The URL can be used to link to this page

Agenda 09/28/2021 Item #9A (Ordinance - Blue Coral Apartments)09/28/2021 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This item requires that ex parte disclosure be provided by Commission members. Should a hearing be held on this item, all participants are required to be sworn in. Recommendation to approve an Ordinance of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida amending Ordinance Number 2004-41, as amended, the Collier County Land Development Code, which established the comprehensive zoning regulations for the unincorporated area of Collier County, Florida, by amending the appropriate zoning atlas map or maps by changing the zoning classification of the herein described real property from an Agricultural (A) zoning district to a Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) zoning district for the project to be known as Blue Coral Apartments RPUD, to allow development of up to 234 multi -family rental units, of which 70 will be rent restricted as affordable. The subject property is located on the south side of Immokalee Road, approximately 1000 feet west of Juliet Boulevard, in Section 30, Township 48 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, consisting of 9.354: acres; and by providing an effective date. [PL20190001600] (This is a companion to Item PL20190001620 Agenda Item 9B) OBJECTIVE: To have the Board of County Commissioners (Board) review staff s findings and recommendations along with the recommendations of the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) regarding the above -referenced petition, render a decision regarding this rezoning petition and ensure the project is in harmony with all the applicable codes and regulations in order to ensure that the community's interests are maintained. CONSIDERATIONS: The subject property is located at the on the south side of Immokalee Road approximately 1000 feet west of Juliet Boulevard in Section 30, Township 48 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, consisting of 9.35+/- acres. The applicant is requesting that the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) consider an application to rezone a property from Rural Agricultural (A) zoning district to a Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) zoning district for the project to be known as Blue Coral Apartments RPUD. The subject property is comprised of one parcel and is owned by William C Scherer Trust c/o Excel Real Estate. This petition seeks to rezone the property to RPUD to allow for the development of up to 234 multifamily rental units and related accessory uses. The development will include 70 rent restricted units for essential service personnel. FISCAL IMPACT: The PUD Rezone (PUDZ) by and of itself will have no fiscal impact on Collier County. There is no guarantee that the project, at build -out, will maximize its authorized level of development. However, if the PUD Rezone is approved, a portion of the land could be developed, and the new development will result in an impact on Collier County public facilities. The County collects impact fees prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy to help offset the impacts of each new development on public facilities. These impact fees are used to fund projects identified in the Capital Improvement Element of the Growth Management Plan (GMP) as needed to maintain the adopted Level of Service (LOS) for public facilities. Additionally, in order to meet the requirements of concurrency management, the developer of every local development order approved by Collier County is required to pay a portion of the estimated Transportation Impact Fees associated with the project in accordance with Chapter 74 of the Collier County Code of Laws and Ordinances. Other fees collected prior to issuance of a building permit include building permit review fees. Please note that impact fees and taxes collected were not included in the criteria used by staff and the Planning Commission to analyze this petition. GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN (GMP) IMPACT: The proposed PUD is inconsistent with the Packet Pg. 18 09/28/2021 GMP unless the Board approves the companion GMPA first or concurrent with the PUD and the uses and intensities align. Transportation Element: In evaluating this project, staff reviewed the applicant's May 29, 2020 Traffic Impact Statement for consistency with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the Growth Management Plan (GMP) using the then applicable 2019 Annual Update and Inventory Reports (AUIR). Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the GMP states: "The County Commission shall review all rezone petitions, SRA designation applications, conditional use petitions, and proposed amendments to the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) affecting the overall countywide density or intensity of permissible development, with consideration of their impact on the overall County transportation system, and shall not approve any petition or application that would directly access a deficient roadway segment as identified in the current AUIR or if it impacts an adjacent roadway segment that is deficient as identified in the current AUIR, or which significantly impacts a roadway segment or adjacent roadway segment that is currently operating and/or is projected to operate below an adopted Level of Service Standard within the five year AUIR planning period, unless specific mitigating stipulations are also approved. A petition or application has significant impacts if the traffic impact statement reveals that any of the following occur: a. For links (roadway segments) directly accessed by the project where project traffic is equal to or exceeds 2% of the adopted LOS standard service volume; b. For links adjacent to links directly accessed by the project where project traffic is equal to or exceeds 2% of the adopted LOS standard service volume; and c. For all other links the project traffic is considered to be significant up to the point where it is equal to or exceeds 3% of the adopted LOS standard service volume. Mitigating stipulations shall be based upon a mitigation plan prepared by the applicant and submitted as part of the traffic impact statement that addresses the project's significant impacts on all roadways. " Staff finding: According to the TIS provided with this petition the proposed 280 multi -family residential development will generate a projected total of+/- 119 PM peak hour, 2-way trips on the adjacent roadway segments of Immokalee Road. The trips generated by this development will occur on the following adjacent roadway network links using the current 2020 AUIR: Roadway/Link # Link 2020 Current Peak Hour Projected 2020 AUIR Peak Direction P.M Peak Remaining LOS Volume/Peak Hour/Peak Capacity Direction Direction Proj ect Traffic (1) Immokalee Road/42.1 Airport Pulling D 3,100/East 12WB 729 Rd. to Livingston Rd. Immokalee Road/42.2 Livingston Rd. to D 3,500/East 44/EB 450 (2) I-75 Expected Trip Bank Deficient 2028 Immokalee Road/43.1 I-75 to Logan D 3,500/East 5/EB 390 (2) Blvd. Expected Trip Bank Deficient Packet Pg. 19 09/28/2021 2025 Livingston Road/51.0 Imperial St. to B 3,000/North 7/NB 1,504 Immokalee Rd. Livingston Road/52.0 South of C 3,100/North 15/NB 858 Immokalee Rd. 1. Source for P.M. Peak Hour/Peak Direction Project Traffic is May 29, 2020; Traffic Impact Statement provided by the petitioner. 2. Projected deficiencies for segments 42.2 and 43.1 are both due to projected background traffic from trip bank not caused by this development. Staff notes this section of Immokalee Road is within a current study area that includes intersection improvements that will improve capacity on the noted projected trip bank deficiencies. This study will be presented to the Board of County Commissioners later this year for consideration. This project is also within the Northwest Transportation Concurrently Management Area (TCMA) which currently operates with 97.1% lane miles meeting standards. Applicable Florida Statute 163.3180 bullet points: ■ Facilities determined to be deficient with existing, committed, and vested trips plus projected background traffic from any source other than the development shall be removed from the proportionate share calculation. ■ The improvement necessary to correct this type of deficiency is the funding responsibility of the maintaining entity. ■ Applicant must receive a credit for the anticipated road impact fees. ■ Applicant will pay the required Collier County road impact fees as building permits are issued for the project. Based on the TIS provided by the applicant, the 2020 AUIR, and Florida State Statute 169.3180 the subject PUD can be found consistent with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the Growth Management Plan. The staff findings, above, provided in the CCPC staff report remain in place. Staff notes since the CCPC the proposed number of multi -family residential units has been reduced from 280 units to 234 units in this petition. Appropriately, this reduction in multi -family residential units will generate a lower trip generation projected total of +/- 100 PM peak hour, 2-way trips on the adjacent roadway segments of Immokalee Road. Transportation Planning staff finds this petition consistent with the GMP. Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME): Environmental review staff has found this project to be consistent with the Conservation & Coastal Management Element (COME). The project site consists of 7.98 acres of native vegetation. A minimum of 1.18 (15%) acres of native vegetation shall be placed under preservation and dedicated to Collier County. COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION (CCPQ RECOMMENDATION: The CCPC heard petition PUDZ-PL201210001600 and companion petition GMPA-PL20190001620 on May 20, 2021. One (1) registered speaker (online), inquired about Collier County Public School impacts, buffer requirements, monitoring of affordable housing units, and site "net" acreage for actual development, but did not voice objection to, or support for, the petition. No opposition was voiced at the CCPC hearing; however, staff received two (2) letters of opposition prior to the CCPC hearing - one (1) letter from a resident/owner within the Bermuda Palms development to the west, opposing the amendment due to ingress/egress, traffic, public utilities, project layout, and density concerns; and, the other opposition letter Packet Pg. 20 09/28/2021 with twenty-six (26) petitions from the Bermuda Palms Association President and residents objecting to ingress/egress to/from Bermuda Palms and the project density at 30 dwelling units per acre. [Note: The original request was for 30 DU/A (280 DUs) but was revised to 25 DU/A (234 DUs) at the CCPC hearing.] The CCPC by a vote of 5 to 0 recommended to forward this petition to the Board with a recommendation of approval with required changes to the PUD as explained below, which have been incorporated into the PUD Document: 1. Reduction to density from 30 DU/A to 25 DU/A. 2. Increase to the number of affordable housing units to 70 units. 3. Revision of the notice requirement for advertising the affordable housing units from 30 days to 45 days. 4. Reduction of the zoned and actual building height from 55 feet and 60 feet respectively to 50 feet. 5. For the applicant to work with county staff to provide an enhanced Type B buffer on the project's western property line. 6. A correction to the Masterplan "Exhibit C" to adequately identify the 25-foot principal building setback provided in the RPUD Development Standards. A portion of the transcript of the CCPC minutes from the May 20, 2021 meeting is included as an attachment. LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: This is a site -specific rezone from the Agricultural (A) zoning district to a Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) zoning district for the project to be known as Blue Coral Apartments RPUD. The burden falls upon the applicant to prove that the proposed rezone is consistent with all the criteria set forth below. The burden then shifts to the Board of County Commissioners, should it consider denying the rezone to determine that such denial would not be arbitrary, discriminatory, or unreasonable. This would be accomplished by finding that the proposal does not meet one or more of the listed criteria below. Criteria for RPUD Rezones Ask yourself the following questions. The answers assist you in making a determination for approval or not. 1. Consider: The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer, water, and other utilities. 2. Is there an adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of agreements, contract, or other instruments or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense? Findings and recommendations of this type shall be made only after consultation with the County Attorney. 3. Consider: Conformity of the proposed RPUD with the goals, objectives and policies of the Growth Management Plan. 4. Consider: The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening requirements. Is there an adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the Packet Pg. 21 09/28/2021 development? 6. Consider: The timing or sequence of development (as proposed) for the purpose of assuring the adequacy of available improvements and facilities, both public and private. 7. Consider: The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion. 8. Consider: Conformity with RPUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the particular case, based on determination that such modifications are justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations. 9. Will the proposed change be consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies and future land use map and the elements of the Growth Management Plan? 10. Will the proposed RPUD Rezone be appropriate considering the existing land use pattern? 11. Would the requested RPUD Rezone result in the possible creation of an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts? 12. Consider: Whether existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the property proposed for change. 13. Consider: Whether changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed amendment necessary. 14. Will the proposed change adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood? 15. Will the proposed change create or excessively increase traffic congestion or create types of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses, because of peak volumes or projected types of vehicular traffic, including activity during construction phases of the development, or otherwise affect public safety? 16. Will the proposed change create a drainage problem? 17. Will the proposed change seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas? 18. Will the proposed change adversely affect property values in the adjacent area? 19. Will the proposed change be a deterrent to the improvement or development of adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations? 20. Consider: Whether the proposed change will constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual owner as contrasted with the public welfare. 21. Are there substantial reasons why the property cannot ("reasonably") be used in accordance with existing zoning? (a "core" question...) 22. Is the change suggested out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the County? 23. Consider: Whether it is impossible to find other adequate sites in the County for the proposed use in districts already permitting such use. 24. Consider: The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site alteration which Packet Pg. 22 09/28/2021 would be required to make the property usable for any of the range of potential uses under the proposed zoning classification. 25. Consider: The impact of development resulting from the proposed RPUD rezone on the availability of adequate public facilities and services consistent with the levels of service adopted in the Collier County Growth Management Plan and as defined and implemented through the Collier County Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance [Code ch.106, art.II], as amended. 26. Are there other factors, standards, or criteria relating to the RPUD rezone request that the Board of County Commissioners shall deem important in the protection of the public health, safety, and welfare? The Board must base its decision upon the competent, substantial evidence presented by the written materials supplied to it, including but not limited to the Staff Report, Executive Summary, maps, studies, letters from interested persons, and the oral testimony presented at the Board hearing as these items relate to these criteria. The proposed Ordinance was prepared by the County Attorney's Office. This item has been reviewed as to form and legality, and an affirmative vote of four is necessary for Board approval. CRK41130V lu 104017.11Y to]e To approve the attached Ordinance, consistent with the CCPC recommendation, and including developer commitment text language changes incorporated after the CCPC's review to allow for interconnections to be optional for adjacent property owners and to clarify that the affordable housing commitment for income and rent restricted units shall remain in place after the 45-day advertisement for ESP occupancy has concluded. All recommendations subject to approval of the companion GMP amendment. Prepared by: Josephine Medina, Principal Planner, Zoning Division ATTACHMENT(S) 1. Final Staff Report - Blue Coral Apartments RPUD 05.11.2021 (PDF) 2. RPUD Ordinance and Exhibts A-F - 081821 (PDF) 3. Public Comments - Blue Coral Apartments PUDZ (PDF) 4. [Linked] Transcript 05-20-21 CCPC Minutes Excerpt P53-79 (PDF) 5. CCPC 5.20.2021 Ordinance 04.20.2021 (PDF) 6. Attachment B Development Standards Comparison 5-7-2021 (PDF) 7. Attachment C - NIM Summary (flat) (PDF) 8. [Linked] Attachment D - Backup Material (PDF) 9. legal ad - agenda IDs 17456 and 17458 (PDF) 10. Signed Easement for Joint Access (PDF) 11. [Linked] Attachment E - CCPC Opposition Letters (PDF) 12. Hybrid Waiver Blue Coral Apartments PUDZ and GMPA (PDF) Packet Pg. 23 09/28/2021 COLLIER COUNTY Board of County Commissioners Item Number: 9.A Doc ID: 20090 Item Summary: *** This Item has been continued from the September 14, 2021 BCC Meeting Agenda. *** This item requires that ex parte disclosure be provided by Commission members. Should a hearing be held on this item, all participants are required to be sworn in. Recommendation to approve an Ordinance of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida amending Ordinance Number 2004-41, as amended, the Collier County Land Development Code, which established the comprehensive zoning regulations for the unincorporated area of Collier County, Florida, by amending the appropriate zoning atlas map or maps by changing the zoning classification of the herein described real property from an Agricultural (A) zoning district to a Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) zoning district for the project to be known as Blue Coral Apartments RPUD, to allow development of up to 234 multi -family rental units, of which 70 will be rent restricted as affordable. The subject property is located on the south side of Immokalee Road, approximately 1000 feet west of Juliet Boulevard, in Section 30, Township 48 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, consisting of 9.35f acres; and by providing an effective date. (PL20190001600) (This is a companion to Item PL20190001620 Agenda Item 9B) Meeting Date: 09/28/2021 Prepared by: Title: Sr. Operations Analyst — County Manager's Office Name: Geoffrey Willig 09/14/2021 2:57 PM Submitted by: Title: — Zoning Name: Mike Bosi 09/14/2021 2:57 PM Approved By: Review: Zoning Geoffrey Willig Additional Reviewer Skipped 09/14/2021 2:57 PM Zoning Geoffrey Willig Zoning Director Review Skipped 09/14/2021 2:57 PM Growth Management Department Geoffrey Willig Growth Management Department Skipped 09/14/2021 2:57 PM Growth Management Department Geoffrey Willig Growth Management Skipped 09/14/2021 2:57 PM Growth Management Department Geoffrey Willig Transportation Skipped 09/14/2021 2:57 PM County Attorney's Office Geoffrey Willig Level 2 Attorney of Record Review Skipped 09/14/2021 2:57 PM County Attorney's Office Geoffrey Willig Level 3 County Attorney's Office Review Skipped 09/14/2021 2:57 PM Office of Management and Budget Geoffrey Willig Additional Reviewer Skipped 09/14/2021 2:57 PM Office of Management and Budget Geoffrey Willig Level 3 OMB Gatekeeper Review Skipped 09/14/2021 2:57 PM Packet Pg. 24 9.A 09/28/2021 County Manager's Office Board of County Commissioners Geoffrey Willig Level 4 County Manager Review Geoffrey Willig Meeting Pending Completed 09/14/2021 3:32 PM 09/28/2021 9:00 AM Packet Pg. 25 9.A.a co t i ier Cou1.ty STAFF REPORT TO: COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: ZONING DIVISION — ZONING SERVICES SECTION GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT HEARING DATE: May 20, 2021 SUBJECT: PUDZ-PL20190001600 BLUE CORAL APARMENTS RPUD COMPANION GMPA, PL20190001600 PROPERTY OWNERS/APPLICANT/AGENT: Owner: William C Schere Trust c/o Excel Real Estate 9027 Alturas Ln #3305 Naples, FL 34113 Applicant: CIG Naples, LLC 226 East 81h Street Cincinnati, OH, 45202 REOUESTED ACTION: Agent: Patrick Vanasse RWA Inc. 6610 Willow Park Drive Naples, F134109 Agent: Jeff E. Wright Henderson, Franklin, Starnes & Holt 8889 Pelican Bay Blvd #400 Naples, FL, 34108 The applicant is requesting that the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) consider an application to rezone a property from Rural Agricultural (A) zoning district to a Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) zoning district for the project to be known as Blue Coral Apartments RPUD. There is a companion Small Scale GMPA for 9.35 acres related to this request. The subject property is comprised of one parcel. The total acreage for the PUD rezoning request is 9.35. GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The subject property is located at the on the south side of Immokalee Road approximately 1000 feet west of Juliet Boulevard in Section 30, Township 48 South, Range 26 East, Collier County (see location map, page 2). PUDZ-PL20190001600; Blue Coral Apartments RPUD Revised: May 11, 2021 Page 1 of 13 Packet Pg. 26 9.A.a D :3 0� CL YJ V g 0 U t - O r J ON DR CLLU ❑ d li!I�3uFNF- J U CL PUDZ-PL20190001600; Blue Coral Apartments RPUD Revised: May 11, 2021 CD CD CC r CD cm T J N E z m CL CL C 0 U 0 J Page 2 of 13 Packet Pg. 27 9.A.a PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: This petition seeks to rezone the property to RPUD to allow for the development of a 280-unit apartment complex and related accessory uses. SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING: North: Collier Boulevard, a six -lane arterial roadway, then developed residential, with a current zoning designation of Carlton Lakes PUD (3.4 DU/AC), which is approved for residential, commercial, recreational, conservation and water management uses South: Developed multi -family residential, with a current zoning designation of Livingston Lakes RPUD (6.99 DU/AC), which is approved for multi -family residential units and currently developed at 4.92 DU/AC. East: Undeveloped land, with current zoning designation of Germain Immokalee CPUD (80,000 SF Gross Floor Area), which is approved for a new and used automotive dealership West: Developed multi -family residential, with a current zoning designation of Eboli PUD AKA Bermuda Palms Condominiums (8.92 DU/AC), which is approved for multi- family residential units Aerial Map (Property Appraiser GIS) PUDZ-PL20190001600; Blue Coral Apartments RPUD Page 3 of 13 Revised: May 11, 2021 Packet Pg. 28 9.A.a GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN (GMP) CONSISTENCY: Future Land Use Element: Comprehensive Planning staff has reviewed the proposed PUD Rezone and has found it consistent with the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) of the GMP subject to the adoption of the companion GMPA-PL20190001620, Immokalee Road Interchange Residential Infill Subdistrict. Transportation Element: In evaluating this project, staff reviewed the applicant's May 29, 2020 Traffic Impact Statement for consistency with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the Growth Management Plan (GMP) using the then applicable 2019 Annual Update and Inventory Reports (AUIR). Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the GMP states: "The County Commission shall review all rezone petitions, SRA designation applications, conditional use petitions, and proposed amendments to the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) affecting the overall countywide density or intensity of permissible development, with consideration of their impact on the overall County transportation system, and shall not approve any petition or application that would directly access a deficient roadway segment as identified in the current AUIR or if it impacts an adjacent roadway segment that is deficient as identified in the current AUIR, or which significantly impacts a roadway segment or adjacent roadway segment that is currently operating and/or is projected to operate below an adopted Level of Service Standard within the five year AUIR planning period, unless specific mitigating stipulations are also approved. A petition or application has significant impacts if the traffic impact statement reveals that any of the following occur: a. For links (roadway segments) directly accessed by the project where project traffic is equal to or exceeds 2% of the adopted LOS standard service volume; b. For links adjacent to links directly accessed by the project where project traffic is equal to or exceeds 2% of the adopted LOS standard service volume; and c. For all other links the project traffic is considered to be significant up to the point where it is equal to or exceeds 3% of the adopted LOS standard service volume. Mitigating stipulations shall be based upon a mitigation plan prepared by the applicant and submitted as part of the traffic impact statement that addresses the project's significant impacts on all roadways. " Staff finding: According to the TIS provided with this petition the proposed 280 multi -family residential development will generate a projected total of +/- 119 PM peak hour, 2-way trips on the adjacent roadway segments of Immokalee Road. The trips generated by this development will occur on the following adjacent roadway network links using the current 2020 AUIR: Roadway/Link # Link 2020 Current Peak Projected 2020 AUIR Hour Peak P.M Peak Remaining LOS Direction Hour/Peak Capacity Volume/Peak Direction Direction PUDZ-PL20190001600; Blue Coral Apartments RPUD Page 4 of 13 Revised: May 11, 2021 Packet Pg. 29 9.A.a Project Traffic (1) Immokalee Airport Pulling D 3,100/East 12WB 729 Road/42.1 Rd. to Livingston Rd. Immokalee Livingston Rd. D 3,500/East 44/EB 450 Road/42.2 to I-75 (2) Expected Trip Bank Deficient 2028 Immokalee 1-75 to Logan D 3,500/East 5/EB 390 Road/43.1 Blvd. (2) Expected Trip Bank Deficient 2025 Livingston Imperial St. to B 3,000/North 7/NB 1,504 Road/51.0 Immokalee Rd. Livingston South of C 3,100/North 15/NB 858 Road/52.0 Immokalee Rd. Source for P.M. Peak Hour/Peak Direction Project Traffic is May 29, 2020; Traffic Impact Statement provided by the petitioner. z. Projected deficiencies for segments 42.2 and 43.1 are both due to projected background traffic from trip bank not caused by this development. Staff notes this section of Immokalee Road is within a current study area that includes intersection improvements that will improve capacity on the noted projected trip bank deficiencies. This study will be presented to the Board of County Commissioners later this year for consideration. This project is also within the Northwest Transportation Concurrently Management Area (TCMA) which currently operates with 97.1 % lane miles meeting standards. Applicable Florida Statute 163.3180 bullet points: ■ Facilities determined to be deficient with existing, committed, and vested trips plus projected background traffic from any source other than the development shall be removed from the proportionate share calculation. ■ The improvement necessary to correct this type of deficiency is the funding responsibility of the maintaining entity. ■ Applicant must receive a credit for the anticipated road impact fees. ■ Applicant will pay the required Collier County road impact fees as building permits are issued for the project. Based on the TIS provided by the applicant, the 2020 AUIR, and Florida State Statute 169.3180 the subject PUD can be found consistent with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the Growth Management Plan. Transportation Planning staff finds this petition consistent with the GMP. Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME): Environmental review staff has found this project to be consistent with the Conservation & Coastal Management Element PUDZ-PL20190001600; Blue Coral Apartments RPUD Page 5 of 13 Revised: May 11, 2021 Packet Pg. 30 9.A.a (CCME). The project site consists of 7.98 acres of native vegetation. A minimum of 1.18 (15%) acres of native vegetation shall be placed under preservation and dedicated to Collier County. GMP Conclusion: The proposed PUD Rezone may be deemed consistent with the FLUE of the GMP subject to the adoption of the companion GMPA-PL20190001620, the Immokalee Road Interchange Residential Infill Subdistrict. STAFF ANALYSIS: Staff has completed a comprehensive evaluation of this land use petition, including the criteria upon which a recommendation must be based, specifically noted in LDC Section 10.02.13.13.5, Planning Commission Recommendation (referred to as the "PUD Findings"), and Section 10.02.081, Nature of Requirements of Planning Commission Report (referred to as "Rezone Findings"), which establish the legal basis to support the CCPC's recommendation. Environmental Review: Environmental Planning staff has reviewed the petition to address environmental concerns. The Master Plan illustrates the minimum PUD preserve requirement in accordance with LDC 3.05.07. The required preserve is 1.18 acres (15% of 7.98 acres). No listed animal species were observed on the property; however, the site contains potential habitat for several listed species. The proposed project is located within the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) consultation area for Bonneted Bat (Eumops floridanus); however, no cavity trees were observed onsite. The subject property is located within a core foraging range for one wood stork (Mycteria americana) colony. Consultation with FWS may be needed to mitigate for impacts proposed onsite. Additionally, stiff -leaved wild pine (Tillandsia fasciculata), inflated wild pine (Tillandsia balbisiana), and Florida butterfly orchid (Encyclia tampensis), listed as Less Rare Plants in the LDC, were observed onsite and will be protected in accordance with LDC 3.04.03. Transportation Review: Transportation Planning staff has reviewed the petition for compliance with the GMP and the LDC and recommends approval. School District: Review from School District was solicited but no response was provided. Utilities Review: The project lies within the regional potable water service area and the north wastewater service area of the Collier County Water -Sewer District (CCWSD). The developer has committed to completing a minimum 8" County water main loop between the Germain Immokalee PUD to the east and the Eboli PUD (AKA Bermuda Palms) to the west (or else the 20" water main on the north side of Immokalee Road). Zoning Services Review: FLUE Policy 5.4 requires new land uses to be compatible with, and complementary to, the surrounding land uses. In reviewing the appropriateness of the requested uses and intensity on the subject site, the compatibility analysis included a review of the subject proposal comparing it to surrounding or nearby properties as to allowed use intensities and densities, development standards (building heights, setbacks, landscape buffers, etc.), building mass, building location and orientation, architectural features, amount and type of open space and location. PUDZ-PL20190001600; Blue Coral Apartments RPUD Page 6 of 13 Revised: May 11, 2021 Packet Pg. 31 9.A.a The proposed RPUD requests a maximum of 280-unit apartment complex at a maximum of 30 DU/Acre with 35 units (12.5%) being proposed as rent restricted units for Essential Service Personnel (ESP). The property is 9.35 acres with 1.18 acres of the southernmost portion of the property shall be designated as preserve. The Development Standards Comparison Table shows the development standards for principal and accessory structures being proposed within the Blue Coral Apartments RPUD compared to the surrounding residential PUD and undeveloped Kase MPUD. The RPUD proposes a maximum zoned height for principal structures as 55 feet and actual height of 60 feet. The proposed height would not be compatible the surrounding neighborhood. The site is separated from Carlton Lakes PUD to the north by Immokalee road, a 6-lane divided median arterial road. Carlton Lakes PUD was approved with a maximum zoned height of 50 feet and is currently developed with two story structures. The property to the west, Bermuda Palms Condominiums AKA Eboli PUD was approved with an actual building height of 35 feet, with maximum zoned height of 30 feet or two stories. The recently approved Germain Immokalee CPUD to the east has a maximum actual building height of 60 feet and zoned height of 55 feet. The property to the south is Livingston Lakes PUD is developed has a maximum principal building height of 35 feet or 2 stories whichever is greater. A reduction in the maximum actual height to 50 feet would make the property more compatible with surrounding residential uses while at the same time create a transition between commercial and residential to the east. The RPUD proposes a 150 foot front setback from the Immokalee Road right-of-way and a 150 foot rear setback from the south property. Proposed side setbacks to the west of 80 feet and to the east of 25 feet. The Master Plan proposes a 15-foot wide "Type D" buffer along Immokalee Road on the north boundary of the PUD, and a 15-foot "Type B" buffer along the east and west boundaries of the PUD. These buffers are consistent with the required buffers of the surrounding properties. The increased buffering is being proposed along eastern and southern boundary which only require a 10-foot "Type A" buffer per the LDC. Zoning staff can recommend that this petition be found compatible with, and complementary to, the surrounding land uses, pursuant to the requirement of FLUE Policy 5.4 subject to reducing the actual maximum height for the principal structure from 60 feet to 50 feet. PUD FINDINGS: LDC Section 10.02.13.B.5 states that "In support of its recommendation, the CCPC shall make findings as to the PUD Master Plan's compliance with the following criteria in addition to the findings in LDC Section 10.02.08": (Zoning Division staff responses in non -bold). 1. The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer, water, and other utilities. The nearby properties are developed or have been approved for uses of a similar nature. Water and wastewater transmission mains are readily available along Immokalee Road, PUDZ-PL20190001600; Blue Coral Apartments RPUD Page 7 of 13 Revised: May 11, 2021 Packet Pg. 32 9.A.a and a water distribution main is available near the northwest corner of the PUD. A future water distribution main will be made available for looping when the adjacent Germain Immokalee PUD is developed. There are adequate water and wastewater treatment capacities to serve the proposed PUD. 2. Adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of any proposed agreements, contracts, or other instruments, or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense. Documents submitted with the application were reviewed by the County Attorney's Office and demonstrate unified control. 3. Conformity of the proposed Planned Unit Development with the goals, objectives, and policies of the Growth Management Plan (GMP). Comprehensive Planning staff has reviewed the petition and analyzed it for consistency with goals, objectives, and policies of the GMP. They have found the proposed rezoning to be consistent with the GMP, if the companion amendment is approved. 4. The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include restrictions on the location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening requirements. There are no deviations being requested from the buffering and screening requirements. Compliance with approved standards would be demonstrated at the time of SDP. 5. The adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the development. There is no deviation from the required usable open space as submitted. Compliance with approved standards would be demonstrated at the time of SDP. 6. The timing or sequence of development for the purpose of ensuring the adequacy of available improvements and facilities, both public and private. Compliance with all other applicable concurrency management regulations is required, including but not limited to, plat plans or site development plans. The Public Utilities Division states that the area has adequate supporting infrastructure, including readily available County water and wastewater mains, to accommodate this project. As noted above, Transportation Planning staff finds this petition consistent with the GMP. Operational impacts will be addressed at time of first development order (SDP or Plat), at which time a new TIS will be required to demonstrate turning movements for all site access points. Finally, the project's development must comply with all other applicable concurrency management regulations when development approvals, including but not limited to any plats and or site development plans, are sought. 7. The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate PUDZ-PL20190001600; Blue Coral Apartments RPUD Page 8 of 13 Revised: May 11, 2021 Packet Pg. 33 9.A.a expansion. As noted above, Transportation Planning staff finds this petition consistent with the GMP. Operational impacts will be addressed at time of first development order (SDP or Plat). Additionally, the project's development must comply with all other applicable concurrency management regulations when development approvals are sought. & Conformity with PUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the particular case, based on a determination that such modifications are justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to the literal application of such regulations. There are no deviations proposed for the requested RPUD. REZONE FINDINGS: LDC Subsection 10.02.08 F. states, "When pertaining to the rezoning of land, the report and recommendations to the Planning Commission to the Board of County Commissioners ... shall show that the Planning Commission has studied and considered the proposed change in relation to the following when applicable." Zoning Division staff responses are in non -bold: 1. Whether the proposed change will be consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the Future Land Use Map (FLUM) and the elements of the GMP. Comprehensive Planning staff has determined the petition is consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the FLUM and other elements of the GMP, if the companion small scale amendment is approved. 2. The existing land use pattern. The existing land use pattern related to surrounding properties is described in the Surrounding Land Use and Zoning section of this report. The proposed uses will not change the existing land use patterns in the area. There are various multifamily developments within the surrounding properties. 3. The possible creation of an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts. The property is zoned A — Rural Agricultural. The application is to rezone to a residential PUD (RPUD), would not create an isolated district. The site, with exception to the properties to the commercial PUD approved to the east, is surrounded by residential PUDs. The current zoning district itself is an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts. 4. Whether existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the property proposed for change. The existing district boundaries are logically drawn. The proposed PUD boundaries are logical and appropriate. 5. Whether changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed rezoning PUDZ-PL20190001600; Blue Coral Apartments RPUD Page 9 of 13 Revised: May 11, 2021 Packet Pg. 34 9.A.a necessary. The proposed change is not necessary. It is a request to rezone by the property owner. 6. Whether the proposed change will adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood. The proposed change will not adversely influence living conditions within the neighborhood. 7. Whether the proposed change will create or excessively increase traffic congestion or create types of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses, because of peak volumes or projected types of vehicular traffic, including activity during construction phases of the development, or otherwise affect public safety. The area has adequate supporting infrastructure, including readily available County water and wastewater mains, to accommodate this project. The Transportation Division states that the roadway infrastructure has adequate capacity to serve the proposed project at this time, i.e., GMP consistent at the time of rezoning as evaluated as part of the GMP Transportation Element consistency review. Operational impacts will be addressed at time of first development order (SDP or Plat). Additionally, the project's development must comply with all other applicable concurrency management regulations when development approvals are sought. & Whether the proposed change will create a drainage problem. It is not anticipated that the rezone request to RPUD will create drainage problems in the area. Stormwater best management practices, treatment, and storage for this project will be addressed through Environmental Resource Permitting (ERP) with the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD). County environmental staff will evaluate the stormwater management system and design criteria at the time of SDP. 9. Whether the proposed change will seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas. As existing the property is undeveloped, if approved with the recommended maximum zoned height of 55 feet and maximum actual height of 60 feet, there would be a reduction of light and air to adjacent properties. The height of the conceptual building envelope would seriously reduce light and air to adjacent properties particularly to the west and east of the proposed development. The submitted illustrative masterplan and project narrative conceptually proposes the breaking up of the building massing with two large courtyards and a built-in parking garage at a 35 foot maximum actual height within the overall principal building structure facing the Eboli PUD to the west mitigate to some extent the reduction of air and light this change would provide to adjacent area. The location of the proposed 1.18-acre preservation area in the southernmost portion of the property as illustrated as Tract A in the masterplan mitigates to some extent the reduction of air and light the Livingston Lakes PUD. Staff opines that the mentioned mitigations would be more effective with a reduction to the maximum actual zoned height from 60 to 50 feet. PUDZ-PL20190001600; Blue Coral Apartments RPUD Page 10 of 13 Revised: May 11, 2021 Packet Pg. 35 9.A.a 10. Whether the proposed change will adversely affect property values in the adjacent areas. This is a subjective determination based upon anticipated results, which may be internal or external to the subject property. Property valuation is affected by a host of factors including zoning; however, zoning by itself may or may not affect values, since value determination is driven by market value. 11. Whether the proposed change will be a deterrent to the improvement or development of adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations. Most of the adjacent properties are already developed for commercial or residential uses. The approval of the rezone request from Rural Agricultural District (A) to RPUD is not likely to deter development activity of surrounding property. 12. Whether the proposed change will constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual owner as contrasting with the public welfare. If the proposed rezone to RPUD complies with the GMP (if companion amendment is approved) and is found consistent, then it is consistent with public policy and the change does not result in the granting of a special privilege. Consistency with the FLUE is determined to be consistent with public welfare. 13. Whether there are substantial reasons why the property cannot be used in accordance with existing zoning. The subject property can be used in accordance with existing zoning; however, the applicant wishes to develop the property for a residential multifamily use and at a greater density than would be allowed be the current zoning. The applicant finds the rezoning to be necessary. 14. Whether the change suggested is out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the County. The Zoning Division staff determination is that at the proposed height the multifamily use is out of scale with the needs of the community; the proposed maximum actual height for the principal structure of 60 feet compared to the surrounding two-story residential structures at 35 feet. The adjacent undeveloped commercial parcel known as Germain Immokalee CPUD to the east was approved with a maximum actual height of 60 feet and maximum zoned height of 55 feet for the principal structure. A reduction of maximum height by 10 feet to 50 feet actual height for this development would create a more appropriate transition in scale from commercial to the existing two-story multifamily developments in the neighborhood. 15. Whether is it impossible to find other adequate sites in the County for the proposed use in districts already permitting such use. PUDZ-PL20190001600; Blue Coral Apartments RPUD Page 11 of 13 Revised: May 11, 2021 Packet Pg. 36 9.A.a The application was reviewed and found compliant with the GMP (if the companion amendment is approved) and the LDC. The Zoning Division staff does not review other sites related to a specific petition. 16. The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site alteration, which would be required to make the property usable for any of the range of potential uses under the proposed zoning classification. Any development anticipated by the RPUD Document would require considerable site alteration, and this project will undergo extensive evaluation relative to all federal, state, and local development regulations during the SDP and/or platting processes, and again later as part of the building permit process. 17. The impact of development on the availability of adequate public facilities and services consistent with the levels of service adopted in the Collier County Growth Management Plan and as defined and implemented through the Collier County Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance, as amended. This petition has been reviewed by County staff responsible for jurisdictional elements of the GMP as part of the amendment process and those staff persons have concluded that no Level of Service will be adversely impacted. M Such other factors, standards, or criteria that the Board of County Commissioners shall deem important in the protection of the public health, safety, and welfare. To be determined by the BCC during its advertised public hearing. DEVIATION DISCUSSION: The petitioner is seeking not seeking deviations from the requirements of the LDC. NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING (NIM): The applicant conducted a NIM on August 25, 2020, 6:00 PM, at the New Hope Ministries at 7675 Davis Boulevard, Naples, FL 34104. Meeting commenced at approximately 6:02 PM and ended at 6:15 PM. The applicant's agent at the time, Tom Barber with Agnoli, Barber & Brundage, conducted the meeting with introductions of the consultant team and staff. Mr. Barber provided an overview of the small-scale Growth Management Plan Amendment and proposed PUD rezone application to allow a 280-unit multifamily residential development and associated accessory uses. There are some workforce units being proposed at 80 to 100 percent of the area median income. There will be preserves on the south portion of the property with required landscape buffers. Following the agent's presentation, the meeting was opened to attendees to make comments and ask the consultant team. There were two members of the public present online and no questions were asked. PUDZ-PL20190001600; Blue Coral Apartments RPUD Page 12 of 13 Revised: May 11, 2021 Packet Pg. 37 9.A.a A copy of the sign in sheet, handouts, and NIM summary are included in the backup material Attachment C. ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL (EACI RECOMMENDATION: This project does not require Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) review, as this project did not meet the EAC scope of land development project reviews as identified in Section 2-1193 of the Collier County Codes of Laws and Ordinances. COUNTY ATTORNEY OFFICE REVIEW: The County Attorney's Office reviewed this staff report on May 11, 2021. RECOMMENDATION: Zoning Division staff recommends the CCPC forward petition PUDZ-PL20190001600 Blue Coral Apartments RPUD to the Board of County Commissioners with a recommendation of approval, subject to reducing the actual maximum height for the principal structure from 60 feet to 50 feet and the revision to the Master Plan (Exhibit C) to identify a 25 foot setback from the eastern property line. Attachments: A) Proposed Blue Coral Apartments RPUD Ordinance B) Development Standards Comparisons C) NIM Transcript D) Back up material E) Opposition Letters PUDZ-PL20190001600; Blue Coral Apartments RPUD Page 13 of 13 Revised: May 11, 2021 Packet Pg. 38 9.A.b ORDINANCE NO.2021 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 2004-41, AS AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, WHICH ESTABLISHED THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BY AMENDING THE APPROPRIATE ZONING ATLAS MAP OR MAPS BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY FROM AN AGRICULTURAL (A) ZONING DISTRICT TO A RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (RPUD) ZONING DISTRICT FOR THE PROJECT TO BE KNOWN AS BLUE CORAL APARTMENTS RPUD, TO ALLOW DEVELOPMENT OF UP TO 234 MULTI -FAMILY RENTAL UNITS, OF WHICH 70 WILL BE RENT RESTRICTED AS AFFORDABLE. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF IMMOKALEE ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 1000 FEET WEST OF JULIET BOULEVARD, IN SECTION 30, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, CONSISTING OF 9.35t ACRES; AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. [PL20190001600] WHEREAS, CIG, LLC, petitioned the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, to change the zoning classification of the herein described real property. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that: SECTION ONE: The zoning classification of the herein described real property located in Section 30, Township 48 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, is changed from Agricultural (A) Zoning District to a Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) for a 9.35± acre project to be known as Blue Coral Apartments RPUD, to allow 234 multi -family rental units, in accordance with Exhibits A through F-1 attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein. The appropriate zoning atlas map or maps, as described in Ordinance Number 2004-41, as amended, [20-CPS-01987/1635840/1] 170 Blue Coral Apartments /PL20190001600 08/18/21 Page 1 Packet Pg. 39 9.A.b the Collier County Land Development Code, is/are hereby amended accordingly. SECTION TWO: This Ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Department of State and on the date that the Growth Management Plan Amendment in Ordinance No. 2021 - becomes effective. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by super -majority vote of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this day of 2021. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS CRYSTAL K. KINZEL, CLERK COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA By: , Deputy Clerk Approved as to form and legality: Heidi Ashton-Cicko' Managing Assistant County Attorney Penny Taylor, Chairman Attachments: Exhibit A - List of Permitted Uses Exhibit B - Development and Design Standards Exhibit C - Master Concept Plan Exhibit D - Legal Description Exhibit E - Deviations Exhibit F - Development Commitments Exhibit F-1- Buffer Exhibit [20-CPS-01987/1635840/1] 170 Blue Coral Apartments /PL20190001600 08/18/21 Page 2 0 a W as E a 4 cc L 0 L) a) 7 t>D O O to 0 0 0 o� 0 N J a 0 CD 0 O N Packet Pg. 40 9.A.b EXHIBIT "A" Permitted Uses: The Blue Coral Apartments shall be developed as a Residential use project, which will include studio, one bedroom, two bedroom and three -bedroom apartments with a density of 25 units per acre. The maximum unit total for this PUD shall be 234. Regulations for development of this PUD shall be in accordance with the contents of this document and all applicable sections of the Growth Management Plan (GMD), the Land Development Code (LDC), and the AdministrativeCode in effect at the time of approval of the first Site Development Plan (SDP) or plat. Where the PUD ordinance does not provide development standards, then the provision of thespecific sections of the LDC that are otherwise applicable shall apply. Tract A A. Principal Uses: 1. Preserve B. Accessory Uses: The only accessory uses allowed in the preserve area would be those permitted under LDC sections 4.06.02, 4.06.05.E.I and 3.05.07. Tract B A. Principal Uses: 1. Multi -Family Rental Units 2. Any other principal use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing list of permitted principal uses, as determined by Hearing Examiner or the Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA) by the process outlined in the LDC. B. Accessory Uses: Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with the permitted principal uses and structures including, but not limited to: 1. Parking garage limited to residents and their guests. 2. Leasing Center 3. Fitness Facility limited to residents and their guests. 4. Clubhouse limited to residents and their guests. 5. Pools/Hot Tubs limited to residents and their guests. 6. Uses and Structures that are accessory and incidental to the Multifamily Residential use. Page 1 of 10 PL20190001600 Blue Coral Apartments PUDZ 8/9/2021 Packet Pg. 41 9.A.b EXHIBIT B DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS: Table I below sets forth the development standards for land uses within the proposed Blue Coral Apartments. Standards not specifically set forth within this application shall be those specified in applicable sections of the LDC in effect as of the date of approval of the SDP or Subdivision plat, consistent with RMF-16 zoning. TABLE I DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS PRINCIPAL USES ACCESSORY USES MINIMUM LOT AREA 43,560 Sq. Ft. N/A MINIMUM LOT WIDTH 150 Ft. NIA MINIMUM YARDS (External)* From North 150 Ft. SIPS From South 150 Ft. SIPS From West 80 Ft. SIPS From East 25 Ft. SIPS MIN. DISTANCE BETWEEN STRUCTURES 50% of the bldg. height, not less than 15' SPS MAXIMUM HEIGHT* Zoned 50 Ft. Actual 50 Ft. Zoned 30 Ft. Actual 30 Ft. MINIMUM FLOOR AREA Studio=450 sf 1 BR=600 sf 2+BR=750 sf Preserve 25' 10, * The proposed parking garage is considered an accessory use/structure whether it is attached or detached from the principal structure. It will meet accessory use development standards above. If the parking garage is constructed under the principal structure, the combined height may not exceed the actual height of 50 feet. PL20190001600 Blue Coral Apartments PUDZ 8/9/2021 Page 2 of 10 Packet Pg. 42 9.A.b ti -•� j vYaiil+9J®Y .In :s — IM uleaoa= v1 Nee 1 h ai .a. V 1 � � .D1:1Yi 125 TI�1�NW.Se� 1 a I 1 4 c 1 t I G >> i n 'c � I 1 o > 0 0 8 I n p > g D �pp Z a ^a $ n o m 1 1 ! 1 c I n � T A o I ! M r j! 11 it C a l 1 i Z (/M 3 11 N �y ti AP�1'oDP � l 1 o � Z r D _ — — — —-----------r — ` Z D n I Ili; - — -- ____o�Np M ic,,a o` m - r r _ _.. _._ (AVM,10L Jfa ADII - _-.. - -r'. ! N O rn '91 v G 43Y07 $MIOWIVk � - - - - - - — - - - - - - - R - - - - - - Z W W PL20190001600 Blue Coral Apartments PUDZ 8/9/2021 Page 3 of 10 Packet Pg. 43 9.A.b Exhibit D LEGAL DESCRIPTION (O.R. 5460. PAGE 32) SECTION 30, TOWNSHIP 48-RANGE 26 W'h OF E'/ OF NW'/4 OF NW%, LESS N 100 FT R/W COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA. PL20190001600 Blue Coral Apartments PUDZ 8/9/2021 Page 4 of 10 Packet Pg. 44 9.A.b Exhibit "E" No deviations are requested. PL20190001600 Blue Coral Apartments PUDZ 8/9/2021 Page 5 of 10 Packet Pg. 45 9.A.b EXHIBIT F LIST OF DEVELOPER COMMITMENTS The purposed of this Section is to set forth the development commitments for the development of this project. 1. One entity (hereinafter the Managing Entity) shall be responsible for PUD monitoring until close-out of the PUD, and this entity shall also be responsible for satisfying all PUDcommitments until close-out of the PUD. At the time of this PUD approval, the Managing Entity is CIG Naples, LLC., or its assigns. Should the Managing Entity desire to transfer the monitoring and commitments to a successor entity, then it must provide a copy of a legally binding document that needs to be approved for legal sufficiency by theCounty Attorney. After such approval, the Managing Entity will be released of its obligations upon written approval of the transfer by County staff, and the successor entity shall become the Managing Entity. As Owner and Developer sell off tracts, the Managing Entity shall provide written notice to County that includes an acknowledgement of the commitments required by the PUD by the new owner and the new owner's agreement to comply with the Commitments through the Managing Entity, but the Managing Entity shall not be relieved of its responsibility underthis Section. When the PUD is closed -out, then the Managing Entity is no longer responsible for the monitoring and fulfillment of PUD commitments. 2. Issuance of a development permit by a county does not in any way create any rights onthe part of the applicant to obtain a permit from a state or federal agency and does not create any liability on the part of the county for issuance of the permit if the applicant fails to obtain requisite approvals or fulfill the obligations imposed by a state or federalagency or undertakes actions that result in a violation of state or federal law." (Section 125.022, FS) 3. All other applicable state or federal permits must be obtained before commencement ofthe development. 1 of 4 Page 6 of 10 PL20190001600 Blue Coral Apartments PUDZ 8/9/2021 Packet Pg. 46 9.A.b 4. The Master Plan, attached hereto as Exhibit C (Agnoli Barber & Brundage Project No. 20-0003) is an illustrative preliminary development plan. The design elements and layoutillustrated on the Master Plan shall be understood to be flexible, so that the final design may satisfy the Developer's criteria and comply with all applicable requirements of this Ordinance. Changes may be made in accordance with the LDC. 1. The maximum vehicle trip generation for the PUD shall not exceed 100 two-way PM peakhour net new external trips based on the use codes in the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual in effect at the time of application for SDP or plat approval. 2. Access to the project will be via a shared access with the property to the east (currently owned by JAZ Automotive Properties LLC) on the eastern property line of this project. If the shared access split by the property line is not granted, a single access will be providedon the subject property only. Developer shall not be required to provide interconnection to the adjacent property to the west or adjacent properties to the east, but commits to cooperating with said adjacent property owners, if, at some time in the future, all of the above referenced adjacent property owners request an interconnection to the subject property. Design, permitting and construction of the shared access shall be at the time of the first SDP or Plat. 3. Access points shown on the PUD Master Plan are considered to be conceptual. Nothing depicted on any such Master Plan shall vest any right of access at any specific point along any property boundary. The number of access points constructed may be less than the number depicted on the Master Plan; however, no additional access points shall be considered unless a PUD amendment is approved. 4. All internal roads, driveways, alleys, pathways, sidewalks, interconnections to adjacent developments shall be operated and maintained by an entity created by the developer in accordance with the applicable regulations of the State of Florida. Collier County shall have no responsibility for maintenance of any such facilities. 5. If any required turn lane improvement requires the use of any existing County rights of way or easement(s), then compensating right-of-way shall be provided at no cost to CollierCounty as a consequence of such improvement(s). 6. Fifteen (15) feet of the northernmost portion of the property just west of the proposed shared access shall be dedicated to Collier County in the form of a road easement in orderto accommodate a right -in eastbound turn lane. Owner shall convey the fifteen (15) foot easement to Collier County at no cost to the County at PL20190001600 Blue Coral Apartments PUDZ 8/9/2021 Page 7 of 10 Packet Pg. 47 9.A.b the time of Site Development Plan approval, free and clear of all liens and encumbrances. The southernmost portion of the property shall have a designated preserve. The area of thepreserve shall equate to 15% of the native vegetation on the site. Total native vegetation on the site is 7.89 acres (Passarella & Associates, Inc, Project No. 20CJG3219). 7.89 acresx 15% =1.18 acre preserve. 2. Preserves may be used to satisfy the landscape buffer requirements after exotic vegetation removal in accordance with LDC sections 4.06.02 and 4.06.05.E. I Supplemental plantings with native plant materials shall be in accordance with LDC section 3.05.07. 3. Ten (10) feet of the southernmost portion of the southern twenty five (25) foot principal setback from the preserve shall have no site alteration, placement of fill, grading, plant alteration or removal or similar activity abutting the preserve. 1. Storm water shall not be discharged into the preserve area until it has been fully treated inaccordance with Collier County and Water Management District standards. 1. The developer shall complete a minimum 8" water main loop between the adjacent Eboli(AKA Bermuda Palms) and Germain Immokalee PUDs. The water main shall connect the existing 8" water main serving Bermuda Palms to a future 8" water main to be extended through Germain Immokalee from an existing 8" water main stub -out at Useppa Way. Ifa point of connection at Germain Immokalee does not exist at the time of project development, the water main shall be terminated at the property line with an automatic water main flushing device, as shown in detail W- 2 of the Collier County Utilities Standards Manual, ordinance No. 2004-31. If a connection to the existing 8" water main serving Bermuda Palms is deemed infeasible by Collier County staff at the time of project development, the developer shall instead connect to the existing 20" water main on the north side of Immokalee Road. The water main will be conveyed to the Collier County Water - Sewer District within a County Utility Easement (CUE) at least 15 feet in width, in accordance with the Collier County Utilities Standards and Procedures Ordinance, at no cost to the County or District, and free and clear of all liens and encumbrances, prior to or concurrent with preliminary acceptance of utilities. PL20190001600 Blue Coral Apartments PUDZ 8/9/2021 Page 8 of 10 Packet Pg. 48 9.A.b 1. Thirty percent (30%) of the total units (70 units) will be rented to Essential Services Personnel ("ESP"). ESP means natural persons or families at least one of whom is employed as police or fire personnel, a child care worker, a teacher or other education personnel, health care personnel or a public employee. Any time that a unit becomes vacant, assuming that less than 70 units are occupied by ESP, the next available unit will be offered to ESP. In the event that no ESP rents the available unit within forty- five (45) days of advertisement of its availability, then the unit may be offered to the general public. This commitment to ESP shall remain in effect for a period of time that is 30 years from the date that the development receives its final certificate of occupancy. 2. Notwithstanding paragraph 1 above, the seventy (70) units will be income and rent restricted. Of the seventy units (70), thirty-five (35) of the units will be designated for those households whose incomes are less than 80% of the AMI for Collier County and thirty-five (35) of the units will be designated for households whose incomes are between 80% and 100% of the AMI for Collier County. These units will be committed for a period of 30 years and AMI rent limit adjustments will be made on an annual basis according to the most recent Collier County Board approved Table of Rental Rates for each income category and the number of bedrooms in the unit. 1. An enhanced 15' Type "B" Buffer will be provided along the western property boundary, as depicted in Exhibit F-1. The buffer will contain a single row of canopy trees, which shall be a minimum of twenty feet (20') in height at time of planting and shall be spaced twenty-five feet (25') on center; a midstory of two clustered Dahoon Holly trees offset between canopy trees, which shall be 12' in height at the time of planting ,and spaced twenty-five feet on center; and a sixty inch (60") hedge with #10 shrubs spaced four feet (4') on center. The hedge shall be located a maximum of 10' from the western property line. PL20190001600 Blue Coral Apartments PUDZ 8/9/2021 Page 9 of 10 Packet Pg. 49 9.A.b I n c A O N = - 15' PERIMETER o O - _ o BUFFER n _ �z�z I'�.----y D = �O M D p W 2 Z° r➢ .< z A 5 o z D n m D z Z m C)in G1 n A W D 3 z 9 2 p m o O v W x z 7: w > n z 1 � m Z C r m N ° O < m D m Z m 0 mCLlp in Z $$ Y m O MM Z p ,sv m < N x Z D A N rn O Z N D+ DI Z N o o z O r� m z z rn n z m -" ----- CD n p 4 D z czi n g r) m I Oz CD 0 = r rn 7.5' PUE K `f c rn IOU + n ao cn rn f �1 I„ .. D k,m 0Z 9 d zrn c� D- � i� € Z- z m -n 70 � ti¢ w T z m A n Wtt Z {�j �W' + r Z 0 C T tMc p 1 �o rn -n { D x co n m m D c r rz,, O z ca Z p � m < � m �Orn o z z Z co 0 ^7 li w U) CD Q Q L 0 U d 7 m 0 0 w r 0 0 0 rn 0 N d O CD O O Page 10 of 10 PL20190001600 Blue Coral Apartments PUDZ 8/9/2021 Packet Pg. 50 9.A.c MedinaJosephine From: Babette Densmore <jbdensmore@gmail.com> Sent: Wednesday, August 11, 2021 5:34 PM To: MedinaJosephine Cc: LINDA DURKEE; Diane Doherty; Bermuda Palms of Naples Condominium Assoc, Inc - Dennis Lively; John Shupeniuk Subject: Blue Coral Apartments EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Ms. Medina, I live in Bermuda Palms which is next to the property where Blue Coral Apartments are slated to be built. First I'd like to thank you for your time to communicate with my neighbor, Linda Durkee as she has asked many good questions about how Blue Coral will affect our lives over here in the tranquil Bermuda Palms Condos. There is concern over Blue Coral usurping some of the property from Bermuda Palms to be used as an access to Blue Coral. Certainly this would have a negative impact on me as a resident of Bermuda Palms and perhaps for the other residents here as well. (The trees coming down are also disheartening and the size of the proposed buildings/structures is shocking. I bought in Bermuda Palms because it was quiet and peaceful. This is all about to change.) I drove up and down Immokalee Road and made note of some of the single access entries into condos and businesses. Most all have Packet Pg. 51 9.A.c only one entrance/exit. I'm baffled as to why Blue Coral would be so unique as to require more than one entrance/exit. Single entrance/exits on Immokalee include but definitely not only these: SW Health Park, Veterans Commons Park, Southwind Estates, Stonebridge Country Club, Regent Park, St. Croix, Windsong, Bermuda Palms, Tarpon Bay, Faith Bible Church, Eagles Nest Worship, Saint Monica Episcopal, The Strand, and Seed to Table. I am voicing my concern in hopes this will make it into the documents that are reviewed and taken into consideration at the upcoming meeting. I am against the use of Bermuda Palms Property as an entrance/exit for Blue Coral Apartments. Thank you again, for your help with this matter. Respectfully, Babette Densmore 4985 Sandra Bay Drive # 105 Bermuda Palms Condominiums Naples, FL 34109 Living God's Love 2 Packet Pg. 52 9.A.c TO: Board of Collier County FROM: Linda Durkee, Owner and Resident, Bermuda Palms DATE: August 17, 2021 RE: Comments on Proposed Blue Coral Apartments The overly dense Blue Coral Apartments rental development proposed for construction next to Bermuda Palms on Immokalee Road in Naples, FL, has a number of problems that bear correcting. ACCESS: It needs a confirmed ingress/egress to Immokalee Road that does not involve Bermuda Palms. The design lays out an optional access point through Bermuda Palms, subject to neighbor approval. The Bermuda Palms of Naples Condominium Association submitted a petition to the Collier County Planning Commission strenuously opposing use of Bermuda Palms as an access point. Where will the access point for Blue Coral Apartments be? TRAFFIC: Immokalee Road is choking with traffic. I often have difficulty getting onto it safely. Road accidents are becoming all too frequent. It is a worry. We know that Immokalee Road will be a gateway to the intensive development planned east of 1-75. It is also an artery for the accumulating number of new developments in North Naples. Yet Blue Coral Apartments would add vehicle trips from 234 units, dumping the traffic onto the already congested and unsafe road segment between Livingston Road and Juliet Boulevard as well as the segment to 1-75 in a 45-mile- per-hour speed zone. This vehicular traffic would come on top of the traffic allowed (1) for the abutting Germaine Lexus and (2) for the residential development of up to 212 group -housing units or 75 residential units approved for the site immediately around the corner from Immokalee Road on Livingston Road, which now has the abutting Livingston Lakes development as well. This intersection and section of Immokalee Road are rapidly headed to failure with lengthening commute times and endangered safety to vehicles, bicyclers, and pedestrians, including children. DENSITY: The use density would be too high and therefore harmful. Blue Coral Apartments is approved for 25 units per acre, for a total of 234. The applicant sought 30 units per acre. The Collier County Planning Commission staff report recommended 20 units per acre, citing a loss of natural light and air to Bermuda Palms. However, during the final Commission hearing, the specification of 25 units per acre was adopted. Loss of air and natural light to Bermuda Palms would continue to result. The building height of 60 feet proposed by the applicant was reduced to 50 feet, but this would still be out of scale with neighboring developments, including Bermuda Palms, which tend to have two and three stories. Packet Pg. 53 9.A.c It also would have a large urban parking garage, out of character for this residential area. The artificial light, noise, and pollution resulting from this density would harm the environmental quality of Bermuda Palms, adversely affect its residential quality, and interfere with residents' privacy. The number of units per acre needs to be decreased. LANDSCAPING: The close proximity of this overly dense development necessitates a buffer with adequate landscaping. The improvements agreed to by the applicant are better but insufficient. The plantings would not be high enough. The tallest trees would grow to only 25 feet, but Blue Coral Apartments would be 50 feet. The spacing between the plantings would be too wide with too many gaps. There needs to be additional, taller trees. The hedge needs to be taller and thicker. Numerous developments along Immokalee Road and nearby areas, including Carlton Lakes and Verona Pointe, have fuller landscaping. Not insignificantly, the development would have the existing old growth, tall trees currently there eliminated. ENVIRONMENT: Several listed species may have habitat on the site. The project is said to be within the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service consultation area for bonneted bats and one wood stork colony's foraging range. The potential risk to these species needs to be assessed before the project can go forward. Thank you for your consideration. Packet Pg. 54 9.A.c U Ue::\1 U TO: Board of Collier County FROM: Diane Doherty President, Board of Directors Bermuda Palms of Naples Condominium Association, Inc. DATE: August 18, 2021 RE: Blue Coral Development This is a follow-up to Ms. Durkee's Comments on August 17, 2021. We are in agreement that all of the comments present very legitimate concerns regarding the Blue Coral Development that need serious consideration by the Board. Just to elaborate on a few of her concerns: * ACCESS - It is unclear that the developer has a "green light" for Ingress/Egress into Blue Coral other than depending on the Germain Lexus Car Dealership for this access. The Developer needs to come up with a separate plan that does not include Bermuda Plans for access. * LANDSCAPING - There is a natural buffer that currently exists between Bermuda Palms and the proposed Blue Coral Development. Why not capitalize on what already exists and add to it as appropriate. Mature 23' trees are not going to mask the view of a 50' buildings. Thank you for your consideration. Packet Pg. 55 9.A.c From: Perry, Jeff <Jeff.Perry@stantec.com> Sent: Wednesday, August 18, 2021 12:04 PM To: MoscaMichele; MedinaJosephine Subject: PL20190001600 Blue Coral Apartments PUDZ and Companion GMPA Attachments: Blue Coral - Removal of Objection to Development - August 2021 - signed.pdf EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Please find attached correspondence related to the Blue Coral Apartment rezone and Growth Management Plan amendments, supporting the proposed language changes to the PUDZ and GMPA submitted by the applicant that removes the applicant's obligation to interconnect to the immediately adjacent properties, and sets forth conditions for any future consideration of an interconnection. It is our understanding that the text/language changes submitted by the applicant after consideration by the representatives of the neighboring properties (Germain PUD and Gaspar Station PUD), as subsequently modified by the County Attorney's Office and/or County Planning Staff, still maintains the original intent of the applicant's proposed changes, i.e., requiring unanimous support from representatives from all affected properties, including Gaspar Station PUD, before any future interconnection is made. Based on this understanding, the representative of the Gaspar Station Owner's Association and the Juliet Boulevard Roadway Association offers the attached letter supporting the proposed changes to the PUDZ and GMPA. If our understanding is incorrect, I trust we will be advised accordingly. Thank you for your consideration, and if you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. AICP Senior Transportation Planner Mobile: 239 207-9431 Jeff. Perry@stantec.com Stantec 5801 Pelican Bay Boulevard Suite 300 Naples FL 34108-2709 ® Stantec The content of this email is the confidential property of Stantec and should not be copied, modified, retransmitted, or used for any purpose except with Stantec's written authorization. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete all copies and notify us immediately. Packet Pg. 56 9.A.c JULIET BOULEVARD ROADWAY ASSOCIATION, INC. GASPAR STATION OWNER'S ASSOCIATION, INC. A. GROVER MATHENEY, TRUSTEE August 17, 2021 Ms. Josephine Medina Principal Planner Josephin.Medina@colliercountyfl.gov Ms. Michele Mosca Principal Planner Michele.Mosca@colliercountvfl.gov Ref: PL20190001600 Blue Coral Apartments PUDZ Dear Ms. Medina and Ms. Mosca: As the original/current developer of Gaspar Station Gaspar Station PUD, I would like to take this opportunity to address the proposed changes to the transportation commitments of the Blue Coral Apartments PUDZ (and companion Growth Management Plan Amendment). As previously referenced in my letter dated June 10, 2021, we objected to the provisions in the PUD and GMPA that required the interconnection of the Blue Coral Apartment project though the Germain parcel to connect to Useppa Way, a private roadway within the Gaspar Station PUD. On behalf of the Gaspar Station Owner's Association and the Juliet Boulevard Roadway Association, I am writing to express my support for the proposed changes to Exhibit F — Transportation, commitment number 2 in the proposed Blue Coral PUD rezone document, and to Section 23. Immokalee Road Interchange Residential Infill Subdistrict, paragraph "h." in the related Growth Management Plan Amendment, that would eliminate the requirement to construct a road across the Germain PUD tying into Useppa Way. My understanding is the PUD/GMPA language as revised would continue to allow for such interconnection at the discretion and approval of all the neighboring properties to the east, including those within Gaspar Station PUD. Additionally, the PUD transportation commitment as revised (Exhibit F - Transportation commitment number 2) would be consistent with the associated PUD Master Plan (Exhibit D) which has consistently highlighted this potential interconnection into/through the Germain PUD as "subject to neighbor approval". I urge Collier County Planning and Transportation Staff, and the Collier County Planning Commission to support the revised Transportation No. 2 commitment from the Blue Coral Apartments PUDZ document, and any similar Growth Management Plan language. Sincerely, A. Grover Matheney, Trustee Packet Pg. 57 May 20, 2021 TRANSCRIPT OF THE MEETING OF THE COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION Naples, Florida May 20, 2021 LET IT BE REMEMBERED, that the Collier County Planning Commission, in and for the County of Collier, having conducted business herein, met on this date at 9:00 a.m., in REGULAR SESSION in Building "F" of the Government Complex, East Naples, Florida, with the following members present: Edwin Fryer, Chairman Karen Homiak, Vice Chair Karl Fry Paul Shea Robert L. Klucik, Jr. (attended remotely) Tom Eastman, Collier County School Board Representative ABSENT: Joe Schmitt Christopher T. Vernon ALSO PRESENT: Raymond V. Bellows, Zoning Manager Jeffrey Klatzkow, County Attorney Heidi Ashton-Cicko, Managing Assistant County Attorney Page 1 of 80 May 20, 2021 CHAIRMAN FRYER: If not, all those in favor, please say aye. COMMISSIONER SHEA: Aye. COMMISSIONER FRY: Aye. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Aye. COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: Aye. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Opposed? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: It passes unanimously. Thank you, applicant. THE COURT REPORTER: I didn't hear Commissioner Klucik. MR. BELLOWS: Is Mr. Klucik participating this afternoon? CHAIRMAN FRYER: Oh. Commissioner Klucik, did you vote on that, sir? COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Aye. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Aye. Okay. It's unanimous. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. ***All right. The next two applications are companions under the heading of Blue Coral. And I'm not sure if it's Blue Coral or Coral Blue, so my first question is going to be, which do you want to be? Because I saw it both ways in the material. These are companion items. PL20190001620, the small-scale Growth Management Plan, and that's here for transmittal and adoption, and its companion PL20190001600, which is an RPUDZ. So, Mr. Wright, let me first ask, if there are any persons who are wishing to be heard in this matter, please rise and be sworn in by the court reporter. (The speakers were duly sworn and indicated in the affirmative.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: Disclosures from the Planning Commission starting with Mr. Eastman. MR. EASTMAN: No disclosures. COMMISSIONER SHEA: Staff materials only. COMMISSIONER FRY: Ditto. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Staff materials, meetings with staff, and communications with the applicant. COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: And I spoke to Mr. -- I spoke to Patrick, Greg, and Jeff. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Staff materials, staff meeting. