Loading...
CCPC Agenda 09/16/2021 Collier County Planning Commission Page 1 Printed 9/9/2021 COLLIER COUNTY Collier County Planning Commission AGENDA Board of County Commission Chambers Collier County Government Center 3299 Tamiami Trail East, 3rd Floor Naples, FL 34112 September 16, 2021 9: 00 AM Edwin Fryer- Chairman Karen Homiak - Vice-Chair Karl Fry- Secretary Christopher Vernon Paul Shea, Environmental Joseph Schmitt, Environmental Robert Klucik, Jr. Thomas Eastman, Collier County School Board Note: Individual speakers will be limited to 5 minutes on any item. Individuals selected to speak on behalf of an organization or group are encouraged and may be allotted 10 minutes to speak on an item if so recognized by the chairman. Persons wishing to have written or graphic materials included in the CCPC agenda packets must submit said material a minimum of 10 days prior to the respective public hearing. In any case, written materials intended to be considered by the CCPC shall be submitted to the appropriate county staff a minimum of seven days prior to the public hearing. All material used in presentations before the CCPC will become a permanent part of the record and will be available for presentation to the Board of County Commissioners if applicable. Any person who decides to appeal a decision of the CCPC will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto, and therefore may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. September 2021 Collier County Planning Commission Page 2 Printed 9/9/2021 1. Pledge of Allegiance 2. Roll Call by Secretary 3. Addenda to the Agenda 4. Planning Commission Absences 5. Approval of Minutes A. August 19, 2021 CCPC Meeting Minutes 6. BCC Report - Recaps 7. Chairman's Report 8. Consent Agenda 9. Public Hearings A. Advertised 1. PL20200001827 PUDZ RCMA Immokalee - An Ordinance of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida amending Ordinance Number 2004-41, as amended, the Collier County Land Development Code, which established the comprehensive zoning regulations for the unincorporated area of Collier County, Florida, by amending the appropriate zoning atlas map or maps by changing the zoning classification of the herein described real property from a Rural Agricultural (A) Zoning District within the Immokalee Area Overlay and the Wellfield Risk Management Special Treatment Overlay Zones W-1 through W-4 to a Mixed-Use Planned Unit Development (MPUD) Zoning District within the Immokalee Area Overlay and the Wellfield Risk Management Special Treatment Overlay Zones W-1 through W-4 for the project to be known as RCMA Immokalee MPUD, to allow construction of a 250 student childcare center (pre-school), 700 student school, community center and a maximum of 160 multi-family residential dwelling units on property located at the northwest quadrant of Lake Trafford Road and Carson Road, in Section 31, Township 46 South, Range 29 East, consisting of 62.22± acres; and by providing an effective date. [Coordinator: Timothy Finn, AICP, Principal Planner] September 2021 Collier County Planning Commission Page 3 Printed 9/9/2021 2. PL20210000731 PUDA Community School of Naples - An Ordinance of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida amending Ordinance Number 12-05, the Community School of Naples Community Facility Planned Unit Development (CFPUD) to add acreage and relocate; by amending Ordinance Number 2004-41, the Collier County Land Development Code, by amending the appropriate zoning atlas map or maps by changing the zoning classification of an additional 3.95± acres of land zoned Residential Single Family-3 (RSF-3) to the Community School of Naples CFPUD; by revising the development standards; by amending the master plan and revising developer commitments. The property is located on the west side of Livingston Road and north of Pine Ridge Road in Section 12, Township 49 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida consisting of 77± acres; and by providing an effective date. [Coordinator: Timothy Finn, AICP, Principal Planner] 3. PL20190002849 GMPA -Creekside Subdistrict - An Ordinance of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida amending Ordinance No. 89-05, as amended, the Collier County Growth Management Plan for the unincorporated area of Collier County, Florida, specifically amending the Future Land Use Element and Future Land Use Map and Map Series to create the Creekside Commerce Park East Mixed-Use Subdistrict by changing the designation of property from Urban- Mixed Use District, Urban Residential Subdistrict to Urban-Mixed Use District, Creekside Commerce Park East Mixed-Use Subdistrict to allow 300 multi-family rental dwelling units in addition to non-residential uses. The subject property is located in the southeast quadrant of the intersection of Immokalee Road and Goodlette Frank Road in Section 27, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, consisting of 9.9± acres; and furthermore, directing transmittal of the adopted amendment to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity; providing for severability and providing for an effective date. (Companion Item PL20190002850 PUDA) [Coordinator: Sue Faulkner, Principal Planner] 4. PL20190002850 PUDA Creekside Commerce Park - An Ordinance of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida amending Ordinance Number 2006-50, the Creekside Commerce Park Commercial Planned Unit Development (CPUD), as amended, by adding up to 300 multi-family rental dwelling units as a permitted use in the business district; adding residential development standards including a maximum height of 100 feet; and by amending the master plan. The subject multi-family property is in the southeast quadrant of the intersection of Immokalee Road and Goodlette Frank Road, consisting of 28.85± acres and the CPUD is located south of Immokalee Road and both east and west of Goodlette Frank Road in Section 27, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida; and by providing an effective date. (Companion Item PL20190002849 GMPA) [Coordinator: Nancy Gundlach, AICP, PLA, Principal Planner] September 2021 Collier County Planning Commission Page 4 Printed 9/9/2021 5. PL20190001333 GMPA Iglesias Pentecostes Peniel - An Ordinance of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida amending Ordinance No. 89-05, as amended, the Collier County Growth Management Plan for the unincorporated area of Collier County, Florida, specifically amending the Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan Element and Rural Golden Gate Estates Future Land Use Map and Map Series; by amending the Estates-Mixed Use District to add the 8th Street NE-22nd Avenue NE Subdistrict to allow a 100-seat church as a conditional use. The subject property consists of 5.15± acres and is located on the northwest corner of 8th Street NE and 22nd Avenue NE in Section 27, Township 48 South, Range 27 East, Collier County, Florida; and furthermore, directing transmittal of the adopted amendment to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity; providing for severability and providing for an effective date. (Companion Item PL20190001326 CU) [Coordinator: Sue Faulkner, Principal Planner] 6. PL20190001326 CU Iglesias Pentecostes Peniel - A resolution of the Board of Zoning Appeals of Collier County, Florida providing for the establishment of a conditional use to allow a 100-seat church within an Estates (E) zoning district pursuant to Section 2.03.01.B.1.c.1 of the Collier County Land Development Code for a +/-5.15 acre property located on the northwest corner of 8th Street NE and 22nd Avenue NE in Section 27, Township 48 South, Range 27 East, Collier County, Florida. (Companion Item PL20190001333 GMPA) [Coordinator: Ray Bellows, AICP, Zoning Manager] B. Noticed 10. Old Business 11. New Business 12. Public Comment 13. Adjourn 09/16/2021 COLLIER COUNTY Collier County Planning Commission Item Number: 5.A Item Summary: August 19, 2021 CCPC Meeting Minutes Meeting Date: 09/16/2021 Prepared by: Title: Operations Analyst – Planning Commission Name: Diane Lynch 09/03/2021 2:18 PM Submitted by: Title: – Zoning Name: Mike Bosi 09/03/2021 2:18 PM Approved By: Review: Planning Commission Diane Lynch Review item Completed 09/03/2021 2:18 PM Zoning Mike Bosi Zoning Director Review Completed 09/03/2021 4:39 PM Growth Management Operations & Regulatory Management Donna Guitard Review Item Completed 09/07/2021 9:03 AM Growth Management Department James C French GMD Deputy Dept Head Completed 09/07/2021 10:30 AM Planning Commission Edwin Fryer Meeting Pending 09/16/2021 9:00 AM 5.A Packet Pg. 5 August 19, 2021 Page 1 of 72 TRANSCRIPT OF THE MEETING OF THE COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION Naples, Florida August 19, 2021 LET IT BE REMEMBERED, that the Collier County Planning Commission, in and for the County of Collier, having conducted business herein, met on this date at 9:00 a.m., in REGULAR SESSION in Building "F" of the Government Complex, East Naples, Florida, with the following members present: Edwin Fryer, Chairman Karen Homiak, Vice Chair Karl Fry Joe Schmitt Paul Shea Robert L. Klucik, Jr. Christopher T. Vernon Tom Eastman, Collier County School Board Representative ALSO PRESENT: Raymond V. Bellows, Zoning Manager Michael Bosi, Planning and Zoning Director Jeffrey Klatzkow, County Attorney Heidi Ashton-Cicko, Managing Assistant County Attorney 5.A.a Packet Pg. 6 Attachment: 08-19-21CCPC Meeting Minutes - Formatted pdf (19978 : August 19, 2021 CCPC Meeting Minutes) August 19, 2021 Page 2 of 72 P R O C E E D I N G S CHAIRMAN FRYER: Good morning. This is the August 19, 2021, meeting of the Collier County Planning Commission. Will everyone please rise for the Pledge of Allegiance. (The Pledge of Allegiance was recited in unison.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: Will the secretary please call the roll. COMMISSIONER FRY: Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Mr. Eastman. MR. EASTMAN: Here. COMMISSIONER FRY: Mr. Shea. COMMISSIONER SHEA: Here. COMMISSIONER FRY: I'm here. Chairman Fryer. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Here. COMMISSIONER FRY: Vice Chair Homiak. COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: Here. COMMISSIONER FRY: Mr. Schmitt. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Here. COMMISSIONER FRY: Mr. Vernon. COMMISSIONER VERNON: Here. COMMISSIONER FRY: Mr. Klucik. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Here. COMMISSIONER FRY: Mr. Chairman, we have a quorum of seven. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you very much. Welcome all, and a special welcome to our esteemed colleagues who have graduated to the dais. We're very proud to be sitting alongside you, and we -- we are already functioning in a very close fashion, and now we're physically close, too. So that's great. Welcome all. First of all, on addenda to the agenda we had had something that has been canceled, and that is that we received -- we'd all received an e-mail from Judith Hushon on behalf of the League of Women Voters who wanted to allow an expert witness to testify out of order in order to accommodate his teaching schedule. Just since we all got that e-mail, I wanted to report back to you that as of yesterday evening when she called me, that request has been withdrawn. Mr. Bellows, any other addenda to the agenda? MR. BELLOWS: No other changes. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you, sir. Planning Commission absences. Our next meeting is September 2, 2021. Anyone know if they will not be able to be here? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: Sounds good. And the one after that is the 16th. Same question. (No response.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: All right. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Sixteenth of October? CHAIRMAN FRYER: Of September. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Oh, I'll be here. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Good, good. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Jumping ahead a month. COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: Where you going; Kabul? COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Yeah, I'm going to Kabul. Been there enough. I could talk about that for the next hour. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Yeah. It's terrible what's going on there. All right. We've got three sets of minutes to act upon. The first set is those of our 5.A.a Packet Pg. 7 Attachment: 08-19-21CCPC Meeting Minutes - Formatted pdf (19978 : August 19, 2021 CCPC Meeting Minutes) August 19, 2021 Page 3 of 72 May 26th meeting. Any corrections, changes, or additions to those minutes? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: Hearing none, is there a motion to approve them as submitted? COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: Motion to approve. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Is there a second? COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Second. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Further discussion? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: If not, all those -- if not, all those -- if not, all those in favor, please say aye. COMMISSIONER SHEA: Aye. COMMISSIONER FRY: Aye. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Aye. COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: Aye. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Aye. COMMISSIONER VERNON: Aye. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Aye. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Opposed? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: It passed unanimously. Second, our meeting of June 3rd. Those minutes are also before you, June 3rd of 2021. Again, any corrections, changes, or additions to those? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: Hearing none, is there a motion? COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: Motion to approve. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Is there a second? COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Second. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Any further discussion? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: If not, all those in favor, please say aye. COMMISSIONER SHEA: Aye. COMMISSIONER FRY: Aye. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Aye. COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: Aye. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Aye. COMMISSIONER VERNON: Aye. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Aye. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Opposed? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: It passed unanimously. And third and last, our minutes of the June 17, 2021, meeting. Again, any corrections, changes, or additions to those minutes? COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: Motion to approve. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Is there a second? COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Second. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Any further discussion? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: If not, all those in favor, please say aye. COMMISSIONER SHEA: Aye. COMMISSIONER FRY: Aye. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Aye. 5.A.a Packet Pg. 8 Attachment: 08-19-21CCPC Meeting Minutes - Formatted pdf (19978 : August 19, 2021 CCPC Meeting Minutes) August 19, 2021 Page 4 of 72 COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: Aye. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Aye. COMMISSIONER VERNON: Aye. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Aye. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Opposed? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: It passed unanimously. All right. BCC report and recaps. Mr. Bellows. MR. BELLOWS: On July 13th, the Board of County Commissioners approved the RLSA adoption at their advertised public hearing, and on the summary agenda they approved the Lawmetka PUD amendment and the Blue Coral Apartments rezone and companion GMP amendments, and there were some LDC amendments that were approved, various LDC amendments. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you, sir. Chairman's report, none today. Consent agenda, there's none on our agenda under that heading. So we come to advertised public hearings, and the first one is matter No. PL2021000093, which is a proposed GMPA amendment regarding private property rights -- excuse me. My notes are wrong. My notes are wrong. MR. YOVANOVICH: I'll sit back down. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Let me correct myself here quickly, if I can. Here we are, okay. ***This is -- all right. It's the same number, PL2021000093, and it is the -- yeah, it is the Soluna RPUDZ. So we need to ask around if -- first of all, if are there any people who wish to testify in this matter, please rise to be sworn in by the court reporter. (The speakers were duly sworn and indicated in the affirmative.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you. Disclosures from the Planning Commission starting with Mr. Eastman. MR. EASTMAN: No disclosures. COMMISSIONER SHEA: Staff material and site visit. COMMISSIONER FRY: Staff materials, e-mails, public record. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Staff materials, meeting with staff, communications with the applicant, and communications with members of the public. COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: I just exchanged e-mails with the petitioner. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: I had communications with Mr. Yovanovich and the applicant about the project. COMMISSIONER VERNON: No disclosures. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you. COMMISSIONER SHEA: Robb. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Staff material and a staff meeting. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you. Thank you. It's going to take me a while getting used to having all eight of us up here, but I promise to do so. Mr. Yovanovich, I'm going to ask you to rise if you would, please, sir, and I'm going to suggest that we have a conversation about a technical matter to precede the hearing that follows conversations I've had with the County Attorney and also staff. There may or may not be some action that the Planning Commission wishes to take with respect to this before it's started. And I'm going to certainly ask Mr. Yovanovich to present his point of view on this, and I'm also going to ask the County Attorney to supplement what I intend to give as a brief presentation of what this issue has turned out to be. The issue is the adequacy of the NIM audiotape. And I don't know whether anybody or everyone listened to that. I always do. I find it useful for a number of reasons: Listening, of course, for any commitments that an applicant might make but also for the tenor and content of the 5.A.a Packet Pg. 9 Attachment: 08-19-21CCPC Meeting Minutes - Formatted pdf (19978 : August 19, 2021 CCPC Meeting Minutes) August 19, 2021 Page 5 of 72 questions and comments that are supplied by the staff. The problem, in a nutshell, with this NIM audible -- audiotape is that it was almost nearly inaudible, at least from the standpoint of hearing members of the public. The applicant is to be heard crystal clear, and it's understanding that they used one microphone, and that was in the hands of the applicant. So to the extent at all that you can even hear remote noise from the members of the public, it's through that single microphone. So in order to try to fix that situation so that we wouldn't have to have this discussion and possible action, we asked our own Mr. Troy Miller, who's our chief engineer, to try to somehow electronically augment or boost the signal, the output, so that the public could also be heard. And he made diligent efforts, which we certainly appreciate but, unfortunately, he was not able to gain any improvement at all due to the fact that distortion or noise also gets boosted along with signal. In addition to inaudibility, at least with respect to the public, is the issue that the tape has still not been posted to CityView, so it's not available to the public. And when I wanted to go back and hear the public comments or the applicant's presentation, I can always refer to CityView and hear it firsthand, even if there's a transcript, because it's posted there. Some -- well, let me first say this just to make it perfectly clear: I'm not calling out anybody for any wrongdoing or any ill intentions. This is at most an honest inadvertence, and it's something that I think should and will be viewed by the Planning Commission in that light. And, in fact, to say Mr. Yovanovich, he hadn't even been engaged before this -- the NIM was held, so he's in no way responsible for it. He's very experienced in overseeing NIMs, and our experience with him shows that he really does deliver first-rate product, along with Mr. Mulhere and Mr. Arnold and many others who appear before us frequently. So when I was speaking with staff on Tuesday, it was brought to my attention that some years ago Chairman Strain called for another NIM under similar circumstances. Now, by way of other background, the Collier County Land Development Code Administrative Procedures Manual in Section 8(B) says that the county staff planner assigned to attend the pre-application meeting or designee must attend the NIM and will serve as the facilitator of the meeting; however, the applicant is expected to make a presentation of how they intend to develop the subject property, and the applicant is required to audio or videotape the proceedings of the meeting and to provide a copy to the Planning and Zoning Department. Now, I've also spoken with the County Attorney, and I know that he's been in touch with Mr. Yovanovich and with the staff, and I'm not going to speak for him except possibly just to short-circuit it to say that I believe he believes that this is a matter that is most appropriately acted upon by the Planning Commission whether it wishes to call for another NIM or go with the current one. And so as I see it, I think we have several options here. One would be to make a decision right now, based upon the acknowledged inaudibility of much of the NIM, that we want another NIM. That's one option. A second option, I think, to take it with the case, so to speak, and by that I mean decide on the NIM issue at the close of the hearing when we decide on the merits of the matter. And then a third thing that occurred to me as, perhaps, a way of doing this -- and I'm a little less sanguine that it would work as I see not a lot of the members of the public are here today. But I was going to suggest that it might at least partially cure the NIM problem if we were a little more tolerant of the time allocated to members of the public to be sure that they make the points without being cut off, particularly if they had attended the NIM and wanted to make those points. So that was just a potential solution that I thought of. I know that the -- that the applicant has some issues involving the tax law and possible changes where they'd like to get this done by the end of the year, and we certainly respect that it may or may not be appropriate to have another NIM and then deal with the other steps that the applicant would have to take to close, because they're contract purchasers. So the staff has said that they're following the advice of the County Attorney on this. And 5.A.a Packet Pg. 10 Attachment: 08-19-21CCPC Meeting Minutes - Formatted pdf (19978 : August 19, 2021 CCPC Meeting Minutes) August 19, 2021 Page 6 of 72 I don't want to presume to represent the views of the County Attorney. So, Mr. County Attorney, is there anything further that you'd like to add? MR. KLATZKOW: The primary purpose of a NIM is to advise the community what's going on so that notice is given to the community. There's a public place that's open. They sit down. They can ask questions of the developer after a presentation, and the developer could -- if there are any issues between the community and the development, the developer has the opportunity to amend their plans accordingly. That's the primary purpose of it. That purpose was served here. I don't know the purpose of having a second NIM. The people who are interested showed up for the first NIM. So I don't know how you cure the audio problem here. I would make a suggestion that staff in the future consider whether or not they should be responsible for recording these things. I know they don't want to because that means if it's a screw-up it's on them, but I think there's far less likely for a screw-up if our capable staff does it than to rely on developers to do it. Mr. Yovanovich is very experienced in this. Not every developer, however, has an attorney as experienced as Mr. Yovanovich. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Well, before he speaks, we would like to speak first. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Yes, and I think that's in order. Do you have anything further, County Attorney? MR. KLATZKOW: Yes. Whether or not the Board wishes to have a second NIM is entirely up to the discretion of the Planning Commission. I don't believe it's legally required, but if that's what you want, you are the Planning Commission. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you. Commissioner Schmitt. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Somebody was before me. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Yeah, two people were, actually. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: All right. I understand the problem, but let's talk about the genesis of the NIM process. I happen to have been the administrator at the time when this thing was implemented, and it involved three different aspects of notice to the public. One of the biggest problems we had, number one, we changed the requirements for the signage. In fact, in most cases you're driving 35, 40 miles an hour, you can't read the sign anyway; the second thing that was done was to improve the advertisement process, the maps that are included in the paper; and the third was the NIM. But I have to ask. You used the word "facilitator." Staff, my recollection, is not the facilitator. This is a meeting held -- scheduled, held, and conducted by the petitioner to brief the public on what the proposed rezoning is going to be. Staff is only there to ensure, number one, that the meeting is conducted and, two, is to take administrative notes on the process or note any anomalies between the NIM and, of course, the application. And in that case, the requirement has been met. The issue of recording came later in the process, and I can't recall when. I was probably long gone by then. But the recording's to be made available. The one instance where the NIM was rescheduled, I believe, had to do with erroneous or maybe misinformation being presented at the NIM. I don't think any of that took place in this case. It was a matter of the audio being available. Certainly, that's not the way -- what was supposed to be the intent when they do record these things, but it doesn't mean that there was -- it was not in compliance. The NIM was conducted. The public attended. The questions were raised. Staff, I believe, captured those questions, and staff then included and checked in the review process to ensure that the various aspects of the questions asked or any changes that were made were incorporated in the PUD. So the intent -- and the NIM was actually conducted. I'm not sure if there's even a statute to stand on to require the NIM to be rescheduled. There's nothing in the -- in the LDC that describes the quality of the audio. Maybe there should be. I don't know. But the intent was 5.A.a Packet Pg. 11 Attachment: 08-19-21CCPC Meeting Minutes - Formatted pdf (19978 : August 19, 2021 CCPC Meeting Minutes) August 19, 2021 Page 7 of 72 never to have staff be involved in the NIM process because it is not a staff petition. It is the petitioner who presents the NIM, and staff is only there, again, to ensure that the public can engage with the applicant and to review the application process and to review the petition. So that's my recollection. And I'm sure staff can certainly highlight that. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Thank you. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Commissioner Fry. MR. YOVANOVICH: May I? CHAIRMAN FRYER: Let me just test with -- I've got four commissioners here who want to be heard. Do we want to hear from Mr. Yovanovich first? MR. KLATZKOW: This is a Planning Commission discussion. You guys ought to make the decision on this. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Agreed. CHAIRMAN FRYER: All right. Well, then we'll hear from ourselves first. Commissioner Fry. COMMISSIONER FRY: So I think two questions as I see it. One is, you know, was the administrative process followed, and I think that's one question which Joe got into deeply; and the other is whether we have the information we need to do our job today. And so as -- my recollection of the packet was there was a staff summary of the NIM, there was an applicant summary of the NIM in the packet. A few summary thematic issues were documented in those NIMs. I think that's always supplemented by changes in the presentation and changes since the NIM that Mr. Yovanovich or the applicant would present and also by public speakers. And I'm just curious, do we know how many speakers are here from the public for this? CHAIRMAN FRYER: Well, we can ask. All those members from the public who are here and plan to speak on this, please raise your hand. All right. A further question: Is counsel for the Canopy Association here? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: Apparently not. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: And how many public speakers do we have on Zoom? MR. YOUNGBLOOD: We have two public speakers for this item. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Okay. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Okay, thank you. Go ahead, Commissioner Fry. COMMISSIONER FRY: So I guess, you know, I'm assuming that we can capture those issues and vet them as we do, I think I'm comfortable to proceed. I wish there were more representatives of the Canopy neighborhood here since they were the -- and the attorney. They were the primary raisers of the objections and the concerns, so... CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you. Mr. Eastman. MR. EASTMAN: I think we're concerned about developer statements and developer promises. And if I understood what you said, you could hear the developer clearly. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Yes. MR. EASTMAN: You couldn't hear the public. So that takes care of one side of the issues. Now, the public concern is the only thing that's left, and having members of the public here to tell us what the concerns were, along with the notes, I feel comfortable, along with the other commissioners who spoke to, you know, proceeding without redoing the NIM. I think that's efficient. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you. Commissioner Schmitt. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: No, I'm done. 5.A.a Packet Pg. 12 Attachment: 08-19-21CCPC Meeting Minutes - Formatted pdf (19978 : August 19, 2021 CCPC Meeting Minutes) August 19, 2021 Page 8 of 72 CHAIRMAN FRYER: Okay. Commissioner Klucik. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Yes. Well, I agree that -- with the sentiment that we have the information necessary to do our job, and in addition to that, we do have our, you know, attorney's assurance from his perspective that, as a matter of law, there's nothing that prevents us from going forward and accepting what we have, you know, despite the faultiness of it. And so I'm inclined to -- you know, to think that we don't really need to delay this anymore. We don't need a second NIM. I will say that I think, you know, we obviously could have petitioners who could be paying attention and become abusive about this kind of situation, and I think we can always -- we can always do what we want to do at that point, I think. I don't -- like, our attorney also said that we could say we need a second NIM. So it's really up to us. And I think if we think something -- you know, someone is taking advantage of -- you know, of a technical difficulty, which I don't think that this is the case, but if he suspected that, we could always, you know, impose the requirement for a second meeting according to what our attorney has said. So I'm comfortable going forward. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you. Commissioner Fry. COMMISSIONER FRY: I just wanted to ask one clarification from staff. I had an e-mail correspondence with Andrew Youngblood. I think that I expressed previously, and some of the other commissioners did, that we really find great value in the transcript. The word for -- the written transcript, and it's in some of our packages but not in all. So I believe it's not required, but it is often provided. So what -- is that simply up to the applicant whether they pay to have it transcribed? MR. BELLOWS: For the record, Ray Bellows. Yeah, that's at the applicant's discretion if they wanted to go to the expense of having a full transcript of a NIM, but that's not in our administrative code; just a summary, written summary findings. COMMISSIONER FRY: So just for the record, I mean, the advantage of that is that we can quote verbatim statements made by the developer and by the people in the public. We can refer to pages in our packet. So in my opinion, it's a much more effective standard for us to be effective in reviewing the NIM. MR. BELLOWS: Understood. And that's one reason we wanted the audio or video of the meetings as well, because you can really just get the sense of the attitude by viewing the video or listening to the tape. In this case, we do have the applicant repeating some of the questions that were being asked as well, so -- and plus our staff was there and took good notes. COMMISSIONER FRY: We do have ongoing issues, though. It's pretty common that something is inaudible or people don't say their name before they speak. It's like a recurring theme in here, well, we couldn't understand this in the NIM or that in the NIM. So is there any way that a transcript could become part of the standard? Is that something that is -- is it infeasible to do that? Is it -- I don't know if that's an expensive proposition. MR. BELLOWS: We would have to do some research. MR. KLATZKOW: The way you would have to do it -- you don't want a court reporter there. That doesn't make any sense. So what you'd have to do is you'd have to have a tape transcribed, which could be done. At that point in time, you're just talking about an expense whether you deem it appropriate to do this in the context of everything we do. At the end of the day, the expense would be on the developer. We would just charge the additional fee. But, again, it's -- you're the Planning Commission. This is something that I think should come from this board. COMMISSIONER FRY: Thank you. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Commissioner Schmitt. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Yeah. Let's -- again, I'm going to go back to, the 5.A.a Packet Pg. 13 Attachment: 08-19-21CCPC Meeting Minutes - Formatted pdf (19978 : August 19, 2021 CCPC Meeting Minutes) August 19, 2021 Page 9 of 72 purpose of the NIM was for the applicant to interface with the community, to receive the community input. And after that, as many NIMs, after meeting with the community and they begin to sense the issues that are raised, they adjust their plan accordingly if they can. I mean, that's what the NIM was about. It was -- it was never meant to be part of the administrative process. The administrative process meaning the actual staff report that we get is compiled by the staff. The issues are captured by the staff, they're supposed to be, and then either adjudicated through the -- in the review process or raised to the Planning Commissioners in the staff study, whether issues that were raised were either -- either solved or unsolved or basically noted. And our packet included several e-mails from residents in the area as well who raised concerns, and that is the purpose of the NIM. The NIM started because of the perception of the public that the developers were somehow secretively creating plans with the staff, and then the next thing you know it comes to the Planning Commission in an advertised public hearing. The NIM was meant to make sure that the public was aware months and months and months prior to any public hearing. To include the signs. And that -- and the advertisement in the paper. All three were part of the process of keeping the public informed, and that's what the NIM was supposed to be, and that's what the process is hopefully that -- the NIM, then, if there are any issues, the public would be here to raise their concerns. That's what this was all about. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you. Commissioner Klucik. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Yes. On your last point, Commissioner Schmitt -- and it was a point that Commissioner Fry made -- I would say that I -- you know, I live out in Ave Maria, and I've had issues that were before this -- you know, the Planning Commission and the County Commissioners, and it's asking a lot of people, you know. You know, they went to the NIM. The fact that they went to the NIM and they didn't come here, I generally am not going -- you know, I'm going to try to not hold that against people that, you know, have jobs or, you know, live a long ways away -- COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Yeah. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: -- or have no idea if it's going to be eight hours. You know, we never know. Just because it's on the schedule as the first item, we could have decided to postpone it until, you know, 2:00, you know. So the idea that people aren't here doesn't always sway me. I realize that wasn't your major point, Commissioner Fry, but I just wanted to bring that up as a -- I don't generally hold that against community members, because I think it's hard to come to one of these meetings no matter when and how much we try. Even if you tried to make an evening meeting, then people -- you know, some people can't come if it's an evening meeting, so... CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you, sir. Commissioner Vernon, you had your light on, then it went off. Did you have something to say, sir? COMMISSIONER VERNON: Yeah. First I just want to go back to the first thing Joe said in his first thoughts, and that is, I don't want to put any of this burden, if there is a problem to solve this problem, on the staff. I'm totally in agreement with Joe on that. Number two, if I don't know what to do, then I sort of put my judicial hat on. Putting my judicial hat, it seems to me, if I understood you correctly, Mr. Chairman, that you said it was required for the developer or the applicant to provide a video or -- excuse me, video or audio, which it did not do. So I think the -- they're in violation of the requirement but, again, I'm relying on what you just said. COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: There was audio. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Wait. There's an audio. COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: I listened to it. 5.A.a Packet Pg. 14 Attachment: 08-19-21CCPC Meeting Minutes - Formatted pdf (19978 : August 19, 2021 CCPC Meeting Minutes) August 19, 2021 Page 10 of 72 COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: There is an audio. COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: And you can hear it. COMMISSIONER VERNON: You can hear the whole thing? COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Yeah. COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: I skipped around, and I didn't have a problem. The petitioner was repeating the questions if people didn't hear. COMMISSIONER VERNON: All of the questions? COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: I didn't have a problem with it. It's a neighborhood information meeting. It's for the neighborhood. It's right in the title. COMMISSIONER VERNON: No, I understand. COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: Geez. COMMISSIONER VERNON: The audio is completely -- you could hear everything on the audio? I thought you couldn't. I thought there was one microphone. COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: I could hear it. CHAIRMAN FRYER: I've got it here and could play excerpts of it if you want to, but I don't think it's necessary. I think staff will concur that the members of the public were almost totally inaudible; is that correct? MR. BELLOWS: Yeah. For the record, Ray Bellows. I did listen to both the audio and the Zoom recording of the NIM, and the one-speaker system worked great picking up the agent, and the agent you could hear very clearly. The public responding you could barely hear things, but it wasn't -- I couldn't discern what they were saying. But in some cases, I'm not -- I don't know if it was every time, but most of the cases he did repeat the question. COMMISSIONER VERNON: But that's my point. To me it's not -- I mean, to me, presenting the audio is presenting the complete audio. So if it is a requirement of the developer, I don't think they met it, so that's my point. I think based on what Jeff said, we do have discretion. And sort of moving to my quasi-judicial hat, you get into the intent, and it sounds like the intent was met, the purpose was met. But given at least my belief that the requirement was not met, I would suggest we reserve ruling until we get later into the day before we make a decision on whether there should be another NIM, because my understanding was there was about 20 people at the NIM, and there's only about four people here. So I don't think the applicant or anybody's going to be prejudiced in any way if we reserve ruling on whether we need another NIM. Go ahead and hear everything we need to hear today and make a decision after we've heard everything today. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you. Commissioner Shea. COMMISSIONER SHEA: Is it out of the line if I just make the motion that we proceed? CHAIRMAN FRYER: You're entitled to make whatever motion you wish. COMMISSIONER SHEA: I would like to make a motion we proceed hearing -- COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: I'll second. COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: Yeah. CHAIRMAN FRYER: All right. It's been moved and seconded that we proceed with the hearing. Is your motion addressing the question of whether we accept the NIM tape or reject it? MR. KLATZKOW: If you're going to proceed with the hearing, the NIM issue is done. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Right. COMMISSIONER SHEA: Exactly. COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: Yeah. COMMISSIONER SHEA: My intent is that the NIM issue is done. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Okay. Is that the intent of the second? COMMISSIONER SHEA: If we need a future change in our policy, I don't think we need 5.A.a Packet Pg. 15 Attachment: 08-19-21CCPC Meeting Minutes - Formatted pdf (19978 : August 19, 2021 CCPC Meeting Minutes) August 19, 2021 Page 11 of 72 to do that now. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Okay. So it's been moved that we proceed and we -- implicit in that decision is that we're going to accept the NIM audiotape; is that the second? COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: I'm going to go ahead and ask for -- suggest a friendly amendment that we include the -- that we proceed and we are -- in voting to proceed, we're stating that a second NIM is not necessary. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Okay. Does the movant agree to that? COMMISSIONER SHEA: Yes. CHAIRMAN FRYER: All right. Any discussion? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: I just have one comment, and that is -- and it's been somewhat vitiated by the lack of public attendance here. I was going to try to be a little more lenient than usual in letting the public speak to be sure that, if we had adequate representation, that we wouldn't cut people off after three minutes or five minutes if they hadn't made their presentation and try to cure the NIM problem in that fashion. I'm not sure that that is going to work, but I'm going to, I guess, reserve judgment on that, and if -- COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: I would concur. I'd give them all the time they want. COMMISSIONER SHEA: I would, too. CHAIRMAN FRYER: All right. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: No problem. COMMISSIONER FRY: I would defer to your judgment, Mr. Chairman, in offering people additional time. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you. Any further discussion on the motion? Does it need to be restated? Everybody understand what's before us? COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: And -- but what you just said isn't really part of the motion. That's just how we're dealing with it. CHAIRMAN FRYER: No, it's just part of the discussion, yeah. Okay. All those in favor, please say aye. COMMISSIONER SHEA: Aye. COMMISSIONER FRY: Aye. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Aye. COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: Aye. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Aye. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Aye. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Opposed? COMMISSIONER VERNON: Aye. CHAIRMAN FRYER: It passes 6-1. Thank you. Mr. Yovanovich, I should have given you an opportunity to speak, but I wouldn't want you to risk seizing failure out of the jaws of victory. MR. YOVANOVICH: I'm a little out of practice. It's been six weeks since I've been here, so -- for the record, Rich Yovanovich. One of the hardest things to do is to sit here and be quiet. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Oh, I hear you. MR. YOVANOVICH: As I'm sure Mr. Vernon and Mr. Klucik know, when you're watching the judge talking, you're just praying it goes your way. But I do thank you for allowing us to go forward. I want to introduce the team. And I am going to make just a few comments related to what happened since the NIM to hopefully put your minds at ease that their -- the neighborhood's concerns were, in fact, heard and were, in fact, met with, but I'll get to that after introducing the team. With me this morning from D.R. Horton are Wayne Everett and Mark Brumfield. 5.A.a Packet Pg. 16 Attachment: 08-19-21CCPC Meeting Minutes - Formatted pdf (19978 : August 19, 2021 CCPC Meeting Minutes) August 19, 2021 Page 12 of 72 Introduce myself, I'm the land-use counsel. The agents for the applicant from RWA is Ken Gallander, he's our planner, and you'll hear from him during the presentation. Our engineer is Joel Blikstad. He can answer questions regarding civil engineering. Is Mr. Treesh here? Oh, TR Transportation is here. Craig Smith from DexBender, our environmental consultant, is here. And Kristen Petry from -- is our landscape architect, who is also here and can answer questions we have -- or you have regarding the presentation. The subject property is 18.4 acres. It's at the southwest corner of Tree Farm Road and Massey Street. Just for those -- and we'll show you a map in a moment. Massey Street actually runs in a north/south direction. It meets Woodcrest, which goes up to Immokalee Road, and many, many years ago -- I know Mr. Schmitt was around, but I don't think anybody on this Planning Commission was around at the time -- the county's transportation system was designed to have Woodcrest and Massey connect all the way down to Vanderbilt Beach Road, and Tree Farm Road was supposed to also be connected to Woodcrest/Massey, and it was to be a bypass from the intersection of Immokalee Road and Collier Boulevard. There's a light at Woodcrest on Immokalee Road, so it's a bypass road. It's always been designed to accommodate that traffic to try to get traffic away from the intersection. And you also have the Vanderbilt Beach Road extension occurring as part of the transportation improvements. But we're getting to what was planned many, many years ago as part of the transportation system. Our property is less than 20 acres. It's designated urban residential subdistrict. Under the Comprehensive Plan or the Growth Management Plan, it's an infill parcel. What's an infill parcel? An infill parcel is a parcel of land less than 20 acres in size. And under the Comprehensive Plan, your Comprehensive Plan encourages increases in density on infill parcels, and that's what we're in under is under the residential infill provisions of your Growth Management Plan to go from the base density of four units per acre to seven units per acre. The county's had that infill process for quite a number of years, approximately 20 years ago when the Rural Fringe Mixed-Use District provisions were adopted into your Growth Management Plan. The three-unit-per-acre increase has now been tied to the acquisition of TDRs, Transfer of Development Rights. So in order to increase the density from four units per acre to seven units per acre to get the three bonus units, you have to buy one TDR for each acre to get the full three. So you have to buy -- if you want to get one unit, you've got to buy it through a TDR. If you want to get the full three, you've got to buy a TDR. So we will be acquiring 18 or 19 TDRs to entitle this project when we come forward with a plat. So this infill provision is part of the Rural Fringe Mixed-Use District provisions and is a mechanism for those people who had sending lands to actually get compensated for losing their development rights. So this project furthers your infill provisions as well as your TDR provisions in the Growth Management Plan. The overall project request is for 130 dwelling units. We obviously have an amenity tract, and Ken will take you through that. We have a clubhouse. We've the full range of allowed residential uses; detached single-family, townhomes, et cetera, are all being permitted through the PUD. We have a concurrent plat going through the project -- going through the process right now, and the current plan for development is townhomes, but should the market change and townhomes are no longer in favor, we have the ability to do other uses. We will have -- this piece of property is in a floodplain, so we have to do additional floodplain compensation, and that affected how the master plan lays out, and Ken will kind of take you through that. And then we always -- we have our typical preserve tract. I've already addressed this slide, but I wanted to -- I'm going to bring Ken up in a moment. But this is the layout of Woodcrest/Massey that I discussed earlier. Here's Woodcrest. To the north is Immokalee Road and to the south is Vanderbilt Beach Road, and this is Tree Farm Road. And this is -- if you've -- those of you who have done the site visit, you know this little roundabout 5.A.a Packet Pg. 17 Attachment: 08-19-21CCPC Meeting Minutes - Formatted pdf (19978 : August 19, 2021 CCPC Meeting Minutes) August 19, 2021 Page 13 of 72 here, and this, obviously, is the property. So the transportation system always contemplated traffic coming from Immokalee Road and finding its way over to Collier Boulevard either at Tree Farm Road or going all the way down to Vanderbilt Beach Road to get traffic. So there has been plans for, you know, more than 20 years, and it goes back even to -- this is Warm Springs that's in your staff report. This is Bristol Pines, which is not in your staff report. But Bristol Pines is a -- COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Which one is that? MR. YOVANOVICH: This is Bristol Pines PUD. It's a -- it's not referenced in your staff report, but it's a project that I worked on many years ago. It's approved at seven units per acre. It's a townhome project, so it is very similar to what is being contemplated over here in the Soluna project. This is Brynwood Preserve. It is four units an acre, and this is Warm Springs that was also approved. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Excuse me, Mr. Yovanovich. You said this, but I was not watching the monitor. Would you show me again where the other seven DUA development is. MR. YOVANOVICH: This piece and this piece up here are all part of Bristol Pines, which was approved at seven units per acre. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Okay, thank you. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Mr. Chairman? CHAIRMAN FRYER: Yes, Mr. Klucik. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: So your point -- and you mentioned it twice now, to have that traffic flow. Your point is, I guess, that it's not a quiet area or -- I'm just trying to figure out what your point -- MR. YOVANOVICH: A couple of reasons for that point -- COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Sure. MR. YOVANOVICH: -- is one, there was always contemplated traffic would come here but, two, there has always been -- and we hear continually concerns about Immokalee Road. How does Immokalee Road function? The traffic signal at Immokalee Road and Collier Boulevard at times can be backed up. And I'm just -- COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: This is a stress reliever? MR. YOVANOVICH: This was always intended to bring relief to that intersection and relief from Immokalee Road and together with Vanderbilt Beach Road will bring further relief from Immokalee Road because, as your staff report indicates, there are portions of Immokalee Road today that are not at their adopted level of service, but your staff has acknowledged that the improvements that are being made will relieve those issues. So I just wanted to bring those up and -- COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Is that just because you were anticipating concerns about the increased traffic, you know, so, therefore, what you're saying is, well, there was always an anticipation that there would be a lot more traffic on -- MR. YOVANOVICH: There's always comments about traffic on roads, and I've anticipated enough times that some people on the Planning Commission bring up Immokalee Road. No disrespect to the Chairman. But we talked about it, and I just wanted to get that on the record early. I'm sure the Chairman's still going to raise -- ask questions about it, but I just wanted to address those concerns. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Sorry for the diversion. MR. YOVANOVICH: That's okay. You're good. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Commissioner Schmitt. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: You mentioned the -- I'll call it the roundabout or traffic circle. I believe part of the intent was when staff -- did the county actually pay for that construction? Because part of the intent of that traffic circle was, again, a traffic-calming device but also to merge for part of the -- what was planned many years ago as, quote -- you used the word as a "bypass" around the Immokalee/Collier Boulevard, but I believe that roundabout was actually 5.A.a Packet Pg. 18 Attachment: 08-19-21CCPC Meeting Minutes - Formatted pdf (19978 : August 19, 2021 CCPC Meeting Minutes) August 19, 2021 Page 14 of 72 constructed by the county, and I'm not sure. MR. YOVANOVICH: I'm going to -- I'm going to punt that question to your staff. I do know that some of Tree Farm Road and some of -- COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Do I see Mike hiding back there? MR. YOVANOVICH: -- the Woodcrest extension were at developer expense, but I don't know specifically regarding the traffic circle. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Just, Mike, for the record, I don't know if you have input on that question. I know we're interrupting Rich's presentation, but this is a piece -- since we're talking about it. Go ahead, Mike. MR. SAWYER: Yeah. For the record, Mike Sawyer, Transportation Planning. Collier County did construct that. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Yes. MR. SAWYER: I believe that there were participation from the adjacent communities to pay -- help pay for that fair share. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Fair share, and impact fees. MR. SAWYER: Correct, exactly. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Okay. MR. SAWYER: As far as this particular area, Massey is going to be improved along with Vanderbilt Drive, just so everybody knows. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Okay. That's what I thought. Thanks, Mike. MR. SAWYER: Sure. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Commissioner Vernon. COMMISSIONER VERNON: I'm not lit up. CHAIRMAN FRYER: I'm sorry? COMMISSIONER VERNON: No, I had no question. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Okay. Commissioner Fry. COMMISSIONER FRY: Rich, you mentioned Bristol Pines, which I believe is the most dense community in the immediate vicinity, correct? MR. YOVANOVICH: (Nods head.) COMMISSIONER FRY: So if the agricultural parcels qualify for four DUA, how did Bristol Pines -- without the residential infill bonus, how did it get to seven DUA? MR. YOVANOVICH: It is an affordable housing project. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Correct. MR. YOVANOVICH: And it was one of two that I worked on before the Great Recession that -- going through the process, it was an owner-occupied project that had certain number of units dedicated to affordable housing, because at the time, because we were over 20 acres, the method to increase the density was through the affordable housing density bonus program. COMMISSIONER FRY: Great. Thank you. MR. YOVANOVICH: Any more? CHAIRMAN FRYER: Any other questions? No one is lit up at this point. MR. YOVANOVICH: So I do want to touch a little bit on what we do at NIMs and how important they are and actually what happens after a NIM, typically, and did happen in this case. Ironically, I was hired for this project because of the NIM and because of your staff's thorough review and recollection of what happened at the NIM and some comments that came in the review letter for this project because of issues that were raised at the NIM. So your -- just to put your mind at ease, I hope, Tim Finn did a great job summarizing all of the residents' concerns and, in fact, had asked for certain revisions to the project based upon those concerns, and that's how I got involved. Also, we met with residents of -- not me personally, but Mr. Gallander who's here met personally with residents of Canopy, which is this project right here, I think specifically residents 5.A.a Packet Pg. 19 Attachment: 08-19-21CCPC Meeting Minutes - Formatted pdf (19978 : August 19, 2021 CCPC Meeting Minutes) August 19, 2021 Page 15 of 72 in this area, to talk about their concerns about the project, walked their property, and we'll show you pictures of their buffer and how we did sightline analyses since then to show them how we're not going to negatively impact them. But I think it's important to know that we as developers take these NIMs seriously, and we do follow up, and we do meet with -- we don't always give them everything they want, but we do, in fact, follow up and we meet with them and we take their considerations into our design. I did enough projects in this area. This is Vanderbilt Drive Country Club. I didn't do every project in this corridor, but I did most of them that abut Vanderbilt Country Club. And before I was even contacted, I think I told my client, let me ask -- let me guess, the nearby residents want you to put in a solid wall? And that was one of the comments, "Put in a solid wall," because Vanderbilt Country Club and the other surrounding communities don't have solid walls. And my response has always been, if you wanted to live in a community that had solid walls around it, you should have bought in a community that had solid walls around it. You shouldn't be requiring the adjacent property owner to put in solid walls. So we've addressed some of those concerns. We'll have a chain-link fence hidden in landscaping to, obviously, address that. But our response was, we're not going to give you a solid wall on our border so you effectively have all of the surrounding development build the wall you didn't want -- you didn't require when you moved in your community. Those are the kind of comments that we didn't agree to. We did agree to others in dealing with this project -- with this process as part of the NIM. So I just want you to know that although there was some issues with the quality of the audio, those issues will be addressed and corrected. It's a simple fix: Have a second microphone. I will tell you, I will never be able to totally control people speaking all over each other and maybe not identifying themselves in the record, but we do our best to try to do that. But I'm sure Mr. Gallander will make sure he has a second microphone at the next one to make sure that the public hears -- the public comment can be heard. But I do think the public has been heard through that process. The intent of the NIM was met, and I appreciate that you-all have decided to move forward with that. With that, I'm going to have Mr. Gallander come up here, take you through the master plan. It specifically addressed the buffers, the development standards associated with the project, and the compatibility with the neighbors because there were several comments from neighbors regarding compatibility. And then we'll open it up to any questions you have. My entire consultant team is here to answer any questions you may have, but we're going to focus on the planning aspects, but that doesn't mean the other aspects are not important, and if you would like to address those, that's fine with us. An important thing to remember is your staff, every discipline, is recommending approval and has found us consistent with your Comprehensive Plan. And with that, I'll turn it over to Mr. Gallander unless Mr. Klucik has a question. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Commissioner Klucik. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Mr. Chairman, you know, I guess from what I've seen and, you know, getting the briefing -- of course I haven't made up my mind yet, but it seems -- how long do you think your presentation is going to be, because I almost -- MR. YOVANOVICH: Ten minutes. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: -- feel -- how much? MR. YOVANOVICH: Ten minutes tops. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Ten minutes, okay, great, because I'm, you know, not thinking that there's much that we're going to hear that's unexpected. It seems like a pretty straightforward proposal from what I've seen. And I'm trying to figure out, you know, the basis for the objection, you know, in law, that would, you know, cause us to say that there's a reason, you know, because we're sitting quasi-judicially on this. 5.A.a Packet Pg. 20 Attachment: 08-19-21CCPC Meeting Minutes - Formatted pdf (19978 : August 19, 2021 CCPC Meeting Minutes) August 19, 2021 Page 16 of 72 MR. YOVANOVICH: And, Mr. Klucik, I agree with you. I don't think there's a basis to say no -- COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Yeah, so I'm just -- MR. YOVANOVICH: -- under the law. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: I'm just -- I'm just hoping that we -- you know, I'm glad to hear it's only 10 minutes, because I don't want it to be like we're here for hours hearing things that we already know. MR. YOVANOVICH: I didn't feel the need to do a much longer presentation that I would have done with others where we've had many, many, many more people involved. So, with that, I'll turn it over to Mr. Gallander. MR. GALLANDER: So I might need to take a few pages out of this. No, just kidding. Thank you, Mr. Yovanovich. And, again, Mr. Chairman, Commissioners, I'm Ken Gallander, certified planner with RWA. Thank you for this opportunity. And I also will make some statements towards the end about the NIM. But what Mr. Yovanovich said, I'm going to just take us through just as quickly as possible, and just bear with me as we work through this along some of the key aspects of our development. And as we -- as Mr. Yovanovich pointed out, I just want to just quickly go through the perspective of our subject property in relation to all the residential existing developments near us. And I won't go further into that but, again, the aspect of infill, and this is an ideal example of that in this area. So next I want to just drill down on our master plan. And what we have here is just a typical master plan that is developed in similar configurations. To the northwest we have our single access, primary access. There are no other access points to the development. The single one off of Tree Farm Road. Then throughout the development we've got an amenity tract just right at the entrance, and then surrounding our internal lake are the residential tracts with the circular network for mobility throughout the development. One key area I think is necessary to point out is the significant preserve to the north -- COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Mr. Chairman? CHAIRMAN FRYER: Yes, Commissioner. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Just for clarification. Okay. So you have L, which is the lake, right? MR. GALLANDER: Yes. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: And then you have a ring around that. MR. GALLANDER: Which is the right-of-way. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Well -- well, the R? MR. GALLANDER: Yes, the residential. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Those are residential. And then you have a roadway, right? MR. GALLANDER: That's correct, the right-of-way. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: And then you have more residential. That's what that is? MR. GALLANDER: Correct. All the Rs represent the residential tract. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Okay. And so you have -- when I'm looking at this, then, to the south, you really don't have any residential. You have roadway. MR. GALLANDER: Correct. The roadway -- COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: And it's really to the west is where you're going to have the units that seem to be most -- well, that's where you actually have new buildings that are going to be butting up against neighboring communities, and to the south you have a roadway that's -- MR. GALLANDER: That is correct. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: -- butting up against neighboring communities. MR. GALLANDER: That is correct. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: And so that's where the issues arise? 5.A.a Packet Pg. 21 Attachment: 08-19-21CCPC Meeting Minutes - Formatted pdf (19978 : August 19, 2021 CCPC Meeting Minutes) August 19, 2021 Page 17 of 72 MR. GALLANDER: Right. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Okay. MR. GALLANDER: Concerns our neighbors to the west -- COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: I'm kind of slow like Colombo, so I just -- I like to get clarity up front. MR. GALLANDER: So this may help. You can see -- COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Great. MR. GALLANDER: I was going move to into that, but let's just jump to this one. This is our overlay of our master plan with overlay on an aerial showing the correlation or the relations with our neighbors to the north, to the west, and to the south. So, again, from this perspective, this kind of takes us into the aspects of compatibility. And what I want to emphasize -- COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Before you get into that, I wanted to -- CHAIRMAN FRYER: Go ahead, Mr. Schmitt. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Your preserve that you identified -- MR. GALLANDER: Yes. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: -- that was deemed to be the best suitable land, the preserve. Is it jurisdictional wetlands there, or was it just deemed to be the best area to create your preserve? MR. GALLANDER: In combination to that. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Okay. MR. GALLANDER: So our ecologist can speak a little bit more clearly to that, if necessary. But, yes, the design of the project relied upon having that significant area to that -- to the east there to preserve the native vegetation. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Okay. MR. GALLANDER: And also, if I may just clarify also, Mr. Yovanovich pointed out the floodplain compensation area. That is this F designation tract, and that is a component of managing for floodplain aspects of the area. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Will that look like wilderness? Is that what that's -- that whole area or -- MR. GALLANDER: It's not going to be a wilderness. It is a managed area, so it's a depression area, so it will be cleared and utilized for those purposes of ensuring for floodplain management. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Commissioner Vernon. COMMISSIONER VERNON: Yeah. As much as I like to talk, I have not been lighting up, so I don't know why -- CHAIRMAN FRYER: Oh, you're not? Sorry. Commissioner Shea. COMMISSIONER SHEA: Just to stick on the last topic we were talking about, does that preserve area have to be there? I mean, obviously, if you could line it up on the other side of the property, you'd have a lot less complaints but, obviously, you can't do that. MR. GALLANDER: Right. Through our evaluation and analysis, this is what we've determined to be the best layout and arrangement for -- COMMISSIONER SHEA: Is it possible to put it on the other areas to form additional buffers with the residentials that are there? MR. GALLANDER: If we were, that's -- MR. YOVANOVICH: Mr. Shea, if I may. Under the Comp Plan, we have to keep the largest, most contiguous area for preservation. So if you go back, you'll see in the existing conditions of the property, the largest most contiguous area for the native vegetation preserve is exactly where we're keeping it. It would have been real easy for us if we were allowed to do it other ways, but between the floodplain compensation requirements and the largest most contiguous 5.A.a Packet Pg. 22 Attachment: 08-19-21CCPC Meeting Minutes - Formatted pdf (19978 : August 19, 2021 CCPC Meeting Minutes) August 19, 2021 Page 18 of 72 area requirements, the site plan laid out the way the site plan had to lay out. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Mr. Eastman. MR. EASTMAN: Speaking about the floodplain and the floodplain management, will you disperse less water from this site as it is today? After your proposal here to build it, will you disperse less water after it's built, if it is built, onto your neighbors because the water's managed? Are you improving the drainage situation for your neighbors by managing the floodplain waters here with this project? MR. GALLANDER: What I want to do is have our engineer come up and speak to those technical aspects of it. MR. BLIKSTAD: For the record, Joel Blikstad with RWA Engineering. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Would you mind saying your name a little slower. MR. BLIKSTAD: Joel Blikstad. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Blikstad? MR. BLIKSTAD: Blikstad. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you, sir. MR. BLIKSTAD: I believe the question was, will we adversely affect the neighbors. We are going through the South Florida Water Management District permitting process, and as part of that, we had to demonstrate no adverse impacts. This will be a managed water management system. There will not be any offsite flow to the neighbors to the south or to the west there. We will have our proper berming in place. So I guess the short answer is, no, there will be no adverse impacts to the surrounding developments. MR. EASTMAN: Will there also be an improvement, or is there water that's draining on your neighbors now as this naturally sits, and you'll discontinue that by managing the flood waters? MR. BLIKSTAD: The way that the calculations worked out for this site, this site stored water in the existing condition for the neighbors. We are preserving that, and that's one of the reasons we have the floodplain compensation area to continue to store water for the neighbors to provide, like I said, no adverse impacts to the floodplain that was stored in the existing condition. MR. EASTMAN: So it's fair to say it's no better and no worse? MR. BLIKSTAD: Correct. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Commissioner Fry. COMMISSIONER FRY: Could we go back one slide, please. So to nutshell what's been said here -- actually go back one more slide, please. It shows the two cleared areas. Yeah, the two large cleared areas on the west side that currently have the communication towers, you're saying that, obviously, the natural preserve area, the only area that isn't already disturbed, is that -- is the eastern portion of that. So you've taken that and you've made it -- you split it between preserve and floodplain management, which is the only practical way to approach it. So you could not feasibly have put the preserve on the west side protecting Canopy. MR. BLIKSTAD: Correct. Collier County also -- I think Rich was speaking to this -- is not a fan -- in their code they are not a fan of very narrow preserve here, and that did not meet the width requirement to be a preserve, nor the area requirement. COMMISSIONER FRY: Okay. That answers it. Thank you. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Continue, sir. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Just to -- CHAIRMAN FRYER: Oh, I'm sorry. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: I didn't press my button. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Commissioner Klucik, go ahead. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: So when you say "not a fan of," I actually like colloquial language, but does that mean that it's not allowed? MR. YOVANOVICH: The answer is no, I couldn't do it because I couldn't meet the code requirements for your preservation requirements by putting a long, narrow strip of preserve along 5.A.a Packet Pg. 23 Attachment: 08-19-21CCPC Meeting Minutes - Formatted pdf (19978 : August 19, 2021 CCPC Meeting Minutes) August 19, 2021 Page 19 of 72 the eastern boundary. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: And, in theory, we could grant -- I don't know. Could we -- MR. YOVANOVICH: Our western boundary; western boundary, sorry. See, I'm directionally challenged. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Mr. Klatzkow, could we -- could we authorize, you know, that they -- that they -- you know, a deviation from that? COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: No, no. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Okay. Not that I think that's the appropriate. I'm just wondering what the possibilities are to -- because I think, if it -- you know, if it's possible, then the people who are, you know, here, the residents who are here, you know, it would be good if they know that that's a possibility. And if it's not possible legally, then, you know, we don't really have a choice. MR. YOVANOVICH: I know it's tempting, but if we can go just two more slides, I think we can address what's on our western boundary today and what we will be planting, basically, adjacent to it for that buffer. And I think, in my opinion, it more than addresses the concerns of those -- I think it's five homes that are on that border, the western border that are living within Canopy. So if you can bear with us, hopefully we'll address those, but if not, we'll -- COMMISSIONER FRY: Two, but only two, Rich. MR. YOVANOVICH: Okay. I'm going to bank that I counted correctly that it's two slides. MR. GALLANDER: You want me to -- MR. YOVANOVICH: Keep going. MR. GALLANDER: Okay. So back to the compatibility aspect of it, I want to just quickly go through the uses. Mr. Yovanovich spoke to these at the beginning. In my professional opinion, in terms of the uses, Soluna is proposing the single-family, the townhouses, multifamily uses. Those are all consistent and compatible with those uses that are also approved under the developments to the north, to the west, and to the south. In terms of development standards, also professional opinion, we are consistent and compatible with the development standards. Staff had also provided an analysis in your packet of the consistency with the development standards. I think one particular aspect, looking at our setback standards, we are providing a minimum Planned Unit Development perimeter setback, which is the setback, obviously, in association with the overall perimeter boundary of the Soluna project. Typically what you find in the approved Planned Unit Developments is a 15-foot setback from the perimeter, and sometimes there's none. Then you rely upon the rear setback that's typically around 10 feet. We're providing 30 feet, so twice that distance that's typically found, so I just wanted to point that key aspect. Height, we're consistent. We're at 30 feet zoned consistent with our surrounding neighbors. For the buffers -- COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Can you show that 30 feet? Because I'm not understanding. MR. GALLANDER: I can show you that in a follow-up slide. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Okay. MR. GALLANDER: It will help us. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: I apologize, Mr. Chairman. MR. GALLANDER: Sure. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you. MR. GALLANDER: Yeah, I don't have -- we don't have setbacks orientated on our 5.A.a Packet Pg. 24 Attachment: 08-19-21CCPC Meeting Minutes - Formatted pdf (19978 : August 19, 2021 CCPC Meeting Minutes) August 19, 2021 Page 20 of 72 master plan, just the buffers. But for purposes of that, it would be -- this is a 15-foot Type B buffer. It would be another 15 feet beyond that dashed line in terms of sort of a scalable reference for you. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Further to that, how will -- how will that commitment find its way into the ordinance? MR. YOVANOVICH: It's in there. MR. GALLANDER: It's in the Planned Unit Development document, or it's in the document as a part of our -- CHAIRMAN FRYER: Is it an exhibit? MR. GALLANDER: Yes, it is. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Okay. Well, it's not in the master plan, which is C. MR. GALLANDER: Right, but -- CHAIRMAN FRYER: Where is it? MR. GALLANDER: It's in the development standards. MR. YOVANOVICH: It's in the Development Standards Table. CHAIRMAN FRYER: That's what I wanted to know. Thank you. MR. GALLANDER: Sorry for that mis -- CHAIRMAN FRYER: No problem. MR. GALLANDER: No, that's all right. Looking at our buffers, key aspects of that are what is in relation to our neighbors to our west and to our south. As stated before, 15-foot Type B buffer, and the typically required buffer along the right-of-ways of a 20-foot Type D buffer, and those have been found consistent and compliant with the LDC, which is based on that for compatibility purposes. So moving to this slide that we looked at just briefly before, this is just really an appropriate example of the perimeter buffer that is on the Canopy, and this was during my site visit with the neighbors. They were kind enough to invite me out there, and we walked the properties and walked the buffer just to see, and that's an important aspect of doing any project, understanding your relations with your neighbors. And what you can see here is a well-established hedge row and then the palm trees and the pines. That is their portion of their buffer requirement. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Commissioner Klucik. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Right. So what we're looking at is you're standing on one of the lots to the west -- MR. GALLANDER: Correct. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: -- where there's a house right behind where the camera is? MR. GALLANDER: Yep. I was, I believe, in this general area here. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: And we're looking at those rows of trees that are there on that image -- this image that we're looking at now. MR. GALLANDER: Correct. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: And those are all going to stay intact just how they are, and then you're going to also add -- MR. GALLANDER: Right. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: -- more in that 15 feet that we see on the dotted line? There's going to be more trees there, more vegetation there? MR. GALLANDER: So for our project, then we will -- and the intent is, if possible, to maintain any existing trees, but that may not be possible. But the requirement for providing our buffer, we will be meeting the similar requirements that Canopy is doing on that. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: So it would be almost a duplication of what we see here but from the other perspective? MR. GALLANDER: Exactly, looking from -- this is looking towards the east, so this is looking, again, towards this way. 5.A.a Packet Pg. 25 Attachment: 08-19-21CCPC Meeting Minutes - Formatted pdf (19978 : August 19, 2021 CCPC Meeting Minutes) August 19, 2021 Page 21 of 72 CHAIRMAN FRYER: Commissioner Fry. COMMISSIONER FRY: Ken, sorry to interrupt -- MR. GALLANDER: Yes, sir. COMMISSIONER FRY: -- but I think it's relevant and timely is that from the materials, Canopy has a 10-foot Type B buffer and you have a 15-foot-wide Type B buffer, similar vegetation just in a wider swath on your side of the property line. MR. GALLANDER: Yes, that's correct. My research has indicated that Canopy or Buttonwood Preserve has required a 10-foot landscape buffer on their side. COMMISSIONER FRY: You mentioned a 30-foot perimeter buffer. MR. GALLANDER: Setback. COMMISSIONER FRY: Setback. Thirty feet exactly to what? Is that to the property line of the closest houses? Is it to a building? Is it to a driveway? What is the 30 feet setback to? MR. GALLANDER: So this is moving on to another -- next slide. And this will help -- this is the property line or the perimeter boundary, the Planned Unit Development boundary. To the right is Soluna. To the left would be Canopy. And this top slide is a -- at time of planting for these buffers. And so from -- you can see this dimension of the 15-foot Type B buffer. So there would be another 15 feet for setback from that perimeter boundary from this property line. So 30 feet back, no building, primary building, could be within that setback. And that's -- and these are to our scale of what we are proposing through our development project in terms of the 15-foot buffer. Our building is well beyond even the 30-foot setback perimeter. This also references a two-story structure. And what -- moving on to this exhibit, this shows on the Canopy side their existing buffer as it's matured over time. To the right, within Soluna's, is our buffer at time of planting. And the line of sight, which was a concern about privacy and -- which is legitimate, and so we wanted to go back and analyze and look at so what do our technical requirements -- and how does this look from a cross-section point of view? And we have a perspective of an individual on the second story and their sightline down into the neighboring property. And what we've -- our opinion of what we see here is that the existing buffer on the Canopy is sufficient to provide the privacy. Then, as required, we will provide our buffer, and as it grows, in the bottom portion of this slide image, is maturity, four to five years of our trees, our shrubs, hedge work growing. It further impedes that sightline. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Commissioner Klucik. COMMISSIONER FRY: Sorry. I wasn't quite finished. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Oh, I'm sorry. Commissioner Fry, then Commissioner Klucik. COMMISSIONER FRY: So in the comments from neighbors, the letter from Katrina Curran referenced concerns over visibility from the second floor -- MR. GALLANDER: Yes, sir. COMMISSIONER FRY: -- into the backyards. Also that it would be -- the visibility would take five years to be diminished by your landscaping as it grew. Has this changed since the NIM, since meetings with the neighbors? Are we likely to hear people stand up and say, yes, they've addressed our concerns, or are you still at odds with the neighbors in terms of whether this is a sufficient buffer? MR. GALLANDER: We are still at this point -- we have not changed our plan post the NIM at this point, so we are at this opportunity during the public hearing to address that. COMMISSIONER FRY: Okay. Thank you. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Commissioner Klucik. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Yes, thank you. So am I right -- I can't quite see it that clearly. On the top -- no, no, on the top number -- MR. GALLANDER: Yes. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: -- right there, that's to the wall, from the border to the wall 5.A.a Packet Pg. 26 Attachment: 08-19-21CCPC Meeting Minutes - Formatted pdf (19978 : August 19, 2021 CCPC Meeting Minutes) August 19, 2021 Page 22 of 72 that's 38 or 36? MR. GALLANDER: 38.7 feet. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: And by rights that could be 30 feet? MR. GALLANDER: Correct. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: For whatever reason, it's further than it needs to be. MR. GALLANDER: Right. Our design of the project dictated that. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Right. So I'm just trying to figure out -- and this is really, you know, maybe a question not necessarily for you, although I'm sure either you or Mr. Yovanovich could answer it. But I think it's an important question. I'm thinking that, you know, because of the infill and, you know, this is land that seems like there's no reason why you wouldn't expect that that would end up being, you know, a similar usage to -- you know, to the neighboring land, and, you know, if they were going to have an individual house there that was, you know, the same height -- what is this; two stories? MR. YOVANOVICH: Two stories. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Right. So you have a two-story single home just like the neighboring -- Canopy? Just like Canopy. Let's say we had the exact same kind of project as Canopy. You'd still have a two-story house looking in. And I'm just trying to figure out, is there some legal basis to say people can't build a house next to you without an extra buffer that's not even necessary because people will be able to, you know, see your house? I just -- I'm trying to figure out -- I understand that we would all like to not have people -- we'd all like to have more privacy. I'm just trying to figure out legally -- I think it's great that you're addressing it, but it seems like you wouldn't even need to. It's just -- it's good planning, but it's not legally necessary. You could come before us and have a buffer that really wasn't going to end up providing this much concealment. MR. YOVANOVICH: Correct. We're meeting the Land Development Code requirements for buffers where you have multifamily adjacent to single-family. We're meeting the requirements. What we didn't have -- Mr. Fry, just so you know, we didn't have the sightline studies at the NIM. We provided and prepared the sightline studies so the residents can understand what real-world sightlines exist today. And when ours is ultimately a few years after planting, you're going to have double the protection from the sightline. So to say we didn't address it is not totally correct. We didn't make a change, but we did show them through the sightline analysis with the existing -- the existing sightlines that we can't see through your berm, your berm and buffer, and you will not see through our berm and buffer after a reasonable period of time for those trees to grow. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Well, right. And so if we could go back to that picture, because that was going to be my next question is -- the picture that's the actual photograph. That actually -- I know the angle can always make it seem different than it is. We actually have a continuous sightline breakup there, you know, with the actual buffer trees, or like let's say you got rid of -- I mean, I know you're going to try to preserve the trees that are there. MR. YOVANOVICH: Those are their trees. They're on their property. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: No, I know. Well, but behind -- MR. YOVANOVICH: Behind it. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Behind the palm tree, for instance, are we starting to get to the vegetation that's already there on your land? MR. GALLANDER: That's correct. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: So you're intending to keep that there, if possible? MR. YOVANOVICH: We will keep as many trees as we can, but through the normal construction process, there will be some that are -- that don't survive the process, and our required buffer will supplement that and result in the sightline analysis you see on this slide. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Well -- and is -- what we're seeing in the cross-section, is 5.A.a Packet Pg. 27 Attachment: 08-19-21CCPC Meeting Minutes - Formatted pdf (19978 : August 19, 2021 CCPC Meeting Minutes) August 19, 2021 Page 23 of 72 that pretty much any -- you know, is that just what's required by code, or have you gone beyond what's required by code? MR. YOVANOVICH: The Type B buffer is the code-required Type B buffer. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Okay. So in this case, it appears as though code actually addresses the issue that, of course, people would have, and whether it addresses it exactly how neighbors -- you know, of course, we'd all like to have really big, tall trees immediately, you know, to get rid of the -- you know, the sightlines, to block the sightlines. MR. YOVANOVICH: Sure. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: But in this case, the code actually will cause that to happen over time, and that's what's reasonable, and that's what the code demands of developers. MR. YOVANOVICH: Right. And you know in Florida it all grows pretty quickly. So, it will -- you know, we're saying five years max. My guess, it will be probably quicker than that. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Thank you. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you. In approximately 15 minutes, we're going to take our mid-morning break. Having said that, Commissioner Schmitt. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Yes. Ken, shown on this diagram, just for edification, it appears, of course, that the site -- Soluna site, the base elevation is higher. I would assume that you are building to the current BFE requirements versus when the neighboring property was built. MR. GALLANDER: That's correct. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: What's the difference now; do you know? MR. GALLANDER: I do not know. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Jamie may know, but I have to assume since -- MR. GALLANDER: Ours is higher. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: -- since Canopy has been built, which probably back then was maybe, I don't know, in that part of the county, maybe eight feet above sea level, you're probably at least two foot higher requirement for BFE, base flood elevation; is that correct? MR. GALLANDER: I don't know. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: You don't know. MR. GALLANDER: I, unfortunately, can't say, but it sounds -- COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: I mean, the public needs to understand that the elevation's going to be higher, and it -- you sort of show that in the drawing, because it's -- the slab certainly reflects that it's higher than the neighboring property, but the requirement -- you have to meet the base flood elevation requirement. MR. GALLANDER: Absolutely. CHAIRMAN FRYER: We have Ms. Cook coming up to the microphone. She can, perhaps, answer that question. MS. COOK: Good morning. Jaime Cook, director of Development Review. When they get their South Florida Water Management District permit, the base flood elevation will be set at that point. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Okay. Well, Jaime, that's sort of true, but there's also requirements based on the flood maps. MS. COOK: Correct. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: But you're correct, the -- once they do the -- they go in for their ERP, Environmental Resource Permit, through the District, they'll get that requirement as well. Thank you. CHAIRMAN FRYER: We might have a second Jamie at the mic. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Another Jamie. MR. FRENCH: You can't go wrong with two Jamies. She's the better one, though. Very quickly. Joe, you're absolutely right. Jamie French, for the record. The BFE out in that area is -- and I didn't look at the map. I think it's set at about eight or nine feet. 5.A.a Packet Pg. 28 Attachment: 08-19-21CCPC Meeting Minutes - Formatted pdf (19978 : August 19, 2021 CCPC Meeting Minutes) August 19, 2021 Page 24 of 72 COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Yeah, it would have to believe. MR. FRENCH: If they do not seek that, the Florida Building Code has a requirement of one foot of freeboard on residential -- COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Yep. MR. FRENCH: -- nonetheless, and that's in the latest version of the Florida Building Code. But they'll come in, they'll set their elevations. As far as -- the maps will be updated based off of that, and they'll be required to work with staff and illustrate that they're above. But it will be above the current natural grade, no doubt. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: But -- and, of course, this is -- I'll go back to Ken again. This -- this portrays that you're going to try and keep as natural as possible that 15 feet, because you're obviously going to bring in fill in for the areas that you're going to be constructing homes on. But as Mr. Yovanovich -- as Rich stated, there will be some impact, but to minimize any impact on anything along that boundary and, of course, then you're going to put your preserve -- your buffer in, but -- which is fine. And then that certainly acts -- but you still have the requirement -- I know Jamie will verify this. But when you go for your ERP, you have to retain all your water or move your water as specified through the Environmental Resource Permit. You cannot drain to the neighboring property. MR. GALLANDER: That's correct. We understand that. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you. Commissioner Vernon, you're lit up again. Is that a false alarm? COMMISSIONER VERNON: No, if I light up, you don't call on me. If I don't light up, you call on me. So I think I've got some -- CHAIRMAN FRYER: I'm funny that way. COMMISSIONER VERNON: You are. Maybe it's something I said. Maybe it's my earlier vote. Actually, I just had, in a much less technical way, the same concern/question that Joe had. So -- and I think it's mostly been answered, but maybe just elaborate. If you're required to be higher than Soluna -- or the other -- to Canopy, then the natural thought I have is water's going to run off, and I think Joe addressed it, that that's not going to occur because -- but just elaborate in plain terms for me how they're going to be protected from water runoff. MR. YOVANOVICH: Just so you know the exhibit you see in front of you where it says FFE equals 17.5 feet, we're in for our ERP permit, and hopefully we'll be issued shortly, because we have our plat running concurrently. So in a technical sense, Joel designs the water management system to assure that we keep all of our water that's currently on that site on our site. So even though it looks like we're higher, the system is designed to make sure the water does not flow off of our property onto neighbors' property. Now, he can come and show you the calculations and how that works, and we could probably show you an exhibit, but that's -- we go through a very detailed review through the Water Management District ERP permit process to assure our water does not go off onto our neighbors. COMMISSIONER VERNON: Yeah. That's what I wanted. I wanted a practical response. I don't need the technical. Thank you. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Commissioner Klucik. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Thank you, Mr. Chairman. The 17.5 FFE compares to the 15.4 Canopy FFE. I'm just trying to figure out, does that mean anything? Because I was thinking, then, the difference is 2.1 feet. But is that too simplistic? It's not necessarily? MR. GALLANDER: For the record, Ken -- COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Okay. Because we talked a lot about it, and I'm, like, I'm third in line on the button here, and I'm, like, wait. It's right there. MR. KLATZKOW: There's also nothing you can do about it. 5.A.a Packet Pg. 29 Attachment: 08-19-21CCPC Meeting Minutes - Formatted pdf (19978 : August 19, 2021 CCPC Meeting Minutes) August 19, 2021 Page 25 of 72 COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Pardon? MR. KLATZKOW: There's nothing you can do about it. I mean, it's -- it's outside -- it's outside the county's purviews. They'll go for their permit. They'll get their permit. Hopefully the water's retained. If the water's not retained, well, that's life. It's just outside your purview, this issue. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Anything else, Commissioner Klucik? COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: No, thank you. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Commissioner Shea. COMMISSIONER SHEA: Just more of an education for me. Obviously, you say water is not going to leave the property, but you're designing it under a condition. What is the condition? A 100-year condition? A 50-year? Because it will -- there will be an event that it will leave the property. I'm just wondering what the condition is. MR. YOVANOVICH: Fair question. I'm going to actually ask the engineer to give you that. I think it's a hundred-year, but I don't want to mis -- COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: It's a hundred-year, hundred-year event. MR. BLIKSTAD: Rich knows more than he's willing to admit. But, yes, it is a hundred-year that this system is designed to. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: That's the secret to his success. MR. YOVANOVICH: Not willing to admit anything. CHAIRMAN FRYER: No one else is signaling now, so continue, please, sir. MR. YOVANOVICH: I think that -- I already hit the highlights on the transportation during my presentation. We've asked for some deviations. Your county staff has supported those requested deviations. And with that, I think that concludes our presentation. Obviously, we'll answer any other questions you may have, but I think we've hit all the highlights. We hope you'll follow your staff's recommendation to recommend approval of our PUD to the Board of County Commissioners. And we're available to answer any further questions you may have regarding the project. CHAIRMAN FRYER: There appear to be none. Commissioner Fry. COMMISSIONER FRY: Rich, if the Planning Commission decided that a little bit beefier buffer was needed -- we haven't heard public speakers yet to understand where they stand on this and what evidence they have. If that request was made, are you prepared to offer anything at this point? MR. YOVANOVICH: Of course. Do you want me to offer it now? COMMISSIONER FRY: Sure. MR. YOVANOVICH: We have talked about -- there's a gap right here at planting. We talked about acquiring some trees that are tall enough to be planted at that sightline (indicating) at planting. COMMISSIONER FRY: Meaning more mature trees. MR. YOVANOVICH: Taller, I guess mature, whatever. The answer is, yes, we can fill that gap in if we need to. I'm not sure it's worth that extra expense, but if that's, you know, what will give the residents of Canopy more level of comfort and the Planning Commission a level of comfort, then we can plant it taller to hit the sightline now and not wait a couple years for growth to get to the bottom part of the sightline. COMMISSIONER FRY: I think that's good to know now before the public speakers speak, because at least we can ask them if that would assuage their concerns. So thank you. MR. YOVANOVICH: You're welcome. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you. Commissioner Schmitt? COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Not me. COMMISSIONER VERNON: There you go. MR. YOVANOVICH: Is it you this time? 5.A.a Packet Pg. 30 Attachment: 08-19-21CCPC Meeting Minutes - Formatted pdf (19978 : August 19, 2021 CCPC Meeting Minutes) August 19, 2021 Page 26 of 72 COMMISSIONER SHEA: It must have been Chris. COMMISSIONER VERNON: It was me. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Before you speak, Commissioner, I'm going to ask Mr. Troy Miller during the upcoming break if he would check on this system, because we seem to get some false positives on the deliberator. Go ahead, Commissioner. COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: That's Joe's seat. COMMISSIONER VERNON: Oh, is that what it is? COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: It's got my name on there. COMMISSIONER VERNON: How many units in Soluna are going to be along the west side excluding the part that faces Tree Farm or that's next to Tree Farm? MR. YOVANOVICH: On the west side? COMMISSIONER VERNON: On the west side, yeah, running along that track that's against the Canopy. MR. YOVANOVICH: I just want to make sure, so we're talking the same language, from this corner to that corner? COMMISSIONER VERNON: Not even that. Just to the corner of Canopy. MR. YOVANOVICH: So from here down? COMMISSIONER VERNON: Yep, exactly. Units. MR. YOVANOVICH: My client -- it's 120 feet. My client says there's six units in that area. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Other questions or comments? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: No one is lit up on the deliberator. It's 23 minutes after 10:00. Unless the Commission feels otherwise, I think we should start our break now, go for 15 minutes. MR. YOVANOVICH: It may -- before. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Oh, sure. MR. YOVANOVICH: Wayne just said to me there will be a maximum of two buildings in that row, which would be 12, but it's going to be between six and 12 in that area, not 18 that the audience just said. So in that area, six to 10, where the R is. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Mr. Chairman? CHAIRMAN FRYER: Yes, sir. Go ahead, Commissioner. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Real quick question on the deviation. The sidewalk deviation, which parts will end up that should have sidewalks without the deviation, which areas would then not have sidewalks under your request? MR. GALLANDER: That would be the portion along the southern boundary since there's no residential or the R on this side. So the sidewalks are only in relation and adjacent to where there's a residential tract or the amenity tract. So it's really -- it's going to be this portion there. This Deviation 3 symbol on this, that is that reference point for you. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Great. Thank you. MR. GALLANDER: Yes, sir. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Without objection, then, we'll stand in recess until 10:40. That's 15 minutes from now. Thank you. (A brief recess was had from 10:25 a.m. to 10:39 a.m.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: Ladies and gentlemen, let's return. It's 10:40. Mr. Yovanovich, do you have anything further, sir? MR. YOVANOVICH: No. We've concluded. I didn't know if there were any further questions of us. If not, I think staff goes next. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Well, we'll find out. Are there any further questions from the Planning Commission of the applicant? (No response.) 5.A.a Packet Pg. 31 Attachment: 08-19-21CCPC Meeting Minutes - Formatted pdf (19978 : August 19, 2021 CCPC Meeting Minutes) August 19, 2021 Page 27 of 72 CHAIRMAN FRYER: Apparently not. Ready for staff report. Mr. Bellows. MR. BELLOWS: Yes. For the record, Ray Bellows. I've been working with Mr. Finn on this project, and it's my pleasure to present it to you today. We are rezoning 18.5 acres from ag to Residential Planned Unit Development. As noted in your staff report, staff has found it consistent with the Growth Management Plan. And the listed deviations that were reviewed by staff, they are found not to have any health or safety issues, and we are recommending approval of those deviations. And I'd be happy to answer any questions. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: I have one question. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Commissioner Schmitt. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Yeah. Ray, would you just highlight -- CHAIRMAN FRYER: Actually, that's out of the sequence. I didn't look over here. Commissioner Klucik is first. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Well -- and mine is real brief. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Go ahead. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: And everyone saw it. I just want to disclose that I was speaking with the residents who are here, so that's a disclosure -- CHAIRMAN FRYER: Understood. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: -- communication. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you, sir. Commissioner Fry. COMMISSIONER FRY: Mr. Bellows, I'm just curious, the residential infill bonus of three dwelling units per acre, what's -- just explain in laymen's terms the purpose of it and how the number three was arrived at. MR. BOSI: The logic behind the infill bonus is you've got empty property that development has -- has been placed around it. You have a wide availability of infrastructure. Because of that, those are the properties we would want to see to be added to the property tax layer, to be added to the active land-use layer. So we want to promote -- we want to incentivize development from taking advantage of areas that have that full complement of infrastructure availability. So, therefore, to promote activity, we reward it with an additional three units per acre. And we've utilized that also to help augment the demand that's associated with the Rural Fringe Mixed-Use District to be able to -- and it requires that the first unit for that infill -- that infill three units per acre has to come from a TDR. So it augments the demand for TDRs, so people who have had their development rights restricted within the sending area have opportunities to be made whole. COMMISSIONER FRY: I have not heard density being an issue raised in this project, but I'm curious if that number of three, the bonus of three has ever been adjudicated downward by the Planning Commission or the -- CHAIRMAN FRYER: I want to interject first, and then, Mr. Bosi, please answer the question. It's my understanding that that is a discretionary bonus; am I correct? MR. BOSI: Oh, yes, yes. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Okay. I just wanted to be sure everybody understands that this is not obligatory on us. It's discretionary. MR. BOSI: Any rezoning that's in front of you, you have the ability to limit the density based upon the safety concerns -- healthy, safety, welfare issues that you may perceive within that individual project. COMMISSIONER FRY: So I guess my question is still, it's discretionary, as Chairman Fryer said. How often have you, Mr. Bellows, staff, seen it adjudicated downward by the Planning Commission or the Board of County Commissioners? MR. BELLOWS: For the record, Ray Bellows. There are many rezone applications that take advantage of various density bonus provisions. There's another one called a density band that surrounds our activity centers. That's 5.A.a Packet Pg. 32 Attachment: 08-19-21CCPC Meeting Minutes - Formatted pdf (19978 : August 19, 2021 CCPC Meeting Minutes) August 19, 2021 Page 28 of 72 another one where you get three additional eligible bonus over the base of four for seven, kind of like this. And there have been many cases where they've asked for seven and we -- or the staff or the Planning Commission has, based on those site-specific conditions, recommended less. COMMISSIONER FRY: So here's -- the last question is very much of a laymen's question. But why -- I know there's residential surrounding this area, and this is the last parcel to complete a fully residential block of land. Why is the bonus only for residential? Why would you not also want to consider commercial in an area like that to serve the residential communities? MR. BOSI: The bonus is designed to add/incentivize for residentially -- for properties that want to seek residential use. Now, if they wanted a commercial aspect within their residential component, they would have to request a mixed-use -- a mixed-use PUD, and they would have to -- it would have to be in compliance with the commercial allocation of the Growth Management Plan in terms of where we allocate it as appropriate. This isn't an area that has been designed or allocated by Future Land Use Map for commercial development. It is urban residential. So based upon that designation, commercial's not a use that we encounter or that we would contemplate related to incentivizing further -- from a residential perspective. COMMISSIONER FRY: Okay. Thank you. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you. Commissioner Shea. COMMISSIONER SHEA: Just more educational questions. If this is 22 acres, would they be allowed to do this? Is there something magical about the 20-acre -- being less than 20 acres? MR. BOSI: Other than that's the cutoff point that we -- that we've established for the infill bonus provision. COMMISSIONER SHEA: So they wouldn't be able to do this if they were two acres bigger? MR. BOSI: Correct. COMMISSIONER SHEA: Okay. So what they're -- if they just built without having to come here for a rezone, they could put four dwelling units per acre? MR. BOSI: No. The current zoning designation is agricultural. They could put one unit per five acres. COMMISSIONER SHEA: One per five acres. So we're actually going -- okay. But they're proposing going to seven, and in exchange they're going to give us -- CHAIRMAN FRYER: I'm sorry, but the current zoning is A, but under the GMP it's anticipated that it's going to be urban infill. COMMISSIONER SHEA: Urban infill, which is four, right? MR. BOSI: Yes. COMMISSIONER SHEA: So they could come in -- MR. BOSI: The land-use allocation -- the future land-use allocation is a base of four units per acre. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: And the basis -- MR. BELLOWS: And that's a base density. There are ways to get additional through bonuses. This is one way. Affordable housing is another way. COMMISSIONER SHEA: You can go through affordable housing or this. So in exchange for going from four to seven, they're going to conserve 18 acres in the rural fringe area somewheres? MR. BOSI: Well, they have purchased -- they have purchased 18 TDRs. Those 18 TDRs convert to 80 acres of sending lands. COMMISSIONER SHEA: Okay. COMMISSIONER FRY: Eighty or 90? Isn't it five acres per TDR? MR. BOSI: Five. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you. Commissioner -- 5.A.a Packet Pg. 33 Attachment: 08-19-21CCPC Meeting Minutes - Formatted pdf (19978 : August 19, 2021 CCPC Meeting Minutes) August 19, 2021 Page 29 of 72 COMMISSIONER SHEA: Yeah. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Sorry. COMMISSIONER SHEA: I'm just trying to -- it seems like a pretty reasonable exchange. MR. BOSI: Yes. COMMISSIONER SHEA: Thank you. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Commissioner Schmitt. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Both lines of question were exactly what I was going to ask Ray to clarify. Certainly I know the issue, but I want to make sure both the public and my colleagues understand. But also understand the incentive here -- if you recall, we had two programs -- for my colleagues. We had the Rural Fringe Mixed-Use District and the Rural Lands Stewardship Area; two areas where we had initiatives to preserve certain areas of the county that were deemed to be areas we wanted to protect, and part of this problem was -- well, part of the issue here is the incentive of compensating landowners in the Rural Fringe Mixed-Use District because now we have an applicant that is going to pay someone for the TDRs that they've had on the market probably for 20 years, I have to assume, since it started. And they're going to be compensated for land that has been identified as land that no longer can be developed, but it still had development rights, and now they're transferring those rights through TDRs. So it's a win-win. Frankly, it's a win-win for the infill. The density may not be deemed a win-win, but it's a win -- because the infill is being constructed based on our Future Land Use Map because this is an area -- or a tract that was identified for residential. But the real win is the property owners that have these rural fringe -- or these TDRs on the market. Now, all the county does, is my understanding -- could you clarify -- you just monitor the TDR bank. You're not the banker. You just monitor the transfer of the TDRs. MR. BOSI: Mike Bosi, Planning and Zoning director. We are not a TDR bank. We are the -- kind of the commodity exchange. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Commodity exchange, yeah. MR. BOSI: We make sure the transfers are provided for within the proper fashion. We have a set -- minimum set price tag for what the base credits can be exchanged for. We maintain the existing inventory of TDRs that have been issued, when they've been expenditured, when they've been extinguished. But we are just -- we provide the exchange. We do not provide a banking account. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Thanks. So but -- and this is clearly in compliance with all the requirements for an infill and for the density bonus associated with it? MR. BOSI: Correct. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Okay. Thanks. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you. Commissioner Klucik. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: And for clarification -- I'm not sure if this is our planning staff or our attorney or maybe even both, maybe even some of you could set me straight on this. But just to confirm or clarify, you mentioned the health, safety, and welfare issues could be a reason for both the deviations as well as the bonus to recommend disapproval. Am I -- you know, is it implied and is it actually the case that if we don't identify something specific as to health, safety, and welfare that we wouldn't be in a position to deny those requests? MR. KLATZKOW: You need a rationale -- COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: In other words, if we don't find a -- MR. KLATZKOW: You need a rational basis -- COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: To say no? MR. KLATZKOW: -- to say no. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: And those are traditionally ones that we use, because those are obviously a good -- you know, if there was a health issue caused by one of the deviations, then that would be a rational basis. 5.A.a Packet Pg. 34 Attachment: 08-19-21CCPC Meeting Minutes - Formatted pdf (19978 : August 19, 2021 CCPC Meeting Minutes) August 19, 2021 Page 30 of 72 MR. KLATZKOW: Yes, sir. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: And at this point, we haven't -- the staff has not found a rational basis. MR. BELLOWS: We haven't identified any. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Okay. And to be honest with you, that's kind of a cue to the fine people that -- you know, that do live in Canopy that are here that I spoke with during our break. That's a cue to you that that would be what you need to find and what you need to be arguing. You know, in my -- you know, I'm not an expert on it, but to me, you know, from our discussion right here, you have to have some rational basis and those health, safety, and welfare concerns are -- in the past have always been something that we can use as a rational basis to deny a petition like this. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you, sir. Anything else from the Planning Commission for staff? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: Anything else from staff? MR. BELLOWS: That's it. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you very much. Therefore, it brings us to the time for public comment. What -- Mr. Youngblood, what do we have and from whom? MR. YOUNGBLOOD: Mr. Chairman, we have five registered speakers for this item. Two of them are present with us, three of them are online. We will start with Steve Shambo followed by Kristen Petry. MR. SHAMBO: I was going to defer to him. CHAIRMAN FRYER: All right. Did the first waive off? MR. SHAMBO: He has all my concerns. Yes, I give it to him. CHAIRMAN FRYER: All right. So the first speaker's not going to be speaking. So the second speaker, please approach the podium. MR. YOUNGBLOOD: Kristen Petry. MS. PETRY: So I'm with the client here on this side, so I don't know how that got -- CHAIRMAN FRYER: Can you come up to the microphone and let us know. It doesn't matter who you're representing if you're a member of the public and you want to speak. MR. YOVANOVICH: She's my landscape consultant. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Okay. MR. YOVANOVICH: So I think she just got -- CHAIRMAN FRYER: Okay. All right. MR. YOVANOVICH: -- listed as a public speaker, but she's not a public speaker. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you. Understood. Do we now go to the videotape -- go to the Zoom? MR. YOUNGBLOOD: Yes, Mr. Chairman. Ken Dechman is our first speaker. CHAIRMAN FRYER: All right. Mr. Dechman, are you on, sir? MR. YOUNGBLOOD: Give me just one moment here. CHAIRMAN FRYER: All right. We need to unmute on the speaker end, please, sir. MR. YOUNGBLOOD: All right. Mr. Dechman, are you with us? MR. DECHMAN: Yes. Are you able to hear me now? CHAIRMAN FRYER: Yes. Please proceed. MR. DECHMAN: Yeah, this is Ken Dechman. I'm a resident in Canopy. There are a number of issues here. I just want to briefly speak about one issue regarding the NIM that was discussed earlier. There were extremely few of us in the community here who were notified of the NIM in the first place, and the same occurred for this meeting today. In fact, our community was notified probably fourthhand for today's meeting. There was one letter that went to one of our residents here who shared it with me, and then I e-mailed it to the board, who then sent it out. 5.A.a Packet Pg. 35 Attachment: 08-19-21CCPC Meeting Minutes - Formatted pdf (19978 : August 19, 2021 CCPC Meeting Minutes) August 19, 2021 Page 31 of 72 We did not have enough time to plan to attend these meetings. I believe there would be many more of us in attendance had the proper notice been given. In my opinion, it wasn't proper notice. I think we're the community that's most affected by this development, and yet even those of us who attended the NIM, which I did, I did not receive notice about this meeting except for secondhand. I don't know if that could be addressed in the future. To me, it just seems improper. And I'll mute. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Well, we'll address it right now, sir. Mr. Bellows. MR. BELLOWS: Yeah. For the record, Ray Bellows. I pulled up the advertising information that was part of your packet. We did do a mailed notice to property owners pursuant to the Land Development Code, and that was to those registered with the Property Appraiser's Office. We also posted signage on any part of the PUD boundary that has a street frontage, and we also posted -- or a newspaper ad. CHAIRMAN FRYER: And that's notice to 500 people? MR. BELLOWS: Five hundred feet in the urban area. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Five hundred feet. MR. BELLOWS: A thousand feet in the rural. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Okay. Thank you. Commissioner Schmitt. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Thank you. Yes, Ray, to clarify, that's 500 feet from the boundary. MR. BELLOWS: Correct. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Into the neighboring properties. MR. BELLOWS: And we used the Property Appraiser's lists. So if somebody's renting, they may not get the notice. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Let me pass this question to Mr. Dechman. You live where? CHAIRMAN FRYER: Mr. Dechman, are you still with us, sir? MR. DECHMAN: I'm still here. I live on Canopy Circle. I did not receive notice. I've lived here four years, and I'm a registered taxpayer here. I only know of one neighbor who lives here who received notice in our community. There may be others, but I know that it's -- the majority of those neighbors that I spoke with who are registered permanent full-time residents here in Collier County received no notice. It may have been posts, but as you mentioned before, those signs are very difficult to read unless you actually walk out and go to them. But I had one neighbor who received notice, and when I made a copy of that and e-mailed it to our board president, he indicated that he had also not been contacted. I would at least think that the members of our board would have been notified of these meetings, but apparently they were not. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Let me follow up, then, with the staff or with the petitioner. Ray, staff verified that letter notice went out? MR. BELLOWS: Yes. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: How many letters went out? MR. BELLOWS: I have to look it up. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: And based on the property records, and that is the applicant's responsibility based on the property records. They will do, in assistance, typically, with the staff, if I'm not mistaken, you -- MR. BELLOWS: Planning Commission advertising, we do -- we contact our graphic's staff, and they provide us a map and a list of property owners. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: But the applicant actually sends out the letter? MR. BELLOWS: Only for the NIM. 5.A.a Packet Pg. 36 Attachment: 08-19-21CCPC Meeting Minutes - Formatted pdf (19978 : August 19, 2021 CCPC Meeting Minutes) August 19, 2021 Page 32 of 72 COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Only for the NIM. You actually send the letters for the Planning Commission? MR. BELLOWS: Planning Commission. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Okay. I was not clear on that. I forgot that. So -- but the -- so based on the registered addresses in the Property Appraiser's website, which has got to be the most accurate -- MR. BELLOWS: Yes. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: -- within 500 feet, which is basically through a GIS process, you're sending every homeowner within 500 feet of the property a letter advising them of the meeting? MR. BELLOWS: Yes. We work with a company that does the mailing for us. We provide the letter that's part of the -- goes in the envelope, but the mailing company gets the list from the county that we work with our GIS staff to -- from Property Appraiser records and GIS, and they -- COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: So if a -- if a homeowner is not living here full time -- and that's the postal service and forwarding of mail, whatever. MR. BELLOWS: Yes. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: But the notices were sent? MR. BELLOWS: Yes. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Okay. Thank you. COMMISSIONER SHEA: I think the key is 500 feet. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Five hundred feet. COMMISSIONER SHEA: It's probably outside of 500 feet. That's why he didn't get it and others did. CHAIRMAN FRYER: I think it's worth mentioning that we have had before us -- and I think it's -- I'm not sure where it is now in the proceedings, but I believe we have taken action to recommend expanding that number to what -- it was at least 1,000 feet if not more. MR. BELLOWS: Well, there's a proposed LDC amendment. That's Estates zoning though, one mile. MR. BOSI: The Estates zoning has been increased to one mile, but the other notification areas within the rural communities have not been extended beyond that one mile. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Sometime I thought we had taken recommendatory action on everything, but not -- COMMISSIONER VERNON: I thought we did, too. COMMISSIONER SHEA: It was related to the Estates when we were doing the RLSA villages out there, because we weren't reaching enough of the neighbors because of the size of the lots. That gets to the Estates side. CHAIRMAN FRYER: It sounds to me like this, that the current ordinance was satisfied with respect to sending of notice. MR. BELLOWS: Yes. And I do have some additional information. There were 126 letters that went out based on the 500-foot measurement. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Okay. But this points out, again, at least for me, the advisability of us taking another look at the reach of these notifications for the entire county because it's -- it seems to me that if all of Canopy didn't get notification, then our ordinance falls short of what it should say. Now, that doesn't -- that doesn't change anything with respect to this application because it complied with the ordinances. But we're the Planning Commission, and I think we need to look at that and consider whether we want to recommend a broader reach. Commissioner Klucik. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Yes, thank you, Mr. Chairman. Just, you know, Google Maps allows you to do a distance, and I'm just swinging a radius of 500 feet from, you know, the corner, and it seems like, you know, maybe half of the -- not even 5.A.a Packet Pg. 37 Attachment: 08-19-21CCPC Meeting Minutes - Formatted pdf (19978 : August 19, 2021 CCPC Meeting Minutes) August 19, 2021 Page 33 of 72 half of the homes in Canopy would have been, you know, within 500 feet. And so I guess I'm thinking that, you know, that might be why; I'm not sure. So if you were on the easternmost portion of the Canopy Circle, the eastern half, you more than likely got -- than not got a notice. And then, obviously, there's other communities that are near by and that's -- that might be why. And I'm not -- you know, I don't know. But I don't -- I don't doubt that our staff did it, but I certainly think that the -- if you look at the people that seem to be most affected, you know, it's going to be those people. You know, all of those houses that are near the buffer, they all definitely got -- you know, got notice, you know, unless -- unless we're hearing inaccurate information, you know, from our staff, and -- you know, and I guess if Mr. Dechman, you know, lives in that area where it butts up against that wall, then he would -- you know, he can, you know, testify that he didn't -- has told us that he didn't get it. I'm not sure where he lives, but it seems as though we followed the code. CHAIRMAN FRYER: All right. Thank you. Mr. Dechman, anything further from you, sir? MR. DECHMAN: No. I would just say that my property does not go up against the wall, but I may be half a dozen houses from there, so I'm actually very close to this community. So if I'm outside of that zone, then I think the county should readdress who is notified, because I'm within a line of sight of this development. So I feel like, at a minimum, I should have received notice. But my other point was that our HOA board should have received direct notice, and my understanding is that they did not, which is a -- a grave concern to me. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Go ahead, Vice Chair. COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: The mailing did go to Canopy Neighborhood Association. There's a list right in our packet. It was mailed to them. And the other association, that was some letter we got that said there wasn't -- they didn't -- weren't notified, Mockingbird or something, they were also mailed. CHAIRMAN FRYER: The association? COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: Yep. Sent to the management companies. CHAIRMAN FRYER: I happen to agree with the sentiment of Mr. Dechman. I think we need to revisit this for future applications, but for the current application it seems to me that the ordinance was complied with. Anybody else, questions for Mr. Dechman? Comment? Commissioner Fry. COMMISSIONER FRY: Mr. Dechman, I'm waiting for somebody from Canopy to elucidate your concerns with this development. Is that -- was that part of your presentation or simply concerns about the notice? MR. DECHMAN: I'll leave it to the rest of our community to address those. But I would just reemphasize the fact that even though you're saying that our board was sent notification, when I e-mailed our board president, he informed me that he had not received direct notice of it. I just wanted to make sure that I have that point made clear. But, otherwise, I'll defer to the other members of my community for the rest. CHAIRMAN FRYER: All right, sir. Thank you very much. Who's our next speaker? MR. YOUNGBLOOD: Mr. Chairman, our next speaker is Katrina Curran. Ms. Curran. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Ms. Curran, are you online? MR. CURRAN: That's my wife. Oh, okay. MS. CURRAN: Hello. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Yes, ma'am. We hear you, and you have the floor. MS. CURRAN: Yes, I apologize. So I wanted to address a couple of things that were brought up in my letter. My understanding is everybody thinks I'm specifically concerned about the view from the trees. That is not -- that is a concern, and to address with that, if -- we bought this land with a radio station 5.A.a Packet Pg. 38 Attachment: 08-19-21CCPC Meeting Minutes - Formatted pdf (19978 : August 19, 2021 CCPC Meeting Minutes) August 19, 2021 Page 34 of 72 behind it, okay. Nothing there. No plans for anything or anything to that sort. We knew Tree Farm was coming in. We knew Massey, and that's fine, but to have a dense 130 townhomes built right here was never on our radar. It was never said, and that's it. With that being said, I understand development is going to happen. So if you want to put a two-story house here, it's a two-story house; it is not 18 townhomes. There's a huge difference in that fact, you know. And if you look at my correspondence, I went over to D.R. Horton's other property, Meadowood, and if you look at the photos, that is what they are planning to put behind my house with those -- with that fence with that landscaping. Can you guys look at the photos or anything to see how Meadowood is set up? CHAIRMAN FRYER: If I may -- if I may try to address your question. The development standards limit the properties to be built to a zoned height of 30 feet and actual of 40, which I think is consistent with the neighboring properties. MS. CURRAN: Correct. I mean, I have a house two story next to me, and that's fine. But what I'm talking about is the dense population. If it's four single-family homes behind me two-story, that's fine, you know. My concern is the density of it. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Well, personally, I think your concern over density is a reasonable one and something that we need to think about. And, as you know, an infill density bonus, which is discretionary, is being requested in the amount of three additional DUAs. We will consider that carefully and be mindful of your comments. MS. CURRAN: Okay. So that's one thing. In regards to the wall issue, Mr. Gallander was correct. We don't have anything here, but that is on our developer, Neal Communities. Their original plans had for a fence along this property line and a wall along Tree Farm Road. And Neal community bailed on us. They did absolutely nothing about it. We had -- we tried to deal with them and negotiate it, and they refused to do anything. However, on the neighboring properties to Vanderbilt and Bristol, there's a wall. They -- I'm assuming they thought we had a preserve, and they just walked away from us. But I did have a fence along the east side of this property that went about, I want to say, eight or nine homes, and then they stopped it. The radio station has a fence, and that's where they went up to, and then they just left it. So they left our fence up to the radio station. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Commissioner Fry. Go ahead, Commissioner. MS. CURRAN: I'm sorry. What? COMMISSIONER FRY: Go ahead. I didn't mean to interrupt you. MS. CURRAN: No, no problem. So that's why we are mentioning it to D.R. Horton, because we were left high and dry by Neal Communities, so -- and that's where that's coming. And in regards to the type of wall that we want, in there -- our -- Soluna's request for deviation, Deviation No. 4 is they want to put a wall height of eight feet on the perimeter of the project on Tree Farm Road and allow 12-foot-tall wall/bedroom combination, but can't they bring that down along Canopy? You're already going to do it; you just continue it, okay. That's what I'm looking at. If they already requested a deviation on it, why not just continue it? CHAIRMAN FRYER: All right. Commissioner Fry has a question or a comment, ma'am. COMMISSIONER FRY: Ms. Curran -- MS. CURRAN: Sure. COMMISSIONER FRY: -- in your -- and I want to ask Ray if this is something we could put up on the screen. In the packet, page -- her letter, an e-mail thread. It starts on Page 147. But on Page 150 of the packet you have photos. MS. CURRAN: Yes. 5.A.a Packet Pg. 39 Attachment: 08-19-21CCPC Meeting Minutes - Formatted pdf (19978 : August 19, 2021 CCPC Meeting Minutes) August 19, 2021 Page 35 of 72 COMMISSIONER FRY: And I wanted to clarify what those photos are. MS. CURRAN: Sure. COMMISSIONER FRY: First of all, the top photo -- and Ray is attempting to put these photos up on the actualizer so we can see them. There are six homes shown that are part of Canopy along that border. Which home are you? MS. CURRAN: Okay. COMMISSIONER FRY: Are you one of the homes? MS. CURRAN: Yeah. I'm lot number -- or house -- the No. 56, that's me. That one. COMMISSIONER FRY: Okay. The one that's slightly diagonal. MS. CURRAN: Yes. COMMISSIONER FRY: The next picture has a pink pipe and a picture of a fence. So clarify exactly what that picture is. MS. CURRAN: That is Meadowood. That's their development that they're building off of 951. That pink pipe is where the back of the townhome finishes. That is the fence that they have going up against Indigo Lakes, and that is what they are proposing to put behind their property here. COMMISSIONER FRY: And that distance from the pink pipe to the fence is, I believe -- MS. CURRAN: 23.7 feet. COMMISSIONER FRY: 23.7. Okay. So just to point out they're 30-some feet -- 37-and-a-half feet. So they're another 14 feet further back from that pink pipe in this development, and the other difference is that the buffer that you see at that fence is some low-lying hedges. You already have a buffer that's significantly beefier than that, and they're putting in a buffer that is beefier than that as well. So my question is, to what extent can you actually see through your buffer once they -- when they put their homes in and they have an immature buffer in on their side, are you -- is it your position that the homes -- the second story of the townhomes over there will be able to easily see through their buffer and your buffer into the backyards of your homes? MS. CURRAN: Let me -- can we go back to the photo that he took of the property, that Mr. Gallander took of the property when he was here. Because I will explain to you -- because that's actually my backyard. COMMISSIONER FRY: Are you able to see what we're seeing on the screen from where you are? MS. CURRAN: Yeah, I see this right now. So he's standing in my backyard. Those hedges in front get cut down to five feet. Right now they're just overgrown. So basing that as a buffer is irrelevant. Behind that is palm trees, and a couple feet behind that is the property line. All of that tall stuff you see behind there and behind those palm trees are almost going to get torn down. We asked him to leave the pine trees, and he was like, well, we'll see what we can do. But a majority of that's going to get torn down. Some of it is invasive species. Fine. I get that. But what you guys see is not going to remain. That is one of the issues. It will not be there. And we have gone to the property line of Canopy and to where that fence is from that radio station, and that is 38.7 feet, and where that fence is with the radio station is where the back of the townhome will be according to their sightline drawings of 38.7 feet. That will not be there. COMMISSIONER FRY: Okay. The last two photos you have, one is a -- it's a lot with some, you know, wood construction, kind of a cleared lot, and then a few feet to a fence. What is that exactly? MS. CURRAN: That's Meadowood. COMMISSIONER FRY: That's Meadowood again. So that's under construction. And then the final photo is finished townhomes looking at a fence and another development. What is that? MS. CURRAN: That's Meadowood. 5.A.a Packet Pg. 40 Attachment: 08-19-21CCPC Meeting Minutes - Formatted pdf (19978 : August 19, 2021 CCPC Meeting Minutes) August 19, 2021 Page 36 of 72 COMMISSIONER FRY: Meadowood also. MS. CURRAN: These are all Meadowood, yes. COMMISSIONER FRY: Yeah. Ray is putting those up now. I just want to be clear on what these exhibits are. So it's your -- it is your statement that a second-story townhome would easily be able to see through your buffer and whatever they put in into your backyards? MS. CURRAN: Correct. COMMISSIONER FRY: You also had an issue about screening of air conditioners units, and I think hearing those things humming and all that. Is that also an issue remaining for you? MS. CURRAN: Correct. Because as you can see, you can see where the air conditionings are, right there, and my bedroom is right there on the other side of that. COMMISSIONER FRY: Okay. The other issue I remember from your letter and others from the NIM were concerns about traffic getting out onto Tree Farm Road out of your exit and how this additional traffic would make that more difficult. So what is -- what is an update on that? And just give us more information. MS. CURRAN: Correct, as their attorney was explaining that Woodcrest and Massey going through Vanderbilt and Tree Farm, that is correct; it's been there set up a long time; however, the development that has occurred on Immokalee Road in the last several years is going to outweigh that capacity that side bypass will be able to handle. On the corner of Collier and Immokalee, we're building 400 apartments. You go further down Immokalee, there's another 850-home development coming up, and there's more developments coming up that way. And Immokalee right now is the main corridor from out Ave Maria and toward to the interstate. So people will be turning down Massey and Woodcrest at an increased volume. And the traffic study, unfortunately, does not allow for five years in the future or even what's coming in right now. So that is my concern. COMMISSIONER FRY: What is your experience currently getting out onto Tree Farm? I assume you're turning west on Tree Farm is where you're experiencing potential delays? MS. CURRAN: Yes, especially during season when we're trying to make that left to get on it, and it becomes a little bit difficult sometimes to get out there. COMMISSIONER FRY: All times of day or specifically in the afternoon? MS. CURRAN: During rush hour. COMMISSIONER FRY: Okay. MS. CURRAN: The morning rush hour and coming home, and people go speeding down that road quite frequently. COMMISSIONER FRY: Okay. Thank you. Commissioner Schmitt. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Yes. Can you clarify the issue with the fence? You're basically saying your developer -- and you believe your -- the PUD documents, the Planned Unit Development documents for your development required the developer to put up a wall, and they left and did not put up a wall; is that your position? MS. CURRAN: Well, their original plans had that stuff in it, and then I guess plans, obviously, develop and change, and in their final one it was not there anymore. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Okay. But I don't understand. Well, I understand exactly what you're saying, but there's perception of what you thought the developer was supposed to do and what -- the PUD requirement. Let me turn to staff, Ray or Mike, what -- what were the requirements for Canopy? Because it's residential abutting ag. There's no requirement for a wall. MR. BELLOWS: Correct. MS. CURRAN: Correct. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: All they put up was a chain-link fence to delineate the property. Who put up the chain-link fence; Canopy or the radio station? 5.A.a Packet Pg. 41 Attachment: 08-19-21CCPC Meeting Minutes - Formatted pdf (19978 : August 19, 2021 CCPC Meeting Minutes) August 19, 2021 Page 37 of 72 MS. CURRAN: It's the radio station's. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Okay. So they fenced off their property, so -- MS. CURRAN: Yeah. So when I'm -- COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: You're saying that your developer -- or someone told you or it was a belief on your part that a wall was supposed to be constructed there? MS. CURRAN: Yeah. I mean, according to the original plans that were submitted to the county, it had a wall there and it had a fence there, but by the time they got done -- they changed it before the actual development came forward. They changed the plans and removed it. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Okay. MS. CURRAN: It was there, and then it wasn't there. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: All right. I'm sorry for the questions, but I'm trying to understand. You -- it's your position that there was a plan submitted and approved that a wall was going to be constructed. MS. CURRAN: Correct. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Let me ask staff. Was there a plan submitted that you know of that required a wall to be constructed, and did they come in to amend it to not construct the wall? MR. BELLOWS: I was just going to pull up the PUD to see what the language was. There might have been one time a proposal to have a perimeter wall, but it isn't required -- COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: It's not required. MR. BELLOWS: -- to have it against an agricultural rezoned parcel. MR. KLATZKOW: No. The issue is, what was approved by the Board? Because they weren't selling houses until the PUD was approved. So what does the PUD say? COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: What does the PUD say? MR. BELLOWS: I'm opening it up now. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: The second question is, this is residential abutting residential. So in accordance to with the Land Development Code, there is no wall required, just a buffer between residential buffer -- adjacent to residential. So it's basically Canopy's position that whether it was required or not, the wall was never constructed, but now you're saying you believe that it's now the -- this petitioner's responsibility to put up a wall since your developer did not; is that your position? MS. CURRAN: No. I'm not saying that it's their responsibility because our developer did not. It's their responsibility because they are putting something in there. The existing fence is being torn down. Look, I don't care what's behind it, because it's a radio station that's there. But I have to look at it as a safety standpoint. If there is nothing there, there is open property between Soluna and us; nothing stopping anybody from trespassing between the two properties. We have young children here. Who's to say a child cannot go into the construction site? Who's to say a construction worker can't come onto my property? That is the issue. There is nothing stopping anything from happening between these two properties if we leave it completely open. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: I understand. What the petitioner's offering, what, to put up a chain -- to replace the chain-link fence, or no fence? MR. YOVANOVICH: Am I allowed up? Can I come up? COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Yes, please. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Go ahead. MR. BELLOWS: I put up on the screen the master plan that shows the adjacent project, Buttonwood Preserve, where the wall is optional, listed on the master plan as optional. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: And that's what was approved by the county. It was optional? MR. BELLOWS: Correct. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: A fence or a wall. 5.A.a Packet Pg. 42 Attachment: 08-19-21CCPC Meeting Minutes - Formatted pdf (19978 : August 19, 2021 CCPC Meeting Minutes) August 19, 2021 Page 38 of 72 MS. CURRAN: Yes. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Okay. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Mr. Yovanovich? COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: If it was going to be commercial, there would be a wall required, typically -- MR. BELLOWS: Correct. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: -- or sufficient buffer. But in this case it was residential. No wall required. A fence could be approved. So there was no requirement -- it was either/or. MR. BELLOWS: That's correct. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Okay. Thank you. MS. CURRAN: Yeah. So they chose the "or," not doing it. That's what I'm saying. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Mr. Yovanovich. MR. YOVANOVICH: If I can, I've put the survey of the property up just so we can get a better idea. I think what she's talking about is the fence you can see on the survey that surrounds the existing antennas, okay. We intend to put our own vinyl-coated chain-link fence on our property on the western property line or in the vicinity of the property line putting in a chain-link fence on our property. That will be part of our development. We are not going to put in a wall along that property line. It's hard enough -- I don't think it's legal nor is it fair to require us to put a wall in that was an option for a previous developer on a different piece of property to address those concerns. But we are addressing the concerns by putting in a vinyl-coated chain-link fence on our property. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: And the fence will be constructed when? MR. EVERETT: As soon as feasible. MR. YOVANOVICH: As part of the initial site work. MR. EVERETT: We can agree to that. MR. YOVANOVICH: We can agree to do it as part of the initial site work as part of the -- as we move forward. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Yeah. My position, I agree, that you're going to be doing site work. I mean, either -- some kind of a temporary fence until the permanent fence goes up. MR. YOVANOVICH: And we're happy to do that. But I need a -- first of all, let's make it clear that the code does not require -- COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Right, I understand. MR. YOVANOVICH: -- require any type of fence between neighbors. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Correct. MR. YOVANOVICH: And it seems a little odd to me that residential people can't get along with residential people; that we have to put in these boundaries to separate ourselves, but if -- we're going to do that. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: And then -- but the -- as far as Canopy, is Canopy a -- managed by a homeowners' association or is it a CDD? MR. YOVANOVICH: I have no idea about Canopy. MR. CURRAN: HOA, homeowners' association. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Okay. I know the -- it is a homeowners' association, just a response from the attendees here. So the HOA, if they chose to, they certainly could assess their property owners to put up a fence or a wall? MR. YOVANOVICH: I'm assuming they could, or the individual property owner could probably put a fence or wall on their property. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Yeah. It's an HOA issue that really -- I understand the issue. I certainly, you know, don't object to what is being presented, but it's not an issue of this zoning other than the fact that it is an issue that's been raised by the community, but it's not required. The LDC does not require it. And if it's an ongoing issue, I think the community has 5.A.a Packet Pg. 43 Attachment: 08-19-21CCPC Meeting Minutes - Formatted pdf (19978 : August 19, 2021 CCPC Meeting Minutes) August 19, 2021 Page 39 of 72 to, through its initiative, take action to put up a fence if they so choose. And I hate to be that blunt, but it's -- I don't know what in the code would require us to tell this developer to put up a wall. MR. BELLOWS: For the record, Ray Bellows. I agree. And I'm looking at -- COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: I wouldn't like it. I don't like the idea, but the fact of it is is I don't know what we can do about it. Go ahead. MR. BELLOWS: Yeah. And I'm looking at the Land Development Code for the landscape buffer requirements, and when Buttonwood Preserve went in, they were abutting agricultural zoned land. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Correct. MR. BELLOWS: The code requires that to be a Type A buffer, which is a 10-foot-width buffer but it doesn't include a hedge. When Soluna comes in, they're required, because they're now abutting residential, to come in with a Type B, which is 15 foot. That includes trees more closely centered, 25 feet on center, plus a hedge. Those are the minimum code requirements for compatibility between residential. MR. KLATZKOW: All right. Your density bonus. They're entitled to the four units, okay. The issue is the other three. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Correct. MR. KLATZKOW: The other three is a density bonus. And your LDC says that density bonuses are discretionary, not entitlements, and are dependent upon meeting the criteria for each bonus provision and compatibility with surrounding properties. If this board believes that the only way they can meet compatibility is with a wall, then you can require the wall, but that would be a finding. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: But I -- you understand that would be a ruling of this board, but under what justification? It's residential abutting residential. MR. KLATZKOW: You'd be saying in order to make -- it's sort of like the conditional-use process where we go through it and say, okay, what do we need to do to this property to make it compatible with the next property. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: I understand. MR. KLATZKOW: It's the same concept. CHAIRMAN FRYER: We've got Commissioner Klucik and Commissioner Vernon signaling. Gentlemen, are you both wanting to ask this witness questions? COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Yes. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Okay. Commissioner Klucik, you're first. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: So, ma'am, I guess I just wanted to point out or just ask, is the -- are the hedges that you're concerned about being trimmed back? I mean, it seems like from what I can see from the map, you know, in looking at the county appraiser's website and, you know, the GIS maps, that you actually own those trees, and maybe you could talk to your HOA if you have maintenances -- you know, lawn maintenances that's provided by your HOA or otherwise. Make sure that, you know, what you prefer to be a really dense buffer as far as vegetation, that -- you know, that you not trim it back, which seems to address one of your issues. It seems like you're in control of that, and that -- you know, that's part of, you know, you brought it up, so I'm just addressing that that seems like something you could fix from that one small slice of it. And the rest of it is -- it just seems like it's -- you know, we already heard, it's asking someone who's not responsible to put up a wall to put up a wall because other people failed the community by not doing what apparently they -- you know, they said they were going to do, but -- do you own that -- those bushes? MS. CURRAN: Yeah, and I'm not arguing that. That's fine. I get that they're there. That's not my issue. My issue is what's behind all that stuff that's going to get ripped down. That's what I'm talking about. And in all fairness, it's their property; they can do whatever they 5.A.a Packet Pg. 44 Attachment: 08-19-21CCPC Meeting Minutes - Formatted pdf (19978 : August 19, 2021 CCPC Meeting Minutes) August 19, 2021 Page 40 of 72 want with it. But I am just asking for some type of buffer and some kind of security. Don't put a wall, fine. But a fence would be nice for security measures. And if they want to put landscaping in, I request -- Mr. Yovanovich stated that they could put more mature bushes. That would work, too. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Okay. That's what they proposed. MS. CURRAN: Yep. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Okay. Anything else, Commissioner? COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: No. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Commissioner Vernon. COMMISSIONER VERNON: Ma'am, I just wanted to kind of confirm, kind of cut through the density, wall, traffic, terminology, and I'm trying to, in listening carefully to you, identify your concerns. Your first concern, I think, if I understood it, is noise; second concern, first floor, viewing concerns; third concern, traffic, rush-hour traffic and speeding; and then fourth concern is safety or trespassing both during construction and after it's built. Did I cover everything that -- I'm just trying to -- not trying to -- it's not even a question. I just want to make sure I covered your concerns. MS. CURRAN: Yes, but safety is more like No. 1. COMMISSIONER VERNON: Got it. Thank you. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you, Commissioner. Anyone else have questions or comments for this witness? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: If not, Ms. Curran, I believe we've been quite generous with you on time. But before I go on to the next speaker I want to be sure that you've covered all your issues. If you have anything new that we haven't heard from you about yet, please say it now. MS. CURRAN: My only real quick thing, when he was talking about the roads between Vanderbilt and stuff and you guys mentioned it at the beginning, about moving the preserve from one side to the other side. We do have neighboring communities, but they all have a huge amount of space between them. One of them has -- between us and Bristol 112 feet. Between us and Vanderbilt is, like, over 90 feet, you know. So it's a spacing issue. That's one of the things and, you know, I guess just repeating something. And then to backtrack a little bit -- I had to step out for a bit -- regarding the signage, whenever I drive on the road, I see a huge billboard on the side of the road advertising a public hearing for zoning changes. What they had on this property is a piece of paper in a plastic on a fence off of Massey Street. There was nothing posted on Tree Farm Road. So if anybody did not go down Massey and get out of their car and look at the sign on the fence, nobody knew about this unless you received direct mailing. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Let me ask staff on this question. You have pictures of all the signs posted, correct, Ray? And they were in the packet. CHAIRMAN FRYER: They're in the packet. MR. BELLOWS: Yeah, they're in the packet. I'm just trying to -- COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: And the proper signage was posted on Tree Farm and Massey? MR. BELLOWS: That's my understanding. MS. CURRAN: Where? Do you have a photo of Tree Farm? Because I've never seen it. MR. YOVANOVICH: I drove it yesterday. It was there. COMMISSIONER SHEA: I drove at the -- over the weekend, and both signs are there. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: That's what I thought. Because I go by there as well. CHAIRMAN FRYER: All right. Ms. Curran, I don't want to cut you off, but is there anything further that you that we haven't already heard? MR. CURRAN: No, that will be all. 5.A.a Packet Pg. 45 Attachment: 08-19-21CCPC Meeting Minutes - Formatted pdf (19978 : August 19, 2021 CCPC Meeting Minutes) August 19, 2021 Page 41 of 72 CHAIRMAN FRYER: All right. Thank you so much. Who's our next speaker, Mr. Youngblood? MR. YOUNGBLOOD: Mr. Chairman, our next speaker is Ted Treesh. MR. YOVANOVICH: He's with me. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Oh, okay. He's with the applicant, and I assume he does not want to speak as a member of the public; am I correct? MR. YOVANOVICH: No, sir, he does not want to speak as a member of the public. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you very much. Next speaker. MR. YOUNGBLOOD: My mistake. Our final speaker for this item is Richard Ceresa. Mr. Ceresa, are you with us, sir? MR. CERESA: Yes, I am. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Okay. Sir, we can hear you loud and clear. Please proceed. MR. CERESA: Okay. My main concern -- I live in Mockingbird Crossing. One item, we were not notified of the development coming in. I'm on the board of Mockingbird Crossing. But my main concern is Massey Street. I feel that Massey Street is unable to handle the current traffic load now, and with these improvements, we're going to end up having too much traffic. I know there's improvement to Massey in conjunction with Vanderbilt Road extension, but I think it's unrealistic for the county to consider Massey/Woodcrest a designated bypass. And I think it's unfair to the residents that live in this area. And that's my main issue. I don't think there's been enough planning put in -- and to have a two-lane road be designated as a bypass, and morning and evening we have solid traffic for two hours to two-and-a-half hours, people coming from Immokalee and people coming from Vanderbilt in the evening. And right now I counted at least five new developments east of Collier out Immokalee Road, and that's just going to add additional traffic that's going to impact the people that live in this area. And I think the traffic needs to somehow be moved down Immokalee, because those roads can handle it -- instead of using a two-lane farm road that will be improved shortly -- but it's still going to be a two-lane -- as a bypass. And that is a great concern, and it's going to impact the people that live in this area. And I think that the planning board needs to really look at that. And that's my main issue. CHAIRMAN FRYER: All right, sir. Thank you. MR. CERESA: Everything else, planning, you know, with the development, I don't see any issues that are going to impact us at Mockingbird Crossing except for the traffic. CHAIRMAN FRYER: All right, sir. Thank you. I've got two commissioners who may have questions or comments, starting with Commissioner Klucik. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Yeah. I would just suggest that, from what I can see, D.R. Horton created Mockingbird Crossing, and D.R. Horton is proposing this project, and maybe, you know, you could direct your frustration at not being notified of whatever -- you know, the details at them. But certainly, you know, you're -- from what I can gather, some of -- some of the people in Mockingbird Crossing would have been within the 500-foot radius, but clearly not most of them. And as to the traffic issue, I think it's -- you know, we have a traffic analysis from -- in the packet, and I don't think we -- it's fine from an objective measure, you know, that that's done when these petitions come before us. And, yes, there will be an increase in traffic, you know, obviously. I just started using that road recently, kind of like when we did that one road that happened to be on our agenda, I had just used it a month before. For the first time I used Massey road about a month ago to get to St. Agnes from Ave Maria, and, you know, I understand it seems like that's a really small road. But I think our planning staff, you know, and even the petitioner has probably, you know, 5.A.a Packet Pg. 46 Attachment: 08-19-21CCPC Meeting Minutes - Formatted pdf (19978 : August 19, 2021 CCPC Meeting Minutes) August 19, 2021 Page 42 of 72 made sure that what they were proposing was not going to violate the traffic requirements -- the traffic study analysis, and so I don't think there's really much we can do about that. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you. Commissioner Schmitt. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Yes. Rich, do you have your traffic guy here? MR. YOVANOVICH: Ted's on the phone. Oh, you're here. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: And I would ask Mr. Sawyer as well. Mike, if you're back there. I see you back there. Just for the record, from your traffic study -- MR. BYKAU: Yes, good morning. For the record -- COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: -- could you give us a highlight of what you found, and I'd like to have staff discuss what their -- defend their recommendation for approval based on what we're hearing about traffic. I know the area because I cut down that area when I go to Isam- -- what is it, Is -- what's the one at the corner? Isa -- on Immokalee Road, I have a relative that lives up the street, so I know that area. I always come off Collier and go down Tree Farm and go up Massey. I know the area. But go ahead. MR. BYKAU: For the record, Yury Bykau with TR Transportation Consultants. We did conduct a traffic study, as for every rezoning application, and our analysis -- one of our analyses we do is link-level service analysis, is to look at capacity on the surrounding roadway network. And I know there was a concern coming about, do we take into consideration other future project traffic into our trips? And I believe maybe Michael Sawyer can come and speak to that. But I believe the trip bank volumes that we used from the AUIR report represent approved future projects in the area -- COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Right. MR. BYKAU: -- and we include that in our traffic analysis. And then, on top of that, we add our project traffic. And the results for analysis indicated that there is sufficient capacity on the surrounding roadway network to support this rezoning request. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: I'm not saying people are not going to be inconvenienced. MR. BYKAU: Correct. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: They may, certainly during rush hour, but the studies all validate that the capacity is there. MR. BYKAU: Correct. And staff reviewed our traffic study, and I believe they are -- approved it, and it's been consistent. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Mike, if you would. THE COURT REPORTER: Can you spell your name. MR. BYKAU: First name, Y-u-r-y. Last name B-y-k-a-u. CHAIRMAN FRYER: I'd like to jump in on this witness, if I may, Commissioner. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Yeah, go ahead. Yeah, before. Yeah, thanks. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Mr. Expert Witness, I'm sorry. MR. BYKAU: Yury. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Yury. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Yes. Are you familiar with Road Segment 44 on the AUIR? MR. BYKAU: Yes. CHAIRMAN FRYER: What road is that? MR. BYKAU: That's Immokalee Road east of Woodcrest Drive. CHAIRMAN FRYER: And so how proximate is it to the site of this project? MR. BYKAU: How approximate? CHAIRMAN FRYER: How proximate? How close? MR. BYKAU: I don't know the exact distance. Maybe two miles. That's my guess. CHAIRMAN FRYER: But it would -- it would absorb at least some of the traffic, the new traffic -- MR. BYKAU: Yeah. 5.A.a Packet Pg. 47 Attachment: 08-19-21CCPC Meeting Minutes - Formatted pdf (19978 : August 19, 2021 CCPC Meeting Minutes) August 19, 2021 Page 43 of 72 CHAIRMAN FRYER: -- wouldn't it? Yeah. All right. Do you know what the status of the road is with respect to remaining capacity, level of service, and -- MR. BYKAU: Yes. It is getting pretty close to capacity. It has 95 trips remaining. And with our project, there will be 90 trips remaining. So we're only adding a few trips to that segment. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Yeah. But I just want to establish for the record that that particular segment goes deficient this year, correct? MR. BYKAU: No. It's -- in our analysis it's shown not to go deficient -- even when analysis was done 2025, there's still sufficient capacity, even with those -- including those trip bank volumes, which are very significant. CHAIRMAN FRYER: The 2020 AUIR, if I'm not mistaken -- and I can scroll to it here -- says that that segment goes deficient in 2021. Do you disagree with the AUIR, or is my recollection faulty? MR. BYKAU: Which AUIR did you mention; which year? CHAIRMAN FRYER: 2020, the one that's current. MR. BYKAU: Okay. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Mr. Chairman, where is the segment? CHAIRMAN FRYER: Forty-four is Collier and Immokalee, yeah. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: The intersection? CHAIRMAN FRYER: I think it includes the intersection. MR. BYKAU: There is a column in the AUIR report that does mention that it's projected in 2021 to fail. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Right. So this year, which is 2021 -- MR. BYKAU: Right. CHAIRMAN FRYER: -- it's projected to fail? MR. BYKAU: This is a column that you might need to ask Michael Sawyer about what this column represents. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Well, I could and would, but I know full well what it represents. MR. BYKAU: Right. I don't know how -- CHAIRMAN FRYER: I'm wondering if you do, sir. MR. BYKAU: I do. I just don't know how it's calculated directly. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Okay. Well, we can find out. That's all I have for this witness. Commissioner Schmitt, were you finished? COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Yes, I'm done. I just wanted to have Mike come up and preside -- provide his overview of his review of the project. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Mr. Sawyer. MR. SAWYER: Good morning, again. Mike Sawyer, Transportation Planning. As far as explaining the situation that we've got on Immokalee, that particular section is projected, with background traffic, to be deficient in -- in 2021. According to state statutes, we need to also look at parallel road segments that are within the five-year projection for improvements -- that would be Vanderbilt -- as well as we're not able to deter a development if the background traffic projected due to growth is what's -- what is projecting that failure. In other words, if -- if we've got a road segment that is nearing capacity and our growth projections for that road is showing that over the next five years there's a projected deficiency, that deficiency is the responsibility of us. Collier County's responsible to take care of that, not the individual developers. CHAIRMAN FRYER: I understand and certainly concur with your analysis of the law. My question, though -- you mentioned Vanderbilt. I would put forth this idea that each and every time or damn near each and every time that we have a development that involves Immokalee Road or other roads parallel to it, we hear about how the Vanderbilt Beach extension is 5.A.a Packet Pg. 48 Attachment: 08-19-21CCPC Meeting Minutes - Formatted pdf (19978 : August 19, 2021 CCPC Meeting Minutes) August 19, 2021 Page 44 of 72 going to be a panacea for it, and in each individual case that might be true. But is anyone looking at how in the aggregate the completion of Vanderbilt Beach Road will suffice to alleviate deficiencies such as on Segment 44? MR. SAWYER: Yes. And the way that that's done is anytime that the developer -- once they achieve zoning, when they start coming in for their individual plats and their SDPs, we get another slice of the -- another bite at the apple, if you will. They come in with a new TIS with the current standards, with the current AUIR, as well as what they're actually projecting to build. And that's important, I mean, because when a developer puts together a PUD, it's got a listing of possible uses that they might have. It has projected -- in this case a projected number of units. They may or may not reach that maximum unit count. They may or may not. They probably will, but -- on a smaller development like this, but they may not. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Let me try to ask it a little differently. I'm sorry I wasn't clear. This developer has -- his study concludes that there will be a few additional trips, peak p.m. trips on Segment 44, and we've got 95 left. So it's not, in and of itself, going to be material to -- in the near term, to Immokalee Road. My question for you, sir, is that let's say a year from now, by then all of the 95 trips have been used up and the road became deficient in 2021 and we're now in 2022 and a developer comes in and wants to add more trips to that road, what is going to be the position of your department? MR. SAWYER: At that point we would still be required, under 169 state statute, to also allow the project to go through because we still have Vanderbilt sitting there. CHAIRMAN FRYER: All right. I won't beat the dead horse. Thank you very much. Anything else for this witness? MR. YOVANOVICH: May I ask one question? CHAIRMAN FRYER: Yes, of course. MR. YOVANOVICH: I guess, Mr. Fry, I think you were going to ask a question, right? COMMISSIONER FRY: I was just going to ask Mike, there was mention of improvements to Massey as part of the Vanderbilt Beach project. Does that mean four-laning it? MR. SAWYER: No, just two lanes, but it would be a full two-lane. Currently that is an unusually narrow roadway, currently. It's going to be brought up to current standards for the county. It will be very similar to Woodcrest. COMMISSIONER FRY: Thank you. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Go ahead, Counselor. MR. YOVANOVICH: Thank you. Mr. Sawyer, you would agree that Collier County's professional transportation staff and its consultants have determined that this project meets all of the Collier County Growth Management Plan and LDC requirements for transportation, correct? MR. SAWYER: Correct. MR. YOVANOVICH: And you and your transportation staff have determined that the future construction of Vanderbilt Beach extension will address deficiencies related to Immokalee Road, was it Segment 44, correct? MR. SAWYER: Correct. MR. YOVANOVICH: That's all I have. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Okay. Thank you. Mr. Ceresa, are you still on the phone, sir? MR. CERESA: Yes, I am. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Do you have anything further, something new for us to think about? MR. CERESA: No, I think my main issue, and the issue with the people in this area, is that the county is not really looking at the future, and we here are going to end up suffering because of it with the amount of traffic that's going to come down here. Not just by this development, but all of the developments that are being built further out Immokalee. They all come in there in the 5.A.a Packet Pg. 49 Attachment: 08-19-21CCPC Meeting Minutes - Formatted pdf (19978 : August 19, 2021 CCPC Meeting Minutes) August 19, 2021 Page 45 of 72 morning, and they leave here in the afternoon, and a lot of them are coming down Massey Street, right past our houses. And I know you-all probably don't live in the area, so it doesn't bother you, but if you did, it would bother you, and you would look at some alternatives. MR. KLATZKOW: That was the whole point of Massey Street. The whole point -- Nick Casalanguida and I worked on this, like, a lifetime ago. The whole point of this was to divert traffic off of Immokalee Road so that it could save the intersection of Immokalee Road and Collier. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Correct. MR. KLATZKOW: And the point was to give people a bypass going down Immokalee. They would take Woodcrest/Massey to VBR and then head down on Collier -- COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Correct. MR. KLATZKOW: -- or they go ahead go down to Tree Farm and hit Collier that way. That was the entire point of this. So if the argument is that we're getting more traffic, yes, you are. That's what it was designed to do. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: That was the intent. MR. KLATZKOW: That was the intent. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: That was my point with Mr. -- with staff as well. That was the intent. That's why they built the traffic circle. That's why -- MR. KLATZKOW: That's why we did this. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Yes. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you. Anything else, Mr. Ceresa, that hasn't already been covered? MR. CERESA: No, that's it. Thank you. CHAIRMAN FRYER: All right, sir. Thank you very much. Oh, Commissioner Klucik has a question. Sorry, Commissioner. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Well, no. Mr. Chairman, I was just going to ask you -- I'm hoping we could plow through this before we break for lunch. Do you think -- I know maybe I'm being premature, but it seems like we're at that point now where we're -- CHAIRMAN FRYER: Well, I can tell you -- first of all, I think Mr. Yovanovich has accomplished at least some of his rebuttal, I hope, and -- so I don't anticipate that this is going to go too much longer. My hope has been that we could work until 1:00 p.m. and try to -- we've got three other matters, but they're not -- I don't think they're lengthy or detailed. And so my hope is is that we could finish up by 1:00 and then have our lunch on our own -- COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: I'm here, Mr. Chairman. What do you mean it's going to be easy to get through those items? CHAIRMAN FRYER: I stand corrected. I stand corrected. Sir, I'm sorry. I can't call on you. Actually, I can call on you. If there's any unregistered speaker who wishes to be heard on this matter, now is the time. So, sir, you need to be sworn in, and then we'll hear you. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: They both stood up, didn't they, for -- sworn in? CHAIRMAN FRYER: Oh, you're sworn in. MR. CURRAN: May I? CHAIRMAN FRYER: Please approach. MR. CURRAN: My name is Tim Curran. I'm the -- and, actually, I did call Mr. Finn a couple weeks ago and told him I wanted to speak, so I'm not sure how I didn't get on the list. But, anyway, here I am. My name is Timothy Curran. I am the vice president of the Canopy Neighborhood Association Board of Directors as well as one of the affected homeowners along the Canopy/Soluna border. Our association attorney did send in a letter from our board detailing our concerns with this project. We are concerned about the buffer width between the properties and both the size and amount of landscaping screening used in that buffer. I did appreciate hearing how they're going to 5.A.a Packet Pg. 50 Attachment: 08-19-21CCPC Meeting Minutes - Formatted pdf (19978 : August 19, 2021 CCPC Meeting Minutes) August 19, 2021 Page 46 of 72 be talking about maybe using larger landscaping so that -- we appreciate that. We are concerned about security and noise. We don't want to see all of the beautiful, mature pine trees along our shared border cut down and replaced with basically 10-foot trees in pots, okay. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Did you say pine or palm? MR. CURRAN: Pine. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Pine. MR. CURRAN: I'm sorry, pine trees. Most importantly, Canopy residents feel that the proposed density of seven dwelling units per acre, which is the absolute maximum allowed, versus basically the current zoning on the parcel of four dwelling units per acre, is way too much for this relatively small parcel of 18-and-a-half acres. In real numbers, that is 130 units versus only 74. All of the surrounding communities are single-family homes. Allowing a project with 130 total units, which is seven dwelling units per acre, is simply not compatible with the surrounding communities. You've got Vanderbilt, you've got Canopy, you've got Mockingbird. I mean, those are single-family homes with yards around them. I think they're half a million dollars apiece or more. You know, it's -- putting 130 units in a small area just is -- you know, it doesn't fit. Canopy proposes reducing the density from the requested seven dwelling units per acre to down just over six, specifically eliminating Buildings 4, 5 and 6, a reduction of only 18 units. This would yield 112 units instead of the proposed 130. On the Collier County view, there's actually -- instead of having just a real general, like, rectangular box representing units. I mean, there's actually a map on here that shows a total of 19 buildings and, you know, having -- and the part bordering Canopy, it shows three buildings, Building 4, Building 5, Building 6, having six units apiece. So I think showing that particular map will give a much better view of what they're proposing instead of just having that one with the -- a few rectangles on it. You know, having this amount of reducing these units here would give more green space inside the development along with more pervious land to help with surface water management and reduce flooding. It would allow most of the existing mature pine trees along the western border to remain, possibly yielding more conservation area. The buffer between the two developments would be widened, allowing for increased landscaping screening. There would be less noise from air conditioners and less visual impact for all homeowners along our shared border. Canopy residents feel very strongly about this. Reducing the property size by taking out those three buildings would reduce only by 18 units, will fix almost all of the issue we are concerned about. Canopy wants to make sure our communities are safe and secure, so I'm happy to hear about putting up a fence. That's something that was not talked about before, and we're glad to hear that. We would also -- Canopy would also ask the county to require a screening wall be built around the air conditioning units outside the homes because, you know, if you can imagine 18 A/C units going all at the same time, it would be quite noisy. Not only will this reduce visual impact for future Soluna homeowners, it will help reduce noise for Soluna and all surrounding properties. Collier County loves its trees and requires them on all new PUDs. Why, then, should we allow existing native mature trees to be cut down? You know, remove the exotic trees, but keep as many of the mature trees as possible. It would look nicer for all surrounding neighborhoods, as the tall pines can be seen for quite some distance. Those trees will also block sightlines so homeowners on each side will see more tree and less concrete thereby retaining some semblance of privacy. Residents of Canopy are not opposed to development as long as it is done responsibly. We want nearby development to have a positive impact on our surroundings, not take away from it. We feel zoning the parcel for a density of six dwelling units per acre is a much more reasonable 5.A.a Packet Pg. 51 Attachment: 08-19-21CCPC Meeting Minutes - Formatted pdf (19978 : August 19, 2021 CCPC Meeting Minutes) August 19, 2021 Page 47 of 72 amount than seven. That is a 50 percent increase over the existing zoning of four. Please do not allow a density of seven dwelling units per acre. Zone it for six and eliminate Buildings 4, 5 and 6, keeping that space mostly open and green. As I mentioned earlier, this will solve almost all of our concerns. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you. Commissioner Klucik. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: I guess the point of my -- I brought it up, and I kind of didn't press it when I -- I think maybe when I was talking with you guys privately. But if you look at that, you know, affordable housing to the west of Canopy, that looks like it's pretty dense. And I'm thinking it's -- you know, it's a very similar density. I would -- you know, just based on looking at it. And it's -- you know, it becomes difficult, then, to say it's not compatible, you know, with the community or that the concerns you raise are things, you know, when you bought. I don't know if Canopy was first and then affordable housing came in or what. But, you know, because you have beautiful, you know, property with -- you know, with nice vegetation on it, that's -- you know, that's kind of what everybody -- when you're kind of in earlier, you're always going to end up, you know, with that and -- you know, and you have to expect that the neighbors get to use their land according to -- you know, to how -- you know, the development code. And in this case, I just think that your -- your concern about density is certainly a concern that everybody would have in your situation, but you have to look at what's, you know, on your immediate western boundary. It looks like the same density or similar density, and I don't know what the density is, but that seems like it's an awfully dense project. MR. CURRAN: I would agree with that. You also, if you were to look at our map, we don't have homes, for the most part, abutting that border. There's a wall there, then we have our mailboxes, then we have Canopy Circle, and then we have the front of the homes with the front yard and then the actual house is there. So we don't actually have backs of homes butting up against Bristol Pines. The only area -- you'll see a lake there. We have some homes around the lake but, you know, all that -- all that section where you see the two properties coming together, that's where our street is, and we have a wall there, and actually, there's, you know, a little bit of landscaping in there as well. So there's not actually a house butting to that. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: I guess my point is that it's hard for me to come up with a basis to deny, you know, based on -- your objections are all reasonable as far as concerns that any neighbor would have, but I just look at the -- you know, even saying that, you know, oh, well, could we force a wall there because of -- you know, it's not considered compatible, like Mr. Klatzkow suggested, I just -- you know, I look at the area around it, and I just see that that's -- you know, it seems compatible to me. MR. CURRAN: I would just have to comment on that. I mean, you look at the list of deviations that they're requesting. You know, in order to fit -- in order to maximum seven dwelling units per acre, 130 units, they're asking for a number of deviations to allow them to cram as much in as possible. So you look at Deviation No. 1, to allow a local street right-of-way width of 60 feet down to 50 feet; you have Deviation No. 2 which prohibits dead-end streets except when designated as a cul-de-sac; then you have No. 3, which requires 5-foot sidewalks within public and private rights-of-way or easements which are internal to the site on both sides of local internal access way streets to allow sidewalks to be constructed only on the side of the street that are directly adjacent to residential units. I mean, there's -- if we're having to change the rules to allow this to happen, I think it's too much. So if having to make all these changes rules -- rule changes to get this to fit, then it's clearly too much. So I think, you know, reducing that density is important. I think seven is way too much for the size -- for an 18-and-a-half-acre parcel. It was brought up earlier that if you had a 20 -- like, 21-acre parcel, you would not -- they 5.A.a Packet Pg. 52 Attachment: 08-19-21CCPC Meeting Minutes - Formatted pdf (19978 : August 19, 2021 CCPC Meeting Minutes) August 19, 2021 Page 48 of 72 would not be able to do this. So why -- it's hard for me to comprehend why they could get away with it with only 18 and a half. It's -- you know, to me, that doesn't make sense. I understand what they're trying to do in terms of a private property situation but, I mean, this property was already being used. This isn't some vacant land that was just kind of sitting or forgotten about or -- you know, this was an antenna farm. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you. Commissioner Schmitt. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Yes. You mentioned Buildings 4, 5 and 6. MR. CURRAN: Uh-huh. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Do you have any kind of reference? I have no idea what you're talking about. I don't have the -- any type of drawing that show 4, 5 and 6. Could you put it on the visualizer, please? MR. CURRAN: I've got -- I took that off of CityView. So that has -- if you were able to see that -- a total of 19 buildings and 130 units in there, and Canopy would be on the left-hand side of your screen. Buildings 4, 5 and 6 would be, you know, those three along the left. There's a top part there, which we can't see. I can't fit the whole thing in. But, you know, taking out -- that's 18 units right there. That's, from what I'm understanding, is what they're proposing. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Can I ask the applicant, is this the current submittal, or is this a concept plan? MR. YOVANOVICH: We're in for our plat. And just -- the number we're in for is 108 units. So this is the 108 units. What he's not -- he's not asking us to go to 112. He's asking us to go to 90. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Yes, I understand. MR. YOVANOVICH: He wants us to eliminate Buildings 4, 5, and 6, which is 18 units. So he wants us to go to 90 units, not 112, because he's asking us to eliminate 18 units from a plan that only shows 108. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Anything else, Commissioner? COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: And you're -- you're at how many now? MR. YOVANOVICH: Hundred and eight. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Hundred and eight. MR. YOVANOVICH: Which is six units an acre. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Which is? MR. YOVANOVICH: Six units an acre. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Six units an acre. MR. YOVANOVICH: 5.8. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: That is six units an acre. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Isn't that what you asked for? MR. KLATZKOW: So why are we zoning at seven? MR. YOVANOVICH: Because at -- when we started the process, we had did not have the plat in. MR. KLATZKOW: No, I understand that, but now that you know what you're developing, why don't we just do six -- why don't we just do six and be done with this? COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Yeah. That's my next question. It's six units an acre. MR. YOVANOVICH: And if you recall, when I began, I told you it was 108 under the current configuration. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Yes. MR. YOVANOVICH: With townhomes. And I had said we wanted to keep the flexibility. In the event that townhome product was not well received by the market, we wanted to have the ability to do the traditional multifamily homes within the project. That's what I said, and that's the flexibility we're looking to keep but, obviously, we'd be all in the same development standards of two stories, et cetera. 5.A.a Packet Pg. 53 Attachment: 08-19-21CCPC Meeting Minutes - Formatted pdf (19978 : August 19, 2021 CCPC Meeting Minutes) August 19, 2021 Page 49 of 72 COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Okay. MR. YOVANOVICH: That's what we were -- that's what we were proposing, and we're -- we've committed -- if I -- I'll save for rebuttal. I don't know what I'm supposed to do now, because you have a witness up here, so I didn't know what's the proper -- CHAIRMAN FRYER: Why don't you save it for rebuttal, if you can, just so we can -- COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Is that all you have, sir? MR. YOVANOVICH: I have one question for him. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Go ahead. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Go ahead. MR. YOVANOVICH: Did you review the -- you live in Buttonwood Preserve, correct? That's the PUD. MR. CURRAN: Well, it's Canopy PUD. MR. YOVANOVICH: But it's the Buttonwood Preserve PUD? MR. CURRAN: I think the prior name for it, yes. MR. YOVANOVICH: Okay. Do you have any idea what the street widths are in Buttonwood Preserve? MR. CURRAN: I want to say -- I want to say 50, correct. MR. YOVANOVICH: So Buttonwood Preserve asked for the same deviation that we're asking for, correct? MR. CURRAN: We have 52-and-a-half acres with 108 houses. MR. YOVANOVICH: Do you know what you were originally approved for? MR. CURRAN: I do not. MR. YOVANOVICH: It was 220. Would you trust me that it was 220? MR. CURRAN: I wasn't here when it -- I didn't move here when it was being planned, so I just know what we have now. MR. YOVANOVICH: Well, I will state: It was approved twice, once by me at 220 and then subsequently amended by Mr. Anderson for Neal Communities for 220. So that was the originally approved density on that project. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Anything further from this, counselor? MR. YOVANOVICH: That's all I have. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Okay. Commissioner Fry. COMMISSIONER FRY: So I'm looking at a rendering of the townhomes. I believe it's a rendering. It's on Page 217 of our packet, Ray. Wondering if you could put that up. I was going down the thread with you, Mr. Curran, of -- you know, Mr. Klucik expressed his opinion in terms of as one planning commissioner and, you know, there's seven of us up here to vote. MR. CURRAN: Sure. COMMISSIONER FRY: So there are -- I think we have a lot of options. As our attorney has said, we have the purview to reduce it to six or five or four. You know, those are discretionary, those three bonus units. So I'm trying to think of what are the various options that we do have and one -- one is, of course, beefing up the buffer. They've offered more mature trees, higher, more opacity, I think, sooner. I'm looking at the rendering of the townhome. It looks to me like the garages are down below and most of the living spaces up above. So I thought, well, what about one-story units along your neighborhood so -- to eliminate that visibility and the sightlines of seeing that even through the landscaping, but that doesn't look feasible based on the architecture of the units. He's proposing 108 units here but, of course, there are 18 two-story townhomes that abut your community. About -- I think about 12 of those actually line up with your -- with your community. MR. CURRAN: Well, the entire -- as far as where the houses are, yes, because we have a preserve up by Tree Farm Road that comes down a little bit, so. 5.A.a Packet Pg. 54 Attachment: 08-19-21CCPC Meeting Minutes - Formatted pdf (19978 : August 19, 2021 CCPC Meeting Minutes) August 19, 2021 Page 50 of 72 COMMISSIONER FRY: Right. But you're -- you know, they've -- you asked -- you're suggesting six units per acre. They have a plan that is about six. They have a plan they're showing that is six, but you still have the same issues of proximity. MR. CURRAN: Correct. COMMISSIONER FRY: The units that are along your border. So then if they are honoring your request of six here, then you're really left with a -- either eliminating all those and going down to 90, like Mr. Yovanovich says, or beefing up the buffering wall, something like that. So just give me your thoughts, because that is -- that is based on your recommendation of six right there, or at least it counts out to six dwelling units per acre. MR. CURRAN: I thought -- I was thinking that that was 130 from that look right there. I think that's still extremely dense for what that property size is. I mean, if you were to do the math for four per acre, you would be at 74, I believe. So even -- you know, even at -- if he's saying 110, that's still significantly over where it would at -- where it normally would be at. Because if that was a 22-acre parcel, it would be at four acre -- four dwelling units per acre. I mean, am I not correct in saying that? COMMISSIONER FRY: I think so. The 20 acres is, you know, a line they drew in the sand. It's somewhat arbitrary, I guess. But it is part of the policy and part of the GMP, so it is something we have to consider is they do qualify for up to three bonus units. So I'm just looking for ways to resolve this to your relative satisfaction and to their relative satisfaction. MR. CURRAN: If they could take the whole thing and shift it over some more to the right, utilize some of the area between our border as -- count that as some conservation area. Keep those -- the tall trees that are there, maybe plant some additional stuff, use -- take some of the conservation area on the other side where there is a big buffer between that and Massey, I think it would possibly be good. It would probably alleviate a lot of the concerns. The biggest concern is having basically a backyard, you know, those people looking in our house and us looking into them having basically a 30-foot backyard in between us with a couple hedge rows, you know. And if you're in the second floor looking out, you'll clearly be able to see over most of those hedges and the palm trees that are there. You know, cutting down all those trees will just -- it will open it all up, I think. And that's what most of my neighbors are concerned about who live along that corridor. They'd like to see -- CHAIRMAN FRYER: Pardon me for interrupting, but we're now covering ground that's already been covered, and I want to be -- MR. CURRAN: Correct. CHAIRMAN FRYER: -- sure that anything new that needs to be said, that you have the opportunity to say it. Have you covered all your points? MR. CURRAN: Yes, I have. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Okay. Thank you very much. No one is signaling at this point, so I take it no one has questions or comments. And that -- do we have any other public speakers? We do not. Now, that would take us to rebuttal. It's my assessment that Mr. Yovanovich has been able to accomplish some, perhaps most of his rebuttal, but he has an opportunity to do more. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Do we need to offer her a break? CHAIRMAN FRYER: I'm going to do that. Well, I'll do it right now. It's six minutes after 12. We need to decide how long we're going to be here today. We can ask Mr. Yovanovich how much rebuttal he has. We still have three more items. I think they're relatively short. Are we going to try to take a lunch and come back, or are we going to try to postpone our lunch and complete our business before we go our separate ways? COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Postpone. COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: Postpone. Finish by 1:00. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Are we taking a break now, though? COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: No. 5.A.a Packet Pg. 55 Attachment: 08-19-21CCPC Meeting Minutes - Formatted pdf (19978 : August 19, 2021 CCPC Meeting Minutes) August 19, 2021 Page 51 of 72 COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Plow through. Okay. I'm hearing differences of opinion. COMMISSIONER VERNON: I'm willing to keep going until we're done. CHAIRMAN FRYER: All right. All those in favor of keeping going, well, until 1:00. We've got to be taking a break if we go beyond 1:00, I mean, for the court reporter and for everyone else. So all those in favor -- is the court reporter -- would that be satisfactory, or do we need to take a break sooner? THE COURT REPORTER: I could use, like, five minutes. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Okay. Let's take a five-minute break right now. Five-minute break right now. We're in recess until 12:12. (A brief recess was had from 12:07 p.m. to 12:12 p.m.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: Ladies and gentlemen, let's return. And we on the dais are going to try to make a decision as to whether we are going to try to plow through before lunch or to take a lunch and come back and finish. First question, Mr. Yovanovich, how much rebuttal will you have? MR. YOVANOVICH: Less than five minutes. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Okay. And, undoubtedly, there will be some questions, though, or comments that will come out of that, so it's going to be a little longer than that. So I think at least one commissioner mentioned that he has some significant questions on one of our remaining three items, and there may be other questions coming up on them. So I think -- it's doubtful, in my judgment, that we could finish by 1:00, but we might be able to finish by 1:30. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Yeah. CHAIRMAN FRYER: So should we try to go to 1:30? COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Yes. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Anybody object -- COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: Let's let Joe ask his questions first. CHAIRMAN FRYER: We'll do that. We'll do that. Does anybody object to us going to 1:30? COMMISSIONER FRY: No, sir. COMMISSIONER VERNON: No. CHAIRMAN FRYER: All right. That's what we'll do, then. Mr. Yovanovich, you have the floor. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Before he does that, what about the other item we were going to talk about, the continuation thing? CHAIRMAN FRYER: Well, that's on at Item 11. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Okay. CHAIRMAN FRYER: That's one of the three. Go ahead, sir. MR. YOVANOVICH: I wanted to -- I just want to focus on the adjacency issue with Canopy. We're -- I've got up on the screen -- Troy told me to use this -- we're talking about five homes within the Canopy project that are adjacent/abutting the proposed project. And their concern -- and I understand their concern about -- is how close are the buildings going to be? What are they going to see? What are they going to hear? The reality is, they have this buffer on their side, and we are proposing a similar Type B buffer which is a row of hedges that is opaque, I believe at six feet in height within a year, and then we have our trees. And we've already committed to planting trees that will be at the height where you see that dotted dash line. So it will -- they will be planted at the sightline level as we're building those buildings along the western boundary. So I think what we've done is we've addressed their concerns about 5.A.a Packet Pg. 56 Attachment: 08-19-21CCPC Meeting Minutes - Formatted pdf (19978 : August 19, 2021 CCPC Meeting Minutes) August 19, 2021 Page 52 of 72 will people be able to see through their hedge? We're not going to be able to see through their hedge because we'll have our hedge, and we'll have their hedge. We've already done the exercise of can we actually move the preserve over to the western boundary, and the answer is no. It does not meet your Comprehensive Planning, so between the preserve requirements and having to provide for compensating water management, floodplain management, the preserve is set where the preserve needs to be consistent with your code. So we are willing to address it through taller plantings at the initial planting to address concerns about compatibility. We've agreed to do a fence to address safety concerns about people leaving our property going to their property and maybe, I guess, vice versa, coming from their property to our property. So I think we've addressed those concerns. If it makes everybody comfortable for us to reduce the density to 108 units, because that's really what's going through the process right now, we'll reduce it from 130 to 108, which is slightly less than six units per acre. I did the math based upon 18 acres. I think we're 18-and-a-half, but the number would be 108. The irony of their concern about the air conditioning units is their neighbors' air conditioning units are actually closer to their houses than what we're proposing because, remember, we're 30 feet away from property line, so our A/C unit are going to be even further away than their current A/C units, and we're going to have our hedge and buffer. So putting additional sound attenuation around those A/C units is not necessary for compatibility. You've received professional compatibility testimony from Ken and from Ray and your staff. The competent substantial evidence regarding compatibility is what we're proposing is compatible with the neighbors. We have residential next to residential. We have two-story. They have two-story. We're actually a little lower in height than they are in height. We're talking about two-story townhomes on this piece of property, and we're consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The 20 acres has been in the code for as long as I can remember, and it used to be three free units that you can come in and ask for, but it was modified when the Rural Fringe Mixed-Use District provisions came into place, because you wanted to provide an incentive for people to purchase TDRs. And the reason you do infill is you have these 20-acre parcels, and they already have infrastructure to them. You didn't want to encourage people to continue to go further east. You wanted to fill in the urban area, thus urban -- residential -- urban residential infill is what has been encouraged by your Comprehensive Plan. You need the economies of scales for these smaller parcels to make economic sense. They still have to be compatible, and I believe residential next to residential is clearly comparable. But you don't have to believe me. You can believe Ray. You can believe Tim. You can believe Ken. They've all given you the professional testimony that we've met the compatibility criteria. Transportation-wise, we've met those criteria as well. I won't belabor the whole transportation system, but if you look, most of the PUDs along Tree Farm Road came in around 2004'ish with this concept of Woodcrest/Massey going all the way down to Vanderbilt Beach Road as well as Tree Farm Road. So the system is being built to accommodate everybody along the way, and it was always designed to do that. The reality is, there have been some units that have not been -- they were zoned but haven't been built, so you -- it turns out that I'm sure the -- less units than were contemplated will be using those roads than were going to be officially zoned to use those roads. We believe we've met the criteria. Your staff's recommending approval, and we're asking that you recommend approval to the Board of County Commissioners of this project with the modifications that we've offered up regarding the fence, the additional plantings. And if you want to reduce this to 108 units, reduce us to 108 units, because that's the plan that's going through the process right now. With that, we'll answer any other questions you may have. 5.A.a Packet Pg. 57 Attachment: 08-19-21CCPC Meeting Minutes - Formatted pdf (19978 : August 19, 2021 CCPC Meeting Minutes) August 19, 2021 Page 53 of 72 CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you. Commissioner Fry. COMMISSIONER FRY: Rich, the Type B buffer, what is the separation between the taller trees? Is it 25 feet on center? MR. YOVANOVICH: On center, yeah. COMMISSIONER FRY: So that's about from me to you? MR. YOVANOVICH: I think we're a little further apart than 25 feet. COMMISSIONER FRY: It may be 30. But perhaps myself to the podium that you're standing at. I guess the only -- the one concern I think that is viable still is the sightline's nice laterally. Obviously, you see that the trees are tall enough, but it looks to me as if initially -- and they would -- it would be pretty easy visibility between those trees because of that spacing for the second-story units to see in and vice versa across that buffer. What is the next step up in terms of buffering in terms of maybe a little less spacing between the trees? Or just what is the next step up for a Type C buffer? MR. KLATZKOW: Can staff answer that question? COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Here comes Jaime. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Ms. Cook. MS. COOK: Jaime Cook, your director of Development Review. A Type C buffer would actually have 30-foot on center trees and a double row hedge. The Type B buffer -- so you're going to have to those 25 foot spaced apart trees, but you're also going to have a five-foot hedge at planting. COMMISSIONER FRY: Okay. MR. YOVANOVICH: And I'll give you the layman's, but to be backed up by the professional, is the canopy of those trees, when they mature, get very wide. So they do, in fact, form the wall of trees, if you will. They have to have room to grow and spread the canopy of the tree, and -- COMMISSIONER FRY: Do they meet, and would they -- would they obscure the sightline from that second-story unit looking across the buffer at the properties in Canopy? MS. PETRY: Yeah. The simple -- CHAIRMAN FRYER: Your name, please, ma'am. MS. PETRY: I'm Kristen Petry. My company is Pergola, and I'm here helping D.R. Horton today. The general idea for a landscape buffer is, as it's governed by code, is that there's a tiered system in place. So, essentially, the hedge governs and blocks out the area that's from the ground to whatever code says the top of the hedge should be. So, for example, a less involved hedge or a less opaque hedge would be the D buffer that goes adjacent to a road, and you're only required to have a much shorter hedge. I think it's a 24-inch or 36-inch at height of planting. This is a beefier hedge from time to time that it goes in, because code requires that it be a five-foot-tall hedge when it grows in. So if I'm 5'5", it's only slightly shorter than me. That takes up the whole portion of the tree from where it comes out of the ground to where the first branching starts, and then the canopy rises to 10 to 12 feet, which is what code says it should be at the time that it goes in, and it will be roughly probably five foot apart, and code also governs that. And I think it's probably a 4- to 5-foot spread that it's required to be when it goes in. However, what code also says is that a tree like that should be a large-size canopy tree, and the county actually has a list of what species it considers to be a canopy tree. So we would be -- Soluna, as a project, would also be complying with that. And those trees are the things like live oak trees. You know, those are the easiest ones to point out. (Undiscernible) state tree. It's the one we all know. They get tall and wide and so, essentially, what you have is the tiered idea where you have the trees at the top, and then you have the mid layer and the bottom layer accomplished by a 5.A.a Packet Pg. 58 Attachment: 08-19-21CCPC Meeting Minutes - Formatted pdf (19978 : August 19, 2021 CCPC Meeting Minutes) August 19, 2021 Page 54 of 72 5-foot-tall shrub. By the time you buy a 5-foot-tall shrub, that's a significant increase from a thing that would be the three-gallon shrub for a D buffer, which is the less stringent buffer that we use along the road. So before -- like right out of the gate, this is a much better -- it's an upgraded buffer, essentially. And I think then, once you apply that and you take it into consideration with the fact that there's already a B buffer on the other side, you're -- you're creating a buffer pathway that's combined. So if you think about it, I think of the landscape as a story, right, and so we're linking this story all throughout the county. And when you're coming over and you're landing in the airplane and you look down and you see all these parcels of different colors of green with the strips in between, it's -- it just starts to make sense, and because it's a fairly wide combined buffer of 25 feet, that's a decent buffer, really. It's inconvenient to get through by the time it grows in. There's going to be less crossing back and forth. I think the views are handled in between, and it also does good things like makes a wildlife corridor. And because the county also ensures that we are using a majority of native species, you're also achieving that. So from my perspective, I think it meets intent of code, and I think it's doing a good thing. COMMISSIONER FRY: If you were trying to obscure the views both ways between two developments and you have an existing Type B buffer on one side, would you stagger the trees on your side to be in between the trunks of those trees so that they would stagger and pretty much of block the view? MS. PETRY: Yeah, absolutely, absolutely. And there are some things that can be done during the building process, too. There are always slight adjustments, and part of the thing that we're required to do that the county, in its wisdom, has foreseen would need to happen is the landscape architect needs to certify that, first of all, the -- what has arrived on site and what has been installed complies with the plan that was approved but also that we've made practical decisions along the way to help the site and its adjacent neighbors function well together. And so, yeah, that's just a thing that we would do as a matter of course. Look at where the windows are. Block the views as best we can. Stagger when we can do it, cluster when we can do it. Yeah, I hope that helps. COMMISSIONER FRY: In your professional opinion, with these two buffers combined with each other, to what percent would they obscure the view each way between these -- because these units are very close. I think we would all prefer buffer -- the preserve is on the other side closer to this neighborhood. But you have the units that are very, very close. So will these buffers obscure the view to what percentage? MS. PETRY: In five years' time, I would say 80 to 100 percent. I would refer to the little drawings that I did here. When you go in, stuff will be babies, and that's just the way that it is. And it would be onerous and beyond what code requires to ask the developer to put -- to start out with -- COMMISSIONER FRY: Five year -- are you -- MS. PETRY: To start out with a five-year condition, I guess. COMMISSIONER FRY: Is that what you're offering, to start out with a five-year condition, Rich? MS. PETRY: No, absolutely not. MR. YOVANOVICH: I would say we're probably starting out at the three-year condition gets you to the -- to this line right here. This one right here, okay. It's about three -- normally it would take, from when you plant it -- I'm sorry, up here. To fill that gap would take about three years. We're saying -- and the five-year is the one on the bottom. COMMISSIONER FRY: Gotcha. MR. YOVANOVICH: So what we're saying is we'll get to the three-year -- we're going to plant at the three-year, and it gets to the gap, and then when the whole thing is totally mature, you're going to have the one on the bottom. COMMISSIONER FRY: Thank you. 5.A.a Packet Pg. 59 Attachment: 08-19-21CCPC Meeting Minutes - Formatted pdf (19978 : August 19, 2021 CCPC Meeting Minutes) August 19, 2021 Page 55 of 72 MR. YOVANOVICH: Does that make sense? CHAIRMAN FRYER: Commissioner Vernon. COMMISSIONER VERNON: Yeah. On the fence, you're going to build a 6-foot chain-link fence vinyl? MR. YOVANOVICH: Yes. COMMISSIONER VERNON: And you said -- but we talked about the timing. When are you going to do that, and can you commit to that in terms of what we -- MR. YOVANOVICH: We would do that as part of the overall initial site work, correct, the fence? Now, the landscape will go in a little bit later when we get over to that area because of -- COMMISSIONER VERNON: I'm just thinking the issue of safety the mom raised. So that will go in and -- okay. So I think that's really my only question. So just in the interest of time, you know, I would request they do move down to the density of 108, that they plant the more mature trees that's been discussed, that they put the fence up immediately, and I would support the project based on that. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you. MR. YOVANOVICH: When you say "immediately," as we're doing the initial site work -- COMMISSIONER VERNON: Right, as soon as you can. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Is the fence going to be along the border? MR. YOVANOVICH: Yeah. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: In between the two buffers? MR. YOVANOVICH: We anticipate the fence will be right on the property line. So, yes, it would be between the two buffers, their buffer and our buffer. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Are we ready for a motion, Mr. Chairman? CHAIRMAN FRYER: We've still got other speakers from up here. Thank you. Commissioner Shea. COMMISSIONER SHEA: No. Actually, that was my question was, where is the fence? Where's the -- is it going to run just between where those six homes are, or is it going to engulf the property? MR. YOVANOVICH: Right now we would put it -- I'm sorry. I wasn't close to the mic. I'm sorry. We would do along the west boundary initially. We're not sure we're going to have a fence along the southern boundary and the -- do I have it right -- southern and eastern boundary. But we're definitely agreeing to have the fence along -- tie into their fence to keep Canopy secure. My understanding is is Vanderbilt Country Club has one already. So the only gap, Mr. Vernon, in fencing is along Canopy already. So we would fill that gap. And I think -- and don't -- I'm not -- I think their fence line ends approximately here, right? MR. GALLANDER: That's correct. MR. YOVANOVICH: That's where their fence ends, so we would take it the whole way up to here. CHAIRMAN FRYER: On which side? MR. YOVANOVICH: That's the west. That doesn't mean we may not do it along the other boundaries, but right now we're committing to the west. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Commissioner Schmitt. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Yes. I would also recommend that the units that are on the western property -- we heard the commissioner talk -- or the homeowners talk about the A/C units. I don't think it would be that onerous for you to put up some kind of a vinyl fence around the A/C units, especially these 6-unit units that are being -- six -- or 6-unit buildings that are being placed on the western side. I'm also thinking about the people that are living in those units. You 5.A.a Packet Pg. 60 Attachment: 08-19-21CCPC Meeting Minutes - Formatted pdf (19978 : August 19, 2021 CCPC Meeting Minutes) August 19, 2021 Page 56 of 72 can put up a fairly inexpensive vinyl decorative fence to buffer some of the noise around those A/C units. I don't think -- I'm not talking about a masonry wall, a concrete masonry unit type brick wall. It's just a decorative vinyl fence, fairly inexpensive, but you could surround -- certainly allow for sufficient space for air to circulate in those units not to be encumbered by the fence blocking air flow. But you could put up some kind of a decorative fence both for the homeowners that are moving in and the homeowners on the western property line. MR. YOVANOVICH: And just so we're talking language -- COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Yes. MR. YOVANOVICH: -- to the height of the A/C unit. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Yes, absolutely. MR. YOVANOVICH: That's approximately three feet. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Absolutely. And those are very inexpensive decorative fence. You know what I'm talking about. A vinyl -- MR. YOVANOVICH: We just want to make sure you weren't asking us to put a 6-foot hedge to block the window view. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: No, no. MR. YOVANOVICH: I just wanted to -- COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Just something to help muffle some of the sound. COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: They could use shrubs. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: They could use shrubs as well, but shrubs are not -- and a lot of the units -- a lot of those multifamily units already construct -- put in these -- this, you know, vinyl fencing. What is it, 2-and-a-half, 3-foot, 4-foot, whatever height it is. I don't think that would be onerous on the developer's part. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Is that just on those three buildings? COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: I would prefer it all the buildings, but that's me, because I live in a community that has to screen A/C units. Most of the -- most of the developers in my -- some do and some don't. But I'm just saying on the western property. That's all I'm talking about. Whatever you do for the rest of it for marketing or sales, you do it internally, but I would say those -- just those units facing to the west. MR. YOVANOVICH: Okay. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Okay. CHAIRMAN FRYER: All right. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: And I -- as to the other two items, we talked about the fence, and six dwelling units per acre I would support as well. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you. No one else is signaling. Any other questions or comments from the dais? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: If not, I think we're -- assuming you're finished, Mr. Yovanovich? MR. YOVANOVICH: I am finished unless somebody calls me up and asks me a question, or if the motion's not clear, I may ask you to clarify. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Okay. Well, I'm going to try to state the motion with the conditions that I've heard, and then I'll ask the Planning Commission if I omitted anything or added something that was not agreed to, and then that will set the stage, perhaps, for a motion and a second, if that works for everybody. So -- and these are in no particular order. But first of all, the developer will meet the five-year buffering commitment in three years as far as the buffering vegetation height is -- COMMISSIONER FRY: I believe that's two. CHAIRMAN FRYER: I heard three. COMMISSIONER FRY: They're planting -- they're planting trees that would be at the three-year level of maturity, meaning they would only take two years to reach the five-year, is what I heard. 5.A.a Packet Pg. 61 Attachment: 08-19-21CCPC Meeting Minutes - Formatted pdf (19978 : August 19, 2021 CCPC Meeting Minutes) August 19, 2021 Page 57 of 72 COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: I think you're making it confusing. Just put it up on the line of sight. MR. YOVANOVICH: How about I modify this exhibit to where the top exhibit shows the height of the trees at planting? Because that's what we committed to, this line right here. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Yes. MR. YOVANOVICH: We would modify that exhibit for the record so you all would know. COMMISSIONER FRY: Your applicant was signaling you. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Would you indicate the height on that exhibit? Because that is what the county will look at when they go out and do the final inspection. So they're -- MR. YOVANOVICH: I'm sorry, Joe. I mean, Mr. Schmitt. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Go ahead. I would say, if you'd put on there the height -- MR. YOVANOVICH: Let's do that. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: -- so that the county knows what to look for. MR. YOVANOVICH: My consultant says I would plant at 12 under the current code, but 16-foot trees is what I need to get to the line. So why don't we agree to plant 16-foot trees? COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Very good. CHAIRMAN FRYER: So then the first condition would be that at the startup, at get-go, they would plant 16-feet trees at the -- MR. YOVANOVICH: On the western boundary. CHAIRMAN FRYER: On the western boundary, okay. COMMISSIONER VERNON: Sorry to interrupt, but are they going to plant more mature shrubbery as well? Was that part of it? CHAIRMAN FRYER: Not according to my notes. COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: That's in the code already. They're at five feet. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Shrubbery grows fast. MR. YOVANOVICH: So not to put too fine a point on it, what we -- where we were talking about doing that was along those homes, because they have their preserve north of that area, so it was for the -- COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Southern boundary. MR. YOVANOVICH: So from basically here up to here. COMMISSIONER VERNON: Right. MR. YOVANOVICH: I just want to make sure we're all talking the same language. That's where the enhanced buffer would go. COMMISSIONER VERNON: Trees. MR. YOVANOVICH: Trees. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Okay. Then the second one -- and, again, in no particular order -- is that the ordinance will be not greater than 108 units rather than 130, and that would bring it to just shy of six dwelling units per acre. Then the next one is that they would add a fence on the west side that you would tie in with the existing fence. Did I say that right? MR. YOVANOVICH: Yes, and it would go along the western boundary from -- you know, basically from here to here. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Okay. All right. Then I think I heard a commitment to this effect, that it would certainly be best practices, and I'd like to see it be a commitment, to stagger the trees in relation to the trees on the other side of the property line. MR. YOVANOVICH: (Nods head.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: And a 3-inch -- 3-foot vinyl fence around A/C units. COMMISSIONER FRY: Is that for the entire development or just -- COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: West side. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Just the west side. 5.A.a Packet Pg. 62 Attachment: 08-19-21CCPC Meeting Minutes - Formatted pdf (19978 : August 19, 2021 CCPC Meeting Minutes) August 19, 2021 Page 58 of 72 COMMISSIONER FRY: Just the west side. MR. YOVANOVICH: And I thought Mr. Schmitt wanted us just to screen those A/C units. I didn't know that you prescribed the method. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Yeah. No, I said vinyl fence rather than a screening. I would -- just a short decorative vinyl fence to help muffle the sound. COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: If they could put shrubs, it would look a lot better. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: If you could do shrubbery. Okay. Either way. COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: Screening, screening. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: I'm fine. Screen. Use the word "screen." Thank you. I'll change. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Screening instead of fence. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Yep. CHAIRMAN FRYER: All right. Have I -- have I omitted -- COMMISSIONER VERNON: Just the timing of the fence, from my perspective, and what's the language you want to use. MR. YOVANOVICH: I'd like to use it as -- let me -- CHAIRMAN FRYER: Go ahead. COMMISSIONER SHEA: While he's doing that -- (Simultaneous crosstalk.) COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: -- to do site cleaning and clearing and leveling and -- COMMISSIONER SHEA: But on that screening, shouldn't we be putting sound absorbing in there? I mean, that's what we're after. If you just put "screening," it could be visual. CHAIRMAN FRYER: How about sound screening? COMMISSIONER SHEA: Yes, I like -- that's what we're after. MR. YOVANOVICH: We would agree that we would build that fence before we went vertical. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Great. MR. YOVANOVICH: Does that make sense? COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Yes. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Okay. And those are the conditions that I heard. Did I omit anything? COMMISSIONER VERNON: You heard he said sound screening is what we're moving -- CHAIRMAN FRYER: Yeah. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Something that will screen the sound, rather than just screen visually around the A/C units. MR. YOVANOVICH: Okay. I understand. Okay. CHAIRMAN FRYER: All right. So I think we've stated the motion. I think we're all in agreement on what the motion is. The motion -- is there a motion to that effect? COMMISSIONER SHEA: I move. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Who was that? COMMISSIONER SHEA: Commissioner Shea moves. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: I'll second. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Is there -- a second from Commissioner Klucik. Any further discussion? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: If not, all in favor of approving this RPUDZ with the named conditions as a recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners, please say aye. COMMISSIONER SHEA: Aye. COMMISSIONER FRY: Aye. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Aye. 5.A.a Packet Pg. 63 Attachment: 08-19-21CCPC Meeting Minutes - Formatted pdf (19978 : August 19, 2021 CCPC Meeting Minutes) August 19, 2021 Page 59 of 72 COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: Aye. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Aye. COMMISSIONER VERNON: Aye. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Aye. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Opposed? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: It passes unanimously. Thank you, Mr. Yovanovich. MR. YOVANOVICH: Thank you. Good luck getting done by 1:30. CHAIRMAN FRYER: ***All right. The next matter to come before us is PL20210001793, which is a proposed GMPA amendment regarding private property rights. It's legislative in nature, so there's no need for swearing in of witnesses and no need for us to declare ex parte communications. With that said, we'll begin with staff's presentation. MR. BOSI: Thank you, Chair. Mike Bosi, Planning and Zoning director. The Florida legislature in their 2021 legislative session passed House Bill 59 to amend the Community Planning Act to require that all jurisdictions, counties, municipalities adopt a private property rights element to their GMP. The proposed Exhibit A provides for the introduction of the private property rights element to the GMP. We have the minimum requirements that are -- the base minimum requirements that are suggested at the state level provided by House Bill 59 contained within the element. It's a single page. Most of these things, I think, are self-evident in terms of what guides us in terms of how we go about in protecting private property rights, but we are codifying it within our GMP, and the Department of Economic Opportunities has provided guidance or provided awareness that jurisdictions will not be able to amend their Growth Management Plan until the private property rights element has been adopted within their Growth Management Plan. MR. KLATZKOW: Mike, do we have any discretion on this? MR. BOSI: No. MR. KLATZKOW: And we, basically, cut and pasted right out of the statute? MR. BOSI: Correct. MR. KLATZKOW: There you go. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: I have one question. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Question. Go ahead, Commissioner Schmitt. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: I clearly understand what the requirement is. And just to clarify what I had heard at the permitting conference, that if an applicant has had an application in the process, small comp plan amendment or otherwise, and it's gone before the LPA, which we are, local planning authority, that it can continue to proceed. But the point of departure was the LPA. Not an application, not anything else. It had to go to the hearing, which brings into question the one that was continued on Pine Ridge. I believe if it was continued -- it had appeared before us. Now, my question is, does -- will they have to go back, and you will have to address these issues as part of that -- MR. BOSI: Because this is a requirement of a full-scale amendment, this will require a transmittal hearing with the Planning Commission and the Board of County Commissioners in an adoption hearing. We probably won't be able to adopt this till December or January. When we adopt -- any subsequent amendments that come before the Planning Commission and the Board of County Commissioners for adoption between that time, we will have to specify when they had their first LPA hearing to make sure that the Department of Economic Opportunity understands that they qualify and they were in the works before that requirement related to the -- COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: All right. Correct. MR. BOSI: Yes. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: And we have to specify. So nobody can submit an 5.A.a Packet Pg. 64 Attachment: 08-19-21CCPC Meeting Minutes - Formatted pdf (19978 : August 19, 2021 CCPC Meeting Minutes) August 19, 2021 Page 60 of 72 application unless it was prior to this being approved. MR. BOSI: You can submit the application. We just would not be allowed -- (Simultaneous crosstalk.) COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: You won't be able to send it. All right. And I have a question on Policy 1.3. Collier County will support the right of the property owner to privacy, clear, and to -- and to execute others -- execute. That's what it sounds like -- to exclude others from the property to protect the owner's possessions and property. That's a pretty broad statement. I mean, that pretty much implies I can do what I need to protect my property. I mean, that's what the legislature intended. MR. BOSI: I think that's what Stand My Ground is. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Yep, Stand My Ground. Okay. Recommend approval as proposed. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Is there a second? COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: Second. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Any further discussion? COMMISSIONER FRY: One question from me. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Yes. Commissioner Fry. COMMISSIONER FRY: What difference will this make in how we conduct business? MR. BOSI: I don't believe it will have a material difference. I believe we try to respect the individual property rights, and the County Attorney makes sure -- ensures that our actions with respect to those rights associated with the bundle of rights that are -- COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: And your staff report's going to have to reflect that these issues have been addressed, probably. MR. BOSI: Correct. COMMISSIONER FRY: So it's an administrative change without any negative cascading consequences in your opinion, in staff's opinion? MR. KLATZKOW: It's nonsense. It's just the legislature just giving us nonsense. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Thank you. I wasn't going to put that on the record, but thank you. CHAIRMAN FRYER: I would go beyond that and say that these -- all the rights that are in this are already a part of the common law or the constitutional or property law, and so -- MR. KLATZKOW: It's no different than, will you guys support the Bill of Rights. I mean, yeah, okay. I mean, you know, it's -- COMMISSIONER FRY: Enough said. Thank you. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Any further questions or comments? COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: I will just simply say that I think it's a worthy exercise to remind everybody and to codify things that seem to be -- you know, get trampled on and forgotten about. So I actually think it's a good idea. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Okay. Any further comments, questions? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: It's been moved and seconded to approve this GMP amendment at transmittal and for recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners, that they also approve it for transmittal to Tallahassee. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Mr. Chairman, I will say that just -- well, I wasn't saying that I think we trample on these rights. I'm saying that our culture seems to be moving in that direction, and so I think it's worthy to highlight that these are rights and that we should respect them. I think we actually -- I've seen -- I've been impressed that this body always seems to, you know, really, really factor in the issue of the private property -- you know, the owners' property rights. So I think we do a great job already. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you. And I agree with you. 5.A.a Packet Pg. 65 Attachment: 08-19-21CCPC Meeting Minutes - Formatted pdf (19978 : August 19, 2021 CCPC Meeting Minutes) August 19, 2021 Page 61 of 72 Any further discussion? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: If not, all those in favor of approval, say aye. COMMISSIONER SHEA: Aye. COMMISSIONER FRY: Aye. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Aye. COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: Aye. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Aye. COMMISSIONER VERNON: Aye. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Aye. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Opposed? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: It passes unanimously. ***The third matter is PL20210001271. It's the EAR-based amendments to the Growth Management Plan concerning sea level rise. Again, this is legislative in nature, so there's no need to swear in witnesses. There's no need to make ex parte disclosures. And with that, the Chair recognizes Mr. Sabo. MR. SABO: Thank you, Mr. Chairman. James Sabo, Comp Planning manager. This is straightforward, as Mr. Bosi has suggested and the County Attorney. These are EAR-based amendments, the Conservation and Coastal Management Element of our Growth Management Plan. Just a little bit background. Legislature approved House Bill 1094. In 2015 it changed the Community Planning Act. In the 2020 legislative session, they required locals to comply with this coastal management. The amendment requires development of strategies to address the impact of sea level rise, flood risk, storm surge, and add language for best practices. Exhibit A is attached. The state DEO also sent us the Evaluation Appraisal Review Notification requiring us to enact these amendments to our GMP. We have until December 31st. And the recommendation is that the Collier County Planning Commission, acting as the land planning agency, forward the proposed CCME amendments to the Board of County Commissioners with a recommendation to adopt and transmit. I'll entertain any questions. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you. Commissioner Schmitt. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: First of all, how many counties submit an EAR report? My understanding, of all the counties in Florida, there may be one, maybe two, one being Collier County, and I'm not sure the other. MR. SABO: I don't know. I'd have to research that, but it sounds like it's just us and one other county. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: That's pretty much what I heard at the permitting conference as well; there's nobody that submits an EAR. And I don't even know if it's statutorily required anymore. But you have to comply with this. MR. SABO: Correct. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Objective 14.1, I'm going to ask just questions as we go down. December 23, date to address issues related to sea level rise. And I'm going to be somewhat, I guess, critical, but I could wake up in the morning and consider it and say thank you and move on to drinking a cup of coffee. What -- what is it -- what are your plans from there? And the second thing, it says, to remove property from the flood zone. Well, I mean, there's costs associated with that. Every one of these elements have an element of cost. But you have not categorized any cost to any of these aspects. Is that part of the -- as you go through the 5.A.a Packet Pg. 66 Attachment: 08-19-21CCPC Meeting Minutes - Formatted pdf (19978 : August 19, 2021 CCPC Meeting Minutes) August 19, 2021 Page 62 of 72 planning process? MR. SABO: We -- our understanding was we took the state legislative act from 2015 and we copy and pasted, as Mr. Klatzkow has mentioned, into our GMP the requirements from the state, and that's as much explanation as I can provide. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: All right. So the state -- the 14.4, the state states that the county shall consider possible impacts to climate change. Again, I woke up in the morning, I considered it, and I brushed my teeth had a cup of coffee and came to work. I mean, did they define any intent? MR. SABO: No, I -- COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: You don't know. MR. SABO: We just took the act, and cut and paste. It's pretty straightforward. It did not take me a long time to write this. MR. KLATZKOW: In the meantime, they're allowing condos being build in Miami, like, one foot above sea level. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Thank you. That's the next point. I mean, it's to the point of all these. And I -- my neighbor's in the legislature; I was going to bust his chops about some of these. But it's all noteworthy stuff. But encourages the use of best practices of the developer -- developing principles, strategies, engineering solutions that result in the removal of coastal real estate property from the flood zone designations. Great, until I tell everybody on Vanderbilt Beach you have to move. That ain't going to happen, to be blunt, to use "ain't" as a correct English. MR. SABO: Understood. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: So, I mean, these are all interesting, but I just find it interesting because the other aspect of it is the ongoing study that's being conducted, and the feasibility study that's being -- supposed to have out a chief's report here in October, which is on the Board of County Commissioners meeting in September. But it's -- again, we considered it, thank you very much, and move on, because there's -- from an engineering point, there's only three ways you deal with this. One is you just don't deal with it; noted, thank you. Two, you compensate, meaning tell people they have to move and somehow they compensate. Or, three, we force compliance, and still that's going to be monies involved in whether you're hardening, whether -- whatever element you're going to perform from a standpoint of flood protecting and floodproofing buildings. It's all notable, but it's, quite honestly, physically infeasible. MR. KLATZKOW: Yes, and we just passed a motion on a private property rights -- COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Right. MR. KLATZKOW: -- Comp Plan amendment just a few minutes ago which has nothing to do with these rights. COMMISSIONER FRY: We just took them away. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: It's remarkable, and -- but I'm just curious, once this is approved, what's the plan after that? Policy 14.3, the county shall continue to support Chapter 161 of the Florida Statutes -- okay, fine -- which sets forth guidelines for the regulation of beach construction and reconstruction, beach and shore preservation. I mean, we do that anyways. I would recommend approval. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Commissioner, do you think -- (Simultaneous crosstalk.) COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: I'm just kind of curious to -- CHAIRMAN FRYER: -- politics entered into this at all? COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: No, not at all. Not at all. I'm not suggesting that politics would get into politics. I'm just curious as to, once this gets into the Comp Plan, what does this force the staff to do? You have to come up with a plan -- 5.A.a Packet Pg. 67 Attachment: 08-19-21CCPC Meeting Minutes - Formatted pdf (19978 : August 19, 2021 CCPC Meeting Minutes) August 19, 2021 Page 63 of 72 (Simultaneous crosstalk.) MR. SABO: That's a great question, Commissioner. And if -- the word "consider" doesn't have a lot of teeth to it, so, yes, agreed. Well, we considered this, and it sounds like a good idea to go in this direction. Unless we have money or funding to support some sort of action, that's just what we'll do; we'll consider it. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: As I said, woke up in the morning, thank you, go -- now drink a cup of coffee, then brush my teeth, then come to work. No, that's -- it's interesting. I'm just curious as the -- this will be -- the changes will be noted, and I recommend approval. I just don't know what -- there's no other action required for you to follow up with any type of report and noticing to the state what you intend to do in order to combat climate change or anything else. MR. SABO: That may be future legislation in the statutes, but -- (Simultaneous crosstalk.) COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: I mean, it truly is something that the county's been talking about for years in regards to shore protection and other type of elements. And I could talk for a half hour on my experiences in the Army Corps of Engineers and the kind of things that that brings, and, of course, what it brings to the county, both funding but also a significant change in beach access and other type of things with the county because of federal funds. But with that, I would recommend approval, and it will look nice on the shelf with these nice new words in it. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you. Commissioner Shea. COMMISSIONER SHEA: So what's the definition of a coastal area? Does everybody know whether they're in the coastal area or not? It just says "in coastal areas." COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Either the -- (Simultaneous crosstalk.) THE COURT REPORTER: I can only get one at a time. MR. SABO: There's a Coastal Construction Control Line. That's one. There's a Coastal High Hazard Area that Mr. Summers uses. That's another. COMMISSIONER SHEA: Are they different? MR. SABO: Yes. COMMISSIONER SHEA: So which one are we talking about here? CHAIRMAN FRYER: It's going to be something that the staff is going to have to further define. COMMISSIONER SHEA: Well, it just seems -- I'm like you. I just see so much silliness in there. I mean, is this saying that by December 23 you have to develop plans that will address those issues? Inappropriate and unsafe development's not defined. You're going to define that by December 23rd. "When opportunities arise," are you going to define what an opportunity is by December 2023? Is that what I'm reading? MR. SABO: That's what the legislature has put forward to us, and we -- that 2023 deadline, you know, we may be done by then. We may not. I don't know that there's any penalties. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Well, in reality, the ongoing feasibility study being conducted by the Army Corps of Engineers meets the requirement. Whether you choose to become a nonfederal sponsor, whether you choose to proceed is irrelevant. But, frankly, the feasibility study meets the requirement. You considered it. And you could cite that as considered. And I'm not sure if you're aware of that ongoing study. COMMISSIONER SHEA: The one the Corps' doing? COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Yes. COMMISSIONER SHEA: Savarese is doing it. Michael Savarese is doing it. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Commissioner Fry, go ahead, sir. 5.A.a Packet Pg. 68 Attachment: 08-19-21CCPC Meeting Minutes - Formatted pdf (19978 : August 19, 2021 CCPC Meeting Minutes) August 19, 2021 Page 64 of 72 COMMISSIONER SHEA: Can I finish? CHAIRMAN FRYER: Oh, I'm so sorry. Of course. COMMISSIONER SHEA: Yeah. The -- I just -- I'm more of an engineer, so I get into the details of Federal Emergency Management Agency. They establish a flood zone, but they have multiple flood zones. So which flood zone is it? I mean -- COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: I think Jamie French probably could highlight that. He's our floodplain manager. I'll give him that. How's that for a title today? MR. FRENCH: Thank you, Joe, Commissioner Schmitt. Again, Jamie French, for the record. Deputy department head. And, for the record, I am a certified floodplain manager, so thank you for the acknowledgment. But I am not the floodplain administrator for this county. Luckily I've been able to pass that on to staff, so -- folks much more qualified than me. The -- Commissioner Shea, you spoke of definitions, and those definitions for those flood zones, coastal construction lines, those are already identified within our Land Development Code under definitions. They exist under 1.802. So they're identified. And we do -- and the short answer is, is that -- and I know this from experience and working on the recovery of Hurricane Michael a few years ago up in the Panhandle. There are a number of communities throughout the state of Florida that do not recognize NFIP, and they don't practice NFIP. And the state has made a valiant effort to mitigate claims and mitigate response. And as a result of this -- and I'm only speaking for me in my professional opinion -- is this is just one step forward to force many of those communities through model floodplain ordinances that we have adopted as well as through the Florida Building Code and development standards to ensure the safety of our communities throughout the state of Florida. So we believe that just looking at this, this is just another element that will be a consideration that will be brought in through the land development planning aspect versus only the Florida Building Code as well as through flood insurance policies. But so you know, Collier County is considered by the floodplain office through the Department of Emergency Response, Collier is one of those model communities. So many of these things that we're talking about here we've already initiated. We are in a study right now. When Amy was heading up the Capital Planning group before she moved up to the County Manager's, she's been intimately involved with FGCU and the University of Florida for the past three years. So we're involved with the studies that are going on with FGCU and the University of Florida, and there will be more to come as we start to formulate those plans. We don't believe that some of those plans belong in a GMP language because they're far too specific, and that will be in policy making. And so you'll see those come forward in future years. But to the credit of staff and to answer your questions, we are working on this right now. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: And we're already in the NFIP. MR. FRENCH: Right. And if you remember, through Naples One, we talked about that lim wall, and that's your limited -- and that's a new definition that has been brought in to be defined as far as types of construction and types of uses that can exist within those lim wall areas that are just beyond that are on the landward side of that Coastal Construction Setback Line. So, again, there's a great deal more enhancements that are coming throughout the entire state of Florida that are already in place. And, again -- but we've never really had any type of, I want to say, language that existed on the planning side that really enhance this. So, it's -- again, we'll be bringing this back to you in future years. COMMISSIONER SHEA: So when I read something like 14.4, under this you're going to come back on how we're going to consider potential future impacts of climate change. Things like -- you're going to address those types of things. This document is just saying what our plan is going to do. It's not saying what our plan is, right? MR. FRENCH: And I would defer to Mr. Bosi, but I think this is just the -- more so language that says we're going to commit to a plan in the future. COMMISSIONER SHEA: In the future, okay. 5.A.a Packet Pg. 69 Attachment: 08-19-21CCPC Meeting Minutes - Formatted pdf (19978 : August 19, 2021 CCPC Meeting Minutes) August 19, 2021 Page 65 of 72 CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you. Commissioner Fry. COMMISSIONER FRY: Jamie, I'm just looking to learn something here. I see repeated reference, you mention the coastal construction, and they've struck out "setback" and they call it the Coastal Construction Control Line. Is that actually a line on a series of maps that -- a certain setback from the ocean, I mean, from the gulf that -- MR. FRENCH: It is. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: It's on the Future Land Use Map. It's clearly identified in the Future Land -- COMMISSIONER FRY: Is it a few feet from the beach, or is it -- COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: It depends on where you're at in the county. COMMISSIONER FRY: It varies. MR. FRENCH: It's based on the topography, and those studies and those -- and we do go through a series of map updates. And I remember being first involved when Joe was heading up the organization, and we're still in the appeal process from 12 years ago with FEMA on where we've independently gone through and assessed what they've presented to us as best available data. And based off those questions, that model may change, that map may change. But typically what happens is that FEMA and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, they may use a third-party contractor to come in and to assess, and that's recently been done. And so once it's -- once it's filed in D.C., then we have an appeal period. And we've been following that through our floodplain management staff. COMMISSIONER FRY: So the idea is that there's a line, and you really -- this is saying you can't build between that line and the gulf and the coast unless it's some kind of special purpose that's needed? And that's what -- I'm looking at 10.4.7. MR. FRENCH: It defines standards of construction and types of uses that can exist within those areas. It doesn't necessarily say you can't construct, because you can, but there's -- COMMISSIONER FRY: Right. There's exceptions. MR. FRENCH: There's steps that you need to follow in order to be able to construct in those areas. COMMISSIONER FRY: Thank you. COMMISSIONER SHEA: Vanderbilt Beach is -- CHAIRMAN FRYER: All right. No one else is signaling. Are we -- Mr. Bosi? MR. BOSI: Oh, just to let the Planning Commission know, 1.08 is our definitions section of our LDC, and it does define the coastal zone. It's a pretty lengthy definition. But it refers to all lands and territorial waters west of SLOSH Zone 1 line, approximately U.S. 41 for most of the county, including waters and submerged lands of oceanic bodies and estuary bodies. It goes on for another couple sentences. But we do have a definition within our LDC for what defines the coastal zone. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you. No one is signaling. Anyone else want to be heard at this point? If not, I'd entertain a motion. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Recommend approval as written. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Is there a second? COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: Second. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Any further discussion? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: If not, all those in favor, please say aye. COMMISSIONER SHEA: Aye. COMMISSIONER FRY: Aye. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Aye. COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: Aye. 5.A.a Packet Pg. 70 Attachment: 08-19-21CCPC Meeting Minutes - Formatted pdf (19978 : August 19, 2021 CCPC Meeting Minutes) August 19, 2021 Page 66 of 72 COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Aye. COMMISSIONER VERNON: Aye. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Aye. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Opposed? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: It passes unanimously. Thank you. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Go forth and study. CHAIRMAN FRYER: ***Then we go to old business, and I don't believe we have any old business, which takes us to new business. And this was the work product of our County Attorney. And if memory serves, it was by unanimous consensus on our part that we requested the County Attorney to draft a proposed resolution to serve as an addition to our rules of procedure as permitted by Section 2-1159 of Board of County Commissioners Resolution 98-167. Now, personally I believe the whereas clauses in the proposed resolution clearly set out the reasons why -- at least the reasons that we cited why we believe there's a need for clarification and action to address the recent proliferation of 11th-hour requests for continuation. But before I open it up for discussion, I'll look to the County Attorney, sir, and ask if you have any additional comments or opening remarks to offer us. MR. KLATZKOW: No. This will be your policy. This is just a proposal. I mean, this was a joint effort between my office and staff and, you know, it's your prerogative. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you. Okay. I'd open it up for questions and comments from the Planning Commission. COMMISSIONER FRY: One question. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Commissioner Fry. COMMISSIONER FRY: Did we in our -- in our discussion of this, Jeff, did we come up with the $1,000 fee, or is that something that was arrived at by your department? I'm just curious. MR. KLATZKOW: That was a staff recommendation. COMMISSIONER FRY: Staff recommendation. So the intent of that fee is that it's -- it allays more of the cost to the county of the readvertisement, et cetera, but it's not prohibitive or punitive to the applicant; kind of a middle ground. CHAIRMAN FRYER: It's not -- it's not a fine. It's cost recovery. COMMISSIONER FRY: Cost recovery. MR. BOSI: And one of the other aspects we did not include was a draft, but we didn't go in -- didn't propose, but we did want to discuss with you. We thought one of the -- that maybe is more punitive -- and it's not monetary, but it's time. And if you ask for a continuation, if you -- if the regulation was or what the rule was, you could not come back within a six-week period, one, you would require them -- one, have to readvertise their petition for when it would be going back to the Board of County Commissioners but, two, you'd be taking up the thing that's probably a little bit more valuable to them, and that's time. So just for one of the considerations, if you wanted to -- if they asked for a continuation, pushed them out a specific period of time, that may be more punitive, and it would result, in my perspective, in probably a greater hesitation to ask for that continuation if you penalize them not just monetarily but from a time perspective. COMMISSIONER FRY: But right now we're upping the fee from $250 to $1,000; is that right? MR. BOSI: I believe it's 500 to $1,000. COMMISSIONER FRY: It's 500. Doubling the fee. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you. Commissioner Vernon. COMMISSIONER VERNON: Yeah. A few things caught my eye, but one of them was the thousand dollars, and I don't think the thousand dollars is going to be a deterrent at all. So we either need a -- if we're going to use it as a -- not punitive but as a deterrent so it happens less than 5.A.a Packet Pg. 71 Attachment: 08-19-21CCPC Meeting Minutes - Formatted pdf (19978 : August 19, 2021 CCPC Meeting Minutes) August 19, 2021 Page 67 of 72 it has, I think we -- MR. KLATZKOW: The thousand dollars is to just cover our costs. That's the only purpose of it. If you're looking for something more punitive, I think Mr. Bosi's idea as to give them a greater length of time to sit on it would be appropriate. COMMISSIONER VERNON: Again, you know, I know there's a fine line between deterrent and punitive. I'm trying to deter them from doing this as much as they have been. And so I think the six weeks, as long as that's legal, I think that's probably a good idea as opposed to trying to amp up the number even to, you know -- such big numbers are involved in some of these projects, I don't think a dollar fine is going to really change their decision of whether they want to push it back for strategic reasons. MR. KLATZKOW: Yeah. And the structure of this, I took what staff had and then I restructured it, really, using both the federal and state continuance policies. So it's sort of my thought process, you're a quasi-judicial board. There's not that much difference between you guys and a county judge. When somebody asks for a continuance, this is your docket. This is time. You want to kick them out three months, it's okay by me, because they've got other people in line. You know, you could say, okay, you've got to continue [sic], but then you go to the back of the line on this, whatever time that might be. But, again, this is your policy. CHAIRMAN FRYER: And before I call on other commissioners, if I may, following up on the language that the County Attorney just used, I suggest that we call this a continuance policy rather than a continuation policy. Would anybody object to that? COMMISSIONER VERNON: No. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Okay. All right. Commissioner Schmitt. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Yeah. My biggest concern is exactly what Jeff said. In the past when this happens, it -- the person that gets hurt is the next person in line, because the staff works to get this -- the petitioner to this point, to get to public hearing, and to present it to us, and then they continue. My concern is, hey, go -- yeah, go back to the end of the line, because you've had six other petitions now in line. I would like to leave that up to staff to say you have -- I now have five petitions in the queue, and you're behind them, because they were disadvantaged, and one of those petitions could have had the place that these people just got here to continue. That's what I'm trying to make sure, that this is painful for them to do it. (Simultaneous crosstalk.) COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: I can't think of a way to put that into words other than it gives staff the right to determine where this will be placed in the queue. If there's sufficient justification, whatever may have happened, misadvertisement or some, you know, community wasn't notified, those are mitigating and extenuating circumstances. But I want to make sure that those who were in line aren't disadvantaged because now this guy's coming back again two weeks from now. So I don't know how -- COMMISSIONER SHEA: Can we just say "next available slot"? COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Next available slot. COMMISSIONER SHEA: Then that gives staff the right to determine. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Gives you the latitude. Thank you. That's good wording. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Well, to me, that -- actually, I think that binds -- that binds staff more than I think we should, because what that says is they would be entitled to a certain spot. I think we can -- if we give them -- like, you can't come back for a certain period of meetings or weeks -- COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Well, they're going to be entitled anyway. They have every right to appear before the Planning Commission to present their petition. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: No. But what I'm saying is if you say the next available 5.A.a Packet Pg. 72 Attachment: 08-19-21CCPC Meeting Minutes - Formatted pdf (19978 : August 19, 2021 CCPC Meeting Minutes) August 19, 2021 Page 68 of 72 slot, then the staff has to give them the next available slot, and they -- which I think they now have flexibility to schedule how they need to and how they see fit. And to bind them to give them the next available slot, I think, is actually going beyond what they even need to do now. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Yeah. I think we need to be cautious in our wording here because in the final analysis, the order of agenda belongs to us as the Planning Commission, and staff makes a recommendation, and applicants usually rely on that. But when the agendas come to us for action, you know, addenda to the agenda is an item on our agenda, and that's a place where we need to speak up, and if we think that the order that staff has assigned to a matter that's been continued is inappropriate, we can override that. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: And I think if we bind them -- if we bind -- we would be binding ourselves as well, because then we would be obligated to give them the next available slot, and if we wanted to swap somebody for a good reason, we wouldn't necessarily be able to do that. CHAIRMAN FRYER: What about the next appropriate spot? COMMISSIONER VERNON: Well, I -- can I jump in? CHAIRMAN FRYER: Please. COMMISSIONER VERNON: Yeah. I just think what Jeff and Mike are recommending, and I think Robb's supporting, is that -- I mean, we can always do an exception, but make it at least six weeks. So I don't like the idea of putting staff in the position of having a subjective decision to make on this issue. Again, going back, what are we trying to accomplish here? We're trying to reduce if not eliminate these last-minute continuances. So what's the best way to do that? And I think it's they see this in writing, it's going to be six weeks. Now they have to redo this, redo this, redo this automatically. And we can -- if we want to give an exception for good cause, we can, but I like it that it's in writing it's going to be six weeks or more. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: I like that wording with the discretion up to the Planning Commission if it's going to be less. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Mr. Bosi and then Commissioner Fry. MR. BOSI: And I appreciate that, Commissioner Vernon. And what I also think you're able to do with that six weeks -- that six-week period is you're able to provide that rational nexus as a justification to that period that it requires. And it's for the protection of the public, and it requires that the petition is readvertised. It requires that the notification to the people who came to the meeting that was being continued will be notified of when that meeting is being continued again so, therefore, it's not an arbitrary time period. It's a time period that you've chosen specifically because the end result is a requirement for readvertising that petition. So, therefore, I think you're justified and protected in terms of how you've arrived upon the time frame if you do seek a continuation. And remember the Board of -- or the Planning Commission is going to evaluate whether it's good cause or not good cause. So you're the ones who will make the determination if you find it's not good cause, and then, therefore, they will have to obligate themselves to that six-week continuance, and that's simply to allow for the public to be notified of the new date. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Commissioner Fry. COMMISSIONER FRY: So, I mean, the objective of this is to reduce wholesale and egregious continuances. Now, in addition to doubling the fine, we've also had them submit in advance in writing that's then distributed to us and to select people at staff's discretion. We've asked them to have the representatives all available here to present and justify their continuance. So I guess I'd be supportive of the six-week as long as we're not -- we could, in cases where we felt it was an excusable continuance, where we could schedule it more quickly. So as long as that's the intent we have here, that we could go -- that's our standard is six weeks, but we could decide to schedule it sooner. MR. BOSI: And I think it was added at the -- or at the Planning Commission's discretion. COMMISSIONER VERNON: That's what Joe suggested, that we actually put those 5.A.a Packet Pg. 73 Attachment: 08-19-21CCPC Meeting Minutes - Formatted pdf (19978 : August 19, 2021 CCPC Meeting Minutes) August 19, 2021 Page 69 of 72 words in, six weeks. COMMISSIONER FRY: The standard is six weeks, but at our discretion, or it could be reduced -- MR. BOSI: If you're continued beyond the six-week period, you -- and it's a five-week period, you'll have to readvertise, so that's why we've chose -- that's why we suggested six weeks. But what Joe had said, that that is at the discretion of the Planning Commission. That would be -- that would be the time frame unless there's extenuating circumstances in the perspective of the Planning Commission. COMMISSIONER VERNON: Yeah. I mean, the way I'd word it is that it is going to be six weeks, comma, unless the Planning Commissioner decides otherwise, and that gives us the discretion, if we think it's appropriate, to let them back before us quicker. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: I mean, there may be reasons a petitioner -- people can't show up for whatever reason, and it's a legitimate reason. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Is that how it's worded now? COMMISSIONER FRY: It's not in there at all. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: There is no provision now. They just -- they can ask for -- COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: No, I mean, in what we're considering, is that wording in there now, or do we need to modify what's before us? COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: We need to modify. COMMISSIONER FRY: Jeff, you did not include that verbiage in this draft. MR. KLATZKOW: No. I mean, after this discussion I'll get together with Mike, and we'll make some changes and we'll bring them back. COMMISSIONER VERNON: And I have some minor changes that, if it's okay with the Planning Commission, fellow commissioners, I'll just chat with them about it. I don't think I need to discuss it. There is one more thing that I would like to discuss, though, and that's No. 2 of these three points of what's good cause to continue it, where denial of the continuance creates injustice for the requesting party. You know, as an attorney, I think you could always find some type of injustice, you know. I'm not going to get paid as much. MR. KLATZKOW: Yeah. A lot of this language I pulled out of existing judicial policies for continuances. COMMISSIONER VERNON: Yeah. So I don't know. To me that's a little fuzzy. So I don't know how -- CHAIRMAN FRYER: What about severe -- severe injustice? COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Would you believe me if I told you -- COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: We're surrounded by three attorneys here. No, four now. COMMISSIONER VERNON: You know, I don't know what the right language is. I mean, I'd like to -- if it's okay with the Planning Commission -- just chat with you off-line -- because you're going to be bringing something up again -- and see if we can clean that up a little bit. CHAIRMAN FRYER: That's fine. Yeah, this is coming back to us, and so further comments should be directed to the County Attorney or staff or both. What -- MR. KLATZKOW: Would you prefer unduly prejudices? COMMISSIONER VERNON: It's almost like unfair prejudice. Everything's prejudice. So unfair, unduly, something like that. Unfair prejudice. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Well, we'll see this again in redline form. Any further comments before we send it back for further review? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: All right. Then let's have a motion to continue this matter to a date certain, I think, if we can. Can we not? 5.A.a Packet Pg. 74 Attachment: 08-19-21CCPC Meeting Minutes - Formatted pdf (19978 : August 19, 2021 CCPC Meeting Minutes) August 19, 2021 Page 70 of 72 MR. KLATZKOW: Oh, you'll have it at your next Planning Commission. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Okay. Continue this to the next Planning Commission meeting for us to consider a second draft of this -- MR. BOSI: September 2nd. COMMISSIONER FRY: So moved. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Is there a second? COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Second. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Further discussion? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: If not, all those in favor, please say aye. COMMISSIONER SHEA: Aye. COMMISSIONER FRY: Aye. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Aye. COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: Aye. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Aye. COMMISSIONER VERNON: Aye. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Aye. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Opposed? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: It passes unanimously. Very quickly, I'm going to want to introduce -- and I mean very quickly, because I want to get out of here as much as you do -- another matter of new business that came up today, and I'm just going to say it in a sentence, and we can -- we all can weigh in on it or not, and it has to do with the 500-feet notification limit that exists in many parts of the unincorporated county. I would like us to ask staff to come back with a recommendation for enlarging that for us to discuss and consider. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Can I add to that? CHAIRMAN FRYER: Please. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: I would ask, in doing that, if staff could go back and look at the record, because this is -- had come up in the past -- and just look at the reasons why. And it goes back many years. There may have been reasons why we limited it to 500 feet, and I -- because at one time I know we talked a thousand, and it's a thousand for commercial; is it not? MR. BELLOWS: It's a thousand if you're in the rural area of the Estates. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: But I -- I just caution, because -- if you could go back and look and see why -- if there's any type of record as to -- we did discuss this in the past. Not me, personally, on the Planning Commission, but I remember as part of staff this had been discussed, and it was settled on 500. Just come back with that as well. CHAIRMAN FRYER: I think that's certainly reasonable. The thing that concerns me is that everybody in Canopy didn't get notice, and that just seems fundamentally wrong. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Just to highlight -- and I mean, I can think of the same things. In communities the size of Fiddler's Creek or Lely or some of the other communities, somebody says, well, we weren't notified -- and Lely is 8- or 9,000 units. I mean, if it's on the corner of 41 and Collier Boulevard, do you notify the guys over there -- it's -- MR. KLATZKOW: The idea is that you notify the neighbors. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Notify the neighbors. MR. KLATZKOW: Not the neighboring community. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: Correct. MR. KLATZKOW: That was the idea. And we have talked about this before. The 500 -- it was not just made up. There were graphics showing what this would mean -- (Simultaneous crosstalk.) MR. KLATZKOW: -- as far as to how many addresses would take place and what have 5.A.a Packet Pg. 75 Attachment: 08-19-21CCPC Meeting Minutes - Formatted pdf (19978 : August 19, 2021 CCPC Meeting Minutes) August 19, 2021 Page 71 of 72 you. But staff will bring it back. But keep in mind the idea is we're notifying the neighbors who are going to get impacted of what's going on, not the neighboring community, which as Joe said, could be just extensively large. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Mr. Chairman? CHAIRMAN FRYER: Yeah. Go ahead, Commissioner. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: In this particular instance with the Canopy being notified, so what I would say is, you know, unless there was, you know, a really obvious screwup with our notification process that staff did not send out, you know, the notifications required, which I think they -- you know, I don't have any reason at this point to think that we didn't do the proper notifications with the 500 feet. You had a parcel right there adjacent that was wooded. That's owned by the association. So the association was sent a letter. And then all the people that are adjacent and within 500 feet, you know, the 40 or 50 homes, all got a letter, and that's just in Canopy. And there's a sign right on one of the main roads that everybody's traversing on both corners or, you know, both sides of that. And so I think the idea is the community has a chance to know something's happening so that they can raise, you know, concerns if they want to. And the idea that all 200 homes or whatever would -- you know, would need to be notified, I think that seems to go beyond making sure people have a meaningful chance to be aware that something's happening, especially with the signage, and we did -- you know, the signage, apparently, was increased in size. And, you know, I certainly am in a community where we have these things going on all the time, and everybody starts buzzing about it, and not everybody gets a letter about it. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Would anyone object if we asked the staff to take another look at this? COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: No, I have no objection. COMMISSIONER VERNON: No, I think it's a great idea. And along Joe's comments, look at how we came up with the 500 feet. There's also -- I know we had a discussion last year about it -- I think it came up -- about the rural areas, and I remember Paul making some -- I just kind of remember the thousand feet. And so can you take a look at that discussion, too, because that will sort of help me if we know what thoughts we've already had on this issue, even if it was just on the rural. COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: We just changed it, though. MR. BOSI: Yeah, you just changed the notification requirements for all Estates lots from 1,000 feet to one mile. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: That's a lot. COMMISSIONER VERNON: That is big. MR. BOSI: It is. And one of the things that you guys have to remember -- have to remember, everything that we do that adds cost doesn't get pushed to the developer. It gets pushed to the end user. And we have an affordability issue in this county. And just -- I'm not saying anything other than every action has a reaction, and understand that some of these things that we ask for have a cumulative effect in terms of what they -- what they're -- the end result in terms of purchasing and the price of a home. Just -- and we will most certainly provide that -- the original 500 feet and then the discussion about the 1,000 feet and beyond, provide you a backdrop, and see if you would like us to take some actions upon it. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you. COMMISSIONER VERNON: And I think that will help us look at things comprehensively and not sort of knee-jerked and inconsistencies. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Good. Thank you. You've got our input, and we look forward to hearing back from you. Is there any further new business? (No response.) 5.A.a Packet Pg. 76 Attachment: 08-19-21CCPC Meeting Minutes - Formatted pdf (19978 : August 19, 2021 CCPC Meeting Minutes) August 19, 2021 Page 72 of 72 CHAIRMAN FRYER: If not, any public comment? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: I don't think there are any members of the public remaining here, so I take it there are not. COMMISSIONER SCHMITT: We have six more minutes to keep Terri here, so we can keep on talking. CHAIRMAN FRYER: No. We're going to be merciful. Without objection, we are adjourned. ******* There being no further business for the good of the County, the meeting was adjourned by order of the Chair at 1:24 p.m. COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION _____________________________________ EDWIN FRYER, CHAIRMAN These minutes approved by the Board on __________, as presented __________ or as corrected _________. TRANSCRIPT PREPARED ON BEHALF OF U.S. LEGAL SUPPORT, INC., BY TERRI L. LEWIS, RPR, FPR, COURT REPORTER AND NOTARY PUBLIC. 5.A.a Packet Pg. 77 Attachment: 08-19-21CCPC Meeting Minutes - Formatted pdf (19978 : August 19, 2021 CCPC Meeting Minutes) 09/16/2021 COLLIER COUNTY Collier County Planning Commission Item Number: 9.A.1 Item Summary: PL20200001827 PUDZ RCMA Immokalee - An Ordinance of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida amending Ordinance Number 2004-41, as amended, the Collier County Land Development Code, which established the comprehensive zoning regulations for the unincorporated area of Collier County, Florida, by amending the appropriate zoning atlas map or maps by changing the zoning classification of the herein described real property from a Rural Agricultural (A) Zoning District within the Immokalee Area Overlay and the Wellfield Risk Management Special Treatment Overlay Zones W-1 through W-4 to a Mixed-Use Planned Unit Development (MPUD) Zoning District within the Immokalee Area Overlay and the Wellfield Risk Management Special Treatment Overlay Zones W-1 through W-4 for the project to be known as RCMA Immokalee MPUD, to allow construction of a 250 student childcare center (pre-school), 700 student school, community center and a maximum of 160 multi-family residential dwelling units on property located at the northwest quadrant of Lake Trafford Road and Carson Road, in Section 31, Township 46 South, Range 29 East, consisting of 62.22± acres; and by providing an effective date. [Coordinator: Timothy Finn, AICP, Principal Planner] Meeting Date: 09/16/2021 Prepared by: Title: – Zoning Name: Tim Finn 08/30/2021 4:38 PM Submitted by: Title: – Zoning Name: Mike Bosi 08/30/2021 4:38 PM Approved By: Review: Zoning Ray Bellows Additional Reviewer Completed 09/02/2021 5:30 PM Planning Commission Diane Lynch Review item Completed 09/03/2021 2:29 PM Growth Management Operations & Regulatory Management Donna Guitard Review Item Completed 09/07/2021 10:20 AM Zoning Mike Bosi Zoning Director Review Completed 09/07/2021 11:53 AM Growth Management Department James C French GMD Deputy Dept Head Completed 09/07/2021 5:14 PM Planning Commission Edwin Fryer Meeting Pending 09/16/2021 9:00 AM 9.A.1 Packet Pg. 78 PUDZ-PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee MPUD Page 1 of 15 Revised: September 2, 2021 STAFF REPORT TO: COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: ZONING DIVISION – ZONING SERVICES SECTION GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT HEARING DATE: SEPTEMBER 16, 2021 SUBJECT: PUDZ-PL20200001827; RCMA IMMOKALEE MPUD ______________________________________________________________________________ OWNERS/CONTRACT PURCHASER/AGENT: Owners: Barron Collier Partnership, LLLP 2600 Golden Gate Parkway #200 Naples, FL 34105 Contract Purchaser/Applicant: Agent: Redlands Christian Migrant Association, Inc. D. Wayne Arnold, AICP 402 West Main Street Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. Immokalee, FL 34112 3800 Via Del Ray Bonita Springs, FL 34134 REQUESTED ACTION: The petitioner is requesting that the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) consider an application to rezone property from a Rural Agricultural (A) Zoning District within the Immokalee Area Overlay and the Wellfield Risk Management Special Treatment Overlay Zones W-1 through W-4 to a Mixed-Use Planned Unit Development (MPUD) Zoning District within the Immokalee Area Overlay and the Wellfield Risk Management Special Treatment Overlay Zones W-1 through W-4 for the project to be known as RCMA Immokalee MPUD, to allow construction of a 250 student childcare center (pre-school), 700 student school, community center and a maximum of 160 multi-family residential dwelling units. The subject property is comprised of one parcel and is owned by Barron Collier Partnership, LLLP. GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The subject property is located at the northwest quadrant of Lake Trafford Road and Carson Road, in Section 31, Township 46 South, Range 29 East, Collier County, Florida, consisting of 62.22+/- acres (see location map on page 2). 9.A.1.a Packet Pg. 79 Attachment: Staff Report - RCMA Immokalee PUDZ (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) PUDZ-PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee MPUD Page 2 of 15 Revised: September 2, 2021 PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: This petition seeks to rezone the property to MPUD to allow for the development of a 250-student childcare center (preschool), 700 student school, community center, and a maximum of 160 residential dwelling units. 9.A.1.a Packet Pg. 80 Attachment: Staff Report - RCMA Immokalee PUDZ (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) PUDZ-PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee MPUD Page 3 of 15 Revised: September 2, 2021 SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING: This section of the staff report identifies the land uses, zoning classifications, and maximum approved densities for properties surrounding boundaries of RCMA Immokalee MPUD: North: Undeveloped land, then to the east is developed with single family residential and mobile homes with a zoning designation of Village Residential (VR) District. East: Developed with mobile homes, with a zoning designation of Mobile Home (MH) District, then to the south is developed with a church, with a zoning designation of Public Use (P) District, then to the south is developed with Immokalee Water and Sewer, with a zoning designation of Public Use (P) District, then to the south is developed with Immokalee Fire Control with a zoning designation of Agricultural (A) District then to the south at the northwest corner of Carson Road and Lake Trafford Road is developed commercial with a zoning designation of Commercial Intermediate (C-3) District. To the east of Carson Road (local road) is developed with a water management area with a zoning designation of Harvest for Humanity PUD (2.73 DU/AC), which is approved for single and multifamily, educational/college, water management detention areas, conservation areas, and recreational uses. South: Lake Trafford Road (local road), then developed with single family residential with undeveloped vacant land with a zoning designation of Arrowhead MPUD (4.03 DU/AC) which is approved for single and multi-family residential, open space areas, preserve areas, and commercial areas. West: Undeveloped land, then to the west is developed with Lake Trafford Elementary School with a zoning designation of Agricultural (A) District, then to the north is developed with single family residential with a zoning designation of Liberty Landing RPUD (6.03 DU/AC) which is approved for single and multi-family residential, water management, preserve, and recreational areas. Intentionally blank 9.A.1.a Packet Pg. 81 Attachment: Staff Report - RCMA Immokalee PUDZ (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) PUDZ-PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee MPUD Page 4 of 15 Revised: September 2, 2021 Aerial Photo (Property Appraiser (GIS) GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN (GMP) CONSISTENCY: Future Land Use Element (FLUE): The 62.2-acre subject site is designated Urban, Urban Mixed-Use District, Low Residential Subdistrict on the Immokalee Future Land Use Map. It is zoned Agricultural. Urban Mixed-Use District allows both public and private schools as well as residential and community facilities. The applicant is requesting a MPUD with a maximum of 700 students in K-8, 250 student pre-school, 5000 square feet Intermediate Commercial (C-3). The applicant is requesting low density Multi Family housing (up to 160 MF DUs on 63 acres, which is 2.5 DU/A which is consistent with the IAMP). The requested uses are all consistent with the Immokalee Area Master Plan. The project is a unified Mixed Use Planned Unit Development. Although the residential component of the PUD may not be developed by RCMA, it will be developed in a cooperative manner with the intent to have the residential integrated into the school and charter school portion of the PUD. The applicant wants to reduce the buffers due to the cooperative nature of the two uses. The applicant is also requesting an additional deviation. 9.A.1.a Packet Pg. 82 Attachment: Staff Report - RCMA Immokalee PUDZ (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) PUDZ-PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee MPUD Page 5 of 15 Revised: September 2, 2021 Based upon the above analysis, this proposed PUDZ may be deemed consistent with the Immokalee Area Master Plan (IAMP) and the FLUE. Transportation Element: In evaluating this project, staff reviewed the applicant’s April 6, 2021 (revised) Traffic Impact Statement for consistency with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the Growth Management Plan (GMP) using the 2020 Annual Update and Inventory Reports (AUIR). Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the GMP states; “The County Commission shall review all rezone petitions, SRA designation applications, conditional use petitions, and proposed amendments to the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) affecting the overall countywide density or intensity of permissible development, with consideration of their impact on the overall County transportation system, and shall not approve any petition or application that would directly access a deficient roadway segment as identified in the current AUIR or if it impacts an adjacent roadway segment that is deficient as identified in the current AUIR, or which significantly impacts a roadway segment or adjacent roadway segment that is currently operating and/or is projected to operate below an adopted Level of Service Standard within the five year AUIR planning period, unless specific mitigating stipulations are also approved. A petition or application has significant impacts if the traffic impact statement reveals that any of the following occur: a. For links (roadway segments) directly accessed by the project where project traffic is equal to or exceeds 2% of the adopted LOS standard service volume; b. For links adjacent to links directly accessed by the project where project traffic is equal to or exceeds 2% of the adopted LOS standard service volume; and c. For all other links the project traffic is considered to be significant up to the point where it is equal to or exceeds 3% of the adopted LOS standard service volume. Mitigating stipulations shall be based upon a mitigation plan prepared by the applicant and submitted as part of the traffic impact statement that addresses the project’s significant impacts on all roadways.” Staff finding: According to the TIS provided with this petition the proposed RCMA Immokalee Development will include 160 multi-family residential units, a 700 student K-8 Charter School, a 250 student Day Care and a 5,000 square foot retail center and it will generate a projected total of +/- 424 PM peak hour, 2-way trips on the adjacent roadway segments. The projected trips generated by this development will occur on the following adjacent roadway network links according to the current 2020 AUIR: Roadway/Link # Link 2020 AUIR LOS Current Peak Hour Peak Direction Volume/Peak Direction Projected P.M Peak Hour/Peak Direction Project Traffic (1) 2020 Remaining Capacity 9.A.1.a Packet Pg. 83 Attachment: Staff Report - RCMA Immokalee PUDZ (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) PUDZ-PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee MPUD Page 6 of 15 Revised: September 2, 2021 Carson Road/9.0 Lake Trafford to Immokalee Drive B 600/North 54/NB 305 Lake Trafford Road/47.0 Carson Road to S.R. 29 C 800/East 128/WB 247 S.R.29 /84.0 South of S.R. 29 to 9th Street B 1,700/West 32/EB 991 S.R. 29 /85.0 9th Street to North S.R. 29 D 900/South 54/SB 185 Westclox Road/116.0 Carson Road to S.R. 29 B 800/West 9/WB 580 1. Source for P.M. Peak Hour/Peak Direction Project Traffic is April 6, 2021; Traffic Impact Statement provided by the petitioner. Based on the TIS provided by the applicant, and the 2020 AUIR, the subject PUD can be found consistent with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the Growth Management Plan. Transportation Planning staff finds this petition consistent with the GMP. Transportation Planning Staff Condition of Approval: The following note shall be provided on the master plan: No vehicle stacking shall occur on Lake Trafford ROW. All vehicle stacking must occur within the PUD limits. Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME): Environmental review staff has found this project to be consistent with the Conservation & Coastal Management Element (CCME). The project site consists of 20.6 acres of native vegetation. A minimum of 5.15 acres (25%) of native vegetation is required to be preserved. GMP Conclusion: The GMP is the prevailing document to support land use decisions, such as this proposed rezoning. Staff is required to make a recommendation regarding a finding of consistency or inconsistency with the overall GMP as part of the recommendation for approval, approval with conditions, or denial of any rezoning petition. This petition is consistent with the GMP. STAFF ANALYSIS: Applications to rezone to or to amend MPUDs shall be in the form of a MPUD Master Plan of development, along with a list of permitted and accessory uses and a development standards table. The MPUD application shall also include a list of developer commitments and any proposed deviations from the LDC. Staff has completed a comprehensive evaluation of this land use petition, including the criteria upon which a recommendation must be based, specifically noted in LDC Section 10.02.13.B.5, Planning Commission Recommendation (commonly referred to as the “PUD Findings”), and Section 10.02.08.F, Nature of Requirements of Planning Commission 9.A.1.a Packet Pg. 84 Attachment: Staff Report - RCMA Immokalee PUDZ (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) PUDZ-PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee MPUD Page 7 of 15 Revised: September 2, 2021 Report (referred to as “Rezone Findings”), which establish the legal basis to support the CCPC’s recommendation. The CCPC uses the aforementioned criteria as the basis for its recommendation to the Board, who in turn use the criteria to support their action on the rezoning or amendment request. An evaluation relative to these subsections is discussed below, under the heading “Zoning Services Analysis.” In addition, staff offers the following analyses: Environmental Review: Environmental Planning staff has reviewed the petition to address environmental concerns. The required preserve is 5.15 acres (25% of 20.6 acres); the Master Concept Plan provides for a 5.15 acre preserve onsite. No listed animal species were observed on the property. However, the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC) wildlife data indicates the presence of Black Bear (Ursus americanus floridanus) in the area. A black bear management plan will need to be included at PPL or SDP review. Stiff-leafed wild-pine (Tillandsia fasciculata), listed as a less rare plant, have been observed on the property and will be protected in accordance with LDC 3.04.03. The property is in multiple Wellfield Risk Management Special Treatment Overlay zones (ST/W- 1 through ST/W-4) and must address ground water protection in accordance with LDC Section 3.06.12. The community facility and residential uses listed in the “RCMA Immokalee MPUD Permitted Uses Exhibit A” are allowed uses within the W-1 through W-4 zone. Some commercial uses (i.e., gas stations, car washes, dry cleaners, etc.) have the potential to impact groundwater and surface water. The proposed Commercial and a portion of the Community Facility areas are located within the “Wellhead Protection Area,” which is a 500-foot radial setback distance from public potable water wells (Chapter 62-521, Florida Administrative Code). Several potential uses are prohibited within the Wellhead Protection Area, including aboveground storage tanks (Chapter 62-762, F.A.C.), underground storage tanks (Chapter 62-716, F.A.C.), and all discharges of industrial wastewater to groundwater. Pollution Prevention Best Management Practices (BMPs) must be provided at time of PPL or SDP review for those land uses which have the potential to cause impacts to drinking water. Additionally, depending on the proposed use, the applicant may be required to comply with secondary containment of all regulated substances as well as obtaining a Certificate to Operate (CTO) in a Wellfield Program, per LDC 10.04.01, at time of site development. Transportation Review: Transportation Planning staff has reviewed the petition for compliance with the GMP and the LDC and recommends approval. Utilities Review: Public Utilities staff did not review this petition as the property is not within the Collier County Water-Sewer District. Landscape Review: Staff has reviewed the petition for compliance with the LDC and recommends approval of this project. There is 1 deviation pertaining to landscape (see deviation discussion below). The buffer types labeled on the Master Plan are consistent with the Land Dev elopment Code. Stormwater Review: Stormwater staff has reviewed the petition for compliance with the GMP and 9.A.1.a Packet Pg. 85 Attachment: Staff Report - RCMA Immokalee PUDZ (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) PUDZ-PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee MPUD Page 8 of 15 Revised: September 2, 2021 the LDC and recommends approval of this project. Affordable Housing Review: Staff has reviewed the petition and had determined that the Affordable Housing Density Bonus is not applicable to the project. (See Attachment B) School District: At this time, there is sufficient capacity within the elementary and middle concurrency service areas and in an adjacent high school concurrency service area of the proposed development. At the time of SDP or platting, the project will be evaluated for school concurrency. Immokalee Community Redevelopment Agency (CRA) – The subject property is located within the Immokalee Community Redevelopment Area and as such the CRA serves as the primary vehicle for community and professional input on petitions. The agent presented the project at the June 16, 2021, CRA Meeting. The CRA Advisory Board supported the project and encouraged continued discussions with Parks and Recreation about athletic fields and the assurance of traffic calming in and out of the school. The CRA Advisory Board passed it by vote of 7-0-1. (See Attachment C) Zoning Services Review: The applicant proposes to rezone 63± acres from the Agricultural Zoning District (ST/W-1 through W-4) to the RCMA Immokalee Mixed Use Planned Unit Development (MPUD) Zoning District to allow a 700 student K-8 School, a 250-student pre-school, 160 multi- family dwelling units, which may include market rate, essential service and/or affordable housing units, and 5,000 square feet of Intermediate Commercial (C-3) uses and associated accessory uses. Access to the educational campus and housing will be from Lake Trafford Road, with a separate access to Carson Road to serve the small commercially designated tract. A majority of the property was previously cleared for agricultural use; however, it is within the Immokalee Urban Area and has water and sewer services available to the property from the Immokalee Water/Sewer District. The mixed-use project as proposed is compatible with the surrounding neighborhood. Lake Trafford Road services a variety of commercial, residential, recreational, and educational uses. The RCMA education facilities proposed are already located in the Immokalee community and serve the local residents. The project provides buffers that will meet or exceed those required by the Land Development Code and are of a scale appropriate for the site and community. The MPUD provides for a significant amount of open space in the form of vegetative preserve, surface water management, and recreational open space associated the proposed educational facilities and residential development. The location of the open space areas provides for natural buffers to adjacent property as well as functional open space for the MPUD. The MPUD will exceed the code required 30% open space for a mixed-use project. The addition of 250-student childcare center, 700 student K-8 school, community center and a maximum of 160 multi-family residential dwelling units will not adversely affect living conditions in the area. Buffers will be provided per the LDC. PUD FINDINGS: LDC Section 10.02.13.B.5 states that, “In support of its recommendation, the CCPC shall make findings as to the PUD Master Plan’s compliance with the following criteria in addition to the findings in LDC Section 10.02.08”: 9.A.1.a Packet Pg. 86 Attachment: Staff Report - RCMA Immokalee PUDZ (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) PUDZ-PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee MPUD Page 9 of 15 Revised: September 2, 2021 1. The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer, water, and other utilities. The subject site fronts the north side of Lake Trafford Road near Carson Road. Water and wastewater facilities are located within the right-of-way, and each has enough capacity to serve the proposed RPUD. Stormwater management details will be evaluated at time of SFWMD Environmental Resource Permitting (ERP) and County Site Development Permit (SDP)/Plans and Plat Permit (PPL) permitting. 2. Adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of any proposed agreements, contracts, or other instruments, or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense. Documents submitted with the application, which were reviewed by the County Attorney’s Office, demonstrate unified control of the property. 3. Conformity of the proposed Planned Unit Development with the goals, objectives, and policies of the Growth Management Plan (GMP). County staff has reviewed this petition and has offered an analysis of conformity with the relevant goals, objectives, and policies of the GMP within the GMP Consistency portion of this staff report and found it consistent. 4. The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, whi ch conditions may include restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening requirements. As described in the Staff Analysis section of this staff report subsection Landscape Review, staff is of the opinion that the proposed project will be compatible with the surrounding area. The Master Plan proposes the appropriate perimeter landscape buffers. 5. The adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the development. The RPUD is required to provide at least 60% of the gross area for usable open space. No deviation from the open space requirement is being requested, and compliance would be demonstrated at the time of SDP or platting. 6. The timing or sequence of development for the purpose of ensuring the adequacy of available improvements and facilities, both public and private. As noted above, Transportation Planning staff finds this petition consistent with the GMP. Operational impacts will be addressed at time of first development order (SDP or Plat), at which time a new TIS will be required to demonstrate turning movements for all site access 9.A.1.a Packet Pg. 87 Attachment: Staff Report - RCMA Immokalee PUDZ (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) PUDZ-PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee MPUD Page 10 of 15 Revised: September 2, 2021 points. Finally, the project’s development must comply with all other applicable concurrency management regulations when development approvals, including but not limited to any plats and or site development plans, are sought. 7. The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion. The area has adequate supporting infrastructure, such as wastewater disposal systems and potable water supplies, to accommodate this project based upon the commitments made by the petitioner, and the fact that adequate public facilities requirements will continuously be addressed when development approvals are sought. 8. Conformity with PUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the particular case, based on determination that such modifications are justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations. Two deviations are proposed in connection with this request to rezone to MPUD. See deviations section of the staff report beginning on page 13. Rezone Findings: LDC Subsection 10.02.08.F states, “When pertaining to the rezoning of land, the report and recommendations to the planning commission to the Board of County Commissioners…shall show that the planning commission has studied and considered proposed change in relation to the following when applicable”: 1. Whether the proposed change will be consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the Future Land Use Map and the elements of the Growth Management Plan. Comprehensive Planning staff determined the subject petition is consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the FLUM and other elements of the GMP. 2. The existing land use pattern. The existing land use pattern (of the abutting properties) is described in the Surrounding Land Use and Zoning section of this staff report. The proposed use would not change the existing land use patterns of the surrounding properties. 3. The possible creation of an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts. The subject parcel is of sufficient size and therefore will not result in an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts. It is also comparable with expected land uses by virtue of its consistency with the FLUE of the GMP. 4. Whether existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the property proposed for change. As shown on the zoning map included at the beginning of this report, the existing district boundaries are logically drawn. The proposed PUD zoning boundaries follow the property 9.A.1.a Packet Pg. 88 Attachment: Staff Report - RCMA Immokalee PUDZ (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) PUDZ-PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee MPUD Page 11 of 15 Revised: September 2, 2021 ownership boundaries and coincide with the GMP subdistrict boundaries. The zoning map on page 2 of the staff report illustrates the perimeter of the outer boundary of the subject parcel. 5. Whether changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed rezoning necessary. The proposed rezone is not necessary, but it is being requested in compliance with the LDC provisions to seek such changes. It should be noted that the proposed uses are not allowed under the current zoning classification. 6. Whether the proposed change will adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood. Staff is of the opinion that the proposed PUD Rezone is consistent with the County’s land use policies that are reflected by the FLUE of the GMP. Development in compliance with the proposed PUD rezone should not adversely impact living conditions in the area. 7. Whether the proposed change will create or excessively increase traffic congestion or create types of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses, because of peak volumes or projected types of vehicular traffic, including activity during construction phases of the development, or otherwise affect public safety. As noted above, Transportation Planning staff finds this petition consistent with the GMP. Operational impacts will be addressed at time of first development order (SDP or Plat). Additionally, the project’s development must comply with all other applicable concurrency management regulations when development approvals are sought. 8. Whether the proposed change will create a drainage problem. The proposed MPUD request is not anticipated to create stormwater management problems in the area; provided an environmental resource permit that addresses stormwater best management practices, stormwater pollution prevention, urban stormwater management, on-site stormwater treatment, and attenuation storage is obtained from the South Florida Water Management District. County staff will evaluate the project’s stormwater management system, calculations, and design criteria at time of SDP and/or plat review. 9. Whether the proposed change will seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas. The current zoning designation of Rural Agricultural (A) zoning district includes a maximum allowable height for principal uses of 35 feet. The proposed MPUD includes a maximum allowable height of residential buildings of 45 feet zoned and 55 feet actual. The proposed MPUD also eliminates the potential for numerous manufacturing and commercial uses that could impact light and air to adjacent areas. 10. Whether the proposed change will adversely affect property values in the adjacent areas. 9.A.1.a Packet Pg. 89 Attachment: Staff Report - RCMA Immokalee PUDZ (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) PUDZ-PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee MPUD Page 12 of 15 Revised: September 2, 2021 This is a subjective determination based upon anticipated results, which may be internal or external to the subject property. Property valuation is affected by a host of factors including zoning; however, zoning by itself may or may not affect values, since value determination is driven by market value. 11. Whether the proposed change will be a deterrent to the improvement or development of adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations. Properties to the north, east, west, and south are developed, as previously noted. The basic premise underlying all the development standards in the LDC is that sound application, when combined with the site development plan approval process and/or subdivision process, gives reasonable assurance that a change in zoning will not result in deterrence to improvement or development of adjacent property. Therefore, the proposed zoning change should not be a deterrent to the improvement of adjacent properties. 12. Whether the proposed change will constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual owner as contrasting with the public welfare. Because the proposed development complies with the GMP through the proposed amendment, then that constitutes a public policy statement supporting zoning actions when they are consistent with said Comprehensive Plan. In light of this fact, the proposed change does not constitute a grant of special privilege. Consistency with the FLUE is further determined to be a public welfare relationship because actions consistent with plans are in the public interest. 13. Whether there are substantial reasons why the property cannot be used in accordance with existing zoning. The proposed uses and development standards are not permitted, according to the existing classification. 14. Whether the change suggested is out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the County. It is staff’s opinion the proposed uses and associated development standards and developer commitments will ensure that the project is not out of scale with the needs of the community. 15. Whether is it impossible to find other adequate sites in the County for the proposed use in districts already permitting such use. The petition was reviewed for compliance with the GMP and the LDC, and staff does not specifically review other sites in conjunction with a specific petition. 16. The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site alteration, which 9.A.1.a Packet Pg. 90 Attachment: Staff Report - RCMA Immokalee PUDZ (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) PUDZ-PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee MPUD Page 13 of 15 Revised: September 2, 2021 would be required to make the property usable for any of the range of potential uses under the proposed zoning classification. Any development anticipated by the PUD Document would require considerable site alteration, and this project will undergo extensive evaluation relative to all federal, state, and local development regulations during the SDP and/or platting processes, and again later as part of the building permit process. 17. The impact of development on the availability of adequate public facilities and services consistent with the levels of service adopted in the Collier County Growth Management Plan and as defined and implemented through the Collier County Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance, as amended. The project will have to meet all applicable criteria set forth in LDC Section 6.02.00 regarding Adequate Public Facilities (APF), and the project will need to be consistent with all applicable goals and objectives of the GMP regarding adequate public facilities, except as may be exempt by federal regulations. This petition has been reviewed by County staff responsible for jurisdictional elements of the GMP as part of the amendment process and those staff persons have concluded that no Level of Service will be adversely impacted with the commitments contained in the PUD Document. The concurrency review for APF is determined at the time of SDP review. The activity proposed by this rezoning will have no impact on public facility adequacy regarding utilities. 18. Such other factors, standards, or criteria that the Board of County Commissioners shall deem important in the protection of the public health, safety, and welfare. To be determined by the Board during its advertised public hearing. DEVIATION DISCUSSION: The petitioner is seeking two deviations from the requirements of the LDC. The deviations are directly extracted from PUD Exhibit E. The petitioner’s rationale and staff analysis/recommendation are outlined below. Proposed Deviation #1: (Six-foot chain-link fence) “Deviation #1 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.03.02.G.1.a., “Supplemental Standards”, which requires chain link (including wire mesh), and wood fences are prohibited forward of the primary façade and shall be a minimum of 100 feet from a public right -of-way. If these types of fences face a public or private street, then they shall be screened with an irrigated hedge planted directly in f ront of the fence on the street side. Plant material shall be a minimum of 3 gallons in size and planted no more than 3 feet on center at time of installation. This plant material must be maintained at no less than three-quarters of the height of the adjacent fence, to instead allow the use of up to a 6-foot-high chain link fence forward of the primary façade where the chain link fence is screened with an irrigated hedge planting at a minimum of 3 gallons in size and planted no more than 3 feet on center at time of installation directly in front of the fence facing the external right-of-way.” 9.A.1.a Packet Pg. 91 Attachment: Staff Report - RCMA Immokalee PUDZ (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) PUDZ-PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee MPUD Page 14 of 15 Revised: September 2, 2021 Petitioner’s Justification: The proposed chain link fencing is proposed to be used to provide needed security for the school campus component of the MPUD. The deviation is consistent with other fences that have been constructed in Collier County for security. Staff Analysis and Recommendation: Staff sees no detrimental effect if this deviation request is approved. Zoning and Development Review staff recommends APPROVAL of this deviation, finding that in compliance with LDC Section 10.02.13.A.3, the petitioner has demonstrated that “the element may be waived without a detrimental effect on the health, safety and welfare of the community,” and LDC Section 10.02.13.B.5.h, the petitioner has demonstrated that the deviation is “justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations.” Proposed Deviation #2: (15-foot-wide Type B buffer) Deviation #2 seeks relief from LDC Section 4.06.02, “Table 2.4 Table of Buffer Requirements by Land Use Classifications”, which provides that where multiple family dwellings are adjacent to a community facility (CF) use a 15-foot-wide Type B Buffer is required for both uses, to instead allow for a single 15-foot-wide Type B Buffer to be installed on the residential tract and will be installed at the time of construction of the residential component of the mixed-use PUD. Petitioner’s Justification: The project is a unified Mixed Use Planned Unit Development. Although the residential component of the PUD may not be developed by RCMA, it will be developed in a cooperative manner with the intent to have the residential integrated into the school and charter school portion of the PUD. Two 15-foot-wide Type B Buffers is excessive given the cooperative nature of the two uses. Until the residential component is developed no buffer is necessary on the CF Tract due to the significant distance from the adjacent property to the west which is Lake Trafford Elementary School and its preserve area. Staff Analysis and Recommendation: Given the intent to integrate the residential into the school portion of the PUD, staff sees no detrimental effect if this deviation request is approved. Zoning and Development Review staff recommends APPROVAL of this deviation, finding that in compliance with LDC Section 10.02.13.A.3, the petitioner has demonstrated that “the element may be waived without a detrimental effect on the health, safety and welfare of the community,” and LDC Section 10.02.13.B.5.h, the petitioner has demonstrated that the deviation is “justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations.” NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING (NIM): The applicant conducted a NIM on March 30, 2021 at the Immokalee Charter Scool located at 123 N. 4th Street in Immokalee. The meeting commenced at approximately 6:00 p.m. and ended at 6:20 p.m. The applicant’s agent explained the request for the proposed PUD Rezone. Wayne Arnold, the agent, conducted a PowerPoint presentation and gave a detailed explanation of the project. The meeting was then opened to attendees for questions. The concerns from the public were if the housing was proposed as market rate or affordable, traffic, the proposed State Road 29 bypass to alleviate traffic on local roads, and the undeveloped open space land immediately to the 9.A.1.a Packet Pg. 92 Attachment: Staff Report - RCMA Immokalee PUDZ (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) PUDZ-PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee MPUD Page 15 of 15 Revised: September 2, 2021 west of the commercial parcel. Wayne Arnold and Jim Banks answered all these public concerns. No commitments were discussed at this NIM meeting. A copy of the NIM materials are included in Attachment D. ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL (EAC) REVIEW: This project does not require Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) review, as this project did not meet the EAC scope of land development project reviews as identified in Section 2 -1193 of the Collier County Codes of Laws and Ordinances. COUNTY ATTORNEY OFFICE REVIEW: The County Attorney’s Office reviewed this staff report on September 2, 2021. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the CCPC approve Petition PUDA-PL20200001827 subject to the following conditions of approval: 1. The following note shall be provided on the master plan: No vehicle stacking shall occur on Lake Trafford ROW. All vehicle stacking must occur within the PUD limits. 2. Remove commercial (C-1 through C-3) uses that have the potential to impact the public water supply (i.e., laundromats, dry cleaners, gasoline service stations, convenience stores with fuel pumps, pain stores, automotive services, photofinishing laboratories, automotive vehicle dealers and any use that allow retail fuel sales) from the list of allowable uses within the 500-foot radial setback from the public potable well (Wellfield Protection Area). Attachments: A) Proposed Ordinance B) Affordable Housing Density Bonus Determination C) Immokalee CRA, June 16, 2021, Meeting Approval Recommendation and Vote D) Application/Backup Materials E) Hybrid Meeting Waiver 9.A.1.a Packet Pg. 93 Attachment: Staff Report - RCMA Immokalee PUDZ (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) 9.A.1.b Packet Pg. 94 Attachment: Attachment A - Proposed Ordinance (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) 9.A.1.b Packet Pg. 95 Attachment: Attachment A - Proposed Ordinance (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) RCMA Immokalee MPUD (PL20200001827) August 3, 2021 Page 1 of 11 EXHIBIT A RCMA IMMOKALEE MPUD PERMITTED USES A maximum of 700 student K-8 School, a 250-student pre-school, 160 multi-family dwelling units, 7,500 square foot community center and 5,000 square feet of Intermediate Commercial (C-3) uses shall be permitted within the MPUD. The uses are subject to the trip cap identified in Exhibit F, Section 3.a of this PUD. No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or in part, for other than the following: COMMUNITY FACILITY: A. Principal Uses: 1. Childcare centers (8351), up to 250 students 2. Community centers (8322), not to exceed 7,500 square feet 3. Parks and playgrounds, indoor/outdoor recreation facilities, gymnasium, and open space uses 4. Schools, private and parochial schools (8211), up to 700 students 5. Any other principal use, which is comparable in nature with the foregoing list of permitted principal uses, as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals (“BZA”) or the Hearing Examiner. B. Accessory Uses: 1. Administrative Offices 2. Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with the principal uses permitted in this MPUD 3. Cafeterias in conjunction with pre-school or private school use 4. Essential public services as permitted in LDC 2.01.03 A. 5. Plazas, event lawn, community gardens, nature trails and similar outdoor areas in conjunction with school or preschool 6. Water management 9.A.1.b Packet Pg. 96 Attachment: Attachment A - Proposed Ordinance (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) RCMA Immokalee MPUD (PL20200001827) August 3, 2021 Page 2 of 11 7. Any other accessory use, which is comparable in nature with the foregoing list of permitted principal uses, as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals (“BZA”) or the Hearing Examiner. RESIDENTIAL: A. Principal Uses: 1. Dwelling Units: Multi-Family, up to 160 units 2. Model homes / model sales or leasing offices 3. Any other principal use, which is comparable in nature with the foregoing list of permitted principal uses, as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals (“BZA”) or the Hearing Examiner. B. Accessory Uses: 1. Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with the principal uses permitted in this MPUD, including but not limited to garages, carports, swimming pools, spas and screen enclosures. 2. Clubhouses, community administrative facilities and indoor and outdoor recreational facilities intended to serve residents and guests, including leasing and construction offices. These are permitted in the Amenity Area. 3. Water management facilities to serve the project such as lakes. 4. Open space uses and structures such as, but not limited to, boardwalks, nature trails, gazebos and picnic areas. 5. Any other accessory and related use that is determined to be comparable in nature with the foregoing uses and consistent with the permitted accessory uses of this MPUD as determined by the BZA or the Hearing Examiner. COMMERCIAL: A. Principal Uses: up to 5,000 square feet 1. All permitted and conditional uses in the C-1 through C-3 Zoning Districts of the Collier County Land Development Code (LDC), Ordinance 04-41, as amended. 9.A.1.b Packet Pg. 97 Attachment: Attachment A - Proposed Ordinance (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) RCMA Immokalee MPUD (PL20200001827) August 3, 2021 Page 3 of 11 2. Any other principal use, which is comparable in nature with the foregoing list of permitted principal uses, as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals (“BZA”) or the Hearing Examiner. B. Accessory Uses: 1. Uses and structures that are accessory and incidental to the permitted uses within this MPUD document. 2. Water management facilities to serve the project such as lakes. 3. Open space uses and structures such as, but not limited to, boardwalks, nature trails, gazebos and picnic areas. 4. Any other accessory and related use that is determined to be comparable in nature with the foregoing uses and consistent with the permitted accessory uses of this MPUD as determined by the BZA or the Hearing Examiner. PRESERVE: A. Allowable Uses: 1. Nature trails and boardwalks that do not reduce the amount of required preserve area to be retained. 2. Mitigation for environmental permitting, as per LDC requirements. 3. Passive Recreation areas, as per LDC requirements. 4. Water management and water management structures, as per LDC requirements. 9.A.1.b Packet Pg. 98 Attachment: Attachment A - Proposed Ordinance (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) RCMA Immokalee MPUD (PL20200001827) August 3, 2021 Page 4 of 11 EXHIBIT B RCMA IMMOKALEE MPUD DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS The table below sets forth the development standards for land uses within the RCMA Immokalee MPUD. Standards not specifically set forth herein shall be those specified in applicable sections of the LDC in effect as of the date of approval of the SDP or subdivision plat. PRINCIPAL STRUCTURES *4 MULTI- FAMILY AMENITY AREA *2 COMMERCIAL COMMUNITY FACILITY Minimum Floor Area per unit 700 SF N/A N/A N/A Minimum Lot Area N/A N/A N/A N/A Minimum Lot Width N/A N/A 60 feet N/A Minimum Lot Depth N/A N/A N/A N/A Minimum Setbacks (External) Lake Trafford ROW N/A 250 feet N/A 100 feet Eastern PUD Boundary N/A N/A 25 feet 100 feet Western PUD Boundary 50 feet 15 feet N/A N/A Northern PUD Boundary 50 feet 50 feet 5 feet 200 feet Southern PUD Boundary N/A N/A 0 / 5 feet *1 N/A Minimum Setbacks (Internal) Private Internal Drives/ROW 10 feet 5 feet N/A 5 feet Lakes (measured from control elevation) 20 feet 20 feet 20 feet 20 feet Preserve 25 feet 25 feet 25 feet 25 feet Minimum Distance Between Buildings 20 feet N/A N/A 20 feet Maximum Building Height Zoned Actual 45 feet 55 feet 25 feet 35 feet 35 feet 45 feet 35 feet 45 feet ACCESSORY STRUCTURES *3, *4 MULTI- FAMILY AMENITY AREA *2 COMMERCIAL COMMUNITY FACILITY Minimum Setbacks (External) Lake Trafford ROW 250 feet 250 feet N/A 50 feet Eastern PUD Boundary N/A N/A 15 feet 50 feet Western PUD Boundary 10 feet 15 feet N/A N/A Northern PUD Boundary 25 feet 25 feet 5 feet 50 feet Southern PUD Boundary N/A N/A 0 / 5 feet *1 N/A Minimum Setbacks (Internal) Private Internal Drives/ROW 0 feet 0 feet N/A 0 feet Side Yard N/A N/A N/A N/A Rear Yard N/A N/A N/A N/A Lakes (measured from control elevation) 0 feet 0 feet 0 feet 0 feet Preserve 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet 9.A.1.b Packet Pg. 99 Attachment: Attachment A - Proposed Ordinance (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) RCMA Immokalee MPUD (PL20200001827) August 3, 2021 Page 5 of 11 Minimum Setbacks (External) 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet 10 feet Minimum Distance Between Buildings *5 0/10 feet N/A N/A N/A Maximum Building Height Zoned Actual 25 feet 30 feet 25 feet 30 feet 30 feet 35 feet 30 feet 35 feet SPS – Same as Principal Structure BH – Building Height (zoned height) *1 – 0 feet if commercial tract developed as SDP for adjacent C-3 commercial to the south. *2 – When not located in a residential building within the “R” tract. *3 – Does not apply to passive recreational uses such as trails/pathways. *4 - Community structures such as guardhouses, gatehouses, fences, walls, columns, decorative architectural features, streetscape, passive parks and access control structures shall have no required setback and are permitted throughout the “R” designated areas of the PUD; however such structures shall be located such that they do not cause vehicular stacking into the road right-of-way or create site distance issues for motorists and pedestrians. *5 – Zero feet if attached, 10 feet if detached. Note: nothing in this MPUD Document shall be deemed to approve a deviation from the LDC unless it is expressly stated in a list of deviations. 9.A.1.b Packet Pg. 100 Attachment: Attachment A - Proposed Ordinance (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) R C ZONED: MH USE: RESIDENTIAL ZONED: P USE: UTILITY SITE AND CHURCH ZONED: A USE: EMS/FIRE STATION #31 ZONED: C-3 USE: CONVENIENCE STORE ZONED: ARROWHEAD MPUD USE: UNDEVELOPED COMMERCIAL TRACT ZONED: VR USE: UNDEVELOPED ZONED: AUSE: LAKE TRAFFORD ELEMENTARY SCHOOLZONED: LIBERTY LANDING RPUDUSE: RESIDENTIALZONED: ARROWHEAD MPUD USE: PARTIALLY DEVELOPED RESIDENTIAL ZONED: VR USE: UNDEVELOPED ZONED: VR USE: RESIDENTIAL 20' WIDE TYPE 'D' LANDSCAPE BUFFER 20' WIDE TYPE 'D' LANDSCAPE BUFFER MINIMUM 6-FOOT WIDE LANDSCAPE BUFFER RESERVATION (SEE NOTE #2) 20' WIDE TYPE 'D' LANDSCAPE BUFFER 15' WIDE TYPE 'B' LANDSCAPE BUFFER15' WIDE TYPE 'B' LANDSCAPE BUFFER15' WIDE TYPE 'B' LANDSCAPE BUFFER 15' WIDE TYPE 'B' LANDSCAPE BUFFER 1 20' WIDE TYPE 'D' LANDSCAPE BUFFER 10' WIDE TYPE 'A' LANDSCAPE BUFFER 15' WIDE TYPE 'B' LANDSCAPE BUFFER PRESERVE CHILD CARE WATER MANAGEMENT WATER MANAGEMENT PAVED PARKING AND DRIVE AISLES GRASS PARKING PEDESTRIAN / VEHICULAR INTERCONNECT WATER MANAGEMENT / OPEN SPACE / RECREATION AREA WATER MANAGEMENT / OPEN SPACE / RECREATION AREA WATER MANAGEMENT / OPEN SPACE / RECREATION AREA CF CHARTER SCHOOL 1CF 1CF 1CF EVENT LAWN EVENT LAWN OUTFALL LOCATION (APPROXIMATE) 2 2 AA 2 2 15' WIDE TYPE 'B' LANDSCAPE BUFFER 2 GradyMinor Civil Engineers ●Land Surveyors ●Planners ●Landscape Architects Cert. of Auth. EB 0005151 Cert. of Auth. LB 0005151 Business LC 26000266 Q. Grady Minor and Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey Bonita Springs, Florida 34134 Bonita Springs: 239.947.1144 ZZZ.GradyMinor.coP Fort Myers: 239.690.4380 0 300'150' # DEVIATION AA AMENITY AREA R RESIDENTIAL C COMMERCIAL CF COMMUNITY FACILITY 9.A.1.b Packet Pg. 101 Attachment: Attachment A - Proposed Ordinance (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) GradyMinor Civil Engineers ●Land Surveyors ●Planners ●Landscape Architects Cert. of Auth. EB 0005151 Cert. of Auth. LB 0005151 Business LC 26000266 Q. Grady Minor and Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey Bonita Springs, Florida 34134 Bonita Springs: 239.947.1144 ZZZ.GradyMinor.coP Fort Myers: 239.690.4380 NOTES 1. THIS PLAN IS CONCEPTUAL IN NATURE AND IS SUBJECT TO MINOR MODIFICATION DUE TO AGENCY PERMITTING REQUIREMENTS.2.PRESERVES MAY BE USED TO SATISFY THE LANDSCAPE BUFFER REQUIREMENTS AFTER EXOTICVEGETATION REMOVAL IN ACCORDANCE WITH LDC SECTIONS 4.06.02 AND 4.06.05.E.1. SUPPLEMENTAL PLANTINGS WITH NATIVE PLANT MATERIALS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITHLDC SECTION 3.05.07. IN ORDER TO MEET THE LDC REQUIREMENTS FOR A TYPE 'B' BUFFER A 6FOOT WIDE LANDSCAPE BUFFER RESERVATION HAS BEEN IDENTIFIED ON THE MASTER PLAN. IN THE EVENT THAT THE PRESERVE DOES NOT MEET BUFFER REQUIREMENTS AFTER REMOVAL OFEXOTICS AND SUPPLEMENTAL PLANTING WITHIN THE PRESERVE, PLANTINGS WILL BEPROVIDED IN THE 6' WIDE RESERVATION TO MEET THE BUFFER REQUIREMENTS. THE TYPE, SIZE, AND NUMBER OF SUCH PLANTINGS, IF NECESSARY, WILL BE DETERMINED AT TIME OFINITIAL SDP OR PLAT AND INCLUDED ON THE LANDSCAPE PLANS FOR THE SDP OR PLAT.3. WATER AND SEWER TO BE PROVIDED BY IMMOKALEE WATER AND SEWER DISTRICT. DEVIATIONS (SEE EXHIBIT E) 1. LDC SECTION 5.03.02.G.1.A., "SUPPLEMENTAL STANDARDS" 2. LDC SECTION 4.06.02, “TABLE 2.4 TABLE OF BUFFER REQUIREMENTS BY LAND USE CLASSIFICATIONS” SITE SUMMARY TOTAL SITE AREA: 62.22± ACRE COMMERCIAL (C)0.44± AC (1%) RESIDENTIAL (R)9.45± AC (15%) COMMUNITY FACILITY (CF)47.18± AC (76%) PRESERVE 5.15± AC (8%) RESIDENTIAL: MAXIMUM 160 DWELLING UNITS COMMERCIAL: MAXIMUM 5,000 S.F. OPEN SPACE: REQUIRED: 30% PROVIDED: 30% PRESERVE: REQUIRED: 5.15 ACRES (20.6± ACRES NATIVE VEGETATION X 0.25) PROVIDED: 5.15 ACRES 9.A.1.b Packet Pg. 102 Attachment: Attachment A - Proposed Ordinance (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) RCMA Immokalee MPUD (PL20200001827) August 3, 2021 Page 8 of 11 EXHIBIT D RCMA IMMOKALEE MPUD LEGAL DESCRIPTION THAT PART OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 31, TOWNSHIP 46 SOUTH, RANGE 29 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA, LYING NORTH OF C.R. 890; LESS THE NORTH, EAST, AND WEST 30 FEET THEREOF, LESS LANDS DESCRIBED IN O.R. BOOK 551, PAGE 577; LESS LANDS DESCRIBED IN O.R. BOOK 739, PAGE 675; LESS LANDS DESCRIBED IN O.R. BOOK 770, PAGE 196; LESS LANDS DESCRIBED IN O.R. BOOK 957, PAGE 1736, LESS LANDS DESCRIBED IN O.R. BOOK 2280, PAGE 757; LESS ALL OF CARSON ROAD MOBILE HOME SUBDIVISION, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 31, PAGE 1, LESS CARSON ROAD; AND LESS LAKE TRAFFORD ROAD, ALL RECORDINGS OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. LESS AND EXCEPT: PARCEL 1: A TRACT OR PARCEL OF LAND SITUATED IN THE STATE OF FLORIDA, COLLIER COUNTY, LYING IN SECTION 31, TOWNSHIP 46 SOUTH, RANGE 29 EAST, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTHEAST ONE QUARTER OF SECTION 31; THENCE N00°55'53"W ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 540.33 FEET; THENCE N89°11'40"W FOR 30.02 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, SAID POINT BEING THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF A PARCEL OF LAND DESCRIBED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 739, PAGE 675; THENCE N89°11'40"W ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID PARCEL FOR 200.08' TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID PARCEL; THENCE N00°55'53"W FOR 60.28 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF A PARCEL OF LAND DESCRIBED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 551, PAGE 577; THENCE S89°06'51"E ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL FOR 199.79 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SAID CARSON ROAD; THENCE S00°55'53"E ALONG SAID WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE FOR 60.00' TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. TOTAL CONTAINING 62.22 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. 9.A.1.b Packet Pg. 103 Attachment: Attachment A - Proposed Ordinance (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) RCMA Immokalee MPUD (PL20200001827) August 3, 2021 Page 9 of 11 EXHIBIT E RCMA IMMOKALEE MPUD DEVIATIONS FROM THE LDC DEVIATION 1: Relief from LDC Subsection 5.03.02.G.1.a., Supplemental Standards, which provides chain link (including wire mesh) and wood fences are prohibited forward of the primary façade and shall be a minimum of 100 feet from a public right-of- way. If these types of fences face a public or private street, then they shall be screened with an irrigated hedge planted directly in front of the fence on the street side. Plant material shall be a minimum of 3 gallons in size and planted no more than 3 feet on center at time of installation. This plant material must be maintained at no less than three-quarters of the height of the adjacent fence, to instead allow the use of up to a 6-foot-high chain link fence forward of the primary façade where the chain link fence is screened with an irrigated hedge planting directly in front of the fence facing the external right-of-way. DEVIATION 2: Relief from LDC Section 4.06.02, “Table 2.4 Table of Buffer Requirements by Land Use Classifications”, which provides that where multiple family dwellings are adjacent to a community facility (CF) use a 15-foot-wide Type B Buffer is required for both uses, to instead allow for a single 15-foot-wide Type B Buffer to be installed on the residential tract and will be installed at the time of construction of the residential component of the mixed-use PUD. 9.A.1.b Packet Pg. 104 Attachment: Attachment A - Proposed Ordinance (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) RCMA Immokalee MPUD (PL20200001827) August 3, 2021 Page 10 of 11 EXHIBIT F RCMA IMMOKALEE MPUD DEVELOPMENT COMMITMENTS 1. PUD MONITORING One entity (hereinafter the Managing Entity) shall be responsible for PUD monitoring until close-out of the PUD, and this entity shall also be responsible for satisfying all PUD commitments until close-out of the PUD. At the time of this PUD approval, the Managing Entity is Redlands Christian Migrant Association, Inc., 402 W. Main Street, Immokalee, FL 34112. Should the Managing Entity desire to transfer the monitoring and commitments to a successor entity, then it must provide a copy of a legally binding document that needs to be approved for legal sufficiency by the County Attorney. After such approval, the Managing Entity will be released of its obligations upon written approval of the transfer by County staff, and the successor entity shall become the Managing Entity. As Owner and Developer sell off tracts, the Managing Entity shall provide written notice to County that includes an acknowledgement of the commitments required by the PUD by the new owner and the new owner’s agreement to comply with the Commitments through the Managing Entity, but the Managing Entity shall not be relieved of its responsibility under this Section. When the PUD is closed-out, then the Managing Entity is no longer responsible for the monitoring and fulfillment of PUD commitments. 2. MISCELLANEOUS a. Issuance of a development permit by a county does not in any way create any rights on the part of the applicant to obtain a permit from a state or federal agency and does not create any liability on the part of the county for issuance of the permit if the applicant fails to obtain requisite approvals or fulfill the obligations imposed by a state or federal agency or undertakes actions that result in a violation of state or federal law. B. All other applicable state or federal permits must be obtained before commencement of the development. 3. TRANSPORTATION a. The maximum total daily trip generation for the PUD shall not exceed 424 two-way PM peak hour net trips based on the use codes in the ITE Manual on trip generation rates in effect at the time of application for SDP/SDPA or subdivision plat approval. 9.A.1.b Packet Pg. 105 Attachment: Attachment A - Proposed Ordinance (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) RCMA Immokalee MPUD (PL20200001827) August 3, 2021 Page 11 of 11 4. LANDSCAPING a. Preserves may be used to satisfy the landscape buffer requirements after exotic vegetation removal in accordance with LDC sections 4.06.02 and 4.06.05.E.1. Supplemental plantings with native plant materials shall be in accordance with LDC section 3.05.07. In order to meet the LDC requirements for a Type B buffer, a 6-foot wide landscape buffer reservation has been identified on the Master Plan. In the event that the preserve does not meet buffer requirements after removal of exotics and supplemental planting within the preserve, plantings will be provided in the 6- foot wide reservation to meet the buffer requirements. The type, size, and number of such plantings, if necessary, will be determined at time of initial SDP or plat and included on the landscape plans for the SDP or plat. 5. ENVIRONMENTAL a. The MPUD shall be required to preserve 25% of native vegetation. 20.6± acres of native vegetation exist on-site requiring a minimum preservation of 5.15± acres (20.6 X .25 = 5.15). A minimum of 5.15± acres of native vegetation will be retained on-site. b. A management plan for Florida Black Bear and Fox Squirrel shall be submitted for review and approval at time of final plat or SDP for the project, whichever is applicable. 9.A.1.b Packet Pg. 106 Attachment: Attachment A - Proposed Ordinance (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) From: LaRowJacob Sent: Wednesday, May 12, 2021 1:39 PM To: FinnTimothy Cc: HalfordHilary Subject: RE: RCMA Immokalee PUDZ PL20200001827 Good Afternoon Mr. Finn: After reviewing the facts of the petition and internal discussion we’ve determined that the Affordable Housing Density Bonus is not applicable to this project. Thanks! Sincerely, Jacob LaRow Manager – Housing, Grant Development and Operations Community and Human Services 3339 Tamiami Trail E Suite 211 Naples, Fl 34112 239-252-2399 Jacob.LaRow@colliercountyfl.gov Making Our Community Stronger: One life, one home, one project at a time. From: FinnTimothy Sent: Monday, May 10, 2021 9:56 AM To: LaRowJacob Cc: HalfordHilary Subject: RE: RCMA Immokalee PUDZ PL20200001827 Hi Jacob, Just a friendly reminder to please have any comments back on the above petition by this Wednesday. Thank you From: FinnTimothy Sent: Friday, April 23, 2021 11:53 AM To: LaRowJacob <Jacob.LaRow@colliercountyfl.gov> Cc: HalfordHilary <Hilary.Halford@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: RE: RCMA Immokalee PUDZ PL20200001827 Hi Jacob, 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 107 Attachment: Attachment B - Affordable Housing Density Bonus Determination (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) Per our conversation, please review the attached documents from the Immokalee Fair Housing Alliance (PUDZ) approved last September. From: LaRowJacob <Jacob.LaRow@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Friday, April 23, 2021 11:11 AM To: FinnTimothy <Timothy.Finn@colliercountyfl.gov> Cc: HalfordHilary <Hilary.Halford@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: RCMA Immokalee PUDZ PL20200001827 Hello Timothy- I just left you long voicemail (apologies) regarding the Subject referenced above. If you have a minute or two today I’d live to be able to discuss the question regarding the Affordable Housing Density Bonus Agreement question that was raised. Sincerely, Jacob LaRow Manager – Housing, Grant Development and Operations Community and Human Services 3339 Tamiami Trail E Suite 211 Naples, Fl 34112 239-252-2399 Jacob.LaRow@colliercountyfl.gov Making Our Community Stronger: One life, one home, one project at a time. Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. 9.A.1.c Packet Pg. 108 Attachment: Attachment B - Affordable Housing Density Bonus Determination (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) FinnTimothy From: Sent: To: €c: Subject: Attachments: H Tim, they presented at the June 16 CRA Meeting. The meeting minutes are still in DRAFT form. They won't be presented to the CRA Advisory Board for consideration until September for consideration and approval. (see attached) Below is the motion that was approved per the draft. Let me know if you have any further questions. Thanks so much Action: ML Francisco "Fronk" Leon made d motion to support the project ond encourdge the continued discussions with Parks dnd Recredtion dbout dthletic lields dnd recommend thdt the ossurance o! troffic coming in dnd out of the school dre oddressed, ML Mork Lemke seconded the motion, ML Michoel "Mike" Fdcundo abstdined and it passed by vote, 7-0-7. Best Regards, Debrah Phone fBayshore Office - 239-252-8846 | Cell:239-285-8270 Phone lmmokalee Office - 239-867-0025 From: FinnTimothy <Timothy.Finn@colllercountyfl.gov> Sent: Monday, August 2, 2021 3:54 PM To: ForesterDebrah <Debrah.Forester@colliercountyfl.gov> Cc: Betancourtchristie <Christie.Betancourt@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: FW: RCMA lmmokalee (PUDZ) P120200001827 Hi Debrah, From: ForesterDebrah <Debrah.Forester@colliercountvfl.sov> Sent: Wednesday , Febtuary 24,2021 L2:L4 PM To: FinnTimothy <Timothv. Fin n@ colliercou ntvfl.gov>; Betancourtchristie <Chri ti tancourt colliercount ov>B Cc: SummersEllen <Ellen.Summers@ colliercountvfl.sov> Subiect: RE: RCMA lmmokalee (PUDz) P120200001827 ForesterDebrah Wednesday, August 4,2021 12:13 PM FinnTimothy Betancourtchristie RE: RCMA lmmokalee (PUDZ) P120200001827 DRAFT June 16 2021 CRA Minutes.docx Please see below correspondence from February. I don't think the agent, Wayne Arnold scheduled a presentation with the CRA? l'm writing the staff report for the above project and would like to know if the CRA would support this project? Please see attached ordlnance and other attachments. Hi Tim, yes the site is in the lmmokalee CRA boundaries. They are not required to provide a formal presentation. But we certainly encourage them to do so. I have copied Christie Betancourt on this email. She can provide meeting dates if the applicant is interested. Ellen can be dropped from this conversation. Thanks so much. Debrah 1 9.A.1.d Packet Pg. 109 Attachment: Attachment C - Immokalee CRA, June 16, 2021 Meeting Approval Recommendation and Vote (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Best Regards, Debrah Phone I Bayshore Oflice - 239-252-8846 | Cell:239-285-8270 Phone lmmokalee Office - 239-867-0025 From: FinnTimothy Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2021 10:10 AM To: SummersEllen Cc: ForesterDebrah Subject: RCMA lmmokalee (PUDZ) p120200001827 Hi Ellen, Can you verify that the above referenced petition is within the lmmokalee Community Redevelopment Agency (CRA)? Does the applicant need to provide a formal presentation to the lmmokalee CRA Advisory Board Joint Meeting? Timothy Finn, AICP Principol Plonner Zoning Division NOIE: New Emoi/Address os of 12109/20t7: Timothv Finn@colliercou tvfl.oov 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Noples Florido 34104 Pl:.,one:239.252.4312 Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. lf you do not want your e-mail address released an response to a public records requesl, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this offlce by telephone or in writing. 2 fell us how we ote doing by toking our Zoning Oivision Survey ot http://bit.lvlcollierzoninr. 9.A.1.d Packet Pg. 110 Attachment: Attachment C - Immokalee CRA, June 16, 2021 Meeting Approval Recommendation and Vote (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Colhs Counly Community Rdeelopment Agency - IIIIMOKALEE CRA Enclosure I ilhe Roce to Cdl Hm I MINUTES Meeting of the Community Redevelopment Area Immokalee Local Redevelopment Advisory Board on June 16,2021. The Advisory board members, staff, and public appeared virtually and in person. Hybrid Remote Public Meeting Immokalee CRA CareerSource SWFL 750 South 5th Street Immokalee,FL 34142 A. Call to Order. The meeting was called to order by Dr. Frank B. Pledge of Alleeiance and Prayer Dr. Frank Nappo, CRA Chair, led the Pledge and Pastor "Mike" Facundo led prayer Christie Betancourt opened roll was for the CRA board. Dr. Frank Nappo, Yvar Pierre,Edward "Ski" Olesky, Michael "Mike" Facundo, Estil :1 8). Andrea Halman. Patricia "Anne" Delute, Berneitha McNair, Eduardo Gloria, Breault, Sarai Murillo, and Commissioner Yvonne Blair, and Monica Acosta. Barron ictoria Dottie Cook, John Tobin, and Silvia Casabianca. D Staffannounced ber was on by Zoom when the meeting started. Action:Mn Ski a motion to allow board members on Zoom voting privileges. Mr. Francisco "Frank" Leon seconded the motion and it passed by unanimous vote. 6-0. E. Approval of Agenda. Staffpresented agenda to the board for approval. Action: Mr. Ski Oleslcy made a motion to approve the agenda as presented. Mr. Msrk Lemke seconded the motion and it passed by unonimous vote. 7-0. Chair at C vonette "Bill" 1 Forester, 9.A.1.d Packet Pg. 111 Attachment: Attachment C - Immokalee CRA, June 16, 2021 Meeting Approval Recommendation and Vote (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Colfier Cgunty Communily Rdeyelopment Agency - IMA,IOKALEE CRA i The Ploce to Coll Ftorre ! contained the public notice for this English and Spanish. 2. Public Comment speaker slips they feel it necessary. 3. CommunityPresentations i. Florida Fish and Wildlife Mr. Barron Moody, with the F and Wi an that Po as the C include U after pro CRA staff reiterated the public 3-minute Enclosure I the FDOT Plan flyer in slip The more time if Divi Fisheries Management addressed the board. He gave Marina, giving credit to County: Parks and Recreation, C Other collaborative partners and Big Cypress Basin of South Florida Water -dollar project of dredging Lake Trafford that over 6 million yards of mucky material from the of the dredging FWC stocked the lake with a large F. Approval of Consent Agenda. l. Minutes i. CRA Advisory Board Meeting for April 2l,2O2l (Enclosure l) 2. Budget Reports (Enclosure 2) 3. Community Meetings (Enclosure 3) Action: Mr. Mark Lemke mode a motion to approve the Agenda as presented Mr. Ski OleslE seconded the motion and it possed by unanimous vote. G. Announcements. 1. CommunicationsFolder Staff reviewed the communications folder of the public. The folder bass numerous planting projects of bull rush plants to help in the lake. This allowed for tournament fishing to turnout. Unfortunately, Hurricane Irma caused some significant conditions in Lake Trafford causing the detection of spawning The baby fish aren't surviving because of the lack of submersed aquatic AV). They will continue to stock fish at the lake until the habitat Their desired future conditions are increased SAV, increased sunlightconditions get penetration, water clarity, vegetation growth, and continued partnership development. All collaborators and the community remain committed to enhancing and recovery of Lake Trafford. *Presentation is attached to the minutes for the record 2 bottom of the Past happened of diverse with the 9.A.1.d Packet Pg. 112 Attachment: Attachment C - Immokalee CRA, June 16, 2021 Meeting Approval Recommendation and Vote (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Coi[er Counly Communfy Redeelopment Agency I'IAMOKALEE CRA i The Ploce ro Colt Hm ! Enclosure I ball fields for the H. New Business l. RCMA - MPUD Rezoning Petition - Lake Trafford (Enclosure 4) Wayne Arnold and Mike Delute with Grady Minor and Associates addressed the board. They gave a brief overview of their proposed plan. They are trying to collaborate with Parks and Recreation to allow for a field use to be able to help the community with recreational facilities. They will have to discuss with Parks and Recreation to see if it is doable. One of the main reasons for RCMA building on this their current building is not big enough and parking is an issue at the Main Street also see a need for affordable housing for their teachers, part of the problem here is the affordability of housing. RCMA has also deeded over part of the land to Dr. Frank Nappo asked that each board ve their Mr. Mark Lemke supports the idea; he community if possible. it nice to Ms. Yvar Pierre supports the has their current location and the board has witnessed that over the years.good for the community Mr. Francisco for the community. Mr. Edward his learn more before he comments on his support. that be good for the community and if a letter of be he is working with this project. Dr.idea;the concept of working with Parks and Recreation of the Ms. Andrea the Fire Department had been notified Commissioner McDaniel asked that they make sure the infrastructure as far as roads allow traffic relief. After much discussion the original motion to support the project was amended to include continued discussions about the ball fields and traffic concerns. *Presentation is attached to the minutes for the record 3 lesky appo 9.A.1.d Packet Pg. 113 Attachment: Attachment C - Immokalee CRA, June 16, 2021 Meeting Approval Recommendation and Vote (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Action: Mr. Francisco "Frank" Leon made a motion to support the project and encourage the continued discussions with Parks and Recreation about athleticfields and recommend that the assurance of traffic coming in ond out of the school are addressed. Mr. Mark Lemke seconded the motion, Mr. Michael "Mike" Facundo abstained and it passed by vote. 7-0-1. 2. Catholic Charities Proposal (Enclosure 5) Ms. Debrah Forester, CRA Director, addressed the board wi enclosure 5. The Catholic Charities, Diocese of Venice, Inc., sent a letter of intent to the CRA ownership of the property owned on 9ft street by the CRA. Along with the letter is plan for the property. The development of this site would be a chance for with the Catholic Charities Mr. Eduardo Gloria, Chief Operating Officer lic and David Corban, Architect Coller County Communrly Redevelopment Agency - IN,IMOKALEE CRA Enclosure I ilhePbcetocc{ Hom! board.has been serving the to support the the community of all backgrounds, although the charity has the Catholic in it, Catho do notjust serve the Catholic community but the community developing a vision over the last couple of with input of the , local officials, and more importantly of They are proposing to develop the 7 and one-half acres on the southwest and 9th which can be seen in the draft located on Enclosure 5. The development as the expansion of Guadalupe's Social Services a adult education classes, along with a myriad It will lity, a community room with free Wi-Fi,or outpost for a University such as or office space, CRA office space, affordable at to be located on the front end of West Main be doing business in Immokalee but could or groups that are minority owned and need can feet. They envision a green space in the middle a weekend farmers market, theater in the "green", things that between entities here, not just Catholic Charities. This the CRA parcel that is located on the comer of 96 and Main S of the site is about 2 acres. They would like to acquire the property by through a combination of things that would benefit the community Dr. FrankNappo the original thought of acquiring this property was for CRA to build a community center,has seen what can happen in the downturn of the economy, that last one took ten years to recover from. His main concern is selling the property for a project and then ten years from now still seeing a vacant property. He asked if this was a funded project or will they acquire the property then look for funding. Mr. Eduardo Gloria understands Dr. Nappo's concern and appreciates that he is bringing those concerns to their attention. To answer his question on funding, y€S, they are very well funded, as an organization they have plenty in their reserves and have the backing of the Diocese of Venice. 4 and Principal of Corban Architecture, Immokalee community for over 40 Coast able to host support great includes CRA'S 9.A.1.d Packet Pg. 114 Attachment: Attachment C - Immokalee CRA, June 16, 2021 Meeting Approval Recommendation and Vote (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Colher Counly Communily Rdg/elopmenl Agency - IMMOKALEE CRA Enclosure I ittre Ploce ro Coll xqre i They have developed similar type projects over many years and have successfully completed them including the affordable housing part. They are not new to space of development and they are very familiar with how the projects work, they know they have their work cut out for them in order to do this project. They are well funded and are prepared to see this project through. As an added note, they did not originally plan to acquire the CRA property, it was not part of the plan, they have nine acres of property that is next to the Guadalupe Parish. An opportunity came about when a donor approached them with two million dollars to begin looking at this and other donors have stepped up quickly. Without even starting and support this project already. a capital campaign there several people willing to step up Commissioner William "Bill" McDaniel doesn't CRA needs to construct another building or manage and maintain it. There are that they are proposing. The potential of an urgent care facility in our IS has would be a collaborative arduous task. There is aopportunity seeing that the hospital at preliminary interest with the Health collaboration with NCH and Physicians not only the community but the CRA as community center to host the MSTU he is excited to see the Mr. Michael "Mike" Facundo etwork managing rgent care facility in He project it would benefit home and the steps to go but will be biased but it's great to see He likes the concept and might be great as well. There There are still how they thinks the use of near is definitely care only is unsure of is how to collaborate as a CRA, if it or Catholic Charities, but the concept and proposal to look a certain way and have presence in thatare great. CRA be that to be worked out on what is more beneficial be beneficial for the community as well. If the CRA just like to have more discussion on the possibilities. He mem thoughts. Mr. Mark the land, giving it up, and having no control over what happens is not what he he would rather the CRA work together with Catholic Charities He also agrees wi this is an opportunity to start the process of what the CRA has wanted for Main Street all He likes the idea of having condos over the retail spaces and having it look like what the CRA has envisioned for Main Street. Urgent care is a great idea and collaborating with the Health Care Network is great. Even better if the community can afford it, they won't go to a place that they can't afford. Mr. Eduardo Gloria asked to speak before moving on to the next board member, he thanked Mike and Mark for their feedback. He also wanted all of the board members to know that collaboration with the CRA is a great option. He has seen firsthand that a collaborative project with a CRA board 5 Frank N CRA as land what get every open for an 9.A.1.d Packet Pg. 115 Attachment: Attachment C - Immokalee CRA, June 16, 2021 Meeting Approval Recommendation and Vote (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA ilhePloceloCdl Fbm! I'IAMOKALEE CRA sign up for a to Enclosure I this one to have some It is a win, win, everyone in the work. They did this in Miami with a project called Camillus House. They built an 88-million-dollar campus in the Overtown Park West CRA District, they received ten million dollars from the CRA as a gift in partnership for the development of that property. It was about 42 million in public funding which included CDBG, New Market Tax Credit, and surtax money and the rest was private donation in order to get the project done. The community room they built was a resounding success and is the CRA's official meeting spot still to this day. High Schools are able to have their graduation ceremonies there. They only charge a nominal fee for the cleaning of the space, but it is available to the community. He just wants everyone to that what they are offering is an asset for everyone not just Catholic Charities. The idea has been done, and it works. It is a great partnership with the CRA to have the CRA with Catholic Charities on that site this point Catholic Charities is openbecause it adds legitimacy and presence to the entire to many different options to be able to work with the parcel. As for the aspect of the urgent care facility, Catholic is to health care to the community, they understand that just can't pay,are several doctors that are willing to come to do the work because of their student debt forgiven for giving for everyone involved. They want to community. Housing is to have housing for income families that need funding, they can serve everyone in their homes Ms. Yvar concern is like services that they for everyone,want to be able but not ive to just that, there are so many low as well.can stay away from government and and be in charge of who can live CRA and Catholic Charities. Her people community. She would like for the urgent care of facility be open likes of the expansion of Social Services. not getting federal money to help with the ofstatus. The expansion ofSocial Services the students they see walking from the Middle School going as well. Mr. F supports the idea of partnership, he likes the expansion of Social Services,the low-income housing. There is already a development that is golng up on the same thing, does the housing have to be low-income and rentals. Mr. Eduardo Gloria that the majority of the units will be at competitive pricing. They are looking at affordable at market rate. They want to have a mix so that there is balance and so that they can stay true to their mission, which is to provide an on-going service. This is why they don't have real estate transactions. Mr. Edward "Ski" Olesky does not want to sell at this time and would like to discuss more over the options available. that 1n 6 "Frank" ect would they kind of Colher Cou1ry Communily Rederelopment Agefl(y 9.A.1.d Packet Pg. 116 Attachment: Attachment C - Immokalee CRA, June 16, 2021 Meeting Approval Recommendation and Vote (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Colher Counly Communrty Rdsdopmsl Agency - IMMOKALEE CRA Enclosure I i Ih€ Plo(e ro Coll FtqrE ! Mr. Estil Null agrees with Ski, there needs to be more discussion before deciding on the property Ms. Andrea Halman likes the idea of the green space and keeping the big tree that is there, as for the property, she feels that the CRA should keep it and go into partnership versus just selling it so that the CRA can have a say in what is built. She is concerned with the affordable housing, there are teachers, firefighters, and police officers here that need housing. More thought should be put into that category, and forthe people that in Immokalee for low-income already. stay all year long.is lots of housing being developed Dr. Frank Nappo agreed with Estil and Ski, there lot more discussion. If the property is sold there would need to be an escape clause doesn't deliver, then the property would come back to the CRA.in the economy, we have to take into consideration all options and can be Ms. Debrah Forester commented that we today, but asks the board for their support for staff to enter into a with all of the board members comments to partnership Charities. If the board supports the idea if the with Catholic Charities, then she can work with the County Managers to some terms. There is a process that has to happen and then try to board in September Dr. Frank all Mr. Michael decision. He that the details would help to make a better educated and terms is a good idea. Mr to get and leam what we are allowed to do and what the ls necessary. that research is the best way Mr. Edward that staff should get the information to be able to decide. Mr. Estill Null the research of options. Ms. Andrea Halman agreed. After much discussion the board agreed that it would be a good idea for staff to move forward with negotiations and bring back all options. 7 options Pierre "Frank" 9.A.1.d Packet Pg. 117 Attachment: Attachment C - Immokalee CRA, June 16, 2021 Meeting Approval Recommendation and Vote (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Colher County Commun[y Redeelopment Agency IN,IMOKALEE CRA Enclosure I i lhe Plo(e to Co0 Horre ! Action: Mr. Michael "Mike" Facundo made a motion to allow staff to move forward with negotiotions and o terms sheet. Mn Froncisco "Frank" Leon seconded the motion and it passed by unonimous vote. 8-0. I. Old Business 1. Immokalee Area Master Plan i. IAMP Policies - LDC Amendments Staff is waiting for responses from the Henderlong and his staff will let staff know when the next LDC willbe held. 2. Redevelopment Plan Updates Staff will be having a workshop on F 18, to gather all has been collected the goals and thenthrough surveys and meetings. This will be to put writing the policies for each goal to help Plan J. Staff Reports l. Operations Manager Report 6) Ms. Christie Betancourt enclosure 6. Mr. David Corban is also the architect for the van for the Center and provided updates to that project.almost the that will house the tutoring and mentoring school for about I 50 people. The plan is to be by J,been getting materials. He can coordinate hat board bers ifthey are interested. to the opinion of the two architects in the room, on the vision and cultural excitement of is being built in Immokalee. It seems that and to be the trend, but do they feel that the cultural to this style of building, maybe with design or colors? said the person that came to his mind was Luis Barragin, a bright colors, so it is doable, incorporation of color can help with vibrancy,one style and expect it work in every aspect ofthe community. The one maJor codes. They hinder the architectural side when it comes to color; it is important to take now to help update the LDC codes in Immokalee to help make the changes for the Mr. David Corban agreed that some of the architecture in Naples is that contemporary that Debrah was talking about, but his projects here in Immokalee he considers more of an updated Florida Style. If you look at what they did for the Shelter in Immokalee, the property is surrounded by residential neighborhoods, rather than do one big building, they broke it down to five buildings for a residential scale. They always try to incorporate the Florida Cracker ideas on building which includes large overhangs, windows that can open, and courtyards. This style was used at both the 8 F, to Mr buildings are Immokalee "Mike" F that can't 9.A.1.d Packet Pg. 118 Attachment: Attachment C - Immokalee CRA, June 16, 2021 Meeting Approval Recommendation and Vote (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Coller Counly Commun[y Redsrelopmenl Agency IAAMOKALEE CRA iThe f{o(e to Coll ndre ! lasts forever. He feels that you can contemporarily part with colors. He also stated that Immokalee is so is needed to accommodate for future buildings. 2. Project Manager Report (Enclosure 7) Ms. Yvonne Blair reviewed the project Road Maintenance to address the S 5ft and Street raised RPMs. Agnoli, Barber and prepanng a III Sidewalk Project on Eustis and West Enclosure I design and still address the cultural a different architectural standard 7. Staff is coordinating with on. They will be installing for the design of the Phase Shelter and will be used at the Guadalupe Center. The Guadalupe Center has already started discussing colors for inside and outside of the classrooms. The issue being the LDC codes, it states that you can't use primary colors, so when choosing colors, you have to try and choose the brightest color possible. An example was Zocalo Park, they had to choose the brightest color possible in accordance with the Collier County LDC codes. He agreed with Mike in that Luis Barrag6n's use of simple forms and bright colors show that it works and it's not a trend, it's forever. That is one aspect that they try to do in architecture, they stay away from trends and make it something that A banner was Street. The by the MSTU board and was relocated by the historical sign the cemetery on place. He feels that its part of the those will be ordered for the new Facilities Dr. Frank Nappo asked Main Street. He would history of Immokalee, a if like could be it is be plaque that explains what it is and the historical value would that Ms. Debrah that Parks or the Museum to see about getting CRA to getting one, then staff can look into the 8. Business and Economic Research at the Greater Naples Cham the board. Ms. Schmees explained that the Chamber has a contract , it's a public/private partnership in which the Chamber runs certain Economic including the Business Retention and Expansion Program. They answer lnqulnes the Collier Economic Development Office (EDO) website. They handle New Business Relocations; the website also serves as a point of contact for State Economic Development Organizations and represents the interest of the Business community of Collier County. She works in partnership with the CRA and other organizations within the county to promote growth and economic diversity connecting businesses to resources and making sure that the community stays business friendly to help facilitate $owth. She just wants to make sure everyone knows that she is a resource, her colleague, Alex Breault, Director of Work Based Learning, is with her today. They will be meeting with a few companies today. She hopes to be to K. ,) 3 Ms I done. updates Schmees, I 9.A.1.d Packet Pg. 119 Attachment: Attachment C - Immokalee CRA, June 16, 2021 Meeting Approval Recommendation and Vote (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Cdiier Counly Communrty Rede,relopmenl Agefty - ll ftiOKALEE CRA size of the house is also an issue to accommodate that size home. versus the use ofthe garage for cars. Mr. Francisco work was great. Mr. Allan Garcia Enclosure 1 in the driveway and were parked in their driveway, to garage they two parcels is the storage space for bigger families have done, and the foundation A&R, masonry opened there was land that had been set overcrowding of cars, but with the recession on August 18,2021at 9:00 A.M. at CareerSource SWFL., Adj @ rl:42 A.M. ilhe Ploce to Coll lhm I in Immokalee at least one day a month and plans to try and attend the CRA meeting as well as the Immokalee Chamber Breakfast meetings. She understands that there are specific needs in this community that don't align with other parts of the county. She thanked everyone for their time, and she looks forward to representing as well integrating herself into the community. 4. Other Agency No other Agency updates. L. Citizens Comments. Mr. Allan Garcia, CEO of A&R Builders of SWFL Inc.,the board, his company is currently building homes in Immokalee. They have homes that are from 1300 square feet up to 2800 square feet under air. They have two homes going up in community. Dr. Frank Nappo asked about the driveways, he when he was there that there wasn't any green space because all of the cars :t fit parked on the grass. They have two ROOF and their residents don't own vehicles. and they Mr. Allan Garcia stated that the issue in They garages, but thethe that the ln Ms to M.N I N were 10 9.A.1.d Packet Pg. 120 Attachment: Attachment C - Immokalee CRA, June 16, 2021 Meeting Approval Recommendation and Vote (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, FL 34134  239-947-1144  engineering@gradyminor.com  www.gradyminor.com RCMA Immokalee MPUD (PL20200001827) Application and Supporting Documents Sept. 16, 2021 CCPC Hearing 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 121 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. Ph. 239-947-1144 Fax. 239-947-0375 3800 Via Del Rey EB 0005151 LB 0005151 LC 26000266 Bonita Springs, FL 34134 www.gradyminor.com January 5, 2021 Mr. Timothy Finn, AICP Collier County Growth Management Department Zoning Division 2800 N Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 RE: Collier County Application for Public Hearing, RCMA Immokalee MPUD Rezone (PL20200001827), Submittal 1 Dear Mr. Finn: A Collier County application for Public Hearing for a Planned Unit Development (PUD) rezone for properties located on the northwest quadrant of Lake Trafford Road and Carson Road is being filed electronically for review. This application proposes to rezone a 63+/- acre parcel to allow a 250-student childcare center, 700 student K-8 charter school, community center and a maximum of 160 multi-family residential dwelling units. Documents filed with submittal 1 include the following: 1. Cover Letter 2. Application for a Public Hearing for PUD Rezone 3. Evaluation Criteria 4. Pre-application meeting notes 5. Affidavit of Authorization 6. Property Ownership Disclosure Form 7. Covenant of Unified Control 8. Addressing Checklist 9. Warranty Deed(s) 10. Boundary Survey 11. Aerial Location Map 12. Environmental Data Requirements 13. Traffic Impact Study 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 122 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) Mr. Timothy Finn, AICP RE: Collier County Application for Public Hearing, RCMA Immokalee CFPUD Rezone (PL20200001827), Submittal 1 January 5, 2021 Page 2 of 2 14. Waiver of Historic Survey 15. School Impact Analysis Application 16. PUD Exhibits A-F 17. Deviation Justifications 18. Ordinance 91-072 Please feel free to contact Rich Yovanovich at 435-3535 or me should you have any questions. Sincerely, D. Wayne Arnold, AICP c: Redlands Christian Migrant Association, Inc. GradyMinor File (RCMALT) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 123 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.collierĐŽƵŶƚLJ͘ŐŽǀ (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 0DUFK Page 1 of 11 Application for a Public Hearing for PUD Rezone, Amendment to PUD or PUD to PUD Rezone PETITION NO PROJECT NAME DATE PROCESSED PUD Rezone (PUDZ): LDC subsection 10.02.13 A.-F., Ch. 3 G. 1 of the Administrative Code Amendment to PUD (PUDA): LDC subsection 10.02.13 E. and Ch. 3 G. 2 of the Administrative Code PUD to PUD Rezone (PUDR): LDC subsection 10.02.13 A.-F. APPLICANT CONTACT INFORMATION Name of Property Owner(s): _________________________________________________________ Name of Applicant if different than owner: _____________________________________________ Address: _________________________City: _______________ State: _________ ZIP: ___________ Telephone: _______________________ Cell: ______________________ Fax: __________________ E-Mail Address: ____________________________________________________________________ Name of Agent: ____________________________________________________________________ Firm: _____________________________________________________________________________ Address: ____________________________City: _______________ State: _______ ZIP: __________ Telephone: ____________________ Cell: ____________________ Fax: _______________________ E-Mail Address: ____________________________________________________________________ Be aware that Collier County has lobbyist regulations. Guide yourself accordingly and ensure that you are in compliance with these regulations. To be completed by staff Barron Collier Partnership LLLP Redlands Christian Migrant Association, Inc. 402 W. Main Street Immokalee FL 34112 mike@hfarchitects.net D. Wayne Arnold, AICP Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey Bonita Springs FL 34134 239.947.1144 warnold@gradyminor.com 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 124 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT ǁǁǁ͘ĐŽůůŝĞƌĐŽƵŶƚLJ͘ŐŽǀ (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 0DUFK Page 2 of 11 REZONE REQUEST This application is requesting a rezone from: _________________________ Zoning district(s) to the ________________________________ zoning district(s). Present Use of the Property: _________________________________________________________ Proposed Use (or range of uses) of the property: _________________________________________ Original PUD Name: ________________________________________________________________ Ordinance No.: ____________________________________________________________________ PROPERTY INFORMATION On a separate sheet attached to the application, provide a detailed legal description of the property covered by the application: x If the request involves changes to more than one zoning district, the applicant shall include a separate legal description for property involved in each district; x The applicant shall submit 4 copies of a recent survey (completed within the last six months, maximum 1" to 400' scale), if required to do so at the pre-application meeting; and x The applicant is responsible for supplying the correct legal description. If questions arise concerning the legal description, an engineer's certification or sealed survey may be required. Section/Township/Range: / / Lot: Block: Subdivision: ___________________________________________________ Metes & Bounds Description: _________________________________________________________ Plat Book: Page #: Property I.D. Number: ____________________________________ Size of Property: _______ ft. x _______ ft. = ________ Total Sq. Ft. Acres: _________ Address/ General Location of Subject Property: __________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________ PUD District (refer to LDC subsection 2.03.06 C): Commercial Residential Community Facilities Industrial Mixed Use Other: ________________ A (ST/W-1 through ST/W-4) RCMA Immokalee MPUD Undeveloped agricultural land N.A. N.A. 31 46 29 N.A. N.A.N.A. N.A. N.A. 00071960001 2333 1158 2,710,278 62.2+/- Northwest quadrant of Lake Trafford Road and Carson Road 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 125 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT ǁǁǁ͘ĐŽůůŝĞƌĐŽƵŶƚLJ͘ŐŽǀ (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 0DUFK Page 3 of 11 ADJACENT ZONING AND LAND USE Zoning Land Use N S E W If the owner of the subject property owns contiguous property please provide a detailed legal description of the entire contiguous property on a separate sheet attached to the application. Section/Township/Range: / / Lot: Block: Subdivision: ___________________________________________________ Plat Book: Page #: Property I.D. Number: ____________________________________ Metes & Bounds Description: _________________________________________________________ ASSOCIATIONS Required: List all registered Home Owner Association(s) that could be affected by this petition. Provide additional sheets if necessary. Information can be found on the Board of County Commissioner’s website at http://www.colliergov.net/Index.aspx?page=774. Name of Homeowner Association: _________________________________________________ Mailing Address: ____________________________ City: _________ State: ______ ZIP: ______ Name of Homeowner Association: _________________________________________________ Mailing Address: ____________________________ City: _________ State: ______ ZIP: ______ Name of Homeowner Association: _________________________________________________ Mailing Address: ____________________________ City: _________ State: ______ ZIP: ______ Name of Homeowner Association: _________________________________________________ Mailing Address: ____________________________ City: _________ State: ______ ZIP: ______ Name of Homeowner Association: _________________________________________________ Mailing Address: ____________________________ City: _________ State: ______ ZIP: ______ VR Undeveloped and Residential Arrowhead PUD Residential MH, P, C-3 and Harvest for Humanity PUD Church, County Utility Site, Convenience Store, Fire Station and Residential A and Liberty Landing RPUD Lake Trafford Elementary School and Residential N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A.N.A. N.A. N.A.N.A. N.A. Arrowhead Reserve Property Owners Association, Inc. 5150 Tamiami Trail N #303 Naples FL 34103 Jubilation Community Association, Inc. 4099 Tamiami Trail N #403 Naples FL 34103 Liberty Landing Homeowners Association, Inc. 6704 Lone Oak Boulevard Naples FL 34109 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 126 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT ǁǁǁ͘ĐŽůůŝĞƌĐŽƵŶƚLJ͘ŐŽǀ (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 0DUFK Page 4 of 11 EVALUATION CRITERIA Pursuant to LDC subsections 10.02.13 B, 10.02.08 F and Chapter 3 G. of the Administrative Code, staff’s analysis and recommendation to the Planning Commission, and the Planning Commission’s recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners shall be based upon consideration of the applicable criteria. On a separate sheet attached to the application, provide a narrative statement describing the rezone request with specific reference to the criteria below. Include any backup materials and documentation in support of the request. a. The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer, water, and other utilities. b. Adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of any proposed agreements, contract, or other instruments, or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense. Findings and recommendations of this type shall be made only after consultation with the county attorney. c. Conformity of the proposed PUD with the goals, objectives and policies of the Growth Management Plan. (This is to include identifying what Sub-district, policy or other provision allows the requested uses/density, and fully explaining/addressing all criteria or conditions of that Sub-district, policy or other provision.) d. The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening requirements. e. The adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the development. f. The timing or sequence of development for the purpose of assuring the adequacy of available improvements and facilities, both public and private. g. The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion. h. Conformity with PUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the particular case, based on determination that such modifications of justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations. Deed Restrictions: The County is legally precluded from enforcing deed restrictions; however, many communities have adopted such restrictions. You may wish to contact the civic or property owners association in the area for which this use is being requested in order to ascertain whether or not the request is affected by existing deed restrictions. 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 127 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT ǁǁǁ͘ĐŽůůŝĞƌĐŽƵŶƚLJ͘ŐŽǀ (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 0DUFK Page 5 of 11 Previous land use petitions on the subject property: To your knowledge, has a public hearing been held on this property within the last year? If so, what was the nature of that hearing? __________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________ Official Interpretations or Zoning Verifications: To your knowledge, has there been an official interpretation or zoning verification rendered on this property within the last year? Yes No if so please provide copies. PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIREMENTS This land use petition requires a Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM), pursuant to Chapter 3 E. of the Administrative Code and LDC section 10.03.06. Following the NIM, the applicant will submit a written summary and any commitments that have been made at the meeting. Refer to Chapter 8 B. of the Administrative Code for the NIM procedural requirements. Chapter 8 of the Administrative Code requires that the applicant must remove their public hearing advertising sign(s) after final action is taken by the Board of County Commissioners. Based on the Board's final action on this item, please remove all public hearing advertising sign(s) immediately. RECORDING OF DEVELOPER COMMITMENTS Within 30 days of adoption of the Ordinance, the owner or developer (specify name) at their expense shall record in the Public Records of Collier County a Memorandum of Understanding of Developer Commitments or Notice of Developer Commitments that contains the legal description of the property that is the subject of the land use petition and contains each and every commitment of the owner or developer specified in the Ordinance. The Memorandum or Notice shall be in form acceptable to the County and shall comply with the recording requirements of Chapter 695, FS. A recorded copy of the Memorandum or Notice shall be provided to the Collier County Planned Unit Development Monitoring staff within 15 days of recording of said Memorandum or Notice. LDC subsection 10.02.08 D This application will be considered “open” when the determination of “sufficiency” has been made and the application is assigned a petition processing number. The application will be considered “closed” when the petitioner withdraws the application through written notice or ceases to supply necessary information to continue processing or otherwise actively pursue the rezoning, amendment or change, for a period of 6 months. An application deemed “closed” will not receive further processing and an application “closed” through inactivity shall be deemed withdrawn. An application deemed “closed” may be re-opened by submission of a new application, repayment of all application fees and the grant of a determination of “sufficiency”. Further review of the request will be subject to the then current code. No 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 128 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT ǁǁǁ͘ĐŽůůŝĞƌĐŽƵŶƚLJ͘ŐŽǀ (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 0DUFK Page 6 of 11 STATEMENT OF UTILITY PROVISIONS FOR PUD REZONE REQUEST APPLICANT CONTACT INFORMATION Name of Applicant(s): _______________________________________________________________ Address: _________________________________ City: ___________ State: ________ ZIP: _______ Telephone: ____________________ Cell: _____________________ Fax: ______________________ E-Mail Address: ____________________________________________________________________ Address of Subject Property (If available): ______________________________________________ City: _________________ State: ________ ZIP: _________ PROPERTY INFORMATION Section/Township/Range: / / Lot: Block: Subdivision: ___________________________________________________ Metes & Bounds Description: _________________________________________________________ Plat Book: Page #: Property I.D. Number: ____________________________________ TYPE OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL TO BE PROVIDED Check applicable system: a. County Utility System b. City Utility System c. Franchised Utility System Provide Name: __________________________ d. Package Treatment Plant (GPD Capacity): _________________________ e. Septic System TYPE OF WATER SERVICE TO BE PROVIDED Check applicable system: a. County Utility System b. City Utility System c. Franchised Utility System Provide Name: __________________________ d. Private System (Well) Total Population to be Served: ________________________________________________________ Peak and Average Daily Demands: A. Water-Peak: _________ Average Daily: __________ B. Sewer-Peak: _________ Average Daily: __________ If proposing to be connected to Collier County Regional Water System, please provide the date service is expected to be required: ____________________________________________________ Redlands Christian Migrant Association, Inc. 402 W. Main Street Immokalee FL 34112 mike@hfarchitects.net N/A Immokalee FL 34112 31 46 29 N.A. N.A.N.A. N.A. N.A.00071960001 X Immokalee Sewer and Water District X Immokalee Sewer and Water District N.A. 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 129 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT ǁǁǁ͘ĐŽůůŝĞƌĐŽƵŶƚLJ͘ŐŽǀ (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 0DUFK Page 7 of 11 Narrative statement: Provide a brief and concise narrative statement and schematic drawing of sewage treatment process to be used as well as a specific statement regarding the method of affluent and sludge disposal. If percolation ponds are to be used, then percolation data and soil involved shall be provided from tests prepared and certified by a professional engineer. __________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________ Collier County Utility Dedication Statement: If the project is located within the service boundaries of Collier County’s utility service system, a notarized statement shall be provided agreeing to dedicate the water distribution and sewage collection facilities within the project area to the Collier County Utilities. This shall occur upon completion of the construction of these facilities in accordance with all applicable County ordinances in effect at that time. This statement shall also include an agreement that the applicable system development charges and connection fees will be paid to the County Utilities Division prior to the issuance of building permits by the County. If applicable, the statement shall contain an agreement to dedicate the appropriate utility easements for serving the water and sewer systems. __________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________ Statement of Availability Capacity from other Providers: Unless waived or otherwise provided for at the pre-application meeting, if the project is to receive sewer or potable water services from any provider other than the County, a statement from that provider indicating adequate capacity to serve the project shall be provided. N.A. N.A. 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 130 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT ǁǁǁ͘ĐŽůůŝĞƌĐŽƵŶƚLJ͘ŐŽǀ (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Page 8 of 11 COVENANT OF UNIFIED CONTROL The undersigned do hereby swear or affirm that we are the fee simple titleholders and owners of record of property commonly known as ____________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________ (Street address and City, State and Zip Code) and legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto. The property described herein is the subject of an application for ______________ planned unit development (______________PUD) zoning. We hereby designate___________________, legal representative thereof, as the legal representatives of the property and as such, these individuals are authorized to legally bind all owners of the property in the course of seeking the necessary approvals to develop. This authority includes, but is not limited to, the hiring and authorization of agents to assist in the preparation of applications, plans, surveys, and studies necessary to obtain zoning approval on the site. These representatives will remain the only entity to authorize development activity on the property until such time as a new or amended covenant of unified control is delivered to Collier County. The undersigned recognize the following and will be guided accordingly in the pursuit of development of the project: 1. The property will be developed and used in conformity with the approved master plan including all conditions placed on the development and all commitments agreed to by the applicant in connection with the planned unit development rezoning. 2. The legal representative identified herein is responsible for compliance with all terms, conditions, safeguards, and stipulations made at the time of approval of the master plan, even if the property is subsequently sold in whole or in part, unless and until a new or amended covenant of unified control is delivered to and recorded by Collier County. 3. A departure from the provisions of the approved plans or a failure to comply with any requirements, conditions, or safeguards provided for in the planned unit development process will constitute a violation of the Land Development Code. 4. All terms and conditions of the planned unit development approval will be incorporated into covenants and restrictions which run with the land so as to provide notice to subsequent owners that all development activity within the planned unit development must be consistent with those terms and conditions. 5. So long as this covenant is in force, Collier County can, upon the discovery of noncompliance with the terms, safeguards, and conditions of the planned unit development, seek equitable relief as necessary to compel compliance. The County will not issue permits, certificates, or licenses to occupy or use any part of the planned unit development and the County may stop ongoing construction activity until the project is brought into compliance with all terms, conditions and safeguards of the planned unit development. ___________________________________ Owner ___________________________________ Printed Name ___________________________________ Owner ____________________________________ Printed Name STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER dŚĞĨŽƌĞŐŽŝŶŐŝŶƐƚƌƵŵĞŶƚǁĂƐĂĐŬŶŽǁůĞŐĞĚďĞĨŽƌĞŵĞďLJŵĞĂŶƐŽĨ ƉŚLJƐŝĐĂůƉƌĞƐĞŶĐĞŽƌŽŶůŝŶĞŶŽƚĂƌŝnjĂƚŝŽŶƚŚŝƐͺͺͺͺ ĚĂLJŽĨͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ͕ϮϬͺͺͺ͕ďLJ;ƉƌŝŶƚĞĚŶĂŵĞŽĨŽǁŶĞƌŽƌƋƵĂůŝĨŝĞƌͿͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ ^ƵĐŚƉĞƌƐŽŶ;ƐͿEŽƚĂƌLJWƵďůŝĐŵƵƐƚĐŚĞĐŬĂƉƉůŝĐĂďůĞďŽdž͗ ƌĞƉĞƌƐŽŶĂůůLJŬŶŽǁŶƚŽŵĞ ,ĂƐƉƌŽĚƵĐĞĚĂĐƵƌƌĞŶƚĚƌŝǀĞƌƐůŝĐĞŶƐĞͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ ,ĂƐƉƌŽĚƵĐĞĚͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺĂƐŝĚĞŶƚŝĨŝĐĂƚŝŽŶ͘ EŽƚĂƌLJ^ŝŐŶĂƚƵƌĞ͗ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ DĂƌĐŚϰ͕ϮϬϮϬ Notary ^ĞĂů 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 131 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT ǁǁǁ͘ĐŽůůŝĞƌĐŽƵŶƚLJ͘ŐŽǀ (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 0DUFK Page 9 of 11 Final Submittal Requirement Checklist for: PUD Rezone- Ch. 3 G. 1 of the Administrative Code Amendment to PUD- Ch. 3 G. 2 of the Administrative Code PUD to PUD Rezone- Ch. 3 G. 1 of the Administrative Code The following Submittal Requirement checklist is to be utilized during the Pre-Application Meeting and at time of application submittal. At final submittal, the checklist is to be completed and submitted with an up-to-date application. Please provide the submittal items in the exact order listed below, with cover sheets attached to each section. Incomplete submittals will not be accepted. A Model PUD Document is available online at http://www.colliercountyfl.gov/Home/ShowDocument?id=76983. REQUIREMENTS # OF COPIES REQUIRED NOT REQUIRED Cover Letter with Narrative Statement including a detailed description of why amendment is necessary 1 Completed Application with required attachments (download latest version) 1 Pre-application meeting notes 1 Affidavit of Authorization, signed and notarized 1 Property Ownership Disclosure Form 1 Notarized and completed Covenant of Unified Control 1 Completed Addressing Checklist 1 Warranty Deed(s) 1 List Identifying Owner and all parties of corporation 1 Signed and sealed Boundary Survey 1 Architectural Rendering of proposed structures 1 Current Aerial Photographs (available from Property Appraiser) with project boundary and, if vegetated, FLUCFCS Codes with legend included on aerial. 1 Statement of Utility Provisions 1 Environmental Data Requirements pursuant to LDC section 3.08.00 1 Environmental Data Requirements collated into a single Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) packet at time of public hearings. Coordinate with project planner at time of public hearings. Listed or Protected Species survey, less than 12 months old. Include copies of previous surveys. 1 Traffic Impact Study 1 Historical Survey 1 School Impact Analysis Application, if applicable 1 Electronic copy of all required documents 1 Completed Exhibits A-F (see below for additional information)+ List of requested deviations from the LDC with justification for each (this document is separate from Exhibit E) Checklist continues on next page X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 132 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT ǁǁǁ͘ĐŽůůŝĞƌĐŽƵŶƚLJ͘ŐŽǀ (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 0DUFK Page 10 of 11 Revised Conceptual Master Site Plan 24” x 36”and One 8 ½” x 11” copy Original PUD document/ordinance, and Master Plan 24” x 36” – Only if Amending the PUD Revised PUD document with changes crossed thru & underlined 1 Copy of Official Interpretation and/or Zoning Verification 1 *If located in Immokalee or seeking affordable housing, include an additional set of each submittal requirement +The following exhibits are to be completed on a separate document and attached to the application packet: Exhibit A: List of Permitted Uses Exhibit B: Development Standards Exhibit C: Master Plan- See Chapter 3 E. 1. of the Administrative Code Exhibit D: Legal Description Exhibit E: List of Requested LDC Deviations and justification for each Exhibit F: List of Development Commitments If located in RFMU (Rural Fringe Mixed Use) Receiving Land Areas Pursuant to LDC subsection 2.03.08.A.2.a.2.(b.)i.c., the applicant must contact the Florida Forest Service at 239- 690-3500 for information regarding “Wildfire Mitigation & Prevention Plan.” PLANNERS – INDICATE IF THE PETITION NEEDS TO BE ROUTED TO THE FOLLOWING REVIEWERS: School District (Residential Components): Amy Lockheart Conservancy of SWFL: Nichole Johnson Utilities Engineering: Eric Fey Parks and Recreation: Barry Williams (Director) Emergency Management: Dan Summers Immokalee Water/Sewer District: City of Naples: Robin Singer, Planning Director Other: City of Naples Utilities Other: ASSOCIATED FEES FOR APPLICATION Pre-Application Meeting: $500.00 PUD Rezone: $10,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre PUD to PUD Rezone: $8,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre PUD Amendment: $6,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre Comprehensive Planning Consistency Review: $2,250.00 Environmental Data Requirements-EIS Packet (submittal determined at pre-application meeting): $2,500.00 Listed or Protected Species Review (when an EIS is not required): $1,000.00 Transportation Review Fees: o Methodology Review: $500.00 *Additional fees to be determined at Methodology Meeting. o Minor Study Review: $750.00 o Major Study Review $1,500.00 X X X X X X X X X X X 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 133 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 0DUFK Page 11 of 11 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT ǁǁǁ͘ĐŽůůŝĞƌĐŽƵŶƚLJ͘ŐŽǀ Legal Advertising Fees: o CCPC: $1,125.00 o BCC: $500.00 School Concurrency Fee, if applicable: o Mitigation Fees, if application, to be determined by the School District in coordination with the County Fire Code Plans Review Fees are not listed, but are collected at the time of application submission and those fees are set forth by the Authority having jurisdiction. The Land Development Code requires Neighborhood Notification mailers for Applications headed to hearing, and this fee is collected prior to hearing. All checks payable to: Board of County Commissioners. As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is included in this submittal package. I understand that failure to include all necessary submittal information may result in the delay of processing this petition. *Additional fee for the 5th and subsequent re-submittal will be accessed at 20% of the original fee. ___________________________________ _____________ Signature of Petitioner or Agent Date ___________________________________ Printed named of signing party *Additional fee for the 5th and subsequent re-submi _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Signature of Petitioner oroo Agent X X D. Wayne Arnold, AICP April 9, 2021 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 134 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) RCMA Immokalee MPUD (PL20200000546) Evaluation Criteria March 31, 2021 Page 1 of 8 RCMALT Evaluation Criteria-r1.docx Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, FL 34134  239-947-1144  engineering@gradyminor.com  www.gradyminor.com Pursuant to LDC subsections 10.02.13 B, 10.02.08 F and Chapter 3 G. of the Administrative Code, staff’s analysis and recommendation to the Planning Commission, and the Planning Commission’s recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners shall be based upon consideration of the applicable criteria. Narrative Statement Describing Request This application proposes to rezone 63± acres from the Agricultural Zoning District (ST/W-1 through W- 4) to the RCMA Immokalee Mixed Use Planned Unit Development (MPUD) Zoning District to allow a 700 student K-8 Charter School, a 250-student pre-school, 160 multi-family dwelling units, which may include market rate, essential service and/or affordable housing units, and 5,000 square feet of Intermediate Commercial (C-3) uses and associated accessory uses. Access to the educational campus and housing will be from Lake Trafford Road, with a separate access to Carson Road to serve the small commercially designated tract. A conceptual master plan has been developed which depicts the general layout of the proposed campus including the location of the residential, educational commercial and recreation/open space areas. The subject property is located primarily in the High Residential Subdistrict with approximately two- thirds of acre of the property located within the Commerce Center-Mixed Use Subdistrict of the Immokalee Area Master Plan. The entire property is presently zoned A, Agriculture with the ST/W-1 through W-4 (wellfield protection overlay). PUD Rezone Considerations (LDC Section 10.02.13.B) a. The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer, water, and other utilities. The property is well-suited to be developed as the RCMA campus. A majority of the property was previously cleared for agricultural use; however, it is within the Immokalee Urban Area and has water and sewer services available to the property from the Immokalee Water/Sewer District. There are no current or anticipated level of service issues related to water/sewer. A traffic analysis has also been prepared which indicates that Lake Trafford Road will continue to operate at an acceptable level of service at build-out of the MPUD. b. Adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of any proposed agreements, contract, or other instruments, or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense. Findings and recommendations of this type shall be made only after consultation with the county attorney. 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 135 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) Page 2 of 8 The entirety of the property is under the unified control of Barron Collier Partnership, LLLP and under contract by the applicant, Redlands Christian Migrant Association, Inc. c. Conformity of the proposed PUD with the goals, objectives and policies of the Growth Management Plan. (This is to include identifying what Sub-district, policy or other provision allows the requested uses/density, and fully explaining/addressing all criteria or conditions of that Sub-district, policy or other provision.) The proposed MPUD is consistent with the Immokalee Area Master Plan (IAMP). The property is located within both the High Residential Subdistrict and the Commerce Center- Mixed Use Subdistrict. The High Residential Subdistrict permits multi-family residential development at a maximum density of 8 dwelling units per acre. The proposed 160 dwelling units equates to a density of approximately 2.6 dwelling units per acre. The .66+/- acre commercial tract was excluded from the acreage utilized in the density calculation. The proposed residential density is well within the maximum permissible base density of 8 dwelling units per acre. The non-residential educational uses are also consistent with the IAMP. The IAMP permits uses such as public and private schools, day care centers, and recreational uses as permitted uses within all of the Residential land use designations in the IAMP. The two small commercial tracts are located within the Commerce Center-Mixed Use land use designation. This land use designation permits a variety of commercial land uses ranging from C-1 through C-4 levels of intensity. The MPUD permits C-3 commercial land uses which is consistent with this future land use category. Policy 1.1.3 requires coordination regarding the timing, intensity and design of development to insure that adequate public facilities are available to service the proposed land uses. The project is subject to concurrency and no facility inadequacies are present or anticipated. Policy 1.1.4 emphasizes land use transition between land uses. The proposed multi-family dwelling units are separated from the nearest residences to the northwest by a vegetative preserve and natural buffer providing a large building separation. The multi-family dwellings are separated from the nearest single-family residences to the south by a wetland preserve and Lake Trafford Road. The commercial tracts are located adjacent to existing C-3 zoned property which include an Immokalee Fire Control District station and convenience store; therefore, no transition is necessary. Policy 1.4.3 encourages pedestrian friendly design for projects located within the Immokalee Urban Area. The proposed mixed-use project will provide internal sidewalks and pathways to link the various educational, residential and open space areas within the project. Sidewalk connections will be provided to the sidewalk that currently exists within the Lake Trafford Road ROW. 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 136 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) Page 3 of 8 Objective 3.1 of the IAMP provides for the protection of natural resources within the Immokalee Urban Area. A majority of the property has been previously been cleared and utilized for cattle grazing. There are two vegetative areas on the property located near the southwest and southeast boundaries of the property adjacent to Lake Trafford Road. A complete environmental assessment has been prepared and is included in the MPUD application materials. The Land Development Code requires that mixed use project provide 25% preservation of the existing on-site native vegetation. The minimum preserve area that will be provided on-site will be 5.8 acres. The site also falls within the ST overlay for the wellfield protection zones. None of the proposed uses are prohibited within the protection zones and all development will be in compliance with Section 3.06 of the Land Development Code which establishes the standards for all development within the zones. OBJECTIVE 7.1: Direct incompatible land uses away from listed animal species and their habitats. (The County relies on the listing process of State and Federal agencies to identify species that require special protection because of their endangered, threatened, or species of special concern status. Listed animal species are those species that the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission has designated as endangered, threatened, or species of special concern, in accordance with Rules 68A-27.003, 68A-27.004, and 68A-27.005, F.A.C. and those species designated by various federal agencies as Endangered and Threatened species published in 50 CFR 17.) A brief examination of the parcel found no listed animals on site. However, Black bears are known to inhabit these areas. The site does provide some functional habitat for small, medium mammals and birds. A listed species study was conducted and attached. This project site is not in a panther consultation zone. During the Environmental Resource Permit process this project will be reviewed by the appropriate regulatory agencies. This project meets the Objective of CCME Objective 7.1. All proposed impacts are being directed towards the already cleared pasture areas. The majority of the areas that still have native habitat are proposed as preserve. d. The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening requirements. The mixed-use project as proposed is compatible with the surrounding neighborhood. Lake Trafford Road services a variety of commercial, residential, recreational and educational uses. The RCMA education facilities proposed are already located in the Immokalee community and serve the local residents. The project provides buffers that will meet or exceed those required by the Land Development Code and are of a scale appropriate for the site and community. 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 137 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) Page 4 of 8 e. The adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the development. The MPUD provides for a significant amount of open space in the form of vegetative preserve, surface water management, and recreational open space associated the proposed educational facilities and residential development. The location of the open space areas provides for natural buffers to adjacent property as well as functional open space for the MPUD. The MPUD will exceed the code required 30% open space for a mixed- use project. f. The timing or sequence of development for the purpose of assuring the adequacy of available improvements and facilities, both public and private. The project will be required to meet local concurrency requirements for infrastructure. No existing or future deficiencies are anticipated. g. The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion. The MPUD as designed provides for internal expansion of the facilities if needed; however, there is not anticipated to expand beyond the 63 acres included in the MPUD. h. Conformity with PUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the particular case, based on determination that such modifications of justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations. The MPUD conforms with the requirements for a PUD. There are proposed deviations from the Land Development Code requested as part of the rezoning application which are warranted given the proposed uses. Justifications for these limited deviations are included in the application materials. LDC Section 10.02.08 F - Requirements for Amendments to the Official Zoning Atlas F. Nature of requirements of Planning Commission report. When pertaining to the rezoning of land, the report and recommendations of the Planning Commission to the Board of County Commissioners required in LDC section 10.02.08 E shall show that the Planning Commission has studied and considered the proposed change in relation to the following findings, when applicable: 1. Whether the proposed change will be consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies and future land use map and the elements of the Growth Management Plan. The proposed MPUD is consistent with the Immokalee Area Master Plan (IAMP). The property is located within both the High Residential Subdistrict and the 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 138 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) Page 5 of 8 Commerce Center-Mixed Use Subdistrict. The High Residential Subdistrict permits multi-family residential development at a maximum density of 8 dwelling units per acre. The proposed 160 dwelling units equates to a density of approximately 2.6 dwelling units per acre. The .66+/- acre commercial tract was excluded from the acreage utilized in the density calculation. The proposed residential density is well within the maximum permissible base density of 8 dwelling units per acre. The non-residential educational uses are also consistent with the IAMP. The IAMP permits uses such as public and private schools, day care centers, and recreational uses as permitted uses within all of the Residential land use designations in the IAMP. The two small commercial tracts are located within the Commerce Center- Mixed Use land use designation. This land use designation permits a variety of commercial land uses ranging from C-1 through C-4 levels of intensity. The MPUD permits C-3 commercial land uses which is consistent with this future land use category. Policy 1.1.3 requires coordination regarding the timing, intensity and design of development to insure that adequate public facilities are available to service the proposed land uses. The project is subject to concurrency and no facility inadequacies are present or anticipated. Policy 1.1.4 emphasizes land use transition between land uses. The proposed multi- family dwelling units are separated from the nearest residences to the northwest by a vegetative preserve and natural buffer providing a large building separation. The multi-family dwellings are separated from the nearest single-family residences to the south by a wetland preserve and Lake Trafford Road. The commercial tracts are located adjacent to existing C-3 zoned property which include an EMS station and convenience store; therefore, no transition is necessary. Policy 1.4.3 encourages pedestrian friendly design for projects located within the Immokalee Urban Area. The proposed mixed-use project will provide internal sidewalks and pathways to link the various educational, residential and open space areas within the project. Sidewalk connections will be provided to the sidewalk that currently exists within the Lake Trafford Road ROW. Objective 3.1 of the IAMP provides for the protection of natural resources within the Immokalee Urban Area. A majority of the property has been previously been cleared and utilized for cattle grazing. There are two vegetative areas on the property located near the southwest and southeast boundaries of the property adjacent to Lake Trafford Road. A complete environmental assessment has been prepared and is included in the MPUD application materials. The Land Development Code requires that mixed use project provide 25% preservation of the existing on-site native vegetation. The minimum preserve area that will be provided on-site will be 5.8 acres. The site also falls within the ST overlay for the 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 139 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) Page 6 of 8 wellfield protection zones. None of the proposed uses are prohibited within the protection zones and all development will be in compliance with Section 3.06 of the Land Development Code which establishes the standards for all development within the zones. 2. The existing land use pattern. Adjacent property to the north and south is developed with residential. To the east is a church, Immokalee Water/Sewer District utility site, convenience store, fire station and residential. To the west is Lake Trafford Elementary School and residential development. 3. The possible creation of an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts. Rezoning the property to a PUD does not create an isolated district. The property is of sufficient size to meet the criteria for a PUD rezoning. The PUD rezoning is logical as the property will be developed with a variety of non-residential and residential uses and development standards need to be identified. 4. Whether existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the property proposed for change. The existing Agricultural zoning does not permit the land uses proposed to be developed on the property. The rezoning is required in order to develop the proposed uses. 5. Whether changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed amendment necessary. RCMA has seen increased demand for private schooling in the Immokalee Community. The Lake Trafford Road site will allow RCMA to construct new state of the are educational facilities in a campus atmosphere, with ample room for school growth. 6. Whether the proposed change will adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood. The addition of 250-student childcare center, 700 student K-8 charter school, community center and a maximum of 160 multi-family residential dwelling units will not adversely affect living conditions in the area. Buffers will be provided per the LDC. 7. Whether the proposed change will create or excessively increase traffic congestion or create types of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses, because of 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 140 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) Page 7 of 8 peak volumes or projected types of vehicular traffic, including activity during construction phases of the development, or otherwise affect public safety. The traffic analysis prepared in support of the MPUD rezone demonstrates that Lake Trafford Road will continue to operate at acceptable levels of service. 8. Whether the proposed change will create a drainage problem. All proposed improvements will be required to be reviewed by the SFWMD as part of an environmental resource permit, which includes a review of the surface water management system to ensure compliance with approved discharge rates for this drainage basin. 9. Whether the proposed change will seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas. The changes will have no impact to light or air to adjacent areas. 10. Whether the proposed change will adversely affect property values in the adjacent area. The proposed change should have no impact on property values on adjacent property. 11. Whether the proposed change will be a deterrent to the improvement or development of adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations. The proposed addition of community facility, commercial and residential land uses at this location will not be a detriment to improvement or development of adjacent properties. 12. Whether the proposed change will constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual owner as contrasted with the public welfare. All property owners have the right to propose changes that are consistent with the Growth Management Plan. No special privileges are granted by this change. 13. Whether there are substantial reasons why the property cannot be used in accordance with existing zoning. The existing zoning does not permit the proposed variety of uses; therefore, a MPUD rezone is necessary. 14. Whether the change suggested is out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the county. 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 141 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) Page 8 of 8 The MPUD is in scale with the community needs and the buildings are arranged on- site to have large setbacks from neighboring properties. 15. Whether it is impossible to find other adequate sites in the county for the proposed use in districts already permitting such use. It is not impossible to find other adequate sites in Collier County for this MPUD; however, this part of Collier County is underserved with the uses proposed. 16. The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site alteration which would be required to make the property usable for any of the range of potential uses under the proposed zoning classification. There are no unique features of the property. Development will require site clearing and filling. Native vegetation retention and open space will be provided as required under the Growth Management Plan and LDC. 17. The impact of development on the availability of adequate public facilities and services consistent with the levels of service adopted in the Collier County Growth Management Plan and as defined and implemented through the Collier County Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance [Code ch. 106, art. II], as amended. There are no deficiencies anticipated with development of this use. 18. Such other factors, standards, or criteria that the Board of County Commissioners shall deem important in the protection of the public health, safety, and welfare. The MPUD contains development standards and commitments, which will insure the protection of the public health, safety and welfare. Water Management Narrative: The proposed stormwater management system will consist of a series of lakes and dry detention areas interconnected to provide attenuation and water quality treatment. The system will discharge to the Lake Trafford Rd swale on the southwest corner of the site. The discharge will be limited to the Immokalee West Urban discharge rate of 0.10 cfs/ac. Building finished floor elevations will be above the FEMA FIRM and 100 yr storm elevations. Parking aisles and perimeter berm will be above the 25 yr storm elevation. The project will construct a swale system along the north and west side of the site to convey any stormwater runoff from adjoining properties around the site to the Lake Trafford Rd swale. Properties to the east drain toward Carson Rd and no swale is needed along that side. 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 142 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 143 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 144 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 145 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 146 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 147 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 148 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 149 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 150 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 151 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 152 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 153 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 154 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 155 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 156 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 157 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 158 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 159 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) 9.A.1.ePacket Pg. 160Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 161 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 162 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 163 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 164 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 165 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 166 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) 9.A.1.ePacket Pg. 167Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) 9.A.1.ePacket Pg. 168Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 169 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Created 9/28/2017 Page 1 of 3 This is a required form with all land use petitions, except for Appeals and Zoning Verification Letters. Should any changes of ownership or changes in contracts for purchase occur subsequent to the date of application, but prior to the date of the final public hearing, it is the responsibility of the applicant, or agent on his behalf, to submit a supplemental disclosure of interest form. Please complete the following, use additional sheets if necessary. a. If the property is owned fee simple by an INDIVIDUAL, tenancy by the entirety, tenancy in common, or joint tenancy, list all parties with an ownership interest as well as the percentage of such interest: Name and Address % of Ownership N.A. b. If the property is owned by a CORPORATION, list the officers and stockholders and the percentage of stock owned by each: Name and Address % of Ownership N.A. c. If the property is in the name of a TRUSTEE, list the beneficiaries of the trust with the percentage of interest: Name and Address % of Ownership N.A. d. If the property is in the name of a GENERAL or LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, list the name of the general and/or limited partners: Name and Address % of Ownership Barron Collier Partnership LLLP 100% Barron Collier Management, LLC 1.0000% Juliet C. Sproul Family Inheritance Trust 24.7500% PROPERTY OWNERSHIP DISCLOSURE FORM 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 170 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Created 9/28/2017 Page 2 of 3 Barron G. Collier III Lifetime Irrevocable Trust 24.7500% Lamar Gable Lifetime Irrevocable Trust 12.3750% FGVLIRT – Christopher D. Villere Family 4.1250% FGVLIRT – Mathilde V. Currence Family 4.1250% FGVLIRT – Lamar G. Villere Family 4.1250% Phyllis G. Alden Lifetime Irrevocable Trust 12.3750% Donna G. Keller Lifetime Irrevocable Trust 12.3750% e. If there is a CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE, with an individual or individuals, a Corporation, Trustee, or a Partnership, list the names of the contract purchasers below, including the officers, stockholders, beneficiaries, or partners: Name and Address and Address % of Ownership Redlands Christian Migrant Association, Inc., a Florida Not for Profit Corporation (see attached Annual Report) 402 W Main St., Immokalee, FL 34142-39 100% Date of Contract: 5/20/20 f. If any contingency clause or contract terms involve additional parties, list all individuals or officers, if a corporation, partnership, or trust: Name and Address g. Date subject property acquired 1998 Leased: Term of lease years /months If, Petitioner has option to buy, indicate the following: Date of option: Date option terminates: , or 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 171 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Created 9/28/2017 Page 3 of 3 Anticipated closing date: Any petition required to have Property Ownership Disclosure, will not be accepted without this form. Requirements for petition types are located on the associated application form. Any change in ownership whether individually or with a Trustee, Company or other interest-holding party, must be disclosed to Collier County immediately if such change occurs prior to the petition’s final public hearing. As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is included in this submittal package. I understand that failure to include all necessary submittal information may result in the delay of processing this petition. The completed application, all required submittal materials, and fees shall be submitted to: Growth Management Department ATTN: Business Center 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 December 15, 2020 Agent/Owner Signature Date D. Wayne Arnold, AICP Agent/Owner Name (please print) AFFIRM PROPERTY OWNERSHIP INFORMATION 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 172 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) 9.A.1.ePacket Pg. 173Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 174 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 175 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 176 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 177 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 178 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 179 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 180 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 181 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 182 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 183 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 184 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 185 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 186 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 187 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 252-5724 ADDRESSING CHECKLIST Please complete the following and email to GMD_Addressing@colliergov.net or fax to the Operations Division at 239-252-5724 or submit in person to the Addressing Section at the above address. Form must be signed by Addressing personnel prior to pre-application meeting, please allow 3 days for processing. Not all items will apply to every project. Items in bold type are required. FOLIO NUMBERS MUST BE PROVIDED. Forms older than 6 months will require additional review and approval by the Addressing Section. PETITION TYPE (Indicate type below, complete a separate Addressing Checklist for each Petition type) BL (Blasting Permit) BD (Boat Dock Extension) Carnival/Circus Permit CU (Conditional Use) EXP (Excavation Permit) FP (Final Plat LLA (Lot Line Adjustment) PNC (Project Name Change) PPL (Plans & Plat Review) PSP (Preliminary Subdivision Plat) PUD Rezone RZ (Standard Rezone) SDP (Site Development Plan) SDPA (SDP Amendment) SDPI (Insubstantial Change to SDP) SIP (Site Im provement Plan) SIPI (Insubstantial Change to SIP) SNR (Street Name Change) SNC (Street Name Change – Unplatted) TDR (Transfer of Development Rights) VA (Variance) VRP (Vegetation Removal Permit) VRSFP (Vegetation Removal & Site Fill Permit) OTHER LEGAL DESCRIPT ION of subject property or properties (copy of lengthy description may be attached) FOLIO (Property ID) NUMBER(s) of above (attach to, or associate with, legal description if more than one) STREET ADDRESS or ADDRESSES (as applicable, if already assigned) PROPOSED STREET NAMES (if applicable) SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN NUMBER (for existing projects/sites only) LOCATION MAP must be attached showing exact location of project/site in relation to nearest public road right- of-way PROPOSED PROJECT NAME (if applicable) SDP - or AR or PL # SURVEY (copy - needed only for unplatted properties) CURRENT PROJECT NAME (if applicable) Rev. 6/9/2017 Page 1 of 2 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 188 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 252-5724 Please Return Approved Checklist By: Email Personally picked up Applicant Name: Signature on Addressing Checklist does not constitute Project and/or Street Name approval and is subject to further review by the Operations Division. FOR STAFF USE ONLY Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Approved by: Date: Updated by: Date: IF OLDER THAN 6 MONTHS, FORM MUST BE UPDATED OR NEW FORM SUBMITTED Fax Email/Fax:Phone: Project or development names proposed for, or already appearing in, condominium documents (if application; indicate whether proposed or existing) Rev. 6/9/2017 Page 2 of 2 00071960001 11/04/2020 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 189 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) / Collier County Proper ty AppraiserProperty Aerial Parcel No 00071960001 SiteAddress*Disclaimer Site City IMMOKALEE Site Zone*Note 34142 Open GIS in a New Window with More Features. 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 190 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 191 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 192 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 193 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 194 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 195 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 196 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 197 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 198 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 199 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 200 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 201 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 202 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 203 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 204 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 205 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 206 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 207 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 208 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 209 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 210 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 211 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 212 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 213 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 214 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 215 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 216 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 217 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 218 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 219 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 220 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 221 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 222 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) 9.A.1.ePacket Pg. 223Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) Carson RDWestclox ST Lake Trafford RD Lincoln BLVD Bush ST E Plum STN 29th STCur r y RD Bush ST WHamilton STArthur STLiberty WAYJackson CTPeace WAYEd en AVE Crestview DRImmokalee DRJustice CIRTrafford Isles CIREl Paso TRLMax DR Madison CTBoxwood DRL in c o ln C T Harvest DRRoy WAYAdams CTThomas LNG i n g e r L N Iro nwood LN Lincoln BLVDSource: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AeroGRID, IGN, and the GIS User Community RCMA Immokalee MPUD Subject Property . 800 0 800400 Feet 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 224 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) 3.08.00 Environmental Data Purpose As per requirements in LDC Sections 3.08.00 and questions in the CU Checklist Preparation Of Environmental Data Preparation of Environmental Data, Environmental Data Submittal Requirement shall be prepared by an individual with academic credentials and experience in the area of environmental science or natural resource management. Academic credentials and experience shall be a bachelor’s or higher degree in one of the biological sciences with at least two years of ecological or biological professional experience in the State of Florida Qualifications of Environmental Consultant Collier Environmental Consultants Inc. 2/96 - Present 3211 68th Street SW Naples, Florida 34105 Marco A. Espinar- Biologist Environmental Data. The following shall be submitted where applicable to evaluate projects. A) Wetlands i) Identify on Current Aerial / the location of all Collier County / SFWMD Jurisdictional wetlands according to the Florida Land Use Cover and Forms Classification System FLUCFCS RCMA Child Development Center and Community Hub is in Immokalee, Florida. The parcel is in Collier County Section 31, Township 46, Range 29. This project consists of approximately 62.2 acres. The project is located on Lake Trafford Road and east of CR 29. The project site consists mostly of pasture lands with some Slash pine uplands and two wetland areas. This project is currently being utilized a a cow/calf cattle operation. This project site is bordered by Lake Trafford Road to the south, Lake Trafford Elementary School to the west, Carson Road to the east and Curry Road to the north. This parcel is considered in the urban area of Immokalee. An exhibit depicting each FLUCCS Code with acreage has been provided 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 225 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) B) Listed Species and Bald Eagle Nests and Nest Protection Zones i) Provide a wildlife survey for the nests of bald eagle and for listed species known to inhabit biological communities similar to those existing on site. The survey shall be conducted in accordance with the guidelines or recommendations of the FFWCC and the USFWS. Survey times may be reduced or waived where an initial habitat assessment by the environmental consultant indicates that the likelihood of listed species occurrence is low as determined by the FFWCC and USFWS. Where an initial habitat assessment by the environmental consultant indicates that the likelihood of listed species occurrence is low, the survey time may be reduced or waived by the County Manager or designee. Wildlife Listed Species Study (LDC10.02.3.A.2.m) A brief examination of the parcel found no listed animals on site. However, Black bears are known to inhabit these areas. The site does provide some functional habitat for small, medium mammals and birds. A listed species study was conducted and attached. This project site is not in a panther consultation zone. During the Environmental Resource Permit process this project will be reviewed by the appropriate regulatory agencies. This project meets the Objective of CCME Objective 7.1. All proposed impacts are being directed towards the already cleared pasture areas. The majority of the areas that still have native habitat are proposed as preserve. CCME OBJECTIVE 7.1: Direct incompatible land uses away from listed animal species and their habitats. (The County relies on the listing process of State and Federal agencies to identify species that require special protection because of their endangered, threatened, or species of special concern status. Listed animal species are those species that the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission has designated as endangered, threatened, or species of special concern, in accordance with Rules 68A-27.003, 68A- 27.004, and 68A-27.005, F.A.C. and those species designated by various federal agencies as Endangered and Threatened species published in 50 CFR 17.) ii) Provide Listed Plants identified in LDC Section 3.04.03 See Attached Vegetation List / FLUCCS Code Map 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 226 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) iii) Wildlife Management Plans in accordance with LDC Section 3.04.00 See Attached Listed Species Study, any required wildlife management plans may be required at the time of SDP. C) Native Vegetation Preservation i) For Sites or Portions of Sites Cleared of Native Vegetation or in Agricultural Use: Not Applicable ii) Identify on a current aerial the acreage, location and community types of all upland and wetland habitats on the project site, according to the FLUCFCS system and provide a legend foe each of the FLUCFS codes identified. Aerials and overlay information must be legible at the scale provided. Provide calculations for the acreage of native vegetation required to be retained on site. Include the above referenced calculations and aerials on the SDP or PPL. In a separate report, demonstrate how the preserve criteria pursuant to LDC section 3.05.07 have been meet. Location Maps / Aerials (LDC10.02.3.A.2.m) Aerials and location maps have been provided. RCMA Child Development Center and Community Hub is in Immokalee, Florida. The parcel is in Collier County Section 31, Township 46, Range 29. This project consists of approximately 62.2 acres. The project is located on Lake Trafford Road and east of CR 29. The project site consists mostly of pasture lands with some Slash pine uplands and two wetland areas. This project is currently being utilized a a cow/calf cattle operation. This project site is bordered by Lake Trafford Road to the south, Lake Trafford Elementary School to the west, Carson Road to the east and Curry Road to the north. This parcel is considered in the urban area of Immokalee. See Attached Location Maps, Vegetation Maps / FLUCCS Maps Native Vegetation Calculation (LDC3.05.07.A.) 3.05.07 Preservation Standards The entire site consists of approximately 62.2 acres of which approximately 20.6 acres would be considered Native Habitat. The project is required to preserve 25 % and /or approximately 5.15 acres will be 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 227 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) required. The current site plan shows 5.15 acres will be provided. This will be consistent with Goal 6 of Collier County GMP’s Objective 6.1 Protect native communities through the application of minimum preservation requirements. Clearly identify the location of all preserves The preserve area has been identified on the site plan. Soil Ground Water Sampling Soil Boring will be conducted at the time at SDP as per LDC 3.08.00 A. 4. d (ii) An exhibit showing Collier County well field protection zones has been provided. 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 228 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 229 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 230 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 231 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 232 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 233 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) 9.A.1.ePacket Pg. 234Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee 9.A.1.ePacket Pg. 235Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee 9.A.1.ePacket Pg. 236Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee 9.A.1.ePacket Pg. 237Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 238 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 239 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 240 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 241 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 242 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 243 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 244 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 245 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 246 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 247 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 248 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 249 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) 9.A.1.ePacket Pg. 250Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee 9.A.1.ePacket Pg. 251Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 252 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 253 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 254 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 255 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) 9.A.1.ePacket Pg. 256Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 257 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 258 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) 9.A.1.ePacket Pg. 259Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee 9.A.1.ePacket Pg. 260Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee 9.A.1.ePacket Pg. 261Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 262 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) R C ZONED: MH USE: RESIDENTIAL ZONED: P USE: UTILITY SITE AND CHURCH ZONED: A USE: EMS/FIRE STATION #31 ZONED: C-3 USE: CONVENIENCE STORE ZONED: ARROWHEAD MPUD USE: UNDEVELOPED COMMERCIAL TRACT ZONED: VR USE: UNDEVELOPED ZONED: AUSE: LAKE TRAFFORD ELEMENTARY SCHOOLZONED: LIBERTY LANDING RPUDUSE: RESIDENTIALZONED: ARROWHEAD MPUD USE: PARTIALLY DEVELOPED RESIDENTIAL ZONED: VR USE: UNDEVELOPED ZONED: VR USE: RESIDENTIAL 20' WIDE TYPE 'D' LANDSCAPE BUFFER 20' WIDE TYPE 'D' LANDSCAPE BUFFER MINIMUM 6-FOOT WIDE LANDSCAPE BUFFER RESERVATION (SEE NOTE #2) 20' WIDE TYPE 'D' LANDSCAPE BUFFER 15' WIDE TYPE 'B' LANDSCAPE BUFFER15' WIDE TYPE 'B' LANDSCAPE BUFFER15' WIDE TYPE 'B' LANDSCAPE BUFFER 15' WIDE TYPE 'B' LANDSCAPE BUFFER 1 20' WIDE TYPE 'D' LANDSCAPE BUFFER 10' WIDE TYPE 'A' LANDSCAPE BUFFER 15' WIDE TYPE 'B' LANDSCAPE BUFFER PRESERVE CHILD CARE WATER MANAGEMENT WATER MANAGEMENT PAVED PARKING AND DRIVE AISLES GRASS PARKING PEDESTRIAN / VEHICULAR INTERCONNECT WATER MANAGEMENT / OPEN SPACE / RECREATION AREA WATER MANAGEMENT / OPEN SPACE / RECREATION AREA WATER MANAGEMENT / OPEN SPACE / RECREATION AREA CF CHARTER SCHOOL 1CF 1CF 1CF EVENT LAWN EVENT LAWN OUTFALL LOCATION (APPROXIMATE) 2 2 AA 2 2 15' WIDE TYPE 'B' LANDSCAPE BUFFER 2 GradyMinor Civil Engineers ●Land Surveyors ●Planners ●Landscape Architects Cert. of Auth. EB 0005151 Cert. of Auth. LB 0005151 Business LC 26000266 Q. Grady Minor and Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey Bonita Springs, Florida 34134 Bonita Springs: 239.947.1144 ZZZ.GradyMinor.coP Fort Myers: 239.690.4380 0 300'150' # DEVIATION AA AMENITY AREA R RESIDENTIAL C COMMERCIAL CF COMMUNITY FACILITY 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 263 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 264 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 265 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) 9.A.1.ePacket Pg. 266Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 267 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 268 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) 9.A.1.ePacket Pg. 269Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee 9.A.1.ePacket Pg. 270Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 271 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 272 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) 9.A.1.ePacket Pg. 273Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 274 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 275 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) DocuSign Envelope ID: 2C0E14A8-91AA-4FE2-A6AA-B9449B5CF702 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 276 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) DocuSign Envelope ID: 2C0E14A8-91AA-4FE2-A6AA-B9449B5CF702 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 277 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) DocuSign Envelope ID: 2C0E14A8-91AA-4FE2-A6AA-B9449B5CF702 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 278 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) DocuSign Envelope ID: 2C0E14A8-91AA-4FE2-A6AA-B9449B5CF702 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 279 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) DocuSign Envelope ID: 2C0E14A8-91AA-4FE2-A6AA-B9449B5CF702 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 280 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) DocuSign Envelope ID: 2C0E14A8-91AA-4FE2-A6AA-B9449B5CF7029.A.1.ePacket Pg. 281Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee DocuSign Envelope ID: 2C0E14A8-91AA-4FE2-A6AA-B9449B5CF702 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 282 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) DocuSign Envelope ID: 2C0E14A8-91AA-4FE2-A6AA-B9449B5CF702 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 283 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) DocuSign Envelope ID: 2C0E14A8-91AA-4FE2-A6AA-B9449B5CF702 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 284 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) DocuSign Envelope ID: 2C0E14A8-91AA-4FE2-A6AA-B9449B5CF702 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 285 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) DocuSign Envelope ID: 2C0E14A8-91AA-4FE2-A6AA-B9449B5CF7029.A.1.ePacket Pg. 286Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee DocuSign Envelope ID: 2C0E14A8-91AA-4FE2-A6AA-B9449B5CF702 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 287 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) DocuSign Envelope ID: 2C0E14A8-91AA-4FE2-A6AA-B9449B5CF7029.A.1.ePacket Pg. 288Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee DocuSign Envelope ID: 2C0E14A8-91AA-4FE2-A6AA-B9449B5CF7029.A.1.ePacket Pg. 289Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee DocuSign Envelope ID: 2C0E14A8-91AA-4FE2-A6AA-B9449B5CF702 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 290 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) DocuSign Envelope ID: 2C0E14A8-91AA-4FE2-A6AA-B9449B5CF702 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 291 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) DocuSign Envelope ID: 2C0E14A8-91AA-4FE2-A6AA-B9449B5CF702 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 292 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) DocuSign Envelope ID: 2C0E14A8-91AA-4FE2-A6AA-B9449B5CF702 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 293 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) DocuSign Envelope ID: 2C0E14A8-91AA-4FE2-A6AA-B9449B5CF702 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 294 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) DocuSign Envelope ID: 2C0E14A8-91AA-4FE2-A6AA-B9449B5CF702 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 295 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) DocuSign Envelope ID: 2C0E14A8-91AA-4FE2-A6AA-B9449B5CF7029.A.1.ePacket Pg. 296Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee DocuSign Envelope ID: 2C0E14A8-91AA-4FE2-A6AA-B9449B5CF702 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 297 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) DocuSign Envelope ID: 2C0E14A8-91AA-4FE2-A6AA-B9449B5CF702 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 298 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) DocuSign Envelope ID: 2C0E14A8-91AA-4FE2-A6AA-B9449B5CF7029.A.1.ePacket Pg. 299Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee DocuSign Envelope ID: 2C0E14A8-91AA-4FE2-A6AA-B9449B5CF7029.A.1.ePacket Pg. 300Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee DocuSign Envelope ID: 2C0E14A8-91AA-4FE2-A6AA-B9449B5CF7029.A.1.ePacket Pg. 301Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee Historic Preservation/Forms/rev. 06/05/08 1 COLLIER COUNTY WAIVER APPLICATION FROM THE REQUIRED HISTORICAL AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY AND ASSESSMENT DATE SUBMITTED: _______________ PLANNER: PETITION NUMBER ASSOCIATED WITH THE WAIVER: PL20200001827 (To Be Completed By Zoning and Land Development Review Staff) PROJECT NAME: RCMA Immokalee MPUD LOCATION: (Common Description) The subject property is located on the northwest quadrant of Trafford Lake Road and Carson Road.__________________________ SUMMARY OF WAIVER REQUEST: The proposed MPUD site is 63± acres and is currently undeveloped. The property has historically been used for agricultural purposes. The Archaeological Probability Map #13 shows the project is not located in an area that indicates areas of Historical/Archaeological probability or known sites. The project is located in Section 31, Township 46 S, Range 29 E on the north side of Lake Trafford Road. (Properties located within an area of Historical and Archaeological Probability but with a low potential for historical/archaeological sites may petition the Community Development & Environmental Services Administrator County Manager or designee to waive the requirement for a Historical/Archaeological Survey and Assessment. Once the waiver application has been submitted, it shall be reviewed and acted upon within five (5) working days. The waiver request shall adequately demonstrate that the area has low potential for historical/archaeological sites.) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 302 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) Historic Preservation/Forms/rev. 06/05/08 2 SECTION ONE: APPLICANT AND PROPERTY OWNERSHIP DATA A. Name of applicant (s) (if other than property owner, state relationship such as option holder, contract purchaser, lessee, trustee, etc.): Redlands Christian Migrant Association, Inc., Contract Purchaser Mailing Address: 402 W. Main Street, Immokalee FL 34112 Phone: FAX: _______________________ E-Mail: mike@hfarchitects.net B. Name of agent(s) for applicant, if any: D. Wayne Arnold, AICP Mailing Address: Q. Grady Minor and Associates, P.A., 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, Florida 34134 Phone: 239.947.1144 FAX: 239.947.0375 E-Mail: warnold@gradyminor.com C. Name of owner(s) of property: Barron Collier Partnership LLLP Mailing Address: 2600 Golden Gate Parkway, Naples FL 34104 Phone: 239-262-2600 FAX: _______________________ E-Mail: DGenson@barroncollier.com Note: If names in answers to A and/or B are different than name in C, notarized letter(s) of authorization from property owner (C) must be attached. SECTION TWO: SUBJECT PROPERTY DATA (Attach copy of the plat book page (obtainable from Clerk’s Office at the original scale) with subject property clearly marked.) A. Legal description of subject property. Answer only 1 or 2, as applicable. 1. Within platted subdivision, recorded in official Plat Books of Collier County. Subdivision Name: N.A. Plat Book N.A. Page N.A. Unit N.A. Tract N.A. Lot N.A. Section 31 Township 46S Range 29 E 2. If not in platted subdivision, a complete legal description must be attached which is sufficiently detailed so as to locate said property on County maps or aerial 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 303 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) Historic Preservation/Forms/rev. 06/05/08 3 photographs. The legal description must include the Section, Township and Range. If the applicant includes multiple contiguous parcels, the legal description may describe the perimeter boundary of the total area, and need not describe each individual parcel, except where different zoning requests are made on individual parcels. A boundary sketch is also required. Collier County has the right to reject any legal description, which is not sufficiently detailed so as to locate said property, and may require a certified survey or boundary sketch to be submitted. B. Property dimensions: Area: 2,744,280 square feet, or 63± acres Width along roadway: 2,291± feet (4th St. N.E.) and 2,670± feet (Immokalee Road) Depth: 1360± feet C. Present use of property: Undeveloped agricultural land D. Present zoning classification: A (ST/W-1 through ST/W-4) SECTION THREE: WAIVER CRITERIA Note: This provision is to cover instances in which it is obvious that any archaeological or historic resource that may have existed has been destroyed. Examples would be evidence that a major building has been constructed on the site or that an area has been excavated. A. Waiver Request Justification. 1. Interpretation of Aerial Photograph Photo shows property undeveloped and portions cleared for agricultural use. 2. Historical Land Use Description: Undeveloped agricultural. 3. Land, cover, formation and vegetation description: The parcel contains vegetation on the western side of the property and in the southeast corner, the remainder of the property is sporadically vegetated. 4. Other: . B. The County Manager or designee may deny a waiver, grant the waiver, or grant the waiver with conditions. He shall be authorized to require examination of the site by an accredited archaeologist where deemed appropriate. The applicant shall bear the cost of such evaluation by an independent accredited archaeologist. The decision of the County Manager or designee regarding the waiver request shall be provided to the applicant in writing. In the event of a denial of the waiver request, written notice shall be provided stating the reasons for such denial. Any party aggrieved by a decision of 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 304 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) Historic Preservation/Forms/rev. 06/05/08 4 the County Manager or designee regarding a waiver request may appeal to the Preservation Board. Any party aggrieved by a decision of the Preservation Board regarding a waiver request may appeal that decision to the Board of County Commissioners. SECTION FOUR: CERTIFICATION A. The applicant shall be responsible for the accuracy and completeness of this application. Any time delays or additional expenses necessitated due to the submittal of inaccurate or incomplete information shall be the responsibility of the applicant. B. All information submitted with the application becomes a part of the public record and shall be a permanent part of the file. C. All attachments and exhibits submitted shall be of a size that will fit or conveniently fold to fit into a legal size (8 ½” x 14”) folder. ______________________________ Signature of Applicant or Agent D. Wayne Arnold, AICP Printed Name of Applicant or Agent ===================================================================== -TO BE COMPLETED BY THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIVISION- SECTION FIVE: NOTICE OF DECISION The County Manager or designee has made the following determination: Approved on: _____________ By:______________________________ Approved with Conditions on: ____________ By: _____________________________ (see attached) Denied on: _______________ By: ______________________________ (see attached) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 305 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) Historic Preservation/Forms/rev. 06/05/08 5 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 306 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) Historic Preservation/Forms/rev. 06/05/08 6 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 307 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) Carson RDWestclox ST Lake Trafford RD Lincoln BLVD Bush ST E Plum STN 29th STCur r y RD Bush ST WHamilton STArthur STLiberty WAYJackson CTPeace WAYEd en AVE Crestview DRImmokalee DRJustice CIRTrafford Isles CIREl Paso TRLMax DR Madison CTBoxwood DRL in c o ln C T Harvest DRRoy WAYAdams CTThomas LNG i n g e r L N Iro nwood LN Lincoln BLVDSource: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AeroGRID, IGN, and the GIS User Community RCMA Immokalee MPUD Subject Property . 800 0 800400 Feet 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 308 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) Collier County School District School Impact Analysis Application Instructions: Submit one copy of completed application and location map for each new residential project requiring a determination of school impact to the Planning Department of the applicable local government. This application will not be deemed complete until all applicable submittal requirements have been submitted. Please be advised that additional documentation/information may be requested during the review process. For information regarding this application process, please contact the Facilities Management Department at 239-377-0267. Please check [¥] type of application request (one only): [ ] School Capacity Review [ ] Exemption Letter [ ] Concurrency Determination [ ] Concurrency Determination Amendment For descriptions of the types of review please see page 3, _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ I. Project Information: Project Name: ___________________________________________ Municipality: _________________________________ Parcel ID#: (attach separate sheet for multiple parcels): _______________________________________________________ Location/Address of subject property: ____________________________________________________ (Attach location map) Closest Major Intersection: _______________________________________________________________________________ II. Ownership/Agent Information: Owner/Contract Purchaser Name(s): _____________________________________________________________________ Agent/Contact Person: ________________________________________________________________________________ (Please note that if agent or contact information is completed the District will forward all information to that person) Mailing address: _____________________________________________________________________________________ Telephone#: _____________________________ Fax: _________________________Email_________________________ I hereby certify the statements and/or information contained in this application with any attachments submitted herewith are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. _____________________________________________________ _____________________________ Owner or Authorized Agent Signature Date _________________________________________________________________________________________ III. Development Information Project Data (Unit Types defined on page 2 of application) Current Land Use Designation: Proposed Land Use Designation: Current Zoning: Proposed Zoning: Project Acreage: Unit Type: SF MF MH C G Total Units Currently Allowed by Type: Total Units Proposed by Type: Is this a phased project: Yes or No If yes, please complete page 2 of this application. Date/time stamp:___________________________ herewith are true and correct ______________________________ RCMA Immokalee MPUD Collier County 00071960001 Lake Trafford Road Lake Trafford Road and Carson Road Redlands Christian Migrant Association, Inc. D. Wayne Arnold, AICP Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A., 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, FL 34134 239-947-1144 warnold@gradyminor.com November 18, 2020 Agricultural Commercial, Charter School, Residential A, Agricultural RCMA Immokalee MPUD 0 160 ✔ 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 309 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) Worksheet is required to be completed by the Applicant only if the project is to be phased:Unit Type Yr1 Yr2 Yr3 Yr4 Yr5 Yr6 Yr7 Yr8 Yr9 Yr10 Yr 11-20 20+ YearsSFMFMHCGTotals by YrGrand TotalGrand TotalInsert totals by unit type by years.Unit Types:SF = Single FamilyMF = Multi-Family/Apartments MH = Mobile HomesC = Condo/Co-OpG = GovernmentEXAMPLE:Unit Type Yr1 Yr2 Yr3 Yr4 Yr5 Yr6 Yr7 Yr8 Yr9 Yr10 Yr 11-20 20+ YearsSF 25 25 25 25 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --MF 50 0 0 0 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --MH N/ACN/AGN/ATotals by Yr75 25 25 25 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --Grand Total 150.29.A.1.ePacket Pg. 310Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee Types of Reviews: School Impact Analysis: This review should be divided into two categories: -School Capacity Review (land use and rezonings), and; -Concurrency Determinations (site plans and subdivisions). School Capacity Review is the review of a project in the land use and rezoning stage of development. It is a review of the impact of the development on school capacity and is considered long range planning. This may be a review resulting in mitigation being required. In situations where the applicant may be required to mitigate, capacity may be reserved dependent on the type of mitigation. Concurrency Determination is the review of residential site plans and subdivisions to determine whether there is available capacity. When capacity is determined to be available a School Capacity Determination Letter (SCADL) will be issued verifying available capacity to the applicant and the local government. If a project exceeds the adopted level of service standards, the applicant is afforded the option of a negotiation period that may or may not result in an executed/recorded mitigation agreement Mitigation at this stage is expressed as a Proportionate Share Mitigation Agreement. For those residential developments that may have an impact but are otherwise exempt from concurrency, an exemption letter will be prepared for the applicant upon request. For those residential developments that are determined to not have an impact, a letter of no impact will be prepared for the applicant upon request. Exemption Letter: An applicant may request an Exemption Letter as documentation for the local government. These are projects that would be exempt from school concurrency review or projects that do not impact the public schools. Exemptions from school concurrency are limited to existing single family or mobile home lots of record; amendments to previously approved site plans or plats that do not increase the number of dwelling units or change the dwelling unit type; age restricted communities with no permanent residents under the age of 18; or residential site plans or plats or amendments to site plans or plats that generate less than one student; or are authorized as a Development of Regional Impact (Chapter 380, F.S.) as of July 1, 2005. Concurrency Determination Amendment: An applicant may request an amendment to a previously issued School Concurrency Determination or to an application being processed. This review may require additional staff time beyond the initial concurrency determination review and results in a modified determination being issued. An amendment could result in a negotiation period and/or a mitigation agreement being issued or a previously approved determination being modified and reissued. 3 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 311 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) Carson RDWestclox ST Lake Trafford RD Lin c o ln B L V D Bush ST E Plum STN 29th STCurry RD Bush ST WHamilton STArthur STLiberty WAYJackson CTPeace WAYEden AVE Crestview DRImmokalee DRJustice CIRTrafford Isles CIREl Paso TRLMax DR Madison CTBoxwood DRLin co ln CT Harvest DRRoy WAYAdams CTThomas LNG i nger LN Ironwood LN Lincoln BLVDSource: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AeroGRID, IGN, and the GIS User Community RCMA Immokalee MPUD Subject Property . 800 0 800400 Feet 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 312 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) RCMA Immokalee MPUD (PL20200001827) Deviation Justification July 1, 2021 Page 1 of 1 RCMALT Deviation Justification-r3.docx Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, FL 34134  239-947-1144  engineering@gradyminor.com  www.gradyminor.com 1. Deviation #1 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.03.02 G.1.a., “Supplemental Standards”, which requires chain link (including wire mesh) and wood fences are prohibited forward of the primary façade and shall be a minimum of 100 feet from a public right-of-way. If these types of fences face a public or private street, then they shall be screened with an irrigated hedge planted directly in front of the fence on the street side. Plant material shall be a minimum of 3 gallons in size and planted no more than 3 feet on center at time of installation. This plant material must be maintained at no less than three- quarters of the height of the adjacent fence, to instead allow the use of up to a 6-foot-high chain link fence forward of the primary façade where the chain link fence is screened with an irrigated hedge planting at a minimum of 3 gallons in size and planted no more than 3 feet on center at time of installation directly in front of the fence facing the external right-of-way. Justification: The proposed chain link fencing is proposed to be used to provide needed security for the school campus component of the MPUD. The deviation is consistent with other fences that have been constructed in Collier County for security. 2. Deviation #2 seeks relief from LDC Section 4.06.02, “Table 2.4 Table of Buffer Requirements by Land Use Classifications”, which provides that where multiple family dwellings are adjacent to a community facility (CF) use a 15-foot-wide Type B Buffer is required for both uses, to instead allow for a single 15- foot-wide Type B Buffer to be installed on the residential tract and will be installed at the time of construction of the residential component of the mixed-use PUD. Justification: The project is a unified Mixed Use Planned Unit Development. Although the residential component of the PUD may not be developed by RCMA, it will be developed in a cooperative manner with the intent to have the residential integrated into the school and charter school portion of the PUD. Two 15-foot-wide Type B Buffers is excessive given the cooperative nature of the two uses. Until the residential component is developed no buffer is necessary on the CF Tract due to the significant distance from the adjacent property to the west which is Lake Trafford Elementary School and its preserve area. 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 313 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 314 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 315 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 316 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 317 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 318 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 319 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 320 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 321 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 322 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, USGS, Intermap, INCREMENT P, NRCan, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri Korea, Esri (Thailand), NGCC, (c) OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community RCMA Immokalee MPUD Public Facilities Subject Property . 3,000 0 3,0001,500 Feet Legend <all other values> Aquatic Park Beach Park Boat Park Community Park Fitness Center Little League Fields Neighborhood Park Preserve Park Regional Park School Park Skate and BMX Parks State Park Schools Fire Station Office Maintenance Public Safety Office EMSMedical Office Police Substation County Jail City Jail 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 323 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 324 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. Ph. 239-947-1144 Fax. 239-947-0375 3800 Via Del Rey EB 0005151 LB 0005151 LC 26000266 Bonita Springs, FL 34134 www.gradyminor.com Project Location Map NOTICE OF NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING Petition PL20200001827, RCMA Immokalee MPUD Rezone (PUDZ) A Neighborhood Information Meeting hosted by D. Wayne Arnold, AICP, of Q. Grady Minor and Associates, P.A., representing Redlands Christian Migrant Association, Inc. (Applicant) will be held on March 30, 2021, 6:00 pm at the Immokalee Charter School, 123 N. 4th Street, Immokalee, FL 34142. Individuals who would like to participate remotely or have questions or comments should contact Sharon Umpenhour, Senior Planning Technician with Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. by email: sumpenhour@gradyminor.com, phone: 239-947-1144, or mail: 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, FL 34134. Project information is posted online at www.gradyminor.com/planning. Redlands Christian Migrant Association, Inc. submitted a formal application to Collier County, seeking approval of a Mixed Use Planned Unit Development (MPUD) Rezone. The MPUD rezone proposes to rezone the property from the Agricultural (A) Zoning District with a Wellfield Risk Management Special Treatment Overlay Zone W-1 through W-4 (ST/W-1 thru ST/W-4) to the RCMA Immokalee MPUD Zoning District to allow a 700 student K-8 Charter School, a 250-student pre-school, 160 multi-family dwelling units, which may include market rate, essential service and/or affordable housing units, and 5,000 square feet of Intermediate Commercial (C-3) uses and associated accessory uses. Access to the educational campus and housing will be from Lake Trafford Road, with a separate access to Carson Road to serve the small commercially designated tract. The subject property is comprised of 62.2± acres, located on the northwest corner of Lake Trafford Road and Carson Road Section 31, Township 46 South, Range 29 East, Collier County, Florida. The Neighborhood Information Meeting is for informational purposes only, it is not a public hearing. 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 325 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) 1FOLIO NAME1 NAME2 NAME3 NAME4 NAME5 NAME6 LEGAL1 LEGAL2 LEGAL3 LEGAL4 ADDRESSTYPE22430008508 1182 BUSH ST TRUST 720 GOODLETTE RD N #304NAPLES, FL 34102---0 ARROWHEAD RESERVE AT LAKE TRAFFORD PHASE ONE BLK A LOT 12 U76850000925 2735 EDEN AVE TRUST 720 GOODLETTE RD N #304NAPLES, FL 34102---0 TIMBER RIDGE UNIT ONE LOT 19U22430009688 ABURTO, MARICELA 1223 MADISON CTIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---2624 ARROWHEAD RESERVE AT LAKE TRAFFORD PHASE ONE BLK A LOT 71 U55649002647 ACEVEDO, ANTONIO MARTINEZ MARIA S HERNANDEZ DE MARTINEZ 3719 JUSTICE CIRIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---2323 LIBERTY LANDING LOT 120U55649000380 ACHILLE, CLAIRICIA 3544 LIBERTY WAYIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---2329 LIBERTY LANDING LOT 7U22430009989 ADDISON, GERALDINE J 1290 ADAMS CTIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---2626 ARROWHEAD RESERVE AT LAKE TRAFFORD PHASE ONE BLK A LOT 86 U00073360007 ALONSO, YATZIRI JESUS CARLOS MILIAN ALVARADO 1313 CARSON RDNAPLES, FL 34142---0 31 46 29 W 125FT OF N1/2 OF SE1/4 OF NE1/4 OF NE1/4, LESS N 165FTU22430009442 ALTIDOR, JANINE JASMINE ROCK 1232 MADISON CTIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---2624 ARROWHEAD RESERVE AT LAKE TRAFFORD PHASE ONE BLK A LOT 59 U00081480005 ALVIAR JR, FIDEL & ESPERANZA 519 ADAMS AVE WIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---2931 32 46 29 N 320FT OF S 960FT OF W1/2 OF W1/2 OF W1/2 OF NW1/4 OF SW1/4 1.21 AC OR 1134 PG 1707 U00073360405 AMERI-SCAPE OF SW FLORIDA INC 9200 BONITA BEACH RD #211BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34135---0 31 46 29 BEG AT NW CNR OF NE 1/4 OF SEC 31, E 800FT, S 270 FT TO POB, E 196FT, S 170FT, W 196FT, N 170FT TO POB U55649001127 ANOFILS, PABILIEE 3700 JUSTICE CIRIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---2323 LIBERTY LANDING LOT 44U69060000641 ANTOINE, JEAN WILNER 1315 REFLECTIONS WAY UNIT 8IMMOKALEE, FL 34142---2261 REFLECTIONS AT JUBILATION A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 53 UNIT 8U55649000827 ANTOINE, REBECCA 3636 JUSTICE CIRIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---2315 LIBERTY LANDING LOT 29U22430003082 ARROOWHEAD RESERVE AT LAKE TRAFFORD POA, INC 7742 ALICO RDFORT MYERS, FL 33912---0 ARROWHEAD RESERVE AT LAKE TRAFFORD PHASE ONE TRACT O-4U22430010622 ARROWHEAD 229 LLC 7742 ALICO RDFT MYERS, FL 33912---0 ARROWHEAD RESERVE AT LAKE TRAFFORD PHASE TWO BLK D LOT 1 U22430010648 ARROWHEAD 229 LLC 7742 ALICO RDFT MYERS, FL 33912---0 ARROWHEAD RESERVE AT LAKE TRAFFORD PHASE TWO BLK D LOT 2 U22430010664 ARROWHEAD 229 LLC 7742 ALICO RDFT MYERS, FL 33912---0 ARROWHEAD RESERVE AT LAKE TRAFFORD PHASE TWO BLK D LOT 3 U22430010680 ARROWHEAD 229 LLC 7742 ALICO RDFT MYERS, FL 33912---0 ARROWHEAD RESERVE AT LAKE TRAFFORD PHASE TWO BLK D LOT 4 U22430010703 ARROWHEAD 229 LLC 7742 ALICO RDFT MYERS, FL 33912---0 ARROWHEAD RESERVE AT LAKE TRAFFORD PHASE TWO BLK D LOT 5 U22430012549 ARROWHEAD 229 LLC 7742 ALICO RDFT MYERS, FL 33912---0 ARROWHEAD RESERVE AT LAKE TRAFFORD PHASE TWO BLK D LOT 97 U22430012565 ARROWHEAD 229 LLC 7742 ALICO RDFT MYERS, FL 33912---0 ARROWHEAD RESERVE AT LAKE TRAFFORD PHASE TWO BLK D LOT 98 U22430012581 ARROWHEAD 229 LLC 7742 ALICO RDFT MYERS, FL 33912---0 ARROWHEAD RESERVE AT LAKE TRAFFORD PHASE TWO BLK D LOT 99 U22430012604 ARROWHEAD 229 LLC 7742 ALICO RDFT MYERS, FL 33912---0 ARROWHEAD RESERVE AT LAKE TRAFFORD PHASE TWO BLK D LOT 100 U22430012620 ARROWHEAD 229 LLC 7742 ALICO RDFT MYERS, FL 33912---0 ARROWHEAD RESERVE AT LAKE TRAFFORD PHASE TWO BLK D LOT 101 U22430012646 ARROWHEAD 229 LLC 7742 ALICO RDFT MYERS, FL 33912---0 ARROWHEAD RESERVE AT LAKE TRAFFORD PHASE TWO BLK D LOT 102 U69060000340 ARROWHEAD INVESTMENTS OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA LLC 321 W MAIN STIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---0 REFLECTIONS AT JUBILATION A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 52 UNIT 1U22430000027 ARROWHEAD LAND LLC 321 W MAIN STIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---3930 ARROWHEAD RESERVE AT LAKE TRAFFORD PHASE ONE TRACT 1, LESS THAT PART NKA TOWNHOMES I AT TRAFFORD ISLE U22430010525 ARROWHEAD RESERVE AT LAKE TRAFFORD POA 2180 IMMOKALEE RD STE 309 NAPLES, FL 34110---0 ARROWHEAD RESERVE AT LAKE TRAFFORD PHASE TWO TRACT O-5U22430003066 ARROWHEAD RESERVE AT LAKE TRAFFORD POA, INC 7742 ALICO RDFORT MYERS, FL 33912---0 ARROWHEAD RESERVE AT LAKE TRAFFORD PHASE ONE TRACT O-3U22430003147 ARROWHEAD RESERVE AT LAKE TRAFFORD POA, INC 7742 ALICO RDFORT MYERS, FL 33912---0 ARROWHEAD RESERVE AT LAKE TRAFFORD PHASE ONE TRACT P-3U22430003163 ARROWHEAD RESERVE AT LAKE TRAFFORD POA, INC 7742 ALICO RDFORT MYERS, FL 33912---0 ARROWHEAD RESERVE AT LAKE TRAFFORD PHASE ONE TRACT P-4U22430003189 ARROWHEAD RESERVE AT LAKE TRAFFORD POA, INC 7742 ALICO RDFORT MYERS, FL 33912---0 ARROWHEAD RESERVE AT LAKE TRAFFORD PHASE ONE TRACT P-5U22430003244 ARROWHEAD RESERVE AT LAKE TRAFFORD POA, INC 7742 ALICO RDFORT MYERS, FL 33912---0 ARROWHEAD RESERVE AT LAKE TRAFFORD PHASE ONE TRACT R-3U22430003260 ARROWHEAD RESERVE AT LAKE TRAFFORD POA, INC 7742 ALICO RDFORT MYERS, FL 33912---0 ARROWHEAD RESERVE AT LAKE TRAFFORD PHASE ONE TRACT R-4U22430010583 ARROWHEAD RESERVE AT LAKE TRAFFORD POA, INC 7742 ALICO RDFORT MYERS, FL 33912---0 ARROWHEAD RESERVE AT LAKE TRAFFORD PHASE TWO TRACT R-8U22430010606 ARROWHEAD RESERVE AT LAKE TRAFFORD POA, INC 7742 ALICO RDFORT MYERS, FL 33912---0 ARROWHEAD RESERVE AT LAKE TRAFFORD PHASE TWO TRACT R-9U22425000029 ARROWHEAD RESERVE COMMERCIAL TRACT LLC 5150 TAMIAMI TRL N # 303 NAPLES, FL 34103---0 ARROWHEAD RESERVE COMMERCIAL TRACT S2U22430003040 ARROWHEAD RESERVE AT LAKE TRAFFORD POA, INC 7742 ALICO RDFORT MYERS, FL 33912---0 ARROWHEAD RESERVE AT LAKE TRAFFORD PHASE ONE TRACT O-1U55649000720 ARROYO, RAUL MENDOZA LIDIA AGUILAR MENDOZA PO BOX 2215IMMOKALEE, FL 34143---2215 LIBERTY LANDING LOT 24U55649000445 ASTREIDE, JEAN VITAL & MARIE 3556 LIBERTY WAYIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---2329 LIBERTY LANDING LOT 10U76850001021 AUGUSTE, FRANCEL MICHEL, MARIE R 2755 EDEN AVEIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---2163 TIMBER RIDGE UNIT ONE LOT 24U22430008621 AUGUSTIN, MELLILA 1158 BUSH ST EIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---2612 ARROWHEAD RESERVE AT LAKE TRAFFORD PHASE ONE BLK A LOT 18 U55649001266 AVELLANEDA, JOSE S MARISOL MENDOZA 3728 JUSTICE CIRIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---2323 LIBERTY LANDING LOT 51U30680400003 AVILES, CARLOS PO BOX 1752IMMOKALEE, FL 34143---1752 EDEN PARK A PORTION OF TRACT 3 DESC AS: COMM NW CNR SEC 32, E 30FT OF S 540FT TO POB, S 95.19FT, E 100FT, N 95FT, U22430009361 AYALA, LUIS E PO BOX 2551IMMOKALEE, FL 34143---2551 ARROWHEAD RESERVE AT LAKE TRAFFORD PHASE ONE BLK A LOT 55 U00072480001 AYALA, MAGDA PO BOX 1290IMMOKALEE, FL 34143---1290 31 46 29 BEG AT SE COR OF W1/2 OF NE1/4 OF NE1/4, W 495FT TO POB, W 1485FT, N 440FT, E 1485FT, S 440FT TO U60380080007 B J & J RENTALS LLC 3751 STATE ROAD 29 NIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---9792 MOBILE MANOR LOT 3 & 4U60380160008 B J & J RENTALS LLC 3751 STATE ROAD 29 NIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---9792 MOBILE MANOR LOT 5U60380200007 B J & J RENTALS LLC 3751 STATE ROAD 29 NIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---9792 MOBILE MANOR LOT 6 OR 1308 PG 1450U60380240009 B J & J RENTALS LLC 3751 STATE ROAD 29 NIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---9792 MOBILE MANOR LOT 7 OR 1308 PG 1450U60380360002 B J & J RENTALS LLC 3751 STATE ROAD 29 NIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---9792 MOBILE MANOR LOTS 10 + 11U55649001020 BAPTISTE, ROMENER 3680 JUSTICE CIRIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---2315 LIBERTY LANDING LOT 39U00071760007 BARRON COLLIER P'SHIP LLLP 2600 GOLDEN GATE PKWYNAPLES, FL 34105---3227 31 46 29 COMM N1/4 CNR, N 84 DEG W 650FT, S 664.6FT, N 87 DEG W 479.8FT, S 1882.76FT, ELY 200FT ALG SR 850, NLY U00071960001 BARRON COLLIER P'SHIP LLLP 2600 GOLDEN GATE PKWY # 200NAPLES, FL 34105---3227 31 46 29 S1/2 OF NE1/4, LESS R/W, LESS OR 739-675, 730-906, 621-1273, 770- 196, LESS OR 2280 PG 762 U55649002346 BAZILE, CIDOUANE & EDRINE 3643 JUSTICE CIRIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---2316 LIBERTY LANDING LOT 105U00072200003 BEAM, BILLY WAYNE % DONALD BEAM 1708 - 12TH AVE WBRADENTON, FL 34205---0 31 46 29 N1/2 OF N1/2 OF SE1/4 OF NE1/4 OF NE1/4, LESS E 180FTU55649000940 BELIZAIRE, PASSIANA 3660 JUSTICE CIRIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---2315 LIBERTY LANDING LOT 35U55649001509 BELLEVUE, EVELYNE 3776 JUSTICE CIRIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---2323 LIBERTY LANDING LOT 63U22430008281 BLOCKER PROP OF TENNESSEE INC 1303 NEW MARKET RD WIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---2253 ARROWHEAD RESERVE AT LAKE TRAFFORD PHASE ONE BLK A LOT 1U69060000667 BLOCKER, AMY N 1305 REFLECTIONS WAY #1IMMOKALEE, FL 34142---0 REFLECTIONS AT JUBILATION A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 54 UNIT 1U55649002867 BRAVO-MEJIA, LILIANA 3787 JUSTICE CIRIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---0 LIBERTY LANDING LOT 131U55649002702 BRIGNOL, MICHELINE DACHNA CIVIL PO BOX 1267IMMOKALEE, FL 34143---1267 LIBERTY LANDING LOT 123U55649002281 BUSTAMANTE, JOSE N GOMEZ HERMINIA GOMEZ 3631 JUSTICE CIRIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---2316 LIBERTY LANDING LOT 102U00072320006 C & C PROPERTIES OF IMMOKALEE 301 N 15TH STIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---3402 31 46 29 SE1/4 OF SE1/4 OF NE1/4 OF NE1/4, LESS S 30FTU00073040000 C & C PROPERTIES OF IMMOKALEE PO BOX 970IMMOKALEE, FL 34143---970 31 46 29 E 115FT OF SW1/4 OF SE1/4 OF NE1/4 OF NE1/4, LESS S 150FT .48 AC OR 1294 PG 1679 U00073160003 C & C PROPERTIES OF IMMOKALEE PO BOX 970IMMOKALEE, FL 34143---970 31 46 29 S 150FT OF E 115FT OF SW1/4 OF SE1/4 OF NE1/4 OF NE1/4, LESS S 30FT R/W U22430008320 CALDERON, OSVALDO REY JUANITA MEZA 1222 BUSH ST EIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---0 ARROWHEAD RESERVE AT LAKE TRAFFORD PHASE ONE BLK A LOT 3U55649001428 CALIXTE, MAGDALA DUMAY 3760 JUSTICE CIRIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---2323 LIBERTY LANDING LOT 59U55649000801 CALVAIRE, MARC RAYMOND ORGETTE O CALVAIRE 3632 JUSTICE CIRIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---2315 LIBERTY LANDING LOT 28U55649002168 CALVAIRE, RUTH D 3607 JUSTICE CIRIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---2316 LIBERTY LANDING LOT 96U55649000403 CAMPOS, ARMANDINA 3548 LIBERTY WAYIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---2329 LIBERTY LANDING LOT 8U22430009769 CANTAVE, FLEURETTE PO BOX 3001IMMOKALEE, FL 34142---0 ARROWHEAD RESERVE AT LAKE TRAFFORD PHASE ONE BLK A LOT 75 U55649003206 CANTAVE, PHANELY 3885 JUSTICE CIRIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---0 LIBERTY LANDING LOT 148U22430010088 CARDENAS, LETICIA RAUL CHAVEZ 1283 ADAMS CTIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---0 ARROWHEAD RESERVE AT LAKE TRAFFORD PHASE ONE BLK A LOT 91 U55649000762 CARILUS, MINOUCHE 3624 JUSTICE CIRIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---2315 LIBERTY LANDING LOT 26U55649002401 CARRILLO, MARTHA L 3655 JUSTICE CIRIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---2316 LIBERTY LANDING LOT 108U22430010101 CASSEUS, DELIVRANCE 1275 ADAMS CTIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---2627 ARROWHEAD RESERVE AT LAKE TRAFFORD PHASE ONE BLK A LOT 92 U00073000008 CASTANEDA, JESUS O OFELIA C DIMAS CASTANEDA PO BOX 448IMMOKALEE, FL 34143---448 31 46 29 W 100FT OF E 215FT OF SW1/4 OF SE1/4 OF NE1/4 OF NE1/4, LESS S 230FT .23 U22430009840 CASTRO, JORGE E VERONICA MEZA 1217 E BUSH STIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---0 ARROWHEAD RESERVE AT LAKE TRAFFORD PHASE ONE BLK A LOT 79 U60380280001 CERVANTEZ, JUAN HERNANDEZ, MARION P O BOX 3426IMMOKALEE, FL 34143---0 MOBILE MANOR LOT 8U55649000607 CHARLENORD, DESTINE CHRISTIANE CHARLENORD 3588 LIBERTY WAYIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---0 LIBERTY LANDING LOT 18U22430008427 CHARLES, ALERTE 1202 BUSH ST EIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---0 ARROWHEAD RESERVE AT LAKE TRAFFORD PHASE ONE BLK A LOT 8U22430008689 CHARLES, BETHIE JEAN 1146 BUSH ST EIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---2612 ARROWHEAD RESERVE AT LAKE TRAFFORD PHASE ONE BLK A LOT 21 U55649001648 CHARLES, MARIE WISLAINE 3804 JUSTICE CIRCLEIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---0 LIBERTY LANDING LOT 70U52658001221 CHARLES, WISNER & ROSELINE 1231 FRIENDSHIP WAYIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---0 JUBILATION LOT 30U55649002760 CHAVIS, FELIX IRMA I IBARRA 3767 JUSTICE CIRIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---2323 LIBERTY LANDING LOT 126U55649001402 CHERILUS, FRANCOIS JOCELINE CHERILUS CLERVIL 3756 JUSTICE CIRIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---2323 LIBERTY LANDING LOT 58U55649002906 CHERY, MONTAL MARIE MERCIA CHERY CASSEUS 3795 JUSTICE CIRIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---0 LIBERTY LANDING LOT 133U22430008728 CHEVERY, JEAN C 1138 BUSH ST EIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---0 ARROWHEAD RESERVE AT LAKE TRAFFORD PHASE ONE BLK A LOT 23 U52658000989 COLAS, JEAN CLAUDE MYRLANDE COLAS 1134 SERENITY LNIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---2193 JUBILATION LOT 18U22430003202 COLLIER CNTY TRANSPORTATION RIGHT-OF-WAY 2885 HORSESHOE DRIVE S NAPLES, FL 34104---0 ARROWHEAD RESERVE AT LAKE TRAFFORD PHASE ONE TRACT R-1UNotice: This data belongs to the Collier County Property Appraiser's Office (CCPA). Therefore, the recipient agrees not to represent this data to anyone as other than CCPA provided data. The recipient may not transfer this data to others without consent from the CCPA.Petition: PL20200001827 (PUDZ) | Buffer: 1000' | Date: 2/22/2021 | Site Location: 00071960001 (Proposed RCMA Immokalee MPUD)POList_1000_PL20200001827.xls9.A.1.ePacket Pg. 326Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) 222430003228 COLLIER CNTY TRANSPORTATION RIGHT-OF-WAY 2885 HORSESHOE DRIVE S NAPLES, FL 34104---0 ARROWHEAD RESERVE AT LAKE TRAFFORD PHASE ONE TRACT R-2U52658000329 COLLIER CNTY TRANSPORTATION RIGHT-OF-WAY 2885 HORSESHOE DRIVE S NAPLES, FL 34104---0 JUBILATION TRACT F DEDICATED IN FEE SIMPLE TO COLLIER CO PLAT BOOK 37 PG 4 U00082963806 COLLIER CNTY TRANSPORTATION RIGHT-OF-WAY 2885 HORSESHOE DRIVE S NAPLES, FL 34104---0 32 46 29 COM AT NW CNR SW1/4 N 89DEG E 663.4FT, S 39.09FT & POB, N 89DEG E 165.86FT,S 15FT W 165.85FT, N 15FT TO POB U76850000543 COLLIER COUNTY 3335 TAMIAMI TRL ENAPLES, FL 34112---0 TIMBER RIDGE UNIT ONE TR RU22430009727 COLLIER HEALTH SERVICES INC PO BOX 870IMMOKALEE, FL 34143---0 ARROWHEAD RESERVE AT LAKE TRAFFORD PHASE ONE BLK A LOT 73 U22430009808 COSTILLA, MICHAEL 1207 BUSH ST EIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---2623 ARROWHEAD RESERVE AT LAKE TRAFFORD PHASE ONE BLK A LOT 77 U22430000522 CRESTVIEW I VENTURE LP 2711 N SPEULVEDA BLVD STE 526MANHATTAN BEACH, CA 90226---0 ARROWHEAD RESERVE AT LAKE TRAFFORD PHASE ONE THAT PORT OF TRS 2 & S DESC OR 3825 PG 2527 U00073200002 CRUZ, RAYMUNDO GONZALEZ HUMBERTA REBOLLEDO VILCHIS EDWIN GONZALEZ 508 NEW MARKET RD W IMMOKALEE, FL 34142---0 31 46 29 SW1/4 OF SE1/4 OF NE1/4 OF NE1/4, LESS E 215FT + S 210FTU55649000908 CRUZ, SOYLA M 3652 JUSTICE CIRIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---2315 LIBERTY LANDING LOT 33U22430010143 CUELLO, OSCAR VARELA DORA A VILLANUEVA PO BOX 911IMMOKALEE, FL 34143---0 ARROWHEAD RESERVE AT LAKE TRAFFORD PHASE ONE BLK A LOT 94 U69060000683 CUEVAS, LETICIA 1305 REFLECTIONS WAY UNIT 2IMMOKALEE, FL 34142---2234 REFLECTIONS AT JUBILATION A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 54 UNIT 2U55649003248 CUEVAS, LUIS A TOPETE CYNTHIA PONCE VEGA 3899 JUSTICE CIRIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---0 LIBERTY LANDING LOT 150U52658000921 DALUSMA, JONITE AVRIL ENDJI DALUSMA 1141 SERENITY LNIMMOKALEE, FL 34143---7135 JUBILATION LOT 15U00080640008 DE LA ROSA, AURORA 550 N 19TH ST LOT 90IMMOKALEE, FL 34142---2686 32 46 29 N 85FT OF S 640FT OF W1/2 OF W1/2 OF W1/2 OF NW1/4 OF SW1/4 .32 AC OR 1718 PG 134 U00072880009 DE LEON, MARIA L PO BOX 5195IMMOKALEE, FL 34143---0 31 46 29 COMM AT NW CNR OF NE1/4, E 150FT TO POB, E 60FT, S 440FT, W 60FT, N 440FT TO POB .61 AC OR 407 PGU55649000500 DELAROSA, MELISSA 3568 LIBERTY WAYIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---0 LIBERTY LANDING LOT 13U22430008401 DELOUIS, JEAN-GOUNAUD 1206 BUSH ST EIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---2622 ARROWHEAD RESERVE AT LAKE TRAFFORD PHASE ONE BLK A LOT 7U76850000909 DELOUIS, MARIE I LUCINE AUGUSTE PO BOX 1316IMMOKALEE, FL 34142---0 TIMBER RIDGE UNIT ONE LOT 18U55649003002 DELVA. JACKSON & ANDREMENE PO BOX 1381IMMOKALEE, FL 34143---0 LIBERTY LANDING LOT 138U52658000882 DENIZE, JEAN R SIMON DENIZ MICHELINE DENIZE NELSON PO BOX 1815 IMMOKALEE, FL 34143---1815 JUBILATION LOT 13U55649000306 DESTINE, SHEILA 3528 LIBERTY WAYIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---2329 LIBERTY LANDING LOT 3U52658001069 DEWANE, FRANK J BISHOP OF THE DIOCESE OF VENICE A CORP SOLE 1000 PINEBROOK RD VENICE, FL 34285---0 JUBILATION LOT 22U52658000727 DURAN, ROMELIA 1103 SERENITY WAYIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---0 JUBILATION LOT 5U22430010127 E D & J M LOUKONEN TRUST PO BOX 1990IMMOKALEE, FL 34143---1990 ARROWHEAD RESERVE AT LAKE TRAFFORD PHASE ONE BLK A LOT 93 U00073361103 EDEN GARDENS APARTMENTS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP PO BOX 343529FLORIDA CITY, FL 33034---529 31 46 29 A TRACT OF LAND LYING IN NE1/4 BEING MORE PARTICULLARLY DESCRIBED IN OR 3813 PG 721, LESS OR 4157 U00073361404 EDEN GARDENS APARTMENTS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP PO BOX 343529FLORIDA CITY, FL 33034---529 31 46 29 COMM NW CRN OF NE1/4, S 0DEG E 440.04FT, N 89DEG E 986.74FT TO POB; S 0DEG E 192.89FT TO PT ON CRV CONCAVES U00072160004 EDEN GARDENS II LLC PO BOX 343529FLORIDA CITY, FL 33034---529 31 46 29 BEG NE CNR OF NW1/4 OF NE1/4 OF NE1/4, RUN S 440FT TO POB, CONT S 440FT, W 1980FT, N 440FT, E 1980FT TO U00073361006 EDEN GARDENS II LLC PO BOX 343529FLORIDA CITY, FL 33034---529 31 46 29 COMM AT NE CNR SEC 31 RUN W 1400FT TO POB, S 440FT, W 60FT, N 440FT, E 60FT TO POB LESS WESTCLOX ST ON NORTH U00073361307 EDEN GARDENS II LLC PO BOX 343529FLORIDA CITY, FL 33034---529 31 46 29 COMM NW CNR OF NE1/4, S 01DEG E 440.04FT, N 89DEG E 1976.72FT, S 01DEG E 158.58FT TO POB; S 0DEG E 281.39FT, S U55649002825 EDMOND, JUMEL & GINA 3779 JUSTICE CIRIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---2323 LIBERTY LANDING LOT 129U69060000146 ELIE, CARL 1332 REFLECTION LANE UNIT 7IMMOKALEE, FL 34142---0 REFLECTIONS AT JUBILATION A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 50 UNIT 7U55649002524 ELISME, BETTY 3695 JUSTICE CIRIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---2316 LIBERTY LANDING LOT 114U55649000542 ELTINOR, JEAN J 3576 LIBERTY WAYIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---2329 LIBERTY LANDING LOT 15U55649002841 ESPINOZA, BRENDA 3783 JUSTICE CIRIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---2325 LIBERTY LANDING LOT 130U22430009743 ESPINOZA, JOAQUIN MARIA RODRIGUEZ 1209 MADISON CTIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---2624 ARROWHEAD RESERVE AT LAKE TRAFFORD PHASE ONE BLK A LOT 74 U69060000201 ESPINOZA-CAMACHO, JAIME 1328 REFLECTIONS LANE #2IMMOKALEE, FL 34142---0 REFLECTIONS AT JUBILATION A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 51 UNIT 2U55649002605 ETIENNE, JOSEPH R & ROSE M 3711 JUSTICE CIRIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---2323 LIBERTY LANDING LOT 118U22430009468 EUGENE, JOSETTE C 1236 MADISON CTIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---2624 ARROWHEAD RESERVE AT LAKE TRAFFORD PHASE ONE BLK A LOT 60 U22430009345 EVERETT D LOUKONEN REV TRUST PO BOX 1990IMMOKALEE, FL 34143---1990 ARROWHEAD RESERVE AT LAKE TRAFFORD PHASE ONE BLK A LOT 54 U55649003167 EXAMA, NESLIE 3877 JUSTICE CIRCLEIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---0 LIBERTY LANDING LOT 146U55649000364 EXCEUS, JEAN CLAUDE & ANTIDA 3540 LIBERTY WAYIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---2329 LIBERTY LANDING LOT 6U55649000429 FABIEN, ERTHA 3552 LIBERTY WAYIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---2329 LIBERTY LANDING LOT 9U22430008702 FEGUEROA, SAMANTHA 1142 BUSH ST EIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---2612 ARROWHEAD RESERVE AT LAKE TRAFFORD PHASE ONE BLK A LOT 22 U00075760003 FIRST UNITED PENTECOSTAL CHURCH OF IMMOKALEE INC PO BOX 5265IMMOKALEE, FL 34143---5265 32 46 29 N 660FT OF E1/2 OF W1/2 OF E1/2 OF NW1/4 OF SW1/4 2.5 AC U00079160007 FISH, HENRY ALLEN & BARBARA 321 W MAIN STIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---3930 32 46 29 E1/2 OF W1/2 OF W1/2 OF NW1/4 OF SW1/4, LESS S1110FT LESS LAKE TRAFFORD RD U76850001005 FL NON-PROFIT SERVICES INC PO BOX 343529FLORIDA CITY, FL 33034---0 TIMBER RIDGE UNIT ONE LOT 23 OR 2128 PG 2300U76850000983 FL NON-PROFIT SERVICES INC PO BOX 343529FLORIDA CITY, FL 33034---0 TIMBER RIDGE UNIT ONE LOT 22U22430008346 FL STAR CONSTRUCTION LLC 7742 ALICO ROADFORT MYERS, FL 33912---0 ARROWHEAD RESERVE AT LAKE TRAFFORD PHASE ONE BLK A LOT 4U22430009866 FLORES, ASHLEY J 1264 ADAMS CTIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---2626 ARROWHEAD RESERVE AT LAKE TRAFFORD PHASE ONE BLK A LOT 80 U22430008663 FLORIDA NON-PROFIT SERV INC PO BOX 343529FLORIDA CITY, FL 33034---0 ARROWHEAD RESERVE AT LAKE TRAFFORD PHASE ONE BLK A LOT 20 U22430010020 FLORIDA NON-PROFIT SERV INC PO BOX 343529FLORIDA CITY, FL 33034---0 ARROWHEAD RESERVE AT LAKE TRAFFORD PHASE ONE BLK A LOT 88 U76850000967 FLORIDA NON-PROFIT SRVS INC PO BOX 343529FLORIDA CITY, FL 33034---0 TIMBER RIDGE UNIT ONE LOT 21U55649000665 FRANCISCO, MARIA T 3604 JUSTICE CIRIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---2315 LIBERTY LANDING LOT 21U55649000681 FRANCISCO, MIGUEL A GASPAR 3608 JUSTICE CIRIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---2315 LIBERTY LANDING LOT 22U22430009060 FRANCOIS, REGINE 1129 BUSH ST EIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---2620 ARROWHEAD RESERVE AT LAKE TRAFFORD PHASE ONE BLK A LOT 40 U22430008388 FRANCOIS, SUZE 1210 BUSH ST EIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---0 ARROWHEAD RESERVE AT LAKE TRAFFORD PHASE ONE BLK A LOT 6U25578000203 FREDERICK, JAMES 1009 WELLS AVELEHIGH ACRES, FL 33972---0 CARSON ROAD MOBILE HOME SUBDIVISION LOT 4U25578000229 FREDERICK, JAMES 1009 WELLS AVELEHIGH ACRES, FL 33972---0 CARSON ROAD MOBILE HOME SUBDIVISION LOT 5U22430009604 FRIAS, EVA L GILBERTO SALAZAR 1243 MADISON CTIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---2624 ARROWHEAD RESERVE AT LAKE TRAFFORD PHASE ONE BLK A LOT 67 U55649001185 FRIAS, MIGUEL A & LETICIA 3712 JUSTICE CIRIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---2323 LIBERTY LANDING LOT 47U00071520001 FUSSELL, BARBARA 3203 WESTCLOX STIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---0 31 46 29 BEG NE CNR SEC 31, WLY 890FT ALG N BNDRY, S 220FT TO POB, S 220FT, W 100FT, N 220FT, E 100FT TO U00072600001 FUSSELL, BARBARA 3203 WESTCLOX STIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---0 31 46 29 BEG NE COR OF SEC W ALG NLY BOUNDARY LI 790FT, S 220FT FOR POB, S 220FT, W 100FT, N 220FT, E 100FT TO U00072560002 FUSSELL, PATRICIA L 3413 WESTCLOX STIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---2033 31 46 29 BEG AT NW COR OF NE1/4 RUN E 600FT TO POB, E 200FT, S 440FT, W 200FT, N 440FT TO POB 2.02 AC U00072680005 FUSSELL, ROGER & BARBARA 3203 WESTCLOX STIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---0 31 46 29 BEG NE CNR SEC, RUN W ALG N BDRY 690FT, THENCE S 220FT TO POB, S 220FT, W 100FT, N 220FT, E 100FT TO U00071320007 FUSSELL, ROGER W & BARBARA A 3203 WESTCLOX STIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---0 31 46 29 BEG AT NE COR OF SEC, RUN W ALG N SEC LI 1090FT TO POB, CONT W 200FT, S 440FT, E 200FT, N 440FT TO U00071640004 FUSSELL, ROGER W & BARBARA A 3203 WESTCLOX STIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---2087 31 46 29 BEG NE COR RUN W 900FT, S 220FT FOR POB, S 220FT, W 100FT, N 220FT, E 100FT TO POB .5 AC U69060000120 GADSDEN, DEBRA ANN PO BOX 1265IMMOKALEE, FL 34143---1265 REFLECTIONS AT JUBILATION A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 50 UNIT 6U22430012662 GALLEGOS, JOSIAH DARREN OUTZEN 1332 LINCOLN CTIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---0 ARROWHEAD RESERVE AT LAKE TRAFFORD PHASE TWO BLK D LOT 103 U55649002540 GALVAN, EDGAR M JACQUELINE RAMIREZ MENDOZA 3699 JUSTICE CIRIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---2316 LIBERTY LANDING LOT 115U55649002964 GALVAN, FRANCISCO RAQUEL LIGAS 3807 JUSTICE CIRIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---2325 LIBERTY LANDING LOT 136U00071280008 GAMEZ, ANGEL LUIS IRMA G ROMERO GRACE GAMEZ HUDSON 1276 FRIENDSHIP DR IMMOKALEE, FL 34142---0 31 46 29 COMM NW CNR OF NE1/4, E 800FT, S 270FT, E 196 FT TO POB, N 50FT, E 194FT, S 220FT, W 194FT, N 170FT TO POB U00072920008 GAMEZ, NICHOLAS M 1400 BOXWOOD DRIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---2006 31 46 29 COMM AT NE CNR OF SEC 31, W 1390FT, S 220FT TO POB, S 220FT, E 100FT, N 220FT, W 100FT TO POB .5 AC U55649002948 GARCIA, JOSE R COSTILLA MARIA L MARTINEZ COSTILLA 3803 JUSTICE CIRCLE IMMOKALEE, FL 34142---0 LIBERTY LANDING LOT 135U22430008443 GARCIA, MARIA PO BOX 113IMMOKALEE, FL 34143---113 ARROWHEAD RESERVE AT LAKE TRAFFORD PHASE ONE BLK A LOT 9U00072440009 GARCIA, MARLO D PO BOX 1290IMMOKALEE, FL 34143---1290 31 46 29 BEG 297FT W OF SE COR OF W1/2 OF NE1/4 OF NE1/4, W 198FT, N 440FT, E 198FT, S 440FT, LESS S 30FT U55649003183 GARCIA, RICK 3881 JUSTICE CIRCLEIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---0 LIBERTY LANDING LOT 147U00072960000 GERONIMO, ALICIA F 3014 CURRY RDIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---0 31 46 29 N 100FT OF W 100FT OF S 230FT OF E 215FT OF SW1/4 OF SE1/4 OF NE1/4 OF NE1/4 .49 AC OR 638 PG 581U69060000324 GOMEZ, SANTOS L 1328 REFLECTIONS LN UNIT 8IMMOKALEE, FL 34142---2226 REFLECTIONS AT JUBILATION A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 51 UNIT 8U22430009646 GONZALEZ, ANDRES LEDESMA GABRIELA MONTOYA GAMBOA PO BOX 1908IMMOKALEE, FL 34143---1908 ARROWHEAD RESERVE AT LAKE TRAFFORD PHASE ONE BLK A LOT 69 U22430009785 GONZALEZ, ANDRES LEDESMA GABRIELA MONTOYA GAMBOA PO BOX 1908IMMOKALEE, FL 34143---1908 ARROWHEAD RESERVE AT LAKE TRAFFORD PHASE ONE BLK A LOT 76 U22430008540 GONZALEZ, ANDRES LEDESMA GABRIELA MONTOYA-GAMBOA PO BOX 1908IMMOKALEE, FL 34143---1908 ARROWHEAD RESERVE AT LAKE TRAFFORD PHASE ONE BLK A LOT 14 U00071160005 GONZALEZ, GUADALUPE & EVA 3601 WESTCLOX STIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---2029 31 46 29 BEG AT NW COR OF NE1/4, RUN E ALG N SEC LI 150FT, S 440FT, W 150FT, N 310FT,E 75FT, N 100FT, W 75FT U60380040005 GONZALEZ, JUAN & ALICIA M PO BOX 764IMMOKALEE, FL 34143---764 MOBILE MANOR LOTS 1 + 2 OR 1376 PG 1900-01U22430009125 GONZALEZ, LILIANA OLIVARES 1141 BUSH ST EIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---0 ARROWHEAD RESERVE AT LAKE TRAFFORD PHASE ONE BLK A LOT 43 U51677516565 GONZALEZ, LUIS & ELISA 1513 PEACE WAYIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---2440 INDEPENDENCE PHASE TWO A LOT 140U00071680006 GONZALEZ, OLIVIA M 3501 WESTCLOX STIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---2031 31 46 29 BEG NW CNR OF NE1/4, E 505FT TO POB, E 95FT, S 440FT, W 95FT, N 440FT TO POB .96 AC OR 1973 PG 1068 U22430009905 GONZALEZ, PEDRO DIAZ 1272 ADAMS CTIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---0 ARROWHEAD RESERVE AT LAKE TRAFFORD PHASE ONE BLK A LOT 82 U00073361501 GUADALUPE CENTER REAL ESTATE HOLDINGS INC 509 HOPE CIRIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---0 31 46 29 A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN SEC 31 AS DESC IN OR 5737 PG 3713 U52658000442 GUADALUPE CENTER REAL ESTATE HOLDINGS INC 509 HOPE CIRCLEIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---0 JUBILATION TRACT H AND THAT LAND PORTION DESC IN OR 4321 PG 3601U52658001166 GUAJARDO, LUCIA 1243 FRIENSHIP WAYIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---0 JUBILATION LOT 27U69060000285 GUTIRREZ, JAVIER DAISY MARTINEZ 1328 REFLECTIONS LN UNIT 6 IMMOKALEE, FL 34142---2226 REFLECTIONS AT JUBILATION A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 51 UNIT 6U52658001027 GUZMAN, RUFINO ALICIA RAMOS 1126 SERENITY LNIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---0 JUBILATION LOT 20U55649002744 HABITAT FOR HUMANITY COLLIER COUNTY INC 11145 TAMIAMI TRL E NAPLES, FL 34113---0 LIBERTY LANDING LOT 125U55649000788 HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF COLLIER COUNTY INC 11145 TAMIAMI TRAIL E NAPLES, FL 34113---0 LIBERTY LANDING LOT 27U55649000241 HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF COLLIER COUNTY INC 11145 TAMIAMI TRL E NAPLES, FL 34113---7753 LIBERTY LANDING TRACT RU00073320005 HANDY FOOD STORES INC % HANDY #75 PO BOX 1808TAMPA, FL 33601---1808 31 46 29 COMM E1/4 CNR N 1 DEG W 243.21FT, N 88 DEG W 30.03FT FOR POB, S 1 DEG E 200FT, WLY 200.08FT N 1 DEG W UPOList_1000_PL20200001827.xls9.A.1.ePacket Pg. 327Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) 322430009662 HENRY, FRITZ NICOLE HENRY 1227 MADISON CTIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---2624 ARROWHEAD RESERVE AT LAKE TRAFFORD PHASE ONE BLK A LOT 70 U00072240005 HERNANDEZ JR, ERASMO & ROSA M PO BOX 39IMMOKALEE, FL 34143---39 31 46 29 BEG AT NE COR OF N1/2 OF SE1/4 OF NE1/4 OF NE1/4 OF SEC, S ALG W BDRY 75FT, W 150FT, N 75FT, E U22430008485 HERNANDEZ, DAVID M & CRISTINA PO BOX 277IMMOKALEE, FL 34143---0 ARROWHEAD RESERVE AT LAKE TRAFFORD PHASE ONE BLK A LOT 11 U69060000405 HERNANDEZ, MARIA VICTORIA 1325 REFLECTIONS WAY #52-4IMMOKALEE, FL 34142---0 REFLECTIONS AT JUBILATION A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 52 UNIT 4U60380320000 HERNANDEZ, MARION 2915 DIMAR LNIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---0 MOBILE MANOR LOT 9U76850000941 HERNANDEZ, SANTIAGO MARIA DEL ROSARIO PO BOX 3435IMMOKALEE, FL 34143---0 TIMBER RIDGE UNIT ONE LOT 20U30680601006 HERRERA JR, PEDRO ROSITA TURRUBIARTEZ PO BOX 2029IMMOKALEE, FL 34143---2029 EDEN PARK BEG AT NW CNR OF SEC 32, E 30FT, S 400FT FOR POB, S 140FT, E 100FT, N 140FT, W 100FT TO POB,U55649002362 HOLLAND, SUEKO N 3647 JUSTICE CIRIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---2316 LIBERTY LANDING LOT 106U55649000461 HOMME, VERDIEU PETIT & MARIA L 3560 LIBERTY WAYIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---2329 LIBERTY LANDING LOT 11U52658000688 HUANG, XIAO QI MING 1111 SERENITY WAYIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---0 JUBILATION LOT 3U30680480007 HUAPILLA ZAPOTE, MIGUEL PO BOX 3406IMMOKALEE, FL 34143---0 EDEN PARK BEG NW CNR SEC, E30FT, S330FT, E100FT, S 140FT TO POB, S70FT, E160 FT, N70FT, W160FT TO POB BEING A U69060000188 HUAPILLA, ALEJANDRO 1805 ROBERTS AVEIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---0 REFLECTIONS AT JUBILATION A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 51 UNIT 1U55649001321 HUGHES, TRACIA S 3740 JUSTICE CIRIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---2323 LIBERTY LANDING LOT 54U22430009183 IBARRA, JUANA M HERNANDEZ JOSE FLORES MARTINEZ 1155 BUSH ST EIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---2253 ARROWHEAD RESERVE AT LAKE TRAFFORD PHASE ONE BLK A LOT 46 U00072040001 IMMOKALEE CHURCH OF THE NAZARENE INC 1207 CARSON RDIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---0 31 46 29 COMM E1/4 CNR SEC N 1000FT, W 30FT TO POB, W 450FT, S 200FT,E 450FT, N 200FT TO POB U22425000045 IMMOKALEE FD LLC 14011 S W 20TH STMIAMI, FL 33175---0 ARROWHEAD RESERVE COMMERCIAL LOT 1U00073280006 IMMOKALEE FIRE CONTROL DIST 502 NEW MARKET RD EIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---3804 314629 COMM E1/4 CNR SECT 31, N 540FT, W 30FT TO POB, W 200FT, S 200FT, E 200FT, N 200FT TO POB OR 739 PG 675 U60380400001 IMMOKALEE MOBILE HOME PKS LLC 1109 MADISON AVE WIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---3029 MOBILE MANOR LOT 12 OR 1252 PG 756U60380440003 IMMOKALEE MOBILE HOME PKS LLC 1109 MADISON AVE WIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---3029 MOBILE MANOR LOT 13 OR 1252 PG 756U60380480005 IMMOKALEE MOBILE HOME PKS LLC 1109 MADISON AVE WIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---3029 MOBILE MANOR LOT 14 OR 1252 PG 756U60380520004 IMMOKALEE MOBILE HOME PKS LLC 1109 MADISON AVE WIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---3029 MOBILE MANOR LOT 15 OR 1252 PG 756U60380560006 IMMOKALEE MOBILE HOME PKS LLC 1109 MADISON AVE WIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---3029 MOBILE MANOR LOT 16 OR 1252 PG 756U60380600005 IMMOKALEE MOBILE HOME PKS LLC 1109 MADISON AVE WIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---3029 MOBILE MANOR LOT 17 OR 1252 PG 756U60380640007 IMMOKALEE MOBILE HOME PKS LLC 1109 MADISON AVE WIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---3029 MOBILE MANOR LOT 18 OR 1252 PG 756U60380680009 IMMOKALEE MOBILE HOME PKS LLC 1109 MADISON AVE WIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---3029 MOBILE MANOR LOT 19 OR 1252 PG 756U60380720008 IMMOKALEE MOBILE HOME PKS LLC 1109 MADISON AVE WIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---3029 MOBILE MANOR LOT 20 OR 1252 PG 756U60380760000 IMMOKALEE MOBILE HOME PKS LLC 1109 MADISON AVE WIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---3029 MOBILE MANOR LOT 21 OR 1252 PG 756U00073360201 IMMOKALEE WATER & SEWER DIST 1020 SANITATION RDIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---4238 31 46 29 COMM AT E1/4 CNR SEC 31, N 600FT, N89DEG W 30FT, CONT W 200FT TO POB, N89DEG W 250FT, N 200FT, S89DEG E 250FT U00072000009 IMMOKALEE WATER & SEWER DIST PO BOX 618IMMOKALEE, FL 34143---618 31 46 29 COMM E1/4 CNR, N 600FT, W 30FT TO POB, N 200FT, W 200FT, S 200FT, E 200FT TO POB .92 AC OR 927 PG U52658000808 INNOVATION CONSTRUCTION & DEVELOPMENT LLC 136 NAPA RIDGE WAY NAPLES, FL 34119---0 JUBILATION LOT 9U69060000227 INVADOR3 LLC 256 PEBBLE BEACH CIR # 104NAPLES, FL 34113---7691 REFLECTIONS AT JUBILATION A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 51 UNIT 3U55649002980 IRIZARRY, HILDA 3811 JUSTICE CIRIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---2325 LIBERTY LANDING LOT 137U00075840004 J B RENTALS #2 LLC 1830 16TH STREET NENAPLES, FL 34120---0 32 46 29 E1/2 OF W1/2 OF NW1/4 OF SW1/4 ECX HWYU55649002265 JAIMES, NIELIDA 3627 JUSTICE CIRIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---2316 LIBERTY LANDING LOT 101U55649001004 JEAN BAPTISTE SERGOT SOUVERAIN MARIE E SOUVERAIN 3672 JUSTICE CIRIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---2315 LIBERTY LANDING LOT 38U52658001043 JEAN PIERRE, MORANIE 1151 SERENITY WAYIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---2192 JUBILATION LOT 21U55649002663 JEAN, BLANDEL & JUDITH 3729 JUSTICE CIRIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---2323 LIBERTY LANDING LOT 121U55649002621 JEAN, LOUIS M ANTOINISE ADRASSE JEAN 3715 JUSTICE CIRIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---0 LIBERTY LANDING LOT 119U55649001460 JEAN, MARIE 3768 JUSTICE CIRIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---2323 LIBERTY LANDING LOT 61U55649001224 JEAN, MARIE GERALDE 3720 JUSTICE CIRIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---0 LIBERTY LANDING LOT 49U55649002582 JEANNOT, WALNA 3707 JUSTICE CIRIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---2323 LIBERTY LANDING LOT 117U69060000463 JEAN-PHILLIPE, TERVEUS & MARIE 1325 REFLECTIONS WAY UNIT 7IMMOKALEE, FL 34142---2262 REFLECTIONS AT JUBILATION A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 52 UNIT 7U55649003141 JOCILIEN, SADINE & CELARES 3873 JUSTICE CIRCLEIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---0 LIBERTY LANDING LOT 145U55649001240 JORCELIN, MARIE G 3724 JUSTICE CIRIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---2323 LIBERTY LANDING LOT 50U52658000866 JORVELUS, GRAMOND & MARIE E 1129 SERENITY LNIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---2193 JUBILATION LOT 12U55649001567 JOSEPH, CRISLA 3788 JUSTICE CIRIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---2323 LIBERTY LANDING LOT 66U55649002809 JOSEPH, GIVER 3775 JUSTICE CIRIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---2323 LIBERTY LANDING LOT 128U55649001444 JOSEPH, PIERRE SOLANO MARIE CHANTALE ESPERANCE 3764 JUSTICE CIRIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---2323 LIBERTY LANDING LOT 60U52658001001 JUBILATION COMMUNITY ASSN INC % GOLDEN PROPERTY MGMT SERVICE 4099 TAMIAMI TRL N STE 403 NAPLES, FL 34103---0 JUBILATIONLOT 19U52658000947 JUBILATION COMMUNITY ASSN INC %GOLDEN PROPERTY MGMT SERVICES 4099 TAMIAMI TRL N STE 403 NAPLES, FL 34103---0 JUBILATIONLOT 16U52658000303 JUBILATION COMMUNITY ASSN INC 12811 KENWOOD LN #103FT MYERS, FL 33907---0 JUBILATION TRACT EU52658000549 JUBILATION COMMUNITY ASSN INC 12811 KENWOOD LN #103FT MYERS, FL 33907---0 JUBILATION TRACT IU52658000222 JUBILATION COMMUNITY ASSN INC 1840 BOY SCOUT DR UNIT BFORT MYERS, FL 33907---2115 JUBILATION TRACT BU52658000264 JUBILATION COMMUNITY ASSN INC 1840 BOY SCOUT DR UNIT BFORT MYERS, FL 33907---2115 JUBILATION TRACT CU52658000620 JUBILATION COMMUNITY ASSN INC 1840 BOY SCOUT DR UNIT BFORT MYERS, FL 33907---2115 JUBILATION TRACT KU52658000345 JUBILATION HOLDINGS 1 LLC 8101 RICHARDSON RD #101COMMERCE TWP, MI 48390---0 JUBILATION TRACT GU52658000280 JUBILATION HOLDINGS 2 LLC 848 1ST AVENUE NORTHNAPLES, FL 34102---0 JUBILATION TRACT DU52658000581 JUBILATION HOLDINGS 2 LLC 848 1ST AVENUE NORTHNAPLES, FL 34102---0 JUBILATION TRACT JU52658000963 JULES, MARIE L 1138 SERENITY LNIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---2193 JUBILATION LOT 17U22430008566 K & B RES RENTAL'S #1 LLC 1303 WEST NEW MARKET RDIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---0 ARROWHEAD RESERVE AT LAKE TRAFFORD PHASE ONE BLK A LOT 15 U22430009109 K & B RESIDENTAIL RENT #1 LLC 1303 NEW MARKET RD WIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---2253 ARROWHEAD RESERVE AT LAKE TRAFFORD PHASE ONE BLK A LOT 42 U22430009400 K & B RESIDENTIAL RENTALS #1 LLC 1303 NEW MARKET RD W IMMOKALEE, FL 34142---2253 ARROWHEAD RESERVE AT LAKE TRAFFORD PHASE ONE BLK A LOT 57 U22430009280 KEARSE, SANDRA 3326 9TH ST WESTLEHIGH ACRES, FL 33971---0 ARROWHEAD RESERVE AT LAKE TRAFFORD PHASE ONE BLK A LOT 51 U00073120001 KEMP, PATSY 3024 CURRY RDIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---2022 31 46 29 S 150FT OF SW1/4 OF SE1/4 OF NE1/4 OF NE1/4, LESS E 215FT AND S 30FT U00073080002 KEMP, PATSY SAMANTHA S RODRIGUEZ 3028 CURRY RDIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---2022 31 46 29 N 60FT OF S 210FT OF SW1/4 OF SE1/4 OF NE1/4 OF NE1/4, EXCEPT E 215FT .16 AC OR 1674 PG 216 U00072360008 KEMP, PATSY S TIMMIE L KEMP 3024 CURRY RDIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---2022 31 46 29 S 130FT OF W 100FT OF E 215FT OF SW1/4 OF SE1/4 OF NE1/4 OF NE1/4, LESS S 30FT .23 AC OR 1377 PG 1814 U55649000526 LAGUERRE, FERNANDE 3572 LIBERTY WAYIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---0 LIBERTY LANDING LOT 14U22430009248 LAGUERRE, IMELDA DECIMUS DARANT 1177 BUSH ST EIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---2620 ARROWHEAD RESERVE AT LAKE TRAFFORD PHASE ONE BLK A LOT 49 U55649000885 LARA, ARTURO A LARA BEATRIZ LARA 3648 JUSTICE CIRIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---2315 LIBERTY LANDING LOT 32U55649000966 LEANDRE, YVON 3664 JUSTICE CIRCLEIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---0 LIBERTY LANDING LOT 36U22430009921 LEON ET AL, MARIA VILLEGAS 1276 ADAMS CTIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---2626 ARROWHEAD RESERVE AT LAKE TRAFFORD PHASE ONE BLK A LOT 83 U69060000544 LEON, SELENA 550 N 19TH ST LOT 96IMMOKALEE, FL 34142---0 REFLECTIONS AT JUBILATION A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 53 UNIT 3U55649001169 LEZAMA, NORBERTO CHAVARRIA BEATRIS A IBARRA 3708 JUSTICE CIRIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---2323 LIBERTY LANDING LOT 46U55649000047 LIBERTY LANDING HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION INC %SENTRY MANAGEMENT, INC 2180 WEST SR 434 STE 5000 LONGWOOD, FL 32779---0 LIBERTY LANDING TRACT C-1U55649000144 LIBERTY LANDING HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION INC %SENTRY MANAGEMENT, INC 2180 WEST SR 434, STE 5000 LONGWOOD, FL 32779---0 LIBERTY LANDING TRACT C-6U55649000160 LIBERTY LANDING HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION INC %SENTRY MANAGEMENT, INC 2180 WEST SR 434, STE 5000 LONGWOOD, FL 32779---0 LIBERTY LANDING TRACT C-7U55649000209 LIBERTY LANDING HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION INC %SENTRY MANAGEMENT, INC 2180 WEST SR 434, STE 5000 LONGWOOD, FL 32779---0 LIBERTY LANDING TRACT L-2U55649000225 LIBERTY LANDING HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION INC %SENTRY MANAGEMENT, INC 2180 WEST SR 434, STE 5000 LONGWOOD, FL 32779---0 LIBERTY LANDING TRACT P-1U55649000063 LIBERTY LANDING HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION INC %SENTRY MANAGEMENT, INC 2180 WEST SR 434, STE 5000 LONGWOOD, FL 32779---0 LIBERTY LANDING TRACT C-2U55649000089 LIBERTY LANDING HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION INC %SENTRY MANAGEMENT, INC 2180 WEST SR 434, STE 5000 LONGWOOD, FL 32779---0 LIBERTY LANDING TRACT C-3U55649000186 LIBERTYLANDING HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION INC %SENTRY MANAGEMENT, INC 2180 WEST SR 434, STE 5000 LONGWOOD, FL 32779---0 LIBERTY LANDING TRACT L-1U52658000662 LOPEZ, JACOB & CARMELITA 1115 SERENITY WAYIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---2192 JUBILATION LOT 2U55649000843 LOUIMARE, EMMANUEL 3540 JUSTICE CIRIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---0 LIBERTY LANDING LOT 30U55649002469 LOUIMARE, LUTHERKEN BEATRICE LOUIMARE 3667 JUSTICE CIRIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---2316 LIBERTY LANDING LOT 111U22430009701 LOUIS, JOSEPH L MIRLENE ST FLAVIN 1219 MADISON CTIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---2624 ARROWHEAD RESERVE AT LAKE TRAFFORD PHASE ONE BLK A LOT 72 U55649002320 LOUISSAINT, DJO JULIENNE BIEN AIME 3639 JUSTICE CIRIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---0 LIBERTY LANDING LOT 104U55649002566 LUNA JR, ROBERT ANN LAURA GALVAN-FRIAS 3703 JUSTICE CIRIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---2323 LIBERTY LANDING LOT 116U55649002689 MADDY, DHERMAN 3751 JUSTICE CIRCLEIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---0 LIBERTY LANDING LOT 122U55649001101 MANDUJANO, RUBEN CAMILA MARTINEZ DE MANDUJANO 3696 JUSTICE CIRIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---2315 LIBERTY LANDING LOT 43U55649002485 MARTINEZ III, ERASMO TERESA ANN HINOJOSA 3685 JUSTICE CIRIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---2316 LIBERTY LANDING LOT 112U69060000803 MARTINEZ, JUANITA 1305 REFLECTIONS WAY UNIT 8IMMOKALEE, FL 34142---0 REFLECTIONS AT JUBILATION A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 54 UNIT 8U22430009581 MARTINEZ, MA ISABEL VELASCO ALVARO SALAZAR 1228 MADISON CTIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---2624 ARROWHEAD RESERVE AT LAKE TRAFFORD PHASE ONE BLK A LOT 66 U69060000023 MARTINEZ, MONICA JO PO BOX 1526IMMOKALEE, FL 34143---0 REFLECTIONS AT JUBILATION A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 50 UNIT 1U55649001305 MARTINEZ, NICOLAS JUANA-MARIA ESTRADA MARTINEZ 3736 JUSTICE CIRIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---2323 LIBERTY LANDING LOT 53U55649002207 MARTINEZ, RIGOBERTO 3615 JUSTICE CIRIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---2316 LIBERTY LANDING LOT 98U55649000924 MARTINEZ, ROBERT & JUANI G 3656 JUSTICE CIRIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---2315 LIBERTY LANDING LOT 34UPOList_1000_PL20200001827.xls9.A.1.ePacket Pg. 328Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) 455649002388 MATEO, ANDRES & MARIA 3651 JUSTICE CIRIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---2316 LIBERTY LANDING LOT 107U55649002142 MATHURIN, SERGE & MICHELENE 3603 JUSTICE CIRIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---2316 LIBERTY LANDING LOT 95U22430010062 MAYETTE, YFLO MONIQUE SAINCY 1133 BUSH ST EIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---2620 ARROWHEAD RESERVE AT LAKE TRAFFORD PHASE ONE BLK A LOT 90 U22430012769 MEDINA, ALEXANDRA MARIE 1312 LINCOLN CTIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---2785 ARROWHEAD RESERVE AT LAKE TRAFFORD PHASE TWO BLK D LOT 108 & 109 U52658001140 MELLADO, WALTER P 1247 FRIENDSHIP WAYIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---0 JUBILATION LOT 26U22430008524 MENDEZ, ANTONIO GARZA 1178 BUSH ST EIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---0 ARROWHEAD RESERVE AT LAKE TRAFFORD PHASE ONE BLK A LOT 13 U00072400007 MENDOZA, BALDEMAR 3106 CURRY RDIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---0 31 46 29 BEG AT SE COR OF W1/2 OF NE1/4 OF NE1/4, RUN W 297FT, N 440FT, E 297FT, S 440FT TO POB, LESS S 30FT U00072480108 MENDOZA, FLORENTINO ELIZABETH MENDOZA 1303 APPLE STIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---0 31 46 29, THAT PORTION OF LAND DESC IN OR 5752 PG 1076U22430010004 MENDOZA, GABRIEL LEE MARTHA ALICIA MENDOZA 1294 ADAMS CTIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---2626 ARROWHEAD RESERVE AT LAKE TRAFFORD PHASE ONE BLK A LOT 87 U25578000025 MENDOZA, PAULA HERNANDEZ PO BOX 665IMMOKALEE, FL 34143---0 CARSON ROAD MOBILE HOME SUBDIVISION TRACTS A & B U69060000586 MERCADO, ERWIN R MARGOTH CAMPOS MERCADO 1315 REFLECTIONS WAY #5 IMMOKALEE, FL 34142---0 REFLECTIONS AT JUBILATION A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 53 UNIT 5U55649001062 MERCURE, RITHA PO BOX 3273IMMOKALEE, FL 34143---3273 LIBERTY LANDING LOT 41U55649001606 METELUS, RAYMONDE FRITZ HYACINTHE PO BOX 1282IMMOKALEE, FL 34143---1282 LIBERTY LANDING LOT 68U00071480002 MILDRED W OLSON LIV TRUST % TIMOTHY MORELL 3407 SW BESSEY CREEK TRL PALM CITY, FL 34990---0 31 46 29 COMM AT NE CNR, W660FT, S 440FT, W 30FT, N 440 FT, E 30FT TO POB AKA MARION LN RES # 86-43 U55649003222 MORENO, CARLOS ANA C MARTHOS AGUILLON 3889 JUSTICE CIRIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---0 LIBERTY LANDING LOT 149U52658000824 MORENO, MARIA G MARIA I MORENO 1118 SERENITY WAYIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---2192 JUBILATION LOT 10U52658000646 MORENO, MARIA REMEDIOS 1119 SERENITY WAYIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---0 JUBILATION LOT 1U52658001182 MORENO-MENDOZA, MAYRA A 1239 FRIENDSHIP WAYIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---0 JUBILATION LOT 28U52658001108 MUELLER, ANDREAS J 9142 CHERRY OAKS LN UNIT 201NAPLES, FL 34114---0 JUBILATION LOT 24U55649000704 MUNOZ, DANIEL & ROSALINA T PO BOX 3618IMMOKALEE, FL 34143---3618 LIBERTY LANDING LOT 23U55649001347 NIETO, EVANGELINA 3744 JUSTICE CIRIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---2323 LIBERTY LANDING LOT 55U22430008582 NIETO, JORGE ROSAS MARIA G DE ROSAS 1166 BUSH ST EIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---2612 ARROWHEAD RESERVE AT LAKE TRAFFORD PHASE ONE BLK A LOT 16 U22430009882 NUNEZ, GARY & LUCINDA 1701 IMMOKALEE DRIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---3430 ARROWHEAD RESERVE AT LAKE TRAFFORD PHASE ONE BLK A LOT 81 U76850001351 OAK MARSH LLC PO BOX 343529FLORIDA CITY, FL 33034---0 TIMBER RIDGE UNIT TWO TRACT A (DE/COMMON AREA)U76850001429 OAK MARSH LLC PO BOX 343529FLORIDA CITY, FL 33034---0 TIMBER RIDGE UNIT TWO LOT 25U76850001445 OAK MARSH LLC PO BOX 343529FLORIDA CITY, FL 33034---0 TIMBER RIDGE UNIT TWO LOT 26U76850001461 OAK MARSH LLC PO BOX 343529FLORIDA CITY, FL 33034---0 TIMBER RIDGE UNIT TWO LOT 27U76850001487 OAK MARSH LLC PO BOX 343529FLORIDA CITY, FL 33034---0 TIMBER RIDGE UNIT TWO LOT 28U76850001500 OAK MARSH LLC PO BOX 343529FLORIDA CITY, FL 33034---0 TIMBER RIDGE UNIT TWO LOT 29U76850001526 OAK MARSH LLC PO BOX 343529FLORIDA CITY, FL 33034---0 TIMBER RIDGE UNIT TWO LOT 30U76850001542 OAK MARSH LLC PO BOX 343529FLORIDA CITY, FL 33034---0 TIMBER RIDGE UNIT TWO LOT 31U76850001568 OAK MARSH LLC PO BOX 343529FLORIDA CITY, FL 33034---0 TIMBER RIDGE UNIT TWO LOT 32U76850001584 OAK MARSH LLC PO BOX 343529FLORIDA CITY, FL 33034---0 TIMBER RIDGE UNIT TWO LOT 33U76850001607 OAK MARSH LLC PO BOX 343529FLORIDA CITY, FL 33034---0 TIMBER RIDGE UNIT TWO LOT 34U76850001623 OAK MARSH LLC PO BOX 343529FLORIDA CITY, FL 33034---0 TIMBER RIDGE UNIT TWO LOT 35U76850001649 OAK MARSH LLC PO BOX 343529FLORIDA CITY, FL 33034---0 TIMBER RIDGE UNIT TWO LOT 36U76850001665 OAK MARSH LLC PO BOX 343529FLORIDA CITY, FL 33034---0 TIMBER RIDGE UNIT TWO LOT 37U76850001681 OAK MARSH LLC PO BOX 343529FLORIDA CITY, FL 33034---0 TIMBER RIDGE UNIT TWO LOT 38U76850001704 OAK MARSH LLC PO BOX 343529FLORIDA CITY, FL 33034---0 TIMBER RIDGE UNIT TWO LOT 39U76850001720 OAK MARSH LLC PO BOX 343529FLORIDA CITY, FL 33034---0 TIMBER RIDGE UNIT TWO LOT 40U76850001746 OAK MARSH LLC PO BOX 343529FLORIDA CITY, FL 33034---0 TIMBER RIDGE UNIT TWO LOT 41U76850001762 OAK MARSH LLC PO BOX 343529FLORIDA CITY, FL 33034---0 TIMBER RIDGE UNIT TWO LOT 42U76850001788 OAK MARSH LLC PO BOX 343529FLORIDA CITY, FL 33034---0 TIMBER RIDGE UNIT TWO LOT 43U76850001801 OAK MARSH LLC PO BOX 343529FLORIDA CITY, FL 33034---0 TIMBER RIDGE UNIT TWO LOT 44U76850001827 OAK MARSH LLC PO BOX 343529FLORIDA CITY, FL 33034---0 TIMBER RIDGE UNIT TWO LOT 45U76850001908 OAK MARSH LLC PO BOX 343529FLORIDA CITY, FL 33034---0 TIMBER RIDGE UNIT TWO LOT 49U76850001924 OAK MARSH LLC PO BOX 343529FLORIDA CITY, FL 33034---0 TIMBER RIDGE UNIT TWO LOT 50U76850001940 OAK MARSH LLC PO BOX 343529FLORIDA CITY, FL 33034---0 TIMBER RIDGE UNIT TWO LOT 51U76850001966 OAK MARSH LLC PO BOX 343529FLORIDA CITY, FL 33034---0 TIMBER RIDGE UNIT TWO LOT 52U76850001982 OAK MARSH LLC PO BOX 343529FLORIDA CITY, FL 33034---0 TIMBER RIDGE UNIT TWO LOT 53U76850002004 OAK MARSH LLC PO BOX 343529FLORIDA CITY, FL 33034---0 TIMBER RIDGE UNIT TWO LOT 54U76850002020 OAK MARSH LLC PO BOX 343529FLORIDA CITY, FL 33034---0 TIMBER RIDGE UNIT TWO LOT 55U76850002046 OAK MARSH LLC PO BOX 343529FLORIDA CITY, FL 33034---0 TIMBER RIDGE UNIT TWO LOT 56U76850002062 OAK MARSH LLC PO BOX 343529FLORIDA CITY, FL 33034---0 TIMBER RIDGE UNIT TWO LOT 57U76850002088 OAK MARSH LLC PO BOX 343529FLORIDA CITY, FL 33034---0 TIMBER RIDGE UNIT TWO LOT 58U76850002101 OAK MARSH LLC PO BOX 343529FLORIDA CITY, FL 33034---0 TIMBER RIDGE UNIT TWO LOT 59U52658001205 OCANAS JR, ARMANDO 1235 FRIENDSHIP WAYIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---0 JUBILATION LOT 29U69060000764 OCANAS JR, ARMANDO LISSET LEON 1235 FRIENDSHIP WAY IMMOKALEE, FL 34142---0 REFLECTIONS AT JUBILATION A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 54 UNIT 6U55649000348 OCTAVE, JEAN BONHEUR LUCIDE OCTAVE 3536 LIBERTY WAYIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---2329 LIBERTY LANDING LOT 5U55649000623 OLVERA, JOSE ANGEL NORA BEATRIZ ARRIAGA 3592 LIBERTY WAYIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---0 LIBERTY LANDING LOT 19U55649003109 ORPHEE, YVROSE 3865 JUSTICE CIRCLEIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---0 LIBERTY LANDING LOT 143U55649001363 ORTIZ, ALFREDO MANUEL VEGA MARIA ELENA ARREOLA DE-VEGA 3748 JUSTICE CIRIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---2323 LIBERTY LANDING LOT 56U55649001208 ORTIZ, LEONARDO HERNANDEZ BLANEY HERNANDEZ 3716 JUSTICE CIRIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---2323 LIBERTY LANDING LOT 48U69060000421 OSORINO, SANTOS LUIS FRANCISCO GARCIA EDITH YVONNE WALKER GABRIEL ANGEL GARCIA 17906 COYOTE LN ANDERSON, CA 96007---0 REFLECTIONS AT JUBILATION A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 52 UNIT 5U69060000489 OSORNIO ET AL, SANTOS % LUIS F GARCIA GRDN 1325 REFLECTIONS WAY #52 8 IMMOKALEE, FL 34142---2262 REFLECTIONS AT JUBILATION A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 52 UNIT 8U69060000162 OSORNIO, SANTOS LUIS FRANCISCO GARCIA EDITH YVONNE WALKER GABRIEL ANGEL GARCIA 17906 COYOTE LN ANDERSON, CA 96007---0 REFLECTIONS AT JUBILATION A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 50 UNIT 8U55649002786 PANIAGUE, SAUVEUR ROSE MADIANIE PIERRE-PAUL 3771 JUSTICE CIRIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---2323 LIBERTY LANDING LOT 127U55649002184 PARKER, KNORSHEEKA KIERA D 3611 JUSTICE CIRCLEIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---0 LIBERTY LANDING LOT 97U25578000180 PARRA, FRANCISCO & MARCELINA PO BOX 5364IMMOKALEE, FL 34143---5364 CARSON ROAD MOBILE HOME SUBDIVISION LOT 3U55649001583 PAUL, MARIE JEAN 3792 JUSTICE CIRIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---2323 LIBERTY LANDING LOT 67U55649000869 PENALOZA, JOSE M & ARACELY PO BOX 3051IMMOKALEE, FL 34143---3051 LIBERTY LANDING LOT 31U22430012727 PEREZ, ALVARO SALAZAR FRANCISCO JAVIER SALAZAR PO BOX 334IMMOKALEE, FL 34143---0 ARROWHEAD RESERVE AT LAKE TRAFFORD PHASE TWO BLK D LOT 106 U22430009044 PEREZ, PHILLIP A ASHLEY ROSALES 1125 BUSH ST EIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---2620 ARROWHEAD RESERVE AT LAKE TRAFFORD PHASE ONE BLK A LOT 39 U69060000748 PEREZ, STEPHEN 1305 REFLECTIONS WAY UNIT 5IMMOKALEE, FL 34142---2234 REFLECTIONS AT JUBILATION A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 54 UNIT 5U69060000722 PIB TRUST 720 GOODLETTE RD N STE 304NAPLES, FL 34102---5656 REFLECTIONS AT JUBILATION A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 54 UNIT 4U22430008744 PIERRE, DIEUDONNE JACQUECILIA PIERRE LENIS 1134 BUSH ST EIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---2612 ARROWHEAD RESERVE AT LAKE TRAFFORD PHASE ONE BLK A LOT 24 U52658000840 PIERRE, DIEUTAFAIT MARIE J EUGENE 1125 SERENITY LNIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---0 JUBILATION LOT 11U69060000609 PIERRE, DIEUTAFAIT MARIE JUNIE EUGENE 1125 SERENITY LNIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---0 REFLECTIONS AT JUBILATION A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 53 UNIT 6U22430009264 PIERRE, GERARD & GENISE 1187 BUSH ST EIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---0 ARROWHEAD RESERVE AT LAKE TRAFFORD PHASE ONE BLK A LOT 50 U55649003086 PIERRE, JOSEPH J DENISE PIERRE CELICOURT 3861 JUSTICE CIR PO BOX 1429 IMMOKALEE, FL 34143---1429 LIBERTY LANDING LOT 142U55649001046 PIERRE, KENOLD & MARIE G 3684 JUSTICE CIRIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---2315 LIBERTY LANDING LOT 40U55649001525 PIERRE, LONEVE ROSE B SEPPE 3780 JUSTICE CIRCLE IMMOKALEE, FL 34142---0 LIBERTY LANDING LOT 64U22430008760 PIERRE, MARIE ROSE 1130 BUSH ST EIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---2612 ARROWHEAD RESERVE AT LAKE TRAFFORD PHASE ONE BLK A LOT 25 U55649001389 PIERRE-PAUL, FRANCOIS 3752 JUSTICE CIRIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---2323 LIBERTY LANDING LOT 57U55649002427 PLANTIN, LEONEL & MARIE A 3659 JUSTICE CIRIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---2316 LIBERTY LANDING LOT 109U55649000487 PREVILUS, JOSEPH E & MARIE R 3564 LIBERTY WAYIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---2329 LIBERTY LANDING LOT 12U55649002443 PRIME, CARMETA PO BOX 2651IMMOKALEE, FL 34143---2651 LIBERTY LANDING LOT 110U52658001085 QUINTERO, JOSE CONCEPCION RENTERIA PALOMARES 1159 SERENITY WAYAVE MARIA, FL 34142---0 JUBILATION LOT 23U69060000049 RAHMAN, MIZANUR PO BOX 2194IMMOKALEE, FL 34143---0 REFLECTIONS AT JUBILATION A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 50 UNIT 2U69060000269 RAHMAN, MIZANUR PO BOX 2194IMMOKALEE, FL 34143---0 REFLECTIONS AT JUBILATION A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 51 UNIT 5U00071120003 RAMIREZ, FELIPE ISABEL CRISTINA RAMIREZ 3513 WESTCLOX STIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---2031 31 46 29 COM AT NW CNR OF NE1/4, E 410FT TO POB, E 190FT, S 440FT, W 190FT, N 440FT TO POB, LESS E 95FT .96 U00072840007 RAMIREZ, FELIPE ISABEL CRISTINA RAMIREZ 3513 WESTCLOX STIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---2031 31 46 29 COM NW CRN OF NE1/4 SEC RUN E 210FT FOR POB, E 200FT, S 440FT, W 200FT, N 440FT TO POB 2.02 AC OR 1042 U69060000065 RAMIREZ, JUAN PO BOX 733IMMOKALEE, FL 34143---733 REFLECTIONS AT JUBILATION A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 50 UNIT 3U69060000081 RAMIREZ, JUAN PO BOX 733IMMOKALEE, FL 34143---733 REFLECTIONS AT JUBILATION A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 50 UNIT 4U69060000243 RAMIREZ, JUAN PO BOX 733IMMOKALEE, FL 34143---733 REFLECTIONS AT JUBILATION A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 51 UNIT 4U69060000366 RAMIREZ, JUAN PO BOX 733IMMOKALEE, FL 34143---733 REFLECTIONS AT JUBILATION A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 52 UNIT 2UPOList_1000_PL20200001827.xls9.A.1.ePacket Pg. 329Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) 569060000502 RAMIREZ, JUAN PO BOX 733IMMOKALEE, FL 34143---733 REFLECTIONS AT JUBILATION A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 53 UNIT 1U55649002249 RAMIREZ, OSCAR A GOMEZ MYRA GOMEZ RAMIREZ 3623 JUSTICE CIRIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---0 LIBERTY LANDING LOT 100U69060000560 RAMOS-SORIANO, ANTONIO 1315 REFLECTIONS WAY UNIT 4IMMOKALEE, FL 34142---2261 REFLECTIONS AT JUBILATION A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 53 UNIT 4U69060000706 REDLANDS CHRISTIAN M ASSOC INC 402 W MAIN STIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---3933 REFLECTIONS AT JUBILATION A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 54 UNIT 3U69060000104 REFLECTIONS AT JUBILATION INC % GOLDEN PROPERTY MGMT SVCS 4099 TAMIAMI TRAIL N #403 NAPLES, FL 34103---0 REFLECTIONS AT JUBILATION A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 50 UNIT 5U69060000528 REFLECTIONS AT JUBILATION INC 12811 KENWOOD LN #103FT MYERS, FL 33907---0 REFLECTIONS AT JUBILATION A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 53 UNIT 2U69060000382 REFLECTIONS AT JUBILATION INC GOLDEN PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LLC 4099 TAMIAMI TRAIL N #403 NAPLES, FL 34103---0 REFLECTIONS AT JUBILATION A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 52 UNIT 3U55649002304 REGIS, DJENIE 3635 JUSTICE CIRIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---2316 LIBERTY LANDING LOT 103U55649002223 RESENDIZ, ELOY IVAN MARCELINA RESENDIZ 3619 JUSTICE CIRIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---2316 LIBERTY LANDING LOT 99U52658000743 RESENDIZ, FROYLAN RESENDIZ, MARIA DEL CARMEN G 1102 SERENITY WAYIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---2192 JUBILATION LOT 6U22430009824 REYES, JOSE ADONIS REYES KARIN E DUBON AJTZAC 1703 7TH AVEIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---0 ARROWHEAD RESERVE AT LAKE TRAFFORD PHASE ONE BLK A LOT 78 U55649001088 RINCHER, GLADYS 3692 JUSTICE CIRIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---2315 LIBERTY LANDING LOT 42U22430012688 RINCON, SIMITRIO MARIA DOLORES RINCON JOSE ROSENDO RINCON P O BOX 3013 IMMOKALEE, FL 34143---0 ARROWHEAD RESERVE AT LAKE TRAFFORD PHASE TWO BLK D LOT 104 U69060000308 RIOS, MATIAS & JANET 1328 REFLECTIONS LN UNIT 7IMMOKALEE, FL 34142---2226 REFLECTIONS AT JUBILATION A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 51 UNIT 7U22430009620 RIOS, TAVIS & JACQUELINE 1237 MADISON CTIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---2624 ARROWHEAD RESERVE AT LAKE TRAFFORD PHASE ONE BLK A LOT 68 U55649000982 ROCHER, MARIE MARLENE 3668 JUSTICE CIRIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---2315 LIBERTY LANDING LOT 37U00079120005 RODRIGUEZ, DIOMAR SAMUEL RODRIGUEZ PO BOX 703IMMOKALEE, FL 34143---703 32 46 29 S 150FT OF FOLLOWING: E1/2 OF W1/2 OF W1/2 OF NW1/4 OF SW1/4 LESS S 960FT U55649002883 RODRIGUEZ, J JESUS BUSTAMANTE MARIA S BUSTAMANTE 3791 JUSTICE CIRIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---2323 LIBERTY LANDING LOT 132U00079600004 RODRIGUEZ, MARIA OLGA JUAN RODRIGUEZ SOFIA CONDE RODRIGUEZ 1030 N 29TH ST IMMOKALEE, FL 34142---2640 32 46 29 W1/2 OF W1/2 OF W1/2 OF NW1/4 OF SW1/4 LESS S 960FT LESS NLY PORTION SR RW 2249 U22430008362 RUIZ, ROCIO 1214 BUSH ST EIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---2622 ARROWHEAD RESERVE AT LAKE TRAFFORD PHASE ONE BLK A LOT 5U22430009086 SAINCY, MONIQUE YFTO MAYETTE 1133 BUSH ST EIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---2620 ARROWHEAD RESERVE AT LAKE TRAFFORD PHASE ONE BLK A LOT 41 U22430009426 SALAZAR, ALVARO 1228 MADISON COURTIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---0 ARROWHEAD RESERVE AT LAKE TRAFFORD PHASE ONE BLK A LOT 58 U22430009484 SALAZAR, ALVARO 1228 MADISON CTIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---0 ARROWHEAD RESERVE AT LAKE TRAFFORD PHASE ONE BLK A LOT 61 U22430009141 SALAZAR, FRANCISCO J PO BOX 334IMMOKALEE, FL 34143---334 ARROWHEAD RESERVE AT LAKE TRAFFORD PHASE ONE BLK A LOT 44 U22430009329 SALAZAR, FRANCISCO J PO BOX 334IMMOKALEE, FL 34143---334 ARROWHEAD RESERVE AT LAKE TRAFFORD PHASE ONE BLK A LOT 53 U52658001124 SALAZAR, MA G 1167 SERENITY WAYIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---0 JUBILATION LOT 25U22430008304 SALAZAR, RAUDEL PO BOX 425IMMOKALEE, FL 34143---0 ARROWHEAD RESERVE AT LAKE TRAFFORD PHASE ONE BLK A LOT 2U22430012743 SALAZAR, ROBERTO C 1316 LINCOLN CTIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---0 ARROWHEAD RESERVE AT LAKE TRAFFORD PHASE TWO BLK D LOT 107 U22430012701 SALISBURY, WILLIAM L 1000 ALACHUA STIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---3542 ARROWHEAD RESERVE AT LAKE TRAFFORD PHASE TWO BLK D LOT 105 U22430009387 SANCHEZ, GREGORIO & MARIA 1220 MADISON CTIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---2624 ARROWHEAD RESERVE AT LAKE TRAFFORD PHASE ONE BLK A LOT 56 U00072280007 SANCHEZ-AGUIRRE, STEFANI PO BOX 761IMMOKALEE, FL 34143---0 31 46 29 BEG NE CNR N1/2 OF SE1/4 OF NE1/4 OF NE1/4 RUN S75FT TO POB, CONT S90 FT, W180FT, N90FT, E180FT TO POB, U55649002508 SANON, FAVINEL & FANETTE 3691 JUSTICE CIRIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---2316 LIBERTY LANDING LOT 113U52658000701 SAUCEDO, JOSE VICTOR FIGUEROA 1107 SERENITY WAYIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---0 JUBILATION LOT 4U00071920009 SCHOOL DISTRICT-LTE LAKE TRAFFORD ELEMENTARY % SUPERINTENDENT 5775 OSCEOLA TRL NAPLES, FL 34109---919 31 46 29 BEG NW COR SEC., S 2656.38FT, E 1352.89FT, N 40.06 TO POB, E 660FT, N 990FT, W 660FT, S 990FT POB U22430008605 SEBASTIAN, TOMAS 1162 BUSH ST EIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---2612 ARROWHEAD RESERVE AT LAKE TRAFFORD PHASE ONE BLK A LOT 17 U55649000746 SENAT, JONEL & MICHELINE 3620 JUSTICE CIRIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---0 LIBERTY LANDING LOT 25U22430009222 SIERRA, MARIA PO BOX 1782IMMOKALEE, FL 34143---1782 ARROWHEAD RESERVE AT LAKE TRAFFORD PHASE ONE BLK A LOT 48 U25578000148 SILVA, MIGUEL ANGEL PO BOX 5311IMMOKALEE, FL 34143---0 CARSON ROAD MOBILE HOME SUBDIVISION LOT 1U25578000164 SILVA, MIGUEL ANGEL PO BOX 5311IMMOKALEE, FL 34143---0 CARSON ROAD MOBILE HOME SUBDIVISION LOT 2U55649003060 SMITH, WILLIE A 3857 JUSTICE CIRIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---2325 LIBERTY LANDING LOT 141U52658000905 SOLIS, JUAN M MARIN 1137 SERENITY LNIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---2193 JUBILATION LOT 14U30680520006 SOTO, ANTONIA H 1401 AVOCADO STIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---2124 EDEN PARK PART LOT H DESC AS:BEG NW CNR SEC 32, RUN E30FT, S330FT, E100FT, S 210FT TO POB, S95.19FT, EU00080600006 SOTO, GUADALUPE PO BOX 1456IMMOKALEE, FL 34143---1456 32 46 29 S 75FT OF N 160FT OF N 320FT OF S 640FT OF W1/2 OF W1/2 OF W1/2 OF NW1/4 OF SW1/4 .28 OR 950 PG 1195 U00075880006 SOTO, IGNACIO MARIA DEL CARMEN R SOTO 1011 N 29TH STIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---2639 32 46 29 N 160FT OF S 480FT OF W1/2 OF W1/2 OF W1/2 OF NW1/4 OF SW1/4 .60 AC OR 1357 PG 283 U00075920005 SOTO, IGNACIO & CARMEN 1011 N 29TH STIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---2639 32 46 29 S1/2 OF N640FT OF S 960FT OF E1/2 OF W1/2 OF W1/2 OF NW1/4 OF SW1/4 U00075720001 SUMMER GLEN OF IMMOKALEE LTD 7865 SOUTHSIDE BLVDJACKSONVILLE, FL 32256---416 32 46 29 E 165FT OF S 660FT OF W1/2 OF E1/2 OF NW1/4 OF SW1/4 , W1/2 OF W1/2 OF E1/2 OF NW1/4 OF SW1/4 LESS OR 1762 U52658000785 SWEET BABY POPS 1110 SERENITY WAYIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---0 JUBILATION LOT 8U22430008786 SYLVESTRE, FRANTZ & MYRTHA 1126 BUSH ST EIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---2612 ARROWHEAD RESERVE AT LAKE TRAFFORD PHASE ONE BLK A LOT 26 U69060000780 SZILAGYI, SHARI 1305 REFLECTIONS WAY #7IMMOKALEE, FL 34142---0 REFLECTIONS AT JUBILATION A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 54 UNIT 7U22430008647 THELISMA, CLARISSE M 1154 BUSH ST EIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---2612 ARROWHEAD RESERVE AT LAKE TRAFFORD PHASE ONE BLK A LOT 19 U52658000769 THERESIAS, CHESLENE PO BOX 1932IMMOKALEE, FL 34143---0 JUBILATION LOT 7U76850001403 TIMBER RIDGE OF IMMOKALEE LTD 2449 SANDERS PINE CIRIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---2101 TIMBER RIDGE UNIT TWO TRACT R (ROAD R/W)U55649001143 TIRA, JEAN H FLEURILIA SENATUS 3704 JUSTICE CIRIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---0 LIBERTY LANDING LOT 45U55649003125 TORRES JR, ANGEL RAFAEL MILLY GRACE FIGUEROA IRIZARRY 3869 JUSTICE CIRIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---0 LIBERTY LANDING LOT 144U55649001622 TORRES, JANIXSA LYNN 3800 JUSTICE CIRCLEIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---0 LIBERTY LANDING LOT 69U69060000447 TREJO, YARELI CELIA TREJO 1325 REFLECTIONS WAY UNIT 6 IMMOKALEE, FL 34142---2262 REFLECTIONS AT JUBILATION A CONDOMINIUM BLDG 52 UNIT 6U69060000625 ULYSSE, ROBERT CELIANE HAUBORG JOSEPH 1315 REFLECTIONS WAY UNIT 7 IMMOKALEE, FL 34142---2261 REFLECTIONS AT JUBILATIONA CONDOMINIUM BLDG 53 UNIT 7U22430009963 VARGAS, JUAN VARGAS NICOLASA PABLO JERONIMO 1286 ADAMS COURTIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---0 ARROWHEAD RESERVE AT LAKE TRAFFORD PHASE ONE BLK A LOT 85 U55649001486 VASALLO, ANAY PERAZA 3772 JUSTICE CIRIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---0 LIBERTY LANDING LOT 62U00072760006 VASQUEZ, SAUL MATILDE ALONSO PO BOX 1065IMMOKALEE, FL 34143---0 31 46 29 N1/2 OF SE1/4 OF NE1/4 OF NE1/4, EXC N 165FT, LESS R/W, LESS W 125FT U00075960007 VAZQUEZ, ROBERTO GARCIA ROSA MARIA VILLA DE GARCIA PO BOX 2026IMMOKALEE, FL 34143---2026 32 46 29 N1/2 OF N640FT OF S960FT OF E1/2 OF W1/2 OF W1/2 OF NW1/4 OF SW1/4 U55649002728 VEGA, JOSE G GOMEZ MARGARITA ORTIZ DE GOMEZ 3759 JUSTICE CIRIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---2323 LIBERTY LANDING LOT 124U22430010046 VENEGAS, JUAN CARLOS MUNOZ 1291 ADAMS CTIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---0 ARROWHEAD RESERVE AT LAKE TRAFFORD PHASE ONE BLK A LOT 89 U55649000267 VERA, ELIAS BUSTAMANTE MARIA D BUSTAMANTE PO BOX 1218IMMOKALEE, FL 34143---1218 LIBERTY LANDING LOT 1U55649002922 VERA, JAVIER GONZALEZ 3799 JUSTICE CIRIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---2323 LIBERTY LANDING LOT 134U22430009167 VERA, MARIA DOLORES FLOR 1149 BUSH ST EIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---0 ARROWHEAD RESERVE AT LAKE TRAFFORD PHASE ONE BLK A LOT 45 U55649000568 VERA, MIGUEL V & MARIA E 3580 LIBERTY WAYIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---2329 LIBERTY LANDING LOT 16U22430009947 VIDAURRI, JOSE CRUZ SR 1282 ADAMS CTIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---2626 ARROWHEAD RESERVE AT LAKE TRAFFORD PHASE ONE BLK A LOT 84 U22430009206 VILLA, MELANIE ROSE & DIEGO A 1161 BUSH STREET EASTIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---0 ARROWHEAD RESERVE AT LAKE TRAFFORD PHASE ONE BLK A LOT 47 U55649000584 VILLEDA, FLORENTINO AURELIA PEREZ VILLEDA 3584 LIBERTY WAYIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---2329 LIBERTY LANDING LOT 17U55649000649 VILLEGAS, MARIA T 3596 LIBERTY WAYIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---0 LIBERTY LANDING LOT 20U22430008469 VILLEGAS, ROCIO 1192 BUSH ST EIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---2612 ARROWHEAD RESERVE AT LAKE TRAFFORD PHASE ONE BLK A LOT 10 U22430009303 VILSAINT, JEAN N PO BOX 1904IMMOKALEE, FL 34143---1904 ARROWHEAD RESERVE AT LAKE TRAFFORD PHASE ONE BLK A LOT 52 U55649000283 VILSAINT, MARISE L PO BOX 1904IMMOKALEE, FL 34143---1904 LIBERTY LANDING LOT 2U55649000322 WILDER, ANGELA YVETTE 3532 LIBERTY WAYIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---2329 LIBERTY LANDING LOT 4U22430010169 WILLIAMS, JACKIE LOUISE WILLIAMS 1259 ADAMS CTIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---2627 ARROWHEAD RESERVE AT LAKE TRAFFORD PHASE ONE BLK A LOT 95 U55649001541 ZAPATA, FLORINDA MENDEZ 3784 JUSTICE CIRIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---2323 LIBERTY LANDING LOT 65U55649001282 ZARAGOZA, IGNACIO MARIA ZARAGOZA BENITEZ 3732 JUSTICE CIRIMMOKALEE, FL 34142---2323 LIBERTY LANDING LOT 52U52658000028 REFERENCE ONLY REFLECTIONS AT JUBILATION A CONDOMINIUMJUBILATION TRACT A, NKA REFLECTIONS AT JUBILATION A CONDOMINIUM AS DESC IN OR 3096 PG 1629 NPOList_1000_PL20200001827.xls9.A.1.ePacket Pg. 330Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) ND-GCI0606570-01 NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING Petition PL20200001827,RCMA Immokalee MPUD Rezone (PUDZ) A Neighborhood Information Meeting hosted by D.Wa yne Arnold, AICP,of Q.Grady Minor and Associates,P.A.,representing Redlands Christian Migrant Association,Inc.