -Round but going straight is not. One car going straight would tie up a lot of traffic that 12549366736 4/5/21 know day week week week day Yes No Resident Social media could otherwise move onto Immokalee Rd. We need a dedicated right turn lane. Respondent Question Question 5 Question Question Start Date Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 a. b. C. d. ID 4 6 7 Direct notification from HOA, friend, Every Every Year -Round neighbor, 12549292228 4/5/21 Yes Iday Every day Every day Every day day Yes INo Resident etc.... Add an entrance on 175 from Vanderbilt. At least At least At least At least At least once a once a once a once a once a Year -Round 12549288911 4/5/21 No week week week week week Yes No Resident Social media At least Yes. Good idea. Also need one for Collier Every once a Every Year -Round 12549215316 4/5/21 and Immokalee. Yes day Every day month Every day day No No Resident Social media Direct notification from HOA, At least At least At least At least At least friend, once a once a once a once a once a Year -Round neighbor, The Collier Blvd/Immokalee intersection that is quickly becoming more congested 12549192057 4/5/21 1week week week 1week week No INo Resident etc.... with the building of Founders Square should also be addressed At least At least At least At least At least very good once a once a once a once a once a Year -Round 12549178945 4/5/21 great idea Yes works well idea! week week week week week No No Resident Social media looking forward to the improvements Direct I understand "season" and that it may be impossible to foresee upcoming traffic notification issues. For the people that live here year-round the gauge life according to a from HOA, Markley Boulevard... Absolutely sucks! It either takes me 15 minutes to get to work friend, for an hour and 15 minutes to get to work depending on the time a day depending Every Every Year -Round neighbor, on the time year. Any help would be greatly appreciated and any expansion is 12549149328 4/5/21 Yes I Please do it! Do ANYTHING!! Yes! Do it!! day Everyday Everyday lEveryday day No IYes Resident etc.... absolutely needed STOP At least DEVELOPING Every once a Every Year -Round 12549136838 4/5/21 STOP DEVELOPING EAST No STOP DEVELOPING EAST EAST day week Every day Every day day Yes No Resident Social media STOP DEVELOPING EAST!!! Agree with your At least recommend Every once a Year -Round 12549105655 4/5/21 Agree with your recommendations Yes None ations day Every day Every day Every day week Yes No Resident Social media Agree with your recommendations Please stop dump trucks on Logan extension At least At least At least At least At least once a once a once a once a once a Year -Round Traffic is horrible. I drive to fort myers for work at night, I'm a nurse, it takes me 12549047484 4/5/21 week week week week week Yes No Resident Social media longer to get out of Naples sometimes than to get to Ft Myers. Direct notification from HOA, It's going to confuse a lot of the At least At least At least friend, A lot of this would be unnecessary if Bonita Beach Road would be extended to drivers, especially those who are Every once a once a once a Year -Round neighbor, Immokalee Road. A good proportion of this traffic is from the town of Immokalee 12549042974 4/5/211 IYes jalready a bit confused I Jday lEveryday Imonth 1week 1week INo INo I Resident etc.... I trying to get to 75. Respondent Start. Date Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question Question 5 Question Question Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 a. b. C. d. ID 4 6 7 Seasonal Resident (temporary At least At least residence at Every once a once a Every least 1 month 12549034608 4/5/21 Yes Iday week Every day Iweek day Yes INo per year) Social media Direct notification from HOA, They are very effective in At least friend, reducing traffic in heavily Every once a Year -Round neighbor, These improvements are going to be required to accommodate the expansion of 12549025323 4/5/21 This is a worthwhile improvement. Yes Itraveled intersections. day Every day Everyday lEveryday week Yes INo Resident etc.... communities east of Collier Blvd Collier Every Every Year -Round County 12548942811 4/5/21 1 like it. Yes I like it. I like it. day Every day Every day Every day day No Yes Resident website Please do anything needed to improve immokalee rd These changes will do VERY LITTLE to reduce congestion on Immokakee Road. On top of that you are only adding MORE homes on Immokakee and Collier Road. Find a way to detour this huge influx of cars onto Bonita Road to avoid the 175 congestion ! Or build an outer belt hwy. Even if it's a toll road! Immokakee is bumper to bumper now all the way to At least At least Randell ( where more homes are going This will only be of minimal help Every once a once a Year -Round You can't clean up a huge pile of s@@t with a spoon, you need a bulldozer. We 12548874385 4/5/21 up). Smh. Yes Ito reduce traffic! day week Everyday lEveryday week No INo Resident Social media need to get on 175 in another way other than Immokakee Road. I am so glad to see the issue is being studied, the 175 interchange is the most important change I think. If that worked better I believe it would alleviate some of the issues at Logan and Livingston. At a minimum a 2 lane turn lane onto 175N on the eastern side of the interchange would be a tremendous and immediate alleviation of congestion, every other directional turn has 2 lanes except this directions which causes significant backup in the far right lane of immokalee which At least At least At least At least At least can stretch back beyond Logan Blvd. at its worst, also I witness it all the time where once a once a once a once a once a Year -Round people stay in middle lane and at last minute move over causing braking of vehicles 12548855706 4/5/21 No Iweek week week Iweek week Yes IYes Resident Social media in turn lane which then cause a domino effect of braking all the way back They have them in the Melborne area and people I have spoken with that use them are thankful Every Every Year -Round Email I would like to thank everyone for even thinking about these changes. They would 12548836015 4/5/21 No they are there day Every day Every day Every day day No No Resident notification be welcomed by everyone if it helps with the congestion Respondent Question Question 5 Question Question Start. Date Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 a. b. C. d. ID 4 6 7 1 see the issue here is after turning south on Logan, traffic in the right lane tries to turn left into the shopping center and cuts off traffic in the If you improve the flow here and left lane. We need the traffic flow to be improved not at the Livingston interchange Not sure at this intersection on Immokalee Rd. I you will have a backup to this how to At least At least At least At least At least Please look at the entire Immokalee road corridor between Randell and Airport have never seen an issue with the I don't intersection westbound at resolve that once a once a once a once a once a Year -Round Pulling. There is massive congestion during peak travel times at almost every 12548802746 4/5/21 North/South traffic on Livingston. know multiple times during the day. issue. week week week 1week week No INo Resident Social media intersection with a light. Especially at Collier Blvd. Stay focused, and there's no problem. We may need At least At least At least At least additional signage for the once a once a once a once a Every Year -Round Email 12548786921 4/5/21 Yes population that cant read. Looks good. week week week week day No No Resident notification At least At least Less than At least At least I don't once a once a once a once a once a Year -Round 12548684525 4/5/21 know week week month week week No No Resident Social media To alleviate traffic in the area being studied an extension of Collier blvd to logan extension would be a tremendous help. There would have virtually no effect on current traffic conditions during construction because it is not currently a road. This would be similar to the logan extension project but would eliminate the traffic from the developments east of Collier Blvd wishing to head north. This would also reduce Every Every Year -Round the amount of traffic passing by Gulf Coast High School and Laurel Oak Elementary 12548678279 4/5/21 day Every day Every day Every day day No INo Resident Social media School which would be a safer environment for the students. Less At least At least At least At least than once a once a once a once a once a Year -Round 12548673452 4/5/21 No week week month week month No No Resident Social media Every Every Year -Round 12548660196 4/5/21 Yes day Every day Every day Every day day No No Resident Social media Seasonal Resident (temporary At least At least At least At least At least residence at I am shocked that the development along Immokalee rd. continues... adding once a once a once a once a once a least 1 month numerous new developments and multi family complexes... many approved long 12548658987 4/5/21 Yes week week week week week No No per year) Social media before this traffic issue is solved. Respondent Question Question 5 Question Question Start Date Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 a. b. C. d. ID 4 6 7 At least At least At least At least At least once a once a once a once a once a Year -Round 12548638408 4/5/21 No week week week week week No No Resident Social media At least At least Every once a once a Every Year -Round 12548632892 4/5/21 Yes day week month Every day day No No Resident Social media This helps with traffic flow but also The traffic congestion due to increased building on Valewood Blvd needs to be increases At least looked at as well. It takes forever to get on to Immokalee Rd and accidents have risk of Every once a Every Year -Round increased on Valewood and the professional center road merging at the 12548572913 4/5/21 I think this is needed for sure. No accidents. day Every day week Every day day Yes INo Resident Social media intersection of these two roads just before Immokalee Rd. the left turn needs to be longer in all directions, keep the big trucks off of logan going north of Immokalee - - they get everything backed up from the stop sign on loganinto the intersection at immokalee. Also, the light on logan needs to be green Direct longer for notification traffic from HOA, crossing At least At least At least friend, I take logan to Vanderbilt to avoid Immokalee because it is so congested. I work off both north Every once a once a once a Year -Round neighbor, of 41 and it would be easier to go straight down Immokalee but it can add up to 20 12548555738 4/5/21 No Iand south. day week week Every day week Yes INo Resident etc.... minutes to my commute. Ironic how the County & BOCC keeps approving developments east of 1-75 along Immokalee Road without having a true N/S alternative besides 1-75. You know the road has failed, yet you continue to approve significant residential developments Yes, along this corridor. CR 951 needs to be extended north to SWFL International These DDI seem to be effective, improvemen Airport to allow residents to the east of Logan Blvd. to access this area without This would be beneficial to keep traffic but not enough experience to t would be Every Every Year -Round Email utilizing 1-75. STOP approving new developments until the study area is improved 12548463272 4/5/21 flowing N&S with little interruption. IYes I provide a definitive decision. Igreat Jday lEveryday lEveryday lEveryday day IYes INo I Resident notification and a acceptable N/S alternative is completed. Respondent Start Date Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question Question 5 Question Question Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 a. b. C. d. ID 4 6 7 No need for overpass to have Livingston "fly over" Immokalee Road. Livingston Road traffic is not the issue, Immokalee Do it and the above. Improve Road traffic is. Focus on improving traffic signal timing of the Eastbound flow East of Livingston on Immokalee and Westbound signals at The Road; especially signal timing of the signal Strand and Juliet Lane, that is a at The Strand and Juliet Lane, that is a major tie up. Also, improve the major tie up. Also, improve the Southbound exit from The Strand At least At least At least At least At least Southbound exit from The Strand to have to have a dedicated Westbound once a once a once a once a once a Year -Round Do work from 10pm -6am to avoid impacting peak hours traffic; unlike the work 12548457270 4/5/21 a dedicated Westbound (right) turn lane Yes (right) turn lane no week week 1week month week Yes INo Resident Social media that was recently performed on Immokalee Road Once you drive you love it. It is easy to drive and move through Every Every Year -Round 12548399649 4/5/21 No, other than we need to do something Yes the interchange day Every day Every day Every day day No No Resident Social media At least At least At least At least At least This would be a mess but most feasible once a once a once a once a once a Year -Round 12548379009 4/5/21 option week week week month week No No Resident Social media At least Every once a Year -Round Email 12548352240 4/5/21 Yes day Every day Every day Every day month No Yes Resident notification Additional light at Logan These can be really confusing. I Landing At least At least At least Seed to Table made a real mess of this I don't wonder how elderly and seasonal entrance Every once a once a once a Year -Round Glad to see you looking at this section. Traffic is just awful and getting worse each 12547887864 4/5/21 intersection. Overpass makes sense. know drivers will fare. should help. day week week Every day week No INo Resident Social media year. This year during the high season it was consistently congested and dangerous. Even when listening to the video, I don't think it is really clear what is going to be done in some of the areas. The video had an echo to it. I think the drawings could be more clearer. We are happy you are looking to solve the issues with the traffic as it is terrible unless we leave really early or late. Thank you for asking the questions. We really need Valewood to be looked at as it may take several lights to get out of the intersection. Many times it is because the trucks and cars on Immokalee block the intersection when we have the green light. Then the crawl down Immokalee and many times not one car gets out going right off Valewood to I don't Every Every Year -Round Email Immokalee. One time I sat through 3 lights before any car got off Valewood. I was 12547740432 4/5/21 1 like this. know Not exactly sure what this is. day Every day Everyday lEveryday day Yes INo Resident notification the 5th car and it took me 7 lights to turn right. At least Every once a Every Year -Round 12547592492 4/5/21 No day week Every day Every day day No No Resident Social media Direct notification Less from HOA, This is definitely needed as traffic backs Definitely needed to alleviate the than At least At least friend, up at this intersection and drivers illegally traffic jams at Immokalee and 175 once a once a once a Year -Round neighbor, With the increasing growth these measures are desperately needed to correct 12547427322 4/4/21 block the box tripling the driving time. Yes and Livingston and Immokalee none month Every day week week Yes No Resident etc.... and/or prevent congestion. Respondent Question Question 5 Question Question Start Date Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 a. b. C. d. ID 4 6 7 Direct notification from HOA, At least At least At least friend, Like this idea, if it is similar to Golden We need a solution to this area Every once a once a once a Year -Round neighbor, 12546447798 4/4/21 Gate Parkway overpass on Airport Rd No of congestion day Every day week imonth week Yes INo Resident etc.... Stop the construction until you have the congestion figured out Less At least At least At least At least than once a once a once a once a once a Year -Round Email 12546246821 4/3/21 No week week week week month No No Resident notification Less What will be the height of the overpass. than Less than Less than Residents of CL will be violently opposed I have used several locations in once a once a once a Every Year -Round Email We need better traffic control on Immokalee. What about another 175 interchange 12546178461 4/3/21 to anything that they can see or hear. Yes Ohio. It works very well. month Every day month month day Yes Yes Resident notification at Vanderbilt? Direct notification from HOA, At least friend, There are many speeders and cars with loud mufflers racing up and down in the Every once a Year -Round neighbor, evening. Suggest give some tickets to discourage them. Why not also add an exit off 1254518382914/3/21 day Every day week Every day Yes INo Resident etc.... Vanderbilt Road from 75? Stop the over building in this area. Looks dangerous. Why don't you build an Immokalee expressway from Livingston to Logan that runs above the current roadway. Don't Also please consider moving forward the 951 and Immokalee intersection project. That way vehicles not going to understand Too much traffic. Too many accidents and in another year Founders Square will Target, Walmart , the Strand or I- how this At least At least Collier open making matters worse. Perhaps we need a connector / bypass highway Sounds good. We need this now. Don't 75 can sail past these exits rather improves Every once a once a Year -Round County connecting 175 at Davis running through Golden Gate Estates and reconnecting to 12545117519 4/3/21 delay this project any further. No Ithan wait in traffic for ages. the situation day Every day week Every day week No INo Resident website 175 at Bonita Beach Rd or further North. Direct notification from HOA, At least At least friend, Traffic flow will definitely be Every once a once a Every Year -Round neighbor, 12545086647 4/3/21 Good solution to decongest . Yes Ienhanced by this exchange day week Every day 1week day Yes IYes Resident etc.... It is time to decongest Immokalee Road. At least At least At least At least I don't Every once a once a once a once a Year -Round 12544641564 4/2/21 know day week week week week No No Resident Social media Respondent Start Date Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question Question 5 Question Question Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 a. b. C. d. ID 4 6 7 Good option for congestion relief with the thru flow of Immokalee but without the expansion of the canal bridges just north of this intersection and the construction of a dual merge lane onto NB 175 the back ups along the far north WB lane of Immokalee will not see any relief. The demand for After driver NB 175 access causes traffic in acceptance the far right lane of WB and with Immokalee to frequently back up very clear beyond Palazzo Drive. The lane addition of the combination markings, Direct Question why three EB Immokalee turn turn/thru lane along the north appears to notification lanes from SB Livingston would be side of Immokalee will help with be a viable from HOA, preferable to having two and a single SB WB thru traffic along Immokalee option for At least At least friend, Some aspects of the congestion relief efforts such as the additional WB Immokalee Livingston thru lane similar to the single but the juggling for position to congestion Every once a once a Every Year -Round neighbor, thru/turn lane appear to involve little repaving and could be implemented with lane 12543280793 4/2/21 NB Livingston thru lane. Yes laccess NB 175 will not change. relief. day week Every day Iweek day Yes INo Resident etc.... restripping. You should be addressing alternative traffic solutions or routes further East starting at oil well road. We Direct need a notification bypass or from HOA, Make sure it is well marked, they flyover friend, can be a bit confusing. Old folks straight to I- Every Every Year -Round neighbor, Glad it is being done but it is 5 years late. County commission allowed unbridled 12543152774 4/2/21 Yes Idown here may create issues. 75 day Every day Everyday lEveryday day Yes INo Resident etc.... growth with no infrastructure. Seasonal Resident (temporary At least At least residence at Every once a once a least 1 month 12542569321 4/2/21 No day week Every day Every day month Yes No per year) Social media Respondent Start Date Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question Question 5 Question Question Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 a. b. C. d. ID 4 6 7 Dumbest idea ever thought of and executed. Traffic is horrible, more accidents, more confused drivers who stop causing many Have not accidents. Impossible to navigate experienced Horrible idea for a few hours of the day in the rain or the holiday season. one but for traffic. Time the lights. You are only Add in the 2-3 years of nothing is moving the traffic down to next light at construction making more traffic continuous. Vanderbilt. The Golden Gate flyover problems. Not sure why they Traffic Direct Lets use some common sense here. Just re -time the lights to handle the flow in or wasn't needed back then or now. You continued with others. My stopped on notification out. You can't have an extended light say at Livingston and a shorter one east only moved the traffic to another light daughter lives and works in Immokalee from HOA, bound at Juliet receiving the traffic. All lights need to sync up allowing continual east or west bound. It was a waste of Sarasota. Every patient that will halt any At least friend, flow. People need to realize that Naples is not a sleepy little town anymore. Traffic money. I use it everyday, doesn't save comes in late into her office continuous Every once a Every Year -Round neighbor, will continue, no different than Miami or Orlando or other cities and towns north or 12542453306 4/1/21 anytime. Yes 1complains about the traffic. flow onto it. day Everyday lEveryday week day IYes No Resident etc.... west of us. Every Every Year -Round 12542342492 4/1/21 Yes day Every day Every day Every day day No No Resident Social media Enough is enough- no more developments At least Every once a Every Year -Round Email I applaud Collier County for having the vison to propose the changes. Collier County 12542260694 4/1/21 Yes I like it! day week Every day Every day day Yes Yes Resident notification has been very progressive in their urban traffic planning efforts. Thank you. Direct notification from HOA, At least friend, I don't Every once a Every Year -Round neighbor, 12541256500 4/1/21 know IGood idea day Every day Every day 1week day Yes INo Resident etc.... This looks confusing and I worry about the elderly population , which will include me by the time this is done, Seasonal Direct understandi Resident notification ng and (temporary from HOA, Necessary because of the tremendous amount of traffic, particularly during season. Probably a good solution, but I worry Confusing at first but if you go navigating At least At least At least residence at friend, Please keep pedestrians and bicyclists in mind in any design. I use the bike trail about the impact on traffic for the with the flow, traffic seems to this kind of Every once a once a once a Every least 1 month neighbor, along the canal nearly every day and its straight, free flow has already been 12540255713 4/1/21 considerable time it will take to build this. Yes Imove well. intersection. day week week 1week day Yes INo per year) etc.... interrupted at Logan Boulevard and Collier Boulevard. At least At least At least Less than At least once a once a once a once a once a Year -Round 12540124941 4/1/21 No month month month month month No No Resident Social media Respondent Question Question 5 Question Question Start Date Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 a. b. C. d. ID 4 6 7 Not sure what the access management At least At least At least At least alternative would do to theCarlton Lakes Driven through one in St. Louis. once a once a once a once a Year -Round 12540111658 4/1/21 Development entrance and exit. Yes It works well month Every day month month week Yes No Resident Social media At least At least At least Every once a once a once a Year -Round 12540090778 4/1/21 Yes day week Every day week week Yes No Resident Social media I'm not in a position to dispute the wisdom of creating a Diverging Diamond Interchange, but frankly I'm very confused by Less it. Perhaps consider educating At least At least At least At least than Collier the public on how and why this once a once a once a once a once a Year -Round County 12539926894 4/1/211 No works? week 1week month week imonth Yes No lResident website Direct notification from HOA, Given the circumstances of the pandemic, a shortened season and many business At least At least At least friend, closures and restrictions, this survey may not be a true representation of traffic once a once a once a Every Year -Round neighbor, flows in this area, at this time ie., I used to travel Logan Blvd more frequently before 12539704259 4/1/21 No week Every day week 1week day Yes INo Resident etc.... the pandemic to get to work.Now its is only about once a week. At least At least I don't Every once a once a Every Year -Round Email 12539598404 4/1/21 know day Every day week week day Yes No Resident notification Looking forward to the improvements Direct notification from HOA, At least At least At least At least At least friend, once a once a once a once a once a Year -Round neighbor, 12539425184 4/1/21 No Iweek week week 1week week Yes INo Resident etc.... This just seems like an accident waiting to Every Every Year -Round 12539363497 4/1/21 No happen..... day Every day Every day day No No Resident Social media Good job waiting so long to do this. Perhaps this should have been done when you Direct were authorizing all of the new developments. How about studying putting an notification east/west road somewhere between Immokalee and Vanderbilt. It is pretty bad Make Logan from HOA, that the goal is to get to a "E" level state of traffic. Most times the roads are 2 lanes At least friend, already at an "I"' level. By the time all of this gets done, it will be out of date. You north and Every once a Every Year -Round neighbor, need to a more comprehensive study of how to add more roads and less 12539273955 3/31/21 No Isouth. day week Everyday lEveryday day Yes INo Resident etc.... development. Executive drive and Valewwod drive have had at least 6 accidents since 2020 Direct Thanksgiving. I live in longshore lake it is very dangerous when approaching notification executive drive cars back up trying to exit to immokalee rd. Unfortunately folks do from HOA, not use the exit by the Mobil station. The executive valewood cut through is very Need more lanes when on 75 friend, similar to the one that existed in the strand which was closed a few years ago. The exiting exit 111. Traffice backs up Every Every Year -Round neighbor, valewwod cut through is used for u turns at times executive and valewood are 12539186230 3/31/211 INo Ion 75. 1 Jday lEveryday lEveryday lEveryday Jday IYes INo lResident etc.... Iliterally backed up to Palazzo. Respondent Start Date Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question Question 5 Question Question Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 a. b. C. d. ID 4 6 7 Direct notification from HOA, At least At least friend, Would NOT like to see an overpass. Takes Every once a once a Every Year -Round neighbor, 12539141007 3/31/21 away from the beauty of the area. Yes day Every day week 1week day Yes INo Resident etc.... Direct notification from HOA, Yes..... 951 needs to be built northward!!! Development east of 951 cannot be friend, funneled west to i75 in order to go northbound. I understand the environmental Every Year -Round neighbor, concerns. If we can buold bridges to connect the florida keys, that technology 12539119053 3/31/21 Every day Everyday lEveryday day Yes INo Resident etc.... could be utilized for 951 northbound. Direct Given the ... ahem ... notification One thing that could immediately help with congestion is actively enforcing the "do demographic of the average from HOA, not block intersection" signs - especially at Valewood/Oakes and Immokalee. It is a Naples resident, I worry that this At least At least At least friend, common sight to see that intersection completely blocked, and Collier County might be too confusing and Every once a once a once a Every Year -Round neighbor, Sheriff cars driving by without doing anything. If people started understanding that 12539071389 3/31/21 This makes a good deal of sense. No 1complex. day week week 1week day Yes IYes Resident etc.... gridlock is a ticketable offense, perhaps they will obey the signage. Seasonal Resident (temporary At least At least residence at Something has to be done... quickly! Traffic on Imokkolee Rd is horrible. I live in Every once a once a least 1 month Heritage Bay on Imokkolee Rd. Can't get out or into my development without 12538884044 3/31/21 day Every day week Every day week No INo per year) Social media risking my life!!! 3 1/2 Miles to RT 75 can take 20-30 minutes in traffic.... crazy! Direct notification from HOA, I used to live on Lakewood ranch At least At least At least friend, and have seen how well this Every once a once a once a Year -Round neighbor, 12538877069 3/31/21 Concur Yes 1works. Concur day week week Every day week Yes INo Resident etc.... In favor of improvements suggested. This intersection was so poorly I think more needs to be done for traffic planned. It's on Immokalee. It's a parking lot even in brand new the middle of the day from Livingston to and already Every Every Year -Round 12538790546 3/31/21 Oaks Blvd. Yes Might be confusing to some. too small. day Everyday Everyday lEveryday day Yes INo Resident Social media How fast Interesting concept. Speed may have to How fast can this get done? can this get be reduced significantly until people get Sooner is always better. done? Less the hang of it. Jersey walls may help. How Construction would have to take Sooner is At least than Collier Build these sooner than 2040. I'll probably be dead by then and it won't matter. fast can this get done? Sooner is always place 24-7 to get this done. I like always Every once a once a Year -Round County But, the amount of, and density of construction on Immokalee is stunning. We need 12538535257 3/31/21 better. No it though. better. day Every day week Every day month No No Resident website road improvement as soon as possible. Thank you. Respondent Start Date Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question Question 5 Question Question Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 a. b. C. d. ID 4 6 7 Direct notification from HOA, At least friend, Every once a Year -Round neighbor, 12538502723 3/31/21 day Every day Everyday lEveryday month Yes INo Resident etc.... Congestion and speeding on Logan is a concern. address the issue of volume on Immokalee Road. With all the proposed developmen t in the eastern part of the county, this will not solve any issues. Most of the Traffic on Immokalee Road is ridiculous now, and adding the Rural Lands projects traffic from will make it worse. Collier Blvd should extend to Bonita Beach Road to divert some the east is of the northbound traffic. More East/West corridors are needed to take traffic off headed for of Immokalee Road, Developers need to take responsibility for their impact on the 175 or the infrastructure and pay for improvements up front, not after their developments are US 41 area, done and they find a way to wiggle out of the agreements or put in substandard not Bonita roads, like Logan Blvd north of Immokalee Rd. Place a moratorium on development Beach Road. until a regional solution is found, not this band -aid approach to problems created How will this help congestion on Logan Blvd by those developments. Based on the Logan Blvd traffic studies, I can say without Immokalee Road? Many issues are due to north of reservation that whomever conducted the studies has an agenda that is not in the traffic coming out of Seed to Table and Immokalee best interest of residents but instead favors trucking companies that are tearing up crossing all lanes on WB Immokalee Road Road is a a road not designed for their weight or with safety/ access for emergency vehicles to make a left onto Livingston. I don't see single lane in mind. Notifying trucking companies that the road will be monitored is so absurd how a flyover would be accessed . Seems like an expensive project road - why At least At least At least At least it's laughable. Commissioners with a vested interest in the trucking companies Someone wasn't thinking when they does the traffic volume warrant does what is once a once a once a once a Year -Round must recuse themselves and be removed from any and all discussions of the 12538391120 3/31/21 approved StT. No it? essentially a week week month Every day week Yes INo Resident Social media problems. Keep the trucks and 175, and charge impact fees for using county roads. Direct notification from HOA, At least At least friend, Do not see benefits of this and Every once a once a Year -Round neighbor, 12538204680 3/31/21 IYes Ithink it's confusing day week Every day Every day week Yes No Resident etc.... Expand Logan north to Bonita Beach Road Every IEveryday lEveryday lEveryday Every INo Year -Round 12538125007 3/31/21 Yes Would be Better than it is now! day day Yes Resident Social media Something needs to be done and done quickly!!! Respondent Question Question 5 Question Question Start Date Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 a. b. C. d. ID 4 6 7 Direct notification from HOA, At least friend, Every once a Year -Round neighbor, 12537214451 3/31/21 day Every day Every day Every day week No INo Resident etc.... Every Every Year -Round 12537036714 3/31/21 N/A Yes day Every day Every day Every day day Yes Yes Resident Social media At least At least At least At least Collier once a once a once a once a Year -Round County 12536931873 3/31/21 Yes week week week week No No Resident website Both ideas are great. Please go for them! At least At least Every once a once a Every Year -Round 12536866650 3/31/21 Yes day Every day week week day Yes No Resident Social media At least At least Every once a once a Every Year -Round Email Stop the excessive development and subsequent population growth turning 12536201661 3/31/21 Bike lane must be improved and be safe No Looks confusing. Is it safe? None day Every day week month day Yes No Resident notification Naples into Miami West. Seasonal Resident (temporary At least At least At least At least At least residence at once a once a once a once a once a least 1 month 12536014540 3/31/21 No No week month week Iweek month No INo per year) Social media At least At least At least At least At least Anything that will speed up the once a once a once a once a once a Year -Round 12535782713 3/30/21 No traffic flow is good! week week week month week Yes No Resident Social media Please do something as it's getting out of control. Seasonal Resident (temporary Good recommendation. Would be as At least At least residence at successful as Golden Gate/Airport Would significantly help once a once a Every least 1 month Email 12535743866 3/30/21 overpass. Yes Icongestion at this interchange. Should help. week Every day Every day Iweek day Yes INo per year) notification No Seasonal Direct Resident notification (temporary from HOA, At least residence at friend, This is very necessary to relieve existing This approach works very well. I Every once a Every least 1 month neighbor, The traffic congestion is very serious. Please proceed with these needed 12535671541 3/30/21 congestion Yes Irecommend it day Every day I Every day week day Yes No per year) etc.... improvements At least At least At least At least At least doesn't appear to offer much once a once a once a once a once a Year -Round 12535486456 3/30/21 Yes relief week week week week week No No Resident Social media At least At least At least At least At least once a once a once a once a once a Year -Round 12535164028 3/30/21 No week week week week week Yes No Resident Social media Respondent Start Date Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question Question 5 Question Question Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 a. b. C. d. ID 4 6 7 At least At least Love this idea! Not confusing for people Every once a once a Year -Round 12535086163 3/30/21 to follow Yes To confusing for seniors day Every day week Every day week No Yes Resident Social media Change speed limit on Logan to 45 mph both north and south of IMMOKALEE . Extend right turn only lanes around the entire intersection. Prohibit ALL commercial truck traffic on Logan north Remove stop signs at Olde Complete Collier Blvd NORTH of Immokalee up to Bonita Beach Road immediately. Cypress Every Year -Round Who thought making a dangerous U-turn north on the CVS/NCH on Collier Blvd was 12535013425 3/30/21 intersection day Yes INo Resident Social media a good idea? IDIOTS! Anything to improve traffic flow. It's very hard to turn left out of Logan landings Less shopping Less than than Collier I don't area right Every once a once a Year -Round County 12534959754 3/30/21 know onto Logan day month Everyday lEveryday month Yes INo Resident website As a biker, I worry about Logan Road. I am very much in Every Every Year -Round Anything today can be done to improve the flow would be great. They may look 12533643690 3/30/21 I am very much in favor of it. Yes I am very much in favor of it. favor of it. day Every day Every day Every day day No No Resident Social media confusing on paper to some, but they are simple to navigate when driving. These are very dangerous intersections. People cant even At least At least At least The backup is 175. You need to add a exit and entrance ramp north and south at turn without going the wrong Every once a once a once a Every Year -Round Vanderbilt Rd. This will ease traffic off of Immoklee. Also need housing moratorium 12533342988 3/30/21 Yes way. day week week week day Yes No Resident Social media east of 175. Respondent Question Question 5 Question Question Start Date Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 a. b. C. d. ID 4 6 7 Direct notification from HOA, At least At least friend, Every once a once a Year -Round neighbor, 12533335272 3/30/21 No No INo No day Every day week I Every day week Yes INo Resident etc.... No At least At least At least At least At least once a once a once a once a once a Year -Round 12532626329 3/29/21 No week week week week week Yes No Resident In Germany, if you go through a green light and adhere to the speed limit you will be able to know all light thereafter If this facilitates through traffic At least At least Collier In Germany, if you go through a green light and adhere to the speed limit you will will be green when you arrive. Consider (i.e. traffic not accessing 1-75) 1 Every once a once a Every Year -Round County be able to know all light thereafter will be green when you arrive. Consider light 12532445120 3/29/21 light sequencing as a first step now. No am for it. day week week Every day day Yes No Resident website sequencing on Immokalee as a first step now. looks like the one on daniels parkway andsr82 At least At least At least At least that works once a once a once a once a Year -Round 12532366682 3/29/21 No Igreat. week week 1week month No INo Resident get it done soon! Seasonal Direct Resident notification (temporary from HOA, At least residence at friend, Something definitely needs to be done ... I live off of Immokalee Road and its a I don't Every once a least 1 month neighbor, nightmare trying to drive on it (especially trying to pull out of our community). 12531733658 3/29/21 know day Every day Everyday lEveryday week Yes INo per year) etc.... Thank you for all your work on this. Traffic only heavier in season nit warranting an overpass which will cause At least At least more traffic noise above all condos in this Every once a once a Every Year -Round 12531688100 3/29/21 intersection so NOT IN FAVOR,!! Yes Not in favor Not in favor day Every day month week day Yes Yes Resident Social media Not in favor Direct notification from HOA, This study is very much needed, thank you. Something also needs to be done about friend, the noise from speeding and modified mufflers. Living off Immokalee Rd and close Every Every Year -Round neighbor, to Collier intersection has truly become a nightmare. We are considering selling our 12531577249 3/29/21 No Jday Every day Everyday lEveryday day Yes INo Resident etc.... house that we love. Direct notification from HOA, friend, Every Every Year -Round neighbor, 12531575993 3/29/21 Yes day Every day Every day Every day day Yes No Resident etc.... Respondent Start Date Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question Question 5 Question Question Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 a. b. C. d. ID 4 6 7 At least At least Collier Get the lights timed so traffic can make it Every once a once a Year -Round County 12531321154 3/29/21 through more than 1 light at a time No day Every day week Every day month No Yes Resident website Direct notification This would keep traffic moving on from HOA, Livingston better. Not sure how this At least Less than friend, would help Immokalee Rd traffic which Need a lot of clear signage and Every once a once a Every Year -Round neighbor, Something needs to be done about the traffic, especially as more and more homes 12530769284 3/29/21 seems to be the bigger problem. No educating drivers! day Every day 1week month day IYes Yes Resident etc.... and commercial space is developed along Immokalee. Seasonal Direct Resident notification (temporary from HOA, At least At least At least At least residence at friend, once a once a once a once a least 1 month neighbor, 12530755763 3/29/21 week week week Every day month Yes INo per year) etc.... Do not fully At least Excellent idea. Should work well at this understand Every once a Every Year -Round 12530740643 3/29/21 location. No Do not fully understand concept concept day Every day week Every day day No No Resident More info is needed to determine usability Collier Every Every Year -Round County 12530699995 3/29/21 Yes day Every day Every day Every day day Yes Yes Resident website The main problem is not N/S travel. It is traffic turning to get on I-75, especially from Livingston travel heading N. That intersection has a dangerous flow related Direct to traffic leaving Seed to Table that notification crosses 5 lanes of traffic so they can make from HOA, a U turn at Livingston to head E. An At least At least friend, Growth has been poorly managed. Zoning laws have been ignored. Now we have a overpass is overkill. What an eyesore this DDI's can be very confusing, and Every once a once a Every Year -Round neighbor, concrete jungle. We are losing our trees, our birds and animals, and our local 12530589597 3/29/21 area will become! Yes result in delays. day Every day 1week month day Yes INo Resident etc.... charm. Sad. I strongly opposed the Immokalee overpass! At least Every once a Every Year -Round 12530588988 3/29/21 Agree. Yes Disagree. Agree. day Every day Every day week day No No Resident Social media Respondent Question Question 5 Question Question Start. Date Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 a. b. C. d. ID 4 6 7 never thoughtthe Logan Immokalee intersection was that bad. It the Traffic Commission more than 12 years to get traffic light for the North Naples substation on the South side of Immokalee. I recently moved upstairs after living in That definily Naples fror 18 years. I see one of the helped the Stop the construction in Naples. It is clear the widening of Immokalee Rd in 2006 craziest intersection is the Immokalee respons and the widening of Collier Blvd were never widened enough to handle the outvof /collier Blvd. It has to be one one ofvthe time of the control construction. Not only does the construction put demands on traffic , the busiest in South Florida. There are srip engine and ecosystem where some Florida's ordinal denizens used to live, black bears, snakes, malls on both the North a nd South side ambulance At least At least At least At least At least Collier alligators are beautiful shore boards. They are moving into gated communities and of Immokalee Rd. The traffic light system stationed once a once a once a once a once a Year -Round County disrupting the lives of its human residents. Its putting huge demands on water and 12530573901 3/29/21 is dizzying. Yes there. week 1week week week month Yes No lResident website the power grid. Greed will destroyvthe beauty of one Florida's best loved cities. Overpass would be great, keep traffic I'll try anything to alleviate traffic, Collier moving and give drivers accessibility to I don't I avoid this intersection by any Looks Every Every Year -Round County 12530546185 3/29/21 get on immokalee if they need it know means necessary confusing! day Every day Every day Every day day Yes No Resident website Thank you for your efforts Turning left (southbound) into Livingston from westbound Immokalee there should be no U-turn. During rush hour only 1 or At least At least At least At least At least 2 cars can u-turn which clogs up one of once a once a once a once a once a Year -Round 12530505727 3/29/21 the left turn lanes. No week week week month week Yes No Resident Direct notification from HOA, At least At least At least friend, Every once a once a once a Year -Round neighbor, 12530466095 3/29/211 INo I I Jday 1week 1week lEveryday 1week IYes INo I Resident etc.... Respondent Start Date Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question Question 5 Question Question Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 a. b. C. d. ID 4 6 7 Very confusing and awkward. Would rather see overpass over I- 75 for traffic heading east on Immokalee Road. Make the left lane (fast lane) so that people wishing to go east on Immokalee Direct can exit while keeping the notification original exit for those going west from HOA, on. This would help with the At least At least At least At least At least friend, Don't keep adding more lights to Immokalee Road. Instead make Vanderbilt Beach congestion in the slow lane on I- once a once a once a once a once a Year -Round neighbor, Road more accessible and extend it out to Oil Well Road, which will help to alleviate 12530434138 3/29/21 Yes 175. week week week 1week week No INo Resident etc.... some of the traffic on Immokalee Road. At least At least At least At least At least Collier once a once a once a once a once a Year -Round County 12530392016 3/29/21 No week week week week week No No Resident website Every Every Year -Round 12530373842 3/29/21 No day Every day Every day Every day day Yes No Resident Social media Anything is better than nothing. This area is so congested and will only get worse Every Every Year -Round I agree with all of the recommendations and definitely will be a great improvement 12530360139 3/29/21 No day Every day Every day Every day day Yes No Resident Social media to this "Miami like" traffic Every Every Year -Round 12530332914 3/29/21 Yes No Do it day Every day Every day Every day day No Yes Resident Social media Get it done! Seasonal Resident Anything is (temporary better than At least residence at If it relieves traffic directly on Immokalee, what now in Every once a Every least 1 month When will 951 Collier Blvd be completed to Bonita Beach RD? That would relieve 12530330788 3/29/21 it's good. Yes It should work play day Every day week Every day day Yes INo per year) Social media some traffic that has to go to 1-75. The easiest thing to do short term is increase the timing of the lights. Before and At least construction is done it would make a huge difference to do a traffic study and get The medians should be removed and a Sounds like Every once a Every Year -Round the timing of the lights at different times of the day adjusted. As of right now the 12530314573 3/29/21 turning lane runs the whole street Yes a good idea day Every day Every day week day Yes No Resident Social media timing does not match the traffic flow The newly opened Logan extension to Bonita Beach Rd This doesnt seem to be an has made efficient design to move the this many trucks, trailers and cars intersection This intersection doesnt get congested I don't through the heavily traveled more Every Every Year -Round 12530308885 3/29/21 enough to warrant this overpass. know interchange. dangerous. day Every day Everyday lEveryday day Yes INo Resident Social media The biggest backups from Logan to 175 occur at the Valewood intersection. Anything to ease the flow of Would love an overpass like golden gate I don't traffic at 1-75 and Immokalee will Every Every Year -Round 12530272736 3/29/21 and airport pulling know help day Every day Every day Every day day Yes No Resident Social media How long will this be Crazy expense how long do you outdated At least At least At least At least At least Collier think this will be out dated and and rebuilt once a once a once a once a once a Year -Round County 12530270273 3/29/21 Build it No rebuilt again? over again? week week week month week Yes No Resident website What's in the 2040 plan we paid for? Respondent Start Date Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question Question 5 Question Question Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 a. b. C. d. ID 4 6 7 Direct notification from HOA, Improvements to Logan Rd. from Immokalee to Bonita Beach Rd. will relieve At least friend, pressure on the 1-75/Immokalee Rd. interchange!! Also, the extension of Collier Every once a Every Year -Round neighbor, Blvd. northbound to Bonita Beach Rd. will become imperative as growth continues 12530254782 3/29/21 1 think as proposed is a great plan!! No INone I like it!! day Every day Every day 1week day Yes INo Resident etc.... to the east of Collier Blvd.!!! How long At least At least Makes sense Less businesses impacted in does this Every once a once a Every Year -Round 12530252223 3/29/21 this intersection. No How long does this take take day week week Every day day Yes No Resident A friend shared it on facebook Year -Round You need to stop approving developments in this area. The Alura apartments 12530251667 3/29/21 No Yes No Resident Social media should have never been allowed Whatever will relieve the congestion will be an improvemen t. Immokalee Rd us just horribly congested, Whatever will relieve the congestion will either be an improvement. Immokalee Rd us just direction, At least At least Collier horribly congested, either direction, much much of the Every once a once a Year -Round County Whatever will relieve the congestion will be an improvement. Immokalee Rd us just 12530223713 3/29/21 of the time! Yes IThis could help. time! day Every day week Every day week No INo Resident website horribly congested, either direction, much of the time! At least Less than At least Every once a once a once a Year -Round 12530190677 3/29/21 Yes day Every day week month month Yes No Resident Social media 1-75 and UniversityParkway. Terrifying! If you ever opt for something like this educate the public on local news media how to drive. We did not learn roundabouts and diverging At least diamond interchanges in Drivers Every once a Every Year -Round Why do they keep building residential and commercial property along Immokalee 1253017900913/29/21 Yes Ed!! day week Everyday lEveryday day Yes INo Resident Social media rd when it clearly can't accommodate the traffic!!! Seasonal Resident (temporary At least residence at I don't once a Every least 1 month 12530145601 3/29/21 That would be good 1know I I Imonth lEveryday lEveryday lEveryday Jday IYes INo per year) I Social media Respondent Question Question 5 Question Question Start. Date Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 a. b. C. d. ID 4 6 7 The suggestions for Logan and Livingston would probably help but the real problem is the 1-75 on and off ramps. The county needs to consider another access to 1-75 off Vanderbilt Beach Road. I understand there will be objections from the communities of Village Walk and Wilshire Lakes but it's clear to those if us who live off Immokalee Road this is necessary. This is something that's long overdue. Also the redesign on Immokalee road at Oakes Blvd. and Valewood Drive At least I don't years ago did not help the Every once a Every Year -Round 12530127429 3/29/211 know situation. day Every day Every day week Jday Yes No lResident Social media This problem needs to be addressed as quickly as possible. These all sound great, but please expand the rest of Collier blvd between Green blvd and City Gate Dr to 3 lanes. It goes from 3 lanes to 2 lanes to 4 lanes all within 12530111495 3/29/21 a mile or two. It makes absolutely no sense and causes so much congestion. Direct notification from HOA, At least At least At least friend, Every once a once a once a Every neighbor, 12530106900 3/29/21 No Iday week week 1week day Yes INo etc.... Any consideration for another on/off ramp for 175 at Vanderbilt? Has there been consideration to adding on and off ramps to 75 at Vanderbilt? What about veterans memorial Blvd. Can this be connected to 75. As more housing is At least At least At least At least At least built east there needs to be more ways to access the highway. Broward County had once a once a once a once a once a Year -Round similar issues as they built the West part of the county. Immokalee cannot continue 12530100720 3/28/21 Yes month month month month month Yes No Resident Social media to be the only east west corridor from 75 between Pine and Bonita Beach. Direct notification from HOA, Looks complicated, clear signs At least At least At least At least At least friend, needed and notice given to once a once a once a once a once a Year -Round neighbor, 12530092551 3/28/21 No learlier which lane to be in. week week week month week Yes INo Resident etc.... It seems like immokalee is so crowded because it is the only road that you can take to get to many new developments east of the highway. And this study area is the only way you can go north. There needs to be alternate ways to get out east At least At least and alternate ways to go north from the I don't Every once a once a Every Year -Round 12530054456 3/28/21 orange tree or east developments. 1know I I Jday I Every day 1week Imonth Jday IYes INo lResident I Social media Respondent Start Date Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question Question 5 Question Question Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 a. b. C. d. ID 4 6 7 Too many issues with people blocking the intersections after the light has turned red. Causes more waiting and traffic and accidents. Maybe put some LEDs out there Every Every Year -Round during rush hour to help people learn they cannot block intersections instead of 12530009225 3/28/21 Good proposal No day Every day Every day Every day day Yes Yes Resident Social media sitting on Vanderbilt and 951 waiting for speeders all day. A dedicated turning lane starting more down the road. Because traffic buils up so Collier fast for both turning lanes, and the middle Every Every Year -Round County 12530006778 3/28/21 traffic can't move some times. Yes day Every day Every day Every day day No Yes Resident website At least At least Every once a once a Every Year -Round 12529978177 3/28/21 Yes day Every day week week day Yes No Resident Social media Collier Yes- QUIT BUILDING! Have access to 1-75 from Collier Blvd. So people do not have Every Every Year -Round County to drive all the way down west to get to 1-75. Better timing of Immokalee stop 12529954229 3/28/21 A good idea H Yes A good idea! Yes day Every day Every day Every day day Yes Yes Resident website lights. Re route construction trucks- especially the big dump trucks. Agree that something needs to be done but hate the idea of construction. What can Had them in IL. Confusing to be done about decreasing rear end collisions ? I must see 3 a week. Currently navigate. I would forsee issues w some drivers are using the extended right turn lanes to speed ahead of stopped the older and the out of town Every Every Year -Round traffic and then they try to merge back in to go straight. PLEASE STOP THIS 12529952690 3/28/21 Good idea Yes driver. day Everyday Everyday Everyday day Yes Yes Resident Social media DANGEROUS behavior. The timing sequence of lights down immokalee rd at the intersections is terrible. The east west route should be timed better to allow stacked traffic to flow. Part of problem is drivers stopping 30 ft short of car in front so they can use cellphone and not hit person in front. The slack between cars creates huge delay. Maybe it is mostly poor or slow drivers during winter because I don't have near the problem when snowbirds leave. But give immokalle flow priority over north south street signals to improve flow and at school intersection (or gulf coast) Don't have much Better timing of lights is an immediate Every Every Year -Round problem on north south street intersections. Just too many lights too close together 12529940400 3/28/21 solution No ITiming of existing signals is poor day Everyday lEveryday Everyday day IYes Yes Resident Social media around i75, Walmart At least At least At least At least At least once a once a once a once a once a Year -Round 12529895599 3/28/21 No month week week week week No No Resident Social media I think this is a good idea only if you can keep traffic moving. No What about an Immokalee overpass going help in over Livingston? That would speed up all I believe I've just used cloverleafs bumper to At least those cars headed to 1-95 and keep traffic I don't like at Goldengate. Do those bumper Every once a Every Year -Round Something MUST be done to improve drive times AND there must be a moratorium 12529885997 3/28/21 moving in all directions. know help? What do the studies show? traffic. day Every day Every day 1week day Yes INo Resident Social media on future development in the area. More concerned at the speed on the immokalee /collier intersection. Waiting to Less turn left at cvs at the light your car literally shudders as traffic thunders by. This At least than intersection is dangerous. Feel like a sitting duck. One lapse of concentration by a Every once a once a Year -Round Email driver could result in a horrible outcome. It already has and the congestion and 12529869581 3/28/21 Yes day Every day week Every day month Yes Yes Resident notification speed is much worse. Am thinking of moving home purely because of the traffic Respondent Question Question 5 Question Question Start Date Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 a. b. C. d. ID 4 6 7 I dont At least At least At least At least I think that plan would be at a standstill understand once a once a once a once a Year -Round Email 12529869332 3/28/21 trying to get onto the overpass it week month week week Yes No Resident notification I just hope whatever is done works. I dread driving as I live right off of immokalee We live in Heritage Greens. It is impossible to get out of our community also we have two schools right next to us. the only schools in Collier County that do not Every Every Year -Round have yellow blinking lights for vehicles to slow down extremely dangerous 12529825835 3/28/21 day Every day Every day Every day day Yes Yes Resident Social media something needs to be done about that Connect the city of Immokalee to 75 to get the giant dump trucks and landscaping trucks off of Immokalee Rd. Also, create new roads that connect to Immokalee At least At least Less than At least At least With all of the new home construction that is happening east of Naples. These fixes Rd. so you can get off to once a once a once a once a once a Year -Round won't help unless there are more roads connected by bridges over all of the canals. 