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you, Commissioner. Mr. Wright, you have the floor. MR. WRIGHT: Good afternoon, Mr. Chairman, Commissioners. I'm Jeff Wright with the Henderson Franklin law firm here on behalf of the applicant. We have our team with us. With the applicant representative, Gregg Fusaro is here; Patrick Vanasse with RWA is our planner; we have Ciprian with Trebilcock; and Bethany Brosius with Passarella here today. We are here seeking your recommendation of approval of an application to rezone property from ag to residential PUD to allow the construction of an apartment complex with 280 units on 9.35 acres. The property is on the south side of Immokalee Road east of the Livingston Road intersection about 2,500 feet from I-75, and it's between commercial uses to the east, along with I-75, and residential uses to the west. There's a look at the situation of the adjacent properties. You see that Bermuda Palms, that's a residential development to the west, and Germain, the auto dealership, to the east. We have reviewed the staff reports, and we agree with their recommendations of approval. There's two staff reports, obviously, because we have companion items. Staff is recommending approval on both. We agree with them. We agree with all the conditions of approval that they've Page 53 of 80 May 20, 2021 proposed, and we're not proposing any deviations from the LDC. But as to the Growth Management Plan amendment, we do agree with staffs recommendation of approval, but there's one very important point of disagreement I want to highlight, and that's the density. Growth management staffs recommendation related to the density is 20 units an acre, and our project as proposed is 30 units an acre. So there's a delta there. Even though they're recommending approval, we are off on that number. So we have recently talked to staff today, and we're trying to reach a point that we can get an agreement with them on that density number. And one thing that came up today is, as proposed and as it's presented in the staff report right now, there would be 10 out of the 280 units devoted to low-income housing. We've since bumped that number up by 350 percent to 35 would be dedicated to low, 80 percent or below AMI. So we have 35 units that we're willing to commit to low, 80 percent or less, and 35 additional affordable units between 80 and 100 percent of AMI. So that is something that we just presented to staff today, and I wanted to make clear on the front end that the numbers that you see, we're willing to make a greater commitment than is maybe written in front of you today. CHAIRMAN FRYER: May I ask you to repeat the second 35? MR. WRIGHT: Yes, sir. The second 35 would be that AMI between 80 percent and 100 percent of AMI. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you. MR. WRIGHT: So together, 35 plus 35 is 70. That's a quarter of the project with a firm commitment to affordable, less than 100 percent of the AMI. Now, staff -- right now there's an LDC amendment going through relating to density in interchange activity centers, and this is very close to an activity center, and Patrick will get into some of that. But it's literally one parcel away from the activity center. So the new LDC amendments that are coming through would allow for 25 units per acre. Like I said, we're looking for 30; staffs saying 20. We feel like being so close to this activity center is a real plus for us because there's an LDC amendment in the works to change the number to 25 there. And, obviously, it's --there's some hoops you have to jump through to get that maximum number. But that's kind of what's guiding us. Really important, we feel that the unique location of the project -- it's close to I-75. There's a smooth -- what we're proposing is a smooth graduation of intensity as you go from the residential to the intersection of 1-75. So we have, as you can see from this picture, apartments, residential to west and commercial to the east. And as you got closer to the highway it gets more intense, and as you get farther away from the highway, as we're proposing it, it would get less intense. And we would be, essentially, the buffer between Germain, the commercial, and the existing residential. The property right now is vacant. And it's always possible that somebody could come in there and put commercial. We feel like our project is more compatible with the neighbors, particularly to the west where there's residential. And we always hear about the demand for housing, and the market's been crazy over the last year or so, as we all know. We feel like this project meets a critical demand for housing. We've heard Naples and Collier County say that a lot of their employees get on the highway and move up to Lee County or live in Lee County because they can't afford to live here. So this does meet a critical demand for housing, a commitment to affordable housing, and we'll put housing within reach for essential services personnel. We also have a commitment for all of those 70 affordable units to be offered to essential services personnel, put the housing within reach for lower income residents, and will allow Collier workers to stay in Collier. As I mentioned, I have Patrick and our team with me today. Patrick's going to focus on the planning considerations. And I'll turn it over to him next. We also have Bethany Brosius for our environmental issues; Ciprian with traffic; and Gregg, our project manager, is here to address Page 54 of 80 May 20, 2021 the project itself and economics, if that does come up and if there are any questions in relation to that. We appreciate the opportunity to be here, and I'll -- at this point I'll turn it over to Patrick. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you. Questions for Mr. Wright. Commissioner Shea first. Sorry. COMMISSIONER SHEA: Just -- I'm looking at, what is the density of the Bermuda Palms? MR. WRIGHT: Between 10 and 11 units per acre. COMMISSIONER SHEA: And what's the density of Windsong Apartments? MR. WRIGHT: We have this all on a chart. 16.8 for Bermuda Palms. MR. VANASSE: Windsong. MR. WRIGHT: Windsong, excuse me, 16.8, sir. COMMISSIONER SHEA: So you're not really transitioning to a higher density back towards the activity center. You're actually reversing it. You're going to a higher density as you move away from the activity center. MR. WRIGHT: Well, there's no residential up to where we're proposing. So the idea there was it's commercial -- the highway, you have a bunch of commercial, and then you have us, and then you have those two residential to the west of us. If that answers your question. COMMISSIONER SHEA: I think it's more of an observation. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Commissioner Fry. COMMISSIONER FRY: So did staff concur with 25 as a compromise, or where are you at with that discussion? MR. WRIGHT: Well, I'm encouraged by how it went, but I don't want to speak for them. I think there's probably a pretty good chance, if we're willing to put that commitment in writing, that they would be willing to change their number, but I don't want speak for them -- Michele to make that call. COMMISSIONER FRY: The justification for 30 units or 25 is what? MR. WRIGHT: Well, originally -- COMMISSIONER FRY: The affordable housing, is that -- MR. WRIGHT: Pretty much. You know, we could say it's good planning and the graduation of uses, but the bottom line here -- and we've heard this before -- that in order to get an increased density, you've got to give up something. You've got to provide a public benefit. And so what we did, between yesterday and today, is we focused specifically on that public benefit we were looking to provide, and we fattened it up, and hopefully that will be enough to make staff and the commission pleased with our project. COMMISSIONER FRY: What if you only got approval for 20 or 25 units, what would that do to your affordable housing commitment? Would it still be 25 percent of the total units? Is that the idea? MR. WRIGHT: Well, we're willing to, you know, work within this process as it goes along. For example, if you just recommended approval at 20, we would probably --we would probably move forward with that and continue to seek a higher number, but really, in order to make the project economics work, we've really tweaked all the numbers in the different categories of AMI to make it work. It's pretty close and we don't -- 20 -- 20 won't work. Thirty is the number that everything that we've done for the last two years has been based on, and 30 is the number that our affordable commitment is based on. So unless we have some sort of a major change, that's really what we're looking to do, 30. If you were to recommend approval of 25, we would move straight ahead, and we would be very happy to get your recommendation of approval in any event. COMMISSIONER FRY: Thank you. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Mr. Wright, there's a 30-day provision that would be offered to Page 55 of 80 May 20, 2021 the certain categories of tenants. Would you be willing to consider 60? MR. WRIGHT: Is that the one where the essential services personnel are given the offer first? CHAIRMAN FRYER: Yes, yeah. MR. WRIGHT: I am -- I'd be willing to consider that. This is -- I want to pull up the specific language that they had in the staff recommendation. And this is just for your reference. I'm reading from Packet Page 1261 where it says there's an essential services personnel commitment, and it says in the event that no ESP rents available within 30 days of advertisement of its availability, then it's offered to non-ESPs. Is that the -- CHAIRMAN FRYER: That's the provision I'm talking about, yeah. MR. WRIGHT: And I'm not -- I'm going to ask Gregg real quick, if I may. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Go right ahead. MR. WRIGHT: It's not a showstopper, but we'd like to, you know, be able to advertise before we open to make sure that we get a jump on that if we are going to give a 60-day window. CHAIRMAN FRYER: What do the other members of the Planning Commission think about an increased period of time? COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: I think 60 days is kind of too long, when you're a rental, to wait. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Other thoughts? MR. EASTMAN: It's certainly appreciated by the school district, Mr. Chairman. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Could we -- could we close it out at 45 days? MR. WRIGHT: Yes. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Any objections from the Planning Commission? COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: No. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Okay. Thank you. Thank you. MR. VANASSE: Good afternoon. For the record, Patrick Vanasse with RWA. It's a pleasure to be hereto talk about this project with you. We're excited about this project for several reasons. One of the things is, it's providing a unique new offering to this market. They're providing rental apartments that are a very high quality, and the level of amenities that they're providing within this complex is above and beyond anything I've seen locally. And we have pictures of projects, one that they just finished building in Orlando, and you'll see the great pictures of the amenities that they do provide. So they're providing a high -quality property, but you've got a private market -rate developer coming forward and making a commitment, a solid commitment to provide true affordable housing. And what I mean by true affordable housing is a lot of the projects we see in Collier County when they're asking for additional density tend to be what we call gap or workforce housing, and those tend to be 100 percent of AMI or above. And what is being offered here is affordable housing that falls within the moderate and low categories. So, again, a private developer coming forward with no government subsidies and making that commitment. And, again, it's a very site specific Comp Plan amendment, very site specific rezone with a lot of detail. So this is not going to be speculative. We're not asking for multiple use. It's not going to change. We're only asking for multifamily rental units. So from that standpoint, we think it's a great project. We also think the location is an ideal location. And what I mean by that is if you look at that quadrant of this activity center, this is the last remaining 10 acres that are undeveloped or unentitled. And we know exactly what's in that area and what to expect. We know that next door to us on the east is going to be a Germain car dealership approved for up to 60 feet. We also know that you've got intense commercial activity where the Walmart center is. There's a hotel there. There's a self -storage there. And we are creating that transition between higher intensity Page 56 of 80 May 20, 2021 commercial and lower intensity residential. And, again, I don't think it's all that important that we look at the exact number of density. It's more of we've got an apartment use that fits really well between commercial and residential and creates that transition. And we've worked very hard to develop a site plan and to develop a building that creates the biggest setbacks that we can, that minimizes the massing and is at a scale and at an architectural look and feel that is in keeping with the area and fits well with the area. We're asking for a maximum of four stories. Staff has asked us to reduce the overall height, the actual height to 50 feet. When we started this project, we had no architects, we had no engineers that had actually looked at ground elevation, how much fill would be needed, how much of a box we would need to fit those four stories. We have done that in the last few months. We know that we can fit within the 50 feet, so we are pleased to say, yes, we can accept that condition. And also with regards to density, some of the comments that were made, the reason why we went from what we were initially offering to what we have offered now is we talked to staff and we talked to some of the Planning Commission members. We were asked to revisit that. The pro formas that the applicant put together were six months to a year old, and they were really looking more so at the construction costs escalating and what they could possibly do. But what they've done just in the last week is go back and look at other rental communities close by and what those rents were, and they've been amazed at how quickly the rents have gone up elsewhere at, you know, 10 to 15 percent increases. So what that does for them is the portion that is not affordable, that they're not setting aside for affordable, that's where they can make a nicer margin and then provide more affordable. But the only way the amount of affordable works is predicated on that 30 units per acre. Anything less than 30 units per acre makes it that they can provide less of that affordable. So that's why, even though staff is recommending 25 -- and we're very happy -- well, I'm not going to speak for them. I think -- I think we have support from them at 25, I will say -- we'd still like to pursue 30 because, again, the more we get on the density, the more affordable we can provide, and there's a direct relation there. So that is -- that is why we're going to keep asking for the 30, and we think there's some enormous benefits from quality of project and also the affordable housing component. And as you'll see from the pictures, when we're talking about the quality of project, I would like to talk about the project a little bit. So it's luxury apartments. They're going to very well-appointed units, highly amenitized, parking garage on site. They are targeting young professionals and empty nesters. The units tend to be smaller units but of a much higher quality so they can still get the rents that they would like, but it's a smaller envelope, and it allows them also to keep their buildings at a scale that is appropriate for the area where they can keep the buildings a little smaller. We think it's a great location. And when we started this, the intent was to try to look at what the ULI housing study had put forward and to develop a project that was consistent with some of those recommendations. And the ULI study talks about finding appropriate places along major thoroughfares, activity centers. So these -- we're just outside an existing interchange activity center. So if we look at landscape -wide for Collier County, those nodes are the nodes that we've identified as the areas where we see the highest intensities and densities in the county. The infrastructure's there, the roadway system is there, and we've identified those areas as mixed use. So people that buy there or live there know that these are mixed -use activity centers. Higher intensity, higher density is expected. So we think that's a great location. It's right by 1-75, provides easy access for Southwest Florida, and we believe that location, again, with this idea that we're an infill project in an area Page 57 of 80 May 20, 2021 where we know exactly what the uses are around, it makes it where it's a great location. So some of the GMP amendments and LDC amendments related to housing affordability that are going to be coming forward, staff has taken some of the ULI recommendations. And ULI was recommending possibly up to 30 units per acre, and the ULI folks have seen this in resort communities throughout the U.S. that, yes, you need higher densities for market -rate developers to be willing to build and offer affordable housing. So those experts provided 30. The recommendation right now that staff is putting forward is 25. But the 25 would apply to all activity centers throughout the county, and some activity centers may have more residential, a little less diversity when it comes to commercial, maybe a little less intensity. This one is a major interchange. We know exactly what's there. So while 25 units per acre in some places might be more appropriate, we think that this one, knowing exactly what those uses are and what the compatibility issues are, I think it's an appropriate place for 30 units per acre. And the other thing is, as you went through your hearing this morning about the rural fringe, these amendments sometimes take a very long time to be heard and get approved. You have someone today willing to make that commitment. So moving on, I'll talk about compatibility issues. I'll try to keep it brief. I know that our biggest issue here is density. But I do want to touch upon the design and the compatibility concerns. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Go right ahead. MR. VANASSE: So as I said, when it comes to the quality and the luxury, these were renderings that were in the application when we started the project. You'll see we have pictures of the actual built project in Lake Mary outside of Orlando, and the final product is even better than the renderings are. But this is a level of amenity, as you can see, dog park, high -quality finishes in the units, internal/external recreation, gyms, that type of activity. This just touches upon the ULI study. And one of the things that I want to point out is when it comes to housing affordability, ULI makes a very important point that transportation combined with price of housing is crucial. And you've all heard about driving to qualify, that type of thing. So being in a good area close to transit is very important. Walmart has a transit stop. The regional park, very close by, has another big transit spot right there. So we have shopping, we have services, we have recreation, we have all the amenities close by, which will promote walkability and transit use. This was the initial commitment. As Jeff mentioned, we are upping this, and the full 70 units would be in the affordable category. That talks about the unique location that we have. Again, infill project, very site specific. This does not set a precedent for other properties throughout the county. Another important issue that we are proposing is when it comes to transportation, we've done our TIS, we have no significant impact on the adjacent roadway system. But what we've done is we've teamed up with Germain next door, and we're providing one access point for both projects, limiting the curb cuts and access points along Immokalee, creating a safer configuration having one turn lane for both projects, that type of thing. One thing that I'd like to point out also is the folks at Bermuda Palms, we're showing a potential interconnection. That's completely up to them if they want that connection or not. We think it could be a benefit to the residents because we're going to have a frontage road leading to Juliet Street [sic] and leading to the commercial activity center there so they wouldn't have to go back onto Immokalee to just go for errands, or when it comes to going west, they could go straight to Juliet Street where it's a signalized intersection to get to Immokalee and go west. So we think it's a great benefit. One thing that we hadn't committed to in our writeup or our application initially, and it's a Page 58 of 80 May 20, 2021 no brainer for us, is that if they want to connect, we'll make -- they can make that a gated access point, and it can be one way. So none of our traffic would use their entrance, but they could completely go through our project and use that frontage road all the way to the Walmart Super Center, for example. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Mr. Vanasse, do you know how far along Germain is? Have they broken ground? MR. VANASSE: I drive by it. The only thing I can tell you is I haven't seen anything driving by. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Okay. Thank you. MR. VANASSE: Next slide shows that frontage road. So as you can see in blue, the gray area is our subject property showing the building footprint, and that frontage road crosses our property, crosses the future Germain auto dealer, connects to Useppa and goes to Juliet Street. Juliet is where the signalized intersection is. So not only is that going to create a better configuration for traffic, but it's also going to promote bike/ped activity. All these folks, once they come home, if they need to run a quick errand or if they want to go to Seed to Table to have a drink and have dinner, they can easily walk there or bike there. Again, I think that's a great benefit to our transportation system. We promote that, but we see very little of that in Collier County. And, again, you're seeing private developers willing to do the right thing and commit to this. COMMISSIONER FRY: Patrick, can you leave that slide up for a second. A couple questions. MR. VANASSE: Sure. COMMISSIONER FRY: So the access road you're showing, looking at your property, you actually showed going up to Immokalee and then back down to connect to Germain, but you don't really have to do that, correct? MR. VANASSE: So our access point is right here, if you see my cursor. COMMISSIONER FRY: Yeah. MR. VANASSE: That's a joint access point. We're showing that should Bermuda Palms want to connect, this is their access point. They could connect through our project and make it all the way to Juliet Street. COMMISSIONER FRY: So they can -- where that line goes across your -- that line right there, that goes right ahead into Germain's property? MR. VANASSE: Yes. COMMISSIONER FRY: Okay. All right. That was Question No. 1. Question No. 2, is there a crosswalk at Livingston to go north across Immokalee Road to Seed to Table? You mentioned it's easy for them to get there, but that's six lanes plus -- MR. VANASSE: The easiest thing in my mind would be to cross at Juliet, go to the other side of the road. COMMISSIONER FRY: Then walk back? MR. VANASSE: Then walk along the northern side along the canal. I'm not exactly sure what the crosswalk configuration is there. Maybe transportation staff would know, or Ciprian. There's a -- so Ciprian, who's our transportation consultant, will answer the question. I think he's saying there is a crosswalk. MR. MALAESCU: Good afternoon. Ciprian Malaescu, Trebilcock Consulting Solutions. There is a crosswalk -- COMMISSIONER FRY: Can you speak into the microphone? MR. MALAESCU: I'm sorry. There's a crosswalk over there. It's a signal at Livingston and Immokalee Road, signalized intersection. Page 59 of 80 May 20, 2021 CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you. COMMISSIONER FRY: Thank you. CHAIRMAN FRYER: What was your name again, sir? MR. MALAESCU: Ciprian Malaescu. MR. VANASSE: So he works with Norm Trebilcock. Norm, unfortunately, this week is out of the area. So Ciprian has decided to chip in and help us out, and if you've got some more transportation questions, he can address those. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you very much. MR. MALAESCU: Thank you. MR. VANASSE: So when it comes to density, again, I think, you know, I made it clear that it's crucial for the provision of affordable housing and also to provide the quality project that they want to provide. But when it comes to density -- and as planners we talk about this all the time -- that people react to form, and what I mean by that is how buildings look, the scale, the aesthetics, and they don't necessarily react to numbers. So if you tell someone 16 units per acre or 20 or 30 units per acre, it's such a nebulous term that people have trouble understanding what that means. And every project is a little different. So sometimes you're going to get a little more open space or you're going to get a little more landscaping, and people are really swayed by the aesthetics and the feel and how it looks. So there's a lot of things that we can do to make a project compatible and to basically mitigate for our density and our intensity of use. So, obviously, the aesthetics are important, the massing is important, and what we've done with this building -- and I've got an exhibit showing that -- is we've broken up the building where it faces Bermuda Palms creating courtyards so they don't see one big, massive building. They see just kind of the ends of some of the wings, and they see a lot more landscaping, a lot more courtyard, greenery, and the recreational areas. We've also enhanced the buffer. So where we abut residential, we enhanced the buffer along Bermuda Palms. And where we abut Livingston Lakes on our backside, that's where we've located our preserve, and that's 100 feet -- 150 feet wide plus or minus, which creates a significant buffer. So the setbacks, the buffering, the aesthetics are all things that we really considered, and I'll go into that with some exhibits. And then the other thing was, I've got this slide kind of showing that, you know, we've got higher -density projects in Collier County. We don't have a ton of them, but we have them. And typically those higher -density projects are from existing larger planned -- PUDs where there was some density left over and they clustered it, and they typically clustered it along a major thoroughfare, and that came on the tail end of the project. But what I've got here is pictures of Orchid Run. It's been an extremely successful project. This is the --it's a residential rental multifamily project that I believe, from the applicant's research, has probability the highest rents right now in Collier County, and it's higher density, it's clustered density that was part of the PUD, and it's very attractive and very popular. But we've got other examples. Bayfront, Naples Square, Magnolia Square, Addie's Corner, and Mooring Parks at Grey Oaks. And I know that Mooring Parks at Grey Oaks is assisted living mostly, so that's a bit of a different animal. But I'm sure you've all driven by it. With the right landscaping and the right architecture, it's a great looking project, and it's a benefit to this community. So this is what I meant by the massing and where we've located the building. So as you can see, we put the majority of the building as close as we could to our eastern boundary, really, where that's where the commercial use is and the more intense use, to provide separation, as much separation as we could to the residential. And then we've broken up the building where we provide courtyards, and there in the Page 60 of 80 May 20, 2021 middle is a parking garage, and the parking garage is going to be lower than the rest of the building. The parking garage is going to be three stories. The rest of the building is four stories. So we've very carefully designed this, and we provided those enhanced buffers. And just to give you some examples here, with the current LDC, I believe that required buffers between industrial and residential use with straight zoning is 50-foot setbacks. And on here, I think the closest we have from a separation to a residential building is 190 feet. And our setback on our property, we have 80 feet. So they have some space on their side, and we have space on our side, but we far exceed any code requirements. And if you look where we abut Livingston Lakes, where our preserve is on the backside, we have over 270 feet to the closest residence. So we've put a lot of care into making this compatible. And as staff indicated in their staff report, they feel that from a compatibility standpoint we're pretty much there. They just wanted to reduce the height, and we've agreed to that. We can reduce the height. So from that standpoint, we think we have staff support from a compatibility standpoint. We've gone through great efforts to make it compatible from a design standpoint. So we think it's in keeping with the area. It's not going to impact the neighbors. And the 30 units per acre, again, being 25 units per acre or being 30 units per acre is not going to change the way the building looks or how it feels. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Commissioner Fry. COMMISSIONER FRY: Patrick, I can appreciate the U-shaped buildings and what impact that -- how that minimizes impact to the Bermuda Palms people. Can you go back one slide? MR. VANASSE: Yep. COMMISSIONER FRY: In the center you mentioned it's a parking garage. I mean, either that's the top level of a parking garage, or that is a parking lot. It looks to me like it's a parking lot. MR. VANASSE: It's the top level. COMMISSIONER FRY: That's the top level. So that's actually a solid building there. So they do see a solid structure throughout the entire center of that -- of your development. Do you have elevations showing what they would see from there? MR. VANASSE: Not from that side. We do -- I believe I may have had. In your packet -- I don't have it as a slide, but in your packet, we have a rendering that was taken from this Lake Mary project that has a parking garage as part of it. So in that packet -- and I think I put a note on there that that would be subject to change, and the design would be slightly different for this project. But that rendering kind of gives you a bit of a feel of what that parking garage would look like. So -- and I'm not going to belabor this. I can go back to any of those line -of -sights exhibits. But we looked at the massing and the size of our project versus other projects, the separation, the distance. Again, I think from amassing standpoint, we fit in very well. We create a good transition. The only thing to point out is adjacent to us on the eastern side, we have vegetation here. That's going to be that auto dealership at 60 feet. So -- and we dropped down to 50. And then from a line -of -sight, this is from Livingston Lakes. What this line -of -sight rendering shows you is that they should just see our preserve and not see our building on the other side. This is from Carlton Lakes across Immokalee. Closest homes are at about 630 feet, I believe, away. Again, very long distance. They're going to see a lot of roadway, median landscaping, and they might get a glimpse of our top -- the top of our project. And keep in mind, all those renderings were done at maximum 60-foot actual height, which, again, that's going to be Page 61 of 80 May 20, 2021 brought down to 50 feet. And this, the closest folks to us is Bermuda Palms, and this is a rendering from Bermuda Palms. Again, as I mentioned, we kept as much separation as we could from them. We're providing that enhanced buffer. We talked to staff about looking at existing vegetation along the boundary and trying to save some of the mature trees that are there. That's certainly something we'll go back and look and talk to our environmental and engineering folks, but trying to keep as much of that mature vegetation as we can. I've got -- the two next slides are just associated with trip data but, basically, unless you've got questions, I'm just going to go real quickly through those. The TIS conclusion is we have no significant impact on the roadway system and that for most segments we actually have a de minimus impact and that our project will not negatively affect Immokalee in front of our project. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Anybody want to hear more about traffic? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: Okay. MR. VANASSE: So with that being said, I'll turn things over to the applicant. He will tell you a little bit about what their intent is, why they do this, what they have to contend with when it comes to cost and market demand, and he'll show you that great project in Orlando that I mentioned. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you very much. MR. FUSARO: Good afternoon. I know you guys have been here a long time. I appreciate the time. My name is Gregg Fusaro. I'm with Capital Investment Group. I'm a partner with the company. We're actually headquartered in Cincinnati, Ohio, but we've realized over the last few years that it's a lot nicer here in the winter. So that's why we've been actually focused on a lot of different developments in different Florida markets. I wanted to let you know a couple of things about us is that we are generally -- we build, we develop, we own and manage our assets. So, historically, we have been long-term holders of properties, and we manage everything that we build. So it's us. It's not -- we don't turn it over to a third party. We manage all of our assets. More recently, we have sold some properties just because the market has -- the markets have been just crazy. But historically, we put long-term debt on our properties, and we hold them for the long-term. I just wanted to point out a couple of things, I think, and that is that one of the exercises that we've been going through in the last few days related to affordability, and the reason that we're able to kind of upgrade the number of units that we can provide at a lower -- to lower median incomes is based on just kind of continually researching what's going on in the marketplace, and what's happening here is that because of the lack of supply, rental rates across the board, but particularly in the higher end, which almost everybody has to build today, those rates have gone up extreme -- I mean, I was shocked at how quickly they've gone up. And one of the ways to work with that supply -and -demand issue, if the supply continues to be limited, demand continues to go up, which is happening in this market, prices have to go up. If you add some more supply, it will have a mitigating effect on overall rental rates. We've seen that in Cincinnati in a big way, not necessarily for the good of folks like us who have properties and modeled certain rents, and we've seen those rents, you know, go up very quickly and then kind of tail back down as more and more product has come on the market. So in our urban core downtown, we had rents that, in some new projects three or four years ago, started out about $1.90 a square foot and ramped up to about 2.30 a square foot, and everybody thought, well, gee whiz, I can come in and do that, too, and get those rents. Well, the additional supply has actually pushed rents back down, and so that average now is around 2.05 a square foot, so it has mitigated because of the additional supply. Page 62 of 80 May 20, 2021 In terms of this site and this location, one of the reasons that it's -- it's great, not only for us but we feel for the neighborhood and the immediate market area, is because it does provide what we always look for, which is walkability. And it's not maybe the same as being right downtown on Fifth Avenue or something like that, but you've got walkability to the Strand, you've got walkability to the hotel, you've got walkability to the bank, to Seed to Table and, just as importantly for our residents, is the park that's right around the corner. And so, you know, those are the kinds of things that we look for in development sites and one of the reasons -- one of the reasons why we think this is a great site for this product. The other being that we do feel it's just a great transition from the car dealership to the residential to the west. And as Patrick said, we've tried to push everything away from the residential as much as possible. In terms of rental rates versus mortgage rates to our neighbors to the west, the rents at this development will be comparable or more than a mortgage payment would be today if you purchased one of the units in Bermuda Palms. So there's, I think, great compatibility there in terms of not only cost but the kind of resident that you'll have in the makeup of that neighborhood. But the walkability is very important to us. We also are pleasantly surprised at the -- while, again, we know we're adding traffic, the impact is minimal. And I think our team did a great job in working with the Germain group to provide one access point for both developments and to provide the service road through to Juliet, which is a big plus for our residents. So we're really excited about that. We believe that -- and where do we go here? So this is a project that we just finished in the Lake Mary area of Orlando, and I just wanted to show these to you because it's -- while no two projects that we do are identical, it conveys kind of the concept that we would envision here. This is a four-story building, all elevator served, and it does have a parking garage. This slide shows some of the interior finishes in the common areas, so all of our developments have very extensive common areas and really recreation opportunities for our residents. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Excuse me, sir. You said a parking garage is below ground? MR. FUSARO: No, no, no. I'll show you. This is an aboveground garage similar to what we would -- CHAIRMAN FRYER: This is four stories over parking? MR. FUSARO: No, no. This is four-story with an attached parking garage, excuse me. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Gotcha. Thank you. MR. FUSARO: I'm sorry. This just shows you some of the interior features that we try to incorporate into every development. The one on the left is our -- is part of the clubroom, pool table area. We have a fitness center, obviously, in every development that we do. This is one of the courtyards in that development with putting green, jacuzzi, swimming pool. Every property we do today has a pet spa, and generally we have a golf simulator room in every development, and we really encourage that interaction between residents on site. This just shows you the interiors of some of the units. They're condominium quality. Everything we do today is like that. And the summary, basically, I've already talked about. One thing I do want to make sure that I mention is this development has a two -level garage, not four or five. I think Patrick said three. It's actually just two levels; on grade and one level above that, and there's actually no roof on that building, so that will be open on the second floor. So it's not a three-story structure. It's actually one story above grade. COMMISSIONER FRY: So from Bermuda Palms as they look across at your development, they will see the ends of the U-shaped buildings, and then in between those two buildings they will see a two-story parking garage that fills kind of a central courtyard area. Page 63 of 80 May 20, 2021 MR. FUSARO: Correct, correct, yeah. So I appreciate your time. Happy to answer any questions if I can. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you, sir. No one has lit up on their deliberator. Therefore, seeing as it's 25 minutes after 2:00 -- well, before we recess, let me ask how many, if any, registered speakers do we have? MR. YOUNGBLOOD: Mr. Chairman, we have three registered speakers online. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Okay. Anybody in the room? MR. YOUNGBLOOD: No, sir. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Okay. And then, of course, we have staff. All right. So let's take a 14-minute break to 20 minutes of 3:00. We're in recess till 20 minutes of 3:00. (A brief recess was had from 2:26 p.m. to 2:41 p.m.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: Let's return to session. Mr. Wright, anything further from the applicant? MR. WRIGHT: No, sir. That concludes our presentation. CHAIRMAN FRYER: All right. MR. WRIGHT: We're here if there's questions. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Okay. Planning Commission, any questions for the applicant? It appears not. Thank you. All right. We'll hear from staff. Is this going to be Mr. Sabo? No. MS. MOSCA: Good afternoon, Mr. Chairman, Commissioners. For the record, Michele Mosca with Zoning Division staff. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you. COMMISSIONER FRY: You look familiar. MS. MOSCA: Maybe from this morning. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Maybe. MS. MOSCA: Okay. So before we start talking about the zoning petition, we're going to address the Comprehensive Plan amendment, and it is a small-scale, so this will be an adoption ordinance, so you won't have a second shot at this one. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Right. MS. MOSCA: So when Comprehensive Planning looks at a petition, we always ask, should this plan amendment be approved? Because without the plan amendment, you can't get the zoning. So just make sure everybody's aware of that. So there's always a lot of focus given to the zoning petition without a lot of discussion about the county's vision for the growth plan as well as its policies. So what are these policies? The first policy within the urban area, the vision and the plan is to allow a maximum density of up to 16 dwelling units per acre except in the mini -triangle area of the Gateway/Bayshore CRA. One area of the plan that allows 16 dwelling units per acre is the activity center, and you heard the applicant mention the activity center. Density provisions of the plan provide a transition, that is the higher densities in the activity center in intensities to the lower densities to be further removed from the activity center. The subject property is not within an activity center nor is the Germain Immokalee property to the east, which was subject to a recent Growth Management Plan amendment. The second policy, as mentioned by the applicant, is the proposed affordable housing initiatives. So you all haven't seen those initiatives yet, but those provisions will be reviewed by the Board, most likely reviewed by the Planning Commission. But those are to allow a maximum density of 25 dwelling units per acre, and these are specific provisions for affordable housing, a targeted type of development. I'm going to skip this slide. We know about the site conditions already from the applicant. So two areas of concern that Comp Planning staff has with this petition: Density as well Page 64 of 80 May 20, 2021 as compatibility. The eligible density under the existing plan provision is 16 dwelling units per acre. The base eligible density is four dwelling units per acre, and the eligible bonuses to target certain types of development, such as affordable housing, is available up to 16 dwelling units per acre. The subject property is requesting 30 dwelling units per acre. That's 14 more dwelling units per acre than what the plan allows currently. The density is out of character with the surrounding densities on adjacent properties, and you can tell in the slide; take a look around the surrounding areas. So as you can see from the activity center far over to the east, you see that the densities gradually go down. They go up a little bit by the -- I'm sorry -- the intersection of Livingston and Immokalee Road, and those all received eligible bonuses for either infill or affordable housing or residential density band, because that's the intention, to transition. So in the activity center, 16 dwelling units per acre. As you go further out, there's that opportunity for the residential density band of up to three additional dwelling units per acre. So the project is requesting a higher density than what is being proposed by the affordable housing amendments that you'll see in the future. It does not provide the number and type of affordable units identified in those affordable housing provisions. The second area of concern is compatibility. And the applicant has done a significant --tremendous job to address compatibility with adjacent properties. They have done that. Comprehensive Planning staff typically defers the compatibility analysis and review to Zoning staff so they can review the project in its entirety. But what I've provided here is Future Land Use Element Policy 5.6. And, again, this is a Comprehensive Plan amendment. This is not a project that can come in today and request the 30 dwelling units per acre. So what we look for is that any new land uses be compatible and complementary to the surrounding land use. The evaluation typically looks at the building location, orientation, height, buffering, and other factors to determine compatibility. So I'm going to show you the different heights in the area. So to the west is a 34-foot two-story building; to the south they're 35-feet two-story buildings; to the west, that's the undeveloped Germain Immokalee project, and that's 55 to 60 feet; and then to the north, 35 feet, two-story buildings. Now, I want to state that the applicant has provided a greater buffer than required on the western side, I believe also on the southern side, which goes a long way to addressing compatibility; however, we do recommend that the Type B buffer that they're proposing, that perhaps maybe they can add enhanced buffering, maybe some mature trees or retain the trees that are in that area presently. Additionally, perhaps enhanced building perimeter plantings to soften the look of the garage structure as well as the building itself. COMMISSIONER SHEA: Can we ask a question on that last slide? MS. MOSCA: Sure. COMMISSIONER SHEA: Where is Germain's at 55 to 60 feet? It seems like that would be pretty compatible with what they're asking for. MS. MOSCA: Right. And, typically -- and typically we would require a transition downward. Maybe that got in under the radar; I don't know. But typically we would have suggested a lower height, and perhaps they won't come in at 55 feet, 60 feet. I'm not sure what they've developed in the past for, you know, the heights. CHAIRMAN FRYER: That came before us, and we granted it. COMMISSIONER SHEA: What's that? We did? CHAIRMAN FRYER: Yes. COMMISSIONER SHEA: These are actual heights, right? We're not getting into the Page 65 of 80 May 20, 2021 zoned height? MS. MOSCA: No, those are actual heights. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Sixty is actual. COMMISSIONER SHEA: Actual. MS. MOSCA: Right. For the surrounding properties, those are the actual heights of those two-story buildings. So I just wanted to address the project justification. So the applicant's justification for the 30 dwelling units per acre were the commitments for essential service personnel. And, again, the discussion staff had with the applicant during the lunch hour, they go a long way to addressing the affordability portion. So now they've increased the 35 rent -restricted to 70 for ESP, as they mentioned. So 35 of the units will be 80 percent and lower, and 35 units will be greater than 80 percent to 100 of the AMI. And for those of you who are not aware of the 2021 AMI, that's 84,300. So just to keep that in perspective. So the proposals under the affordable housing amendments, those are the initiatives that the applicant has talked about, the initiatives that I spoke about earlier. Initiative 3, which is affordable housing in the activity center, that requires two-thirds of the bonus, so that's two-thirds of the bonus between 16 and 25 would be the proposal to be available to low and very low income. Now, they haven't proposed any low income in this project. That would mean 88 out of the 280 units would need to be affordable. Initiative 5, which increases density along transit routes, again, requires two-thirds of the bonus, and in this case above 13 dwelling units to be available to low and very low. Again, the project is not proposing any very low. And that would require 106 of the 280 units. So let's talk about some of the density that they believe is comparable to the other projects. So we take a look at the pictures. There's three examples here that the density is not comparable, and context is different. So we'll look at -- first we'll look at -- the top right corner is Magnolia Square. It's at Goodlette-Frank Road. This is actually -- and I believe Patrick had mentioned this. This is part of a larger Planned Unit Development, although the density itself, the 10.5 acres, roughly 290 units at, again, roughly 30 DUs per acre. But this is a very different project. This project is in a mixed -use development. So surrounding it are commercial. To the north, there's office buildings, to the east, industrial, and the school and some additional retail, and then across Goodlette-Frank Road to the west, Pine Ridge Road Estates, and those are hundreds of feet away. So just a different context to keep in mind. The Orchid Run development, which Patrick mentioned, at Livingston Road and Golden Gate Parkway, both of those are six -lane divided highways. This piece is part of a larger Planned Unit Development, Grey Oaks, and it's an isolated piece. So there really isn't any additional residential around them. There is a golf course and some units further away. And this is at a density of 12.87 dwelling units per acre, roughly 21.91 acres. And then lastly is Addison Place. That's at Immokalee and Collier Boulevard. And, again, that's at 15 dwelling units per acre. The next item is demand for rentals units in the market. There is, based on their market study, a demand in the area. Additionally, within this same market area, you'll see another apartment complex coming forward, and this is at the corner of Goodlette-Frank Road and Immokalee Road, and they're asking for an approval of 30.3 dwelling units per acre. So the concern here would be this approval could be the new level of accepted density at 30 dwelling units per acre. So staff is recommending from the Comp Planning side that we reduce the density to 20 dwelling units per acre for a total of 187 dwelling units. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Did you say 20 or 25? Page 66 of 80 May 20, 2021 MS. MOSCA: Twenty. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Twenty. MS. MOSCA: I'll touch on that in a moment. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Okay. MS. MOSCA: And then also reduce the building height in the PUD rezoning petition and require taller plantings in the Type B buffer along the western property line. Given all the information that we received at lunchtime, they are -- the applicant is getting closer to the initiatives that are being proposed by the Housing Department, and so staff would be able to support 25 even though it's not comparable to all of the requirements of those initiatives. So with that, I conclude, and I will have Josie talk about the zoning portion. MR. KLATZKOW: So we're basing our recommendation based on an LDC amendment that the Board hasn't approved yet? MS. MOSCA: Yes. But it's -- you know, it's consistent with the direction that we're moving forward with. So we can get to that level. Right now it's 16 dwelling units per acre, and staff could, in fact, justify the 20 because they were providing affordable housing, and they were making a commitment for 30 years. So that's why we were able to support 20. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you. MS. MOSCA: You're welcome. MS. MEDINA: Josephine Medina, principal planner with Zoning Division, for the record. So when staff is evaluating RPUD, residential -- or any PUD rezone, to echo what Michele was saying, we do evaluate FLUE Policy 5.6, development compatibility and complementary surrounding land uses. We also review LDC Section 10.02.081 for rezoning -- for our rezoning findings as well as for the PUD findings, LDC Section 10.02.15.13.5, which I'm sure you guys are aware of. So we evaluate this based on the maximum and minimum development standards that the -- and development commitments. This evaluation, I guess I should have mentioned as well, was also based on the reduced -- the recommendation of reduced density to 20, when I was looking at the compatibility extent. So the main portion that -- the main property that would be affected is definitely, as mentioned, Bermuda Palms Condominiums. This is the one that we've also received 27 signed petitions in opposition as well as one letter requesting a reduction in density. So if we look at the property itself, what the developer is proposing is 80 feet setback from their property line as well as a 15-foot-wide Type B buffer which, as they mentioned, is enhanced because the LDC would require only a 10-foot Type A buffer. And we are also looking at the 35-foot two-story building right hereto the right. If you look to the left, then you would see what you -- from the second story, what Bermuda Palms actually is looking towards. Right now, obviously the undeveloped property, I believe the agent said that the trees about -- are about 65 feet tall. And this is an estimate, so it obviously might not be the exact height. But I just wanted to get you an idea of what they would be looking at. COMMISSIONER FRY: If the building is 50 feet tall, as we discussed, and these trees are 65, are you saying that the Bermuda Palms people would not see? MS. MEDINA: Well, these trees are what are existing on the undeveloped. COMMISSIONER FRY: Oh. So those are coming down, replaced with a Type B buffer? MS. MEDINA: I guess it would depend on what's exotic, what's not, and if they're willing or able to save. COMMISSIONER FRY: Okay. MS. MEDINA: So it's really not -- I wouldn't be able to say. But just kind of a feel, because since it hasn't been built, I can't really say. Page 67 of 80 May 20, 2021 And to the north, Carlton Lakes -- Carlton Lakes. Minimum 150-foot setback from Immokalee Road is what's being proposed, LDC required Type B buffer. The amount of impact, especially with the reduced height, I don't think it would be as much. Like I said, mostly what we're seeing and how the site is located with it being long, it would definitely be more towards the west where you're seeing the majority of the impact. To the south, as you can see, this is what's, again, existing. There is a commitment to 1.18 acres designated along the southern side of this. And so if you can see, these are two-story -- I believe they're condominiums on the south. Depending on what happens with the amount of exotics that are there in the preserve, we don't see much of an impact also with the degree of -- I believe they said about 150-foot setback. I don't see much of an impact as well. They are required -- they can use the preserve as their landscape buffer, but it if there are a degree of exotics that are found, they do also have to meet the LDC requirements to beef that up a little bit. And, Commissioner Fryer, to answer your question about where Germain Immokalee is right now, right now the last -- I think Tuesday they had a pre-app for SDP. We didn't learn much from that, so that's where we are. So this is why I'm showing you what was approved in the ordinance as their master plan so you can kind of get an idea. Proposed setback from Immokalee -- from Germain Immokalee is that 25-foot setback and the required Type B 15-foot-wide buffer and, again, that ingress and ability to access Juliet through the site. And to address the why we went to -- requested a reduction in height, so staff reviewed the surrounding heights just to get an idea of what the impacts would be. So I think Michele went over this, two-story, 35 to the north; 30 feet, two-story Windsong; and then Eboli (phonetic) -- or Bermuda Palms is 34 feet. There was an approval to the south, it could either be multifamily or an ALF. It was approved for a zoned -- for, I'm sorry, an actual height of -- and that's wrong right there, but an actual height of 47 feet and a zoned height of 40 feet. And then we have to the south two stories, 35 feet. And then Germain Immokalee 60 feet and 55 and we --as the applicant had said. The point was for this to be a transition, and usually transitions you don't go neck and neck. It's something where we want there to actually be a visual transition as you're going down the road, even for Carlton Lakes, something like that. So the other point I wanted to make is these are two-story structures but they're also divided into various buildings. So all of the multi -families we have around here are not just --and, yes, there has been some work to allow for the courtyards and the smaller parking garages, but there's still something to do with being able to divide a building and letting that light truly come in. So the areas of concern that staff had when reviewing the evaluation criteria were the proposed change that would seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas. That being said, the applicant did mention that it's a visual thing for density, but when you're living next to something, it's also more noise and more light. More people creates that. So I just wanted you to keep that in mind as well. So -- but they did really work on creating orientation where their setback was beyond what is permitted -- what is required for MF -- RMF-16, and their conceptual building envelope identified in the master plan definitely showed their concern with being able to break up the massing. They also identified the preserve location for that south -- southern portion to mitigate. They also had the buffer increase from a Type A to a Type B, which did mitigate to some extent. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Commissioner Fry. COMMISSIONER FRY: Yes. So are you saying that you have a concern about the massing of the building? It's really one -- you have the -- it's really one long, continuous building not with the parking garage in the middle. So from Bermuda Palms, you're seeing a long, massive building with no gaps in between, or am I -- am I missing something? Page 68 of 80 May 20, 2021 MS. MEDINA: I mean, yes, there is some concern with that, yes. COMMISSIONER FRY: Okay. MS. MEDINA: So -- and there was a request for a reduction to the actual -- maximum actual height to help with that. But, again, as density increases, you get more light; you get more activity happening. We were also -- I was also concerned with the request being out of scale for what the neighborhood needs. Again, it's surrounded by two-story multi -families to the north, south, and west. So a reduction to the maximum actual height would create more of an appropriate transition from the commercial to the east. So staff went ahead and did a whole bunch of field surveys. I wanted to get an idea of what the actual impact might be. There's not really something in the county where I could compare as much just because of how tight this site is. The best width l could find of comparability was Orchid Run. It's 351 feet wide, four stories, density of about 2.87 [sic] dwelling units per acre. Obviously not the same density. Also, they have different stories. So if you go towards Golden Gate Parkway, they actually have two-story buildings/apartments instead of the four-story over here. So also different context along major thoroughfares. They have a canal. They have industrial zoning over here. Livingston Road divides them from Estates zoning. They also have a golf course where the major impact really is. Another field study survey that was done was Addison Place Apartments. As you can see, again, a little bit more isolated, have more preserves and dry retention areas as well as to the south will be commercial. And it's a big -- bit wider site. It has less of -- it's divided into multiple buildings as well. And they do also have enhanced buffers along the eastern portion of it; Type B buffers that have been enhanced with more mature trees. They've also made them different widths, depending where it is. If it's the amenity center, they have increased the width to 20-foot or 20-foot-wide. So they have varying degrees of Type B buffers depending on what type of use is at the location. And they are at about 15 dwelling units per acre, 51 feet actual, and four stories. With that, staff recommends approval subject to the following: Reduction to the maximum actual building height to 50 feet, and a revision to the master plan -- and this is just a correction for cleanup -- to identify a 25-foot setback along the eastern property line as has been identified in the residential PUD development standards. Other than that, I guess, like Michele, since there were changes that might increase the density, staff does have some concern with the amount of light and noise that might come from the development with a higher density, so it's in agreement with Michele regarding her request for an enhanced buffer facing Bermuda Palms. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Commissioner Shea. COMMISSIONER SHEA: Those three examples you showed, do they do anything with affordable housing? MS. MEDINA: I do not believe so. I don't -- I didn't research that, to be honest. CHAIRMAN FRYER: What is staffs official recommendation with respect to dwelling units per acre? MS. MOSCA: I would defer to Michele. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Okay. MS. MOSCA: Again, Michele Mosca, for the record. It's really challenging for staff to go from 20 to 25 and then up to 30, again, with the proposal for the additional affordable housing at those lower levels. It's ultimately a Board policy decision, but staff could be supportive of the 25 dwelling units per acre if, in fact, they provide for the mature trees and the Type B buffer, just so you provide those safeguards and protections for the adjacent property to the west. Page 69 of 80 May 20, 2021 CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you. COMMISSIONER SHEA: And are you talking about if they do the 35 and 35 on the affordable? MS. MOSCA: Yes. Now, mind you, that second tier, 80 percent and below, likely you'll get 80 percent. So you may not see all the way down to the 50 percent. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Okay. COMMISSIONER FRY: At 187 -- oh, what would 25 units per acre be, then; 235 or so? MS. MOSCA: Is your math better than mine? COMMISSIONER FRY: Oh, I don't know. So we're now above 25 percent. We're now at 30 percent or so affordable units out of the total if we did 25; seventy units out. MS. MOSCA: Two eighty. COMMISSIONER FRY: Well, it's not 280 at 25 units. It would be 235 or so. MS. MOSCA: Yes. COMMISSIONER FRY: Okay. Is there a way to quantify the additional buffering request that you're making? Meaning Type -- you know, we have Type A, B, C, and D. You're talking about mature trees. Is that a -- is there a more tangible or quantifiable way of requesting the additional buffering? MS. MOSCA: Patrick has a good idea. Because, you know, we were just thinking mature trees. So at time of planting, Patrick is saying that they could provide for certain diameter, and I guess it would be. I'm sorry. MR. VANASSE: So in talking with -- CHAIRMAN FRYER: State your name, sir. MR. VANASSE: For the record, Patrick Vanasse. In talking with the applicant, I think his intentions are very good. He was saying, well, we could possibly tag existing trees and keep them there. Part of the complication is when we develop a site in Southwest Florida, most of the site has to be filled, and we have to put berms. So it makes it very difficult to preserve existing trees. What we can commit to -- and I'm not a landscape architect. But before we go to the Board of County Commissioners, we can have something very specific as to size of tree. So minimum planting height and minimum caliber, so how big around the tree would be. So that's not a problem. We'll get our landscape architect to give us some advice on that, and we can certainly have a solid commitment by the time we get to the Board. CHAIRMAN FRYER: All right. Thank you. Any other questions or comments? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: Anything else from staff? MS. MEDINA: Well -- and I'm not sure if this is -- just to make sure the commitment for the two-story parking garage and four-story principal building is also something that the applicant's willing to commit to. It is not on the development standards and was one of the letters that we received that there wasn't clarity in that from -- CHAIRMAN FRYER: Fifty feet and four stories, right? MS. MEDINA: Correct. CHAIRMAN FRYER: I believe that's what I heard them say. MR. WRIGHT: Mr. Chairman, again, Jeff Wright, for the record. I think Mr. Fusaro has a comment that he would like to make on that particular commitment. CHAIRMAN FRYER: By all means. MR. FUSARO: Thank you. For the record, Gregg Fusaro. So I guess from our perspective, if we can make 25 units per acre work, without giving you any detail, because I haven't really thought through it, but with the less units we can either reduce the height of part of the building or all of it. We can probably reduce the number of parking Page 70 of 80 May 20, 2021 spaces in a parking garage. Whether that means a whole level comes off, I don't know. But either way, the reduction in units from 30 to 25 gives us flexibility to create, I'll say, just a better outcome visually in terms of building height either for part of it or all of it, and as far as structured parking goes. And so we would do that, you know, whatever would work the best from a feasibility standpoint. But either way, it will be a reduction in mass. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you. COMMISSIONER FRY: Would you still commit to the 70 affordable units at 25 units per acre? MR. FUSARO: I haven't run those numbers, but I'll say, yes, we'll figure out a way to get it done. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Anything else? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: All right. Anything else from the applicant? MR. WRIGHT: Well, first of all, I want to thank staff, because they put in a lot of time and effort, and they have truly worked with us on this one. I don't think that our project presents a new level. We've set forth reasons why. It's a unique location and graduation of uses and also the ULI and Board of County Commissioners policy makers have kind of encouraged this type of density on these major arterial roadways that are near intersections. So we don't feel like that's a new level we're creating. One thing I owed you, Mr. Chairman, it is Blue Coral. I know that's clear now. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Blue Coral, not Coral Blue. MR. WRIGHT: Yes. We ran into a problem with addressing, because Coral is a very common way to name a development, but blue is not, surprisingly. And as far as the -- well, we agree with staff s conditions -- proposed conditions of approval, and thank you for your time. Here for any questions. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you. We'll hear from staff, unless there are questions -- not staff, public. COMMISSIONER FRY: One question, I think, for the applicant team is, with the reduction in units, we talked a little bit about massing and having one continuous building that entire length of the building. Is it -- do you think the reduction in units might allow a break between buildings to allow some light through? MR. FUSARO: Sure. I think we can look at that. The -- part of the concept initially was that those units that are kind of in the center, which gives you on the east side a continuous building face, would have direct access to the garage, but there may be a way to -- assuming that those were the units that we kind of got rid of, then we could look at a way to have the two buildings on the end kind of on the end of the barbell have direct access into the garage and maybe those units along the east side that are against the garage aren't there. COMMISSIONER FRY: I guess, putting myself in the shoes of Bermuda Palms people, I'm not sure whether they would prefer -- if that reduction in units allowed a reduction of a story from four to three, my opinion is they probably would prefer that over a break in the center of the structure. But do you have a -- do you have a sense of that from past experience and what they might appreciate most? MR. FUSARO: It's --yeah, that's a tough one. I think if we asked 10 people we'll get five one way and five the other. I think that probably what we ought to do is just go back and maybe look at a couple of different options and see what just works the best overall and achieves -- again, yes, based on the actual setback from that property, I don't think the four stories is really going to be an issue. I mean, that's a lot. But I think we can certainly look at both options, because it's a finite number of units that Page 71 of 80 May 20, 2021 we have to reduce. So the question is maybe -- I think one of you might have mentioned or somebody mentioned earlier a building that's maybe three stories with a four-story section, we're doing that on a development right now, or do you just try to take -- open up that center area so that you have a direct line of sight, and you're only looking at a story -and -a -half, really, that you have to look over to see, you know, further to the east. Now, you might be looking at Germain's building when you look through there. But that's a valid question, and I think we would go back and play around with a couple of different options. COMMISSIONER FRY: I think we have, what, three speakers virtually for this or am I -- CHAIRMAN FRYER: Three or four. COMMISSIONER FRY: Three or four virtual speakers, and I don't know what the neighborhood sentiment is yet. CHAIRMAN FRYER: I think we may hear. COMMISSIONER FRY: But I would think before the County Commission the more you can walk in with agreement with your neighbors in terms of the aesthetics of it and -- MR. FUSARO: And I did speak with the woman who's president of the HOA association the other day. We had a good conversation. I just wanted to clarify the issue with respect to us having access into Bermuda Palms, which we had -- we do not want or need, but I said if they wanted it, great, or some kind of, you know, situation there. And then somebody had indicated that they thought we were tapping into their private water system, which was misinformation that came from somewhere, and I assured her that we were not doing that. Thank you. COMMISSIONER FRY: Thank you. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you. Registered speakers. Who's first? MR. YOUNGBLOOD: Mr. Chairman, for Item 9A5 we have Mr. David Jordan. Mr. Jordan, are you with us, sir? (No response.) MR. YOUNGBLOOD: Mr. Jordan, if you could unmute yourself. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Maybe we come back to him. MR. YOUNGBLOOD: Yeah. For Item 9A6, we have two speakers. First one is Diane Daugherty followed by Charles Berry. Ms. Daugherty, are you with us. Can you unmute your microphone for us, please. (No response.) MR. YOUNGBLOOD: All right. We'll come back to Ms. Daugherty. Mr. Berry, are you with us, sir? MR. BERRY: I'm on. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Mr. Berry? MR. BERRY: Yes. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Please proceed, sir. You have five minutes. MR. BERRY: Thank you very much. I am a resident of Bermuda Palms, and I have several questions. I was curious as to the proposed breakdown between one-, two-, and three -bedroom units. And the reason for that question was that if we don't have an accurate headcount, how can you do an effective traffic study? May I go on to my second point? CHAIRMAN FRYER: Please. MR. BERRY: Is the developer -- and I think the question was answered. But is the developer using totally private funds, or does he have some subsidiary money coming from government that might support the low-income housing? And third question: The stated area is 9.35 acres. If they took away 15 percent of the Page 72 of 80 May 20, 2021 available land as proposed for use as buffering, this leaves them 7.9 acres. Does that really work into the dwelling -units -per -acre calculation? Fourth question is, there was no report from the school district, and I'm wondering if this ultimately has an effect on what we're doing here. And my fifth question, which is more a concern, is if this goes through with the acceptance of the ratios of low-income and essential service personnel housing, how does that get policed in the future? If this is a 30-year commitment, who's watching all of this? And my final comment is: I hear them suggesting that this development will provide a nice buffer between us and the commercial areas, and we think the green trees and the nine acres that are there now present a pretty nice buffer for us as it is. And that concludes my comments and my questions. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you, sir. We can get answers to those questions right now, and I think it's kind of a blend of staff and the petitioner. Question about the TIS calculation, let's start with that one. MR. MALAESCU: Good afternoon, again. My name is Ciprian. I'm with Trebilcock Consulting Solutions on behalf of Norm Trebilcock in support of the project. I think the question was if the TIS was based on the number of persons living on the project. We follow a national standard in ITE, Institute of Transportation Engineers. It's an accepted standard in Collier County. And we have data that show number of units. So the ITE does not have a headcount for a development. They do traffic surveys all over the country. In this particular case, multifamily, they have many studies, over 501 would say, for each time period they studied. So basic analysis -- basic traffic analysis is really based on the number of units for the development. That's all. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you. And that has always been a point of frustration for me, but you don't use persons per household when you're calculating; you use the ITE number. MR. MALAESCU: That is correct, but the data should be the same, because it refers to the number of units. It is covered in the ITE. So the number of units are the same. ITE covers the number. In our case, 280. So it's within the range of data that ITE has. So it really doesn't matter how many people are living there. CHAIRMAN FRYER: And I anticipated your answer. I was just pointing out that it's a point of frustration for me. COMMISSIONER SHEA: Well, as an engineer, I don't understand that. I mean, if you had 280 three -bedroom units, you're going to have a lot more traffic than 280 one -bedroom units. MR. MALAESCU: And there will be more traffic for -- COMMISSIONER SHEA: But your study won't reflect that. MR. MALAESCU: It will, absolutely. If it's one unit more, we'll have more traffic. COMMISSIONER SHEA: No -- yeah, but if they're both 280 and one is all one -bedroom and one's all three -bedroom, you're saying they're the same, and I don't agree with that whether it's -- CHAIRMAN FRYER: I don't think so. The IT associates a number of automobiles to the size of the unit. COMMISSIONER SHEA: When you say the "size," you mean the square footage or you mean the number of -- CHAIRMAN FRYER: Bedrooms. COMMISSIONER SHEA: Bedrooms. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Isn't that right? MR. MALAESCU: That's correct. COMMISSIONER FRY: So bedrooms are taken into account? MR. MALAESCU: Not in the ITE perspective, no. Page 73 of 80 May 20, 2021 COMMISSIONER FRY: But you just said -- MR. MALAESCU: It's based on the number of units -- it's based on the number of units. There's no difference between a one -bedroom or two -bedroom. They have their own. Maybe -- MR. VANASSE: For the record, Patrick Vanasse. I think from a non -transportation engineer's perspective, my understanding of ITE manuals is they do studies and they look at comparable projects, and they take averages. So the one thing that we have going for us in Collier County is their persons per household tends to be lower than a lot of places in the country, but it doesn't -- like I said, it's an average of multiple projects and multiple locations throughout the country. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Regardless of number of bedrooms? MR. VANASSE: Correct. MR. FUSARO: For the record, Gregg Fusaro. Let me clarify just to answer your question a little bit. Our unit breakdown is about 9 percent studios, 51 percent one -bedrooms, about 31 percent two -bedrooms, and just under 9 percent three -bedrooms. So we're 60 percent one -bedroom or less. So from a traffic perspective, actually, the traffic studies generally, based on this type of unit, proportion mix, don't do us any favors, because it shows more traffic generation than we actually generate. The other comment, just as a point of fact from the developments that we've done in the last three or four years, they're mostly like this. They're kind of an urban landscape development within the suburb -- you know, very kind of urbanized suburban environment. And I won't say that we don't have any, but we have very, very few school -aged children in our developments. And based on that, the traffic that we actually generate is significantly lower than their studies will show, because with fewer school age, you just have fewer trips; not going to the soccer field three times a day, you know, that kind of thing. There was a question with respect to the buffer that's there now, and we get that, but if not us, probably commercial development on that site, and that's, you know, why, from our perspective, this is a great transition from that more intense development to the residential. What was the other question? CHAIRMAN FRYER: The caller asked about a government subsidy. MR. FUSARO: Oh. No, I haven't -- nobody from Collier County has volunteered any dollars. No, we don't have any government subsidy. It's all conventionally financed. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Okay. Thanks. MR. FUSARO: Yes, sir. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Then the question about the reduction in acreage. You calculated it at seven acres and some change. MR. FUSARO: But I believe, and the staff may correct me, density's always calculated on total acreage. But I will point out that the 1.18-acre is a -- is required in the development, and that is a pretty substantial buffer between us and Livingston Lakes to the south, and that's a required untouched area. CHAIRMAN FRYER: And his final question, I believe, had to do with who polices. MR. FUSARO: So I don't know the answer to that 100 percent, but I believe there are reporting requirements for Collier County with the neighborhood housing folks. MR. KLATZKOW: Staff does. CHAIRMAN FRYER: County Attorney, thank you. MR. FUSARO: Thank you, sir. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Okay. COMMISSIONER FRY: Ned, may I ask a question? CHAIRMAN FRYER: Go right ahead. Page 74 of 80 May 20, 2021 COMMISSIONER FRY: When we were reviewing an apartment proposal for Courthouse Shadows, the developer said that they developed studio units in other areas but that they could not develop studio units in Collier County because they were too small; that Collier County had a minimum square -footage requirement per unit. And I just wondered, is that -- that was an issue for them, and that's why they weren't building studios. But we have studios proposed here. Is there any -- what is the minimum square footage of your units? MR. VANASSE: I'll have to pull that from my binder and the minimum size that we have identified. But with regards to PUDs, you have the flexibility of asking for a certain minimum size. So I don't know if that really applies to us, and I don't know the circumstances of that project. COMMISSIONER FRY: I hope not because, personally, I believe there are a lot of young professionals that would live in a studio in order to have affordability, especially in nice luxury units. So I hope it's not a limitation. I just brought it up because it was an issue on that other development. Maybe, Ray, you can talk to it. MR. BELLOWS: For the record, Ray Bellows. There were a couple sites in that area where they were proposing some studio. One was in a PUD that had existing larger unit developments, and they were opposed to the studio being part of that community, so that was an issue. There was an issue in Bayshore with another apartment -type complex where the residents there didn't want a studio associated with an affordable housing project as well. And I think there was one other one with court -- or, yeah, Courthouse, but I wasn't -- I'm not sure what the reasoning was on that case. COMMISSIONER FRY: Thank you. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Do we have any other public speakers? MR. YOUNGBLOOD: Mr. Chairman, we have one more speaker. We'll go back to Mr. David Jordan. Mr. Jordan, are you with us, sir? (No response.) MR. YOUNGBLOOD: I don't think Mr. Jordan is with us anymore. That concludes our speakers. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you very much. Does anyone object to us closing public comment? Well, I'll ask the applicant if he has a rebuttal. MR. VANASSE: Patrick Vanasse, for the record. Just to answer the question, our Development Standards Table does provide minimum floor area for a studio, we are at 450; for one -bedroom, 600 feet; and two -plus bedrooms, 750 square feet minimum. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you. COMMISSIONER FRY: As long as that's okay with the county, it's certainly fine with me. MR. BELLOWS: Yeah. The staff doesn't object. CHAIRMAN FRYER: All right. Closing public comment. It's now time for us to deliberate on this application. Who'd like to start? COMMISSIONER SHEA: Well, I guess at this point I could see moving forward with -- since we've come to an agreement, I think the affordable housing is always an appealable part of it for me, and the staff being willing to accept the higher density, I would recommend -- I would approve that modified application. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Is there a second? COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: Thirty or 25? Page 75 of 80 May 20, 2021 COMMISSIONER SHEA: I wasn't making -- I was just giving comments. I wasn't making -- COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: Oh. COMMISSIONER SHEA: I can if that's what you want. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Yeah, it would be nice, if you wouldn't mind. COMMISSIONER SHEA: Well, I propose that we accept the modified proposal that the staff has concurred with for the lower density and -- MR. BELLOWS: At 25? COMMISSIONER SHEA: I guess we don't need to address -- excuse me? MR. BELLOWS: At 25 units per acre? COMMISSIONER SHEA: At 25 units. And we don't have to address the percentages committed to on the affordable housing; is that something we have to put in it or -- CHAIRMAN FRYER: I think we do. COMMISSIONER SHEA: It's in the record, but... CHAIRMAN FRYER: It seems to me that these are the factors that we need to deal with: First of all, the number of units that will be offered for less than 80 percent of AMI; the number of units for 80 to 100 percent of AMI; then the DUAs; and the building height. I think those are the -- and the buffering. COMMISSIONER FRY: And the buffering. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Those are the four features that I think need to find their way into our -- COMMISSIONER FRY: It was 35 units at 80 percent and below; 35 units at 80 to 100. COMMISSIONER SHEA: Yes. MS. MOSCA: Thirty-five units below 80, and 35 units 80 to 100 percent. COMMISSIONER FRY: Twenty-five dwelling units per acre. MS. MOSCA: Twenty-five DUs per acre, yes. CHAIRMAN FRYER: And actual height of 50 feet. COMMISSIONER SHEA: Fifty feet. CHAIRMAN FRYER: And more dense -- B buffering plus more density. MS. MOSCA: Those would be mature trees, and we'll have to come up with some language. COMMISSIONER FRY: To be defined and presented to the BCC. MS. MOSCA: Yes, yes. COMMISSIONER FRY: Can we permit a little bit more discussion? CHAIRMAN FRYER: Of course. COMMISSIONER FRY: I feel like in a way -- and I think Jeff made a point -- that they have not approved these new development standards for the 25 units for affordable housing. We've said we've come a little bit short of what they were requesting as part of what they're considering; however, we have -- to your point, Mr. Vanasse, we have had -- most applications that have any affordable housing are that gap -- have been that gap. So here we are really in the city -- or in the main area of Collier County we have some really, you know, affordable moderate and low affordable housing. So I feel like in a way we're kicking the can down the road to the BCC to have them more or less confirm that intention of the 25 dwelling units per acre. Ray? MR. BELLOWS: Yeah. For the record, Ray Bellows. This is still a GMP amendment. So they're establishing the density through the GMP amendment. And I also want to clarify you were talking about lower the actual height, but we also want Page 76 of 80 May 20, 2021 to make sure we address the zoned height as well. And I think, Josie, do we have a reduced zoned height as well? CHAIRMAN FRYER: Forty-five, maybe? MS. MEDINA: Yeah. They were requesting 55. I'm not sure what -- CHAIRMAN FRYER: No, 50. MS. MEDINA: For the zoned height? CHAIRMAN FRYER: Fifty actual. MS. MEDINA: No. They were requesting 55 previously -- well, all right. Fifty is actual. Previously they were requesting 60 actual and 55 zoned is what I was saying. MR. BELLOWS: So do we want 45 zoned? CHAIRMAN FRYER: Fifty actual, 45 zoned. MR. VANASSE: Patrick Vanasse, for the record. We looked at both the actual height and the zoned height. Like I said, we had our engineers look at the fill requirements and where our finished floor would be. We also looked at the adjacent roadway for actual height; that's how it's measured what the height was and differential with us. What staff was suggesting to us was 50 zoned height and 50 actual height. And we can make it work within that envelope, but 45 zoned height, I don't know if we can -- if we can completely make it work at this time. That's not something we studied. We looked at 50 and 50 for zoned and actual, and we can live with that. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Does anyone object to 50 and 50? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: So that's what it is. Someone from staff, is there clarity on what our -- what we're about to vote on? MS. MEDINA: Yes, I believe so, because there is also, as far as when we're looking at the parking structure, should they desire to put something underneath, there is a note that I believe we will change as well to be two stories, and also, should they desire to put under -- parking underneath, then it would still be limited to that actual height of 50 -- CHAIRMAN FRYER: Absolutely, absolutely. MS. MEDINA: -- which we did address in one of the notes in the development standards. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you. COMMISSIONER FRY: I'd like to bring up one other issue just to put it on the table is the -- with the reduction in density, the possibility of reducing it from four stories to three stories, and I wondered how my fellow commissioners feel about that as a condition for approval. MR. KLATZKOW: No, you already approved 50 feet, right? COMMISSIONER SHEA: Yeah, I think the height -- CHAIRMAN FRYER: Let them do what they want within -- COMMISSIONER FRY: Let them do what they want with 50 feet? MR. KLATZKOW: What's the difference if it's three stories of 50 feet or four stories of 50 feet? COMMISSIONER FRY: That's a reasonable point. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Okay. Any further discussion? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: Last point I'd like to make, to compliment the applicant. This is, I think, a great proposal from the standpoint of affordability, and you're to be thanked and complimented. I think this is absolutely in line with what the Board of County Commissioners has been looking for. And so I'm delighted to be able to support this. So thank you very much. Any further comments? (No response.) Page 77 of 80 May 20, 2021 CHAIRMAN FRYER: If not, all those in favor, please say -- COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: Wait. We have to do the Growth Management Plan first. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Yeah, we'll do GMP first. On the Growth Management Plan -- COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: There's changes to it. MS. MOSCA: Yes, and I'm clear on the changes to the subdistrict text with the limitations that were already provided by the Commission. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Okay. Do you have clarity, Vice Chair? Do we have clarity? COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: I'm looking. So you're just changing the 30 to 25. Well, 25 percent won't be -- MS. MOSCA: So it's going to be 70 rent -restricted, and then we'll list the categories in the subdistrict text. So it will be 35 units less than 80 percent and then 35 units above 80 to 100 percent for the ESP. COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: Okay. CHAIRMAN FRYER: All right? Any further discussion? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: This is on the GMP. All in favor, please say aye. COMMISSIONER SHEA: Aye. COMMISSIONER FRY: Aye. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Aye. COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: Aye. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Opposed? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: It passes unanimously. Thank you. THE COURT REPORTER: I didn't hear Commissioner Klucik. CHAIRMAN FRYER: You didn't hear who? THE COURT REPORTER: Commissioner Klucik. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Oh, Commissioner Klucik, we didn't hear you vote. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Yes, I said "aye." CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you very much. All right. Is there a motion on the -- MS. MOSCA: Commissioner, I apologize. We -- actually, the number of days that the public notice ESP. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Oh, yeah. MS. MOSCA: That's also -- and I apologize. That's also within the subdistrict text of the Growth Management Plan amendment. So we need to address that going from 30 days to 45 days, which was recommended by the Commission. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Okay. Without objection, can that be part of the motion that we just passed? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: That's unanimously approved. MS. MOSCA: Thank you. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you. Now -- COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: I wouldn't think we would need a roll call on that. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Commissioner Klucik, will you please call the roll? COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Not a roll call, but a vote, you know. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Okay. All those in favor of the original motion and the conditions and then the additional condition with respect to 45 days, please say aye. COMMISSIONER SHEA: Aye. Page 78 of 80 May 20, 2021 COMMISSIONER FRY: Aye. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Aye. COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: Aye. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Aye. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Opposed? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: It passes unanimously. Thank you very much. Now, on the Land Development Code -- rather the PUD, may I have a motion on that? COMMISSIONER FRY: Move for approval subject to the conditions that have been discussed. COMMISSIONER SHEA: All the conditions that -- CHAIRMAN FRYER: Yeah. Is there a second? COMMISSIONER SHEA: Second. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Any further discussion? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: If not, all those in favor, please say aye. COMMISSIONER SHEA: Aye. COMMISSIONER FRY: Aye. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Aye. COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: Aye. COMMISSIONER KLUCIK: Aye. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Opposed? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FRYER: It passes unanimously. Thank you, applicant. MR. VANASSE: Thank you. CHAIRMAN FRYER: All right. COMMISSIONER FRY: I would just add, I think, I appreciate just the flexibility, kind of on -the -run, very fair, I think, responses from the applicant and flexibility and concessions while we were in the meeting. So I do wish it worked like this more often. MR. VANASSE: Well, thank you very much. I told you we had a good project. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Thank you very much. Thank you. Well done. Well done by all. Okay. That takes us to old business. I don't believe we have any. New business, one small matter. Let's discuss the need for a July 1st meeting. I've consulted with Ms. Jenkins, and she tells me there is nothing scheduled for that day. I think for our planning purposes, it would be nice if we could give ourselves a day off on July 1st. What's the wish of the Planning Commission? COMMISSIONER SHEA: Second that motion. COMMISSIONER FRY: Would that have been a formal normally scheduled meeting? CHAIRMAN FRYER: Yes. COMMISSIONER SHEA: Yes. CHAIRMAN FRYER: Yeah, anybody object to that? COMMISSIONER HOMIAK: No. CHAIRMAN FRYER: All right. Without objection, then -- unless a vote is demanded, without objection, we will cancel our July 1st meeting. Obviously, if emergencies come up, then we have to reconsider, but the record will show going forward that our July 1 meeting has been canceled. Any further business? Any public comment to come before the meeting before we Page 79 of 80 9.A.e ORDINANCE NO.2021 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 2004-41, AS AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, WHICH ESTABLISHED THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BY AMENDING THE APPROPRIATE ZONING ATLAS MAP OR MAPS BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY FROM AN AGRICULTURAL (A) ZONING DISTRICT TO A RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (RPUD) ZONING DISTRICT FOR THE PROJECT TO BE KNOWN AS BLUE CORAL APARTMENTS RPUD, TO ALLOW DEVELOPMENT OF UP TO 280 MULTI -FAMILY RENTAL UNITS, OF WHICH 35 WILL BE AFFORDABLE. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF IMMOKALEE ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 1000 FEET WEST OF JULIET BOULEVARD, IN SECTION 30, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, CONSISTING OF 9.35f ACRES; AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. [PL20190001600] WHEREAS, CIG, LLC, petitioned the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, to change the zoning classification of the herein described real property. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that: SECTION ONE: The zoning classification of the herein described real property located in Section 30, Township 48 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, is changed from Agricultural (A) Zoning District to a Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) for a 9.35± acre project to be known as Blue Coral Apartments RPUD, to allow 280 multi -family rental units, in accordance with Exhibits A through F attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein. The appropriate zoning atlas map or maps, as described in Ordinance Number 2004-41, as amended, the Collier County Land Development Code, is/are hereby amended accordingly. [20-CPS-01987/1612076/1]125 Blue Coral Apartments /PL20190001600 03/9/21 Page 1 Packet Pg. 58 9.A.e SECTION TWO: This Ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Department of State and on the date that the Growth Management Plan Amendment in Ordinance No. 2021 - becomes effective. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by super -majority vote of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this day of 2021. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS CRYSTAL K. KINZEL, CLERK COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA go , Deputy Clerk Approved as to form and legality: Heidi Ashton-Cicko Managing Assistant County Attorney Penny Taylor, Chairman Attachments: Exhibit A - List of Permitted Uses Exhibit B - Development and Design Standards Exhibit C - Master Concept Plan Exhibit D - Legal Description Exhibit E - Deviations Exhibit F - Development Commitments [20-CPS-01987/1612076/1] 125 Blue Coral Apartments /PL20190001600 03/9/21 Page 2 a aD E L Q Q L 0 U 0 m 0 0 to 0 0 0 0 N J a 0 0 0 Packet Pg. 59 9.A.e EXHIBIT "A" Permitted Uses: The Blue Coral Apartments shall be developed as a Residential use project, which will include studio, one bedroom, two bedroom and three -bedroom apartments with a density of 30 units per acre. The maximum unit total for this PUD shall be 280. Regulations for development of this PUD shall be in accordance with the contents of this document and all applicable sections of the Growth Management Plan (GMD), the Land Development Code (LDC), and the Administrative Code in the effect at the time of approval of the first Site Development Plan (SOP) or plat. Where the PUD ordinance does not provide development standards, then the provision of the specific sections of the LDC that are otherwise applicable shall apply. Tract A_ A. Principal Uses: 1. Preserve B. Accessory Uses: The only accessory uses allowed in the preserve area would be those permitted under LDCsections 4.06.02, 4.06.05.E.1 and 3.05.07. Tract B A. Principal Uses: 1. Multi -Family Rental Units 2. Any other principal use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing list of permitted principal uses, as determined by Hearing Examiner or the Board of Zoning Appeals (BZA) by the process outlined in the LDC. B. Accessory Uses: Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with the permitted principal uses andstructures, including, but not limited to: 1. Parking garage limited to residents and their guests. 2. Leasing Center 3. Fitness Facility limited to residents and their guests. 4. Clubhouse limited to residents and their guests. 5. Pools/Hot Tubs limited to residents and their guests. 6. Uses and Structures that are accessory and incidental to the Multifamily Residential use. Page 1 of 9 PL20190001600 Blue Coral Apartments PUDZ 4/20/2021 Packet Pg. 60 9.A.e EXHIBIT B DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS: Table I below sets forth the development standards for land uses within the proposed Blue Coral Apartments. Standards not specifically set forth within this application shall be those specified in applicable sections of the LDC in effect as of the date of approval of the SOP or Subdivision plat, consistent with RMF-16 zoning. TABLE I DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS PRINCIPAL USES ACCESSORY USES MINIMUM LOT AREA 43,560 Sq. Ft. N/A MINIMUM LOT WIDTH 150 Ft. NIA MINIMUM YARDS (External)* From North 150 Ft. SPS From South 150 Ft. SPS From West 80 Ft. SPS From East 25 Ft. SPS MIN. DISTANCE BETWEEN STRUCTURES 50% of the bldg. height, not less than 15' SPS MAXIMUM HEIGHT* Zoned 55 Ft. Actual 60 Ft. Zoned 30 Ft. Actual 35 Ft. MINIMUM FLOOR AREA Studio=450 sf 1 BR=600 sf 2+BR=750 sf Preserve 25' 10, * The proposed parking garage is considered an accessory use/structure whether it is attached or detached from the principal structure. It will meet accessory use development standards above. If the parking garage is constructed under the principal structure, the combined height may not exceed the actual height of 60 feet. Page 2 of 9 PL20190001600 Blue Coral Apartments PUDZ 4/20/2021 r N O N 0 N v 0 aD c cu c 0 N O N O N LO U IL U U r c m E t �a r w a Packet Pg. 61 9.A.e ° Iio;Dlrl awn " 1 � 1 s co 1 1 < 0 0 O n 1 _ > A Z D Fnn O m q 0 n 1 1 * < I Z W x 1'r✓''r a i r m T i h 1 Y y z r ao w j j > m n �1 m j 1 1 �6t;1; p 1 � v C 1 _ ` T M D i 1 Z D Z 1 y ` i �� T r H i mac, o D II Z v M 3ti1 A1U3d03d _— _. � 4 �.—_ L _ _.. � O 4i :r w C• C7 O (AVM iO IwxN .091) .—.._ T - _ _ ._.-. H P > N N N N f/Y N N P _ avOa BIV'AOwwl !� - - - cr T ---------— - - - - -- - -'• A fR •� ww Page 3 of 9 PL20190001600 Blue Coral Apartments PUDZ 4/20/2021 Packet Pg. 62 9.A.e Exhibit D LEGAL DESCRIPTION (O.R. 5460. PAGE 32) SECTION 30, TOWNSHIP 48-RANGE 26 W % OF E% OF NW% OF NW%, LESS N 100 FT R/W COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA. PL20190001600 Blue Coral Apartments PUDZ 4/20/2021 Page 4 of 9 Packet Pg. 63 9.A.e Exhibit "E" No deviations are requested. PL20190001600 Blue Coral Apartments PUDZ 4/20/2021 Page 5 of 9 Packet Pg. 64 9.A.e EXHIBIT F LIST OF DEVELOPER COMMITMENTS The purposed of this Section is to set forth the development commitments for the development ofthis project. One entity (hereinafter the Managing Entity) shall be responsible for PUD monitoring until close-out of the PUD, and this entity shall also be responsible for satisfying all PUDcommitments until close-out of the PUD. At the time of this PUD approval, the Managing Entity is CIG Naples, LLC., or its assigns. Should the Managing Entity desire to transfer the monitoring and commitments to a successor entity, then it must provide a copy of a legally binding document that needs to be approved for legal sufficiency by theCounty Attorney. After such approval, the Managing Entity will be released of its obligations upon written approval of the transfer by County staff, and the successor entity shall become the Managing Entity. As Owner and Developer sell off tracts, the Managing Entity shall provide written notice to County that includes an acknowledgement of the commitments required by the PUD by the new owner and the new owner's agreement to comply with the Commitments through the Managing Entity, but the Managing Entity shall not be relieved of its responsibility under this Section. When the PUD is closed -out, then the Managing Entity is no longer responsible for the monitoring and fulfillment ofPUD commitments. 2. Issuance of a development permit by a county does not in any way create any rights onthe part of the applicant to obtain a permit from a state or federal agency and does not create any liability on the part of the county for issuance of the permit if the applicant fails to obtain requisite approvals or fulfill the obligations imposed by a state or federalagency or undertakes actions that result in a violation of state or federal law." (Section 125.022, FS) 3. All other applicable state or federal permits must be obtained before commencement ofthe development. 1 of 4 PL20190001600 Blue Coral Apartments PUDZ 4/20/2021 Page 6 of 9 Packet Pg. 65 9.A.e 4. The Master Plan, attached hereto as Exhibit C (Agnoli Barber & Brundage Project No. 20-0003) is an illustrative preliminary development plan. The design elements and layout illustrated on the Master Plan shall be understood to be flexible, so that the final design may satisfy the Developer's criteria and comply with all applicable requirements of this Ordinance. Changes may be made in accordance with the LDC. 1. The maximum vehicle trip generation for the PUD shall not exceed 119 two-way PM peak hour net new external trips based on the use codes in the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual in effect at the time of application for SDP or plat approval. 2. Access to the project will be via a shared access with the property to the east on the eastern property line of this project. If the shared access split by the property line is not granted, access will be afforded on the subject property only and will also accommodate cross access to the property to the East. Design, permitting and construction of the shared access shall be at the time of the first SDP or Plat. 3. Access points shown on the PUD Master Plan are considered to be conceptual. Nothing depicted on any such Master Plan shall vest any right of access at any specific point along any property boundary. The number of access points constructed may be less than the number depicted on the Master Plan; however, no additional access points shall be considered unless a PUD amendment is approved. 4. All internal roads, driveways, alleys, pathways, sidewalks, interconnections to adjacent developments shall be operated and maintained by an entity created by the developer in accordance with the applicable regulations of the State of Florida. Collier County shall have no responsibility for maintenance of any such facilities. 5. If any required turn lane improvement requires the use of any existing County rights of way or easement(s), then compensating right-of-way shall be provided at no cost to CollierCounty as a consequence of such improvement(s). 6. Fifteen (15) feet of the northernmost portion of the property just west of the proposed shared access shall be dedicated to Collier County in the form of a road easement in order to accommodate a right -in eastbound turn lane. Owner shall convey the fifteen (15) foot easement to Collier County at no cost to the County at the time of Site Development Plan approval, free and clear of all liens and encumbrances. PL20190001600 Blue Coral Apartments PUDZ 4/20/2021 Page 7 of 9 Packet Pg. 66 9.A.e 7. Vehicular and Pedestrian interconnection will be provided to the abutting properties on the east and west to allow access to all connection points with the shared project access along Immokalee Road and across the abutting property to the east to Useppa Way and Juliet Boulevard, consistent with the conceptual PUD Master Plan, _Exhibit C. The final location of the access point will be coordinated with the adjacent property owner and a cross -access easement will be provided, or an access easement for public use without responsibility of maintenance by Collier County, at time of the first Site Development Plan or Plat. The connection and supporting infrastructure will be constructed to the property line by the developer or successors or assigns prior to the first Certificate of Occupancy. The interconnections shall remain open to the public. ENVIRONMENTAL 1. The southernmost portion of the property shall have a designated preserve. The area of the preserve shall equate to 15% of the native vegetation on the site. Total native vegetation on the site is 7.89 acres (Passarella & Associates, Inc, Project No. 20CJG3219). 7.89 acresx 15% =1.18 acre preserve. 2. Preserves may be used to satisfy the landscape buffer requirements after exotic vegetation removal in accordance with LDC sections 4.06.02 and 4.06.05.E. I Supplemental plantings with native plant materials shall be in accordance with LDC section 3.05.07. 3. Ten (10) feet of the southernmost portion of the southern twenty five (25) foot principal setback from the preserve shall have no site alteration, placement of fill, grading, plant alteration or removal or similar activity abutting the preserve. 1. Storm water shall not be discharged into the preserve area until it has been fully treated inaccordance with Collier County and Water Management District standards. PUBLIC UTILITIES 1. The developer shall complete a minimum 8" water main loop between the adjacent Eboli (AKA Bermuda Palms) and Germain Immokalee PUDs. The water main shall connect the existing 8" water main serving Bermuda Palms to a future 8 water main to be extended through Germain Immokalee from an existing 8" water main stub -out at Useppa Way. If a point of connection at Germain Immokalee does not exist at the time of project development, the water main shall be terminated at the property line with an automatic water main flushing device, as shown in detail W 2 of the Collier County Utilities Standards Manual, ordinance No. 2004-31. If a connection to the existing 8" water main serving PL20190001600 Blue Coral Apartments PUDZ 4/20/2021 Page 8 of 9 Packet Pg. 67 9.A.e Bermuda Palms is deemed infeasible by Collier County staff at the time of project development, the developer shall instead connect to the existing 20" water main on the north side of Immokalee Road. The water main will be conveyed to the Collier County Water -Sewer District within a County Utility Easement (CUE) at least 15 feet in width, in accordance with the Collier County Utilities Standards and Procedures Ordinance, at no cost to the County or District, and free and clear of all liens and encumbrances, prior to or concurrent with preliminary acceptance of utilities. 1. Twenty five percent (25%) of the total units (70 units) will be rented to Essential Services Personnel ("ESP"). ESP means natural persons or families at least one of whom is employed as police or fire personnel, a child care worker, a teacher or other education personnel, health care personnel or a public employee. Any time that a unit becomes vacant, assuming that less than 70 units are occupied by ESP, the next available unit will be offered to ESP. In the event that no ESP rents the available unit within thirty (30) days of advertisement of its availability, then the unit may be offered to the general public. This commitment to ESP shall remain in effect for a period of time that is 30 years from the date that the development receives its final certificate of occupancy. 2. Of the seventy ESP units, thirty five (35) of those units will be income and rent restricted. Ten (10) of the units will be designated for those households whose incomes are less than 80% of the AMI for Collier County. Fifteen (15) of the units will be designated for households whose incomes are between 80% and 90% of AMI for Collier County, and ten (10) of the units will be designated for households whose incomes are between 90% and 100% of the AMI for Collier County. These units will be committed for a period of 30 years and AMI rent limit adjustments will be made on an annual basis according to the most recent Collier County Board approved Table of Rental Rates for each income category and the number of bedrooms in the unit. PL20190001600 Blue Coral Apartments PUDZ 4/20/2021 Page 9 of 9 Packet Pg. 68 9.A.f Blue Coral Apartments Development Standards Comparison Table Detached Attached Single Two -Family & Multi Family Group Amenity Single Family & Zero Lot Line Housing Area Family Townhouse Principal Structures Minimum Lot Area Blue Coral Apartments RPUD n/a n/a n/a 1 acre n/a n/a 6,000 s.f 5,500 s.f. per 1,200 s.f per n/a n/a 10,000 s.f. KASE MPUD unit unit April Circle PUD n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Eboli PUD n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Livingston Lakes n/a n/a n/a 1 acre n/a n/a Carlton Lakes PUD 6,000 s.f 2,400 s.f. 2,400s.f.— 2,400 s.f— n/a n/a Two family Villas/Multi row /Duplex House Family 4,800 s.f — Zero Lot Line Minimum Lot Width Blue Coral Apartments RPUD n/a n/a n/a 150 feet n/a n/a KASE MPUD 50 feet 100 feet 80 feet n/a n/a n/a April Circle n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Eboli n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Livingston Lakes n/a n/a n/a 150 feet n/a n/a Carlton Lakes PUD 50 - Site 20 - Site width 24- Site width 20 - Site width n/a n/a width 18 - Min average 20- Min average 18 - Min 26- Min cord length cord length for average cord average cord Two length length Family/Duplex 40 — Site Villas/Multi row Width House Family 26- Min average cord length for Zero Lot Line Site Width Minimum Floor Area Blue Coral Apartments RPUD n/a n/a n/a Studio: 450 sf n/a n/a One bedroom: 600 sf Two Bedroom +: 750 sf KASE MPUD 1,200 s.f. 1,000 S.f. 1,000 S.f. 750 s.f. n/a n/a April Circle n/a n/a n/a Efficiency: 450 n/a n/a to 600 s.f One bedroom: 450 to 900 s.f. Two bedroom: 650 to 1,100 s.f. Three bedroom: 900 to 1,250 s.f Eboli n/a One bedroom: One bedroom: One bedroom: n/a n, a 765 s.f 765 s.f. 765 s.f. Two bedroom: Two bedroom: Two bedroom: 1,000 s.f 1,000 s.f 1,000 s.f Three bedroom: Three Three 1,150 s.f. bedroom: bedroom: 1,150 1,150 s.f s.f. Livingston Lakes n/a n/a n/a 750 s.f. n/a n/a Carlton Lakes 1,200 s.f 1,000 S.f. 1,000 s.f. — 1000 S.f. — n/a' n/a Zero Lot Line Villas/Multi and Two family row House /Duplex Family a Packet Pg. 69 9.A.f Detached Attached Single Two -Family & Multi Family Group Amenity Single Family Family & Zero Lot Line Housing Area Townhouse Minimum Front Yard n/a n/a n/a 150 feet for n/a n/a Blue Coral Apartments RPUD Principal and Accessory 20 feet for 20 feet for 20 feet for 30 feet for 30 feet for 20 feet for KASE MPUD Principal Principal and Principal and Principal and Principal Principal and Accessory Accessory Accessory and and Accessory Accessory Accessory April Circle n/a n/a n/a 30 feet n/a n/a Eboli n/a 90 feet from 90 feet from 90 feet from n/a n/a Immokalee Immokalee Immokalee Road right -of- Road right -of- Road right-of- way way way Livingston Lakes n/a n/a n/a 35 feet for n/a n/a Principal and Accessory Carlton Lakes PUD 18 feet 18 feet for 18 for principal 18 for principal n/a ni a for principal principal Zero Lot line and/Duplex 10 or 15 if 10 or 15 if setback includes setback includes 10 or 15 if sidewalk for sidewalk for setback includes accessory accessory sidewalk for accessory Two family /Du lex Minimum Side Yard n/a n/a n/a 25 feet from the n/a n/a Blue Coral Apartments RPUD Eastern Boundary and 80 feet from Western Boundary for Principal and Accessory KASE MPUD 5 feet for 0/101 feet for 015 feetl for 15 feet 15 feet 10 feet for Principal and Principal and Principal Principal Principal Principal Accessory Accessory and 10 feet 10 feet- and Accessory Accessory Accessory Accessory April Circle n/a n/a n/a 30 feet n/a n/a Eboli n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Livingston Lakes n/a n/a n/a 15 feet for n/a n/a Principal and Accessory Carlton Lakes PUD 5 or half the 7.5 or half the 5 or 0 or half the 15 feet n/a n/a structures structures height structures height or half the height and and twenty five and twenty five structures height twenty five feet if setback feet if setback and twenty five feet if setback encumbers a encumbers a feet if setback encumbers a lakes lakes encumbers a lakes maintenance maintenance lakes maintenance easement easement —Patio maintenance easement accessory Zero Lot Line easement accessory Villas/Multi 7.5 or half the row House structures height Family and twenty five feet if setback encumbers a lakes maintenance easement — Duplex 15 feet for 10 feet for side 10 feet for side 15 feet for side 15 feet for side entry entry garage entry garage entry garage side entry garage garage Minimum Rear Yard a Packet Pg. 70 9.A.f n/a n/a n/a 150 feet for n/a n/a Blue Coral Apartments RPUD Principal and Accessory KASE MPUD 20 feet 20 feet for 20 feet for 30 feet— 30 feet 20 feet for for Principal Principal Principal Principal Principal Principal and and 20 feet - 20 feet - and and Accessory Accessory Accessory Accessory Accessory Accessory April Circle n/a n/a n/a 30 feet n/a n/a Eboli n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Livingston Lakes n/a n/a n/a 30 feet for n/a n/a Principal 20 feet for detached and 10 feet for attached for Accessory Carlton Lakes PUD 15 or half the 15 or half the 15 or half the 15 or half the n/a n/a structures structures height structures height structures height height and and twenty five and twenty five and twenty five twenty five feet if setback feet if setback feet if setback feet if setback encumbers a encumbers a encumbers a encumbers a lakes lakes lakes lakes maintenance maintenance maintenance maintenance easement - easement - easement - easement - principal principal principal principal 10 or half the 10 or half the 10 or half the 10 or half the structures height structures height structures height structures and twenty five and twenty five and twenty five height and feet if setback feet if setback feet if setback twenty five encumbers a encumbers a encumbers a feet if setback lakes lakes lakes encumbers a maintenance maintenance maintenance lakes easement easement easement maintenance accessory accessory accessory easement accessory IL N c 0 E V- cc M Q L O V m m 0 0 m 0 0 0 rn 0 N J a Q Packet Pg. 71 9.A.f Minimum Preserve Setback n/a n/a n/a 25 feet for n/a n/a Blue Coral Apartments Principal and 10 RPUD feet for Accessory KASE MPUD 25 feet — 25 feet— 25 feet— 25 feet— 25 feet— 25 feet — Principal Principal Principal Principal Principal Principal 10 feet - 10 feet - 10 feet - 10 feet - 10 feet - 10 feet - Accessory Accessory Accessory Accessory Accessory Accessory April Circle n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Eboli n/a 20 feet 20 feet 20 feet n/a n/a Livingston Lakes n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Carlton Lakes PUD n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Minimum PUD Setback n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Blue Coral Apartments RPUD KASE MPUD 15 feet 15 feet 15 feet 15 feet 15 feet North & East: 100 feet South & West: 35 feet April Circle n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Eboli n/a Yards from the Yards from the Yards from the n/a n/a Eastern and Eastern and Eastern and Western PUD Western PUD Western PUD Boundaries— 20 Boundaries— Boundaries — feet for 1 story 20 feet for 1 20 feet for 1 structures and story structures story structures 30 feet for two and 30 feet for and 30 feet for story structures two sto two story Yards from the structures structures Southern PUD Yards from the Yards from the Boundary — 70 Southern PUD Southern PUD feet Boundary 70 Boundary 70 feet feet Livingston Lakes n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Carlton Lakes PUD n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a Q Packet Pg. 72 9.A.f Minimum distance between structures Blue Coral Apartments n/a n/a n/a 50 % of the n/a n/a RPUD building height, not less than 15 feet KASE MPUD 10 feet 20 feet 10 feet 15 feet 15 feet 15 feet April Circle n/a n/a n/a 15 feet n/a n/a Eboli n/a Between one Between one Between one n/a n/a story and one- story and one- story and one- story strictures — story strictures story strictures 10 feet — 10 feet — 10 feet Between one Between one Between one story and two- story and two- story and two- story structures— story structures story structures 15 feet 15 feet 15 feet Between two Between two Between two story and two- story and two- story and two- story structures — story structures story structures 20 feet — 20 feet — 20 feet Livingston Lakes n/a n/a n/a 15 feet, or one- n/a till half of the sum of the heights of adjacent buildings, whichever is greater for Principal 10 feet for Accessory Carlton Lakes PUD 15 feet or a 15 feet or a 15 feet or a 15 feet or a n/a n/a distance equal distance equal distance equal to distance equal to one-half the to one-half the one-half the sum to one-half sum of their heights, which sum of their of their heights, which ever is the sum of ever is greater heights, which greater their heights, ever is greater which ever is greater Minimum Height Zoned Actual Blue Coral Apartments n/a n/a n/a 55 Principal n/a n/a RPUD 30 Accessory Zoned 60 Principal Actual 35 Feet KASE MPUD Zoned 30 feet 30 feet 30 feet 40 feet 40 feet 30 feet Actual 35 feet 35 feet 35 feet 47 feet for 47 feet for 35 feet for for Principal for Principal and for Principal Principal and Principal Principal and Accessory Accessory and Accessory 35 feet and 35 and 40 feet for feet Accessory Accessory 40 feet for Accessory April Circle n/a n/a n/a Two stories n/a n/a Zoned Actual Eboli n/a 35 feet not to 35 feet not to 35 feet not to Zoned exceed 2 stories exceed 2 stories exceed 2 stories 25 feet Actual over parking for over parking for over parking for Principal Principal Principal 15 feet for 15 feet for 15 feet for Accessory Accessory Accessory S Q Packet Pg. 73 9.A.f Livingston Lakes n/a n/a n/a 3 habitable n/a n/a Zoned floors for Actual Principal 35 feet or two stories whichever is greater for Accesso Carlton Lakes 35 -above MFL 35 -Attached 35 -above MFL 35 -above MFL n a n/a Zoned Actual 100 year single family 100 year 100 year principal and above MFL 100 principal and principal and accessory year principal and accessory accessory accessory 50 -above MFL 50 — Townhouse 100 year principal principal 35 — Townhouse Villas/Multi accessory Row House Family 35 -accessory Villas/Multi Row House Family (1) Kase MPUD: Must be at least 10 feet between structures 0 M 0 0 N T_ N O N ti Lh C O N �L E �O♦ V L d O. O d m y.i n Q Cd G t V Q Packet Pg. 74 9.A.g Blue Coral Apartments Petitions PL20190001600 & PL20190001620 Planned Unit Development & Growth Management Plan Amendment Neighborhood Information Meeting New Hope Ministries 7675 Davis Blvd, Naples, R-34104 August 25, 2020 at 6pm Summary of Meeting 9gnswere placed outside and within the church for attendeesto find the meeting location. ABB provided face mask and hand sanitizer to attendees at the table at the entrance of the room. Individual sign in sheets and penswere provided at every seat while accommodating social distancing guidelines. The meeting was called to order at approximately 6:02pm by Tom Barber with Agnoli, Barber & Brundage to talk about Blue Coral Apartments. He then introduced David Bastos and Gregg Fusaro with ClGNaples, Land Use Attorney Jeff Wright, Engineer DominicAmico, Transportation Norman Trebilcock, and Environmentalists Bethany Brosius. Tom Barber then begins Zoom Call presentation explaining the project location is about half a mile West of 175 south side of Immokalee road, subject site in yellow near Walmart extra space storage Marriott suites and seed to table, area in purple isthe proposed Germain Immokalee PUD/GMPA. Future land Use exhibit shown in pink isthe activity center number 4 and yellow is our project site which is in the urban residential subdistrict and purple isthe Germain Immokalee proposed subdistrict blue is Seed to Table commercial subdistrict isthe parking area. Looking closer at the layout most of the existing properties have been developed into PUD whether is residential or commercial or mixed -use PUD. This project will consist of 280 units, multi -family residential development that include studio one bedroom two bedroom and three -bedroom residences. The project will buffer residencesto the west from neighboring commercial developments, this is a logical transition from a high intensity commercial activity center. Property is zoned Ag-2, its 9.35 acres and will be applying for two different applications the Growth Management Plan Amendment and Planned Unit Development. As part of the Growth Management Plan Amendment, certain requirements are set forth the subdistrict 9.35 acres and the development will be encouraged to be a Planned Unit Development and maximum density allowed 30 units per acre. With the Growth Management Plan Amendment, a future land use element will need to be amended and subdistrict map created, Blue Coral apartments subdistrict. The Planned Unit Development will be broken into two tracts, tract Awill be the preserve and tract Bwill be principle use of the residential multi -family. Accessory usesto the multi family use will be the leasing center, fitnessfacility, clubhouse, pools, hot tubs, and other uses. The development standardsfor the PUD set forth how the project will be Packet Pg. 75 9.A.g developed, there is minimum square footage for the apartments, zoned height will be 55ft, the setbacksfrom the boundarieswill generally be 50 percent of the building height. PUD is set forth for the Master Concept Plan, tract A on the left will be the preserve and tract Bwill be development and I will go through the development and layout on the next slide, but you can see the access points by the arrows. Looking at overall perspective the project site shown in yellow fits in well with the other surrounding developments. From a transportation perspective the trip cap is proposed at 119 pm peak hours two- way tripsand the project will have a shared accesswith interconnections to adjacent properties. The site will be buffered to the east and west with 15-foot type B buffers and to the south with roughly 170-foot preserve. Conceptual design of the site is laid out so that the building will be facing the east far away from the residential area as possible, well landscaped and buffered from the other surrounding areas. In the middle of the buildingswill have some of the amenities, parking structure in between the buildingsand parking on site with access pointsto the east will be shared with the neighboring development. Here are some of the proposed rent for those units, some of the unitswill be at 80 to 100 percent of the area median income which will help with some of the workforce housing that is needed in collier county So looking at buffers, the buffer to the south facing the Livingston Lakeswill be 170 foot preserve and the buildingswill be roughly 250 feet apart, the dash blue line isthe site line what the view might look like from the second floor of Livingston lakes building. To the west of abutting Bermuda Palms the buildings are roughly 200 feet apart and in between is a parking area from Bermuda Palms, drive aisle with parking, their buffer, 15 feet type B buffer, another drive aisle parking area with 5 foot sidewalk with foundation plants in front the building. So looking along Immokalee Fbad, from the southern profile perspective the areas in orange reflect commercial and the areas in blue are residential so moving to east to west you can see this is a transition down from commercial to residential. With the proposed project shown in black from the bottom roughly around 49 feet tall. Connectivity is important so we are going to connect to the existing sitesto the proposed sites and allow accessto Juliet Blvd. to take some of the strain off Immokalee road Also, the preserve has been laid out to allow connectivity to the other existing preservesand buffer residencesto the south. The lighting will be designed intentionally so that the parking is lit from asfar away from communities as possible. There will be safety lighting as wel I. Just some of the project highlights, it will have a thoughtful and intentional design. It is laid out to diminish impact on surrounding communities. It will allow for a multi -family residential development that will include studio, one bedroom, two bedrooms, and three -bedroom residences. It will be an appropriate transition from the high intensity commercial. It does respond to the needsto Collier County workforce that currently commute from rural residential areas by design and the development will incorporate unitsthat are smaller square footage and create workforce affordability. So, if all the Zoom attendees can please email me their information, name and address on the following slide and I can entertain any questionsyou might have. So, if you want to raise your hand if you have any questions, I would be happy to unmute you and answer your questions. "Tom states to the Zoom Meeting". No questionswere asked Packet Pg. 76 9.A.g James Sabo then asked how many people are on Zoom, Tom states right now just 2. Does anybody here have any questions. If you do have any questions please email me ill be happy to answer them, thank you very much for coming. James Sabo then ask if both Zoom meeting people got the email address, Tom answersyes, I believe so it was on the slide. Jamesthen introduces himself; he iswith the county asthe principal planner of the project and if anyone has any questions, you do have my email. Tom states, there were 2 people online. The meeting was adjourned at about 6:15pm. This meeting was audio recorded by Agnoli, Barber & Brundage; a copy of which has been provided to the County. The meeting summary was also prepared byAgnoli, Barber & Brundage. Packet Pg. 77 9.A.g NBGHBORHOOD INFORMATION M B=TING The public is invited to attend a Neighborhood Information Meeting, Agnoli, Barber, & Brundage Inc., on: Tuesday, August 25th, 2020 at 6:00 p.m., at the New Hope Ministries, located at 7675 Davis Blvd, Naples, Florida, 34104 Aformal application has been submitted to Collier County seeking approval for a Ranned Unit Development under PL20190001600 and a Growth Management Ran Amendment under R20190001620. The 9.35-acre site located on the south side of Immokalee Fb, just west of Juliet Blvd and east of Livingston Rd. The petitioner is asking the County to approve these applicationsto rezone the property and allow for a multi -family residential development and associated uses. The proposed multi -family project will follow the development standards of R\A F 16 and is also proposing a density of 30 units per acre. If you have any questions, comments or do not feel comfortable attending the meeting in person you do have the opportunity to participate virtually via an online zoom meeting. At this meeting, the petitioner will explain the project in detail, record your input as an interested neighbor and answer any questions you may have. The link and passcode for the online zoom meeting are shown below. Link: https://us04web.zoom.us/j/75501266443?pwd=LzFQYUs4bm45eUlR\/khOYmwxczV5Zz09 Meeting I D: 755 0126 6443 Passoode: 658876 If you are unable to attend the meeting in person or participate virtually, and have questions or comments, they can also be directed by mail, phone, or e-mail to the individual below: 7400 Trail Boulevard, -';,.ite 200 Naples, R-34108 E' Telephone: (239) 597-3111 Thomas D. Barber, AICP Emil: (239) 566-2203 Emil: tombarber@abbinc.com Packet Pg. 78 9.A.g L. � e6ea •,. Classifieds I assiTeds.naplesnews.com 1 Classifieds Phone:2B9.263-00 1 Classifieds Email: clud/led@mtHiliwwasom 1 Public Notices/Legals Email:lapals@naplxnewa.com = VISA ' io •t m� NppyadS tR4: ones �M 59 see® cle; ompanlonship, dl men, mov beach. Ed 239A36-3942 0 Rosiness LG RefNgerator/1r Ste, apponunita, kale, Invest.. $$Soo.5o LG sta0aless steel —d ifl 5 years old excellent candid .1, 21.8 Cubic feet at Pembroke Welsh he.9 Pups- storage. $1,200.00new.4 AKC reg, shots, ont, d. pick up.. (314)651-1184 commercial/Office Male/Female, parents tert d. 900 sq.(239)2 mo+eurowx E1,500.ssort4-5002. LO1m, Microwave great con- (339)2623121 111 (2l GE white 1300 watt Assorted $30 ,m.d ,-R. a 111 Therm Sid. Refrigerator Freezer, Side ft Side, ice m old. er, l 9s cu. k., 6 Years old, BV OWNER -Prime BAVSHORE sold far $8,500, excellem loc. 213H1 acre. MOltl-aoned all Wnds of things.. oend. selling for $1,25o. 239- Cityse A,A,. 239-352-8216 450-2fi58 Adopt Me A NEW ENGpUlNO <olledor nantst uuY all bees of neenri es. eatore roa all your favorites.. IL ie se n for 2nd opinlonyy, ylou may be PIe8062965894sed. Havanese Dog E500.00 o1, Male, 10 months, White with ANTIQUES is ART WANFED black antl55gray spots, Courteous Palm Beach neutered,allsM1atsu plmdate. Buyer seeks: Quality q�COaDS-aR Cushion (301)904-0615 paintings, sculpture, glass, perear.lORETenn96race- porcelaln,silver, let. Rolex.239-250-3832 �� jewelry. Tiffany, Cartier, modem art, Picasso, Warhol, old martens, Chln,.P 2 Power Palliser Burgundy ti 1 de, bronze, Iswther rxlinem. Pot561j 801-0222 Clean, excellent mndmm l $485. 239-59S_s H mes Power Lift <hairuReciner, 5 yr _ llyye� used. 5450 firm. 239)84-8286 01 Homes Homes 1"18 In Partnership with the leID,E;wowKY LOCAL) Reach More People. Get More Leads. spend Less Money. "arting S IOW ra trnn Deliver Compelling Messages Reach the Neighborhood Leads You Own, Delivered in Real Time Queen Size Part Per, Beauti- ful Wood Frame Queen Saetl bed with step up Great Con ditto, t o, Head, Faat and Ra h Included Yau pick up, $$400.00.(314)651-1184 Wood Queen Bedroom Set; 2 nmgol, stands, dresser Irror, ar Ire,2lamps,TV.Like newl 1850. 239-5955389 Walker Mower - 92' mulch deck a ew ndeck. $3,250. 239- 29 3096 Hoveround, Merit, Pride Mobilityry chairs & scomen. $20b$8 CAI: 23.300. Marco35-15fi5 Island Real Estate fitafing hesh... 1. k from Vanderbik Beach. m keyY. E510,000, 2/2+den, private beachaccess garage, pool, tennis, 239fi41-0 `i HAMPFON-S, 22 NEW RE. MODEL $213,000 OPEN SUN. DAY 1 1820 Kingg (239)53J-32J6 Lake Blvd. #103, �Fu WNER-Beautiful updatedsale 5335,ra0, 31950 sq feel oneBolmIanY built 200J, great In beaudtul om- Public Notices a =Br yy OPPORTUNITY All real" apt. aH--ling in h z newspaper s subject to the Federal Fa r Hous ng Act f 196a which makes t Illeff99al to advertise any drurlminatloln b n d n r olor, rellgion. se; national origin, handicap or familial rtatus or an Intention to make any such preference, IlmltaUon or dkmrd (nation. This newspaper will not knowln W, Isln9 focreante" wde ' Cm-latioe hereby Informed that on dw Ilings wspapea retlavaiaible on n equa opportunity basis. Naples: Wheelchalr Accessible Home with 3 ra ps. 38 ,_ r wIdttk. 55+ wmm. $230,000. 239-3006341. OpenS� Walk 8,85 Zurlgo Ln 4RR13+RA Pr ese ,e L,k, Views,solar poopspa.$120K MLS 220039180 Chellie Doepke 239-8JJ-1722 Premier Plus Realty Co Real Estate greatgreat pl B11 Sprin952� 5,'Rod last &csec9ln<Igwater.l 239-24"9351239�25P7636 Marco Island- Turn -Key spa- lous beach iron , 21R, 2BA, Island News, for lease. Securi- ty deposit 440SJ1.1523. Public Notices Condolrownhome Rem �_ N 1 i1° Ili L III 26al— AvldrlvewaNaPles 2br, or,Pool a aub.,k .blellnd'dmNo smok- ing. No Pets. 516-31-las Available Nowl $1,550, Naples Park Duplex, 2 bdrm, 2 no, JOS 101A AVE N, Naples, Florida t239)250-9838 BONnASPRINGS 1 BD, i8A near eonita Beach Some Peh ok, E1095 Call: 239.850.459) E1500 34104 Naple; pet ask pool, (239)200-58fi9 Naples, 12111. 3 bdrm, 2 ba, _2. Golden Gate Ertatm - Naples, Refrlgerator, Washer, Dryer lec, gar, gourmet kit, hdwd firs, Ingrd paal, launtlry offal pkg, refrlg., Home 1.3Nl70.JJ31 �TipRecrurter .•,i %•,, Public Notices PetitionsPL20190001600 & PL20190001620 The public is invited to attend a neighborhood information meeting in person or via Zoom Meeting held by Thomas D. Barber, AICP, of Agnelli, Barber & Brundage, Inc., representing CIG Naples, LLC. Tuesday, August 25th, 2020 at 6 pin. New Hope Ministries 7675 Davis Blvd, Naples, FL 34104 Subject Property: Parcel No. 00198000006 The property owner is petitioning Collier County to approve a Planned Unit Development and a Growth Management Plan Amendment to rezone the property to allow for a multi -family residential development and associated uses. Zoom Meeting Info: WE VALUE YOUR INPUT Business and property owners, residents and visitors are welcome to attend the presentation, review project materials and discuss the project with the owner and Collier County staff. If you are unable to attend this meeting, but have questions or comments, they can be directed by ..it, phone, fax, or e-mail to: Thomas D. Barber, AICP Agnoli, Barber & Brundage, Inc. 7400 Trail Boudevard, Suite 200 Naples, FL 34108 Telephone: (239) 597-3111 Faesimile: (239) 566-2203 Email: tom.barber@abbine.com Packet Pg. 79 9.A.g Navt�s at Oxus PART OFTH@ USATODAY NETWORK Published Daily Naples, FL 34110 Agnoli Barber Brundage Inc 7400 Trail Blvd Naples, FL 34108 Affidavit of Publication STATE OF WISCONSIN COUNTY OF BROWN Before the undersigned they serve as the authority, personally appeared said legal clerk who on oath says that he/she serves as Legal Clerk of the Naples Daily News, a daily newspaper published at Naples, in Collier County, Florida; distributed in Collier and Lee counties of Florida; that the attached copy of the advertising was published in said newspaper on dates listed. Affiant further says that the said Naples Daily News is a newspaper published at Naples, in said Collier County, Florida, and that the said newspaper has heretofore been continuously published in said Collier County, Florida; distributed in Collier and Lee counties of Florida, each day and has been entered as second class mail matter at the post office in Naples, in said Collier County, Florida , for a period of one year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement and affiant further says that he has neither paid nor promised any person, or corporation any discount , rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this advertisement for publication in the said newspaper. 08/10/2020 — IA& -- Subscribed and sworn to before on August 28, 2020: Notary, State of WI, County of Brown TARA MONDLOCH Notary Public, State of Wisconsin My commission expires: August 6, 2021 Publication Cost: $1,040.26 Ad No: GC10470791 Customer No: 531687 PO#: Packet Pg. 80 NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING 9.A.g Petitions PL20190001600 & PL20190001620 The public is invited to attend a neighborhood information meeting in person or via Zoom Meeting held by Thomas D. Barber, AICP, of Agnoli, Barber & Brundage, Inc., representing CIG Naples, LLC. Tuesday, August 25th, 2020 at 6 p.m. New Hope Ministries 7675 Davis Blvd, Naples, FL 34104 Subject Property: Parcel No. 00198000006 The property owner is petitioning Collier County to approve a Planned Unit Development and a Growth Management Plan Amendment to rezone the property to allow for a multi -family residential development and associated uses. Zoom Meeting Info: WE VALUE YOUR INPUT Business and property owners, residents and visitors are welcome to attend the presentation, review project materials and discuss the project with the owner and Collier County staff. If you are unable to attend this meeting, but have questions or comments, they can be directed by mail, phone, fax, or e-mail to: Thomas D. Barber, AICP Agnoli, Barber & Brundage, Inc. 7400 Trail Boulevard, Suite 200 Naples, FL 34108 Telephone: (239) 597-3111 Facsimile: (239) 566-2203 Email: tom.barber(L&abbinc.com ://us04wel).zooi-n.us/j/75501266443"pwd=LzFQYI-ls4bm45etJl OYmwxczV 5ZzO9 Meeting ID: 755 0126 6443 Passcode: 658876 Packet Pg. 81 9.A.g AFFIDAVIT OF COMPLIANCE I hereby certify that pursuant to Ordinance 2004-41, of the Collier County Land Development Code, I did cause the attached newspaper advertisement to appear and I did give notice by mail to the following property owners and/or condominium and civic associations whose members may be affected by the proposed land use changes of an application request for a rezoning, PUD amendment, or conditional use, at least 15 days prior to the scheduled Neighborhood Information Meeting. For the purposes of this requirement, the names and addresses of property owners shall be deemed those appearing on the latest tax rolls of Collier County and any other persons or entities who have made a formal request of the county to be notified. The said notice contained the laymen's description of the site property of proposed change and the date, time, and place of a Neighborhood Information Meeting. Per the attached letters, property owner's list, and copy of newspaper advertisement which are hereby made a part of this Affidavit of Compliance 1� Thomas D. Barber, AICP State of Florida County of Collier The foregoing Affidavit of compliance was acknowledged before me thisA�day of August, 2020 by Thomas D. Barber, who is personally known to me. by S 0-r oArCaj pesw e (Signature of N�}otaarryy Pulblic)0 "-NJAr5�K 1C6-beiA Printed Name of Notary DENISE R. RAIQCH Wwissim # GG NMI * * Expires May 24, 2022 spy OF�oP� BadedTnk*dNdwys-ices (Notary Seal) Packet Pg. 82 9.A.g This data belongs to the Collier County properly Appraiser s Olhce (CCPA]. Therefore, the recipient agre¢a-rmt to repr¢s¢rrt this data to any¢n¢ as other than CCPA provided data. The recipient may not - this date w others without consent from the CCPA. PL201SM16GD & PL20191=1620 I Huffer: 500' I Date: 612511 1 Site Lo lon: 00198000006 4940 COUGAR CT SOUTH 4101 LLC 4945 COUGAR COURT S #101 LLC 4945 COUGAR CT S #102 LLC 4965 SANDRA BAY DRIVE #101 LLC 574732 ONTARIO LIMITED ADAMCHEK, STANLEY ANDERSON. KENNETH ❑ AULETTA, JEAN e P DEVCD LLc SALANICA, ADRIAN BALL, CHRISTOPHER BELL, DEB RAN 15ERMUDA PALMS 2-205 LAND TRUST BERMODA PALMS 3-101 LAND TRUST BERMODA PALMS 3-205 LAND TRUST PERMUDA PALMS OF NAPLES REP UDA PALMS UNIT #105 LLC BERMUDA PALMS UNIT #202 LLC BETHEL, JILL REBECCA BIENER, NEAL & LISA M BISSMEYER II, WILLIAM C BLANCHARD, MICHI J BONFIGLIO, NICHOLAS R BOWEN, ROSANNEE BRAINERD, KATHLEEN G BROCCOLI RR, STEVEN J BUCCA, MARIA BU LTINCK, STEFAAN E BUNCH_ W THOMAS & GAIL M BURKS, WILLIAM R & ELVA H BUTLER LAKE DRIVE LLC CALDWELL. RONALD D CAMPANALE, FRANK CAMPOBASSO, MARINA ROSA CAPRI071, JOSEPH E & EILEEN M CARDONA, ARIEL & DORA CARDONA,CARLOS CARLTON LAKES MASTER ASSN INC CARLTON LAKES MASTER ASSN INC CARL70N LAKES MASTER ASSN INC CARLTON LAKES MASTER ASSN INC CAROLLO, CARMEN) CASHION, CHRISTOPHER M CASIMINL ALEXA ROSE CHASING PARADISE LLC CHEGWIBBEN, MALL KENNETH CHESSER, KATHY K CHEVEZ, ANTONIO & HALYMA CHRIST. ANN CIANTI, KIRSTIN CIVETTI, JAY P CLARK, JEFFREY A & LISA F CLAP SSEN, ROBERT G & NORMA M CNC INVESTMENTS LLC COADY, JUDITH COLLIER CNTY CONLEY_ WILLIAM & LINDA CONRY TR, TRUDY M CORBETT, JEAN M CORE GORP CRESTO, DIANE M CONY. JULIA F CZAPSKI. ALBINA Z DARRAH, LORIE ❑EAJ REVOCABLE TRUST DEBARBIERI, LAURIE A DEEA LLC DEGAETANO, ROBERT & HEATHER DELDIN, AUSTIN J DENNIS & LINDA RITCHIE DENSMORE, JAMES &JEANNE DEVITA, MICHAEL ❑IORIC, JASON N DOHERTY. DIANE. M DOLORES T CORONA REV TRUST DONNELLY ET AL, JANE ❑ DOROTHY L VERRASTRO REV TRUST DUFF, NATALIE R DUMAS, ROBERTF&THERESAJ DURHAM. THOMAS SHERRILL DURKEE, LINDA C DYCH ES. MARTHA L ELAINE DAMIANI REV TRUST ERRICO. KEITH A & MARIA A F & S HAGSPIEL REV TRUST FERNANDEZ, RUBEN DARIO FERRARA HORVATH, DANA FICHERA, ANNA & FRANK FITZGERALD, JOHN A FLIGG, JAMES EDWARD FOIST, CRAIG FOLEY, CHERYL ANN FORRER, JAMES D &ANNE FRANK, DIANA M FRANKLIN, CATHERINE F FRATTAROLA, THOMASJ FUHRO, BRIAN D & CYNTHIA M FURLONG,ELEANOR FURST BEAN FAMILY TRUST G M & P A WILSON FAMILY TRUST 212 SAN MATEO DRIVE 212 SAN MATEO OR 212 DAN MATEO BR 212 SAN MATEO DRIVE 105 BRIAN BLVD LORETTA ABAMCHEK DOUGLAS B ANDERS 180 VICTORIA DRIVE 2100 J AND C BLVD MARIA CONTRERAS CATHERINE. M BALL 133 RUE CHARLESW OOD 28 ROUTE BE VENCE 2B ROUTE BE VENCE 11 RUE BE COLMAR CONDO ASSN ING 010 STEVE MECKSTROTH % STEVE MECKSTROTH 5881 GOLDEN OAKS LN 15140 PALMER LAKE CIRCLE HELEN F BISSMEYER 4940 COUGAR CT S #104 15188 BUTLER LAKE DRIVE 15157 PALMER LAKE CIRCLE RICHARD A DICAPUA MARIE E BROCCOLI 134184TH ST 958 SPYGLASS LN 15189 BUTLER LAKE DR #102 15117 BUTLER LAKE DR #101 271 ROUTE 45W 15184 BUTLER LAKE DRIVE #203 350E ERIE DRIVE 4965 SANDRA BAY DRIVE #201 15197 BUTLER LAKE BR #201 15181 PALMER LAKE CIR#102 9234 SHADOW OAK LN 8910 TERRENE CT STE 200 8910 TERRENE CT STE 200 8910 TERRENE CT STE 200 8910 TERRENE CT STE 200 2034 MACARTHUR CT 15145 PALMER LAKE CIR #19-202 4970 DEERFIELD WAY #F204 2025 TEAGARDEN LANE CHERYL NOLLEEN CHEGWIBBEN DARLAJ MELUCCI 4975 SANDRA BAY DRIVE #7-203 JOHN COBB 4965 SANDRA BAY DRIVE #203 3166 SANTORINI COURT 15209 BUTLER LAKE DR #201 4010 DEERFIELD WAY 9103 59 KIRTLAND DR MICHAEL J WILSON G/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 1764 COLUMBIA RB UTD 5-19-95 16140 PALMER LAKE CIR#201 16112 CAMMEN LAKES CIR 16144 PALMER LAKE CIR #101 15185 BUTLER LAKE DR #201 64 BRIAR HILL RD 15188 BUTLER LAKE DR #203 7998 HELENA CT 4910 DEERFIELD WAY APT A101 215 WEST TOTH ST APT B 210 FOREST DRIVE 4940 COUGAR COURT SOUTH REVOCABLE LIVING TRUST 4985 SANDRA SAY DR #8-105 GIOVANNA DEVITA 15193 BUTLER LAKE DR 4162 4045 COUGAR CT S #203 211 BARCLAY BLVD 2 CROSSHILL DR 15863 SECOYA RESERVE CIRCLE 4920 DEERFIELD WAY APT 104 39 SHERWOOD DRIVE DARYL BAXiER DURHAM 4965 SANDRA BAY DR #104 4925 SANDRA BAY DRIVE 15177 BUTLER LAKE DR 45 102 470 CHESTNUT STREET 4910 DEERFIELD WAY #201 MARGARITA DIAZ ADAM J HORVATH 2 WINCHESTER WAY PATRICIA L FITZGERALD MARTHA SUSAN FLIGG AUDREY MATULAY MILAINE DE DIEGO 50 WINSIDE LANE 15136 PALMER LAKE CIRCLE #2D2 4960 DEERFIELD WAY D 101 15213 BUTLER LAKE DR #201 2 MISTY RIDGE CIR 15149 PALMER LAKE CIR #101 6508 BARRETT ROAD 38 HIGH ROCK AVE APT 5G NAMEl_ _. NAW4 KAWS NAW0 BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34134-000201005 FOLIO BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34134-0 `G4088288828 BONITA SPRINGS. FL 34134-8537 '24000200624 BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34134-8537 24000200640 BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34134-0 `24000201021 WATERDOWN LOB OCS CANADA '53570000707 15157 PALMER LAKE CIR #102 NAPLES, FL 34109-0 `26144000885 ED26 DEERFIELD BLVD 4108 MASON. OH 45040-0 '26599000656 BRIDGEWATER, NJ 08807-0 'r26144000481 NAPLES, FL 34109-2001 'i70199280003 15161 PALMER LAKE CIRCLE 41-202 NAPLES, FL 34109-0 `25569000089 79 CASTLES BR WAYNE, NJ 07470-0 26144001169 HUDSON JOP 1HO CANADA `26144001622 TOURRETTES/LOUP 06140 FRANCE '24000200404 TOURRETTESILOUP 06140 FRANCE 24000200420 CANNES 06400 FRANCE 2400020060E COO ABILITY MGMT 5736 LONE OAK BLVD NAPLES, FL 34109-6634 `24000200721 212 SAN MATEO DR BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34134-8537 s24006200307 212 SAN MATEO DR BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34134-8537 '24000201348 NAPLES, FL 34119-0 `24000201047 UNIT 27-101 NAPLES. FL 34109-0 '26144001450 15141 PALMER LAKE CIR#201 NAPLES, FL 34109-0 '26144000445 NAPLES, FL 34109-0 240002008B6 #16-201 .NAPLES. FL 34109-0 `26144000209 U N IT 202 NAPLES, FL 34109-0 '26144000940 4910 COUGAR CT N #101 NAPLES, FL 34109-0 '24000200022 9 TABER LN UTICA. NY 13501-0 'S3570000959 BROOKLYN, NY 11228-3Dll 24000200543 NAPLES, FL 34102-7733 `24006201322 NAPLES. FL 34109-0 `25569000607 NAPLES, FL 34109-0 '255590D0348 SUITE H106-107 FAIRFIELD. NJ 07004-0 26144000053 NAPLES. FL 34109-0 `26144000128 ORCHARD LAKE, MI 48324-0 25559000306 NAPLES, FL 34109-0 `24006201128 NAPLES, FL 34109—O `[5569000788 NAPLES, FL 31 2558M00047 NAPLES. FL 34120-0 26144000704 BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34135-0 `25540000024 BONITA SPRINGS, FL 341-15-0 25540000121 BONITA SPRINGS. FL 34136-0 25540000228 BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34135-0 25540001453 DUNEDIN, FL 34698-0 a!4000200909 NAPLES. FL 34109-0 26144000584 NAPLES, FL 34110-0 'S3570000985 NAPLES, FL 34110-0 26144001583 4940 DEERFIELD WAY APT 201 NAPLES_ FL 34110-2308 'S3570000422 4935 SANDRA BAY DR UNIT 103 NAPLES, FL 34109-0 24000200452 NAPLES, FL 34109-0 `24000201364 4925 SANDRA BAY DR 4204 NAPLES, FL 34109-0 24000200381 NAPLES, FL 34109-0 `24000201160 NAPLES, FL 34119—D 753570000626 NAPLES. FL 34109-0 25569001020 NAPLES, FL 34110-0 %3570000066 NAPLES. FL 34110-1314 24000200225 15181 BUTLER LAKE DR#202 NAPLES, FL 34109-0 2556M00487 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE. 101 NAPLES, FL 34112-0 T0199282001 BOSTON, MA 02127-0 26144001046 17121 MARYLAND AVE SOUTH HOLLAND, IL 60473-3449 53570000228 NAPLES, FL 34109-0 26144001625 NAPLES, FL 34110-0 25569000843 NAPLES, FL 34109-0 26144001347 NAPLES, FL 34109-0 2558MO0542 NORWICH, CT 063EO-6427 '113670000163 NAPLES, FL 34109-0 26144000241 AVE MARIA, FL 34142-0 `24000200064 NAPLES, FL 34110-1395 53570000024 NEW YORK, NY 10024-0 %144001282 LINWOOD, NJ 08221-0 'S3570000341 UNIT #5 204 NAPLES, FL 34109-0 24000200983 15152 PALMER LAKE CIRCLE #24101 NAPLES. FL 34109-0 26144001101 NAPLES, FL 34109-0 24000201500 4925 SANDRA BAY DR 42102 NAPLES, FL 34109-0 24060200242 NAPLES, FL 34109-0 255590006B1 NAPLES. FL 34100-0 24000200163 PRINCETON, NJ D8640-0 `25144000788 BO NESS W LOTHIAN EH519JB SCOTLAND 'S35M000147 NAPLES, FL 34110-0 25550000160 NAPLES, FL 34110-1396 'S3570000244 BROCKPORT. NY 14420-0 25569000144 4940 DEERFIELD WAY 4204. NAPLES, FL 34110-0 'S3570000480 NAPLES, FL 34109-0 24DO0201481 NAPLES. FL 34109-0 24000200349 NAPLES, FL 34109-0 25569000364 WASHINGTON TWO. NJ 076701--0 261440006D1 NAPLES, FL 34110-1395 'S3510000105 4975 SANDRA BAY DR #7-103 NAPLES. FL 34109-0 24000201267 2443 POLHEMUS ROAD TOM RIVER, NJ 08753-0 24000201380 WASHINGTONVILLE, NY 1D992-0 24000200527 3230 SPRING RUN BLVD BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34135-0 26144001062 8965 BAY COLONY DR #601 NAPLES, FL 34106-0 26144001127 4910 COUGAR CT N APT 205 NAPLES, FL 34109-2671 24000ZOO200 4985 SANDRA BAY DR #204 NAPLES, FL 34109-0 240#6201584 CORAM, NY 11127-0 25569000720 NAPLES, FL 34109-0 26144OD1664 NAPLES, FL 34110-0 53570000529 NAPLES, FL 34109-0 25569001101 KINNELON, NJ 07405-0 26144000429 NAPLES, FL 34109-0 26144000623 FALLS CHURCH. VA M42- 4203 24000200844 SARATOGA SPRINGS, NY 12866-0 25569001127 O 0 O O N E E 7 N II �i a Packet Pg. 83 9.A.g G IUNTA, GEORGE GORRAN, MARLO TRACY GRATTON, SANDRA LYNNE GRIFFIN, ROSANNE HAVEMBER, KEVIN M HEMRICK, PHILIP F & BARBARA HEN DLER, CAROL A & SAM HERNANDEZ, MARIA HINGORANI, SANJAY HU FMANN.ROSEANNE HORROCKS, KIRK D & KATHLEEN JO HOSKINS, JESSEE HUMPHREY, LINDA L IDA C KOREY RESIDENCE TRUST NGESOULIAN, MARTIN P IZZO_ JOSEPH M JACOBS, STEPHEN C & KUM S JACOBS, STEPHEN C & KUM S JANICE W THOMPSON DEC OF TRUST JAZ AUTOMOTIVE PROPERTIES LLG JEAN T MCENERY REV LIV TRUST JEFFREY K STOLTZNER TRUST JEREMIAS, LAWRENCE JOANNE N SERGEANT REV TRUST JOHN LOOS IRREV TRUST JOSEPH TRIUMBARI INVSTMNT LTD JSF USEPPA WAY CMPII LLC KASE HUD LLC KAUFIELD, SHERRY KBK FAMILY ENTERPRISES LLC KE BZI OR, JANINA KENNEDY, JOSEPH W & ROSEMARIE KN OTT J R,ROBERTJDSEPH KOCHENOU R, CANDICE GA RY ARY & MARY KRELL, SCOTT M & KATHLEEN A KUMIN. GERALD & JUNE LAKEVI EW AT CARLTON LAKES LARSON, JENNIFER L LAVAGGI. AUDREY LAVALLIE. CHRISTHNAA LEEDOM. TRICIA LENN ERT, CDNSTANCEJ LEONARD, JOHN D & SIT RON A LEWANDOWSKI, DAM & SHARON LEWANDOWSKI, DAVID R LEPTON, ARNOLD LIBUNAO, ALLAN J LIN DA LANZETT , REV TRUST LIN DR ERG, ROSALIE S LIU C C I. RO BERTT & CAROLA LIVINGSTON LAKES CONDO ASSN LIVINGSTDN LAKES CONDO ASSN LIVING TON LAKES CONDO ASSN LLERENA, LEIDIANA LOPRESTI. ALICE W NDSBERG, GARY A & JANET L LYNN ELLYN TRUST MACMURDO FAMILY REV LIV TRUST MAGDALENA CASlR0 REV TRUST MAHDI, LAW RENCE & LILY MARCH, WILLIAM L & SANDRA H VARGARETA GARRETT REV TRUST MARK JOHN MCKNIGHT TRUST MARTINEZ, MARIANO & ELISABETH MATAL XHEMAL MATHENEY TR, A GROVER MATHENEY TR, A GROVER MATHENEY TR. A 13ROVER MAXWELL, BETH A MCCULLOUGH, ROBERT HENRY MCGRATH_DONNAJ MCKENZIE, PATRICIA A MCLEOD, WAYNE LEWIS MEIXNER. RAIMUND & IRENE MICELI, ANTON IO MICHAEL P SISAK REV TRUST MIKOLINSKI, LISA MOLAR 1 INVESTMENTS LLC MUMFORD, LARRY & CAROL NAITO. 5HINODA NANCY S COOPER REV TRUST NASHAT INVESTMENTS LLC NEEL, DEBRA J NOCERA, CARL & ARLENE CAKES FARMS INC OCAMPO, JULIO J OCONNOR, CHAD ONEIL, BETHANY A OZSOY, ALP PAL, SAMANTHA E PARENTE, DIANE H & JOHN M PATEL, OSHA PAUL L WESTBROOK REV TRUST PAUL, GEORGE W & BEVERLYA PAYETTE, MAUREEN PEARL RONALD L PENSWICK, MARY F PETRONE, ANTHONY GARY MOTOKO YOST 15209 BUTLER LAKE DR 4101 15140 PALMER LAKE CIR #102 4975 SANDRA BAY DR #102 15148 PALMER LAKE CIR#103 195 SLEEPY HOLLOW ROAD #1295 15213 BUTLER LAKE DR 4102 3344 93RD ST APT 1X PRADIP TANDON CAROLYN MONACO 2431 HEARTH STONE DR PHYLLIS GONZALES HOSKINS 15173 BUTLER LAKE DRIVE 15144 PALMER LAKE GIR#103 MAGDALENE SCHMID 4935 SANDRA BAY DR #203 105 CROSSOVER RD 105 CROSSOVER ROAD 123 WESTCHESTER DRIVE 4250 MORSE CROSSING 10433 LONG AVENUE LAUREL J STOLTZNER TRUST 4950 DEERFIELD WAY 4910 COUGAR CT N #1-102 4755 TAMIAMI TRAIL N 3 MANSWODD CRES PTAJD #8816 4980 TAMIAMI TR N # 201 15137 PALMER LAKE CIR #202 5669 SHORE DR 4975 SANDRA BAY DR #104 300 ASTILBE DR ELIZABETH ANN KNOTT 28900 CAVELL TERRACE 15152 PALMER LAKE CIRCLE 8303 SUMMIT CEDAR LANE 15140 PALMER LAKE CIRCLE #101 COMMOMSASSOCIATION INC 1148 HAMPTON GARDENS LN CARMEN DI DOMENICO 15205 BUTLER LAKE DR #201 J OYCE K LEEDOM 4970 DEERFIELD WAY#F-101 4920 DEERFIELD WAY#201 14322 HIGH ROAD SHARON A LEWANDOWSKI DEANNE PASTOR 220 SCOVILLE AVENUE 15149 PALMER LAKE CIR 4103 15213 BUTLER LAKE DR#101 496D DEERFIELD WAY#104 24301 WALDEN CENTER RD 24301 WALDEN CENTER RD 24301 WALDEN CENTER RD 15209 BUTLER LAKE DR #102 4940 DEERFIELD WAY APT 103 135 S BASSWOOD RD 4960 DEERFIELD WAY E-103 324 KERRY COURT 15189 BUTLER LAKE DR 583 RIDGEWOOD AVE 55 WESTWOOD DRIVE 15137 PALMER LAKE CIRCLE #102 7709 RACHEL WHITNEY LANE 4975 SANDRA BAY DR #101 4940 DEERFIELD WAY#102 LAND TRUSTAGREEMENT LAND TRUST AGREEMENT LAND TRUST ATREEMENT 4950DEERFIELD WAY# D-103 2051 ANGUS COURT WILLIAM P RODNEY 12142 FINGERBOARD RD 4%5 SANDRA BAY DR 4103 MITTELEHRENBACH 201 10980 VANDERBILT DR 15145 PALMER LAKE CIRCLE #101 4985 SANDRA BAY DRIVE #101 SUNSHINE SAND INVESTMENTS LLC 15137 BUTLER LAKE DR 9101 #606 9-7-7 AKASAKA 23 TOWER DR 2141 MANOR HILL DRIVE 15156 PALMER LAKE CIRCLE 15153 PALMER LAKE CIRCLE % FRANCIS A OAKES 4380 SW 160 AVE 15184 BUTLER LAKE DRIVE 9201 TOM S CHMELIK NATALIA N VILLAGRA 15136 PALMER LAKE CIRCLE #201 4338 MAPLE GROVE DR 15137 PALMER LAKE GIR #201 ELIZABETH Y WESTBROOK RV TRUST 15141 PALMER LAKE GIB 4101 DAVID JORDAN CANDICE A MADISON-PEARL ROBERT F PENSWICK SONJA PETRONE 76 NEHOIDEN STREET 3165 ST IVES COUNTRY CLUB PKWY 15196 BUTLER LAKE DR 4102 15165 BUTLER LAKE DR 4102 44 102 15169 BUTLER LAKE DR #201 1445 DENNISON UNIT201 SDI E#11s PO BOX 320099 15173 BUTLER LAKE DR #101 #203 6704 LONE OAK BLVD 15181 BUTLER LAKES DR 4102 4950 DEERFIELD WAY #D102 14322 HIGH RD 4946 COUGAR CT S #206 UT➢ 06129M8 UTD 0902 M8 UT➢ 06/29/B6 PATRICK K MCGRATH 15112 CAMMEN LAKES CIR MINATO #23-103 #21-101 7695 SANTA CRUZ COURT 7528 CORDOBA CIRCLE 1428 BIRDIE DR 15161 PALMER LAKE OR 4101 15137 PALMER LAKE OR #101 1517T BUTLER LAKE DRIVE 15156 PALMER LAKE GIB #101 15157 PALMER LAKE CIR #103 NEEDHAM, MA 02492-0 NAPLES, FL 34109-0 NAPLES, FL 31 NAPLES, FL 34109-0 NAPLES, FL 34109-0 ATHENS, NY 12015-0 NAPLES, FL 34109-0 JACKSON HEIGHTS, NY 11372-1921 ❑UWTH, GA 3009T 2099 NAPLES, FL 34109-0 GRAND LEDGE, MI 48837-0 NAPLES,FL 34109-0 NAPLES, FL 34109-0 NAPLES,FL 34109-0 NAPLES,FL 341OD-0 NAPLES,FL 34109-0 FAIRPORT, NY 1445G-0 FAIRPORT, NY 14550-0 AMHERST, OH 44001-3423 COLUMBUS, OH 43219-0 OAK LAWN, H 501 HOFFMAN ESTATES, H 60159 833 NAPLES, FL 34103-0 NAPLES, FL 34109-0 NAPLES FL 34103-0 BRAMPTON L6T GA3 CANADA ALEXANDRIA, VA 22320-0 NAPLES, FL 34103-0 NAPLES, FL 34109-0 ORCHARD LAKE, MI 48324-0 NAPLES, FL 31 KENNETT SQUARE, PA 19348-1565 NAPLES,FL 34109-0 NAPLES,FL 34119-0 NAPLES, FL 34109-0 LIVERPOOL, NY 13090-0 NAPLES,FL 341D9-0 NAPLES, FL 34109-0 CHARLOTTE, NO 28209-0 NAPLES,FL 34109-0 NAPLES, FL 34109-0 NAPLES. FL 34110-0 NAPLES,FL 34110-2324 NAPLES,FL 34110-0 LOCKPORT, IL 60441-0 LOCKPORT, IL 80441-7448 NAPLES,FL 34109-0 OAK PARK, IL 60302-0 NAPLES, FL 34109-0 NAPLES, FL 34109-0 NAPLES. FL 34110-0 BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34134-0 BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34134-0 BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34134-0 NAPLES. FL 34109-0 NAPLES, FL 34110-2308 LAKE FOREST, IL 60045-6 NAPLES, FL 34110-0 CRANBERRYTWP,PA 16066-0 NAPLES, FL 34109-0 GLEN RIDGE, NJ 07028-0 JOHNSON CITY, NY 13790- 0 NAPLES, FL 34109-0 ALEXANDRIA, VA 22315-0 NAPLES, FL 34109-2684 NAPLES, FL 34110-0 PMB PLY 3977/1601 NW 97TH AVE PO BOX 25207 MIAMI, FL 33102-0 PMB PTY 3977MG01 NW 97TH AVE PO BOX 25207 MIAMI, FL 33102-5207 PMB PLY 3977/1601 NW 97TH AVE PO BOX 25207 MIAMI, FL 25207-0 NAPLES, FL 34110-2305 BURLINGTON L7M 4X9 CANADA 710 HULL COURT MARCO. FL 34145-0 MONROVIA, MG 21770-0 NAPLES, FL 34109-0 LEUTENBACH 91359 GERMANY NAPLES,FL 34108-0 NAPLES,FL 34109-0 NAPLES,FL 34109-0 NAPLES, FL 34110-0 NAPLES,FL 34109-0 TOKYO 1070052 JAPAN NEW PORT. KY 41011-0 MISSISSAUGA L5M SH9 CANADA NAPLES, FL 34109-0 NAPLES, FL 34104-0 NAPLES, FL 34109--0 MIAMI, FL 33185-0 NAPLES, FL 34109-0 NAPLES, FL 34109-0 NAPLES, FL 34120-527 NAPLES, FL 34109-0 ERIE, PA 16510-0 NAPLES,FL 34109-0 NAPLES FL 34109-0 NAPLES, FL 34109-0 NAPLES,FL 34109-0 #5-202 NAPLES, FL 34109-0 NAPLES,FL 34109-0 NAPLES, FL 34109-0 `26144000226 1255690009B2 R26144001486 '24o OU201241 26144001256 '53570000668 `26569001088 S5 570000121 `24000201102 26144000160 '25569006649 '25569000126 '25569000283 26144001389 '25555000225 `24000200559 '25559000186 '25569000429 '53570000684 00198040008 '1151,10011, 'S3570000309 '63570000766 `24000200048 '26144000102 '240002013o6 34595002440 001969260/ 26144000341 25569000924 '240002012B3 '53570000464 '25569000267 25144001068 25144001208 25569000241 '26144001224 25540000765 13ST0000804 25569000445 2SS69000940 03570000545 '53570000846 03570000260 24000200860 '24000200103 24000200B02 '63570000642 26144000%5 '25569001062 '63570000749 00199267006 00199287501 Oo199287705 25569001004 'S3570000383 255690ooB01 T3570000723 25569000863 25569000584 25569000704 25569000762 26144000283 26144001428 24000201225 '63570000367 '34695004082 34S95002026 '34695004040 1351D000561 '53670000927 24001200925 26144001561 24000201063 '24001201123 24000201568 '26144000600 24000201429 25569000821 25569000746 '24000200941 26144000461 26144000607 26144001020 '26144000746 25540000668 '24000200445 26144000089 26144001240 '24000200129 '26144001648 25669000209 26144000322 L5S69000021 26144000380 '26144000267 25569000403 26144000982 26144000909 Na N a_ L V M� W O O to r O O O CD r O N J a O O O N m m E E 7 cn II Li Q Packet Pg. 84 9.A.g HELPS REVOCABLE TRUST NERO, EDELIA ELISA 3TTER, DAVID G JLERI, LAURIE F JARLES, MARISA JOCK, DAVID C & BARBARA E L & PA DELESTOWICZ LV TRUST >MASKEVICIUS. GINTAUTAS >NDY & RENEE BRENON FAM TRUST 1NDY & RENEE BRENON FAM TRUST >NDY & RENEE BRENON FAM TRUST >NDY & RENEE BRENON FAM TRUST >SHBAUM. MINDY >SMUSSEN, LAUREN ANN ADDEAN, MELANIE DDICK, MARY -FERENCE ONLY 6FERENCE ONLY 6FERENCE ONLY -FERENCE ONLY -FERENCE ONLY =113Y. GEORGE F & TONI E 61DY, GEORGE F & TONI E ELLY, NANCYJ 6USS, DONALDA HOMES, ELIZABETHJ SSOLO. WCELLY ]BERTJ DELCO TRUST ]BERT O HAINEY BENEFIT TRUST 3MERO, PATRICIA ENALD A SEKULICH & NANCYJ ]SE, GLADYSJOAN 3SEN. KYLE RICHMAN JBI NOTE, MARK R J IZ, ANTONIO & MARIA A 1NDRA BAY LLC \NGHVI. HINA \THAN_ ANABEL C & AIAN ;HAER, ALFRED E & MARY :HARF, DANIEL E & RENA ❑ :HMIDT, RONALDJ ;HOLES. L CORY HOEMAKER_LORYJ HTERENTAL, ZINAYIDA HUPENIUK LAND TRUST LAR, MARILYN BOYD SK, RON & DEBRA IPAKOFF. DAVID & ROBIN AARGE, STEPHANIE SARANNA AITH_ KEVIN )RRENTINO, LUIGI 'INA, CHRISTOPHERJ & KIM A "ANEK, JOHN EPHEN G MATTHEWS LIV TRUST -EPHENSJR, THOMAS SCOTT EWART JR. DENNIS RAY -OCKWELL, GEORGE M (VEENY, SHARON EJOHNSTON NEETIN, DENNIS R ,LLEY, ROBERT M & MARGARETA iRANTINO, JASON S �RULLO. NANCY IOMAS E BRIGHAM TRUST IOMAS S NAREKIAN TRUST IOMAS TR, NICHOLAS S OMSON, JOHN & ROSLYNE TF lDOT IST OF FL 'KA, DONALD A & MARIA L 'PMANN, GERD & URSULA )RRENS, NAILA )WER. KATHERI NE C uwNERG, EZIO E & K E GUSTAFSON REV TRUST 3LA, ANITA CKERS_ JAMES A & SUSAN J LLAFAN. ERIKA A.LKER, DANIEL O & JILLA A.LKER, KELLY E & ELIZABETH A ELLS, MONA EST FLORIDA COMMUNITY 'ETTELS, ELAINE FRANCES PICKER, MARK S & TERESA K ILLIAM C SCHERER TR U ST ILLIAMS, RHYS T & GERILYN NDSONG CLUB APTS LLC 'ISE, JENNIFER R ITTHAUER, PAUL W 13167 POND APPLE BR E 27812 ADRIANA CIR #101 272 GLEN EAGLE CIR 16167 PALMER LAKE CIR #201 15169 BUTLER LAKE DR #201 1625 SPRUCE ST 10807 CANTERBURY DR 1242 SW 4TH CT 6978 HIDDEN OAK DRIVE 6978 HIDDEN OAK DRIVE 6978 HIDDEN OAK DRIVE 6978 HIDDEN OAK DRIVE TRACY E LEONARD OLAF JAMES RASMUSSEN PHILIP RANKIN 4910 DEERFIELD WAY #A102 BERMUDA PALMS A CONDOMINIUM CARRIAGE HOMES AT LIVINGSTON COACH HOMES AT LIVINGSTON LAKEVIEW I AT CARLTON LAKEVIEW 11 AT CARLTON 15186 BUTLER LAKE DR #103 15188 BUTLER LAKE DR #103 16166 PALMER LAKE CIRCLE 9102 CAROL A FELDHAUS 16144 PALMER LAKE CIRCLE 60 FAWN RIDGE LN 11642 UPPER PENINSULA PLACE 15144 PALMER LAKE CIR #201 4%5 SANDRA BAY DR #202 SEKULICH LIVING TRUST 14 SULTANA STREET 316 CYPRESS WAY W SALLY A RUBINOFF 27775 BEN OAKS DR 2553 W 118TH TERRACE 15145 PALMER LAKE CIR #201 4946 COUGAR CT S #106 15149 PALMER CIR 420-201 506 DAWES AVE 316 SAINT FRANCOIS ST 13RENDA REEVE 15149 PALMER LAKE CIRCLE LEON KAYSER 4910 COUGAR CT N APT 203 15184 BUTLER LAKE DR #101 15206 BUTLER LAKE DRIVE #202 706 HILLSVIEW DRIVE 11373 CHAMPIONSHIP DR LUCY RIOLINO 80 SAINT ANDREW RD 9220 BONITA BEACH RD SE # 114 KELLY STANEK 15 MARIANO DRIVE 4985 SANDRA BAY DR 48 25 VENESA STEWART SANDRA K STOCKWELL 19 CHOIR LN 4985 SANDRA BAY DR # 8-202 15113 BUTLER LAKE DRIVE 15153 PALMER LAKE FIR 4202 PO BOX 97 P O BOX 560 28413 VERDE LANE SUSAN ATHOMAS TR FAIRVIEW OF CRAIGIE PO BOX 1249 2000 KING JAMES PARKWAY 9127 MATTHAEUSSTR 50 15161 PALMER LAKE CIR #201 FORREST RTOWER 59 ANNIE CRAIG DRIVE 92604 54631 BELLINGHAM DR 67 FRANKLIN ST 15153 PALMER LAKE CIRCLE 4965 SANDRA BAY DR 4201 1993 ILER STREET S 15185 BUTLER LAKE DRIVE MATTHEW WELLS RENTALS LLC ROBERT G SIRICO 1513T PALMER LAKE CIR # 203 % EXCEL REAL ESTATE 137 SELMA BLVD 470618TH AVE 15144 PALMER LAKE CIR 9203 LYNNETTE N WITTHAUER 356 CHRISTY ROAD 15140 PALM ER LAKE CID #202 CAROLYN SHOFFACKER 4041 GULF SHORE BLVD N #1004 15184 BUTLER LAKE DR #102 JANET KURNICK ZIEGLER NAPLES, FL 34119-0 BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34135-0 NAPLES, FL 34104-5715 NAPLES, FL 34109-0 NAPLES, FL 34109-0 TRENTON, NJ 08610-2230 MOKENA, IL 50448-1086 CAPE CORAL, FL 33991-0 LOCKPORT. NY 14094-0 LOCKPORT. NY 14094-7934 LOCKPORT NY 140%-7934 LOCKPORT. NY 140%-7934 15136 PALMER LAKE CIR #102 #102 NAPLES, FL 34109-0 4935 SANDRA BAY DRIVE 43-204 NAPLES, FL 34109-0 1454 CARNOUSTIE CIR GROVE CITY, OH 43123-0 NAPLES, FL 34110-1395 LAKES CONDOMINIUM LAKES A CONDOMINIUM LAKES CONDOMINIUM LAKES A CONDOMINIUM NAPLES, FL 34109-0 NAPLES, FL 34109-0 NAPLES, FL 34109-904T 15181 BUTLER LAKE DRIVE #6-201 NAPLES, FL 34109-0 #2-102 NAPLES, FL 34109-8 NORWALK, CT 05851-1137 SAINT JOHN, IN 46373-0 NAPLES, FL 34109-8 NAPLES, FL 34109-8 4940 DEERFIELD WAY #104 NAPLES, FL 34110-2308 SARATOGA SPRINGS, NY 12866-0 NAPLES FL 34110- 0 4950 DEERFIELD WAY D201 NAPLES, FL 34110-2306 MECHANICSVILLE, MD 20659-0 LEAWOOD, KS 56211-3041 NAPLES, FL 34109-0 NAPLES, FL 34109-0 NAPLES FL 34109-0 UTICA, NY 13502-0 FLORISSANT. MO 53031-5016 59 ELODIA COURT HAMILTON LOS 7R2 CANADA #20-203 NAPLES, FL 3411T 0 30223 VIEWCREST COURT NOVI_ MI 48377-0 NAPLES. FL 34109-2671 NAPLES, FL 34109-0 NAPLES, FL 34109-0 COLLEGEVILLE, PA 19426-0 FORT MYERS, FL 33913-0 4319 NIAGRA RIVER PARKWAY STEVENSVILLE LOS 1S0 CANADA BOSTON, MA 02128-1224 BONITA SPRINGS, FL 341h-4231 4945 COUGAR CT S #103 NAPLES, FL 34109-2675 READING, MA 01867-0 NAPLES, FL 34109-0 3029 WOLF LAKE BLVD NEW ALBANY, IN 47150-0 57 BENNETTS BRIDGE RD SANDY HOOK, CT 06482-1440 WESTBURY, NY 11590-0 NAPLES, FL 34109-2666 #4-202 NAPLES, FL 34109-0 NAPLES, FL 34109-9043 SHIP BOTTOM, NJ 08008-0 CHAMPAIGN, IT 61824-0 BONITA SPRINGS. FL 34136-0 N7955 THOMAS LN CRIVITZ, WI 54114-9019 WHITECAIRNS AB238XE UNITED KINGDOM TALLAHASSEE, FL 32399-3000 WESTLAKE, OH 44145-0 MUELHEIM KAERLIC 56218 GERMANY NAPLES, FL 34109-0 1322 S WABASH #409 CHICAGO. IL 60605-0 ETOBICOKE MBV OC4 CANADA SHELBY TOWNSHIP. MI 48316-1299 BRAINTREE, MA 02184-0 421-203 NAPLES, FL 34109-0 NAPLES, FL 34109-2686 SALEM.OR 97302-0 47-102 NAPLES, FL 34109-0 3600 LAKEMONT DR BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34134-0 30593 HICKORY LN FRANKLIN. MI 46025-0 15141 PALMER LAKE CIR #102 NAPLES, FL 34109-9041 NAPLES, FL 34109-0 2375 N TAMIAMI TRL 9206 NAPLES, FL 34103-0 RANDOLPH, NJ 07869-0 BROOKLYN, NY 11204-0 NAPLES, FL 34109-0 3020 83 112 AVE SE JAMESTOWN, N❑ 58401-0 EIGHTY FOUR, PA 15330-0 NAPLES, FL 34109-0 15185 BUTLER LAKE DR #101 NAPLES, FL 34109-9030 NAPLES, FL 34103-0 NAPLES,FL 31 23382 PORTAGE WAY #2107 NOVI, MI 48375-0 26144001660 24000200365 24000201089 26144000924 25559000623 24000201445 53570000820 24000201209 24000200967 24000200662 24000200789 24000201186 25144001606 24009200666 '53570000943 53570000040 00199282904 00199285008 00199284009 25540000761 25540000604 '25144000144 26144000186 26144001004 25559000461 26144000649 24000200747 25589000102 25144001402 2400020114d '53570000406 25569001046 03570000448 53570000600 26144001185 24000201461 26144000568 24000200706 26144000661 53570000262 24000200187 '53510000325 26144000720 26144001363 F24000200161 26144000021 25569000966 25559000360 240D0200486 24000201403 24000200268 24000200264 24000200666 53570000888 24000201607 25144000306 S3570000169 26144000762 24000201642 25559000322 25144000827 53570000862 25144000526 24000200080 53570000082 25144001321 0019860000E 26144000542 25144001143 25569000053 26144000869 25569000885 53570000781 24000200501 26144000843 24000201526 26144001509 25569000528 26144000966 24000200145 28144000403 26144000364 00198000006 25569000908 00197960008 26144001444 26144001305 T3570000286 26144001541 25569000500 2556900056E 261"000047 53570000901 NaN LPL N d E L m Q. a_ m O V m O O to r O O O CD r O N J IL O O O N m m E E 7 N II �i Q Packet Pg. 85 9.A.g 0 a w U) c m E a Q L 0 U a� m 0 0 w r 0 0 0 rn r 0 N J d 0 CD 0 0 N f� fC E E 7 ii U Q Packet Pg. 86 9.A.g August 25th, 2020 at 6:00 PM New Hope Ministries7675 Davis Blvd, Naples, FL Name I Address pg. 2 Packet Pg. 87 9.A.g Name Address pg. 3 0 a N r C N a 0 c� m m 0 0 to 0 0 0 rn 0 N J a 0 rn 0 0 N cC E E 7 N i. Ci a Packet Pg. 88 9.A.g Name Address pg. 4 0 a N r C N a 0 c� m m 0 0 to 0 0 0 rn 0 N J a 0 rn 0 0 N cC E E 7 N i. Ci a Packet Pg. 89 Immokalee Road Interchange Residential Infill Subdistrict "4t a.k.a. BLUE CORAL A P A R T M E N T S r 0 Proiect Background: The subject property is approximately 9.35 acres of undeveloped agricultural zoned land located on the south side of Immokalee Road, just west of Juliet Boulevard and east of Livingston Road.Zoning for the property to the west is a residential PUD, the property to the South is the LivingstonLakes Residential PUD, the land to the North is the Immokalee road right of way and the propertyto the east is currently undergoing GMPA/PUD rezone that would propose a luxury automotive dealership. k T:77 '? w . - = • '��" �ti. 