(Applicant)will be held on March 30,2021,6:00 pm at the Immokalee Charter School,123 N. 4th Street,Immokalee,FL 34142.Individuals who would like to participate remotely or have questions or comments should contact Sharon Umpenhour,Senior Planning Te chnician with Q.Grady Minor & Associates,P.A.by email:sumpenhour@gradyminor.com,phone:239- 947-1144,or mail:3800 Via Del Rey,Bonita Springs,FL 34134.Project information is posted online at www.gradyminor.com/planning. Redlands Christian Migrant Association,Inc.submitted a formal application to Collier County,seeking approval of a Mixed Use Planned Unit Development (MPUD)Rezone.The MPUD rezone proposes to rezone the property from the Agricultural (A)Zoning District with a We llfield Risk Management Special Tr eatment Overlay Zone W-1 through W-4 (ST/W-1 thru ST/W-4)to the RCMA Immokalee MPUD Zoning District to allow a 700 student K-8 Charter School,a 250-student pre-school,160 multi-family dwelling units,which may include market rate,essential service and/or affordable housing units,and 5,000 square feet of Intermediate Commercial (C-3)uses and associated accessory uses.Access to the educational campus and housing will be from Lake Tr afford Road,with a separate access to Carson Road to serve the small commercially designated tract. The subject property is comprised of 62.2±acres,located on the northwest corner of Lake Tr afford Road and Carson Road Section 31, To wnship 46 South,Range 29 East,Collier County,Florida. The Neighborhood Information Meeting is for informational purposes, it is not a public hearing. 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 331 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 332 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) First Name Last Name Email Registration Time Approval Status AddressCharlie Martin cmartin@bbchi.com 3/16/2021 7:56approved 927 US Hwy 301 SouthOscar Bigelow obigelow@bbchi.com 3/17/2021 9:12approved Handy Food Stores,   927 US Hwy 301 South Tampa,  Fl 336199.A.1.ePacket Pg. 333Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee Petition PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee Mixed Use Planned Unit Development (MPUD) March 30, 2021 Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 334 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA •Redlands Christian Migrant Association, Inc.–Applicant •D. Wayne Arnold, AICP, Professional Planner –Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. •Michael Delate, P.E., Civil Engineer –Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. •James M. Banks, P.E., Traffic Engineer –Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA •Marco A. Espinar, Biologist –Collier Environmental Consultants, Inc. 2 Project Team 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 335 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA 3 Location Map 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 336 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Current Zoning:Agricultural (A) with a Wellfield Risk Management Special Treatment Overlay Zone W-1 through W-4 (ST/W-1 thru ST/W-4) Proposed Zoning:RCMA Immokalee Mixed Use Planned Unit Development (MPUD) Existing Future Land Use:High Residential Subdistrict and Commerce Center-Mixed Use Subdistrict (Immokalee Area Master Plan) Project Acreage:62.2+/-acres 4 Project Information 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 337 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA •Rezone from the Agricultural (A) Zoning District with a Wellfield Risk Management Special Treatment Overlay Zone W-1 through W-4 (ST/W-1 thru ST/W-4) to a Mixed Use Planned Unit Development (MPUD) to allow a maximum of 700 student K-8 Charter School, a 250- student pre-school, 160 multi-family dwelling units, which may include market rate, essential service and/or affordable housing units, and 5,000 square feet of Intermediate Commercial (C-3) uses and associated accessory uses. 5 Proposed Request 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 338 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA 6 Proposed MPUD Permitted Uses Community Facility Tract: 1.Childcare centers (8351) 2.Community centers 3.Parks and playgrounds,indoor/outdoor recreation facilities,open space uses 4.Schools,private and parochial schools (8211) Residential Tract: 1.Dwelling Units:Multi-Family 2.Model homes /model sales or leasing offices Commercial Tract: 1.All permitted and conditional uses in the C-1 through C-3 Zoning Districts of the Collier County Land Development Code (LDC),Ordinance 04-41,as amended. 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 339 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA 7 Proposed Master Plan 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 340 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA 8 Proposed Development Standards 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 341 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA 9 Proposed Deviations from the LDC 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 342 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA 10 Conclusion Documents and information can be found online: •Gradyminor.com/Planning •Collier County GMD Public Portal: cvportal.colliergov.net/cityviewweb Next Steps •Hearing sign(s) posted on property advertising Planning Commission (CCPC) and Board of County Commissioner (BCC) hearing dates. •CCPC –TBD •BCC -TBD Contact: •Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A.: Sharon Umpenhour, Senior Planning Technician; sumpenhour@gradyminor.com or 239.947.1144 extension 1249 •Collier County:Timothy Finn, AICP, Principal Planner; Timothy.Finn@colliercountyfl.gov or 239.252.4312 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 343 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Transcript March 30, 2021 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ (PL20200001827) NIM Page 1 of 9 Wayne Arnold: Good evening, everybody. My name is Wayne Arnold, and I'm a professional planner with Q. Grady Minor and Associates. We're representing RCMA, and those of you who are on Zoom – it looks like there are three of you – and making sure that you can hear me fine, speaking this – okay, thanks for the nod. Appreciate that. So, I'm Wayne Arnold. I'm going to introduce a few people. We're required to create an audio and a transcript of this meeting for Collier County. So, Sharon Umpenhour, from Grady Minor, will be recording the meeting. We have a biologist in the room that's working on the project, Marco Espinar. We have Mike Delate, a professional engineer from our office. We have Jim Banks, a professional traffic engineer, and Laura De John representing Collier County government, and we have Mike Facundo, RCMA, and several representatives of RCMA in the room, in case there are any specific questions that we can't field. So, we're here tonight for a required neighborhood information meeting. The county requires we hold these after we receive our first round of review comments for zoning cases. So, we've sent out public notice for that, and we're conducting the meeting tonight. Our next step in the process will be continuing through the review process with county government, and we'll ultimately be scheduled for a planning commission meeting, as well as a public hearing before the Board of county commission for final approval sometime in the future. There are no dates yet established. So, the location exhibit, we have on the screen is the 62-acre property. It's currently undeveloped. As you can see, it's a former ag field. It is adjacent to… sorry, it showed on my computer screen but not your screen. So, the former farm field, there are a couple of areas of native vegetation onsite. One in the southwest corner is likely to be retained as part of our native vegetation requirement. And we have a small parcel, a finger that goes out to Carson Road, which is north of the Handy store, and we're designating that as a commercial tract on our master plan with no internal access to the community that we're proposing. So, the current zoning on the site is agriculture. There are some wellfield protection zone overlays that are on the site. They're not prohibitive; they are just restrictions on the land development code to talk about how we store and contain certain materials, but I don’t think there are any of those associated with what we're proposing to do here. 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 344 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) Transcript March 30, 2021 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ (PL20200001827) NIM Page 2 of 9 From a future land-use standpoint, the high residential sub-district as well as the commerce center mixed use for the commercial tract. And again, we're a little over 62 acres in size. So, we're proposing to rezone the property to allow a mixed-use plan development, and we're proposing to allow a 700-student K through 8 charter school. We're proposing to allow a 250-student preschool. We have a residential tract to accommodate up to 160 multi-family units, and then, the small parcel that we have that’s designated commercial – is about 0.44 acres, and we're asking for C-3 type commercial uses not to exceed 5,000 total square feet on that property. So, the proposed uses that we're seeking, we've broken this up into a community facility tract which would allow for the childcare, the private school, community centers, parks and playgrounds with recreational amenities. And then, we have the residential tract, and then, on the commercial, as I mentioned, we're asking for all permitted uses in the C1 through C3 commercial district. I don’t think RCMA has any immediate plans to develop the commercial tract, but it's part of the assemblage that they're acquiring, so we're including that as a small commercial tract. This is our proposed master plan. You can see that we have access points proposed on Lake Trafford Road. A couple locations, we've identified, but the most central one is a potential event parking. There's an opportunity, potentially, for the school to partner with Collier County, and there could potentially be a soccer field or something that could be co-used between the public and RCMA. So, we made potential access for that. We're not accessing Curry Street, and the only access over to Carson is for the small commercial tract. Our residential tract is in the northwest corner of the site. And then, you can see our preservation tract. This plan is very conceptual. The school's working with their architect to try to refine this a little further, trying to identify some of the internal circulation. I know that county staff has asked about that, so we're gonna try to better define that. So, if you're on this call and receive notice, you can follow along with our proposed changes as they occur through the review process, either on the Grady Minor planning website, or you can contact Collier County government and Laura De John, or one of the other people can certainly get you the latest information. Or certainly, you can email Sharon Umpenhour in our office, and we'll be happy to get you all of that information. So, we also, as part of this process, we're developing development 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 345 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) Transcript March 30, 2021 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ (PL20200001827) NIM Page 3 of 9 standards for the property, so we have separate development standards for the multi-family building, for our amenity areas, for the commercial tract, and then, as well as the community facility that have the preschool and the K through 8 charter school on. I'm not going to go through all of those development standards, but this is a requirement as part of our zoning change. So, this is just sort of – we're asking for a couple of deviations here. One, we want the ability to put chain-link fence forward of a principal structure. It's not clear whether or not the charter school would be permitted the exception that's granted for other schools for chain-link, so we're asking for that deviation, and we're asking for that to be up to 15 feet in height, in case we do have play fields that are across from Lake Trafford Road contain errant soccer balls and play balls. So, those are the two deviations from the code that we're asking for today. There could be others that come about as they continue to review from staff, but those are the only two that we've identified to date. And in conclusion, we again, we can see all this information through the public portals. We will have a planning commission date. We will have a board of county commissioner date. Those dates have yet to be established. When they are, there will be mailed notices sent out to surrounding property-owners from Collier County government. There will be signs posted on the property, with the hearing dates. And then, Sharon's contact information is at the bottom of the screen, as is Tim Finn. He's our planner. Laura De John is filling in for him tonight, but Tim Finn is with Collier County. He's assigned to our case. So, with that, I'm going to turn it over to questions from the public, or those of you who are on the Zoom. So, we want to take people in the audience, if anybody has questions. Yes, sir. Can you state your name? Max Griffi: Who's the housing going to be for? This gonna be migrants, or would it be for anybody, or…? Wayne: The question was, who's the housing going to be for? And I don’t think that they have any contractual obligations with anybody yet. They’ve spoken to a developer that has other units in Immokalee. We've set this up so that it's not just for an affordable housing project. We've advertised that it can be for market-rate or for essential service personnel, because we just don’t know at this point 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 346 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) Transcript March 30, 2021 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ (PL20200001827) NIM Page 4 of 9 what form it will take. I wish I had more information, but we just really don’t at this point. The focus has been on trying to get RCMA relocated to their campus. Max: Will it be based on income? Wayne: The question is, will rent be based on income? And I don’t know. Market rate would just be whatever the market dictates. The county, if we become affordable housing units, then they would be subject to certain income parameters that the county establishes, but we're not asking for an affordable housing density bonus. The density we've asked for is achievable under the current comprehensive plan density guidelines. Any other questions? Ma’am, I know you're with the public. Do you have any questions? Maria Sierra: I do. I live across the street, in Arrowhead, and my main concern is because Lake Traffic is just that two-lane. What is going to be the projection for that road to be widened? And I know that you're gonna have an exit on Carson Road extension, which the only other way out would be down to Westclox which takes you to 29, which runs into New Market. And there is no light there. There is gonna be – traffic is horrendous already. I want you to just picture this, because our roads are so narrow already, and not wide enough to support that much traffic in that area. What is the projection of the roads in that area? Wayne: So, we have a question from one of the members in the audience in attendance who lives across the street in Arrowhead, and she's questioning traffic patterns and whether or not there's access to a light, et cetera. So, I'm gonna let Jim Banks, our traffic engineer, come up and answer that question, so that those of you on Zoom can hear the response as well. Jim Banks: Hello, Jim Banks. The roads that you just mentioned, Lake Trafford Road, Carson Road, New Market, those are all county-maintained roads. So, they determine when those roads need to be widened. Currently, there is nothing on their five-year capital improvement program plan to widen Lake Trafford or Carson Road, or put a signal at Carson and New Market. Wayne: So, you’ve done the analysis – Max: You mean Westclox and New Market? 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 347 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) Transcript March 30, 2021 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ (PL20200001827) NIM Page 5 of 9 Jim: Yes. Maria: Then, because honestly, there aren't any turning lanes, really off of that road, off of Carson. Carson, how it runs on [inaudible], there are no turning lanes. [inaudible] taking a lot of traffic, because on the Guadalupe Center is actually building another preschool [inaudible], so I'm just thinking, how is there not any plans to widen that road, or even add turning lanes? Because within a year or so, when that is done, that's gonna be a large amount of traffic going through there, and then you add this. This is going to be – wouldn't this be projected to be done? Jim: Is what being projected – Maria: This whole project here, because I'm just calculating the traffic that's gonna be going into that particular section, and – Jim: Oh, okay. Well, let me address your traffic question, and I'll let Wayne talk about the timing. Again, those intersections and those roads that you brought up are under the jurisdiction of Collier County Department of Transportation. We don’t work for Collier County DOT. They monitor those intersections, and the roadways that [inaudible]. Your comment's on public record, so I'll be happy to pass that information on to Collier County for their consideration, but they're the ones that review those items and determine when those improvements would be made. Wayne: Can you just also address level of service, Jim, just speak a little louder Jim: Yes. Okay. So, currently, Lake Traffic Road is operating a level of service C, which is C as in Charlie, which is considered an acceptable level of service on Collier County standards. And it is projected to continue to be operating level service C to the year 2025 with this project being built. And Carson Road is actually at level of service B, as in boy, which is even a higher standard than what Lake Trafford operates on. Wayne: Thank you, Jim. So, those of you on Zoom, do any of you have any questions for us that we can answer? If you do, would you unmute yourself and go ahead and ask? Okay, I'm going to continue. One question that wasn’t answered – and Mike, maybe you can correct me if I'm wrong – but the timeframe for the school, we're obviously in the process to obtain the zoning entitlements. We're at some point going to start the hard engineering and 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 348 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) Transcript March 30, 2021 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ (PL20200001827) NIM Page 6 of 9 permitting process. I think the idea is for the school to at least get started sometime in probably early 2022 at this point, since we're already in 2021. So, I don't know what the build out – I don't know, Mike, if you want to try to talk about any of the phasing schedule, if you even know that. Mike Facundo: Well, there's no phasing schedule. Wayne: Why don’t you come up and have you on the… Mike Facundo: One of the things I think that we have, that would be good – all right, thank you, Wayne. Can you guys hear me? All right. Okay, cool. So, I know two things. I hear your frustration, and the concern, I could say, because that's exactly correct. And as I said on the local advisory CRA board, one of the things that we keep pushing is the traffic light right at New Market – and what is that? Westclox extension? – and 29. And what I was told is they're starting doing another study, and it's going to happen, which is going to help alleviate some of Lake Trafford traffic, so I hope that helps. But as part of the concept of this is that traffic as you said, and the roads are not failing, actually, it meets the requirements for the development. But as far as the phasing piece of it, the first phase is just going to be the childcare. So, what's gonna happen here is two existing facilities on this site that are going to go away. And they're gonna be – we're not adding kids, but we're going to replace the buildings that are here, because we know there is a parking situation off of this site path, so that's gonna help alleviate the problem we have here, by creating that over there. But the other two has not really been determined for what the build out will be. But it allows for the opportunity, if they RCMA for some reason – I don't know. I'm just thinking out loud, perhaps, instead – look, we want to really remove this piece and maybe sell it, or if partner with someone that would be able to do, then give them options. Because the truth is, guys, 62 acres is a big piece of property, and so, it was kinda one of those neat challenges, to say, what do we do? So, nothings been etched in stone, we felt, with the Grady Minor and the planners, and meeting the program, that this would be a great opportunity to meet the need that's out there. We're not into competing with anyone in the sense of creating certain housing for certain individuals, but an opportunity to be able to create some sort of market rate as Wayne just talked about, to be 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 349 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) Transcript March 30, 2021 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ (PL20200001827) NIM Page 7 of 9 able to – it is a big need. One of the things I know that schools and nurseries struggles with, is how do we bring the teacher from the outside to want to live in Immokalee? Because there's not a lot of housing here for that kind of income bracket. So, the options is here, and so, we're hoping that perhaps going through this process where we would have come up with a lot of different solutions. So, thanks. Wayne: Thanks, Mike. Anybody else have any other questions or comments? Max: Maybe do you know where the bypass is to come in? Wayne: We have another comment related to the State Road 29 bypass? Max: Supposed to be a bypass to Immokalee. Maybe all the traffic for Immokalee right now, [inaudible]will take that, and they're going to Miami and so and so forth. And that'll take some of the pressure off, Westclox because that's like [inaudible] – Maria: Yeah, so, where's the new road gonna be? Max: [Inaudible]. Maria: [inaudible] – Wayne: Sir, if I might. The people out here that are on Zoom aren't going to pick you up. So, either you come up and use the microphone, or I'll try to repeat. The question was whether or not the State Road 29 bypass, when it's built, will it take some of the traffic off, the pressure off some of the local streets. And I don't know the answer to that question. Jim, you may know more. I really don’t. Jim: The state's still studying it. Wayne: Yeah, the state is still studying that issue. Max: [inaudible]? Jim: Yeah, I mean, it's still in the PDE [inaudible]. It's not [inaudible]. Wayne So, the comment from Jim Banks was that it's still in the planning, design, and engineering phase, and it's not a funded improvement by the state. Max: All right, put the stop light up there then. 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 350 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) Transcript March 30, 2021 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ (PL20200001827) NIM Page 8 of 9 Wayne: All right. Well, thanks for your comment. So, if those of you on Zoom don’t have any further comments, and there's no other questions in the room, I'm gonna go ahead – Female Speaker: [Inaudible]. Wayne: Okay, sure, go right ahead. Martin - Zoom: The only commercial area is the area just immediately to the north of the Handy food store on the corner. Is that correct? Wayne: That is correct. Martin: So, the small parcel there. Wayne: Yes, it's a tiny little 0.4 acre parcel, but it just made sense. It's in the commercial designation, and we've asked for C3 zoning, which is the same zoning on the properties north and south of us. Martin: All right. One other question is the area immediately to the west of us. Has the Natural Resources Department looked at that? Because it is wet there. Wayne: There are. I think the better quality is at the western piece that we show as on preserve. I think the RCMA folks have an opportunity there to potentially make some interactive trails and do some other outdoor recreation. I don’t think there's any building improvement plan for that southeast corner near the commercial tract. Martin: Okay. Well, thank you very much. Wayne: Sure. Thank you all for participating. Any other comments or questions? If not, we're gonna adjourn the meeting. Female Speaker 2: Can you share what the gentleman asked? Wayne: Oh, I'm sorry. The folks in the audience didn’t hear the question. The question was, the area just immediately west of our commercial tract, he mentioned that there appear to be wetlands there. And I know Marco Espinar, our biologist, has been out on the site and created the vegetative mapping. There are potentially some wetlands in that area. I don’t think that the intent is for RCMA to put physical buildings in that southeast corner. I think that preliminarily, we're looking at that to be open-space, recreational uses for the campus. 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 351 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) Transcript March 30, 2021 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ (PL20200001827) NIM Page 9 of 9 All right. Thanks. Anything else, everybody? If not, thanks everybody for taking the time to join us tonight. We're adjourned. [End of Audio] Duration: 20 minutes 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 352 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 353 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 354 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) 9.A.1.e Packet Pg. 355 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliercountyfl.gov (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Hybrid Virtual Quasi-Judicial Public Hearing Waiver Emergency/Executive Order 2020-04 Hearing of the Collier County Planning Commission and Board of County Commissioners For Petition Number(s): _________________________________________________________________ Regarding the above subject petition number(s), ________________________________ (Name of Applicant) elects to proceed during the declared emergency with hybrid virtual public hearings of the Collier County Planning Commission and Board of County Commissioners, and waives the right to contest any procedural irregularity due to the hybrid virtual nature of the public hearing. Name: _________________________________ Date: ___________________________ Signature*: ______________________________ Applicant Legal Counsel to Applicant * This form must be signed by either the Applicant (if the applicant is a corporate entity, this must be an officer of the corporate entity) or the legal counsel to the Applicant. 8/16/2021 9.A.1.f Packet Pg. 356 Attachment: Attachment E - Hybrid Meeting Waiver (17588 : PL20200001827 RCMA Immokalee PUDZ) 09/16/2021 COLLIER COUNTY Collier County Planning Commission Item Number: 9.A.2 Item Summary: PL20210000731 PUDA Community School of Naples - An Ordinance of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida amending Ordinance Number 12 -05, the Community School of Naples Community Facility Planned Unit Development (CFPUD) to add acreage and relocate; by amending Ordinance Number 2004-41, the Collier County Land Development Code, by amending the appropriate zoning atlas map or maps by changing the zoning classification of an additional 3.95± acres of land zoned Residential Single Family-3 (RSF-3) to the Community School of Naples CFPUD; by revising the development standards; by amending the master plan and revising developer commitments. The property is located on the west side of Livingston Road and north of Pine Ridge Road in Section 12, Township 49 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida consisting of 77± acres; and by providing an effective date. [Coordinator: Timothy Finn, AICP, Principal Planner] Meeting Date: 09/16/2021 Prepared by: Title: – Zoning Name: Tim Finn 08/30/2021 2:09 PM Submitted by: Title: – Zoning Name: Mike Bosi 08/30/2021 2:09 PM Approved By: Review: Planning Commission Diane Lynch Review item Completed 08/30/2021 6:48 PM Zoning Ray Bellows Additional Reviewer Completed 09/02/2021 5:32 PM Growth Management Operations & Regulatory Management Donna Guitard Review Item Completed 09/07/2021 10:13 AM Zoning Mike Bosi Zoning Director Review Completed 09/07/2021 11:58 AM Growth Management Department James C French GMD Deputy Dept Head Completed 09/07/2021 5:14 PM Planning Commission Edwin Fryer Meeting Pending 09/16/2021 9:00 AM 9.A.2 Packet Pg. 357 PUDA-PL20210000731; Community School of Naples Page 1 of 11 Revised: August 30, 2021 STAFF REPORT TO: COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: ZONING DIVISION – ZONING SERVICES SECTION GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT HEARING DATE: SEPTEMBER 16, 2021 SUBJECT: PUDA-PL20210000731 COMMUNITY SCHOOL OF NAPLES ______________________________________________________________________________ Owner/Applicant: Agent: Community School of Naples, Inc. Kenrick Gallander 13275 Livingston Road Naples, FL 34109 RWA, Inc. 6610 Willow Park Avenue Naples, FL 34109 REQUESTED ACTION: The petitioner is requesting that the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) consider an application to amend Ordinance Number 12-05, the Community School of Naples Community Facility Planned Unit Development (CFPUD). GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The subject property consists of 77± acres and is located on the west side of Livingston Road and north of Pine Ridge Road in Section 12, Township 49 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. (see location map, page 2). PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The petitioner seeks to amend the Community School of Naples (CFPUD) by changing the zoning classification of an additional 3.95 ± acres of land zoned Residential Single Family-3 (RSF-3) to the Community School of Naples CFPUD; by revising the development standards; by amending the master plan and revising developer commitments. The additional 3.95 ± acres into the CPUD boundary will be designated as part of the overall CF tract and is intended to provide for relocated parking/driveway access as shown on the revised Master Plan (PUD Document – Exhibit C) to support the schools facilities as well as any new potential new facilities the school may need in the future. 9.A.2.a Packet Pg. 358 Attachment: Staff Report - Community School of Naples PUDA (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) PUDA-PL20210000731; Community School of Naples Page 2 of 11 Revised: August 30, 2021 9.A.2.a Packet Pg. 359 Attachment: Staff Report - Community School of Naples PUDA (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) PUDA-PL20210000731; Community School of Naples Page 3 of 11 Revised: August 30, 2021 SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING: This section of the staff report identifies the land uses and zoning classifications for properties and surrounding boundaries of the 3.95± acre addition into the existing Community School of Naples CFPUD: North: Undeveloped land then to the north is developed with a school with a current zoning designation of Residential Single Family-3 (RSF-3) District South: Developed with multi-family residential with a current zoning designation of Cypress Glen PUD (7.0 DU/AC) that is approved for multi-family residential East: Developed with a school with a current zoning designation of Community School of Naples CFPUD that is approved for schools, private and parochial schools, educational services, childcare centers, civic and cultural facilities, museums, parks and playgrounds, noncommercial recreation facilities, and open space uses. West: Undeveloped land then to the west is developed with a school with a current zoning designation of Residential Single Family-3 (RSF-3) District Source: Collier County Property Appraiser 9.A.2.a Packet Pg. 360 Attachment: Staff Report - Community School of Naples PUDA (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) PUDA-PL20210000731; Community School of Naples Page 4 of 11 Revised: August 30, 2021 GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN (GMP) CONSISTENCY: The GMP is the prevailing document to support land-use decisions, such as this proposed amendment. Staff is required to make a recommendation regarding a finding of consistency or inconsistency with the overall GMP as part of the recommendation for approval, approval with conditions, or denial of any amendment petition. This petition is consistent with the GMP. Future Land Use Element (FLUE): The subject site is designated Urban, Urban Mixed-Use District, partially Urban Residential Subdistrict and partially in the Livingston -Pine Ridge Commercial Infill Subdistrict Inset on the Future Land Use Map of the Growth Management Plan. The Community School of Naples CFPUD is being amended to add 3.95 acres to the 73- acre site for a new total of approximately 77-acres. This new area will allow for the construction of a new dining hall, performance/training facility, maintenance building and more. A SDPA petition (PL20210000798) is currently under review. Childcare centers are listed as the fourth and Schools and school facilities are listed as the fifth allowable non-residential use in the Urban Designation Section of the Future Land Use Element of the Growth Management Plan. This project uses are consistent with the FLUE of the GMP. Transportation Element: Transportation Planning staff has evaluated the proposed changes. The proposed expansion presents no issue with consistency. There are no additional uses proposed, no changes to the PUD trip impacts and no additional impacts on the adjacent roadways. Th erefore, staff finds the petition consistent with the GMP. Conservation and Coastal Management Element: Environmental review staff found this project to be consistent with the Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME). Native vegetation required to be retained for the PUD was approved in accordance with Ordinance 12-05 (minimum 1.66 acres). The proposed changes do not affect any of the environmental requirements of the GMP. STAFF ANALYSIS: Staff has completed a comprehensive evaluation of this land use petition, including the criteria upon which a recommendation must be based, specifically noted in LDC Section 10.02.13.B.5, Planning Commission Recommendation (commonly referred to as the “PUD Findings”), and Section 10.02.08.F, Nature of Requirements of Planning Commission Report (referred to as “Rezone Findings”), which establish the legal basis to support the CCPC’s recommendation. An evaluation relative to these subsections is discussed below, under the heading “Zoning Services Analysis.” Drainage: The proposed PUD Amendment request is not anticipated to create drainage problems in the area. Stormwater best management practices, treatment, and storage will be addressed through the environmental resource permitting process with the South Florida Water Management District. County staff will also evaluate the project’s stormwater management system, calculations, and design criteria at the time of site development plan (SDP) and/or platting (PPL). 9.A.2.a Packet Pg. 361 Attachment: Staff Report - Community School of Naples PUDA (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) PUDA-PL20210000731; Community School of Naples Page 5 of 11 Revised: August 30, 2021 Environmental Review: Environmental planning staff has reviewed this petition to address environmental concerns. The PUD preserve requirement is 1.66 acres, per Ordinance 12-05. No listed plant or animal species were observed on the property. The property is in Wellfield Risk Management Special Treatment Overlay zone (ST/W-4) and must address groundwater protection in accordance with LDC Section 3.06.12. The community facility uses listed in the “Community School of Naples PUD Permitted Uses Exhibit A” are allowable uses within the W-4 zone. Pollution Prevention Best Management Practices (BMPs) must be provided at time of PPL or SDP review for those land uses which have the potential to cause impacts to drinking water. Landscape Review: There are no deviations related to landscaping requirements with this application. The previously approved deviations in the current PUD ordinance are related to buffers that are not adjacent to the area of land being added into the PUD. Transportation Review: Transportation staff has reviewed the petition and recommends approval of this request. Utilities Review: As noted on the Statement of Utility Provisions, the proposed changes to the PUD will not result in an increase to student population (i.e., no increase in demand/flow). Zoning Services Review: In 2011, the petitioner requested a rezone from the CF zoning district to the CFPUD zoning district through a Planned Unit Development Rezone (PUDZ) petition. The purpose of the PUDZ was a corrective action to legitimize the existing site conditions at the school property. The petitioner had submitted a Site Development Plan Amendment (SDPA) to add a wing to the existing Upper School. The application was rejected because the proposed building height was 32 feet, while the maximum building height in the CF zoning district is 30 feet. Research indicated that other existing buildings on the campus also exceeded the maximum building height. The petitioner decided to abate the situation by cr eating a CFPUD with development standards identical to the CF zoning district, except for the maximum zoned building height, which is proposed at 45 feet, to address the tallest existing structure. The approval of the Community School of Naples CFPUD legitimized all the existing structures on site and permitted the construction of the Upper School wing with a roofline matching the existing school and was memorialized via Ordinance 12-05. In 2019, the property was approved for a PUD Minor Change (PMC-PL20190000372) for an 8- foot-high black chain link security fence and access gates along the perimeter of the property that was integrated with existing fencing, the master plan was modified to show the placement of a science building and an athletic field facility, a student activity center, amphitheater, and the Lower School Buildings. (See Attachment B - Community School of Naples PMC – response letter with attachment 6-28-19) In June 2021, the property was approved with another PMC Minor Change (PMC - PL20210001183) for the demolition of an existing maintenance building and relocating and 9.A.2.a Packet Pg. 362 Attachment: Staff Report - Community School of Naples PUDA (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) PUDA-PL20210000731; Community School of Naples Page 6 of 11 Revised: August 30, 2021 constructing a new maintenance building to the northwestern section of the PUD, and the construction of a dining facility, performance center, playground area, service facility area, and beach volleyball courts. (See Attachment C -- Community School of Naples PMC – response letter with attachment 6-16-21) This PUDA petition, proposes to incorporate an additional 3.95± acres into the existing CFPUD boundary and will be designated as part of the overall CF Tract. The intention is to provide for relocated parking/driveway access as shown on the revised Master Plan (PUD Document - Exhibit C) to support the schools’ facilities as well as any potential new facilities the school may need in the future. The applicant is also adding the water management structures use under Accessory Structures in the PUD document in the CF tract. This PUDA petition is concurrent with a prior submitted Planned Unit Development Minor Change (PMC) petition (PL20210001183) approved June 16, 2021, amending the existing Master Plan to allow for construction of a new dining hall, performance/training facility, maintenance building, playground area, service facility area, and beach volleyball courts. It should be noted that all approved modifications in the 2019 and 2021 PMC approvals are incorporated into this PUDA petition. LDC Section 10.02.13.B.5 states that “In support of its recommendation, the CCPC shall make findings as to the PUD Master Plan’s compliance with the following criteria in addition to the findings in LDC Section 10.02.08”: 1. The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer, water, and other utilities. Water transmission and wastewater transmission mains are readily available, and there is adequate water and wastewater treatment capacity to serve the proposed PUD amendment. Moreover, Staff has reviewed the proposed amendment and is of the opinion the uses and property development regulations are compatible with the development approved in the areas regarding traffic and drainage. 2. Adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of any proposed agreements, contracts, or other instruments, or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense. Documents submitted with the application, which were reviewed by the County Attorney’s Office, demonstrate unified control of the property. 3. Conformity of the proposed Planned Unit Development with the goals, objectives, and policies of the Growth Management Plan (GMP). County staff has reviewed this petition and has offered an analysis of conformity with the relevant goals, objectives, and policies of the GMP within the GMP Consistency portion of this staff report on page 4. 9.A.2.a Packet Pg. 363 Attachment: Staff Report - Community School of Naples PUDA (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) PUDA-PL20210000731; Community School of Naples Page 7 of 11 Revised: August 30, 2021 4. The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening requirements. As described in the Staff Analysis section of this staff report, the proposed changes to the PUD do not affect the landscaping standards of the original PUD. 5. The adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the development. No deviation from the required usable open space is being requested, and compliance would be demonstrated at the time of SDP or PPL. 6. The timing or sequence of development for the purpose of ensuring the adequacy of available improvements and facilities, both public and private. The roadway infrastructure is sufficient to serve the proposed project, as noted in the Transportation Element consistency review. Operational impacts will be addressed at time of first development order (SDP or Plat), at which time a new TIS will be required to demonstrate turning movements for all site access points. Finally, the project’s development must comply with all other applicable concurrency management regulations when development approvals, including but not limited to any plats and or site development plans, are sought. Moreover, Collier County has sufficient treatment capacity for water and wastewater services to the project. Conveyance capacity must be confirmed at the time of development permit application. 7. The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion. The area has adequate supporting infrastructure, including adjacent Collier County Water- Sewer District potable water and wastewater mains, to accommodate this project. 8. Conformity with PUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the particular case, based on determination that such modifications are justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations. The petitioner is not requesting any new deviations to the LDC. Rezone Findings: LDC Subsection 10.02.08.F states, “When pertaining to the rezoning of land, the report and recommendations to the planning commission to the Board of County Commissioners…shall show that the planning commission has studied and considered proposed change in relation to the following when applicable”: 9.A.2.a Packet Pg. 364 Attachment: Staff Report - Community School of Naples PUDA (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) PUDA-PL20210000731; Community School of Naples Page 8 of 11 Revised: August 30, 2021 1. Whether the proposed change will be consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the Future Land Use Map and the elements of the GMP. Comprehensive Planning staff determined the subject petition is consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the (FLUM) and other elements of the GMP. 2. The existing land use pattern. The existing land use pattern (of the abutting properties) is described in the Surrounding Land Use and Zoning section of this staff report. The proposed use would not change the existing land use patterns of the surrounding properties. 3. The possible creation of an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts. The property is currently zoned PUD and would remain as such. 4. Whether existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the property proposed for change. The PUD follows the boundaries and contours of the subject parcel and boundary survey which includes the additional 3.95 ± acres of land zoned Residential Single Family-3 (RSF- 3) to the Community School of Naples CFPUD. 5. Whether changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed rezoning necessary. The proposed change is not necessary; however, it is being requested in compliance with the LDC provisions to seek such changes because the petitioner wishes to include the proposed uses and development standards that are specific to the subject parcel. 6. Whether the proposed change will adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood. The proposed PUD Amendment is not anticipated to adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood. 7. Whether the proposed change will create or excessively increase traffic congestion or create types of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses, because of peak volumes or projected types of vehicular traffic, including activity during construction phases of the development, or otherwise affect public safety. The roadway infrastructure has adequate capacity to serve the proposed project at this time, i.e., GMP consistent at the time of rezoning as evaluated as part of the GMP Transportation Element consistency review. Operational impacts will be addressed at time of first development order (SDP or Plat). Additionally, the project’s development must comply with all other applicable concurrency management regulations when development approvals are sought. 9.A.2.a Packet Pg. 365 Attachment: Staff Report - Community School of Naples PUDA (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) PUDA-PL20210000731; Community School of Naples Page 9 of 11 Revised: August 30, 2021 8. Whether the proposed change will create a drainage problem. The proposed PUD Amendment request is not anticipated to create adverse drainage impacts in the area; provided stormwater best management practices, treatment, and storage on this project are addressed through Environmental Resource Permitting (ERP) with the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD). County staff will evaluate the project’s stormwater management system, calculations, and design criteria at the time of SDP and/or PPL. 9. Whether the proposed change will seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas. It is not anticipated the changes proposed to this PUD Amendment would seriously reduce light or air to the adjacent areas. 10. Whether the proposed change will adversely affect property values in the adjacent areas. This is a subjective determination based upon anticipated results, which may be internal or external to the subject property. Property valuation is affected by a host of factors including zoning; however, zoning by itself may or may not affect values, since value determination is driven by market value. 11. Whether the proposed change will be a deterrent to the improvement or development of adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations. The additional 3.95 ± acres of land zoned Residential Single Family-3 (RSF-3) to the Community School of Naples CFPUD is not anticipated to serve as a deterrent to the improvement of adjacent property. 12. Whether the proposed change will constitute a grant of special privil ege to an individual owner as contrasting with the public welfare. If the proposed development complies with the GMP through the proposed amendment, then that constitutes a public policy statement supporting zoning actions when they are consistent with said Comprehensive Plan. In light of this fact, the proposed change does not constitute a grant of special privilege. Consistency with the FLUE is further determined to be a public welfare relationship because actions consistent with plans are in the public interest. 13. Whether there are substantial reasons why the property cannot be used in accordance with existing zoning. The subject property can be used in accordance with existing zoning; however, the proposed uses cannot be achieved without amending the PUD. 9.A.2.a Packet Pg. 366 Attachment: Staff Report - Community School of Naples PUDA (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) PUDA-PL20210000731; Community School of Naples Page 10 of 11 Revised: August 30, 2021 14. Whether the change suggested is out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the County. It is staff’s opinion that the proposed uses, associated development standards, and developer commitments will ensure that the project is not out of scale with the needs of the community. 15. Whether is it impossible to find other adequate sites in the County for the proposed use in districts already permitting such use. The petition was reviewed for compliance with the GMP and the LDC, and staff does not specifically review other sites in conjunction with a specific petition. 16. The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site alteration, which would be required to make the property usable for any of the range of potential uses under the proposed zoning classification. Any development anticipated by the PUD Document would require considerable site alteration, and this project will undergo extensive evaluation relative to all federal, state, and local development regulations during the SDP and/or platting processes, and again later as part of the building permit process. 17. The impact of development on the availability of adequate public facilities and services consistent with the levels of service adopted in the Collier County Growth Management Plan and as defined and implemented through the Collier County Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance, as amended. The activity proposed by this amendment will have no adverse impact on public utilities facility adequacy. 18. Such other factors, standards, or criteria that the Board of County Commissioners shall deem important in the protection of the public health, safety, and welfare. To be determined by the Board during its advertised public hearing. NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING (NIM): The applicant conducted a NIM on July 14, 2021 at the Community School of Naples located at 13275 Livingston Road, Naples, FL. The meeting commenced at approximately 5:35 p.m. and ended at 5:51 p.m. The applicant’s agent explained the request for the proposed PUD Amendment. Ken Gallander, the agent, gave a PowerPoint presentation. It was discussed that the project will bring an additional 3.95 acres of land into the existing CFPUD totaling 77 acres. The PUD Amendment would be adding an additional accessory use to the CF section of the PUD which is “Water Management structures in accordance with Collier County, SFWMD, DEP, and USACOE permitting requirements.” Mr. Gallander further explained that the project will be using the same development standards and buffer requirements for the 3.95-acre parcel as in the existing PUD. 9.A.2.a Packet Pg. 367 Attachment: Staff Report - Community School of Naples PUDA (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) PUDA-PL20210000731; Community School of Naples Page 11 of 11 Revised: August 30, 2021 The meeting was opened to attendees for questions. The first question was on any anticipated traffic. The agent said that there is no anticipated traffic. The second question was concerning why the four-acre parcel wasn’t incorporated back in 2012. Ken explained that it was because of title concerns. Since these concerns had cleared, the school is requesting to incorporate this four-acre area into the CFPUD. No commitments were discussed at this NIM meeting. A copy of the NIM materials are included in Attachment C. Currently there is a pending petition at this location other than this PUDA which is Site Development Plan Amendment (SDPA) petition currently under review by Collier County (PL20210000798). ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL (EAC) RECOMMENDATION: This project does not require Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) review, as this project did not meet the EAC scope of land development project reviews as identified in Section 2-1193 of the Collier County Codes of Laws and Ordinances. COUNTY ATTORNEY OFFICE REVIEW: The County Attorney’s Office reviewed this staff report on August 30, 2021. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the CCPC forward this petition to the Board with a recommendation of approval of the PUDA. Attachments: A) Proposed Ordinance B) Community School of Naples PMC – response letter with attachment 6-28-19 C) Community School of Naples PMC – response letter with attachment 6-16-21 D) Application/Backup Materials 9.A.2.a Packet Pg. 368 Attachment: Staff Report - Community School of Naples PUDA (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) 9.A.2.b Packet Pg. 369 Attachment: Attachment A - Proposed Ordinance (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) 9.A.2.b Packet Pg. 370 Attachment: Attachment A - Proposed Ordinance (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) Words underlined are additions; Words struck through are deletions Community School of Naples PL 20210000731 7/21/2021 Page 1 of 14 EXHIBIT A PROJECT LAND USE TRACTS TRACT LAND USE ACREAGE TRACT “CF” COMMUNITY FACILITY 71.34 75.34 TRACT “P” PRESERVE 1.66 TOTAL ACREAGE 73.00 77.00 I TRACT CF PERMITTED USES: No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or in part, for other than the following: A. Principal Uses: 1) Child care centers; 2) Civic and cultural facilities; 3) Museums; 4) Parks and playgrounds, noncommercial recreation facilities, open space uses; 5) Schools, private and parochial schools. This includes Educational Plants for public schools; 6) Social and fraternal organizations; 7) Educational services (groups 8211—8231); 8) Any other principal use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing list of permitted principal uses, as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals (“BZA”) by the process outlined in the Land Development Code (LDC). B. Accessory Uses: Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with the permitted principal uses and structures, including, but not limited to: 1) Customary accessory uses and structures associated with schools including but not limited to: administrative offices; theaters; auditoriums; pavilions; gymnasiums; residence halls; swimming pools with or without screened enclosures; aquatic centers; ball fields, with or without grandstands/stadium seating; press boxes; practice fields; track and field facilities and field houses, tennis courts, athletic equipment and general storage buildings, and other indoor or outdoor recreation facilities, maintenance and landscape storage; 2) Security gatehouses; 3) Polling place if deemed warranted by the Supervisor of Elections. 9.A.2.b Packet Pg. 371 Attachment: Attachment A - Proposed Ordinance (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) Words underlined are additions; Words struck through are deletions Community School of Naples PL 20210000731 7/21/2021 Page 2 of 14 4) Water management structures in accordance with Collier County, SFWMD, DEP, and USACOE permitting requirements. II TRACT P PERMITTED USES: No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or in part, for other than the following: A. Principal Uses: 1) Upland preserves; 2). Wetland preserves. B Accessory Uses and Structures: Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with the permitted principal uses and structures, including, but not limited to: 1. Boardwalks, nature trails, shelters, viewing platforms, educational signs, and information kiosks; 2. Water management structures in accordance with Collier County, SFWMD, DEP, and USACOE permitting requirements; Reference Executive Office of the President, Office of Management and Budget, Standard Industrial Classification Manual, 1987 Edition 9.A.2.b Packet Pg. 372 Attachment: Attachment A - Proposed Ordinance (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) Words underlined are additions; Words struck through are deletions Community School of Naples PL 20210000731 7/21/2021 Page 3 of 14 EXHIBIT B DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS GENERAL: Development of Community School of Naples CFPUD shall be in accordance with the contents of this Ordinance and applicable sections of the Collier County LDC and Growth Management Plan (GMP) in effect at the time of issuance of any development order, such as, but not limited to, subdivision plat, site development plan, excavation permit, and preliminary work authorization, to which such regulations relate. Where these regulations fail to provide developmental standards, then the provisions of the most similar district in the LDC shall apply. Except as provided for herein, all criteria set forth below shall be understood to be in relation to individual parcel or lot boundary lines, or between structures. Table I below sets forth the development standards for land uses within the CFPUD Community Facility Subdistrict (Tract “CF”). Standards not specifically set forth herein shall be those specified in applicable sections of the LDC in effect as of the date of approval of the SDP or Subdivision plat. 9.A.2.b Packet Pg. 373 Attachment: Attachment A - Proposed Ordinance (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) Words underlined are additions; Words struck through are deletions Community School of Naples PL 20210000731 7/21/2021 Page 4 of 14 TABLE I COMMUNITY FACILITY DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS COMMUNITY FACILITIES PRINCIPAL STRUCTURES MINIMUM LOT AREA 10,000 S.F. MINIMUM LOT WIDTH (LINEAR FEET) 80 FEET MINIMUM FLOOR AREA 1,000 S.F (GROUND FLOOR) MIN FRONT YARD 25 FEET MIN SIDE YARD 15 FEET MIN REAR YARD 15 FEET MIN PRESERVE SETBACK 25 FEET MIN. DISTANCE BETWEEN STRUCTURES ½ SUM OF BUILDING HEIGHTS MINIMUM 25 FEET ZONED - MAX. BUILDING HEIGHT (NOT TO EXCEED) 45 FEET* ACCESSORY STRUCTURES FRONT S.P.S. SIDE S.P.S. REAR S.P.S. PRESERVE SETBACK 10 FEET MINIMUM DISTANCE BETWEEN STRUCTURES 10 FEET ZONED - MAX. BUILDING HEIGHT (NOT TO EXCEED) S.P.S. S.P.S. = Same as Principal Structures *Actual height: 71 feet (Existing LMA building) 9.A.2.b Packet Pg. 374 Attachment: Attachment A - Proposed Ordinance (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) Words underlined are additions; Words struck through are deletions Community School of Naples PL 20210000731 7/21/2021 Page 5 of 14 EXHIBIT C MASTER PLAN 9.A.2.bPacket Pg. 375Attachment: Attachment A - Proposed Ordinance (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples EXISTING LAKE RSF-3 NAPLES PROGRESSIVE GYMNASTICS CAMP PUD ST NON ST L L CF CF A, AGRICULTURE CU CF A, AGRICULTURE CU A, AGRICULTURE THE EXISTING PRESERVE SATISFIES LANDSCAPING & BUFFER REQUIREMENTS 4 L ACTIVITY CENTER FIELD HOUSE NORRIS POOL EXISTING PRESERVE (1.66 AC) AQUATIC CENTER MEDIA CENTER SCIENCE BLDG PU BARRON COLLIER HIGH SCHOOL CYPRESS GLEN CU P STUDENT ACTIVITY CENTER LOWER SCHOOL FUTURE FACILITY DEVELOPMENT AREA LOWER SCHOOL DINING FACILITY CF PLAYGROUND AREA SERVICE FACILITY AREA LAND USE SUMMARY TRACT LAND USE ACREAGE TRACT "CF" COMMUNITY FACILITY 75.34 TRACT "P"PRESERVE 1.66 TOTAL 77.00 6610 Willow Park Drive, Suite 200Naples, Florida 34109(239) 597-0575 FAX: (239) 597-0578www.consult-rwa.comFlorida Certificates of AuthorizationEB 7663 LB 6952 P CF L X ST CFPUD MASTER PLAN NOTES 1 PRESERVE REQUIREMENT PRESERVE REQUIREMENT REQUIRED PRESERVE PRESERVE PROVIDED 15% OF EXISTING NATIVE VEGETATION (5.58 ACRES)0.84 ACRES 1.66 ACRES 9.A.2.b Packet Pg. 376 Attachment: Attachment A - Proposed Ordinance (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) RPUD X L LCF CF L 1 2 1 2 3EXISTI N G T R A C K AND FI E L D PRESS BOX BASEBALL FIELD SOFTBALL FIELD TENNIS COURTS PRACTICE FIELD MANCHESTER SQUARE ATHLETIC FIELD MAINTENANCE BUILDING PERFORMANCE CENTER BEACH VOLLEYBALL COURTS 6610 Willow Park Drive, Suite 200Naples, Florida 34109(239) 597-0575 FAX: (239) 597-0578www.consult-rwa.comFlorida Certificates of AuthorizationEB 7663 LB 6952 P CF L X ST 1 ” 9.A.2.b Packet Pg. 377 Attachment: Attachment A - Proposed Ordinance (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) Words underlined are additions; Words struck through are deletions Community School of Naples PL 20210000731 7/21/2021 Page 8 of 14 EXHIBIT D Legal Description (Preliminary legal, pending title work) A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN THE EAST ONE-QUARTER (1/4) OF SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTH QUARTER CORNER OF SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. THENCE ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST ONE- QUARTER (1/4) OF SAID SECTION 12, S89°30'40"E FOR 1386.36 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST ONE-QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 12, THE FOLLOWING SIX (6) DESCRIBED COURSES: 1) THENCE N00°05'00"W FOR 75.00 FEET, TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF PARCEL 106 (FEE SIMPLE) AS DESCRIBED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 2952, PAGE 1616 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; 2) THENCE ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID PARCEL 106, N00°05'00"W FOR 10.00 FEET, TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE PARCEL DESCRIBED HEREIN; 3) THENCE N00°05'00"W FOR 1235.06 FEET; 4) THENCE N00°05'25"W FOR 1015.36 FEET; 5) THENCE N00°10'26"W FOR 304.90 FEET 6) THENCE N00°29'43"W FOR 1219.68 FEET, TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY OF OSCEOLA TRAIL (SHOWN ON SKETCH AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION PREPARED BY HOLE MONTES DATED 9/01 PROJECT NUMBER 1998149, DRAWING NUMBER B-3404); THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID OSCEOLA TRAIL, THE FOLLOWING TWO (2) DESCRIBED COURSES: 1) THENCE S89°33'47"E FOR 200.20 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENTIAL CURVE; 2) THENCE 172.82 FEET ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 285.00 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 34°44'38", AND WHOSE LONG CHORD BEARS S72°11'29"E FOR A DISTANCE OF 170.19 FEET, TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON-TANGENTIAL CURVE, ALSO BEING A POINT ON THE BOUNDARY OF A LAKE PARCEL DESCRIBED BY HOLE MONTES DATED 2/03, PROJECT NUMBER 03.515, DRAWING NUMBER B-4162; THENCE ALONG SAID LAKE PARCEL BOUNDARY, THE FOLLOWING NINE (9) DESCRIBED COURSES: 1) THENCE 7.88 FEET ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 45.00 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 10°01'58", AND WHOSE LONG CHORD BEARS S80°03'03"W FOR A DISTANCE OF 7.87 FEET; 2) THENCE S36°05'39"W FOR 106.66 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON-TANGENTIAL CURVE; 3) THENCE 34.38 FEET ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 45.00 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 43°46'27", AND WHOSE LONG CHORD BEARS S24°44'14"E FOR A DISTANCE OF 33.55 FEET, TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON-TANGENTIAL CURVE; 4) THENCE 36.47 FEET ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 155.04 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 13°28'45", AND WHOSE LONG CHORD BEARS S39°53'07"E FOR A DISTANCE OF 36.39 FEET, TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON-TANGENTIAL CURVE; 5) THENCE 71.28 FEET ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 120.00 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 34°02'07", AND WHOSE LONG CHORD BEARS S50°36'17"E FOR A DISTANCE OF 70.24 FEET; 6) THENCE S67°37'21"E FOR 62.82 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENTIAL CURVE; 7) THENCE 59.78 FEET ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 120.00 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 28°32'28", AND WHOSE LONG CHORD BEARS S81°53'39"E FOR A DISTANCE OF 59.16 FEET; 8) THENCE N83°50'03"E FOR 23.32 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENTIAL CURVE; 9) THENCE 54.37 FEET ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 35.00 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 89°00'31", AND WHOSE LONG CHORD BEARS N39°19'12"E FOR A DISTANCE OF 49.07 FEET, TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON-TANGENTIAL CURVE, ALSO BEING A POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID OSCEOLA TRAIL; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID OSCEOLA TRAIL, THE FOLLOWING TWO (2) DESCRIBED COURSES: 1) THENCE 244.65 FEET ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 385.00 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 36°24'34", AND WHOSE LONG CHORD BEARS S71°21'30"E FOR A DISTANCE OF 240.56 FEET; 9.A.2.b Packet Pg. 378 Attachment: Attachment A - Proposed Ordinance (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) Words underlined are additions; Words struck through are deletions Community School of Naples PL 20210000731 7/21/2021 Page 9 of 14 2) THENCE S89°33'47"E FOR 306.64 FEET, TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE WESTERLY RIGHT -OF- WAY LINE OF LIVINGSTON ROAD (COUNTY ROAD 881, AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS FOR COUNTY PROJECT NUMBER 62071 DATE STAMPED 7/16/02 @ 12:29:34 PM); THENCE ALONG THE WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SAID LIVINGSTON ROAD, THE FOLLOWING FOUR (4) DESCRIBED COURSES: 1) THENCE S00°50'38"E FOR 134.04 FEET; 2) THENCE N89°10'59"E FOR 10.00 FEET; 3) THENCE S00°50'38"E FOR 783.66 FEET TO A BREAK POINT AS OFFSET FROM THE EAST LINE OF SECTION 12; 4) THENCE S00°17'36"E FOR 1316.08 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID LIVINGSTON ROAD WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY, N89°30'32"W FOR 235.06 FEET, TO A POINT ON THE WESTERLY BOUNDARY OF FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY UTILITY EASEMENTS AS DESCRIBED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 162, PAGE 211 AND OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 429, PAGE 356 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AND AS SHOWN IN ROAD BOOK 2, PAGE 98-101 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE ALONG THE WESTERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID EASEMENTS, S00°17'18"E FOR 521.25 FEET; THENCE N89°31'12"W FOR 181.55 FEET; THENCE S00°10'47"E FOR 139.04 FEET, TO A POINT ON THE MONUMENTED NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH HALF (1/2) OF THE SOUTHEAST ONE-QUARTER (1/4) OF THE SOUTHEAST ONE-QUARTER (1/4) OF SAID SECTION 12; THENCE ALONG SAID MONUMENTED NORTH LINE, N89°31'23"W FOR 591.69 FEET, TO A POINT ON THE MONUMENTED EAST LINE OF THE WEST 100 FEET OF THE EAST ONE-QUARTER (1/4) OF SAID SECTION 12; THENCE ALONG SAID MONUMENTED EAST LINE OF THE WEST 100 FEET OF THE EAST ONE - QUARTER (1/4), S00°05'41"E FOR 575.60 FEET, TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID PARCEL 106; THENCE ALONG THE NORTHERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID PARCEL 106, N89°21'57"W FOR 99.95 FEET, TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE PARCEL HEREIN DESCRIBED. CONTAINING 3,181,994.68 SQUARE FEET OR 73.0 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS AND RESTRICTIONS OF RECORD. A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTH QUARTER (1/4) CORNER OF SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE S89°30'40"E FOR 1386.36 FEET ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (1/4) OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) OF SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) OF SAID SECTION 12; THENCE N00°05'00"W FOR 85.00 FEET ALONG THE WEST LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) OF SECTION 12, TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE ORDER OF TAKING DESCRIBED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 2660, PAGE 3356 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, ALSO BEING THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE PARCEL DESCRIBED HEREIN; THENCE CONTINUE ALONG THE WEST LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) OF SECTION 12, N00°05'00"W FOR 1235.06 FEET, TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) OF SAID SECTION 12; THENCE N00°05'25”W FOR 1015.36 FEET ALONG THE WEST LINE OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) OF SECTION 12; THENCE N00°10'26"W FOR 304.90 FEET, TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) OF SAID SECTION 12; THENCE N00°29'43"W FOR 1219.68 FEET ALONG THE WEST LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) OF SAID SECTION 12, TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY 9.A.2.b Packet Pg. 379 Attachment: Attachment A - Proposed Ordinance (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) Words underlined are additions; Words struck through are deletions Community School of Naples PL 20210000731 7/21/2021 Page 10 of 14 BOUNDARY OF A 100 FOOT WIDE PUBLIC SCHOOL ACCESS DRIVE, ALSO KNOWN AS OSCEOLA TRAIL; THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY OF OSCEOLA TRAIL, THE FOLLOWING TWO (2) DESCRIBED COURSES: 1) THENCE S89°33'47"E FOR 200.20 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENTIAL CURVE; 2) THENCE 172.82 FEET ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 285.00 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 34°44'37", AND WHOSE LONG CHORD BEARS S72°11'28"E FOR A DISTANCE OF 170.19 FEET, TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON-TANGENTIAL CURVE; THENCE LEAVING SAID SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY OF OSCEOLA TRAIL FOR THE FOLLOWING NINE (9) DESCRIBED COURSES: 1) THENCE 7.88 FEET ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 45.00 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 10°01'58", AND WHOSE LONG CHORD BEARS S80°03'03"W FOR A DISTANCE OF 7.87 FEET; 2) THENCE S36°05'39"W FOR 106.66 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON-TANGENTIAL CURVE; 3) THENCE 34.38 FEET ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 45.00 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 43°46'28", AND WHOSE LONG CHORD BEARS S24°44'15"E FOR A DISTANCE OF 33.55 FEET, TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON-TANGENTIAL CURVE; 4) THENCE 36.47 FEET ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 155.04 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 13°28'44", AND WHOSE LONG CHORD BEARS S39°53'07"E FOR A DISTANCE OF 36.39 FEET, TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON-TANGENTIAL CURVE; 5) THENCE 71.28 FEET ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 120.00 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 34°02'08", AND WHOSE LONG CHORD BEARS S50°36'17"E FOR A DISTANCE OF 70.24 FEET; 6) THENCE S67°37'21"E FOR 62.82 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENTIAL CURVE; 7) THENCE 59.78 FEET ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 120.00 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 28°32'32", AND WHOSE LONG CHORD BEARS S81°53'37"E FOR A DISTANCE OF 59.16 FEET; 8) THENCE N83°50'03"E FOR 23.32 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENTIAL CURVE; 9) THENCE 54.37 FEET ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 35.00 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 89°00'31", AND WHOSE LONG CHORD BEARS N39°19'12"E FOR A DISTANCE OF 49.07 FEET, TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON-TANGENTIAL CURVE, ALSO BEING A POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID OSCEOLA TRAIL; THENCE THE FOLLOWING TWO (2) DESCRIBED COURSES ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID OSCEOLA TRAIL: 1) THENCE 244.65 FEET ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 385.00 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 36°24'34", AND WHOSE LONG CHORD BEARS S71°21'30"E FOR A DISTANCE OF 240.56 FEET; 2) THENCE S89°33'47"E FOR 306.64 FEET, TO A POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH THE WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF LIVINGSTON ROAD (COUNTY ROAD 881); AS SHOWN ON THE ROADWAY PLANS, COUNTY PROJECT NO. 62071; THENCE ALONG SAID WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF LIVINGSTON ROAD, THE FOLLOWING FOUR (4) DESCRIBED COURSES: 1) THENCE S00°50'38"E FOR 134.04 FEET; 2) THENCE N89°10'59"E FOR 10.00 FEET; 9.A.2.b Packet Pg. 380 Attachment: Attachment A - Proposed Ordinance (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) Words underlined are additions; Words struck through are deletions Community School of Naples PL 20210000731 7/21/2021 Page 11 of 14 3) THENCE S00°50'38"E FOR 783.66 FEET, TO A BREAK POINT IN SAID WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF LIVINGSTON ROAD, AS OFFSET FROM THE EASTERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID SECTION 12; 4) THENCE S00°17'36"E FOR 1316.08 FEET, TO A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) OF SAID SECTION 12; THENCE N89°30'32"W FOR 235.06 FEET ALONG SAID NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) OF SAID SECTION 12, TO A POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH THE WESTERLY BOUNDARY OF THE EAST 510 FEET OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) OF SAID SECTION 12; THENCE S00°17'18"E FOR 521.25 FEET ALONG SAID WESTERLY BOUNDARY OF THE EAST 510 FEET OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) OF SECTION 12; THENCE LEAVING SAID WESTERLY BOUNDARY OF THE EAST 510 FEET OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) OF SECTION 12, N89°31'12"W FOR 181.55 FEET; THENCE S00°10'47"E FOR 139.04 FEET, TO A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH HALF (1/2) OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) OF SAID SECTION 12; THENCE N89°31'23"W FOR 591.69 FEET ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH HALF (1/2) OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) OF SAID SECTION 12; THENCE LEAVING SAID NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH HALF (1/2) OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) OF SAID SECTION 12, S00°05'41"E FOR 575.60 FEET, TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE ORDER OF TAKING DESCRIBED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 2660, PAGE 3356 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE N89°21'57"W FOR 99.95 FEET, ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID ORDER OF TAKING, TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE PARCEL HEREIN DESCRIBED; CONTAINING 3,181,995 SQUARE FEET OR 73.0 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS AND RESTRICTIONS OF RECORD. TOGETHER WITH A TRACT OF LAND AS DESCRIBED IN OR. BOOK 4835, PAGE 1992, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORID A PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING MORE PARTICULARL Y DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCE AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE RUN N00°17'55"W ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 12, FOR A DISTANCE OF 1320.72 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 12, THENCE RUN N89°33'10"W ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 12, FOR A DISTANCE OF 1381.30 FEET, TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 12 AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE PARCEL OF LAND HEREIN DESCRIBED: THENCE N.89°33'10"W., ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 12, FOR A DISTANCE OF 392.33 FEET; THENCE RUN N.00°26'55"E., FOR A DISTANCE OF 12.01 FEET; THENCE RUN N.17°16'31"W., FOR A DISTANCE OF 26.91 FEET; THENCE RUN N.36°52'48"E., FOR A DISTANCE OF 28.14 FEET; THENCE RUN N.02°14'11"E., FOR A DISTANCE OF 37.24 FEET; 9.A.2.b Packet Pg. 381 Attachment: Attachment A - Proposed Ordinance (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) Words underlined are additions; Words struck through are deletions Community School of Naples PL 20210000731 7/21/2021 Page 12 of 14 THENCE RUN N.20°59'45"E., FOR A DISTANCE OF 55.86 FEET; THENCE RUN N.55°57'35"E., FOR A DISTANCE OF 32.58 FEET; THENCE RUN N.25°35'56"E., FOR A DISTANCE OF 38.53 FEET; THENCE RUN N.14°12'06"E., FOR A DISTANCE OF 30.40 FEET; THENCE RUN N.38°03'22"E., FOR A DISTANCE OF 56.97 FEET; THENCE RUN N.33°34'22"E., FOR A DISTANCE OF 39.53 FEET; THENCE RUN N.40°13'55"E., FOR A DISTANCE OF 35.17 FEET; THENCE RUN N.35°12'04"W., FOR A DISTANCE OF 28.99 FEET; THENCE RUN N.00°25'59"E., FOR A DISTANCE OF 25.97 FEET; THENCE RUN N.67°39'55"E., FOR A DISTANCE OF 17.60 FEET; THENCE RUN N.47°42'44"E., FOR A DISTANCE OF 47.16 FEET; THENCE RUN N.16°23'23"E., FOR A DISTANCE OF 26.84 FEET; THENCE RUN N.56°27'41"E., FOR A DISTANCE OF 41.75 FEET; THENCE RUN N.48°06'59"E., FOR A DISTANCE OF 18.71 FEET; THENCE RUN S.79°43'39"E., FOR A DISTANCE OF 10.31 FEET; THENCE RUN N.77°03'32"E., FOR A DISTANCE OF 26.10 FEET; THENCE RUN N.79°57'37"E., FOR A DISTANCE OF 52.16 FEET; THENCE RUN N.00°04'22"W., FOR 505.22 FEET TO A POINT ON A CIRCULAR CURVE; CONCAVE SOUTHERLY, WHOSE RADIUS POINT BEARS S.17°20'34"E., A DISTANCE OF 169.00 FEET THEREON, THENCE RUN EASTERLY, ALONG SAID ARC OF SAID CURVE TO THE RIGHT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 169.00 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 17°55'05" AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD OF 52.64 FEET AT A BEARING OF N.81°38'58"E., FOR A DISTANCE OF 52.85 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EAST LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 12; THENCE RUN S.00°05'53"E., ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 12, FOR A DISTANCE OF 1015.12 FEET, TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; CONTAINING 172,105.56 SQUARE FEET OR 3.951 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. THIS PROPERTY IS SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS, RESERVATIONS OR RESTRICTIONS OF RECORDS. BEARINGS REFER TO THE EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 49, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AS BEING N00°17'55"W. 9.A.2.b Packet Pg. 382 Attachment: Attachment A - Proposed Ordinance (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) Words underlined are additions; Words struck through are deletions Community School of Naples PL 20210000731 7/21/2021 Page 13 of 14 EXHIBIT E LIST OF REQUESTED DEVIATIONS FROM LDC Deviation #1 seeks relief from LDC Subsection 4.06.02.C.4., which requires a 20’ Type D buffer along all rights-of-way for projects of 15 acres or more, to allow a 15’ Type D buffer. Deviation #2 seeks relief from LDC Subsection 4.03.08(B)1., and Section 22-112 of the Code of Ordinances related to requirements for excavations, to allow the existing perimeter buffer to encroach into the lake maintenance easement area. Deviation #3 seeks relief from LDC Subsection 4.06.02.C.4., which requires a 20’ Type D buffer along all rights-of-way for projects of 15 acres or more, to allow for no buffer adjacent to the easternmost water management pond along Osceola Trail. Deviation #4 seeks relief from LDC Subsection 4.06.02.C.1., which requires a 10’ Type A buffer between CFPUD and AG zoning districts, to allow for no buffer along a short segment of the project boundary where the existing roadway abuts the boundary. 9.A.2.b Packet Pg. 383 Attachment: Attachment A - Proposed Ordinance (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) Words underlined are additions; Words struck through are deletions Community School of Naples PL 20210000731 7/21/2021 Page 14 of 14 EXHIBIT F LIST OF DEVELOPER COMMITMENTS The development of this CFPUD shall be subject to and governed by the following conditions: TRANSPORTATION Reserved PUD MONITORING One entity (hereinafter the Managing Entity) shall be responsible for PUD monitoring until close- out of the PUD, and this entity shall also be responsible for satisfying all PUD commitments until close-out of the PUD. At the time of this PUD approval, the Managing Entity is Community School of Naples, Inc., or its assigns. Should the Managing Entity desire to transfer the monitoring and commitments to a successor entity, then it must provide a copy of a legally binding document that needs to be approved for legal sufficiency by the County Attorney. After such approval, the Managing Entity will be released of its obligations upon written approval of the transfer by County staff, and the successor entity shall become the Managing Entity. As Owner and Developer sell off tracts, the Managing Entity shall provide written notice to County that includes an acknowledgement of the commitments required by the PUD by the new owner and the new owner’s agreement to comply with the Commitments through the Managing Entity, but the Managing Entity shall not be relieved of its responsibility under this Section. When the PUD is closed-out, then the Managing Entity is no longer responsible for the monitoring and fulfillment of PUD commitments. MISCELLANEOUS Issuance of a development permit by a county does not in any way create any rights on the part of the applicant to obtain a permit from a state or federal agency and does not create any liability on the part of the county for issuance of the permit if the applicant fails to obtain requisite approvals or fulfill the obligations imposed by a state or federal agency or undertakes actions that result in a violation of state or federal law.” (Section 125.022, FS) ENVIRONMENTAL Reserved PLANNING Reserved WATER MANAGEMENT Reserved 9.A.2.b Packet Pg. 384 Attachment: Attachment A - Proposed Ordinance (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) 9.A.2.cPacket Pg. 385Attachment: Attachment B - Community School of Naples PMC - response letter with attachment 6-28-19 (17682 : PL20210000731 Community 9.A.2.cPacket Pg. 386Attachment: Attachment B - Community School of Naples PMC - response letter with attachment 6-28-19 (17682 : PL20210000731 Community 9.A.2.cPacket Pg. 387Attachment: Attachment B - Community School of Naples PMC - response letter with attachment 6-28-19 (17682 : PL20210000731 Community RE: PUD Minor Change, Community School of Naptes PUD, PMC-PL2O21OOO1 .l83 Dear Mr. Gallander: This letter is in response to your application submifted on May 14,2021 tot administrative approval of a minor refinement to the adopted community school of Naples cFpuD Master plan pursuant to Section 10.02.13.E.3.a ofthe Land Development Code (LDC). The proposed changes are as follows: 1. Demolition of existing maintenance building; and relocating and constructing new maintenance building to the northwestern section of the pUD; and2. Construction of dining facility, performance center, playground area, service facility area, and beach volleyball courts. From the information shown on the CFPUD Master plan, last revised June lo, 2021 it is the opinion of staff that the proposed minor refinements are consistent with the collier county drolvth Management Plan and with the criteria contained in the LDC citation noted abovs allowing administrative approval of minor changes to an approved Master plan. Therefore, I have approved the requested minor revisions as noted above. This administrative approval does not relieve the project from compliance with all applicable federal, state and local regulations and procedures. A copy of this letter and the attached Community School of Naples CFPUD Master Plan will be filed with the adopted PUD documents. You may wish to have this letter and the attached Master plan recorded in the official records of Collier County as a permanent record of this administrative approval. t Qov*rXy lf you need further jnformation or assislance, please contact me al2\g-2s2-4312 or via email at Timothy. Finn@colliercountyfl .gov. Attachment: Revised GFPUD Master plan for community school of Naples, revised date June 10, 2021. Laurie Beard, PUD monitoring Mark Templeton, Landscape Review cc: zoning Division. zoning services section.2goo North Horseshoe Drive. Napres, FL 34.104.239-2s2-s603 Growth Management Department - Planning & Regulation Zoning Division - Zoning Services Section June 16,2021 Mr. Kenrick S. Gallander, AICP RWA, lnc. 6610 Willow Park Drive Naples, FL 34109 Sincerely,e-;-.\4.:. Timothy Finn, AICP Principal Planner, Zoning Services 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 388 Attachment: Attachment C - Community School of Naples PMC - response letter with attachment 6-16-21 (17682 : PL20210000731 Community EXISTING LAKE EXISTING PRESERVE (1.66 AC) NAPLES PROGRESSIVE GYMNASTICS CAMP ST NON ST P A, AGRICULTURE CU CF A, AGRICULTURE CU THE EXISTING PRESERVE SATISFIES LANDSCAPING & BUFFER REQUIREMENTS 4 L RPUD RSF-3 X PUD ST NON ST L L L L CF CF CF CF L A, AGRICULTURE 1 2 1 2 3 L ACTIVITY CENTER EXISTI N G T R A C K AND FI E L D FIELD HOUSE NORRIS POOL PRESS BOXEXISTING PRESERVE (1.66 AC) BASEBALL FIELD SOFTBALL FIELD AQUATIC CENTER MEDIA CENTER TENNIS COURTS SCIENCE BLDG PRACTICE FIELD MANCHESTER SQUARE PU BARRON COLLIER HIGH SCHOOL CYPRESS GLEN CU P THE EXISTING PRESERVE SATISFIES LANDSCAPING & BUFFER REQUIREMENTS NOTE: THE PETITIONER OWNS APPROXIMATELY 3.95 ACRES ADJACENT AND WEST OF THE PROPOSED CFPUD BOUNDARY ATHLETIC FIELD STUDENT ACTIVITY CENTER LOWER SCHOOL FUTURE FACILITY DEVELOPMENT AREA MAINTENANCE BUILDING PERFORMANCE CENTER BEACH VOLLEYBALL COURTS LOWER SCHOOL DINING FACILITY PLAYGROUND AREA SERVICE FACILITY AREA LAND USE SUMMARY TRACT LAND USE ACREAGE TRACT "CF"COMMUNITY FACILITY 71.39 TRACT "P"PRESERVE 1.66 TOTAL 73.05 6610 Willow Park Drive, Suite 200Naples, Florida 34109(239) 597-0575 FAX: (239) 597-0578www.consult-rwa.comFlorida Certificates of AuthorizationEB 7663 LB 6952 P CF L X ST CFPUD MASTER PLAN NOTES 1 PRESERVE REQUIREMENT PRESERVE REQUIREMENT REQUIRED PRESERVE PRESERVE PROVIDED 15% OF EXISTING NATIVE VEGETATION (1.66 ACRES)0.25 ACRES 1.66 ACRES 9.A.2.d Packet Pg. 389 Attachment: Attachment C - Community School of Naples PMC - response letter with attachment 6-16-21 (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) Page 1 6610 Willow Park Drive, Suite #200, Naples, FL 34109 | (239) 597-0575 | Fax (239) 597-0578 www.consult-rwa.com K:\2009\090288.00.29 CSN - Service Rd Alignment & Spoon Parcel\04 PUDA Application Support\Working Docs, Submittal #2\QA -QC\Submittal #2 - 00 Response to Comments Letter FINAL.docx July 8, 2021 Intake Team Growth Management Division 2800 Horseshoe Drive North Naples, FL 34104 Subject: Community School of Naples - Submittal #2 Amendment to PUD (PUDA) PL2021000731 Dear Intake Team: Please accept this letter in response to your insufficiency letter dated June 23, 2021, for the above subject project. This letter outlines responses to each comment including stipulations. Please find the following list of information and materials that are being submitted electronically: 00. Response to Comments Letter 01. Revised Narrative Statement 02. Wellfield Risk Management Analysis 03. Updated Listed Species Survey 04. Black Bear Management Plan 05. Revised PUD Document (strikethrough and underline) 06. Revised PUD Document (clean) 07. Revised PUDA Application 08. Revised Boundary Survey In reply to your review comments, we offer the following responses in bold: Rejected Review: Comprehensive Planning Review, Sue Faulkner 1. Adding 3.95 acres to the CFPUD, increases the intensity of the site. Please address FLUE Policies 5.3, 5.6 and 7.1-7.4 in a separate document with your next submittal. Response: Please see the attached revised Narrative Statement – Requirement “c” on page 3 addressing FLUE Policies 5.3, 5.6, and 7.1 – 7.4. 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 390 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) Page 2 6610 Willow Park Drive, Suite #200, Naples, FL 34109 | (239) 597-0575 | Fax (239) 597-0578 www.consult-rwa.com Rejected Review: Environmental Review, Tabatha Cole 1. Identify and provide analysis of the Wellfield Risk Management Special Treatment Zone located within the project boundary (LDC 3.06.08 and 3.06.12.I) Response: Please see the attached Wellfield Risk Management Analysis. 2. Address the Florida Black Bear in the Listed Species Survey and provide an aerial with all FWC nuissance reports within a 1 mile radius of the project site. Response: Please see attached updated Listed Species Survey and Black Bear Management Plan. Attached within the Listed Species Survey is a GIS map which includes 17 nuisance bear reports within a 1-mile radius of the site. The Florida Black Bear has been included in an attached update of the listed species survey and a Black Bear Management Plan (also attached) has been added to the other wildlife management plans. 3. Provide aerial with species specific protective zones near or overlapping the project site. Response: Please see attached updated Listed Species Survey. Included are GIS maps species specific protective/consultation zone near the project site. The site falls within the Woodstork Core Foraging Area, the Red-Cockaded Woodpecker Consultation Area, the American Crocodile Consultation Area, the Florida Bonneted Bat Consultation Area, and the Florida Scrub Jay Consultation Area. No known eagle nests, woodstork colonies or panther telemetry have been identified within the project boundaries. Rejected Review: Zoning Review, Timothy Finn 1. In the PUD Document, update the revised site plan with the master site plan approved via the 6-16-21 Community School of Naples (PMC) letter through petition PL20210001183. Response: Please see attached revised PUD Document for the updated revised CFPUD Master Plan. 2. At the preapp meeting, it was discussed that a water retention lake was proposed for the "spoon parcel." as well as the parking/driveway access. However, the Narrative Statement in the request section indicates potential new facilities. If a water retention lake is proposed, please add this use to the CF section in Exhibit A of the PUD document. Response: Please see attached revised PUD Document (strikethrough and underline and clean versions). 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 391 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) Page 3 6610 Willow Park Drive, Suite #200, Naples, FL 34109 | (239) 597-0575 | Fax (239) 597-0578 www.consult-rwa.com 3. In the Application, include the name and mailing address of all registered Home Owners Association's that could be affected by the application. Response: Please see attached Revised PUDA Application indicating those Homeowner’s Associations that could be affected by the application based on the information provided by the County’s Civic Associations and Communities website. It appears, the Cypress Glen Master Association and Manchester Square Master Association should be registered with the County but are not. To ensure compliance with the intent of this requirement, we have provided their information as well. Rejected Review: County Attorney Review, Heidi Ashton -Cicko 1. County Attorney review will commence with Submittal 2. If all County staff approve Submittal 1, the County Attorney's office will be notified and submittal 1 will be reviewed. Response: Understood. Rejected Review: Engineering Surveyor Review, Marcus Berman 1. Please fix the north arrow as it's pointed in the wrong direction and resubmit boundary survey with all 3 pages. Response: Please see the revised boundary survey with corrected north arrow and all pages. General Comments, Timothy Flynn 1. Please be advised that pursuant to the LDC, a petition can be considered closed if there has been no activity on the petition for a period of six (6) months. In addition, a GMP Amendment application that is a companion item can likewise be considered closed. That six months period will be calculated from the date of this letter. Response: Understood. 2. Additional comments or stipulations may be forthcoming once a sufficient petition has been submitted for review. This correspondence should not be construed as a position of support or non-support for any issues within the petition. Staff will analyze the petition and the recommendation will be contained in the staff report prepared for the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) or Hearing Examiner (HEX). Response: Understood. 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 392 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) Page 4 6610 Willow Park Drive, Suite #200, Naples, FL 34109 | (239) 597-0575 | Fax (239) 597-0578 www.consult-rwa.com 3. Please ensure that all members of your team that may testify before the HEX or CCPC and the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) are registered as lobbyists with the County pursuant to the regulations regarding that issue. Response: Understood. 4.When addressing review comments, please provide a cover letter outlining your response to each comment. Include a response to all comments. Response: Understood. 5. Please put revised dates on all exhibits and in the title block of all Plans. The PUD document should include a footer that reflects the project name, petition number, date and page X of Y for the entire document. Documents without this information will be rejected. Response: Understood. 6. A partial resubmittal cannot be accepted; please do not resubmit until you can respond to ALL review comments. Response: Understood. 7. Public hearings cannot be held until the Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM) criteria has been met. In some petition types a NIM must be held while other petition types only require the agent to send a letter. All letters and newspaper ads must be pre-approved by the county planner. For additional information about the process please contact me. Please note that the NIM must be held at least 15 days prior to the first hearing. As you prepare for that meeting, please be aware of the following items: a) Please provide the required NIM notice affidavit and its attachments prior to the meeting (in compliance with the LDC); and b) Please post signs to direct attendees to the exact meeting location; and c) Please ensure that there is sound amplification equipment available and working for this meeting. If there is no permanent equipment, please bring a tested/working portable microphone; and d) You must provide a written synopsis of the meeting that includes a list of all questions and answers as well as providing the audio/video tape; and e) Please prepare documents for hand out to all NIM attendees and the public hearing file, that show the differences in the uses that would be allowed in the existing and proposed zoning districts. This request is based upon recent CCPC direction. 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 393 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) Page 5 6610 Willow Park Drive, Suite #200, Naples, FL 34109 | (239) 597-0575 | Fax (239) 597-0578 www.consult-rwa.com Response: Understood. 8. Pursuant to F.S. 125.022, exhibits and application materials are subject to review upon each resubmittal until deemed sufficient and complete. Should the project receive a third request for additional information, staff requests that the applicant provide written acknowledgement with the resubmittal to waive the regulation that restricts the County from requesting additional information. Projects that do not include such written acknowledgement and that fail to address any outstanding review items with the 4th submittal will be denied/recommended for denial. Response: Understood. 9. Note the adopted fee schedule requires payment of additional fees for petition review upon the 5th and subsequent submittals; please contact the appropriate staff and resolve issues to avoid this fee. Response: Understood. 10. If you would like to discuss the review comments, require clarification and/or wish to identify agree - to-disagree issues, a post-review meeting can be arranged including all rejecting reviewers. To schedule a post-review meeting, please contact me, and Zoning Operations staff wi ll proceed with scheduling. Response: Understood. Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM) Documents Hosting a Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM) is required for this application type. To resolve this condition, please upload all supporting NIM documents from meeting to the GMD Public Portal. Contact Planner of this project for additional questions. If you experience issues uploading, please contact Client Services at (239) 252- 1036. Response: Understood. Informational Comments The subject site is designated Urban, Urban Mixed Use District, partially Urban Residential Subdistrict and partially in the Livingston -Pine Ridge Commercial Infill Subdistrict Inset on the Future Land Use Map of the Growth Management Plan. The Community School of Napl es CFPUD is being amended to add 3.95 acres to the 73-acre site for a new total of 77-acres. This new area will allow for the construction of a new dining hall, performance/training facility, maintenance building and more. A SDPA petition (PL20210000798) is currently under review. Response: Understood. 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 394 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) Page 6 6610 Willow Park Drive, Suite #200, Naples, FL 34109 | (239) 597-0575 | Fax (239) 597-0578 www.consult-rwa.com Schools and school facilities are listed as the fifth allowable non-residential use in the Urban Designation Section of the Future Land Use Element of the Growth Management Plan. This project uses are consistent with the FLUE of the GMP. Response: Understood. There will be an increase to the intensity of this previously approved project. Please address FLUE Policies 5.3, 5.6, and 7.1-7.4 in a separate document and include with next submittal. Response: Understood. Please reference the prior comment requesting this information. We trust the enclosed information is sufficient for your review and approval. Should you have any questions or require additional information, please contact our office at (239) 597-0575. Sincerely, RWA, Inc. Kendrick S. Gallander, AICP Director of Planning Attachments: Application Submittal Requirements (listed above) cc: Mr. Paul Selvidio Mr. Richard Yovanovich, Esq. RWA File: 090288.00.29 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 395 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) Revised 7-7-21 Page 1 6610 Willow Park Drive Suite 200 Naples, FL 34109 | (239) 597-0575 | Fax (239) 597-0578 www.consult-rwa.com K:\2009\090288.00.29 CSN - Service Rd Alignment & Spoon Parcel\04 PUDA Application Support\Working Docs, Submittal #2\QA -QC\Submittal #2 - 01 Narrative Statement_2021-06-29 FINAL.docx NARRATIVE STATEMENT Community School of Naples – Project Boundary Modification A PUD Amendment (PUDA) PL20210000731 Background: The subject property is a ±77.00-acre parcel of land (Property ID No.: 00256320000) located along Livingston Road, north/northwest of the Honda of Naples Dealership at the intersection of Livingston Road and Pine Ridge Road (See Figure 1.). The specific address is 13275 Livingston Rd, Naples, FL 34109-3859. The owner of the subject property and applicant for this Planned Unit Development Minor Change (PMC) is Community School of Naples, Inc. The subject property is the Community School of Naples (CSN), which is a PreK – 12 college preparatory educational campus currently with over 21 educational/administrative buildings, support facilities, and various athletic facilities. The Future Land Use Designation is Urban ; Urban Mixed-Use District; Urban Residential Subdistrict (partial) and Livingston-Pine Ridge Commercial Infill Subdistrict (partial) as provided on the Future Land Use Map (FLUM) of the Collier County Growth Management Plan (GMP). The current zoning district is Community Facility Planned Unit Development (CFPUD). Figure 1. Subject Property Location Map 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 396 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) Page 2 6610 Willow Park Drive Suite 200 Naples, FL 34109 | (239) 597-0575 | Fax (239) 597-0578 www.consult-rwa.com Request: The Community School of Naples (CSN) is seeking an amendment to the CSN Community Facility Planned Unit Development (CFPUD) approved in 2012 under Ordinance No. 12-05. The amendment is seeking to revise the CFPUD Master Plan to alter the CFPUD boundary to include the remaining 3.95± acres of land, zoned Residential Single Family – 3 (RSF-3) and which is under ownership by the Community School of Naples. Including this portion of land will result in land area of the CFPUD boundary to be 77.00 ± acres, and thus, consistent with the subject property parcel area. The additional 3.95± acres into the CFPUD boundary will be designated as part of the overall CF Tract and is intended to provide for relocated parking/driveway access as shown on the revised Master Plan (PUD Document - Exhibit C) to support the schools’ facilities as well as any potential new facilities the school may need in the future. This PUDA petition is concurrent with a prior submitted Planned Unit Development Minor Change (PMC) petition (PL20210001183) amending the existing Master Plan to allow for construction of a new dining hall, performance/training facility, maintenance building, playground area, service facility area, and beach volleyball courts based on a Site Development Plan Amendment (SDPA) petition also currently under review by Collier County (PL20210000798). The following addresses the requirements listed under land development code (LDC) Sec. 10.02.13 B, 10.02.08 F and Chapter 3 G. of the Administrative Code for consideration of this Planned Unit Development Amendment (PUDA). a. The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer, water, and other utilities. The portion of property proposed for inclusion in the CFPUD boundary is vacant, with a current zoning designation of RSF-3. The property for inclusion in the CFPUD is bounded by residential development to the south, public schools to the west and north, and the Community School of Naples to the east. See Table 1 below. Zoning District Land Use North RSF - 3 Public School South PUD Residential – Multi-family East CFPUD Private School West RSF - 3 Public School This PUDA is proposed to relocate existing parking and accessways to be incorporated within the CFPUD boundary. This proposed use is consistent with the CFPUD customary uses and surrounding the areas consisting of residential and school development patterns. Inclusion of the 3.95± acre property into the 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 397 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) Page 3 6610 Willow Park Drive Suite 200 Naples, FL 34109 | (239) 597-0575 | Fax (239) 597-0578 www.consult-rwa.com CFPUD and thus rezoning the property from RSF-3 to CFPUD will allow for a more efficient use of the overall property under CSN ownership and is consistent and compatible with the abutting uses bounding the project site. All necessary utility infrastructure is in place adjacent to the subject property to support the proposed CFPUD development. b. Adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of any proposed agreements, contract, or other instruments, or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as t hey may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense. Findings and recommendations of this type shall be made only after consultation with the county attorney. The applicant, Community School of Naples, Inc., is the owner of the entire 77.00+/- acre subject property. Operation and maintenance responsibility for private areas and facilities have been assigned to Community School of Naples, Inc. Further, the CFPUD documents make appropriate provisions, if applicable, for the continued operation and maintenance of common areas. c. Conformity of the proposed PUD with the goals, objectives, and policies of the Growth Management Plan. (This is to include identifying what Sub -district, policy or other provision allows the requested uses/density, and fully explaining/addressing all crit eria or conditions of that Sub-district, policy or other provision.) The subject property is located within the Urban Future land Use Designation; Urban Mixed-Use District; Urban Residential Subdistrict (partial) and Livingston-Pine Ridge Commercial Infill Subdistrict (partial) as provided on the FLUM of the Collier County Growth Management Plan (GMP). The purpose of the Urban Mixed-Use Subdistrict is to accommodate a variety of residential and non-residential land uses, including Planned Unit Developments (PUD), such as the existing Community School of Naples Community Facility Planned Unit Developments (CFPUD) approved under Ordinance No. 12-5. Schools and school facilities are identified as an allowable use in the Urban FLUM designation of the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) of the GMP. The proposed PUDA to expand the boundary of the CSN CFPUD by 3.95± acres will continue to comply and be consistent with the Growth Management Plan (GMP) per Ordinance No. 12-5. More specifically, the existing CFPUD and the proposed expansion portion of the subject property into the CFPUD is located in an Urban designated area with existing urban services and existing infrastructure to support the proposed permitted uses listed i n the CFPUD document. Thus, the proposed amendment is consistent with Policy 5.3 of the GMP. 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 398 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) Page 4 6610 Willow Park Drive Suite 200 Naples, FL 34109 | (239) 597-0575 | Fax (239) 597-0578 www.consult-rwa.com Policy 5.6 of the GMP states, “New developments shall be compatible with, and complementary to, the surrounding land uses, as set forth in the Land Development Code (Ordinance 04-41, adopted June 22, 2004, and effective October 18, 2004, as amended).” The proposed expansion of the CFPUD boundary by 3.95± acres is compatible both internally and externally to the surrounding land uses. To the north and west of the subject property abuts vacant land owned by the Collier County Public School District. South of the property is the Cypress Glenn multi-family residential development. To the east is the existing Community School of Naples’ (CSN) campus. A portion of the existing CFPUD boundary and CSN facilities abuts the Cypress Glen residential development. Based on the approved CFPUD, it has been proven the provided buffers and development standards currently in place ensure the CSN CFPUD is compatible and complementary to the surrounding residential development. The same buffer and development standards will be applied to the additional portion of the new subject property along its southern perimeter abutting the Cypress Glen multi-family residential. The proposed addition property into the CFPUD will adhere to the uses permitted within the approved PUD document. It will therefore continue to be compatible and complementary to the surrounding land uses and consistent with Policy 5.6 of the GMP. The 3.95± acre expansion of the existing 73± acre CFPUD is consistent with FLUE Policies 7.1 through 7.4. All existing access connections to collector and arterials are already in place where the opportunity exists, and no new connections are proposed in conjunction with the additional property being added to the CFPUD boundary. All existing connections have been deemed consistent with Policy 7.1 through approval of the original CFPUD document. The proposed amended PUD boundary will not result in any additional traffic associated with the school’s future development. The proposed additional to the CFPUD will be developed to provide proper internal interconnections within the campus and ensure no unnecessary trips onto the local street network. Therefore, reducing vehicle congestion and a reduced need for traffic signalization. The Community School of Naples is a private institution, and such connections at this time are not suitable or feasible and would impact the safety and security of the students. The existing campus provides walkable infrastructure, civic space and facilities and will continue to do so with this addition. The Community School of Naples’ campus has been developed and will continue to be designed to provide for a pedestrian environment inclusive of open civic spaces and facilities to encourage continued walkability. The addition to the CFPUD boundary will not affect the ability to continue to adhere to such provisions. d. The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening requirements. As previously stated, the property is bounded by residential development to the south and school development to the north, west, and east. The existing CFPUD was found to be compatible with the same surrounding residential and school uses under Ordinance No. 12-5. Thus, the inclusion of the adjacent 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 399 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) Page 5 6610 Willow Park Drive Suite 200 Naples, FL 34109 | (239) 597-0575 | Fax (239) 597-0578 www.consult-rwa.com 3.95± acres of land within the CFPUD boundary maintains the compatibility with the surrounding area. Additionally, the proposed expanded CFPUD boundary will be screened along the property lines to west and south with landscaped buffers to further ensure compatibility between any future school facilities and surrounding uses. e. The adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the development. The existing approved CFPUD and subsequent site development approvals have adequately indicated and provided the usable open space to properly serve the development and compliment the surrounding community. f. The timing or sequence of development for t he purpose of assuring the adequacy of available improvements and facilities, both public and private. Public and private improvements and facilities are currently available and being used by the Community School of Naples. Payment of impact fees and timing of adequate public facilities certification are mechanisms to assure any future development is appropriately serviced. g. The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion. The inclusion of the 3.95± acres within the existing CFPUD boundary is appropriate as it is a logical opportunity for potential future development associated with the existing Community School of Naples. The overall subject property and the portion of property for inclusion are and will be served by adequate public facilities and will continue to provide the community with a high performing and quality educational option. h. Conformity with PUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the particular case, based on determination that such modifications of justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations. The proposed amendment conforms with the intent of the PUD regulations by ensuring the established development regulations applicable to the amended CFPUD boundary remain consistent with similar developments adjacent to and throughout Collier County. The requested PUDA will help improve the future development opportunities CSN envisions to support the school while in turn not causing any adverse impact to the public health, safety, and welfare. 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 400 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliercounty.gov (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 March 4, 2020 Page 1 of 11 Application for a Public Hearing for PUD Rezone, Amendment to PUD or PUD to PUD Rezone PETITION NO PROJECT NAME DATE PROCESSED PUD Rezone (PUDZ): LDC subsection 10.02.13 A.-F., Ch. 3 G. 1 of the Administrative Code Amendment to PUD (PUDA): LDC subsection 10.02.13 E. and Ch. 3 G. 2 of the Administrative Code PUD to PUD Rezone (PUDR): LDC subsection 10.02.13 A.-F. APPLICANT CONTACT INFORMATION Name of Property Owner(s): _________________________________________________________ Name of Applicant if different than owner: _____________________________________________ Address: _________________________City: _______________ State: _________ ZIP: ___________ Telephone: _______________________ Cell: ______________________ Fax: __________________ E-Mail Address: ____________________________________________________________________ Name of Agent: ___________________________________________________________________ Firm: _____________________________________________________________________________ Address: ____________________________City: _______________ State: _______ ZIP: __________ Telephone: ____________________ Cell: ____________________ Fax: _______________________ E-Mail Address: ____________________________________________________________________ Be aware that Collier County has lobbyist regulations. Guide yourself accordingly and ensure that you are in compliance with these regulations. To be completed by staff 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 401 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliercounty.gov (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 March 4, 2020 Page 2 of 11 REZONE REQUEST This application is requesting a rezone from: _________________________ Zoning district(s) to the ________________________________ zoning district(s). Present Use of the Property: _________________________________________________________ Proposed Use (or range of uses) of the property: _________________________________________ Original PUD Name: ________________________________________________________________ Ordinance No.: ____________________________________________________________________ PROPERTY INFORMATION On a separate sheet attached to the application, provide a detailed legal description of the property covered by the application: •If the request involves changes to more than one zoning district, the applicant shall include a separate legal description for property involved in each district; •The applicant shall submit 4 copies of a recent survey (completed within the last six months, maximum 1" to 400' scale), if required to do so at the pre-application meeting; and •The applicant is responsible for supplying the correct legal description. If questions arise concerning the legal description, an engineer's certification or sealed survey may be required. Section/Township/Range: / / Lot: Block: Subdivision: ___________________________________________________ Metes & Bounds Description: _________________________________________________________ Plat Book: Page #: Property I.D. Number: ____________________________________ Size of Property: _______ ft. x _______ ft. = ________ Total Sq. Ft. Acres: _________ Address/ General Location of Subject Property: __________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________ PUD District (refer to LDC subsection 2.03.06 C): Commercial Residential Community Facilities Industrial Mixed Use Other: ________________ 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 402 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliercounty.gov (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 March 4, 2020 Page 3 of 11 ADJACENT ZONING AND LAND USE Zoning Land Use N S E W If the owner of the subject property owns contiguous property please provide a detailed legal description of the entire contiguous property on a separate sheet attached to the application. Section/Township/Range: / / Lot: Block: Subdivision: ___________________________________________________ Plat Book: Page #: Property I.D. Number: ____________________________________ Metes & Bounds Description: _________________________________________________________ ASSOCIATIONS Required: List all registered Home Owner Association(s) that could be affected by this petition. Provide additional sheets if necessary. Information can be found on the Board of County Commissioner’s website at http://www.colliergov.net/Index.aspx?page=774. Name of Homeowner Association: _________________________________________________ Mailing Address: ____________________________ City: _________ State: ______ ZIP: ______ Name of Homeowner Association: _________________________________________________ Mailing Address: ____________________________ City: _________ State: ______ ZIP: ______ Name of Homeowner Association: _________________________________________________ Mailing Address: ____________________________ City: _________ State: ______ ZIP: ______ Name of Homeowner Association: _________________________________________________ Mailing Address: ____________________________ City: _________ State: ______ ZIP: ______ Name of Homeowner Association: _________________________________________________ Mailing Address: ____________________________ City: _________ State: ______ ZIP: ______ 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 403 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliercounty.gov (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 March 4, 2020 Page 4 of 11 EVALUATION CRITERIA Pursuant to LDC subsections 10.02.13 B, 10.02.08 F and Chapter 3 G. of the Administrative Code, staff’s analysis and recommendation to the Planning Commission, and the Planning Commission’s recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners shall be based upon consideration of the applicable criteria. On a separate sheet attached to the application, provide a narrative statement describing the rezone request with specific reference to the criteria below. Include any backup materials and documentation in support of the request. a.The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer, water, and other utilities. b.Adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of any proposed agreements, contract, or other instruments, or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at pu blic expense. Findings and recommendations of this type shall be made only after consultation with the county attorney. c.Conformity of the proposed PUD with the goals, objectives and policies of the Growth Management Plan. (This is to include identifying what Sub-district, policy or other provision allows the requested uses/density, and fully explaining/addressing all criteria or conditions of that Sub-district, policy or other provision.) d.The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which c onditions may include restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening requirements. e.The adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the development. f.The timing or sequence of development for the purpose of assuring the adequacy of available improvements and facilities, both public and private. g.The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion. h.Conformity with PUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the particular case, based on determination that such modifications of justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations. Deed Restrictions: The County is legally precluded from enforcing deed restrictions; however, many communities have adopted such restrictions. You may wish to contact the civic or property owners association in the area for which this use is being requested in order to asce rtain whether or not the request is affected by existing deed restrictions. 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 404 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliercounty.gov (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 March 4, 2020 Page 5 of 11 Previous land use petitions on the subject property: To your knowledge, has a public hearing been held on this property within the last year? If so, what was the nature of that hearing? __________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________ Official Interpretations or Zoning Verifications: To your knowledge, has there been an official interpretation or zoning verification rendered on this property within the last year? Yes No if so please provide copies. PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIREMENTS This land use petition requires a Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM), pursuant to Chapter 3 E. of the Administrative Code and LDC section 10.03.06. Following the NIM, the applicant will submit a written summary and any commitments that have been made at the meeting. Refer to Chapter 8 B. of the Administrative Code for the NIM procedural requirements. Chapter 8 of the Administrative Code requires that the applicant must remove their public hearing advertising sign(s) after final action is taken by the Board of County Commissioners. Based on the Board's final action on this item, please remove all public hearing advertising sign(s) immediately. RECORDING OF DEVELOPER COMMITMENTS Within 30 days of adoption of the Ordinance, the owner or developer (specify name) at their expense shall record in the Public Records of Collier County a Memorandum of Understanding of Developer Commitments or Notice of Developer Commitments that contains the legal description of the property that is the subject of the land use petition and contains each and every commitment of the owner or developer specified in the Ordinance. The Memorandum or Notice shall be in form acceptable to the County and shall comply with the recording requirements of Chapter 695, FS. A recorded copy of the Memorandum or Notice shall be provided to the Collier County Planned Unit Development Monitoring staff within 15 days of recording of said Memorandum or Notice. LDC subsection 10.02.08 D This application will be considered “open” when the determination of “sufficiency” has been made and the application is assigned a petition processing number. The application will be considered “closed” when the petitioner withdraws the application through written notice or ceases to supply necessary information to continue processing or otherwise actively pursue the rezoning, amendment or change, for a period of 6 months. An application deemed “closed” will not receive further processing and an applicati on “closed” through inactivity shall be deemed withdrawn. An application deemed “closed” may be re-opened by submission of a new application, repayment of all application fees and the grant of a determination of “sufficiency”. Further review of the request will be subject to the then current code. 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 405 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliercounty.gov (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 March 4, 2020 Page 6 of 11 STATEMENT OF UTILITY PROVISIONS FOR PUD REZONE REQUEST APPLICANT CONTACT INFORMATION Name of Applicant(s): _______________________________________________________________ Address: _________________________________ City: ___________ State: ________ ZIP: _______ Telephone: ____________________ Cell: _____________________ Fax: ______________________ E-Mail Address: ____________________________________________________________________ Address of Subject Property (If available): ______________________________________________ City: _________________ State: ________ ZIP: _________ PROPERTY INFORMATION Section/Township/Range: / / Lot: Block: Subdivision: ___________________________________________________ Metes & Bounds Description: _________________________________________________________ Plat Book: Page #: Property I.D. Number: ____________________________________ TYPE OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL TO BE PROVIDED Check applicable system: a.County Utility System b.City Utility System c.Franchised Utility System Provide Name: __________________________ d.Package Treatment Plant (GPD Capacity): _________________________ e.Septic System TYPE OF WATER SERVICE TO BE PROVIDED Check applicable system: a.County Utility System b.City Utility System c.Franchised Utility System Provide Name: __________________________ d.Private System (Well) Total Population to be Served: ________________________________________________________ Peak and Average Daily Demands: A. Water-Peak: _________ Average Daily: __________ B. Sewer-Peak: _________ Average Daily: __________ If proposing to be connected to Collier County Regional Water System, please provide the date service is expected to be required: ____________________________________________________ 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 406 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliercounty.gov (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 March 4, 2020 Page 7 of 11 Narrative statement: Provide a brief and concise narrative statement and schematic drawing of sewage treatment process to be used as well as a specific statement regarding the method of affluent and sludge disposal. If percolation ponds are to be used, then percolation data and soil involved shall be provided from tests prepared and certified by a professional engineer. __________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________ Collier County Utility Dedication Statement: If the project is located within the service boundaries of Collier County’s utility service system, a notarized statement shall be provided agreeing to dedicate the water distribution and sewage collection facilities within the project area to the Collier County Utilities. This shall occur upon completion of the construction of these facilities in accordance with all applicable County ordinances in effect at that time. This statement shall also include an agreement that the applicable system development charges and connection fees will be paid to the County Utilities Division prior to the issuance of building permits by the County. If applicable, the statement shall contain an agreement to dedicate the appropriate utility easements for serving the water and sewer systems. __________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________ Statement of Availability Capacity from other Providers: Unless waived or otherwise provided for at the pre-application meeting, if the project is to receive sewer or potable water services from any provider other than the County, a statement from that provider indicating adequate capacity to serve the project shall be provided. 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 407 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliercounty.gov (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Page 8 of 11 COVENANT OF UNIFIED CONTROL The undersigned do hereby swear or affirm that we are the fee simple titleholders and owners of recor d of property commonly known as ____________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________ (Street address and City, State and Zip Code) and legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto. The property described herein is the subject of an application for ______________ planned unit development (______________PUD) zoning. We hereby designate___________________, legal representative thereof, as the legal representatives of the property and as such, these individuals are authorized to legally bind all owners of the property in the course of seeking the necessary approvals to develop. This authority includes, but is not limited to, the hiring a nd authorization of agents to assist in the preparation of applications, plans, surveys, and studies necessary to obtain zoning approval on the site. These representatives will remain the only entity to authorize development activity on the property until such time as a new or amended covenant of unified control is delivered to Collier County. The undersigned recognize the following and will be guided accordingly in the pursuit of development of the project: 1.The property will be developed and used in conformity with the approved master plan including all conditions placed on the development and all commitments agreed to by the applicant in connection with the planned unit development rezoning. 2.The legal representative identified herein is responsible for compliance with all terms, conditions, safeguards, and stipulations made at the time of approval of the master plan, even if the property is subsequently sold in whole or in part, unless and until a new or amended covenant of unified control is delivered to and recorded by Collier County. 3.A departure from the provisions of the approved plans or a failure to comply with any requirements, conditions, or safeguards provided for in the planned unit development process will constitute a violation of the Land Development Code. 4.All terms and conditions of the planned unit development approval will be incorporated into covenants and restrictions which run with the land so as to provide notice to subsequent owners that all development activity within the planned unit development must be consistent with those terms and conditions. 5.So long as this covenant is in force, Collier County can, upon the discovery of noncompliance with the terms, safeguards, and conditions of the planned unit development, seek e quitable relief as necessary to compel compliance. The County will not issue permits, certificates, or licenses to occupy or use any part of the planned unit development and the County may stop ongoing construction activity until the project is brought in to compliance with all terms, conditions and safeguards of the planned unit development. ___________________________________ Owner ___________________________________ Printed Name ___________________________________ Owner ____________________________________ Printed Name STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER The foregoing instrument was acknowleged before me by means of physical presence or online notarization this ____ day of _______________, 20___, by (printed name of owner or qualifier)_________________________________________ Such person(s) Notary Public must check applicable box: Are personally known to me Has produced a current drivers license ________________ Has produced ______________________ as identification. Notary Signature:_________________________________________ March 4, 2020 Notary Seal 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 408 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliercounty.gov (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 March 4, 2020 Page 9 of 11 Final Submittal Requirement Checklist for: PUD Rezone- Ch. 3 G. 1 of the Administrative Code Amendment to PUD- Ch. 3 G. 2 of the Administrative Code PUD to PUD Rezone- Ch. 3 G. 1 of the Administrative Code The following Submittal Requirement checklist is to be utilized during the Pre-Application Meeting and at time of application submittal. At final submittal, the checklist is to be completed and submitted with an up-to-date application. Please provide the submittal items in the exact order listed below, with cover sheets attached to each section. Incomplete submittals will not be accepted. A Model PUD Document is available online at http://www.colliercountyfl.gov/Home/ShowDocument?id=76983. REQUIREMENTS # OF COPIES REQUIRED NOT REQUIRED Cover Letter with Narrative Statement including a detailed description of why amendment is necessary 1 Completed Application with required attachments (download latest version) 1 Pre-application meeting notes 1 Affidavit of Authorization, signed and notarized 1 Property Ownership Disclosure Form 1 Notarized and completed Covenant of Unified Control 1 Completed Addressing Checklist 1 Warranty Deed(s) 1 List Identifying Owner and all parties of corporation 1 Signed and sealed Boundary Survey 1 Architectural Rendering of proposed structures 1 Current Aerial Photographs (available from Property Appraiser) with project boundary and, if vegetated, FLUCFCS Codes with legend included on aerial. 1 Statement of Utility Provisions 1 Environmental Data Requirements pursuant to LDC section 3.08.00 1 Environmental Data Requirements collated into a single Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) packet at time of public hearings. Coordinate with project planner at time of public hearings. Listed or Protected Species survey, less than 12 months old. Include copies of previous surveys. 1 Traffic Impact Study 1 Historical Survey 1 School Impact Analysis Application, if applicable 1 Electronic copy of all required documents 1 Completed Exhibits A-F (see below for additional information)+ List of requested deviations from the LDC with justification for each (this document is separate from Exhibit E) Checklist continues on next page 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 409 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliercounty.gov (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 March 4, 2020 Page 10 of 11 Revised Conceptual Master Site Plan 24” x 36”and One 8 ½” x 11” copy Original PUD document/ordinance, and Master Plan 24” x 36” – Only if Amending the PUD Revised PUD document with changes crossed thru & underlined 1 Copy of Official Interpretation and/or Zoning Verification 1 *If located in Immokalee or seeking affordable housing, include an additional set of each submittal requirement +The following exhibits are to be completed on a separate document and attached to the application packet:  Exhibit A: List of Permitted Uses  Exhibit B: Development Standards  Exhibit C: Master Plan- See Chapter 3 E. 1. of the Administrative Code  Exhibit D: Legal Description  Exhibit E: List of Requested LDC Deviations and justification for each  Exhibit F: List of Development Commitments If located in RFMU (Rural Fringe Mixed Use) Receiving Land Areas Pursuant to LDC subsection 2.03.08.A.2.a.2.(b.)i.c., the applicant must contact the Florida Forest Service at 239- 690-3500 for information regarding “Wildfire Mitigation & Prevention Plan.” PLANNERS – INDICATE IF THE PETITION NEEDS TO BE ROUTED TO THE FOLLOWING REVIEWERS: School District (Residential Components): Amy Lockheart Conservancy of SWFL: Nichole Johnson Utilities Engineering: Eric Fey Parks and Recreation: Barry Williams (Director) Emergency Management: Dan Summers Immokalee Water/Sewer District: City of Naples: Robin Singer, Planning Director Other: City of Naples Utilities Other: ASSOCIATED FEES FOR APPLICATION  Pre-Application Meeting: $500.00  PUD Rezone: $10,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre  PUD to PUD Rezone: $8,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre  PUD Amendment: $6,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre  Comprehensive Planning Consistency Review: $2,250.00  Environmental Data Requirements-EIS Packet (submittal determined at pre-application meeting): $2,500.00  Listed or Protected Species Review (when an EIS is not required): $1,000.00  Transportation Review Fees: o Methodology Review: $500.00 *Additional fees to be determined at Methodology Meeting. o Minor Study Review: $750.00 o Major Study Review $1,500.00 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 410 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 411 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) Legal Description A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTH QUARTER (1/4) CORNER OF SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE S89°30'40"E FOR 1386.36 FEET ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (1/4) OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) OF SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) OF SAID SECTION 12; THENCE N00°05'00"W FOR 85.00 FEET ALONG THE WEST LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) OF SECTION 12, TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE ORDER OF TAKING DESCRIBED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 2660, PAGE 3356 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, ALSO BEING THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE PARCEL DESCRIBED HEREIN; THENCE CONTINUE ALONG THE WEST LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) OF SECTION 12, N00°05'00"W FOR 1235.06 FEET, TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) OF SAID SECTION 12; THENCE N00°05'25”W FOR 1015.36 FEET ALONG THE WEST LINE OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) OF SECTION 12; THENCE N00°10'26"W FOR 304.90 FEET, TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) OF SAID SECTION 12; THENCE N00°29'43"W FOR 1219.68 FEET ALONG THE WEST LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) OF SAID SECTION 12, TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY OF A 100 FOOT WIDE PUBLIC SCHOOL ACCESS DRIVE, ALSO KNOWN AS OSCEOLA TRAIL; THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY OF OSCEOLA TRAIL, THE FOLLOWING TWO (2) DESCRIBED COURSES: 1) THENCE S89°33'47"E FOR 200.20 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENTIAL CURVE; 2) THENCE 172.82 FEET ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 285.00 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 34°44'37", AND WHOSE LONG CHORD BEARS S72°11'28"E FOR A DISTANCE OF 170.19 FEET, TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON-TANGENTIAL CURVE; THENCE LEAVING SAID SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY OF OSCEOLA TRAIL FOR THE FOLLOWING NINE (9) DESCRIBED COURSES: 1) THENCE 7.88 FEET ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 45.00 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 10°01'58", AND WHOSE LONG CHORD BEARS S80°03'03"W FOR A DISTANCE OF 7.87 FEET; 2) THENCE S36°05'39"W FOR 106.66 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON -TANGENTIAL CURVE; 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 412 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) 3) THENCE 34.38 FEET ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 45.00 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 43°46'28", AND WHOSE LONG CHORD BEARS S24°44'15"E FOR A DISTANCE OF 33.55 FEET, TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON-TANGENTIAL CURVE; 4) THENCE 36.47 FEET ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 155.04 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 13°28'44", AND WHOSE LONG CHORD BEARS S39°53'07"E FOR A DISTANCE OF 36.39 FEET, TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON-TANGENTIAL CURVE; 5) THENCE 71.28 FEET ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 120.00 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 34°02'08", AND WHOSE LONG CHORD BEARS S50°36'17"E FOR A DISTANCE OF 70.24 FEET; 6) THENCE S67°37'21"E FOR 62.82 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENTIAL CURVE; 7) THENCE 59.78 FEET ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 120.00 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 28°32'32", AND WHOSE LONG CHORD BEARS S81°53'37"E FOR A DISTANCE OF 59.16 FEET; 8) THENCE N83°50'03"E FOR 23.32 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENTIAL CURVE; 9) THENCE 54.37 FEET ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 35.00 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 89°00'31", AND WHOSE LONG CHORD BEARS N39°19'12"E FOR A DISTANCE OF 49.07 FEET, TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON-TANGENTIAL CURVE, ALSO BEING A POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID OSCEOLA TRAIL; THENCE THE FOLLOWING TWO (2) DESCRIBED COURSES ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID OSCEOLA TRAIL: 1) THENCE 244.65 FEET ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 385.00 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 36°24'34", AND WHOSE LONG CHORD BEARS S71°21'30"E FOR A DISTANCE OF 240.56 FEET; 2) THENCE S89°33'47"E FOR 306.64 FEET, TO A POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH THE WESTERLY RIGHT- OF-WAY LINE OF LIVINGSTON ROAD (COUNTY ROAD 881); AS SHOWN ON THE ROADWAY PLANS, COUNTY PROJECT NO. 62071; THENCE ALONG SAID WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF LIVINGSTON ROAD, THE FOLLOWING FOUR (4) DESCRIBED COURSES: 1) THENCE S00°50'38"E FOR 134.04 FEET; 2) THENCE N89°10'59"E FOR 10.00 FEET; 3) THENCE S00°50'38"E FOR 783.66 FEET, TO A BREAK POINT IN SAID WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF LIVINGSTON ROAD, AS OFFSET FROM THE EASTERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID SECTION 12; 4) THENCE S00°17'36"E FOR 1316.08 FEET, TO A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) OF SAID SECTION 12; THENCE N89°30'32"W FOR 235.06 FEET ALONG SAID NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) OF SAID SECTION 12, TO A POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH THE 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 413 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) WESTERLY BOUNDARY OF THE EAST 510 FEET OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) OF SAID SECTION 12; THENCE S00°17'18"E FOR 521.25 FEET ALONG SAID WESTERLY BOUNDARY OF THE EAST 510 FEET OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) OF SECTION 12; THENCE LEAVING SAID WESTERLY BOUNDARY OF THE EAST 510 FEET OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) OF SECTION 12, N89°31'12"W FOR 181.55 FEET; THENCE S00°10'47"E FOR 139.04 FEET, TO A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH HALF (1/2) OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) OF SAID SECTION 12; THENCE N89°31'23"W FOR 591.69 FEET ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH HALF (1/2) OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) OF SAID SECTION 12; THENCE LEAVING SAID NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH HALF (1/2) OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) OF SAID SECTION 12, S00°05'41"E FOR 575.60 FEET, TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE ORDER OF TAKING DESCRIBED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 2660, PAGE 3356 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE N89°21'57"W FOR 99.95 FEET, ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID ORDER OF TAKING, TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE PARCEL HEREIN DESCRIBED; CONTAINING 3,181,995 SQUARE FEET OR 73.0 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS AND RESTRICTIONS OF RECORD. TOGETHER WITH A TRACT OF LAND AS DESCRIBED IN OR. BOOK 4835, PAGE 1992, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORID A PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCE AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE RUN N00°17'55"W ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 12, FOR A DISTANCE OF 1320.72 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 12, THENCE RUN N89°33'10"W ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 12, FOR A DISTANCE OF 1381.30 FEET, TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 12 AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE PARCEL OF LAND HEREIN DESCRIBED: THENCE N.89°33'10"W., ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTH EAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 12, FOR A DISTANCE OF 392.33 FEET; THENCE RUN N.00°26'55"E., FOR A DISTANCE OF 12.01 FEET; THENCE RUN N.17°16'31"W., FOR A DISTANCE OF 26.91 FEET; 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 414 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) THENCE RUN N.36°52'48"E., FOR A DISTANCE OF 28.14 FEET; THENCE RUN N.02°14'11"E., FOR A DISTANCE OF 37.24 FEET; THENCE RUN N.20°59'45"E., FOR A DISTANCE OF 55.86 FEET; THENCE RUN N.55°57'35"E., FOR A DISTANCE OF 32.58 FEET; THENCE RUN N.25°35'56"E., FOR A DISTANCE OF 38.53 FEET; THENCE RUN N.14°12'06"E., FOR A DISTANCE OF 30.40 FEET; THENCE RUN N.38°03'22"E., FOR A DISTANCE OF 56.97 FEET; THENCE RUN N.33°34'22"E., FOR A DISTANCE OF 39.53 FEET; THENCE RUN N.40°13'55"E., FOR A DISTANCE OF 35.17 FEET; THENCE RUN N.35°12'04"W., FOR A DISTANCE OF 28.99 FEET; THENCE RUN N.00°25'59"E., FOR A DISTANCE OF 25.97 FEET; THENCE RUN N.67°39'55"E., FOR A DISTANCE OF 17.60 FEET; THENCE RUN N.47°42'44"E., FOR A DISTANCE OF 47.16 FEET; THENCE RUN N.16°23'23"E., FOR A DISTANCE OF 26.84 FEET; THENCE RUN N.56°27'41"E., FOR A DISTANCE OF 41.75 FEET; THENCE RUN N.48°06'59"E., FOR A DISTANCE OF 18.71 FEET; THENCE RUN S.79°43'39"E., FOR A DISTANCE OF 10.31 FEET; THENCE RUN N.77°03'32"E., FOR A DISTANCE OF 26.10 FEET; THENCE RUN N.79°57'37"E., FOR A DISTANCE OF 52.16 FEET; THENCE RUN N.00°04'22"W., FOR 505.22 FEET TO A POINT ON A CIRCULAR CURVE; CONCAVE SOUTHERLY, WHOSE RADIUS POINT BEARS S.17°20'34"E., A DISTANCE OF 169.00 FEET THEREON, THENCE RUN EASTERLY, ALONG SAID ARC OF SAID CURVE TO THE RIGHT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 169.00 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 17°55'05" AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD OF 52.64 FEET AT A BEARING OF N.81°38'58"E., FOR A DISTANCE OF 52.85 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EAST LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 12; THENCE RUN S.00°05'53"E., ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 12, FOR A DISTANCE OF 1015.12 FEET, TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; CONTAINING 172,105.56 SQUARE FEET OR 3.951 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. THIS PROPERTY IS SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS, RESERVATIONS OR RESTRICTIONS OF RECORDS. BEARINGS REFER TO THE EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 49, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AS BEING N00°17'55"W. 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 415 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 416 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 417 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 418 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 419 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) 9.A.2.ePacket Pg. 420Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 421 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 422 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) 9.A.2.ePacket Pg. 423Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 424 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 425 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 426 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 427 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 428 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 429 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 430 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 431 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 432 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 433 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 434 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 435 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 436 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 437 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 438 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 439 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 440 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) 6610 Willow Park Drive Suite 200 Naples, FL 34109 | (239) 597-0575 | Fax (239) 597-0578 www.consult-rwa.com K:\2009\090288.00.29 CSN - Service Rd Alignment & Spoon Parcel\04 PUDA Application Support\Working Docs, Submittal #2\QA -QC\Submittal #2 - 02 Wellfield Risk Management Analysis.docx WELLFIELD RISK MANAGEMENT ANALYSIS Community School of Naples – Project Boundary Modification A PUD Amendment (PUDA) PL20210000731 The Community School of Naples CFPUD is located within the W-4 Wellfield Risk Management Special Treatment Overlay Zone located wholly within the City of Naples Coastal Ridge Well Field. According to LDC Sec. 3.06.03.D, this zone consists of “The land area between zone W-3 and the 100 percent groundwater capture zone for the twenty (20) year planning limit, which is the twenty (20) year wellfield risk management special treatment overlay zone boundary, as shown on the wellfield risk management special treatment overlay zone map, Illustration 3.06.02 A, which area may be protected from the discharge or accidental release of s pecific contaminants, including the discharge or accidental release of hazardous products and hazardous wastes.” LDC Sec. 3.06.12.I - Existing and future nonresidential use, handling, storage, generation, transport, or processing of hazardous products. 2. In zone GWP, all future and existing nonresidential development involving the use, handling, storage, generation, transport, or processing of hazardous product below the thresholds stated in section 3.06.12(I)(1), and all future and existing nonresidential development in zones W-4 and GWP involving the generation or storage of hazardous waste at or above the thresholds stated in section 3.06.12(I)(2) hereof, shall not be required to obtain a certificate to operate, but shall comply with the following: a. No hazardous product shall be discharged or released to any stormwater treatment system. b. No hazardous product shall be discharged or released to any on -site sewage disposal system not permitted for industrial or manufacturing use. c. No hazardous product shall be discharged or released to any wastewater treatment system not permitted for industrial waste. d. No hazardous product shall be discharged or released to the surface of the land or into any water constituting or connecting to waters of the state defined in Chapter 403, F.S. e. All hazardous products shall be retained on-site until use. f. All hazardous products shall be stored in rainproof and leakproof containers. g. Discharges or accidental release of hazardous product exceeding fifty (50) gallons shall be reported to the County within forty-eight (48) hours of discovery. The report shall indicate the date, time, product discharged or released, control measures used, quantity of product discharged or released, and disposition of recovered product. Any future additions to the CFPUD will continue to comply with these regulations. 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 441 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 442 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 443 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) COMMUNITY SCHOOL OF NAPLES LISTED SPECIES SURVEY UPDATE JUNE 2021 PREPARED BY: TURRELL, HALL & ASSOCIATES, INC. 3584 EXCHANGE AVENUE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 643-0166 marielle@thanaples.com 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 444 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) Community School of Naples CFPUD – Spoon Parcel Addition Section 12, Township 49 South, Range 25 East, Collier County. Listed Species Survey June 2021 Update 2 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Community School of Naples CFPUD encompasses a total of approximately 73 acres of Section 12, Township 49 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. An additional 3.95 acres of wooded land is proposed for addition to the 73 acres, known as the Spoon Parcel. An amendment to the PUD is proposed for the purposes of adding structures to the west campus and minor parking on the 3.95-acre parcel. This listed species survey was conducted on the 3.95-acre Spoon Parcel, which can be characterized as primarily palmetto and pine flatwood habitat with moderate to low exotic species coverage and two wetland habitats with little to no exotic species present. In addition to natural habitat, there is also a 0.03-acre filled and permitted but unpaved roadway between the Community School and Osceola Elementary School, which was never paved. The first wetland can be described as pine, cypress, cabbage palm with laurel oak and it is located immediately west and north of the large natural upland habitat. A mixed wetland hardwood habitat comprised of buttonwood, pop ash and coastal willow, primarily, is located on the slender ‘handle’ of the parcel, separated from the southern wetland by the small bisecting roadway. Access to this parcel is primarily via a west campus side road, via a gate off Osceola Trail. To consider potential effects of the proposed project on any state or federally listed species that may utilize the property for feeding/foraging and/or nesting, a Threatened and Endangered Species Survey was performed. This report summarizes the results of the survey activities that have been undertaken to-date on the subject parcel. Ongoing survey time will continue through the various permitting stages and prior to construction commencement. 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 445 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) Community School of Naples CFPUD – Spoon Parcel Addition Section 12, Township 49 South, Range 25 East, Collier County. Listed Species Survey June 2021 Update 3 2.0 METHODOLOGY Prior to any wildlife survey, careful consideration is given to the habitat type(s) in question and species that are known to utilize such areas. Before any survey is carried out a number of publications and references are consulted. These include: The Official List of Florida’s Endangered Species, Threatened Species and Species of Special Concern (latest dated December 2018), Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWCC) Wildlife Methodology Guidelines, The Standardized State-Listed Animal Survey Procedures for SFWMD ERP Projects, and the Florida Natural Areas Inventory (FNAI) for Collier County. The basic objective of any wildlife survey is to obtain evidence that a listed species is using the subject site. The site may comprise a primary or secondary feeding/foraging or nesting zone or merely be adjacent to those sites for a particular listed species. As many species of concern in Florida are cryptic/camouflaged and/or nocturnal/ crepuscular, patience and sufficient time must be devoted to the survey. Aerial photos and FLUCFCS mapping are consulted prior to arriving on-site and a system of meandering transects is followed throughout the subject area. The most recent field study traversed the entire site in a series of transects spaced approximately 25 to 50 feet apart. Fieldwork for this update is out lined below in Table 1. A slow pace along transects was maintained, stopping every few minutes to look and listen for movement or calls of any animal. Indirect evidence such as rooting, scrape marks, nests, cavities, burrows, tracks, and scat were also noted. Special consideration was given to tree-top observation for potential fox squirrel daybeds or nests and tree cavities. The project site is within Florida bonneted bats (FBB) consultation area, so care was given cavity searches and other potential FBB roosting locations. A list of dates and times of wildlife surveys for this latest effort is provided, along with observed species below. 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 446 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) Community School of Naples CFPUD – Spoon Parcel Addition Section 12, Township 49 South, Range 25 East, Collier County. Listed Species Survey June 2021 Update 4 3.0 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Table 1- Site survey information Date Time Ambient Conditions Staff 4/23/21 15:35- 18:30 85°F, mostly sunny, winds 10-15 mph Marielle Nageon de Lestang 5/3/21 15:10- 18:27 91°F, partly cloudy, winds 5-10 mph Marielle Nageon de Lestang 5/5/21 7:05- 10:28 80°F, sunny, winds 0-8 mph Marielle Nageon de Lestang 5/6/21 7:00- 10:20 82°F, sunny, winds 5-10 mph Marielle Nageon de Lestang A list of all wildlife species observed on or adjacent to the site during the course of this and previous surveys is provided below. COMMON NAME SCIENTIFIC NAME LISTING STATUS Birds mourning dove Zenaida macroura None red-bellied woodpecker Melanerpes carolinus None pileated woodpecker (heard) Dryocopus pileatus None cardinal Cardinalis cardinalis None turkey vulture * Cathartes aura None unidentified warblers Mammals nine-banded armadillo burrow Dasypus novemcinctus None marsh rabbit Sylvilagus palustris None cottontail rabbit Sylvilagus floridanus None grey squirrel Sciurus carolinensis None raccoon scat Procyon lotor None Butterflies monarch butterfly Danaus plexippus None *Observed on adjacent properties or flying overhead. One cavity tree was located in the wetland area right on the western property line in a dead slash pine. The tree cavity will be peeped during future survey updates and again prior to any construction commencement even though it lies far outside the impact area. A list of species that would be expected to occur on the subject site can be given through analysis of known vegetative communities both on-site and contiguous, and available background data. Sources include the US Fish & Wildlife Service (FWS) Multi Species Recovery Plan, Part 2, Appendix C, Species of Concern, and their Respective 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 447 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) Community School of Naples CFPUD – Spoon Parcel Addition Section 12, Township 49 South, Range 25 East, Collier County. Listed Species Survey June 2021 Update 5 Community Types in South Florida, in addition to communication with personnel at state and federal wildlife agencies. Vegetative communities are presented by FLUCFCS code with numbers in accordance with the supporting map (Exhibit 2) together with potential wildlife species. Consideration of the suitability and likelihood for a given community to support a particular species is given in light of adjacent and contiguous land uses. Abbreviations used in the discussion are as follows: F = Federal S = State E = Endangered T = Threatened SSC = Florida Species of Special Concern C = Federal Candidate *= FWS Species of Management Concern ** = Protected Under Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act R = Rare Appendix C lists potential species within the community types below in Tables 2 and 3. Table 2- Potential Species for Scrubby Flatwoods or Mesic Flatwoods FLUCFCS 321/411- Palmetto Prairie/ Pine Flatwood (Scrubby-Mesic Flatwoods) Common Name Scientific Name Federal Status State Status Florida panther Puma concolor coryi FE SE Big Cypress fox squirrel Sciurus niger avicennia * ST Sherman’s fox squirrel Sciurus niger shermani * ST Florida black bear Ursus americanus floridanus FC ST Florida sandhill crane Antigone canadensis pratensis ST Florida scrub jay Aphelocoma coerulescens FT ST Florida bonneted bat Eumops floridanus FE SE southeastern American kestrel Falco sparverius paulus * ST bald eagle Haliaetus leucocephalus ** ** red-cockaded woodpecker Picoides borealis FE SE Audubon’s crested caracara Polyborus plancus audubonii FT ST Kirtland’s warbler Setophaga kirtlandii FE SE eastern indigo snake Drymarchon corais couperi FT ST gopher tortoise Gopherus polyphemus C ST None of the above listed were noted utilizing this parcel or flying overhead. 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 448 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) Community School of Naples CFPUD – Spoon Parcel Addition Section 12, Township 49 South, Range 25 East, Collier County. Listed Species Survey June 2021 Update 6 Table 3- Potential Species for Hydric Pine Flatwoods FLUCFCS 617 & 624/610- Mixed Wetland Hardwood & Pine, Cypress, Cabbage Palm/ Wetland Hardwood (Hydric Pine Flatwoods) Common Name Scientific Name Federal Status State Status Sherman’s short-tailed shrew Blarina carolinensis shermani * ST Everglade’s mink Neovison vison evergladensis ST Florida panther Puma concolor coryi FE SE Big Cypress fox squirrel Sciurus niger avicennia * ST Sherman’s fox squirrel Sciurus niger shermani * ST Florida black bear Ursus americanus floridanus FC ST roseate spoonbill Platalea ajaja ST Florida sandhill crane Antigone canadensis pratensis ST Florida scrub jay Aphelocoma coerulescens FT ST little blue heron Egretta caerulea ST tricolor heron Egretta tricolor ST Florida bonneted bat Eumops floridanus FE SE southeastern American kestrel Falco sparverius paulus * ST bald eagle Haliaetus leucocephalus ** ** woodstork Mycteria americana FE SE red-cockaded woodpecker Picoides borealis FE SE Audubon’s crested caracara Polyborus plancus audubonii FT ST Everglade’s snail kite Rostrhamus sociabilis FE SE Kirtland’s warbler Setophaga kirtlandii FE SE eastern indigo snake Drymarchon corais couperi FT ST gopher tortoise Gopherus polyphemus C ST None of the above listed were noted utilizing this parcel or flying overhead. Listed species maps have been included as exhibits to this report which identify nearest locations of known nests, colonies, sightings, telemetry, complaints, consultation areas, etc. The closest listed species within a documented database are as follows: • bald eagle nest- approximately 1.6 miles southwest • panther telemetry- approximately 5.7 miles due south • woodstork nesting colony- approximately 8.5 miles northeast • nuisance black bear calls- approximately 0.25 miles northeast, east, and due south 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 449 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) Community School of Naples CFPUD – Spoon Parcel Addition Section 12, Township 49 South, Range 25 East, Collier County. Listed Species Survey June 2021 Update 7 4.0 SUMMARY The existing condition of the subject site is primarily mesic palmetto and pine flatwood, with transitional wetland on the extreme outer ring and wetland to the north of the disturbed roadway. Evidence of hydrology depicts water elevations up to 13 or 14 inches in the wetland areas, but the soil plugs were too dry to sample properly indicating flashing hydrological conditions. Exotic species coverage is highest to the southern end of the site, but none exceeds 50-60% in any location. Special interest in the property as Big Cypress fox squirrel habitat was considered during the survey efforts. Investigation of the site in the course of this study has shown that the property offers, at best, limited use potential for any wildlife due to the flashy hydrology and its proximity to various roads and schools. There are no known bird rookeries or red-cockaded nesting colonies in the vicinity of this site, and telemetry has documented Florida panther over five miles away at the closest. Black bear nuisance calls within a mile of the site have been prevalent however, so a Florida black bear species management plan has been included. The site does fall within a number of U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service consultation areas including the woodstork core foraging area, the Florida crocodile consultation area, the Florida bonneted bat consultation area, the red-cockaded consultation area, and the Florida scrub jay consultation area. Development of the subject site is not expected to result in detrimental impacts to state or federally listed wildlife species, primarily because surrounding activities and altered hydrology, as outlined above, have reduced the sites’ ability to support populations of listed species. It does have the potential to hose non-listed resident and transient species though. Preservation and enhancement of the native preserve area will continue to provide feeding/foraging opportunities for all species currently utilizing the area. Habitat Management Plans have been created and will be implemented. These plans call for site-specific management activities to take place that will improve habitat value for the target species and protect potential species utilizing the site during construction activities. These plans are provided as part of the Spoon Parcel PUDA application. 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 450 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) STATE OF FLORIDACOUNTY AERIAL VICINITY MAPSTATE OF FLORIDACOUNTY AERIAL VICINITY MAPNOTES:<> THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SUBJECTPROPERTYSUBJECTPROPERTY<> LATITUDE:N 26.219004<> LONGITUDE:W -81.754284SITE ADDRESS:<> 13275 LIVINGSTON RD NAPLES, FL 34109Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@thanaples.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\21074.00 community school spoon parcel\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\21074-COUNTY-PUD.dwg LOCATION MAP 5/19/2021THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY:CHANGED:SHEET NO.:RY NO. 5875MNRMJ05-19-2121074.00-1225COMMUNITY SCHOOL OF NAPLESLOCATION MAP49-------------------01 OF 08COLLIER COUNTYCOLLIER COUNTYGULF OF MEXICOGULF OF MEXICO8588288641MARCOISLANDEVERGLADESCITY9329846NAPLES90908399483783784129292983983992887846951862I-758486431856850846890896NESWKEY WESTTAMPAFT.MYERSMIAMINAPLESSUBJECTPROPERTY9.A.2.ePacket Pg. 451Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of N E S W0200400 800SCALE IN FEETTurrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@thanaples.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\21074.00 community school spoon parcel\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\21074-COUNTY-PUD.dwg FLUCFCS MAP 5/19/2021THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY:CHANGED:SHEET NO.:RY NO. 5875MNRMJ05-19-2121074.00-1225COMMUNITY SCHOOL OF NAPLESFLUCFCS MAP49-------------------03 OF 08UPLAND (ACRES):WETLAND (ACRES):PROJECT (ACRES):3.953.260.69·SURVEY COURTESY OF:··SURVEY DATED:NOTES:·THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY ANDARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE."RWA, INC."03-08-21SUBJECT PROPERTY(SPOON PARCEL)740617624/610E1624/610E1624/610E1321/411E2SPOON PARCELFLUCFCSDESCRIPTIONAREA(AC)321/411E2PALMETTO PRAIRIES/PINE FLATWOODSEXOTICS 25-60%3.23617MIXED WETLAND HARDWOODS0.40624/610E1CYPRESS - PINE - CABBAGE PALM/WETLAND HARDWOOD FORESTSEXOTICS 0-25%0.29740DISTURBED LAND0.03TOTAL3.95PROPERTY BOUNDARY(MAIN PARCEL)170EXISTINGNATIVEHABITATMAIN PARCELFLUCFCSDESCRIPTIONAREA(AC)170INSTITUTIONAL71.34617EXISTING NATIVE HABITAT PRESERVE1.66TOTAL73.00OSCEOLA TRAIL LIVINGSTON RDPINE RIDGE ROAD617 9.A.2.ePacket Pg. 452Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of N E S W0100200 400SCALE IN FEETTurrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@thanaples.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\21074.00 community school spoon parcel\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\21074-COUNTY-PUD.dwg LISTED SPECIES SURVEY MAP 5/19/2021THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY:CHANGED:SHEET NO.:RY NO. 5875MNRMJ05-19-2121074.00-1225COMMUNITY SCHOOL OF NAPLESLISTED SPECIES SURVEY MAP49-------------------07 OF 08·SURVEY COURTESY OF:··SURVEY DATED:NOTES:·THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY ANDARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE."RWA, INC."03-08-21SUBJECTPROPERTYPROPERTYBOUNDARYCAVITY TREE LAT: 26.215815LONG: -81.756676TRANSECT LINE(TYP)9.A.2.ePacket Pg. 453Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of #*#*#*#* #* #* #* #* #*#*#* #* #* #*#* #* #* OVERALL BOUN DARY SPO ON PROPERTY 1 MILE RADIUS Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Marine & Environmental Consulting 3484 Exchange Ave. Suite B. Naples, FL 34104-3732Email: tuna@thanaples.com Phone: (239) 643-0166 Fax: (239) 643-6632 COM MUNITY S CHO OL OF NAPLESRED-COCKADED W OODPECKERCONSULTATOIN MAP DRAWN BY: CREATED: JOB NO.: REVISION: SHEET:SECTION- TOWNSHIP- RANGE-12 49 25 RMJ 06-28-21 21074 N/A N/A N/A P:\21074.00 Community School SpoonParcel\GIS\21074-RCW_Consulatation.mxd FILE PATH: SCALE:1 "=0.3 mi Legend #*BL AC K BEAR CALL S (QTY: 17) ONE_MI_BUFFER OVERALL BOUN DARY SPO ON PROPERTY ¯ 0 1,5 00 3,0 00Ft 01 OF 01 SOURCE: BLACK BEAR RELATED CALLS (FWC 06-14-21) 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 454 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) ^_ ^_ ^_ ^_^_ ^_ ^_ ^_ ^_!(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !(!(!( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!(!( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !(!( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( !( OVERALL BOUN DARY SPO ON PROPERTY Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Marine & Environmental Consulting 3484 Exchange Ave. Suite B. Naples, FL 34104-3732Email: tuna@thanaples.com Phone: (239) 643-0166 Fax: (239) 643-6632 COM MUNITY S CHO OL OF NAPLESEAGLE NESTES & PANTHER TELEMETRY DRAWN BY: CREATED: JOB NO.: REVISION: SHEET:SECTION- TOWNSHIP- RANGE-12 49 25 RMJ 06-28-21 21074 N/A N/A N/A P:\21074.00 Community School SpoonParcel\GIS\21074-RCW_Consulatation.mxd FILE PATH: SCALE:1 "=0.95 mi Legend !(FLO RID A PANTHER TELEMETRY ^_EAG LE NESTS OVERALL BOUN DARY SPO ON PROPERTY ¯ 0 5,0 00 10,000Ft 01 OF 01SOURCE: PANTHER ELEMETRY (FWC 06-28-21), EAGLE NESTS (FWC 6-21-21) 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 455 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) ! OVERALL BOUN DARY SPO ON PROPERTY Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Marine & Environmental Consulting 3484 Exchange Ave. Suite B. Naples, FL 34104-3732Email: tuna@thanaples.com Phone: (239) 643-0166 Fax: (239) 643-6632 COM MUNITY S CHO OL OF NAPLESBONNETED BAT CONSULTATION MAP DRAWN BY: CREATED: JOB NO.: REVISION: SHEET:SECTION- TOWNSHIP- RANGE-12 49 25 RMJ 06-28-21 21074 N/A N/A N/A P:\21074.00 Community School SpoonParcel\GIS\21074-BAT_Consulatation.mxd FILE PATH: SCALE:1 "=0.95 mi Legend OVERALL BOUN DARY SPO ON PROPERTY BO NNETED BAT FO CAL AREAS BO NNETED BAT CON SU LTATION AREA ¯ 0 5,0 00 10,000Ft 01 OF 01 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 456 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) OVERALL BOUN DARY SPO ON PROPERTY Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Marine & Environmental Consulting 3484 Exchange Ave. Suite B. Naples, FL 34104-3732Email: tuna@thanaples.com Phone: (239) 643-0166 Fax: (239) 643-6632 COM MUNITY S CHO OL OF NAPLESRED-COCKADED W OODPECKERCONSULTATOIN MAP DRAWN BY: CREATED: JOB NO.: REVISION: SHEET:SECTION- TOWNSHIP- RANGE-12 49 25 RMJ 06-28-21 21074 N/A N/A N/A P:\21074.00 Community School SpoonParcel\GIS\21074-RCW_Consulatation.mxd FILE PATH: SCALE:1 "=0.3 mi Legend OVERALL BOUN DARY SPO ON PROPERTY RED -C OCKADED WOO DPECKER CO NSULTATOIN AREA ¯ 0 1,5 00 3,0 00Ft 01 OF 01 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 457 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) !( ! ! ! ! ! OVERALL BOUN DARY SPO ON PROPERTY 619018 Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Marine & Environmental Consulting 3484 Exchange Ave. Suite B. Naples, FL 34104-3732Email: tuna@thanaples.com Phone: (239) 643-0166 Fax: (239) 643-6632 COM MUNITY S CHO OL OF NAPLESACTIVE WOOD STORK COLONIES DRAWN BY: CREATED: JOB NO.: REVISION: SHEET:SECTION- TOWNSHIP- RANGE-12 49 25 RMJ 06-28-21 21074 N/A N/A N/A P:\21074.00 Community School SpoonParcel\GIS\21074-WOOD_STORKS.mxd FILE PATH: SCALE:1 "=3 mi Legend !(ACTIVE WO OD STO RK N ESTING C OLO NY WOO D STO RK CO RE FORAG ING AREA OVERALL BOUN DARY SPO ON PROPERTY ¯ 0 3 6Mi 01 OF 01 SOURCE: WOOD SOTRK COLONIES AND FORAGING AREAS (FWC 2019) 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 458 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) OVERALL BOUN DARY SPO ON PROPERTY Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Marine & Environmental Consulting 3484 Exchange Ave. Suite B. Naples, FL 34104-3732Email: tuna@thanaples.com Phone: (239) 643-0166 Fax: (239) 643-6632 COM MUNITY S CHO OL OF NAPLESSCRUB JAY CONSULTATOIN MAP DRAWN BY: CREATED: JOB NO.: REVISION: SHEET:SECTION- TOWNSHIP- RANGE-12 49 25 RMJ 06-28-21 21074 N/A N/A N/A P:\21074.00 Community School SpoonParcel\GIS\21074-SCRUB_JAY_Consulatation.mxd FILE PATH: SCALE:1 "=0.3 mi Legend OVERALL BOUN DARY SPO ON PROPERTY SCR UB JAY C ONSULTATIO N AREA ¯ 0 1,5 00 3,0 00Ft 01 OF 01 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 459 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) OVERALL BOUN DARY SPO ON PROPERTY Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Marine & Environmental Consulting 3484 Exchange Ave. Suite B. Naples, FL 34104-3732Email: tuna@thanaples.com Phone: (239) 643-0166 Fax: (239) 643-6632 COM MUNITY S CHO OL OF NAPLESCROCODILE CONSULTATION MAP DRAWN BY: CREATED: JOB NO.: REVISION: SHEET:SECTION- TOWNSHIP- RANGE-12 49 25 RMJ 06-28-21 21074 N/A N/A N/A P:\21074.00 Community School SpoonParcel\GIS\21074-CROC_Consulatation.mxd FILE PATH: SCALE:1 "=0.3 mi Legend OVERALL BOUN DARY SPO ON PROPERTY CROCO DILE CO NSULTATIO N AREA ¯ 0 1,5 00 3,0 00Ft 01 OF 01 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 460 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) COMMUNITY SCHOOL OF NAPLES FLORIDA BLACK BEAR SPECIES MANAGEMENT PLAN JUNE 2021 PREPARED BY: TURRELL, HALL & ASSOCIATES, INC. 3584 EXCHANGE AVENUE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 643-0166 marielle@thanaples.com 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 461 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) Florida Black Bear Species Management Plan Community School of Naples 2 1.0 INTRODUCTION This report provides project management guidelines for the avoidance of adverse interactions with Florida black bear (Ursus americanus floridanus) on the proposed Community School project. This document addresses the black bears’ background information along with their ecological and biological characteristics and habitat requirements. A description of how planning and site development has been guided in consideration of bears is given within the management plan. The plan briefly describes activities that will be undertaken or avoided to prevent encouraging black bears from entering the campus. 2.0 PROJECT LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION The Community School of Naples property is approximately 73± acres in size, located at 13275 Livingston Road approximately 0.13 miles north of Pine Ridge Road. The property is situated within Section 12, Township 49 South, Range 25 East, Collier, County, Florida. Access to school grounds occurs via a security gate just south of Osceola Trail or an entrance north of Pine Ridge Road situated between Cypress Glen Condominiums and the Sports Camp. The additional Spoon Parcel, which is proposed for partial construction onsite, lies on the southwestern-most side of the site and is best accessed via a gated pathway off Osceola Trail along the west side of the main campus and athletic fields. The applicant will be adding and developing 0.66 acres of a 3.95-acre parcel that was designated as “future phase” in earlier permits, making the total site size 77± acres. In addition to the new acreage, some features on the west campus will be added/changed. Proposed campus changes include a basketball court, a turf field, new lower school dining facility, new dumpster facility, and a relocated play area. The Spoon Parcel, which is currently wooded, would be impacted to slightly expand parking for the west school campus. 3.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS AND HABTIAT DESCRIPTIONS Vegetative communities of the newly added Spoon Parcel include upland palmetto/pine habitat and disturbed (filled) lands, as well as some laurel oak wetland and pine, cypress, cabbage palm wetland. The existing habitat types (based on FLUCFCS codes) are shown below. FLUCFCS Acreage WETLANDS Pine, Cypress, Cabbage Palm/Wetland Hardwood (15% Exotic) 624/610 E1 0.29 Mixed Wetland Hardwood 617 0.40 Total Wetland Habitat 0.69 UPLANDS Palmetto Prairie/Pine Flatwood (25-60% Exotic) 321/411 E2 3.23 Disturbed Land 740 0.03 Total Upland Habitat 3.26 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 462 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) Florida Black Bear Species Management Plan Community School of Naples 3 The habitat proposed for impact at this time is the Palmetto Prairie/ Pine Flatwood (321/411 E2) which is dominated by saw palmetto (Serenoa repens), slash pine (Pinus elliottii), downy-rose myrtle (Rhodomyrtus tomentosa), ear-leaf acacia (Acacia auriculiformis) and cocoplum (Chrysobalanus icaco). Remaining habitat set aside for future use is the same habitat as is being impacted. Jurisdictional wetland areas are the very western extend of the ‘spoon’ and in the ‘handle’ of the parcel. The wetland habitat is not slated for development. 4.0 FLORIDA BLACK BEAR The Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC) has reported over a dozen Florida black bear sightings in the general area around this project. No evidence of black bear utilization of the site has been verified but due to the presence in the vicinity that has been documented by FWC, appropriate measures must be taken to avoid future conflicts between bears and students or faculty. 4.1 Occurrence Onsite While no individuals of this state listed species were observed on site during the threatened and endangered species survey, the presence of suitable habitat allows the possibility that the site may be home to or part of the territory of the species. This management plan provides specific measures for species protection should an individual be located. 4.2 Biology Listed as a Threatened species by Florida Game and Freshwater Fish Commission (currently known as the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission) in 1974, the Florida black bear is typically the smallest subspecies of the American black bear. The Florida black bear is the largest land mammal in Florida, the average weights of females and males are 82 kg and 113 kg. Like all members of the bear family, black bears are large, powerful mammals with rounded ears, short tails, 5-toed feet, and large canine teeth. The species has black hair over the entire body with the occasional exceptions of a brown muzzle and a blonde chest patch. Florida black bears utilize a wide variety of vegetative communities. Important habitat types include pine flatwoods, hardwood swamp, cypress swamp, cabbage palm forest, sand pine scrub and mixed hardwood hammock. A combination of these communities is critical for food supply due to the seasonal changes of habitat use coupled with food response and availability. Bears follow a diet pattern linked to food availability with intense seasonal influence. They shift from herbaceous matter in early spring, to soft fruits in summer, to hard mast during fall. Important staples include saw palmetto fruits and hearts, the fruits of swamp tupelo, oaks, blueberry and gallberry make up approximately 80% of the bear’s diet. Insects, most importantly the honeybee, yellow jackets, and carpenter ants are regularly included in a normal diet. Small vertebrates taken occasionally consist of rabbit, armadillo, and raccoon while infrequently wild hog and white- tailed deer may also be taken. 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 463 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) Florida Black Bear Species Management Plan Community School of Naples 4 The breeding season for black bears runs from June to July, but cubs are not born until late January to early February; a total gestation period of about 7 months (215 days). Bears have delayed implantation, which halts fetal development at a very early stage until late November or early December, actual developmental gestation is only 6-8 weeks. Litters can contain from 2 to 4 cubs. Cubs separate from their mother when they are approximately 16-17 months old. Due to the size of its large home range, low population density and slow reproduction rate the Florida black bear is sensitive to excessive mortality. The main threat to population stability is through habitat loss. Expanding urbanization, agricultural development, and increasing use of the state’s wild lands for recreation all have resulted in an accelerated rate of habitat loss. 5.0 SITE DEVELOPMENT CONSIDERATIONS & SPECIES MANAGEMENT PROTOCOL There is a slough system to the west of the site which could provide a corridor for bear movement or limited habitat, however there are roads, schools, and residential communities on all sides of the slough. Reported nuisance bears within a 1-mile radius have been documented so human activities within the project could lure bears to the campus and result in adverse interactions with students and faculty. The FWC has promoted a Bear Awareness campaign for several years and have made available various informative brochures including a homeowner’s guide (Guide to Living in Bear Country) that outlines steps that can be taken to avoid impacting bears. FWC’s outlined protocol will be provided to the school. A few of the listed items include: • Properly storing garbage in lidded cans • Always clean grills and store them in secure areas immediately after use. To reduce negative encounters a bear the following are recommendations by FWC. If a bear is encountered FWC recommends the following: • Do not play dead. • Do not run from a bear. • Back away slowly with raised arms. • Do not make eye contact. • Speak in a calm and assertive voice. • Contact FWC (*FWC on a phone) to alert them to the nuisance bear’s location. 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 464 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) A guide to living in bear country Ashley Hockenberry MyF WC.com/BearEglin AFBSecure your garbage Store garbage in a secure area, such as a sturdy shed or garage, until the morning of pickup, or Build a small shed to store trash cans. Be sure there are no gaps along the shed’s edges and use screws. If the shed is curbside, call your waste service provider to ensure it will still service your trash cans, or Modify your regular trash can to make it bear-resistant by adding hardware. To be successful, the lid must not be flexible and the can must not collapse when you stand on its side. Call your waste service provider to ensure it will service a modified trash can, or Request a commercially manufactured bear- resistant trash can from your waste service provider. If they do not provide these cans, you can special order one from a hardware store, but ensure your waste service provider will service it. Funds from Florida’s “Conserve Wildlife” license plate help conserve bears and reduce human-bear conflicts. Buy one today through your local tax collector’s office or online at BuyAPlate.com. How FWC responds to conflicts The FWC addresses human-bear conflicts in a variety of ways, including providing technical assistance over the phone, conducting an in-person visit with the resident, using deterrents (such as an electric fence), attempting to scare the bear away, or, in rare cases, attempting to trap the bear. While most conflicts can be avoided by securing attractants, biologists assess each situation on a case-by-case basis and use FWC policies and guidelines to help decide on the most appropriate response. The earlier the FWC is notified, the more response options are available. The longer a conflict situation continues, the more likely the bear will develop behaviors that present a risk to public safety, such as entering a dwelling, harming a leashed dog or injuring a person. Once this happens, it is too late to try to change the bear’s behavior and it must be humanely killed.Milt FoxWhere bears live in Florida If you are experiencing bear conflicts, please contact the nearest FWC regional office. The sooner the FWC knows about bear activity, the more options are available to prevent a bear from becoming a public safety risk. North Central Lake City (386) 758-0525 Northeast Ocala (352) 732-1225 Northwest Panama City (850) 265-3676 South West Palm Beach (561) 625-5122 Southwest Lakeland (863) 648-3200 In an emergency or if you suspect illegal activity, call the Wildlife Alert Hotline at 888-404-FWCC (3922). Follow us on: MyF WC.com/Bear printed on recycled paper 8/2018 Warning! It is illegal to take, possess, injure, shoot, collect or sell black bears under Florida state law unless authorized by an FWC-issued permit. If you are found guilty, you could face fines and/or jail time. 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 465 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples Ashley HockenberryThe bear facts Black bears are the only species of bear in Florida. Biologists estimate approximately 4,000 black bears roam Florida today, compared to as few as 300 bears in the 1970s. Bears can pick up scents from over a mile away: that’s seven times better than a bloodhound and the best of any land mammal. Adult bears typically weigh between 150 to 400 pounds, with males often twice the size of females. Females have their first litter around 3 years of age, with one to three cubs born every other year. Breeding occurs from June to August, with cubs born around February 1. On average, females range over 15 square miles and males range over 60 square miles. A bear’s diet 15% Insects (termites, ants, bees, etc.) 80% Plants (fruits, nuts, berries, etc.) 5% Meat (opossums, armadillos, carrion, etc.) It is illegal to put out food or garbage that attracts bears and causes conflicts. Anything that attracts dogs, cats or raccoons also attracts bears! Bear behavior and you Black bears are shy and generally not aggressive. When seen near homes or workplaces, bears are often just passing through. When frightened, bears typically run away or climb a tree. If a bear is in a tree, it is either feeding or trying to escape danger. Keep people and pets away, and the bear will leave on its own, usually after dark. When a bear stands on its hind legs, it is trying to get a better view or scent. Black bears may huff, snap their jaws, swat the ground or “bluff charge” when cornered, threatened or defending food or young. If this happens, stop, hold your ground and then slowly back away. Remember bears are large, powerful, wild animals that can act unpredictably and become dangerous. Bears who receive food from people may lose their natural fear of them and are more likely to damage property or become a public safety risk. NEVER feed or attract bears. If a bear is eating something on your property, take note of what it is and secure it after the bear has left the area. Learn all about Florida’s bears and being BearWise at MyFWC.com/BearWise. BearWise tips: Never approach a bear. Keep as much distance between you and the bear as possible. If a bear changes its behavior because you’re there, you are too close. If you encounter a bear at close range, stand with arms raised, back up slowly and speak to the bear in a calm, assertive voice. Do not turn your back, play dead or run from a black bear. Make sure you are in a secure area, such as a car or building, and the bear has a clear escape route, then scare the bear away with loud noises, like yelling, blowing a whistle, or using an air or car horn. Install a motion-activated device, such as flood lights, a water sprinkler or audio alarm, to scare a bear away from a location when you are not present. Report any bear threatening the safety of people, pets or livestock, or causing property damage, to the F WC (see back cover). Walk dogs on a non-retractable leash and be aware of your surroundings. Dogs can trigger defensive behaviors from bears. Encourage your school system to use the Florida Black Bear Curriculum Guide. The guide is designed for grades 3 to 8 and is correlated to state education standards. Avoid attracting bears Bears do not hang around people if they do not find food. Properly storing or securing garbage and other attractants is a proven method of preventing bear conflicts. However, it takes a community-wide effort to keep bears wild and away from neighborhoods. Use electric fencing to protect gardens, garbage, compost piles, beehives, fruit trees and livestock. Keep garage doors closed when not in use. Feed pets indoors or bring food dishes (even empty ones) inside at night. Store pet and livestock feed in bear-resistant containers or inside a secure area. Remove or modify bird and wildlife feeders and ensure the ground is free of all feed debris. Properly harvest ripe nuts, fruits, and vegetables and remove rotten fruits and vegetables. Create an “unwelcome” mat by driving finishing nails, heads up, into a sheet of anchored plywood to keep bears away from a specific area, such as under a window, door or fence. Keep outdoor refrigerators and freezers in a secure location or lock up with super-adhesive anchors, like Marine Locks™. Clean meat smokers and barbeque grills with a degreasing detergent and store in a secure area. Dispose of food remnants/grease after each use. A screened-in porch will not keep bears out! Carry bear spray and learn how to use it properly, paying attention to wind direction, distance to bear (20-30 ft.) and your escape route. Make sure to buy spray designed for use on bears. 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 466 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples IF A BEAR IS… n Far away n Easily scared away n In a tree/standing up/passing through n Leaving scat, tracks or scratch marks on trees n Feeding on natural foods (acorns, berries, insects) Enjoy from a safe distance and never approach a bear. IF A BEAR IS… n Not scared away by loud noises n Eating food/garbage/pet food/birdseed when people are not present n Protecting food or cubs (charges, blocks food or cubs from people) Find a safe place, call the FWC Wildlife Alert Hotline to report the behavior. IF A BEAR IS… n Approaching people or pets n Lingering near human use areas n Entering a tent, building or vehicle n Physically making contact with a person n Eating food/garbage/pet food/birdseed when people are present Find a safe place, call the FWC Wildlife Alert Hotline and the manager should consider closing the area. Bear Behavior Levels FWC Wildlife Alert Hotline: 888-404-3922 or #FWC or *FWC from your mobile phone. In case of emergency, call 9-1-1. N O R MAL BEHAV I O R T H R E ATENIN GBEHAV I O R C O N C E RNIN GBEHAV I O R 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 467 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 468 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 469 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 470 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 471 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 252-5724 ADDRESSING CHECKLIST Please complete the following and email to GMD_Addressing@colliergov.net or fax to the Operations Department at 239-252-5724 or submit in person to the Addressing Department at the above address. Form must be signed by Addressing personnel prior to pre-application meeting, please allow 3 days for processing. Not all items will apply to every project. Items in bold type are required. FOLIO NUMBERS MUST BE PROVIDED. F orms older than 6 months will require additional review and approval by the Addressing Department. PETITION TYPE (Indicate type below, complete a separate Addressing Checklist for each Petition type) BL (Blasting Permit) BD (Boat Dock Extension) Carnival/Circus Permit CU (Conditional Use) EXP (Excavation Permit) FP (Final Plat LLA (Lot Line Adjustment) PNC (Project Name Change) PPL (Plans & Plat Review) PSP (Preliminary Subdivision Plat) PUD Rezone RZ (Standard Rezone) SDP (Site Development Plan) SDPA (SDP Amendment) SDPI (Insubstantial Change to SDP) SIP (Site Im provement Plan) SIPI (Insubstantial Change to SIP) SNR (Street Name Change) SNC (Street Name Change – Unplatted) T DR (Transfer of Development Rights) VA (Variance) VRP (Vegetation Removal Permit) VRSFP (Vegetation Removal & Site Fill Permit) OTHER LEGAL DESCRIPTION of subject property or properties (copy of lengthy description may be attached) FOLIO (Property ID) NUMBER(s) of above (attach to, or associate with, legal description if more than one) STREET ADDRESS or ADDRESSES (as applicable, if already assigned) PROPOSED STREET NAMES (if applicable) SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN NUMBER (for existing projects/sites only) 1 SURVEY (copy - needed only for unplatted properties) LOCATION MAP must be attached showing exact location of project/site in relation to nearest public road right- of-way PROPOSED PROJECT NAME (if applicable) SDP - or AR or PL # T49, R25, S12 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 472 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 252-5724 Please Return Approved Checklist By: Email Personally picked up Applicant Name: Signature on Addressing Checklist does not constitute Project and/or Street Name approval and is subject to further review by the Operations Department. FOR STAFF USE ONLY Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Approved by: Date: Updated by: Date: IF OLDER THAN 6 MONTHS, FORM MUST BE UPDATED OR NEW FORM SUBMITTED 2 Fax Email/Fax:Phone: Project or development names proposed for, or already appearing in, condominium documents (if application; indicate whether proposed or existing) 03/25/2021 00256320000 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 473 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 474 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) Community School of Naples Location Map Folio Number: 00256320000 Name: COMM SCHOOL OF NAPLES INC Street# & Name: 13275 LIVINGSTON RD Build# / Unit#: 032 / Legal Description: 12 49 25 COMM SE CNR OF SEC, RUN N 89 DEG W 1385.92FT, N 75FT TO POB, CONT N 1245.24FT, S 89 DEG E 2004. Collier County Property Appraiser. While the Collier County Property Appraiser is committed to providing the most accurate and up-to-date information, no warranties expressed or implied are provided for the data herein, its use, or its interpretation. 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 475 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 476 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 477 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) Community School of Naples A Community Facility Planned Unit Development List of Owner and all Parties of Corporation •Owner: COMMUNITY SCHOOL OF NAPLES, INC. 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 478 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 479 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 480 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) DINING HALL 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 481 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 482 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) MAINTENANCE BUILDING 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 483 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) TRAINING/PERFORMANCE CENTER 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 484 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 485 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) N E S W0 200 400800SCALE IN FEETTurrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@thanaples.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\21074.00 community school spoon parcel\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\21074-COUNTY-PUD.dwg FLUCFCS MAP 5/19/2021THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY: CHANGED:SHEET NO.:RY NO. 5875MNRMJ05-19-2121074.00-1225COMMUNITY SCHOOL OF NAPLESFLUCFCS MAP49-------------------03 OF 08UPLAND (ACRES):WETLAND (ACRES):PROJECT (ACRES):3.953.260.69·SURVEY COURTESY OF:··SURVEY DATED:NOTES:·THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY ANDARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE."RWA, INC."03-08-21SUBJECT PROPERTY(SPOON PARCEL)740617624/610E1624/610E1624/610E1321/411E2SPOON PARCELFLUCFCSDESCRIPTIONAREA(AC)321/411E2PALMETTO PRAIRIES/PINE FLATWOODSEXOTICS 25-60%3.23617MIXED WETLAND HARDWOODS0.40624/610E1CYPRESS - PINE - CABBAGE PALM/WETLAND HARDWOOD FORESTSEXOTICS 0-25%0.29740DISTURBED LAND0.03TOTAL3.95PROPERTY BOUNDARY(MAIN PARCEL)170EXISTINGNATIVEHABITATMAIN PARCELFLUCFCSDESCRIPTIONAREA(AC)170INSTITUTIONAL71.34-EXISTING NATIVE HABITAT PRESERVE1.66TOTAL73.00OSCEOLA TRAIL LIVINGSTON RDPINE RIDGE ROAD 9.A.2.ePacket Pg. 486Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliercounty.gov (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 March 4, 2020 Page 6 of 11 STATEMENT OF UTILITY PROVISIONS FOR PUD REZONE REQUEST APPLICANT CONTACT INFORMATION Name of Applicant(s): _______________________________________________________________ Address: _________________________________ City: ___________ State: ________ ZIP: _______ Telephone: ____________________ Cell: _____________________ Fax: ______________________ E-Mail Address: ____________________________________________________________________ Address of Subject Property (If available): ______________________________________________ City: _________________ State: ________ ZIP: _________ PROPERTY INFORMATION Section/Township/Range: / / Lot: Block: Subdivision: ___________________________________________________ Metes & Bounds Description: _________________________________________________________ Plat Book: Page #: Property I.D. Number: ____________________________________ TYPE OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL TO BE PROVIDED Check applicable system: a.County Utility System b.City Utility System c.Franchised Utility System Provide Name: __________________________ d.Package Treatment Plant (GPD Capacity): _________________________ e.Septic System TYPE OF WATER SERVICE TO BE PROVIDED Check applicable system: a.County Utility System b.City Utility System c.Franchised Utility System Provide Name: __________________________ d.Private System (Well) Total Population to be Served: ________________________________________________________ Peak and Average Daily Demands: A. Water-Peak: _________ Average Daily: __________ B. Sewer-Peak: _________ Average Daily: __________ If proposing to be connected to Collier County Regional Water System, please provide the date service is expected to be required: ____________________________________________________ 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 487 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliercounty.gov (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 March 4, 2020 Page 7 of 11 Narrative statement: Provide a brief and concise narrative statement and schematic drawing of sewage treatment process to be used as well as a specific statement regarding the method of affluent and sludge disposal. If percolation ponds are to be used, then percolation data and soil involved shall be provided from tests prepared and certified by a professional engineer. __________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________ Collier County Utility Dedication Statement: If the project is located within the service boundaries of Collier County’s utility service system, a notarized statement shall be provided agreeing to dedicate the water distribution and sewage collection facilities within the project area to the Collier County Utilities. This shall occur upon completion of the construction of these facilities in accordance with all applicable County ordinances in effect at that time. This statement shall also include an agreement that the applicable system development charges and connection fees will be paid to the County Utilities Division prior to the issuance of building permits by the County. If applicable, the statement shall contain an agreement to dedicate the appropriate utility easements for serving the water and sewer systems. __________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________ Statement of Availability Capacity from other Providers: Unless waived or otherwise provided for at the pre-application meeting, if the project is to receive sewer or potable water services from any provider other than the County, a statement from that provider indicating adequate capacity to serve the project shall be provided. 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 488 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) Legal Description A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTH QUARTER (1/4) CORNER OF SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE S89°30'40"E FOR 1386.36 FEET ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (1/4) OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) OF SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) OF SAID SECTION 12; THENCE N00°05'00"W FOR 85.00 FEET ALONG THE WEST LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) OF SECTION 12, TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE ORDER OF TAKING DESCRIBED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 2660, PAGE 3356 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, ALSO BEING THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE PARCEL DESCRIBED HEREIN; THENCE CONTINUE ALONG THE WEST LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) OF SECTION 12, N00°05'00"W FOR 1235.06 FEET, TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) OF SAID SECTION 12; THENCE N00°05'25”W FOR 1015.36 FEET ALONG THE WEST LINE OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) OF SECTION 12; THENCE N00°10'26"W FOR 304.90 FEET, TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) OF SAID SECTION 12; THENCE N00°29'43"W FOR 1219.68 FEET ALONG THE WEST LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) OF SAID SECTION 12, TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY OF A 100 FOOT WIDE PUBLIC SCHOOL ACCESS DRIVE, ALSO KNOWN AS OSCEOLA TRAIL; THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY OF OSCEOLA TRAIL, THE FOLLOWING TWO (2) DESCRIBED COURSES: 1) THENCE S89°33'47"E FOR 200.20 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENTIAL CURVE; 2) THENCE 172.82 FEET ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 285.00 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 34°44'37", AND WHOSE LONG CHORD BEARS S72°11'28"E FOR A DISTANCE OF 170.19 FEET, TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON-TANGENTIAL CURVE; THENCE LEAVING SAID SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY OF OSCEOLA TRAIL FOR THE FOLLOWING NINE (9) DESCRIBED COURSES: 1) THENCE 7.88 FEET ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 45.00 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 10°01'58", AND WHOSE LONG CHORD BEARS S80°03'03"W FOR A DISTANCE OF 7.87 FEET; 2) THENCE S36°05'39"W FOR 106.66 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON -TANGENTIAL CURVE; 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 489 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) 3) THENCE 34.38 FEET ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 45.00 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 43°46'28", AND WHOSE LONG CHORD BEARS S24°44'15"E FOR A DISTANCE OF 33.55 FEET, TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON-TANGENTIAL CURVE; 4) THENCE 36.47 FEET ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 155.04 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 13°28'44", AND WHOSE LONG CHORD BEARS S39°53'07"E FOR A DISTANCE OF 36.39 FEET, TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON-TANGENTIAL CURVE; 5) THENCE 71.28 FEET ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 120.00 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 34°02'08", AND WHOSE LONG CHORD BEARS S50°36'17"E FOR A DISTANCE OF 70.24 FEET; 6) THENCE S67°37'21"E FOR 62.82 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENTIAL CURVE; 7) THENCE 59.78 FEET ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 120.00 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 28°32'32", AND WHOSE LONG CHORD BEARS S81°53'37"E FOR A DISTANCE OF 59.16 FEET; 8) THENCE N83°50'03"E FOR 23.32 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENTIAL CURVE; 9) THENCE 54.37 FEET ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 35.00 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 89°00'31", AND WHOSE LONG CHORD BEARS N39°19'12"E FOR A DISTANCE OF 49.07 FEET, TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON-TANGENTIAL CURVE, ALSO BEING A POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID OSCEOLA TRAIL; THENCE THE FOLLOWING TWO (2) DESCRIBED COURSES ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID OSCEOLA TRAIL: 1) THENCE 244.65 FEET ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 385.00 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 36°24'34", AND WHOSE LONG CHORD BEARS S71°21'30"E FOR A DISTANCE OF 240.56 FEET; 2) THENCE S89°33'47"E FOR 306.64 FEET, TO A POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH THE WESTERLY RIGHT- OF-WAY LINE OF LIVINGSTON ROAD (COUNTY ROAD 881); AS SHOWN ON THE ROADWAY PLANS, COUNTY PROJECT NO. 62071; THENCE ALONG SAID WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF LIVINGSTON ROAD, THE FOLLOWING FOUR (4) DESCRIBED COURSES: 1) THENCE S00°50'38"E FOR 134.04 FEET; 2) THENCE N89°10'59"E FOR 10.00 FEET; 3) THENCE S00°50'38"E FOR 783.66 FEET, TO A BREAK POINT IN SAID WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF LIVINGSTON ROAD, AS OFFSET FROM THE EASTERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID SECTION 12; 4) THENCE S00°17'36"E FOR 1316.08 FEET, TO A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) OF SAID SECTION 12; THENCE N89°30'32"W FOR 235.06 FEET ALONG SAID NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) OF SAID SECTION 12, TO A POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH THE 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 490 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) WESTERLY BOUNDARY OF THE EAST 510 FEET OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) OF SAID SECTION 12; THENCE S00°17'18"E FOR 521.25 FEET ALONG SAID WESTERLY BOUNDARY OF THE EAST 510 FEET OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) OF SECTION 12; THENCE LEAVING SAID WESTERLY BOUNDARY OF THE EAST 510 FEET OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) OF SECTION 12, N89°31'12"W FOR 181.55 FEET; THENCE S00°10'47"E FOR 139.04 FEET, TO A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH HALF (1/2) OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) OF SAID SECTION 12; THENCE N89°31'23"W FOR 591.69 FEET ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH HALF (1/2) OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) OF SAID SECTION 12; THENCE LEAVING SAID NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH HALF (1/2) OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) OF SAID SECTION 12, S00°05'41"E FOR 575.60 FEET, TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE ORDER OF TAKING DESCRIBED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 2660, PAGE 3356 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE N89°21'57"W FOR 99.95 FEET, ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID ORDER OF TAKING, TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE PARCEL HEREIN DESCRIBED; CONTAINING 3,181,995 SQUARE FEET OR 73.0 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS AND RESTRICTIONS OF RECORD. TOGETHER WITH A TRACT OF LAND AS DESCRIBED IN OR. BOOK 4835, PAGE 1992, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORID A PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCE AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE RUN N00°17'55"W ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 12, FOR A DISTANCE OF 1320.72 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 12, THENCE RUN N89°33'10"W ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 12, FOR A DISTANCE OF 1381.30 FEET, TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 12 AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE PARCEL OF LAND HEREIN DESCRIBED: THENCE N.89°33'10"W., ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTH EAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 12, FOR A DISTANCE OF 392.33 FEET; THENCE RUN N.00°26'55"E., FOR A DISTANCE OF 12.01 FEET; THENCE RUN N.17°16'31"W., FOR A DISTANCE OF 26.91 FEET; 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 491 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) THENCE RUN N.36°52'48"E., FOR A DISTANCE OF 28.14 FEET; THENCE RUN N.02°14'11"E., FOR A DISTANCE OF 37.24 FEET; THENCE RUN N.20°59'45"E., FOR A DISTANCE OF 55.86 FEET; THENCE RUN N.55°57'35"E., FOR A DISTANCE OF 32.58 FEET; THENCE RUN N.25°35'56"E., FOR A DISTANCE OF 38.53 FEET; THENCE RUN N.14°12'06"E., FOR A DISTANCE OF 30.40 FEET; THENCE RUN N.38°03'22"E., FOR A DISTANCE OF 56.97 FEET; THENCE RUN N.33°34'22"E., FOR A DISTANCE OF 39.53 FEET; THENCE RUN N.40°13'55"E., FOR A DISTANCE OF 35.17 FEET; THENCE RUN N.35°12'04"W., FOR A DISTANCE OF 28.99 FEET; THENCE RUN N.00°25'59"E., FOR A DISTANCE OF 25.97 FEET; THENCE RUN N.67°39'55"E., FOR A DISTANCE OF 17.60 FEET; THENCE RUN N.47°42'44"E., FOR A DISTANCE OF 47.16 FEET; THENCE RUN N.16°23'23"E., FOR A DISTANCE OF 26.84 FEET; THENCE RUN N.56°27'41"E., FOR A DISTANCE OF 41.75 FEET; THENCE RUN N.48°06'59"E., FOR A DISTANCE OF 18.71 FEET; THENCE RUN S.79°43'39"E., FOR A DISTANCE OF 10.31 FEET; THENCE RUN N.77°03'32"E., FOR A DISTANCE OF 26.10 FEET; THENCE RUN N.79°57'37"E., FOR A DISTANCE OF 52.16 FEET; THENCE RUN N.00°04'22"W., FOR 505.22 FEET TO A POINT ON A CIRCULAR CURVE; CONCAVE SOUTHERLY, WHOSE RADIUS POINT BEARS S.17°20'34"E., A DISTANCE OF 169.00 FEET THEREON, THENCE RUN EASTERLY, ALONG SAID ARC OF SAID CURVE TO THE RIGHT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 169.00 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 17°55'05" AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD OF 52.64 FEET AT A BEARING OF N.81°38'58"E., FOR A DISTANCE OF 52.85 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EAST LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 12; THENCE RUN S.00°05'53"E., ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 12, FOR A DISTANCE OF 1015.12 FEET, TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; CONTAINING 172,105.56 SQUARE FEET OR 3.951 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. THIS PROPERTY IS SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS, RESERVATIONS OR RESTRICTIONS OF RECORDS. BEARINGS REFER TO THE EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 49, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AS BEING N00°17'55"W. 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 492 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) ENVIRONMENTAL SUPPLEMENT COMMUNITY SCHOOL OF NAPLES PUDA MAY 9, 2020 Prepared by: TURRELL, HALL & ASSOCIATES, INC 3584 EXCHANGE AVENUE NAPLES, FL 34104 (239) 643-0166 TUNA@THANAPLES.COM 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 493 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) Community School of Naples PUDA Spoon Parcel Addition Collier County Environmental Supplement May 2021 1 Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION 2 2.0 WETLAND JURISDICTION AND PERMITTING HISTORY OVERVIEW 4 3.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS (PRE-DEVELOPMENT) 5 3.1 VEGETATION ASSOCIATIONS 5 3.2 TOPOGRAPHY AND DRAINAGE PATTERNS 7 3.3 WETLANDS AND OTHER SURFACE WATERS 7 3.3.1 Wetland Season High Water Table and Hydroperiod 7 3.3.2 Jurisdictional Status of Wetlands 7 3.4 NATIVE HABITAT 8 3.5 LISTED PLANT AND ANIMAL SPECIES 8 3.6 HISTORICAL/ ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 9 3.7 SOILS 9 4.0 PROPOSED CONDITIONS (POST-DEVELOPMENT) 15 4.1 PROPOSED PROJECT 15 4.2 PROJECT IMPACTS TO WETLANDS 15 4.2.1 Direct, Permanent Impacts 15 4.2.2 Temporary Impacts 15 4.2.3 Secondary Impacts to Wetlands and Water Resources 15 4.2.4 Cumulative Impacts to Wetlands 15 4.3 PRESERVATION OF WETLANDS, OTHER SURFACE WATERS, AND UPLANDS 15 4.4 PROJECT IMPACTS TO WETLANDS 16 4.5 PROJECT IMPACTS TO ARCAEOLOGICAL/ HISTORICAL RESOURCES 17 4..6 PRESERVE MANAGEMENT PLAN 18 5.0 PROJECT CONSISTENCY WITH CCME 19 EXHIBITS 1 Location Map 2 Existing Site Aerial 3 FLUCFCS Map 4 Site Plan 5 Impacts Map 6 Preserves Map 7 Soils Map APPENDICES I.Listed Species Survey II.Division of Historical Resources Master Site File Information III.Listed Species Management Plans 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 494 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) Community School of Naples PUDA Spoon Parcel Addition Collier County Environmental Supplement May 2021 2 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Community School of Naples property is approximately 73± acres in size, located at 13275 Livingston Road approximately 0.13 miles north of Pine Ridge Road. The property is situated within Section 12, Township 49 South, Range 25 East, Collier, County, Florida. The Collier County Property Appraiser identifies the school parcel with ID# 00256320000. Access to school grounds occurs via a security gate just south of Osceola Trail or an entrance north of Pine Ridge Road situated between Cypress Glen Condominiums and the Sports Camp. The additional Spoon Parcel, which is proposed for partial construction onsite, lies on the southwestern-most side of the site and is best accessed via a gated pathway off Osceola Trail along the west side of the main campus and athletic fields. A general Location Map can be found as Exhibit 1 at the end of this document. The applicant is proposing to amend the existing CFPUD for The Community School of Naples in order to add and develop 0.66 acres of what was designated as a 3.95-acre “future phase” in the CFPUD, making the total site size 77± acres. In addition to the new acreage, some features on the west campus will be added/changed. Proposed campus changes include a basketball court, a turf field, new lower school dining facility, new dumpster facility, and a relocated play area. This 3.95-acre Spoon Parcel, which is currently wooded, would be impacted to slightly expand parking for the school at this time. THE COMMUNITY SCHOOL OF NAPLES PUD In the CFPUD, Collier County LDC 3.05.07 B.1. (commercial and industrial development and all other non-specified development types, over 5 acres, within Non- Coastal High Hazard Areas) required that at least 15% (0.25 acres) of the pre-existing native vegetation (1.66 acres) was to be preserved. Ultimately 100% of the native vegetation was retained and preserved onsite leaving an excess of 1.41 preserve acres. SPOON PARCEL Of the 3.95-acre additional Spoon Parcel, 3.26 acres (83%) would not be considered jurisdictional wetland to state and/or federal agencies. Exotic plant species have a moderate cover on the east and southeast sides, while the west side of the site currently has a very low degree of infestation overall. Approximately 3.92 acres of the 3.95 acres, or 99% of the site, meets the County’s definition of native habitat. (See Exhibit 6) 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 495 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) Community School of Naples PUDA Spoon Parcel Addition Collier County Environmental Supplement May 2021 3 Collier County’s Growth Management Plan requires the Community School of Naples to retain at least 15% (0.59 acres) of the new native vegetative cover onsite, which the existing preserve already accommodates with an excess of 1.41 acres. Surrounding land uses include a preserve to the west, Osceola Elementary School to the northwest, Cypress Glen Condominiums to the southwest, Sports Club to the south, and Livingston Road and Osceola Trail to the east and north, respectively. This document provides information concerning the proposed addition of the Spoon parcel to the Community School of Naples CFPUD as it relates to natural resources and environmental issues. It was compiled by Marielle Nageon de Lestang, Senior Biologist of Turrell, Hall and Associates. It was written to support an application submitted to Collier County for an amendment to the existing CFPUD zoning designation. Credentials: Marielle Nageon de Lestang Biologist with Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc. since 1997 B.S. Degree- Environmental Science from Alabama A & M University (1997) 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 496 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) Community School of Naples PUDA Spoon Parcel Addition Collier County Environmental Supplement May 2021 4 2.0 WETLAND JURISDICTION AND PERMITTING HISTORY OVERVIEW In the early 1980s the Community School campus was constructed over agricultural lands adjacent to a powerline easement in order to serve a small number of elementary school students. Since that time, the campus has expanded to accommodate additional grades through high school. South Florida Water Management District Permit 11-01804-P pertains to the existing Community School campus but does not include the 3.95-acre Spoon Parcel. No jurisdictional wetland verification has been performed on the proposed development portions of the Spoon Parcel to-date. The plan will impact approximately 0.66 acres of non-jurisdictional, native upland habitat with buffers greater than or equal to the required 25 feet from any jurisdictional wetland. 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 497 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) Community School of Naples PUDA Spoon Parcel Addition Collier County Environmental Supplement May 2021 5 3.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS (PRE-DEVELOPMENT) 3 .1 VEGETATION ASSOCIATIONS Vegetative communities of the newly added Spoon Parcel include upland palmetto/pine habitat and disturbed (filled) lands, as well as some laurel oak wetland and pine, cypress, cabbage palm wetland. The existing habitat types (based on FLUCFCS codes) are shown in Table 1 below and Exhibit 3 (FLUCFCS Map). Of the total 3.95 acres contained within the combined Spoon Parcel property boundary, approximately 83% are considered uplands (3.26 ac.) and 17% are considered wetlands (0.69 ac.). Exotic vegetation is most dominant on the eastern and southern sides of the parcel. There are no rare or exceptional vegetation associations present on the project lands. Table 1: EXISTING HABITAT TYPES - FLUCFCS Codes & Acreages Habitat Descriptions FLUCFCS Code Project Acreage Spoon Parcel Wetland Habitat Pine, Cypress, Cabbage Palm/Wetland Hardwood (15% Exotic) 624/610 E1 0.29 Mixed Wetland Hardwood 617 0.40 Total Wetland Habitat 0.69 Spoon Parcel Upland Habitat Palmetto Prairie/Pine Flatwood (25-60% Exotic) 321/411 E2 3.23 Disturbed Land 740 0.03 Total Upland Habitat 3.26 Institutional (School) 170 71.34 Existing Wetland Preserve 617 1.66 Vegetative areas denoted by habitat-type in Tables 2 through 4 contain the following species and information on their dominance in the community. Table 2: Commonly observed species found within the 624/610 E1 Community. Common Name Scientific Name Stratum Dominant slash pine Pinus elliottii C, M Yes pond cypress Taxodium ascendens C, M Yes laurel oak Quercus laurifolia C, M, G Yes cabbage palm Sabal palmetto C, M No myrsine Myrsine cubana M, G Yes cocoplum Chrysobalanus icaco M, G Yes 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 498 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) Community School of Naples PUDA Spoon Parcel Addition Collier County Environmental Supplement May 2021 6 Brazilian pepper* Schinus terebinthifolia M, G No American burn weed Erechtites hieraciifolius G Yes loosestrife Lythrum alatum G Yes swamp fern Telmatoblechnum serrulatum G Yes false nettle Boehmeria cylindrica G Yes saw grass Cladium jamaicense G No small-leaf climbing fern* Lygodium microphyllum V No greenbriar Smilax spp. V No muscadine Vitis rotundifolia V No C=canopy stratum, M=midstory stratum, G=ground stratum, V=woody vine stratum, *=Exotic Table 3: Commonly observed species found within the 617E Community. Common Name Scientific Name Stratum Dominant buttonwood Conocarpus erectus C, M, G Yes coastal willow Salix caroliniana C, M, G Yes pop ash Fraxinus caroliniana C, M, G Yes red maple Acer rubrum C, M No cabbage palm Sabal palmetto C, M No bald cypress Taxodium distichum M No buttonbush Cephalanthus occidentalis M No groundsel tree Baccharis halimifolia M, G No American burn weed Erechtites hieraciifolius G Yes loosestrife Lythrum alatum G Yes false nettle Boehmeria cylindrica G Yes pond apple Annona glabra G No lateflowering thoroughwort Eupatorium serotinum G No C=canopy stratum, M=midstory stratum, G=ground stratum, V=woody vine stratum, *=Exotic Table 4: Commonly observed species found within the 321/ 411 E2 Community. Common Name Scientific Name Stratum Dominant slash pine Pinus elliottii C, M, G Yes earleaf acacia* Acacia auriculiformis C, M Yes laurel oak Quercus laurifolia C, M No swamp bay Persea palustris M No Brazilian pepper* Schinus terebinthifolia M No dahoon holly Ilex cassine M No rusty lyonia Lyonia fruticosa M No saw palmetto Serenoa repens M, G Yes downy rose myrtle* Rhodomyrtus tomentosa M, G Yes cocoplum Chrysobalanus icaco M, G Yes myrsine Myrsine cubana M, G No muscadine Vitis rotundifolia V No greenbriar Smilax spp V No C=canopy stratum, M=midstory stratum, G=ground stratum, V=woody vine stratum, *=Exotic 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 499 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) Community School of Naples PUDA Spoon Parcel Addition Collier County Environmental Supplement May 2021 7 3 .2 TOPOGRAPHY AND DRAINAGE PATTERNS According to the SFWMD, the project lands are located within the West Collier drainage basin and Airport Road Canal South sub basin. The receiving body is offsite wetlands and the Barron Collier Surface Water Management System. At least 73 of the 77 acres has already been graded and developed to drain appropriately into the permitted water management system. The Spoon Parcel currently drains to the west, southwest below the disturbed pathway in the ‘handle’ and above the ‘handle’ to the north towards a stormwater lake. 3 .3 WETLANDS AND OTHER SURFACE WATERS Qualified Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc. (THA) environmental staff inspected the project site for the purpose of delineating wetlands and other surface waters. The wetland delineation methodologies and criteria set forth by the state (in Chapter 62-340, FAC, Delineation of the Landward Extent of Wetlands and Surface Waters) and the 62- 330, FAC 404 Assumption were followed in determining whether an area was considered as a wetland or other surface water and in delineating the limits (boundaries) of potential jurisdictional wetlands and other surface waters. THA biologists flagged the boundaries of those areas which are considered wetlands according to the state and federal guidelines. Exhibit 3 depicts wetlands present on the project lands. Within the spoon Parcel property there are two wetland areas bisected by a filled pathway between the Community School and Osceola Elementary School. 3.3.1 Wetland Seasonal High-Water Table & Hydroperiod The hydrologic regime on this property is altered. High-water marks varied from 8 to 13 inches in the transitional wetland, yet the soils were so dry and sandy that a proper soil plug could not be obtained. This is indicative of a flashy hydroperiod. Other hydrological indicators included lichen lines and sediment deposits, but these indicators presented to a lesser degree than water lines. With no well data, the water lines were used to determine the seasonal high-water level. Nails were placed in trees around the main upland and have been surveyed for control elevations. 3.3.2 Jurisdictional Status of Wetlands No wetland determinations have been made to-date on this Spoon Parcel from regulatory agencies. 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 500 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) Community School of Naples PUDA Spoon Parcel Addition Collier County Environmental Supplement May 2021 8 3.4 NATIVE HABITAT Collier County Land Development Code regulations require that projects preserve a portion of their on-site native habitat as part of their development proposal. Calculations are based on a percentage of the acreage of native habitat existing on the site. Since Community School property is greater than 5 acres in size and qualifies as “Commercial and industrial development and all other development types” under LDC 3.05.07 B.1., it is required to preserve 15% of existing native vegetation on the site. Of the 3.95 acres 3.92 acres (99%) qualify as native habitat. The addition of the Spoon Parcel’s 15% will add 0.59 acres to the previously required 0.25 acres of native habitat, to create the need for 0.84 preservation acres. Though 0.25 acres were required for preservation under the previous PUD approvals, the permittee preserved 1.66 acres, creating a 1.41- acre surplus. Since there is a 1.41 acre preserve surplus, the additional native preserve needed with the proposed project will draw that surplus down to 0.57 acres (1.41 surplus – 0.84 required). Table 5- Native Vegetation Acreages Habitat FLUCFCS Code Total Acreage Native Vegetation Acreage Pine, Cypress, Cabbage palm/Wetland Hardwood (15% Exotic) 624/610 E1 0.29 0.29 Mixed Wetland Hardwood 617 0.40 0.40 Palmetto prairie/Pine flatwood (25-60% Exotic) 321/411 E2 3.23 3.23 Disturbed Land 740 0.03 0.00 New Native Vegetation Acreage 3.92 New Total Native Vegetation Acreage Required 0.59 Prior PUD Native Vegetation Acreage Required 0.25 Total PUD Native Vegetation Requirement 0.84 Existing Onsite Preservation to Remain 1.66 Surplus Preservation Balance 0.57 3.5 LISTED PLANT AND ANIMAL SPECIES A survey for listed animal and plant species has been conducted within the project area by THA biologists. This threatened and endangered species survey and its results are discussed in the attached Appendix I. During the survey events, no listed species were observed within the project area nor was any evidence of utilization noted. One potential cavity tree was noted just offsite to the west that will not be a factor to this project (see Exhibit 7). 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 501 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) Community School of Naples PUDA Spoon Parcel Addition Collier County Environmental Supplement May 2021 9 A few listed animal species not observed on the project lands have some potential for occurring in certain habitats present onsite. These species are discussed in Appendix I and include little blue heron, indigo snake, roseate spoonbill, tricolor heron, woodstork, Big Cypress fox squirrel, gopher tortoise, and Florida bonneted bat. The probability of these animals utilizing suitable habitats in project lands ranges from very low to low depending upon the particular species (see discussion in Appendix I). It is highly unlikely that any federally listed plant species could be present on the project lands, however the state-endangered cardinal airplant (Tillandsia fasciculata) is present within the wetland habitat. Due to the site’s isolated nature between schools and roadways and its flashy hydrologic regime, it does not afford the quantity and quality of habitat required for most listed species. 3 .6 HISTORICAL/ ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES The Florida Master Site File (MSF) is a database of the known historic and archaeological sites in the state of Florida. The MSF office was contacted in May (2021) and returned evidence that no known historical resources were documented in the section, township, range of this project (See Appendix II). No evidence of historical resources was found onsite during site inspections. If a suspected archaeological or historical artifact is discovered during the course of site development activities (construction, clearing, etc.), the development activities at the specific site will be immediately halted and the appropriate agency notified. Development will be suspended for a sufficient length of time to enable the County or a designated consultant to assess the find and determine the proper course of action. 3 .7 SOILS Based on the National Resource Conservation Service (NRCS) "Soil Survey of Collier County Area, Florida" (NRCS, 1998) there are 3 different soil types (soil map units) present on the project lands. Exhibit 8 provides a soils map for the project area as derived from the NRCS mapping. The following sub-sections provide a brief description of each soil map unit identified on the project lands. Information is provided about the soil's landscape position (i.e., its typical location in the landscape on a county-wide basis), the soil's profile (i.e., textural composition and thickness or depth range of the layers or horizons commonly present in the soil), and the soil's drainage and hydrologic characteristics. The soils occurring on project lands are as follows: 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 502 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) Community School of Naples PUDA Spoon Parcel Addition Collier County Environmental Supplement May 2021 10 (3) Malabar Fine Sand (Hydric) This nearly level, poorly drained soil is in sloughs and poorly defined drainage ways. Individual areas are elongated and irregular in shape and range from 10 to 250 acres. The slope is 0 to 2 percent. Typically, the surface layer is dark gray fine sand about 2 inches thick. The subsurface layer is light brownish gray fine sand to a depth of about 15 inches. The subsoil extends to a depth of about 72 inches; the upper part is brownish yellow and yellow fine sand, the middle part is very pale brown and light gray fine sand, the lower part is grayish brown, mottled, sand clay loam. The substratum is light gray fine sand with 10 percent shell fragments to a depth of about 80 inches. In 95 percent of areas mapped as Malabar fine sand, Malabar soil and soils of similar characteristics make up 75 to 99 percent of the map unit. The characteristics of Pineda and Riviera soils are similar. Soils of dissimilar characteristics included in this map unit are small areas of Basinger, Boca and Oldsmar soils on similar landscape positions. These soils make up about 1 to 25 percent of the unit. The permeability of this soil is slow to very slow. The available water capacity is low. In most years, under natural conditions, the seasonal high-water table is within 12 inches of the surface for 3 to 6 months. In other months, the water table is below 12 inches and recedes to a depth of more than 40 inches during extended dry periods. During periods of high rainfall, the soil is covered by shallow moving water for periods of about 7 to 30 days. Natural vegetation consists of scattered south Florida slashpine, cypress, cabbage palm, saw palmetto, wax myrtle, pineland threeawn and chalky bluestem. This soil is poorly suited to cultivated crops because of wetness and droughtiness. With good water-control measures and soil-improving measures, the soil can be made suitable for many fruit and vegetable crops. A water control system is needed to remove excess water in wet seasons and provide water through subsurface irrigation in dry seasons. Row crops should be rotated with cover crops. Seedbed preparation should include bedding of the rows. Fertilizer and lime should be added according to the need of the crops. With proper water control, the soil is moderately suited to citrus. Water control systems that maintain good drainage to an effective depth are needed. Bedding the soil prior to 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 503 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) Community School of Naples PUDA Spoon Parcel Addition Collier County Environmental Supplement May 2021 11 planting provides good surface and internal drainage and elevates the trees above the seasonal high-water table. A good grass cover crop between the trees helps to protect the soil from blowing when the trees are younger. With good water control management, this soil is well suited to pasture. A water control system is needed to remove excess water during the wet season. It is well suited to pangolagrass, bahiagrass and clover. Excellent pastures of grass or grass-clover mixtures can be grown with good management. Regular application of fertilizers and controlled grazing are needed for highest yields. This soil is well suited for desirable range plant production. The dominant forage consists of blue maidencane, chalky bluestem and bluejoint panicum. Management practices should include deferred grazing. This Malabar soil is in the Slough range site. This soil has severe limitations for most urban uses because of the high-water table. To overcome this limitation, building sites and septic tank absorption fields should be mounded. This soil also has severe limitation for recreational development because of wetness and sand texture. Problems associated with wetness can be corrected by providing adequate drainage and drainage outlets to control the high-water table. The sandy texture limitation can be overcome by adding suitable topsoil or by resurfacing the area. (27) Holopaw Fine Sand (Hydric) This nearly level, poorly drained soil is in sloughs and poorly define drainageways. Individual areas are elongated and irregular in shape and range from 10 to 400 acres. The slope is 0 to 2 percent. Typically, the surface layer is dark gray fine sand about 5 inches thick. The subsurface layer is fine sand to a depth of about 52 inches; the upper part is light gray, and the lower part is light brownish gray. The subsoil extends to a depth of about 62 inches; the upper part is dark grayish brown fine sand, and the lower part is dark grayish brown fine sandy loam. The substratum is gray loamy fine sand to a depth of about 80 inches. In 90 percent of areas mapped as this soil, Holopaw and similar soils make up 87 to 100 percent of the map unit. The characteristics of Malabar, Pineda and Riviera soils are similar. Soils of dissimilar characteristics included in this map unit are small areas of Basinger and Oldsmar soils on similar landscape positions. These soils make up about 13 percent or less of the unit. 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 504 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) Community School of Naples PUDA Spoon Parcel Addition Collier County Environmental Supplement May 2021 12 The permeability of this soil is moderate to moderately slow. The available water capacity is low. In most years, under natural conditions, the seasonal high-water table is within 12 inches of the surface for 3 to 6 months. In other months, the water table is below 12 inches and recedes to a depth of more than 40 inches during extended dry periods. During periods of high rainfall, the soil is covered by shallow slowly moving water for periods of about 7 to 30 days. Natural vegetation consists of scattered slash pine, cypress, cabbage palm, saw palmetto, wax myrtle, sand cordgrass, gulf muhly, panicum’s, chalky bluestem, plume grass, Gulfdune paspalum and blue maidencane. This soil is poorly suited to cultivated crops because of wetness and droughtiness. With good water-control measures and soil-improving measures, the soil can be made suitable for many fruit and vegetable crops. A water control system is needed to remove excess water in wet seasons and provide water through subsurface irrigation in dry seasons. Row crops should be rotated with cover crops. Seedbed preparation should include bedding of the rows. Fertilizer and lime should be added according to the need of the crops. With proper water control, the soil is moderately suited to citrus. Water control systems that maintain good drainage to an effective depth are needed. Bedding the soil prior to planting provides good surface an internal drainage and elevates the trees above the seasonal high-water table. A good grass cover crop between the trees helps to protect the soil from blowing when the trees are younger. With good water control management, this soil is well suited to pasture. A water control system is needed to remove excess water during the wet season. It is well suited to pangolagrass, bahiagrass and clover. Excellent pastures of grass and grass-clover mixtures can be grown with good management. Regular applications of fertilizer and controlled grazing are needed for highest yields. This soil is well suited for desirable range plant production. The dominant forage consists of blue maidencane, Gulfdune paspalum, chalky bluestem and blue joint panicum. Management practices should include deferred grazing. This Holopaw soil is in the Slough range site. This soil is well suited for desirable range plant production. The dominant forage consists of blue maidencane, Gulfdune paspalum, chalky bluestem and blue joint panicum. Management practices should include deferred grazing. This Holopaw soil is in the Slough range site. 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 505 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) Community School of Naples PUDA Spoon Parcel Addition Collier County Environmental Supplement May 2021 13 This soil has severe limitations for most urban uses because of the high-water table to overcome this limitation, building sites and septic tank absorption fields should be mounded. This soil also has severe limitation for recreational development because of wetness and sandy texture. Problems associated with wetness can be corrected by providing adequate drainage and drainage outlets to control the high-water table. The sandy texture limitations can be overcome by adding suitable topsoil or by resurfacing the area. (33) Urban Land, Holopaw, Bassinger Complex (Non-Hydric) These near level, poorly drained soils are on urban areas of the county. Individual areas are blocky to irregular in shape and range from 20 to 500 acres. Typically, Urban land consists of commercial buildings, houses, parking lots, streets, sidewalks, recreational areas, shopping centers and other urban structures where the soil cannot be observed. Typically, the Holopaw soil has a surface layer of dark gray fine sand about 5 inches thick. The subsurface layer is fine sand to a depth of about 52 inches; the upper part is light gray, and the lower part is light brownish gray. The subsoil extends to a depth of about 62 inches; the upper part is dark grayish brown fine sand, and the lower part is dark grayish brown fine sandy loam. The substratum is gray loamy fine sand to a depth of about 80 inches. Typically, the Basinger soil has a surface layer of grayish brown fine sand about 3 inches thick. The subsurface layer is light gray fine sand to a depth of about 25 inches. The subsoil is brown fine sand to a depth of about 44 inches. The substratum is brown fine sand to a depth of about 80 inches. In 90 percent of the area mapped as this unit urban land makes up about 45 percent, Holopaw makes up about 35 percent and Basinger soil makes up about 20 percent of the map unit. The soils occur as areas so intricately mixed or so small that mapping them separately is not practical. The Holopaw and Basinger soils may or may not have been filled or reworked to accommodate urban land uses. The characteristics of Malabar soil are similar. The permeability of the Basinger soil is rapid and the available water capacity is low. The permeability of the Holopaw soil is moderate to moderately slow and the available water capacity is moderate. In most years, under natural conditions, the seasonal high- water table is within 12 inches of the surface for 3 to 6 months. In other months, the water table is below 12 inches and recedes to a depth of more than 40 inches during extended dry periods. During periods of high rainfall, the soil is covered by shallow 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 506 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) Community School of Naples PUDA Spoon Parcel Addition Collier County Environmental Supplement May 2021 14 slowly moving water for periods of about 7 to 30 a day. Most areas have had drainage systems installed to help control the seasonal high-water table and runoff. Present land use precludes use of this map unit for cultivated crops, citrus, or tame pasture. Because of the complexity, of this unity, it is suggested that on site investigations be made for urban and recreational development and septic tank absorption field sites. 