12529754057 3/28/21 Yes lVanderbilt Beach quicker. No week week month 1week week No INo Resident Social media Stop building new schools on Immokalee too!! Collier Every Every Year -Round County 12529745396 3/28/21 No day Every day Every day Every day day No No Resident website Direct notification Less from HOA, At least At least Less than At least than friend, once a once a once a once a once a Year -Round neighbor, if they extend Vanderbilt Beach Road road east of Collier people going south could 12529740083 3/28/21 Good Idea IYes 113adidea. Igoodidea month 1week Imonth week Imonth INo INo lResident etc.... Iget off Immokalee earlier Respondent Question Question 5 Question Question Start Date Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 a. b. C. d. ID 4 6 7 this intersection was just completely redone and that the initial planning overlooked the issue that already existed. Instead of adding turn lanes and traffic signals, the county should consider finding ways for allowing traffic to I love this concept, but to be safely earnest, people are already merge confused as drivers in this region. without If it is smooth, it would be having to This intersection is not the worst, but the exceptional, and the best disrupt the left turn lanes from Immokalee Rd solution would be one that cuts flow of At least At least At least At least At least (westbound) onto Livingston Rd (South) down on the need for excess traffic in once a once a once a once a once a Year -Round We try our best to avoid this and other highly trafficked areas, but coming from the 12529734710 3/28/21 needs longer turning time. No stop -and -go traffic signals. areas week week 1week week week No No Resident Social media Estates, this is still the only option for 10 miles to reach 1-75. You can do that and also consider adding an exit/entrance for 175 on Everglades so that people coming from the estates have an access point to the highway. This plays into the congestion in this area. We also need more that two entry exit points for the GG Estates area. There are not any backstreet/alternative route options because of all of these planned communities that block access to roads that could potentially be alternative routes. I will never understand why there aren't more free standing home building At least in all that open area and only Every once a Year -Round 12529726787 3/28/21 communities being built. Yes day Everyday Everyday lEveryday week No INo Resident Social media At least At least At least At least At least once a once a once a once a once a Year -Round 12529715120 3/28/21 Yes week week week week week No No Resident Social media Respondent Question Question 5 Question Question Start. Date Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 a. b. C. d. ID 4 6 7 At least At least Every once a once a Every Year -Round 12529701932 3/28/21 Do it Yes Do it Do it day week week Every day day Yes No Resident Social media Stop the Thursday, Friday, Saturday drag racing at Immokalee and Collier blvd I think the overpass should be Immokolee Every Every Year -Round 12529669659 3/28/21 over Livingston. No day Every day Every day Every day day Yes No Resident Social media At least Every once a Every Year -Round 12529611051 3/28/21 Yes day Every day month Every day day Yes Yes Resident Social media Collier Do the lights stay green longer in the direction of rush hour. For example have lights Every Every Year -Round County stay green longer for westbound traffic in the morning then same for eastbound 12529291512 3/28/21 day Every day Every day Every day day Yes Yes Resident website traffic in the afternoon. Seasonal Resident (temporary At least At least At least At least At least residence at I don't Seems safer and a cost-effective once a once a once a once a once a least 1 month 12529272366 3/28/21 know measure. Iweek week week week week No No I per year) Social media Seasonal Resident (temporary At least residence at Every once a Every least 1 month 12529222836 3/28/21 No day lEveryday Everyday week Iday Yes No I per year) Social media Go forward At least with the Every once a Every Year -Round 12529190705 3/28/21 Go forward with the plans. Yes Go forward with the plans. plans. day week Every day Every day day No No Resident Social media Raise the money and make it happen. At least At least At least At least At least Looks very confusing for a first once a once a once a once a once a Year -Round 12529159389 3/28/21 Good idea Yes timer in the dark week week week week week Yes No Resident Social media Don't feel an overpass over Immokalee At least from Livingston would be beneficial, this Every once a Every Year -Round 12529146651 3/28/21 intersection is not the problem. Yes I like the ideal. day Every day week Every day day No No Resident Social media On and off ramps at 75 and Vanderbilt would take the traffic off Immokalee and 75. Seasonal Resident (temporary At least At least residence at Every once a once a Every least 1 month Email You need another ramp to 175. Maybe at Immokalee and Collier on side of CVS. 1252914534713/28/21 day Every day week Iweek day Yes INo per year) notification Make another entrance / exit to 75 At least At least At least Monitor the right turns on red. Many Every once a once a once a Year -Round 12529129240 3/28/21 don't yield to uturns. Yes day Every day month week week Yes No Resident Social media Respondent Start Date Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question Question 5 Question Question Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 a. b. C. d. ID 4 6 7 1 hope the study recommendations can be planned for and implemented. I travel Immokalee Rd. between Logan and Airport at least twice a day each way Monday through Friday. One major traffic issue I've noticed is accidents or traffic on 1-75 This would be great, as long as the NB that cause backups on Immokalee Rd. both east and west bound. Are there any improvements at 1-75 happen as well to This would Every Every Year -Round considerations being made for this? It is noticeably worse during the school year, 12529096650 3/28/21 keep the E-W traffic moving. Yes This would be great. be great. day Every day Everyday lEveryday day Yes Yes Resident Social media and even more so during Season. Every Every Year -Round 12529058699 3/28/21 Yes Love The Idea day Every day Every day Every day day No No Resident Social media This makes sense. Seed to Table has increased traffic and has a terrible entry/exit (you can't easily exit to get I moved from KC, and these are Direct back onto Immokalee, and it's challenging used in Lenexa, KS. It takes a notification to enter from Livingston. The overpass moment to get used to the traffic from HOA, makes sense to shrink some of the traffic pattern, but then it works great. At least friend, Strand Blvd/Juliet definitely needs attention. Thanks for working to improve the flow from the store plus from all of the Another area that definitely No Every once a Every Year -Round neighbor, flow of traffic. It is extraordinarily difficult to travel on Immokalee during season for 12529031499 3/28/21 new development on Veterans Pkwy. Yes needs improvement. comments. day Every day Every day 1week day Yes Yes Resident etc.... most hours of the day, and during rush hour, it's challenging every day. Would rather see an overpass similar to Golden Gates and At least At least Airport Every once a once a Year -Round 12528992166 3/28/21 Great idea! Yes Great idea! Pulling. day week Everyday lEveryday week No iNo Resident Social media Definitely worth it as a year round resident of Valencia Golf & Country Club. Direct notification from HOA, At least Less than At least friend, Every once a once a once a Year -Round neighbor, 12528980241 3/28/21 No Iday Every day week imonth month Yes INo Resident etc.... I intend on moving from a development located along Immokalee Road solely The traffic flow is much smoother and because the county has allowed unreasonable growth to occur with no planning for faster, although the lanes can be very At least infrastructure, especially traffic. The commute to or from work on Immokalee confusing if you aren't familiar with the Every once a Every Year -Round Road of five miles takes upwards of one hour at least once per week. The 12528966987 3/28/21 pattern. Yes day Every day week Every day day Yes No Resident Social media construction at Immokalee Road and 951 will further complicate the issues. At least Every once a Every Year -Round 12528884205 3/28/21 No day Every day week Every day day Yes No Resident Social media Don't wait. Do something now before it gets unbearable. Seasonal Resident (temporary At least At least At least residence at once a once a once a least 1 month 12528822028 3/28/21 That is a good idea . No week Every day week week No No per year) Social media Respondent Question Question 5 Question Question Start Date Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 a. b. C. d. ID 4 6 7 Direct notification from HOA, At least At least friend, once a once a Every Year -Round neighbor, The planning commission, obviously was out to lunch when permits were/are 12528814440 3/28/21 Every day week 1week day Yes IYes Resident etc.... handed out to keep building without infrastructure in place. This is not new. The old people and visitors would be a nightmare driving on this setup as they go the wrong way Flyover might work on Livingston ....straight up need more lanes on head on to traffic on just regular Every Every Year -Round 75.... immokolle/75 only backs up because CRE can't get off of immokolle onto 75 12528796930 3/28/21 Yes streets that contain medians.) day Every day Every day Every day day Yes Yes Resident Social media when 75 backs up. 75 carries less cars than immokolle road.... Intersections at 75 and University, up by Sarasota. East is Lakewood Ranch. It was a At least At least At least At least At least Collier bit confusing at first but it's proved to be once a once a once a once a once a Year -Round County 12528775215 3/27/21 a very positive change to the congestion Yes See above No week week week month week Yes Yes Resident website No At least At least At least At least At least Collier I don't once a once a once a once a once a Year -Round County 12528624376 3/27/21 1 think it is a good idea know Good idea month month week week month No No Resident website Seasonal Direct I currently live at Livingston and Ravina Way and work at Immokalee and Goodlette- Resident notification Frank - Immokalee Road definitely needs this. I also am building a home in what is (temporary from HOA, known as Twin Eagles South so this is my main corridor for work. As you know, At least At least residence at friend, accidents are frequently on this road. Construction timing with the Vanderbilt Every once a once a Every least 1 month neighbor, Beach road extension should be considered since this East-West road will offset 12528610009 3/27/21 Great Plan! 100% needed. Yes day Every day week imonth day No INo per year) etc.... some of us 'work' commuters during construction. Thanks At least At least At least Less than At least once a once a once a once a once a Year -Round 12528587342 3/27/21 No week week month month week Yes No Resident Social media Looks more accident prone. Dedicated right turn lanes on east bound Yes. The west bound Immokalee lanes to get to 1-75 NB start only after Immokalee Northbrook/Tarpon Bay signal. The right only turn from Immokalee to Northbrook after signal Collier should be changed to straight and right. This will reduce the significant lane shifts could be Every Every Year -Round County between this signal and the i-75 intersection and redistribute traffic to more 12528578064 3/27/211 INo I Looks more accident prone. 1helpful. Jday lEveryday lEveryday lEveryday Jday IYes INo I Resident 1website 1westbound lanes (people skip the right lanes) Respondent Start Date Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question Question 5 Question Question Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 a. b. C. d. ID 4 6 7 1 sincerely believe that the only way to resolve issues on 1-75 is for the State and County to allot enough $$ to purchase land and install FULL CLOVERLEAFS. This would eliminate 2 traffic light At least At least North of Immokalee Road on Livingston a double lane traffic circle needs to be The entrance and exit at Seed to Table intersections that today address Every once a once a Every Year -Round Email installed at Veterans Memorial. This intersection is going to become more and more 12528538223 3/27/21 needs to be described in some detail. No 4 way traffic. day Every day week month day Yes No Resident notification congested when the apartments and new high school are completed. At least Collier Every once a Year -Round County Need an on/off ramp to 175 on Vanderbilt Beach Road. Don't do any construction 12528500950 3/27/21 Yes day Every day Every day Every day week No No Resident website during 7am and 9pm. When one lane is closed it is a mess! It's not north/south that's bad it's east/west.Signals aren't timed to let You can study this to death..over building with no consideration of traffic.Consider traffic flow.Traffic starting at 2pm backs Not a fan,confusing.Light timing Every Every Year -Round all the delivery, maintainace,utilities,etc has doubled if not tripled since Covid.Lived 12528499956 3/27/21 up east bound to airport rd No would be an improvement day Every day Every day Every day day Yes No Resident Social media here since 1960,to say it's changed is an understatement Every Every Year -Round 12528499060 3/27/21 day Every day Every day Every day day No No Resident Social media Possible solution. How long will it Useless. You need to move the volume take to get built?? Are we further west on Immokalee, not looking at 5 years down the road north/south on Livingston. Once the light to complete all studies, permits, goes red westbound on Immokalee traffic approvals and actual Potential Every Every Year -Round 12528456123 3/27/21 will back up. Yes construction?? solution day Every day Every day Every day day Yes No Resident Social media Yes, 10 years too late. Build an on -off ramp for 75 in both direct Seasonal at Vanderbilt Road. That'll keep people Resident from feeding (funneling) to either Pine Less (temporary Ridge or immokalee. At the moment too At least At least At least than residence at Build an on -off ramp for 75 in both direct at Vanderbilt Road. That'll keep people much traffic funnels from other roads to once a once a once a once a least 1 month from feeding (funneling) to either Pine Ridge or immokalee. At the moment too 12528438796 3/27/21 get on the highway. week week Imonth month No INo per year) much traffic funnels from other roads to get on the highway. At least This would likely slow and not Every once a Every Year -Round 12528399516 3/27/21 Yes improve traffic flow. day week day Yes No Resident Social media Direct notification from HOA, At least At least At least At least friend, once a once a once a once a Year -Round neighbor, 12528396489 3/27/21 This seems reasonable and effective No Iweek Every day month month Iweek Yes IYes Resident etc.... At least Every once a Year -Round 12528370879 3/27/21 Yes day Every day Every day Every day week Yes No Resident Social media This looks like less construction I hope this doesn't mean 5 years of Again I hope this doesn't mean 5 than the Every Every Year -Round 12528330655 3/27/21 construction Yes years of construction other two. day Every day Every day Every day day Yes No Resident Social media Respondent Start Date Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question Question 5 Question Question Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 a. b. C. d. ID 4 6 7 It may help some but the problem of the big jam up is turning right onto Immokalee ... so I'm not sure an overpass would alleviate that issue. It would be nice though if people were trying to get up into Bonita without going onto 75. 1 doubt that people r doing that anyway because of the congestion of turning right I don't Probably Every Every Year -Round 12528314477 3/27/21 then left onto 75. know I definitely think that would help. would help. day Everyday Everyday lEveryday day No JNo Resident Social media Direct notification from HOA, friend, Every Every Year -Round neighbor, 12528313670 3/27/21 No Iday Every day Everyday lEveryday day Yes INo Resident etc.... At least I don't Every once a Every Year -Round 12528307670 3/27/21 know day Every day week Every day day No Yes Resident Social media Stop building in the estates until increased traffic issues solved Direct notification from HOA, friend, Every Every Year -Round neighbor, 12528305487 3/27/21 no No Ino day Everyday Everyday lEveryday day Yes INo Resident etc.... no Direct notification Operations on Immokolee can not remain from HOA, similar what they r today - all operations friend, need changed - not sure about overpass Hopefully this will work to Every Every Year -Round neighbor, 12528249906 3/27/21 now if nothing changes Immokolee No Ichange Immokolee Not familiar day Every day day Yes Resident etc.... Thanks and hurry Direct notification from HOA, At least At least Less than friend, once a once a once a Every Year -Round neighbor, 12528221909 3/27/211 1week I Every day week month Iday Yes Yes lResident etc.... Direct notification from HOA, Immokalee is far too congested!!!! Strand Blvd access to Immokalee is not Wouldn't it make more sense to build a At least friend, designed to handle the traffic load. With the forthcoming build out of commercial overpass on Immakolee rather than once a Every Year -Round neighbor, properties between Strand Blvd/Juliet and Livingston on Immokalee Rds south side, 12528192122 3/27/21 Livingston? Fine improvement! Every day week day Yes No Resident etc.... Immokalee traffic will go from really awful to intolerable!!! Every Every Year -Round 12528177400 3/27/21 day Every day Every day Every day day No No Resident Social media Respondent Start Date Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question Question 5 Question Question Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 a. b. C. d. ID 4 6 7 Seasonal Resident (temporary At least At least residence at Collier I agree with Every once a once a least 1 month County Need to flow traffic north and south off of Immokalee using all points given the 12528162629 3/27/21 1 agree with this decision No this decision day week Everyday lEveryday week Yes INo per year) website topography. This is way better than current roads now! On ramp to 1-75 north needs to be 2 lanes from east side along with two lanes from west side. Build a bridge on the canel to access this. It will relive the congestion. Also you need to extend 951 to Bonita Something needs to change ASAP. The worst part of everyone's day is the traffic beach road as this will funnel going home. You guys need to do a better job cause it's becoming an unstable everyone from the estate that roadway. Stop wasting money and make some changes. The light system is awful, are traveling north to Lee county Less the roads east of 75 need to be connected to Bonita beach road. More than just away from this intersection than Logan. 951 and immokalee past oil well also needs to be connected to Bonita beach which will drastically relieve the Every once a Year -Round Road. If this is done all the congestion at 1-75 and Immokalee will relief from 1252812862813/27/21 Yes 1congestion. day Every day Everyday lEveryday month No IYes Resident Social media workers trying to get home. Seasonal Direct Resident notification (temporary from HOA, At least residence at friend, Every once a Every least 1 month neighbor, 12528051467 3/27/21 1 really like this idea Iday Everyday lEveryday month day Yes INo per year) etc.... Seasonal Resident (temporary At least At least At least At least At least residence at once a once a once a once a once a least 1 month 12527813310 3/27/21 Yes Iweek week week 1week week Yes IYes per year) Social media I support this if it will reduce the I strongly Every Every Year -Round Traffic in this area is among the worst in Naples. I'm thrilled something is finally 12527716757 3/27/21 1 strongly support this. Yes traffic in this location. support this. day Every day Every day Every day day Yes No Resident Social media going to be done. I strongly support these measures. Respondent Question Question 5 Question Question Start Date Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 a. b. C. d. ID 4 6 7 1 go to UTC mall (Sarasota) at that intersection a lot. I freak out at that exit. There are lots of OLD people in Florida who are disoriented and confused while driving ... and they take meds and drink too. I'm an excellent 49 year old driver and still get confused —you end up driving on The golden gate parkway overpass has the wrong side of the road. It's I live in Esplanade, I'm a mom and drive this route daily for child's activities. Please not relieved much, it still get backed up at not that well marked. Not a good think about the demographics of drivers. Other cities have bypasses and freeways. the Goodlette rd intersection at rush plan. Please NO000000!!!!!!!! I Every Every Year -Round 1-75 traffic going to Marco should be routed east of 951 and the 1-75 should have 12527675900 3/27/21 hour. I'd look into other options. Yes live at this exit!!!! day Every day Everyday lEveryday day No INo Resident Social media more exits for city traffic. Direct notification from HOA, At least At least At least friend, Every once a once a once a Year -Round neighbor, 12527646287 3/27/21 Yes day week week I Every day week Yes INo Resident etc.... At least Every once a Every Year -Round 12527586668 3/27/21 Yes day Every day Every day week day No Yes Resident Direct notification from HOA, At least Less than friend, Every once a once a Every Year -Round neighbor, 12527582986 3/27/21 No Iday Every day week imonth day Yes INo Resident etc.... Seasonal Resident (temporary At least At least At least At least At least residence at once a once a once a once a once a least 1 month 12527582585 3/27/21 No Iweek week week 1week week No INo per year) Social media This At least At least At least At least At least It's gotta be better then what's definitely once a once a once a once a once a Year -Round Put an exit/entrance ramps at 1-75 and Vanderbilt Beach Rd. This will take pressure 12527572215 3/27/21 .1 think an overpass is needed. No there now. should help. week week week week week No No Resident Social media off of Immokalee and 1-75 and Pine Ridge and 1-75 exits. At least At least At least Collier Every once a once a once a Every Year -Round County 12527570716 3/27/21 No day week week week day Yes No Resident website There definitely needs to be an overpass here. It is far too congested heading east At least At least At least At least At least on Immokalee at rush hour. Traffic light once a once a once a once a once a Year -Round 12527561631 3/27/21 patterns do not help the traffic. Yes week week week week week No Yes Resident Social media Respondent Question Question 5 Question Question Start Date Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 a. b. C. d. ID 4 6 7 STOP the new At least STOP the new developement!! roads are STOP the new developement!!!! developeme Every once a Year -Round commissioners need to listen to the people and not their OWN pockets and STOP 12527497128 3/27/21 insufficient already. No roads are out of control NOW. nt! day Every day Everyday Everyday week No No Resident Social media additional development until infrastructure is built!! At least At least At least At least once a once a once a once a Year -Round 12527484992 3/27/21 Yes week week week week No No Resident Social media Four lane Logan Rd all the way to Bonita Springs Rd Seasonal Resident (temporary At least At least At least At least At least residence at Shorten the green traffic light on once a once a once a once a once a least 1 month synchronize the traffic lights so there are less stopping in the morning rush and 12527480258 3/27/21 Livingston No Ilooks unusual and dangerous. no week week week Iweek week Yes INo per year) Social media change for the evening rush hour. Direct notification from HOA, At least At least At least friend, once a once a once a Every Year -Round neighbor, 1252746822613/27/21 week week Iweek day Yes INo Resident etc.... This should be the last project. At least At least At least Most people using Immokalee Every once a once a once a Year -Round 12527442770 3/27/21 Like it and it should be first on the list. No are full time and live close by. Like it. day Every day week week week No Yes Resident Social media Respondent Start. Date Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question Question 5 Question Question Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 a. b. C. d. ID 4 6 7 major problem is everyone wanting to go to 75 and places further west - might help turning south on Logan - no one is going to use Logan northbound as an alternative to get to northbound 75 without vast improvemen is to The diagram shown seems to northbound suggest no improvement to the Logan, ramps to 75. Since the problem which even Direct is east -west on Immokalee with recent notification (especially west bound improvemen from HOA, Since Collier County does not want to get serious about limiting development, you The problem is east -west traffic on Immokalee onto northbound 75) is is still a 2 At least At least friend, are already behind the curve on what the problem will really look like in 20 years, Immokalee, so how much help would this because of ramp back up, not lane Every once a once a Every Year -Round neighbor, not only on Immokalee but also Vanderbilt and Pine Ridge, from all development 12527401351 3/27/21 be if Immokalee remains relatively similar? No Iclear how this could really help roadway day week week I Every day day Yes INo Resident etc.... that will continue to be allowed east of Collier Blvd and Immokalee Rd northbound At least Collier once a Every Year -Round County 12527386752 3/27/21 Overpass No month Every day Every day Every day day No No Resident website This would be helpful however most of This would the excess traffic is coming from the be At least At least At least orange tree, Valencia and imokkalee somewhat Every once a once a once a Year -Round 12527383432 3/27/21 areas. Yes helpful. day week week Every day week Yes No Resident Social media Seasonal Resident (temporary Where will bikers and pedestrians go? At least residence at Terrible to get down Immokalee on North Every once a Every least 1 month 12527380551 3/27/21 side. No sidewalks after Livingston. Yes day Every day week Every day Iday Yes No I per year) Social media Please make this area more bike and pedestrian friendly At least Every once a Every Year -Round 12527377173 3/27/21 No day Every day Every day week day Yes Yes Resident Social media Respondent Question Question 5 Question Question Start Date Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 a. b. C. d. ID 4 6 7 Seasonal Resident (temporary At least At least residence at Every once a once a least 1 month 12527374271 3/27/21 Yes Iday Every day week Every day week Yes INo per year) Slow the growth first, which has created the problems in the 1st place. First the Golden Gate Parkway bridge, now Livingston Rd? You'll end up with Miami, At least At least Collier and then people will start looking for the Every once a once a Every Year -Round County 12527360839 3/27/21 next Naples. No day Every day week month day Yes Yes Resident website Seasonal Resident (temporary residence at Every Every least 1 month 12527327159 3/27/21 Yes Iday Everyday Everyday lEveryday day No INo per year) Social media Direct notification from HOA, At least At least At least friend, This would make it difficult to access What was once a residential area once a once a once a Every Year -Round neighbor, 12527314722 3/27/21 Livingston Rd. from Immokalee Rd. No is going to no longer be so. month Every day 1week month day Yes INo Resident etc.... Direct notification from HOA, friend, Every Year -Round neighbor, 12527285545 3/27/21 It will make things worse. No Every day Iday Yes INo Resident etc.... Change the lights more frequently. Collier Every Every Year -Round County 12527283675 3/27/21 Yes day Every day Every day Every day day Yes No Resident website Seasonal Resident (temporary At least At least At least At least residence at once a once a once a once a least 1 month 12527242060 3/27/21 Yes Iweek week week Iweek Yes INo per year) Social media At least At least once a once a Every Year -Round 12527233154 3/27/21 Strongly agree and recommend Yes Strongly recommend Do it week Every day Every day week day No Yes Resident Social media Sooner rather than later It was very unsafe and accidents At least Collier all of the time. Not looking Every once a Every Year -Round County 12527230354 3/27/21 Yes forward to the one on colonial! day Every day Every day week day Yes No Resident website Respondent Question Question 5 Question Question Start Date Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 a. b. C. d. ID 4 6 7 Not sure this will help. Traffic northbound on Logan at Immokolee At least At least At least Something is needed and welcome the has been Every once a once a once a Year -Round 12527227857 3/27/21 change, Yes horrific!! day week week Every day week Yes INo Resident Social media Seasonal Direct Resident notification (temporary from HOA, At least At least At least residence at friend, once a once a once a least 1 month neighbor, 12527220017 3/27/21 Great idea! Yes IGood idea. week Every day Every day 1week week Yes INo per year) etc.... 6 month seasonal resident. Seasonal Resident Appreciate the study and attention given to these issues. The traffic is horrendous (temporary and with recent area growth most definitely needs to be addressed. Having residence at continuous follow/no light for lanes coming off of and onto 75 would also help ease Every Every least 1 month Email congestion. Also the light at strand blvd and immokolee needs to the timing looked 12527214769 3/27/21 No Iday Every day Everyday lEveryday day Yes INo per year) notification at, it has a very very long delay coming out of the community. Direct notification from HOA, At least At least At least Less than friend, once a once a once a once a Every Year -Round neighbor, Exiting Strand Blvd. onto Immokalee needs to be addressed as well. Backups can be 12527208258 3/27/21 No I Looks good. week week week imonth day Yes INo Resident etc.... horriffic. Seasonal Resident (temporary How much traffic would come off At least At least residence at Immokalee with this expensive Livingston once a once a Every least 1 month Instead of an overpass at Livingston, how about an overpass as an entrance and exit 12527197084 3/27/21 overpass? No week Every day Every day 1week day Yes Iper year) on 1 75? Direct notification from HOA, At least At least friend, Every once a once a Every Year -Round neighbor, 12527188113 3/27/21 Yes Iday Every day week imonth day Yes INo Resident etc.... This may work. And have At least At least At least At least Collier You were talking about a right turn lane on Wink news from Oakes , there is already motorist not wait forever at once a once a once a once a Year -Round County a right turn from Oakes onto Immokalee. May be a left turn(Westbiund) May work 12527183461 3/27/21 1 think an overpass would be a great idea. Yes traffic light week Every day week week week No No Resident website too Respondent Start Date Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question Question 5 Question Question Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 a. b. C. d. ID 4 6 7 At least At least At least At least I don't Every once a once a once a once a Year -Round 12527177963 3/27/21 know day month week month month Yes No Resident Social media Logan needs to be a Why would you have Livingston go over wider road At least At least Immokalee instead of the other way Looks very awkward and of at least 4 Every once a once a Every Year -Round 12527172227 3/27/21 around?? No complicated. lanes. day Every day week month day No No Resident Social media Logan Blvd us two lanes Will it be widened to accommodat ethe extra Every Every Year -Round 12527159307 3/27/21 Please make one improvement at a time No traffic??? day Every day Everyday lEveryday day Yes IYes Resident Social media Stop building !!! If this fixes the merging left turn at Logan While probably the biggest where impact, this will take awhile for drivers race seniors and snowbirds to adjust each other to, and they've taken forever to while finish the one at Colonial. Also, turning the speeds that drivers get up to from on Colonial are not comparable immokalee Please communicate with the local news so people know what's going on. Please to immokalee, and I'm not onto Logan, work with contractors to schedule major work outside of holiday season peak times Because it is similar to a local road, it referring to the speed limit. If you then it's like thanksgiving and Christmas. Also, first week of back to school times, as there might be easier for our senior drivers to grew up here you know what I probably for Every Every Year -Round are several schools and daycares along that corridor. There are so many children in 12527148476 3/27/21 adjust to, as well as the rest of us. Yes mean! the best. day Every day Everyday JEveryday day No INo Resident Social media vehicles that go through here, including mine. Good luck! Every Every Year -Round 12527121187 3/27/21 Yes day Every day Every day Every day day Yes No Resident Social media Adding more traffic lights seems counter intuitive in If it's proven to help - we should trying to At least I think the entire Livingston road should do it. Even if the public is improve Every once a Every Year -Round 12527119833 3/27/211 have these overpasses. INo 1concerned about confusion. Itraffic. Jday Imonth lEveryday JEveryday Jday INo INo lResident I Social media Respondent Question Question 5 Question Question Start Date Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 a. b. C. d. ID 4 6 7 Would be better if overpass was for immokalee road going over livingston. Elevated 4-lane roadway (similar to gateway expressway in tampa) entire length Immokalee has more traffic and would At least At least between livingston and Logan. Only get on/off roadway at 75 and at livingston and benefit from not having a traffic light on Every once a once a Year -Round Logan. Those that want to get off 75 for travel to juliet or strand, or other roadway 12527079866 3/27/21 the overpass. Yes day week Every day Every day week Yes No Resident Social media between logan and livingston would exit as they do now. At least At least At least I don't like it, confuses older Seems like a Every once a once a once a Year -Round 12527071314 3/27/21 Seems like it could work. Good idea Yes drivers good idea day Every day week week week Yes Yes Resident Social media Every Every Year -Round 12527054186 3/27/21 No day Every day Every day Every day day No No Resident Social media Seasonal Direct Resident notification (temporary from HOA, At least At least residence at friend, once a once a Every least 1 month neighbor, 12527047401 3/27/21 week Everyday imonth day IYes No per year) etc.... Direct Confusing - notification not sure from HOA, how you At least friend, If it will speed up traffic I'm all for turn left Every once a Every Year -Round neighbor, 12527044853 3/27/21 No I it! onto Logan day week Everyday lEveryday day Yes INo Resident etc.... Direct notification from HOA, At least friend, I dont know how this would Every once a Every Year -Round neighbor, 12527044663 3/27/21 looks like an improvement. No I improve the flow. day week Everyday lEveryday day Yes INo Resident etc.... Alot of the problem is people At least I don't wanting to get on 75. Would Every once a Every Year -Round 12527016856 3/27/21 know another exit/entrance to it help? day week day Yes Yes Resident I heard about it on the Wink News website. I live in the study area. Looks like it could be I do not like this type. Extremely confusing At least At least At least At least At least Collier I have used the AirportPulling/Golden large area with difficult lines of for the once a once a once a once a once a Year -Round County 12527012362 3/27/21 Gate often. This is a good option. Yes vision. elderly. week week week week week No No Resident website Respondent Question Question 5 Question Question Start. Date Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 a. b. C. d. ID 4 6 7 1 fail to see how adding more travfic lights will alleviate anything. This seems to alleviates It would make more sense to have the I don't see how this alleviates Logan traffic overpass for the Immokalee traffic instead traffic. It only diverts it differently as opposed of the Livingston traffic! It seems the and in doing so will confuse the to At least At least At least At least At least These solutions seem ridiculous. Traffic is unbearable. I usually drive Vanderbilt to traffic concerns are ON Immokalee and I don't elderly population here and Immokalee once a once a once a once a once a Year -Round try to aboid Immokalee but that is just as crowded now too. I live at Immokalee and 12527004438 3/27/21 not on Livingston. know icause more accidents. road traffic. week week week 1week week No INo Resident Social media Wilson, so my choices are limited. Seasonal Resident (temporary At least At least Less than residence at Every once a once a once a Every least 1 month 12527000931 3/27/21 No Iday week month imonth day Yes INo per year) Collier Every Every Year -Round County 12526995255 3/27/21 N/A Yes N/A N/A day Every day Every day Every day day Yes No Resident website N/A Seasonal Resident (temporary At least At least At least At least residence at I live near Immokalee and Collier. I hope the planned overpass there will be built The traffic is on Immokalee Rd. How These seem once a once a once a once a least 1 month soon. Traffic is a nightmare now on Immokalee all the way to 41. Thank you for 12526993525 3/27/21 much traffic is really on Livingston? No Not sure what this would do. dangerous. week week month Every day month No INo per year) Social media asking. At least Every once a Every Year -Round Please get the improvements going. The area is a train wreck and especially the 12526984795 3/27/21 It will not be pretty but I support it Yes Support it day Every day Every day week day Yes Yes Resident Social media i75north ramp! Partial Displaced Every Every Year -Round 12526970221 3/27/21 Overpass would be great Yes DDI Left day Every day Every day Every day day No No Resident Wink News Anything would help! This is our intersection At least and it's very Every once a Year -Round 12526966463 3/27/21 Yes, this would be a great idea!!!!! Yes I Good idea!!! Jdangerous. Jday Everyday lEveryday lEveryday 1week IYes INo lResident Isocial media Isomething needs to be done as immokalee rd is a mess in season. Thank you! Respondent Question Question 5 Question Question Start Date Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 a. b. C. d. ID 4 6 7 Direct notification from HOA, At least At least friend, Every once a once a Every Year -Round neighbor, 12526961370 3/27/21 Needed Yes IThey work pretty well No day Every day 1week week day Yes INo Resident etc.... Every Every Year -Round 12526955609 3/27/21 No day Every day Every day Every day day Yes No Resident Social media At least At least At least Less than once a once a once a once a Every Year -Round Email 12526947004 3/27/21 Works. Rey well at GG and Airport No month week month month day Yes No Resident notification Direct notification from HOA, At least Less than friend, once a once a Every Year -Round neighbor, 12526946342 3/27/21 Every day month imonth day Yes INo Resident etc.... Direct notification from HOA, Would this back up traffic coming Do not quite At least At least friend, Similar to Airport and Golden Gate I off of 75 in either direction under grasp this Every once a once a Every Year -Round neighbor, 12526918840 3/27/21 believe, seems to work there. No Ithe bridge? one day Every day week imonth day Yes INo Resident etc.... Anything that can be done to ease the congestion would be welcome. Seasonal Sounds a Resident The Golden Gate Pkwy/Airport-Pulling possible (temporary approach seems to work pretty well so I approach at At least At least At least At least At least residence at think they could do the same at this Logan and once a once a once a once a once a least 1 month Email 12526908801 3/27/21 overpass. No Immokalee. week week week imonth week Yes INo per year) notification It will be a good analysis if it actually leads to significant improvements in the area. As a resident of Carlton Lakes, there is no safe way to exit from main gate or back resident gate, to go south on Livingston. The overpass will negate a break in traffic flow to allow one to cross over Livingston to go south, especially from the back resident gate. Avery scary, dangerous crossing every time as it is now. Could sensor lights be installed at the Carlton Lakes Blvd back gate which is also across Seasonal from the main Delasol community Resident entrance. It is a horror show waiting to (temporary happen at that crossroad location. Many residence at accidents and near accidents are already least 1 month 12526898342 3/27/21 happening there. Yes per year) Respondent Question Question 5 Question Question Start Date Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 a. b. C. d. ID 4 6 7 Seasonal Direct Resident notification (temporary from HOA, At least At least At least Less than residence at friend, once a once a once a once a Every least 1 month neighbor, 12526880166 3/27/21 Yes Iweek week week imonth day Yes INo per year) etc.... At least At least I don't Every once a once a Every Year -Round Email Please fix it as soon as possible. It is a huge headache for us, the Strand residents, to 12526876944 3/27/21 know day Every day week week day Yes Yes Resident notification get home, or anywhere during season and during rush hour. Thank you! Direct notification from HOA, At least Less than Less than At least friend, once a once a once a once a Year -Round neighbor, 12526865341 3/27/21 No Imonth Every day month imonth week Yes INo Resident etc.... Especially bad during season, but always Collier congested. Double right turn lane onto Year -Round County Re doing the Massey Road widening would elevate some Immokalee Road 12526817690 3/27/21 Immokalee would be better. Yes No Resident website congestion by diverting traffic to Vanderbilt Beach Rd. Massey is in bad condition. Seasonal Resident (temporary At least At least At least residence at Every once a once a once a Every least 1 month Email 12526806369 3/27/21 1day week week 1week day Yes IYes per year) notification Seasonal Resident (temporary I think it's a At least At least residence at If it would reduce traffic I would great Every once a once a Every least 1 month 12526785911 3/27/21 I think it's an excellent suggestion! No be in favor of it. suggestion. day Every day 1week month day Yes INo per year) Social media At least At least Not sure I understand how this Every once a once a Every Year -Round Something more needs to be done at Valewood to keep people from blocking the 12526768705 3/27/21 This is perfect No would help. day week Every day week day Yes No Resident Social media intersection. Direct notification from HOA, You need to address the traffic at Golden Gate high school and Inis Vove friend, neighborhood. High school students use Ibis vove entrance to leave and arrive at Every Every Year -Round neighbor, school. There is no light at this intersection and no left hand turn opportunity. It is 1252673828813/27/21 No Iday Every day Everyday lEveryday day Yes INo Resident etc.... very dangerous for residents at Ibis Cove. Seasonal Direct Resident notification Definitely need a sound barrier (temporary from HOA, wall to protect established residence at friend, communities such as Strand from Every Every least 1 month neighbor, 12526735978 3/27/211 Excellent idea IYes I increased lane traffic. I Jday lEveryday lEveryday I Jday IYes INo I per year) etc.... Respondent Start Date Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question Question 5 Question Question Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 a. b. C. d. ID 4 6 7 At least At least At least Every once a once a once a Every Year -Round Email 12526734888 3/27/21 Yes day week week week day Yes No Resident notification Direct notification from HOA, Very difficult and relatively friend, dangerous, especially when there Every Every Year -Round neighbor, 12526710195 3/27/21 Yes I is heavy traffic No day Everyday lEveryday day Yes IYes Resident etc.... The County continues to allow construction of apartment buildings, shopping, retail, hotels along Immokalee and Livingston, in spite of neighbor and residents complainants that such (1) are in violation of the Land Development Code and Zoning Laws and (2) will bring too much traffic on roads that are already at capacity and failing. Then, the County miraculously finds that the neighbors are wrong and that there is plenty capacity for additional traffic and approves the These are very confusing and project. Thereafter, just a few months very noisy. How are you going to after approving those projects, the protect communities from the County tells us that our roads are failing excess cars, their noise and Abide by the land development plan and zoning laws. DO NOT continue with spot and that we will be required to live pollution. This is getting out of Direct zoning by allowing amendments to those on a daily basis. The traffic, noise, between two large over and underpasses hand. Are you going to install notification pollution along the major arteries and along I-75 is making living here unbearable. to accommodate more cars, more noise, noise barrier walls and tress from HOA, We have to yell at each otherjust to be heard in our lanais. It takes 20 minutes to more pollution and an utter destruction along communities that are At least friend, go 4 miles to Target. It takes 30 minutes to go 2.5 miles to Home Depot. Yet, of our neighborhoods, walkability, bike within a mile of these Every once a Every Year -Round neighbor, building and density continues in violation of the growth management plan, land 12526709641 3/26/21 ability and quality of life. Yes intersections at 1-75? day Every day Every day 1week day Yes INo Resident etc.... development code and zoning laws. At least At least Less than At least At least once a once a once a once a once a Year -Round Email 12526700527 3/26/21 No week week month month week Yes No Resident notification Direct notification from HOA, At least At least At least friend, once a once a once a Every Year -Round neighbor, 12526691301 3/26/21 No Iweek Every day month imonth day Yes INo Resident etc.... Direct notification from HOA, Certainly not necessary at At least At least At least friend, Immokalee and Livingston Road Every once a once a once a Year -Round neighbor, 1252668516713/26/21 Yes intersection!!! day Every day week week month Yes No Resident etc.... It would be a ridiculous construction nightmare where there is no need!! Respondent Question Question 5 Question Question Start Date Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 a. b. C. d. ID 4 6 7 At least At least Every once a once a Every Year -Round Email 12526668018 3/26/21 No day Every day week month day Yes Yes Resident notification Seasonal Resident (temporary At least At least At least At least residence at once a once a once a once a Every least 1 month 12526589480 3/26/21 Yes Iweek week week 1week day Yes INo per year) Social media I'm in favor of any changes which will relieve congestion on Immokale Direct notification from HOA, At least At least friend, once a once a Every Year -Round neighbor, Something needs to be done with the constant congestion and ability to leave the 12526562166 3/26/21 week Every day imonth day Yes INo Resident etc.... strand with only one laying available to through traffic and turns Direct notification from HOA, Yes, it looks like a nightmare of At least At least friend, construction issues that will make Every once a once a Every Year -Round neighbor, 1252651104013/26/21 No 1driving on Immokalee impossible. day Every day week imonth day Yes INo Resident etc.... Direct notification from HOA, friend, Every Every Year -Round neighbor, The problem is and Michael Lee Road too congested this is only a Band-Aid 12526505104 3/26/21 day Every day Every day I Every day day Yes INo Resident etc.... approach maybe you should try a double Dekker highway At least At least At least At least Every once a once a once a once a Year -Round 12526504628 3/26/21 Yes day week week week week No No Resident Social media The worst intersection is at Valewood Every Every Year -Round 12526502180 3/26/21 No day Every day Every day Every day day No No Resident Social media Why would Immokalee road not be the one to overpass Livingston to keep the I don't Looks complicated the old people Every Every Year -Round 12526362996 3/26/21 traffic on Immokalee flowing? know wouldn't figure it out day Every day Every day Every day day Yes Yes Resident Social media Pine ridge and airport is a cluster. Exit for 1-75 & Vanderbilt? Thank you At least At least At least Every once a once a once a Year -Round 12526184417 3/26/21 day month week Every day month No No Resident Social media Respondent Question Question 5 Question Question Start. Date Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 a. b. C. d. ID 4 6 7 1 live in Olde Cypress and anything to Excellent idea. I drive the Golden I hate the idea of more improve Gate/Airport intersection with some construction at this intersection traffic flow Every Every Year -Round Email Traffic lights are timed very poorly or not at all especially during rush hours. Timing 12525968345 3/26/21 regularity. Yes but I think it's an improvement is welcome! day Every day Everyday lEveryday day Yes INo Resident notification the lights for east -west flow would make a difference! Daniels Pkwy is a mess often. Clearly, doesn't At least People here can't drive a straight work too Every once a Every Year -Round 12525962417 3/26/21 Stop overdevelopment. Yes line on simple, wide, level roads. well there. day Every day Every day 1week day Yes IYes Resident Social media Seasonal Resident (temporary At least At least At least At least At least residence at once a once a once a once a once a least 1 month Need better syncing of traffic lights in that area. And police presence at peak times 12525809556 3/26/21 No Imonth month month imonth month Yes INo per year) Social media to prevent "blocking the box' which only makes traffic back ups worse. It's a good idea, but the older crowd will hate it, just like Seasonal roundabouts. Note I am 65 but I Resident am OK with this. We have a few (temporary should not be the first choice - this near where I live in Michigan and At least At least At least At least At least residence at The sooner you this this the better. You also need better enforcement. Some of intersection backs up only because of 1-75 they work well if designed abd once a once a once a once a once a least 1 month the congestion is because drivers enter an intersection and then get caught by the 12525719565 3/26/21 and congestion east of 1-75 Yes marked well week week 1week month week IYes No per year) Social media light and block the traffic in other directions That will help but Logan extension already The older population and tourists needs to be that travel from the United States widened. Collier County and Florida in general is a desired place to live. This county is growing and abroad will not be able to This road 10 fold and if infrastructure doesn't become a priority it's going to turn into the East figure this out. This is a disaster should have cost. I lived in Washington DC for 4 years during college before coming back to waiting to happen. Full time been built Naples. Traffic in Naples is worse than it is there because they have the residents will be able to adapt as a 4 lane infrastructure. I understand that bridges and interchanges aren't pretty but people but it's to much when you have road to Every Every Year -Round don't care. They don't want to sit in traffic all day because the county doesn't want 12525559965 3/26/21 Yes las many tourist as Naples does. begin with. day Every day Everyday lEveryday day Yes INo Resident Social media to build a road that may be an eye sore. Please start building roads!! At least At least At least At least At least once a once a once a once a once a Year -Round 12525511264 3/26/21 Yes week week week week week No No Resident Social media Respondent Start Date Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question Question 5 Question Question Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 a. b. C. d. ID 4 6 7 Direct notification Looks great. Love the Golden Yes. Had the pleasure of driving from HOA, Gate/Airport configuration and look through the first one ever built in At least At least At least friend, forward to seeing that plan implemented Chicago and like it a lot. They Every once a once a once a Year -Round neighbor, Love the opportunity to participate and understand proposed changes before the 12525461833 3/26/21 here. Yes 1work. day Every day week 1week week Yes IYes Resident etc.... construction begins. Not sure if that will do enoughfor this Worried the elderly and some intersection At least At least Live 2 miles from Livingston intersection in study. Southbound traffic is getting Add a double decker overpass with one other drivers will be confused. going Every once a once a Year -Round very backed up in the mornings now. Seems likes there is an issue with the light 12525030038 3/26/21 for Immokalee also. Yes lWould work great otherwise. east/west day Every day Every day 1week week No INo Resident Social media timing in the am. Keep the I like this just hope the dump construction would not be done Trucks off Every Every Year -Round I'm glad something is trying to be done. While I don't have the answers I appreciate 12524387550 3/26/21 None No during season. Logan!!!!!!! day Every day Every day Every day day Yes No Resident Social media the effort to fix the problem Never had a problem with livingston at I believe that the implementations on Immokalee are crucial and should be moved immokalee even when going to seed to At least At least At least At least At least forward with. I think 175 @ Immokalee should be #1 focus and first project table on a busy day. I like the once a once a once a once a once a Year -Round underway. The rest of the changes don't seem immediately necessary from my 12524387404 3/26/21 implementations. Yes This may be the correct answer month month month month month No No Resident Social media experience but I can see how lengthening turn lanes could be a huge help. Traffic situation will not be rectified until the onramp for northbound 175 is extended so When reviewing the proposals, one has to wonder if a person has actually gone out that people can get on and get to the locations and observed traffic. Four instance, extending the westbound left merged. That will probably turn lane turning southbound onto Valewood has never been observed as an issue. require an enlargement of the In both the morning and afternoon heavy traffic hours, often traffic will back up bridge over the Cocohatchee through the intersections, especially at Valewood, where the vehicles will enter the River. Until you do this nothing intersection and not be able to clear before the light changes. This only multiplies will improve because of the At least the congestion for traffic trying intersect with uncleared vehicles blocking them. congestion backing up trying to Every once a Every Year -Round The solution - and a much more cost efficient one - would be to strictly enforce the 12524370302 3/26/21 No Imerge onto the interstate day Every day Every day 1week day Yes IYes Resident Social media "do not block intersection" traffic signs already in place. Please please please pleasssssse do not do this project during season!!!!! I am not sure why but CC thinks road construction should be done during season at 8 am and Every Every Year -Round 5 pm. Immokalee road is a nightmare already. Thank you for looking into making 12524349096 3/26/21 No day Every day Every day Every day day No Yes Resident Social media improvements but I think you need to make those improvements off season. Stop building. The amount of construction that is planned off Immokalee Road east of Collier Blvd literally warrants that Immokalee Road become a freeway with exits at Collier Blvd, Logan, and Livingston Rd (in addition of course to 1-75). I'm fairly certain that homeowners such as my husband and I did not "sign up" to hear a Unfortunately most people have Direct multi- lane expressway in our backyard. There simply is not enough that can be difficulty following traffic signals, notification done to mitigate the traffic from the planned outreach of development further East I think this is a bit overkill for this staying in lanes and navigating from HOA, on Immokalee Road without a MAJOR change in Road infrastructure such as a multi - particular intersection. Collier Blvd and the north Naples area in general. At least At least At least At least friend, lane, multi -level freeway. Is THAT what the Collier County Development wants this Immokalee Road would be a better place I cannot even imagine what this once a once a once a once a Year -Round neighbor, area to look like???? The improvements being suggested are like "putting perfume 12523835864 3/26/21 to do this, if it isn't already planned. INo 1configuration would do ..... 1%6t�l I 1week 1week 1week lEveryday 1week IYes INo I Resident etc.... Ion a pig", to write to quote my husband! Respondent Question Question 5 Question Question Start Date Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 a. b. C. d. ID 4 6 7 Seasonal Direct Resident notification Less Less (temporary from HOA, than Less than Less than Less than than residence at friend, once a once a once a once a once a least 1 month neighbor, 12523740357 3/26/21 1 think it is a great idea No Ido it good idea month month imonth month month Yes INo per year) etc.... The issue on Logan is the volume of use and speed,the Immokalee / Logan intersection is not an issue, is it Logan blvd Why are we not putting in both Sensible growth per acre developed HAS to be part of this discussion as road It seems to work at GGP and APR but is minimum lot sizes on new directions At least At least At least volume will never keep pace with population growth no matter how much we try. there really adequate space for that type developments in order to control and Every once a once a once a Year -Round We must discuss limiting density and Developers MUST pay their fair share of these 12523716503 3/26/21 of overpass? No Itraffic volumes? speeders. day week 1week Every day week Yes IYes Resident Social media improvements! I don't believe this is necessary on Livingston. The overpass should be This will be way too confusing for At least At least At least At least At least connecting immokalee since that is the the general population and the Way too once a once a once a once a once a Year -Round 12523643421 3/26/21 high traffic road. Yes older community. confusing. week week week week week Yes No Resident Social media Don't make people drive in oncoming directions, it is confusing and too complex. At least I don't Every once a Every Year -Round 12523570423 3/26/21 know day Every day Every day week day Yes No Resident Social media At least At least At least At least Every once a once a once a once a Year -Round 12523555215 3/26/21 No day month month week month Yes No Resident Social media At least At least At least At least At least once a once a once a once a once a Year -Round 12523344208 3/25/21 No week week week week week No No Resident Social media I have family in Sarasota and I drive through the University diamond frequently. It does help although the format is very confusing when driving thru (I am 28 y/o) - so I imagine elderly traffic thru this diamond could cause some concerns. I have no idea how much it helps in the If it will be similar to the Golden gate end or if there are any real Every Every Year -Round 12523323608 3/25/211 overpass then that is great. IYes I accident concerns. I No commentl day lEveryday lEveryday lEveryday Jday IYes Yes Resident ISocial media Respondent Question Question 5 Question Question Start Date Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 a. b. C. d. ID 4 6 7 With the increased usage of Logan Blvd, why not utilize an overpass approach on day 1, rather than this Seasonal approach Resident now and (temporary Can't you do the overpass on Immokalee potentially At least At least At least At least At least residence at Road (E-W traffic). It seems like that is It flows well once people are an overpass once a once a once a once a once a least 1 month 12523323089 3/25/21 the higher volume road. Yes lused to it. Signage is important. later? week week week 1week week No INo per year) Social media Every Every Year -Round 12523295835 3/25/21 Yes day Every day Every day Every day day No No Resident Social media Direct Also notification confusing from HOA, I think the elderly people will be for elderly At least At least At least friend, Will access to STT be worse, better or really confused.... But it will help maybe.... Every once a once a once a Year -Round neighbor, 12523295823 3/25/21 same.... Don't make it worse please Yes Ithe interchange move better. But I like it. day week week I Every day month No INo Resident etc.... About time! This is a very necessary. At least At least At least At least At least I don't once a once a once a once a once a Year -Round 12523200127 3/25/21 Looks good. know week week week month week No No Resident Social media Respondent Start Date Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question Question 5 Question Question Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 a. b. C. d. ID 4 6 7 The yield that is needed on these partial lanes will not ease traffic on Immokalee - it will cause more accidents as people try to gun it to get into ongoing traffic. In California Don't see how this helps anyone and other than those wanting to exit Washington and reenter i75 in the opposite states, they direction. It seems you would had to add still have lights stopping those on pacing lights Immokalee to accommodate to keep those exiting i75 in either people from direction to enter Immokalee doing this in If you are going to do major work on the roadways, please be considerate of the road and that's what causes the the feed traffic in season. Doing this kind of work in season and mostly during the day will Only modification in the overall study that current back ups - not anyone lane system At least At least create major hardships for people. Any plans should look at maximizing work to be might actually ease traffic significantly on trying to reenter the interstate in and it was a Every once a once a Every Year -Round done between May and September with nighttime work being a predominant 12523194610 3/25/21 Immokalee Road in my humble opinion. Yes the opposite direction. nightmare. day week week Every day day Yes INo Resident Social media strategy. Direct notification from HOA, Atleast Atleast At least friend, Every once a once a once a Year -Round neighbor, 12523142136 3/25/21 No Iday Every day week 1week week Yes INo Resident etc.... Atleast Atleast At least At least At least once a once a once a once a once a Year -Round 12522944484 3/25/21 Yes week week week week week No No Resident Social media We need entries/exits off of 1-75 on Vanderbilt Beach RD. This would greatly reduce the volume Direct on Immokalee and Pine Ridge Rd. notification Multiple right turn lanes from immokalee onto 1-75 when heading west on We could also greatly use from HOA, immokalee and going north on 175. A much longer approach onto 75 would help. frontage roads along 1-75. Almost friend, Alternating lights so cars would merge from these two lanes onto 75 would also all major cities have them, yet we Every Every Year -Round neighbor, help. Many cities use these stop&go lights to control the merging, alternating green 12522923626 3/25/21 No don't here in Lee/Collier counties. day Every day Every day Every day day Yes No Resident etc.... so one car at a time enters 75. Respondent Question Question 5 Question Question Start Date Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 a. b. C. d. ID 4 6 7 At least At least At least Less than At least Agree a right turn lane would reduce I don't once a once a once a once a once a Year -Round 12522904207 3/25/21 congestion significantly. know week week week month week No No Resident Social media Every Every Year -Round 12522756023 3/25/21 No day Every day Every day Every day day No No Resident Social media Seasonal Resident (temporary I live 7 months / year just outside the study area (Collier Blvd 1/4 mile South of I found this confusing in the one At least At least At least At least At least residence at Immokalee. I try to avoid that stretch as much as I can because of the traffic, both at 1-75 and University Pkwy, x 213 No once a once a once a once a once a least 1 month volume and speed differences. I support he suggestions provided and think they will 12522662624 3/25/21 This makes good sense to me. Yes referenced above. comment. week week week 1week week No IYes per year) Social media help. Being a resident of Riverstone, we're experiencing high levels of traffic (high truck usage) on Logan Blvd. My concern is driver confusion. Not sure if Direct Yet, something needs to be done additional notification since the right lane (westbound lights at this from HOA, Immokolee) for northbound 75 is interchange At least friend, The overpass is a great solution to often backed up to Logan in the are worth Every once a Every Year -Round neighbor, Please address the issues (noise and truck usage) on Logan Blvd between 12522641253 3/25/21 congestion at this intersection. Yes imornings. the benefits. day week Everyday lEveryday day No INo Resident etc.... Immokolee and Bonita Beach Rd. At least At least I don't Every once a once a Year -Round 12522622570 3/25/21 know day Every day Everyday week week Yes Yes Resident Social media Talking to folks who live up in Lee County, this intersection is very confusing The number of cars that will be traveling Immokalee Rd due to new buildings (Lexus the first dealer, Senior Center, businesses at 951 and Immokalee, new Charter School, new I like this option but backup also takes couple of At least At least developments along and off Immokalee) are going to compound the current place at the Walmart light. Need to Drove through one on 195 at times you Every once a once a Every Year -Round problems. I think it is too late already and what you are proposing are just 12522563226 3/25/211 better coordinate lights. IYes Yulee exit. It worked well. I drive it. Jday 1week lEveryday 1week Jday IYes INo lResident ISocial media lbandaids to the larger issue of uncontrolled growth along this corridor. Respondent Start. Date Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question Question 5 Question Question Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 a. b. C. d. ID 4 6 7 This will allow better flow of Increased congestion is also due to increased development in the Estates from traffic when entering/exiting the Immokalee Rd. Since Immokalee Rd is the only way to enter into that area of the highway. Would recommend 3 estates, and the only way to get to Immokalee and Ava Maria, the county needs to lanes to enter the highway that think about additional access points to these areas. Widening roads will only work would mimic the 3 lanes exiting for so long. There needs to be another exit off of 75 that will allow these residents the highway. We already have 2 At least to get to their homes without clogging up the Immokalee Rd exit. Think about 5-10 This is perfect. Lots of turn lanes will allow lanes to enter the highway and Every once a Every Year -Round years from now, our population will triple. These are great ideas, but they are only 12522459813 3/25/21 better flow of traffic. Yes it's not enough. day Everyday lEveryday week day Yes lNo Resident Social media bandaids to the real problem. Seasonal Resident (temporary At least At least At least At least At least residence at I don't Lots of driver education and good once a once a once a once a once a least 1 month Very glad there is work underway to make improvements. It is definitely needed as 12522399670 3/25/21 know Isignage will be needed. week week week lweek week No lNo per year) Social media the traffic is consistently getting worse. Any improvement is great - but don't forget all of Immokalee Road -from 951 to 41. The problem is all the developments planned east of 951 that I had to put down an average of at least once a week - how about adding several will use Immokalee Road -the villages times a month - your survey is a bit weak in surveying frequency - Help is needed planned between Ave Maria and 951 will looks confusing but if it works At least At least At least At least At least immediately - anyone living east of 951 uses Immokalee all the time. Do not add have a huge impact - please keep the that is great - this area needs once a once a once a once a once a Year -Round huge villages east of 951 until you build roads to support them. Do not turn us into 12522367655 3/25/211 Rural Stewardship design in mind. lNo I help now! Iweek lweek week lweek lweek lNo lNo lResident ISocial media la Miami! Respondent Start Date Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question Question 5 Question Question Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 a. b. C. d. ID 4 6 7 skipped the target light which