'µsr '�'S� ,�:, -. •� i .�. y�,`� - �.yE„ �r y� � � .�_ •c� a� "� � ,„_� ��.�"-'��n�_ �h'rd.'°��5.��`�_, ', �A ��RR�.*If�C'w�F �: The subject property lies within the Urban Mixed Use District, Urban Residential Subdistrict and is within the Immokalee Interchange Activity Center Density Band The current zoningforthe property is agricultural zoningand currently qualifies to be rezoned to residential. Request: The purpose of thisapplication is to amend the Growth Management Plan (GMP) to establish the Immokalee Interchange Residential Infill Subdistrict. This subdistrict is intended to allow a higher density multi -family rental development that is consistent and compatible with and complementary to the Interchange Activity Center Subdistrict and advances Housing and Transportation goals, objectives and policies outlined the Growth Management Plan. Moreover, the proposed subdistrict is consistent with and implements numerous recommendations of the ULI Advisory Services Panel Report on Expanding Housing Affordability in Collier County. 4/2/21 Immokalee Road Interchange Residential Infill Subdistrict - 2 - The proposed subdistrict will accommodate the development of an urban -style luxury rental community that will offer studio, one bedroom, two bedroom and three bedroom residences. This project will be required to go through the Planned Unit Development (PUDZ) rezoning process to obtain approval. The proposed project is in an ideal location for increased density. It is along a major thoroughfare, in close proximity to the Immokalee 175 interchange, and almost immediately abutting Mixed Use Activity Center #4, which is home to a mix of uses and significant commercial intensity. The resulting project will provide an excellent transition from the high intensity commercial use proposed on the property directly east of the subject property and the residential condominiums directly west of the subject property. r a _ti = r* �r M. o2 - J _ J 410 -� 4/2/21 Immokalee Road Interchange Residential Infill Subdistrict - 3 - PROJECT NARRATIVE & EXPLANATION/JUSTIFICATION OF GMPA Reauest Protect Description: The proposed Blue Coral multi -family residential development will bring a much needed residential product to the market serving the Northwest Collier County sub -market. The development will include 280living units in a highly amenitized urban style community that will respond to the needsof the Collier County workforce that currently commutes from more affordable residential areas totheir jobs in the County. By design, the development will incorporate unitsthat are smaller in square footage to create workforce affordability. The Developer will work with the Collier County Housing Authority to create subsidies to allow a percentage of units to be affordable to residents making less than 80%; 80% to 90%; and 90%-100% of the average median income. Developer is proposing to offer twenty-five percent (25%) or 70 of the total units to be rented to Essential Service Personnel, of which 35 will be households earning between <80-100% of the Adjusted Median Income (AMI) for Collier County. Preference for these units will be given to Essential Service Personnel (ESP). These are individuals or families where at least one of whom is employed as police or fire personnel, a childcare worker, a teacher or other educational personnel, health care personnel, a public employee, or a service worker. These "affordable units" will be offered for a period of 30 years after completion of construction. 4/2/21 Immokalee Road Interchange Residential Infill Subdistrict - 4 - To assist in creating affordability, we are proposing a density of 30 units per acre. While this density is higher than permitted under the existing Growth Management Plan, this density is standard in manyother Florida markets and is significantly lower than densities permitted in Sarasota, Ft. Lauderdale, Miami and Tampa. More importantly, higher density is appropriate when a project is adjacent to or in close proximity to an interstatehighway and on a major thoroughfare. Traditional thinking suggests that this type of densitycreates a burden on highways and infrastructure, but the reality is that these "urban type" developments actually reduce the numbers of tripsmade on a daily basis. Additionally, this location provides walkability to a variety of commercialestablishments, not the least of which is the newly opened Seed to Table grocery and lifestyle market. The proposed development incorporates a significant number of smaller units (studios and one bedroom units) ranging from 550 square feet up to approximately 750 square feet. Based onthe smaller size of these units, the gross rent is less, thus providing greater affordability. With the documented influx of younger workers and two income families into southwest Florida, this more urban development located adjacent toan activity center and in walking distance to essential services makes perfect sense. Much of the current roadway congestion results from workers employed in Collier County having to commute to other areas to find quality housing with full amenity packages at a reasonable price. Many of these workers are commuting from Estero, Ft. Myers and Cape Coral because they cannot find any affordability in the Collier County area. 'Jill ZY goo r -� r� � 'r Ar PWr . ' I '" L{ eY 4/2/21 Immokalee Road Interchange Residential Infill Subdistrict - 5 - The proposed development will offer a rangeof amenities, both in the living units and in community spaces. Every unit in the developmentwill include stainless steel appliance packages, granite or quartz countertops, vinyl wood plank flooring, washers and dryers, walk in closets, designer lighting and cabinetry, nine -foot ceilings, upscale bathroom finishes, patios or balconies inselect units and cell phone app control of basic home functions. Amenity use by residents will notrequire any additional parking than what is required for the residential units. Access and use of the community facilities is private for residents and their guests only. Other than the leasing office, the proposed development will not require any additional parking spaces beyond the de- mand that from residents. All residents in the community will enjoy development amenities. Some of these will include the following: two saltwater swimming pools, Jacuzzi, an expansive club room with TV's and entertainment stations and a community kitchen, game room, golf simulator, business center with computers and printer, fitness center with aerobic equipment and free weights, a pet grooming spaand dog park, covered parking, electric vehicle charging stations, and an outdoor grilling area and kitchen. This amenity package will encourage residents to spend more time at the community, encourage walking to nearby services and vendors, and generally reduce the amount of automobile traffic in the immediate vicinity of the development. This higher density development will utilize the nearby areas of commerce, which is the antithesis of historical urban sprawl. r old t 4/2/21 Immokalee Road Interchange Residential Infill Subdistrict - 6 - Justification: The proposed Immokalee Interchange Residential Infill Subdistrict and the proposed higher density is appropriate for the area and can be justified for the following reasons: Appropriate Location The proposed location is in the urban area, in close proximity to a major Interchange Activity Center, in a density band, along a major transportation corridor, and close to public transit. The proposed subdistrict and the proposed car dealership east of the subject property represent a natural extension of Activity Center 4. As stated in the Affordable Housing LDC Amendments that will soon go to public hearing, Activity Centers in the Urban District are areas where the greatest densities and intensities are anticipated. This location represents areas where the transportation system and public infrastructure are available. Moreover, those areas are mixed -use nodes that encourage and support higher densities since they provide goods, services and entertainment in close proximity to the residential units. These nodes encourage transit and through proper interconnection also promote and support bicycle and pedestrian modes of transportation. Page 27 of the ULI report recommends to "Target Certain Activity Centers for Significantly Higher Density with the Provision of Mixed -Income Housing." Further, page 26 of the report states that, "Although difficult to develop, projects in the urban areas of the county can yield great benefits by placing residents near existing transit, employment, shopping, and other daily needs and by reducing strain on existing infrastructure." Infill Project The proposed subdistrict and companion Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) represents an infill project for which the Growth Management Plan allows a density bonus recognizing that smaller lots can be challenging to develop and that infilling appropriate areas provide benefits from an urbanization, public infrastructure, transportation standpoint. Additionally, the proposed subdistrict sits between the proposed car dealership and commercial uses to the east and multi -family residential to the south. This infill project provides a favorable land use intensity transition from the more intense commercial uses to the less intense residential communities. As stated on page 25 of the ULI report, "...infill sites in already developed areas of the county are challenging to consolidate, may need to address adjacent uses and neighborhood concerns, and often require additional density to make the financially feasible." The subdistrict will limit future development to residential multi -family only and will provide assurance that more intense commercial uses will not be developed on the property that abuts existing multi -family to the south. The PUD will also include setback, buffering height limits and landscaping that will ensure compatibility with adjacent properties. 4/2/21 Immokalee Road Interchange Residential Infill Subdistrict - 7 - Affordable Housing Commitment The proposed density of 30 units per acre is consistent with ULI's Report on Expanding Housing Affordability in Collier County published in 2017. Page 27 of the report recommends strengthening the Affordable Housing Density Bonus (AHDB) Program as a means of making it financially feasible for market rate developers to provide affordable housing in site. "...the number of residential units allowed per acre should be significantly increased. For example, 30 units per acre may be a more realistic maximum density to properly incentivize market rate developers to provide affordable housing." The proposed subdistrict provides a clear commitment to provide affordable housing for 30 years and preference to Essential Service Personnel, which is consistent with the ULI report that emphasizes the need to provide housing affordability for Collier County's workforce in order to have a sustainable economy and great quality of life. As stated on page 8 of the report, "housing affordability affects all segments of the community..." and on page 18, "Local employers will continue to have difficulty hiring and retaining employees in the county, which will create a "brain drain" out of the community...." Moreover, the ULI report sees an overwhelming need for affordable rental units, which is mandated by this subdistrict. The report also explains how providing "multifamily rental housing is the most cost-effective way to provide housing that is affordable to the average working person" and as such, recommends greater densities as an incentives to the development community. Transportation Benefits The proposed subdistrict provides the benefit of locating higher densities in close proximity to employment centers, shopping and entertainment, which is consistent with sound planning and transportation practices. This land use pattern supports and promotes transit, bicycle and pedestrian modes of transportation. 600 NCH NORTH NAPLES Piper Blvd ® an Ca cocuER AREa,AaNs�, Immokalee Rd F O© Immokalee Rd Creekside IT a� 73 m W a Y Q C ® Y LL d a p ® rn Q c N 0 ¢ N 0 a J Vanderbilt Beach Road 5 0 4/2/21 Immokalee Road Interchange Residential Infill Subdistrict - 8 - The ULI report (pg 16) also explains that "Crucial to the cost -burden conversation is the combination of housing cost and transportation cost." As people have to "drive to qualify', we create a pattern in which we increase vehicle miles travelled, tax the existing infrastructure and erode our quality of life. In addition to these benefits of increased density in the right locations, the proposed subdistrict will provide very important site -specific improvements that will benefit the existing transportation system, roadway safety and reduce trips on Immokalee Road. FUTURE ACCESS l ♦WWFUTURE ��i♦��1 ACCESS\\�l Y Y r r 4/2/21 Immokalee Road Interchange Residential Infill Subdistrict - 9 - As depicted on the two exhibits above, the project will provide a joint access with the adjacent property to the east, reducing access points along Immokalee Road, reducing potential conflicts and improving safety conditions. Moreover, the project in collaboration with the property to the east, will create a "frontage road" that will allow connection to the Activity Center uses, the Walmart Superstore and the transit stop at that location. The project will also provide a potential interconnection to Bermuda Palms should that community want the connection. The frontage road will reduce trips onto Immokalee Road and will enable bicycle and pedestrian access to the commercial uses within the Activity Center. Urban Density As we know, Collier County is expected to grow significantly in population by 2040. Collier county with its outstanding quality of life will continue to attract in -migration and annual visitors. The current COVID-19 pandemic has most likely accelerated that growth. In order to meet the County's housing needs and to minimize sprawl, the county has made it a priority to accommodate growth in the urban areas. Urban densities in the right locations, as proposed for this subdistrict, creates numerous benefits described above. In addition to housing, transportation, affordability, transit, quality of life and sprawl benefits, it is important to note that increased density can be achieved in a form that is attractive and compatible with adjacent uses. 4/2/21 Immokalee Road Interchange Residential Infill Subdistrict - 10 - The ULI report (pg 21) points to "examples of this type of increased density include Bayfront and Naples Square, at more than 20-30 units per acre rather than the average 2.5 units per acre in other residential communities." There are numerous examples of recent, attractive and desirable multi -family projects where the density on net acre basis far exceeds the county's current 16 du/ac limitation. Some of these include Magnolia Square that has 290 units on approximately 10.5 acres for a density of 27.5 du/ac; One Naples which was recently approved for approximately 26 du/ac, Addies Corner with a net density of approximately 24 du/ac; Vanderbilt Way with 48 units on 2.5 acres for a density of 19.2 du/ac; and Orchid Run with 281 units on 16,19 net acres for density of 17.4 du/ac. These projects demonstrate that higher density has a place in Collier County and can be compatible, attractive and successful when done at human scale and located in appropriate areas. Similar to the proposed project, the examples above are typically 4-stories in height and located within a mixed -use project or in vicinity to a complementary commercial node. The following photos of the Orchid Run project demonstrates how a higher density project can be attractive and consistent with the community character and the level of quality expected in Collier County. The photos below also demonstrate that people do not experience and react to form and not density figures. If the form is right people will like a project and enjoy their interaction with the built environments 4/2/21 Immokalee Road Interchange Residential Infill Subdistrict - 11 - Site Design/Setbacks/Buffers In addition to the aesthetics of the proposed project, careful attention was paid to the location of the building onsite, the scale of the building, the landscaping, the amenities provided and the setbacks and buffering from adjacent properties. These items are addressed in detail as part of the companion PUDZ application, however the following exhibits below address these compatibility issues. As can be seen from the height and massing exhibit, the proposed apartments provide a natural transition from the commercial uses to the east and provide significant separation from Bermuda Palms to mitigate for the height differential. The setback exhibit shows that the proposed project far exceeds standard setback requirements. The proposed building was designed and located on the site in such a way as to mitigate the height differential with Bermuda Palms and to ensure compatibility. The building is articulated and provides 2 large courtyards to break up the massing and to provide landscaped areas facing Bermuda Palms. The actual building height including any parapet wall will not exceed 55 feetfrom grade. The parking garage, which is built-in the overall structure will be two levels and will not exceed 30 feet from grade. At its closest, the proposed structure is approximately 84' from the western property boundary and approximately 190' from the neighboring residences. The Collier County LDC acknowledges that potential compatibility challenges can arise between different uses and requires mandatory setbacks and buffering between uses. The Collier LDC requires 50' setbacks from Industrial PUDs to residential zoning districts (Sec 4.07.03), and per Site Design Standards in Sec 4.02.01, standard Industrial zoning districts only require 50' setbacks from residential uses. Moreover, noisy or "impactful" uses such as Car Washes only require 50' setbacks from abutting residential. To the south of the property the proposed apartments are approximately 180' form the property line, where most of this area is a densely vegetated preserve with pines measuring up to 65'. The closest Livingston Lakes residences are over 272' from the proposed structure. Lastly, the project exceeds buffer requirement on the two sides that it abuts residential uses. The code requires 10' Type A buffers where residential multi -family uses abut each other. Along the western boundary a 15' Type B buffer is proposed and as mentioned above a wide, densely -vegetated preserve is proposed along the south. Height and Massing Comparison Exhibit Y: 41E MARRI0'T 60 70' 1UC' - WALf.1ART VERIZON 25' - CHASE a rt as' VACANr BLUE CORAL '- - IULIEI BLV'CARWAEH LAND 9ERMUOA PALMS 4/2/21 Immokalee Road Interchange Residential Infill Subdistrict - 12 - Line of Sight — Southern Boundary TRACT B 1 ..i�i!%slws!i coo TL IIIIIIIII CORAL APART x et i Line of Sight — Northern Boundary so= R R —MM u RscnPeo 6Wf CORAL APARTMENTS 1ES1 MOYJrLff ROW 100'CANALfASfMfM 60'BIIFFfR 91'i IAKES _ S= _ 7 A .. TweEo•- - Ex raps RJ REEs G � o 4/2/21 Immokalee Road Interchange Residential Infill Subdistrict - 14 - CONSISTENCY WITH THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT, ULi's HOUSING AFFORDABILITY RECOMMENDATIONS AND PROPOSED HOUSING AFFORDABILITY LDC AMENDMENTS: The proposed subdistrict is consistent with the Growth Management Plan, ULI's Housing Affordability Recommendations and proposed Housing Affordability LDC amendments in that it complies with or implements the intent of these documents. In summary, the Immokalee Interchange Infill Residential Subdistrict is compliant and consistent with the aforementioned documents and request higher density for the following reasons: 1. It implements housing affordability recommendations from ULI and provides affordable housing for a period of 30 years. 2. It offers a project that provides rental units and diversifies Collier County's housing stock. 3. It proposes higher density in a location adjacent to a Mixed-Use/Interchange Activity Center, which is an area designated to allow the highest densities and intensities in the County. 4. It proposes higher density on an infill parcel that will serve as a transition from more intense commercial uses to lower intensity multi -family residential communities. 5. It proposes higher density along a major transit corridor and in very close proximity to two major transit stops (North Collier Regional Park and the Immokalee Walmart Supercenter) 6. It proposes joint access with the adjacent planned automobile dealership thus limiting access points along Immokalee Road, and improving traffic and safety conditions. 7. It allows the development of a "frontage road" with interconnection among projects and direct access to the Walmart Commercial plaza thereby reducing trips onto Immokalee Road and Vehicle Miles Traveled. 8. It is consistent with Transit Oriented Development principles and encourages bicycle and pedestrian modes for local convenience shopping. 9. It proposes higher density to help mitigate Collier County's high costs of land, impact fees and regulatory approvals, as well as the rapidly escalating material and construction costs. 10. It proposes a project that must go through the public hearing process and must demonstrate compatibility through PUD process. 11. It requires an affordable housing commitment for a period of 30 years, and requires it to be memorialized via a Developer Agreement, PUD Developer Commitments or rezoning conditions of approval. 12. It provides a quality project that must demonstrate the demand for proposed housing product through a market study. 13. It provides an attractive human -scale multi -family community that provides appealing architecture, amenities and landscaping since people experience form not density. The proposed density on a net acreage is consistent with several desirable multi -family projects in Collier County. 4/2/21 Immokalee Road Interchange Residential Infill Subdistrict - 15 - Growth Management Plan Consistency: The following excerpts demonstrates consistency with the concepts principles, goals objectives and policies in the Growth Management Plan. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) The Overview explains the intent and concepts behind the land use regulations and the allocation of development to certain areas of the County. An overarching theme is "to protect and manage natural resource systems" by directing growth to urban designated areas stated as follows: Urban Designated Areas on the Future Land Use Map are located and configured to guide concentrated population growth and intensive land development away from areas of great sensitivity and toward areas more tolerant to development. Furthermore, the FLUE establishes the Use of Activities Centers as a means of concentrating future development in appropriate urban areas that help minimize urban sprawl and promote an efficient use of public infrastructure as stated below: The Mixed Use Activity Centers are intended to provide for concentrated commercial and mixed use development but with carefully configured access to the road network. Superior urban design is therefore promoted by carefully managing road access, avoiding strip commercial development, improving overall circulation patterns, and providing for community focal points. Policy 4.7: Access Management Plan provisions have been developed for Mixed Use and Interchange Activity Centers designated on the Future Land Use Map and these provisions have been incorporated into the Collier County Land Development Code. The intent of the Access Management Plan provisions is defined by the following guidelines and principles: a. The number of ingress and egress points shall be minimized and shall be combined and signalized to the maximum extent possible. b. Spacing of access points shall meet, to the maximum extent possible, the standards set forth in the Collier County Access Control Policy (Resolution No. 01-247, adopted June 26, 2001). c. Access points and turning movements shall be located and designed to minimize interference with the operation of existing and planned interchanges and intersections. d. Developers of lots, parcels, and subdivisions shall be encouraged to dedicate crossaccess easements, rights -of -way, and limited access easements, as necessary and appropriate, in order to ensure compliance with the above -mentioned standards (a. — c.) Objective 5: Implement land use policies that promote sound planning, protect environmentally sensitive lands and habitat for listed species while protecting private property rights, ensure compatibility of land uses and further the implementation of the Future Land Use Element. Policy 5.5: Discourage unacceptable levels of urban sprawl in order to minimize the cost of community facilities by: confining urban intensity development to areas designated as Urban on the Future Land Use Map .... 4/2/21 Immokalee Road Interchange Residential Infill Subdistrict - 16 - OBJECTIVE 7: Promote smart growth policies, reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and adhere to the existing development character of the Collier County, where applicable, and as follows: Policy 7. 1: The County shall encourage developers and property owners to connect their properties to fronting collector and arterial roads, except where no such connection can be made without violating intersection spacing requirements of the Land Development Code. Policy 7.3: All new and existing developments shall be encouraged to connect their local streets and/or interconnection points with adjoining neighborhoods or other developments regardless of land use type. The interconnection of local streets between developments is also addressed in Policy 9.3 of the Transportation Element. Policy 7.4: The County shall encourage new developments to provide walkable communities with a blend of densities, common open spaces, civic facilities and a range of housing prices and types. Housing Element GOAL 1: TO CREATE AN ADEQUATE SUPPLY OF DECENT, SAFE, SANITARY, AND AFFORDABLE HOUSING FOR ALL RESIDENTS OF COLLIER COUNTY. OBJECTIVE 1: Provide new affordable housing units in order to meet the current and future housing needs of legal residents with very -low, low, moderate and affordable workforce incomes, including households with special needs such as rural and farmworker housing in rural Collier County OBJECTIVE 2: Increase the number of affordable housing units, by the methods contained in Objective 1 and subsequent Policies, for very -low, low, moderate and affordable workforce income residents with the assistance of for -profit and not -for -profit providers of affordable housing, within the County and its municipalities Policy 2.2: Partnerships shall be encouraged between private developers, non-profit entities, local governments and other interested parties to ensure the development of housing that meets the needs of the County's very - low, low, moderate and affordable workforce income residents. Policy 2.4: The County shall, with the City of Naples, continue to review existing codes and ordinances and amend them as needed to allow for flexible and innovative residential design that encourages mixed use development with a variety of housing designs, styles, and price ranges. Transportation Element OBJECTIVE 7: Develop and adopt standards for safe and efficient ingress and egress to adjoining properties, and encourage safe and convenient on -site traffic circulation through the development review process. Policy 9.3: The County shall require, wherever feasible, the interconnection of local streets between developments to facilitate convenient movement throughout the road network. The LDC shall identify the circumstances and conditions that would require the interconnection of neighboring developments, and shall also develop standards 4/2/21 Immokalee Road Interchange Residential Infill Subdistrict - 17 - and criteria for the safe interconnection of such local streets. OBJECTIVE 12: Encourage the efficient use of transit services now and in the future. 4/2/21 Immokalee Road Interchange Residential Infill Subdistrict - 18 - Coder County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT MM.colliergoy.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Application for a Public Hearing for PUD Rezone, Amendment to PUD or PUD to PUD Rezone PETITION NO PROJECT NAME To be completed by staff DATE PROCESSED ❑� PUD Rezone (PUDZ): LDC subsection 10.02.13 A.-F., Ch. 3 G. 1 of the Administrative Code ❑ Amendment to PUD (PUDA): LDC subsection 10.02.13 E. and Ch. 3 G. 2 of the Administrative Code ❑ PUD to PUD Rezone (PUDR): LDC subsection 10.02.13 A.-F. Name of Property Owner(s): APPLICANT CONTACT INFORMATION William C Scherer Trust c/o Excel Real Estate Name of Applicant if different than owner: CIG Naples, LLC. Address: 226 East 8th St. City: Cincinnati State: OH Telephone: (513)246-1985 Cell: (513)659-6181 E-Mail Address: gregg.fusaro@cigproperties.com Name of Agent: Tom Barber Firm: Agnoli, Barber & Brundage Inc. Address: 7400 Trail Blvd Suite 200 Telephone: (239)597-3111 Cell: City: Naples E-Mail Address: tom.barber@abbinc.com ZIP: 45202 Fax. (513) 241-9390 State: FL ZIP: 34108 Fax: (239)254-2839 Be aware that Collier County has lobbyist regulations. Guide yourself accordingly and ensure that you are in compliance with these regulations. February 1, 2019 Page 1 of 11 Coder County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239)252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 REZONE REQUEST This application is requesting a rezone from: Agd-ftwal Zoning district(s) to the PUD zoning district(s). Present Use of the Property: Vacant Proposed Use (or range of uses) of the property: Residential Original PUD Name: Ordinance No.: N/A N/A PROPERTY INFORMATION On a separate sheet attached to the application, provide a detailed legal description of the property covered by the application: • If the request involves changes to more than one zoning district, the applicant shall include a separate legal description for property involved in each district; • The applicant shall submit 4 copies of a recent survey (completed within the last six months, maximum 1" to 400' scale), if required to do so at the pre -application meeting; and • The applicant is responsible for supplying the correct legal description. If questions arise concerning the legal description, an engineer's certification or sealed survey may be required. Section/Township/Range:3o 4e 26 Lot: Block: Subdivision: Metes & Bounds Description: Plat Book: Page #: Property I.D. Number: 00198000006 Size of Property: ft. x ft. = Total Sq. Ft. Acres: 935 Address/ General Location of Subject Property: South side Immokalee Rd. between 1-75 and Livingston Rd. PUD District (refer to LDC subsection 2.03.06 Q ❑ Commercial ■❑ Residential ❑ Community Facilities ❑ Mixed Use ❑ Other: ❑ Industrial February 1, 2019 Page 2 of 11 Cotl'ter County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239)252-2400 FAX: 1239) 252-6358 ADJACENT ZONING AND LAND USE Zoning Land Use N Carlton Lakes PUD Residential S Livingston Lakes PUD Residential E AG and Gasper Station PUD Agricultural and Commerical W Eboli PUD Bermuda Palms Residential Condo If the owner of the subject property owns contiguous property please provide a detailed legal description of the entire contiguous property on a separate sheet attached to the application. Section/Township/Range: Lot: Block: Subdivision: Plat Book: Page #f: Property I.D. Number: Metes & Bounds Description: ASSOCIATIONS Required: List all registered Home Owner Association(s) that could be affected by this petition. Provide additional sheets if necessary. Information can be found on the Board of County Commissioner's website at http://www.colliergov.net/Index.aspx?page=774. Name of Homeowner Association: Livingston Lakes Condominium Assocation Mailing Address: 4670 Cardinal way, 302. City: Naples Name of Homeowner Association: Bermuda Palms A Condominium Mailing Address: 4910 Cougar CT N City: Naples Name of Homeowner Association: Carlton Lakes PUD Association Mailing Address: 3150 Safe Harbor Dr. City: Naples Name of Homeowner Association: Pelican Strand Association Mailing Address: 9300 N. 16th St. City: Name of Homeowner Association: Mailing Address: City: State: FL ZIP: 34112 State: FL ZIP: 34109 State: FL ZIP: 33619 Tampa State: FL ZIP: 33619 State: ZIP: February 1, 2019 Page 3 of 11 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net Co1[ier County EVALUATION CRITERIA 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Pursuant to LDC subsections 10.02.13 B, 10.02.08 F and Chapter 3 G. of the Administrative Code, staffs analysis and recommendation to the Planning Commission, and the Planning Commission's recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners shall be based upon consideration of the applicable criteria. On a separate sheet attached to the application, provide a narrative statement describing the rezone request with specific reference to the criteria below. Include any backup materials and documentation in support of the request. a. The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer, water, and other utilities. b. Adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of any proposed agreements, contract, or other instruments, or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense. Findings and recommendations of this type shall be made only after consultation with the county attorney. C. Conformity of the proposed PUD with the goals, objectives and policies of the Growth Management Plan. (This is to include identifying what Sub -district, policy or other provision allows the requested uses/density, and fully explaining/addressing all criteria or conditions of that Sub -district, policy or other provision.) d. The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening requirements. e. The adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the development. f. The timing or sequence of development for the purpose of assuring the adequacy of available improvements and facilities, both public and private. g. The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion. h. Conformity with PUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the particular case, based on determination that such modifications of justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations. Deed Restrictions: The County is legally precluded from enforcing deed restrictions; however, many communities have adopted such restrictions. You may wish to contact the civic or property owners association in the area for which this use is being requested in order to ascertain whether or not the request is affected by existing deed restrictions. February 1, 2019 Page 4 of 11 Co*er County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Previous land use petitions on the subject property: To your knowledge, has a public hearing been held on this property within the last year? If so, what was the nature of that hearing? No Official Interpretations or Zoning Verifications: To your knowledge, has there been an official interpretation or zoning verification rendered on this property within the last year? ❑ Yes ■❑ No if so please provide copies. PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIREMENTS This land use petition requires a Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM), pursuant to Chapter 3 E. of the Administrative Code and LDC section 10.03.06. Following the NIM, the applicant will submit a written summary and any commitments that have been made at the meeting. Refer to Chapter 8 B. of the Administrative Code for the NIM procedural requirements. Chapter 8 of the Administrative Code requires that the applicant must remove their public hearing advertising sign(s) after final action is taken by the Board of County Commissioners. Based on the Board's final action on this item, please remove all public hearing advertising sign(s) immediately. RECORDING OF DEVELOPER COMMITMENTS Within 30 days of adoption of the Ordinance, the owner or developer (specify name) at their expense shall record in the Public Records of Collier County a Memorandum of Understanding of Developer Commitments or Notice of Developer Commitments that contains the legal description of the property that is the subject of the land use petition and contains each and every commitment of the owner or developer specified in the Ordinance. The Memorandum or Notice shall be in form acceptable to the County and shall comply with the recording requirements of Chapter 695, F5. A recorded copy of the Memorandum or Notice shall be provided to the Collier County Planned Unit Development Monitoring staff within 15 days of recording of said Memorandum or Notice. LDC subsection 10.02.08 D This application will be considered "open" when the determination of "sufficiency" has been made and the application is assigned a petition processing number. The application will be considered "closed" when the petitioner withdraws the application through written notice or ceases to supply amendment or change, for a period of 6 months. An application deemed "closed" will not receil further processing and an application "closed" through inactivity shall be deemed withdrawn. F application deemed "closed" may be re -opened by submission of a new application, repayment all application fees and the grant of a determination of "sufficiency". Further review of the reque will be subiect to the then current code. February 1, 2019 Page 5 of 11 CiOLL1er County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 STATEMENT OF UTILITY PROVISIONS FOR PUD REZONE REQUEST APPLICANT CONTACT INFORMATION Name of Applicant(s): CIG Naples, LLC Address: 226 East 8th St. City: Cincinnati State: OH ZIP: 45202 Telephone: (513)246-1985 Cell: (513)659-6181 E-Mail Address: gregg.fusaro@cigproperties.com Address of Subject Property (If available): N/A City: Naples State: FL ZIP: 34110 PROPERTY INFORMATION Section/Township/Range:30 /48 /26 Lot: Block: Subdivision: Fax: (513)241-9390 Metes & Bounds Description: 30,48,26 W 1/2 of E 1/2 of NW 1/4, Less N 100ft R/W Plat Book: 5460 Page #: 132 Property I.D. Number: 00198000006 TYPE OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL TO BE PROVIDED Check applicable system: a. County Utility System b. City Utility System ❑ C. Franchised Utility System ❑ Provide Name: Collier County Utilities d. Package Treatment Plant ❑ (GPD Capacity): e. Seotic Svstem F1 I TYPE OF WATER SERVICE TO BE PROVIDED I Check applicable system: a. County Utility System 12 b. City Utility System ❑ C. Franchised Utility System ❑ d. Private System (Well) ❑ Provide Name: Collier County Utilities Total Population to be Served: 700 (2.5 people per Dwelling Unit) Peak and Average Daily Demands: A. Water -Peak: 135,986GPD Average Daily: 100,730GPD B. Sewer -Peak: 107,925GPD Average Daily: 71,950GPD If proposing to be connected to Collier County Regional Water System, please provide the date service is expected to be required: June 2021 February 1, 2019 Page 6 of 11 Cotl'ier County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239)252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Narrative statement: Provide a brief and concise narrative statement and schematic drawing of sewage treatment process to be used as well as a specific statement regarding the method of affluent and sludge disposal. If percolation ponds are to be used, then percolation data and soil involved shall be provided from tests prepared and certified by a professional engineer. Please see attached. Collier County Utility Dedication Statement: If the project is located within the service boundaries of Collier County's utility service system, a notarized statement shall be provided agreeing to dedicate the water distribution and sewage collection facilities within the project area to the Collier County Utilities. This shall occur upon completion of the construction of these facilities in accordance with all applicable County ordinances in effect at that time. This statement shall also include an agreement that the applicable system development charges and connection fees will be paid to the County Utilities Division prior to the issuance of building permits by the County. If applicable, the statement shall contain an agreement to dedicate the appropriate utility easements for serving the water and sewer systems. Statement of Availability Capacity from other Providers: Unless waived or otherwise provided for at the pre -application meeting, if the project is to receive sewer or potable water services from any provider other than the County, a statement from that provider indicating adequate capacity to serve the project shall be provided. February 1, 2019 Page 7 of 11 COitieV County PL20190001600 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252.6358 COVENANT OF UNIFIED CONTROL The undersigned do hereby swear or affirm that we are the fee simple titleholders and owners of record of property commonly known as ajjo # 00198000006 Sec 30. Tovvnshp 48-Range 26 W 1/2 of E 1/2 of NW 114 of NW4/4, Less N 100 Ft. Collier County, Florida (street address and City, State and Zip Code) and legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto. The P-Uprroperty described herein is the subject of an application forgb,Arnrai nnartmentsplanned unit development (_ L PUD) zoning. We hereby designate_ Thomas D. Barber, legal representative thereof, as the legal representatives of the property and as such, these individuals are authorized to legally bind all owners of the property in the course of seeking the necessary approvals to develop. This authority Includes, but Is not limited to, the hiring and authorization of agents to assist In the preparation of applications, plans, surveys, and studies necessary to obtain zoning approval on the site. These representatives will remain the only entity to authorize development activity on the property until such time as a new or amended covenant of unified control is delivered to Collier County. The undersigned recognize the following and will be guided accordingly in the pursuit of development of the project: 1. The property will be developed and used in conformity with the approved master plan including all conditions placed on the development and all commitments agreed to by the applicant in connection with the planned unit development rezoning. 2. The legal representative identified herein is responsible for compliance with all terms, conditions, safeguards, and stipulations made at the time of approval of the master plan, even if the property is subsequently sold in whole or in part, unless and until a new or amended covenant of unified control is delivered to and recorded by Collier County. 3. A departure from the provisions of the approved plans or a failure to comply with any requirements, conditions, or safeguards provided for in the planned unit development process will constitute a violation of the Land Development Code. 4. All terms and conditions of the planned unit development approval will be incorporated into covenants and restrictions which run with the land so as to provide notice to subsequent owners that all development activity within the planned unit development must be consistent with those terms and conditions. S. So long as this covenant is in force, Collier County can, upon the discovery of noncompliance with the terms, safeguards, and conditions of the planned unit development, seek equitable relief as necessary to compel compliance. The County will not issue permits, certificates, or licenses to occupy or use any part of the planned unit development d the County may stop ongoing construction activity until the project is brought Into compliance with III terrri�, cpr ions and safeguards of the planned unit development. Oe'r U I�efad Owner Printed Name printed Name �,FA•FE F�-ft• RFl,9i,A) d)1 tcJct r l AS tot(b af}#irmed) Ad subscribed before me this �t day of by who is personally known to me or has produced -I be 5 C 1Ce IL LC as Identification. d.Xt rG -�hr\ UCN _t i Notary Public (Name typed, printed or ed AANNGf Notary Public Slsie of Michlr)nn County of wnyne )My Commission Expires Apr 11. ;01R Acting in the County of l[ �"¢" t.�b L February 1. 2019 Page 8 of 11 Collier County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net Final Submittal Requirement Checklist for: ❑ PUD Rezone- Ch. 3 G. 1 of the Administrative Code ❑ Amendment to PUD- Ch. 3 G. 2 of the Administrative Code ❑ PUD to PUD Rezone- Ch. 3 G. 1 of the Administrative Code 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 The following Submittal Requirement checklist is to be utilized during the Pre -Application Meeting and at time of application submittal. At final submittal, the checklist is to be completed and submitted with an up-to-date application. Please provide the submittal items in the exact order listed below, with cover sheets attached to each section. Incomplete submittals will not be accepted. A Model PUD Document is available online at http://www.colliercountvfl.gov/Home/ShowDocument?id=76983. REQUIREMENTS COPIES REQUIRED NOT REQUIRED Cover Letter with Narrative Statement including a detailed description of why amendment is necessary 1 ❑ ❑ Completed Application with required attachments (download latest version) 1 Pre -application meeting notes 1 0 ❑ Affidavit of Authorization signed and notarized 1 Property Ownership Disclosure Form 1 Notarized and completed Covenant of Unified Control 1 Completed Addressing Checklist 1 Warranty Deed(s) 1 0 ❑ List Identifying Owner and all parties of corporation 1 0 ❑ Signed and sealed Boundary Survey 1 ❑ ❑ Architectural Rendering of proposed structures 1 ❑ ❑ Current Aerial Photographs (available from Property Appraiser) with project boundary and, if vegetated, FLUCFCS Codes with legend included on aerial. 1 ❑ ❑ Statement of Utility Provisions 1 ❑ ❑ Environmental Data Requirements pursuant to LDC section 3.08.00 1 ❑ ❑ Environmental Data Requirements collated into a single Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) packet at time of public hearings. Coordinate with project planner at time of public hearings. ❑ 0 ❑ Listed or Protected Species survey, less than 12 months old. Include copies of previous surveys. 1 ❑ ❑ Traffic Impact Study 1 El ❑ Historical Survey 1 ❑ ❑ School Impact Analysis Application, if applicable 1 ❑ 1 ❑ Electronic copy of all required documents 1 El ❑ Completed Exhibits A-F (see below for additional information)* ❑ ❑ ❑ List of requested deviations from the LDC with justification for each (this document is separate from Exhibit E) ❑ ❑ ❑ Checklist continues on next page February 1, 2019 Page 9 of 11 Collier County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Revised Conceptual Master Site Plan 24" x 36"and One 8 %" x 11" copy Q 0 ❑ Original PUD document/ordinance, and Master Plan 24" x 36" —Only if the PUD E] E] E]Amending Revised PUD document with changes crossed thru & underlined 1 ❑ ❑ Copy of Official Interpretation and/or Zoning Verification 1 ❑ ❑ *If located in Immokalee or seeking affordable housing, include an additional set of each submittal requirement `The following exhibits are to be completed on a separate document and attached to the application packet: 9 Exhibit A: List of Permitted Uses X Exhibit 8: Development Standards X Exhibit C: Master Plan- See Chapter 3 E. 1. of the Administrative Code X Exhibit D: Legal Description R Exhibit E: List of Requested LDC Deviations and justification for each X Exhibit F: List of Development Commitments If located in RFMU (Rural Fringe Mixed Use) Receiving Land Areas Pursuant to LDC subsection 2.03.08.A.2.a.2.(b.)i.c., the applicant must contact the Florida Forest Service at 239- 690-3500 for information regarding "Wildfire Mitigation & Prevention Plan." PLANNERS — INDICATE IF THE PETITION NEEDS TO BE ROUTED TO THE FOLLOWING REVIEWERS: El School District (Residential Components): Amy Lockheart ❑ Conservancy of SWFL: Nichole Johnson ❑� Utilities Engineering: Eric Fey ❑ Parks and Recreation: Barry Williams (Director) ❑ Emergency Management: Dan Summers ❑ Immokalee Water/Sewer District: ❑ City of Naples: Robin Singer, Planning Director ❑ Other: ❑ City of Naples Utilities ❑ Other: ASSOCIATED FEES FOR APPLICATION ❑ Pre -Application Meeting: $500.00 5d PUD Rezone: $10,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre ❑ PUD to PUD Rezone: $8,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre ❑ PUD Amendment: $6,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre X Comprehensive Planning Consistency Review: $2,250.00 ❑ Environmental Data Requirements -EIS Packet (submittal determined at pre -application meeting): $2,500.00 xJ Listed or Protected Species Review (when an EIS is not required): $1,000.00 X Transportation Review Fees: o Methodology Review: $500.00 *Additional fees to be determined at Methodology Meeting. fv Minor Study Review: $750.00 o Major Study Review $1,500.00 February 1, 2019 Page 10 of 11 Co ler County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net X Legal Advertising Fees: o CCPC: $1,125.00 ox BCC: $500.00 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6958 F School Concurrency Fee, if applicable: o Mitigation Fees, if application, to be determined by the School District in coordination with the County Fire Code Plans Review Fees are not listed, but are collected at the time of application submission and those fees are set forth by the Authority having jurisdiction. The Land Development Code requires Neighborhood Notification mailers for Applications headed to hearing, and this fee is collected prior to hearing. All checks payable to: Board of County Commissioners. As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is included in this submittal package. I understand that failure to include all necessary submittal information may result in the delay of processing this petition. *Add iti a! a for the Sth a d subsequent re -submittal will be accessed at 20% of the original fee. Arim 3 d7 ?J Signature of itio orAge t Date Kre'" W. F'1-6^0 Printed named o signing party February 1, 2019 Page 11 of 11 Comer County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 Post Review Meeting Notes Petition Type: Date and Time: Assigned Planner: Engineering Manager (for PPL's and FP's): Nroject Information Project Name: PL #: Property ID #: Project Address: _ Applicant: Agent Name: Agent/Firm Address: Property Owner: _ Current Zoning: City: State Phone: City: 0-3 State: Zip: Please provide the following, if applicable: i. Total Acreage: ii. Proposed # of Residential Units: iii. Proposed Commercial Square Footage: iv. For Amendments, indicate the original petition number: V. If there is an Ordinance or Resolution associated with this project, please indicate the type and number: vi. If the project is within a Plat, provide the name and AR#/PL#: Updated 6/12/2019 Page 1 1 of 5 GOAT County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 Meeting Notes As of 10/16/2017 all Zoning applications have revised applications, and your associated Application is included in your notes; additionally, a *new Property Ownership Disclosure Form is required for all applications. A copy of this new form is included in your pre-app Note — link is https://www.colliergov.net/Home/ShowDocument?id=75093. Disclaimer: Information provided by staff to applicant during the Pre -Application Meeting is based on the best available data at the time of the meeting and may not fully inform the applicant of issues that could arise during the process. The Administrative Code and LDC dictates the regulations which all applications must satisfy. Any checklists provided of required data for an application may not fully outline what is needed. It is the applicant's responsibility to provide all required data. Updated 6/12/2019 Page 1 2 of 5 f Co ier County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 Meeting Notes Other required documentation for submittal (not listed on application): Disclaimer: Information provided by staff to applicant during the Pre -Application Meeting is based on the best available data at the time of the meeting and may not fully inform the applicant of issues that could arise during the process. The Administrative Code and LDC dictates the regulations which all applications must satisfy. Any checklists provided of required data for an application may not fully outline what is needed. It is the applicant's responsibility to provide all required data. Updated 6/12/2019 Page 1 3 of 5 Comer County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 Pre -Application Meeting Sign -In Sheet PL# Collier County Contact Information: Name Review Discipline Phone Email ❑ David Anthony Environmental Review 252-2497 david.anthony@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Claudine Auclair GMD Operations and Regulatory Management 252-5887 claudine.auclair@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Sally Ashkar Assistant County Attorney 252-8842 Sally.Ashkar@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Steve Baluch Transportation Planning 252-2361 stephen.baluch@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Ray Bellows Zoning, Planning Manager 252-2463 raymond.bellows@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Laurie Beard PUD Monitoring 252-5782 laurie.beard @colliercountyfLgov ❑ Craig Brown Environmental Specialist 252-2548 craig.brown@col liercountyfLgov ❑ Alexandra Casanova Operations Coordinator 252-2658 Alexandra.casanova@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Heidi Ashton Cicko Managing Asst. County Attorney 252-8773 heidi.ashton@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Thomas Clarke Operations Coordinator 252-2584 thomas.clarke@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Dale Fey North Collier Fire 597-9227 dfey@northcollierfire.com ❑ Eric Fey, P.E. Utility Planning 252-1037 eric.fey@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Tim Finn, AICP Zoning Division 252-4312 timothy.finn@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Sue Faulkner Comprehensive Planning 252-5715 sue.faulkner@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Paula Fleishman Impact Fee Administration 252-2924 paula.fleishman@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ James French Growth Management Deputy Department Head 252-5717 james.french@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Michael Gibbons Structural/Residential Plan Review 252-2426 michael.gibbons@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Storm Gewirtz, P.E. Engineering Stormwater 252-2434 storm.gewirtz@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Nancy Gundlach, AICP, PLA Zoning Division 252-2484 nancy.gundlach@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Shar Hingson Greater Naples Fire District 774-2800 shingson@gnfire.org ❑ John Houldsworth Engineering Subdivision 252-5757 john.houldsworth@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Jodi Hughes Transportation Pathways 252-5744 jodi.hughes@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Alicia Humphries Right -Of -Way Permitting 252-2326 aIicia.humph ries@colliercountyfLgov ❑ Marcia Kendall Comprehensive Planning 252-2387 marcia.kendall@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ John Kelly Zoning Senior Planner 252-5719 john.kelly@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Gil Martinez Principal Planner 252-4211 Gilbert.Martinez@Colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Thomas Mastroberto Greater Naples Fire 252-7348 thomas.mastroberto@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Jack McKenna, P.E. Engineering Services 252-2911 jack.mckenna@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Matt McLean, P.E. Development Review Director 252-8279 matthew.mclean@colliercountyfl.gov Updated 6/12/2019 Page 1 4 of 5 Comer County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 ❑ Michele Mosca, AICP Capital Project Planning 252-2466 michele.mosca@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Annis Moxam Addressing 252-5519 annis.moxam@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Stefanie Nawrocki Development Review - Zoning 252-2313 stefanie.nawrocki@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Richard Orth Stormwater Planning 252-5092 richard.orth@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Brandy Otero Transit 252-5859 bra ndy.otero@colliercountyfLgov ❑ Brandi Pollard Utility Impact fees 252-6237 brand i.pollard @colliercountyfLgov ❑ Todd Riggall North Collier Fire 597-9227 triggall@northcollierfire.com ❑ Daniel Roman, P.E. Engineering Utilities 252-2538 daniel.roman@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Brett Rosenblum, P.E. Development Review Principal Project Manager 252-2905 brett.rosenblum@coiliercountyfLgov ❑ James Sabo, AICP Zoning Principal Planner 252-2708 james.sabo@colliergo.net ❑ Michael Sawyer Transportation Planning 252-2926 michael.sawyer@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Corby Schmidt, AICP Comprehensive Planning 252-2944 corby.schmidt@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Chris Scott, AICP Development Review - Zoning 252-2460 chris.scott@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Linda Simmons North Collier Fire 252-2311 lnda.simmons@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Peter Shawinsky Architectural Review 252-8523 peter.shawinsky@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Camden Smith Zoning Division Operations 252-1042 camden.smith@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Mark Strain Hearing Examiner/CCPC 252-4446 mark.strain@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Mark Templeton Landscape Review 252-2475 mark.templeton@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Jessica Velasco Zoning Division Operations 252-2584 jessica.velasco@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Jon Walsh, P.E. Building Review 252-2962 jonathan.walsh@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ David Weeks, AICP Comprehensive Planning Future Land Use Consistency 252-2306 david.weeks@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Kirsten Wilkie Environmental Review 252-5518 kirsten.wilkie@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Christine Willoughby Development Review - Zoning 252-5748 christine.willoughby@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Daniel Zunzunegui North Collier Fire 252-2310 daniel.zunzunegui@colliercountyfl.gov Additional Attendee Contact Information: Name Representing Phone Email Updated 6/12/2019 Page 1 5 of 5 AFFIDAVIT OF AUTHORIZATION FOR PETITION NUMBERS(S) PL20190001600, PL20190001620 1, KURT G. SCHERER (OR) WM . S CHERER(print name), as TRUSTEE (title, if applicable) of WILLIAM C. SCHERER TRUST (company, If applicable), swear or affirm under oath, that I am the (choose one) ownerF— applicant=contract purchaser=and that: 1. 1 have full authority to secure the approval(s) requested and to impose covenants and restrictions on the referenced property as a result of any action approved by the County in accordance with this application and the Land Development Code; 2. All answers to the questions in this application and any sketches, data or other supplementary matter attached hereto and made a part of this application are honest and true; 3. 1 have authorized the staff of Collier County to enter upon the property during normal working hours for the purpose of investigating and evaluating the request made through this application; and that 4. The property will be transferred, conveyed, sold or subdivided subject to the conditions and restrictions imposed by the approved action. 5. Well authorize CIG NAPLES, LLC to act as our/my representative in any matters regarding this petition including 1 through 2 above. `Notes: • If the applicant is a corporation, then it is usually executed by the core. pres. or v. pres. • If the applicant is a Limited Liability Company (L.L.C.) or Limited Company (L.C.), then the documents should typically be signed by the Company's "Managing Member." • If the applicant is a partnership, then typically a partner can sign on behalf of the partnership. • If the applicant is a limited partnership, then the general partner must sign and be identified as the "general partner" of the named partnership. • If the applicant is a trust, then they must include the trustee's name and the words "as trustee" • In each instance, first determine the applicant's status, e.g., individual, corporate, trust, partnership, and then use the appropriate format for that ownership. Un r penalties the fa twftted' STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER , I declare that I have read the foregoing Affidavit of Authorization and that true. Date The foregoing instrument was acknowleged before me by means of physical presence or ®o line not rization this day of ;LV , 20Z, by (printed name of owner or qualifier),f'17 Such person(s) Notary Public must check applicable box: Are personally known to me ® Has produced a current drivers license E3 Has produced identification. Notary Signature: d , ;;�r'"�e,: dAV115111Ct comnb m 0 FF 9691T3 ExftaJuW5$7r• o� o?�. BpdedThu7tq, I O8D0.1Bbm CP\08-COA-00115\155 REV 3/4/2020 AFFIDAVIT OF AUTHORIZATION FOR PETITION NUMBERS(S) PUD PL20190001600& GMPA PL20190001620 1, David Bastos (print name), as Manager (title, if applicable) of GIG Naples, LLD. (company, if ap licable), swear or affirm under oath, that I am the (choose one) owner= applicant =contract purchaser✓ and that: 1. I have full authority to secure the approval(s) requested and to impose covenants and restrictions on the referenced property as a result of any action approved by the County in accordance with this application and the Land Development Code; 2. All answers to the questions in this application and any sketches, data or other supplementary matter attached hereto and made a part of this application are honest and true; 3. 1 have authorized the staff of Collier County to enter upon the property during normal working hours for the purpose of investigating and evaluating the request made through this application; and that 4. The property will be transferred, conveyed, sold or subdivided subject to the conditions and restrictions imposed by the approved action. 5. Well authorize Jeff E.wdght- Henderson BFranlin to act as ourlmy representative in any matters regarding this petition including 1 through 2 above. *Notes: • If the applicant is a corporation, then it is usually executed by the corp. pres. or v. pres. • If the applicant is a Limited Liability Company (L.L.C.) or Limited Company (L.C.), then the documents should typically be signed by the Company's "Managing Member." • If the applicant is a partnership, then typically a partner can sign on behalf of the partnership. • If the applicant is a limited partnership, then the general partner must sign and be identified as the general partner" of the named partnership. • If the applicant is a trust, then they must include the trustee's name and the words "as trustee"- • In each instance, first determine the applicant's status, e.g., individual, corporate, trust, partnership, and then use the appropriate format for that ownership. Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I have read the foregoing Affidavit of Authorization and that the facts stated in it are true. 1'-- y/13 /a�a Signature T ate STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER The foregoin instrument was acknowleged before me by means of ®physical presencegRr online notarization this t`� day of * \� , 2074 , by (printed name of owner or qualifier/ yl d "S a 3 Such person(s) Notary Public must check applicable box: ® Are personally known to me ❑ Has produced a current drivers license ❑ Has produced ///�� Notary Signature: as identification. .G-- TERESA ANN WALDEN Notary Pudic, State of Ohio My Commission Expires ID-15.2022 CP\08-COA-00115\155 REV 3/4/2020 AFFIDAVIT OF AUTHORIZATION FOR PETITION NUMBERS(S) PUDPL20190001600&GMPAPL20190001620 1, David Bastos (print name), as Manager (title, if applicable) of cIG Naples, LLc. (company, If a plicable), swear or affirm under oath, that I am the (choose one) owner= applicant=contract purchaser✓ and that: 1. I have full authority to secure the approval(s) requested and to impose covenants and restrictions on the referenced property as a result of any action approved by the County in accordance with this application and the Land Development Code; 2. All answers to the questions in this application and any sketches, data or other supplementary matter attached hereto and made a part of this application are honest and true; 3. 1 have authorized the staff of Collier County to enter upon the property during normal working hours for the purpose of investigating and evaluating the request made through this application; and that 4. The property will be transferred, conveyed, sold or subdivided subject to the conditions and restrictions imposed by the approved action. 5. We/I authorize Patackyanasse,AIGP to act as our/my representative in any matters regarding this petition including 1 through 2 above. *Notes: • If the applicant is a corporation, then it is usually executed by the corp. pres. or v. pres. • If the applicant is a Limited Liability Company (L.L.C.) or Limited Company (L.C.), then the documents should typically be signed by the Company's "Managing Member." • If the applicant is a partnership, then typically a partner can sign on behalf of the partnership. • If the applicant is a limited partnership, then the general partner must sign and be identified as the general partner" of the named partnership. • If the applicant is a trust, then they must include the trustee's name and the words "as trustee". • In each instance, first determine the applicant's status, e.g., individual, corporate, trust, partnership, and then use the appropriate format for that ownership. Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I have read the foregoing Affidavit of Authorization and that the facts stated In It are true. Signature 7I Date STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER ryryTThe foregoing instrument was acknowleged before me by means of I@ physical presen or ®online notarization this , day of ��r (1 201-j , by (printed name of owner or qualifier) \� Ni Atzsb s Such person(s) Notary Public must check applicable box: ® Are personally known to me ® Has produced a current drivers license ® Has produced as identification. Notary Signature< , a%. %�# WCLJ -- TERESA ANN WALDEN Notary Public, State of Ohio My Commission Expires 10-15.2022 cP\08-coA-00115a55 REV 3/4@020 AFFIDAVIT OF AUTHORIZATION FOR PETITION NUMBERS(S) PUD PL20190001600& GMPA PL20190001620 1, David Bastos (print name), as Manager (title, if applicable) of GIG Naples, LLD. (company, if ap licable), swear or affirm under oath, that I am the (choose one) owner= applicant =contract purchaser✓ and that: 1. I have full authority to secure the approval(s) requested and to impose covenants and restrictions on the referenced property as a result of any action approved by the County in accordance with this application and the Land Development Code; 2. All answers to the questions in this application and any sketches, data or other supplementary matter attached hereto and made a part of this application are honest and true; 3. 1 have authorized the staff of Collier County to enter upon the property during normal working hours for the purpose of investigating and evaluating the request made through this application; and that 4. The property will be transferred, conveyed, sold or subdivided subject to the conditions and restrictions imposed by the approved action. 5. Well authorize Jeff E.wdght- Henderson BFranlin to act as ourlmy representative in any matters regarding this petition including 1 through 2 above. *Notes: • If the applicant is a corporation, then it is usually executed by the corp. pres. or v. pres. • If the applicant is a Limited Liability Company (L.L.C.) or Limited Company (L.C.), then the documents should typically be signed by the Company's "Managing Member." • If the applicant is a partnership, then typically a partner can sign on behalf of the partnership. • If the applicant is a limited partnership, then the general partner must sign and be identified as the general partner" of the named partnership. • If the applicant is a trust, then they must include the trustee's name and the words "as trustee"- • In each instance, first determine the applicant's status, e.g., individual, corporate, trust, partnership, and then use the appropriate format for that ownership. Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I have read the foregoing Affidavit of Authorization and that the facts stated in it are true. 1'-- y/13 /a�a Signature T ate STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER The foregoin instrument was acknowleged before me by means of ®physical presencegRr online notarization this t`� day of * \� , 2074 , by (printed name of owner or qualifier/ yl d "S a 3 Such person(s) Notary Public must check applicable box: ® Are personally known to me ❑ Has produced a current drivers license ❑ Has produced ///�� Notary Signature: as identification. .G-- TERESA ANN WALDEN Notary Pudic, State of Ohio My Commission Expires ID-15.2022 CP\08-COA-00115\155 REV 3/4/2020 AFFIDAVIT OF AUTHORIZATION FOR PETITION NUMBERS(S) PUDPL20190001600&GMPAPL20190001620 1, David Bastos (print name), as Manager (title, if applicable) of cIG Naples, LLc. (company, If a plicable), swear or affirm under oath, that I am the (choose one) owner= applicant=contract purchaser✓ and that: 1. I have full authority to secure the approval(s) requested and to impose covenants and restrictions on the referenced property as a result of any action approved by the County in accordance with this application and the Land Development Code; 2. All answers to the questions in this application and any sketches, data or other supplementary matter attached hereto and made a part of this application are honest and true; 3. 1 have authorized the staff of Collier County to enter upon the property during normal working hours for the purpose of investigating and evaluating the request made through this application; and that 4. The property will be transferred, conveyed, sold or subdivided subject to the conditions and restrictions imposed by the approved action. 5. We/I authorize Patackyanasse,AIGP to act as our/my representative in any matters regarding this petition including 1 through 2 above. *Notes: • If the applicant is a corporation, then it is usually executed by the corp. pres. or v. pres. • If the applicant is a Limited Liability Company (L.L.C.) or Limited Company (L.C.), then the documents should typically be signed by the Company's "Managing Member." • If the applicant is a partnership, then typically a partner can sign on behalf of the partnership. • If the applicant is a limited partnership, then the general partner must sign and be identified as the general partner" of the named partnership. • If the applicant is a trust, then they must include the trustee's name and the words "as trustee". • In each instance, first determine the applicant's status, e.g., individual, corporate, trust, partnership, and then use the appropriate format for that ownership. Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I have read the foregoing Affidavit of Authorization and that the facts stated In It are true. Signature 7I Date STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER ryryTThe foregoing instrument was acknowleged before me by means of I@ physical presen or ®online notarization this , day of ��r (1 201-j , by (printed name of owner or qualifier) \� Ni Atzsb s Such person(s) Notary Public must check applicable box: ® Are personally known to me ® Has produced a current drivers license ® Has produced as identification. Notary Signature< , a%. %�# WCLJ -- TERESA ANN WALDEN Notary Public, State of Ohio My Commission Expires 10-15.2022 cP\08-coA-00115a55 REV 3/4@020 COitieV County PL20190001600 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252.6358 COVENANT OF UNIFIED CONTROL The undersigned do hereby swear or affirm that we are the fee simple titleholders and owners of record of property commonly known as ajjo # 00198000006 Sec 30. Tovvnshp 48-Range 26 W 1/2 of E 1/2 of NW 114 of NW4/4, Less N 100 Ft. Collier County, Florida (street address and City, State and Zip Code) and legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto. The P-Uprroperty described herein is the subject of an application forgb,Arnrai nnartmentsplanned unit development (_ L PUD) zoning. We hereby designate_ Thomas D. Barber, legal representative thereof, as the legal representatives of the property and as such, these individuals are authorized to legally bind all owners of the property in the course of seeking the necessary approvals to develop. This authority Includes, but Is not limited to, the hiring and authorization of agents to assist In the preparation of applications, plans, surveys, and studies necessary to obtain zoning approval on the site. These representatives will remain the only entity to authorize development activity on the property until such time as a new or amended covenant of unified control is delivered to Collier County. The undersigned recognize the following and will be guided accordingly in the pursuit of development of the project: 1. The property will be developed and used in conformity with the approved master plan including all conditions placed on the development and all commitments agreed to by the applicant in connection with the planned unit development rezoning. 2. The legal representative identified herein is responsible for compliance with all terms, conditions, safeguards, and stipulations made at the time of approval of the master plan, even if the property is subsequently sold in whole or in part, unless and until a new or amended covenant of unified control is delivered to and recorded by Collier County. 3. A departure from the provisions of the approved plans or a failure to comply with any requirements, conditions, or safeguards provided for in the planned unit development process will constitute a violation of the Land Development Code. 4. All terms and conditions of the planned unit development approval will be incorporated into covenants and restrictions which run with the land so as to provide notice to subsequent owners that all development activity within the planned unit development must be consistent with those terms and conditions. S. So long as this covenant is in force, Collier County can, upon the discovery of noncompliance with the terms, safeguards, and conditions of the planned unit development, seek equitable relief as necessary to compel compliance. The County will not issue permits, certificates, or licenses to occupy or use any part of the planned unit development d the County may stop ongoing construction activity until the project is brought Into compliance with III terrri�, cpr ions and safeguards of the planned unit development. Oe'r U I�efad Owner Printed Name printed Name �,FA•FE F�-ft• RFl,9i,A) d)1 tcJct r l AS tot(b af}#irmed) Ad subscribed before me this �t day of by who is personally known to me or has produced -I be 5 C 1Ce IL LC as Identification. d.Xt rG -�hr\ UCN _t i Notary Public (Name typed, printed or ed AANNGf Notary Public Slsie of Michlr)nn County of wnyne )My Commission Expires Apr 11. ;01R Acting in the County of l[ �"¢" t.�b L February 1. 2019 Page 8 of 11 Co filer county COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliereov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-5358 PROPERTY OWNERSHIP DISCLOSURE FORM This is a required form with all land use petitions, except for Appeals and Zoning Verification Letters. Should any changes of ownership or changes in contracts for purchase occur subsequent to the date of application, but prior to the date of the final public hearing, it is the responsibility of the applicant, or agent on his behalf, to submit a supplemental disclosure of interest form. Please complete the following, use additional sheets if necessary. a. If the property is owned fee simple by an INDIVIDUAL, tenancy by the entirety, tenancy in common, or joint tenancy, list all parties with an ownership interest as well as the percentage of such interest: 31 C. r = Name and Address % of Ownership GVrc L e'. 7f'rI T G � _ t fi ►� � L `�ie w � � � D �A:9 If the property is owned by a CORPORATION, list the officers and stockholders and the percentage of stock owned by each: Name and Address % of Ownership cl�Arowl 71 LAI mi- 03 If the property is in the name of a TRUSTEE, list the beneficiaries of the trust with the percentage of interest: Name and Address % of Ownership William %. Scherer c/o Excel Real Estate 2375 N. Tamiami Trail #206 Naples, FL 34103 }'ill►. Li elpj T� i RV465 Created 9/28/2017 r-/]C,: i- ]'CNN 5hw-'E< Page I of 3 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net Si er County 28M NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34204 1239) 252-2400 FAX: (233) 252-5358 d. If the property is in the name of a GENERAL or LIMITED PARTNERSHIP list the name of the general and/or limited partners: Name and Address % of Ownership NIA e. If there is a _CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE. with an individual or individuals, a Corporation, Trustee, or a Partnership, list the names of the contract purchasers below, including the officers, stockholders. beneficiaries. or partners: f [,A Name and Address % of Ownership {- 31. G 7 Date of Contract: If any contingency clause or contract terms involve additional parties, list all individuals or lu , UI LIUSL.- Name and Address NIA Date subject property acquired elf ❑ Leased: Term of lease years /months If, Petitioner has option to buy, indicate the following: Created 9/28/2017 Page 2 of 3 Ca er Co1.nty COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliereov.net (2391252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Date of option: Date option terminates: 0V or Anticipated closing date: AFFIRM PROPERTY OWNERSHIP INFORMATION Any petition required to have Property Ownership Disclosure, will not be accepted without this form. Requirements for petition types are located on the associated application form. Any change In ownership whether individually or with a Trustee, Company or other Interest -holding party, must be disclosed to Collier County Immediately if such change occurs prior to the petition's final public hearing. As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is included in this submittal package. I understand thatfailureto include all necessary submittal information may result in the delay of processing this petition. The completed application, all required submittal materials, and fees shall be submitted to: Growth Management Department ATTN; Business Center 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Agent/Owner Gregg Fusaro, Capital Investment Group, Inc. Agent/Owner Name (please print) Die Created 9/28/2017 page 3 of 3 Colfler county COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION www.colliergov.net ADDRESSING CHECKLIST 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 252-5724 Please complete the following and email to GMD_Addressing@colliergov.net or fax to the Operations Department at 239-252-5724 or submit in person to the Addressing Department at the above address. Form must be signed by Addressing personnel prior to pre -application meeting, please allow 3 days for processing. Not all items will apply to every project. Items in bold type are required. FOLIO NUMBERS MUST BE PROVIDED. Forms older than 6 months will require additional review and approval by the Addressing Department. PETITION TYPE (Indicate type below, complete a separate Addressing Checklist for each Petition type) ❑ BL (Blasting Permit) ❑ SDP (Site Development Plan) ❑ BD (Boat Dock Extension) ❑ SDPA (SDP Amendment) ❑ Carnival/Circus Permit ❑ SDPI (Insubstantial Change to SDP) ❑ CU (Conditional Use) ❑ SIP (Site Improvement Plan) ❑ EXP (Excavation Permit) ❑ SIPI (Insubstantial Change to SIP) ❑ FP (Final Plat ❑ SNR (Street Name Change) ❑ LLA (Lot Line Adjustment) ❑ SNC (Street Name Change — Unplatted) ❑ PNC (Project Name Change) ❑ TDR (Transfer of Development Rights) ❑ PPL (Plans & Plat Review) ❑ VA (Variance) ❑ PSP (Preliminary Subdivision Plat) ❑ VRP (Vegetation Removal Permit) ❑m PUD Rezone ❑ VRSFP (Vegetation Removal & Site Fill Permit) ❑ RZ (Standard Rezone) ❑ OTHER LEGAL DESCRIPTION of subject property or properties (copy of lengthy description may be attached) 30 48 26 W 1/2 OF E 1/2 NW 1/4 OF NW 1/4, LESS N 100 FT R/W FOLIO (Property ID) NUMBER(s) of above (attach to, or associate with, legal description if more than one) 00198000006 STREET ADDRESS or ADDRESSES (as applicable, if already assigned) N/A • LOCATION MAP must be attached showing exact location of project/site in relation to nearest public road right- of-way • SURVEY (copy - needed only for unplatted properties) PROPOSED PROJECT NAME (if applicable) CIG MIXED USE ( Coral Blue Apartments) (Not approved at this time.) PROPOSED STREET NAMES (if applicable) SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN NUMBER (for existing projects/sites only) SDP - or AR or PL # PL-20190001620 Coflie-r County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 252-5724 Project or development names proposed for, or already appearing in, condominium documents (if application; indicate whether proposed or existing) Please Return Approved Checklist By: ❑• Email Applicant Name: Tom Barber Phone: (239)597-3111 ❑ Fax ❑ Personally picked up Email/Fax: tom.barber@abbinc.com Signature on Addressing Checklist does not constitute Project and/or Street Name approval and is subject to further review by the Operations Department. FOR STAFF USE ONLY Folio Number 00198000006 Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Approved by: r'� -�� Date: 02/19/2020 Updated by: Date: IF OLDER THAN 6 MONTHS, FORM MUST BE UPDATED OR NEW FORM SUBMITTED FJ IMratluchan �' qpM I "� ri Search for Parcels by - �! YMialillili l 0 Search Results 8seaW&N,,, ��ne nmus '- Mp , iell FJi-ayer= ni-eaena o Prim l a' 1V. b l.. E'LAerial Year'. 