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 507 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) Community School of Naples PUDA Spoon Parcel Addition Collier County Environmental Supplement May 2021 15 4.0 PROPOSED CONDITIONS (POST-DEVELOPMENT) 4 .1 PROPOSED PROJECT The purpose of the proposed Spoon Parcel phase addition is to provide a small amount of parking for west campus changes proposed in the PUDA at this time, leaving the remaining 2.57 upland acres for future use. The location of the project is immediately adjacent to the remaining school west campus grounds and is within a half-mile radius of several other school facilities. 4 .2 PROJECT IMPACTS TO WETLANDS 4.2.1 Direct, Permanent Impacts Development of the proposed project will not impact any jurisdictional wetlands primarily or secondarily. Impacts have been planned to avoid all wetland areas. 4.2.2 Temporary Impacts No temporary wetland impacts are proposed with this project. 4.2.3 Secondary Impacts to Wetlands and Water Resources No secondary impacts are associated with the proposed project. 4.2.4 Cumulative Impacts to Wetlands No cumulative impacts are expected as a result of this project. The development of this property will not increase the development likelihood of adjacent parcels since they are currently under conservation easement already. 4 .3 PRESERVATION OF WETLANDS, OTHER SURFACE WATERS, AND UPLANDS Partial development of the proposed Spoon Parcel property will not impact any jurisdictional wetlands. The proposed project will impact upland palmetto/pine habitat, which is moderately degraded with exotic plant species. Native wetland areas totaling 1.66 acres were already preserved elsewhere in the PUD, even though only 0.25 acres of native preservation was required to meet the land development code. Future development scenarios on the Spoon Parcel will also avoid wetland impacts. 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 508 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) Community School of Naples PUDA Spoon Parcel Addition Collier County Environmental Supplement May 2021 16 4 .4 PROJECT IMPACTS TO LISTED SPECIES A survey for listed animal and plant species was conducted on the project site by THA biologists in 2021. No listed animals were observed directly or indirectly by biologists during this survey. There are a few listed animal species (Appendix I) which could have the potential to occur in certain habitats present on-site. These species include but are not limited to the Eastern indigo snake (Drymarchon couperi), tricolor heron (Egretta tricolor), roseate spoonbill (Platalea ajaja), little blue heron (Egretta caerulea), woodstork (Mycteria americana), gopher tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus), Big Cypress fox squirrel (Sciurus niger), and Florida bonneted bat (Eumops floridanus). The probability of these animals utilizing suitable on-site habitats ranges from low to very low depending on the particular species. None of these species currently reside or nest on-site. The following subsections provide an assessment of the proposed project’s potential impacts to various listed animal species. The species addressed include certain species that could potentially occur on the Spoon Parcel site or on nearby off-site parcels. Wood Storks (Mycteria americana) No wood stork nests, rookeries, or roosting sites have been found on the subject property, or adjacent, and no known colonies are in the area. The proposed project will not impact any wetlands on-site. Various Listed Wading Birds Little blue herons (Egretta caerulea), roseate spoonbill (Platalea ajaja), and tricolor heron (Egretta tricolor) could potentially use the wetlands on-site but have not been documented within the vicinity of the site. No nests of these species have been observed within the project area. Development of the project area will not result in the loss of on-site wetlands that could be utilized by the wading birds mentioned. Eastern Indigo Snake (Drymarchon corais couperi) No indigo snakes have been observed on-site, however the majority of the project area could provide some habitat for indigo snakes. Considering their elusive nature, their 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 509 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) Community School of Naples PUDA Spoon Parcel Addition Collier County Environmental Supplement May 2021 17 large home range, and the wide array of habitats they may utilize, there is potential that indigo snakes could occasionally frequent portions of the project area. Florida Bonneted Bat (Eumops floridanus) The Florida bonneted bat (FBB) utilizes habitats such as hardwoods and pinelands for foraging. The Spoon Parcel does contain some pine flatwood and cypress-pine-palm habitats suitable for Florida bonneted bat foraging. The project site is located within the FBB consultation area that has been designated by Florida Fish & Wildlife Service (FWS). Surveys of the site have been conducted to search for potential roosts. A cavity tree survey was conducted, and 1 tree was located just outside the western Spoon Parcel boundary, well out of development range. The cavity will be peeped during future survey efforts and again prior to any construction activities to determine if the cavity is in use. To date no evidence of any bat presence on the site has been observed. Big Cypress Fox Squirrel (Sciurus niger) The Big Cypress fox squirrel has not been observed on-site however they have been known to utilize habitats such as cypress, cypress-pine-cabbage palm, and pine flatwoods that do exist on the project site. Much of the upland habitat is too dense to be considered desirable for the fox squirrel, but the tiny wetland fragments on the west side of the project could be suitable habitat. The proposed project would result in impacts to 0.66 acres of dense palmetto and pine flatwoods. Fox squirrels have been shown in many locations to prefer suburban habitats including golf courses and low-density residential areas. Gopher Tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus) No evidence of gopher tortoise utilization has been identified on this site. Palmetto and pine flatwood areas are mesic in nature and do not provide suitable wet season habitat for tortoises, nor is there adequate food source. Though they have the potential to burrow onsite, it is highly unlikely the site could sustain any tortoise population year- round. 4 .5 PROJECT IMPACTS TO ARCHAEOLOGICAL/ HISTORICAL RESOURCES The Florida Master Site File (MSF) indicated that there were no recorded sites in close proximity to the proposed project (see Appendix II). 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 510 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) Community School of Naples PUDA Spoon Parcel Addition Collier County Environmental Supplement May 2021 18 Should any archaeological evidence be discovered during construction, the development activities at the specific site will be immediately halted and the appropriate agency notified. Development will be suspended for a sufficient length of time to enable the County or a designated consultant to assess the find and determine the proper course of action. 4.6 PRESERVE MANAGEMENT PLAN At this time, the preserved area onsite is already under conservation easement from the first PUD, which consists of 1.66 acres of Mixed Wetland Hardwood habitat. Prior PUD requirements dictated the need for 0.25 acres of native preservation, while what was actually preserved was 1.66 acres (100%), leaving an excess of 1.41 preserve acres. The addition of the Spoon Parcel would dictate another 0.59 acres be removed from the total excess preserve acreage, leaving 0.82 acres in surplus. A Preserve Management Plan is already in place for the 1.66-acre preserve located on the southern end of the Community School property and no further preservation is proposed at this time. 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 511 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) Community School of Naples PUDA Spoon Parcel Addition Collier County Environmental Supplement May 2021 19 5.0 PROJECT CONSISTENCY WITH CCME The following Section outlines how the project is consistent with the Goals and Objectives of the Collier County Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME) of the Growth Management Plan (GMP). Each of the 13 Goals of the CCME is listed along with how that Goal is applicable to the proposed project. For those Goals that are not applicable, no further description is included. GOAL 1: TO PLAN FOR THE PROTECTION, CONSERVATION, MANAGEMENT AND APPROPRIATE USE OF THE COUNTY’S NATURAL RESOURCES. This Goal is more applicable to the County process in general than to any single project. The project has used data available from the County resources to plan the project and protect species, habitats, and resources to the greatest extent practicable. GOAL 2: TO PROTECT THE COUNTY’S SURFACE AND ESTUARINE WATER RESOURCES. The Project will undergo review by the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) as part of the ERP process. The project will also be reviewed by County reviewers during the PUD amendment and SDP applications. Surface water management, water quality concerns, and outfall quantities and locations will all undergo review and will be consistent with any regional or local Watershed Management Plans. The Project stormwater will meet all applicable State and Local water quality criteria. GOAL 3: TO PROTECT THE COUNTY'S GROUND WATER RESOURCES TO ENSURE THE HIGHEST WATER QUALITY PRACTICAL. The Project will undergo review by the SFWMD as part of the ERP process for water quality certification. Groundwater extractions for the purposes of irrigation are permitted through SFWMD review. Any irrigation use will be monitored annually to ensure that adverse impacts to groundwater resources are not adversely impacted. GOAL 4: TO CONSERVE, PROTECT AND APPROPRIATELY MANAGE THE COUNTY'S FRESH WATER RESOURCES. The Project will undergo review by the SFWMD as part of the ERP process for water quality certification. Groundwater extractions for the purposes of irrigation are permitted through SFWMD review. Any irrigation use will be monitored to ensure that adverse impacts to groundwater resources are not adversely impacted. If applicable and available, the Project will utilize treated effluent (re-use) water for irrigation. 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 512 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) Community School of Naples PUDA Spoon Parcel Addition Collier County Environmental Supplement May 2021 20 GOAL 5: TO PROTECT, CONSERVE AND APPROPRI ATELY USE THE COUNTY’S MINERAL AND SOIL RESOURCES. No mineral extraction is contemplated on the Project property. The Project will utilize appropriate BMPs to protect soils on the project site from erosion or disturbance during construction activities. Silt fencing, protective barriers, berms, and swales could all be used during construction activities on the site. GOAL 6: TO IDENTIFY, PROTECT, CONSERVE AND APPROPRIATELY USE NATIVE VEGETATIVE COMMUNITIES AND WILDLIFE HABITAT. Objective 6.1 – The Project will preserve a minimum of 15% of the existing native habitat on the project site per original PUD approval. The PUD currently provides 1.66 acres of preserved lands of which approximately 0.25 acres met the native habitat criteria, leaving a surplus of 1.41 acres. The PUDA, with the proposed addition of the Spoon parcels, requires another 0.59 acres of native preserve which will be deducted from the existing surplus. Current onsite preserve surpasses LDC preservation requirements. All preserves are being maintained to control exotic vegetation per the County code requirements. Objective 6.2 – The PUD preserve consists entirely of jurisdictional wetland habitat. Most of the potential use for listed species occurs within the preserved habitat. GOAL 7: TO PROTECT AND CONSERVE THE COUNTY’S FISHERIES AND WILDLIFE. Objective 7.1 – The Project has conducted a Listed Species Survey over the Project lands. This survey will be updated periodically during the permitting process to ensure that new species do not take up residence on the project lands without knowledge before construction commencement. Species Management Plans have been completed for the PUDA which outline how the project minimizes the risk of adversely impacting any protected species. Coordination and review with the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FFWCC) and U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service (FWS) will be undertaken to ensure that potential impacts to state and federally protected species are minimized. GOAL 8: TO MAINTAIN COLLIER COUNTY'S EXISTING AIR QUALITY. The Project will comply with all applicable State and Federal air quality standards. All site construction equipment will be maintained appropriately in terms of emissions standards and potential air pollution. 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 513 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) Community School of Naples PUDA Spoon Parcel Addition Collier County Environmental Supplement May 2021 21 GOAL 9: TO APPROPRIATELY MANAGE HAZARDOUS MATERIALS AND WASTE TO PROTECT THE COUNTY'S POPULOUS AND NATURAL RESOURCES AND TO ENSURE THE HIGHEST ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY. This Goal is more applicable to County efforts than to individual projects. GOAL 10: TO PROTECT, CONSERVE, MANAGE, AND APPROPRIATELY USE THE COUNTY’S COASTAL BARRIERS INCLUDING SHORELINES, BEACHES AND DUNES AND PLAN FOR, AND WHERE APPROPRIATE, RESTRICT ACTIVITIES WHERE SUCH ACTIVITIES WILL DAMAGE OR DESTROY COASTAL RESOURCES. This Project will not affect any coastal barriers, dunes, beaches, shorelines, or any other coastal resources. GOAL 11: TO PROVIDE FOR THE PROTECTION, RESERVATION, AND SENSITIVE RE-USE OF HISTORIC RESOURCES. This Project will not affect any historical or archaeological properties or resources. GOAL 12: TO MAKE EVERY REASONABLE EFFORT TO ENSURE THE PUBLIC SAFETY, HEALTH AND WELFARE OF PEOPLE AND PROPERTY FROM THE EFFECTS OF HURRICANE STORM DAMAGE. The Project is not located within the County’s Coastal High Hazard Area. All building construction on the Project will be subject to building code regulation and will adhere to construction standards with respect to wind loadings and hurricane protection. On- site construction will have a hurricane preparedness plan outlining steps to follow should a hurricane approach while site construction is under way. GOAL 13: TO AVOID UNNECESSARY DUPLICATION OF EXISTING REGULATORY PROGRAMS. The Project will undergo review by the SFWMD, and FWC. Review by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (under the new 404 assumption) is not expected due to the fact that no federal jurisdictional areas will be impacted by the development, however wetland determinations have not been verified at this time. All correspondence and permitting undertaken with these agencies will be provided to the County upon request to assist with County review and minimize duplication of permitting efforts. 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 514 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) EXHIBIT 1 LOCATION MAP 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 515 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) STATE OF FLORIDACOUNTY AERIAL VICINITY MAPSTATE OF FLORIDACOUNTY AERIAL VICINITY MAPNOTES:<> THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SUBJECTPROPERTYSUBJECTPROPERTY<> LATITUDE:N 26.219004<> LONGITUDE:W -81.754284SITE ADDRESS:<> 13275 LIVINGSTON RD NAPLES, FL 34109Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@thanaples.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\21074.00 community school spoon parcel\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\21074-COUNTY-PUD.dwg LOCATION MAP 5/19/2021THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY:CHANGED:SHEET NO.:RY NO. 5875MNRMJ05-19-2121074.00-1225COMMUNITY SCHOOL OF NAPLESLOCATION MAP49-------------------01 OF 08COLLIER COUNTYCOLLIER COUNTYGULF OF MEXICOGULF OF MEXICO8588288641MARCOISLANDEVERGLADESCITY9329846NAPLES90908399483783784129292983983992887846951862I-758486431856850846890896NESWKEY WESTTAMPAFT.MYERSMIAMINAPLESSUBJECTPROPERTY9.A.2.ePacket Pg. 516Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of EXHIBIT 2 EXISTING AERIAL 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 517 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) NESW0200400800SCALE IN FEETSITE ADDRESS:,13275 LIVINGSTON RDNAPLESFL34109Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@thanaples.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\21074.00 community school spoon parcel\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\21074-COUNTY-PUD.dwg EXISTING AERIAL 5/19/2021THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY:CHANGED:SHEET NO.:RY NO. 5875MNRMJ05-19-2121074.00-1225COMMUNITY SCHOOL OF NAPLESEXISTING AERIAL49-------------------02 OF 08OSCEOLA TRAIL LIVINGSTON RDPINE RIDGE ROAD PROPERTYBOUNDARYSUBJECTPROPERTY9.A.2.ePacket Pg. 518Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of EXHIBIT 3 FLUCFCS MAP 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 519 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) N E S W0 200 400800SCALE IN FEETTurrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@thanaples.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\21074.00 community school spoon parcel\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\21074-COUNTY-PUD.dwg FLUCFCS MAP 5/19/2021THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY: CHANGED:SHEET NO.:RY NO. 5875MNRMJ05-19-2121074.00-1225COMMUNITY SCHOOL OF NAPLESFLUCFCS MAP49-------------------03 OF 08UPLAND (ACRES):WETLAND (ACRES):PROJECT (ACRES):3.953.260.69·SURVEY COURTESY OF:··SURVEY DATED:NOTES:·THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY ANDARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE."RWA, INC."03-08-21SUBJECT PROPERTY(SPOON PARCEL)740617624/610E1624/610E1624/610E1321/411E2SPOON PARCELFLUCFCSDESCRIPTIONAREA(AC)321/411E2PALMETTO PRAIRIES/PINE FLATWOODSEXOTICS 25-60%3.23617MIXED WETLAND HARDWOODS0.40624/610E1CYPRESS - PINE - CABBAGE PALM/WETLAND HARDWOOD FORESTSEXOTICS 0-25%0.29740DISTURBED LAND0.03TOTAL3.95PROPERTY BOUNDARY(MAIN PARCEL)170EXISTINGNATIVEHABITATMAIN PARCELFLUCFCSDESCRIPTIONAREA(AC)170INSTITUTIONAL71.34-EXISTING NATIVE HABITAT PRESERVE1.66TOTAL73.00OSCEOLA TRAIL LIVINGSTON RDPINE RIDGE ROAD 9.A.2.ePacket Pg. 520Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of EXHIBIT 4 PROPOSED SITE PLAN 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 521 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) LLp:\21074.00 community school spoon parcel\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\21074-COUNTY-PUD.dwg 5/19/2021N ESW0 100 200400SCALE IN FEETTurrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@thanaples.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\21074.00 community school spoon parcel\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\21074-COUNTY-PUD.dwg PROPOSED SITE 5/19/2021THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY: CHANGED:SHEET NO.:RY NO. 5875MNRMJ05-19-2121074.00-1225COMMUNITY SCHOOL OF NAPLESPROPOSED SITE PLAN49-------------------04 OF 08SUBJECTPROPERTYPROPERTYBOUNDARYSITEPLANPROVIDED BYRWA, INC.EXISTING NATIVE HABITATPRESERVE 1.66 AC9.A.2.ePacket Pg. 522Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of EXHIBIT 5 IMPACTS MAP 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 523 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) LLN ESW0100200 400SCALE IN FEETTurrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@thanaples.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\21074.00 community school spoon parcel\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\21074-COUNTY-PUD.dwg IMPACTS MAP 5/19/2021THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY:CHANGED:SHEET NO.:RY NO. 5875MNRMJ05-19-2121074.00-1225COMMUNITY SCHOOL OF NAPLESIMPACTS MAP49-------------------05 OF 08·SURVEY COURTESY OF:··SURVEY DATED:NOTES:·THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY ANDARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE."RWA, INC."03-08-21NATIVE HABITAT UPLANDVEGETATION IMPACTS (SQ FT)28,713 (0.66 AC)SUBJECTPROPERTYPROPERTYBOUNDARYSITEPLANPROVIDED BYRWA, INC.NATIVE HABITAT UPLANDVEGETATION IMPACTSEXISTING NATIVE HABITATPRESERVE 1.66 AC9.A.2.ePacket Pg. 524Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of EXHIBIT 6 NATIVE HABITAT MAP 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 525 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) N ESW0 100 200400SCALE IN FEETTurrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@thanaples.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\21074.00 community school spoon parcel\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\21074-COUNTY-PUD.dwg NATIVE HABITAT MAP 5/19/2021THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY: CHANGED:SHEET NO.:RY NO. 5875MNRMJ05-19-2121074.00-1225COMMUNITY SCHOOL OF NAPLESNATIVE HABITAT MAP49-------------------06 OF 08NATIVE HABITAT (ACRES):SUBJECTPROPERTY740617624/610E1624/610E1624/610E1624/610E1321/411E2FLUCFCSDESCRIPTIONAREA(AC)IMPACT(AC)321/411E2PALMETTO PRAIRIES/PINE FLATWOODS EXOTICS 25-60%3.23 0.66617MIXED WETLAND HARDWOODS0.40 0.00624/610E1CYPRESS - PINE - CABBAGE PALM/WETLAND HARDWOOD FORESTSEXOTICS 0-25%0.29 0.00TOTAL3.92 0.66PROPERTYBOUNDARY3.92NATIVE VEGETATIONORIGINAL PUD NATIVE HABITAT PROVIDED IS 1.66 AC.ORIGINAL PUD NATIVE HABITAT REQUIRED IS 0.25 AC.ORIGINAL PUD NATIVE HABITAT TO BE UTILIZED IS 1.41 AC.NEW PARCEL PUD NATIVE HABITAT ON SITE IS 3.92 AC.NEW PARCEL PUD NATIVE HABITAT PROVIDED IS 3.26 AC.1.66 + 3.92 = 5.58 (5.58 X 15% = 0.84 AC REQUIRED)5.58 ACRES NATIVE VEGETATION. GMP REQUIRES 15%PRESERVATION OF NATIVE VEGETATION. FOR THIS SITE, AMINIMUM OF 0.84 ACRES OF NATIVE VEGETATION MUST BEPRESERVED. THIS SITE WILL PROVIDE 1.66 AC. OF NATIVEVEGETATION PRESERVE.NATIVEHABITATAREANATIVE HABITAT UPLANDVEGETATION IMPACTSN A T I V E H A B I T A T U P L A N DV E G E T A T I O N I M P A C T S ( A C )0.66EXISTING NATIVE HABITATPRESERVE 1.66 AC9.A.2.ePacket Pg. 526Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of EXHIBIT 7 LISTED SPECIES SURVEY MAP 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 527 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) N E S W0100200 400SCALE IN FEETTurrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@thanaples.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\21074.00 community school spoon parcel\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\21074-COUNTY-PUD.dwg LISTED SPECIES SURVEY MAP 5/19/2021THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY:CHANGED:SHEET NO.:RY NO. 5875MNRMJ05-19-2121074.00-1225COMMUNITY SCHOOL OF NAPLESLISTED SPECIES SURVEY MAP49-------------------07 OF 08·SURVEY COURTESY OF:··SURVEY DATED:NOTES:·THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY ANDARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE."RWA, INC."03-08-21SUBJECTPROPERTYPROPERTYBOUNDARYCAVITY TREE LAT: 26.215815LONG: -81.756676TRANSECT LINE(TYP)9.A.2.ePacket Pg. 528Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of EXHIBIT 8 SOILS MAP 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 529 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) N E S W0100200 400SCALE IN FEETTurrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@thanaples.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\21074.00 community school spoon parcel\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\21074-COUNTY-PUD.dwg SOILS MAP 5/19/2021THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY:CHANGED:SHEET NO.:RY NO. 5875MNRMJ05-19-2121074.00-1225COMMUNITY SCHOOL OF NAPLESSOILS MAP49-------------------08 OF 08·SURVEY COURTESY OF:··SURVEY DATED:NOTES:·THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY ANDARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.·SOIL DATA PROVIDED BY:1998 UNITED STATES DEPT OF AGRICULTURESOIL SURVEY OF COLLIER COUNTY AREA, FL"RWA, INC."03-08-21CODEDESCRIPTIONHYDRIC3MALABAR FINE SANDYES27HOLOPAW FINE SANDYES33URBAN LAND-HOLOPAW-BASINGERCOMPLEXNO27333SUBJECTPROPERTYPROPERTYBOUNDARY9.A.2.ePacket Pg. 530Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of APPENDIX I LISTED SPECIES SURVEY 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 531 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) COMMUNITY SCHOOL OF NAPLES LISTED SPECIES SURVEY MAY 2021 PREPARED BY: TURRELL, HALL & ASSOCIATES, INC. 3584 EXCHANGE AVENUE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 643-0166 marielle@thanaples.com 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 532 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) Community School of Naples CFPUD – Spoon Parcel Addition Section 12, Township 49 South, Range 25 East, Collier County. Listed Species Survey May 2021 2 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Community School of Naples CFPUD encompasses a total of approximately 73 acres of Section 12, Township 49 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. An additional 3.95 acres of wooded land is proposed for addition to the 73 acres, known as the Spoon Parcel. An amendment to the PUD is proposed for the purposes of adding structures to the west campus and minor parking on the 3.95-acre parcel. This listed species survey was conducted on the 3.95-acre Spoon Parcel, which can be characterized as primarily palmetto and pine flatwood habitat with moderate to low exotic species coverage and two wetland habitats with little to no exotic species present. In addition to natural habitat, there is also a 0.03-acre filled and permitted but unpaved roadway between the Community School and Osceola Elementary School, which was never paved. The first wetland can be described as pine, cypress, cabbage palm with laurel oak and it is located immediately west and north of the large natural upland habitat. A mixed wetland hardwood habitat comprised of buttonwood, pop ash and coastal willow, primarily, is located on the slender ‘handle’ of the parcel, separated from the southern wetland by the small bisecting roadway. Access to this parcel is primarily via a west campus side road, via a gate off Osceola Trail. To consider potential effects of the proposed project on any state or federally listed species that may utilize the property for feeding/foraging and/or nesting, a Threatened and Endangered Species Survey was performed. This report summarizes the results of the survey activities that have been undertaken to-date on the subject parcel. Ongoing survey time will continue through the various permitting stages and prior to construction commencement. 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 533 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) Community School of Naples CFPUD – Spoon Parcel Addition Section 12, Township 49 South, Range 25 East, Collier County. Listed Species Survey May 2021 3 2.0 METHODOLOGY Prior to any wildlife survey, careful consideration is given to the habitat type(s) in question and species that are known to utilize such areas. Before any survey is carried out a number of publications and references are consulted. These include: The Official List of Florida’s Endangered Species, Threatened Species and Species of Special Concern (latest dated December 2018), Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWCC) Wildlife Methodology Guidelines, The Standardized State-Listed Animal Survey Procedures for SFWMD ERP Projects, and the Florida Natural Areas Inventory (FNAI) for Collier County. The basic objective of any wildlife survey is to obtain evidence that a listed species is using the subject site. The site may comprise a primary or secondary feeding/foraging or nesting zone or merely be adjacent to those sites for a particular listed species. As many species of concern in Florida are cryptic/camouflaged and/or nocturnal/ crepuscular, patience and sufficient time must be devoted to the survey. Aerial photos and FLUCFCS mapping are consulted prior to arriving on-site and a system of meandering transects is followed throughout the subject area. The most recent field study traversed the entire site in a series of transects spaced approximately 25 to 50 feet apart. Fieldwork for this update is out lined below in Table 1. A slow pace along transects was maintained, stopping every few minutes to look and listen for movement or calls of any animal. Indirect evidence such as rooting, scrape marks, nests, cavities, burrows, tracks, and scat were also noted. Special consideration was given to tree-top observation for potential fox squirrel daybeds or nests and tree cavities. The project site is within Florida bonneted bats (FBB) consultation area, so care was given cavity searches and other potential FBB roosting locations. A list of dates and times of wildlife surveys for this latest effort is provided, along with observed species below. 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 534 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) Community School of Naples CFPUD – Spoon Parcel Addition Section 12, Township 49 South, Range 25 East, Collier County. Listed Species Survey May 2021 4 3.0 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Table 1- Site survey information Date Time Ambient Conditions Staff 4/23/21 15:35- 18:30 85°F, mostly sunny, winds 10-15 mph Marielle Nageon de Lestang 5/3/21 15:10- 18:27 91°F, partly cloudy, winds 5-10 mph Marielle Nageon de Lestang 5/5/21 7:05- 10:28 80°F, sunny, winds 0-8 mph Marielle Nageon de Lestang 5/6/21 7:00- 10:20 82°F, sunny, winds 5-10 mph Marielle Nageon de Lestang A list of all wildlife species observed on or adjacent to the site during the course of this and previous surveys is provided below. COMMON NAME SCIENTIFIC NAME LISTING STATUS Birds mourning dove Zenaida macroura None red-bellied woodpecker Melanerpes carolinus None pileated woodpecker (heard) Dryocopus pileatus None cardinal Cardinalis cardinalis None turkey vulture * Cathartes aura None unidentified warblers Mammals nine-banded armadillo burrow Dasypus novemcinctus None marsh rabbit Sylvilagus palustris None cottontail rabbit Sylvilagus floridanus None grey squirrel Sciurus carolinensis None raccoon scat Procyon lotor None Butterflies monarch butterfly Danaus plexippus None *Observed on adjacent properties or flying overhead. One cavity tree was located in the wetland area right on the western property line in a dead slash pine. The tree cavity will be peeped during future survey updates and again prior to any construction commencement even though it lies far outside the impact area. 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 535 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) Community School of Naples CFPUD – Spoon Parcel Addition Section 12, Township 49 South, Range 25 East, Collier County. Listed Species Survey May 2021 5 A list of species that would be expected to occur on the subject site can be given through analysis of known vegetative communities both on-site and contiguous, and available background data. Sources include the US Fish & Wildlife Service (FWS) Multi Species Recovery Plan, Part 2, Appendix C, Species of Concern and their Respective Community Types in South Florida, in addition to communication with personnel at state and federal wildlife agencies. Vegetative communities are presented by FLUCFCS code with numbers in accordance with the supporting map (Exhibit 2) together with potential wildlife species. Consideration of the suitability and likelihood for a given community to support a particular species is given in light of adjacent and contiguous land uses. Abbreviations used in the discussion are as follows: F = Federal S = State E = Endangered T = Threatened SSC = Florida Species of Special Concern C = Federal Candidate *= FWS Species of Management Concern ** = Protected Under Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act R = Rare Appendix C lists potential species within the community types below in Tables 2 and 3. Table 2- Potential Species for Scrubby Flatwoods or Mesic Flatwoods FLUCFCS 321/411- Palmetto Prairie/ Pine Flatwood (Scrubby-Mesic Flatwoods) Common Name Scientific Name Federal Status State Status Florida panther Puma concolor coryi FE SE Big Cypress fox squirrel Sciurus niger avicennia * ST Sherman’s fox squirrel Sciurus niger shermani * ST Florida black bear Ursus americanus floridanus FC ST Florida sandhill crane Antigone canadensis pratensis ST Florida scrub jay Aphelocoma coerulescens FT ST southeastern American kestrel Falco sparverius paulus * ST bald eagle Haliaetus leucocephalus ** ** red-cockaded woodpecker Picoides borealis FE SE Audubon’s crested caracara Polyborus plancus audubonii FT ST Kirtland’s warbler Setophaga kirtlandii FE SE eastern indigo snake Drymarchon corais couperi FT ST gopher tortoise Gopherus polyphemus C ST 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 536 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) Community School of Naples CFPUD – Spoon Parcel Addition Section 12, Township 49 South, Range 25 East, Collier County. Listed Species Survey May 2021 6 None of the above listed were noted utilizing this parcel or flying overhead. Table 3- Potential Species for Hydric Pine Flatwoods FLUCFCS 617 & 624/610- Mixed Wetland Hardwood & Pine, Cypress, Cabbage Palm/ Wetland Hardwood (Hydric Pine Flatwoods) Common Name Scientific Name Federal Status State Status Sherman’s short-tailed shrew Blarina carolinensis shermani * ST Everglades mink Neovison vison evergladensis ST Florida panther Puma concolor coryi FE SE Big Cypress fox squirrel Sciurus niger avicennia * ST Sherman’s fox squirrel Sciurus niger shermani * ST Florida black bear Ursus americanus floridanus FC ST roseate spoonbill Platalea ajaja ST Florida sandhill crane Antigone canadensis pratensis ST Florida scrub jay Aphelocoma coerulescens FT ST little blue heron Egretta caerulea ST tricolor heron Egretta tricolor ST southeastern American kestrel Falco sparverius paulus * ST bald eagle Haliaetus leucocephalus ** ** woodstork Mycteria americana FE SE red-cockaded woodpecker Picoides borealis FE SE Audubon’s crested caracara Polyborus plancus audubonii FT ST Everglades snail kite Rostrhamus sociabilis FE SE Kirtland’s warbler Setophaga kirtlandii FE SE eastern indigo snake Drymarchon corais couperi FT ST gopher tortoise Gopherus polyphemus C ST None of the above listed were noted utilizing this parcel or flying overhead. 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 537 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) Community School of Naples CFPUD – Spoon Parcel Addition Section 12, Township 49 South, Range 25 East, Collier County. Listed Species Survey May 2021 7 4.0 SUMMARY The existing condition of the subject site is primarily mesic palmetto and pine flatwood, with transitional wetland on the extreme outer ring and wetland to the north of the disturbed roadway. Evidence of hydrology depicts water elevations up to 13 or 14 inches in the wetland areas, but the soil plugs were too dry to sample properly indicating flashing hydrological conditions. Exotic species coverage is highest to the southern end of the site, but none exceeds 50-60% in any location. Special interest in the property as Big Cypress fox squirrel habitat was considered during the survey efforts. Investigation of the site in the course of this study has shown that the property offers, at best, limited use potential for any wildlife due to the flashy hydrology and its proximity to various schools. There are no known bird rookeries or red-cockaded nesting colonies in the vicinity of this site and since it is west of I-75, Florida Panther is not a concern. Development of the subject site is not expected to result in detrimental impacts to state or federally listed wildlife species, primarily because surrounding activities and altered hydrology, as outlined above, have reduced the sites’ ability to support populations of listed species. It does have the potential to hose non-listed resident and transient species though. Preservation and enhancement of the native preserve area will continue to provide feeding/foraging opportunities for all species currently utilizing the area. Habitat Management Plans have been created and will be implemented. These plans call for site-specific management activities to take place that will improve habitat value for the target species and protect potential species utilizing the site during construction activities. These plans are provided as part of the Spoon Parcel PUDA application. 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 538 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) STATE OF FLORIDACOUNTY AERIAL VICINITY MAPSTATE OF FLORIDACOUNTY AERIAL VICINITY MAPNOTES:<> THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SUBJECTPROPERTYSUBJECTPROPERTY<> LATITUDE:N 26.219004<> LONGITUDE:W -81.754284SITE ADDRESS:<> 13275 LIVINGSTON RD NAPLES, FL 34109Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@thanaples.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\21074.00 community school spoon parcel\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\21074-COUNTY-PUD.dwg LOCATION MAP 5/19/2021THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY:CHANGED:SHEET NO.:RY NO. 5875MNRMJ05-19-2121074.00-1225COMMUNITY SCHOOL OF NAPLESLOCATION MAP49-------------------01 OF 08COLLIER COUNTYCOLLIER COUNTYGULF OF MEXICOGULF OF MEXICO8588288641MARCOISLANDEVERGLADESCITY9329846NAPLES90908399483783784129292983983992887846951862I-758486431856850846890896NESWKEY WESTTAMPAFT.MYERSMIAMINAPLESSUBJECTPROPERTY9.A.2.ePacket Pg. 539Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of N E S W0200400 800SCALE IN FEETTurrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@thanaples.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\21074.00 community school spoon parcel\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\21074-COUNTY-PUD.dwg FLUCFCS MAP 5/19/2021THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY:CHANGED:SHEET NO.:RY NO. 5875MNRMJ05-19-2121074.00-1225COMMUNITY SCHOOL OF NAPLESFLUCFCS MAP49-------------------03 OF 08UPLAND (ACRES):WETLAND (ACRES):PROJECT (ACRES):3.953.260.69·SURVEY COURTESY OF:··SURVEY DATED:NOTES:·THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY ANDARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE."RWA, INC."03-08-21SUBJECT PROPERTY(SPOON PARCEL)740617624/610E1624/610E1624/610E1321/411E2SPOON PARCELFLUCFCSDESCRIPTIONAREA(AC)321/411E2PALMETTO PRAIRIES/PINE FLATWOODSEXOTICS 25-60%3.23617MIXED WETLAND HARDWOODS0.40624/610E1CYPRESS - PINE - CABBAGE PALM/WETLAND HARDWOOD FORESTSEXOTICS 0-25%0.29740DISTURBED LAND0.03TOTAL3.95PROPERTY BOUNDARY(MAIN PARCEL)170EXISTINGNATIVEHABITATMAIN PARCELFLUCFCSDESCRIPTIONAREA(AC)170INSTITUTIONAL71.34617EXISTING NATIVE HABITAT PRESERVE1.66TOTAL73.00OSCEOLA TRAIL LIVINGSTON RDPINE RIDGE ROAD617 9.A.2.ePacket Pg. 540Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of N E S W0100200 400SCALE IN FEETTurrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@thanaples.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\21074.00 community school spoon parcel\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\21074-COUNTY-PUD.dwg LISTED SPECIES SURVEY MAP 5/19/2021THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY:CHANGED:SHEET NO.:RY NO. 5875MNRMJ05-19-2121074.00-1225COMMUNITY SCHOOL OF NAPLESLISTED SPECIES SURVEY MAP49-------------------07 OF 08·SURVEY COURTESY OF:··SURVEY DATED:NOTES:·THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY ANDARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE."RWA, INC."03-08-21SUBJECTPROPERTYPROPERTYBOUNDARYCAVITY TREE LAT: 26.215815LONG: -81.756676TRANSECT LINE(TYP)9.A.2.ePacket Pg. 541Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of APPENDIX II DIVISION OF HISTORICAL RESOURCES MASTER SITE FILE INFORMATION 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 542 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) CYPRESS CROSSING Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AeroGRID, IGN, and the GIS User Community 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 543 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of SiteID Type Site Name Address Additional Info SHPO Eval NR Status CR00228 AR CYPRESS CROSSING AR=1 SS=0 CM=0 RG=0 BR=0 Total=1 Cultural Resource Roster Page 1 of 1 Created: 5/10/2021Florida Master Site File 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 544 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of MS#Title Publication Information Year 1108 Historical/architectural survey of Collier County, Florida Florida Preservation Services 1986 7948 An Archaeological and Historical Survey of the Proposed CR South Tower Location in Collier County, Florida PANAMERICAN CONSULTANTS, INC., TAMPA. Submitted TO ATC ASSOCIATES, INC., MIAMI, FLORIDA 2001 11290 An Archaeological and Historical Survey of the North Trade Center Tower Location in Collier County, Florida Ambrosino, Meghan L. 2005. An Archaeological and Historical Survey of the North Trade Center Tower Location in Collier County, Florida, Panamerican Consultants, Inc- Tampa 2005 Manuscript Roster Total=3 1 of 1 Florida Master Site File Created: 5/10/20219.A.2.e Packet Pg. 545 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of APPENDIX III LISTED SPECIES MANAGEMENT PLANS 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 546 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) COMMUNITY SCHOOL OF NAPLES EASTERN INDIGO SNAKE SPECIES MANAGEMENT PLAN MAY 2021 PREPARED BY: TURRELL, HALL & ASSOCIATES, INC. 3584 EXCHANGE AVENUE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 643-0166 marielle@thanaples.com 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 547 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) Eastern Indigo Snake Species Management Plan Community School of Naples 2 1.0 INTRODUCTION This report provides project management guidelines for the maintenance of transient and foraging habitat for the Eastern Indigo snake (Drymarchon courais couperi). This document includes information on indigo snakes’ ecological and biological characteristics as well as habitat requirements. A description of how planning and site development has been guided in consideration of the snakes is given as well as the management plan. The plan briefly describes habitat that will be available and other relevant information. 2.0 PROJECT LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION The Community School of Naples property is approximately 73± acres in size, located at 13275 Livingston Road approximately 0.13 miles north of Pine Ridge Road. The property is situated within Section 12, Township 49 South, Range 25 East, Collier, County, Florida. Access to school grounds occurs via a security gate just south of Osceola Trail or an entrance north of Pine Ridge Road situated between Cypress Glen Condominiums and the Sports Camp. The additional Spoon Parcel, which is proposed for partial construction onsite, lies on the southwestern-most side of the site and is best accessed via a gated pathway off Osceola Trail along the west side of the main campus and athletic fields. The applicant will be adding and developing 0.66 acres of a 3.95-acre parcel that was designated as “future phase” in earlier permits, making the total site size 77± acres. In addition to the new acreage, some features on the west campus will be added/changed. Proposed campus changes include a basketball court, a turf field, new lower school dining facility, new dumpster facility, and a relocated play area. The Spoon Parcel, which is currently wooded, would be impacted to slightly expand parking for the west school campus. 3.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS AND HABTIAT DESCRIPTIONS Vegetative communities of the newly added Spoon Parcel include upland palmetto/pine habitat and disturbed (filled) lands, as well as some laurel oak wetland and pine, cypress, cabbage palm wetland. The existing habitat types (based on FLUCFCS codes) are shown below. FLUCFCS Acreage WETLANDS Pine, Cypress, Cabbage Palm/Wetland Hardwood (15% Exotic) 624/610 E1 0.29 Mixed Wetland Hardwood 617 0.40 Total Wetland Habitat 0.69 UPLANDS Palmetto Prairie/Pine Flatwood (25-60% Exotic) 321/411 E2 3.23 Disturbed Land 740 0.03 Total Upland Habitat 3.26 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 548 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) Eastern Indigo Snake Species Management Plan Community School of Naples 3 The habitat proposed for impact at this time is the Palmetto Prairie/ Pine Flatwood (321/411 E2) which is dominated by saw palmetto (Serenoa repens), slash pine (Pinus elliottii), downy-rose myrtle (Rhodomyrtus tomentosa), ear-leaf acacia (Acacia auriculiformis) and cocoplum (Chrysobalanus icaco). Remaining habitat set aside for future use is the same habitat as is being impacted. Jurisdictional wetland areas are the very western extend of the ‘spoon’ and in the ‘handle’ of the parcel. The wetland habitat is not slated for development. 4.0 EASTERN INDIGO SNAKE Ongoing observations have been conducted on the property and will continue up to construction. All surveys were conducted according to guidelines of the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC). No evidence of any indigo snakes has been observed but given the nature of these animals and the difficulty in observing them without being right on top of them it must be assumed that their presence on the property is a possibility. Prior to any work commencing on the property, a pre-construction survey will be required to examine the staked clearing areas for evidence of listed species including indigo snakes. 4.1 Occurrence Onsite While no individuals of this federally listed snake were observed on site during the threatened and endangered species survey, the presence of suitable habitat allows the possibility that the site may be home to or part of the territory of the species. This management plan provides specific measures for species protection should an individual be located. 4.2 Biology The eastern indigo snake was federally listed as threatened in 1978 due to dramatic population declines caused by over-collecting for the domestic and international pet trade as well as mortalities caused by rattlesnake collectors who gassed gopher tortoise burrows to collect snakes (43 FR 4028). No critical habitat has been designated for eastern indigo snakes therefore none will be affected. Species/Critical Habitat Description The eastern indigo snake is a large, black, non-venomous snake found in the southeastern U.S. It is widely distributed throughout central and south Florida, but primarily occurs in sandhill habitats in northern Florida and southern Georgia. The eastern indigo snake was listed as a threatened species as a result of dramatic population declines caused by over-collecting for the domestic and international pet trade, as well as mortalities caused by rattlesnake collectors who gassed gopher tortoise burrows to collect snakes. Since its listing as a federal and state threatened species, habitat loss and fragmentation have become much more significant threats to the eastern indigo snake. No critical habitat has been designated for the eastern indigo snake. 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 549 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) Eastern Indigo Snake Species Management Plan Community School of Naples 4 Over most of its range, the eastern indigo snake frequents several habitat types, including pine flatwoods, scrubby flatwoods, high pine, dry prairie, tropical hardwood hammocks, edges of freshwater marshes, agricultural fields, coastal dunes, and human-altered habitats. Eastern indigo snakes need a mosaic of habitats to complete their annual cycle. Interspersion of tortoise- inhabited sandhills and wetlands improves habitat quality for this species. Eastern indigo snakes require sheltered retreats from winter cold and desiccating conditions. Wherever the eastern indigo snake occurs in xeric habitats, it is closely associated with the gopher tortoise, the burrows of which provide shelter from winter cold and desiccation. In wetter habitats that lack gopher tortoises, eastern indigo snakes may take shelter in hollowed root channels, hollow logs, or the burrows of rodents, armadillo, or land crabs. In the milder climates of central and southern Florida, eastern indigo snakes exist in a more stable thermal environment, where availability of thermal refugia may not be as critical to the snake's survival. Throughout peninsular Florida, this species may be found in all terrestrial habitats, which have not suffered high-density urban development. They are especially common in the hydric hammocks throughout this region. In extreme south Florida, these snakes are typically found in pine flatwoods, pine rocklands, tropical hardwood hammocks, and in most other undeveloped areas. Eastern indigo snakes also use some agricultural lands (e.g., citrus) and various types of wetlands. Even though thermal stress may not be a limiting factor throughout the year in south Florida, eastern indigo snakes still seek and use underground refugia in the region. Life history/Population Dynamics Most information on the reproductive cycle of eastern indigo snakes is from data collected in north Florida. Here, breeding occurs between November and April, and females deposit four to 12 eggs during May or June. Eggs are laid from late May through August, and young hatch in approximately three months. Peak hatching activity occurs between August and September, and yearling activity peaks in April and May. Limited information on the reproductive cycle in south- central Florida suggests that the breeding and egg laying season may be extended. In this region, breeding extends from June to January, laying occurs from April to July, and hatching occurs during mid-summer to early fall. Female indigo snakes can store sperm and delay fertilization of eggs. There is no information on how long eastern indigo snakes live in the wild; in captivity, the longest an eastern indigo snake lived was 25 years, 11 months (Shaw 1959). Status and Distribution Historically, the eastern indigo snake occurred throughout Florida and in the coastal plain of Georgia, Alabama and Mississippi. Georgia and Florida currently support the remaining endemic populations of the eastern indigo snake. In south Florida, the eastern indigo snake is thought to be widely distributed. Given their preference for upland habitats, eastern indigos are not commonly found in great numbers in the wetland complexes of the Everglades region. As stated above, the eastern indigo snake was listed because of a population decline caused by habitat loss, over-collecting for the pet trade, mortality from gassing gopher tortoise burrows to collect rattlesnakes, in addition to a similar vulnerability to contaminant accumulation as seen on the Bald eagle. At the time of listing, the main factor in the decline of this species was attributed to exploitation for the pet trade. As a result of effective law enforcement, the pressure from collectors has declined but still remains a concern. The eastern indigo snake will use most of the 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 550 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) Eastern Indigo Snake Species Management Plan Community School of Naples 5 habitat types available in its home range, but prefers open, undeveloped areas. Because of its relatively large home range, this snake is especially vulnerable to habitat loss, degradation, and fragmentation. Extensive tracts of wild land are the most important refuge for large numbers of eastern indigo snakes. The wide distribution and large territory size of the eastern indigo snake complicate evaluation of its population status and trends. 5.0 SITE DEVELOPMENT CONSIDERATIONS & SPECIES MANAGEMENT PROTOCOL The Florida Fish & Wildlife Service (FWS) has developed standard Indigo Snake Management Guidelines which take the form of an educational program for all personnel associated with construction on the site. A copy of the hand-out is attached and will be distributed prior to the start of work in addition to being laminated and located in prominent areas. The total project area associated with this new impact zone is approximately 0.66 acres in size. Of this 0.66 acres, or 100% of it would qualify as Indigo snake habitat. Adjacent to the impact zone are still __acres of undeveloped upland which also would qualify as habitat for the Eastern Indigo snake, slated for future use. Collier County building code would require the removal of all exotic species from the areas not impacted by development at this time and before issuing occupancy certification, so habitat improvement will be made. The spoon parcel will also be maintained free of exotic plant species until such time another authorization is sought to enlarge the building footprint. Educational information (see enclosed pamphlet) and signage will be in place onsite to inform construction crews, students and faculty to avoid adverse interactions with on-site wildlife including indigo snakes. Prior to clearing or construction, construction personnel will be briefed on indigo snakes and given appropriate directives and contact information should any snakes be observed during the construction activities. 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 551 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) EASTERN INDIGO SNAKE Drymarchon corais couperi Las víboras Indigo no son venenosas! Las víboras Indigo son prtoegidas por la ley, con riesgos de que se apliquen multas o tiempo en la cárcel! Si ve alguna, por favor no la moleste y deje que la víbora se aleje por si sola. Eastern Indigo Snakes are NOT poisonous and ARE protected by State and Federal Law! If you see one, please stop what you are doing and allow it to leave on its own. Do NOT harass the snake in any way. Eastern Indigos are large snakes (up to 8 feet in length), shiny bluish-black in color, with a thick body. They also have a reddish-brown chin and throat. They eat their prey live, without constricting it first, by unhinging their jaw and swallowing it whole. Indigo snakes prefer dry habitats and nest in Gopher tortoise burrows, stumps, brush piles and Armadillo burrows. They typically lay 5-12 white, leathery eggs. When clearing or performing tree removal in upland areas, be watchful for Indigo snakes trying to get out of harm’s way. If one is seen, do not harass it or kill it. Do not try to relocate it yourself. Please call the Florida Fish & Wildlife Conservation Commission at 800-282-8002 or the US Fish & Wildlife Service at 772-562-3909 if a live Indigo snake will not move out of harms way or if a dead Indigo snake is found onsite. Also call the agent- Turrell, Hall & Associates 239-643-0166. Please keep your pets leashed at all times when outside, since domestic animals are one of the biggest threats to wildlife populations in developed areas. In addition to leashing your pets, please watch your posted road speeds. 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 552 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of STATE OF FLORIDACOUNTY AERIAL VICINITY MAPSTATE OF FLORIDACOUNTY AERIAL VICINITY MAPNOTES:<> THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SUBJECTPROPERTYSUBJECTPROPERTY<> LATITUDE:N 26.219004<> LONGITUDE:W -81.754284SITE ADDRESS:<> 13275 LIVINGSTON RD NAPLES, FL 34109Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@thanaples.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\21074.00 community school spoon parcel\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\21074-COUNTY-PUD.dwg LOCATION MAP 5/19/2021THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY:CHANGED:SHEET NO.:RY NO. 5875MNRMJ05-19-2121074.00-1225COMMUNITY SCHOOL OF NAPLESLOCATION MAP49-------------------01 OF 08COLLIER COUNTYCOLLIER COUNTYGULF OF MEXICOGULF OF MEXICO8588288641MARCOISLANDEVERGLADESCITY9329846NAPLES90908399483783784129292983983992887846951862I-758486431856850846890896NESWKEY WESTTAMPAFT.MYERSMIAMINAPLESSUBJECTPROPERTY9.A.2.ePacket Pg. 553Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of N E S W0 200 400800SCALE IN FEETTurrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@thanaples.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\21074.00 community school spoon parcel\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\21074-COUNTY-PUD.dwg FLUCFCS MAP 5/19/2021THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY: CHANGED:SHEET NO.:RY NO. 5875MNRMJ05-19-2121074.00-1225COMMUNITY SCHOOL OF NAPLESFLUCFCS MAP49-------------------03 OF 08UPLAND (ACRES):WETLAND (ACRES):PROJECT (ACRES):3.953.260.69·SURVEY COURTESY OF:··SURVEY DATED:NOTES:·THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY ANDARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE."RWA, INC."03-08-21SUBJECT PROPERTY(SPOON PARCEL)740617624/610E1624/610E1624/610E1321/411E2SPOON PARCELFLUCFCSDESCRIPTIONAREA(AC)321/411E2PALMETTO PRAIRIES/PINE FLATWOODSEXOTICS 25-60%3.23617MIXED WETLAND HARDWOODS0.40624/610E1CYPRESS - PINE - CABBAGE PALM/WETLAND HARDWOOD FORESTSEXOTICS 0-25%0.29740DISTURBED LAND0.03TOTAL3.95PROPERTY BOUNDARY(MAIN PARCEL)170EXISTINGNATIVEHABITATMAIN PARCELFLUCFCSDESCRIPTIONAREA(AC)170INSTITUTIONAL71.34-EXISTING NATIVE HABITAT PRESERVE1.66TOTAL73.00OSCEOLA TRAIL LIVINGSTON RDPINE RIDGE ROAD 9.A.2.ePacket Pg. 554Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of LLN ESW0100200 400SCALE IN FEETTurrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@thanaples.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\21074.00 community school spoon parcel\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\21074-COUNTY-PUD.dwg IMPACTS MAP 5/19/2021THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY:CHANGED:SHEET NO.:RY NO. 5875MNRMJ05-19-2121074.00-1225COMMUNITY SCHOOL OF NAPLESIMPACTS MAP49-------------------05 OF 08·SURVEY COURTESY OF:··SURVEY DATED:NOTES:·THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY ANDARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE."RWA, INC."03-08-21NATIVE HABITAT UPLANDVEGETATION IMPACTS (SQ FT)28,713 (0.66 AC)SUBJECTPROPERTYPROPERTYBOUNDARYSITEPLANPROVIDED BYRWA, INC.NATIVE HABITAT UPLANDVEGETATION IMPACTSEXISTING NATIVE HABITATPRESERVE 1.66 AC9.A.2.ePacket Pg. 555Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of COMMUNITY SCHOOL OF NAPLES BIG CYPRESS FOX SQUIRREL SPECIES MANAGEMENT PLAN MAY 2021 PREPARED BY: TURRELL, HALL & ASSOCIATES, INC. 3584 EXCHANGE AVENUE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 643-0166 marielle@thanaples.com 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 556 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) Big Cypress Fox Squirrel Species Management Plan Community School of Naples 2 1.0 INTRODUCTION This report provides project management guidelines for the maintenance of transient and foraging habitat for the Big Cypress fox squirrel (Sciurus niger avicennia). This document includes information on the Big Cypress fox squirrel’s ecological and biological characteristics as well as habitat requirements. A description of how planning and site development has been guided in consideration of the snakes is given as well as the management plan. The plan briefly describes habitat that will be available and other relevant information. 2.0 PROJECT LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION The Community School of Naples property is approximately 73± acres in size, located at 13275 Livingston Road approximately 0.13 miles north of Pine Ridge Road. The property is situated within Section 12, Township 49 South, Range 25 East, Collier, County, Florida. Access to school grounds occurs via a security gate just south of Osceola Trail or an entrance north of Pine Ridge Road situated between Cypress Glen Condominiums and the Sports Camp. The additional Spoon Parcel, which is proposed for partial construction onsite, lies on the southwestern-most side of the site and is best accessed via a gated pathway off Osceola Trail along the west side of the main campus and athletic fields. The applicant will be adding and developing 0.66 acres of a 3.95-acre parcel that was designated as “future phase” in earlier permits, making the total site size 77± acres. In addition to the new acreage, some features on the west campus will be added/changed. Proposed campus changes include a basketball court, a turf field, new lower school dining facility, new dumpster facility, and a relocated play area. The Spoon Parcel, which is currently wooded, would be impacted to slightly expand parking for the west school campus. 3.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS AND HABTIAT DESCRIPTIONS Vegetative communities of the newly added Spoon Parcel include upland palmetto/pine habitat and disturbed (filled) lands, as well as some laurel oak wetland and pine, cypress, cabbage palm wetland. The existing habitat types (based on FLUCFCS codes) are shown below. FLUCFCS Acreage WETLANDS Pine, Cypress, Cabbage Palm/Wetland Hardwood (15% Exotic) 624/610 E1 0.29 Mixed Wetland Hardwood 617 0.40 Total Wetland Habitat 0.69 UPLANDS Palmetto Prairie/Pine Flatwood (25-60% Exotic) 321/411 E2 3.23 Disturbed Land 740 0.03 Total Upland Habitat 3.26 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 557 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) Big Cypress Fox Squirrel Species Management Plan Community School of Naples 3 The habitat proposed for impact at this time is the Palmetto Prairie/ Pine Flatwood (321/411 E2) which is dominated by saw palmetto (Serenoa repens), slash pine (Pinus elliottii), downy-rose myrtle (Rhodomyrtus tomentosa), ear-leaf acacia (Acacia auriculiformis) and cocoplum (Chrysobalanus icaco). Remaining habitat set aside for future use is the same habitat as is being impacted. Jurisdictional wetland areas are the very western extend of the ‘spoon’ and in the ‘handle’ of the parcel. The wetland habitat is not slated for development. 4.0 BIG CYPRESS FOX SQUIRREL Surveys have been conducted on the property and will continue up to construction. All surveys were conducted according to guidelines of the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC). No evidence of any fox squirrel utilization has been observed to-date, including foraging and nesting. Prior to any work commencing on the property, a pre- construction survey will be required to examine the staked clearing areas for evidence of Big Cypress fox squirrels and/or their nests. 4.1 Occurrence Onsite While no individuals of this state listed species were observed on site during the threatened and endangered species survey, the presence of suitable habitat allows the possibility that the site may be home to or part of the territory of the species. This management plan provides specific measures for species protection should an individual be located. 4.2 Biology Listed as a Threatened species by Florida Game and Freshwater Fish Commission in 1990, the Big Cypress fox squirrel is most commonly rusty orange or buff in color with a darker back. The head usually has a black crown and cheeks with a white muzzle and white ear tips. The total length of the animal from tip of nose to tip of tail is approximately 21 to 22 inches. Population Dynamics Big Cypress fox squirrels have two distinct breeding seasons. The first runs from May through August and the second from November through January. Although there are two (2) seasons, the females produce only one (1) litter per year. Litters can contain from 1 to 8 young. The young start leaving the nests in September and March. Species/Critical Habitat Description Big Cypress fox squirrels usually occur in pine flatwood or mixed pine and cypress communities. They are not as closely associated with oaks as some other squirrel species. They construct platform nests in trees that are composed of leaves, grass, Spanish moss, stripped pieces of bark, and other suitable materials. The nests of gray squirrels are very similar in appearance and are usually indistinguishable from fox squirrel nests. 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 558 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) Big Cypress Fox Squirrel Species Management Plan Community School of Naples 4 The preferred food for these squirrels seems to be slash pine seeds. They will also eat cypress seeds, cabbage and queen palm fruits, bromeliad buds, acorns, fungi, and many other fruits. The main threat to population stability is through habitat loss. Large scale commercial and residential projects have reduced the subspecies’ range. The latest topic of concern is the isolation of fox squirrel golf course populations. Open lands which were serving as corridors between golf course populations have now been developed thus completely isolating the small populations. 5.0 SITE DEVELOPMENT CONSIDERATIONS & SPECIES MANAGEMENT PROTOCOL Habitat management for undeveloped areas, other than the palmetto habitat, will be based on maintaining the already open midstory that is preferred by the fox squirrels. Initial exotic eradication efforts will also be conducted in all habitats to remove invasive, exotic plant species. After the exotic vegetation is eradicated, perpetual maintenance will be conducted until such time the final site plan for upland impacts is proposed for permitting. Periodic thinning of native vegetation may occur within the preserve to enhance habitat conditions for potential fox squirrel populations. Prior to commencement of work onsite, fencing and containment surrounding the proposed impact areas will be installed to ensure that machinery is kept within the authorized development footprint area. Currently there are no fox squirrel nests that would be impacted by the proposed construction, however a pre-construction survey will occur to verify that none have nested in between surveys. Educational information and signage will be in place to inform construction crews, students, and faculty of the rules to avoid adverse interactions with on-site wildlife, including fox squirrels. Prior to clearing or construction, the following activities will take place.  Immediately prior to the construction on any phase of development, the areas will be surveyed for the presence of Big Cypress Fox Squirrel nests. If no active nests are found, the lands can be cleared. If active nests are found, buffers will be maintained around the nest trees until the nests are deemed inactive. The buffers are anticipated to be a minimum of 150 feet in width but may be increased if it is felt necessary to provide suitable foraging area.  Construction personnel will be briefed on fox squirrels and given appropriate directives, the attached handout and contact information should any squirrels be observed during the construction activities. 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 559 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) INTRODUCTION The Big Cypress Fox Squirrel (Sciurus niger avicennia) is a relatively large squirrel that occurs locally. It is generally found in open pine and pine/cypress habitats south of the Caloosahatchee River and west of the Everglades. This small distribution in conjunction with habitat fragmentation and development precipitated a population decline that led the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC) to list the species as threatened and establish management guidelines for its protection. The Paseo property contains habitat that is suitable for Big Cypress fox squirrels and these squirrels have been documented within the adjacent Six Mile Cypress Slough Preserve. Common gray squirrels are also found on and adjacent to the property. This document has been produced to educate residents of, and visitors to, the Paseo development about the Big Cypress fox squirrel. It describes the squirrel’s habits and needs and explains what to do if you should encounter one. BIOLOGY Physical Description: The Big Cypress fox squirrel is usually rusty orange or buff in color with a darker back. The head usually has a black crown and cheeks with a white muzzle and white ears or ear tips. The total length of the animal from tip of nose to tip of tail is around 21 or 22 inches. Habitat: Big Cypress fox squirrels usually occur slash pine flatwoods or mixed pine and cypress communities. They are not as closely associated with oaks as some other squirrel species. They construct platform nests in trees that are composed of leaves, grass, Spanish moss, stripped pieces of bark, and other suitable materials. The nests of gray squirrels are very similar in appearance and are usually indistinguishable from fox squirrel nests. Reproduction: Big Cypress fox squirrels have two distinct breeding seasons. The first runs from May through August and the second from November through January. Although there are two seasons, the females produce only one litter per year. Litters can contain from 1 to 8 young. The young start leaving the nests in September and March. Forage: The preferred food for these squirrels seems to be slash pine seeds. They will also eat cypress seeds, cabbage and queen palm fruits, bromeliad buds, acorns, fungi, and many other fruits. NOTICE TO SCHOOL Big Cypress fox squirrels occur on and adjacent to the Paseo Development property. This species has been well documented co-existing with low-impact types of development including residential and golf course projects. In order to accommodate and minimize the potential to impact this protected species, certain restrictions and covenants have been established within the community. Sales documents will include language requiring that pets (dogs and cats) be restrained on leashes when outside. This species of squirrel spends a large amount of its time on or near the ground and is usually not too afraid of people. As a result, unrestrained pets can severely impact or even eradicate a local fox squirrel population. Residents should be aware of the posted speed restriction on the roadways and should be on the lookout for squirrels along the project’s internal roads. Residents with bird feeders should use squirrel restrictors if they do not desire to feed the squirrels. It is illegal to harm, harass, or kill Big Cypress fox squirrels so extermination techniques are not a viable option to deal with squirrels in the feeders. 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 560 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Gray Squirrel Big Cypress Fox Squirrel PROTECTION The Big Cypress fox squirrel is protected under the Florida Endangered Species Act of 1977 (FL Statute 372.072). There are criminal and civil penalties for injuring, harming, harassing, or killing this species. Questions regarding fox squirrel management as well as the responses to interactions with fox squirrels should be directed to: Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission Office of Environmental Services (239) 338-2550 ext. 216 IDENTIFICATION and PROTECTION of the BIG CYPRESS FOX SQUIRREL 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 561 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of STATE OF FLORIDACOUNTY AERIAL VICINITY MAPSTATE OF FLORIDACOUNTY AERIAL VICINITY MAPNOTES:<> THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SUBJECTPROPERTYSUBJECTPROPERTY<> LATITUDE:N 26.219004<> LONGITUDE:W -81.754284SITE ADDRESS:<> 13275 LIVINGSTON RD NAPLES, FL 34109Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@thanaples.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\21074.00 community school spoon parcel\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\21074-COUNTY-PUD.dwg LOCATION MAP 5/19/2021THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY:CHANGED:SHEET NO.:RY NO. 5875MNRMJ05-19-2121074.00-1225COMMUNITY SCHOOL OF NAPLESLOCATION MAP49-------------------01 OF 08COLLIER COUNTYCOLLIER COUNTYGULF OF MEXICOGULF OF MEXICO8588288641MARCOISLANDEVERGLADESCITY9329846NAPLES90908399483783784129292983983992887846951862I-758486431856850846890896NESWKEY WESTTAMPAFT.MYERSMIAMINAPLESSUBJECTPROPERTY9.A.2.ePacket Pg. 562Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of N E S W0 200 400800SCALE IN FEETTurrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@thanaples.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\21074.00 community school spoon parcel\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\21074-COUNTY-PUD.dwg FLUCFCS MAP 5/19/2021THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY: CHANGED:SHEET NO.:RY NO. 5875MNRMJ05-19-2121074.00-1225COMMUNITY SCHOOL OF NAPLESFLUCFCS MAP49-------------------03 OF 08UPLAND (ACRES):WETLAND (ACRES):PROJECT (ACRES):3.953.260.69·SURVEY COURTESY OF:··SURVEY DATED:NOTES:·THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY ANDARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE."RWA, INC."03-08-21SUBJECT PROPERTY(SPOON PARCEL)740617624/610E1624/610E1624/610E1321/411E2SPOON PARCELFLUCFCSDESCRIPTIONAREA(AC)321/411E2PALMETTO PRAIRIES/PINE FLATWOODSEXOTICS 25-60%3.23617MIXED WETLAND HARDWOODS0.40624/610E1CYPRESS - PINE - CABBAGE PALM/WETLAND HARDWOOD FORESTSEXOTICS 0-25%0.29740DISTURBED LAND0.03TOTAL3.95PROPERTY BOUNDARY(MAIN PARCEL)170EXISTINGNATIVEHABITATMAIN PARCELFLUCFCSDESCRIPTIONAREA(AC)170INSTITUTIONAL71.34-EXISTING NATIVE HABITAT PRESERVE1.66TOTAL73.00OSCEOLA TRAIL LIVINGSTON RDPINE RIDGE ROAD 9.A.2.ePacket Pg. 563Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of LLN ESW0100200 400SCALE IN FEETTurrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@thanaples.com3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\21074.00 community school spoon parcel\CAD\PERMIT-COUNTY\21074-COUNTY-PUD.dwg IMPACTS MAP 5/19/2021THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY:CHANGED:SHEET NO.:RY NO. 5875MNRMJ05-19-2121074.00-1225COMMUNITY SCHOOL OF NAPLESIMPACTS MAP49-------------------05 OF 08·SURVEY COURTESY OF:··SURVEY DATED:NOTES:·THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY ANDARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE."RWA, INC."03-08-21NATIVE HABITAT UPLANDVEGETATION IMPACTS (SQ FT)28,713 (0.66 AC)SUBJECTPROPERTYPROPERTYBOUNDARYSITEPLANPROVIDED BYRWA, INC.NATIVE HABITAT UPLANDVEGETATION IMPACTSEXISTING NATIVE HABITATPRESERVE 1.66 AC9.A.2.ePacket Pg. 564Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Page 1 6610 Willow Park Drive Suite 200 Naples, FL 34109 | (239) 597-0575 | Fax (239) 597-0578 www.consult-rwa.com K:\2009\090288.00.29 CSN - Service Rd Alignment & Spoon Parcel\03 PUDA Application Preparation\Working Documents\QA -QC Review\14 Letter of No Impact TIS Waiver Request.docx May 20, 2021 Mr. Michael Sawyer, Principal Planner Growth Management Department Transportation Planning 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Subject: Community School of Naples Amendment to PUD (PUDA)– Submittal #1 Letter of No Impact TIS Waiver Request - PL20210000731 Dear Mr. Sawyer: Per the Pre-Application Meeting Notes from 04/14/2021 and an email from you dated April 16, 2021, on behalf of our client, we are requesting a No Impact TIS Waiver. This waiver request is based on no additional trips-transportation impact with the proposed changes. We look forward to your review and should you have any questions or need additional information please do not hesitate to let me know. Sincerely, RWA, Inc. Kenrick S. Gallander, AICP Director of Planning cc: Mr. Paul Selvidio Mr. Richard Yovanovich, Esq. RWA File: 090288.00.29 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 565 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) Words underlined are additions; Words struck through are deletions Community School of Naples PL 20210000731 7/21/2021 Page 1 of 14 EXHIBIT A PROJECT LAND USE TRACTS TRACT LAND USE ACREAGE TRACT “CF” COMMUNITY FACILITY 71.34 75.34 TRACT “P” PRESERVE 1.66 TOTAL ACREAGE 73.00 77.00 I TRACT CF PERMITTED USES: No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or in part, for other than the following: A. Principal Uses: 1) Child care centers; 2) Civic and cultural facilities; 3) Museums; 4) Parks and playgrounds, noncommercial recreation facilities, open space uses; 5) Schools, private and parochial schools. This includes Educational Plants for public schools; 6) Social and fraternal organizations; 7) Educational services (groups 8211—8231); 8) Any other principal use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing list of permitted principal uses, as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals (“BZA”) by the process outlined in the Land Development Code (LDC). B. Accessory Uses: Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with the permitted principal uses and structures, including, but not limited to: 1) Customary accessory uses and structures associated with schools including but not limited to: administrative offices; theaters; auditoriums; pavilions; gymnasiums; residence halls; swimming pools with or without screened enclosures; aquatic centers; ball fields, with or without grandstands/stadium seating; press boxes; practice fields; track and field facilities and field houses, tennis courts, athletic equipment and general storage buildings, and other indoor or outdoor recreation facilities, maintenance and landscape storage; 2) Security gatehouses; 3) Polling place if deemed warranted by the Supervisor of Elections. 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 566 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) Words underlined are additions; Words struck through are deletions Community School of Naples PL 20210000731 7/21/2021 Page 2 of 14 4) Water management structures in accordance with Collier County, SFWMD, DEP, and USACOE permitting requirements. II TRACT P PERMITTED USES: No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or in part, for other than the following: A. Principal Uses: 1) Upland preserves; 2). Wetland preserves. B Accessory Uses and Structures: Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with the permitted principal uses and structures, including, but not limited to: 1. Boardwalks, nature trails, shelters, viewing platforms, educational signs, and information kiosks; 2. Water management structures in accordance with Collier County, SFWMD, DEP, and USACOE permitting requirements; Reference Executive Office of the President, Office of Management and Budget, Standard Industrial Classification Manual, 1987 Edition 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 567 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) Words underlined are additions; Words struck through are deletions Community School of Naples PL 20210000731 7/21/2021 Page 3 of 14 EXHIBIT B DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS GENERAL: Development of Community School of Naples CFPUD shall be in accordance with the contents of this Ordinance and applicable sections of the Collier County LDC and Growth Management Plan (GMP) in effect at the time of issuance of any development order, such as, but not limited to, subdivision plat, site development plan, excavation permit, and preliminary work authorization, to which such regulations relate. Where these regulations fail to provide developmental standards, then the provisions of the most similar district in the LDC shall apply. Except as provided for herein, all criteria set forth below shall be understood to be in relation to individual parcel or lot boundary lines, or between structures. Table I below sets forth the development standards for land uses within the CFPUD Community Facility Subdistrict (Tract “CF”). Standards not specifically set forth herein shall be those specified in applicable sections of the LDC in effect as of the date of approval of the SDP or Subdivision plat. 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 568 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) Words underlined are additions; Words struck through are deletions Community School of Naples PL 20210000731 7/21/2021 Page 4 of 14 TABLE I COMMUNITY FACILITY DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS COMMUNITY FACILITIES PRINCIPAL STRUCTURES MINIMUM LOT AREA 10,000 S.F. MINIMUM LOT WIDTH (LINEAR FEET) 80 FEET MINIMUM FLOOR AREA 1,000 S.F (GROUND FLOOR) MIN FRONT YARD 25 FEET MIN SIDE YARD 15 FEET MIN REAR YARD 15 FEET MIN PRESERVE SETBACK 25 FEET MIN. DISTANCE BETWEEN STRUCTURES ½ SUM OF BUILDING HEIGHTS MINIMUM 25 FEET ZONED - MAX. BUILDING HEIGHT (NOT TO EXCEED) 45 FEET* ACCESSORY STRUCTURES FRONT S.P.S. SIDE S.P.S. REAR S.P.S. PRESERVE SETBACK 10 FEET MINIMUM DISTANCE BETWEEN STRUCTURES 10 FEET ZONED - MAX. BUILDING HEIGHT (NOT TO EXCEED) S.P.S. S.P.S. = Same as Principal Structures *Actual height: 71 feet (Existing LMA building) 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 569 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) Words underlined are additions; Words struck through are deletions Community School of Naples PL 20210000731 7/21/2021 Page 5 of 14 EXHIBIT C MASTER PLAN 9.A.2.ePacket Pg. 570Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of EXISTING LAKE RSF-3 NAPLES PROGRESSIVE GYMNASTICS CAMP PUD ST NON ST L L CF CF A, AGRICULTURE CU CF A, AGRICULTURE CU A, AGRICULTURE THE EXISTING PRESERVE SATISFIES LANDSCAPING & BUFFER REQUIREMENTS 4 L ACTIVITY CENTER FIELD HOUSE NORRIS POOL EXISTING PRESERVE (1.66 AC) AQUATIC CENTER MEDIA CENTER SCIENCE BLDG PU BARRON COLLIER HIGH SCHOOL CYPRESS GLEN CU P STUDENT ACTIVITY CENTER LOWER SCHOOL FUTURE FACILITY DEVELOPMENT AREA LOWER SCHOOL DINING FACILITY CF PLAYGROUND AREA SERVICE FACILITY AREA LAND USE SUMMARY TRACT LAND USE ACREAGE TRACT "CF"COMMUNITY FACILITY 75.34 TRACT "P"PRESERVE 1.66 TOTAL 77.00 6610 Willow Park Drive, Suite 200Naples, Florida 34109(239) 597-0575 FAX: (239) 597-0578www.consult-rwa.comFlorida Certificates of AuthorizationEB 7663 LB 6952 P CF L X ST CFPUD MASTER PLAN NOTES 1 PRESERVE REQUIREMENT PRESERVE REQUIREMENT REQUIRED PRESERVE PRESERVE PROVIDED 15% OF EXISTING NATIVE VEGETATION (5.58 ACRES)0.84 ACRES 1.66 ACRES 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 571 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) RPUD X L LCF CF L 1 2 1 2 3EXISTI N G T R A C K AND FI E L D PRESS BOX BASEBALL FIELD SOFTBALL FIELD TENNIS COURTS PRACTICE FIELD MANCHESTER SQUARE ATHLETIC FIELD MAINTENANCE BUILDING PERFORMANCE CENTER BEACH VOLLEYBALL COURTS 6610 Willow Park Drive, Suite 200Naples, Florida 34109(239) 597-0575 FAX: (239) 597-0578www.consult-rwa.comFlorida Certificates of AuthorizationEB 7663 LB 6952 P CF L X ST 1 ” 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 572 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) Words underlined are additions; Words struck through are deletions Community School of Naples PL 20210000731 7/21/2021 Page 8 of 14 EXHIBIT D Legal Description (Preliminary legal, pending title work) A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN THE EAST ONE-QUARTER (1/4) OF SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTH QUARTER CORNER OF SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. THENCE ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST ONE- QUARTER (1/4) OF SAID SECTION 12, S89°30'40"E FOR 1386.36 FEET; THENCE ALONG THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST ONE-QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 12, THE FOLLOWING SIX (6) DESCRIBED COURSES: 1) THENCE N00°05'00"W FOR 75.00 FEET, TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF PARCEL 106 (FEE SIMPLE) AS DESCRIBED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 2952, PAGE 1616 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; 2) THENCE ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID PARCEL 106, N00°05'00"W FOR 10.00 FEET, TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE PARCEL DESCRIBED HEREIN; 3) THENCE N00°05'00"W FOR 1235.06 FEET; 4) THENCE N00°05'25"W FOR 1015.36 FEET; 5) THENCE N00°10'26"W FOR 304.90 FEET 6) THENCE N00°29'43"W FOR 1219.68 FEET, TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY OF OSCEOLA TRAIL (SHOWN ON SKETCH AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION PREPARED BY HOLE MONTES DATED 9/01 PROJECT NUMBER 1998149, DRAWING NUMBER B-3404); THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID OSCEOLA TRAIL, THE FOLLOWING TWO (2) DESCRIBED COURSES: 1) THENCE S89°33'47"E FOR 200.20 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENTIAL CURVE; 2) THENCE 172.82 FEET ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 285.00 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 34°44'38", AND WHOSE LONG CHORD BEARS S72°11'29"E FOR A DISTANCE OF 170.19 FEET, TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON-TANGENTIAL CURVE, ALSO BEING A POINT ON THE BOUNDARY OF A LAKE PARCEL DESCRIBED BY HOLE MONTES DATED 2/03, PROJECT NUMBER 03.515, DRAWING NUMBER B-4162; THENCE ALONG SAID LAKE PARCEL BOUNDARY, THE FOLLOWING NINE (9) DESCRIBED COURSES: 1) THENCE 7.88 FEET ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 45.00 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 10°01'58", AND WHOSE LONG CHORD BEARS S80°03'03"W FOR A DISTANCE OF 7.87 FEET; 2) THENCE S36°05'39"W FOR 106.66 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON-TANGENTIAL CURVE; 3) THENCE 34.38 FEET ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 45.00 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 43°46'27", AND WHOSE LONG CHORD BEARS S24°44'14"E FOR A DISTANCE OF 33.55 FEET, TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON-TANGENTIAL CURVE; 4) THENCE 36.47 FEET ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 155.04 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 13°28'45", AND WHOSE LONG CHORD BEARS S39°53'07"E FOR A DISTANCE OF 36.39 FEET, TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON-TANGENTIAL CURVE; 5) THENCE 71.28 FEET ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 120.00 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 34°02'07", AND WHOSE LONG CHORD BEARS S50°36'17"E FOR A DISTANCE OF 70.24 FEET; 6) THENCE S67°37'21"E FOR 62.82 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENTIAL CURVE; 7) THENCE 59.78 FEET ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 120.00 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 28°32'28", AND WHOSE LONG CHORD BEARS S81°53'39"E FOR A DISTANCE OF 59.16 FEET; 8) THENCE N83°50'03"E FOR 23.32 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENTIAL CURVE; 9) THENCE 54.37 FEET ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 35.00 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 89°00'31", AND WHOSE LONG CHORD BEARS N39°19'12"E FOR A DISTANCE OF 49.07 FEET, TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON-TANGENTIAL CURVE, ALSO BEING A POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID OSCEOLA TRAIL; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID OSCEOLA TRAIL, THE FOLLOWING TWO (2) DESCRIBED COURSES: 1) THENCE 244.65 FEET ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 385.00 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 36°24'34", AND WHOSE LONG CHORD BEARS S71°21'30"E FOR A DISTANCE OF 240.56 FEET; 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 573 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) Words underlined are additions; Words struck through are deletions Community School of Naples PL 20210000731 7/21/2021 Page 9 of 14 2) THENCE S89°33'47"E FOR 306.64 FEET, TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE WESTERLY RIGHT -OF- WAY LINE OF LIVINGSTON ROAD (COUNTY ROAD 881, AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS FOR COUNTY PROJECT NUMBER 62071 DATE STAMPED 7/16/02 @ 12:29:34 PM); THENCE ALONG THE WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SAID LIVINGSTON ROAD, THE FOLLOWING FOUR (4) DESCRIBED COURSES: 1) THENCE S00°50'38"E FOR 134.04 FEET; 2) THENCE N89°10'59"E FOR 10.00 FEET; 3) THENCE S00°50'38"E FOR 783.66 FEET TO A BREAK POINT AS OFFSET FROM THE EAST LINE OF SECTION 12; 4) THENCE S00°17'36"E FOR 1316.08 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID LIVINGSTON ROAD WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY, N89°30'32"W FOR 235.06 FEET, TO A POINT ON THE WESTERLY BOUNDARY OF FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY UTILITY EASEMENTS AS DESCRIBED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 162, PAGE 211 AND OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 429, PAGE 356 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AND AS SHOWN IN ROAD BOOK 2, PAGE 98-101 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE ALONG THE WESTERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID EASEMENTS, S00°17'18"E FOR 521.25 FEET; THENCE N89°31'12"W FOR 181.55 FEET; THENCE S00°10'47"E FOR 139.04 FEET, TO A POINT ON THE MONUMENTED NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH HALF (1/2) OF THE SOUTHEAST ONE-QUARTER (1/4) OF THE SOUTHEAST ONE-QUARTER (1/4) OF SAID SECTION 12; THENCE ALONG SAID MONUMENTED NORTH LINE, N89°31'23"W FOR 591.69 FEET, TO A POINT ON THE MONUMENTED EAST LINE OF THE WEST 100 FEET OF THE EAST ONE-QUARTER (1/4) OF SAID SECTION 12; THENCE ALONG SAID MONUMENTED EAST LINE OF THE WEST 100 FEET OF THE EAST ONE - QUARTER (1/4), S00°05'41"E FOR 575.60 FEET, TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID PARCEL 106; THENCE ALONG THE NORTHERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID PARCEL 106, N89°21'57"W FOR 99.95 FEET, TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE PARCEL HEREIN DESCRIBED. CONTAINING 3,181,994.68 SQUARE FEET OR 73.0 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS AND RESTRICTIONS OF RECORD. A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTH QUARTER (1/4) CORNER OF SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE S89°30'40"E FOR 1386.36 FEET ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (1/4) OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) OF SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) OF SAID SECTION 12; THENCE N00°05'00"W FOR 85.00 FEET ALONG THE WEST LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) OF SECTION 12, TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE ORDER OF TAKING DESCRIBED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 2660, PAGE 3356 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, ALSO BEING THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE PARCEL DESCRIBED HEREIN; THENCE CONTINUE ALONG THE WEST LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) OF SECTION 12, N00°05'00"W FOR 1235.06 FEET, TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) OF SAID SECTION 12; THENCE N00°05'25”W FOR 1015.36 FEET ALONG THE WEST LINE OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) OF SECTION 12; THENCE N00°10'26"W FOR 304.90 FEET, TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) OF SAID SECTION 12; THENCE N00°29'43"W FOR 1219.68 FEET ALONG THE WEST LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) OF SAID SECTION 12, TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 574 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) Words underlined are additions; Words struck through are deletions Community School of Naples PL 20210000731 7/21/2021 Page 10 of 14 BOUNDARY OF A 100 FOOT WIDE PUBLIC SCHOOL ACCESS DRIVE, ALSO KNOWN AS OSCEOLA TRAIL; THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY OF OSCEOLA TRAIL, THE FOLLOWING TWO (2) DESCRIBED COURSES: 1) THENCE S89°33'47"E FOR 200.20 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENTIAL CURVE; 2) THENCE 172.82 FEET ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 285.00 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 34°44'37", AND WHOSE LONG CHORD BEARS S72°11'28"E FOR A DISTANCE OF 170.19 FEET, TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON-TANGENTIAL CURVE; THENCE LEAVING SAID SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY OF OSCEOLA TRAIL FOR THE FOLLOWING NINE (9) DESCRIBED COURSES: 1) THENCE 7.88 FEET ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 45.00 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 10°01'58", AND WHOSE LONG CHORD BEARS S80°03'03"W FOR A DISTANCE OF 7.87 FEET; 2) THENCE S36°05'39"W FOR 106.66 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON-TANGENTIAL CURVE; 3) THENCE 34.38 FEET ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 45.00 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 43°46'28", AND WHOSE LONG CHORD BEARS S24°44'15"E FOR A DISTANCE OF 33.55 FEET, TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON-TANGENTIAL CURVE; 4) THENCE 36.47 FEET ALONG A CURVE TO THE RIGHT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 155.04 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 13°28'44", AND WHOSE LONG CHORD BEARS S39°53'07"E FOR A DISTANCE OF 36.39 FEET, TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON-TANGENTIAL CURVE; 5) THENCE 71.28 FEET ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 120.00 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 34°02'08", AND WHOSE LONG CHORD BEARS S50°36'17"E FOR A DISTANCE OF 70.24 FEET; 6) THENCE S67°37'21"E FOR 62.82 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENTIAL CURVE; 7) THENCE 59.78 FEET ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 120.00 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 28°32'32", AND WHOSE LONG CHORD BEARS S81°53'37"E FOR A DISTANCE OF 59.16 FEET; 8) THENCE N83°50'03"E FOR 23.32 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENTIAL CURVE; 9) THENCE 54.37 FEET ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 35.00 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 89°00'31", AND WHOSE LONG CHORD BEARS N39°19'12"E FOR A DISTANCE OF 49.07 FEET, TO THE BEGINNING OF A NON-TANGENTIAL CURVE, ALSO BEING A POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID OSCEOLA TRAIL; THENCE THE FOLLOWING TWO (2) DESCRIBED COURSES ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID OSCEOLA TRAIL: 1) THENCE 244.65 FEET ALONG A CURVE TO THE LEFT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 385.00 FEET, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 36°24'34", AND WHOSE LONG CHORD BEARS S71°21'30"E FOR A DISTANCE OF 240.56 FEET; 2) THENCE S89°33'47"E FOR 306.64 FEET, TO A POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH THE WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF LIVINGSTON ROAD (COUNTY ROAD 881); AS SHOWN ON THE ROADWAY PLANS, COUNTY PROJECT NO. 62071; THENCE ALONG SAID WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF LIVINGSTON ROAD, THE FOLLOWING FOUR (4) DESCRIBED COURSES: 1) THENCE S00°50'38"E FOR 134.04 FEET; 2) THENCE N89°10'59"E FOR 10.00 FEET; 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 575 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) Words underlined are additions; Words struck through are deletions Community School of Naples PL 20210000731 7/21/2021 Page 11 of 14 3) THENCE S00°50'38"E FOR 783.66 FEET, TO A BREAK POINT IN SAID WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF LIVINGSTON ROAD, AS OFFSET FROM THE EASTERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID SECTION 12; 4) THENCE S00°17'36"E FOR 1316.08 FEET, TO A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) OF SAID SECTION 12; THENCE N89°30'32"W FOR 235.06 FEET ALONG SAID NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) OF SAID SECTION 12, TO A POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH THE WESTERLY BOUNDARY OF THE EAST 510 FEET OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) OF SAID SECTION 12; THENCE S00°17'18"E FOR 521.25 FEET ALONG SAID WESTERLY BOUNDARY OF THE EAST 510 FEET OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) OF SECTION 12; THENCE LEAVING SAID WESTERLY BOUNDARY OF THE EAST 510 FEET OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) OF SECTION 12, N89°31'12"W FOR 181.55 FEET; THENCE S00°10'47"E FOR 139.04 FEET, TO A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH HALF (1/2) OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) OF SAID SECTION 12; THENCE N89°31'23"W FOR 591.69 FEET ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH HALF (1/2) OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) OF SAID SECTION 12; THENCE LEAVING SAID NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH HALF (1/2) OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (1/4) OF SAID SECTION 12, S00°05'41"E FOR 575.60 FEET, TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE ORDER OF TAKING DESCRIBED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 2660, PAGE 3356 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE N89°21'57"W FOR 99.95 FEET, ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID ORDER OF TAKING, TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE PARCEL HEREIN DESCRIBED; CONTAINING 3,181,995 SQUARE FEET OR 73.0 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS AND RESTRICTIONS OF RECORD. TOGETHER WITH A TRACT OF LAND AS DESCRIBED IN OR. BOOK 4835, PAGE 1992, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORID A PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING MORE PARTICULARL Y DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCE AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE RUN N00°17'55"W ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 12, FOR A DISTANCE OF 1320.72 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 12, THENCE RUN N89°33'10"W ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH HALF OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 12, FOR A DISTANCE OF 1381.30 FEET, TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 12 AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE PARCEL OF LAND HEREIN DESCRIBED: THENCE N.89°33'10"W., ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 12, FOR A DISTANCE OF 392.33 FEET; THENCE RUN N.00°26'55"E., FOR A DISTANCE OF 12.01 FEET; THENCE RUN N.17°16'31"W., FOR A DISTANCE OF 26.91 FEET; THENCE RUN N.36°52'48"E., FOR A DISTANCE OF 28.14 FEET; THENCE RUN N.02°14'11"E., FOR A DISTANCE OF 37.24 FEET; 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 576 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) Words underlined are additions; Words struck through are deletions Community School of Naples PL 20210000731 7/21/2021 Page 12 of 14 THENCE RUN N.20°59'45"E., FOR A DISTANCE OF 55.86 FEET; THENCE RUN N.55°57'35"E., FOR A DISTANCE OF 32.58 FEET; THENCE RUN N.25°35'56"E., FOR A DISTANCE OF 38.53 FEET; THENCE RUN N.14°12'06"E., FOR A DISTANCE OF 30.40 FEET; THENCE RUN N.38°03'22"E., FOR A DISTANCE OF 56.97 FEET; THENCE RUN N.33°34'22"E., FOR A DISTANCE OF 39.53 FEET; THENCE RUN N.40°13'55"E., FOR A DISTANCE OF 35.17 FEET; THENCE RUN N.35°12'04"W., FOR A DISTANCE OF 28.99 FEET; THENCE RUN N.00°25'59"E., FOR A DISTANCE OF 25.97 FEET; THENCE RUN N.67°39'55"E., FOR A DISTANCE OF 17.60 FEET; THENCE RUN N.47°42'44"E., FOR A DISTANCE OF 47.16 FEET; THENCE RUN N.16°23'23"E., FOR A DISTANCE OF 26.84 FEET; THENCE RUN N.56°27'41"E., FOR A DISTANCE OF 41.75 FEET; THENCE RUN N.48°06'59"E., FOR A DISTANCE OF 18.71 FEET; THENCE RUN S.79°43'39"E., FOR A DISTANCE OF 10.31 FEET; THENCE RUN N.77°03'32"E., FOR A DISTANCE OF 26.10 FEET; THENCE RUN N.79°57'37"E., FOR A DISTANCE OF 52.16 FEET; THENCE RUN N.00°04'22"W., FOR 505.22 FEET TO A POINT ON A CIRCULAR CURVE; CONCAVE SOUTHERLY, WHOSE RADIUS POINT BEARS S.17°20'34"E., A DISTANCE OF 169.00 FEET THEREON, THENCE RUN EASTERLY, ALONG SAID ARC OF SAID CURVE TO THE RIGHT, HAVING A RADIUS OF 169.00 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 17°55'05" AND BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD OF 52.64 FEET AT A BEARING OF N.81°38'58"E., FOR A DISTANCE OF 52.85 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EAST LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 12; THENCE RUN S.00°05'53"E., ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 12, FOR A DISTANCE OF 1015.12 FEET, TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; CONTAINING 172,105.56 SQUARE FEET OR 3.951 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. THIS PROPERTY IS SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS, RESERVATIONS OR RESTRICTIONS OF RECORDS. BEARINGS REFER TO THE EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 49, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AS BEING N00°17'55"W. 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 577 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) Words underlined are additions; Words struck through are deletions Community School of Naples PL 20210000731 7/21/2021 Page 13 of 14 EXHIBIT E LIST OF REQUESTED DEVIATIONS FROM LDC Deviation #1 seeks relief from LDC Subsection 4.06.02.C.4., which requires a 20’ Type D buffer along all rights-of-way for projects of 15 acres or more, to allow a 15’ Type D buffer. Deviation #2 seeks relief from LDC Subsection 4.03.08(B)1., and Section 22-112 of the Code of Ordinances related to requirements for excavations, to allow the existing perimeter buffer to encroach into the lake maintenance easement area. Deviation #3 seeks relief from LDC Subsection 4.06.02.C.4., which requires a 20’ Type D buffer along all rights-of-way for projects of 15 acres or more, to allow for no buffer adjacent to the easternmost water management pond along Osceola Trail. Deviation #4 seeks relief from LDC Subsection 4.06.02.C.1., which requires a 10’ Type A buffer between CFPUD and AG zoning districts, to allow for no buffer along a short segment of the project boundary where the existing roadway abuts the boundary. 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 578 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) Words underlined are additions; Words struck through are deletions Community School of Naples PL 20210000731 7/21/2021 Page 14 of 14 EXHIBIT F LIST OF DEVELOPER COMMITMENTS The development of this CFPUD shall be subject to and governed by the following conditions: TRANSPORTATION Reserved PUD MONITORING One entity (hereinafter the Managing Entity) shall be responsible for PUD monitoring until close- out of the PUD, and this entity shall also be responsible for satisfying all PUD commitments until close-out of the PUD. At the time of this PUD approval, the Managing Entity is Community School of Naples, Inc., or its assigns. Should the Managing Entity desire to transfer the monitoring and commitments to a successor entity, then it must provide a copy of a legally binding document that needs to be approved for legal sufficiency by the County Attorney. After such approval, the Managing Entity will be released of its obligations upon written approval of the transfer by County staff, and the successor entity shall become the Managing Entity. As Owner and Developer sell off tracts, the Managing Entity shall provide written notice to County that includes an acknowledgement of the commitments required by the PUD by the new owner and the new owner’s agreement to comply with the Commitments through the Managing Entity, but the Managing Entity shall not be relieved of its responsibility under this Section. When the PUD is closed-out, then the Managing Entity is no longer responsible for the monitoring and fulfillment of PUD commitments. MISCELLANEOUS Issuance of a development permit by a county does not in any way create any rights on the part of the applicant to obtain a permit from a state or federal agency and does not create any liability on the part of the county for issuance of the permit if the applicant fails to obtain requisite approvals or fulfill the obligations imposed by a state or federal agency or undertakes actions that result in a violation of state or federal law.” (Section 125.022, FS) ENVIRONMENTAL Reserved PLANNING Reserved WATER MANAGEMENT Reserved 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 579 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) 9.A.2.ePacket Pg. 580Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) 9.A.2.ePacket Pg. 581Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) 9.A.2.ePacket Pg. 582Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) 9.A.2.ePacket Pg. 583Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) 9.A.2.ePacket Pg. 584Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) 9.A.2.ePacket Pg. 585Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 586 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of 9.A.2.ePacket Pg. 587Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) 9.A.2.ePacket Pg. 588Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) 9.A.2.ePacket Pg. 589Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) 9.A.2.ePacket Pg. 590Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) 9.A.2.ePacket Pg. 591Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) Community School of Naples Community Facilities Planned Unit Development (CFPUD) Amendment (PUDA –PL20210000731) Neighborhood Information Meeting July 14, 2021 5:30pm 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 592 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Team Representatives •Applicant/Owner: •Community School of Naples •Agent: •RWA, Inc. •Ken Gallander, AICP •Blake Finnegan •Joel Blikstad, P.E. 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 593 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 594 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Subject Property: •77.0+/-acres •Northwest of the intersection of Livingston Road and Pine Ridge Rd. •Existing Zoning District(s): CFPUD and RSF -3 •CFPUD •Approved in 2012 (Ord. No. 12-05) •Existing Use: School, private 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 595 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Request: •Approval of a Planned Unit Development Amendment (PUDA) to revise the overall CFPUD boundary. •Subject Property Consists of Two Zoning Districts: •Existing CFPUD: 73.0+/-acres •Existing RSF-3: 4.0+/-acres •RSF-3 portion to CFPUD •Proposed CFPUD: 77.00+/-acres •Consistent with subject property area 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 596 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 CFPUD RSF-3 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 597 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 CFPUD 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 598 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Request: •Permitted uses within the CFPUD •Tract Community Facility (CF) •No new Principal Uses being added that already permitted in the CFPUD per Ord. No. 12-05 •Adding to Accessory Uses: •“Water management structures in accordance with Collier County, SFWMD, DEP, and USACOE permitting requirements.” 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 599 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 600 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Process and Timeline: •Application under review with County Staff •Submittal #2 •Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) •Public Hearing (Estimated: October) •Board of County Commissioners (BCC) •Public Hearing (Estimated: November) 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 601 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Questions? 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 602 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 603 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) Page 1 6610 Willow Park Drive Suite 200 Naples, FL 34109 | (239) 597-0575 | Fax (239) 597-0578 www.consult-rwa.com K:\2020\200061.00.03 Sun Broadcasting PUD, ERP, PPL, SIP & SDP\0004 Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM)\Working Docs\NIM Mailer.docx March 29, 2021 Subject: Neighborhood Information Meeting Soluna RPUD Rezone Application (PL20210000093) Dear Property Owner: Please be advised that a formal application has been submitted to Collier County seeking approval of a request to rezone the property from Rural Agriculture (A) to Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD). The Soluna RPUD subject property is 18.21 ± acres and is located southwest of the intersection of Tree Farm Road and Massey Street in Section 35, Township 48 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. The Petitioner is asking the County to address the following: • Seek approval of a rezoning from Rural Agriculture (A) to Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) in order to allow for a future development of up to 130 residential dwelling units with an amenity center. In compliance with the Land Development Code requirements, a Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM) will be held to provide you an opportunity to become fully aware of our development intentions and to give you an opportunity to influence the form of development. The Neighborhood Information Meeting will be held at 5:30pm on Wednesday, April 21, 2021, at the Peace Lutheran Church, 9850 Immokalee Rd, Naples, FL 34120. Due to COVID-19, special accommodations will be made to allow people to attend in person or virt ually. The meeting will be held indoors where CDC guidelines will be observed. Reservations for in -person meeting attendance is required to ensure social distancing can be met. The meeting will also be online via Zoom. Should you choose to either participate in the Zoom meeting or want to attend in-person, please notify us via email at bfinnegan@consult-rwa.com prior to April 20, 2021, to allow us to send you login instructions and document your reservation. Should you have questions prior to the meeting, please also contact me via email at kgallander@consult-rwa.com or 239-597-0575. Sincerely, RWA, Inc. Kenrick S. Gallander, AICP Director of Planning KSG/ 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 604 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) Page 2 6610 Willow Park Drive Suite 200 Naples, FL 34109 | (239) 597-0575 | Fax (239) 597-0578 www.consult-rwa.com Project Location Map 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 605 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) 1NAME1 NAME2 NAME3 NAME4 NAME5 NAME6 FOLIO ADDRESSTYPEADAMUS, KIMBERLY JO 3574 CANOPY CIRCLENAPLES, FL 34120---025225001924 UALBERGO, JOSEPH MICHELLE MARIE ALBERGO 3396 PILOT CIRCLE NAPLES, FL 34120---081080004906 UAMENDOLA, NICHOLAS J CYNTHIA C AMENDOLA 3368 PILOT CIRCLE NAPLES, FL 34120---081080005044 UAPOSTOLIDIS, ATHANASIOS A CHRISTINA APOSTOLIDIS3597 CANOPY CIRCLE NAPLES, FL 34120---025225000585 UARBELAEZ, MONICA EMILIA VERONICA DEL PILAR RUIZ 3432 PILOT CIRNAPLES, FL 34120---081080004728 UARGO WARM SPRINGS LP 21141 BELLA TERRA BLVDESTERO, FL 33928---081080000243 UARGO WARM SPRINGS LP 21141 BELLA TERRA BLVDESTERO, FL 33928---081080000285 UARGO WARM SPRINGS LP 21141 BELLA TERRA BLVDESTERO, FL 33928---081080004029 UARGO WARM SPRINGS LP 21141 BELLA TERRA BLVDESTERO, FL 33928---081080004061 UARGO WARM SPRNGS LLLP 21141 BELLA TERRA BLVDESTERO, FL 33928---081080000023 UBALLESTEROS, JUAN C GRACE LUCIA CARTEI 3672 CANOPY CIR NAPLES, FL 34120---025225001665 UBAMMERLIN, RONALD & ELIZABETH 3680 CANOPY CIRNAPLES, FL 34210---025225001623 UBELL, JACKSON R & NANCY W 8538 GLENEAGLE WAYNAPLES, FL 34120---1683 79305009180 UBROWN, JAMES H & LORI D 3616 CANOPY CIRCLENAPLES, FL 34120---025225001801 UBROWN, ROBERT & DEIRDRE8637 GLENEAGLE WAYNAPLES, FL 34120---079305009889 UBUCCA, ANTONINO LORENA ELIZABETH BUCCA3308 PILOT CIRCLE NAPLES, FL 34120---081080001323 UBUCHANAN, DENNY L KIMBERLY S BUCHANAN3312 PILOT CIRCLE NAPLES, FL 34120---081080001307 UCALLAHAN III, CHARLES MICHAEL DONNA CALLAHAN3590 CANOPY CIR NAPLES, FL 34120---025225001843 UCALUSA PINE GOLF CLUB LLC 20 N WACKER DR STE 1711CHICAGO, IL 60606---054465001522 UCALUSA PINE GOLF CLUB LLC 20 N WACKER DR STE 1722CHICAGO, IL 60606---054465000125 UCALUSA PINE GOLF CLUB LLC 20 N WACKER DR STE 1722CHICAGO, IL 60606---054465000141 UCALUSA PINE GOLF CLUB LLC 20 N WACKER DR STE 1722CHICAGO, IL 60606---054465001182 UCALUSA PINE GOLF CLUB LLC 20 N WACKER DR STE 1722CHICAGO, IL 60606---054465001564 UCANOPY NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOC INC % SANDCASTLE MANAGEMENT 9150 GALLERIA COURT STE 201 NAPLES, FL 34109---025225000022 UCANOPY NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOC INC % SANDCASTLE MANAGEMENT 9150 GALLERIA COURT STE 201 NAPLES, FL 34109---025225000048 UCANOPY NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOC INC % SANDCASTLE MANAGEMENT 9150 GALLERIA COURT STE 201 NAPLES, FL 34109---025225000187 UCANOPY NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOC INC % SANDCASTLE MANAGEMENT 9150 GALLERIA COURT STE 201 NAPLES, FL 34109---025225000226 UCODY, DREW ALDEN & PERFAY 3356 PILOT CIRCLENAPLES, FL 34120---081080001080 UCOLLIER CNTY TRANSPORTATION RIGHT-OF-WAY 2885 HORSESHOE DRIVE S NAPLES, FL 34104---000193820003 UCOLLIER CNTY TRANSPORTATION RIGHT-OF-WAY 2885 HORSESHOE DRIVE S NAPLES, FL 34104---000209161708 UCOLLIER CNTY TRANSPORTATION RIGHT-OF-WAY 2885 HORSESHOE DRIVE S NAPLES, FL 34104---060410001325 UCONDOMINA JR, JORGE ARMANDO 3609 CANOPY CIRCLENAPLES, FL 34120---025225000640 UCONNER, STEVEN W & JILL G 3332 PILOT CIRCLENAPLES, FL 34120---081080001200 UCORRAO, DAVID J & TRISHA L 3307 PILOT CIRNAPLES, FL 34120---081080002021 UCRONENWETT TR, RICHARD H UTD 8/7/01 R H CRONENWETT REV LIVING 8610 GLENEAGLE WAY NAPLES, FL 34120---1685 79305009229 UCURRAN, TIMOTHY J KATHERINE K CURRAN3601 CANOPY CIR NAPLES, FL 34120---025225000608 UDABULLA, ALTIN & AMARILDA 3392 PILOT CIRNAPLES, FL 34120---081080004922 UDAVID & ELIZABETH YOUNG IRREVOCABLE TRUST 8633 GLENEAGLE WAY NAPLES, FL 34120---1686 79305009902 UDERVISHI, ASTRIT & ALBANA 3300 PILOT CIRCLENAPLES, FL 34120---081080001365 UDEVLIN, HAROLD B REGENE ROSS 8530 GLENEAGLE WAY NAPLES, FL 34120---1683 79305009148 UDONNELLS, JOSEPH W & SALLY A 3571 CANOPY CIRNAPLES, FL 34210---025225000462 UDUBE, ERIC & NICOLE C 3304 PILOT CIRCLENAPLES, FL 34120---081080001349 UDUNGAN, JAMES M & MARCIA N3637 SUNSET BLUFF DRBEAVERCREEK, OH 45430---079305009300 UDZIOBA, CHRISTINA LYNN3620 CANOPY CIRNAPLES, FL 34120---025225001788 UELWELL, BENJAMIN DAVID ALYSON RENEE ELWELL 3625 CANOPY CIR NAPLES, FL 34120---025225000721 UEVERETT, FAWNE ELICIA 3424 PILOT CIRCLENAPLES, FL 34120---081080004760 UFAUSTINI, JENNIFER LYNN FRANCESCO LUIGI A CASCONE 3412 PILOT CIRNAPLES, FL 34120---081080004825 UFIELDS II, CALVIN DAY EMILY S FIELDS 3372 PILOT CIRCLE NAPLES, FL 34120---081080005028 UFINNECY, JAMES & MARY ANN 8578 GLENEAGLE WAYNAPLES, FL 34120---1683 79305009384 UFRANCES A CAPASSO 2009 R/L TR 8602 GLENEAGLE WAYNAPLES, FL 34120---1685 79305009261 UFRAUMENI, JANINE MARIE 3594 CANOPY CIRNAPLES, FL 34120---025225001827 UFUSARO, NICHOLAS MAX BRIANNA MARIE FUSARO 3593 CANOPY CIR NAPLES, FL 34120---025225000569 UGASCON, JOEL N NICOLA LEE LA CORTE 3436 PILOT CIRNAPLES, FL 34120---081080004702 UGIRALDO, LUIS F CLAUDIA TERESA LUZARDO 3428 PILOT CIRNAPLES, FL 34120---081080004744 UGREEN, CAMERON RICHARD JACQUELINE MICHELE GREEN 3643 CANOPY CIRCLE NAPLES, FL 34120---025225000802 UGRIMES, SEAN M & STACY J 3634 CANOPY CIRNAPLES, FL 34120---025225001720 UGROSSMAN, ROBERT J GAIL J CRESSWELL 8582 GLENEAGLE WAY NAPLES, FL 34120---1683 79305009368 UGROW, JOHN & ANGELA 1001 WOODWIND HILL DRDALTON, PA 18414---9170 79305009164 UGUTIERREZ, JULIE ANN 3638 CANOPY CIRNAPLES, FL 34120---025225001704 UNotice: This data belongs to the Collier County Property Appraiser's Office (CCPA). Therefore, the recipient agrees not to represent this data to anyone as other than CCPA provided data. The recipient may not transfer this data to others without consent from the CCPA.Petition: PL20210000093(PUDZ) | Buffer: 500' | Date: 3/25/2021 | Site Location: 205280007 (Proposed Soluna RPUD)Copy of POList_500_PL202100000939.A.2.ePacket Pg. 606Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of 2HACZYNSKI, JEFFREY 3613 CANOPY CIRNAPLES, FL 34120---025225000666 UHANSEN, RICHARD C & JEAN A 8586 GLENEAGLE WAYNAPLES, FL 34120---1683 79305009342 UHARTZ, TERRY LEE & BRIAN IAN 3316 PILOT CIRCLENAPLES, FL 34120---081080001284 UHEATH, JAMES R & LINDA K 8526 GLENEAGLE WAYNAPLES, FL 34120---1683 79305009122 UHERRIN, DUSTIN ALLEN EMILY BRYN SPENCER 3400 PILOT CIRNAPLES, FL 34120---081080004883 UHOLMAN, DENISE L & MARTIN J 3344 PILOT CIRNAPLES, FL 34120---081080001145 UINGARGIOLA, GIUSEPPE ROSARIA INGARGIOLA 3647 CANOPY CIRCLE NAPLES, FL 34120---025225000828 UJOHN R LYDIC REVOCABLE TRUST BEVERLY K LYDIC REVOC TRUST PO BOX 367LAKE CITY, MI 49651---081080002089 UJURAS, ELEANOR MAE 3577 CANOPY CIRNAPLES, FL 34120---025225000488 UKELLY, CYNTHIA F 3639 CANOPY CIRCLENAPLES, FL 34120---025225000789 UKERRY A HOLLOWELL TRUST 3621 CANOPY CIRNAPLES, FL 34120---025225000705 UKHACHADOORIAN, RONALD & PAMELA 8606 GLENEAGLE WAYNAPLES, FL 34120---1685 79305009245 UKISTNER, JESSICA JEAN BRANDYN W KISTNER 3339 PILOT CIRNAPLES, FL 34120---081080002186 UKLEINHEINZ, CLARK V JULIE L OSTBY 3655 CANOPY CIR NAPLES, FL 34120---025225000860 UKNUTSON TR, GERALD J & LINDA J GERALD J KNUTSON REV/TR LINDA J KNUTSON REV/TR UTD 4/29/03 8522 GLENEAGLE WAY NAPLES, FL 34120---1683 79305009106 UKRACIK, CLAUDE J & BONNIE J 8562 GLENEAGLE WAYNAPLES, FL 34120---079305009465 UKROLL, ROBERT E & GRETCHEN A 315 CALAMUS CIRMEDINA, MN 55340---9228 79305009203 ULEE, KEITH ALEXIS HELENE LEE 3336 PILOT CIRCLE NAPLES, FL 34120---081080001187 ULENNOX III, GEORGE H DEBRA M BARNARD STECKLEIN8550 GLENEAGLE WAY NAPLES, FL 34120---1683 79305009520 ULEWIS, GERALD M & NATALIE B 8570 GLENEAGLE WAYNAPLES, FL 34120---1683 79305009423 ULICAUSI, MARIEL B 3617 CANOPY CIRNAPLES, FL 34120---025225000682 ULINLEY D METSGER REV/LIV TRUST 114 LA DOLCE VITA RDGREENSBURG, PA 15601---854279305009449 ULOWELL, LANDON CHASE GABRIELA D CARDENAS DUFFY 3676 CANOPY CIRCLE NAPLES, FL 34120---025225001649 ULYCETTE, PATRICIA M JAMIE M LYCETTE 3375 PILOT CIRNAPLES, FL 34120---081080005183 UMASHINGTON II, JOSEPH P ELENA M MASHINGTON 3630 CANOPY CIR NAPLES, FL 34120---025225001746 UMATTAMY NAPLES LLC 4901 VINELAND ROAD SUITE 450ORLANDO, FL 32811---081080002128 UMATTAMY NAPLES LLC 4901 VINELAND ROAD SUITE 450ORLANDO, FL 32811---081080002144 UMATTAMY NAPLES LLC 4901 VINELAND ROAD SUITE 450ORLANDO, FL 32811---081080002160 UMATTAMY NAPLES LLC 4901 VINELAND ROAD SUITE 450ORLANDO, FL 32811---081080002209 UMATTAMY NAPLES LLC 4901 VINELAND ROAD SUITE 450ORLANDO, FL 32811---081080002225 UMATTAMY NAPLES LLC 4901 VINELAND ROAD SUITE 450ORLANDO, FL 32811---081080002241 UMATTAMY NAPLES LLC 4901 VINELAND ROAD SUITE 450ORLANDO, FL 32811---081080002267 UMATTAMY TAMPA/SARASOTA LLC 4901 VINELAND RD SUITE 450ORLANDO, FL 32811---081080004663 UMATTAMY TAMPA/SARASOTA LLC 4901 VINELAND RD SUITE 450ORLANDO, FL 32811---081080004689 UMATTAMY TAMPA/SARASOTA LLC 4901 VINELAND RD SUITE 450ORLANDO, FL 32811---081080005206 UMATTAMY TAMPA/SARASOTA LLC 4901 VINELAND RD SUITE 450ORLANDO, FL 32811---081080005222 UMATTAMY TAMPA/SARASOTA LLC 4901 VINELAND RD SUITE 450ORLANDO, FL 32811---081080005248 UMATTAMY TAMPA/SARASOTA LLC 4901 VINELAND RD SUITE 450ORLANDO, FL 32811---081080005264 UMATTAMY TAMPA/SARASOTA LLC 4901 VINELAND RD SUITE 450ORLANDO, FL 32811---081080005280 UMATTAMY TAMPA/SARASOTA LLC 4901 VINELAND RD SUITE 450ORLANDO, FL 32811---081080005303 UMATTAMY TAMPA/SARASOTA LLC 4901 VINELAND RD SUITE 450ORLANDO, FL 32811---081080005329 UMATTAMY TAMPA/SARASOTA LLC 4901 VINELAND RD SUITE 450ORLANDO, FL 32811---081080005345 UMATTAMY TAMPA/SARASOTA LLC 4901 VINELAND RD SUITE 450ORLANDO, FL 32811---081080005361 UMATTAMY TAMPA/SARASOTA LLC 4901 VINELAND RD SUITE 450ORLANDO, FL 32811---081080005387 UMATTAMY TAMPA/SARASOTA LLC 4901 VINELAND RD SUITE 450ORLANDO, FL 32811---081080005400 UMATTAMY TAMPA/SARASOTA LLC 4901 VINELAND RD SUITE 450ORLANDO, FL 32811---081080005426 UMATTAMY TAMPA/SARASOTA LLC 4901 VINELAND RD SUITE 450ORLANDO, FL 32811---081080005442 UMATTAMY TAMPA/SARASOTA LLC 4901 VINELAND ROAD SUITE 450ORLANDO, FL 32811---081080004647 UMATTAMY TAMPA/SARASOTA LLC 4901 VINELAND ROAD SUITE 450ORLANDO, FL 32811---081080004809 UMATTAMY TAMPA/SARASOTA LLC 4901 VINELAND ROAD SUITE 450ORLANDO, FL 32811---081080004841 UMATTAMY TAMPA/SARASOTA LLC 4901 VINELAND ROAD STE 450ORLANDO, FL 32811---081080005109 UMATTAMY TAMPA/SARASOTA LLC 4901 VINELAND ROAD STE 450ORLANDO, FL 32811---081080005125 UMATTAMY TAMPA/SARASOTA LLC 4901 VINELAND ROAD STE 450ORLANDO, FL 32811---081080005141 UMATTAMY TAMPA/SARASOTA LLC 4901 VINELAND ROAD STE 450ORLANDO, FL 32811---081080005167 UMAUREN, EDWARD ARTHUR MARIA CAPONE MAUREN 3311 PILOT CIRNAPLES, FL 34120---081080002047 UMCCAIN, ALEX MICHAEL & BRYANNA 3323 PILOT CIRCLENAPLES, FL 34120---081080002102 UMCKENZIE, PATRICIA T 8598 GLENEAGLE WAYNAPLES, FL 34120---1683 79305009287 UMELHEIM, KIRA A & DAVE M 3635 CANOPY CIRNAPLES, FL 34120---025225000763 UMEYER, JOSEPH G 3328 PILOT CIRCLENAPLES, FL 34120---081080001226 UMOCKINGBIRD XING COMM ASSOC 9530 MARKETPLACE ROAD STE 206FT MYERS, FL 33912---060410000025 UMOCKINGBIRD XING COMM ASSOC 9530 MARKETPLACE ROAD STE 206FT MYERS, FL 33912---060410000041 UMOCKINGBIRD XING COMM ASSOC 9530 MARKETPLACE ROAD STE 206FT MYERS, FL 33912---060410001163 UMUELLER, JASON WILLIAM PAULINE ANN MUELLER 3388 PILOT CIRCLE NAPLES, FL 34120---081080004948 UMUTKA, JAMES R & DEBRA A 3585 CANOPY CIRNAPLES, FL 34120---025225000527 UNEWLOVE, RICHARD A & LAURIE B 336 S MAIN STBOWLING GREEN, OH 43402---3009 79305009944 UNEWTSON, JOSHUA S & JENNIFER L 3651 CANOPY CIRCLENAPLES, FL 34120---025225000844 UCopy of POList_500_PL202100000939.A.2.ePacket Pg. 607Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of 3PASCAL, MARLENE CARIDAD 3586 CANOPY CIRNAPLES, FL 34120---025225001869 UPECK, MICHAEL Z & SVETLANA V 1609 MOCKINGBIRD DRNAPLES, FL 34120---060410001668 UPELLEGRINI, ANDREA V 3589 CANOPY CIRNAPLES, FL 34120---025225000543 UPILAT, MARCIN P & IZABELA 3631 CANOPY CIRNAPLES, FL 34120---025225000747 UPLOCHARCZYK JR, JOHN MICHAEL MORGAN DANIELLE HINDS 3420 PILOT CIRNAPLES, FL 34120---081080004786 UPOKA, MICHAEL ATTILA & KELLY 3605 CANOPY CIRCLENAPLES, FL 34120---025225000624 UQYTYKU, BESNIK & INIDA 3352 PILOT CIRNAPLES, FL 34120---081080001103 UQYTYKU, ILIR & EDLIRA 3348 PILOT CIRNAPLES, FL 34120---081080001129 URAYNOR, CHRISTOPHER DONNA DOHERTY3624 CANOPY CIRCLE NAPLES, FL 34120---025225001762 UREGAN, DOMINIC A & DENISE R 8621 GLENEAGLE WAYNAPLES, FL 34120---079305009960 URICHARD K & PAMELA J HUBER QUALIFIED SPOUSAL TRUST 1647 SONGBIRD CT NAPLES, FL 34120---060410001367 URICHARD W NELTNER REV TRUST 8641 GLENEAGLE WAYNAPLES, FL 34120---1686 79305009863 URINGHAM, LEWIS JAY KRISTEN LYNETTE RINGHAM 3380 PILOT CIRNAPLES, FL 34120---081080004980 UROLAND, SCOTT A 3324 PILOT CIRCLENAPLES, FL 34120---081080001242 UROMERO QUILES, FRANCES ILLIANA 3340 PILOT CIRCLENAPLES, FL 34120---081080001161 UROUSH, JASON C & LORI H 3376 PILOT CIRCLENAPLES, FL 34120---081080005002 USAINI, HARVINDER H HARPREET K BUDHIRAJA3320 PILOT CIRCLE NAPLES, FL 34120---081080001268 USAYRE, JAMES PATRICK WENDY BETH SAYRE 9 TULIP TREE DR GARNERVILLE, NY 10923---079305009326 USHELLEY J RYAN TRUST 1605 MOCKINGBIRD DRNAPLES, FL 34120---060410001684 USHOPLACK, TORREY ELIZABETH 3581 CANOPY CIRNAPLES, FL 34120---025225000501 USMITH, MAUREEN K 3664 CANOPY CIRNAPLES, FL 34120---025225001681 USTEINBERG, AARON J & AUDREY T3582 CANOPY CIRNAPLES, FL 34120---025225001885 USTONE, WINNIFRED L KEVIN EDWARD GORHAM 8518 GLENEAGLE WAY NAPLES, FL 34120---1683 79305009083 USUN BROADCASTING INC 2824 PALM BEACH BLVDFT MYERS, FL 33916---1503 00205280007 UTHEODORE, MARC JOSEPH ASHTON KAY THEODORE 3315 PILOT CIRNAPLES, FL 34120---081080002063 UTYRRELL, BRIDGET SARAH SHELDON CURTIS TYRRELL III3404 PILOT CIRCLE NAPLES, FL 34120---081080004867 UVANDERBILT CMMTY ASSOC INC 8250 DANBURY BLVDNAPLES, FL 34120---1631 79305006662 UVANDERBILT CMMTY ASSOC INC 8250 DANBURY BLVDNAPLES, FL 34120---1631 79305007263 UVANDERBILT CMMTY ASSOC INC 8250 DANBURY BLVDNAPLES, FL 34120---1631 79305007522 UVENABLE, ROGER HAROLD ELIZABETH ROBINSON VENABLE 3360 PILOT CIRCLE NAPLES, FL 34120---081080005086 UWHITE, THOMAS D & BRIGITTE 3578 CANOPY CIRCLENAPLES, FL 34120---025225001908 UWILLIAM A SERENIUS REV TRUST 8554 GLENEAGLE WAYNAPLES, FL 34120---079305009504 UWINKLEPLECK, JOHN G & NANCY G 8558 GLENEAGLE WAYNAPLES, FL 34120---079305009481 UWRAGG, GARRY RICHARD ELIZABETH CAROLE WRAGG 3364 PILOT CIRCLE NAPLES, FL 34120---081080005060 UYURKO, DREW ALBERT LESLEE JEAN YURKO 1651 SONGBIRD CT NAPLES, FL 34120---060410001341 UZAKAIB MD, DR EDWARD A JILL ARNOLD ZAKAIB 3805 DOVER ROAD RICHMOND, VA 23221---079305009928 UZAWACKY, TIMOTHY MATTHEW MANDI ELAYNE ZAWACKY 3384 PILOT CIRCLE NAPLES, FL 34120---081080004964 UFLYNN, MARILYN A & JOHN R 24 OLD MILL TERRTORONTO M8X 1A2 CANADA 79305009407 FCopy of POList_500_PL202100000939.A.2.ePacket Pg. 608Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 609 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliercountyfl.gov (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Hybrid Virtual Quasi-Judicial Public Hearing Waiver Emergency/Executive Order 2020-04 Hearing of the Collier County Planning Commission and Board of County Commissioners For Petition Number(s): _________________________________________________________________ Regarding the above subject petition number(s), ________________________________ (Name of Applicant) elects to proceed during the declared emergency with hybrid virtual public hearings of the Collier County Planning Commission and Board of County Commissioners, and waives the right to contest any procedural irregularity due to the hybrid virtual nature of the public hearing. Name: _________________________________ Date: ___________________________ Signature*: ______________________________ Applicant Legal Counsel to Applicant * This form must be signed by either the Applicant (if the applicant is a corporate entity, this must be an officer of the corporate entity) or the legal counsel to the Applicant. 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 610 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) CSN NIM Reservation Name Sent Zoom Link Accepted Zoom Zoom Attendance Organization Email Address Phone # ZOOM:Public 1 Donna Taylor NO NO NO Donna07891@gmail.com 2 Pete Russano YES YES YES Peterussano@yahoo.com 13535 Manchester Way (239)-216-1296 3 Thomas DiFusco YES NO NO tomdif67@gmail.com 3269 Amanda Lane, unit 2 (516)-316-2597 4 Jonathan Burt YES NO NO jdburt321@gmail.com 3285 Pine Ridge Road (239)-207-2735 5 Josey Wydrinski YES YES YES jwydrinski@outlook.com 13370 Kent Street (630)-640-5200 6 Ed Clark and Mrs YES NO NO jedwinclark911@gmail.com 7105 Sable Ridge Ln (727)-804-2298 7 8 9 10 11 In Person:Public & Staff 1 Lin Brandis Linbrandis@yahoo.com 13492 Cambridge Lane (217)-816-2169 2 Krafter1012@yahoo.com 3250 Cypress Glen Way #417 (407)-498-0262 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Project Team Ken Gallander In person Blake Finnegan In person Joel Blikstad In person 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 611 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) 9.A.2.ePacket Pg. 612Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) 6610 Willow Park Drive, Suite 200, Naples, Florida 34109 • (239) 597-0575, fax: (239) 597-0578 • www.consult-rwa.com Page 1 of 2 K:\2009\090288.00.29 CSN - Service Rd Alignment & Spoon Parcel\05 Neighborhood Information Meeting\Working Docs\CSN PUDA - NIM Summary.docx DATE: July 23, 2021 TO: Timothy Finn, Principal Planner Collier County – Growth Management Department: Zoning Division FROM: Kenrick S. Gallander, AICP Director of Planning RWA Engineering PROJECT NAME: CSN PUDA – (PL#: PL20210000731) SUBJECT: Neighborhood Information Meeting – Summary A Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM) was held on July 14, at 5:30pm at the Community School of Naples, 13275 Livingston Road, Naples, FL 34109 in the Student Union Building - Lecture Hall, Second Floor. Attendees are as follows: • Kenrick Gallander, AICP, Director of Planning – RWA Engineering • Blake Finnegan, Associate Planner – RWA Engineering • Joel Blikstad, P.E., Senior Professional Engineer – RWA Engineering • Timothy Finn, AICP, Principal Planner – Collier County • Please refer to the attached Sign-In Sheet and NIM ZOOM Reservation Tracker Sheet for all other attendees. Intro Summary (Started at 5:30 p.m.): Mr. Gallander began the meeting introducing himself and due to the meeting being done virtually as well, he ensured those attending via Zoom could hear and see the meeting online. Once confirmed, Mr. Gallander proceeded to outline the meeting, which would include a brief presentation and following the presentation would have time for questions and answers. MEMORANDUM 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 613 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) 6610 Willow Park Drive, Suite 200, Naples, Florida 34109 • (239) 597-0575, fax: (239) 597-0578 • www.consult-rwa.com Page 2 of 2 The presentation included a description of the subject property location and details of the property. Mr. Gallander went on to further detail the request, which is to revise the overall CFPUD boundary by rezoning a portion of the existing property from RSF-3 to CFPUD. Mr. Gallander concluded the presentation and then opened the floor for questions/comments/input from those in attendance. Questions/Comments asked or offered at the meeting: Q/C: What impact will this addition have on traffic? A: There will be no impact on traffic. This addition will be used to support the existing students and faculty. The County also granted a “Letter of No Impact TIS Waiver.” Q/C: Why did they choose not to encompass the land within the CFPUD at time of the original approval? A: Mr. Gallander indicated that when the rezone was processed back in 2012, there were some title or ownership/real estate concerns, so they had decided to exclude it at that time. It has since been resolved and now they have determined it was the appropriate time to do so. The meeting adjourned at approximately 5:51 p.m. 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 614 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 615 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 616 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 617 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 618 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) Page 1 6610 Willow Park Drive Suite 200 Naples, FL 34109 | (239) 597-0575 | Fax (239) 597-0578 www.consult-rwa.com K:\2009\090288.00.29 CSN - Service Rd Alignment & Spoon Parcel\05 Neighborhood Information Meeting\NIM Mailer CSN APPROVED.docx June 29, 2021 Subject: Neighborhood Information Meeting Community School of Naples PUDA Application (PL20210000731) Dear Property Owner: Please be advised that a formal application has been submitted to Collier County seeking approval of an amendment to the existing Community Facility Planned Unit Development (CFPUD) to revise the overall CFPUD boundary. The Community School of Naples subject property is 77± acres and is located at 13275 Livingston Road in Section 12, Township 49 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. The Petitioner is specifically asking the County to address the following: •Seek approval of a Planned Unit Development Amendment (PUDA) to revise the overall CFPUD boundary, which will allow for future development supporting the Community School of Naples. In compliance with the Land Development Code requirements, a Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM) will be held to provide you an opportunity to become fully aware of our development intentions and to give you an opportunity to influence the form of development. The Neighborhood Information Meeting will be held at 5:30pm on Wednesday, July 14, 2021, at the Community School of Naples, 13275 Livingston Road, Naples, FL 34109 in the Student Union Building - Lecture Hall, Second Floor. Due to COVID-19, special accommodations will be made to allow people to attend in person or virtually. The meeting will be held indoors where CDC guidelines will be observed. Reservations for in-person meeting attendance is required to ensure social distancing can be met. The meeting will also be online via Zoom. Should you choose to either participate in the Zoom meeting or want to attend in-person, please notify us via email at bfinnegan@consult-rwa.com prior to July 13, 2021, to allow us to send you login instructions and document your reservation. Should you have questions prior to the meeting, please also contact me via email at kgallander@consult-rwa.com or 239-597-0575. Sincerely, RWA, Inc. Kenrick S. Gallander, AICP Director of Planning KSG/ 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 619 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) Page 2 6610 Willow Park Drive Suite 200 Naples, FL 34109 | (239) 597-0575 | Fax (239) 597-0578 www.consult-rwa.com Project Location Map 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 620 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) 1 NAME1 NAME2 NAME3 NAME4 NAME5 NAME6 FOLIO ADDRESSTYPE 13490 OLD LIVINGSTON RD LLC 13490 OLD LIVINGSTON RD NAPLES, FL 34109---0 38450360003 U 3245 CYPRESS GLEN WAY 513 LLC 6350 PELICAN BAY BLVD #B101 NAPLES, FL 34108---0 29690005263 U 3271 TAMARA DRIVE LLC PO BOX 111132 NAPLES, FL 34108---119 29698001609 U AELISH S CLIFFORD REV TRUST 52 OLD WOOD ROAD AVON, CT 06001---0 54470000084 U AGUERREBERE, ESTEBAN & ONEIDA 3304 LISA LANE #103 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 29698002064 U AMISANO, FRANKLIN P 199 MOUNTAIN REST LAKE RD MOUNTAIN REST, SC 29664---0 29690005043 U ANGER, ARTHUR DIANA B MARTIN 6838 LANTANA BRIDGE ROAD #203 NAPLES, FL 34109---6117 29690005182 U ANN, LESLIE 3265 AMANDA LN APT 4 NAPLES, FL 34109---3909 29698000862 U ARADO, JAMES 1012 SOUTH LOOMIS UNIT F CHICAGO, IL 60607---0 54470000369 U ARTIS MANUS AT THE GULF OF FLORIDA LLC 27045 SERRANO WAY BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34135---0 29690004400 U ASHLEY, BARBARA 3245 CYPRESS GLEN WAY UNIT 511 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 29690005221 U BACKUS, GREGORY C & JOANNA S 13584 MANDARIN CIR NAPLES, FL 34109---0 76480014145 U BAJRAKTAREVIC, SAFET 15570 SUMMIT PLACE CIRCLE NAPLES, FL 34119---0 29690004264 U BAKHTIN, VASSYL & MARIYA 3225 CYPRESS GLEN WAY APT 103 NAPLES, FL 34109---3872 29690000064 U BANO, ANISA 3295 MEGAN LANE #92 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 29698001845 U BANO, KUJTIM & BALLKEZE 3254 TAMARA DR APT 5 NAPLES, FL 34109---3862 29698000105 U BARLOW, THERESA J 725 STONEHOUSE RD MOORESTOWN, NJ 08057---2120 54470000123 U BARRERA, VICTORIA M 3250 CYPRESS GLEN WAY #405 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 29690004109 U BARRERO, GISELA 3305 LISA LN #114 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 29698002284 U BARUA, MANOJ & MADHURI 1032 PORT ORANGE COURT NAPLES, FL 34120---0 29698000202 U BASLI, JOSEPH P & KAREN M 3115 LANCASTER DRIVE #1 NAPLES, FL 34105---0 54470002105 U BAYBAYAN, RUZANNA 3294 MEGAN LN #2 NAPLES, FL 34109---3897 29698001641 U BERNTHAL, DEBORAH A JAMIE BERNTHAL ANDERSEN 13514 CAMBRIDGE LANE NAPLES, FL 34109---0 56452002587 U BINEVA, RALITSA 14921 SUMMIT PLACE CIR NAPLES, FL 34119---0 29698000244 U BLACKFORD, HENRY W KATHLEEN R BLACKFORD 3304 LISA LN APT 1 NAPLES, FL 34109---3899 29698002022 U BLANCO, MARIO F 3254 TAMARA DR #4 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 29698000082 U BORAN, THOMAS V & KAY L 1822 RIDGEWOOD RD ORWIGSBURG, PA 17961---9525 54470002286 U BRENDA KAY DINORCIA REV TRUST 143 CARIBBEAN COURT NAPLES, FL 34108---0 29690005328 U BUCKHOLTS, WILLIAM CHRISTOPHER 3268 AMANDA LN #1 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 29698000503 U BUENO, LISA ROGERIO BUENO 4 CRAIG RD CHELMSFORD, MA 01824---4704 29698001007 U BURTON, GEOFFREY L 3235 CYPRESS GLEN WAY APT 314 NAPLES, FL 34109---3844 29690003281 U BUSHATI, BESNIK 8360 LAUREL LAKES BLVD NAPLES, FL 34119---0 29698001586 U CABARCAS, MARIELA & ANDRES 3258 TAMARA DR #2 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 29698000163 U CAHILL JR, WILLIAM T JANE E CAHILL 479 LOUCROFT ROAD HADDONFIELD, NJ 08033---0 54470000107 U CAHILL, PATRICK & ALI 13592 MANDARIN CIR NAPLES, FL 34109---0 76480014103 U CAISIM, VEACESLAV 3289 LINDSEY LANE #6 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 29698001405 U CALLEJA, JORGE & GISSELLE 7100 SABLE RIDGE LN NAPLES, FL 34109---3868 38450280002 U CANO, CRISTINA 3309 LISA LANE UNIT 118 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 29698002365 U CARABBA, CHRISTOPHER ADRIANA CARABBA 9986 BOCA CIR NAPLES, FL 34109---0 29690005425 U CARIDE, FERNANDA B GONZALEZ JULIO ADRIAN BATISTA 3269 AMANDA LANE #37 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 29698000749 U CARIDI, PHILIP & MARY 14 LAKE PARK DRIVE CONNEAUT, OH 44030---0 29690004060 U CARUCCI, NICHOLAS & LUCY 14 FRANCINE PLACE SHIRLEY, NY 11967---0 29698000901 U CARUCCI, NICHOLAS & LUCY 14 FRANCINE PLACE SHIRLEY, NY 11967---0 29690005140 U CATUZZI, PETER BARBARA J TROIA 3235 CYPRESS GLEN WAY APT 324 NAPLES, FL 34109---3845 29690003485 U CAWTHORNE, KATHLEEN 13470 KENT ST NAPLES, FL 34109---3889 56452002846 U CERON, JAIME LUZ M CERON 3480 38TH AVE SE NAPLES, FL 34117---0 29698000309 U CERON, JAIME A & LUZ M 3480 38TH AVE SE NAPLES, FL 34117---8838 29690004125 U CERON, JAIME A & LUZ M 3480 38TH AVE SE NAPLES, FL 34117---8838 29690004426 U CERON, JAIME A & LUZ M 3480 38TH AVE SE NAPLES, FL 34117---8838 29698002161 U CERON, JAIME A & LUZ M 3480 38TH AVE SE NAPLES, FL 34117---8838 29698002187 U CHAKAROV, YORDAN G PETYA D CHAKAROVA 3305 LISA LN UNIT 2 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 29698002242 U CHARLES & LOUISE COSTAS TRUST 13596 MANDARIN CIR NAPLES, FL 34109---569 76480014080 U CHERNOGRITSKAYA, LARISSA 3225 CYPRESS GLEN WAY #115 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 29690000307 U CHRISTOPHER M PHILLIPS TRUST 13588 MANDARIN CIRCLE NAPLES, FL 34109---0 76480014129 U CLARK, MARTHA G & J EDWIN 7105 SABLE RIDGE LN NAPLES, FL 34109---0 38450400002 U COLDSTREAM LLC 5061 COLDSTREAM LANE NAPLES, FL 34104---0 29698001201 U COLLIER CNTY TRANSPORTATION RIGHT-OF-WAY 2885 HORSESHOE DRIVE S NAPLES, FL 34104---0 00256280001 U COMBS, ELLA IONESCU 3308 LISA LANE #2 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 29698002145 U COMM SCHOOL OF NAPLES INC 13275 LIVINGSTON RD NAPLES, FL 34109---3859 00256320000 U COOPER, PAUL DAVIS & TESSA 13577 MANDARIN CIR NAPLES, FL 34109---0 76480015241 U CREAMER, PATRICK E LEONA A DEMALINE 520 YACHT CLUB DR OCEAN PINES, MD 21811---9407 29690000323 U CREENA VERGHESE REV TRUST 6920 SABLE RIDGE LN NAPLES, FL 34109---3804 38450080008 U CREENA VERGHESE REV TRUST 6920 SABLE RIDGE LN NAPLES, FL 34109---3804 38450080105 U CROUCH, DAVID GEORGE 13547 MANCHESTER WAY NAPLES, FL 34109---3916 56452001847 U CROUCH, MICHAEL JEFFREY 13508 CAMBRIDGE LN NAPLES, FL 34109---3913 56452002561 U CUNNUP, DAVID THOMAS JENNIFER POWELL CUNNUP 3250 CYPRESS GLEN WAY #415 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 29690004303 U CURTI, DOINA V 3289 LINDSEY LN #5 NAPLES, FL 34109---3904 29698001382 U CUTRONE, JINGFANG FRANKLYN L CUTRONE JR 448 MASTERSON CT EWING, NJ 08618---0 56452001520 U CYPRESS GLEN MASTER ASSOCIATION INC % SENTRY MGMT INC 2180 WEST SR 434 STE 5000 LONGWOOD, FL 32779---0 00255400002 U CYPRESS STONE INC 3250 BENICIA COURT NAPLES, FL 34109---0 29690003184 U Notice: This data belongs to the Collier County Property Appraiser's Office (CCPA). Therefore, the recipient agrees not to represent this data to anyone as other than CCPA provided data. The recipient may not transfer this data to others without consent from the CCPA.Petition: PL20210000731 | Buffer: 500' | Date: 6/28/2021 | Site Location: 00256320000 NIM Mailing list 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 621 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of 2 DALBY, MICHAEL E & GEORGIA E 13466 KENT STREET NAPLES, FL 34109---0 56452002862 U DAMBRAUSKAS, THOMAS A LAURA A DAMBRAUSKAS 13458 KENT ST NAPLES, FL 34109---3889 56452002901 U DARCO, CHRISTOPHER RAYMOND JESSICA GAIL DARCO ALEXANDER RAYMOND DARCO CAROLYN LEIGH DARCO 5146 KRISTIN CT NAPLES, FL 34105---0 29698002307 U DAWSON, TIMOTHY W & JENNIFER S 6700 N 300 EAST RD STANFORD, IL 61774---9441 29698000943 U DE LA ROSA, ARIEL J CLARY SUSY LORA JIMENEZ 13572 MANDARIN CIRCLE NAPLES, FL 34109---0 76480014200 U DEBORAH P YOUNG LIV TRUST 3264 AMANDA LANE #22 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 29698000448 U DEIRDRA O COLBERT R/L TRUST 2119 NW 114TH TERRACE CORAL SPRINGS, FL 33071---5763 29690003029 U DELP REVOCABLE TRUST PO BOX 12041 NAPLES, FL 34101---0 29698001146 U DERVISHAJ, MAKSIM & ILLRJANA 3268 AMANDA LN #7 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 29698000626 U DEXTER R GROOSE REV TRUST 3083 LANCASTER DR UNIT 2 NAPLES, FL 34105---5674 54470000440 U DICK, ANDREW J LAURIE M JOHNSON 3285 LINDSEY LN #5 NAPLES, FL 34109---3906 29698001269 U DIEPHOUSE, TERRI 3250 CYPRESS GLEN WAY APT 411 NAPLES, FL 34109---3888 29690004222 U DIFUSCO, VITTORIO THOMAS SELENA DIFUSCO 3408 FREDERICK ST OCEANSIDE, NY 11572---0 29698000765 U DIGIORGIO, JOSEPH ANNE TANZI 14 PILOT LN STATEN ISLAND, NY 10309---0 29698002080 U DINIRO, CHELSEA 3225 CYPRESS GLEN WAY #111 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 29690000226 U DIXON, ASHLEY 3268 AMANDA LANE #2 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 29698000529 U DONAHUE, BENJAMIN J & APRIL JT 13555 MANCHESTER WAY NAPLES, FL 34109---3916 56452001889 U DORIS CARTER SCHNEIDER TRUST 3035 LANCASTER DR #2 NAPLES, FL 34105---5641 54470000204 U DRIES, JANICE & JAMES L 3245 CYPRESS GLEN WAY NAPLES, FL 34109---0 29690005441 U DUHANEY, TRACY ANN MONIQUE 3309 LISA LANE #5 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 29698002404 U EBERT, KARL H & JACQUELIN C 402 CHAMPIONSHIP WAY MOORESTOWN, NJ 08057---0 54470000343 U EILEEN MCLAUGHLIN TRUST 10619 GOLF RD ORLAND PARK, IL 60462---0 54470000026 U ELDRIDGE, JAMES L & CATHRYN O 13450 OLD LIVINGSTON RD NAPLES, FL 34109---3855 38450200008 U ESPINOSA, JUAN DAVID JULIANA RUEDA 13569 MANDARIN CIR NAPLES, FL 34109---0 76480015209 U ETKIN, ISABEL 3147 LANCASTER DR #3 NAPLES, FL 34105---6680 54470002309 U FABELLA, PHILIP LILLEY 3281 LINDSEY LN APT 1 NAPLES, FL 34109---3908 29698001162 U FACCENDA SR, MICHAEL & DONNA M 2613 BINGHAM DR PITTSBURGH, PA 15241---3902 29690003362 U FALASCA, DANIEL S & HELENE 223 COUNTRY CLUB LN BUENA, NJ 08310---0 54470000408 U FERNANDEZ JR ET AL, JOSE M 3304 LISA LANE #2 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 29698002048 U FIGUEROA, ARNOLD R CAROLINA SALINAS 13531 CAMBRIDGE LN NAPLES, FL 34109---3914 56452002448 U FLEMIG, MARSHA G 3285 LINDSEY LN #1 NAPLES, FL 34109---3906 29698001188 U FLORES, CARMEN YENNY 3235 CYPRESS GLEN WAY #303 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 29690003061 U FORSHEE, MACHELLE B DAVID CLARKE 3235 CYPRESS GLEN WAY APT 323 NAPLES, FL 34109---3845 29690003469 U FRY, DEAN DOMINIKA DUDZIAK-FRY 13488 CAMBRIDGE LN NAPLES, FL 34109---3907 56452002781 U GANI, BLEDAR & ELMIRA 774 HOLMDEL RD HOLMDEL, NJ 07733---0 29698001764 U GARDNER, THOMAS PAUL 3235 CYPRESS GLEN WAY UNIT 320 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 29690003401 U GEARY III, RICHARD F 5105 TALLOWOOD WAY NAPLES, FL 34116---5007 29690003045 U GETLER, DIANE E 3285 LINDSEY LN #4 NAPLES, FL 34109---3906 29698001243 U GHAZIZADEH, HOMAYON 3280 LINDSEY LN APT 5 NAPLES, FL 34109---3905 29698000985 U GIAMBANCO, ANTHONY GIUSEPPE GIAMBANCO 7233 POINTE PLACE MECHANICSVILLE, VA 23116---0 56452002341 U GIBBS, JAMES M 3099 LANCASTER DR #702 NAPLES, FL 34105---0 54470002040 U GIBSON II, WILLIAM K 13551 MANCHESTER WAY NAPLES, FL 34109---0 56452001863 U GIBSON, JESSICA 13340 OLD LIVINGSTON RD NAPLES, FL 34109---0 38450120007 U GILL, IVAN J & CHERYL M 13507 CAMBRIDGE LN NAPLES, FL 34109---3914 56452002325 U GOICOECHEA, LEANDRO ANTONIO GISELLE MARTIN 13560 MANDARIN CIR NAPLES, FL 34109---0 76480014268 U GOODMAN, GEORGE & GAIL L 7 PETTINE ST COVENTRY, RI 02816---7142 29690005124 U GREENFIELD, BETSY 3271 TAMARA DR #5 NAPLES, FL 34109---3895 29698001528 U GRIFFITH, NANCY G 3309 LISA LN #4 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 29698002381 U GUDA, BASHKIM & LUMTURIJE 3299 MEGAN LN #2 NAPLES, FL 34109---3892 29698001942 U HANSON, STEPHEN K 13442 KENT ST NAPLES, FL 34109---3889 56452002985 U HARTIA ET AL, VIOLETA S 3235 CYPRESS GLEN WAY #319 NAPLES, FL 34109---3845 29690003388 U HEINRICH TR, EUGENE A CAROLYN M HEINRICH TR ITF E & C HEINRICH 10-20-94 8535 HARVEST LN DARIEN, IL 60561---1667 29690005289 U HENK, MARVIN E & KATHLEEN 415 HINMAN PL MAMARONECK, NY 10543---2722 29698002268 U HERNANDEZ FAMILY TRUST 51933 MEADOW RIDGE COURT GRANGER, IN 46530---0 76480014187 U HOLEON, LISA 2470 S ROOT RIVER PKY WEST ALLIS, WI 53227---0 29690000242 U HOMOVEC, RALEND F 3250 CYPRESS GLEN WAY #419 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 29690004387 U HOOD JR, KENNETH JAMES MARIZA L LAZOR-HOOD 7065 BOTTLEBRUSH LN NAPLES, FL 34109---0 38450240000 U HOPKINS, DENNIS P 2 KINGS TURN BOURBONNAIS, IL 60914---0 29698001308 U HORVATH, TEREZIA & LADISLAV 3235 CYPRESS GLEN WAY #305 NAPLES, FL 34109---3842 29690003100 U HOUGHTALING, JOHN L MARGARET D HOUGHTALING 3245 CYPRESS GLEN WAY APT 515 NAPLES, FL 34109---3849 29690005302 U HUNT TR, PATSY N PATSY N HUNT TRUST 3805 NORTON HILLS RD NORTON SHORES, MI 49441---4454 54470002260 U ILIEVSKI, ALEKSANDAR 3309 LISA LANE #2 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 29698002349 U ILLARIONOV, RUSLAN ROSA DI SALLE 3225 CYPRESS GLEN WAY #322 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 29690003443 U ISLAS ONS LLC 4380 7TH AVE NW NAPLES, FL 34119---0 29690005027 U J D BURT CO INC 622 SHORELINE DR NAPLES, FL 34119---1807 00255480006 U JAMES J MCGRAW JR REV TRUST 8 HAMPTON LN CINCINNATI, OH 45208---1956 54470002383 U JAMES V GALL & PAMELA J GALL JOINT TENANCY TRUST 2228 FOX RUN DRIVE KANKAKEE, IL 60901---0 29690005386 U JARA, PAOLA R 3268 AMANDA LN #4 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 29698000561 U JAZ AUTOMOTIVE PROPERTIES LLC 4250 MORSE CROSSING COLUMBUS, OH 43219---0 00256360507 U JEFFREY M LANDRY LIV TRUST 781 15TH ST SW NAPLES, FL 34117---0 29698001560 U JEWELL BAILEY TRUST 20417 RIVERBEND SQ #300 STERLING, VA 20165---0 29698001366 U JOAN J JOHNSON LIV REV TRUST 3051 LANCASTER DR #1 NAPLES, FL 34105---5673 54470000262 U JOHNSON, STEPHEN & CAROL D 3294 MEGAN LANE #5 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 29698001706 U JULIANO, BETH H 3067 LANCASTER DR #3 NAPLES, FL 34105---0 54470000385 U KANELLOPOULOS, EFSTATHIOS MILAGROS DEL RIO SILVA 3259 TAMARA DR #3 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 29698000406 U NIM Mailing list 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 622 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of 3 KAREN L RAFTER JAN 17 2019 REVOCABLE TRUST 3250 CYPRESS GLEN WAY #417 NAPLES, FL 34109---3876 29690004345 U KATARZYNA J RYPINA REV TRUST 13504 CAMBRIDGE LN NAPLES, FL 34109---3913 56452002545 U KATHLEEN V PRICE REV TRUST 3083 LANCASTER DR #1 NAPLES, FL 34105---5674 54470000424 U KENNETH K KOCHENOUR DYNASTY TRUST 28900 CAVELL TERR NAPLES, FL 34119---0 29698001081 U KENSINGTON GOLF & CC INC 2700 PINE RIDGE RD NAPLES, FL 34109---5994 52730006607 U KENSINGTON PARK MASTER ASSOCIATION INC C/O NEWELL PROPERTY MGMT 5435 JAEGER RD STE 4 NAPLES, FL 34109---5802 52730006652 U KENSINGTON PARK MSTR ASSN INC % NEWELL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 5435 JAEGER RD STE 4 NAPLES, FL 34109---5802 52730007101 U KENSINGTON PARK MSTR ASSN INC % NEWELL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 5435 JAEGER RD STE 4 NAPLES, FL 34109---5802 52730007952 U KENSINGTON PARK MSTR ASSN INC % NEWELL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 5435 JAEGER RD STE 4 NAPLES, FL 34109---5802 52731002804 U KENSINGTON PARK MSTR ASSN INC % NEWELL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 5435 JAEGER RD STE 4 NAPLES, FL 34109---5802 52731002901 U KENSINGTON PARK MSTR ASSN INC % NEWLL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 5435 JAEGER RD STE 4 NAPLES, FL 34109---5802 52730008058 U KENSINGTON PARK MSTR ASSN INC C/O NEWELL PROPERTY MNGMT 5435 JAEGER RD STE 4 NAPLES, FL 34109---5802 52730007350 U KINAHAN, SHELAGH MARGARET 5 HIGH POINT CIR W #104 NAPLES, FL 34103---0 29698001104 U KINSLAND, KELLY & NAZREEN 3225 CYPRESS GLEN WAY APT 109 NAPLES, FL 34109---3886 29690000187 U KNICKERBOCKER PROPERTIES INC C/O SENTINEL REAL EST CORP 1251 AVENUE OF THE AMERICAS NEW YORK, NY 10020---1104 00256480005 U KOLEK, DALIBOR 3264 AMANDA LN #3 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 29698000464 U KOVACEVIC, SLOBODAN 1495 BRISTOL TRAIL RD LAKE ZURICH, IL 60047---0 29698001984 U KURLANDER, JOY 3235 CYPRESS GLEN WAY #308 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 29690003168 U LAKO, ERVIN & ALMA 3289 LINDSEY LANE #3 NAPLES, FL 34109---3904 29698001340 U LAMPERT, VICTORIA L 3294 MEGAN LN #1 NAPLES, FL 34109---3897 29698001625 U LANCASTER BUILDING CORP C/O JOHN N BRUGGER 600 5TH AVE S STE 207 NAPLES, FL 34102---6642 52731002600 U LARKIN, DAVID & ROBIN PO BOX 7946 NAPLES, FL 34101---0 54470002189 U LE, JENNIFER NGOC 6745 WHIPPLEWOOD WAY LAS VEGAS, NV 89148---0 29698001324 U LEE TR, GEORGE A MARY ANN LEE TR GEORGE A LEE REVOCABLE TRUST MARY ANN LEE REVOCABLE TRUST 3131 LANCASTER DR # 904 NAPLES, FL 34105---6666 54470002244 U LEONARD, REBECCA 3561 25TH AVE SW NAPLES, FL 34117---0 29698000707 U LIMKA, ADRIATIK 3250 CYPRESS GLEN WAY #409 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 29690004183 U LINDA J BRANDIS TRUST 13492 CAMBRIDGE LANE NAPLES, FL 34109---0 56452002804 U LINDA L POPE LIVING TRUST 6801 POST OAK COVE MEMPHIS, TN 38119---0 56452003764 U LLOGORI, EVANTHI & LLAMBI 3258 TAMARA DRIVE #1 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 29698000147 U LORA TREJO, NORMA 14370 MANCHESTER DR NAPLES, FL 34114---8626 29698002323 U LUCKENBILL, CHRISTOPHER VELECIA LUCKENBILL 13500 CAMBRIDGE LN NAPLES, FL 34109---3913 56452002529 U LUND, KRISTIN N 3099 LANCASTER DR APT 4 NAPLES, FL 34105---6677 54470002082 U LUNDSTROM, GREG L CHRISTINA V LUNDSTROM 13523 CAMBRIDGE LN NAPLES, FL 34109---3914 56452002406 U LYNCH, JAMES MARY LYNCH 37 OVERLOOD DR NORTH KINGSTOWN, RI 02852---0 56452002969 U LYUKHNYCH, NATALIYA ROBERT D NARDINI 13527 CAMBRIDGE LN NAPLES, FL 34109---0 56452002422 U MACHADO, ARBEY LILIANA HURTADO 3225 CYPRESS GLEN WAY #108 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 29690000161 U MAGLIONE, DOMENIC F 3250 CYPRESS GLEN WAY #408 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 29690004167 U MAKKAR, HOSSAM & MARINA 11 WILSON RD LEXINGTON, MA 02421---0 29690004484 U MANCHESTER SQUARE MASTER ASSOCIATION INC %SENTRY MGT, INC 2180 W SR 434 STE 5000 LONGWOOD, FL 32779---0 56452001245 U MANCHESTER SQUARE MASTER ASSOCIATION INC %SENTRY MGT, INC 2180 W SR 434 STE 5000 LONGWOOD, FL 32779---0 56452002723 U MANCHESTER SQUARE MASTER ASSOCIATION INC %SENTRY MGT, INC 2180 W SR 434 STE 5000 LONGWOOD, FL 32779---0 56452002749 U MANCHESTER SQUARE MASTER ASSOCIATION INC %SENTRY MGT, INC 2180 W SR 434 STE 5000 LONGWOOD, FL 32779---0 56452002765 U MANCHESTER SQUARE MASTER ASSOCIATION INC %SENTRY MGT, INC 2180 W SR 434 STE 5000 LONGWOOD, FL 32779---0 56452000042 U MANCHESTER SQUARE MASTER ASSOCIATION INC %SENTRY MGT, INC 2180 W SR 434 STE 5000 LONGWOOD, FL 32779---0 56452000026 U MANIC, IVAN 3280 LINDSEY LANE #3 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 29698001023 U MARBELLA ISLES HOA INC 13565 MONTICELLO BLVD NAPLES, FL 34106---0 76480010246 U MARBELLA ISLES HOA INC 13565 MONTICELLO BLVD NAPLES, FL 34106---0 76480010343 U MARIE M HEILAND REV TRUST 13530 CAMBRIDGE LN NAPLES, FL 34109---3913 56452002642 U MARKOVSKI, TRPKO & MILLCA 47851 GOLDRIDGE LN MACOMB, MI 48044---2423 29690005360 U MARQUINA HOLDINGS LLC 4750 3RD AVE SW NAPLES, FL 34119---0 29698000228 U MATTINGLY, DAVID ALLEN 3235 CYPRESS GLEN WAY APT 313 NAPLES, FL 34109---3844 29690003265 U MAYA, ERIC D & KATHRYN L 13543 MANCHESTER WAY NAPLES, FL 34109---3916 56452001821 U MCCOMIS, STEPHEN H & JONNIE M 3250 CYPRESS GLEN WAY APT 407 NAPLES, FL 34109---3888 29690004141 U MCCUAN, W PATRICK LAND TRUST AGREEMENT UTD 12/2/04 3281 LINDSEY LN APT 3 NAPLES, FL 34109---3908 29698001120 U MCELHERAN, BETHANY DUANE MCELHERAN 3265 AMANDA LANE #5 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 29698000846 U MCGUIRE, GERALD L & MARIE C 6 EVERGREEN LN NORTH OAKS, MN 55127---0 54470002367 U MCKEE FAMILY REVOC TRUST 3115 LANCASTER DR #802 NAPLES, FL 34105---0 54470002121 U MCLANE JR, CHARLES D & YING W 7090 SANDALWOOD LN NAPLES, FL 34109---516 38450480006 U MCNEARNEY, JOHN P JAYNE F NEAL 25 UPPER CONWAY CT CHESTERFIELD, MO 63017---0 54470000246 U MELNIKOV, MICHAEL G & ELENA G 3235 CYPRESS GLEN WAY APT 315 NAPLES, FL 34109---3844 29690003304 U MIHOLOVICH, STEPHEN T LISA M MULLALY 13608 MANDARIN CIR NAPLES, FL 34109---0 76480014022 U MIKES, JASON HAMILTON HEATHER RENEE MOBLEY MIKES 487 CHATHAM CIR NAPLES, FL 34110---0 29690000022 U MINO, ILIR 2563 22ND ST #1A ASTORIA, NY 11102---0 29698001780 U MITCHELL, KARLY JEAN 3235 CYPRESS GLEN WAY #307 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 29690003142 U MOHLER, LAURA ANN 201 DONERAIL CT HAVRE DE GRACE, MD 21078---0 29690005483 U MOLEANO PROPERTIES LLC 3294 MEGAN LN #3 NAPLES, FL 34109---3897 29698001667 U MOLEANO PROPERTIES LLC 3294 MEGAN LN #3 NAPLES, FL 34109---3897 29698001968 U MOLEANO PROPERTIES LLC 3294 MEGAN LN APT 3 NAPLES, FL 34109---3897 29698000325 U MOLEANO PROPERTIES LLC 3294 MEGAN LN APT 3 NAPLES, FL 34109---3897 29698001049 U MORRIS, KIMBALL & LOUISE F 3618 EDEN PLACE CARMEL, IN 46033---0 54470002163 U MULLER, HUIBERT M 13559 MANCHESTER WAY NAPLES, FL 34109---3916 56452001902 U MULLER, RICHARD MARTINA PLANAVSKA PO BOX 10921 NAPLES, FL 34101---921 29698001803 U MURPHY, GERALDINE R 7 WEST ST WALPOLE, MA 02081---2856 54470002228 U MUSCIANISI, PETER J 1 NOVA RD BAYVILLE, NY 11709---1409 29698000545 U NAGHIB, ALI B 4815 BOXWOOD WAY NAPLES, FL 34116---3927 29698000367 U NIM Mailing list 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 623 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of 4 NAKOLLOFSKI, STAVRI NORILDA TOSHKA 3295 MEGAN LN #1 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 29698001887 U NAKOLLOFSKI, STAVRI NORILDA TOSHKA 3295 MEGAN LN #1 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 29698001829 U NANCY B PANELLA REV TRUST 13604 MANDARIN CIRCLE NAPLES, FL 34109---0 76480014048 U NAPLES BLUE PROPERTIES LLC PO BOX 110101 NAPLES, FL 34108---0 29698001065 U NATALE, AMATO & JOANN 3225 CYPRESS GLEN WAY APT 102 NAPLES, FL 34109---3872 29690000048 U NICE, WILLIAM L & LINDA L 2712 CARRIAGE HILL LN CUYAHOGA FALLS, OH 44223---3360 29690005085 U NIE, JIQING KE FENG 16109 PARQUE LANE NAPLES, FL 34110---0 29698000040 U NOLASCO, LOURDES PAMELA 13568 MANDARIN CIRCLE NAPLES, FL 34109---0 76480014226 U O'BRIEN, JOHN P & MARY M 52 GILMORE DR STONY POINT, NY 10980---1044 29698000189 U ODAY, DOUGLAS J 3250 CYPRESS GLEN WAY #416 NAPLES, FL 34109---3876 29690004329 U ODONOVAN, SARAH A 3280 LINDSEY LANE #6 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 29698000969 U OLEZZA, ANA MARIA 1609 SERRANO CIRCLE NAPLES, FL 34105---0 56452002927 U PAGLIOCCA, MICHAEL J JOSEPH R CASILLO PO BOX 41 MIDDLETOWN, NY 10940---41 29690000284 U PARR, MARK H 16725 CABREO DRIVE NAPLES, FL 34110---0 29698000781 U PATTEN, MICHAEL S & LESLIE D 13573 MANDARIN CIR NAPLES, FL 34109---0 76480015225 U PAUL J LANGE REV TRUST DAWN M LANGE REV TRUST 7070 BOTTLEBRUSH LANE NAPLES, FL 34109---0 38450160009 U PAULINE HIMMEL REVOCABLE TRUST 13612 MANDARIN CIRCLE NAPLES, FL 34109---0 76480014006 U PETILLO JR, FELIX J FELIX JOHN PETILLO III 3250 CYPRESS GLEN WAY #412 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 29690004248 U PIZARRO, MARCELA AGUILERA PATRICIA FRANCHEVICH KROOHN 3255 TAMARA DR #5 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 29698000341 U PROVENZANO TR, CHARLES & ANN M ANN M PROVENZANO LIVING TRUST UTD 6/11/98 3051 LANCASTER DR APT 2 NAPLES, FL 34105---5673 54470000288 U PUGH, RAYMOND D COURTNEY N CHAIPEL PUGH 13462 KENT STREET NAPLES, FL 34109---0 56452002888 U PURE, MILES J 13519 CAMBRIDGE LN NAPLES, FL 34109---3914 56452002383 U QOSJA, HASIME 3235 CYPRESS GLEN WAY #317 NAPLES, FL 34109---3844 29690003346 U QUEAR, STEVEN ALAN SHARON LYNN ENSINGER 3245 CYPRESS GLEN WAY #508 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 29690005166 U RADCLIFF, MITCHELL C ELISABETH C RADCLIFF 483 ERIKAS WOODS CT ANN ARBOR, MI 48103---0 29690003126 U RAUCH REVOCABLE TRUST 13600 MANDARIN CIRCLE NAPLES, FL 34109---0 76480014064 U RICCI, LUCIANO 788 PARK SHORE DRIVE #B18 NAPLES, FL 34103---0 29698000642 U RICHARDSON, SHERRIE D 3019 LANCASTER DR #3 NAPLES, FL 34105---5672 54470000149 U ROBALINO, JUAN C MARIA I ORDONEZ 13480 CAMBRIDGE LN NAPLES, FL 34109---3907 56452003748 U ROBERT G & ANN R MIKSA TRUST 2416 165TH PL SE BOTHELL, WA 98012---0 54470000181 U RODRIGUEZ, IBIZA MARCELO AGUIRRE 3225 CYPRESS GLEN WAY #107 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 29690000145 U ROKO, EDMOND & VALENTINA 3225 CYPRESS GLEN WAY APT 113 NAPLES, FL 34109---3886 29690000268 U ROMERO, REBECA 3298 MEGAN LANE #86 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 29698001722 U ROSCIA, PATRICK A & SANDRA E JOHN R=& LINDA CASTRIANO %JOHN CASTRIANO 404 SCHOONER WAY PLYMOUTH, MA 02360---4564 29698001285 U ROWLAND, SCOTT C & ALICIA C 13539 MANCHESTER WAY NAPLES, FL 34109---0 56452001805 U RUSSANO, PETER S & ANJALI T 13535 MANCHESTER WAY NAPLES, FL 34109---3916 56452001782 U RUSSO, SALVATORE A & MARIA 35743 COLLINGWOOD DR STERLING HTS, MI 48312---4333 29690005108 U S & A ACQUISITIONS GROUP INC 8 GLATTLY DR DENVILLE, NJ 07834---0 29698001544 U SAADEH, SAMI M BASSAM SAADE 416 TERRACINA WAY NAPLES, FL 34119---1814 29698000888 U SAAVEDRA, MILTON 3298 MEGAN LN #2 NAPLES, FL 34109---3891 29698001748 U SACS FLORIDA HOLDINGS LTD 3131 LANCASTER DR APT 2 NAPLES, FL 34105---6666 54470002202 U SANDERS, MARK STUART BARBARA ANN SANDERS 3235 CYPRESS GLEN WAY #312 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 29690003249 U SANKAL, TIMOTHY F & SUSAN J 9950 STONE HOLLOW RD MENTOR, OH 44060---6862 29690003087 U SARABACHA, BRIAN SARA TANNER SARABACHA 3225 CYPRESS GLEN WAY #106 NAPLES, FL 34109---3885 29690000129 U SATA, EDINA MOLABECIRI GZIM MOLABECIRI 3250 CYPRESS GLEN WAY # 423 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 29690004468 U SCHELER, RONALD L & BARBARA S 8309 GLASER LN LOUISVILLE, KY 40291---2532 29690003427 U SCHOOL DISTRICT-BCH/OES/ADM BARRON COLLIER HIGH % SUPERINTENDENT 5775 OSCEOLA TRL NAPLES, FL 34109---919 00255120007 U SCHRANK, MICHAEL 4606 EL CAMINO CABOS DRIVE LAS VEGAS, NV 89147---0 29690003320 U SEKALSKI, PRZEMYSLAW 3264 AMANDA LN #4 NAPLES, FL 34109---3903 29698000480 U SERRAINO, FRANCIS A 3250 CYPRESS GLEN WAY #410 NAPLES, FL 34109---3888 29690004206 U SEVILLA, EVELYN 13499 CAMBRIDGE LN NAPLES, FL 34109---3912 56452002286 U SHAHRAKI, SAMMY K 2902 LEONARDO AVE NAPLES, FL 34119---7723 56452002367 U SHANE, JEFFREY A & MARIANNE E 19 DAVIS DRIVE WASHINGTON XING, PA 18977---0 54470000068 U SHANE, KATHLEEN 3003 LANCASTER DR #2 NAPLES, FL 34105---0 54470000042 U SHAPPLEY, TERRI L 1300 VERDE DR #4 NAPLES, FL 34105---0 29690004028 U SHKNEVSKY, HELEN & YAN 1 SAVEL LN SHARON, MA 02067---3028 29698001502 U SHURDHI, ERALD & LIJENA 3269 AMANDA LN #6 NAPLES, FL 34109---3910 29698000684 U SIDOR, MARIA 2711 GRAY MANOR CT BALTIMORE, MD 21222---2212 29698002129 U SILVA, MARTHA 3259 TAMARA DRIVE #2 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 29698000383 U SIMONE B STUDENT REV TRUST 13580 MANDARIN CIRCLE NAPLES, FL 34109---0 76480014161 U SMALL BROTHERS LLC 12810 TAMIAMI TRAIL N NAPLES, FL 34110---0 38450420008 U SOPH, DONALD & DIANE MARY KATHRYN SOPH ZWEIFEL 56 HAMPTON PL CT ST CHARLES, MO 63303---0 29690000080 U SPAETH, DAVID E 3245 CYPRESS GLEN WAY APT 520 NAPLES, FL 34109---3850 29690005409 U SPERO, CHARLES RICHARD 3269 AMANDA LANE #4 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 29698000723 U SPORTS CAMP INC 3275 PINE RIDGE RD NAPLES, FL 34109---5922 63040000104 U STACEY B MACLAY REV TRUST 13585 MANDARIN CIR NAPLES, FL 34109---0 76480015267 U STADLER, MARTIN & KRISTINE 3083 LANCASTER DRIVE #3 NAPLES, FL 34105---0 54470000466 U STIMPFL MAR FAMILY TRUST 3919 LATIGO CANYON ROAD MALIBU, CA 90265---2802 29698002103 U SU, SHIH M 3285 LINDSEY LN #3 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 29698001227 U SUN, LI 13484 CAMBRIDGE LANE NAPLES, FL 34109---0 56452003722 U SUUCTUGU, DURMUS D 3265 AMANDA LN APT 7 NAPLES, FL 34109---3909 29698000804 U TANNASSEE, KENNETH R BARBARA CORNEAL 7643 BRISTOL CIRCLE NAPLES, FL 34120---0 29690005205 U TATE, ALEX & ELEANOR IV TATE 2626 SAILORS WAY NAPLES, FL 34109---0 29698000066 U TAYLOR, DONNA S 3245 CYPRESS GLEN WAY #523 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 29690005467 U TEPER, FRANK J & DONNA L 13043 PENNSYLVANIA AVE HUNTLEY, IL 60142---0 29698000422 U NIM Mailing list 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 624 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of 5 THOMAN, LINDSEY M 3265 AMANDA LANE #6 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 29698000820 U THOMAS J PRITCHARD L/R TRUST 3035 LANCASTER DR #3 NAPLES, FL 34105---5641 54470000220 U TOMASSETTI REVOCABLE TRUST GLORIA ANN PLYSER REV TRUST 13450 KENT STREET NAPLES, FL 34109---0 56452002943 U TOPOLLAJ, ELTON & ALMA 4700 ST CROIX LN #312 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 29698000600 U TOSHKA, KLEVIS 3265 AMANDA LN #1 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 29698000927 U TOSHKA, KLEVIS & NORILDA 3299 MEGAN LN #5 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 29698000024 U TOSHKA, NORILDA 3299 MEGAN LN #5 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 29698002006 U TOUCHETTE, DEREK M & LISA A 13563 MANCHESTER WAY NAPLES, FL 34109---3916 56452001928 U TURAKU, SPIRO 3255 TAMARA DRIVE #1 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 29698000260 U URCELAY, STEVEN M & SUSAN 139-04 CRONSTON AVE BELLE HARBOR, NY 11694---0 54470002325 U VAN ESSEN, SUZANNE M 700 HIDDEN HARBOUR DR NAPLES, FL 34109---8605 29690005247 U VAN HAAGEN Q/D TRUST 3051 LANCASTER DR #4 NAPLES, FL 34105---0 54470000327 U VANDERBILT BCH PROP LLC 3245 CYPRESS GLEN WAY #503 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 29690005069 U VASSOR, FREDY J MARIE HELENE N LEVASSEUR 3275 TAMARA DRIVE #3 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 29698001463 U VESSELLA, MARISA 3225 CYPRESS GLEN WAY #105 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 29690000103 U VIRGINIA A WOODEN REV TRUST 13520 CAMBRIDGE LN NAPLES, FL 34109---3913 56452002600 U VLAD, ADRIAN 3268 AMANDA LANE #5 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 29698000587 U VOIGT III, JACOB JOSEPH RACHEL TAFEL VOIGT 13564 MANDARIN CIRCLE NAPLES, FL 34109---0 76480014242 U VOUCHEVA, TATYANA I STANISLAV E KOLEV 13496 CAMBRIDGE LN NAPLES, FL 34109---3907 56452002820 U W E & C M HANSON FAMILY TRUST 13564 MANCHESTER WAY NAPLES, FL 34109---3915 56452001546 U WACHTEL, LOGAN & LAWRENCE E 3295 MEGAN LN 3 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 29698001861 U WAGNER TR, BARBARA A ROY F WAGNER FAMILY TRUST UTD 02/08/94 11760 STEPHANE DR SHELBY TOWNSHIP, MI 48315---4073 54470002147 U WAHE, MARILYN A 9130 THE LN NAPLES, FL 34109---0 29698002200 U WALKER, COREY 9285 GLENFOREST DR NAPLES, FL 34120---0 29690000200 U WALTER L & LORI RAUSCH TRUST 204 APPLERIDGE CT GIBSONIA, PA 15044---0 54470002406 U WEIBEN, RYON K STEPHANIE L SMITH 13503 CAMBRIDGE LANE NAPLES, FL 34109---0 56452002309 U WEINSTEIN, MARK S & SALLY 3051 LANCASTER DRIVE #3 NAPLES, FL 34105---0 54470000301 U WHITE, MADISON MARIE & FINLAY 3275 TAMARA DRIVE #5 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 29698001421 U WHITTIER, ELINOR M 3235 CYPRESS GLEN WAY #310 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 29690003207 U WILBUR, DOUGLAS C CONSTANCE L WILBUR 370 E SENECA ST SHERRILL, NY 13461---1020 29690003223 U WILSON, KEVIN W & DIOXANA Y 1709 BIRDIE DR NAPLES, FL 34120---0 29698001926 U YULIYANOVA, MARINA HIGOR ANTONIO DO VALLE 3294 MEGAN LANE #4 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 29698001683 U ZILINSKAS, MAGDA 505 MEADOW GRASS LANE LEXINGTON, SC 29072---0 29690004361 U ZULUAGA, MARIA C 3255 TAMARA DR #2 NAPLES, FL 34109---0 29698000286 U REFERENCE ONLY CYPRESS GLEN I A CONDOMINIUM 00256360701 N REFERENCE ONLY CYPRESS GLEN III A CONDOMINIUM 00256361001 N REFERENCE ONLY CYPRESS GLEN IV A CONDOMINIUM 00256360808 N REFERENCE ONLY CYPRESS GLEN V A CONDOMINIUM 00256361108 N REFERENCE ONLY CYPRESS GLEN VILLAGE A CONDOMINIUM 00256361205 N REFERENCE ONLY LANCASTER SQUARE A CONDOMINIUM 52730005103 N REFERENCE ONLY LANCASTER SQUARE III AT KENSINGTON A CONDOMINIUM 52731002626 N CAUSI, FAUD & NAZIQE ATTENHOFERSTRASSE 33 JUNA 8645 SWITZERLAND 29698000121 F FAJARDO, ERNESTO 35 LECKIE AVE STONEY CREEK L8J 2S7 CANADA 29690004280 F FARGNOLI, ANTHONY & KATHRYN 90 RUE BERLIOZ #1804 VERDUN H3E 1N1 CANADA 54470000482 F GRAHAM, ALLISTER P SUSAN L FREEMAN 1135 ROYAL YORK ROAD TORONTO M9A 0C3 CANADA 54470000165 F JAYAPAL, PRIYADEVI 5132 CANADA WAY BURNABY V5E 0C3 CANADA 56452002626 F KAY, JOSEPH NATHAN 94 WALMSLEY BLVD TORONTO M4V 1X6 CANADA 54470002341 F MANN, SANDRA D TIMOTHY D SCHNEIDER 8515 WASCANA GARDENS RD REGINA S4V 1G1 CANADA 29698000668 F MAURA, ANGELO VIA CASETTE 11 CECCANO (FR) 03023 ITALY 29698001447 F MCCALL, NEILSON JAMES ELAINE DIANE MCCALL 148 KETTLE LAKE DR NEW HAMBURG N3A 0C2 CANADA 29690004086 F MIYAMOTO, YASUTERU NISHINARASHINO 3-29-18 FUNABASHI CHIBA 2740815 JAPAN 29690005344 F OPRITA, LIVIU ADRIAN NICOLETA OPRITA 23 HOLLYWOOD AVE #210 TORONTO N2N 7L8 CANADA 29698001900 F OPRITA, LIVIU ADRIAN NICOLETA OPRITA 23 HOLLYWOOD AVENUE APT 210 TORONTO N2N 7K8 CANADA 29698002226 F PELLETIER, CYRIL DOMAINE DE LA BASTIDE 442 ROUTE DE LAIRE ST MICHAEL FALICON 06950 FRANCE 29690004442 F REAL OAKS LIMITED BANNATYNE HOUSE BANNATYNE CHRIST CHURCH BB17030 BARBADOS 54470002024 F RITONDO FLORIDA TRUST 2123 RUE DE SAUTERNES VAUDREUIL-DORION J7V 0G2 CANADA 29698001489 F SIEMERS, ANDREAS CARMENSTRASSE 21 ZURICH 8032 SWITZERLAND 54470002066 F THINWARE INC 156 ENFIELD PLACE STE 1215 MISSISSAUGA L5B 4L8 CANADA 29690004044 F NIM Mailing list 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 625 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING The public is invited to attend a Neighborhood Information Meeting held by RWA, Inc., representing The Community School of Naples, Inc., on: Wednesday, July 14, 2021, at 5:30 pm 13275 Livingston Road, Naples, FL 34109 in the Student Union Building - Lecture Hall, Second Floor The Community School of Naples subject property is 77± acres and is located along Livingston Road, north/northwest of the Honda of Naples Dealership at the intersection of Livingston Road and Pine Ridge Road in Section 12, Township 49 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. The Petitioner is asking the County to approve a Planned Unit Development Amendment (PUDA) to revise the overall CFPUD boundary, which will allow for future development supporting the Community School of Naples. Business and property owners, residents and visitors are welcome to attend the presentation to discuss the project. If you are unable to attend the meeting in-person and would like the opportunity to participate virtually, an on-line meeting will be available. Details related to joining the meeting can be obtained by contacting the individual listed below. Reservations for in-person meeting attendance is required to ensure that the CDC guidelines for social distancing can be achieved. *CONTINUED ON BACK OF PAGE* 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 626 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) If you are unable to attend this meeting, but have questions or comments, they can be directed by mail, phone, or e-mail to: Kenrick S. Gallander, AICP Director of Planning RWA Engineering 6610 Willow Park Drive, Suite 200 Naples, Florida 34109 239-597-0575 kgallander@consult-rwa.com 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 627 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING July 14, 2021, at 5:30pm Community School of Naples CFPUD A PUD Amendment (PUDA) EXISTING AND PROPOSED USE COMPARISION The following is from the Collier County LDC Section 2.03.0 2 specific to the uses intended for the Residential Single Family (RSF-3) Zoning District. Based on the request to amend the subject property from RSF-3 to Community Facility Planned Unit Development (CFPUD), those uses struck through (Example) are those existing uses (permitted, accessory, or conditional) in the RSF-3 zoning district that are not a permitted use, an accessory use, or conditional use as proposed in the Community School of Naples CFPUD. EXISTING USES: 2.03.02 – Residential Zoning Districts. A. Residential Single-Family Districts (RSF-1; RSF-2; RSF-3; RSF-4; RSF-5; RSF-6). The purpose and intent of the residential single-family districts (RSF) is to provide lands primarily for single-family residences. These districts are intended to be single-family residential areas of low density. The nature of the use of property is the same in all of these districts. Variation among the RSF -1, RSF-2, RSF-3, RSF-4, RSF-5 and RSF-6 districts is in requirements for density, lot area, lot width, yards, height, floor area, lot coverage, parking, landscaping and signs. Certain structures and uses designed to serve the immediate needs of the single-family residential development in the RSF districts such as governmental, educational, religious, and noncommercial recreational uses are permitted as conditional uses as long as they preserve and are compatible with the single-family residential character of the RSF district[s]. The RSF districts correspond to and implement the urban mixed use land use designation on the future land use map of the Collier County GMP. The maximum density permissible in the residential single-family (RSF) districts and the urban mixed use land use designation shall be guided, in part, by the density rating system contained in the future land use element of the Collier County GMP. The maximum density permissible or permitted in the RSF district shall not exceed the density permissible under the density rating system, except as permitted by policies contained in the future land use element. 1. The following subsections identify the uses that are permissible by right and the uses that are allowable as accessory or conditional uses in the residential single-family districts (RSF). a. Permitted uses. 1.Single-family dwellings. 2.Family care facilities, subject to section 5.05.04. 3.Educational plants and public schools with an agreement with Collier County, as described in LDC section 5.05.14; however, any high school located in this district is subject to a compatibility review as described in LDC section 10.02.03. 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 628 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) b. Accessory Uses. 1.Uses and structures that are accessory and incidental to uses permitted as of right in the RSF districts. 2.Private docks and boathouses, subject to section 5.03.06. 3.One guesthouse, subject to section 5.03.03. 4.Recreational facilities that serve as an integral part of a residential development and have been designated, reviewed and approved on a site development plan or preliminary subdivision plat for that development. Recreational facilities may include, but are not limited to, golf course, clubhouse, community center building and tennis facilities, parks, playgrounds and playfields. c. Conditional uses. The following uses are permissible as conditional uses in the residential single-family districts (RSF), subject to the standards and procedures established in LDC section 10.08.00. 1.Noncommercial boat launch and multiple dock facilities, subject to the applicable review criteria set forth in section 5.03.06. 2.Churches. 3.Schools, private. 4.Child care centers and adult day care centers. 5.Cluster development to include one- and two-family structures, subject to section 4.02.04. 6.Golf courses. 7.Group care facilities (category I); care units subject to the provisions of LDC subsection 2.03.02 3.h; nursing homes; assisted living facilities pursuant to § 429.02 F.S. and ch. 59A-36 F.A.C.; and continuing care retirement communities pursuant to ch. 651 F.S. and ch. 69O-193 F.A.C.; all subject to LDC section 5.05.04. 8.Category II group care facilities and care units subject to section 5.05.04, only when the tenancy of the person or persons under care would not: i. Constitute a direct threat to the health or safety of other individuals; ii. Result in substantial physical damage to the property of others; or iii. Result in the housing of individuals who are engaged in the current, illegal use of or addiction to a controlled substance, as defined in section 802 of title 21, U.S. Code. 9.Recreational facilities intended to serve an existing and/or developing residential community as represented by all of the properties/lots/parcels included in an approved preliminary subdivision plat, or site development plan. The use of said recreational facilities shall be limited to the owners of property or occupants of residential dwellings units and their guests within the area of approved preliminary subdivision plat, or site development plan. 10.Model homes and model sales centers, subject to compliance with all other LDC requirements, to include but not limited to section 5.04.04. 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 629 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) 11.Public schools without an agreement with Collier County, as described in LDC section 5.05.14. Additional standards in LDC section 5.05.14 shall also apply; however, any high school located in this district is subject to a compatibility review as described in LDC section 10.02.03. d. Prohibited animals in residential districts. The following animals are to be considered farm animals and are not permitted to be kept in residential districts except as provided for in zoning district regulations: turkeys, chickens, ducks, geese, pigs, horses, cows, goats, hogs, and the like. The following are those uses permitted eith er by-right, an accessory, or conditional use as proposed in the Community School of Naples CFPUD. PROPOSED USES: TRACT CF PERMITTED USES: No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or in part, for other than the following: A. Principal Uses: 1) Child care centers; 2) Civic and cultural facilities; 3) Museums; 4) Parks and playgrounds, noncommercial recreation facilities, open space uses; 5) Schools, private and parochial schools. This includes Educational Plants for public schools; 6) Social and fraternal organizations; 7) Educational services (groups 8211—8231); 8) Any other principal use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing list of permitted principal uses, as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals (“BZA”) by the process outlined in the Land Development Code (LDC). B. Accessory Uses: Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with the permitted principal uses and structures, including, but not limited to: 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 630 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) 1) Customary accessory uses and structures associated with schools including but not limited to: administrative offices; theaters; auditoriums; pavilions; gymnasiums; residence halls; swimming pools with or without screened enclosures; aquatic centers; ball fields, with or without grandstands/stadium seating; press boxes; practice fields; track and field facilities and field houses, tennis courts, athletic equipment and general storage buildings, and other indoor or outdoor recreation facilities, maintenance and landscape storage; 2) Security gatehouses; 3) Polling place if deemed warranted by the Supervisor of Elections. 4) Water management structures in accordance with Collier County, SFWMD, DEP, and USACOE permitting requirements. II TRACT P PERMITTED USES: No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or in part, for other than the following: A. Principal Uses: 1) Upland preserves; 2). Wetland preserves. B Accessory Uses and Structures: Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with the permitted principal uses and structures, including, but not limited to: 1. Boardwalks, nature trails, shelters, viewing platforms, educational signs, and information kiosks; 2. Water management structures in accordance with Collier County, SFWMD, DEP, and USACOE permitting requirements; 9.A.2.e Packet Pg. 631 Attachment: Attachment D - Application-Backup Materials (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) SIGN POSTTNG TNSTRUCTTONS (CHAPTER 8, COLLIER COUNTY ADMIMSTRATME CODE FOR LAND DEVELOPMENT) [ 2ening sign(s) must be posted by the petitioner or the petitioner's agent on the parcel for a minimum of fifteen (15) oalendar days in advance of the fust public hearing and said srgn(s) must be maintained by the petitioner or the petitioner's agent though the Board of County Qemmissiellsls Hearing. Below are general guidelines foi signs, however thesJ guidclines should not be construed to supersede any requirement of the LDC. For specific sign requiremenL, please refer to the Administrative Code, Chapter 8 E. l. The sign(s) must be erected in firll view of the public, not more than five (5) feet from the nearest steet right-of-way or easeme,nt. 2. The sip(s) must be securely affixed by nails, staples, or other merns to a wood frarne or to a wood panel and then fastened securely to a post, or other structure. The sip may not be affxed to a tree or other foliage,3. The petitioner or the petitioner's ageDt must maintain the sign(s) in place, and rea.lahli condition until the requested action has been heard and a final decision rendered. Ifthe sign(s) is destroyed, lost, or rendered unreadable, tle petitioner or the petitioner's agent must replace the sign(s) NOTE: Af'TER THE SIGN EAS BEEN POSTED, T. TS AtrT'IDAVIT OF' POSTING NOTICE SEOIJLD BE RETTJRNED NO LATER TEAN TEN (10) WORICNG DAYS BETORE THE F'IRST HEARING DATE TO IEE ASSIGNEDPLANNER AFFIDAVIT OF POSTE-IG NOTICE STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OFCOLLIER BEF,RE rrrE TJNDERSTGNED AUrHoRJry, pERsoNALLy A,,EARED Ntn a c K GAI LlNo6< WHO ONOATH SAYS THAT COLTIFR COUNTY LAND pl /o/ l@e 7s/ SIGNATI]RE OF APPLICANT OR AGENT /aat,rt d4uiluro< NAME (TYPEDORPRINTED) t+ STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OFCOLLTER The foregoing instnrment was swom to and zubscribed before ^" U"-rZ Eatgrcg C,,A/J,i^R personallyknown to me or who and who did/did not take anoath. Signature of NotaryPublic il c- My Corrmission Expires : (Stamp with serial number) HE/SHE HAS POSTED PROPERNOTICE AS REQTIIRED BY SECTION IO.O3.OOOF TTIE DEVELOPMENT CODE ON THE PARCEL COVERED TN PETITION NUMBER OA/0 /,t/t/oq2 /,?t( a,( fli6/a STREET ORP.O.BOX IWES Fl q//o ? CIrx srATEzP--: ,J frfiEtwfi&zo Zl,ay identification i#Notrry Pr$lic th ca Flo.i(l. l+o8h MG&ito! lry Commirlion GG 921539 E,S*r.. tU1tr2023 Rev.3/4/20'15 PrintedNameof Notary , 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 632 Attachment: Attachment E - Property advertising hearing signs (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) - -T .I PUBLIC CommunitY HEARI}IG NOTICE School of NaPles GFPUD Amendment to PUD (PUDA) Petition No' 2021 0000731 CCPC: SEPTEMBER 16, 2021 - 9:00 BCG: 0CT0BER 26, 2021 ' 9:00 a' Collier CountY Government Genter, Third Fl a.m. m. o0r W. Harmon Turner uilding ( 3299 East Tamiami Trail, Naples, u Timothy Finn, Princip al PlarrBr: 239'252'4312 lds. F) Ft 34112 4 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 633 Attachment: Attachment E - Property advertising hearing signs (17682 : PL20210000731 Community 'PUBLIC HEARIilG ilOTICE'.::= Gommunity School of Naples CFPUD Amendment to PUD (PUDA) Petition No. Z0Z1 0000791 CCPC: SEPTEMBEH 16, 2021 - g:00 a.m. BCC: 0CT0BER 26, 2021 - g:00 a.m. Collier County Government Center, Third Floor W. Harmon Turner Building (gtOg. F) 3299 East Tamiami Trail, Naples, fi. f+ltZ s Timoth Finn , Ptinci al Planrer: 239 -ZSZ-4312 o -_ fr' ,... ,' 'I 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 634 Attachment: Attachment E - Property advertising hearing signs (17682 : PL20210000731 Community "PUBLIC HEARIilG I{OTICE' Gommunity School of Naples CFPUD Amendment to PUD (PUDA) Petition No. 2021 0000731 CCPC: SEPTEMBER 16,2021 - 9:00 a.m. BCC: OCT0BER 26, 2021 - 9:00 a.m. Collier County Government Genter, Third Floor W. Harmon Turner Building (Bldg. F) I 1299 East Tamiami Trail, Naples, FL 34t12 al Planner: 239-252-4312 eTimothFinn, Princi I I T I E ,l (.....,rJ .. .t" :^lrl , )j \ .: rl r" ) I a T c:.rl" . l. a r' \l .\. 1 * 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 635 Attachment: Attachment E - Property advertising hearing signs (17682 : PL20210000731 Community t* H -PUBLIC HEARII{G ilOTICE" Gommunity School of Naples CFPUD Amendment to PUD (PUDA) Petition No. 2021 0000731 CeFC, SEPTEMBEB 16, 2A2l ' 9:00 a.m. BC0: 0CT0BER 26, 2021 - 9:00 a.m. collier county Government center. Third Floor W. Harmon Turner Building (Bldg. F) 3299 East Tamiami Trail, Naples, FL 34t12 Timoth Finn, Princip al Planror: 239'252'4312 !..jt" olt ; i.r*a t-', I t I t E i 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 636 Attachment: Attachment E - Property advertising hearing signs (17682 : PL20210000731 Community Sign Location #1 Sign Location #2 Sign Location #3 Sign Location #4 9.A.2.f Packet Pg. 637 Attachment: Attachment E - Property advertising hearing signs (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) 20210000731 Community School of Naples X 9.A.2.g Packet Pg. 638 Attachment: Attachment F - Hybrid Hearing Waiver (17682 : PL20210000731 Community School of Naples (PUDA)) 09/16/2021 COLLIER COUNTY Collier County Planning Commission Item Number: 9.A.3 Item Summary: PL20190002849 GMPA -Creekside Subdistrict - An Ordinance of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida amending Ordinance No. 89-05, as amended, the Collier County Growth Management Plan for the unincorporated area of Collier County, Florida, specifically amending the Future Land Use Element and Future Land Use Map and Map Series to create the Creekside Commerce Park East Mixed-Use Subdistrict by changing the designation of property from Urban-Mixed Use District, Urban Residential Subdistrict to Urban-Mixed Use District, Creekside Commerce Park East Mixed-Use Subdistrict to allow 300 multi-family rental dwelling units in addition to non-residential uses. The subject property is located in the southeast quadrant of the intersection of Immokalee Road and Goodlette Frank Road in Section 27, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, consisting of 9.9± acres; and furthermore, directing transmittal of the adopted amendment to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity; providing for severability and providing for an effective date. (Companion Item PL20190002850 PUDA) [Coordinator: Sue Faulkner, Principal Planner] Meeting Date: 09/16/2021 Prepared by: Title: Planner, Principal – Zoning Name: Sue Faulkner 09/02/2021 3:34 PM Submitted by: Title: – Zoning Name: Mike Bosi 09/02/2021 3:34 PM Approved By: Review: Planning Commission Diane Lynch Review item Completed 09/03/2021 3:41 PM Growth Management Operations & Regulatory Management Donna Guitard Review Item Completed 09/07/2021 10:06 AM Zoning Diane Lynch Additional Reviewer Skipped 09/07/2021 9:10 AM Zoning Mike Bosi Zoning Director Review Completed 09/07/2021 11:48 AM Growth Management Department James C French GMD Deputy Dept Head Completed 09/07/2021 5:13 PM Planning Commission Edwin Fryer Meeting Pending 09/16/2021 9:00 AM 9.A.3 Packet Pg. 639 Page | 1 of 11 STAFF REPORT TO: COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT/ZONING DIVISION, COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING SECTION HEARING DATE: September 16, 2021 RE: PETITION PL20190002849/CPSS-2020-04, SMALL-SCALE GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN AMENDMENT (Companion to PUDA- PL20200002850) [ADOPTION HEARING] ELEMENT: FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT (FLUE) OF THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN AGENT/APPLICANT/OWNER(S): Agent: D. Wayne Arnold, AICP Q. Grady Minor and Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey Bonita Springs, FL 34134 Richard D. Yovanovich, Esq Coleman, Yovanovich and Koester, P.A. 4001 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 300 Naples, FL 34103 Applicants: David Genson Creekside East Inc. 2600 Golden Gate Parkway Naples, FL 34105 Owners: Creekside East Inc. 2600 Golden Gate Parkway Naples, FL 34105 9.A.3.a Packet Pg. 640 Attachment: Staff Report PL20190002849with Appendix (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) Page | 2 of 11 GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The subject property comprises ±9.9-acres and is located in the southeast quadrant of Immokalee Road (CR 846) and Goodlette Frank Road (CR 851) in Section 27, Township 48 South, Range 25 East (North Naples Planning Community). REQUESTED ACTION: The applicant requests to amend the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) and the Future Land Use Map and Map Series to create the Creekside Commerce Park East Mixed-Use Subdistrict, which consists of just a few of the overall Creekside Commerce Park CPUD parcels and totals ±9.9 acres. The purpose of this Subdistrict is to allow 300 multi-family rental dwelling units in addition to non-residential uses and furthermore directing transmittal of the adopted amendment to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity. 9.A.3.a Packet Pg. 641 Attachment: Staff Report PL20190002849with Appendix (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) Page | 3 of 11 The proposed amended Future Land Use Element, Creekside Commerce Park East Mixed Use Subdistrict text is as follows: (Single underline text is added, single strike-through text is deleted, and is also reflected in the Ordinance Exhibit A.) EXHIBIT A FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT *** *** *** *** *** Text break *** *** *** *** *** TABLE OF CONTENTS *** *** *** *** *** Text break *** *** *** *** *** Page SUMMARY 1 *** *** *** *** *** Text break *** *** *** *** *** II. *IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY 9 *GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES 9 *** *** *** *** *** Text break *** *** *** *** *** *FUTURE LAND USE MAP SERIES 154 *Future Land Use Map *Mixed Use & Interchange Activity Centers Maps *** *** *** *** *** Text break *** *** *** *** *** *Vanderbilt Beach Commercial Tourist Subdistrict Map *Meridian Village Mixed Use Subdistrict Map *Germain Immokalee Commercial Subdistrict *Greenway – Tamiami Trail East Commercial Subdistrict Map *Bay House Campus Commercial Subdistrict Map *Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed Use Subdistrict Map *Creekside Commerce Park East Mixed Use Subdistrict Map *** *** *** *** *** Text break *** *** *** *** *** Policy 1.5: [beginning page 9] The URBAN Future Land Use Designation shall include Future Land Use Districts and Subdistricts for: 9.A.3.a Packet Pg. 642 Attachment: Staff Report PL20190002849with Appendix (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) Page | 4 of 11 A. URBAN – MIXED USE DISTRICT 1. Urban Residential Subdistrict 2. Urban Residential Fringe Subdistrict *** *** *** *** *** Text break *** *** *** *** *** 19. [RESERVED] 20. Goodlette/Pine Ridge Mixed Use Subdistrict 21. Livingston Road/Veterans Memorial Boulevard East Residential Subdistrict 22. Meridian Village Mixed-Use Subdistrict 23. Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed Use Subdistrict 24. Creekside Commerce Park East Mixed Use Subdistrict *** *** *** *** *** Text break *** *** *** *** *** FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION DESCRIPTION SECTION [beginning page 26] *** *** *** *** *** Text break *** *** *** *** *** I. URBAN DESIGNATION *** *** *** *** *** Text break *** *** *** *** *** Urban designated areas will accommodate the following uses: a. Residential uses including single family, multi-family, duplex, and mobile home. The maximum densities allowed are identified in the Districts, Subdistricts, and Overlays that follow, except as allowed by certain policies under Objective 5. b. Non-residential uses including: 1. Essential services as defined by the most recent Land Development Code; 2. Parks, open space and recreational uses; *** *** *** *** *** Text break *** *** *** *** *** 12. Commercial uses subject to criteria identified in the Urban - Mixed Use District, PUD Neighborhood Village Center Subdistrict, Office and Infill Commercial Subdistrict, Residential Mixed Use Neighborhood Subdistrict, Orange Blossom Mixed-Use Subdistrict, Buckley Mixed Use Subdistrict, Vanderbilt Beach/Collier Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict, Commercial Mixed Use Subdistrict, Goodlette/Pine Ridge Mixed Use Subdistrict, Henderson Creek Mixed Use Subdistrict, Livingston/Radio Road Commercial Infill Subdistrict, Vanderbilt Beach Road Neighborhood Commercial Subdistrict, Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict, Davis ‒ Radio Commercial Subdistrict, Meridian Village Mixed-Use Subdistrict, Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed Use Subdistrict; Creekside Commerce Park East Mixed Use Subdistrict, and, in the Urban Commercial District, Mixed Use Activity Center Subdistrict, Interchange Activity Center Subdistrict, Livingston/Pine Ridge Commercial Infill Subdistrict, Livingston Road/Eatonwood Lane Commercial Infill Subdistrict, Livingston Road 9.A.3.a Packet Pg. 643 Attachment: Staff Report PL20190002849with Appendix (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) Page | 5 of 11 Commercial Infill Subdistrict, Commercial Mixed Use Subdistrict, Livingston Road/Veterans Memorial Boulevard Commercial Infill Subdistrict, Orange Blossom/Airport Crossroads Commercial Subdistrict, Logan Boulevard/Immokalee Road Commercial Infill Subdistrict, East Tamiami Trail Commercial Infill Subdistrict, Seed to Table Commercial Subdistrict, Vanderbilt Beach Commercial Tourist Subdistrict, Germain Immokalee Subdistrict, Greenway – Tamiami Trail East Commercial Subdistrict, Bay House Campus Commercial Subdistrict, in the Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Overlay; and, as allowed by certain FLUE policies. *** *** *** *** *** Text break *** *** *** *** *** A. Urban Mixed Use District [beginning page 28] *** *** *** *** *** Text break *** *** *** *** *** 24. Creekside Commerce Park East Mixed Use Subdistrict [page 54] This Subdistrict consists of 9.9+/- acres and is located on the east side of Goodlette-Frank Road within the Creekside Commerce Park CPUD. The purpose of the subdistrict is to permit development of up to 300 multi-family rental apartments within a portion of the Creekside Commerce Park PUD, in addition to other non-residential uses permitted within the PUD. The Creekside Commerce Park CPUD shall include specific development standards for the proposed multi-family rental units. Development within the Subdistrict shall be subject to the following: a. The maximum multi-family rental apartments permitted within the Subdistrict is 300 dwelling units. *** *** *** *** *** Text break *** *** *** *** *** FUTURE LAND USE MAP SERIES [beginning page 154] Future Land Use Map Activity Center Index Map *** *** *** *** *** Text break *** *** *** *** *** Livingston Road/Veterans Memorial Boulevard East Residential Subdistrict Map Vanderbilt Beach Commercial Tourist Subdistrict Map Ventana Pointe Residential Overlay Map Meridian Village Mixed-Use Subdistrict Map Germain Immokalee Commercial Subdistrict Map Greenway – Tamiami Trail East Commercial Subdistrict Map Bay House Campus Commercial Subdistrict Map Vanderbilt Beach Road Mixed Use Subdistrict Map Creekside Commerce Park East Mixed Use Subdistrict Map PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The purpose of this small-scale Growth Management Plan Amendment is to create the Creekside Commerce Park East Mixed Use Subdistrict, which consists of ±9.9 acres in the southeast quadrant of the intersection of 9.A.3.a Packet Pg. 644 Attachment: Staff Report PL20190002849with Appendix (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) Page | 6 of 11 Immokalee Road (CR 846)and Goodlette-Frank Road (CR851). The subject site is currently undeveloped and is located within the 106-acre Creekside Commerce Park Commercial Planned Unit Development. The purpose of this proposed Subdistrict is to allow 300 multi-family rental dwelling units in addition to non-residential uses and furthermore directing transmittal of the adopted amendment to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity. The applicant also proposes to amend the “Future Land Use Map” and create the “Creekside Commerce Park East Mixed Use Subdistrict Map.” SURROUNDING LAND USE, ZONING AND FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION: Subject Property: The subject property is approximately ±9.9 undeveloped acres. The FLUE designation is Urban, Urban Mixed Use District, Urban Residential Subdistrict Future Land Use Map. The subject site is zoned Creekside Commerce Park Commercial Planned Unit Development (CPUD). Surrounding Land Uses: North: Immediately abutting the north boundary of the subject property is a commercial development with a deli, craft beers, a sub restaurant and physical therapy. The FLUE designates the area to the north Urban, Urban Mixed Use District, Urban Residential Subdistrict on the Future Land Use Map; and zoned Creekside Commerce Park Commercial Planned Unit Development (CPUD). Further to the north is Immokalee Road. To the north of Immokalee Road is NCH North Naples Hospital and more physicians’ offices. East: Immediately adjacent to the east lies the Southwest Professional Health Park, which is group of physicians’ offices and buildings. The FLUE designated properties to the east: Urban, Urban Mixed Use District, Urban Residential Subdistrict and zoned SW Professional Health Park. Further to the east is the Veterans Park Center PUD – also designated Urban, Urban Mixed Use District, Urban Residential Subdistrict and is zoned Veterans Park Center PUD -which provides public service facilities (North Naples Fire Station). South: Immediately to the south is Landmark Hospital and additional physicians’ offices. The FLUE designated properties to the south: Urban, Urban Mixed Use District, Urban Residential Subdistrict and zoned Creekside Commerce Park Commercial Planned Unit Development (CPUD). Further to the south are two storage facilities, a memory care facility, and then is the Collier County Water Reclamation Facility. West: Immediately adjacent to the west of the subject site is Goodlette-Frank Road. Further to the west across Goodlette-Frank Road is the Arthrex campus, which is also within the Creekside Commerce Park CPUD. This Arthrex site is the world headquarters for Arthrex and which contains a variety of uses such as the Arthrex Medical Center, classrooms for surgeons, a private hotel for clients, development laboratories and facilities for new products, and physical therapy facilities. STAFF ANALYSIS: Background and Considerations: The subject site is 9.9 acres designated: Urban, Urban Mixed Use District, Urban Residential Subdistrict; and zoned Creekside Commerce Park Commercial Planned Unit Development (CPUD). The subject site is tucked around a variety of commercial and industrial uses such as physician offices, health care facilities, memory care facility, retail, and storage/warehousing along Creekside Blvd. The 106-acre Creekside Commerce Park Commercial Planned Unit Development does not currently contain a residential component anywhere within the 9.A.3.a Packet Pg. 645 Attachment: Staff Report PL20190002849with Appendix (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) Page | 7 of 11 CPUD. The applicant wishes to amend the CPUD and create a new Subdistrict to allow residential to be located only in the 9.9-acre Creekside Commerce Park East Mixed Use Subdistrict, which is approximately 1/10 the acreage of the entire CPUD. The subject site is located within one of the most vibrant and successful urban development areas in Collier County. Arthrex has chosen this location to be the home of its world headquarters, investing in new innovative architecture and in building supportive relationships with the Naples community. The NCH North Naples Hospital has expanded and grown over the years along with Collier County and supports the Naples Community with its many outreach programs. Creekside Commerce Park CPUD offers a wide variety of retail, medical office and care facilities, medical offices, government facilities, financial institutions, industrial uses, and much more. Arthrex and NCH North Hospital both wholeheartedly support this project with housing located within walking distance for their employees. By adding a residential component to this location, it completes “Creekside” to be one of the most active mixed use areas in the County. The applicant is proposing a maximum of 300 multi-family rental apartments within the Subdistrict in addition to other non-residential uses already permitted with the Creekside Commerce Park Commercial Planned Unit Development. The project area is designated Urban, Urban Mixed Use District, Urban Residential Subdistrict. The Future Land Use Element of the Growth Management Plan (GMP) states, “Urban designated areas on the Future Land Use Map include two general portions of Collier County: areas with the greatest residential densities, and areas in close proximity, which have or are projected to receive future urban support facilities and services. It is intended that Urban designated areas accommodate the majority of population growth and that new intensive land uses be located within them. Accordingly, the Urban area will accommodate residential uses and a variety of non-residential uses.” Within the Collier County Urban Designated Areas, a base density of 4 residential dwelling units per gross acre may be allowed, according to the Future Land Use Element. This base level of density may be adjusted depending upon the location and characteristics of the project. The FLUE’s Density Rating System only applies to residential dwelling units in specific areas of the GMP. A bonus of up to a maximum of 16 dwelling units per acre may be added through the Density Rating System. These bonus dwelling units may be distributed over the entire project. The project must be compatible with surrounding land uses. The applicant is requesting 300 residential dwelling units, which equals a density of 30.3 DUs/A (300DUs /9.9A = 30.3DU/A). Because this project is proposed for market rate housing and not affordable housing, the project might only be eligible for a maximum of 16 DUs/A under the Density Rating System. The density of approximately 30DUs per acre is being proposed by the applicant under the Creekside Commerce Park CPUD Zoning District. This proposed density could never achieve 30 DUs/acre under the current Density Rating System. Recently, staff, the Collier County Planning Commission, and the Collier County Board of County Commissioners have all been asked to review and consider petitions where the requested density exceeds the FLUE’s maximum density of 16 DUs/acre. As Collier County has grown in population in recent times, staff has recognized that four main facts are pushing the density envelope – 1) Diminishing supply of Undeveloped Urban land and land that can be easily redeveloped; 2) Desire of developers to maximize the uses on the remaining urban lands; 3) Desire of consumers to live near the greatest number of goods and services; and 4) government wants to minimize the utilization of existing public infrastructure (for example: reduce vehicle miles traveled to gain the most benefit) and reduce the need for new public infrastructure to be provided. 9.A.3.a Packet Pg. 646 Attachment: Staff Report PL20190002849with Appendix (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) Page | 8 of 11 Staff has analyzed the Creekside Subdistrict project from a little different perspective. Staff used the Collier Interactive Growth Model (CIGM) to help better understand the Creekside project. The Model showed that locating housing in Creekside will provide a very high quality of life. Some of the details about the model and results obtained may be viewed in the appendix to this staff report. (see Appendix). The model results also show that the employment opportunities within a 2-mile radius are very substantial. The model estimated there could be as many as 11,500 commercial and industrial jobs located within a 2-mile radius of the proposed Creekside Commerce Park East Mixed Use Subdistrict. These are two very good reasons to recommend locating multi- family rental apartments in Creekside. As mentioned previously, both Arthrex and NCH North Collier Hospital support this project that could o ffer housing for their employees to be within walking distance. This project could meet many demands for an urban living lifestyle - one with nearby shopping and dining conveniences, work, and a variety of services. The Delnor-Wiggins Pass State Park, the Naples Performance Center – Artis, and many other types of entertainment would also be located close by. Compatibility: The FLUE states that the urbanized area is to provide for higher densities in an area with fewer natural resource constraints and where existing and planned public facilities are concentrated. The Urban designated areas accommodate the majority of population growth with residential uses and a variety of non -residential uses. The proposed 300 multi-family rental apartments are compatible with the mix of uses that currently are approved within the Creekside CPUD. Although the proposed 300 DUs is at a very high density, the actual impact of such a density would be absorbed with the surrounding uses (such as medical offices), many of which operate Monday – Friday 8AM -5PM. Justifications for Proposed Amendment: The justification for the proposed small-scale Growth Management Plan Amendment is to create a new subdistrict that will allow for a residential development with a higher density nestled in a setting that provides both medical, retail, financial, and an assortment of entertainment opportunities and natural settings within a close proximity to the housing. Identification and Analysis of the Pertinent Small Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment Criteria in Florida Statutes Chapter 163.3187: Process for adoption of small scale comprehensive plan amendment. 1) A small scale development amendment may be adopted under the following conditions: (a) The proposed amendment involves a use of 50 acres or fewer and: [The subject site comprises ±9.9 acres.] (b) The proposed amendment does not involve a text change to the goals, policies, and objectives of the local government’s comprehensive plan, but only proposes a land use change to the future land use map for a site-specific small scale development activity. However, text changes that relate directly to, and are adopted simultaneously with, the small scale future land use map amendment shall be permissible under this section. [This amendment does include a text change to the Comprehensive Plan and those text changes are directly related to the proposed Future Land Use Map amendment.] (c) The property that is the subject of the proposed amendment is not located within an area of critical 9.A.3.a Packet Pg. 647 Attachment: Staff Report PL20190002849with Appendix (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) Page | 9 of 11 state concern, unless the project subject to the proposed amendment involves the construction of affordable housing units meeting the criteria of s. 420.0004(3), and is located within an area of critical state concern designated by s. 380.0552 or by the Administration Commission pursuant to s. 380.05(1). [The subject property is not located within an Area of Critical State Concern.] (2) Small scale development amendments adopted pursuant to this section require only one public hearing before the governing board, which shall be an adoption hearing as described in s. 163.3184(11). [This project will be heard with only one public adoption hearing.] (3) If the small scale development amendment involves a site within a rural area of opportunity as defined under s. 288.0656(2)(d) for the duration of such designation, the acreage limit listed in subsection (1) shall be increased by 100 percent. The local government approving the small scale plan amendment shall certify to the state land planning agency that the plan amendment furthers the economic objectives set forth in the executive order issued under s. 288.0656(7), and the property subject to the plan amendment shall undergo public review to ensure that all concurrency requirements and federal, state, and local environmental permit requirements are met. [This amendment does not involve a site within a rural area of opportunity.] (4) Comprehensive plans may only be amended in such a way as to preserve the internal consistency of the plan pursuant to s. 163.3177. Corrections, updates, or modifications of current costs which were set out as part of the comprehensive plan shall not, for the purposes of this act, be deemed to be amendments. [This amendment preserves the internal consistency of the plan and is not a correction, update, or modification of current costs which were set out as part of the comprehensive plan.] Environmental Impacts and Historical and Archaeological Impacts: Craig Brown, Senior Environmental Specialist, completed his review and approved this petition, without any conditions, on 11/16/2020. The subject property is 9.9 acres. The acreage of native vegetation on site has been field verified by staff during review of the Planned Unit Development (PUD) for the project. The project is currently zoned CPUD. The proposed GMP amendment will not affect the requirements of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME) of the GMP. Native vegetation on site will be retained in accordance with the requirements of CCME Policy 6.1.1, Policy 7.1.1 and section 3.05.07 of the LDC. Environmental Services staff recommends approval. No EAC required. Public Facilities Impacts: Eric Fey, Senior Project Manager with Collier County Public Utilities Engineering & Project Management Division, approved this petition on February 2, 2021. This site is serviced with public utilities and serviced by County potable water and wastewater treatment facilities. The 300-unit apartment complex will not create any LOS issues in the 5-year planning horizon. This project will have no detrimental impact on the potable water system and capacity is available in Collier County. The project will have no detrimental impact on the wastewater treatment system. Transportation Impacts: Michael Sawyer, Project Manager with Collier County Transportation Planning, Capital Projects Ping/Impact Fees/Program Management, completed his review and approved this petition, without any conditions, on November 9.A.3.a Packet Pg. 648 Attachment: Staff Report PL20190002849with Appendix (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) Page | 10 of 11 16, 2020. Transportation Element: In evaluating this project, staff reviewed the applicant’s June 18, 2020 TIS and revised PUD Document for consistency with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the Growth Management Plan (GMP). Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the GMP states: “The County Commission shall review all rezone petitions, SRA designation applications, conditional use petitions, and proposed amendments to the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) affecting the overall countywide density or intensity of permissible development, with consideration of their impact on the overall County transportation system, and shall not approve any petition or application that would di rectly access a deficient roadway segment as identified in the current AUIR or if it impacts an adjacent roadway segment that is deficient as identified in the current AUIR, or which significantly impacts a roadway segment or adjacent roadway segment that is currently operating and/or is projected to operate below an adopted Level of Service Standard within the five year AUIR planning period, unless specific mitigating stipulations are also approved. A petition or application has significant impacts if the traffic impact statement reveals that any of the following occur: a. For links (roadway segments) directly accessed by the project where project traffic is equal to or exceeds 2% of the adopted LOS standard service volume: b. For links adjacent to links directly accessed by the project where project traffic is equal to or exceeds 2% of the adopted LOS standard service volume; and c. For all other links the project traffic is considered to be significant up to the point where it is equal to or exceeds 3% of the adopted LOS standard service volume. Mitigating stipulations shall be based upon a mitigation plan prepared by the applicant and submitted as part of the traffic impact statement that addresses the project’s significant impacts on all roadways.” Staff finding: According to the TIS and revised PUD document the proposed change will allow up to 300 multi - family residential units within the Creekside Commerce Park development. The TIS for this request includes scenario’s for both the currently approved PUD uses and those proposed with this amendment request. The scenarios indicate that there will be no net increase or decrease in the number of trips generated by this development. Staff further notes that the current trip cap in section 2.16.L of the PUD document is not changing, thereby retaining the same maximum number of trips allowed by this development. Based on the TIS and the revised PUD, the subject petition request can be found consistent with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the Growth Management Plan because there are no additional traffic impacts resulting from the proposed changes. Transportation Review: Transportation Planning staff has reviewed the petition for compliance with the GMP and the LDC and recommends approval. NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING (NIM) SYNOPSIS: A Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM), as required by Land Development Code (LDC) Section 10.03.05 A, was duly advertised, noticed, and was scheduled on Wednesday, January 6, 2021, at 5:30 pm and located at Saint Monica’s Episcopal Church, 7070 Immokalee Road, Naples, FL 34119. This NIM was advertised, noticed, and scheduled to be held jointly for this small scale GMP amendment and the companion Planned Unit Development Amendment (PUDA) petition. No members of the public were present or registered through Zoom; therefore, the meeting was not held. [synopsis prepared by Sue Faulkner, Principal Planner, Comprehensive Planning Section] 9.A.3.a Packet Pg. 649 Attachment: Staff Report PL20190002849with Appendix (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) Page | 11 of 11 PUBLIC CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED BY STAFF: Comprehensive Planning staff received two letters of support for this project. The first letter dated March 9, 2021 is from Paul Hiltz, FACHE, President and CEO with NCH Healthcare System . He stated that the proximity to the NCH North Naples Hospital and restaurants/retail in the area will make it an attractive place for future employees to live, work, and play within walking distance. The second letter dated March 10, 2021 is from Reinhold Schmieding, Founder and President of Arthrex, Inc. He stated that this project is an opportunity to provide rental housing within walking distance to our world headquarters. Both of these letters may be found in your agenda packet (at the end of the Appendix). FINDING AND CONCLUSIONS: • The reason for this GMPA and companion PUDA zoning petition is to allow up to 300 multi- family rental apartments by creating a new subdistrict. • The surrounding area will offer over 11,500 jobs, many of which are technical high-quality jobs. • The surrounding area will offer many opportunities for shopping and dining out within a short distance of the project; therefore, reducing vehicle miles traveled by the residents of this project. • There are no adverse environmental impacts as a result of this petition. • No historic or archaeological sites are affected by this amendment. • There are no utility-related concerns as a result of this petition. • There are no concerns for impacts upon other public infrastructure. • There are no transportation concerns as a result of this petition. • The use is generally compatible with surrounding development based upon the high-level review conducted for a GMP amendment. LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: This Staff Report was reviewed by the County Attorney’s Office on September 2, 2021. The criteria for GMP amendments to the Future Land Use Element are in Sections 163.3177(1)(f) and 163.3177(6)(a)2, Florida Statutes. The criteria for changes to the Future Land Use Map is in Section 163.3177(6)(a)8, Florida Statutes [HFAC] STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Collier County Planning Commission forward Petition PL20190002849/CPSS-2020- 04 to the Board of County Commissioners with a recommendation to approve (adopt) and transmit to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity. Prepared by: Sue Faulkner, Principal Planner, Comprehensive Planning Section, Zoning Division 9.A.3.a Packet Pg. 650 Attachment: Staff Report PL20190002849with Appendix (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) Page | 1 of 7 Creekside Commerce Park East Mixed Use Subdistrict (GMPA) PL20190002849 8-29-21 APPENDIX FOR STAFF REPORT 1. Location 2. Collier Interactive Growth Model (CIGM) Analysis 3. Correspondence *** *** *** *** *** Text break *** *** *** *** *** 1. LOCATION The proposed GMPA Subdistrict site is proposed as a portion of the previously approved and recently amended 106-acre Creekside Commerce Park Commercial Planned Unit Development (CPUD) via Ordinance #18 -19. Below is a site plan of the entire Creekside CPUD. The CPUD is a zoning district that allows land uses that consist of predominately industrial, warehouse, wholesale, financial institutions, business and office uses, with limited amounts of retail uses. Limited residential uses are being considered to be added. 9.A.3.a Packet Pg. 651 Attachment: Staff Report PL20190002849with Appendix (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) Page | 2 of 7 In order to help understand where the proposed Subdistrict lies within the Creekside CPUD, below is the inset map that shows the location of the Creekside Commerce Park East Mixed Use Subdistrict: 2. COLLIER INTERACTIVE GROWTH MODEL (CIGM) ANALYSIS Staff used the Collier Interactive Growth Model (CIGM) Planning Tool created to do a land use analysis for the proposed project. This model was developed by Metro Forecasting Models specifically to allow staff to analyze a variety of existing land uses and how they could interact with a new proposed project. One of the first things staff evaluated was the “Quality of Life” that would be available to tenants choosing to live in the Creekside Commerce Park East Mixed Use Subdistrict. This model component measures the proximity to 9.A.3.a Packet Pg. 652 Attachment: Staff Report PL20190002849with Appendix (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) Page | 3 of 7 different factors that are usually considered when evaluating “Quality of Life”, such as travel time for fire, EMS, and police protection, travel time to a shopping center, or to a school. The CIGM is based on official Traffic Analysis Zones (TAZs) which are identified by the Florida Department of Transportation for statewide transportation plans and used for macroscopic traffic analysis . TAZs are very small areas – much smaller than census tracts, blocks or groups. The small TAZ areas allow analysis to be done for an individual project of almost any size. The CIGM contains data (some of which is based on Federal Census data and some data is provided by Collier County for approved land uses) that is geographically assigned to these individual TAZ areas. The proposed Creekside Subdistrict is located in TAZ #2290 (outlined on the map in light blue below.) Output from the CIGM (created and maintained by Metro Forecasting Models). David Farmer from Metro Forecasting Models assisted staff is working with the CIGM. You can see from the output for TAZ 2290 (above) that this location offers a wide range of factors that make up a high quality of Life. 9.A.3.a Packet Pg. 653 Attachment: Staff Report PL20190002849with Appendix (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) Page | 4 of 7 The next thing staff evaluated was how much commercial and industrial square feet are located within a 2-mile radius. Staff set up a 2-mile buffer with the CIGM. Below is the output from all of the TAZs within the 2-mile buffer. BL stands for Baseline for the year data was gathered (late 2019/early 2020). BO is Buildout and the year varies by location and ability to add more housing units. The BO year for Creekside is 2030-2035. 9.A.3.a Packet Pg. 654 Attachment: Staff Report PL20190002849with Appendix (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) Page | 5 of 7 The table above shows that there are approximately 11,500 industrial and commercial jobs located within a 2-mile radius of the marker staff placed in TAZ 2290. This approximation of the number of jobs located within the 2-mile buffer was calculated using the total of existing commercial square feet (BL) and divided by a rule of thumb that says, “there is approximately one job for every 600 square feet of commercial” plus the total of existing industrial square feet (BL) and divided by a rule of thumb that says, “there is one job for every 750 square feet of industrial.” This is not an exact answer to the total number of jobs, but does help obtain an estimate. 3. CORRESPONDENCE Comprehensive Planning staff received two letters of support for this project. The first letter dated March 9, 2021 is from Paul Hiltz, FACHE, President and CEO with NCH Healthcare System. He stated that the proximity to the NCH North Naples Hospital and restaurants/retail in the area will make it an attractive place for future employees to live, work, and play within walking distance. The second letter dated March 10, 2021 is from Reinhold Schmieding, Founder and President of Arthrex, Inc. He stated that this project is an opportunity to provide rental housing within walking distance to our world headquarters. 9.A.3.a Packet Pg. 655 Attachment: Staff Report PL20190002849with Appendix (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) 9.A.3.a Packet Pg. 656 Attachment: Staff Report PL20190002849with Appendix (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) 9.A.3.a Packet Pg. 657 Attachment: Staff Report PL20190002849with Appendix (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) 9.A.3.b Packet Pg. 658 Attachment: Ordinance - 082321 (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) 9.A.3.b Packet Pg. 659 Attachment: Ordinance - 082321 (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) 9.A.3.b Packet Pg. 660 Attachment: Ordinance - 082321 (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) 9.A.3.b Packet Pg. 661 Attachment: Ordinance - 082321 (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) 9.A.3.b Packet Pg. 662 Attachment: Ordinance - 082321 (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) 9.A.3.b Packet Pg. 663 Attachment: Ordinance - 082321 (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) 9.A.3.b Packet Pg. 664 Attachment: Ordinance - 082321 (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) 9.A.3.b Packet Pg. 665 Attachment: Ordinance - 082321 (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, FL 34134  239-947-1144  engineering@gradyminor.com  www.gradyminor.com Creekside Commerce Park East Mixed Use Subdistrict (PL20190002849) Application and Supporting Documents Sept. 16, 2021 CCPC Hearing 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 666 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. Ph. 239-947-1144 Fax. 239-947-0375 3800 Via Del Rey EB 0005151 LB 0005151 LC 26000266 Bonita Springs, FL 34134 www.gradyminor.com June 22, 2020 Ms. Anita Jenkins, AICP, Community Planning Mgr. GMP Restudy Collier County Growth Management Division/ Planning and Regulation Land Development Services Department Comprehensive Planning Section 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 RE: Creekside Commerce Park East Mixed Use Subdistrict – PL20190002849, Submittal 1 Dear Ms. Jenkins: A Collier County Small-Scale Growth Management Plan Amendment (GMPA) application for properties located at the Southeast quadrant of Immokalee Road and Goodlette-Frank Road is being filed electronically for review. This application proposes to establish the Creekside Commerce Park East Residential Subdistrict consisting of 9.9 +/- acres currently zoned Creekside Commerce Park CPUD, which have been platted as Tracts “P-1”, “2”, “3”, and “5” in Plat Book 54, Pages 84 & 85. The new subdistrict will provide for a maximum of 300 multi-family rental units. The GMPA is supported with a companion PUD amendment (PL20190002850), which establishes the specific development standards for the residential land use and identifies the residential area on the conceptual PUD Master Plan. Please feel free to contact Rich Yovanovich at 435-3535 or me should you have any questions. Sincerely, D. Wayne Arnold, AICP c: Creekside East, Inc. Richard D. Yovanovich GradyMinor File (BCCPUD-19) 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 667 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) 1 APPLICATION NUMBER: PL20190002849 DATE RECEIVED: ______________________________ PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE DATE: January 16, 2020______________________________________ This application, with all required supplemental data and information, must be completed and accompanied by the appropriate fee, and returned to the Growth Management Department 239-252- 2400, Zoning Division, Comprehensive Planning Section, 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida 34104. The application is to be reviewed by staff for sufficiency within 30 calendar days following the filing deadline. The applicant will be notified, in writing, of the sufficiency determination. If insufficient, the applicant will have 30 days to remedy the deficiencies. For additional information on the processing of the application, see Resolution 12-234. If you have any questions, please contact the Comprehensive Planning Section at 239-252-2400. SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS I. GENERAL INFOMRATION A. Name of Applicant: David Genson Company: Creekside East Inc. Address: 2600 Golden Gate Pkwy City: Naples State: Florida Zip Code: 34105 Phone Number: 239-262-2600 Fax Number: ________________________________ Email Address: dgenson@barroncollier.com B. Name of Agent* D. Wayne Arnold, AICP • THIS WILL BE THE PERSON CONTACTED FOR ALL BUSINESS RELATED TO THE PETITION. Company: Q. Grady Minor and Associates, P.A. Address: 3800 Via Del Rey City: Bonita Springs State: Florida Zip Code: 34134 Phone Number: 239-947-1144 Fax Number: ___________________________ Email Address: warnold@gradyminor.com B1. Name of Agent* Richard D. Yovanovich • THIS WILL BE THE PERSON CONTACTED FOR ALL BUSINESS RELATED TO THE PETITION. Company: Coleman, Yovanovich and Koester, P.A. Address: The Northern Trust Building, 4001 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 300 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 668 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) 2 City: Naples State: Florida Zip Code: 34103 Phone Number: 239-435-3535 Fax Number: ___________________________ Email Address: ryovanovich@cyklawfirm.com C. Name of Owner (s) of Record: Creekside East Inc. Address: 2600 Golden Gate Pkwy City: Naples State: Florida Zip Code: 34105 Phone Number: 239-262-2600 Fax Number: ______________________________ Email Address: dgenson@barroncollier.com D. Name, Company, Address and Qualifications of all consultants and other professionals providing information contained in this application, as well as Qualifications of the Agent identified above. See Exhibit I.D. II. Disclosure of Interest Information: A. If the property is owned fee simple by an INDIVIDUAL, Tenancy by the entirety, tenancy in common, or joint tenancy, list all parties with an ownership interest as well as the percentage of such interest. (Use additional sheets if necessary). Name and Address Percentage of Ownership Not Applicable _________________________ __________________________________________ _________________________ B. If the property is owned by a CORPORATION, list the officers and stockholders and the percentage of stock owned by each. Name and Address Percentage of Stock Creekside East, Inc., 2600 Golden Gate Pkwy 100% R. Blakeslee Gable, President/Director Lamar G. Villere, Director Bradley A. Boaz, V/S/T/RA Katherine G. Sproul, Director Barron III Collier, C/D Jeff Sonalia, Vice President Douglas E. Baird, Vice President Brian Goguen, Vice President Juliet A. Sproul, Director 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 669 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) 3 C. If the property is in the name of a TRUSTEE, list the beneficiaries of the trust with the percentage of interest. Name and Address Percentage of Interest Not Applicable _________________________ _____________________________________ _________________________ D. If the property is in the name of a GENERAL or LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, list the name of the general and/or limited partners. Name and Address Percentage of Ownership Not Applicable _________________________ __________________________________________ _________________________ E. If there is a CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE, with an individual or individuals, a Corporation, Trustee, or a Partnership, list the names of the contract purchasers below, including the officers, stockholders, beneficiaries, or partners. Name and Address Percentage of Ownership Not Applicable _________________________ __________________________________________ _________________________ Date of Contract: __________________ F. If any contingency clause or contract terms involve additional parties, list all individuals or officers, if a corporation, partnership, or trust. Name and Address ________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________ G. Date subject property acquired (2004) leased ( ):________Term of lease: ______yrs./mos. If, Petitioner has option to buy, indicate date of option: ______________ and date option terminates: ______________, or anticipated closing: _______________________. NOTE: H. Should any changes of ownership or changes in contracts for purchase occur subsequent to the date of application, but prior to the date of the final public hearing, it is the responsibility of the applicant, or agent on his behalf, to submit a supplemental disclosure of interest form. 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 670 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) 4 III. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY: A. PARCEL I.D. NUMBER: 23991198024, 23991198040, 29331180023, 29331180049, 29331180544, 29331180609, 29331181103, 29331181129, 29333000046 B. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: See Exhibit III.B – Sketch and Legal C. GENERAL LOCATION: Southeast quadrant of Goodlette-Frank Road and Immokalee Road D. Section: 27 Township: 48 Range: 25 E. PLANNING COMMUNITY: North Naples F. TAZ: 115 G. SIZE IN ACRES: 9.9± acres H. ZONING: CPUD (Creekside Commerce Park) I. FUTURE LAND USE MAP DESIGNATION(S): Urban Designation, Mixed Use District, Urban Residential Subdistrict J. SURROUNDING LAND USE PATTERN: Commercial, office, retail and medical – Exhibit V.A and V.B IV. TYPE OF REQUEST: A. GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN ELEMENT (S) TO BE AMENDED: ______ Housing Element ______ Recreation/Open Space ______ Traffic Circulation Sub-Element ______ Mass Transit Sub-Element ______ Aviation Sub-Element ______ Potable Water Sub-Element ______ Sanitary Sewer Sub-Element ______ NGWAR Sub-Element ______ Solid Waste Sub-Element ______ Drainage Sub-Element ______ Capital Improvement Element ______ CCME Element X Future Land Use Element Golden Gate Master Plan ______ Immokalee Master Plan B. AMEND PAGE (S): vi, 10, 50 and 149 OF THE: Future Land Use ELEMENT AS FOLLOWS: (Use Strike-through to identify language to be deleted; Use Underline to identify language to be added). Attach additional pages if necessary: See Exhibit IV.B C. AMEND FUTURE LAND USE MAP(S) DESIGNATION FROM Urban Designation, Mixed Use District, Urban Residential Subdistrict TO Creekside Commerce Park East Mixed Use Subdistrict. Exhibit IV.C D. AMEND OTHER MAP(S) AND EXHIBITS AS FOLLOWS: (Name & Page #)N.A. E. DESCRIBE ADDITIONAL CHANGES REQUESTED: Create Creekside Commerce Park Mixed Use Subdistrict Inset Map (page #’s are not shown on existing maps in the Comprehensive Plan). Exhibit IV.E 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 671 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) 5 V. REQUIRED INFORMATION: NOTE: ALL AERIALS MUST BE AT A SCALE OF NO SMALLER THAN I”=400’. At least one copy reduced to 8- 1/2 x 11 shall be provided of all aerials and/or maps. A. LAND USE Exhibit V.A Provide general location map showing surrounding developments (PUD, DRI’s, existing zoning) with subject property outlined. Exhibit V.A Provide most recent aerial of site showing subject boundaries, source, and date. Exhibit V.A Provide a map and summary table of existing land use and zoning within a radius of 300 feet from boundaries of subject property. B. FUTURE LAND USE AND DESIGNATION Exhibit V.B Provide map of existing Future Land Use Designation(s) of subject property and adjacent lands, with acreage totals for each land use designation on the subject property. C. ENVIRONMENTAL Exhibit V.C Provide most recent aerial and summary table of acreage of native habitats and soils occurring on site. HABITAT IDENTIFICATION MUST BE CONSISTENT WITH THE FDOT-FLORIDA LAND USE, COVER AND FORMS CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM (FLUCCS CODE). NOTE: THIS MAY BE INDICATED ON SAME AERIAL AS THE LAND USE AERIAL IN “A” ABOVE. Exhibit V.C Provide a summary table of Federal (US Fish & Wildlife Service) and State (Florida Game & Freshwater Fish Commission) listed plant and animal species known to occur on the site and/or known to inhabit biological communities similar to the site (e.g. panther or black bear range, avian rookery, bird migratory route, etc.) Identify historic and/or archaeological sites on the subject property. D. GROWTH MANAGEMENT Reference , F.A.C. and Collier County’s Capital Improvements Element Policy 1.1.2 (Copies attached). 1. INSERT “Y” FOR YES OR “N” FOR NO IN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING: N Is the proposed amendment located in an Area of Critical State Concern? (Reference , F.A.C.). IF so, identify area located in ACSC. N Is the proposed amendment directly related to a proposed Development of Regional Impact pursuant to Chapter 380 F.S.? (Reference , F.A.C.) Y/Y, Exhibit V.D Is the proposed amendment directly related to a proposed Small Scale Development Activity pursuant to Subsection 163.3187 (1)(c), F.S.? Does the proposed amendment create a significant impact in population which is defined as a potential increase in County-wide population by more than 5% of population projections? (Reference Capital Improvement Element Policy 1.1.2). If yes, indicate mitigation measures being proposed in conjunction with the proposed amendment. Y/Y - Exhibit V.D1 Does the proposed land use cause an increase in density and/or intensity 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 672 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) 6 to the uses permitted in a specific land use designation and district identified (commercial, industrial, etc.) or is the proposed land use a new land use designation or district? (Reference F.A.C.). If so, provide data and analysis to support the suitability of land for the proposed use, and of environmentally sensitive land, ground water and natural resources. (Reference , F.A.C.) E. PUBLIC FACILITIES 1. Provide the existing Level of Service Standard (LOS) and document the impact the proposed change will have on the following public facilities: Exhibit V.E Potable Water Exhibit V.E Sanitary Sewer Exhibit V.E1 Arterial & Collector Roads; Name specific road and LOS Immokalee Road Goodlette-Frank Road Exhibit V.E Drainage Exhibit V.E Solid Waste Exhibit V.E Parks: Community and Regional If the proposed amendment involves an increase in residential density, or an increase in intensity for commercial and/or industrial development that would cause the LOS for public facilities to fall below the adopted LOS, indicate mitigation measures being proposed in conjunction with the proposed amendment. (Reference Capital Improvement Element Objective 1 and Policies) 2. Exhibit V.E2 Provide a map showing the location of existing services and public facilities that will serve the subject property (i.e. water, sewer, fire protection, police protection, schools and emergency medical services. 3. Exhibit V.E Document proposed services and public facilities, identify provider, and describe the effect the proposed change will have on schools, fire protection and emergency medical services. F. OTHER Identify the following areas relating to the subject property: AE-9 Flood zone based on Flood Insurance Rate Map data (FIRM). N.A. Location of wellfields and cones of influence, if applicable. (Identified on Collier County Zoning Maps) N.A. Coastal High Hazard Area, if applicable N.A. High Noise Contours (65 LDN or higher) surrounding the Naples Airport, if applicable (identified on Collier County Zoning Maps). G. SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION N.A $16,700.00 non-refundable filing fee made payable to the Board of County Commissioners due at time of submittal. (Plus, proportionate share of advertising costs) 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 673 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) 7 Provided $9,000.00 non-refundable filing fee for a Small-Scale Amendment made payable to the Board of County Commissioners due at time of submittal. (Plus, proportionate share of advertising costs) Exhibit V.G3 Proof of ownership (copy of deed) Exhibit V.G4 Notarized Letter of Authorization if Agent is not the Owner (See attached form) Exhibit V.G5 Addressing Checklist Exhibit V.G6 Preapplication Meeting Notes * If you have held a pre-application meeting within 9 months prior to submitted date and paid the pre-application fee of $500.00 at the meeting, deduct that amount from the above application fee amount when submitting your application. All pre-application fees are included in the total application submittal fee if petition submitted within 9 months of pre-application meeting date. Otherwise the overage will be applied to future proportionate share advertising costs. * Maps shall include: North arrow, name and location of principal roadways and shall be at a scale of 1”=400’ or at a scale as determined during the pre-application meeting. *All attachments should be consistently referenced as attachments or exhibits, and should be labelled to correlate to the application form, e.g. “Exhibit I.D.” * Planning Community, TAZ map, Traffic Analysis Zone map, Zoning maps, and Future Land Use Maps. Some maps are available on the Zoning Division website depicting information herein: Zoning Services Section: _________________ Comprehensive Planning Section: _______________________ THIS HAS CHANGED SINCE DCA BECAME DEO. SEE GMP PAEG 2011 UPDATES: https://www.colliercountyfl.gov/your-government/divisions-s-z/zoning-division/zoning-services- section/land-use-commission-district-maps REMAINDER OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 674 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) May 26, 2020 Page 1 of 2 BCCPUD-19 Exhibit ID.docx Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, FL 34134  239-947-1144  engineering@gradyminor.com  www.gradyminor.com Creekside Commerce Park East Mixed Use Subdistrict (PL20190002849) Exhibit I.D Professional Consultants Planning/Project Management: D. Wayne Arnold, AICP Q. Grady Minor and Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey Bonita Springs, FL 34134 239.947.1144 warnold@gradyminor.com Richard D. Yovanovich, Esq Coleman, Yovanovich and Koester, P.A. 4001 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 300 Naples, FL 34103 239.435.3535 ryovanovich@cyklawfirm.com Transportation: Norman J. Trebilcock, AICP, PE Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA 1205 Piper Boulevard, Suite 202 Naples, FL 34110 239-566-9551 ntrebilcock@trebilcock.biz Environmental: Tim Hall Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc. Marine & Environmental Consulting 3584 Exchange Ave. Naples, FL. 34104-3732 Phone: (239) 643-0166 Market Analysis: Russ Weyer President Real Estate Econometrics, Inc. 707 Orchid Drive, Suite 100 Naples, FL 34102 239-269-1341 Rweyer@ree-i.com 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 675 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) Page 2 of 2 APPENDIX 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 676 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) D. Wayne Arnold, AICP Principal, Director of Planning Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. Civil Engineers  Surveyors  Land Planners  Landscape Architects Education  Master of Urban Planning, University of Kansas, Lawrence  Bachelor of Science, Urban and Regional Planning/Geography, Missouri State University Professional Registrations/ Affiliations  American Institute of Certified Planners (AICP)  American Planning Association (APA)  Leadership Collier, Class of 2000  Bonita Springs Chamber of Commerce Government Affairs Committee  Collier County Jr. Deputy League, Inc., Board of Directors President  City of Naples Planning Advisory Board 2010-2014 Mr. Arnold is a Principal and co-owner of the firm and serves as the Secretary/Treasurer and Director of Planning. As Director of Planning, Mr. Arnold is responsible for and oversees services related to plan amendments, property re-zonings, expert witness testimony, ROW Acquisition, public participation facilitation, and project management. Mr. Arnold previously served as the Planning Services Director at Collier County, where he oversaw the County’s zoning, comprehensive planning, engineering, platting and Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) functions. Mr. Arnold also has prior Florida planning experience with Palm Beach County Government and the South Florida Water Management District. Mr. Arnold has been accepted as an expert in land planning matters in local and state proceedings. RELEVANT PROJECTS  Collier County Growth Management Plan  Immokalee Airport Master Plan  Collier County Land Development Code  Logan Boulevard Right-of-Way Acquisition Planning Analysis  U.S. 41 Right-of-Way Expansion Planning Analysis  Copeland Zoning Overlay  Collier County Government Center Development of Regional Impact (DRI)  Pine Ridge/Goodlette Road Commercial Infill District  Henderson Creek Planned Development/Growth Management Plan Amendment  Mercato Mixed Use Planned Development  Diamond Oaks Village  Imperial Landing MPD  Lely Area Stormwater Improvement Project ROW Analysis  Dean Street MPD  Bonita Exchange MPD  Collier County Public Schools Transportation Ancillary Plant 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 677 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) Richard D. Yovanovich ______________________________ Rich Yovanovich is one of the firm’s shareholders. He moved to Naples in 1990 and was an Assistant County Attorney for Collier County from 1990-1994. As an Assistant County Attorney he focused on land development and construction matters. Since entering private practice in 1994, Mr. Yovanovich has represented property owners through the entitlement process before local and state agencies. His representation includes project ranging from small residential and commercial projects to large developments of regional impact. Professional Activities/Associations The Florida Bar Collier County Bar Association Civic/Charitable Activities/Associations Member, Furman University Trustees Council, 2007 - Chairman, Leadership Collier Foundation Alumni Assoc. Member, Board of Directors, Holocaust Museum 2007 – Member, Leadership Collier, Class of 2000 Member, Board of Directors, CBIA (Director 2004-2008, Vice President 2006-2007) Member, Board of Director, Immokalee Friendship House Member, Board of Director, Avow Hospice 2011- Member, Florida Trend Legal Elite Elder, Vanderbilt Presbyterian Church Bar & Court Admission Florida, 1988 U.S District Court, Middle District of Florida U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit Education University of South Carolina J.D., 1987 J. Ed., 1986 Furman University B.A., cum laude, 1983 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 678 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) Norman Trebilcock, AICP, P.E. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Mr. Trebilcock directs plan production, design development and permitting efforts on public works and private sector projects. Offering 26 years of professional experience, he specializes in transportation engineering, including highway design, signalization, utility relocation, drainage design, street and Site lighting, access management and permitting projects. He prepares and reviews traffic impact statements and related reports. The firm is registered by the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) and South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) as a Small Business Enterprise (SBE), and certified by FDOT in several work groups. Mr. Trebilcock manages team members and various sub-consultants through contract negotiations, preliminary engineering, permitting, final design, and construction administration. He has attended numerous transportation seminars, and has held leadership positions on many transportation-related task forces and in professional societies. Consulting Engineering Services x Coordinated and spearheaded the joint pond agreement successfully executed for the Marbella Lakes project with the FDOT as part of the I-75 6-laning expansion. This agreement helped the FDOT avoid a potentially adverse pond site acquisition, and resulted in a win-win conclusion. x SFWMD surface water management permit assistance on more than 40 residential, commercial, institutional and highway projects totaling over 3,000 acres. Relevant projects include Aster Court Outfall replacement, Bald Eagle Drainage improvements, and Westlake Outfall Pipe improvement replacements. x Provided technical expertise for transportation issues affecting land development projects including Pelican Marsh, Pelican Bay, Lely and Grey Oaks communities. x Designed street lighting system for Woodlands CDD, Airport-Pulling Road, Golden Gate Parkway, Vanderbilt Beach Road, and Airport-Pulling Road/Davis Blvd. intersection. x Designed arterial roadway signalization systems for 20 locations in Southwest Florida, including mast-arm and concrete strain pole installations. x FDOT Conceptual Access permits for the northeast commercial area at Pelican Bay, Naples International Park, and Pelican Marsh PUD. Representative Projects City of Bonita Springs Old 41 Downtown Improvements Design-Build; Bonita Springs, FL As part of a Design-Build team headed by Wright Construction Group (WCG), Trebilcock Consulting Solutions provided traffic design for the roadway improvements. The main feature of the improvements was to reconstruct Old 41 as a complete street with sidewalks, bike lanes, possible narrow median and two travel lanes. Traffic calming features were proposed, as were roundabouts at Terry St and Pennsylvania Ave. Mini roundabouts were anticipated on Old 41. Project length is 4,414 lf (0.84 miles). Parking improvements were proposed along Felts and the cross streets (Wilson, Childers, Ragsdale, Abernathy, Hampton, Crockett, and Dean) within the project limits. City of Naples Design-Build Decorative Mast-arm at 5th Ave and 3rd St; OnPower The project provided design and construction services to replace the existing traffic signal span wire system at the intersection of 5th Ave and 3 rd St with a decorative mast-arm assembly with pedestrian crossing signals. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions provided plan production and design development for the project. Responsibilities included signalization, signing and marking plans, maintenance of traffic plans, and coordination with the project team and City staff. Mercato – Strada Place and Vanderbilt Beach Road Signalization; Collier County, FL Trebilcock Consulting Solutions prepared a traffic study and provided design for a new traffic signal at the intersection of Strada Place and Vanderbilt Beach Road, roadway realignment, signing and marking modifications, traffic control plans, and resurfacing for nearly 0.5 miles of roadway. Multi-modal improvements included bike lanes, sidewalks, and vehicle accommodation. Total Years of Experience 26 Education x University of Florida M.E. in Public Works, 1989 x University of Miami B.S. in Civil Engineering, 1988 x US Army Engineering School Engineer Officer Basic Course, 1988 Licenses / Certifications x Professional Engineer, Florida #47116 x Certified Planner, American x Institute of Certified Planners x Certification, FDOT Advanced Work Zone Traffic Control Affiliations x American Planning Association x American Institute of Certified Planners x American Society of Civil Engineers x Florida Engineering Society, Calusa Chapter (Past President) x Institute of Transportation Engineers x Illuminating Engineering Society x Society of American Military Engineers FDOT Pre-qualifications Group 3 Highway Design - Roadway 3.1 Minor Highway Design Group 6 Traffic Engineering & Operations Studies 6.1 Traffic Engineering Studies 6.2 Traffic Signal Timing Group 7 Traffic Operations Design 7.1 Signing, Pavement Marking & Channelization 7.2 Lighting 7.3 Signalization Group 13 Planning 13.4 Systems Planning 13.5 Subarea/Corridor Planning 13.6 Land Planning/Engineering 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 679 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) Curriculum Vitae George Russell Weyer President Real Estate Econometrics, Inc. 707 Orchid Drive Naples, FL 34102 (239) 269-1341 rweyer@ree-i.com Overview  Over 20 years of real estate development experience in Florida, Ohio and Nevada with large corporations and family-owned companies that focused on commercial office, retail, industrial, hospitality, amenity and large scale community and residential development.  Senior management experience with the entire development process from acquisition identification, due diligence, purchase negotiations, financing, planning and securing entitlements, horizontal and vertical construction, sales/leasing and marketing, to property management and condominium turnover and disposition. Skills also include land acquisition, land planning, entitlement process, financing proforma development, market analysis, land development, CDD management, financing and assessment determination, home and commercial construction, sales and Marketing management, builder selection and management, amenity design and management, residential and commercial property owners association management and design review committee management .  Experience with governmental entities on budgeting, financing and identifying and implementing economic development programs.  Full member of the Urban land Institute and the past chairman of ULI’s Southwest Florida District Council. Expert Testimony  Mr. Weyer has testified as an expert in front of the following courts of law: o In the Circuit Court of the Fifth Judicial Circuit in and for Sumpter County, FL o Florida Department of Administrative Hearings o In the Circuit Court of the Twentieth Judicial Circuit Court in and for Collier County, FL o in the Circuit Court of the Twentieth Judicial Circuit Court in and for Lee County, FL o United States Bankruptcy Court, Middle District of Florida, Fort Myers Division o United States District Court, Middle District of Florida, Fort Myers Division 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 680 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict)  Mr. Weyer has testified as an expert in front of the following governmental jurisdictions: o City of Naples, Florida o Collier County, Florida o City of Bonita Springs, Florida o Hillsborough County, Florida o Lee County, Florida o City of Fort Myers, Florida o City of Cape Coral, Florida o City of North Port, Florida o City of Tamarac, Florida o Miami-Dade County, Florida o Community Redevelopment Agency, Fort Myers, Florida o Community Redevelopment Advisory Board, Naples, Florida  Mr. Weyer has testified as an expert for following bond validation hearings: o Ave Maria Stewardship Community District o Fronterra Community Development District o Hacienda Lakes Community Development District o Cypress Shadows Community Development District Professional Experience  President, Real Estate Econometrics, Inc., Naples, FL 2014-Present Real Estate Econometrics, Inc., a full-service consulting firm specializing in financial, economic and fiscal analysis and implementation for real estate projects, is well-versed in all aspects of the real estate/land development process from determining the market and land acquisition through planning and development and finally marketing and land disposition. Performing real estate valuation analysis, entitlement analysis (commercial need, affordable housing, fiscal impact), CDD formation and management, CDD methodology consultant, commercial POA management, fiscal impact analysis of real estate projects, large scale development market analysis, economic impact analysis, government assessment methodology development, litigation support analysis, public/private partnership coordination, tax increment financing.  Senior Associate, Fishkind & Associates, Inc., Naples, FL 2004-2014 Real estate valuation analysis, entitlement analysis (commercial need, affordable housing, fiscal impact), CDD formation and management, CDD methodology consultant, commercial POA management, fiscal impact analysis of real estate projects, large scale development market analysis, economic impact analysis, government assessment methodology development, litigation support analysis, Cape Canaveral economic and fiscal impact, annexation analysis, impact fee analysis, public/private partnership coordination, tax increment financing. 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 681 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict)  V.P. Development, JED of Southwest Florida, Inc. Naples, FL 2003-2004 Office complex design, construction and management, neighborhood retail complex design, construction and management, entitlement process management.  President, GRW Management, Inc., Naples, FL 2001-2003 Market and entitlement analysis  President, London Bay Homes, Inc. subsidiary, Romanza, Inc. Naples, FL 2000-2001 Managed two offices of an interior design company. Turn around into profitable entity.  V.P. Resort Operations, Lake Las Vegas Joint Venture, Las Vegas NV 1999-2000 Managed all commercial operations on site – 2 hotels, small retail center, two casinos, private community club, lake/marina operations, managed public and private golf course operations, designed and constructed third public golf course and clubhouse, community liaison for development company, design review committee chair, property owners association chair.  President & CEO, Cavalear Corporation, Toledo, OH 1997-1999 Management of 3 master planned communities – one with lake and two with golf courses, development and construction management of 2 residential villa neighborhoods, unit construction for two villa developments, single family unit construction  Director of Commercial Sales, Amenity Management & Marketing, Westinghouse Communities, Inc. Naples/Fort Myers, FL 1983-1997 Amenity manager, managed public and private golf courses, builder program manager, builder sales manager, model row development, marketing manager for two large scale master planned communities – Pelican Bay and Gateway, started and managed Pelican Landing and Pelican Marsh marketing departments. Education University of Miami, Miami, FL MBA 1993 Michigan State University, Bachelor of Arts, Communications, 1977 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 682 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) May 27, 2020 Exhibit Cover Pages.docx Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, FL 34134  239-947-1144  engineering@gradyminor.com  www.gradyminor.com Creekside Commerce Park East Mixed Use Subdistrict (PL20190002849) Exhibit III.B Sketch and Legal 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 683 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 684 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) 5801 Pelican Bay Boulevard, Suite 300, Naples, FL 34108 Legal Description Part of Tracts “2”, “P-1”, “4”, & “5”, All of Creekside Commerce Park East, Plat Book 54, Pages 84-86, Collier County, Florida BEGINNING at the Southeast corner of Tract “2” of Creekside Commerce Park East, a subdivision according to the Plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 54, Pages 84 through 86, Public Records of Collier County, Florida; Thence along the boundary of said Creekside Commerce Park East, in the following seven (7) described courses: 1. Thence South 89°50'21" West 577.07 feet; 2. Thence North 05°34'08" West 72.46 feet; 3. Thence North 66°44'29" East 17.23 feet; 4. Thence North 00°53'43" West 69.01 feet; 5. Thence North 38°43'12" East 58.71 feet; 6. Thence North 50°41'54" East 19.94 feet; 7. Thence North 44°02'42" East 26.03 feet; Thence leaving said boundary, North 22°50'18" West 30.00 feet; Thence 140.61 feet along the arc of a non-tangential circular curve concave Northwest having a radius of 120.00 feet through a central angle of 67°08'12" and being subtended by a chord which bears North 33°35'37" East 132.70 feet; Thence North 00°01'31" East 245.17 feet; Thence North 89°58'29" West 543.61 feet; Thence North 104.59 feet; Thence 14.65 feet along the arc of a circular curve concave West having a radius of 512.67 feet through a central angle of 01°38'15" and being subtended by a chord which bears North 00°49'08" West 14.65 feet; Thence continue 69.45 feet along the arc of a circular curve concave West having a radius of 512.67 feet through a central angle of 07°45'41" and being subtended by a chord which bears North 05°31'06" West 69.39 feet; to a point of reverse curvature; Thence 48.88 feet along the arc of a circular curve concave East having a radius of 987.33 feet through a central angle of 02°50'12" and being subtended by a chord which bears North 07°58'50" West 48.88 feet to a point of compound curve; Thence 36.53 feet along the arc of a circular curve concave Southeast having a radius of 23.00 feet through a central angle of 90°59'35" and being subtended by a chord which bears North 38°56'04" East 32.81 feet; Thence North 84°25'51" East 62.31 feet; Thence 50.12 feet along the arc of a circular curve concave South having a radius of 498.00 feet through a central angle of 05°45'59" and being subtended by a chord which bears North 87°18'51" East 50.10 feet; Thence South 89°48'09" East 263.66 feet; Thence 44.80 feet along the arc of a circular curve concave North having a radius of 326.00 feet through a central angle of 07°52'23" and being subtended by a chord which bears North 86°15'39" East 44.76 feet; Thence North 82°19'28" East 30.07 feet; 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 685 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) 2 Thence 40.95 feet along the arc of a circular curve concave South having a radius of 298.00 feet through a central angle of 07°52'23" and being subtended by a chord which bears North 86°15'39" East 40.92 feet; Thence South 89°20'08" East 8.64 feet; Thence South 64°23'22" East 3.47 feet to a point on the Westerly right-of-way line of Creekside Boulevard East (Tract “C”) of said Creekside Commerce Park East; Thence along said right-of-way, South 00°01'30" West 272.95 feet; Thence leaving said right-of-way, South 89°58'29" East 459.66 feet to a point on the East boundary line of said Creekside Commerce Park East; Thence along said East boundary line, South 01°04'53" East 611.74 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing 9.996 acres more or less. Subject to easements and restrictions of record. Bearings are based on the South line of Creekside Commerce Park East Being South 89º50’21” West. Certificate of authorization #LB-7866 Stantec Consulting Services, Inc. Registered Engineers and Land Surveyors By: May 5, 2020 Lance T Miller, Professional Surveyor and Mapper #LS5627 Not valid unless embossed with the Professional’s seal. Ref. 215615702-SK01 Sheet 1 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 686 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) Creekside Commerce Park East Mixed Use Subdistrict (PL20190002849) Exhibit IV.B Amendment Language December 22, 2020 Page 1 of 4 BCCPUD-19 Exhibit IVB Proposed Language-r2.docx Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, FL 34134  239-947-1144  engineering@gradyminor.com  www.gradyminor.com Revise the FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT *** *** *** *** *** Text break *** *** *** *** *** TABLE OF CONTENTS *** *** *** *** *** Text break *** *** *** *** *** * FUTURE LAND USE MAP SERIES 140 * Future Land Use Map * Mixed Use & Interchange Activity Centers Maps * Properties Consistent by Policy (5.11, 5.12, 5.13, 5.14) Maps * Collier County Wetlands Map * Collier County Wellhead Protection Areas and Proposed Wellfields and ASRs Map * Future Land Use Map Rivers and Floodplains Map * Estuarine Bays Map * Future Land Use Map Soils * Future Land Use Map Existing Commercial Mineral Extraction Sites * Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Overlay Map * Stewardship Overlay Map * Rural Lands Study Area Natural Resource Index Maps * North Belle Meade Overlay Map * North Belle Meade Overlay Map Section 24 * Future Schools and Ancillary Facilities Map * Existing Schools and Ancillary Facilities Map * Plantation Island Urban Area Map * Copeland Urban Area Map * Railhead Scrub Preserve – Conservation Designation Map * Lely Mitigation Park – Conservation Designation Map * Margood Park – Conservation Designation Map * Urban – Rural Fringe Transition Zone Overlay Map * Orange Blossom Mixed Use Subdistrict Map * Vanderbilt Beach/Collier Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict Map * Goodlette/Pine Ridge Mixed Use Subdistrict Map * Henderson Creek Mixed Use Subdistrict Map * Buckley Mixed Use Subdistrict Map * Livingston/Pine Ridge Commercial Infill Subdistrict Map * Vanderbilt Beach Road Neighborhood Commercial Subdistrict Map * Livingston Road/Eatonwood Lane Commercial Infill Subdistrict Map * Livingston Road Commercial Infill Subdistrict Map * Livingston Road/Veteran’s Memorial Boulevard Commercial Infill Subdistrict Map * Corkscrew Island Neighborhood Commercial Subdistrict Map 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 687 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) Page 2 of 4 * Collier Boulevard Community Facility Subdistrict Map * Orange Blossom/Airport Crossroads Commercial Subdistrict Map * Coastal High Hazard Area Map * Coastal High Hazard Area Comparison Map * Gordon River Greenway Conservation Area Designation Map * Hibiscus Residential Infill Subdistrict Map * Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict Map * Davis ‒ Radio Commercial Subdistrict Map * Logan Boulevard/Immokalee Road Commercial Infill Subdistrict Map * Mini Triangle Mixed Use Subdistrict Map * East Tamiami Trail Commercial Infill Subdistrict Map * Creekside Commerce Park East Mixed Use Subdistrict Map *** *** *** *** *** Text break *** *** *** *** *** II. IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY [beginning page 9] GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES *** *** *** *** *** Text break *** *** *** *** *** Policy 1.5: [beginning page 9] The URBAN Future Land Use Designation shall include Future Land Use Districts and Subdistricts for: A. URBAN – MIXED USE DISTRICT 1. Urban Residential Subdistrict 2. Urban Residential Fringe Subdistrict 3. Urban Coastal Fringe Subdistrict 4. Business Park Subdistrict 5. Office and Infill Commercial Subdistrict 6. PUD Neighborhood Village Center Subdistrict 7. Residential Mixed Use Neighborhood Subdistrict 8. Orange Blossom Mixed-Use Subdistrict 9. Vanderbilt Beach/Collier Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict 10. Henderson Creek Mixed-Use Subdistrict 11. Research and Technology Park Subdistrict 12. Buckley Mixed-Use Subdistrict 13. Commercial Mixed Use Subdistrict 14. Livingston/Radio Road Commercial Infill Subdistrict 15. Vanderbilt Beach Road Neighborhood Commercial Subdistrict 16. Collier Boulevard Community Facility Subdistrict 17. Hibiscus Residential Infill Subdistrict 18. Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict 19. [RESERVED] 20. Goodlette/Pine Ridge Mixed Use Subdistrict 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 688 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) Page 3 of 4 21. Livingston Road/Veterans Memorial Boulevard East Residential Subdistrict 22. Creekside Commerce Park East Mixed Use Subdistrict *** *** *** *** *** Text break *** *** *** *** *** A. Urban Mixed Use District [beginning page 27] *** *** *** *** *** Text break *** *** *** *** *** 22. Creekside Commerce Park East Mixed Use Subdistrict [page 50] This Subdistrict consists of 9.9+/- acres and is located on the east side of Goodlette-Frank Road within the Creekside Commerce Park CPUD. The purpose of the subdistrict is to permit development of up to 300 multi-family rental apartments within a portion of the Creekside Commerce Park PUD, in addition to other non-residential uses permitted within the PUD. The Creekside Commerce Park CPUD shall include specific development standards for the proposed multi-family rental units. Development within the Subdistrict shall be subject to the following: a. The maximum multi-family rental apartments permitted within the Subdistrict is 300 dwelling units. *** *** *** *** *** Text break *** *** *** *** *** FUTURE LAND USE MAP SERIES [beginning page 148] Future Land Use Map Activity Center Index Map Mixed Use & Interchange Activity Center Maps Properties Consistent by Policy (5.11, 5.12, 5.13, 5.14) Maps Collier County Wetlands Map Collier County Wellhead Protection Areas and Proposed Wellfields and ASRs Map Future Land Use Map Rivers and Floodplains Future Land Use Map Estuarine Bays Future Land Use Map Soils Existing Commercial Mineral Extraction Sites Map Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Overlay Map Stewardship Overlay Map Rural Lands Study Area Natural Resource Index Maps 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 689 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) Page 4 of 4 North Belle Meade Overlay Map North Belle Meade Overlay Map Section 24 Existing Schools and Ancillary Facilities Map Future Schools and Ancillary Facilities Map Plantation Island Urban Area Map Copeland Urban Area Map Railhead Scrub Preserve – Conservation Designation Map Lely Mitigation Park – Conservation Designation Map Margood Park Conservation Designation Map Urban Rural Fringe Transition Zone Overlay Map Orange Blossom Mixed Use Subdistrict Map Vanderbilt Beach/Collier Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict Map Goodlette/Pine Ridge Mixed Use Subdistrict Map Henderson Creek Mixed-Use Subdistrict Map Buckley Mixed-Use Subdistrict Map Livingston/Pine Ridge Commercial Infill Subdistrict Map Vanderbilt Beach Road Neighborhood Commercial Subdistrict Map Livingston Road/Eatonwood Lane Commercial Infill Subdistrict Map Livingston Road Commercial Infill Subdistrict Map Orange Blossom/Airport Crossroads Commercial Subdistrict Livingston Road/Veteran’s Memorial Boulevard Commercial Infill Subdistrict Map Corkscrew Island Neighborhood Commercial Subdistrict Map Collier Boulevard Community Facility Subdistrict Map Coastal High Hazard Area Map Coastal High Hazard Area Comparison Map Gordon River Greenway Conservation Area Designation Map Hibiscus Residential Infill Subdistrict Map Vincentian Mixed Use Subdistrict Map Davis ‒ Radio Commercial Subdistrict Map Logan Boulevard/Immokalee Road Commercial Infill Subdistrict Map Mini Triangle Mixed Use Subdistrict Map East Tamiami Trail Commercial Infill Subdistrict Map Seed to Table Commercial Subdistrict Map Livingston Road/Veterans Memorial Boulevard East Residential Subdistrict Map Creekside Commerce Park East Mixed Use Subdistrict 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 690 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) 0 6000'3000' SCALE: 1" = 6000' GradyMinor Civil Engineers ●Land Surveyors ●Planners ●Landscape Architects Cert. of Auth. EB 0005151 Cert. of Auth. LB 0005151 Business LC 26000266 Q. Grady Minor and Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey Bonita Springs, Florida 34134 Bonita Springs: 239.947.1144 ZZZ.GradyMinor.coP Fort Myers: 239.690.4380 WHEN PLOTTED @ 8.5" X 11" SUBJECT PROPERTY: URBAN DESIGNATION, MIXED USE DISTRICT, CREEKSIDE COMMERCE PARK MIXED USE SUBDISTRICT = 9.9± ACRES 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 691 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) IMMOKALEE ROAD GOODLETTE-FRANK ROADCOLLI E R S R E S E R V E D R. CREEKSIDE PKWY HEALTH PARK BLVDGradyMinor Civil Engineers ●Land Surveyors ●Planners ●Landscape Architects Cert. of Auth. EB 0005151 Cert. of Auth. LB 0005151 Business LC 26000266 Q. Grady Minor and Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey Bonita Springs, Florida 34134 Bonita Springs: 239.947.1144 ZZZ.GradyMinor.coP Fort Myers: 239.690.4380 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 692 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) 0 300'150' SCALE: 1" = 300' GradyMinor Civil Engineers ●Land Surveyors ●Planners ●Landscape Architects Cert. of Auth. EB 0005151 Cert. of Auth. LB 0005151 Business LC 26000266 Q. Grady Minor and Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey Bonita Springs, Florida 34134 Bonita Springs: 239.947.1144 ZZZ.GradyMinor.coP Fort Myers: 239.690.4380 WHEN PLOTTED @ 8.5" X 11" SUBJECT PROPERTY - 9.9± ACRES EXISTING FLUE:URBAN DESIGNATION, MIXED USE DISTRICT, RESIDENTIAL SUBDISTRICT EXISTING ZONING:CREEKSIDE COMMERCE PARK CPUD ADJACENT PROPERTY ZONING LAND USE NORTH CPUD COMMERCIAL, RETAIL, ALF EAST CPUD, PUD UNDEVELOPED, MEDICAL OFFICES SOUTH CPUD, I SELF STORAGE, WATER TREATMENT FACILITY WEST CPUD OFFICES, SELF STORAGE, MEDICAL FACILITY SUBJECT PROPERTY 9.9+/- ACRES 300 FOOT RADIUS ZONED: CREEKSIDE COMMERCE PARK CPUD USE: COMMERCIAL/RETAIL AND ALF ZONED: CREEKSIDE COMMERCE PARK CPUD AND I (INDUSTRIAL) USE: SELF STORAGE AND WATER TREATMENT FACILITY ZONED: CREEKSIDE COMMERCE PARK CPUD USE: UNDEVELOPED ZONED: SW PROFESSIONAL HEALTH PARK CPUDUSE: MEDICAL OFFICESUBJECT PROPERTY 9.9+/- ACRES ZONED: CREEKSIDE COMMERCE PARK CPUD USE: OFFICES AND HOSPITAL 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 693 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) 0 6000'3000' SCALE: 1" = 6000' GradyMinor Civil Engineers ●Land Surveyors ●Planners ●Landscape Architects Cert. of Auth. EB 0005151 Cert. of Auth. LB 0005151 Business LC 26000266 Q. Grady Minor and Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey Bonita Springs, Florida 34134 Bonita Springs: 239.947.1144 ZZZ.GradyMinor.coP Fort Myers: 239.690.4380 WHEN PLOTTED @ 8.5" X 11" SUBJECT PROPERTY: URBAN DESIGNATION, MIXED USE DISTRICT, URBAN RESIDENTIAL SUBDISTRICT = 9.9± ACRES 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 694 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) May 27, 2020 Exhibit Cover Pages.docx Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, FL 34134  239-947-1144  engineering@gradyminor.com  www.gradyminor.com Creekside Commerce Park East Mixed Use Subdistrict (PL20190002849) Exhibit V.C Environmental Data 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 695 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) Environmental Supplement For Collier County Zoning Application CREEKSIDE MAY 2020 Prepared by: TURRELL, HALL & ASSOCIATES, INC 3584 EXCHANGE AVENUE NAPLES, FL 34104 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 696 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) Creekside Environmental Supplement May 15, 2020 Page 1 of 16 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Creekside project site is located in north eastern Collier County, in the south east corner of the intersection of Goodlette-Frank Road and Immokalee Road (CR 846), approximately ¾ of a mile east of US 41. The project boundary is located within Section 27, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. The project is bordered on the south by the North Collier Reclamation Facility and Pelican Marsh PUD, on the west by the Naples Daily News facility, on the north by Immokalee Road and the North Collier Health Park, and the east by additional medical services facilities. Access to the project is via Goodlette-Frank Road along the western boundary of the property. A general location map is provided in the included exhibits. The proposed project is part of an existing commercial development that is bisected by Goodlette- Frank Road. The project has been developed predominantly on the west side of Goodlette-Frank Road with the majority of this side developed or cleared for future development. Businesses currently present on the site west of Goodlette-Frank Road (Creekside Commerce Park West Units One and Two) include: A gas station/convenience store, a bank, a U.S. Post Office, Arthrex Corporation, Creekside Medical Center, as well as a few other businesses. The vacant properties west of Goodlette-Frank Road have been cleared for future construction and three of the parcels have been constructed with medical and assisted living facilities. Also present are existing preserves, a drainage canal, and assorted stormwater management features. The southeast portion of the project site is an existing self-storage facility. The current PUD site is approximately 106 acres. It was 108 acres originally but was reduced in the past when approximately 2 acres was taken out of this CPUD and placed into the adjacent CPUD to the west. The majority of the site has been developed according to prior development approvals. The minimum native habitat requirements would have been based on the native habitats present at the time of the original development approvals. Historical aerials were examined in order to determine the native habitat components that were present prior to the development. The majority of the eastern portion of the site was composed of agricultural fields and the old Regency Packing house. (See enclosed native vegetation map). The western portion of the site was forested and composed of predominately native habitats. Based on a review of 1995 aerials of the site it was estimated that there were 40.93 acres of native habitats present prior to the original PUD approval. The Collier County Land Development Code requires preservation of at least 15% of this which would equate to 6.14 acres. However, a February 2008 Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) produced by Johnson Engineering stated that a minimum preserve requirement of 7.00 acres had been outlined in the prior CPUD approvals. County Staff have stated in prior reviews that 7.00 acres will remain the minimum preserve requirement. The current proposal will impact approximately 1.87 acres of the existing 7.00 acres of platted preserves to allow for the expansion of one of the commercial parcels and reconfiguration of the stormwater management system. Should the project modification be approved, the remaining preserve area within the PUD boundary will be 5.13 acres. The applicant is proposing to provide a minimum of 1.87 acres of required preserve through an off-site source. This environmental summary is for the property on the east side of Goodlette-Frank Road. This parcel is approximately 28.9 acres in size and currently has three facilities already constructed. 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 697 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) Creekside Environmental Supplement May 15, 2020 Page 2 of 16 The amendment is being proposes to alter the site plan to allow for the expansion of the buildable area associated with this project. Requirements for stormwater management, parking, emergency access and traffic flow result in one of the remaining buildable areas being too small to accommodate potential businesses that may want to settle here. The information contained in this report is focused primarily on the modification to the native habitat and development areas proposed on the east side of Goodlette-Frank Road. This document provides information concerning the proposed project site as it relates to natural resources and environmental issues. It is submitted to Collier County in support of a zoning request made by the applicant. 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 698 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) Creekside Environmental Supplement May 15, 2020 Page 3 of 16 2. EXISTING CONDITIONS (Pre-Development) 2.1 VEGETATION ASSOCIATIONS The existing habitat types (based on FLUCFCS codes) are shown in Table 1 below and Exhibit 2 (FLUCFCS Map). Of the total 28.92 acres contained within the Creekside East property boundary, 81% classify as uplands (23.42 ac.) and 8% classify as wetlands (2.30 ac.). The majority of the property is relatively free of noxious exotic vegetation though a few species are present including melaleuca, Brazilian pepper and earleaf acacia. Table 1- FLUCFCS Codes & Acreages Wetland Habitat FLUCCS Code Acreage Mixed Wetland Forest 630 2.30 Other Surface Waters FLUCCS Code Acreage Drainage Canal 510 0.49 Stormwater Pond 534 3.06 Upland Habitat FLUCCS Code Acreage Commercial Services under Construction 140 6.57 Medical and Healthcare 174 7.19 Open Land 190 2.30 Urban Land in Transition 193 1.78 Pine Flatwood 411 1.59 Pine – Mesic Oak 414 1.06 Disturbed Land 743 0.17 Road and Highway 814 2.41 28.92 A list of plant species observed within each native habitat type is found below. Table 2- Typical Plant species by Habitat 411 – Pine Flatwoods, 1.59 acres 5% of site Melaleuca Melaleuca quinquenervia C, M Rare Slash Pine Pinus elliottii C, M Dominant Cabbage Palm Sabal palmetto C, M Occasional 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 699 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) Creekside Environmental Supplement May 15, 2020 Page 4 of 16 Earleaf Acacia Acacia auriculiformis C, M Occasional Brazilian Pepper Schinus terebinthifolia C, M & G Rare Saw Palmetto Serenoa repens M & G Rare Myrsine Myrsine guianensis M & G Common Wax Myrtle Myrica cerifera M & G Occasional Java Plum Syzgium cumini M Rare Greenbriar Smilax spp. V Occasional Grapevine Vitis rotundifolia V Occasional Poison Ivy Toxicodendron radicans V Common 414 – Pine – Mesic Oak, 1.06 acres 4% of site Slash Pine Pinus elliottii C, M Common Laurel Oak Quercus laurifolia C, M Common Cabbage Palm Sabal palmetto C, M Occasional Earleaf Acacia Acacia auriculiformis C, M Occasional Brazilian Pepper Schinus terebinthifolia C, M & G Rare Myrsine Myrsine guianensis M & G Common Wax Myrtle Myrica cerifera M & G Occasional Greenbriar Smilax spp. V Occasional Grapevine Vitis rotundifolia V Occasional Poison Ivy Toxicodendron radicans V Common 630 – Mixed Wetland Forest, 2.30 acres 8 % of site Cypress Taxodium distichum C & M Occasional Slash Pine Pinus elliottii C Common Carolina Willow Salix caroliniana M Occasional Cabbage Palm Sabal palmetto C, M & G Common Wax Myrtle Myrica cerifera M & G Occasional Pond Apple Annona glabra M Rare St. John’s Wort Hypericum fasciculatum G Occasional Virginia Chain Fern Woodwardia virginica G Occasional Swamp Fern Blechnum serrulatum G Dominant Sawgrass Cladium jamaicense G Occasional Blue Maidencane Amphicarpum muhlenbergianum G Occasional Beakrush Rhynchospora filifolia G Occasional Camphorweed Pluchea baccharis G Occasional Thoroughwort Eupatorium mikanioides G Occasional Saltbush Baccharis halimifolia G Occasional C = Canopy M = Midstory G = Groundcover V = Vine E = Epiphyte * - Protected species 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 700 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) Creekside Environmental Supplement May 15, 2020 Page 5 of 16 2.2 WETLANDS & OTHER SURFACE WATERS Qualified Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc. environmental staff inspected the project lands for the purpose of delineating wetlands and other surface waters. The wetland delineation methodologies and criteria set forth by the state (in Chapter 62-340, FAC, Delineation of the Landward Extent of Wetlands and Surface Waters) and the US Army Corps of Engineers (in the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual) were followed in determining whether an area classified as a wetland or other surface water and in delineating the limits (boundaries) of potential jurisdictional wetlands and other surface waters. 2.2.1 Wetland Seasonal High Water Table & Hydroperiod The hydrologic regime on these properties is extremely altered from historical levels and patterns by surrounding urban uses. Water from adjacent properties (storage facility and waste water treatment plant) runs onto the eastern site and flows through the wetland into the drainage canal along the eastern boundary. From there it flows north under Immokalee Road and into the Cocohatchee River. The isolated wetland area is in relatively good shape with respect to exotic vegetation but is isolated by commercial development to the point where minimal wildlife utilization occurs. With the site lying between development and major roadways, this wetland habitat does not maintain the normal hydrology that was historically present due to manipulation of surficial flows from the surrounding developments. 2.2.2 Jurisdictional Status of Wetlands & Other Surface Waters The Creekside wetland lines were established during the original permitting of the property and are assumed to be jurisdictional with the Federal permitting agencies per their delineation guidelines. The South Florida Water Management District identified the eastern wetland area as impacted during the previous permitting efforts and did not require any conservation easement to be placed on it. They treated the area as a part of the surface water management system for the property. The other surface waters on the site include the ponds and the ditch and swale system that currently transport water through the center of the western property and along the eastern boundary of the east property north under Immokalee Road. This system will be modified under the current proposal with a portion of the ponds being filled in and new areas constructed or expanded within the project boundaries. Likewise, the ditch and swale system on the eastern side will be modified to accommodate the revised parcel boundary. 2.3 LISTED PLANT & ANIMAL SPECIES A survey for listed animal and plant species has been conducted on the project lands by Turrell, Hall & Associates biologists. This threatened and endangered species survey and its results are discussed in the attached Listed Species Summary Report. The Listed Species summary describes 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 701 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) Creekside Environmental Supplement May 15, 2020 Page 6 of 16 the approximate locations where listed animal species were observed on and near the project lands during the course of the referenced survey. The majority of listed animal species observed were either flying over the project lands or observed on adjacent lands. During the survey events white ibis (Eudocimus albus) and several hawks flew over the site, while snowy egret (Egretta thula) and white ibis were seen adjacent to this property. A tri-colored heron (Egretta tricolor) was observed foraging along the lake bank. None of the listed species observed, reside on or nest on the project lands. Due to isolation and degradation of foraging habitat, it is apparent that this site offers only minimal value to local wildlife. The two major roadways on the north and west boundaries of the site as well as the development in all directions have isolated this property and made travel to it by terrestrial wildlife both difficult and dangerous. 2.4 HISTORICAL/ ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES The Florida Master Site File (MSF) is a database of the known historic and archaeological sites in the state of Florida. The MSF office was contacted during the initial permitting of the site and indicated that no recorded archaeological sites exist on the subject property or in close proximity. If a suspected archaeological or historical artifact is discovered during the course of site development activities (construction, clearing, etc.), the development activities at the specific site will be immediately halted and the appropriate agency notified. Development will be suspended for a sufficient length of time to enable the County or a designated consultant to assess the find and determine the proper course of action. 2.5 SOILS Based on the National Resource Conservation Service (NRCS) "Soil Survey of Collier County Area, Florida" (NRCS, 1998) there are five (5) different soil types (soil map units) present on the project lands. The attached exhibit provides a soils map for the project area as derived from the NRCS mapping. The following sub-sections provide a brief description of each soil map unit identified on the project lands. Information is provided about the soil's landscape position (i.e. it’s typical location in the landscape on a county-wide basis), the soil's profile (i.e. textural composition and thickness or depth range of the layers or horizons commonly present in the soil), and the soil's drainage and hydrologic characteristics. The soils occurring on project lands are as follows: (7) Immokalee Fine Sand (non-hydric) Landscape position – Flatwoods. Soil profile – Surface layer to a depth of about 6 inches consists of black fine sand. Subsurface layer to depth of about 35 inches consist of light gray fine sand. Subsoil layers below this to a depth of 58 inches consist of fine sand. Below these layers the subsoil is pale brown fine sand to a depth of about 80 inches. Drainage/Hydrologic characteristics – Poorly drained. Permeability is moderate. The seasonal high water table (apparent) is within a depth of 6 to 18 inches for 1 to 6 months and can recede to a 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 702 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) Creekside Environmental Supplement May 15, 2020 Page 7 of 16 depth of more than 40 inches during extended dry periods. Hydrologic group is B/D. (8) Myakka Fine Sand (non-hydric) Landscape position – Flatwoods. Soil profile – Surface layer to a depth of about 7 inches consists of dark grey fine sand. Subsurface layer to depth of about 27 inches consist of light gray to light brown fine sand. Subsoil layers below this to a depth of 48 inches consist of black fine sand. Below these layers the subsoil is yellowish brown fine sand to a depth of about 80 inches. Drainage/Hydrologic characteristics – Poorly drained. Permeability is moderate. The seasonal high water table (apparent) is within a depth of 6 to 18 inches for 1 to 6 months and can recede to a depth of more than 40 inches during extended dry periods. Hydrologic group is B/D. (17) Basinger Fine Sand (hydric) Landscape position – Sloughs and poorly defined drainageways. Soil profile – Surface layer to a depth of about 3 inches consists of dark grayish brown fine sand. Subsurface layer to depth of about 25 inches consist of light gray fine sand. Subsurface layers below this to a depth of 44 inches consist of brown fine sand. Limestone bedrock begins at a depth of about 80 inches. Drainage/Hydrologic characteristics – Poorly drained. Permeability is rapid. The seasonal high water table (apparent) is within a depth of 12 inches for 3 to 6 months and can recede to a depth of more than 40 inches during extended dry periods. Hydrologic group is B/D. (20) Ft. Drum and Malabar High Fine Sands (non-hydric) Landscape position – Ridges along sloughs. Soil profile – The surface layer is typically a very dark grayish brown fine sand about 5 inches thick. The subsurface is fine sand to a depth of about 20 inches. The subsoil is light brownish gray fine sand to a depth of about 80 inches. Limestone bedrock is at a depth of around 30 inches. Drainage/Hydrologic characteristics – Poorly drained. Permeability is rapid for Ft. Drum to slow for Malabar . Under natural conditions, the seasonal high water table (apparent) is set at a depth of 6 to 18 inches for 1 to 6 months during most years. During the other months, the water table is below a depth of 18 inches, and it recedes to a depth of more than 40 inches during extended dry periods. Hydrologic group is C. (39) Satellite Fine Sand (non-hydric) Landscape position – Low coastal ridges. Soil profile – Surface layer to a depth of about 3 inches consists of gray fine sand. Subsurface layers below this to a depth of 80 inches consist of light gray to white fine sand. Limestone bedrock begins at a depth of about 55 inches. Drainage/Hydrologic characteristics – Well drained. Permeability is very rapid. The seasonal high 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 703 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) Creekside Environmental Supplement May 15, 2020 Page 8 of 16 water table (apparent) is within a depth of 24 to 42 inches for 1 to 6 months and can recede to a depth of more than 42 inches during the rest of the year. Hydrologic group is C. 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 704 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) Creekside Environmental Supplement May 15, 2020 Page 9 of 16 3. PROPOSED CONDITIONS (Post-Development) 3.1 PROPOSED PROJECT The proposed project is to modify some of the individual parcel boundaries to allow for modified buildings and uses. The proposed modifications will also impact existing native habitat as outlined in this report. The enclosed exhibits illustrate the development and preserve areas that currently exist and that proposed changes that would result following this amendment. A commercial and/or industrial development will be required to preserve 15% of the native vegetation that was present at the time of the original approvals. County staff have indicated that this equates to 7.00 acres based on past CPUD approval. The proposed project will impact approximately 1.87 acres of the existing native habitat preserve on the site. The proposed impacts include about 1.18 acres of wetlands and 0.69 acre of uplands. The preserve area has been degraded by isolation and hydrological impacts. The enclosed exhibits illustrate the areas that will be impacted and created by the proposed development changes. The proposed project modifications will result in the loss of existing on-site native habitat. Should the project modification be approved, the remaining native preserve area within the PUD boundary will be 5.13 acres. The applicant has committed to providing a minimum of 1.87 acres of native preserve through an off-site source. 3.2 PROJECT IMPACTS TO WETLANDS 3.2.1 Direct, Permanent Impacts Changes proposed to the project will result in wetland impacts. However, the wetlands that will be impacted have already been deemed impacted by the SFWMD during the original permitting efforts on the project site. The condition and status of the wetlands as well as their use as a stormwater conveyance from properties to the south, made it difficult to preserve them in a viable condition once the development was permitted so the SFWMD included this area in the original impact calculations. However, because the Corps did not account for these impacts in previous permitting, mitigation for these impacts will be provided under the current USACE permit. The project will result in direct, permanent impacts to a total of 1.18 acres of wetland area. As used herein, the term "direct impacts" refers to actions that will result in the complete elimination of jurisdictional areas (i.e. excavation and fill). The wetland area to be impacted was assessed utilizing the UMAM assessment methodology and has a value of 0.40 functional units per acre. Therefore, the project will require 0.47 wetland credits to compensate for the proposed impacts. 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 705 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) Creekside Environmental Supplement May 15, 2020 Page 10 of 16 3.2.2 Temporary Impacts No temporary impacts are expected with this development. Prior to construction commencement all remaining preserve areas will be enclosed with siltation-prevention devices, which will remain in place until the adjacent construction is completed. 3.2.3 Secondary Impacts to Wetlands & Water Resources The previous permitting of the project's development features already accounted for and mitigated for the direct impact to all on-site wetlands so no secondary impacts will occur. Adjacent properties are already developed so no secondary impacts to off-site wetlands is expected either. Table 3- Preserves, Impacts and Secondary Impacts Wetland Habitat FLUCCS Code Total Acreage Direct Impacts Secondary Impacts Preserve Mixed Wetland Forest 630 2.30 1.18 0.00 1.12 Totals 2.30 1.18 0.00 1.12 Upland Habitat FLUCCS Code Total Acreage Impacts Preserves Oak Pine Community 414 1.06 0.64 0.42 Pine Flatwood 411 1.59 0.06 1.53 Totals 2.65 0.69 1.95 ** Acreages in Table 3 above apply to preserve area on East side of Goodlette road only. Acreage discrepancy of 0.01 acre is a result of rounding error. 3.3 PROJECT IMPACTS TO LISTED SPECIES A survey for listed animal and plant species was conducted on the project lands by Turrell, Hall & Associates biologists. This listed species survey and its results are discussed in the attached Listed Species summary. The listed animals associated with these project lands as observed directly or indirectly by Turrell, Hall & Associates included the white ibis, and snowy egret. Currently the closest documented a ctive eagle’s nest is approximately 2.5 mile northwest of the project lands. A tri-colored heron was observed foraging along the lake banks. White ibis and snowy egrets were also observed perched in trees on the Creekside East property. White ibis and snowy egret were also observed on the open mowed lands to the east of the project site. 3.4 PROJECT IMPACTS TO ARCHAEOLOGICAL/ HISTORICAL RESOURCES As outlined in Section 2.4 of this report, it does not appear that development of the Creekside property will impact any historic properties listed, or eligible for listing, in the National Register of Historic Places or otherwise of historical, architectural, or archaeological value. If a suspected archaeological or historical artifact is discovered during the course of site development activities (construction, clearing, etc.), the development activities at the specific site will be immediately 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 706 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) Creekside Environmental Supplement May 15, 2020 Page 11 of 16 halted and the appropriate agency notified. Development will be suspended for a sufficient length of time to enable the County or a designated consultant to assess the find and determine the proper course of action. 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 707 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) Creekside Environmental Supplement May 15, 2020 Page 12 of 16 4.0 PRESERVE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM The Creekside preserve areas have an existing approved management plan. The proposed preserves will continue to be managed as outlined in the approved plan. Preserve areas will be maintained to suppress infestation by exotic/invasive and nuisance plant species. Maintenance/management actions will be conducted as required to meet the success criteria as outlined in the plan as well as to insure stormwater management capacity as required under the drainage easement. The Preserve Management Plan outlines the maintenance activities proposed within the preserve areas associated with the project. It also outlines any monitoring efforts that may be done to track and document the success of the maintenance efforts. Follow-up exotic and nuisance plant control will include directed herbicide applications and/or physical removal methods throughout all portions of the preserve area. Exotic/nuisance plant control is likely to occur on at least an annual basis. Such maintenance events may be conducted more frequently if field observations indicate the need. At the end of this period, the frequency of activities necessary to adequately control nuisance and exotic plants will be re-assessed and a program developed for future maintenance. At a minimum there will be at least one exotic/nuisance plant control event per year of monitoring. Supplemental plantings will be conducted as necessary when and where survivorship, density, and/or percent cover goals are not achieved. The need for such re-plantings will typically be assessed on an annual basis. Management/maintenance activities may include removal of dead, dying, or diseased plants (both planted and existing plants) as deemed necessary. Any work necessary to accommodate the stormwater drainage aspects of the area will also be undertaken to insure no adverse hydrological impacts occur to upstream properties. A qualified biologist or similar environmental professional will inspect the preserve area at least once a year for the duration of the monitoring program. The necessary maintenance activities will be determined by the biologist during these inspections. The maintenance will be conducted during the course of the year following issuance of the biologist's recommendations. The preserve area will be maintained in perpetuity such that the total vegetative cover accounted for by nuisance plants constitutes no more than 5% of total plant cover. All exotic plants will be removed from the preserves as part of the maintenance events. 4.1 PROTECTION OF PRESERVES VIA CONSERVATION EASEMENTS Since the SFWMD has permitted these areas as impacted, and because of the underlaying drainage aspects associated, they will not accept conservation easements over them. These areas are included in the Collier County native vegetation requirement but because of the drainage component associated with the area, they will likewise not accept a conservation easement over the remaining area due to the possibility that drainage improvements or maintenance may need to occur sometime in the future. 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 708 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) Creekside Environmental Supplement May 15, 2020 Page 13 of 16 4.2 PRESERVE ENHANCEMENT VIA MAINTENANCE & ERADICATION OF EXOTIC & NUISANCE PLANT SPECIES The preserve area will be maintained in perpetuity to ensure that the areas are free from exotic/invasive plant species immediately following maintenance events. Exotic invasive plant species will include Category I and Category II species identified in the current “Invasive Plant List” published by the Florida Exotic Pest Plan Council (FLEPPC) as well as Class I and Class II Prohibited Aquatic Plants listed in Chapter 62C-52.011, Florida Administrative Code. Nuisance plant species will include native plant species deemed detrimental due to their potential adverse competition with desirable native species. Visual inspections for exotic, non-native and nuisance plant invasion will be conducted annually, at a minimum, and all exotic, non-native and nuisance vegetation found within the preserve areas will be flagged, mapped and reported for treatment. Felled material will be removed from the preserve areas where possible or killed in place where removal would cause extreme damage to the surrounding native areas. Any stumps remaining after the exotic, non-native and nuisance removal will be treated with a U.S. EPA approved herbicide and visible tracer dye to prevent regeneration from the roots. These maintenance activities will be performed in perpetuity as needed. 4.3 PRESERVE DELINEATION Preserves will be clearly delineated with appropriate signage both during and after construction activities. Protective barricades will be used to cordon off construction areas and keep construction equipment out of preserve areas. A double row of silt fence will be used along preserve areas to separate them from the construction activities. The silt fence will remain in place until the perimeter berm is installed around the area of work. Appropriate signage will be placed along the perimeter of the preserves at 100 to 150 foot spacing. 4.4 PRESERVE MANAGEMENT SPECIFICATIONS The preserve area will require exotic and nuisance plant eradication activities as previously noted. The following paragraphs provide additional information and specifications regarding these activities. 4.4.1 Exotic & Nuisance Vegetation Eradication As previously noted, eradication methods will be employed throughout the preserve area. They may include physical removal of exotics and/or directed herbicide applications as dictated by the mitigation feature type and specific conditions and species encountered. Initial exotic and nuisance plant eradication efforts will involve a combination of methods including directed herbicide applications and cutting down exotics with subsequent application of herbicides to the stumps. Non-mechanized exotic and nuisance plant 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 709 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) Creekside Environmental Supplement May 15, 2020 Page 14 of 16 eradication methods will be employed wherever practical in order to preserve the greatest amount of existing native vegetation still present within the preserve areas. Methods include the use of hand implements such as chainsaws and machetes to cut down exotic vegetation with follow-up applications of herbicides as well as directed herbicide applications alone. Areas of exotic eradication handled in this manner will be allowed to recruit naturally for a year before determining if any replanting is necessary. Following initial eradication, subsequent maintenance events will commonly employ non- mechanized exotic and nuisance plant eradication methods. These methods may include directed herbicide applications and/or physical removal of exotics. 4.4.2 Success Criteria The success criterion of this preserve is 80% total coverage of desirable and appropriate plant species in each habitat. If supplemental plantings are required after time zero activities are completed, then there will also be a requirement for 80% survivorship of all plantings. This criterion is already met within the native habitat areas. 4.4.3 Monitoring & Reporting The Creekside East preserve area will be maintained and monitored on an annual basis, with more frequent maintenance events undertaken if vegetation is overrun by any exotics that need more frequent treatment. Monitoring will be conducted within 30 days of a maintenance event, but not prior to 10 days immediately following herbicide application. Any faunal observations, direct or indirect will also be noted and reported during each site visit. Since the preserve area has been deemed impacted by the regulatory agencies, no monitoring or reporting will be required by them. Monitoring summaries will be produced and kept by the property owner for review by the County upon request. 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 710 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) Creekside Environmental Supplement May 15, 2020 Page 15 of 16 5.0 PRESERVE MONITORING PROGRAM The permittee will not submit monitoring reports to the SFWMD or USACE as the preserve area has already been deemed impacted by these agencies. Monitoring summaries will be produced if required by the County which will include the following information: 1. Brief description of maintenance and/or management work performed since the previous monitoring report along with discussion of any other significant occurrences. 2. Brief description of anticipated maintenance/management work to be conducted over the next year. 3. A summary of rainfall data collected during the year preceding the monitoring report based on rainfall data recorded at an onsite station. 4. Photographs documenting conditions in the preserve area at the time of monitoring. Photos will be taken at four permanent photo stations within the on-site Preserve. At least two photos will be taken at each station with the view of each photo always oriented in the same general direction from one year to the next. 5. Other general observations made in various portions of the preserve area. These observations will address potential problem zones, general condition of native vegetation including planted species, wildlife utilization as observed during monitoring, and other pertinent factors. 6. A summary assessment of all data and observations along with recommendations as to actions necessary to help meet management/maintenance goals. 7. A summary of all observed wildlife sightings and evidence of wildlife utilization. 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 711 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) Creekside Environmental Supplement May 15, 2020 Page 16 of 16 6.0 WETLAND MITIGATION PROGRAM The original Creekside East project permitting accounted for impacts to the preserve area so no additional wetland mitigation should be required by the State regulatory agencies. The USACE had previously indicated that the impacts will require additional mitigation and the applicant is proposing to compensate for the wetland impacts via the purchase of 0.47 wetland mitigation credits from the Panther Island Mitigation Bank Expansion. Table 4- UMAM Summary Wetland Habitat FLUCFCS Code Total Acreage Existing UMAM Score Proposed UMAM Score Delta Mitigation Requirement Mixed Wetland Forest 630 1.18 0.40 0.00 -0.40 0.47 Totals 2.30 1.18 1.12 0.47 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 712 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) STATE OF FLORIDACOUNTY AERIAL VICINITY MAPSTATE OF FLORIDACOUNTY AERIAL VICINITY MAPNOTES:<> THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SUBJECTPROPERTYSUBJECTPROPERTY<> LATITUDE:N 26° 16' 15.542"<> LONGITUDE:W 81° 47' 18.663"SITE ADDRESS:<> GOODLETTE FRANK RDNAPLES, FL 34105Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@turrell-associates.com3584 Exchange Ave. Suite B. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\1335-creekside east\CAD\SHEET\PERMIT-FEDERAL\1335-CREEKSIDE-FED.dwg LOCATION MAP 5/12/2020THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY:CHANGED:SHEET NO.:THRMJ09-27-131335RMJ2725CREEKSIDELOCATION MAP48RMJ---09-14-1605-12-20---THTH---REVISED PAGES 02,05,06,08REVISED PAGES 02-07---01 OF 10COLLIER COUNTYCOLLIER COUNTY)7.(1(/':+%1)7.(1(/':+%18588288641MARCOISLANDEVERGLADESCITY9329846NAPLES90908399483783784129292983983992887846951862I-758486431856850846890896NESWKEY WESTTAMPAFT.MYERSMIAMINAPLESSUBJECTPROPERTY9.A.3.cPacket Pg. 713Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment - NESW0100200400SCALE IN FEETTurrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@turrell-associates.com3584 Exchange Ave. Suite B. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\1335-creekside east\CAD\SHEET\PERMIT-FEDERAL\1335-CREEKSIDE-FED.dwg FLUCCS MAP 5/12/2020THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY:CHANGED:SHEET NO.:THRMJ09-27-131335RMJ2725CREEKSIDEFLUCCS MAP48RMJ---09-14-1605-12-20---THTH---REVISED FLUCCSREVISED FLUCCS---02 OF 10·SURVEY COURTESY OF:··SURVEY DATED:NOTES:·THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY ANDARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE."NO SURVEY DATA AVAILABLE"MM-DD-YYYY510411193193630534534743140414GOODLETTE-FRANK RDIMMOKALEE RDSITEPROPERTY174190174814814 FLUCCSCODEDESCRIPTIONAREA(AC)140COMMERCIAL AND SERVICES6.57174MEDICAL AND HEALTH CARE7.19190OPEN LAND2.30193URBAN LAND IN TRANSITION1.78411PINE FLATWOODS1.59414PINE - MESIC OAK1.06510STREAMS AND WATERWAYS0.49534STORMWATER MANAGEMENT LAKE3.06630WETLAND FORESTED MIXED2.30743SPOIL AREAS0.17814ROADS AND HIGHWAYS2.41TOTAL28.929.A.3.cPacket Pg. 714Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment - TLOADINGZONELOADINGZONELOADINGZONE LOADINGZONELOADINGZONE LOADINGZONE NESW0100200400SCALE IN FEETTurrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@turrell-associates.com3584 Exchange Ave. Suite B. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\1335-creekside east\CAD\SHEET\PERMIT-FEDERAL\1335-CREEKSIDE-FED.dwg PROPOSED SITE ON AERIAL 5/12/2020THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY:CHANGED:SHEET NO.:THRMJ09-27-131335RMJ2725CREEKSIDEPROPOSED SITE ON AERIAL48RMJ---09-14-1605-12-20---THTH---REVISED SITEPLANREVISED SITEPLAN---04 of 10PROPOSEDPONDGOODLETTE-FRANK RDIMMOKALEE RDSITEPROPERTYP R E S E R V E PROPOSEDBUILDINGANDPARKINGPOTENTIALDEVELOPMENTAREA9.A.3.cPacket Pg. 715Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment - TLOADINGZONELOADINGZONELOADINGZONE LOADINGZONELOADINGZONE LOADINGZONE NESW0100200400SCALE IN FEETTurrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@turrell-associates.com3584 Exchange Ave. Suite B. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\1335-creekside east\CAD\SHEET\PERMIT-FEDERAL\1335-CREEKSIDE-FED.dwg IMPACTS MAP 5/12/2020THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY:CHANGED:SHEET NO.:THRMJ09-27-131335RMJ2725CREEKSIDEWETLAND IMPACTS MAP48----05-12-20----TH----REVISED SITEPLAN----05 of 10PROPOSEDPONDGOODLETTE-FRANK RDIMMOKALEE RD·SURVEY COURTESY OF:··SURVEY DATED:NOTES:·THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY ANDARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE."NO SURVEY DATA AVAILABLE"MM-DD-YYYY1.18WETLAND IMPACT (AC)SITEPROPERTYWETLANDIMPACTSAREAPROPOSEDBUILDINGANDPARKINGPOTENTIALDEVELOPMENTAREA9.A.3.cPacket Pg. 716Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment - TLOADINGZONELOADINGZONELOADINGZONELOADINGZONELOADINGZONELOADINGZONENESW0100200400SCALE IN FEETTurrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@turrell-associates.com3584 Exchange Ave. Suite B. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\1335-creekside east\CAD\SHEET\PERMIT-FEDERAL\1335-CREEKSIDE-FED.dwg PROPOSED PRESERVE 5/12/2020THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY:CHANGED:SHEET NO.:THRMJ09-27-131335RMJ2725CREEKSIDEPROPOSED PRESERVE48----05-12-20----TH----REVISED SITEPLAN----06 OF 10GOODLETTE-FRANK RDIMMOKALEE RD1.121.53 ·SURVEY COURTESY OF:··SURVEY DATED:NOTES:·THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY ANDARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE."NO SURVEY DATA AVAILABLE"MM-DD-YYYYUPLAND PRESERVE (ACRES):WETLAND PRESERVE (ACRES):TOTAL PRESERVE (ACRES):3.071.121.95SITEPROPERTY0.090.339.A.3.cPacket Pg. 717Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment - NESW0100200400SCALE IN FEETTurrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@turrell-associates.com3584 Exchange Ave. Suite B. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\1335-creekside east\CAD\SHEET\PERMIT-FEDERAL\1335-CREEKSIDE-FED.dwg SOILS MAP 5/12/2020THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY:CHANGED:SHEET NO.:THRMJ09-27-131335-2725CREEKSIDESOILS MAP48-------------------08 OF 10·SURVEY COURTESY OF:··SURVEY DATED:NOTES:·THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY ANDARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.·SOIL DATA PROVIDED BY:1998 UNITED STATES DEPT OF AGRICULTURESOIL SURVEY OF COLLIER COUNTY AREA, FL"NO SURVEY DATA AVAILABLE"MM-DD-YYYYCODEDESCRIPTIONHYDRIC7IMMOKALEE FINE SAND17BASINGER FINE SANDYES20FT. DRUM AND MALABAR, HIGH, FINESANDS39SATELLITE FINE SAND7201739SITEPROPERTY9.A.3.cPacket Pg. 718Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment - NESW0100200400SCALE IN FEETTurrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@turrell-associates.com3584 Exchange Ave. Suite B. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\1335-creekside east\CAD\SHEET\PERMIT-FEDERAL\1335-CREEKSIDE-FED.dwg SPECIES MAP 5/12/2020THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY:CHANGED:SHEET NO.:THRMJ09-27-131335RMJ2725CREEKSIDESPECIES MAP48----04-14-20----TH----REVISED SITEPLAN----09 of 10GOODLETTE-FRANK RDIMMOKALEE RD SITEPROPERTY*XTRI COLORED HERONTYPICAL TRANSECT*CAVITY TREESSNOWY EGRETWHITE IBISX9.A.3.cPacket Pg. 719Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment - THREATENED AND ENDANGERED SPECIES SURVEY CREEKSIDE EAST 2600 Golden Gate Parkway Naples, FL 34105 updated MARCH 2020 PREPARED BY: TURRELL, HALL & ASSOCIATES, INC 3584 EXCHANGE AVENUE, STE B NAPLES, FL 34104 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 720 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) CREEKSIDE EAST THREATENED AND ENDANGERED SPECIES SURVEY MARCH 2020 2 I. INTRODUCTION The Creekside East project encompasses a total of approximately 28.9 acres. The property is located in section 27, township 48 South, and Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. The owner is considering development of the parcel associated with the Creekside Commerce Park Commercial Planned Unit Development. The project parcel is located on the southeast corner of Immokalee Rd. and Goodlette Frank Rd. intersection, in North Naples. The project is bordered to the north by Immokalee Rd., the west by Goodlette Frank Rd., the south by the North Collier water treatment facility and the Pelican Marsh PUD, and to the east by additional commercial development. The intent of this report is to provide a summary of wildlife observations on the property and to consider potential effects of the proposed project on any local, state or federal listed species that may utilize the property for feeding/foraging and/or nesting. This survey updates a 2008 protected species survey conducted by Johnson Engineering and 2013 and 2015 surveys conducted by Turrell, Hall and Associates. This latest survey update was specific to observations for Florida bonneted bat roosts. II. METHODOLOGY Prior to any wildlife survey, careful consideration is given to the habitat type/s in question and species that are known to utilize such areas. Thus, before any survey is carried out a number of publications and references are consulted. These include: The Official Lists of Florida’s Endangered Species, Florida Game and Freshwater Fish Commission (FGFWFC) Wildlife Methodology Guidelines, Survey Protocol for SFWMD projects, Collier County aerial research, US Fish and Wildlife listed species survey protocols, and the Florida Natural Areas Inventory (FNAI) for Collier County. The basic objective of any wildlife survey is to obtain evidence that a listed species is using the subject site. The site may comprise a primary or secondary feeding/foraging or nesting zone or merely be adjacent to those sites for a particular listed species. As many species of concern in Florida are cryptic/camouflaged and/or nocturnal/crepuscular, patience and sufficient time must be devoted to the survey. Aerial photos and FLUCFCS mapping of the site and surrounding area were consulted before arriving on-site and after thorough consideration of the existing habitats a potential list of species that could be found on-site was developed. A system of linear transects was followed along essentially an east-west orientation throughout the subject property. Transects were walked during both morning and afternoon time frames to examine the site. Particular emphasis was put on looking for evidence of tree cavities as well as fox squirrels, gopher tortoises, indigo snakes, other species that have the potential to occur. Biologists traversed the site in a series of linear transects spaced approximately 40 to 60 feet apart. 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 721 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) CREEKSIDE EAST THREATENED AND ENDANGERED SPECIES SURVEY MARCH 2020 3 Fieldwork took place in September 2013, October 2015, September 2016, and more recently updated February 2020. Approximately 30 hours have been spent on the site to date devoted to wildlife survey. The October 2016 update was to survey the site for cavity trees that could potentially support bonneted bat roosting. The recent 2020 survey was conducted to review the cavities located in 2016 and search for any additional if present. Two cavities located in oak trees and one cavity in a dead cabbage palm tree were observed. All three were peeped and no evidence of bat roosting was observed. A list of survey dates, times, and ambient weather conditions is provided below. SURVEY DATE TIMES SURVEYED TEMP (ºF) WIND (MPH) WEATHER 09/09/2013 0700 – 1000 75 5-10 Clear 09/11/2013 1500 – 1800 80 15-20 Cloudy 09/18/2013 0700 – 1000 75 0 - 5 Partly cloudy 09/24/2013 1530 – 1830 75 15 – 25 Cloudy / Rain 10/08/2015 1600 - 1930 85 5-10 Clear 10/17/2015 0700 - 1000 74 5-10 Partly Cloudy 9/02/2016 0800-1100 77 10-15 Cloudy 09/05/2016 0700-1000 73 Calm Clear 01/24/2020 0700-1000 64 Calm Clear 02/22/2020 0700-0900 58 15-20 Partly Cloudy A slow pace was walked throughout the entire site, stopping every few minutes to look and listen for movement or calls of any animal. Indirect evidence such as rootings, scrape marks, nests, cavities, burrows, tracks and scat were looked for and noted. III. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION A list of protected species that could be expected to occur on the subject site can be given through analysis of known vegetative communities both on-site and contiguous to the site and available background data. Sources include the Fish and Wildlife Service Multi Species Recovery Plan, Part 2, Appendix C, Species of Concern and their Respective Community Types in South Florida, in addition to communication with personnel at state and federal wildlife agencies. Vegetative communities are presented by FLUCFCS codes together with potential listed wildlife species. Consideration of the suitability and likelihood for a given community to support a particular species is given in light of adjacent and contiguous land uses. Abbreviations used in the discussion are as follows; 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 722 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) CREEKSIDE EAST THREATENED AND ENDANGERED SPECIES SURVEY MARCH 2020 4 Vegetative Species Abbreviations Stratum Abundance C = Canopy C = Common M = Midstory O = Occasional G = Groundcover R = Rare Listed Species Abbreviations F = Federal C = Federal Candidate S = State *= FWS Species of Management Concern E = Endangered R = Rare T = Threatened SSC = Florida Species of Special Concern FLUCFCS CODE 193 Urban Land Common Name Scientific Name Stratum Abundance Bahia grass Paspalum notatum G C Smooth buttonweed Spermacoce assurgens G O Frog fruit Phyla nodiflora G C Mexican clover Richardia grandiflora G R The following species are common within this community type and can potentially be found there; Gopher Tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus), Sandhill Crane (Grus canadensis pratensis, ST), Audubons Crested Caracara (Polyborus plancus audubinii, FT, ST), Eastern Indigo Snake (Drymarchon corais couperi, FT, ST). FLUCFCS CODE 411 (E1) Pine Flatwoods (<25% exotics) Common Name Scientific Name Stratum Abundance Slash pine Pinus elliotti C C Cabbage palm Sabal palmetto M/C O Laurel oak Quercus laurifolia C O Ear-leaf acacia Acacia auriculiformis M/C R Melaleuca Melaleuca quinquenervia M/C O Brazilian pepper Schinus terebinthifolius M O Downy rose-myrtle Rhodomyrtus tomentosa M C Myrsine Rapanea punctata M C Gallberry Ilex glabra M C Wax myrtle Myrica cerifera M C Saw palmetto Serenoa repens M C Greenbriar Smilax spp. V C Muscadine grape Vitis rotundifolia V C The following potential species are common within the community type Pine Flatwoods; Gopher Tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus), Florida Weasel (Mustela frenaata peninsulae, 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 723 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) CREEKSIDE EAST THREATENED AND ENDANGERED SPECIES SURVEY MARCH 2020 5 R), Big Cypress Fox Squirrel (Sciurus niger avicennia, *), Florida Black Bear (Ursus americanus floridanus, FC, ST), Florida Panther (Puma concolor coryi, FE, SE), White Ibis (Eudocimus albus, SSC), Sandhill Crane (Grus canadensis pratensis, ST), Bald Eagle (Haliaetus leucocephalus, FT, ST), Red Cockaded Woodpecker (Picoides borealis, FE, ST), Audubons Crested Caracara (Polyborus plancus audubinii, FT, ST), Eastern Indigo Snake (Drymarchon corais couperi, FT, ST). Of the above potential listed species, none were observed on this or surrounding parcels during the course of this survey. There is a slight possibility for utilization by gopher tortoise, indigo snake, and fox squirrel; however, the amount of directly adjacent traffic and lack of continuity with other undeveloped parcels significantly minimizes that potential. FLUCFCS CODE 510 and 534 Canal and Pond Common Name Scientific Name Stratum Abundance Primrose willow Ludwigia peruviana M R Carolina willow Salix caroliniana M R Torpedo grass Panicum repens G C Pennywort Hydrocotyle umbellata G O Arrowhead Sagittaria lancifolia G O Spikerush Eleocharis cellulosa G O This community type generally supports foraging activities of listed wading birds such as American Alligator (Alligator mississippiensis SSC, FT S/A), White Ibis (Eudocimus albus, SSC), Sandhill Crane (Grus canadensis pratensis, ST), Limpkin (Aramus guarauna, SSC), Wood Stork (Mycteria americana, FE, SE), Little Blue Heron (Egretta caerulea SSC), Snowy Egret (Egretta thula SSC), Tri-colored Heron (Egretta tricolor SSC) Of the above potential listed species, only the tri-colored heron was observed foraging along the lake bank. White ibis and snowy egret were also observed perched in trees adjacent to the lake. It is probable that several other species will also utilize the shorelines for foraging activities over the course of the year. The Johnson Engineering survey from 2008 documented an alligator within the existing stormwater pond. Recognition that some species may utilize the site along with proper management to prevent impacts associated with this development proposal should be incorporated into the final species management plan for the property. FLUCFCS CODE 630 Wetland mixed forest Common Name Scientific Name Stratum Abundance Cypress Taxodium distichum C C Cabbage palm Sabal palmetto M/C O Laurel oak Quercus laurifolia C O 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 724 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) CREEKSIDE EAST THREATENED AND ENDANGERED SPECIES SURVEY MARCH 2020 6 Carolina willow Salix caroliniana M O Pond Apple Annona glabra M C Brazilian pepper Schinus terebinthifolius M R Buttonbush Cephalanthus occidentalis M O Myrsine Rapanea punctata M R Swamp lily Crinum americanum G C Leather fern Acrostichum danaeifolium G O Swamp fern Blechnum serrulatum G C This community type generally supports foraging activities of many listed wading birds such as White Ibis (Eudocimus albus, SSC), Little Blue Heron (Egretta caerulea SSC), Snowy Egret (Egretta thula SSC), and Tri-colored Heron (Egretta tricolor SSC). In addition, the following potential species are also possible within this community type; Florida Weasel (Mustela frenaata peninsulae, R), Big Cypress Fox Squirrel (Sciurus niger avicennia, *), Florida Black Bear (Ursus americanus floridanus, FC, ST), Florida Panther (Puma concolor coryi, FE, SE). As documented above, none of these species were observed within this community during the survey efforts. The amount of directly adjacent traffic and isolation of this parcel due to the lack of continuity with other undeveloped parcels significantly minimizes the potential that listed species will utilize the site. A list of all wildlife species observed on or adjacent to the site is provided below. Common Name Scientific Name Fish and Aquatic Invertebrates Mosquito fish Gambusia affinis Least killifish Heterandria formosa Golden topminnow Fundulus chrysotus Sailfin molly Poecilia latipinna Sunfish Lepomis spp. Walking catfish Clarias batrachus Unidentified cichlids Reptiles & Amphibians Cuban treefrog Osteopilus septentrionalis Green treefrog Hyla cinerea Eastern narrowmouth toad Gastrophryne carolinensis Florida cooter Pseudemys floridana Florida soft-shelled turtle Apalone ferox Green anole Anolis carolinensis Birds Anhinga * Anhinga anhinga 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 725 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) CREEKSIDE EAST THREATENED AND ENDANGERED SPECIES SURVEY MARCH 2020 7 Snowy egret Egretta thula Tricolored heron Egretta tricolor Green-backed heron Butorides striatus White ibis Eudocimus albus Cattle egret Bubulcus ibis Mourning Dove Zenaida macroura Red-bellied woodpecker Melanerpes carolinus Cardinal Cardinalis cardinalis Red shouldered hawk* Buteo lineatus Turkey Vulture * Cathartes aura Mockingbird Mimus polyglottos Unidentified warblers Mammals Nine-banded armadillo Dasypus novemcinctus Marsh rabbit (scat and tracks) Sylvilagus palustris Grey squirrel Sciurus carolinensis Raccoon (tracks) Procyon lotor * Observed on adjacent properties or flying overhead. IV. SUMMARY As can be seen from the list above, this site supports a very limited amount of wildlife, consisting mostly of transient and generalist species. The site is located next to a major intersection and confined by commercial, residential, and industrial properties. At the time of the initial September 2013 survey, extremely high rainfall amounts from the past month had the site completely inundated with between 2 to 8 inches of water. This served to concentrate species along the higher perimeter regions of the site. The 2015 and 2016 follow up surveys were done only on the small wetland area and adjacent stormwater pond as the rest of the site was under construction. Likewise, this 2020 update also concentrated solely on the forested and lake portion of the site. The property is outside of the buffer zones for any known bald eagle nests. No evidence of bald eagles or bald eagle nest construction was observed during the course of this or any previous survey. The property is within the 18.6 mile core foraging area for the Corkscrew wood stork rookery. No wood stork foraging was observed during the survey but it is possible that periodic wood stork and other wading bird foraging may be occurring along the canal and lake shorelines. This activity will be able to continue with the proposed development so no adverse impacts to these species are expected. No evidence of any potential bonneted bat roosting sites was observed during the survey. This survey also concentrated on the small wetland area and was specifically aimed at locating potential FBB roost sites. While three cavities were observed and peeped, no evidence of any FBB roosting activity was observed. 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 726 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) CREEKSIDE EAST THREATENED AND ENDANGERED SPECIES SURVEY MARCH 2020 8 No listed plants were observed during the survey. It is our opinion that the development of this site with appropriate management and educational guidelines in place, will not adversely affect any endangered, threatened or otherwise protected species. These guidelines for management will be coordinated with the appropriate local, state, and federal agencies to better ensure their protection. 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 727 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) Creekside Commerce Park East Mixed Use Subdistrict (PL20190002849) Exhibit V.D Growth Management December 22, 2020 Page 1 of 4 BCCPUD-19 Exhibit VD Growth Management-r2.docx Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, FL 34134  239-947-1144  engineering@gradyminor.com  www.gradyminor.com The proposed small-scale plan amendment contemplates establishment of the Creekside Commerce Park East Mixed Use Subdistrict. The new subdistrict will provide a maximum of 300 multi-family rental apartments in addition to the non-residential uses presently permitted in the B District within the Creekside Commerce Center CPUD. Under Chapter 163 F.S., local governments are authorized to adopt and amend their comprehensive plans. Staff has requested that the applicant address three sections from Chapter 163. Chapter 163.3167 Scope of act.— (9) Each local government shall address in its comprehensive plan, as enumerated in this chapter, the water supply sources necessary to meet and achieve the existing and projected water use demand for the established planning period, considering the applicable plan developed pursuant to s. 373.709. The project is provided potable water service by Collier County. Collier County has sufficient water supply sources necessary to meet and achieve the existing and projected water use demand for the established planning period, considering the surplus capacity projected in Table 6-1 of the Ten-Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan, dated February 2019 and adopted by the Board of County Commissioners on May 14, 2019 (Ordinance No. 2019-06). Chapter 163.3177 (6) (a) 2. The future land use plan and plan amendments shall be based upon surveys, studies, and data regarding the area, as applicable, including: a. The amount of land required to accommodate anticipated growth. b. The projected permanent and seasonal population of the area. c. The character of undeveloped land. d. The availability of water supplies, public facilities, and services. e. The need for redevelopment, including the renewal of blighted areas and the elimination of nonconforming uses which are inconsistent with the character of the community. f. The compatibility of uses on lands adjacent to or closely proximate to military installations. g. The compatibility of uses on lands adjacent to an airport as defined in s. 330.35 and consistent with s. 333.02. h. The discouragement of urban sprawl. i. The need for job creation, capital investment, and economic development that will strengthen and diversify the community’s economy. j. The need to modify land uses and development patterns within antiquated subdivisions. Chapter 163.3177 8. Future land use map amendments shall be based upon the following analyses: a. An analysis of the availability of facilities and services. b. An analysis of the suitability of the plan amendment for its proposed use considering the 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 728 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) Page 2 of 4 character of the undeveloped land, soils, topography, natural resources, and historic resources on site. c. An analysis of the minimum amount of land needed to achieve the goals and requirements of this section. The Creekside Commerce Park East Mixed Use Subdistrict is consistent with Chapter 163.3177, F.S. The applicant has identified a deficit in the multi-family rental apartment market in this area of north Naples. The map prepared by Collier County clearly demonstrates that there are no rental apartment complexes within two miles of the subject property. Further, within ¼ mile of the property are two major regional employers, Arthrex and North Naples Community Hospital. The proposed multi-family rental apartments will provide much needed housing opportunities in close proximity to these two large scale employers, as well as other employment centers in the vicinity with very good access to the major roads such as U.S. 41 and I-75. The subject property is zoned for commercial, retail, office and hotel land uses. Water and sewer services are available at the property. The proposed subdistrict represents infill development and is not inconsistent or incompatible with the character of the area. While not a designated Activity Center, the Creekside Commerce Park PUD functionally is similar to an Activity Center. The addition of multi-family apartments complements the employment opportunities within the PUD and nearby vicinity. Potable water and wastewater service will be provided by Collier County. 163.3184 Process for adoption of comprehensive plan or plan amendment. This section of the statute outlines the process and authority for agency review of plan amendments. The applicant understands that regional and state reviewing agencies will be responsible for review of any comprehensive plan amendments per the requirements of Chapter 163.3184 F.S. The applicant’s experts are of the opinion that there are no regional or state impacts associated with the application. Project Justification Future Land Use Element: The 9.9± small-scale amendment area is designated Urban Residential, Urban Mixed Use Residential on the Future Land Use Map. The proposed Creekside Commerce Park East Mixed Use Subdistrict will permit multi-family residential consistent with the proposed subdistrict as well as non-residential uses currently permitted in the Creekside Commerce Park CPUD. There is a demonstrated lack of rental apartments in this area of North Naples and within close proximity to this major employment center. 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 729 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) Page 3 of 4 The proposed location which is the subject of the small-scale growth management plan amendment and the PUD amendment fulfills these criteria. In addition, there is a lack of available vacant properties in this geographic area. Policies 5.3 and 5.4 of the Future Land Use Element require that rezoning must be consistent with the Growth Management Plan. Upon approval of the companion small-scale growth management plan amendment, which will establish the Creekside Commerce Park East Mixed Use Subdistrict, the proposed PUD amendment may be deemed consistent with the Growth Management Plan. Policies 5.5 and 5.7 of the Future Land Use Element discourage urban sprawl by confining urban intensities of development to those areas designated Urban on the Future Land Use Map. The PUD amendment represents infill development, in an area having immediate access to urban services. Policy 5.6 requires that new developments shall be compatible with and complementary to the surrounding land uses as set forth in the Land Development Code. The proposed uses are consistent with those commercial uses currently permitted on the property. Development will include appropriate buffers and other development standards to ensure that the uses developed on the property will be compatible with the residential uses located immediately west of the PUD. A landscape buffer currently exists and was installed concurrent with development of the assisted living facility, which has been developed on the northern portion of the site. Properties to the south are and developed with a self-storage facility and regional wastewater treatment plant. The companion PUD document and Master Plan also include conditions and development standards which will ensure the multi-family rental apartments will be compatible with adjacent development. Objective 7 and the implementing policies promote interconnection with adjoining neighborhoods and streets. The project has direct access to both Goodlette-Frank Road and Immokalee Road. There are no available connections to the east due to the presence of existing development and the County Park boundary. Connections to the south are not feasible due to the recorded on-site preserve area and the presence of the County’s regional wastewater treatment plant. Transportation Element: Policy 5.1 requires that all projects are evaluated to determine their effect on the overall countywide density or intensity of permissible development, with consideration of their impact on the overall County transportation system, and shall not approve any petition or application that would directly access a deficient roadway segment as identified in the current AUIR or if it impacts an adjacent roadway segment that is deficient as identified in the current AUIR. The CPUD amendment application includes a comprehensive assessment of the transportation impacts associated with the project. Public Facilities Element: The property is served by potable water and sanitary sewer services. Water and wastewater are provided by Collier County Utilities. No capacity issues have been identified or are anticipated in the future. The site will require a modification of a previously issued South Florida Water Management District permit for improvements related to the proposed commercial uses on a portion of the site. 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 730 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) Page 4 of 4 Conservation and Coastal Management Element: Policy 6.1.1 requires that mixed use developments containing native vegetation communities must retain a minimum of 25% of the existing native vegetation on-site for mixed use or commercial developments. The site has previously been developed and infrastructure has been installed throughout the development tracts of the PUD. 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 731 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) IntegraRealtyResources SouthwestFlorida ApartmentSupply/DemandStudy ProposedCreeksideApartmentsSite MultifamilyProperty SECImmokaleeRdandGoodletteFrankRd Naples,CollierCounty,Florida34110 PreparedFor: BarronCollierCompanies EffectiveDateoftheAppraisal: July22,2020 ReportFormat: MarketStudy–StandardFormat IRRͲSouthwestFlorida FileNumber:152Ͳ2020Ͳ0173 EXHIBIT V.D1 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 732 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict)   ProposedCreeksideApartmentsSite SECImmokaleeRdandGoodletteFrankRd Naples,Florida  9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 733 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) IntegraRealtyResourcesInMiami/CaribbeanInOrlandoInNaples/Sarasota Miami/Caribbean Orlando SouthwestFlorida DadelandCentre 9155SouthDadelandBlvd. Suite1208 TheMagnoliaBuilding 326N.MagnoliaAve.  HorseshoeProfessionalPark 2770HorseshoeDriveS. Suite3 Miami,FL33156Orlando,FL32801Naples,FL34104 www.irr.com(305)670Ͳ0001(407)843Ͳ3377(239)Ͳ643Ͳ6888  September29,2020   AustinHowell BarronCollierCompanies 2600GoldenGateParkway Naples,FL34104  SUBJECT:ApartmentSupply/DemandStudy ProposedCreeksideApartmentsSite SECImmokaleeRdandGoodletteFrankRd Naples,CollierCounty,Florida34110 IRRͲSouthwestFloridaFileNo.152Ͳ2020Ͳ0173  DearMr.Howell: IntegraRealtyResources–SouthwestFloridahasconductedamarketsupplyanddemand studyforaproposedapartmentcommunitytobelocatednearthesoutheastcornerof ImmokaleeRoadandGoodletteFrankRoadintheNaplesareaofCollierCounty. TheclientfortheassignmentisBarronCollierCompanies,andthepurposeofthe assignmentistoprovideamarketsupply/demandstudywhichwouldincludethefollowing: detailedexistinginventoryinformation,newinventoryinleaseup,futureinventoryunder construction,approvedandproposedprojects,andcurrentdemandforadditionalproduct andexpectedabsorptionrates.Theintendeduseofthereportistoassisttheclientwith internaldecisionsrelatingtothepossibledevelopmentofthepropertywithamidͲrise multiͲfamily,forrentproject.Theappraisal,asapplicable,isintendedtoconformwiththe UniformStandardsofProfessionalAppraisalPractice(USPAP),theCodeofProfessional EthicsandStandardsofProfessionalAppraisalPracticeoftheAppraisalInstitute,and applicablestateappraisalregulations. TheproposedmultifamilyprojectistobelocatedalongtheSECofImmokaleeRdand GoodletteͲFrankeRdNintheNorthNaplesareaofCollierCounty.Thissubjectsite representsonlyaportionofalargerparenttract.Theparenttractiscurrentlyzonedaspart oftheCreeksideCommerceParkCommercialPlannedUnitDevelopment,whichallowsfora 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 734 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) AustinHowell BarronCollierCompanies September29,2020 Page2 widevarietyofcommercialusesinclusiveofmultifamily.Thesubjectsitewillconsistof approximately10.0acres.MidtohighͲrisecondominiumdevelopmentswithstructured parkinggarageshavehigherdensitiesinͲlinewiththesubject'sproposeddevelopmentand density.Thesubject'sproposeduseisfor300units. KǀĞƌĂůů͕ƚŚĞĚĂƚĂŐĂƚŚĞƌĞĚĨƌŽŵƚŚĞŵĂƌŬĞƚŝŶĚŝĐĂƚĞƐƐƵƉƉŽƌƚĨŽƌĂĚĚŝƚŝŽŶĂůƐƵƉƉůLJǁŝƚŚŝŶ ƚŚĞŵĂƌŬĞƚ͘DƵůƚŝĨĂŵŝůLJĂƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚƚƌĞŶĚƐŚĂǀĞďĞĞŶƐƚƌŽŶŐŽǀĞƌƚŚĞƉĂƐƚƚŚƌĞĞLJĞĂƌƐĂŶĚ ĂƌĞƉƌŽũĞĐƚĞĚƚŽƌĞŵĂŝŶƉŽƐŝƚŝǀĞŝŶƚŽƚŚĞĨŽƌĞƐĞĞĂďůĞĨƵƚƵƌĞ͘dŚĞƌĞĂƌĞƐĞǀĞƌĂůƉƌŽũĞĐƚƐ ƵŶĚĞƌĐŽŶƐƚƌƵĐƚŝŽŶ͕ĂƐǁĞůůĂƐ͕ƐĞǀĞƌĂůƉƌŽƉŽƐĞĚƉƌŽƉĞƌƚŝĞƐĨŽƌƚŚĞƉƌŝŵĂƌLJŵĂƌŬĞƚƉůĂŶŶĞĚ͖ ŚŽǁĞǀĞƌ͕ĂƐƚŚĞĞĐŽŶŽŵLJĐŽŶƚŝŶƵĞƐƚŽƌĞĐŽǀĞƌ͕ŶĞǁũŽďŐƌŽǁƚŚŝƐĞdžƉĞĐƚĞĚƚŽŚĞůƉ ĐŽŶƚŝŶƵĞƚŽĨƵĞůĚĞŵĂŶĚĨŽƌĂĚĚŝƚŝŽŶĂůƐƵƉƉůLJ͘/ŶĂĚĚŝƚŝŽŶ͕ƚŚĞƐƵďũĞĐƚ͛ƐůŽĐĂƚŝŽŶĂůĂŶĚ ĚĞŵŽŐƌĂƉŚŝĐŝŶĚŝĐĂƚŝŽŶƐƉƌŽǀŝĚĞƉŽƐŝƚŝǀĞƐƵƉƉŽƌƚĂŶĚƚŚĞƐƵďũĞĐƚŝƐĂŶƚŝĐŝƉĂƚĞĚƚŽĐĂƉƚƵƌĞ ŽƌĂƚƚƌĂĐƚĚĞŵĂŶĚƚŚĂƚŝƐŶŽƚĐƵƌƌĞŶƚůLJďĞŝŶŐƌĞĐŽŐŶŝnjĞĚǁŝƚŚŝŶƚŚĞŵĂƌŬĞƚ͘ TheconclusionsofthestudyaresummarizedintheExecutiveSummaryonthefollowing pages.Ouropinionisqualifiedbycertainassumptions,limitingconditionsanddefinitions, whicharesetforthinthisreport. Asofthedateofvalue,theeconomy(globally,nationally,andlocally)wasinastateofrapid transitionwithawidespreadexpectationoftheimminentonsetofasignificantrecession. TheoutbreakofCOVIDͲ19(coronavirusdiseaseof2019)inChinawasdeclaredaglobal pandemicbytheWorldHealthOrganization(WHO)onMarch11,2020.Somemarket deteriorationhadoccurredshortlybeforethisdate,butthedeclarationbytheWHOsoon ledtomunicipalandstatewideordersto“shelterinplace,”causingwidespreadclosuresof businessesandamassivedisruptiontogeneralcommerce.Thestatusofeconomic conditionsischangingrapidly,creatinggreatuncertaintyinthemarkets.Ouranalysisof theseandrelatedissuesispresentedintheattachedreport.Thevalueexpressedherein representsouropinionbasedonthebestavailabledatareflectiveasofthedateofvalue. Whilevaluesarealwayssubjecttochangeovertime,wecautionthereaderthatinthe currenteconomicclimate,marketvolatilitycreatesthepotentialforamoresignificant changeinvalueoverarelativelyshortperiodoftime. Ifyouhaveanyquestionsorcomments,pleasecontacttheundersigned.Thankyouforthe opportunitytobeofservice. Respectfullysubmitted, IntegraRealtyResourcesͲSouthwestFlorida JulianL.H.StokesII,MAI FLStateͲCertifiedGeneralRE AppraiserRZ3537 Telephone:239Ͳ643Ͳ6888Ext.432 Email:jlstokes@irr.com CarltonJ.Lloyd,MAI FLStateͲCertifiedGeneralRE AppraiserRZ2618 Telephone:239Ͳ643Ͳ6888Ext.410 Email:clloyd@irr.com 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 735 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) TableofContents ProposedCreeksideApartmentsSite ExecutiveSummary1 GeneralInformation5 IdentificationofSubject5 EconomicAnalysis8 CollierCountyAreaAnalysis8 SurroundingAreaAnalysis16 PropertyAnalysis23 LandDescriptionandAnalysis23 MultifamilyMarketAnalysis31 MetroAreaOverview31 SubmarketOverview34 PrimaryCompetition38 ComparableInformationandRentalTrends 45 UnderConstructionProperties47 ProposedProperties50 DemandAnalysis52 Certification56 AssumptionsandLimitingConditions57 Addenda A. AppraiserQualifications B. Definitions C. FinancialsandPropertyInformation 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 736 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) ExecutiveSummary1 ProposedCreeksideApartmentsSite ExecutiveSummary MarketUncertaintyfromNovelCoronavirus(COVIDͲ19) TheoutbreakoftheNovelCoronavirus(COVIDͲ19),declaredanoutbreakbytheWorldHealth Organization(WHO)onJanuary30,2020andsubsequentlyreclassifiedasaworldwidepandemicon March11,2020,hascreatedsubstantialuncertaintyintheworldwidefinancialmarkets.Concerns abouttheongoingspreadoftheCOVIDͲ19(Corona)Virushaveresultedincancellationsofa substantialnumberofbusinessmeetings,conferences,andsportingandentertainmenteventsinthe coming3Ͳ6months;theimplementationofpersonalquarantineprocedures;a30ͲdaylockͲoutfor travelfrommostofEuropetotheU.S.;andsubstantialreductions(andrestrictions)inothertravelby air,rail,bus,andship. Asoftheeffectivedateofthisreport,tourism,lodging,andtouristͲrelatedfoodandbeverageand retailsectorsarelikelytofeelthefirstnegativeeffectsduetothesubstantialdeclineinsocial movementandactivity.Aprolongedoutbreakcouldhaveasignificant(andyetunquantifiable)impact onotherrealestatesectors.Ourvaluationisbaseduponthebestinformationasoftheeffectivedate. Giventhedegreeofoveralluncertaintypresentintheeconomy,forecastsandprojectionscontained hereinmaychangedramatically,ordifferentlythanprojectedunderstablemarketconditions. Therefore,werecommendamorefrequentreviewofthisvaluation,andadvisetheintendeduserto considerthecurrentlackofoveralleconomicstabilityinevaluatingtheuseandreliabilityofthe opinionsexpressedherein. TheproposedmultifamilyprojectistobelocatedalongtheSECofImmokaleeRdandGoodletteͲ FrankeRdNintheNorthNaplesareaofCollierCounty.Thissubjectsiterepresentsonlyaportionofa largerparenttract.TheparenttractiscurrentlyzonedaspartoftheCreeksideCommercePark CommercialPlannedUnitDevelopment,whichallowsforawidevarietyofcommercialusesinclusive ofmultifamily.Thesubjectsitewillconsistofapproximately10.0acres.MidtohighͲrisecondominium developmentswithstructuredparkinggarageshavehigherdensitiesinͲlinewiththesubject's proposeddevelopmentanddensity.Thesubject'sproposeduseisfor300units. Thisassignmentassumesthattheproposeddevelopmentwillbeconstructedofgoodquality materialsanddevelopedtocurrentmarketstandardsofa“ClassA/B”apartmentcommunity,likethat ofcompetingpropertiesinthesurroundingarea.Asdiscussedlaterinthisanalysis,timeisofthe essenceregardingcommencementofconstruction.Whilemultifamilytrendshavebeenstrongand areprojectedtoremainstrongovertheshortͲandlongͲtermprojections,commencementof constructionwouldeliminatethethreatofadditionalsupplyfromenteringthemarket,whichcould affectinitialleaseͲupoftheproject. Thepurposeoftheassignmentistoprovideamarketsupply/demandstudywhichwouldincludethe following:detailedexistinginventoryinformation,newinventoryinleaseup,futureinventoryunder construction,approvedandproposedprojects,andcurrentdemandforadditionalproductand expectedabsorptionrates.Theintendeduseofthereportistoassisttheclientwithinternaldecisions relatingtothepossibledevelopmentofthepropertywithamidͲrisemultiͲfamily,forrentproject. Overall,thedatagatheredfromthemarketindicatessupportforadditionalsupplywithinthemarket. Multifamilyapartmenttrendshavebeenstrongoverthepastthreeyearsandareprojectedtoremain 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 737 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) ExecutiveSummary2 ProposedCreeksideApartmentsSite positiveintotheforeseeablefuture.Thereareseveralprojectsunderconstruction,aswellas,several proposedpropertiesfortheprimarymarketplanned;however,astheeconomycontinuestorecover, newjobgrowthisexpectedtohelpcontinuetofueldemandforadditionalsupply.Inaddition,the subject’slocationalanddemographicindicationsprovidepositivesupportandthesubjectis anticipatedtocaptureorattractdemandthatisnotcurrentlybeingrecognizedwithinthemarket. Strengths,Weaknesses,Opportunities,Threats(SWOTAnalysis) Strengths x BuiltindemandwithlocationincloseproximitytoNaplesCommunityHospital,Landmark Hospital,Arthrex,andvariousotheremploymentareasinthesurroundingareas; x LocationinNorthNaplesiswelllocatedandcentralizedwithinthemarketarea; x Closeproximitytobeachesandmajorcommercialcorridors. Weaknesses x ThelandareamayimpacttheavailabilityofamenitiestypicaltogardenͲstylemultifamilyin thesurroundingmarketareas; x Thelandareamayimpactunitsizestobeonthesmallerside. Opportunities x Futurerentalincreaseswithlowervacancyasthesurroundingareascontinuetogrow. Threats x TheimpactofCOVIDͲ19oneconomicconditionsisconsideredthroughoutthisappraisal.The MarketAnalysissectionlooksatthebestavailableempiricaldatawhilethevaluationsections turntoparallelswithpriorrecessionsalongwithrealtimedatasourcesthatprovideguidance oninputmetricsappliedwithinthevariousapproaches. Ourfindingsandrecommendationsrelativetotheproposedsubjectandmarketarefurther summarizedonthefollowingpage. 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 738 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) ExecutiveSummary3 ProposedCreeksideApartmentsSite SummaryandRecommendations TheproposedprojectisuniqueinSouthwestFloridaasamidͲriserentalproperty.Assuchthereisno harddatawithwhichtoanalyzethemidͲrisedesign.Basedondiscussionswithlocalbrokersand developersintheSouthwestFloridamarketarea,therewouldbedemandforthisproducttypegiven thelackofsupplysurroundingthesubject’slocation.Demandiscreatedbythelocalworkforce lookingforthelocationalconveniencetothemajorthoroughfares’commercialcorridors;aswellas ArthrexandNaplesCommunityHospital,twolargebusinessesthatsurroundthesubject’slocation. Overall,eachperson/companysurveyedwasinfavorofthistypeofdevelopmentinthesubjectarea. Concernsincludedthepotentialforlackofamenitiesthataretypicallyassociatedwiththesetypesof development;however,thelocationwithproximitytooffsiteentertainment,aswellasproximityto employment,wasgenerallythoughttooffsetanypotentiallackofamenities. Someintervieweesnotedthepotentialforthepropertytobedesignedandsoldcondominiumunits. Howevercompetitivecondominiumstypicallyarepartofalargercommunitythatprovidesamenities. Therearesomelimitedcondominiumprojectson“infill”sitesbutthosearetypicallywaterfrontorare locatedintheDowntownNaplesredevelopmentdistrict.Althoughtheideaforapartmentrentalsat thesubjectlocationiswidelyacceptedasa“greatidea”,analternativeascondominiumscouldbe considered.Additionalfactorsthatwouldimpactsalespricingwouldbegovernmentapproval,units’ sizes&finishes,andviews.Basedonourregionalexperienceinlargermetropolitanareas,one examplebeingtheeastcoast(FtLauderdale,Miami,etc.),somedevelopershavebuiltcondominium rentalunitsinwhichthedeveloperorsecondaryownershipmaintainsownershipandoperatesa rentalprogramwithinthedevelopment.However,giventhelimitationsofthesubjectsite,any condominiumprojectwouldlikelysellatpriceslowerthancomparablecondominiumunitsin amenitizedcommunitiesand/ortheDowntownNaplesRedevelopmentDistrict. Basedonourresearch,wehaveidentifiedsevenapartmentcommunities(withinthesurrounding area)thatwilldirectlycompetewiththesubject.Sixofthesesevencommunitiesarestabilizedwhile theoneisintheleaseͲupstage.Wehavealsoanalyzedproposedorunderconstructionproperties (withinthesurroundingareaandoutside)thatcouldcompetewiththesubject’spotentialmarket rentalrateandoccupancy.Thisfutureinventory(assumingclassA)willlikelycompetewiththe subject.Giventhecurrentuncertaintyinthemarket,thestatusoftheproposedprojectsisunclear. Noneoftheproposedprojectshaveannounceddelaysorcancelations.Werecommendedthatthe statusoftheproposedconstructionprojectsbemonitoredoverthecomingmonths.Themost competitiveprojectsaresummarizedbelow. PrimaryMarketSupply #Property YearBuilt #ofUnits Status Occupancy 1 AddisonPlace 2018 294 Stabilized 97.28% 2SpringsatHammockCove 2019 340 Recentlycompleted 73.82% 3AsteratLely 2015 308 Stabilized 97.08% 4 Inspira 2018 304 Stabilized 96.05% 5 MilanoLakes 2018 296 Stabilized 96.96% 6LegacyNaples 2019 304 Recentlycompleted 89.47% 7OrchidRun 2015 282 Stabilized 98.23% ThecurrentvacancyrateforallclassesofapartmentunitsintheMetroAreais9.82%.Inaddition,the stabilizedcommunitiesshownaboveproduceacurrentvacancyrateof9.30%,withthestabilized propertiesat5.26%.Ourdemandanalysisthatfollowsindicatesacurrentoccupancyrateof138.5% (basedonafundamentaldemandanalysisdiscussedlaterinthereport)decreasingto122.1%as 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 739 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) ExecutiveSummary4 ProposedCreeksideApartmentsSite multiͲfamilydevelopmentcomesonͲlineoverthenext5Ͳyears.Overall,multifamilymarketconditions havebeenstrengtheningoverthepastthreeyearsanddemandisprojectedtoremainstrongoverthe shortterm. Anotherindicationofthestrengthofthecurrentmarketandthedemandofplannedconstructionis absorptionrates.Thetableshownbelowsummarizestheactualabsorptionratesatthecompeting properties.Asshown,thesubjectcouldexpecttoacquiresimilarrates. AbsorptionComparables # Property YearBuilt #ofUnits MonthstoStabilization MonthlyAbsorption 1AddisonPlace 2018 294 15 20 2SpringsatHammockCove 2019 340 Recentlycompleted N/A 3AsteratLely 2015 308 27 11 4 Inspira 2018 304 21 14 5 MilanoLakes 2018 296 24 12 6LegacyNaples 2019 304 Recentlycompleted N/A 7OrchidRun 2015 282 9 31 ExtraordinaryAssumptionsandHypotheticalConditions Ourmarketstudyissubjecttothefollowingextraordinaryassumptionsandhypotheticalconditions. ExtraordinaryAssumptionsandHypotheticalConditions 1. Inadditiontobeingconstructedinaccordancewithallconstructionregulations,itisassumedtheproposed improvementswillbeconstructedwithgoodqualityfinishes,similartothatofcompetingpropertiesor similartothecurrentmarketstandardsofa“ClassA/B”apartmentcomplex. 2. ItisanassumptionthatthesubjectwillberezonedandapprovedfordevelopmentofamidtohighͲrise apartmentdevelopment. 1. None;N/A. Theuseofanyextraordinaryassumptionorhypotheticalconditionmayhaveaffectedtheassignmentresults. Thevalueconclusionsarebasedonthefollowinghypotheticalconditions.Ahypotheticalconditionisa condition,directlyrelatedtoaspecificassignment,whichiscontrarytowhatisknownbytheappraisertoexist ontheeffectivedateoftheassignmentresults,butisusedforthepurposeofanalysis. Thevalueconclusionsaresubjecttothefollowingextraordinaryassumptions.Anextraordinaryassumptionisan assignmentͲspecificassumptionasoftheeffectivedateregardinguncertaininformationusedinananalysis which,iffoundtobefalse,couldaltertheappraiser’sopinionsorconclusions. 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 740 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) GeneralInformation5 ProposedCreeksideApartmentsSite GeneralInformation IdentificationofSubject TheproposedmultifamilyprojectistobelocatedalongtheSECofImmokaleeRdandGoodletteͲ FrankeRdNintheNorthNaplesareaofCollierCounty.Thissubjectsiterepresentsonlyaportionofa largerparenttract.TheparenttractiscurrentlyzonedaspartoftheCreeksideCommercePark CommercialPlannedUnitDevelopment,whichallowsforawidevarietyofcommercialusesinclusive ofmultifamily.Thesubjectsitewillconsistofapproximately10.0acres.MidtohighͲrisecondominium developmentswithstructuredparkinggarageshavehigherdensitiesinͲlinewiththesubject's proposeddevelopmentanddensity.Thesubject'sproposeduseisfor300units. PropertyIdentification PropertyName ProposedCreeksideApartmentsSite Address SECImmokaleeRdandGoodletteFrankRd Naples,Florida34110 TaxID Portionof23991198024,23991198040,29331180609,29333000046, 29331181129,and29331180023 OwnerofRecord CreeksideEast,Inc LegalDescription Seeaddenda CensusTractNumber 102.13  DataResearchandAnalysis Wehaveperformedamarketsupply/demandstudyoftheareaforaproposedmultifamily development.Aspartofthisanalysis,wethoroughlysurveyedapartmentcommunitiesthroughout CollierandLeeCounties.However,weconcentratedonthemostcomparableproperties(assuming markettypicalnewerconstructiondevelopments,ifavailable),thosebeingofconstructionquality, age/condition,andclass. ThesubjectislocatedinNorthNapleswithgoodaccesstodemandcentersandtransportation networks.Whilenotdirectlyspecified,thesubjectwillmostlikelybeconsideredaClassAcommunity uponcompletion.Aswillbelaterdiscussed,apartmentdatafromsourcessuchasREISwaslimitedto allclassesofproductinCollierandLeeCounties.REISdoesnotsubdividethemarketareaorclassof product.Assuchwehaveprovidedageneraloverviewofthemarketarea,followedbyamore detailedanalysisofspecificapartmentdevelopments. Overthelasttwoyears,improvingmarketfundamentalshavecauseddeveloperstorespondto increasingdemandwithnewprojects.AmajorityofthenewdevelopmenthasbeeninCollierCounty withanemphasisontheNaplesareaandinLeeCountywithanemphasisonthesouthFortMyers, Estero,andBonitaarea.AsthesubjectislocatedinNaplesandmostoftherecentdevelopmenthas beeninthesurroundingarea,weconsiderthesubject’sdirectmarketareaasthebothCollierandLee countiesanddirectsurroundingareas.Overall,wehaveidentifiedtenpropertiesthatareconsidered tobecompetitiveinnaturetothesubject.Thedatagatheredfromthosepropertiesisthesupporting 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 741 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) GeneralInformation6 ProposedCreeksideApartmentsSite evidenceoftheproposedsubject’slikelyunitmix,rentalrates,andamenities;aswellasinsightto absorptionandotherkeyeconomicfactors. Eachpropertyconsideredtobecompetitivewasinvestigatedastotheirlocation,amenities,unit features,unitmix,rentalrates,andoccupancies.Athoroughlydetailedanalysisoftheproject’s primarymarketareademographicsisincluded.Aspectsofcharacteristicsofpopulationandhousehold incomeareidentifiedanddiscussed.Themarketstudyconductedincludesthefollowing. SupplyAnalysis xOverviewofMetroArea xDefineMarketArea(Basedonsupply,demand,geographiclimitations,etc.) xAuditexistinginventory xProjectsunderconstruction,aswellas,proposedandplannedprojects. DemandAnalysis xLocationalAttributes xPopulationDemographics xDemandGenerators xForecastofDemand xConclusion Inspection JulianL.H.StokesII,MAI,conductedanonͲsiteinspectionofthepropertyonJuly22,2020.CarltonJ. Lloyd,MAI,haspreviouslyinspectedtheproperty. SignificantAppraisalAssistance ItisacknowledgedthatStevenB.Stokesmadeasignificantprofessionalcontributiontothisappraisal, consistingofparticipatinginthepropertyinspection,conductingresearchonthesubjectand transactionsinvolvingcomparableproperties,performingappraisalanalyses,andassistinginreport writing,underthesupervisionofthepersonssigningthereport. I,JulianL.H.StokesII,MAI,thesupervisoryappraiserofaregisteredappraisertraineewhocontributed tothedevelopmentorcommunicationofthisappraisal,herebyacceptsfullandcomplete responsibilityforanyworkperformedbytheregisteredappraisertraineenamedinthisreportasifit weremyownwork. ExtraordinaryAssumptionsandHypotheticalConditions Ourmarketstudyissubjecttothefollowingextraordinaryassumptionsandhypotheticalconditions. 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 742 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) GeneralInformation7 ProposedCreeksideApartmentsSite ExtraordinaryAssumptionsandHypotheticalConditions 1. Inadditiontobeingconstructedinaccordancewithallconstructionregulations,itisassumedtheproposed improvementswillbeconstructedwithgoodqualityfinishes,similartothatofcompetingpropertiesor similartothecurrentmarketstandardsofa“ClassA/B”apartmentcomplex. 2. ItisanassumptionthatthesubjectwillberezonedandapprovedfordevelopmentofamidtohighͲrise apartmentdevelopment. 1. None;N/A. Theuseofanyextraordinaryassumptionorhypotheticalconditionmayhaveaffectedtheassignmentresults. Thevalueconclusionsarebasedonthefollowinghypotheticalconditions.Ahypotheticalconditionisa condition,directlyrelatedtoaspecificassignment,whichiscontrarytowhatisknownbytheappraisertoexist ontheeffectivedateoftheassignmentresults,butisusedforthepurposeofanalysis. Thevalueconclusionsaresubjecttothefollowingextraordinaryassumptions.Anextraordinaryassumptionisan assignmentͲspecificassumptionasoftheeffectivedateregardinguncertaininformationusedinananalysis which,iffoundtobefalse,couldaltertheappraiser’sopinionsorconclusions.  9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 743 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) CollierCountyAreaAnalysis8 ProposedCreeksideApartmentsSite EconomicAnalysis Thereaderisremindedthatthedemographicspresentedonthisandthefollowingpageswere gatheredduringtheperiodthatprecededtheCOVIDͲ19pandemicandimminentrecession.Thedata providesusefulinformationforpurposesofconsideringthepopulationandeconomyofthelocalarea understabilizedmarketconditions.However,joblosses,unemployment(overallandindifferent sectors),impairedcommerce,andreducedincomelevelswillresultindemographicstatisticsafter February2020thatdonotfollowthestabilizedtrendthatwouldhavebeenexpectedbasedonlyona reviewofdatathrough2019andthefirstfewweeksof2020. CollierCountyAreaAnalysis CollierCountyislocatedinsouthwesternFloridaapproximately166milessouthofTampa.Itis1,998 squaremilesinsizeandhasapopulationdensityof194personspersquaremile.CollierCountyis partoftheNaplesͲImmokaleeͲMarcoIsland,FLMetropolitanStatisticalArea,hereinaftercalledthe NaplesMSA,asdefinedbytheU.S.OfficeofManagementandBudget.  Population CollierCountyhasanestimated2020populationof388,069,whichrepresentsanaverageannual1.9% increaseoverthe2010censusof321,520.CollierCountyaddedanaverageof6,655residentsperyear overthe2010Ͳ2020period,anditsannualgrowthrateexceededtheStateofFloridarateof1.5%. Lookingforward,CollierCounty'spopulationisprojectedtoincreaseata1.5%annualratefrom2020Ͳ 2025,equivalenttotheadditionofanaverageof5,907residentsperyear.CollierCounty'sgrowth rateisexpectedtoexceedthatofFlorida,whichisprojectedtobe1.3%. 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 744 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) CollierCountyAreaAnalysis9 ProposedCreeksideApartmentsSite  Employment TotalemploymentinCollierCountyiscurrentlyestimatedat142,644jobs.BetweenyearͲend2008 andthepresent,employmentroseby17,011jobs,equivalenttoa13.5%increaseovertheentire period.Thereweregainsinemploymentineightoutofthepasttenyearsdespitethenational economicdownturnandslowrecovery.AlthoughCollierCounty'semploymentroseoverthelast decade,itunderperformedFlorida,whichexperiencedanincreaseinemploymentof14.6%or 1,104,776jobsoverthisperiod. Acomparisonofunemploymentratesisanotherwayofgauginganarea’seconomichealth.Overthe pastdecade,theCollierCountyunemploymentratehasbeenslightlyhigherthanthatofFlorida,with anaverageunemploymentrateof7.2%incomparisontoa7.1%rateforFlorida.Ahigher unemploymentrateisanegativeindicator. RecentdatashowsthattheCollierCountyunemploymentrateis2.5%incomparisontoa2.9%rate forFlorida,apositivesignforCollierCountyeconomybutonethatmustbetemperedbythefactthat CollierCountyhasunderperformedFloridaintherateofjobgrowthoverthepasttwoyears.  9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 745 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) CollierCountyAreaAnalysis10 ProposedCreeksideApartmentsSite EmploymentSectors ThecompositionoftheCollierCountyjobmarketisdepictedinthefollowingchart,alongwiththatof Florida.Totalemploymentforbothareasisbrokendownbymajoremploymentsector,andthe sectorsarerankedfromlargesttosmallestbasedonthepercentageofCollierCountyjobsineach category.  CollierCountyhasgreaterconcentrationsthanFloridainthefollowingemploymentsectors: 1.LeisureandHospitality,representing18.2%ofCollierCountypayrollemploymentcomparedto 13.9%forFloridaasawhole.Thissectorincludesemploymentinhotels,restaurants,recreation facilities,andartsandculturalinstitutions. 2.EducationandHealthServices,representing15.2%ofCollierCountypayrollemployment comparedto14.9%forFloridaasawhole.Thissectorincludesemploymentinpublicandprivate schools,colleges,hospitals,andsocialserviceagencies. 3.Construction,representing12.1%ofCollierCountypayrollemploymentcomparedto6.3%for Floridaasawhole.Thissectorincludesconstructionofbuildings,roads,andutilitysystems. EmploymentSectorsͲ2018 18.7% 18.2% 15.2% 12.1% 10.9% 9.7% 5.5% 4.3% 2.9% 1.5% 0.9% 20.3% 13.9% 14.9% 6.3% 15.7% 12.5% 6.6% 3.2% 4.3% 0.7% 1.6% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Trade;Transportation;andUtilities LeisureandHospitality Educationand HealthServices Construction Professionaland BusinessServices Government FinancialActivities OtherServices Manufacturing NaturalResources&Mining Information Collier County Florida Source:BureauofLaborStatisticsandEconomy.com  9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 746 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) CollierCountyAreaAnalysis11 ProposedCreeksideApartmentsSite 4.OtherServices,representing4.3%ofCollierCountypayrollemploymentcomparedto3.2%for Floridaasawhole.Thissectorincludesestablishmentsthatdonotfallwithinotherdefined categories,suchasprivatehouseholds,churches,andlaundryanddrycleaningestablishments. CollierCountyisunderrepresentedinthefollowingsectors: 1.Trade;Transportation;andUtilities,representing18.7%ofCollierCountypayrollemployment comparedto20.3%forFloridaasawhole.Thissectorincludesjobsinretailtrade,wholesale trade,trucking,warehousing,andelectric,gas,andwaterutilities. 2.ProfessionalandBusinessServices,representing10.9%ofCollierCountypayrollemployment comparedto15.7%forFloridaasawhole.Thissectorincludeslegal,accounting,and engineeringfirms,aswellasmanagementofholdingcompanies. 3.Government,representing9.7%ofCollierCountypayrollemploymentcomparedto12.5%for Floridaasawhole.Thissectorincludesemploymentinlocal,state,andfederalgovernment agencies. 4.FinancialActivities,representing5.5%ofCollierCountypayrollemploymentcomparedto6.6% forFloridaasawhole.Banking,insurance,andinvestmentfirmsareincludedinthissector,as arerealestateowners,managers,andbrokers. MajorEmployers MajoremployersinCollierCountyareshowninthefollowingtable.    9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 747 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) CollierCountyAreaAnalysis12 ProposedCreeksideApartmentsSite GrossDomesticProduct GrossDomesticProduct(GDP)isameasureofeconomicactivitybasedonthetotalvalueofgoodsand servicesproducedinadefinedgeographicarea.AlthoughGDPfiguresarenotavailableatthecounty level,datareportedfortheNaplesMSAisconsideredmeaningfulwhencomparedtothenation overall,asCollierCountyispartoftheMSAandsubjecttoitsinfluence. Economicgrowth,asmeasuredbyannualchangesinGDP,hasbeenconsiderablyhigherintheNaples MSAthantheUnitedStatesoverallduringthepasteightyears.TheNaplesMSAhasgrownata2.9% averageannualratewhiletheUnitedStateshasgrownata2.1%rate.Asthenationaleconomy improves,theNaplesMSAhasrecentlyunderperformedtheUnitedStates.GDPfortheNaplesMSA roseby1.2%in2017whiletheUnitedStatesGDProseby2.2%. TheNaplesMSAhasapercapitaGDPof$41,859,whichis25%lessthantheUnitedStatesGDPof $55,418.ThismeansthatNaplesMSAindustriesandemployersareaddingrelativelylessvaluetothe economythantheircounterpartsintheUnitedStatesoverall.   9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 748 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) CollierCountyAreaAnalysis13 ProposedCreeksideApartmentsSite HouseholdIncome CollierCountyismoreaffluentthanFlorida.MedianhouseholdincomeforCollierCountyis$72,649, whichis26.1%greaterthanthecorrespondingfigureforFlorida.  Thefollowingchartshowsthedistributionofhouseholdsacrosstwelveincomelevels.CollierCounty hasagreaterconcentrationofhouseholdsinthehigherincomelevelsthanFlorida.Specifically,49%of CollierCountyhouseholdsareatthe$75,000orgreaterlevelsinhouseholdincomeascomparedto 38%ofFloridahouseholds.Alesserconcentrationofhouseholdsisapparentinthelowerincome levels,as21%ofCollierCountyhouseholdsarebelowthe$35,000levelinhouseholdincomeversus 30%ofFloridahouseholds.  HouseholdIncomeDistributionͲ2020 10.5% 9.6% 9.7% 14.1% 17.9% 12.1% 8.5% 5.5% 5.3% 2.6% 2.8% 1.4% 6.6% 6.9% 7.9% 12.3% 17.8% 13.0% 9.4% 6.2% 6.7% 3.7% 5.3% 4.3% 0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% Lessthan$15,000 $15,000Ͳ$24,999 $25,000Ͳ$34,999 $35,000Ͳ$49,999 $50,000Ͳ$74,999 $75,000Ͳ$99,999 $100,000 Ͳ$124,999 $125,000 Ͳ$149,999 $150,000 Ͳ$199,999 $200,000 Ͳ$249,999 $250,000 Ͳ499,999 $500,000 andmore CollierCounty,FL Florida Source:EnvironicsAnalytics 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 749 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) CollierCountyAreaAnalysis14 ProposedCreeksideApartmentsSite EducationandAge ResidentsofCollierCountyhaveahigherlevelofeducationalattainmentthanthoseofFlorida.An estimated36%ofCollierCountyresidentsarecollegegraduateswithfourͲyeardegrees,versus29%of Floridaresidents.PeopleinCollierCountyareolderthantheirFloridacounterparts.Themedianage forCollierCountyis51years,whilethemedianageforFloridais43years.  Conclusion TheCollierCountyeconomywillbenefitfromagrowingpopulationbaseandhigherincomeand educationlevels.CollierCountyexperiencedgrowthinthenumberofjobsoverthepastdecade,andit isreasonabletoassumethatemploymentgrowthwilloccurinthefuture.Moreover,CollierCounty benefitsfrombeingpartoftheNaplesMSA,whichhasexhibitedahigherrateofGDPgrowththanthe nationoverall.WeanticipatethattheCollierCountyeconomywillimproveandemploymentwill grow,strengtheningthedemandforrealestate. Aspreviouslyreferenced,COVIDͲ19haspushedtheeconomyatalllevelsintoarecessionwhichhas yettobestatisticallyprovenordefinitivelyquantified.Therefore,thestatisticalsummaryoftheregion providedabovemustbeconsideredinlightofthefactthateconomicindicatorsavailableinthenear futurewillshowasubstantialcontractionofeconomicactivitybeginninginthefirstquarterof2020. ThisissueisdiscussedmorefullyaftertheMarketAnalysissectionofthisreport. 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 750 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) CollierCountyAreaAnalysis15 ProposedCreeksideApartmentsSite AreaMap  9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 751 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) SurroundingAreaAnalysis16 ProposedCreeksideApartmentsSite SurroundingAreaAnalysis Boundaries ThesubjectislocatedatthesoutheastcornerofImmokaleeRoadandGoodletteFrankRoadin Naples.ThisareaispartoftheNorthNaplessubmarketofCollierCountyandgenerallyisdelineatedas follows: NorthLeeCounty SouthGoldenGateParkway EastCollierBoulevard WestGulfofMexico  Amapidentifyingthelocationofthepropertyfollowsthissection. AccessandLinkages PrimaryaccesstotheareaisprovidedbyImmokaleeRoadamajorarterialthatcrossestheNorth Naplesareainaneast/westdirection.ImmokaleeRoadisthemostnortherneast/westthoroughfare inCollierCounty.ImmokaleeRoadcanbeaccessedfromavarietyofnorth/souththoroughfaressuch asIͲ75,AirportRoad,TamiamiTrail,andLivingstonRoad.TamiamiTrailisamajornorth/south arterialthatprovidesaccesstoFortMyers,northofthesubjectpropertyandtoDowntownNaples, southofthesubjectproperty.AirportRoadisanothermajorarterialintheNaplesareathatrunsfrom ImmokaleeRoadsouthtoTamiamiTrailEast.Overall,vehicularaccessisgood. Interstate75ispartoftheUSinterstatesystemthattraversestheWestCoastofFlorida.Thishighway systemextendsfromsouthFloridawhereitconnectswithAlligatorAlleyjusteastofNaplesand continueseasttotheFortLauderdalearea.ThissystemextendsnorththroughthestatesofFlorida andGeorgiaintothemidͲwestandrustbeltareaofthenation.Thissystemisamajorcommercialand touristtrafficcarriertothestateofFlorida.AccesstoInterstate75canbeutilizedthroughtheuseof ImmokaleeRoad,whichisExit111thatislocatedeastofthesubjectproperty.Overallvehicular accessisgood. PublictransportationisprovidedbyCollierAreaTransitandprovidesaccessthroughoutCollier County.Thelocalmarketperceivespublictransportationasaveragecomparedtootherareasinthe region.However,theprimarymodeoftransportationinthisareaistheautomobile. TheSouthwestFloridaInternationalAirportislocatedabout25milesfromtheproperty;traveltimeis about30minutes,dependingontrafficconditions.TheNaplesCBD,theeconomicandculturalcenter oftheregion,isapproximately11milesfromtheproperty.ItshouldbenotedthatNapleshas numerouseconomiccenters. 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 752 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) SurroundingAreaAnalysis17 ProposedCreeksideApartmentsSite DemandGenerators MajoremployersinCollierCountyincludetheNCHHealthcareSystem,CollierCountyPublicSchools, PublixSupermarketsandArthrex.TheseareinnumerouslocationsthroughoutCollierCounty.The biggestdemandgeneratorsforthesurroundingareawouldincludetheresidentialdevelopmentsthat surroundthesubjectproperty.TheseincludethePalmRiverEstates,NaplesPark,Stonebridge CountryClub,ColliersReserve,WilloughbyAcres,andothers.PalmRiverEstates,locatedjustnorthof thesubject,isacommunitybuiltaroundoneoftheoldestSouthwestFloridagolfcourses,theLaPlaya GolfCourseandCountryClub(formerlythePalmRiverCountryClub).NaplesParkiswestofthe subjectandconsistsoftheareasouthofImmokaleeRoad,northofVanderbiltBeachRoadbetween TamiamiTrailandVanderbiltDrive.TheareaislargelycomprisedofsingleͲfamilydevelopment. StonebridgeCountryClubislocatedjusteastofthesubjectandoffersdifferentresidential communitiesbuiltaroundan18Ͳholegolfcourseandcountryclub. Thesubjectpropertyisalsonearnumerousretaildevelopments.ThisincludestheGranadaShoppes, whichisa300,000ͲsquarefootcommunityshoppingcenterservicingtheNaplesandBonitaSprings markets.Marshalls,HobbyLobbyandTraderJoesanchorthedevelopment.Therearealsonumerous outparcelsdevelopmentwithnationalretailersandrestaurantchains.DirectlynorthofGranada ShoppesistheRiverchasePlazaatthenortheastcornerofTamiamiTrailandImmokaleeRoad.Publix anchorsthisplaza.DirectlyacrossTamiamiTrailfromtheRiverchasePlazaisaWalͲMartSupercenter. ThepropertyisalsonearMercato.MercatoislargemixedͲusedevelopmentanchoredbyWhole Foods.ThisupscalemixedͲusedevelopmentislocatedatthenortheastcornerofTamiamiTrailand VanderbiltBeachRoad,southofthesubject.NCH’sNorthNaplesHospitalcampusislocatedonthe northeastcornerofHealthParkBoulevardandImmokaleeRoad,nearthesubject.ItispartoftheNCH HealthCareSystemwhichcontainsmorethan500independentphysiciansandmedicalfacilitiesin dozensoflocationsthroughoutCollierCountyandSouthwestFlorida.Thiscampuscontains approximately295bedsandprovidesarangeofservicesincluding,butnotlimitedto obstetrics/gynecology,aLevelIIneonatalnursery,orthopedics,diagnosticcardiaccatheterization, generalsurgery,emergencymedicine,progressivecare,intensivecare,pediatricsandpediatric progressivecare. Arthrexisaglobalmedicaldevicecompanyandleaderinnewproductdevelopmentandmedical educationinorthopedics.Withacorporatemissionofhelpingsurgeonstreattheirpatientsbetter, Arthrexhaspioneeredthefieldofarthroscopyanddevelopedmorethan10,000innovativeproducts andsurgicalprocedurestoadvanceminimallyinvasiveorthopedicsworldwide.Arthrexiscontinuingto expanditscorporateheadquartersinNorthNapleswithintheCreeksideCommercePark,a107Ͳacre businessparkdevelopedbyNaplesͲbasedBarronCollierCos.A308,800squarefootexpansionis currentlyunderconstruction(orclosetocompletion)aspartofalargerexpansionthatalsowill includea160Ͳroomhotel.Arthrexoccupies900,000squarefeetofofficespaceintheNaplesmarket whichisthemostintheprivateͲsectorofofficespace.Since2011,thecompanyhasaddedmorethan 1,000newemployeesbringingitstotaltoaround3,000.By2021,Arthrexplanstoaddanother560 workerstoitsSouthwestFloridapayroll. Thesedemandgeneratorssupportthedemographicprofiledescribedinthefollowingsection. 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 753 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) SurroundingAreaAnalysis18 ProposedCreeksideApartmentsSite Demographics Ademographicprofileofthesurroundingarea,includingpopulation,households,andincomedata,is presentedinthefollowingtable.  Asshownabove,thecurrentpopulationwithina3Ͳmileradiusofthesubjectis56,209,andthe averagehouseholdsizeis2.1.Populationintheareahasgrownsincethe2010census,andthistrend isprojectedtocontinueoverthenextfiveyears.ComparedtoCollierCountyoverall,thepopulation withina3Ͳmileradiusisprojectedtogrowatafasterrate. Medianhouseholdincomeis$85,454,whichishigherthanthehouseholdincomeforCollierCounty. Residentswithina3Ͳmileradiushaveaconsiderablyhigherlevelofeducationalattainmentthanthose ofCollierCounty,whilemedianowneroccupiedhomevaluesareconsiderablyhigher. Thesedemographicfactorscombinedwiththeemploymentbasediscussedpreviouslyprovidethe basisofdemandformultifamilyhousinginthisarea. RetailandPublicServices ThenearestshoppingfacilitiesservingtheareaarelocatedatthecornerofImmokaleeRoadand TamiamiTrail,lessthanonemilewestfromtheproperty.Theyofferbasicconveniencegoodsand personalservices.TheclosestregionalmallisCoastlandCenter,locatedaboutsevenmilesfromthe property.Mercato,alsooffersshops,restaurants,andentertainmentwhichislocatedatVanderbilt andUSͲ41,southwestofthesubjectsite.Restaurants,principallyalongmajorarterialssuchas ImmokaleeRoad,TamiamiTrail,GoodletteͲFrankRoad,andAirportRoad,arewithina15Ͳminute 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 754 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) SurroundingAreaAnalysis19 ProposedCreeksideApartmentsSite traveltimeoftheproperty.Theclosestlodgingfacilitiesarelocatedwithina15Ͳminutedriveofthe subjectandincludemostmajorflags. Thenearestfireandpolicestationsarewithinoneandthreemilesoftheproperty,respectively.The closestelementary/middleschooliswithinoneandfivemilesandthelocalhighschoolisjustoverfive milesaway.TheclosestcollegesanduniversitiesareFloridaGulfCoastUniversityandSouthwest FloridaStateCollege. Proximitytoparks,openspaceandotherpassiverecreationisaverage.Ofspecialnoteistheproximity ofBarefootBeachCountyPreserve,DelnorͲWigginsPassStatePark,andVanderbiltBeach. LandUse Landusesimmediatelysurroundingthesubjectarepredominantlycommercialandresidential.Retail developmentisprimarilylocatedalongmajorroadwayssuchasImmokaleeRoad,TamiamiTrail, AirportRoad,andVanderbiltBeachRoad.Inadditiontothecommercialuses,thereareseveral residentialdevelopmentsintheareaaspreviouslynoted.Otherlandusecharacteristicsare summarizedasfollows: SurroundingAreaLandUses CharacterofAreaSuburban PredominantHousingAge (BothOwnershipandRental) 20+years PredominantQualityandConditionAverage ApproximatePercentDeveloped90% Infrastructure/PlanningAverage ProspectiveChangeinLandUseNotlikely PrevailingDirectionofGrowthEast  Subject’sImmediateSurroundings NorthCreeksideCorners/NaplesCommunityHospital SouthNaplesCommunityHospital EastBayshoreMemoryCareandvacantcommercialland WestCreeksideMedicalCenter   9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 755 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) SurroundingAreaAnalysis20 ProposedCreeksideApartmentsSite DevelopmentActivityandTrends Propertiesrecentlycompleted,currentlyunderconstruction,orproposedforconstructionwithina oneͲmileradiusofthesubjectpropertyaresummarizedbelow. xA5,468Ͳsquarefootmedicalofficewasconstructedat875109thAvein2019. xA53,650ͲsquarefootautodealershipisunderconstructionalongTamiamiTrailNorth. PropertywillbehometoFerrariofNaples.Deliveryisscheduledfortheendof2020. xTheArthrexEventandAdministrationBuildingwasrecentlyconstructedFebruary2020and adds300,000squarefeetontheNaplescampuslocatedattheSECofGoodletteRoadand ImmokaleeRoad. xA5,000ͲsquarefootofficebuildingwasrecentlyconstructedinJanuary2020at1284 InnovationDr. xTheInnovationHotelwascompletedJanuary2020at1290InnovationSt.  9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 756 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) SurroundingAreaAnalysis21 ProposedCreeksideApartmentsSite OutlookandConclusions Overthelastcoupleofyears,theNorthNaplesmarkethasbeeninthestageoftherealestatecycle bestdescribedas“expansion”.Expansionfollowstherecoveryperiodoftherealestatemarketcycle andisbestcharacterizedasaperiodwherethereissustainedgrowthindemandandincreased construction.Weexpectgrowthintheareatocontinueduetotheinfluenceofmajoremployersand demandgeneratorsinthesubmarket. Incomparisontootherareasintheregion,theareaisratedasfollows: SurroundingAreaAttributeRatings HighwayAccessAverage DemandGeneratorsAboveAverage ConveniencetoSupportServicesAverage ConveniencetoPublicTransportationAverage EmploymentStabilityAverage PoliceandFireProtectionAverage PropertyCompatibilityAverage GeneralAppearanceofPropertiesAverage AppealtoMarketAverage BarrierstoCompetitiveEntryAverage Price/ValueTrendAverage  9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 757 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) SurroundingAreaAnalysis22 ProposedCreeksideApartmentsSite SurroundingAreaMap  9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 758 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) LandDescriptionandAnalysis23 ProposedCreeksideApartmentsSite PropertyAnalysis LandDescriptionandAnalysis Location ThepropertyislocatedatthesoutheastcornerofImmokaleeRoadandGoodletteͲFrankRoad. LandArea Thefollowingtablesummarizesthesubject’slandarea. LandAreaSummary TaxID Address SF Acres Portionof 23991198024, 23991198040, 1267CreeksideBlvdE00.00 29331180609, NoSiteAddress 435,426 10.00 29333000046, NoSiteAddress 0 0.00 29331181129,&NoSiteAddress 0 0.00 29331180023 NoSiteAddress 0 0.00 Total 435,426 10.00 Source:PublicRecords  ShapeandDimensions Thesiteisirregularinshape,withdimensionsthatvaryinwidthandindepth.Siteutilitybasedon shapeanddimensionsisaverage. Topography Thesiteisgenerallylevelandatstreetgrade.Thetopographydoesnotresultinanyparticular developmentlimitations. Drainage Noparticulardrainageproblemswereobservedordisclosedatthetimeoffieldinspection.This appraisalassumesthatsurfacewatercollection,bothonͲsiteandinpublicstreetsadjacenttothe subject,isadequate.  9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 759 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) LandDescriptionandAnalysis24 ProposedCreeksideApartmentsSite FloodHazardStatus Thefollowingtableprovidesfloodhazardinformation. FloodHazardStatus CommunityPanelNumber 12021C0193H Date May16,2012 Zone X Description Outsideof500Ͳyearfloodplain InsuranceRequired? No  EnvironmentalHazards Anenvironmentalassessmentreportwasnotprovidedforreview,andduringourinspection,wedid notobserveanyobvioussignsofcontaminationonornearthesubject.However,environmental issuesarebeyondourscopeofexpertise.Itisassumedthatthepropertyisnotadverselyaffectedby environmentalhazards. GroundStability AsoilsreportwaspreparedforthesubjectbyGFAInternational,datedNovember20,2014.The followingwastakenfromtheExecutiveSummarysectionofthereport. “Thepurposeofoursubsurfaceexplorationwastoclassifythenatureofthesubsurfacesoilsand generalgeomorphicconditionsandevaluatetheirimpactupontheproposedconstruction…Basedon ourestimateofthestructuralloadingdesignrequirementsforthisstructure,GFArecommends performingvibroͲreplacementgroundimprovementatthissitetorenderthesubsurfaceconditions favorableforthesupportoftheproposedstructureonshallowfoundations….” Streets,AccessandFrontage Detailspertainingtostreetaccessandfrontageareprovidedinthefollowingtable. Streets,AccessandFrontage Street ImmokaleeRd GoodletteFrankRd CreeksideBlvdE FrontageFeet Varies Varies Varies Paving Asphalt Asphalt Asphalt Curbs Yes Yes Yes Sidewalks Yes Yes Yes Lanes 2way,3laneseachway 2way,1laneeachway 2way,1laneeachway DirectionofTraffic East/West North/South East/West Condition Average Average Average TrafficLevels High Moderate Low Signals/TrafficControl Trafficlight Turnlane None Access/CurbCuts Yes Yes Yes Visibility Average Average Average  9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 760 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) LandDescriptionandAnalysis25 ProposedCreeksideApartmentsSite Utilities Theavailabilityofutilitiestothesubjectissummarizedinthefollowingtable. Utilities Service Provider Water Municipalservices Sewer Municipalservices Electricity FP&L LocalPhone Multiplecarriers  Zoning ThesubjectiszonedCPUD,CreeksideCommerceParkCommercialPlannedUnitDevelopment,by CollierCounty.Thefollowingtablesummarizesourunderstandingandinterpretationofthezoning requirementsthataffectthesubject. ZoningSummary ZoningJurisdiction CollierCounty ZoningDesignation CPUD Description CreeksideCommerceParkCommercialPlannedUnitDevelopment LegallyConforming? Appearstobelegallyconforming ZoningChangeLikely? No PermittedUses CreeksideCommerceParkwillconsistofpredominatelyindustrial, warehouse,wholesale,financialinstitutions,businessandofficeuses, withlimitedamountsofretailuses.CreeksideCommerceParkshall establishprojectͲwideguidelinesandstandardstoensureahighand consistentlevelofqualityforproposedfeaturesandfacilities Category ZoningRequirement MinimumLotArea 20,000squarefeet MinimumLotWidth(Feet) 100 MinimumSetbacks(Feet) ImmokaleeorGoodletteͲFrankRdͲFrontͲ50;FrontInternalͲ30;Side5 to10;WaterfrontͲ0to20;RearͲ25;PerimeterBoundaryͲ50 MaximumBuildingHeight 35to50feet Source:Ordinance2006Ͳ50  ItisanassumptionthatthesubjectwillberezonedandapprovedfordevelopmentofamidtohighͲ riseapartmentdevelopment. Wearenotexpertsintheinterpretationofzoningordinances.Anappropriatelyqualifiedlanduse attorneyshouldbeengagedifadeterminationofcomplianceisrequired. 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 761 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) LandDescriptionandAnalysis26 ProposedCreeksideApartmentsSite OtherLandUseRegulations Wearenotawareofanyotherlanduseregulationsthatwouldaffecttheproperty. RentControlRegulations Thesubjectisnotaffectedbyanytypeofregulationthatwouldrestricttheamountofrentthatthe ownercanchargetotenants. Easements,EncroachmentsandRestrictions Wewerenotprovidedacurrenttitlereporttoreview.Wearenotawareofanyeasements, encroachments,orrestrictionsthatwouldadverselyaffectvalue.Ourvaluationassumesnoadverse impactsfromeasements,encroachments,orrestrictions,andfurtherassumesthatthesubjecthas clearandmarketabletitle. ConclusionofSiteAnalysis Overall,thephysicalcharacteristicsofthesiteandtheavailabilityofutilitiesresultinfunctionalutility suitableforavarietyofusesincludingthosepermittedbyzoning.Usespermittedbycreekside CommerceParkwillconsistofpredominatelyindustrial,warehouse,wholesale,financialinstitutions, businessandofficeuses,withlimitedamountsofretailuses.CreeksideCommerceParkshallestablish projectͲwideguidelinesandstandardstoensureahighandconsistentlevelofqualityforproposed featuresandfacilities.Itisanassumptionthatthesubjectwillberezonedandapprovedfor developmentofamidtohighͲriseapartmentdevelopment. 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 762 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) LandDescriptionandAnalysis27 ProposedCreeksideApartmentsSite AerialMap  9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 763 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) LandDescriptionandAnalysis28 ProposedCreeksideApartmentsSite FloodMap  9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 764 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) LandDescriptionandAnalysis29 ProposedCreeksideApartmentsSite SketchofDescription  9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 765 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) LandDescriptionandAnalysis30 ProposedCreeksideApartmentsSite ZoningMap  9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 766 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) 31 ProposedCreeksideApartmentsSite MultifamilyMarketAnalysis Asreferencedpreviously,thedatapresentedinthefollowingsectionisbasedonhistoricalreporting andpreͲCOVIDͲ19.Attheconclusionofthissection,marketfactorsimpactingcurrenteconomic trendswillbeanalyzedandtowhatextenttheymayimpactpropertyvaluationassumptions. MetroAreaOverview ThesubjectislocatedintheNaplesͲFLmetroareaasdefinedbyCoStar.Trendedsupplyanddemand statistics,includinginventorylevels,absorption,vacancy,andrentalratesforallclassesofspaceare presentedintheensuingtable.  9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 767 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) 32 ProposedCreeksideApartmentsSite NaplesͲFLMetroTrendsandForecasts  xThecurrentvacancyrateinthemetroareais9.82%;thevacancyratehasdecreasedby50bps from2018Q3. xTwoͲyearBaseCaseforecastsprojecta11.12%vacancyrateinthemetroarea,representing anincreaseof131bpsby2022Q3. xAskingrentaverages$1,358/unitinthemetroarea,andvalueshavedecreasedby5.83%from 2018Q3. xTwoͲyearBaseCaseforecastsprojecta$1,359/unitaskingrentinthemetroarea, representinganincreaseof0.08%by2022Q3. Source:CoStar,Inc.;compiledbyIntegra RealtyResources,Inc. 0.0% 2.0% 4.0% 6.0% 8.0% 10.0% 12.0% 14.0% 16.0% 18.0% $0.0 $200.0 $400.0 $600.0 $800.0 $1,000.0 $1,200.0 $1,400.0 $1,600.0 2007 Q3 2008 Q3 2009 Q3 2010 Q3 2011 Q3 2012 Q3 2013 Q3 2014 Q3 2015 Q3 2016 Q3 2017 Q3 2018 Q3 2019 Q3 2020 Q3 2021 Q3 2022 Q3 2023 Q3 2024 Q3 2025 Q3 Vacancy Ratevs.AskingRent AskingRent($/Unit)VacancyRate(%) 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 768 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) 33 ProposedCreeksideApartmentsSite  xThetotalstock(units)hasincreasedby13.93%from2018Q3,whilethedemandhas increasedby14.57%. xBetween2015Q4and2020Q3,netcompletionsinthemetroareahaveaveraged426units annually,andreachedapeakof634unitsin2019Q2. xBetween2015Q4and2020Q3,netabsorptioninthemetroareahasaveraged285units annually,andreachedapeakof349unitsin2020Q3.  Source:CoStar,Inc.;compiledbyIntegraRealtyResources,Inc. 0.0% 2.0% 4.0% 6.0% 8.0% 10.0% 12.0% 14.0% 16.0% 18.0% Ͳ200 Ͳ100 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 SupplyandDemandTrends Completions(Units)Absorption(Units)VacancyRate(%) 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 769 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) 34 ProposedCreeksideApartmentsSite SubmarketOverview ThesubjectislocatedintheNorthNaplessubmarketasdefinedbyCoStar.Trendedsupplyand demandstatistics,includinginventorylevels,absorption,vacancy,andrentalratesforallclassesof spacearepresentedinthefollowingtable.  xTheNorthNaplessubmarketcomprises29.2%ofthemetrobuildingstockand29.5%ofthe metrobuildingdemand. xThevacancyrateintheNorthNaplessubmarketis8.69%,whichislessthanthemetroarea's averageof9.82%. xNorthNaplesmarketrateis$1,352/unitwhichislessthanthemetroarea'saveragerateof $1,358/unit. 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 770 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) 35 ProposedCreeksideApartmentsSite NorthNaplesSubmarketTrendsandForecasts  xThecurrentvacancyrateinthesubmarketareais8.69%;thevacancyratehasincreasedby 344bpsfrom2018Q3. xTwoͲyearBaseCaseforecastsprojecta11.32%vacancyrateinthesubmarketarea, representinganincreaseof263bpsby2022Q3. xAskingrentaverages$1,352/unitinthesubmarketarea,andvalueshavedecreasedby10.68% from2018Q3. xTwoͲyearBaseCaseforecastsprojecta$1,352/unitaskingrentinthesubmarketarea, representingadecreaseof0.04%by2022Q3. Source:CoStar,Inc.;compiledbyIntegraRealtyResources,Inc. 0.0% 2.0% 4.0% 6.0% 8.0% 10.0% 12.0% 14.0% 16.0% 18.0% $0.00 $200.00 $400.00 $600.00 $800.00 $1,000.00 $1,200.00 $1,400.00 $1,600.00 2007 Q3 2008 Q3 2009 Q3 2010 Q3 2011 Q3 2012 Q3 2013 Q3 2014 Q3 2015 Q3 2016 Q3 2017 Q3 2018 Q3 2019 Q3 2020 Q3 2021 Q3 2022 Q3 2023 Q3 2024 Q3 2025 Q3 Vacancy Ratevs.AskingRent AskingRent ($/Unit)VacancyRate(%) 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 771 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) 36 ProposedCreeksideApartmentsSite  xThetotalstock(units)hasincreasedby10.96%from2018Q3,whilethedemandhas increasedby6.94%. xBetween2015Q4and2020Q3,netcompletionsinthesubmarketareahaveaveraged59 unitsannually,andreachedapeakof294unitsin2018Q4. xBetween2015Q4and2020Q3,netabsorptioninthesubmarketareahasaveraged31units annually,andreachedapeakof82unitsin2019Q4. Source:CoStar,Inc.;compiledbyIntegraRealtyResources,Inc. 0.0% 2.0% 4.0% 6.0% 8.0% 10.0% 12.0% 14.0% Ͳ150 Ͳ100 Ͳ50 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 SupplyandDemandTrends Completions(Units)Absorption(Units)VacancyRate (%) 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 772 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) 37 ProposedCreeksideApartmentsSite MultifamilyMarketForecastComparisons   Source:CoStar,Inc.;compiledbyIntegraRealtyResources,Inc. 13.2% 11.1% 8.9%8.2%7.7% 15.8% 11.3% 8.5%7.8%7.1% 0.0% 2.0% 4.0% 6.0% 8.0% 10.0% 12.0% 14.0% 16.0% 18.0% 2021Q3 2022Q3 2023Q3 2024Q3 2025Q3 Vacancy RateForecasts VacancyRate(%)ͲMetro VacancyRate(%)ͲSubmarket Source:CoStar,Inc.;compiledbyIntegraRealtyResources,Inc. Ͳ2.7% 2.9% 2.0% 0.9%0.6% Ͳ2.8% 2.8% 2.0% 0.9%0.6% Ͳ4.00% Ͳ3.00% Ͳ2.00% Ͳ1.00% 0.00% 1.00% 2.00% 3.00% 4.00% 2021Q3 2022Q3 2023Q3 2024Q3 2025Q3 RentGrowthForecasts RentGrowth (%)ͲMetro RentGrowth (%)ͲSubmarket 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 773 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) 38 ProposedCreeksideApartmentsSite  MultifamilyMarketOutlookandConclusions Basedonthekeymetroandsubmarketareatrends,constructionoutlook,andtheperformanceof competingpropertiespriortoMarch2020,IRRexpectedthemixofpropertyfundamentalsand economicconditionsintheSouthwestFloridametroareatohaveapositiveimpactonthesubject property’sperformanceinthenearͲterm. Withthatsaid,theoutlookandanyconclusionsmustconsidercurrentandlikelyfuturemarket conditionsduetoCOVIDͲ19.Thefollowingsectionaddresseshowthemarket,andeconomicvalues, arebeingimpactedbythisemergingpandemic.Theconclusionprovidesaframeworkforhowthe valuationaddressesthisemergingissue. PrimaryCompetition DelineationofPrimaryMarketArea Asindicatedinthepreviousanalysis,thegeneralmetroareaisdelineatedastheboundarylimitsof CollierandLeeCounties.However,thesubject’sdirectmarketareaismuchsmallerasthesubject’s directcompetitionisgenerallylocatedwithina5to10ͲmileradiusofNaples. Improvingmarketfundamentalshavecauseddeveloperstorespondtoincreasingdemandwithnew projects.Basedonouranalysisofthecurrentmarket,themajorityofthenewresidential developmentisoccurringwithinorsurroundingtheCollierCountyandLeeCountymarketareas.We areawareofotherresidentialmultifamilydevelopmentsplannedorunderconstructionwithinthe metroarea;however,thesearenotconsidereddirectcompetitionasthesegenerallyconsistsof superiorcondominiumpropertieslocatedinorneartheCBDofNaplesandFortMyers.Typicalnew, underconstruction,and/orproposeddevelopmentofapartmentcomplexesincludegardenͲstyle Source:CoStar,Inc.;compiledbyIntegraRealtyResources,Inc. 5.4% 5.1% 5.1%5.1%5.1% 5.5% 5.2% 5.2%5.1% 5.1% 4.8% 4.9% 5.0% 5.1% 5.2% 5.3% 5.4% 5.5% 5.6% 2021Q3 2022Q3 2023Q3 2024Q3 2025Q3 CapRateForecasts CapRate(%)ͲMetro CapRate(%)ͲSubmarket 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 774 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) 39 ProposedCreeksideApartmentsSite apartmentswithmultiple2to4Ͳstorybuildingsandaseparateclubhousebuildingwithamenities.This comparestothesubject’sproposeddevelopmentofasinglemidrisebuilding. Aswehaveidentifiedthesubject’sdirectcompetitionandprojectedcompetitorsthatareunder constructionorplanned,wehaveidentifiedthesubject’scompetitivemarketareaasthe15Ͳmile radiussurroundingthesubjectlocation.AccordingtoCostar,thereareatotalof5,723multifamily unitswithina15Ͳmileradiusofthesubjectlocation;pleasenotethisconsistofpropertiesrangingin sizeof28unitsormore,andhavingayearbuiltthatrangesbetween2000tonewerconstruction. Pleasenotethatthereareabout2,295unitsofcompetitorsthatareunderconstructionand2,059 proposedthatweareawareofwithinthe15Ͳmileradius.Pleasenotethatmostoftheseprojects underconstructionarelocatedinSouthFortMyers,BonitaSprings,andEstero.Thereisonlyone project(MagnoliaSquare)thatisunderconstructioninthesubject’ssubmarket(NorthNaples).Given thecurrentuncertaintyinthemarket,thestatusoftheproposedprojectsisunclear.Noneofthe proposedprojectshaveannounceddelaysorcancelations.Werecommendedthatthestatusofthe proposedconstructionprojectsbemonitoredoverthecomingmonths.  9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 775 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) 40 ProposedCreeksideApartmentsSite   9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 776 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) 41 ProposedCreeksideApartmentsSite   9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 777 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) 42 ProposedCreeksideApartmentsSite PeerGroupAnalysis Asdiscussed,thesubject’spotentialcompetitionisscatteredthroughouttheNaples,BonitaSprings, andEsteromarkets.However,notallthesepropertiesareconsidereddirectcompetition.Wehave furtherrefinedthesepropertiesandselectedthosethatwouldbeconsidereddirectcompetitionwith thesubject.ItisimportanttonotethatthereisnocompetitiveclassAapartmentwithina3Ͳmile radius.Thesepropertiesconsistofgoodqualitycomplexesandnewerconstructionlocatedwithinthe closestproximitytothesubject.Arentsurveysummaryofthesepropertiesisshowninthetableon thefollowingpage. SummaryofComparableRentals No. PropertyName; Address YrBuilt; Stories UnitMix #Units; %Occ. Avg. Unit SF Avg. Rent/ Month Avg. Rent/ SF 1AddisonPlace 2018 240 8633AddisonPlaceCir.4 97% Naples 1BR/1BA –758 $1,600 $2.11 1BR/1BA –849 $1,625 $1.91 1BR/1BA –867 $1,592 $1.84 1BR/1BA –860 $1,555 $1.81 2BR/2BA –1,067 $1,815 $1.70 2BR/2BA –1,084 $1,798 $1.66 2BR/2BA –1,107 $1,894 $1.71 2BR/2BA –1,110 $1,770 $1.59 2BR/2BA –1,237 $1,981 $1.60 3BR/2BA –1,397 $2,155 $1.54 TenantͲPaidUtilities: UnitFeatures: ProjectAmenities: Comments: 2SpringsatHammockCove 2019 340 4360PetalDr.2 74% Naples Studio –702 $1,325 $1.89 1BR/1BA –797 $1,365 $1.71 Studio –809 $1,369 $1.69 1BR/1BA –828 $1,422 $1.72 1BR/1BA –907 $1,439 $1.59 2BR/2BA –1,088 $1,663 $1.53 2BR/2BA –1,106 $1,663 $1.50 1BR/1BA –933 $1,683 $1.80 2BR/2BA –1,209 $1,718 $1.42 2BR/2BA –1,202 $1,738 $1.45 2BR/2BA –1,088 $1,864 $1.71 3BR/2BA –1,334 $1,976 $1.48 3BR/2BA –1,430 $2,075 $1.45 2BR/2BA –1,106 $2,056 $1.86 TenantͲPaidUtilities: Comments: Carpets/Drapes/Blinds,Patios/Balcony,WalkͲinClosets,Washer/DryerHookup,Washer/DryerInUnit,AirConditioning,Dishwasher,Disposal, Microwave,StainlessAppliances Clubhouse/Rec.Bldg.,FitnessRoom,Playground,SwimmingPool,BusinessCenter,CarCareArea,Billiards,SmokeFreeCommunity,DogPark, Trash,Cable,Broadband,InͲUnitElectric,Sewer,Water Getuptosixweeksrentfreewhenyoumoveinby7/31/2020.Apartmentfeaturesincludehardwoodflooring,centralAC,kitchenislandwithgranite countertops,stainlesssteelenergyefficientappliances,privatebalconyorpatio,washeranddryerandwalkͲinclosets.Communityamenitiesinclude afitnesscenter,swimmingpool,clubhouse,BBQarea,carcarecenter,gatedentrance,24Ͳhourmaintenance,andonͲsitepetplaygroundandspa. ApplicationandAdministrationFeesarewaivedforanyonewhoappliesandmovesinbyJuly31st.Sixweeksfreeonall1ͲBRandonemonthfreeon all2ͲBRwithamoveinbyJuly31stona12to15Ͳmonthleaseterm.Adminfeeis$199andapplicationfeeis$75.Storageis$45permonth. Communityfeaturesincludeafitnesscenter,aswimmingpool,bar/loungearea,cabanas,aclubhouse,gameroomandabusinesscenter.Apartment amenitiesincludewoodflooring,stainlesssteelappliances,walkͲinclosets,washeranddryersandprivatebalconies/patios. Trash,Cable,Broadband,InͲUnitElectric,Sewer,Water  9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 778 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) 43 ProposedCreeksideApartmentsSite SummaryofComparableRentals No. PropertyName; Address YrBuilt; Stories UnitMix ; %Occ. Avg. Unit SF Avg. Rent/ Month Avg. Rent/ SF 3TheAsterinLelyResort 2014 308 8120AcaciaSt.4 97% Naples 1BR/1BA –821 $1,372 $1.67 1BR/1BA – 888 $1,425 $1.60 2BR/2BA –1,096 $1,547 $1.41 2BR/2BA –1,194 $1,593 $1.33 3BR/2BA – 1,435 $1,763 $1.23 TenantͲPaidUtilities: UnitFeatures: ProjectAmenities: Comments: 4 InspiraNaples 2018 304 7485InspiraCir.4 96% Naples 1BR/1BA –800 $1,457 $1.82 1BR/1BA –808 $1,478 $1.83 1BR/1BA –838 $1,509 $1.80 2BR/2BA –1,112 $1,756 $1.58 3BR/2BA – 1,348 $1,998 $1.48 TenantͲPaidUtilities: UnitFeatures: ProjectAmenities: Comments: Nocurrentrentspecialsareoffered.Applicationfeeis$60perapplicantandadminfeeis$175.Petfeeis$350perpetwitha2Ͳpetmaximumand restrictionsupto100lbs.Petrentis$20permonthperpet.Apartmentfeaturesincludewasheranddryers,stainlesssteelappliances,privatepatios andfullyͲequippedkitchens.Communityamenitiesincludeagatedentrance,garages,afitnesscenter,adogpark,acybercaféandaswimmingpool Trash,Cable,Broadband,InͲUnitElectric,Sewer,Water Freeandreducedrentspecialsavailable.Adminfeeis$200andapplicationfeeis$75.Petfeesare$450forthefirstpet,$150forthesecondpet,and $20permonthpetrent.Twopetand100lb.weightlimit.Detachedgaragesareavailablefor$165/month.Apartmentfeaturesincludewashersand dryers,hardwoodflooring,fullyͲequippedkitchens,walkͲinclosets,stainlesssteelappliancesandbalconies/patios.Communityamenitiesincludea2Ͳ storyclubhouse,aswimmingpool,ayogastudio,pickleballandboccecourts,gatedentranceandafitnessstudio. Carpets/Drapes/Blinds,Patios/Balcony,Washer/DryerInUnit,GraniteCountertops,Dishwasher,Disposal,WalkͲinClosets,VaultedCeilings FitnessRoom,YogaStudio,GatedEntrance,Clubhouse/Rec.Bldg.,SwimmingPool,CarCareCenter,Garages,DogPark,Theatre,WiFi AirConditioning,Dishwasher,Disposal,HardwoodFloors,Patios/Balcony,RangeͲRefrig.,WalkͲinClosets,Washer/DryerInUnit Clubhouse/Rec.Bldg.,CoveredParking,FitnessRoom,GatedEntrance,Storage,SwimmingPool Trash,Cable,Broadband,InͲUnitElectric,Sewer,Water  SummaryofComparableRentals No. PropertyName; Address YrBuilt; Stories UnitMix ; %Occ. Avg. Unit SF Avg. Rent/ Month Avg. Rent/ SF 5MilanoLakes 2018 296 3713MilanoLakesCir.4 97% Naples 1BR/1BA – 808 $1,366 $1.69 2BR/2BA – 1,159 $1,475 $1.27 2BR/2BA –1,240 $1,512 $1.22 3BR/2BA –1,439 $1,813 $1.26 TenantͲPaidUtilities: UnitFeatures: ProjectAmenities: Comments: 6LegacyNaples 2019 304 7525DavisBlvd.4 89% Naples 1BR/1BA –804 $1,504 $1.87 1BR/1BA – 867 $1,554 $1.79 2BR/2BA – 1,195 $1,866 $1.56 2BR/2BA – 1,259 $1,846 $1.47 2BR/2BA – 1,264 $1,886 $1.49 2BR/2BA –1,283 $1,878 $1.46 3BR/2BA –1,486 $1,992 $1.34 TenantͲPaidUtilities: UnitFeatures: ProjectAmenities: Comments: Trash,Cable,Broadband,InͲUnitElectric,Sewer,Water Nocurrentspecialsarebeingoffered.Petfeeis$400perpetwithatwopetmaximum.Petrentisanadditional$20permonth.Storageunitsare availablefor$25/monthandparking(surface)spotsareavailablefor$20/month.Apartmentfeaturesincludewashersanddryers,AC,stainlesssteel appliances,hardwoodflooring,walkͲinclosetsandpatios/balconies.Communityamenitiesincludeatotlot,jacuzzi,sportscourts,twobarkparks, outdoorgrillingarea,swimmingpool,clubhouse,coffeebar,andaresidentcenterwithgamingrooms. Trash,Cable,Broadband,InͲUnitElectric,Sewer,Water Currentspecialofupto1.5monthsfreeona10+monthleasetermwithselectmoveͲindates.Applicationfeeis$75.Petfeesare$250perpetwitha twopetlimit.Petrentisanadditional$20permonthperpet.Garageparkingis$150to$175permonth.Apartmentfeaturesincludewashersand dryers,patios/balconieswithstorage,walkͲinclosets,hardwoodflooring,fullyͲequippedkitchensandstainlesssteelappliances.Communityamenities includeaswimmingpool,playground,arooftopterrace,aclubhouseandrecroom,afitnesscenter,adogpark,aconferenceroom,andagaming Clubhouse/Rec.Bldg.,FitnessRoom,Garage/UnderBuilding,GatedEntrance,Playground,Storage,SwimmingPool,Garages,DogPark,GameRoom CeilingFans,CentralAC,Dishwasher,Disposal,HardwoodFloors,Patios/Balcony,RangeͲRefrig.,StorageinUnit,WalkͲinClosets,Washer/DryerInUnit AirConditioning,CeilingFans,Dishwasher,Disposal,HardwoodFloors,Patios/Balcony,RangeͲRefrig.,WalkͲinClosets,Washer/DryerInUnit FitnessRoom,Playground,Spa/HotTub,Storage,SwimmingPool  9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 779 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) 44 ProposedCreeksideApartmentsSite SummaryofComparableRentals No. PropertyName; Address YrBuilt; Stories UnitMix ; %Occ. Avg. Unit SF Avg. Rent/ Month Avg. Rent/ SF 7OrchidRun 2015/2016 282 10991LostLakeDr.4 98% Naples 1BD/1BA 16 849 $1,508 $1.78 3BD/2BA 24 1,326 $1,926 $1.45 2BD/2BA 8 1,147 $1,655 $1.44 2BD/2BA 16 1,127 $1,650 $1.46 2BD/2BA 16 1,100 $1,650 $1.50 1BD/1BA 16 812 $1,421 $1.75 3BD/2BA 24 1,301 $1,971 $1.51 2BD/2BA 16 1,109 $1,640 $1.48 1BD/1BA 24 813 $1,523 $1.87 1BD/1BA 8 811 $1,486 $1.83 1BD/1BA 40 808 $1,508 $1.87 2BD/2BA 32 1,125 $1,675 $1.49 2BD/2BA 30 1,140 $1,645 $1.44 TenantͲPaidUtilities: UnitFeatures: ProjectAmenities: Comments: Carpets/Drapes/Blinds,Patios/Balcony,WalkͲinClosets,Washer/DryerHookup,Washer/DryerInUnit,Microwave,GraniteCountertops,Stainless Appliances,Dishwasher,Disposal Noconcessionswerecurrentlybeingoffered.Adminfeeis$150andapplicationfeeis$50.Attachedgaragesare$210/monthanddetachedgarages are$180/month.Storageis$110/month.Mandatoryvalettrashfeeis$25/month. Trash,Cable,Broadband,InͲUnitElectric,Sewer,Water SmokeFreeCommunity,FitnessRoom,Spa/HotTub,SwimmingPool,CarCareCenter,GatedEntrance,Billiards,StorageUnits,Garages,WineRoom withLockers   9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 780 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) 45 ProposedCreeksideApartmentsSite ComparableRentalsMap  ComparableInformationandRentalTrends AddisonPlace AddisonPlaceisa240Ͳunitapartmentcomplexlocatedat8633AddisonPlaceCircleinNaples.The propertywascompletedin2018andfeaturesoneͲ,twoͲ,andthreeͲbedroomfloorplansrangingin sizefrom758to1,397squarefeet.Baserentsrangefrom$1,555upto$2,155permonth.Vacancy wasreportedat2.72%.Communityfeaturesincludeafitnesscenter,aswimmingpool,bar/lounge area,cabanas,aclubhouse,gameroom,andbusinesscenter.Apartmentamenitiesincludewood flooring,stainlessͲsteelappliances,walkinclosets,washeranddryersandprivatebalconies/patios. SpringsatHammockCove SpringsatHammockCoveisa340Ͳunitapartmentcomplexlocatedat4360PetalDriveinNaples.The propertywascompletedin2019andfeaturesstudio,oneͲ,twoͲ,andthreeͲbedroomfloorplans ranginginsizefrom702to1,430squarefeet.Baserentsrangefrom$1,325upto$2,075permonth. Vacancywasreportedat26.18%.Apartmentfeaturesincludehardwoodflooring,centralAC,kitchen islandwithgranitecountertops,stainlesssteelenergyefficientappliances,privatebalconyorpatio, washeranddryerandwalkinclosets.Communityamenitiesincludeafitnesscenter,swimmingpool, clubhouse,BBQarea,carcarecenter,gatedentrance,24hourmaintenance,andonsitepet playgroundandspa. AsteratLely AsteratLelyisa308Ͳunitapartmentcomplexlocatedat8120AcaciaStreetinNaples.Theproperty wascompletedin2014andfeaturesoneͲ,twoͲ,andthreeͲbedroomfloorplansranginginsizefrom 821to1,435squarefeet.Baserentsrangefrom$1,372upto$1,763permonth.Vacancywas reportedat2.92%.Apartmentfeaturesincludewasheranddryers,stainlesssteelappliances,private Subject 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 781 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) 46 ProposedCreeksideApartmentsSite patiosandfullyequippedkitchens.Communityamenitiesincludegatedentrance,garages,fitness center,dogpark,cyberͲcafé,swimmingpool,andspa. Inspira Inspiraisa304Ͳunitapartmentcomplexlocatedat7485InspiraCircleinNaples.Thepropertywas completedin2018andfeaturesoneͲ,twoͲ,andthreeͲbedroomfloorplansranginginsizefrom800to 1,348squarefeet.Baserentsrangefrom$1,457upto$1,998permonth.Vacancywasreportedat 3.95%.Apartmentfeaturesincludewashersanddryers,hardwoodflooring,fullyequippedkitchens, walkinclosets,stainlessͲsteelappliancesandbalconies/patios.CommunityamenitiesincludeatwoͲ storyclubhouse,swimmingpool,yogastudio,pickleballandboccecourts,gatedentranceanda fitnessstudio. MilanoLakes MilanoLakesisa296Ͳunitapartmentcomplexlocatedat3713MilanoLakesCircleinNaples.The propertywascompletedin2018andfeaturesoneͲ,twoͲ,andthreeͲbedroomfloorplansrangingin sizefrom808to1,439squarefeet.Baserentsrangefrom$1,366upto$1,813permonth.Vacancy wasreportedat3.04%.Apartmentfeaturesincludewashersanddryers,AC,stainlessͲsteelappliances, hardwoodflooring,walkͲinclosetsandpatios/balconies.Communityamenitiesincludeatotlot, jacuzzi,sportscourts,twobarkparks,outdoorgrillingarea,swimmingpool,clubhouse,coffeebar,and aresidentcenterwithgamingrooms. LegacyNaples LegacyNaplesisa304Ͳunitapartmentcomplexlocatedat7525DavisBoulevardinNaples.The propertywascompletedin2019andfeaturesoneͲ,twoͲ,andthreeͲbedroomfloorplansrangingin sizefrom804to1,486squarefeet.Baserentsrangefrom$1,504upto$1,992permonth.Vacancy wasreportedat10.53%.Apartmentfeaturesincludewashersanddryers,patios/balconieswith storage,walkinclosets,hardwoodflooring,fullyequippedkitchensandstainlessͲsteelappliances. Communityamenitiesincludeaswimmingpool,playground,arooftopterrace,aclubhouseandrec room,afitnesscenter,adogpark,aconferenceroom,andagamingarea. OrchidRun OrchidRunisa282Ͳunitapartmentcomplexlocatedat10991LostLakeDriveinNaples.Theproperty wascompletedin2015andfeaturesoneͲ,twoͲ,andthreeͲbedroomfloorplansranginginsizefrom 808to1,326squarefeet.Baserentsrangefrom$1,486upto$1,971permonth.Vacancywas reportedat1.77%.CommunityamenitiesincludeyogaandPilatesstudio,WiͲFi,storageunits,pool andspawithcabanas,reading/computerroom,pooltables,petwashingstation,outdoorpingpong tables,outdoorbarandgasgrillarea,mediacenter,loungearea,fitnesscenter,hammockareas, coffeebar,gatedentry,demokitchen,climatecontrolledwineroomwithindividuallysecuredlockers, trashcompactor,carwash,attachedanddetachedgarages,andelevators.Apartmentamenities includewalkͲinclosets,upgradedcarpet,tiledshowerswithglassdoors,sideͲbyͲsiderefrigerators, securityalarms,rainshowerheads,laundryroomwithwasheranddryer,largekitchenpantries,island 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 782 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) 47 ProposedCreeksideApartmentsSite stylekitchens,impactratedwindows,granitecountertopsinkitchenandbaths,doublesinksinmaster bath,customwoodblinds,bathroomlinenclosets,balconies,and9'Ceilings UnderConstructionProperties MagnoliaSquareApartments MagnoliaSquareApartmentswillbea290Ͳunitapartmentdevelopmentlocatedat5926NGoodlette FrankRdinNaples.ThepropertyisunderconstructionanddeliversMay2021.Thepropertywas previouslyproposedfora325ͲunitcomplextobecalledPineRidgeCommons.Communityamenities includeoneparkinggarage,swimmingpool,poolcourtyard,fountaincourtyard,terrace,dogpark,Zen garden,andmiscellaneoussiteamenities.Rentalrateshavenotbeendisclosedatthispointinthe propertiesdevelopment.Again,itisimportanttonotethatthisistheonlyapartmentprojectunder constructioninthesubject’ssubmarket(NorthNaples). MuranoatThreeOaks MuranoatThreeOakswillbea318Ͳunitapartmentcomplexlocatedat17167ThreeOaksPkwyinFort Myers.ThepropertyisunderconstructionanddeliversOctober2020.Therewillbestudio,oneͲ,twoͲ, andthreeͲbedroomfloorplansranginginsizefrom610to1,274squarefeet.Baserentswillrange from$1,300upto$1,952permonth.PreleasingbeganJuly19,2020withdiscountsofoneͲmonthfree andstandarddepositwaivedwithapprovedcredit.Communityfeaturesincludelandscapedand fencedpetpark,coworkingcenter,poolwithsunshelfandcabanas,outdoorkitchenwithfourgrills andbarseating,petspa,outdoorpavilion,garden,fitnesscenter,spinroom,yogastudio,sportfield, clubroomlounge,demonstrationkitchen,packagelockers,andprivategarages.Apartmentamenities includeprivatebalconiesandpatios,quartzcountertopswithtilebacksplash,nineͲfootceilings,wood plankͲstyleflooring,customcabinets,stainlessappliances,underͲmountskinks,pendantlighting, walkͲinclosets,soakingtubs,inͲhomewasheranddryer,andkeyfobentry. TheReserveatCoconutPoint TheReserveatCoconutPointwillbea180Ͳunitapartmentcomplexlocatedat9011WilliamsRdin Estero.ThepropertyisunderconstructionanddeliversMarch2021.TherewillbeoneandtwoͲ bedroomfloorplansranginginsizefrom751to1,023squarefeet.Thiswillbetheonlymultifamily rentalpropertywithinCoconutPoint.Communityfeaturesclubhouse,fitnesscenter,BBQarea,trellis areas,pool,boccecourt,andboardwalk. Lago Lagowillbea320Ͳunitapartmentcomplexlocatedat10200SweetgrassCirinNaples.Thepropertyis underconstructionanddeliversthefirstquarterof2021.TherewillbeoneͲ,twoͲ,andthreeͲbedroom floorplansranginginsizefrom886to1,529squarefeet.Baserentswillrangefrom$1,694upto $2,430permonth.Preleasinghasbegunandincludediscountsofthefirstmonth’srentfreeifyou applywithin48Ͳhoursafteryourtour.Communityfeaturesinclude20electriccarchargingstations, 24Ͳhourfitnesscenter,24Ͳhourmaintenance,petspa,enclosedbarkpark,winestorage,wineroom, demonstrationkitchen,clubhousesociallounge,gameRoomwithpooltableandpingͲpongtable, library,conferenceroom,pool,outdoorbarbecuegrills,walkingtrails,carwash,puttinggreen, 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 783 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) 48 ProposedCreeksideApartmentsSite outdoorfireplaces,controlledaccess,elevators,courtesyofficeronͲsite,petfriendly,andpetwaste stations.ApartmentamenitiesincludenineͲfootceilings,woodplankͲinspiredflooring,grayshaker cabinets,brushednickelfixturesinkitchens,chromefixturesinbathrooms,quartzcountertops, designerbacksplash,attachedanddetachedgarages,contemporarylighting,dishwasher,washerand dryer,sideͲbyͲsiderefrigerator,electricrange,stainlesssteelappliances,energyͲefficientwindow, energyͲefficientheatingandcooling,LEDlights,anddetachedstorageavailable. OnyxTownhomeVillas OnyxTownhomeVillaswillbea48Ͳunittownhomevillascomplexlocatedat32840SantaBarbaraBlvd inNaples.ThepropertyisunderconstructionanddeliversJune2021.TherewillbethreeandfourͲ bedroomfloorplans.AllresidentswillbeprovidedwithaoneͲyearsocialmembershiptotheClassics CountryClubatLelyResort.Communityfeaturesincludeclubhouse,pool,gym,andpetfriendly. Apartmentamenitiesincludegarages,impactwindowsanddoors,hurricaneͲproofconstruction, insulatedentry,highefficiencyscreenedwindows,paverdriveways,professionallandscaping, automaticsprinklers,privatelanai/sunroom,porcelaintile,carpet,walk0inclosets,laundryroom, smartlocks,LEEDlighting,andquartzcountertops. Edge75 Edge75willbea320Ͳunitapartmentcomplexlocatedat115JoyrosePlinNaples.The40Ͳacresiteis nexttoFronterraandbehindMcDonald’sandTacoBelloffDavisBoulevardnearInterstate75.The propertyisunderconstructionanddeliversin2021.TherewillbeoneͲ,twoͲ,andthreeͲbedroomfloor plansranginginsizefrom751to1,303squarefeet. TheCrestatNaples TheCrestatNapleswillbea200Ͳunitapartmentcomplexlocatedat11500TamiamiTrlEinNaples. ThepropertyisunderconstructionanddeliversApril2021.TherewillbeoneͲ,twoͲ,andthreeͲ bedroomfloorplans.Communityfeaturesincludeclubhousewithrecreationcenter,fitnesscenter, aerobics/yoga/pilatesroom,billiards/gameroom,businesscenter,swimmingpool,BBQ/picnic facilities,children’splayground,gateͲsecuredaccess,valettrash,storageinunits,WiͲfiincommons areas,outdoorkitchenwithgrillarea,anddogpark.. TheCrestatBonitaSprings TheCrestatBonitaSpringswillbea264Ͳunitapartmentcomplexlocatedat28000CrestPreserveCir inBonitaSprings.ThepropertyisunderconstructionanddeliversJanuary2021.TherewillbeoneͲ, twoͲ,andthreeͲbedroomfloorplans.Communityfeaturesincludeheatedsaltwaterpool,clubhouse, fitnesscenterwithgroupclassesandfreeweights,freebikeandpaddleboardrentals,bocceball court,firepits,grillingstations,anoutdoorkitchen,onͲsitemaintenanceandmanagement,pet friendlycommunitywithoutbreedorweightrestrictions,andfeaturesbothwalkingtrailsandan onsitedogpark.Apartmentamenitiesincludegranitecountertops,soakingtubs,walkͲinshowers, efficientappliancesandscenicviews.  9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 784 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) 49 ProposedCreeksideApartmentsSite BriarwoodApartments BriarwoodApartmentswillbea320Ͳunitapartmentdevelopmentlocatedatthenortheastcornerof LivingstonRoadandRadioRoadinintheBriarwoodsubdivisionofNaples.Thepropertyiscurrently underconstructionAmenitiesincludeclubhouse,maintenancebuilding,6Ͳbaygarage,trash compactor,recyclingenclosure,mailkiosk,poolcabana,andmore. Baumgarten TheBaumgartenplannedunitdevelopmentlocatedatthesoutheastcornerofImmokaleeRoadand CollierBoulevardisproposedfor370,000squarefeetofcommercialspace,400multifamilyresidential dwellingunitsand140hotelrooms.CurrentdevelopmentplansincludeThePointatFoundersSquare whichwillfeature38,000±squarefeetofretailandrestaurants.Therearealsoplansfora35,000 squarefootmedicalofficebuilding,110,000squarefootselfͲstoragefacility,andnationalgasstation. TheHaldemanwillfeature400±classAluxuryapartmentsinfivebuildingona25±acreportionofthe PUD. Edge75byWatermark 320classAapartmentsareunderconstructionnearthenorthwestcornerofDavisBoulevardand CollierBoulevard,justsouthofInterstate75inNaples.Communityamenitieswillincludeafitness center,swimmingpool,spa,poolsidegrillingstations,lawngames,outdoorfireplace,bikeracks, outdoorTVlounge,clubhouse,coffeebar,gameroom,wetlounge,dogpark,petspa,andmore. Apartmentamenitieswillincludequartzcountertops,whitecabinetry,mosaicbacksplash,stainless steelenergyefficientappliances,pucklightinginkitchen,woodlikevinylflooring,andUSBoutlets.  9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 785 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) 50 ProposedCreeksideApartmentsSite ProposedProperties 1ViaCoconutPl A330Ͳunitapartmentcomplexisproposedforconstructionat1ViaCoconutPlinEstero.The developmentbreaksgroundAugust2020.TherewillbeoneͲ,twoͲ,andthreeͲbedroomfloorplans ranginginsizefrom858to1,463squarefeet.Amenitieswillinclude24Ͳhouraccess,dock,keyfob entry,petplayarea,picnicarea,pond,andpool. CoconutCrossings CoconutCrossingsisa330Ͳunitapartmentcomplexproposedforconstructionat23281LyndenDrin Estero.ThedevelopmentbreaksgroundAugust2020. CorkscrewCrossing 130singleͲfamilyhomesand495multifamilyunitsareproposedforconstructioninCorkscrew Crossingat13500CorkscrewRdinEstero.ThedevelopmentbreaksgroundSeptember2020.There willbeoneͲ,twoͲ,andthreeͲbedroomfloorplansranginginsizefrom800to1,150squarefeet.There willbe218acresofpreservefeaturinglakes,naturalareasandanamenitycenter. TheEsteroCrossing A306Ͳunitapartmentcomplexisproposedforconstructionat10500CorkscrewRdinEstero.The developmentbreaksgroundSeptember2020.Therewillbestudio,oneͲ,andtwoͲbedroomfloorplans and60,000squarefeetofcommercialspace.Thedeveloperreducedthenumberofapartmentunits from350to306andplannedbuildingheightsfromfourstoriestothreestories. ViaCoconutUrbanPlace A297Ͳunitapartmentcomplexisproposedforconstructionat9301CorkscrewRdinEstero.The developmentbreaksgroundSeptember2020. CourthouseShadows TheformerCourthouseShadowsShoppingCenterinEastNaplesisproposedforredevelopment.The BoardofCountyCommissionersapprovedanincreaseindensityattheendof2019tomakethe300Ͳ unitapartmentredevelopmentpossible.Developersnowneedsitedevelopmentplansanddemolition permitstobeapproved.AsofFebruary2020,CourthouseShadowsismovingforward,and constructioncouldbestartedinthenextyear. HammockPark A265ͲunitapartmentcomplexisproposedforconstructionatthenortheastcornerofRattlesnake HammockRoadandCountyRoad951inEastNaples.Therewillalsobe148,500squarefeetofnonͲ residentialuses. 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 786 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) 51 ProposedCreeksideApartmentsSite HiddenHammock 240multifamilyunitsareproposedforconstructioninattheeastendofCapeRomanoRoad,justwest ofInterstate75inEstero.Siteareais38.75acresandwaspurchasedbyTaylorMorrison,Inc.in2013. MultifamilyMarketOutlookandConclusions Basedonourresearch,wehaveidentifiednineapartmentcommunitieswithintheprimarymarket areathatwouldbecompetitiveinnaturewiththesubjectproperty.Insummary,thesubject’s competitionisdetailedinthetablebelow.  PrimaryMarketSupply # Property YearBuilt #ofUnits Status Occupancy 1AddisonPlace 2018 294 Stabilized 97.28% 2 SpringsatHammockCove 2019 340 Recentlycompleted 73.82% 3AsteratLely 2015 308 Stabilized 97.08% 4 Inspira 2018 304 Stabilized 96.05% 5 MilanoLakes 2018 296 Stabilized 96.96% 6LegacyNaples 2019 304 Recentlycompleted 89.47% 7OrchidRun 2015 282 Stabilized 98.23% Relevantstatisticsaresummarizedasfollows: VacancyRateIndications MarketSegmentVacancyRate MetroArea9.82% SubjectMarketArea8.69% Competitors(Overall)7.30% Competitors(Stabilized)4.16%  Themultifamilymarkethasbeenstrengtheninginrecentyearsandvacancyrateshavecontinuedto decline.Propertiesrecentlycompletedorcurrentlyunderconstructionarereportinggoodabsorption rates.Demandisprojectedtoremainstrongovertheshortandlongtermprojections.Theonlythreat wouldbefromanoverbuildingofthemarketthatcouldoccurifthedevelopmentpipelinecontinues toaddadditionalsupplywithoutimprovingmarketfundamentals.Incomparisontoothersubmarkets intheregion,theprimarymarketareaisratedasfollows: 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 787 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) 52 ProposedCreeksideApartmentsSite SubmarketAttributeRatings MarketSize/StatureAverage MarketDemandIncreasing VacancyTrendsStable ThreatofNewSupplyAboveAverage RentalTrendsIncreasing  DemandAnalysis Thefactorsthatwillaffectthedemandformultifamilyapartmentunitsarediscussedinthefollowing paragraphs. DemandGenerators CollierCounty ͲNaplesCommunityHospital ͲLandmarkHospital ͲArthrex LeeCounty ͲHertzCorporate Conclusion Asconcluded,thesubjectiscompetitivelyplaced(positivelocationalattributestocapturedemand) withinthemarketandashaspositivedemographicandincomecharacteristics.Overall,thesubjectis locatedincloseproximitytothemajordemandgenerators.Inaddition,employmentgrowthinthe areaisexpectedtocontinueasevidencedbythespecificexamplespreviouslygiven.Theproposed subjectiswellpositionedtocapturecurrentandfuturedemandfromallofthemajoremployment generatorswithinthemarket.Pleasenotethatthereislittletonocompetitionintheimmediatearea, andbarrierstoentryarehighfornewconstructionsincethereislittlelandavailablefordevelopment intheimmediatearea.  9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 788 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) 53 ProposedCreeksideApartmentsSite Demographics Demographicandeconomictrendsinfluencerealestatedemand,especiallyformultifamilyhousing. Wehaveprovideddemographicspertainingtoourprimarymarketarea(PMA)whichincludedboth CollierandLeeCounties.Aspreviouslyidentified,thesubject’sdirectcompetitorsarelocatedwithina 5ͲmileradiusofLakewoodRanch.Therefore,wehavepresenteddemographicsrelatingtothe5Ͳmile radiusonthepagethatfollows. InferredDemand ThecurrentvacancyratefortheMetroAreais9.82%.Thestabilizedcompetitivecommunities currentlyhavelowvacancyratesrangingbetween1.77%and10.53%.Theoverallmultifamilymarket hasbeenstrengtheningoverthepastthreeyearsanddemandisprojectedtoremainstrongoverthe shortterm. Anothergoodindicatorofdemandisabsorptionstatisticsobtainedfromnewprojectswithinthe market.Thechartshownbelowsummarizesourfindings. AbsorptionComparables # Property YearBuilt #ofUnits MonthstoStabilization MonthlyAbsorption 1 AddisonPlace 2018 294 15 20 2SpringsatHammockCove 2019 340 Recentlycompleted N/A 3AsteratLely 2015 308 27 11 4 Inspira 2018 304 21 14 5 MilanoLakes 2018 296 24 12 6LegacyNaples 2019 304 Recentlycompleted N/A 7OrchidRun 2015 282 9 31  Thestabilizedprojectsindicateabsorptionratesof11to31unitspermonthwithanaverageof18; however,thesenumbersareconsideredunderstatedassomeoftherecentlycompleted developmentshavealreadyreachedstabilizedoccupancylevelsindicatinghigherabsorptionlevels. Giventhecharacteristicsofthecurrentmarket,itisconcludedthatthesubjectcouldexpecttohavea similarabsorptionrate.  9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 789 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) 54 ProposedCreeksideApartmentsSite FundamentalDemand Toestimatedemandformultifamilydevelopmentintheprimarymarketarea,wehavereliedupon demographicdatapresentedbyClaritas.Aspreviouslymentioned,wehaveidentifiedtheprimary marketareaasthe5Ͳmileradiussurroundingthesubjectlocation.Overthepasttwoyears,thisarea hasalsoexperiencedanincreaseinapartmentinventory.Inaddition,wehaveresearchedthe proposedprojectswithinthisarea. Asofthecurrenttime,the5Ͳmileradiushasanestimatedtotalpopulationof115,443.Thepopulation isprojectedtoincreaseto125,001over5Ͳyears.ThepopulationincreaseisprojectedstraightͲline overtheanalysisperiod.Theaveragehouseholdsizeis2.1persons,whichisestimatedtoremain stableoverthenextfiveyears.Ofthepopulationin2020,73%isreportedasowneroccupied dwellingsand27%isreportedasrenteroccupieddwellings.Consideringthissegmentation,wehave estimatedapartmentrentersat27%ofthepopulation. Overall,baserentsintheprimarymarketareahaveanaverageof$1,600permonth.Basedona marketstandardaffordabilityfactorof35%(i.e.,rentshouldnotbegreaterthan35%ofhousehold income),thesubjectrentsindicatethathouseholdsneedtobeintheincomerangeofapproximately $55,000ormore.Basedontheeconomicdatafortheprimarymarketarea,approximately62%ofthe populationcouldaffordaunitwithinthemarketarea.Thesubject’sproposednewconstructioncould beexpectedtohavehigherrents;basedonourconcludedmarketrents,thesubject’saverage monthlyrentis$1,965.Basedonamarketstandardaffordabilityfactorof35%(i.e.,rentshouldnotbe greaterthan35%ofhouseholdincome),thesubjectrentsindicatethathouseholdsneedtobeinthe incomerangeofapproximately$67,000ormore.Basedontheeconomicdatafortheprimarymarket area,approximately55%ofthepopulationcouldaffordaunitwithinthemarketarea.Basedonour analysisoftheeconomicsegments,wehaveconcludedthatapproximately55%oftheeconomicbase couldaffordthesubject. Totalpotentialdemandforoccupiedunitsinsubjecteconomicsegmentisestimatedat8,581units, increasingto9,281unitsoverthenextfiveyear.Thisaccountsfor5%frictionalvacancy. Costarreportsthereareatotalof5,901multifamilyunitswithina5Ͳmileradiusofthesubject location.Wehaveutilizedthisinouranalysis. Inclusiveofthesubject,weareawareof290multifamilyunitscurrentlyunderconstructionwithinthe 5Ͳmileradius.ThisdoesNOTincludethesubject’sproposed300units.Therefore,wehave acknowledgedtheprojectscurrentlyunderconstructionorplannedandestimate264unitswillbe completedinyearͲ1andsubject’stobecompletedinyearͲ2.Wealsonotethatnotallplanned constructionstartsconstruction.Forthepurposesofthisreport,wehaveconcludedto250unitsnew constructionperyearfortheremainingyears. Thecurrentresultingestimatedmarketoccupancyratebasedonourfundamentaldemandanalysisis 138.5%decreasingto122.1%asmultiͲfamilydevelopmentcomesonͲlineoverthenext5Ͳyears.This indicatesthattheareaisinastatewheredemandisexpectedtooutweighsupplyfortheforeseeable futurewithinthe5Ͳmileradiusofthesubjectarea.Thiscomparestoanaveragesubmarketvacancy rate8.69%reportedandtheaveragevacancyrateof5.26%atthestabilizedcompetingproperties. 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 790 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) 55 ProposedCreeksideApartmentsSite Overall,thedemandanalysisbythesegmentationmethodisgenerallyconsistentwithcurrentmarket trendsofnewerproperties.Theanalysisisshownonthepagethatfollows. ApartmentDemandbySegmentationMethod Current Year1Year2Year3Year4Year5Comments 1 PopulationForecast 115,443 117,355119,266121,178123,089125,0015ͲMileRadius 2AverageIncreaseperYear 1,9121,9121,9121,9121,912SpotlightForecast 3AverageHouseholdSize 2.12.12.12.12.12.1Stableoverprojectionperiod 4 OccupiedHousingUnitDemand(TotalHouseholds) 55,03155,88356,79357,70458,61459,524Line1dividedbyLine3 5PercentageofRentalUnits 27.0% 27.0% 27.0% 27.0% 27.0% 27.0% Analyst'sForecast 6PotentialDemandforApartments 14,85815,08815,33415,58015,82616,072Line4timesLine5 7PercentageAbletoAffordUnits(EconomicSegment) 55.0% 55.0% 55.0% 55.0% 55.0% 55.0% Analyst'sForecast 8TotalPotentialDemandforOccupiedUnits(EconomicSegment) 8,172 8,299 8,434 8,569 8,704 8,839 Line6timesLine7 9PlusFrictionalVacancy@5% 409 415 422 428 435 442 10 TotalPotentialDemandforUnits(EconomicSegment) 8,5818,7148,8568,9979,1399,281Line8plusLine9 11 YearStartingCompetitiveSupply 5,9015,9016,1916,4916,7416,991 12 NewConstruction Ͳ290300250250250Analyst'sForecast 13 TotalCompetitiveSupply 5,9016,1916,4916,7416,9917,241 14 ResidualDemand 2,6802,5232,3652,2562,1482,040Line10minusLine13 15 EstimatedMarketOccupancyRate 138.5% 134.0% 129.9% 127.1% 124.5% 122.1%Line8dividedbyLine13  Conclusion Overall,thedemandanalysisindicatesthatthecurrentmarketisundersupplied.Accountingforthe frictionalvacancy,demandisgreaterthanthecurrentsupplyandisprojectedtoremainthesameover thenextyear.EvenwhenfactoringintheadditionalunitsthatareprojectedtocomeonͲlineoverthe nextthreetofiveyears,demandremainsgenerallyconsistentwiththesupply,indicatingastablelow vacancyrateoverthenextfiveyears.Overall,thedemandestimateindicatestheneedforadditional newsupplyovertheshortandlongtermprojections. Overall,thedatagatheredfromthemarketindicatessupportforadditionalsupply.Multifamily apartmenttrendshavebeenstrongoverthepastthreeyearsandareprojectedtoremainpositive intotheforeseeablefuture.Thereareseveralprojectsunderconstruction,aswellas,several proposedpropertiesfortheprimarymarketplanned;however,astheeconomycontinuestorecover, newjobgrowthisexpectedtohelpcontinuefueldemandforadditionalsupply.Thesubject’s locationalanddemographicindicationsprovidepositivesupporttocaptureorattractdemandthatis notcurrentlybeingrecognizedwithinthemarket  9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 791 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) Certification56 ProposedCreeksideApartmentsSite Certification Wecertifythat,tothebestofourknowledgeandbelief: 1. Thestatementsoffactcontainedinthisreportaretrueandcorrect. 2. Thereportedanalyses,opinions,andconclusionsarelimitedonlybythereportedassumptionsandlimiting conditions,andareourpersonal,impartial,andunbiasedprofessionalanalyses,opinions,andconclusions. 3. Wehavenopresentorprospectiveinterestinthepropertythatisthesubjectofthisreportandnopersonal interestwithrespecttothepartiesinvolved. 4. Wehavepreviouslyprovidedafeasibilityanalysisofthepropertythatisthesubjectofthisreportforanother client.Wehaveprovidednootherservices,asanappraiserorinanyothercapacity,regardingthepropertythatis thesubjectofthisreportwithinthethreeͲyearperiodimmediatelyprecedingtheagreementtoperformthis assignment. 5. Wehavenobiaswithrespecttothepropertythatisthesubjectofthisreportortothepartiesinvolvedwiththis assignment. 6. Ourengagementinthisassignmentwasnotcontingentupondevelopingorreportingpredeterminedresults. 7. Ourcompensationforcompletingthisassignmentisnotcontingentuponthedevelopmentorreportingofa predeterminedvalueordirectioninvaluethatfavorsthecauseoftheclient,theamountofthevalueopinion,the attainmentofastipulatedresult,ortheoccurrenceofasubsequenteventdirectlyrelatedtotheintendeduseof thisappraisal. 8. Ouranalyses,opinions,andconclusionsweredeveloped,andthisreporthasbeenprepared,inconformitywiththe UniformStandardsofProfessionalAppraisalPracticeaswellasapplicablestateappraisalregulations. 9. Thereportedanalyses,opinions,andconclusionsweredeveloped,andthisreporthasbeenprepared,in conformitywiththerequirementsoftheCodeofProfessionalEthicsandStandardsofProfessionalAppraisal PracticeoftheAppraisalInstitute. 10. TheuseofthisreportissubjecttotherequirementsoftheAppraisalInstituterelatingtoreviewbyitsduly authorizedrepresentatives. 11. JulianL.H.StokesII,MAI,madeapersonalinspectionofthepropertythatisthesubjectofthisreport.CarltonJ. Lloyd,MAI,haspreviouslyinspectedthesubject.StevenB.Stokeshaspreviouslyinspectedthesubject. 12. SignificantrealpropertyappraisalassistancewasprovidedbyStevenB.Stokeswhohasnotsignedthis certification. 13. WehaveexperienceinappraisingpropertiessimilartothesubjectandareincompliancewiththeCompetency RuleofUSPAP. 14. Asofthedate of this report, Julian L.H. Stokes II, MAI and Carlton J. Lloyd, MAI, have completed the continuing educationprogramforDesignatedMembersoftheAppraisalInstitute. JulianL.H.StokesII,MAI FLStateͲCertifiedGeneralREAppraiserRZ3537 CarltonJ.Lloyd,MAI FLStateͲCertifiedGeneralREAppraiserRZ2618 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 792 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) AssumptionsandLimitingConditions57 ProposedCreeksideApartmentsSite AssumptionsandLimitingConditions Thisappraisalandanyotherworkproductrelatedtothisengagementarelimitedbythefollowing standardassumptions,exceptasotherwisenotedinthereport: 1.Thetitleismarketableandfreeandclearofallliens,encumbrances,encroachments, easementsandrestrictions.Thepropertyisunderresponsibleownershipandcompetent managementandisavailableforitshighestandbestuse. 2.Therearenoexistingjudgmentsorpendingorthreatenedlitigationthatcouldaffectthevalue oftheproperty. 3.Therearenohiddenorundisclosedconditionsofthelandoroftheimprovementsthatwould renderthepropertymoreorlessvaluable.Furthermore,thereisnoasbestosintheproperty. 4.Therevenuestampsplacedonanydeedreferencedhereintoindicatethesalepricearein correctrelationtotheactualdollaramountofthetransaction. 5.Thepropertyisincompliancewithallapplicablebuilding,environmental,zoning,andother federal,stateandlocallaws,regulationsandcodes. 6.Theinformationfurnishedbyothersisbelievedtobereliable,butnowarrantyisgivenforits accuracy. Thisappraisalandanyotherworkproductrelatedtothisengagementaresubjecttothefollowing limitingconditions,exceptasotherwisenotedinthereport: 1.Anappraisalisinherentlysubjectiveandrepresentsouropinionastothevalueofthe propertyappraised. 2.Theconclusionsstatedinourappraisalapplyonlyasoftheeffectivedateoftheappraisal,and norepresentationismadeastotheeffectofsubsequentevents. 3.Nochangesinanyfederal,stateorlocallaws,regulationsorcodes(including,without limitation,theInternalRevenueCode)areanticipated. 4.Noenvironmentalimpactstudieswereeitherrequestedormadeinconjunctionwiththis appraisal,andwereservetherighttoreviseorrescindanyofthevalueopinionsbasedupon anysubsequentenvironmentalimpactstudies.Ifanyenvironmentalimpactstatementis requiredbylaw,theappraisalassumesthatsuchstatementwillbefavorableandwillbe approvedbytheappropriateregulatorybodies. 5.Unlessotherwiseagreedtoinwriting,wearenotrequiredtogivetestimony,respondtoany subpoenaorattendanycourt,governmentalorotherhearingwithreferencetotheproperty withoutcompensationrelativetosuchadditionalemployment. 6.Wehavemadenosurveyofthepropertyandassumenoresponsibilityinconnectionwith suchmatters.Anysketchorsurveyofthepropertyincludedinthisreportisforillustrative purposesonlyandshouldnotbeconsideredtobescaledaccuratelyforsize.Theappraisal   9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 793 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) AssumptionsandLimitingConditions58 ProposedCreeksideApartmentsSite coversthepropertyasdescribedinthisreport,andtheareasanddimensionssetforthare assumedtobecorrect. 7.Noopinionisexpressedastothevalueofsubsurfaceoil,gasormineralrights,ifany,andwe haveassumedthatthepropertyisnotsubjecttosurfaceentryfortheexplorationorremoval ofsuchmaterials,unlessotherwisenotedinourappraisal. 8.Weacceptnoresponsibilityforconsiderationsrequiringexpertiseinotherfields.Such considerationsinclude,butarenotlimitedto,legaldescriptionsandotherlegalmatterssuch aslegaltitle,geologicconsiderationssuchassoilsandseismicstability;andcivil,mechanical, electrical,structuralandotherengineeringandenvironmentalmatters.Suchconsiderations mayalsoincludedeterminationsofcompliancewithzoningandotherfederal,state,andlocal laws,regulationsandcodes. 9.Thedistributionofthetotalvaluationinthereportbetweenlandandimprovementsapplies onlyunderthereportedhighestandbestuseoftheproperty.Theallocationsofvalueforland andimprovementsmustnotbeusedinconjunctionwithanyotherappraisalandareinvalidif soused.Theappraisalreportshallbeconsideredonlyinitsentirety.Nopartoftheappraisal reportshallbeutilizedseparatelyoroutofcontext. 10.Neitherallnoranypartofthecontentsofthisreport(especiallyanyconclusionsastovalue, theidentityoftheappraisers,oranyreferencetotheAppraisalInstitute)shallbe disseminatedthroughadvertisingmedia,publicrelationsmedia,newsmediaoranyother meansofcommunication(includingwithoutlimitationprospectuses,privateoffering memorandaandotherofferingmaterialprovidedtoprospectiveinvestors)withouttheprior writtenconsentofthepersonssigningthereport. 11.Information,estimatesandopinionscontainedinthereportandobtainedfromthirdͲparty sourcesareassumedtobereliableandhavenotbeenindependentlyverified. 12.Anyincomeandexpenseestimatescontainedintheappraisalreportareusedonlyforthe purposeofestimatingvalueanddonotconstitutepredictionsoffutureoperatingresults. 13.Ifthepropertyissubjecttooneormoreleases,anyestimateofresidualvaluecontainedin theappraisalmaybeparticularlyaffectedbysignificantchangesintheconditionofthe economy,oftherealestateindustry,oroftheappraisedpropertyatthetimetheseleases expireorotherwiseterminate. 14.Unlessotherwisestatedinthereport,noconsiderationhasbeengiventopersonalproperty locatedonthepremisesortothecostofmovingorrelocatingsuchpersonalproperty;only therealpropertyhasbeenconsidered. 15.Thecurrentpurchasingpowerofthedollaristhebasisforthevaluesstatedintheappraisal; wehaveassumedthatnoextremefluctuationsineconomiccycleswilloccur. 16.Thevaluesfoundhereinaresubjecttotheseandtoanyotherassumptionsorconditionsset forthinthebodyofthisreportbutwhichmayhavebeenomittedfromthislistofAssumptions andLimitingConditions. 17.Theanalysescontainedinthereportnecessarilyincorporatenumerousestimatesand assumptionsregardingpropertyperformance,generalandlocalbusinessandeconomic 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 794 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) AssumptionsandLimitingConditions59 ProposedCreeksideApartmentsSite conditions,theabsenceofmaterialchangesinthecompetitiveenvironmentandother matters.Someestimatesorassumptions,however,inevitablywillnotmaterialize,and unanticipatedeventsandcircumstancesmayoccur;therefore,actualresultsachievedduring theperiodcoveredbyouranalysiswillvaryfromourestimates,andthevariationsmaybe material. 18.TheAmericanswithDisabilitiesAct(ADA)becameeffectiveJanuary26,1992.Wehavenot madeaspecificsurveyoranalysisofthepropertytodeterminewhetherthephysicalaspects oftheimprovementsmeettheADAaccessibilityguidelines.WeclaimnoexpertiseinADA issues,andrendernoopinionregardingcomplianceofthesubjectwithADAregulations. Inasmuchascompliancematcheseachowner’sfinancialabilitywiththecosttocurethenonͲ conformingphysicalcharacteristicsofaproperty,aspecificstudyofboththeowner’sfinancial abilityandthecosttocureanydeficiencieswouldbeneededfortheDepartmentofJusticeto determinecompliance. 19.Theappraisalreportispreparedfortheexclusivebenefitofyou,yoursubsidiariesand/or affiliates.Itmaynotbeusedorrelieduponbyanyotherparty.Allpartieswhouseorrely uponanyinformationinthereportwithoutourwrittenconsentdosoattheirownrisk. 20.Nostudieshavebeenprovidedtousindicatingthepresenceorabsenceofhazardous materialsonthesubjectpropertyorintheimprovements,andourvaluationispredicated upontheassumptionthatthesubjectpropertyisfreeandclearofanyenvironmenthazards including,withoutlimitation,hazardouswastes,toxicsubstancesandmold.No representationsorwarrantiesaremaderegardingtheenvironmentalconditionofthesubject property.IRRͲSouthwestFlorida,IntegraRealtyResources,Inc.,andtheirrespectiveofficers, owners,managers,directors,agents,subcontractorsoremployees(the“IntegraParties”), shallnotberesponsibleforanysuchenvironmentalconditionsthatdoexistorforany engineeringortestingthatmightberequiredtodiscoverwhethersuchconditionsexist. Becausewearenotexpertsinthefieldofenvironmentalconditions,theappraisalreport cannotbeconsideredasanenvironmentalassessmentofthesubjectproperty. 21.Thepersonssigningthereportmayhavereviewedavailablefloodmapsandmayhavenoted intheappraisalreportwhetherthesubjectpropertyislocatedinanidentifiedSpecialFlood HazardArea.However,wearenotqualifiedtodetectsuchareasandthereforedonot guaranteesuchdeterminations.Thepresenceoffloodplainareasand/orwetlandsmayaffect thevalueoftheproperty,andthevalueconclusionispredicatedontheassumptionthat wetlandsarenonͲexistentorminimal. 22.Wearenotabuildingorenvironmentalinspector.TheIntegraPartiesdonotguaranteethat thesubjectpropertyisfreeofdefectsorenvironmentalproblems.Moldmaybepresentinthe subjectpropertyandaprofessionalinspectionisrecommended. 23.Theappraisalreportandvalueconclusionsforanappraisalassumethesatisfactory completionofconstruction,repairsoralterationsinaworkmanlikemanner. 24.IRRͲSouthwestFloridaisanindependentlyownedandoperatedcompany,whichhas preparedtheappraisalforthespecificintendedusestatedelsewhereinthereport.Theuseof theappraisalreportbyanyoneotherthantheClientisprohibitedexceptasotherwise provided.Accordingly,theappraisalreportisaddressedtoandshallbesolelyfortheClient’s 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 795 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) AssumptionsandLimitingConditions60 ProposedCreeksideApartmentsSite useandbenefitunlessweprovideourpriorwrittenconsent.Weexpresslyreservethe unrestrictedrighttowithholdourconsenttoyourdisclosureoftheappraisalreportorany otherworkproductrelatedtotheengagement(oranypartthereofincluding,without limitation,conclusionsofvalueandouridentity),toanythirdparties.Statedagainfor clarification,unlessourpriorwrittenconsentisobtained,nothirdpartymayrelyonthe appraisalreport(eveniftheirreliancewasforeseeable). 25.Theconclusionsofthisreportareestimatesbasedonknowncurrenttrendsandreasonably foreseeablefutureoccurrences.Theseestimatesarebasedpartlyonpropertyinformation, dataobtainedinpublicrecords,interviews,existingtrends,buyerͲsellerdecisioncriteriainthe currentmarket,andresearchconductedbythirdparties,andsuchdataarenotalways completelyreliable.TheIntegraPartiesarenotresponsiblefortheseandotherfuture occurrencesthatcouldnothavereasonablybeenforeseenontheeffectivedateofthis assignment.Furthermore,itisinevitablethatsomeassumptionswillnotmaterializeandthat unanticipatedeventsmayoccurthatwilllikelyaffectactualperformance.Whileweareofthe opinionthatourfindingsarereasonablebasedoncurrentmarketconditions,wedonot representthattheseestimateswillactuallybeachieved,astheyaresubjecttoconsiderable riskanduncertainty.Moreover,weassumecompetentandeffectivemanagementand marketingforthedurationoftheprojectedholdingperiodofthisproperty. 26.Allprospectivevalueopinionspresentedinthisreportareestimatesandforecastswhichare prospectiveinnatureandaresubjecttoconsiderableriskanduncertainty.Inadditiontothe contingenciesnotedintheprecedingparagraph,severaleventsmayoccurthatcould substantiallyaltertheoutcomeofourestimatessuchas,butnotlimitedtochangesinthe economy,interestrates,andcapitalizationrates,behaviorofconsumers,investorsand lenders,fireandotherphysicaldestruction,changesintitleorconveyancesofeasementsand deedrestrictions,etc.Itisassumedthatconditionsreasonablyforeseeableatthepresent timeareconsistentorsimilarwiththefuture. 27.Theappraisalisalsosubjecttothefollowing: ExtraordinaryAssumptionsandHypotheticalConditions 1. Inadditiontobeingconstructedinaccordancewithallconstructionregulations,itisassumedtheproposed improvementswillbeconstructedwithgoodqualityfinishes,similartothatofcompetingpropertiesor similartothecurrentmarketstandardsofa“ClassA/B”apartmentcomplex. 2. ItisanassumptionthatthesubjectwillberezonedandapprovedfordevelopmentofamidtohighͲrise apartmentdevelopment. 1. None;N/A. Theuseofanyextraordinaryassumptionorhypotheticalconditionmayhaveaffectedtheassignmentresults. Thevalueconclusionsarebasedonthefollowinghypotheticalconditions.Ahypotheticalconditionisa condition,directlyrelatedtoaspecificassignment,whichiscontrarytowhatisknownbytheappraisertoexist ontheeffectivedateoftheassignmentresults,butisusedforthepurposeofanalysis. Thevalueconclusionsaresubjecttothefollowingextraordinaryassumptions.Anextraordinaryassumptionisan assignmentͲspecificassumptionasoftheeffectivedateregardinguncertaininformationusedinananalysis which,iffoundtobefalse,couldaltertheappraiser’sopinionsorconclusions.  9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 796 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) Addenda ProposedCreeksideApartmentsSite AddendumA AppraiserQualifications 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 797 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) Carlton J. Lloyd, MAI Southwest Florida Integra Realty Resources irr.com T 239.643.6888 F 239.643.6871 2770 Horseshoe Drive S Suite 3 Naples, FL 34104  Experience Senior Managing Director of Integra Realty Resources Southwest Florida Actively engaged in real estate valuation since 1995. Territories include Collier, Lee, Charlotte, Sarasota, Manatee, Broward, Palm Beach, Miami-Dade, Monroe, Desoto and Hendry Counties. Experienced in Residential Developments (PUDs & Condominiums), Multifamily apartments, Low Income Housing, (LIHTC), office buildings, restaurants, commercial retail centers, industrial warehouse properties, self storage, hotels, net leased properties and subdivisions. Specialty experience includes marina, golf courses and country clubs, and orange groves. Clients include, but are not limited to: federally insured lenders, developers, investors, law firms, mortgage banking firms, local, state, and federal agencies, and individuals. Valuations have been performed for condemnation purposes, estates, financing, equity participation and due diligence and litigation support. Valuations and market studies have been done on proposed, partially completed, renovated and existing structures. Professional Activities & Affiliations Appraisal Institute, Member (MAI) Appraisal Institute, Member (#406018), August 2008 Member: Urban Land Institute, January 2018 Licenses Florida, State Certified General RE Appraiser, RZ#2618, Expires November 2020 North Carolina, State Certified RE Appraiser, A8192, Expires June 2019 Education Carlton graduated with a Bachelor Of Arts Degree from the State University of N.Y. at Albany in 1989. Recent real estate courses include : Appraising Automobile Dealerships Sept 1, 2018 Managing Unusual Appraisal & Litigation Assignments 06/12/2018 Online Business Practices and Ethics 06/08/2018 7-Hour National USPAP Update Course 04/12/2018 Online Real Estate Finance Statistics and Valuation Modeling 06/15-07/15/2016 Reviewing Residential Appraisals and Using Fannie Mae Form 2000 06/01-07/01/2016 Residential Sales Comparison and Income Approach 08/15-09/29/2014 Feasibility, Market Value, Investment Timing: Option Value 08/15-09/14/2012 Fundamentals of Separating Real Property, Personal Property, and Intangible Business Assets 02/29-03/01/2012 The Appraiser as an Expert Witness: Preparation & Testimony 06/04-05/2009 Condemnation Appraising: Principles & Applications 05/06-08/2009 Online Small Hotel/Motel Valuation 11/01-12/01/2008 Online Analyzing Distressed Real Estate 10/15-11/14/2008 Online Condominiums, Co-ops and PUDs 10/15-11/14/2008 Online Appraising From Blueprints and Specifications 09/15-10/15/2006 Online Analyzing Operating Expenses 08/15-09/14/2006 clloyd@irr.com - 239.687.5801 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 798 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) Carlton J. Lloyd, MAI Southwest Florida Integra Realty Resources irr.com T 239.643.6888 F 239.643.6871 2770 Horseshoe Drive S Suite 3 Naples, FL 34104  Education (Cont'd) Online Small Hotel/Motel Valuation 08/15-09/14/2006 Report Writing and Valuation Analysis 07/11-17/2004 Advanced Applications 03/08-13/2004 Highest & Best Use and Market Analysis 10/06-11/2003 Advanced Sales Comparison & Cost Approaches 10/28-11/02/2002 Advanced Income Capitalization 02/07-13/2002 General Applications 03/19-25/2001 Standards of Professional Practice, Part B 08/30/2000 Standards of Professional Practice, Part A (USPAP) 08/28-29/2000 Basic Income Capitalization 08/15-21/1999 clloyd@irr.com - 239.687.5801 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 799 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) Carlton J. Lloyd, MAI Southwest Florida Integra Realty Resources irr.com T 239.643.6888 F 239.643.6871 2770 Horseshoe Drive S Suite 3 Naples, FL 34104  Qualified Before Courts & Administrative Bodies Qualified as an expert witness in U.S. Federal Bankruptcy Court, US District Court-Tampa, Collier County Circuit Court, Lee County Circuit Court and the Tax Appeals Board of Lee County Case History: IEC Rentals Bankruptcy US Bankruptcy Court, Middle District of Florida Case 9:15-bk-2491-FMD Howard Fertilizer & Chemical Company, Inc., A Florida Corporation V. Gulf Citrus Caretaking, Inc., in the Circuit Court Of The Ninth Judicial Circuit In And For Orange County, Florida Case No. 2009-CA-034084-O US. Bank National Association v. Salo & Barnes, Inc., et al. Circuit Court of the Twentieth Judicial Circuit In and For Lee County, Florida, Civil Division Case No. 10-CA-057019 Fedako, Catherine A. adv. Cassidy, John R. In The Circuit Court Of The Twelfth Judicial Circuit In And For Sarasota County, Florida Case No. 2012-DR-8138 PPDG, LLC V J. Dean, Templeton Case No. 2:13-cv-768-FtM-29UAM Gregory Montwill, v. Bank of America, N. A., United States District Court Case No. 13-02965-SDM-TGW, Ongoing Six Mile Preserve LLC v. Kenneth M. Wilkinson, as Property Appraiser, Property Tax Appeal Case No. 13-CA-000704 September 2014 First Berkshire Properties, LLC, v. Kenneth M. Wilkinson, as Property Appraiser, Property Tax Appeal Case No. 13-CA-000702 September 2014 Encore Bank v Implant, General & Cosmetic Dentistry Bankruptcy Case (8:12-bk-18834-MGW) June 2013 Bank Of America/Merrill Lynch V D'Agostino Bankruptcy Case (9:12-bk-06762 ) January 2013 Rookery Bay Business Park, LLC Bankruptcy Case (12-38298-LMI) May 2013 RP Bonita V Acaia, Pending Arbitration Hearing (Settled August 2013) Lake Lincoln, LLC V Manatee County Case 2012-CA3483 (ongoing) UPS Capital V Surety Title Corp, Collier County (09-4938 CA) Deficiency Hearing Synovous Bank V Belaj, Collier County (11-1460-CA) February 2012 Deficiency Hearing Bank of Naples v Palmyra Club Investors Collier County (09-7986-CA) August 2011 Deficiency Hearing BB&T Vs. Naples Plastering Collier County (10-2881-CA) Deficiency Hearing August 2011 BB&T Vs Rialto Holdings Lee County Deficiency Hearing February 2011 RBC Vs R&D Collier, Collier County Deficiency Hearing May 2011 Fiddlers Creek Bankruptcy Hearing Federal Bankruptcy Court Case 8:10-bk-03846-KRM Multiple dates 2011 Moody River Estates, Lee County 20th Circuit Court Case 07-CA-88197. August 2010 BB&T vs Lee Wetherington Homes . Lee County 20th Circuit Court Case 07-CA-88197.June 2010 Eight Peaks Capital Vs Bald Eagle Group LLC Federal Bankruptcy Court Case 08-8902CA-01 April 2010 Bank Of Florida vs Bradford Square Collier County Uniform Case Number 112009CA0025920001XX April 2010 clloyd@irr.com - 239.687.5801 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 800 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 801 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) Mr. Julian L. Stokes, II, MAI Southwest Florida Integra Realty Resources irr.com T 239-643-6888 F 239-643-6871 2770 Horseshoe Drive S Suite 3 Naples, FL 34104  Experience Real Estate Analyst Julian has actively been engaged in real estate valuation and consulting since 2005. Territories include Collier, Lee, Charlotte, Sarasota, Manatee, Desoto and Hendry Counties. Experienced in valuations involving community/neighborhood shopping centers, power centers, office buildings - CBD and suburban, warehouse/distribution, multi-family, condomium projects, hotels and motels, vacant land and special purpose properties. Clients include, but are not limited to federally insured lenders, developers, investors, lasw firms, mortgage banking firms, local and federal agencies, and individuals. Valuations have been performed for estates, financing, equity participation and litigation support. Valuations have been done on proposed and existing structures. Professional Activities & Affiliations Appraisal Institute, Member (MAI) Appraisal Institue Licenses Florida, Real Estate Broker, Florida, State Certified General RE Appraiser, RZ#3537, Expires November 2020 Education University of North Florida - 2005 Bachelor of Science - Finances direction of Real Estate Uninversity of Denver - 2007 Masters of Science - Real Estate and Construction Management Successfully completed the registered trainee appraiser course requirementss accepted by the Appraisal Institute. Successfully completed numerous real estate and valuation courses and seminars sponsored by the Appraisal Institute, accredited universities and other state recognized schools. jlstokes@irr.com - 239-687-5802 x432 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 802 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 803 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict)   AboutIRR IntegraRealtyResources,Inc.(IRR)providesworldͲclasscommercialrealestatevaluation,counseling, andadvisoryservices.Routinelyrankedamongleadingpropertyvaluationandconsultingfirms,weare nowthelargestindependentfirminourindustryintheUnitedStates,withlocalofficescoasttocoast andintheCaribbean. IRRofficesareledbyMAIͲdesignatedSeniorManagingDirectors,industryleaderswhohaveover25 years,onaverage,ofcommercialrealestateexperienceintheirlocalmarkets.Thisexperience,coupled withourunderstandingofhownationaltrendsaffectthelocalmarkets,empowersourclientswiththe uniqueknowledge,access,andhistoricalperspectivetheyneedtomakethemostinformeddecisions. Manyofthenation'stopfinancialinstitutions,developers,corporations,lawfirms,andgovernment agenciesrelyonourprofessionalrealestateopinionstobestunderstandthevalue,use,andfeasibility ofrealestateintheirmarket. LocalExpertise...Nationally! irr.com  9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 804 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) Addenda ProposedCreeksideApartmentsSite AddendumB Definitions 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 805 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) Addenda ProposedCreeksideApartmentsSite Definitions ThesourceofthefollowingdefinitionsistheAppraisalInstitute,TheDictionaryofRealEstate Appraisal,6thed.(Chicago:AppraisalInstitute,2015),unlessotherwisenoted. Amenity Atangibleorintangiblebenefitofrealestatethatenhancesitsattractivenessorincreasesthe satisfactionoftheuser.Naturalamenitiesmayincludeapleasantlocationnearwaterorascenicview ofthesurroundingarea;manͲmadeamenitiesincludeswimmingpools,tenniscourts,community buildings,andotherrecreationalfacilities. AsIsMarketValue Theestimateofthemarketvalueofrealpropertyinitscurrentphysicalcondition,use,andzoningas oftheappraisaldate. ClassofApartmentProperty Forthepurposesofcomparison,apartmentpropertiesaregroupedintothreeclasses:ClassA,Band C.Theseclassesrepresentasubjectivequalityratingofbuildings,whichindicatesthecompetitive abilityofeachbuildingtoattractsimilartypesoftenants.Combinationsoffactorssuchasrent, buildingfinishes,systemstandardsandefficiency,buildingamenities,location/accessibility,and marketperceptionareusedasrelativemeasures. ClassAapartmentpropertiesarethemostprestigiouspropertiescompetingforthepremier apartmenttenants,withrentsaboveaverageforthearea.BuildingshavehighͲqualitystandard finishes,architecturalappeal,stateͲofͲtheͲartsystems,exceptionalaccessibility,andadefinitemarket presence. ClassBapartmentpropertiescompeteforawiderangeofusers,withrentsintheaveragerangefor thearea.ClassBbuildingsdonotcompetewithClassAbuildingsatthesameprice.Buildingfinishes arefairtogoodforthearea,andsystemsareadequate. ClassCapartmentpropertiescompetefortenantsrequiringfunctionalspaceatrentsbelowthe averageforthearea.ClassCbuildingsaregenerallyolder,andarelowerinqualityandcondition. (Source:IntegraRealtyResources) DeferredMaintenance ItemsofwearandtearonapropertythatshouldbefixednowtoprotectthevalueorincomeͲ producingabilityoftheproperty,suchasabrokenwindow,adeadtree,aleakintheroof,orafaulty roofthatmustbecompletelyreplaced.Theseitemsarealmostalwayscurable. Depreciation Alossinpropertyvaluefromanycause;thedifferencebetweenthecostofanimprovementonthe effectivedateoftheappraisalandthemarketvalueoftheimprovementonthesamedate. 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 806 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) Addenda ProposedCreeksideApartmentsSite DiscountedCashFlow(DCF)Analysis Theprocedureinwhichadiscountrateisappliedtoasetofprojectedincomestreamsanda reversion.Theanalystspecifiesthequantity,variability,timing,anddurationoftheincomestreams andthequantityandtimingofthereversion,anddiscountseachtoitspresentvalueataspecified yieldrate. DispositionValue Themostprobablepricethataspecifiedinterestinpropertyshouldbringunderthefollowing conditions: 1.Consummationofasalewithinaspecifiedtime,whichisshorterthanthetypicalexposure timeforsuchapropertyinthatmarket. 2.Thepropertyissubjectedtomarketconditionsprevailingasofthedateofvaluation. 3.Boththebuyerandsellerareactingprudentlyandknowledgeably. 4.Thesellerisundercompulsiontosell. 5.Thebuyeristypicallymotivated. 6.Bothpartiesareactinginwhattheyconsidertobetheirbestinterests. 7.Anadequatemarketingeffortwillbemadeduringtheexposuretime. 8.PaymentwillbemadeincashinU.S.dollars(orthelocalcurrency)orintermsoffinancial arrangementscomparablethereto. 9.Thepricerepresentsthenormalconsiderationforthepropertysold,unaffectedbyspecialor creativefinancingorsalesconcessionsgrantedbyanyoneassociatedwiththesale. Thisdefinitioncanalsobemodifiedtoprovideforvaluationwithspecifiedfinancingterms. EffectiveDate 1.Thedateonwhichtheappraisalorreviewopinionapplies. 2.Inaleasedocument,thedateuponwhichtheleasegoesintoeffect. EntrepreneurialIncentive Theamountanentrepreneurexpectstoreceiveforhisorhercontributiontoaproject. Entrepreneurialincentivemaybedistinguishedfromentrepreneurialprofit(oftencalleddeveloper’s profit)inthatitistheexpectationoffutureprofitasopposedtotheprofitactuallyearnedona developmentorimprovement.Theamountofentrepreneurialincentiverequiredforaproject representstheeconomicrewardsufficienttomotivateanentrepreneurtoaccepttheriskofthe projectandtoinvestthetimeandmoneynecessaryinseeingtheprojectthroughtocompletion. EntrepreneurialProfit 1.AmarketͲderivedfigurethatrepresentstheamountanentrepreneurreceivesforhisorher contributiontoaprojectandrisk;thedifferencebetweenthetotalcostofaproperty(costof development)anditsmarketvalue(propertyvalueaftercompletion),whichrepresentsthe entrepreneur’scompensationfortheriskandexpertiseassociatedwithdevelopment.An    9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 807 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) Addenda ProposedCreeksideApartmentsSite entrepreneurismotivatedbytheprospectoffuturevalueenhancement(i.e.,the entrepreneurialincentive).Anentrepreneurwhosuccessfullycreatesvaluethroughnew development,expansion,renovation,oraninnovativechangeofuseisrewardedby entrepreneurialprofit.Entrepreneursmayalsofailandsufferlosses. 2.Ineconomics,theactualreturnonsuccessfulmanagementpractices,oftenidentifiedwith coordination,thefourthfactorofproductionfollowingland,labor,andcapital;alsocalled entrepreneurialreturnorentrepreneurialreward. ExcessLand;SurplusLand ExcessLand:Landthatisnotneededtoserveorsupporttheexistingimprovement.Thehighestand bestuseoftheexcesslandmayormaynotbethesameasthehighestandbestuseoftheimproved parcel.Excesslandhasthepotentialtobesoldseparatelyandisvaluedseparately. SurplusLand:Landthatisnotcurrentlyneededtosupporttheexistingusebutcannotbeseparated fromthepropertyandsoldoffforanotheruse.Surpluslanddoesnothaveanindependenthighest andbestuseandmayormaynotcontributevaluetotheimprovedparcel. ExposureTime 1.Thetimeapropertyremainsonthemarket. 2.Theestimatedlengthoftimethatthepropertyinterestbeingappraisedwouldhavebeen offeredonthemarketpriortothehypotheticalconsummationofasaleatmarketvalueon theeffectivedateoftheappraisal;aretrospectiveopinionbasedonananalysisofpastevents assumingacompetitiveandopenmarket. FeeSimpleEstate Absoluteownershipunencumberedbyanyotherinterestorestate,subjectonlytothelimitations imposedbythegovernmentalpowersoftaxation,eminentdomain,policepower,andescheat. FloorAreaRatio(FAR) TherelationshipbetweentheaboveͲgroundfloorareaofabuilding,asdescribedbythezoningor buildingcode,andtheareaoftheplotonwhichitstands;inplanningandzoning,oftenexpressedasa decimal,e.g.,aratioof2.0indicatesthatthepermissiblefloorareaofabuildingistwicethetotalland area. GrossBuildingArea(GBA) Totalfloorareaofabuilding,excludingunenclosedareas,measuredfromtheexteriorofthewallsof theaboveͲgradearea.Thisincludesmezzaninesandbasementsifandwhentypicallyincludedinthe marketareaofthetypeofpropertyinvolved. HighestandBestUse 1.Thereasonablyprobableuseofpropertythatresultsinthehighestvalue.Thefourcriteria thatthehighestandbestusemustmeetarelegalpermissibility,physicalpossibility,financial feasibility,andmaximumproductivity.   9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 808 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) Addenda ProposedCreeksideApartmentsSite 2.Theuseofanassetthatmaximizesitspotentialandthatispossible,legallypermissible,and financiallyfeasible.Thehighestandbestusemaybeforcontinuationofanasset’sexistinguse orforsomealternativeuse.Thisisdeterminedbytheusethatamarketparticipantwould haveinmindfortheassetwhenformulatingthepricethatitwouldbewillingtobid.(ISV) 3.[The]highestandmostprofitableuseforwhichthepropertyisadaptableandneededorlikely tobeneededinthereasonablynearfuture.(UniformAppraisalStandardsforFederalLand Acquisitions) InvestmentValue 1.Thevalueofapropertytoaparticularinvestororclassofinvestorsbasedontheinvestor’s specificrequirements.Investmentvaluemaybedifferentfrommarketvaluebecauseit dependsonasetofinvestmentcriteriathatarenotnecessarilytypicalofthemarket. 2.Thevalueofanassettotheowneroraprospectiveownerforindividualinvestmentor operationalobjectives. Lease Acontractinwhichrightstouseandoccupyland,space,orstructuresaretransferredbytheownerto anotherforaspecifiedperiodoftimeinreturnforaspecifiedrent. LeasedFeeInterest Theownershipinterestheldbythelessor,whichincludestherighttoreceivethecontractrent specifiedintheleaseplusthereversionaryrightwhentheleaseexpires. LeaseholdInterest Therightheldbythelesseetouseandoccupyrealestateforastatedtermandundertheconditions specifiedinthelease. LiquidationValue Themostprobablepricethataspecifiedinterestinrealpropertyshouldbringunderthefollowing conditions: 1.Consummationofasalewithinashorttimeperiod. 2.Thepropertyissubjectedtomarketconditionsprevailingasofthedateofvaluation. 3.Boththebuyerandsellerareactingprudentlyandknowledgeably. 4.Thesellerisunderextremecompulsiontosell. 5.Thebuyeristypicallymotivated. 6.Bothpartiesareactinginwhattheyconsidertobetheirbestinterests. 7.Anormalmarketingeffortisnotpossibleduetothebriefexposuretime. 8.PaymentwillbemadeincashinU.S.dollars(orthelocalcurrency)orintermsoffinancial arrangementscomparablethereto. 9.Thepricerepresentsthenormalconsiderationforthepropertysold,unaffectedbyspecialor creativefinancingorsalesconcessionsgrantedbyanyoneassociatedwiththesale.   9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 809 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) Addenda ProposedCreeksideApartmentsSite Thisdefinitioncanalsobemodifiedtoprovideforvaluationwithspecifiedfinancingterms. MarketingTime Anopinionoftheamountoftimeitmighttaketosellarealorpersonalpropertyinterestatthe concludedmarketvaluelevelduringtheperiodimmediatelyaftertheeffectivedateofanappraisal. Marketingtimediffersfromexposuretime,whichisalwayspresumedtoprecedetheeffectivedateof anappraisal. MarketRent Themostprobablerentthatapropertyshouldbringinacompetitiveandopenmarketreflectingall conditionsandrestrictionsoftheleaseagreement,includingtherentaladjustmentandrevaluation, permitteduses,userestrictions,expenseobligations,term,concessions,renewalandpurchase options,andtenantimprovements. MarketValue Themostprobablepricewhichapropertyshouldbringinacompetitiveandopenmarketunderall conditionsrequisitetoafairsale,thebuyerandsellereachactingprudentlyandknowledgeably,and assumingthepriceisnotaffectedbyunduestimulus.Implicitinthisdefinitionistheconsummationof asaleasofaspecifieddateandthepassingoftitlefromsellertobuyerunderconditionswhereby: xbuyerandselleraretypicallymotivated; xbothpartiesarewellinformedorwelladvised,andactinginwhattheyconsidertheirown bestinterests; xareasonabletimeisallowedforexposureintheopenmarket; xpaymentismadeintermsofcashinU.S.dollarsorintermsoffinancialarrangements comparablethereto;and xthepricerepresentsthenormalconsiderationforthepropertysoldunaffectedbyspecialor creativefinancingorsalesconcessionsgrantedbyanyoneassociatedwiththesale. (Source:CodeofFederalRegulations,Title12,ChapterI,Part34.42[h];alsoInteragencyAppraisaland EvaluationGuidelines,FederalRegister,75FR77449,December10,2010,page77472) MultifamilyPropertyType Residentialstructurecontainingfiveormoredwellingunitswithcommonareasandfacilities.(Source: AppraisalInstituteCommercialDataStandardsandGlossaryofTerms,Chicago,Illinois,2004 [AppraisalInstitute]) MultifamilyClassifications Garden/LowRiseApartments:AmultifamilydevelopmentoftwoͲorthreeͲstory,walkͲupstructures builtinagardenͲlikesetting;customarilyasuburbanorruralͲurbanfringedevelopment.(Source: AppraisalInstitute) Mid/HighͲRiseApartmentBuilding:Amultifamilybuildingwithfourormorestories,typically elevatorͲserved.(Source:AppraisalInstitute) 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 810 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) Addenda ProposedCreeksideApartmentsSite ProspectiveOpinionofValue Avalueopinioneffectiveasofaspecifiedfuturedate.Thetermdoesnotdefineatypeofvalue. Instead,itidentifiesavalueopinionasbeingeffectiveatsomespecificfuturedate.Anopinionof valueasofaprospectivedateisfrequentlysoughtinconnectionwithprojectsthatareproposed, underconstruction,orunderconversiontoanewuse,orthosethathavenotyetachievedselloutora stabilizedleveloflongͲtermoccupancy. RentableFloorArea(RFA) Rentableareashallbecomputedbymeasuringinsidefinishofpermanentouterbuildingwallsorfrom theglasslinewhereatleast50%oftheouterbuildingwallisglass.Rentableareashallalsoincludeall areawithinoutsidewallslessstairs,elevatorshafts,flues,pipeshafts,verticalducts,airconditioning rooms,fanrooms,janitorclosets,electricalclosets,balconiesandsuchotherroomsnotactually availabletothetenantforhisfurnishingsandpersonnelandtheirenclosingwalls.Nodeductionsshall bemadeforcolumnsandprojectionsunnecessarytothebuilding.(Source:Income/ExpenseAnalysis, 2016Edition–ConventionalApartments,InstituteofRealEstateManagement,Chicago,Illinois) ReplacementCost Theestimatedcosttoconstruct,atcurrentpricesasofaspecificdate,asubstituteforabuildingor otherimprovements,usingmodernmaterialsandcurrentstandards,designandlayout. ReproductionCost Theestimatedcosttoconstruct,atcurrentpricesasoftheeffectivedateoftheappraisal,anexact duplicateorreplicaofthebuildingbeingappraised,usingthesamematerials,constructionstandards, design,layout,andqualityofworkmanshipandembodyingallthedeficiencies,superadequacies,and obsolescenceofthesubjectbuilding. RoomCount Aunitofcomparisonusedprimarilyinresidentialappraisal.Nonationalstandardexistsonwhat constitutesaroom.Thegenerallyacceptedmethodistoconsiderasseparateroomsonlythoserooms thatareeffectivelydividedandtoexcludebathrooms. StabilizedIncome 1.Anestimateofincome,eithercurrentorforecasted,thatpresumesthepropertyisat stabilizedoccupancy. 2.Theforecastofthesubjectproperty’syearlyaverageincome(oraverageͲequivalentincome) expectedfortheeconomiclifeofthesubjectproperty. 3.Projectedincomethatissubjecttochangebuthasbeenadjustedtoreflectanequivalent, stableannualincome. StabilizedOccupancy 1.Theoccupancyofapropertythatwouldbeexpectedataparticularpointintime,considering itsrelativecompetitivestrengthandsupplyanddemandconditionsatthetime,and presumingitispricedatmarketrentandhashadreasonablemarketexposure.Apropertyis atstabilizedoccupancywhenitiscapturingitsappropriateshareofmarketdemand.   9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 811 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) Addenda ProposedCreeksideApartmentsSite 2.Anexpressionoftheaverageortypicaloccupancythatwouldbeexpectedforapropertyover aspecifiedprojectionperiodoroveritseconomiclife. 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 812 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) Addenda ProposedCreeksideApartmentsSite AddendumC FinancialsandPropertyInformation 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 813 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict)  &ROOLHU&RXQW\3URSHUW\$SSUDLVHU3URSHUW\$HULDO 3DUFHO1R 6LWH$GGUHVV 'LVFODLPHU 6LWH&LW\1$3/(6 6LWH=RQH 1RWH  2SHQ*,6LQD1HZ:LQGRZZLWK0RUH)HDWXUHV 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 814 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) Pay in U.S. Funds Drawn on a U.S. Bank To: Collier County Tax Collector 3291 E. Tamiami Trail Naples, FL 34112-5758 POST DATED CHECKS ARE NOT ACCEPTED AND WILL BE RETURNED Visit our website: www.colliertaxFROOHFWRU.com Legal Description Combined Ad Valorem and Non-Ad Valorem TotalSee reverse side for important information $VVHVVHGValue 'LVWULFW Mill Rate Assessed Value Exempt Amt Taxable Value  Tax Amount Parcel Number Legal Description Mill Code Escrow Code Please Retain this portion for your records ExemptionV Millage Total Total Ad Valorem Non-Ad Valorem District Type of Assessment Amount Non-Ad Valorem Total (Detach and Return with your Payment) Parcel Number Mill Code Escrow Code Larry H. Ray CREEKSIDE EAST INC 2600 GOLDEN GATE PKWY NAPLES, FL 34105 CREEKSIDE EAST INC 2600 GOLDEN GATE PKWY NAPLES, FL 34105 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100100 $1.08 GENERAL FUND WATER MANAGEMENT FUND-SOUTH 100 BIG CYPRESS BASIN 100 SCHOOL BOARD - STATE LAW 100 SCHOOL BOARD - LOCAL BOARD 100 COLLIER MOSQUITO CONTROL 100 NNF/NORTH COLLIER FIRE CONTROL 100 UNINCORP GEN - MSTD 100 C.C. WATER POLLUTION CTRL PGM 0.0293 1000.8069 100 1.0000 0.1720 2.2480 2.8350 0.1192 0.1152 3.5645 $0.00 Pay your current taxes online at: http://www.colliertaxcollector.com/ 133 133 $1.0810.8901 29331181129 29331181129 CREEKSIDE COMMERCE PARK EAST TRACT P-1 CREEKSIDE COMMERCE PARK EAST TRACT P-1 0 0 0 If Paid By If Paid By 0 Sep 30, 2020 Sep 30, 2020 0 0 0 0 0.36 0 0.01 2019 Paid Collier County Notice of Ad Valorem Taxes and Non-Ad Valorem Assessments 2019 Paid Collier County Notice of Ad Valorem Taxes and Non-Ad Valorem Assessments Please Pay Please Pay 0.01 $0.00 $0.00 0.28 0.22 0.02 0.10 0.08 0.00 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 815 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) Office Hours Office Hours Main Office 8:00 am 5:00 pm (239) 252-8172 Immokalee Courthouse Annex 8:00 am 5:00 pm (239) 657-2054 Naples City Hall 9:00 am 5:00 pm (239) 434-5687 Marco Island 1040 Winterberry Dr. 8:00 am 5:00 pm (239) 394-6986 Eagle Creek Freedom Square 9:00 am 6:00 pm (239) 417-3036 Orange Blossom 2335 Orange 9:00 am 6:00 pm (239) 252-8172 Everglades City Courthouse 8:00 am 5:00 pm (239) 695-2511 Blossom Dr Golden Gate Center 9:00 am 6:00 pm (239) 455-2858 Wilson Blvd 50 S. Wilson Blvd. 9:00 am 6:00 pm (239) 348-1011 Green Tree Shopping Center 9:00 am 6:00 pm (239) 598-2525 RECEIPTS AVAILABLE ONLINE (www.colliertax.com) OR ON A WALK-IN BASIS AT ANY COLLIER COUNTY TAX COLLECTOR LOCATION. ,I you have sold any of the REAL ESTATE property assessed to you, PLEASE 5(7851 THIS NOTICE to the7$;&2//(&725 Please mail or bring bottom portion of this Notice with your remittance. Taxes and Non-Ad Valorem Assessments are due November 1, discounts have been computed as follows: 4% if paid in November 3% if paid in December 2% if paid in January 1% if paid in February Taxes and Non-Ad Valorem Assessments become delinquent April 1, at which time the law imposes: REAL ESTATE & NON-AD VALOREM A maximum of 18% per year plus other cost and fees. Tax Certificates will be sold pursuant to Florida Statutes. TANGIBLE PERSONAL PROPERTY 1 ½ % per month plus advertising and fees. Warrants will be issued pursuant to Florida Statutes. TAX COLLECTOR Responsible for preparation and mailing of tax notices based on information contained on the current tax roll certified by the Property Appraiser and Non-Ad Valorem assessments provided by the levying authorities. (239) 252-8172 PROPERTY APPRAISER- Responsible for preparation of the current Ad Valorem Tax Roll, Assessed Value, Exemptions, Taxable Value, Assessed Owners(s), name and mailing address and legal description of the property. (239) 252-8141 See insert for telephone numbers of the authorities responsible for Ad Valorem and Non-Ad Valorem rates. Before April 1st, discounts are determined by postmark. As of April 1 st, penalties are determined by date received. All payments made on or after April 1 st must be in the form of cash, cashieU·s check or money order. You may make payment of your notice of taxes and assessments at the following offices Monday thru Friday. 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 816 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict)  &ROOLHU&RXQW\3URSHUW\$SSUDLVHU3URSHUW\'HWDLO 3DUFHO1R 6LWH$GGUHVV 'LVFODLPHU 6LWH&LW\1$3/(6 6LWH=RQH 1RWH  1DPH$GGUHVV &5((.6,'(($67,1& *2/'(1*$7(3.:< &LW\1$3/(6 6WDWH )/=LS  3HUPLWV 3URYLGHGIRUUHIHUHQFHSXUSRVHVRQO\ )XOO'LVFODLPHU 7D[<U ,VVXHU 3HUPLW &2'DWH 7PS&2 )LQDO%OGJ 7\SH /DQG £ &DOF&RGH 8QLWV  $&5($*(  £%XLOGLQJ([WUD)HDWXUHV £<HDU%XLOW 'HVFULSWLRQ $UHD $GM$UHD 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 817 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict)        &ROOLHU&RXQW\3URSHUW\$SSUDLVHU3URSHUW\6XPPDU\ 3DUFHO1R 6LWH$GGUHVV 'LVFODLPHU 6LWH&LW\1$3/(6 6LWH=RQH 1RWH  1DPH$GGUHVV&5((.6,'(($67,1& *2/'(1*$7(3.:< &LW\1$3/(6 6WDWH )/=LS  0DS1R 6WUDS1R 6HFWLRQ 7RZQVKLS 5DQJH $FUHV£ (VWLPDWHG $ 3$     /HJDO &5((.6,'(&200(5&(3$5.($6775$&73 0LOODJH$UHD0LOODJH5DWHV£ &DOFXODWLRQV 6XE&RQGR &5((.6,'(&200(5&(3$5.($67 6FKRRO 2WKHU 7RWDO 8VH&RGH6(:$*(',6326$/62/,':$67%2552:3,76   /DWHVW6DOHV+LVWRU\ 1RWDOO6DOHVDUHOLVWHGGXHWR&RQILGHQWLDOLW\ 'DWH %RRN3DJH $PRXQW £3UHOLPLQDU\7D[5ROO 6XEMHFWWR&KDQJH /DQG9DOXH ſʫƀ,PSURYHG9DOXH ſʰƀ0DUNHW9DOXH ſʰƀ$VVHVVHG9DOXH ſʰƀ6FKRRO7D[DEOH9DOXH ſʰƀ7D[DEOH9DOXH ,IDOO9DOXHVVKRZQDERYHHTXDOWKLVSDUFHOZDVFUHDWHGDIWHUWKH)LQDO7D[5ROO £ 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 818 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict)  &ROOLHU&RXQW\3URSHUW\$SSUDLVHU3URSHUW\$HULDO 3DUFHO1R 6LWH$GGUHVV 'LVFODLPHU 6LWH&LW\1$3/(6 6LWH=RQH 1RWH  2SHQ*,6LQD1HZ:LQGRZZLWK0RUH)HDWXUHV 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 819 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) Pay in U.S. Funds Drawn on a U.S. Bank To: Collier County Tax Collector 3291 E. Tamiami Trail Naples, FL 34112-5758 POST DATED CHECKS ARE NOT ACCEPTED AND WILL BE RETURNED Visit our website: www.colliertaxFROOHFWRU.com Legal Description Combined Ad Valorem and Non-Ad Valorem TotalSee reverse side for important information $VVHVVHGValue 'LVWULFW Mill Rate Assessed Value Exempt Amt Taxable Value  Tax Amount Parcel Number Legal Description Mill Code Escrow Code Please Retain this portion for your records ExemptionV Millage Total Total Ad Valorem Non-Ad Valorem District Type of Assessment Amount Non-Ad Valorem Total (Detach and Return with your Payment) Parcel Number Mill Code Escrow Code Larry H. Ray CREEKSIDE EAST INC % BARRON COLLIER COMPANIES 2600 GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY NAPLES, FL 34105 CREEKSIDE EAST INC % BARRON COLLIER COMPANIES 2600 GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY NAPLES, FL 34105 1,756,389 1,756,389 1,756,389 1,756,389 1,999,395 1,999,395 1,756,389 1,756,389 1,756,3891,756,389 $20,362.45 GENERAL FUND WATER MANAGEMENT FUND-SOUTH 1,756,389 BIG CYPRESS BASIN 1,756,389 SCHOOL BOARD - STATE LAW 1,756,389 SCHOOL BOARD - LOCAL BOARD 1,999,395 COLLIER MOSQUITO CONTROL 1,999,395 NNF/NORTH COLLIER FIRE CONTROL 1,756,389 UNINCORP GEN - MSTD 1,756,389 C.C. WATER POLLUTION CTRL PGM 0.0293 1,756,3890.8069 1,756,389 1.0000 0.1720 2.2480 2.8350 0.1192 0.1152 3.5645 $0.00 Pay your current taxes online at: http://www.colliertaxcollector.com/ 133 133 $20,362.4510.8901 Paid By Receipt # 29333000046 29333000046 CREEKSIDE EAST INC, DBA CREEKSIDE CORNERS CREEKSIDE EAST LAND CONDOMINIUM UNIT 2 CREEKSIDE EAST LAND CONDOMINIUM UNIT 2 TAX HSP 1-20-00280835 19547.95 0 0 0 11/25/2019 If Paid By If Paid By 0 Nov 30, 2019 Nov 30, 2019 0 0 0 0 6,260.65 0 202.34 2019 Paid Collier County Notice of Ad Valorem Taxes and Non-Ad Valorem Assessments 2019 Paid Collier County Notice of Ad Valorem Taxes and Non-Ad Valorem Assessments Please Pay Please Pay 209.36 $0.00 $0.00 5,668.28 4,494.64 302.10 1,756.39 1,417.23 51.46 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 820 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) Office Hours Office Hours Main Office 8:00 am 5:00 pm (239) 252-8172 Immokalee Courthouse Annex 8:00 am 5:00 pm (239) 657-2054 Naples City Hall 9:00 am 5:00 pm (239) 434-5687 Marco Island 1040 Winterberry Dr. 8:00 am 5:00 pm (239) 394-6986 Eagle Creek Freedom Square 9:00 am 6:00 pm (239) 417-3036 Orange Blossom 2335 Orange 9:00 am 6:00 pm (239) 252-8172 Everglades City Courthouse 8:00 am 5:00 pm (239) 695-2511 Blossom Dr Golden Gate Center 9:00 am 6:00 pm (239) 455-2858 Wilson Blvd 50 S. Wilson Blvd. 9:00 am 6:00 pm (239) 348-1011 Green Tree Shopping Center 9:00 am 6:00 pm (239) 598-2525 RECEIPTS AVAILABLE ONLINE (www.colliertax.com) OR ON A WALK-IN BASIS AT ANY COLLIER COUNTY TAX COLLECTOR LOCATION. ,I you have sold any of the REAL ESTATE property assessed to you, PLEASE 5(7851 THIS NOTICE to the7$;&2//(&725 Please mail or bring bottom portion of this Notice with your remittance. Taxes and Non-Ad Valorem Assessments are due November 1, discounts have been computed as follows: 4% if paid in November 3% if paid in December 2% if paid in January 1% if paid in February Taxes and Non-Ad Valorem Assessments become delinquent April 1, at which time the law imposes: REAL ESTATE & NON-AD VALOREM A maximum of 18% per year plus other cost and fees. Tax Certificates will be sold pursuant to Florida Statutes. TANGIBLE PERSONAL PROPERTY 1 ½ % per month plus advertising and fees. Warrants will be issued pursuant to Florida Statutes. TAX COLLECTOR Responsible for preparation and mailing of tax notices based on information contained on the current tax roll certified by the Property Appraiser and Non-Ad Valorem assessments provided by the levying authorities. (239) 252-8172 PROPERTY APPRAISER- Responsible for preparation of the current Ad Valorem Tax Roll, Assessed Value, Exemptions, Taxable Value, Assessed Owners(s), name and mailing address and legal description of the property. (239) 252-8141 See insert for telephone numbers of the authorities responsible for Ad Valorem and Non-Ad Valorem rates. Before April 1st, discounts are determined by postmark. As of April 1 st, penalties are determined by date received. All payments made on or after April 1 st must be in the form of cash, cashieU·s check or money order. You may make payment of your notice of taxes and assessments at the following offices Monday thru Friday. 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 821 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict)  &ROOLHU&RXQW\3URSHUW\$SSUDLVHU3URSHUW\'HWDLO 3DUFHO1R 6LWH$GGUHVV 'LVFODLPHU 6LWH&LW\1$3/(6 6LWH=RQH 1RWH  1DPH$GGUHVV &5((.6,'(($67,1& %$5521&2//,(5&203$1,(6 *2/'(1*$7(3$5.:$< &LW\1$3/(6 6WDWH )/=LS  3HUPLWV 3URYLGHGIRUUHIHUHQFHSXUSRVHVRQO\ )XOO'LVFODLPHU 7D[<U ,VVXHU 3HUPLW &2'DWH 7PS&2 )LQDO%OGJ 7\SH /DQG £ &DOF&RGH 8QLWV  38'81,76%8,/'$%/(  £%XLOGLQJ([WUD)HDWXUHV £<HDU%XLOW 'HVFULSWLRQ $UHD $GM$UHD 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 822 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict)         &ROOLHU&RXQW\3URSHUW\$SSUDLVHU3URSHUW\6XPPDU\ 3DUFHO1R 6LWH$GGUHVV 'LVFODLPHU 6LWH&LW\1$3/(6 6LWH=RQH 1RWH  1DPH$GGUHVV&5((.6,'(($67,1& %$5521&2//,(5&203$1,(6 *2/'(1*$7(3$5.:$< &LW\1$3/(6 6WDWH )/=LS  0DS1R 6WUDS1R 6HFWLRQ 7RZQVKLS 5DQJH $FUHV£ (VWLPDWHG $ $     /HJDO &5((.6,'(($67/$1'&21'20,1,8081,7 0LOODJH$UHD0LOODJH5DWHV£ &DOFXODWLRQV 6XE&RQGR &5((.6,'(($67/$1'&21'20,1,80 6FKRRO 2WKHU 7RWDO 8VH&RGH&200(5&,$/  /DWHVW6DOHV+LVWRU\ 1RWDOO6DOHVDUHOLVWHGGXHWR&RQILGHQWLDOLW\ 'DWH %RRN3DJH $PRXQW £3UHOLPLQDU\7D[5ROO 6XEMHFWWR&KDQJH /DQG9DOXH ſʫƀ,PSURYHG9DOXH ſʰƀ0DUNHW9DOXH ſŞƀ&DS ſʰƀ$VVHVVHG9DOXH ſʰƀ6FKRRO7D[DEOH9DOXH ſʰƀ7D[DEOH9DOXH ,IDOO9DOXHVVKRZQDERYHHTXDOWKLVSDUFHOZDVFUHDWHGDIWHUWKH)LQDO7D[5ROO 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 823 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict)  &ROOLHU&RXQW\3URSHUW\$SSUDLVHU3URSHUW\$HULDO 3DUFHO1R 6LWH$GGUHVV 'LVFODLPHU ,002.$/((5'6LWH&LW\1$3/(6 6LWH=RQH 1RWH  2SHQ*,6LQD1HZ:LQGRZZLWK0RUH)HDWXUHV 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 824 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) Pay in U.S. Funds Drawn on a U.S. Bank To: Collier County Tax Collector 3291 E. Tamiami Trail Naples, FL 34112-5758 POST DATED CHECKS ARE NOT ACCEPTED AND WILL BE RETURNED Visit our website: www.colliertaxFROOHFWRU.com Legal Description Combined Ad Valorem and Non-Ad Valorem TotalSee reverse side for important information $VVHVVHGValue 'LVWULFW Mill Rate Assessed Value Exempt Amt Taxable Value  Tax Amount Parcel Number Legal Description Mill Code Escrow Code Please Retain this portion for your records ExemptionV Millage Total Total Ad Valorem Non-Ad Valorem District Type of Assessment Amount Non-Ad Valorem Total (Detach and Return with your Payment) Parcel Number Mill Code Escrow Code Larry H. Ray CREEKSIDE EAST INC 2600 GOLDEN GATE PKWY NAPLES, FL 34105 CREEKSIDE EAST INC 2600 GOLDEN GATE PKWY NAPLES, FL 34105 2,747,414 2,747,414 2,747,414 2,747,414 2,747,414 2,747,414 2,747,414 2,747,414 2,747,4142,747,414 $29,919.62 GENERAL FUND WATER MANAGEMENT FUND-SOUTH 2,747,414 BIG CYPRESS BASIN 2,747,414 SCHOOL BOARD - STATE LAW 2,747,414 SCHOOL BOARD - LOCAL BOARD 2,747,414 COLLIER MOSQUITO CONTROL 2,747,414 NNF/NORTH COLLIER FIRE CONTROL 2,747,414 UNINCORP GEN - MSTD 2,747,414 C.C. WATER POLLUTION CTRL PGM 0.0293 2,747,4140.8069 2,747,414 1.0000 0.1720 2.2480 2.8350 0.1192 0.1152 3.5645 $0.00 Pay your current taxes online at: http://www.colliertaxcollector.com/ 133 133 $29,919.6210.8901 Paid By Receipt # 23991198024 23991198024 CREEKSIDE EAST INC, DBA CREEKSIDE CORNERS CREEKSIDE CORNERS CONDOMINIUM A COMMERCIAL LAND CONDOMINIUM UNIT 1 CREEKSIDE CORNERS CONDOMINIUM A COMMERCIAL LAND CONDOMINIUM UNIT 1 TAX HSP 1-20-00280835 28722.84 0 0 0 11/25/2019 If Paid By If Paid By 0 Nov 30, 2019 Nov 30, 2019 0 0 0 0 9,793.16 0 316.50 2019 Paid Collier County Notice of Ad Valorem Taxes and Non-Ad Valorem Assessments 2019 Paid Collier County Notice of Ad Valorem Taxes and Non-Ad Valorem Assessments Please Pay Please Pay 327.49 $0.00 $0.00 7,788.92 6,176.19 472.56 2,747.41 2,216.89 80.50 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 825 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) Office Hours Office Hours Main Office 8:00 am 5:00 pm (239) 252-8172 Immokalee Courthouse Annex 8:00 am 5:00 pm (239) 657-2054 Naples City Hall 9:00 am 5:00 pm (239) 434-5687 Marco Island 1040 Winterberry Dr. 8:00 am 5:00 pm (239) 394-6986 Eagle Creek Freedom Square 9:00 am 6:00 pm (239) 417-3036 Orange Blossom 2335 Orange 9:00 am 6:00 pm (239) 252-8172 Everglades City Courthouse 8:00 am 5:00 pm (239) 695-2511 Blossom Dr Golden Gate Center 9:00 am 6:00 pm (239) 455-2858 Wilson Blvd 50 S. Wilson Blvd. 9:00 am 6:00 pm (239) 348-1011 Green Tree Shopping Center 9:00 am 6:00 pm (239) 598-2525 RECEIPTS AVAILABLE ONLINE (www.colliertax.com) OR ON A WALK-IN BASIS AT ANY COLLIER COUNTY TAX COLLECTOR LOCATION. ,I you have sold any of the REAL ESTATE property assessed to you, PLEASE 5(7851 THIS NOTICE to the7$;&2//(&725 Please mail or bring bottom portion of this Notice with your remittance. Taxes and Non-Ad Valorem Assessments are due November 1, discounts have been computed as follows: 4% if paid in November 3% if paid in December 2% if paid in January 1% if paid in February Taxes and Non-Ad Valorem Assessments become delinquent April 1, at which time the law imposes: REAL ESTATE & NON-AD VALOREM A maximum of 18% per year plus other cost and fees. Tax Certificates will be sold pursuant to Florida Statutes. TANGIBLE PERSONAL PROPERTY 1 ½ % per month plus advertising and fees. Warrants will be issued pursuant to Florida Statutes. TAX COLLECTOR Responsible for preparation and mailing of tax notices based on information contained on the current tax roll certified by the Property Appraiser and Non-Ad Valorem assessments provided by the levying authorities. (239) 252-8172 PROPERTY APPRAISER- Responsible for preparation of the current Ad Valorem Tax Roll, Assessed Value, Exemptions, Taxable Value, Assessed Owners(s), name and mailing address and legal description of the property. (239) 252-8141 See insert for telephone numbers of the authorities responsible for Ad Valorem and Non-Ad Valorem rates. Before April 1st, discounts are determined by postmark. As of April 1 st, penalties are determined by date received. All payments made on or after April 1 st must be in the form of cash, cashieU·s check or money order. You may make payment of your notice of taxes and assessments at the following offices Monday thru Friday. 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 826 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict)  &ROOLHU&RXQW\3URSHUW\$SSUDLVHU3URSHUW\'HWDLO 3DUFHO1R 6LWH$GGUHVV 'LVFODLPHU ,002.$/((5'6LWH&LW\1$3/(6 6LWH=RQH 1RWH  1DPH$GGUHVV &5((.6,'(($67,1& *2/'(1*$7(3.:< &LW\1$3/(6 6WDWH )/=LS  3HUPLWV 3URYLGHGIRUUHIHUHQFHSXUSRVHVRQO\ )XOO'LVFODLPHU 7D[<U ,VVXHU 3HUPLW &2'DWH 7PS&2 )LQDO%OGJ 7\SH  &2817< 35%'   &2817< 35%'   &2817< 35%'   &2817< 35%'   &2817< 35%'   &2817< 35%'   &2817< 35%'   &2817< 35%'   &2817< 35%'   &2817< 35%'   &2817< 35%'  &2817< 35%'   /DQG £ &DOF&RGH 8QLWV  38'81,76%8,/'$%/(  £%XLOGLQJ([WUD)HDWXUHV £<HDU%XLOW 'HVFULSWLRQ $UHD $GM$UHD 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 827 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict)        &ROOLHU&RXQW\3URSHUW\$SSUDLVHU3URSHUW\6XPPDU\ 3DUFHO1R 6LWH$GGUHVV 'LVFODLPHU ,002.$/((5'6LWH&LW\1$3/(6 6LWH=RQH 1RWH  1DPH$GGUHVV&5((.6,'(($67,1& *2/'(1*$7(3.:< &LW\1$3/(6 6WDWH )/=LS  0DS1R 6WUDS1R 6HFWLRQ 7RZQVKLS 5DQJH $FUHV£ (VWLPDWHG $ $     /HJDO &5((.6,'(&251(56&21'20,1,80$&200(5&,$//$1'&21'20,1,8081,7 0LOODJH$UHD0LOODJH5DWHV£ &DOFXODWLRQV 6XE&RQGR &5((.6,'(&251(56&21'20,1,80$&200(5&,$//$1'&21'20,1,80 6FKRRO 2WKHU 7RWDO 8VH&RGH&200(5&,$/  /DWHVW6DOHV+LVWRU\ 1RWDOO6DOHVDUHOLVWHGGXHWR&RQILGHQWLDOLW\ 'DWH %RRN3DJH $PRXQW £3UHOLPLQDU\7D[5ROO 6XEMHFWWR&KDQJH /DQG9DOXH ſʫƀ,PSURYHG9DOXH ſʰƀ0DUNHW9DOXH ſʰƀ$VVHVVHG9DOXH ſʰƀ6FKRRO7D[DEOH9DOXH ſʰƀ7D[DEOH9DOXH ,IDOO9DOXHVVKRZQDERYHHTXDOWKLVSDUFHOZDVFUHDWHGDIWHUWKH)LQDO7D[5ROO £ 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 828 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict)  &ROOLHU&RXQW\3URSHUW\$SSUDLVHU3URSHUW\$HULDO 3DUFHO1R 6LWH$GGUHVV 'LVFODLPHU &5((.6,'(%/9'(6LWH&LW\1$3/(6 6LWH=RQH 1RWH  2SHQ*,6LQD1HZ:LQGRZZLWK0RUH)HDWXUHV 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 829 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) Pay in U.S. Funds Drawn on a U.S. Bank To: Collier County Tax Collector 3291 E. Tamiami Trail Naples, FL 34112-5758 POST DATED CHECKS ARE NOT ACCEPTED AND WILL BE RETURNED Visit our website: www.colliertaxFROOHFWRU.com Legal Description Combined Ad Valorem and Non-Ad Valorem TotalSee reverse side for important information $VVHVVHGValue 'LVWULFW Mill Rate Assessed Value Exempt Amt Taxable Value  Tax Amount Parcel Number Legal Description Mill Code Escrow Code Please Retain this portion for your records ExemptionV Millage Total Total Ad Valorem Non-Ad Valorem District Type of Assessment Amount Non-Ad Valorem Total (Detach and Return with your Payment) Parcel Number Mill Code Escrow Code Larry H. Ray CREEKSIDE EAST INC 2600 GOLDEN GATE PKWY NAPLES, FL 34105 CREEKSIDE EAST INC 2600 GOLDEN GATE PKWY NAPLES, FL 34105 1,545,420 1,545,420 1,545,420 1,545,420 1,545,420 1,545,420 1,545,420 1,545,420 1,545,4201,545,420 $16,829.77 GENERAL FUND WATER MANAGEMENT FUND-SOUTH 1,545,420 BIG CYPRESS BASIN 1,545,420 SCHOOL BOARD - STATE LAW 1,545,420 SCHOOL BOARD - LOCAL BOARD 1,545,420 COLLIER MOSQUITO CONTROL 1,545,420 NNF/NORTH COLLIER FIRE CONTROL 1,545,420 UNINCORP GEN - MSTD 1,545,420 C.C. WATER POLLUTION CTRL PGM 0.0293 1,545,4200.8069 1,545,420 1.0000 0.1720 2.2480 2.8350 0.1192 0.1152 3.5645 $0.00 Pay your current taxes online at: http://www.colliertaxcollector.com/ 133 133 $16,829.7710.8901 Paid By Receipt # 23991198040 23991198040 CREEKSIDE EAST INC, DBA CREEKSIDE CORNERS CREEKSIDE CORNERS CONDOMINIUM A COMMERCIAL LAND CONDOMINIUM UNIT 2 CREEKSIDE CORNERS CONDOMINIUM A COMMERCIAL LAND CONDOMINIUM UNIT 2 TAX HSP 1-20-00280835 16156.58 0 0 0 11/25/2019 If Paid By If Paid By 0 Nov 30, 2019 Nov 30, 2019 0 0 0 0 5,508.65 0 178.03 2019 Paid Collier County Notice of Ad Valorem Taxes and Non-Ad Valorem Assessments 2019 Paid Collier County Notice of Ad Valorem Taxes and Non-Ad Valorem Assessments Please Pay Please Pay 184.21 $0.00 $0.00 4,381.27 3,474.10 265.81 1,545.42 1,247.00 45.28 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 830 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) Office Hours Office Hours Main Office 8:00 am 5:00 pm (239) 252-8172 Immokalee Courthouse Annex 8:00 am 5:00 pm (239) 657-2054 Naples City Hall 9:00 am 5:00 pm (239) 434-5687 Marco Island 1040 Winterberry Dr. 8:00 am 5:00 pm (239) 394-6986 Eagle Creek Freedom Square 9:00 am 6:00 pm (239) 417-3036 Orange Blossom 2335 Orange 9:00 am 6:00 pm (239) 252-8172 Everglades City Courthouse 8:00 am 5:00 pm (239) 695-2511 Blossom Dr Golden Gate Center 9:00 am 6:00 pm (239) 455-2858 Wilson Blvd 50 S. Wilson Blvd. 9:00 am 6:00 pm (239) 348-1011 Green Tree Shopping Center 9:00 am 6:00 pm (239) 598-2525 RECEIPTS AVAILABLE ONLINE (www.colliertax.com) OR ON A WALK-IN BASIS AT ANY COLLIER COUNTY TAX COLLECTOR LOCATION. ,I you have sold any of the REAL ESTATE property assessed to you, PLEASE 5(7851 THIS NOTICE to the7$;&2//(&725 Please mail or bring bottom portion of this Notice with your remittance. Taxes and Non-Ad Valorem Assessments are due November 1, discounts have been computed as follows: 4% if paid in November 3% if paid in December 2% if paid in January 1% if paid in February Taxes and Non-Ad Valorem Assessments become delinquent April 1, at which time the law imposes: REAL ESTATE & NON-AD VALOREM A maximum of 18% per year plus other cost and fees. Tax Certificates will be sold pursuant to Florida Statutes. TANGIBLE PERSONAL PROPERTY 1 ½ % per month plus advertising and fees. Warrants will be issued pursuant to Florida Statutes. TAX COLLECTOR Responsible for preparation and mailing of tax notices based on information contained on the current tax roll certified by the Property Appraiser and Non-Ad Valorem assessments provided by the levying authorities. (239) 252-8172 PROPERTY APPRAISER- Responsible for preparation of the current Ad Valorem Tax Roll, Assessed Value, Exemptions, Taxable Value, Assessed Owners(s), name and mailing address and legal description of the property. (239) 252-8141 See insert for telephone numbers of the authorities responsible for Ad Valorem and Non-Ad Valorem rates. Before April 1st, discounts are determined by postmark. As of April 1 st, penalties are determined by date received. All payments made on or after April 1 st must be in the form of cash, cashieU·s check or money order. You may make payment of your notice of taxes and assessments at the following offices Monday thru Friday. 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 831 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict)  &ROOLHU&RXQW\3URSHUW\$SSUDLVHU3URSHUW\'HWDLO 3DUFHO1R 6LWH$GGUHVV 'LVFODLPHU &5((.6,'(%/9'(6LWH&LW\1$3/(6 6LWH=RQH 1RWH  1DPH$GGUHVV &5((.6,'(($67,1& *2/'(1*$7(3.:< &LW\1$3/(6 6WDWH )/=LS  3HUPLWV 3URYLGHGIRUUHIHUHQFHSXUSRVHVRQO\ )XOO'LVFODLPHU 7D[<U ,VVXHU 3HUPLW &2'DWH 7PS&2 )LQDO%OGJ 7\SH /DQG £ &DOF&RGH 8QLWV  38'81,76%8,/'$%/(  £%XLOGLQJ([WUD)HDWXUHV £<HDU%XLOW 'HVFULSWLRQ $UHD $GM$UHD 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 832 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict)        &ROOLHU&RXQW\3URSHUW\$SSUDLVHU3URSHUW\6XPPDU\ 3DUFHO1R 6LWH$GGUHVV 'LVFODLPHU &5((.6,'(%/9'(6LWH&LW\1$3/(6 6LWH=RQH 1RWH  1DPH$GGUHVV&5((.6,'(($67,1& *2/'(1*$7(3.:< &LW\1$3/(6 6WDWH )/=LS  0DS1R 6WUDS1R 6HFWLRQ 7RZQVKLS 5DQJH $FUHV£ (VWLPDWHG $ $     /HJDO &5((.6,'(&251(56&21'20,1,80$&200(5&,$//$1'&21'20,1,8081,7 0LOODJH$UHD0LOODJH5DWHV£ &DOFXODWLRQV 6XE&RQGR &5((.6,'(&251(56&21'20,1,80$&200(5&,$//$1'&21'20,1,80 6FKRRO 2WKHU 7RWDO 8VH&RGH&200(5&,$/  /DWHVW6DOHV+LVWRU\ 1RWDOO6DOHVDUHOLVWHGGXHWR&RQILGHQWLDOLW\ 'DWH %RRN3DJH $PRXQW £3UHOLPLQDU\7D[5ROO 6XEMHFWWR&KDQJH /DQG9DOXH ſʫƀ,PSURYHG9DOXH ſʰƀ0DUNHW9DOXH ſʰƀ$VVHVVHG9DOXH ſʰƀ6FKRRO7D[DEOH9DOXH ſʰƀ7D[DEOH9DOXH ,IDOO9DOXHVVKRZQDERYHHTXDOWKLVSDUFHOZDVFUHDWHGDIWHUWKH)LQDO7D[5ROO £ 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 833 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict)  &ROOLHU&RXQW\3URSHUW\$SSUDLVHU3URSHUW\$HULDO 3DUFHO1R 6LWH$GGUHVV 'LVFODLPHU 6LWH&LW\1$3/(6 6LWH=RQH 1RWH  2SHQ*,6LQD1HZ:LQGRZZLWK0RUH)HDWXUHV 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 834 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) Pay in U.S. Funds Drawn on a U.S. Bank To: Collier County Tax Collector 3291 E. Tamiami Trail Naples, FL 34112-5758 POST DATED CHECKS ARE NOT ACCEPTED AND WILL BE RETURNED Visit our website: www.colliertaxFROOHFWRU.com Legal Description Combined Ad Valorem and Non-Ad Valorem TotalSee reverse side for important information $VVHVVHGValue 'LVWULFW Mill Rate Assessed Value Exempt Amt Taxable Value  Tax Amount Parcel Number Legal Description Mill Code Escrow Code Please Retain this portion for your records ExemptionV Millage Total Total Ad Valorem Non-Ad Valorem District Type of Assessment Amount Non-Ad Valorem Total (Detach and Return with your Payment) Parcel Number Mill Code Escrow Code Larry H. Ray CREEKSIDE EAST INC 2600 GOLDEN GATE PKWY NAPLES, FL 34105 CREEKSIDE EAST INC 2600 GOLDEN GATE PKWY NAPLES, FL 34105 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100100 $1.08 GENERAL FUND WATER MANAGEMENT FUND-SOUTH 100 BIG CYPRESS BASIN 100 SCHOOL BOARD - STATE LAW 100 SCHOOL BOARD - LOCAL BOARD 100 COLLIER MOSQUITO CONTROL 100 NNF/NORTH COLLIER FIRE CONTROL 100 UNINCORP GEN - MSTD 100 C.C. WATER POLLUTION CTRL PGM 0.0293 1000.8069 100 1.0000 0.1720 2.2480 2.8350 0.1192 0.1152 3.5645 $0.00 Pay your current taxes online at: http://www.colliertaxcollector.com/ 133 133 $1.0810.8901 29331180023 29331180023 CREEKSIDE COMMERCE PARK EAST TRACT 2 CREEKSIDE COMMERCE PARK EAST TRACT 2 0 0 0 If Paid By If Paid By 0 Sep 30, 2020 Sep 30, 2020 0 0 0 0 0.36 0 0.01 2019 Paid Collier County Notice of Ad Valorem Taxes and Non-Ad Valorem Assessments 2019 Paid Collier County Notice of Ad Valorem Taxes and Non-Ad Valorem Assessments Please Pay Please Pay 0.01 $0.00 $0.00 0.28 0.22 0.02 0.10 0.08 0.00 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 835 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) Office Hours Office Hours Main Office 8:00 am 5:00 pm (239) 252-8172 Immokalee Courthouse Annex 8:00 am 5:00 pm (239) 657-2054 Naples City Hall 9:00 am 5:00 pm (239) 434-5687 Marco Island 1040 Winterberry Dr. 8:00 am 5:00 pm (239) 394-6986 Eagle Creek Freedom Square 9:00 am 6:00 pm (239) 417-3036 Orange Blossom 2335 Orange 9:00 am 6:00 pm (239) 252-8172 Everglades City Courthouse 8:00 am 5:00 pm (239) 695-2511 Blossom Dr Golden Gate Center 9:00 am 6:00 pm (239) 455-2858 Wilson Blvd 50 S. Wilson Blvd. 9:00 am 6:00 pm (239) 348-1011 Green Tree Shopping Center 9:00 am 6:00 pm (239) 598-2525 RECEIPTS AVAILABLE ONLINE (www.colliertax.com) OR ON A WALK-IN BASIS AT ANY COLLIER COUNTY TAX COLLECTOR LOCATION. ,I you have sold any of the REAL ESTATE property assessed to you, PLEASE 5(7851 THIS NOTICE to the7$;&2//(&725 Please mail or bring bottom portion of this Notice with your remittance. Taxes and Non-Ad Valorem Assessments are due November 1, discounts have been computed as follows: 4% if paid in November 3% if paid in December 2% if paid in January 1% if paid in February Taxes and Non-Ad Valorem Assessments become delinquent April 1, at which time the law imposes: REAL ESTATE & NON-AD VALOREM A maximum of 18% per year plus other cost and fees. Tax Certificates will be sold pursuant to Florida Statutes. TANGIBLE PERSONAL PROPERTY 1 ½ % per month plus advertising and fees. Warrants will be issued pursuant to Florida Statutes. TAX COLLECTOR Responsible for preparation and mailing of tax notices based on information contained on the current tax roll certified by the Property Appraiser and Non-Ad Valorem assessments provided by the levying authorities. (239) 252-8172 PROPERTY APPRAISER- Responsible for preparation of the current Ad Valorem Tax Roll, Assessed Value, Exemptions, Taxable Value, Assessed Owners(s), name and mailing address and legal description of the property. (239) 252-8141 See insert for telephone numbers of the authorities responsible for Ad Valorem and Non-Ad Valorem rates. Before April 1st, discounts are determined by postmark. As of April 1 st, penalties are determined by date received. All payments made on or after April 1 st must be in the form of cash, cashieU·s check or money order. You may make payment of your notice of taxes and assessments at the following offices Monday thru Friday. 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 836 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict)  &ROOLHU&RXQW\3URSHUW\$SSUDLVHU3URSHUW\'HWDLO 3DUFHO1R 6LWH$GGUHVV 'LVFODLPHU 6LWH&LW\1$3/(6 6LWH=RQH 1RWH  1DPH$GGUHVV &5((.6,'(($67,1& *2/'(1*$7(3.:< &LW\1$3/(6 6WDWH )/=LS  3HUPLWV 3URYLGHGIRUUHIHUHQFHSXUSRVHVRQO\ )XOO'LVFODLPHU 7D[<U ,VVXHU 3HUPLW &2'DWH 7PS&2 )LQDO%OGJ 7\SH /DQG £ &DOF&RGH 8QLWV  $&5($*(  £%XLOGLQJ([WUD)HDWXUHV £<HDU%XLOW 'HVFULSWLRQ $UHD $GM$UHD 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 837 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict)        &ROOLHU&RXQW\3URSHUW\$SSUDLVHU3URSHUW\6XPPDU\ 3DUFHO1R 6LWH$GGUHVV 'LVFODLPHU 6LWH&LW\1$3/(6 6LWH=RQH 1RWH  1DPH$GGUHVV&5((.6,'(($67,1& *2/'(1*$7(3.:< &LW\1$3/(6 6WDWH )/=LS  0DS1R 6WUDS1R 6HFWLRQ 7RZQVKLS 5DQJH $FUHV£ (VWLPDWHG $ $     /HJDO &5((.6,'(&200(5&(3$5.($6775$&7 0LOODJH$UHD0LOODJH5DWHV£ &DOFXODWLRQV 6XE&RQGR &5((.6,'(&200(5&(3$5.($67 6FKRRO 2WKHU 7RWDO 8VH&RGH5,9(56$1'/$.(668%0(5*('/$1'6   /DWHVW6DOHV+LVWRU\ 1RWDOO6DOHVDUHOLVWHGGXHWR&RQILGHQWLDOLW\ 'DWH %RRN3DJH $PRXQW £3UHOLPLQDU\7D[5ROO 6XEMHFWWR&KDQJH /DQG9DOXH ſʫƀ,PSURYHG9DOXH ſʰƀ0DUNHW9DOXH ſʰƀ$VVHVVHG9DOXH ſʰƀ6FKRRO7D[DEOH9DOXH ſʰƀ7D[DEOH9DOXH ,IDOO9DOXHVVKRZQDERYHHTXDOWKLVSDUFHOZDVFUHDWHGDIWHUWKH)LQDO7D[5ROO £ 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 838 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict)  &ROOLHU&RXQW\3URSHUW\$SSUDLVHU3URSHUW\$HULDO 3DUFHO1R 6LWH$GGUHVV 'LVFODLPHU 6LWH&LW\1$3/(6 6LWH=RQH 1RWH  2SHQ*,6LQD1HZ:LQGRZZLWK0RUH)HDWXUHV 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 839 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) Pay in U.S. Funds Drawn on a U.S. Bank To: Collier County Tax Collector 3291 E. Tamiami Trail Naples, FL 34112-5758 POST DATED CHECKS ARE NOT ACCEPTED AND WILL BE RETURNED Visit our website: www.colliertaxFROOHFWRU.com Legal Description Combined Ad Valorem and Non-Ad Valorem TotalSee reverse side for important information $VVHVVHGValue 'LVWULFW Mill Rate Assessed Value Exempt Amt Taxable Value  Tax Amount Parcel Number Legal Description Mill Code Escrow Code Please Retain this portion for your records ExemptionV Millage Total Total Ad Valorem Non-Ad Valorem District Type of Assessment Amount Non-Ad Valorem Total (Detach and Return with your Payment) Parcel Number Mill Code Escrow Code Larry H. Ray CREEKSIDE EAST INC 2600 GOLDEN GATE PKWY NAPLES, FL 34105 CREEKSIDE EAST INC 2600 GOLDEN GATE PKWY NAPLES, FL 34105 123 123 123 123 123 123 123 123 123123 $1.33 GENERAL FUND WATER MANAGEMENT FUND-SOUTH 123 BIG CYPRESS BASIN 123 SCHOOL BOARD - STATE LAW 123 SCHOOL BOARD - LOCAL BOARD 123 COLLIER MOSQUITO CONTROL 123 NNF/NORTH COLLIER FIRE CONTROL 123 UNINCORP GEN - MSTD 123 C.C. WATER POLLUTION CTRL PGM 0.0293 1230.8069 123 1.0000 0.1720 2.2480 2.8350 0.1192 0.1152 3.5645 $0.00 Pay your current taxes online at: http://www.colliertaxcollector.com/ 133 133 $1.3310.8901 29331180609 29331180609 CREEKSIDE COMMERCE PARK EAST, PART OF TR 5. DESC AS FOLL; COMM AT NE CNR 27-48- 25, ALG E LI S01 09 Continued (See Tax Roll) CREEKSIDE COMMERCE PARK EAST, PART OF TR 5. DESC AS FOLL; COMM AT NE CNR 27-48- 25, ALG E LI S01 09 Continued (See Tax Roll) 0 0 0 If Paid By If Paid By 0 Sep 30, 2020 Sep 30, 2020 0 0 0 0 0.44 0 0.01 2019 Paid Collier County Notice of Ad Valorem Taxes and Non-Ad Valorem Assessments 2019 Paid Collier County Notice of Ad Valorem Taxes and Non-Ad Valorem Assessments Please Pay Please Pay 0.01 $0.00 $0.00 0.35 0.28 0.02 0.12 0.10 0.00 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 840 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) Office Hours Office Hours Main Office 8:00 am 5:00 pm (239) 252-8172 Immokalee Courthouse Annex 8:00 am 5:00 pm (239) 657-2054 Naples City Hall 9:00 am 5:00 pm (239) 434-5687 Marco Island 1040 Winterberry Dr. 8:00 am 5:00 pm (239) 394-6986 Eagle Creek Freedom Square 9:00 am 6:00 pm (239) 417-3036 Orange Blossom 2335 Orange 9:00 am 6:00 pm (239) 252-8172 Everglades City Courthouse 8:00 am 5:00 pm (239) 695-2511 Blossom Dr Golden Gate Center 9:00 am 6:00 pm (239) 455-2858 Wilson Blvd 50 S. Wilson Blvd. 9:00 am 6:00 pm (239) 348-1011 Green Tree Shopping Center 9:00 am 6:00 pm (239) 598-2525 RECEIPTS AVAILABLE ONLINE (www.colliertax.com) OR ON A WALK-IN BASIS AT ANY COLLIER COUNTY TAX COLLECTOR LOCATION. ,I you have sold any of the REAL ESTATE property assessed to you, PLEASE 5(7851 THIS NOTICE to the7$;&2//(&725 Please mail or bring bottom portion of this Notice with your remittance. Taxes and Non-Ad Valorem Assessments are due November 1, discounts have been computed as follows: 4% if paid in November 3% if paid in December 2% if paid in January 1% if paid in February Taxes and Non-Ad Valorem Assessments become delinquent April 1, at which time the law imposes: REAL ESTATE & NON-AD VALOREM A maximum of 18% per year plus other cost and fees. Tax Certificates will be sold pursuant to Florida Statutes. TANGIBLE PERSONAL PROPERTY 1 ½ % per month plus advertising and fees. Warrants will be issued pursuant to Florida Statutes. TAX COLLECTOR Responsible for preparation and mailing of tax notices based on information contained on the current tax roll certified by the Property Appraiser and Non-Ad Valorem assessments provided by the levying authorities. (239) 252-8172 PROPERTY APPRAISER- Responsible for preparation of the current Ad Valorem Tax Roll, Assessed Value, Exemptions, Taxable Value, Assessed Owners(s), name and mailing address and legal description of the property. (239) 252-8141 See insert for telephone numbers of the authorities responsible for Ad Valorem and Non-Ad Valorem rates. Before April 1st, discounts are determined by postmark. As of April 1 st, penalties are determined by date received. All payments made on or after April 1 st must be in the form of cash, cashieU·s check or money order. You may make payment of your notice of taxes and assessments at the following offices Monday thru Friday. 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 841 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict)  &ROOLHU&RXQW\3URSHUW\$SSUDLVHU3URSHUW\'HWDLO 3DUFHO1R 6LWH$GGUHVV 'LVFODLPHU 6LWH&LW\1$3/(6 6LWH=RQH 1RWH  1DPH$GGUHVV &5((.6,'(($67,1& *2/'(1*$7(3.:< &LW\1$3/(6 6WDWH )/=LS  3HUPLWV 3URYLGHGIRUUHIHUHQFHSXUSRVHVRQO\ )XOO'LVFODLPHU 7D[<U ,VVXHU 3HUPLW &2'DWH 7PS&2 )LQDO%OGJ 7\SH /DQG £ &DOF&RGH 8QLWV  $&5($*(  £%XLOGLQJ([WUD)HDWXUHV £<HDU%XLOW 'HVFULSWLRQ $UHD $GM$UHD 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 842 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict)        &ROOLHU&RXQW\3URSHUW\$SSUDLVHU3URSHUW\6XPPDU\ 3DUFHO1R 6LWH$GGUHVV 'LVFODLPHU 6LWH&LW\1$3/(6 6LWH=RQH 1RWH  1DPH$GGUHVV&5((.6,'(($67,1& *2/'(1*$7(3.:< &LW\1$3/(6 6WDWH )/=LS  0DS1R 6WUDS1R 6HFWLRQ 7RZQVKLS 5DQJH $FUHV£ (VWLPDWHG $ $     /HJDO &5((.6,'(&200(5&(3$5.($673$572)75'(6&$6)2//&200$71(&15$/*(/,6()77+(1&(6:)77+(1&(6:)77+(1&(1:7+(1&(1()77+(1&(6()77+(1&(1()76()77+(1&(6()77+(1&(6()77+(1&(6()77+(1&(6()77+(1&()7$/*&859(7+(1&(6:)77232%/(667+$73257,211.$&5((.6,'(&251(56&21'2$&200(5&,$//$1'&21'2$6'(6&,1253* 0LOODJH$UHD0LOODJH5DWHV£ &DOFXODWLRQV 6XE&RQGR &5((.6,'(&200(5&(3$5.($67 6FKRRO 2WKHU 7RWDO 8VH&RGH9$&$17&200(5&,$/  /DWHVW6DOHV+LVWRU\ 1RWDOO6DOHVDUHOLVWHGGXHWR&RQILGHQWLDOLW\ 'DWH %RRN3DJH $PRXQW £3UHOLPLQDU\7D[5ROO 6XEMHFWWR&KDQJH /DQG9DOXH ſʫƀ,PSURYHG9DOXH ſʰƀ0DUNHW9DOXH ſʰƀ$VVHVVHG9DOXH ſʰƀ6FKRRO7D[DEOH9DOXH ſʰƀ7D[DEOH9DOXH ,IDOO9DOXHVVKRZQDERYHHTXDOWKLVSDUFHOZDVFUHDWHGDIWHUWKH)LQDO7D[5ROO £ 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 843 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) Creekside Commerce Park East Mixed Use Subdistrict (PL20190002849) Exhibit V.E Public Facilities Level of Service Analysis December 22, 2020 Page 1 of 3 BCCPUD-19 Exhibit VE Public Facilities-r2.docx Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, FL 34134  239-947-1144  engineering@gradyminor.com  www.gradyminor.com Provide the existing Level of Service Standard (LOS) and document the impact the proposed change will have on the following public facilities: The Creekside Commerce Park East Residential Infill Subdistrict proposes to add 300 multi-family apartments within the PUD. Although the permitted medical office use of 45,800 square feet is not being eliminated, construction of the 300 units would displace approximately 45,800 square feet of medical office. The public facilities analysis evaluates the project impacts on potable Water, wastewater, drainage, parks, schools, roadways, fire/EMS, and solid waste. The source for the LOS information is the 2019 AUIR. Potable Water The property is located within the Collier County potable water service area. The County has existing plant capacity of approximately 48.75 mgd and a total permitted capacity of 52.75. The proposed 300-unit apartment complex will not create any LOS issues in the 5-year planning horizon. This Project will have no detrimental impact on the potable water system and capacity is available in Collier County. A comparison of the permitted 45,800 square feet of medical office use to the proposed multi-family apartment use is shown below. Although the medical office use is not proposed to be eliminated in the PUD; the proposed multi-family dwelling units would displace approximately 45,800 square feet of medical office space if the residential development option is pursued. Water Demand: Existing: Medical office 45,800 s.f. x 0.15 gpd = 6,870 gpd x 1.4 = 9,618 gpd (over factor) Proposed: Multi-family 300 x 120 gpd x 2.4 = 86,400 gpd Multi-family 300 x 120 gpd x 2.4 x 1.3 max. 3 day = 112,320 gpd Collier County LOS: 120 gpcd Permitted Capacity: 48.00 mgd Required Plant Capacity FY26: 39.2 mgd Data Source: Collier County 2020 AUIR Sanitary Sewer The subject project is located within the urban boundary with standards for Sanitary Sewer established in the Capital Improvement Element of the Collier County Growth Management Plan. Service to this area is provided by North Collier Waste Reclamation Facility. This Project will have no 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 844 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) Page 2 of 3 detrimental impact on the wastewater treatment system. A comparison of the permitted medical office use to the proposed Multi-family apartment use is shown below. Although the medical office use is not proposed to be eliminated in the PUD; the proposed multi-family dwelling units would displace approximately 45,800 square feet of medical office space if the residential development option is pursued. Sewer Demand: Existing: Medical office 45,800 x 0.15 gpd/sf = 6,870 gpd Medical office 45,800 x 0.15 gpd/sf x 1.5 max. month = 10,312.5 gpd Proposed: Multi-family 300 x 80 gpd x 2.4 = 57,600 gpd Multi-family 300 x 80 gpd x 2.4 x 1.5 max. 3 day = 86,400 gpd Collier County LOS: 80 gpcd Permitted Capacity FY 2021: 26.35 mgd Required Plant Capacity FY 2026: 18.6 mgd Data Source: Collier County 2020 AUIR Arterial and Collector Roads Please refer to the Traffic Impact Statement for discussions of the project’s impact on level of service for arterial and collector roadways within the project’s radius of development influence. Drainage The County has adopted a LOS standard for private developments which requires development to occur consistent with water quantity and quality standards established in Ordinances 74-50, 90-10, 2001-27, and LDC Ordinance 2004-41, as may be amended. The single project within the proposed subdistrict has been issued a surface water management permit by the South Florida Water Management District which has established criteria for the volume of water stored on site as well as the quality of the water which may be discharged from the site. The development within the subdistrict is consistent with the County LOS standards. Solid Waste The adopted LOS for solid waste is two years of lined cell capacity at the previous 3-year average tons per year disposal rate and 10 years of permittable landfill capacity of the disposal rate. There are no current capacity issues, and none are anticipated through the year 2065. Although the medical office use is not proposed to be eliminated in the PUD; the proposed multi-family dwelling units would displace approximately 45,800 square feet of medical office space if the residential development option is pursued. Existing: Medical Office 45,800 x 5 lbs/1,000 sq ft = 229 lbs/day x 365 = 83,585 lbs/year or 83.5 tons/year 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 845 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) Page 3 of 3 Proposed: Multi-family 300 x 0.73 tons per person x 2.4 = 525 tons per year Current landfill capacity in 2019 is 13,547,175 tons. Ten Year Surplus Capacity: 10,872,170 tons Source: Collier County 2019 AUIR CalRecycle.ca.gov Parks: Community and Regional The proposed 300 multi-family apartment dwellings will pay park impact fees to mitigate for their impacts on this public facility. No adverse impacts to Community or Regional Parks result from the creation of the subdistrict. Schools The proposed 300 multi-family dwellings will pay school impact fees to mitigate for their impacts. No adverse impacts to schools result from the creation of the subdistrict. Fire Control and EMS The proposed project lies within the North Collier Fire and Rescue District. The North Collier Fire and Rescue District - Station #45 is located at 1885 Veterans Park Dr., which is located less than ½ mile from the Creekside Commerce Park CPUD. No significant impacts to Fire Control level of service are anticipated due to the proposed project. Estimated impact fees for EMS and fire would be determined at time of SDP based on each unit. Sheriff, Fire Protection and EMS Services location/address of facilities intended to serve the project are; North Collier Fire and Rescue District – Station 45 1885 Veterans Park Dr., Naples, FL 34109 Collier County Sheriff North Naples Substation 776 Vanderbilt Beach Rd 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 846 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) Traffic Impact Analysis Creekside Apartments Creekside Commerce Park – Commercial Planned Unit Development (CPUD) Amendment Collier County, FL 06/18/2020 Prepared for: Prepared by: Barron Collier Companies 2600 Golden Gate Parkway Naples, FL 34105 Phone: 239.262.2600 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA 2800 Davis Boulevard, Suite 200 Naples, FL 34104 Phone: 239.566.9551 Email: ntrebilcock@trebilcock.biz Collier County Transportation Methodology Fee* – $500.00 Collier County Transportation Review Fee – Small Scale Study – No Fee Note – *to be collected at time of first submittal 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 847 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) Creekside Apartments – Creekside Commerce Park – CPUD Amendment – Traffic Impact Analysis – June 2020 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e | 2 Statement of Certification I certify that this Traffic Impact Analysis has been prepared by me or under my immediate supervision and that I have experience and training in the field of Traffic and Transportation Engineering. Norman J. Trebilcock, AICP, P.E. FL Registration No. 47116 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA 2800 Davis Boulevard, Suite 200 Naples, FL 34104 Company Cert. of Auth. No. 27796 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 848 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) Creekside Apartments – Creekside Commerce Park – CPUD Amendment – Traffic Impact Analysis – June 2020 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e | 3 Table of Contents Project Description ......................................................................................................................... 4 Trip Generation ............................................................................................................................... 5 Conclusion ....................................................................................................................................... 6 Appendices Appendix A: Project Master Site Plan ............................................................................................ 8 Appendix B: Initial Meeting Checklist (Methodology Meeting) .................................................. 10 Appendix C: Trip Generation Calculations ITE 10th Edition ........................................................ 15 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 849 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) Creekside Apartments – Creekside Commerce Park – CPUD Amendment – Traffic Impact Analysis – June 2020 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e | 4 Project Description The Creekside Commerce Park Commercial Planned Unit Development (CPUD) is located in north Naples on the south side of Immokalee Road (CR 846), and straddles Goodlette-Frank Road (CR 851). The CPUD project is approximately 106 acres in size. The subject Creekside Apartments CPUD Amendment project is located in the southeast quadrant of the of Immokalee Road (CR 846) and Goodlette-Frank Road (CR 851) intersection. Refer to Figure 1 – Project Location Map, which follows and Appendix A: Project Master Site Plan. Figure 1 – Project Location Map The CPUD has allocated 233,100 sf of Medical-Dental Office Building (Medical Office) of which 119,402 sf has been developed. The 113,698 sf of remaining future Medical Office includes a previously approved SDP for a 37,503 sf Medical Office which was submitted in 2015 but never developed. The Creekside Apartments CPUD Amendment (CPUDA) project proposes to allow a 300-unit apartment complex within the Creekside Commerce Park in exchange for, from a traffic standpoint, the allowed 37,503 sf of SDP Medical Office. In addition, the balance of Medical Office use required to ensure the proposed change to the CPUD will be traffic neutral will come from the remaining future Medical Office. 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 850 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) Creekside Apartments – Creekside Commerce Park – CPUD Amendment – Traffic Impact Analysis – June 2020 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e | 5 A methodology meeting was held with the Collier County Transportation Planning staff on February 06, 2020 via email (refer to Appendix B: Initial Meeting Checklist (Methodology Meeting). The proposed development program associated with the new residential land use is shown in Table 1, Proposed Development Program. Table 1 Proposed Development Program Land Use ITE Land Use Code Total Size* Future CPUD Medical-Dental Office Building 720 113,698 sf Proposed Creekside Apartments 220 300 dwelling units Note(s): *sf = square feet. Accesses to the site are currently provided consistent with the proposed PUD Master Site Plan as shown in Appendix A. No new PUD connections and no changes to the existing approved accesses are requested as part of this rezone amendment application. Trip Generation The project provides the highest and best use scenario with respect to the project’s proposed trip generation. The project’s site trip generation is based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition, and the software program OTISS (Online Traffic Impact Study Software, most current version). The ITE rates and equations are used for the trip generation calculations, as applicable. The ITE – OTISS trip generation calculation worksheets are provided in Appendix C: Trip Generation Calculations ITE 10th Edition. The internal capture accounts for a reduction in external traffic because of the interaction between the multiple land uses in a site. Per Collier County TIS Guidelines and Procedures, the internal capture trips should be reasonable and should not exceed 20% of the total project trips. For the purposes of this analysis, internal capture traffic reductions are not considered. The pass-by trips account for traffic that is already on the external roadway network and stops at the project on the way to a primary trip destination. In accordance with Collier County and ITE guidelines, no pass-by reductions are recommended for these land uses. The estimated trip generation based on the approved CPUD conditions is shown in Table 2A. The proposed PUD amendment projected traffic generation is illustrated in Table 2B. The net new trip generation (Table 2C) shows total proposed conditions versus existing allowed (the difference between Table 2B and Table 2A). 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 851 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) Creekside Apartments – Creekside Commerce Park – CPUD Amendment – Traffic Impact Analysis – June 2020 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e | 6 Table 2A Trip Generation (Approved CPUD Conditions) – Average Weekday Development 24 Hour Two-Way Volume AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Enter Exit Total Enter Exit Total Medical Office – 45,800 square feet 1,672 87 24 111 44 113 157 Table 2B Trip Generation (Proposed CPUDA Conditions) – Average Weekday Development 24 Hour Two-Way Volume AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Enter Exit Total Enter Exit Total Apartments – 300 dwelling units 2,227 31 104 135 99 58 157 In agreement with the Collier County TIS guidelines, significantly impacted roadways are identified consistent with the peak hour of the adjacent street traffic. Based on the information contained within the 2019 Collier County Annual Update and Inventory Report (AUIR), the peak hour for adjacent roadway network is PM. Table 2C Trip Generation (New Net External Traffic) – Average Weekday Development Net External Traffic – PM Peak Hour Enter Exit Total Proposed CPUDA 99 58 157 Approved CPUD 44 113 157 Proposed CPUDA Net New Increase/(Decrease) 55 (55) 0 The Collier County concurrency analysis (roadway link analysis) is based on the estimated net new traffic – PM peak hour average weekday. As illustrated in Table 2C, the proposed development traffic produces no additional PM peak hour 2-way trips. As such, there is no net new traffic during the PM peak hour to be evaluated for concurrency analysis purposes. Conclusion Based on the results of this analysis, the proposed CPUDA does not produce any additional unadjusted, weekday PM peak hour 2-way trips when compared to the existing approved Medical Office land use. In 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 852 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) Creekside Apartments – Creekside Commerce Park – CPUD Amendment – Traffic Impact Analysis – June 2020 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e | 7 order to be traffic neutral, the CPUD will need to reallocate 45,800 sf of the future Medical Office land use building area (which includes the 37,503 sf Medical Office which was approved but never developed) to allow the 300 residential apartments to be developed. A detailed evaluation of applicable access points will be performed at the time of site development permitting/platting to determine operational requirements, as applicable. 