is so poorly There are too many tourists and timed on old people down here for that immokalee type of intersection. I am under that 40 and found it confusing in everyone Sarasota. I do think it works, but slows to would be dangerous for naples. stop before Also, you skipped any suggestions it changes. for juliet... without including that They are timing and layout in your study, also often in that whole cluster will continue. the wrong People slow to a crawl before lane due to getting in the left turn lanes, and poor /late the turn lights and crosswalks are signage on Please take into consideration the fact that tourists don't know where they are all sequential, making Juliet a the right going. They don't accelerate to the speed limit and often don't realize they are very problematic intersection. turn lane approaching their intersection. Additional (larger) signage would be helpful, as That slowdown is then that would different timing on the lights during season and off season. One other exacerbated at 75 where you are extends thing: having sensor triggered lights between the major intersections that are not The lights are so poorly timed from guaranteed to miss the light due from 75 to timed with the primary lights cause major traffic all over town. A light sbouldnt turn Goodlettsville Frank, Airport, and The to the previous intersection. target. A immediately for a side community or lesser light if the major flow of traffic has a Lane, that all hope is lost by the time you Coming from the west, juliet displaced green light. This happens on pine ridge, Vanderbilt and immokalee all the time. I get to Livingston. This study needs to causes the same issues with the left turn used to live on The Lane near Livingston and immokallee and moved 5 years ago start at 41 and go out to clients if you continuous right turn from the 75 seems due to the congestion, after being rear ended .5 miles from home at a red light. I want to solve the root causes of the exit into the publix plaza (poorly reasonable avoid immokalee at all costs and am really glad something is being done about it. congestion. Additionally, why would signed, people cut in last minute) for the Has any though been given to turning it into a full cross town highway from 75 to livingston be raised? Immokalee should plus people cut over to the left logan At least At least At least At least At least 41? Or another road for the same purpose? Since moving to the estates my travel get the free flow from that, just like for the walmart left turn, making intersection, once a once a once a once a once a Year -Round time to 41 has doubled. Thank you for implementing this project and making our 12522359206 3/25/21 golden gate does over airport. Yes it a scramble of cars. but still fails week Iweek week week Iweek No No I Resident Social media roads more suitable for our community! clearly the county is putting a band -aid on a severed arm rarely works. Stay stupid and continue hiding only idiots would build too many full of a down here in south Florida where incompetence pays off. How many more people stop all the damn construction and maybe houses before having a plan to bunch of have to die in car accidents around here before you start recognizing you people 12522331027 3/25/21 we do not need shit like this Yes deal with the increased traffic idiots are to blame Less This isn't the main problem. Waste of This is the area to improve and At least At least At least than taxpayer money because the problem is would support any design that once a once a once a once a Year -Round 12522326790 3/25/21 mostly at the 175 interchange. No allows traffic to flow again week week week month No No Resident Social media Respondent Question Question 5 Question Question Start. Date Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 a. b. C. d. ID 4 6 7 The Continuous Flow Intersection at Daniels and 82 is excellent. I think this would work What? You've got it backwards! Make well here Immokalee pass over Livingston. Like the for extra intersection of Summerlin Rd and San I think this would be incredible. flow on Build an elevated, chain link enclosed, toll road from Bonita Beach Rd to Immokalee Carlos Blvd in Ft Myers. Immokalee needs I'm very familiar with the one at Immokalee Every Every Year -Round near Oil Well. The dead zone with boundaries of 1-75, Immokalee Rd, SR-29, 5E-82, 12522323409 3/25/21 more flow, Livingston has plenty. Yes University Pkwy. rd. day Everyday lEveryday Every day day No INo Resident Social media and Corkscrew Rd, is just too large. Elevate and enclose to protect wildlife. Seasonal Direct The study is very important... I'm an 8 month resident. The traffic continues to get Resident notification worse and worse. Collier needs to be opened to go north, and all the major Less (temporary from HOA, intersections need to be worked on. I travel Livingston to Immokolee every day and than At least Less than residence at friend, both turn lanes to get onto immokalee in either direction are always all stacked up, Can be very confusing... for once a once a once a Every least 1 month neighbor, especially in the am 8:30am and pm after 3... it takes at least two to three lights to 12522300725 3/25/21 Sounds great!!! Yes Ivisitors and elderly month Every day week imonth day No INo per year) etc.... get through the turn Very Confusing - How does At least At least At least At least Very Confusing - How does this this improve once a once a once a once a Year -Round 12522224108 3/25/21 No improve traffic flow? traffic flow? week week week Every day week No No Resident Social media Traffic is overwhelming during Season! At least At least At least At least I don't once a once a once a once a Year -Round 12522192346 3/25/21 know week week week week No No Resident Social media At least At least I don't Every once a once a Every Year -Round 12522168880 3/25/21 know day week week Every day day No No Resident Social media Seasonal Resident (temporary At least Less than At least residence at once a once a once a least 1 month Email 12522151698 3/25/211 IYes I I I lEveryday Imonth Imonth 1week IYes INo I per year) inotification IThe traffic is very frustrating Respondent Question Question 5 Question Question Start Date Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 a. b. C. d. ID 4 6 7 We need a watch for bicycles in this area, there a lots It's congested turning left onto of kids that immokalee towards 75, triple lanes could ride to and help but the bumper to bumper and from gulf constant cut offs from people not paying coast high attention will just cause more fender school and Thank you for considering this area for traffic changes. It take roughly 15 minutes to benders, please add marking and signs to adults riding At least At least At least get from valewood to Livingston between the 8-930a and 4-530p. The shopping identify turning lanes back from the along here once a once a once a Every Year -Round centers adding more are adding more congestion, so anything would be an 12522122479 3/25/21 intersections Yes as well week week Every day 1week day Yes INo Resident Social media improvement since it's just getting worse. Every Every Year -Round 12522070337 3/25/21 day Every day Every day day Yes No Resident Social media Direct notification from HOA, At least At least At least At least At least friend, once a once a once a once a once a Year -Round neighbor, 1252198774413/25/21 Yes Iweek week week 1week week No INo Resident etc.... Every Every Year -Round 12521973027 3/25/21 day Every day Every day Every day day No No Resident Social media What about going east to west with the overpass? That was most of the traffic on Every Every Year -Round 12521966608 3/25/21 Immokalee road wouldn't have to stop. Yes day Every day Every day Every day day No No Resident Social media Every Every Year -Round 12521936993 3/25/21 agree No day Every day Every day Every day day Yes No Resident Social media At least At least At least Every once a once a once a Year -Round 12521897355 3/25/21 Good plan No Good concept No comment day week week Every day week No No Resident Social media Think this is a great idea. Immokolee between Logan and Livingston is an At least At least At least At least At least absolute nightmare to travel between! I once a once a once a once a once a Year -Round 12521847162 3/25/21 avoid it at all cost if I can. No week week week week week No No Resident Social media We need the best outcome for traffic in this area. I don't Every Year -Round 12521846177 3/25/21 know Every day Every day day Yes No Resident Social media Direct notification from HOA, At least friend, Every once a Every Year -Round neighbor, We have more than enough traffic on Immokolee. Adding more development east 12521839050 3/25/211 IYes I I Jday lEveryday lEveryday 1week Jday IYes INo I Resident etc.... lof 175 is making it worse every year !!! Respondent Question Question 5 Question Question Start Date Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 a. b. C. d. ID 4 6 7 At least At least At least At least At least once a once a once a once a once a Year -Round 12521516586 3/25/21 Yes. Yes Yes. week week week week month No No Resident Social media Every Every Year -Round 12521182601 3/25/21 Yes day Every day Every day Every day day Yes No Resident Social media At least At least At least Every once a once a once a Year -Round 12521134028 3/25/21 Sounds good No day week week Every day week No Yes Resident Social media Extend the study to Immokalee and Collier intersection. Every Every Year -Round 12521128387 3/25/21 Please do it Yes Please do it Please do it day Every day Every day Every day day No No Resident Social media At least At least At least At least Every once a once a once a once a Year -Round 12521122076 3/25/21 No day week week week week No No Resident Social media This is a heavy residential area with two 800+ households. Both developmen is have only ONE exit, which are onto Logan. In an emergency, this could be catastrophic especially if traffic is diverted from Immokalee. Please Seasonal consider Resident this during (temporary your At least At least Atleast Atleast Atleast residence at planning once a once a once a once a once a least 1 month 12521114070 3/25/211 1 1 1 efforts. 1week Imonth Imonth 1week 1week IYes INo I per year) ISocial media jWhy isn't extending Collier to Bonita Springs under consideration? Respondent Question Question 5 Question Question Start Date Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 a. b. C. d. ID 4 6 7 As someone who has a part-time home in Naples, this intersection With more is a necessity. With excessive developmen traffic in season and the volume t in this area of senior citizen drivers and plus the people from out of state who are additional unfamiliar with the excessive developmen speeds, lack of medians t at Collier separating opposite lanes of and traffic and confusing turn lanes, I Immokalee, strongly encourage you to it will simplify this plan or at minimum, undoubtedly provide plenty of signage in bring even Seasonal advance of the interchange. more Resident Sadly, I lost my father to a car congestion, (temporary crash in Naples. Safety is more glad you are At least At least At least At least At least residence at important, when dealing with planning once a once a once a once a once a least 1 month 12521102861 3/25/21 No Ithese congestion issues. ahead. week week week 1week month Yes IYes per year) Social media At least At least At least At least At least once a once a once a once a once a Year -Round Any improvement to lessen the congestion is greatly appreciated! Also please keep 12521067106 3/25/21 week week week week week Yes No Resident Social media in mind that bicycles need a safe space to ride too. Every Every Year -Round 12521060786 3/25/21 No day Every day Every day Every day day Yes Yes Resident Social media The partial displaced turns are great, keeps traffic If this works like the intersection of moving Airport Road and Golden Gate Parkway, I By the model it looks like traffic is while believe this will help. More volume of moved with more cars at once. drivers look At least At least At least At least At least traffic is able to move especially if I don't The turn offs to the 75 look well only one once a once a once a once a once a Year -Round 12521049019 3/25/21 Immokalee Road is the raised road. know in place for continued traffic Iway. imonth imonth imonth imonth imonth No INo lResident Isocial media Respondent Start. Date Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question Question 5 Question Question Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 a. b. C. d. ID 4 6 7 This is the intersection where I live (Riverstone). I don't have any problems with the current left turn setup. It seems to work relatively well. My biggest problem is exiting Logan in the AM turning right onto Immokalee With intersections so close to 75 westbound. and multi -named (The An entrance Strand/Juliet & ramp of Northbrook/Tarpon Bay) you will about 40 A good bit of the traffic appears to be coming from towns east of Collier Blvd. A need notations in the lanes to yards would Every Every Year -Round more proactive effort would be another north/south corridor connecting Alligator 12521042520 3/25/21 No Iassist COT drivers. be helpful. day Every day Everyday lEveryday day Yes INo Resident Social media Alley to north of the Caloosahatchee (sp) At least At least At least At least At least I don't once a once a once a once a once a Year -Round 12521040387 3/25/21 know week month month week week No No Resident Social media Never used this set up but their has to be a better way for cars to get up to speed faster on to 75. This interchange gets backed up because it's takes way to long to merge onto 75. Slow the growth Remove and new building past 951 before stop sign at At least you figure this out might also entrance of Every once a Every Year -Round 12521035092 3/25/21 No I help. olde cypress day Every day 1week Every day day Yes INo Resident Social media What about Heritage greens neighborhood. We can not exit because of traffic. Help us!!!! If you do an overpass we taking more risks exiting, Stop development going east. Immokalee Road and Vanderbilt Beach Road are the someone is going to be seriously injured Not the answer to residents with only east west roads and they are at capacity. Do a study at the entrance to Laurel here. With the school next to our exit and only one exit from the Heritage Oaks and Gulf Coast High. Making a dangerous intersection worse with this plan. the light a exit, there is an accident almost Greens Community new will Every Every Year -Round Study area not a quick fix that generates more problems. Get in your cars at 3 and 12521018522 3/25/21 daily. INo I never be able to exit I Iday lEveryday I I Iday IYes IYes lResident Isocial media 1head east. Experience is the best study!! Respondent Start Date Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question Question 5 Question Question Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 a. b. C. d. ID 4 6 7 1 like the idea however would like to understand the extended wait time. I can only imagine the At least Less than At least I like the suggested improvements. One of the biggest problems is the blocking of accidents as people speed once a once a once a Every Year -Round intersections. I work off of Valewood and cannot get out of Valewood in the 12520942121 3/25/21 Yes through week month Every day week day No Yes Resident Social media afternoon due to constant traffic in the intersection .... during season only. Consideration should be given to the traffic SB from Livingston turning East on Immokalee Road. The proposed changes will not keep traffic from blocking this insect ion but may further the issue since through traffic will be of no consequence to those stopped in the intersection to avoid having to wait out the light. This is a potential hazard to Emergency Vehicles as well at present. While it is exaggerated during season it still a problem during the off season. Proactive measures should be taken in consideration of the new housing developments under and slated for At least At least Collier construction on the North side of Every once a once a Year -Round County 12520923416 3/25/21 Livingston Rd. day Every day week Every day week No IYes Resident website This is long overdue, thankful it is finally being addressed. At least Collier Every once a Every Year -Round County Frequently cars turning left off Immokalee rd to 75N block Immokalee Rd especially 12520910301 3/25/21 Yes day Every day Every day week day Yes Yes Resident website between 4 & 6:30 pm. Need police to help with traffic control. Collier Every Every Year -Round County 12520907585 3/25/21 Yes day Every day Every day Every day day No No Resident website At least Collier Every once a Year -Round County Could a new on and off ramp at Vanderbilt Beach road and i-75 reduce the traffic at 12520907531 3/25/21 day Every day Every day Every day week Yes No Resident website Immokalee and i-75 by 30%? 1 don't Every Every Year -Round 12520907193 3/25/21 know day Everyday Everyday Every day day No No Resident Social media At least Every once a Year -Round 12520899452 3/25/21 Agree Yes day Every day Every day Every day week Yes Yes Resident Social media Why not do one of the continuous circle loops where Partial traffic entering and exiting 1-75 continuous At least At least While this may improve traffic it sure will never has to stop as it can flow flow makes Every once a once a Year -Round 12520886520 3/25/21 Miami'fy, Naples! Yes freely? more sense day Every day week Every day week No Yes Resident Social media Respondent Start Date Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question Question 5 Question Question Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 a. b. C. d. ID 4 6 7 1 don't think the problem is going to be relieved with Livingston having an overpass over Immokalee Rd. The problem is making the right or left turn off of Livingston onto Immokalee Rd. The first problem is the light at the preserve and Juliet Blvd next problem is the lights at 75. Traffic is backing up on Immokalee Rd because of the North Bound ramp for 75 especially during peak hours! I'm not convinced spending money on a flyover is the best alternative for this problem. I Every Every Year -Round 12520858564 3/25/21 think further studies need to be done! No day Every day Everyday lEveryday day No INo Resident Social media At least At least Seemingly works well Golden gate and once a once a Every Year -Round 12520849100 3/25/21 Airport No week Every day week Every day day Yes No Resident Social media I think this would be helpful but I am At least worried about what traffic would be like Every once a Every Year -Round 12520827984 3/25/21 while the overpass is being built. No day week Every day Every day day No No Resident Social media Recommend ation would help with night or out Direct This seems reasonable. Side note, there is of season notification also concern with traffic heading north on construction from HOA, Livingston where the new GGG high to help At least friend, school will be built, that can get very with Every once a Every Year -Round neighbor, 12520806624 3/25/21 heavy during 5 o'clock rush hour No Icongestion. day week Everyday lEveryday day No INo Resident etc.... I don't know of the This would be great, as long as it handles 100%this would do wonders immediate At least At least the heavy merging traffic in during rush once people grow accustomed to need for Every once a once a Year -Round 12520776742 3/25/21 hours. Please take that into account Yes it this. day Every day Every day week week No No Resident Social media Seasonal Direct It worked well for us in Resident notification Lexington, Kentucky. Alleviated (temporary from HOA, congestion, allowing traffics to At least residence at friend, flow smoothly, and reduction in Every once a Every least 1 month neighbor, 12520762469 3/25/21 Yes laccident. day Everyday lEveryday month day IYes Yes per year) etc.... I think the issue is more about the northbound, right turn than going north. The traffic north of immokalee will still bottleneck by Mediterra, south of Bonita Reducing the traffic one light Every Every Year -Round 12520752767 3/25/21 Beach Road. Yes should help. day Everyday Everyday Everyday day Yes No Resident Social media Respondent Question Question 5 Question Question Start Date Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 a. b. C. d. ID 4 6 7 1 feel like this would be great for Immokolee road congestion at that light. I feel like Livingston road isn't overly busy At least At least At least At least At least I live off golden gate blvd and take 175 north to work. I always take the pine ridge but it might make Immokolee drive more once a once a once a once a once a Year -Round road exit/on ramp due to the congestion during rush hour. Any improvements 12520752636 3/25/21 smooth. No Looks good! week week month month month No No Resident Social media would be great! Direct notification from HOA, friend, Every Every Year -Round neighbor, 12520751366 3/25/21 1 think this would be very helpful No day Every day Everyday lEveryday day No INo Resident etc.... At least At least At least At least At least I don't once a once a once a once a once a Year -Round 12520750558 3/25/21 Good idea know Good idea week week week week week No No Resident Social media No I don't Direct understand notification I don't understand from the the diagram from HOA, diagram what would change and and how it At least At least At least friend, how it would positively impact will impact Every once a once a once a Year -Round neighbor, 12520698235 3/25/21 No Ithe traffic flow traffic. day week week I Every day week Yes IYes Resident etc.... Not sure what this means. Due to covid, I have not been driving as much as I used to and don't plan on getting up to 82/Daniels Pkwy. to see At least At least At least I don't the Every once a once a once a Year -Round Email Very concerned about the traffic at Logan/Immokalee. How will this affect the 12520689150 3/25/21 know intersection. day week week Every day week Yes INo Resident notification traffic at Treeline, especially when we are looking to put in a roundabout? Direct notification from HOA, At least friend, I don't Every once a Year -Round neighbor, 12520663069 3/25/21 know day Everyday Everyday lEveryday week Yes INo Resident etc.... At least Every once a Every Year -Round 12520654520 3/24/21 Overpass Yes Looks ok day week Every day Every day day No No Resident Social media Get it done quickly Respondent Question Question 5 Question Question Start Date Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 a. b. C. d. ID 4 6 7 At least At least At least At least At least once a once a once a once a once a Year -Round 12520644244 3/25/21 Yes week week week week month No No Resident Social media At least Every once a Every Year -Round 12520601865 3/25/21 No day Every day Every day week day Yes Yes Resident Social media I hope this works. I avoid this At least At least At least area as much as I can even Every once a once a once a Year -Round 12520599418 3/25/21 No Yes though it's the most direct route. No day week week Every day week No No Resident Social media At least At least At least At least once a once a once a once a Year -Round The study should not be between Logan and Livingston. It should extend to Collier 12520581832 3/25/21 week week week month No No Resident Social media Blvd. At least At least At least At least At least once a once a once a once a once a Year -Round 12520579459 3/25/21 Support recommendation Yes week month week week week No No Resident Social media Seasonal Direct Resident notification (temporary from HOA, At least At least Less than residence at friend, once a once a once a Every least 1 month neighbor, 12520544792 3/25/21 Makes sense Yes Makes sense week month imonth Every day day Yes INo per year) etc.... Looks like a multi -year project that will degrade service level until complete. There are constant accidents on State Rd. 82. 1 don't know if it is at the intersection, but it is It looks very confusing, especially cause for Every Every Year -Round We do need the bridge at Strand Blvd. widened to three lanes on the west side, one 12520542990 3/25/21 An overpass would help tremendously! No at night! concern. day Every day Everyday lEveryday day Yes INo Resident Social media left, one right and one straight! At least At least At least Less than Construction takes a long time but may be once a once a once a once a Every Year -Round 12520491713 3/25/21 worth it No Might make it safer month week week month day Yes Yes Resident Social media Safety first Is this Direct sufficient notification considering from HOA, Anything to reduce backup on completion At least At least At least At least At least friend, Pedestrian Bridge across Livingston for exit 111 South should be a of Valencia once a once a once a once a once a Year -Round neighbor, 12520479519 3/25/21 S2T traffic. IYes I priority. Trails? 1week 1week 1week 1week 1week INo INo I Resident etc.... I Expedite the process as much as possible. Respondent Question Question 5 Question Question Start Date Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 a. b. C. d. ID 4 6 7 At least At least At least once a once a once a Every Year -Round Email 12520461537 3/25/21 Yes week week week Every day day Yes No Resident notification At least Every once a Every Year -Round Email 12520416795 3/25/21 Great idea day Every day week Every day day Yes No Resident notification People use Vanderbilt to get off At least At least At least At least At least Naples had a personality. You destroyed it on Immokalee and 951 now. It once a once a once a once a once a Year -Round Email 12520414196 3/25/21 with over building. No will only get worse. week week month month month Yes No Resident notification STOP BUILDING. YOU ARE RUINING NAPLES. Takes some getting used to. Will probably have to field a lot of complaints from motorists who profess not to understand it. At least At least Less than At least Actually, more efficient than it once a once a once a once a Year -Round 12520407150 3/24/21 In favor of this improvement. Yes looks at first glance. month Every day 1week month month No No Resident Social media Perhaps a press release would get further distribution. Anything that will reduce the car races up and down Immokalee Rd would be much appreciated. Direct And of notification course from HOA, Thank you for trying to improve the traffic flow on Immokalee rd. Is there anything improvemen At least friend, that can be done to reduce the traffic noise for homes that back up to or are near is to traffic Every once a Year -Round neighbor, Immokalee Rd? Paris Smith-Higbie 2446 Butterfly Palm Dr. 12520363907 3/25/21 No No INo flow. day Everyday Everyday lEveryday week Yes INo Resident etc.... psmithhigbie@gmail.com 614-271-6140 At least At least At least At least At least once a once a once a once a once a Year -Round 12520351818 3/25/21 No week week week week week No No Resident Social media Logan Blvd from Immokale rd north to Bonita Beach Road should NOT ALLOW At least heavy truck traffic. It is a 2 lane rd through residential areas and use by heavy Every once a Year -Round trucking is extremely noisy and dangerous. Signs should be posted indicating NO 12520338451 3/25/21 day Every day Every day Every day week Yes No Resident Social media THRU TRUCKINGH Respondent Question Question 5 Question Question Start Date Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 a. b. C. d. ID 4 6 7 Icannot figure out how this will help. Maybe I don't really understand it. It seems like the left turn people have to go through 2 lights to turn left?? This seems like it's going to be a train- We live just east of GCHS, so just out of the 1-mile area. There needs to be other wreck and ways to get north. The Logan extension helps some, but now there will be all the additional construction on Bonita Beach Road near or east of Logan. I have had tourists and times where it has taken 45 minutes or longer to go from GCHS to 1-75 north of Hopefully it won't be ugly. It would be Seems like a good idea. Drove a snowbirds At least At least At least Bonita Beach Road. Stop letting new subdivisions and towns be developed east of (- nice to make it easier to get in and out of DID in Michigan, odd the first will make a Every once a once a once a Year -Round 75. The traffic is already terrible. Sometimes I have to sit for up to 5 minutes to get 12520336948 3/25/21 Seed to Table. Yes Itime, but it worked well. mess of it. day week week I Every day week No INo Resident Social media out of Laurel Lakes, if no one is there to trigger the light at GCHS. At least At least Every once a once a Every Year -Round Email It's all good. Much needed to help with growing traffic congestion in these areas 12520291956 3/25/21 1 like it. Yes Like it. Like it day week week Every day day Yes Yes Resident notification especially Immokalee Road! At least At least At least At least At least I don't once a once a once a once a once a Year -Round 12520264084 3/25/21 know week week month week week No No Resident Social media I'm not sure the expense is worth it. It's hard to figure out the first At least At least Collier More problems further out on Immokalee few times. Different from what Every once a once a Every Year -Round County Thank you! It is really needed since they continue to build further out Immokalee 12520237563 3/25/21 Rd. Yes everyone is used to. day Every day week month day Yes No Resident website Rd. At least At least At least Every once a once a once a Every Year -Round 12520231577 3/25/21 No day week week week day Yes No Resident Social media A better explanation of this concept is required and details Again, provided to residents and greater For all: this study is at least three years seasonal on how to traverse, explanation At least At least At least behind in dealing with traffic on these otherwise I see it being a real is needed to Every once a once a once a Year -Round Email First step to relieve congestion is place moratorium on housing construction and 12520218844 3/25/211 roads. Too little too late!! INo Istop point. lunderstand. Jday 1week 1week lEveryday 1week Yes INo I Resident I notification allow road construction to proceed. Closing lanes will cause more traffic issues. Respondent Question Question 5 Question Question Start Date Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 a. b. C. d. ID 4 6 7 1 do not agree with this type of intersection from a life safety perspective. There have Even with the projected been noted efficiencies of the DDI, this only increases in This does not address the THOUSANDS of addresses the short term needs. crashes and At least Collier folks at Seed To Table and their need to A plan for the longer term is still fatalities by Every once a Every Year -Round County The fact that you took the option of expanding Immokalee Road off the table is 12520209029 3/25/21 head South or East. Yes ineeded. using these. day Everyday lEveryday week day No Yes lResident website outrageous. Using pilings to extend over the canal should be considered. If we could get fly over ramps before the lights at strand and valewood to get on 75 it seems like that would alleviate a lot of issues, going straight east or west only At least At least At least seems congested because of everyone trying to get on an already backed up i75. Every once a once a once a Year -Round Seems like the bigger issue is the MM 116 and 123 interchanges causing gridlock on 12520203855 3/25/21 No day week week Every day week No No Resident Social media 75 Going to be an extremely busy intersection. This will probably be too little too late by the time it At least At least At least would be Every once a once a once a Year -Round They very much need to take into account all of the growth/traffic coming east on 12520202496 3/25/21 Sounds very expensive. Yes finished. day week week Every day week No INo Resident Social media immokalee rd Collier Every Every Year -Round County 12520173548 3/25/21 Yes day Every day Every day Every day day No Yes Resident website At least I'd like to see pedestrian bridges over Immokalee at Northbrooke Dr and Logan I don't Every once a Every Year -Round Blvd. It's dangerous to cross Immokalee for people walking to the stores and 12520128637 3/25/21 know day Every day week Every day day Yes No Resident Social media restaurants. At least At least Every once a once a Year -Round 12520081317 3/25/21 Yes day week Every day Every day week No Yes Resident Social media The sooner the better to approve and complete these projects. At least At least At least At least At least once a once a once a once a once a Year -Round 12520075293 3/25/21 No week week week month week No No Resident Social media Respondent Question Question 5 Question Question Start Date Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 a. b. C. d. ID 4 6 7 1 don't At least At least At least understand Every once a once a once a Year -Round It should consider issues further east on Immokalee and including Collier and 12520069767 3/25/21 Yes They are very confusing! this concept day Every day week week month No No Resident Social media further down east with all the new development happening as well. Excellent, Yes, complete this asap or you will have this road is residents began to leave the area. Major used and major traffic accidents, frequent major dangerous bus stops letting children off construction on the corners of immokalee and and traffic livingston. already waiting 3-4 light already Every Every Year -Round 12520051708 3/25/21 changes to go east on immokalee Yes Icomplete asap exists day Everyday lEveryday Every day day Yes IYes Resident Social media Facebook post from someone sharing Less Less than Atleast Atleast Less than than It might help keep things moving. But will once a once a once a once a once a Year -Round 12520038366 3/25/21 it make it hard to get into the stores? Yes Love it month week week month month No No Resident Social media recommend ed improvemen is for this intersection impact dead-end streets West of Logan Blvd. exiting/enter ing Immokalee Rd? We live in Heritage Greens and its a horror show when we try to enter Immokalee Rd. from Heritage Greens Drive, especially if Seasonal we want to Resident make a U (temporary I am assuming that this study takes into account the massive growth planned for turn at At least At least Less than Atleast residence at Collier Ave Maria and other planned eastern Collier County communities. Also, why not Preserve Ln. once a once a once a once a least 1 month County expand the study to westward to include the intersection of Immokalee Road and 12520036924 3/25/211 1 1 land go week imonth month lEveryday Imonth IYes INo I per year) 1website lCollier Blvd. Respondent Start Date Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question Question 5 Question Question Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 a. b. C. d. ID 4 6 7 It appears it will make right turns Direct onto notification Immokalee from HOA, Road easier At least At least friend, It works fine. It's a little strange with the Every once a once a Year -Round neighbor, 12520012002 3/25/21 Yes I at first, but really no problem. merge lanes. day week week Every day Yes INo Resident etc.... It sounds good. Something needs to be done, so I'm in favor of the effort. I don't see how this will help to convey east/westbound traffic more efficiently. It would seem that the overpass should be east/west over Livingston, like GG Every Every Year -Round 12519998228 3/25/21 Parkway over Airport. Yes day Every day Every day Every day day No No Resident Social media Every Every Year -Round 12519977192 3/25/21 Do it. Yes It's great. Do it. day Every day Every day Every day day No No Resident Social media Every Every Year -Round Email I saw a double stop light in Sarasota at a thruway over pass that helped traffic move 12519972192 3/25/21 Great idea Yes Great idea Great idea day Every day Every day Every day day Yes Yes Resident notification faster Congestion at 75 is horrible and if there is an accident your day is over Need a way to take a left turn out of Seed At least At least At least At least At least to Table in lieu of a u-turn in heavy traffic once a once a once a once a once a Year -Round 12519950830 3/25/21 off Livingston or Immokalee. No week week week week week No No Resident Social media At least Every once a Every Year -Round 12519929441 3/25/21 Yes day Every day Every day week day Yes Resident Social media DDI's work great and would At least At least At least Any improvements, including the ones considered, would help in alleviating definitely cut down on once a once a once a Year -Round Email congestion, more homes and strip malls are being built, it'll get worse before it'll 12519927415 3/25/21 Yes congestion! week week Every day week Yes No Resident notification get better unless traffic patterns are improved! This does not make sense. There is simply too much developmen t east of this Direct intersection notification It seems to make accessing Seed To Table for any from HOA, You are addressing the wrong problem. Immokalee Road cannot handle the more difficult and dangerous than it It was confusing and very solution to At least At least At least friend, increasing demand to get to 175. Vanderbilt Beach Road must have access to 75 already is. Suspect that maybe one of the congested. Especially for tourists handle Every once a once a once a Year -Round neighbor, and Collier Blvd must access it. Development East of Collier Blvd must stop until 12519923481 3/25/211 objectives. IYes I and visitors. jeffectively. Jday 1week 1week lEveryday 1week IYes INo I Resident etc.... Ithose changes are made. Respondent Question Question 5 Question Question Start Date Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 a. b. C. d. ID 4 6 7 No recommend ation but I do believe Immokalee rd between Logan & Airport is way too congested most of the day. Turn lanes are too short forthe amount of people turning so it Immokalee rd is & always has been a mess. The intersection at Livingston & blocks Immokalee rd is absolutely horrible during season. Sometimes you miss the lights in That intersection definitely need some straight lane At least At least At least At least the turn lane turning onto Immokalee rd due to the straight lanes clogging it up. It work. I think the overpass would be a I don't traffic from once a once a once a once a Year -Round has been so bad that I won't take Livingston home from Bonita (work) anymore. 12519923140 3/25/21 great idea know moving week Every day week 1week week No No Resident Social media You spend alot of time waiting on lights o congestion to clear to make a light. This looks like it would create more accidents than it would prevent. Immokalee rd has enough deaths and traffic delays from vehicle crashes on a straight road, and now you're going to At least At least At least At least At least Collier add crossovers traffic to a head once a once a once a once a once a Year -Round County 12519900651 3/25/21 Looks pretty good. No Ion collision? week week week 1week week Yes INo Resident website It looks a bit confusing but I think eventually people would learn to use it. We have a high population of elderly people and I think things with twist and turns Every Every Year -Round No. Just a suggestion, Tamiami tail road needs to be worked on. There are so 12519889062 3/25/21 INo jare going to be hard for them. Iday lEveryday lEveryday lEveryday Iday INo INo lResident ISocial media Imany bumps and holes that eventually wear down our cars. Thank you Respondent Question Question 5 Question Question Start Date Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 a. b. C. d. ID 4 6 7 Westbound Immokalee Rd. traffic should have a better entrance to Logan Landings as opposed to can the proposed hardscaped forcing medians (grey hatch) be them to At least At least converted to additional enter via Every once a once a Every Year -Round 12519858515 3/24/21 No No greenspace/pervious? Logan. day week week Every day day No IYes Resident Social media At least Every once a Every Year -Round 12519853036 3/25/21 No. Yes No No. day week Every day Every day day Yes No Resident Social media If leaving seed to table and trying to go east on immokalee road will you be able to turn left at the intersection? Right now you have to come out and go north on Coming from the estates it is very difficult in the morning as the only route to 75 is Livingston, make a u turn, and then take a No I think At least At least At least At least immokalee road. There are many morning that I have to leave very early to left at the light. Not sure how that will I don't that makes Every once a once a once a once a Year -Round accommodate for traffic. As more people move east the traffic is only going to get 12519834636 3/24/21 work with the change know sense day week 1week week week INo No Resident Social media more difficult to control. I definitely feel that changes need to be made Every Every Year -Round 12519810138 3/24/21 No day Every day Every day Every day day No No Resident Social media At least At least At least At least At least once a once a once a once a once a Year -Round 12519788758 3/24/21 No week week week week week No No Resident Social media At least At least At least At least once a once a once a once a Year -Round 12519788396 3/24/21 No week week Every day week week Yes No Resident Social media Is Logan going to be widened south of Immokalee? If not, then I don't see the need for NB traffic on Livingston making R onto These are confusing. Also the this. If so, At least Thank you for looking into this very congested area. I hope you are able to address Immokalee gets backed up. Is there space impact to traffic during then this Every once a Every Year -Round some of these issues before the additional developments off Immokalee past 12519765327 3/24/21 for 2 right turn lanes? IYes I construction is a major concern. Icould help Jday Imonth lEveryday lEveryday Jday INo INo lResident ISocial media Milson start to be built and inhabited. Respondent Question Question 5 Question Question Start Date Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 a. b. C. d. ID 4 6 7 At least At least Collier once a once a Every Year -Round County 12519755687 3/24/21 Every day week week day Yes Yes Resident website Strand Blvd. needs three lanes one left turn one right turn lastly a straight lane Year -Round 12519609645 3/24/21 1 oppose this Every day Yes No Resident Direct notification from HOA, At least At least At least friend, once a once a once a Every Year -Round neighbor, 12519490394 3/24/21 No Iweek Every day week 1week day Yes IYes Resident etc.... Drivers do not pay attention in Strongly oppose this. If anything, the this area. This looks very At least overpass should go East to West on confusing and could result in Every once a Every Year -Round 12519486889 3/24/21 Immokalee road, not North to South. Yes more accidents. day Every day Every day week day Yes Yes Resident Social media Consider other options to aid in East to West congestion, not North to South. So far, I like the idea of a Livingston Rd. overpass. n The triple turn left lanes on Livingston good idea as there is almost always a backup, any time of year but especially in season or if 75 has had an accident. Also, the added turn left lanes from Livingston going north are good - the At least At least At least single lane to turn left onto Immokalee is once a once a once a Year -Round 12519409567 3/24/21 woefully inadequate. No Every day month 1week week Yes INo Resident Social media Long overdue If I understand the concept Direct presented, We had something notification similar to this back in Columbus, from HOA, Ohio (Sawmill Road). It made a At least At least At least At least friend, huge difference and was well- once a once a once a once a Year -Round neighbor, 12519351178 3/24/21 Yes Ireceived. week week week Every day month No INo Resident etc.... Don't At least At least At least At least At least Sounds good, but minimize construction VERY confusing. Accidents understand once a once a once a once a once a Year -Round 12519326107 3/24/21 delays and complet4 the project quickly. Yes waiting to happen. the concept. week week week week week No No Resident Social media Thanks for asking. Respondent Question Question 5 Question Question Start Date Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 a. b. C. d. ID 4 6 7 You just spent a ton of money adding new turn lanes on Logan. If all the dump truck traffic was diverted off of Logan the amount of traffic at this intersection You still have traffic lights at Walmart With the elderly in this area.. I would Atleast Atleast You need to stop building new house in along Immokolee! That would help with area.. I don't think this will ease overall I don't can only see constant accidents decrease Every once a once a Year -Round congestion. Every home built East of Collier Rd has to commute on Immokolee to 12519210365 3/24/21 congestion in area know 1with this plan dramatically day Every day 1week Every day week IYes No Resident Social media Ido almost everything. Given all the new development you continue to approve, you can't do this fast enough! Are you considering the thousands of homes planned for east of this corridor? Has any consideration been given to 75/Vanderbilt interchanges or slip Every Every Year -Round ramps? It's absurd to think that we can consider these roads safe and commutable 12519187681 3/24/21 Yes day Every day Every day Every day day No No Resident Social media in the forseeable future with the band aids you are proposing. Something's got to give - do Every Every Year -Round 12519180094 3/24/21 No something fast! day Every day Every day day No No Resident Social media At least At least At least Atleast Atleast once a once a once a once a once a Year -Round 12519174135 3/24/21 No week week week week week Yes Yes Resident Social media At least At least Every once a once a Year -Round 12519160476 3/24/21 day Every day week Every day week Yes Yes Resident Social media Add interchange at 1-75 and Vanderbilt. Respondent Question Question 5 Question Question Start. Date Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 a. b. C. d. ID 4 6 7 1 use Logan everyday to travel for work. Leave it. I turn left off immoklee. Livingston is your issue and once through Atleast Atleast Atleast Collier Logan Every once a once a once a Year -Round County You actually need to fix the flow coming into Collier intersection down to logan. It's 12519122965 3/24/21 Yes intersection. day week week Every day month Yes INo Resident website dangerous and drivers act like it's freeway I like it. Currently the traffic backup at Livingston and Immokalee is becoming I can't see how to go SB on 175 if untenable. There are times when it takes you are traveling West on Atleast Atleast Collier 2-3 cycles of the light just to continue Immokalee... this style Every once a once a Every Year -Round County 12519071190 3/24/21 straight on Livingston. No intersection is confusing to me. day Every day week month day No No Resident website Atleast Every once a Every Year -Round 12519058699 3/24/21 Good suggestion Yes day Every day week Every day day Yes No Resident Social media Highly recommend! Used one in Georgia at the intersection of 185 Atleast and Pleasant Hill Road in Every once a Year -Round 12519040977 3/24/21 No suburban Atlanta. day Every day Every day week No Resident Social media Atleast Atleast Atleast Atleast Atleast I don't once a once a once a once a once a Year -Round 12519018912 3/24/21 know week week week week week No No Resident Social media I like it but I think our residents Atleast and seasonal residents may have Every once a Every Year -Round I think this study will prove the traffic on immokolee rd has become unreasonable 12519016056 3/24/21 Smart. Yes issues navigating it. I like it. day Every day Every day week day Yes Yes Resident Social media and will continue to be so unless something productive is done. Thanks! My suggestion is to put roundabouts along immokalee road.stop lights make it very hard for people to get out of their neighborhoods. I live in Heritage Greens and it's a nightmare to get out because traffic stops and blocks our gate. I've At least waited upwards of 12 minutes to exit my Every once a Year -Round Please do something to keep the flow of traffic moving. Stop lights only hurt the 12519010064 3/24/211 neighborhood before. IYes I lRounclabout1day lEveryday lEveryday lEveryday 1week IYes IYes lResident ISocial media 1people trying to get out onto immokalee road. Respondent Start Date Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question Question 5 Question Question Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 a. b. C. d. ID 4 6 7 1 would hope that a sound/visual barrier wall be constructed on top of the berm north of the canal between the canal and condos on Deerfield Way and Cedar Springs Drive in Carlton Lakes. A new auto dealership and residential development is going to be built on Immokalee Road (south side of road) between Livingston and Juliet Blvd. Immokalee Road noise is almost unbearable now. With the addition of the auto dealer, residential development, proposed additional turn lanes unto Livingston, widening of Strand Blvd with additional lanes and a bridge with additional turn lanes it will be near disastrous to our immediate community in Carlton Lakes. I spend 4-5 months annually on Deerfield road directly across from the expected Germain Lexus dealer. Seasonal Direct I anticipate home values in the area will Resident notification plummet. I would like to know when this (temporary from HOA, plan will actually become reality so At least At least At least residence at friend, residents can determine what they would once a once a once a least 1 month neighbor, 12517114256 3/24/21 like to do with their property. Yes week Every day week Iweek Yes INo per year) etc.... I assume Seasonal Residents opinions won't matter one bit to Collier County. Direct notification Less from HOA, than Less than Less than At least friend, I don't once a once a once a once a Year -Round neighbor, 12516941729 3/24/21 No I know I I Imonth I Every day Imonth Imonth 1week IYes INo I Resident etc.... Respondent Question Question 5 Question Question Start Date Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 a. b. C. d. ID 4 6 7 This is terribly confusing and my chief concern is how this will effect the Carlton Lakes northern entrance/exit. It is incredibly difficult to get out of that exit with the amount of vehicles that speed up and down Livingston Road. Now that they will be zooming right across an overpass at Immokalee Road it will be even more difficult and increasingly dangerous. This is true especially for vehicles exiting Carlton Lakes and trying to get across Livingston Road with traffic speeding north and south Seasonal on Livingston Road and dealing Resident with vehicles making turns into (temporary and out of Delasol. There have At least At least Less than At least residence at I don't already been fatalities at that site This is just once a once a once a once a least 1 month Email 12516154985 3/23/21 know land countless near misses. confusing. month Every day month imonth week Yes lNo per year) notification The traffic will be greatly changed and many more cars are expected on the At least roadway with all the approved building. Every once a Every Year -Round Too much building and adding to already congested roads. Will look like Miami very 12514992013 3/23/21 Stop the congestion! day Every day Every day month day Yes No Resident Social media soon. At least At least At least At least Collier once a once a once a once a Year -Round County 12514789577 3/23/21 This is needed week week week week No No Resident website At least At least At least once a once a once a Every Year -Round Email 12513551299 3/23/21 Sounds great! No Too confusing Ok week Every day week month day Yes No Resident notification Left hand turns need to be longer at Livingston and Immokalee. Direct notification from HOA, At least At least At least friend, How does it affect the business on the NE once a once a once a Every Year -Round neighbor, 12513535087 3/23/21 corner? Yes week Every day month imonth day Yes lYes Resident etc.... This might work if a traffic signal would be installed at the Delasol and Carlton Lakes intersection. The traffic from the At least At least At least overpass would overwhelm Livingston Every once a once a once a Year -Round Email 12513165259 3/23/21 without that traffic control. Yes Design works. No day Every day week week week Yes Yes Resident notification Respondent Question Question 5 Question Question Start Date Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 a. b. C. d. ID 4 6 7 1 live near the 1-75/Immokalee interchange, and would recommend not removing the traffic light for 1-75's South -then - West bound traffic ... it looks like I am a full-time resident of Carlton Lakes it has been omitted from this and approve this SPUI at drawing. Ditto the same Livingston/Immokalee. Please consider recommendation for 1-75's South - easy entrance/exit to/from Carlton Lakes then -East bound traffic lane At least At least At least on Carlton Lakes Blvd. for residents of this traffic light that appears to have once a once a once a Year -Round Email 12513039138 3/23/21 Community. Thank you. Yes been omitted. Every day week imonth month Yes IYes Resident notification I appreciate the County's continuous improvement to traffic patterns and timing. Direct notification from HOA, Less than friend, Every once a Every Year -Round neighbor, 1251302508613/23/21 day Every day Every day imonth day Yes INo Resident etc.... Seasonal Direct Resident notification Very good idea. Need to ensure there is (temporary from HOA, access to Carlton Lakes Blvd when At least At least At least residence at friend, travelling northbound and going over the Every once a once a once a least 1 month neighbor, 12512907105 3/23/21 overpass. No 11 have heard they work well. day Every day week imonth month Yes INo per year) etc.... Yes , it's badly needed especially with seed to table on the corner of Livingston That's s00000 confusing and our and Immokalee road. All the cars come population is too old and too Please do not do what that have in Sarasota @ 1-75 and the mall , we have too out and pour onto Livingston going north many visitors would never be At least many seniors and out of town people in naples compared to the much younger and flip around ! It's a dangerous able to comprehend it .lives Every once a Every Year -Round Email Lakewood ranch population up there . Older brains would not understand that 12512901060 3/23/21 situation! Yes could be lost ! day Every day Every day week day Yes Yes Resident notification configuration and people would be killed and accidents would always be happening! Seasonal Resident (temporary At least At least At least At least residence at will Carlton Lakes Blvd be north or south once a once a once a once a least 1 month Email 12512897681 3/23/21 of the entrance to this SPUI Overpass? week Every day week 1week week Yes IYes per year) notification I like the idea but question out the exit from carlton lakes will work. At least now, we merge with north bound, then line up to u turn to go south. Not ideal but allows us to do each one at a time. At least Less than Please take note of the volume of traffic I don't Whatever gets rid of a few lights Every once a once a Every Year -Round Email 12512891423 3/23/21 coming out of StoT. 1know I'm for! INo Jday I Every day 1week Imonth Jday IYes INo I Resident Inotification JYeah.. help!!! :) Respondent Start. Date Question 1 Question 2 Question 3 Question Question 5 Question Question Question 8 Question 9 Question 10 a. b. C. d. ID 4 6 7 1 would think you would want it the other way around. Have Immokalee go over Livingston. The goal here is to get Immokalee traffic to move/flow better. Either way, I am all in favor for ANY At least improvements to traffic flow on Every once a Every Year -Round Email 12512423939 3/22/21 Immokalee. Yes 11 like it. I like it day Everyday lEveryday month day Yes INo Resident notification At least Every once a Every Year -Round Email 12512159947 3/22/21 looks like a good idea No I have heard these work well day Every day Every day week day Yes Yes Resident notification Happy you are trying to figure this out! Appendix E.6 General Project Comments Immokalee Rd Corridor Congestion Study (from Livingston Rd to Logan Blvd) General Public Comments and Responses 1 Email 3/22/2021 3/23/2021 Lorraine Lantz Jeff Rodgers 260-341-5800 Email N Thank you for your comments. They will be added to the project record. jrodgers@dekalbplastics.com Stop building east of 1-751111 2 Email 3/23/2021 3/24/2021 Lorraine Lantz Dean Blaser d3blaserCa7email.com Email N I'm sure what you are proposing will help move the traffic along faster on Immokalee Rd but with increased traffic do to growth in eastern Collier county Thank you for your comments regarding the Immokalee Road Congestion Study, they will be added to the project report. you will face the same problem five years from now. Seems you need another access to 75 other than Immokalee. A outer belt looping into eastern collier In response to your questions, please note that the Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study was performed to analyze the existing and future traffic conditions along the cty, or extending Pine Ridge something to decrease the flow with only one access. Immokalee Road corridor between Livingston Road and Logan Boulevard. The study reviewed both the existing traffic volumes and the anticipated traffic growth by the year 2040. Based on the growth projections, feasible corridor improvements were evaluated which would efficiently and effectively accommodate the projected growth by reducing delay and congestion and improving overall corridor operations. Collier County is currently working to alleviate some of the congestion on both Immokalee Road and Pine Ridge Road by completing the Vanderbilt Beach Road Extension (VBR Ext.). The VBR Ext. construction project is to create a new east/west facility from the existing VBR approximately 7 miles east (Collier Blvd. to 16th St. NE.). This project is in the final stage of design and construction is scheduled to begin in fiscal year 2022. In addition, a new interchange on 1-75 at Everglades Blvd. was pursued by Collier County Transportation Planning approximately 10 years ago. The Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) did not support the new interchange request and recommended that Collier County conduct further evaluations of other roadway improvements and projects to reduce the travel times associated with accessing I-75. That project information and status can be found on the Transportation Planning's website under the dropdown'Past- I-75/Everglades Blvd Interchange Justification Report (2013)' under Past Planning Studies. https://www.colliercountyfl.gov/your-government/divisions-s-z/transportation-planning/planning-studies" Please let me know if you have any additional questions. 3 Email 3/23/2021 3/23/2021 Lorraine Lantz Cheryl Nunes secatropix@amail.com Email N I live in Carlton Lakes, off immokalee and Livingston.....pls consider an overpass like at Airport and Golden Gate Thank you for your comments. They will be added to the project record. The recommended improvement for the Immokalee/Livingston Intersection is a Grade Separated Intersection commonly referred to as an overpass. The proposed conceptual design is to have Livingston Road go over Immokalee Road. This is similarto how Golden Gate Parkway currently goes over Airport Rd. The Board of County Commissioners (BCC) must first approve the current Planning Study and recommendations. That is tentatively scheduled for May. Once the recommendations are approved, additional phases of the corridor improvements will begin to be programmed and added to the County's Work Program. The next phase will likely be the Design which will evaluate the technical and engineering issues at the intersection. 4 Email 3/22/2021 3/22/2021 Lorraine Lantz Martin Sullivan mrsullvlCalaol.com Email Y Comment 1: What is a "SPUI"? Response 1: A SPUI is the acronym for a Single Point Urban Interchange. It is commonly known as an overpass. Comment 2: Thank you very much. I never would have come up with that! Response 2: Glad to help. Feel free to contact me if you have any additional comments or questions. Please note that your comments will be added to the project record. 5 Email Email l: Email l: Lorraine Lantz Paul Shea sheaprl948Ca7¢mail.com Email Y Email l: We don't have a clue what all thejargon for improvements mean.Do you really expect us to to comment? Or am l missing some information? Email l: Thank you for your comments, we will add them to the project report. Were you able to watch the video presentation linked to the website? Link to video 3/24/2021 3/25/2021 Email 2: I was able to watch the video and it was very helpful. My original comment was related to the few paragraphs you sent out. The video is a must Immokalee Congestion Study Video Email 2: Email 2: see for residents. One suggestion would be to slow the speakerjust a little for us olderfolks to keep up. Overall it was well done. Thank you Our intent in producing the video was to inform the public of the recommended improvements along the corridor. We understand that some of the recommended 3/25/21 3/25/21 solutions are innovative. The video animations are intended to demonstrate how a vehicle moves through the more complicated intersections. As we revise and update the project information on the website, we will try to minimize the technical information. If there is anything about the study or the specific intersections you would like additional information on, please contact me and I would be more than happy to explain it. Thank you. Email 2: Thank you for the compliment on the video. Our team worked hard to put that together. We are also trying to update the website to clarify/explain the recommendations better. 6 Email Email 1: Email 1: Lorraine Lantz Marc Hoffman mahoff767(d)gmail.com Email Y Email 1: I read your summary of the Immokalee Road improvement study. You indicated there would be an opportunity for public comments. I would Email 1: Thank you for your comments, we will add them to the project report. Were you able to watch the video presentation linked to the website? Link to video 3/25/2021 3/25/2021 suggest you include definitions of what the proposed changes are, such as SPUI, DDI, and PLDT, so we know what you are talking about. Thank you Immokalee Congestion Study Video Email 2: Email 2: Old Cypress Community Our intent in producing the video was to inform the public of the recommended improvements along the corridor. We understand that some of the recommended 3/25/21 4/6/21 North Naples Email 2: Thank you very much, I did not see the link to the video presentation which is very helpful. My comments concern the assumptions used in solutions are innovative. The video animations are intended to demonstrate how a vehicle moves through the more complicated intersections. As we revise and update the Email 3: making the future volume projections. In addition to looking at rush hour traffic is it safe to assume you looked at peak season traffic? Also, the current project information on the website, we will try to minimize the technical information. The descriptions below are intended to help describe the innovative intersection 4/7/21 and near future growth in housing and commercial development further east on Immolalee Rd. and adjacent properties is dramatic and it would seem very design concepts. difficult to predict growth further out to 2040. How much growth did you predict and is it a best case, worst case or most likely scenario? Lastly, it seems -Intersection A- Livingston Rd. —Convert to a Single Point Urban Interchange (SPUI) commonly known as an Overpass. The recommendation is for Livingston Road to go that more needs to be done to take traffic off of Immokalee, are there any other plans to do this? I know there are plans to extend Vanderbilt Beach over (as a bridge) Immokalee Road (at -grade). This is similar to the Golden Gate Parkway /Airport Road Overpass. further east but I would forsee that traffic using Logan to Immokalee to gain access to 1-75. Is it possible to have an i-75 interchange at Vanderbilt? Also, is -Intersection C and D - I-75 On/Off Ramps —Convert to a Diverging Diamond Interchange (DDI). Note —for this recommendation there will be no change to the traffic there consideration to extending Collier Blvd. north to Bonita Beach Rd. Finally, given the limitations on how much you can do to improve Immokalee Rd., pattern on I-75. The changes are how traffic along Immokalee Road shifts (or diverges) to the opposite side of the road at a traffic signal as it pass under I-75. This it would seem only prudent to stricktly limit further development to the east that would use the lmmolalee Rd.corridor. Thank you for the opportunity to configuration is unusual in that it requires traffic, while under 1-75, to briefly drive on the opposite side of the road. Large overhead signs, barriers and/or pavement comment. markings will be used to direct traffic. These DDIs are innovative solutions to reduce delay and increase mobility and safety. There is a fully operational DDI at 1-75 and University Parkway in Sarasota. In addition, FOOT is constructing a DDI for the Colonial Blvd. interchange at 1-75 in Fort Myers, this location is also referred to as the Forum. Email 3: Ms. Lantz, -Intersection I - Logan Blvd.