2019 alesYear. OFF - 0.481< LEGEND TCONIENUME �MENT 011TA lEFina TEA "D"I N 1/4 CORNER OF : - Na�anY oawu NW CORNER OF SECTION 30, T. 48 S. R. 26 E. ♦ - _ N T N 11� SECTON 30, T. 48 5, R. 26 E. S 89"58'36" E (BEARING BASIS) 2640.19' (CALC) PER DNR REPORT DOC./081805 " NDT To swc PER DNR REPORT DOC./081805 NORTH LINE OF SECTION 30, T.48 S., R. 26 E. RN,wr" r� - IIIEIIY UK ET o NIRID a sT.T EIaI RreA10 S 89'58'36" E 660.05' IMMOKALEE ROAD C.R.846 ®- CAGE TV ONPNONN INNER N1 �ucTER I g SUBJECT A_ nN InDRANT I 8 IMMOKALEE ROAD 100' R/W &025 o 660 PROPER H Db- NATER WILtE S� a txNT Pau! I I z N $ T S 89'58'36" E 330.01' MEDIAN SOUTH R LINE PER DEED I x m . aLVAlION EO NOT FgVETUAI NRa/f�ataalK eo• rA7acNR xax-oxaNns EAmQa Fat _ MC p PaIEN�L NM -a 1E iOR G ND NMImINl2 FIGLIFH RaXAm N MO a o rAmlr TN Ro.o auNwc uTUTr o `niwaE Nnnr,uo Ah - AEt caaaoND I wNm xcr Reoaom x ae eaae ,n r ae , Nor¢ awe>m OF x ox $t 0ANw�'r I ca°0°xiEN1°°''mulPlr n°OwR1°Io'� �+n4�,�nNucntcaaaE,LxNE'D____ m emo PP — — =SEE NOTE #2 — qm NPEn I (oRo) _ cNautm I c Am l9/3984 eADN of eEANIos • m Fam PERPETUAL xox-ExaueETc EAmIENT FN ROAo RAE DRAxAaE AID a: ; oTNo I ¢ r M"111 o— ON _ CaxU[it NDNu" om:CO m I Im I VICINITY MAP N.T.S. C1V _ CAGE ,acxsax j GUS . mINTr tNu,. I'JUE]IFNT I If1 DETAIL 12] 122 1 OONC x ORANNMi[�Nea[NT z CURB I DI _ Dal NDE pl - DRAINAGE y 8. 3 ZONE DR _ DIUEE MY zEa F4w.taxr Q I ASPHALT PARKINGI Z E(F) - EAmEM .Z I O FEE FIEID NEAwnm Q - FINISHEDRIOR ELEVANw CONC. I .s N N GUY NOWSIDEWALK N 12.1 O I ui (ty: iE O % 1za NII'M �- DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY AS FURNISHED TO THE SURVEY 00 MEAN N wrm I N, - NaNI ANEPoCwI I IPP LvnICAL DATw OF TNN NONYA-LERTI1101— GEODETIC SEC. 30, L TOWNSHIP "T Tar I W 1/2 OFE 1/2OFNfTl W 1/4 OF NW 1/4, LESS N 100 FEET. e wr• I&M ON MOIL TN I COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA.ON _ I P : P,,TTr CFDmRVA1aE iza 122 00 PIP . Pa1NAmn CONTROL PONT PL9 - PRaFina1R LNID m1LE1CR 00 I (VACANT) I POO - POINT OF ECONOMIC MIC I :1`1 DO ®M: POINT PONN F 00 tl4 Pw . PEIN"CR RFIaIFEIfL I NO NNFNT PE. PONT OF TANONIr I4a - PAVEMENT P.IIL . PI1aG utuTr [Amer R REC . AECDN _ RADUE DtK RANDIE R= I - Rw W YMY y IQO IL3 I SEC. SEeax I SW.F. - SDEYNLK EAmEENr T 5- DON mNN _ TOITTINION' IP Is, . TENPmARY mNwYA1N I Z ry - TEusT®w TE . 1Ff111INO0Y U1NY EATOQlT Q. - wiRAraNnN�R I 9 E" I I I "A BERMUDA PALMS, A \10 I CONDOMINIUM O.R.BOOK 3575, ZONE I PAGE 1325 (OCCUPIED) HUBERT SCHERER TRUST O.R. BOOK 4466, PAGE 1075 ZONE "AE" (VACANT) I �I tL7 11.4 I I ZONE "AH" I 7 a.s �n I O z /e- w SURVEYORS' NOTES: STAMPED 1) No Tirle Commitment or Abstract of Title was furnished to the Surveyor. ZONE "AH" ZONE "AE" —10 5 va I 10 0 10 2) There are 4 concrete power poles and guy wires along the North line of the I subject property. No recorded easement has been furnished to the surveyor, Surveyor was unable to locate a recorded document for these poles. 3) Street Address is 5000 Immokolee Road, Naples, FL ZONE "AH" SCALE: 1" = TOO' I I 4) Bearings are based on thr North line of the NW 1/4 of Section 30, T.48 S.. R. 27 E. BEING S 89'58'36" E (ASSUMED) w� I 5) Property is in Flood Zone "X", "AE" & "AH" per F.I.R.M. Panel 120067. v I + 12021"C" 0194"H", dated 05/16/2012 a the Flood Zone lines shown on survey were copied from the FEMA DFirm map x and ore approximate. ozi I I 6) ALL ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON THIS PLAT ARE BASED ON NAVD88 DATUM. I ZONE "X"-500 FENCEEA'Cer I PREPARED FOR: CHAIN LINK FENCE CAPITAL INVESTMENT DEVELOPMENT TO CAPITAL INVESTMENT DEVELOPMENT GROUP, INC.; I o I GROUP, INC. THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THIS MAP OR PLAT AND THE SURVEY ON WHICH IT IS BASED WERE MADE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE 2016 MINIMIUM STANDARD DETAIL REQUIREMENTSFOR ALTA/NSPS LAND TITLE SURVEYS, JOINTLY ESTABLISHED AND ADOPTED — — — FND 5/e' CHAIN LINK N FDtCE Is FND 5/e" BY ALTA AND NSPS, AND INCLUDE ITEMS 1, 2, 3, 11 & 13 OF TABLE "A" THEREOF. THE ROD & CAP o'g SOUTH ROD &CAP FIELD WORK WAS COMPLETED ON AUGUST 2, 2019. ILLEGIBLE N 89"58'13" IN 329.86' ILLEGIBLE DATE OF PLAT: AUGUST 13, 2019 FENCE POST FENCE NEST WILLIAM A, NOVAN N & o.e' souTN LIVINGSTON LAKES, A O.R.BPATRICIA DO603, GE 184OS CONDOMINIUM O.R. BOOK 3286, O.R. BOOK 5T) PAGE 1848 PAGE 3286 REVISIONS ALTA SPS LAND TIME SURVEY (VACANT) FB 1245 48 P&A3066.DWG L—SEC DENNIS M. PORTELLA SR. PLS #4504� (OCCUPIED) OROSRBD BY. GREG FUSARO NOT VALID UNLESS SIGNED AND SEALED WITH A EMBOSSED RAISED SEAL OF THE PORTEIJ.A & ASSOCIATES, IJ.0 LBO 7904 FLORIDA LICENSED SURVEYOR AND MAPPER. f—. LINWOOD AVE. NAPLES, FL 34112 SCALE: 1 100' (239) 775-6511 INSTR 5486031 OR 5460 PG 132 RECORDED 12/20/2017 11:20 AM PAGES 2 DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT, COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA REC $18.50 Prepared by: Daniel J. Cramer Cramer, Minock & Sweeney, P.L.C. 339 E Liberty, Ste 200 Ann Arbor, Michigan 48104 QUIT CLAIM DEED Property Appraiser's Parcel Identification No. 00198000006 This Quit Claim Deed executed this 171h day of June, 2015, by first party, Grantor William C. Scherer, a single man and as the surviving spouse of Irene K. Scherel-l-whose address is 19218 Eastwood Drive, Harper Woods, Michigan 482125 -,.tQ second parry, Grantee William C. Scherer, as Trustee, William C. Scherer Trust u/a/d °"" 19 ended and restated on June 17, 2015, whose address is WITNESSETH: that tkie skid first fort sum 1 lest than $10, pty the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, does hereby rerrrie, ,lease ad quit lai unto the said second party forever, all the right, title, m resi � �yvh � �e d" if t'part has in and to the following described parcel of land, ands imp o ement , and in n iI'thereto in Collier County, Florida, to -wit: j W/1/2 of E 1/2 of NWi14`f,NW1/4, Less N 1 t Collier County, Florida ° I S To have and to hold the sam tag h w t_*a d singular the appurtenances thereunto belonging or in anywise appertaining, and afilIiate; right, title, interest, lien, equity and claim whatsoever for the said first party, either in law or equity, to the only proper use, benefit and behoof of the said second party forever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the first party has signed and sealed these presents the day and year first above written, sealed and delivered in the presence of: WITNESSES: ��. C/P b a r Janie 'J..Cramer r Janette Seile Carras William- C. Scherer *** OR 5460 PG 133 *** STATE OF MICHIGAN ) )SS COUNTY OF WASHTENAW ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me and produced photo identification, on this 17" day of June, 2015 by William C. Scherer, a single man and as the surviving spouse of Irene K. Scherer. K, p•.��ya4 � °�¢.7keaJ ' :�,a R•Jane e eile Carra ,Notary Public, Was t naw County, State of Michigan My Commission Expires: June 16, 2017 return to: aniThel J. Cramer Cramer, Minock & Sweeney, P; 339 East Liberty Street, Suite Ann Arbor, Michigan 48104 = t * Whose death certificate has �i2✓ County Records. . IS ndSOse, corded at Liber S,w Tax Bills to: 109e , Coif ier County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 'ROPFRTY 01niniERCNia DISCLOc-1 iRF FnRnn This is a required form with all land use petitions, except for Appeals and Zoning Verification Letters. Should any changes of ownership or changes in contracts for purchase occur subsequent to the date of application, but prior to the date of the final public hearing, it is the responsibility of the applicant, or agent on his behalf, to submit a supplemental disclosure of interest form. Please complete the following, use additional sheets if necessary. a. If the property is owned fee simple by an INDIVIDUAL, tenancy by the entirety, tenancy in common, or joint tenancy, list all parties with an ownership interest as well as the percentage of such interest: C Name and Address % of Ownership Re: William C. Scherer Trust 25 Janice M. Marshall, Trustee 16089 Bak Road Belleville, MI 48111 If the property is owned by a CORPORATION, list the officers and stockholders and the percentage of stock owned by each: Name and Address % of Ownership Kurt G. Scherer, Trustee 25 18590 Nunneley Clinton Township, MI 48035 If the property is in the name of a TRUSTEE, list the beneficiaries of the trust with the percentage of interest: Name and Address % of Ownership William G. Scherer c/o Excel Real Estate 25 2375 N. Tamiami Trail #206 Naples, FL 34103 (FBO: William G. Scherer, Trustee) W.C. Scherer Trust/Special Needs Trust 25 FBO: Lynn Scherer c/o:Janice M. Marshall 16089 Bak Road Belleville, MI 48111 Created 9/28/2017 Page 1 of 3 Coif ier County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 d. If the property is in the name of a GENERAL or LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, list the name of the general and/or limited partners: Name and Address % of Ownership N/A e. If there is a CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE, with an individual or individuals, a Corporation, Trustee, or a Partnership, list the names of the contract purchasers below, including the officers, stockholders, beneficiaries, or partners: Name and Address % of Ownership Capital Investment Development Group, LLC 100 Gregg A. Fusaro 5 David Bastos 31.67 Alexander Bastos 31.67 Kathleen Bergen 31.66 Date of Contract: 6/18/19 f. If any contingency clause or contract terms involve additional parties, list all individuals or officers, if a corporation, partnership, or trust: [- Name and Address N/A Date subject property acquired NSA ❑ Leased: Term of lease years /months If, Petitioner has option to buy, indicate the following: Created 9/28/2017 Page 2 of 3 Ca er Co1.nty COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliereov.net (2391252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Date of option: Date option terminates: 0V or Anticipated closing date: AFFIRM PROPERTY OWNERSHIP INFORMATION Any petition required to have Property Ownership Disclosure, will not be accepted without this form. Requirements for petition types are located on the associated application form. Any change In ownership whether individually or with a Trustee, Company or other Interest -holding party, must be disclosed to Collier County Immediately if such change occurs prior to the petition's final public hearing. As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is included in this submittal package. I understand thatfailureto include all necessary submittal information may result in the delay of processing this petition. The completed application, all required submittal materials, and fees shall be submitted to: Growth Management Department ATTN; Business Center 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Agent/Owner Gregg Fusaro, Capital Investment Group, Inc. Agent/Owner Name (please print) Die Created 9/28/2017 page 3 of 3 preareaus On bid Not On Lint Reason to Lot — No p MemoRi.me Detail by Entity Name Howard Limited eemry Compooy r no mrorma on FERIN Number NONE Daft Filed amMQ= swe FL � FORT OR infoliff Malline MCma � EAST OR STRIET tniatamd Agent Name & outdoors FORTo v I AWhereonlcl0efa ff Moore & opposite; OWN NOR � EAST OR imi CINGINNOTILOHpOi MReports NeAnnual Reports Filed vmzo-nape umime ua w Feel On jo Next On Let Return W Lot CIO Naples ILLC No ENdpz No Moore HIMM r $'om m 'z a m<IAn ��O r A.vy v i �Nv �'p m a _ D>> N OD cm l'I 0 :2 m D;D�� r o�Nv w p 0'o .p g mCS nm0 r xz'm01 rmr m < oa oNO,G ' mb v D O p IZ/IN Z.IyI 0ONm ti DO Z�SZC D VI fZ/1A�N � Z A.Ap 3=_=� C) NQ w OZn VIAND V ONDAy<<y N o0 Ow06 �e wO� c 3: r�Sz S cA V, A CCCDN AImmA 1+1�\>�~ A OWN W. O O5 OO" G -NO mm z ?00 6� O O �{� ''** '�T} T}[� ''T}T��m�I-� AfN�lZW N 0f7Nmym O ?�p mi 3 q6q D 11Y�Q 1`L�W.J�lYl[ul - - _ - - U�z a>o 0 0� lr�1 z mx z 3 znF Dow 0 m cmv�vm Ut m�D c� w cpi3s Ail mm0 cr- NMMG/ m R o Nf mSA D p vy' 0Mz- mmm o v=> p n CwN n F I o Oo CCF C A !nSA wz m�OZ D O. m Z C M A z v to z 0 W rlzlcZ m off" O�Dr�IC1 D o A w••w O (n I �W00 0 > o' OHO ry (D Ficmz D O wp- I > 00 =CO M . dw GJ Do = ; =I `�� > nn OI 3 Inn � �z �_ v �i mn m N l J n M l A 0 N p >' a o m 1N3Y135V3 mo �I v K a 01 N co o D ^ O t0 �o y C m nOi z> I 0i A>g ; M> o0i i z� I Iliam> m O x > D rnzzo Z v I ao N N ' z< W ggg D z -1 Z O I 8 N ma m y 00 2� N = I __ O8'ti8ll M „£ti,S0.Z0 N I I I 11, r� C mo l NlMatld 1 HdSV q N �j In o o I ONINtlVd IWKc SV �I N �Dm 'Em I O p r, c N ' 50.00 100.00' In s R 114 to D 00 Z z RI O N N z 5 � s Ou D MO Z F �' I y� u (D j� m F `^ z gg rn ,� I s M5E N z Im�l 5 c>>z 0 O m D O a YAg Z � oll m O mof n'I O M q� u v �?Z N N `�' Ez X A o I p Z O m N I q: I A Ax m m ?W I s O �N W Z s QD NOu' y u,N z Z a:V I m 00 CA Z I z r o N p m O 8 Im rn D M = m 0 t9 C 8 O �2fc Z ,va-e0� £8'ti8ll 3 „81,50.Z0 S a C_ aNn ua3aoad 1sVa ��; I p FI00 +8 •`$ I p 00 v I in o I� m A m z '^ I M C, I I m I Z 0. I qg m v mW I ,W I 4 I N I I I 9mz ZOA A zn A z 2 O (P 00 o&$ I gvl D �W W �m O 01 W i s LA. (DEED NORiFi O O 0 0 60 120 Feet O N m a' � m LLr \ Ew 0 Z Z m o �o� o v W � �s 3 r Mai 82' W � n q MARRIOTT 195' 195' s .� o 415' 100' 60' 70' O 55'45' 70' ` 3o o 30' VERIZON25'oCHASE WALMART 14STORAGE ; N 30' 0�111 \—CARWASH VACANT BLTJECORAL71-75 JULIET BLVD LAND BERMUDA PALMS Lu z V) Q m a w = ~ 2 w z W oc� Q in ~ = a a O Q J W LuLu % J W m J z J p[ Q Q z O O L% co co3 af THIS SITE PLAN IS CONCEPTUAL IN NATURE AND INTENDED FOR PLANNING PURPOSES ONLY. THE P OVERALL CONFIGURATION, DENSITY AND OR INTENSITY MAR,2021 �IGNERWA DEPICTED MAY CHANGE SIGNIFICANTLY BASED UPON SURVEY, ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL, AND/OR a �� DLP REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS. a 200079.00.00 n uuMaE OF March 23, 2021 2:57 PM K.•\2020\200079.00.00 Coral Blue Apartments - CPA & PUD\02 CPA Support\Working Docs\Exhibits\Building Heights Exhibit.dwg 0 30 60 120 Lu 44 f , { r - � '� z A. ,. Al �t r j t , BERMUDA PALMS` ' p - - w 3 4 - ice.` 1 QD OLn N t M l0 00 _ 15' TY 00 J 'B' BUFFER �' L 213' _� o — Ln ' --- 199'— ZZ o - - -- z rn C z +o ' - O .. N W O X cc � '190.4 - � - LN a� Q O - .5" I " x cn Ln O Q 113.2' W � `� 112.8' i O .o , ujW on Ln Lie 200. ILI oil 630' 25' PRINCIPAL SETBACK - % 20' _ CARLTON -- __--- _ LAKES —LIVINGSTON— LAKES JIM Lu V 15, TYPE �r Q 'B' BUFFER } °Cco uj j ,yam - V) Lu qh ..fib 1 ti FUTURE GERMAIN LEXUS DEALERSHIP ras AM � 4f, AOL-%, v "jIL V z w W O J J [[ V d H THIS SITE PLAN IS CONCEPTUAL IN NATURE AND INTENDED FOR PI ANNING PURPOSES ONLY. THE OVERALL CONFIGURATION, DENSITY AND OR DATE: DESIGNED: INTENSITY DEPICI ED MAY CHANGE SIGNIF TLY MAR.,2021 RWA BASED UPON SUFVEY, ENGINEERING, SEC: TWP: RGE: DRAWN: ENVIRONMENTAL, AND/OR REG ORY DLP REQUIREMENTS. PROJECT No.: 200079.00.00 SHEET NUMBER: March 23, 2021 2.38 PM K.'\2020\200079.00.00 Coral Blue Apartments - CPA & PUD\02 CPA SupportMorking Docs\Exhibits\Setbacks Exhibitdwg 1 OF Immokalee Road Interchange Residential Infill Subdistrict "4t a.k.a. BLUE CORAL A P A R T M E N T S r 0 Proiect Background: The subject property is approximately 9.35 acres of undeveloped agricultural zoned land located on the south side of Immokalee Road, just west of Juliet Boulevard and east of Livingston Road.Zoning for the property to the west is a residential PUD, the property to the South is the LivingstonLakes Residential PUD, the land to the North is the Immokalee road right of way and the propertyto the east is currently undergoing GMPA/PUD rezone that would propose a luxury automotive dealership. k T:77 '? w . - = • '��" �ti. 'µsr '�'S� ,�:, -. •� i .�. y�,`� - �.yE„ �r y� � � .�_ •c� a� "� � ,„_� ��.�"-'��n�_ �h'rd.'°��5.��`�_, ', �A ��RR�.*If�C'w�F �: The subject property lies within the Urban Mixed Use District, Urban Residential Subdistrict and is within the Immokalee Interchange Activity Center Density Band The current zoningforthe property is agricultural zoningand currently qualifies to be rezoned to residential. Request: The purpose of thisapplication is to amend the Growth Management Plan (GMP) to establish the Immokalee Interchange Residential Infill Subdistrict. This subdistrict is intended to allow a higher density multi -family rental development that is consistent and compatible with and complementary to the Interchange Activity Center Subdistrict and advances Housing and Transportation goals, objectives and policies outlined the Growth Management Plan. Moreover, the proposed subdistrict is consistent with and implements numerous recommendations of the ULI Advisory Services Panel Report on Expanding Housing Affordability in Collier County. 4/2/21 Immokalee Road Interchange Residential Infill Subdistrict - 2 - The proposed subdistrict will accommodate the development of an urban -style luxury rental community that will offer studio, one bedroom, two bedroom and three bedroom residences. This project will be required to go through the Planned Unit Development (PUDZ) rezoning process to obtain approval. The proposed project is in an ideal location for increased density. It is along a major thoroughfare, in close proximity to the Immokalee 175 interchange, and almost immediately abutting Mixed Use Activity Center #4, which is home to a mix of uses and significant commercial intensity. The resulting project will provide an excellent transition from the high intensity commercial use proposed on the property directly east of the subject property and the residential condominiums directly west of the subject property. r a _ti = r* �r M. o2 - J _ J 410 -� 4/2/21 Immokalee Road Interchange Residential Infill Subdistrict - 3 - PROJECT NARRATIVE & EXPLANATION/JUSTIFICATION OF GMPA Reauest Protect Description: The proposed Blue Coral multi -family residential development will bring a much needed residential product to the market serving the Northwest Collier County sub -market. The development will include 280living units in a highly amenitized urban style community that will respond to the needsof the Collier County workforce that currently commutes from more affordable residential areas totheir jobs in the County. By design, the development will incorporate unitsthat are smaller in square footage to create workforce affordability. The Developer will work with the Collier County Housing Authority to create subsidies to allow a percentage of units to be affordable to residents making less than 80%; 80% to 90%; and 90%-100% of the average median income. Developer is proposing to offer twenty-five percent (25%) or 70 of the total units to be rented to Essential Service Personnel, of which 35 will be households earning between <80-100% of the Adjusted Median Income (AMI) for Collier County. Preference for these units will be given to Essential Service Personnel (ESP). These are individuals or families where at least one of whom is employed as police or fire personnel, a childcare worker, a teacher or other educational personnel, health care personnel, a public employee, or a service worker. These "affordable units" will be offered for a period of 30 years after completion of construction. 4/2/21 Immokalee Road Interchange Residential Infill Subdistrict - 4 - To assist in creating affordability, we are proposing a density of 30 units per acre. While this density is higher than permitted under the existing Growth Management Plan, this density is standard in manyother Florida markets and is significantly lower than densities permitted in Sarasota, Ft. Lauderdale, Miami and Tampa. More importantly, higher density is appropriate when a project is adjacent to or in close proximity to an interstatehighway and on a major thoroughfare. Traditional thinking suggests that this type of densitycreates a burden on highways and infrastructure, but the reality is that these "urban type" developments actually reduce the numbers of tripsmade on a daily basis. Additionally, this location provides walkability to a variety of commercialestablishments, not the least of which is the newly opened Seed to Table grocery and lifestyle market. The proposed development incorporates a significant number of smaller units (studios and one bedroom units) ranging from 550 square feet up to approximately 750 square feet. Based onthe smaller size of these units, the gross rent is less, thus providing greater affordability. With the documented influx of younger workers and two income families into southwest Florida, this more urban development located adjacent toan activity center and in walking distance to essential services makes perfect sense. Much of the current roadway congestion results from workers employed in Collier County having to commute to other areas to find quality housing with full amenity packages at a reasonable price. Many of these workers are commuting from Estero, Ft. Myers and Cape Coral because they cannot find any affordability in the Collier County area. 'Jill ZY goo r -� r� � 'r Ar PWr . ' I '" L{ eY 4/2/21 Immokalee Road Interchange Residential Infill Subdistrict - 5 - The proposed development will offer a rangeof amenities, both in the living units and in community spaces. Every unit in the developmentwill include stainless steel appliance packages, granite or quartz countertops, vinyl wood plank flooring, washers and dryers, walk in closets, designer lighting and cabinetry, nine -foot ceilings, upscale bathroom finishes, patios or balconies inselect units and cell phone app control of basic home functions. Amenity use by residents will notrequire any additional parking than what is required for the residential units. Access and use of the community facilities is private for residents and their guests only. Other than the leasing office, the proposed development will not require any additional parking spaces beyond the de- mand that from residents. All residents in the community will enjoy development amenities. Some of these will include the following: two saltwater swimming pools, Jacuzzi, an expansive club room with TV's and entertainment stations and a community kitchen, game room, golf simulator, business center with computers and printer, fitness center with aerobic equipment and free weights, a pet grooming spaand dog park, covered parking, electric vehicle charging stations, and an outdoor grilling area and kitchen. This amenity package will encourage residents to spend more time at the community, encourage walking to nearby services and vendors, and generally reduce the amount of automobile traffic in the immediate vicinity of the development. This higher density development will utilize the nearby areas of commerce, which is the antithesis of historical urban sprawl. r old t 4/2/21 Immokalee Road Interchange Residential Infill Subdistrict - 6 - Justification: The proposed Immokalee Interchange Residential Infill Subdistrict and the proposed higher density is appropriate for the area and can be justified for the following reasons: Appropriate Location The proposed location is in the urban area, in close proximity to a major Interchange Activity Center, in a density band, along a major transportation corridor, and close to public transit. The proposed subdistrict and the proposed car dealership east of the subject property represent a natural extension of Activity Center 4. As stated in the Affordable Housing LDC Amendments that will soon go to public hearing, Activity Centers in the Urban District are areas where the greatest densities and intensities are anticipated. This location represents areas where the transportation system and public infrastructure are available. Moreover, those areas are mixed -use nodes that encourage and support higher densities since they provide goods, services and entertainment in close proximity to the residential units. These nodes encourage transit and through proper interconnection also promote and support bicycle and pedestrian modes of transportation. Page 27 of the ULI report recommends to "Target Certain Activity Centers for Significantly Higher Density with the Provision of Mixed -Income Housing." Further, page 26 of the report states that, "Although difficult to develop, projects in the urban areas of the county can yield great benefits by placing residents near existing transit, employment, shopping, and other daily needs and by reducing strain on existing infrastructure." Infill Project The proposed subdistrict and companion Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) represents an infill project for which the Growth Management Plan allows a density bonus recognizing that smaller lots can be challenging to develop and that infilling appropriate areas provide benefits from an urbanization, public infrastructure, transportation standpoint. Additionally, the proposed subdistrict sits between the proposed car dealership and commercial uses to the east and multi -family residential to the south. This infill project provides a favorable land use intensity transition from the more intense commercial uses to the less intense residential communities. As stated on page 25 of the ULI report, "...infill sites in already developed areas of the county are challenging to consolidate, may need to address adjacent uses and neighborhood concerns, and often require additional density to make the financially feasible." The subdistrict will limit future development to residential multi -family only and will provide assurance that more intense commercial uses will not be developed on the property that abuts existing multi -family to the south. The PUD will also include setback, buffering height limits and landscaping that will ensure compatibility with adjacent properties. 4/2/21 Immokalee Road Interchange Residential Infill Subdistrict - 7 - Affordable Housing Commitment The proposed density of 30 units per acre is consistent with ULI's Report on Expanding Housing Affordability in Collier County published in 2017. Page 27 of the report recommends strengthening the Affordable Housing Density Bonus (AHDB) Program as a means of making it financially feasible for market rate developers to provide affordable housing in site. "...the number of residential units allowed per acre should be significantly increased. For example, 30 units per acre may be a more realistic maximum density to properly incentivize market rate developers to provide affordable housing." The proposed subdistrict provides a clear commitment to provide affordable housing for 30 years and preference to Essential Service Personnel, which is consistent with the ULI report that emphasizes the need to provide housing affordability for Collier County's workforce in order to have a sustainable economy and great quality of life. As stated on page 8 of the report, "housing affordability affects all segments of the community..." and on page 18, "Local employers will continue to have difficulty hiring and retaining employees in the county, which will create a "brain drain" out of the community...." Moreover, the ULI report sees an overwhelming need for affordable rental units, which is mandated by this subdistrict. The report also explains how providing "multifamily rental housing is the most cost-effective way to provide housing that is affordable to the average working person" and as such, recommends greater densities as an incentives to the development community. Transportation Benefits The proposed subdistrict provides the benefit of locating higher densities in close proximity to employment centers, shopping and entertainment, which is consistent with sound planning and transportation practices. This land use pattern supports and promotes transit, bicycle and pedestrian modes of transportation. 600 NCH NORTH NAPLES Piper Blvd ® an Ca cocuER AREa,AaNs�, Immokalee Rd F O© Immokalee Rd Creekside IT a� 73 m W a Y Q C ® Y LL d a p ® rn Q c N 0 ¢ N 0 a J Vanderbilt Beach Road 5 0 4/2/21 Immokalee Road Interchange Residential Infill Subdistrict - 8 - The ULI report (pg 16) also explains that "Crucial to the cost -burden conversation is the combination of housing cost and transportation cost." As people have to "drive to qualify', we create a pattern in which we increase vehicle miles travelled, tax the existing infrastructure and erode our quality of life. In addition to these benefits of increased density in the right locations, the proposed subdistrict will provide very important site -specific improvements that will benefit the existing transportation system, roadway safety and reduce trips on Immokalee Road. FUTURE ACCESS l ♦WWFUTURE ��i♦��1 ACCESS\\�l Y Y r r 4/2/21 Immokalee Road Interchange Residential Infill Subdistrict - 9 - As depicted on the two exhibits above, the project will provide a joint access with the adjacent property to the east, reducing access points along Immokalee Road, reducing potential conflicts and improving safety conditions. Moreover, the project in collaboration with the property to the east, will create a "frontage road" that will allow connection to the Activity Center uses, the Walmart Superstore and the transit stop at that location. The project will also provide a potential interconnection to Bermuda Palms should that community want the connection. The frontage road will reduce trips onto Immokalee Road and will enable bicycle and pedestrian access to the commercial uses within the Activity Center. Urban Density As we know, Collier County is expected to grow significantly in population by 2040. Collier county with its outstanding quality of life will continue to attract in -migration and annual visitors. The current COVID-19 pandemic has most likely accelerated that growth. In order to meet the County's housing needs and to minimize sprawl, the county has made it a priority to accommodate growth in the urban areas. Urban densities in the right locations, as proposed for this subdistrict, creates numerous benefits described above. In addition to housing, transportation, affordability, transit, quality of life and sprawl benefits, it is important to note that increased density can be achieved in a form that is attractive and compatible with adjacent uses. 4/2/21 Immokalee Road Interchange Residential Infill Subdistrict - 10 - The ULI report (pg 21) points to "examples of this type of increased density include Bayfront and Naples Square, at more than 20-30 units per acre rather than the average 2.5 units per acre in other residential communities." There are numerous examples of recent, attractive and desirable multi -family projects where the density on net acre basis far exceeds the county's current 16 du/ac limitation. Some of these include Magnolia Square that has 290 units on approximately 10.5 acres for a density of 27.5 du/ac; One Naples which was recently approved for approximately 26 du/ac, Addies Corner with a net density of approximately 24 du/ac; Vanderbilt Way with 48 units on 2.5 acres for a density of 19.2 du/ac; and Orchid Run with 281 units on 16,19 net acres for density of 17.4 du/ac. These projects demonstrate that higher density has a place in Collier County and can be compatible, attractive and successful when done at human scale and located in appropriate areas. Similar to the proposed project, the examples above are typically 4-stories in height and located within a mixed -use project or in vicinity to a complementary commercial node. The following photos of the Orchid Run project demonstrates how a higher density project can be attractive and consistent with the community character and the level of quality expected in Collier County. The photos below also demonstrate that people do not experience and react to form and not density figures. If the form is right people will like a project and enjoy their interaction with the built environments 4/2/21 Immokalee Road Interchange Residential Infill Subdistrict - 11 - Site Design/Setbacks/Buffers In addition to the aesthetics of the proposed project, careful attention was paid to the location of the building onsite, the scale of the building, the landscaping, the amenities provided and the setbacks and buffering from adjacent properties. These items are addressed in detail as part of the companion PUDZ application, however the following exhibits below address these compatibility issues. As can be seen from the height and massing exhibit, the proposed apartments provide a natural transition from the commercial uses to the east and provide significant separation from Bermuda Palms to mitigate for the height differential. The setback exhibit shows that the proposed project far exceeds standard setback requirements. The proposed building was designed and located on the site in such a way as to mitigate the height differential with Bermuda Palms and to ensure compatibility. The building is articulated and provides 2 large courtyards to break up the massing and to provide landscaped areas facing Bermuda Palms. The actual building height including any parapet wall will not exceed 55 feetfrom grade. The parking garage, which is built-in the overall structure will be two levels and will not exceed 30 feet from grade. At its closest, the proposed structure is approximately 84' from the western property boundary and approximately 190' from the neighboring residences. The Collier County LDC acknowledges that potential compatibility challenges can arise between different uses and requires mandatory setbacks and buffering between uses. The Collier LDC requires 50' setbacks from Industrial PUDs to residential zoning districts (Sec 4.07.03), and per Site Design Standards in Sec 4.02.01, standard Industrial zoning districts only require 50' setbacks from residential uses. Moreover, noisy or "impactful" uses such as Car Washes only require 50' setbacks from abutting residential. To the south of the property the proposed apartments are approximately 180' form the property line, where most of this area is a densely vegetated preserve with pines measuring up to 65'. The closest Livingston Lakes residences are over 272' from the proposed structure. Lastly, the project exceeds buffer requirement on the two sides that it abuts residential uses. The code requires 10' Type A buffers where residential multi -family uses abut each other. Along the western boundary a 15' Type B buffer is proposed and as mentioned above a wide, densely -vegetated preserve is proposed along the south. Height and Massing Comparison Exhibit Y: 41E MARRI0'T 60 70' 1UC' - WALf.1ART VERIZON 25' - CHASE a rt as' VACANr BLUE CORAL '- - IULIEI BLV'CARWAEH LAND 9ERMUOA PALMS 4/2/21 Immokalee Road Interchange Residential Infill Subdistrict - 12 - Line of Sight — Southern Boundary TRACT B 1 ..i�i!%slws!i coo TL IIIIIIIII CORAL APART x et i Line of Sight — Northern Boundary so= R R —MM u RscnPeo 6Wf CORAL APARTMENTS 1ES1 MOYJrLff ROW 100'CANALfASfMfM 60'BIIFFfR 91'i IAKES _ S= _ 7 A .. TweEo•- - Ex raps RJ REEs G � o 4/2/21 Immokalee Road Interchange Residential Infill Subdistrict - 14 - CONSISTENCY WITH THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT, ULi's HOUSING AFFORDABILITY RECOMMENDATIONS AND PROPOSED HOUSING AFFORDABILITY LDC AMENDMENTS: The proposed subdistrict is consistent with the Growth Management Plan, ULI's Housing Affordability Recommendations and proposed Housing Affordability LDC amendments in that it complies with or implements the intent of these documents. In summary, the Immokalee Interchange Infill Residential Subdistrict is compliant and consistent with the aforementioned documents and request higher density for the following reasons: 1. It implements housing affordability recommendations from ULI and provides affordable housing for a period of 30 years. 2. It offers a project that provides rental units and diversifies Collier County's housing stock. 3. It proposes higher density in a location adjacent to a Mixed-Use/Interchange Activity Center, which is an area designated to allow the highest densities and intensities in the County. 4. It proposes higher density on an infill parcel that will serve as a transition from more intense commercial uses to lower intensity multi -family residential communities. 5. It proposes higher density along a major transit corridor and in very close proximity to two major transit stops (North Collier Regional Park and the Immokalee Walmart Supercenter) 6. It proposes joint access with the adjacent planned automobile dealership thus limiting access points along Immokalee Road, and improving traffic and safety conditions. 7. It allows the development of a "frontage road" with interconnection among projects and direct access to the Walmart Commercial plaza thereby reducing trips onto Immokalee Road and Vehicle Miles Traveled. 8. It is consistent with Transit Oriented Development principles and encourages bicycle and pedestrian modes for local convenience shopping. 9. It proposes higher density to help mitigate Collier County's high costs of land, impact fees and regulatory approvals, as well as the rapidly escalating material and construction costs. 10. It proposes a project that must go through the public hearing process and must demonstrate compatibility through PUD process. 11. It requires an affordable housing commitment for a period of 30 years, and requires it to be memorialized via a Developer Agreement, PUD Developer Commitments or rezoning conditions of approval. 12. It provides a quality project that must demonstrate the demand for proposed housing product through a market study. 13. It provides an attractive human -scale multi -family community that provides appealing architecture, amenities and landscaping since people experience form not density. The proposed density on a net acreage is consistent with several desirable multi -family projects in Collier County. 4/2/21 Immokalee Road Interchange Residential Infill Subdistrict - 15 - Growth Management Plan Consistency: The following excerpts demonstrates consistency with the concepts principles, goals objectives and policies in the Growth Management Plan. Future Land Use Element (FLUE) The Overview explains the intent and concepts behind the land use regulations and the allocation of development to certain areas of the County. An overarching theme is "to protect and manage natural resource systems" by directing growth to urban designated areas stated as follows: Urban Designated Areas on the Future Land Use Map are located and configured to guide concentrated population growth and intensive land development away from areas of great sensitivity and toward areas more tolerant to development. Furthermore, the FLUE establishes the Use of Activities Centers as a means of concentrating future development in appropriate urban areas that help minimize urban sprawl and promote an efficient use of public infrastructure as stated below: The Mixed Use Activity Centers are intended to provide for concentrated commercial and mixed use development but with carefully configured access to the road network. Superior urban design is therefore promoted by carefully managing road access, avoiding strip commercial development, improving overall circulation patterns, and providing for community focal points. Policy 4.7: Access Management Plan provisions have been developed for Mixed Use and Interchange Activity Centers designated on the Future Land Use Map and these provisions have been incorporated into the Collier County Land Development Code. The intent of the Access Management Plan provisions is defined by the following guidelines and principles: a. The number of ingress and egress points shall be minimized and shall be combined and signalized to the maximum extent possible. b. Spacing of access points shall meet, to the maximum extent possible, the standards set forth in the Collier County Access Control Policy (Resolution No. 01-247, adopted June 26, 2001). c. Access points and turning movements shall be located and designed to minimize interference with the operation of existing and planned interchanges and intersections. d. Developers of lots, parcels, and subdivisions shall be encouraged to dedicate crossaccess easements, rights -of -way, and limited access easements, as necessary and appropriate, in order to ensure compliance with the above -mentioned standards (a. — c.) Objective 5: Implement land use policies that promote sound planning, protect environmentally sensitive lands and habitat for listed species while protecting private property rights, ensure compatibility of land uses and further the implementation of the Future Land Use Element. Policy 5.5: Discourage unacceptable levels of urban sprawl in order to minimize the cost of community facilities by: confining urban intensity development to areas designated as Urban on the Future Land Use Map .... 4/2/21 Immokalee Road Interchange Residential Infill Subdistrict - 16 - OBJECTIVE 7: Promote smart growth policies, reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and adhere to the existing development character of the Collier County, where applicable, and as follows: Policy 7. 1: The County shall encourage developers and property owners to connect their properties to fronting collector and arterial roads, except where no such connection can be made without violating intersection spacing requirements of the Land Development Code. Policy 7.3: All new and existing developments shall be encouraged to connect their local streets and/or interconnection points with adjoining neighborhoods or other developments regardless of land use type. The interconnection of local streets between developments is also addressed in Policy 9.3 of the Transportation Element. Policy 7.4: The County shall encourage new developments to provide walkable communities with a blend of densities, common open spaces, civic facilities and a range of housing prices and types. Housing Element GOAL 1: TO CREATE AN ADEQUATE SUPPLY OF DECENT, SAFE, SANITARY, AND AFFORDABLE HOUSING FOR ALL RESIDENTS OF COLLIER COUNTY. OBJECTIVE 1: Provide new affordable housing units in order to meet the current and future housing needs of legal residents with very -low, low, moderate and affordable workforce incomes, including households with special needs such as rural and farmworker housing in rural Collier County OBJECTIVE 2: Increase the number of affordable housing units, by the methods contained in Objective 1 and subsequent Policies, for very -low, low, moderate and affordable workforce income residents with the assistance of for -profit and not -for -profit providers of affordable housing, within the County and its municipalities Policy 2.2: Partnerships shall be encouraged between private developers, non-profit entities, local governments and other interested parties to ensure the development of housing that meets the needs of the County's very - low, low, moderate and affordable workforce income residents. Policy 2.4: The County shall, with the City of Naples, continue to review existing codes and ordinances and amend them as needed to allow for flexible and innovative residential design that encourages mixed use development with a variety of housing designs, styles, and price ranges. Transportation Element OBJECTIVE 7: Develop and adopt standards for safe and efficient ingress and egress to adjoining properties, and encourage safe and convenient on -site traffic circulation through the development review process. Policy 9.3: The County shall require, wherever feasible, the interconnection of local streets between developments to facilitate convenient movement throughout the road network. The LDC shall identify the circumstances and conditions that would require the interconnection of neighboring developments, and shall also develop standards 4/2/21 Immokalee Road Interchange Residential Infill Subdistrict - 17 - and criteria for the safe interconnection of such local streets. OBJECTIVE 12: Encourage the efficient use of transit services now and in the future. 4/2/21 Immokalee Road Interchange Residential Infill Subdistrict - 18 - Coder County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT MM.colliergoy.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Application for a Public Hearing for PUD Rezone, Amendment to PUD or PUD to PUD Rezone PETITION NO PROJECT NAME To be completed by staff DATE PROCESSED ❑� PUD Rezone (PUDZ): LDC subsection 10.02.13 A.-F., Ch. 3 G. 1 of the Administrative Code ❑ Amendment to PUD (PUDA): LDC subsection 10.02.13 E. and Ch. 3 G. 2 of the Administrative Code ❑ PUD to PUD Rezone (PUDR): LDC subsection 10.02.13 A.-F. Name of Property Owner(s): APPLICANT CONTACT INFORMATION William C Scherer Trust c/o Excel Real Estate Name of Applicant if different than owner: CIG Naples, LLC. Address: 226 East 8th St. City: Cincinnati State: OH Telephone: (513)246-1985 Cell: (513)659-6181 E-Mail Address: gregg.fusaro@cigproperties.com Name of Agent: Tom Barber Firm: Agnoli, Barber & Brundage Inc. Address: 7400 Trail Blvd Suite 200 Telephone: (239)597-3111 Cell: City: Naples E-Mail Address: tom.barber@abbinc.com ZIP: 45202 Fax. (513) 241-9390 State: FL ZIP: 34108 Fax: (239)254-2839 Be aware that Collier County has lobbyist regulations. Guide yourself accordingly and ensure that you are in compliance with these regulations. February 1, 2019 Page 1 of 11 Coder County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239)252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 REZONE REQUEST This application is requesting a rezone from: Agd-ftwal Zoning district(s) to the PUD zoning district(s). Present Use of the Property: Vacant Proposed Use (or range of uses) of the property: Residential Original PUD Name: Ordinance No.: N/A N/A PROPERTY INFORMATION On a separate sheet attached to the application, provide a detailed legal description of the property covered by the application: • If the request involves changes to more than one zoning district, the applicant shall include a separate legal description for property involved in each district; • The applicant shall submit 4 copies of a recent survey (completed within the last six months, maximum 1" to 400' scale), if required to do so at the pre -application meeting; and • The applicant is responsible for supplying the correct legal description. If questions arise concerning the legal description, an engineer's certification or sealed survey may be required. Section/Township/Range:3o 4e 26 Lot: Block: Subdivision: Metes & Bounds Description: Plat Book: Page #: Property I.D. Number: 00198000006 Size of Property: ft. x ft. = Total Sq. Ft. Acres: 935 Address/ General Location of Subject Property: South side Immokalee Rd. between 1-75 and Livingston Rd. PUD District (refer to LDC subsection 2.03.06 Q ❑ Commercial ■❑ Residential ❑ Community Facilities ❑ Mixed Use ❑ Other: ❑ Industrial February 1, 2019 Page 2 of 11 Cotl'ter County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239)252-2400 FAX: 1239) 252-6358 ADJACENT ZONING AND LAND USE Zoning Land Use N Carlton Lakes PUD Residential S Livingston Lakes PUD Residential E AG and Gasper Station PUD Agricultural and Commerical W Eboli PUD Bermuda Palms Residential Condo If the owner of the subject property owns contiguous property please provide a detailed legal description of the entire contiguous property on a separate sheet attached to the application. Section/Township/Range: Lot: Block: Subdivision: Plat Book: Page #f: Property I.D. Number: Metes & Bounds Description: ASSOCIATIONS Required: List all registered Home Owner Association(s) that could be affected by this petition. Provide additional sheets if necessary. Information can be found on the Board of County Commissioner's website at http://www.colliergov.net/Index.aspx?page=774. Name of Homeowner Association: Livingston Lakes Condominium Assocation Mailing Address: 4670 Cardinal way, 302. City: Naples Name of Homeowner Association: Bermuda Palms A Condominium Mailing Address: 4910 Cougar CT N City: Naples Name of Homeowner Association: Carlton Lakes PUD Association Mailing Address: 3150 Safe Harbor Dr. City: Naples Name of Homeowner Association: Pelican Strand Association Mailing Address: 9300 N. 16th St. City: Name of Homeowner Association: Mailing Address: City: State: FL ZIP: 34112 State: FL ZIP: 34109 State: FL ZIP: 33619 Tampa State: FL ZIP: 33619 State: ZIP: February 1, 2019 Page 3 of 11 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net Co1[ier County EVALUATION CRITERIA 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Pursuant to LDC subsections 10.02.13 B, 10.02.08 F and Chapter 3 G. of the Administrative Code, staffs analysis and recommendation to the Planning Commission, and the Planning Commission's recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners shall be based upon consideration of the applicable criteria. On a separate sheet attached to the application, provide a narrative statement describing the rezone request with specific reference to the criteria below. Include any backup materials and documentation in support of the request. a. The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer, water, and other utilities. b. Adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of any proposed agreements, contract, or other instruments, or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense. Findings and recommendations of this type shall be made only after consultation with the county attorney. C. Conformity of the proposed PUD with the goals, objectives and policies of the Growth Management Plan. (This is to include identifying what Sub -district, policy or other provision allows the requested uses/density, and fully explaining/addressing all criteria or conditions of that Sub -district, policy or other provision.) d. The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening requirements. e. The adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the development. f. The timing or sequence of development for the purpose of assuring the adequacy of available improvements and facilities, both public and private. g. The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion. h. Conformity with PUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the particular case, based on determination that such modifications of justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations. Deed Restrictions: The County is legally precluded from enforcing deed restrictions; however, many communities have adopted such restrictions. You may wish to contact the civic or property owners association in the area for which this use is being requested in order to ascertain whether or not the request is affected by existing deed restrictions. February 1, 2019 Page 4 of 11 Co*er County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Previous land use petitions on the subject property: To your knowledge, has a public hearing been held on this property within the last year? If so, what was the nature of that hearing? No Official Interpretations or Zoning Verifications: To your knowledge, has there been an official interpretation or zoning verification rendered on this property within the last year? ❑ Yes ■❑ No if so please provide copies. PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIREMENTS This land use petition requires a Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM), pursuant to Chapter 3 E. of the Administrative Code and LDC section 10.03.06. Following the NIM, the applicant will submit a written summary and any commitments that have been made at the meeting. Refer to Chapter 8 B. of the Administrative Code for the NIM procedural requirements. Chapter 8 of the Administrative Code requires that the applicant must remove their public hearing advertising sign(s) after final action is taken by the Board of County Commissioners. Based on the Board's final action on this item, please remove all public hearing advertising sign(s) immediately. RECORDING OF DEVELOPER COMMITMENTS Within 30 days of adoption of the Ordinance, the owner or developer (specify name) at their expense shall record in the Public Records of Collier County a Memorandum of Understanding of Developer Commitments or Notice of Developer Commitments that contains the legal description of the property that is the subject of the land use petition and contains each and every commitment of the owner or developer specified in the Ordinance. The Memorandum or Notice shall be in form acceptable to the County and shall comply with the recording requirements of Chapter 695, F5. A recorded copy of the Memorandum or Notice shall be provided to the Collier County Planned Unit Development Monitoring staff within 15 days of recording of said Memorandum or Notice. LDC subsection 10.02.08 D This application will be considered "open" when the determination of "sufficiency" has been made and the application is assigned a petition processing number. The application will be considered "closed" when the petitioner withdraws the application through written notice or ceases to supply amendment or change, for a period of 6 months. An application deemed "closed" will not receil further processing and an application "closed" through inactivity shall be deemed withdrawn. F application deemed "closed" may be re -opened by submission of a new application, repayment all application fees and the grant of a determination of "sufficiency". Further review of the reque will be subiect to the then current code. February 1, 2019 Page 5 of 11 CiOLL1er County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 STATEMENT OF UTILITY PROVISIONS FOR PUD REZONE REQUEST APPLICANT CONTACT INFORMATION Name of Applicant(s): CIG Naples, LLC Address: 226 East 8th St. City: Cincinnati State: OH ZIP: 45202 Telephone: (513)246-1985 Cell: (513)659-6181 E-Mail Address: gregg.fusaro@cigproperties.com Address of Subject Property (If available): N/A City: Naples State: FL ZIP: 34110 PROPERTY INFORMATION Section/Township/Range:30 /48 /26 Lot: Block: Subdivision: Fax: (513)241-9390 Metes & Bounds Description: 30,48,26 W 1/2 of E 1/2 of NW 1/4, Less N 100ft R/W Plat Book: 5460 Page #: 132 Property I.D. Number: 00198000006 TYPE OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL TO BE PROVIDED Check applicable system: a. County Utility System b. City Utility System ❑ C. Franchised Utility System ❑ Provide Name: Collier County Utilities d. Package Treatment Plant ❑ (GPD Capacity): e. Seotic Svstem F1 I TYPE OF WATER SERVICE TO BE PROVIDED I Check applicable system: a. County Utility System 12 b. City Utility System ❑ C. Franchised Utility System ❑ d. Private System (Well) ❑ Provide Name: Collier County Utilities Total Population to be Served: 700 (2.5 people per Dwelling Unit) Peak and Average Daily Demands: A. Water -Peak: 135,986GPD Average Daily: 100,730GPD B. Sewer -Peak: 107,925GPD Average Daily: 71,950GPD If proposing to be connected to Collier County Regional Water System, please provide the date service is expected to be required: June 2021 February 1, 2019 Page 6 of 11 Cotl'ier County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239)252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Narrative statement: Provide a brief and concise narrative statement and schematic drawing of sewage treatment process to be used as well as a specific statement regarding the method of affluent and sludge disposal. If percolation ponds are to be used, then percolation data and soil involved shall be provided from tests prepared and certified by a professional engineer. Please see attached. Collier County Utility Dedication Statement: If the project is located within the service boundaries of Collier County's utility service system, a notarized statement shall be provided agreeing to dedicate the water distribution and sewage collection facilities within the project area to the Collier County Utilities. This shall occur upon completion of the construction of these facilities in accordance with all applicable County ordinances in effect at that time. This statement shall also include an agreement that the applicable system development charges and connection fees will be paid to the County Utilities Division prior to the issuance of building permits by the County. If applicable, the statement shall contain an agreement to dedicate the appropriate utility easements for serving the water and sewer systems. Statement of Availability Capacity from other Providers: Unless waived or otherwise provided for at the pre -application meeting, if the project is to receive sewer or potable water services from any provider other than the County, a statement from that provider indicating adequate capacity to serve the project shall be provided. February 1, 2019 Page 7 of 11 COitieV County PL20190001600 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252.6358 COVENANT OF UNIFIED CONTROL The undersigned do hereby swear or affirm that we are the fee simple titleholders and owners of record of property commonly known as ajjo # 00198000006 Sec 30. Tovvnshp 48-Range 26 W 1/2 of E 1/2 of NW 114 of NW4/4, Less N 100 Ft. Collier County, Florida (street address and City, State and Zip Code) and legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto. The P-Uprroperty described herein is the subject of an application forgb,Arnrai nnartmentsplanned unit development (_ L PUD) zoning. We hereby designate_ Thomas D. Barber, legal representative thereof, as the legal representatives of the property and as such, these individuals are authorized to legally bind all owners of the property in the course of seeking the necessary approvals to develop. This authority Includes, but Is not limited to, the hiring and authorization of agents to assist In the preparation of applications, plans, surveys, and studies necessary to obtain zoning approval on the site. These representatives will remain the only entity to authorize development activity on the property until such time as a new or amended covenant of unified control is delivered to Collier County. The undersigned recognize the following and will be guided accordingly in the pursuit of development of the project: 1. The property will be developed and used in conformity with the approved master plan including all conditions placed on the development and all commitments agreed to by the applicant in connection with the planned unit development rezoning. 2. The legal representative identified herein is responsible for compliance with all terms, conditions, safeguards, and stipulations made at the time of approval of the master plan, even if the property is subsequently sold in whole or in part, unless and until a new or amended covenant of unified control is delivered to and recorded by Collier County. 3. A departure from the provisions of the approved plans or a failure to comply with any requirements, conditions, or safeguards provided for in the planned unit development process will constitute a violation of the Land Development Code. 4. All terms and conditions of the planned unit development approval will be incorporated into covenants and restrictions which run with the land so as to provide notice to subsequent owners that all development activity within the planned unit development must be consistent with those terms and conditions. S. So long as this covenant is in force, Collier County can, upon the discovery of noncompliance with the terms, safeguards, and conditions of the planned unit development, seek equitable relief as necessary to compel compliance. The County will not issue permits, certificates, or licenses to occupy or use any part of the planned unit development d the County may stop ongoing construction activity until the project is brought Into compliance with III terrri�, cpr ions and safeguards of the planned unit development. Oe'r U I�efad Owner Printed Name printed Name �,FA•FE F�-ft• RFl,9i,A) d)1 tcJct r l AS tot(b af}#irmed) Ad subscribed before me this �t day of by who is personally known to me or has produced -I be 5 C 1Ce IL LC as Identification. d.Xt rG -�hr\ UCN _t i Notary Public (Name typed, printed or ed AANNGf Notary Public Slsie of Michlr)nn County of wnyne )My Commission Expires Apr 11. ;01R Acting in the County of l[ �"¢" t.�b L February 1. 2019 Page 8 of 11 Collier County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net Final Submittal Requirement Checklist for: ❑ PUD Rezone- Ch. 3 G. 1 of the Administrative Code ❑ Amendment to PUD- Ch. 3 G. 2 of the Administrative Code ❑ PUD to PUD Rezone- Ch. 3 G. 1 of the Administrative Code 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 The following Submittal Requirement checklist is to be utilized during the Pre -Application Meeting and at time of application submittal. At final submittal, the checklist is to be completed and submitted with an up-to-date application. Please provide the submittal items in the exact order listed below, with cover sheets attached to each section. Incomplete submittals will not be accepted. A Model PUD Document is available online at http://www.colliercountvfl.gov/Home/ShowDocument?id=76983. REQUIREMENTS COPIES REQUIRED NOT REQUIRED Cover Letter with Narrative Statement including a detailed description of why amendment is necessary 1 ❑ ❑ Completed Application with required attachments (download latest version) 1 Pre -application meeting notes 1 0 ❑ Affidavit of Authorization signed and notarized 1 Property Ownership Disclosure Form 1 Notarized and completed Covenant of Unified Control 1 Completed Addressing Checklist 1 Warranty Deed(s) 1 0 ❑ List Identifying Owner and all parties of corporation 1 0 ❑ Signed and sealed Boundary Survey 1 ❑ ❑ Architectural Rendering of proposed structures 1 ❑ ❑ Current Aerial Photographs (available from Property Appraiser) with project boundary and, if vegetated, FLUCFCS Codes with legend included on aerial. 1 ❑ ❑ Statement of Utility Provisions 1 ❑ ❑ Environmental Data Requirements pursuant to LDC section 3.08.00 1 ❑ ❑ Environmental Data Requirements collated into a single Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) packet at time of public hearings. Coordinate with project planner at time of public hearings. ❑ 0 ❑ Listed or Protected Species survey, less than 12 months old. Include copies of previous surveys. 1 ❑ ❑ Traffic Impact Study 1 El ❑ Historical Survey 1 ❑ ❑ School Impact Analysis Application, if applicable 1 ❑ 1 ❑ Electronic copy of all required documents 1 El ❑ Completed Exhibits A-F (see below for additional information)* ❑ ❑ ❑ List of requested deviations from the LDC with justification for each (this document is separate from Exhibit E) ❑ ❑ ❑ Checklist continues on next page February 1, 2019 Page 9 of 11 Collier County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Revised Conceptual Master Site Plan 24" x 36"and One 8 %" x 11" copy Q 0 ❑ Original PUD document/ordinance, and Master Plan 24" x 36" —Only if the PUD E] E] E]Amending Revised PUD document with changes crossed thru & underlined 1 ❑ ❑ Copy of Official Interpretation and/or Zoning Verification 1 ❑ ❑ *If located in Immokalee or seeking affordable housing, include an additional set of each submittal requirement `The following exhibits are to be completed on a separate document and attached to the application packet: 9 Exhibit A: List of Permitted Uses X Exhibit 8: Development Standards X Exhibit C: Master Plan- See Chapter 3 E. 1. of the Administrative Code X Exhibit D: Legal Description R Exhibit E: List of Requested LDC Deviations and justification for each X Exhibit F: List of Development Commitments If located in RFMU (Rural Fringe Mixed Use) Receiving Land Areas Pursuant to LDC subsection 2.03.08.A.2.a.2.(b.)i.c., the applicant must contact the Florida Forest Service at 239- 690-3500 for information regarding "Wildfire Mitigation & Prevention Plan." PLANNERS — INDICATE IF THE PETITION NEEDS TO BE ROUTED TO THE FOLLOWING REVIEWERS: El School District (Residential Components): Amy Lockheart ❑ Conservancy of SWFL: Nichole Johnson ❑� Utilities Engineering: Eric Fey ❑ Parks and Recreation: Barry Williams (Director) ❑ Emergency Management: Dan Summers ❑ Immokalee Water/Sewer District: ❑ City of Naples: Robin Singer, Planning Director ❑ Other: ❑ City of Naples Utilities ❑ Other: ASSOCIATED FEES FOR APPLICATION ❑ Pre -Application Meeting: $500.00 5d PUD Rezone: $10,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre ❑ PUD to PUD Rezone: $8,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre ❑ PUD Amendment: $6,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre X Comprehensive Planning Consistency Review: $2,250.00 ❑ Environmental Data Requirements -EIS Packet (submittal determined at pre -application meeting): $2,500.00 xJ Listed or Protected Species Review (when an EIS is not required): $1,000.00 X Transportation Review Fees: o Methodology Review: $500.00 *Additional fees to be determined at Methodology Meeting. fv Minor Study Review: $750.00 o Major Study Review $1,500.00 February 1, 2019 Page 10 of 11 Co ler County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net X Legal Advertising Fees: o CCPC: $1,125.00 ox BCC: $500.00 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6958 F School Concurrency Fee, if applicable: o Mitigation Fees, if application, to be determined by the School District in coordination with the County Fire Code Plans Review Fees are not listed, but are collected at the time of application submission and those fees are set forth by the Authority having jurisdiction. The Land Development Code requires Neighborhood Notification mailers for Applications headed to hearing, and this fee is collected prior to hearing. All checks payable to: Board of County Commissioners. As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is included in this submittal package. I understand that failure to include all necessary submittal information may result in the delay of processing this petition. *Add iti a! a for the Sth a d subsequent re -submittal will be accessed at 20% of the original fee. Arim 3 d7 ?J Signature of itio orAge t Date Kre'" W. F'1-6^0 Printed named o signing party February 1, 2019 Page 11 of 11 Comer County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 Post Review Meeting Notes Petition Type: Date and Time: Assigned Planner: Engineering Manager (for PPL's and FP's): Nroject Information Project Name: PL #: Property ID #: Project Address: _ Applicant: Agent Name: Agent/Firm Address: Property Owner: _ Current Zoning: City: State Phone: City: 0-3 State: Zip: Please provide the following, if applicable: i. Total Acreage: ii. Proposed # of Residential Units: iii. Proposed Commercial Square Footage: iv. For Amendments, indicate the original petition number: V. If there is an Ordinance or Resolution associated with this project, please indicate the type and number: vi. If the project is within a Plat, provide the name and AR#/PL#: Updated 6/12/2019 Page 1 1 of 5 GOAT County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 Meeting Notes As of 10/16/2017 all Zoning applications have revised applications, and your associated Application is included in your notes; additionally, a *new Property Ownership Disclosure Form is required for all applications. A copy of this new form is included in your pre-app Note — link is https://www.colliergov.net/Home/ShowDocument?id=75093. Disclaimer: Information provided by staff to applicant during the Pre -Application Meeting is based on the best available data at the time of the meeting and may not fully inform the applicant of issues that could arise during the process. The Administrative Code and LDC dictates the regulations which all applications must satisfy. Any checklists provided of required data for an application may not fully outline what is needed. It is the applicant's responsibility to provide all required data. Updated 6/12/2019 Page 1 2 of 5 f Co ier County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 Meeting Notes Other required documentation for submittal (not listed on application): Disclaimer: Information provided by staff to applicant during the Pre -Application Meeting is based on the best available data at the time of the meeting and may not fully inform the applicant of issues that could arise during the process. The Administrative Code and LDC dictates the regulations which all applications must satisfy. Any checklists provided of required data for an application may not fully outline what is needed. It is the applicant's responsibility to provide all required data. Updated 6/12/2019 Page 1 3 of 5 Comer County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 Pre -Application Meeting Sign -In Sheet PL# Collier County Contact Information: Name Review Discipline Phone Email ❑ David Anthony Environmental Review 252-2497 david.anthony@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Claudine Auclair GMD Operations and Regulatory Management 252-5887 claudine.auclair@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Sally Ashkar Assistant County Attorney 252-8842 Sally.Ashkar@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Steve Baluch Transportation Planning 252-2361 stephen.baluch@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Ray Bellows Zoning, Planning Manager 252-2463 raymond.bellows@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Laurie Beard PUD Monitoring 252-5782 laurie.beard @colliercountyfLgov ❑ Craig Brown Environmental Specialist 252-2548 craig.brown@col liercountyfLgov ❑ Alexandra Casanova Operations Coordinator 252-2658 Alexandra.casanova@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Heidi Ashton Cicko Managing Asst. County Attorney 252-8773 heidi.ashton@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Thomas Clarke Operations Coordinator 252-2584 thomas.clarke@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Dale Fey North Collier Fire 597-9227 dfey@northcollierfire.com ❑ Eric Fey, P.E. Utility Planning 252-1037 eric.fey@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Tim Finn, AICP Zoning Division 252-4312 timothy.finn@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Sue Faulkner Comprehensive Planning 252-5715 sue.faulkner@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Paula Fleishman Impact Fee Administration 252-2924 paula.fleishman@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ James French Growth Management Deputy Department Head 252-5717 james.french@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Michael Gibbons Structural/Residential Plan Review 252-2426 michael.gibbons@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Storm Gewirtz, P.E. Engineering Stormwater 252-2434 storm.gewirtz@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Nancy Gundlach, AICP, PLA Zoning Division 252-2484 nancy.gundlach@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Shar Hingson Greater Naples Fire District 774-2800 shingson@gnfire.org ❑ John Houldsworth Engineering Subdivision 252-5757 john.houldsworth@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Jodi Hughes Transportation Pathways 252-5744 jodi.hughes@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Alicia Humphries Right -Of -Way Permitting 252-2326 aIicia.humph ries@colliercountyfLgov ❑ Marcia Kendall Comprehensive Planning 252-2387 marcia.kendall@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ John Kelly Zoning Senior Planner 252-5719 john.kelly@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Gil Martinez Principal Planner 252-4211 Gilbert.Martinez@Colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Thomas Mastroberto Greater Naples Fire 252-7348 thomas.mastroberto@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Jack McKenna, P.E. Engineering Services 252-2911 jack.mckenna@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Matt McLean, P.E. Development Review Director 252-8279 matthew.mclean@colliercountyfl.gov Updated 6/12/2019 Page 1 4 of 5 Comer County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 ❑ Michele Mosca, AICP Capital Project Planning 252-2466 michele.mosca@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Annis Moxam Addressing 252-5519 annis.moxam@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Stefanie Nawrocki Development Review - Zoning 252-2313 stefanie.nawrocki@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Richard Orth Stormwater Planning 252-5092 richard.orth@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Brandy Otero Transit 252-5859 bra ndy.otero@colliercountyfLgov ❑ Brandi Pollard Utility Impact fees 252-6237 brand i.pollard @colliercountyfLgov ❑ Todd Riggall North Collier Fire 597-9227 triggall@northcollierfire.com ❑ Daniel Roman, P.E. Engineering Utilities 252-2538 daniel.roman@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Brett Rosenblum, P.E. Development Review Principal Project Manager 252-2905 brett.rosenblum@coiliercountyfLgov ❑ James Sabo, AICP Zoning Principal Planner 252-2708 james.sabo@colliergo.net ❑ Michael Sawyer Transportation Planning 252-2926 michael.sawyer@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Corby Schmidt, AICP Comprehensive Planning 252-2944 corby.schmidt@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Chris Scott, AICP Development Review - Zoning 252-2460 chris.scott@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Linda Simmons North Collier Fire 252-2311 lnda.simmons@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Peter Shawinsky Architectural Review 252-8523 peter.shawinsky@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Camden Smith Zoning Division Operations 252-1042 camden.smith@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Mark Strain Hearing Examiner/CCPC 252-4446 mark.strain@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Mark Templeton Landscape Review 252-2475 mark.templeton@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Jessica Velasco Zoning Division Operations 252-2584 jessica.velasco@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Jon Walsh, P.E. Building Review 252-2962 jonathan.walsh@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ David Weeks, AICP Comprehensive Planning Future Land Use Consistency 252-2306 david.weeks@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Kirsten Wilkie Environmental Review 252-5518 kirsten.wilkie@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Christine Willoughby Development Review - Zoning 252-5748 christine.willoughby@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Daniel Zunzunegui North Collier Fire 252-2310 daniel.zunzunegui@colliercountyfl.gov Additional Attendee Contact Information: Name Representing Phone Email Updated 6/12/2019 Page 1 5 of 5 AFFIDAVIT OF AUTHORIZATION FOR PETITION NUMBERS(S) PL20190001600, PL20190001620 1, KURT G. SCHERER (OR) WM . S CHERER(print name), as TRUSTEE (title, if applicable) of WILLIAM C. SCHERER TRUST (company, If applicable), swear or affirm under oath, that I am the (choose one) ownerF— applicant=contract purchaser=and that: 1. 1 have full authority to secure the approval(s) requested and to impose covenants and restrictions on the referenced property as a result of any action approved by the County in accordance with this application and the Land Development Code; 2. All answers to the questions in this application and any sketches, data or other supplementary matter attached hereto and made a part of this application are honest and true; 3. 1 have authorized the staff of Collier County to enter upon the property during normal working hours for the purpose of investigating and evaluating the request made through this application; and that 4. The property will be transferred, conveyed, sold or subdivided subject to the conditions and restrictions imposed by the approved action. 5. Well authorize CIG NAPLES, LLC to act as our/my representative in any matters regarding this petition including 1 through 2 above. `Notes: • If the applicant is a corporation, then it is usually executed by the core. pres. or v. pres. • If the applicant is a Limited Liability Company (L.L.C.) or Limited Company (L.C.), then the documents should typically be signed by the Company's "Managing Member." • If the applicant is a partnership, then typically a partner can sign on behalf of the partnership. • If the applicant is a limited partnership, then the general partner must sign and be identified as the "general partner" of the named partnership. • If the applicant is a trust, then they must include the trustee's name and the words "as trustee" • In each instance, first determine the applicant's status, e.g., individual, corporate, trust, partnership, and then use the appropriate format for that ownership. Un r penalties the fa twftted' STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER , I declare that I have read the foregoing Affidavit of Authorization and that true. Date The foregoing instrument was acknowleged before me by means of physical presence or ®o line not rization this day of ;LV , 20Z, by (printed name of owner or qualifier),f'17 Such person(s) Notary Public must check applicable box: Are personally known to me ® Has produced a current drivers license E3 Has produced identification. Notary Signature: d , ;;�r'"�e,: dAV115111Ct comnb m 0 FF 9691T3 ExftaJuW5$7r• o� o?�. BpdedThu7tq, I O8D0.1Bbm CP\08-COA-00115\155 REV 3/4/2020 AFFIDAVIT OF AUTHORIZATION FOR PETITION NUMBERS(S) PUD PL20190001600& GMPA PL20190001620 1, David Bastos (print name), as Manager (title, if applicable) of GIG Naples, LLD. (company, if ap licable), swear or affirm under oath, that I am the (choose one) owner= applicant =contract purchaser✓ and that: 1. I have full authority to secure the approval(s) requested and to impose covenants and restrictions on the referenced property as a result of any action approved by the County in accordance with this application and the Land Development Code; 2. All answers to the questions in this application and any sketches, data or other supplementary matter attached hereto and made a part of this application are honest and true; 3. 1 have authorized the staff of Collier County to enter upon the property during normal working hours for the purpose of investigating and evaluating the request made through this application; and that 4. The property will be transferred, conveyed, sold or subdivided subject to the conditions and restrictions imposed by the approved action. 5. Well authorize Jeff E.wdght- Henderson BFranlin to act as ourlmy representative in any matters regarding this petition including 1 through 2 above. *Notes: • If the applicant is a corporation, then it is usually executed by the corp. pres. or v. pres. • If the applicant is a Limited Liability Company (L.L.C.) or Limited Company (L.C.), then the documents should typically be signed by the Company's "Managing Member." • If the applicant is a partnership, then typically a partner can sign on behalf of the partnership. • If the applicant is a limited partnership, then the general partner must sign and be identified as the general partner" of the named partnership. • If the applicant is a trust, then they must include the trustee's name and the words "as trustee"- • In each instance, first determine the applicant's status, e.g., individual, corporate, trust, partnership, and then use the appropriate format for that ownership. Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I have read the foregoing Affidavit of Authorization and that the facts stated in it are true. 1'-- y/13 /a�a Signature T ate STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER The foregoin instrument was acknowleged before me by means of ®physical presencegRr online notarization this t`� day of * \� , 2074 , by (printed name of owner or qualifier/ yl d "S a 3 Such person(s) Notary Public must check applicable box: ® Are personally known to me ❑ Has produced a current drivers license ❑ Has produced ///�� Notary Signature: as identification. .G-- TERESA ANN WALDEN Notary Pudic, State of Ohio My Commission Expires ID-15.2022 CP\08-COA-00115\155 REV 3/4/2020 AFFIDAVIT OF AUTHORIZATION FOR PETITION NUMBERS(S) PUDPL20190001600&GMPAPL20190001620 1, David Bastos (print name), as Manager (title, if applicable) of cIG Naples, LLc. (company, If a plicable), swear or affirm under oath, that I am the (choose one) owner= applicant=contract purchaser✓ and that: 1. I have full authority to secure the approval(s) requested and to impose covenants and restrictions on the referenced property as a result of any action approved by the County in accordance with this application and the Land Development Code; 2. All answers to the questions in this application and any sketches, data or other supplementary matter attached hereto and made a part of this application are honest and true; 3. 1 have authorized the staff of Collier County to enter upon the property during normal working hours for the purpose of investigating and evaluating the request made through this application; and that 4. The property will be transferred, conveyed, sold or subdivided subject to the conditions and restrictions imposed by the approved action. 