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 853 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) Creekside Apartments – Creekside Commerce Park – CPUD Amendment – Traffic Impact Analysis – June 2020 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e | 8 Appendix A: Project Master Site Plan 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 854 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) Creekside Apartments – Creekside Commerce Park – CPUD Amendment – Traffic Impact Analysis – June 2020 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e | 9 9.A.3.cPacket Pg. 855Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment - Creekside Apartments – Creekside Commerce Park – CPUD Amendment – Traffic Impact Analysis – June 2020 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e | 10 Appendix B: Initial Meeting Checklist (Methodology Meeting) 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 856 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) Creekside Apartments – Creekside Commerce Park – CPUD Amendment – Traffic Impact Analysis – June 2020 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e | 11 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 857 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) Creekside Apartments – Creekside Commerce Park – CPUD Amendment – Traffic Impact Analysis – June 2020 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e | 12 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 858 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) Creekside Apartments – Creekside Commerce Park – CPUD Amendment – Traffic Impact Analysis – June 2020 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e | 13 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 859 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) Creekside Apartments – Creekside Commerce Park – CPUD Amendment – Traffic Impact Analysis – June 2020 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e | 14 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 860 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) Creekside Apartments – Creekside Commerce Park – CPUD Amendment – Traffic Impact Analysis – June 2020 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e | 15 Appendix C: Trip Generation Calculations ITE 10th Edition 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 861 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) Creekside Apartments – Creekside Commerce Park – CPUD Amendment – Traffic Impact Analysis – June 2020 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e | 16 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 862 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) Creekside Apartments – Creekside Commerce Park – CPUD Amendment – Traffic Impact Analysis – June 2020 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e | 17 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 863 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) May 27, 2020 Exhibit Cover Pages.docx Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, FL 34134  239-947-1144  engineering@gradyminor.com  www.gradyminor.com Creekside Commerce Park East Mixed Use Subdistrict (PL20190002849) Exhibit V.G3 Warranty Deed(s) 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 864 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 865 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 866 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 867 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 868 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 869 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 870 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 871 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 872 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 873 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 874 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 875 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 876 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 877 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 878 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 879 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 880 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 881 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) 9.A.3.cPacket Pg. 882Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) 9.A.3.cPacket Pg. 883Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) 9.A.3.cPacket Pg. 884Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) 9.A.3.cPacket Pg. 885Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) 9.A.3.cPacket Pg. 886Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) 9.A.3.cPacket Pg. 887Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) 9.A.3.cPacket Pg. 888Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 889 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 890 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 891 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) 9.A.3.cPacket Pg. 892Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) 9.A.3.cPacket Pg. 893Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) May 27, 2020 Exhibit Cover Pages.docx Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, FL 34134  239-947-1144  engineering@gradyminor.com  www.gradyminor.com Creekside Commerce Park East Mixed Use Subdistrict (PL20190002849) Exhibit V.G5 Addressing Checklist 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 894 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 252-5724 ADDRESSING CHECKLIST Please complete the following and email to GMD_Addressing@colliergov.net or fax to the Operations Division at 239-252-5724 or submit in person to the Addressing Section at the above address. Form must be signed by Addressing personnel prior to pre-application meeting, please allow 3 days for processing. Not all items will apply to every project. Items in bold type are required. FOLIO NUMBERS MUST BE PROVIDED. Forms older than 6 months will require additional review and approval by the Addressing Section. PETITION TYPE (Indicate type below, complete a separate Addressing Checklist for each Petition type) BL (Blasting Permit) BD (Boat Dock Extension) Carnival/Circus Permit CU (Conditional Use) EXP (Excavation Permit) FP (Final Plat LLA (Lot Line Adjustment) PNC (Project Name Change) PPL (Plans & Plat Review) PSP (Preliminary Subdivision Plat) PUD Rezone RZ (Standard Rezone) SDP (Site Development Plan) SDPA (SDP Amendment) SDPI (Insubstantial Change to SDP) SIP (Site Im provement Plan) SIPI (Insubstantial Change to SIP) SNR (Street Name Change) SNC (Street Name Change – Unplatted) TDR (Transfer of Development Rights) VA (Variance) VRP (Vegetation Removal Permit) VRSFP (Vegetation Removal & Site Fill Permit) OTHER LEGAL DESCRIPT ION of subject property or properties (copy of lengthy description may be attached) FOLIO (Property ID) NUMBER(s) of above (attach to, or associate with, legal description if more than one) STREET ADDRESS or ADDRESSES (as applicable, if already assigned) PROPOSED STREET NAMES (if applicable) SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN NUMBER (for existing projects/sites only) 1 LOCATION MAP must be attached showing exact location of project/site in relation to nearest public road right- of-way PROPOSED PROJECT NAME (if applicable) SDP - or AR or PL # SURVEY (copy - needed only for unplatted properties) CURRENT PROJECT NAME (if applicable) S27 T48 R25 PUDA-PL20170000425 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 895 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 252-5724 Please Return Approved Checklist By: Email Personally picked up Applicant Name: Signature on Addressing Checklist does not constitute Project and/or Street Name approval and is subject to further review by the Operations Division. FOR STAFF USE ONLY Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Approved by: Date: Updated by: Date: IF OLDER THAN 6 MONTHS, FORM MUST BE UPDATED OR NEW FORM SUBMITTED 2 Fax Email/Fax:Phone: Project or development names proposed for, or already appearing in, condominium documents (if application; indicate whether proposed or existing) 29331193023 For the rest please see attached. 02/19/2020 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 896 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) Creekside Commerce Park CPUD Legal Description February 17, 2020 Page 1 of 4 Legal Description.docx Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, FL 34134  239-947-1144  engineering@gradyminor.com  www.gradyminor.com All that part of Section 27, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida being more particularly described as follows; COMMENCING at the northwest corner of said Section 27; thence along the north line of said Section 27 South 89°45’21” East 1869.61 feet; thence leaving said line South 00°14’39” West 125.00 feet to a point on the south right of way line of Immokalee Road (S.R. 846) and the POINT OF BEGINNING of the parcel herein described; thence along said right of way line in the following Six (6) described courses; 1) South 89°45’21” East 485.99 feet; 2) South 00°14’39” West 10.00 feet; 3) South 89°45’21” East 150.19 feet; 4) South 89°48’33” East 716.81 feet; 5) North 05°34’33” West 10.05 feet; 6) South 89°48’33” East 486.21 feet to a point on the west right of way line of Goodlette Road as recorded in Plat Book 3, page 58, Public Records of Collier County, Florida; thence along said line South 05°33’48” East 1767.02 feet; thence leaving said line South 89°20’53” West 51.18 feet; thence North 23°55’53” West 13.07 feet; thence northwesterly, 30.71 feet along the arc of a circular curve concave to the northeast, having a radius of 80.00 feet, through a central angle of 21°59’52” and being subtended by a chord which bears North 12°55’57” West 30.53 feet; thence North 05°00’53” West 31.56 feet; thence North 36°19’20” West 32.02 feet; thence North 56°04’35” West 35.11 feet; thence North 80°39’15” West 32.53 feet; thence North 88°39’12” West 97.78 feet; thence North 86°04’40” West 45.79 feet; thence North 89°49’48” West 132.77 feet; thence North 69°40’10” West 37.23 feet; thence South 89°20’53” West 142.47 feet; thence South 84°59’26” West 24.66 feet; thence South 74°56’50” West 121.32 feet; thence South 79°49’59” West 45.93 feet; thence westerly and northwesterly, 45.51 feet along the arc of a circular curve concave to the northeast, having a radius of 66.00 feet, through a central angle of 39°30’16” and being subtended by a chord which bears North 80°24’53” West 44.61 feet to a point of compound curvature; 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 897 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) Creekside Commerce Park CPUD Legal Description February 17, 2020 Page 2 of 4 Legal Description.docx Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, FL 34134  239-947-1144  engineering@gradyminor.com  www.gradyminor.com thence northwesterly, 52.92 feet along the arc of a circular curve concave to the southwest, having a radius of 150.00 feet, through a central angle of 20°12’57” and being subtended by a chord which bears North 70°46’13” West 52.65 feet; thence North 80°52’42” West 36.59 feet; thence westerly and southwesterly, 46.18 feet along the arc of a circular curve concave to the southeast, having a radius of 80.00 feet, through a central angle of 33°04’14” and being subtended by a chord which bears South 82°35’11” West 45.54 feet to a point of compound curvature; thence southwesterly and westerly, 38.16 feet along the arc of a circular curve concave to the northwest, having a radius of 60.00 feet, through a central angle of 36°26’19” and being subtended by a chord which bears South 84°16’14” West 37.52 feet to a point of compound curvature; thence westerly and northwesterly, 68.85 feet along the arc of a circular curve concave to the southwest, having a radius of 305.00 feet, through a central angle of 12°55’59” and being subtended by a chord which bears North 83°58’36” West 68.70 feet; thence South 89°33’25” West 18.36 feet; thence South 89°39’19” West 71.63 feet; thence North 89°34’56” West 36.03 feet; thence South 86°06’41” West 42.94 feet; thence South 83°44’16” West 26.23 feet; thence South 51°01’13” West 27.49 feet; thence South 33°25’50” West 19.95 feet; thence South 15°40’05” West 20.54 feet; thence South 10°54’39” West 34.64 feet; thence South 89°20’14” West 101.06 feet; thence North 10°46’06” East 101.42 feet; thence North 89°20’53” East 65.45 feet; thence North 00°39’07” West 100.64 feet; thence South 89°20’53” West 503.78 feet; thence North 00°39’07” West 27.71 feet; thence North 72°58’55” West 131.30 feet; thence North 02°08’56” West 1473.29 feet to a point on the south right of way line of said Immokalee Road (S.R. 846) and the POINT OF BEGINNING of the parcel herein described; Containing 69.48 acres more or less; Subject to easements and restrictions of record. Bearings are assumed and based on the north line of said Section 27 being South 89°49'40" East. 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 898 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) Creekside Commerce Park CPUD Legal Description February 17, 2020 Page 3 of 4 Legal Description.docx Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, FL 34134  239-947-1144  engineering@gradyminor.com  www.gradyminor.com All that part of Section 27, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida being more particularly described as follows; Commencing at the northeast corner of said Section 27; thence along the east line of said Section 27, South 01°09’43” East 125.00 feet to a point on the south right of way line of Immokalee Road (S.R. 846) and the POINT OF BEGINNING of the parcel herein described; thence continue along said east line South 01°09’43” East 1189.62 feet; thence leaving said line South 89°48’50” West 677.35 feet; thence South 05°35’39” East 886.02 feet; thence South 89°48’50” West 400.00 feet to a point on the easterly right of way line of Goodlette Frank Road as Recorded in Plat Book 13, page 58, Public records of Collier County, Florida; thence along said line North 05°35’39” West 2088.10 feet to a point of the south right of way line of said Immokalee Road (S.R. 846); thence along said line South 89°49’40” East 1168.55 feet; thence continue along said line South 89°12’58” East 1.85 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING of the parcel herein described; Containing 38.9 acres more or less; Subject to easements and restrictions of record. Bearings are assumed and based on the north line of said Section 27 being South 89°46'26" East. LESS A PORTION OF TRACTS “R” AND “L1” CREEKSIDE COMMERCE PARK WEST-UNIT ONE AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 29 AT PAGES 57 THROUGH 58 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGIN AT THE NORTHWESTERLY MOST CORNER OF TRACT “R” (CREEKSIDE WAY) CREEKSIDE COMMERCE PARK WEST-UNIT ONE AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 29 AT PAGES 57 THROUGH 58 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE RUN SOUTH 89°45'00" EAST, ALONG THE SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY OF IMMOKALEE ROAD FOR A DISTANCE OF 249.45 FEET; THENCE RUN SOUTH 00°25'51" WEST FOR A DISTANCE OF 107.22 FEET; THENCE RUN SOUTH 60°02'56" EAST FOR A DISTANCE OF 117.20 FEET; THENCE RUN SOUTH 82°32'14" EAST FOR A DISTANCE OF 119.17 FEET TO 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 899 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) Creekside Commerce Park CPUD Legal Description February 17, 2020 Page 4 of 4 Legal Description.docx Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, FL 34134  239-947-1144  engineering@gradyminor.com  www.gradyminor.com A POINT ON THE EAST LINE OF TRACT “L1” OF SAID CREEKSIDE COMMERCE PARK WEST-UNIT ONE, ALSO BEING THE WES LINE OF LOT 3 OF SAID CREEKSIDE COMMERCE PARK WEST-UNIT ONE; THENCE RUN SOUTH 00°07'39" EAST, ALONG SAID EAST LINE FOR A DISTANCE OF 111.93 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY OF SAID TRACT “R”; THENCE RUN NORTH 89°58'01" WEST, ALONG SAID NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR A DISTANCE OF 456.64 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY OF SAID TRACT “R”; THENCE RUN NORTH 02°19'57" WEST, ALONG SAID WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR A DISTANCE OF 294.20 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; CONTAINING 2.32 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 900 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) ParcelID Name1 StreetNumber Street 29331193023 CREEKSIDE COMMERCE PARK 1354 CREEKSIDE BLVD 29331193049 RES FLORIDA 1250 HOLDINGS LLC 1293 CREEKSIDE ST 29331193065 CREEKSIDE COMMERCE PARK 29331193081 RES FLORIDA 1370 HOLDINGS LLC 1370 CREEKSIDE BLVD 29331193104 RES FLORIDA 1370 HOLDINGS LLC 1370 CREEKSIDE BLVD 29331193120 RES FLORIDA 1370 HOLDINGS LLC 1360 CREEKSIDE BLVD 29331193146 RES FLORIDA 1370 HOLDINGS LLC 29331193188 CREEKSIDE HOSPITALITY LLC 1317 INNOVATION BLVD 29331193227 RES FLORIDA 1284 HOLDING LLC 1284 INNOVATION DR 29331193243 RES FLORIDA 1265 HOLDINGS, LLC 1265 CREEKSIDE PKWY 29331190521 CREEKSIDE COMMERCE PARK 1157 CREEKSIDE PKWY 29331190660 CREEKSIDE COMMERCE PARK 1131 ARTHREX BLVD 29331190686 RES FLORIDA 1255 HOLDINGS LLC 1255 CREEKSIDE PKWY 29331190709 CREEKSIDE WEST INC 1252 IMMOKALEE RD 29331190725 RANI INVESTMENTS LLC 1175 CREEKSIDE PKWY 29331190848 UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE 1130 CREEKSIDE PKWY 29331180023 CREEKSIDE EAST INC 29331180049 CREEKSIDE EAST INC 29331180544 CREEKSIDE EAST INC 29331180560 CREEKSIDE EAST INC 29331180586 CREEKSIDE EAST INC 29331180609 CREEKSIDE EAST INC 29331180612 WHITE OAKS REAL ESTATE 1285 CREEKSIDE BLVD E 29331181103 CREEKSIDE EAST INC 29331181129 CREEKSIDE EAST INC 29331181145 CREEKSIDE EAST INC 29331181161 CREEKSIDE EAST INC 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 901 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) Immokalee RD Goodlette-Frank RD NCreekside BLVD C o l l i e r s R e s e r v e D R Br as s i e BNDCreekside PKWY Niblick LNHealth Park BLVDCreekside BLVD EM e d ic al B LVD Bentgrass BND Creekside STBarcarmi l WAYRemington WAYMashie CTSource: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AeroGRID, IGN, and the GIS User Community Creekside Commerce Park PUD Location Map . 560 0 560280 Feet Legend Creekside PUD 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 902 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) May 27, 2020 Exhibit Cover Pages.docx Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, FL 34134  239-947-1144  engineering@gradyminor.com  www.gradyminor.com Creekside Commerce Park East Mixed Use Subdistrict (PL20190002849) Exhibit V.G6 Pre-application Meeting Notes 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 903 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 904 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 905 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 906 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 907 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 908 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 909 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 910 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 911 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 912 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 913 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 914 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 915 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 916 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 917 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 918 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 919 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 920 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. Ph. 239-947-1144 Fax. 239-947-0375 3800 Via Del Rey EB 0005151 LB 0005151 LC 26000266 Bonita Springs, FL 34134 www.gradyminor.com Project Location Map NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING Petitions PL20190002849 Creekside Commerce Park East Mixed Use Subdistrict (GMPA) and PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUD Amendment (PUDA) A Neighborhood Information Meeting hosted by D. Wayne Arnold, AICP, of Q. Grady Minor and Associates, P.A. and Richard D. Yovanovich, Esq. of Coleman, Yovanovich & Koester, P.A., representing Creekside East, Inc. (Applicant) will be held on Wednesday, January 6, 2021, 5:30 pm at Saint Monica’s Episcopal Church, 7070 Immokalee Road, Naples, FL 34119. Individuals who would like to participate remotely or have questions or comments should contact Sharon Umpenhour, Senior Planning Technician with Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. by email: sumpenhour@gradyminor.com, phone: 239-947-1144, or mail: 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, FL 34134. Project information is posted online at www.gradyminor.com/planning. Creekside East, Inc. has submitted formal applications to Collier County, seeking approval of a Small-Scale Growth Management Plan (GMP) Amendment and a Planned Unit Development (PUD) Amendment. The GMP amendment proposes to revise the Future Land Use Element to create the Creekside Commerce Park East Mixed Use Subdistrict. The plan amendment establishes a maximum of 300 multi-family rental units to be constructed in the 9.9± acre subdistrict, which will be located on the east side Goodlette-Frank Road within the ‘B’ District of the Creekside Commerce Park PUD. The companion PUD amendment proposes to amend the Creekside Commerce Park PUD to construct a maximum of 300 multi-family dwelling units east of Goodlette-Frank Road as a development option. The addition of the residential use is to the ‘B’ District within the PUD. The maximum vehicular trip generation figure in Section 2.16.L has not been revised with the addition of the multi-family residential use because the PUD proposes no change to the previously established trip cap. The Conceptual PUD Master Plan has been modified to show the Creekside Commerce Park East Mixed Use Subdistrict located east of Goodlette- Frank Road. The GMP amendment subject property is comprised of approximately 9.9± acres, located within the Creekside Commerce Park PUD east of Goodlette-Frank Road. The Creekside Commerce Park PUD is comprised of 106± acres, located on the southwest and southeast quadrant of Immokalee Road and Goodlette-Frank Road in Section 27, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. The Neighborhood Information Meeting is for informational purposes only, it is not a public hearing. 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 921 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) 1NAME1 NAME2 NAME3 NAME4 NAME5 NAME6 LEGAL1 LEGAL2 LEGAL3 LEGAL4 FOLIOA K S SW FLORIDA LLC 743 BENTWATER CIR APT 201NAPLES, FL 34108---6735 NORTH NAPLES MEDICAL PARK LOT 264280000426ARHC BSNPLFL01 LLC 1735 MARKET ST A400PHILADELPHIA, PA 19103---0 CREEKSIDE EAST LAND CONDOMINIUM UNIT 129333000020ARTHUR J WARBURTON REV TRUST MARGARET MARY EILEEN WARBURTON REVOCABLE TRUST1395 REMINGTON CT #9202 NAPLES, FL 34110---0 REMINGTON RESERVE A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 90469229000725BARBOT TR, IVONNE MARTINEZ IVONNE MARTINEZ BARBOT TRUST 1375 REMINGTON CT #7101NAPLES, FL 34110---942 REMINGTON RESERVE A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 70169229000505BERONJA, BRANKO M & JOANNE M 1355 REMINGTON WAY #5201NAPLES, FL 34110---0 REMINGTON RESERVE A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 40469229000327BERONJA, BRANKO M & JOANNE M 1355 REMINGTON WAY UNIT 5201NAPLES, FL 34110---0 REMINGTON RESERVE A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 50369229000385BONNEY K LETT REV TRUST 1340 REMINGTON WAY APT 10202NAPLES, FL 34110---938 REMINGTON RESERVE A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 100469229000806BRONSNICK, DEANNA D 50 STERLING DRCHATHAM, NJ 07928---0 REMINGTON RESERVE A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 70469229000563C TURTLE OF NAPLES INC 5455 JAEGER RD STE ANAPLES, FL 34109---5805 GULFCOAST MEDICAL ARTS CENTER A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 3-A48501000189CBYW NAPLES PROPCO LLC % WELLTOWER INC 4500 DORR STREETTOLEDO, OH 43615---0 SOUTHWEST PROFESSIONAL HEALTH PARK TRACT A74445100504CBYW NAPLES PROPCO LLC % WELLTOWER INC 4500 DORR STREETTOLEDO, OH 43615---0 SOUTHWEST PROFESSIONAL HEALTH PARK TRACT P74445101325CHERYL P SACHS TRUST 1315 REMINGTON WAY UNIT 1202NAPLES, FL 34110---0 REMINGTON RESERVE A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 10469229000084COLLIER CNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 3301 TAMIAMI TRL ENAPLES, FL 34112---0 26 48 25 SW1/4 OF NW1/4 LESS E 30FT & E 60FT OF N 60FT 39.05 AC OR 11O6 PG 1648 00166840007COLLIER CNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 3301 TAMIAMI TRL E BLDG FNAPLES, FL 34112---4902 27 48 25 COMM SE CNR SEC W100.04FT, N 2637.85FT, CONT N 1315.14FT, E 100.01FT, S 1314.70FT, CONT S 2640.71FT 00168040009COLLIER CNTY TRANSPORTATION RIGHT-OF-WAY 2885 HORSESHOE DRIVE SNAPLES, FL 34104---0 26 48 25 COM AT N1/4 CNR SEC 26, S 100' & POB, S 89 DEG W 146.02', S 50', N 89 DEG E 146.5', N 50' TO POB AND COMM 00167720100COLLIER CNTY TRANSPORTATION RIGHT-OF-WAY 2885 HORSESHOE DRIVE SNAPLES, FL 34104---0 PORTION OF TR B OF COLLIER HEALTH PARK DESC IN OR 3690 PG 3601 27167500400COLLIER CNTY TRANSPORTATION RIGHT-OF-WAY 2885 HORSESHOE DRIVE SNAPLES, FL 34104---0 FRANK BOULEVARD (FRANK BOULEVARD C-851) & THAT PORTION ADDED FOR ROAD WIDEN- ING AS DESC IN OR 3057 PG 3387 34500000107COLLIER HEALTH CARE INC PO BOX 413029NAPLES, FL 34101---3029 NORTH NAPLES MEDICAL PARK LOT 764280000523COLLIER HEALTH CARE INC PO BOX 413029NAPLES, FL 34101---3029 COLLIER HEALTH PARK THAT PORT OF TRACT "C" DESC AS: COM SWCNR LOT 7 NORTH NAPLES MEDICAL PARK, S 31'17"W 5.39FT, N 8927167550214COLLIER HEALTH PARK OWNERS' ASSOCIATION INC 560 DELAWARE AVE #300BUFFALO, NY 14202---0 COLLIER HEALTH PARK TRACT D, LESS THAT PORTION VACATED ON RES # 91-634 OR 1650 PG 1686 27167550405COLLIER'S RESERVE ASSOC INC 11711 COLLIERS RESERVE DRNAPLES, FL 34110---909 COLLIER'S RESERVE TRACT "R", LESS THAT PORTION DESC IN OR 2476 PG 1125 REF AS CROSSPOINTE DR, LESS THAT 27185003251COLLIER'S RESERVE ASSOC INC 11715 COLLIERS RESERVE DRNAPLES, FL 34110---909 COLLIER'S RESERVE TRACT 01-06 LESS THAT PART LYING E OF TR R DESC IN OR 3659 PG 3087 27185003756COOLCHANGE LAND TRUST 1315 REMINGTON WAY #1102NAPLES, FL 34110---0 REMINGTON RESERVE A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 10269229000042COUNTY WATER-SEWER DISTRICT UTILITY DIVISION COLLIER COUNTY COURTHOUSE 3301 TAMIAMI TRL E BLDG F NAPLES, FL 34112---4902 27 48 25 COM SE CNR, W 100FT, N 1500FT TO POB CONT N 2455.41FT, WLY 577.2FT, SLY 886.02FT, WLY 400FT, SLY 00167840006CREEKSIDE COMMERCE PARK PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOC INC 2600 GOLDEN GATE PKWYNAPLES, FL 34101---0 CREEKSIDE COMMERCE PARK WEST UNIT ONE TRACT L1 LESS OR 3661 PG 2087 29331190521CREEKSIDE COMMERCE PARK PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOC INC 2600 GOLDEN GATE PKWYNAPLES, FL 34105---3227 CREEKSIDE COMMERCE PARK WEST UNIT ONE TRACT R29331190660CREEKSIDE COMMERCE PARK PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOC INC 2600 GOLDEN GATE PKWYNAPLES, FL 34105---3227 CREEKSIDE COMMERCE PARK WEST UNIT TWO TRACT R LESS THAT PART DESC IN OR 3926 PG 2925 29331193023CREEKSIDE COMMERCE PARK PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOC INC 2600 GOLDEN GATE PKWYNAPLES, FL 34105---3227 CREEKSIDE COMMERCE PARK WEST UNIT TWO TRACT O329331193065CREEKSIDE COMMERCE PARK PROPERTY OWNERS ASSSN INC 2600 GOLDEN GATE PKWYNAPLES, FL 34105---0 ARTHREX BOULEVARD TRACT O22435007724CREEKSIDE EAST INC % BARRON COLLIER COMPANIES 2600 GOLDEN GATE PARKWAYNAPLES, FL 34105---0 CREEKSIDE EAST LAND CONDOMINIUM UNIT 229333000046CREEKSIDE EAST INC 2600 GOLDEN GATE PKWYNAPLES, FL 34103---0 CREEKSIDE COMMERCE PARK EAST TRACT P-229331181145CREEKSIDE EAST INC 2600 GOLDEN GATE PKWYNAPLES, FL 34105---0 CREEKSIDE CORNERS CONDOMINIUM A COMMERCIAL LAND CONDOMINIUM UNIT 123991198024CREEKSIDE EAST INC 2600 GOLDEN GATE PKWYNAPLES, FL 34105---0 CREEKSIDE CORNERS CONDOMINIUM A COMMERCIAL LAND CONDOMINIUM UNIT 223991198040CREEKSIDE EAST INC 2600 GOLDEN GATE PKWYNAPLES, FL 34105---0 CREEKSIDE COMMERCE PARK EAST TRACT 229331180023CREEKSIDE EAST INC 2600 GOLDEN GATE PKWYNAPLES, FL 34105---0 CREEKSIDE COMMERCE PARK EAST TRACT 3, LESS THAT PORTION NKA CREEKSIDE EAST LAND CONDO AS DESC29331180049CREEKSIDE EAST INC 2600 GOLDEN GATE PKWYNAPLES, FL 34105---0 CREEKSIDE CO MMERCE PARK EAST TRACT 429331180544CREEKSIDE EAST INC 2600 GOLDEN GATE PKWYNAPLES, FL 34105---0 CREEKSIDE COMMERCE PARK EAST TRACT 4A29331180560CREEKSIDE EAST INC 2600 GOLDEN GATE PKWYNAPLES, FL 34105---0 CREEKSIDE COMMERCE PARK EAST TRACT 4B29331180586CREEKSIDE EAST INC 2600 GOLDEN GATE PKWYNAPLES, FL 34105---0 CREEKSIDE COMMERCE PARK EAST, PART OF TR 5. DESC AS FOLL; COMM AT NE CNR 27-48-25, ALG E LI S01 09 43E 696.85 29331180609CREEKSIDE EAST INC 2600 GOLDEN GATE PKWYNAPLES, FL 34105---0 CREEKSIDE COMMERCE PARK EAST TRACT 629331181103CREEKSIDE EAST INC 2600 GOLDEN GATE PKWYNAPLES, FL 34105---0 CREEKSIDE COMMERCE PARK EAST TRACT P-129331181129CREEKSIDE EAST INC 2600 GOLDFEN GATE PKWYNAPLES, FL 34105---0 CREEKSIDE COMMERCE PARK EAST TRACT P-329331181161CREEKSIDE HOSPITALITY LLC 1370 CREEKSIDE BLVDNAPLES, FL 34108---1945 CREEKSIDE COMMERCE PARK WEST UNIT TWO LOT 11 AND THAT PORTION OF LOT 12 AS DESC IN OR 5500 PG 1221 29331193188CREEKSIDE WEST INC % RYAN LLC THREE GALLERIA TOWER 13155 NOEL RD #100 LB73 DALLAS, TX 75240---0 CREEKSIDE COMMERCE PARK WEST UNIT ONE LOT 2, AND E 32.84FT OF LOT 3, LESS OR 3663 PG 2579 29331190709CUMMINGS JR, PAUL A BARBARA M CUMMINGS 12029 COLLIERS RESERVE DRIVENAPLES, FL 34110---0 REMINGTON RESERVE A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 50169229000343D & B CRANDALL FAM LIM PRTNRSH 777 WEDGE DRNAPLES, FL 34103---4447 ROYAL PALM BUILDING A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 10171360000041D'ALESSANDRO, JOSEPH A CYNTHIA A D'ALESSANDRO300 LUZERNE AVEWEST PITTSTON, PA 18643---2234 REMINGTON RESERVE A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 40269229000288DENNIS STABILE DEC OF TRUST 1340 REMINGTON WAY #201NAPLES, FL 34110---0 REMINGTON RESERVE A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 100369229000783DONLEY, DAVID S PO BOX 272PICKERINGTON, OH 43147---0 REMINGTON RESERVE A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 80469229000644DONLEY, MICHAEL D 7600 FARMSBURY DRREYNOLDSBURG, OH 43068---3150 REMINGTON RESERVE A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 30269229000204DUGAN, M KEVIN & MARGARET M 11611 USEPPA CTNAPLES, FL 34110---925 REMINGTON RESERVE A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 50269229000369ECKERTY TR, THOMAS G UNRECORDED LAND TRUST UTD 04/02/9612734 KENWOOD LN STE 89 FORT MYERS, FL 33907---5638 SOUTHWEST PROFESSIONAL HEALTH PARK TRACT R74445101341ENCORE VENTURE LLC 8009 KILKENNY COURTNAPLES, FL 34112---0 ROYAL PALM BUILDING A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 30171360000122ESTATES AT BAY COLONY GOLF CLUB, THE 10495 GOODLETTE-FRANK RD NNAPLES, FL 34109---0 MASHIE COURT AT THE ESTATES AT BAY COLONY GOLF CLUB TRACT A59934000020FARLEY WHITE CHP LLC %FARLEY WHITE INTERESTS LLC 155 FEDERAL STREET STE 1800 BOSTON, MA 02110---0 COLLIER HEALTH PARK CONDOMINIUM A COMMERCIAL LAND CONDOMINIUM UNIT 1 27167400021FARLEY WHITE CHP LLC %FARLEY WHITE INTERESTS LLC 155 FEDERAL STREET STE 1800 BOSTON, MA 02110---0 COLLIER HEALTH PARK CONDOMINIUM A COMMERCIAL LAND CONDOMINIUM UNIT 2 27167400047FLP 1750 LLC PO BOX 492ALPENA, MI 49707---0 RUBELL MEDICAL CENTER CONDOMINIUM A COMMERCIAL LAND CONDOMINIUM UNIT 1 71723900021FLP 1750 LLC PO BOX 492ALPENA, MI 49707---0 RUBELL MEDICAL CENTER CONDOMINIUM A COMMERCIAL LAND CONDOMINIUM UNIT 2 71723900047FLP 1750 LLC PO BOX 492ALPENA, MI 49707---0 RUBELL MEDICAL CENTER CONDOMINIUM A COMMERCIAL LAND CONDOMINIUM UNIT 3 71723900063FRANCES L NAPLES REV LIV TRUST 1345 REMINGTON WAY #4201NAPLES, FL 34110---0 REMINGTON RESERVE A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 40369229000301GALBRAITH, BEVERLY F 1320 REMINGTON WAY UNIT 1201NAPLES, FL 34110---0 REMINGTON RESERVE A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 120169229000903GEORGIA K DANIS REV TRUST 11216 TAMIAMI TRL N # 207NAPLES, FL 34110---1640 REMINGTON RESERVE A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 20369229000149GOLDMAN, LAWRENCE E & CAROL A 1355 REMINGTON WAY #5202NAPLES, FL 34110---0 REMINGTON RESERVE A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 50469229000408HEITMANN TR, TERESA L PETERSEN TR, ROBERT A=& JUDY C TERESA L HEITMANN REV TRUST ROBERT A PETERSEN REV TRUST 1660 MEDICAL BLVD STE 300 NAPLES, FL 34110---1497 ROYAL PALM BUILDING A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 30071360000106HERBKERSMAN, MARY K 1385 REMINGTON CT #8101NAPLES, FL 34110---0 REMINGTON RESERVE A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 80169229000589HOGAN, KAREN B 9751 BENTGRASS BNDNAPLES, FL 34108---1933 BENTGRASS BEND AT THE ESTATES AT BAY COLONY GOLF CLUB LOT 8023932000443ISTOCK TR, JUDITH A JUDITH A ISTOCK TRUST 12/16/93 9659 MASHIE CTNAPLES, FL 34108---1997 MASHIE COURT AT THE ESTATES AT BAY COLONY GOLF CLUB LOT 5559934000062JENSING INC 5550 HERON POINT DR #1102NAPLES, FL 34108---0 GULFCOAST MEDICAL ARTS CENTER A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 1-A48501000024JG PROPERTIES OF NAPLES LLC 3180 FORT CHARLES DRNAPLES, FL 34102---7923 NORTH NAPLES MEDICAL PARK LOT 364280000442JONES, MICHAEL A & JANET E 9671 MASHIE CTNAPLES, FL 34108---1997 MASHIE COURT AT THE ESTATES AT BAY COLONY GOLF CLUB LOT 5859934000127JRW NORTH OFFICE LLC 9130 CORSEA DEL FONTANA WAYNAPLES, FL 34109---0 CITIZENS NATIONAL BANK CENTER A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 11026090000049JSS PROPERTIES INC 5822 SPANISH OAKS LNNAPLES, FL 34119---1154 GULFCOAST MEDICAL ARTS CENTER A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 2-A48501000105JSS PROPERTIES INC 5822 SPANISH OAKS LNNAPLES, FL 34119---1154 GULFCOAST MEDICAL ARTS CENTER A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 2-B48501000121JSS PROPERTIES INC 5822 SPANISH OAKS LNNAPLES, FL 34119---1154 GULFCOAST MEDICAL ARTS CENTER A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 2-D48501000150JUDSON, JACKIE 1340 REMINGTON WAY #1002NAPLES, FL 34110---938 REMINGTON RESERVE A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 100269229000767KALBACH, JAMES C & DONNA L 214 E KING STREETEDENTON, NC 27932---0 REMINGTON RESERVE A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 70269229000521KARP, CLAUDIA 12285 SW 1ST STCORAL SPRINGS, FL 33071---8059 REMINGTON RESERVE A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 100169229000741KSSK LLC 15187 BROLIO WAYNAPLES, FL 34110---2719 GULFCOAST MEDICAL ARTS CENTER A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 1-B48501000040KSSK LLC 15187 BROLIO WAYNAPLES, FL 34110---2719 GULFCOAST MEDICAL ARTS CENTER A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 1-C48501000066L GEORGE KLAUS TRUST 9759 BENTGRASS BNDNAPLES, FL 34108---1933 BENTGRASS BEND AT THE ESTATES AT BAY COLONY GOLF CLUB LOT 7823932000401LARE JR, JOHN & NANCY H 1365 REMINGTON WAY #6201NAPLES, FL 34110---0 REMINGTON RESERVE A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 60369229000466LJZ PROPERTIES LTD 1435 IMMOKALEE RDNAPLES, FL 34110---1401 COLLIER HEALTH PARK REPLAT OF TRACT B-127167550489LUKAS, CYNTHIA A 8749 N CLEAR LAKE RDMILTON, WI 53563---0 REMINGTON RESERVE A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 20169229000107LUND, THOMAS C & CAROL A5150 TAMIAMI TRL N #300NAPLES, FL 34103---0 BENTGRASS BEND AT THE ESTATES AT BAY COLONY GOLF CLUB LOT 7923932000427M T V L LLC 1713 SW HEALTH PKWY STE 1NAPLES, FL 34109---502 SOUTHWEST PROFESSIONAL HEALTH PARK THAT PORTION OF TRACT B1 DESC AS: COM NW CNR TRACT B1, N 89DEG 55'29"E 238.82FT TO A 74445100821MCCONNELL, BRUCE T EMILY J WOLFE36980 FOX RUNFARMINGTON HILLS, MI 48331---0 REMINGTON RESERVE A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 90369229000709MCELROY, WALTER R PAMELA J MCELROY 1375 REMINGTON CT #7201NAPLES, FL 34110---0 REMINGTON RESERVE A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 70369229000547MERCER, THOMAS A & GAIL T 904 COUNTRY CLUB DRIVEBOWLING GREEN, OH 43402---0 REMINGTON RESERVE A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 120269229000929MEYER JR, ANDREW C & KATHLEEN240 FAIRHAVEN HILL RDCONCORD, MA 01742---0 MASHIE COURT AT THE ESTATES AT BAY COLONY GOLF CLUB LOTS 59 AND 60 59934000143MPG HEALTH PARKWAY LLC 6321 DANIEL PWKY #200FORT MYERS, FL 33912---0 SOUTHWEST PROFESSIONAL HEALTH PARK TRACT B1, LESS THAT PORTION DESC IN OR 2598 PG 1508 74445100805NAPE, DAVID J & CYNTHIA J 60 PINECONE LNSHAVERTOWN, PA 18708---9543 REMINGTON RESERVE A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 60269229000440NAPLES 9 LLC 12763 STARK RD STE 101LIVONIA, MI 48150---1535 CITIZENS NATIONAL BANK CENTER A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 10026090000023NAPLES 9 LLC 12763 STARK RD STE 101LIVONIA, MI 48150---1535 CITIZENS NATIONAL BANK CENTER A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 20026090000081NAPLES 9 LLC 12763 STARK RD STE 101LIVONIA, MI 48150---1535 CITIZENS NATIONAL BANK CENTER A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 21026090000104NAPLES 9 LLC 12763 STARK RD STE 101LIVONIA, MI 48150---1535 CITIZENS NATIONAL BANK CENTER A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 30026090000120NAPLES CHIROPRACTIC CENTER INC C/O WHITE HERON WELLNESS CTR 1775 ARLINGTON ST STE 2 SARASOTA, FL 34239---0 GULFCOAST MEDICAL ARTS CENTER A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 2-E48501000163NAPLES COMMUNITY HOSPITAL INC 350 7TH ST NNAPLES, FL 34102---5754 COLLIER HEALTH PARK TRACT C, LESS THAT PORTION DESC IN OR 2445 PG 217727167550201NAPLES COMMUNITY HOSPITAL INC 350 7TH STREET NNAPLES, FL 34102---0 NORTH NAPLES MEDICAL PARK LOT 1 LESS ORDER OF TAKING 04- 3779 DESC IN OR 3697 PG 260 64280000400NAPLES COMMUNITY HOSPITAL INC PO BOX 413029NAPLES, FL 34101---3029 NORTH NAPLES MEDICAL PARK LOT 664280000507NATIONWIDE HLTH PROPERTIES INC % ALTUS GROUP US INC 21001 N TATUM BLVD #1630-630PHOENIX, AZ 85050---0 SOUTHWEST PROFESSIONAL HEALTH PARK TRACT B374445101105NCHMD INC350 7TH STREET NNAPLES, FL 34102---0 NORTH NAPLES MEDICAL PARK LOTS 4 AND 564280000468Notice: This data belongs to the Collier County Property Appraiser's Office (CCPA). Therefore, the recipient agrees not to represent this data to anyone as other than CCPA provided data. The recipient may not transfer this data to others without consent from the CCPA.Petition: PL20190002849(GMPA) & PL20190002850(PUDA) | Buffer: 500' | Date: 11/3/2020 | Site Location: Creekside Commerce Park CPUDPOList_500_PL20190002849-PL20190002850.xls9.A.3.cPacket Pg. 922Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) 2NEWTON JR, ROBERT D & KIM M 1330 REMINGTON WAY #11101NAPLES, FL 34110---0 REMINGTON RESERVE A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 110169229000822NMP OF NAPLES LLC 1890 SW HEALTH PKWY STE 100NAPLES, FL 34109---473 GULFCOAST MEDICAL ARTS CENTER A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 1-E48501000095NORTH NAPLES MEDICAL PARK OWNERS ASSOCIATION PO BOX 413029NAPLES, FL 34101---3029 NORTH NAPLES MEDICAL PARK TRACT R64280000387NORTH NAPLES MEDICAL PARK OWNERS ASSOCIATION INC PO BOX 413029NAPLES, FL 34101---3029 NORTH NAPLES MEDICAL PARK TRACT P-164280000060NORTH NAPLES MEDICAL PARK OWNERS ASSOCIATION INC PO BOX 413029NAPLES, FL 34101---3029 NORTH NAPLES MEDICAL PARK TRACT P-264280000361NOVAK, MICHAEL A & BRIDGETTE A 1660 MEDICAL BLVD STE 200NAPLES, FL 34110---1416 ROYAL PALM BUILDING A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 20071360000067NOVAK, MICHAEL A & BRIDGETTE A 1660 MEDICAL BLVD STE 200NAPLES, FL 34110---1416 ROYAL PALM BUILDING A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 20171360000083OLSON, JAY & KATHLYN 1335 REMINGTON WAY APT 3201NAPLES, FL 34110---937 REMINGTON RESERVE A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 30369229000220PALM 100 LLC 1660 MEDICAL BLVD SUITE 100NAPLES, FL 34110---0 ROYAL PALM BUILDING A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 10071360000025PGA FAMILY REALTY LLC 408 COLLEGE AVENUE SUITE #1ITHACA, NY 14850---0 COLLIER HEALTH PARK CONDOMINIUM A COMMERCIAL LAND CONDOMINIUM UNIT 3 27167400063PGA FAMILY REALTY LLC 408 COLLEGE AVENUE SUITE #1ITHACA, NY 14850---0 COLLIER HEALTH PARK CONDOMINIUM A COMMERCIAL LAND CONDOMINIUM UNIT 4 27167400089PIKE, JOSEPH D & CHAN POYNER 9663 MASHIE COURTNAPLES, FL 34108---1997 MASHIE COURT AT THE ESTATES AT BAY COLONY GOLF CLUB LOT 56 AND LOT 57 59934000088PLAYTPUS PROPERTIES SUB IV LLC 11623 USEPPA CTNAPLES, FL 34110---0 REMINGTON RESERVE A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 20269229000123POTIER, MICHEL & PATRICIA 1325 REMINGTON WAY APT 2202NAPLES, FL 34110---934 REMINGTON RESERVE A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 20469229000165PRATT, KRISTIN LEIGH 1365 REMINGTON WAY #6101NAPLES, FL 34110---0 REMINGTON RESERVE A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 60169229000424QUATRO LLC 363 NEPTUNES BIGHTNAPLES, FL 34103---0 REMINGTON RESERVE A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 80369229000628QUILLIN TR, ANDREW D MICHELLE C QUILLIN TR4635 ABERDEEN AVEDUBLIN, OH 43016---9529 REMINGTON RESERVE A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 30469229000246RANI INVESTMENTS LLC 425 DOCKSIDE DR # 602NAPLES, FL 34110---0 CREEKSIDE COMMERCE PARK WEST UNIT ONE LOT 3, LESS OR 3662 PG 1812, LESS E 32.84FT OF LOT 3 29331190725RES FLORIDA 1250 HOLDINGS LLC 1265 CREEKSIDE PARKWAY SUITE 210NAPLES, FL 34108---0 CREEKSIDE COMMERCE PARK LOT 429331194022RES FLORIDA 1250 HOLDINGS LLC 1265 CREEKSIDE PKWY STE 210NAPLES, FL 34108---0 CREEKSIDE COMMERCE PARK WEST UNIT TWO TRACT O229331193049RES FLORIDA 1255 HOLDINGS LLC % JOHN SCHMIEDING 1370 CREEKSIDE BLVDNAPLES, FL 34108---1945 CREEKSIDE COMMERCE PARK WEST UNIT ONE LOT 1 LESS OR 3661 PG 2083 29331190686RES FLORIDA 1265 HOLDINGS, LLC 1370 CREEKSIDE BLVDNAPLES, FL 34108---0 CREEKSIDE COMMERCE PARK WEST UNIT TWO LOT 14 AND 15 AND THAT PART OF TR R AS DESC IN OR 3926 PG 2925 (RES 06-73) 29331193243RES FLORIDA 1284 HOLDING LLC 1370 CREEKSIDE BLVDNAPLES, FL 34108---0 CREEKSIDE COMMERCE PARK WEST UNIT TWO LOT 13 AND THAT PART OF LOT 12 FURTHER DESC AS: BEG AT THE NE CNR OF LOT 13, RUN S29331193227RES FLORIDA 1336 HOLDINGS LLC 1370 CREEKSIDE BLVDNAPLES, FL 34108---0 CREEKSIDE FLEX I A COMMERCIAL LAND CONDOMINIUM UNIT 229334000045RES FLORIDA 1370 HOLDINGS LLC 1370 CREEKSIDE BLVDNAPLES, FL 34108---0 ARTHREX AT CREEKSIDE-TRACT"A" TRACT A22435011024RES FLORIDA 1370 HOLDINGS LLC 1370 CREEKSIDE BLVDNAPLES, FL 34108---1945 CREEKSIDE COMMERCE PARK WEST UNIT TWO LOT 6, LESS ARTHREX AT CREEK SIDE TRACT A29331193081RES FLORIDA 1370 HOLDINGS LLC 1370 CREEKSIDE BLVDNAPLES, FL 34108---1945 CREEKSIDE COMMERCE PARK WEST UNIT TWO LOT 729331193104RES FLORIDA 1370 HOLDINGS LLC 1370 CREEKSIDE BLVDNAPLES, FL 34108---1945 CREEKSIDE COMMERCE PARK WEST UNIT TWO LOT 829331193120RES FLORIDA 1370 HOLDINGS LLC 1370 CREEKSIDE BLVDNAPLES, FL 34108---1945 CREEKSIDE COMMERCE PARK WEST UNIT TWO LOT 9, LESS THAT PART OF 9 NKA CREEKSIDE FLEX I COMMERCIAL LAND CONDO AS DESC29331193146RES FLORIDA 1370 HOLDINGS LLC 1370 CREEKSIDE BLVDNAPLES, FL 34108---1945 CREEKSIDE FLEX I A COMMERCIAL LAND CONDOMINIUM UNIT 129334000029RIVERCHASE COMMONS OWNERS ASSOCIATION INC PO BOX 8537NAPLES, FL 34101---8537 RIVERCHASE COMMONS TRACT J69586500065S J M J LIMITED PARTNERSHIP 1901 WISHWOOD DR PO BOX 1423WASHINGTON, MO 63090---0 GULFCOAST MEDICAL ARTS CENTER A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 2-C48501000147SARGENT, J. CAROLYN 1345 REMINGTON WAY #4101NAPLES, FL 34110---0 REMINGTON RESERVE A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 40169229000262SCHAFER, HENRY W & JUDITH M 18049 S SHORE LN WEDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55346---3412 REMINGTON RESERVE A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 30169229000181SCRIPPS NP OPERATING LLC % GANNETT TAX DEPT 7950 JONES BRANCH DRMCLEAN, VA 22102---0 27 48 25 COMM NW CNR SEC 27, S 125.02FT, N 44DEG E 34.99FT, S 89DEG E 573.45FT, S 89DEG E 500.61FT, S 89DEG E 768.26FT, 00168048001SCRIPPS NP OPERATING LLC %INTERNATIONAL APPRAISAL110 PLEASANT AVEUPPER SADDLE RIV, NJ 07458---0 27 48 25 FROM NW CNR SEC 27, S125.02 FT, N 45 DEG E 35.08FT, S 89 DEG E 573.46 FT, S 86 DEG E 500.61 FT, S 89 DEG E 147.09 00168040601SINGER, MARK A 5550 HERON POINT DRNAPLES, FL 34108---2868 GULFCOAST MEDICAL ARTS CENTER A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 1-D48501000082SMARG, RICHARD M 1185 IMMOKALEE RD STE 120NAPLES, FL 34110---4806 CITIZENS NATIONAL BANK CENTER A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 12026090000065SNIDER, MARY JOYCE RHONDA COODY KATZMAN 1385 REMINGTON CT #8102NAPLES, FL 34110---0 REMINGTON RESERVE A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 80269229000602SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WOMEN'S GROUP AND BUILDING CO LLC 1890 SW HEALTH PKWY STE 303NAPLES, FL 34109---473 GULFCOAST MEDICAL ARTS CENTER A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 3-B48501000202SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WOMEN'S GROUP BUILDING CO LLC 1890 SW HEALTH PKWY STE 303NAPLES, FL 34109---473 GULFCOAST MEDICAL ARTS CENTER A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 3-C48501000228STELZER, JOHN A & CHRISTINE J 4 ALEXANDER CTBAYPORT, NY 11705---0 REMINGTON RESERVE A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 110369229000864SW FLA WOMENS GROUP COM LLC 1890 SW HEALTH PKWY STE 303NAPLES, FL 34109---473 GULFCOAST MEDICAL ARTS CENTER A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 3-E48501000260SWAMP LLC 3860 PEMBROOKE LANEVESTAL, NY 13850---0 REMINGTON RESERVE A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 110469229000880TORRENS LLC 1890 SW HEALTH PKWY #302NAPLES, FL 34109---0 GULFCOAST MEDICAL ARTS CENTER A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 3-D48501000244TRAIL BOULEVARD LLLP %PARADIGM TAX- ESS #1638 PO BOX 800729DALLAS, TX 75380---0 27 48 25 THAT PORTION LYING S OF IMMOKALEE RD AND ELY OF GOODLETTE FRANK RD AS FURTHER DESC IN OR 4522 PG 381 00168040106TRAIL BOULEVARD LLLP %PARADIGM TAX- ESS #1638 PO BOX 800729DALLAS, TX 75380---0 27 48 25 COMM AT NE CNR SEC 27 S01DEG 09'43"E 1314.62FT, S89 DEG 48'50'W 677.35FT, S05DEG 35'39"E 229.90FT TO POB, S05 00168042706TRONCO, FERNANDO & MICHELA 1315 REMINGTON WAY APT 1101NAPLES, FL 34110---932 REMINGTON RESERVE A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 10369229000068TRONCO, FERNANDO & MICHELA 4N025 WOOD DALE RDADDISON, IL 60101---2963 REMINGTON RESERVE A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 10169229000026TURICCHI, THOMAS E & LEE A 1320 REMINGTON WAY #12201NAPLES, FL 34110---0 REMINGTON RESERVE A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 120369229000945UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE 4000 DEKALB TECHNOLOGY PKWY STE 300ATLANTA, GA 30340---2761 CREEKSIDE COMMERCE PARK WEST UNIT ONE LOT 529331190848VOTH, PETER H & JEANNETTE A 1365 REMINGTON WAY #6202NAPLES, FL 34110---941 REMINGTON RESERVE A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 60469229000482WHITE OAKS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS OF SW FL LLC 1285 CREEKSIDE BLVD ENAPLES, FL 34109---0 CREEKSIDE COMMERCE PARK EAST,PART OF TR 5 DESC AS FOLL; COM AT NE CNR 27-48-25 ALG E LI S01 09 43E 696.85FT, THENCE 29331180612ZAPFEL, RICHARD JOHN 1220 POCANTICO LNNAPLES, FL 34110---923 REMINGTON RESERVE A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 120469229000961REFERENCE ONLY CITIZENS NATIONAL BANK CENTER A CONDOMINIUMRIVERCHASE COMMONS LOT 10 AND 11 NKA CITIZENS NATIONAL BANK CENTER CONDO AS DESC IN OR 3134 PG 1379 69586500447REFERENCE ONLY COLLIER HEALTH PARK CONDOMINIUM A COMMERCIAL LAND CONDOMINIUMCOLLIER HEALTH PARK, THAT PORTION OF TRACT B AS DESC IN OR 5244 PG 1526 NKA COLLIER HEALTH PARK CONDO- 27167500206REFERENCE ONLY CREEKSIDE CORNERS CONDOMINIUM A COMMERCIAL LAND CONDOMINIUMCREEKSIDE COMMERCE PARK EAST, THAT PART OF TRACT 5 NKA CREEKSIDE CORNERS CONDO, A COMMERCIAL LAND29331180625REFERENCE ONLY CREEKSIDE EAST LAND CONDOMINIUMCREEKSIDE COMMERCE PARK EAST THAT PORTION OF TRACT 3 NKA CREEKSIDE EAST LAND CONDO AS DESC IN OR 5057 PG 2811 29331180104REFERENCE ONLY CREEKSIDE FLEX I A COMMERCIAL LAND CONDOMINIUMCREEKSIDE COMMERCE PARK WEST UNIT TWO LOT 10 AND A PORTION OF LOT 9 NKS CREEKSIDE FLEX I COMMERCIAL LAND CONDO AS DESC29331193162REFERENCE ONLY GULFCOAST MEDICAL ARTS CENTER A CONDOMINIUMSOUTHWEST PROFESSIONAL HEALTH PARK TRACT B4 NKA GULFCOAST MEDICAL ARTS CENTER CONDO AS DESC IN OR 2644 PG 551 & OR 74445101309REFERENCE ONLY NOW SEE PELICAN MARSH GOLF COURSE PH TWO TR GC1 PAR 1 FOLIO# 66679351250BENTGRASS BEND AT THE ESTATES AT BAY COLONY GOLF CLUB TRACT B23932000045REFERENCE ONLY NOW SEE PELICAN MARSH GOLF COURSE PH TWO TR GC1 PAR 1 FOLIO# 66679351250PELICAN MARSH GOLF COURSE PHASE THREE TRACT 3, LESS THAT PORTION DESC IN OR 2139 PG 646 66679360759REFERENCE ONLY NOW SEE PELICAN MARSH GOLF COURSE PH TWO TRACT GC-1 PCL 1 FOLIO 66679351250PELICAN MARSH GOLF COURSE PHASE THREE TRACT GC1 B66679361363REFERENCE ONLY NOW SEE PELICAN MARSH GOLF COURSE PH TWO TRACT GC-1 PCL-1 FOLIO# 66679351250PELICAN MARSH GOLF COURSE PHASE THREE THAT PORTION OF TR GC1 AS DESC IN OR 2147 PG 712 (PORTION OF BAY COLONY GOLF 66679361321REFERENCE ONLY REMINGTON RESERVE A CONDOMINIUMCOLLIER'S RESERVE THAT PORTION OF TR "I" NKA REMINGTON RESERVE CONDO (PH 1) AS DESC IN OR 4093 PG 1474 AS 27185002605REFERENCE ONLY ROYAL PALM BUILDING A CONDOMINIUMNORTH NAPLES MEDICAL PARK LOT 8 & 9 N/K/A ROYAL PALM BUILDING CONDO AS DESC IN OR 2396 PG 2708 64280000549REFERENCE ONLY RUBELL MEDICAL CENTER CONDO A COMMERCIAL LAND CONDOMINIUMSOUTHWEST PROFESSIONAL HEALTH PARK TRACT B2, NKA RUBELL MEDICAL CENTER CONDOMINIUM A COMMERCIAL LAND CONDOMINIUM 74445101008BERECZKI, CSABA F 16 SONNY STMAPLE L6A 1C1 CANADA REMINGTON RESERVE A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 90269229000686SCOFIELD, GRAHAM PATRICIA ANN SCOFIELD 2 STRATHMORE HOUSE 11 QUEEN MOTHER SQUARE POUNDBURY, DORSE DT13DX UNITED KINGDOM REMINGTON RESERVE A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 90169229000660SIEKIERSKI, WILLIAM 104 - 11 DURHAM PRIVATEOTTAWA K1M 2H6 CANADA REMINGTON RESERVE A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 110269229000848PELICAN MARSH FOUNDATION1504 PELICAN MARSH BOULEVARDNAPLES, FL 34109REMINGTON RESERVE CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC. 3050 N. HORSESHOE DR. STE. 172NAPLES, FL 34104POList_500_PL20190002849-PL20190002850.xls9.A.3.cPacket Pg. 923Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) 12A |THURSDAY, DECEMBER 17, 2020 |NAPLES DAILY NEWS + *Financing with approved credit.Interest accrues at time of purchase unless paid in full during promotional period.For regular term purchases,APR is based on US prime rate and is subject to change.Monthly payments required. FUN FA CT:FUN FA CT: Po wer failurePowerfailure is notisnot caused by forgetting Santa’sSanta’s Cookies ONLYONLY KEEP THEKEEPTHE LIGHTSLIGHTS ONON WITHWITH GENERACGENERAC AUTOMATIC STANDBY GENERATOR AIR CONDITIONING ELECTRICAL PLUMBING DRAINS forfor CC NONO manual starts |extension cords |gas can refilling |noisy machines |deadly fumes A Generac®automatic standby home generator can keep you comfortable during unexpected power interruptions.The generator provides hands-free operation that automatically starts within seconds of a power outage,and turns off when utility power returns,so there is no need to monitor the unit during an outage.These machines are compatible for use with the sensitive home electronics and appliances. If your family relies on continuous electrical power for critical medical equipment,standby generators are literally life-savers. 24/7 EMERGENCY SERVICE NO OVERTIME CHARGES! Call us today to schedule your service! 239-558-1895 NAPLES FT.MYERS BONITA SPRINGS CAPE CORAL ESTERO MARCO ISLAND Coupon must be presented at time of purchase.Prices vary by model.All prices are final at point of sale. All sales are final.Cannot be combined with any other offers or promotions. EXPIRES DECEMBER 31,2020 Coupon must be presented at time of purchase.Prices vary by model.All prices are final at point of sale. All sales are final.Cannot be combined with any other offers or promotions. EXPIRES DECEMBER 31,2020 ND-GCI0542407-02 NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING Petitions PL20190002849 Creekside Commerce Park East Mixed Use Subdistrict (GMPA)and PL20190002850,Creekside Commerce Park PUD Amendment (PUDA) A Neighborhood Information Meeting hosted by D.Wa yne Arnold,AICP, of Q.Grady Minor and Associates,P.A.and Richard D.Yo vanovich,Esq. of Coleman,Yo vanovich &Koester,P.A.,representing Creekside East,Inc. (Applicant)will be held on Wednesday,January 6,2021,5:30 pm at Saint Monica’s Episcopal Church,7070 Immokalee Road,Naples,FL 34119. Individuals who would like to participate remotely or have questions or comments should contact Sharon Umpenhour,Senior Planning Te chnician with Q.Grady Minor &Associates,P.A.by email:sumpenhour@gradyminor. com,phone:239-947-1144,or mail:3800 Via Del Rey,Bonita Springs, FL 34134.Project information is posted online at www.gradyminor.com/ planning. Creekside East,Inc.has submitted formal applications to Collier County, seeking approval of a Small-Scale Growth Management Plan (GMP) Amendment and a Planned Unit Development (PUD)Amendment.The GMP amendment proposes to revise the Future Land Use Element to create the Creekside Commerce Park East Mixed Use Subdistrict.The plan amendment establishes a maximum of 300 multi-family rental units to be constructed in the 9.9±acre subdistrict,which will be located on the east side Goodlette- Frank Road within the ‘B’District of the Creekside Commerce Park PUD. The companion PUD amendment proposes to amend the Creekside Commerce Park PUD to construct a maximum of 300 multi-family dwelling units east of Goodlette-Frank Road as a development option.The addition of the residential use is to the ‘B’District within the PUD.The maximum vehicular trip generation figure in Section 2.16.L has not been revised with the addition of the multi-family residential use because the PUD proposes no change to the previously established trip cap.The Conceptual PUD Master Plan has been modified to show the Creekside Commerce Park East Mixed Use Subdistrict located east of Goodlette-Frank Road. The GMP amendment subject property is comprised of approximately 9.9± acres,located within the Creekside Commerce Park PUD east of Goodlette- Frank Road.The Creekside Commerce Park PUD is comprised of 106± acres,located on the southwest and southeast quadrant of Immokalee Road and Goodlette-Frank Road in Section 27,To wnship 48 South,Range 25 East,Collier County,Florida. The Neighborhood Information Meeting is for informational purposes,it is not a public hearing. Man guilty of pretending to be immigration attorney TAMPA – A Florida man has been convicted of pretending to be an attor- ney and filing hundreds of fake immi- gration applications. Elvis Harold Reyes, 56, pleaded guilty Tuesday in Tampa federal court to mail fraud and aggravated identity theft, ac- cording to court records. He faces up to 20 years in prison for the mail fraud and a mandatory consecutive 2 years for the identity theft. A sentencing date hasn’t been set. According to court documents, Reyes owned and operated EHR Ministries Inc. He portrayed himself as an immi- gration attorney, though he has never had a law license. Florida man is bitten by shark, walks home bleeding SIESTA KEY – A Florida man was bit- ten by a shark and walked home bleed- ing where a woman called 911 and had him taken to a hospital. News outlets reported the man was swimming in the waters off Siesta Key when the attack happened. WTVT reported a woman called 911 and said the 39-year-old man had been bitten on his hand and arm and was bleeding profusely. She was heard reas- suring him “everything’s going to be OK.” Sarasota Memorial Hospital spokes- man Kim Savage said a man had been admitted Tuesday and the wound was confirmed to have been a shark bite, but she said she could not provide any more details on his condition or personal in- formation. Man sentenced to 50 years for stabbing mom to death PALM COAST – A Florida man was sentenced to 50 years in prison Wednesday for stabbing his mother to death after he got angry when she threatened to kick him out of the house. Nathaniel Shimmel, 25, pleaded guilty to second-degree murder Wednesday after facing a first-degree murder charge and the possibility of life in prison. On Aug. 23, 2017, Shimmel called 911 and initially said a robber had attacked her, but later confessed to the crime de- scribing the events in vivid detail. Associated Press STATE BRIEFS TALLAHASSEE – Red tide is back in the waters off of Florida’s southwest coast, making birds sick and killing fish, according to a state environmental agency update on Wednesday. While satellite imagery isn’t picking up the toxic algal blooms, the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Com- mission said it’s been detected in the waters between Sanibel Island and Marco Island. Officials said recent tests that were done on sea birds alerted officials. “Our first indication of this particular event was we had over a dozen cormo- rants that came into a wildlife rehab center on Sanibel and we tested blood from those cormorants and all of them tested positive for the red tide toxin,” Gil McRae, director of the agency’s Fish and Wildlife Research Institute, told com- mission members during a virtual meet- ing. McRae said it was a late season bloom, and that winter weather could likely break it up, but in the meantime the state, local governments and volun- teers are trying to identify what areas are being affected. “We are ramping up every available resource to respond to this red tide,” McRae said. “As of right now it doesn’t appear to be nearly as large scale as the ones we’ve seen in the recent past.” The toxic bloom overran Florida’s southern Gulf Coast in 2018, killing huge numbers of fish along with scores of sea turtles and the state’s beloved mana- tees. The bloom also causes respiratory irritations in people which, coupled with the stench of rotting marine life, sent many tourists fleeing beaches, sea- side attractions and nearby restaurants. Red tide is caused by an organism called Karenia brevis, which occurs nat- urally in the waters off Florida. In an av- erage year, a red tide may bloom in the fall and run its course through the win- ter months. Red tide found off state’ssouthwest coast; birds sick Brendan Farrington ASSOCIATED PRESS 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 924 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) Transcript - PL20190002849 Creekside Commerce Park East Mixed Use Subdistrict (GMPA) and PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUD Amendment (PUDA) January 6, 2021 NIM Page 1 of 1 The meeting was scheduled for Wednesday, January 6, 2021, 5:30 pm at Saint Monica’s Episcopal Church, 7070 Immokalee Road, Naples, FL 34119. No members of the public were present or registered through Zoom, therefore the meeting was not held. 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 925 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) 9.A.3.c Packet Pg. 926 Attachment: PL20190002849 Sept 16 2021 CCPC Backup (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) 9.A.3.d Packet Pg. 927 Attachment: Ltr. of Support to BCC - Creekside Apt. Complex (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) 9.A.3.e Packet Pg. 928 Attachment: NCH - Signed (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) 9.A.3.fPacket Pg. 929Attachment: CCPC-BCC Hybrid Meeting Waiver (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) ND-GCI0711612-01 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the Collier County Planning Commis- sion (CCPC)at 9:00 A.M.,September 16,2021,in the Board of County Commissioners Meeting Room,Third Floor,Collier Government Center,3299 East Ta miami Trail,Naples,FL,to consider: AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA AMENDING ORDINANCE NO.89-05,AS AMENDED,THE COL- LIER COUNTY GROW TH MANAG EMENT PLAN FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA,SPECIFICALLY AMENDING THE RURAL GOLDEN GATE ESTAT ES SUB-ELEMENT OF THE GOLDEN GATE AREA MAS- TER PLAN ELEMENT AND RU RAL GOLDEN GATE ESTAT ES FUTURE LAND USE MAP AND MAP SERIES;BY AMENDING THE ESTAT ES-MIXED USE DISTRICT TO ADD THE 8TH STREET NE-22ND AV ENUE NE SUBDISTRICT TO ALLOW A 100-SEAT CHURCH AS A CONDITIONAL USE.THE SUBJECT PROPERTY CONSISTS OF 5.15± AC RES AND IS LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF 8TH STREET NE AND 22ND AV ENUE NE IN SECTION 27,TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH,RANGE 27 EAST,COL- LIER COUNTY,FLORIDA;AND FURTHERMORE,DIRECTING TRANSMITTAL OF THE ADOPTED AMENDMENT TO THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY;PROV IDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND PROV IDING FOR AN EF- FECTIVE DATE.[PL20190001333] AND A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA PROV IDING FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A CONDITIONAL USE TO ALLOW A 100-SEAT CHURCH WITHIN AN ESTAT ES (E)ZONING DISTRICT PURSU- ANT TO SECTION 2.03.01.B.1.c.1 OF THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE FOR A 5.15±AC RE PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF 8TH STREET NE AND 22ND AV ENUE NE IN SECTION 27,TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 27 EAST,COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA.[PL20190001326]WilsonBLVDNIm mo ka le e RD RANDALL BLVD !I Project Location 8thSTNE22nd AV E NE All interested parties are invited to appear and be heard.Copies of the proposed ordinance and resolution will be made available for inspection at the Collier County Clerk’s Office,Fo urth Floor, Collier County Government Center,3299 East Ta miami Trail,Suite 401,Naples,FL,one we ek prior to the scheduled hearing.Written comments must be filed with the Zoning Division,Zoning Services Section,prior to September 16,2021. As part of an ongoing initiative to promote social distancing during the COVID-19 pandemic,the public will have the opportunity to provide public comments remotely,as well as in person,during this proceeding.Individuals who wo uld like to participate remotely,should register any time after the agenda is posted on the County website which is 6 days before the meeting through the link pro- vided on the front page of the County website at www.colliercountyfl.gov.Individuals who register will receive an email in advance of the public hearing detailing how they can participate remotely in this meeting.For additional information about the meeting,please call Thomas Clarke at (239) 252-2526 or email to CCPCRemoteParticipation@CollierCountyFL.gov. Any person who decides to appeal any decision of the Collier County Planning Commission will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto and therefore,may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made,which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is based.If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommoda- tion in order to participate in this proceeding,you are entitled,at no cost to you,to the provision of certain assistance.Please contact the Collier County Fa cilities Management Division,located at 3335 Ta miami Trail East,Suite 101,Naples,FL 34112-5356,(239)252-8380,at least two days prior to the meeting.Assisted listening devices for the hearing impaired are available in the Board of County Commissioners Office. Collier County Planning Commission Edwin Fryer,Chairman 9.A.3.g Packet Pg. 930 Attachment: Ad Proof ND-GCI0711612-01 (19897 : PL20190002849 GMP Amendment -Creekside Subdistrict) 09/16/2021 COLLIER COUNTY Collier County Planning Commission Item Number: 9.A.4 Item Summary: PL20190002850 PUDA Creekside Commerce Park - An Ordinance of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida amending Ordinance Number 2006-50, the Creekside Commerce Park Commercial Planned Unit Development (CPUD), as amended, by adding up to 300 multi-family rental dwelling units as a permitted use in the business district; adding residential development standards including a maximum height of 100 feet; and by amending the master plan. The subject multi-family property is in the southeast quadrant of the intersection of Immokalee Road and Goodlette Frank Road, consisting of 28.85± acres and the CPUD is located south of Immokalee Road and both east and west of Goodlette Frank Road in Section 27, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida; and by providing an effective date. (Companion Item PL20190002849 GMPA) [Coordinator: Nancy Gundlach, AICP, PLA, Principal Planner] Meeting Date: 09/16/2021 Prepared by: Title: Planner, Principal – Zoning Name: Nancy Gundlach 08/26/2021 1:39 PM Submitted by: Title: – Zoning Name: Mike Bosi 08/26/2021 1:39 PM Approved By: Review: Growth Management Operations & Regulatory Management Donna Guitard Review Item Completed 08/26/2021 4:43 PM Planning Commission Diane Lynch Review item Completed 08/27/2021 2:37 PM Zoning Mike Bosi Zoning Director Review Completed 08/27/2021 3:30 PM Zoning Ray Bellows Additional Reviewer Completed 08/27/2021 3:50 PM Growth Management Department James C French GMD Deputy Dept Head Completed 08/28/2021 1:23 AM Planning Commission Edwin Fryer Meeting Pending 09/16/2021 9:00 AM 9.A.4 Packet Pg. 931 CREEKSIDE COMMERCE PARK CPUD, PUDA-PL20190002850 August 27, 2021 Page 1 of 15 STAFF REPORT TO: COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: ZONING DIVISION – ZONING SERVICES SECTION GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT - PLANNING & REGULATION HEARING DATE: SEPTEMBER 16, 2021 SUBJECT: PUDA-PL20190002850, CREEKSIDE COMMERCE PARK COMMERCIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (CPUD), COMPANION TO PL20190002849, CREEKSIDE COMMERCE PARK GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN AMENDMENT (GMPA) ______________________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT: Creekside East, Inc 2600 Golden Gate Parkway Naples, FL 34105 AGENTS: D. Wayne Arnold, AICP Richard D. Yovanovich, Esquire Q. Grady Minor and Associates, P.A. Coleman, Yovanovich & Koester, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey 4001 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 300 Bonita Springs, FL 34134 Naples, FL 34103 REQUESTED ACTION: The petitioner requests that the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) consider amending Ordinance Number 2006-50, the Creekside Commerce Park Commercial Planned Unit Development (CPUD), as amended, by adding up to 300 multi-family rental dwelling units as a permitted use in the business district; adding residential development standards including a maximum height of 100 feet; and by amending the Master Plan. 9.A.4.a Packet Pg. 932 Attachment: STAFF REPORT Creekside 8-27-21 (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) CREEKSIDE COMMERCE PARK CPUD, PUDA-PL20190002850 August 27, 2021 Page 2 of 15 9.A.4.a Packet Pg. 933 Attachment: STAFF REPORT Creekside 8-27-21 (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) CREEKSIDE COMMERCE PARK CPUD, PUDA-PL20190002850 August 27, 2021 Page 3 of 15 9.A.4.a Packet Pg. 934 Attachment: STAFF REPORT Creekside 8-27-21 (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) CREEKSIDE COMMERCE PARK CPUD, PUDA-PL20190002850 August 27, 2021 Page 4 of 15 GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The subject multi-family property is in the southeast quadrant of the intersection of Immokalee Road and Goodlette Frank Road, consisting of 28.85 acres, and the CPUD is located south of Immokalee Road and both east and west of Goodlette-Frank Road (CR 851) in Section 27, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. (Please see the Location Map on page 2 of this Staff Report.) PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The Creekside Commerce Park Planned Unit Development (PUD) was originally approved in Ordinance Number 97-51 on October 21, 1997. There was a subsequent ordinance, Ordinance Number 06-41, which was repealed along with Ordinance Number 97-51 with the adoption of Ordinance Number: 06-50 on October 24, 2006. There have been three amendments to Ordinance Number 06-50 since, Ordinance numbers 13-23, 16-05, 16-32, and 18-19. The petitioner is proposing to amend the eastern portion of the Creekside Commerce Park CPUD, in the Business (B) district, to add 300 multi-family dwelling units on 9.9 acres on the east side of Goodlette-Frank Road. A companion small-scale Growth Management Plan amendment (PL 20190002849) is also proposed, the Creekside Commerce Park East Mixed-Use Subdistrict, to authorize the proposed multi-family dwelling units at this location. The petitioner is now proposing the following changes with this amendment: • Add 300 multi-family dwelling units to the Business district; • Add multi-family residential development standards; • Add a parking structure to support the dwelling units on Tract 9; and • A landscape deviation to allow for no landscape buffer between the proposed residential development and the existing commercial development. The Master Plan has been revised to show the location of the proposed residential area within the proposed Mixed-Use Subdistrict area. For further information, see Attachment A-Proposed PUD Ordinance. SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING: North: Immokalee Road, then (Collier’s Reserve), 506 acres of mixed-use: 61.4 acres commercial, 385 residential units, with a zoning designation of Collier Tract 22 PUD; and a 61 acre professional center (North Collier Hospital), with a zoning designation of Collier Health Center PUD East: Collier County Utilities Division Water Plant, with a zoning designation of Industrial; a 17.74 acre commercial and medical park, with a zoning designation of Southwest Professional Health Park PUD South: Collier County Utilities Division Water Plant, with a zoning designation of Industrial; and 2,104 acres of mixed-use: 80 acres commercial/industrial, 8,600 residential units, 4.26 9.A.4.a Packet Pg. 935 Attachment: STAFF REPORT Creekside 8-27-21 (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) CREEKSIDE COMMERCE PARK CPUD, PUDA-PL20190002850 August 27, 2021 Page 5 of 15 units per acre, with a zoning designation of Pelican Marsh DRI (Development of Regional Impact) West: 35.24 acre Business Park, with a zoning designation of The Naples Daily News BPUD (Business Park PUD) AERIAL PHOTO GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN (GMP) CONSISTENCY: Comprehensive Planning staff has reviewed the proposed PUD Amendment. and has found it consistent with the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) of the GMP. The subject site is designated Urban, Urban Mixed Use District, Urban Residential Subdistrict. The site is zoned Creekside Commerce Park CPUD. SUBJECT PROPERTY 9.A.4.a Packet Pg. 936 Attachment: STAFF REPORT Creekside 8-27-21 (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) CREEKSIDE COMMERCE PARK CPUD, PUDA-PL20190002850 August 27, 2021 Page 6 of 15 Transportation Element: In evaluating this project, staff reviewed the applicant’s June 18, 2020, TIS and revised PUD Document for consistency with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the Growth Management Plan (GMP. Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the GMP states; “The County Commission shall review all rezone petitions, SRA designation applications, conditional use petitions, and proposed amendments to the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) affecting the overall countywide density or intensity of permissible development, with consideration of their impact on the overall County transportation system, and shall not approve any petition or application that would directly access a deficient roadway segment as identified in the current AUIR or if it impacts an adjacent roadway segment that is deficient as identified in the current AUIR, or which significantly impacts a roadway segment or adjacent roadway segment that is currently operating and/or is projected to operate below an adopted Level of Service Standard within the five-year AUIR planning period, unless specific mitigating stipulations are also approved. A petition or application has significant impacts if the traffic impact statement reveals that any of the following occur: a. For links (roadway segments) directly accessed by the project where project traffic is equal to or exceeds 2% of the adopted LOS standard service volume; b. For links adjacent to links directly accessed by the project where project traffic is equal to or exceeds 2% of the adopted LOS standard service volume; and c. For all other links the project traffic is considered to be significant up to the point where it is equal to or exceeds 3% of the adopted LOS standard service volume. Mitigating stipulations shall be based upon a mitigation plan prepared by the applicant and submitted as part of the traffic impact statement that addresses the project’s significant impacts on all roadways.” Staff finding: According to the TIS and revised PUD document the proposed change will allow up to 300 multi-family residential units within the Creekside Commerce Park development. The TIS for this request includes scenarios for both the currently approved PUD uses and those proposed with this amendment request. The scenarios indicate that there will be no net increase or decrease in the number of trips generated by this development. Staff further notes that the current trip cap in section 2.16.L of the PUD document is not changing, thereby retaining the same maximum number of trips allowed by this development. Based on the TIS and the revised PUD, the subject petition request can be found consistent with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the Growth Management Plan because no additional traffic impacts are resulting from the proposed changes. Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME): Environmental Planning staff found this project to be consistent with the CCME. The proposed changes do not affect any of the environmental requirements of the GMP. 9.A.4.a Packet Pg. 937 Attachment: STAFF REPORT Creekside 8-27-21 (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) CREEKSIDE COMMERCE PARK CPUD, PUDA-PL20190002850 August 27, 2021 Page 7 of 15 GMP Conclusion: The subject PUD amendment petition may only be deemed consistent with the FLUE of the GMP if the companion PL20190002849/CPSS-20-4 Creekside Commerce Park GMPA is approved. STAFF ANALYSIS: Staff completed a comprehensive evaluation of this land use petition including the criteria upon which a recommendation must be based, specifically noted in Land Development Code (LDC) Subsection 10.02.13 B.5., Planning Commission Recommendation (commonly referred to as the “PUD Findings”), and Subsection 10.02.08 F., Nature of Requirements of Planning Commission Report (referred to as “Rezone Findings”), which establish the legal basis to support the CCPC’s recommendation. The CCPC uses these same criteria as the basis for their recommendation to the Board of Collier County Commissioners (BCC), who in turn use the criteria to support their action on the rezoning request. An evaluation relative to these subsections is discussed below, under the heading “Zoning and Land Development Review Analysis.” In addition, staff offers the following analysis: Environmental Review: Environmental Planning staff has reviewed the PUD petition to address environmental concerns. The proposed PUD changes will not affect any of the environmental requirements of the PUD document (Ordinance 06-50). A minimum of 7 acres of native vegetation has been placed under preservation and dedicated to Collier County (PB 54, Pages 84 - 86). This project does not require Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) review, as this project did not meet the EAC scope of land development project reviews as identified in Section 2-1193 of the Collier County Codes of Laws and Ordinances. Environmental Services staff recommends approval of the proposed petition. Transportation Review: Transportation Planning staff has reviewed the petition for compliance with the GMP and the LDC and recommends approval. Utilities Review: The project lies within the regional potable water service area and the north wastewater service area of the Collier County Water-Sewer District (CCWSD). The PUD already receives potable water and wastewater services from the CCWSD, and existing utility infrastructure is readily available for further development of Tracts 8 and 9. Adequate downstream wastewater system capacity must be confirmed at the time of development permit (SDP or PPL) review through a thorough engineering analysis, which will be dis cussed at a mandatory pre-submittal conference with representatives from the Public Utilities Engineering and Project Management Division and the Growth Management Development Review Division. Any improvements to the Collier County Water-Sewer District’s wastewater collection/transmission system necessary to provide sufficient capacity to serve the project will be the responsibility of the owner/developer and will be conveyed to the Collier County Water-Sewer District at no cost to the County at the time of utility acceptance. School Board Review: At this time, there is existing or planned capacity within the next five years for the proposed development at the elementary, middle, and high school levels. At the time of Site 9.A.4.a Packet Pg. 938 Attachment: STAFF REPORT Creekside 8-27-21 (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) CREEKSIDE COMMERCE PARK CPUD, PUDA-PL20190002850 August 27, 2021 Page 8 of 15 Development Plan (SDP) or Plans and Plat (PPL), the development would be reviewed for concurrency to ensure there is capacity either within the concurrency service area the development is located within or in adjacent concurrency service areas. Landscape Review: Landscape staff has reviewed the petition, the PUD Document, and the Master Plan and is recommending approval. Zoning and Land Development Review: The Creekside Commerce Park CPUD is an established commerce park, which has been substantially developed and approved for 709,100 square feet of industrial/commercial uses, 269,000 square feet of business district uses, a 400 bed assisted living facility, and 349 hotel rooms. The amendment to the Creekside Commerce Park CPUD proposes to add 300 multi-family dwelling units to the Business (B) District within the PUD. The proposed additional 300 units will be located on the east side of Goodlette-Frank Road on Tract 8 and a related proposed parking structure will be located on Tract 9. (Refer to Master Plan on page 3 of this Staff Report.) Development of the multifamily dwellings will be similar to most of the previously approved PUD Development Standards. The proposed zoned building height of 95 feet and actual height of 122 feet is within the range of the previously approved heights of 75 and 85 feet for non-residential development in the Business District and 104 and 122 feet for the recently constructed hotel across the street and west of Goodlette-Frank Road. The Conceptual Master Plan has been revised to show the location of the proposed Mixed-use District and to note the proposed landscape buffer deviation. Zoning staff finds the proposed multi-family residential and proposed landscape deviation to be compatible with the existing Commercial/Industrial District and Business District land uses and intensities. For further information regarding the landscape deviation, please see the Deviation section of this Staff Report. REZONE FINDINGS: Staff completed a comprehensive evaluation of this land use petition including the criteria upon which a recommendation must be based, specifically noted in LDC Subsection 10.02.13 B.5., Planning Commission Recommendation (commonly referred to as the “PUD Findings”), and Subsection 10.02.08 F., Nature of Requirements of Planning Commission Report (referred to as “Rezone Findings”), which establish the legal bases to support the CCPC’s recommendation. The CCPC uses these same criteria as the basis for their recommendation to the BCC, who in turn use the criteria to support their action on the rezoning request. An evaluation relative to these subsections is discussed below, under the heading “Zoning and Land Development Review Analysis.” In addition, staff offers the following analysis: 9.A.4.a Packet Pg. 939 Attachment: STAFF REPORT Creekside 8-27-21 (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) CREEKSIDE COMMERCE PARK CPUD, PUDA-PL20190002850 August 27, 2021 Page 9 of 15 1. Whether the proposed change will be consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies and future land use map, and the elements of the GMP. Upon adoption of the companion GMPA, Comprehensive Planning staff has indicated that the proposed PUD Amendment can be found consistent with all applicable elements of the GMP. 2. The existing land use pattern. As described in the “Surrounding Land Use and Zoning” portion of this report and discussed in the zoning review analysis, the neighborhood’s existing land use pattern can be characterized as residential, commercial, industrial, and institutional lands. 3. The possible creation of an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts. At the time the subject property was rezoned to a CPUD, it was deemed to be of sufficient size and did not result in an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts. The proposed PUD Amendment does not change this finding. 4. Whether existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the property proposed for change. The district boundaries are logically drawn as discussed in Items 2 and 3. 5. Whether changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed amendment necessary. The proposed change is not necessary, but it is being requested in compliance with the LDC provisions to seek such changes because the petitioner wishes to add multi-family residences. 6. Whether the proposed change will adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood. Staff is of the opinion that the proposed PUD Amendment can be deemed consistent with the County’s land-use policies upon adoption of the companion GMP. Development in compliance with the proposed PUD rezone should not adversely impact living conditions in the area. 7. Whether the proposed change will create or excessively increase traffic congestion or create types of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses, because of peak volumes or projected types of vehicular traffic, including activity during construction phases of the development, or otherwise affect public safety. The roadway infrastructure will continue to have adequate capacity to serve the proposed project at this time, i.e., GMP consistent at the time of rezoning as evaluated as part of the GMP Transportation Element consistency review. Operational impacts will be addressed at the time of each development order (SDP or Plat). Additionally, the project’s development must comply with all other applicable concurrency management regulations when development approvals are sought. 9.A.4.a Packet Pg. 940 Attachment: STAFF REPORT Creekside 8-27-21 (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) CREEKSIDE COMMERCE PARK CPUD, PUDA-PL20190002850 August 27, 2021 Page 10 of 15 8. Whether the proposed change will create a drainage problem. The proposed PUD Amendment will not create a drainage problem. Furthermore, the project is subject to the requirements of Collier County and the South Florida Water Management District. 9. Whether the proposed change will seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas. The proposed PUD Amendment will not reduce light and air to adjacent areas outside the PUD. Furthermore, the PUD Document provides adequate property development regulations to ensure light and air should not be seriously reduced to adjacent areas. The Master Plan further demonstrates that the locations of proposed preserve and open space areas should further ensure light and air should not be seriously reduced to adjacent areas. 10. Whether the proposed change would adversely affect property values in the adjacent area. Staff is of the opinion this PUD Amendment will not adversely impact property values. 11. Whether the proposed change will be a deterrent to the improvement or development of adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations. Properties around this property are already mostly developed. The basic premise underlying all of the development standards in the Land Development Code is that their sound application, when combined with the site development plan approval process and/or subdivision process, gives reasonable assurance that a change in zoning will not result in deterrence to improvement or development of the adjacent property. Therefore, the proposed zoning change should not be a deterrent to the improvement of adjacent properties. 12. Whether the proposed change will constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual owner as contrasted with the public welfare. The development complies with the GMP, which is a public policy statement supporting zoning actions when they are consistent with said Comprehensive Plan. In light of this fact, the proposed amendment does not constitute a grant of special privilege. Consistency with the FLUE is further determined to be a public welfare relationship because actions consistent with plans are in the public interest. 13. Whether there are substantial reasons why the property cannot be used in accordance with existing zoning. The subject property could be developed within the parameters of the existing zoning designations; however, the petitioner is seeking this PUD Amendment in compliance with LDC provisions. The proposed amendment meets the intent of the PUD district, and the public interest will be maintained. 9.A.4.a Packet Pg. 941 Attachment: STAFF REPORT Creekside 8-27-21 (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) CREEKSIDE COMMERCE PARK CPUD, PUDA-PL20190002850 August 27, 2021 Page 11 of 15 14. Whether the change suggested is out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the county. Staff is of the opinion that the proposed PUD Amendment is not out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or County. 15. Whether it is impossible to find other adequate sites in the county for the proposed use in districts already permitting such use. There may be other sites in the County that could accommodate the uses proposed; however, this is not the determining factor when evaluating the appropriateness of a zoning decision. The petition was reviewed on its merit for compliance with the GMP and the LDC, and staff does not review other sites in conjunction with a specific petition. 16. The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site alteration which would be required to make the property usable for any of the range of potential uses under the proposed zoning classification. Any development anticipated by the PUD Document would require site alteration, and this project will undergo extensive evaluation relative to all federal, state, and local development regulations during the site development plan approval process and again later as part of the building permit process. 17. The impact of development on the availability of adequate public facilities and services consistent with the levels of service adopted in the Collier County GMP and as defined and implemented through the Collier County adequate public facilities ordinance. The development will have to meet all applicable criteria set forth in the LDC regarding Adequate Public Facilities. The project must also be consistent with all applicable goals and objectives of the GMP regarding adequate public facilities. This petition has been reviewed by County staff that is responsible for jurisdictional elements of the GMP as part of the rezoning process, and that staff has concluded that no Level of Service will be adversely impacted. 18. Such other factors, standards, or criteria that the Board of County Commissioners shall deem important in the protection of the public health, safety, and welfare. To be determined by the BCC during its advertised public hearing. PUD FINDINGS: LDC Section 10.02.13.B.5 states that, “In support of its recommendation, the CCPC shall make findings as to the PUD Master Plan’s compliance with the following criteria.” 9.A.4.a Packet Pg. 942 Attachment: STAFF REPORT Creekside 8-27-21 (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) CREEKSIDE COMMERCE PARK CPUD, PUDA-PL20190002850 August 27, 2021 Page 12 of 15 1. The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer, water, and other utilities. The Creekside Commerce Park PUD is an established business park that has been developed with a variety of light industrial, commercial, and office uses. The proposed multi-family residential use is compatible with the existing development within the Creekside Commerce Park. The PUD already receives potable water and wastewater services from the CCWSD, and there are adequate water and wastewater treatment capacities available for future development as proposed by this petition. Therefore, the site is suitable for the proposed development. 2. Adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of any proposed agreements, contract, or other instruments, or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense. Documents submitted with the application provided satisfactory evidence of unified control. Additionally, the development will be required to gain platting and/or site development plan approval. These processes will ensure that appropriate stipulations for the provision of, continuing operation of, and maintenance of infrastructure will be provided by the developer. 3. Conformity of the proposed Planned Unit Development with the goals, objectives, and policies of the GMP. Upon adoption of the companion GMPA, Comprehensive Planning staff has indicated that the proposed PUD Amendment can be found consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the GMP. County staff has reviewed this petition and has found this petition consistent with the overall GMP upon adoption of the companion GMPA. 4. The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include restrictions on the location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening requirements. The currently approved development, landscaping, and buffering standards were determined to be compatible with the adjacent uses and with the use mixture within the project itself at the time the PUD was approved. Staff believes that this amendment will not change the project’s compatibility, both internally and externally, with the proposed residential land use along with the proposed deviation. 5. The adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the development. The amount of open space set aside for this project meets the minimum requirement of the LDC. 9.A.4.a Packet Pg. 943 Attachment: STAFF REPORT Creekside 8-27-21 (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) CREEKSIDE COMMERCE PARK CPUD, PUDA-PL20190002850 August 27, 2021 Page 13 of 15 6. The timing or sequence of development for the purpose of assuring the adequacy of available improvements and facilities, both public and private. The roadway infrastructure will continue to be sufficient to serve the proposed project, as noted in the Transportation Element consistency review. Operational impacts will be addressed at the time of each development order (SDP or Plat), at which time a new TIS will be required to demonstrate turning movements for all site access points. Finally, the project’s development must comply with all other applicable concurrency management regulations when development approvals, including but not limited to any plats and or site development plans, are sought. Pursuant to Sec. 134-57(a) of the Collier County Code of Ordinances, availability of potable water and wastewater services must be verified in writing by the CCWSD prior to submittal of construction documents. No public utility facility adequacy issues are anticipated at this time. 7. The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion. The area has adequate supporting infrastructure, including Collier County Water-Sewer District potable water and wastewater mains, to accommodate this project. Furthermore, adequate public facilities requirements will be addressed when development approvals are sought. 8. Conformity with PUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the particular case, based on determination that such modifications are justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations. This criterion essentially requires an evaluation of the extent to which development standards and deviations proposed for this PUD depart from development standards that would be required for the most similar conventional zoning district. The petitioner is seeking one new deviation to allow design flexibility in compliance with the purpose and intent of the Planned Unit Development Districts (LDC Section 2.03.06 A.). Staff believes that the deviation proposed can be supported, finding that, in compliance with LDC Section 10.02.13 A.3., the petitioner has demonstrated that “the elements may be waived without a detrimental effect on the health, safety and welfare of the community” and LDC Section 10.02 .13 B.5.h., the petitioner has demonstrated that the deviation is “justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to the literal application of such regulations.” Please, refer to the Deviation Discussion portion of the staff report below for a more extensive examination of the deviation. DEVIATION DISCUSSION: The petitioner is seeking one new deviation from the requirements of the LDC. The deviation is found in PUD Section 4.5 “Development Deviations.” The deviation location is depicted on the Master Plan. The petitioner’s rationale and staff analysis/recommendation are outlined below. 9.A.4.a Packet Pg. 944 Attachment: STAFF REPORT Creekside 8-27-21 (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) CREEKSIDE COMMERCE PARK CPUD, PUDA-PL20190002850 August 27, 2021 Page 14 of 15 Deviation #4: (New Deviation in Section 4.5. 4. applies to B District only): Deviation #4 seeks relief from LDC Section 4.06.02.C.2, “Table 2.4 Table of Buffer Requirements by Land Use Classifications”, which requires Residential (RMF-6, RMF-12, RMF-16) multifamily district/use adjacent to Commercial 3 (C-1, C-2, C-3, C-4, C-5); Business Park (BP) district/use to provide a 15’ wide type ‘B’ landscape buffer, to allow no buffer between the proposed residential use and the existing commercial use located to the North and a shared 15-foot wide type ‘B’ buffer with the institutional use located to the South. Petitioner’s Justification: Tract 8 within the Creekside PUD is proposed to have a residential development option, making this portion of the PUD to be a mixed-use project which is intended to have a more urban form. A portion of Tract 8 has been developed with retail and office uses and the proposed residential units will have the ability to share internal infrastructure such as parking and drive aisles with the retail facility. This form of development is not unlike that found at Mercato where residential buildings and non- residential uses are located adjacent to each other. The projects share the same parent ownership and will share infrastructure within the PUD. The future residents will be provided notice as part of their unit lease that they will be living in a mixed-use area and will be subject to commercial uses and noise associated with such use. Staff Analysis and Recommendation: Zoning and Land Development Review staff recommend Approval, conditioned on Tract 8 being developed as a unified site development plan, finding that, in compliance with LDC Section 10.02.13.A.3, the petitioner has demonstrated that "the element may be waived without a detrimental effect on the health, safety, and welfare of the community" and LDC Section 10.02.13.B.5.h, the petitioner has demonstrated that the deviation is “justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to the literal application of such regulations.” NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING (NIM): The applicant scheduled a NIM on January 6, 2021, at Saint Monica’s Episcopal Church located at 7070 Immokalee Road, Naples, Florida. There were no attendees. Two letters supporting the petition have been received, one from Arthrex and the other from Naples Community Hospital. Please see Attachment B-Letters of Support. COUNTY ATTORNEY OFFICE REVIEW: The County Attorney Office has reviewed the Staff Report for this petition on August 16, 2021. RECOMMENDATION: Planning and Zoning Review staff recommends that the CCPC forward Petition PUDA- PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUD to the BCC with a recommendation of approval subject to the adoption of the companion GMPA petition PL20190002849/CPSS-20-4, Creekside Commerce Park GMPA. 9.A.4.a Packet Pg. 945 Attachment: STAFF REPORT Creekside 8-27-21 (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) CREEKSIDE COMMERCE PARK CPUD, PUDA-PL20190002850 August 27, 2021 Page 15 of 15 Attachments: Attachment A: Proposed PUD Ordinance Attachment B: Letters of Support Attachment C: Application 9.A.4.a Packet Pg. 946 Attachment: STAFF REPORT Creekside 8-27-21 (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.b Packet Pg. 947 Attachment: Attachment A-Proposed PUD Ordinance- 072121 (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.b Packet Pg. 948 Attachment: Attachment A-Proposed PUD Ordinance- 072121 (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) CREEKSIDE COMMERCE PARK A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PREPARED FOR BARRON COLLIER PARTNERSHIP 9.A.4.b Packet Pg. 949 Attachment: Attachment A-Proposed PUD Ordinance- 072121 (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) Words struck through are deleted; words underlined are added. PL20190002850 CPUD Amendment July 21, 2021 CREEKSIDE COMMERCE PARK A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT 106± Acres Located in Section 27 Township 48 South, Range 25 East Collier County, Florida PREPARED FOR: BARRON COLLIER PARTNERSHIP 2640 Golden Gate Parkway, Naples, FL 34105 PREPARED BY: WILSON, MILLER, BARTON & PEEK, INC. 3200 Bailey Lane, Suite 200, Naples, Florida 34105 YOUNG, VAN ASSENDERP & VARNADOE, P.A. 801 Laurel Oak Drive, Suite 300, Naples, Florida 34101 AMENDED DECEMBER 2005 BY: Q. GRADY MINOR AND ASSOCIATES, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Spring, Florida 34134 ROETZEL AND ANDRESS, L.P.A. 850 Park Shore Drive, 3rd Floor, Naples, Florida 34103 AMENDED MAY 2012 BY: Q. GRADY MINOR AND ASSOCIATES, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Spring, Florida 34134 COLEMAN, YOVANOVICH AND KOESTER, P.A. Northern Trust Bank Building 4001 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 300, Naples, FL 34103 AMENDED AUGUST 2015, JULY 2016 and , OCTOBER 2016 and JULY 2021 BY: Q. GRADY MINOR AND ASSOCIATES, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Spring, Florida 34134 COLEMAN, YOVANOVICH AND KOESTER, P.A. Northern Trust Bank Building 4001 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 300, Naples, FL 34103 9.A.4.b Packet Pg. 950 Attachment: Attachment A-Proposed PUD Ordinance- 072121 (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) Words struck through are deleted; words underlined are added. PL20190002850 CPUD Amendment i July 21, 2021 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE AND SHORT TITLE ii SECTION I LEGAL DESCRIPTION, PROPERTY OWNERSHIP, & 1-1 GENERAL DESCRIPTION SECTION II COMMERCE PARK DEVELOPMENT 2-1 2.1 Purpose 2.2 General Description Of The Park and Proposed Land Uses 2.3 Compliance With County Ordinances 2.4 Community Development District 2.5 Land Uses 2.6 Lake Siting 2.7 Fill Storage 2.8 Use Of Right-Of-Way 2.9 Sales Office and Construction Office 2.10 Changes and Amendments To PUD Document Or PUD Master Plan 2.11 Preliminary Subdivision Plat Phasing 2.12 Open Space and Native Vegetation Retention Requirements 2.13 Surface Water Management 2.14 Environmental 2.15 Utilities 2.16 Transportation 2.17 Common Area Maintenance 2.18 Design Guidelines and Standards 2.19 Landscape Buffers, Berms, Fences and Walls 2.20 Signage 2.21 General Permitted Uses SECTION III INDUSTRIAL/COMMERCE DISTRICT 3-1 SECTION IV BUSINESS DISTRICT 4-1 SECTION V PRESERVE AREA 5-1 EXHIBIT A AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH, LOCATION MAP (WMB&P File No. RZ-255A)OMITTED EXHIBIT B CREEKSIDE COMMERCE PARK MASTER PLAN EXHIBIT B-1 CROSS SECTIONS (ENLARGED) EXHIBIT C CONCEPTUAL BUILDING RENDERING 9.A.4.b Packet Pg. 951 Attachment: Attachment A-Proposed PUD Ordinance- 072121 (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) Words struck through are deleted; words underlined are added. PL20190002850 CPUD Amendment ii July 21, 2021 STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE The purpose of this section is to express the intent of the Barron Collier Partnership, hereinafter referred to as Barron Collier or the Developer, to create a Planned Unit Development (PUD) on 106± acres of land located in Section 27, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. The name of this Planned Unit Development shall be Creekside Commerce Park. The development of Creekside Commerce Park will be in substantial compliance with the planning goals and objectives of Collier County as set forth in the Growth Management Plan. The development will be consistent with the policies and land development regulations adopted thereunder of the Growth Management Plan Future Land Use Element and other applicable regulations for the following reasons: 1. The subject property is within the Urban Mixed Use District as identified on the Future Land Use Map which allows certain industrial and commercial uses. The Urban designation also allows support medical facilities, offices, clinics, treatment, research and rehabilitative centers and pharmacies provided they are located within 1/4 mile of the property boundary of an existing or approved hospital or medical center. The Creekside Commerce Park PUD is located within ¼ mile of the North Collier Hospital. The 2016 petition request is to add 166,000 square feet to the I/C District and 32,000 square feet to the B District. All additional square footage approved in the October 2016 Ordinance amendment will be medical related uses, and will be on Tracts that are within or partially within ¼ mile of the North Collier Hospital property. The 2020 petition (PL20190002850) request is to add 300 multi-family rental units, which were authorized through the companion 2020 small-scale plan amendment (PL20190002849). 2. The existing Industrial zoning is considered consistent with the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) as provided for by Policy 5.9 and 5.11 of the FLUE. 3. The FLUE Urban-Industrial District allows for expansion of the industrial land use provided the rezone is in the form of a PUD, the site is adjacent to existing land designated or zoned industrial the land use is compatible with adjacent land uses and the necessary infrastructure is provided or in place. Creekside Commerce Park has expanded the industrial land use accordingly. 4. The FLUE Urban-Industrial District requires the uses along the boundaries of the project to be transitional. Creekside Commerce Park has included transitional uses accordingly. 5. Creekside Commerce Park is compatible with and complementary to existing and future surrounding land uses as required in Policy 5.4 of the FLUE. 6. Improvements are planned to be in substantial compliance with applicable land development regulations as set forth in Objective 3 of the FLUE. 7. The development of Creekside Commerce Park will result in an efficient and economical extension of community facilities and services as required in Policies 3.1.H and L of the FLUE. 9.A.4.b Packet Pg. 952 Attachment: Attachment A-Proposed PUD Ordinance- 072121 (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) Words struck through are deleted; words underlined are added. PL20190002850 CPUD Amendment iii July 21, 2021 8. Creekside Commerce Park is a master planned, deed-restricted commerce park and is planned to encourage ingenuity, innovation and imagination as set forth in the Collier County Land Development Code (LDC), Planned Unit Development District. 9. This master planned park will incorporate elements from the existing Industrial, Business Park and Industrial PUD sections of the LDC. 9.A.4.b Packet Pg. 953 Attachment: Attachment A-Proposed PUD Ordinance- 072121 (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) Words struck through are deleted; words underlined are added. PL20190002850 CPUD Amendment iv July 21, 2021 SHORT TITLE This ordinance shall be known and cited as the "CREEKSIDE COMMERCE PARK PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE". 9.A.4.b Packet Pg. 954 Attachment: Attachment A-Proposed PUD Ordinance- 072121 (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) Words struck through are deleted; words underlined are added. PL20190002850 CPUD Amendment 1-1 July 21, 2021 SECTION I LEGAL DESCRIPTION, PROPERTY OWNERSHIP, AND GENERAL DESCRIPTION 1.1 PURPOSE The purpose of this section is to set forth the legal description and ownership of Creekside Commerce Park, and to describe the existing condition of the property proposed to be developed. 1.2 LEGAL DESCRIPTION All that part of Section 27, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida being more particularly described as follows; COMMENCING at the northwest corner of said Section 27; thence along the north line of said Section 27 South 89°45’21” East 1869.61 feet; thence leaving said line South 00°14’39” West 125.00 feet to a point on the south right of way line of Immokalee Road (S.R. 846) and the POINT OF BEGINNING of the parcel herein described; thence along said right of way line in the following Six (6) described courses; 1) South 89°45’21” East 485.99 feet; 2) South 00°14’39” West 10.00 feet; 3) South 89°45’21” East 150.19 feet; 4) South 89°48’33” East 716.81 feet; 5) North 05°34’33” West 10.05 feet; 6) South 89°48’33” East 486.21 feet to a point on the west right of way line of Goodlette Road as recorded in Plat Book 3, page 58, Public Records of Collier County, Florida; thence along said line South 05°33’48” East 1767.02 feet; thence leaving said line South 89°20’53” West 51.18 feet; thence North 23°55’53” West 13.07 feet; thence northwesterly, 30.71 feet along the arc of a circular curve concave to the northeast, having a radius of 80.00 feet, through a central angle of 21°59’52” and being subtended by a chord which bears North 12°55’57” West 30.53 feet; thence North 05°00’53” West 31.56 feet; thence North 36°19’20” West 32.02 feet; thence North 56°04’35” West 35.11 feet; thence North 80°39’15” West 32.53 feet; thence North 88°39’12” West 97.78 feet; thence North 86°04’40” West 45.79 feet; thence North 89°49’48” West 132.77 feet; thence North 69°40’10” West 37.23 feet; thence South 89°20’53” West 142.47 feet; thence South 84°59’26” West 24.66 feet; thence South 74°56’50” West 121.32 feet; thence South 79°49’59” West 45.93 feet; 9.A.4.b Packet Pg. 955 Attachment: Attachment A-Proposed PUD Ordinance- 072121 (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) Words struck through are deleted; words underlined are added. PL20190002850 CPUD Amendment 1-2 July 21, 2021 thence westerly and northwesterly, 45.51 feet along the arc of a circular curve concave to the northeast, having a radius of 66.00 feet, through a central angle of 39°30’16” and being subtended by a chord which bears North 80°24’53” West 44.61 feet to a point of compound reverse curvature; thence northwesterly, 52.92 feet along the arc of a circular curve concave to the southwest, having a radius of 150.00 feet, through a central angle of 20°12’57” and being subtended by a chord which bears North 70°46’13” West 52.65 feet; thence North 80°52’42” West 36.59 feet; thence westerly and southwesterly, 46.18 feet along the arc of a circular curve concave to the southeast, having a radius of 80.00 feet, through a central angle of 33°04’14” and being subtended by a chord which bears South 82°35’11” West 45.54 feet to a point of compound curvature; thence southwesterly and westerly, 38.16 feet along the arc of a circular curve concave to the northwest, having a radius of 60.00 feet, through a central angle of 36°26’19” and being subtended by a chord which bears South 84°16’14” West 37.52 feet to a point of compound reverse curvature; thence westerly and northwesterly, 68.85 feet along the arc of a circular curve concave to the southwest, having a radius of 305.00 feet, through a central angle of 12°55’59” and being subtended by a chord which bears North 83°58’36” West 68.70 feet; thence South 89°33’25” West 18.36 feet; thence South 89°39’19” West 71.63 feet; thence North 89°34’56” West 36.03 feet; thence South 86°06’41” West 42.94 feet; thence South 83°44’16” West 26.23 feet; thence South 51°01’13” West 27.49 feet; thence South 33°25’50” West 19.95 feet; thence South 15°40’05” West 20.54 feet; thence South 10°54’39” West 34.64 feet; thence South 89°20’14” West 101.06 feet; thence North 10°46’06” East 101.42 feet; thence North 89°20’53” East 65.45 feet; thence North 00°39’07” West 100.64 feet; thence South 89°20’53” West 503.78 feet; thence North 00°39’07” West 27.71 feet; thence North 72°58’55” West 131.30 feet; thence North 02°08’56” West 1473.29 feet to a point on the south right of way line of said Immokalee Road (S.R. 846) and the POINT OF BEGINNING of the parcel herein described; Containing 69.48 acres more or less; Subject to easements and restrictions of record. Bearings are assumed and based on the north line of said Section 27 being South 89°49'40" East. All that part of Section 27, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida 9.A.4.b Packet Pg. 956 Attachment: Attachment A-Proposed PUD Ordinance- 072121 (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) Words struck through are deleted; words underlined are added. PL20190002850 CPUD Amendment 1-3 July 21, 2021 being more particularly described as follows; Commencing at the northeast corner of said Section 27; thence along the east line of said Section 27, South 01°09’43” East 125.00 feet to a point on the south right of way line of Immokalee Road (S.R. 846) and the POINT OF BEGINNING of the parcel herein described; thence continue along said east line South 01°09’43” East 1189.62 feet; thence leaving said line South 89°48’50” West 677.35 feet; thence South 05°35’39” East 886.02 feet; thence South 89°48’50” West 400.00 feet to a point on the easterly right of way line of Goodlette Frank Road as Recorded in Plat Book 13, page 58, Public records of Collier County, Florida; thence along said line North 05°35’39” West 2088.10 feet to a point of the south right of way line of said Immokalee Road (S.R. 846); thence along said line South 89°49’40” East 1168.55 feet; thence continue along said line South 89°12’58” East 1.85 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING of the parcel herein described; Containing 38.9 acres more or less; Subject to easements and restrictions of record. Bearings are assumed and based on the north line of said Section 27 being South 89°46'26" East. LESS A PORTION OF TRACTS “R” AND “L1” CREEKSIDE COMMERCE PARK WEST-UNIT ONE AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 29 AT PAGES 57 THROUGH 58 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGIN AT THE NORTHWESTERLYMOST CORNER OF TRACT “R” (CREEKSIDE WAY) CREEKSIDE COMMERCE PARK WEST-UNIT ONE AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 29 AT PAGES 57 THROUGH 58 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE RUN SOUTH 89°45'00" EAST, ALONG THE SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY OF IMMOKALEE ROAD FOR A DISTANCE OF 249.45 FEET; THENCE RUN SOUTH 00°25'51" WEST FOR A DISTANCE OF 107.22 FEET; THENCE RUN SOUTH 60°02'56" EAST FOR A DISTANCE OF 117.20 FEET; THENCE RUN SOUTH 82°32'14" EAST FOR A DISTANCE OF 119.17 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EAST LINE OF TRACT “L1” OF SAID CREEKSIDE COMMERCE PARK WEST-UNIT ONE, ALSO BEING THE WES LINE OF LOT 3 OF SAID CREEKSIDE COMMERCE PARK WEST-UNIT ONE; THENCE RUN SOUTH 00°07'39" EAST, ALONG SAID EAST LINE FOR A DISTANCE OF 111.93 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY OF SAID TRACT “R”; THENCE RUN NORTH 89°58'01" WEST, ALONG SAID NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR A DISTANCE OF 456.64 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY OF SAID TRACT “R”; THENCE RUN NORTH 02°19'57" WEST, ALONG SAID WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR A DISTANCE OF 294.20 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; CONTAINING 2.32 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. 9.A.4.b Packet Pg. 957 Attachment: Attachment A-Proposed PUD Ordinance- 072121 (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) Words struck through are deleted; words underlined are added. PL20190002850 CPUD Amendment 1-4 July 21, 2021 1.3 PROPERTY OWNERSHIP The subject property is currently under the equitable ownership or control of Barron Collier Partnership, or its assigns, whose address is 2640 Golden Gate Parkway, Naples, FL 34105. 1.4 GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY A. The project site is located in Section 27, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, and is generally bordered on the west by Agriculturally zoned and developed property; on the north, across Immokalee Road by office and medical (North Collier Hospital) PUD zoned and developed property; on the east by Medical Office Park currently under development, County Park and County Wastewater Treatment Facility; and on the south by PUD and County Wastewater Treatment Facility. The location of the site is shown on Exhibit A Aerial Photograph, Location Map. B. The zoning classification of the subject property at the time of PUD application is I (Industrial) and A (Agricultural). C. Elevations within the site are approximately 7.5 to 9 feet-NGVD. Per FEMA Firm Map Panels No. 1200670193D, dated June 3, 1986, the Creekside Commerce Park property is located within Zones "AE-11" of the FEMA flood insurance rate. D. The soil types on the site generally include Riviera limestone substratum, Copeland fine sand, Pineda fine sand, Immokalee fine sand, Myakka fine sand, Basinger fine sand, Riveria fine sand, Ft. Drum and Malabar fine sand, and Satellite fine sand. E. Prior to development, vegetation on the site primarily consists of active croplands and small amounts of pine flatwoods. An isolated wetland system is located along the south side of Immokalee Road west of Goodlette-Frank Road. This wetland consists primarily of Brazilian pepper that surrounds a small willow area. The wetland on the east side of Goodlette-Frank Road consists primarily of cabbage palms. A portion of the historic water course within this wetland has been channelized. Brazilian pepper has infested the northern part of this wetland. F. The project site is located within the Pine Ridge Canal and West Branch Cocohatchee River sub-basins, as depicted within the Collier County Drainage Atlas (July, 1995). 1.5 DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT Creekside Commerce Park does not meet the minimum thresholds for a Development of Regional Impact (DRI), pursuant to Chapter 380.06, Florida Statutes, 2016, in that it is at or below 80% of all numerical thresholds in the guidelines and standards set forth therein. 9.A.4.b Packet Pg. 958 Attachment: Attachment A-Proposed PUD Ordinance- 072121 (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) Words struck through are deleted; words underlined are added. PL20190002850 CPUD Amendment 2-1 July 21, 2021 SECTION II PROJECT DEVELOPMENT 2.1 PURPOSE The purpose of this Section is to generally describe the plan of development for Creekside Commerce Park (park), and to identify relationships to applicable County ordinances, policies, and procedures. 2.2 GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PARK AND PROPOSED LAND USES A. Creekside Commerce Park will consist of predominately industrial, warehouse, wholesale, financial institutions, business and office uses, with limited amounts of residential and retail uses. Creekside Commerce Park shall establish project-wide guidelines and standards to ensure a high and consistent level of quality for proposed features and facilities. B. A Land Use Summary indicating approximate land use acreages is shown on the Master plan. The location, size, and configuration of individual tracts shall be determined at the time of Preliminary Subdivision Plat approval with minor adjustments at the time of Final Plat approval, in accordance with Section 3.2.7.2. of the Collier County Land Development Code (LDC). 2.3 COMPLIANCE WITH COUNTY ORDINANCES A. Regulations for development of Creekside Commerce Park shall be in accordance with the contents of this PUD Ordinance, and to the extent they are not inconsistent with this PUD Ordinance, applicable sections of the LDC and Collier County Growth Management Plan which are in effect at the time of issuance of any development order. Where this PUD Ordinance does not provide developmental standards, then the provisions of the specific section of the LDC that is otherwise applicable shall apply to which said regulations relate. B. Unless otherwise defined herein, or as necessarily implied by context, the definitions of all terms shall be the same as the definitions set forth in the LDC in effect at the time of development order application. C. Development permitted by the approval of this PUD will be subject to the Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance, Division 3.15 of the LDC. D. All conditions imposed herein or as represented on the Creekside Commerce Park Master Plan are part of the regulations which govern the manner in which the land may be developed. 9.A.4.b Packet Pg. 959 Attachment: Attachment A-Proposed PUD Ordinance- 072121 (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) Words struck through are deleted; words underlined are added. PL20190002850 CPUD Amendment 2-2 July 21, 2021 E. The Site Development Plans Division of the LDC (Article 3, Division 3.3) shall apply to Creekside Commerce Park, except where an exemption is set forth herein or otherwise granted pursuant to LDC Section 3.3.4. F. The Developer shall submit to the County an annual PUD monitoring report in accordance with LDC Section 2.7.3.6. 2.4 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT A. The Developer may elect to establish a Community Development District (CDD) pursuant to Chapter 190, Florida Statutes, 1997, to provide and maintain infrastructure and community facilities needed to serve the park. A CDD would constitute a timely, efficient, effective, responsive and economic way to ensure the provision of facilities and infrastructure for the proposed development. Such infrastructure as may be constructed, managed and financed by the CDD shall be subject to, and shall not be inconsistent with, the Collier County Growth Management Plan and all applicable ordinances dealing with planning and permitting of Creekside Commerce Park. B. The land area is amenable to infrastructure provision by a district that has the powers set forth in the charter of a Community Development District under Section 190.006 through 190.041, Florida Statutes. Such a district is a legitimate alternative available both to the County and to the landowner for the timely and sustained provision of quality infrastructure under the terms and conditions of County development approval. 2.5 LAND USES A. The location of land uses are shown on the PUD Master Plan, Exhibit B. Changes and variations in building tracts, location and acreage of these uses shall be permitted at preliminary subdivision plat approval, preliminary site development plan approval and final site development plan approval to accommodate utilities, topography, vegetation, and other site and market conditions, subject to the provisions of Section 2.7.3.5. of the Collier County LDC. The specific location and size of individual tracts and the assignment of square footage or units shall be determined at the time of site development plan approval. B. Roads and other infrastructure may be either public, private or a combination of public and private, depending on location, design and purpose. The request for a road to be public shall be made by the Developer at the time of final subdivision plat approval. The Developer or its assignees shall be responsible for maintaining the roads, streets, drainage, common areas, water and sewer improvements where such systems are not dedicated to the County. Standards for roads shall be in compliance with the applicable provisions of the County Code regulating subdivisions, unless otherwise approved during subdivision approval. The 9.A.4.b Packet Pg. 960 Attachment: Attachment A-Proposed PUD Ordinance- 072121 (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) Words struck through are deleted; words underlined are added. PL20190002850 CPUD Amendment 2-3 July 21, 2021 Developer reserves the right to request substitutions to Code design standards in accordance with Section 3.2.7.2. of the LDC. 2.6 LAKE SITING A. As depicted on the PUD Master Plan, lakes have been preliminary sited. The goal of this Master Plan is to achieve an overall aesthetic character for the park, to permit optimum use of the land, and to increase the efficiency of the water management network. Fill material from lakes is planned to be utilized within the park; however, excess fill material may be utilized off-site. The volume of material to be removed shall be limited to ten percent of the calculated excavation volume to a maximum of 20,000 cubic yards. If the applicant wishes to take more off-site, a commercial excavation permit will be required. Final lake area determination shall be in accordance with the South Florida Water Management District stormwater criteria and Section 3.5.7. of the LDC. 1. Setbacks: Excavations shall be located so that the control elevation shall adhere to the following minimum setback requirements, subject to approval of County staff at time of final construction plan approval: a) Twenty feet (20’) from right-of-way of internal roads. The roads will be designed to (AASHTO) road standards and shall incorporate such factors as road alignment, travel speed, bank slope, road cross sections, and need for barriers. b) Forty feet (40’) from Immokalee Road or Goodlette-Frank Road rights-of-way. Perimeter property lines will have a setback of twenty feet (20’). The roads will be designed to (AASHTO) road standards and shall incorporate such factors as road alignment, travel speed, bank slope, road cross sections and need for barriers. 2.7 FILL STORAGE A. Fill storage is generally permitted as a principal use throughout the Creekside Commerce Park PUD. Fill material generated from properties owned or leased by the Developer may be transported and stockpiled within areas which have been disturbed. Prior to stockpiling in these locations, the Developer shall notify the Community Development and Environmental Services Administrator per Section 3.2.8.3.6. of the LDC. The following standards shall apply: 1. Stockpile maximum height: Thirty-five feet (35') 2. Fill storage areas in excess of five feet (5') in height shall be separated from developed areas by fencing, excavated water bodies or other physical barriers if the side slope of the stockpile is steeper than 4 to 1 (i.e. 3 to 1). 9.A.4.b Packet Pg. 961 Attachment: Attachment A-Proposed PUD Ordinance- 072121 (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) Words struck through are deleted; words underlined are added. PL20190002850 CPUD Amendment 2-4 July 21, 2021 a) Soil erosion control shall be provided in accordance with LDC Division 3.7. 2.8 USE OF RIGHTS-OF-WAY Utilization of lands within all park rights-of-way for landscaping, decorative entrance ways, and signage shall be allowed subject to review and administrative approval by the Developer and the Community Development and Environmental Services Administrator for engineering and safety considerations during the development review process. 2.9 SALES OFFICE AND CONSTRUCTION OFFICE Sales offices, construction offices, and other uses and structures related to the promotion and sale of real estate such as, but not limited to, pavilions, parking areas, and signs, shall be permitted principal uses throughout Creekside Commerce Park. These uses may be either wet or dry facilities. These uses shall be subject to the requirements of Section 2.6.33.4., Section 3.2.6.3.6. and Division 3.3 of the LDC, with the exception that the temporary use permit shall be valid through the life of the project with no extension of the temporary use required. These uses may use septic tanks or holding tanks for waste disposal subject to permitting under F.A.C. 10D-6 and may use potable water or irrigation wells. 2.10 CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS TO PUD DOCUMENT OR PUD MASTER PLAN A. Changes and amendments may be made to this PUD Ordinance or PUD Master Plan as provided in Section 2.7.3.5. of the LDC. Minor changes and refinements as described herein may be made by the Developer in connection with any type of development or permit application required by the LDC. B. The Community Development and Environmental Services Administrator shall be authorized to approve minor changes and refinements to the Creekside Commerce Park Master Plan upon written request of the Developer or his assignee. C. The following limitations shall apply to such requests: 1) The minor change or refinement shall be consistent with the Collier County Growth Management Plan and the Creekside Commerce Park PUD document. 2) The minor change or refinement shall not constitute a substantial change pursuant to Section 2.7.3.5.1. of the LDC. 3) The minor change or refinement shall be compatible with external adjacent land uses and shall not create detrimental impacts to abutting land uses, 9.A.4.b Packet Pg. 962 Attachment: Attachment A-Proposed PUD Ordinance- 072121 (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) Words struck through are deleted; words underlined are added. PL20190002850 CPUD Amendment 2-5 July 21, 2021 water management facilities, and conservation areas within or external to the PUD. D. The following shall be deemed minor changes or refinements: 1) Reconfiguration of lakes, ponds, canals, or other water management facilities where such changes are consistent with the criteria of the South Florida Water Management District and Collier County. 2) Internal realignment of rights-of-ways. 3) Reconfiguration of parcels per Section 5.5 of this PUD. E. Minor changes and refinements as described above shall be reviewed by appropriate Collier County staff to ensure that said changes and refinements are otherwise in compliance with all applicable County Ordinances and regulations prior to the Community Development and Environmental Services Administrator’s consideration for approval. F. Approval by the Community Development and Environmental Services Administrator of a minor change or refinement may occur independently from and prior to any application for Subdivision or Site Development Plan approval, however such approval shall not constitute an authorization for development or implementation of the minor change or refinement without first obtaining all other necessary County permits and approvals. 2.11 PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION PLAT PHASING Submission, review, and approval of Preliminary Subdivision Plats for the park may be accomplished in phases to correspond with the planned development of the property. 2.12 OPEN SPACE AND NATIVE VEGETATION RETENTION REQUIREMENTS The PUD will fully comply with all sections of the LDC and meet the requirements of the Growth Management Plan relating to open space and retention of native vegetation. 2.13 SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT In accordance with the Rules of the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD), Chapters 40E-4 and 4-E-40, this project shall be designed for a storm event of 3-day duration and 25-year return frequency. The lake originally approved as Lake L-1, Creekside Unit I Plat, shall continue to be operated and maintained in accordance with the approved plat and approved South Florida Water Management District Permit. 9.A.4.b Packet Pg. 963 Attachment: Attachment A-Proposed PUD Ordinance- 072121 (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) Words struck through are deleted; words underlined are added. PL20190002850 CPUD Amendment 2-6 July 21, 2021 2.14 ENVIRONMENTAL Vegetation shall be retained in accordance with the criteria established in the Conservation and Coastal Management Element of the GMP and Section 3.05.00 of the LDC. 2.15 UTILITIES A. All necessary easements, dedications, or other instruments shall be granted to insure the continued operation and maintenance of all service utilities in compliance with applicable regulations in effect at the time approvals are requested. B. The owner shall convey to Collier County a County Utility Easement (CUE) no less than 15 feet in width for construction of an irrigation quality (IQ) main through the PUD west of Goodlette-Frank from the North County Water Reclamation Facility to the existing IQ main on Immokalee Road. The requested CUE shall be provided in a mutually agreeable location, deemed acceptable by both the Owner and the Public Utilities Planning and Project Management Division, prior to approval of the next development order west of Goodlette-Frank Road. The CUE shall be conveyed to Collier County and the Collier County Water Sewer District at no cost to County, free and clear of all liens and encumbrances. 2.16 TRANSPORTATION A. The Developer shall provide appropriate left and/or right turn lanes on Immokalee Road and Goodlette-Frank Road at the main park entrances. Such turn lanes shall be in place prior to the issuance of any Certificates of Occupancy for a use that utilizes the perspective/associated entrance. B. There shall be a full access intersection at the park’s southern entrance on Goodlette Frank Road. When justified by traffic warrants, this intersection shall be signalized, notwithstanding its proximity to Immokalee Road. C. Future access points to Immokalee and Goodlette-Frank Roads are those shown on the Creekside Commerce Park Master Plan. D. Arterial level street lighting shall be provided by the Developer at the park’s main entrance in conjunction with the development of this entrance. E. Road impact fees shall be paid in accordance with the provisions of Ordinance 92- 22, as amended. F. The Developer shall provide the appropriate easements or reserve right of way so that the southerly access road west of Goodlette Frank Road may be interconnected to the properties to the west of Creekside Commerce Park. 9.A.4.b Packet Pg. 964 Attachment: Attachment A-Proposed PUD Ordinance- 072121 (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) Words struck through are deleted; words underlined are added. PL20190002850 CPUD Amendment 2-7 July 21, 2021 G. The Developer shall provide a fair share contribution toward the capital cost of traffic signals at any project access when deemed warranted by Collier County. The signal shall be owned, operated and maintained by Collier County. H. The Developer agrees to complete construction of the segment of internal roadway that connects Goodlette-Frank Road to the I/C parcel (herein called “southern parcel”) that is west of Goodlette Road and abuts Pelican Marsh prior to the first of the following to occur: 1) The issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the “southern parcel”; 2) The issuance of a certificate of occupancy on the second business parcel to be developed west of the Pine Ridge Drainage Easement; 3) Within 3 years of approval of this PUD; or 4) Within 9 months of obtaining “grant” money or other funds for construction of such infrastructure from an outside source. I. The I/C parcels west of the Pine Ridge Drainage Easement and immediately north of the south road shall connect for service and employee access at the time that the south road is extended to a point that they may connect. J. The Developer agrees to provide the County with an update of the Transportation Impact Statement (TIS) at the time of submittal of a Preliminary Subdivision Plat or Site Development Plan. K. The Goodlette-Frank Road southernmost access to the I/C parcel east of Goodlette- Frank Road shall be limited to a right-in/right-out access. L. The maximum trip generation allowed by the proposed uses both primary and ancillary may not exceed 2,045 (external to the PUD, per TIS dated 09/16/2016 and 07-07-2017 as amended) PM Peak Hour, two-way trips. M. The owner, its successors, or assigns, shall construct a 5-foot wide sidewalk within the Florida Power & Light (FPL) easement, subject to approval by FPL on the west side of Creekside Street and the south side of Creekside Parkway along/within folio # 29331193049 to connect to the existing sidewalk along Creekside Parkway. The construction plans for the sidewalk and the letter request to FPL shall be completed and mailed prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the proposed Arthrex Headquarters building redevelopment on Tract 5 of the Master Plan. The construction of the sidewalk shall be completed no later than one year following FPL’s approval. N. Due to the removal of a portion of the Creekside Boulevard minor collector roadway and re-routing of traffic, the owner, its successors, or assigns, shall design 9.A.4.b Packet Pg. 965 Attachment: Attachment A-Proposed PUD Ordinance- 072121 (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) Words struck through are deleted; words underlined are added. PL20190002850 CPUD Amendment 2-8 July 21, 2021 and construct the re-routed roadway to adequately accommodate AASHTO Interstate Semitrailer (WB-62) standards and provide access to existing postal service truck traffic prior to the removal of a portion of Creekside Boulevard. The design and construction shall be at no cost to Collier County. Any additional right- of-way easements required by County for a public road pursuant to County standards shall be dedicated to the County, free and clear of all liens and encumbrances without County maintenance responsibility. Such dedication shall occur prior to the issuance of the Certification of Occupancy for the proposed Arthrex Headquarters building redevelopment on Tract 5 of the Master Plan and prior to the removal of a portion of Creekside Boulevard. The owner, its successor, or assigns, shall also accept ownership of the entire length of Creekside Boulevard with all maintenance responsibilities. 2.17 COMMON AREA MAINTENANCE Most common area maintenance will be provided by the CDD or by a Property Owner’s Association (POA). The CDD or the POA, as applicable, shall be responsible for the operation, maintenance, and management of the surface water and stormwater management systems and reserves serving Creekside Commerce Park, in accordance with any applicable permits from the South Florida Water Management District. 2.18 DESIGN GUIDELINES AND STANDARDS A. The Collier County Planned Unit Development District is intended to encourage ingenuity, innovation and imagination in the planning, design and development or redevelopment of relatively large tracts of land under unified ownership as set forth in the LDC, Section 2.2.20. B. Creekside Commerce Park is planned as a functionally interrelated business park under unified control. The Developer will establish community-wide guidelines and standards to ensure a high level of quality for both the common areas and the individual parcel developments. C. These guidelines will serve as a control for individual parcel development, and be referred to as The Declaration of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions for Creekside Commerce Park. The level of quality defined in this document is directed towards the creation of an attractive business environment, and these standards are the basis for evaluation of projects submitted for review to the Property Association’s Architectural and Landscaping Committee, referred to as the ALC. The standards in this document will include criteria for site planning, architectural design, lighting, landscaping, and graphics and signage. D. The specific design guidelines will act as supplemental standards to the requirements of this Planned Unit Development Ordinance, and other County codes, but in no way supersede them. 9.A.4.b Packet Pg. 966 Attachment: Attachment A-Proposed PUD Ordinance- 072121 (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) Words struck through are deleted; words underlined are added. PL20190002850 CPUD Amendment 2-9 July 21, 2021 1. Common Areas The master design of the park’s entries and signage, streetscapes, and open space areas will form a harmonious framework that visually links the entire park together. This unified appearance will enhance the image of the entire community. Internal roadways will provide efficient vehicular circulation with streetscapes that create pleasant neighborhood environments. Streetscape plans will be designed to establish a hierarchy of landscape improvements appropriate in scale and character with the function of the street and adjacent land uses. Along these streetscapes a pedestrian walkway system will be established to link each project with the overall community. 2. Individual Projects A. Site Planning: Each individual parcel project will provide a visually appealing, articulated, identifiable path of entry for pedestrians and vehicles from the street to the site and from the site to the buildings themselves. The orientation of a building or structure upon a site will not only reflect the project’s functional need, but will also be responsive to the individual parcel’s characteristics and be sensitive to adjacent land uses and the surrounding community. B. Architectural standards: The objective of the architectural standards will be to promote the creation of an attractive, value-apparent business environment. Design elements throughout a project must be consistent with the nature of the chosen style and building materials selected. Project design should endeavor to adhere to the classical principles of design and avoid clichés, overly complex or garish motifs, while seeking to invoke a “timeless” quality. C. Lighting: The guidelines for lighting will establish a continuity of design for all lighting in the park which is consistent with the overall visual impression of the park. D. Landscaping: The purpose of landscape design guidelines within individual projects is to guide development toward harmonious and visually pleasing landscape that is cohesive with the overall master landscape plan. The Creekside landscape concept will have a naturalistic theme. Similar to the overall project’s plant palette, individual sites will be dominated with plants that are native, xeric, or naturalized within Southwest Florida. Landscape designs will create a coherent theme which emphasizes plant material as a primary unifying element. 1. Landscape elements along public R.O.W.s will be complimentary to streetscape landscaping. Parcel entries will be 9.A.4.b Packet Pg. 967 Attachment: Attachment A-Proposed PUD Ordinance- 072121 (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) Words struck through are deleted; words underlined are added. PL20190002850 CPUD Amendment 2-10 July 21, 2021 designed to harmonize with adjacent streetscape landscaping, and clearly accentuate, the parcel entry. 2. Individual parking lots will be screened from the roadways as much as possible, without obscuring views of the building entrances. In addition, plant materials used around main entrances of buildings will visually cue visitors to their location. E. Graphics/signage: The guidelines serve to provide continuity of design for all signage in the park which is consistent with the overall visual impression of the park. Parcel signage serves the identification needs of the individual tenants and user. 2.19 LANDSCAPE BUFFERS, BERMS, FENCES AND WALLS Landscape buffers, berms, fences and walls are generally permitted as a principal use throughout Creekside Commerce Park. Required buffer treatments shall terminate at entrances to accommodate entrance treatments and at lakes to accommodate views into the park. The following standards shall apply: A. Landscape buffers contiguous to Immokalee Road R.O.W. will be installed at the time of subdivision improvement per construction phase and will have the following characteristics: 1) Minimum width of 20’-0”, measured from the R.O.W. 2) Adjacent to Business District type uses within the Business District, trees will be native, xeric, or naturalized canopy trees, spaced at 25’ on center (O.C.), planted at an initial height of 13’-14’ overall (O.A.) with a 6’ spread. In addition, a continuous 24” high shrub hedge shall be provided within the 20’ buffer. B. Landscape buffers contiguous to Goodlette-Frank Road R.O.W. will be installed at the time of subdivision improvement per development phase and will have the following characteristics: 1) Minimum width of 20’-0”, measured from the R.O.W. 2) Adjacent to Business District type uses, including residential, within the Business and Industrial/Commerce (I/C) Districts, trees will be native, xeric, or naturalized canopy trees, spaced at 25’ O.C., planted at an initial height of 12’ O.A., with a 6’ spread. At the time of individual lot improvements, hedges will be placed at parking lot edges to satisfy the requirements of LDC Section 2.4.7.4. 9.A.4.b Packet Pg. 968 Attachment: Attachment A-Proposed PUD Ordinance- 072121 (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) Words struck through are deleted; words underlined are added. PL20190002850 CPUD Amendment 2-11 July 21, 2021 3) Adjacent to industrial type uses within the Industrial/Commerce District, trees will be native, xeric or naturalized canopy trees, spaced at 25’ O.C., planted at an initial height of 12’ O.A, with a 6’ spread. Trees will be placed on a berm, 3 feet high and supplemented with a 5 foot high hedge consisting of but not limited to the following plant material: coco plum, viburnam, ficus. The intent will be to obtain 80% opacity within one year of planting for travelers on Goodlette-Frank Road. C. Landscape buffers surrounding the perimeter of the park will be installed at the time of subdivision improvement per construction phase. The buffers are referenced on Exhibit B, and proceed in a clockwise direction from the northeast corner of the project as follows: 1) The landscape buffer along the eastern most property boundary, north of the preserve area, as depicted on Exhibit B, shall consist of an Alternative “A” type buffer. Any preservation areas within this buffer may be credited toward buffering requirements. 2) The preserve area along the balance of the eastern most property boundary will serve as the buffer between uses. 3) The Developer will provide a five feet (5’) wide Alternative “A” type buffer with trees planted fifty feet (50’) on center between the business use and the preserve/lake area, as depicted on Exhibit B. 4) The Developer will provide a five feet (5’) wide Alternative “A” type landscape buffer with trees planted fifty feet (50’) on center along the eastern property boundary contiguous to the Collier County Sewage Treatment Plant. 5) The landscape buffer along the southern most property boundary, east of Goodlette-Frank Road, shall be a five feet (5’) wide Alternative “A” type buffer with trees planted fifty feet (50’) on center. An opaque hedge six feet (6’) high will be planted to supplement the existing oak tree buffer planted by the County at the Collier County Sewage Treatment Plant. 6) The existing landscape berm/buffer from Goodlette Frank Road to the west side of the Pine Ridge Drainage Easement will be supplemented as follows: a type “A” buffer along the proposed lake; and the remaining area westward of the lake will be supplemented to consist of 50 sabal palms, 8’-14’ O.A. and 4 Ficus nitida 12’-13’ O.A. and 6’-8’ wide; locations to be coordinated with the adjacent property owner. 7) The Developer will provide a ninety percent (90%) opaque landscape buffer and berm between the I/C District and the Pelican Marsh PUD from the west side of the Pine Ridge Drainage Easement to the existing berm to the west, that approximates the existing Pelican Marsh berm/buffer. This buffer will be 9.A.4.b Packet Pg. 969 Attachment: Attachment A-Proposed PUD Ordinance- 072121 (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) Words struck through are deleted; words underlined are added. PL20190002850 CPUD Amendment 2-12 July 21, 2021 installed concurrent with any I/C construction west of the Pine Ridge Drainage Easement. The buffer shall meet ninety percent (90%) opacity within one (1) year of planting. 8) The Developer will supplement with additional trees the buffer along the remaining portion of the southern property line westward to achieve a ninety percent (90%) opaque buffer. This buffer will be installed concurrent with any I/C construction west of the Pine Ridge Drainage Easement. 9) The landscape buffer between the I/C District and the adjacent Agricultural District along the southern portion of the western property line will be an Alternative “A” type buffer. 10) The landscape buffer between the R.O.W. and the adjacent Agricultural District to the west will be an Alternative “A” type buffer and be incorporated into the R.O.W. D. Maximum fence or wall height internal to the PUD: Twelve feet (12'). E. Landscape buffers, berms, fences and walls will be constructed along the perimeter of the Creekside Commerce Park PUD boundary concurrent with subdivision and site development construction phase, except where noted in this document. F. Sidewalks, water management systems, drainage structures, and utilities may be allowed in landscape buffers pursuant to review and approval of the Development Services Administrator. G. Landscape berms located within the Creekside Commerce Park PUD boundary and contiguous to a property line and/or right-of-way line may be constructed such that the toe of slope is located on the property line and/or encroaches into the right-of- way line when approved by the applicable owner or agency. 2.20 SIGNAGE A. GENERAL 1) Pursuant to Section 2.5.5.2.3.7. of the LDC, the following conditions provide for the required comprehensive sign plan for the Creekside Commerce Park 2) Each platted parcel shall be considered a separate parcel of land. 3) Signs and decorative landscaped entrance features within a County dedicated right-of-way, shall require a right-of way permit subject to the review and approval of the County. 4) All signs shall be located so as not to cause sight line obstructions. 9.A.4.b Packet Pg. 970 Attachment: Attachment A-Proposed PUD Ordinance- 072121 (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) Words struck through are deleted; words underlined are added. PL20190002850 CPUD Amendment 2-13 July 21, 2021 B. PARK ENTRY SIGNS 1) Major park entry signs shall be located as depicted on Exhibit B. Each sign will not exceed 160 square feet in size on any side and signs will be no longer than 25 feet in length and 8 feet in height. 2) Minor park entry signs shall be located as depicted Exhibit B. Each minor monument sign will not exceed 100 square feet in size on any side. Minor monument signs will be no larger than 20 feet in length and 8 feet in height. C. INTERNAL SIGNS 1) Directional or identification signs are allowed within the business park. Such signs may be used to identify the location or direction of approved uses such as sales centers, information centers, etc. Individual signs may be a maximum of 4 square feet per side in size, or signs maintaining a common architectural theme may be combined to form a menu board with a maximum size of 25 square feet per side, and a maximum height of 8 feet. No building permit is required unless such signs are combined to form a menu board. 2) Grand Opening signs: The Developer or parcel owner may display an on-site grand opening sign not exceeding 32 square feet on a side, and not exceeding 64 square feet total. Banner signs shall be anchored and may be displayed on- site for a period not exceeding 14 days within the first three months that the Developer/occupant is open for business. D. USER SIGNS 1) Wall, mansard, canopy or awning signs: One wall, mansard, canopy or awning sign may be permitted for each single-occupancy facility, or for each establishment in a multiple-occupancy facility. Corner units within multiple- occupancy facilities, or multi-frontage single-occupancy facilities shall be allowed two signs, but such signs shall not be combined for the purpose of placing the combined area on one wall. However, the combined area of those signs shall not exceed the maximum allowable display area for signs by this ordinance. a. The maximum allowable display area for signs may not be more than 15 percent of the total square footage of the visual facade of the building to which the sign will be attached and may not, in any case, exceed 200 square feet in area for any sign. 2) Monument and Pole signs: One (1) monument or pole sign is permitted for each lot or parcel for each external and internal road frontage(s). 9.A.4.b Packet Pg. 971 Attachment: Attachment A-Proposed PUD Ordinance- 072121 (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) Words struck through are deleted; words underlined are added. PL20190002850 CPUD Amendment 2-14 July 21, 2021 a. Internal road frontage setbacks: A minimum of fifteen feet (15’) from the edge of pavement. Signs may encroach within the right-of-way subject to maintaining safe site distance triangles as per Section 2.4.4.16. of the LDC and when approved by the Community Development and Environmental Services Administrator and applicable utility. b. External road frontage setbacks: Pole signs shall be setback from any external right-of-way in accordance with the applicable section of the LDC. Monument signs may be permitted closer to the right-of-way subject to maintaining safe site distance triangles as per Section 2.4.4.16. of the LDC and when approved by the Community Development and Environmental Services Administrator and applicable utility. c. Spot or floodlights may be permitted provided said light shines only on the signs or landscaping and is shielded from motorists and adjacent residents. d. Should the U.S. Postal Service purchase or lease land within Creekside Commerce Park, in addition to the user signs as permitted herein, they will be allowed one sign between Immokalee Road and the proposed lake adjacent to the west entry. E. TRAFFIC SIGNS Traffic signs such as street name signs, stop signs, speed limit signs, etc. may be designed to reflect a common architectural theme, in accordance with Section 3.2.8.3.19. of the LDC. 2.21 GENERAL PERMITTED USES A. Certain uses shall be considered general permitted uses throughout the Creekside Commerce Park PUD except in the Preserve Area. General permitted uses are those uses which generally serve the Developer and tenants of Creekside Commerce Park and are typically part of the common infrastructure. B. General Permitted Uses: 1. Essential services as set forth under LDC, Section 2.6.9.1. 2. Water management facilities and related structures. 3. Temporary sewage treatment facilities. 4. Lakes including lakes with bulkheads or other architectural or structural bank treatments. 5. Guardhouses, gatehouses, and access control structures. 9.A.4.b Packet Pg. 972 Attachment: Attachment A-Proposed PUD Ordinance- 072121 (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) Words struck through are deleted; words underlined are added. PL20190002850 CPUD Amendment 2-15 July 21, 2021 6. Temporary construction, sales, and administrative offices for the Developer and Developer's authorized contractors and consultants, including necessary access ways, parking areas and related uses. 7. Landscape features including, but not limited to, landscape buffers, berms, fences and walls subject to the standards set forth in Section 2.11 of this PUD. 8. Fill storage subject to the standards set forth in Section 2.7 of this PUD. Site filling and grading as set forth in Section 2.7 of this PUD. 9. Outdoor recreation facilities, including but not limited to playfields and fitness trails on areas not designated IC or B on the PUD Master Plan. Stadiums shall be prohibited. 10. Any other use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing uses and which the Community Development and Environmental Services Administrator determines to be compatible. 11. Sidewalks may occur within County required buffers if approved by the Community Development and Environmental Services Administrator. 12. Standards for parking, landscaping, signs and other land uses where such standards are not specified herein are to be in accordance with the LDC provision in effect at the time of Site Development Plan Approval. 2.22 MISCELLANEOUS A. Issuance of a development permit by a county does not in any way create any rights on the part of the applicant to obtain a permit from a state or federal agency and does not create any liability on the part of the county for issuance of the permit if the applicant fails to obtain requisite approvals or fulfill the obligations imposed by a state or federal agency or undertakes actions that result in a violation of state or federal law. B. All other applicable state or federal permits must be obtained before commencement of the development. 9.A.4.b Packet Pg. 973 Attachment: Attachment A-Proposed PUD Ordinance- 072121 (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) Words struck through are deleted; words underlined are added. PL20190002850 CPUD Amendment 3-1 July 21, 2021 SECTION III INDUSTRIAL/COMMERCE DISTRICT 3.1 PURPOSE The purpose of this Section is to identify permitted uses and development standards for areas within Creekside Commerce Park designated on the Master Plan as "I/C". 3.2 GENERAL DESCRIPTION Areas designated as “I/C” on the PUD Master Plan are intended to provide a maximum of 709,100 square feet of Floor Area of industrial/commerce uses on 49.90 43± net acres. Intermediate care (SIC Code 8052), parking garages, and group housing and hotel/motel uses (SIC Code 7011) are in addition to the IC gross square footage figures. Wellness Centers limited to employees and hotel guests within the PUD shall not exceed a maximum of 40,000 s.f., and shall not be counted towards overall square footage. There shall be no offsite memberships. The above referenced wellness center shall be located west of Goodlette-Frank Road. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the United States Postal Service parcel may use any available square footage in the I/C District (excluding the 166,000 square feet added by the October 2016 amendment) and the Business District up to a FAR of .35 on the United States Postal Service Parcel until all available square footages are used up in the PUD. 3.3 PERMITTED USES AND STRUCTURES No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or part, for other than the following: A. The permitted principal uses and structures will generally consist of light manufacturing, wholesale, warehouse, processing and packaging, laboratories and clinics, research, design and product development, business services and corporate offices and headquarters. 1. Aircraft Parts and Auxiliary Equipment (Group 3728) 2. Apparel and Other Finished Products (Groups 2311-2399) 3. Building Contractors (Groups 1521-1542), except for general contractors for mobile home repair on site, modular housing and premanufactured housing assembled on site, dry cleaning plant construction, paper pulp mill construction, and truck and automobile assembly plant construction. 9.A.4.b Packet Pg. 974 Attachment: Attachment A-Proposed PUD Ordinance- 072121 (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) Words struck through are deleted; words underlined are added. PL20190002850 CPUD Amendment 3-2 July 21, 2021 4. Business Services (Groups 7311-7313, 7319, 7322, 7323, 7331-7338, 7352, 7359-7389 except for industrial truck rental and leasing; plants, live: rental and leasing; toilets, portable: rental and leasing; employment agencies, except theatrical and motion picture; labor contractors (employment agencies) model registries; labor pools; manpower pools; modeling service; dogs, rental of: for protective service; automobile recovery service; automobile repossession service; bartering services for businesses; bondspersons; bottle exchanges; check validation service; contractors disbursement control; filling pressure containers (aerosol) with hair spray, insecticides, etc.; fire extinguishers, service of gas systems, contract conversion from manufactured to natural gas; metal slitting and shearing on a contract or fee basis produce weighing service, not connected with transportation; scrap steel cutting on a contract or fee basis; solvents recovery service on a contract or fee basis; tobacco sheeting service on a contract or fee basis) 5. Child Day Care Services (Group 8351) 6. Communications (Groups 4812-4899 not including major communications towers related to cellular phone service, radio broadcasting, television broadcasting, radar or telephone service) 7. Computer and Office Equipment (Groups 3571-3579) 8. Construction; Special Trade Contractors (Groups 1711-1799 except for boiler erection and installation contractors; drainage system installations, cesspool and septic tank contractors; fuel oil burner installation and servicing contractors; gasoline hookup contractors; sewer hookups and connection for buildings contractors; epoxy application contractors; fireproofing buildings contractors; gasoline pump installation contractors; lead burning contractors; and mobile home site setup and tie down contractors) 9. Depository and Non-Depository Institutions (Groups 6011-6163) 10. Drugs and Medicines (Groups 2833-2836, except for adrenal derivatives: bulk, uncompounded; barbituric acid and derivatives: bulk, uncompounded; cocaine and derivatives; codeine and derivatives; gland derivatives: bulk, uncompounded; mercury chlorides, U.S.P; mercury compounds, medicinal: organic and inorganic; morphine and derivatives; opium derivatives) 11. Educational Services (Groups 8249-8299 except construction equipment operation schools; truck driving schools; automobile driving instruction; survival schools; vocational counseling) 9.A.4.b Packet Pg. 975 Attachment: Attachment A-Proposed PUD Ordinance- 072121 (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) Words struck through are deleted; words underlined are added. PL20190002850 CPUD Amendment 3-3 July 21, 2021 12. Electronics and Other Electrical Equipment Manufacturing (Groups 3612, 3613, 3624, 3625, 3631, 3641-3676, 3678, 3679, 3694, 3695, 3699, except for airport lighting transformers, autotransformers, electric (power transformers) distribution transformers, electric; electric furnace transformers; lighting transformers, street and airport; transformers, reactor; atom smashers (particle accelerators; electron beam metal cutting, forming, and welding machines; electron linear accelerators; electrostatic particle accelerators)) 13. Engineering, Accounting, Research, Management and Related Services (Groups 8711-8748 except chemical laboratories, commercial research; automobile proving and testing grounds; metallurgical testing laboratories; pollution testing, except automotive emissions testing; radiation dosimetry laboratories; seed testing laboratories; veterinary testing laboratories) 14. Fabricated Metal Products (Groups 3411-3432, 3442, 3444, 3446, 3452, 3469, 3492, 3495, 3496, production of metal is prohibited) 15. Furniture and Fixtures Manufacturing (Groups 2511-2599) 16. Government Offices/Buildings (Groups 9111-9199, 9221, 9222, 9224- 9229, 9311, 9451, 9511-9532, 9611, 9631-9661) 17. Hotels / Motels (Group 7011), not to exceed a maximum of 349 rooms for the entire PUD. Only 2 Hotels/Motels are permitted within the PUD. Only one hotel/motel may be located east of Goodlette-Frank Road, and shall not exceed 180 rooms, and only one hotel/motel may be located west of Goodlette Frank Road. The hotel/motel west of Goodlette Frank Road shall be located on Tract 6, not to exceed 169 rooms, is subject to specific development standards and setbacks in Section 3.4. 18. Industrial and Commercial Machinery (Groups 3524, 3546, 3553-3556, 3559, 3562, 3564-3566, 3581-3599 except for bronzing and dusting machines for printing trades; foundry type for printing; presses, printing - slugs printers’; ammunition and explosives loading machinery; brick making machines; cement making machinery; chemical kilns; control rod drive mechanisms for use on nuclear reactors; foundry machinery and equipment; frame straighteners, automotive (garage equipment); fur sewing machines; ginning machines, cotton; metal finishing equipment for plating, except rolling mill lines; metal pickling equipment, except rolling mill lines) 19. Leather and Leather Products (Groups 3131-3199) 9.A.4.b Packet Pg. 976 Attachment: Attachment A-Proposed PUD Ordinance- 072121 (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) Words struck through are deleted; words underlined are added. PL20190002850 CPUD Amendment 3-4 July 21, 2021 20. Measuring, Analyzing, and Controlling Instruments; Photographic, Medical and Optical Goods: Watches and Clocks Manufacturing (Groups 3812- 3843, 3845-3873) 21. Membership Organizations (Groups 8611-8631) 22. Miscellaneous Manufacturing Industries (Groups 3911-3999 except for dressing of furs: bleaching, blending, curring, scraping, and tanning; feathers: curling, dyeing, and renovating - for the trade; fur stripping; furs dressed: bleached, curried, scraped, tanned, and dyed; pelts: scraping, curring, tanning, bleaching and dyeing; plumes, feather; tear gas devices and equipment; veils made of hair) 23. Motion Picture Production (Groups 7812-7819) 24. Motor Freight Transportation (Groups 4214, 4215) 25. Packing and Crating (Group 4783) 26. Paper and Allied Products (Groups 2652-2657, 2673-2679) 27. Personal Services (Groups 7213, 7216, 7219, 7221) 28. Physical Fitness Facilities (Group 7991) 29. Plastic Materials and Synthetics (Groups 2833,2834) 30. Printing, Publishing and Allied Industries (Groups 2711-2791) 31. Professional Offices: including but not limited to, Travel Agencies (Group 4724); Insurance Agencies (Group 6411); Insurance Carriers (Groups 6311- 6399); Real Estate (Groups 6512, 6514, 6517, 6519, 6531, 6541, 6552,) 32. Rubber and Miscellaneous Plastic Products (Groups 3021, 3085, 3086, 3088, 3089) 33. Transportation Equipment (Group 3732, except for boats, fiberglass: building and repairing; boats: motorboats, sailboats, rowboats, and canoes - building and repairing; houseboats, building and repairing; motorboats, inboard and outboard: building and repairing) 34. United States Postal Service (Group 4311) 35. Warehousing and Storage (Group 4225, 4226, 5014 except oil and gas storage, petroleum and chemical bulk stations and automobile dead storage) only one (1) self-storage use allowed to be located adjacent to the Collier County Sewage Treatment Plant. 36. Wholesale Trade-Durable Goods (Groups 5021-5031, 5043-5049, 5063- 5074, 5078, 5091, 5092, 5094-5099 except for fencing, wood-wholesale; lumber: rough, dressed, and finished-wholesale; batteries, except 9.A.4.b Packet Pg. 977 Attachment: Attachment A-Proposed PUD Ordinance- 072121 (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) Words struck through are deleted; words underlined are added. PL20190002850 CPUD Amendment 3-5 July 21, 2021 automotive-wholesale; storage batteries, industrial-wholesale; unit substations-wholesale; boilers, power: industrial-wholesale; boilers, steam and hot water heating-wholesale; burners, fuel oil and distillate oil- wholesale; oil burners-wholesale) 37. Wholesale Trade-Nondurable Goods (Groups 5111-5143, 5145, 5147- 5149, 5192, 5199 except for cats-wholesale; charcoal-wholesale; dogs- wholesale; fish, tropical-wholesale; furs, dressed-wholesale; greases, animal and vegetable-wholesale; ice, manufactured or natural-wholesale, leather and cut stock-wholesale; linseed oil-wholesale; oils, except cooking: animal and vegetable-wholesale; oilseed cake and meal-wholesale; rubber, crude-wholesale; sawdust-wholesale; vegetable cake and meal-wholesale; wigs-wholesale; worms-wholesale) 38. Any other use or service which is comparable in nature with the foregoing uses and is otherwise clearly consistent with the intent and purpose statement of the District and which the Community Development and Environmental Services Administrator determines to be compatible in this District. B. Restricted Principal Uses The following medical related uses must be located within a 1/4 mile radius of the hospital property boundary. 1. Group housing for the elderly limited to Assisted living facilities, independent living units, skilled nursing units and continuing care retirement communities. A maximum of 400 aggregate beds shall be permitted for the uses listed in Sections 3.3.B.1, 3.3.B.2, 4.3.B.1 and 4.3.B.3. These uses are limited to parcels located east of Goodlette-Frank Road. 2. Health Services, medical clinics and offices (Groups 8011-8049, 8052), a maximum of 400 aggregate beds shall be permitted for the uses listed in Sections 3.3.B.1, 3.3.B.2, 4.3.B.1 and 4.3.B.3. SIC Code 8052 land uses are limited to parcels located east of Goodlette-Frank Road. 3. Medical Laboratories and research and Rehabilitative Centers (Groups 8071-8092, 8099) 4. Any other use or service which is comparable in nature with the foregoing uses and is otherwise clearly consistent with the intent and purpose statement of the District and which the Community Development and Environmental Services Administrator determines to be compatible in this District. 9.A.4.b Packet Pg. 978 Attachment: Attachment A-Proposed PUD Ordinance- 072121 (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) Words struck through are deleted; words underlined are added. PL20190002850 CPUD Amendment 3-6 July 21, 2021 C. Permitted Accessory Uses and Structures: 1. Uses and structures that are accessory and incidental to uses permitted in this district, including indoor and outdoor recreational facilities, including but not limited to physical fitness facilities, playfields and fitness trails. Stadiums shall be prohibited. 2. Retail and wholesale sales and/or display areas as accessory to the principal use, not to exceed an area greater than forty percent (40%) of the gross floor area of the permitted principal use. D. Operational Requirements for Group Housing Group housing uses described in Section 3.2.B.1 shall provide the following services and/or be subject to the following operational standards: 1. The facility shall be for residents 55 years of age and older. 2. There shall be on-site dining for the residents. 3. Group transportation services shall be provided for residents for the purposes of grocery and other types of shopping. Individual transportation services may be provided for the residents’ individualized needs including but not limited to medical office visits. 4. There shall be an on-site manager/activities coordinator to assist residents with their individual needs. The manager/coordinator shall also be responsible for arranging trips to off-site events as well as planning for lectures, movies, music and other entertainment for the residents at the on-site clubhouse. 5. A wellness center shall be provided on-site. Exercise and other fitness programs shall be provided for the residents. 6. Each unit shall be equipped to notify emergency service providers in the event of medical or other emergency. 7. Each unit shall be designed to accommodate residents with physical impairments (handicaps) as required by the applicable building codes and federal law and regulation. 3.4 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS A. Minimum Lot Area: 20,000 S.F. 9.A.4.b Packet Pg. 979 Attachment: Attachment A-Proposed PUD Ordinance- 072121 (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) Words struck through are deleted; words underlined are added. PL20190002850 CPUD Amendment 3-7 July 21, 2021 B. Minimum Lot Width: 100 FT. C. Minimum Yard Requirements: 1. Front Yard, adjacent to Immokalee Road or Goodlette-Frank Road: Fifty feet (50’). For parcels located east of Goodlette-Frank Road, see additional setback requirements in Section 3.4.C.7.a. 2. Front Yard, Internal: Thirty feet (30’) 3. Side Yard: Ten feet (10’) Five feet (5’) to internal property line along Pine Ridge canal drainage easement and FP&L easement 4. Waterfront: Zero feet (0’) to bulkhead or rip-rap at top of bank, otherwise twenty feet (20’) 5. Rear Yard: Twenty-five feet (25’) 6. Minimum Building Setback from Perimeter Boundary of PUD: Fifty feet (50’) 7. Minimum Building Setback from Existing Goodlette-Frank Road Right-of- Way East of Goodlette-Frank Road: a) Goodlette-Frank Road: Minimum of fifty feet (50’), except as provided as follows: i) For group housing for elderly and intermediate care use: (a) If the zoned height of any structure exceeds 50 feet, the minimum setback is 75 feet plus for any portion of a building exceeding fifty feet in zoned height an increased setback at a 1:2 ratio (i.e., for one vertical foot of height, setback is increased by two horizontal feet) for that portion of the building over 50 feet of height. ii) For hotel/motel use: (a) Minimum setback of 75 feet regardless of height plus for any portion of a building exceeding fifty feet in zoned height an increased setback at a 1:2 ratio (i.e., for one vertical foot of height, setback is increased 9.A.4.b Packet Pg. 980 Attachment: Attachment A-Proposed PUD Ordinance- 072121 (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) Words struck through are deleted; words underlined are added. PL20190002850 CPUD Amendment 3-8 July 21, 2021 by two horizontal feet) for that portion of the building over 50 feet of height. D. Maximum Height (Zoned): For parcels west of Goodlette-Frank Road: fifty feet (50’), including silos, storage tanks, elevator towers, satellite dishes, antennas, etc. Facilities located on Tract 5 on the Master Plan shall have a maximum zoned height of one-hundred four (104’) feet and a maximum actual height of one-hundred twenty two (122’) feet, For parcels east of Goodlette-Frank Road: the Hotel, group housing for the elderly, and the intermediate care facility shall have a zoned height seventy-five feet (75’), actual height eight-five feet (85’). All other uses permitted east of Goodlette-Frank Road pursuant to Section III shall have a zoned height of fifty feet (50’) and an actual height of sixty feet (60’). E. Outside storage or display shall be permitted and shall be screened from all internal and external public roadways with a fence or landscaping equivalent or combination thereof. Said fence, wall or landscaped screen shall be opaque in design. All manufacturing operations and equipment, including accessory process equipment such as compressors and air handlers shall be contained in an enclosed structure. F. All I/C buildings shall meet the requirements of Section 5.05.08 of the LDC, except for buildings located on Tract 5, and 6 on the Master Plan, which shall be subject to the deviation process in Section 5.05.08 of the LDC (see Section 3.5.2, Development Deviations, of this PUD Ordinance). The building located on Tract 5 shall be similar in architectural style to the conceptual building rendering in Exhibit C. G. Business District type uses located within the I/C District along Goodlette-Frank Road will meet the Collier County Architectural Guidelines in Division 2.8. of the LDC. H. Industrial type uses abutting Goodlette-Frank Road shall meet the requirements of Section 2.19.B.3 hereof, alternatively, said uses shall have the option of utilizing the landscaped buffer applicable to business uses fronting Goodlette-Frank Road, provided the portion of the building facing Goodlette-Frank Road meets the following Architectural Guideline Sections of the LDC, therefore satisfying the intent of the building design section of the Architectural Guidelines in the opinion of the Community Development and Environmental Services Administrator: 1. Section 2.8.3.5.1., Purpose and Intent 2. Section 2.8.3.5.4., Facade Standard 3. Section 2.8.3.5.6., Project Standards 9.A.4.b Packet Pg. 981 Attachment: Attachment A-Proposed PUD Ordinance- 072121 (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) Words struck through are deleted; words underlined are added. PL20190002850 CPUD Amendment 3-9 July 21, 2021 4. Section 2.8.3.5.7., Detail Features except for 2.8.3.5.7.2. 5. Section 2.8.3.5.12. I. Loading Areas: Buildings west of the Pine Ridge canal and adjacent to the Pelican Marsh boundary shall orient loading docks to the north, east or west. J. Noise: Uses within the I/C District shall not exceed 65 dBA between the hours of 7 a.m. and 10 p.m. Monday through Saturday, and 60 dBA after 10 p.m. to 6:59 a.m. and all of Sundays, as measured at the property boundary of the land use from which the sound emanates. K. Odor: No business shall cause or allow the emission of odorous air from any single source such as to result in odors which are detectable outside the parcel boundaries. Best practical treatment, maintenance, and control currently available shall be utilized in order to maintain the lowest possible emission of odorous air. L. Lighting: Lighting shall be located so that no light is aimed directly toward a property designated residential if lighting is located within 200 feet of residential property. Light fixtures within parking areas shall not exceed 25 feet in height. M. Emissions: All sources of air emissions shall comply with rules set forth by the Environmental Protection Agency (Code of Federal Regulations, Title 40) and the Florida Department of Environmental Regulation (Florida Administrative Code, Chapter 17-2). No person shall operate a regulated source of air emissions without a valid operation permit issued by the Department of Environmental Regulation. 3.5 DEVELOPMENT DEVIATIONS 1. Deviation from LDC Section 5.05.04 D.1 which establishes a .45 floor area ratio (FAR) for group housing uses, to permit an FAR of .6 for group housing uses, including the intermediate care facilities. 2. Deviation from LDC Section 5.05.08, Deviations and alternate compliance, which authorizes the County Manager or designee to administratively approve deviations from compliance with Section 5.05.08 of the LDC for specific types of buildings, to allow general office and medical office, hotel and physical fitness facilities that can be constructed on Tract 5 and 6 of the Master Plan to be eligible for this deviation process. 3. Deviation from LDC Section 4.06.02.C.4., Type D Buffer, which requires a 10’ wide Type D buffer adjacent to rights of way, with trees spaced no more than 30’ on center, to permit the existing street trees planted along the west side of Creekside Street to satisfy the minimum Type D buffer tree requirement of the eastern boundary of Tract 5. 9.A.4.b Packet Pg. 982 Attachment: Attachment A-Proposed PUD Ordinance- 072121 (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) Words struck through are deleted; words underlined are added. PL20190002850 CPUD Amendment 3-10 July 21, 2021 3.6 LANDSCAPE BUFFER RESTRICTIONS The use of bald cypress trees to meet the landscape buffer requirements in section 2.19.B.2. (and B.3) are prohibited 9.A.4.b Packet Pg. 983 Attachment: Attachment A-Proposed PUD Ordinance- 072121 (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) Words struck through are deleted; words underlined are added. PL20190002850 CPUD Amendment 4-1 July 21, 2021 SECTION IV BUSINESS DISTRICT 4.1 PURPOSE The purpose of this section is to identify permitted uses and development standards for areas within Creekside Commerce Park designated on the Master Plan as "B". 4.2 GENERAL DESCRIPTION Areas designated as “B” on the PUD Master Plan are intended to provide a maximum of 269,000 square feet of Floor Area, including approximately 219,000 square feet of office uses, and 50,000 square feet of retail uses, and up to 300 multi-family rental apartments (within the 9.9± acre Creekside Commerce Park East Mixed Use Subdistrict of the Growth Management Plan, shown on the Master Plan) on 22.9023.37± net acres. Intermediate care facilities (SIC Code 8052), parking garages, and group housing and hotel/motel uses (SIC Code 7011) are in addition to the B District gross square footage figures. Wellness Centers limited to employees and hotel guests within the PUD shall not exceed a maximum of 40,000 s.f., and shall not be counted towards overall square footage. There shall be no offsite memberships. The above referenced wellness center shall be located west of Goodlette-Frank Road. 4.3 PERMITTED USES AND STRUCTURES No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or part, for other than the following: A. Permitted Principal Uses and Structures: 1. Apparel and Accessory Stores (Groups 5611-5699) 2. Breweries (Group 2082) 3. Building Contractors (Groups 1521-1542), except for general contractors for mobile home repair on site, modular housing and premanufactured housing assembled on site, dry cleaning plant construction, paper pulp mill construction, and truck and automobile assembly plant construction. 4. Business Services (Groups 7311-7313, 7319, 7322, 7323, 7331-7338, 7352, 7359-7389 except for industrial truck rental and leasing; plants, live: rental and leasing; toilets, portable: rental and leasing; employment agencies, except theatrical and motion picture; labor contractors (employment agencies) model registries; labor pools; manpower pools; modeling service; dogs, rental of: for protective service; automobile recovery service; automobile repossession service; bartering services for businesses; 9.A.4.b Packet Pg. 984 Attachment: Attachment A-Proposed PUD Ordinance- 072121 (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) Words struck through are deleted; words underlined are added. PL20190002850 CPUD Amendment 4-2 July 21, 2021 bondspersons; bottle exchanges; check validation service; contractors disbursement control; filling pressure containers (aerosol) with hair spray, insecticides, etc.; fire extinguishers, service of gas systems, contract conversion from manufactured to natural gas; metal slitting and shearing on a contract or fee basis produce weighing service, not connected with transportation; scrap steel cutting on a contract or fee basis; solvents recovery service on a contract or fee basis; tobacco sheeting service on a contract or fee basis) 5. Child Day Care Services (Group 8351) 6. Convenience Store, food market (Group 5411) only two (2) allowed within the PUD and Gasoline Filling Station (Group 5541) only one (1) allowed within the PUD. 7. Communications (Groups 4812-4899), not including major communication towers related to cellular phone service, radio broadcasting, television broadcasting, radar or telephone service. 8. Dance and Martial Arts Studios (Groups 7911 and 7999, including only gymnastics and martial arts instruction) 9. Depository and Non-Depository Institutions (Groups 6011-6163) including automatic teller machines 10. Drugs and Medicines (Groups 2833-2836 except for adrenal derivatives: bulk, uncompounded; barbituric acid and derivatives: bulk, uncompounded; cocaine and derivatives; codeine and derivatives; gland derivatives: bulk, uncompounded; mercury chlorides, U.S.P; mercury compounds, medicinal: organic and inorganic; morphine and derivatives; opium derivatives) 11. Dwelling Units, Multi-Family (within the 9.9± acre Creekside Commerce Park East Mixed Use Subdistrict of the Growth Management Plan, shown on the Master Plan) 11.12. Eating Places (Group 5812) not including stand alone drive-thru restaurants. 12.13. Educational Services (Groups 8249-8299 except construction equipment operation schools; truck driving schools; automobile driving instruction; survival schools; vocational counseling) 13.14. Engineering, Accounting, Research, Management and Related Services (Groups 8711-8748 except chemical laboratories, commercial research; automobile proving and testing grounds; metallurgical testing laboratories; pollution testing, except automotive emissions testing; radiation dosimetry laboratories; seed testing laboratories; veterinary testing laboratories) 9.A.4.b Packet Pg. 985 Attachment: Attachment A-Proposed PUD Ordinance- 072121 (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) Words struck through are deleted; words underlined are added. PL20190002850 CPUD Amendment 4-3 July 21, 2021 14.15. Government Offices/Buildings (Groups 9111-9199, 9221, 9222, 9224- 9229, 9311, 9451, 9511-9532, 9611, 9631-9661) 15.16. Hardware Stores (Group 5251) 16.17. Home Furniture, Furnishings and Equipment Stores (Groups 5712-5736) 17.18. Hotels / Motels (Group 7011); not to exceed a maximum of 349 rooms for the entire PUD. Only 2 hotels/motels are permitted within the PUD. Only one hotel/motel may be located east of Goodlette-Frank Road, and shall not exceed 180 rooms, and only one hotel/motel may be located west of Goodlette Frank Road. The hotel/motel west of Goodlette Frank Road shall be located on Tract 6, not to exceed 169 rooms, is subject to specific development standards and setbacks in Section 4.4. 18.19. Miscellaneous Food Stores (Group 5499) 19.20. Miscellaneous General Merchandise Stores (Group 5399) 20.21. Miscellaneous Retail (Groups 5912-5949 and 5992-5999, excluding used merchandise stores, fireworks, gravestones, tombstones and monuments, ice dealers, sales barns, and swimming pools; retail) 21.22. Paint/Glass and Wallpaper (Group 5231) 22.23. Personal Services (Groups 7215, excluding self-service or coin laundries, 7221-7251, 7291 and 7299, including only clothing rental, costume rental, tanning salons and hair services) 23.24. Professional Offices: Travel Agencies (Group 4724); Insurance Agencies (Group 6411); Insurance Carriers (Groups 6311-6399); Real Estate (Groups 6512-6515, 6517, 6519, 6531, 6541, 6552, 6553); Holding and Other Investment Offices (Groups 6712-6799); Attorneys (Group 8111) 24.25. Physical Fitness Facilities (Group 7991) 25.26. Retail Bakeries (Group 5461) 26.27. Security and Commodity Brokers (Groups 6211-6289) 27.28. Any other use or service which is comparable in nature with the foregoing uses and is otherwise clearly consistent with the intent and purpose statement of the District and which the Community Development and Environmental Services Administrator determines to be compatible in this District. B. Restricted Principal Uses 9.A.4.b Packet Pg. 986 Attachment: Attachment A-Proposed PUD Ordinance- 072121 (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) Words struck through are deleted; words underlined are added. PL20190002850 CPUD Amendment 4-4 July 21, 2021 The following medical related uses must be located within 1/4 mile radius of the hospital property boundary. 1. Group housing for the elderly limited to assisted living facilities, independent living units, skilled nursing units and continuing care retirement communities. A maximum of 400 aggregate beds shall be permitted for the uses listed in Sections 3.3.B.1, 3.3.B.2, 4.3.B.1 and 4.3.B.3. These uses are limited to parcels located east of Goodlette-Frank Road. 2. Drug Stores and Proprietary Stores (Group 5912) only one (1) drug store allowed. 3. Health Services, Medical Clinics and Offices (Groups 8011-8049, 8052), a maximum of 400 aggregate beds shall be permitted for the uses listed in Sections 3.3.B.1, 3.3.B.2, 4.3.B.1 and 4.3.B.3. SIC Code 8052 land uses are limited to parcels located east of Goodlette-Frank Road. 4. Medical Laboratories and research and Rehabilitative Centers (Groups 8071-8099) 5. Any other use or service which is comparable in nature with the foregoing uses and is otherwise clearly consistent with the intent and purpose statement of the District and which the Community Development and Environmental Services Administrator determines to be compatible in this District. C. Permitted Accessory Uses and Structures 1. Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with principal uses permitted in this district, including indoor and outdoor recreational facilities, including but not limited to physical fitness facilities, playfields and fitness trails on areas not designated IC or B on the PUD Master Plan. Stadiums shall be prohibited. 2. Retail and wholesale sales and/or display areas as accessory to the principal use, not to exceed an area greater than forty percent (40%) of the gross floor area of the permitted principal use. 3. Parking structure supporting dwelling units may be constructed on Tract 9. D. Operational Requirements for Group Housing Group housing uses described in Section 4.2.B.1 shall provide the following services and/or be subject to the following operational standards: 9.A.4.b Packet Pg. 987 Attachment: Attachment A-Proposed PUD Ordinance- 072121 (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) Words struck through are deleted; words underlined are added. PL20190002850 CPUD Amendment 4-5 July 21, 2021 1. The facility shall be for residents 55 years of age and older. 2. There shall be on-site dining for the residents. 3. Group transportation services shall be provided for residents for the purposes of grocery and other types of shopping. Individual transportation services may be provided for the residents’ individualized needs including but not limited to medical office visits. 4. There shall be an on-site manager/activities coordinator to assist residents with their individual needs. The manager/coordinator shall also be responsible for arranging trips to off-site events as well as planning for lectures, movies, music and other entertainment for the residents at the on-site clubhouse. 5. A wellness center shall be provided on-site. Exercise and other fitness programs shall be provided for the residents. 6. Each unit shall be equipped to notify emergency service providers in the event of medical or other emergency. 7. Each unit shall be designed to accommodate residents with physical impairments (handicaps) as required by the applicable building codes and federal law and regulation. 4.4 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS 1. Non-Residential A. Minimum Lot Area: 20,000 S.F. B. Minimum Lot Width: 100 FT. C. Minimum Yard Requirements: 1. Front Yard, Immokalee and Goodlette-Frank Roads: Fifty feet (50’) 2. Front Yard, Internal Roads: Thirty feet (30’), except for parking structures located on Tract 9, which shall be allowed to have a fifteen foot (15’) setback. 3. Side Yard: Ten feet (10’) Five feet (5’) to internal property line along the Pine Ridge canal drainage easement and FP&L easement 9.A.4.b Packet Pg. 988 Attachment: Attachment A-Proposed PUD Ordinance- 072121 (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) Words struck through are deleted; words underlined are added. PL20190002850 CPUD Amendment 4-6 July 21, 2021 4. Waterfront: Zero feet (0’) to bulkhead or rip-rap at top of bank, otherwise twenty feet (20’) 5. Rear Yard: Twenty-five feet (25’) 6. Minimum Building Setback from Perimeter Boundary of PUD for Properties West of Goodlette-Frank Road: a) Fifty feet (50’) for buildings up to thirty five feet (35’) in height. b) Three additional feet (3’) for every one foot of building height over thirty five feet (35’) adjoining residential districts. 7. For Properties East of Goodlette-Frank Road: Minimum Building Setback from Perimeter Boundary of PUD and from Public Roadways: a) Immokalee Road: Minimum of fifty feet (50’) plus for any portion of a building exceeding a zoned height of fifty feet (50’), that portion of the building shall have its building setback increased at a 1:3 ratio (i.e. one (1’) vertical foot of height for every three (3’) horizontal feet); or For any portion of a hotel that may be constructed on the B designated tract at the southeast corner of Goodlette-Frank Road and Immokalee Road, a minimum three hundred fifty foot (350’) building setback from Immokalee Road. b) Goodlette-Frank Road: Minimum of fifty feet (50’) and for any portion of a building exceeding a zoned height of fifty feet (50’), that portion of the building shall have the setback increased at a 1:2 ratio (i.e. one (1’) vertical foot of height for every two (2’) horizontal feet); or For any portion of a hotel on the B designated tract on the southeast corner of Immokalee Road and Goodlette-Frank Road, the minimum setback from Goodlette-Frank Road shall be seventy-five (75’) regardless of height. D. Maximum Height (Zoned): For parcels west of Goodlette-Frank Road, three stories over parking to a maximum of fifty feet (50’) except that no structure shall be greater than thirty-five feet (35’), on property west of the Pine Ridge Drainage Easement. For Properties East of Goodlette-Frank Road: 9.A.4.b Packet Pg. 989 Attachment: Attachment A-Proposed PUD Ordinance- 072121 (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) Words struck through are deleted; words underlined are added. PL20190002850 CPUD Amendment 4-7 July 21, 2021 a) The group housing for the elderly and intermediate care facilities constructed on the B designated tract located at the southeast quadrant of the Goodlette-Frank Road and Immokalee Road intersection shall have a zoned height of sixty feet (60’) and an actual height of seventy feet (70’), except that a hotel building or structure associated with this use may not exceed a zoned height of seventy five feet (75’) and an actual height of eighty five (85’). All other uses on Tract 9 on the Master Plan shall be permitted to have a zoned height of seventy five feet (75’) and an actual height of eighty five (85’) b) The group housing for the elderly and intermediate care facilities constructed on the easternmost B designated tract adjacent to Immokalee Road, as shown on the Master Plan, shall have a zoned height of sixty feet (60’) and an actual height of seventy feet (70’). c) All other uses permitted pursuant to Section IV shall be limited to a maximum zoned height of fifty (50’) and an actual height of sixty (60’). E. Commercial design guidelines for facilities in the Business District shall be subject to the provisions of Division 2.8. Architectural and Site Design Standards and Site Design Standards for commercial buildings and projects, except buildings located on the southern portion of Tract 3. Buildings located in the southern portion of Tract 3 as labeled on the Master Plan shall be subject to the deviation process in Section 5.05.08 of the LDC (see Section 4.5.3, Development Deviations, of this PUD Ordinance). F. Outside storage or display shall be permitted and shall be screened from all internal and external public roadways with a fence at least seven feet in height above ground level, or landscaping equivalent or combination thereof. Said fence, wall or landscaped screen shall be opaque in design. 2. Residential PRINCIPAL STRUCTURES MULTI-FAMILY Minimum Lot Area 1 acre Minimum Lot Width N.A. Minimum Lot Depth N.A. Minimum Front Yard Setback (Goodlette-Frank Road) 50 feet (1) Minimum Side Yard Setback 10 feet Minimum Rear Yard Setback 10 feet Minimum from Creekside Blvd. E. (2)(4) 30 feet Minimum Lake Maintenance Easement Setback 0 feet Minimum PUD Boundary Setback 50 feet 9.A.4.b Packet Pg. 990 Attachment: Attachment A-Proposed PUD Ordinance- 072121 (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) Words struck through are deleted; words underlined are added. PL20190002850 CPUD Amendment 4-8 July 21, 2021 Maximum Building Height Zoned Actual 95 feet 100 feet Minimum Distance Between Buildings 20 feet Floor Area Min. (S.F.), per unit, ground floor 550 s.f. ACCESSORY STRUCTURES Minimum Front Yard Setback (Goodlette-Frank Road) 50 feet Minimum Side Yard Setback 5 feet Minimum Rear Yard Setback 10 feet Minimum from Creekside Blvd. E. 15 feet (2)(4) Minimum PUD Boundary Setback 15 feet Minimum Distance Between Buildings 0/10 feet Maximum Height (3) Zoned Actual 20 feet 25 feet (1) For any portion of a building exceeding a zoned height of fifty feet (50’), that portion of the building shall have the setback increased at a 1:2 ratio (i.e. one (1’) horizontal foot setback for every two (2’) vertical feet of height). (2) There shall be no required building setback from Creekside Boulevard East for a pedestrian bridge and supporting infrastructure. (3) Not applicable to an elevated pedestrian bridge. Parking garage shall be subject to building height per Section 4.4.D. a) above. (4) A free-standing parking garage may be constructed at fifteen feet (15’) from Creekside Boulevard East. 4.5 DEVELOPMENT DEVIATIONS 1. Deviation from LDC Section 5.05.04 D.1 which establishes a .45 floor area ratio (FAR) for group housing uses, to permit an FAR of .6 for group housing uses, including the intermediate care facility. 2. Deviation from LDC Section 5.06.04.F.3 Directory signs, which authorizes one (1) directory sign to be located at the project entrance, to permit installation of the directory sign on Immokalee Road east of Goodlette-Frank Road, not at the project entry, but rather at a location between the project entry and Goodlette-Frank Road. 3. Deviation from LDC Section 5.05.08.G, Deviations and alternate compliance, which authorizes the County Manager or designee to administratively approve deviations from compliance with Section 5.05.08 of the LDC for specific types of buildings, to allow general office and medical office, hotel and physical fitness facilities that can be constructed on the southern portion of Tract 3 of the Master Plan to be eligible for this deviation process. 9.A.4.b Packet Pg. 991 Attachment: Attachment A-Proposed PUD Ordinance- 072121 (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) Words struck through are deleted; words underlined are added. PL20190002850 CPUD Amendment 4-9 July 21, 2021 4. Deviation from LDC Section 4.06.02.C.2, “Table 2.4 Table of Buffer Requirements by Land Use Classifications”, which requires Residential (RMF-6, RMF-12, RMF-16) multifamily district/use adjacent to Commercial 3 (C- 1, C-2, C-3, C-4, C-5); Business Park (BP) district/use to provide a 15’ wide type ‘B’ landscape buffer, to allow no buffer between the proposed residential use and the existing commercial use located to the north and a shared 15 foot wide type ‘B’ buffer with the institutional use located to the south. 4.6 LANDSCAPE BUFFER RESTRICTIONS The use of bald cypress trees to meet the landscape buffer requirements in section 2.19.A.2 (and B.2) are prohibited. 9.A.4.b Packet Pg. 992 Attachment: Attachment A-Proposed PUD Ordinance- 072121 (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) Words struck through are deleted; words underlined are added. PL20190002850 CPUD Amendment 5-1 July 21, 2021 SECTION V PRESERVE AREA 5.1 PURPOSE The purpose of this Section is to identify permitted uses and development standards for the area within Creekside Commerce Park, designated on the Master Plan, as Preserve Area. 5.2 GENERAL DESCRIPTION Areas designated as Preserve Area on the Master Plan are designed to accommodate natural systems existing or created as preserves and limited water management uses and functions. 5.3 PERMITTED USES AND STRUCTURES No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land or water used, in whole or in part, for other than the following: A. Permitted Uses and Structures 1. Boardwalks and nature trails (excluding asphalt paved trails). 2. Water management structures. 3. Any other preserve and related open space activity or use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing uses, permitted in accordance with the LDC and which the Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA) or Hearing Examiner determines to be compatible in the Preserve Area. 5.4 PRESERVE DISTRICT PRESERVATION EASEMENT A non-exclusive preservation easement or tract is required by LDC Section 3.2.8.4.7.3. for preservation lands included in the Preserve Area. The Developer, its successor or assign shall be responsible for the control and maintenance of lands within the Preserve Area. Exact location/boundary of the Preserve Area will be determined during the development permitting process with the South Florida Water Management District, Army Corps of Engineers, and Collier County. 9.A.4.b Packet Pg. 993 Attachment: Attachment A-Proposed PUD Ordinance- 072121 (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) Words struck through are deleted; words underlined are added. PL20190002850 CPUD Amendment 5-2 July 21, 2021 5.5 PRESERVE AREA ADJUSTMENTS The proposed native vegetation retention areas, depicted on the Creekside Commerce Park Master Plan, are intended for meeting the native vegetation requirements of the Collier County Growth Management Plan and the Collier County LDC. Adjustments may be made to the location of the preservations areas at the time of preliminary plat or site development plan approval. If adjustments are needed, per the Collier County LDC the Developer will have the option to increase the preservation in another area, enhance and preserve another area, or provide increased native landscape per the Collier County LDC. The proposed preservation areas, including 2.9 acres of wetlands and 4.1 acres of uplands, depicted on the Creekside Commerce Park master plan, are areas where the native vegetation requirements may be met on-site as set forth in the Collier County LDC. 9.A.4.b Packet Pg. 994 Attachment: Attachment A-Proposed PUD Ordinance- 072121 (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.b Packet Pg. 995 Attachment: Attachment A-Proposed PUD Ordinance- 072121 (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.bPacket Pg. 996Attachment: Attachment A-Proposed PUD Ordinance- 072121 (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) EXHIBIT B1 CROSS SECTIONS (ENLARGED) 9.A.4.b Packet Pg. 997 Attachment: Attachment A-Proposed PUD Ordinance- 072121 (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.b Packet Pg. 998 Attachment: Attachment A-Proposed PUD Ordinance- 072121 (19875 : PL20190002850, 9.A.4.c Packet Pg. 999 Attachment: Attachment B-Letters of Support (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.c Packet Pg. 1000 Attachment: Attachment B-Letters of Support (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, FL 34134  239-947-1144  engineering@gradyminor.com  www.gradyminor.com Creekside Commerce Park CPUD (PL20200002850) Application and Supporting Documents Sept. 16, 2021 CCPC Hearing 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1001 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. Ph. 239-947-1144 Fax. 239-947-0375 3800 Via Del Rey EB 0005151 LB 0005151 LC 26000266 Bonita Springs, FL 34134 www.gradyminor.com June 22, 2020 Ms. Nancy Gundlach, AICP Collier County Growth Management Division/ Planning and Regulation Land Development Services Department Comprehensive Planning Section 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 RE: Creekside Commerce Park CPUD Amendment – PL20190002850, Submittal 1 Dear Ms. Gundlach: A Collier County application for Public Hearing for a Planned Unit Development (PUD) Amendment for properties located on the Southeast quadrant of Immokalee Road and Goodlette-Frank Road is being filed electronically for review. This application proposes to amend the eastern portion of the Creekside Commerce Park CPUD, which have been platted as Tracts “P-1”, “2”, “3”, and “5” in Plat Book 54, Pages 84 & 85, to add multi-family residential dwelling units on the east side of Goodlette-Frank road. A companion small-scale plan amendment (PL20190002849) has been filed in order to authorize the proposed multi-family dwellings at this location. This modification is made to the B District within the PUD. The maximum vehicular trip generation figure in Section 2.16.L has been revised due to the addition of the multi-family residential use. A minor change to the Conceptual PUD Master Plan is proposed to modify the preserve and water management area in the southeastern portion of the PUD. Documents filed with submittal 1 include the following: 1. Cover Letter 2. Application for a Public Hearing for PUD Rezone 3. Evaluation Criteria 4. Pre-app Notes 5. Property Owner List 6. Affidavit of Authorization 7. Property Ownership Disclosure Form 8. Covenant of Unified Control 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1002 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) Ms. Nancy Gundlach, AICP RE: Creekside Commerce Park CPUD Amendment – PL20190002850, Submittal 1 June 22, 2020 Page 2 of 2 9. Addressing Checklist 10. Warranty Deed(s) 11. Plat Book 54 Pages 84 & 85 12. Aerial Location Map 13. Environmental Data Requirements 14. Traffic Impact Study 15. Amended PUD Document 2020 16. Ordinance 2018-19 17. School Impact Analysis Please feel free to contact Rich Yovanovich at 435-3535 or me should you have any questions. Sincerely, D. Wayne Arnold, AICP c: Creekside East, Inc. Richard D. Yovanovich GradyMinor File (BCCPUD-19) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1003 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 DĂƌĐŚϰ͕ϮϬϮϬ Page 1 of 11 Application for a Public Hearing for PUD Rezone, Amendment to PUD or PUD to PUD Rezone PETITION NO PROJECT NAME DATE PROCESSED PUD Rezone (PUDZ): LDC subsection 10.02.13 A.-F., Ch. 3 G. 1 of the Administrative Code Amendment to PUD (PUDA): LDC subsection 10.02.13 E. and Ch. 3 G. 2 of the Administrative Code PUD to PUD Rezone (PUDR): LDC subsection 10.02.13 A.-F. APPLICANT CONTACT INFORMATION Name of Property Owner(s): _________________________________________________________ Name of Applicant if different than owner: _____________________________________________ Address: _________________________City: _______________ State: _________ ZIP: ___________ Telephone: _______________________ Cell: ______________________ Fax: __________________ E-Mail Address: ____________________________________________________________________ Name of Agent: ____________________________________________________________________ Firm: _____________________________________________________________________________ Address: ____________________________City: _______________ State: _______ ZIP: __________ Telephone: ____________________ Cell: ____________________ Fax: _______________________ E-Mail Address: ____________________________________________________________________ Be aware that Collier County has lobbyist regulations. Guide yourself accordingly and ensure that you are in compliance with these regulations. To be completed by staff Creekside East Inc. 2600 Golden Gate Pkwy Naples FL 34105 239-262-2600 dgenson@barroncollier.com D. Wayne Arnold / Richard D. Yovanovich Q. Grady Minor and Assoc., P.A. / Coleman, Yovanovich and Koester, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey Bonita Springs FL 34134 239-947-1144 warnold@gradyminor.com / ryovanovich@cyklawfirm.com 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1004 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 DĂƌĐŚϰ͕ϮϬϮϬ Page 2 of 11 REZONE REQUEST This application is requesting a rezone from: _________________________ Zoning district(s) to the ________________________________ zoning district(s). Present Use of the Property: _________________________________________________________ Proposed Use (or range of uses) of the property: _________________________________________ Original PUD Name: ________________________________________________________________ Ordinance No.: ____________________________________________________________________ PROPERTY INFORMATION On a separate sheet attached to the application, provide a detailed legal description of the property covered by the application: x If the request involves changes to more than one zoning district, the applicant shall include a separate legal description for property involved in each district; x The applicant shall submit 4 copies of a recent survey (completed within the last six months, maximum 1" to 400' scale), if required to do so at the pre-application meeting; and x The applicant is responsible for supplying the correct legal description. If questions arise concerning the legal description, an engineer's certification or sealed survey may be required. Section/Township/Range: / / Lot: Block: Subdivision: ___________________________________________________ Metes & Bounds Description: _________________________________________________________ Plat Book: Page #: Property I.D. Number: ____________________________________ Size of Property: _______ ft. x _______ ft. = ________ Total Sq. Ft. Acres: _________ Address/ General Location of Subject Property: __________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________ PUD District (refer to LDC subsection 2.03.06 C): Commercial Residential Community Facilities Industrial Mixed Use Other: ________________ CPUD CPUD Light Manufacturing, Retail, Commercial, Hotel/Motel, Assisted Living Facilities Light Manufacturing, Retail, Commercial, Hotel/Motel, Assisted Living Facilities, Multi-family Residential Creekside Commerce Park CPUD 2018-19 27 48 25 **Creekside Commerce Park East 54 84-86 *See Property Owner List 1168+/- 1193+/-1256706 28.85+/- Southeast quadrant of Immokalee Road and Goodlette Frank Road 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1005 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 DĂƌĐŚϰ͕ϮϬϮϬ Page 3 of 11 ADJACENT ZONING AND LAND USE Zoning Land Use N S E W If the owner of the subject property owns contiguous property please provide a detailed legal description of the entire contiguous property on a separate sheet attached to the application. Section/Township/Range: / / Lot: Block: Subdivision: ___________________________________________________ Plat Book: Page #: Property I.D. Number: ____________________________________ Metes & Bounds Description: _________________________________________________________ ASSOCIATIONS Required: List all registered Home Owner Association(s) that could be affected by this petition. Provide additional sheets if necessary. Information can be found on the Board of County Commissioner’s website at http://www.colliergov.net/Index.aspx?page=774. Name of Homeowner Association: _________________________________________________ Mailing Address: ____________________________ City: _________ State: ______ ZIP: ______ Name of Homeowner Association: _________________________________________________ Mailing Address: ____________________________ City: _________ State: ______ ZIP: ______ Name of Homeowner Association: _________________________________________________ Mailing Address: ____________________________ City: _________ State: ______ ZIP: ______ Name of Homeowner Association: _________________________________________________ Mailing Address: ____________________________ City: _________ State: ______ ZIP: ______ Name of Homeowner Association: _________________________________________________ Mailing Address: ____________________________ City: _________ State: ______ ZIP: ______ Collier Health Center PUD NCH Hospital and medical offices I Waste water treatment plant SW Professional Health Park and I Medical offices and Waste water treatment plant Creekside Commerce Park PUD Medical offices, N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A. N.A.N.A. N.A. N.A.N.A. N.A. The Foundation of Pelican Marsh 1504 Pelican Marsh Boulevard Naples FL 34109 Collier's Reserve Association, Inc. 1715 Colliers Reserve Drive Naples FL 34110 Creekside Commerce Park Property Owners Association, Inc. 1370 Creekside Boulevard Naples FL 34108 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1006 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 DĂƌĐŚϰ͕ϮϬϮϬ Page 4 of 11 EVALUATION CRITERIA Pursuant to LDC subsections 10.02.13 B, 10.02.08 F and Chapter 3 G. of the Administrative Code, staff’s analysis and recommendation to the Planning Commission, and the Planning Commission’s recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners shall be based upon consideration of the applicable criteria. On a separate sheet attached to the application, provide a narrative statement describing the rezone request with specific reference to the criteria below. Include any backup materials and documentation in support of the request. a. The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer, water, and other utilities. b. Adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of any proposed agreements, contract, or other instruments, or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense. Findings and recommendations of this type shall be made only after consultation with the county attorney. c. Conformity of the proposed PUD with the goals, objectives and policies of the Growth Management Plan. (This is to include identifying what Sub-district, policy or other provision allows the requested uses/density, and fully explaining/addressing all criteria or conditions of that Sub-district, policy or other provision.) d. The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening requirements. e. The adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the development. f. The timing or sequence of development for the purpose of assuring the adequacy of available improvements and facilities, both public and private. g. The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion. h. Conformity with PUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the particular case, based on determination that such modifications of justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations. Deed Restrictions: The County is legally precluded from enforcing deed restrictions; however, many communities have adopted such restrictions. You may wish to contact the civic or property owners association in the area for which this use is being requested in order to ascertain whether or not the request is affected by existing deed restrictions. 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1007 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 DĂƌĐŚϰ͕ϮϬϮϬ Page 5 of 11 Previous land use petitions on the subject property: To your knowledge, has a public hearing been held on this property within the last year? If so, what was the nature of that hearing? __________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________ Official Interpretations or Zoning Verifications: To your knowledge, has there been an official interpretation or zoning verification rendered on this property within the last year? Yes No if so please provide copies. PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIREMENTS This land use petition requires a Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM), pursuant to Chapter 3 E. of the Administrative Code and LDC section 10.03.06. Following the NIM, the applicant will submit a written summary and any commitments that have been made at the meeting. Refer to Chapter 8 B. of the Administrative Code for the NIM procedural requirements. Chapter 8 of the Administrative Code requires that the applicant must remove their public hearing advertising sign(s) after final action is taken by the Board of County Commissioners. Based on the Board's final action on this item, please remove all public hearing advertising sign(s) immediately. RECORDING OF DEVELOPER COMMITMENTS Within 30 days of adoption of the Ordinance, the owner or developer (specify name) at their expense shall record in the Public Records of Collier County a Memorandum of Understanding of Developer Commitments or Notice of Developer Commitments that contains the legal description of the property that is the subject of the land use petition and contains each and every commitment of the owner or developer specified in the Ordinance. The Memorandum or Notice shall be in form acceptable to the County and shall comply with the recording requirements of Chapter 695, FS. A recorded copy of the Memorandum or Notice shall be provided to the Collier County Planned Unit Development Monitoring staff within 15 days of recording of said Memorandum or Notice. LDC subsection 10.02.08 D This application will be considered “open” when the determination of “sufficiency” has been made and the application is assigned a petition processing number. The application will be considered “closed” when the petitioner withdraws the application through written notice or ceases to supply necessary information to continue processing or otherwise actively pursue the rezoning, amendment or change, for a period of 6 months. An application deemed “closed” will not receive further processing and an application “closed” through inactivity shall be deemed withdrawn. An application deemed “closed” may be re-opened by submission of a new application, repayment of all application fees and the grant of a determination of “sufficiency”. Further review of the request will be subject to the then current code. 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1008 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 DĂƌĐŚϰ͕ϮϬϮϬ Page 6 of 11 STATEMENT OF UTILITY PROVISIONS FOR PUD REZONE REQUEST APPLICANT CONTACT INFORMATION Name of Applicant(s): _______________________________________________________________ Address: _________________________________ City: ___________ State: ________ ZIP: _______ Telephone: ____________________ Cell: _____________________ Fax: ______________________ E-Mail Address: ____________________________________________________________________ Address of Subject Property (If available): ______________________________________________ City: _________________ State: ________ ZIP: _________ PROPERTY INFORMATION Section/Township/Range: / / Lot: Block: Subdivision: ___________________________________________________ Metes & Bounds Description: _________________________________________________________ Plat Book: Page #: Property I.D. Number: ____________________________________ TYPE OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL TO BE PROVIDED Check applicable system: a. County Utility System b. City Utility System c. Franchised Utility System Provide Name: __________________________ d. Package Treatment Plant (GPD Capacity): _________________________ e. Septic System TYPE OF WATER SERVICE TO BE PROVIDED Check applicable system: a. County Utility System b. City Utility System c. Franchised Utility System Provide Name: __________________________ d. Private System (Well) Total Population to be Served: ________________________________________________________ Peak and Average Daily Demands: A. Water-Peak: _________ Average Daily: __________ B. Sewer-Peak: _________ Average Daily: __________ If proposing to be connected to Collier County Regional Water System, please provide the date service is expected to be required: ____________________________________________________ Creekside East Inc. 2600 Golden Gate Pkwy Naples FL 34105 239-262-2600 dgenson@barroncollier.com Southeast quadrant of Immokalee Rd. and Goodlette Frank Rd. 27 48 25 **Creekside Commerce Park East 54 84-86 *See Property Owner List X X *Please see attached Demand Calculations ** ** 2022 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1009 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) Project Area (SF) # of Practitioners # of Employees Founders Square 34300 15 45 Creekside 45800 20 60 Medical Office Building # of Units Population Consumption Rate per Table I of F.A.C. 64E-6.008 Total Consumption (gpd) Peak Daily Demand Factor Peak Daily Flow (gpd) Medical Office (practitioners)- 20 250 gpd/practitioner 5000 1.35 6750 Medical Office (employees)-60 15 gpd/employee per 8 hour shift 900 1.35 1215 Total:7965 Building # of Units Population Consumption Rate per Table I of F.A.C. 64E-6.008 Total Consumption (gpd) Peak Daily Demand Factor Peak Daily Flow (gpd) Medical Office (practitioners)- 20 350 gpd/practitioner 7000 1.35 9450 Medical Office (employees)-60 21 gpd/employee per 8 hour shift 1260 1.35 1701 Total:11151 Multi-Family Building # of Units Population Consumption Rate per Table I of F.A.C. 64E-6.008 Total Consumption (gpd) Peak Daily Demand Factor Peak Daily Flow (gpd) Multi-Family Units 300 750 250 gpd/unit 75000 1.35 101250 Total:101250 Building # of Units Population Consumption Rate per Table I of F.A.C. 64E-6.008 Total Consumption (gpd) Peak Daily Demand Factor Peak Daily Flow (gpd) Multi-Family Units 300 750 350 gpd/unit 105000 1.35 141750 Total:141750 Wastewater Average Daily Flow (gpd) Potable Water Average Daily Flow (gpd) Wastewater Peak Daily Flow (gpd) 5900 8260 7965 75000 105000 101250 69100 96740 93285 Calculating # of practitioners & employees using same ratio is founders square Wastewater Demand Calculations Wastewater Demand Calculations Potable Water Peak Daily Flow (gpd) Flow Comparison Proposed Increase in Flow Potable Water Demand Calculations Potable Water Demand Calculations Medical Office Multi-Family 11151 141750 130599 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1010 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 DĂƌĐŚϰ͕ϮϬϮϬ Page 7 of 11 Narrative statement: Provide a brief and concise narrative statement and schematic drawing of sewage treatment process to be used as well as a specific statement regarding the method of affluent and sludge disposal. If percolation ponds are to be used, then percolation data and soil involved shall be provided from tests prepared and certified by a professional engineer. __________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________ Collier County Utility Dedication Statement: If the project is located within the service boundaries of Collier County’s utility service system, a notarized statement shall be provided agreeing to dedicate the water distribution and sewage collection facilities within the project area to the Collier County Utilities. This shall occur upon completion of the construction of these facilities in accordance with all applicable County ordinances in effect at that time. This statement shall also include an agreement that the applicable system development charges and connection fees will be paid to the County Utilities Division prior to the issuance of building permits by the County. If applicable, the statement shall contain an agreement to dedicate the appropriate utility easements for serving the water and sewer systems. __________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________ Statement of Availability Capacity from other Providers: Unless waived or otherwise provided for at the pre-application meeting, if the project is to receive sewer or potable water services from any provider other than the County, a statement from that provider indicating adequate capacity to serve the project shall be provided. N.A. included with submittal 1 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1011 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT ǁǁǁ͘ĐŽůůŝĞƌĐŽƵŶƚLJ͘ŐŽǀ (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Page 8 of 11 COVENANT OF UNIFIED CONTROL The undersigned do hereby swear or affirm that we are the fee simple titleholders and owners of record of property commonly known as ____________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________ (Street address and City, State and Zip Code) and legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto. The property described herein is the subject of an application for ______________ planned unit development (______________PUD) zoning. We hereby designate___________________, legal representative thereof, as the legal representatives of the property and as such, these individuals are authorized to legally bind all owners of the property in the course of seeking the necessary approvals to develop. This authority includes, but is not limited to, the hiring and authorization of agents to assist in the preparation of applications, plans, surveys, and studies necessary to obtain zoning approval on the site. These representatives will remain the only entity to authorize development activity on the property until such time as a new or amended covenant of unified control is delivered to Collier County. The undersigned recognize the following and will be guided accordingly in the pursuit of development of the project: 1. The property will be developed and used in conformity with the approved master plan including all conditions placed on the development and all commitments agreed to by the applicant in connection with the planned unit development rezoning. 2. The legal representative identified herein is responsible for compliance with all terms, conditions, safeguards, and stipulations made at the time of approval of the master plan, even if the property is subsequently sold in whole or in part, unless and until a new or amended covenant of unified control is delivered to and recorded by Collier County. 3. A departure from the provisions of the approved plans or a failure to comply with any requirements, conditions, or safeguards provided for in the planned unit development process will constitute a violation of the Land Development Code. 4. All terms and conditions of the planned unit development approval will be incorporated into covenants and restrictions which run with the land so as to provide notice to subsequent owners that all development activity within the planned unit development must be consistent with those terms and conditions. 5. So long as this covenant is in force, Collier County can, upon the discovery of noncompliance with the terms, safeguards, and conditions of the planned unit development, seek equitable relief as necessary to compel compliance. The County will not issue permits, certificates, or licenses to occupy or use any part of the planned unit development and the County may stop ongoing construction activity until the project is brought into compliance with all terms, conditions and safeguards of the planned unit development. ___________________________________ Owner ___________________________________ Printed Name ___________________________________ Owner ____________________________________ Printed Name STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER dŚĞĨŽƌĞŐŽŝŶŐŝŶƐƚƌƵŵĞŶƚǁĂƐĂĐŬŶŽǁůĞŐĞĚďĞĨŽƌĞŵĞďLJŵĞĂŶƐŽĨ ƉŚLJƐŝĐĂůƉƌĞƐĞŶĐĞŽƌŽŶůŝŶĞŶŽƚĂƌŝnjĂƚŝŽŶƚŚŝƐͺͺͺͺ ĚĂLJŽĨͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ͕ϮϬͺͺͺ͕ďLJ;ƉƌŝŶƚĞĚŶĂŵĞŽĨŽǁŶĞƌŽƌƋƵĂůŝĨŝĞƌͿͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ ^ƵĐŚƉĞƌƐŽŶ;ƐͿEŽƚĂƌLJWƵďůŝĐŵƵƐƚĐŚĞĐŬĂƉƉůŝĐĂďůĞďŽdž͗ ƌĞƉĞƌƐŽŶĂůůLJŬŶŽǁŶƚŽŵĞ ,ĂƐƉƌŽĚƵĐĞĚĂĐƵƌƌĞŶƚĚƌŝǀĞƌƐůŝĐĞŶƐĞͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ ,ĂƐƉƌŽĚƵĐĞĚͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺĂƐŝĚĞŶƚŝĨŝĐĂƚŝŽŶ͘ EŽƚĂƌLJ^ŝŐŶĂƚƵƌĞ͗ͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺͺ DĂƌĐŚϰ͕ϮϬϮϬ Notary ^ĞĂů Creekside Commerce Park 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1012 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 DĂƌĐŚϰ͕ϮϬϮϬ Page 9 of 11 Final Submittal Requirement Checklist for: PUD Rezone- Ch. 3 G. 1 of the Administrative Code Amendment to PUD- Ch. 3 G. 2 of the Administrative Code PUD to PUD Rezone- Ch. 3 G. 1 of the Administrative Code The following Submittal Requirement checklist is to be utilized during the Pre-Application Meeting and at time of application submittal. At final submittal, the checklist is to be completed and submitted with an up-to-date application. Please provide the submittal items in the exact order listed below, with cover sheets attached to each section. Incomplete submittals will not be accepted. A Model PUD Document is available online at http://www.colliercountyfl.gov/Home/ShowDocument?id=76983. REQUIREMENTS # OF COPIES REQUIRED NOT REQUIRED Cover Letter with Narrative Statement including a detailed description of why amendment is necessary 1 Completed Application with required attachments (download latest version) 1 Pre-application meeting notes 1 Affidavit of Authorization, signed and notarized 1 Property Ownership Disclosure Form 1 Notarized and completed Covenant of Unified Control 1 Completed Addressing Checklist 1 Warranty Deed(s) 1 List Identifying Owner and all parties of corporation 1 Signed and sealed Boundary Survey 1 Architectural Rendering of proposed structures 1 Current Aerial Photographs (available from Property Appraiser) with project boundary and, if vegetated, FLUCFCS Codes with legend included on aerial. 1 Statement of Utility Provisions 1 Environmental Data Requirements pursuant to LDC section 3.08.00 1 Environmental Data Requirements collated into a single Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) packet at time of public hearings. Coordinate with project planner at time of public hearings. Listed or Protected Species survey, less than 12 months old. Include copies of previous surveys. 1 Traffic Impact Study 1 Historical Survey 1 School Impact Analysis Application, if applicable 1 Electronic copy of all required documents 1 Completed Exhibits A-F (see below for additional information)+ List of requested deviations from the LDC with justification for each (this document is separate from Exhibit E) Checklist continues on next page X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1013 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 DĂƌĐŚϰ͕ϮϬϮϬ Page 10 of 11 Revised Conceptual Master Site Plan 24” x 36”and One 8 ½” x 11” copy Original PUD document/ordinance, and Master Plan 24” x 36” – Only if Amending the PUD Revised PUD document with changes crossed thru & underlined 1 Copy of Official Interpretation and/or Zoning Verification 1 *If located in Immokalee or seeking affordable housing, include an additional set of each submittal requirement +The following exhibits are to be completed on a separate document and attached to the application packet: Exhibit A: List of Permitted Uses Exhibit B: Development Standards Exhibit C: Master Plan- See Chapter 3 E. 1. of the Administrative Code Exhibit D: Legal Description Exhibit E: List of Requested LDC Deviations and justification for each Exhibit F: List of Development Commitments If located in RFMU (Rural Fringe Mixed Use) Receiving Land Areas Pursuant to LDC subsection 2.03.08.A.2.a.2.(b.)i.c., the applicant must contact the Florida Forest Service at 239- 690-3500 for information regarding “Wildfire Mitigation & Prevention Plan.” PLANNERS – INDICATE IF THE PETITION NEEDS TO BE ROUTED TO THE FOLLOWING REVIEWERS: School District (Residential Components): Amy Lockheart Conservancy of SWFL: Nichole Johnson Utilities Engineering: Eric Fey Parks and Recreation: Barry Williams (Director) Emergency Management: Dan Summers Immokalee Water/Sewer District: City of Naples: Robin Singer, Planning Director Other: City of Naples Utilities Other: ASSOCIATED FEES FOR APPLICATION Pre-Application Meeting: $500.00 PUD Rezone: $10,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre PUD to PUD Rezone: $8,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre PUD Amendment: $6,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre Comprehensive Planning Consistency Review: $2,250.00 Environmental Data Requirements-EIS Packet (submittal determined at pre-application meeting): $2,500.00 Listed or Protected Species Review (when an EIS is not required): $1,000.00 Transportation Review Fees: o Methodology Review: $500.00 *Additional fees to be determined at Methodology Meeting. o Minor Study Review: $750.00 o Major Study Review $1,500.00 X X X X X X X X X X 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1014 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 0DUFK Page 11 of 11 Legal Advertising Fees: o CCPC: $1,125.00 o BCC: $500.00 School Concurrency Fee, if applicable: o Mitigation Fees, if application, to be determined by the School District in coordination with the County Fire Code Plans Review Fees are not listed, but are collected at the time of application submission and those fees are set forth by the Authority having jurisdiction. The Land Development Code requires Neighborhood Notification mailers for Applications headed to hearing, and this fee is collected prior to hearing. All checks payable to: Board of County Commissioners. As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is included in this submittal package. I understand that failure to include all necessary submittal information may result in the delay of processing this petition. *Additional fee for the 5th and subsequent re-submittal will be accessed at 20% of the original fee. ___________________________________ _____________ Signature of Petitioner or Agent Date ___________________________________ Printed named of signing party Additional fee for the 5 and subsequent re-su ______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ f X D. Wayne Arnold, AICP 09-03-2020 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1015 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) Creekside Commerce Park CPUD – PL20190002850 Evaluation Criteria September 3, 2020 Page 1 of 6 BCCPUD-19 Evaluation Criteria-r1.docx Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, FL 34134  239-947-1144  engineering@gradyminor.com  www.gradyminor.com Pursuant to LDC subsections 10.02.13 B, 10.02.08 F and Chapter 3 G. of the Administrative Code, staff’s analysis and recommendation to the Planning Commission, and the Planning Commission’s recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners shall be based upon consideration of the applicable criteria. Narrative Statement Describing Request The proposed amendment to the Creekside Commerce Park CPUD proposes to add up to 300 multi-family residential dwelling units on the east side of Goodlette-Frank road as a development option. A companion small-scale plan amendment has been filed in order to authorize the proposed multi-family dwellings at this location. The addition of the residential use is to the B District within the PUD. The maximum vehicular trip generation figure in Section 2.16.L has not been revised with the addition of the multi-family residential use because the PUD proposes no change to the previously established trip cap. If the residential option is pursued, the residential would displace approximately 45,800 square feet of medical office use. The Conceptual PUD Master Plan has been modified to show the Creekside Commerce Park East Mixed Use Subdistrict located east of Goodlette-Frank Road. PUD Rezone Considerations (LDC Section 10.02.13.B) a. The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer, water, and other utilities. The Creekside Commerce Park CPUD is an established commerce park, which has been substantially developed and approved for a variety of light industrial, commercial, office, assisted living, intermediate health care and hotel uses. Infrastructure is in place to serve the existing and proposed uses. The addition of multi-family residential on the east side of Goodlette-Frank Road will be located central to two large employers – Arthrex and Naples Community Hospital (NCH), as well as other employers located within this PUD and other areas of North Naples. b. Adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of any proposed agreements, contract, or other instruments, or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense. Findings and recommendations of this type shall be made only after consultation with the county attorney. The applicant controls all undeveloped land within the Creekside Commerce Park CPUD. 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1016 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) c. Conformity of the proposed PUD with the goals, objectives and policies of the Growth Management Plan. (This is to include identifying what Sub-district, policy or other provision allows the requested uses/density, and fully explaining/addressing all criteria or conditions of that Sub-district, policy or other provision.) The Creekside Commerce Park is an existing CPUD, which permits industrial, business/office, hotel, research and development, and retail uses. A small-scale plan amendment is a companion to the CPUD amendment. The plan amendment will create the Creekside Commerce Park East Mixed Use Subdistrict. The plan amendment establishes a maximum number of 300 multi-family rental units to be constructed in the subdistrict, in addition to other uses permitted within the B District of the CPUD. The CPUD amendment is consistent with the proposed subdistrict. The CPUD amendment is consistent with the Conservation and Coastal Management Element of the Comprehensive Plan. d. The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening requirements. The proposed multi-family rental apartments are compatible with the surrounding land uses internal and external to the site. The residences reflect the demand for rental housing in close proximity to major employers in North Naples. The proposed rental apartments are proposed to be approximately 100’ in height. This height is less than the NCH building just north of the apartments and it is less height than the Arthrex Corporate Offices located on the west side of Goodlette Frank Road. The apartments are buffered from nearby properties by the existing retail and ALF buildings located on Immokalee Road within the Creekside Commerce Park CPUD. There are no nearby residential communities impacted by the proposed rental units. e. The adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the development. The Creekside Commerce Park CPUD Master Plan identifies open space, which meets or exceeds the Land Development Code (LDC) requirements for open space for commercial and industrial development. Additionally, the CPUD contains maximum building coverage requirements, which may provide additional open space on each developable tract. f. The timing or sequence of development for the purpose of assuring the adequacy of available improvements and facilities, both public and private. The project is subject to concurrency and adequate infrastructure must be in place to support future development on the site. 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1017 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) g. The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion. The Creekside Commerce Park CPUD is an existing PUD, which is surrounded by zoned and developed land. Expansion of the CPUD boundary is not anticipated. h. Conformity with PUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the particular case, based on determination that such modifications of justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations. The CPUD amendment proposes to include rental housing units in addition to non- residential uses authorized in the PUD. The proposed development regulations for multi- family dwellings are consistent with standards, which have been utilized in other projects and will result in a development pattern appropriate for the Creekside Commerce Park CPUD. LDC Section 10.02.08 F - Requirements for Amendments to the Official Zoning Atlas F. Nature of requirements of Planning Commission report. When pertaining to the rezoning of land, the report and recommendations of the Planning Commission to the Board of County Commissioners required in LDC section 10.02.08 E shall show that the Planning Commission has studied and considered the proposed change in relation to the following findings, when applicable: 1. Whether the proposed change will be consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies and future land use map and the elements of the Growth Management Plan. The proposed change is consistent with the companion small-scale amendment which authorizes a maximum of 300 rental apartments to be constructed within a portion of the CPUD east of Goodlette-Frank Road. 2. The existing land use pattern. The proposed rental units represent infill development within the Creekside Commerce Park CPUD. The proposed rental apartments will be well located to provide much needed housing in close proximity to NCHs north facility and the corporate headquarters for Arthrex. There are no other rental units existing or proposed that are within close proximity to this major employment hub, nor within 2 miles of the Creekside location. 3. The possible creation of an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts. The CPUD is existing and the amendment will not create an isolated district. 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1018 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 4. Whether existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the property proposed for change. The proposed change does not affect the CPUD boundary. 5. Whether changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed amendment necessary. The County has acknowledged the deficit of rental housing in the community. The County’s own documents identify the deficit and demonstrate that there are no other apartments in the vicinity of the proposed apartments at Creekside Commerce Park CPUD. The current CPUD does not permit rental apartments; therefore, the CPUD amendment is necessary in order to add this use and appropriate development standards. 6. Whether the proposed change will adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood. The addition of up to 300 rental apartments will not adversely affect living conditions in the area. No change is proposed to the vehicular trip cap, therefore the CPUD will be traffic neutral. There are no residences located within 1,000± feet of the proposed apartments and the residences located north of Immokalee Road will be separated from the apartments by commercial uses fronting on both the north and south sides of Immokalee Road, including the NCH North campus on which the primary building exceeds 100’ in height. 7. Whether the proposed change will create or excessively increase traffic congestion or create types of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses, because of peak volumes or projected types of vehicular traffic, including activity during construction phases of the development, or otherwise affect public safety. The traffic analysis prepared in support of the CPUD amendment demonstrates that the proposed amendment is traffic neutral and that the previously approved trip cap will remain as is. 8. Whether the proposed change will create a drainage problem. All proposed improvements will be required to be reviewed by the SFWMD as part of an environmental resource permit, which includes a review of the surface water management system to ensure compliance with approved discharge rates for this drainage basin. 9. Whether the proposed change will seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas. 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1019 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) The changes will have no impact to light or air to adjacent areas. 10. Whether the proposed change will adversely affect property values in the adjacent area. The proposed change should have no impact on property values on adjacent property. All adjacent properties are zoned for commercial or industrial land use. 11. Whether the proposed change will be a deterrent to the improvement or development of adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations. The proposed addition of multi-family rental units at this location will not be a detriment to improvement or development of adjacent properties. The parcel will be buffered from Goodlette-Frank Road by an existing landscape buffer and from Immokalee Road by existing commercial development. The parcel is separated from adjacent Southwest Health Park development, County’s Veterans Park and North Collier Wastewater Treatment Plant by existing preserves and landscape buffers. 12. Whether the proposed change will constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual owner as contrasted with the public welfare. The applicant is a property owner within the CPUD and has the authority to seek amendments to their entitlements. Any property owner within the CPUD has the authority to propose amendments; therefore, there is no grant of special privilege associated with the amendment. 13. Whether there are substantial reasons why the property cannot be used in accordance with existing zoning. The existing zoning does not permit the proposed residential dwelling units; therefore, a CPUD amendment is necessary. 14. Whether the change suggested is out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the county. Collier County continues to experience a deficit in rental apartments. The proposed rental units represent a use that is necessary throughout the County and will serve nearby employers with housing opportunities for employees. 15. Whether it is impossible to find other adequate sites in the county for the proposed use in districts already permitting such use. 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1020 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) While there are other sites located within Collier County that would permit development of rental apartments, none are immediately adjacent to the new corporate headquarters for Arthrex and within walking distance to NCH North, both major employers in Collier County. Having the residences integrated into the campus for Arthrex will allow residential to be located within walking distance of business uses on campus and at NCH across Immokalee Road, which will substantially reduce travel time and lessen the reliance on shuttle services required for more remotely located hotels. This area of North Naples is underserved with rental apartments and no other apartment complexes are located within 2 miles of this site. 16. The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site alteration which would be required to make the property usable for any of the range of potential uses under the proposed zoning classification. The site has been previously cleared and filled and is suitable for the proposed rental apartments. The site currently permits a wide variety of commercial and industrial land uses, many of which are more intense than the proposed residential use. 17. The impact of development on the availability of adequate public facilities and services consistent with the levels of service adopted in the Collier County Growth Management Plan and as defined and implemented through the Collier County Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance [Code ch. 106, art. II], as amended. A Public Facilities Analysis has been prepared in support of this application and companion small scale amendment. There are no deficiencies anticipated with development of this use, and the CPUD will remain neutral with regard to transportation impacts. 18. Such other factors, standards, or criteria that the Board of County Commissioners shall deem important in the protection of the public health, safety, and welfare. The CPUD contains appropriate development standards and commitments, which will insure the protection of the public health, safety and welfare. 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1021 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1022 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1023 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1024 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1025 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1026 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1027 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1028 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1029 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1030 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1031 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1032 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1033 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1034 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1035 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1036 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1037 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) Creekside Commerce Park CPUD (PL20190002850) Property Owner List March 19, 2020 Page 1 of 1 Property Owner List.docx Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, FL 34134  239-947-1144  engineering@gradyminor.com  www.gradyminor.com Parcel No. Property Owner Property Address Subdivision / Condo Tract Unit 23991198024 Creekside East Inc. 1514 Immokalee Rd. Creekside Corners Condominium 1 23991198040 Creekside East Inc. 1267 Creekside Blvd E Creekside Corners Condominium 2 29331180023 Creekside East Inc. Creekside Commerce Park East 2 29331180049 Creekside East Inc. Creekside Commerce Park East 3 29331180544 Creekside East Inc. Creekside Commerce Park East 4 29331180560 Creekside East Inc. Creekside Commerce Park East 4A 29331180586 Creekside East Inc. Creekside Commerce Park East 4B 29331180609 Creekside East Inc. Creekside Commerce Park East 5 29331181103 Creekside East Inc. Creekside Commerce Park East 6 29331181129 Creekside East Inc. Creekside Commerce Park East P-1 29331181145 Creekside East Inc. Creekside Commerce Park East P-2 29331181161 Creekside East Inc. Creekside Commerce Park East P-3 29333000046 Creekside East Inc. Creekside East Land Condominium 2 Creekside East, Inc. 2600 Golden Gate Parkway Naples Florida 34105 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1038 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.dPacket Pg. 1039Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.dPacket Pg. 1040Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.dPacket Pg. 1041Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.dPacket Pg. 1042Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.dPacket Pg. 1043Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.dPacket Pg. 1044Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1045 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1046 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1047 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.dPacket Pg. 1048Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.dPacket Pg. 1049Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.dPacket Pg. 1050Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.dPacket Pg. 1051Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.dPacket Pg. 1052Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.dPacket Pg. 1053Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.dPacket Pg. 1054Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) K>>/ZKhEdz'KsZEDEd 'ZKtd,DE'DEdWZdDEd ǁǁǁ͘ĐŽůůŝĞƌŐŽǀ͘ŶĞƚ ϮϴϬϬEKZd,,KZ^^,KZ/s EW>^͕&>KZ/ϯϰϭϬϰ ;ϮϯϵͿϮϱϮͲϮϰϬϬ&y ;ϮϯϵͿϮϱϮͲϱϳϮϰ ADDRESSING CHECKLIST 3OHDVHFRPSOHWHWKHIROORZLQJDQGHPDLOWR*0'B$GGUHVVLQJ#FROOLHUJRYQHWRUID[WRWKH2SHUDWLRQV'LYLVLRQ DWRUVXEPLWLQSHUVRQWRWKH$GGUHVVLQJ6HFWLRQDWWKHDERYHDGGUHVV)RUPPXVWEHVLJQHGE\ $GGUHVVLQJSHUVRQQHOSULRUWRSUHDSSOLFDWLRQPHHWLQJplease allow 3 days for processing. 1RW DOO LWHPV ZLOO DSSO\ WR HYHU\ SURMHFW ,WHPV LQbold type DUHUHTXLUHGFOLIO NUMBERS MUST BE PROVIDED.)RUPVROGHUWKDQPRQWKVZLOOUHTXLUHDGGLWLRQDOUHYLHZDQGDSSURYDOE\WKH$GGUHVVLQJ6HFWLRQ PETITION TYPE (Indicate type below, complete a separate Addressing Checklist for each Petition type) %/ %ODVWLQJ3HUPLW  %' %RDW'RFN([WHQVLRQ  &DUQLYDO&LUFXV3HUPLW &8 &RQGLWLRQDO8VH  (;3 ([FDYDWLRQ3HUPLW  )3 )LQDO3ODW //$ /RW/LQH$GMXVWPHQW  31& 3URMHFW1DPH&KDQJH  33/ 3ODQV 3ODW5HYLHZ  363 3UHOLPLQDU\6XEGLYLVLRQ3ODW  38'5H]RQH 5= 6WDQGDUG5H]RQH  6'3 6LWH'HYHORSPHQW3ODQ  6'3$ 6'3$PHQGPHQW  6'3, ,QVXEVWDQWLDO&KDQJHWR6'3  6,3 6LWH,PSURYHPHQW3ODQ  6,3, ,QVXEVWDQWLDO&KDQJHWR6,3  615 6WUHHW1DPH&KDQJH  61& 6WUHHW1DPH&KDQJH±8QSODWWHG  7'5 7UDQVIHURI'HYHORSPHQW5LJKWV  9$ 9DULDQFH  953 9HJHWDWLRQ5HPRYDO3HUPLW  956)3 9HJHWDWLRQ5HPRYDO 6LWH)LOO3HUPLW  27+(5 LEGAL DESCRIPTION RIVXEMHFWSURSHUW\RUSURSHUWLHV(copy of lengthy description may be attached) FOLIO (Property ID) NUMBER(s)RIDERYH(attach to, or associate with, legal description if more than one) 675((7$''5(66RU$''5(66(6(as applicable, if already assigned) 352326('675((71$0(6(if applicable) 6,7('(9(/230(173/$1180%(5(for existing projects/sites only) 1 LOCATION MAP PXVWEHDWWDFKHGVKRZLQJH[DFWORFDWLRQRISURMHFWVLWHLQUHODWLRQWRQHDUHVWSXEOLFURDGULJKW RIZD\ 352326('352-(&71$0((if applicable) 6'3RU$5RU3/ 6859(< FRS\QHHGHGRQO\IRUXQSODWWHGSURSHUWLHV &855(17352-(&71$0((if applicable) ■GMPA and PUDA Creekside Commerce Park PUD (see attached Legal Description) See attached list Creekside Blvd E, Pkwy,Way, Trail, Blvd and Street, Arthrex Blvd and Immokalee Road Creekside Commmerce Park CPUD 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1055 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) K>>/ZKhEdz'KsZEDEd 'ZKtd,DE'DEdWZdDEd ǁǁǁ͘ĐŽůůŝĞƌŐŽǀ͘ŶĞƚ ϮϴϬϬEKZd,,KZ^^,KZ/s EW>^͕&>KZ/ϯϰϭϬϰ ;ϮϯϵͿϮϱϮͲϮϰϬϬ&y ;ϮϯϵͿϮϱϮͲϱϳϮϰ 3OHDVH5HWXUQ$SSURYHG&KHFNOLVW%\(PDLO3HUVRQDOO\SLFNHGXS ASSOLFDQW1DPH 6LJQDWXUHRQ$GGUHVVLQJ&KHFNOLVWGRHVQRWFRQVWLWXWH3URMHFWDQGRU6WUHHW1DPH DSSURYDODQGLVVXEMHFWWRIXUWKHUUHYLHZE\WKH2SHUDWLRQV'LYLVLRQ FOR STAFF USE ONLY FROLR Number Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number )ROLR1XPEHU )ROLR1XPEHU Approved by: Date: Updated by: Date: IF OLDER THAN 6 MONTHS, FORM MUST BE UPDATED OR NEW FORM SUBMITTED 2 )D[ (PDLO)D[3KRQH 3URMHFWRUGHYHORSPHQWQDPHVSURSRVHGIRURUDOUHDG\DSSHDULQJLQFRQGRPLQLXPGRFXPHQWV LIDSSOLFDWLRQ LQGLFDWHZKHWKHUSURSRVHGRUH[LVWLQJ  29331180544 29331193023 10/8/2020 (See attached for additional) Creekside Commerce Park ■ Sharon Umpenhour 239-947-1144 sumpenhour@gradyminor.com 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1056 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) Creekside Commerce Park CPUD Legal Description February 17, 2020 Page 1 of 4 Legal Description.docx Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, FL 34134 y 239-947-1144 y engineering@gradyminor.com y www.gradyminor.com All that part of Section 27, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida being more particularly described as follows; COMMENCING at the northwest corner of said Section 27; thence along the north line of said Section 27 South 89°45’21” East 1869.61 feet; thence leaving said line South 00°14’39” West 125.00 feet to a point on the south right of way line of Immokalee Road (S.R. 846) and the POINT OF BEGINNING of the parcel herein described; thence along said right of way line in the following Six (6) described courses; 1) South 89°45’21” East 485.99 feet; 2) South 00°14’39” West 10.00 feet; 3) South 89°45’21” East 150.19 feet; 4) South 89°48’33” East 716.81 feet; 5) North 05°34’33” West 10.05 feet; 6) South 89°48’33” East 486.21 feet to a point on the west right of way line of Goodlette Road as recorded in Plat Book 3, page 58, Public Records of Collier County, Florida; thence along said line South 05°33’48” East 1767.02 feet; thence leaving said line South 89°20’53” West 51.18 feet; thence North 23°55’53” West 13.07 feet; thence northwesterly, 30.71 feet along the arc of a circular curve concave to the northeast, having a radius of 80.00 feet, through a central angle of 21°59’52” and being subtended by a chord which bears North 12°55’57” West 30.53 feet; thence North 05°00’53” West 31.56 feet; thence North 36°19’20” West 32.02 feet; thence North 56°04’35” West 35.11 feet; thence North 80°39’15” West 32.53 feet; thence North 88°39’12” West 97.78 feet; thence North 86°04’40” West 45.79 feet; thence North 89°49’48” West 132.77 feet; thence North 69°40’10” West 37.23 feet; thence South 89°20’53” West 142.47 feet; thence South 84°59’26” West 24.66 feet; thence South 74°56’50” West 121.32 feet; thence South 79°49’59” West 45.93 feet; thence westerly and northwesterly, 45.51 feet along the arc of a circular curve concave to the northeast, having a radius of 66.00 feet, through a central angle of 39°30’16” and being subtended by a chord which bears North 80°24’53” West 44.61 feet to a point of compound curvature; 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1057 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) Creekside Commerce Park CPUD Legal Description February 17, 2020 Page 2 of 4 Legal Description.docx Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, FL 34134 y 239-947-1144 y engineering@gradyminor.com y www.gradyminor.com thence northwesterly, 52.92 feet along the arc of a circular curve concave to the southwest, having a radius of 150.00 feet, through a central angle of 20°12’57” and being subtended by a chord which bears North 70°46’13” West 52.65 feet; thence North 80°52’42” West 36.59 feet; thence westerly and southwesterly, 46.18 feet along the arc of a circular curve concave to the southeast, having a radius of 80.00 feet, through a central angle of 33°04’14” and being subtended by a chord which bears South 82°35’11” West 45.54 feet to a point of compound curvature; thence southwesterly and westerly, 38.16 feet along the arc of a circular curve concave to the northwest, having a radius of 60.00 feet, through a central angle of 36°26’19” and being subtended by a chord which bears South 84°16’14” West 37.52 feet to a point of compound curvature; thence westerly and northwesterly, 68.85 feet along the arc of a circular curve concave to the southwest, having a radius of 305.00 feet, through a central angle of 12°55’59” and being subtended by a chord which bears North 83°58’36” West 68.70 feet; thence South 89°33’25” West 18.36 feet; thence South 89°39’19” West 71.63 feet; thence North 89°34’56” West 36.03 feet; thence South 86°06’41” West 42.94 feet; thence South 83°44’16” West 26.23 feet; thence South 51°01’13” West 27.49 feet; thence South 33°25’50” West 19.95 feet; thence South 15°40’05” West 20.54 feet; thence South 10°54’39” West 34.64 feet; thence South 89°20’14” West 101.06 feet; thence North 10°46’06” East 101.42 feet; thence North 89°20’53” East 65.45 feet; thence North 00°39’07” West 100.64 feet; thence South 89°20’53” West 503.78 feet; thence North 00°39’07” West 27.71 feet; thence North 72°58’55” West 131.30 feet; thence North 02°08’56” West 1473.29 feet to a point on the south right of way line of said Immokalee Road (S.R. 846) and the POINT OF BEGINNING of the parcel herein described; Containing 69.48 acres more or less; Subject to easements and restrictions of record. Bearings are assumed and based on the north line of said Section 27 being South 89°49'40" East. 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1058 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) Creekside Commerce Park CPUD Legal Description February 17, 2020 Page 3 of 4 Legal Description.docx Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, FL 34134 y 239-947-1144 y engineering@gradyminor.com y www.gradyminor.com All that part of Section 27, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida being more particularly described as follows; Commencing at the northeast corner of said Section 27; thence along the east line of said Section 27, South 01°09’43” East 125.00 feet to a point on the south right of way line of Immokalee Road (S.R. 846) and the POINT OF BEGINNING of the parcel herein described; thence continue along said east line South 01°09’43” East 1189.62 feet; thence leaving said line South 89°48’50” West 677.35 feet; thence South 05°35’39” East 886.02 feet; thence South 89°48’50” West 400.00 feet to a point on the easterly right of way line of Goodlette Frank Road as Recorded in Plat Book 13, page 58, Public records of Collier County, Florida; thence along said line North 05°35’39” West 2088.10 feet to a point of the south right of way line of said Immokalee Road (S.R. 846); thence along said line South 89°49’40” East 1168.55 feet; thence continue along said line South 89°12’58” East 1.85 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING of the parcel herein described; Containing 38.9 acres more or less; Subject to easements and restrictions of record. Bearings are assumed and based on the north line of said Section 27 being South 89°46'26" East. LESS A PORTION OF TRACTS “R” AND “L1” CREEKSIDE COMMERCE PARK WEST-UNIT ONE AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 29 AT PAGES 57 THROUGH 58 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGIN AT THE NORTHWESTERLY MOST CORNER OF TRACT “R” (CREEKSIDE WAY) CREEKSIDE COMMERCE PARK WEST-UNIT ONE AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 29 AT PAGES 57 THROUGH 58 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE RUN SOUTH 89°45'00" EAST, ALONG THE SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY OF IMMOKALEE ROAD FOR A DISTANCE OF 249.45 FEET; THENCE RUN SOUTH 00°25'51" WEST FOR A DISTANCE OF 107.22 FEET; THENCE RUN SOUTH 60°02'56" EAST FOR A DISTANCE OF 117.20 FEET; THENCE RUN SOUTH 82°32'14" EAST FOR A DISTANCE OF 119.17 FEET TO 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1059 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) Creekside Commerce Park CPUD Legal Description February 17, 2020 Page 4 of 4 Legal Description.docx Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, FL 34134 y 239-947-1144 y engineering@gradyminor.com y www.gradyminor.com A POINT ON THE EAST LINE OF TRACT “L1” OF SAID CREEKSIDE COMMERCE PARK WEST-UNIT ONE, ALSO BEING THE WES LINE OF LOT 3 OF SAID CREEKSIDE COMMERCE PARK WEST-UNIT ONE; THENCE RUN SOUTH 00°07'39" EAST, ALONG SAID EAST LINE FOR A DISTANCE OF 111.93 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY OF SAID TRACT “R”; THENCE RUN NORTH 89°58'01" WEST, ALONG SAID NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR A DISTANCE OF 456.64 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY OF SAID TRACT “R”; THENCE RUN NORTH 02°19'57" WEST, ALONG SAID WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR A DISTANCE OF 294.20 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; CONTAINING 2.32 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1060 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 1 PARCELID NAME1 STREETNUMBER FULLSTREET BLOCKBLDG LOTUNIT 168040106 TRAIL BOULEVARD LLLP 10560 GOODLETTE-FRANK RD N 008 0 168042706 TRAIL BOULEVARD LLLP 10550 GOODLETTE-FRANK RD N 023 22435007724 CREEKSIDE COMMERCE PARK O 1 23991198024 CREEKSIDE EAST INC 1514 IMMOKALEE RD 1 23991198040 CREEKSIDE EAST INC 1267 CREEKSIDE BLVD E 2 29331180023 CREEKSIDE EAST INC 2 1 29331180049 CREEKSIDE EAST INC 3 1 29331180544 CREEKSIDE EAST INC 4 1 29331180560 CREEKSIDE EAST INC 4A 1 29331180586 CREEKSIDE EAST INC 4B 1 29331180609 CREEKSIDE EAST INC 5 1 29331180612 WHITE OAKS REAL ESTATE 1285 CREEKSIDE BLVD E 5 1.1 29331181103 CREEKSIDE EAST INC 6 1 29331181129 CREEKSIDE EAST INC P-1 1 29331181145 CREEKSIDE EAST INC P-2 1 29331181161 CREEKSIDE EAST INC P-3 1 29331190521 CREEKSIDE COMMERCE PARK 1154 IMMOKALEE RD L1 1 29331190660 CREEKSIDE COMMERCE PARK 1131 ARTHREX BLVD R 1 29331190686 RES FLORIDA 1255 HOLDINGS LLC 1255 CREEKSIDE PKWY 1 29331190709 CREEKSIDE WEST INC 1252 IMMOKALEE RD 2 29331190725 RANI INVESTMENTS LLC 1175 CREEKSIDE PKWY 3 29331190848 UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE 1130 CREEKSIDE PKWY 5 29331193023 CREEKSIDE COMMERCE PARK 1354 CREEKSIDE BLVD R 1 29331193049 RES FLORIDA 1250 HOLDINGS LLC 1293 CREEKSIDE ST 02 1 29331193065 CREEKSIDE COMMERCE PARK 03 1 29331193081 RES FLORIDA 1370 HOLDINGS LLC 1370 CREEKSIDE BLVD 6 29331193104 RES FLORIDA 1370 HOLDINGS LLC 1370 CREEKSIDE BLVD 7 29331193120 RES FLORIDA 1370 HOLDINGS LLC 1360 CREEKSIDE BLVD 8 29331193146 RES FLORIDA 1370 HOLDINGS LLC 9 29331193188 CREEKSIDE HOSPITALITY LLC 1290 INNOVATION DR 11 29331193227 RES FLORIDA 1284 HOLDING LLC 1284 INNOVATION DR 13 29331193243 RES FLORIDA 1265 HOLDINGS, LLC 1265 CREEKSIDE PKWY 14 29331194022 RES FLORIDA 1250 HOLDINGS LLC 1 ARTHREX WAY 4 29333000020 ARHC BSNPLFL01 LLC 1260 CREEKSIDE BLVD E 1 29333000046 CREEKSIDE EAST INC 2 29334000029 RES FLORIDA 1370 HOLDINGS LLC 1 29334000045 RES FLORIDA 1336 HOLDINGS LLC 1336 CREEKSIDE BLVD 2 29331180104 REFERENCE ONLY 3 2 29331180625 REFERENCE ONLY 5 1.2 29331193162 REFERENCE ONLY 10 PUD Folio List 10-08-2020.xls 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1061 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA)                    !   "#   $  %&  ' $ '#!&                          !  "!" # $ %&' ' %&'()' *  ! " 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1062 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1063 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1064 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1065 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1066 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1067 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1068 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1069 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1070 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1071 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1072 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1073 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1074 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1075 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1076 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1077 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1078 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1079 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1080 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1081 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1082 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1083 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1084 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1085 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1086 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1087 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1088 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1089 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1090 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1091 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1092 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1093 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1094 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1095 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1096 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1097 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1098 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1099 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1100 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1101 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1102 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1103 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1104 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1105 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1106 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1107 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1108 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1109 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1110 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1111 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1112 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1113 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1114 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1115 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1116 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1117 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1118 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1119 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1120 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1121 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1122 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1123 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1124 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1125 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1126 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1127 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1128 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1129 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1130 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1131 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1132 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1133 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1134 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1135 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1136 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1137 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1138 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1139 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1140 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1141 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1142 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1143 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1144 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1145 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1146 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1147 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1148 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1149 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1150 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1151 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1152 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1153 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1154 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1155 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1156 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1157 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1158 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1159 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1160 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1161 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1162 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1163 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1164 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1165 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1166 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1167 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1168 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1169 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1170 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1171 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1172 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1173 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1174 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1175 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1176 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1177 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1178 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1179 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1180 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1181 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1182 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1183 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1184 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1185 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1186 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1187 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1188 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1189 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1190 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1191 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1192 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1193 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1194 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1195 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1196 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1197 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1198 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1199 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1200 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1201 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1202 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1203 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1204 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1205 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1206 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1207 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1208 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1209 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1210 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1211 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1212 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1213 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1214 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1215 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1216 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1217 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1218 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1219 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1220 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) Immokalee RD Goodlette-Frank RD NCreekside BLVD ESW Health PKWYC r e e k s i d e B LV D Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AeroGRID, IGN, and the GIS User Community Creekside Commerce Park PUD Location Map . 310 0 310155 Feet Legend Creekside PUD 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1221 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) Environmental Supplement For Collier County Zoning Application CREEKSIDE MAY 2020 Prepared by: TURRELL, HALL & ASSOCIATES, INC 3584 EXCHANGE AVENUE NAPLES, FL 34104 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1222 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) Creekside Environmental Supplement May 15, 2020 Page 1 of 16 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Creekside project site is located in north eastern Collier County, in the south east corner of the intersection of Goodlette-Frank Road and Immokalee Road (CR 846), approximately ¾ of a mile east of US 41. The project boundary is located within Section 27, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. The project is bordered on the south by the North Collier Reclamation Facility and Pelican Marsh PUD, on the west by the Naples Daily News facility, on the north by Immokalee Road and the North Collier Health Park, and the east by additional medical services facilities. Access to the project is via Goodlette-Frank Road along the western boundary of the property. A general location map is provided in the included exhibits. The proposed project is part of an existing commercial development that is bisected by Goodlette- Frank Road. The project has been developed predominantly on the west side of Goodlette-Frank Road with the majority of this side developed or cleared for future development. Businesses currently present on the site west of Goodlette-Frank Road (Creekside Commerce Park West Units One and Two) include: A gas station/convenience store, a bank, a U.S. Post Office, Arthrex Corporation, Creekside Medical Center, as well as a few other businesses. The vacant properties west of Goodlette-Frank Road have been cleared for future construction and three of the parcels have been constructed with medical and assisted living facilities. Also present are existing preserves, a drainage canal, and assorted stormwater management features. The southeast portion of the project site is an existing self-storage facility. The current PUD site is approximately 106 acres. It was 108 acres originally but was reduced in the past when approximately 2 acres was taken out of this CPUD and placed into the adjacent CPUD to the west. The majority of the site has been developed according to prior development approvals. The minimum native habitat requirements would have been based on the native habitats present at the time of the original development approvals. Historical aerials were examined in order to determine the native habitat components that were present prior to the development. The majority of the eastern portion of the site was composed of agricultural fields and the old Regency Packing house. (See enclosed native vegetation map). The western portion of the site was forested and composed of predominately native habitats. Based on a review of 1995 aerials of the site it was estimated that there were 40.93 acres of native habitats present prior to the original PUD approval. The Collier County Land Development Code requires preservation of at least 15% of this which would equate to 6.14 acres. However, a February 2008 Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) produced by Johnson Engineering stated that a minimum preserve requirement of 7.00 acres had been outlined in the prior CPUD approvals. County Staff have stated in prior reviews that 7.00 acres will remain the minimum preserve requirement. The current proposal will impact approximately 1.87 acres of the existing 7.00 acres of platted preserves to allow for the expansion of one of the commercial parcels and reconfiguration of the stormwater management system. Should the project modification be approved, the remaining preserve area within the PUD boundary will be 5.13 acres. The applicant is proposing to provide a minimum of 1.87 acres of required preserve through an off-site source. This environmental summary is for the property on the east side of Goodlette-Frank Road. This parcel is approximately 28.9 acres in size and currently has three facilities already constructed. 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1223 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) Creekside Environmental Supplement May 15, 2020 Page 2 of 16 The amendment is being proposes to alter the site plan to allow for the expansion of the buildable area associated with this project. Requirements for stormwater management, parking, emergency access and traffic flow result in one of the remaining buildable areas being too small to accommodate potential businesses that may want to settle here. The information contained in this report is focused primarily on the modification to the native habitat and development areas proposed on the east side of Goodlette-Frank Road. This document provides information concerning the proposed project site as it relates to natural resources and environmental issues. It is submitted to Collier County in support of a zoning request made by the applicant. 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1224 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) Creekside Environmental Supplement May 15, 2020 Page 3 of 16 2. EXISTING CONDITIONS (Pre-Development) 2.1 VEGETATION ASSOCIATIONS The existing habitat types (based on FLUCFCS codes) are shown in Table 1 below and Exhibit 2 (FLUCFCS Map). Of the total 28.92 acres contained within the Creekside East property boundary, 81% classify as uplands (23.42 ac.) and 8% classify as wetlands (2.30 ac.). The majority of the property is relatively free of noxious exotic vegetation though a few species are present including melaleuca, Brazilian pepper and earleaf acacia. Table 1- FLUCFCS Codes & Acreages Wetland Habitat FLUCCS Code Acreage Mixed Wetland Forest 630 2.30 Other Surface Waters FLUCCS Code Acreage Drainage Canal 510 0.49 Stormwater Pond 534 3.06 Upland Habitat FLUCCS Code Acreage Commercial Services under Construction 140 6.57 Medical and Healthcare 174 7.19 Open Land 190 2.30 Urban Land in Transition 193 1.78 Pine Flatwood 411 1.59 Pine – Mesic Oak 414 1.06 Disturbed Land 743 0.17 Road and Highway 814 2.41 28.92 A list of plant species observed within each native habitat type is found below. Table 2- Typical Plant species by Habitat 411 – Pine Flatwoods, 1.59 acres 5% of site Melaleuca Melaleuca quinquenervia C, M Rare Slash Pine Pinus elliottii C, M Dominant Cabbage Palm Sabal palmetto C, M Occasional 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1225 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) Creekside Environmental Supplement May 15, 2020 Page 4 of 16 Earleaf Acacia Acacia auriculiformis C, M Occasional Brazilian Pepper Schinus terebinthifolia C, M & G Rare Saw Palmetto Serenoa repens M & G Rare Myrsine Myrsine guianensis M & G Common Wax Myrtle Myrica cerifera M & G Occasional Java Plum Syzgium cumini M Rare Greenbriar Smilax spp. V Occasional Grapevine Vitis rotundifolia V Occasional Poison Ivy Toxicodendron radicans V Common 414 – Pine – Mesic Oak, 1.06 acres 4% of site Slash Pine Pinus elliottii C, M Common Laurel Oak Quercus laurifolia C, M Common Cabbage Palm Sabal palmetto C, M Occasional Earleaf Acacia Acacia auriculiformis C, M Occasional Brazilian Pepper Schinus terebinthifolia C, M & G Rare Myrsine Myrsine guianensis M & G Common Wax Myrtle Myrica cerifera M & G Occasional Greenbriar Smilax spp. V Occasional Grapevine Vitis rotundifolia V Occasional Poison Ivy Toxicodendron radicans V Common 630 – Mixed Wetland Forest, 2.30 acres 8 % of site Cypress Taxodium distichum C & M Occasional Slash Pine Pinus elliottii C Common Carolina Willow Salix caroliniana M Occasional Cabbage Palm Sabal palmetto C, M & G Common Wax Myrtle Myrica cerifera M & G Occasional Pond Apple Annona glabra M Rare St. John’s Wort Hypericum fasciculatum G Occasional Virginia Chain Fern Woodwardia virginica G Occasional Swamp Fern Blechnum serrulatum G Dominant Sawgrass Cladium jamaicense G Occasional Blue Maidencane Amphicarpum muhlenbergianum G Occasional Beakrush Rhynchospora filifolia G Occasional Camphorweed Pluchea baccharis G Occasional Thoroughwort Eupatorium mikanioides G Occasional Saltbush Baccharis halimifolia G Occasional C = Canopy M = Midstory G = Groundcover V = Vine E = Epiphyte * - Protected species 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1226 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) Creekside Environmental Supplement May 15, 2020 Page 5 of 16 2.2 WETLANDS & OTHER SURFACE WATERS Qualified Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc. environmental staff inspected the project lands for the purpose of delineating wetlands and other surface waters. The wetland delineation methodologies and criteria set forth by the state (in Chapter 62-340, FAC, Delineation of the Landward Extent of Wetlands and Surface Waters) and the US Army Corps of Engineers (in the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual) were followed in determining whether an area classified as a wetland or other surface water and in delineating the limits (boundaries) of potential jurisdictional wetlands and other surface waters. 2.2.1 Wetland Seasonal High Water Table & Hydroperiod The hydrologic regime on these properties is extremely altered from historical levels and patterns by surrounding urban uses. Water from adjacent properties (storage facility and waste water treatment plant) runs onto the eastern site and flows through the wetland into the drainage canal along the eastern boundary. From there it flows north under Immokalee Road and into the Cocohatchee River. The isolated wetland area is in relatively good shape with respect to exotic vegetation but is isolated by commercial development to the point where minimal wildlife utilization occurs. With the site lying between development and major roadways, this wetland habitat does not maintain the normal hydrology that was historically present due to manipulation of surficial flows from the surrounding developments. 2.2.2 Jurisdictional Status of Wetlands & Other Surface Waters The Creekside wetland lines were established during the original permitting of the property and are assumed to be jurisdictional with the Federal permitting agencies per their delineation guidelines. The South Florida Water Management District identified the eastern wetland area as impacted during the previous permitting efforts and did not require any conservation easement to be placed on it. They treated the area as a part of the surface water management system for the property. The other surface waters on the site include the ponds and the ditch and swale system that currently transport water through the center of the western property and along the eastern boundary of the east property north under Immokalee Road. This system will be modified under the current proposal with a portion of the ponds being filled in and new areas constructed or expanded within the project boundaries. Likewise, the ditch and swale system on the eastern side will be modified to accommodate the revised parcel boundary. 2.3 LISTED PLANT & ANIMAL SPECIES A survey for listed animal and plant species has been conducted on the project lands by Turrell, Hall & Associates biologists. This threatened and endangered species survey and its results are discussed in the attached Listed Species Summary Report. The Listed Species summary describes 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1227 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) Creekside Environmental Supplement May 15, 2020 Page 6 of 16 the approximate locations where listed animal species were observed on and near the project lands during the course of the referenced survey. The majority of listed animal species observed were either flying over the project lands or observed on adjacent lands. During the survey events white ibis (Eudocimus albus) and several hawks flew over the site, while snowy egret (Egretta thula) and white ibis were seen adjacent to this property. A tri-colored heron (Egretta tricolor) was observed foraging along the lake bank. None of the listed species observed, reside on or nest on the project lands. Due to isolation and degradation of foraging habitat, it is apparent that this site offers only minimal value to local wildlife. The two major roadways on the north and west boundaries of the site as well as the development in all directions have isolated this property and made travel to it by terrestrial wildlife both difficult and dangerous. 2.4 HISTORICAL/ ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES The Florida Master Site File (MSF) is a database of the known historic and archaeological sites in the state of Florida. The MSF office was contacted during the initial permitting of the site and indicated that no recorded archaeological sites exist on the subject property or in close proximity. If a suspected archaeological or historical artifact is discovered during the course of site development activities (construction, clearing, etc.), the development activities at the specific site will be immediately halted and the appropriate agency notified. Development will be suspended for a sufficient length of time to enable the County or a designated consultant to assess the find and determine the proper course of action. 2.5 SOILS Based on the National Resource Conservation Service (NRCS) "Soil Survey of Collier County Area, Florida" (NRCS, 1998) there are five (5) different soil types (soil map units) present on the project lands. The attached exhibit provides a soils map for the project area as derived from the NRCS mapping. The following sub-sections provide a brief description of each soil map unit identified on the project lands. Information is provided about the soil's landscape position (i.e. it’s typical location in the landscape on a county-wide basis), the soil's profile (i.e. textural composition and thickness or depth range of the layers or horizons commonly present in the soil), and the soil's drainage and hydrologic characteristics. The soils occurring on project lands are as follows: (7) Immokalee Fine Sand (non-hydric) Landscape position – Flatwoods. Soil profile – Surface layer to a depth of about 6 inches consists of black fine sand. Subsurface layer to depth of about 35 inches consist of light gray fine sand. Subsoil layers below this to a depth of 58 inches consist of fine sand. Below these layers the subsoil is pale brown fine sand to a depth of about 80 inches. Drainage/Hydrologic characteristics – Poorly drained. Permeability is moderate. The seasonal high water table (apparent) is within a depth of 6 to 18 inches for 1 to 6 months and can recede to a 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1228 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) Creekside Environmental Supplement May 15, 2020 Page 7 of 16 depth of more than 40 inches during extended dry periods. Hydrologic group is B/D. (8) Myakka Fine Sand (non-hydric) Landscape position – Flatwoods. Soil profile – Surface layer to a depth of about 7 inches consists of dark grey fine sand. Subsurface layer to depth of about 27 inches consist of light gray to light brown fine sand. Subsoil layers below this to a depth of 48 inches consist of black fine sand. Below these layers the subsoil is yellowish brown fine sand to a depth of about 80 inches. Drainage/Hydrologic characteristics – Poorly drained. Permeability is moderate. The seasonal high water table (apparent) is within a depth of 6 to 18 inches for 1 to 6 months and can recede to a depth of more than 40 inches during extended dry periods. Hydrologic group is B/D. (17) Basinger Fine Sand (hydric) Landscape position – Sloughs and poorly defined drainageways. Soil profile – Surface layer to a depth of about 3 inches consists of dark grayish brown fine sand. Subsurface layer to depth of about 25 inches consist of light gray fine sand. Subsurface layers below this to a depth of 44 inches consist of brown fine sand. Limestone bedrock begins at a depth of about 80 inches. Drainage/Hydrologic characteristics – Poorly drained. Permeability is rapid. The seasonal high water table (apparent) is within a depth of 12 inches for 3 to 6 months and can recede to a depth of more than 40 inches during extended dry periods. Hydrologic group is B/D. (20) Ft. Drum and Malabar High Fine Sands (non-hydric) Landscape position – Ridges along sloughs. Soil profile – The surface layer is typically a very dark grayish brown fine sand about 5 inches thick. The subsurface is fine sand to a depth of about 20 inches. The subsoil is light brownish gray fine sand to a depth of about 80 inches. Limestone bedrock is at a depth of around 30 inches. Drainage/Hydrologic characteristics – Poorly drained. Permeability is rapid for Ft. Drum to slow for Malabar . Under natural conditions, the seasonal high water table (apparent) is set at a depth of 6 to 18 inches for 1 to 6 months during most years. During the other months, the water table is below a depth of 18 inches, and it recedes to a depth of more than 40 inches during extended dry periods. Hydrologic group is C. (39) Satellite Fine Sand (non-hydric) Landscape position – Low coastal ridges. Soil profile – Surface layer to a depth of about 3 inches consists of gray fine sand. Subsurface layers below this to a depth of 80 inches consist of light gray to white fine sand. Limestone bedrock begins at a depth of about 55 inches. Drainage/Hydrologic characteristics – Well drained. Permeability is very rapid. The seasonal high 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1229 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) Creekside Environmental Supplement May 15, 2020 Page 8 of 16 water table (apparent) is within a depth of 24 to 42 inches for 1 to 6 months and can recede to a depth of more than 42 inches during the rest of the year. Hydrologic group is C. 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1230 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) Creekside Environmental Supplement May 15, 2020 Page 9 of 16 3. PROPOSED CONDITIONS (Post-Development) 3.1 PROPOSED PROJECT The proposed project is to modify some of the individual parcel boundaries to allow for modified buildings and uses. The proposed modifications will also impact existing native habitat as outlined in this report. The enclosed exhibits illustrate the development and preserve areas that currently exist and that proposed changes that would result following this amendment. A commercial and/or industrial development will be required to preserve 15% of the native vegetation that was present at the time of the original approvals. County staff have indicated that this equates to 7.00 acres based on past CPUD approval. The proposed project will impact approximately 1.87 acres of the existing native habitat preserve on the site. The proposed impacts include about 1.18 acres of wetlands and 0.69 acre of uplands. The preserve area has been degraded by isolation and hydrological impacts. The enclosed exhibits illustrate the areas that will be impacted and created by the proposed development changes. The proposed project modifications will result in the loss of existing on-site native habitat. Should the project modification be approved, the remaining native preserve area within the PUD boundary will be 5.13 acres. The applicant has committed to providing a minimum of 1.87 acres of native preserve through an off-site source. 3.2 PROJECT IMPACTS TO WETLANDS 3.2.1 Direct, Permanent Impacts Changes proposed to the project will result in wetland impacts. However, the wetlands that will be impacted have already been deemed impacted by the SFWMD during the original permitting efforts on the project site. The condition and status of the wetlands as well as their use as a stormwater conveyance from properties to the south, made it difficult to preserve them in a viable condition once the development was permitted so the SFWMD included this area in the original impact calculations. However, because the Corps did not account for these impacts in previous permitting, mitigation for these impacts will be provided under the current USACE permit. The project will result in direct, permanent impacts to a total of 1.18 acres of wetland area. As used herein, the term "direct impacts" refers to actions that will result in the complete elimination of jurisdictional areas (i.e. excavation and fill). The wetland area to be impacted was assessed utilizing the UMAM assessment methodology and has a value of 0.40 functional units per acre. Therefore, the project will require 0.47 wetland credits to compensate for the proposed impacts. 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1231 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) Creekside Environmental Supplement May 15, 2020 Page 10 of 16 3.2.2 Temporary Impacts No temporary impacts are expected with this development. Prior to construction commencement all remaining preserve areas will be enclosed with siltation-prevention devices, which will remain in place until the adjacent construction is completed. 3.2.3 Secondary Impacts to Wetlands & Water Resources The previous permitting of the project's development features already accounted for and mitigated for the direct impact to all on-site wetlands so no secondary impacts will occur. Adjacent properties are already developed so no secondary impacts to off-site wetlands is expected either. Table 3- Preserves, Impacts and Secondary Impacts Wetland Habitat FLUCCS Code Total Acreage Direct Impacts Secondary Impacts Preserve Mixed Wetland Forest 630 2.30 1.18 0.00 1.12 Totals 2.30 1.18 0.00 1.12 Upland Habitat FLUCCS Code Total Acreage Impacts Preserves Oak Pine Community 414 1.06 0.64 0.42 Pine Flatwood 411 1.59 0.06 1.53 Totals 2.65 0.69 1.95 ** Acreages in Table 3 above apply to preserve area on East side of Goodlette road only. Acreage discrepancy of 0.01 acre is a result of rounding error. 3.3 PROJECT IMPACTS TO LISTED SPECIES A survey for listed animal and plant species was conducted on the project lands by Turrell, Hall & Associates biologists. This listed species survey and its results are discussed in the attached Listed Species summary. The listed animals associated with these project lands as observed directly or indirectly by Turrell, Hall & Associates included the white ibis, and snowy egret. Currently the closest documented a ctive eagle’s nest is approximately 2.5 mile northwest of the project lands. A tri-colored heron was observed foraging along the lake banks. White ibis and snowy egrets were also observed perched in trees on the Creekside East property. White ibis and snowy egret were also observed on the open mowed lands to the east of the project site. 3.4 PROJECT IMPACTS TO ARCHAEOLOGICAL/ HISTORICAL RESOURCES As outlined in Section 2.4 of this report, it does not appear that development of the Creekside property will impact any historic properties listed, or eligible for listing, in the National Register of Historic Places or otherwise of historical, architectural, or archaeological value. If a suspected archaeological or historical artifact is discovered during the course of site development activities (construction, clearing, etc.), the development activities at the specific site will be immediately 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1232 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) Creekside Environmental Supplement May 15, 2020 Page 11 of 16 halted and the appropriate agency notified. Development will be suspended for a sufficient length of time to enable the County or a designated consultant to assess the find and determine the proper course of action. 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1233 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) Creekside Environmental Supplement May 15, 2020 Page 12 of 16 4.0 PRESERVE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM The Creekside preserve areas have an existing approved management plan. The proposed preserves will continue to be managed as outlined in the approved plan. Preserve areas will be maintained to suppress infestation by exotic/invasive and nuisance plant species. Maintenance/management actions will be conducted as required to meet the success criteria as outlined in the plan as well as to insure stormwater management capacity as required under the drainage easement. The Preserve Management Plan outlines the maintenance activities proposed within the preserve areas associated with the project. It also outlines any monitoring efforts that may be done to track and document the success of the maintenance efforts. Follow-up exotic and nuisance plant control will include directed herbicide applications and/or physical removal methods throughout all portions of the preserve area. Exotic/nuisance plant control is likely to occur on at least an annual basis. Such maintenance events may be conducted more frequently if field observations indicate the need. At the end of this period, the frequency of activities necessary to adequately control nuisance and exotic plants will be re-assessed and a program developed for future maintenance. At a minimum there will be at least one exotic/nuisance plant control event per year of monitoring. Supplemental plantings will be conducted as necessary when and where survivorship, density, and/or percent cover goals are not achieved. The need for such re-plantings will typically be assessed on an annual basis. Management/maintenance activities may include removal of dead, dying, or diseased plants (both planted and existing plants) as deemed necessary. Any work necessary to accommodate the stormwater drainage aspects of the area will also be undertaken to insure no adverse hydrological impacts occur to upstream properties. A qualified biologist or similar environmental professional will inspect the preserve area at least once a year for the duration of the monitoring program. The necessary maintenance activities will be determined by the biologist during these inspections. The maintenance will be conducted during the course of the year following issuance of the biologist's recommendations. The preserve area will be maintained in perpetuity such that the total vegetative cover accounted for by nuisance plants constitutes no more than 5% of total plant cover. All exotic plants will be removed from the preserves as part of the maintenance events. 4.1 PROTECTION OF PRESERVES VIA CONSERVATION EASEMENTS Since the SFWMD has permitted these areas as impacted, and because of the underlaying drainage aspects associated, they will not accept conservation easements over them. These areas are included in the Collier County native vegetation requirement but because of the drainage component associated with the area, they will likewise not accept a conservation easement over the remaining area due to the possibility that drainage improvements or maintenance may need to occur sometime in the future. 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1234 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) Creekside Environmental Supplement May 15, 2020 Page 13 of 16 4.2 PRESERVE ENHANCEMENT VIA MAINTENANCE & ERADICATION OF EXOTIC & NUISANCE PLANT SPECIES The preserve area will be maintained in perpetuity to ensure that the areas are free from exotic/invasive plant species immediately following maintenance events. Exotic invasive plant species will include Category I and Category II species identified in the current “Invasive Plant List” published by the Florida Exotic Pest Plan Council (FLEPPC) as well as Class I and Class II Prohibited Aquatic Plants listed in Chapter 62C-52.011, Florida Administrative Code. Nuisance plant species will include native plant species deemed detrimental due to their potential adverse competition with desirable native species. Visual inspections for exotic, non-native and nuisance plant invasion will be conducted annually, at a minimum, and all exotic, non-native and nuisance vegetation found within the preserve areas will be flagged, mapped and reported for treatment. Felled material will be removed from the preserve areas where possible or killed in place where removal would cause extreme damage to the surrounding native areas. Any stumps remaining after the exotic, non-native and nuisance removal will be treated with a U.S. EPA approved herbicide and visible tracer dye to prevent regeneration from the roots. These maintenance activities will be performed in perpetuity as needed. 4.3 PRESERVE DELINEATION Preserves will be clearly delineated with appropriate signage both during and after construction activities. Protective barricades will be used to cordon off construction areas and keep construction equipment out of preserve areas. A double row of silt fence will be used along preserve areas to separate them from the construction activities. The silt fence will remain in place until the perimeter berm is installed around the area of work. Appropriate signage will be placed along the perimeter of the preserves at 100 to 150 foot spacing. 4.4 PRESERVE MANAGEMENT SPECIFICATIONS The preserve area will require exotic and nuisance plant eradication activities as previously noted. The following paragraphs provide additional information and specifications regarding these activities. 4.4.1 Exotic & Nuisance Vegetation Eradication As previously noted, eradication methods will be employed throughout the preserve area. They may include physical removal of exotics and/or directed herbicide applications as dictated by the mitigation feature type and specific conditions and species encountered. Initial exotic and nuisance plant eradication efforts will involve a combination of methods including directed herbicide applications and cutting down exotics with subsequent application of herbicides to the stumps. Non-mechanized exotic and nuisance plant 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1235 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) Creekside Environmental Supplement May 15, 2020 Page 14 of 16 eradication methods will be employed wherever practical in order to preserve the greatest amount of existing native vegetation still present within the preserve areas. Methods include the use of hand implements such as chainsaws and machetes to cut down exotic vegetation with follow-up applications of herbicides as well as directed herbicide applications alone. Areas of exotic eradication handled in this manner will be allowed to recruit naturally for a year before determining if any replanting is necessary. Following initial eradication, subsequent maintenance events will commonly employ non- mechanized exotic and nuisance plant eradication methods. These methods may include directed herbicide applications and/or physical removal of exotics. 4.4.2 Success Criteria The success criterion of this preserve is 80% total coverage of desirable and appropriate plant species in each habitat. If supplemental plantings are required after time zero activities are completed, then there will also be a requirement for 80% survivorship of all plantings. This criterion is already met within the native habitat areas. 4.4.3 Monitoring & Reporting The Creekside East preserve area will be maintained and monitored on an annual basis, with more frequent maintenance events undertaken if vegetation is overrun by any exotics that need more frequent treatment. Monitoring will be conducted within 30 days of a maintenance event, but not prior to 10 days immediately following herbicide application. Any faunal observations, direct or indirect will also be noted and reported during each site visit. Since the preserve area has been deemed impacted by the regulatory agencies, no monitoring or reporting will be required by them. Monitoring summaries will be produced and kept by the property owner for review by the County upon request. 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1236 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) Creekside Environmental Supplement May 15, 2020 Page 15 of 16 5.0 PRESERVE MONITORING PROGRAM The permittee will not submit monitoring reports to the SFWMD or USACE as the preserve area has already been deemed impacted by these agencies. Monitoring summaries will be produced if required by the County which will include the following information: 1. Brief description of maintenance and/or management work performed since the previous monitoring report along with discussion of any other significant occurrences. 2. Brief description of anticipated maintenance/management work to be conducted over the next year. 3. A summary of rainfall data collected during the year preceding the monitoring report based on rainfall data recorded at an onsite station. 4. Photographs documenting conditions in the preserve area at the time of monitoring. Photos will be taken at four permanent photo stations within the on-site Preserve. At least two photos will be taken at each station with the view of each photo always oriented in the same general direction from one year to the next. 5. Other general observations made in various portions of the preserve area. These observations will address potential problem zones, general condition of native vegetation including planted species, wildlife utilization as observed during monitoring, and other pertinent factors. 6. A summary assessment of all data and observations along with recommendations as to actions necessary to help meet management/maintenance goals. 7. A summary of all observed wildlife sightings and evidence of wildlife utilization. 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1237 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) Creekside Environmental Supplement May 15, 2020 Page 16 of 16 6.0 WETLAND MITIGATION PROGRAM The original Creekside East project permitting accounted for impacts to the preserve area so no additional wetland mitigation should be required by the State regulatory agencies. The USACE had previously indicated that the impacts will require additional mitigation and the applicant is proposing to compensate for the wetland impacts via the purchase of 0.47 wetland mitigation credits from the Panther Island Mitigation Bank Expansion. Table 4- UMAM Summary Wetland Habitat FLUCFCS Code Total Acreage Existing UMAM Score Proposed UMAM Score Delta Mitigation Requirement Mixed Wetland Forest 630 1.18 0.40 0.00 -0.40 0.47 Totals 2.30 1.18 1.12 0.47 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1238 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) STATE OF FLORIDACOUNTY AERIAL VICINITY MAPSTATE OF FLORIDACOUNTY AERIAL VICINITY MAPNOTES:<> THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SUBJECTPROPERTYSUBJECTPROPERTY<> LATITUDE:N 26° 16' 15.542"<> LONGITUDE:W 81° 47' 18.663"SITE ADDRESS:<> GOODLETTE FRANK RDNAPLES, FL 34105Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@turrell-associates.com3584 Exchange Ave. Suite B. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\1335-creekside east\CAD\SHEET\PERMIT-FEDERAL\1335-CREEKSIDE-FED.dwg LOCATION MAP 5/12/2020THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY:CHANGED:SHEET NO.:THRMJ09-27-131335RMJ2725CREEKSIDELOCATION MAP48RMJ---09-14-1605-12-20---THTH---REVISED PAGES 02,05,06,08REVISED PAGES 02-07---01 OF 10COLLIER COUNTYCOLLIER COUNTY)7.(1(/':+%1)7.(1(/':+%18588288641MARCOISLANDEVERGLADESCITY9329846NAPLES90908399483783784129292983983992887846951862I-758486431856850846890896NESWKEY WESTTAMPAFT.MYERSMIAMINAPLESSUBJECTPROPERTY9.A.4.dPacket Pg. 1239Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) NESW0100200400SCALE IN FEETTurrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@turrell-associates.com3584 Exchange Ave. Suite B. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\1335-creekside east\CAD\SHEET\PERMIT-FEDERAL\1335-CREEKSIDE-FED.dwg FLUCCS MAP 5/12/2020THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY:CHANGED:SHEET NO.:THRMJ09-27-131335RMJ2725CREEKSIDEFLUCCS MAP48RMJ---09-14-1605-12-20---THTH---REVISED FLUCCSREVISED FLUCCS---02 OF 10·SURVEY COURTESY OF:··SURVEY DATED:NOTES:·THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY ANDARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE."NO SURVEY DATA AVAILABLE"MM-DD-YYYY510411193193630534534743140414GOODLETTE-FRANK RDIMMOKALEE RDSITEPROPERTY174190174814814 FLUCCSCODEDESCRIPTIONAREA(AC)140COMMERCIAL AND SERVICES6.57174MEDICAL AND HEALTH CARE7.19190OPEN LAND2.30193URBAN LAND IN TRANSITION1.78411PINE FLATWOODS1.59414PINE - MESIC OAK1.06510STREAMS AND WATERWAYS0.49534STORMWATER MANAGEMENT LAKE3.06630WETLAND FORESTED MIXED2.30743SPOIL AREAS0.17814ROADS AND HIGHWAYS2.41TOTAL28.929.A.4.dPacket Pg. 1240Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) TLOADINGZONELOADINGZONELOADINGZONE LOADINGZONELOADINGZONE LOADINGZONE NESW0100200400SCALE IN FEETTurrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@turrell-associates.com3584 Exchange Ave. Suite B. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\1335-creekside east\CAD\SHEET\PERMIT-FEDERAL\1335-CREEKSIDE-FED.dwg PROPOSED SITE ON AERIAL 5/12/2020THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY:CHANGED:SHEET NO.:THRMJ09-27-131335RMJ2725CREEKSIDEPROPOSED SITE ON AERIAL48RMJ---09-14-1605-12-20---THTH---REVISED SITEPLANREVISED SITEPLAN---04 of 10PROPOSEDPONDGOODLETTE-FRANK RDIMMOKALEE RDSITEPROPERTYP R E S E R V E PROPOSEDBUILDINGANDPARKINGPOTENTIALDEVELOPMENTAREA9.A.4.dPacket Pg. 1241Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) TLOADINGZONELOADINGZONELOADINGZONE LOADINGZONELOADINGZONE LOADINGZONE NESW0100200400SCALE IN FEETTurrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@turrell-associates.com3584 Exchange Ave. Suite B. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\1335-creekside east\CAD\SHEET\PERMIT-FEDERAL\1335-CREEKSIDE-FED.dwg IMPACTS MAP 5/12/2020THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY:CHANGED:SHEET NO.:THRMJ09-27-131335RMJ2725CREEKSIDEWETLAND IMPACTS MAP48----05-12-20----TH----REVISED SITEPLAN----05 of 10PROPOSEDPONDGOODLETTE-FRANK RDIMMOKALEE RD·SURVEY COURTESY OF:··SURVEY DATED:NOTES:·THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY ANDARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE."NO SURVEY DATA AVAILABLE"MM-DD-YYYY1.18WETLAND IMPACT (AC)SITEPROPERTYWETLANDIMPACTSAREAPROPOSEDBUILDINGANDPARKINGPOTENTIALDEVELOPMENTAREA9.A.4.dPacket Pg. 1242Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) TLOADINGZONELOADINGZONELOADINGZONELOADINGZONELOADINGZONELOADINGZONENESW0100200400SCALE IN FEETTurrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@turrell-associates.com3584 Exchange Ave. Suite B. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\1335-creekside east\CAD\SHEET\PERMIT-FEDERAL\1335-CREEKSIDE-FED.dwg PROPOSED PRESERVE 5/12/2020THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY:CHANGED:SHEET NO.:THRMJ09-27-131335RMJ2725CREEKSIDEPROPOSED PRESERVE48----05-12-20----TH----REVISED SITEPLAN----06 OF 10GOODLETTE-FRANK RDIMMOKALEE RD1.121.53 ·SURVEY COURTESY OF:··SURVEY DATED:NOTES:·THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY ANDARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE."NO SURVEY DATA AVAILABLE"MM-DD-YYYYUPLAND PRESERVE (ACRES):WETLAND PRESERVE (ACRES):TOTAL PRESERVE (ACRES):3.071.121.95SITEPROPERTY0.090.339.A.4.dPacket Pg. 1243Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) NESW0100200400SCALE IN FEETTurrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@turrell-associates.com3584 Exchange Ave. Suite B. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\1335-creekside east\CAD\SHEET\PERMIT-FEDERAL\1335-CREEKSIDE-FED.dwg SOILS MAP 5/12/2020THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY:CHANGED:SHEET NO.:THRMJ09-27-131335-2725CREEKSIDESOILS MAP48-------------------08 OF 10·SURVEY COURTESY OF:··SURVEY DATED:NOTES:·THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY ANDARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.·SOIL DATA PROVIDED BY:1998 UNITED STATES DEPT OF AGRICULTURESOIL SURVEY OF COLLIER COUNTY AREA, FL"NO SURVEY DATA AVAILABLE"MM-DD-YYYYCODEDESCRIPTIONHYDRIC7IMMOKALEE FINE SAND17BASINGER FINE SANDYES20FT. DRUM AND MALABAR, HIGH, FINESANDS39SATELLITE FINE SAND7201739SITEPROPERTY9.A.4.dPacket Pg. 1244Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) NESW0100200400SCALE IN FEETTurrell, Hall & Associates, Inc.Email: tuna@turrell-associates.com3584 Exchange Ave. Suite B. Naples, FL 34104-3732Marine & Environmental ConsultingPhone: (239) 643-0166Fax: (239) 643-6632REV#:CREATED:DRAWN BY:JOB NO.:SECTION-TOWNSHIP-RANGE-DESIGNED:p:\1335-creekside east\CAD\SHEET\PERMIT-FEDERAL\1335-CREEKSIDE-FED.dwg SPECIES MAP 5/12/2020THESE DRAWINGS ARE FOR PERMITTING PURPOSES ONLY AND ARE NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTION USE.SE1.2.3.4.5.REV BY:DATE:CHK BY:CHANGED:SHEET NO.:THRMJ09-27-131335RMJ2725CREEKSIDESPECIES MAP48----04-14-20----TH----REVISED SITEPLAN----09 of 10GOODLETTE-FRANK RDIMMOKALEE RD SITEPROPERTY*XTRI COLORED HERONTYPICAL TRANSECT*CAVITY TREESSNOWY EGRETWHITE IBISX9.A.4.dPacket Pg. 1245Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) THREATENED AND ENDANGERED SPECIES SURVEY CREEKSIDE EAST 2600 Golden Gate Parkway Naples, FL 34105 updated MARCH 2020 PREPARED BY: TURRELL, HALL & ASSOCIATES, INC 3584 EXCHANGE AVENUE, STE B NAPLES, FL 34104 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1246 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) CREEKSIDE EAST THREATENED AND ENDANGERED SPECIES SURVEY MARCH 2020 2 I. INTRODUCTION The Creekside East project encompasses a total of approximately 28.9 acres. The property is located in section 27, township 48 South, and Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. The owner is considering development of the parcel associated with the Creekside Commerce Park Commercial Planned Unit Development. The project parcel is located on the southeast corner of Immokalee Rd. and Goodlette Frank Rd. intersection, in North Naples. The project is bordered to the north by Immokalee Rd., the west by Goodlette Frank Rd., the south by the North Collier water treatment facility and the Pelican Marsh PUD, and to the east by additional commercial development. The intent of this report is to provide a summary of wildlife observations on the property and to consider potential effects of the proposed project on any local, state or federal listed species that may utilize the property for feeding/foraging and/or nesting. This survey updates a 2008 protected species survey conducted by Johnson Engineering and 2013 and 2015 surveys conducted by Turrell, Hall and Associates. This latest survey update was specific to observations for Florida bonneted bat roosts. II. METHODOLOGY Prior to any wildlife survey, careful consideration is given to the habitat type/s in question and species that are known to utilize such areas. Thus, before any survey is carried out a number of publications and references are consulted. These include: The Official Lists of Florida’s Endangered Species, Florida Game and Freshwater Fish Commission (FGFWFC) Wildlife Methodology Guidelines, Survey Protocol for SFWMD projects, Collier County aerial research, US Fish and Wildlife listed species survey protocols, and the Florida Natural Areas Inventory (FNAI) for Collier County. The basic objective of any wildlife survey is to obtain evidence that a listed species is using the subject site. The site may comprise a primary or secondary feeding/foraging or nesting zone or merely be adjacent to those sites for a particular listed species. As many species of concern in Florida are cryptic/camouflaged and/or nocturnal/crepuscular, patience and sufficient time must be devoted to the survey. Aerial photos and FLUCFCS mapping of the site and surrounding area were consulted before arriving on-site and after thorough consideration of the existing habitats a potential list of species that could be found on-site was developed. A system of linear transects was followed along essentially an east-west orientation throughout the subject property. Transects were walked during both morning and afternoon time frames to examine the site. Particular emphasis was put on looking for evidence of tree cavities as well as fox squirrels, gopher tortoises, indigo snakes, other species that have the potential to occur. Biologists traversed the site in a series of linear transects spaced approximately 40 to 60 feet apart. 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1247 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) CREEKSIDE EAST THREATENED AND ENDANGERED SPECIES SURVEY MARCH 2020 3 Fieldwork took place in September 2013, October 2015, September 2016, and more recently updated February 2020. Approximately 30 hours have been spent on the site to date devoted to wildlife survey. The October 2016 update was to survey the site for cavity trees that could potentially support bonneted bat roosting. The recent 2020 survey was conducted to review the cavities located in 2016 and search for any additional if present. Two cavities located in oak trees and one cavity in a dead cabbage palm tree were observed. All three were peeped and no evidence of bat roosting was observed. A list of survey dates, times, and ambient weather conditions is provided below. SURVEY DATE TIMES SURVEYED TEMP (ºF) WIND (MPH) WEATHER 09/09/2013 0700 – 1000 75 5-10 Clear 09/11/2013 1500 – 1800 80 15-20 Cloudy 09/18/2013 0700 – 1000 75 0 - 5 Partly cloudy 09/24/2013 1530 – 1830 75 15 – 25 Cloudy / Rain 10/08/2015 1600 - 1930 85 5-10 Clear 10/17/2015 0700 - 1000 74 5-10 Partly Cloudy 9/02/2016 0800-1100 77 10-15 Cloudy 09/05/2016 0700-1000 73 Calm Clear 01/24/2020 0700-1000 64 Calm Clear 02/22/2020 0700-0900 58 15-20 Partly Cloudy A slow pace was walked throughout the entire site, stopping every few minutes to look and listen for movement or calls of any animal. Indirect evidence such as rootings, scrape marks, nests, cavities, burrows, tracks and scat were looked for and noted. III. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION A list of protected species that could be expected to occur on the subject site can be given through analysis of known vegetative communities both on-site and contiguous to the site and available background data. Sources include the Fish and Wildlife Service Multi Species Recovery Plan, Part 2, Appendix C, Species of Concern and their Respective Community Types in South Florida, in addition to communication with personnel at state and federal wildlife agencies. Vegetative communities are presented by FLUCFCS codes together with potential listed wildlife species. Consideration of the suitability and likelihood for a given community to support a particular species is given in light of adjacent and contiguous land uses. Abbreviations used in the discussion are as follows; 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1248 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) CREEKSIDE EAST THREATENED AND ENDANGERED SPECIES SURVEY MARCH 2020 4 Vegetative Species Abbreviations Stratum Abundance C = Canopy C = Common M = Midstory O = Occasional G = Groundcover R = Rare Listed Species Abbreviations F = Federal C = Federal Candidate S = State *= FWS Species of Management Concern E = Endangered R = Rare T = Threatened SSC = Florida Species of Special Concern FLUCFCS CODE 193 Urban Land Common Name Scientific Name Stratum Abundance Bahia grass Paspalum notatum G C Smooth buttonweed Spermacoce assurgens G O Frog fruit Phyla nodiflora G C Mexican clover Richardia grandiflora G R The following species are common within this community type and can potentially be found there; Gopher Tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus), Sandhill Crane (Grus canadensis pratensis, ST), Audubons Crested Caracara (Polyborus plancus audubinii, FT, ST), Eastern Indigo Snake (Drymarchon corais couperi, FT, ST). FLUCFCS CODE 411 (E1) Pine Flatwoods (<25% exotics) Common Name Scientific Name Stratum Abundance Slash pine Pinus elliotti C C Cabbage palm Sabal palmetto M/C O Laurel oak Quercus laurifolia C O Ear-leaf acacia Acacia auriculiformis M/C R Melaleuca Melaleuca quinquenervia M/C O Brazilian pepper Schinus terebinthifolius M O Downy rose-myrtle Rhodomyrtus tomentosa M C Myrsine Rapanea punctata M C Gallberry Ilex glabra M C Wax myrtle Myrica cerifera M C Saw palmetto Serenoa repens M C Greenbriar Smilax spp. V C Muscadine grape Vitis rotundifolia V C The following potential species are common within the community type Pine Flatwoods; Gopher Tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus), Florida Weasel (Mustela frenaata peninsulae, 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1249 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) CREEKSIDE EAST THREATENED AND ENDANGERED SPECIES SURVEY MARCH 2020 5 R), Big Cypress Fox Squirrel (Sciurus niger avicennia, *), Florida Black Bear (Ursus americanus floridanus, FC, ST), Florida Panther (Puma concolor coryi, FE, SE), White Ibis (Eudocimus albus, SSC), Sandhill Crane (Grus canadensis pratensis, ST), Bald Eagle (Haliaetus leucocephalus, FT, ST), Red Cockaded Woodpecker (Picoides borealis, FE, ST), Audubons Crested Caracara (Polyborus plancus audubinii, FT, ST), Eastern Indigo Snake (Drymarchon corais couperi, FT, ST). Of the above potential listed species, none were observed on this or surrounding parcels during the course of this survey. There is a slight possibility for utilization by gopher tortoise, indigo snake, and fox squirrel; however, the amount of directly adjacent traffic and lack of continuity with other undeveloped parcels significantly minimizes that potential. FLUCFCS CODE 510 and 534 Canal and Pond Common Name Scientific Name Stratum Abundance Primrose willow Ludwigia peruviana M R Carolina willow Salix caroliniana M R Torpedo grass Panicum repens G C Pennywort Hydrocotyle umbellata G O Arrowhead Sagittaria lancifolia G O Spikerush Eleocharis cellulosa G O This community type generally supports foraging activities of listed wading birds such as American Alligator (Alligator mississippiensis SSC, FT S/A), White Ibis (Eudocimus albus, SSC), Sandhill Crane (Grus canadensis pratensis, ST), Limpkin (Aramus guarauna, SSC), Wood Stork (Mycteria americana, FE, SE), Little Blue Heron (Egretta caerulea SSC), Snowy Egret (Egretta thula SSC), Tri-colored Heron (Egretta tricolor SSC) Of the above potential listed species, only the tri-colored heron was observed foraging along the lake bank. White ibis and snowy egret were also observed perched in trees adjacent to the lake. It is probable that several other species will also utilize the shorelines for foraging activities over the course of the year. The Johnson Engineering survey from 2008 documented an alligator within the existing stormwater pond. Recognition that some species may utilize the site along with proper management to prevent impacts associated with this development proposal should be incorporated into the final species management plan for the property. FLUCFCS CODE 630 Wetland mixed forest Common Name Scientific Name Stratum Abundance Cypress Taxodium distichum C C Cabbage palm Sabal palmetto M/C O Laurel oak Quercus laurifolia C O 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1250 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) CREEKSIDE EAST THREATENED AND ENDANGERED SPECIES SURVEY MARCH 2020 6 Carolina willow Salix caroliniana M O Pond Apple Annona glabra M C Brazilian pepper Schinus terebinthifolius M R Buttonbush Cephalanthus occidentalis M O Myrsine Rapanea punctata M R Swamp lily Crinum americanum G C Leather fern Acrostichum danaeifolium G O Swamp fern Blechnum serrulatum G C This community type generally supports foraging activities of many listed wading birds such as White Ibis (Eudocimus albus, SSC), Little Blue Heron (Egretta caerulea SSC), Snowy Egret (Egretta thula SSC), and Tri-colored Heron (Egretta tricolor SSC). In addition, the following potential species are also possible within this community type; Florida Weasel (Mustela frenaata peninsulae, R), Big Cypress Fox Squirrel (Sciurus niger avicennia, *), Florida Black Bear (Ursus americanus floridanus, FC, ST), Florida Panther (Puma concolor coryi, FE, SE). As documented above, none of these species were observed within this community during the survey efforts. The amount of directly adjacent traffic and isolation of this parcel due to the lack of continuity with other undeveloped parcels significantly minimizes the potential that listed species will utilize the site. A list of all wildlife species observed on or adjacent to the site is provided below. Common Name Scientific Name Fish and Aquatic Invertebrates Mosquito fish Gambusia affinis Least killifish Heterandria formosa Golden topminnow Fundulus chrysotus Sailfin molly Poecilia latipinna Sunfish Lepomis spp. Walking catfish Clarias batrachus Unidentified cichlids Reptiles & Amphibians Cuban treefrog Osteopilus septentrionalis Green treefrog Hyla cinerea Eastern narrowmouth toad Gastrophryne carolinensis Florida cooter Pseudemys floridana Florida soft-shelled turtle Apalone ferox Green anole Anolis carolinensis Birds Anhinga * Anhinga anhinga 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1251 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) CREEKSIDE EAST THREATENED AND ENDANGERED SPECIES SURVEY MARCH 2020 7 Snowy egret Egretta thula Tricolored heron Egretta tricolor Green-backed heron Butorides striatus White ibis Eudocimus albus Cattle egret Bubulcus ibis Mourning Dove Zenaida macroura Red-bellied woodpecker Melanerpes carolinus Cardinal Cardinalis cardinalis Red shouldered hawk* Buteo lineatus Turkey Vulture * Cathartes aura Mockingbird Mimus polyglottos Unidentified warblers Mammals Nine-banded armadillo Dasypus novemcinctus Marsh rabbit (scat and tracks) Sylvilagus palustris Grey squirrel Sciurus carolinensis Raccoon (tracks) Procyon lotor * Observed on adjacent properties or flying overhead. IV. SUMMARY As can be seen from the list above, this site supports a very limited amount of wildlife, consisting mostly of transient and generalist species. The site is located next to a major intersection and confined by commercial, residential, and industrial properties. At the time of the initial September 2013 survey, extremely high rainfall amounts from the past month had the site completely inundated with between 2 to 8 inches of water. This served to concentrate species along the higher perimeter regions of the site. The 2015 and 2016 follow up surveys were done only on the small wetland area and adjacent stormwater pond as the rest of the site was under construction. Likewise, this 2020 update also concentrated solely on the forested and lake portion of the site. The property is outside of the buffer zones for any known bald eagle nests. No evidence of bald eagles or bald eagle nest construction was observed during the course of this or any previous survey. The property is within the 18.6 mile core foraging area for the Corkscrew wood stork rookery. No wood stork foraging was observed during the survey but it is possible that periodic wood stork and other wading bird foraging may be occurring along the canal and lake shorelines. This activity will be able to continue with the proposed development so no adverse impacts to these species are expected. No evidence of any potential bonneted bat roosting sites was observed during the survey. This survey also concentrated on the small wetland area and was specifically aimed at locating potential FBB roost sites. While three cavities were observed and peeped, no evidence of any FBB roosting activity was observed. 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1252 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) CREEKSIDE EAST THREATENED AND ENDANGERED SPECIES SURVEY MARCH 2020 8 No listed plants were observed during the survey. It is our opinion that the development of this site with appropriate management and educational guidelines in place, will not adversely affect any endangered, threatened or otherwise protected species. These guidelines for management will be coordinated with the appropriate local, state, and federal agencies to better ensure their protection. 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1253 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) Traffic Impact Analysis Creekside Apartments Creekside Commerce Park – Commercial Planned Unit Development (CPUD) Amendment Collier County, FL 06/18/2020 Prepared for: Prepared by: Barron Collier Companies 2600 Golden Gate Parkway Naples, FL 34105 Phone: 239.262.2600 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA 2800 Davis Boulevard, Suite 200 Naples, FL 34104 Phone: 239.566.9551 Email: ntrebilcock@trebilcock.biz Collier County Transportation Methodology Fee* – $500.00 Collier County Transportation Review Fee – Small Scale Study – No Fee Note – *to be collected at time of first submittal 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1254 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) Creekside Apartments – Creekside Commerce Park – CPUD Amendment – Traffic Impact Analysis – June 2020 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e | 2 Statement of Certification I certify that this Traffic Impact Analysis has been prepared by me or under my immediate supervision and that I have experience and training in the field of Traffic and Transportation Engineering. Norman J. Trebilcock, AICP, P.E. FL Registration No. 47116 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA 2800 Davis Boulevard, Suite 200 Naples, FL 34104 Company Cert. of Auth. No. 27796 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1255 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) Creekside Apartments – Creekside Commerce Park – CPUD Amendment – Traffic Impact Analysis – June 2020 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e | 3 Table of Contents Project Description ......................................................................................................................... 4 Trip Generation ............................................................................................................................... 5 Conclusion ....................................................................................................................................... 6 Appendices Appendix A: Project Master Site Plan ............................................................................................ 8 Appendix B: Initial Meeting Checklist (Methodology Meeting) .................................................. 10 Appendix C: Trip Generation Calculations ITE 10th Edition ........................................................ 15 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1256 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) Creekside Apartments – Creekside Commerce Park – CPUD Amendment – Traffic Impact Analysis – June 2020 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e | 4 Project Description The Creekside Commerce Park Commercial Planned Unit Development (CPUD) is located in north Naples on the south side of Immokalee Road (CR 846), and straddles Goodlette-Frank Road (CR 851). The CPUD project is approximately 106 acres in size. The subject Creekside Apartments CPUD Amendment project is located in the southeast quadrant of the of Immokalee Road (CR 846) and Goodlette-Frank Road (CR 851) intersection. Refer to Figure 1 – Project Location Map, which follows and Appendix A: Project Master Site Plan. Figure 1 – Project Location Map The CPUD has allocated 233,100 sf of Medical-Dental Office Building (Medical Office) of which 119,402 sf has been developed. The 113,698 sf of remaining future Medical Office includes a previously approved SDP for a 37,503 sf Medical Office which was submitted in 2015 but never developed. The Creekside Apartments CPUD Amendment (CPUDA) project proposes to allow a 300-unit apartment complex within the Creekside Commerce Park in exchange for, from a traffic standpoint, the allowed 37,503 sf of SDP Medical Office. In addition, the balance of Medical Office use required to ensure the proposed change to the CPUD will be traffic neutral will come from the remaining future Medical Office. 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1257 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) Creekside Apartments – Creekside Commerce Park – CPUD Amendment – Traffic Impact Analysis – June 2020 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e | 5 A methodology meeting was held with the Collier County Transportation Planning staff on February 06, 2020 via email (refer to Appendix B: Initial Meeting Checklist (Methodology Meeting). The proposed development program associated with the new residential land use is shown in Table 1, Proposed Development Program. Table 1 Proposed Development Program Land Use ITE Land Use Code Total Size* Future CPUD Medical-Dental Office Building 720 113,698 sf Proposed Creekside Apartments 220 300 dwelling units Note(s): *sf = square feet. Accesses to the site are currently provided consistent with the proposed PUD Master Site Plan as shown in Appendix A. No new PUD connections and no changes to the existing approved accesses are requested as part of this rezone amendment application. Trip Generation The project provides the highest and best use scenario with respect to the project’s proposed trip generation. The project’s site trip generation is based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition, and the software program OTISS (Online Traffic Impact Study Software, most current version). The ITE rates and equations are used for the trip generation calculations, as applicable. The ITE – OTISS trip generation calculation worksheets are provided in Appendix C: Trip Generation Calculations ITE 10th Edition. The internal capture accounts for a reduction in external traffic because of the interaction between the multiple land uses in a site. Per Collier County TIS Guidelines and Procedures, the internal capture trips should be reasonable and should not exceed 20% of the total project trips. For the purposes of this analysis, internal capture traffic reductions are not considered. The pass-by trips account for traffic that is already on the external roadway network and stops at the project on the way to a primary trip destination. In accordance with Collier County and ITE guidelines, no pass-by reductions are recommended for these land uses. The estimated trip generation based on the approved CPUD conditions is shown in Table 2A. The proposed PUD amendment projected traffic generation is illustrated in Table 2B. The net new trip generation (Table 2C) shows total proposed conditions versus existing allowed (the difference between Table 2B and Table 2A). 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1258 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) Creekside Apartments – Creekside Commerce Park – CPUD Amendment – Traffic Impact Analysis – June 2020 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e | 6 Table 2A Trip Generation (Approved CPUD Conditions) – Average Weekday Development 24 Hour Two-Way Volume AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Enter Exit Total Enter Exit Total Medical Office – 45,800 square feet 1,672 87 24 111 44 113 157 Table 2B Trip Generation (Proposed CPUDA Conditions) – Average Weekday Development 24 Hour Two-Way Volume AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Enter Exit Total Enter Exit Total Apartments – 300 dwelling units 2,227 31 104 135 99 58 157 In agreement with the Collier County TIS guidelines, significantly impacted roadways are identified consistent with the peak hour of the adjacent street traffic. Based on the information contained within the 2019 Collier County Annual Update and Inventory Report (AUIR), the peak hour for adjacent roadway network is PM. Table 2C Trip Generation (New Net External Traffic) – Average Weekday Development Net External Traffic – PM Peak Hour Enter Exit Total Proposed CPUDA 99 58 157 Approved CPUD 44 113 157 Proposed CPUDA Net New Increase/(Decrease) 55 (55) 0 The Collier County concurrency analysis (roadway link analysis) is based on the estimated net new traffic – PM peak hour average weekday. As illustrated in Table 2C, the proposed development traffic produces no additional PM peak hour 2-way trips. As such, there is no net new traffic during the PM peak hour to be evaluated for concurrency analysis purposes. Conclusion Based on the results of this analysis, the proposed CPUDA does not produce any additional unadjusted, weekday PM peak hour 2-way trips when compared to the existing approved Medical Office land use. In 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1259 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) Creekside Apartments – Creekside Commerce Park – CPUD Amendment – Traffic Impact Analysis – June 2020 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e | 7 order to be traffic neutral, the CPUD will need to reallocate 45,800 sf of the future Medical Office land use building area (which includes the 37,503 sf Medical Office which was approved but never developed) to allow the 300 residential apartments to be developed. A detailed evaluation of applicable access points will be performed at the time of site development permitting/platting to determine operational requirements, as applicable. 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1260 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) Creekside Apartments – Creekside Commerce Park – CPUD Amendment – Traffic Impact Analysis – June 2020 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e | 8 Appendix A: Project Master Site Plan 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1261 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) Creekside Apartments – Creekside Commerce Park – CPUD Amendment – Traffic Impact Analysis – June 2020 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e | 9 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1262 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) Creekside Apartments – Creekside Commerce Park – CPUD Amendment – Traffic Impact Analysis – June 2020 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e | 10 Appendix B: Initial Meeting Checklist (Methodology Meeting) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1263 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) Creekside Apartments – Creekside Commerce Park – CPUD Amendment – Traffic Impact Analysis – June 2020 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e | 11 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1264 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) Creekside Apartments – Creekside Commerce Park – CPUD Amendment – Traffic Impact Analysis – June 2020 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e | 12 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1265 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) Creekside Apartments – Creekside Commerce Park – CPUD Amendment – Traffic Impact Analysis – June 2020 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e | 13 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1266 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) Creekside Apartments – Creekside Commerce Park – CPUD Amendment – Traffic Impact Analysis – June 2020 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e | 14 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1267 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) Creekside Apartments – Creekside Commerce Park – CPUD Amendment – Traffic Impact Analysis – June 2020 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e | 15 Appendix C: Trip Generation Calculations ITE 10th Edition 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1268 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) Creekside Apartments – Creekside Commerce Park – CPUD Amendment – Traffic Impact Analysis – June 2020 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e | 16 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1269 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) Creekside Apartments – Creekside Commerce Park – CPUD Amendment – Traffic Impact Analysis – June 2020 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e | 17 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1270 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) ORDINANCE NO. 18- 19 AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 2006-50, THE CREEKSIDE COMMERCE PARK COMMERCIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (CPUD), AS AMENDED, BY ADDING OUTDOOR RECREATION FACILITIES AS A GENERAL PERMITTED USE; BY PROVIDING THAT WELLNESS CENTERS ASSOCIATED WITH EMPLOYEES AND HOTEL GUESTS SHALL NOT COUNT TOWARDS SQUARE FOOTAGE MAXIMUMS IN THE BUSINESS DISTRICT AND INDUSTRIAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT; BY ALLOWING A 169 ROOM HOTEL ON TRACT 6 WEST OF GOODLETTE FRANK ROAD; BY DECREASING THE ALLOWABLE SQUARE FOOTAGE IN THE INDUSTRIAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT BY 6,900 SQUARE FEET FOR A TOTAL OF 709,100 SQUARE FEET OF FLOOR AREA OF INDUSTRIAL/COMMERCE USES; BY DECREASING THE ALLOWABLE SQUARE FOOTAGE IN THE BUSINESS DISTRICT BY 23,000 SQUARE FEET TO 269,000 SQUARE FEET INCLUDING A REDUCTION FROM 242,000 SQUARE FEET TO 219,000 SQUARE FEET OF OFFICE USES; BY ADDING INDOOR AND OUTDOOR RECREATIONAL FACILITIES AS A PERMITTED ACCESSORY USE IN THE BUSINESS DISTRICT AND INDUSTRIAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT; BY ADDING DEVIATIONS TO ALLOW ANY USE ON TRACTS 3 AND 6 ON THE MASTER PLAN TO BE ELIGIBLE FOR THE COUNTY'S ARCHITECTURAL DEVIATION PROCESS AND A DEVIATION TO PERMIT EXISTING STREET TREES TO SATISFY THE BUFFER TREE REQUIREMENT FOR TRACT 5. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED SOUTH OF IMMOKALEE ROAD AND BOTH EAST AND WEST OF GOODLETTE FRANK ROAD IN SECTION 27, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, CONSISTING OF 106 ACRES; AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. [PL20170000425] WHEREAS, on October 24, 2006, the Board of County Commissioners approved Ordinance Number 06-50, the Creekside Commerce Park Commercial Planned Unit Development (the "PUD"); and WHEREAS, on March 12, 2013, the Board of County Commissioners approved Ordinance Number 13-23, which amended the PUD; and WHEREAS, on March 22, 2016, the Board of County Commissioners approved Ordinance Number 16-05, which further amended the PUD; and 17-CPS-01705/1405779/1] 160 Creekside Commerce Park CPUD 1 of 2 PL20170000425 4/10/18 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1271 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) WHEREAS, on October 25, 2016, the Board of County Commissioners approved Ordinance Number 16-32, which further amended the PUD; and WHEREAS, Richard D. Yovanovich, Esquire of Coleman, Yovanovich & Koester, P.A., and D. Wayne Arnold of Q. Grady Minor & Associates representing Arthrex, Inc., petitioned the Board of County Commissioners to amend the CPUD. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that: SECTION ONE: Amendment to the CPUD Document of Ordinance No. 2006-50, as amended The CPUD Document attached as Exhibit "A" to Ordinance No. 2006-50, as amended, is hereby amended to read as follows: See Exhibit "A", attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. SECTION TWO: This Ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Department of State. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by super-majority vote of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this oQ L-{ day of A p r i L 2018. ATTEST.;h BOARD OF C' TY COMMI IONERS DWIGHT E. BROCK,CLERK COLLIER '4 FLO' j' By: I 40.A...A ii By: , A Attest as to airman s- i epu ' ANDY SOLIS, Chairman signature only. Apprs tied as to form ano egality: C, to H-idi As ton-Cicko This ordinance filed with the Managing Assistant County Attorney Secretary of S ote's Office the egetfIday of L_, Attachments: Exhibit A—CPUD Document and acknowledgement of that filing received this o ' day of ' i1 _ , 1 17-CPS-01705/1405779/1] 160 gy • ...AlIs :- Creekside Commerce Park CPUD 2 of 2 Ow ill if PL20170000425 4/10/18 cq 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1272 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) Exhibit A CREEKSIDE COMMERCE PARK A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PREPARED FOR BARRON COLLIER PARTNERSHIP 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1273 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) CREEKSIDE COMMERCE PARK A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT 106±Acres Located in Section 27 Township 48 South, Range 25 East Collier County, Florida PREPARED FOR: BARRON COLLIER PARTNERSHIP 2640 Golden Gate Parkway,Naples,FL 34105 PREPARED BY: WILSON, MILLER, BARTON&PEEK, INC. 3200 Bailey Lane, Suite 200,Naples, Florida 34105 YOUNG, VAN ASSENDERP&VARNADOE, P.A. 801 Laurel Oak Drive, Suite 300,Naples, Florida 34101 AMENDED DECEMBER 2005 BY: Q. GRADY MINOR AND ASSOCIATES,P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Spring,Florida 34134 ROETZEL AND ANDRESS,L.P.A. 850 Park Shore Drive, 3rd Floor,Naples, Florida 34103 AMENDED MAY 2012 BY: Q. GRADY MINOR AND ASSOCIATES, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Spring,Florida 34134 COLEMAN, YOVANOVICH AND KOESTER, P.A. Northern Trust Bank Building 4001 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 300,Naples, FL 34103 AMENDED AUGUST 2015-avid-=JULY 2016 and OCTOBER 2016 BY: Q. GRADY MINOR AND ASSOCIATES, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Spring,Florida 34134 COLEMAN, YOVANOVICH AND KOESTER, P.A. Northern Trust Bank Building 4001 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 300,Naples, FL 34103 Words stalk-through are deleted; words underlined are added. 2017 CPUD Amendment April 10, 2018 9 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1274 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE AND SHORT TITLE SECTION I LEGAL DESCRIPTION, PROPERTY OWNERSHIP, & 1-1 GENERAL DESCRIPTION SECTION II COMMERCE PARK DEVELOPMENT 2-1 2.1 Purpose 2.2 General Description Of The Park and Proposed Land Uses 2.3 Compliance With County Ordinances 2.4 Community Development District 2.5 Land Uses 2.6 Lake Siting 2.7 Fill Storage 2.8 Use Of Right-Of-Way 2.9 Sales Office and Construction Office 2.10 Changes and Amendments To PUD Document Or PUD Master Plan 2.11 Preliminary Subdivision Plat Phasing 2.12 Open Space and Native Vegetation Retention Requirements 2.13 Surface Water Management 2.14 Environmental 2.15 Utilities 2.16 Transportation 2.17 Common Area Maintenance 2.18 Design Guidelines and Standards 2.19 Landscape Buffers, Berms, Fences and Walls 2.20 Signage 2.21 General Permitted Uses SECTION III INDUSTRIAL/COMMERCE DISTRICT 3-1 SECTION IV BUSINESS DISTRICT 4-1 SECTION V PRESERVE AREA 5-1 EXHIBIT A AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH, LOCATION MAP WMB&P File No. RZ-255A) EXHIBIT B CREEKSIDE COMMERCE PARK MASTER PLAN EXHIBIT B-1 CROSS SECTIONS (ENLARGED) EXHIBIT C CONCEPTUAL BUILDING RENDERING Words elc-through are deleted; words underlined are added. 2017 CPDD Amendment i April 10, 2018 9 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1275 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE The purpose of this section is to express the intent of the Barron Collier Partnership, hereinafter referred to as Barron Collier or the Developer,to create a Planned Unit Development(PUD)on 106± acres of land located in Section 27,Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. The name of this Planned Unit Development shall be Creekside Commerce Park. The development of Creekside Commerce Park will be in substantial compliance with the planning goals and objectives of Collier County as set forth in the Growth Management Plan. The development will be consistent with the policies and land development regulations adopted thereunder of the Growth Management Plan Future Land Use Element and other applicable regulations for the following reasons: 1. The subject property is within the Urban Mixed Use District as identified on the Future Land Use Map which allows certain industrial and commercial uses. The Urban designation also allows support medical facilities,offices,clinics,treatment,research and rehabilitative centers and pharmacies provided they are located within 1/4 mile of the property boundary of an existing or approved hospital or medical center. The Creekside Commerce Park PUD is located within 'A mile of the North Collier Hospital. The 2016 petition request is to add 166,000 square feet to the IIC District and 32,000 square feet to the B District. All additional square footage approved in the October 2016 Ordinance amendment will be medical related uses, and will be on Tracts that are within or partially within ''A mile of the North Collier Hospital property. 2. The existing Industrial zoning is considered consistent with the Future Land Use Element FLUE) as provided for by Policy 5.9 and 5.11 of the FLUE. 3. The FLUE Urban-Industrial District allows for expansion of the industrial land use provided the rezone is in the form of a PUD, the site is adjacent to existing land designated or zoned industrial the land use is compatible with adjacent land uses and the necessary infrastructure is provided or in place. Creekside Commerce Park has expanded the industrial land use accordingly. 4. The FLUE Urban-Industrial District requires the uses along the boundaries of the project to be transitional. Creekside Commerce Park has included transitional uses accordingly. 5. Creekside Commerce Park is compatible with and complementary to existing and future surrounding land uses as required in Policy 5.4 of the FLUE. 6. Improvements are planned to be in substantial compliance with applicable land development regulations as set forth in Objective 3 of the FLUE. 7. The development of Creekside Commerce Park will result in an efficient and economical extension of community facilities and services as required in Policies 3.1.H and L of the FLUE. Words struck--thugh are deleted; words underlined are added. 2017 CPUD Amendment ii April 10, 2018 9 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1276 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 8. Creekside Commerce Park is a master planned, deed-restricted commerce park and is planned to encourage ingenuity, innovation and imagination as set forth in the Collier County Land Development Code (LDC), Planned Unit Development District. 9. This master planned park will incorporate elements from the existing Industrial,Business Park and Industrial PUD sections of the LDC. Words stpuelc-tlh are deleted; words underlined are added. 2017 CPUD Amendment iii April 10, 2018 9 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1277 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) SHORT TITLE This ordinance shall be known and cited as the "CREEKSIDE COMMERCE PARK PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE". Words stk--thpeugh are deleted; words underlined are added. 2017 CP UD Amendment iv April 10, 2018 9 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1278 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) SECTION I LEGAL DESCRIPTION, PROPERTY OWNERSHIP, AND GENERAL DESCRIPTION 1.1 PURPOSE The purpose of this section is to set forth the legal description and ownership of Creekside Commerce Park, and to describe the existing condition of the property proposed to be developed. 1.2 LEGAL DESCRIPTION All that part of Section 27, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida being more particularly described as follows; COMMENCING at the northwest corner of said Section 27; thence along the north line of said Section 27 South 89°45'21" East 1869.61 feet; thence leaving said line South 00°14'39" West 125.00 feet to a point on the south right of way line of Immokalee Road (S.R. 846) and the POINT OF BEGINNING of the parcel herein described; thence along said right of way line in the following Six (6)described courses; 1) South 89°45'21" East 485.99 feet; 2) South 00°14'39" West 10.00 feet; 3) South 89°45'21" East 150.19 feet; 4) South 89°48'33" East 716.81 feet; 5)North 05°34'33" West 10.05 feet; 6) South 89°48'33" East 486.21 feet to a point on the west right of way line of Goodlette Road as recorded in Plat Book 3, page 58, Public Records of Collier County, Florida; thence along said line South 05°33'48" East 1767.02 feet; thence leaving said line South 89°20'53" West 51.18 feet; thence North 23°55'53" West 13.07 feet; thence northwesterly, 30.71 feet along the arc of a circular curve concave to the northeast, having a radius of 80.00 feet,through a central angle of 21°59'52" and being subtended by a chord which bears North 12°55'57" West 30.53 feet; thence North 05°00'53" West 31.56 feet; thence North 36°19'20" West 32.02 feet; thence North 56°04'35" West 35.11 feet; thence North 80°39'15" West 32.53 feet; thence North 88°39'12" West 97.78 feet; thence North 86°04'40" West 45.79 feet; thence North 89°49'48" West 132.77 feet; thence North 69°40'10" West 37.23 feet; thence South 89°20'53" West 142.47 feet; thence South 84°59'26" West 24.66 feet; thence South 74°56'50" West 121.32 feet; thence South 79°49'59" West 45.93 feet; thence westerly and northwesterly, 45.51 feet along the arc of a circular curve concave to the northeast, having a radius of 66.00 feet, through a central angle of 39°30'16"and Words stpuelf-through are deleted; words underlined are added. 2017 CPUD Amendment 1-1 April 10, 2018 O 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1279 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) being subtended by a chord which bears North 80°24'53" West 44.61 feet to a point of compound curvature; thence northwesterly, 52.92 feet along the arc of a circular curve concave to the southwest, having a radius of 150.00 feet, through a central angle of 20°12'57" and being subtended by a chord which bears North 70°46'13" West 52.65 feet; thence North 80°52'42" West 36.59 feet; thence westerly and southwesterly, 46.18 feet along the arc of a circular curve concave to the southeast, having a radius of 80.00 feet, through a central angle of 33°04'14" and being subtended by a chord which bears South 82°35'11" West 45.54 feet to a point of compound curvature; thence southwesterly and westerly, 38.16 feet along the arc of a circular curve concave to the northwest, having a radius of 60.00 feet, through a central angle of 36°26'19"and being subtended by a chord which bears South 84°16'14" West 37.52 feet to a point of compound curvature; thence westerly and northwesterly, 68.85 feet along the arc of a circular curve concave to the southwest, having a radius of 305.00 feet,through a central angle of 12°55'59" and being subtended by a chord which bears North 83°58'36" West 68.70 feet; thence South 89°33'25" West 18.36 feet; thence South 89°39'19" West 71.63 feet; thence North 89°34'56" West 36.03 feet; thence South 86°06'41" West 42.94 feet; thence South 83°44'16" West 26.23 feet; thence South 51°01'13" West 27.49 feet; thence South 33°25'50" West 19.95 feet; thence South 15°40'05" West 20.54 feet; thence South 10°54'39" West 34.64 feet; thence South 89°20'14" West 101.06 feet; thence North 10°46'06" East 101.42 feet; thence North 89°20'53" East 65.45 feet; thence North 00°39'07" West 100.64 feet; thence South 89°20'53" West 503.78 feet; thence North 00°39'07" West 27.71 feet; thence North 72°58'55" West 131.30 feet; thence North 02°08'56" West 1473.29 feet to a point on the south right of way line of said Immokalee Road (S.R. 846) and the POINT OF BEGINNING of the parcel herein described; Containing 69.48 acres more or less; Subject to easements and restrictions of record. Bearings are assumed and based on the north line of said Section 27 being South 89°49'40" East. All that part of Section 27, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida being more particularly described as follows; Commencing at the northeast corner of said Section 27; Words struck-through are deleted; words underlined are added. 2017 CPUD Amendment 1-2 April 10, 2018 AU 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1280 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) thence along the east line of said Section 27, South 01°09'43"East 125.00 feet to a point on the south right of way line of Immokalee Road (S.R. 846) and the POINT OF BEGINNING of the parcel herein described; thence continue along said east line South 01°09'43" East 1189.62 feet; thence leaving said line South 89°48'50" West 677.35 feet; thence South 05°35'39" East 886.02 feet; thence South 89°48'50" West 400.00 feet to a point on the easterly right of way line of Goodlette Frank Road as Recorded in Plat Book 13, page 58, Public records of Collier County, Florida; thence along said line North 05°35'39" West 2088.10 feet to a point of the south right of way line of said Immokalee Road (S.R. 846); thence along said line South 89°49'40" East 1168.55 feet; thence continue along said line South 89°12'58" East 1.85 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING of the parcel herein described; Containing 38.9 acres more or less; Subject to easements and restrictions of record. Bearings are assumed and based on the north line of said Section 27 being South 89°46'26" East. LESS A PORTION OF TRACTS "R" AND "LI" CREEKSIDE COMMERCE PARK WEST-UNIT ONE AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 29 AT PAGES 57 THROUGH 58 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGIN AT THE NORTHWESTERLYMOST CORNER OF TRACT"R"(CREEKSIDE WAY) CREEKSIDE COMMERCE PARK WEST-UNIT ONE AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 29 AT PAGES 57 THROUGH 58 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE RUN SOUTH 89°45'00" EAST, ALONG THE SOUTH RIGHT-OF-WAY OF IMMOKALEE ROAD FOR A DISTANCE OF 249.45 FEET;THENCE RUN SOUTH 00°25'51" WEST FOR A DISTANCE OF 107.22 FEET; THENCE RUN SOUTH 60°02'56" EAST FOR A DISTANCE OF 117.20 FEET;THENCE RUN SOUTH 82°32'14" EAST FOR A DISTANCE OF 119.17 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EAST LINE OF TRACT "LI" OF SAID CREEKSIDE COMMERCE PARK WEST-UNIT ONE, ALSO BEING THE WES LINE OF LOT 3 OF SAID CREEKSIDE COMMERCE PARK WEST-UNIT ONE; THENCE RUN SOUTH 00°07'39" EAST,ALONG SAID EAST LINE FOR A DISTANCE OF 111.93 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY OF SAID TRACT "R"; THENCE RUN NORTH 89°58'01" WEST, ALONG SAID NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR A DISTANCE OF 456.64 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY OF SAID TRACT "R"; THENCE RUN NORTH 02°19'57" WEST, ALONG SAID WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR A DISTANCE OF 294.20 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; CONTAINING 2.32 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. Words struck through are deleted; words underlined are added. 2017 CPUD Amendment 1-3 April 10, 2018 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1281 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 1.3 PROPERTY OWNERSHIP The subject property is currently under the equitable ownership or control of Barron Collier Partnership,or its assigns,whose address is 2640 Golden Gate Parkway,Naples,FL 34105. 1.4 GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY A. The project site is located in Section 27,Township 48 South,Range 25 East, and is generally bordered on the west by Agriculturally zoned and developed property; on the north, across Immokalee Road by office and medical (North Collier Hospital) PUD zoned and developed property; on the east by Medical Office Park currently under development, County Park and County Wastewater Treatment Facility; and on the south by PUD and County Wastewater Treatment Facility. The location of the site is shown on Exhibit A Aerial Photograph, Location Map. B. The zoning classification of the subject property at the time of PUD application is I (Industrial) and A (Agricultural). C. Elevations within the site are approximately 7.5 to 9 feet-NGVD. Per FEMA Firm Map Panels No. 1200670193D, dated June 3, 1986,the Creekside Commerce Park property is located within Zones "AE-11" of the FEMA flood insurance rate. D. The soil types on the site generally include Riviera limestone substratum, Copeland fine sand, Pineda fine sand, Immokalee fine sand, Myakka fine sand, Basinger fine sand, Riveria fine sand, Ft. Drum and Malabar fine sand, and Satellite fine sand. E. Prior to development, vegetation on the site primarily consists of active croplands and small amounts of pine flatwoods. An isolated wetland system is located along the south side of Immokalee Road west of Goodlette-Frank Road. This wetland consists primarily of Brazilian pepper that surrounds a small willow area. The wetland on the east side of Goodlette-Frank Road consists primarily of cabbage palms. A portion of the historic water course within this wetland has been channelized. Brazilian pepper has infested the northern part of this wetland. F. The project site is located within the Pine Ridge Canal and West Branch Cocohatchee River sub-basins, as depicted within the Collier County Drainage Atlas (July, 1995). 1.5 DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT Creekside Commerce Park does not meet the minimum thresholds for a Development of Regional Impact (DRI), pursuant to Chapter 380.06, Florida Statutes, 2016, in that it is at or below 80% of all numerical thresholds in the guidelines and standards set forth therein. Words st-ntelf4hPough are deleted; words underlined are added. 2017 CPUD Amendment 1-4 April 10, 2018 0 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1282 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) SECTION II PROJECT DEVELOPMENT 2.1 PURPOSE The purpose of this Section is to generally describe the plan of development for Creekside Commerce Park (park), and to identify relationships to applicable County ordinances, policies, and procedures. 2.2 GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PARK AND PROPOSED LAND USES A. Creekside Commerce Park will consist of predominately industrial, warehouse, wholesale, financial institutions, business and office uses, with limited amounts of retail uses. Creekside Commerce Park shall establish project-wide guidelines and standards to ensure a high and consistent level of quality for proposed features and facilities. B. A Land Use Summary indicating approximate land use acreages is shown on the Master plan. The location, size, and configuration of individual tracts shall be determined at the time of Preliminary Subdivision Plat approval with minor adjustments at the time of Final Plat approval, in accordance with Section 3.2.7.2. of the Collier County Land Development Code (LDC). 2.3 COMPLIANCE WITH COUNTY ORDINANCES A. Regulations for development of Creekside Commerce Park shall be in accordance with the contents of this PUD Ordinance,and to the extent they are not inconsistent with this PUD Ordinance, applicable sections of the LDC and Collier County Growth Management Plan which are in effect at the time of issuance of any development order. Where this PUD Ordinance does not provide developmental standards, then the provisions of the specific section of the LDC that is otherwise applicable shall apply to which said regulations relate. B. Unless otherwise defined herein, or as necessarily implied by context, the definitions of all terms shall be the same as the definitions set forth in the LDC in effect at the time of development order application. C. Development permitted by the approval of this PUD will be subject to the Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance, Division 3.15 of the LDC. D. All conditions imposed herein or as represented on the Creekside Commerce Park Master Plan are part of the regulations which govern the manner in which the land may be developed. Words struck-through are deleted; words underlined are added. 2017 CPUD Amendment 2-1 April 10, 2018 CA 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1283 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) E. The Site Development Plans Division of the LDC (Article 3, Division 3.3) shall apply to Creekside Commerce Park, except where an exemption is set forth herein or otherwise granted pursuant to LDC Section 3.3.4. F. The Developer shall submit to the County an annual PUD monitoring report in accordance with LDC Section 2.7.3.6. 2.4 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT A. The Developer may elect to establish a Community Development District (CDD) pursuant to Chapter 190, Florida Statutes, 1997, to provide and maintain infrastructure and community facilities needed to serve the park. A CDD would constitute a timely, efficient, effective, responsive and economic way to ensure the provision of facilities and infrastructure for the proposed development. Such infrastructure as may be constructed, managed and financed by the CDD shall be subject to, and shall not be inconsistent with, the Collier County Growth Management Plan and all applicable ordinances dealing with planning and permitting of Creekside Commerce Park. B. The land area is amenable to infrastructure provision by a district that has the powers set forth in the charter of a Community Development District under Section 190.006 through 190.041,Florida Statutes. Such a district is a legitimate alternative available both to the County and to the landowner for the timely and sustained provision of quality infrastructure under the terms and conditions of County development approval. 2.5 LAND USES A. The location of land uses are shown on the PUD Master Plan, Exhibit B. Changes and variations in building tracts, location and acreage of these uses shall be permitted at preliminary subdivision plat approval, preliminary site development plan approval and final site development plan approval to accommodate utilities, topography, vegetation, and other site and market conditions, subject to the provisions of Section 2.7.3.5. of the Collier County LDC. The specific location and size of individual tracts and the assignment of square footage or units shall be determined at the time of site development plan approval. B. Roads and other infrastructure may be either public, private or a combination of public and private, depending on location, design and purpose. The request for a road to be public shall be made by the Developer at the time of final subdivision plat approval. The Developer or its assignees shall be responsible for maintaining the roads, streets, drainage, common areas, water and sewer improvements where such systems are not dedicated to the County. Standards for roads shall be in compliance with the applicable provisions of the County Code regulating subdivisions, unless otherwise approved during subdivision approval. The Words str-ftelf-threugh are deleted; words underlined are added. 2017 CPUD Amendment 2-2 April 10, 2018 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1284 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) Developer reserves the right to request substitutions to Code design standards in accordance with Section 3.2.7.2. of the LDC. 2.6 LAKE SITING A. As depicted on the PUD Master Plan, lakes have been preliminary sited. The goal of this Master Plan is to achieve an overall aesthetic character for the park,to permit optimum use of the land, and to increase the efficiency of the water management network. Fill material from lakes is planned to be utilized within the park;however, excess fill material may be utilized off-site. The volume of material to be removed shall be limited to ten percent of the calculated excavation volume to a maximum of 20,000 cubic yards. If the applicant wishes to take more off-site, a commercial excavation permit will be required. Final lake area determination shall be in accordance with the South Florida Water Management District stormwater criteria and Section 3.5.7. of the LDC. 1. Setbacks: Excavations shall be located so that the control elevation shall adhere to the following minimum setback requirements, subject to approval of County staff at time of final construction plan approval: a) Twenty feet (20') from right-of-way of internal roads. The roads will be designed to (AASHTO)road standards and shall incorporate such factors as road alignment, travel speed, bank slope, road cross sections, and need for barriers. b) Forty feet (40') from Immokalee Road or Goodlette-Frank Road rights-of-way. Perimeter property lines will have a setback of twenty feet (20'). The roads will be designed to (AASHTO) road standards and shall incorporate such factors as road alignment, travel speed, bank slope, road cross sections and need for barriers. 2.7 FILL STORAGE A. Fill storage is generally permitted as a principal use throughout the Creekside Commerce Park PUD. Fill material generated from properties owned or leased by the Developer may be transported and stockpiled within areas which have been disturbed. Prior to stockpiling in these locations, the Developer shall notify the Community Development and Environmental Services Administrator per Section 3.2.8.3.6. of the LDC. The following standards shall apply: 1. Stockpile maximum height: Thirty-five feet(35') 2. Fill storage areas in excess of five feet(5') in height shall be separated from developed areas by fencing, excavated water bodies or other physical barriers if the side slope of the stockpile is steeper than 4 to 1 (i.e. 3 to 1). Words k-threugh are deleted; words underlined are added. 2017 CPUD Amendment 2-3 April 10, 2018 0 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1285 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) a) Soil erosion control shall be provided in accordance with LDC Division 3.7. 2.8 USE OF RIGHTS-OF-WAY Utilization of lands within all park rights-of-way for landscaping, decorative entrance ways, and signage shall be allowed subject to review and administrative approval by the Developer and the Community Development and Environmental Services Administrator for engineering and safety considerations during the development review process. 2.9 SALES OFFICE AND CONSTRUCTION OFFICE Sales offices, construction offices, and other uses and structures related to the promotion and sale of real estate such as, but not limited to, pavilions, parking areas, and signs, shall be permitted principal uses throughout Creekside Commerce Park. These uses may be either wet or dry facilities. These uses shall be subject to the requirements of Section 2.6.33.4., Section 3.2.6.3.6. and Division 3.3 of the LDC, with the exception that the temporary use permit shall be valid through the life of the project with no extension of the temporary use required. These uses may use septic tanks or holding tanks for waste disposal subject to permitting under F.A.C. 10D-6 and may use potable water or irrigation wells. 2.10 CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS TO PUD DOCUMENT OR PUD MASTER PLAN A. Changes and amendments may be made to this PUD Ordinance or PUD Master Plan as provided in Section 2.7.3.5. of the LDC. Minor changes and refinements as described herein may be made by the Developer in connection with any type of development or permit application required by the LDC. B. The Community Development and Environmental Services Administrator shall be authorized to approve minor changes and refinements to the Creekside Commerce Park Master Plan upon written request of the Developer or his assignee. C. The following limitations shall apply to such requests: 1) The minor change or refinement shall be consistent with the Collier County Growth Management Plan and the Creekside Commerce Park PUD document. 2) The minor change or refinement shall not constitute a substantial change pursuant to Section 2.7.3.5.1. of the LDC. 3) The minor change or refinement shall be compatible with external adjacent land uses and shall not create detrimental impacts to abutting land uses, Words seek-through are deleted; words underlined are added. 2017 CPUD Amendment 2-4 Apri110, 2018 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1286 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) water management facilities, and conservation areas within or external to the PUD. D. The following shall be deemed minor changes or refinements: 1) Reconfiguration of lakes, ponds, canals, or other water management facilities where such changes are consistent with the criteria of the South Florida Water Management District and Collier County. 2) Internal realignment of rights-of-ways. 3) Reconfiguration of parcels per Section 5.5 of this PUD. E. Minor changes and refinements as described above shall be reviewed by appropriate Collier County staff to ensure that said changes and refinements are otherwise in compliance with all applicable County Ordinances and regulations prior to the Community Development and Environmental Services Administrator's consideration for approval. F. Approval by the Community Development and Environmental Services Administrator of a minor change or refinement may occur independently from and prior to any application for Subdivision or Site Development Plan approval, however such approval shall not constitute an authorization for development or implementation of the minor change or refinement without first obtaining all other necessary County permits and approvals. 2.11 PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION PLAT PHASING Submission, review, and approval of Preliminary Subdivision Plats for the park may be accomplished in phases to correspond with the planned development of the property. 2.12 OPEN SPACE AND NATIVE VEGETATION RETENTION REQUIREMENTS The PUD will fully comply with all sections of the LDC and meet the requirements of the Growth Management Plan relating to open space and retention of native vegetation. 2.13 SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT In accordance with the Rules of the South Florida Water Management District(SFWMD), Chapters 40E-4 and 4-E-40, this project shall be designed for a storm event of 3-day duration and 25-year return frequency. The lake originally approved as Lake L-1, Creekside Unit I Plat, shall continue to be operated and maintained in accordance with the approved plat and approved South Florida Water Management District Permit. Words lk-through are deleted; words underlined are added. 2017 CPUD Amendment 2-5 Apri110, 2018 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1287 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 2.14 ENVIRONMENTAL Vegetation shall be retained in accordance with the criteria established in the Conservation and Coastal Management Element of the GMP and Section 3.05.00 of the LDC. 2.15 UTILITIES A. All necessary easements,dedications,or other instruments shall be granted to insure the continued operation and maintenance of all service utilities in compliance with applicable regulations in effect at the time approvals are requested. B. The owner shall convey to Collier County a County Utility Easement (CUE) no less than 15 feet in width for construction of an irrigation quality(IQ)main through the PUD west of Goodlette-Frank from the North County Water Reclamation Facility to the existing IQ main on Immokalee Road. The requested CUE shall be provided in a mutually agreeable location, deemed acceptable by both the Owner and the Public Utilities Planning and Project Management Division, prior to approval of the next development order west of Goodlette-Frank Road. The CUE shall be conveyed to Collier County and the Collier County Water Sewer District at no cost to County, free and clear of all liens and encumbrances. 2.16 TRANSPORTATION A. The Developer shall provide appropriate left and/or right turn lanes on Immokalee Road and Goodlette-Frank Road at the main park entrances. Such turn lanes shall be in place prior to the issuance of any Certificates of Occupancy for a use that utilizes the perspective/associated entrance. B. There shall be a full access intersection at the park's southern entrance on Goodlette Frank Road. When justified by traffic warrants,this intersection shall be signalized, notwithstanding its proximity to Immokalee Road. C. Future access points to Immokalee and Goodlette-Frank Roads are those shown on the Creekside Commerce Park Master Plan. D. Arterial level street lighting shall be provided by the Developer at the park's main entrance in conjunction with the development of this entrance. E. Road impact fees shall be paid in accordance with the provisions of Ordinance 92- 22, F. Theas Developeramendedshall provide the appropriate easements or reserve right of way so that the southerly access road west of Goodlette Frank Road may be interconnected to the properties to the west of Creekside Commerce Park. Words ale-threugh are deleted; words underlined are added. 2017 CPUD Amendment 2-6 April 10, 2018 CA 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1288 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) G. The Developer shall provide a fair share contribution toward the capital cost of traffic signals at any project access when deemed warranted by Collier County. The signal shall be owned, operated and maintained by Collier County. H. The Developer agrees to complete construction of the segment of internal roadway that connects Goodlette-Frank Road to the I/C parcel (herein called "southern parcel")that is west of Goodlette Road and abuts Pelican Marsh prior to the first of the following to occur: 1) The issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the "southern parcel"; 2) The issuance of a certificate of occupancy on the second business parcel to be developed west of the Pine Ridge Drainage Easement; 3) Within 3 years of approval of this PUD; or 4) Within 9 months of obtaining"grant"money or other funds for construction of such infrastructure from an outside source. The I/C parcels west of the Pine Ridge Drainage Easement and immediately north of the south road shall connect for service and employee access at the time that the south road is extended to a point that they may connect. J. The Developer agrees to provide the County with an update of the Transportation Impact Statement (TIS) at the time of submittal of a Preliminary Subdivision Plat or Site Development Plan. K. The Goodlette-Frank Road southernmost access to the I/C parcel east of Goodlette- Frank Road shall be limited to a right-in/right-out access. L. The maximum trip generation allowed by the proposed uses both primary and ancillary may not exceed 2,045 (external to the PUD,per TIS dated 09/16/2016 and. 07-07-2017 as amended) PM Peak Hour,two-way trips. M. The owner, its successors,or assigns, shall construct a 5-foot wide sidewalk within the Florida Power&Light(FPL)easement, subject to approval by FPL on the west side of Creekside Street and the south side of Creekside Parkway along/within folio 29331193049 to connect to the existing sidewalk along Creekside Parkway. The construction plans for the sidewalk and the letter request to FPL shall be completed and mailed prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the proposed Arthrex Headquarters building redevelopment on Tract 5 of the Master Plan. The construction of the sidewalk shall be completed no later than one year following FPL's approval. N. Due to the removal of a portion of the Creekside Boulevard minor collector roadway and re-routing of traffic,the owner, its successors, or assigns, shall design Words strucksmuek4hrefigh are deleted; words underlined are added. 2017 CPUD Amendment 2-7 April 10, 2018 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1289 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) and construct the re-routed roadway to adequately accommodate AASHTO Interstate Semitrailer (WB-62) standards and provide access to existing postal service truck traffic prior to the removal of a portion of Creekside Boulevard. The design and construction shall be at no cost to Collier County. Any additional right- of-way easements required by County for a public road pursuant to County standards shall be dedicated to the County, free and clear of all liens and encumbrances without County maintenance responsibility. Such dedication shall occur prior to the issuance of the Certification of Occupancy for the proposed Arthrex Headquarters building redevelopment on Tract 5 of the Master Plan and prior to the removal of a portion of Creekside Boulevard. The owner, its successor, or assigns, shall also accept ownership of the entire length of Creekside Boulevard with all maintenance responsibilities. 2.17 COMMON AREA MAINTENANCE Most common area maintenance will be provided by the CDD or by a Property Owner's Association (POA). The CDD or the POA, as applicable, shall be responsible for the operation,maintenance,and management of the surface water and stormwater management systems and reserves serving Creekside Commerce Park,in accordance with any applicable permits from the South Florida Water Management District. 2.18 DESIGN GUIDELINES AND STANDARDS A. The Collier County Planned Unit Development District is intended to encourage ingenuity, innovation and imagination in the planning, design and development or redevelopment of relatively large tracts of land under unified ownership as set forth in the LDC, Section 2.2.20. B. Creekside Commerce Park is planned as a functionally interrelated business park under unified control. The Developer will establish community-wide guidelines and standards to ensure a high level of quality for both the common areas and the individual parcel developments. C. These guidelines will serve as a control for individual parcel development, and be referred to as The Declaration of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions for Creekside Commerce Park. The level of quality defined in this document is directed towards the creation of an attractive business environment, and these standards are the basis for evaluation of projects submitted for review to the Property Association's Architectural and Landscaping Committee, referred to as the ALC. The standards in this document will include criteria for site planning, architectural design, lighting, landscaping, and graphics and signage. D. The specific design guidelines will act as supplemental standards to the requirements of this Planned Unit Development Ordinance, and other County codes, but in no way supersede them. Words sttuek-through are deleted; words underlined are added. 2017 CPUD Amendment 2-8 April10, 2018 CA 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1290 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 1. Common Areas The master design of the park's entries and signage, streetscapes, and open space areas will form a harmonious framework that visually links the entire park together. This unified appearance will enhance the image of the entire community. Internal roadways will provide efficient vehicular circulation with streetscapes that create pleasant neighborhood environments. Streetscape plans will be designed to establish a hierarchy of landscape improvements appropriate in scale and character with the function of the street and adjacent land uses. Along these streetscapes a pedestrian walkway system will be established to link each project with the overall community. 2. Individual Projects A. Site Planning: Each individual parcel project will provide a visually appealing, articulated, identifiable path of entry for pedestrians and vehicles from the street to the site and from the site to the buildings themselves. The orientation of a building or structure upon a site will not only reflect the project's functional need, but will also be responsive to the individual parcel's characteristics and be sensitive to adjacent land uses and the surrounding community. B. Architectural standards: The objective of the architectural standards will be to promote the creation of an attractive, value-apparent business environment. Design elements throughout a project must be consistent with the nature of the chosen style and building materials selected. Project design should endeavor to adhere to the classical principles of design and avoid clichés, overly complex or garish motifs,while seeking to invoke a"timeless" quality. C. Lighting: The guidelines for lighting will establish a continuity of design for all lighting in the park which is consistent with the overall visual impression of the park. D. Landscaping: The purpose of landscape design guidelines within individual projects is to guide development toward harmonious and visually pleasing landscape that is cohesive with the overall master landscape plan. The Creekside landscape concept will have a naturalistic theme. Similar to the overall project's plant palette, individual sites will be dominated with plants that are native,xeric,or naturalized within Southwest Florida. Landscape designs will create a coherent theme which emphasizes plant material as a primary unifying element. 1. Landscape elements along public R.O.W.s will be complimentary to streetscape landscaping. Parcel entries will be Words struel thr-e-ugh are deleted; words underlined are added. 2017 CPUD Amendment 2-9 April 10, 2018 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1291 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) designed to harmonize with adjacent streetscape landscaping, and clearly accentuate, the parcel entry. 2. Individual parking lots will be screened from the roadways as much as possible, without obscuring views of the building entrances. In addition, plant materials used around main entrances of buildings will visually cue visitors to their location. E. Graphics/signage: The guidelines serve to provide continuity of design for all signage in the park which is consistent with the overall visual impression of the park. Parcel signage serves the identification needs of the individual tenants and user. 2.19 LANDSCAPE BUFFERS, BERMS, FENCES AND WALLS Landscape buffers, berms, fences and walls are generally permitted as a principal use throughout Creekside Commerce Park. Required buffer treatments shall terminate at entrances to accommodate entrance treatments and at lakes to accommodate views into the park. The following standards shall apply: A. Landscape buffers contiguous to Immokalee Road R.O.W. will be installed at the time of subdivision improvement per construction phase and will have the following characteristics: 1) Minimum width of 20'-0", measured from the R.O.W. 2) Adjacent to Business District type uses within the Business District, trees will be native, xeric, or naturalized canopy trees, spaced at 25' on center (O.C.), planted at an initial height of 13'-14' overall (O.A.) with a 6' spread. In addition, a continuous 24" high shrub hedge shall be provided within the 20' buffer. B. Landscape buffers contiguous to Goodlette-Frank Road R.O.W.will be installed at the time of subdivision improvement per development phase and will have the following characteristics: 1) Minimum width of 20'-0", measured from the R.O.W. 2) Adjacent to Business District type uses within the Business and Industrial/Commerce (I/C) Districts, trees will be native, xeric, or naturalized canopy trees, spaced at 25' O.C., planted at an initial height of 12' O.A., with a 6' spread. At the time of individual lot improvements,hedges will be placed at parking lot edges to satisfy the requirements of LDC Section 2.4.7.4. 3) Adjacent to industrial type uses within the Industrial/Commerce District, trees will be native, xeric or naturalized canopy trees, spaced at 25' O.C., planted at Words smueel eugh are deleted; words underlined are added. 2017 CPUD Amendment 2-10 April 10, 2018 S 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1292 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) an initial height of 12' O.A, with a 6' spread. Trees will be placed on a berm, 3 feet high and supplemented with a 5 foot high hedge consisting of but not limited to the following plant material: coco plum, viburnam, ficus. The intent will be to obtain 80% opacity within one year of planting for travelers on Goodlette-Frank Road. C. Landscape buffers surrounding the perimeter of the park will be installed at the time of subdivision improvement per construction phase. The buffers are referenced on Exhibit B, and proceed in a clockwise direction from the northeast corner of the project as follows: 1) The landscape buffer along the eastern most property boundary, north of the preserve area,as depicted on Exhibit B, shall consist of an Alternative"A"type buffer. Any preservation areas within this buffer may be credited toward buffering requirements. 2) The preserve area along the balance of the eastern most property boundary will serve as the buffer between uses. 3) The Developer will provide a five feet (5') wide Alternative "A" type buffer with trees planted fifty feet (50') on center between the business use and the preserve/lake area, as depicted on Exhibit B. 4) The Developer will provide a five feet(5')wide Alternative"A"type landscape buffer with trees planted fifty feet (50') on center along the eastern property boundary contiguous to the Collier County Sewage Treatment Plant. 5) The landscape buffer along the southern most property boundary, east of Goodlette-Frank Road, shall be a five feet(5')wide Alternative"A"type buffer with trees planted fifty feet(50') on center. An opaque hedge six feet(6') high will be planted to supplement the existing oak tree buffer planted by the County at the Collier County Sewage Treatment Plant. 6) The existing landscape berm/buffer from Goodlette Frank Road to the west side of the Pine Ridge Drainage Easement will be supplemented as follows: a type A" buffer along the proposed lake; and the remaining area westward of the lake will be supplemented to consist of 50 sabal palms, 8'-14' O.A. and 4 Ficus nitida 12'-13' O.A. and 6'-8' wide; locations to be coordinated with the adjacent property owner. 7) The Developer will provide a ninety percent (90%) opaque landscape buffer and berm between the I/C District and the Pelican Marsh PUD from the west side of the Pine Ridge Drainage Easement to the existing berm to the west,that approximates the existing Pelican Marsh berm/buffer. This buffer will be installed concurrent with any I/C construction west of the Pine Ridge Drainage Words struelf-through are deleted; words underlined are added. 2017 CPDD Amendment 2-11 April 10, 2018 CA 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1293 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) Easement. The buffer shall meet ninety percent (90%) opacity within one (1) year of planting. 8) The Developer will supplement with additional trees the buffer along the remaining portion of the southern property line westward to achieve a ninety percent(90%) opaque buffer. This buffer will be installed concurrent with any I/C construction west of the Pine Ridge Drainage Easement. 9) The landscape buffer between the I/C District and the adjacent Agricultural District along the southern portion of the western property line will be an Alternative "A"type buffer. 10)The landscape buffer between the R.O.W.and the adjacent Agricultural District to the west will be an Alternative "A" type buffer and be incorporated into the R.O.W. D. Maximum fence or wall height internal to the PUD: Twelve feet(12'). E. Landscape buffers,berms,fences and walls will be constructed along the perimeter of the Creekside Commerce Park PUD boundary concurrent with subdivision and site development construction phase, except where noted in this document. F. Sidewalks, water management systems, drainage structures, and utilities may be allowed in landscape buffers pursuant to review and approval of the Development Services Administrator. G. Landscape berms located within the Creekside Commerce Park PUD boundary and contiguous to a property line and/or right-of-way line may be constructed such that the toe of slope is located on the property line and/or encroaches into the right-of- way line when approved by the applicable owner or agency. 2.20 SIGNAGE A. GENERAL 1) Pursuant to Section 2.5.5.2.3.7. of the LDC, the following conditions provide for the required comprehensive sign plan for the Creekside Commerce Park 2) Each platted parcel shall be considered a separate parcel of land. 3) Signs and decorative landscaped entrance features within a County dedicated right-of-way, shall require a right-of way permit subject to the review and approval of the County. 4) All signs shall be located so as not to cause sight line obstructions. Words struck-thre.ugh are deleted; words underlined are added. 2017 CPUD Amendment 2-12 April 10, 2018 CA 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1294 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) B. PARK ENTRY SIGNS 1) Major park entry signs shall be located as depicted on Exhibit B. Each sign will not exceed 160 square feet in size on any side and signs will be no longer than 25 feet in length and 8 feet in height. 2) Minor park entry signs shall be located as depicted Exhibit B. Each minor monument sign will not exceed 100 square feet in size on any side. Minor monument signs will be no larger than 20 feet in length and 8 feet in height. C. INTERNAL SIGNS 1) Directional or identification signs are allowed within the business park. Such signs may be used to identify the location or direction of approved uses such as sales centers, information centers, etc. Individual signs may be a maximum of 4 square feet per side in size, or signs maintaining a common architectural theme may be combined to form a menu board with a maximum size of 25 square feet per side, and a maximum height of 8 feet. No building permit is required unless such signs are combined to form a menu board. 2) Grand Opening signs: The Developer or parcel owner may display an on-site grand opening sign not exceeding 32 square feet on a side, and not exceeding 64 square feet total. Banner signs shall be anchored and may be displayed on- site for a period not exceeding 14 days within the first three months that the Developer/occupant is open for business. D. USER SIGNS 1) Wall, mansard, canopy or awning signs: One wall,mansard,canopy or awning sign may be permitted for each single-occupancy facility, or for each establishment in a multiple-occupancy facility. Corner units within multiple- occupancy facilities, or multi-frontage single-occupancy facilities shall be allowed two signs, but such signs shall not be combined for the purpose of placing the combined area on one wall. However, the combined area of those signs shall not exceed the maximum allowable display area for signs by this ordinance. a. The maximum allowable display area for signs may not be more than 15 percent of the total square footage of the visual facade of the building to which the sign will be attached and may not, in any case, exceed 200 square feet in area for any sign. 2) Monument and Pole signs: One (1) monument or pole sign is permitted for each lot or parcel for each external and internal road frontage(s). Words stPuelFtletrough are deleted; words underlined are added. 2017 CPUD Amendment 2-13 Apri110, 2018 CA 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1295 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) a. Internal road frontage setbacks: A minimum of fifteen feet (15') from the edge of pavement. Signs may encroach within the right-of-way subject to maintaining safe site distance triangles as per Section 2.4.4.16. of the LDC and when approved by the Community Development and Environmental Services Administrator and applicable utility. b. External road frontage setbacks: Pole signs shall be setback from any external right-of-way in accordance with the applicable section of the LDC. Monument signs may be permitted closer to the right-of-way subject to maintaining safe site distance triangles as per Section 2.4.4.16. of the LDC and when approved by the Community Development and Environmental Services Administrator and applicable utility. c. Spot or floodlights may be permitted provided said light shines only on the signs or landscaping and is shielded from motorists and adjacent residents. d. Should the U.S. Postal Service purchase or lease land within Creekside Commerce Park, in addition to the user signs as permitted herein, they will be allowed one sign between Immokalee Road and the proposed lake adjacent to the west entry. E. TRAFFIC SIGNS Traffic signs such as street name signs, stop signs, speed limit signs, etc. may be designed to reflect a common architectural theme, in accordance with Section 3.2.8.3.19. of the LDC. 2. 21 GENERAL PERMITTED USES A. Certain uses shall be considered general permitted uses throughout the Creekside Commerce Park PUD except in the Preserve Area. General permitted uses are those uses which generally serve the Developer and tenants of Creekside Commerce Park and are typically part of the common infrastructure. B. General Permitted Uses: 1. Essential services as set forth under LDC, Section 2.6.9.1. 2. Water management facilities and related structures. 3. Temporary sewage treatment facilities. 4. Lakes including lakes with bulkheads or other architectural or structural bank treatments. 5. Guardhouses, gatehouses, and access control structures. Words stpuek-through are deleted; words underlined are added. 2017 CPUD Amendment 2-14 April 10, 2018 1 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1296 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 6. Temporary construction,sales,and administrative offices for the Developer and Developer's authorized contractors and consultants, including necessary access ways,parking areas and related uses. 7. Landscape features including, but not limited to, landscape buffers, berms, fences and walls subject to the standards set forth in Section 2.11 of this PUD. 8. Fill storage subject to the standards set forth in Section 2.7 of this PUD. Site filling and grading as set forth in Section 2.7 of this PUD. 9. Outdoor recreation facilities, including but not limited to playfields and fitness trails on areas not designated IC or B on the PUD Master Plan. Stadiums shall be prohibited. 4,10. Any other use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing uses and which the Community Development and Environmental Services Administrator determines to be compatible. 4.4) l 1. Sidewalks may occur within County required buffers if approved by the Community Development and Environmental Services Administrator. 1-12. Standards for parking, landscaping, signs and other land uses where such standards are not specified herein are to be in accordance with the LDC provision in effect at the time of Site Development Plan Approval. 2. 22 MISCELLANEOUS A. Issuance of a development permit by a county does not in any way create any rights on the part of the applicant to obtain a permit from a state or federal agency and does not create any liability on the part of the county for issuance of the permit if the applicant fails to obtain requisite approvals or fulfill the obligations imposed by a state or federal agency or undertakes actions that result in a violation of state or federal law. B. All other applicable state or federal permits must be obtained before commencement of the development. Words struck-through are deleted; words underlined are added. 2017 CPUD Amendment 2-15 April 10, 2018 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1297 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) SECTION III INDUSTRIAL/COMMERCE DISTRICT 3.1 PURPOSE The purpose of this Section is to identify permitted uses and development standards for areas within Creekside Commerce Park designated on the Master Plan as "I/C". 3.2 GENERAL DESCRIPTION Areas designated as "UC" on the PUD Master Plan are intended to provide a maximum of 716.000709.100 square feet of gross loor aArea of industrial/commerce uses on 49.90± net acres. Intermediate care (SIC Code 8052), parking garages, and group housing and hotel/motel uses (SIC Code 7011) are in addition to the IC gross square footage figures. Wellness Centers limited to employees and hotel guests within the PUD shall not exceed a maximum of 40.000 s.f.. and shall not be counted towards overall square footage. There shall be no offsite memberships. The above referenced wellness center shall be located west of Goodlette-Frank Road. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the United States Postal Service parcel may use any available square footage in the I/C District(excluding the 166,000 square feet added by the October 2016 amendment) and the Business District up to a FAR of .35 on the United States Postal Service Parcel until all available square footages are used up in the PUD. 3.3 PERMITTED USES AND STRUCTURES No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or part, for other than the following: A. The permitted principal uses and structures will generally consist of light manufacturing, wholesale, warehouse, processing and packaging, laboratories and clinics, research, design and product development, business services and corporate offices and headquarters. 1. Aircraft Parts and Auxiliary Equipment(Group 3728) 2. Apparel and Other Finished Products (Groups 2311-2399) 3. Building Contractors (Groups 1521-1542), except for general contractors for mobile home repair on site, modular housing and premanufactured housing assembled on site, dry cleaning plant construction, paper pulp mill construction, and truck and automobile assembly plant construction. 4. Business Services(Groups 7311-7313,7319,7322,7323,7331-7338,7352, 7359-7389 except for industrial truck rental and leasing; plants, live: rental Words struek-through are deleted; words underlined are added. 2017 CPUD Amendment 3-1 April 10, 2018 CA 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1298 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) and leasing; toilets, portable: rental and leasing; employment agencies, except theatrical and motion picture; labor contractors (employment agencies)model registries; labor pools;manpower pools;modeling service; dogs, rental of: for protective service; automobile recovery service; automobile repossession service; bartering services for businesses; bondspersons; bottle exchanges; check validation service; contractors disbursement control; filling pressure containers (aerosol) with hair spray, insecticides, etc.; fire extinguishers, service of gas systems, contract conversion from manufactured to natural gas;metal slitting and shearing on a contract or fee basis produce weighing service, not connected with transportation; scrap steel cutting on a contract or fee basis; solvents recovery service on a contract or fee basis; tobacco sheeting service on a contract or fee basis) 5. Child Day Care Services (Group 8351) 6. Communications (Groups 4812-4899 not including major communications towers related to cellular phone service, radio broadcasting, television broadcasting, radar or telephone service) 7. Computer and Office Equipment(Groups 3571-3579) 8. Construction; Special Trade Contractors (Groups 1711-1799 except for boiler erection and installation contractors; drainage system installations, cesspool and septic tank contractors; fuel oil burner installation and servicing contractors; gasoline hookup contractors; sewer hookups and connection for buildings contractors; epoxy application contractors; fireproofing buildings contractors; gasoline pump installation contractors; lead burning contractors; and mobile home site setup and tie down contractors) 9. Depository and Non-Depository Institutions (Groups 6011-6163) 10. Drugs and Medicines (Groups 2833-2836, except for adrenal derivatives: bulk,uncompounded;barbituric acid and derivatives:bulk,uncompounded; cocaine and derivatives; codeine and derivatives; gland derivatives: bulk, uncompounded;mercury chlorides,U.S.P;mercury compounds,medicinal: organic and inorganic; morphine and derivatives; opium derivatives) 11. Educational Services (Groups 8249-8299 except construction equipment operation schools; truck driving schools; automobile driving instruction; survival schools; vocational counseling) 12. Electronics and Other Electrical Equipment Manufacturing (Groups 3612, 3613, 3624, 3625, 3631, 3641-3676, 3678, 3679, 3694, 3695, 3699, except for airport lighting transformers, autotransformers, electric (power Words s f-through are deleted; words underlined are added. 2017 CPDD Amendment 3-2 April 10, 2018 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1299 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) transformers) distribution transformers, electric; electric furnace transformers; lighting transformers,street and airport;transformers,reactor; atom smashers(particle accelerators; electron beam metal cutting, forming, and welding machines; electron linear accelerators; electrostatic particle accelerators)) 13. Engineering, Accounting, Research, Management and Related Services Groups 8711-8748 except chemical laboratories, commercial research; automobile proving and testing grounds; metallurgical testing laboratories; pollution testing, except automotive emissions testing; radiation dosimetry laboratories; seed testing laboratories; veterinary testing laboratories) 14. Fabricated Metal Products (Groups 3411-3432, 3442, 3444, 3446, 3452, 3469, 3492, 3495, 3496, production of metal is prohibited) 15. Furniture and Fixtures Manufacturing (Groups 2511-2599) 16. Government Offices/Buildings (Groups 9111-9199, 9221, 9222, 9224- 9229, 9311, 9451, 9511-9532, 9611, 9631-9661) 17. Hotels/ Motels (Group 7011), not to exceed a maximum of 180 349 rooms for the entire PUD. Only-1-2 Hotels/Motels is-are permitted within the PUD, atm Only one hotel/motel it mustmay be located east of Goodlette-Frank Road, and shall not exceed 180 rooms, and only one hotel/motel may be located west of Goodlette Frank Road. The hotel/motel west of Goodlette I Road shall be located on Tract 6. not to exceed 169 rooms. is subject to specific development standards and setbacks in Section 3.4. 18. Industrial and Commercial Machinery (Groups 3524, 3546, 3553-3556, 3559, 3562, 3564-3566, 3581-3599 except for bronzing and dusting machines for printing trades; foundry type for printing; presses, printing - slugs printers'; ammunition and explosives loading machinery; brick making machines; cement making machinery; chemical kilns; control rod drive mechanisms for use on nuclear reactors; foundry machinery and equipment;frame straighteners,automotive(garage equipment);fur sewing machines; ginning machines, cotton; metal finishing equipment for plating, except rolling mill lines; metal pickling equipment, except rolling mill lines) 19. Leather and Leather Products (Groups 3131-3199) 20. Measuring,Analyzing,and Controlling Instruments;Photographic,Medical and Optical Goods: Watches and Clocks Manufacturing (Groups 3812- 3843, 3845-3873) 21. Membership Organizations (Groups 8611-8631) Words struck tgh are deleted; words underlined are added. 2017 CPUD Amendment 3-3 April 10, 2018 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1300 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 22. Miscellaneous Manufacturing Industries (Groups 3911-3999 except for dressing of furs: bleaching, blending, curring, scraping, and tanning; feathers: curling, dyeing, and renovating - for the trade; fur stripping; furs dressed: bleached, curried, scraped, tanned, and dyed; pelts: scraping, curring, tanning, bleaching and dyeing; plumes, feather; tear gas devices and equipment; veils made of hair) 23. Motion Picture Production (Groups 7812-7819) 24. Motor Freight Transportation (Groups 4214, 4215) 25. Packing and Crating(Group 4783) 26. Paper and Allied Products (Groups 2652-2657, 2673-2679) 27. Personal Services (Groups 7213, 7216, 7219, 7221) 28. Physical Fitness Facilities (Group 7991) 29. Plastic Materials and Synthetics (Groups 2833,2834) 30. Printing, Publishing and Allied Industries (Groups 2711-2791) 31. Professional Offices: including but not limited to, Travel Agencies (Group 4724); Insurance Agencies(Group 6411);Insurance Carriers(Groups 6311- 6399); Real Estate (Groups 6512, 6514, 6517, 6519, 6531, 6541, 6552,) 32. Rubber and Miscellaneous Plastic Products (Groups 3021, 3085, 3086, 3088, 3089) 33. Transportation Equipment (Group 3732, except for boats, fiberglass: building and repairing; boats: motorboats, sailboats, rowboats, and canoes building and repairing; houseboats, building and repairing; motorboats, inboard and outboard: building and repairing) 34. United States Postal Service (Group 4311) 35. Warehousing and Storage (Group 4225, 4226, 5014 except oil and gas storage,petroleum and chemical bulk stations and automobile dead storage) only one (1) self-storage use allowed to be located adjacent to the Collier County Sewage Treatment Plant. 36. Wholesale Trade-Durable Goods (Groups 5021-5031, 5043-5049, 5063- 5074, 5078, 5091, 5092, 5094-5099 except for fencing, wood-wholesale; lumber: rough, dressed, and finished-wholesale; batteries, except automotive-wholesale; storage batteries, industrial-wholesale; unit substations-wholesale; boilers, power: industrial-wholesale; boilers, steam and hot water heating-wholesale; burners, fuel oil and distillate oil- wholesale; oil burners-wholesale) Words struck through are deleted; words underlined are added. 2017 CPUD Amendment 3-4 April 10, 2018 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1301 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 37. Wholesale Trade-Nondurable Goods (Groups 5111-5143, 5145, 5147- 5149, 5192, 5199 except for cats-wholesale; charcoal-wholesale; dogs- wholesale; fish, tropical-wholesale; furs, dressed-wholesale; greases, animal and vegetable-wholesale; ice, manufactured or natural-wholesale, leather and cut stock-wholesale; linseed oil-wholesale;oils,except cooking: animal and vegetable-wholesale; oilseed cake and meal-wholesale; rubber, crude-wholesale; sawdust-wholesale; vegetable cake and meal-wholesale; wigs-wholesale; worms-wholesale) 38. Any other use or service which is comparable in nature with the foregoing uses and is otherwise clearly consistent with the intent and purpose statement of the District and which the Community Development and Environmental Services Administrator determines to be compatible in this District. B. Restricted Principal Uses The following medical related uses must be located within a 1/4 mile radius of the hospital property boundary. 1. Group housing for the elderly limited to Assisted living facilities, independent living units, skilled nursing units and continuing care retirement communities. A maximum of 400 aggregate beds shall be permitted for the uses listed in Sections 3.3.B.1, 3.3.B.2, 4.3.B.1 and 4.3.8.3. These uses are limited to parcels located east of Goodlette-Frank Road. 2. Health Services, medical clinics and offices (Groups 8011-8049, 8052), a maximum of 400 aggregate beds shall be permitted for the uses listed in Sections 3.3.B.1, 3.3.B.2, 4.3.B.1 and 4.3.B.3. SIC Code 8052 land uses are limited to parcels located east of Goodlette-Frank Road. 3. Medical Laboratories and research and Rehabilitative Centers (Groups 8071-8092, 8099) 4. Any other use or service which is comparable in nature with the foregoing uses and is otherwise clearly consistent with the intent and purpose statement of the District and which the Community Development and Environmental Services Administrator determines to be compatible in this District. C. Permitted Accessory Uses and Structures: 1. Uses and structures that are accessory and incidental to uses permitted in this district, including indoor and outdoor recreational facilities. including but not limited to physical fitness facilities, piayfields and fitness trails. Stadiums shall be prohibited. Words k h are deleted; words underlined are added. 2017 CPUD Amendment 3-5 April 10, 2018 CA 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1302 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 2. Retail and wholesale sales and/or display areas as accessory to the principal use,not to exceed an area greater than forty percent(40%)of the gross floor area of the permitted principal use. D. Operational Requirements for Group Housing Group housing uses described in Section 3.2.B.1 shall provide the following services and/or be subject to the following operational standards: 1. The facility shall be for residents 55 years of age and older. 2. There shall be on-site dining for the residents. 3. Group transportation services shall be provided for residents for the purposes of grocery and other types of shopping. Individual transportation services may be provided for the residents' individualized needs including but not limited to medical office visits. 4. There shall be an on-site manager/activities coordinator to assist residents with their individual needs. The manager/coordinator shall also be responsible for arranging trips to off-site events as well as planning for lectures, movies, music and other entertainment for the residents at the on-site clubhouse. 5. A wellness center shall be provided on-site. Exercise and other fitness programs shall be provided for the residents. 6. Each unit shall be equipped to notify emergency service providers in the event of medical or other emergency. 7. Each unit shall be designed to accommodate residents with physical impairments(handicaps)as required by the applicable building codes and federal law and regulation. 3.4 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS A. Minimum Lot Area: 20,000 S.F. B. Minimum Lot Width: 100 FT. C. Minimum Yard Requirements: 1. Front Yard, adjacent to Immokalee Road or Goodlette-Frank Road: Fifty feet(50'). For parcels located east of Goodlette-Frank Road, see additional setback requirements in Section 3.4.C.7.a. Words lk-tib are deleted; words underlined are added. 2017 CPUD Amendment 3-6 April 10, 2018 CA 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1303 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 2. Front Yard, Internal: Thirty feet (30') 3. Side Yard: Ten feet(10') Five feet(5')to internal property line along Pine Ridge canal drainage easement and FP&L easement 4. Waterfront: Zero feet (0') to bulkhead or rip-rap at top of bank, otherwise twenty feet(20') 5. Rear Yard: Twenty-five feet(25') 6. Minimum Building Setback from Perimeter Boundary of PUD: Fifty feet 50') 7. Minimum Building Setback from Existing Goodlette-Frank Road Right-of- Way East of Goodlette-Frank Road: a) Goodlette-Frank Road: Minimum of fifty feet (50'), except as provided as follows: i)For group housing for elderly and intermediate care use: a) If the zoned height of any structure exceeds 50 feet, the minimum setback is 75 feet plus for any portion of a building exceeding fifty feet in zoned height an increased setback at a 1:2 ratio (i.e., for one vertical foot of height, setback is increased by two horizontal feet) for that portion of the building over 50 feet of height. ii) For hotel/motel use: a) Minimum setback of 75 feet regardless of height plus for any portion of a building exceeding fifty feet in zoned height an increased setback at a 1:2 ratio (i.e., for one vertical foot of height, setback is increased by two horizontal feet) for that portion of the building over 50 feet of height. D. Maximum Height (Zoned): For parcels west of Goodlette-Frank Road: fifty feet 50'), including silos, storage tanks, elevator towers, satellite dishes, antennas, etc. Facilities located on Tract 5 on the Master Plan shall have a maximum zoned height of one-hundred four (104') feet and a maximum actual height of one-hundred twenty two(122')feet, For parcels east of Goodlette-Frank Road: the Hotel,group housing for the elderly, and the intermediate care facility shall have a zoned height Words struelf-threfigh are deleted; words underlined are added. 2017 CPUD Amendment 3-7 April 10, 2018 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1304 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) seventy-five feet(75'), actual height eight-five feet(85'). All other uses permitted east of Goodlette-Frank Road pursuant to Section III shall have a zoned height of fifty feet(50') and an actual height of sixty feet(60'). E. Outside storage or display shall be permitted and shall be screened from all internal and external public roadways with a fence or landscaping equivalent or combination thereof. Said fence, wall or landscaped screen shall be opaque in design. All manufacturing operations and equipment, including accessory process equipment such as compressors and air handlers shall be contained in an enclosed structure. F. All I/C buildings shall meet the requirements of Section 5.05.08 of the LDC,except for buildings located on Tract 5. and 6 on the Master Plan, which shall be subject to the deviation process in Section 5.05.08 of the LDC (see Section 3.5.2, Development Deviations, of this PUD Ordinance). The building located on Tract 5 shall be similar in architectural style to the conceptual building rendering in Exhibit C. G. Business District type uses located within the I/C District along Goodlette-Frank Road will meet the Collier County Architectural Guidelines in Division 2.8. of the LDC. H. Industrial type uses abutting Goodlette-Frank Road shall meet the requirements of Section 2.19.B.3 hereof, alternatively, said uses shall have the option of utilizing the landscaped buffer applicable to business uses fronting Goodlette-Frank Road, provided the portion of the building facing Goodlette-Frank Road meets the following Architectural Guideline Sections of the LDC, therefore satisfying the intent of the building design section of the Architectural Guidelines in the opinion of the Community Development and Environmental Services Administrator: 1. Section 2.8.3.5.1., Purpose and Intent 2. Section 2.8.3.5.4., Facade Standard 3. Section 2.8.3.5.6., Project Standards 4. Section 2.8.3.5.7., Detail Features except for 2.8.3.5.7.2. 5. Section 2.8.3.5.12. Loading Areas: Buildings west of the Pine Ridge canal and adjacent to the Pelican Marsh boundary shall orient loading docks to the north, east or west. J. Noise: Uses within the I/C District shall not exceed 65 dBA between the hours of 7 a.m. and 10 p.m. Monday through Saturday, and 60 dBA after 10 p.m. to 6:59 a.m. and all of Sundays, as measured at the property boundary of the land use from which the sound emanates. Words lf- gh are deleted; words underlined are added. 2017 CPUD Amendment 3-8 April 10, 2018 CA- 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1305 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) K. Odor: No business shall cause or allow the emission of odorous air from any single source such as to result in odors which are detectable outside the parcel boundaries. Best practical treatment, maintenance, and control currently available shall be utilized in order to maintain the lowest possible emission of odorous air. L. Lighting: Lighting shall be located so that no light is aimed directly toward a property designated residential if lighting is located within 200 feet of residential property. Light fixtures within parking areas shall not exceed 25 feet in height. M. Emissions: All sources of air emissions shall comply with rules set forth by the Environmental Protection Agency (Code of Federal Regulations, Title 40) and the Florida Department of Environmental Regulation (Florida Administrative Code, Chapter 17-2). No person shall operate a regulated source of air emissions without a valid operation permit issued by the Department of Environmental Regulation. 3.5 DEVELOPMENT DEVIATIONS 1. Deviation from LDC Section 5.05.04 D.1 which establishes a .45 floor area ratio FAR) for group housing uses, to permit an FAR of .6 for group housing uses, including the intermediate care facilities. 2. Deviation from LDC Section 5.05.08, Deviations and alternate compliance, which authorizes the County Manager or designee to administratively approve deviations from compliance with Section 5.05.08 of the LDC for specific types of buildings, to allow general office and medical office, hotel and physical fitness facilities that can be constructed on Tract 5 and 6 of the Master Plan to be eligible for this deviation process. 3. Deviation from LDC Section 4.06.02.C.4., Type D Buffer, which requires a 10' wide Type D buffer adjacent to rights of way. with trees spaced no more than 30' on center.to permit the existing street trees planted along the west side of Creekside Street to satisfy the minimum Type D buffer tree requirement of the eastern boundary of Tract 5. 3.6 LANDSCAPE BUFFER RESTRICTIONS The use of bald cypress trees to meet the landscape buffer requirements in section 2.19.B.2. and B.3) are prohibited Words struek—threugh are deleted; words underlined are added. 2017 CPUD Amendment 3-9 April 10, 2018 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1306 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) SECTION IV BUSINESS DISTRICT 4.1 PURPOSE The purpose of this section is to identify permitted uses and development standards for areas within Creekside Commerce Park designated on the Master Plan as "B". 4.2 GENERAL DESCRIPTION Areas designated as "B" on the PUD Master Plan are intended to provide a maximum of 292.000269.00( square feet of #Floor aArea, including approximately 212,000219.000 square feet of office uses and 50,000 square feet of retail uses on 22.90± net acres. Intermediate care facilities (SIC Code 8052), parking garages, and group housing and hotel/motel uses (SIC Code 7011) are in addition to the B District gross square footage figures. Wellness Centers limited to employees and hotel guests within the PUD shall not exceed a maximum of 40,000 s.f.,and shall not he counted towards overall square footage. There shall be no offsite memberships. The above referenced wellness center shall be located west of Goodlette-Frank Road. 4.3 PERMITTED USES AND STRUCTURES No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or part, for other than the following: A. Permitted Principal Uses and Structures: 1. Apparel and Accessory Stores (Groups 5611-5699) 2. Breweries (Group 2082) 3. Building Contractors (Groups 1521-1542), except for general contractors for mobile home repair on site, modular housing and premanufactured housing assembled on site, dry cleaning plant construction, paper pulp mill construction, and truck and automobile assembly plant construction. 4. Business Services(Groups 7311-7313,7319,7322,7323,7331-7338,7352, 7359-7389 except for industrial truck rental and leasing; plants, live: rental and leasing; toilets, portable: rental and leasing; employment agencies, except theatrical and motion picture; labor contractors (employment agencies)model registries; labor pools;manpower pools; modeling service; dogs, rental of: for protective service; automobile recovery service; automobile repossession service; bartering services for businesses; bondspersons; bottle exchanges; check validation service; contractors disbursement control; filling pressure containers (aerosol) with hair spray, Words struck through are deleted; words underlined are added. 2017 CP UD Amendment 4-1 April 10, 2018 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1307 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) insecticides, etc.; fire extinguishers, service of gas systems, contract conversion from manufactured to natural gas;metal slitting and shearing on a contract or fee basis produce weighing service, not connected with transportation; scrap steel cutting on a contract or fee basis; solvents recovery service on a contract or fee basis; tobacco sheeting service on a contract or fee basis) 5. Child Day Care Services (Group 8351) 6. Convenience Store, food market(Group 5411) only two (2) allowed within the PUD and Gasoline Filling Station (Group 5541) only one (1) allowed within the PUD. 7. Communications(Groups 4812-4899), not including major communication towers related to cellular phone service, radio broadcasting, television broadcasting, radar or telephone service. 8. Dance and Martial Arts Studios (Groups 7911 and 7999, including only gymnastics and martial arts instruction) 9. Depository and Non-Depository Institutions (Groups 6011-6163) including automatic teller machines 10. Drugs and Medicines (Groups 2833-2836 except for adrenal derivatives: bulk,uncompounded;barbituric acid and derivatives:bulk,uncompounded; cocaine and derivatives; codeine and derivatives; gland derivatives: bulk, uncompounded;mercury chlorides,U.S.P;mercury compounds,medicinal: organic and inorganic; morphine and derivatives; opium derivatives) 11. Eating Places(Group 5812)not including stand alone drive-thru restaurants. 12. Educational Services (Groups 8249-8299 except construction equipment operation schools; truck driving schools; automobile driving instruction; survival schools; vocational counseling) 13. Engineering, Accounting, Research, Management and Related Services Groups 8711-8748 except chemical laboratories, commercial research; automobile proving and testing grounds; metallurgical testing laboratories; pollution testing, except automotive emissions testing; radiation dosimetry laboratories; seed testing laboratories; veterinary testing laboratories) 14. Government Offices/Buildings (Groups 9111-9199, 9221, 9222, 9224- 9229, 9311, 9451, 9511-9532, 9611, 9631-9661) 15. Hardware Stores (Group 5251) 16. Home Furniture, Furnishings and Equipment Stores (Groups 5712-5736) Words ltlrough are deleted; words underlined are added. 2017 CPUD Amendment 4-2 April 10, 2018 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1308 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 17. Hotels/Motels (Group 7011); not to exceed a maximum of 450-349 rooms for the entire PUD. Only 4-2 hotels/motels isare permitted within the PUD_ Gait Only one hotel/motel it mustmay be located east of Goodlette-Frank Road. and shall not exceed 180 rooms, and only one hotel/motel may be located west of Goodlette Frank Road. The hotel/motel west of Goodlette Frank Road shall be located on Tract 6, not to exceed 169 rooms. andis subject to additionallhui ingspecific development standards and setbacks idemi€red-in Section 4.4. 18. Miscellaneous Food Stores (Group 5499) i8:19. Miscellaneous General Merchandise Stores (Group 5399) 4-9720. Miscellaneous Retail (Groups 5912-5949 and 5992-5999, excluding used merchandise stores, fireworks, gravestones, tombstones and monuments, ice dealers, sales barns, and swimming pools; retail) 20.21. Paint/Glass and Wallpaper(Group 5231) 21.22. Personal Services (Groups 7215, excluding self-service or coin laundries, 7221-7251, 7291 and 7299, including only clothing rental, costume rental, tanning salons and hair services) 22.23. Professional Offices: Travel Agencies (Group 4724); Insurance Agencies Group 6411); Insurance Carriers(Groups 6311-6399);Real Estate(Groups 6512-6515, 6517, 6519, 6531, 6541, 6552, 6553); Holding and Other Investment Offices (Groups 6712-6799); Attorneys (Group 8111) 23.24. Physical Fitness Facilities (Group 7991) 2425. Retail Bakeries (Group 5461) 25.26. Security and Commodity Brokers (Groups 6211-6289) 26.27. Any other use or service which is comparable in nature with the foregoing uses and is otherwise clearly consistent with the intent and purpose statement of the District and which the Community Development and Environmental Services Administrator determines to be compatible in this District. B. Restricted Principal Uses The following medical related uses must be located within 1/4 mile radius of the hospital property boundary. 1. Group housing for the elderly limited to assisted living facilities, independent living units, skilled nursing units and continuing care Words struelk-through are deleted; words underlined are added. 2017 CPUD Amendment 4-3 April 10, 2018 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1309 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) retirement communities. A maximum of 400 aggregate beds shall be permitted for the uses listed in Sections 3.3.B.1, 3.3.B.2, 4.3.B.1 and 4.3.B.3. These uses are limited to parcels located east of Goodlette-Frank Road. 2. Drug Stores and Proprietary Stores (Group 5912) only one (1) drug store allowed. 3. Health Services, Medical Clinics and Offices (Groups 8011-8049, 8052), a maximum of 400 aggregate beds shall be permitted for the uses listed in Sections 3.3.B.1, 3.3.B.2,4.3.B.1 and 4.3.B.3. SIC Code 8052 land uses are limited to parcels located east of Goodlette-Frank Road. 4. Medical Laboratories and research and Rehabilitative Centers (Groups 8071-8099) 5. Any other use or service which is comparable in nature with the foregoing uses and is otherwise clearly consistent with the intent and purpose statement of the District and which the Community Development and Environmental Services Administrator determines to be compatible in this District. C. Permitted Accessory Uses and Structures 1. Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with principal uses permitted in this district, including indoor and outdoor recreational facilities, including but not limited to physical fitness facilities, playfields and fitness trails on areas not designated IC or 13 on the PUD Master Plan. Stadiums shall be prohibited. 2. Retail and wholesale sales and/or display areas as accessory to the principal use,not to exceed an area greater than forty percent(40%)of the gross floor area of the permitted principal use. D. Operational Requirements for Group Housing Group housing uses described in Section 4.2.B.1 shall provide the following services and/or be subject to the following operational standards: 1. The facility shall be for residents 55 years of age and older. 2. There shall be on-site dining for the residents. 3. Group transportation services shall be provided for residents for the purposes of grocery and other types of shopping. Individual transportation services may be provided for the residents' individualized needs including but not limited to medical office visits. Words struelk-Brough are deleted; words underlined are added. 2017 CPUD Amendment 4-4 April 10, 2018 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1310 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 4. There shall be an on-site manager/activities coordinator to assist residents with their individual needs. The manager/coordinator shall also be responsible for arranging trips to off-site events as well as planning for lectures, movies, music and other entertainment for the residents at the on-site clubhouse. 5. A wellness center shall be provided on-site. Exercise and other fitness programs shall be provided for the residents. 6. Each unit shall be equipped to notify emergency service providers in the event of medical or other emergency. 7. Each unit shall be designed to accommodate residents with physical impairments(handicaps)as required by the applicable building codes and federal law and regulation. 4.4 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS A. Minimum Lot Area: 20,000 S.F. B. Minimum Lot Width: 100 FT. C. Minimum Yard Requirements: 1. Front Yard, Immokalee and Goodlette-Frank Roads: Fifty feet(50') 2. Front Yard, Internal Roads: Thirty feet(30') 3. Side Yard: Ten feet(10') Five feet (5') to internal property line along the Pine Ridge canal drainage easement and FP&L easement 4. Waterfront: Zero feet (0')to bulkhead or rip-rap at top of bank, otherwise twenty feet(20') 5. Rear Yard: Twenty-five feet(25') 6. Minimum Building Setback from Perimeter Boundary of PUD for Properties West of Goodlette-Frank Road: a) Fifty feet(50') for buildings up to thirty five feet (35') in height. b) Three additional feet(3') for every one foot of building height over thirty five feet (35') adjoining residential districts. Words struck-through are deleted; words underlined are added. 2017 CPDD Amendment 4-5 Apri110, 2018 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1311 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 7. For Properties East of Goodlette-Frank Road: Minimum Building Setback from Perimeter Boundary of PUD and from Public Roadways: a) Immokalee Road: Minimum of fifty feet (50') plus for any portion of a building exceeding a zoned height of fifty feet(50'),that portion of the building shall have its building setback increased at a 1:3 ratio i.e. one (1') vertical foot of height for every three (3') horizontal feet); or For any portion of a hotel that may be constructed on the B designated tract at the southeast corner of Goodlette-Frank Road and Immokalee Road, a minimum three hundred fifty foot (350') building setback from Immokalee Road. b) Goodlette-Frank Road: Minimum of fifty feet (50') and for any portion of a building exceeding a zoned height of fifty feet (50'), that portion of the building shall have the setback increased at a 1:2 ratio(i.e.one(1')vertical foot of height for every two(2')horizontal feet); or For any portion of a hotel on the B designated tract on the southeast corner of Immokalee Road and Goodlette-Frank Road, the minimum setback from Goodlette-Frank Road shall be seventy-five 75') regardless of height. D. Maximum Height(Zoned): For parcels west of Goodlette-Frank Road,three stories over parking to a maximum of fifty feet (50') except that no structure shall be greater than thirty-five feet (35'), on property west of the Pine Ridge Drainage Easement. For Properties East of Goodlette-Frank Road: a) The group housing for the elderly and intermediate care facilities constructed on the B designated tract located at the southeast quadrant of the Goodlette-Frank Road and Immokalee Road intersection shall have a zoned height of sixty feet (60') and an actual height of seventy feet (70'), except that a hotel building or structure associated with this use may not exceed a zoned height of seventy five feet (75') and an actual height of eighty five (85'). All other uses on Tract 9 on the Master Plan shall be permitted to have a zoned height of seventy five feet (75') and an actual height of eighty five (85') b) The group housing for the elderly and intermediate care facilities constructed on the easternmost B designated tract adjacent to Immokalee Road, as shown on the Master Plan, shall have a zoned height of sixty feet 60') and an actual height of seventy feet(70'). Words st-Puelf-through are deleted; words underlined are added. 2017 CPUD Amendment 4-6 Apri110, 2018 CA9 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1312 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) c) All other uses permitted pursuant to Section IV shall be limited to a maximum zoned height of fifty (50') and an actual height of sixty(60'). E. Commercial design guidelines for facilities in the Business District shall be subject to the provisions of Division 2.8. Architectural and Site Design Standards and Site Design Standards for commercial buildings and projects-. except buildings located on the southern portion of Tract 3. Buildings located in the southern portion of Tract 3 as labeled on the Master Plan shall be subject to the deviation process in Section 5.05.08 of the LDC (see Section 4.5.3, Development Deviations, of this PUD Ordinance). F. Outside storage or display shall be permitted and shall be screened from all internal and external public roadways with a fence at least seven feet in height above ground level, or landscaping equivalent or combination thereof. Said fence, wall or landscaped screen shall be opaque in design. 4.5 DEVELOPMENT DEVIATIONS 1. Deviation from LDC Section 5.05.04 D.1 which establishes a .45 floor area ratio FAR) for group housing uses, to permit an FAR of .6 for group housing uses, including the intermediate care facility. 2. Deviation from LDC Section 5.06.04.F.3 Directory signs, which authorizes one (1) directory sign to be located at the project entrance, to permit installation of the directory sign on Immokalee Road east of Goodlette-Frank Road, not at the project entry, but rather at a location between the project entry and Goodlette-Frank Road. 3. Deviation from LI)C Section 5.05.08.G. Deviations and alternate compliance. which authorizes the County Manager or designee to administratively approve deviations from compliance with Section 5.05.08 of the LDC for specific types of buildin{us, to allow general office and medical office, hotel and physical fitness facilities that can be constructed on the southern portion of Tract 3 of the Master Plan to be eligible for this deviation process. 4.6 LANDSCAPE BUFFER RESTRICTIONS The use of bald cypress trees to meet the landscape buffer requirements in section 2.19.A.2 and B.2) are prohibited. Words st-ruelf-through are deleted; words underlined are added. 2017 CPUD Amendment 4-7 April 10, 2018 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1313 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) SECTION V PRESERVE AREA 5.1 PURPOSE The purpose of this Section is to identify permitted uses and development standards for the area within Creekside Commerce Park, designated on the Master Plan, as Preserve Area. 5.2 GENERAL DESCRIPTION Areas designated as Preserve Area on the Master Plan are designed to accommodate natural systems existing or created as preserves and limited water management uses and functions. 5.3 PERMITTED USES AND STRUCTURES No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land or water used, in whole or in part, for other than the following: A. Permitted Uses and Structures 1. Boardwalks and nature trails (excluding asphalt paved trails). 2. Water management structures. 3. Any other preserve and related open space activity or use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing uses,permitted in accordance with the LDC and which the Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA) or Hearing Examiner determines to be compatible in the Preserve Area. 5.4 PRESERVE DISTRICT PRESERVATION EASEMENT A non-exclusive preservation easement or tract is required by LDC Section 3.2.8.4.7.3. for preservation lands included in the Preserve Area. The Developer, its successor or assign shall be responsible for the control and maintenance of lands within the Preserve Area. Exact location/boundary of the Preserve Area will be determined during the development permitting process with the South Florida Water Management District, Army Corps of Engineers, and Collier County. Words struck through are deleted, words underlined are added. 2017 CPUD Amendment 5-1 April 10, 2018 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1314 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 5.5 PRESERVE AREA ADJUSTMENTS The proposed native vegetation retention areas,depicted on the Creekside Commerce Park Master Plan, are intended for meeting the native vegetation requirements of the Collier County Growth Management Plan and the Collier County LDC. Adjustments may be made to the location of the preservations areas at the time of preliminary plat or site development plan approval. If adjustments are needed, per the Collier County LDC the Developer will have the option to increase the preservation in another area, enhance and preserve another area, or provide increased native landscape per the Collier County LDC. The proposed preservation areas, including acres of wetlands and 4.1 acres of uplands, depicted on the Creekside Commerce Park master plan,are areas where the native vegetation requirements may be met on-site as set forth in the Collier County LDC. Words struck-through are deleted; words underlined are added. 2017 CPUD Amendment 5-2 April 10, 2018 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1315 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) rA x0B-s rNYId8315YNlY111d3ONOOa- :""'";•..a8LBIHX3TNYd832121X039QfSTPd7JIMINip*J) oa 91OZIVZIOL G SIAnamarstr>6uII V OFaaaaaaa +1 WNooh +I H H -H o g m.mc,(7,,2 ca' Ne-1Ooi t0 vJQNco1YCT(NI f4 COQ O3 = a~i=a II II II II II II ItALL_ ' Jl. 1Oa rc auN '.`z aSN= 2" LLw .w H1 V 1 W WamLLLLa$m iOlau :a SMI 8 _ W V NNaZSi0FZw0.- 3 } E o i.nalLe xIO 6 IXEQV111N N J C 4 X g a a a I it. WWz a ' aa0 v > za 11.1 ww A 1...b l..-., a= Z I I I I a d Qr NsmF m lU CREEKSIDE= VD E [ )( n# m a a F o ii .Ivd I.. 1 a iW,a r P = I W I6 s 5 rWm o u mI- g— a L 1 i2P Qa 15 LLm edJ F c a m t p i, i to N w a dOtl tld 1113'10000 .. 6'•u .. I — 1 HIdl z 21,,,,S1 0po a , v< i 3 I I 1 t J UO L I mC t la i1[1-'7--- 0 1 = ` ' CCRE0010E STREET ` _ _ Y 2 9+J 19dd W i l 6m tit"`` Ow 3NId 1 aj..... -:;_ 131-11-11,-...-_-.—_---N3 1s wwrvn y_ _,._.. y I I < III 1Ig11f i a U i a m N i' mg a 1i 1 f- W 3 1 CREEKSIDE TR. a, M N IEla N3 a. ( y UU o U1 5 l•–• re I— t a C J w 1 II t W Z W U Al ' V d g v I 1l'1CC I Q N U E m h i U w y 1-0 _ Zp j v Q I is aCe 0I— (iJ \I tqIII J , , . w oLL CJ Z O ARTHREX BOULEVARD I i II 8. aq gay a as y a8 13H) d W2 Q1 Wim 15:a a3j om 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1316 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) r s1•111,1113181,14tYf•1d3 NOJ ,.:::::I=1, .,wry . """"^ ""'' O1e0eY ypn 1^" 840ZIZ0/ZO CI3SIn3U8L81N%3 If1111i i11'J AM 138.711NO3 IOfSMaTdJ sae usue.n Inatxotp>atra nrv,Zit4IQQQQQcohWWWWOo -i it ii it '1'I O a mg.- a Ll172OOI ,D KoaLLTrNNTr (NI C71 I< 01 .-1 O y1gk'o qza a II II II II II II II IIIt-ww+ -Oo 4 aar 'i 7 2 Tv' K= U',Kli!I O"43 ,, 3` N. U wWma w _ Wf• u411g." WatwU~Q N W Wii2 1 NKK I- T I is F o ZZ — -J wo 4 gym Sr C +-r Q zR wQ Ii yv i$ VA l3 g eTY v { O W yW 8R N= = HmOZ `J° aa0 I— o za ffi 11-1 r CREEKSIDE BLVD E l_]/'`- Um J a aBT{. a o a 1 - I 7r7". dh 5 Us 7 re0- lb W m 01N h r LL t"i'. my I- U F- .., I iI '.z= ff <m E UU r U ( i a dam o°' Q- z= y9 1- J J_Ii` tea- I. R -y y r —aOtl *01114 1314000. SoT._.r,--i 1{i 41 I 1 0.IZ n S r\ I H 4, _ x awm U[0 i 6q .?...g L_ aN < —1r< JJ 1I m M it i — ai l 1 S g , fV I I ,y ggVLa8 law g$$ p 0,,, s_, I }3 ,rt W 1 i Et CREEKSIDE STREET _... _ Y t. iii G' Wo iNsw +s,w+ wx itL2 s J 1N3N3STY390, YN H,YNY 300, iy _..- - • N t ! at C< fit I F- esi 03 n R LL W CREEKSIDE TR. a, i i F0- M IEEP O 0 M U U m O i. a K N! CO M. CcW A x t5 aNy -Rv 3331 iI Wj W my LL a.r C `4 Oa I I U O D3 V ' 1 3 t d v v 1 \v I t 1''- i 04 1 [ 6) 1 U 1 I _ la t w 1-mag R v'. ; saw - \_____ J 3, x... ,.L,,, <-±. Z O 1-- ARTHREX BOULEVARD t p e "i ep I' III; itSV', ZS 6 ' P22z,v1 t,'3°-ii ' 7- .!q s co ffip.; 3Toff- / O` m 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1317 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) EXHIBIT B1 CROSS SECTIONS (ENLARGED) INTERNAL PARCEL PARKING STREET UGKT HEDGE CANOPY TREE CANOPY TREE PARCEL ENTRANCE MONUMENT SDEWALK er HEDGE INTERNAL PARCEL PARKING MD Ian. 41 MINIMO a 4 z f2 1•? 4:.: 4' 1.11 Yfe,S• a' CO TYPICAL STREET CROSS SECTION NSA INTERNAL PARCEt.PARKING STREET LIGHT HEDGE CANOPY TREE CANOPY TREE f PARCEL ENTRANCE MONUMENT SDEWALK I ZHEDGE INTERNAL PARCEL i PARKING 1CtI' ' T r]l tC f2'N S sI. " T'^rY I WKX r4 5L5' 1 0 TYPICAL STREET CROSS SECTION N.T.f INTERNAL PARCEL PARKING STREET LIGHT HEDGE CANOPY TREE CANOPY TREE PARCEL ENTRANCE MONUMENT SIDEWALK HEDGE INTERNAL PARCEL PARKING no mum AlliMimp a I S'1Y 14' t r S' WE- WALK I tA' 1 I 1104X Mr r. 64' O TYPICAL STREET CROSS SECTION KT.S 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1318 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) i L.......J4- itiv i r , 4 1 t 4 il At t.- A X 14 S !1 1 4 0' 1 . 1, 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1319 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) conE, N. Aot,..96 4,, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT Of STATE RICK SCOTT KEN DETZNER Governor Secretary of State April 26, 2018 Honorable Dwight E. Brock Clerk of the Circuit Court Collier County Post Office Box 413044 Naples,Florida 34101-3044 Attention: Martha Vergara Dear Mr. Brock: Pursuant to the provisions of Section 125.66, Florida Statutes,this will acknowledge receipt of your electronic copy of Collier County Ordinance No. 18-19, which was filed in this office on April 26, 2018. Sincerely, Ernest L. Reddick Program Administrator ELR/lb R. A. Gray Building • 500 South Bronough Street • Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0250 Telephone: (850) 245-6270 www.dos.state.tl.us 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1320 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) Collier County School District School Impact Analysis Application Instructions: Submit one copy of completed application and location map for each new residential project requiring a determination of school impact to the Planning Department of the applicable local government. This application will not be deemed complete until all applicable submittal requirements have been submitted. Please be advised that additional documentation/information may be requested during the review process. For information regarding this application process, please contact the Facilities Management Department at 239-377-0267. Please check [¥] type of application request (one only): [ ] School Capacity Review [ ] Exemption Letter [ ] Concurrency Determination [ ] Concurrency Determination Amendment For descriptions of the types of review please see page 3, _________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ I. Project Information: Project Name: ___________________________________________ Municipality: _________________________________ Parcel ID#: (attach separate sheet for multiple parcels): _______________________________________________________ Location/Address of subject property: ____________________________________________________ (Attach location map) Closest Major Intersection: _______________________________________________________________________________ II. Ownership/Agent Information: Owner/Contract Purchaser Name(s): _____________________________________________________________________ Agent/Contact Person: ________________________________________________________________________________ (Please note that if agent or contact information is completed the District will forward all information to that person) Mailing address: _____________________________________________________________________________________ Telephone#: _____________________________ Fax: _________________________Email_________________________ I hereby certify the statements and/or information contained in this application with any attachments submitted herewith are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. _____________________________________________________ _____________________________ Owner or Authorized Agent Signature Date _________________________________________________________________________________________ III. Development Information Project Data (Unit Types defined on page 2 of application) Current Land Use Designation: Proposed Land Use Designation: Current Zoning: Proposed Zoning: Project Acreage: Unit Type: SF MF MH C G Total Units Currently Allowed by Type: Total Units Proposed by Type: Is this a phased project: Yes or No If yes, please complete page 2 of this application. Date/time stamp:___________________________ herewith are true and correct ______________________________ Creekside Commerce Park PUD Collier County See Property Owner List Creekside Commerce Park PUD Immokalee Road and Goodlette-Frank Road Creekside East Inc. D. Wayne Arnold, AICP Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A., 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, FL 34134 239-947-1144 warnold@gradyminor.com June 22, 2020 Commercial Commercial and Residential Creekside Commerce Park CPUD Creekside Commerce Park CPUD 0 300 ✔ 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1321 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) Worksheet is required to be completed by the Applicant only if the project is to be phased:Unit Type Yr1 Yr2 Yr3 Yr4 Yr5 Yr6 Yr7 Yr8 Yr9 Yr10 Yr 11-20 20+ YearsSFMFMHCGTotals by YrGrand TotalGrand TotalInsert totals by unit type by years.Unit Types:SF = Single FamilyMF = Multi-Family/Apartments MH = Mobile HomesC = Condo/Co-OpG = GovernmentEXAMPLE:Unit Type Yr1 Yr2 Yr3 Yr4 Yr5 Yr6 Yr7 Yr8 Yr9 Yr10 Yr 11-20 20+ YearsSF 25 25 25 25 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --MF 50 0 0 0 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --MH N/ACN/AGN/ATotals by Yr75 25 25 25 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --Grand Total 150.29.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1322 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) Types of Reviews: School Impact Analysis: This review should be divided into two categories: -School Capacity Review (land use and rezonings), and; -Concurrency Determinations (site plans and subdivisions). School Capacity Review is the review of a project in the land use and rezoning stage of development. It is a review of the impact of the development on school capacity and is considered long range planning. This may be a review resulting in mitigation being required. In situations where the applicant may be required to mitigate, capacity may be reserved dependent on the type of mitigation. Concurrency Determination is the review of residential site plans and subdivisions to determine whether there is available capacity. When capacity is determined to be available a School Capacity Determination Letter (SCADL) will be issued verifying available capacity to the applicant and the local government. If a project exceeds the adopted level of service standards, the applicant is afforded the option of a negotiation period that may or may not result in an executed/recorded mitigation agreement Mitigation at this stage is expressed as a Proportionate Share Mitigation Agreement. For those residential developments that may have an impact but are otherwise exempt from concurrency, an exemption letter will be prepared for the applicant upon request. For those residential developments that are determined to not have an impact, a letter of no impact will be prepared for the applicant upon request. Exemption Letter: An applicant may request an Exemption Letter as documentation for the local government. These are projects that would be exempt from school concurrency review or projects that do not impact the public schools. Exemptions from school concurrency are limited to existing single family or mobile home lots of record; amendments to previously approved site plans or plats that do not increase the number of dwelling units or change the dwelling unit type; age restricted communities with no permanent residents under the age of 18; or residential site plans or plats or amendments to site plans or plats that generate less than one student; or are authorized as a Development of Regional Impact (Chapter 380, F.S.) as of July 1, 2005. Concurrency Determination Amendment: An applicant may request an amendment to a previously issued School Concurrency Determination or to an application being processed. This review may require additional staff time beyond the initial concurrency determination review and results in a modified determination being issued. An amendment could result in a negotiation period and/or a mitigation agreement being issued or a previously approved determination being modified and reissued. 3 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1323 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA)                                     !  "!" # $ %&' ' %&'&(( )  ! " 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1324 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) Creekside Commerce Park CPUD (PL20190002850) Property Owner List March 19, 2020 Page 1 of 1 Property Owner List.docx Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, FL 34134  239-947-1144  engineering@gradyminor.com  www.gradyminor.com Parcel No. Property Owner Property Address Subdivision / Condo Tract Unit 23991198024 Creekside East Inc. 1514 Immokalee Rd. Creekside Corners Condominium 1 23991198040 Creekside East Inc. 1267 Creekside Blvd E Creekside Corners Condominium 2 29331180023 Creekside East Inc. Creekside Commerce Park East 2 29331180049 Creekside East Inc. Creekside Commerce Park East 3 29331180544 Creekside East Inc. Creekside Commerce Park East 4 29331180560 Creekside East Inc. Creekside Commerce Park East 4A 29331180586 Creekside East Inc. Creekside Commerce Park East 4B 29331180609 Creekside East Inc. Creekside Commerce Park East 5 29331181103 Creekside East Inc. Creekside Commerce Park East 6 29331181129 Creekside East Inc. Creekside Commerce Park East P-1 29331181145 Creekside East Inc. Creekside Commerce Park East P-2 29331181161 Creekside East Inc. Creekside Commerce Park East P-3 29333000046 Creekside East Inc. Creekside East Land Condominium 2 Creekside East, Inc. 2600 Golden Gate Parkway Naples Florida 34105 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1325 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) Creekside Commerce Park CPUD – PL20190002850 Deviation Justification May 14, 2021 Page 1 of 2 BCCPUD-19 Deviation Justification.docx Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, FL 34134  239-947-1144  engineering@gradyminor.com  www.gradyminor.com Deviation 1 (B Districts): Approved Ordinance 13-23 Deviation 2 (B District): Approved Ordinance 16-05 Deviation 3 (B District): Approved Ordinance 18-19 Deviation 4 (B District): New Deviation, see Section 4.5.4 of the PUD. 4. Deviation 4 seeks relief from LDC Section 4.06.02.C.2, “Table 2.4 Table of Buffer Requirements by Land Use Classifications”, which requires Residential (RMF-6, RMF-12, RMF-16) multifamily district/use adjacent to Commercial 3 (C-1, C-2, C-3, C-4, C- 5); Business Park (BP) district/use to provide a 15’ wide type ‘B’ landscape buffer, to allow no buffer between the proposed residential use and the existing commercial use located to the north and a shared 15 foot wide type ‘B’ buffer with the institutional use located to the south. Justification: Tract 8 within the Creekside PUD is proposed to have a residential development option, making this portion of the PUD to be a mixed-use project which is intended to have a more urban form. A portion of Tract 8 has been developed with retail and office uses and the proposed residential units will have the ability to share internal infrastructure such as parking and drive aisles with the retail facility. This form of development is not unlike that found at Mercato where residential buildings and non-residential uses are located adjacent to each other. The projects share the same parent ownership and will share infrastructure within the PUD. The future residents will be provided notice as part of their unit lease that they will be living in a mixed use area and will be subject to commercial uses and noise associated with such use. 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1326 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) Page 2 of 2 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1327 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1328 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. Ph. 239-947-1144 Fax. 239-947-0375 3800 Via Del Rey EB 0005151 LB 0005151 LC 26000266 Bonita Springs, FL 34134 www.gradyminor.com Project Location Map NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING Petitions PL20190002849 Creekside Commerce Park East Mixed Use Subdistrict (GMPA) and PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUD Amendment (PUDA) A Neighborhood Information Meeting hosted by D. Wayne Arnold, AICP, of Q. Grady Minor and Associates, P.A. and Richard D. Yovanovich, Esq. of Coleman, Yovanovich & Koester, P.A., representing Creekside East, Inc. (Applicant) will be held on Wednesday, January 6, 2021, 5:30 pm at Saint Monica’s Episcopal Church, 7070 Immokalee Road, Naples, FL 34119. Individuals who would like to participate remotely or have questions or comments should contact Sharon Umpenhour, Senior Planning Technician with Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. by email: sumpenhour@gradyminor.com, phone: 239-947-1144, or mail: 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, FL 34134. Project information is posted online at www.gradyminor.com/planning. Creekside East, Inc. has submitted formal applications to Collier County, seeking approval of a Small-Scale Growth Management Plan (GMP) Amendment and a Planned Unit Development (PUD) Amendment. The GMP amendment proposes to revise the Future Land Use Element to create the Creekside Commerce Park East Mixed Use Subdistrict. The plan amendment establishes a maximum of 300 multi-family rental units to be constructed in the 9.9± acre subdistrict, which will be located on the east side Goodlette-Frank Road within the ‘B’ District of the Creekside Commerce Park PUD. The companion PUD amendment proposes to amend the Creekside Commerce Park PUD to construct a maximum of 300 multi-family dwelling units east of Goodlette-Frank Road as a development option. The addition of the residential use is to the ‘B’ District within the PUD. The maximum vehicular trip generation figure in Section 2.16.L has not been revised with the addition of the multi-family residential use because the PUD proposes no change to the previously established trip cap. The Conceptual PUD Master Plan has been modified to show the Creekside Commerce Park East Mixed Use Subdistrict located east of Goodlette- Frank Road. The GMP amendment subject property is comprised of approximately 9.9± acres, located within the Creekside Commerce Park PUD east of Goodlette-Frank Road. The Creekside Commerce Park PUD is comprised of 106± acres, located on the southwest and southeast quadrant of Immokalee Road and Goodlette-Frank Road in Section 27, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. The Neighborhood Information Meeting is for informational purposes only, it is not a public hearing. 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1329 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 1NAME1 NAME2 NAME3 NAME4 NAME5 NAME6 LEGAL1 LEGAL2 LEGAL3 LEGAL4 FOLIOA K S SW FLORIDA LLC 743 BENTWATER CIR APT 201NAPLES, FL 34108---6735 NORTH NAPLES MEDICAL PARK LOT 264280000426ARHC BSNPLFL01 LLC 1735 MARKET ST A400PHILADELPHIA, PA 19103---0 CREEKSIDE EAST LAND CONDOMINIUM UNIT 129333000020ARTHUR J WARBURTON REV TRUST MARGARET MARY EILEEN WARBURTON REVOCABLE TRUST1395 REMINGTON CT #9202 NAPLES, FL 34110---0 REMINGTON RESERVE A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 90469229000725BARBOT TR, IVONNE MARTINEZ IVONNE MARTINEZ BARBOT TRUST 1375 REMINGTON CT #7101NAPLES, FL 34110---942 REMINGTON RESERVE A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 70169229000505BERONJA, BRANKO M & JOANNE M 1355 REMINGTON WAY #5201NAPLES, FL 34110---0 REMINGTON RESERVE A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 40469229000327BERONJA, BRANKO M & JOANNE M 1355 REMINGTON WAY UNIT 5201NAPLES, FL 34110---0 REMINGTON RESERVE A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 50369229000385BONNEY K LETT REV TRUST 1340 REMINGTON WAY APT 10202NAPLES, FL 34110---938 REMINGTON RESERVE A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 100469229000806BRONSNICK, DEANNA D 50 STERLING DRCHATHAM, NJ 07928---0 REMINGTON RESERVE A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 70469229000563C TURTLE OF NAPLES INC 5455 JAEGER RD STE ANAPLES, FL 34109---5805 GULFCOAST MEDICAL ARTS CENTER A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 3-A48501000189CBYW NAPLES PROPCO LLC % WELLTOWER INC 4500 DORR STREETTOLEDO, OH 43615---0 SOUTHWEST PROFESSIONAL HEALTH PARK TRACT A74445100504CBYW NAPLES PROPCO LLC % WELLTOWER INC 4500 DORR STREETTOLEDO, OH 43615---0 SOUTHWEST PROFESSIONAL HEALTH PARK TRACT P74445101325CHERYL P SACHS TRUST 1315 REMINGTON WAY UNIT 1202NAPLES, FL 34110---0 REMINGTON RESERVE A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 10469229000084COLLIER CNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 3301 TAMIAMI TRL ENAPLES, FL 34112---0 26 48 25 SW1/4 OF NW1/4 LESS E 30FT & E 60FT OF N 60FT 39.05 AC OR 11O6 PG 1648 00166840007COLLIER CNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 3301 TAMIAMI TRL E BLDG FNAPLES, FL 34112---4902 27 48 25 COMM SE CNR SEC W100.04FT, N 2637.85FT, CONT N 1315.14FT, E 100.01FT, S 1314.70FT, CONT S 2640.71FT 00168040009COLLIER CNTY TRANSPORTATION RIGHT-OF-WAY 2885 HORSESHOE DRIVE SNAPLES, FL 34104---0 26 48 25 COM AT N1/4 CNR SEC 26, S 100' & POB, S 89 DEG W 146.02', S 50', N 89 DEG E 146.5', N 50' TO POB AND COMM 00167720100COLLIER CNTY TRANSPORTATION RIGHT-OF-WAY 2885 HORSESHOE DRIVE SNAPLES, FL 34104---0 PORTION OF TR B OF COLLIER HEALTH PARK DESC IN OR 3690 PG 3601 27167500400COLLIER CNTY TRANSPORTATION RIGHT-OF-WAY 2885 HORSESHOE DRIVE SNAPLES, FL 34104---0 FRANK BOULEVARD (FRANK BOULEVARD C-851) & THAT PORTION ADDED FOR ROAD WIDEN- ING AS DESC IN OR 3057 PG 3387 34500000107COLLIER HEALTH CARE INC PO BOX 413029NAPLES, FL 34101---3029 NORTH NAPLES MEDICAL PARK LOT 764280000523COLLIER HEALTH CARE INC PO BOX 413029NAPLES, FL 34101---3029 COLLIER HEALTH PARK THAT PORT OF TRACT "C" DESC AS: COM SWCNR LOT 7 NORTH NAPLES MEDICAL PARK, S 31'17"W 5.39FT, N 8927167550214COLLIER HEALTH PARK OWNERS' ASSOCIATION INC 560 DELAWARE AVE #300BUFFALO, NY 14202---0 COLLIER HEALTH PARK TRACT D, LESS THAT PORTION VACATED ON RES # 91-634 OR 1650 PG 1686 27167550405COLLIER'S RESERVE ASSOC INC 11711 COLLIERS RESERVE DRNAPLES, FL 34110---909 COLLIER'S RESERVE TRACT "R", LESS THAT PORTION DESC IN OR 2476 PG 1125 REF AS CROSSPOINTE DR, LESS THAT 27185003251COLLIER'S RESERVE ASSOC INC 11715 COLLIERS RESERVE DRNAPLES, FL 34110---909 COLLIER'S RESERVE TRACT 01-06 LESS THAT PART LYING E OF TR R DESC IN OR 3659 PG 3087 27185003756COOLCHANGE LAND TRUST 1315 REMINGTON WAY #1102NAPLES, FL 34110---0 REMINGTON RESERVE A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 10269229000042COUNTY WATER-SEWER DISTRICT UTILITY DIVISION COLLIER COUNTY COURTHOUSE 3301 TAMIAMI TRL E BLDG F NAPLES, FL 34112---4902 27 48 25 COM SE CNR, W 100FT, N 1500FT TO POB CONT N 2455.41FT, WLY 577.2FT, SLY 886.02FT, WLY 400FT, SLY 00167840006CREEKSIDE COMMERCE PARK PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOC INC 2600 GOLDEN GATE PKWYNAPLES, FL 34101---0 CREEKSIDE COMMERCE PARK WEST UNIT ONE TRACT L1 LESS OR 3661 PG 2087 29331190521CREEKSIDE COMMERCE PARK PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOC INC 2600 GOLDEN GATE PKWYNAPLES, FL 34105---3227 CREEKSIDE COMMERCE PARK WEST UNIT ONE TRACT R29331190660CREEKSIDE COMMERCE PARK PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOC INC 2600 GOLDEN GATE PKWYNAPLES, FL 34105---3227 CREEKSIDE COMMERCE PARK WEST UNIT TWO TRACT R LESS THAT PART DESC IN OR 3926 PG 2925 29331193023CREEKSIDE COMMERCE PARK PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOC INC 2600 GOLDEN GATE PKWYNAPLES, FL 34105---3227 CREEKSIDE COMMERCE PARK WEST UNIT TWO TRACT O329331193065CREEKSIDE COMMERCE PARK PROPERTY OWNERS ASSSN INC 2600 GOLDEN GATE PKWYNAPLES, FL 34105---0 ARTHREX BOULEVARD TRACT O22435007724CREEKSIDE EAST INC % BARRON COLLIER COMPANIES 2600 GOLDEN GATE PARKWAYNAPLES, FL 34105---0 CREEKSIDE EAST LAND CONDOMINIUM UNIT 229333000046CREEKSIDE EAST INC 2600 GOLDEN GATE PKWYNAPLES, FL 34103---0 CREEKSIDE COMMERCE PARK EAST TRACT P-229331181145CREEKSIDE EAST INC 2600 GOLDEN GATE PKWYNAPLES, FL 34105---0 CREEKSIDE CORNERS CONDOMINIUM A COMMERCIAL LAND CONDOMINIUM UNIT 123991198024CREEKSIDE EAST INC 2600 GOLDEN GATE PKWYNAPLES, FL 34105---0 CREEKSIDE CORNERS CONDOMINIUM A COMMERCIAL LAND CONDOMINIUM UNIT 223991198040CREEKSIDE EAST INC 2600 GOLDEN GATE PKWYNAPLES, FL 34105---0 CREEKSIDE COMMERCE PARK EAST TRACT 229331180023CREEKSIDE EAST INC 2600 GOLDEN GATE PKWYNAPLES, FL 34105---0 CREEKSIDE COMMERCE PARK EAST TRACT 3, LESS THAT PORTION NKA CREEKSIDE EAST LAND CONDO AS DESC29331180049CREEKSIDE EAST INC 2600 GOLDEN GATE PKWYNAPLES, FL 34105---0 CREEKSIDE CO MMERCE PARK EAST TRACT 429331180544CREEKSIDE EAST INC 2600 GOLDEN GATE PKWYNAPLES, FL 34105---0 CREEKSIDE COMMERCE PARK EAST TRACT 4A29331180560CREEKSIDE EAST INC 2600 GOLDEN GATE PKWYNAPLES, FL 34105---0 CREEKSIDE COMMERCE PARK EAST TRACT 4B29331180586CREEKSIDE EAST INC 2600 GOLDEN GATE PKWYNAPLES, FL 34105---0 CREEKSIDE COMMERCE PARK EAST, PART OF TR 5. DESC AS FOLL; COMM AT NE CNR 27-48-25, ALG E LI S01 09 43E 696.85 29331180609CREEKSIDE EAST INC 2600 GOLDEN GATE PKWYNAPLES, FL 34105---0 CREEKSIDE COMMERCE PARK EAST TRACT 629331181103CREEKSIDE EAST INC 2600 GOLDEN GATE PKWYNAPLES, FL 34105---0 CREEKSIDE COMMERCE PARK EAST TRACT P-129331181129CREEKSIDE EAST INC 2600 GOLDFEN GATE PKWYNAPLES, FL 34105---0 CREEKSIDE COMMERCE PARK EAST TRACT P-329331181161CREEKSIDE HOSPITALITY LLC 1370 CREEKSIDE BLVDNAPLES, FL 34108---1945 CREEKSIDE COMMERCE PARK WEST UNIT TWO LOT 11 AND THAT PORTION OF LOT 12 AS DESC IN OR 5500 PG 1221 29331193188CREEKSIDE WEST INC % RYAN LLC THREE GALLERIA TOWER 13155 NOEL RD #100 LB73 DALLAS, TX 75240---0 CREEKSIDE COMMERCE PARK WEST UNIT ONE LOT 2, AND E 32.84FT OF LOT 3, LESS OR 3663 PG 2579 29331190709CUMMINGS JR, PAUL A BARBARA M CUMMINGS 12029 COLLIERS RESERVE DRIVENAPLES, FL 34110---0 REMINGTON RESERVE A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 50169229000343D & B CRANDALL FAM LIM PRTNRSH 777 WEDGE DRNAPLES, FL 34103---4447 ROYAL PALM BUILDING A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 10171360000041D'ALESSANDRO, JOSEPH A CYNTHIA A D'ALESSANDRO300 LUZERNE AVEWEST PITTSTON, PA 18643---2234 REMINGTON RESERVE A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 40269229000288DENNIS STABILE DEC OF TRUST 1340 REMINGTON WAY #201NAPLES, FL 34110---0 REMINGTON RESERVE A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 100369229000783DONLEY, DAVID S PO BOX 272PICKERINGTON, OH 43147---0 REMINGTON RESERVE A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 80469229000644DONLEY, MICHAEL D 7600 FARMSBURY DRREYNOLDSBURG, OH 43068---3150 REMINGTON RESERVE A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 30269229000204DUGAN, M KEVIN & MARGARET M 11611 USEPPA CTNAPLES, FL 34110---925 REMINGTON RESERVE A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 50269229000369ECKERTY TR, THOMAS G UNRECORDED LAND TRUST UTD 04/02/9612734 KENWOOD LN STE 89 FORT MYERS, FL 33907---5638 SOUTHWEST PROFESSIONAL HEALTH PARK TRACT R74445101341ENCORE VENTURE LLC 8009 KILKENNY COURTNAPLES, FL 34112---0 ROYAL PALM BUILDING A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 30171360000122ESTATES AT BAY COLONY GOLF CLUB, THE 10495 GOODLETTE-FRANK RD NNAPLES, FL 34109---0 MASHIE COURT AT THE ESTATES AT BAY COLONY GOLF CLUB TRACT A59934000020FARLEY WHITE CHP LLC %FARLEY WHITE INTERESTS LLC 155 FEDERAL STREET STE 1800 BOSTON, MA 02110---0 COLLIER HEALTH PARK CONDOMINIUM A COMMERCIAL LAND CONDOMINIUM UNIT 1 27167400021FARLEY WHITE CHP LLC %FARLEY WHITE INTERESTS LLC 155 FEDERAL STREET STE 1800 BOSTON, MA 02110---0 COLLIER HEALTH PARK CONDOMINIUM A COMMERCIAL LAND CONDOMINIUM UNIT 2 27167400047FLP 1750 LLC PO BOX 492ALPENA, MI 49707---0 RUBELL MEDICAL CENTER CONDOMINIUM A COMMERCIAL LAND CONDOMINIUM UNIT 1 71723900021FLP 1750 LLC PO BOX 492ALPENA, MI 49707---0 RUBELL MEDICAL CENTER CONDOMINIUM A COMMERCIAL LAND CONDOMINIUM UNIT 2 71723900047FLP 1750 LLC PO BOX 492ALPENA, MI 49707---0 RUBELL MEDICAL CENTER CONDOMINIUM A COMMERCIAL LAND CONDOMINIUM UNIT 3 71723900063FRANCES L NAPLES REV LIV TRUST 1345 REMINGTON WAY #4201NAPLES, FL 34110---0 REMINGTON RESERVE A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 40369229000301GALBRAITH, BEVERLY F 1320 REMINGTON WAY UNIT 1201NAPLES, FL 34110---0 REMINGTON RESERVE A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 120169229000903GEORGIA K DANIS REV TRUST 11216 TAMIAMI TRL N # 207NAPLES, FL 34110---1640 REMINGTON RESERVE A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 20369229000149GOLDMAN, LAWRENCE E & CAROL A 1355 REMINGTON WAY #5202NAPLES, FL 34110---0 REMINGTON RESERVE A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 50469229000408HEITMANN TR, TERESA L PETERSEN TR, ROBERT A=& JUDY C TERESA L HEITMANN REV TRUST ROBERT A PETERSEN REV TRUST 1660 MEDICAL BLVD STE 300 NAPLES, FL 34110---1497 ROYAL PALM BUILDING A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 30071360000106HERBKERSMAN, MARY K 1385 REMINGTON CT #8101NAPLES, FL 34110---0 REMINGTON RESERVE A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 80169229000589HOGAN, KAREN B 9751 BENTGRASS BNDNAPLES, FL 34108---1933 BENTGRASS BEND AT THE ESTATES AT BAY COLONY GOLF CLUB LOT 8023932000443ISTOCK TR, JUDITH A JUDITH A ISTOCK TRUST 12/16/93 9659 MASHIE CTNAPLES, FL 34108---1997 MASHIE COURT AT THE ESTATES AT BAY COLONY GOLF CLUB LOT 5559934000062JENSING INC 5550 HERON POINT DR #1102NAPLES, FL 34108---0 GULFCOAST MEDICAL ARTS CENTER A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 1-A48501000024JG PROPERTIES OF NAPLES LLC 3180 FORT CHARLES DRNAPLES, FL 34102---7923 NORTH NAPLES MEDICAL PARK LOT 364280000442JONES, MICHAEL A & JANET E 9671 MASHIE CTNAPLES, FL 34108---1997 MASHIE COURT AT THE ESTATES AT BAY COLONY GOLF CLUB LOT 5859934000127JRW NORTH OFFICE LLC 9130 CORSEA DEL FONTANA WAYNAPLES, FL 34109---0 CITIZENS NATIONAL BANK CENTER A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 11026090000049JSS PROPERTIES INC 5822 SPANISH OAKS LNNAPLES, FL 34119---1154 GULFCOAST MEDICAL ARTS CENTER A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 2-A48501000105JSS PROPERTIES INC 5822 SPANISH OAKS LNNAPLES, FL 34119---1154 GULFCOAST MEDICAL ARTS CENTER A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 2-B48501000121JSS PROPERTIES INC 5822 SPANISH OAKS LNNAPLES, FL 34119---1154 GULFCOAST MEDICAL ARTS CENTER A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 2-D48501000150JUDSON, JACKIE 1340 REMINGTON WAY #1002NAPLES, FL 34110---938 REMINGTON RESERVE A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 100269229000767KALBACH, JAMES C & DONNA L 214 E KING STREETEDENTON, NC 27932---0 REMINGTON RESERVE A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 70269229000521KARP, CLAUDIA 12285 SW 1ST STCORAL SPRINGS, FL 33071---8059 REMINGTON RESERVE A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 100169229000741KSSK LLC 15187 BROLIO WAYNAPLES, FL 34110---2719 GULFCOAST MEDICAL ARTS CENTER A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 1-B48501000040KSSK LLC 15187 BROLIO WAYNAPLES, FL 34110---2719 GULFCOAST MEDICAL ARTS CENTER A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 1-C48501000066L GEORGE KLAUS TRUST 9759 BENTGRASS BNDNAPLES, FL 34108---1933 BENTGRASS BEND AT THE ESTATES AT BAY COLONY GOLF CLUB LOT 7823932000401LARE JR, JOHN & NANCY H 1365 REMINGTON WAY #6201NAPLES, FL 34110---0 REMINGTON RESERVE A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 60369229000466LJZ PROPERTIES LTD 1435 IMMOKALEE RDNAPLES, FL 34110---1401 COLLIER HEALTH PARK REPLAT OF TRACT B-127167550489LUKAS, CYNTHIA A 8749 N CLEAR LAKE RDMILTON, WI 53563---0 REMINGTON RESERVE A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 20169229000107LUND, THOMAS C & CAROL A5150 TAMIAMI TRL N #300NAPLES, FL 34103---0 BENTGRASS BEND AT THE ESTATES AT BAY COLONY GOLF CLUB LOT 7923932000427M T V L LLC 1713 SW HEALTH PKWY STE 1NAPLES, FL 34109---502 SOUTHWEST PROFESSIONAL HEALTH PARK THAT PORTION OF TRACT B1 DESC AS: COM NW CNR TRACT B1, N 89DEG 55'29"E 238.82FT TO A 74445100821MCCONNELL, BRUCE T EMILY J WOLFE36980 FOX RUNFARMINGTON HILLS, MI 48331---0 REMINGTON RESERVE A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 90369229000709MCELROY, WALTER R PAMELA J MCELROY 1375 REMINGTON CT #7201NAPLES, FL 34110---0 REMINGTON RESERVE A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 70369229000547MERCER, THOMAS A & GAIL T 904 COUNTRY CLUB DRIVEBOWLING GREEN, OH 43402---0 REMINGTON RESERVE A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 120269229000929MEYER JR, ANDREW C & KATHLEEN240 FAIRHAVEN HILL RDCONCORD, MA 01742---0 MASHIE COURT AT THE ESTATES AT BAY COLONY GOLF CLUB LOTS 59 AND 60 59934000143MPG HEALTH PARKWAY LLC 6321 DANIEL PWKY #200FORT MYERS, FL 33912---0 SOUTHWEST PROFESSIONAL HEALTH PARK TRACT B1, LESS THAT PORTION DESC IN OR 2598 PG 1508 74445100805NAPE, DAVID J & CYNTHIA J 60 PINECONE LNSHAVERTOWN, PA 18708---9543 REMINGTON RESERVE A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 60269229000440NAPLES 9 LLC 12763 STARK RD STE 101LIVONIA, MI 48150---1535 CITIZENS NATIONAL BANK CENTER A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 10026090000023NAPLES 9 LLC 12763 STARK RD STE 101LIVONIA, MI 48150---1535 CITIZENS NATIONAL BANK CENTER A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 20026090000081NAPLES 9 LLC 12763 STARK RD STE 101LIVONIA, MI 48150---1535 CITIZENS NATIONAL BANK CENTER A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 21026090000104NAPLES 9 LLC 12763 STARK RD STE 101LIVONIA, MI 48150---1535 CITIZENS NATIONAL BANK CENTER A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 30026090000120NAPLES CHIROPRACTIC CENTER INC C/O WHITE HERON WELLNESS CTR 1775 ARLINGTON ST STE 2 SARASOTA, FL 34239---0 GULFCOAST MEDICAL ARTS CENTER A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 2-E48501000163NAPLES COMMUNITY HOSPITAL INC 350 7TH ST NNAPLES, FL 34102---5754 COLLIER HEALTH PARK TRACT C, LESS THAT PORTION DESC IN OR 2445 PG 217727167550201NAPLES COMMUNITY HOSPITAL INC 350 7TH STREET NNAPLES, FL 34102---0 NORTH NAPLES MEDICAL PARK LOT 1 LESS ORDER OF TAKING 04- 3779 DESC IN OR 3697 PG 260 64280000400NAPLES COMMUNITY HOSPITAL INC PO BOX 413029NAPLES, FL 34101---3029 NORTH NAPLES MEDICAL PARK LOT 664280000507NATIONWIDE HLTH PROPERTIES INC % ALTUS GROUP US INC 21001 N TATUM BLVD #1630-630PHOENIX, AZ 85050---0 SOUTHWEST PROFESSIONAL HEALTH PARK TRACT B374445101105NCHMD INC350 7TH STREET NNAPLES, FL 34102---0 NORTH NAPLES MEDICAL PARK LOTS 4 AND 564280000468Notice: This data belongs to the Collier County Property Appraiser's Office (CCPA). Therefore, the recipient agrees not to represent this data to anyone as other than CCPA provided data. The recipient may not transfer this data to others without consent from the CCPA.Petition: PL20190002849(GMPA) & PL20190002850(PUDA) | Buffer: 500' | Date: 11/3/2020 | Site Location: Creekside Commerce Park CPUDPOList_500_PL20190002849-PL20190002850.xls9.A.4.dPacket Pg. 1330Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 2NEWTON JR, ROBERT D & KIM M 1330 REMINGTON WAY #11101NAPLES, FL 34110---0 REMINGTON RESERVE A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 110169229000822NMP OF NAPLES LLC 1890 SW HEALTH PKWY STE 100NAPLES, FL 34109---473 GULFCOAST MEDICAL ARTS CENTER A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 1-E48501000095NORTH NAPLES MEDICAL PARK OWNERS ASSOCIATION PO BOX 413029NAPLES, FL 34101---3029 NORTH NAPLES MEDICAL PARK TRACT R64280000387NORTH NAPLES MEDICAL PARK OWNERS ASSOCIATION INC PO BOX 413029NAPLES, FL 34101---3029 NORTH NAPLES MEDICAL PARK TRACT P-164280000060NORTH NAPLES MEDICAL PARK OWNERS ASSOCIATION INC PO BOX 413029NAPLES, FL 34101---3029 NORTH NAPLES MEDICAL PARK TRACT P-264280000361NOVAK, MICHAEL A & BRIDGETTE A 1660 MEDICAL BLVD STE 200NAPLES, FL 34110---1416 ROYAL PALM BUILDING A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 20071360000067NOVAK, MICHAEL A & BRIDGETTE A 1660 MEDICAL BLVD STE 200NAPLES, FL 34110---1416 ROYAL PALM BUILDING A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 20171360000083OLSON, JAY & KATHLYN 1335 REMINGTON WAY APT 3201NAPLES, FL 34110---937 REMINGTON RESERVE A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 30369229000220PALM 100 LLC 1660 MEDICAL BLVD SUITE 100NAPLES, FL 34110---0 ROYAL PALM BUILDING A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 10071360000025PGA FAMILY REALTY LLC 408 COLLEGE AVENUE SUITE #1ITHACA, NY 14850---0 COLLIER HEALTH PARK CONDOMINIUM A COMMERCIAL LAND CONDOMINIUM UNIT 3 27167400063PGA FAMILY REALTY LLC 408 COLLEGE AVENUE SUITE #1ITHACA, NY 14850---0 COLLIER HEALTH PARK CONDOMINIUM A COMMERCIAL LAND CONDOMINIUM UNIT 4 27167400089PIKE, JOSEPH D & CHAN POYNER 9663 MASHIE COURTNAPLES, FL 34108---1997 MASHIE COURT AT THE ESTATES AT BAY COLONY GOLF CLUB LOT 56 AND LOT 57 59934000088PLAYTPUS PROPERTIES SUB IV LLC 11623 USEPPA CTNAPLES, FL 34110---0 REMINGTON RESERVE A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 20269229000123POTIER, MICHEL & PATRICIA 1325 REMINGTON WAY APT 2202NAPLES, FL 34110---934 REMINGTON RESERVE A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 20469229000165PRATT, KRISTIN LEIGH 1365 REMINGTON WAY #6101NAPLES, FL 34110---0 REMINGTON RESERVE A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 60169229000424QUATRO LLC 363 NEPTUNES BIGHTNAPLES, FL 34103---0 REMINGTON RESERVE A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 80369229000628QUILLIN TR, ANDREW D MICHELLE C QUILLIN TR4635 ABERDEEN AVEDUBLIN, OH 43016---9529 REMINGTON RESERVE A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 30469229000246RANI INVESTMENTS LLC 425 DOCKSIDE DR # 602NAPLES, FL 34110---0 CREEKSIDE COMMERCE PARK WEST UNIT ONE LOT 3, LESS OR 3662 PG 1812, LESS E 32.84FT OF LOT 3 29331190725RES FLORIDA 1250 HOLDINGS LLC 1265 CREEKSIDE PARKWAY SUITE 210NAPLES, FL 34108---0 CREEKSIDE COMMERCE PARK LOT 429331194022RES FLORIDA 1250 HOLDINGS LLC 1265 CREEKSIDE PKWY STE 210NAPLES, FL 34108---0 CREEKSIDE COMMERCE PARK WEST UNIT TWO TRACT O229331193049RES FLORIDA 1255 HOLDINGS LLC % JOHN SCHMIEDING 1370 CREEKSIDE BLVDNAPLES, FL 34108---1945 CREEKSIDE COMMERCE PARK WEST UNIT ONE LOT 1 LESS OR 3661 PG 2083 29331190686RES FLORIDA 1265 HOLDINGS, LLC 1370 CREEKSIDE BLVDNAPLES, FL 34108---0 CREEKSIDE COMMERCE PARK WEST UNIT TWO LOT 14 AND 15 AND THAT PART OF TR R AS DESC IN OR 3926 PG 2925 (RES 06-73) 29331193243RES FLORIDA 1284 HOLDING LLC 1370 CREEKSIDE BLVDNAPLES, FL 34108---0 CREEKSIDE COMMERCE PARK WEST UNIT TWO LOT 13 AND THAT PART OF LOT 12 FURTHER DESC AS: BEG AT THE NE CNR OF LOT 13, RUN S29331193227RES FLORIDA 1336 HOLDINGS LLC 1370 CREEKSIDE BLVDNAPLES, FL 34108---0 CREEKSIDE FLEX I A COMMERCIAL LAND CONDOMINIUM UNIT 229334000045RES FLORIDA 1370 HOLDINGS LLC 1370 CREEKSIDE BLVDNAPLES, FL 34108---0 ARTHREX AT CREEKSIDE-TRACT"A" TRACT A22435011024RES FLORIDA 1370 HOLDINGS LLC 1370 CREEKSIDE BLVDNAPLES, FL 34108---1945 CREEKSIDE COMMERCE PARK WEST UNIT TWO LOT 6, LESS ARTHREX AT CREEK SIDE TRACT A29331193081RES FLORIDA 1370 HOLDINGS LLC 1370 CREEKSIDE BLVDNAPLES, FL 34108---1945 CREEKSIDE COMMERCE PARK WEST UNIT TWO LOT 729331193104RES FLORIDA 1370 HOLDINGS LLC 1370 CREEKSIDE BLVDNAPLES, FL 34108---1945 CREEKSIDE COMMERCE PARK WEST UNIT TWO LOT 829331193120RES FLORIDA 1370 HOLDINGS LLC 1370 CREEKSIDE BLVDNAPLES, FL 34108---1945 CREEKSIDE COMMERCE PARK WEST UNIT TWO LOT 9, LESS THAT PART OF 9 NKA CREEKSIDE FLEX I COMMERCIAL LAND CONDO AS DESC29331193146RES FLORIDA 1370 HOLDINGS LLC 1370 CREEKSIDE BLVDNAPLES, FL 34108---1945 CREEKSIDE FLEX I A COMMERCIAL LAND CONDOMINIUM UNIT 129334000029RIVERCHASE COMMONS OWNERS ASSOCIATION INC PO BOX 8537NAPLES, FL 34101---8537 RIVERCHASE COMMONS TRACT J69586500065S J M J LIMITED PARTNERSHIP 1901 WISHWOOD DR PO BOX 1423WASHINGTON, MO 63090---0 GULFCOAST MEDICAL ARTS CENTER A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 2-C48501000147SARGENT, J. CAROLYN 1345 REMINGTON WAY #4101NAPLES, FL 34110---0 REMINGTON RESERVE A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 40169229000262SCHAFER, HENRY W & JUDITH M 18049 S SHORE LN WEDEN PRAIRIE, MN 55346---3412 REMINGTON RESERVE A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 30169229000181SCRIPPS NP OPERATING LLC % GANNETT TAX DEPT 7950 JONES BRANCH DRMCLEAN, VA 22102---0 27 48 25 COMM NW CNR SEC 27, S 125.02FT, N 44DEG E 34.99FT, S 89DEG E 573.45FT, S 89DEG E 500.61FT, S 89DEG E 768.26FT, 00168048001SCRIPPS NP OPERATING LLC %INTERNATIONAL APPRAISAL110 PLEASANT AVEUPPER SADDLE RIV, NJ 07458---0 27 48 25 FROM NW CNR SEC 27, S125.02 FT, N 45 DEG E 35.08FT, S 89 DEG E 573.46 FT, S 86 DEG E 500.61 FT, S 89 DEG E 147.09 00168040601SINGER, MARK A 5550 HERON POINT DRNAPLES, FL 34108---2868 GULFCOAST MEDICAL ARTS CENTER A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 1-D48501000082SMARG, RICHARD M 1185 IMMOKALEE RD STE 120NAPLES, FL 34110---4806 CITIZENS NATIONAL BANK CENTER A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 12026090000065SNIDER, MARY JOYCE RHONDA COODY KATZMAN 1385 REMINGTON CT #8102NAPLES, FL 34110---0 REMINGTON RESERVE A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 80269229000602SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WOMEN'S GROUP AND BUILDING CO LLC 1890 SW HEALTH PKWY STE 303NAPLES, FL 34109---473 GULFCOAST MEDICAL ARTS CENTER A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 3-B48501000202SOUTHWEST FLORIDA WOMEN'S GROUP BUILDING CO LLC 1890 SW HEALTH PKWY STE 303NAPLES, FL 34109---473 GULFCOAST MEDICAL ARTS CENTER A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 3-C48501000228STELZER, JOHN A & CHRISTINE J 4 ALEXANDER CTBAYPORT, NY 11705---0 REMINGTON RESERVE A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 110369229000864SW FLA WOMENS GROUP COM LLC 1890 SW HEALTH PKWY STE 303NAPLES, FL 34109---473 GULFCOAST MEDICAL ARTS CENTER A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 3-E48501000260SWAMP LLC 3860 PEMBROOKE LANEVESTAL, NY 13850---0 REMINGTON RESERVE A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 110469229000880TORRENS LLC 1890 SW HEALTH PKWY #302NAPLES, FL 34109---0 GULFCOAST MEDICAL ARTS CENTER A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 3-D48501000244TRAIL BOULEVARD LLLP %PARADIGM TAX- ESS #1638 PO BOX 800729DALLAS, TX 75380---0 27 48 25 THAT PORTION LYING S OF IMMOKALEE RD AND ELY OF GOODLETTE FRANK RD AS FURTHER DESC IN OR 4522 PG 381 00168040106TRAIL BOULEVARD LLLP %PARADIGM TAX- ESS #1638 PO BOX 800729DALLAS, TX 75380---0 27 48 25 COMM AT NE CNR SEC 27 S01DEG 09'43"E 1314.62FT, S89 DEG 48'50'W 677.35FT, S05DEG 35'39"E 229.90FT TO POB, S05 00168042706TRONCO, FERNANDO & MICHELA 1315 REMINGTON WAY APT 1101NAPLES, FL 34110---932 REMINGTON RESERVE A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 10369229000068TRONCO, FERNANDO & MICHELA 4N025 WOOD DALE RDADDISON, IL 60101---2963 REMINGTON RESERVE A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 10169229000026TURICCHI, THOMAS E & LEE A 1320 REMINGTON WAY #12201NAPLES, FL 34110---0 REMINGTON RESERVE A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 120369229000945UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE 4000 DEKALB TECHNOLOGY PKWY STE 300ATLANTA, GA 30340---2761 CREEKSIDE COMMERCE PARK WEST UNIT ONE LOT 529331190848VOTH, PETER H & JEANNETTE A 1365 REMINGTON WAY #6202NAPLES, FL 34110---941 REMINGTON RESERVE A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 60469229000482WHITE OAKS REAL ESTATE INVESTMENTS OF SW FL LLC 1285 CREEKSIDE BLVD ENAPLES, FL 34109---0 CREEKSIDE COMMERCE PARK EAST,PART OF TR 5 DESC AS FOLL; COM AT NE CNR 27-48-25 ALG E LI S01 09 43E 696.85FT, THENCE 29331180612ZAPFEL, RICHARD JOHN 1220 POCANTICO LNNAPLES, FL 34110---923 REMINGTON RESERVE A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 120469229000961REFERENCE ONLY CITIZENS NATIONAL BANK CENTER A CONDOMINIUMRIVERCHASE COMMONS LOT 10 AND 11 NKA CITIZENS NATIONAL BANK CENTER CONDO AS DESC IN OR 3134 PG 1379 69586500447REFERENCE ONLY COLLIER HEALTH PARK CONDOMINIUM A COMMERCIAL LAND CONDOMINIUMCOLLIER HEALTH PARK, THAT PORTION OF TRACT B AS DESC IN OR 5244 PG 1526 NKA COLLIER HEALTH PARK CONDO- 27167500206REFERENCE ONLY CREEKSIDE CORNERS CONDOMINIUM A COMMERCIAL LAND CONDOMINIUMCREEKSIDE COMMERCE PARK EAST, THAT PART OF TRACT 5 NKA CREEKSIDE CORNERS CONDO, A COMMERCIAL LAND29331180625REFERENCE ONLY CREEKSIDE EAST LAND CONDOMINIUMCREEKSIDE COMMERCE PARK EAST THAT PORTION OF TRACT 3 NKA CREEKSIDE EAST LAND CONDO AS DESC IN OR 5057 PG 2811 29331180104REFERENCE ONLY CREEKSIDE FLEX I A COMMERCIAL LAND CONDOMINIUMCREEKSIDE COMMERCE PARK WEST UNIT TWO LOT 10 AND A PORTION OF LOT 9 NKS CREEKSIDE FLEX I COMMERCIAL LAND CONDO AS DESC29331193162REFERENCE ONLY GULFCOAST MEDICAL ARTS CENTER A CONDOMINIUMSOUTHWEST PROFESSIONAL HEALTH PARK TRACT B4 NKA GULFCOAST MEDICAL ARTS CENTER CONDO AS DESC IN OR 2644 PG 551 & OR 74445101309REFERENCE ONLY NOW SEE PELICAN MARSH GOLF COURSE PH TWO TR GC1 PAR 1 FOLIO# 66679351250BENTGRASS BEND AT THE ESTATES AT BAY COLONY GOLF CLUB TRACT B23932000045REFERENCE ONLY NOW SEE PELICAN MARSH GOLF COURSE PH TWO TR GC1 PAR 1 FOLIO# 66679351250PELICAN MARSH GOLF COURSE PHASE THREE TRACT 3, LESS THAT PORTION DESC IN OR 2139 PG 646 66679360759REFERENCE ONLY NOW SEE PELICAN MARSH GOLF COURSE PH TWO TRACT GC-1 PCL 1 FOLIO 66679351250PELICAN MARSH GOLF COURSE PHASE THREE TRACT GC1 B66679361363REFERENCE ONLY NOW SEE PELICAN MARSH GOLF COURSE PH TWO TRACT GC-1 PCL-1 FOLIO# 66679351250PELICAN MARSH GOLF COURSE PHASE THREE THAT PORTION OF TR GC1 AS DESC IN OR 2147 PG 712 (PORTION OF BAY COLONY GOLF 66679361321REFERENCE ONLY REMINGTON RESERVE A CONDOMINIUMCOLLIER'S RESERVE THAT PORTION OF TR "I" NKA REMINGTON RESERVE CONDO (PH 1) AS DESC IN OR 4093 PG 1474 AS 27185002605REFERENCE ONLY ROYAL PALM BUILDING A CONDOMINIUMNORTH NAPLES MEDICAL PARK LOT 8 & 9 N/K/A ROYAL PALM BUILDING CONDO AS DESC IN OR 2396 PG 2708 64280000549REFERENCE ONLY RUBELL MEDICAL CENTER CONDO A COMMERCIAL LAND CONDOMINIUMSOUTHWEST PROFESSIONAL HEALTH PARK TRACT B2, NKA RUBELL MEDICAL CENTER CONDOMINIUM A COMMERCIAL LAND CONDOMINIUM 74445101008BERECZKI, CSABA F 16 SONNY STMAPLE L6A 1C1 CANADA REMINGTON RESERVE A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 90269229000686SCOFIELD, GRAHAM PATRICIA ANN SCOFIELD 2 STRATHMORE HOUSE 11 QUEEN MOTHER SQUARE POUNDBURY, DORSE DT13DX UNITED KINGDOM REMINGTON RESERVE A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 90169229000660SIEKIERSKI, WILLIAM 104 - 11 DURHAM PRIVATEOTTAWA K1M 2H6 CANADA REMINGTON RESERVE A CONDOMINIUM UNIT 110269229000848PELICAN MARSH FOUNDATION1504 PELICAN MARSH BOULEVARDNAPLES, FL 34109REMINGTON RESERVE CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC. 3050 N. HORSESHOE DR. STE. 172NAPLES, FL 34104POList_500_PL20190002849-PL20190002850.xls9.A.4.dPacket Pg. 1331Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 12A |THURSDAY, DECEMBER 17, 2020 |NAPLES DAILY NEWS + *Financing with approved credit.Interest accrues at time of purchase unless paid in full during promotional period.For regular term purchases,APR is based on US prime rate and is subject to change.Monthly payments required. FUN FA CT:FUN FA CT: Po wer failurePowerfailure is notisnot caused by forgetting Santa’sSanta’s Cookies ONLYONLY KEEP THEKEEPTHE LIGHTSLIGHTS ONON WITHWITH GENERACGENERAC AUTOMATIC STANDBY GENERATOR AIR CONDITIONING ELECTRICAL PLUMBING DRAINS forfor CC NONO manual starts |extension cords |gas can refilling |noisy machines |deadly fumes A Generac®automatic standby home generator can keep you comfortable during unexpected power interruptions.The generator provides hands-free operation that automatically starts within seconds of a power outage,and turns off when utility power returns,so there is no need to monitor the unit during an outage.These machines are compatible for use with the sensitive home electronics and appliances. If your family relies on continuous electrical power for critical medical equipment,standby generators are literally life-savers. 24/7 EMERGENCY SERVICE NO OVERTIME CHARGES! Call us today to schedule your service! 239-558-1895 NAPLES FT.MYERS BONITA SPRINGS CAPE CORAL ESTERO MARCO ISLAND Coupon must be presented at time of purchase.Prices vary by model.All prices are final at point of sale. All sales are final.Cannot be combined with any other offers or promotions. EXPIRES DECEMBER 31,2020 Coupon must be presented at time of purchase.Prices vary by model.All prices are final at point of sale. All sales are final.Cannot be combined with any other offers or promotions. EXPIRES DECEMBER 31,2020 ND-GCI0542407-02 NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING Petitions PL20190002849 Creekside Commerce Park East Mixed Use Subdistrict (GMPA)and PL20190002850,Creekside Commerce Park PUD Amendment (PUDA) A Neighborhood Information Meeting hosted by D.Wa yne Arnold,AICP, of Q.Grady Minor and Associates,P.A.and Richard D.Yo vanovich,Esq. of Coleman,Yo vanovich &Koester,P.A.,representing Creekside East,Inc. (Applicant)will be held on Wednesday,January 6,2021,5:30 pm at Saint Monica’s Episcopal Church,7070 Immokalee Road,Naples,FL 34119. Individuals who would like to participate remotely or have questions or comments should contact Sharon Umpenhour,Senior Planning Te chnician with Q.Grady Minor &Associates,P.A.by email:sumpenhour@gradyminor. com,phone:239-947-1144,or mail:3800 Via Del Rey,Bonita Springs, FL 34134.Project information is posted online at www.gradyminor.com/ planning. Creekside East,Inc.has submitted formal applications to Collier County, seeking approval of a Small-Scale Growth Management Plan (GMP) Amendment and a Planned Unit Development (PUD)Amendment.The GMP amendment proposes to revise the Future Land Use Element to create the Creekside Commerce Park East Mixed Use Subdistrict.The plan amendment establishes a maximum of 300 multi-family rental units to be constructed in the 9.9±acre subdistrict,which will be located on the east side Goodlette- Frank Road within the ‘B’District of the Creekside Commerce Park PUD. The companion PUD amendment proposes to amend the Creekside Commerce Park PUD to construct a maximum of 300 multi-family dwelling units east of Goodlette-Frank Road as a development option.The addition of the residential use is to the ‘B’District within the PUD.The maximum vehicular trip generation figure in Section 2.16.L has not been revised with the addition of the multi-family residential use because the PUD proposes no change to the previously established trip cap.The Conceptual PUD Master Plan has been modified to show the Creekside Commerce Park East Mixed Use Subdistrict located east of Goodlette-Frank Road. The GMP amendment subject property is comprised of approximately 9.9± acres,located within the Creekside Commerce Park PUD east of Goodlette- Frank Road.The Creekside Commerce Park PUD is comprised of 106± acres,located on the southwest and southeast quadrant of Immokalee Road and Goodlette-Frank Road in Section 27,To wnship 48 South,Range 25 East,Collier County,Florida. The Neighborhood Information Meeting is for informational purposes,it is not a public hearing. Man guilty of pretending to be immigration attorney TAMPA – A Florida man has been convicted of pretending to be an attor- ney and filing hundreds of fake immi- gration applications. Elvis Harold Reyes, 56, pleaded guilty Tuesday in Tampa federal court to mail fraud and aggravated identity theft, ac- cording to court records. He faces up to 20 years in prison for the mail fraud and a mandatory consecutive 2 years for the identity theft. A sentencing date hasn’t been set. According to court documents, Reyes owned and operated EHR Ministries Inc. He portrayed himself as an immi- gration attorney, though he has never had a law license. Florida man is bitten by shark, walks home bleeding SIESTA KEY – A Florida man was bit- ten by a shark and walked home bleed- ing where a woman called 911 and had him taken to a hospital. News outlets reported the man was swimming in the waters off Siesta Key when the attack happened. WTVT reported a woman called 911 and said the 39-year-old man had been bitten on his hand and arm and was bleeding profusely. She was heard reas- suring him “everything’s going to be OK.” Sarasota Memorial Hospital spokes- man Kim Savage said a man had been admitted Tuesday and the wound was confirmed to have been a shark bite, but she said she could not provide any more details on his condition or personal in- formation. Man sentenced to 50 years for stabbing mom to death PALM COAST – A Florida man was sentenced to 50 years in prison Wednesday for stabbing his mother to death after he got angry when she threatened to kick him out of the house. Nathaniel Shimmel, 25, pleaded guilty to second-degree murder Wednesday after facing a first-degree murder charge and the possibility of life in prison. On Aug. 23, 2017, Shimmel called 911 and initially said a robber had attacked her, but later confessed to the crime de- scribing the events in vivid detail. Associated Press STATE BRIEFS TALLAHASSEE – Red tide is back in the waters off of Florida’s southwest coast, making birds sick and killing fish, according to a state environmental agency update on Wednesday. While satellite imagery isn’t picking up the toxic algal blooms, the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Com- mission said it’s been detected in the waters between Sanibel Island and Marco Island. Officials said recent tests that were done on sea birds alerted officials. “Our first indication of this particular event was we had over a dozen cormo- rants that came into a wildlife rehab center on Sanibel and we tested blood from those cormorants and all of them tested positive for the red tide toxin,” Gil McRae, director of the agency’s Fish and Wildlife Research Institute, told com- mission members during a virtual meet- ing. McRae said it was a late season bloom, and that winter weather could likely break it up, but in the meantime the state, local governments and volun- teers are trying to identify what areas are being affected. “We are ramping up every available resource to respond to this red tide,” McRae said. “As of right now it doesn’t appear to be nearly as large scale as the ones we’ve seen in the recent past.” The toxic bloom overran Florida’s southern Gulf Coast in 2018, killing huge numbers of fish along with scores of sea turtles and the state’s beloved mana- tees. The bloom also causes respiratory irritations in people which, coupled with the stench of rotting marine life, sent many tourists fleeing beaches, sea- side attractions and nearby restaurants. Red tide is caused by an organism called Karenia brevis, which occurs nat- urally in the waters off Florida. In an av- erage year, a red tide may bloom in the fall and run its course through the win- ter months. Red tide found off state’ssouthwest coast; birds sick Brendan Farrington ASSOCIATED PRESS 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1332 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) Transcript - PL20190002849 Creekside Commerce Park East Mixed Use Subdistrict (GMPA) and PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUD Amendment (PUDA) January 6, 2021 NIM Page 1 of 1 The meeting was scheduled for Wednesday, January 6, 2021, 5:30 pm at Saint Monica’s Episcopal Church, 7070 Immokalee Road, Naples, FL 34119. No members of the public were present or registered through Zoom, therefore the meeting was not held. 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1333 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.d Packet Pg. 1334 Attachment: Attachment C-Application (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 9.A.4.ePacket Pg. 1335Attachment: CCPC-BCC Hybrid Meeting Waiver (19875 : PL20190002850, Creekside Commerce Park PUDA) 09/16/2021 COLLIER COUNTY Collier County Planning Commission Item Number: 9.A.5 Item Summary: PL20190001333 GMPA Iglesias Pentecostes Peniel - An Ordinance of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida amending Ordinance No. 89-05, as amended, the Collier County Growth Management Plan for the unincorporated area of Collier County, Florida, specifically amending the Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan Element and Rural Golden Gate Estates Future Land Use Map and Map Series; by amending the Estates- Mixed Use District to add the 8th Street NE-22nd Avenue NE Subdistrict to allow a 100-seat church as a conditional use. The subject property consists of 5.15± acres and is located on the northwest corner of 8th Street NE and 22nd Avenue NE in Section 27, Township 48 South, Range 27 East, Collier County, Florida; and furthermore, directing transmittal of the adopted amendment to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity; providing for severability and providing for an effective date. (Companion Item PL20190001326 CU) [Coordinator: Sue Faulkner, Principal Planner] Meeting Date: 09/16/2021 Prepared by: Title: Planner, Principal – Zoning Name: Sue Faulkner 09/02/2021 5:03 PM Submitted by: Title: – Zoning Name: Mike Bosi 09/02/2021 5:03 PM Approved By: Review: Planning Commission Diane Lynch Review item Completed 09/03/2021 3:26 PM Growth Management Operations & Regulatory Management Donna Guitard Review Item Completed 09/07/2021 10:06 AM Zoning Diane Lynch Additional Reviewer Skipped 09/07/2021 9:09 AM Zoning Mike Bosi Zoning Director Review Completed 09/07/2021 11:41 AM Growth Management Department James C French GMD Deputy Dept Head Completed 09/07/2021 1:55 PM Planning Commission Edwin Fryer Meeting Pending 09/16/2021 9:00 AM 9.A.5 Packet Pg. 1336 Page | 1 of 13 STAFF REPORT TO: COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT/ZONING DIVISION, COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING SECTION HEARING DATE: September 16, 2021 RE: PETITION PL20190001333/CPSS-2019-11, SMALL-SCALE GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN AMENDMENT (Companion to PUDA- PL20190001326) [ADOPTION HEARING] ELEMENT: RURAL GOLDEN GATE ESTATES SUB-ELEMENT OF THE GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN (GGAMP) AGENT/APPLICANT/OWNER(S): Agent: Ronny De Aza, PE, RDA Consulting Engineers, LLC 800 Harbour Drive, Suite #2C, Naples, FL 34103 Applicants: Iglesia Pentecostes Penial, Inc. 757 107th Ave North Naples, FL 34108 Owners: Iglesia Pentecostes Penial, Inc. 757 107th Ave North Naples, FL 34108 GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The subject property comprises ±5.15-acres and is located in the northwest quadrant of 8th Street NE and 22nd Ave NE, approximately 0.51 miles south of Randall Blvd. in Section 27, Township 48 South, Range 27 East (Rural Estates Planning Community). 9.A.5.a Packet Pg. 1337 Attachment: Staff Report CPSS-2019-11 IPP Church (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) Page | 2 of 13 REQUESTED ACTION: The applicant requests to amend the Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan (GGAMP) and the Rural Golden Gate Estates Future Land Use Map and Map Series to create the 8th Street NE- 22nd Avenue NE Subdistrict, which consists of two parcels (37750560106 and 37750560009) totaling ±5.15 acres. The purpose of this Subdistrict is to allow a 100-seat church as a conditional use. 9.A.5.a Packet Pg. 1338 Attachment: Staff Report CPSS-2019-11 IPP Church (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) Page | 3 of 13 The proposed amended Golden Gate Area Master Plan, Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub Element text is as follows: (Single underline text is added, single strike-through text is deleted, and is also reflected in the Ordinance Exhibit A). GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN RURAL GOLDEN GATE ESTATES SUB-ELEMENT *** *** *** *** *** Text break *** *** *** *** *** TABLE OF CONTENTS Page A. Goals, Objectives and Policies 1 B. Land Use Designation Description Section 9 1. ESTATES DESIGNATION [Beginning page 9] A. Estates – Mixed Use District 1. Residential Estates Subdistrict 2. Neighborhood Center Subdistrict 3. Conditional Uses Subdistrict 4. Mission Subdistrict 5. Everglades – Randall Subdistrict 6. 8th Street NE – 22nd Avenue NE Subdistrict 16 B. Estates - Commercial District [Beginning page 17] *** *** *** *** *** Text break *** *** *** *** *** 2. AGRICULTURE/RURAL DESIGNATION 27 *** *** *** *** *** Text break *** *** *** *** *** 3. OVERLAYS AND SPECIAL FEATURES 27 *** *** *** *** *** Text break *** *** *** *** *** C. List of Maps 28 Rural Golden Gate Estates Future Land Use Map Golden Gate Estates Neighborhood Centers Wilson Boulevard/Golden Gate Boulevard Neighborhood Center Golden Gate Boulevard/Everglades Boulevard Neighborhood Center Immokalee Road/Everglades Boulevard Neighborhood Center Randall Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict Mission Subdistrict Estates Shopping Center Subdistrict Estates Shopping Center Subdistrict Conceptual Plan 9.A.5.a Packet Pg. 1339 Attachment: Staff Report CPSS-2019-11 IPP Church (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) Page | 4 of 13 Everglades – Randall Subdistrict Immokalee Road/Randall Boulevard Planning Study Area 8th Street NE – 22nd Avenue NE Subdistrict *** *** *** *** *** Text break *** *** *** *** *** A. GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES *** *** *** *** *** Text break *** *** *** *** *** Policy 1.1.4: The ESTATES Future Land Use Designation shall include Future Land Use Districts and Subdistricts for: A. ESTATES – MIXED USE DISTRICT 1. Residential Estates Subdistrict 2. Neighborhood Center Subdistrict 3. Conditional Uses Subdistrict 4. Mission Subdistrict 5. Everglades – Randall Subdistrict 6. 8th Street NE – 22nd Avenue NE Subdistrict B. ESTATES – COMMERCIAL DISTRICT *** *** *** *** *** Text break *** *** *** *** *** B. LAND USE DESIGNATION DESCRIPTION SECTION *** *** *** *** *** Text break *** *** *** *** *** 1. ESTATES DESIGNATION *** *** *** *** *** Text break *** *** *** *** *** A. Estates – Mixed Use District 1. Residential Estates Subdistrict *** *** *** *** *** Text break *** *** *** *** *** 6. 8th Street NE – 22nd Avenue NE Subdistrict [Beginning Page 16] The 8th Street NE – 22nd Avenue NE Subdistrict is located on the northwest corner of 8th Street NE and 22nd Avenue NE, consists of 5.15 acres, and comprises Golden Gate Estates Unit 23 TR 133, less E 350 ft and Golden Gate Est Unit 23 E 350 ft of TR 133. The purpose of this Subdistrict is to provide for churches and other places of worship and their related uses. The following use is permitted within the Subdistrict through the conditional use process: a. Churches and other places of worship The following church-related uses are prohibited within the Subdistrict: a. Day care centers 9.A.5.a Packet Pg. 1340 Attachment: Staff Report CPSS-2019-11 IPP Church (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) Page | 5 of 13 b. Private schools c. Soup kitchens d. Homeless shelters The maximum total floor area allowed in this Subdistrict is 5,000 square feet, including no more than 100 seats. The maximum height of buildings shall be 30 feet. Architectural features such as steeples may be a maximum height of 50 feet. The project will provide an enhanced landscape buffer in lieu of a masonry wall required between the adjacent residential properties and the subject property by Section 5.03.02.H.1.a. of the Land Development Code. To the north and the west, the enhanced landscape buffer will be provided with supplemental plantings within the 75’ native vegetation buffer. *** *** *** *** *** Text break *** *** *** *** *** C. List of Maps Rural Golden Gate Estates Future Land Use Map *** *** *** *** *** Text break *** *** *** *** *** Everglades – Randall Subdistrict Immokalee Road/Randall Boulevard Planning Study Area 8th Street NE – 22nd Avenue NE Subdistrict PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The purpose of this small-scale Growth Management Plan Amendment is to create the 8th Street NE – 22nd Avenue NE Subdistrict, which consists of ±5.15 acres in the northwest quadrant of the intersection of 8th St. NE and 22nd Avenue NE. The subject site is currently undeveloped and uncleared. The purpose of this proposed Subdistrict is to allow a 100-seat church as a conditional use. The applicant also proposes to amend the “Rural Golden Gate Estates Future Land Use Map” and create the “8th Street NE – 22nd Avenue NE Subdistrict” map. SURROUNDING LAND USE, ZONING AND FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION: Subject Property: The subject property is approximately ±5.15 acres and uncleared and undeveloped. The GGAMP designation is Estates, Estates - Mixed Use District, Residential Estates Subdistrict as identified on the Rural Golden Gate Estates Future Land Use Map. The subject site is approximately 0.5 miles south of Randall Blvd. Surrounding Land Uses: North: Immediately abutting the north boundary of the subject property is a single family residential dwelling unit on a 2.5-acre parcel. The GGAMP designates the subject site: Estates Designation, Estates Mixed Use District, Residential Estates Subdistrict; and zoned Estates Zoning District. Further to the north are additional single-family residences that are also 2.5 acres or greater per each parcel that the GGAMP designated: Estates Designation, Estates Mixed Use District, Residential Estates Subdistrict; and zoned Estates Zoning District. 9.A.5.a Packet Pg. 1341 Attachment: Staff Report CPSS-2019-11 IPP Church (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) Page | 6 of 13 East: Immediately adjacent to the east lies 8th Street NE. Across 8th Street NE are a couple of +/-2.5-acre lots with agricultural uses such as poultry, bees, tropical fish, and rabbits, etc. The area further to the east are residential properties – single family homes and vacant residential on small parcels of approximately 1 acre. The GGAMP designated properties to the east: Estates Designation, Estates Mixed Use District, Residential Estates Subdistrict; and zoned Estates Zoning District. South: Immediately to the south is 22nd Avenue NE. The land directly across 22nd Avenue NE from the subject site is an undeveloped residential property and the GGAMP designated: Estates Designation, Estates Mixed Use District, Residential Estates Subdistrict; and zoned Estates Zoning District. Further to the south residential parcels designated and zoned the same as to the north. West: Immediately adjacent to the west of the subject site is a 2.5-acre single family residential parcel that the GGAMP designated: Estates Designation, Estates Mixed Use District, Residential Estates Subdistrict; and zoned Estates Zoning District. Further to the west it is developed with single family residential and undeveloped properties. STAFF ANALYSIS: Background and Considerations: The subject site is currently a heavily wooded, undeveloped 5.15 acres designated: Estates Designation, Estates Mixed Use District, Residential Estates Subdistrict; and zoned Estates Zoning District. The church purchased the proposed location at the northwest quadrant of the intersection of 8th Street NE and 22nd Avenue NE in March 2019. The applicant presented several reasons for wanting to locate the church at this spot: 1. Location is centrally located for the existing church congregation. See map “Adjacent Congressional Members within 2 Miles.” 2. Easily accessible location. 8th Street NE (listed as collector in Functional Classification) connects two east-west collectors from Randall Blvd. (TR3.2 in FLUE, FDOT Functional classification listed as other freeways and expressways) to Golden Gate Blvd. (TR3.2 in FLUE, FDOT Functional classification listed as major collector). 3. Property is in close proximity to the current church location at 13260 Immokalee Rd, Suite #7 – approximately 1.2 miles from proposed location. 9.A.5.a Packet Pg. 1342 Attachment: Staff Report CPSS-2019-11 IPP Church (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) Page | 7 of 13 The Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element on page 13, #3. Conditional Uses Subdistrict, states, “Various types of conditional uses are permitted in the Estates zoning district within the Rural Golden Gate Estates area. In order to control the location and spacing of new conditional uses, one of the following four sets of criteria shall be met: a. Essential Services Conditional Use Provisions b. Neighborhood Center Transitional Conditional Use Provisions c. Transitional Conditional Uses d. Special Exceptions to Conditional Use Locational Criteria 1. Temporary use permits for model homes 2. Conditional Use permits for excavation 3. Conditional Use for a church or place of worship is allowed on Tract 22, Golden Gate Estates, Unit 97 (see Special Exception to Conditional Use Location Criteria Map). 4. Conditional Use for a cellular tower be allowed in the Estates Zoning District only on parcels no smaller than 2.25 acres and adjacent to a roadway classified within the Transportation Element as a Collector or Arterial.” This project falls under the idea of the Special Exception to Conditional Use. The Special Exception to Conditional Use Locational Criteria Map currently shows two approved locations in the Urban Golden Gate Estates, not the Rural Golden Gate Estates: #3 mentions Tract 22, Unit 97, which is located on Immokalee Road just east of I-75 and the other location shown on the Special Exception to Conditional Use Location Criteria Map is Tract 107, Unit 30, which is located on the west side of Santa Barbara Blvd. just north of Painted Leaf Lane. Since neither of these locations are in the Rural Golden Gate Estates , the applicant is proposing to create a new subdistrict in the Rural Golden Gate Estates under the Estates Mixed Use District. Previously, the Mission Subdistrict was approved and handled very similarly with among other conditional uses a church use located at the intersection of Oil Well Road and Everglades Blvd. in the Rural Golden Gate Estates. Proposed location 9.A.5.a Packet Pg. 1343 Attachment: Staff Report CPSS-2019-11 IPP Church (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) Page | 8 of 13 The applicant, Iglesias Pentecostes Peniel Church (a non-denominational church) is proposing just one use with their Conditional Use application: Churches and other places of worship. Currently, the Iglesias Pentecostes Peniel Church with its approximately 60 members meets in a storefront that used to be a florist tucked in the strip shopping center located just south of the intersection of Randall Blvd. and Immokalee Rd. The strip Shopping Center near Randall Blvd. includes L’Appetito, a hair salon, Armando’s Supermarket, Amigo’s Truck Parts and Tire Repairs and more stores. The church currently meets in a small storefront within this group of shops. The Rural Golden Gate Estates SubElement states, “The Rural Golden Gate Estates is rural in character and is defined by large, wooded lots, the keeping of livestock, the ability to grow crops, wildlife activity, environmental stewardship, low-density residential development, and limitations on commercial and conditional uses.” Keeping in mind the rural character of the Rural Golden Gate Estates, the Iglesias Pentecostes Peniel Church has proposed a conditional use for a very small church to be located on two parcels totaling approximately 5.15-acres on the Northwest quadrant at the intersection of 8th Street NE at 22nd Avenue NE. The application proposes to help keep the rural character of the Rural Golden Gate Estates by maintaining a preserve in the southeastern portion of the 2-parcel site along 8th Street NE (as shown on the Conceptual Site Plan). The Preserve is proposed to be 0.78 acres, which is a significant portion of the entire site (approx. 15%). The section of 22nd Avenue NE that runs east of 8th Street NE, is a two-lane rural road with no lane markings. This approximately 3,000 feet segment of 22nd Avenue NE is a very low traffic generation road, since it dead-ends at a canal. There are currently 30 dwelling units developed on this segment of roadway. Because this segment of 22nd Avenue NE is not a through road, there should be no reason for church members to drive east to the canal or cause any impact to 22nd Avenue NE residents. The proposed church is to be constructed with a maximum of 100 seats in a building that will measure no greater than 5,000 square feet with a maximum height of 30 feet. The proposed steeple will be no taller than 50 feet tall. The companion Conditional Uses zoning petition (PL20190001326) limits the days and times of operation (“The hours of operation for the church will be Wednesday and Sunday for a maximum of 6 hours per day”) among several other Proposed Conditions of Approval. The Conditions of Approval will help reduce the impact of the proposed church on the surrounding residential area. The size of this project has been significantly reduced since the application was first submitted. The applicant worked very cooperatively to meet all of the requests of County staff to reduce the impacts on the surrounding area. The applicant reduced the maximum seats from 250 to 100; reduced the square feet of the building from 9,000 to 5,000; reduced the maximum height of the building from 50 to 30 feet; and reduced architectural features such as steeples from 60 feet to 50 feet tall. The Rural Golden Gate Estates SubElement of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan states, “Projects directly abutting residential property (property zoned E-Estates and without an approved conditional use) shall provide, at a minimum, a seventy-five (75) feet wide buffer in which no parking uses are permitted. Twenty-five (25) feet of the width of the buffer along the developed area shall be a landscape buffer. A minimum of fifty (50) feet of the buffer width shall consist of retained native vegetation and must be consistent with subsection 3.05.07H. of the Collier County Land Development Code (LDC).” The applicant increased the buffer width of 20 feet from the original application submittal to meet the required buffer of 75 feet wide with no parking uses permitted within 9.A.5.a Packet Pg. 1344 Attachment: Staff Report CPSS-2019-11 IPP Church (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) Page | 9 of 13 the buffer. The applicant’s proposed GMPA text states, “The project will provide an enhanced landscape buffer in lieu of a masonry wall required between the adjacent residential properties and the subject property by Section 5.03.02.H.1.a. of the Land Development Code. To the north and west, the enhanced landscape buffer will be provided with supplemental plantings within that the 75-foot native vegetation buffer.” Potable water is not available from Collier County Water and Sewer services at the property and therefore will have to be provided through private onsite well and septic. The project will provide potable water and fire protection onsite via a private potable water well. Sanitary sewer will be provided via a private onsite septic sewer system. The applicant has stated there are no existing or anticipated deficiencies with the proposed potable water or sanitary sewer systems. Compatibility: The proposed church site is surrounded by residential and agricultural uses. Churches coexist within residential areas throughout the County. With the limited hours and days of operation and the fact that this is proposed for a small congregation, this church should create almost zero impact on the surrounding residential area. In staff’s opinion this proposed church is compatible, because this small church is expected to create almost no impact to the surrounding area and the fact that small churches co-exist well within the residential and agricultural uses in all other parts of Collier County. Justifications for Proposed Amendment: According to the applicant’s submitted information, a large percentage of the church membership lives within 2 miles of the proposed church site (see previous map). County Planning staff supports projects that reduce vehicle miles traveled. The proposed small-scale Growth Management Plan Amendment creates a new subdistrict in the Golden Gate Area Master Plan, Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element, Estates Mixed Use District. The 8th Street NE-22nd Avenue NE Subdistrict will allow this small church to operate at the proposed location. Identification and Analysis of the Pertinent Small Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment Criteria in Florida Statutes Chapter 163.3187: Process for adoption of small scale comprehensive plan amendment. 1) A small scale development amendment may be adopted under the following conditions: (a) The proposed amendment involves a use of 50 acres or fewer and: [The subject site comprises ±5.15 acres.] (b) The proposed amendment does not involve a text change to the goals, policies, and objectives of the local government’s comprehensive plan, but only proposes a land use change to the future land use map for 9.A.5.a Packet Pg. 1345 Attachment: Staff Report CPSS-2019-11 IPP Church (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) Page | 10 of 13 a site-specific small scale development activity. However, text changes that relate directly to, and are adopted simultaneously with, the small scale future land use map amendment shall be permissible under this section. [This amendment does include a text change to the Comprehensive Plan and those text changes are directly related to the proposed Golden Gate Area Future Land Use Map amendment.] (c) The property that is the subject of the proposed amendment is not located within an area of critical state concern, unless the project subject to the proposed amendment involves the construction of affordable housing units meeting the criteria of s. 420.0004(3), and is located within an area of critical state concern designated by s. 380.0552 or by the Administration Commission pursuant to s. 380.05(1). [The subject property is not located within an Area of Critical State Concern.] (2) Small scale development amendments adopted pursuant to this section require only one public hearing before the governing board, which shall be an adoption hearing as described in s. 163.3184(11). [This project will be heard with only one public adoption hearing.] (3) If the small scale development amendment involves a site within a rural area of opportunity as defined under s. 288.0656(2)(d) for the duration of such designation, the acreage limit listed in subsection (1) shall be increased by 100 percent. The local government approving the small scale plan amendment shall certify to the state land planning agency that the plan amendment furthers the economic objectives set forth in the executive order issued under s. 288.0656(7), and the property subject to the plan amendment shall undergo public review to ensure that all concurrency requirements and federal, state, and local environmental permit requirements are met. [This amendment does not involve a site within a rural area of opportunity.] (4) Comprehensive plans may only be amended in such a way as to preserve the internal consistency of the plan pursuant to s. 163.3177. Corrections, updates, or modifications of current costs which were set out as part of the comprehensive plan shall not, for the purposes of this act, be deemed to be amendments. [This amendment preserves the internal consistency of the plan and is not a correction, update, or modification of current costs which were set out as part of the comprehensive plan.] Environmental Impacts and Historical and Archaeological Impacts: Jaime Cook, Principal Environmental Specialist, completed her review and approved this petition, without any conditions, on 04/17/2020. The subject property is 5.15 acres. The acreage of native vegetation on site has been field verified by staff during review of the Conditional Use for the project. The project is currently zoned Estates with a Wellfield Risk Management Special Treatment Overlay Zone W-4 (ST/W-4). The proposed GMP amendment will not affect the requirements of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME) of the GMP. Native vegetation on site will be retained in accordance with the requirements of CCME Policy 6.1.1 and section 3.05.07 of the LDC. Environmental Services staff recommends approval. Public Facilities Impacts: Eric Fey, Senior Project Manager with Collier County Public Utilities Engineering & Project Management Division, stated his review is not applicable for this petition on November 18, 2019. This site has no public utilities and will instead be serviced by well and septic facilities. 