— Reconstruct the intersection to include a Partial Displaced Left Turn (PDLT) also known as a Continuous Flow Intersection (CFI) along Immokalee First I want to thank you for taking the time to write such a comprehensive answer to my questions, it is refreshing to find a public official so responsive Rd. The PDLT reconfigures the roadway by allowing vehicles to cross to the left side of the roadway before the intersection. This allows for additional concurrent traffic and transparent. I trust that the methodology used to project future growth and transportation needs is the best available. As in all projections, things movements not possible at a conventional signalized intersection. These additional concurrent movements increase signal efficiency and provide the opportunity for longer seldom go exactly according to plan, especially when you go out 25 years in the future in a community growing as fast as Collier County. My concern is green times for all movements. that the growth will exceed that projected in the LRTP and or the funding will fall short of the projections. That is why I would support a conservative If there is anything about the study or the specific intersections you would like additional information on, please contact me and I would be more than happy to try to growth strategy that would limit additional development along this corridor to match the projections in the plan. lust today there were newspaper legal explain them. notices of two more zoning change requests for commercial and residential projects on Immokalee Rd. east of 951. The development of the new "villages" As for public comment, there is a survey on our website as well as the video. https://www.colliercountyfl.gov/your-government/divisions-s-z/transportation- in the rural lands area is also concerning. Hardly a week goes by without a notice of a proposed zoning change east of 1-75. As you already indicated, there planning/planning-studies are limited options for increasing traffic flow so the obvious answer is to limit the increase in traffic flow to match capacity. The old saying of"You can't After the public comment period, we will make revisions to the study as appropriate and then the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) will be requested to approve the put 10 pounds in a 5 pound bag" comes to mind. Planning Study and recommendations. That is tentatively scheduled for May. When a final date is determined, it will be placed on the website. All BCC Meetings begin at In closing I want to thank you again for the opportunity to comment and again express appreciation for your thoughtful responses to my questions. 9:00 AM and are held in the BCC Chambers located on the 3rd Floor of the Collier County Government Center, 3299 Tamiami Trail East, Naples, FL 34112. Once the Marc Hoffman recommendations are approved, additional phases of the corridor improvements will begin to be programmed as funding becomes available and added to the County's Olde Cypress Community Work Program. North Naples Thank you. Email 2: Mr. Hoffman, 7 Email 3/27/2021 Email 1: Lorraine Lantz Dr Joseph Crivelli 239 5941148 Email N Rather than 4lanes exiting Strand Boulevard, there should be 5 lanes consisting of 2 dedicated right lanes, one center cross lane and 2 dedicated left lanes Email 1: Dr. Crivelli, 3/29/21 jandperivelli@gmail.com for optimum traffic movement. Thank you for your comments. We will add them to the project record. Email 2: Thank you for this opportunity to contribute my opinion. Email 2: Dr. Crivelli, 3/30/21 Dr. Joseph Crivelli Thank you for your comments. In response, we had our engineers review and analyze your suggestion. Their analysis concluded that the addition of a second southbound Resident of the Strand right turn only lane at Strand Blvd. would not significantly benefit the intersection traffic operation. I have included an enlarged snap shot of the proposed intersection. We 239 594 1148 are proposing one right turn only and a right or straight lane to accommodate the movements. [picture inserted of proposed conceptual] We thank you for your time and comments, as they will be added to the project report. 1of9 8/5/2021 mom MM.Requested, I 8 Email 3/31/2021 3/31/2021 Lorraine Lantz Lynne Gorski 317-698-0515 Email Y Our northern home is in Hamilton County, Indiana. We have the largest number of roundabouts in the country (I'm not kidding.) Thank you for the links. Yes, roundabouts can be an effective tool for traffic management. gorski.lynne@gmail.com https://www.visithamiltoncounty.com/plan/hamilton-county-maps/roundabouts/ The Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) is currently working to evaluate the future needs of the interstate. The portion of FDOT's project that relates to Lee and Many other communities from across the US have come to see the different varieties and methods for constructing roadways that include roundabouts, Collier Counties is called the Southwest Connect 1-75 South Corridor. The status and schedule of the FDOT study can be found at this link: and elevated decking over roundabout type sub -roads, to manage our dramatic increase in traffic. Hamilton County is regularly voted among the top 10 https://www.swflinterstates.com/i75-south-corridor/ FDOT's Planning and Feasibility study will evaluate strategies to improve both the mainline of 1-75 as well as the places to live/work/raise a family by Forbes and many other publications so we have seen a massive growth in population and traffic over the last decade. interchanges. I encourage you to participate in that study as well. It may be helpful for you guys to take a peek at the variety of solutions we have implemented in a situation similar to the Immokalee Road issue. It has In response to your question, according to the 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP), approved on 12/11/20, the extension of Collier Blvd. from where it currently been an enormous help. I for one, love roundabouts as they keep traffic moving and have greatly diminished congestion. terminates (north of Immokalee Rd.) to the Lee/Collier County Line as a new 2-lane facility is an unfunded need. That means that the project is recognized as a planning Our Naples home is in Esplanade, at Immokalee and Collier. The dramatic growth in development east of Collier boulevard, especially with that new multi- need, however there are no funds for construction between now and the horizon year of 2045. The LRTP is updated every 5 years and could be amended in the interim use complex on the SE corner of Immokalee and Collier, coupled with all of the new housing developments east of there, is only going to make this issue years, if funding becomes available. Please note that this project was also listed as an unfunded need in the 2040 LRTP. worse. Please let me know if you have any additional questions. Thank you for your comments, we will add them to the project record. I know the original plan to take Collier north toward Bonita Beach Road was planned for 2040, but with the dramatic increase in population, we will desperately need another north/south artery to relieve congestion between Collier and and Logan, and even to 175 long before 2040. Are there any discussions to bring that project forward? I would also recommend that it be 4 lanes, and not 2 as was done on the Logan extension north to Bonita Beach. That is already undersized, with many delays because of slow moving traffic along there, and only 1 lane in each direction. Thanks for hearing my comments. 9 Email 3/31/2021 Lorraine Lantz Cheryl Horbal AAA Blind Factory Y Lorraine, I was interested in taking the survey regarding the proposed work on Immokalee Road, we are residents of Longshore Lake. Can you forward me Information about the Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion study can be found on our website at the following link: https://www.colliercountyfl.gov/your- Window Fashion Center that link please? government/divisions-s-z/transportation-planning/planning-studies 3940 Radio Road, N101 Naples, FL 34104 There is information about the project as well as a video which explains the process and the recommendations along the corridor. We understand that some of the (239) 434-8188 recommended solutions are innovative. The video animations are intended to demonstrate how a vehicle moves through the more complicated intersections. Below the Fax (239) 434-8447 link to the video you will also find a link to the survey. I have also attached all links here for your convenience. dalesaaa@gmail.com Video Please click on the following link for a narrated presentation that further explains the recommended improvements at each intersection and other proposed improvements. Link to video Immokalee Congestion Study Video Survey Your feedback is important! Please click on the following link to complete a survey and provide comments on the recommended improvements. Link to survey Immokalee Congestion Study Survey Please let me know if I can help you with anything else. 10 Email 4/1/2021 4/1/2021 Lorraine Lantz Barbara Thiele barbthieleCdearthlink.net N I received info from my community regarding plans for the Immokalee Road corridor. PLEASE - let's put a STOP to all the building and development going Thank you for your comments. They will be added to the project record. on. It's out of control. That is why we have the traffic problem. Too much building. Naples is getting to be an over populated over grown city. No longer beautiful. Barbara Thiele of Longshore Lake 11 Email Emaill: Emaill: Lorraine Lantz Frank Nappo fnnaplesl@amail.com N Emaill: The situation we are experiencing is the same as the one corrected in the strand a few years ago. The cut through from executive drive capacity is Email 1: Mr. Nappo, Thank you for your comments regarding the Immokalee Rd. Corridor Congestion Study. I will forward them to the consultant for review and response, if 4/1/2021 4/1/21 239-250-8009 one car and can not handle any of the larger vehicles and trailers.Therefore when traffic backs up to immokalee road Valewood drive is blocked in both appropriate. Your comments will be incorporation in the study report documentation. Email 2: Email 2: directions.ie trailers blocking valewood going towards Palazzo. We are averaging an accident a week atthis intersection .Members of longshore lake have Emaill: I forwarded your comments to our Traffic Operations Department. If they have any additional information, they will reach out to you. 4/9/21 4/9/21 been involved. We have a petition approaching 200 signatures to address this dangerous situation. The valewood cut through is also used for "U" turns as Regarding the Immokalee Rd. Congestion Corridor Study recommendations at those intersections please see the graphic below. The recommendation is to restripe existing well. To complicate the situation traffic also crosses Valewood from the dead end utility drive location. At times you have cars crossing valewood drive lanes to add through/right turn lane and increase the turn lane lengths. from both directions. Lately the intersection of Valewood and Immokalee left lane is also being used as a "u"turn. A solution is to close the cut through as was done in the strand. Executive drive can be a right turn only. Executive drive has access to Immokalee at the mobile station. The cut through could be used as left hand turn to executive drive as well.We need help.Thank You Frank Nappo 239-250-8009 Email 2: These recommendation are inadequate. Basically the Executive drive cut through needs to be addressed. If not than we will have to wait as always for a terrible accident. Thank you for your follow up. Frank Nappo 239 250 8009 12 Email 4/7/2021 4/9/2021 Lorraine Lantz Cheryl E. White cheriewhitee@att.net I cannot express strongly enough my total disgust of this plan to build an overpass practically in my front yard. I agree that the traffic has become Thank you for your comments, we will add them to the project documentation and public record. Carlton Lakes rediculous and forthat I thank all of those planning board members who have said a mightyyes to any new building... be it commercial or residential The Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study was performed to analyze and consider alternatives (both conventional and innovative) for Immokalee Rd. Were you able further east on Immokalee Road. As long as it doesn't affect me go for it, seems to be their thinking. to watch the video presentation linked to the website? Link to video: https://collier.granicus.com/player/clip/3004?view_id=4&redirect=true As it is, all this construction has had a huge impact, not only on Immokalee and Livingston Roads but also the beaches. The beach was your bread and Collier County is currently working to alleviate some of the congestion on Immokalee Road by completing the following projects: butter, now it's shoulder to shoulder people. Vanderbilt Beach Road Extension (VBR Ext.). The VBR Ext. construction project is to create a new east/west facility from the existing VBR approximately 7 Aren't there alternatives? What about building a road south around Golf Club of the Everglades and take some of this burden off of Immokalee Road and miles east (Collier Blvd. to 16th St. NE.). This project is in the final stage of design and construction is scheduled to begin in fiscal year 2022. share it with Vanderbilt Beach Road? VBR Ext. from 16th St. NE to Everglades Blvd. The continuation of the project listed above, will be moving into the design phase in fiscal year 2022. Then STOP the building everywhere! We have been here 30 years and know what has been lost. Naples is no longer that quaint, beautiful town except for VBR from East of U541 to East of Goodlette-Frank Road. This road widening project will expand VBR from four to six lanes and extend approximately 1.8 the small downtown area and its surroundings. miles from just east of US 41 to approximately the intersection of Vanderbilt Beach Road and Fontana Del Sol Way. The final design plans are expected to be completed late Please listen to the people who live in this area. There has to be another solution. in 2021 and construction is slated to begin in 2022. Please let me know if you have any additional comments or questions. 2of9 8/5/2021 13 Email 14 Email 4/11/2021 4/12/2021 Lorraine Lantz Email 1: 4/13/2021 Lorraine Lantz 4/13/2021 Email 2: 4/13/21 Kathleen Butera kath lee n b utera @va hoo.com> N I have reviewed the proposed changes to improve Immokolee Road traffic congestion. It is clear a lot of thought and time has gone into the project. I do not believe the overpass at Livingston is going to solve the problem. This morning I was running early and already there was a considerable amount of traffic on Immokolee; there was very little traffic on Livingston. Livingston has become an alternative to 175 for the following reasons: -Excessive rush hour traffic on 175 resulting in congestion -No exit route from Bonita Beach Road until Corkscrew and area that consistently has traffic accidents Possible solutions I see are: -Free on/off ramps at Vanderbilt and the new Veteran's Parkway -Widening of i75. Sharen Lamb 4415 Bittern Ct Y Email 1: Lorraine —I live in the Longshore Lake community which is right off of Immokalee Rd so all of this discussion interests me very much. I have some 860-558-7970 thoughts and question. 1) The extension of Logan as just a two lane road was a waste of time. It should have been 2 lanes both ways from the get go. Are klambs@comcast.net there any plans to do that. 2) are there any plans to extend Collier Blvd to connect somehow to 175? Doing that, especially with all the developments going in east of Collier would alleviate much of the traffic on Immokalee. 3) It seems that the time has perhaps come to add entrances and exits to 175 from Vanderbilt Beach Rd. Drivers traveling north on Airport -Pulling, Livingston and Oakes eventually end up on Immokalee adding to the congestion. The solutions to the Immokalee issue are not going to be easy ones but it seems imperative that the solutions be real, long term solutions and not just money wasting bandaids. Thank you for your time. Sharen Lamb 4415 Bittern Ct 860-558-7970 Email 2: Thank you for your very thorough response. 15 Email 4/3/2021 Email 1: Michelle Scavone N/A N/A mooretuninthesun@gmail.co Y You have received this feedback from Marsha L Moore< mooretuninthesun@gmail.com> for the tollowing page: 4/13/21 m https://www.colliercount,/fl.gov/your-government/divisions-s-z/transportation-planning/planning-studies Email 2: 4/14/21 Why can't you add 2 Overpasses like you have at Golden Gate and Airport Pulling, by 1-75? Thank you for your careful review of our project and for the comments and questions. While the Immokalee Congestion Study is intended to propose recommendations for the Immokalee Corridor, Collier County and our regional partners Lee County and the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) are also working on recommendations and traffic solutions. Collier County is currently working to alleviate some of the congestion on Immokalee Road by completing the following projects: -Vanderbilt Beach Road Extension (VBR Ext.). The VBR Ext. construction project is to create a new east/west facility from the existing VBR approximately 7 miles east (Collier Blvd. to 16th St. NE.). This project is in the final stage of design and construction is scheduled to begin in fiscal year 2022. -VBR Ext. from 16th St. NE to Everglades Blvd. The continuation of the project listed above, will be moving into the design phase in fiscal year 2022. -VBR from East of US 41 to East of Goodlette-Frank Road. This road widening project will expand VBR from four to six lanes and extend approximately 1.8 miles from just east of US 41 to approximately the intersection of Vanderbilt Beach Road and Fontana Del Sol Way. The final design plans are expected to be completed late in 2021 and construction is slated to begin in 2022. •A study of the congestion on Pine Ridge Road from Livingston Rd. to Napa Blvd. was completed and approved in 2018. The recommended project at the intersection of Pine Ridge Rd. and Livingston Rd. was a Continuous Flow Intersection (CFI) which is scheduled for design in this fiscal year and construction beginning in fiscal year 2023. -The Veterans Memorial Blvd. projects are broken up into phases. Phase I is to extend Veterans to the new high school, west of the existing elementary school. This 2-lane facility is expected to be complete in summer 2023. Phase 11 will extend the roadway to Old 41 Road. Design of that phase is expected to begin in late 2021 and construction may start in spring of 2023. Once Phase 11 is constructed it will be a parallel segment to Immokalee Road which will assist travelers with an alternate route. In addition, FOOT is currently working to evaluate the future needs of the interstate (1-75). The portion of the project that relates to Lee and Collier Counties is called the Southwest Connect 1-75 South Corridor. The status and schedule of the FDOT study can be found at this link: httPs:Hu rid efense.co m/v3/_https://www.swfl i nterstates. co m/i 75-south- corridor/_;!!B5cixuoO7ltTeg!Rz6ltJwLwAWmZPIVCGejv_volg4Na8pYIJV87lyA6gXf36vAogrer8AdVvj Kg7wTMH211Q$ FDOT's Planning and Feasibility study will evaluate strategies to improve both the mainline of 1-75 (by adding lanes) as well as the interchanges and is intended to identify and include potential modifications and requests for new interchanges. I encourage you to participate in that study as well. I hope that this email provides you with the requested information. We will take your comments into consideration and will incorporate them into the final planning study documentation and the project record. Ms. Lamb, Thank you for your comments. If you have not done so already, please review our Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study- Immokalee Road from Livingston Road to Logan Boulevard. The study includes evaluating intersection concepts along the corridor to enhance traffic operations and safety concerns based on current and future travel demands. The following link is to a video presentation explaining the recommendations: https:Huridefense.com/v3/_https://collier.granicus.com/player/clip/3004?view_id=4&redirect=true!! B5cixuoO7ltTeg!XcZ6_9uS2HrH H3zg2x106LTrhNY7- Ifnz ESM4Sd U DY08-Key63XRV H e3vj EXnvDoBr-TmA$ In regards to your questions: 1. There are no current plans to widen Logan Blvd. from a 2 lane facility to a 4 lane facility north of Immokalee Rd. to the Lee/Collier County line. 2. The Long Range Transportation Plan is to extend Collier Blvd. as a new 2-lane facility north and then west to connect to Logan Blvd. and then continue north (as the existing Logan Blvd.) to Bonita Beach Road. This is recognized as a need in both the Collier and Lee County MPO Plans, but is not funded. 3. Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) maintains the interstate. FOOT is currently working on a study of the future needs of 1-75 called the Southwest Connect 1-75 South Corridor. The status and schedule of the FOOT study can be found at this link: https:Hurldefense.com/v3/_https://www.swflinterstates.com/i75-south- corridor/_;!!B5cixuoO7ltTeg!XcZ6_9uS2HrHH3zg2x106LTrh NY7-IfnzESM4Sd UDY08-Key63XRVHe3vjEXnvBWWX146A$ FDOT's Planningand Feasibility study will evaluate strategies to improve both the mainline of 1-75 as well as the interchanges and is intended to identify and include potential modifications and requests for new interchanges. I encourage you to participate in that study. We will add your comments to the Immokalee Road Congestion Study documentation and project record. Email 1: We are in receipt of your inquiry. It has been forwarded to the appropriate staff for a response by close of business day on 4/20/2021 or sooner if possible. Email 2: Ms. Moore, Thank you, for your comments. Although you did not specify which 2 intersections you are suggesting, Principal Planner Lorraine Lantz has provided the following information: Transportation Planning is currently conducting the Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study - Immokalee Road from Livingston Road to Logan Boulevard. The study includes evaluating intersection concepts along the corridor to enhance traffic operations and safety concerns based on current and future travel demands. The following link is to a video presentation explaining the recommendations: https://collier.granicus.com/player/clip/3004?view_id=4&redirect=true The recommendations for that study includes converting the intersection of Immokalee Road and Livingston Road to a Single Point Urban Interchange (SPUI) — this is commonly known as an Overpass. The recommendation is that Immokalee Road remain at grade and bridge Livingston Road over Immokalee Road. This is similar to the intersection of Golden Gate Parkway and Airport Road, where Golden Gate Parkway goes over Airport Road. The study also recommends converting the intersection of Immokalee Road and Logan Boulevard to a Partial Displaced Left Turn (PDLT) also known as a Continuous Flow Intersection (CFI) along Immokalee Road. This improvement will increase signal efficiency by allowing for longer green times at each leg of the intersection. The Board of County Commissioners is expected to review and approve the study and these recommendations in the late spring. If these recommendations move forward, the County will work towards funding them in their capital improvement budget. For the two major intersection improvements mentioned above, based on the transportation needs and anticipated funds - the long range plan is as follows: -Immokalee Road at Livingston Road- The construction is planned between the years 2026-2030 -Immokalee Road and Logan Boulevard - The preliminary engineering is planned between the years 2031-2035 and the construction phase is planned between the years 2036-2045 Please let Mrs. Lantz know if you have any additional questions (I have copied her on this email). On behalf of Lorraine Lantz, Principal Planner Michelle Scavone, Operations Coordinator 16 Email 4/14/2021 4/14/2021 Lorraine Lantz Dennis Lively dennis@abilitvteam.com N Thank you Lorraine! Very intormative and easy to understand. Great job! Thank you for your comments. They will be added to the public record and the project documentation. I've traversed the DDI at Sarasota. Different! Sarasota is also installing traffic circles at some of their busiest intersections, such as Fru!tville Rd and US 41. BE SAFE! 17 Email 4/15/2021 4/15/2021 Lorraine Lantz Robert Parker (239)248-9450 N I live in Longshore Lake and drive Valewood every day. There are two critical issues the county plan fails to address. Thank you for your careful review of our project. We will take your comments into consideration and will incorporate them into the final planning study documentation. I Itcflret@aol.com 1. Valewood needs a left turn arrow to proceed east on Immokalee. I have seen many near misses when people fail to yield to straight across traffic. The have also forwarded your comments to our Traffic Operations Department. If they have any additional information, they will reach out to you. small sign which says left turn must yield is inadequate. Many times 6-8 cars are waiting on 1 car to turn left. 2. The westbound traffic on Immokalee constantly blocks the intersection and traffic leaving Valewood has no place to go. We need permanent blinking vellow lights and siens similar to the one on eastbound Immokalee. 3of9 8/5/2021 ENN.-MMUMM 18 Email 4/15/2021 4/15/2021 Lorraine Lantz Cherie White cheriewhitee@att.net N I had written to you before this to state my objections to this newest affront to the people who live around that Immokalee and Livingston intersection. My As you are indicating,yes- sometimes improvements are not on the specific roadway that is experiencing the delays but as is the case with Vanderbilt Beach Road Ext. (refer to husband and I have come up with a couple more ideas. discussed previously, it will relieve multiple parallel east/west corridors. Comment 12 The problems really are at a peak from approximately 7 to 9 in the am and 3:30 to 6 in the pm. Even with the overpass you still have the mess around 75. Regarding your suggestion for multiple new interchanges, that effort is being conducted by the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) as they maintain the interstate. for previous There are 2 areas where a road could be cut through from 75 to Livingston. One abuts the southern side of the North Regional Park and the other is a road FDOT is currently working on a study of the future needs of 1-75 called the Southwest Connect 1-75 South Corridor. The status and schedule of the FDOT study can be found corresponden already in place the back entrance to the Strand. Both of these would take the pressure off the Immokalee interchange and save millions of dollars. at this link: https:Hurldefense.com/v3/_https://www.swflinterstates.com/i75-south-corridor/ !!B5cixuoO7ltTeg!TTeS1FOdxKSilxjWleZ6wso4R- ee) The big issue is all this crazy building out on Immokalee Road. Beautiful Naples is becoming smaller Miami! IM3nccAo2_1LMWJQw8v2GLe7djgYq_NEXW7xuwPgdFw$ FDOT's Planning and Feasibility study will evaluate strategies to improve both the mainline of 1-75 as well as Cherie White the interchanges and is intended to identify and include potential modifications and requests for new interchanges. I encourage you to participate in that study. Carlton Lakes I hope that this email provides you with the requested information. Thank you for your careful review of our project. We will take your comments into consideration and will incorporate them into the final planning study documentation. Please let me know if you have any additional comments or questions. 19 Email 4/15/2021 4/15/2021 Lorraine Lantz Michael Dunn mdunn85@hotmail.com Y Please take the attached letter into consideration before deciding to destroy our peaceful and lovely neighborhood. As one of the closest units to Mr. Dunn, CC:maureendunn5@gmail.co Livingston Rd, the noise, additional traffic and severe loss of value to our community should betaken into account before installing an overpass practically We are currently working on scheduling a meeting with Carlton Lakes to discuss the options in the area. Please note that this is the public involvement phase of the corridor m, over our heads! Please, please, please come up with a new solution. study. No final decision has been made. We appreciate your input and will add them to the project documentation and public record. colleenpatrickl7@gmail.com Sincerely, As a reminder, we have placed a narrated video presentation on our project website to assist with understanding the Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study. Link to , supkdunn@gmail.com, Michael Dunn video: https://collier.granicus.com/player/clip/3004?view_id=4&redirect=true danieldunn@me.com> 5115 Cobble Creek Court Edgewater at Carlton Lakes «ATTACHMENT» 5115 Cobble Creek Court Edgewater at Carlton Lakes 20 Email 4/15/2021 4/15/2021 Lorraine Lantz Andrea Backes Y Subject: Petition for Carlton Lakes Ms. Backes, <<ATTACMENT (same attachment as Michael Dunn listed above)>> We are currently working on scheduling a meeting with Carlton Lakes to discuss the options in the area. Please note that this is the public involvement phase of the corridor study. No final decision has been made. We appreciate your input and will add it to the project documentation and public record. As a reminder, we have placed a narrated video presentation on our project website to assist with understanding the Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study. Link to video: httPs:Hurldefense.com/v3/_https://collier.granicus.com/player/clip/3004?view_id=4&redirect=true 1lBScixuo07ltTeg!5L4xgGQpupmTdy- w1MFMVvT06fXpRNx1F6d Hv7zBbcgcMXQUglZL-48H91ps5VXcwzj-3A$ aib2874@email.com Thank you. 21 Email 4/15/2021 4/15/2021 Lorraine Lantz Augustine Perillo aueielizo@zmail.com Y Subject: Edgewater at Carlton Lakes Petition Regarding Overpass at Livingston Road and Immokalee Road Mr. Perillo, <<ATTACMENT (same attachment as Michael Dunn listed above)>> We are currently working on scheduling a meeting with Carlton Lakes to discuss the options in the area. Please note that this is the public involvement phase of the corridor study. No final decision has been made. We appreciate your input and will add it to the project documentation and public record. As a reminder, we have placed a narrated video presentation on our project website to assist with understanding the Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study. Link to video: https:Huridefense.com/v3/_https://collier.granicus.com/player/clip/3004?view_id=4&redirect=true!! BScixuoO7ltTeg! Q4GrcBHly_FTejtjkfzSaZWSfNcIFF1N nHSYbSrdtBr 7jlhN9TpnUtiHMfyW DLGuDr_ZA$ Thank you. 22 Email 4/15/2020 4/15/2020 Lorraine Lantz Paula Pawlowski Paula and Bob Pawlowski N To the Collier County Planning Committee, Mrs. Pawlowski, 5360 #202 Andover Drive My husband and I live in the Carlton Lakes Community along Livingston Road. We are definitely opposed to the construction of an Overpass on Livingston We are currently working on scheduling a meeting with Carlton Lakes representatives to discuss the options in the area. We appreciate your comments and will add it to the paulapaw@me.com Road. Livingston is not the problem, Immokolee Road is the problem! project documentation and public record. We feel this overpass will create more of a traffic problem than it will help. We see it as a big waste of tax dollars on a bad solution to the Immokolee Road As a reminder, we have placed a narrated video presentation on our project website to assist with understanding the Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study. Link to congestion! video: https:Hcollier.granicus.com/player/clip/3004?view_id=4&redirect=true This will be a big detriment to our Community. We are already dealing with the traffic mess from Seed to Table! We urge you to reconsider this plan and come up with a better solution. 23 Email 4/15/2021 4/16/2021 Lorraine Lantz Greg Geddis Rre¢zeddis2CWemail.com Please open atttached Mr. Geddis, <<ATTACMENT (same attachment as Michael Dunn listed above, includes signature)>> We are currently working on scheduling a meeting with Carlton Lakes to discuss the options in the area. Please note that this is the public involvement phase of the corridor study. No final decision has been made. We appreciate your input and will add it to the project documentation and public record. As a reminder, we have placed a narrated video presentation on our project website to assist with understanding the Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study. Link to video: https:Hcollier.granicus.com/player/clip/3004?view_id=4&redirect=true Thank you. 24 Email 4/17/2021 4/18/2021 Lorraine Lantz Dick Jacobs Dick Jacobs N Just watched the study and found the improvements to be very good. I may not be alive to see the improvements,but my children and grandchildren may. Mr. Jacobs, 1996 Crestview Way I live just North of Logan in Heritage Greens and if you don't think that it is a mess getting out of this community and at times Saturnia Lakes do to the 2 Thank you for your comments regarding the Immokalee Road Congestion Study. We will add them to the project documentation and public record. Naples FL 34119 schools come down this way at 1:30 to 6:00 some day. I cannot get out of my community at times. This backup will eventually back up to Logan and mess 239-398-0416 with the flow going East. This area is only going to get worse as time goes on. Someday do a study on how to fix this driving nightmare. dickjacobs44@gmail.com 25 Email 4/21/2021 4/21/2021 Lorraine Lantz Douglas Wilson Douglas L. Wilson Y Ms. Lantz, Mr. Wilson, 616 Sanctuary Road I watched the video on the above study, which was very well done. I have a question. Thank you for your comments, they will become part of the project documentation and public record. Naples, FL 34120 At Livingston, they want to build an overpass North -South over Immokalee, instead of East-West over Livingston. I thought an E-W overpass would seem In regards to your question, the overpass at the Immokalee/Livingston intersection was evaluated both to run East-West over Livingston Road and North -South over doug34120@gmail.com the logical way to do it because traffic is greater along Immokalee Rd. (isn't it?). Is there a traffic forecast which justifies placing the overpass N-S? Immokalee Road. The recommended improvement, the overpass running North -South over Immokalee Road, handled the volume of traffic better and provided (239) 348-9191 significantly less intersection delay. Please let me know if you have any additional comments or questions. 4of9 8/5/2021 26 Email 27 Email 4/21/2021 Lorraine Lantz 4/15/2021 5/3/2021 Lorraine Lantz Steve Bagniuk Steve Bagniuk Ms. Lantz Mr. Bagniuk Sbagz@aol.com I am a resident of Longshore Lake which has been negatively affected by the increased traffic volume on Immokalee Road. Our association has shared the In response to your questions, Collier County is currently working to alleviate some of the congestion on both Immokalee Road and Pine Ridge Road by completing the proposed improvements along the corridor. following parallel reliever projects: All wonderful ideas which we will have to suffer through while the improvements are made. Meanwhile as more development continues to our east, the -Vanderbilt Beach Road Extension (VBR Ext.). The VBR Ext. construction project is to create a new east/west facility from the existing VBR approximately 7 miles east (Collier county needs to extend 951 northward to accomodate that growth. I understand that there are environmental concerns but if they can unite the florida Blvd. to 16th St. NE.). This project is in the final stage of design and construction is scheduled to begin in fiscal year 2022. keys with elevated bridges and roadways, they can do it with 951. I am frustrated that the county continues to allow huge developments east of 951 and -VBR Ext. from 16th St. NE to Everglades Blvd. The continuation of the project listed above, will be moving into the design phase in fiscal year 2022. yet has not planned to accomodate the added traffic. I believe in addition to the proposed improvements, efforts to reduce the traffic on Immokalee road -VBR from East of US 41 to East of Goodlette-Frank Road. This road widening project will expand VBR from four to six lanes and extend approximately 1.8 miles from just need to be investigated. Building northbound 951 as there are no northbound routes other than Logan and 175 is something that needs to be seriously east of US 41 to approximately the intersection of Vanderbilt Beach Road and Fontana Del Sol Way. The final design plans are expected to be completed late in 2021 and considered. Adding ramps at Vanderbuilt beach road might also help as there is no interstate access between Immokalee and Pine Ridge roads. The need construction is slated to begin in 2022. is there and the county needs to respond to this issue. I would appreciate a response to this email. Thankyou Marius & askmarius@email.com y Our community is in total disbelief that a project of such magnitude hasn't been openly discussed and/or presented to the public and to all parties that Alina could be impacted by it. Stoia Its just incomprehensible how a project with so many ramifications for our county and its residents has been kept under the wraps until the last minute; providing just minimum information and the single option to submit all our comments to the County Transportation Planning Department until April 16th, 5140 2021, without any further indication of a possible dialogue or feedback. This left us with almost no time to inform our communities and their owners, and Cobble very little time to prepare a proper response to this proposal. Creek Ct, As this study title indicates, this is a proposal designed to address the traffic congestion along the Immokalee Rd. corridor,between Livingston Rd. and Unit 203 Collier Blvd. Unfortunately theproposed overpass on Livingston Rd. at Immokalee Rd., cannot and would not diminish any of the incoming traffic going on Naples, Immokalee Rd. coming from Livingston Rd., that number will just get bigger and bigger. On the contrary, by eliminating a critical lane on each side of the FL 34110 bridge and shrinking its width from six to four lanes, it'll actually reduce its maximum capacityby 30%, creating not just a backup at peak hours, but also askmarius posinga traffic hazard for those trying to exit Livingston, but could not find a proper gap to change lanes in a timely manner, and to those who couldn't @gmail.c switch to the middle lane soon enough before the outside lane ends. At the same time all traffic coming off Livingston Rd. would have to be redirected om around the bridge and further on under the bridge and/or to the right or making a U-turn, creating even more obstacles and backups. The sameapplies for 646-808- the traffic coming off Immokalee Rd. into LivingstonRd., including a substantial and disruptive traffic going in and out from Seed to Table plaza and Carlton 5702 Lakes Blvd. In addition to that, our community will face increased levels ofnoise and pollution, and the incurable external obsolescence of staring at a bridge, instead of watching a sunset. As previously admitted by your planners, the real solution in this case would have been an overpass on Immokalee Rd., not on Livingston Rd. Because of the proximity of Immokalee Rd. to the canal and the prohibitive cost of such challenging execution, your planners were constrained to abandon this approach. Despite all the facts and evidence pleading against the rationale of this proposed overpass and against any common sense, this proposal is taking on a life of its own; which raises the question, who is actually the beneficiary of this multimillion dollar project? By all means ifs not us, neither the neighboringcommunities or businesses, nor our daily commuters or our county. Compared with the 38 million dollars Golden Gate Overpass in 2007, this new overpass with a projected budget of 30 to 35 million dollars, which might easily exceed 40 million by 2030, it would become just a money pit. On the other hand, it will take at least 4 years to complete and we can only imagine the havoc it'll create, in a place where traffic has already become a nightmare, and that before any construction even got started. And I didn't include the pollution, the noise, the dust and dirt,and all the suffering our city, our community and our street will have to endure, and last but not least, the plummeting values of our properties. Spending this kind of money on such a controversial project, with so limited benefit, isn't just a wasteful spending, but also represents a major stress on •A study of the congestion on Pine Ridge Road from Livingston Rd. to Napa Blvd. was completed and approved in 2018. The recommended project at the intersection of Pine Ridge Rd. and Livingston Rd. was a Continuous Flow Intersection (CFI) which is scheduled for design in this fiscal year and construction beginning in fiscal year 2023. In addition, FDOT is currently working to evaluate the future needs of the interstate. The portion of the project that relates to Lee and Collier Counties is called the Southwest Connect 1-75 South Corridor. The status and schedule of the FDOT study can be found at this link: https://www.swflinterstates.com/i75-south-corridor/ FDOT's Planning and Feasibility study will evaluate strategies to improve both the mainline of 1-75 as well as the interchanges and is intended to identify and include potential modifications and requests for new interchanges. I encourage you to participate in that study as well. For long range planning the County looks to the Collier MPO. The current Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) was adopted in December 2020 and plans for projects through the year 2045. Some roads are identified in the LRTP needs plan, indicating that if funding were not an obstacle, those roads would be constructed or improved for the entire road network and infrastructure to be optimized; however, funding is always a consideration. The 2045 LRTP prioritizes the transportation needs of the county and allocates anticipated funds to projects. The projects that are determined to be cost feasible are then the projects that the agencies (jurisdictions/municipalities) work towards funding in their capital improvement budgets Only those projects that have anticipated funding through 2045 are included in the 2045 LRTP Cost Feasible Plan, therefore if a certain road project is not on the plan— it is not funded in the County's budget and is not listed in the County's work program. Collier Blvd. extension to the Lee County Line is one of those projects, listed on the LRTP Needs plan but not in the Cost Feasible Plan. The plan for Collier Blvd. Ext. is to build a new 2-lane facility which carries vehicles north and then west to connect to Logan Blvd. and then continue north (as the existing Logan Blvd.) to Bonita Beach Road. The Lee County MPO has listed this project (from the county line north to Corkscrew Road) on their needs plan, not cost feasible plan. This project has been discussed and included as a need in both MPO's respective LRTP's for many years, but as you mentioned it has environmental concerns that will likely create lengthy and costly challenges, if this project moves forward. I hope that this email provides you with the requested information. Thank you for your careful review of our project and for the comments and questions. We will take your comments into consideration and will incorporate them into the final planning study documentation. Mr. Stoia, I apologize for not replying to your message sooner. It was removed from my in -bin by our IT department for security reasons and then forwarded to my Junk Mail. After speaking with you this morning, I checked my Junk Mail and contacted IT Security to release the email. As previously discussed, we met on Friday with representatives from Carlton Lakes to discuss the options in the area. We are also planning to host a virtual type meeting for this corridor study in the future. Please note that this is the public involvement phase of the corridor study. No final decision has been made. We appreciate your input and will add them to the project documentation and public record. Thank you. Respectfully, Lorraine [screenshot of email in junk folder] 5of9 8/5/2021 28 Email 29 email 4/15/2021 5/3/2021 Lorraine Lantz 4/14/2021 5/3/2021 Lorraine Lantz 30 Email 4/14/2021 5/11/2021 Lorraine Lantz Debra sheba2329@amail.com Y Our community is in total disbelief that a project of such magnitude hasn't been openly discussed and/or presented to the public and to all parties that Adamski could be impacted by it. It's just incomprehensible how a project with so many ramifications for our county and its residents has been kept under the & wraps until the last minute; providing just minimum information and the single option to submit all our comments to the County Transportation Planning Joseph Department until April 16th, 2021, without any further indication of a possible dialogue or feedback. This left us with almost no time to inform our Adamski communities and their owners, and very little time to prepare a proper response to this proposal. 5120 As this study title indicates, this is a proposal designed to address the traffic congestion along the Immokalee Rd. corridor, between Livingston Rd. and Cobble Collier Blvd. Unfortunately the proposed overpass on Livingston Rd. at Immokalee Rd., cannot and would not diminish any of the incoming traffic going on Creek Immokalee Rd. coming from Livingston Rd., that number will just get bigger and bigger. On the contrary, by eliminating a critical lane on each side of the Court, bridge and shrinking its width from six to four lanes, it'll actually reduce its maximum capacity by 30%, creating not just a backup at peak hours, but also Unit 103 posing a traffic hazard for those trying to exit Livingston, but could not find a proper gap to change lanes in a timely manner, and to those who couldn't Naples, FL switch to the middle lane soon enough before the outside lane ends. At the same time all traffic coming off Livingston Rd. would have to be redirected around the bridge and further on under the bridge and/or to the right or making a U-turn, creating even more obstacles and backups. The same applies for the traffic coming off Immokalee Rd. into Livingston Rd., including a substantial and disruptive traffic going in and out from Seed to Table plaza and Carlton Lakes Blvd. In addition to that, our community will face increased levels of noise and pollution, and the incurable external obsolescence of staring at a bridge, instead of watching a sunset. As previously admitted by your planners, the real solution in this case would have been an overpass on Immokalee Rd., not on Livingston Rd. Because of the proximity of Immokalee Rd. to the canal and the prohibitive cost of such challenging execution, your planners were constrained to abandon this approach. Despite all the facts and evidence pleading against the rationale of this proposed overpass and against any common sense, this proposal is taking on a life of its own; which raises the question, who is actually the beneficiary of this multimillion dollar project? By all means it's not us, neither the neighboring communities or businesses, nor our daily commuters or our county. Compared with the 38 million dollars Golden Gate Overpass in 2007, this new overpass with a projected budget of 30 to 35 million dollars, which might easily exceed 40 million by 2030, it would become just a money pit. On the other hand, it will take at least 4 years to complete and we can only imagine the havoc it'll create, in a place where traffic has already become a nightmare, and that before any construction even got started. And I didn't include the pollution, the noise, the dust and dirt, and all the suffering our city, our community and our street will have to endure, and last but not least, the plummeting values of our properties. Spending this kind of money on such a controversial project, with so limited benefit, isn't just a wasteful spending, but also represents a major stress on the our county's finite reserves, that would divert critical financial and human resources from more important and stringent projects, with immediate and substantial benefits for our county and its residents. Stephen SIGordo@msn.com y Our community is in total disbelief that a project of such magnitude hasn't been openly discussed and/or presented to the public and to all parties that Gordon askmarius@gmail.com could be impacted by it. 5115 suegart04@mac.com Its just incomprehensible how a project with so many ramifications for our county and its residents has been kept under the wraps until the last minute; Cobble mealey.nicholas@gmail.com providing just minimum information and the single option to submit all our comments to the County Transportation Planning Department until April 16th, Creek Ct. 2021, without any further indication of a possible dialogue or feedback. This left us with almost no time to inform our communities and their owners, and Unit 203 very little time to prepare a proper response to this proposal. Naples Fl. As this study title indicates, this is a proposal designed to address the traffic congestion along the Immokalee Rd. corridor, between Livingston Rd. and 805-390- Collier Blvd. Unfortunately the proposed overpass on Livingston Rd. at Immokalee Rd., cannot and would not diminish any of the incoming traffic going on 6366 Immokalee Rd. coming from Livingston Rd., that numberwill just get bigger and bigger. On the contrary, by eliminating a critical lane on each side of the bridge and shrinking its width from sixto four lanes, it'll actually reduce its maximum capacity by 30%, creating notjust a backup at peak hours, but also posing a traffic hazard for those trying to exit Livingston, but could not find a proper gap to change lanes in a timely manner, and to those who couldn't switch to the middle lane soon enough before the outside lane ends. At the same time all traffic coming off Livingston Rd. would have to be redirected around the bridge and further on under the bridge and/or to the right or making a U-turn, creating even more obstacles and backups. The same applies for the traffic coming off Immokalee Rd. into Livingston Rd., including a substantial and disruptive traffic going in and out from Seed to Table plaza and Carlton Lakes Blvd. In addition to that, our community will face increased levels of noise and pollution, and the incurable external obsolescence of staring at a bridge, instead of watching a sunset. As previously admitted by your planners, the real solution in this case would have been an overpass on Immokalee Rd., not on Livingston Rd. Because of the proximity of Immokalee Rd. to the canal and the prohibitive cost of such challenging execution, your planners were constrained to abandon this approach. Despite all the facts and evidence pleading against the rationale of this proposed overpass and against any common sense, this proposal is taking on a life of its own; which raises the question, who is actually the beneficiary of this multimillion dollar project? By all means its not us, neither the neighboring communities or businesses, nor our daily commuters or our county. Compared with the 38 million dollars Golden Gate Overpass in 2007, this new overpass with a projected budget of 30 to 35 million dollars, which might easily exceed 40 million by 2030, it would become just a money pit. On the other hand, it will take at least 4 years to complete and we can only imagine the havoc it'll create, in a place where traffic has already become a nightmare, and that before any construction even got started. And I didn't include the pollution, the noise, the dust and dirt, and all the suffering our city, our community and our street will have to endure, and last but not least, the plummeting values of our properties. Spending this kind of money on such a controversial project, with so limited benefit, isn't just a wasteful spending, but also represents a major stress on Lisa O'Toole lisaotoolefl@amail.com Y Asa homeowner in Carlton Lakes, I would like to express my concern regarding the possibility of an overpass on Livingston Road. The problem is not Livingston. The problem is too much growth with poor infrastructure planning We keep building with little thought as to how the roads can handle all the new residents. At the moment Pine Ridge and Immokalee roads are already clogged with traffic heading for the highway and the estates. We need another entry/exit on 175 perhaps using Vanderbilt or the new road being extended to US41 for the new high school in North Naples. Add access to 75 from one of them and it would greatly improve traffic flow. An overpass will be detrimental to Carlton Lakes and Seed to Table. It is hard enough to maneuver now - I can't imagine how an overpass which will have 2 lanes in each direction is going to be an improvement. Will we lose access to our south entrance if we are traveling north On exiting the complex, will we have to use the north entrance and hope to safely crossover 3 lanes of traffic - 2 of which will be flying down an overpass Have you seen Livingston Road when it turns into Imperial Parkway. It narrows to two lanes in each direction and is frequently backed up for miles, especially when 75 is backed up. The improvement needs to be done on the east/west corridors, not north/south. How has there not been a forum for us to meet with the planners and express our concern before now. Keep in mind many if us work, so an evening town hall would have been appreciated Ms. Adamski, I apologize for not replying to your message sooner. It was removed from my in -bin by our IT department for security reasons and then forwarded to my Junk Mail. After speaking with Mr. Stoia this morning, I checked my Junk Mail and contacted IT Security to release the email. We met on Friday with representatives from Carlton Lakes to discuss the options in the area. We are also planning to host a virtual type meeting for this corridor study in the future. Please note that this is the public involvement phase of the corridor study. No final decision has been made. We appreciate your input and will add them to the project documentation and public record. Thank you. Respectfully, Lorraine [screenshot of email in junk folder] Mr. Gordon, I apologize for not replying to your message sooner. It was removed from my in -bin by our IT department for security reasons and then forwarded to my Junk Mail. After speaking with Mr. Stoia this morning, I checked my Junk Mail and contacted IT Security to release the email. We met on Friday with representatives from Carlton Lakes to discuss the options in the area. We are also planning to host a virtual type meeting for this corridor study in the future. Please note that this is the public involvement phase of the corridor study. No final decision has been made. We appreciate your input and will add them to the project documentation and public record. Thank you. Respectfully, Lorraine [screenshot of email in junk folder] Ms. O'Toole, We are currently working on scheduling a meeting with Carlton Lakes to discuss the Study. Please note that this is the public involvement phase of the corridor study. No final decision has been made. We appreciate your input and will add them to the project documentation and public record. As a reminder, we have placed a narrated video presentation on our project website to assist with understanding the Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study. Linktovideo: https://collier.granicus.com/player/clip/3004?view_id=4&redirect=true 31 Person 4/16/2021 Joyce Zub Y Requested a meeting <<attached Letter with signatures from Carlton Lakes residents>> <<refer to attachment for coordination on Virtual Meeting scheduled> 6of9 8/5/2021 32 Phone 33 Email Email 2: Email 1: Lorraine Marius Stoia askmarius@gmail.com Y Email 2: Thank you for sending me this information. As I've mentioned to you last week, in our phone conversation, I've already spoke with Email 1: Good afternoon, 5/12/21 5/11/2021 Lantz Nicole Harris, but I'll definitely like to follow their events and updates. Your study proposal could be fundamentally influenced by theirs. Even I am forwarding the correspondence below from the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) regarding their 1-75 South Corridor project and Virtual Email 4: Email 3: you might have separate teams and goals to a certain point, our traffic system is just one, and it has no state or county boundaries, therefore Public Meeting invitation to you based on your interest in the Collier County Immokalee Road Congestion Corridor Study. The Collier County Study is being 5/13/21 5/13/21 both your solutions must complement each other. coordinated with the FDOT project; however it is important to note that the Collier County study is a separate study with different milestones, timelines and Email 5: requirements. If you have any questions regarding the FDOT project, please contact the 1-75 Project Manager, Ms. Nicole Harris, P.E., at (863) 519-2335 or via 5/14/21 Email 4: I'm glad we've got this clarified, names can be confusing sometimes. Also, I hope our neighborhood petition, the one Joyce Zub e-mail at nicole.harris@dot.state.fl.us. You may also visit the project website at: https://www.swflinterstates.com/i75-south-corridor. dropped in person at your office on April 16th, 2021, has been added to your project documentation and it will be introduced to the Board As always, if you have any questions regarding the Collier County Immokalee Road Congestion Corridor Study, you may contact me at members as well. Thank you again. Lorraine.Lantz@CollierCountyFL.gov or at 239-252-5779. You may also visit the Collier County Study website at: https://www.colliercountyfl.gov/planningstudies (under "Current — Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study"). Email 3: Thank you for your comments, we will include them in the project documentation. It also clarifies who you spoke to at FDOT, as our coordination has never included anyone named Natalie. Email 5: Yes, all written comments I become part of the public record and will be included in the documentation. 5/13/2021 5/13/2021 Lorraine Angela Morcos angele.morcos@gmail.com Y I've learned that collier county is looking to make modifications to the intersection of Immokalee and Livingston. Are there ressources or plans I hope the information below regarding the Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study provides you with the requested information. Lantz that can be shared? As a resident of the area, Id like to better understand what these changes are. Intersections Studied Nine intersections are being studied along the corridor (labeled "A" through "I"). Please reference the project aerial with highlighted squares for the location of each intersection. The following summarizes the recommended solution for each intersection. •A: Livingston Rd. —Convert to a Single Point Urban Interchange (SPUI) commonly known as an Overpass. The recommendation is to bridge Livingston Road over Immokalee Road. The bridge is proposed as 4lanes (2 lanes in each direction). An additional southbound left turn at Livingston Road is also proposed. Through traffic along Livingston Road would not be required to stop, improving the traffic operations at this intersection. This is similar to the intersection at Golden Gate Parkway and Airport Road, where Golden Gate Parkway goes over Airport Road. •B: Juliet Blvd./Strand Blvd. — Widen the bridge along the southbound side of intersection, add turn lanes and increase the length of the left turn lanes. •C and D: 1-75 Interchange (Southbound and Northbound On/Off Ramps 1-75) — Convert to a Diverging Diamond Interchange (DDI). For this recommendation traffic patterns will only change along Immokalee Road; there will be no change to the traffic pattern on I-75. Traffic on Immokalee Road will shift (or diverge) to the opposite side of the road as it passes under 1-75 and will be controlled by a traffic signal. A DDI configuration is unusual in that it requires traffic to briefly drive on the opposite side of the road (in this case while under 1-75). Large overhead signs, barriers and/or pavement markings will be used to direct traffic. DDIs are becoming more popular in Florida, as they are an innovative solution to reduce delay and increase mobility and safety. There is a fully operational DDI at 1-75 and University Parkway in Sarasota. FDOT is currently constructing a DDI at 1-75 and Colonial Boulevard in Fort Myers. •E: Northbrooke Dr./Tarpon Bay Blvd. — Widen the bridge along the southbound side of intersection, add turn lanes and increase the length of the left turn lanes. •F: Oakes Blvd. — Restripe existing lanes to add through/right turn lane and increase the length of the left turn lanes. •G: Valewood Dr. — Restripe existing lanes to add through/right turn lane and dedicated right turn lane. •H: Executive Dr. — Restripe existing lanes to add through/right turn lane. •I: Logan Blvd. — Reconstruct the intersection to include a Partial Displaced Left Turn (PDLT) also known as a Continuous Flow Intersection (CFI) along Immokalee Road. The PDLT reconfigures the roadway by allowing vehicles to cross to the left side of the roadway before the intersection, which allows for multiple traffic movements that are not possible at conventional signalized intersections. This improvement will increase signal efficiency by allowing for longer green times at each leg of the intersection. 