5. We/I authorize Patackyanasse,AIGP to act as our/my representative in any matters regarding this petition including 1 through 2 above. *Notes: • If the applicant is a corporation, then it is usually executed by the corp. pres. or v. pres. • If the applicant is a Limited Liability Company (L.L.C.) or Limited Company (L.C.), then the documents should typically be signed by the Company's "Managing Member." • If the applicant is a partnership, then typically a partner can sign on behalf of the partnership. • If the applicant is a limited partnership, then the general partner must sign and be identified as the general partner" of the named partnership. • If the applicant is a trust, then they must include the trustee's name and the words "as trustee". • In each instance, first determine the applicant's status, e.g., individual, corporate, trust, partnership, and then use the appropriate format for that ownership. Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I have read the foregoing Affidavit of Authorization and that the facts stated In It are true. Signature 7I Date STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER ryryTThe foregoing instrument was acknowleged before me by means of I@ physical presen or ®online notarization this , day of ��r (1 201-j , by (printed name of owner or qualifier) \� Ni Atzsb s Such person(s) Notary Public must check applicable box: ® Are personally known to me ® Has produced a current drivers license ® Has produced as identification. Notary Signature< , a%. %�# WCLJ -- TERESA ANN WALDEN Notary Public, State of Ohio My Commission Expires 10-15.2022 cP\08-coA-00115a55 REV 3/4@020 COitieV County PL20190001600 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252.6358 COVENANT OF UNIFIED CONTROL The undersigned do hereby swear or affirm that we are the fee simple titleholders and owners of record of property commonly known as ajjo # 00198000006 Sec 30. Tovvnshp 48-Range 26 W 1/2 of E 1/2 of NW 114 of NW4/4, Less N 100 Ft. Collier County, Florida (street address and City, State and Zip Code) and legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto. The P-Uprroperty described herein is the subject of an application forgb,Arnrai nnartmentsplanned unit development (_ L PUD) zoning. We hereby designate_ Thomas D. Barber, legal representative thereof, as the legal representatives of the property and as such, these individuals are authorized to legally bind all owners of the property in the course of seeking the necessary approvals to develop. This authority Includes, but Is not limited to, the hiring and authorization of agents to assist In the preparation of applications, plans, surveys, and studies necessary to obtain zoning approval on the site. These representatives will remain the only entity to authorize development activity on the property until such time as a new or amended covenant of unified control is delivered to Collier County. The undersigned recognize the following and will be guided accordingly in the pursuit of development of the project: 1. The property will be developed and used in conformity with the approved master plan including all conditions placed on the development and all commitments agreed to by the applicant in connection with the planned unit development rezoning. 2. The legal representative identified herein is responsible for compliance with all terms, conditions, safeguards, and stipulations made at the time of approval of the master plan, even if the property is subsequently sold in whole or in part, unless and until a new or amended covenant of unified control is delivered to and recorded by Collier County. 3. A departure from the provisions of the approved plans or a failure to comply with any requirements, conditions, or safeguards provided for in the planned unit development process will constitute a violation of the Land Development Code. 4. All terms and conditions of the planned unit development approval will be incorporated into covenants and restrictions which run with the land so as to provide notice to subsequent owners that all development activity within the planned unit development must be consistent with those terms and conditions. S. So long as this covenant is in force, Collier County can, upon the discovery of noncompliance with the terms, safeguards, and conditions of the planned unit development, seek equitable relief as necessary to compel compliance. The County will not issue permits, certificates, or licenses to occupy or use any part of the planned unit development d the County may stop ongoing construction activity until the project is brought Into compliance with III terrri�, cpr ions and safeguards of the planned unit development. Oe'r U I�efad Owner Printed Name printed Name �,FA•FE F�-ft• RFl,9i,A) d)1 tcJct r l AS tot(b af}#irmed) Ad subscribed before me this �t day of by who is personally known to me or has produced -I be 5 C 1Ce IL LC as Identification. d.Xt rG -�hr\ UCN _t i Notary Public (Name typed, printed or ed AANNGf Notary Public Slsie of Michlr)nn County of wnyne )My Commission Expires Apr 11. ;01R Acting in the County of l[ �"¢" t.�b L February 1. 2019 Page 8 of 11 Co filer county COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliereov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-5358 PROPERTY OWNERSHIP DISCLOSURE FORM This is a required form with all land use petitions, except for Appeals and Zoning Verification Letters. Should any changes of ownership or changes in contracts for purchase occur subsequent to the date of application, but prior to the date of the final public hearing, it is the responsibility of the applicant, or agent on his behalf, to submit a supplemental disclosure of interest form. Please complete the following, use additional sheets if necessary. a. If the property is owned fee simple by an INDIVIDUAL, tenancy by the entirety, tenancy in common, or joint tenancy, list all parties with an ownership interest as well as the percentage of such interest: 31 C. r = Name and Address % of Ownership GVrc L e'. 7f'rI T G � _ t fi ►� � L `�ie w � � � D �A:9 If the property is owned by a CORPORATION, list the officers and stockholders and the percentage of stock owned by each: Name and Address % of Ownership cl�Arowl 71 LAI mi- 03 If the property is in the name of a TRUSTEE, list the beneficiaries of the trust with the percentage of interest: Name and Address % of Ownership William %. Scherer c/o Excel Real Estate 2375 N. Tamiami Trail #206 Naples, FL 34103 }'ill►. Li elpj T� i RV465 Created 9/28/2017 r-/]C,: i- ]'CNN 5hw-'E< Page I of 3 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net Si er County 28M NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34204 1239) 252-2400 FAX: (233) 252-5358 d. If the property is in the name of a GENERAL or LIMITED PARTNERSHIP list the name of the general and/or limited partners: Name and Address % of Ownership NIA e. If there is a _CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE. with an individual or individuals, a Corporation, Trustee, or a Partnership, list the names of the contract purchasers below, including the officers, stockholders. beneficiaries. or partners: f [,A Name and Address % of Ownership {- 31. G 7 Date of Contract: If any contingency clause or contract terms involve additional parties, list all individuals or lu , UI LIUSL.- Name and Address NIA Date subject property acquired elf ❑ Leased: Term of lease years /months If, Petitioner has option to buy, indicate the following: Created 9/28/2017 Page 2 of 3 Ca er Co1.nty COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliereov.net (2391252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Date of option: Date option terminates: 0V or Anticipated closing date: AFFIRM PROPERTY OWNERSHIP INFORMATION Any petition required to have Property Ownership Disclosure, will not be accepted without this form. Requirements for petition types are located on the associated application form. Any change In ownership whether individually or with a Trustee, Company or other Interest -holding party, must be disclosed to Collier County Immediately if such change occurs prior to the petition's final public hearing. As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is included in this submittal package. I understand thatfailureto include all necessary submittal information may result in the delay of processing this petition. The completed application, all required submittal materials, and fees shall be submitted to: Growth Management Department ATTN; Business Center 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Agent/Owner Gregg Fusaro, Capital Investment Group, Inc. Agent/Owner Name (please print) Die Created 9/28/2017 page 3 of 3 Colfler county COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION www.colliergov.net ADDRESSING CHECKLIST 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 252-5724 Please complete the following and email to GMD_Addressing@colliergov.net or fax to the Operations Department at 239-252-5724 or submit in person to the Addressing Department at the above address. Form must be signed by Addressing personnel prior to pre -application meeting, please allow 3 days for processing. Not all items will apply to every project. Items in bold type are required. FOLIO NUMBERS MUST BE PROVIDED. Forms older than 6 months will require additional review and approval by the Addressing Department. PETITION TYPE (Indicate type below, complete a separate Addressing Checklist for each Petition type) ❑ BL (Blasting Permit) ❑ SDP (Site Development Plan) ❑ BD (Boat Dock Extension) ❑ SDPA (SDP Amendment) ❑ Carnival/Circus Permit ❑ SDPI (Insubstantial Change to SDP) ❑ CU (Conditional Use) ❑ SIP (Site Improvement Plan) ❑ EXP (Excavation Permit) ❑ SIPI (Insubstantial Change to SIP) ❑ FP (Final Plat ❑ SNR (Street Name Change) ❑ LLA (Lot Line Adjustment) ❑ SNC (Street Name Change — Unplatted) ❑ PNC (Project Name Change) ❑ TDR (Transfer of Development Rights) ❑ PPL (Plans & Plat Review) ❑ VA (Variance) ❑ PSP (Preliminary Subdivision Plat) ❑ VRP (Vegetation Removal Permit) ❑m PUD Rezone ❑ VRSFP (Vegetation Removal & Site Fill Permit) ❑ RZ (Standard Rezone) ❑ OTHER LEGAL DESCRIPTION of subject property or properties (copy of lengthy description may be attached) 30 48 26 W 1/2 OF E 1/2 NW 1/4 OF NW 1/4, LESS N 100 FT R/W FOLIO (Property ID) NUMBER(s) of above (attach to, or associate with, legal description if more than one) 00198000006 STREET ADDRESS or ADDRESSES (as applicable, if already assigned) N/A • LOCATION MAP must be attached showing exact location of project/site in relation to nearest public road right- of-way • SURVEY (copy - needed only for unplatted properties) PROPOSED PROJECT NAME (if applicable) CIG MIXED USE ( Coral Blue Apartments) (Not approved at this time.) PROPOSED STREET NAMES (if applicable) SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN NUMBER (for existing projects/sites only) SDP - or AR or PL # PL-20190001620 Coflie-r County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 252-5724 Project or development names proposed for, or already appearing in, condominium documents (if application; indicate whether proposed or existing) Please Return Approved Checklist By: ❑• Email Applicant Name: Tom Barber Phone: (239)597-3111 ❑ Fax ❑ Personally picked up Email/Fax: tom.barber@abbinc.com Signature on Addressing Checklist does not constitute Project and/or Street Name approval and is subject to further review by the Operations Department. FOR STAFF USE ONLY Folio Number 00198000006 Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Approved by: r'� -�� Date: 02/19/2020 Updated by: Date: IF OLDER THAN 6 MONTHS, FORM MUST BE UPDATED OR NEW FORM SUBMITTED FJ IMratluchan �' qpM I "� ri Search for Parcels by - �! YMialillili l 0 Search Results 8seaW&N,,, ��ne nmus '- Mp , iell FJi-ayer= ni-eaena o Prim l a' 1V. b l.. E'LAerial Year'. 2019 alesYear. OFF - 0.481< LEGEND TCONIENUME �MENT 011TA lEFina TEA "D"I N 1/4 CORNER OF : - Na�anY oawu NW CORNER OF SECTION 30, T. 48 S. R. 26 E. ♦ - _ N T N 11� SECTON 30, T. 48 5, R. 26 E. S 89"58'36" E (BEARING BASIS) 2640.19' (CALC) PER DNR REPORT DOC./081805 " NDT To swc PER DNR REPORT DOC./081805 NORTH LINE OF SECTION 30, T.48 S., R. 26 E. RN,wr" r� - IIIEIIY UK ET o NIRID a sT.T EIaI RreA10 S 89'58'36" E 660.05' IMMOKALEE ROAD C.R.846 ®- CAGE TV ONPNONN INNER N1 �ucTER I g SUBJECT A_ nN InDRANT I 8 IMMOKALEE ROAD 100' R/W &025 o 660 PROPER H Db- NATER WILtE S� a txNT Pau! I I z N $ T S 89'58'36" E 330.01' MEDIAN SOUTH R LINE PER DEED I x m . aLVAlION EO NOT FgVETUAI NRa/f�ataalK eo• rA7acNR xax-oxaNns EAmQa Fat _ MC p PaIEN�L NM -a 1E iOR G ND NMImINl2 FIGLIFH RaXAm N MO a o rAmlr TN Ro.o auNwc uTUTr o `niwaE Nnnr,uo Ah - AEt caaaoND I wNm xcr Reoaom x ae eaae ,n r ae , Nor¢ awe>m OF x ox $t 0ANw�'r I ca°0°xiEN1°°''mulPlr n°OwR1°Io'� �+n4�,�nNucntcaaaE,LxNE'D____ m emo PP — — =SEE NOTE #2 — qm NPEn I (oRo) _ cNautm I c Am l9/3984 eADN of eEANIos • m Fam PERPETUAL xox-ExaueETc EAmIENT FN ROAo RAE DRAxAaE AID a: ; oTNo I ¢ r M"111 o— ON _ CaxU[it NDNu" om:CO m I Im I VICINITY MAP N.T.S. C1V _ CAGE ,acxsax j GUS . mINTr tNu,. I'JUE]IFNT I If1 DETAIL 12] 122 1 OONC x ORANNMi[�Nea[NT z CURB I DI _ Dal NDE pl - DRAINAGE y 8. 3 ZONE DR _ DIUEE MY zEa F4w.taxr Q I ASPHALT PARKINGI Z E(F) - EAmEM .Z I O FEE FIEID NEAwnm Q - FINISHEDRIOR ELEVANw CONC. I .s N N GUY NOWSIDEWALK N 12.1 O I ui (ty: iE O % 1za NII'M �- DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY AS FURNISHED TO THE SURVEY 00 MEAN N wrm I N, - NaNI ANEPoCwI I IPP LvnICAL DATw OF TNN NONYA-LERTI1101— GEODETIC SEC. 30, L TOWNSHIP "T Tar I W 1/2 OFE 1/2OFNfTl W 1/4 OF NW 1/4, LESS N 100 FEET. e wr• I&M ON MOIL TN I COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA.ON _ I P : P,,TTr CFDmRVA1aE iza 122 00 PIP . Pa1NAmn CONTROL PONT PL9 - PRaFina1R LNID m1LE1CR 00 I (VACANT) I POO - POINT OF ECONOMIC MIC I :1`1 DO ®M: POINT PONN F 00 tl4 Pw . PEIN"CR RFIaIFEIfL I NO NNFNT PE. PONT OF TANONIr I4a - PAVEMENT P.IIL . PI1aG utuTr [Amer R REC . AECDN _ RADUE DtK RANDIE R= I - Rw W YMY y IQO IL3 I SEC. SEeax I SW.F. - SDEYNLK EAmEENr T 5- DON mNN _ TOITTINION' IP Is, . TENPmARY mNwYA1N I Z ry - TEusT®w TE . 1Ff111INO0Y U1NY EATOQlT Q. - wiRAraNnN�R I 9 E" I I I "A BERMUDA PALMS, A \10 I CONDOMINIUM O.R.BOOK 3575, ZONE I PAGE 1325 (OCCUPIED) HUBERT SCHERER TRUST O.R. BOOK 4466, PAGE 1075 ZONE "AE" (VACANT) I �I tL7 11.4 I I ZONE "AH" I 7 a.s �n I O z /e- w SURVEYORS' NOTES: STAMPED 1) No Tirle Commitment or Abstract of Title was furnished to the Surveyor. ZONE "AH" ZONE "AE" —10 5 va I 10 0 10 2) There are 4 concrete power poles and guy wires along the North line of the I subject property. No recorded easement has been furnished to the surveyor, Surveyor was unable to locate a recorded document for these poles. 3) Street Address is 5000 Immokolee Road, Naples, FL ZONE "AH" SCALE: 1" = TOO' I I 4) Bearings are based on thr North line of the NW 1/4 of Section 30, T.48 S.. R. 27 E. BEING S 89'58'36" E (ASSUMED) w� I 5) Property is in Flood Zone "X", "AE" & "AH" per F.I.R.M. Panel 120067. v I + 12021"C" 0194"H", dated 05/16/2012 a the Flood Zone lines shown on survey were copied from the FEMA DFirm map x and ore approximate. ozi I I 6) ALL ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON THIS PLAT ARE BASED ON NAVD88 DATUM. I ZONE "X"-500 FENCEEA'Cer I PREPARED FOR: CHAIN LINK FENCE CAPITAL INVESTMENT DEVELOPMENT TO CAPITAL INVESTMENT DEVELOPMENT GROUP, INC.; I o I GROUP, INC. THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THIS MAP OR PLAT AND THE SURVEY ON WHICH IT IS BASED WERE MADE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE 2016 MINIMIUM STANDARD DETAIL REQUIREMENTSFOR ALTA/NSPS LAND TITLE SURVEYS, JOINTLY ESTABLISHED AND ADOPTED — — — FND 5/e' CHAIN LINK N FDtCE Is FND 5/e" BY ALTA AND NSPS, AND INCLUDE ITEMS 1, 2, 3, 11 & 13 OF TABLE "A" THEREOF. THE ROD & CAP o'g SOUTH ROD &CAP FIELD WORK WAS COMPLETED ON AUGUST 2, 2019. ILLEGIBLE N 89"58'13" IN 329.86' ILLEGIBLE DATE OF PLAT: AUGUST 13, 2019 FENCE POST FENCE NEST WILLIAM A, NOVAN N & o.e' souTN LIVINGSTON LAKES, A O.R.BPATRICIA DO603, GE 184OS CONDOMINIUM O.R. BOOK 3286, O.R. BOOK 5T) PAGE 1848 PAGE 3286 REVISIONS ALTA SPS LAND TIME SURVEY (VACANT) FB 1245 48 P&A3066.DWG L—SEC DENNIS M. PORTELLA SR. PLS #4504� (OCCUPIED) OROSRBD BY. GREG FUSARO NOT VALID UNLESS SIGNED AND SEALED WITH A EMBOSSED RAISED SEAL OF THE PORTEIJ.A & ASSOCIATES, IJ.0 LBO 7904 FLORIDA LICENSED SURVEYOR AND MAPPER. f—. LINWOOD AVE. NAPLES, FL 34112 SCALE: 1 100' (239) 775-6511 INSTR 5486031 OR 5460 PG 132 RECORDED 12/20/2017 11:20 AM PAGES 2 DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT, COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA REC $18.50 Prepared by: Daniel J. Cramer Cramer, Minock & Sweeney, P.L.C. 339 E Liberty, Ste 200 Ann Arbor, Michigan 48104 QUIT CLAIM DEED Property Appraiser's Parcel Identification No. 00198000006 This Quit Claim Deed executed this 171h day of June, 2015, by first party, Grantor William C. Scherer, a single man and as the surviving spouse of Irene K. Scherel-l-whose address is 19218 Eastwood Drive, Harper Woods, Michigan 482125 -,.tQ second parry, Grantee William C. Scherer, as Trustee, William C. Scherer Trust u/a/d °"" 19 ended and restated on June 17, 2015, whose address is WITNESSETH: that tkie skid first fort sum 1 lest than $10, pty the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, does hereby rerrrie, ,lease ad quit lai unto the said second party forever, all the right, title, m resi � �yvh � �e d" if t'part has in and to the following described parcel of land, ands imp o ement , and in n iI'thereto in Collier County, Florida, to -wit: j W/1/2 of E 1/2 of NWi14`f,NW1/4, Less N 1 t Collier County, Florida ° I S To have and to hold the sam tag h w t_*a d singular the appurtenances thereunto belonging or in anywise appertaining, and afilIiate; right, title, interest, lien, equity and claim whatsoever for the said first party, either in law or equity, to the only proper use, benefit and behoof of the said second party forever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the first party has signed and sealed these presents the day and year first above written, sealed and delivered in the presence of: WITNESSES: ��. C/P b a r Janie 'J..Cramer r Janette Seile Carras William- C. Scherer *** OR 5460 PG 133 *** STATE OF MICHIGAN ) )SS COUNTY OF WASHTENAW ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me and produced photo identification, on this 17" day of June, 2015 by William C. Scherer, a single man and as the surviving spouse of Irene K. Scherer. K, p•.��ya4 � °�¢.7keaJ ' :�,a R•Jane e eile Carra ,Notary Public, Was t naw County, State of Michigan My Commission Expires: June 16, 2017 return to: aniThel J. Cramer Cramer, Minock & Sweeney, P; 339 East Liberty Street, Suite Ann Arbor, Michigan 48104 = t * Whose death certificate has �i2✓ County Records. . IS ndSOse, corded at Liber S,w Tax Bills to: 109e , Coif ier County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 'ROPFRTY 01niniERCNia DISCLOc-1 iRF FnRnn This is a required form with all land use petitions, except for Appeals and Zoning Verification Letters. Should any changes of ownership or changes in contracts for purchase occur subsequent to the date of application, but prior to the date of the final public hearing, it is the responsibility of the applicant, or agent on his behalf, to submit a supplemental disclosure of interest form. Please complete the following, use additional sheets if necessary. a. If the property is owned fee simple by an INDIVIDUAL, tenancy by the entirety, tenancy in common, or joint tenancy, list all parties with an ownership interest as well as the percentage of such interest: C Name and Address % of Ownership Re: William C. Scherer Trust 25 Janice M. Marshall, Trustee 16089 Bak Road Belleville, MI 48111 If the property is owned by a CORPORATION, list the officers and stockholders and the percentage of stock owned by each: Name and Address % of Ownership Kurt G. Scherer, Trustee 25 18590 Nunneley Clinton Township, MI 48035 If the property is in the name of a TRUSTEE, list the beneficiaries of the trust with the percentage of interest: Name and Address % of Ownership William G. Scherer c/o Excel Real Estate 25 2375 N. Tamiami Trail #206 Naples, FL 34103 (FBO: William G. Scherer, Trustee) W.C. Scherer Trust/Special Needs Trust 25 FBO: Lynn Scherer c/o:Janice M. Marshall 16089 Bak Road Belleville, MI 48111 Created 9/28/2017 Page 1 of 3 Coif ier County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 d. If the property is in the name of a GENERAL or LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, list the name of the general and/or limited partners: Name and Address % of Ownership N/A e. If there is a CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE, with an individual or individuals, a Corporation, Trustee, or a Partnership, list the names of the contract purchasers below, including the officers, stockholders, beneficiaries, or partners: Name and Address % of Ownership Capital Investment Development Group, LLC 100 Gregg A. Fusaro 5 David Bastos 31.67 Alexander Bastos 31.67 Kathleen Bergen 31.66 Date of Contract: 6/18/19 f. If any contingency clause or contract terms involve additional parties, list all individuals or officers, if a corporation, partnership, or trust: [- Name and Address N/A Date subject property acquired NSA ❑ Leased: Term of lease years /months If, Petitioner has option to buy, indicate the following: Created 9/28/2017 Page 2 of 3 Ca er Co1.nty COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliereov.net (2391252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Date of option: Date option terminates: 0V or Anticipated closing date: AFFIRM PROPERTY OWNERSHIP INFORMATION Any petition required to have Property Ownership Disclosure, will not be accepted without this form. Requirements for petition types are located on the associated application form. Any change In ownership whether individually or with a Trustee, Company or other Interest -holding party, must be disclosed to Collier County Immediately if such change occurs prior to the petition's final public hearing. As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is included in this submittal package. I understand thatfailureto include all necessary submittal information may result in the delay of processing this petition. The completed application, all required submittal materials, and fees shall be submitted to: Growth Management Department ATTN; Business Center 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Agent/Owner Gregg Fusaro, Capital Investment Group, Inc. Agent/Owner Name (please print) Die Created 9/28/2017 page 3 of 3 preareaus On bid Not On Lint Reason to Lot — No p MemoRi.me Detail by Entity Name Howard Limited eemry Compooy r no mrorma on FERIN Number NONE Daft Filed amMQ= swe FL � FORT OR infoliff Malline MCma � EAST OR STRIET tniatamd Agent Name & outdoors FORTo v I AWhereonlcl0efa ff Moore & opposite; OWN NOR � EAST OR imi CINGINNOTILOHpOi MReports NeAnnual Reports Filed vmzo-nape umime ua w Feel On jo Next On Let Return W Lot CIO Naples ILLC No ENdpz No Moore HIMM r $'om m 'z a m<IAn ��O r A.vy v i �Nv �'p m a _ D>> N OD cm l'I 0 :2 m D;D�� r o�Nv w p 0'o .p g mCS nm0 r xz'm01 rmr m < oa oNO,G ' mb v D O p IZ/IN Z.IyI 0ONm ti DO Z�SZC D VI fZ/1A�N � Z A.Ap 3=_=� C) NQ w OZn VIAND V ONDAy<<y N o0 Ow06 �e wO� c 3: r�Sz S cA V, A CCCDN AImmA 1+1�\>�~ A OWN W. O O5 OO" G -NO mm z ?00 6� O O �{� ''** '�T} T}[� ''T}T��m�I-� AfN�lZW N 0f7Nmym O ?�p mi 3 q6q D 11Y�Q 1`L�W.J�lYl[ul - - _ - - U�z a>o 0 0� lr�1 z mx z 3 znF Dow 0 m cmv�vm Ut m�D c� w cpi3s Ail mm0 cr- NMMG/ m R o Nf mSA D p vy' 0Mz- mmm o v=> p n CwN n F I o Oo CCF C A !nSA wz m�OZ D O. m Z C M A z v to z 0 W rlzlcZ m off" O�Dr�IC1 D o A w••w O (n I �W00 0 > o' OHO ry (D Ficmz D O wp- I > 00 =CO M . dw GJ Do = ; =I `�� > nn OI 3 Inn � �z �_ v �i mn m N l J n M l A 0 N p >' a o m 1N3Y135V3 mo �I v K a 01 N co o D ^ O t0 �o y C m nOi z> I 0i A>g ; M> o0i i z� I Iliam> m O x > D rnzzo Z v I ao N N ' z< W ggg D z -1 Z O I 8 N ma m y 00 2� N = I __ O8'ti8ll M „£ti,S0.Z0 N I I I 11, r� C mo l NlMatld 1 HdSV q N �j In o o I ONINtlVd IWKc SV �I N �Dm 'Em I O p r, c N ' 50.00 100.00' In s R 114 to D 00 Z z RI O N N z 5 � s Ou D MO Z F �' I y� u (D j� m F `^ z gg rn ,� I s M5E N z Im�l 5 c>>z 0 O m D O a YAg Z � oll m O mof n'I O M q� u v �?Z N N `�' Ez X A o I p Z O m N I q: I A Ax m m ?W I s O �N W Z s QD NOu' y u,N z Z a:V I m 00 CA Z I z r o N p m O 8 Im rn D M = m 0 t9 C 8 O �2fc Z ,va-e0� £8'ti8ll 3 „81,50.Z0 S a C_ aNn ua3aoad 1sVa ��; I p FI00 +8 •`$ I p 00 v I in o I� m A m z '^ I M C, I I m I Z 0. I qg m v mW I ,W I 4 I N I I I 9mz ZOA A zn A z 2 O (P 00 o&$ I gvl D �W W �m O 01 W i s LA. (DEED NORiFi O O 0 0 60 120 Feet O N m a' � m LLr \ Ew 0 Z Z m o �o� o v W � �s 3 r Mai 82' W � n q MARRIOTT 195' 195' s .� o 415' 100' 60' 70' O 55'45' 70' ` 3o o 30' VERIZON25'oCHASE WALMART 14STORAGE ; N 30' 0�111 \—CARWASH VACANT BLTJECORAL71-75 JULIET BLVD LAND BERMUDA PALMS Lu z V) Q m a w = ~ 2 w z W oc� Q in ~ = a a O Q J W LuLu % J W m J z J p[ Q Q z O O L% co co3 af THIS SITE PLAN IS CONCEPTUAL IN NATURE AND INTENDED FOR PLANNING PURPOSES ONLY. THE P OVERALL CONFIGURATION, DENSITY AND OR INTENSITY MAR,2021 �IGNERWA DEPICTED MAY CHANGE SIGNIFICANTLY BASED UPON SURVEY, ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL, AND/OR a �� DLP REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS. a 200079.00.00 n uuMaE OF March 23, 2021 2:57 PM K.•\2020\200079.00.00 Coral Blue Apartments - CPA & PUD\02 CPA Support\Working Docs\Exhibits\Building Heights Exhibit.dwg 0 30 60 120 Lu 44 f , { r - � '� z A. ,. Al �t r j t , BERMUDA PALMS` ' p - - w 3 4 - ice.` 1 QD OLn N t M l0 00 _ 15' TY 00 J 'B' BUFFER �' L 213' _� o — Ln ' --- 199'— ZZ o - - -- z rn C z +o ' - O .. N W O X cc � '190.4 - � - LN a� Q O - .5" I " x cn Ln O Q 113.2' W � `� 112.8' i O .o , ujW on Ln Lie 200. ILI oil 630' 25' PRINCIPAL SETBACK - % 20' _ CARLTON -- __--- _ LAKES —LIVINGSTON— LAKES JIM Lu V 15, TYPE �r Q 'B' BUFFER } °Cco uj j ,yam - V) Lu qh ..fib 1 ti FUTURE GERMAIN LEXUS DEALERSHIP ras AM � 4f, AOL-%, v "jIL V z w W O J J [[ V d H THIS SITE PLAN IS CONCEPTUAL IN NATURE AND INTENDED FOR PI ANNING PURPOSES ONLY. THE OVERALL CONFIGURATION, DENSITY AND OR DATE: DESIGNED: INTENSITY DEPICI ED MAY CHANGE SIGNIF TLY MAR.,2021 RWA BASED UPON SUFVEY, ENGINEERING, SEC: TWP: RGE: DRAWN: ENVIRONMENTAL, AND/OR REG ORY DLP REQUIREMENTS. PROJECT No.: 200079.00.00 SHEET NUMBER: March 23, 2021 2.38 PM K.'\2020\200079.00.00 Coral Blue Apartments - CPA & PUD\02 CPA SupportMorking Docs\Exhibits\Setbacks Exhibitdwg 1 OF 0 30 60 Feet 0 BERMUDA PALMS 113.03'± BLUE CORAL APARTMENTS m m LL� , 17 aN E w ZZrn�o 15' �o�Y W v Q s z 77,+ LBE 25' LANDSCAPE ^ a 4 W o TREES a� V .A Ln PM- +1 rn ON - - - 14-9-1 Uj Ir w z a N z z O 60' 42' a z w U LU DRIVE DRIVELn Ln /PRKG /PRKG ° Q U w J or W W Q Q CO J Q U- D m Q U W C Uj THIS SITE PLAN IS CONCEPTUAL IN NATURE AND INTENDED FOR PLANNING PURPOSES ONLY. THE _ o OVERALL CONFIGURATION, DENSITY AND OR INTENSITY °AMAR.,zOn °`""EewA DEPICTED MAY CHANGE SIGNIFICANTLY BASED UPON SURVEY, ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL, AND/OR s. .wP a - DIP REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS. "200079.00.00 Ell—ERI of 1 March 23, 2021 3:05 PM K:\2020\200079.00.00 Coral Blue Apartments - CPA & PUD\02 CPA Support\Working Docs\ Exhibits\ West Buffer Cross Section.dwg A LIVINGSTON LAKES 93'± +I 0 53' DRIVE/ PARKING EX. BUFFER 180'± PRESERVE AREA 1.18 AC. EX. TREES TL 0 30 60 Feet BLUE CORAL APARTMENTS 25' PRESERVE BUFFER t � a a 73 9�F'- �- o i li Sol :i 11 s: w z N O Q z u a w w z F- vi w c vi a a O Q u J W of W ty LL W m LL J J � m Q Q Q O D W O THIS SITE PLAN IS CONCEPTUAL IN NATURE AND INTENDED FOR PLANNING PURPOSES ONLY. THE _ OVERALL CONFIGURATION, DENSITY AND OR INTENSITY DEPICTED MAY CHANGE SIGNIFICANTLY BASED UPON-T.AR.,M11 °`""MI SURVEY, ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL, AND/OR S. .wP a REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS. 11.11CT"° — oRP 14arch 23, 2021 2:32 PM K.•\2020\200079.00.00 Coral Blue Apartments - CPA & PUD\02 CPA Support\Working Docs\Exhibits\South Buffer Cross Section.dwg BLUE CORAL APARTMENTS 50'± EOP 150'± ARE LANDSCAPED R 1681MOKALEE ROW a 100' CANAL EASEMENT 1 60' BUFFER • -------------------_----------- —------------__—--------- y Cl)in �1 Ww .# A AW •1� 1 :��■ A.., N o o _ N 15'TYPE "D' \—EX. MEDIAN BUFFER TREES CARLTON 97'± LAKES M EX. TREES af z z V) O Q z a z v w w z w °C O a a � O Q v J w CC W w % J L w m l J m Q Q = z O O L% O LU af THIS SITE PLAN IS CONCEPTUAL IN NATURE AND INTENDED FOR PLANNING PURPOSES ONLY. THE o OVERALL CONFIGURATION, DENSITY AND OR INTENSITY DEPICTED MAY CHANGE SIGNIFICANTLY BASED UPON MAR 2021 �IGNERWA SURVEY, ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL, AND/OR a REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS. March 23, 2021 4:52 PM K.•\2020\200079.00.00 Coral Blue Apartments - CPA & PUD\02 CPA Support\Working Docs\Exhibits\North Buffer Cross Section.dwg • J i - _.,,. �; 4 s - fie. ' ,r Wak 7` PF Oakes Farm: °Nn a a — — — — — — — — _ •1- as 1 < ,Q., Seed to Table Carlton Lakes 7 ft Jim 0 50 100 04 OIL Alt I T 4- ��' - - - - --_ _. __ .. `!�+? .. i'_ .. —r.r .�+� . •tea � .. ,+.�`t-�tST. -fit* r,r - � r. ,. _ -' �?�" ..- . - - �!�>.�. '-i: ' ' _ •.•.:. .. _. �` s — -- WALAL � mmoae•o - � •� Wit► 11 . , _ �; '!` ------\ •\ - *- � � �• w �. is w \ __ \ � ,,.. • �A1n, . ' '`' -'' trcF \ \ . r `\ r �h r \� \f' =�: ` �� ot. "�,- .s_ f,t �' �w \•' � � � t .4 .l' "�`11• , _•C`,\•� � , - t ,L \ �y pt•'1 \ \ �� - r Windsong, Club Bermuda Palms 1r - � _: i_ + � ►-s �rr� s A f A artments�� L p KY r ' ' �. U Chase �M x Inmate y �.,; - _ -.: `� - � _Bank � .�� a .x- Express ,,• Verizon N� r ^� - Car Wash �" Wireless - :4:. ►..- g, AAMJL AC MGM L ~�.�;� •s r r rr rr rr y �s. \ r _ Or 06 IL r Extra c- r _ _ fit.^ � - i r S ,.. r.r acerL Storage ,' t ,}� ' � � � , r r r r r r r - - T� �•. r t IL � � :f - ,tea '• � � '► f f "� : � `f a� .�• �� as _ r ti eL NONE ■EMMM,GNOLI NMMMM,■■■■■' ARBER & ■■■■■■B EMEMEWBRUNDAGE, INC. Professional Engineers, Planners, Surveyors & Landscape Architects .4 Walmart S percenter s \:.Ilk t tie, Awli f r IL Aill IL s. Is- e Pr a ti �r '' s� - ter.' / k `�� i < ♦ ^41 ®n*' ► r r r .�yy�i� . �`� r s • r •, r yo f r rl Ail WKIV, �� , -_ if r• �j, - - +, •- yr �•, J�d , i, •-Y � •1. 1 ;.y, a . r � � ,► � •4I - + \ a .' -�• a r''t ¢ t:,. •tit `. `` A� � . ` . �lt°' � e +�'`.t: � .` .?I f ' /}i j► »'1 Y_ `�, r �ii'� y y, lid .' �* i _ � ""W f 4 33' _ J r ' v ivH '•r, . � th - Ti,' _ _� � , fi _ - �}r, ice( t. S �, e:S�*g� 4�l^�+�' � - - _ �� r ,� •� 1, u � \ r �;* L --•,,,-_ .�. - •� r �• _ . , . _ _. ,.. .... - -.. at.,, .ate' ..,f� .e t. - _ c a �s i F k .� owl t .t s�s R li- ' �L fir• !. + .{' a; •LaR�l7�� _ . N LivingstonL A - y t ' •:�. - � .rsa �� •1' I ti h' - i. ti •A r' ti ♦ t F_ � � �.,r ... -..� � a+'YI' 1, i' � �� 5' T's 1 -•'^ I � •T L T y_ '71A-- Tw.R �. i. t � =+�i �` i Y S' •�t s:'N .` Ir a4 • • 0 •.. Blue Coral Apartments Aerial Overlay Exhibit V.A.2 Source: CCPA 2019 Created: 1 /24/2020 ABB PN: 20-0003 Al-aw"r on • w � I m L -IMMOKALEE RD- '"—k A -WONDER WORLD DR- � � T LEGEND: SFWMD WETLANDS (0.67 Ac.t) FLUCFCS % OF CODES DESCRIPTIONS ACREAGE TOTAL 4119 E2 PINE FLATWOODS, DISTURBED (25-49% EXOTICS) 2.63Ac.± 28.1% 4119 E3 PINE FLATWOODS, DISTURBED (50-75% EXOTICS) 1.75 Ac.± 18.7% 4119 E4 PINE FLATWOODS, DISTURBED (76-100%EXOTICS) 1.32Ac.± 14.1% 4159 E3 PINE, DISTURBED (50-75%EXOTICS) 1.51 Ac.± 16.1% 422 BRAZILIAN PEPPER 0.41 Ac.± 4.4% 437 AUSTRALIAN PINE 0.70Ac.± 7.5% 6309 E3 MIXED WETLAND FOREST, DISTURBED (50-75% EXOTICS) 0.52 Ac.± 5.6% 6309 E4 MIXED WETLAND FOREST, DISTURBED (76-100% EXOTICS) 0.15 Ac.± 1.6% 814 ROAD 0.36 Ac.± 3.9% TOTAL 9.35 Ac.± 100.0% NOTES AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHS WERE ACQUIRED THROUGH THE COLLIER COUNTY PROPERTY APPRAISER'S OFFICE WITH A FLIGHT DATE OF DECEMBER 2018. PROPERTY BOUNDARY PER PORTELLA & ASSOCIATES, LLC DRAWING No. P&A3066 ACADFILE.DWG DATED MARCH 2, 2020. FLUCFCS LINES ESTIMATED FROM 1'=200' AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHS AND LOCATIONS APPROXIMATED. FLUCFCS PER FLORIDA LAND USE, COVER AND FORMS CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM (FLUCFCS) (FOOT 1999). UPLAND/WETLAND LIMITS HAVE NOT BEEN REVIEWED BY ANY REGULATORY AGENCY AND ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE. R.F./T.S. 3/2/20 EXHIBIT 3. AERIAL WITH FLUCFCS AND WETLANDS MAP REVIEWED BY DATE PAS SARE LLA IMMOKALEE ROAD INTERCHANGE RESIDENTIAL INFILL B.B. 3DATE °o�°'tiag � ASSOCIATES SUBDISTRICT/BLUE CORAL APARTMENTS REV SED DATE v_ dgl IMMOKALEE ROAD INTERCHANGE RESIDENTIAL INFIL SUBDISTRICT/ a.ka. BLUE CORAL APARTMENTS COLLIER COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL DATA REPORT Revised May 2020 Prepared For: Capital Investment Group, Inc. 226 East 81h Street Cincinnati, Ohio 45202 (513) 659-6181 Prepared By: Passarella & Associates, Inc. 13620 Metropolis Avenue, Suite 200 Fort Myers, Florida 33912 (239) 274-0067 Project No. 20CIG3219 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Introduction.................................................................................................................................... I Environmental Data Authors.........................................................................................................1 VegetationDescriptions.................................................................................................................I ListedSpecies Survey....................................................................................................................3 NativeVegetation Preservation.....................................................................................................4 Conservation and Coastal Management Element Consistency......................................................5 References......................................................................................................................................5 it LIST OF FIGURES Page Exhibit 1. Project Location Map.........................................................................................El-1 Exhibit 2. Aerial with Boundary......................................................................................... E2-1 Exhibit 3. Aerial with FLUCFCS and Wetlands Map........................................................E3-1 Exhibit 4. Native Vegetation Map......................................................................................E4-1 Exhibit 5. Listed Species Survey........................................................................................ E5-1 iii LIST OF TABLES Page Table 1. Native and Non -Native Habitat Types and Acreages............................................4 1V INTRODUCTION The following environmental data report is provided in support of the Planned Unit Development (PUD) amendment for Blue Coral Apartments (Project). The Environmental Data Report was prepared in accordance with the Collier County Environmental Data Report submittal requirements outlined in Chapter 3.08.00 of the Collier County Land Development Code (LDC). The 9.35± acre Project site is located in Section 30, Township 48 South, Range 26 East, Collier County (Exhibit 1). More specifically, the Project is found along the south side of Immokalee Road approximately 2,700 feet west of Interstate 75 (Exhibit 2). The Project is bound by Immokalee Road to the north, Bermuda Palms to the west, Livingston Lakes to the south, and undeveloped land to the east. The Project site is comprised mainly of undeveloped, forested uplands and wetlands that have been invaded to various degrees by exotic vegetation including melaleuca (Melaleuca quinquenervia), Brazilian pepper (Schinus terebinthifolius), earleaf acacia (Acacia auriculiformis), and Australian pine (Casuarina equisetifolia). The following Environmental Data Report includes details regarding the authors of this report, vegetation descriptions for the various habitats on -site, results of the listed species survey conducted by Passarella & Associates, Inc. (PAI) in January 2020, and the County native vegetation preservation requirement. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA AUTHORS This Environmental Data Report was prepared by Bethany Brosious and Heather Samborski. They both satisfy the environmental credential and experience requirements for preparing the Environmental Data Report, per Section 3.08.00 of the Collier County LDC. Ms. Brosious is an Ecologist with PAI, with over 13 years of consulting experience in the environmental industry. She holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Animal Sciences from the University of Florida and a Master of Science degree in Environmental Science from Florida Gulf Coast University. Ms. Samborski is an Ecologist with PAI, with five years of consulting experience in the environmental industry. She holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Biology from Eastern Connecticut State University and a Master of Science degree in Environmental Science from Florida Gulf Coast University. VEGETATION DESCRIPTIONS The existing vegetative communities on the property include forested uplands and wetlands with varying degrees of exotic infestation. The vegetation associations for the property were delineated using December 2018 rectified color aerials (Scale: 1" = 200') and groundtruthing conducted in January 2020. These delineations were classified based on the nomenclature of the Florida Land Use, Cover and Forms Classification System (FLUCFCS) Levels III and IV 1 (Florida Department of Transportation 1999). Level IV FLUCFCS was utilized to denote disturbance, and "E" codes were used to identify levels of exotic species invasion (e.g., melaleuca, earleaf acacia, and Brazilian pepper). AutoCAD Map 3D 2018 software was used to determine the acreage of each mapped polygon, produce summaries, and generate the final FLUCFCS map (Exhibit 3). A total of nine vegetative associations and land uses (i.e., FLUCFCS codes) were identified on the Project site. The dominant habitat type on the Project site is Pine Flatwoods, Disturbed (FLUCFCS Code 4119 E2), accounting for 28.1 percent of the property (2.63± acres). Exotic vegetation documented on -site includes but is not limited to, Brazilian pepper, melaleuca, earleaf acacia, and Australian pine. The degree of exotic infestation ranges from 25 to nearly 100 percent cover. The Project site contains 0.67± acre of South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) jurisdictional wetlands (Exhibits 3 and 4). The jurisdictional wetlands identified by FLUCFCS code include approximately 0.52 acre of Mixed Wetland Forest, Disturbed (FLUCFCS Code 6309 E3) and approximately 0.15 acre of Mixed Wetland Forest, Disturbed (FLUCFCS Code 6309 E4). The on -site wetlands contain a large amount of exotic vegetation including Brazilian pepper, earleaf acacia, and melaleuca. The following is a description of each FLUCFCS classification. Pine Flatwoods, Disturbed (25-49% Exotics) FLUCFCS Code 4119 E2) The canopy of this upland habitat is primarily slash pine (Pinus elliottii) with scattered live oak (Quercus virginiana) and earleaf acacia. The sub -canopy is dominated by saw palmetto (Serenoa repens) with myrsine (Myrsine cubana), rusty staggerbush (Lyonia ferruginea), and gallberry (Ilex glabra) throughout. Earleaf acacia and Brazilian pepper are also found scattered throughout the sub -canopy. The ground cover is dominated by saw palmetto and includes scattered bracken fern (Pteridium aquilinum). Greenbrier (Smilax spp.), muscadine grapevine (Vitis rotundifolia), and poison ivy (Toxicodendron radicans) are found throughout the ground cover and sub - canopy. Pine Flatwoods, Disturbed (50-75% Exotics) FLUCFCS Code 4119 E3) This habitat type is similar to Pine Flatwoods, Disturbed (25-49% Exotics) (FLUCFCS Code 4119 E2) with higher densities of melaleuca, Brazilian pepper, and earleaf acacia. Pine Flatwoods, Disturbed (76-100% Exotics) FLUCFCS Code 4119 E4) This habitat type is similar to Pine Flatwoods, Disturbed (50-75% Exotics) (FLUCFCS Code 4119 E3) with higher densities of melaleuca, Brazilian pepper, and earleaf acacia. Pine, Disturbed (50-75% Exotics) (FLUCFCS Code 4159 E3) The canopy of the upland habitat is comprised of widely scattered slash pine with earleaf acacia, melaleuca, cabbage palm (Sabal palmetto), live oak, and bald cypress (Taxodium distichum). The sub -canopy is composed of melaleuca, earleaf acacia, Brazilian pepper, cocoplum (Chrysobalanus icaco), live oak, laurel oak (Quercus laurifolia), and widely scattered bald 2 cypress. The ground cover is mostly open but includes live oak, wedelia (Sphagneticola trilobata), muscadine grapevine, greenbrier, Brazilian pepper, melaleuca, earleaf acacia, and widely scattered swamp fern (Telmatoblechnum serrulatum) and sawgrass (Cladium jamaicense). Brazilian Pepper (FLUCFCS Code 422) This upland habitat type is dominated by Brazilian pepper in all strata with scattered earleaf acacia and slash pine in the canopy, with earleaf acacia and melaleuca in the sub -canopy. The ground cover is mostly bare, with some muscadine grapevine. Australian Pine (FLUCFCS Code 437) This habitat type has a canopy that is comprised entirely of Australian pine. The sub -canopy is dominated by Australian pine with scattered cabbage palm, Brazilian pepper, and myrsine. The ground cover is mostly bare, with scattered Brazilian pepper and wild coffee (Psychotria nervosa). Mixed Wetland Forest, Disturbed (50-75% Exotics) FLUCFCS Code 6309 E3) The canopy of this wetland habitat consists primarily of melaleuca and earleaf acacia with scattered slash pine, bald cypress, and cabbage palm. The sub -canopy includes melaleuca, earleaf acacia, Brazilian pepper, cabbage palm, laurel oak, and bald cypress. The ground cover is dominated by swamp fern and sawgrass, with scattered cabbage palm, fennel (Eupatorium leptophyllum), Brazilian pepper, melaleuca, and earleaf acacia. Mixed Wetland Forest, Disturbed (76-100% Exotics) (FLUCFCS Code 6309 E4) This wetland habitat type is similar to Mixed Wetland Forest, Disturbed (50-75% Exotics) (FLUCFCS Code 6309 E3) with higher densities of melaleuca, Brazilian pepper, and earleaf acacia in all strata. Road FLUCFCS Code 814) This land use type consists of roadways and their Right -of -Ways. LISTED SPECIES SURVEY A listed plant and wildlife species survey was conducted by PAI on the Project site on January 28, 2020. Three listed plant species, stiff -leaved wild pine (Tillandsia fasciculata), inflated wild pine (Tillandsia balbisiana), and butterfly orchid (Encyclia tampensis) were observed during the listed species survey. The stiff -leaved wild pine and inflated wild -pine are listed as threatened and endangered by the Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services (FDACS) respectively, and the butterfly orchid is listed as commercially exploited. All three species are included on the Collier County "Less Rare Plant List." None of the species documented on -site are federally listed. The survey methodology and results are provided as Exhibit 5. 3 NATIVE VEGETATION PRESERVATION The 9.35± acre Project site is comprised of 7.88± acres of native vegetation. An 0.70± acre area of Australian pine, 0.40± acre of Brazilian pepper, and 0.36± acre of roadway have been identified as non-native vegetation (Ordinance 14-34) and have been excluded from the native vegetation calculation (Exhibit 4). Section 3.05.07.B.1 of the Collier County LDC requires the retention and preservation of 15 percent of the on -site native vegetation for a mixed -use development in the non -coastal high hazard area which for this Project equates to a 1.18± acre preserve requirement (i.e., 7.89± acres of native vegetation x 0.15 = 1.18± acres of required native vegetation preserve) (Exhibit 4). Table 1 provides a summary of the native vegetation communities on -site and the native vegetation preservation calculation. Table 1. Native and Non -Native Habitat Types and Acreages FLUC Codee Description Native Vegetation Acreage Non -Native Vegetation Acreage 4119 E2 Pine Flatwood, Disturbed 25-49% Exotics 2.63 - 4119 E3 Pine Flatwood, Disturbed 50-75% Exotics 1.75 - 4119 E4 Pine Flatwood, Disturbed 76-100% Exotics 1.32 - 4159 E3 Pine, Disturbed 50-75% Exotics 1.51 - 422 Brazilian Pepper - 0.40 437 Australian Pine - 0.70 6309 E3 Mixed Wetland Forest, Disturbed 50-75% Exotics 0.52 - 6309 E4 Mixed Wetland Forest, Disturbed 76-100% Exotics 0.15 - 814 Road - 0.36 Total 7.88 1.46 Minimum Retained Native Vegetation Requirement (Native Vegetation Acreage, 7.89E Acres x 15 Percent) 1.18 The applicant proposes to preserve and enhance 1.18± acres of native vegetation along the south side of the Project site. Please see the Master Concept Plan for the location of the on -site preserve areas. The preserves' proposed locations allow for habitat connectivity to the undeveloped land and the preserve areas to the east and to the preserve area for Livingston Lakes to the southeast. Enhancement activities within the preserve areas will include the removal of exotic vegetation and supplemental plantings of native vegetation, where required. The locations of the on -site preserve areas were selected to be consistent with Section 3.05.07.A.4 and 3.05.07.A.5 of the Collier County LDC and to provide a connection to adjoining off -site preservation areas. The property does contain 0.67± acre of isolated low -quality wetland habitats that are utilized by listed plant species; however, the same listed plant species were also identified in the proposed preserve area. Retention of this wetland habitat would result in a small, low quality preserve area, likely surrounded by development. Further, the property contained no .19 xeric scrub, dune, strand, hardwood hammocks, wetlands with a Wetland Rapid Assessment Procedure score of at least 0.65, or upland habitat that serves as a buffer to high quality wetlands. As a result, the locations of the native vegetation preserves were selected to provide connectivity to the off -site conservation/preserve lands to the east and southeast, per Section 3.05.07.A.5. As previously noted, these areas will also be enhanced through exotic vegetation removal and supplemental planting of native vegetation. This activity will improve the quality of habitats on - site and off -site through the elimination of exotic and nuisance species seed sources. CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT CONSISTENCY The project as proposed is consistent with the Policies in Objective 6.1 and 7.1 of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME), for the following reasons: • The Project will preserve and enhance a minimum of 15 percent of the native vegetation on -site. The preserve will be protected in perpetuity with a conservation easement, prohibiting further development. • Selection of preservation area is consistent with the criteria listed in Policy 6.1.1 and the preserve provides connectivity to off -site preserve areas. • A habitat management and exotic vegetation removal and maintenance plan will be required at the time of Site Development/Construction Plan submittal. The preserve area shall be required to be maintained free of Category I and II invasive exotic plants, as defined by the EPPC. • The requirement for submittal of appropriate environmental data pursuant to Policy 6.1.8 has been satisfied. • Jurisdictional wetlands have been identified as required in Policies 6.2.1 and 6.2.2. Agency permits will be required at the time of Site Development/Construction Plan submittal. • In accordance with CCME Policy 7.1.4, project development will comply with applicable federal and state permitting requirements regarding listed species protection. REFERENCES Florida Department of Transportation. 1999. Florida Land Use, Cover and Forms Classification System. Procedure No. 550-010-001-a. Second Edition. 5 EXHIBIT 1 PROJECT LOCATION MAP r.• �� ,�,a;.,}��-�- . � � -,� '. � 1'* .. , �. ice' r 9 V!NP •?'' `' r_,.. I . c.. ;P.pyD AP,P, LE R N„;.�, .pp +WIGGINS PASS'RD. .yy,'r.-wq."r� �.,.. +lyti}1.-'v•s}4 k .A 4i -�,�)RD 0x4,: `$firio ,Z71 A oZ ENTRADA.AE ko 0MPERIAGOLFa ' '}}e Vx , p '" -'•' \-,w },Oai EkA _ CORE: .. - :.€s... •�w k. fi'+. -Yy'k.. a 4'� m df._ . r ?.-i I. OAYE ,G S-RESF,R - iiti ,'�Si. LLU _l i m Q wyrt _ nl. 3Y=i�..'WG,$j•�j} 'WTI:. Q _l� J m s L)R, 4E_R'h Z T y'O ''}Ln h.{iA� O^ 'rya . 4f. - it <, ;F'' K �p,,� ' 'M1 - i,�- . �:?' ..,4 N .r t �v-'•.,7� •• rnlcnnl.n' r. �2' Y ', �'1} : _ ' o. yvik,N w FF.Ll ..: pp ICj F� L AI.; - =' J. � RIPER.BLVD...... ,�. y �' EXIT OT'RIMMOKxjLE RD ,,, ' RE,� r O' a > AUTUMN' % Kb LN - - , nl S:'7n' r z'f/ 111 !. s r§p $IDEBLVD'+°o-:N `.#l1,w.. 'o,-'}� .. r>_' i CREEK.. �' } ' PKsi"�.,I., i ;.•�Y''i.. 7"x'l"Gi"� r, _ _: ?I" I b0.`* yy taw.-. ; Y i• J �' m sx HIDD.ENOAKS LN z ,',t. .`. l ,O'$+;Z'- Z. ., _ M •R�� _'6.'. TRL-a 40�A'QKS75VIS3 .i'WQ 99TH AVE �N �o'xy', :.. ~4.p :m. .R y .. ,..,r`t: . W.4"•" . Y: r :. �. ."..?' 98TH AVEN 'iy'NUIN' { r• $:. +Q"GOLDEN?OAKSLN, SATU. 2S 97TH AVEN _',yls + K 1p '. _ `�I -'`R' 96TH AVE Nr.:+ 347H AVEN yr I 'PELICAN M RSWUTI STANDING OAKS LN3.3RDj�AVE��32ND}AVE,lIV91 ST AVE NST�aZ' �;'o."r0lin § .— 'SHABURO wr.� #..... ,Q ' i ' Ac _i°.?`�- BUR OAKS -LN , ._.�s:�'+5ti-,S;,.L� . IL 3Y_ENGLISH OAKS�LN-m y. BAYS :. ?=Y # dl ; :'»v.�f? t{S O �" 2yrr .`L �-,►" R S. ISLAND�� p .g .O• a VANDE IUPBEA0H3RD 1`` J D P �r,.�*. ��1r 0i'QO ..j ',;, I ,7'� ra '*`� > ' `..-_: 2 m +0�4' 'yy",,, EME_'�� i :y.' `sRD_p.aF•Si'y )J.'`'i, •m' S'x -.1_�":CHERRYIWOOD DR-+4-'7fH "AV ENW-- m �z{ m `"DRHICKORY-WOOD DR . - STFi AVE NW - fc : ..� J'► Off:-'Ir w (9:ys. rM/S.S\�k _ :F.`C !Vo,.y_,,: �43.&.v,be �.",O L. i:7 .�__ .F I ?.' u ''. ~'�¢] r� L I >_? y 'CORAL -.WOOD DR 3RDAVE NW. ✓.r 9 ORANGE.BLCISSOM_" "DANIELSRD - _tllr ll,*tl Alrl,&'Ll .. • EXHIBIT 2 I_\ of R I_\ I��i• ' : �11�117,11' • ♦} m � Q ma�yy,, N R P r1 tii y I' Alpj aeer� 4 'i EXHIBIT 2. AERIAL WITH BOUNDARY BLUE CORAL APARTMENTS � IMMOKALEE RD- tllllF w w '1 an I 1 , _MIL M �1"K 1 �1 - -WONDER WORLD DR- 4 NOTES: i t �5 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHS WERE ACQUIRED THROUGH THE COLLIER COUNTY PROPERTY APPRAISER'S OFFICE WITH A FLIGHT DATE OF DECEMBER 2018. PROPERTY BOUNDARY PER PORTELLA & ASSOCIATES, LLC DRAWING No. P&A3066 - ACADFILE.DWG DATED MARCH 2, 2020. DRAWN BY DATE R.F./T.S. . REVIEWED BY DATE DATE PAS B.B. REVISED DATE 3DATE SARE LLA �IrI� & ASSOCIATES 04 - Ecolog�srs _ EXHIBIT 3 AERIAL WITH FLUCFCS AND WETLANDS MAP Al-aw"r on • w � I m L -IMMOKALEE RD- '"—k A —WONDER WORLD DR— � � T LEGEND: SFWMD WETLANDS (0.67 Ac.±) FLUCFCS % OF CODES DESCRIPTIONS ACREAGE TOTAL 4119 E2 PINE FLATWOODS, DISTURBED (25-49% EXOTICS) 2.63Ac.± 28.1% 4119 E3 PINE FLATWOODS, DISTURBED (50-75% EXOTICS) 1.75 Ac.± 18.7% 4119 E4 PINE FLATWOODS, DISTURBED (76-100%EXOTICS) 1.32Ac.± 14.1% 4159 E3 PINE, DISTURBED (50-75%EXOTICS) 1.51 Ac.± 16.1% 422 BRAZILIAN PEPPER 0.41 Ac.± 4.4% 437 AUSTRALIAN PINE 0.70Ac.± 7.5% 6309 E3 MIXED WETLAND FOREST, DISTURBED (50-75% EXOTICS) 0.52 Ac.± 5.6% 6309 E4 MIXED WETLAND FOREST, DISTURBED (76-100% EXOTICS) 0.15 Ac.± 1.6% 814 ROAD 0.36 Ac.± 3.9% TOTAL 9.35 Ac.± 100.0% NOTES AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHS WERE ACQUIRED THROUGH THE COLLIER COUNTY PROPERTY APPRAISER'S OFFICE WITH A FLIGHT DATE OF DECEMBER 2018. PROPERTY BOUNDARY PER PORTELLA & ASSOCIATES, LLC DRAWING No. P&A3066 ACADFILE.DWG DATED MARCH 2, 2020. FLUCFCS LINES ESTIMATED FROM 1"=200' AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHS AND LOCATIONS APPROXIMATED. FLUCFCS PER FLORIDA LAND USE, COVER AND FORMS CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM (FLUCFCS) (FOOT 1999). UPLAND/WETLAND LIMITS HAVE NOT BEEN REVIEWED BY ANY REGULATORY AGENCY AND ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE. R.F./T.S. 3/2/20 EXHIBIT 3. AERIAL WITH FLUCFCS AND WETLANDS MAP REVIEWED BY DATE PAS SARE LLA BLUE CORAL APARTMENTS B.B. 3DATE °colog m & ASSOCIATES REVISED DATE Emlogie[s U EXHIBIT 4 NATIVE VEGETATION MAP � \\-IMMOKALEE RD- K;/`�V 614 (0.36 Ac.±) SCALE: 7" = 200' 422 r (0,41 Ac.±) m 4119E3 a I I (0.26 Ac.±) a I I 4119E2 (2.63 Ac.±) 437 (0.70 Ac.±) LEGEND: 4119E4 SFWMD WETLANDS 0.19 Ac.±) El (0.67 Ac.±) NATIVE VEGETATION (7.88 Ac.±) NON-NATIVE VEGETATION -WONDER WORLD DR- (1.47 Ac.±) NOTES: PROPERTY BOUNDARY PER PORTELLA IN FLUCFCS % OF ASSOCIATES, LLC DRAWING No. P&A3066 CODES DESCRIPTIONS ACREAGE TOTAL ACADFILE.DWG DATED MARCH 2, 2020. 4119 E2 PINE FLATWOODS, DISTURBED (25-49% EXOTICS) 2.63Ac.± 28.1% 4119 E3 PINE FLATWOODS, DISTURBED (50-75% EXOTICS) 1.75Ac.± 18.7% FLUCFCS LINES ESTIMATED FROM 1'=200- 4119 E4 PINE FLATWOODS, DISTURBED (76-100% E)(OTICS) 1.32Ac.± 14.1% AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHS AND LOCATIONS 4159 E3 PINE, DISTURBED (50-75% E)(OTICS) 1.51 Ac.± 16.1% APPROXIMATED. 422 BRAZILIAN PEPPER 0.41 Ac.± 4.4% FLUCFCS PER FLORIDA LAND USE, COVER 437 AUSTRALIAN PINE 0.70Ac.± 7.5% AND FORMS CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM 6309 E3 MIXED WETLAND FOREST, DISTURBED (50-75% EXOTICS) 0.52Ac.± 5.6% (FLUCFCS) (FOOT 1999). 6309 E4 MIXED WETLAND FOREST, DISTURBED (76-100% EXOTICS) 0.15 Ac.± 1.6% 814 ROAD 0.36Ac.± 3.9% UPLAND/WETLAND LIMITS HAVE NOT TOTAL 9.35Ac.± 100.0% BEEN REVIEWED BY ANY REGULATORY AGENCY AND ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE. R.F./T.S. 3 EXHIBIT 4. NATIVE VEGETATION MAP REVIEWED BY DATE WPASSARELLA B.B.3DATE ASSOCIATES a BLUE CORAL APARTMENTS R.B. /2/ �_ 1 �� EXHIBIT 5 LISTED SPECIES SURVEY BLUE CORAL APARTMENTS LISTED SPECIES SURVEY Revised May 2020 1.0 INTRODUCTION This report documents the results of the listed species survey conducted by Passarella & Associates, Inc. on January 28, 2020 for Blue Coral Apartments (Project). The Project is comprised of 9.35± acres of forested lands, invaded by varying degrees of exotic vegetation located in Section 30, Township 48 South, Range 26 East, Collier County (Figure 1). The Project is located along the south side of Immokalee Road approximately 2,700 feet west of Interstate- 75. More specifically the Project is bordered by Immokalee Road to the north, Bermuda Palms to the west, Livingston Lakes to the south, and undeveloped land to the east. 2.0 LITERATURE REVIEW AND FIELD SURVEY METHODOLOGY A literature review and field survey were conducted to determine whether the Project site was being utilized by state and/or federally listed species as identified by the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWCC) and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) as endangered, threatened, or species of special concern. In addition, the property was surveyed for plant species listed by the Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services and the USFWS as endangered, threatened, or commercially exploited and surveyed for plant species that are included on the Collier County Rare and Less Rare Plants lists (Land Development Code (LDC) Section 3.04.03). 2.1 Literature Review The literature review involved an examination of available information on listed species in the Project's geographical region. The literature sources reviewed included: Florida's Endangered and Threatened Species (FWCC 2018); Florida Atlas of Breeding Sites for Herons and Their Allies (Runde et al. 1991); National Bald Eagle Management Guidelines (USFWS 2007); the Florida Panther Habitat Preservation Plan (Logan et al. 1993); Landscape -Scale Conservation for the Florida Panther (Kautz et al. 2006); and USFWS and FWCC databases for telemetry locations of the Florida panther (Puma concolor coryi), bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus), red -cockaded woodpecker (Picoides borealis), Florida black bear (Ursus americanus floridanus), Florida scrub jay (Aphelocoma coerulescens), and wading bird rookeries (e.g., wood stork (Mycteria americana)) in Collier County. The FWCC and USFWS database information is updated on a periodic basis and is current through different dates, depending on the species. The FWCC information that was reviewed is current through the noted dates for the following four species: Florida E5-1 panther telemetry — June 2019; bald eagle nest locations — 2017; black bear telemetry — December 2007; and red -cockaded woodpecker locations 2006. 2.2 Field Survey The field survey was conducted during daylight hours by qualified ecologists walking parallel belt transects across the Project site. Transects were spaced to ensure that sufficient visual coverage of ground and flora was obtained. Approximate transect locations and spacing are shown on Figure 2. At regular intervals the ecologists stopped, remained quiet, and listened for wildlife vocalizations. The survey was conducted with the aid of 8x or 1 Ox power binoculars. 3.0 RESULTS 3.1 Literature Review No red -cockaded woodpecker colonies or cavity trees have been documented on the Project site. The closest documented colonies are approximately 1,700 feet south and 3,000 feet southeast of the Project site (Figure 3). The red -cockaded woodpecker is a state and federally listed endangered species. One bald eagle nest location is documented by FWCC approximately 3,200 feet to the north of the Project site (Figure 3). The Project site is located well outside of the USFWS designated 660-foot buffer zone for bald eagle nests. The bald eagle is not a listed species but is protected under the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act and the Migratory Bird Treaty Act. According to the FWCC data, the Project falls within the core foraging area (CFA) of one recorded wood stork colony (Figure 4). Colony No. 619081 is located approximately 10.75± miles northeast of the Project site. The wetlands on the Project site provide limited foraging potential for wood storks due to their dense canopy and exotic species coverage. The wood stork is a state and federally listed threatened species. The Project site is located within the USFWS Florida bonneted bat (Eumops floridanus) consultation area (Figure 5). The Florida bonneted bat is a state and federally listed endangered species. There are five plant species listed on the "Less Rare Plant" list per Collier County's LDC Section 3.04.03 (Requirements for Protected Plants) that could occur within habitats on the Project site. They include Florida butterfly orchid (Encyclia tampensis), giant wild pine (Tillandsia utriculata), inflated wild pine (T. balbisiana), stiff -leaved wild pine (T. fasciculata), and twisted air plant (T. flexuosa). Five plant species are listed on the "Rare Plant" list per Collier County's LDC Section 3.04.03 (Requirements for Protected Plants). They include Cowhorn orchid (Cyrtopodium punctatum), Curtiss's milkweed E5-2 (Asclepias curtissii), Florida clamshell orchid (Encyclia cochleata), Ghost orchid (Polyrrhiza lindenii), and West Coast prickly apple (Harrisia gracilis). 3.2 Field Survey The field survey was conducted on January 28, 2020. Weather conditions during the survey were partly cloudy skies, with five to ten miles per hour northeasterly winds, and temperatures in the low 70s. The field survey documented three listed plant species on the Project site: stiff -leaved wild pine, inflated wild pine, and Florida butterfly orchid. These epiphytic plant species were found throughout the Project site located on live and dead oaks (Quercus sp.), pines (Pinus sp.), and melaleuca (Melaleuca quinquenervia) (Figure 5). 4.0 SUMMARY The literature search and review of agency databases found documented occurrences for no listed species on the Project site. The Project site is not located within the vicinity of an active bald eagle nest and is located within one documented wood stork colony CFA. The Project site is located within the USFWS consultation area for the Florida bonneted bat. The January 28, 2020 field survey documented three listed plant species on the Project site: stiff - leaved wild pine, inflated wild pine, and Florida butterfly orchid. No listed wildlife species were observed. 5.0 REFERENCES Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission. 2018. Florida's Endangered and Threatened Species. Official Lists, Bureau of Non -Game Wildlife, Division of Wildlife. Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission. Tallahassee, Florida. Kautz, R., R. Kawula, T. Hoctor, J. Comiskey, D. Jansen, D. Jennings, J. Kasbohm, F. Mazzotti, R. McBride, L. Richardson, K. Root. 2006. How much is enough? Landscape -scale conservation for the Florida panther. Biological Conservation, Volume 130, Issue 1, Pages 118-133 Logan, Todd, Andrew C. Eller, Jr., Ross Morrell, Donna Ruffner, and Jim Sewell. 1993. Florida Panther Habitat Preservation Plan South Florida Population. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; Gainesville, Florida. E5-3 Runde, D.E., J.A. Gore, J.A. Hovis, M.S. Robson, and P.D. Southall. 1991. Florida Atlas of Breeding Sites for Herons and Their Allies, Update 1986 - 1989. Nongame Wildlife Program Technical Report No. 10. Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission, Tallahassee, Florida. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2007. National Bald Eagle Management Guidelines. E5-4 r.• �� ,�,a;.,}��-�- . � � -,� '. � 1'* .. , �. ice' r 9 V!NP •?'' `' r_,.. I . c.. ;P.pyD AP,P, LE R N„;.�, .pp +WIGGINS PASS'RD. .yy,'r.-wq."r� �.,.. +lyti}1.-'v•s}4 k .A 4i -�,�)RD 0x4,: `$firio ,Z71 A oZ ENTRADA.AE ko 0MPERIAGOLFa ' '}}e Vx , p '" -'•' \-,w },Oai EkA _ CORE: .. - :.€s... •�w k. fi'+. -Yy'k.. a 4'� m df._ . r ?.-i I. OAYE ,G S-RESF,R - iiti ,'�Si. LLU _l i m Q wyrt _ nl. 3Y=i�..'WG,$j•�j} 'WTI:. Q _l� J m s L)R, 4E_R'h Z T y'O ''}Ln h.{iA� O^ 'rya . 4f. - it <, ;F'' K �p,,� ' 'M1 - i,�- . �:?' ..,4 N .r t �v-'•.�7� •• rnlcnnl.n' r. �2' Y ', �'1} : _ ' o. yvik,N w FF.Ll ..: pp ICj F� L AI.; - =' J. � RIPER.BLVD...... ,�. y �' EXIT OT'RIMMOK LE RD ,,, ' RE,� r O' a > AUTUMN' % Kb LN - - , nl S:'7n' r z'f/ 111 !. s r§p $IDEBLVD'+°o-:N `.#l1�w.. 'o,-'}� .. r>_' i CREEK.. �' } ' PKsi"�.,I., i ;.•�Y''i.. 7"x'l"Gi"� r, _ _: ?I" I b0.`* yy taw.-. ; Y i• J �' m sx HIDD.ENOAKS LN z ,',t. .`. l ,O'$+;Z'- Z. ., _ M •R�� _'6.'. TRL-a 40�A'QKS75VIS3 .i'WQ 99TH AVE �N �o'xy', :.. ~4.p :m. .R y .. ,..,r`t: . W.4"•" . Y: r :. �. ."..?' 98TH AVEN 'iy'NUIN' { r• $:. +Q"GOLDEN?OAKSLN, SATU. 2S 97TH AVEN _',yls + K 1p '. _ `�I -'`R' 96TH AVE Nr.:+ 347H AVEN yr I 'PELICAN M RSWUTI STANDING OAKS LN3.3RDj�AVE��32ND}AVE,lIV91 ST AVE NST�aZ' �;'o."r0lin § .— 'SHABURO wr.� #..... ,Q ' i ' Ac _i°.?`�- BUR OAKS -LN ._.�s:�'+5ti-,S;,.L� . IL 3Y_ENGLISH OAKS�LN-m y. BAY :. ?=Y # d l ; :'»v . �f? t{S O �" 2yrr .`L �-,►" R S. ISLAND�� p .g .O• a VANDE IUPBEA0H3RD 1`` J D P �r,.�*. ��1r 0i'QO ..j ',;, I ,7'rt ra � > ' `..-_: 2 m +0�4' 'yy",,, EME_'�� i :y.' `sRD_p.aF•Siry )�.'3`'in•m' S'x -.1_�":CHERRYIWOOD DR-+4-'7fH "AV ENW-- m �z{ m `"DRHICKORY-WOOD DR . - STFi AVE NW - fc : ..� J'► Off:- 3. rF-- r"@, �{ ti' a �x:-.:r 'Ir' '',�' w rM/S.S\�k _ :F.`C !Vo,.y_,,:;: y l;'� �43.&.v,be : w'f � �.",O ITRU i �1:7F� .�__ .F I ?.' V � ''. ~'�¢] v 'CORAL --.WOOD DR3RD�AVE NW� ✓.r ORANGE:BL�pOySSOpM OR — .A. f� a F "DANIELSRD Y:# DIIAWN BY _ &lJ .. • f 's (' -IMMOKALEE RD- A* i:r T �^ 0 P� o Z Q L J l _F � Z �RT '•�� 0 , �ry w F •1;' I P r LEGEND: y WONDER WORLD DR- — — — APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF 1� a WALKED TRANSECTS r- .• �„•+ NOTES: AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHS WERE ACQUIRED m r THROUGH THE COLLIER COUNTY PROPERTY APPRAISER'S OFFICE WITH A FLIGHT DATE OF DECEMBER 2018. PROPERTY BOUNDARY ESTIMATED FROM THE COLLIER COUNTY PROPERTY APPRAISER'S GIS WEBSITE. DRAWN BY DATE FIGURE 2. AERIAL WITH BOUNDARY AND T.S. z/li/zo PASSARELLA - REVIEWED BY DATE - SURVEY TRANSECTS B.B. 2/11/20 REUSED DATE BLUE CORAL APARTMENTS & ASSOCIATES 04 LEE -BONIT-A-BEACHRD - - - - - - -� - - - - - LEGEND I • �J a+ ------- ------ ° ------------------ -------------- ---------------------_?--- I IF O V _ z O t— N z _Ep_ PROJECT LOCATION w E v m - - - - - �' 846 - - - - - - - - -- _A S� c� - - - � o s c) A 0 o COLLI Rv 0 1 2 m A Miles 'o v A 0 �X1 �^ - - - - VANDERBILT BEACH-RD - - - 0 - A • • 51 o GOLDEN GATE BLVD Y WZ o x C r J �LU •• W A O Z G O O • Q C J O (� - - - - - - - - - - - - PINE RIDGE RD J Z m vuj 3 - - - - GREEN-BLVD DRAWN BY DATE T.S. 2/11/20 FIGURE 3. DOCUMENTED OCCURRENCES OF LISTED SPECIES REVIEWED BY DATE PASSARELLA BLUE CORAL APARTMENTS B.B. 2/11/20=l & ASSOCIATES REVISED DATE °478 LEE BLVD C 1 z BLVD F (P m�� RO BLVD 20 rr� Co j � m KERI RDmtVETEASWO o o .1 r kE CAPE CORAL p` wy a w Z I , m I a HENDRY LEGEND 10, w LU 82 ti F D GLADIOLUS -DR gUMME ALICO RD a m L E E I CgPTNq '4 FS �Rp m CORKSCREW RD ° !2 DR 619018 4 + BO IT BEACH RD 17 G ,... ,.— — ,.... J ® C.p 910m LU Y d U „r A�Q OIL WELL RD S PROJECT LOCATION s o ' p VANDERBILT RD 0 4 8 Miles � I BEACH x D v r GOLDEN GATE BLVD i Z ° z � COLLIER y � ILL c r O w w Sk Z A a �o ,o RADIO RD w w x DAVIS BLVD 951 Gulf of a kk Mexico FIGURE 4. FLORIDA WOOD STORK NESTING COLONIES DRAWN BY T.S. DATE 2/14/20 PASSARELLA REVffi EDBY B.B. DATE 2/14/20 AND 18.6 MILE CORE FORAGING AREAS ` 'Iti'g �� ° ASSOCIATES REv sED DATE BLUE CORAL APARTMENTS -s a1o� & FIGURE 5. FLORIDA BONNETED BAT CONSULTATION AREA MAP BLUE CORAL APARTMENTS DRAWN BY DATE D.B. 3/10/20 REVIEWEDBY DATE �016PASSARELLA H.S. 3/10/20 coRiti REVISED DATE -� �O�OgiSt. ^' S S O C IATES 9 �l "ZI TILFA . _ •� . �d w .a1 yy�, c �� " .TILBAL r yk i I' �; �Y .. �.x .y kG f i1.-fR��.'jY -.�%s _ .. � •:.. � � Y.. � r f ..{ fir, •' .. .h 1:. r' � Y �. 'V��' �. • �� may* �. P L! v {, A yip 3iAe 1 } ' `� I� Y�yt�-�C�`'�t��'' ��4�'r�*'`�-{t`}39�'� `��iR. `��S�Sr.�• '9�'�•i I_ r � ,, j1n >�'� -�• S ; ' • �^ `�c . N• .'tom 7.. ENCTAM Ako r, ;; � ��... _ r �►. APPROXIMAT5"' 1 ''TILFAS P/L �� {��.�, '•yam rsR TILFAS "r.• .j LL TILFAS •'�: A •TILFAS �., g ► �` I • i I TILBAL • TILBAL7 A' ENCTAM"' • , :+r tl h- ` yr swS ,e R icy � � /� S ~' �= �ti�. �'' '111�.• .� � .� � h i kZ lip 14 AL ^" AM O 7w Al-aw"r on • w � I m L -IMMOKALEE RD- '"—k A -WONDER WORLD DR- � � T LEGEND: SFWMD WETLANDS (0.67 Ac.t) FLUCFCS % OF CODES DESCRIPTIONS ACREAGE TOTAL 4119 E2 PINE FLATWOODS, DISTURBED (25-49% EXOTICS) 2.63Ac.± 28.1% 4119 E3 PINE FLATWOODS, DISTURBED (50-75% EXOTICS) 1.75 Ac.± 18.7% 4119 E4 PINE FLATWOODS, DISTURBED (76-100%EXOTICS) 1.32Ac.± 14.1% 4159 E3 PINE, DISTURBED (50-75%EXOTICS) 1.51 Ac.± 16.1% 422 BRAZILIAN PEPPER 0.41 Ac.± 4.4% 437 AUSTRALIAN PINE 0.70Ac.± 7.5% 6309 E3 MIXED WETLAND FOREST, DISTURBED (50-75% EXOTICS) 0.52 Ac.± 5.6% 6309 E4 MIXED WETLAND FOREST, DISTURBED (76-100% EXOTICS) 0.15 Ac.± 1.6% 814 ROAD 0.36 Ac.± 3.9% TOTAL 9.35 Ac.± 100.0% NOTES AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHS WERE ACQUIRED THROUGH THE COLLIER COUNTY PROPERTY APPRAISER'S OFFICE WITH A FLIGHT DATE OF DECEMBER 2018. PROPERTY BOUNDARY PER PORTELLA & ASSOCIATES, LLC DRAWING No. P&A3066 ACADFILE.DWG DATED MARCH 2, 2020. FLUCFCS LINES ESTIMATED FROM 1'=200' AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHS AND LOCATIONS APPROXIMATED. FLUCFCS PER FLORIDA LAND USE, COVER AND FORMS CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM (FLUCFCS) (FOOT 1999). UPLAND/WETLAND LIMITS HAVE NOT BEEN REVIEWED BY ANY REGULATORY AGENCY AND ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE. R.F./T.S. 3/2/20 EXHIBIT B. AERIAL WITH FLUCFCS AND WETLANDS MAP REVIEWED BY DATE PAS SARE LLA B.B. IMMOKALEE ROAD INTERCHANGE RESIDENTIAL INFILL 3/z/zo °o I.m' ASSOCIATES SUBDISTRICT/BLUE CORAL APARTMENTS REVISED DATE v_ dgl IMMOKALEE ROAD INTERCHANGE RESIDENTIAL INFILL SUBDISTRICTBLUE CORAL APARTMENTS LISTED SPECIES SURVEY March 2020 1.0 INTRODUCTION This report documents the results of the listed species survey conducted by Passarella & Associates, Inc. on January 28, 2020 for the 9.35± acre Coral Blue Apartments (Project). The Project is comprised of 9.35± acres of forested lands, invaded by varying degrees of exotic vegetation located in Section 30, Township 48 South, Range 26 East, Collier County (Figure 1). The Project is located along the south side of Immokalee Road approximately 2,700 feet west of Interstate-75. More specifically the Project is bordered by Immokalee Road to the north, Bermuda Palms to the west, Livingston Lakes to the south, and undeveloped land to the east. 2.0 LITERATURE REVIEW AND FIELD SURVEY METHODOLOGY A literature review and field survey were conducted to determine whether the Project site was being utilized by state and/or federally listed species as identified by the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWCC) and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) as endangered, threatened, or species of special concern. In addition, the property was surveyed for plant species listed by the Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services and the USFWS as endangered, threatened, or commercially exploited and surveyed for plant species that are included on the Collier County Rare and Less Rare Plants lists (Land Development Code (LDC) Section 3.04.03). 2.1 Literature Review The literature review involved an examination of available information on listed species in the Project's geographical region. The literature sources reviewed included: Florida's Endangered and Threatened Species (FWCC 2018); Florida Atlas of Breeding Sites for Herons and Their Allies (Runde et al. 1991); National Bald Eagle Management Guidelines (USFWS 2007); the Florida Panther Habitat Preservation Plan (Logan et al. 1993); Landscape -Scale Conservation for the Florida Panther (Kautz et al. 2006); and USFWS and FWCC databases for telemetry locations of the Florida panther (Puma concolor coryi), bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus), red -cockaded woodpecker (Picoides borealis), Florida black bear (Ursus americanus floridanus), Florida scrub jay (Aphelocoma coerulescens), and wading bird rookeries (e.g., wood stork (Mycteria americana)) in Collier County. The FWCC and USFWS database information is updated on a periodic basis and is current through different dates, depending on the species. The FWCC information that was reviewed is current through the noted dates for the following four species: Florida D-1 panther telemetry — June 2019; bald eagle nest locations — 2017; black bear telemetry — December 2007; and red -cockaded woodpecker locations 2006. 2.2 Field Survey The field survey was conducted during daylight hours by qualified ecologists walking parallel belt transects across the Project site. Transects were spaced to ensure that sufficient visual coverage of ground and flora was obtained. Approximate transect locations and spacing are shown on Figure 2. At regular intervals the ecologists stopped, remained quiet, and listened for wildlife vocalizations. The survey was conducted with the aid of 8x or 1 Ox power binoculars. 3.0 RESULTS 3.1 Literature Review No red -cockaded woodpecker colonies or cavity trees have been documented on the Project site. The closest documented colonies are approximately 1,700 feet south and 3,000 feet southeast of the Project site (Figure 3). The red -cockaded woodpecker is a state and federally listed endangered species. One bald eagle nest location is documented by FWCC approximately 3,200 feet to the north of the Project site (Figure 3). The Project site is located well outside of the USFWS designated 660-foot buffer zone for bald eagle nests. The bald eagle is not a listed species but is protected under the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act and the Migratory Bird Treaty Act. According to the FWCC data, the Project falls within the core foraging area (CFA) of one recorded wood stork colony (Figure 4). Colony No. 619081 is located approximately 10.75± miles northeast of the Project site. The wetlands on the Project site provide limited foraging potential for wood storks due to their dense canopy and exotic species coverage. The wood stork is a state and federally listed threatened species. The Project site is located within the USFWS Florida bonneted bat (Eumops floridanus) consultation area (Figure 5). The Florida bonneted bat is a state and federally listed endangered species. There are five plant species listed on the "Less Rare Plant" list per Collier County's LDC Section 3.04.03 (Requirements for Protected Plants) that could occur within habitats on the Project site. They include Florida butterfly orchid (Encyclia tampensis), giant wild pine (Tillandsia utriculata), inflated wild pine (T. balbisiana), stiff -leaved wild pine (T. fasciculata), and twisted air plant (T. flexuosa). Five plant species are listed on the "Rare Plant" list per Collier County's LDC Section 3.04.03 (Requirements for Protected Plants). They include Cowhorn orchid (Cyrtopodium punctatum), Curtiss's milkweed D-2 (Asclepias curtissii), Florida clamshell orchid (Encyclia cochleata), Ghost orchid (Polyrrhiza lindenii), and West Coast prickly apple (Harrisia gracilis). 3.2 Field Survey The field survey was conducted on January 28, 2020. Weather conditions during the survey were partly cloudy skies, with five to ten miles per hour northeasterly winds, and temperatures in the low 70s. The field survey documented three listed plant species on the Project site: stiff -leaved wild pine, inflated wild pine, and Florida butterfly orchid. These epiphytic plant species were found throughout the Project site located on live and dead oaks (Quercus sp.), pines (Pinus sp.), and melaleuca (Melaleuca quinquenervia) (Figure 5). 4.0 SUMMARY The literature search and review of agency databases found documented occurrences for no listed species on the Project site. The Project site is not located within the vicinity of an active bald eagle nest and is located within one documented wood stork colony CFA. The Project site is located within the USFWS consultation area for the Florida bonneted bat. The January 28, 2020 field survey documented three listed plant species on the Project site: stiff - leaved wild pine, inflated wild pine, and Florida butterfly orchid. No listed wildlife species were observed. 5.0 REFERENCES Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission. 2018. Florida's Endangered and Threatened Species. Official Lists, Bureau of Non -Game Wildlife, Division of Wildlife. Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission. Tallahassee, Florida. Kautz, R., R. Kawula, T. Hoctor, J. Comiskey, D. Jansen, D. Jennings, J. Kasbohm, F. Mazzotti, R. McBride, L. Richardson, K. Root. 2006. How much is enough? Landscape -scale conservation for the Florida panther. Biological Conservation, Volume 130, Issue 1, Pages 118-133 Logan, Todd, Andrew C. Eller, Jr., Ross Morrell, Donna Ruffner, and Jim Sewell. 1993. Florida Panther Habitat Preservation Plan South Florida Population. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; Gainesville, Florida. D-3 Runde, D.E., J.A. Gore, J.A. Hovis, M.S. Robson, and P.D. Southall. 1991. Florida Atlas of Breeding Sites for Herons and Their Allies, Update 1986 - 1989. Nongame Wildlife Program Technical Report No. 10. Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission, Tallahassee, Florida. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2007. National Bald Eagle Management Guidelines. CORSO*_ z r � U o I�-- ..� - P Z. .. .: . .. Z... gyp: w u WIGGINS PASS'RD: IN -,. .. ..n, .*--�;� pRD LNi i m c+. . 5� •I', - - . SENTRADAAVE .•ia .. a ERIAL"GOLFCOU, ,qT:c'i' i • _ �� :'ifS*• :y,= ;•%., .; t•. I dz.:. =.•.. .3c.. ,r:ERIF'DRr „ Z ✓ A > - �y5"'•' - sVn Y:r :� •V OR PEI Lu 0. 1'z., Nfi F. c;0.? w v >. PROJECT O ^• . �.! ❑ �^� f. J.._.. SEC 1 ��0 0''"��y�n• 'i t�"i.r'ey�vS\ ... �< a. R F. �. gyp° er-0 �� "��•Ir EXIT !k >' �' � .r a ri'• ''li�E.-`'F 6}_ :.'.�: PIPER BLVD 1 - IMMOKALEERD �k 111 i;' _�' • =RE`'. .,Epp-'� = AUTUMN:OAKSLN- , W`,e - CAR KSIDE.BLVD � r:Y": %., :• ax-.: '0 zi_ ':.,•_' Ni. (_ `'r\ ��z O Z .,k.H, �. T�->rn,= r.,�y l'Vq�`?i OrL:,�-I I i HIDDEN OAKSLNZ �a0",�i•s Q•� l"! OP g w A O �3uq- MOmAZY m1. *TRL r'•�75 ``• ;[e'.N g• I -J ..�y�-iC �Np ► w ; �'r m SP NISH OAKS LN m tii` cD.k`' aZ_ hw �fl � � =A •� Z. � Y &� k, -QV, � .. Q z ••.� �'t t 1NO ' ,.Yt y p n r 98TH AVE N �7N fi v .p, GOLDEN OAKS LN J SATUR .z :' 97TH AV E!NJ;H4t`l 95TH AVE4,TH N �' ..PFC/Cq -_ ', M;RR ,,,.c: n..9:..�,u�-•j- ,,... • : ,y - � 1 94TH=AVEIN' -'`. N-MAR$H.�BLVD €; �''p+�:�' y ''e�' x�y; �,� \ i... STANDING OAKS.LN_ = A R ars w: :" u 91 ST AVE' N STiQq ,r\y,. .\ ^VNCI`O'.�• JL ! ��r. N�VO -SHADY OAKS:LN �:''"< �... TIBURO �� .. '�dl -r':;2�3 a7�-Ih��.= r rM�q� �•� y... Z `y.•k,o-:yc �,•.x. ' If.. f'v..!N -x w H\ BUROAKSLN—_ ❑ c a x wENGLISH OAKSLN - - - n ¢ BAY\- •� 1 + . ��.- \ I .�. _ q DWALKCIR- x O ❑ ,.� p .LL `i� _ r cs z AN DE_R BIL•T-B EACH'RD �,b10 J/ r E _ r.. 3 j > ".i• j. 30 W�IE "H4 I? [.. 4..: ,�1' ii�:'nin:is; Y& Q yy _ %• - .,R.'. m .7 ,O :r 99 "st};T._�:. �::- °: t=a.:'IF '7TH•AVENW- ..O i. . -4 d'�:, f VFS �_ c. $I�K:3, - CHERRY•WOOD DR Lu -[ ¢ . y ..� •p . o^ .'i�. R o F. y x o.- px sv �k m EM 5' o. NW - .�.Ri $. is f r x• 13 STH AVE F N i Ot DR_ F....�❑i.y� ;'e'yrt"rir.� '%' s F! •..�;:: °�= z 1HICKORYMOOD OR wCITRUSCIR �l .CORAWOOD D3RD AVE NW ONO ORANGE BLOSSOM .]n`r• Q !�. ?,�,.. `x.'a�:_� w.-may.'' . ••��{f1� j4' r, ':.bi; �r • .DANIELSRD- �. '�' f 's (' -IMMOKALEE RD- A* i:r T �^ 0 P� o Z Q L J l _F � Z �RT '•�� 0 , �ry w F •1;' I P r z LEGEND: y -WONDER WORLD DR- — — — APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF 1� a WALKED TRANSECTS r-.• va. r NOTES: AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHS WERE ACQUIRED m r THROUGH THE COLLIER COUNTY PROPERTY APPRAISER'S OFFICE WITH A FLIGHT DATE OF DECEMBER 2018. PROPERTY BOUNDARY ESTIMATED FROM THE COLLIER COUNTY PROPERTY APPRAISER'S GIS WEBSITE. - DRAWN BY DATE FIGURE 2. AERIAL WITH BOUNDARY AND T.S. z/li/zo I&PASSARELLA - REVIEWED BY DATE - SURVEY TRANSECTS B.B. z/11/zo �o��,r;,g CORAL BLUE APARTMENTS REV SED DATE — E='�� & ASSOCIATES LEE 0 BONITA BEACH RD , -- 1 LEGEND 1 � ------- ------ °�----------------- --------- ----------. ------- ---- 6 V a G�:7o z0 N 41 r In z z PROJECT LOCATION J w E m �� 846 • • o S G�GA O tt ® In O W In -4 COLLI R0 P p Miles 'p o m IFS VANDERBILT BEACH RD Q • • 951 o • GOLDEN GATE BLVD wz c: o • F A � o w z a o • • 0 0 0 0 c� PINE RIDGE RD v • O p G! � � • z J Q i GREEN BLVD U • • DRAWNBY T.S. DATE 2/11/20 FIGURE 3. DOCUMENTED OCCURRENCES OF LISTED SPECIES ASSARELLA REVIEWED BY DATE CORAL BLUE APARTMENTS B.B. 2/11/20 r_r , �`'`c & ASSOCIATES 4' REVISED DATE a _ 78 J — LEE c5 w BLVD � VETENAS-PKW-KW� N� ❑,,;vJo>�,.�m aOV �LLCZ O bBLVD IJ y� uj w y_ > J 00 w HENDRY KERIR ` LEGEND ti. f,o CA EpRgLPK z DANIELS PKWY III a m 82 a i s Ir / ~ GLADIOLUS DR _ _� SUMMERLIN�� - ALICO RD 1 i m LEE T IN 0 CORKSCREW RD l Cq p d y TNq h, DR m .. 04 � 0 619018 849 j1 o T fl P� ! Cn Q f B: dTA BEACH RD s 846 � �'� Y a FV -- E ` U W { PROJECT LOCATION OIL WELL RD S p VANDERBILTBEACH 0 4 8 Miles RD ❑ GOLDEN GATE BLVD Y A o T� z N V qa c� COLLIER J m W ay c LLO W z Q O J70 a' \ ❑ o 7 ' O RADIO RD % W C - , DAVIS BLVD 951 Gulf of Mexico FIGURE 4. FLORIDA WOOD STORK NESTING COLONIES DMNVNBY DATE T.S. 2/14/20 PAS REVIEWED BY B.B. DATE 2/14/20 AND 18.6 MILE CORE FORAGING AREAS SAR E LLA REVISED DATE CORAL BLUE APARTMENTS `�.�� &ASSOCIATES E ASC i r- r � •HIL OR UGH19 I �9 - I 01 ! FF I 4 I I MANATEE Wu LEGEND df 0 N W E S 0 10 20 Miles 'f E FIGURE 5. FLORIDA BONNETED BAT CONSULTATION D.B. 3/10/20 REVIEWED BY DATE PASSARELLA AREA MAP H.S. 3/10/20 CORAL BLUE APARTMENTS REVISED DATE —= L.knln8irn ASSOCIATES �l "ZI TILFA . _ •� . �d w .a1 yy�, c �� " .TILBAL r yk i I' �; �Y .. �.x .y kG f i1.-fR��.'jY -.�%s _ .. � •:.. � � Y.. � r f ..{ fir, •' .. .h 1:. r' Y �. 'V��' . • �� may* �. 7• r� P L! v {, A yip 3iAe 1 } ' `� I� Y�yt�-�C�`'�t�i,�'' ��4�'r�*'`�-{t`}39�'� '��iR. `��S�Sr.�• '9�'�•i IRE. r XW, � ,, j1n >�'-�• S ; ' • �^ `�c . N• .'tom 7.. ENCTAM Ako r, ;; � ��... _ r �►. APPROXIMAT5"' 1 ''TILFAS P/L �� {��.�, '•yam rsR TILFAS "r.• .j TILFAS•LL TILFAS �., g ► �` I G •• i I TILBAL • TILBAL7 A' ENCTAM"' • , :+r tl h- ` yr swS ,e its � � /S ~' �= 'ti: •r' '1��.• .� � .� h i lip r � 9 ^" AM O 7w rk. ,F ", - ".•' - r•;_1 ., %. •'V -•e a •- , - - r - r.4: - o .1i - 'P. r ; 1' - - . , /IJ )VIP kv NOT - r t .. g., . � :Y-_ ; � � :'S T•, it a ;4.,, -� 'f" ♦, i i -_ , -� .'/M,".A,',• ! _ 'die. ► r — — e e w , ,. .. - > � a .jay ,., � A. '.. /3 %_:. r, ,. _ -: ._ ., ,.-,,. II ,',I ,. ..+ ,a.. •,. _. _i�. a A... - .. •-tea t� ...- r<s- _ � ,�a . ._. ..' ,f; .ls .. .. ,:. �, _. w-1. .: ,. ,i :'�: .,- •. _ , I � ,• ,. ,.' :., -s. y, , , • ti: 1 \ I II I , 1. �•� - -�. - ,;max • - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ _ - - - - - � - - • - _ - - _ _ - - - , . ..: .'T�TI?I-fl" � — ♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦a I Ci o I II II /-:- i1,a , /♦♦♦♦♦♦♦ ♦ ♦♦� c, c7 nnn C r, �.1.11 ... - - -.. - - - - - .' `, I I \ K Ll a ` III "• :. ► . .. ,.:. :< .� .,.� _ — '- ■ram -r.� ,. r♦♦♦♦♦♦♦ ♦ cull PINY., ::, _ ,I�,,�? o��, -: :; - .. .`. _ _ �� i- - - I r III, ,,. b � � - .. -' � / ,5 I, �•�� .: - � ono , ©[: - - ' :: __ - I ` I _ �,.. : � d• - f # _•, ;. ...� . ' I� � � � I �. Its,.z«,a-.-ter=.: I , VI I I I , r` � �:. _... ! - ._. �Y, ' uij ..H •I ,. I I I l I I : "4 / - r.. -; iipl 5 - 1 ' .. a ,1 / e i » : �4 II a , 1 , ,e 1 .lr: ,: � :_ _ ., ,.- --._ —i •. III j } / - : r -,+ - A , .iF� �I ,y � ram" �1 /� a I a I gg , • Ie I c r r / I' I I . III�IIVm�^ • _ .:: 4 � _ ,,, ., � 1 >K .:= ... , i � _ react - - .. ♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦1♦ ♦♦ \ .: 1 Y •'•i;'t,'. _ p '•�i •6., _ - A ♦♦♦♦♦.♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦• o ! - '� _: :-. �i►i♦i♦i♦i♦i♦i♦i♦i♦i♦i♦i♦i♦i♦i�i♦i� - �T'vr,., � _ , ; F . , - '- � , - ` ,�1-;,, is 4 :A a .,. .� Y , � � �♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦♦� o o I�!j/ o � � I '� _ 1 I t I , a A� • r , A : , ; : 1 I; i x .6• � •�aasw. sue' +. i'�#,_�iL � r ' �_ a ► x ,'. ice'.`., .,"� : - a F - '. iTw Y, ::"_ .,.,.:. _ _. 't. ' .. .. '� A .-♦ •�," _ �' • ..: :3 ' . , �.� _ 7�'- - is �', � `+` It a , • 4 u� t I� �V "1 : „ a , , x y f • I • VW dd , �� -..� �' _ .. -,.: ..-, .. : ,-...