9.A.5.a Packet Pg. 1346 Attachment: Staff Report CPSS-2019-11 IPP Church (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) Page | 11 of 13 Transportation Impacts: Michael Sawyer, Project Manager with Collier County Transportation Planning, completed his review and approved this petition, without any conditions, on April 16, 2020. Transportation Element: The project is consistent with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the Growth Management Plan, which states, “The County Commission shall review all rezone petitions, SRA designation applications, conditional use petitions, and proposed amendments to the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) affecting the overall countywide density or intensity of permissible development, with consideration of their impact on the overall County transportation system, and shall not approve any petition or application that would directly access a deficient roadway segment as identified in the current AUIR or if it impacts an adjacent roadway segment that is deficient as identified in the current AUIR, or which significantly impacts a roadway segment or adjacent roadway segment that is currently operating and/or is projected to operate below an adopted Level of Service Standard within the five year AUIR planning period, unless specific mitigating stipulations are also approved. A petition or application has significant impacts if the traffic impact statement reveals that any of the following occur: a. For links (roadway segments) directly accessed by the project where project traffic is equal to or exceeds 2% of the adopted LOS standard service volume; b. For links adjacent to links directly accessed by the project where project traffic is equal to or exceeds 2% of the adopted LOS standard service volume; and c. For all other links the project traffic is considered to be significant up to the point where it is equ al to or exceeds 3% of the adopted LOS standard service volume. Mitigating stipulations shall be based upon a mitigation plan prepared by the applicant and submitted as part of the traffic impact statement that addresses the project’s significant impacts on all roadways.” According to the TIS provided with this petition dated (revised) August 6, 2020, the proposed Iglesia Pentecostes Church will generate a projected total of +/- 8 PM weekday, peak hour, 2-way trips on the adjacent roadway 8th Street North East which is classified as a major collector by FDOT. The closest major road segments tracked in the current 2020 AUIR are Golden Gate Boulevard from Wilson Blvd to 8th St., segment ID 123.0, currently operating at a LOS “C” with a remaining capacity of 845 trips and a peak capacity service volume of 2,300 with a peak direction being East. The next road segment is Golden Gate Boulevard from 8th St. to Everglades Boulevard, segment ID 123.1, currently operating at a LOS “C” with a remaining capacity of 855 trips and a peak capacity service volume of 2,300 with a peak direction being East. The next road segment is Randal Boulevard from Immokalee Road to Everglades, segment ID 132, currently operating at a LOS “D” with a remaining capacity of 7 trips and a peak capacity service volume of 900 with a peak direction being East. Staff notes that there is an expected deficiency due to traffic counts in 2022 as well as a deficiency due to trip bank in 2021 for this segment. There is a funded road improvement project for Randall scheduled for completion within the 5-year planning window as well as an FDOT funded improvement for the intersection of Immokalee and Randall also within t he same 5-year planning window. Following state statute 169.3180 any facility determined to be transportation deficient with existing, committed and vested trips plus background trips, shall require the costs for said deficiency to be the responsibility of Collier County. For these reasons Transportation Planning staff find that the subject Conditional Use can be found consistent with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the Growth Management Plan. Transportation Review: Transportation Planning staff has reviewed the GMPA petition request, the Conditional Use document and Master Plan for right-of-way and access issues and recommends approval. 9.A.5.a Packet Pg. 1347 Attachment: Staff Report CPSS-2019-11 IPP Church (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) Page | 12 of 13 NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING (NIM) SYNOPSIS: A Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM), as required by Land Development Code (LDC) Section 10.03.05 A, was duly advertised, noticed, and held on Thursday, April 29, 2021, at 6:05 pm and located at 13260 Immokalee Rd, Suite 7, Naples, FL 34120. This is the location that the Iglesias Pentecostes Peniel Church currently meets. This NIM was advertised, noticed, and held jointly for this small scale GMP amendment and the companion Conditional Use (CU) petition. Approximately 75 people signed in that attended the NIM. The pastor had discussed how the church operated and what kind of church they were. The church services are in Spanish. The consultant stated that the church was to be a single-story structure – not 3 stories as the news had reported. A neighbor to the subject site asked for a hand-raising poll to see how many attendees lived near the project. The hand-raising showed the majority of the attendees at the NIM lived near the project. The consultant discussed the specifics for this project (number of seats, square footage, etc.) The pastor mentioned that their sister church located in a residential community in Naples Park has never experienced a noise complaint. Many attendees seem to reflect concern over increased traffic and environmental concerns and spoke of general opposition to locating a church in their neighborhood. The meeting ended at approximately 7:05 p.m. [synopsis prepared by Sue Faulkner, Principal Planner, Comprehensive Planning Section] PUBLIC CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED BY STAFF: Comprehensive Planning staff received a signed petition with approximately 59 signatures supporting this project and also a signed petition with approximately 260 signatures opposing this project. Staff also received an individual neighbor’s letter of support uploaded Nov. 11, 2020 and on August 26, 2021 a phone call to staff of strong opposition from one of the neighbors, Rick Randall, who had signed the oppositional petition, restating to staff that a church has no business being in a residential area. All of these correspondence items may be found in your agenda packet. FINDING AND CONCLUSIONS: • The reason for this GMPA and companion CU zoning petition is to allow a church to operate in the Estates Designation, Mixed Use District, Residential Estates Subdistrict by creating a new subdistrict. • The Church has purchased the subject site. • The majority of the current church members live in the surrounding area. • There are only a few churches within Golden Gate Estates, most churches are located on arterial roadways along the perimeter of the Estates Mixed Use District. • There are no adverse environmental impacts as a result of this petition. • No historic or archaeological sites are affected by this amendment. • There are no utility-related concerns as a result of this petition. • There are no concerns for impacts upon other public infrastructure. 9.A.5.a Packet Pg. 1348 Attachment: Staff Report CPSS-2019-11 IPP Church (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) Page | 13 of 13 • There are no transportation concerns as a result of this petition. • The use is generally compatible with surrounding development based upon the high-level review conducted for a GMP amendment. LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: This Staff Report was reviewed by the County Attorney’s Office on September 2, 2021. The criteria for GMP amendments to the Future Land Use Element are in Sections 163.3177(1)(f) and 163.3177(6)(a)2, Florida Statutes. The criteria for changes to the Future Land Use Map is in Section 163.3177(6)(a)8, Florida Statutes [HFAC] STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Collier County Planning Commission forward Petition PL20190001333/CPSS-2019- 11 to the Board of County Commissioners with a recommendation to approve (adopt) and transmit to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity. Prepared by: Sue Faulkner, Principal Planner, Comprehensive Planning Section, Zoning Division 9.A.5.a Packet Pg. 1349 Attachment: Staff Report CPSS-2019-11 IPP Church (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) 9.A.5.b Packet Pg. 1350 Attachment: Ordinance - 081621(3) (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) 9.A.5.b Packet Pg. 1351 Attachment: Ordinance - 081621(3) (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) 9.A.5.b Packet Pg. 1352 Attachment: Ordinance - 081621(3) (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) 9.A.5.b Packet Pg. 1353 Attachment: Ordinance - 081621(3) (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) 9.A.5.b Packet Pg. 1354 Attachment: Ordinance - 081621(3) (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) 9.A.5.b Packet Pg. 1355 Attachment: Ordinance - 081621(3) (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) 9.A.5.b Packet Pg. 1356 Attachment: Ordinance - 081621(3) (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) 9.A.5.b Packet Pg. 1357 Attachment: Ordinance - 081621(3) (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) 1 APPLICATION FOR A REQUEST TO AMEND THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN APPLICATOIN NUMBER: ___________________ DATE RECEIVED: ______________________________ PRE-APPLICATION CONFERENCE DATE: __________________________________________________ DATE SUFFICIENT: ______________________________________________________________________ This application, with all required supplemental data and information, must be completed and accompanied by the appropriate fee, and returned to the Growth Management Department, Zoning Division, Comprehensive Planning Section, 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida 34104. 239-252- 2400. The application must be reviewed by staff for sufficiency within 30 calendar days following the filing deadline before it will be processed and advertised for public hearing. The applicant will be notified in writing, of the sufficiency determination. If insufficient, the applicant will have 30 days to remedy the deficiencies. For additional information on the processing of the applica tion, see Resolution 97-431 as amended by Resolution 98-18 (both attached). If you have any questions, please contact the Comprehensive Planning Section at 239-252-2400. SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS I. GENERAL INFOMRATION A. Name of Applicant ______________________________________________________________ Company _______________________________________________________________________ Address _________________________________________________________________________ City ______________________________ State _____________________ Zip Code __________ Phone Number ______________________ Fax Number ________________________________ B. Name of Agent * _________________________________________________________________ • THIS WILL BE THE PERSON CONTACTED FOR ALL BUSINESS RELATED TO THE PETITION. Company________________________________________________________________________ Address ___________________________________________________________________ City ___________________________ State ____________________ Zip Code ________ Phone Number ____________________ Fax Number ___________________________ C. Name of Owner (s) of Record ____________________________________________________ Address _________________________________________________________________________ City ___________________________ State ___________________ Zip Code ________ Phone Number _______________________ Fax Number ______________________________ D. Name, Address and Qualifications of additional planners, architects, engineers, environmental consultants and other professionals providing information contained in this application. II. Disclosure of Interest Information: A. If the property is owned fee simple by an INDIVIDUAL, Tenancy by the entirety, tenancy in common, or joint tenancy, list all parties with an ownership interest as well as the percentage of such interest. (Use additional sheets if necessary). 9.A.5.c Packet Pg. 1358 Attachment: GMPA Application - Whole Package (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) 2 Name and Address Percentage of Ownership __________________________________________ _________________________ __________________________________________ _________________________ __________________________________________ _________________________ __________________________________________ _________________________ __________________________________________ _________________________ B. If the property is owned by a CORPORATION, list the officers and stockholders and the percentage of stock owned by each. Name and Address Percentage of Stock __________________________________________ _________________________ __________________________________________ _________________________ __________________________________________ _________________________ __________________________________________ _________________________ __________________________________________ _________________________ C. If the property is in the name of a TRUSTEE, list the beneficiaries of the trust with the percentage of interest. Name and Address Percentage of Interest __________________________________________ _________________________ __________________________________________ _________________________ __________________________________________ _________________________ __________________________________________ _________________________ __________________________________________ _________________________ __________________________________________ _________________________ D. If the property is in the name of a GENERAL or LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, list the name of the general and/or limited partners. Name and Address Percentage of Ownership __________________________________________ _________________________ __________________________________________ _________________________ __________________________________________ _________________________ __________________________________________ _________________________ __________________________________________ _________________________ E. If there is a CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE, with an individual or individuals, a Corporation, Trustee, or a Partnership, list the names of the contract purchasers below, including the officers, stockholders, beneficiaries, or partners. Name and Address Percentage of Ownership __________________________________________ _________________________ __________________________________________ _________________________ 9.A.5.c Packet Pg. 1359 Attachment: GMPA Application - Whole Package (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) 3 __________________________________________ _________________________ __________________________________________ _________________________ __________________________________________ _________________________ __________________________________________ _________________________ __________________________________________ _________________________ Date of Contract: __________________ F. If any contingency clause or contract terms involve additional parties, li st all individuals or officers, if a corporation, partnership, or trust. Name and Address ________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________ G. Date subject property acquired ( ) leased ( ):________Term of lease______yrs./mos. If, Petitioner has option to buy, indicate date of option:______________ and date option terminates: ______________, or anticipated closing: _______________________. H. Should any changes of ownership or changes in contracts for purchase occur subsequent to the date of application, but prior to the date of the final public hearing, it is the responsibility of the applicant, or agent on his behalf, to submit a supplemental disclosure of interest form. III. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY: A. LEGAL DESCRIPTION ______________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ B. GENERAL LOCATION _____________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ C. PLANNING COMMUNITY D. TAZ _____________________ E. SIZE IN ACRES F. ZONING _________________ G. SURROUNDING LAND USE PATTERN________________________________________________ H. FUTURE LAND USE MAP DESIGNATION(S)____________________________________ IV. TYPE OF REQUEST: A. GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN ELEMENT (S) TO BE AMENDED: _______ Housing Element _______ Recreation/Open Space _______ Traffic Circulation Sub-Element _______ Mass Transit Sub-Element _______ Aviation Sub-Element _______ Potable Water Sub-Element _______ Sanitary Sewer Sub-Element _______ NGWAR Sub-Element _______ Solid Waste Sub-Element _______ Drainage Sub-Element 9.A.5.c Packet Pg. 1360 Attachment: GMPA Application - Whole Package (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) 4 _______ Capital Improvement Element _______ CCME Element _______ Future Land Use Element _______ Golden Gate Master Plan _______ Immokalee Master Plan B. AMEND PAGE (S) _________________OF THE _______________________________ELEMENT AS FOLLOWS: (Use Strike-through to identify language to be deleted; Use Underline to identify language to be added). Attach additional pages if necessary: _________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________ C. AMEND FUTURE LAND USE MAP(S) DESIGNATION FROM ______________________________ TO _______________________________________________________________________________ D. AMEND OTHER MAP(S) AND EXHIBITS AS FOLLOWS: (Name & Page #) ________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________ E. DESCRIBE ADDITINAL CHANGES REQUESTED: ________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________ __________________________________________________________________________________ V. REQUIRED INFORMATION: NOTE: ALL AERIALS MUST BE AT A SCALE OF NO SMALLER THAN I”=400’. At least one copy reduced to 8- 1/2 x 11 shall be provided of all aerials and/or maps. A. LAND USE __________ Provide general location map showing surrounding developments (PUD, DRI’s, existing zoning) with subject property outlined. __________ Provide most recent aerial of site showing subject boundaries, source, and date. __________ Provide a map and summary table of existing land use and zoning within a radius of 300 feet from boundaries of subject property. B. FUTURE LAND USE AND DESIGNATION __________ Provide map of existing Future Land Use Designation(s) of subject property and adjacent lands, with acreage totals for each land use designation on the subject property. C. ENVIRONMENTAL ___________ Provide most recent aerial and summary table of acreage of native habitats and soils occurring on site. HABITAT IDENTIFICATION MUST BE CONSISTENT WITH THE FDOT-FLORIDA LAND USE, COVER AND FORMS CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM (FLUCCS CODE). NOTE: THIS MAY BE INDICATED ON SAME AERIAL AS THE LAND USE AERIAL IN “A” ABOVE. ___________ Provide a summary table of Federal (US Fish & Wildlife Service) a nd State (Florida Game & Freshwater Fish Commission) listed plant and animal species known to occur on the site and/or known to inhabit biological communities similar to the site (e.g. panther or black bear range, avian rookery, bird migratory route, etc.).Identify historic and/or 9.A.5.c Packet Pg. 1361 Attachment: GMPA Application - Whole Package (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) 5 archaeological sites on the subject property. D. GROWTH MANAGEMENT Reference F.A.C. Chapter 163-3177 and Collier County’s Capital Improvements Element Policy 1.1.2 (Copies attached). 1. INSERT “Y” FOR YES OR “N” FOR NO IN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING: ___________Is the proposed amendment located in an Area of Critical State Concern? IF so, identify area located in ACSC. ___________Is the proposed amendment directly related to a proposed Development of Regional Impact pursuant to Chapter 380 F.S. ? ___________Is the proposed amendment directly related to a proposed Small Scale Development Activity pursuant to Subsection 163.3187 (1)(c), F.S. ? Does the proposed amendment create a significant impact in population which is defined as a potential increase in County-wide population by more than 5% of population projections? (Reference Capital Improvement Element Policy 1.1.2). If yes, indicate mitigation measures being proposed in conjunction with the proposed amendment. __________ Does the proposed land use cause an increase in density and/or intensity to the uses permitted in a specific land use designation and district identified (commercial, industrial, etc.) or is the proposed land use a new land use designation or district? If so, provide data and analysis to support the suitability of land for the proposed use, and of environmentally sensitive land, ground water and natural resources. E. PUBLIC FACILITIES 1. Provide the existing Level of Service Standard (LOS) and document the impact the proposed change will have on the following public facilities: __________ Potable Water __________ Sanitary Sewer __________ Arterial & Collector Roads; Name specific road and LOS ____________________________ ____________________________ ____________________________ ____________________________ __________ Drainage __________ Solid Waste __________ Parks: Community and Regional If the proposed amendment involves an increase in residential density, or an increase in intensity for commercial and/or industrial development that would cause the LOS for public facilities to fall below the adopted LOS, indicate mitigation measures being proposed in conjunction with the proposed amendment. (Reference Capital Improvement Element Objective 1 and Policies) 2. ________ Provide a map showing the location of existing services and public facilities that will serve the subject property (i.e. water, sewer, fire protection, police protection, schools and emergency medical services. 3. ________ Document proposed services and public facilities, identify provider, and describe the effect the proposed change will have on schools, fire protection and emergency medical services. F. OTHER Identify the following areas relating to the subject property: 9.A.5.c Packet Pg. 1362 Attachment: GMPA Application - Whole Package (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) 6 ______ Flood zone based on Flood Insurance Rate Map data (FIRM). ______ Location of wellfields and cones of influence, if applicable. (Identified on Collier County Zoning Maps) ______ Traffic Congestion Boundary, if applicable ______ Coastal Management Boundary, if applicable ______ High Noise Contours (65 LDN or higher) surrounding the Naples Airport, if applicable (identified on Collier County Zoning Maps). G. SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION ______ $16,700.00 non-refundable filing fee made payable to the Board of County Commissioners due at time of submittal. (Plus proportionate share of advertising costs) ______ $9,000.00 non-refundable filing fee for a Small Scale Amendment made payable to the Board of County Commissioners due at time of submittal. (Plus proportionate share of advertising costs) ______ Proof of ownership (copy of deed) ______ Notarized Letter of Authorization if Agent is not the Owner (See attached form) ______ 1 Original and 5 complete, signed applications with all attachments including maps, at time of submittal. After sufficiency is completed, 25 copies of the complete application will be required. * If you have held a pre-application meeting and paid the pre-application fee of $250.00 at the meeting, deduct that amount from the above application fee amount when submitting your application. All pre-application fees are included in the total application submittal fee. Otherwise the overage will be applied to future proportionate share advertising costs. * Maps shall include: North arrow, name and location of principal roadways and shall be at a scale of 1”=400’ or at a scale as determined during the pre-application meeting. 9.A.5.c Packet Pg. 1363 Attachment: GMPA Application - Whole Package (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) 8 9.A.5.c Packet Pg. 1364 Attachment: GMPA Application - Whole Package (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) 9 9.A.5.c Packet Pg. 1365 Attachment: GMPA Application - Whole Package (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) 10 9.A.5.c Packet Pg. 1366 Attachment: GMPA Application - Whole Package (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) PROPOSED PRESERVE AREA AREA = 28,897 SF AREA = 0.66 AC PROPOSED CHURCH 22ND AVENUE NE (COUNTY ROW)8TH STREET NE(COUNTY ROW)WATER MANAGEMENT WATER MANAGEMENT75' WIDE NATIVE BUFFER (TYPE "B" SCREENING)10' TYPE "D" LANDSCAPE BUFFER75' WIDE NATIVE BUFFER(TYPE "B" SCREENING)10' TYPE "D" LANDSCAPE BUFFER PROPERTY BOUNDARY EXISTING 50' ROADWAY EASEMENT PRESERVE BOUNDARY EX. PROPERTY LINE PRESERVE BOUNDARY EDGE OF EX. ASPHALT PROPOSED SEPTIC FIELD LOCATION PROPOSED POTABLE WELL LOCATION EDGE OF PRESERVE SETBACK EXISTING 30' ROADWAY EASEMENT PROPOSED SIDEWALK CONNECTION PROPOSED DUMPSTER AND RECYCLING AREA GRASS PARKING AREA GRASS PARKING AREA WATER MANAGEMENTWATER MANAGEMENT 117' 25' PRESERVE SETBACK EDGE OF PRESERVE SETBACK 00 100'50' SCALE: 1" = 100' N IGLESIA PENTECOSTES PENIEL - GOLDEN GATE CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN RDA CONSULTING ENGINEERS 800 HARBOUR DRIVE, SUITE 210 NAPLES, FLORIDA 34103 PHONE: (239) 649-1551 FAX: (239) 649-7112 WWW.RDAFL.COM PROJECT #:RDA19084 PAGE:1 OF 2 DATE:08/24/2021 9.A.5.c Packet Pg. 1367 Attachment: GMPA Application - Whole Package (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias IGLESIA PENTECOSTES PENIEL - GOLDEN GATE CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN RDA CONSULTING ENGINEERS 800 HARBOUR DRIVE, SUITE 210 NAPLES, FLORIDA 34103 PHONE: (239) 649-1551 FAX: (239) 649-7112 WWW.RDAFL.COM PROJECT #:RDA19084 PAGE:2 OF 2 DATE:08/24/2021 PARKING SUMMARY BUILDING USE # OF SEATS MINIMUM REQUIRED SPACES SPACES REQUIRED SPACES PROVIDED CHURCH 100 SEATS IN THE CHAPEL AREA 3 SPACES FOR EACH 7 SEATS IN THE CHAPEL AREA 42.9 = 43 45 (2 HC SPACES) NOTE PARKING SPACE REQUIREMENT PER SECTION 4.05.04.g. TABLE 17 OF THE COLLIER COUNTY LDC. HANDICAP SPACES HAVE BEEN PROVIDED BASED ON COLLIER COUNTY LDC SECTION 4.05.07 TABLE 19. GENERAL NOTES: 1.VEGETATION WITHIN THE PRESERVE WILL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF COLLIER COUNTY LDC SECTION 3.05.07. 2.A SIDEWALK ALONG 22ND AVENUE NE WILL BE PROVIDED AND WILL CONNECT TO THE EXISTING SIDEWALK ALONG 8TH STREET NE. 3.THESE PLANS ARE FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMITTING AND ARE NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION USE. 4.PER SECTION 4.05.02.B.1.A.III. OF THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, “UP TO 70 PERCENT OF THE PARKING SPACES FOR HOUSES OF WORSHIP AND SCHOOLS MAY BE SURFACED WITH GRASS OR LAWN, WHEN THE COUNTY MANAGER OR DESIGNEE DETERMINES THAT THE PAVING OF SOME OR ALL PARKING SPACES FOR HOUSES OF WORSHIP AND SCHOOLS WILL HAVE SIGNIFICANT NEGATIVE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS.”. THIS PROJECT WILL BE PROVIDING GRASS PARKING FOR A MINIMUM OF 25% OF THE PROPOSED PARKING SPACES. PRESERVE AREA CALCULATION TOTAL SITE AREA 224,270 SF = 5.15 AC NATIVE VEGETATION 4.32 AC PRESERVE REQUIREMENT 15% REQUIRED PRESERVE 28,314 SF = 0.65 AC PROVIDED PRESERVE 28,897 SF = 0.66 AC ADJACENT ZONING AND LAND USE ZONING LAND USE N ESTATE, E RESIDENTIAL S ROW, THEN ESTATE, E RESIDENTIAL E ROW, THEN ESTATE, E RESIDENTIAL W ESTATE, E RESIDENTIAL PLANNING NOTES CURRENT ZONING E PROPOSED ZONING E / CONDITIONAL USE CURRENT LAND USE UNDEVELOPED FUTURE LAND USE ESTATES DESIGNATION PROPOSED LAND USE CHURCH NUMBER OF SEATS 100 SEATS MAXIMUM CHURCH SQUARE FOOTAGE 5,000 SF MAXIMUM ZONED BUILDING HEIGHT 30 FT MAXIMUM ACTUAL BUILDING HEIGHT 30 FT UTILITY NOTE: POTABLE WATER WILL BE PROVIDED VIA A PRIVATE GROUND WATER WELL AND SANITARY SEWER TREATMENT WILL BE PROVIDED VIA A PRIVATE SEPTIC TANK AND DRAIN FIELD. LOCATIONS OF POTABLE WATER WELL AND SEPTIC TANK WILL BE DETERMINED UPON FINAL SITE DEVELOPMENT PLANNING AND ARE THEREFORE NOT SHOWN ON THIS CONCEPTUAL MASTER PLAN. REQUIRED SETBACKS SUMMARY REQUIRED BUILDING FRONT - CORNER STREET SETBACK 37.5' FRONT - CORNER STREET SETBACK 37.5' SIDE SETBACK 30' REAR SETBACK 75' PRESERVE PRINCIPAL SETBACK 25' ACCESSORY SETBACK 10' LAND USE SUMMARY ACRES % OF SITE WATER MANAGEMENT +/- 0.25 4.8% PERIMETER BUFFERS +/- 1.55 30.1% PAVEMENT / SIDEWALK +/- 0.50 9.7% BUILDING FOOTPRINT AREA +/- 0.12 2.3% PRESERVE AREA +/- 0.66 12.8% MISC. OPEN SPACE +/- 2.07 40.3% TOTAL SITE AREA +/- 5.15 100% 9.A.5.c Packet Pg. 1368 Attachment: GMPA Application - Whole Package (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Iglesia Pentecostes Peniel Church GMPA (PL20190001333) Golden Gate Area Master Plan Page 1 of 2 800 Harbour Drive, Suite 210, Naples, FL 34103 • (O) 239-649-1551 • (F) 239-649-7112 info@rdafl.com • www.rdafl.com Exhibit IVB – Proposed Language Revise the GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN *** *** *** *** *** Text Break *** *** *** *** *** RURAL GOLDEN GATE ESTATES SUB-ELEMENT *** *** *** *** *** Text Break *** *** *** *** *** B. LAND USE DESIGNATION DESCTRIPTION SECTION *** *** *** *** *** Text Break *** *** *** *** *** 1. ESTATES DESIGNATION *** *** *** *** *** Text Break *** *** *** *** *** A. Estates – Mixed Use District *** *** *** *** *** Text Break *** *** *** *** *** 6. 8th Street NE – 22nd Avenue NE Subdistrict [Beginning Page 16] The 8th Street NE – 22nd Avenue NE Subdistrict is located on the northwest corner of 8th Street NE and 22nd Avenue NE, consists of 5.15 acres, and comprises Golden Gate Estates Unit 23 TR 133, less E 350ft and Golden Gate Est Unit 23 E 350ft of TR 133. The purpose of this Subdistrict is to provide for churches and other places of worship and their related uses. The following use is permitted within the Subdistrict through the conditional use process: (a) Churches and other places of worship The following church-related uses are prohibited within the Subdistrict: (a) Day care centers (b) Private schools (c) Soup kitchens (d) Homeless shelters The maximum total floor area allowed in this Subdistrict is 5,000 square feet, including no more than 100 seats. The maximum height of buildings shall be 30 feet. Architectural features such as steeples may be a maximum height of 50 feet. The project will provide an enhanced landscape buffer in lieu of a masonry wall required between the adjacent residential properties and the subject property by Section 5.03.02.H.1.a. of the Land 9.A.5.c Packet Pg. 1369 Attachment: GMPA Application - Whole Package (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) Iglesia Pentecostes Peniel Church GMPA (PL20190001333) Golden Gate Area Master Plan Page 2 of 2 800 Harbour Drive, Suite 210, Naples, FL 34103 • (O) 239-649-1551 • (F) 239-649-7112 info@rdafl.com • www.rdafl.com Development Code. To the north and the west, the enhanced landscape buffer will be provided with supplemental plantings within the 75’ native vegetation buffer. 9.A.5.c Packet Pg. 1370 Attachment: GMPA Application - Whole Package (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) 9.A.5.cPacket Pg. 1371Attachment: GMPA Application - Whole Package (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) 9.A.5.cPacket Pg. 1372Attachment: GMPA Application - Whole Package (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) DocuSign Envelope ID: E2C07B7E-A635-4473-9D20-ACCAC2884557 9.A.5.c Packet Pg. 1373 Attachment: GMPA Application - Whole Package (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) DocuSign Envelope ID: E2C07B7E-A635-4473-9D20-ACCAC2884557 9.A.5.c Packet Pg. 1374 Attachment: GMPA Application - Whole Package (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) DocuSign Envelope ID: E2C07B7E-A635-4473-9D20-ACCAC2884557 9.A.5.c Packet Pg. 1375 Attachment: GMPA Application - Whole Package (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) DocuSign Envelope ID: E2C07B7E-A635-4473-9D20-ACCAC2884557 9.A.5.c Packet Pg. 1376 Attachment: GMPA Application - Whole Package (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) DocuSign Envelope ID: E2C07B7E-A635-4473-9D20-ACCAC2884557 9.A.5.c Packet Pg. 1377 Attachment: GMPA Application - Whole Package (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) DocuSign Envelope ID: E2C07B7E-A635-4473-9D20-ACCAC2884557 9.A.5.c Packet Pg. 1378 Attachment: GMPA Application - Whole Package (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) DocuSign Envelope ID: E2C07B7E-A635-4473-9D20-ACCAC2884557 9.A.5.c Packet Pg. 1379 Attachment: GMPA Application - Whole Package (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) DocuSign Envelope ID: E2C07B7E-A635-4473-9D20-ACCAC2884557 9.A.5.c Packet Pg. 1380 Attachment: GMPA Application - Whole Package (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) DocuSign Envelope ID: E2C07B7E-A635-4473-9D20-ACCAC2884557 9.A.5.c Packet Pg. 1381 Attachment: GMPA Application - Whole Package (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) DocuSign Envelope ID: E2C07B7E-A635-4473-9D20-ACCAC2884557 9.A.5.c Packet Pg. 1382 Attachment: GMPA Application - Whole Package (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) DocuSign Envelope ID: E2C07B7E-A635-4473-9D20-ACCAC2884557 9.A.5.c Packet Pg. 1383 Attachment: GMPA Application - Whole Package (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) DocuSign Envelope ID: E2C07B7E-A635-4473-9D20-ACCAC2884557 9.A.5.c Packet Pg. 1384 Attachment: GMPA Application - Whole Package (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) DocuSign Envelope ID: E2C07B7E-A635-4473-9D20-ACCAC2884557 9.A.5.c Packet Pg. 1385 Attachment: GMPA Application - Whole Package (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) DocuSign Envelope ID: E2C07B7E-A635-4473-9D20-ACCAC2884557 9.A.5.c Packet Pg. 1386 Attachment: GMPA Application - Whole Package (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) 9.A.5.c Packet Pg. 1387 Attachment: GMPA Application - Whole Package (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 252-5724 ADDRESSING CHECKLIST Please complete the following and email to GMD_Addressing@colliergov.net or fax to the Operations Division at 239-252-5724 or submit in person to the Addressing Section at the above address. Form must be signed by Addressing personnel prior to pre-application meeting, please allow 3 days for processing. Not all items will apply to every project. Items in bold type are required. FOLIO NUMBERS MUST BE PROVIDED. Forms older than 6 months will require additional review and approval by the Addressing Section. PETITION TYPE (Indicate type below, complete a separate Addressing Checklist for each Petition type) BL (Blasting Permit) BD (Boat Dock Extension) Carnival/Circus Permit CU (Conditional Use) EXP (Excavation Permit) FP (Final Plat LLA (Lot Line Adjustment) PNC (Project Name Change) PPL (Plans & Plat Review) PSP (Preliminary Subdivision Plat) PUD Rezone RZ (Standard Rezone) SDP (Site Development Plan) SDPA (SDP Amendment) SDPI (Insubstantial Change to SDP) SIP (Site Im provement Plan) SIPI (Insubstantial Change to SIP) SNR (Street Name Change) SNC (Street Name Change – Unplatted) TDR (Transfer of Development Rights) VA (Variance) VRP (Vegetation Removal Permit) VRSFP (Vegetation Removal & Site Fill Permit) OTHER LEGAL DESCRIPT ION of subject property or properties (copy of lengthy description may be attached) FOLIO (Property ID) NUMBER(s) of above (attach to, or associate with, legal description if more than one) STREET ADDRESS or ADDRESSES (as applicable, if already assigned) PROPOSED STREET NAMES (if applicable) SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN NUMBER (for existing projects/sites only) LOCATION MAP must be attached showing exact location of project/site in relation to nearest public road right- of-way PROPOSED PROJECT NAME (if applicable) SDP - or AR or PL # SURVEY (copy - needed only for unplatted properties) CURRENT PROJECT NAME (if applicable) Rev. 6/9/2017 Page 1 of 2 S26 T48 R27 9.A.5.c Packet Pg. 1388 Attachment: GMPA Application - Whole Package (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 252-5724 Please Return Approved Checklist By: Email Personally picked up Applicant Name: Signature on Addressing Checklist does not constitute Project and/or Street Name approval and is subject to further review by the Operations Division. FOR STAFF USE ONLY Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Approved by: Date: Updated by: Date: IF OLDER THAN 6 MONTHS, FORM MUST BE UPDATED OR NEW FORM SUBMITTED Fax Email/Fax:Phone: Project or development names proposed for, or already appearing in, condominium documents (if application; indicate whether proposed or existing) Rev. 6/9/2017 Page 2 of 2 37750560009 37750560106 01/30/2020 9.A.5.c Packet Pg. 1389 Attachment: GMPA Application - Whole Package (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) 3/29/2019 Print Map maps.collierappraiser.com/mapprint.aspx?pagetitle=Iglesia Pentecostes Peniel - Golden Gate&orient=LANDSCAPE&paper=LETTER&minX=461611.0…1/1 Iglesia Pentecostes Peniel -Golden Gate Folio Number: 37750560009 Name: IGLESIA PENTECOSTES PENIEL INC Street# & Name: Build# / Unit#: 133 / 0 Legal Description: GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 23 E 350FT OF TR 133 2004. Collier County Property Appraiser. While the Collier County Property Appraiser is committed to providing the most accurate and up-to-date information, no warranties expressed or implied are provided for the data herein, its use, or its interpretation. 9.A.5.c Packet Pg. 1390 Attachment: GMPA Application - Whole Package (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) 3/29/2019 Print Map maps.collierappraiser.com/mapprint.aspx?pagetitle=&orient=LANDSCAPE&paper=LETTER&minX=461611.019566768&minY=704155.930133706&m…1/1 Folio Number: 37750560106 Name: IGLESIA PENTECOSTES PENIEL INC Street# & Name: Build# / Unit#: 133 / 1 Legal Description: GOLEN GATE ESTATES UNIT 23 TR 133, LESS E 350FT 2004. Collier County Property Appraiser. While the Collier County Property Appraiser is committed to providing the most accurate and up-to-date information, no warranties expressed or implied are provided for the data herein, its use, or its interpretation. 9.A.5.c Packet Pg. 1391 Attachment: GMPA Application - Whole Package (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) Iglesia Pentecostes Peniel Church GMPA (PL20190001333) Golden Gate Area Master Plan Page 1 of 7 800 Harbour Drive, Suite 2C, Naples, FL 34103 • (O) 239-649-1551 • (F) 239-649-7112 info@rdafl.com • www.rdafl.com Data & Needs Analysis To justify the need for a Future Land Use designation modification, a data and needs analysis review has been performed. This analysis identifies justifications to demonstrate the requested amendment is warranted. Criteria for this analysis include proximity of the local church’s parishioners, properties close to arterial and collector roadways, and existing availability of potential development sites between 5 and 7.5 acres from Interstate-75 (as the western boundary), to ten miles east (as the eastern boundary), to Golden Gate Parkway (as the southern boundary), to the Collier and Lee County border (as the northern boundary). The limiting criteria were selected based on vacancy, size, current market value of the land, and proximity to existing parishioners. The subject property, as well as any alternative sites, have been evaluated to ensure that the existing and future demographics will support the proposed land use based on the following: • Vicinity to existing local parishioners. • Property availability and compatibility with the proposed development. • Location of Alternative Facilities offering similar traditional worshiping opportunities. Vicinity to Existing Local Parishioners Demographic information is an indicator of demand for proposed services that currently do not exist. Data and statistics for the data analysis were obtained from the Church/applicant. Please refer to Exhibit H, the Adjacent Congressional Members Map. In this case, the parishioners are local to the area and as such, there will be li ttle to no impact to the expected population. Location of Alternative Facilities Offering Similar Traditional Worshiping Opportunities In defining a warranted use for the requested service, locations of existing facilities with identical or similar services provided were identified. Please refer to Exhibit I, Existing Adjacent Pentecostes Churches Map. The results are also listed below, along with the respective addresses and distance from the proposed church location. 1. Iglesia Christiana Pentecostes 6028 Radio Road, Naples, FL 34104 (12 mi) 2. Iglesia Pentecostes Peniel (Different Pastor) 757 107th Ave N, Naples, FL 34108 (13 mi) 9.A.5.c Packet Pg. 1392 Attachment: GMPA Application - Whole Package (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) Iglesia Pentecostes Peniel Church GMPA (PL20190001333) Golden Gate Area Master Plan Page 2 of 7 800 Harbour Drive, Suite 2C, Naples, FL 34103 • (O) 239-649-1551 • (F) 239-649-7112 info@rdafl.com • www.rdafl.com Property Availability Due to the specific nature of the proposed church building, minimum criteria and constraints have been established in defining potential available sites. The key criteria for site development are shown below: • Minimum 5 acres in size • Maximum 7.5 acres in size • A maximum of 10 miles east of Interstate 75, north of Golden Gate Pkwy within Collier County • Located within 1 mile of an Arterial or Collector road • Sale Price of less than or equal to $40,000.00 per acre • Not located on a drainage canal In making the decision to proceed with the subject site (+/-5.15-acre property), all viable sites that are available were reviewed and discussed. Due to the limited amount of undeveloped properties meeting the criteria (including local PUD’s with the church use permitted), few options existed. Please reference the enclosed Available Properties Map, Exhibit F, for a location map. Available properties are as follows: s Option #1 Folio Number(s): 37541600000 Address/Legal Description: 680 16th Ave NW, Naples, FL 34120 Parcel Size: 5.00 Acres Zoning: Estates (E) Current Sale Price: $165,000 (as of 02/12/2020) The site is located on the south side of 16th Ave NW, generally 0.8 miles west of the intersection of Wilson Blvd N and 16th Ave N. Reference the location map provided within Exhibit F. Option #2 Folio Number(s): 37596440008 Address/Legal Description: GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 20 TR 98 Parcel Size: 5.00 Acres Zoning: Estates (E) Current Sale Price: $199,000 (as of 02/12/2020) The site is located on the north side of 22nd Ave N, approximately 0.35 miles west of the intersection of Wilson Blvd N and 22nd Ave NW. Reference the location map provided within Exhibit F. 9.A.5.c Packet Pg. 1393 Attachment: GMPA Application - Whole Package (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) Iglesia Pentecostes Peniel Church GMPA (PL20190001333) Golden Gate Area Master Plan Page 3 of 7 800 Harbour Drive, Suite 2C, Naples, FL 34103 • (O) 239-649-1551 • (F) 239-649-7112 info@rdafl.com • www.rdafl.com Option #3 Folio Number(s): 38501000005 Address/Legal Description: 3GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 36 TR 23 OR 1264 PG 1190 Parcel Size: 5.30 Acres Zoning: Estates (E) Current Sale Price: $280,000 (as of 02/12/2020) The site is located on the northeast corner of the intersection of Wilson Blvd N and 33rd Ave NE. The site is located approximately 1.25 miles north of Immokalee Rd. Reference the location map provided within Exhibit F. Alternative Site Analysis To further identify a need for the Future Land Use Element and Map Designation amendment of the subject property, an alternative site analysis was completed. The analysis was based on the currently available properties, the locational and dimensional features of the subject properties, along with the required zoning designations required for future development of the proposed church use. The following criteria identify the unique features associated with the subject property to perform a data and analysis review required to support the Growth Management Plan Amendment (GMPA). Within the analysis, the subject property (+/- 5.15 acres) and the alternative options were evaluated by their consistency with the following criteria: • Minimum size of 5 acres • Maximum size of 7.5 acres • A maximum of 10 miles east of Interstate 75, north of Golden Gate Pkwy within Collier County • Located within 1 mile of an Arterial or Collector road • Sale Price of less than or equal to $40,000.00 per acre • Not located on a drainage canal These specific criteria were determined in order to identify alternative sites that may be similar to the proposed property to develop and operate the proposed church use. The property acreage and property dimensions have been chosen to ensure the proposed church will be able to provide the same, or better, net developable area the master concept plan illustrates for the proposed church building and associated infrastructure. Per the current Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy, a survey was conducted regarding the allowance of additional conditional uses in the Rural Estates. Most individuals polled that additional conditional uses should be allowed at more locations within the Rural Estates, and specifically near arterial intersections. Therefore, the locality of the site near an arterial or collector roadway specifically identifies a location that is compatible with the present Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy. Please refer to the Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy included in Exhibit G. Additionally, the location near an arterial and/or collector road will provide the proposed church with increased vehicular access by comparison to those sites without access to major roadways. By defining the area of development east of Interstate 75 and north of Golden Gate Parkway within Collier County, a site can be identified that will benefit the existing parishioners commute to the proposed church and defines an area that meets the requests of the church. 9.A.5.c Packet Pg. 1394 Attachment: GMPA Application - Whole Package (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) Iglesia Pentecostes Peniel Church GMPA (PL20190001333) Golden Gate Area Master Plan Page 4 of 7 800 Harbour Drive, Suite 2C, Naples, FL 34103 • (O) 239-649-1551 • (F) 239-649-7112 info@rdafl.com • www.rdafl.com An additional criterion of cost per acre was analyzed. It was determined to be a critical component to determining the available properties as the church operates as a non-for-profit business. Places of worship, specifically the Iglesia Pentecostes Peniel church, do not generate an income that provides the church with a profit. Therefore, affordability of available property to the church is essential. In making the decision to proceed with future development of the subject property, all viable sites that are currently available on the market were reviewed. It is assumed that all undeveloped and/or cleared properties adhere to the criteria of availability with the addition of a Multiple Listing Search (MLS) for properties meeting the identified requirements. Due to the limited amount of available properties, few alternative options exist. Proposed Site Location: Folios #’s: 37750560106 & 37750560009 Address/Legal: GOLDEN GATE ESTATES UNIT 23 TR 133, LESS E 350 FT. & GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 23 E 350 FT OF TR 133. Parcel Size: 5.15 Acres Zoning: Estates (E) The proposed site is owned by the applicant. It is currently zoned Estates. Currently, the site is consistent with the Future Land Use Element (FLUE). Upon the successful completion of this GMPA application, the proposed church land use will be found consistent and permitted within the Subdistrict and subsequent zoning. As noted above, in order to develop the property for a church use the applicant is required to file a GMPA and a companion Conditional Use application for the property. The GMPA’s intent is to justify and permit the proposed land use at this location based on a through data analysis. A Conditional Use application will be necessary to develop the site for the church’s facility. This site meets all of the stated criteria and is further justified by the data analysis. Alternate Site Locations: Alternate Site #1: Address: 680 16th Ave NW, Naples, FL 34120 Folio #: 37541600000 Parcel Size: 5.00 Acres Zoning: Estates (E) The property is currently zoned Estates with a lot width of approximately 330 linear feet and acreage of 5.0 acres available for development. This parcel is currently void of any development, is vegetated, and was identified through an MLS search as an available property. This location is located approximately 4,300 feet down 16th Ave NW, a dead-end road. Due to the location, this site would not provide the proposed church visibility as it is near the end of a dead-end residential road. It could be said that this location meets all of the identified criteria, based on the property acreage, the location of the site to an arterial or collector roadway, and the current sale price. However, to develop the site as proposed, the 9.A.5.c Packet Pg. 1395 Attachment: GMPA Application - Whole Package (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) Iglesia Pentecostes Peniel Church GMPA (PL20190001333) Golden Gate Area Master Plan Page 5 of 7 800 Harbour Drive, Suite 2C, Naples, FL 34103 • (O) 239-649-1551 • (F) 239-649-7112 info@rdafl.com • www.rdafl.com property would also require a GMPA and Conditional Use Rezone. Additionally, the site appears be have wetlands that cover a majority of the property. The mitigation from the large wetland area would be costly to the church and they would not be able to absorb these costs. When compared to the proposed site location for compatibility and consistency with the determined criteria, the subject site provides more site accessibility and cost-efficiency to develop per the wants and needs of the church. In addition, the proposed site better fits the integrity of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan in reference to conditional use properties within the Golden Gate area. Alternate Site #2: Legal Description: GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 20 TR 98 Folio #: 37596440008 Parcel Size: 5.00 Acres Zoning: Estates (E) The property is currently zoned Estates with a lot width of approximately 330 linear feet and acreage of 5.0 acres available for development. This parcel is currently void of any development, is heavily vegetated, and was identified through an MLS search as an available property. This location is located approximately 1,600 feet down 22nd Ave NW, a dead-end road. Due to the alternate site’s location, this site would not provide the proposed church visibility as it is on the north side of a end of a dead-end residential road. This location meets most of the identified criteria, but the sales price is at the maximum considered range for the church at $40,000.00 per acre. This alternate site will also have the additional costs of developing a property with large areas of wetlands. According to the US Fish and Wildlife service National Wetlands Inventory, this site may be approximately covered 85% with wetlands. When comparing this alternate site to the proposed site, it has been determined that the proposed property better fits the needs and wants of the church while also being a more cost-effective property. In addition, the proposed site better fits the integrity of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan in reference to conditional use properties within the Golden Gate area. Alternate Site #3: Legal Description: 3GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 36 TR 23 OR 1264 PG 1190 Folio #: 38501000005 Parcel Size: 5.30 Acres Zoning: Estates (E) The property is currently zoned Estates with property frontage along both 33rd Ave NE and Wilson Blvd N. The alternate property is approximate 5.30 acres with 350 feet of frontage along 33rd Ave NE and 650 feet of frontage along Wilson Blvd N. 9.A.5.c Packet Pg. 1396 Attachment: GMPA Application - Whole Package (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) Iglesia Pentecostes Peniel Church GMPA (PL20190001333) Golden Gate Area Master Plan Page 6 of 7 800 Harbour Drive, Suite 2C, Naples, FL 34103 • (O) 239-649-1551 • (F) 239-649-7112 info@rdafl.com • www.rdafl.com This location is located approximately 4,000 feet down 33rd Ave NE and on the corner of 33rd Ave NE and Wilson Blvd N. 33rd Ave NE is a residential and low traffic volume road. Due to the alternate site’s location, this site would not provide the church visibility as it is away from a main intersection and on the north side on a low volume residential road. This location meets most of the identified criteria, but the sale price is over the maximum of $40,000.00 per acre at approximately $52,800 per acre. Due to this criterion alone, the church congregation has decided that this property would not be suitable for the proposed church location. 9.A.5.c Packet Pg. 1397 Attachment: GMPA Application - Whole Package (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) Iglesia Pentecostes Peniel Church GMPA (PL20190001333) Golden Gate Area Master Plan Page 7 of 7 800 Harbour Drive, Suite 2C, Naples, FL 34103 • (O) 239-649-1551 • (F) 239-649-7112 info@rdafl.com • www.rdafl.com Alternative Site Analysis Table CRITERIA PROPOSED SITE LOCATION (FOLIO’S 37750560106 & 37750560009) ALT. SITE 1 (37541600000) ALT. SITE 2 (37596440008) ALT. SITE 3 (38501000005) PROPERTY SIZE OF 5- 7.5 ACRES +/- 5.15 ACRES +/- 5.00 ACRES +/- 5.00 ACRES +/- 5.30 ACRES SALE PRICE LESS THAN OR EQUAL TO $40,000 PER ACRE SALES PRICE - $31,000 PER ACRE SALES PRICE - $33,000 PER ACRE SALES PRICE - $40,000 PER ACRE SALES PRICE - $52,800 PER ACRE LOCATED WITHIN 1 MILE OF AN ARTERIAL OR COLLECTOR ROAD YES YES YES YES MAXIMUM 10 MILES EAST OF I-75, NORTH OF GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY, AND WITHIN COLLIER COUNTY YES YES YES YES LOCATED ON A DRAINAGE CANAL/WATERFRONT NO NO NO NO 9.A.5.c Packet Pg. 1398 Attachment: GMPA Application - Whole Package (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) Page 1 of 1 800 Harbour Drive, Suite 2C, Naples, FL 34103 • (O) 239-649-1551 • (F) 239-649-7112 info@rdafl.com • www.rdafl.com Iglesia Pentecostes Peniel Church GMPA (PL20190001333) Golden Gate Area Master Plan Exhibit A – Professional Consultants Planning/Project Management: Ronny De Aza, P.E. RDA Consulting Engineers 800 Harbour Drive, Suite #2C Naples, FL 34135 (O) 239-649-1551 (F) 239-649-7112 RonnyDeAza@RDAFL.com Transportation: James M. Banks, P.E. JMB Transportation Engineering, Inc. 4711 7th Avenue SW Naples, FL 34119 239-919-2767 Jmbswte@msn.com Environmental: Jeremy Boone Earth Tech Environmental, LLC 10600 Jolea Avenue, Bonita Springs, FL 34135 (O) 239-304-0030 Jeremyb@eteflorida.com 9.A.5.c Packet Pg. 1399 Attachment: GMPA Application - Whole Package (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) © 2019 Microsoft Corporation © 2019 DigitalGlobe ©CNES (2019) Distrib 24TH AVENUE NE20TH AVENUE NE500 FOOTRADIUS22ND AVENUE NE(COUNTY ROW)8TH STREET NE (COUNTY ROW)SUBJECTPROPERTYZONING: EUSE: RESIDENTIALZONING: E USE: RESIDENTIAL ZONING: EUSE: RESIDENTIALZONING: EUSE: RESIDENTIALPROJECT NO.:IGLESIA PENTECOSTES PENIEL - GOLDEN GATESURROUNDING ZONING & USE MAPSHEET:RDA CONSULTING ENGINEERS800 HARBOUR DRIVE, SUITE #2CNAPLES, FL 34103PHONE: (239) 649-1551FAX: (239) 649-7112WWW.RDAFL.COM1RDA1908400400'200'SCALE: 1" = 400'NSUBJECT ZONING INFORMATIONSUBJECT PROPERTY = 5.15 ACRESEXISTING ZONING = ESTATES (E)EXISTING FLUE = GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLANEXISTING USE = VEGETATED / UNCLEAREDADJACENT PROPERTIES:NORTH ZONING = ESTATES (E) USE = RESIDENTIALSOUTH ZONING = ESTATES (E) USE = VEGETATED / UNCLEAREDEAST ZONING = ESTATES (E) USE = RESIDENTIALWEST ZONING = ESTATES (E) USE = RESIDENTIAL9.A.5.cPacket Pg. 1400Attachment: GMPA Application - Whole Package (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) Z:\PROJECTS\RDA-2019\RDA19084 - IGLESIA PENTECOSTES PENIEL - SDP - JORGE MARTIN\01 - AUTOCAD\REV00\PROPOSED GGAMP MAP.DWG 10/4/2019 11:01 AMIGLESIA PENTECOSTES PENIEL - GOLDEN GATEEXHIBIT D - PROPOSED FUTURE LAND USE MAPRDA CONSULTING ENGINEERS800 HARBOUR DRIVE, SUITE 2CNAPLES, FLORIDA 34103PHONE: (239) 649-1551FAX: (239) 649-7112WWW.RDAFL.COMPROJECT #:RDA19084PROJECT SITEAREA = 5.15 ACRES9.A.5.cPacket Pg. 1401Attachment: GMPA Application - Whole Package (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) Page 1 of 2 800 Harbour Drive, Suite 2C, Naples, FL 34103 • (O) 239-649-1551 • (F) 239-649-7112 info@rdafl.com • www.rdafl.com Iglesia Pentecostes Peniel Church GMPA (PL20190001333) Golden Gate Area Master Plan Exhibit E – Public Facilities Level of Service Analysis Provide the existing Level of Service Standard (LOS) and document the impact the proposed change will have on the following public facilities: Potable Water: The property will be serviced by a private onsite potable water well. Fire suppression will also be provided via an onsite private well. Sanitary Sewer: The subject property will be serviced by a private onsite sanitary sewer septic tank and field. Arterial and Collector Roads: Please refer to the Traffic Impact Statement prepared by JMB Transportation, Inc. for discussions of the project’s impact on level of service for arterial and collector roadways within the project’s radius of development influence. Drainage: The County has adopted a LOS standard for private developments which require development to occur consistent with water quantity and quality standards established in Ordinances 74-50, 90-10, 2001-27, and LDC Ordinance 2004-41, as may be amended. The proposed project will be designed to meet all Collier County and SFWMD design criteria. This project will be permitted through both Collier County and SFWMD (or FDEP 10/2, if possible). Solid Waste: Per Collier County LDC, the adopted LOS for solid waste is two years of lined cell capacity at the previous 3 year average tons per year disposal rate and 10 years of permittable landfill capacity of the disposal rate. The proposed project will adhere to the requirements outlined in the Collier County Land Development Code. The solid waste requirements will be outlined during the SDP application process. Parks, Community and Regional: The proposed church will pay park impact fees to mitigate for their impacts on this public facility. No adverse impacts to community or regional parks will result from the creation of the subdistrict. Schools: The proposed church will pay school impact fees, if necessary, to mitigate for their impacts. No adverse impacts to schools will result from the creation of this subdistrict. 9.A.5.c Packet Pg. 1402 Attachment: GMPA Application - Whole Package (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) Page 2 of 2 800 Harbour Drive, Suite 2C, Naples, FL 34103 • (O) 239-649-1551 • (F) 239-649-7112 info@rdafl.com • www.rdafl.com Iglesia Pentecostes Peniel Church GMPA (PL20190001333) Golden Gate Area Master Plan Public Facilities Level of Service Analysis Fire Control and EMS: The proposed church project lies with the North Collier Fire and Rescue District. No significant impacts to the fire control level of service are anticipated due to the proposed project. Estimated impact fees for EMS and fire service will be determined at the time of SDP application based on the proposed building. Sheriff, Fire Protection, and EMS services location / address of the facilities intended to serve the project are as follows: North Collier Fire and Rescue District Station #10 13240 Immokalee Road Naples, FL 34120 Collier County Sheriff Office 3319 Tamiami Trail E Naples, FL 34112 Collier County Sheriff Office District Four Substation 14750 Immokalee Road Naples, FL 34120 9.A.5.c Packet Pg. 1403 Attachment: GMPA Application - Whole Package (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) IGLESIA PENTECOSTES PENIEL CHURCH GMPA & CUEXHIBIT F - AVAILABLE ALTERNATIVE PROPERTIESRDA CONSULTING ENGINEERS800 HARBOUR DRIVE, SUITE 210NAPLES, FLORIDA 34103PHONE: (239) 649-1551FAX: (239) 649-7112WWW.RDAFL.COMPROJECT #:RDA19084PAGE:1DATE:03/2020IMMOKALEE RDVANDERBILT BEACHPINE RIDGE RDGOLDEN GATE PKWY385010000053759644000837541600000CR 951 GOLDEN GATE BLVDI-75 I-75 IMMOKALEE RD LEGENDDATA ANALYSIS AREADATA ANALYSIS AREADATA ANALYSIS AREADATA ANALYSIS AREASUBJECT PROPERTYAVAILABLE ALTERNATIVE PROPERTIESSUBJECTPROPERTY9.A.5.cPacket Pg. 1404Attachment: GMPA Application - Whole Package (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) Ig l esia Pen tecostes Pen i el Adjacent Congres s ional Mem bers within 2 Miles 2 mi N➤➤N © 2018 Google © 2018 Google © 2018 Google 9.A.5.c Packet Pg. 1405 Attachment: GMPA Application - Whole Package (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Ig l esia Pen tecostes Pen i el Adjacent Congres s ional Mem bers within 5 Miles 4 mi N➤➤N © 2018 Google © 2018 Google © 2018 Google 9.A.5.c Packet Pg. 1406 Attachment: GMPA Application - Whole Package (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias IGLESIA PENTECOSTES PENIEL CHURCH GMPA & CUEXHIBIT I - EXISTING ADJACENT PENTECOSTES CHURCHESNRDA CONSULTING ENGINEERS800 HARBOUR DRIVE, SUITE 210NAPLES, FLORIDA 34103PHONE: (239) 649-1551FAX: (239) 649-7112WWW.RDAFL.COMPROJECT #:RDA19084PAGE:1DATE:03/2020IMMOKALEE RDVANDERBILT BEACHPINE RIDGE RDGOLDEN GATE PKWYCR 951 GOLDEN GATE BLVDI-75 I-75 IMMOKALEE RD LEGENDIGLESIA PENTECOSTES PENIEL(UNDER DIFFERENT PASTOR)757 107TH AVE NNAPLES, FL 34108SUBJECT PROPERTYADJACENT PENTECOSTES CHURCHESSUBJECTPROPERTYIGLESIA CHRISTIANA PENTECOSTES6028 RADIO ROADNAPLES, FL 34104EXISTING CHURCH LOCATION(WILL BE RELOCATED TO THE PROPOSED SITE)13260 IMMOKALEE ROADNAPLES, FL 34120I-75RADIO RDIMMOKALEE RD9.A.5.cPacket Pg. 1407Attachment: GMPA Application - Whole Package (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) LAST REVISION: ZONING ___________________ OTHER ___________________SUBDIVISON INDEX ATTEST___________________________CLERK COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA TWP 48S RNG 27E SEC(S) 27 & 28 MAP NUMBER: BY___________________________CHAIRMAN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIVISION 26 24 23 22 20 19 18 12 11 10 98 7 6 5 1 2 1 117 116IMMOKALEE R O A D (C .R . 8 4 6 ) 92 89 88 24TH AVENUE N.W. 22ND AVENUE N.W. 20TH AVENUE N.W. 18TH AVENUE N.W. 84 83 82 81 80 79 78 77 U20 68 67 66 65 64 63 62 6160 59 58 57 56 55 54 5352 51 50 49 48 47 46 4544 43 42 41 40 39 38 3736 35 34 33 32 31 30 29 76 75 74 73 72 71 70 69 JUNG BOULEVARD 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 28 27 26 25 24 23 22 21 25 21 17 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 16141140 139 138 137 136 135 134 133 132 131 130 129 128 127 126 125 124 123 122 121 120 119 118115 114 113 112 111 110 109 WILSON BOULEVARD100 99 98 97 96 95 94 93 91 90 87 86 85 108 107 106 105 104 103 102 101 C A N A L 53 1273536 116 115 114 113 112 111 110 109 108 24TH AVENUE N.E. 22ND AV ENUE N.E . 20TH AVENUE N.E. 18TH AVENUE N.E. 107 106 105 104 103 102 101 100 99 89 88 87 86 85 84 83 82 8180 79 78 77 76 75 74 73 7271 70 69 68 67 66 65 64 6362 61 60 59 58 57 56 55 54 52 51 50 49 48 47 46 45 CANALU23 98 97 96 95 94 93 92 91 90 JUNG BOULEVARD 44 43 42 41 40 39 3734 33 32 31 30 29 28 27 38 8TH STREET N.E.E 125 124 123 122 121 120 119 118 117 143 142 141 140 139 138 137 136 135 134 133 132 131 130 129 1283,7,101PU PUDPU 2 RANDALL BLVD126 RANDALL BOULEVARD 28 4,10PUDMIR-MARCU5 CENTER(S)LOT 13 3CANAL28 28 28 27 27 27 27 26 3534 26 2 22 1 1 2 1 1 V 6 8,9CU ST/W-1 11 ST/W-4 11 ST/W-4 11 ST/W-4 11 ST/W-4 11 ST/W-2 11 ST/W-3 11 ST/W-3 11 ST/W-1 11 ST/W-2 11 ST/W-3 11 ST/W-3 114 4 23 5 5 5 5 LOT1LOT2LOT3LOT4 $NO. NAME P.B. Pg.1 GOLDEN GATE ESTATES UNIT 20 7 79, 802 GOLDEN GATE ESTATES UNIT 23 7 9, 103 UNIT 20, TR 25 REPLAT 20 64 TRACT 3, GOLDEN GATE ESTATES, UNIT NO. 20 REPLAT 62 225 TRACT 4, GOLDEN GATE ESTATES, UNIT NO. 20 REPLAT 64 80678910 GGE04B GGE04D872930 GGE04CGGE04A The Historic/Archaeological Probability Maps are the officialCounty source designating historic or archaeologic resources.ZONING NOTES1 12-23-86 PU-86-202 9-16-86 PU-86-12C3 6-17-86 R-86-3 86-254 9-8-98 PUD-98-4 98-725 3-13-01 CU-00-17 01-806 10-14-03 V-03-AR-4243 03-3507 3-15-04 SUNSETTED8 4-26-05 CU-04-AR-6090 05-1719 6-10-08 CUE-08-AR-12816 08-17210 4-14-09 ZLTRA-09-AR-14174 09-9911 9-25-12 LDC ORD. 12-38NO. NAME P.B. Pg.11121314151617181920 THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A PAGE OF THEOFFICIAL ZONING ATLAS REFERRED TO AND ADOPTEDBY REFERENCE BY ORDINANCE NO. 04-41 OF THECOUNTY OF COLLIER, FLORIDA, ADOPTED JUNE 22, 2004,AS AMENDED BY THE ZONING NOTES AND SUBDIVISIONINDEX REFERENCED HEREON. INDICATES SPECIAL TREATMENT OVERLAY 482728 GGE05C 482728GGE05B 0 800 SCALE9/6/189.A.5.c Packet Pg. 1408 Attachment: GMPA Application - Whole Package (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) 1 inch = 100' ft. GRAPHIC SCALE 9.A.5.c Packet Pg. 1409 Attachment: GMPA Application - Whole Package (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) 1 inch = 100' ft. GRAPHIC SCALE 9.A.5.c Packet Pg. 1410 Attachment: GMPA Application - Whole Package (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) 9.A.5.c Packet Pg. 1411 Attachment: GMPA Application - Whole Package (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) 9.A.5.c Packet Pg. 1412 Attachment: GMPA Application - Whole Package (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) 9.A.5.c Packet Pg. 1413 Attachment: GMPA Application - Whole Package (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) 9.A.5.c Packet Pg. 1414 Attachment: GMPA Application - Whole Package (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) IMMOKALEE PENIEL CHURCH Environmental Data for CU SECTIONS 27, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 27 EAST COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA Prepared For: Prepared By: September 16, 2019 Collier County Growth Management Division 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Earth Tech Environmental, LLC 10600 Jolea Avenue Bonita Springs, FL 34135 239.304.0030 www.eteflorida.com 9.A.5.c Packet Pg. 1415 Attachment: GMPA Application - Whole Package (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) Environmental Data for CU Earth Tech Environmental, LLC www.eteflorida.com EXHIBITS Figure 1 Location Map Figure 2 Aerial FLUCCS Map Figure 3 Existing Native Vegetation Figure 4 Site Plan with Preserve Figure 5 Anticipated SFWMD Jurisdictional Wetlands Figure 6 Florida Black Bear Map APPENDICES APPENDIX A Collier County CU Pre-App Notes APPENDIX B Protected Species Survey APPENDIX C Earth Tech Environmental Staff Qualifications 9.A.5.c Packet Pg. 1416 Attachment: GMPA Application - Whole Package (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) Environmental Data for CU Earth Tech Environmental, LLC www.eteflorida.com INTRODUCTION The purpose of this document is to satisfy the Environmental Data requirements (LDC Section 3.08.00) for a Conditional Use (CU) to the Immokalee Peniel Church parcel (Subject Property). This information is in response to the items in the CU Pre-Application Notes as provided by Collier County (see Appendix A). PROPERTY LOCATION The Subject Property for this report consists of two (2) adjacent parcels (Folio #’s 37750560106 & 37750560009). The Subject Property is located on the north side of 22nd Ave NE and immediately west of 8th St NE in Collier County. According to the Collier County Property Appraiser’s website, the Subject Property’s combined acreage is approximately 5.15 acres. See Figure 1 below for a location map. Figure 1. Location Map 3 9.A.5.c Packet Pg. 1417 Attachment: GMPA Application - Whole Package (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) Environmental Data for CU Earth Tech Environmental, LLC www.eteflorida.com ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST- CONDITIONAL USE See page 7 of Collier County Pre-App Notes 1. Is the project in compliance with the overlays, districts and/or zoning on the subject site and/or the surrounding properties? (CON, ST, PUD, RLSA, RFMU, etc.) (LDC 2.03.05-2.03.08; 4.08.00) Not in CV Library The project will be a GMPA and will be in compliance with zoning. 2. Submit a current aerial photograph (available from the Property Appraiser’s office) and clearly delineate the subject site boundary lines. If the site is vegetated, provide FLUCFCS overlay and vegetation inventory identifying upland, wetland and exotic vegetation (Admin. Code Ch. 3 G. 1. Application Contents #24). FLUCCS Overlay -P627 See Figure 2, Aerial FLUCCS Map and vegetation descriptions below. Figure 2. Aerial FLUCCS Map 4 9.A.5.c Packet Pg. 1418 Attachment: GMPA Application - Whole Package (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) Environmental Data for CU Earth Tech Environmental, LLC www.eteflorida.com Figure 3. Existing Native Vegetation Based on the FLUCCS classification system, the following communities are present on the property: FLUCCS CODE DESCRIPTION ACREAGE 411-E1 Pine Flatwoods (<25% Exotics) 3.51 624- E2 Cypress – Pine – Cabbage Palm (26-50% Exotics) 0.81 814 Roadway 0.82 Site Total: 5.15 E1 = Exotics <25% of total cover E2 = Exotics 26-50% of total cover E3 = Exotics 51-75% of total cover E4 = Exotics >75% of total cover FLUCCS 411-E1, Pine Flatwoods (<25% Exotics) This community comprises the majority of the property. Canopy vegetation consists mostly of slash pine (Pinus elliottii) and scattered cabbage palm (Sabal palmetto). The mid-story is sparse, largely containing saw palmetto with lesser amounts of gallberry (Ilex glabra), rusty staggerbush (Lyonia fruticosa), and winged sumac (Rhus copallinum). The groundcover is largely covered by a dense blanket of grapevine (Vitis rotundifolia), lovevine (Cassytha filiformis), and a thick layer pine needles. Exotic coverage is relatively low with the ecotone displaying higher abundances of Brazilian pepper (Schinus terebinthifolia). 5 9.A.5.c Packet Pg. 1419 Attachment: GMPA Application - Whole Package (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) Environmental Data for CU Earth Tech Environmental, LLC www.eteflorida.com FLUCCS 624-E2, Cypress – Pine – Cabbage Palm (26-50% Exotics) This community is found on the southeast portion of the property. It is dominated by large cypress (Taxodium distichum), cabbage palm, and sparse slash pine in the canopy. The mid-story is dominated by dense Brazilian pepper with lesser amounts of myrsine (Myrsine cubana) and cabbage palm. Groundcover contains minimal diversity and consists primarily of swamp fern (Telmatoblechnum serrulatum). Exotic coverage is moderate consisting primarily of dense Brazilian pepper. FLUCCS 814, Roadways Both 8th St NE and 22nd Ave NE along with their associated right-of-way’s are found on the eastern and southern portion of the property. 3. Clearly identify the location of all preserves and label each as “Preserve” on all plans. (LDC 3.05.07.A.2). Preserve Label- P546 See Figure 4 below, Site Plan. Figure 4. Site Plan with Preserve 4. Provide calculations on site plan showing the appropriate acreage of native vegetation to be retained, the max amount and ratios permitted to be created on-site or mitigated off-site. Exclude vegetation located within utility and drainage easements from the preserve calculations (LDC 6 9.A.5.c Packet Pg. 1420 Attachment: GMPA Application - Whole Package (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) Environmental Data for CU Earth Tech Environmental, LLC www.eteflorida.com 3.05.07.B-D; 3.05.07.F; 3.05.07.H 1.d-e). Preserve Calculation – P547. 15% of existing native vegetation to be preserved. The total existing native vegetation on the site is 4.33 acres. The preserve requirement is 15%. 0.15 * 4.33 = 0.65 acres. The proposed site plan currently depicts a 0.81-acre preserve, which exceeds the requirement (preserve setback was NOT included in preserve calculation). See Figures 3 & 4. 5. Created and retained preserve areas shall meet the minimum width requirements per LDC 3.05.07.H.1.b. Preserve Width – P603 See engineer’s plan set. 6. Retained preservation areas shall be selected based on the criteria defined in LDC 3.05.07.A.3, include all 3 strata, be in the largest contiguous area possible and shall be interconnected within the site and adjoining off-site preservation areas or wildlife corridors. (LDC 3.05.07.A.1-4). Preserve Selection- P550 The site is bordered by roads to the south and the east, and residential development to the north and west. The preserve placement was selected based on existing wetlands (the highest quality habitat) on site. See Figures 3 & 4. 7. Principle structures shall be located a minimum of 25’ from the boundary of the preserve boundary. No accessory structures and other site alterations, fill placement, grading, plant alteration or removal, or similar activity shall be permitted within 10’ of the boundary unless it can be shown that it will not affect the integrity of the preserve (i.e. stem wall or berm around the wetland preserve). Provide cross-sections for each preserve boundary identifying all site alterations within 25’. (LDC 3.05.07.H.3; 6.01.02.C.). Preserve Setback – New See engineer’s plan set. 8. Wildlife survey required for sites where EIS in not required, when so warranted. (LDC 10.02.02.A.2.f) See Appendix B, Protected Species Survey. 9. Provide Environmental Data identifying author credentials, consistency determination with GMPs, off-site preserves, seasonal and historic high-water levels, and analysis of water quality. For land previously used for farm fields or golf course, provide soil sampling/groundwater monitoring reports identifying any site contamination. (LDC 3.08.00) Environmental Data Required – P 522 See Appendix C, ETE Staff Qualifications for author credentials. 10. Master Plan shall state the minimum acreage required to be preserved. (LDC 10.02.13.A.2) Master Plan Contents-P626. With Calculations. See engineer’s plan set. 7 9.A.5.c Packet Pg. 1421 Attachment: GMPA Application - Whole Package (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) Environmental Data for CU Earth Tech Environmental, LLC www.eteflorida.com ENVIRONMENTAL DATA CHECKLIST – The environmental data requirements can be found in LDC section 3.08.00 See Pages 8-10 of Collier County Pre-App Notes 1. Provide the EIS fee if PUD or CU. Fee will be provided upon submittal. 2. WHO AND WHAT COMPANY PREPARED THE ENVIRONMENTAL DATA REPORT? Preparation of Environmental Data. Environmental Data Submittal Requirements shall be prepared by an individual with academic credentials and experience in the area of environmental sciences or natural resource management. Academic credentials and experience shall be a bachelor's or higher degree in one of the biological sciences with at least two years of ecological or biological professional experience in the State of Florida. See Appendix C, ETE Staff Qualifications for author credentials. 3. Identify on a current aerial, the location and acreage of all SFWMD jurisdictional wetlands according to the Florida Land Use Cover and Forms Classification System (FLUCFCS) and include this information on the SOP or final plat construction plans. Wetlands must be verified by the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) or Florida Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) prior to SDP or final plat construction plans approval. For sites in the RFMU district, provide an assessment in accordance with 3.05.07 F and identify on the FLUCFCS map the location of all high quality wetlands (wetlands having functionality scores of at least 0.65 WRAP or 0.7 UMAM) and their location within the proposed development plan. Sites with high quality wetlands must have their functionality scores have not been verified by either the SFWMD or DEP, scores must be reviewed and accepted by County staff, consistent with State regulation. See Figure 5, Anticipated SFWMD Jurisdictional Wetlands map and vegetation descriptions above. 8 9.A.5.c Packet Pg. 1422 Attachment: GMPA Application - Whole Package (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) Environmental Data for CU Earth Tech Environmental, LLC www.eteflorida.com Figure 5. Anticipated SFWMD Jurisdictional Wetlands 7. Provide a wildlife survey for the nests of bald eagle and for listed species known to inhabit biological communities similar to those existing on site. The survey shall be conducted in accordance with the guidelines or recommendations of the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FFWCC) and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). Survey times may be reduced or waived where an initial habitat assessment by the environmental consultant indicates that the likelihood of listed species occurrence is low, as determined by the FFWCC and USFWS. Where an initial habitat assessment by the environmental consultant indicates that the likelihood of listed species occurrence is low, the survey time may be reduced or waived by the County Manager or designee, when the project is not reviewed, or technical assistance not provided by the FFWCC and USFWS. Additional survey time may be required if listed species are discovered. Please include review for bonneted bat. See Appendix B, Protected Species Survey. The Subject Property falls within the Florida Bonneted Bat (FBB) Consultation Area and FBB Focal Area. During the species survey, no potential bat cavities were observed. The 5.15-acre property is surrounded by development on all sides. Prior to any development or permitting activities, the US Fish & Wildlife Service (USFWS) may require acoustic surveys to further determine presence or absence of FBB roosts or foraging on the property. 8. Provide a survey for listed plants identified in 3 .04.03 9 9.A.5.c Packet Pg. 1423 Attachment: GMPA Application - Whole Package (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) Environmental Data for CU Earth Tech Environmental, LLC www.eteflorida.com See Appendix B, Protected Species Survey. Common wild pine (Tillandsia fasciculata) and butterfly orchids (Encyclia tampensis) were observed on the Subject Property. Typically, individual plants are relocated from proposed impact areas into onsite (or offsite) preserves prior to construction. 9. Wildlife habitat management and monitoring plans in accordance with 3.04.00 shall be required where listed species are utilizing the site or where wildlife habitat management and monitoring plans are required by the FFWCC or USFWS. These plans shall describe how the project directs incompatible land uses away from listed species and their habitats. Identify the location of listed species nests, burrows, dens, foraging areas, and the location of any bald eagle nests or nest protection zones on the native vegetation aerial with FLU CFCS overlay for the site. Wildlife habitat management plans shall be included on the SDP or final plat construction plans. Bald eagle management plans are required for sites containing bald eagle nests or nest protection zones, copies of which shall be included on the SDP or final plat construction plans. Include review for black bear activity in and around the subject property and provide exhibit. A Panther Mitigation Analysis and Wood Stork Foraging Analysis will be provided during permitting, if warranted. The property falls within the FWC mapped range for Florida black Bear. Telemetry points from tagged bears have been documented on and in the vicinity of the Subject Property. See Figure 6 for black bear mappings as they relate to the Subject Property. The County may require the Client to implement FWC-approved bear-proof waste receptacles on the property. Figure 6. Florida Black Bear Information 10 9.A.5.c Packet Pg. 1424 Attachment: GMPA Application - Whole Package (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) Environmental Data for CU Earth Tech Environmental, LLC www.eteflorida.com 10. Identify on a current aerial the acreage, location and community types of all upland and wetland habitats on the project site, according to the Florida Land Use Cover and Forms Classification System (FLUCFCS) and provide a legend for each of the FLUCFCS Codes identified. Aerials and overlay information must be legible at the scale provided. Provide calculations for the acreage of native vegetation required to be retained on-site. Include the above referenced calculations and aerials on the SDP or final plat construction plans. In a separate report, demonstrate how the preserve selection criteria pursuant to 3.05.07 have been met. Where applicable, include in this report an aerial showing the project boundaries along with any undeveloped land, preserves, natural flowways or other natural land features, located on abutting properties. See Figures 2 & 5 above. 14. Provide justification for deviations from environmental LDC provisions pursuant to GMP CCME Policy 6.1.1 (13), if requested. N/A 16. Identify any Wellfield Risk Management Special Treatment Overlay Zones (WRM-ST) within the project area and provide an analysis for how the project design avoids the most intensive land uses within the most sensitive WRM-STs and will comply with the WRM-ST pursuant to 3.06.00. Include the location of the Wellfield Risk Management Special Treatment Overlay Zones on the SDP or final plat construction plans. For land use applications such as standard and PUD rezones and CUs, provide a separate site plan or zoning map with the project boundary and Wellfield Risk Management Special Treatment Overlay Zones identified. Clearly provide info regarding which WRM-ST zone property is located. N/A 17. Demonstrate that the design of the proposed Stormwater management system and analysis of water quality and quantity impacts fully incorporate the requirements of the Watershed Management Regulations of 3.07.00. See engineer’s plan set. 20. The County Manager or designee may require additional data or information necessary to evaluate the project’s compliance with LDC and GMP requirements. (LDC 10.02.02.A.3 f) a. Provide overall description of project with respect to environmental and water management issues. See this document. b. Explain how project is consistent with each of the applicable objectives and policies in the CCME of the GMP. See below. 11 9.A.5.c Packet Pg. 1425 Attachment: GMPA Application - Whole Package (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) Environmental Data for CU Earth Tech Environmental, LLC www.eteflorida.com c.Explain how the project meets or exceeds the native vegetation preservation requirements in the CCME and LDC. See Figure 3, Site Plan and native vegetation/preserve narrative above. d.Indicate wetlands to be impacted and the effects of the impact to their functions and how the project’s design compensates for wetland impacts. Address each one. See Figure 5, Wetland Map above. The wetlands will be preserved; no wetland impacts are associated with the project. e.Indicate how the project design minimizes impacts to listed species. Describe the measures that are proposed as mitigation for impacts to listed species. The preserve is designed on the wetland to reduce impacts to listed species. See Appendix B - Protected Species Survey. CCME GOAL 6: TO IDENTIFY, PROTECT, CONSERVE AND APPROPRIATELY USE NATIVE VEGETATIVE COMMUNITIES AND WILDLIFE HABITAT. OBJECTIVE 6.1: Protect native vegetative communities through the application of minimum preservation requirements… Per Collier County, the native vegetation requirement is 15%. The project is proposing to preserve 0.81 acres. See Figure 4 above. The total existing native vegetation on the site is 4.33 acres. The preserve requirement is 15%. 0.15 * 4.33 = 0.65 acres. The proposed site plan currently depicts 0.81 acres preserve. See Figure 4. No wetland impacts are occurring onsite, so no mitigation is required. All onsite wetlands will be preserved. CCME GOAL 7: TO PROTECT AND CONSERVE THE COUNTY’S FISHERIES AND WILDLIFE. OBJECTIVE 7.1: Direct incompatible land uses are directed away from listed species and their habitats… No listed species have been identified on the Subject Property. See Appendix B, Protected Species Survey. A Panther Mitigation Analysis and Wood Stork Foraging Analysis will be provided during permitting, if warranted. The property falls within the FWC mapped range for Florida black Bear. Telemetry points from tagged bears have been documented on and in the vicinity of the Subject Property. See Figure 5 for black bear mappings as they relate to the Subject Property. The County may require the Client to implement FWC-approved bear-proof waste receptacles on the property. 12 9.A.5.c Packet Pg. 1426 Attachment: GMPA Application - Whole Package (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) Environmental Data for CU Earth Tech Environmental, LLC www.eteflorida.com APPENDIX A Collier County CU Pre-App Notes 9.A.5.c Packet Pg. 1427 Attachment: GMPA Application - Whole Package (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) 9.A.5.c Packet Pg. 1428 Attachment: GMPA Application - Whole Package (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) 9.A.5.c Packet Pg. 1429 Attachment: GMPA Application - Whole Package (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) 9.A.5.c Packet Pg. 1430 Attachment: GMPA Application - Whole Package (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) 9.A.5.c Packet Pg. 1431 Attachment: GMPA Application - Whole Package (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) 9.A.5.c Packet Pg. 1432 Attachment: GMPA Application - Whole Package (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) 9.A.5.c Packet Pg. 1433 Attachment: GMPA Application - Whole Package (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) 9.A.5.c Packet Pg. 1434 Attachment: GMPA Application - Whole Package (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) 9.A.5.c Packet Pg. 1435 Attachment: GMPA Application - Whole Package (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) 9.A.5.c Packet Pg. 1436 Attachment: GMPA Application - Whole Package (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) 9.A.5.c Packet Pg. 1437 Attachment: GMPA Application - Whole Package (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) 9.A.5.c Packet Pg. 1438 Attachment: GMPA Application - Whole Package (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) 9.A.5.c Packet Pg. 1439 Attachment: GMPA Application - Whole Package (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) 9.A.5.c Packet Pg. 1440 Attachment: GMPA Application - Whole Package (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) 9.A.5.c Packet Pg. 1441 Attachment: GMPA Application - Whole Package (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) 9.A.5.c Packet Pg. 1442 Attachment: GMPA Application - Whole Package (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) 9.A.5.c Packet Pg. 1443 Attachment: GMPA Application - Whole Package (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) 9.A.5.c Packet Pg. 1444 Attachment: GMPA Application - Whole Package (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) 9.A.5.c Packet Pg. 1445 Attachment: GMPA Application - Whole Package (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) 9.A.5.c Packet Pg. 1446 Attachment: GMPA Application - Whole Package (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) 9.A.5.c Packet Pg. 1447 Attachment: GMPA Application - Whole Package (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) Environmental Data for CU Earth Tech Environmental, LLC www.eteflorida.com APPENDIX B Protected Species Survey 9.A.5.c Packet Pg. 1448 Attachment: GMPA Application - Whole Package (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) IMMOKALEE PENIEL CHURCH Protected Species Survey SECTIONS 27, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 27 EAST COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 34120 Prepared For: Prepared By: August 23, 2019 RDA Consulting Engineers c/o Richard Dubois 790 Harbour Drive, Suite 2C Naples, FL 34103 Earth Tech Environmental, LLC 10600 Jolea Avenue Bonita Springs, FL 34135 239.304.0030 www.eteflorida.com 9.A.5.c Packet Pg. 1449 Attachment: GMPA Application - Whole Package (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) Protected Species Survey Earth Tech Environmental, LLC www.eteflorida.com TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................................. 3 2.0 PROPERTY LOCATION ................................................................................................................... 3 3.0 SPECIES SURVEY MATERIALS & METHODS ................................................................................... 3 4.0 EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS .......................................................................................................... 4 5.0 RESULTS ...................................................................................................................................... 9 6.0 REFERENCES ................................................................................................................................ 15 EXHIBITS Figure 1 Site Location Map Figure 2 Aerial Map Figure 3 FLUCCS Map with Aerial Figure 4 FLUCCS Map Figure 5 Transect Map & Field Results Figure 6 Florida Bonneted Bat Consultation Area Figure 7 Wood Stork Information Figure 8 Florida Panther Information Figure 9 Black Bear Information 9.A.5.c Packet Pg. 1450 Attachment: GMPA Application - Whole Package (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) Protected Species Survey Earth Tech Environmental, LLC www.eteflorida.com 1.0 INTRODUCTION Earth Tech Environmental (ETE) conducted a search for listed species on the property referred to as the Immokalee Peniel Church parcel (Subject Property) prior to development. This assessment was conducted by ETE on July 24, 2019 to evaluate the Subject Property for the potential presence of listed species of concern based on the determined Florida Land Use Cover and Forms Classification System (FLUCCS) vegetation. 2.0 PROPERTY LOCATION The Subject Property for this report consists of two (2) adjacent parcels (Folio #’s 37750560106 & 37750560009). The Subject Property is located on the north side of 22nd Ave NE and just west of 8th St NE in Collier County. According to the Collier County Property Appraiser’s website, the Subject Property’s combined acreage is approximately 5.15 acres. See Figure 1 below for a location map. Figure 1. Site Location Map 3.0 SPECIES SURVEY MATERIALS & METHODS The species survey was conducted using a methodology similar to that discussed in the Florida Fish & Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC) publication “Ecology and Habitat Protection Needs of Gopher Tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus) Populations Found on Lands Slated for Large-scale Development in Florida.” This methodology is as follows: Existing vegetation communities or land-uses on the subject site are delineated on a recent aerial photograph (Collier County 2019) using the Florida Land Use, Cover and Forms Classification System (FLUCCS). FLUCCS mapping for this property is detailed below in (Figures 3 & 3 9.A.5.c Packet Pg. 1451 Attachment: GMPA Application - Whole Package (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) Protected Species Survey Earth Tech Environmental, LLC www.eteflorida.com 4). The resulting FLUCCS codes are cross-referenced with a list of protected plant and animal species. The lists were obtained from two agency publications: “Florida’s Endangered Species, Threatened Species & Species of Special Concern-Official Lists”, December 2018. “Notes on Florida’s Endangered and Threatened Plants”, Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, 2010. The result is a composite table that contains the names of the protected species which have the highest probability of occurring in each particular FLUCCS community. See Table 3 of this report for the species list that applies to the FLUCCS communities associated with the Subject Property. In the field, each FLUCCS community is searched for listed species or signs of listed species. This is accomplished using a series of transects throughout each vegetation community (see Figure 5). If necessary, transect integrity is maintained using a handheld GPS in track mode. Signs or sightings of all listed and non-listed species are then recorded, which are flagged in the field and marked by GPS. Based on the habitat types found on the Subject Property (see Table 3), particular attention was paid to the presence or absence of listed plant species such as wild pine, twisted air plants, and butterfly orchids. The presence and absence of listed animal species such as Big Cypress fox squirrel, gopher tortoise, Florida bonneted bat, wood stork, and Florida panther were also considered. Approximately four and a half (4.5) man-hours were logged on the Subject Property during this species survey (see Table 1). 4.0 EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS Temperatures during the fieldwork for this survey were in the low 90’s. Cloud cover was absent. The Subject Property is vacant and vegetated, consisting of upland and wetland communities. Moderate exotic vegetation is present throughout the property. The property is surrounded by roads and residential development on all sides. See Figure 2 below for an aerial map. The Subject Property has the following surrounding land uses: North Residential East 8th St NE/Residential South 22nd Ave NE/Vacant Residential West Residential TABLE 1. FIELD TIME SPENT ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY DATE START TIME END TIME NO. ECOLOGISTS MAN HOURS TASK July 24, 2019 1:00 pm 2:30 pm 3 4.5 Species Survey Fieldwork 4 9.A.5.c Packet Pg. 1452 Attachment: GMPA Application - Whole Package (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) Protected Species Survey Earth Tech Environmental, LLC www.eteflorida.com Figure 2. Aerial Map Listed below are the FLUCCS communities identified on the site. The community descriptions correspond to the mappings on the FLUCCS maps below (Figures 3 and 4). See Florida Land Use, Cover and Forms Classification System (Department of Transportation, Surveying & Mapping Geographic Mapping Section, 1999) for definitions. The Florida Exotic Pest Plant Council’s (FLEPPC) list of invasive species contains Category 1 species that may be found on the Subject Property. Category 1 species are invasive exotics that are altering native plant communities by displacing native species, changing community structures or ecological functions, or hybridizing with natives (FLEPPC). A significant factor in mapping vegetative associations and local habitats is the invasion of these species such as Brazilian pepper, ear leaf acacia, melaleuca, Caesar weed, and air potato. Levels of exotic density were mapped by using field observations and photo interpretation as shown in Figure 3. Modifiers, or “E” designators, are appended to the FLUCCS codes to indicate the approximate density of exotics in the canopy and/or sub-canopy. 5 9.A.5.c Packet Pg. 1453 Attachment: GMPA Application - Whole Package (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) Protected Species Survey Earth Tech Environmental, LLC www.eteflorida.com TABLE 2. ACREAGE PER FLUCCS COMMUNITY FLUCCS CODE DESCRIPTION ACREAGE 411-E1 Pine Flatwoods (<25% Exotics) 3.51 624- E2 Cypress – Pine – Cabbage Palm (26-50% Exotics) 0.81 814 Roadway 0.82 Site Total: 5.15 E1 = Exotics <25% of total cover E2 = Exotics 26-50% of total cover E3 = Exotics 51-75% of total cover E4 = Exotics >75% of total cover Figure 3. FLUCCS Map with Aerial 6 9.A.5.c Packet Pg. 1454 Attachment: GMPA Application - Whole Package (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) Protected Species Survey Earth Tech Environmental, LLC www.eteflorida.com Figure 4. FLUCCS Map FLUCCS 411-E1, Pine Flatwoods (<25% Exotics) This community dominates the majority of the property. Canopy vegetation consists mostly of slash pine (Pinus elliottii) and scattered cabbage palm (Sabal palmetto). The mid-story is sparse, largely containing saw palmetto with lesser amounts of gallberry (Ilex glabra), rusty staggerbush (Lyonia fruticosa), and winged sumac (Rhus copallinum). The groundcover is largely covered by a dense blanket of grapevine (Vitis rotundifolia), lovevine (Cassytha filiformis), and a thick layer of pine needles. Exotic coverage is relatively low with the ecotone displaying higher abundances of Brazilian pepper (Schinus terebinthifolia). FLUCCS 624-E2, Cypress – Pine – Cabbage Palm (26-50% Exotics) This community is found on the southeast portion of the property. It is dominated by large cypress (Taxodium distichum), cabbage palm, and sparse slash pine, in the canopy. The mid-story is dominated by dense Brazilian pepper with lesser amounts of myrsine (Myrsine cubana) and cabbage palm. Groundcover contains minimal diversity and consists primarily of swamp fern (Telmatoblechnum serrulatum). Exotic coverage is moderate consisting primarily of dense Brazilian pepper. FLUCCS 814, Roadways This community along the eastern and southern portions of the property and include 8th St NE and 22nd Ave NE along with their associated right-of-way’s. The various protected species which may occur in the corresponding FLUCCS communities are shown below in Table 3. 7 9.A.5.c Packet Pg. 1455 Attachment: GMPA Application - Whole Package (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) Protected Species Survey Earth Tech Environmental, LLC www.eteflorida.com TABLE 3. PROTECTED SPECIES LIST ACCORDING TO FLUCCS CATEGORY FLUCCS POTENTIAL LISTED SPECIES SCIENTIFIC NAME DESIGNATED STATUS FWC OR FDACS FWS 411 Beautiful Pawpaw Deeringothamnus rugelii var. pulchellus E E Big Cypress Fox Squirrel Sciurus niger avicennia T - Eastern Indigo Snake Drymarchon corais couperi T T Fakahatchee Burmannia Burmannia flava E - Florida Coontie Zamia integrifolia CE - Florida Panther Felis concolor coryi E E Gopher Tortoise Gopherus polyphemus T - Red-Cockaded Woodpecker Picoides borealis E E Satinleaf Chrysophyllum oliviforme T - Southeastern American Kestrel Falco sparverius paulus T - Twisted Air Plant Tillandsia flexuosa T - 624 American Alligator Alligator mississippiensis SSC T(S/A) Butterfly Orchid Encyclia tampensis CE - Common Wild Pine Tillandsia fasciculata E - Everglades Mink Mustela vison evergladensis T - Florida Panther Felis concolor coryi E E Little Blue Heron Egretta caerulea T - Tricolored Heron Egretta tricolor T - Wood Stork Mycteria americana T T 814 NONE - - - Abbreviations Agencies: Status: FDACS = Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services CE = Commercially Exploited FWC = Florida Fish & Wildlife Conservation Commission E = Endangered FWS = United States Fish and Wildlife Service SSC = Species of Special Concern T = Threatened T(S/A) = Threatened/Similarity of Appearance 8 9.A.5.c Packet Pg. 1456 Attachment: GMPA Application - Whole Package (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) Protected Species Survey Earth Tech Environmental, LLC www.eteflorida.com 5.0 RESULTS All relevant species observed on the Subject Property are detailed in Table 4 and any protected species observed are specifically noted. See Figure 5 below for transect and field results. Figure 5. Transect Map & Field Results 9 9.A.5.c Packet Pg. 1457 Attachment: GMPA Application - Whole Package (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) Protected Species Survey Earth Tech Environmental, LLC www.eteflorida.com TABLE 4. SPECIES OBSERVED ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY COMMON NAME SCIENTIFIC NAME OBSERVATIONS LISTED SPECIES? STATUS Birds Blue Jay Cyanocitta cristata DV N - Red-Bellied Woodpecker Melanerpes carolinus DV N - Mammals NONE - - - - Reptiles NONE - - - - Amphibians NONE - - - - Plants Butterfly Orchid Encyclia tampensis DV N CE Common Wild Pine* Tillandsia fasciculata DV Y SE * = protected species Abbreviations Observations:Observations: Status: C = Cavity N = Nest CE = Commercially Exploited DB = Day Bed OH = Observed Hole/Burrow FE = Federally Endangered DV = Direct Visual OT = Observed Tracks FT = Federally Threatened HV = Heard Vocalization(s)R = Remains SE = State Endangered MT = Marked Tree S = Scat SSC = Species of Special Concern ST = State Threatened Below are discussions of each listed species observed on the Subject Property: Listed Plants Common wild pine (Tillandsia fasciculata) and butterfly orchids (Encyclia tampensis) were observed on the Subject Property. Typically, individual plants are relocated from proposed impact areas into onsite (or offsite) preserves prior to construction. One nest was observed approximately 25 feet high in a living cypress tree in the wetland area near the southern property boundary. No species were observed utilizing the nest and it is inconclusive the species that built it. The groundcover below the nest is heavily invaded with Brazilian pepper. The site does have community types in which protected species could reside. During permitting, the following listed species concerns may be raised by the agencies: 10 9.A.5.c Packet Pg. 1458 Attachment: GMPA Application - Whole Package (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) Protected Species Survey Earth Tech Environmental, LLC www.eteflorida.com Figure 6. Florida Bonneted Bat Consultation Area Florida Bonneted Bat (Eumops floridana) The Subject Property falls within the Florida Bonneted Bat (FBB) Consultation Area and FBB Focal Area (see Figure 6 above). During the species survey, no potential bat cavities were observed. The 5.15-acre property is surrounded by development on all sides. Prior to any development or permitting activities, the US Fish & Wildlife Service (USFWS) may require acoustic surveys to further determine presence or absence of FBB roosts or foraging on the property. 11 9.A.5.c Packet Pg. 1459 Attachment: GMPA Application - Whole Package (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) Protected Species Survey Earth Tech Environmental, LLC www.eteflorida.com Figure 7. Wood Stork Information Wood Stork (Mycteria americana) The Subject Property falls within the core foraging area (estimated at 18.6 miles) of at least two (2) wood stork colonies in Collier County. See Figure 7 above for wood stork colony and foraging information as it relates to the property. The dense/overgrown nature of the wetland habitat on the property likely precludes wood stork foraging. Consultation with USFWS will likely not be necessary for wood stork and wood stork foraging. 12 9.A.5.c Packet Pg. 1460 Attachment: GMPA Application - Whole Package (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) Protected Species Survey Earth Tech Environmental, LLC www.eteflorida.com Figure 8. Florida Panther Information Florida Panther (Felis concolor coryi) The property does fall within the USFWS Florida panther habitat zones and consultation areas. See Figure 8 for Florida panther information as it relates to the Subject Property. Consultation with the USFWS will likely be necessary for Florida panther. 13 9.A.5.c Packet Pg. 1461 Attachment: GMPA Application - Whole Package (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) Protected Species Survey Earth Tech Environmental, LLC www.eteflorida.com Figure 9. Black Bear Information Florida Black Bear (Ursus americanus floridanus) The property falls within the FWC mapped range for Florida black Bear. Telemetry points from tagged bears have been documented on and in the vicinity of the Subject Property. See Figure 9 for black bear mappings as they relate to the Subject Property. The County may require the Client to implement FWC- approved bear-proof waste receptacles on the property. 14 9.A.5.c Packet Pg. 1462 Attachment: GMPA Application - Whole Package (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) Protected Species Survey Earth Tech Environmental, LLC www.eteflorida.com 6.0 REFERENCES Ashton, Ray E. and Patricia S. “The Natural History and Management for the Gopher Tortoise.” Krieger Publishing Company. Malabar, Florida. 2008. Collier County Property Appraiser. http://www.collierappraiser.com Cox, James; Inkley, Douglas; and Kautz, Randy. “Ecology and Habitat Protection Needs of Gopher Tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus) Populations Found on Lands Slated for Large-Scale Development in Florida.” Nongame Wildlife Program Technical Report No. 4. December 1987. http://www.fwspubs.org/doi/suppl/10.3996/062015-JFWM-055/suppl_file/062015-jfwm- 055.s2.pdf?code=ufws-site “Florida’s Endangered and Threatened Species”- Official List. Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission. Updated December 2018. https://myfwc.com/media/1945/threatend-endangered-species.pdf http://myfwc.com/imperiledspecies/ Florida Land Use, Cover and Forms Classification (FLUCCS) Handbook. Florida Department of Transportation. January 1999. http://www.fdot.gov/geospatial/documentsandpubs/fluccmanual1999.pdf http://www.fdot.gov/geospatial/doc_pubs.shtm Weaver, Richard E. and Anderson, Patti J. “Notes on Florida’s Endangered and Threatened Plants.” Bureau of Entomology, Nematology and Plant Pathology – Botany Section. Contribution No. 38, 5th Edition. 2010. http://freshfromflorida.s3.amazonaws.com/fl-endangered-plants.pdf http://www.freshfromflorida.com/Divisions-Offices/Plant-Industry/Bureaus-and-Services/Bureau-of- Entomology-Nematology-Plant-Pathology/Botany/Florida-s-Endangered-Plants 15 9.A.5.c Packet Pg. 1463 Attachment: GMPA Application - Whole Package (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) Environmental Data for CU Earth Tech Environmental, LLC www.eteflorida.com APPENDIX C Earth Tech Environmental Staff Qualifications 9.A.5.c Packet Pg. 1464 Attachment: GMPA Application - Whole Package (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) 239.304.0030 | www.eteflorida.com Mr. Boone joined Earth Tech Environmental, LLC (ETE) in 2014 as a GIS Specialist, and currently specializes in various Environmental Permitting Processes. As a Permitting Specialist, Jeremy fulfills duties in environmental consulting, residential and commercial ERP permitting, wetland & wildlife monitoring, and helps oversee general GIS operations. Relevant Experience Jeremy has an extensive background in the successful implementation of complex calculations, aerial mapping, digitization, drafting design and illustration, while ensuring production of the highest quality products for all clients. Mr. Boone is also experienced in the use of advanced GPS systems, while safeguarding the highest accuracy standards through the use of TerraSync software and Trimble GeoXH/7X equipment. Since 2006, he has also specialized in producing maps and exhibits in various environmental, engineering and architectural disciplines which include land development, water resources, surveying/mapping, drafting, environmental services and utilities. Mr. Boone also possesses broad-based customer service experience in both the private and public sectors, and he also serves as a certified Spanish interpreter. Jeremy’s work experience includes: Wetland Jurisdictional Determinations Project Management/Coordination Vegetation and Habitat Mapping Bonneted Bat Cavity Surveys GIS Mapping & Exhibits Gopher Tortoise Surveys & Permitting Environmental Resource Permitting (ERP) Listed Species Management Plans Digitizing Aerial Signatures Monitoring Well Installation Cross Section & Profile Mapping Wetland & Water Level Monitoring UMAM Mitigation Assessments Turbidity Sampling and Monitoring Protected Species Surveys Water Use Monitoring and Compliance On-Site Inspections Flow Meter Calibrations Post Permit Compliance Delineation for Site Clearing Due Diligence Reports Georeferencing Imagery (SID, TIF, JPG) Native Vegetation Restoration Planning Isometric & 3D Rendering Exotic Plant Removal & Treatment Ecological Assessments Native Vegetation Planting & Installation Drone Mapping and Photography Preserve Management Plans Wildfire Assessments GPS Collection & Processing Mangrove Monitoring Relevant Certifications/Credentials Wetland Delineation, Plant Identification & Hydric Soils, SWFAEP, 2017 Notary Public, State of Florida, 2015 Spanish Translator, Translation Professionals, 2011 Map 3D 2007 Essentials, CADD Centers of Florida, 2007 Custom Civil 3D, CADD CENTERS of Florida, 2007 JEREMY BOONE Environmental Permitting Specialist e: jeremyb@eteflorida.com t: 239.304.0030 m: 239.771.7325 Years’ Experience 13 years Education/Training B.S. Digital Entertainment Design Full Sail University (2016) Implementation of Geodatabases ESRI (2014) AutoCAD for Residential Architecture Edison State College (2009) High School Diploma Charter High School for Architecture + Design (2006) Professional Affiliations Florida Association of Environmental Professionals (FAEP) Software Experience ArcGIS ArcView ArcMap GeoDatabases AutoCAD CAD Raster Design Land Desktop Land Enabled Map Civil 3D Map3D GPS GeoXH/XT/7X ArcPAD Terrasync 9.A.5.c Packet Pg. 1465 Attachment: GMPA Application - Whole Package (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) AUSTON GERMANO Ecologist e: austong@eteflorida.com t: 239.304.0030 m: 214.755.7412 Years' Experience 6 years Education/Training B.A. Environmental Studies Florida Gulf Coast University Mr. Germano joined Earth Tech Environmental, LLC (ETE) in 2014. He has gained a vast array of experience in a broad range of ecological restoration and consulting work. This experience includes exotic species removals, littoral shelf plantings, vegetation and habitat mapping, protected species surveys, vegetation monitoring surveys, monitoring well installation/maintenance, water monitoring events, and GIS mapping. Relevant Experience Auston has worked for Florida Gulf Coast University Grounds Department where he was responsible for supervising and assisting a Department of Corrections work crew in the restoration and mitigation of the natural areas on the FGCU campus. This has provided Auston with valuable experience in crew leadership and the supervised management and restoration of South Florida’s natural areas. Auston's work experience includes: (2014) Professional Affiliations Florida Association of Environmental Professionals (FAEP) Project Management Exotic Species Removal Native Vegetation Restoration Planting Vegetation & Habitat Mapping Monitoring Well Installation Bald Eagle Monitoring Protected Species Surveys GIS Mapping Wetland Jurisdictional Delineations Gopher Tortoise Surveys/Permitting/ Relocation Landscaping Turbidity Monitoring Water Chloride Monitoring Relevant Certifications/Credentials Waste Management Mangrove Trimming Urban Areas Weed Control Recreation Field Maintenance Property Survey and Staking Limited Bathometric Mapping Irrigation Maintenance Shorebird Monitoring Seagrass Monitoring Mangrove/Vegetation Monitoring Flow Meter Accuracy Calibrations Limited Swale Construction Soil/ Sediment Testing Certified Environmental Scientist #11866017785190603, National Registry of Environmental Professionals, 2019 Authorized Gopher Tortoise Agent #GTA-17-00025A, Florida Fish & Wildlife Conservation Commission, 2017 Commercial Applicator License #CM23746, Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, 2015 State of Florida Department of Corrections Training Certification, October 2014 239.304.0030 | www.eteflorida.com 9.A.5.c Packet Pg. 1466 Attachment: GMPA Application - Whole Package (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) 9.A.5.cPacket Pg. 1467Attachment: GMPA Application - Whole Package (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) 9.A.5.cPacket Pg. 1468Attachment: GMPA Application - Whole Package (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) 9.A.5.cPacket Pg. 1469Attachment: GMPA Application - Whole Package (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) 9.A.5.cPacket Pg. 1470Attachment: GMPA Application - Whole Package (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) 9.A.5.cPacket Pg. 1471Attachment: GMPA Application - Whole Package (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) 800 Harbour Drive, Suite 210, Naples, FL 34103 • 239-649-1551 • info@rdafl.com • www.rdafl.com April 29, 2021 at 6:00 PM Neighborhood Information Meeting Iglesia Pentecostes Peniel Church 13260 Immokalee Road, Suite 7 Naples, FL 34120 Agenda for Neighborhood Information Meeting Meeting Purpose: This Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM) is being held to discuss the formal application that has been submitted to Collier County for approval of a request for a Conditional Use (CU) and a Growth Management Plan Amendment (GMPA) for a church, religious facility, or place of worship in the E, Estates Zoning District. (CU-PL20190001326 & GMPA-PL20190001333) The subject property is located on the northwest corner of 8th St NE and 22nd Ave NE at parcel numbers 37750560106 & 37750560009. An address has not yet been assigned for these two parcels. Facilitators: Ronny De Aza, P.E. RDA Consulting Engineering, LLC. 800 Harbour Drive, Suite 210 Naples, FL 34104 Phone: (239) 649-1551 Email: Info@rdafl.com & Pastor Jorge Martin Iglesia Pentecostes Peniel 757 107th Ave North Naples, FL 34108 Phone: (239) 596-2556 Email: pbendicion@yahoo.com Schedule: 6:00 PM – 6:15 PM Project Introduction and Overview of Proposed Church Site Plan 6:15 PM – 7:00 PM Discussion of Church Project with Community Members 7:00 PM Conclusions and Summary Business and property owners, residents, and visitors; thank you for your time attending this NIM and providing input on the proposed project. If you have any additional questions or comments, please reach out to the email address or phone number listed above. 9.A.5.d Packet Pg. 1472 Attachment: NIM Agenda and Site Plan (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) WATER MANAGEMENT PROPOSED PRESERVE AREA AREA = 33,974 SF AREA = 0.78 AC PROPOSED CHURCH 15' TYPE "B" LANDSCAPE BUFFER PROPERTY BOUNDARY EXISTING 50' ROADWAY EASEMENT 22ND AVENUE NE (COUNTY ROW)8TH STREET NE(COUNTY ROW)30' SIDE SETBACK 75'REAR SETBACK122' EDGE OF PRESERVE SETBACK PRESERVE BOUNDARY EX. PROPERTY LINE PRESERVE BOUNDARY EDGE OF EX. ASPHALT PROPOSED DUMPSTER AND RECYCLING AREA PROPOSED SEPTIC FIELD LOCATION PROPOSED POTABLE WELL LOCATION EDGE OF PRESERVE SETBACK 10' TYPE "D" LANDSCAPE BUFFER37.5' FRONT SETBACK15' TYPE "D" LANDSCAPE BUFFEREXISTING 30' ROADWAY EASEMENT PROPOSED SIDEWALK CONNECTION 37.5' STREET FRONT SETBACK 25' PRESERVE SETBACK 10' TYPE "D" LANDSCAPE BUFFER 00 100'50' SCALE: 1" = 100' N IGLESIA PENTECOSTES PENIEL - GOLDEN GATE CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN RDA CONSULTING ENGINEERS 800 HARBOUR DRIVE, SUITE 210 NAPLES, FLORIDA 34103 PHONE: (239) 649-1551 FAX: (239) 649-7112 WWW.RDAFL.COM PROJECT #:RDA19084 PAGE:1 OF 2 DATE:11/5/2020 9.A.5.d Packet Pg. 1473 Attachment: NIM Agenda and Site Plan (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) IGLESIA PENTECOSTES PENIEL - GOLDEN GATE CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN RDA CONSULTING ENGINEERS 800 HARBOUR DRIVE, SUITE 210 NAPLES, FLORIDA 34103 PHONE: (239) 649-1551 FAX: (239) 649-7112 WWW.RDAFL.COM PROJECT #:RDA19084 PAGE:2 OF 2 DATE:11/5/2020 PARKING SUMMARY BUILDING USE # OF SEATS MINIMUM REQUIRED SPACES SPACES REQUIRED SPACES PROVIDED CHURCH 250 SEATS IN THE CHAPEL AREA 3 SPACES FOR EACH 7 SEATS IN THE CHAPEL AREA 107.1 = 108 108 (5 HC SPACES) NOTE PARKING SPACE REQUIREMENT PER SECTION 4.05.04.g. TABLE 17 OF THE COLLIER COUNTY LDC. HANDICAP SPACES HAVE BEEN PROVIDED BASED ON COLLIER COUNTY LDC SECTION 4.05.07 TABLE 19. GENERAL NOTES: 1.VEGETATION WITHIN THE PRESERVE WILL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF COLLIER COUNTY LDC SECTION 3.05.07. 2.A SIDEWALK ALONG 22ND AVENUE NE WILL BE PROVIDED AND WILL CONNECT TO THE EXISTING SIDEWALK ALONG 8TH STREET NE. 3.THESE PLANS ARE FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMITTING AND ARE NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION USE. PRESERVE AREA CALCULATION TOTAL SITE AREA 224,270 SF = 5.15 AC PRESERVE REQUIREMENT 15% REQUIRED PRESERVE 33,641 SF = 0.77 AC PROVIDED PRESERVE 33,974 SF = 0.78 AC ADJACENT ZONING AND LAND USE ZONING LAND USE N ESTATE, E RESIDENTIAL S ROW, THEN ESTATE, E RESIDENTIAL E ROW, THEN ESTATE, E RESIDENTIAL W ESTATE, E RESIDENTIAL LAND USE SUMMARY ACRES % OF SITE WATER MANAGEMENT +/- 0.28 5% PERIMETER BUFFERS +/- 0.43 8% PAVEMENT / SIDEWALK +/- 1.08 21% BUILDING FOOTPRINT AREA +/- 0.19 4% PRESERVE AREA +/- 0.80 16% MISC. OPEN SPACE +/- 2.37 46% TOTAL SITE AREA +/- 5.15 100% PLANNING NOTES CURRENT ZONING E PROPOSED ZONING E / CONDITIONAL USE CURRENT LAND USE UNDEVELOPED FUTURE LAND USE ESTATES DESIGNATION PROPOSED LAND USE CHURCH NUMBER OF SEATS 250 SEATS MAXIMUM CHURCH SQUARE FOOTAGE 9,000 SF MAXIMUM ZONED BUILDING HEIGHT 30 FT MAXIMUM ACTUAL BUILDING HEIGHT 30 FT UTILITY NOTE: POTABLE WATER WILL BE PROVIDED VIA A PRIVATE GROUND WATER WELL AND SANITARY SEWER TREATMENT WILL BE PROVIDED VIA A PRIVATE SEPTIC TANK AND DRAIN FIELD. LOCATIONS OF POTABLE WATER WELL AND SEPTIC TANK WILL BE DETERMINED UPON FINAL SITE DEVELOPMENT PLANNING AND ARE THEREFORE NOT SHOWN ON THIS CONCEPTUAL MASTER PLAN. REQUIRED SETBACKS SUMMARY REQUIRED BUILDING FRONT - CORNER STREET SETBACK 37.5' FRONT - CORNER STREET SETBACK 37.5' SIDE SETBACK 30' REAR SETBACK 75' PRESERVE PRINCIPAL SETBACK 25' ACCESSORY SETBACK 10' 9.A.5.d Packet Pg. 1474 Attachment: NIM Agenda and Site Plan (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) 9.A.5.e Packet Pg. 1475 Attachment: NIM Sign-In Sheet (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) 9.A.5.e Packet Pg. 1476 Attachment: NIM Sign-In Sheet (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) 9.A.5.e Packet Pg. 1477 Attachment: NIM Sign-In Sheet (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) 800 Harbour Drive, Suite 210, Naples, FL 34103 • 239-649-1551 • info@rdafl.com • www.rdafl.com April 29, 2021 at 6:00 PM Neighborhood Information Meeting Iglesia Pentecostes Peniel Church 13260 Immokalee Road, Suite 7 Naples, FL 34120 Neighborhood Information Meeting – Summary Notes • Meeting was scheduled to start at 6:00PM on 4/29/2021 and was postponed to 6:05PM due to heavy traffic. Ronny called meeting to order at 6:05pm. • Meeting began with Ronny introducing the project location and scope. The Pastor, Jorge Martin, then discussed how the church operated and what kind of church they were. • Ronny corrected news report that stated the building would be 3 stories and stated the proposed building would be 1 story. • Attendee asked who Laura DeJohn was from Collier County. Laura introduced herself and explained the CU & GMPA process to all who attended the meeting. • One neighbor spoke up and asked how many people here live near the project. A majority of people in the NIM raised their hands and multiple people began talking. Laura DeJohn took control of the meeting and Ronny continued to explain the project. • The Pastor, Jorge Martin, explained when their congregation meets. Ronny continued to talk about the specifics for this project (number of seats, square footage, etc.). Pastor Jorge Martin then talked about what this church will bring to the community. • Laura mentioned some people were standing just outside the door, so people shifted in order to allow everyone inside the building for the NIM. • Pastor Jorge Martin then explained Randall Blvd extension that will help alleviate the traffic that is currently experienced in this area. He also explained that their sister church in Naples Park has never experienced a noise compliant even though they are in a residential community. • The meeting was then opened up to community discussion/questions. • Joseph Diaz then spoke about the existing churches on Immokalee Road and asked why this church was not going on Immokalee Road. Pastor explained that the church does not have enough money to build or purchase a building on Immokalee Road. • Two members of the meeting began discussing the traffic concerns loudly and Laura and Ronny had to bring the meeting back under control. • Heidi Sefferon (sp?) then spoke about a church encroaching into the residential area of the estates and how that is undesirable to her. She mentioned that a church go into a more commercial area. • Tony Reyas (sp?) then spoke about potential noise and dirt issues during construction phase of the project. Also mentioned issues with increased traffic. Does not want to see this project built on this property. • Another attendee brought up traffic concerns and Ronny discussed how transportation engineers determine if the project will have a significant impact on the traffic or not through a TIS report. • Dan Brett then asked multiple questions: 9.A.5.f Packet Pg. 1478 Attachment: NIM Summary Notes (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) 800 Harbour Drive, Suite 210, Naples, FL 34103 • 239-649-1551 • info@rdafl.com • www.rdafl.com o 1st question. How much clearing will occur? Ronny explained that only the developed area for parking, building, stormwater management, etc. will be cleared. Nothing extra and preserve will be maintained. o 2nd question. Any future building planned? Ronny and Pastor explained no. o 3rd question. Any area in estates where a church has been approved , question directed to Laura DeJohn. She did not have an example offhand and explained we are here for this specific project. • Andy (sp?) Garcia, who is an adjacent property owner to the subject property, spoke up in full support of this church project and believes that this project is good for the street. • Miguel Cruz spoke in support of the church and how a church is beneficial for the community. How a church can help reduce crime in kids in a community. • Anthony Weaver spoke about agreeing that church can be a good thing for a community but is opposed to bringing a commercial project to this specific location. Mentioned that they already have a littering problem on this street. Ronny explained that in a typical estate zoning that a church would be allowed with a conditional use application, but this project is more complicated as this application includes a GMPA to allow for a church on this specific property. • Joseph Diaz then spoke about how the meeting needs to stick to facts, not necessarily an individual’s belief in god and if they attend church. Ronny agreed and continued the meeting. • Angus Weaver then spoke up in opposition of the church saying he wants is somewhere else and not in his community. • Teresa Ansbro @ 580 22nd Ave NE then spoke about not supporting the church in this location and she mentioned that she read every document submitted for this application to ensure she was informed about the project. Mentioned how it was better to build communities around a church instead of inserting a church into an existing community. Traffic concerns were also brought up. Environmental concerns were also brought up. • Danielle Krivda @ 1490 8th St NE mentioned how the church that she attends went through this same process in the estate went through a similar process and got approved/built. Mentioned neighbors complain about that church. Had concerns with putting a church in this residential area. Had question about what style of church it was and mentioned the band set. Pastor Jorge Martin explained that this church does not have large noise and invited everyone to attend a church service if they are interested in seeing what the church is about. • Some people started to leave the meeting and Ronny brought up the sign in sheet that was at the front of the room. The individuals leaving did come up to sign in. Eventually clip boards were used and the sign in sheet was passed around. Ronny also mentioned our information was on the agenda if anyone would like to contact with concerns. • Buddy Smith @ 2220 8th St NE asked if there was an agenda for upcoming meeting with Collier County staff. Ronny explained that these meeting dates have not yet been set and that everyone will be informed same as the NIM. The attendee suggested moving the church to a location that gets more traffic so they can get more members. • Another attendee, who was a member of the church, spoke in support of the project and mentioned that the growth in Collier County can not be changed/stopped. Mentioned noise restrictions that the church will be held to if they are too loud. 9.A.5.f Packet Pg. 1479 Attachment: NIM Summary Notes (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) 800 Harbour Drive, Suite 210, Naples, FL 34103 • 239-649-1551 • info@rdafl.com • www.rdafl.com • Anthony Weaver asked how to have additional people added to notifications for the future meetings. Ronny asked him to send an email with his address and mentioned that he will be included in future notification letters. Mentioned how letters for the NIM were only sent to property owners within 1,000 ft. • Richard Nexti (sp?) @ 2145 8th St NE asked what development area was and mentioned he would be willing to swap/sell his property at 8th St and Randall Blvd to move church location. • There was no additional questions/comments at this time and Ronny then concluded the meeting at 7:05pm. Ronny reminded everyone to sign the sign-in sheet if they were interested. 9.A.5.f Packet Pg. 1480 Attachment: NIM Summary Notes (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) 9.A.5.g Packet Pg. 1481 Attachment: Annette Kniola Petitions of opposition - 250 (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) 9.A.5.g Packet Pg. 1482 Attachment: Annette Kniola Petitions of opposition - 250 (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) 9.A.5.g Packet Pg. 1483 Attachment: Annette Kniola Petitions of opposition - 250 (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) 9.A.5.g Packet Pg. 1484 Attachment: Annette Kniola Petitions of opposition - 250 (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) 9.A.5.g Packet Pg. 1485 Attachment: Annette Kniola Petitions of opposition - 250 (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) 9.A.5.g Packet Pg. 1486 Attachment: Annette Kniola Petitions of opposition - 250 (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) 9.A.5.g Packet Pg. 1487 Attachment: Annette Kniola Petitions of opposition - 250 (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) 9.A.5.g Packet Pg. 1488 Attachment: Annette Kniola Petitions of opposition - 250 (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) 9.A.5.g Packet Pg. 1489 Attachment: Annette Kniola Petitions of opposition - 250 (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) 9.A.5.g Packet Pg. 1490 Attachment: Annette Kniola Petitions of opposition - 250 (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) 9.A.5.g Packet Pg. 1491 Attachment: Annette Kniola Petitions of opposition - 250 (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) 9.A.5.g Packet Pg. 1492 Attachment: Annette Kniola Petitions of opposition - 250 (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) 9.A.5.g Packet Pg. 1493 Attachment: Annette Kniola Petitions of opposition - 250 (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) 9.A.5.g Packet Pg. 1494 Attachment: Annette Kniola Petitions of opposition - 250 (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) 9.A.5.g Packet Pg. 1495 Attachment: Annette Kniola Petitions of opposition - 250 (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) 9.A.5.g Packet Pg. 1496 Attachment: Annette Kniola Petitions of opposition - 250 (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) 9.A.5.g Packet Pg. 1497 Attachment: Annette Kniola Petitions of opposition - 250 (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) 9.A.5.g Packet Pg. 1498 Attachment: Annette Kniola Petitions of opposition - 250 (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) 9.A.5.g Packet Pg. 1499 Attachment: Annette Kniola Petitions of opposition - 250 (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) 9.A.5.g Packet Pg. 1500 Attachment: Annette Kniola Petitions of opposition - 250 (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) 9.A.5.g Packet Pg. 1501 Attachment: Annette Kniola Petitions of opposition - 250 (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) 9.A.5.g Packet Pg. 1502 Attachment: Annette Kniola Petitions of opposition - 250 (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) 9.A.5.g Packet Pg. 1503 Attachment: Annette Kniola Petitions of opposition - 250 (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) 9.A.5.g Packet Pg. 1504 Attachment: Annette Kniola Petitions of opposition - 250 (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) 9.A.5.g Packet Pg. 1505 Attachment: Annette Kniola Petitions of opposition - 250 (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) 9.A.5.g Packet Pg. 1506 Attachment: Annette Kniola Petitions of opposition - 250 (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) 9.A.5.g Packet Pg. 1507 Attachment: Annette Kniola Petitions of opposition - 250 (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) 9.A.5.h Packet Pg. 1508 Attachment: 6. Letter of Project Support from Neighbor (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) 9.A.5.iPacket Pg. 1509Attachment: 15. Neighborhood Support Letters petition - 420 (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) 9.A.5.iPacket Pg. 1510Attachment: 15. Neighborhood Support Letters petition - 420 (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) 9.A.5.iPacket Pg. 1511Attachment: 15. Neighborhood Support Letters petition - 420 (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) 9.A.5.iPacket Pg. 1512Attachment: 15. Neighborhood Support Letters petition - 420 (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) 9.A.5.iPacket Pg. 1513Attachment: 15. Neighborhood Support Letters petition - 420 (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) 9.A.5.iPacket Pg. 1514Attachment: 15. Neighborhood Support Letters petition - 420 (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) 9.A.5.iPacket Pg. 1515Attachment: 15. Neighborhood Support Letters petition - 420 (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) 9.A.5.iPacket Pg. 1516Attachment: 15. Neighborhood Support Letters petition - 420 (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) 9.A.5.iPacket Pg. 1517Attachment: 15. Neighborhood Support Letters petition - 420 (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) 9.A.5.iPacket Pg. 1518Attachment: 15. Neighborhood Support Letters petition - 420 (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) 9.A.5.iPacket Pg. 1519Attachment: 15. Neighborhood Support Letters petition - 420 (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) 9.A.5.iPacket Pg. 1520Attachment: 15. Neighborhood Support Letters petition - 420 (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) 9.A.5.iPacket Pg. 1521Attachment: 15. Neighborhood Support Letters petition - 420 (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) 9.A.5.iPacket Pg. 1522Attachment: 15. Neighborhood Support Letters petition - 420 (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) 9.A.5.iPacket Pg. 1523Attachment: 15. Neighborhood Support Letters petition - 420 (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) 9.A.5.iPacket Pg. 1524Attachment: 15. Neighborhood Support Letters petition - 420 (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) 9.A.5.iPacket Pg. 1525Attachment: 15. Neighborhood Support Letters petition - 420 (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) 9.A.5.iPacket Pg. 1526Attachment: 15. Neighborhood Support Letters petition - 420 (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) 9.A.5.iPacket Pg. 1527Attachment: 15. Neighborhood Support Letters petition - 420 (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) 9.A.5.iPacket Pg. 1528Attachment: 15. Neighborhood Support Letters petition - 420 (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) 9.A.5.iPacket Pg. 1529Attachment: 15. Neighborhood Support Letters petition - 420 (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) 9.A.5.iPacket Pg. 1530Attachment: 15. Neighborhood Support Letters petition - 420 (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) 9.A.5.iPacket Pg. 1531Attachment: 15. Neighborhood Support Letters petition - 420 (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) 9.A.5.iPacket Pg. 1532Attachment: 15. Neighborhood Support Letters petition - 420 (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) 9.A.5.iPacket Pg. 1533Attachment: 15. Neighborhood Support Letters petition - 420 (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) 9.A.5.iPacket Pg. 1534Attachment: 15. Neighborhood Support Letters petition - 420 (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) 9.A.5.iPacket Pg. 1535Attachment: 15. Neighborhood Support Letters petition - 420 (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) 9.A.5.iPacket Pg. 1536Attachment: 15. Neighborhood Support Letters petition - 420 (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) 9.A.5.iPacket Pg. 1537Attachment: 15. Neighborhood Support Letters petition - 420 (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) 9.A.5.iPacket Pg. 1538Attachment: 15. Neighborhood Support Letters petition - 420 (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) 9.A.5.iPacket Pg. 1539Attachment: 15. Neighborhood Support Letters petition - 420 (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) 9.A.5.iPacket Pg. 1540Attachment: 15. Neighborhood Support Letters petition - 420 (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) 9.A.5.iPacket Pg. 1541Attachment: 15. Neighborhood Support Letters petition - 420 (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) 9.A.5.iPacket Pg. 1542Attachment: 15. Neighborhood Support Letters petition - 420 (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) 9.A.5.iPacket Pg. 1543Attachment: 15. Neighborhood Support Letters petition - 420 (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) 9.A.5.iPacket Pg. 1544Attachment: 15. Neighborhood Support Letters petition - 420 (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) 9.A.5.iPacket Pg. 1545Attachment: 15. Neighborhood Support Letters petition - 420 (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) 9.A.5.iPacket Pg. 1546Attachment: 15. Neighborhood Support Letters petition - 420 (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) 9.A.5.iPacket Pg. 1547Attachment: 15. Neighborhood Support Letters petition - 420 (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) 9.A.5.iPacket Pg. 1548Attachment: 15. Neighborhood Support Letters petition - 420 (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) 9.A.5.iPacket Pg. 1549Attachment: 15. Neighborhood Support Letters petition - 420 (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) 9.A.5.iPacket Pg. 1550Attachment: 15. Neighborhood Support Letters petition - 420 (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) 9.A.5.iPacket Pg. 1551Attachment: 15. Neighborhood Support Letters petition - 420 (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) 9.A.5.j Packet Pg. 1552 Attachment: Sign Posting Affidavit - Signed (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) 9.A.5.j Packet Pg. 1553 Attachment: Sign Posting Affidavit - Signed (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliercountyfl.gov (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Hybrid Virtual Quasi-Judicial Public Hearing Waiver Emergency/Executive Order 2020-04 Hearing of the Collier County Planning Commission and Board of County Commissioners For Petition Number(s): _________________________________________________________________ Regarding the above subject petition number(s), ________________________________ (Name of Applicant) elects to proceed during the declared emergency with hybrid virtual public hearings of the Collier County Planning Commission and Board of County Commissioners, and waives the right to contest any procedural irregularity due to the hybrid virtual nature of the public hearing. Name: _________________________________ Date: ___________________________ Signature*: ______________________________฀ Applicant฀Legal Counsel to Applicant * This form must be signed by either the Applicant (if the applicant is a corporate entity, this must be an officer of the corporate entity) or the legal counsel to the Applicant. ✔ Iglesia Pentecostes Peniel, Inc Diogenes Marquina, President 8/31/2021 PL20190001326 & PL20190001333 9.A.5.k Packet Pg. 1554 Attachment: CCPC-BCC Hybrid Meeting Waiver (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) ND-GCI0711612-01 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the Collier County Planning Commis- sion (CCPC)at 9:00 A.M.,September 16,2021,in the Board of County Commissioners Meeting Room,Third Floor,Collier Government Center,3299 East Ta miami Trail,Naples,FL,to consider: AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA AMENDING ORDINANCE NO.89-05,AS AMENDED,THE COL- LIER COUNTY GROW TH MANAG EMENT PLAN FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA,SPECIFICALLY AMENDING THE RURAL GOLDEN GATE ESTAT ES SUB-ELEMENT OF THE GOLDEN GATE AREA MAS- TER PLAN ELEMENT AND RU RAL GOLDEN GATE ESTAT ES FUTURE LAND USE MAP AND MAP SERIES;BY AMENDING THE ESTAT ES-MIXED USE DISTRICT TO ADD THE 8TH STREET NE-22ND AV ENUE NE SUBDISTRICT TO ALLOW A 100-SEAT CHURCH AS A CONDITIONAL USE.THE SUBJECT PROPERTY CONSISTS OF 5.15± AC RES AND IS LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF 8TH STREET NE AND 22ND AV ENUE NE IN SECTION 27,TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH,RANGE 27 EAST,COL- LIER COUNTY,FLORIDA;AND FURTHERMORE,DIRECTING TRANSMITTAL OF THE ADOPTED AMENDMENT TO THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY;PROV IDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND PROV IDING FOR AN EF- FECTIVE DATE.[PL20190001333] AND A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA PROV IDING FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A CONDITIONAL USE TO ALLOW A 100-SEAT CHURCH WITHIN AN ESTAT ES (E)ZONING DISTRICT PURSU- ANT TO SECTION 2.03.01.B.1.c.1 OF THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE FOR A 5.15±AC RE PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF 8TH STREET NE AND 22ND AV ENUE NE IN SECTION 27,TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 27 EAST,COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA.[PL20190001326]WilsonBLVDNIm mo ka le e RD RANDALL BLVD !I Project Location 8thSTNE22nd AV E NE All interested parties are invited to appear and be heard.Copies of the proposed ordinance and resolution will be made available for inspection at the Collier County Clerk’s Office,Fo urth Floor, Collier County Government Center,3299 East Ta miami Trail,Suite 401,Naples,FL,one we ek prior to the scheduled hearing.Written comments must be filed with the Zoning Division,Zoning Services Section,prior to September 16,2021. As part of an ongoing initiative to promote social distancing during the COVID-19 pandemic,the public will have the opportunity to provide public comments remotely,as well as in person,during this proceeding.Individuals who wo uld like to participate remotely,should register any time after the agenda is posted on the County website which is 6 days before the meeting through the link pro- vided on the front page of the County website at www.colliercountyfl.gov.Individuals who register will receive an email in advance of the public hearing detailing how they can participate remotely in this meeting.For additional information about the meeting,please call Thomas Clarke at (239) 252-2526 or email to CCPCRemoteParticipation@CollierCountyFL.gov. Any person who decides to appeal any decision of the Collier County Planning Commission will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto and therefore,may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made,which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is based.If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommoda- tion in order to participate in this proceeding,you are entitled,at no cost to you,to the provision of certain assistance.Please contact the Collier County Fa cilities Management Division,located at 3335 Ta miami Trail East,Suite 101,Naples,FL 34112-5356,(239)252-8380,at least two days prior to the meeting.Assisted listening devices for the hearing impaired are available in the Board of County Commissioners Office. Collier County Planning Commission Edwin Fryer,Chairman 9.A.5.l Packet Pg. 1555 Attachment: Ad Proof ND - GC10711612-01 (19896 : PL20190001333 GMP Amendment - Iglesias Pentecostes) 09/16/2021 COLLIER COUNTY Collier County Planning Commission Item Number: 9.A.6 Item Summary: PL20190001326 CU Iglesias Pentecostes Peniel - A resolution of the Board of Zoning Appeals of Collier County, Florida providing for the establishment of a conditional use to allow a 100-seat church within an Estates (E) zoning district pursuant to Section 2.03.01.B.1.c.1 of the Collier County Land Development Code for a +/-5.15 acre property located on the northwest corner of 8th Street NE and 22nd Avenue NE in Section 27, Township 48 South, Range 27 East, Collier County, Florida. (Companion Item PL20190001333 GMPA) [Coordinator: Ray Bellows, AICP, Zoning Manager] Meeting Date: 09/16/2021 Prepared by: Title: – Zoning Name: Laura DeJohn 09/02/2021 8:35 AM Submitted by: Title: – Zoning Name: Mike Bosi 09/02/2021 8:35 AM Approved By: Review: Planning Commission Diane Lynch Review item Completed 09/03/2021 3:48 PM Growth Management Operations & Regulatory Management Donna Guitard Review Item Completed 09/07/2021 9:32 AM Zoning Ray Bellows Additional Reviewer Completed 09/07/2021 10:35 AM Zoning Mike Bosi Zoning Director Review Completed 09/07/2021 11:27 AM Growth Management Department James C French GMD Deputy Dept Head Completed 09/07/2021 1:53 PM Planning Commission Edwin Fryer Meeting Pending 09/16/2021 9:00 AM 9.A.6 Packet Pg. 1556 CU-PL20190001326; Iglesia Pentecostes Peniel Golden Gate Conditional Use Page 1 of 12 September 7, 2021 STAFF REPORT TO: COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: ZONING DIVISION – ZONING SERVICES SECTION GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT HEARING DATE: SEPTEMBER 16, 2021 SUBJECT: PL20190001326; IGLESIA PENTECOSTES PENIEL CHURCH (CU) CONDITIONAL USE (COMPANION TO SMALL SCALE GMPA-PL20190001333) ______________________________________________________________________________ PROPERTY OWNER/AGENT: Owner: Inglesia Pentecostes Peniel, Inc. Agent: Ronny De Aza, P.E. 757 107th Ave North RDA Consulting Engineers, LLC Naples, FL 34108 800 Harbour Dr., Suite #2C Naples, FL 34135 REQUESTED ACTION: The petitioner requests that the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) consider establishment of a conditional use to allow a 100-seat church within an Estates (E) zoning district pursuant to Section 2.03.01.B.1.c.1 of the Collier County Land Development Code (LDC) on 5.15± acres located on the northwest corner of 22nd Avenue NE and 8th Street NE in the Rural Golden Gate Estates. Per Policy 1.1.8 of the Rural Estates Sub Element of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan adopted in the Growth Management Plan, to obtain conditional use approval, a super majority vote (minimum of 4 votes) by the Board of Zoning Appeals shall be required. Companion small scale Growth Management Plan Amendment (GMPA-PL20190001333) is proposed to amend the Future Land Use Map designation for the site from Residential Estates Subdistrict of the Estates – Mixed Use District to a site specific designation of “8th Street NE – 22nd Ave NE Subdistrict” within the Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan. GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The subject parcel is located on the northwest corner of the intersection of 22nd Avenue NE and 8th Street NE Section 27, Township 48 South, Range 27 East, Collier County, Florida. (See location map on the following page) 9.A.6.a Packet Pg. 1557 Attachment: 09-07-21 - Inglesia CU Staff Report (19906 : PL20190001326 Iglesia Pentecostes Peniel CU) CU-PL20190001326; Iglesia Pentecostes Peniel Golden Gate Conditional Use Page 2 of 12 September 7, 2021 9.A.6.a Packet Pg. 1558 Attachment: 09-07-21 - Inglesia CU Staff Report (19906 : PL20190001326 Iglesia Pentecostes Peniel CU) CU-PL20190001326; Iglesia Pentecostes Peniel Golden Gate Conditional Use Page 3 of 12 September 7, 2021 PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The requested conditional use approval for a church is a companion item to Growth Management Plan Amendment PL20190001333, which proposes creation of the “8th Street NE – 22nd Avenue NE Subdistrict” of the Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan. This proposed subdistrict provides for the development of a church through the conditional use process, with a restriction of a maximum total floor area of 5,000 square feet and maximum of 100 seats. The total site area is 224,270 square feet, or 5.15 acres. The conceptual site plan depicts a single building with a maximum 5,000 square feet and a maximum of 100 seats. The conceptual site plan shows 75-foot wide native vegetation buffers to the north and the west where the site adjoins single family developed properties, with supplemental plantings if needed to provide equivalent opacity of a Type B buffer. A private potable water well is proposed, which will also provide fire suppression. The church will be serviced by a private onsite sanitary sewer septic tank and drain field. One full access is proposed on 22nd Avenue NE, which is a two-lane local road. The segment of 22nd Avenue NE that will be accessed by the site is a dead-end street, which extends approximately three-fifths (3/5) a mile between the intersection with 8th Street NE and the western terminus with a north/south drainage canal. Approximately half of the site that is fronting on 8th Street NE is proposed to be undeveloped, including a 0.66-acre preserve area. The conceptual plan shows a front building setback of 37.5 feet along 22nd Avenue NE. Section 2.03.01.B.2 of the Land Development Code describes that conforming corner lots allow for a front setback along the longer lot line to be reduced to 37.5 feet so long as no right-of-way or easement is included within the reduced yard. The two parcels will ultimately need to be combined for both parcels to be eligible for this reduction that is afforded to corner lots. The applicant has agreed to a number of conditions to ensure compatible integration of the church use with the surrounding residential neighborhood. The restrictions include: • Limiting church services and meetings to only Wednesdays and Sundays for a maximum of 6 hours each day • Prohibiting use of the church facility by outside groups • Limiting special events to one per quarter (or four events annually) • Day care, Private schools, Soup kitchens and Homeless shelters shall not be offered on site • Maximum total daily trip generation shall not exceed +/- 8 two-way PM peak hour net trips See the Recommendation section of this staff report for condtitions of approval recommended in addition to those provided in Exhbit C of the draft Resolution (Attachment A). 9.A.6.a Packet Pg. 1559 Attachment: 09-07-21 - Inglesia CU Staff Report (19906 : PL20190001326 Iglesia Pentecostes Peniel CU) CU-PL20190001326; Iglesia Pentecostes Peniel Golden Gate Conditional Use Page 4 of 12 September 7, 2021 Conceptual Site Plan 9.A.6.a Packet Pg. 1560 Attachment: 09-07-21 - Inglesia CU Staff Report (19906 : PL20190001326 Iglesia Pentecostes Peniel CU) CU-PL20190001326; Iglesia Pentecostes Peniel Golden Gate Conditional Use Page 5 of 12 September 7, 2021 SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING: This section of the staff report identifies the land uses and zoning classifications for properties surrounding the boundaries of the subject property, which is undeveloped and zoned Estates with a Wellfield Risk Management Special Treatment Overlay Zone W-4 (ST/W-4). North: Single family home, Estates Zoning District with a Wellfield Risk Management Special Treatment Overlay Zone W-4 (ST/W-4). Note: The owner of this property submitted a letter of support for the petition, provided in Attachment B. East: 8th Street NE R-O-W, Single family home, Estates Zoning District with a Wellfield Risk Management Special Treatment Overlay Zone W-4 (ST/W-4). South: 22nd Avenue NE R-O-W, undeveloped, Estates Zoning District with a Wellfield Risk Management Special Treatment Overlay Zone W-4 (ST/W-4). West: Single family home, Estates Zoning District with a Wellfield Risk Management Special Treatment Overlay Zone W-4 (ST/W-4). Subject Site 9.A.6.a Packet Pg. 1561 Attachment: 09-07-21 - Inglesia CU Staff Report (19906 : PL20190001326 Iglesia Pentecostes Peniel CU) CU-PL20190001326; Iglesia Pentecostes Peniel Golden Gate Conditional Use Page 6 of 12 September 7, 2021 GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN (GMP) CONSISTENCY: Comprehensive Planning staff reviewed this request and offered the following comments: Future Land Use Element (FLUE): The subject property is designated Estates, Mixed Use District, Residential Estates Subdistrict as depicted on the Future Land Use Map (FLUM) in the in the Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan of the Growth Management Plan (GMP). The present Estates, Mixed Use District, Residential Estates Subdistrict designation allows single-family residential development at a maximum density of one unit per 2.25 gross acres. Generally, the Estates Designation also accommodates future non-residential uses, including: a. Conditional uses and essential services as defined in the Land Development Code, except as prohibited in the Neighborhood Center Subdistrict per the Conditional Uses Subdistrict. Conditional Use Subdistrict Various types of conditional uses are permitted in the Estates zoning district within the Rural Golden Gate Estates area. In order to control the location and spacing of new conditional uses, one of four criteria shall be met. The application does not meet any of the four criteria. The Conditional Use request is a companion to a small scale GMP Amendment (PL20190001333). This Conditional Use petition may only be deemed consistent with the Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan of the Growth Management Plan, if the companion GMPA (PL2019001333) is approved and goes in effect. Then the Conditional Use petition will be consistent with the GMP. Policy 1.1.8 of Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element specifies the procedural requirement for conditional uses in Rural Golden Gate Estates: To obtain Conditional Use approval, a super majority vote (minimum of 4 votes) by the Board of Zoning Appeals shall be required. Based upon the above GMP Policy, the petition conforms with allowances in the Future Land Use Element and is required to be heard by the CCPC and the BZA, with a super majority vote required for approval. Transportation Element: The project is consistent with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the Growth Management Plan, which states: “The County Commission shall review all rezone petitions, SRA designation applications, conditional use petitions, and proposed amendments to the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) affecting the overall countywide density or intensity of permissible development, with consideration of their impact on the overall County transportation system, and shall not approve any petition or application that would directly access a deficient roadway segment as identified in the current AUIR or if it impacts an adjacent roadway segment that is deficient 9.A.6.a Packet Pg. 1562 Attachment: 09-07-21 - Inglesia CU Staff Report (19906 : PL20190001326 Iglesia Pentecostes Peniel CU) CU-PL20190001326; Iglesia Pentecostes Peniel Golden Gate Conditional Use Page 7 of 12 September 7, 2021 as identified in the current AUIR, or which significantly impacts a roadway segment or adjacent roadway segment that is currently operating and/or is projected to operate below an adopted Level of Service Standard within the five year AUIR planning period, unless specific mitigating stipulations are also approved. A petition or application has significant im pacts if the traffic impact statement reveals that any of the following occur: a. For links (roadway segments) directly accessed by the project where project traffic is equal to or exceeds 2% of the adopted LOS standard service volume; b. For links adjacent to links directly accessed by the project where project traffic is equal to or exceeds 2% of the adopted LOS standard service volume; and c. For all other links the project traffic is considered to be significant up to the point where it is equal to or exceeds 3% of the adopted LOS standard service volume. Mitigating stipulations shall be based upon a mitigation plan prepared by the applicant and submitted as part of the traffic impact statement that addresses the project’s significant impacts on all roadways.” According to the TIS provided with this petition dated (revised) August 6, 2020, the proposed church will generate a projected total of +/- 8 PM weekday, peak hour, 2-way trips on the adjacent roadway 8th Street Northeast which is classified as a major collector by FDOT. The closest major road segments tracked in the current 2020 AUIR are Golden Gate Boulevard from Wilson Blvd to 8th St., segment ID 123.0, currently operating at a LOS “C” with a remaining capacity of 845 trips and a peak capacity service volume of 2,300 with a peak direction being East. The next road segment is Golden Gate Boulevard from 8th St. to Everglades Boulevard, segment ID 123.1, currently operating at a LOS “C” with a remaining capacity of 855 trips and a peak capacity service volume of 2,300 with a peak direction being East. The next road segment is Randall Boulevard from Immokalee Road to Everglades, segment ID 132, currently operating at a LOS “D” with a remaining capacity of 7 trips and a peak capacity service volume of 900 with a peak direction being East. Staff notes that there is an expected deficiency due to traffic counts in 2022 as well as a deficiency due to trip bank in 2021 for this segment. There is a funded road improvement project for Randall scheduled for completion within the 5-year planning window as well as an FDOT funded improvement for the intersection of Immokalee Road and Randall Boulevard also within the same 5-year planning window. Following state Statute 169.3180, any facility determined to be transportation deficient with existing, committed and vested trips plus background trips, shall require the costs for said deficiency to be the responsibility of Collier County. For these reasons Transportation Planning staff find that the Conditional Use can be found consistent with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the Growth Management Plan. Conservation & Coastal Management Element (CCME): The acreage of native vegetation on site has been field verified by staff. The project is currently zoned Estates with a Wellfield Risk Management Special Treatment Overlay Zone W-4 (ST/W-4). The proposed Conditional Use will not affect the requirements of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME) of the GMP. Native vegetation on site will be retained in accordance with the requirements of CCME Policy 6.1.1 and section 3.05.07 of the LDC. Environmental Services staff recommends approval. 9.A.6.a Packet Pg. 1563 Attachment: 09-07-21 - Inglesia CU Staff Report (19906 : PL20190001326 Iglesia Pentecostes Peniel CU) CU-PL20190001326; Iglesia Pentecostes Peniel Golden Gate Conditional Use Page 8 of 12 September 7, 2021 GMP Conclusion: This Conditional Use petition may only be deemed consistent with the Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan of the Growth Management Plan, if the companion GMPA (PL2019001333) is approved and goes in effect. Then the Conditional Use petition will be consistent with the GMP. STAFF ANALYSIS: Staff has completed a comprehensive evaluation of this land use petition including the criteria upon which a recommendation must be based. This evaluation is completed as part of the Zoning and Land Development Review provided below. In addition, staff offers the following analyses: Environmental Review: Native vegetation on site will be retained in accordance with the requirements of CCME Policy 6.1.1 and section 3.05.07 of the LDC. Environmental Services staff recommends approval. Transportation Review: Transportation Planning staff has reviewed the petition request, the Conditional Use document and Master Plan for right-of-way and access issues and recommends approval. Landscape Review: The buffers shown on the concept plan are consistent with the requirements of the LDC and GMP. In cases where proposed buffers do not meet LDC requirements, staff generally requires supplemental planting as a means to mitigate for the buffer deficiency and provide an alternative that is at least equivalent to the LDC required buffer. Since the buffers shown on the concept plan are consistent with the LDC, any supplemental planting provided at time of SDP would be above and beyond LDC requirements. Conditional Use Findings: Before any Conditional Use recommendation can be offered to the Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA), the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) must make findings that: 1) approval of the Conditional Use will not adversely affect the public interest and will not adversely affect other property of uses in the same district of neighborhood; and 2) all specific requirements for the individual Conditional Use will be met; and 3) satisfactory provisions have been made concerning the following matters, where applicable: 1. Consistency with the Land Development Code (LDC) and the Growth Management Plan (GMP). With the approval of the companion small scale GMP Amendment, the request can be found consistent with the GMP. LDC Section 2.03.01.B.1.c. states: For Estates zoning within the Golden Gate Estates subdivision, the Golden Gate Area Master Plan in the GMP restricts the location of conditional uses. 9.A.6.a Packet Pg. 1564 Attachment: 09-07-21 - Inglesia CU Staff Report (19906 : PL20190001326 Iglesia Pentecostes Peniel CU) CU-PL20190001326; Iglesia Pentecostes Peniel Golden Gate Conditional Use Page 9 of 12 September 7, 2021 Churches are listed as conditional uses in the Estates district (E), subject to the standards and procedures established in LDC section 10.08.00. The site associated with this Conditional Use request does not satisfy locational restrictions and therefore is dependent upon the approval of the companion Growth Management Plan Amendment to provide for the subject property to seek a conditional use for a church. With the conditions proposed by the petitioner and by staff, this project will be in compliance with the applicable provisions of the Land Development Code (LDC) related to development standards, access, landscaping, buffering, water management, required preservation, and parking. 2. Ingress and egress to the property and proposed structures thereon, with particular reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, and access in case of fire or catastrophe. Ingress and egress to the subject property will be limited to a single access point as shown on the conceptual site plan. The TIS submitted by the applicant indicates that the adjacent roadway network has sufficient capacity to accommodate this project within the 5-year planning period as noted above and not adversely impact the surrounding roadway network. The property fronts on 8th Street NE, which is classified as a major collector by FDOT. The conceptual plan shows the majority of the corner of 8th Street NE and 22nd Avenue NE is occupied with preserve and natural buffer area, which will help retain a natural vegetated view along the 8th Street NE corridor in perpetuity. One full access is proposed along 22nd Avenue NE, which is a two lane local road. This proposed conceptual plan results in a single driveway where two would be expected and allowed to access each of the 2.5 acre parcels. The segment of 22nd Avenue NE will be accessed by the site is a dead-end street, which extends approximately three-fifths (3/5) a mile between the intersection with 8th Street NE and the western terminus with a north/south drainage canal. Access to the wider transportation system is provided via the collector roadway 8th Street NE which connects to Randall Boulevard to the north and Golden Gate Boulevard West to the south. 3. The effect the Conditional Use would have on neighboring properties in relation to noise, glare, economic or odor effects. Per the Golden Gate Area Master Plan and Rural Estates Sub-Element, this location is not eligible for a conditional use. Limitations on conditional use locations in the Rural Estates is designed to maintain rural character of the area. As noted, a companion GMP Amendment is proposed to establish a site-specific subdistrict that would allow for seeking a conditional use for a church at this location. While a church is generally not considered incompatible in proximity to residential areas, staff recognizes that preservation of bucolic character in the Rural Golden Gate Estates is a priority identified in the GMP and voiced by residents. 9.A.6.a Packet Pg. 1565 Attachment: 09-07-21 - Inglesia CU Staff Report (19906 : PL20190001326 Iglesia Pentecostes Peniel CU) CU-PL20190001326; Iglesia Pentecostes Peniel Golden Gate Conditional Use Page 10 of 12 September 7, 2021 During staff’s review of this petition, staff put extra focus and attention on setbacks, buffers, days and hours of operations, limitation of onsite activities and functions, limitation on accessory uses, limitation on number of special events, traffic considerations, and control of noise and lighting impacts to ensure compatibility is addressed. The petitioner responded to address neighborhood compatibility with the following adjustments: • Maximum seating reduced from 250 seats to 100 seats • Building size reduced from 9,000 square feet to 5,000 square feet • Parking lot reduced from 108 parking spaces to 45 parking spaces (including at least 25% to be grass parking spaces as allowed by LDC) • Buffers to adjacent residential properties expanded from 15’ Type B buffer to the north and west to be five times wider with a 75-foot wide native buffer that meets Type B screening standards (80 percent opaque within one year at a height of at least six feet) These adjustments reduce the impacts of traffic by reducing intensity of use and expand the level of buffering to maintain natural vegetated conditions at the perimeters of the property. This context sensitive site design along with the number of conditions proposed by the petitioner and recommended by staff combine to provide a high degree of control on the physical and operational aspects of the proposed church and ensure compatibility with the surrounding rural residential area. 4. Compatibility with adjacent properties and other property in the district. The petitioner and staff propose a number of conditions related to setbacks, buffers, amplified sound, days of operation, hours of operation per day, limited number of special events, a trip cap and prohibitions of uses and accessory uses including prohibition of leasing the facility to outside groups. A specific condition of approval recommended by staff and required by the companion GMP Amendment restricts the proposed church from offering Day care services, Private schools, Soup kitchens and Homeless shelters. The context sensitive site design along with the number of conditions proposed by the petitioner and recommended by staff combine to provide a high degree of control on the physical and operational aspects of the proposed church and ensure compatibility with the surrounding rural residential area. Based on the above findings, this conditional use should be recommended for approval with the conditions as outlined in this staff report. ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL (EAC) RECOMMENDATION: The EAC did not review this petition because the site is under the size threshold (10 acres) to require an Environmental Impact Statement. 9.A.6.a Packet Pg. 1566 Attachment: 09-07-21 - Inglesia CU Staff Report (19906 : PL20190001326 Iglesia Pentecostes Peniel CU) CU-PL20190001326; Iglesia Pentecostes Peniel Golden Gate Conditional Use Page 11 of 12 September 7, 2021 NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING (NIM) & PUBLIC CORRESPONDENCE: The NIM was held on April 29, 2021 at Iglesia Pentecostes Peniel Church at 13260 Immokalee Road, Suite 7. See the Applicant’s Backup Material (Attachment B) for the sign in sheet indicating roughly 73 attendees and the summary of the NIM. No commitments were made by the applicant during the NIM. The presentation included an explanation of the site plan and description of the building as a one-story building. Some comments were made in favor of the church as an asset to the community. Most comments raised by attendees were focused on preserving rural character and controlling introduction of uses such as churches in this location. Comprehensive Planning staff received a signed petition with approximately 59 signatures supporting this project, and also a signed petition with approximately 260 signatures opposing this project. Both petition letters may be found in the CCPC agenda packet for the companion GMPA- PL20190001333. The owner of the residential property abutting the site to the north at 2271 8th Street also submitted a letter of support for the petition, provided in Attachment B. COUNTY ATTORNEY OFFICE REVIEW: The County Attorney Office has reviewed the staff report on Sept. 2, 2021. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) forward Petition CU- PL20190001326 to the Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA) with a recommendation of approval subject to the two-page Conceptual Site Plan accompanying the draft Resolution and the additional conditions listed below. This petition is subject to approval of the companion small scale Growth Management Plan (GMP) Amendment PL20190001333. In addition to the eleven Conditions of Approval incorporated in Exhibit C of the draft Resolution, the following conditions #12-16 are also recommended by staff for incorporation in the final Resolution: 12. The two parcels shall be combined for both parcels to be eligible for the 37.5-foot setback reduction that is afforded to corner lots per LDC Sec. 2.03.01.B.2. 13. Site lighting shall adhere to applicable LDC standards with the following conditions: a. Site lighting will be Dark Sky compliant with flat panel and full cut off fixtures. b. Site lighting will have a maximum height of 25-feet. c. Project site light poles, structures and fixtures will be shielded away from residential property lines. 14. Special events are limited to one (1) special event quarterly, not to exceed four (4) per calendar year, must be operated by the church, and are subject to a Temporary Use Permit as required, in accordance with the LDC. 9.A.6.a Packet Pg. 1567 Attachment: 09-07-21 - Inglesia CU Staff Report (19906 : PL20190001326 Iglesia Pentecostes Peniel CU) CU-PL20190001326; Iglesia Pentecostes Peniel Golden Gate Conditional Use Page 12 of 12 September 7, 2021 15. Outdoor amplified music or sounds are prohibited, unless permitted under a Temporary Use Permit for a special event. 16. Day care services, Private schools, Soup kitchens and Homeless shelters are not included in this conditional use approval and shall not be offered on site. Attachments: A. Resolution B. Applicant Back Up Material 9.A.6.a Packet Pg. 1568 Attachment: 09-07-21 - Inglesia CU Staff Report (19906 : PL20190001326 Iglesia Pentecostes Peniel CU) 9.A.6.b Packet Pg. 1569 Attachment: ATTACHMENT A - Resolution - 090121(1) (19906 : PL20190001326 Iglesia Pentecostes Peniel CU) 9.A.6.b Packet Pg. 1570 Attachment: ATTACHMENT A - Resolution - 090121(1) (19906 : PL20190001326 Iglesia Pentecostes Peniel CU) 9.A.6.b Packet Pg. 1571 Attachment: ATTACHMENT A - Resolution - 090121(1) (19906 : PL20190001326 Iglesia Pentecostes Peniel CU) 9.A.6.b Packet Pg. 1572 Attachment: ATTACHMENT A - Resolution - 090121(1) (19906 : PL20190001326 Iglesia Pentecostes Peniel CU) 9.A.6.b Packet Pg. 1573 Attachment: ATTACHMENT A - Resolution - 090121(1) (19906 : PL20190001326 Iglesia Pentecostes Peniel CU) 9.A.6.b Packet Pg. 1574 Attachment: ATTACHMENT A - Resolution - 090121(1) (19906 : PL20190001326 Iglesia Pentecostes Peniel CU) COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 5/08/2018 Page 1 of 12 APPLICATION FOR PUBLIC HEARING FOR: CONDITIONAL USE LDC Section 10.08.00 & Code of Laws section 2-83 – 2-90 Chapter 3 C.1 of the Administrative Code PETITION NO (PL) PROJECT NAME DATE PROCESSED A CONDITIONAL USE TO BE HEARD BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION AND BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS A MINOR CONDITIONAL USE TO BE HEARD BY THE OFFICE OF THE HEARING EXAMINER APPLICANT CONTACT INFORMATION Name of Property Owner(s): ______________________________________________________ Name of Applicant if different than owner: __________________________________________ Address: ____________________________City: _____________ State: ________ ZIP: _______ Telephone: ____________________ Cell: ____________________ Fax: ___________________ E-Mail Address: ________________________________________________________________ Name of Agent(s): _____________________________________________________________ Firm: _________________________________________________________________________ Address: ____________________________City: _____________ State: ________ ZIP: _______ Telephone: ____________________ Cell: _____________________ Fax: __________________ E-Mail Address: ________________________________________________________________ BE AWARE THAT COLLIER COUNTY HAS LOBBYIST REGULATIONS. GUIDE YOURSELF ACCORDINGLY AND ENSURE THAT YOU ARE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THESE REGULATIONS. To be completed by staff 9.A.6.c Packet Pg. 1575 Attachment: ATTACHMENT B - Conditional Use - Full Submittal Package (19906 : PL20190001326 Iglesia Pentecostes Peniel CU) COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 5/08/2018 Page 2 of 12 ASSOCIATIONS Required: List all registered Home Owner Association(s) that could be affected by this petition. Provide additional sheets if necessary. Information can be found on the Board of County Commissioner’s website at http://www.colliergov.net/Index.aspx?page=774. Name of Homeowner Association: _________________________________________________ Mailing Address: ____________________________ City: _________ State: ______ ZIP: ______ Name of Homeowner Association: _________________________________________________ Mailing Address: ____________________________ City: _________ State: ______ ZIP: ______ Name of Homeowner Association: _________________________________________________ Mailing Address: ____________________________ City: _________ State: ______ ZIP: ______ Name of Homeowner Association: _________________________________________________ Mailing Address: ____________________________ City: _________ State: ______ ZIP: ______ Name of Homeowner Association: _________________________________________________ Mailing Address: ____________________________ City: _________ State: ______ ZIP: ______ PROPERTY INFORMATION On separate page, provide a detailed legal description of the property covered by the application: •If the request involves changes to more than one zoning district, the applicant shall include separate legal description for property involved in each district; •The applicant shall submit 4 copies of a recent survey (completed within the last six months, maximum 1" to 400' scale), if required to do so at the pre-application meeting; and •The applicant is responsible for supplying the correct legal description. If questions arise concerning the legal description, an engineer's certification or sealed survey may be required. Property I.D. Number: ____________________________ Plat Book: _______ Page #: _______ Section/Township/Range: _______ /_______ /_______ Subdivision: __________________________________________Lot: ________ Block: ________ Metes & Bounds Description: _____________________________________________________ Size of Property: _____ft. X ______ ft. = _______ Total Sq. Ft. Acres: _____________ Address/ General Location of Subject Property: ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ 9.A.6.c Packet Pg. 1576 Attachment: ATTACHMENT B - Conditional Use - Full Submittal Package (19906 : PL20190001326 Iglesia Pentecostes Peniel CU) COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 5/08/2018 Page 3 of 12 ADJACENT ZONING AND LAND USE Zoning Land Use N S E W If the owner of the subject property owns contiguous property please provide a detailed legal description of the entire contiguous property: (If space is inadequate, attach on a separate page) Section/Township/Range: / / Lot: Block: Subdivision: __________________________________________ Plat Book: Page #: Property I.D. Number: ____________________________ Metes & Bounds Description: ________________________________________________ CONDITIONAL USE REQUEST DETAIL Type of Conditional Use: This application is requesting a conditional use as allowed, pursuant to LDC section 2.03.00, of the _______________________ zoning district for _______________________ (type of use). Present Use of the Property: __________________________________________ 9.A.6.c Packet Pg. 1577 Attachment: ATTACHMENT B - Conditional Use - Full Submittal Package (19906 : PL20190001326 Iglesia Pentecostes Peniel CU) COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 5/08/2018 Page 4 of 12 EVALUATION CRITERIA Pursuant to LDC section 10.08.00 and Chapter 3 C.1 of the Administrative Code, staff’s recommendation to the reviewing body shall be based upon a finding that the granting of the conditional use will not adversely affect the public interest and that the specific requirements governing the individual conditional use, if any, have been met. Further, satisfactory provision and arrangement have been made concerning the following matters, where applicable. On a separate page, provide a narrative statement describing a request for a conditional use and a detailed response to the criteria listed below. Specify how and why the request is consistent with each of the criteria. a. Describe how the project is consistent with the Collier County Land Development Code and Growth Management Plan. Include information on how the request is consistent with the applicable section or portions of the Future Land Use Element. b. Describe the existing or planned means of ingress and egress to the property and proposed structure thereon with particular reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, and access in case of fire or catastrophe. c. Describe the effect the conditional use will have on neighboring properties in relation to noise, glare, economic impact, and odor. d. Describe the site’s and the proposed use’s compatibility with adjacent properties and o ther properties in the district. e. Please provide any additional information which you may feel is relevant to this request. Deed Restrictions: The County is legally precluded from enforcing deed restrictions; however, many communities have adopted such restrictions. You may wish to contact the civic or property owners association in the area for which this use is being requested in order to ascertain whether or not the request is affected by existing deed restrictions. Previous land use petitions on the subject property: To your knowledge, has a public hearing been held on this property within the last year? If so, what was the nature of that hearing? _____________________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________ Official Interpretations or Zoning Verifications: To your knowledge, has there been an official interpretation or zoning verification rendered on this property within the last year? No Yes (If yes please provide copies.) 9.A.6.c Packet Pg. 1578 Attachment: ATTACHMENT B - Conditional Use - Full Submittal Package (19906 : PL20190001326 Iglesia Pentecostes Peniel CU) COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 5/08/2018 Page 5 of 12 STATEMENT OF UTILITY PROVISIONS FOR CONDITIONAL USE REQUEST APPLICANT INFORMATION Name of Applicant(s): ___________________________________________________________ Address: ______________________________City: ___________ State: ________ ZIP: _______ Telephone: ____________________ Cell: _____________________ Fax: __________________ E-Mail Address: ________________________________________________________________ Address of Subject Property (If available): ___________________________________________ City: ________________ State: __________ ZIP: ___________ LEGAL DESCRIPTION Section/Township/Range: / / Lot: Block: Subdivision: _______________________________________________ Plat Book: Page #: Property I.D. Number: _________________________________ Metes & Bounds Description: _____________________________________________________ TYPE OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL TO BE PROVIDED Check applicable system: a.County Utility System b.City Utility System c.Franchised Utility System Provide Name: ____________________ d.Package Treatment Plant (GPD Capacity): ___________________ e.Septic System TYPE OF WATER SERVICE TO BE PROVIDED a.County Utility System b.City Utility System c.Franchised Utility System PROVIDE NAME_______________ d.Private System (Well) Total Population to be served: ____________________________________________________ Peak and Average Daily Demands: A.Water-Peak: _______ Average Daily: ________ B.Sewer-Peak: _______ Average Daily: ________ 9.A.6.c Packet Pg. 1579 Attachment: ATTACHMENT B - Conditional Use - Full Submittal Package (19906 : PL20190001326 Iglesia Pentecostes Peniel CU) COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 5/08/2018 Page 6 of 12 If proposing to be connected to Collier County Regional Water System, please provide the date service is expected to be required: ____________________________________________ Narrative statement: Provide a brief and concise narrative statement and schematic drawing of sewage treatment process to be used as well as a specific statement regarding the method of affluent and sludge disposal. If percolation ponds are to be used, then percolation data and soil involved shall be provided from tests prepared and certified by a professional engineer. ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ County Utility Dedication Statement: If the project is located within the service boundaries of Collier County’s utility service system, a notarized statement shall be provided agreeing to dedicate the water distribution and sewage collection facilities within the project area to the Collier County Utilities. This shall occur upon completion of the construction of these facilities in accordance with all applicable County ordinances in effect at that time. This statement shall also include an agreement that the applicable system development charges and connection fees will be paid to the County Utilities Division prior to the issuance of building permits by the County. If applicable, the statement shall contain an agreement to dedicate the appropriate utility easements for serving the water and sewer systems. ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ Statement of Availability Capacity from other Providers: Unless waived or otherwise provided for at the pre-application meeting, if the project is to receive sewer or potable water services from any provider other than the County, a statement from that provider indicating adequate capacity to serve the project shall be provided. 9.A.6.c Packet Pg. 1580 Attachment: ATTACHMENT B - Conditional Use - Full Submittal Package (19906 : PL20190001326 Iglesia Pentecostes Peniel CU) COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 5/08/2018 Page 7 of 12 RECORDING OF DEVELOPER COMMITMENTS Within 30 days of adoption of the Ordinance, the owner or developer at their expense shall record in the Public Records of Collier County a Memorandum of Understanding of Developer Commitments or Notice of Developer Commitments that contains the legal description of the property that is the subject of the land use petition and contains each and every commitment of the owner or developer specified in the Ordinance. The Memorandum or Notice shall be in form acceptable to the County and shall comply with the recording requirements of F.S. §695. A recorded copy of the Memorandum or Notice shall be provided to the assigned Principal Planner, Zoning Services Department, within 15 days of recording of said Memorandum or Notice. Chapter 8 of the Administrative Code requires that the applicant must remove their public hearing advertising sign(s) after final action is taken by the Board of County Commissioners. Based on the Board's final action on this item, please remove all public hearing advertising sign(s) immediately. 9.A.6.c Packet Pg. 1581 Attachment: ATTACHMENT B - Conditional Use - Full Submittal Package (19906 : PL20190001326 Iglesia Pentecostes Peniel CU) COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 5/08/2018 Page 8 of 12 Pre-Application Meeting and Final Submittal Requirement Checklist for: A Conditional Use to be heard by the Planning Commission and Board of Zoning Appeals A Minor Conditional Use to be heard by the Office of the Hearing Examiner Chapter 3 C.1. of the Administrative Code The following Submittal Requirement Checklist is to be utilized during the Pre-Application Meeting, and at time of application submittal. At time of submittal, the checklist is to be completed and submitted with the application packet. Please provide the submittal items in the exact order listed below, with cover sheets attached to each section. Incomplete submittals will not be accepted. Requirements for Review # Of Copies Required Not Required Completed Application (download current form from County website) 1 Cover letter briefly explaining the project 1 Pre-Application Notes 1 Affidavit of Authorization, signed and notarized 1 Completed Addressing Checklist 1 Property Ownership Disclosure Form 1 Warranty Deed(s) 1 Boundary Survey 1 Conceptual Site Plan 24” X 36” plus (one 8 ½ X 11 copy) Plans showing proposed location for utilities, if required Plans for screening and buffering the use with reference as to type, dimensions, and character, if required Plans showing the proposed landscaping and provisions for trees protected by County regulations, if required Plans showing the proposed signs and lighting, including type, dimensions, and character, if required Architectural Rendering of Proposed Structure(s), if applicable 1 Current aerial photographs (available from Property Appraiser) with project boundary and, if vegetated, FLUCFCS Codes with legend included on aerial. 1 Statement of utility provisions (with all required attachments & sketches) 1 Environmental Data Requirements, pursuant to LDC section 3.08.00 1 Environmental Data Requirements collated into a single Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) at time of public hearings. Coordinate with project planner at time of public hearing. Listed Species Survey; less than 12 months old. Include copies of previous surveys. 1 Traffic Impact Study (TIS) or waiver 1 Historical and Archeological Survey, or waiver 1 Electronic copy of all documents and plans * Please advise: The Office of the Hearing Examiner requires all materials to be submitted electronically in PDF format. 1 * If located in the Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Area, include an additional set of each submittal requirement 9.A.6.c Packet Pg. 1582 Attachment: ATTACHMENT B - Conditional Use - Full Submittal Package (19906 : PL20190001326 Iglesia Pentecostes Peniel CU) COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 5/08/2018 Page 9 of 12 ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PUBLIC HEARING PROCESS: •Following the completion of the review process by County review staff, the applicant shall submit all materials electronically to the designated project manager. •Please contact the project manager to confirm the number of additional copies required. Planners: Indicate if the petition needs to be routed to the following additional reviewers: Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment: Executive Director Emergency Management: Dan Summers; and/or EMS: Artie Bay Conservancy of SWFL: Nichole Johnson GMD Graphics City of Naples: Robin Singer, Planning Director Utilities Engineering: Eric Fey Parks and Recreation: Barry Williams Immokalee Water/Sewer District: Other: School District (Residential Components): Amy Lockheart Communication Towers: Mosquito Control Collier County Airport Authority Naples Airport Authority Commercial Mining: Impact Fees 9.A.6.c Packet Pg. 1583 Attachment: ATTACHMENT B - Conditional Use - Full Submittal Package (19906 : PL20190001326 Iglesia Pentecostes Peniel CU) 9.A.6.c Packet Pg. 1584 Attachment: ATTACHMENT B - Conditional Use - Full Submittal Package (19906 : PL20190001326 Iglesia Pentecostes Peniel CU) COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 5/08/2018 Page 11 of 12 Public Participation Requirements LDC Section 10.03.06 B. or C. Chapter 8 of the Administrative Code Notice for Minor Conditional Use Petitions Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM) Requirements: Applicant must conduct a NIM at least 15 days prior to the Hearing Examiner’s receipt of the staff report and application materials in accordance with the applicable sections of the Administrative Code. The NIM shall be advertised and a mailed written notice shall be given to the property owners in the notification area at least 15 days prior to the NIM meeting. Mailed Notice: Written notice shall be sent to property owners in the notification area at least 15 days before the advertised Hearing Examiner hearing. Newspaper Advertisements: The legal advertisement shall be published at least 15 days before the advertised Hearing Examiner hearing in a newspaper of general circulation. The advertisement shall include at a minimum: •Date, time, and location of the hearing; •Description of the proposed land uses; and •2 in. x 3 in. map of the project location. Sign: A sign shall be posted at least 15 days before the advertised Hearing Examiner hearing date. Public Hearing for Minor Conditional Use Petitions Hearing Examiner: The Hearing Examiner shall hold at least 1 advertised public hearing. See Chapter 9 of the Administrative Code for the Office of the Hearing Examiner procedures. Notice for Conditional Use Petitions Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM) Requirements: Applicant must conduct a NIM at least 15 days prior to the advertised public hearing. The NIM shall be advertised and a mailed written notice shall be given to the property owners in the notification area at least 15 days prior to the NIM meeting. 9.A.6.c Packet Pg. 1585 Attachment: ATTACHMENT B - Conditional Use - Full Submittal Package (19906 : PL20190001326 Iglesia Pentecostes Peniel CU) COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 5/08/2018 Page 12 of 12 Mailed Notice: Written notice shall be sent to property owners in the notification area at least 15 days before the advertised public hearing. Newspaper Advertisements: The legal advertisement shall be published at least 15 days before the advertised public hearing in a newspaper of general circulation. The advertisement shall include at a minimum: •Date, time, and location of the hearing; •Description of the proposed land uses; and •2 in. x 3 in. map of the project location. Sign: A sign shall be posted at least 15 days before the advertised public hearing date. Public Hearing for Conditional Use Petitions Environmental Advisory Committee (EAC): The EAC shall hold at least 1 advertised public hearing, if required. Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC): The CCPC shall hold at least 1 public hearing. Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA): The BZA shall hold at least 1 advertised public hearing. 9.A.6.c Packet Pg. 1586 Attachment: ATTACHMENT B - Conditional Use - Full Submittal Package (19906 : PL20190001326 Iglesia Pentecostes Peniel CU) Page 1 of 2 800 Harbour Drive, Suite 210, Naples, FL 34103 • (O) 239-649-1551 • (F) 239-649-7112 info@rdafl.com • www.rdafl.com Exhibit K – Conditional Use Application Narrative Statement a. Describe how the project is consistent with the Collier County Land Development Code and Growth Management Plan. Include information on how the request is consistent with the applicable section or portions of the Future Land Use Element. The proposed project has been designed to be within compliance with the Collier County Land Development Code and Growth Management Plan. The proposed project has also been designed in accordance with South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) standards. All parking has been designed to be in accordance with Collier County LDC Section 4.5.00 and has been designed within ADA compliance. All Stormwater management facilities have been designed to be in accordance with Collier County LDC Section 6.05.00. All other onsite improvements have been designed to be in accordance with the applicable sections of the Collier County LDC and SFWMD Handbook. Please note that the proposed design has protected all wetlands that were found onsite and will protect them in perpetuity. b. Describe the existing or planned means of ingress and egress to the property and proposed structure thereon with particular reference to automotive and pedestrian safety and convenience, traffic flow and control, and access in case of fire or catastrophe. The planned means of ingress and egress to the property will be located on 22nd Ave NE. The ingress and egress point will be built to the current Collier County Land Development Code standards and adhere to all local jurisdictions. The site’s parking lot will be accessible to the local fire jurisdiction per the current NFPA standards and local fire department requirements. Please reference the Traffic Impact Statement prepared by JMB Transportation for additional information. c. Describe the effect the conditional use will have on neighboring properties in relation to noise, glare, economic impact, and odor. The proposed conditional use will have a positive effect on the properties neighboring the project. As the church will operate during limited hours, a maximum of 6 hours on Wednesday and Sunday, the site will largely remain vacant during the week. These limited hours will reduce the amount of noise and glare coming from the church site. The proposed church property will not have a negative economic impact to the neighboring properties. The proposed church property will not have a negative odor impact to the neighboring properties. In addition, please reference the enclosed letter of support from the adjacent property owner who supports the approval of this Conditional Use and GMPA application. d. Describe the site’s and the proposed use’s compatibility with adjacent properties and other properties in the district. The proposed conditional use to allow for the use of a religious facility is compatible with adjacent properties as the proposed church is a community church with a majority of the congregation living near the proposed site. The existing church congregation is currently meeting approximately 1.2 miles northwest of 9.A.6.c Packet Pg. 1587 Attachment: ATTACHMENT B - Conditional Use - Full Submittal Package (19906 : PL20190001326 Iglesia Pentecostes Peniel CU) Page 2 of 2 800 Harbour Drive, Suite 210, Naples, FL 34103 • (O) 239-649-1551 • (F) 239-649-7112 info@rdafl.com • www.rdafl.com the proposed site within an existing commercial plaza. The congregation has grown over the past few years and the church chose to find a property that was near their current location and close to their members. This site will provide positive support to the local community and will be an exceptional location for the existing church members. e. Please provide any additional information which you may feel is relevant to this request. Please reference the enclosed letter of support for the adjacent neighbor and the location map of adjacent congressional members for the church. 9.A.6.c Packet Pg. 1588 Attachment: ATTACHMENT B - Conditional Use - Full Submittal Package (19906 : PL20190001326 Iglesia Pentecostes Peniel CU) 9.A.6.c Packet Pg. 1589 Attachment: ATTACHMENT B - Conditional Use - Full Submittal Package (19906 : PL20190001326 Iglesia Pentecostes Peniel CU) Ig l esia Pen tecostes Pen i el Adjacent Congres s ional Mem bers within 2 Miles 2 mi N➤➤N © 2018 Google © 2018 Google © 2018 Google 9.A.6.c Packet Pg. 1590 Attachment: ATTACHMENT B - Conditional Use - Full Submittal Package (19906 : PL20190001326 Iglesia Ig l esia Pen tecostes Pen i el Adjacent Congres s ional Mem bers within 5 Miles 4 mi N➤➤N © 2018 Google © 2018 Google © 2018 Google 9.A.6.c Packet Pg. 1591 Attachment: ATTACHMENT B - Conditional Use - Full Submittal Package (19906 : PL20190001326 Iglesia © 2019 Microsoft Corporation © 2019 DigitalGlobe ©CNES (2019) Distrib 24TH AVENUE NE20TH AVENUE NE500 FOOTRADIUS22ND AVENUE NE(COUNTY ROW)8TH STREET NE (COUNTY ROW)SUBJECTPROPERTYZONING: EUSE: RESIDENTIALZONING: E USE: RESIDENTIAL ZONING: EUSE: RESIDENTIALZONING: EUSE: RESIDENTIALPROJECT NO.:IGLESIA PENTECOSTES PENIEL - GOLDEN GATESURROUNDING ZONING & USE MAPSHEET:RDA CONSULTING ENGINEERS800 HARBOUR DRIVE, SUITE #2CNAPLES, FL 34103PHONE: (239) 649-1551FAX: (239) 649-7112WWW.RDAFL.COM1RDA1908400400'200'SCALE: 1" = 400'NSUBJECT ZONING INFORMATIONSUBJECT PROPERTY = 5.15 ACRESEXISTING ZONING = ESTATES (E)EXISTING FLUE = GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLANEXISTING USE = VEGETATED / UNCLEAREDADJACENT PROPERTIES:NORTH ZONING = ESTATES (E) USE = RESIDENTIALSOUTH ZONING = ESTATES (E) USE = VEGETATED / UNCLEAREDEAST ZONING = ESTATES (E) USE = RESIDENTIALWEST ZONING = ESTATES (E) USE = RESIDENTIAL9.A.6.cPacket Pg. 1592Attachment: ATTACHMENT B - Conditional Use - Full Submittal Package (19906 : PL20190001326 Iglesia Pentecostes Peniel CU) 9.A.6.c Packet Pg. 1593 Attachment: ATTACHMENT B - Conditional Use - Full Submittal Package (19906 : PL20190001326 Iglesia Pentecostes Peniel CU) 9.A.6.c Packet Pg. 1594 Attachment: ATTACHMENT B - Conditional Use - Full Submittal Package (19906 : PL20190001326 Iglesia Pentecostes Peniel CU) 9.A.6.c Packet Pg. 1595 Attachment: ATTACHMENT B - Conditional Use - Full Submittal Package (19906 : PL20190001326 Iglesia Pentecostes Peniel CU) 9.A.6.c Packet Pg. 1596 Attachment: ATTACHMENT B - Conditional Use - Full Submittal Package (19906 : PL20190001326 Iglesia Pentecostes Peniel CU) 9.A.6.cPacket Pg. 1597Attachment: ATTACHMENT B - Conditional Use - Full Submittal Package (19906 : PL20190001326 Iglesia Pentecostes Peniel CU) 9.A.6.cPacket Pg. 1598Attachment: ATTACHMENT B - Conditional Use - Full Submittal Package (19906 : PL20190001326 Iglesia Pentecostes Peniel CU) 9.A.6.cPacket Pg. 1599Attachment: ATTACHMENT B - Conditional Use - Full Submittal Package (19906 : PL20190001326 Iglesia Pentecostes Peniel CU) 9.A.6.c Packet Pg. 1600 Attachment: ATTACHMENT B - Conditional Use - Full Submittal Package (19906 : PL20190001326 Iglesia Pentecostes Peniel CU) 9.A.6.c Packet Pg. 1601 Attachment: ATTACHMENT B - Conditional Use - Full Submittal Package (19906 : PL20190001326 Iglesia Pentecostes Peniel CU) 9.A.6.c Packet Pg. 1602 Attachment: ATTACHMENT B - Conditional Use - Full Submittal Package (19906 : PL20190001326 Iglesia Pentecostes Peniel CU) 9.A.6.c Packet Pg. 1603 Attachment: ATTACHMENT B - Conditional Use - Full Submittal Package (19906 : PL20190001326 Iglesia Pentecostes Peniel CU) 800 Harbour Drive, Suite 210, Naples, FL 34103 • 239-649-1551 • info@rdafl.com • www.rdafl.com April 29, 2021 at 6:00 PM Neighborhood Information Meeting Iglesia Pentecostes Peniel Church 13260 Immokalee Road, Suite 7 Naples, FL 34120 Neighborhood Information Meeting – Summary Notes • Meeting was scheduled to start at 6:00PM on 4/29/2021 and was postponed to 6:05PM due to heavy traffic. Ronny called meeting to order at 6:05pm. • Meeting began with Ronny introducing the project location and scope. The Pastor, Jorge Martin, then discussed how the church operated and what kind of church they were. • Ronny corrected news report that stated the building would be 3 stories and stated the proposed building would be 1 story. • Attendee asked who Laura DeJohn was from Collier County. Laura introduced herself and explained the CU & GMPA process to all who attended the meeting. • One neighbor spoke up and asked how many people here live near the project. A majority of people in the NIM raised their hands and multiple people began talking. Laura DeJohn took control of the meeting and Ronny continued to explain the project. • The Pastor, Jorge Martin, explained when their congregation meets. Ronny continued to talk about the specifics for this project (number of seats, square footage, etc.). Pastor Jorge Martin then talked about what this church will bring to the community. • Laura mentioned some people were standing just outside the door, so people shifted in order to allow everyone inside the building for the NIM. • Pastor Jorge Martin then explained Randall Blvd extension that will help alleviate the traffic that is currently experienced in this area. He also explained that their sister church in Naples Park has never experienced a noise compliant even though they are in a residential community. • The meeting was then opened up to community discussion/questions. • Joseph Diaz then spoke about the existing churches on Immokalee Road and asked why this church was not going on Immokalee Road. Pastor explained that the church does not have enough money to build or purchase a building on Immokalee Road. • Two members of the meeting began discussing the traffic concerns loudly and Laura and Ronny had to bring the meeting back under control. • Heidi Sefferon (sp?) then spoke about a church encroaching into the residential area of the estates and how that is undesirable to her. She mentioned that a church go into a more commercial area. • Tony Reyas (sp?) then spoke about potential noise and dirt issues during construction phase of the project. Also mentioned issues with increased traffic. Does not want to see this project built on this property. • Another attendee brought up traffic concerns and Ronny discussed how transportation engineers determine if the project will have a significant impact on the traffic or not through a TIS report. • Dan Brett then asked multiple questions: 9.A.6.c Packet Pg. 1604 Attachment: ATTACHMENT B - Conditional Use - Full Submittal Package (19906 : PL20190001326 Iglesia Pentecostes Peniel CU) 800 Harbour Drive, Suite 210, Naples, FL 34103 • 239-649-1551 • info@rdafl.com • www.rdafl.com o 1st question. How much clearing will occur? Ronny explained that only the developed area for parking, building, stormwater management, etc. will be cleared. Nothing extra and preserve will be maintained. o 2nd question. Any future building planned? Ronny and Pastor explained no. o 3rd question. Any area in estates where a church has been approved , question directed to Laura DeJohn. She did not have an example offhand and explained we are here for this specific project. • Andy (sp?) Garcia, who is an adjacent property owner to the subject property, spoke up in full support of this church project and believes that this project is good for the street. • Miguel Cruz spoke in support of the church and how a church is beneficial for the community. How a church can help reduce crime in kids in a community. • Anthony Weaver spoke about agreeing that church can be a good thing for a community but is opposed to bringing a commercial project to this specific location. Mentioned that they already have a littering problem on this street. Ronny explained that in a typical estate zoning that a church would be allowed with a conditional use application, but this project is more complicated as this application includes a GMPA to allow for a church on this specific property. • Joseph Diaz then spoke about how the meeting needs to stick to facts, not necessarily an individual’s belief in god and if they attend church. Ronny agreed and continued the meeting. • Angus Weaver then spoke up in opposition of the church saying he wants is somewhere else and not in his community. • Teresa Ansbro @ 580 22nd Ave NE then spoke about not supporting the church in this location and she mentioned that she read every document submitted for this application to ensure she was informed about the project. Mentioned how it was better to build communities around a church instead of inserting a church into an existing community. Traffic concerns were also brought up. Environmental concerns were also brought up. • Danielle Krivda @ 1490 8th St NE mentioned how the church that she attends went through this same process in the estate went through a similar process and got approved/built. Mentioned neighbors complain about that church. Had concerns with putting a church in this residential area. Had question about what style of church it was and mentioned the band set. Pastor Jorge Martin explained that this church does not have large noise and invited everyone to attend a church service if they are interested in seeing what the church is about. • Some people started to leave the meeting and Ronny brought up the sign in sheet that was at the front of the room. The individuals leaving did come up to sign in. Eventually clip boards were used and the sign in sheet was passed around. Ronny also mentioned our information was on the agenda if anyone would like to contact with concerns. • Buddy Smith @ 2220 8th St NE asked if there was an agenda for upcoming meeting with Collier County staff. Ronny explained that these meeting dates have not yet been set and that everyone will be informed same as the NIM. The attendee suggested moving the church to a location that gets more traffic so they can get more members. • Another attendee, who was a member of the church, spoke in support of the project and mentioned that the growth in Collier County can not be changed/stopped. Mentioned noise restrictions that the church will be held to if they are too loud. 9.A.6.c Packet Pg. 1605 Attachment: ATTACHMENT B - Conditional Use - Full Submittal Package (19906 : PL20190001326 Iglesia Pentecostes Peniel CU) 800 Harbour Drive, Suite 210, Naples, FL 34103 • 239-649-1551 • info@rdafl.com • www.rdafl.com • Anthony Weaver asked how to have additional people added to notifications for the future meetings. Ronny asked him to send an email with his address and mentioned that he will be included in future notification letters. Mentioned how letters for the NIM were only sent to property owners within 1,000 ft. • Richard Nexti (sp?) @ 2145 8th St NE asked what development area was and mentioned he would be willing to swap/sell his property at 8th St and Randall Blvd to move church location. • There was no additional questions/comments at this time and Ronny then concluded the meeting at 7:05pm. Ronny reminded everyone to sign the sign-in sheet if they were interested. 9.A.6.c Packet Pg. 1606 Attachment: ATTACHMENT B - Conditional Use - Full Submittal Package (19906 : PL20190001326 Iglesia Pentecostes Peniel CU) DocuSign Envelope ID: E2C07B7E-A635-4473-9D20-ACCAC2884557 9.A.6.c Packet Pg. 1607 Attachment: ATTACHMENT B - Conditional Use - Full Submittal Package (19906 : PL20190001326 Iglesia Pentecostes Peniel CU) DocuSign Envelope ID: E2C07B7E-A635-4473-9D20-ACCAC2884557 9.A.6.c Packet Pg. 1608 Attachment: ATTACHMENT B - Conditional Use - Full Submittal Package (19906 : PL20190001326 Iglesia Pentecostes Peniel CU) DocuSign Envelope ID: E2C07B7E-A635-4473-9D20-ACCAC2884557 9.A.6.c Packet Pg. 1609 Attachment: ATTACHMENT B - Conditional Use - Full Submittal Package (19906 : PL20190001326 Iglesia Pentecostes Peniel CU) DocuSign Envelope ID: E2C07B7E-A635-4473-9D20-ACCAC2884557 9.A.6.c Packet Pg. 1610 Attachment: ATTACHMENT B - Conditional Use - Full Submittal Package (19906 : PL20190001326 Iglesia Pentecostes Peniel CU) DocuSign Envelope ID: E2C07B7E-A635-4473-9D20-ACCAC2884557 9.A.6.c Packet Pg. 1611 Attachment: ATTACHMENT B - Conditional Use - Full Submittal Package (19906 : PL20190001326 Iglesia Pentecostes Peniel CU) DocuSign Envelope ID: E2C07B7E-A635-4473-9D20-ACCAC28845579.A.6.cPacket Pg. 1612Attachment: ATTACHMENT B - Conditional Use - Full Submittal Package (19906 : PL20190001326 Iglesia DocuSign Envelope ID: E2C07B7E-A635-4473-9D20-ACCAC2884557 9.A.6.c Packet Pg. 1613 Attachment: ATTACHMENT B - Conditional Use - Full Submittal Package (19906 : PL20190001326 Iglesia Pentecostes Peniel CU) DocuSign Envelope ID: E2C07B7E-A635-4473-9D20-ACCAC2884557 9.A.6.c Packet Pg. 1614 Attachment: ATTACHMENT B - Conditional Use - Full Submittal Package (19906 : PL20190001326 Iglesia Pentecostes Peniel CU) DocuSign Envelope ID: E2C07B7E-A635-4473-9D20-ACCAC2884557 9.A.6.c Packet Pg. 1615 Attachment: ATTACHMENT B - Conditional Use - Full Submittal Package (19906 : PL20190001326 Iglesia Pentecostes Peniel CU) DocuSign Envelope ID: E2C07B7E-A635-4473-9D20-ACCAC2884557 9.A.6.c Packet Pg. 1616 Attachment: ATTACHMENT B - Conditional Use - Full Submittal Package (19906 : PL20190001326 Iglesia Pentecostes Peniel CU) DocuSign Envelope ID: E2C07B7E-A635-4473-9D20-ACCAC28845579.A.6.cPacket Pg. 1617Attachment: ATTACHMENT B - Conditional Use - Full Submittal Package (19906 : PL20190001326 Iglesia DocuSign Envelope ID: E2C07B7E-A635-4473-9D20-ACCAC2884557 9.A.6.c Packet Pg. 1618 Attachment: ATTACHMENT B - Conditional Use - Full Submittal Package (19906 : PL20190001326 Iglesia Pentecostes Peniel CU) DocuSign Envelope ID: E2C07B7E-A635-4473-9D20-ACCAC28845579.A.6.cPacket Pg. 1619Attachment: ATTACHMENT B - Conditional Use - Full Submittal Package (19906 : PL20190001326 Iglesia DocuSign Envelope ID: E2C07B7E-A635-4473-9D20-ACCAC28845579.A.6.cPacket Pg. 1620Attachment: ATTACHMENT B - Conditional Use - Full Submittal Package (19906 : PL20190001326 Iglesia IMMOKALEE PENIEL CHURCH Environmental Data for CU SECTIONS 27, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 27 EAST COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA Prepared For: Prepared By: September 16, 2019 Updated: May 11, 2020 Collier County Growth Management Division 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Earth Tech Environmental, LLC 10600 Jolea Avenue Bonita Springs, FL 34135 239.304.0030 www.eteflorida.com 9.A.6.c Packet Pg. 1621 Attachment: ATTACHMENT B - Conditional Use - Full Submittal Package (19906 : PL20190001326 Iglesia Pentecostes Peniel CU) Environmental Data for CU Earth Tech Environmental, LLC www.eteflorida.com EXHIBITS Figure 1 Location Map Figure 2 Aerial FLUCCS Map Figure 3 Existing Native Vegetation Figure 4 Site Plan with Preserve Figure 5 Anticipated SFWMD Jurisdictional Wetlands Figure 6 Florida Black Bear Map APPENDICES APPENDIX A Collier County CU Pre-App Notes APPENDIX B Protected Species Survey APPENDIX C Earth Tech Environmental Staff Qualifications 9.A.6.c Packet Pg. 1622 Attachment: ATTACHMENT B - Conditional Use - Full Submittal Package (19906 : PL20190001326 Iglesia Pentecostes Peniel CU) Environmental Data for CU Earth Tech Environmental, LLC www.eteflorida.com INTRODUCTION The purpose of this document is to satisfy the Environmental Data requirements (LDC Section 3.08.00) for a Conditional Use (CU) to the Immokalee Peniel Church parcel (Subject Property). This information is in response to the items in the CU Pre-Application Notes as provided by Collier County (see Appendix A). PROPERTY LOCATION The Subject Property for this report consists of two (2) adjacent parcels (Folio #’s 37750560106 & 37750560009). The Subject Property is located on the north side of 22nd Ave NE and immediately west of 8th St NE in Collier County. According to the boundary provided by the engineer, RDA Consulting Engineers, the Subject Property’s combined acreage is approximately 5.15 acres. See Figure 1 below for a location map. Figure 1. Location Map 3 9.A.6.c Packet Pg. 1623 Attachment: ATTACHMENT B - Conditional Use - Full Submittal Package (19906 : PL20190001326 Iglesia Pentecostes Peniel CU) Environmental Data for CU Earth Tech Environmental, LLC www.eteflorida.com ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST- CONDITIONAL USE See page 7 of Collier County Pre-App Notes 1.Is the project in compliance with the overlays, districts and/or zoning on the subject site and/or the surrounding properties? (CON, ST, PUD, RLSA, RFMU, etc.) (LDC 2.03.05-2.03.08; 4.08.00) Not in CV Library The project will be a GMPA and will be in compliance with zoning. 2.Submit a current aerial photograph (available from the Property Appraiser’s office) and clearly delineate the subject site boundary lines. If the site is vegetated, provide FLUCFCS overlay and vegetation inventory identifying upland, wetland and exotic vegetation (Admin. Code Ch. 3 G. 1. Application Contents #24). FLUCCS Overlay -P627 See Figure 2, Aerial FLUCCS Map and vegetation descriptions below. Figure 2. Aerial FLUCCS Map 4 9.A.6.c Packet Pg. 1624 Attachment: ATTACHMENT B - Conditional Use - Full Submittal Package (19906 : PL20190001326 Iglesia Pentecostes Peniel CU) Environmental Data for CU Earth Tech Environmental, LLC www.eteflorida.com Figure 3. Existing Native Vegetation Based on the FLUCCS classification system, the following communities are present on the property: FLUCCS CODE DESCRIPTION ACREAGE 411-E1 Pine Flatwoods (<25% Exotics) 3.51 624-E2 Cypress – Pine – Cabbage Palm (26-50% Exotics) 0.81 814 Roadway 0.83 Site Total: 5.15 E1 = Exotics <25% of total cover E2 = Exotics 26-50% of total cover E3 = Exotics 51-75% of total cover E4 = Exotics >75% of total cover FLUCCS 411-E1, Pine Flatwoods (<25% Exotics) This community comprises the majority of the property. Canopy vegetation consists mostly of slash pine (Pinus elliottii) and scattered cabbage palm (Sabal palmetto). The mid-story is sparse, largely containing saw palmetto with lesser amounts of gallberry (Ilex glabra), rusty staggerbush (Lyonia fruticosa), and winged sumac (Rhus copallinum). The groundcover is largely covered by a dense blanket of grapevine (Vitis rotundifolia), lovevine (Cassytha filiformis), and a thick layer of pine needles. Exotic coverage is relatively low with the ecotone displaying higher abundances of Brazilian pepper (Schinus terebinthifolia). 5 9.A.6.c Packet Pg. 1625 Attachment: ATTACHMENT B - Conditional Use - Full Submittal Package (19906 : PL20190001326 Iglesia Pentecostes Peniel CU) Environmental Data for CU Earth Tech Environmental, LLC www.eteflorida.com FLUCCS 624-E2, Cypress – Pine – Cabbage Palm (26-50% Exotics) This community is found on the southeast portion of the property. It is dominated by large cypress (Taxodium distichum), cabbage palm, and sparse slash pine in the canopy. The mid-story is dominated by dense Brazilian pepper with lesser amounts of myrsine (Myrsine cubana) and cabbage palm. Groundcover contains minimal diversity and consists primarily of swamp fern (Telmatoblechnum serrulatum). Exotic coverage is moderate consisting primarily of dense Brazilian pepper. FLUCCS 814, Roadways Both 8th St NE and 22nd Ave NE along with their associated right-of-way’s are found on the eastern and southern portion of the property. 3.Clearly identify the location of all preserves and label each as “Preserve” on all plans. (LDC 3.05.07.A.2). Preserve Label- P546 See Figure 4 below, Site Plan. Figure 4. Site Plan with Preserve 4.Provide calculations on site plan showing the appropriate acreage of native vegetation to be retained, the max amount and ratios permitted to be created on-site or mitigated off-site. Exclude vegetation located within utility and drainage easements from the preserve calculations (LDC 6 9.A.6.c Packet Pg. 1626 Attachment: ATTACHMENT B - Conditional Use - Full Submittal Package (19906 : PL20190001326 Iglesia Pentecostes Peniel CU) Environmental Data for CU Earth Tech Environmental, LLC www.eteflorida.com 3.05.07.B-D; 3.05.07.F; 3.05.07.H 1.d-e). Preserve Calculation – P547. 15% of existing native vegetation to be preserved. The total existing native vegetation on the site is 4.32 acres. The preserve requirement is 15%. 0.15 * 4.32 = 0.65 acres. The proposed site plan currently depicts a 0.80-acre preserve, which exceeds the requirement (preserve setback was NOT included in preserve calculation). See Figures 3 & 4. 5. Created and retained preserve areas shall meet the minimum width requirements per LDC 3.05.07.H.1.b. Preserve Width – P603 See engineer’s plan set. 6. Retained preservation areas shall be selected based on the criteria defined in LDC 3.05.07.A.3, include all 3 strata, be in the largest contiguous area possible and shall be interconnected within the site and adjoining off-site preservation areas or wildlife corridors. (LDC 3.05.07.A.1-4). Preserve Selection- P550 The site is bordered by roads to the south and the east, and residential development to the north and west. The preserve placement was selected based on existing wetlands (the highest quality habitat) on site. See Figures 3 & 4. 7. Principle structures shall be located a minimum of 25’ from the boundary of the preserve boundary. No accessory structures and other site alterations, fill placement, grading, plant alteration or removal, or similar activity shall be permitted within 10’ of the boundary unless it can be shown that it will not affect the integrity of the preserve (i.e. stem wall or berm around the wetland preserve). Provide cross-sections for each preserve boundary identifying all site alterations within 25’. (LDC 3.05.07.H.3; 6.01.02.C.). Preserve Setback – New See engineer’s plan set. 8. Wildlife survey required for sites where EIS in not required, when so warranted. (LDC 10.02.02.A.2.f) See Appendix B, Protected Species Survey. 9. Provide Environmental Data identifying author credentials, consistency determination with GMPs, off-site preserves, seasonal and historic high-water levels, and analysis of water quality. For land previously used for farm fields or golf course, provide soil sampling/groundwater monitoring reports identifying any site contamination. (LDC 3.08.00) Environmental Data Required – P 522 See Appendix C, ETE Staff Qualifications for author credentials. 10. Master Plan shall state the minimum acreage required to be preserved. (LDC 10.02.13.A.2) Master Plan Contents-P626. With Calculations. See engineer’s plan set. 7 9.A.6.c Packet Pg. 1627 Attachment: ATTACHMENT B - Conditional Use - Full Submittal Package (19906 : PL20190001326 Iglesia Pentecostes Peniel CU) Environmental Data for CU Earth Tech Environmental, LLC www.eteflorida.com ENVIRONMENTAL DATA CHECKLIST – The environmental data requirements can be found in LDC section 3.08.00 See Pages 8-10 of Collier County Pre-App Notes 1.Provide the EIS fee if PUD or CU. Fee will be provided upon submittal. 2.WHO AND WHAT COMPANY PREPARED THE ENVIRONMENTAL DATA REPORT? Preparation of Environmental Data. Environmental Data Submittal Requirements shall be prepared by an individual with academic credentials and experience in the area of environmental sciences or natural resource management. Academic credentials and experience shall be a bachelor's or higher degree in one of the biological sciences with at least two years of ecological or biological professional experience in the State of Florida. See Appendix C, ETE Staff Qualifications for author credentials. 3.Identify on a current aerial, the location and acreage of all SFWMD jurisdictional wetlands according to the Florida Land Use Cover and Forms Classification System (FLUCFCS) and include this information on the SOP or final plat construction plans. Wetlands must be verified by the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) or Florida Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) prior to SDP or final plat construction plans approval. For sites in the RFMU district, provide an assessment in accordance with 3.05.07 F and identify on the FLUCFCS map the location of all high quality wetlands (wetlands having functionality scores of at least 0.65 WRAP or 0.7 UMAM) and their location within the proposed development plan. Sites with high quality wetlands must have their functionality scores have not been verified by either the SFWMD or DEP, scores must be reviewed and accepted by County staff, consistent with State regulation. See Figure 5, Anticipated SFWMD Jurisdictional Wetlands map and vegetation descriptions above. 8 9.A.6.c Packet Pg. 1628 Attachment: ATTACHMENT B - Conditional Use - Full Submittal Package (19906 : PL20190001326 Iglesia Pentecostes Peniel CU) Environmental Data for CU Earth Tech Environmental, LLC www.eteflorida.com Figure 5. Anticipated SFWMD Jurisdictional Wetlands 7.Provide a wildlife survey for the nests of bald eagle and for listed species known to inhabit biological communities similar to those existing on site. The survey shall be conducted in accordance with the guidelines or recommendations of the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FFWCC) and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). Survey times may be reduced or waived where an initial habitat assessment by the environmental consultant indicates that the likelihood of listed species occurrence is low, as determined by the FFWCC and USFWS. Where an initial habitat assessment by the environmental consultant indicates that the likelihood of listed species occurrence is low, the survey time may be reduced or waived by the County Manager or designee, when the project is not reviewed, or technical assistance not provided by the FFWCC and USFWS. Additional survey time may be required if listed species are discovered. Please include review for bonneted bat. See Appendix B, Protected Species Survey. The Subject Property falls within the Florida Bonneted Bat (FBB) Consultation Area. During the species survey, no potential bat cavities were observed. The 5.15- acre property is surrounded by development on all sides. Prior to any development or permitting activities, the US Fish & Wildlife Service (USFWS) may require acoustic surveys to further determine presence or absence of FBB roosts or foraging on the property. 8.Provide a survey for listed plants identified in 3 .04.03 9 9.A.6.c Packet Pg. 1629 Attachment: ATTACHMENT B - Conditional Use - Full Submittal Package (19906 : PL20190001326 Iglesia Pentecostes Peniel CU) Environmental Data for CU Earth Tech Environmental, LLC www.eteflorida.com See Appendix B, Protected Species Survey. Common wild pine (Tillandsia fasciculata) and butterfly orchids (Encyclia tampensis) were observed on the Subject Property. Typically, individual plants are relocated from proposed impact areas into onsite (or offsite) preserves prior to construction. 9.Wildlife habitat management and monitoring plans in accordance with 3.04.00 shall be required where listed species are utilizing the site or where wildlife habitat management and monitoring plans are required by the FFWCC or USFWS. These plans shall describe how the project directs incompatible land uses away from listed species and their habitats. Identify the location of listed species nests, burrows, dens, foraging areas, and the location of any bald eagle nests or nest protection zones on the native vegetation aerial with FLU CFCS overlay for the site. Wildlife habitat management plans shall be included on the SDP or final plat construction plans. Bald eagle management plans are required for sites containing bald eagle nests or nest protection zones, copies of which shall be included on the SDP or final plat construction plans. Include review for black bear activity in and around the subject property and provide exhibit. A Panther Mitigation Analysis and Wood Stork Foraging Analysis will be provided during permitting, if warranted. The property falls within the FWC mapped range for Florida black bear. Telemetry points from tagged bears have been documented on and in the vicinity of the Subject Property. See Figure 6 for black bear mappings as they relate to the Subject Property. The County may require the Client to implement FWC-approved bear-proof waste receptacles on the property. Figure 6. Florida Black Bear Information 10 9.A.6.c Packet Pg. 1630 Attachment: ATTACHMENT B - Conditional Use - Full Submittal Package (19906 : PL20190001326 Iglesia Pentecostes Peniel CU) Environmental Data for CU Earth Tech Environmental, LLC www.eteflorida.com 10. Identify on a current aerial the acreage, location and community types of all upland and wetland habitats on the project site, according to the Florida Land Use Cover and Forms Classification System (FLUCFCS) and provide a legend for each of the FLUCFCS Codes identified. Aerials and overlay information must be legible at the scale provided. Provide calculations for the acreage of native vegetation required to be retained on-site. Include the above referenced calculations and aerials on the SDP or final plat construction plans. In a separate report, demonstrate how the preserve selection criteria pursuant to 3.05.07 have been met. Where applicable, include in this report an aerial showing the project boundaries along with any undeveloped land, preserves, natural flowways or other natural land features, located on abutting properties. See Figures 2 & 5 above. 14. Provide justification for deviations from environmental LDC provisions pursuant to GMP CCME Policy 6.1.1 (13), if requested. N/A 16. Identify any Wellfield Risk Management Special Treatment Overlay Zones (WRM-ST) within the project area and provide an analysis for how the project design avoids the most intensive land uses within the most sensitive WRM-STs and will comply with the WRM-ST pursuant to 3.06.00. Include the location of the Wellfield Risk Management Special Treatment Overlay Zones on the SDP or final plat construction plans. For land use applications such as standard and PUD rezones and CUs, provide a separate site plan or zoning map with the project boundary and Wellfield Risk Management Special Treatment Overlay Zones identified. Clearly provide info regarding which WRM-ST zone property is located. N/A 17. Demonstrate that the design of the proposed Stormwater management system and analysis of water quality and quantity impacts fully incorporate the requirements of the Watershed Management Regulations of 3.07.00. See engineer’s plan set. 20. The County Manager or designee may require additional data or information necessary to evaluate the project’s compliance with LDC and GMP requirements. (LDC 10.02.02.A.3 f) a. Provide overall description of project with respect to environmental and water management issues. See this document. b. Explain how project is consistent with each of the applicable objectives and policies in the CCME of the GMP. See below. 11 9.A.6.c Packet Pg. 1631 Attachment: ATTACHMENT B - Conditional Use - Full Submittal Package (19906 : PL20190001326 Iglesia Pentecostes Peniel CU) Environmental Data for CU Earth Tech Environmental, LLC www.eteflorida.com c.Explain how the project meets or exceeds the native vegetation preservation requirements in the CCME and LDC. See Figure 3, Site Plan and native vegetation/preserve narrative above. d.Indicate wetlands to be impacted and the effects of the impact to their functions and how the project’s design compensates for wetland impacts. Address each one. See Figure 5, Wetland Map above. The wetlands will be preserved; no wetland impacts are associated with the project. e.Indicate how the project design minimizes impacts to listed species. Describe the measures that are proposed as mitigation for impacts to listed species. The preserve is designed to reduce impacts to listed species. See Appendix B - Protected Species Survey. CCME GOAL 6: TO IDENTIFY, PROTECT, CONSERVE AND APPROPRIATELY USE NATIVE VEGETATIVE COMMUNITIES AND WILDLIFE HABITAT. OBJECTIVE 6.1: Protect native vegetative communities through the application of minimum preservation requirements… Per Collier County, the native vegetation requirement is 15%. The project is proposing to preserve 0.80 acres of wetlands and uplands. See Figure 4 above. The total existing native vegetation on the site is 4.32 acres. The preserve requirement is 15%. 0.15 * 4.32 = 0.65 acres. The proposed site plan currently depicts 0.80-acre preserve. See Figure 4. No wetland impacts are occurring onsite, so no mitigation is required. All onsite wetlands will remain. CCME GOAL 7: TO PROTECT AND CONSERVE THE COUNTY’S FISHERIES AND WILDLIFE. OBJECTIVE 7.1: Direct incompatible land uses are directed away from listed species and their habitats… No listed species have been identified on the Subject Property. See Appendix B, Protected Species Survey. A Panther Mitigation Analysis and Wood Stork Foraging Analysis will be provided during permitting, if warranted. The property falls within the FWC mapped range for Florida black bear. Telemetry points from tagged bears have been documented on and in the vicinity of the Subject Property. See Figure 6 for black bear mappings as they relate to the Subject Property. The County may require the Client to implement FWC-approved bear-proof waste receptacles on the property. 12 9.A.6.c Packet Pg. 1632 Attachment: ATTACHMENT B - Conditional Use - Full Submittal Package (19906 : PL20190001326 Iglesia Pentecostes Peniel CU) Environmental Data for CU Earth Tech Environmental, LLC www.eteflorida.com APPENDIX A Collier County CU Pre-App Notes 9.A.6.c Packet Pg. 1633 Attachment: ATTACHMENT B - Conditional Use - Full Submittal Package (19906 : PL20190001326 Iglesia Pentecostes Peniel CU) 9.A.6.c Packet Pg. 1634 Attachment: ATTACHMENT B - Conditional Use - Full Submittal Package (19906 : PL20190001326 Iglesia Pentecostes Peniel CU) 9.A.6.c Packet Pg. 1635 Attachment: ATTACHMENT B - Conditional Use - Full Submittal Package (19906 : PL20190001326 Iglesia Pentecostes Peniel CU) 9.A.6.c Packet Pg. 1636 Attachment: ATTACHMENT B - Conditional Use - Full Submittal Package (19906 : PL20190001326 Iglesia Pentecostes Peniel CU) 9.A.6.c Packet Pg. 1637 Attachment: ATTACHMENT B - Conditional Use - Full Submittal Package (19906 : PL20190001326 Iglesia Pentecostes Peniel CU) 9.A.6.c Packet Pg. 1638 Attachment: ATTACHMENT B - Conditional Use - Full Submittal Package (19906 : PL20190001326 Iglesia Pentecostes Peniel CU) 9.A.6.c Packet Pg. 1639 Attachment: ATTACHMENT B - Conditional Use - Full Submittal Package (19906 : PL20190001326 Iglesia Pentecostes Peniel CU) 9.A.6.c Packet Pg. 1640 Attachment: ATTACHMENT B - Conditional Use - Full Submittal Package (19906 : PL20190001326 Iglesia Pentecostes Peniel CU) 9.A.6.c Packet Pg. 1641 Attachment: ATTACHMENT B - Conditional Use - Full Submittal Package (19906 : PL20190001326 Iglesia Pentecostes Peniel CU) 9.A.6.c Packet Pg. 1642 Attachment: ATTACHMENT B - Conditional Use - Full Submittal Package (19906 : PL20190001326 Iglesia Pentecostes Peniel CU) 9.A.6.c Packet Pg. 1643 Attachment: ATTACHMENT B - Conditional Use - Full Submittal Package (19906 : PL20190001326 Iglesia Pentecostes Peniel CU) 9.A.6.c Packet Pg. 1644 Attachment: ATTACHMENT B - Conditional Use - Full Submittal Package (19906 : PL20190001326 Iglesia Pentecostes Peniel CU) 9.A.6.c Packet Pg. 1645 Attachment: ATTACHMENT B - Conditional Use - Full Submittal Package (19906 : PL20190001326 Iglesia Pentecostes Peniel CU) 9.A.6.c Packet Pg. 1646 Attachment: ATTACHMENT B - Conditional Use - Full Submittal Package (19906 : PL20190001326 Iglesia Pentecostes Peniel CU) 9.A.6.c Packet Pg. 1647 Attachment: ATTACHMENT B - Conditional Use - Full Submittal Package (19906 : PL20190001326 Iglesia Pentecostes Peniel CU) 9.A.6.c Packet Pg. 1648 Attachment: ATTACHMENT B - Conditional Use - Full Submittal Package (19906 : PL20190001326 Iglesia Pentecostes Peniel CU) 9.A.6.c Packet Pg. 1649 Attachment: ATTACHMENT B - Conditional Use - Full Submittal Package (19906 : PL20190001326 Iglesia Pentecostes Peniel CU) 9.A.6.cPacket Pg. 1650Attachment: ATTACHMENT B - Conditional Use - Full Submittal Package (19906 : PL20190001326 Iglesia 9.A.6.c Packet Pg. 1651 Attachment: ATTACHMENT B - Conditional Use - Full Submittal Package (19906 : PL20190001326 Iglesia Pentecostes Peniel CU) 9.A.6.c Packet Pg. 1652 Attachment: ATTACHMENT B - Conditional Use - Full Submittal Package (19906 : PL20190001326 Iglesia Pentecostes Peniel CU) 9.A.6.c Packet Pg. 1653 Attachment: ATTACHMENT B - Conditional Use - Full Submittal Package (19906 : PL20190001326 Iglesia Pentecostes Peniel CU) Environmental Data for CU Earth Tech Environmental, LLC www.eteflorida.com APPENDIX B Protected Species Survey 9.A.6.c Packet Pg. 1654 Attachment: ATTACHMENT B - Conditional Use - Full Submittal Package (19906 : PL20190001326 Iglesia Pentecostes Peniel CU) IMMOKALEE PENIEL CHURCH Protected Species Survey SECTIONS 27, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 27 EAST COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 34120 Prepared For: Prepared By: August 23, 2019 RDA Consulting Engineers c/o Richard Dubois 790 Harbour Drive, Suite 2C Naples, FL 34103 Earth Tech Environmental, LLC 10600 Jolea Avenue Bonita Springs, FL 34135 239.304.0030 www.eteflorida.com 9.A.6.c Packet Pg. 1655 Attachment: ATTACHMENT B - Conditional Use - Full Submittal Package (19906 : PL20190001326 Iglesia Pentecostes Peniel CU) Protected Species Survey Earth Tech Environmental, LLC www.eteflorida.com TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................................. 3 2.0 PROPERTY LOCATION ................................................................................................................... 3 3.0 SPECIES SURVEY MATERIALS & METHODS ................................................................................... 3 4.0 EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS .......................................................................................................... 4 5.0 RESULTS ...................................................................................................................................... 9 6.0 REFERENCES ................................................................................................................................ 15 EXHIBITS Figure 1 Site Location Map Figure 2 Aerial Map Figure 3 FLUCCS Map with Aerial Figure 4 FLUCCS Map Figure 5 Transect Map & Field Results Figure 6 Florida Bonneted Bat Consultation Area Figure 7 Wood Stork Information Figure 8 Florida Panther Information Figure 9 Black Bear Information 9.A.6.c Packet Pg. 1656 Attachment: ATTACHMENT B - Conditional Use - Full Submittal Package (19906 : PL20190001326 Iglesia Pentecostes Peniel CU) Protected Species Survey Earth Tech Environmental, LLC www.eteflorida.com 1.0 INTRODUCTION Earth Tech Environmental (ETE) conducted a search for listed species on the property referred to as the Immokalee Peniel Church parcel (Subject Property) prior to development. This assessment was conducted by ETE on July 24, 2019 to evaluate the Subject Property for the potential presence of listed species of concern based on the determined Florida Land Use Cover and Forms Classification System (FLUCCS) vegetation. 2.0 PROPERTY LOCATION The Subject Property for this report consists of two (2) adjacent parcels (Folio #’s 37750560106 & 37750560009). The Subject Property is located on the north side of 22nd Ave NE and just west of 8th St NE in Collier County. According to the Collier County Property Appraiser’s website, the Subject Property’s combined acreage is approximately 5.15 acres. See Figure 1 below for a location map. Figure 1. Site Location Map 3.0 SPECIES SURVEY MATERIALS & METHODS The species survey was conducted using a methodology similar to that discussed in the Florida Fish & Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC) publication “Ecology and Habitat Protection Needs of Gopher Tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus) Populations Found on Lands Slated for Large-scale Development in Florida.” This methodology is as follows: Existing vegetation communities or land-uses on the subject site are delineated on a recent aerial photograph (Collier County 2019) using the Florida Land Use, Cover and Forms Classification System (FLUCCS). FLUCCS mapping for this property is detailed below in (Figures 3 & 3 9.A.6.c Packet Pg. 1657 Attachment: ATTACHMENT B - Conditional Use - Full Submittal Package (19906 : PL20190001326 Iglesia Pentecostes Peniel CU) Protected Species Survey Earth Tech Environmental, LLC www.eteflorida.com 4). The resulting FLUCCS codes are cross-referenced with a list of protected plant and animal species. The lists were obtained from two agency publications: “Florida’s Endangered Species, Threatened Species & Species of Special Concern-Official Lists”, December 2018. “Notes on Florida’s Endangered and Threatened Plants”, Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, 2010. The result is a composite table that contains the names of the protected species which have the highest probability of occurring in each particular FLUCCS community. See Table 3 of this report for the species list that applies to the FLUCCS communities associated with the Subject Property. In the field, each FLUCCS community is searched for listed species or signs of listed species. This is accomplished using a series of transects throughout each vegetation community (see Figure 5). If necessary, transect integrity is maintained using a handheld GPS in track mode. Signs or sightings of all listed and non-listed species are then recorded, which are flagged in the field and marked by GPS. Based on the habitat types found on the Subject Property (see Table 3), particular attention was paid to the presence or absence of listed plant species such as wild pine, twisted air plants, and butterfly orchids. The presence and absence of listed animal species such as Big Cypress fox squirrel, gopher tortoise, Florida bonneted bat, wood stork, and Florida panther were also considered. Approximately four and a half (4.5) man-hours were logged on the Subject Property during this species survey (see Table 1). 4.0 EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS Temperatures during the fieldwork for this survey were in the low 90’s. Cloud cover was absent. The Subject Property is vacant and vegetated, consisting of upland and wetland communities. Moderate exotic vegetation is present throughout the property. The property is surrounded by roads and residential development on all sides. See Figure 2 below for an aerial map. The Subject Property has the following surrounding land uses: North Residential East 8th St NE/Residential South 22nd Ave NE/Vacant Residential West Residential TABLE 1. FIELD TIME SPENT ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY DATE START TIME END TIME NO. ECOLOGISTS MAN HOURS TASK July 24, 2019 1:00 pm 2:30 pm 3 4.5 Species Survey Fieldwork 4 9.A.6.c Packet Pg. 1658 Attachment: ATTACHMENT B - Conditional Use - Full Submittal Package (19906 : PL20190001326 Iglesia Pentecostes Peniel CU) Protected Species Survey Earth Tech Environmental, LLC www.eteflorida.com Figure 2. Aerial Map Listed below are the FLUCCS communities identified on the site. The community descriptions correspond to the mappings on the FLUCCS maps below (Figures 3 and 4). See Florida Land Use, Cover and Forms Classification System (Department of Transportation, Surveying & Mapping Geographic Mapping Section, 1999) for definitions. The Florida Exotic Pest Plant Council’s (FLEPPC) list of invasive species contains Category 1 species that may be found on the Subject Property. Category 1 species are invasive exotics that are altering native plant communities by displacing native species, changing community structures or ecological functions, or hybridizing with natives (FLEPPC). A significant factor in mapping vegetative associations and local habitats is the invasion of these species such as Brazilian pepper, ear leaf acacia, melaleuca, Caesar weed, and air potato. Levels of exotic density were mapped by using field observations and photo interpretation as shown in Figure 3. Modifiers, or “E” designators, are appended to the FLUCCS codes to indicate the approximate density of exotics in the canopy and/or sub-canopy. 5 9.A.6.c Packet Pg. 1659 Attachment: ATTACHMENT B - Conditional Use - Full Submittal Package (19906 : PL20190001326 Iglesia Pentecostes Peniel CU) Protected Species Survey Earth Tech Environmental, LLC www.eteflorida.com TABLE 2. ACREAGE PER FLUCCS COMMUNITY FLUCCS CODE DESCRIPTION ACREAGE 411-E1 Pine Flatwoods (<25% Exotics) 3.51 624- E2 Cypress – Pine – Cabbage Palm (26-50% Exotics) 0.81 814 Roadway 0.82 Site Total: 5.15 E1 = Exotics <25% of total cover E2 = Exotics 26-50% of total cover E3 = Exotics 51-75% of total cover E4 = Exotics >75% of total cover Figure 3. FLUCCS Map with Aerial 6 9.A.6.c Packet Pg. 1660 Attachment: ATTACHMENT B - Conditional Use - Full Submittal Package (19906 : PL20190001326 Iglesia Pentecostes Peniel CU) Protected Species Survey Earth Tech Environmental, LLC www.eteflorida.com Figure 4. FLUCCS Map FLUCCS 411-E1, Pine Flatwoods (<25% Exotics) This community dominates the majority of the property. Canopy vegetation consists mostly of slash pine (Pinus elliottii) and scattered cabbage palm (Sabal palmetto). The mid-story is sparse, largely containing saw palmetto with lesser amounts of gallberry (Ilex glabra), rusty staggerbush (Lyonia fruticosa), and winged sumac (Rhus copallinum). The groundcover is largely covered by a dense blanket of grapevine (Vitis rotundifolia), lovevine (Cassytha filiformis), and a thick layer of pine needles. Exotic coverage is relatively low with the ecotone displaying higher abundances of Brazilian pepper (Schinus terebinthifolia). FLUCCS 624-E2, Cypress – Pine – Cabbage Palm (26-50% Exotics) This community is found on the southeast portion of the property. It is dominated by large cypress (Taxodium distichum), cabbage palm, and sparse slash pine, in the canopy. The mid-story is dominated by dense Brazilian pepper with lesser amounts of myrsine (Myrsine cubana) and cabbage palm. Groundcover contains minimal diversity and consists primarily of swamp fern (Telmatoblechnum serrulatum). Exotic coverage is moderate consisting primarily of dense Brazilian pepper. FLUCCS 814, Roadways This community along the eastern and southern portions of the property and include 8th St NE and 22nd Ave NE along with their associated right-of-way’s. The various protected species which may occur in the corresponding FLUCCS communities are shown below in Table 3. 7 9.A.6.c Packet Pg. 1661 Attachment: ATTACHMENT B - Conditional Use - Full Submittal Package (19906 : PL20190001326 Iglesia Pentecostes Peniel CU) Protected Species Survey Earth Tech Environmental, LLC www.eteflorida.com TABLE 3. PROTECTED SPECIES LIST ACCORDING TO FLUCCS CATEGORY FLUCCS POTENTIAL LISTED SPECIES SCIENTIFIC NAME DESIGNATED STATUS FWC OR FDACS FWS 411 Beautiful Pawpaw Deeringothamnus rugelii var. pulchellus E E Big Cypress Fox Squirrel Sciurus niger avicennia T - Eastern Indigo Snake Drymarchon corais couperi T T Fakahatchee Burmannia Burmannia flava E - Florida Coontie Zamia integrifolia CE - Florida Panther Felis concolor coryi E E Gopher Tortoise Gopherus polyphemus T - Red-Cockaded Woodpecker Picoides borealis E E Satinleaf Chrysophyllum oliviforme T - Southeastern American Kestrel Falco sparverius paulus T - Twisted Air Plant Tillandsia flexuosa T - 624 American Alligator Alligator mississippiensis SSC T(S/A) Butterfly Orchid Encyclia tampensis CE - Common Wild Pine Tillandsia fasciculata E - Everglades Mink Mustela vison evergladensis T - Florida Panther Felis concolor coryi E E Little Blue Heron Egretta caerulea T - Tricolored Heron Egretta tricolor T - Wood Stork Mycteria americana T T 814 NONE - - - Abbreviations Agencies: Status: FDACS = Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services CE = Commercially Exploited FWC = Florida Fish & Wildlife Conservation Commission E = Endangered FWS = United States Fish and Wildlife Service SSC = Species of Special Concern T = Threatened T(S/A) = Threatened/Similarity of Appearance 8 9.A.6.c Packet Pg. 1662 Attachment: ATTACHMENT B - Conditional Use - Full Submittal Package (19906 : PL20190001326 Iglesia Pentecostes Peniel CU) Protected Species Survey Earth Tech Environmental, LLC www.eteflorida.com 5.0 RESULTS All relevant species observed on the Subject Property are detailed in Table 4 and any protected species observed are specifically noted. See Figure 5 below for transect and field results. Figure 5. Transect Map & Field Results 9 9.A.6.c Packet Pg. 1663 Attachment: ATTACHMENT B - Conditional Use - Full Submittal Package (19906 : PL20190001326 Iglesia Pentecostes Peniel CU) Protected Species Survey Earth Tech Environmental, LLC www.eteflorida.com TABLE 4. SPECIES OBSERVED ON THE SUBJECT PROPERTY COMMON NAME SCIENTIFIC NAME OBSERVATIONS LISTED SPECIES? STATUS Birds Blue Jay Cyanocitta cristata DV N - Red-Bellied Woodpecker Melanerpes carolinus DV N - Mammals NONE - - - - Reptiles NONE - - - - Amphibians NONE - - - - Plants Butterfly Orchid Encyclia tampensis DV N CE Common Wild Pine* Tillandsia fasciculata DV Y SE * = protected species Abbreviations Observations:Observations: Status: C = Cavity N = Nest CE = Commercially Exploited DB = Day Bed OH = Observed Hole/Burrow FE = Federally Endangered DV = Direct Visual OT = Observed Tracks FT = Federally Threatened HV = Heard Vocalization(s)R = Remains SE = State Endangered MT = Marked Tree S = Scat SSC = Species of Special Concern ST = State Threatened Below are discussions of each listed species observed on the Subject Property: Listed Plants Common wild pine (Tillandsia fasciculata) and butterfly orchids (Encyclia tampensis) were observed on the Subject Property. Typically, individual plants are relocated from proposed impact areas into onsite (or offsite) preserves prior to construction. One nest was observed approximately 25 feet high in a living cypress tree in the wetland area near the southern property boundary. No species were observed utilizing the nest and it is inconclusive the species that built it. The groundcover below the nest is heavily invaded with Brazilian pepper. The site does have community types in which protected species could reside. During permitting, the following listed species concerns may be raised by the agencies: 10 9.A.6.c Packet Pg. 1664 Attachment: ATTACHMENT B - Conditional Use - Full Submittal Package (19906 : PL20190001326 Iglesia Pentecostes Peniel CU) Protected Species Survey Earth Tech Environmental, LLC www.eteflorida.com Figure 6. Florida Bonneted Bat Consultation Area Florida Bonneted Bat (Eumops floridana) The Subject Property falls within the Florida Bonneted Bat (FBB) Consultation Area and FBB Focal Area (see Figure 6 above). During the species survey, no potential bat cavities were observed. The 5.15-acre property is surrounded by development on all sides. Prior to any development or permitting activities, the US Fish & Wildlife Service (USFWS) may require acoustic surveys to further determine presence or absence of FBB roosts or foraging on the property. 11 9.A.6.c Packet Pg. 1665 Attachment: ATTACHMENT B - Conditional Use - Full Submittal Package (19906 : PL20190001326 Iglesia Pentecostes Peniel CU) Protected Species Survey Earth Tech Environmental, LLC www.eteflorida.com Figure 7. Wood Stork Information Wood Stork (Mycteria americana) The Subject Property falls within the core foraging area (estimated at 18.6 miles) of at least two (2) wood stork colonies in Collier County. See Figure 7 above for wood stork colony and foraging information as it relates to the property. The dense/overgrown nature of the wetland habitat on the property likely precludes wood stork foraging. Consultation with USFWS will likely not be necessary for wood stork and wood stork foraging. 12 9.A.6.c Packet Pg. 1666 Attachment: ATTACHMENT B - Conditional Use - Full Submittal Package (19906 : PL20190001326 Iglesia Pentecostes Peniel CU) Protected Species Survey Earth Tech Environmental, LLC www.eteflorida.com Figure 8. Florida Panther Information Florida Panther (Felis concolor coryi) The property does fall within the USFWS Florida panther habitat zones and consultation areas. See Figure 8 for Florida panther information as it relates to the Subject Property. Consultation with the USFWS will likely be necessary for Florida panther. 13 9.A.6.c Packet Pg. 1667 Attachment: ATTACHMENT B - Conditional Use - Full Submittal Package (19906 : PL20190001326 Iglesia Pentecostes Peniel CU) Protected Species Survey Earth Tech Environmental, LLC www.eteflorida.com Figure 9. Black Bear Information Florida Black Bear (Ursus americanus floridanus) The property falls within the FWC mapped range for Florida black Bear. Telemetry points from tagged bears have been documented on and in the vicinity of the Subject Property. See Figure 9 for black bear mappings as they relate to the Subject Property. The County may require the Client to implement FWC- approved bear-proof waste receptacles on the property. 14 9.A.6.c Packet Pg. 1668 Attachment: ATTACHMENT B - Conditional Use - Full Submittal Package (19906 : PL20190001326 Iglesia Pentecostes Peniel CU) Protected Species Survey Earth Tech Environmental, LLC www.eteflorida.com 6.0 REFERENCES Ashton, Ray E. and Patricia S. “The Natural History and Management for the Gopher Tortoise.” Krieger Publishing Company. Malabar, Florida. 2008. Collier County Property Appraiser. http://www.collierappraiser.com Cox, James; Inkley, Douglas; and Kautz, Randy. “Ecology and Habitat Protection Needs of Gopher Tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus) Populations Found on Lands Slated for Large-Scale Development in Florida.” Nongame Wildlife Program Technical Report No. 4. December 1987. http://www.fwspubs.org/doi/suppl/10.3996/062015-JFWM-055/suppl_file/062015-jfwm- 055.s2.pdf?code=ufws-site “Florida’s Endangered and Threatened Species”- Official List. Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission. Updated December 2018. https://myfwc.com/media/1945/threatend-endangered-species.pdf http://myfwc.com/imperiledspecies/ Florida Land Use, Cover and Forms Classification (FLUCCS) Handbook. Florida Department of Transportation. January 1999. http://www.fdot.gov/geospatial/documentsandpubs/fluccmanual1999.pdf http://www.fdot.gov/geospatial/doc_pubs.shtm Weaver, Richard E. and Anderson, Patti J. “Notes on Florida’s Endangered and Threatened Plants.” Bureau of Entomology, Nematology and Plant Pathology – Botany Section. Contribution No. 38, 5th Edition. 2010. http://freshfromflorida.s3.amazonaws.com/fl-endangered-plants.pdf http://www.freshfromflorida.com/Divisions-Offices/Plant-Industry/Bureaus-and-Services/Bureau-of- Entomology-Nematology-Plant-Pathology/Botany/Florida-s-Endangered-Plants 15 9.A.6.c Packet Pg. 1669 Attachment: ATTACHMENT B - Conditional Use - Full Submittal Package (19906 : PL20190001326 Iglesia Pentecostes Peniel CU) Environmental Data for CU Earth Tech Environmental, LLC www.eteflorida.com APPENDIX C Earth Tech Environmental Staff Qualifications 9.A.6.c Packet Pg. 1670 Attachment: ATTACHMENT B - Conditional Use - Full Submittal Package (19906 : PL20190001326 Iglesia Pentecostes Peniel CU) 239.304.0030 | www.eteflorida.com Ms. Bobka joined Earth Tech Environmental, LLC (ETE) in 2016 as an Ecologist with more than 8 years of private and public sector experience in the environmental field. As an Ecologist, Jennifer fulfills duties in environmental consulting, wetland & wildlife monitoring, species surveys, GIS mapping, Phase I Environmental Site Assessments (ESAs), and ERP permitting. Relevant Experience Jennifer has worked as a Naturalist for a non-profit in Collier County, a Manatee Research Intern with Florida Fish & Wildlife Conservation Commission in Palm Beach, and a Field Crew Leader for Montana Conservation Corps. Her varied experience spans coastal marine, shoreline and estuarine habitats, to upland forests and alpine environments. She has worked with a wide variety of native and invasive plant and wildlife species, with a special interest in threatened and endangered species. She is also an experienced environmental educator and Certified Interpretive Guide. Jennifer’s work experience includes: Vegetation and Habitat Mapping Wetland Determinations Bald Eagle Monitoring Monitoring Well Installation Shorebird Surveys GIS Mapping Protected Species Surveys Phase I ESAs Species Management Plans Environmental Resource Permitting (ERP) Submerged Resource Surveys Natural Resource Management Turbidity Monitoring Trail Maintenance Seagrass Surveys Mechanical and Manual Forest Fuel Reduction Preserve Monitoring Small Watercraft Operations Invasive and Exotic Species Mapping Ecological Restoration Wildfire Assessments Environmental Education & Outreach Relevant Certifications/Credentials Florida Master Naturalist, UF/IFAS, 2019 Nitrox Certified Diver, SCUBAdventures, 2018 Certified Interpretive Guide, National Association of Interpretation, 2016 PADI Open Water SCUBA Diver, SCUBA Outfitters of Naples, 2012 Wilderness First Responder, SOLO Schools, 2009 JENNIFER BOBKA Consulting Manager/Ecologist e: jenniferb@eteflorida.com t: 239.304.0030 m: 406.579.4616 Years’ Experience 8 years Education/Training B.A. Environmental Studies Montana State University (2009) Marine Biology & Coastal Ecology Study Abroad, Costa Rica (2007) Python Responder The Nature Conservancy (2015) Sawyer Training US Forest Service (2010) Professional Affiliations Florida Native Plant Society (FNPS) Florida Association of Environmental Professionals (FAEP) League of Environmental Educators of Florida (LEEF) 9.A.6.c Packet Pg. 1671 Attachment: ATTACHMENT B - Conditional Use - Full Submittal Package (19906 : PL20190001326 Iglesia Pentecostes Peniel CU) Page 1 of 1 800 Harbour Drive, Suite 2C, Naples, FL 34103 • (O) 239-649-1551 • (F) 239-649-7112 info@rdafl.com • www.rdafl.com Iglesia Pentecostes Peniel Church (PL20190001326) Statement of Utility Provisions Potable Water: The property will be serviced by a private onsite potable water well. Fire suppression will also be provided via an onsite private well. Sanitary Sewer: The subject property will be serviced by a private onsite sanitary sewer septic tank and field. 9.A.6.c Packet Pg. 1672 Attachment: ATTACHMENT B - Conditional Use - Full Submittal Package (19906 : PL20190001326 Iglesia Pentecostes Peniel CU) 1 inch = 100' ft. GRAPHIC SCALE 9.A.6.c Packet Pg. 1673 Attachment: ATTACHMENT B - Conditional Use - Full Submittal Package (19906 : PL20190001326 Iglesia Pentecostes Peniel CU) 1 inch = 100' ft. GRAPHIC SCALE 9.A.6.c Packet Pg. 1674 Attachment: ATTACHMENT B - Conditional Use - Full Submittal Package (19906 : PL20190001326 Iglesia Pentecostes Peniel CU) PROPOSED PRESERVE AREA AREA = 28,897 SF AREA = 0.66 AC PROPOSED CHURCH 22ND AVENUE NE (COUNTY ROW)8TH STREET NE(COUNTY ROW)WATER MANAGEMENT WATER MANAGEMENT75' WIDE NATIVE BUFFER (TYPE "B" SCREENING)10' TYPE "D" LANDSCAPE BUFFER75' WIDE NATIVE BUFFER(TYPE "B" SCREENING)10' TYPE "D" LANDSCAPE BUFFER PROPERTY BOUNDARY EXISTING 50' ROADWAY EASEMENT PRESERVE BOUNDARY EX. PROPERTY LINE PRESERVE BOUNDARY EDGE OF EX. ASPHALT PROPOSED SEPTIC FIELD LOCATION PROPOSED POTABLE WELL LOCATION EDGE OF PRESERVE SETBACK EXISTING 30' ROADWAY EASEMENT PROPOSED SIDEWALK CONNECTION PROPOSED DUMPSTER AND RECYCLING AREA GRASS PARKING AREA GRASS PARKING AREA WATER MANAGEMENTWATER MANAGEMENT 117' 25' PRESERVE SETBACK EDGE OF PRESERVE SETBACK 00 100'50' SCALE: 1" = 100' N IGLESIA PENTECOSTES PENIEL - GOLDEN GATE CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN RDA CONSULTING ENGINEERS 800 HARBOUR DRIVE, SUITE 210 NAPLES, FLORIDA 34103 PHONE: (239) 649-1551 FAX: (239) 649-7112 WWW.RDAFL.COM PROJECT #:RDA19084 PAGE:1 OF 2 DATE:08/24/2021 9.A.6.c Packet Pg. 1675 Attachment: ATTACHMENT B - Conditional Use - Full Submittal Package (19906 : PL20190001326 Iglesia IGLESIA PENTECOSTES PENIEL - GOLDEN GATE CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN RDA CONSULTING ENGINEERS 800 HARBOUR DRIVE, SUITE 210 NAPLES, FLORIDA 34103 PHONE: (239) 649-1551 FAX: (239) 649-7112 WWW.RDAFL.COM PROJECT #:RDA19084 PAGE:2 OF 2 DATE:08/24/2021 PARKING SUMMARY BUILDING USE # OF SEATS MINIMUM REQUIRED SPACES SPACES REQUIRED SPACES PROVIDED CHURCH 100 SEATS IN THE CHAPEL AREA 3 SPACES FOR EACH 7 SEATS IN THE CHAPEL AREA 42.9 = 43 45 (2 HC SPACES) NOTE PARKING SPACE REQUIREMENT PER SECTION 4.05.04.g. TABLE 17 OF THE COLLIER COUNTY LDC. HANDICAP SPACES HAVE BEEN PROVIDED BASED ON COLLIER COUNTY LDC SECTION 4.05.07 TABLE 19. GENERAL NOTES: 1.VEGETATION WITHIN THE PRESERVE WILL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF COLLIER COUNTY LDC SECTION 3.05.07. 2.A SIDEWALK ALONG 22ND AVENUE NE WILL BE PROVIDED AND WILL CONNECT TO THE EXISTING SIDEWALK ALONG 8TH STREET NE. 3.THESE PLANS ARE FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMITTING AND ARE NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION USE. 4.PER SECTION 4.05.02.B.1.A.III. OF THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, “UP TO 70 PERCENT OF THE PARKING SPACES FOR HOUSES OF WORSHIP AND SCHOOLS MAY BE SURFACED WITH GRASS OR LAWN, WHEN THE COUNTY MANAGER OR DESIGNEE DETERMINES THAT THE PAVING OF SOME OR ALL PARKING SPACES FOR HOUSES OF WORSHIP AND SCHOOLS WILL HAVE SIGNIFICANT NEGATIVE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS.”. THIS PROJECT WILL BE PROVIDING GRASS PARKING FOR A MINIMUM OF 25% OF THE PROPOSED PARKING SPACES. PRESERVE AREA CALCULATION TOTAL SITE AREA 224,270 SF = 5.15 AC NATIVE VEGETATION 4.32 AC PRESERVE REQUIREMENT 15% REQUIRED PRESERVE 28,314 SF = 0.65 AC PROVIDED PRESERVE 28,897 SF = 0.66 AC ADJACENT ZONING AND LAND USE ZONING LAND USE N ESTATE, E RESIDENTIAL S ROW, THEN ESTATE, E RESIDENTIAL E ROW, THEN ESTATE, E RESIDENTIAL W ESTATE, E RESIDENTIAL PLANNING NOTES CURRENT ZONING E PROPOSED ZONING E / CONDITIONAL USE CURRENT LAND USE UNDEVELOPED FUTURE LAND USE ESTATES DESIGNATION PROPOSED LAND USE CHURCH NUMBER OF SEATS 100 SEATS MAXIMUM CHURCH SQUARE FOOTAGE 5,000 SF MAXIMUM ZONED BUILDING HEIGHT 30 FT MAXIMUM ACTUAL BUILDING HEIGHT 30 FT UTILITY NOTE: POTABLE WATER WILL BE PROVIDED VIA A PRIVATE GROUND WATER WELL AND SANITARY SEWER TREATMENT WILL BE PROVIDED VIA A PRIVATE SEPTIC TANK AND DRAIN FIELD. LOCATIONS OF POTABLE WATER WELL AND SEPTIC TANK WILL BE DETERMINED UPON FINAL SITE DEVELOPMENT PLANNING AND ARE THEREFORE NOT SHOWN ON THIS CONCEPTUAL MASTER PLAN. REQUIRED SETBACKS SUMMARY REQUIRED BUILDING FRONT - CORNER STREET SETBACK 37.5' FRONT - CORNER STREET SETBACK 37.5' SIDE SETBACK 30' REAR SETBACK 75' PRESERVE PRINCIPAL SETBACK 25' ACCESSORY SETBACK 10' LAND USE SUMMARY ACRES % OF SITE WATER MANAGEMENT +/- 0.25 4.8% PERIMETER BUFFERS +/- 1.55 30.1% PAVEMENT / SIDEWALK +/- 0.50 9.7% BUILDING FOOTPRINT AREA +/- 0.12 2.3% PRESERVE AREA +/- 0.66 12.8% MISC. OPEN SPACE +/- 2.07 40.3% TOTAL SITE AREA +/- 5.15 100% 9.A.6.c Packet Pg. 1676 Attachment: ATTACHMENT B - Conditional Use - Full Submittal Package (19906 : PL20190001326 Iglesia Page 1 of 1 800 Harbour Drive, Suite 210, Naples, FL 34103 • (O) 239-649-1551 • (F) 239-649-7112 info@rdafl.com • www.rdafl.com Conditions of Approval 1. Hours of Operation: The hours of operation for the church will be Wednesday and Sunday for a maximum of 6 hours per day. 2. Days of Operation: The days of normal church operation will be Wednesday and Sunday. 3. Number of Seats (where applicable): The proposed church building will have 100 seats. 4. Total number of members or users: The total number of church members has been estimated to be between 60 and 80 members. 5. Total number of groups using the site (different congregations, organizations, or clubs): The church building will not be used for any other type of group, organization, or club. 6. Location, square footage, and proposed use for each structure: There is only one structure being proposed with this church project. The proposed church building will be a maximum of 5,000 square feet. 7. Number of meetings, (i.e. Bible Study/Worship/Business Meetings) and days and times: All church services and meetings will be held on Wednesdays and Sundays for a maximum of 6 hours. The church plans on having one (1) special event quarterly outside of regular church services. 8. Identify all principal and accessory uses to occur on site: Worship services within the main church building will be the only use to occur on site. 9. Any planned special events (fundraisers, holidays): The church plans on having one (1) special event quarterly outside of regular church services. Special event permitting is required for all special events. 10. Complete Trip Generation information: The maximum total daily trip generation shall not exceed +/- 8 two-way PM peak hour net trips based on the use codes in the ITE Manual on trip generation rates in effect at the time of application for SDP/SDPA or subdivision plat approval. 11. Additional Traffic Condition: For services and other periods and events of significant traffic generation, as determined by Collier County staff, the property owner shall provide traffic control by law enforcement or a law enforcement approved service provider as directed by Collier County staff, with staffing an at location(s) as directed by the Collier County Transportation Administrator or his designee. 9.A.6.c Packet Pg. 1677 Attachment: ATTACHMENT B - Conditional Use - Full Submittal Package (19906 : PL20190001326 Iglesia Pentecostes Peniel CU) Page 1 of 1 800 Harbour Drive, Suite 2C, Naples, FL 34103 • (O) 239-649-1551 • (F) 239-649-7112 info@rdafl.com • www.rdafl.com Exhibit A – Legal Description Folio Number: 37750560009 Legal Description: THE EAST 350’ OF TRACT 133, GOLDEN GATE ESTATES, UNIT NO. 23, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 7, PAGES 9 AND 10, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. Folio Number: 37750560106 Legal Description: TRACT 133, LESS THE EAST 350’ THEREOF, GOLDEN GATE ESTATES, UNIT NO 23, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 7, PAGES 9 AND 10, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. 9.A.6.c Packet Pg. 1678 Attachment: ATTACHMENT B - Conditional Use - Full Submittal Package (19906 : PL20190001326 Iglesia Pentecostes Peniel CU) FUTURE HOUSE WORSHIP FOR IGLESIA PENTECOSTES ALBA DE PENIEL AT 22 AVE NE, NAPLES FL 34120 9.A.6.c Packet Pg. 1679 Attachment: ATTACHMENT B - Conditional Use - Full Submittal Package (19906 : PL20190001326 Iglesia COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliercountyfl.gov (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Hybrid Virtual Quasi-Judicial Public Hearing Waiver Emergency/Executive Order 2020-04 Hearing of the Collier County Planning Commission and Board of County Commissioners For Petition Number(s): _________________________________________________________________ Regarding the above subject petition number(s), ________________________________ (Name of Applicant) elects to proceed during the declared emergency with hybrid virtual public hearings of the Collier County Planning Commission and Board of County Commissioners, and waives the right to contest any procedural irregularity due to the hybrid virtual nature of the public hearing. Name: _________________________________ Date: ___________________________ Signature*: ______________________________฀ Applicant฀Legal Counsel to Applicant * This form must be signed by either the Applicant (if the applicant is a corporate entity, this must be an officer of the corporate entity) or the legal counsel to the Applicant. ✔ Iglesia Pentecostes Peniel, Inc Diogenes Marquina, President 8/31/2021 PL20190001326 & PL20190001333 9.A.6.d Packet Pg. 1680 Attachment: CCPC-BCC Hybrid Meeting Waiver (1) (19906 : PL20190001326 Iglesia Pentecostes Peniel CU)