34 Email 5/21/2021 5/21/2021 Lorraine Lori luviim737@gmail.com N I am a resident of Carlton Lakes, I am writing you in regards to the Immokalee Rd., Corredor study. I know congestion on Immokalee Road is Thank you for your comments. We will try to incorporate responses to your concerns into the presentation on 5/27/21. If you have not already done so, you Lantz an issue... My thoughts and concerns of traffic over the years, are due in part to the lack of an on/off ramp at 175 & Vanderbilt, is causing an may register for the presentation at the following link: https:Hurldefense.com/v3/_https://www.eventbrite.com/e/immokalee-road-corridor-congestion- extra undue burden to Immokalee as well as Pine Ridge. study -virtual -public -information -meeting -registration - I feel that Collier Counties consideration of building an overpass on Livingston Rd., which is a residential access road, will cause (extreme) noise 154470219585_;!!BScixuoO7ltTeg!REmu2joauc36bjGdiKm2H5XzgL8NmebMZ9iYec3quj2jEu9usCv7ZymK7LghB3kS6Yc5xw$ pollution, a concrete eyesore, as well as a property devaluation for all the adjacent residential communities! I also, do not believe that an overpass and lane expansion, will just alleviate traffic as it will cause an increase since, this proposed project will be the largest gateway for east and west bound commuters in north Naples. The vast majority of the traffic is due in part by are snowbirds and vacationers, traffic in general is only at its worst January -April! Thank you for your time! 35 Email 5/24/2021 5/24/2021 Lorraine Mark dogci1@centurvlink.net Lantz and Myslibors Cindy ki To Collier County, I'm writing to you In hopes that you will be as concerned as we the home owners living in the communities on Valewood Dr. The cut through from Executive Dr. onto Valewood dr. is a very dangerous and concerning situation... Last year my husband and I was one of those victims.. Three days later coming down Valewood to go to the doctors, I couldn't believe it another accident occurred taking the ladies car door off was really bad.... I'm sure if you check last years, and this years police reports there are many. From people doing U turns on the left side of valewood back onto executive dr.To people doing U turns at the light on Immokalee, where it clearly says no U turns. People turning off of Valewood onto Immokalee cause they have the right away, not expecting someone to do a U turn at the light.. Bang... Drivers for some reason cannot read or obey the law there!!!! It really is just a matter of time before it becomes more than an accident to a tragedy... Last week a car came across executive dr. with no stop at all, putting the other car coming down Valewood into the utility road, she was ok, driver from executive dr. didn't even stop or look she was on her cell phone ... Close.. Maybe a solution would be to close the cut through as was done on the Strand, Executive dr. than can make a right turn , go down and than enter valewood dr. Executive dr. also has access to Immokalee at mobile station, making a right, than a right at light to Valewood dr. if that's where they need to be.... Something has to be addressed in this very dangerous situation, PLEASE HELP .. Also the landscaping coming up Valewood where the ginger is planted is to high, for cars to have a clear view of executive dr. before they get there. Same with coming out of executive dr. I have a signed petition from some homeowners with the same concerns.. We are all concerned for the well being of drivers and their lives, leaving or coming into this community!!! Thank you Mark and Cindy Mysliborski Note; will be sending signed petition with 2 part letter. Thank you for your comments on our study. I have also forwarded your comments and the petition to our Traffic Operations Department. If they have any additional information, they will reach out to you. 70f9 8/5/2021 . I. . Address/Contact Info Content, if applicable (excerpts) Response (excerpts) 36 Email 6/1/2021 6/2/2021 Lorraine Tom cc: David tebrver@vahoo.com N Lorraine Thank you for your comments. Yes, they will be added to the project documentation and the public record. Lantz Bryer Appleby, M I listened to the virtual public meeting for the Livingston Immokalee redesign and make the following comments: Thomas dwapplebvir@amail.com 1. It was stated as part of the presentation that our consultant found that the proposed signal at the north entrance did not meet signal The Collier County Chief Engineer met with Carlton Lakes representatives and your consultant to discuss the Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis. The conclusion of Wonsiewi tiwons@me.com warrants. It is my understanding that our consultant did find existing volumes at the north entrance to be insufficient to warrant a signal. that meeting was that traffic signal warrants at the intersection of Carlton Lakes Blvd., Delasol Ln. and Livingston Rd. were not met. cz, Tony tcirosr@comcast.net However, due to the difficulties currently trying to turn left at the north entrance, many CL residents use the south exit and use the U turn lane Ciros, ilesturner@amail.com to go south on Livingston. I believe the consultant study indicated that should a signal be added to the north entrance, there would be Please note that this project is the Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study from Livingston Road to Logan Boulevard. The maps, graphics and proposed Geoff bibrver@hotmail.com sufficient diversion of the south exitingU turn movements to the safe exiting north exit to warrant a signal at the north entrance. g g concepts shown and on our website, are to help demonstrate the conceptual design. The Board of County Commissioners will have an opportunity to approve P P P g tY PP tY PP Lies, 2. In my opinion, the proposed Livingston overpass design will CREATE a dangerous maneuver for those CL residents using the U turn lane to the Study and the recommendations. If the recommendations move forward, the County will work to fund the next phase in the capital improvement budget. Barbara go south on Livingston. Currently, the Immokalee-Livingston traffic signal creates large gaps to northbound Livingston traffic making it The next phase for the Immokalee Rd. and Livingston Rd. intersection is design. Bryer somewhat easy and safe for CL traffic to move over to the inside thru lane to make the U turn. However, with the proposed design, gaps will be more random and unpredictable because Livingston traffic will be free flow. Compounding the problem, Livingston traffic will increase due to Please let me know if you have any additional questions. continued development along Livingston plus some diversion from 1-75 traffic due to the overpass. Speeds on Livingston northbound should also increase due to the overpass, and coupled with reduced sight distance associated with the over vertical on Livingston will increase the potential severity and frequency of crashes involving weaving CL residents. The option of shifting the U turn lane further north to provide increased length for the CL weave maneuver across the 2 thru Livingston lanes is restricted by the current left turn lane at the north entrance and in my opinion is inadequate to address the weaving concerns stated above. I urge Collier County to rethink the design of the Immokalee-Livingston intersection so that safety is not compromised for Carlton Lakes residents. I trust that these comments can be made part of the public comments. Tom Bryer PS -Prior to retirement I was Director PennDOT Bureau of Highway Safety and Traffic Engineering. After PennDOT, as a consultant, I also developed a statewide intersection safety plan for Florida DOT. 37 Email 6/8/2021 6/18/2021 Michelle Mark doaci1@centurvlink.net N Hi Lorraine, I wrote to you a couple of weeks ago in reference to Valewood dr. and executive dr. Well there has been another accident today. I Mr. Mysliborski Scavone Myslibor hate to disrupt the plantings that the communities put so much into,. But you really have to drive from Quail village, Longshore Lakes, to head Code Enforcement Supervisor Short made a site visit and observed the vegetation in question. Although the landscaping is maintained to code, staff did see an ski out. Than you'll see how tall the plants are that traffic from executive can't see nor can we . I watched a lady the other day inch out stretching area that could use improvement to assist in addressing the concern. Staff researched the ownership and have made contact with Quail Creek HOA, one of the her neck to see past plantings. I think it could help some, but not fix the dangerous issue coming across executive onto Valewood. It just a very five associations who maintains the vegetation on Valewood Drive. The landscaping vendor has been instructed to trim down the vegetation in the center of dangerous right away..... the median and they confirmed the work will be conducted. Thank you On Behalf of Cristina Perez, Code Enforcement Investigative Supervisor Sent from Mail for Windows 10 Michelle Scavone, Operations Coordinator 38 Email 5/18/2021 5/18/2021 Lorraine Larry & Beer Iandlbeer@aol.com Y Ms. Lance, attached are our comments on the proposed bridge. Thank you for your indulgence. Mr. Beer, Lantz Linda Larry Beer, long time resident of Carlton Lakes when Livingston was a gravel strip between Immokalee and Imperial. Thank you for your questions. We will try to incorporate them into the presentation on 5/27/21. Please feel free to follow-up after the presentation. <<attachment included>> 39 Email 5/25/2021 5/26/2021 Lorraine Lantz Debbie Littman deb.lakeview@amail.com Y Dear Lorraine, Ms. Littman, I just received these questions. If it is not too late and if not redundant, could someone also address these questions. Thank you for forwarding these questions to us. Many seem similar to the questions we received. We will try to address them directly in the presentation. I am looking forward to your program on Thursday; Sincerely, Debbie Littman, President Carlton Lakes 1.Has a traffic noise study been completed to determine the impact of the overpass on surrounding communities at the Livingston & Immokalee intersection? 2.Will noise barrier walls be installed on the overpass? 3.How will a driver access the South -bound lanes on Livingston from both the North & South Carlton Lakes Blvd gates? oWill the existing U-turn lane located on Livingston North of Carlton Lakes Blvd - South Main Gate remain? oW ill a traffic light be installed at Carlton Lake Blvd- North Gate & Livingston for left turns to access South bound Livingston lanes due to the projected increase in traffic? 4.Will there still be a left turn lane from South -bound Livingston to enter Carlton Lakes Blvd South Main Gate entrance for residents & vendors that must use the entry code kiosk? S.Please see attached photo. What do the three red -dashed lines mean? The middle line, which is not identified with a letter bisects our carport and building. Will vehicles be visible at this point? 40 Email Email 1: Email 2: Lorraine Lantz Bob Strutzel robs5230@amail.com Y Email 1: When you are ready to send us pictures (jpeg)of the road layouts presented at the meeting, please send them to me at robs5230@gmail.com, and Email 2: Mr. Strutzel and Ms. Littman, 5/5/2021 5/5/2021 deb.lakeview@amail.com not the att.net address I gave you at the meeting.Thank you Thank you for your email. We are working on reducing the size and format and will send it to you. Email 3: Email 4: Bob Strutzel We are also working on the meeting format for your residents. We did not really discuss the logistics on Friday. We were wondering how many people do you anticipate 5/5/21 5/6/21 logging in and attending/participating? For format, we were thinking of an overview discussion of the project, then we could respond to any questions that you prepare for Email 3: Dear Lorraine, us in advance and then open it to additional resident questions. We could take comments in a chat box type format. What format are your residents accustomed to with We have been using Zoom meetings with the chat box for the past year; so residents are familiar with the process. We could have anywhere from 30 to your Board meetings? Are those virtual also? 50+ people. If we solicit pre -meeting questions, we might be able to gauge participation. Please let me know what your residents expect from the meeting so we can develop it appropriately. We also do sessions in the clubhouse with the ability to project documents on the screen if you would prefer that format. Your format should work well for the program. When we settle on a date, Do you have a preference of date and time? Email 4: Ms. Littman, Sincerely, We are coordinating with our communications group for available dates. We were anticipating having it virtually in the evening, possible times would be from 6:00 pm to Debbie Littman, President 8:00 pm. Assuming some of your residents work and need to commute home, however we are flexible. If your residents are used to a certain time for meetings (earlier, Carlton Lakes later, etc.) we would be happy to accommodate that. Typically we do not have meetings on a Friday, however if your community is used to that, we will accommodate. If you would prefer during the day instead of the evening, we can accommodate that as well. I think it would help if we had questions from your residents in advance that way we can develop a presentation to address those questions and then allow the moderatorto receive the additional questions in the chat box. I anticipate many of the questions would be about the same general topics we discussed last week. 8of9 8/5/2021 41 Email 42 Email 43 Email 7/2/2021 7/2/2021 Lorraine Lantz Marius Stoia askmarius(a1¢mail.com N <<email in response to email blast 7/2/21>> Thank you Lorraine, Again, I really appreciate your openness and honesty, and thank you for hearing me out. I'm sure your colleague wasn't very pleased with my passionate expose, but you cannot please everyone. Too bad he doesn't live on my street, he would probably have had a total different opinion than he has now. It's easy to ignore what doesn't affect you and try to justify your argument just from a unilateral point of view. Fairness and correctness comes from including all possible aspects and factors into the equation, not choosing only those that support one's theory. I guess we'll march on, each on his own path and hopefully by the end common sense will prevail. Have a great weekend and a happy 4th!us Sincerely, Marius Stoia Email 1: Email 2: Lorraine Lantz Mark Trepanier MTreoanierc@AstonGardens.c Y Email 1: Good Afternoon Mrs. Lantz, 7/21/2021 7/22/2021 om I hope this email finds you well. I am the Executive Director at Aston Gardens at Pelican Marsh. I have a few questions about section A of the Immokalee Email 3: Email 4: Corridor Study. 7/22/21 7/23/21 Our community is just south of the intersection in question. We are trying to determine how this will impact our two entrances and exits. One on Email S: Email 6: Immokalee and another on Livingston. 7/23/21 7/26/21 Is there a time when I could call you to ask a few clarification questions? I know you must be extremely busy and would like approximately 15-20 minutes Email B: Email 7: ofyour time. 7/27/21 Please let me know what works for your schedule. Thank you in advance. Email 3: Thank you for the quick response. Could we meet in person next Tuesday morning? Anytime between 8.30 am and Noon. I could go to your office if that is easier. Email 5: Yes that would be perfect. I can go to your office, we are having some upgrades done to our offices. Email 8: Thank you for the meeting this week. It was very helpful. I will be following up with any additional questions and with Diana relative to signage. Our neighbor from St. Croix at Pelican Marsh is Joe Mathura, he is Association Manager. His contact information is: Email: stcroix@presidiocondo.com Phone: (239) 593-3434 7/21/2021 7/22/2021 Lorraine Lantz Mark Mysilborsk do¢ci IPcenturvlink.net Y Good morning Lorraine, I was wondering if someone could look at the conditions of Valewood dr. in need of some road repairs,and pot holes... Is there anytime in the future of resurfacing road? It is pretty beat up!!! Mr. Stoia, We understand this is personal to you and we want to try to answer your questions. We do not have definite answers to some of your questions because it is not the appropriate phase of the project to do the analysis. While our process may be lengthy, I can assure you that if the project moves forward from conceptual to actual design your questions regarding height, aesthetics, cost, construction time, etc. will be answered more definitively than the estimates we have discussed. One of your comments on Friday was that we did not look at or consider any other alternatives at the intersection of Livingston Rd. and Immokalee Rd. We had our consultant use the Intersection Control Evaluation (ICE) analysis which Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) considers a Best Practice. The analysis looked at the following types of intersections for all of the intersections in the corridor: ®Diverging Diamond Interchange — runn ing North -South ®Diverging Diamond Interchange — runn ing East-West ®Single Point Urban Interchange — also known as an Overpass — running North -South ®Single Point Urban Interchange (Overpass) — running East-West ®Displaced Left Turn ®Displaced Left Tu rn (interchange) — running North -South ®Displaced Left Tu rn (interchange) — running East-West ®Partial Displaced Left Tu rn — running North -South ®Partial Displaced Left Turn— running East-West ®Partial Median U-Turn — running North -South ®Traffic Signal (Conventional signal improvements) ®Echelon — running North -South ]No -Build Please let me know if you have any additional questions. Email 2: Thank you for reaching out to me. We would welcome the opportunity to either meet with you in person or virtually so we can show you some maps and explain our conceptual plans. Are you available Monday (between 9am-2:30pm) or Tuesday (all day) next week? Email 4: Would loam Tuesday work for you? We can come to your office if that is easier. Email 6: Our address is: 2685 S. Horseshoe Drive, Suite #103, Naples, FL 34104. We will see you here tomorrow at loam. Email 7: It was a pleasure meeting with you this morning. We hope we were able to provide you with a better understanding of the Immokalee Corridor Study and answer your questions. Please feel free to contact me with any additional questions you may have. Regarding Aston Gardens Signage, please contact Diana Compagnone in Operations and Regulations. She is a Plan Reviewer specifically dedicated to signage. Her contact information is: 239-252-2429 or Diana.Compagnone@CollierCountyFL.gov Mr. Mysliborski, Thank you for contacting me. I have forwarded this to the appropriate department to review and respond to your question. They will respond to you directly. 9of9 8/5/2021 From: Lantz Lorraine To: Kirby, Felicia Subject: [EXTERNAL] FW: Congestion on Immokalee Date: Tuesday, March 23, 2021 11:13:14 AM FYI Lorraine M. Lantz, AICP Principal Planner Collier County Capital Projects, Planning, Impact Fees & Program Management NOTE: Email Address Has Changed 2685 S. Horseshoe Drive, Suite #103 Naples, FL 34104 Phone: (239) 252-5779 Lorraine.Lantz@CollierCountyFL.gov -----Original Message ----- From: LantzLorraine Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2021 11:11 AM To: 'Jeff Rodgers' <jrodgers@dekalbplastics.com> Subject: RE: Congestion on Immokalee Mr. Rodgers, Thank you for your comments. They will be added to the project record. Respectfully, Lorraine Lorraine M. Lantz, AICP Principal Planner Collier County Capital Projects, Planning, Impact Fees & Program Management NOTE: Email Address Has Changed 2685 S. Horseshoe Drive, Suite #103 Naples, FL 34104 Phone: (239) 252-5779 Loffaine.Lantz@CollierCountyFL.gov -----Original Message ----- From: Jeff Rodgers <jrodgers@dekalbplastics.com> Sent: Monday, March 22, 2021 8:27 PM To: LantzLorraine <Lorraine.Lantz@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: Congestion on Immokalee EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Stop building east of 1-75!!!! Jeff Rodgers 260-341-5800 Sent from my iPhone Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. From: LantzLorraine To: Kirby, Felicia Subject: [EXTERNAL] FW: Immokalee Road Congestion Study Response Date: Wednesday, March 24, 2021 9:53:45 AM fyi Lorraine M. Lantz, AICP Principal Planner Q -ICY 007414ty Collier County Capital Projects, Planning, Impact Fees & Program Management NOTE: Email Address Has Changed 2685 S. Horseshoe Drive, Suite #103 Naples, FL 34104 Phone: (239) 252-5779 Lorraine.Lantz@CollierCountyFL.gov From: LantzLorraine Sent: Wednesday, March 24, 2021 9:52 AM To: 'd3blaser@gmail.com' <d3blaser@gmail.com> Subject: Immokalee Road Congestion Study Response Mr. Blaser, Thank you for your comments regarding the Immokalee Road Congestion Study, they will be added to the project report. In response to your questions, please note that the Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study was performed to analyze the existing and future traffic conditions along the Immokalee Road corridor between Livingston Road and Logan Boulevard. The study reviewed both the existing traffic volumes and the anticipated traffic growth by the year 2040. Based on the growth projections, feasible corridor improvements were evaluated which would efficiently and effectively accommodate the projected growth by reducing delay and congestion and improving overall corridor operations. Collier County is currently working to alleviate some of the congestion on both Immokalee Road and Pine Ridge Road by completing the Vanderbilt Beach Road Extension (VBR Ext.). The VBR Ext. construction project is to create a new east/west facility from the existing VBR approximately 7 miles east (Collier Blvd. to 16th St. NE.). This project is in the final stage of design and construction is scheduled to begin in fiscal year 2022. In addition, a new interchange on 1-75 at Everglades Blvd. was pursued by Collier County Transportation Planning approximately 10 years ago. The Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) did not support the new interchange request and recommended that Collier County conduct further evaluations of other roadway improvements and projects to reduce the travel times associated with accessing 1-75. That project information and status can be found on the Transportation Planning's website under the dropdown 'Past - I- 7S/Everglades Blvd Interchange Justification Report (2013)' under Past Planning Studies. https://www.colliercountyfl.gov/your-government/divisions-s-z/transportation-planning/planning- studies " Please let me know if you have any additional questions. Respectfully, Lorraine Lorraine M. Lantz, AICP Principal Planner C;o#ie. rC,014ftty Collier County Capital Projects, Planning, Impact Fees & Program Management NOTE: Email Address Has Changed 2685 S. Horseshoe Drive, Suite #103 Naples, FL 34104 Phone: (239) 252-5779 Lorraine. Lantz@CollierCountyFL.aov From: Dean Blaser <d3blaser(@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 20218:26 AM To: LantzLorraine <Lorraine.Lantz(@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: Response EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. I'm sure what you are proposing will help move the traffic along faster on Immokalee Rd but with increased traffic do to growth in eastern Collier county you will face the same problem five years from now. Seems you need another access to 75 other than Immokalee. A outer belt looping into eastern collier cty, or extending Pine Ridge something to decrease the flow with only one access. Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. From: LantzLorraine To: Kirby. Felicia Subject: [EXTERNAL] FW: Immokalee Rd Date: Tuesday, March 23, 2021 3:31:07 PM FYI Lorraine M. Lantz, AICP Principal Planner Q -ICY 007414ty Collier County Capital Projects, Planning, Impact Fees & Program Management NOTE: Email Address Has Changed 2685 S. Horseshoe Drive, Suite #103 Naples, FL 34104 Phone: (239) 252-5779 Lorraine.Lantz@CollierCountyFL.gov From: LantzLorraine Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 20213:31 PM To: 'Cheryl Nunes' <secatropix@gmail.com> Subject: RE: Immokalee Rd Ms. Nunes, Thank you for your comments. They will be added to the project record. The recommended improvement for the Immokalee/Livingston Intersection is a Grade Separated Intersection commonly referred to as an overpass. The proposed conceptual design is to have Livingston Road go over Immokalee Road. This is similar to how Golden Gate Parkway currently goes over Airport Rd. The Board of County Commissioners (BCC) must first approve the current Planning Study and recommendations. That is tentatively scheduled for May. Once the recommendations are approved, additional phases of the corridor improvements will begin to be programmed and added to the County's Work Program. The next phase will likely be the Design which will evaluate the technical and engineering issues at the intersection. Respectfully, Lorraine Lorraine M. Lantz, AICP Principal Planner o 16-r 074*lty Collier County Capital Projects, Planning, Impact Fees & Program Management NOTE: Email Address Has Changed 2685 S. Horseshoe Drive, Suite #103 Naples, FL 34104 Phone: (239) 252-5779 Lorraine. Lantz@CollierCountyFL.aov From: Cheryl Nunes <secatropix(@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2021 3:00 PM To: LantzLorraine <Lorraine.Lantz(@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: Immokalee Rd EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. I live in Carlton Lakes, off immokalee and Livingston ..... pls consider an overpass like at Airport and Golden Gate Thankyou Cheryl Nunes Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. From: Lantz Lorraine To: Kirby, Felicia Subject: [EXTERNAL] FW: Immokalee Road Study Date: Tuesday, March 23, 2021 4:19:32 PM fyi Lorraine M. Lantz, AICP Principal Planner Collier County Capital Projects, Planning, Impact Fees & Program Management NOTE: Email Address Has Changed 2685 S. Horseshoe Drive, Suite #103 Naples, FL 34104 Phone: (239) 252-5779 Lorraine.Lantz@CollierCountyFL.gov -----Original Message ----- From: LantzLorraine Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2021 4:19 PM To: 'Martin Sullivan' <mrsully 1 @aol.com> Subject: RE: Immokalee Road Study Mr. Sullivan, Glad to help. Feel free to contact me if you have any additional comments or questions. Please note that your comments will be added to the project record. Respectfully, Lorraine Lorraine M. Lantz, AICP Principal Planner Collier County Capital Projects, Planning, Impact Fees & Program Management NOTE: Email Address Has Changed 2685 S. Horseshoe Drive, Suite #103 Naples, FL 34104 Phone: (239) 252-5779 Loffaine.Lantz@CollierCountyFL.gov -----Original Message----- From: Martin Sullivan <mrsullyl@aol.com> Sent: Monday, March 22, 2021 4:51 PM To: LantzLorraine <Lorraine.Lantz@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: Re: Immokalee Road Study EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Thank you very much. I never would have come up with that! Sent from my iPad > On Mar 22, 2021, at 4:47 PM, LantzLorraine <Lorraine.Lantz@colliercountyfl.gov> wrote: > Mr. Sullivan, > A SPUI is the acronym for a Single Point Urban Interchange. It is commonly known as an overpass. > Respectfully, > Lorraine > Lorraine M. Lantz, AICP > Principal Planner > Collier County Capital Projects, Planning, Impact Fees & Program Management > NOTE: Email Address Has Changed > 2685 S. Horseshoe Drive, Suite #103 > Naples, FL 34104 > Phone: (239) 252-5779 > Lorraine.Lantz@CollierCountyFL.gov > -----Original Message ----- > From: Martin Sullivan <mrsullyl@aol.com> > Sent: Monday, March 22, 2021 4:38 PM > To: LantzLorraine <Lorraine.Lantz@colliercountyfl.gov> > Subject: Immokalee Road Study > EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. > What is a "SPUI"? > Martin Sullivan > Sent from my iPad > Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. From: LantzLorraine To: Kirby. Felicia Subject: [EXTERNAL] FW: Immokalee Rd Study Date: Thursday, March 25, 2021 2:59:14 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. FYI Lorraine M. Lantz, AICP Principal Planner v -per 0v4*1ty Collier County Capital Projects, Planning, Impact Fees & Program Management NOTE: Email Address Has Changed 2685 S. Horseshoe Drive, Suite #103 Naples, FL 34104 Phone: (239) 252-5779 Lorraine. Lantz@CollierCountyFL.aov From: LantzLorraine Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2021 2:59 PM To: 'Paul Shea' <sheapr1948@gmail.com> Subject: RE: Immokalee Rd Study Mr. Shea, Thank you for the compliment on the video. Our team worked hard to put that together. We are also trying to update the website to clarify/explain the recommendations better. Respectfully, Lorraine Lorraine M. Lantz, AICP Principal Planner C;o*-ie,-rC;0-1414tY Collier County Capital Projects, Planning, Impact Fees & Program Management NOTE: Email Address Has Changed 2685 S. Horseshoe Drive, Suite #103 Naples, FL 34104 Phone: (239) 252-5779 Lorraine, Lantz@CollierCountyFL.aov From: Paul Shea <sheapr1948C@gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2021 12:47 PM To: LantzLorraine <Lorraine. Lantz(@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: Re: Immokalee Rd Study EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. I was able to watch the video and it was very helpful. My original comment was related to the few paragraphs you sent out. The video is a must see for residents. One suggestion would be to slow the speaker just a little for us older folks to keep up. Overall it was well done. Thank you Paul Shea On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 9:10 AM LantzLorraine <Lorraine. LantzPcolliercountyfl.gov> wrote: EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Mr. Shea, Thank you for your comments, we will add them to the project report. Were you able to watch the video presentation linked to the website? Link to video Immokalee Congestion Study Video Our intent in producing the video was to inform the public of the recommended improvements along the corridor. We understand that some of the recommended solutions are innovative. The video animations are intended to demonstrate how a vehicle moves through the more complicated intersections. As we revise and update the project information on the website, we will try to minimize the technical information. If there is anything about the study or the specific intersections you would like additional information on, please contact me and I would be more than happy to explain it. Thank you. Respectfully, Lorraine Lorraine M. Lantz, AICP Principal Planner [# 7 Y C01414t Collier County Capital Projects, Planning, Impact Fees & Program Management NOTE: Email Address Has Changed 2685 S. Horseshoe Drive, Suite #103 Naples, FL 34104 Phone: (239) 252-5779 Lorraine. Lantz@CollierCountyFL.aov From: Paul Shea <sheapr1948(@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, March 24, 2021 7:04 PM To: LantzLorraine <Lorraine.Lantz(@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: Immokolee Rd Study EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. We don't have a clue what all the jargon for improvements mean.Do you really expect us to to comment? Or am I missing some information ? Paul Shes Paul Shea "What have you done today that will make a difference tomorrow?" Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. Paul Shea "What have you done today that will make a difference tomorrow?" From: LantzLorraine To: Kirby. Felicia Subject: [EXTERNAL] FW: Immokalee Rd. Study Date: Tuesday, April 6, 2021 10:19:26 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. fyi Lorraine M. Lantz, AICP Principal Planner o Yer 0ounty Collier County Capital Projects, Planning, Impact Fees & Program Management NOTE: Email Address Has Changed 2685 S. Horseshoe Drive, Suite #103 Naples, FL 34104 Phone: (239) 252-5779 Lorraine. Lantz@ Col lierCountyFL. From: LantzLorraine Sent: Tuesday, April 6, 2021 10:19 AM To:'Marc Hoffman' <mahoff767@gmail.com> Subject: RE: Immokalee Rd. Study Mr. Hoffman, In response to your questions, please note that the Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study was performed to analyze the existing and future traffic conditions along the Immokalee Road corridor between Livingston Road and Logan Boulevard. Yes, we took peak season traffic impacts into consideration when modeling the various intersection types. The Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO's) Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) provides for the anticipated growth through 2040. Staff utilized the growth rates and land use data from the MPO's approved LRTP as well as the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) prepared and validated traffic model to determine the trips anticipated. This methodology is accepted in the transportation modeling industry. Collier County is currently working to alleviate some of the congestion on both Immokalee Road and Pine Ridge Road by completing the following projects: 9 Vanderbilt Beach Road Extension (VBR Ext.). The VBR Ext. construction project is to create a new east/west facility from the existing VBR approximately 7 miles east (Collier Blvd. to 16th St. NE.). This project is in the final stage of design and construction is scheduled to begin in fiscal year 2022. • VBR Ext. from 16th St. NE to Everglades Blvd. The continuation of the project listed above, will be moving into the design phase in fiscal year 2022. • VBR from East of US 41 to East of Goodlette-Frank Road. This road widening project will expand VBR from four to six lanes and extend approximately 1.8 miles from just east of US 41 to approximately the intersection of Vanderbilt Beach Road and Fontana Del Sol Way. The final design plans are expected to be completed late in 2021 and construction is slated to begin in 2022. • A study of the congestion on Pine Ridge Road from Livingston Rd. to Napa Blvd. was completed and approved in 2018. The recommended project at the intersection of Pine Ridge Rd. and Livingston Rd. was a Continuous Flow Intersection (CFI) which is scheduled for design in this fiscal year and construction beginning in fiscal year 2023. In addition, FDOT is currently working to evaluate the future needs of the interstate. The portion of the project that relates to Lee and Collier Counties is called the Southwest Connect 1-75 South Corridor. The status and schedule of the FDOT study can be found at this link: https://www.swflinterstates.com/i75-south-corridor/ FDOT's Planning and Feasibility study will evaluate strategies to improve both the mainline of 1-75 as well as the interchanges and is intended to identify and include potential modifications and requests for new interchanges. I encourage you to participate in that study as well. For long range planning the County looks to the Collier MPO, as mentioned above. The current LRTP was adopted in December 2020 and plans for projects through the year 2045. Some roads are identified in the LRTP needs plan, indicating that if funding were not an obstacle, those roads would be constructed or improved for the entire road network and infrastructure to be optimized; however, funding is always a consideration. The 2045 LRTP prioritizes the transportation needs of the county and allocates anticipated funds to projects. The projects that are determined to be cost feasible are then the projects that the agencies (jurisdictions/municipalities) work towards funding in their capital improvement budgets Only those projects that have anticipated funding through 2045 are included in the 2045 LRTP Cost Feasible Plan, therefore if a certain road project is not on the plan — it is not funded in the County's budget and is not listed in the County's work program. Collier Blvd. extension to the Lee County Line is one of those projects, listed on the LRTP Needs plan but not in the Cost Feasible Plan. The plan for Collier Blvd. Ext. is to build a new 2-lane facility which carries vehicles north and then west to connect to Logan Blvd. and then continue north (as the existing Logan Blvd.) to Bonita Beach Road. The Lee County MPO has listed this project (from the county line north to Corkscrew Road) on their needs plan, not cost feasible plan. This project has been discussed and included as a need in both MPO's respective LRTP's for many years, but it has environmental concerns as it is within the Density Reduction/Groundwater Resource Area (DR/GR) in Lee County. This environmentally sensitive land will likely create lengthy and costly challenges, if this project moves forward. I hope that this email provides you with the requested information. Thank you for your careful review of our project and for the comments and questions. We will take your comments into consideration and will incorporate them into the final planning study documentation. Respectfully, Lorraine Lorraine M. Lantz, AICP Principal Planner o ie.-r owtty Collier County Capital Projects, Planning, Impact Fees & Program Management NOTE: Email Address Has Changed 2685 S. Horseshoe Drive, Suite #103 Naples, FL 34104 Phone: (239) 252-5779 Lorraine. Lantz@CollierCountyFL.aov Lorraine M. Lantz, AICP Principal Planner From: Marc Hoffman <mahoff767(@gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2021 2:04 PM To: LantzLorraine <Lorraine.Lantz(cDcolliercountyfl.gov> Subject: Re: Immokalee Rd. Study EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Thank you very much, I did not see the link to the video presentation which is very helpful. My comments concern the assumptions used in making the future volume projections. In addition to looking at rush hour traffic is it safe to assume you looked at peak season traffic? Also, the current and near future growth in housing and commercial development further east on Immolalee Rd. and adjacent properties is dramatic and it would seem very difficult to predict growth further out to 2040. How much growth did you predict and is it a best case, worst case or most likely scenario? Lastly, it seems that more needs to be done to take traffic off of Immokalee, are there any other plans to do this? I know there are plans to extend Vanderbilt Beach further east but I would forsee that traffic using Logan to Immokalee to gain access to 1-75. Is it possible to have an i-75 interchange at Vanderbilt? Also, is there consideration to extending Collier Blvd. north to Bonita Beach Rd. Finally, given the limitations on how much you can do to improve Immokalee Rd., it would seem only prudent to stricktly limit further development to the east that would use the Immolalee Rd. corridor. Thank you for the opportunity to comment. On Thu, Mar 25, 2021 at 10:47 AM LantzLorraine <Lorraine. Lantzl@colliercountyfl.gov> wrote: EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. , Mr. Hoffman, Thank you for your comments, we will add them to the project report. Were you able to watch the video presentation linked to the website? Link to video Immokalee Congestion Study Video Our intent in producing the video was to inform the public of the recommended improvements along the corridor. We understand that some of the recommended solutions are innovative. The video animations are intended to demonstrate how a vehicle moves through the more complicated intersections. As we revise and update the project information on the website, we will try to minimize the technical information. The descriptions below are intended to help describe the innovative intersection design concepts. • Intersection A - Livingston Rd. — Convert to a Single Point Urban Interchange (SPUI) commonly known as an Overpass. The recommendation is for Livingston Road to go over (as a bridge) Immokalee Road (at -grade). This is similar to the Golden Gate Parkway / Airport Road Overpass. • Intersection C and D - 1-75 On/Off Ramps — Convert to a Diverging Diamond Interchange (DDI). Note — for this recommendation there will be no change to the traffic pattern on I- 75. The changes are how traffic along Immokalee Road shifts (or diverges) to the opposite side of the road at a traffic signal as it pass under 1-75. This configuration is unusual in that it requires traffic, while under 1-75, to briefly drive on the opposite side of the road. Large overhead signs, barriers and/or pavement markings will be used to direct traffic. These DDIs are innovative solutions to reduce delay and increase mobility and safety. There is a fully operational DDI at 1-75 and University Parkway in Sarasota. In addition, FDOT is constructing a DDI for the Colonial Blvd. interchange at 1-75 in Fort Myers, this location is also referred to as the Forum. • Intersection I - Logan Blvd. — Reconstruct the intersection to include a Partial Displaced Left Turn (PDLT) also known as a Continuous Flow Intersection (CFI) along Immokalee Rd. The PDLT reconfigures the roadway by allowing vehicles to cross to the left side of the roadway before the intersection. This allows for additional concurrent traffic movements not possible at a conventional signalized intersection. These additional concurrent movements increase signal efficiency and provide the opportunity for longer green times for all movements. If there is anything about the study or the specific intersections you would like additional information on, please contact me and I would be more than happy to try to explain them. As for public comment, there is a survey on our website as well as the video. https://www.colliercount)lfl.gov/your-government/divisions-s-z/transportation-planning/planning- studies After the public comment period, we will make revisions to the study as appropriate and then the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) will be requested to approve the Planning Study and recommendations. That is tentatively scheduled for May. When a final date is determined, it will be placed on the website. All BCC Meetings begin at 9:00 AM and are held in the BCC Chambers located on the 3rd Floor of the Collier County Government Center, 3299 Tamiami Trail East, Naples, FL 34112. Once the recommendations are approved, additional phases of the corridor improvements will begin to be programmed as funding becomes available and added to the County's Work Program. Thank you. Respectfully, Lorraine Lorraine M. Lantz, AICP Principal Planner C;o*je.-r Oonnty Collier County Capital Projects, Planning, Impact Fees & Program Management NOTE: Email Address Has Changed 2685 S. Horseshoe Drive, Suite #103 Naples, FL 34104 Phone: (239) 252-5779 Lorraine.Lantz@CollierCountvFL.gov From: Marc Hoffman <mahoff767Pgmail.com> Sent: Thursday, March 25, 2021 9:54 AM To: LantzLorraine <Lorraine.Lantz(@colliercount)lfl.gov> Subject: Immokalee Rd. Study EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. I read your summary of the Immokalee Road improvement study. You indicated there would be an opportunity for public comments. I would suggest you include definitions of what the proposed changes are, such as SPUI, DDI, and PLDT, so we know what you are talking about. Thankyou Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. From: LantzLorraine To: Kirby, Felicia Subject: [EXTERNAL] FW: Project B Date: Tuesday, March 30, 2021 4:17:45 PM Attachments: imaaeWlxnna EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. FYI Lorraine M. Lantz, AICP Principal Planner C;Ot-ICT C,01414ty Collier County Capital Projects, Planning, Impact Fees & Program Management NOTE: Email Address Has Changed 2685 S. Horseshoe Drive, Suite #103 Naples, FL 34104 Phone: (239) 252-5779 Lorraine.Lantz@CollierCountyFL.gov From: LantzLorraine Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 20214:17 PM To: 'Phyllis Crivelli' <jandperivelli@gmail.com> Subject: RE: Project B Dr. Crivelli, Thank you for your comments. In response, we had our engineers review and analyze your suggestion. Their analysis concluded that the addition of a second southbound right turn only lane at Strand Blvd. would not significantly benefit the intersection traffic operation. I have included an enlarged snap shot of the proposed intersection. We are proposing one right turn only and a right or straight lane to accommodate the movements. 0 k We thank you for your time and comments, as they will be added to the project report. Respectfully, Lorraine Lorraine M. Lantz, AICP Principal Planner Collier County Capital Projects, Planning, Impact Fees & Program Management NOTE: Email Address Has Changed 2685 S. Horseshoe Drive, Suite #103 Naples, FL 34104 Phone: (239) 252-5779 Lorraine.LantzCo)CollierCountyFL.gov -----Original Message ----- From: LantzLorraine Sent: Monday, March 29, 2021 8:12 AM To: 'Phyllis Crivelli' <jandperivelli(@gmail.com> Subject: RE: Project B Dr. Crivelli, Thank you for your comments. We will add them to the project record. Respectfully, Lorraine Lorraine M. Lantz, AICP Principal Planner Collier County Capital Projects, Planning, Impact Fees & Program Management NOTE: Email Address Has Changed 2685 S. Horseshoe Drive, Suite #103 Naples, FL 34104 Phone: (239) 252-5779 Lorraine.Lantz(cDCollierCountyFL.gov -----Original Message ----- From: Phyllis Crivelli <iandperivelli(@gmail.com> Sent: Saturday, March 27, 2021 10:10 AM To: LantzLorraine <Lorraine.Lantz(@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: Project B EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Rather than 4 lanes exiting Strand Boulevard, there should be 5 lanes consisting of 2 dedicated right lanes, one center cross lane and 2 dedicated left lanes for optimum traffic movement. Thank you for this opportunity to contribute my opinion. Dr. Joseph Crivelli Resident of the Strand 239 594 1148 Sent from my iPhone Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. From: LantzLorraine To: Kirby, Felicia Subject: [EXTERNAL] FW: Immokalee Road Congestion Study Date: Wednesday, March 31, 2021 2:23:44 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. FYI Lorraine M. Lantz, AICP Principal Planner v -per 0v4*1ty Collier County Capital Projects, Planning, Impact Fees & Program Management NOTE: Email Address Has Changed 2685 S. Horseshoe Drive, Suite #103 Naples, FL 34104 Phone: (239) 252-5779 Lorraine. Lantz@CollierCountyFL.aov From: LantzLorraine Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2021 2:21 PM To: 'Lynne Gorski' <gorski.lynne@gmail.com> Subject: RE: Immokalee Road Congestion Study Ms. Gorski, Thank you for the links. Yes, roundabouts can be an effective tool for traffic management. The Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) is currently working to evaluate the future needs of the interstate. The portion of FDOT's project that relates to Lee and Collier Counties is called the Southwest Connect 1-75 South Corridor. The status and schedule of the FDOT study can be found at this link: https://www.swflinterstates.com/i75-south-corridor/ FDOT's Planning and Feasibility study will evaluate strategies to improve both the mainline of 1-75 as well as the interchanges. I encourage you to participate in that study as well. In response to your question, according to the 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP), approved on 12/11/20, the extension of Collier Blvd. from where it currently terminates (north of Immokalee Rd.) to the Lee/Collier County Line as a new 2-lane facility is an unfunded need. That means that the project is recognized as a planning need, however there are no funds for construction between now and the horizon year of 2045. The LRTP is updated every 5 years and could be amended in the interim years, if funding becomes available. Please note that this project was also listed as an unfunded need in the 2040 LRTP. Please let me know if you have any additional questions. Thank you for your comments, we will add them to the project record. Respectfully, Lorraine Lorraine M. Lantz, AICP Principal Planner C;o#ie,-?-C,0T4fttY Collier County Capital Projects, Planning, Impact Fees & Program Management NOTE: Email Address Has Changed 2685 S. Horseshoe Drive, Suite #103 Naples, FL 34104 Phone: (239) 252-5779 Lorraine. Lantz@CollierCountyFL. From: Lynne Gorski <gorski.lynnel@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2021 9:25 AM To: LantzLorraine <Lorraine. Lantz(@colliercountyfl.g_ov> Subject: Immokalee Road Congestion Study EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Lorraine, Our northern home is in Hamilton County, Indiana. We have the largest number of roundabouts in the country (I'm not kidding.) https://www.visithamiItoncounty.com/plan/hamiIton-county-maps/roundabouts/ Many other communities from across the US have come to see the different varieties and methods for constructing roadways that include roundabouts, and elevated decking over roundabout type sub -roads, to manage our dramatic increase in traffic. Hamilton County is regularly voted among the top 10 places to live/work/raise a family by Forbes and many other publications so we have seen a massive growth in population and traffic over the last decade. It may be helpful for you guys to take a peek at the variety of solutions we have implemented in a situation similar to the Immokalee Road issue. It has been an enormous help. I for one, love roundabouts as they keep traffic moving and have greatly diminished congestion. Our Naples home is in Esplanade, at Immokalee and Collier. The dramatic growth in development east of Collier boulevard, especially with that new multi -use complex on the SE corner of Immokalee and Collier, coupled with all of the new housing developments east of there, is only going to make this issue worse. I know the original plan to take Collier north toward Bonita Beach Road was planned for 2040, but with the dramatic increase in population, we will desperately need another north/south artery to relieve congestion between Collier and and Logan, and even to 175 long before 2040. Are there any discussions to bring that project forward? I would also recommend that it be 4 lanes, and not 2 as was done on the Logan extension north to Bonita Beach. That is already undersized, with many delays because of slow moving traffic along there, and only 1 lane in each direction. Thanks for hearing my comments. Best, Lynne Lynne Gorski 317-698-0515 This message may have been composed using voice text. Please excuse any typos or grammatical errors as Siri is somewhat uncooperative at times. Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. From: LantzLorraine To: Kirby, Felicia Subject: [EXTERNAL] FW: Immokalee Road Date: Wednesday, March 31, 2021 2:36:54 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. FYI Lorraine M. Lantz, AICP Principal Planner o Yer 0ounty Collier County Capital Projects, Planning, Impact Fees & Program Management NOTE: Email Address Has Changed 2685 S. Horseshoe Drive, Suite #103 Naples, FL 34104 Phone: (239) 252-5779 Lorraine. Lantz@CollierCountyFL. From: LantzLorraine Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2021 2:36 PM To: 'Dale Horbal' <dalesaaa@gmail.com> Subject: RE: Immokalee Road Ms. Horbal, Information about the Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion study can be found on our website at the following link: https://www.colliercountyfl.gov/your-government/divisions-s-z/transportation- There is information about the project as well as a video which explains the process and the recommendations along the corridor. We understand that some of the recommended solutions are innovative. The video animations are intended to demonstrate how a vehicle moves through the more complicated intersections. Below the link to the video you will also find a link to the survey. I have also attached all links here for your convenience. Video Please click on the following link for a narrated presentation that further explains the recommended improvements at each intersection and other proposed improvements. Immokalee Congestion Study Video Link to video Survey Your feedback is important! Please click on the following link to complete a survey and provide comments on the recommended improvements. Link to survey Immokalee Congestion Study Survey Please let me know if I can help you with anything else. Respectfully, Lorraine Lorraine M. Lantz, AICP Principal Planner C;ot-ier Oonnty Collier County Capital Projects, Planning, Impact Fees & Program Management NOTE: Email Address Has Changed 2685 S. Horseshoe Drive, Suite #103 Naples, FL 34104 Phone: (239) 252-5779 Lorraine.Lantz@CollierCountyFL.aov From: Dale Horbal <dalesaaa(@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2021 1:19 PM To: LantzLorraine <Lorraine.Lantz(@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: Immokalee Road EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Lorraine, I was interested in taking the survey regarding the proposed work on Immokalee Road, we are residents of Longshore Lake. Can you forward me that link please? Thank you, Cheryl Horbal AAA Blind Factory Window Fashion Center 3940 Radio Road, #101 Naples, FL 34104 (239) 434-8188 Fax (239) 434-8447 dalesaaaPgmail.com Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. From: LantzLorraine To: Kirby. Felicia Subject: [EXTERNAL] FW: Immokalee corridor Date: Thursday, April 1, 2021 12:46:16 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. FYI Lorraine M. Lantz, AICP Principal Planner C;0#1�r 0074"ty Collier County Capital Projects, Planning, Impact Fees & Program Management NOTE: Email Address Has Changed 2685 S. Horseshoe Drive, Suite #103 Naples, FL 34104 Phone: (239) 252-5779 Lorraine. Lantz@CollierCountyFL. From: LantzLorraine Sent: Thursday, April 1, 2021 12:46 PM To: 'Barbara Thiele' <barbthiele@earthlink.net> Subject: RE: Immokalee corridor Ms. Thiele, Thank you for your comments. They will be added to the project record. Respectfully, Lorraine Lorraine M. Lantz, AICP Principal Planner C;o*-ie,-rC;0-1414tY Collier County Capital Projects, Planning, Impact Fees & Program Management NOTE: Email Address Has Changed 2685 S. Horseshoe Drive, Suite #103 Naples, FL 34104 Phone: (239) 252-5779 Lorraine, Lantz@CollierCountyFL.aov From: Barbara Thiele <barbthielePearthlink.net> Sent: Thursday, April 1, 2021 12:36 PM To: LantzLorraine <Lorraine.Lantz(@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: Immokalee corridor EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Ms. Lantz - I received info from my community regarding plans for the Immokalee Road corridor. PLEASE - let's put a STOP to all the building and development going on. It's out of control. That is why we have the traffic problem. Too much building. Naples is getting to be an over populated over grown city. No longer beautiful. Barbara Thiele of Longshore Lake Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. From: LantzLorraine To: Kirby, Felicia Subject: [EXTERNAL] FW: Executive drive and Valewood drive. Date: Friday, April 9, 2021 4:22:28 PM Attachments: innaae002.ono EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Lorraine M. Lantz, AICP Principal Planner COfe-r G014rit Collier County Capital Projects, Planning, Impact Fees & Program Management NOTE: Email Address Has Changed 2685 S. Horseshoe Drive, Suite #103 Naples, FL 34104 Phone: (239) 252-5779 Lorraine. La nt7Ca) C o I IierCou ntvFL.aov From: LantzLorraine Sent: Friday, April 9, 20214:22 PM To: 'Frank Nappo' <fnnaplesl@gmail.com> Subject: RE: Executive drive and Valewood drive. Mr. Nappo, I forwarded your comments to our Traffic Operations Department. If they have any additional information, they will reach out to you. Regarding the Immokalee Rd. Congestion Corridor Study recommendations at those intersections please see the graphic below. The recommendation is to restripe existing lanes to add through/right turn lane and increase the turn lane lengths. I A Respectfully, Lorraine Lorraine M. Lantz, AICP Principal Planner Cofer County Collier County Capital Projects, Planning, Impact Fees & Program Management NOTE: Email Address Has Changed 2685 S. Horseshoe Drive, Suite #103 Naples, FL 34104 Phone: (239) 252-5779 Lorra i ne. La ntz@ C o I IierC ou ntyFL.a ov From: LantzLorraine Sent: Thursday, April 1, 2021 11:52 AM To: 'Frank Nappo' <fnna len s1(@Rmail.com> Subject: RE: Executive drive and Valewood drive Mr. Nappo, Thank you for your comments regarding the Immokalee Rd. Corridor Congestion Study. I will forward them to the consultant for review and response, if appropriate. Your comments will be incorporation in the study report documentation. Respectfully, Lorraine Lorraine M. Lantz, AICP Principal Planner C over Count Collier County Capital Projects, Planning, Impact Fees & Program Management NOTE: Email Address Has Changed 2685 S. Horseshoe Drive, Suite #103 Naples, FL 34104 Phone: (239) 252-5779 Lorra i ne. Lo ntz@ C o I IierC ou ntyFL.aov From: Frank Nappo <fnna lep s1(cDgmail.com> Sent: Thursday, April 1, 2021 11:16 AM To: LantzLorraine <Lorraine.Lantz( colliercount fy I.gov> Subject: Executive drive and Valewood drive. EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. The situation we are experiencing is the same as the one corrected in the strand a few years ago. The cut through from executive drive capacity is one car and can not handle any of the larger vehicles and trailers.Therefore when traffic backs up to immokalee road Valewood drive is blocked in both directions.ie trailers blocking valewood going towards Palazzo. We are averaging an accident a week at this intersection .Members of longshore lake have been involved. We have a petition approaching 200 signatures to address this dangerous situation. The valewood cut through is also used for "U" turns as well. To complicate the situation traffic also crosses Valewood from the dead end utility drive location. At times you have cars crossing valewood drive from both directions. Lately the intersection of Valewood and Immokalee left lane is also being used as a "u"turn. A solution is to close the cut through as was done in the strand. Executive drive can be a right turn only. Executive drive has access to Immokalee at the mobile station. The cut through could be used as left hand turn to executive drive as well.We need help.Thank You Frank Nappo 239-250-8009 Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your a -mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. From: Lantz Lorraine To: Cheryl White Subject: [EXTERNAL] RE: Livingston overpass Date: Thursday, April 15, 2021 1:59:50 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Ms. White, As you are indicating, yes - sometimes improvements are not on the specific roadway that is experiencing the delays but as is the case with Vanderbilt Beach Road Ext. discussed previously, it will relieve multiple parallel east/west corridors. Regarding your suggestion for multiple new interchanges, that effort is being conducted by the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) as they maintain the interstate. FDOT is currently working on a study of the future needs of I-75 called the Southwest Connect I-75 South Corridor. The status and schedule of the FDOT study can be found at this link: htU2s://urldefense.com/v3/_htU2s://www.swflinterstates.com/i75-south- corridor/—:!! B5cixuoO7ltTeg! TTeS 1 FOdxKSilxj WIeZ6wso4R- IM3nccAo2_1LMWJOw8v2GLe7djgYa NEXW7xuwPgdFw$ FDOT's Planning and Feasibility study will evaluate strategies to improve both the mainline of I-75 as well as the interchanges and is intended to identify and include potential modifications and requests for new interchanges. I encourage you to participate in that study. I hope that this email provides you with the requested information. Thank you for your careful review of our project. We will take your comments into consideration and will incorporate them into the final planning study documentation. Please let me know if you have any additional comments or questions. Respectfully, Lorraine Lorraine M. Lantz, AICP Principal Planner Lorraine M. Lantz, AICP Principal Planner Collier County Capital Projects, Planning, Impact Fees & Program Management NOTE: Email Address Has Changed 2685 S. Horseshoe Drive, Suite #103 Naples, FL 34104 Phone: (239) 252-5779 Loffaine.Lantz@CollierCountyFL.gov -----Original Message ----- From: Cheryl White <cheriewhitee@att.net> Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2021 8:52 AM To: LantzLorraine <Lorraine.Lantz@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: Livingston overpass EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. I had written to you before this to state my objections to this newest affront to the people who live around that Immokalee and Livingston intersection. My husband and I have come up with a couple more ideas. The problems really are at a peak from approximately 7 to 9 in the am and 3:30 to 6 in the pm. Even with the overpass you still have the mess around 75. There are 2 areas where a road could be cut through from 75 to Livingston. One abuts the southern side of the North Regional Park and the other is a road already in place ... the back entrance to the Strand. Both of these would take the pressure off the Immokalee interchange and save millions of dollars. The big issue is all this crazy building out on Immokalee Road. Beautiful Naples is becoming smaller Miami! Cherie White Carlton Lakes Sent from my iPhone Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. From: LantzLorraine To: Kirby. Felicia Subject: [EXTERNAL] FW: Immokolee Road Corridor Construction Project Date: Monday, April 12, 2021 8:53:44 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. FYI Lorraine M. Lantz, AICP Principal Planner Collier County Capital Projects, Planning, Impact Fees & Program Management NOTE: Email Address Has Changed 2685 S. Horseshoe Drive, Suite #103 Naples, FL 34104 Phone: (239) 252-5779 Lorraine.Lantz@CollierCountyFL.gov -----Original Message ----- From: LantzLorraine Sent: Monday, April 12, 2021 8:53 AM To: 'Kathleen BUTERA' <kathleenbutera@yahoo.com> Subject: RE: Immokolee Road Corridor Construction Project Ms. Butera, Thank you for your careful review of our project and for the comments and questions. While the Immokalee Congestion Study is intended to propose recommendations for the Immokalee Corridor, Collier County and our regional partners Lee County and the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) are also working on recommendations and traffic solutions. Collier County is currently working to alleviate some of the congestion on Immokalee Road by completing the following projects: -Vanderbilt Beach Road Extension (VBR Ext.). The VBR Ext. construction project is to create a new east/west facility from the existing VBR approximately 7 miles east (Collier Blvd. to 16th St. NE.). This project is in the final stage of design and construction is scheduled to begin in fiscal year 2022. -VBR Ext. from 16th St. NE to Everglades Blvd. The continuation of the project listed above, will be moving into the design phase in fiscal year 2022. -VBR from East of US 41 to East of Goodlette-Frank Road. This road widening project will expand VBR from four to six lanes and extend approximately 1.8 miles from just east of US 41 to approximately the intersection of Vanderbilt Beach Road and Fontana Del Sol Way. The final design plans are expected to be completed late in 2021 and construction is slated to begin in 2022. •A study of the congestion on Pine Ridge Road from Livingston Rd. to Napa Blvd. was completed and approved in 2018. The recommended project at the intersection of Pine Ridge Rd. and Livingston Rd. was a Continuous Flow Intersection (CFI) which is scheduled for design in this fiscal year and construction beginning in fiscal year 2023. -The Veterans Memorial Blvd. projects are broken up into phases. Phase I is to extend Veterans to the new high school, west of the existing elementary school. This 2-lane facility is expected to be complete in summer 2023. Phase II will extend the roadway to Old 41 Road. Design of that phase is expected to begin in late 2021 and construction may start in spring of 2023. Once Phase II is constructed it will be a parallel segment to Immokalee Road which will assist travelers with an alternate route. In addition, FDOT is currently working to evaluate the future needs of the interstate (I-75). The portion of the project that relates to Lee and Collier Counties is called the Southwest Connect I-75 South Corridor. The status and schedule of the FDOT study can be found at this link: httl2s://urldefense.com/v3/_htips://www.swflinterstates.com/i75-south- corridor/_: ! ! B5cixuoO7ltTeg! Rz6ItJwLwAWmZPIVCGejv_volg4Na8pY1JV 871yA6gXf36vAogrer8AdVvj Kg7wTMH211 OS FDOT's Planning and Feasibility study will evaluate strategies to improve both the mainline of I-75 (by adding lanes) as well as the interchanges and is intended to identify and include potential modifications and requests for new interchanges. I encourage you to participate in that study as well. I hope that this email provides you with the requested information. We will take your comments into consideration and will incorporate them into the final planning study documentation and the project record. Respectfully, Lorraine Lorraine M. Lantz, AICP Principal Planner Collier County Capital Projects, Planning, Impact Fees & Program Management NOTE: Email Address Has Changed 2685 S. Horseshoe Drive, Suite #103 Naples, FL 34104 Phone: (239) 252-5779 Lon•aine.Lantz@CollierCountyFL.gov -----Original Message ----- From: Kathleen BUTERA <kathleenbutera@yahoo.com> Sent: Sunday, April 11, 2021 11:21 AM To: LantzLorraine <Lorraine.Lantz@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: Immokolee Road Corridor Construction Project EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Ms. Lantz, I have reviewed the proposed changes to improve Immokolee Road traffic congestion. It is clear a lot of thought and time has gone into the project. I do not believe the overpass at Livingston is going to solve the problem. This morning I was running early and already there was a considerable amount of traffic on Immokolee; there was very little traffic on Livingston. Livingston has become an alternative to I75 for the following reasons: -Excessive rush hour traffic on I75 resulting in congestion -No exit route from Bonita Beach Road until Corkscrew and area that consistently has traffic accidents Possible solutions I see are: -Free on/off ramps at Vanderbilt and the new Veteran's Parkway -Widening of i75. Thanks, Kathleen Butera Sent from my iPad Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. From: Lantz Lorraine To: Kirby, Felicia Subject: [EXTERNAL] FW: Immokalee/Logan improvements Date: Tuesday, April 13, 2021 4:42:24 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Lorraine M. Lantz, AICP Principal Planner Collier County Capital Projects, Planning, Impact Fees & Program Management NOTE: Email Address Has Changed 2685 S. Horseshoe Drive, Suite #103 Naples, FL 34104 Phone: (239) 252-5779 Lorraine.Lantz@CollierCountyFL.gov -----Original Message ----- From: Sharen Lamb <klambs@comcast.net> Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2021 4:36 PM To: LantzLorraine <Lorraine.Lantz@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: Re: Immokalee/Logan improvements EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Thank you for your very thorough response. Sharen Lamb Sent from my iPhone > On Apr 13, 2021, at 4:07 PM, LantzLorraine <Lorraine.Lantz@colliercountyfl.gov> wrote: > EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. > Ms. Lamb, > Thank you for your comments. If you have not done so already, please review our Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study - Immokalee Road from Livingston Road to Logan Boulevard. The study includes evaluating intersection concepts along the corridor to enhance traffic operations and safety concerns based on current and future travel demands. The following link is to a video presentation explaining the recommendations: https://urldefense.com/v3/_htU2s://collier.granicus. com/player/clip/30049 view_id=4&rcdirect=true_; !!B5cixuoO7ltTeg!UrP7RHZLx97jgs2DfVWdB9p_W_LSJLeyCMBjO2KMs93CRV1- Znk5 RcHuKZ 8 zMoOTXLbZJw$ > In regards to your questions: > 1. There are no current plans to widen Logan Blvd. from a 2 lane facility to a 4 lane facility north of Immokalee Rd. to the Lee/Collier County line. > 2. The Long Range Transportation Plan is to extend Collier Blvd. as a new 2-lane facility north and then west to connect to Logan Blvd. and then continue north (as the existing Logan Blvd.) to Bonita Beach Road. This is recognized as a need in both the Collier and Lee County MPO Plans, but is not funded. > 3. Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) maintains the interstate. FDOT is currently working on a study of the future needs of I-75 called the Southwest Connect I-75 South Corridor. The status and schedule of the FDOT study can be found at this link: htips://urldefense.com/v3/_https://www.swflinterstates.com/i75-south- corridor/_W_LSJLeyCMBj 02KMs93CRV1- Znk5ReHuKZ8zMoPkRWBFRO$ FDOT's Planning and Feasibility study will evaluate strategies to improve both the mainline of I-75 as well as the interchanges and is intended to identify and include potential modifications and requests for new interchanges. I encourage you to participate in that study. > We will add your comments to the Immokalee Road Congestion Study documentation and project record. > Respectfully, > Lorraine > Lorraine M. Lantz, AICP > Principal Planner > Collier County Capital Projects, Planning, Impact Fees & Program Management > NOTE: Email Address Has Changed > 2685 S. Horseshoe Drive, Suite #103 > Naples, FL 34104 > Phone: (239) 252-5779 > Lorraine.Lantz@CollierCountyFL.gov > -----Original Message----- • From: Sharen Lamb <klambs@comcast.net> > Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2021 10:41 AM > To: LantzLorraine <Lorraine.Lantz@colliercountyfl.gov> > Subject: Immokalee/Logan improvements > EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. > Lorraine —I live in the Longshore Lake community which is right off of Immokalee Rd so all of this discussion interests me very much. I have some thoughts and question. 1) The extension of Logan as just a two lane road was a waste of time. It should have been 2 lanes both ways from the get go. Are there any plans to do that. 2) are there any plans to extend Collier Blvd to connect somehow to I75? Doing that, especially with all the developments going in east of Collier would alleviate much of the traffic on Immokalee. 3) It seems that the time has perhaps come to add entrances and exits to I75 from Vanderbilt Beach Rd. Drivers traveling north on Airport -Pulling, Livingston and Oakes eventually end up on Immokalee adding to the congestion. > The solutions to the Immokalee issue are not going to be easy ones but it seems imperative that the solutions be real, long term solutions and not just money wasting bandaids. Thank you for your time. > Sharen Lamb > 4415 Bittern Ct > 860-558-7970 > Sent from my Wad > Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. From: LantzLorraine To: Kirby, Felicia Subject: [EXTERNAL] FW: TP 8353 / Feedback for Collier County, FL (Marsha L Moore ) Date: Wednesday, April 14, 2021 9:19:45 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. FYI Lorraine M. Lantz, AICP Principal Planner o Yer 0ounty Collier County Capital Projects, Planning, Impact Fees & Program Management NOTE: Email Address Has Changed 2685 S. Horseshoe Drive, Suite #103 Naples, FL 34104 Phone: (239) 252-5779 Lorraine. Lantz@CollierCountyFL. From: ScavoneMichelle <Michelle.Scavone@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 20219:16 AM To: moorefuninthesun@gmail.com Cc: DanielleBatesVEN <Danielle.Bates@colliercountyfl.gov>; ScottTrinity <Trinity.Scott@colliercountyfl.gov>; LantzLorraine <Lorraine.Lantz@colliercountyfl.gov>; PizarroMaria <Maria.Pizarro@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: TP 8353 / Feedback for Collier County, FL (Marsha L Moore ) Ms. Moore, Thank you, for your comments. Although you did not specify which 2 intersections you are suggesting, Principal Planner Lorraine Lantz has provided the following information: Transportation Planning is currently conducting the Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study - Immokalee Road from Livingston Road to Logan Boulevard. The study includes evaluating intersection concepts along the corridor to enhance traffic operations and safety concerns based on current and future travel demands. The following link is to a video presentation explaining the recommendations: httos://collier.eranicus.com/alaver/clio/3004?view id=4&redirect=true The recommendations for that study includes converting the intersection of Immokalee Road and Livingston Road to a Single Point Urban Interchange (SPUI) —this is commonly known as an Overpass. The recommendation is that Immokalee Road remain at grade and bridge Livingston Road over Immokalee Road. This is similar to the intersection of Golden Gate Parkway and Airport Road, where Golden Gate Parkway goes over Airport Road. The study also recommends converting the intersection of Immokalee Road and Logan Boulevard to a Partial Displaced Left Turn (PDLT) also known as a Continuous Flow Intersection (CFI) along Immokalee Road. This improvement will increase signal efficiency by allowing for longer green times at each leg of the intersection. The Board of County Commissioners is expected to review and approve the study and these recommendations in the late spring. If these recommendations move forward, the County will work towards funding them in their capital improvement budget. For the two major intersection improvements mentioned above, based on the transportation needs and anticipated funds - the long range plan is as follows: Immokalee Road at Livingston Road- The construction is planned between the years 2026-2030 Immokalee Road and Logan Boulevard - The preliminary engineering is planned between the years 2031-2035 and the construction phase is planned between the years2036-2045 Please let Mrs. Lantz know if you have any additional questions (I have copied her on this email). On behalf of Lorraine Lantz, Principal Planner Michelle Scavone, Operations Coordinator From: ScavoneMichelle Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2021 3:45 PM To: 'moorefuninthesun@gmail.com'<moorefuninthesunPgmail.com> Cc: DanielleBatesVEN <Danielle.Batesl@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: TP 8353 / Feedback for Collier County, FL (Marsha L Moore ) Importance: High We are in receipt of your inquiry. It has been forwarded to the appropriate staff for a response by close of business day on 4/20/2021 or sooner if possible. Sincerely, Michelle Scavone Operations Coordinator & GMD 311 Administrator Community and Media Relations Growth Management Department Michelle.ScavoneCc-)colliercountyfl.gov From: webmaster(@colliercountyfl.gov<webmaster(@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Saturday, April 3, 2021 5:03 PM To: Webmaster<Webmaster(@colliercount)lfl.gov> Subject: Feedback for Collier County, FL EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. You have received this feedback from Marsha L Moore < moorefuninthesun(@gmail.com > for the following page: https://www.colliercountyfl.gov/your-government/divisions-s-z/transportation-planning/planning- studies Why can't you add 2 Overpasses like you have at Golden Gate and Airport Pulling, by 1-75? Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. suM«e oIr-lr[nruclrw:pal Immdaiee Rasrnrntlpr rnnyezlon stunt wetlnestlay, l4, 20213:S6:13 Pm EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a tmsted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links FYI Lorraine M. Lantz, AICP Principal Planer 0 ier_Cot4.nty COIXer County CopXcl Prolech, Planning, Impact P LLLlBk43]�1iz�tit'; From: LantzLorralne Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 20213:56 PM To: 'danmi@abilityteam.com'<denn[s@abilityteam.con Subject: RE: Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study Mr. Lively, Thank you for your comments. They will be added to the public record and the project documentation Respectfully, Lorraine Lorraine M. Lantz, AICP Principal Planner Cofner_county COIXev Count' CapXal Prolech, Planning, Impact F 1TffiEF3iraczsric; From: tlenn's(dab'I'ty[ea m <denn'srdab'I tyteam corn Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 20213:51 PM To: LantzLorraine <Lnrraine.Lanizrdcnllie intyLgnv Subject: RE: Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links Thank you Lorrainel Very informative and easy to understand. Great job] I've traversed the DDI at Sarasota. Different) Sarasota is also installing traffic circles at some of their busiest intersections, such as FruiNille Rd and US 41 BE SAFE! Thanks' Dennis Lively, President Ability Management, Inc. 6736 Lone Oak Blvd Naples, FL 34109-6834 Phone: 239-591-4200 Fax: 239-596-1919 Web: www Ab'I'tyTani corn email: Dend=raAhrmream eo AB11[TY From: Lant . _ r_I antzlalrollierrnnntvfl eov> Sent: Wednesday, Aprlil 14, 20213:37 PM Subject: Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a traded sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Good Afternoon, We are contacting you because of your potential interest Collier County's Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study. Intersections Studied Nine intersections are being studied along the corridor (labeled "A" through "I'). Please reference the project aerial with highlighted squares for the location of each intersection. The following summarizes the recommended solution for each intersection. • A: Livingston Rd. — Convert to a Single Point Urban Interchange (SPUI) commonly known as an Overpass. The recommendation is to bridge Livingston Road over Immokalee Road. The bridge is proposed as 4 lanes (2 lanes in each direction). An additional southbound left turn at Livingston Road is also proposed. Through traffic along Livingston Road would not be required to stop, improving the traffic operations at this intersection. This is similar to the intersection at Golden Gate Parkway and Airport Road, where Golden Gate Parkway goes over Airport Road. e: Juliet Blvd./Strand Blvtl. — Widen the bridge along the southbound side of intersection, add turn lanes and increase the length of the left turn lanes. . C and D, 1-75 lntereharmefSouthbound and Northbound On/Off Ramps 675) — Convert to a Diverging Diamond Interchange (DDI). For this recommendation traffic patterns will only change along Immokalee Road; there will be no change to the traffic pattern on 1-75. Traffic on Immokalee Road will shift (or diverge) to the opposite side of the road as it passes under 1-75 and will be controlled by a traffic signal. A DDI configuration is unusual in that it requires traffic to briefly drive on the opposite side of the road (in this case while under 1-75). Large overhead signs, barriers and/or pavement markings will be used to direct traffic. DDIs are becoming more popular in Florida, as they are an innovative solution to reduce delay and increase mobility and safety. There is a fully operational DDI at 1-75 and University Parkway in Sarasota. FDOT is currently constructing a DDI at 1-75 and Colonial Boulevard in Fort Myers. • E, Northbrooke Dr./Tarpon Bay Blvd. — Widen the bridge along the southbound side of intersection, add turn lanes and increase the length of the left turn lanes. • F: Oakes Blvd. — Restripe existing lanes to add through/right turn lane and increase the length of the left turn lanes. • G: Valewood Dr. — Restripe existing lanes to add through/right turn lane and dedicated right turn lane. • H: Executive Dr. — Restripe existing lanes to add through/right turn lane. • I: Logan Blvd, — Reconstruct the intersection to include a Partial Displaced Left Turn (PDLT) also known as a Continuous Flow Intersection (CFI) along Immokalee Road. The PDLT reconfigures the roadway by allowing vehicles to cross to the left side of the roadway before the intersection, which allows for multiple traffic movements that are not possible at conventional signalized intersections. This improvement will increase signal efficiency by allowing for longer green times at each leg of the intersection. Some of the recommended intersection solutions above are innovative for this area. To find out more about the intersections or to see the conceptual designs and simulated animations demonstrating how a vehicle moves through the more complicated intersections, please view the following video: Immokalee Congestion Study Video The video is approximately 30 minutes long. If you prefer not to watch the entire video, it is bookmarked so that you can skip to the intersection(s) you are most concerned about. The video is also available on the project website located at: Mtos //www colfercountyfl gov/olann ngstudies (under "Current — Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study"). The study is expected to be completed in the late Spring of 2021. Next Steps The Collier County Board of County Commissioners (BCC) is expected to hear this item at a regularly scheduled BCC meeting in the late Spring of 2021. When a final date is determined it will be placed on the project website located at: httos //www colliercnunttijj,any/Dianninastud'es (under "Current— Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study"). All BCC Meetings are open to the public. They begin at 9:00 AM and are held in the BCC Chambers located on the 3rd Floor of the Collier County Government Center, 3299 Tamiami Trail East, Naples, FL 34112. If these recommendations move forward, the County will work towards funding them in the capital improvement budget. The following projects were identified in the Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) as cost feasible for design and construction in the following time periods: • 1-75/Immokalee Road Interchange between 2026-2030 (in coordination with the Florida Department of Transportation - FDOT) • Livingston Road and Immokalee Road Intersection between 2026-2030 • Immokalee Road and Logan Boulevard Intersection between 2031-4045 These timefremes are subject to change as funding and transportation needs change. Should you have any questions on this project, please contact Lorraine Lantz at Lorraine Lantz®CollierCountyFL aov or at 239-252-5779. Respectfully, Lorraine Lorraine M. Lantz, AICP Principal Planner Collier County c—Cnunty Cap-Psejech, Prpnning, MP —fees L -g—Management NOiE. an. Atltlrev — c—getl e Orlve, Suite M109 Naples, rL 4 1o4 Phone: (2a9)35 Under Florida Law, a -mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your a -mail address released in response to a public records request do not and electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. From: Lantz Lorraine To: ROBERT PARKER JR Cc: Events Subject: [EXTERNAL] RE: Immokalee Rd Corridor Congestion Study Date: Thursday, April 15, 2021 1:39:01 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Mr. Parker, Thank you for your careful review of our project. We will take your comments into consideration and will incorporate them into the final planning study documentation. I have also forwarded your comments to our Traffic Operations Department. If they have any additional information, they will reach out to you. Respectfully, Lorraine Lorraine M. Lantz, AICP Principal Planner Collier County Capital Projects, Planning, Impact Fees & Program Management NOTE: Email Address Has Changed 2685 S. Horseshoe Drive, Suite #103 Naples, FL 34104 Phone: (239) 252-5779 Lorraine.Lantz@CollierCountyFL.gov -----Original Message ----- From: ROBERT PARKER JR <Itcflret@aol.com> Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2021 12:57 PM To: LantzLorraine <Lorraine.Lantz@colliercountyfl.gov> Cc: Events <events@longshorelake.org> Subject: Immokalee Rd Corridor Congestion Study EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. I live in Longshore Lake and drive Valewood every day. There are two critical issues the county plan fails to address. 1. Valewood needs a left turn arrow to proceed east on Immokalee. I have seen many near misses when people fail to yield to straight across traffic. The small sign which says left turn must yield is inadequate. Many times 6-8 cars are waiting on 1 car to turn left. 2. The westbound traffic on Immokalee constantly blocks the intersection and traffic leaving Valewood has no place to go. We need permanent blinking yellow lights and signs similar to the one on eastbound Immokalee. Sincerely, Robert Parker (239)248-9450 Sent from my iPhone Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. From: Lantz Lorraine To: Kirby, Felicia Subject: [EXTERNAL] FW: Overpass Date: Friday, April 9, 2021 3:22:13 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. FYI Lorraine M. Lantz, AICP Principal Planner o Yer 0ounty Collier County Capital Projects, Planning, Impact Fees & Program Management NOTE: Email Address Has Changed 2685 S. Horseshoe Drive, Suite #103 Naples, FL 34104 Phone: (239) 252-5779 Lorraine. Lantz@CollierCountyFL. From: LantzLorraine Sent: Friday, April 9, 2021 2:59 PM To: 'Cheryl White' <cheriewhitee@att.net> Subject: RE: Overpass Ms. White, Thank you for your comments, we will add them to the project documentation and public record. The Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study was performed to analyze and consider alternatives (both conventional and innovative) for Immokalee Rd. Were you able to watch the video presentation linked to the website? Link to video: https://collier.granicus.com/player/clip/3004? view id=4&redirect=true Collier County is currently working to alleviate some of the congestion on Immokalee Road by completing the following projects: • Vanderbilt Beach Road Extension (VBR Ext.). The VBR Ext. construction project is to create a new east/west facility from the existing VBR approximately 7 miles east (Collier Blvd. to 16th St. NE.). This project is in the final stage of design and construction is scheduled to begin in fiscal year 2022. • VBR Ext. from 16th St. NE to Everglades Blvd. The continuation of the project listed above, will be moving into the design phase in fiscal year 2022. • VBR from East of US 41 to East of Goodlette-Frank Road. This road widening project will expand VBR from four to six lanes and extend approximately 1.8 miles from just east of US 41 to approximately the intersection of Vanderbilt Beach Road and Fontana Del Sol Way. The final design plans are expected to be completed late in 2021 and construction is slated to begin in 2022. Please let me know if you have any additional comments or questions. Respectfully, Lorraine Lorraine M. Lantz, AICP Principal Planner Collier County Capital Projects, Planning, Impact Fees & Program Management NOTE: Email Address Has Changed 2685 S. Horseshoe Drive, Suite #103 Naples, FL 34104 Phone: (239) 252-5779 Lorraine. Lantz(cDCollierCountyFL.gov -----Original Message ----- From: Cheryl White <cheriewhitee(@att.net> Sent: Wednesday, April 7, 20219:32 AM To: LantzLorraine <Lorraine.Lantz(@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: Overpass EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. I cannot express strongly enough my total disgust of this plan to build an overpass practically in my front yard. I agree that the traffic has become rediculous and for that I thank all of those planning board members who have said a mighty yes to any new building ... be it commercial or residential further east on Immokalee Road. As long as it doesn't affect me go for it , seems to be their thinking. As it is, all this construction has had a huge impact, not only on Immokalee and Livingston Roads but also the beaches. The beach was your bread and butter, now it's shoulder to shoulder people. Aren't there alternatives? What about building a road south around Golf Club of the Everglades and take some of this burden off of Immokalee Road and share it with Vanderbilt Beach Road? Then STOP the building everywhere! We have been here 30 years and know what has been lost. Naples is no longer that quaint, beautiful town except for the small downtown area and its surroundings. Please listen to the people who live in this area. There has to be another solution. Sincerely, Cheryl E. White Carlton Lakes Sent from my iPhone Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. From: LantzLorraine To: Kirby. Felicia Subject: [EXTERNAL] FW: Please don"t destroy our community Date: Thursday, April 15, 2021 2:43:16 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Lorraine M. Lantz, AICP Principal Planner o Yer 0ounty Collier County Capital Projects, Planning, Impact Fees & Program Management NOTE: Email Address Has Changed 2685 S. Horseshoe Drive, Suite #103 Naples, FL 34104 Phone: (239) 252-5779 Lorraine. Lantz@CollierCountyFL. From: LantzLorraine Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2021 2:42 PM To:'mike dunn' <mdunn85@hotmail.com> Cc: Maureen Dunn <maureendunn5@gmail.com>; Colleen Patrick <colleenpatrickl7@gmail.com>; colzay@hotmail.com; kev dunn <supkdunn@gmail.com>; Dan Dunn <danieldunn@me.com> Subject: RE: Please don't destroy our community Mr. Dunn, We are currently working on scheduling a meeting with Carlton Lakes to discuss the options in the area. Please note that this is the public involvement phase of the corridor study. No final decision has been made. We appreciate your input and will add them to the project documentation and public record. As a reminder, we have placed a narrated video presentation on our project website to assist with understanding the Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study. Link to video: https://collier.granicus.com/player/clip/3004?view_id=4&redirect=true Thank you. Respectfully, Lorraine Lorraine M. Lantz, AICP Principal Planner C;0#1r-r Collier County Capital Projects, Planning, Impact Fees & Program Management NOTE: Email Address Has Changed 2685 S. Horseshoe Drive, Suite #103 Naples, FL 34104 Phone: (239) 252-5779 Lorraine. Lantz@CollierCountyFL.aov From: mike dunn <mdunn85C@hotmail.com> Sent: Thursday, April 15, 20218:48 AM To: LantzLorraine <Lorraine.LantzPcolliercountyfl.gov> Cc: Maureen Dunn <maureendunn5(@gmail.com>; Colleen Patrick <colleenpatrick17(@gmail.com>, colzay(@hotmail.com; kev dunn <supkdunn(@gmail.com>; Dan Dunn <danieldunn(@me.com> Subject: Please don't destroy our community EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Lorraine, Please take the attached letter into consideration before deciding to destroy our peaceful and lovely neighborhood. As one of the closest units to Livingston Rd, the noise, additional traffic and severe loss of value to our community should be taken into account before installing an overpass practically over our heads! Please, please, please come up with a new solution. Sincerely, Michael Dunn 5115 Cobble Creek Court Edgewater at Carlton Lakes Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. Attn: Lorraine Lantz Project Manager Collier County Transportation Planning (239) 252-5779 Lorraine. Lantzgcolliercountyfl. gov Our community is in total disbelief that a project of such magnitude hasn't been openly discussed and/or presented to the public and to all parties that could be impacted by it. It's just incomprehensible how a project with so many ramifications for our county and its residents has been kept under the wraps until the last minute; providing just minimum information and the single option to submit all our comments to the County Transportation Planning Department until April 16th, 2021, without any further indication of a possible dialogue or feedback. This left us with almost no time to inform our communities and their owners, and very little time to prepare a proper response to this proposal. As this study title indicates, this is a proposal designed to address the traffic congestion along the Immokalee Rd. corridor, between Livingston Rd. and Collier Blvd. Unfortunately the proposed overpass on Livingston Rd. at Immokalee Rd., cannot and would not diminish any of the incoming traffic going on Immokalee Rd. coming from Livingston Rd., that number will just get bigger and bigger. On the contrary, by eliminating a critical lane on each side of the bridge and shrinking its width from six to four lanes, it'll actually reduce its maximum capacity by 30%, creating not just a backup at peak hours, but also posing a traffic hazard for those trying to exit Livingston, but could not find a proper gap to change lanes in a timely manner, and to those who couldn't switch to the middle lane soon enough before the outside lane ends. At the same time all traffic coming off Livingston Rd. would have to be redirected around the bridge and further on under the bridge and/or to the right or making a U-turn, creating even more obstacles and backups. The same applies for the traffic coming off Immokalee Rd. into Livingston Rd., including a substantial and disruptive traffic going in and out from Seed to Table plaza and Carlton Lakes Blvd. In addition to that, our community will face increased levels of noise and pollution, and the incurable external obsolescence of staring at a bridge, instead of watching a sunset. As previously admitted by your planners, the real solution in this case would have been an overpass on Immokalee Rd., not on Livingston Rd. Because of the proximity of Immokalee Rd. to the canal and the prohibitive cost of such challenging execution, your planners were constrained to abandon this approach. Despite all the facts and evidence pleading against the rationale of this proposed overpass and against any common sense, this proposal is taking on a life of its own; which raises the question, who is actually the beneficiary of this multimillion dollar project? By all means it's not us, neither the neighboring communities or businesses, nor our daily commuters or our county. Compared with the 38 million dollars Golden Gate Overpass in 2007, this new overpass with a projected budget of 30 to 35 million dollars, which might easily exceed 40 million by 2030, it would become just a money pit. On the other hand, it will take at least 4 years to complete and we can only imagine the havoc it'll create, in a place where traffic has already become a nightmare, and that before any construction even got started. And I didn't include the pollution, the noise, the dust and dirt, and all the suffering our city, our community and our street will have to endure, and last but not least, the plummeting values of our properties. Spending this kind of money on such a controversial project, with so limited benefit, isn't just a wasteful spending, but also represents a major stress on the our county's finite reserves, that would divert critical financial and human resources from more important and stringent projects, with immediate and substantial benefits for our county and its residents. Concentrating most of the commercial developments along arteries like Pine Ridge Rd. and Immokalee Rd., and having access to Hwy 75 only through the same corridors, it's in fact the real cause of all these traffic issues we've started having in the last 5 years and most likely we'll continue to have for years to come. Immokalee Rd. corridor congestion is not an accident, poor planning for decades allowed this to happen. Tens of communities were built without suitable amenities in their proximity, forcing people to drive to the same congestive shopping and commercial areas, in addition, the overwhelming population and insufficient major crossing roads from East to West, all sealed our fate. Before any additional highway interchanges to Hwy 75 will be put in place, either at Vanderbilt Rd. or Orange Blossom Rd., and/or at Veterans Memorial Rd.; interchanges which can divert substantial traffic from Immokalee Rd., Pine Ridge Rd. and Tamiami Rd. / Hwy 41, no other solutions would fix our traffic problems. We need to stop this `overpass bonanza'. Our city reputation as one of the most beautiful places in United States it could be profoundly impacted, if such mega bridges will become our signature landmark. We can be smarter than that and can find more suitable solutions to our traffic problems, therefore preserve the prestige and image of our city and county. Entrusting you with the future development of our city and county, it's not a blank check. Your decisions cannot ignore the voice and needs of your constituents and your communities, also you always should take into account that your mandate is to protect and represent the interests of the people and communities of this county, which decisions shouldn't put any of us at disadvantage, but benefit us all. Considering our rights under The First Amendment to the Constitution, we are kindly asking you to review and suspend any decision regarding this proposed overpass at Livingston Rd. and Immokalee Rd., until a proper public hearing will be conducted and a town hall debate can take place, where questions could be answered, concerns could be addressed and a suitable solution could be found. Thank you for your continuing support and understanding. From: Lantz Lorraine To: Andrea Backes Subject: [EXTERNAL] RE: Petition for Carlton Lakes Date: Thursday, April 15, 2021 2:46:46 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Ms. Backes, We are currently working on scheduling a meeting with Carlton Lakes to discuss the options in the area. Please note that this is the public involvement phase of the corridor study. No final decision has been made. We appreciate your input and will add it to the project documentation and public record. As a reminder, we have placed a narrated video presentation on our project website to assist with understanding the Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study. Link to video: his://urldefense.com/v3/ htU2s:Hcollier.granicus.coM 212yer/clip/3004? view_id=4&redirect=true_ !!B5cixuoO7ltTeg!SL4xgGQ12=mTdy- wJMFMVvT06fXl2RNx 1 F6dHv7zBbcgcMXQUq 1 ZL-48H9IpsSVXcwzj-3A$ Thank you. Respectfully, Lorraine Lorraine M. Lantz, AICP Principal Planner Collier County Capital Projects, Planning, Impact Fees & Program Management NOTE: Email Address Has Changed 2685 S. Horseshoe Drive, Suite #103 Naples, FL 34104 Phone: (239) 252-5779 Lorraine.Lantz@CollierCountyFL.gov -----Original Message ----- From: Andrea Backes <ajb2874@gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2021 12:54 PM To: LantzLorraine <Lorraine.Lantz@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: Petition for Carlton Lakes EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. From: LantzLorraine To: Auaustine Perillo Subject: [EXTERNAL] RE: Edgewater at Carlton Lakes Petition Regarding Overpass at Livingston Road and Immokalee Road Date: Thursday, April 15, 2021 2:45:48 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Mr. Perillo, We are currently working on scheduling a meeting with Carlton Lakes to discuss the options in the area. Please note that this is the public involvement phase of the corridor study. No final decision has been made. We appreciate your input and will add it to the project documentation and public record. As a reminder, we have placed a narrated video presentation on our project website to assist with understanding the Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study. Link to video: httns://urldefense.com/v3/_httl2s:Hcollier.granicus.com/player/clip/3004? view id=4&redirect=true 71IB5cixuoO7ltTegIQ4GrcBHly FTejtjkfzSaZVY5fNc1FF]NnHSYbSrdtBr7j1hN9TpnUtiHMfyWDLGuDr ZAS Thank you. Respectfully, Lorraine Lorraine M. Lantz, AICP Principal Planner Collier County Capital Projects, Planning, Impact Fees & Program Management NOTE: Email Address Has Changed 2685 S. Horseshoe Drive, Suite #103 Naples, FL 34104 Phone: (239) 252-5779 Lorraine.Lantz@CollierCountyFL.gov -----Original Message ----- From: Augustine Perillo <augielizp@gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, April 15, 2021 12:23 PM To: LantzLorraine <Lorraine.Lantz@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: Edgewater at Carlton Lakes Petition Regarding Overpass at Livingston Road and Immokalee Road EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. From: Lantz Lorraine To: Paula Pawlowski Subject: [EXTERNAL] RE: Proposed Livingston Overpass Date: Thursday, April 15, 2021 4:49:18 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Mrs. Pawlowski, We are currently working on scheduling a meeting with Carlton Lakes representatives to discuss the options in the area. We appreciate your comments and will add it to the project documentation and public record. As a reminder, we have placed a narrated video presentation on our project website to assist with understanding the Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study. Link to video: https://collier.granicus.com/player/clip/3004?view_id=4&redirect=true Thank you. Respectfully, Lorraine Lorraine M. Lantz, AICP Principal Planner ;?t4 Collier County Capital Projects, Planning, Impact Fees & Program Management NOTE: Email Address Has Changed 2685 S. Horseshoe Drive, Suite #103 Naples, FL 34104 Phone: (239) 252-5779 Lorraine. Lantz@CollierCountyFL.aov From: Paula Pawlowski <paulapaw@me.com> Sent: Thursday, April 15, 20214:26 PM To: LantzLorraine <Lorraine.Lantz@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: Proposed Livingston Overpass EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. To the Collier County Planning Committee, My husband and I live in the Carlton Lakes Community along Livingston Road. We are definitely opposed to the construction of an Overpass on Livingston Road. Livingston is not the problem, Immokolee Road is the problem! We feel this overpass will create more of a traffic problem than it will help. We see it as a big waste of tax dollars on a bad solution to the Immokolee Road congestion! This will be a big detriment to our Community. We are already dealing with the traffic mess from Seed to Table! We urge you to reconsider this plan and come up with a better solution. Sincerely, Paula and Bob Pawlowski 5360 #202 Andover Drive Sent from my iPad Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. From: LantzLorraine To: Kirby, Felicia Subject: [EXTERNAL] FW: Livingston Road Overpass...... Study Date: Friday, April 16, 2021 8:18:35 AM Attachments: Geddis Letter.odf EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. FYI Lorraine M. Lantz, AICP Principal Planner C;ot-ie.-rC;014V1ty Collier County Capital Projects, Planning, Impact Fees & Program Management NOTE: Email Address Has Changed 2685 S. Horseshoe Drive, Suite #103 Naples, FL 34104 Phone: (239) 252-5779 Lorraine.Lantz@CollierCountyFL.gov From: LantzLorraine Sent: Friday, April 16, 2021 8:12 AM To: 'Greg Geddis' <greggeddis2@gmail.com> Subject: RE: Livingston Road Overpass...... Study Mr. Geddis, We are currently working on scheduling a meeting with Carlton Lakes to discuss the options in the area. Please note that this is the public involvement phase of the corridor study. No final decision has been made. We appreciate your input and will add it to the project documentation and public record. As a reminder, we have placed a narrated video presentation on our project website to assist with understanding the Immoka lee Road Corridor Congestion Study. Link to video: https://collier.granicus.com/player/clip/3004?view_id=4&redirect=true Thank you. Respectfully, Lorraine Lorraine M. Lantz, AICP Principal Planner C;ofie- Collier County Capital Projects, Planning, Impact Fees & Program Management NOTE: Email Address Has Changed 2685 S. Horseshoe Drive, Suite #103 Naples, FL 34104 Phone: (239) 252-5779 Lorraine. Lantz@CollierCountyFL.aov From: Greg Geddis <greggeddis2l@gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, April 15, 20215:57 PM To: LantzLorraine <Lorraine.Lantz(@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: Livingston Road Overpass...... Study EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Please open atttached Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. • •saivz)doid -trio jo son[En Vuiim urntd oql `isuol lou inq isul puE `ampua of anEq Ilim iawis mo puE fo"muawo mo `f4jo mo Ouivajjns agi Ilu puu `gip puE isnp aqi `osiou aqi `uorinllod agl apnlour i,uprp I puV •paljeis ion uana uoilaruisuoo /puE aaojaq lEgi puE `amtingWru e amooaq Apeaalu srq arUEai asagm aaefd E uj `aieaaa 11,1! oonEq agi MtgleUli Xfao uma aM puE ala[dwoo of steak t iseal le ajEi [l!m It `pueg .ragio agi uo •lid.Kauoul E isnr-o uoaaq pinom it `O£OZ Kq uo?T[ita Ob Paaaxo Xllst,a lgiliru gorgm `sjul[op uoitt;Lu S£ of 0£.Io iaRpnq palaafoid e glinn ssEdiano mau srgl `LOOZ ut ssmhano axeo uaplog siut[op uoifipu S£ aqi g}im pojudwoo •flunoo ino jo sjalnuriuoo kjFp mo jou `sossmTsnq jo s;)gmnuiujoo Buuogq,5iau agi sagliau `sn lou sir suEaur IIE �Sg �,ioafojd aEllop uolllriurllnuz srgl�o �ia�Iacraq agi �flmniaE si ogm `uoijsmb aql sasol golgm `.umo sir jo OJTl E uo Wuf4ul sr fEsodoid sjgl `a$ljaS uOUILIIOa due iSuiE E puu ssucUano posodoid sigl jo P(moilEY agl isuroBu Suipuold aauopina pu-u sp-ej aql Ifu alidsaQ -goLoaddu sigi uopumgo of pau uAsuoa aiam slauuEld moK `uoilnaaxa Buigualluga Bans jo isoo aniljgMojd agi puE Imuuo aril of •pg aafE-5Ioujarl jo ,14an xold agi jo asnEaag -P2i uoisfuiniZ uo iou `•p2I aalmlounmq uo ssudaano uE uaaq anEq pinom asm silll ul uotinfos [Eaz aqi `snuugld mo,� Sq poiircupu �IsnoiAwd sV -lasuns u 2urgalem jo peaisur `a2?pijq E lE ilmmis jo oouaasalosgo i-owaixa olqu-mouj aqi puE `uopnjfod puE asjou Jo sfana[ past,azoar aaEJ film Alflmujtuoa ma `lmgl of uOlijPPE Ul PnIS s33IEZ uoitiva puu Ezuld afgEZ of paaS ruo-ij lno puu ui 2uroB a!jjuil amid-rusip puE IEjiuEisgns E fuipnfauj ` pZl uols2uinirl oiur -pg 301-01Ouluil jjo l9muzoo ogjaq agi ioj sorlddE oums oU •sd"mq puE saloEisgo ajouj uana fuiieaza `umi-Ile Aui�lum jo i1451i agi of :ro/puu affpuq agi aapun uo .iaqu% puu anpuq aql punose papa-i!pai aq of anEq p[nom •pg uo}sauinf'I jjo i?uiuioo OUJR4 tIE ouiil aluus aqi lid -spun auul opisino agi atojaq glgnoua uoos ouEl atpP�w agi of goji_ms l,upinoo ogm osogl of puu `jauu m Kfauiq E ur saumf aWuEga of dLV .jadomd E puij lou pinoo inq `uols,3uinl'I iixa of Ou Ajl asoup ioj pjuzuq ogj" E ftsod oslu inq `smog 3[Ead lu dnoIaEq u isnC iou �rltiEa.lo `%Ol �q Aj!ouduo uznuuxuui sir oonpai AlfuniDu ll,ii `s:mml moj of xis luo-g gipim slj 2upfuljgs put, a5pirq agi jo apis qmo uo auEl fEorirja a �iujiuujuula Aq `fUu u:oo aqa uo miNiq pine-ioRWiq la,W isnC Iljm iagaunu lEgi `-p2I uolsl�iuini7 mog �Iunaoo •p-d 3afu3foujurl uo'Juro12 oig3uii iiujuloom agl jo Kuu gsruiunp lou pinom put, louuea `-p2l aale3loujuq it, -pg uois$ujnj-1 uo ssediano pasodoid agi ,�faiuuni-jojafl pnlg zattloD puE •p2I uolsi?ujnirl uaamlaq iopi,raoo -pal aalEmlouzuq agi'Ruofm uoilsa�?uoo a!Umii aqi ssaippe of pouBtsop fusodaid m si sell `saivalpm aflli Kprils soli sV •IEsodozd sup of osuodsaz jadoad E aaudwd of awn alliji AnA puu `snumo iiagl puu soiirunun.uoo ino uuojiy! of ouni ou isouilu gitm sn Tjal srgZ •-3lougpaaj jo onVolutp afgissod u jo uotlualpul xagl -nj Am I-amp!m `IZOZ `, 9I I?jdV Iliun luau vudaQ 2lu!imjd uoiiuirodsusis, Xiunoj agi of sluautmoo ino IIE inugns of uoildo offfuts agi puu uorieujaojal umurmrm isnf fuipjnojd `ainurm ml agi Iiiun sdm& ajll -iapun ida3f uaaq sug siuopisal sii put, 1Siunoo mo .joj suoliEoY Tmi Xumuj os t pim loofojd u moq algisuagaidruoaut isnC s,1I •li Aq paioudujr aq pinoo imgi soi:pod go of put, oggnd agl of paluasa.id ao/puE possnosip Xfuado uaaq l,usEq apnliu�Euz Bons jo loafwd E iEgl jailagsip IElol ur si Xi!unulujoo ino no •II. irmao�arlloa �iuE-l•auie�.lo-I 6LL9-ZSZ (6£Z) �iuruuuld uoGlEliodsuuj L,(iunoD iailloa .jaOEuUFq loaCojd zinerl ouleuo-1 _uli-V Is •'JutpuelsTapun puu uoddns VuTnupuoa Tno,i .zoj nofi iluugl -puno3 aq PInoo uorinlos alqulins u pue passaxppe oq pinoa swxmoa `pauamsue oq pinoa suotlsanb azagm `aoeld olm uuo alugap Iluq umol u puu palanpuoa aq Ipm guuuag atlgnd iadoTd t Itlun `-PZj aalu)IoTuurl pule •pal uolsaUlAt-1 lu ssediano posodotd stgl Outp-t0ai uorsioop riuu puadsns pun marnai of Mk iiffi SU �ilpur�l axe and `uotlnlrlsuoD aql of juauipuatud lsiic[ aql spun sTg2p ino.SurTaptsuo-) •Ilu sn atjaaaq lnq `aleluunpustp lu sn jo ,iuu lnd l,upinogs suotstoap gotgm `fqunoo srgl jo satltunuzutoa pule aldoad aql jo slsaTalul aql luasa.tdoi pun laaloTd of st alppuutu moS lugl lun000e olut a31ul ptnogs s Kumlu noX osle `sarltunuimoa TnoS put sluaultlsuoa Tno,i Jo spaau pine aaton aql aTou t louuea suotsTaap .inoA -3lootlo Auslq e lou silt `fqunoo pup Xlta mo jo luautdolaAap aming oql tppA nofi 5utlsn4uFf Xlunoa puu lilta mo jo o5nai pus ai�tlsaTd aql aATasaTd aTojaTagl `suiolgoad og[aq mo of suotlnlos olqultns woui purl usa pure lsgl uegl .t urws aq auo aA, -AI w Tputl omltats Tmo auTooag ipim soWpuq wawa sans jT `palaudun XtpunojoTd oq p[noa 11 solslS pa;run uT would Injtlneoq lsotu agl jo auo su uotltlndoi cilia ino •,uzueuoq ssudaano, srgl dots oI poau am •smaigo.zd aglu zl ino xff pinom suoilnlos .zagao ou `It, SmIl 1 •p-dirueiu t,L Pue -PH a,3pRI au -Id "P-d aalt' lommi motj agjeal lelluelsgns laanip uea gargns sAurga.talut :•PZI []Ct-toma]N sue.19PA Jr .to/put: '-PA uiossoyg Anexp to -PSI I[rgiaput;n le .iat[lla aaaeld ui lnd aq Illm SL SmH of saNuugaaalu[ it;mg9jq leuollippe Sue a zojag -aluJ Jno paluas Ilu `lsarn of lsLA uzo.g spuo.t ButsSOTa .toNtu luatorjjnsut pup uotlulndod �urur[agnnTano aql `uoptppu ut `suoxe IuiaTauawo puu ilutddogs antlsa,Iuoa OLURS aql of aAUp of aldoad 2uTaToj `faiutixoTd Tmgl ui sailTuauie algeltns lnogltm llinq onm satlrunrutuoo jo suol •uoddeg of srgt pamollu sapuoap ioj liumuuld Tood `luopioae ue lou sT uotls30uoa TopuToa •p2I aaluIOUM4 -amoa of s.zuaA JOJ aeeq of anutlaoa II,am S[a3IR lsota put s.ttaA S lsel aql ui 2utnuq pal mis an,am sanssl agueal asagl [[e 3o asnea lua.z aql laej ut s,;l Isiopraaoa autt;s aql q!Jno.tq; lfluo SL S:+eg of ssaaae tu[neq puu `•p2i aa[u)lOMMI puz •pg Apr quid aiil[ sapal a lluolu sluamdolanap lt;lazamtuoa aqj jo Isom 3unualaa3uoa •sluaptsw slt put, Xlunoo ino Toj sjU3uoq lutlumsgns puu aluipau an gllm `slaofoTd juafful4s puu luzpodun aiotu uuoij saamosw utuinq put lutauuug Iexwo lTanip pinom Ttgl `so"osat altulj s,kVLmoo ino agl uo ssaTls To['uur u sluosaidat os[e lnq `gutpuads Injalsrm u lsnCl,ust `lgauaq palturtl os tllinn 'jo afoTd IeTstaAoTluoo u gobs uo Aauauz jo purl stgl'SuipuodS From: LantzLorraine To: Richard Jacobs Subject: [EXTERNAL] RE: Immokalee Road Congestion Study Date: Sunday, April 18, 2021 3:55:38 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Mr. Jacobs, Thank you for your comments regarding the Immokalee Road Congestion Study. We will add them to the project documentation and public record. Respectfully, Lorraine Lorraine M. Lantz, AICP Principal Planner C;of-i"e-r001414ty Collier County Capital Projects, Planning, Impact Fees & Program Management NOTE: Email Address Has Changed 2685 S. Horseshoe Drive, Suite #103 Naples, FL 34104 Phone: (239) 252-5779 Lorraine.Lantz@CollierCountvFL.gov From: Richard Jacobs <dickjacobs44@gmail.com> Sent: Saturday, April 17, 2021 9:36 AM To: LantzLorraine <Lorraine.Lantz@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: Immokalee Road Congestion Study EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Just watched the study and found the improvements to be very good. I may not be alive to see the improvements,but my children and grandchildren may. I live just North of Logan in Heritage Greens and if you don't think that it is a mess getting out of this community and at times Saturnia Lakes do to the 2 schools come down this way at 1:30 to 6:00 some day. I cannot get out of my community at times. This backup will eventually back up to Logan and mess with the flow going East. This area is only going to get worse as time goes on. Someday do a study on how to fix this driving nightmare. Dick Jacobs 1996 Crestview Way Naples FL 34119 239-398-0416 Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. From: Lantz Lorraine To: Kirby, Felicia Subject: [EXTERNAL] FW: Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study Date: Wednesday, April 21, 2021 3:39:02 PM Attachments: imaae002.)na EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. FYI Lorraine M. Lantz, AICP Principal Planner C;ot-ie.-rC;014V1ty Collier County Capital Projects, Planning, Impact Fees & Program Management NOTE: Email Address Has Changed 2685 S. Horseshoe Drive, Suite #103 Naples, FL 34104 Phone: (239) 252-5779 Lorraine.Lantz@CollierCountyFL.gov From: LantzLorraine Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2021 3:38 PM To:'Douglas Wilson' <doug34120@gmail.com> Subject: RE: Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study Mr. Wilson, We are currently still working on the draft report. The tables shown below summarize the analysis of the top alternatives evaluated for the Livingston Road and Immokalee Road intersection. The tables show the recommended improvement, an overpass running North -South, highlighted in green and the alternative, an overpass running East-West, indicated with a red arrow. The Volume -to - Capacity (V/C) ratio represents the hourly volume on the roadway to the capacity it can handle. A V/C ratio <1 is the goal to provide an acceptable LOS. The difference in V/C ratio between the two alternatives indicate a large difference in the projected intersection delay (or time a vehicle is waiting at the signal). These tables and a more detailed explanation of the analysis are also included in the narrated video presentation posed on our project website to assist with understanding the Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study. Link to video: https://colIier.granicus.com/player/clip/3004? view id=4&redirect=true Diverging tiarnond Interchange H S 1.02 1 13 Single Perini NS 1 A a 2 2A Displaced Left Turn 1,52 3 2.4 Displaced Lett Turn {Interchange} �-L4 t Partial Displaced Leff Turn N-S 1-0 1,74 4 2.4 2,4 Partial 0IsplacedLefi Trutt E-W 1.74 5 2.4 Diverging Diamond Interchange E-W 1.81 7 3,3 Single Poini E-W 1.91 7 2.4 Displaced Left Turn (Interchange) 04 1.N 5 10 2.4 TFaftle SI{Inal 2.21 2A single Point N'S 1 07 i 1.4 13iwargingbiamond Interchange N-S 1.19 . 9.3 Displaced Leif Turn 1,33 7,b IF Dispiaeetf Laft Turn (Inter0hElngo) E-VV 1.39 4 2,h Iliverging Wamond Interchange E-W 1.40 S 1-3 Single Point E-W 1.40 5 P2irtigl Displaced Lett Turn N-S 1.0 F7 7 Partial CIspiaced Left Turn F—W 1.51 1 a M24 Displaced Left Turn JInterchangej H-S 1.79 9 Traffle Signal 1,86 1d Please let me know if you have any additional comments or questions. Respectfully, Lorraine Lorraine M. Lantz, AICP Principal Planner Ca per C0-14nty Collier County Capital Projects, Planning, Impact Fees & Program Management OM NOTE: Email Address Has Changed 2685 S. Horseshoe Drive, Suite #103 Naples, FL 34104 Phone: (239) 252-5779 Lorraine.Lantz@CollierCountyFL.gov From: Douglas Wilson <doug34120(@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2021 2:06 PM To: LantzLorraine <Lorraine.Lantz(@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: RE: Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Thanks! I would love to see that section of the study. I mean, handling the traffic N-S would indeed be better if there was less N-S traffic, which I'm guessing might not produce the most improvement overall. I would like to see what the numbers were for the E-W flow on Immokalee Road in each configuration of the overpass, before and after its construction. Is that data available? Doug Wilson 616 Sanctuary Road Naples, FL 34120 (941) 281-3454 From: LantzLorraine <Lorraine. Lantz(@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2021 1:04 PM To: Douglas Wilson <doug34120(@gmail.com> Subject: RE: Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Mr. Wilson, Thank you for your comments, they will become part of the project documentation and public record. In regards to your question, the overpass at the Immokalee/Livingston intersection was evaluated both to run East-West over Livingston Road and North -South over Immokalee Road. The recommended improvement, the overpass running North -South over Immokalee Road, handled the volume of traffic better and provided significantly less intersection delay. Please let me know if you have any additional comments or questions. Respectfully, Lorraine Lorraine M. Lantz, AICP Principal Planner per G0141.ty Collier County Capital Projects, Planning, Impact Fees & Program Management NOTE: Email Address Has Changed 2685 S. Horseshoe Drive, Suite #103 Naples, FL 34104 Phone: (239) 252-5779 Lorraine. Lantz@CollierCountyFL.aov From: Douglas Wilson <doug34120(@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2021 10:17 AM To: Lantz Lorraine <Lorraine.Lantz(@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Ms. Lantz, I watched the video on the above study, which was very well done. I have a question. At Livingston, they want to build an overpass North -South over Immokalee, instead of East-West over Livingston. I thought an E-W overpass would seem the logical way to do it because traffic is greater along Immokalee Rd. (isn't it?). Is there a traffic forecast which justifies placing the overpass N-S? Thanks, Douglas L. Wilson 616 Sanctuary Road Naples, FL 34120 (239) 348-9191 Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. From: LantzLorraine To: Kirby, Felicia Subject: [EXTERNAL] FW: Immokalee road Date: Wednesday, April 21, 2021 1:17:46 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. FYI Lorraine M. Lantz, AICP Principal Planner Collier County Capital Projects, Planning, Impact Fees & Program Management NOTE: Email Address Has Changed 2685 S. Horseshoe Drive, Suite #103 Naples, FL 34104 Phone: (239) 252-5779 Lorraine. Lantz@CollierCountyFL. From: LantzLorraine Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2021 1:16 PM To: 'sbagz' <sbagz@aol.com> Subject: RE: Immokalee road Mr. Bagniuk In response to your questions, Collier County is currently working to alleviate some of the congestion on both Immokalee Road and Pine Ridge Road by completing the following parallel reliever projects: • Vanderbilt Beach Road Extension (VBR Ext.). The VBR Ext. construction project is to create a new east/west facility from the existing VBR approximately 7 miles east (Collier Blvd. to 16th St. NE.). This project is in the final stage of design and construction is scheduled to begin in fiscal year 2022. • VBR Ext. from 16th St. NE to Everglades Blvd. The continuation of the project listed above, will be moving into the design phase in fiscal year 2022. • VBR from East of US 41 to East of Goodlette-Frank Road. This road widening project will expand VBR from four to six lanes and extend approximately 1.8 miles from just east of US 41 to approximately the intersection of Vanderbilt Beach Road and Fontana Del Sol Way. The final design plans are expected to be completed late in 2021 and construction is slated to begin in 2022. • A study of the congestion on Pine Ridge Road from Livingston Rd. to Napa Blvd. was completed and approved in 2018. The recommended project at the intersection of Pine Ridge Rd. and Livingston Rd. was a Continuous Flow Intersection (CFI) which is scheduled for design in this fiscal year and construction beginning in fiscal year 2023. In addition, FDOT is currently working to evaluate the future needs of the interstate. The portion of the project that relates to Lee and Collier Counties is called the Southwest Connect 1-75 South Corridor. The status and schedule of the FDOT study can be found at this link: https://www.swflinterstates.com/i75-south-corridor/ FDOT's Planning and Feasibility study will evaluate strategies to improve both the mainline of 1-75 as well as the interchanges and is intended to identify and include potential modifications and requests for new interchanges. I encourage you to participate in that study as well. For long range planning the County looks to the Collier MPO. The current Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) was adopted in December 2020 and plans for projects through the year 2045. Some roads are identified in the LRTP needs plan, indicating that if funding were not an obstacle, those roads would be constructed or improved for the entire road network and infrastructure to be optimized; however, funding is always a consideration. The 2045 LRTP prioritizes the transportation needs of the county and allocates anticipated funds to projects. The projects that are determined to be cost feasible are then the projects that the agencies (jurisdictions/municipalities) work towards funding in their capital improvement budgets Only those projects that have anticipated funding through 2045 are included in the 2045 LRTP Cost Feasible Plan, therefore if a certain road project is not on the plan — it is not funded in the County's budget and is not listed in the County's work program. Collier Blvd. extension to the Lee County Line is one of those projects, listed on the LRTP Needs plan but not in the Cost Feasible Plan. The plan for Collier Blvd. Ext. is to build a new 2-lane facility which carries vehicles north and then west to connect to Logan Blvd. and then continue north (as the existing Logan Blvd.) to Bonita Beach Road. The Lee County MPO has listed this project (from the county line north to Corkscrew Road) on their needs plan, not cost feasible plan. This project has been discussed and included as a need in both MPO's respective LRTP's for many years, but as you mentioned it has environmental concerns that will likely create lengthy and costly challenges, if this project moves forward. I hope that this email provides you with the requested information. Thank you for your careful review of our project and for the comments and questions. We will take your comments into consideration and will incorporate them into the final planning study documentation. Respectfully, Lorraine Lorraine M. Lantz, AICP Principal Planner C;o*-ie,-rC;0-1414tY Collier County Capital Projects, Planning, Impact Fees & Program Management NOTE: Email Address Has Changed 2685 S. Horseshoe Drive, Suite #103 Naples, FL 34104 Phone: (239) 252-5779 Lorraine, Lantz@CollierCountyFL.aov From: sbagz <sbagz(@aol.com> Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2021 11:25 AM To: LantzLorraine <Lorraine.Lantz(@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: Immokalee road EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Ms. Lantz I am a resident of Longshore Lake which has been negatively affected by the increased traffic volume on Immokalee Road. Our association has shared the proposed improvements along the corridor. All wonderful ideas which we will have to suffer through while the improvements are made. Meanwhile as more development continues to our east, the county needs to extend 951 northward to accomodate that growth. I understand that there are environmental concerns but if they can unite the florida keys with elevated bridges and roadways, they can do it with 951. 1 am frustrated that the county continues to allow huge developments east of 951 and yet has not planned to accomodate the added traffic. I believe in addition to the proposed improvements, efforts to reduce the traffic on Immokalee road need to be investigated. Building northbound 951 as there are no northbound routes other than Logan and 175 is something that needs to be seriously considered. Adding ramps at Vanderbuilt beach road might also help as there is no interstate access between Immokalee and Pine Ridge roads. The need is there and the county needs to respond to this issue. I would appreciate a response to this email. Thankyou Steve Bagniuk Sbagz(@aol.com Sent from my T-Mobile 5G Device Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. Fram: Lantzlixraine To: KIrM. Fellna subject: [EXTERNAL] FW: Proposed 1-wing— U. Overyass a1—kale, Rd. Dare: Monday, May 3, 20212:23:28 PM A U,achmerrts: Imaae0ol.mw EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Lorraine M. Lantz, AICP Principal Planner cill C01414ty Collier Co-ty Capital Projects. Planning. Impact Fees 4 Program Management NOTE: Email Address Has Chongetl 26M S. Horseshoe Drive, Suite N103 Naples, FL 34104 Phone: (239)252.5779 From: LantzLorraine Sent: Monday, May 3, 20212:22 PM To: 'Marius Stoia' <askmahus@gmail.com> Subject: RE: Proposed Livingston Rd. Overpass at Immokalee Rd. Mr. Stela, I apologize for not replying to your message sooner. It was removed from my in -bin by our IT department for security reasons and then forwarded to my Junk Mail. After speaking with you this morning, I checked my Junk Mail and contacted IT Security to release the email. As previously discussed, we met on Friday with representatives from Carlton Lakes to discuss the options in the area. We are also planning to host a virtual type meeting for this corridor study in the future. Please note that this is the public involvement phase of the corridor study. No final decision has been made. We appreciate your input and will add them to the project documentation and public record. Thank you. Respectfully, Lorraine Re: Proposed Livingston Rd. Overpass at Immokalee Rd. Marius Stoia <asl manw9cimailcum, F j Reply `<j Reply All Forward E To •L,Rt Lco,r,e Thu4J15/202111,41PM (] linksanauther funeti—rpty nave been disabled ih thls mesrage. To Sum on WrindoW10, onvethis messagetatbe Inha The gatl-1,lunk Fm 1 filter marked this message as spa we co—ft dths mess aue Into plain textfurmat EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments orcliclurg links. Attn: Lorraine Lantz Project Manager Collier County Transportation Planning (239j252-5779 LArraine.Lantzpmli lermuntyd.gov nmalltotLorraine.Lantt@ml liercouffW.goy: Our community is in total disbelief that a project of such magnitude hasn't been openly discussed and/or presented to the public and to all parties that could be impacted by it. It's just incomprehensible how a project with so many ram Ifcations for our county and its residents has been kept under the wraps until the last minute; prcvicFngjust minimum information and the single option to submit all our comments to the County Transportation Planning Department until April loth, 2021, without any further indication of a possible dialogueor feedback. This left us with almost no time to "inform our communities and their owners, and very lit -He time to prepare a proper response to this proposal. As this study title indicates, this is a proposal designed to address the traffic congestion along the Immakalee Rd. corridor, between Livingston Rd. and Collier Blvd. Unfortunately theproposed overpass on Livingston Rd. at immckalee Rd., cannot and would not diminish any of the incoming traffic going on ImmokaIce Rd. coming from Livingston Rd., that number will just get bigger and bigger. On the contrary, by eliminating a critical lane on each side aft he bridge and shrinking its width from six to four lanes, it'll actually reduce its maximum capacityby30%, creating not just a backup at peak hours, but also posinga traffic hazard for those trying to exit Livingston, but could not find a proper gap to change lanes in a timely manner, and to those who couldn't switch to the middle lane soon enough before the outside lane ends. At the same time all traffic coming off Limngston Rd. would have to be redirected around the bridge and further on under the bridge and/or to the right or making a U-turry.creating even more obstacles and backups. The sameappl ies for the traffic mining off Immokal ee Rd. into LivingstonRd., including a substantial and disruptive traffic going in and out from Seed to Table plaza aid Carlton Lakes Blvd. In addition to that, our community will face increased levels ofnoise and pollution, and the incurable external obsolescence of staring at a bridge, Instead of watching a sunset. As previously admitted by your planners, the real sal ution In this case would bare been an overpass on Immokalee Rd., not on Livingston Rd. Because of the proximdy of Immakalee Rd, to the canal and the prohibitive cost of such challenging execution, your pianners were constrained to abandon this approach. Despite all the facts and evidence pleading against the ratlooale ofthis proposed overpass and against any common sense, this proposal is taki rig on a life of its awn; which raises the question, who is actually the henefl dory of this muhimihion dollar project? By all means it's not us, neither the nelghbodngrnmmunihes or businesses, nor our daily commuters or our county. 411 folders are up to pate, Connected lo= Minosoft Exchange LW D1splay5ettings n m 1 Lorraine M. Lantz, AICP Principal Planner Co yer county Collier County Capital Projects. Planning. Impact Fees 8 Program Management NOTE: Email Address Has Changed 2485 S. Horseshoe DrNe, Suffe #103 Naples, FL 34104 Phone: t211) 252�5yy9 L.noin. Lcir, Q. 'ollierr'n rift anv From: Marius Stoia <askmarinsraemaiLcom> Sent: Thursday, April 15, 202111:44 PM To: LantzLorraine <Lorraine.Lantzc@colliercountvfl.gov- Subject: Re: Proposed Livingston Rd. Overpass at Immokalee Rd. EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Attn: Lorraine Lantz Project Manager Collier County Transportation Planning (239) 252-5779 T orraine.i.antz(Wcoljiercountyfl.gnv Our community is in total disbelief that a project of such magnitude hasn't been openly discussed and/or presented to the public and to all parties that could be impacted by it. It's just incomprehensible how a project with so many ramifications for our county and its residents has been kept under the wraps until the last minute; providing just minimum information and the single option to submit all our comments to the County Transportation Planning Department until April 16", 2021, without any further indication of a possible dialogue or feedback. This left us with almost no time to inform our communities and their owners, and very little time to prepare a proper response to this proposal. As this study title indicates, this is a proposal designed to address the traffic congestion along the Immokalee Rd. corridor,between Livingston Rd. and Collier Blvd. Unfortunately theproposed overpass on Livingston Rd. at Irnmokalee Rd., cannot and would not diminish any of the incoming traffic going on Immokalee Rd. coming from Livingston Rd., that number will just get bigger and bigger. On the contrary, by eliminating a critical lane on each side of the bridge and shrinking its width from six to four lanes, it'll actually reduce its maximum capacityby 30%, creating not just a backup at peak hours, but also posinga traffic hazard for those trying to exit Livingston, but could not find a proper gap to change lanes in a timely manner, and to those who couldn't switch to the middle lane soon enough before the outside lane ends. At the same time all traffic coming off Livingston Rd. would have to be redirected around the bridge and further on under the bridge and/or to the right or making a U-turn, creating even more obstacles and backups. The sameapplies for the traffic coming off Inamokalee Rd. into LivingstonRd., including a substantial and disruptive traffic going in and out from Seed to Table plaza and Carlton Lakes Blvd. In addition to that, our community will face increased levels ofnoise and pollution, and the incurable external obsolescence of staring at a bridge, instead of watching a sunset. As previously admitted by your planners, the real solution in this case would have been an overpass on Imrnokalee Rd., not on Livingston Rd. Because of the proximity of Immokalee Rd. to the canal and the prohibitive cost of such challenging execution, your planners were constrained to abandon this approach. Despite all the facts and evidence pleading against the rationale of this proposed overpass and against any common sense, this proposal is taking on a life of its own; which raises the question, who is actually the beneficiary of this multimillion dollar project? By all means it's not us, neither the neighboringcommunities or businesses nor our daily commuters or our county. Compared with the 38 million dollars Golden Gate Overpass in 2007, this new overpass with a projected budget of 30 to 35 million dollars, which might easily exceed 40 million by 2030, it would become just a money pit. On the other hand, it will take at least 4 years to complete and we can only imagine the havoc it'll create, in a place where traffic has already become a nightmare, and that before any construction even got started. And I didn't include the pollution, the noise, the dust and dirt,and all the suffering our city, our community and our street will have to endure, and last but not least, the plummeting values of our properties. Spending this kind of money on such a controversial project, with so limited benefit, isn't just a wasteful spending, but also represents a major stress on the our county's finite reserves, thatwould divert critical financial and human resources from more important and stringent projects, with immediate and substantial benefits for our county and its residents. Concentrating most of the commercial developments along arteries like Pine Ridge Rd. and Immokalee Rd., and having access to Hwy 75 only through the same corridors, it's in fact the real cause of all these traffic issues we've started havingin the last 5 years and most likely we'll continue to have for years to come. Immokalee Rd. corridor congestion is not an accident, poor planning for decades allowed this to happen. Tens of communities were built without suitable amenities in their proximity, forcing people to drive to the same congestive shopping and commercial areas, in addition, the overwhelmingpopulation and insufficient major crossing roads from East to West, all sealed our fate. Before any additional highway interchanges to Hwy 75 will be put in place, either at Vanderbilt Rd. or Orange Blossom Rd., and/or at Veterans Memorial Rd.; interchanges which can divert substantial traffic from Immokalee Rd., Pine Ridge Rd. and Tamiami Rd. / Hwy 41, no other solutions would fix our traffic problems. We need to stop this `overpass bonanza'. Our city reputation as one of the most beautiful places in United States it could be profoundly impacted, if such mega bridges will become our signature landmark. We can be smarter than that and can fmdmore suitable solutions to our traffic problems, thereforepreserve the prestige and image of our city and county. Entrusting you with the future development of our city and county, it's not a blank check. Your decisions cannot ignore the voice and needs of your constituents and your communities, alsoyou always should take into account that your mandate is to protect and represent the interests of the people and communities of this county, which decisions shouldn't put any of us at disadvantage, but benefit us all. Considering our rights under The First Amendment to the Constitution, we are kindly asking you to review and suspend any decision regarding this proposed overpass at Livingston Rd.and Immokalee Rd., until a proper public hearing will be conducted and a town hall debate can take place, wherequestions could be answered, concerns could be addressed and a suitable solution could be found. Thank you for your continuing support and understanding. Sincerely, Marius & Alma Stoia 5140 Cobble Creek Ct, Unit 203 Naples, FL 34110 askmarius jamail.com 646-808-5702 Under Florida Law, a -mail addre - are public record.. If y.0 d. nut want your e-mail add,— rele— I. response I. a public...- request, d..of send eI.d..i. mail to this entity. Instead, ..fact this once by telephone., in wnfi.g. F. lantzLomalm To: grhv. FNicia Subject: [EXTERNAL] Fw: Petition Regarding Overpass at Livingston Road and toned ee Road! date: Monday, May 3, 20212:23:12 PM Attachments: maoe0ol.ona EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. FYI Lorraine M. Lantz, AICP Principal Planner Collier Cou-hty Collier County Capital Projects, Planning. Impact fees 4 Program Management NOTE: Email Address Has Changed 2685 S. Horseshoe Drive, Suite 8103 Naples, FL 34104 Phone: (239j252-5711 Lomaine.Lanh.ColLa,,urI,1L. ov From: Lantz Lorraine Sent: Monday, May 3, 20212:04 PM To:'Debbie Adamski' <sheba2329@gmail.com> Subject: RE: Petition Regarding Overpass at Livingston Road and Immokalee Road Ms. Adamski, I apologize for not replying to your message sooner. It was removed from my in -bin by our IT department for security reasons and then forwarded to my Junk Mail. After speaking with Mr. Stela this morning, I checked my Junk Mail and contacted IT Security to release the email. We met on Friday with representatives from Carlton Lakes to discuss the options in the area. We are also planning to host a virtual type meeting for this corridor study in the future. Please note that this is the public involvement phase of the corridor study. No final decision has been made. We appreciate your input and will add them to the project documentation and public record. Thank you. Respectfully, Lorraine Petition Regarding Overpass at Livingston Road and Immokalee Road Onabbie Adamski <sheGa23214®gmaikcom> Reply 'dj Kni0iAR -i Forward To O L-1.1- ours, Thu 41t5, 2d21 not IrM unl:s and xth,rfundlonal{ty have keen d{sahl,d its this message To turn fin Seat tvn rtiona{itg, movatht, rrrts,age tome Inbm, T he O stlook ludic Email tiller markedV is.,,,age ie ,pa. Wa mnvededttd, message into plain tetftereat, EXTERNAL EMAIL -This email is from an external sours -confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments c rclickine links. 7urcommunity is in total disbelief that a project ell magnitude hasn't been openly discussed and/or presented to the public and to all parties that could be impacted by It. It'sjust incomprehensible how a project with so many ramifications for our county and its residents has peen kept under thewnaps until the last minute; provid imgjust minimum information and the singleopUonto submit all our :omments to the County Transportation Planning Department until April 16th, 2021, Without any f sitherindlcation of a possible dialogue or feedback. This left us with almost no time to inform our :ommunities and their owners, and very little time to prepare a proper response to this proposal, 4s1his study title indicates, this is a proposal designed to address the traffic congestion along the Immokalee Rd. corridor, between Livingston Rd. and Collier Blvd. Unfortunately the proposed overpass on uyingsten Rd. at Incrookalee Rd., cannot and would not diminish any of the incoming traffic going on Immokalee Rd. coming from Livingston Rd., that number will just get bigger and bigger, On the contrary, ay eliminating a critical lane on each side ri bridge and shrinking its width from six to fourlanes, it'll actually reduce its maximum capacity by 311%, creating not just a backup at peak hours, but also Dosing a traffic hazard for those trying to exit Livingston, but could not find a proper gap to change lanes in a timely manner, anulto those who couldn't switch to the middle lane soon enough before the outside Are ends. Atthe same time all traffic coming off Livingston Rd. would have to be redirected around the bridge and further on underthe bridge andfortothe right or making a U-turn, creating even more obstades and backups. The same applTesfor thetraffic coming off Immokalee Rd. into Livingston Rd., including a substantial and disruptive traff,going in and out from Seed to Table plan Carlton rakes Blvd. In addition to that our community will face increased levels of noise and pollution, and the incur ie extemal obsolescenre of staring at a bridge, instead of watching a sunset, 4s prern—ly admitted by your planners, the real solution in this case Would have been an overpass on Immokalee Rd., not on Dvingstdn Rd. Because of the proximity of Immokalee Rd. to the canal and the orohlbitive cost of such challenging execution, your planners were constrained to abandon this approach. Despite all the facts and evidence pleading against the rationale of this proposed overpass and against any common sense, this proposal is taking on a life c its own; which raises the question, who is actually the beneficiary of this multimillion dollar project? By all means its not us, neither the neighboring communities or businesses, nor our daily commuters or our county. Compared with the 38 million dollars Golden Gate Overpass in 20D7, this new overpass wifh a projected budget of 30 td B5 million dollars, which might easily exceed 40 million by 2030, it would become just a money ph. On the other hand, it will take at least 4years to complete and we can only imagine the havoc it'll create, in 4 mace where traffic has already become a nightmare, and that before any constructiomeven got started. And I didn't Include the pollution, the noise, the dust and dirt, and all the suffering our city, our :ommunity and our street will have to endure, and last but not least, the plummeting vaiues of our properties, Spending this kind of money on such a controversial pro]ect, with so limited benefd, ian'tjust a wasteful spending, but also represents a major sires on the our county'sfioite reserves, that would divert :ritical financial and human resources from more important and stringent projects, With immediate and substantial benefits for our county and its residents, Eancentrating most of the commercial developments all arteries like Pine Ridge Rd, and Immokalee Rd., and having access to Hwy 75 only through the same corridors, it's in fact the real cause of all these traffic issues we've started having inthe last 5 years and most likely we'll continue to have foryearsto come. Immokalee Rd. corridor congestion is not an accident, poor planning for decades allowed this to happen. Tens of communities were built without suitable amenities in their pmxim5ty, forcing people to drive to the same congestive shopping and commercial areas, in addition, the overwhelming population and insufFdent major crossing roadsfrdm East to West, all sealed our fate. Before any additional highway interchanges to Hwy 75 will be put a pi—, either at Vanderbilt Rd. or Orange Blossom Rd., and/or at Veterans Memorial Rd.; interchanges which can divert substantial traffic from Immokalee Rd., Pine Ridge Rd. and Tamiami Rd. / Hwy 41, no other solutions would fix our traffic problems. We aeed to stop this `overpass bonanza :Our city reputation as one of the most beautiful places in United States it could be p romundly impacted, ifsuch mega bridges will become our signature landmark. We :an be smarter than that and can find more suitable solutions to our traffic problems, therefore preserve the prestige and image of our atyand county. Entrusting you with the future development of cur Aty and county, its not a blank Check, Your decisions cannot ignore the voice and needs of your constituents and your communities, also you always should take into account that your mandate is to protect and representtheinterests of the people and communites ofthis county, which dedsions shouldn't put any of us atdisadvantage, but bari us all. 411falaersareuutedne, Cannert,d to: Minn—ft.Firhanse 4 Di,pluy Setting=- ®. m - e - --_ Lorraine M. Lantz, AICP Principal Planner C;0MY C;014 ty Collier County Capital Projects, Planning. Impact Fees & Program Management NOTE: Email Address Has Changed 2685 S. Horseshoe Drive, Suite N103 Naples, FL 34104 Phone: (239) 252-5779 From: Debbie Adamski <sheba2329l3)gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, April 15, 20215:41 PM To: LantzLorraine <Lorraine. LantzPco iercountvfl.eov> Subject: Petition Regarding Overpass at Livingston Road and Immokalee Road EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Our community is in total disbelief that a project of such magnitude hasn't been openly discussed and/or presented to the public and to all parties that could be impacted by it. It'sjust incomprehensible how a project with so many ramifications for our county and its residents has been kept under the wraps until the last minute; providingjust minimum information and the single option to submit all our comments to the County Transportation Planning Department until April 16th, 2021, without anyfurther indication of a possible dialogue orfeedback. This left us with almost no time to inform our communities and their owners, and very little time to prepare a proper response to this proposal. As this studytitle indicates, this is a proposal designed to address the traffic congestion along the Immokalee Rd. corridor, between Livingston Rd. and Collier Blvd. Unfortunately the proposed overpass on Livingston Rd. at Immokalee Rd., cannot and would not diminish any ofthe incoming traffic going on Immokalee Rd. comingfrom Livingston Rd., that number will just get bigger and bigger. On the contrary, by eliminating a critical lane on each side ofthe bridge and shrinking its width from sixto four lanes, it'll actually reduce its maximum capacity by 30%, creating notjust a backup at peak hours, but also posing a traffic hazard forthose trying to exit Livingston, but could not find a proper gap to change lanes in a timely manner, and to those who couldn't switch to the middle lane soon enough before the outside lane ends. At the same time all traffic coming off Livingston Rd. would have to be redirected around the bridge and further on underthe bridge and/orto the right or making a U-turn, creating even more obstacles and backups. The same applies for the traffic coming off Immokalee Rd. into Livingston Rd., including a substantial and disruptive traffic going in and out from Seed to Table plaza and Carlton Lakes Blvd. In addition to that, our community will face increased levels of noise and pollution, and the incurable external obsolescence of staring at a bridge, instead of watching a sunset. As previously admitted by your planners, the real solution in this case would have been an overpass on Immokalee Rd., not on Livingston Rd. Because ofthe proximity of Immokalee Rd. to the canal and the prohibitive cost of such challenging execution, your planners were constrained to abandon this approach. Despite all the facts and evidence pleading against the rationale of this proposed overpass and against any common sense, this proposal is taking on a life of its own; which raises the question, who is actually the beneficiary of this multimillion dollar project? By all means it's not us, neitherthe neighboring communities or businesses, nor our daily commuters or our county. Compared with the 38 million dollars Golden Gate Overpass in 2007, this new overpass with a projected budget of 30 to 35 million dollars, which might easily exceed 40 million by 2030, it would becomejust a money pit. On the other hand, it will take at least 4 years to complete and we can only imagine the havoc it'll create, in a place where traffic has already become a nightmare, and that before any construction even got started. And I didn't include the pollution, the noise, the dust and dirt, and all the suffering our city, our community and our street will have to endure, and last but not least, the plummeting values of our properties. Spending this kind of money on such a controversial project, with so limited benefit, isn'tjust a wasteful spending, but also represents a major stress on the our county's finite reserves, that would divert critical financial and human resources from more important and stringent projects, with immediate and substantial benefits for our county and its residents. Concentrating most ofthe commercial developments along arteries like Pine Ridge Rd. and Immokalee Rd., and having access to Hwy 75 onlythrough the same corridors, it's in fact the real cause of all these traffic issues we've started having in the last 5 years and most likely we'll continue to have for years to come. Immokalee Rd. corridor congestion is not an accident, poor planning for decades allowed this to happen. Tens of communities were built without suitable amenities in their proximity, forcing people to drive to the same congestive shopping and commercial areas, in addition, the overwhelming population and insufficient major crossing roads from East to West, all sealed our fate. Before any additional highway interchanges to Hwy 75 will be put in place, either at Vanderbilt Rd. or Orange Blossom Rd., and/or at Veterans Memorial Rd.; interchanges which can divert substantial traffic from Immokalee Rd., Pine Ridge Rd. and Tamiami Rd. / Hwy41, no other solutions would fix our traffic problems. We need to stop this 'overpass bonanza'. Our city reputation as one ofthe most beautiful places in United States it could be profoundly impacted, if such mega bridges will become our signature landmark. We can be smarterthan that and can find more suitable solutions to our traffic problems, therefore preserve the prestige and image of our city and county. Entrusting you with the future development of our city and county, it's not a blank check. Your decisions cannot ignore the voice and needs of your constituents and your communities, also you always should take into account that your mandate is to protect and represent the interests ofthe people and communities of this county, which decisions shouldn't put any of us at disadvantage, but benefit us all. Considering our rights under The First Amendment to the Constitution, we are kindly asking you to review and suspend any decision regarding this proposed overpass at Livingston Rd. and Immokalee Rd., until a proper public hearing will be conducted and a town hall debate can take place, where questions could be answered, concerns could be addressed and a suitable solution could be found. Thank you for your continuing support and understanding. Debra Adamski & Joseph Ada mski 5120 Cobble Creek Court, Unit 103 Naples, FL Sent from my iPad Under Florida Law, a -mail addres— are public records. If you do not want your —ail addre. released In response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to tins entity. Instead, contact this ofFlce by telephone or in writing. From: grain, To: steohen Godon Cc: Marius Stnla: Gordon. Susan; Nicholas Mealev Subject: LExrERNALI RE: Livingston overpass Date: Monday, May 3, 2021 1:49:16 PM Attachments: ImaneWL.r. a EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Mr. Gordon, I apologize for not replying to your message sooner. It was removed from my in -bin by our IT department for security reasons and then forwarded to my Junk Mail. After speaking with Mr. Stoia this morning, I checked my Junk Mail and contacted IT Security to release the email. We met on Friday with representatives from Carlton Lakes to discuss the options in the area. We are also planning to host a virtual type meeting for this corridor study in the future. Please note that this is the public involvement phase of the corridor study. No final decision has been made. We appreciate your input and will add them to the project documentation and public record. Thank you. Respectfully, Lorraine Livingston overpass Stephen Gradon 6115orda2rissn.conrl •� Refry Refry AR I 4imaerea u To 0 Lamat.—ame. wiui*14 Air 2.14 FIA Cc Marias5mia; - Gordonr Susan; Nxhdael l.y 1 ii Lin ks and other Wr lonalny have bee n allsabletl In IN message. To tem on to at functlona0ty, movetha men. Ise to the l nhox. The 0di-k iunk EmaIi finer marked this message as ---pant. we removed extra tine Meeks from this message. We converted this message into plain text fu lntat. EXTERNAL EMAIL This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or olickrng links. Attn: Lorraine Lantr Project Manager Collier County Transportation Planning (2391 252-5779 Lvetalhe.Lant2�a1w1iercountyfi.Rov Our community is in total disbelief that a pr jeot of au h magnitude hasn't been openly discussed and/or presented to the public and to all parties that could be impacted by it. Its just incomprehensible how a projectwrth so many ramificationsfor our county and its residents has been kept underthe wraps until the last minute; providing just minimum information and the single option to submit all our comments to the County Transportation Planning Department until April 16th, 2021, without any further indication of a possible dialogue or feedback. This left us with almost no time to inform our communities and their owners, and very little time to prepare a proper response tothis proposal. As this study title indicates, this is a proposal designed to address the traffic congestion alial Immakalee Rd. corridor, between Livingston Rd. and Collier Blvd. Unfortunately the proposed overpass on Livingston Rd. at Immakalee Rd., cannot and would not diminish any of the incoming traffic going on Immokalee Rd. comingfrom Livingston Rd., that number will just get bigger and bigger. On the contrary, by eliminating a critical lane on each side of the bridge and shrinking its width from six to four lanes, it'll actually reduce its maximum capacity by 30%, creating notjust a backup at peak hours, but also posing a Vatfic hazard forth— trying to exit Livingston, but could not find a proper gap to change lanes in a timely manner, and to those who couldn't switch tothe middle lane soon enough before the outside Fan. ends. At the same time all traffic coming off Livingston Rd. would have to be redirected around the bridge andfurther on under the bridge and/arto the right or making a U-turn, creating even more obstacles and backups. The same applies for the traffic coming off Immakalee Rd. into Livingston Rd., including a substantial and disruptive traffic going in and out from Seed to Table plaza and Carlton Lakes Blvd. In addition to that, our community, will face increased levels of noise and pollution, and the incurable external obsolescence of staring at a bridge, instead of watching a sunset. I As previously admitted by your planners, the real solution in this case would have been an overpass on Immakalee Rd., not on Livingston Rd. Because of the proximity of Immakalee Rd, to the canal and the prohibitive cost of such challenging execution, your planners were constrained to abandon this approach. Despite all the facts and evidence pleading against the rationale ofthis proposed overpass and against any common sense, this proposal istaking on a life of its awn; which nal the question, who is actually the beneficiary fthis multimillion dollar project? By all means its not us, neither the neighboring communities or businesses, nor Dun dally commuters or our county. Compared with the 38 million dollars Golden Gate Overpassm 2007, this new overpass with a projected budget of 30 to 35 million dollars, which might easily exceed 40 million by 2030, it would become just a money pit. On the other hand, it will take at least 4 years to eompleteand we can only imagine the havoc tell create, in a place where traffic has already become a nightmare, and that before any construction even gat started. And I didn't include the pollution, the noise, the dust and dirt, and all the suffering our city, our community and our street will have to endure, and last hot not least, the plummeting values of our pruperties. Spending this kind of moneyon such a controversial project, with so limited benefit, isn't just a wasteful spending, hutalso represents a major stress on the our county's finite reserves, that would divert critical financial and human resources from more important and smngent projects, with immediate and substantial benefits forour county and its residents, Concentrating most of the commercial developments along arteries like Pine Ridge Rd, and Immakalee Rd., and having access to Hwy 75 only through the same cornall it's in fact the real cause of all these traffic issues we've started having in the last 5 years and most likely we'll continue to have foryearsto come. Immakal.e Rd. corridor congestion is not an aeeident, poor planning for decades allowed this to happen. Tens of communities were built without suitable ameratles in their proximity, forcing people to drive to the same congestive shopping and commercial auras, in addition, the overwhelming —nolatinn and ina,fnrio-nt ma inr -do- rnadcfr Fact MI —all —Ind nr rr fate .4tl fDtdersare Up I dateconnected hn Microsoft E harl lijDi=_playietting n Kid ---� I . , r Lorraine M. Lantz, AICP Principal Planner Anew cou"ty Collier Coanly Capital Projects, Planning, Impact Fees 8 Program Management NOTE: Email Address Has Changed 2685 S. Horseshoe Drive, S.H. 4103 Naples, rL 341N Phone: (239) 252-5779 Lorraine.Laniz@CollierCounivFLaov From: Stephen Gordon <SIGordo@msn.com> Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 20212:14 PM To: LantzLorraine <Lorraine. Lantz@coll iercountyfl.gov> Cc: Marius Stela <askmarius@gmaj.com>; Gordon, Susan <suegart04@mac.com>; Nicholas Mealey <mealey.nicholas@gmail.com> Subject: Livingston overpass EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Cent= this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links Attn: Lorraine Lantz Project Manager Collier County Transportation Planning (239) 252-5779 I orrame. antz,a ollir er ounlvfl.govv Our community is in total disbelief that a project of such magnitude hasn't been openly discussed and/or presented to the public and to all parties that could be impacted by it. It's just incomprehensible how a project with so many ramifications for our county and its residents has been kept under the wraps until the last minute; providing just minimum information and the single option to submit all our comments to the County Transportation Planning Department until April 16a', 2021, without any further indication of a possible dialogue or feedback. This left us with almost no time to inform our communities and their owners, and very little time to prepare a proper response to this proposal. As this study title indicates, this is a proposal designed to address the traffic congestion along the Immokalee Rd. corridor, between Livingston Rd. and Collier Blvd. Unfortunately the proposed overpass on Livingston Rd. at Immokalee Rd., cannot and would not diminish any of the incoming traffic going on Immokalee Rd. coming from Livingston Rd., that number will just get bigger and bigger. On the contrary, by eliminating a critical lane on each side of the bridge and shrinking its width from six to four lanes, it'll actually reduce its maximum capacity by 30%, creating not just a backup at peak hours, but also posing a traffic hazard for those trying to exit Livingston, but could not find a proper gap to change lanes in a timely manner, and to those who couldn't switch to the middle lane soon enough before the outside lane ends. At the same true all traffic coming off Livingston Rd. would have to be redirected around the bridge and further on under the bridge and/or to the right or making a U-turn, creating even more obstacles and backups. The same applies for the traffic coming off Immokalee Rd. into Livingston Rd., including a substantial and disruptive traffic going in and out from Seed to Table plaza and Carlton Lakes Blvd. In addition to that, our community will face increased levels of noise and pollution, and the incurable external obsolescence of staring at a bridge, instead of watching a sunset. As previously admitted by your planners, the real solution in this case would have been an overpass on Immokalee Rd., not on Livingston Rd. Because of the proximity of Immokalee Rd. to the canal and the prohibitive cost of such challenging execution, your planners were constrained to abandon this approach. Despite all the facts and evidence pleading against the rationale of this proposed overpass and against any common sense, this proposal is taking on a life of its own; which raises the question, who is actually the beneficiary of this multimillion dollar project? By all means it's not us, neither the neighboring communities or businesses, nor our daily commuters or our county. Compared with the 38 million dollars Golden Gate Overpass in 2007, this new overpass with a projected budget of 30 to 35 million dollars, which might easily exceed 40 million by 2030, it would become just a money pit. On the other hand, it will take at least 4 years to complete and we can only imagine the havoc it'll create, in a place where traffic has already become a nightmare, and that before any construction even got started. And I didn't include the pollution, the noise, the dust and dirt, and all the suffering our city, our community and our street will have to endure, and last but not least, the plummeting values of our properties. Spending this kind of money on such a controversial project, with so limited benefit, isn't just a wasteful spending, but also represents a major stress on the our county's finite reserves, that would divert critical financial and human resources from more important and stringent projects, with immediate and substantial benefits for our county and its residents. Concentrating most of the commercial developments along arteries Eke Pine Ridge Rd. and Immokalee Rd., and having access to Hwy 75 only through the same corridors, it's in fact the real cause of all these traffic issues we've started having in the last 5 years and most likely we'll continue to have for years to come. Immokalee Rd. corridor congestion is not an accident, poor planning for decades allowed this to happen. Tens of communities were built without suitable amenities in their proximity, forcing people to drive to the same congestive shopping and commercial areas, in addition, the overwhelming population and insufficient major crossing roads from East to West, all sealed our fate. Before any additional highway interchanges to Hwy 75 will be put in place, either at Vanderbilt Rd. or Orange Blossom Rd., and/or at Veterans Memorial Rd.; interchanges which can divert substantial traffic from Immokalee Rd., Pine Ridge Rd. and Tamiami Rd. / Hwy 41, no other solutions would fix our traffic problems. We need to stop this 'overpass bonanza'. Our city reputation as one of the most beautiful places in United States it could be profoundly impacted, if such mega bridges will become our signature landmark. We can be smarter than that and can find more suitable solutions to our traffic problems, therefore preserve the prestige and image of our city and county. Entrusting you with the future development of our city and county, it's not a blank check. Your decisions cannot ignore the voice and needs of your constituents and your communities, also you always should take into account that your mandate is to protect and represent the interests of the people and communities of this county, which decisions shouldn't put any of us at disadvantage, but benefit us all. Considering our rights under The First Amendment to the Constitution, we are kindly asking you to review and suspend any decision regarding this proposed overpass at Livingston Rd. and Immokalee Rd., until a proper public hearing will be conducted and a town hall debate can take place, where questions could be answered, concerns could be addressed and a suitable solution could be found. Thank you for your continuing support and understanding Stephen Gordon 5115 Cobble Creek Cf. Unit 203 Naples FI. 805-390-6366 Under Flaritla Lew, a -mail atltlre — are public reco— If you tlo nal went your a -mail addr— rel —d in response to a public r—rtls request, tlo nut send electronic mail to ibis entity. Instead runt -ibis office by telephone or in writing. From: LantzLorraine To: Lisa 0"Toole Subject: [EXTERNAL] RE: Livingston Road overpass Date: Tuesday, May 11, 2021 2:25:31 PM Ms. O'Toole, We are currently working on scheduling a meeting with Carlton Lakes to discuss the Study. Please note that this is the public involvement phase of the corridor study. No final decision has been made. We appreciate your input and will add them to the project documentation and public record. As a reminder, we have placed a narrated video presentation on our project website to assist with understanding the Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study. Link to video: https://collier.granicus.com/player/clip/3004?view_id=4&redirect=true Thank you. Respectfully, Lorraine Lorraine M. Lantz, AICP Principal Planner r o 1r C,01414ty Collier County Capital Projects, Planning, Impact Fees & Program Management NOTE: Email Address Has Changed 2685 S. Horseshoe Drive, Suite #103 Naples, FL 34104 Phone: (239) 252-5779 Lorraine. Lantz@CollierCountyFL.aov From: Lisa O'Toole <lisaotoolefl@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2021 7:28 PM To: LantzLorraine <Lorraine.Lantz@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: Livingston Road overpass EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender 1 and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. As a homeowner in Carlton Lakes, I would like to express my concern regarding the possibility of an overpass on Livingston Road. The problem is not Livingston. The problem is too much growth with poor infrastructure planning We keep building with little thought as to how the roads can handle all the new residents. At the moment Pine Ridge and Immokalee roads are already clogged with traffic heading for the highway and the estates. We need another entry/exit on 175 perhaps using Vanderbilt or the new road being extended to US41 for the new high school in North Naples. Add access to 75 from one of them and it would greatly improve traffic flow. An overpass will be detrimental to Carlton Lakes and Seed to Table. It is hard enough to maneuver now - I can't imagine how an overpass which will have 2 lanes in each direction is going to be an improvement. Will we lose access to our south entrance if we are traveling north On exiting the complex, will we have to use the north entrance and hope to safely crossover 3 lanes of traffic - 2 of which will be flying down an overpass Have you seen Livingston Road when it turns into Imperial Parkway. It narrows to two lanes in each direction and is frequently backed up for miles, especially when 75 is backed up. The improvement needs to be done on the east/west corridors, not north/south. How has there not been a forum for us to meet with the planners and express our concern before now. Keep in mind many if us work, so an evening town hall would have been appreciated Respectfully, Lisa O'Toole Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. Attn: Lorraine Lantz Project Manager Collier County Transportation Planning (239) 252-5779 Our community is in total disbelief that a project of such magnitude hasn't been openly discussed and/or presented to the public and to all parties that could be impacted by it. It's just incomprehensible how a project with so many ramifications for our county and its residents has been kept under the wraps until the last minute; providing just minimum information and the single option to submit all our comments to the County Transportation Planning Department until April 16"', 2021, without any further indication of a possible dialogue or feedback. This left us with almost no time to inform our communities and their owners, and very little time to prepare a proper response to this proposal. As this study title indicates, this is a proposal designed to address the traffic congestion along the Immokalee Rd. corridor, between Livingston Rd. and Collier Blvd. Unfortunately the proposed overpass on Livingston Rd. at Immokalee Rd., cannot and would not diminish any of the incoming traffic going on Immokalee Rd. coming from Livingston Rd., that number will just get bigger and bigger. On the contrary, by eliminating a critical lane on each side of the bridge and shrinking its width from six to four lanes, it'll actually reduce its maximum capacity by 30%, creating not just a backup at peak hours, but also posing a traffic hazard for those trying to exit Livingston, but could not find a proper gap to change lanes in a timely manner, and to those who couldn't switch to the middle lane soon enough before the outside lane ends. At the same time all traffic coming off Livingston Rd. would have to be redirected around the bridge and further on under the bridge and/or to the right or making a U-turn, creating even more obstacles and backups. The same applies for the traffic coming off Immokalee Rd. into Livingston Rd., including a substantial and disruptive traffic going in and out from Seed to Table plaza and Carlton Lakes Blvd. In addition to that, our community will face increased levels of noise and pollution, and the incurable external obsolescence of staring at a bridge, instead of watching a sunset. As previously admitted by your planners, the real solution in this case would have been an overpass on Immokalee Rd., not on Livingston Rd. Because of the proximity of Immokalee Rd. to the canal and the prohibitive cost of such challenging execution, your planners were constrained to abandon this approach. Despite all the facts and evidence pleading against the rationale of this proposed overpass and against any common sense, this proposal is taking on a life of its own; which raises the question, who is actually the beneficiary of this multimillion dollar project? By all means it's not us, neither the neighboring communities or businesses, nor our daily commuters or our county. Compared with the 38 million dollars Golden Gate Overpass in 2007, this new overpass with a projected budget of 30 to 35 million dollars, which might easily exceed 40 million by 2030, it would become just a money pit. On the other hand, it will take at least 4 years to complete and we can only imagine the havoc it'll create, in a place where traffic has already become a nightmare, and that before any construction even got started. And I didn't include the pollution, the noise, the dust and dirt, and all the suffering our city, our community and our street will have to endure, and last but not least, the plummeting values of our properties. Spending this kind of money on such a controversial project, with so limited benefit, isn't just a wasteful spending, but also represents a major stress on the our county's finite reserves, that would divert critical financial and human resources from more important and stringent projects, with immediate and substantial benefits for our county and its residents. Concentrating most of the commercial developments along arteries like Pine Ridge Rd. and Immokalee Rd., and having access to Hwy 75 only through the same corridors, it's in fact the real cause of all these traffic issues we've started having in the last 5 years and most likely we'll continue to have for years to come. Immokalee Rd. corridor congestion is not an accident, poor planning for decades allowed this to happen. Tens of communities were built without suitable amenities in their proximity, forcing people to drive to the same congestive shopping and commercial areas, in addition, the overwhelming population and insufficient major crossing roads from East to West, all sealed our fate. Before any additional highway interchanges to Hwy 75 will be put in place, either at Vanderbilt Rd. or Orange Blossom Rd., and/or at Veterans Memorial Rd.; interchanges which can divert substantial traffic from Immokalee Rd., Pine Ridge Rd. and Tamiami Rd. / Hwy 41, no other solutions would fix our traffic problems. We need to stop this `overpass bonanza'. Our city reputation as one of the most beautiful places in United States it could be profoundly impacted, if such mega bridges will become our signature landmark. We can be smarter than that and can find more suitable solutions to our traffic problems, therefore preserve the prestige and image of our city and county. Entrusting you with the future development of our city and county, it's not a blank check. Your -decisions cannot ignore the voice and needs of your constituents and your communities, also you always should take into account that your mandate is to protect and represent the interests of the people and communities of this county, which decisions shouldn't put any of us at disadvantage, but benefit us all. - Considering our rights under The First Amendment to the Constitution, we are kindly asking you to review and suspend any decision regarding this proposed overpass at Livingston Rd. and Immokalee Rd., until a proper public hearing will be conducted and a town hall debate can take place, where questions could be answered, concerns could be addressed and a suitable solution could be found. Thank you for your continuing support and understanding. Signatures opposing the proposed Immokalee Road/Livingston Road bridge �� /.!lx ��'� � � CA, From: LantzLorraine To: Debbie Littman Cc: Kirby, Felicia; Gramer, Bill/SWF; Ross, Colleen/ORL Subject: [EXTERNAL] Carlton Lakes Meeting on 5/27 at 6 pm Date: Tuesday, May 11, 2021 2:08:38 PM Ms. Littman, We have confirmed that 5/27 is available. As previously discussed, we anticipate the meeting to start on the virtual platform (Teams) at 6:00 pm and conclude by 8:00 pm. I will follow-up with you when we have a link and sign-up directions for your residents. Thank you for your patience as we move forward coordinating this virtual meeting on 5/27/21 at 6:00 pm. Respectfully, Lorraine Lorraine M. Lantz, AICP Principal Planner o ie.-r 01414t Collier County Capital Projects, Planning, Impact Fees & Program Management NOTE: Email Address Has Changed 2685 S. Horseshoe Drive, Suite #103 Naples, FL 34104 Phone: (239) 252-5779 Lorraine. Lantz@CollierCountyFL.aov From: LantzLorraine Sent: Monday, May 10, 20214:12 PM To: 'Debbie Littman' <deb.lakeview@gmail.com> Subject: RE: meeting Ms. Littman, Thank you for the dates —Thursday 5/27 seems to work the best for the team but we also have to coordinate with the communications group who will facilitate the meeting using TEAMS (a similar virtual platform to Zoom). I will let you know when we hear from them. We prefer to use a full virtual platform instead of a partial one. Thank you. Respectfully, Lorraine Lorraine M. Lantz, AICP Principal Planner o i w owtt Collier County Capital Projects, Planning, Impact Fees & Program Management NOTE: Email Address Has Changed 2685 S. Horseshoe Drive, Suite #103 Naples, FL 34104 Phone: (239) 252-5779 Lorraine. Lantz@CollierCountyFL.aov From: Debbie Littman <deb.lakeview(@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, May 10, 2021 3:48 PM To: LantzLorraine <Lorraine.Lantz(@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: meeting EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Lorraine, Would either Monday May 24 or Thursday May 27 work for a 6pm meeting with our residents? Would you prefer a full Zoom conference or an in person meeting plus Zoom? Looking forward to this program, Debbie Littman Carlton Lakes Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. From: LantzLorraine To: Kirby. Felicia Subject: [EXTERNAL] FW: I-75 South Corridor Virtual Public Meeting Date: Friday, May 14, 2021 8:06:08 AM Lorraine M. Lantz, AICP Principal Planner C;O*IC-r 007414ty Collier County Capital Projects, Planning, Impact Fees & Program Management NOTE: Email Address Has Changed 2685 S. Horseshoe Drive, Suite #103 Naples, FL 34104 Phone: (239) 252-5779 Lorraine.Lantz@CollierCountvFL.aov From: LantzLorraine Sent: Friday, May 14, 2021 8:06 AM To: 'Marius Stoia' <askmarius@gmail.com> Subject: RE: 1-75 South Corridor Virtual Public Meeting Mr. Stoia, Yes, all written comments I become part of the public record and will be included in the documentation. Respectfully, Lorraine Lorraine M. Lantz, AICP Principal Planner 0#1�r 074"ty Collier County Capital Projects, Planning, Impact Fees & Program Management NOTE: Email Address Has Changed 2685 S. Horseshoe Drive, Suite #103 Naples, FL 34104 Phone: (239) 252-5779 Lorraine. Lantz@CollierCountyFL.aov From: Marius Stoia <askmarius(@gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, May 13, 2021 5:40 PM To: LantzLorraine <Lorraine.Lantz(@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: Re: 1-75 South Corridor Virtual Public Meeting EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Thank you Lorraine, I'm glad we've got this clarified, names can be confusing sometimes. Also, I hope our neighborhood petition, the one Joyce Zub dropped in person at your office on April 16th, 2021, has been added to your project documentation and it will be introduced to the Board members as well. Thank you again. Yours respectfully, Marius Stoia On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 8:28 AM LantzLorraine <Lorraine.Lantz(@colliercountyfl.gov> wrote: Mr. Stoia, Thank you for your comments, we will include them in the project documentation. It also clarifies who you spoke to at FDOT, as our coordination has never included anyone named Natalie. Respectfully, Lorraine Lorraine M. Lantz, AICP Principal Planner C;0)fleer County Collier County Capital Projects, Planning, Impact Fees & Program Management NOTE: Email Address Has Changed 2685 S. Horseshoe Drive. Suite #103 Naples. FL 34104 Phone: (239) 252-5779 Lorraine. Lantz@CollierCountyFL.aov From: Marius Stoia <askmarius(@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, May 12, 2021 6:53 PM To: LantzLorraine <Lorraine.Lantz(@colIiercountyfl.gov> Subject: Re: 1-75 South Corridor Virtual Public Meeting EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Hello Lorraine, Thank you for sending me this information. As I've mentioned to you last week, in our phone conversation, I've already spoke with Nicole Harris, but I'll definitely like to follow their events and updates. Your study proposal could be fundamentally influenced by theirs. Even you might have separate teams and goals to a certain point, our traffic system is just one, and it has no state or county boundaries, therefore both your solutions must complement each other. Best regards, Marius Stoia On Tue, May 11, 2021 at 4:00 PM LantzLorraine <Lorraine.Lantz(@colliercountyfl.gov> wrote: Good afternoon, I am forwarding the correspondence below from the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) regarding their 1-75 South Corridor project and Virtual Public Meeting invitation to you based on your interest in the Collier County Immokalee Road Congestion Corridor Study. The Collier County Study is being coordinated with the FDOT project; however it is important to note that the Collier County study is a separate study with different milestones, timelines and requirements. If you have any questions regarding the FDOT project, please contact the 1-75 Project Manager, Ms. Nicole Harris, P.E., at (863) 519-2335 or via e-mail at nicole.harris&dot.state.fl.us. You may also visit the project website at:.https://www.swflinterstates.com/i75-south-corridor. As always, if you have any questions regarding the Collier County Immokalee Road Congestion Corridor Study, you may contact me at Lorraine. Lantz&CollierCountyFL.gov or at 239-252-5779. You may also visit the Collier County Study website at: https://www.colliercountyfl.gov/planningstudies (under "Current — Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study"). Respectfully, Lorraine Lorraine M. Lantz, AICP Principal Planner Cofplcew County I awo"Mma"W Collier County Capital Projects, Planning, Impact Fees & Program Management NOTE: Email Address Has Changed 2685 S. Horseshoe Drive. Suite #103 Naples. FL 34104 Phone: (239) 252-5779 Lorraine. La ntz@Co11ierCountyFL.aov From: Sherrard, Kati<Kati.Sherrard(@dot.state.fl.us> Sent: Tuesday, May 11, 2021 1:01 PM To: Sherrard, Kati<Kati.Sherrard(@dot.state.fl.us> Subject: 1-75 South Corridor Virtual Public Meeting EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Appointed Official/Local Agency, The Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT), District One, is hosting a Virtual Public Outreach Meeting for the Southwest ConnectTm Interstate 75 (1-75) South Corridor Master Plan from south of SR 951 (Collier Boulevard) to north of SR 78 (Bayshore Road) in Collier and Lee counties, Florida. This workshop will be held online and is available on the project website, www.SWFLInterstates.com/South-Corridor-VPM. The meeting materials will be available for viewing for 10 days, from June 8 - 18, 2021. In addition, FDOT is hosting a LIVE Question and Answer Event ONLINE from 5:00 p.m. - 6:30 p.m. on Tuesday, June 8, 2021. Please visit the project website listed above to register for the virtual Q&A event. If you would like to call into the question and answer session, please dial +1 (562) 247-8422 and enter access code 937-518-510. Attendees that use the call - in option will be able to listen only and will not be able to type in questions during the meeting. The virtual public outreach meeting materials include a virtual tour with multiple interactive stations containing video and other static displays all designed to update the public on the current status of the project and changes in its developmental direction. FDOT is mailing invitational postcards (attached) to property owners adjacent to the project and in surrounding areas. 1-75 Southwest ConnectTm (South Corridor) is a capacity, safety and operational improvement project on 1-75 in Collier and Lee Counties. This project is in the Planning and Feasibility Phase. FDOT will analyze the interstate system's existing transportation challenges. The findings of the analysis, as well as recommendations to enhance safety and mobility, are documented in a Master Plan. The planned improvements identified in the Master Plan may include widening, managed lanes, modifying interchanges, and/or evaluating new interchanges. The Master Plan will also include public outreach, such as this, which will serve as input in the identification and prioritization of projects to move forward into the Project Development Process. This long-range approach provides a regional perspective to identify the areas where future demand is predicted. This Master Plan will serve as a guide to allow FDOT to focus future efforts and funding toward the most critical areas first. FDOT solicits public participation without regard to race, color, national origin, age, sex, religion, disability, or family status. People who require special accommodations under the Americans with Disabilities Act or who require translation services (free of charge) should contact Cynthia Sykes, District One Title VI Coordinator, at (863) 519-2287, or email at Cvnthia.Sykes@dot.state.fl.us at least seven days prior to the public workshop. The Florida Department of Transportation may adopt this planning product into the environmental review process, pursuant to Title 23 U.S.C. § 168(d)(4), or to the state project development process. If you or anyone you know does not have internet access and would like copies of this information, or if you have further questions about the project, please contact the 1-75 Project Manager, Ms. Nicole Harris, P.E., at (863) 519-2335 or via e-mail at nicole.harris@dot.state.fl.us. You may also visit the project website at: https://www.swflinterstates.com/i75-south-corridor. Sincerely, Kati C. Sherrard, PE, CPM Interstate Program Manager I Resident Engineer - Interstate/Pushbutton Florida Department of Transportation - District One Office: (863) 519-2590 Cell: (941) 465-0411 www.swflinterstates.com Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. 4�r =��— trxrraruLl RE: pa,� Thursday, may L3, 20215:":,s PN Angela, I hope the information below regarding the Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study provides you with the requested information. Intersections Studied Nine intersections are being studied along the corridor (labeled "A" through "I"). Please reference the project aerial with highlighted squares for the location of each intersection. The following summarizes the recommended solution for each intersection. • A, Livingston Rd. — Convert to a Single Point Urban Interchange (SPUI) commonly known as an Overpass. The recommendation is to bridge Livingston Road over Immokalee Road. The bridge is proposed as 4 lanes (2 lanes in each direction). An additional southbound left turn at Livingston Road is also proposed. Through traffic along Livingston Road would not be required to stop, improving the traffic operations at this intersection. This is similar to the intersection at Golden Gate Parkway and Airport Road, where Golden Gate Parkway goes over Airport Road. • B Juliet Blvd /Strand Blvd — Widen the bridge along the southbound side of intersection, add turn lanes and increase the length of the left turn lanes. — Convert to a Diverging Diamond Interchange (DDI). For this recommendation traffic patterns will only change along Immokalee Road; there • will be no change to the traffic pattern on 1-75. Traffic on Immokalee Road will shift (or diverge) to the opposite side of the road as it passes under 1-75 and will be controlled by a traffic signal. A DDI configuration is unusual in that it requires traffic to briefly drive on the opposite side of the road in this case while under 1-75). Large overhead signs, barriers and/or pavement markings will be used to direct traffic. DDle are becoming more popular in Florida, as they are an innovative solution to reduce delay and increase mobility and safety. There is a fully operational DDI at 1-75 and University Parkway in Samsota. FDOT is currently constructing a DDI at 1-75 and Colonial Boulevard in Fort Myers. • E: Northbrooke Dr.lTarpon Say Blvd. — Widen the bridge along the southbound side of intersection, add turn lanes and increase the length of the left turn lanes. • F: Oakes Blvd. — Restripe existing lanes to add through/right turn lane and increase the length of the left turn lanes. • G: Valewood Dr. — Restripe existing lanes to add through/right turn lane and dedicated right turn lane. • H: Executive Dr. — Restripe existing lanes to add through/right turn lane. • I, Logan Blvd — Reconstruct the intersection to include a Partial Displaced Left Turn (PDLT) also known as a Continuous Flow Intersection (CFI) along Immokalee Road. The PDLT reconfigures the roadway by allowing vehicles to cross to the left side of the roadway before the intersection, which allows for multiple traffic movements that are not possible at conventional signalized intersections. This improvement will increase signal efficiency by allowing for longer green times at each leg of the intersection. Some of the recommended intersection solutions above are innovative for this area. To find out more about the intersections or to see the conceptual designs and simulated animations demonstrating how a vehicle moves through the more complicated intersections, please view the following video: Immokalee Congestion Study Video The video is approximately 30 minutes long. If you prefer not to watch the entire video, it is bookmarked so that you can skip to the intersection(a) you are most concerned about. The video is also available on the project website located at: httosJ/www.coiliercount4 aov/olanningstudia (under "Current— Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study"). The study is expected to be completed in the late Spring of 2021. Next Steps The Collier County Board of County Commissioners (BCC) is expected to hear this item at a regularly scheduled BCC meeting in the early summer of 2021. When a final date is determined it will be placed on the project website located at: httos //www colliercount f�l gov/olann ngstudies (under "Current— Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study"). All BCC Meetings are open to the public. They begin at 9:00 AM and are held in the BCC Chambers located on the 3rd Floor of the Collier County Government Center, 3299 Tamiami Trail East, Naples, FL 34112. If these recommendations move forward, the County will work towards funding them in the capital improvement budget. The following projects were identified in the Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) as cost feasible for design and construction in the following time periods: • 1-75/Immokalee Road Interchange between 2026-2030 (in coordination with the Florida Department of Transportation - FOOT) • Livingston Road and Immokalee Road Intersection between 2026-2030 • Immokalee Road and Logan Boulevard Intersection between 2031-4045 These timeframes are subject to change as funding and transportation needs change. Should you have any questions on this project or would like to request a presentation, please contact me at Lorraine LantzeColl'erCountyFL Dov or at 239-252-5779. Any comments or questions you make will become part of the public record and study documentation. Respectfully, Lorraine Lorraine M. Lantz, AICP Principal Planner Collier County Collies County d.pR. Psojech, Planning,.m 1fees a -ore. Management -1E. Email Ae-,, — C—Ee d 2685 s. Hgrs h—Drive, State N103 Naples, FL -04 ne: (2a97 25A5119 From: Angel,,angele.morcos@gmaii.com> Sem: Thursday, May 13, 20215:05 PM To: LantzLorraine,Lorraine.Lantz@colliercountyfl.gm> Subject: Livingston project EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is Gam an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Hello Ms Lantz, I've learned that collier county is looking to make modifications to the intersection of Immokalee and Livingston. Are there ressources or plans that can be shared? As a resident of the area, Id like to better understand what these changes are. Thanks, Angela Ueder FI-1. cow,—,- aaaressaa ere w.c re-om It yo do 1w y .—I add.. reieaaad inreaP—maP 1.u.—re—t. do eor aaed e1---1.min amity. Inarcad, Doman rma onion, raieP—or,ow 9 From: LantzLorraine TO: Q Subject: [EXTERNAL] RE: Immokalee Rd., Corridor congestion study Date: Friday, May 21, 2021 3:32:06 PM Lori, Thank you for your comments. We will try to incorporate responses to your concerns into the presentation on 5/27/21. If you have not already done so, you may register for the presentation at the following link: htt 0/urldefense.corn/v3/ https://www.eventbrite.com/e/immokalee-road-corridor-congestion-study-virtual-public-information- meeting-re,gistration- 154470219585_:! !B5cixuoO7ltTeg! REmu2j oauc36bj GdiKm2H5XzgL8NmebW 9iYec3qlAj2jEu9usCv7ZymK7LghB3kS6Yc5xw$ Respectfully, Lorraine Lorraine M. Lantz, AICP Principal Planner Collier County Capital Projects, Planning, Impact Fees & Program Management NOTE: Email Address Has Changed 2685 S. Horseshoe Drive, Suite #103 Naples, FL 34104 Phone: (239) 252-5779 Lorraine.Lantz@CollierCountyFL.gov -----Original Message ----- From: Lori <luvjim737@gmail.com> Sent: Friday, May 21, 2021 3:14 PM To: LantzLorraine <Lorraine.Lantz@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: Immokalee Rd., Corredor congestion study EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Hello Lorraine, I am a resident of Carlton Lakes, I am writing you in regards to the Immokalee Rd., Corredor study. I know congestion on Immokalee Road is an issue... My thoughts and concerns of traffic over the years, are due in part to the lack of an on/off ramp at I75 & Vanderbilt, is causing an extra undue burden to Immokalee as well as Pine Ridge. I feel that Collier Counties consideration of building an overpass on Livingston Rd., which is a residential access road, will cause (extreme) noise pollution, a concrete eyesore, as well as a property devaluation for all the adjacent residential communities! I also, do not believe that an overpass and lane expansion, will just alleviate traffic as it will cause an increase since, this proposed project will be the largest gateway for east and west bound commuters in north Naples. The vast majority of the traffic is due in part by are snowbirds and vacationers, traffic in general is only at its worst January -April! Thank you for your time! Sincerely, Lori Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. From: LantzLorraine To: Mark Mysliborski Subject: [EXTERNAL] RE: Valewood & Executive dr. Date: Monday, May 24, 2021 2:55:17 PM Mr. and Mrs. Mysliborski, Thank you for your comments on our study. I have also forwarded your comments and the petition to our Traffic Operations Department. If they have any additional information, they will reach out to you. Respectfully, Lorraine Lorraine M. Lantz, AICP Principal Planner Cv -per County Collier County Capital Projects, Planning, Impact Fees & Program Management NOTE: Email Address Has Changed 2685 S. Horseshoe Drive, Suite #103 Naples, FL 34104 Phone: (239) 252-5779 Lorraine. Lantz@CollierCountyFL. From: Mark Mysliborski <dogcjl@centurylink.net> Sent: Monday, May 24, 2021 2:22 PM To: LantzLorraine <Lorraine.Lantz@colliercountyfl.gov> Cc: Mark Mysliborski <dogcjl@centurylink.net> Subject: Valewood & Executive dr. EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. To Collier County, I'm writing to you In hopes that you will be as concerned as we the home owners living in the communities on Valewood Dr. The cut through from Executive Dr. onto Valewood dr. is a very dangerous and concerning situation... Last year my husband and I was one of those victims.. Three days later coming down Valewood to go to the doctors, I couldn't believe it another accident occurred taking the ladies car door off was really bad.... I'm sure if you check last years, and this years police reports there are many. From people doing U turns on the left side of valewood back onto executive dr.To people doing U turns at the light on Immokalee, where it clearly says no U turns. People turning off of Valewood onto Immokalee cause they have the right away, not expecting someone to do a U turn at the light.. Bang... Drivers for some reason cannot read or obey the law there!!!! It really is just a matter of time before it becomes more than an accident to a tragedy... Last week a car came across executive dr. with no stop at all, putting the other car coming down Valewood into the utility road, she was ok, driver from executive dr. didn't even stop or look she was on her cell phone ... Close.. Maybe a solution would be to close the cut through as was done on the Strand, Executive dr. than can make a right turn , go down and than enter valewood dr. Executive dr. also has access to Immokalee at mobile station, making a right, than a right at light to Valewood dr. if that's where they need to be.... Something has to be addressed in this very dangerous situation, PLEASE HELP .. Also the landscaping coming up Valewood where the ginger is planted is to high, for cars to have a clear view of executive dr. before they get there. Same with coming out of executive dr. I have a signed petition from some homeowners with the same concerns.. We are all concerned for the well being of drivers and their lives, leaving or coming into this community!!! Thank you Mark and Cindy Mysliborski Note; will be sending signed petition with 2 part letter. Sent from Mail for Windows 10 Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. rot 4 N elf Aj f4p /�� )A ji AAil) I�} ti 7_ ell, Ile wt .'s IL 9 41 i f k r _p 0 F i - Der -V dk I Rk LM,;L 'r 4r ~ k F rr �..� 77� ' * # %I . 1V'PI nAl-2i � ' ii +- y. r + t. ir k- 4 f r 7 i i +y �Y. 4- {_ M r r I f -F f -OILY r f , f - • - � f� Y �' ��+ f�~� a � 'f 'ram � � ¢ � ti� ^' - •�y} ' t1k o k+F r r Y • 41 .k Ll � r Al C t t I IW From: LantzLorraine To: torn brver Cc: David Aoolebv; Thomas Wonsiewicz; tony ciros; geoff Iles; barbara brver Subject: [EXTERNAL] RE: Carlton Lakes South impacts of proposed Livingston Overpass Date: Wednesday, June 2, 2021 2:30:08 PM Mr. Bryer, Thank you for your comments. Yes, they will be added to the project documentation and the public record. The Collier County Chief Engineer met with Carlton Lakes representatives and your consultant to discuss the Traffic Signal Warrant Analysis. The conclusion of that meeting was that traffic signal warrants at the intersection of Carlton Lakes Blvd., Delasol Ln. and Livingston Rd. were not met. Please note that this project is the Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study from Livingston Road to Logan Boulevard. The maps, graphics and proposed concepts shown and on our website, are to help demonstrate the conceptual design. The Board of County Commissioners will have an opportunity to approve the Study and the recommendations. If the recommendations move forward, the County will work to fund the next phase in the capital improvement budget. The next phase for the Immokalee Rd. and Livingston Rd. intersection is design. Please let me know if you have any additional questions. Respectfully, Lorraine Lorraine M. Lantz, AICP Principal Planner Collier County Capital Projects, Planning, Impact Fees & Program Management NOTE: Email Address Has Changed 2685 S. Horseshoe Drive, Suite #103 Naples, FL 34104 Phone: (239) 252-5779 Lorraine.Lantz@CollierCountyFL.gov -----Original Message ----- From: tom bryer <tebryer@yahoo.com> Sent: Tuesday, June 1, 2021 1:48 PM To: LantzLorraine <Lorraine.Lantz@colliercountyfl.gov> Cc: David Appleby <dwapplebyjr@gmail.com>; Thomas Wonsiewicz <tjwons@me.com>; tony ciros <tcirosr@comcast.net>; geoff Iles <ilestumer@gmail.com>; barbara bryer <bjbryer@hotmail.com> Subject: Carlton Lakes South impacts of proposed Livingston Overpass EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Lorraine I listened to the virtual public meeting for the Livingston Immokalee redesign and make the following comments: 1. It was stated as part of the presentation that our consultant found that the proposed signal at the north entrance did not meet signal warrants. It is my understanding that our consultant did find existing volumes at the north entrance to be insufficient to warrant a signal. However, due to the difficulties currently trying to turn left at the north entrance, many CL residents use the south exit and use the U turn lane to go south on Livingston. I believe the consultant study indicated that should a signal be added to the north entrance, there would be sufficient diversion of the south exiting U turn movements to the safe exiting north exit to warrant a signal at the north entrance. 2. In my opinion, the proposed Livingston overpass design will CREATE a dangerous maneuver for those CL residents using the U turn lane to go south on Livingston. Currently, the Immokalee-Livingston traffic signal creates large gaps to northbound Livingston traffic making it somewhat easy and safe for CL traffic to move over to the inside thru lane to make the U turn. However, with the proposed design, gaps will be more random and unpredictable because Livingston traffic will be free flow. Compounding the problem, Livingston traffic will increase due to continued development along Livingston plus some diversion from I-75 traffic due to the overpass. Speeds on Livingston northbound should also increase due to the overpass, and coupled with reduced sight distance associated with the over vertical on Livingston will increase the potential severity and frequency of crashes involving weaving CL residents. The option of shifting the U turn lane further north to provide increased length for the CL weave maneuver across the 2 thru Livingston lanes is restricted by the current left turn lane at the north entrance and in my opinion is inadequate to address the weaving concerns stated above. I urge Collier County to rethink the design of the Immokalee-Livingston intersection so that safety is not compromised for Carlton Lakes residents. I trust that these comments can be made part of the public comments. Tom Bryer PS -Prior to retirement I was Director PennDOT Bureau of Highway Safety and Traffic Engineering. After PennDOT, as a consultant, I also developed a statewide intersection safety plan for Florida DOT. Sent from my iPad Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. From: LantzLorraine To: Kirby. Felicia Subject: [EXTERNAL] FW: CODE 8502 / Valewood dr (Mark Mysliborski ) Date: Friday, June 18, 2021 1:16:16 PM See Below — it came in as a comment for the Immokalee Study but was really related to Code Enforcement. I think we track it anyway. Lorraine Lorraine M. Lantz, AICP Principal Planner 0 71�r 001414ty Collier County Capital Projects, Planning, Impact Fees & Program Management NOTE: Email Address Has Changed 2685 S. Horseshoe Drive, Suite #103 Naples, FL 34104 Phone: (239) 252-5779 Lorraine. Lantz@CollierCountyFL. From: ScavoneMichelle <Michelle.Scavone@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Friday, June 18, 2021 10:59 AM To: dogcjl@centurylink.net Cc: LetourneauJeffrey <Jeffrey.Letourneau@colliercountyfl.gov>; Eric Short <Eric.Short@colliercountyfl.gov>; PerezCristina <Cristina.Perez@ col liercountyfl.gov>; LantzLorraine <Lorraine.Lantz@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: CODE 8502 / Valewood dr (Mark Mysliborski ) Mr. Mysliborski Code Enforcement Supervisor Short made a site visit and observed the vegetation in question. Although the landscaping is maintained to code, staff did see an area that could use improvement to assist in addressing the concern. Staff researched the ownership and have made contact with Quail Creek HOA, one of the five associations who maintains the vegetation on Valewood Drive. The landscaping vendor has been instructed to trim down the vegetation in the center of the median and they confirmed the work will be conducted. On Behalf of Cristina Perez, Code Enforcement Investigative Supervisor Michelle Scavone, Operations Coordinator From: Mark Mysliborski <dogcjl(cDcenturylink.net> Sent: Tuesday, June 8, 20218:29 PM To: LantzLorraine <Lorraine,Lantz(a colIiercountyfl.gov> Subject: Valewood dr Hi Lorraine, I wrote to you a couple of weeks ago in reference to Valewood dr. and executive dr. Well there has been another accident today. I hate to disrupt the plantings that the communities put so much into,. But you really have to drive from Quail village, Longshore Lakes, to head out. Than you'll see how tall the plants are that traffic from executive can't see nor can we . I watched a lady the other day inch out stretching her neck to see past plantings. I think it could help some, but not fix the dangerous issue coming across executive onto Valewood. It just a very dangerous right away..... Thankyou Sent from Mail for Windows 10 Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. From: LantzLorraine To: Kirby. Felicia Subject: [EXTERNAL] FW: Livingston/Immokalee intersection Date: Tuesday, May 18, 2021 8:57:45 AM Attachments: Proposed Bridge at Livingston.docx FYI Lorraine M. Lantz, AICP Principal Planner O 7Y 0T4ft Collier County Capital Projects, Planning, Impact Fees & Program Management NOTE: Email Address Has Changed 2685 S. Horseshoe Drive, Suite #103 Naples, FL 34104 Phone: (239) 252-5779 Lorraine.Lantz@CollierCountyFL.gov From: LantzLorraine Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2021 8:54 AM To: 'Larry & Linda Beer' <landlbeer@aol.com> Subject: RE: Livingston/Immokalee intersection Mr. Beer, Thank you for your questions. We will try to incorporate them into the presentation on 5/27/21. Please feel free to follow-up after the presentation. Respectfully, Lorraine Lorraine M. Lantz, AICP Principal Planner C;o*-ie,-rC;0-1414tY Collier County Capital Projects, Planning, Impact Fees & Program Management NOTE: Email Address Has Changed 2685 S. Horseshoe Drive, Suite #103 Naples, FL 34104 Phone: (239) 252-5779 Lorraine, Lantz@CollierCounfyFL.aov From: Larry & Linda Beer <landlbeer@aol.com> Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2021 8:11 AM To: LantzLorraine <Lorraine.Lantz@colliercountyfl.gov> Cc: Larry & Linda Beer <landlbeer@aol.com> Subject: Livingston/Immokalee intersection EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Ms. Lance, attached are our comments on the proposed bridge. Thank you for your indulgence. Larry Beer, long time resident of Carlton Lakes when Livingston was a gravel strip between Immokalee and Imperial. Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. Proposed Bridge at Livingston/Immokalee intersection We are not in favor of this solution for several reasons and although the proposed bridge would certainly help smooth out the flow of traffic on that section of Immokalee it does not really address the real problem which is too much traffic as a result of more and more development further east on Immokalee. Perhaps a better use of these funds would be to add an exit on 1-75 at Vanderbilt Beach Rd so that that street could take some of the east -west traffic. But here are our objections based on our understanding of the drawing: 1. The bridge does direct harm to Carlton Lakes and to a lesser extent Seed to Table because our main entrance and Seed to Table's western entrance would be inaccessible to vehicles travelling northbound on Livingston. a. Although C.L. residents could use our northern entrance, at an inconvenience to some, visitors, contractors, school buses etc. could not use that entrance unless we duplicated the gate scenario that we have at our main (southern) entrance. This would entail great expense to Carlton Lakes. b. The other alternative would be to utilize our main entrance by using the existing U-Turn lane to reverse direction then heading south and using the crossover to our main entrance. That crossover is not shown on the drawing as we suspect it is under the bridge and it would add confusion. However, that solution would create its own set of problems as one would have to be in the left lane soon after you are clear of the bridge. Many times, the current back up at the U-Turn lane can be four cars long. We foresee that it would only be more crowded and more dangerous at its present location. c. Seed to Table traffic currently uses our main entrance road to access their rear entrance for their southbound Livingston traffic, their truck loading docks and their parking lot shuttle. They also use the aforementioned crossover. Since their western entrance would now be inaccessible for northbound Livingston traffic, they would have the same U-Turn scenario to contend with but that would add all new traffic for our entrance road as those vehicles would have previously used the western Seed to Table entrance. More wear and tear on our entrance road. 2. Livingston would become the north -south primary road/speedway. It would be even faster and more dangerous road. Those turning right into our northern entrance and those turning left into the Delasol development on the west side of Livingston would surely be at greater risk. 3. Although we think that this idea was modeled after the successful Golden Gate/Airport bridge scenario no developments were affected in that case, certainly not in the detrimental manner that Carlton Lakes would endure. We can only imagine what this will do to our property values. It cannot be good. Has there been any research done in this area? 4. What is the construction time frame for a project of this magnitude? We ask that these comments/questions be addressed at the upcoming meeting. Thank you. Larry and Linda Beer, 5275 Birmingham Dr., Unit 102, Naples, FL 34110 May 16,2021 From: LantzLorraine To: Debbie Littman Cc: Kirby, Felicia Subject: [EXTERNAL] RE: additional questions Date: Wednesday, May 26, 2021 8:28:19 AM Ms. Littman, Thank you for forwarding these questions to us. Many seem similar to the questions we received. We will try to address them directly in the presentation. Thank you. Respectfully, Lorraine Lorraine M. Lantz, AICP Principal Planner C;ori;-r Ceo-unty Collier County Capital Projects, Planning, Impact Fees & Program Management NOTE: Email Address Has Changed 2685 S. Horseshoe Drive, Suite #103 Naples, FL 34104 Phone: (239) 252-5779 Lorraine. Lantz@CollierCountyFL.aov From: Debbie Littman <deb.lakeview@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, May 25, 2021 9:20 PM To: LantzLorraine <Lorraine.Lantz@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: additional questions EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Lorraine, I just received these questions. If it is not too late and if not redundant, could someone also address these questions. I am looking forward to your program on Thursday, Sincerely, Debbie Littman, President Carlton Lakes 1. Has a traffic noise study been completed to determine the impact of the overpass on surrounding communities at the Livingston & Immokalee intersection? 2. Will noise barrier walls be installed on the overpass? 3. How will a driver access the South -bound lanes on Livingston from both the North & South Carlton Lakes Blvd gates? o Will the existing U-turn lane located on Livingston North of Carlton Lakes Blvd - South Main Gate remain? o Will a traffic light be installed at Carlton Lake Blvd- North Gate & Livingston for left turns to access South bound Livingston lanes due to the projected increase in traffic? 4. Will there still be a left turn lane from South -bound Livingston to enter Carlton Lakes Blvd South Main Gate entrance for residents & vendors that must use the entry code kiosk? 5. Please see attached photo. What do the three red -dashed lines mean? The middle line, which is not identified with a letter bisects our carport and building. Will vehicles be visible at this point? Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. From: LantzLorraine To: Debbie Littman Cc: robs5230(abgmail.com; Kirby. Felicia; Gramer, Bill/SWF Subject: [EXTERNAL] RE: jpegs from carlton lakes mtg Date: Thursday, May 6, 2021 11:08:36 AM Ms. Littman, We are coordinating with our communications group for available dates. We were anticipating having it virtually in the evening, possible times would be from 6:00 pm to 8:00 pm. Assuming some of your residents work and need to commute home, however we are flexible. If your residents are used to a certain time for meetings (earlier, later, etc.) we would be happy to accommodate that. Typically we do not have meetings on a Friday, however if your community is used to that, we will accommodate. If you would prefer during the day instead of the evening, we can accommodate that as well. I think it would help if we had questions from your residents in advance that way we can develop a presentation to address those questions and then allow the moderator to receive the additional questions in the chat box. I anticipate many of the questions would be about the same general topics we discussed last week. Respectfully, Lorraine Lorraine M. Lantz, AICP Principal Planner 0ofiiPe.1rC;074"tY Collier County Capital Projects, Planning, Impact Fees & Program Management NOTE: Email Address Has Changed 2685 S. Horseshoe Drive, Suite #103 Naples, FL 34104 Phone: (239) 252-5779 LantzgCollierCountyl`L.gov From: Debbie Littman <deb.lakeview@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, May 5, 2021 2:23 PM To: LantzLorraine <Lorraine.Lantz@colliercountyfl.gov> Cc: robs5230@gmail.com; Kirby, Felicia <Felicia.Kirby2@jacobs.com>; Gramer, Bill/SWF <BiII.Gram er@jacobs.com> Subject: Re: jpegs from carlton lakes mtg EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Lorraine, We have been using Zoom meetings with the chat box for the past year; so residents are familiar with the process. We could have anywhere from 10 to 50+ people. If we solicit pre -meeting questions, we might be able to gauge participation. We also do sessions in the clubhouse with the ability to project documents on the screen if you would prefer that format. Your format should work well for the program. When we settle on a date, Do you have a preference of date and time? Sincerely, Debbie Littman, President Carlton Lakes On Wed, May 5, 2021 at 11:14 AM LantzLorraine <Lorraine. LantzPcolliercountyfLgov> wrote: Mr. Strutzel and Ms. Littman, Thank you for your email. We are working on reducing the size and format and will send it to you. We are also working on the meeting format for your residents. We did not really discuss the logistics on Friday. We were wondering how many people do you anticipate logging in and attending/participating? For format, we were thinking of an overview discussion of the project, then we could respond to any questions that you prepare for us in advance and then open it to additional resident questions. We could take comments in a chat box type format. What format are your residents accustomed to with your Board meetings? Are those virtual also? Please let me know what your residents expect from the meeting so we can develop it appropriately. Thank you, Respectfully, Lorraine Lorraine M. Lantz, AICP Principal Planner o ie-r Oomnty Collier County Capital Projects, Planning, Impact Fees & Program Management NOTE: Email Address Has Changed 2685 S. Horseshoe Drive, Suite #103 Naples, FL 34104 Phone: (239) 252-5779 Lorraine. Lantz@CollierCountyFL.aov From:.robs5230(@gmail.com <robs5230(@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, May 5, 2021 10:20 AM To: LantzLorraine <Lorraine.Lantz(@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: jpegs from carlton lakes mtg EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Hi Lorraine, When you are ready to send us pictures (jpeg)of the road layouts presented at the meeting, please send them to me at robs5230(@gmail.com, and not the att.net address I gave you at the meeting. Thank you Bob Strutzel Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. Kirby, Felicia From: LantzLorraine <Lorraine.Lantz@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Tuesday, July 6, 2021 11:31 AM To: Marius Stoia Subject: [EXTERNAL] RE: Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study Mr. Stoia, We understand this is personal to you and we want to try to answer your questions. We do not have definite answers to some of your questions because it is not the appropriate phase of the project to do the analysis. While our process may be lengthy, I can assure you that if the project moves forward from conceptual to actual design your questions regarding height, aesthetics, cost, construction time, etc. will be answered more definitively than the estimates we have discussed. One of your comments on Friday was that we did not look at or consider any other alternatives at the intersection of Livingston Rd. and Immokalee Rd. We had our consultant use the Intersection Control Evaluation (ICE) analysis which Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) considers a Best Practice. The analysis looked at the following types of intersections for all of the intersections in the corridor: ■ Diverging Diamond Interchange — running North -South ■ Diverging Diamond Interchange — running East-West ■ Single Point Urban Interchange — also known as an Overpass — running North -South ■ Single Point Urban Interchange (Overpass) — running East-West ■ Displaced Left Turn ■ Displaced Left Turn (interchange) — running North -South ■ Displaced Left Turn (interchange) — running East-West ■ Partial Displaced Left Turn — running North -South ■ Partial Displaced Left Turn — running East-West ■ Partial Median U-Turn — running North -South ■ Traffic Signal (Conventional signal improvements) ■ Echelon — running North -South ■ No -Build Please let me know if you have any additional questions. Respectfully, Lorraine Lorraine M. Lantz, AICP Principal Planner 1 • Cofl-r County Collier County Capital Projects, Planning, Impact Fees & Program Management NOTE: Email Address Has Changed 2685 S. Horseshoe Drive, Suite #103 Naples, FL 34104 Phone: (239) 252-5779 Lorraine. Lantz@CollierCou ntyFL.aov From: Marius Stoia <askmarius@gmail.com> Sent: Friday, July 2, 2021 5:38 PM To: LantzLorraine <Lorraine.Lantz@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: Re: Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Thank you Lorraine, Again, I really appreciate your openness and honesty, and thank you for hearing me out. I'm sure your colleague wasn't very pleased with my passionate expose, but you cannot please everyone. Too bad he doesn't live on my street, he would probably have had a total different opinion than he has now. It's easy to ignore what doesn't affect you and try to justify your argument just from a unilateral point of view. Fairness and correctness comes from including all possible aspects and factors into the equation, not choosing only those that support one's theory. I guess we'll march on, each on his own path and hopefully by the end common sense will prevail. Have a great weekend and a happy 4th!us Sincerely, Marius Stoia On Fri, Jul 2, 2021 at 4:11 PM LantzLorraine <Lorraine.Lantz@colliercountyfl.gov> wrote: Good afternoon, I am contacting you because of your continued interest Collier County's Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study. Please note that the project website has been updated to include more visualization graphics of the presentation materials. We also added additional frequently asked questions. The Study is tentatively scheduled for presentation to the Collier County Board of County Commissioners in September 2021. The project video and survey are still available on the project website located at: https://www.colliercountyfl.gov/planningstudies (under "Current — Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study"). Intersections included in the Study Should you have any questions on this project or would like additional information, please contact me at Lorraine. Lantz(c)CollierCountyFL.gov or at 239-252-5779. Respectfully, Lorraine Lorraine M. Lantz, AICP Principal Planner C;ofr1 wer County Collier County Capital Projects, Planning, Impact Fees & Program Management NOTE: Email Address Has Changed 2685 S. Horseshoe Drive, Suite #103 Naples, FL 34104 Phone: (239) 252-5779 Lorraine.Lantz@CollierCountyFL.gov Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. Kirby, Felicia From: Mark Trepanier <MTrepanier@AstonGardens.com> Sent: Saturday, July 31, 2021 1:33 PM To: ' La ntz Lo rra i n e' Cc: MonroyCarmen; Kirby, Felicia Subject: [EXTERNAL] RE: Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study Lorraine, Thank you for the meeting this week. It was very helpful. I will be following up with any additional questions and with Diana relative to signage. Our neighbor from St. Croix at Pelican Marsh is Joe Mathura, he is Association Manager. His contact information is: Email: stcroix@presidiocondo.com Phone: (239) 593-3434 Thank you again for your help. Best regards, Mark Trepanier Executive Director (239) 254-6261 Email: WrepanierL&AstonGardens.com ATN GARDEN` _ r At Pefican Marsh From: LantzLorraine <Lorraine.Lantz@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Tuesday, July 27, 2021 12:18 PM To: Mark Trepanier <MTrepanier@AstonGardens.com> Cc: MonroyCarmen <Carmen.Mon roy@colIiercountyfl.gov>; Kirby, Felicia <Felicia.Kirby2@jacobs.com> Subject: [EXTERNAL] RE: Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links, open attachments, or respond unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Mr. Trepanier, It was a pleasure meeting with you this morning. We hope we were able to provide you with a better understanding of the Immokalee Corridor Study and answer your questions. Please feel free to contact me with any additional questions you may have. Regarding Aston Gardens Signage, please contact Diana Compagnone in Operations and Regulations. She is a Plan Reviewer specifically dedicated to signage. Her contact information is: 239-252-2429 or Diana.Compagnone@CollierCountyFL.gov Respectfully, Lorraine Lorraine M. Lantz, AICP Principal Planner c 7i- County Collier County Capital Projects, Planning, Impact Fees & Program Management NOTE: Email Address Has Changed 2685 S. Horseshoe Drive, Suite #103 Naples, FL 34104 Phone: (239) 252-5779 Lorraine.Lantz@CollierCountyFL.aov From: Mark Trepanier <MTrepanier@AstonGardens.com> Sent: Monday, July 26, 20218:34 AM To: LantzLorraine <Lorraine.Lantz@colliercountyfl.gov> Cc: Gramer, Bill/SWF <13iII.Gramer@lacobs.com>; MonroyCarmen <Carmen.Monroe@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: RE: Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Thank you. See you tomorrow. Mark Trepanier Executive Director (239) 254-6261 Email: Wrepanier&AstonGardens.com ASTON RDE _ At Pelican: Ma 8Y Discriv,-r, l:i5i .: I.ixin4 From: LantzLorraine <Lorraine.Lantz@col liercountyfl.gov> Sent: Monday, July 26, 20218:10 AM To: Mark Trepanier <MTrepanier@AstonGardens.com> Cc: Gramer, Bill/SWF <Bill.Gramer@iacobs.com>; MonroyCarmen <Carmen.Monroy@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: [EXTERNAL] RE: Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links, open attachments, or respond unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Mr. Trepanier, Our address is: 2685 S. Horseshoe Drive, Suite #103, Naples, FL 34104. We will see you here tomorrow at 10am. Respectfully, Lorraine Lorraine M. Lantz, AICP Principal Planner C 7 Cty Collier County Capital Projects, Planning, Impact Fees & Program Management NOTE: Email Address Has Changed 2685 S. Horseshoe Drive, Suite #103 Naples, FL 34104 Phone: (239) 252-5779 Lorraine.Lantz@CollierCountyFL.gov From: Mark Trepanier <MTrepanier@AstonGardens.com> Sent: Friday, July 23, 20215:32 PM To: LantzLorraine <Lorraine.Lantz@colliercountvfl.gov> Cc: Gramer, Bill/SWF <Bill.Gramer@iacobs.com>; MonroyCarmen <Carmen.Monroy@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: RE: Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Yes that would be perfect. I can go to your office, we are having some upgrades done to our offices. What is your location? Mark Trepanier Executive Director (239) 254-6261 Email: WrepanierL&AstonGardens.com -41111116. In ATON GARDEN` _ At Pelican Marsh 1!y Disc uwery bruiur L[sing - From: LantzLorraine <Lorraine.Lantz@col liercountyfl.gov> Sent: Friday, July 23, 20214:59 PM To: Mark Trepanier <MTrepanier@AstonGardens.com> Cc: Gramer, Bill/SWF <Bill.Gramer@lacobs.com>; MonroyCarmen <Carmen.Monroe@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: [EXTERNAL] RE: Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links, open attachments, or respond unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Mr. Trepanier, Would 10am Tuesday work for you? We can come to your office if that is easier. Respectfully, Lorraine Lorraine M. Lantz, AICP Principal Planner Coliie-r Gounty Collier County Capital Projects, Planning, Impact Fees & Program Management NOTE: Email Address Has Changed 2685 S. Horseshoe Drive, Suite #103 Naples, FL 34104 Phone: (239) 252-5779 Lorraine. La ntz@CollierCou ntvFL.aov From: Mark Trepanier <MTrepanier@AstonGardens.com> Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2021 3:48 PM To: LantzLorraine <Lorraine.Lantz@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: RE: Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Thank you for the quick response. Could we meet in person next Tuesday morning? Anytime between 8.30 am and Noon. I could go to your office if that is easier. Best regards, Mark Trepanier Executive Director (239) 254-6261 Email: MTrepanierkAstonGardens.com ASTON GARDEN` At Pelican Marsh By DISC UVCrS SC31 iOF [.I%iINg From: LantzLorraine <Lorraine.Lantz@col liercountyfl.gov> Sent: Thursday, July 22, 2021 12:00 PM To: Mark Trepanier <MTrepanier@AstonGardens.com> Subject: [EXTERNAL] RE: Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links, open attachments, or respond unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Mr. Trepanier, Thank you for reaching out to me. We would welcome the opportunity to either meet with you in person or virtually so we can show you some maps and explain our conceptual plans. Are you available Monday (between gam-2:30pm) or Tuesday (all day) next week? Respectfully, Lorraine Lorraine M. Lantz, AICP Principal Planner C IC (Z;014ftty Collier County Capital Projects, Planning, Impact Fees & Program Management NOTE: Email Address Has Changed 2685 S. Horseshoe Drive, Suite #103 Naples, FL 34104 Phone: (239) 252-5779 Lorraine.Lantz@CollierCountvFL.gov From: Mark Trepanier <MTrepanier@AstonGardens.com> Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2021 2:33 PM To: LantzLorraine <Lorraine.Lantz@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: RE: Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Good Afternoon Mrs. Lantz, I hope this email finds you well. I am the Executive Director at Aston Gardens at Pelican Marsh. I have a few questions about section A of the Immokalee Corridor Study. Our community is just south of the intersection in question. We are trying to determine how this will impact our two entrances and exits. One on Immokalee and another on Livingston. Is there a time when I could call you to ask a few clarification questions? I know you must be extremely busy and would like approximately 15-20 minutes of your time. Please let me know what works for your schedule. Thank you in advance. Best regards, Mark Trepanier Executive Director Aston Gardens at Pelican Marsh 4800 Aston Gardens Way Naples, FL 34109 AstonGardens.com Office: 239.254.6261 Mobile: 239.571.0734 Email:MTrepanierkAstonGardens. com ASTON GARDEN' At_Pelican Marsh Hy oiscuwtry bCIli OF C.I%ing _ From: LantzLorraine <Lorraine.Lantz@col liercountvfl.gov> Sent: Friday, July 2, 20214:11 PM Subject: [EXTERNAL] Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links, open attachments, or respond unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Good afternoon, I am contacting you because of your continued interest Collier County's Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study. Please note that the project website has been updated to include more visualization graphics of the presentation materials. We also added additional frequently asked questions. The Study is tentatively scheduled for presentation to the Collier County Board of County Commissioners in September 2021. The project video and survey are still available on the project website located at: https://www.colliercountVfl.qov/planningstudies (under "Current — Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study"). Intersections included in the -Ilk F Lis oil Should you have any questions on this project or would like additional information, please contact me at Lorraine. Lantz�CollierCountyFLgov or at 239-252-5779. Respectfully, Lorraine Lorraine M. Lantz, AICP Principal Planner Ca�er GauN.ty Collier County Capital Projects, Planning, Impact Fees & Program Management NOTE: Email Address Has Changed 2685 S. Horseshoe Drive, Suite #103 Naples, FL 34104 Phone: (239) 252-5779 Lorraine.Lantz@CollierCountvFL.aov Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. From: Lantz Lorraine To: Mark Mysliborski Subject: [EXTERNAL] RE: Valewood dr. Date: Thursday, July 22, 2021 9:13:30 AM Mr. Mysliborski, Thank you for contacting me. I have forwarded this to the appropriate department to review and respond to your question. They will respond to you directly. Respectfully, Lorraine Lorraine M. Lantz, AICP Principal Planner k o i t 014M Collier County Capital Projects, Planning, Impact Fees & Program Management NOTE: Email Address Has Changed 2685 S. Horseshoe Drive, Suite #103 Naples, FL 34104 Phone: (239) 252-5779 Lorraine. Lantz@CollierCountyFL.aov From: Mark Mysliborski <dogcjl@centurylink.net> Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2021 11:22 AM To: LantzLorraine <Lorraine.Lantz@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: Valewood dr. EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Good morning Lorraine, I was wondering if someone could look at the conditions of Valewood dr. in need of some road repairs,and pot holes... Is there anytime in the future of resurfacing road? It is pretty beat up!!! Thank you for all you that you do!! Sent from Mail for Windows 10 Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. Appendix E.7 Media Articles and Notifications from Communities 4/1 /2021 Collier County conducts traffic study survey for future of Immokalee Road Novo I6ATJPDAT HE¢C HRLOYM IFS Resources Mde n Uwfokalee Roa ®6 XMI bl* II1w1 Collier County Board of County Commissioners is looking to determine how bad traffic is along Immokalee Road between Livingston Road and Logan Boulevard and reviewing what can be done about it. A traffic study survey is being conducted to get a better idea about how the county can best keep traffic from getting backed up on the roadway, especially during rush hour. "Number one frustration would be traffic;" Brennan Fitzgerald said. It takes longer to get places, and frustrations build behind the wheel. "Are you kidding?" Jones Siciliano said. "Much worse, much, much this year for sure "Naples is a beautiful place, and people want to move here;" Fitzgerald said. Many in Collier County have issues on Immokalee Rd. "We live on Immokalee, and that's really bad;" Siciliano said. Collier County Sheriffs Office admitted it after posting a meme on its Facebook page saying, "We get it, friends. We drive there too. Be patient. Stay focused and obey traffic laws." The county says, if nothing is done to improve Immokalee Rd by 2040, it will be even worse. That's why commissioners want community input. On Oakes Boulevard and Immokalee Road, the county would like to add a right turn lane and increase the length of the left turn lane. At spots located at the southbound and northbound on and off ramps for I-75 at Immokalee Rd., the county thinks a diverging diamond interchange would also help. "I don't know how they would make it wider," Siciliano said. "It's impossible." The areas of focus are nine major intersections from Livingston Rd. to Logan Blvd. Since developments and canals are on either side of the road, they're looking for alternative solutions, which includes extending turn lanes or creating an overpass. "Anything they can do should be helpful," Siciliano said. For now, drivers should stay alert and remain patient on the roads. "We know that's what it is, and we smile, nod and keep ongoing;" Fitzgerald said. If you're interested in helping decide the future of Immokalee Rd., the county hopes you will complete the traffic survey by April 16. MORE: • Immokalee road corridor congestion study public involvement survey • Collier County - Current Planning Studies https://www.win knews. com/2021 /O3/26/coll ier-cou nty-conducts-traffic-study-su rvey-for-future-of-immokalee-road/ 1 /2 4/1 /2021 Collier County conducts traffic study survey for future of Immokalee Road € epo E-Mihh ft tank Lo Do you see a typo or an error? Let us know. https://www.win knews. com/2021 /O3/26/coll ier-cou nty-conducts-traffic-study-su rvey-for-future-of-immokalee-road/ 2/2 6/28/2021 Collier County studying traffic congestion on Immokalee Road, looking for solutions COLLIER COUNTY Collier County studying traffic congestion on Immokalee Road, looking for solutions Published: April 21, 2021 5:54 PM EDT Updated: April 21, 2021 6:18 PM EDT Too many traffic lights and too much congestion. Those are some of the complaints people have about Immokalee Road in North Naples. "We always say Immokalee and Pine Ridge are the worst;" said Chloe Pankita, of Collier County. "We always avoid them and go around them." Pankita said she plans ahead whenever she has to go somewhere. "I always have to add in more time because there are so many lights on Immokalee," Pankita said. The Immokalee Road traffic study shows if nothing is done to help traffic congestion, by 2040 cars on the road are expected to go from 43,400 to 72,450. "It's gotten very much worse than it was a few years ago," said Doin Hicks, also of Collier County. That's why traffic engineers came up with nine major intersections on Immokalee Road from Livingston to Logan Boulevard that could use some work. They asked for community input and receive more than 600 responses. "Some of the feedback is, do it now like, why wait? We want something to happen," said Lorraine Lantz, project manager. "We are excited for these changes" While many people are on board with changes like adding a turn lane or putting an overpass, some plans are more complicated. "The diverging interchange is a little different. We've done the survey, and 40 percent said they haven't heard of it and they weren't familiar with it;" Lantz said. With that information, the county can now help people understand how it will help with traffic flow like it does at the I-75 ramp in Sarasota. "We are now moving forward and asking people and homeowner associations if they want us to meet with them to explain some of the recommendations;" Lantz said. The public comment period has been extended to April 30. After it is over, the findings will be provided to county commissioners. MORE: For more information on the traffic study for Immokalee Road or to participate in the public comment period, visit here and then look for the tab that says 'Current-Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study." Comments can also be made here. Reporter: Taylor Smith Writer: Melissa Montoya Do you see a typo or an error? Let us know. https://www.wi nknews.com/2021 /O4/21 /col lier-county-studying-traffic-congestion-on-immokalee-road-looki ng-for-solutions/ 1 /2 6/28/2021 Collier County studying traffic congestion on Immokalee Road, looking for solutions https://www.winknews.com/202l/O4/2l/collier-county-studying-traffic-congestion-on-immokalee-road-looking-for-solutions/ 2/2 6/25/2021 Livinston Lakes COA LIVINGSTON LAKES sm CON DOMI N I LJM ASSOCIATION MENU Welcome to Livingston Lakes Condominium Association Livingston Lakes Condominium Association is dedicated to ensuring the beauty, safety, and stability of the area, promoting neighborliness and pride among the residents, and forming a base for representation in matters affecting the community. Livingston Lakes Naples is set amidst 48 acres off of Livingston Road. This emerging gated -community consisting of Garden, Carriage, and Coach homes built by WCI, Southwest's Florida's preeminent creator of upscale residential communities enriched with luxury amenities. Beyond the peaceful lakes and nature preserves gracing Livingston Lakes Naples, residents will enjoy access to awesome amenities. The Livingston Lakes clubhouse will offer approximately 4,382 total square feet with 3,343 square feet of air-conditioned space. The clubhouse is equipped with catering kitchen and space sufficient for social gatherings. The clubhouse also has an intimate courtyard area perfect for outside affairs. There is also a state-of-the-art fitness center and resort -style swimming pool set beside an expansive sundeck. If you need more information or have an issue to bring to our attention, please follow the links for our Board Members or other appropriate contacts contained herein. https://Iivingstonlakescondo.com 1/2 6/25/2021 Livinston Lakes COA 8 Message Board • IMMOKALEE ROAD CORRIDOR CONGESTION STUDY PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT SURVEY • Submit a message to the Manager Copyright © 2021 Livington Lakes Condominium Association All rights reserved https://Iivingstonlakescondo.com 2/2 PRESIDENT'S REPORT The kiosk is being realigned after an up -close Work has begun in earnest with repairing curbs and repaving in the HOAs. Weather (downpours) and depleted asphalt plant can change the daily schedule. But steady pro- gress is being made toward the repaving on the boulevard. At the July Board of Directors meeting, pro- posals for 2022 vendor contracts were ap- proved in preparation for budget committee deliberations in the fall. A price increase to $40 for new entry tags was approved. The approved installation of a sidewalk, re- placing the widely spaced pavers between the clubhouse and tennis courts, will be a wel- come relief to Mom's navigating with strollers and we older folks who lack a widely spaced step. Electric panels for fountains on Lakes 4, 8, 11 and 16 will be replaced. The decay of these electric panels mirrors that process which is starting to impact residential units. The annual maintenance of the irrigation pump that services Master Association is cur- rently underway. The south gates have been removed for a much -needed sandblasting, weld repairs and painting. In the meantime the gate arms are in operation. encounter with a towed U-Haul trailer. It is important that we all be careful when approaching the kiosk and in some cases a driver must step out to reach the box if the vehicle is too large. Please remind your guests and vendors to exercise due caution. Suspension of use rights has been approved for four owners who are more than 90 days delinquent. This includes loss of cable and internet service as well as use of gate tags and amenities. This is an unfortunate but necessary step in our fiscal process. At a recent meeting presented by District 2 Commissioner Andy Solis, Lorraine Lantz, Planner in charge of the project, indicated that suggestions from our community presen- tation have been incorporated into the plan proceeding to the County Commission in Sep- tember. Note the new detail map accompanying this newsletter. Enjoy the remaining days of summer, IdMASTER BOARD k Deborah Littman President b.lae view@gmail.comm 593-5309 Kristina Schotzinger Vice President kristina.caritonlakes@gmaii.com 330-328-5428 Betty Kampfer Secretary bakampfer@hotmall.com Bruce Mousa Treasurer brusara@aol.com 614-361-4418 Alex Bautsch Director alex.bauatsch@gmail.com 431-0582 Rick Tierney Director rtier55@gmail.com 515-208-1471 r COMMUNICATION COMMITTEE Robert Strutzel r.strutzel@att.net Debbie Littman, Liaison deb.lakeview@gmail.com Charlotte Mayne maynec@aol.com ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW COMMITTEE caritonlakesarc@gmall.com Mike Campanella, Chairman Donna Mousa Linda Donaldson Jim Warner Mario Cardamone Debbie Littman, Liaison LAKES COMMITTEE cilakes.master@gmaii.com WEBSITE carltonlakesmasterassociation.frontsteps.com I PROPERTY MANAGER lzzy Ludwick on site 8-10 am M-W-F & 2-4pmT-Th 239-498-3311 izzy.l u dwick@g u Ifbreezemanageme nt.co m 2021 MASTER ARC MEETING August 2, 1:00 PM Carlton Lakes Clubhouse and via Zoom CARLTON LAKES MASTER ASSOCIATION BOARD MEETING September 14, 6:30 PM Vehicle Tags Saturday August 14 10am-2pm South Gate $40 for renters or replacement tags Contents Back to School p 15 Craft Fair p 13 Fees p 3 Kiosk p 13 Lakes pp 7-10 Landscape pp 4-6 Pet Tips p 12 Repaving Project p 11 Recycling p 16 Services pp 17-18 Tennis p 14 WHY DO I PAY TWO MANAGEMENT FEES!!! WHAT GIVES? Ofttimes newcomers to the Carlton Lakes community have confusion re the quarterly membership fees. Why are there two fees? Each Carlton Lakes condo/villa/home is located within a neighborhood association. The entirety of neighborhood associations is within the Carlton Lakes Master Association. Our neighborhood associations are comprised of two types - condo associations (COA) and homeowners' associations (HOA). The definition of whether a community is a COA vs a HOA is driven by common ownership documents as well as determination within Florida statutes. A neighborhood association's responsibilities would include local com- mon areas such as local landscaping, insurance on condos, condo buildings/roofs, car- ports, local pool maintenance, etc. Carlton Lakes Master Association is the master homeowners' association and includes every owner in Carlton Lakes regardless of type of dwelling or neighborhood association. The master association fee covers our clubhouse maintenance, recreational amenities such as the swimming pool at the clubhouse, tennis and bocce courts as well as the play- ground. It also includes paving of all streets, preservation and lake management, land- scaping in all master areas such as along Carlton Lakes Boulevard, the entry gates maintenance and other overall community common needs. Both neighborhood associations and Carlton Lakes have boards of directors (BOD) who are independent on each other. Neighborhood association boards annually determine the fees based on the specific neighborhood association's needs. The master board of direc- tors each year determines the master fees based upon the costs to operate all of master amenities i.e., insurance, landscaping, gate maintenance, etc. Additionally, both neighborhood associations and the Carlton Lakes Master are mandated by Florida to set aside monies each year for reserves. In neighborhood associations, re- serves would be set aside for such items as carports , roof replacement, painting of condo buildings, reserves for local pools, etc. The Carlton Lakes Master fee includes reserves for items such as clubhouse/gatehouse roof replacement, painting, pool heaters and furniture, pavement, fences, recreational, etc. All fees are due on a quarterly basis. Therefore, a homeowner would pay one fee to their neighborhood association and a second fee to the master. Enjoy August — stay cool and don't hesitate to contact any member of the Master Board if you have concerns re the master association. Contact your local board for local con- cerns. Vice President 330-328-5428 A Better Landscape Using Less Water Proper irrigation is often the key to a healthy, attractive lawn and landscape. In Carltor Lakes, irrigation water comes from the local lakes (retention ponds) and the amount used annually is monitored and governed by South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD). Currently, Carlton Lakes' water usage is under the annual SFWMD alloca- tion. The Lakes Committee has done a good job in monitoring the local usage and in- forming local associations when usage is above their established allocation. But we all can do more to understand and use irrigation water more efficiently. Irrigation Control Generally, irrigation is provided through an in -ground, automated sprinkler system. However, the improper operation of automatic irrigation systems can waste water, re- duce fertilizer longevity and promote disease incidence when too much water is applied. The automatic systems common in Carlton Lakes, typically are composed of a controller and an irrigation shut-off device (a rain sensor or a soil -moisture sensor) and is operated on a fixed schedule. The controller, the "brain" of the irrigation system tells the system when to come on and how long to run. Newer controllers are usually easy to set. The settings are typically done by the irrigation vendor to ensure that runs are equitable for all areas and zones. What is an Irrigation Zone? An automatic, underground irrigation system typically waters the landscape in small, separate areas called "zones." The water to each irrigation zone goes through its own electrically operated valve. A buried signal wire runs from the irrigation controller to each valve. What Days to Water SFWMD, Collier County and local Carlton Lakes' guidelines dictate which day(s) of the week you are allowed to water and how often during the week. Currently, irrigation is permitted two days a week and can be run any day except for Friday. Your local irriga- tion may run for different zones on different days of the week as long as no zones are run more than two days. During periods of new plantings, zones can be set to run more often for a limited period of time. Hand watering is a great method to ensure new plant- ings have adequate water and not overuse the irrigation system. What Time to Begin The best time to irrigate is in the early morning hours, from 4 a.m. until 8 a.m. Sunlight and wind evaporate less water during these hours, so the efficiency of irrigation is in- creased. Since most Carlton Lakes' systems need to run more than 4 hours day, the next best time for irrigation is during the night. How Long Each Zone Should Run The controller should run the system long enough to put 1/2 to 3/4 inches of wa- ter in each zone. Each irrigation zone's "run time" should be determined by the number of homes or units in the community and how long the irrigation system needs to run to meet the minimum amount of water needed. Some zones will re- quire a different amount of time to run depending on the type of heads. Spray - type heads require about one-fourth the amount of time compared to rotor -type heads. Controller settings are in minutes, not inches of water. So how do you figure out how long to run the system to get each zone the appropriate amount of water? To calculate how long to run the system to get each zone the appropriate amount of water, the system must be calibrated, zone by zone. Irrigation Rain Sensors Irrigation shut-off devices, either rain sensors or soil -moisture sensors, are re- quired by Florida law on all irrigation systems. Use of a rain sensor is more com- mon than soil -moisture sensors in Carlton Lakes. The rain sensor should be po- sitioned on the roof or rain gutter with open sky above it. It is wired into the con- troller and will interrupt scheduled irrigation if sufficient rain falls. It will also keep the system turned off for a preset "dry down" time in which no irrigation is applied. Rain sensors should be set to stop operation after 0.25 inches of rain has fallen. Then the "dry down" operation must be fully open to prevent the system coming on again quickly. The "dry down" time is how long the system stays off once the rain sensor has interrupted irrigation. Irrigation vendors should make sure the sensor is operating properly by checking it every month during the monthly wet check. A simple method for checking is to pour or spray a small amount of water over the rain sensor while the irrigation system is operating. Irrigation in all zones should stop soon thereafter and re- main off until the dry down period has passed. Irrigation vendors should also be completing a seasonal adjustment on rain sensors here in SWFL. Seasonal irri- gation adjusts was a topic of a July Lakes Committee article and can be refer- enced for more information. Summary Irrigation in Carlton Lakes is handled by the specific irrigation vendor for each lo- cal community. Local boards should work with the vendor to ensure the irrigation system is working correctly and the established water usage allocation is main- tained. Local associations can use this and other information from periodic news- letter articles to have conversations with their irrigation vendor. More information and guidelines on irrigation is available in the Carlton Lakes Master Association Rules and Regulations. FM_ The technology for irrigation systems has changed over the past years. Newer irri- gation heads and up to date controller systems can help to reduce the water us- age, but still keep the appropriate water coming to the landscape and sod areas. Ask the vendor in your community to provide an audit of your system to determine where savings can be made. Be wise users of this valuable resource. Adapted from OF-IFAS Extension Service Information Irrigation at Ground Level Typical Spray Head Typical Rain Sensor Vwm i tm4a, Liaison Lakes Committee 1.1 With Summer Comes Rain and More Rain As we once again move into Southwest Florida's summer / hurricane season, I feel it is a good idea to remind everyone how our lakes work to keep our homes from flooding. We typically consider our lakes as part of the landscaping, beautify our community or so the builder could in- crease the selling price of a unit with a "Lake View". In reality, they provide a far more important function, es- pecially during a major rain event. First and foremost, working in conjunction with the Co- cohatchee Canal, they pro- vide flood protection. For example, during Irma in 2017, our lakes and the ca- nal per wonderfully and protected homes from flooding. Our homes are built up to approximately 15 feet above sea level, while our lakes have a control level of 11.5 feet. This pro- intended to vides us with a 3.5-foot buffer. In addition, once the lakes reach their control level, the water begins to exit the community and into the Cocohatchee canal via the out- flow weir located in the south leg of lake 2. This allows the storm water to rapidly flow from the community, reducing the flood potential. During Irma, some associations did experience street flooding, as the picture above shows, but fortunately, we received no reports of major water damage from ground water. We believe that much of the street flooding was caused by the ex- tremely heavy rain fall during the hurricane, coupled with the storm sewers filling with storm debris such as sticks, leaves and loose plant material. I would like to note that the Lakes Committee has the sewers inspected periodically and after any major rain event (such as Irma), cleaned to ensure water flows freely into our lakes. Our lakes are under the control of a Florida State government agency, the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD). Carlton Lakes is also part of the Cocohatchee Basin watershed. The map on the left shows we (Carlton Lakes) are located at the Southwest corner of the Cocohatchee River Canal Basin. As part of the watershed, our lakes are impacted by the ground water from the basin and the Cocohatchee Canal. When lake levels are below their control level of 11.5 feet, the ground water moves quite freely between the canal and our lakes, through our Our lakes are under the control we F of a Florida State government s; f agency, the South Florida s Water Management District (SFWMD). Carlton Lakes is also part of the Cocohatchee Basin watershed. The map on H" roa • the left shows we (Carlton FPt vivo Wf Lakes) are located at the r ncona[rr'uy'' cn.[ Rnr+.enef so'" pamr" �M a„„ v.•. Southwest corner of the Coco- 4V ft. hatchee River Canal Basin. As part of the watershed, our lakes are impacted by the ground 6t[ri1 Mpk, Pyi 4-P water from the basin and the Cocohatchee Canal. When lake levels are below their control level of 11.5 feet, the ground water moves quite freely between the canal and our lakes, through our porous (sandy) soil. SFWMD can and does affect the levels of our lakes by changing the level of the canal beside our property (along Immokalee Road), which is the Cocohatchee canal. Therefore, storm water flowing into our lakes is removed by both the overflow and through ground water flow. SFWMD manages the ground water flow from the Cocohatchee Basin and our lake levels, by opening the canal weir gates along Immokalee Road (picture on the left). By draining water from the basin and our lakes it helps prevent flooding. To illustrate this, the canal was lowered to 6.5 feet from its typical level of 10 feet just before Irma. This pulled water out of our lakes, lowering them. When Irma hit Naples on Sept 10, the canal level rose to 10 feet, more than a 3-foot change in 1 day, our lake levels also rose to over 11.5 feet and water was flowing through our overflow. By keeping water flowing from the canal, the level dropped and by Sept 27 our lakes returned to their typical levels of about 10 feet. Collier County / SFWMD takes its responsibility of preventing flooding seriously, especially in North Naples. The picture below was taken September 26, 2017. It shows the last weir on the Cocohatchee Canal (CoCo1), the weir just before the canal joins the Palm River Canal and flows into the Estuary at Delnor-Wiggins State Park. The large pipes on the right side of the picture are connected to ex- ceptionally large water pumps. These pumps were erected before Irma to draw water from the canal, increasing the flow of water out of the Cocohatchee Canal (basin), helping prevent storm water from backing up in the canal. Without these, it could have caused water problems for many communities, including Carlton Lakes. Storm Preparations Encouraged to Help Prevent Roadway Flooding As Hurricane season develops, Collier County Road Maintenance Division crews are preparing for heavy rain and encouraging all Collier County proper- ty owners to prepare as well. Property owners should make sure all storm - water inlet drains, grates and swales on their own property are clear of all ob- structions including toys, leaves, branches and debris. Collier County Road Maintenance Division crews are working to clear county maintained roadside swales and drainage inlets to mitigate any potential flooding. They also are monitoring weir levels and preparing heavy equip- ment for mobilization so it can be placed around the county and be ready for use in debris removal once the storm passes. Crews continue to monitor the storm. Important reminders during flooding: • Never walk or drive in the flood waters. Many people are killed by driving or walking on roads and bridges that are covered by water. Even though the water might look only inches deep, it could be much deeper and have strong currents. It takes only two feet of water to carry a car away, and only six inches of swiftly moving water to sweep a person off their feet. 9 Find an alternate route around the flooded area. If you are approaching a flooded roadway, turn around and take an alternate route, even though vehicles in front of you may have passed through the high water. • Don't assume your vehicle is safe. High water in streets and intersections will quickly stall motor vehicles. Most trucks, four-wheel drives and sport utility vehicles are suscep- tible to being swept away by high water. • Never stay with your car in a flooded area. If your car stalls, abandon it immediately and climb to higher ground. Many deaths have resulted from individuals attempting to move stalled vehicles. • Never let children play near canals or storm drains when the water is rising or high. Swimming skills have nothing to do with surviving a flooded creek or stream. Flood time is not a time for play. Keep children out of flooded areas. To report serious road flooding issues, please contact the Collier County Road Mainte- nance Division at (239) 252-8924. How to contact us: Send your questions and comments via email to: cllakes. master(a)gmail. com Lakes Committee Liaison 10 CARLTON LAKES REPAVING PROJECT WHAT COMES NEXT: Ashwood Lane: The second and final layer (lift) of asphalt is scheduled for Tuesday, 8/3. Residents may want to hold trash for the Friday pickup. Highwood Court: The street will receive one layer of asphalt on Monday 8/2. Highwood Park Lane full depth milling and one layer (lift) of asphalt are com- plete. The second and final layer (lift) of asphalt is scheduled for Wednesday. 8/4. Manchester Place: The second and final layer (lift) of asphalt is scheduled for Monday, 8/2. Carlton Lakes Boulevard is scheduled for milling crossovers on Thursday and Friday, 8/5 and 8/6, with a first layer (lift) of asphalt the same days. Any personal work requiring large vehicles such as moving vans, landscape trucks, delivery trucks or dump trucks should be rescheduled to a future date. WHAT TO EXPECT: A gooey layer of tar is placed on the road surface before the final layer of asphalt is placed. Avoid driving on the tar if at all possible. Traffic delays Dust Vibrations associated with compaction of the streets may be felt in some residenc- es. These vibrations are not at the level that would be associated with damage to structures. Staining and discoloration on the surface of the newly placed asphalt should be expected. It is common for the roller used to compact the asphalt to track sand or other material from the base course onto the surface. This can stain the surface of the asphalt. These stains are considered cosmetic as the structural integrity of the asphalt is not affected. This should fade over time with normal traffic and as the asphalt cures. Ve2'e .C'arar4a, President 11 SUMMER PET TIPS Summer is here! Don't let your pup fall victim to the heat. Here are some quick tips to keep your pup safe and happy all summer long! Thanks to the ASPCA for these great tips! Know the symptoms of overheating in pets, which include excessive panting or difficulty breathing, increased heart and respiratory rate, drooling, mild weakness, stupor or even collapse. Symptoms can also include seizures, bloody diarrhea and vomit along with an elevated body temperature of over 104 degrees. Animals with flat faces, like pugs and Persian cats, are more susceptible to heat stroke since they cannot pant as effectively. These pets, along with the elderly, the overweight, and those with heart or lung diseases, should be kept cool in air-conditioned rooms as much as possible. Never leave your animals alone in a parked vehicle. Not only can it lead to fatal heat stroke, it is illegal in several states! Do not leave pets unsupervised around a pool — not all dogs are good swim- mers. Introduce your pets to water gradually and make sure they wear flotation devices when on boats. Rinse your dog off after swimming to re- move chlorine or salt from his/her fur and try to keep your dog from drink- ing pool water, which contains chlorine and other chemicals. Note: all association pools are off limits to pets. When the temperature is very high, don't let your dog linger on hot as- phalt. Being so close to the ground, your pooch's body can heat up quick- ly, and sensitive paw pads can burn. Keep walks during these times to a minimum. Commonly used rodenticides and lawn and garden insecticides can be harm- ful to cats and dogs if ingested, so keep them out of reach. Keep citronel- la candles, tiki torch products and insect coils out of pets' reach as well. Call your veterinarian or the ASPCA Animal Poison Control Center at 888-426-4435 if you suspect your animal has ingested a poisonous sub- stance. 12 II■I■I■I■I■I■I■I■I■I■I■I■I■I■I■I■I■I■I■I■I■I■I■I■li� CARLTON LAKES CRAFT FAIR Are you ready for some shopping? The Carlton Lakes Craft Fair is on track for Saturday November 13th. All six foot tables have been taken, but there is room to accommodate a few more crafters. Contact Natalie Duff nduff03(a)gmaiI.com if you have handcrafted items that you would like to show and sell. We will be up and running with covid protocols, if necessary, just as we were in 2020. Please be careful when approaching the kiosk. Remind all guests and vendors to do the same. Remember the old saying, "you broke it, you bought it!" 13 TENNIS ETIQUETTE Carlton Lakes tennis rules go hand in hand with correct tennis etiquette to allow for both safe play and an enjoyable experience for all. Both rules and etiquette must be followed in order to play on the courts and both are enforced. The tennis rules are posted at the kiosk adjacent to courts 3 and 4 and these rules pertain to all Carlton Lakes residents as well as their guests. Let me provide a brief overview. A sign-up sheet is in the kiosk for residents who wish to reserve a court for play. Reserva- tions can be made for a specific day and time of the day in 1 1/2 hour segments. Reserva- tions can be made for no more than one week in advance and only one court can be reserved at a time and in the times posted on the sheets. If the person who reserved a court does not arrive on time, the reservation is voided after 15 minutes. Proper attire is required to play on the courts. This means that only tennis shoes can be worn on the courts. Shirts are required to be worn at all times. Needless to say, crude language, swearing and loud yelling while people are playing is poor tennis etiquette and is not tolerated. Trash bins are provided on each court. Please take all used items with you when leaving or place them in the trash bins. This includes tennis balls that may be hit into the lake or the preserves and recovered. Please enjoy the tennis courts and permit others to do the same with proper etiquette. Vincent Baiera, Tennis Committee Chair 14 Take Advantage of Future Ready Collier's Back -to -School Toolkits 4- It is Future Ready Collier's goal is to ensure all children are ready for the next step in education, whether it's at- tending Kindergarten to heading off to college. The Future Ready Collier network partners compiled a resource kit to help families be prepared for those next steps. Visit futurereadycollier.org/family-resources to download the kindergarten or college toolkits. We're helping Florida families cut costs while stocking up for school supplies. This year the Florida Legislature extended the tax holiday by 3 days for a 10-day tax holiday. Beginning, July 31 and running through August 9, Florida families can save on eligible school supplies during Florida's Back -to -School Sales Tax Holiday. Eligible items that consumers can purchase tax-free include: Clothing, footwear and backpacks costing $60 or less; School supplies costing $15 or less; and The first $1,000 of the sales tax price of personal computers or personal comput- er -related accessories. You may learn more about the tax holiday at FloridaRevenue.com/BacktoSchool. Remember to shop local while preparing for the new school year. With school starting soon, please be careful of children walking to the bus stops at the Clubhouse and the Highwood Park Lane intersection. These are the only approved bus stops in Carlton Lakes. For those parents who drive their children to the Clubhouse to wait for the bus, please park in the Clubhouse parking lot. Do not stop on Carlton Lakes Boulevard or the driveway. Do not block the Highwood Park intersection. We are in the minority of communities that permit school buses to enter the community. State law says a child can walk 1.2 miles to a bus stop. The distance in our community from most residences is around '/2 mile or less. READY, SET,, LE - RN 15 + % Ca 7 o / &mow0§\ 0 0 a)2 X -0 qQ iz- � 2 Ca n x dq (D 2�70 @ a = ° -- © CZ% © � w� k & $ ■ t/rn �o ® a m CD \ \ ■ Q %�% q ■ , m # > 0 3 m /(Dk @ ( £ /C, / 0 / CD CL 0C �� - % f 3 ¢ K_ k \ ® 2 m w ■ } ---ow CD �rn CD CD LM to k % 0 rj� $ Cn� s� TF-. : 40 ■ ■ wo qftb � �'�■ a \ .. i ¥ SALES & SERVICES Coconut BAM Productions Website & Graphic Designs Interested in a new website or fine tuning your existing site? Looking for custom graphic designs? For affordable and thoughtful service, contact Beth A. Maxwell. Coconut BAM Productions Cal! (239) 514-2522 Email Beth@BethAMaxwell.com Visit BethAMaxwell.com HOME WATCH Cynthia Wychocki cwychoc kita&-gmail.com 219-730-2704 Need a Helping Hand? Personal Assistant Services to Seniors Muriel Canzone Call: 239-272-3025 Email: murielcanzone@gmail.com Licensed -insured -Bonded Home Watch "Treating your home like it is my own" Natalie Duff nduff03(a)-gmail.com 239-216-1628 0 L RENEE MARINO Balance, .Str enght, Fr tne", Mobility and I Stamina Coach m f er wlerizon. not Ucznied A Lnwmd NS A -CPT- NPTI-Wddthaxm.MA Continued next page 17 Joe Gonzales �4Y1r: SKvng Naples 9 Bonita Springs O.N LIle Home & Car WAtclr 'Avwx* xmna A aKrhoW C ITM239-362,91e1e Fr"Co Wlalion:239.362 9108 EMA. tom bWrd L BOOM Mneorr WAMdWW HM WOO Allwna fiRA1lUArt � For Sm m Mrred aw F rrr lops ■nr wm &e d &tames ereatia" Cheryl.CustomCreations@gmail.com 404-242-1394 Reupholster Clothing Alterations Custom cushions, curtains, pillows, and more Home Electronics Install & Setup TV's, DVD players, Sound Bars, TV Streaming Devices Wifi Smart Home Devices includin Sonos, Thermostats. Doorbells, Security Systems & Cameras. Amazon Alexa. etc Rick Tierney 515-208-1471 rtier55(5-)gmail.com 18 - - }'H,4* �- J � CU cc � G -0 CO J _ �� az Wcj ,. -. tm CO 15 Q, AW T11. r .� i A�, _ O�G t if IV = o Ls o aJ CL as i