<:- - � - k:.; d ,k • I _ �p. , i I -- y ;.... ! i._'. sue, '+!-S►'�;c - :F.�, ,. ' .a : : � 4 :: : m > . — >, .—., Jam- � .: , , •• _ ! .. hy� tj J , 1. _ 7 � v:. � I J- / /- tan s"+.�- "a•'V ''d-Ile•tF. '3 � - re 00 - �m .. <i , _ ♦ �o-, " :.c . z'•t ...... .: ' .'..' s : .:L � I I I I Kfi �: f'.ai I `A _ _ y I ;1 f• • _ s t a a II I I .1 f - �►, :� - r — ..{ ,•. J::: a yj. ' ' i .is .- •` ..'. :. ,[�.'; •', _. a ... y. 1Fr, fr: i _ - I .. _.'. w. �• R' :._ "•=-".:t: a4 .. _ a I I I \ ,�. f I .a / y ,,g Y U ,{ 1 + I , " `.1. : �• � � � ,; - . ..- , , ` � '. .:�., '-.t : .- _.v, �; -o'!�■ � • - I I .; I I - i,�-"- ■.r4a:.w'�aaca- - .,r I : u a ♦ • id,. 1„ , Ae�i `\ s- -'Y 'Y' • • • • ♦ I I I I - , a>f.�..•,.a _ - _ \ � nm .. �n■n _ . ._• - .r , _ . ��.,x.�:.�.-- ., .r..a •f� �o _ =_,dl� , lu -I r owl r �• • • • • . 0 ■ ,. � /• `� "�'' ,•�.-, - ;, '. .. ; �,... v, ,. .:.. - ':sir... +� �� "� � 1 i 1 • • • • • e;i _ � r, `�, .y , IN I .,,J ��: Tom. ., �• • • • • . rK. , , • N , f, , e n , ;I ? i . , ,. J , . - " - , . l �' - ., - �salr.:u. .■.�"v ;.•' ....... - AA - r .i� :�i' ii:. ��•y1$ ; -'`'. - - `,. ,�, .. ', ,:. ,�,�._ -•.�'� . ,,' • . !�� r► ors � � ,� ;� .��, ._ - py r I , .: ; ,r k - a IS , •,r� f , } I ,� t• L .A' 1 , Oftf. , Lb . r 1 , , I � 'x 1 I r! i l i _ c F b , • a V / F - � • - I I AF • £ —■r ,, 4 ..,.�' - �- _�. C' a 1. .0 y" '�, �` ;S`•.: '.wax: .�! u - 7.1 wy ,. '.: .. /' ,r., :'. , ."►:a.._ 1. I , - . „ , •• v 1 , r ,I r AIR , t _ .J :.. '- '-:rE � ., .: _ \ ,i,,..:�:r...•, ::: 1 • '•:, w,..� ...>.. �.: _4 .. - _-„_ _ Ili d��,�'.0 a .�• � _,d • Professional Engineers, Planners, Surveyors & Landscape Architects Airyy d _ , OL Met ow z Ott N rr A • v , 7 1 WIN, n � r � �glo Oakes Farm� '�• ' , k n a Seed to Table ,� 7 Y is Y ,�, fry nl 17 �' o OW Zoo �,�b.,! Carlton Lakes ' '"R•!i _- _�. ... �� • a PSI` ` ; 4 .. 1 d A .,-,I YJ �yx^,�' ,p,. .�■ A{. r n 1 .. ' i.. - '.li L� . '9 6,1}... 1' r�' , r , in. tICC h _ �yLr a � r - o II ' I qrmi6w aim r+�., ,yid � ..,, ... :•-------- - ,� �''� �„ L , 1 y I rr , .1 , r' y n, is .r' '1 - - j . ` w „ II �-f 1: - 1 - .. '. - � . '' _- y� _ Tw rr7.- T rn �•�7 � �, 'h � r r 1 w 4 x _ � ? w w1 w w x � . r ; A 'A +* „R + r r �i}TII. !'! � " '� n�'„t • .� w wl I_�i' - a . — _ — � �� -�` - - - _ — — , Immokale_e-Road,--- � f % I - ^ y w w r, + ,_ •^' R ,� w. r� , - � � !T � �' � � fS• i ,. �ti as ; �' � �, w.. � , . !S �• � • ' is : L y 3 , R r A -t, ` 1UltimateVerizon '" 3- I �' - a Chase :. - �;�. -�- � � ' - �`� � 1 .� Express AW�� rele�SS an • a ): ,�. )_ a F. Car Wash L- 3RY ` II' i „ , s r Windson - i� Club - �� ; _ _, Bermuda `' �� 1 �. ' Extra ; ..: r� n - A a rtments Palms `,tiw► ; ►.►�� _� r p Spa ce —� r I _ _ _ e * G.'i��/% !I■ •tT:w1A - v Storage • 164w :; � C 11 ��. • - 1, � 1 �11 � - �� + s � :p l �M1` I >• 6 r , - ,< Sub ect �._�►�A �7L � � _ I - � • l: v : c �I's� 1 �`�'. �• Imo. , -� Site - _ ��i Walmart - µ:- e - y ' rt �dq r , Ir ILI Supercenter T 10 :w. 1 - ._ 1 11"� � - ` - •:� :r'�i� �, ��' V -- F.C+1 ,A.,.�. A, `�°�ir, � ^.an �■�� 1�1a -'' '�.; ' � w ,!, r - _ , AM,r. �1 4 r w_ C R` I - i _ I r 1 r 1.18 AC 1.35 AC 2.41 AC G ti .. , - *07 f i lar •yr `g Ir ' •1 �! A +"' _lo r M ,ri ,r�'n M .n I , re ./ " " + n I -- I I J i. -"wwi ' �. :•Ise•.s{r '`•' 4 w `' r ,y , yy . N ngston Lakes - •• �;I +� ,- _ r , I i v, I , r ; w , - ,. . yd tit , f $ � a p_ !. , IF . i Ne , , y ^ -r -, r 41b,,� r � •fit!' i',a , ov s 'A KIT A t 1 4S' 1 i 111.. �^i .�^ d � � ,,. ,, . ..; ,• � '" .\ _ rah e .f r r i. ,� ... 4i ,: •_ ... .: " ... ., I A ' _ _. r .,. - ,., .. _. : ,. ..�. .. �j "'re°:. :i,•.:: . . ,,.! /' ,C. r .:. ■ .. ram_._ :.: _ III i _ - - - - �. - - ;Ff\ r VA - i¢a- 0. • y, • y 4 f .; A,� :..r. , l.'. ac..� r' I '....'�`' 1 ;,Al ,..r.um^,r1.=Y,. ,y., ,77 - _ tys gyp, •.,�q�,_ �� 1 Aw ��.A n y ,•� a r- k.. i , ,y. "., �.: , . o.'y� i� . y-f4R.. - , iI _ RT7 - 1 / 1-- - 1 AN NAL , i' Ll "i a .. I' M IR 1 q # J� GNOLI ■MENEM■■■M Blue Coral Apart """ ARBER & Prope """� RUNDAGE INc. Landscape ments rty Preserve C �l A, 14 Le end Subject Site Preserve A, T�I Exhibit: X.A. 10 ABB PN: 20-0003 v TPeNCOCH planning -engineering Traffic Impact Statement Blue Coral Apartments Growth Management Plan Amendment (GMPA) Planned Unit Development Rezone (PUDZ) Prepared for: Agnoli, Barber & Brundage, Inc. 7400 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 200 Naples, FL 34108 Phone: 239-597-3111 Collier County, Florida 05/29/2020 Prepared by: Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA 2800 Davis Boulevard, Suite 200 Naples, FL 34104 Phone: 239-566-9551 Email: ntrebilcock@trebilcock.biz Collier County Transportation Methodology Fee* — $500.00 Fee Collier County Transportation Review Fee* — Maior Study — $1,500.00 Fee Note — *to be collected at time of first submittal Blue Coral Apartments — GMPA/PUDZ — TIS — May 2020 Statement of Certification I certify that this Traffic Impact Statement has been prepared by me or under my immediate supervision and that I have experience and training in the field of Traffic and Transportation Engineering. This item has been electronically signed and sealed by Norman J. Trebilcock, AICP, PE, State of Florida license 47116, using a SHA-1 authentication code. Printed copies of this document are not considered signed and sealed, and the SHA-1 authentication code must be verified on any electronic copies. ;.oQ..�� SF•.oC: 2: No 47116 O'. STATE OF 441� �. 4 O R\ O P �N�� - /O N A� Digitally signed by Norman Trebilcock DN: c=US, st=Florida,l=Naples, o=Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA, cn=Norman Trebilcock, email=ntrebilcock@trebilcock. biz Date: 2020.06.03 09:49:39 -04'00' Norman J. Trebilcock, AICP, P.E. FL Registration No. 47116 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA 2800 Davis Boulevard, Suite 200 Naples, FL 34104 Company Cert. of Auth. No. 27796 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 2 Blue Coral Apartments — GMPA/PUDZ — TIS — May 2020 Table of Contents ProjectDescription.......................................................................................................................................4 TripGeneration.............................................................................................................................................5 Trip Distribution and Assignment.................................................................................................................6 BackgroundTraffic........................................................................................................................................8 Existing and Future Roadway Network......................................................................................................... 9 Project Impacts to Area Roadway Network -Link Analysis............................................................................9 Site Access Turn Lane Analysis.................................................................................................................... 11 Scenario 1— Immokalee Road — Shared Access — Right-in/Right-out Connection.................................12 Scenario 2 — Immokalee Road — Shared Access — Right-in/Right-out/Left-in Connection .....................12 ImprovementAnalysis................................................................................................................................ 13 Mitigationof Impact...................................................................................................................................13 Appendices Appendix A: Project Master Site Plan........................................................................................................ 14 Appendix B: Initial Meeting Checklist (Methodology Meeting)................................................................. 17 Appendix C: ITE Trip Generation Calculations and Land Use Code Descriptions ...................................... 24 Appendix D: Collier County Northwest TCMA...........................................................................................37 Appendix E: Turning Movements Exhibits.................................................................................................40 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 3 Blue Coral Apartments — GMPA/PUDZ — TIS — May 2020 Project Description The Blue Coral Apartments project is located on the south side of Immokalee Road (County Road 846) between Livingston Road (County Road 881) and I-75, and lies within Section 30, Township 48 South, Range 26 East, in Collier County, Florida. The subject property is approximately 9.35 acres in size. Refer to Figure 1— Project Location Map and Appendix A: Project Master Site Plan. Figure 1— Project Location Map ' Project :.: P 0 s VBanN Ya(tles Real EelaleQ .• _W..—.• ,n0ee.n l.ineQ �,.Pulalwn Map data ©2020 1000 ft E The purpose of this report is to document the transportation impacts associated with the proposed Growth Management Plan Amendment (GMPA) and the associated Planned Unit Development Rezone (PUDZ). The project site is vacant and is currently zoned "A" — Agriculture. The subject project is a proposed residential development that will consist of up to 280 multifamily dwelling units. Traffic generation associated with the proposed development is evaluated generally based on ITE Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition and ITE Trip Generation Handbook, 3rd Edition. The proposed ITE land use designations are determined based on the ITE Land Use Code (LUC) descriptions and are intended to provide the highest and best use trip generation scenario with respect to the project's proposed development parameters. The proposed development parameters are illustrated in Table 1. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 14 Blue Coral Apartments — GMPA/PUDZ — TIS — May 2020 Table 1 Proposed Development Program Development Land Use - [SIC Codes] ITE LUC Size (dwelling units) Residential Multifamily — [N/A] 221 — Multifamily Housing (Mid -Rise) 280 For the purposes of this report, the future planning horizon year is assumed 2025. The project proposes to connect to Immokalee Road via a shared access with the adjacent development to the east, Germain Immokalee PUD. As such, generated traffic may access Juliet Boulevard via Useppa Way. In addition, proposed development will provide one interconnection to the residential property to the west, Bermuda Palms. A methodology meeting was held with the Collier County Transportation Planning staff on March 13, 2020, via email. Refer to Appendix B: Initial Meeting Checklist (Methodology Meeting. Trip Generation Consistent with the adopted Collier County Traffic Impact Study (TIS) Guidelines and Procedures, traffic generated by the proposed development is estimated using the latest ITE Trip Generation Manual. The software program OTISS (Online Traffic Impact Study Software, most current version, is used to create the raw unadjusted trip generation for the project. The ITE rates and equations are used for the trip generation calculations, as applicable. The ITE — OTISS trip generation calculation worksheets are provided in Appendix C: ITE Trip Generation Calculations and Land Use Code Descriptions. Based on ITE recommendations and consistent with Collier County TIS Guidelines and Procedures, no reductions for internal capture or pass -by trips are considered for this project. The trip generation associated with the proposed build -out conditions is summarized in Table 2A. Table 2A Project Trip Generation — Build -out Conditions — Average Weekday In agreement with the Collier County TIS guidelines, significantly impacted roadways are identified based on the proposed project highest peak hour trip generation (net external traffic) and consistent with the peak hour of the adjacent street traffic. Based on the information contained in Collier County 2019 Annual Update and Inventory Report (AUIR), the peak hour for the adjacent roadway network is PM peak hour. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 15 Blue Coral Apartments — GMPA/PUDZ — TIS — May 2020 Based on the projected traffic illustrated in Table 2A, the maximum total daily trip generation for the proposed development shall not exceed 119 two-way PM peak hour new trips based on the land use codes in the ITE Trip Generation Manual in effect at the time of application for SDP/SDPA or subdivision plat approval, as applicable. The site operational analysis reflects projected AM and PM peak hour traffic. Since the proposed connection to Immokalee Road is a shared access with the property to the east (Germain Immokalee PUD), a trip generation evaluation for Germain Immokalee PUD development is provided in Table 2B. For the purposes of this report, the Germain Immokalee PUD will allow development of a car dealership building with up to 80,000 square feet in size. The proposed site plan for this project is illustrated in Appendix A. For trip generation details refer to Appendix C. Tahla 7R Germain Immokalee PUD — Build -out — Trip Generation — Average Weekday 66 100 166 Trip Distribution and Assignment The traffic generated by the proposed project is assigned to the adjacent roadways using the knowledge of the area and as coordinated within the methodology meeting. The site -generated trip distribution is shown in Table 3 and it is graphically depicted in Figure 2 — Project Distribution by Percentage and by PM Peak Hour. Table 3 Proposed Development —Traffic Distribution for PM Peak Hour 42.1 Airport Rd to Livingston Rd 25% EB — 18 WB —12 42.2 Livingston Rd to Project 60% EB-44 42.2 Project to 1-75 40% WB — 29 EB — 18 =&-75 to Logan Blvd 10% EB — 5 IM 51.0 North of Immokalee Rd 15% SB —11 NB-7 _wouth of Immokalee Rd NO% NB — 15 SB — 9 Note(s): *Peak hour, peak direction traffic volumes are underlined and bold to be used in Roadway Link Level of Service calculations. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 6 Blue Coral Apartments — GMPA/PUDZ — TIS — May 2020 Figure 2 — Project Distribution by Percentage and by PM Peak Hour Pro'ect Trip Distribution 1 P Absorption by Percentage F, so% zs% 0 ao% o% E H F3 Q G t Go gle Map data ©2020 1000 ft 9 7by ect Trip Distribution NB 7 PM Peak Hour se 11 wB 28 wB 29 w EB 44 EB 18 c WB 12 r n r EB NB 15 SB 9 y _ .Q Go gle Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 7 Blue Coral Apartments — GMPA/PUDZ — TIS — May 2020 Background Traffic Average background traffic growth rates are estimated for the segments of the roadway network in the study area using the Collier County Transportation Planning Staff guidance of a minimum 2% growth rate, or the historical growth rate from peak hour peak direction volume (estimated from 2008 through 2019), whichever is greater. Another way to derive the background traffic is to use the 2019 Annual Update and Inventory Report (AUIR) volume plus the trip bank volume. The higher of the two determinations is to be used in the Roadway Link Level of Service analysis. Table 4, Background Traffic without Project illustrates the application of projected growth rates to generate the projected background (without project) peak hour peak direction traffic volume for the build -out year 2025. Table 4 Background Traffic without Project (2019 - 2025) 2025 Projected 2025 2019 AUIR Projected Pk Hr, Peak Dir Projected Pk cc Pk Hr, Pk Dir Traffic Background Hr, Peak Dir Roadway AUIR Roadway Link Background Annual Growth Traffic Volume Trip Background Link Link Location Traffic Growth Factor w/out Project Bank Traffic Volume ID # Volume Rate (trips/hr) w/out Project (trips/hr) (%/yr)* Growth (trips/hr) Trip Factor** Bank*** Immokalee Airport Rd to 42.1 2,780 2.00% 1.1262 3,131 9 2,789 Rd Livingston Rd Immokalee Livingston Rd to Rd 42.2 Project 2,550 2.00% 1.1262 2,872 37 2,587 Immokalee Rd 42.2 Project to I-75 2,550 2.00% 1.1262 2,872 37 2,587 Immokalee I-75 to Logan Rd 43.1 Blvd 2,360 2.49% 1.1590 2,736 587 2,947 Livingston North of 51.0 1,230 2.00% 1.1262 1,386 59 1,289 Rd Immokalee Rd Livingston South of 52.0 1,800 2.00% 1.1262 2,028 26 1,826 Rd Immokalee Rd Note(s): *Annual Growth Rate— Historical Growth Rate or 2% minimum. **Growth Factor = (1 + Annual Growth Rate)6. 2025 Projected Volume = 2019 AUIR Volume x Growth Factor. ***2025 Projected Volume = 2019 AUIR Volume +Trip Bank. The projected 2025 Peak Hour — Peak Direction Background Traffic is the greater of the Growth Factor or Trip Bank calculation, which is underlined and bold as applicable. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 18 Blue Coral Apartments — GMPA/PUDZ — TIS — May 2020 Existing and Future Roadway Network The existing roadway conditions are extracted from the Collier County 2019 AUIR and the project roadway conditions are based on the current Collier County 5-Year Work Program. Roadway improvements that are currently under construction or are scheduled to be constructed within the five- year Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP) or Capital Improvement program (CIP) are considered to be committed improvements. As no such improvements were identified in the Collier County 2019 AUIR, the evaluated roadways are anticipated to remain as such through project build -out. The existing and future roadway conditions are illustrated in Table 5, Existing and Future Roadway Conditions. Table 5 Existing and Future Roadway Conditions 2019 Peak 2025 Peak CC AUIR Roadway Link 2019 Min. Dir, Peak Hr 2025 Dir, Peak Hr Roadway Link Roadway Standard Roadway Link ID # Location Condition LOS Capacity Condition Capacity Volume Volume Immokalee Rd 42.1 Airport Rd to 6D E 3,100 (WB) 6D 3,100 (WB) Livingston Rd Immokalee Rd 42.2 Livingston Rd to 6D/8D E 3,500 (EB) 6D/8D 3,500 (EB) Project Immokalee Rd 42.2 Project to 1-75 6D/8D E 3,500 (EB) 6D/8D 3,500 (EB) Immokalee Rd 43.1 1-75 to Logan 6D/8D E 3,500 (EB) 6D/8D 3,500 (EB) Blvd Livingston Rd 51.0 North of 6D/4D D 3,000 (NB) 6D/4D 3,000 (NB) Immokalee Rd Livingston Rd 52.0 South of 6D E 3,100 (NB) 6D 3,100 (NB) Immokalee Rd Note(s): 2U = 2-lane undivided roadway; 4D, 6D, 8D = 4-lane, 6-lane, 8-lane divided roadway, respectively; LOS = Level of Service. Based on the information illustrated in the Collier County Current Planning Studies webpage, The Immokalee Road Corridor Congestion Study is currently underway. The study will evaluate the future levels of congestion in the Immokalee Road Corridor between Livingston Road and Logan Boulevard. This report is expected to be completed in the spring of 2021. Project Impacts to Area Roadway Network -Link Analysis The Collier County Transportation Planning Services developed Level of Service (LOS) volumes for the roadway links impacted by the project, which are evaluated to determine the project impacts to the area roadway network in the future horizon year 2025. The Collier County Transportation Planning Services guidelines have determined that a project will be considered to have a significant and adverse impact if both the percentage volume capacity exceeds 2% of the capacity for the link directly accessed Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 19 Blue Coral Apartments — GMPA/PUDZ — TIS — May 2020 by the project and for the link adjacent to the link directly accessed by the project; 3% for other subsequent links and if the roadway is projected to operate below the adopted LOS standard. Table 6, Roadway Link Level of Service illustrates the LOS traffic impacts of the project to the area roadway network. Table 6 Roadway Link Level of Service (LOS) — With Project in the Year 2025 Roadway Min LOS Min LOS CC 2025 Peak 2025 Peak /a Vol Link Peak exceeded exceeded Roadway AUIR Roadway Link Dir, Peak Dir, Peak Hr Capacity Dir, Peak Hr without with Link Link ID Location Hr Capacity Volume Impact by # Volume (project Vol w/Project** Project Project? Project? Added)* Yes/No Yes/No Immokalee Airport Rd to Rd 42.1 Livingston Rd 3,100 (WB) WB-12 3,143 0.4% Yes Yes Immokalee Livingston Rd to 42.2 3,500 (EB) EB-44 2,916 1.3% No No Rd Project Immokalee 42.2 Project to 1-75 3,500 (EB) EB —18 2,890 0.5% No No Rd Immokalee 43.1 1-75 to Logan 3,500 (EB) EB-5 2,952 0.1% No No Rd Blvd Livingston North of 51.0 3,000 (NB) NB-7 1,393 0.2% No No Rd Immokalee Rd Livingston South of 52.0 3,100 (NB) NB —15 2,043 0.5% No No Rd Immokalee Rd Note(s): *Refer to Table 3 from this report. **2025 Projected Volume = 2025 background (refer to Table 4) + Project Volume added. Based on the information illustrated in Table 6, this project does not create any significant impacts to the area roadway network. Immokalee Road segment from Airport Road to Livingston Road is projected to exceed the adopted LOS standard under future 2025 background traffic conditions without project's traffic. There is adequate and sufficient roadway capacity on all other analyzed roadway segments to accommodate the proposed development. As illustrated in Collier County Land Development Code (LDC), Chapter 6.02.02 — M.2., once traffic from a development has been shown to be less than significant on any segment using Collier County TIS criterion, the development's impact is not required to be analyzed further on any additional segments. In agreement with the Collier County Growth Management Plan — Transportation Element — Policy 5.2, project traffic that is 1% or less of the adopted peak hour service volume represents a de minimis impact. With the exception of Immokalee Road segment from Livingston Road to project access, the projected traffic impact is de minimis on all analyzed roadway segments. With the exception of Immokalee Road segment from 1-75 to Logan Boulevard, the analyzed roadway segments are located within the County's designated Northwest Transportation Concurrency Management Area (TCMA). Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 10 Blue Coral Apartments — GMPA/PUDZ — TIS — May 2020 The TCMA's designations are provided in Policy 5.6 of the Transportation Element. In agreement with Policy 5.7 of the Transportation Element, the TCMA concurrency is measured on a system -wide basis such that each TCMA shall maintain 85% of its lane miles at or above the LOS standards. Based on the information contained in 2019 AUIR, the Northwest TCMA percent lane miles meeting standard is 97.1%. The Northwest TCMA map and the associated 2019 percent lanes miles meeting standard are illustrated in Appendix D. As illustrated in Policy 5.8(d) — Transportation Element, no impact will be de minimis if it exceeds the adopted LOS standard of any affected designated hurricane evacuation routes within a TCMA. Any impact to a hurricane evacuation route within a TCMA shall require a proportionate share congestion mitigation payment provided the remaining LOS requirements of the TCMA are maintained. It is noted that Immokalee Road is a designated hurricane evacuation route as depicted in Collier County Transportation Element — Map TR - 7. Site Access Turn Lane Analysis The project proposes to connect to Immokalee Road via a shared access with the adjacent development to the east, Germain Immokalee PUD. Residential traffic may access Juliet Boulevard via Useppa Way. In addition, the proposed development will provide one interconnection to the residential property to the west, Bermuda Palms. Refer to Appendix A: Project Master Site Plan. The project accesses are evaluated for turn lane warrants based on the Collier County Construction Standards Handbook for Work within the Right -Of -Way (Collier County Resolution No. 2016-136), Section III: (a) two-lane roadways — 40vph for right -turn lane/20vph for left -turn lane; (b) multi -lane divided roadways — right -turn lanes shall always be provided; and (c) when new median openings are permitted, they shall always include left -turn lanes. Required turn lane improvements are considered site related. As illustrated in the Collier County Construction Standards Handbook for Work within the Right -Of -Way, Section III, if existing County ROW is utilized for these improvements, compensating ROW must be provided. Turn lane lengths required at build -out conditions are analyzed based on the number of turning vehicles in an average one -minute period for right -turning movements, and two -minute period for left -turning movements, within the peak hour traffic. The minimum queue length is 25 feet and the queue/vehicle is 25 feet. Turning movement projections are illustrated in Appendix E. Immokalee Road (CR 846) is an east -west urban divided arterial roadway under Collier County jurisdiction, has a posted legal speed of 45 mph in the vicinity of the project and has an Access Management Classification of 3. Access management is the design of access between roadways and land development. It promotes the efficient and safe movement of people and goods by reducing conflicts on the roadway system. The Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 11 Blue Coral Apartments — GMPA/PUDZ — TIS — May 2020 latest adopted Access Management Policy for Collier County is depicted in Resolution No. 13-257. Consistent with a future Class 3 designation, the established access management criteria are as follow: 660 feet connection spacing; 660 feet directional median opening; 1,320 feet full median opening; and 2,640 feet (0.5 mi) signal spacing. Based on our review of the Master Plan, the proposed shared access point does not meet connection spacing standards for a Class 3 roadway. Given the unique site geometric conditions, the proposed shared access location is considered a reasonable compromise for a non -conforming connection location. Consistent with the adopted median opening spacing standards, a directional median opening is allowed at this location. For the purposes of this operational analysis, 2 configurations are considered for the proposed access: right-in/right-out and right-in/right-out/left-in. Based on FDOT Standard Plans Index 711-001 (sheet 11 of 13), design speed of 45 mph — urban conditions — the minimum turn lane length is 185 feet (which includes a 50 foot taper) plus required queue. The site operational analysis reflects projected AM and PM peak hour traffic. Since the proposed connection to Immokalee Road is a shared access with the property to the east, turning movement projections are provided for both developments (Blue Coral Apartments PUD and Germain Immokalee PUD), as illustrated in Appendix E. Scenario 1— Immokalee Road — Shared Access — Right-in/Right-out Connection A dedicated eastbound right -turn lane is warranted as the project meets the multi -lane criteria. The developments are expected to generate 58 vehicles per hour (vph) and 71 vph eastbound right - turning movements during the AM and PM peak hour, respectively. By rounding to the nearest 25 foot increment, at the minimum, the eastbound right -turn lane should be 210 feet long (185 foot deceleration lane with taper and 25 feet of storage). Scenario 2 — Immokalee Road — Shared Access — Right-in/Right-out/Left-in Connection If a directional median opening is allowed, a dedicated westbound left -turn lane is warranted as the project meets the multi -lane criteria. No changes to the eastbound right -turning traffic are expected under the Scenario 2 assumptions. As such, the minimum length for the eastbound right -turn lane should be 210 feet. The developments are expected to generate 27 vph and 28 vph westbound left -turning movements during the AM and PM peak hour, respectively. By rounding to the nearest 25 foot increment, at the minimum, the westbound left -turn lane should be 210 feet long (185 foot deceleration lane with taper and 25 feet of storage). A detailed evaluation of applicable access points will be performed at the time of a Site Development Plan or Development Order application to determine turn lane requirements, as more accurate parameters become available. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 12 Blue Coral Apartments — GMPA/PUDZ — TIS — May 2020 Improvement Analysis Based on the results illustrated within this traffic analysis, the proposed project is not a significant traffic generator for the roadway network. The segment of Immokalee Road from Airport Road to Livingston Road is projected to exceed the adopted LOS standard under future 2025 background traffic conditions without project's traffic. There is adequate and sufficient roadway capacity on all other analyzed roadway segments to accommodate the proposed development. With the exception of Immokalee Road segment from 1-75 to Logan Boulevard, the analyzed roadway segments are located within the County's designated Northwest TCMA. This report concluded that concurrency is maintained for the Northwest TCMA. A detailed evaluation of applicable access points will be performed at the time of a Site Development Plan or Development Order application to determine turn lane requirements, as more accurate parameters become available. The maximum total daily trip generation for the proposed development shall not exceed 119 two-way PM peak hour new trips based on the land use codes in the ITE Trip Generation Manual in effect at the time of application for SDP/SDPA or subdivision plat approval, as applicable. Mitigation of Impact The developer proposes to pay the appropriate Collier County Road Impact Fee as building permits are issued for the project, as applicable. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 13 Blue Coral Apartments — GMPA/PUDZ — TIS — May 2020 Appendix A: Project Master Site Plan Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 14 Blue Coral Apartments — GMPA/PUDZ — TIS — May 2020 Blue Coral Apartments PUD • �'OODODOO.•00000.'OO.� .: DOOOODOOOOODOO.'.O. a �•iiii'iiiiiiiiiiii•�� ►000000a . ►iiiiiii OOOOOOi •'i'iii'ii . • '000.0'.' j j 9-0 ► OVS Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 15 Blue Coral Apartments -GMA/uz-T&�-May 207 Germain lmmok mePUD �L & �§ J k § i ƒ §§§§ - \\§§ q 2 0 A e§§ )» e § ( / § | | LU 2 ;6 | ;K Z \\kI \ § — 0Mot e z ; _ _a_ m< \ .. . . . . \f� mC.R. y! , I,= --- . --�� -----------§;) USEP>_ § & \q ..,�,`...`1.,... ............. 2 2 \ N§ _�.r « --/ 2 ) . �\§} \. : . �i\ \ � � m■ / } � ; m ,« »i �, PL20190000451-Q/ / m Gm_NI_aa Ec o ,e8 Tebma Consulting Solutions, PA Page 1 16 Blue Coral Apartments — GMPA/PUDZ — TIS — May 2020 Appendix B: Initial Meeting Checklist (Methodology Meeting) Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 17 Blue Coral Apartments — GMPA/PUDZ — TIS — May 2020 INITIAL MEETING CHECKLIST Suggestion: Use this Appendix as a worksheet to ensure that no important elements are overlooked. Cross out the items that do not apply, or N/A (not applicable). Date: March 13, 2020 Time: N/A Location: N/A — Via Email People Attending: Name, Organization, and Telephone Numbers 1) Michael Sawyer, Collier County Growth Management Division 2) Norman Trebilcock, TCS 3) Ciprian Malaescu, TCS Studv Preparer: Preparer's Name and Title: Norman Trebilcock, AICP, PE Organization: Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA Address & Telephone Number: 2800 Davis Boulevard, Suite 200, Naples, FL 34104, A 239-566-9551 Reviewer(s)• Reviewer's Name & Title: Michael Sawyer, Project Manager Collier County Transportation Planning Department Organization & Telephone Number: 239-252-2926 Applicant: Applicant's Name: Capital Investment Group, Inc. Address: 226 East 8'h St. Cincinnati. OH 45202 Telephone Number: 513-246-1985 Proposed Development: Name: Coral Blue Apartments — Growth Management Plan Amendment (GMPA) and the associated Planned Unit Development Rezone (PUDZ) Location: On the south side of Immokalee Road (CR 846), between Livingston Rd (CR 881) and I-75 (refer to Figure 1) _ Land Use Type: Residential — Multifamily ITE Code #: LUC 221 — Multifamily Housing (Mid -Rise) Description: The property is approximately 9.35 ac and it is currently vacant land. The proposed GMPA/PUDZ would allow for the development of up to 280 multifamily dwelling units. Project will connect to Immokalee Rd via a connection shared with the adjacent development to the east. In addition, development will provide interconnects to the commercial site to the east and to the residential property (Bermuda Palms) to the west. As such, generated traffic may access Juliet Blvd via Useppa WU. Page 1 of 6 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 18 Blue Coral Apartments — GMPA/PUDZ — TIS — May 2020 Figure 1 — Project Location flap 0� Project • , Q.. _ , = Go gle Map data 02020 1000 tt Zoning Existing: Agricultural (A), future PUD application Comprehensive plan recommendation: GMPA Requested: approval for new development - Findings of the Preliminary Study: Study type: Since projected net external AM or PM proiect traffic is greater than 100 two-way peak hour trips, this study qualifies for a Maior TIS — significant roadway and/or operational impacts. Proposed TIS will include trip generation, traffic distribution and assignments, significance test (based on 2%/2%/3% criterion). Trip Generation — based on Collier County Traffic Impact Study Guidelines and Procedures, ITE Trip Generation Manual. loth Edition and ITE Trip Generation Handbook, 3rd Edition. In agreement with ITE procedures and Collier County TIS guidelines, internal capture and pass -by traffic are not considered. The TIS will determine if there is consistency with the Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element. The report will provide existing LOS and document the impact the proposed change will have on designated arterial and collector roads. Roadway concurrence analysis — based on estimated net external PM peak hour traffic. The TIS shall be consistent with Collier County TIS Guidelines and Procedures. Most of the analyzed roadway segments are located within the County's designated Northwest Transportation Concurrency Management Areas (TCMAs). Page 2 of 6 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 19 Blue Coral Apartments — GMPA/PUDZ — TIS — May 2020 The TCMA's designation is provided in Policy 5.4 and 5.6 of the Transportation Element — Collier County Growth Management Plan (GMP). To maintain concurrency. TCMA shall maintain 85% of its lane miles at or above the adopted LOS standard. Site Access — The applicant proposes one shared access connection on Immokalee Road — review compliance with adopted Collier County Access Management Policy. Immokalee Road — segment from Livingston Road to I-75 — Access Management Class 3: Posted Speed — 45 mph: Design Speed — 45 mph. Operational site access — turn lane analysis is based on proposed protect build -out conditions AM -PM peak hour generated traffic — to include proiected traffic from the Property to the east (up to 80,000 sf automobile dealership). Study Tyne: if not net increase, operational study) Small Scale TIS ❑ Minor TIS ❑ Maior TIS Study Area: Boundaries: Adjacent Street —Immokalee Road Additional intersections to be analyzed: N/A Build Out Year: 2025 Planning Horizon Year: 2025 Analysis Time Period(s): Concurrency—PM Peak Hour; Operational—AM/PM Peak Hour Future Off -Site Developments: N/A Source of Trip Generation Rates: ITE Trip Generation Manual, 10a` Edition, ITE Handbook 3`d Edition Reductions in Trin Generation Rates: None: N/A Pass -by trips: N/A Internal trips: N/A Transit use: N/A Other: N/A Horizon Year Roadway Network Improvements: 2025 Methodoloev & Assumptions: Non -site traffic estimates: Collier Countv traffic counts and 2019 AUIR Site -trip generation: OTISS — ITE 10 h Edition Trip distribution method: Engineer's Estimate - refer to Figure 2 Traffic assignment method: project trip generation with background and growth Traffic growth rate: historical growth rate or 2% minimum Turning movements: Ingress Traffic — 60% from Immokalee Rd via proposed shared access and 40% via east interconnection — Useppa Wax Page 3 of 6 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 120 Blue Coral Apartments — GMPA/PUDZ — TIS — May 2020 Figure 2 — Project Trip Distribution by Percentage a ° O C, f O ` 2 Page 4 of G Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 21 Blue Coral Apartments — GMPA/PUDZ — TIS — May 2020 Special Features: from preliminary study or prior experience) Accidents locations: N/A Sight distance: N/A Queuing: N/A Access location & configuration: N/A Traffic control: MUTCD Signal system location & progression needs: N/A On -site parking needs: N/A Data Sources: CC 2019 AUIR; CC Traffic Counts Base maps: N/A Prior study reports: N/A Access policy and jurisdiction: N/A Review process: N/A Requirements: N/A Miscellaneous: N/A Small Scale Study — No Fee Minor Study - $750.00 Major Study - $1,500.00 X Methodology Fee $500 X Includes 0 intersections Additional Intersections - $500.00 each All fees will be agreed to during the Methodology meeting and must be paid to Transportation prior to our sign -off on the application. --------------- SIGNATURES Norwt.aw TrebUrock Study Preparer—Norman Trebilcock Reviewer(s) Applicant Page 5 of 6 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 122 Blue Coral Apartments — GMPA/PUDZ — TIS — May 2020 Collier County Traffic Impact Study Review Fee Schedule Fees will be paid incrementally as the development proceeds: Methodology Review, Analysis Review, and Sufficiency Reviews. Fees for additional meetings or other optional services are also provided below. Methodology Review - $500 Fee Methodology Review includes review of a submitted methodology statement, including review of submitted trip generation estimate(s), distribution, assignment, and review of a "Small Scale Study" determination, written approval/comments on a proposed methodology statement, and written confirmation of a re -submitted, amended methodology statement, and one meeting in Collier County, if needed. "Small Scale Study" Review - No Additional Fee (Includes one sufficiency review) Upon approval of the methodology review, the applicant may submit the study. The review includes: a concurrency determination, site access inspection and confirmation of the study compliance with trip generation, distribution and maximum threshold compliance. "Minor Study Review" - $750 Fee (Includes one sufficiency review) Review of the submitted traffic analysis includes: optional field visit to site, confirmation of trip generation, distribution, and assignment, concurrency determination, confirmation of committed improvements, review of traffic volume data collected/assembled, review of off -site improvements within the right-of-way, review of site access and circulation, and preparation and review of "sufficiency" comments/questions. "Major Study Review" - $1,500 Fee (Includes two intersection analysis and two sufficiency reviews Review of the submitted traffic analysis includes: field visit to site, confirmation of trip generation, special trip generation and/or trip length study, distribution and assignment, concurrency determination, confirmation of committed improvements, review of traffic volume data collected/assembled, review of traffic growth analysis, review of off -site roadway operations and capacity analysis, review of site access and circulation, neighborhood traffic intrusion issues, any necessary improvement proposals and associated cost estimates, and preparation and review of up to two rounds of "sufficiency" comments/questions and/or recommended conditions of approval. "Additional intersection Review" - $500 Fee The review of additional intersections shall include the same parameters as outlined in the `Major Study Review" and shall apply to each intersection above the first two intersections included in the "Major Study Review" "Additional Sufficiency Reviews" - $500 Fee Additional sufficiency reviews beyond those initially included in the appropriate study shall require the additional Fee prior to the completion of the review. Page 6 of 6 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 123 Blue Coral Apartments — GMPA/PUDZ — TIS — May 2020 Appendix C: ITE Trip Generation Calculations and Land Use Code Descriptions Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 24 Blue Coral Apartments — GMPA/PUDZ — TIS — May 2020 Blue Coral Apartments PUD Land Use: 221 Multifamily Housing (Mid -Rise) Description Mid -rise multifamily housing includes apartments, townhouses, and condominiums located within the same building with at least three other dwelling units and that have between three and 10 levels (floors). Multifamily housing (low-rise) (Land Use 220), multifamily housing (high-rise) (Land Use 222), off -campus student apartment (Land Use 225), and mid -rise residential with 1 st-floor commercial (Land Use 231) are related land uses. Additional Data In prior editions of Trip Generation Manual, the mid -rise multifamily housing sites were further divided into rental and condominium categories. An investigation of vehicle trip data found no clear differences in trip making patterns between the rental and condominium sites within the ITE database. As more data are compiled for future editions, this land use classification can be reinvestigated. For the six sites for which both the number of residents and the number of occupied dwelling units were available, there were an average of 2.46 residents per occupied dwelling unit. For the five sites for which the numbers of both total dwelling units and occupied dwelling units were available, an average of 95.7 percent of the total dwelling units were occupied. Time -of -day distribution data for this land use are presented in Appendix A. For the eight general urban/suburban sites with data, the overall highest vehicle volumes during the AM and PM on a weekday were counted between 7:00 and 8:00 a.m. and 4:45 and 5:45 p.m., respectively. For the four dense multi -use urban sites with 24-hour count data, the overall highest vehicle volumes during the AM and PM on a weekday were counted between 7:15 and 8:15 a.m. and 4:15 and 5:15 p.m., respectively. For the three center city core sites with 24-hour count data, the overall highest vehicle volumes during the AM and PM on a weekday were counted between 6:45 and 7:45 a.m. and 5:00 and 6:00 p.m., respectively. For the six sites for which data were provided for both occupied dwelling units and residents, there was an average of 2.46 residents per occupied dwelling unit. For the five sites for which data were provided for both occupied dwelling units and total dwelling units, an average of 95.7 percent of the units were occupied. The average numbers of person trips per vehicle trip at the five center city core sites at which both person trip and vehicle trip data were collected were as follows: • 1.84 during Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, one hour between 7 and 9 a.m. • 1.94 during Weekday, AM Peak Hour of Generator • 2.07 during Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, one hour between 4 and 6 p.m. • 2.59 during Weekday, PM Peak Hour of Generator "Fi Trip Generation Manual 10th Edition • Volume 2: Data • Residential (Land Uses 200-299) 71 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 125 Blue Coral Apartments - GMPA/PUDZ - TIS - May 2020 The average numbers of person trips per vehicle trip at the 32 dense multi -use urban sites at which both person trip and vehicle trip data were collected were as follows: • 1.90 during Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, one hour between 7 and 9 a.m. • 1.90 during Weekday, AM Peak Hour of Generator • 2.00 during Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, one hour between 4 and 6 p.m. • 2.08 during Weekday, PM Peak Hour of Generator The average numbers of person trips per vehicle trip at the 13 general urban/suburban sites at which both person trip and vehicle trip data were collected were as follows: • 1.56 during Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, one hour between 7 and 9 a.m. • 1.88 during Weekday, AM Peak Hour of Generator • 1.70 during Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, one hour between 4 and 6 p.m. • 2.07 during Weekday, PM Peak Hour of Generator The sites were surveyed in the 1980s, the 1990s, the 2000s, and the 2010s in Alberta (CAN), British Columbia (CAN), California, Delaware, District of Columbia, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, New Hampshire, New Jersey, Ontario, Oregon, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Utah, Virginia, and Wisconsin. Source Numbers 168, 188, 204, 305, 306, 321, 357, 390, 436, 525, 530, 579, 638, 818, 857, 866, 901, 904, 910, 912, 918, 934, 936, 939, 944, 947, 948, 949, 959, 963, 964, 966, 967, 969, 970 72 Trip Generation Manual 10th Edition • Volume 2: Data • Residential (Land Uses 200-299) Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 126 Blue Coral Apartments — GMPA/PUDZ — TIS — May 2020 Project Information Project Name: 5000 Immokalee Rd Development Date: 3/13/2020 Edition: Trip Gen Manual, loth Ed Land Use Size Daily AM Peak PM Peak Entry Exit Entry Exit Entry Exit 221 - Multifamily Housing (Mid -Rise) (General Urban/Suburban) 280 Dwelling Units 762 762 24 70 73 46 Reduction 0 0 0 0 0 0 Internal 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass -by 0 0 0 0 0 0 Non -pass -by 762 762 24 70 73 46 Total 762 762 24 70 73 46 Total Reduction 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Internal 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Pass -by 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Non -pass -by 762 762 24 70 73 46 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 27 Blue Coral Apartments — GMPA/PUDZ — TIS — May 2020 PERIOD SETTING Analysis Name: Daily Project Name: 5000 Immokalee Rd No: Development Date: 3/13/2020 City: State/Province: Zip/Postal Code: Country: Client Name: Analyst's Name: Edition: Trip Gen Manual, 10th Ed Land Use Independent Variable Size Time Period Method Entry Exit Total 221 - Multifamily Dwelling Units 280 Weekday Best Fit (LIN) 762 762 1524 Housing (Mid -Rise) T = 5.45 (X)+-1.75 50% 50% (General Urban/Suburban) TRAFFIC REDUCTIONS Land Use Rimed ctlon Adjusted Entry Exit Reduction Adjusted Exit 221 - Multifamily Housing (Mid -Rise) 0 % 762 0 % 762 EXTERNAL TRIPS Land Use External �' Pass Trips P Pass -by Trips P Non -pass -by Trips 221 - Multifamily Housing (Mid -Rise) 1524 0 0 1524 ITE DEVIATION DETAILS Weekday Landuse No deviations from ITE. Methods No deviations from ITE. External Trips 221 - Multifamily Housing (Mid -Rise) (General Urban/Suburban) ITE does not recommend a particular pass -by% for this case. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 128 Blue Coral Apartments — GMPA/PUDZ — TIS — May 2020 Total Entering 762 Total Exiling 762 Total Entering Reduction 0 Total Exiting Reduction 0 Total Entering Internal Capture Reduction 0 Total Exiling Internal Capture Reduction 0 Total Entering Pass -by Reduction 0 Total Exiling Pass -by Reduction 0 Total Entering Non -Pass -by Trips 762 Total Exiting Non -Pass -by Trips 762 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 129 Blue Coral Apartments — GMPA/PUDZ — TIS — May 2020 PERIOD SETTING Analysis Name: AM Peak Hour Project Name : 5000 Immokalee Rd No: Development Date: 3/13/2020 City: State/Province: Zip/Postal Code: Country: Client Name: Analyst's Name: Edition: Land Use Independent Size Time Period Method Variable 221 - Multifamily Dwelling Units 280 Weekday, Peak Best Fit (LOG) Housing (Mid -Rise) Hour of Adjacent Ln(T) = 0.98Ln(X) (General Street Traffic, +-0.98 Urban/Suburban) One Hour Between 7 and 9 a.m. TRAFFIC REDUCTIONS Land Use Entry Reduction 221 - Multifamily Housing (Mid -Rise) 0 % Land Use 221 - Multifamily Housing (Mid -Rise) Trip Gen Manual, 10th Ed Entry Exit Total 24 70 94 26% 74% Adjusted Entry Exit Reduction Adjusted Exit 24 0 % 70 EXTERNAL TRIPS External Trips Pass -by% Pass -by Trips Non -pass -by Trips 94 0 0 94 ITE DEVIATION DETAILS Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 7 and 9 a.m. Landuse No deviations from ITE. Methods No deviations from ITE. External Trips 221 - Multifamily Housing (Mid -Rise) (General Urban/Suburban) ITE does not recommend a particular pass -by°% for this case. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 130 Blue Coral Apartments — GMPA/PUDZ — TIS — May 2020 Total Entering Total Exiling Total Entering Reduction Total Exiting Reduction Total Entering Internal Capture Reduction Total Exiling Internal Capture Reduction Total Entering Pass -by Reduction Total Exiling Pass -by Reduction Total Entering Non -Pass -by Trips Total Exiting Non -Pass -by Trips 24 70 24 70 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 131 Blue Coral Apartments — GMPA/PUDZ — TIS — May 2020 PERIOD SETTING Analysis Name: PM Peak Hour Project Name : 5000 Immokalee Rd No: Development Date: 3/13/2020 City: State/Province: Zip/Postal Code: Country: Client Name: Analyst's Name: Edition: Land Use Independent Size Time Period Method Variable 221 - Multifamily Dwelling Units 280 Weekday, Peak Best Fit (LOG) Housing (Mid -Rise) Hour of Adjacent Ln(T) = 0.96Ln(X) (General Street Traffic, +-0.63 Urban/Suburban) One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m. TRAFFIC REDUCTIONS Land Use Entry Reduction 221 - Multifamily Housing (Mid -Rise) 0 % Land Use 221 - Multifamily Housing (Mid -Rise) Trip Gen Manual, 10th Ed Entry Exit Total 73 46 119 61 % 39% Adjusted Entry Exit Reduction Adjusted Exit 73 0 % 46 EXTERNAL TRIPS External Trips Pass -by% Pass -by Trips Non -pass -by Trips 119 0 0 119 ITE DEVIATION DETAILS Weekday, Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic, One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m. Landuse No deviations from ITE. Methods No deviations from ITE. External Trips 221 - Multifamily Housing (Mid -Rise) (General Urban/Suburban) ITE does not recommend a particular pass -by°% for this case. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 132 Blue Coral Apartments — GMPA/PUDZ — TIS — May 2020 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 133 Blue Coral Apartments - GMPA/PUDZ - TIS - May 2020 Germain Immokalee PUD Land Use: 840 Automobile Sales (New) Description A new automobile sales dealership is typically located along a major arterial street characterized by abundant commercial development. The sale or leasing of new cars is the primary business at these facilities; however, automobile services, parts sales, and used car sales may also be available. Some dealerships also include leasing options, truck sales, and servicing. Automobile sales (used) (Land Use 841) and recreational vehicle sales (Land Use 842) are related uses. Additional Data Time -of -day distribution data for this land use are presented in Appendix A. For the six general urban/suburban sites with data, the overall highest vehicle volumes during the AM and PM on a weekday were counted between 11:15 a.m. and 12:15 p.m. and 1:45 and 2:45 p.m., respectively. The sites were surveyed in the 1980s, the 1990s, the 2000s, and the 2010s in Alberta (CAN), California, Delaware, Florida, Georgia, Indiana, New York, North Carolina, Oregon, Texas, Vermont, and Virginia. Source Numbers 260, 271, 280, 328, 414, 424, 427, 438, 440, 507, 571, 583, 612, 715, 728, 880, 881, 936, 974, 975 172 Trip Generation Manual 10th Edition • Volume 2: Data • Retail (Land Uses 800-899) ,{`_ Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 134 Blue Coral Apartments — GMPA/PUDZ — TIS — May 2020 Project Information Project Name: Germain Immokalee PUD No: Date: 3/20/2020 Edition: Trip Gen Manual, 10th Ed Land Use Size Weekday AM Peak PM Peak Entry Exit Entry Exit Entry Exit 840 - Automobile Sales (New) (General Urban/Suburban) 80 1000 Sq. Ft. GFA 1114 1113 110 40 66 100 Reduction 0 0 0 0 0 0 Internal 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass -by 0 0 0 0 0 0 Non -pass -by 1114 1113 110 40 66 100 Total 1114 1113 110 40 66 100 Total Reduction 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Internal 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total Pass -by 0 0 0 0 Total Non -pass -by 1114 1113 110 4 LJ 100 PERIOD SETTING ✓ DATA PROVIDED BY ITE Specify the Independent Variable, Time Period, and Calculation Method to be used in the calculation of the number of Trips generated in the analysis_ To record any notes, click , Add Notes above. PROJECT NAME: GERMAIN IMMOKALEE ROAD ANALYSIS NAME: l Weekday INDEPENDENT S17F TIME PERIOD METHOD ENTRY EXIT TOTAI VARIABLE 840 - Automobile Sales (New) 1000 Sq. Ft GFA • 0(0) General Weekday Average • Q714 1113 2227 Urban/Suburban 27.0"4 (0) indicates size out of range. Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 35 Blue Coral Apartments - GMPA/PUDZ - TIS - May 2020 PERIOD SETTING V DATA PROVIDED BY ITE Specify the Independent Variable, Time Period, and Calculation Method to be used in the calculation of the number of Trips generated in the analysis. To record any notes, click - Add Notes above. PROJECT NAME: GERMAIN IMMOKALEE ROAD ANALYSIS NAME: AM Peak Hour INDEPENDENT ^^Ir USE VARIABLE SIZE LOC TInN TIME PERIOD METHOD ENTRY EXIT TOTAL_ 840 - Automobile Sales (New) 1000 Sq. Ft GFA • BO Urban/Subulrban weekday, Peak HOu Average • i.6i q10 40 150 PERIOD SETTING DATA PROVIDED BY ITE Specify the Independent Variable, Time Period, and Calculation Method to be used in the calculation of the number of Trips generated in the analysis. To record any notes, click Add Notes above. PROJECT NAME: GERMAIN IMMOKALEE ROAD ANALYSIS NAME: pM Peak Hou, _ INDEPENDENT VARIABLE 840 -Automobile Sales (New) 1000 Sq. Ft GFA S17� TIME PERIOD METHOD • 80 General Weekday, Peak Hou Best FR (LIN) • �66 Urban/Suburban T= 1,8W+21.6 100 166 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 36 Blue Coral Apartments — GMPA/PUDZ — TIS — May 2020 Appendix D: Collier County Northwest TCMA Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 1 37 Blue Coral Apartments - GMPA/PUDZ - TIS - May 2020 I � � I w� - _ I 0 I ZI o w a LLI og l Ea OI€ U w --. N OAIB NVO01 $ W I r � 5, I I � — - - m ' ca V LLI lY v- (38 NOISONIAII 7 Oa JNI-lind 12iOd2ilbd i� =O 1 0 U w, 0 w O W: e4 Ui oa a W) O MVIW-31J13I0000 — Q O ++ -- NI2ilIWt/IN to z a w 0 w +•+ C Z ¢ _ w 3� ad 1I16a3oNHn S O a Z w 7 Ql Q H Iz O a m zo ULFF MEX�r'O O N s Wa O � Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 138 Blue Coral Apartments -GMA/uz-T&�-May 207 fs {{ w v @e@Saee,22: §0 2 ! .,,,,,,,,,,,=m,. § llw v v IT M $0: !� [§§[§§§§/\/§[2!| !=f)l2�l,lf§\§. 10 � �«1 {�\�0�7�\ �kkf` » ! , , !*o ��«`!<«;«! , �a ,, � \�§kJ/l�e ��kktkk. £-! M )kk)k)))!#! ))` l±;k#�®«„ ;JQQ:§§ / %#;kk )kkk�<< .61-AMIM !!, �eF_F_ J k§§c;Jk| Tebma Consulting Solutions, PA Page 139 Blue Coral Apartments — GMPA/PUDZ — TIS — May 2020 Appendix E: Turning Movements Exhibits Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 140 Blue Coral Apartments — GMPA/PUDZ — TIS — May 2020 �Q m m� O�_ 11 - y E c E I® E • p E 0. O ZZ _ 3 N v`� o U •� O r/uJ Z� O QU CB o (> rn Java BiYa PNB PUP,15 � ut � ® 1IC90(- o� a I CD-y+g--------- b 0 0 0 ■ O ayeJ siNB BNI« LnFe Di 0 (0.......... . ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ . ■ ■ m ✓, SnnJra B.,Y n. U LU wi�as«.v cir Q d Q u E - d F- w LW =O a N � �c _ N Q= 3 bvin0ton Rd Livingston Rd Lrvingsmn Y Llvingston Rd O O 0 (D a E d Q E wn _ ,eM aware. m of O C C Q Q U C9 pay n u O Ei u E 62 A°tm Gadens W°Y Avten G§ Anon Gr A. -Dr Asian Or Cm Cir Z O 0 N 0 N O N co cu a ca 2 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 141 Blue Coral Apartments — GMPA/PUDZ — TIS — May 2020 �Q m mNO Om - a cd n o y E a T 2 (� ® 0 IB ®O o) U <C o N ILO O Y C O N �y E = \ Q > c6 0 ZZ `o C a ca vO 3 c- O •� � LL v`� U Cp o CL) O 0^` O W V — LL mhF © �O E® ��N II II c4 vN E O; N V � -Inn i�i r,� sunny ema + + M1MB MIME JUNa ewa VN9 anm.s 0 O) N ©� Z ,D OMV' q, �NYa U U o� N ch ¢ a I ya m N o. I o' a CO �+ o LO +yeJ aiNB DWln Lnke II II v r— Gan6n nYo U 'IT N # © T L _LU wmasonN ci+ Q d � Q _ - - QQ = O co co�E �Q W d U U D a E� Lrv,ngs;nl Q d � O Q= 3 LrvinOM Rd Livingston Rd Gvingsm� � Y O 0 -. O O a E Q E O C + O N U C9 _ Oa~ n u J v x� as y O or"' E u E 6i Aslan G Corey Aam De Gi+ A¢Im Gaanns WeY Aam Dr Avten G§ Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 142 Blue Coral Apartments — GMPA/PUDZ — TIS — May 2020 ,^^ '(n'^ VI cn � U C� C 1 0 ID ®O N C c6 w O •L � w y--r `ow ro © E •� � L - - LL <" ©� N mNF © E® _ � .O L 0>a Ocu E LL L t O N N luliat Gird s,r:ma xira uae �d��„r ?D ewoY ooue�a+�a DND I—M rG s6u�+g5,b O O `sMr Ur a N OOU C� II�e w Yma u- i Vo - IF O _ I I r n ■ o O �'m„ai�e emits w.w. o, o (0 ti ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■Ir m n„, s.ntre oya � U 5 _ # �z zuUi a LU wi�aso�p cir Q d Q u E - d F- = m LW =O a N � �c _ N Q = 3 LrvinOM Rd Livingston Rd Lrvingsmn Y 3 Lvingston Rd O O 0 (D a d Q E jwn � — .eM aware. m of O C Q Q U C9 pay n u Oa N s,cmi. Lo a F u E A¢tm Gaaens WeY Avten G§ Aelan G Ae1an De Acton Dr cm cir O O N O N O N CO cu a ca 2 Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 143 Blue Coral Apartments — GMPA/PUDZ — TIS — May 2020 N "O CA n co 0 CAcq N N C2 O E E v' s.r;ma BI N co + + II II N ('h N ;a o© LO 'IT �.w.. o. C� C� N m m e + + U U a a QColo m QQ�xol 00 { Qa I y' — I. ....................M r� 00 ■ o, Lr) am�si�e ewM w.w. C� C9 z cn a + + - W wmasmq ci. Q r V 'IT(DUas S U d Q -__ m i Q Q m m �-' Q >rn E N U U �a 3 Livingston Rd Livingston Rd 9 ovingstni" .- Y Q (Id= w nys O U Q E _ Q E ® u >_ C m o E O N U CD m U U E A.. team: way Ae..n G Aa.- Dr A.ton m cm.r d. O O N O CV O (714 CO a m J Trebilcock Consulting Solutions, PA P a g e 144 Site Layout nutfa I I c L11 CORA[ U.J,f�) BLUE Blue Coral Stormwater Plan (Pre -Site Development Plan) North Side The existing site layout will accommodate the existing 50' and 10' drainage, utility and maintenance easements to the North of the development along Immokalee road. Currently the 50' easement made up of the Immokalee Road East bound travel lanes. The remaining 10' easement to the south of that contains a stormwater swale. The future plan will add a right -in right out turn lane and will accommodate and additional 10' easement on the property. Giving the county a full 70' on the North side of the property. West and East The west and east sides of the property abut or will abut adjacent development. Each of those developments will have a landscape buffer and so will this subject property, the space in between the two berms will be directed to flow to the South into the native area which will be consistent with natural flow patterns. If needed ditch bottom inlets will be added to adequately provide positive drainage for the property boundaries. South Side The Southern side of the property will encompass the required native area, this will also be the proposed outfall for the project. The outfall will connect in with the existing preserves of the other adjacent properties. Final outfall will be routed to the west, the south into the Livingston Road swale. Stormwater modeling and routings will be performed in order to receive a SFWMD ERP permit and will consistent with District standards. �4 ro vo , ■uur fcoo m iiiirAGNQ;m o o ■��Y to O ■umBAR _ 3 .p r °'—o o 5tm a ■uur• 17T. ■t•tt•t•t•Y j p :o 1—BRUGE, 1NC.> m ; m LEGEND Oo D 7400 Trull Blvd., sulre Ies, Fl aal oep PH: (239)597-3111 99)566-22031-10 o w -BUILDING - - - - - PROPERTY LINE DI='lra 'p = �7y 33 - - - - - - - BUFFER BOUNDARY LINE zp� v v, - ACCESSORY/POOL/AMENITY A SCALE: 1" = 150' 1 D m TRACT LINE 10 o PARKING GARAGE m p 40-0. SITE ACCESS LOCATION PARKING AREA o aom c Or PRESERVATION AREA o NZa cv pyA A E m; O >D D NO- � -ZO v ODZ z� N 0 I O m ,Z>° I WO ran 2 I,Mp,Qovl ONDIHVd 11VHc V PROPERTY LINE 10' WIDE''dTb TYPE"A"* It\I « ZCID (Q I . fl` t Efe 'pkp_ I « « « « « « «I �VfNSSTON E f LAKES E E t t E f f t (MULTI -FAMILY I «I « PR E E 18 ON AN 1 «I«\E a am 0 1 � 1tE IE \1 O « Z w m ¢ 4 t «�D m CONCEPTUAL a G `I E « , « D f c76UILDING tl E NVELOPE 0 mkt roam i to I * 10' Which shaII have no site alteration, placement of fill, grading, plant Iteration or removal, or similar activity abutting the pr serve. El U ox CPUD mA GERMAIN oy IMMOKALEE a x0 D A2 Z v m A MASTEI PLAN (EXHIBIT C) Oy BLUE CORAL APARTMENT RE ENTIAL PLA ED UNIT DEVEIQPMEI CA LAND USE SUMMAR 0° _ &PILANG mg 1.96 ACRES C1A,SO AR+G 0.70 rk ES 2.60 ACRES KTN d� ,o 1.14 &jkk�ES 0.45 RCRES 'v B FFERS 1.32 9:RESf) PRESERVE 1.18 AtE� t7 TOTAL 9.35 AC cn Ep- 3 I rn I NATIVE VEGETATION PRESERVE M REQUIRED: 15% F NATIVE VEG m TAN CRIES x 0.15= L18mCRE5 PR D if RES I � I I I I I FUTURE ACCESS I (SUBJECT TO NEIGHBOR APPROVAL) I 1 102•4811 M „£4,9020 N II 19g - I LA � 1 1 I f VIDE TYPE „p" OFER E CONCEPTUA& BUILDING o ENVELOPE / Sll 3 „81,&Z0 S FUTURE ACCESS (SUBJECT TO NEIGHBOR APPROVAL) fflpl� • I SHARED ACCESS AT EASTERN PROPERTY LINE I I I i _1 � Jdjl I5' FUTU E .. C. $4SEMEt` I 11511 1 10' C.C. EikSEMENT 0C. EASEMEI I III 1 to I IIAI I 1 m �I I m I C 1 1 I 3�- p li p� OA1 ABB PN: Master I I May, 2C S JT Rev 2 1 .S . I' 1 ` JVIM' - o . 7 a MW Y •R• A �l Z ! A $ x• 1 tt �. F ✓ k w { a T G' a �1. a �{ Js' f: Y' x t A' R \ V r r- r: r z iri' bxt w 1 .E •' .._+,./tf! �'�� '.".��'E�i..'lr�rlF1��_ �r:'�'•>r .Ie�124t�.. ��`1�� G: I �I 1 17 3 3 Q. E` s,• 1, H pp J F t r v a II • { J i Y s- :J ir _T1 y _ Y NMI► i Ni r FW- C ► 6. t e .�_,,_]� rF, AP 14 71 LIM V T 1. .1ela a,., [ems"' ,'1 J1 i , 4•. AV IN i ♦ s yam.. )_ � }��• y' _. S '♦ V R_"T '\fie .'Ri'' yl` �.', \ � 1� _ 1 r.. I 1r� ,� ►. y — �,.-• mil`• ` s'� I I ► � � �,� 1 • Professional Engineers, Planners, Surveyors & Landscape Architects � WOe s II e, II I r v C , I I r ♦ Q� • =� • f , I �• 0 • h Jrl ' �� I' r 1L � - II � ► i, ` 1 I tl �r �� 4.56 r' 45 1 t F4 ■�I � �IfY.� (� IJ/ '� ``` � I' � LIB t\ � / 1 �! II ;I;f I' .-�`, ► ■ Ir i' Wit„ : ,•. T 'IJ-= \ .t� B I Y 4 1. a/ J K �y } 1- '•5 \\ �� t�"y'.''iA � v'�,d� __� �:..zstli �� r •�r •.:7W'i,.e ui'.''+_'"F-1,1 4-0 0 a Mj It M c r r FF•� tr`� i rr-T t tl�' r <; ' EXHIBIT V.E.1 & V.E.3 Blue Coral Apartments— Subdistrict Public Facilities Report The proposed Subdistrict seeks to satisfy the need for an additional residential area in order to keep up with the increasing business growth in Collier County. This property presents itself as an ideal location due to its close proximity to surrounding goods and services, 1-75, and a 6-lane divided road that is also used as an emergency evacuation route. The site will provide a total of 280 units, in a variety of layouts ranging from studio to 3-bed/2-bath apartments. The total population that the residential site will serve is based on the countywide average occupancy of 2.5 people per dwelling unit, resulting in additional housing for 700 residents in Collier County. Collier County Public Utilities will provide water service for potable and fire protection needs as well as wastewater service. The subject property is within the North Wastewater Service Area. The county has sufficient treatment capacity to provide water and sewer service. For wastewater, the permitted treatment capacity is 26.35 MGD while the required treatment capacity is 21.23 MGD. The additional peak demand required by Immokalee Road Apartments (Blue Coral Apartments) is 0.1 1 MGD, resulting in an increase of required treatment capacity to 21.34 MGD. For potable water, the permitted capacity is 52.75 MGD while the required treatment capacity is 42.5 MGD. The peak demand required from the Blue Coral Apartments is 0.14 MGD, increasing the water treatment requirement to 42.64 MGD. According to the Collier County 2019 Annual Update and Inventory Report (AUIR), currently there is an existing landfill capacity of 13,547,175 tons, and a ten-year landfill capacity requirement of 2,675,006 tons. The estimated life of the landfill is 42 years. This is adequate to accommodate the additional solid waste stream generated by the proposed project. On -site Stormwater pre-treatment water quality and quantity will comply with SFWMD requirements. Stormwater for the proposed apartment complex will be stored in and under the pavement with full water quality and quantity treatment provided to discharge to the preserve on the southern portion of the site. The preserve will be used to convey the runoff to flow towards Livingston Road, ultimately flowing into the Airport Road canal in accordance with a natural flow way system dictated by SFWMD on adjoining properties. State and County standards for off -site discharges will be met, resulting in no adverse impacts to the stormwater management (drainage) level of service. The adopted level of service for schools is based upon permanent FISH capacity: 100% for high school Concurrency Service Areas (CSAs); 95% for elementaryCSAs; and 95% for middle school CSAs. The subject site is within zone E8, Northwest Area 2 CSA for elementary schools, zone M4 Northwest Area CSA for middle schools, and zone H4, Northwest Area CSA for high schools. The E8 CSA includes two elementary schools, Laurel oak and Veterans Memorial. They have a combined FISH capacity of 1,639 students, a 201 8/2019 peak enrollment of 1,790 students, and a projected 2023/202A enrollment of 1,861 (1 14% capacity). According to the Collier County Public Schools CIP, enrollment at Laurel Oak Elementary School is being monitored. Laurel Oak will continue to provide temporary alternatives to address the overcrowding prior to providing permanent relief in 2023. The H4 and M4 CSAs include Barron Collier and Gulf Coast High Schools, and North Naples, Oakridge, and Pine Ridge Middle Schools. The high schools have a combined FISH capacity of 5,297 students, a 201 8/2019 peak enrollment of 4,090 students, and a projected 2023/2024 enrollment 4,784 students (90% capacity). Starting in 2023, a new high school will open and provide permanent relief for Naples and Golden Estates area high schools. The middle schools have a combined FISH capacity of 3,361 students, a 2018/2019 peak enrollment of 3,126 students, and a projected 2023/2024 enrollment of 3220 students (96% capacity). According to Collier County Public schools CIP, enrollment at Oak Ridge Middle School and Gulf Coast high School is being monitored. Gulf Coast High School added six additional portables in 2018, and further temporary alternatives to address overcrowding will be provided until the opening of the new high school. According to the Collier County 2019 AUIR, there is a projected 2023/202A surplus of 56.01 community park acres and 216.29 regional park acres. A population increase of approximately 700 people necessitates an additional 0.84 community park acres (per 2019 AUIR, a loss of 0.0012 acres per person) and 1.89 regional park acres (per the 2019 AUIR, a loss of 0.0027 acres per person) to maintain Collier County level of service standards. The proposed development will not result in a reduction of level of service standards, as there is an adequate surplus of community and regional park acres, and the residential development will provide amenities. The 2019 AUIR estimates a utilization rate of 0.000061 EMS units per person. The proposed development will not result in a significant increase of demand, as an increase of 700 people will result in a requirement of 0.043 EMS units to serve the site. An EMS/fire station is located at 7010 Immokalee Road, approximately 1.5 miles East of the property. The subject site is within the North Collier Fire District. Please see attached Traffic Analysis for transportation impacts. u " kilt' �• �.wwa4 the ? I mpe r is I Strand o � 1�10 Itn�,erlal Golf` Golf Club � n > olliee s Reserve Cypress U'N Country Club La Playa y Golf Club `4 [Su"iect Site CD Old Collier Golf Club a W , Naples Park Riper_BI_v_d„.. 1 1 Immok�lee�Rd gr nj Z Stone bridge 3* Bay Colony Country Club r9 1 Golf Club North Collie 97th Ave N E Regional Par . E P an Marsh Blv� tercato Pelican N arsh t Tiburon Qr Golf C lub ve Y l� I la, J• C lub at Pelican Bay Pelican B y `411 In Rid a nge Blossom _ Dr Noryh N aple L r Cb m Pas _� P11 eR d S PGNo[ i Ou a N w R G Kensington Goff 8 ID boNn a s CIU Country' .le agle DI Club 0 1900 3800 0MAGNOLI """ ARBER & ::::::' RUNDAGE, INC. \l ucs 11 %, 1CC 1% Country Club Q uail Village Golf C lub a a0 Ne (a Ee C lub at Olds Cypress No at ElArra head Golf Satur<`� Course r 0 �o co a ti Vanderbilt Beach Rd /sla<4wR4- (=i► m 0 T he Q Vineyards of Naples dr 0' s �1vd Pine Ridge Rd Blue Coral Apartments WRM-ST Exhibit (Well Fields Map) Green B GfePn Can Esplanade Goff 3 Country Club in a a �u 'No Ife 5th Ave 1 st Ave SW 3 rd Ave SW 5th Ave SW 7t h Ave SW 9 51� 11 th Ave SW 131h Ave SW 15t h Ave SW Heritage Stone Bay Golf L--i ke Country Club The Q ua rry Boulder Lake 0 0 a co Calusa Fine s 0I �a*e Dr � Golf Club Goff C of tl =rye rg l U White Blvd It Ave SW Exhibit X.A.b Source: CC Well Field Map Created: 1 /27/2020 ABB PN: 20-0003 A.) Potable Water Demands Proposed Average Daily Flow (ADF) - Single Family Units People Per Unit Demand per Person* Number of Units ADF for Single Family Units *Per GMP/CIE Policy 1.5D - Club House Estimated Floor Area Demand per 100sf ADF for Club House Total ADF Potable Water Demands B.) Peak Water Flow Peaking Factor (PF)* *Per 2019 AUIR Hours of daily operation Adjusted Peak Hour Flow = ADF * PF Instantaneous Peak Flow C.) Sewage Generation Rate Proposed Average Daily Flow (ADF) - Single Family Units People Per Unit Demand per Person Number of Units ADF for Single Family Units - Club House Estimated Floor Area Demand per 100sf ADF for Club House Subtotal ADF Sewage Generation D.) Peak Sewage Demand Peaking Factor (PF)* *Per 2019 AUIR Hours of daily operation Adjusted Peak Hour Flow = ADF * PF Instantaneous Peak Flow Exhibit X.A.9 2.5 150 280 units 105,000 gpd 13,000 sf 15 gpd 1,950 gpd 106,950 gpd =1 0.11 JMGD 24 hrs => 139,035 gpd => 5,793 gph = 96.6 gpm 0.14 MGD 2.5 100 gpd 280 units 70,000 gpd = 13,000 sf = 15 gpd = 1,950 gpd = 71,950 gpd = 0.07 MGD 1.50 24 hrs => 107,925 gpd => 4,497 gph =1 14.0 gpm 0.11 MGD => 96.6 gpm => 74.9 gpm EXHIBIT G EVALUATION CRITERIA Blue Coral Apartments-CIG PUD CPUD Zoning Consideration (LDC Section 10.02.13.B) A. The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer, water, and other utilities. The proposed Residential PUD is ideally suited for the proposed location, compatible with surrounding uses, provides access and traffic circulation benefits and is located where public utilities and transit are readily available. The subject property of 9.35 acres is located on the southern side of Immokalee Road, approximately 800 feet east of the intersection of Livingston and Immokalee. It is in the urban designated area of Collier County, in close proximity to a major interchange Activity Center, in a density band, along a major transportation corridor, and close to public transit. It is bounded by residential multi family development (Bermuda Palms) to the west and the south (Livingston Lakes); commercial development to the east; and the Immokalee Road right of way to the north. See table below. Future Land Use Zoning District Existing Uses District NORTH Urban — Mixed Use N/A Immokalee Road Public right-of-way SOUTH Urban — Mixed Use RPUD Livingston Lakes Multi -family Residential EAST Urban — Mixed Use CPUD Vacant land, proposed car dealership WEST Urban — Mixed Use PUD Bermuda Palms, Multi -family Residential The Blue Coral Apartments RPUD proposes a multi family residential development of 280 rental units. The project will be highly amenitized and will provide well-appointed but smaller units in order to promote housing affordability. The proposed RPUD includes developer commitments to allocate 25% or 70 units to Essential Service Personnel, and of those 70 units, 35 will be income and rent restricted. The subject property and the proposed car dealership east of the subject property represent a natural extension of Activity Center 4. Activity Centers are areas within the County where the greatest densities and intensities are anticipated. This location represents an area where appropriate transportation and public infrastructure is available. Moreover, Activity Centers are mixed -use nodes that encourage and support higher densities since they provide goods, services and entertainment in close proximity to residential units. These nodes encourage transit and through proper interconnection also promote and support bicycle and pedestrian Blue Coral Apartments-CIG PUD Page 1 of 3 modes of transportation. The proposed Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) represents an infill project for which the Growth Management Plan allows a density bonus in recognition that smaller lots can be challenging to develop and that infilling appropriate areas provide benefits from an urbanization, public infrastructure, transportation standpoint. Additionally, the proposed project sits between a proposed car dealership and commercial uses to the east and multi family residential to the south. This infill project provides a favorable land use intensity transition from more intense commercial uses to the east to less intense residential communities to the west. The proposed RPUD is limited to multi family residential only and will provide assurance that more intense commercial uses will not be developed on the subject property. The PUD also includes enhanced setbacks and buffering, height limits and landscaping that ensure compatibility with adjacent properties. More detail associated with compatibility issues is provided in the Project Narrative. B. Adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of any proposed agreements, contract, or other instruments, or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense. Findings and recommendations of this type shall be made only after consultation with the county attorney. The subject property is under contract by the Applicant and developer of the proposed RPUD. Current ownership has executed the appropriate documentation required by the application authorizing the buyer to seek this zoning change. The Applicant/Developer or Assigns will retain unified control and will be responsible for continued operation and maintenance of the property. C. Conformity of the proposed PUD with the goals, objectives and policies of the Growth Management Plan. (This is to include identifying what Sub -district, policy or other provision allows the requested used/density, and fully explaining/addressing all criteria or conditions of that Sub -district, policy or other provision.) This application includes a companion GMP amendment to allow for the increased density through a new subdistrict. The creation of this subdistrict will allow for greater density and provision of affordable housing. The proposed RPUD willfully comply with the proposed subdistrict, and will meet all of the applicable provisions of the Growth Management Plan ("GMP'). The project is designed in compliance with the goals, objectives, and policies set forth in the Collier County Growth Management Plan (GMP) as follows: Future Land Use Element (FLUE) T Blue Coral Apartments-CIG PUD Page 2 of 3 he Overview explains the intent and concepts behind the land use regulations and the allocation of development to certain areas of the County. An overarching theme is "to protect and manage natural resource systems" by directing growth to urban designated areas stated as follows: Urban Designated Areas on the Future Land Use Map are located and configured to guide concentrated population growth and intensive land development away from areas of great sensitivity and toward areas more tolerant to development. Furthermore, the FLUE establishes the Use of Activities Centers as a means of concentrating future development in appropriate urban areas that help minimize urban sprawl and promote an efficient use of public infrastructure as stated below: The Mixed Use Activity Centers are intended to provide for concentrated commercial and mixed use development but with carefully configured access to the road network. Superior urban design is therefore promoted by carefully managing road access, avoiding strip commercial development, improving overall circulation patterns, and providing for community focal points. Policy 4.7. Access Management Plan provisions have been developed for Mixed Use and Interchange Activity Centers designated on the Future Land Use Map and these provisions have been incorporated into the Collier County Land Development Code. The intent of the Access Management Plan provisions is defined by the following guidelines and principles: a. The number of ingress and egress points shall be minimized and shall be combined and signalized to the maximum extent possible. b. Spacing of access points shall meet, to the maximum extent possible, the standards set forth in the Collier County Access Control Policy (Resolution No. 01-247, adopted June 26, 2001). c. Access points and turning movements shall be located and designed to minimize interference with the operation of existing and planned interchanges and intersections. d. Developers of lots, parcels, and subdivisions shall be encouraged to dedicate cross access easements, rights -of -way, and limited access easements, as necessary and appropriate, in order to ensure compliance with the above -mentioned standards (a. — c.) OBJECTIVE 5.• Implement land use policies that promote sound planning, protect environmentally sensitive lands and habitat for listed species while protecting private property rights, ensure compatibility of land uses and further the implementation of the Future Land Use Element. Policy 5. S: Discourage unacceptable levels of urban sprawl in order to minimize the cost of community facilities by: confining urban intensity development to areas designated as Urban on the Future Land Use Map Blue Coral Apartments-CIG PUD Page 3 of 3 OBJECTIVE 7: Promote smart growth policies, reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and adhere to the existing development character of the Collier County, where applicable, and as follows: Policy 7.1: The County shall encourage developers and property owners to connect their properties to fronting collector and arterial roads, except where no such connection can be made without violating intersection spacing requirements of the Land Development Code. Policy 7.3: All new and existing developments shall be encouraged to connect their local streets and/or interconnection points with adjoining neighborhoods or other developments regardless of land use type. The interconnection of local streets between developments is also addressed in Policy 9.3 of the Transportation Element. Policy 7.4: The County shall encourage new developments to provide walkable communities with a blend of densities, common open spaces, civic facilities and a range of housing prices and types. Housing Element GOAL 1: TO CREATE AN ADEQUATE SUPPLY OF DECENT, SAFE, SANITARY, AND AFFORDABLE HOUSING FOR ALL RESIDENTS OF COLLIER COUNTY. OBJECTIVE 1: Provide new affordable housing units in order to meet the current and future housing needs of legal residents with very -low, low, moderate and affordable workforce incomes, including households with special needs such as rural and farmworker housing in rural Collier County OBJECTIVE 2: Increase the number of affordable housing units, by the methods contained in Objective I and subsequent Policies, for very -low, low, moderate and affordable workforce income residents with the assistance of for profit and not -for -profit providers of affordable housing, within the County and its municipalities Policy 2.2: Partnerships shall be encouraged between private developers, non-profit entities, local governments and other interested parties to ensure the development of housing that meets the needs of the County's very -low, low, moderate and affordable workforce income residents. Policy 2.4: The County shall, with the City of Naples, continue to review existing codes and ordinances and amend them as needed to allow for flexible and innovative residential design that encourages mixed use development with a variety of housing designs, styles, and price ranges. Transportation Element OBJECTIVE 7. Develop and adopt standards for safe and efficient ingress and egress to adjoining properties, and encourage safe and convenient on -site traffic circulation through the development review process. Policy 9.3: The County shall require, wherever feasible, the interconnection of local streets between developments to facilitate convenient movement throughout the road network. The Blue Coral Apartments-CIG PUD Page 4 of 3 LDC shall identify the circumstances and conditions that would require the interconnection of neighboring developments, and shall also develop standards and criteria for the safe interconnection of such local streets. OBJECTIVE 12: Encourage the efficient use of transit services now and in the future. D. The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening requirements. The proposed PUD Master Plan, and proposed development standards require enhanced setbacks and buffers to ensure compatibility with surrounding uses. For more information on site design, setbacks, buffers and compatibility, please see the Project Narrative. E. The adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the development. The proposed development will meet or exceed the minimum open space requirements of the Collier County LDC. Usable open space in the form of a recreational area, common areas, pedestrian walkways, and a preserve will be provided throughout the development. The proposed building will incorporate courtyards with amenities which will create visual interest, reduce massing, improve aesthetics and provide easily accessible open space and recreational areas for the residents. F. The timing or sequence of development for the purpose of assuring the adequacy of available improvements and facilities, both public and private. Public and private improvements and facilities are available for the site. Water and sewer service is available. Roadway capacity as confirmed by the provided TIS. Drainage is adequate for the site. Waste management, cable, electric, and telephone service are available. Adequate schools, police, fire, bus, park, and health care facilities are within the proposed development's service area. Payment of impact fees and timing of adequate public facilities certification are mechanisms to assure the development is appropriately serviced. G. The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion. The proposed residential community is an ideal infill project that is compatible with surrounding mix of uses and is appropriate for the general area and the specific property. The PUD will implement the proposed Immokalee Road Interchange Residential Infill Subdistrict, and will provide affordable housing and transportation benefits for the county and the immediate surrounding area. H. Conformity with PUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in this particular case, based on determination that such modifications of justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations. The proposed development conforms with the intent of the PUD regulations by establishing uses and development regulations that are consistent with or exceed those of similar multi - Blue Coral Apartments-CIG PUD Page 5 of 3 family residential developments in Collier County. No deviations are requested as part of this project. Blue Coral Apartments-CIG PUD Page 6 of 3 THIS INSTRUMENT PREPARED BY AND RETURN TO: MUTUAL GRANT OF EASEMENT AND SHARED ACCESS THIS MUTUAL GRANT OF EASEMENT AND SHARED ACCESS ("Easement") is made this day of , 2021, by and between William C. Scherer, as Trustee of the William C. Scherer Trust u/a/d May 5, 1994, as amended and restated on June 17, 2015 ("Scherer"), whose address is c/o Excel Real Estate, 2375 N. Tamiami Trail #206, Naples, FL 34103 ("Scherer"), and JAZ Automotive Properties, LLC, an Ohio limited liability company authorized to do business in the State of Florida, whose address is 4250 Morse Crossing, Columbus, OH 43219 ("JAZ"). BACKGROUND A. SCHERER is the owner of the real property described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof by reference (the "SCHERER Property"). JAZ is the owner of the real property more particularly described in Exhibit `B" attached hereto and made a part hereof by reference (the "JAZ Property"). B. In connection with Collier County Ordinance 2020-032 , SCHERER and JAZ desire to grant to each other the right, but not the obligation, to construct a shared access drive over a portion of the SCHERER Property and the JAZ Property, as more particularly described on Exhibit "C" (the "Easement Area") and in connection therewith mutually grant a perpetual, non-exclusive easement to the other for ingress and egress, as well as for construction, installation and maintenance of roads, sidewalks, median landscaping, over, under and across the Easement Area located on their respective property. C. SCHERER and JAZ execute this document to evidence their agreement with respect to the Easement. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the covenants and conditions hereinafter set forth, SCHERER and JAZ hereby grant, set over, convey and deliver to the other parry, its successors and assigns, a perpetual, non-exclusive easement in, under, upon, about, over and through the Easement Area, located on their respective property, for vehicular and pedestrian ingress, egress, access, as well as construction, installation and maintenance of roads, sidewalks, and landscaping, substantially in compliance with the Access Road Sketch attached as Exhibit "D". This Easement is given for the purpose of allowing SCHERER and JAZ the right to construct, use and maintain a permanent access drive, together with any sidewalks, median landscaping and other improvements within the Easement Area as may be reasonably necessary or desirable for purposes of ingress and egress to and from the SCHERER Property and the JAZ Property as depicted on Exhibit "D" (collectively the "Improvements"). Page 1 of 11 The Easement shall exist on the following terms and conditions: 1. Based on the status of development approvals for both parties, it is likely that JAZ will need the Improvements before SCHERER. Accordingly, JAZ shall take responsibility for the design, construction and permitting of the Improvements. The existing lanes on Immokalee Road will need to be reconfigured to align with the new median opening and will be generally constructed in conformance with Exhibit "D", which work will be undertaken by JAZ within the Immokalee Road right of way. Notwithstanding the foregoing, SCHERER shall be entitled to construct the Improvements, as shown in Exhibit "D", within the Easement Area if they are not undertaken by JAZ. Regardless of the party constructing the Improvements, all such work shall be designed, permitted, and constructed in compliance with applicable governmental ordinances, codes and regulations (collectively the "Codes"). SCHERER agrees to reimburse JAZ for fifty percent (50%) of all costs incurred therewith if JAZ constructs the Improvements, including hard costs and soft costs. Conversely, JAZ agrees that it shall reimburse JAZ fifty percent (50%) of all costs incurred therewith if JAZ were to construct the Improvements. Such costs shall be reimbursed within thirty (30) days after the date of the notice which shall include copies of paid invoices and a certificate of completion sent from the party that constructs such Improvements (the "constructing party") to the other party. Estimated costs for the Improvements are set forth on attached Exhibit "E". Notwithstanding the foregoing, the party which does not construct the Improvements (the "non -constructing party") shall only be liable to the constructing party for one-half of the total cost of such Improvements if they had been constructed to the minimum Codes requirements. If either party wishes to construct improvements which are above and beyond such requirements, such party shall be liable for 100% of any excess costs above the Codes requirements unless the parties mutually agree otherwise. 2. Any construction by either SCHERER or JAZ shall be performed by licensed contractor(s) who will provide to the non -constructing party with evidence of insurance prior to and as a condition of the commencement of any construction. The non -constructing party shall be named as additional insured. Such insurance shall be issued by an insurance company rated A- or better by A.M. Best, as follows: (a) commercial liability - $1,000,000 each occurrence, $2,000,000 general aggregate, (b) workers' compensation in amounts required by applicable law, (c) automobile liability - $1,000,000 per accident, and (d) employer's liability - $1,000,000 each accident, $1,000,000 each employee. Copies of all permit applications and the contractor's estimate of the cost for work within the Easement Area shall be provided to the non -constructing party prior to submittal of the permit applications. SCHERER and JAZ covenant to the other that no mechanic or construction lien shall be placed on the part of the Easement Area owned by the non -constructing party related to the construction of the Improvements depicted on Exhibit D. In the event such a mechanic or construction lien is recorded on the property owned by the non - constructing party, the constructing party shall within fifteen (15) days of recording transfer the lien to a bond or other security to remove the mechanic or construction lien from the property, failing which, the non -constructing party may act to remove the mechanic or construction lien from its property, and seek to collect all sums paid in connection therewith from the constructing party and, in connection therewith, exercise its rights under Section 6 below. In the event that the non -constructing party receives any notices of any violations occurring in connection with the construction of the Improvements, whether such notices are received from any public or private source, the non -constructing party shall forward copies of same to the constructing party which shall have thirty (30) days from receipt of same to cure such violations, failing which the non - constructing party shall have the right to correct such violations and to recover the costs thereof from the constructing party, including, but not limited to, costs of enforcement, fines and penalties Page 2 of 11 and administration. Prior to the commencement of construction of the Improvements and at all times thereafter, SCHERER and JAZ shall each maintain in full force and effect, comprehensive public liability insurance, written by a company rated A- or better by A.M. Best and insuring against the risks of bodily injury, death, and property damage or loss occurring within or as a result of the use of the Easement Area by SCHERER, JAZ and their employees, contract parties, customers, agents and invitees, with a minimum single limit of not less than $2,000,000 per occurrence, coverage to be in a comprehensive general liability form. The foregoing coverage requirements may be provided by a combination of comprehensive general liability and umbrella policy provided that at all times not less than $2,000,000 per occurrence is available. Both policies shall provide that such policy may not be cancelled or modified without at least thirty (30) days prior written notice to the other party. SCHERER and JAZ shall provide the other party, on or before the effective date of the policy, a certificate evidencing the insurance required hereunder and stating that such insurance is in full force and effect, that the premiums therefore have been paid and that the other party and its mortgagee on the Easement Area have been named as insured parties. 3. The parties acknowledge and agree that they shall share equally in the maintenance and repair of the Easement Area, and that the Easement Area shall at all times be kept in good condition and repair. If either party performs any maintenance of the Easement Area, the performing party shall deliver an invoice to the non -performing party setting forth all costs and expenses incurred in performing such work, including hard and soft costs, together with copies of paid invoices from any third party suppliers or contractors evidencing the same, and the non- performing party shall reimburse the performing party for fifty percent (50%) of the costs and expenses within thirty (30) days after receipt of such invoice from the performing party. 4. No party may block, remove, reconfigure or otherwise materially alter the Easement Area or the access road constructed thereon without the other party's prior written consent. Provided, however, that nothing herein shall prevent either party from connecting internal sidewalks, drives and/or roadways on their respective property to the access road constructed within the Easement Area at their own expense. The Easement Area shall at all times be used in a legal manner and in compliance with all applicable laws and ordinances. 5. Each party shall indemnify and hold the other party harmless from and against any claims, suits, costs, expenses and other liabilities arising out of each party's use of the Easement Area by itself, or by its tenants, employees, customers, agents or other invitees, or otherwise arising out of any violation of this Agreement. 6. In the event that SCHERER or JAZ shall fail to timely pay or reimburse ("Owing Party") the other party any amount due under this Easement ("Owed Party"), then interest shall accrue on the unpaid amount at the maximum rate permitted by law, and Owed Party may record a claim of lien against the Owing Party's property to secure the obligation of Owing Party to pay such amount to Owed Party. The lien evidenced by such claim of lien shall be effective upon, and shall arise only from and after, the recording of such claim of lien in the Public Records of Collier County, Florida. Such claim of lien may be foreclosed in the same manner as the foreclosure of a mortgage encumbering real property. Such claim of lien may be transferred to security by the Owing Party in accordance with the procedures set forth in Florida Statute Chapter 713. Page 3 of 11 7. This Easement shall be recorded in the Public Records of Collier County, Florida. The rights and obligations created hereunder shall run with the properties described herein and shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of each party and its successors and assigns, and upon any and all subsequent owners of the SCHERER Property and JAZ Property, or any portion thereof. For the avoidance of doubt, the right to construct the Improvements within the Easement Area as set forth herein may be exercisable by any successor owner(s) of the SCHERER Property and/or JAZ Property, and the obligation to reimburse the party undertaking such construction shall accrue to the then owner of the SCHERER Property and JAZ Property not undertaking such construction at the time of such construction. 8. The Easement shall not be deemed a dedication of the Easement Area to the general public. 9. Miscellaneous. (a) Any notice, demand, request or communication required or permitted hereunder shall be in writing and sent by hand delivery, United States certified mail, postage prepaid, or by recognized overnight delivery service, addressed to the parties addresses provided for herein or to such other address or to the attention of such other person as hereafter shall be designated in writing by the parties sent in accordance herewith. Any such notice, demand, request or communication shall be deemed to have been given as of the date of receipt or refusal at the address, and in the manner, provided herein. (b) When the context in which words are used in this Easement indicates that such is the intent, words in the singular number shall include the plural and vice versa, and the words in masculine gender shall include the feminine and neuter genders and vice versa. (c) In the event that any provision of this Easement shall be held to be invalid, the same shall not affect in any respect whatsoever the validity of the remaining provisions of this Easement. (d) This Easement contains the entire understanding and agreement between the parties and supersedes any prior written or oral agreements between them respecting the subject matter contained herein. There are no representations, agreements, arrangements or understandings, oral or written, between and among the parties relating to the subject matter of this Easement that are not fully expressed herein. (e) The failure of any party hereto to insist upon strict performance of any of the servitudes, easements, privileges, rights, covenants, agreements, terms and conditions hereunder, irrespective of the length of time for which such failure continues, shall not be a waiver of any of such party's rights. No consent or waiver, express or implied, to or of any breach or default in the performance of any obligation hereunder shall constitute a consent or waiver to or of any other breach or default in the performance of the same or any obligation hereunder. (f) This Easement may be changed, modified or amended only by an instrument in writing duly executed and acknowledged by the parties. Page 4 of 11 (g) This Easement is made and shall be governed by and construed according to the laws of the State of Florida. Venue for any litigation arising out of this Agreement shall lie exclusively in a court of appropriate jurisdiction in Collier County, Florida, and in no other venue or forum. (h) This Easement may be executed in any number of counterparts with the same effect as if the parties had signed the same document. All such counterparts shall be construed together and shall constitute one instrument. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have hereunto set its hand and seal this day of , 2021. Witness Name: Witness Name: STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER SCHERER: William C. Scherer, as Trustee of the William C. Scherer Trust u/a/d May 5, 1994, as amended and restated on June 17, 2015 I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me by means of physical presence this day of , 2021, by William C. Scherer, as Trustee of the William C. Scherer Trust u/a/d May 5, 1994, as amended and restated on June 17, 2015, who is personally known to me OR produced as identification. (Notary Seal) Notary Public of Florida Printed Name of Notary Public My Commission Expires: Page 5 of 11 Witness Name: Witness Name: STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER JAZ: Flavio Galasso, Director of Operations JAZ Automotive Properties, LLC An Ohio limited liability company I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me by means of physical presence this day of , 2021, by , as President of JAZ Automotive Properties, LLC an Ohio limited liability company, on behalf of the compnay, who is personally known to me OR produced as identification. (Notary Seal) Notary Public of Florida Printed Name of Notary Public My Commission Expires: Page 6 of 11 EXHIBIT "A" SCHERER PROPERTY Page 7 of 11 N 1/4 CORNER OF NW CORNER OF SECTON W, Y b 5, R. 28 E S 89'58'36" E (BEARING BASIS) 2640.19' (CALC) SEC ON 30. T. 48 S. R. 26 E. PER DNR REPCRT DOC.f-805 PER DNR REPORT DOC.f0811105 NORTH LINE OF SECTION 30, T.48 S., R. 26 E. S 89.58'36" E 660.05' I 8 f IMMOKALEE ROAD 100' R/W S 89"58'36" E 330.01' MEDIAN SOUTH R UNE PER DEED cam w1x wEa� w Cow autt nm Pp D s � SEE NOTE a— I CONRC. Ii DETAIL I 1u 1ez I ' ZONE 'Y' 0 ASPHALT PARKINGI Z N z p CONC. I >' N SIDEWAUC Y cr 1y1 vs. Ly C7 Ipp W SEC. 30, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, m W 1/2 OF E 1/2 OF NW 1/4 OF NW 1/4, LESS N 1GO FEET. COWER COUNTY, FLORIDA. I f A2I pp A I (VACANT) Ca W 08 I I I y In ZONE "AE" I SURVEYORS' NOTES: 1) No Tide Commitment or Abstract of Title was furnished to the Surveyor. 2) There are 4 concrete power poles and guy wires along the North line of the subject property. No recorded easement has been furnished to the surveyor, Surveyor was unable to locate a recorded document for these poles. 3) Street Address Is 5000 Immokoles Road, Naples, FL 4) Bearings cre based on thr North line of the NW 1/4 of Section 30, T.48 S., R 27 E. BEING S 89'5836" E (ASSUMED) 5) Property Is In Flood Zone "X", "AE" @ "AH" per F.I.R.M. Panel 120G67, 12021"C" 0194"H", dated 05/16/2012 the Flood Zone INe. shown on survey were copied from the FEMA DFlrm map and are appr..i..t. 6) ALL ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON THIS PLAT ARE BASED ON NAVD88 DATUM. BERMUDA PALMS, A \�0 CONDOMINIUM O.R.BOOK 3575, PAGE 1325 (OCCUPIED) /ZONE "AE" IL) DA ZONE "AH" Us ZONE "AH" ZONE "AE" ZONE "AH" I I ZONE "X"-500/ HUBERT SCHERER TRUST O.R. BOOK 4466. PAGE 1075 (VACANT) TO CAPITAL INVESTMENT DEVELOPMENT GROUP, INC.; "CHAN UNK FENCE THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THIS MAP OR PLAT AND THE SURVEY ON WHICH IT IS BASED V I WERE MADE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE 2016 MINIMIUM STANDARD DETAIL ALTA/NSPS LAND TIRE SURVEYS, JOINTLY ESTABLISHED AND ADOPTED REOUIREBY "A" — — — — 8"—MAIN! FND 5/GIBtF 0. FENCE a 6�• ALTAMENTSFOR AND AND 11 & 13 OF TABLE THEREOF. THE FIELD WORK WAS COMPLETED ON AUGUST 2, 2019 P .'" N 895813W 329.86' n� "pro ROD & CAF, FENCE POST IMEGIBIE DATE OF PLAT: AUGUST 13, 2019 VAWAM A. DONOVAN @ 0.8 Sou1N PATRIGA DONOVAN GRANADOS UNNCSTON LAKES, A � � O.R. BOOK 5603, PAGE 1848 CONDOMINIUM O.R. BOOK 3286, (VACANT) PAGE 3286 DENNIS M. SR. A (OCCUPIED) UNLESS SEALED NOT VALID UNLESS SIGNED AND SEALED WITH A EMBOSSED RAISED SEAL OF THE FLORIDAFLOLICENSED SURVEYOR AND MAPPER. ri 0 z ]0 10 SCALE: 1" = 100' PREPARED FOR: CAPITAL INVESTMENT DEVELOPMENT GROUP, INC. EXHIBIT `B" JAZ PROPERTY Page 8 of 11 r ounF ER �- A �a SECDOn 101 E 4865, R8' E A _- N SCALE: 1" = 80' SYMBOLS LEGEND IF = FOUND CONCRETE MONUMENT • = SET 5/8- IRON ROD/CAP += SIGN (AS NOTED) = TELEPHONE RISER = CONCRETE POWER POLE E-- = POWER POLE ANCHOR P0= WATER VALVE ® = AIR RELEASE VALVE M SEWER VALVE TOB = TOP OF BANK TOS = TOE OF SLOPE RIPTION THE EAST HALF OF THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 30, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST; SUBJECT TO EXISTING RESTRICTIONS AND RESERVATIONS OF RECORD; AND EXCEPTING THE NORTH 100 FEET THEREOF PREVIOUSLY CONVEYED FOR HIGHWAY RIGHT OF WAY. SURVEYOR'S NOTES: THIS BOUNDARY SURVEY MEETS THE STANDARDS OF PRACTICE SET FORTH BY THE FLORIDA BOARD OF LAND SURVEYORS IN CHAPTER 5J-17, FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE, PURSUANT TO SECTION 472.027, FLORIDA STATUTES. THIS BOUNDARY SURVEY IS NOT VALID WITHOUT THE SIGNATURE AND THE ORIGINAL RAISED SEAL OF THE FLORIDA LICENSED SURVEYOR AND MAPPER. ADDITIONS OR DELETIONS TO SURVEY MAPS OR REPORTS BY OTHER THAN THE SIGNING PARTIES WITHOUT THE WRITTEN CONSENT OF THE SIGNING PARTY OR PARTIES IS PROHIBITED BY CHAPTER 11-17 FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE. THIS BOUNDARY SURVEY IS CERTIFIED AS TO THE DATE OF FIELD SURVEY, NOT THE SIGNATURE DATE. ABSTRACT NOT REVIEWED GENERAL NOTES: 1. DIMENSIONS ARE IN FEET AND DECIMALS THEREOF. 2. R.O.W. = RIGHT-OF-WAY. 3. ELEVATIONS ARE BASED ON NAVD88 DATUM. 4. BEARINGS AND COORDINATES ARE BASED ON THE FLORIDA STATE PLANE GRID, EAST ZONE, 83/90 ADJUSTMENT. 5. ACCORDING TO FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY COMMUNITY NUMBER 120067, FL000 INSURANCE RATE MAP NUMBER 12021C, PANEL NUMBERS 194 AND 213, SUFFIX H, DATE OF FIRM INDEX MAY 16, 2012, THE SUBJECT PROPERTY LIES IN ZONE AE, WITH A BASE FLOOD ELEVATION OF 10.0 AND 10.5, ZONE AN, WITH A BASE FLOOD ELEVATION OF 11 AND ZONES X AND X500, WITH NO BASE FLOOD ELEVATION. 6. THIS SURVEY WAS PREPARED WITH THE BENEFIT OF A COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE PREPARED BY OLD REPUBLIC NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY, FILE NUMBER 18133343 SEE DATED DECEMBER 13, 201B AT 8:00 A.M. EXCEPTIONS 1-7 AND 9 LISTED ON SCHEDULE B-II ARE NOT PLOTTABLE, EXCEPTION 8 IS PLOTTABLE AND DEPICTED AS ® ON THE DRAWING. 7. OVERHEAD WIRES EXIST BETWEEN THE CONCRETE POWER POLES. 8. THE JURISDICTIONAL LINES WERE DETERMINED BY PASSARELLA AND ASSOCIATES, INC. AT THE TIME OF ISSUANCE OF THIS SURVEY, THIS FEMA INFORMATION HAD NOT BEEN SUBMITTED TO THE LOCAL FEMA OFFICIALS FOR VERIFICATION. THE LOCAL FEMA OFFICIALS ARE THE FINAL AUTHORITY REGARDING THE VALIDITY AND SUFFICIENCY OF THIS FEMA DATA. THEIR OPINION SHOULD BE OBTAINED PRIOR TO RELYING ON THIS DATA. CONTACT: COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT, 2800 N. HORSESHOE DRIVE, NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104. PHONE # (239) 252-2485. To: JAZ REAL ESTATE HOLDING COMPANY, LLC This is to certify that this map or plat and the s .vey o which it is based w made in c ...dance with the 2016 Minimum Standard Det.il Requirements f.. ALTA/NSPS Land Title Surveys, jointly established and adopted by ALTA and NSPS, .nd includes Items 1-4, 6, 8, 11, 13. 16 and 18 of T.ble A thereof. The fieldwork was completed .n March 4, 2019. GEORGE W. HACKNEY, P.S.M. NO. 5606 Map date: March 13, 2019 vision. tor. AAZ REAL ESTATE HOLDING COMPANY, LLC design: title: BOUNDARY AND TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY OF GE MAIN TOYOTA PRE -OWNED PART OF SECTION 30, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST drawn: checked: GWH COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA#: I� date: ....liGNOLI 1199 33 MARCH 13q-t- aProject iMARBER &i.URUNDAGE,— IB-o,Sosheet Prof•si—I engineers, ph,.- curve & landscape architects e.: (rsuWn-sill n� lasl5ee-sass vew:["� #: #: f file #: EXHIBIT "C" EASEMENT AREA Legal Description of Easement Area on SCHERER Property Legal Description of Easement Area on JAZ Property Page 9 of 11 IMMOKALEE ROAD o LESS THE NORTH 100 FEET LESS THE NORTH 100 FEET 100.00 r1i FOR IMMOKALEE ROAD 100.00 FOR IMMOKALEE ROAD olo 50.00 m P.O.B. O.R. 1716, 50�00 PG. 1552 L r cn ACCESS EASEMENT I (0.11 ACt) I r w � L2 J WILLIAM C. SCHERER TRUST JAZ AUTOMOTIVE PROPERTIES LLC (O.R. BOOK 5460, PG. 132) (O.R. BOOK 5696, PG. 1480) LINE TABLE LINE BEARING DISTANCE L1 S 02*05'17" E 140.71' L2 N 89°59'50" W 30.13' L3 N 02°06'48" W 58.51' L4 N 12`37'29" W 26.99' L5 N 02°05' 1 1 " W 55.85' L6 S 89°58'44" E 35.09' GENERAL NOTES: 1. DIMENSIONS ARE IN FEET AND DECIMALS THEREOF. 2. BEARINGS AND COORDINATES ARE BASED ON THE FLORIDA STATE PLANE GRID, EAST ZONE, 83/90 ADJUSTMENT. 3. P.O.C. = POINT OF COMMENCEMENT. P.O.B. = POINT OF BEGINNING. PREPARED FOR THE BENEFIT OF: JAZ AUTOMOTIVE PROPERTIES LLC A GROVER MATHENEY TRUST GASPER STATION, PHASE 4 TRACT "FD-5" (PLAT BOOK 63, PAGES 55-57) GEORGE W. HACKNEY, PSM 5606 LEGAL DESCRIPTION ATTACHED NOT A SURVEY N SCALE: 1" = 100' ...... 7400 Trail Blvd., Suite 200 mmoMA GNOLI Naples, FL 34108 ommom� PH: (239) 597-31 1 1 ■1■■1B ARBER & www.ABBINC.com ■o■■o■b ::::::r RUNDAGE, INC. LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF AN ACCESS EASEMENT ALL THAT PART OF THOSE LANDS AS DESCRIBED IN O.R. BOOK 5460, PG. 132, PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LANDS, SAID POINT ALSO BEING ON THE NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF IMMOKALEE ROAD; THENCE S 02005' 17" E ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID LANDS A DISTANCE OF 150.10 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE PARCEL HEREIN BEING DESCRIBED; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID EAST LINE S 02005'17" E A DISTANCE OF 140.71 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID EAST LINE N 89059'50" W A DISTANCE OF 30.13 FEET; THENCE N 02006'48" W A DISTANCE OF 58.51 FEET; THENCE N 12037'29" W A DISTANCE OF 26.99 FEET; THENCE N 02005'11" W A DISTANCE OF 55.85 FEET; THENCE S 89058'44" E A DISTANCE OF 35.09 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE PARCEL HEREIN DESCRIBED. CONTAINING A TOTAL AREA OF APPROXIMATELY 0.11 ACRES. REFERENCE AB DRAWING #12461-SD2 PAGE 1OF1 IMMOKALEE ROAD o LESS THE NORTH 100 FEET LESS THE NORTH 100 FEET 100.00 r1i FOR IMMOKALEE ROAD 100.00 FOR IMMOKALEE ROAD olo 50.00 m P.O.B. O.R. 1716, 50.00 PG. 1552 IACCEI SS EASEMENT (0.10 ACt) L WILLIAM C. SCHERER TRUST (O.R. BOOK 5460, PG. 132) GENERAL NOTES: 1. DIMENSIONS ARE IN FEET AND DECIMALS THEREOF. 2. BEARINGS AND COORDINATES ARE BASED ON THE FLORIDA STATE PLANE GRID, EAST ZONE, 83/90 ADJUSTMENT. 3. P.O.C. = POINT OF COMMENCEMENT. P.O.B. = POINT OF BEGINNING. JAZ AUTOMOTIVE PROPERTIES LLC (O.R. BOOK 5696, PG. 1480) LINE TABLE LINE BEARING DISTANCE L1 S 89°58'44" E 34.96' L2 S 02*05' 1 1 " E 53.28' L3 S 08°44'44" W 26.94' L4 S 02` 13'39" E 60.78' L5 N 89`59'50" W 30.03, L6 N 02*05' 17" W 140.71 ' A GROVER MATHENEY TRUST GASPER STATION, PHASE 4 TRACT "FD-5" (PLAT BOOK 63, PAGES 55-57) PREPARED FOR THE BENEFIT OF: WILLIAM C. SCHERER TRUST GEORGE W. HACKNEY, PSM 5606 LEGAL DESCRIPTION ATTACHED NOT A SURVEY N SCALE: 1" = 100' ...... 7400 Trail Blvd., Suite 200 mmoMA GNOLI Naples, FL 34108 ommom� PH: (239) 597-31 1 1 ■1■■1B ARBER & www.ABBINC.com ■o■■o■b ::::::r RUNDAGE, INC. LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF AN ACCESS EASEMENT ALL THAT PART OF THOSE LANDS AS DESCRIBED IN O.R. BOOK 5696, PG. 1480, PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LANDS, SAID POINT ALSO BEING ON THE NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF IMMOKALEE ROAD; THENCE S 02005' 17" E ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID LANDS A DISTANCE OF 150.10 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE PARCEL HEREIN BEING DESCRIBED; THENCE LEAVING SAID WEST LINE S 89058'44" E A DISTANCE OF 34.96 FEET; THENCE S 02005'11" E A DISTANCE OF 53.28 FEET; THENCE S 08044'44" W A DISTANCE OF 26.94 FEET; THENCE S 02013'39" E A DISTANCE OF 60.78 FEET; THENCE N 89059'50" W A DISTANCE OF 30.03 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH SAID WEST LINE; THENCE N 02005'17" W ALONG SAID WEST LINE A DISTANCE OF 140.71 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE PARCEL HEREIN DESCRIBED. CONTAINING A TOTAL AREA OF APPROXIMATELY 0.10 ACRES. REFERENCE ABB DRAWING #12461 -SD I PAGE 2OF2 EXHIBIT "D" ACCESS ROAD SKETCH FOR EASEMENT AREA Page 10 of 11 "■ GNOLI °O ARBER& GERMAIN IMMOKALEE & BLUE CORAL APARTMENTS ■i� ■SBRUNDAGE, mc. 7400 Trail BWd., Suite 200 •Naples, FL 34108 SHARED ACCESS PH: (239) 597-3111 • FAX: (239) 566-2203 SCALE: 1" = 70' L ,r I I O - I m m IF BLUE CORAL OD - D I GERMAIN i I I EXHIBIT E Estimate of Costs Page 11 of 11 AGNOLI BARBER & `NNNN%N BRUNDAGE, INC. Professional Engineers, Planners, Surveyors & Landscape Architects Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Preliminary Pre -Design Lexus Cross Easement ABB Project: 18-0011 Date: January 19, 2021 DESCRIPTION AMOUNT ON SITE Facilities $3,000 Roadway $32,175 Drainage/ Stormwater $18,750 Subtotal: $53,925 RIGHT TURN LANE Facilities $45,000 Roadway $29,000 Drainage/ Stormwater $17,250 Subtotal: $91,250 IMMOKALEE ROAD MEDIAN Facilities $7,000 Roadway $27,375 Subtotal: $34,375 Pretotal: $179, 550 Design/ Permitting/ CEI $26,933 Mobilization/ Demobilization $17,955 Contingency $26,933 TOTAL: $251,370 Notes: This Opinion of Probable Cost (OPC) has been prepared by Agnoli, Barber & Brundage, Inc. (ABB) at the request of the owner or as a requirement of governmental agency. ABB has based the unit costs of this OPC on previous work history with similar projects or on values provided by reputable contractors we have worked with in accordance with F.A.C. 61 G-1518.011, this is not a guarantee or warranty expressed or implied as to the construction cost that may be obtained by owner using competitive bidding. If such a guarantee is needed, it is recommended that owner procure the services of a professional cost estimator or obtain a binding bid from a contractor. ❑❑❑❑❑;� 00007 GNOLI ❑❑❑❑❑p ARBER & ❑❑❑❑❑❑� 0000007 RUNDAGE, INC. Professional Engineers, Planners, Surveyors & Mappers Lexus Cross Easement Engineers Opinion of Probable Construction Cost 1/19/2021 ON SITE FACILITIES COMPONENTS QUANTITY UNITS UNIT COST COST Landscape and Irrigation 1 LS $ 3,000 $ 3,000 Subtotal: $ 3,000 ROADWAY is Concrete S/W 150 LF $ 15 $ 2,250 1-1/2" Asphalt 670 SY $ 12 $ 8,040 6" Lime Rock Sub -Base 670 SY $ 10.5 $ 7,035 12" Sub -Grade Stabilization 670 SY $ 2 $ 1,340 Curb & Gutter 250 LF $ 20 $ 5,000 Lighting Road 250 LF $ 18 $ 4,500 Earthwork/ Fill 670 CY $ 3.0 $ 2,010 Sign and Stripe 1 LS $ 2,000 $ 2,000 Subtotal: $ 32,175 DRAINAGE / STORMWATER Catch Basins 2 EA $ 6,000 $ 12,000 18" RCP 150 LF $ 45 $ 6,750 Subtotal: $ 18,750 TOTAL: $ 53,925 RIGHT TURN LANE FACILITIES COMPONENTS QUANTITY UNITS UNIT COST COST Landscape and Irrigation I LS $ 15,000 $ 15,000 Power Line Relocation 3 EA $ 10,000 $ 30,000 Subtotal: I I I $ 45,000 ROADWAY Concrete S/W 250 LF $ 15 $ 3,750 1-1/2" Asphalt 500 SY $ 12 $ 6,000 6" Lime Rock Sub -Base 500 SY $ 10.5 $ 5,250 12" Sub -Grade Stabilization 500 SY $ 2 $ 1,000 Curb & Gutter 250 LF $ 20 $ 5,000 Lighting Road 250 LF $ 18 $ 4,500 Earthwork/ Fill 500 CY $ 3.0 $ 1,500 Sign and Stripe 1 LS $ 2,000 $ 2,000 Subtotal: $ 29,000 DRAINAGE / STORMWATER Catch Basins 1 EA $ 6,000 $ 6,000 18" RCP 250 LF $ 45 $ 11,250 Subtotal: $ 17,250 TOTAL: $ 91,250 IMMOKALEE ROAD MEDIAN FACILITIES COMPONENTS QUANTITY UNITS UNIT COST COST Landscape and Irrigation 1 LS $ 7,000 $ 7,000 Subtotal: $ 7,000 ROADWAY 1-1/2" Asphalt 450 SY $ 12 $ 5,400 6" Lime Rock Sub -Base 450 SY $ 10.5 $ 4,725 12" Sub -Grade Stabilization 450 SY $ 2 $ 900 Curb & Gutter 250 LF $ 20 $ 5,000 Earthwork/ Fill 450 CY $ 3.0 $ 1,350 Sign and Stripe 1 LS $ 10,000 $ 10,000 Subtotal: $ 27,375 TOTAL: $ 34,375 (CHAPTER 8, COLLIER COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE FOR LAND DEVELOPMENT) A zoning sign(s) must be posted by the petitioner or the petitioner's agent on the parcel for a minimum of fifteen (15) calendar days in advance of the first public hearing and said sign(s) must be maintained by the petitioner or the petitioner's agent through the Board of County Commissioners Hearing. Below are general guidelines for signs, however these guidelines should not be construed to supersede any requirement of the LDC. For specific sign requirements, please refer to the Administrative Code, Chapter 8 E. 1. The sign(s) must be erected in full view of the public, not more than five (5) feet from the nearest street right-of-way or easement. 2. The sign(s) must be securely affixed by nails, staples, or other means to a wood frame or to a wood panel and then fastened securely to a post, or other structure. The sign may not be affixed to a tree or other foliage. 3. The petitioner or the petitioner's agent must maintain the sign(s) in place, and readable condition until the requested action has been heard and a final decision rendered. If the sign(s) is destroyed, lost, or rendered unreadable, the petitioner or the petitioner's agent must replace the sign(s NOTE: AFTER THE SIGN HAS BEEN POSTED, THIS AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE SHOULD BE RETURNED NO LATER THAN TEN (10) WORKING DAYS BEFORE THE FIRST HEARING DATE TO THE ti ASSIGNED PLANNER AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER BEFORE THE UNDERSIGNED AUTHORITY, PERSONALLY APPEARED ?A-rR/ CK WHO ON OATH SAYS THAT HE/SHE HAS POSTED PROPER NOTICE AS REQUIRED BY SECTION 10.03.00 OF THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE ON THE PARCEL COVERED IN PETITION NUMBER Z.olq�ob/e<oZo%CPSS-2o2o�; d-- zo/goon/foao / \ lQk) Lc /l clj �r Lii GN TURE OF APPLICANT OR AGENT STREET OR P.O. BOX NAME (TYPED OR PRINTED) STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER 'G /fs CIT , STATE ZIP The foregoing instrument was sworn to and subscribed before me this SO4' day of Q&Itl J , 20.Xj_, by �artiri ck wnaSSe , personally known to me or who produced as identification and who did/did not take an oath. My Commission Expires: (Stamp with serial number) KAYLABENSON Notary Public - State of Florida commission : GG 911199 My comm. Expires Sep 9, 2023 of Nol m Public Name of Notary Public Rev. 3/4/2015 'OT€NT#AL f1 Radevo:lopment ' :=. �• c-. q .«wry:: �_.�:�'� . �,�� _� '_ �J, ... ` .�- t-'. 4 `'rye ��; � ' - �ti . i - .•� 1Y.=..�R' iL y r ize,� t (. _ _ •� ., + �- ••fie ,Ly . . q, i79Sr� NOTICE OF: PUBLIC FEARING NOTICE ?F.-INTENT TO CONSIDER ORDINANCES. Notice is hereby given:that a public heating will be held by the Collier County Board of County Commissioners on September 14, 2021, in the Board of County Commissioners Meeting Room, ThitdFloor, Collier Ooverninent Center, 3299 East Tamiattii Trail, Naples,, FL, to consider the enactment of two County Ordinances. The meeting will commence at 9:00 The title of the proposed Ordinances are as follows: AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AMENDING ORDINANCE No. 8945, AS AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR THE UN- INCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, SPECIFICALLY AMENDING THE FUTURE LAND USE ELEM*NT AND MAP SERIES BY ADDING THE.IMMOKALEE ROAD INTERCHANGE RESIDENTLAL INFELL SUB- DISTRICT TO THE URBAN, MIXED USE DISTRICT TO ALLOW DEVELOPMENT OF UP TO 234 MULTI -FAMILY RENTAL UNITS, OF WHICH 70 WILL BE RENT RESTRICTED AS AFFORDABLE. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF IMMOKALEE.ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 1000 FEET WEST OF JULIET BOU- LEVARD, IN SECTION 30, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, CONSISTING " OF 9.35t ACRES; AND FURTHERMORE, DIRECTING TRANSMITTAL OF THE ADOPTED AMENDMENT TO THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABH3TY AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. [PL201900016201 AND AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 2004-41, AS AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, WHICH ESTABLISHED THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COL- LIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BY AMENDING THE APPROPRIATE ZONING ATLAS MAP OR MAPS BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY FROM AN AGRICULTURAL (A) ZONING DISTRICT TO A RESIDENTIAL PLANNED .UNIT DEVELOPMENT (RPUD) ZONING DISTRICT FOR THE PROJECT TO BE KNOWN AS BLUE CORAL APARTMENTS RPUD, TO ALLOW DEVELOPMENT OF UP TO 234 MULTI -FAMILY RENTAL UNITS, OF WHICH 70 WILL BE RENT RESTRICTED AS AFFORDABLE. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF IMMOKALEE ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 1000 FEET WEST OF JULIET BOULEVARD, IN SECTION 30, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, CONSISTING OF 9.35t ACRES; AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. [PL201900016001 �. _ \ h { } .:._._....._.�...,.—.._...._._..____ Immokalee RD Z t......._....._. �� ; Project j ! Location Copies of the proposed Ordinances are on file with the Clerk io the Board and are available for inspection. All interested parties are invited to attend and be heard. NOTE: All persons wishing to speak on any agenda itemmust register with the County manager prior to presentation of the agenda item to be addressed. Individual speakers will be limited to 3 thinutes on any item. The selection of any individual to speak on behalf of an organization or group is encouraged. If recognized by the Chairman, a spokesperson for a group or organization may be allotted 10 minutes to speak on an item. Persons wishing to have written or graphic materials included in the Board agenda packets must submit said material a minimum of 3 weeks prior to the respective public heating. In any case, written materials intended to be considered by the Board shall be submitted to the appropriate County staff a minimum of seven days prior to the public hearing. All materials used in presentations before the Board will become a permanent part ofthe record. As part of an ongoing initiative to promote social distancing during the COVID-19 pandemic, the public will have the opportunity to provide public comments remotely, as well as in person, during this proceeding. Individuals who would like to participate remotely, should register any time after the agenda is posted on the County website which is 6 days before the meeting through the link provided on the front page of the County website at www colliercountyfi.em Individuals who register will receive an email in advance of the public hearing detailing how they can participate remotely in this meeting. For additional information about the meeting, please call Geoffrey VVdlig at 252-8369 or email to Qegff Willi& colliercountvfl.¢ov. Any person who decides to appeal any decision of the Board will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto and therefore, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is based. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Division, located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 101, Naples, FL 34112-5356, (239) 252-8380, at least two days prior to the meeting. Assisted listening devices for the heating impaired are available in the Board of County Commissioners Office. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA PENNY TAYLOR, CHAIRMAN CRYSTAL K. KINZEL, CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT & COMPTROLLER By: Ann Jennejohn Deputy Clerk (SEAL) N�a0711616-o, a y C tv t M CL Q i O U N M m O O O O O O O T" O (L 0 0 0 0 Packet Pg. 90 9.A.j THIS INSTRUMENT PREPARED BY AND RETURN TO: II II I1 [l MUTUAL GRANT OF EASEMENT AND SHARED ACCESS THIS MUTUAL GRANT OF EASEMENT AND SHARED ACCESS ("Easement") is made this day of , 2021, by and between William C. Scherer, as Trustee of the William C. Scherer Trust u/a/d May 5, 1994, as amended and restated on June 17, 2015 ("Scherer"), whose address is c/o Excel Real Estate, 2375 N. Tamiami Trail #206, Naples, FL 34103 ("Scherer"), and JAZ Automotive Properties, LLC, an Ohio limited liability company authorized to do business in the State of Florida, whose address is 4250 Morse Crossing, Columbus, OH 43219 ("JAZ"). BACKGROUND A. SCHERER is the owner of the real property described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof by reference (the "SCHERER Property"). JAZ is the owner of the real property more particularly described in Exhibit "B" attached hereto and made a part hereof by reference (the "JAZ Property"). B. In connection with Collier County Ordinance 2020-032 , SCHERER and JAZ desire to grant to each other the right, but not the obligation, to construct a shared access drive over a portion of the SCHERER Property and the JAZ Property, as more particularly described on Exhibit "C" (the "Easement Area") and in connection therewith mutually grant a perpetual, non-exclusive easement to the other for ingress and egress, as well as for construction, installation and maintenance of roads, sidewalks, median landscaping, over, under and across the Easement Area located on their respective property. C. SCHERER and JAZ execute this document to evidence their agreement with respect to the Easement. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the covenants and conditions hereinafter set forth, SCHERER and JAZ hereby grant, set over, convey and deliver to the other party, its successors and assigns, a perpetual, non-exclusive easement in, under, upon, about, over and through the Easement Area, located on their respective property, for vehicular and pedestrian ingress, egress, access, as well as construction, installation and maintenance of roads, sidewalks, and landscaping, substantially in compliance with the Access Road Sketch attached as Exhibit "D". This Easement is given for the purpose of allowing SCHERER and JAZ the right to construct, use and maintain a permanent access drive, together with any sidewalks, median landscaping and other improvements within the Easement Area as may be reasonably necessary or desirable for purposes of ingress and egress to and from the SCHERER Property and the JAZ Property as depicted on Exhibit "D" (collectively the "Improvements"). Page I of I 1 Packet Pg. 91 9.A.j The Easement shall exist on the following terms and conditions: 1. Based on the status of development approvals for both parties, it is likely that JAZ will need the Improvements before SCHERER. Accordingly, JAZ shall take responsibility for the design, construction and permitting of the Improvements. The existing lanes on Immokalee Road will need to be reconfigured to align with the new median opening and will be generally constructed in conformance with Exhibit "D", which work will be undertaken by JAZ within the Immokalee Road right of way. Notwithstanding the foregoing, SCHERER shall be entitled to construct the Improvements, as shown in Exhibit "D", within the Easement Area if they are not undertaken by JAZ. Regardless of the party constructing the Improvements, all such work shall be designed, permitted, and constructed in compliance with applicable governmental ordinances, codes and regulations (collectively the "Codes"). SCHERER agrees to reimburse JAZ for fifty percent (50%) of all costs incurred therewith if JAZ constructs the Improvements, including hard costs and soft costs. Conversely, JAZ agrees that it shall reimburse SCHERER fifty percent (50%) of all costs incurred therewith if SCHERER were to construct the Improvements. Such costs shall be reimbursed within thirty (30) days after the date of the notice which shall include copies of paid invoices and a certificate of completion sent from the party that constructs such Improvements (the "constructing party") to the other party. Estimated costs for the Improvements are set forth on attached Exhibit "E". Notwithstanding the foregoing, the party which does not construct the Improvements (the "non -constructing party") shall only be liable to the constructing party for one-half of the total cost of such Improvements if they had been constructed to the minimum Codes requirements. If either party wishes to construct improvements which are above and beyond such requirements, such party shall be liable for 100% of any excess costs above the Codes requirements unless the parties mutually agree otherwise. Further, any on -going maintenance of such above and beyond improvements shall be 100% the responsibility of the party who installs and/or constructs such above and beyond improvements. 2. Any construction by either SCHERER or JAZ shall be performed by licensed contractor(s) who will provide to the non -constructing party with evidence of insurance prior to and as a condition of the commencement of any construction. The non -constructing party shall be named as additional insured. Such insurance shall be issued by an insurance company rated A- or better by A.M. Best, as follows: (a) commercial liability - $1,000,000 each occurrence, $2,000,000 general aggregate, (b) workers' compensation in amounts required by applicable law, (c) automobile liability - $1,000,000 per accident, and (d) employer's liability - $1,000,000 each accident, $1,000,000 each employee. Copies of all permit applications and the contractor's estimate of the cost for work within the Easement Area shall be provided to the non -constructing party prior to submittal of the permit applications. SCHERER and JAZ covenant to the other that no mechanic or construction lien shall be placed on the part of the Easement Area owned by the non -constructing party related to the construction of the Improvements depicted on Exhibit D. In the event such a mechanic or construction lien is recorded on the property owned by the non - constructing party, the constructing party shall within fifteen (15) days of recording transfer the lien to a bond or other security to remove the mechanic or construction lien from the property, failing which, the non -constructing party may act to remove the mechanic or construction lien from its property, and seek to collect all sums paid in connection therewith from the constructing party and, in connection therewith, exercise its rights under Section 6 below. In the event that the non -constructing party receives any notices of any violations occurring in connection with the construction of the Improvements, whether such notices are received from any public or private source, the non -constructing party shall forward copies of same to the constructing party which shall have thirty (30) days from receipt of same to cure such violations, failing which the non - constructing party shall have the right to correct such violations and to recover the costs thereof from the constructing party, including, but not limited to, costs of enforcement, fines and penalties Page 2 of 11 Packet Pg. 92 9.A.j and administration. Prior to the commencement of construction of the Improvements and at all times thereafter, SCHERER and JAZ shall each maintain in full force and effect, comprehensive public liability insurance, written by a company rated A- or better by A.M. Best and insuring against the risks of bodily injury, death, and property damage or loss occurring within or as a result of the use of the Easement Area by SCHERER, JAZ and their employees, contract parties, customers, agents and invitees, with a minimum single limit of not less than $2,000,000 per occurrence, coverage to be in a comprehensive general liability form. The foregoing coverage requirements may be provided by a combination of comprehensive general liability and umbrella policy provided that at all times not less than $2,000,000 per occurrence is available. Both policies shall provide that such policy may not be cancelled or modified without at least thirty (30) days prior written notice to the other party. SCHERER and JAZ shall provide the other party, on or before the effective date of the policy, a certificate evidencing the insurance required hereunder and stating that such insurance is in full force and effect, that the premiums therefore have been paid and that the other party and its mortgagee on the Easement Area have been named as insured parties. 3. The parties acknowledge and agree that they shall share equally in the maintenance and repair of the Easement Area, and that the Easement Area shall at all times be kept in good condition and repair. If either party performs any maintenance of the Easement Area, the performing party shall deliver an invoice to the non -performing party setting forth all costs and expenses incurred in performing such work, including hard and soft costs, together with copies of paid invoices from any third party suppliers or contractors evidencing the same, and the non- performing party shall reimburse the performing party for fifty percent (50%) of the costs and expenses within thirty (30) days after receipt of such invoice from the performing party. 4. No party may block, remove, reconfigure or otherwise materially alter the Easement Area or the access road constructed thereon without the other party's prior written consent. Provided, however, that nothing herein shall prevent either party from connecting internal sidewalks, drives and/or roadways on their respective property to the access road constructed within the Easement Area at their own expense. The Easement Area shall at all times be used in a legal manner and in compliance with all applicable laws and ordinances. 5. Each party shall indemnify and hold the other party harmless from and against any claims, suits, costs, expenses and other liabilities arising out of each party's use of the Easement Area by itself, or by its tenants, employees, customers, agents or other invitees, or otherwise arising out of any violation of this Agreement. 6. In the event that SCHERER or JAZ shall fail to timely pay or reimburse ("Owing Party") the other party any amount due under this Easement ("Owed Party"), then interest shall accrue on the unpaid amount at the maximum rate permitted by law, and Owed Party may record a claim of lien against the Owing Party's property to secure the obligation of Owing Party to pay such amount to Owed Party. The lien evidenced by such claim of lien shall be effective upon, and shall arise only from and after, the recording of such claim of lien in the Public Records of Collier County, Florida. Such claim of lien may be foreclosed in the same manner as the foreclosure of a mortgage encumbering real property. Such claim of lien may be transferred to security by the Owing Party in accordance with the procedures set forth in Florida Statute Chapter 713. Page 3 of I 1 Packet Pg. 93 9.A.j 7. This Easement shall be recorded in the Public Records of Collier County, Florida. The rights and obligations created hereunder shall run with the properties described herein and shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of each party and its successors and assigns, and upon any and all subsequent owners of the SCHERER Property and JAZ Property, or any portion thereof. For the avoidance of doubt, the right to construct the Improvements within the Easement Area as set forth herein may be exercisable by any successor owner(s) of the SCHERER Property and/or JAZ Property, and the obligation to reimburse the party undertaking such construction shall accrue to the then owner of the SCHERER Property and JAZ Property not undertaking such construction at the time of such construction. 8. The Easement shall not be deemed a dedication of the Easement Area to the general public. A right turn lane across the frontage of the Scherer Property will be required by Collier County for the development of the Easement Area. However, additional easements have been identified on the PUD master plan for the Scherer Property including a 15 foot road right of way easement. Scherer agrees to grant such easement to Collier County to allow construction of the Easement Area concurrently with the permitting of the improvement of the Easement Area. Miscellaneous. (a) Any notice, demand, request or communication required or permitted hereunder shall be in writing and sent by hand delivery, United States certified mail, postage prepaid, or by recognized overnight delivery service, addressed to the parties addresses provided for herein or to such other address or to the attention of such other person as hereafter shall be designated in writing by the parties sent in accordance herewith. Any such notice, demand, request or communication shall be deemed to have been given as of the date of receipt or refusal at the address, and in the manner, provided herein. (b) When the context in which words are used in this Easement indicates that such is the intent, words in the singular number shall include the plural and vice versa, and the words in masculine gender shall include the feminine and neuter genders and vice versa. (c) In the event that any provision of this Easement shall be held to be invalid, the same shall not affect in any respect whatsoever the validity of the remaining provisions of this Easement. (d) This Easement contains the entire understanding and agreement between the parties and supersedes any prior written or oral agreements between them respecting the subject matter contained herein. There are no representations, agreements, arrangements or understandings, oral or written, between and among the parties relating to the subject matter of this Easement that are not fully expressed herein. (e) The failure of any party hereto to insist upon strict performance of any of the servitudes, easements, privileges, rights, covenants, agreements, terms and conditions hereunder, irrespective of the length of time for which such failure continues, shall not be a waiver of any of such party's rights. No consent or waiver, express or implied, to or of any breach or default in the performance of any obligation hereunder shall constitute a consent or waiver to or of any other breach or default in the performance of the same or any obligation hereunder. (f) This Easement may be changed, modified or amended only by an instrument in writing duly executed and acknowledged by the parties. Page 4 of 11 Packet Pg. 94 ((111) This Easement is made and shall be governed by and construed according to the laws of [lie State of Florida. VCrll-le for any litigation Aa arising g Out of this reement shall lie — exetusivelv in a court of appropriate jurisdiction in Collier County, Florida. , and in no other venue or forum. (11) This Easement niay be CNCCUtCd III UIIV 1ILL1116CI (-)fcounterparts With the same effect as if the parties had signed the sarne document. All such counterparts shall be construed Z:! together and shall constitute one instrument. Z- IN WITNESS WHEREOF. the parties have hereunto set its hand and seal this —day of .20211. SCHERER: V William Q, Scherer. as Trustee of the William C. Scherer Trust u/a d May 5, 1994, as amended and restated on June 17. 2015 Witness STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me by means of physical presence this A day ofil 2021, by Williarn C. Scherer, as Trustee of the William C. Scherer u. a d MalI ' er y 5� 094, as amended and restated on June 17, 2015. who 'is personall-y known to me OR produced as !\`Otat Printed Marne of Notary Public "'i 4, Cojurnission E.xp Ire s: Page 5 of I I Packet Pg. 95 9.A.j JAZ: Flavio Galasso, opc JAZ Automotivstill -e I l Wrti�ess Name: J�,) r'', . An Ohio limited liabil —� a,: Witness Name: h o �11}' STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER l7f"opcmt#)nS r )4/(& es, LLC ; company 1.. I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me by means of physical presence this I{��`" day of 0!qO a� 2021, by l v+u `�c, i- as I?-&i"+tof JAZ Automotive Properties, LLC an Ohio limited liability company, on behalf of the compnay, who V'is personally known to me OR _ produced as identification. Notary Public of Florida (Molar"y eal) Printed Name of Notary Pub ` UENYOUNG My Commission Expires: MY COMMISSION # HH 056452 EXPIRES: October 31, 2024 ''•'F o`r v�?*' Banded thru Notary Public Underwdters Page 6 of I I Packet Pg. 96 EXHIBIT "A" SCHERER PROPERTY Page 7 of 11 0 0 0 N N N V V a r 0 L 0 yr E U) m W d i _LM d E t ci yr a Packet Pg. 97 9.A.j NtMDX I , I 1 !¢! s 02ro599' a 1194.e3' w� VL & i I I i l N 02ro543' W 1184.80' III o ZW . I jm, Ig Ic st! IIII � •- s E" ytVltiGSfON ROAD y eR �8 w ill KOM � g 7 eF t ill i m e ¢ g� ��llii�ill s.ii........... 9�,6 e.... mill :isii,#....:.ci;�'la�t9a�i�`"°'ik� •�•,•li�l�x9*11 ! �8�nieili 41��ii9.'i�:��e " Packet Pg. 98 EXHIBIT "B" JAZ PROPERTY Page 8 of I 1 0 0 0 N N N V V a r 0 L 0 yr E U) m W d i _LM d E t ci yr a Packet Pg. 99 9.A.j $ s' Asp j. pmh AMR,sa g( it dam- Alf` < €a� " � CEMORAM $� pi x , i d� a NCH rc .m 9E "3 - .. - N m i E>812 : A i. V. 5 V5�n� p p J Y Packet Pg. 100 EXHIBIT "C" EASEMENT AREA Legal Description of Easement Area on SCHERER Property Legal Description of Easement Area on JAZ Property Page 9 of l l Packet Pg. 1 1771 9.A.j G I o v° v u o S n '� a ° g$e G! ■ 1 & g U V) 0i 0 , . � to Un o UJ W ; 0 a n F O ■■■ s e z p��33ii ■uu■ . ■■■■■■o■ � Q � o o = a ■uu■■■■ 6. � O Q Y W O i W�m 1 O C 0-1 d O Q a a O o a U W 00 O J O J p A cn V) ° a o ` LO00 F-- W m N d- Z w a i w ON W m0 o ( O a °- z I o Y ow I da 0- 0) 0F= a i� o W (D LL o0 _ I oQ I HY Wo 3 zY WO 00 <Q CL m LUa w I V)I O- a o I w00 O b JU I m Q v IO O N I S 02'05'17E 0 0 150.10' F CD �1-4l L3 --1 0 �5U. z C I H w_ _ _ (n U .- w Cr- w Z+i �No��nm000 W Z� W W I W V ^ �lo00 rD tou') � o0 7a _ v)1(]N�r7 Q LLI J O w O 0 Q 00 I ¢ W d Q Q O �W N� � H w3333w m� r= �w N W o m ,_ w w z ID Z Q I U U ~ 2 N N d O Q W Y U V) W womcorlow z rnp w w0 a y, J6olnor)0LO a N z? O m0000 N000 F-- Q~ �Z CJ O I U) m WZZZZN w Oa Ow J O I Q Z 0 0 W C)m O �J� w U� 00 O 00 -� �JJ J JJ� OU' I o�tn �' cn a z as o 0 a it II Z (n Z_ w K V m C w W < 00 o m0 as I N M Packet Pg. 102 9.A.j em u`*°, G.i. V O L 7400 Trail Blvd,, Suite 200 Nc pl s, FL 341108 PH: (239) 597 '31 1 1 LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF AN ACCESS EASEMENT ALL THAT PART OF THOSE LANDS AS DESCRIBED IN O.R. BOOK 5460, PG. 132, PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LANDS, SAID POINT ALSO BEING ON THE NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF IMMOKALEE ROAD; THENCE S 02005'17" E ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID LANDS A DISTANCE OF 15 0. 10 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE PARCEL HEREIN BEING DESCRIBED; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID EAST LINE S 02005' 17" E A DISTANCE OF 140.71 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID EAST LINE N 89059'50" W A DISTANCE OF 30.13 FEET; THENCE N 02006'48" W A DISTANCE OF 58.51 FEET; THENCE N 12037'29" W A DISTANCE OF 26.99 FEET; THENCE N 02005'11" W A DISTANCE OF 55.85 FEET; THENCE S 89058'44" E A DISTANCE OF 35.09 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE PARCEL HEREIN DESCRIBED. CONTAINING A TOTAL AREA OF APPROXIMATELY 0.11 ACRES. REFERENCE ABB DRAWING #12461-SD2 PAGE 1 OF 1 Packet Pg. 103 9.A.j O O C U OS Q N 4 O II � a 34 9 n O U S� N I = .a o if) fn c a a wui W Z Q o iW�uiii = O % ■oum■ $ u�ouu 1- M c urA�rAv�� I Q � � ° = a ■ouu�■ < C) Y W Cr m W I m 0- Q In _I Q Q. Cr d (, W I I V Lo U J Q � o w -� A -O O W W ZON C Ot�O^ O O to In ra ~ nncq COO00 M O d W Ul) F I O WU) ^ O CL 2 U. I ^ N En oo On _j ww3w33 w a O m m o¢ a 0a i- �� z�M0 w w ZY N ~O Jm 000000000o Ow _ wV �m r)(f)(n nzz p 3 rn ¢ O 1 V) N I O I 0: �� V Z) O J Qv wLQ wa O JJ O N a m L4 ui S 02'05'17 E J L6FE J' a _ o 150.10' F _ _ J 0 z I- o w WM O V) w �N Of LLJw N w zo 0 I W U- I F- :� Q 0 Y W m� O �w W p v W m Z zQ U o ¢ w m i Y in z En Z z w Y Q z I Lj m w a � ai w w z N 26 a Oo o a 0 w oU 0 0 o as o 0a n n z in z z k' ci am w QMw�oo o mw as N ri Packet Pg. 104 9.A.j 19104011 4 'A''W'dr-50BARBER M [['�j �,,q gg��',^ w ,:d.�.$. .i. DAGE. l INC. 7400 Trail Blvd., Suite 200 Maples, Ft. 34 108 PH(239) 597 31 1 1 LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF AN ACCESS EASEMENT ALL THAT PART OF THOSE LANDS AS DESCRIBED IN O.R. BOOK 5696, PG. 1480, PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID LANDS, SAID POINT ALSO BEING ON THE NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF IMMOKALEE ROAD; THENCE S 02005' 17" E ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID LANDS A DISTANCE OF 150.10 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE PARCEL HEREIN BEING DESCRIBED; THENCE LEAVING SAID WEST LINE S 89058'44" E A DISTANCE OF 34.96 FEET; THENCE S 02005'11" E A DISTANCE OF 53.28 FEET; THENCE S 08044'44" W A DISTANCE OF 26.94 FEET; THENCE S 02013'39" E A DISTANCE OF 60.78 FEET; THENCE N 89059'50" W A DISTANCE OF 30.03 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH SAID WEST LINE; THENCE N 02005' 17" W ALONG SAID WEST LINE A DISTANCE OF 140.71 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE PARCEL HEREIN DESCRIBED. CONTAINING A TOTAL AREA OF APPROXIMATELY 0.10 ACRES. REFERENCE ABB DRAWING #12461 -SD I PAGE 2 OF 2 Packet Pg. 105 EXHIBIT "D" ACCESS ROAD SKETCH FOR EASEMENT AREA Page 10 of 11 0 0 0 N N N V V a r 0 L 0 yr E 0 U) m W d i _LM d E t ci yr a Packet Pg. 1 6 9.A.j mms-MA GNOLI mmmmmmmam- momom ARBER & .......BRUNDAGE, uvc. mma'Amm- vWa'Amm- .^ SCALE: 3" - 70' GERMAIN IMMOKALEE & BLUE CORAL APARTMENTS SHARED ACCESS ME \ 1 \ 1 1 1 I 1 t 1 I I t 1 I I i I'o 1 I 1 1 i 1 I 1 1 Packet Pg. 107 EXHIBIT E Estimate of Costs Page 11 of 11 Packet Pg. 108 9.A.j GNOLI Professional Engineers, planners, Surveyors Lac Landscape Architects Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Preliminary Pre -Design Lexus Cross Easement ABB Project: 18-0011 Date: January 19, 2021 DESCRIPTION AMOUNT ON SITE Facilities $3,000 Roadway $32,175 Drainage/ Stormwater $18,750 ;subtotal., n $53,925 RIGHT TURN LANE Facilities $45,000 Roadway $29,000 Drainage/ Stormwater $17,250 IMMOKALEE ROAD MEDIAN Facilities $7,000 Roadway $27,375 Subtotal ;; �jA_s�.w Pretotal: $179,550 Design/ Permitting/ CEI $26,933 Mobilization/ Demobilization $17,955 Contingency $26,933 TOTAL. $251,370 Notes: This Opinion of Probable Cost (OPC) has been prepared by Agnoli, Barber & Brundage, Inc. (ABB) at the request of the owner or as a requirement of governmental agency. ABB has based the unit costs of this OPC on previous work history with similar projects or on values provided by reputable contractors we have worked with in accordance with F.A.C. 61G-1518.011, this is not a guarantee or warranty expressed or implied as to the construction cost that may be obtained by owner using competitive bidding. If such a guarantee is needed, it is recommended that owner procure the services of a professional cost estimator or obtain a binding bid from a contractor. Packet Pg. 109 9.A.j Lexus Cross Easement Engineers Opinion of Probable Construction Cost 1 / 19/2021 FACILITIES COMPONENTS QUANTITY UNITS UNIT COST COST Landscape and Irrigation 1 LS $ 3,000 $ 3,000 Subtotal: 3,000 ROADWAY Concrete S/W 150 LF $ 15 $ 2,250 1-1/2" Asphalt 670 Sy $ 12 $ 8,040 6" Lime Rock Sub -Base 670 Sy $ 10.5 $ 7,035 12" Sub -Grade Stabilization 670 Sy $ 2 $ 1,340 Curb & Gutter 250 LF $ 20 $ 5,000 Lighting Road 250 LF $ 18 $ 4,500 Earthwork/ Fill 670 Cy $ 3.0 $ 2,010 Sign and Stripe 1 LS $ 2,000 $ 2,000 Subtotal: 32,175 DRAINAGE / STORMWATER Catch Basins 2 EA $ 6,000 $ 12,000 18" RCP 150 LF $ 45 $ 6,750 Subtotal: $ 18,750 TOTAL: $ 53,925 r FACILITIES COMPONENTS QUANTITY UNITS UNIT COST COST Landscape and Irrigation 1 LS $ 15,000 $ 15,000 Power Line Relocation 3 EA $ 10,000 $ 30,000 Subtotal: $ 45,000 ROADWAY Concrete S/W 250 1 LF $ 15 1 $ 3,750 1-1/2" Asphalt 500 1 SY 1 $ 12 1 $ 6,000 Packet Pg. 110 9.A.j 6" Lime Rock Sub -Base 500 SY $ 10.5 $ 5,250 12" Sub -Grade Stabilization 500 SY $ 2 $ 1,000 Curb & Gutter 250 LF $ 20 $ 5,000 Lighting Road 250 LF $ 18 $ 4,500 Earthwork/ Fill 500 Cy $ 3.0 $ 1,500 Sign and Stripe 1 LS $ 2,000 $ 2,000 Subtotal: $ 29,000 DRAINAGE ! STORMWATER Catch Basins 1 EA $ 6,000 $ 6,000 18" RCP 250 LF $ 45 $ 11,250 Subtotal: $ 17250 TOTAL: $ 91,250 FACILITIES COMPONENTS QUANTITY UNITS UNIT COST COST Landscape and Irrigation 1 LS $ 7,000 $ 7,000 Subtotal: $ 7,000 ROADWAY 1-1/2" Asphalt 450 SY $ 12 $ 5,400 6" Lime Rock Sub -Base 450 SY $ 10.5 $ 4,725 12" Sub -Grade Stabilization 450 SY $ 2 $ 900 Curb & Gutter 250 LF $ 20 $ 5,000 Earthwork/ Fill 450 Cy $ 3.0 $ 1,350 Sign and Stripe 1 LS $ 10,000 $ 10,000 Subtotal: i $ 27,375 TOTAL: ' $ 34,375 0 IL a c d E a a L O U d m 0 0 co 0 0 0 as 0 N J a. 0 m 0 0 N N N as a 0 L O C E d W d a �_ CO C E t V Q Packet Pg. 111 ACOe.TC0141"Ityy 9.A.1 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliercountyk1gov 00 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE APLE , FLORIDA 34104 (3) 5 - 400 FAIL: (z ) -6 5 Hybrid Virtual Quasi -Judicial Public Hearing Waiver Emergency Executive Order 202NIM Hearing of the Collier County Planning Commission and Board of County Commissioners For Petition Number{s}: / 07�/Ile- Regarding the above subject petition number(s), e6 f le .Ivare o Applicant) elects to proceed during the declared emergency with hybrid virtual public hearings of the Collier County Planning Commission and Board of Counter Com m issioners, and waives the right to contest any procedural irregularity due to the hybrid virtual nature of the public hearing. Name; Signature'*: Y'Applicant ❑ Legal Counsel to Applicant [date: * This form must be signed by either the Appiicant (if the applicant is a corporate entity, this must be an officer of the corporate entity) or the legal counsel to the Applicant. Packet Pg. 112 MoscaMichele From: Diane Doherty <dianedoherty@me.com> Sent. Monday, May 10, 2021 2:36 PM To: MoscaMichele; MedinaJosephine Cc: Linda Durkee Subject: Petition Opposing Blue Coral Developmentt EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Attachment available until Jun 9, 2021 Dear Ms. Mosca and Ms. Medina, Please find attached several petitions from the residents of Bermuda Palms of Naples Condominium Association, Inc. opposing the following: (1) We oppose the use of Bermuda Palms for ingress and/or egress by Blue Coral Apartments or any other entity, including Germain Lexus, and for any other purpose, and (2) We oppose the approval of Blue Coral Apartments unless its proposed size of up to 280 units is reduced by at least 50 percent. These petitions are being submitted today, May 10, to meet the deadline for inclusion in the packet of materials to go to the Commissioners. Click to Download Scan 23.pdf 24.6 M B Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me by email: dianedoherty@me.com or by mobile: 240-381- 4310. Sincerely yours, Diane M, Doherty President, Board of Directors ��d n C*.,�� i!4 `'(T•i H7'J ��' 1 •- 4 i ?•^ i-° m, i�7u+ID �r� T, �+3[ll�€?�Ik!»ljAssociation, `3G PQn; � i�zY m Arm], �4�dlaB � ' ��? lSri�tY Q�a`��Z��^?E'�ftQ�js►Uf;;��p a�i�� ;�:�43n�i'� o� t�1@ ��J'i7��r�'� L�� c�Pi#y dtveiOpmenx u uuH�s?He) i�T4 "a-plus,FL hevu ea vq L _ i y „ 7��o �i�tai3 Rh eUr%;=� bY €ate V:rra! Apretments or any other entity, including Germain st leuzo and for any ether purpose, v,Fa o 2) 'd � 81119cOOOR the apprOVai of Blue Coral Apnrtmev� , uniec,; �•��;�ze�e ,,�o �� dud by at feast 50 percrant, L 7 ne, P11) MAI d Deb Swinderman F . Bermuda Palms Petition May ti, 2027 at B-jo=*!j PM Dlane Doherty , _ r � O C�0000l=O OD �®■ ■/{,may �e i'I \`��:.J G(-��CJ C�C �,��o �G�c� FacG�,c <anna16anna(@vahoo.com> b,ecto Rea B ��[ ��' a ims I4etition �i D (@ab lityteam.com <Deb@bilityteam.com> Anna and Frank Fichera 1935 Sandra Bay Drive [eaples Florida 34109 ®n Ulledrtesday, iUlay 5, 2021, 03:38:24 l�it�d �4� �, Bermuda i�aln�d o•► ��lai;�8es �ondorriiniurn f-ssc�c, lrac - l�r�b Svuinderrnan <deb@abilityteam.com> wrote: Ne1io again I just realized that some of you may not have the ability to sign the attached petition, and scan back to nee. I will accept an email with your address and unit number in lieu of a signature, sorry for the inconvenience. �e17 Sw�der�nan CAl�/t Ability Management Inc. 6736 Lone Oak Blvd Naples. FL 34109 239-5914200 rt U1 "Ulm Toz C�ai#ipe 6�ounty Planning Commission Front Bermuda; Penns of Maples Condominium Association, Inc. Re: +�pposiOOn to Blue Coral Apartm+enn Onto% May 51 2021 We the undo rsagned, as owners %F the Bermuda Palms condo development on Iramokslee ilOOd in Naples, FL, hereby express our opposition to the proposed Blue €oral Apartments on lmmokal+ee Road asfollows& �1� t�fa o�+pe�se the use sf 8erenyda Palms fs�r Ingress +endlor egress by Slue Coral Apartments or any other entity, including Germain Lexas, and for any other purpose, and; (�) Wn oppose the approval of Blue Coral Apartments unless its proposed size of up to Zee units is reduced by at leant So percent. • r�+.+�� ram; - Mane - President, go, vri of hectors Owners Please F))a we Deb Swinderm an Fwd: Petition flay° at,: :28*�48 P Diane Dohel"'ILV ll�NJ,NjoM 8u mmmmmm=== ��= �c�lqo crL�u LI- T cn�2�� G�a �lrasmussen2102@gn�ail.coma Subject* Petite ou rn r0000 <Deb.@abilitvteam.com> �oc�c� ��r�eng Debi oIs as Vo�iQ rivIso olaf an�r ►�aure�� ,�=,,�,t�� Noeples, FL Ull oQ G ��:,�;+E': �',; ;�A1.1+jF.4 9.;r �`.=+k'L�� 4iNP7�#�@i�titl�! �'?�ii�•,:�r'. ;s, �..,;I.y. 'AMITY MANAGEMENI e+ih`,FIM FL 34105 4-'.�, k;. .,;- I. �s� 6�Jir—.S�t'+. _ 't.`:f�+k'�•��Y_eii rythl =fttrius►sr6.�n�i�fln,:'��. MI 171F_ t�� i�h•�.•Ga, r, rT,p�t ;fir GLir?�r:. n� :%:f $e fi�il'v�7R #�i�Pig:� t'p!r�"it'1C1 Clef`R1+!'r9J31�+�1ii cif t�r;t-i ,Rio! r+,_+:` , ?i, 1if4�31'i, iees: ?5 =Jipf t3il our aPPaSfti •r � s►� L� L rL . :rat %k , x, =: ;c ,; 491%4?kute Road its fcr"w!s: z ,.er" wrftitt`s, on'71 tsrrllmq GAr1naitF aft,sr.} :91 ia wvj�ic it_ a n;,- ;:..rCS rt;J' 3i .'_' l*ii'L3iSiT� *iYS.TltYPpe�tl3r fet l+hdl!�t ?Q 1!51'z+4'iFL. j` Ll ..� r'4 A,u: 7�_, f�'. �r..�l, �• rl`I ;.�': f, :. F e i t ,:?. r�'r' FWa Bermuda rcu S Petition May 67 2021 at 4.34 PM Diane Dohenj G�tcHCAIil.UOUDRL;��) Thursday, May 6, 2021 4&32 PM roan Dsb abilityr�eatiI.cc rn o sc o Re: Bermuda Palms Peiition I �hn�er�'�ly c��)© the inrenl ers [�Y� usi�ono1ry Dr. Tlil� read i Iready congest, cand adding an additional 2+00+ snits with tl blue coral ape Kmenis will (�scorne an absolula nightmare, cgeitin� gut �fi �anc�r� �� Dri�f�. U the vsry A ni[nnucii G would suggest t6iat tfie proposed &glLie coral ccapa rtments be [remauced y @ minimum of 5 %m P�triGi� �OCYleCO '96 5 Sandra Bay Dr. Apt 202, Naples Fl. 34109 Bermuda balms o>r INaKiles Cc�nclominiurn Assonc, Inc - Deb qv,%,�jinderma.n Qeb@abilitytea,m.com> ��02o Wednesday, May 5, 2021 3:34 PM ran. Patricia Romero c►laquitaiifj l ghotmall.com> mboaciBermuda Palms Petition l�cll® main I just realized that sonic of you may not have the ability to sign the attached petition, and scan back to nee. 1 will accept an email with your address and tTimt number M' lieu of a signature, sorry for gic mconveivence. Deb S��rin�?ernaan C141�J1 Ability r��geen Inc. 5736 Lone Oak Blvd T�Taples, FL 34109 23 9-5 914200 col6W me e co vicui r that, � wou d rol as pp6 n ve oar le � Cdi K ona rra uIT6c and c�G��os a yid danger of Gisiv ific trhe nay ves4 eats of the Blue Coma, 9 HI�r�C�� yoI10 CG°ous OH rniLia'aaras g 7 �JJ riot 102 0 W: petition May 6, 2021 at 12:16 PM Diane Dohery From: michael devita <michaeldevlta@amnei> Sent: Wednesday, May 5, 2021 3:24 PM To: Deb@abilityteam.com Subject: petition a��a�e�� Acl�� or �p��s C��iiLil�+ilNiUiN A��oc�►TI4N, ��. C/O ABILITY MANAGEMENT 67 36 LONE OAK BLVD. NAPLESr FL 34109 PHONFON 2394914200 Toc Coltinr ';�t�nttr Piann�ing Co�atnitston frowns Psims Of Maples Condominium Association, Inc. Vie; OPP";Wan to Hlue Coral Apartments etc►: May S, 2021 �'e th+s undt-r*jgn+eQ� as o�+►r�rs of tie �lr�u+ds Pains Tondo �Isrn��ip�anl on t>ttneotCrrlar, its�$rt 1rs +Naples, WL, ropy express our opposition tD ttm proposwed Suter Coral p part is On Immokaiss Road as faillawS; 4tlo oFPns+e the use Of Bermuda Patens for ingmzx anWer egress by fir„r Cor,� Apartmrnta or ,+rlr +vti ter +enter, indwding uTRIMin l exers, and for any other purpose, ,and; (2) WH oppose the approval of Blue Coral Apartments unigss its proposes) size of up to 280 units 1s reduced by at least SO percent Mane M, 001% ; Ly Prosi'dent, Ti0*4 of hectors �M►ners Please. �''t dcff. 1S eu' i7Al" �'~9� 5 sSArclDt°R FUrJ. Bermuda Paims Petition May 62 2021 at 12:15 PM Diane Dohery ui ee@aoixong <Ic u`umaj �&a 0.cmti > roo Debar biiitVAKe9m0coill MWG-Ullnu Re: Bermuda Peaims Patin ll Th�nmks. Linda D�Trlcee 4985 Sandra. Bey Drive 0A i�(aples, FL 34109 Linda Message----- �rom: Bermuda Palms of Maples Condominium Assoc, To: Linda C. Durkee ccdurkeeOao[.cam> Sent: Wed, May 5, 2021 3:34 pm Subject: Bermuda Palms Petition ofr Inc - ®eb Swinderman <aehC�abilityteai�.cor;�> � lclloagain I just realized drat some of you MZy not have the ability to sign the aua&iad petition, and. scan back to me. I will accept an email with. your address and unit nurnbcr in lieu of a signatures, sorry for the inconvenience. I�eb �winderman C14I� l�bili�f � �anageffien1: Lnc. 6736Lone Oak, Blvd Naples, FL 34109 �3 9-591-4200 FVV: Bermuda Palms Petition May &, 2021 at 12:15 PM Diane Dohery �f�C Gnu (off " �cdOil' U�Cvi(VLHL c`U�i G�oO.c oFA> �Cfiti�o Wednesda�p, May 52021 413:2 J Phi MAD@)Vito Goo: Borniulcie�i PoAMS Petition 910 cougar cou i unit ,c o4 vehemently entiy ��p c p cl 'o Li him ; evoio pmenL� as it encroaches on Bermuda "alms Inc o Dab SAndernian <Deb(A abiEij[y eamf .corn' `ofiro11 jusE realized that some of you may not have the ability to sign the attached petition, and scan back to me. I will accept an email with yo-LTY address and unit numiber in lieu of a signature, sorry for fie inconWenience. l�eb Swinder�nan �� Ability Iyanabemeni Inc. 0736 Lone Oak Blvd Naples, FL 34109 239-5914200 F-':l '�` { r4"� LR[.. _r aIF arm tf�+lT, a� ►rteJ �!s'fi'. � raif6•�rB p.a, m� as .� yp.ica Y IRw: rN 4Piy': �..Y rY 4r YM r[ we � �r. .fit-. • J... .' II N. :�_ *. 1 �r AV I � � � � 4`-« F1Af: Bermuda Palms Notice of Public Nearing May 6, 2021 at 12:10 PM Diane Dohery �IOO o Ca��bf��1�CLawn.C*6�� 0 acF a Cie: ' e�r�b�� da, '= PAVITS Noi a C0i�'U10IQC G=dC wring el m�° I"$)I *� "U c �Iq � she neighborhood more. c�1s ngeroLis t or T en{i,anis and spe-,Ci aiGy children. F',rj � j uii SSoC, Gnc o Deb S Pvindanwoan <�eb cbabij{Ll �e'�{il.corn> vdr©��. hello �verjio�le 'his is regard, M� a l�T®lice of Phiblic !'Tearing which all owners should have received by ITS Mail on Monday, May 3, 2021, rega�r sing a proposed 280 unit 1,par` nient development Imown as "Blue Coral Apaxt-ments" adjacent to Bermuda, Palms with planned RA fe ingress and egress out of our small community. I have a prepared a petition if any owners wishes to sign it for submission to the Collier County Planning Commission: l . Opposing ingress and egress from Bermud.1a, Teal �. FT, oi©osing that the development be scaled down from the 280 units by at least 50%. TLTnfortunately, time is not i�� our favor as t%e �oission has re��es°red that all Material to be i�zcluded on 'ire agenda pact age be submitted to them10 days prior to I e public eaxgng scheduled for May 20, 2021. If any owner wishes to sign this petition, it must be returned by email to Deb abilityteau: r,, no later that Sunday evening, May 9, 2021 for submission prior to the deadline. please see attac%cd petition and notice of the public l_rleai�l�. thaz�� you • Lone OakBlvd aplcs, FL 34109 FVV: Bermuda Palms Petition N ay 6, 2021 at 12:08 PM Diane Dahery W o adnesc_ip �, May 5, 2021 6:30 PM roo ula) ocRaa Re: Bermuda,Palms ; ondtion 11/da� �?�� I agree �u;:h }�®ur letter and wiBE rote ti�as �a� 910 Cougar kpt 202 4aples, FL i eb Sewinderrnan <d bff abiiitAeam.com> wrote: Mello abai�7 o hanE:s �er�-��ca I��:E�� o� �iap�es Gondorr�lnlur� As��c, Ini✓ � dust realised that some o�yot� �aay mot have the ah�li'�y to si�� the atfa.cl�ed petition, and can bacwill� to me. I w�accept an email with your address and omit nu m1bey hil Ileu of a siailatwe, sorry for the mi convernence. �e� Sv�ii�dermax� (C�1VI Ila / I�viama ement Inc. �736 Lone Oak Blvd Naples, FL 34109 239-59 i -4200 ��r,� 4- ;:�� a��'��f° �. �t ��y �st.t�� ar��tity� i��u�#i:�q ��ts�� sy!''a �lXlib�i�,71L$r ,��1�! E; ��; �� ,�--+�'�+� �� ' ,,��,�� le�� o�� A��e�� u�r��r its .�s��y,��.na�d si.t� y,F �� g �t��t� �� s�rti�ucad asp �t ��ta�t 5p pat'�arat- �, ':. _, >ti -".t ._ f r ,1 �� _ n � !� i � � FU1l: Bermuda Palms Petition May 6, 2021 at 11:48 AM Diane Dohery Thursday, Mcoy CS, 2021 u 1:�.7 AM `r:) an Doia@abilitytsam.com M>>Dcc' o Cie: e6 media Na ms Motion ��muda �alm� 935 Saner Bay DrIm Unity 105 i 4aples, FL 341U109 Thani� yn�a Anita ®eo Swinderman <uerj@abiiit%tt�a-►"i.coi"t > vyrote: H ello again 1 just realized `h t some of you �rrawi nog, l�a�ic the ability to sign tie a��agc1��ed petltlon, and can back to nic_ I will accept an email wi'da your address and unit number RI lien of a signature, sorry for the inconvenience. 3736 Lone Oak Blvd aples, RI, 34109 39�5914200 Fw: Bermuda Palms Petition fray 6, 2021 at 11:46 AM Diane Dohery �f�U6V�i o G�ai 6 �1��=��an�c° �Gof� 6�u.oti� Ulna Thursda r, May 61 2021 6:50 IkM �i©o Inc Dab ewinc�;�e� man S��?6 uid Palms of �� ples C��ndon'Linium Assoc -duo gabilitffoarn.corfl> ,Dubjw,n a. Hv: Bermuda Palms Petition Sent from the all new ArJL app for Android ----- Forwarded Message ----- �rwom: "Bermuda Palms of Naples Condominium Assoc, Inc - Deb Swinderinan" <Deb @abilityteam.com> To: "Kathy Brainerd/Richard DiCapua" <kbrainerci2 C'aol.conj> Cc: Sent: Wed, May 5, 2021 at 3:38 PM �ubjeet: Bermuda Palms Petition Mello again just realized that some of you may not have the abilAy to sig111 the attached peti1don, and scan back to me. f will accept an email with your address and umt number in zieu of a. signature, sor�Ly for the alliconvemence. AhiIYT I��anagement Inc. 6736 Lone Oak Blvd Naples, FL, 34109 239-5914200 'prom: Kaffileen Bra?flerd arzd � chard Di�a�� of 4910 C®ug� c�`c �T��it 101, maples '�lo�-ida 34109 in l�ermuda �'�alms. e are. ®pposi d to the ingress and/or coTess T°eimud,� 111'alms 1)Y this plaumed construction as well as the sheer size. ��Je are a smalll cammu��,r �Jitl�e small cl��ldren children using our entrance for school busses. �,.lso, the sheer size of this new community will overvvhehm lie traffic entering g and exi ancy the main road which is already a major -traffic issue. FVy. Bermum Palms Petition May 6, 2021 at 11:45 AM Diane Dohery �G'oL1��o ;V 0 0 U � t Uuoopil.��oW �Uil(�1f11L� IT �il.C(o> 0:00 AM rb.a Deb@ abilii'ayiearn corn gIcAG- �Lo Rea:; o' fflLPj a PdnIS PoJifioii I oulc lily �� o r orc ol� o�in tl�o u , of n 99 0 CA YI U6 i o for h igross n 3grass Ior the proposecdl "Blue Goren ai�av � �o��i� o� i��lo c �� iFti Germain Le�� ! ility. :�uirher, could suggest that the proposal c o juilL 2000 unity be rodlucLd by altim least 50%. rho amount of of vehicle traffic on Sandra &.�iy drive is currently overwhelmingly slt times anon aulditional hraffic could create a serious hazard i4o 'he residents of Bern-iuola Palms, Nape McLeod f�aples Fl 3410199 Assoc, inn a Deb Swindornian <Deb Lt auility eam.cor,^.,>,mronie: ust realized dd-iat some of yov, may not have tihe abili tos' the artached a 6 ity Ign �etition, and scan bacle, to me. I will accept aiii email with youx address and unit itio, Lumber, Hil lieuof • ,p - •736 Lone Oak Blvd 4aples, FL 'i 11 BIGISf LM, U STIOafi�li OV O Re: Petition opposing Blue Coral Apartments attached May 5, 2021 at 8:37 PM LINDA DURKEE r�emmne Sabata Densmore ��o �bdensmore(c�.gmail.com GAF OKPIIEo 407=885-0655 On tiled, May 5, 2Q21 at 8:5+ AM �cdurkee@aol.coi>> �h�rote: I-li ®lane, ItIVIII63 - IT 0 icy rec©mmendation is that, �noe it is distributed �� signed, drat it be sent in to t6v� st�i�person noted on the public hearing rnotice -- Thomas Clarke@CollierCouniyFL.Gov -- and to each of the Collier County Planning Commissioners -- their names and emails IinGcs -re listed on the Collier County Planning Commission site found at coliiercountyfl.gov. The heariimug nratice sass that �nsw.y�:hing untended to be incfurled in the �genda pac[`jet in ' com�funissione�ra "n�fast ssY�[�r�u6t materials a minimum cif � � days prior to the i'especti�9e �u[�lic G�e�Eie� J." That date is flay 20 -- Fj shoe vdindow of opportunity, Linda ` 1r ��` l'l�� Ji �� nr r n —a :S( �G i `i� (f js� �� l I(i i} (:jl1 JI p�ili t' i i (j' ! r;'.tl cFivU=,f �fl JLy7 CsC�3, 2'�0 J U �C,)E /!LJ t4J r� �0 �.0��7 � G�ii Vn'V Civ'14l}.S� - �f{: FiU 4nry'IiUL'•'t {-''�+�}�--1 (i•ifi r'��t-� �° '�''��'a�.�d`' 'L (Qv'Jio v j t5�✓E�tt�(;+>Jltb�uLuk�J� t:'•1� G7tt�•('� t, � �!�'i-' ct 1-�[i �Uie�ubfl .iJ 50 i„i �a �yJ�, dii�L[ ti ,5•.� .�lv�.G� +�ci' L fps? e:=.`.��:Jli •f lllii __� ,c; �; fj^� rl^ �+�rl � �n �.� C-=J� �!L✓ l'"s1b r ] tF�}ii �1:��..:.i ��U a"1r'.1 ��C:} }u�� ) �� ° � {� _� ..� r t:'y r.iii au r I.F; Unity t;Z[i Q�Qg lfR�� li4y J i�� RtS e�1�A 4411 J �+ n� � ir�rl� nr ��ri }}II rr iP firL [•,R r. [5 L - U a79 '•u �r' L Csl' QO;el) A, _ u 1 t..1Lt r,](;'�e.)�l'��* )U tl J R Quo � �;::� Uc' o Ce Stinj L'•� �(L {�, Cn U'�,Jr�? c C- z` n, '�7f(`lF`` i'•7�{ry�f�: /� � '� n *�f' u cF �.. S+ `.:.l �i +J �iat� >SJ[: �i ti Ll �'.i L�l;�l{+} �x1�"l Ue=fi- U a f..i •... :`'I.'5 Jl:Lr 4li i;i `>.. a ��, � dj L'{,tie *hYi� rlH�.)u�..e Z�{a'Ld�.3 �t.�c,�� U', i.�,if;�C"f R �r` L`%` _.�'��': �,{'/Jy�p ��er7 �r'>r'C' r� r,•n7/%�rY {; -� ^•{'c' �^i�71. yl:C'UYUl! J:JG icy sh:;] �_.}e: c�. •r.l1U'�}iL �J Fj'��i fa•, 7.Fi f` lJ! +Ql7F +`at 1£'jfj sty=J�ui3�� CaMu? 1��C'JF? rt'��:UO ay�I n �� r i! '� C: :i �a:iii > [��'i�t::ldlo�lik;�'- g c ",a+.-•. )�;y n {; 4: C� tF�ii SSA# J'JLi 2r� W2 ri i"ar'^tS ,7 r} 1U L tl� t fl t r!' �'tr^,[ r ^1f?H�i c t. ('r', ! FF' t�i L� G J�.6 uc ul1 , a Uur�,< L��tictl.� t�G;Ux_. .� mAIi fs.P: P E, pr"U {}%r' 3t3 kyr cil tomiu , f cg tb L r- t� J�V :i -r t�-J S, t'� a� �' v 1J 1� .P _..l JAY ��.��l�s{YU{1 .�.� o fey '. - - d �l I o n !> r s'Ft'i. vG ( Jts e t1s?�tl;?''3 ii}i €r4saiciC(,:Onq�- 0 FW: Bermuda Palms Pei(LIOn May 67 2021 at 11:42 AM Diane Dahery 61 2021 8:56 fl ��m o Thursday, May,C� � r©a Dob@ability �sb�ne oi�u u16D o �o Re: Bo much P bins G�etitioVI Assoc, ne = Deep Svinderman <deb@ abilityteam.com> wrote: hello again I just realized that some of you may not have the ability to sign the attached petition, and scan back to me. 1 will accept an email with your address and unit number in lieu of a signature, sorrry for the inconvenience. ability I�vianagenlent Inc. 6136 Lone Cak Blvd Maples, FL '04109 239-5914200 r9/Z Jl�- f 'w i i-ut- r] n.i- n -1,; i .1O ,1 vinfir: t� Litj"Jt �; , tir^sL ij a=`S <)f i j f`C� y i t,ir ('✓a(',`��j'il,`.y�a U `lc-Jr•c.' :I "of Psis e€� h y�le�nn� ,sso> � c�QJ tit r V � m PV4 r r,r r3 9 f� a li �fwess our opposition O:� i r, �•�\�°�1�..s1�?.�� r�`��IJf?� LJ�r�� ileti �� r�t�['.ui :� 7 � i t.�' ��f fee Road asoiiors: 1:_ �errnuda �►sDts for ingress and/oar�Py Mile- Corm Apartment or any other entit, includInvi {G a yin + exns, and for any other purpose, and> +,he eppT;,nly&ii Ot BIUO Coral Apartments unless its 280 units is reduced by at Jeast so percent, a z� G Car �d U-AJ 6 l �� FW: Petition to block new construction of Blue Coral Apartments May 6, 2021 at 11:39 AM Diane Dohery -----Original Message ----- From: Margot John <margotjohnl @mac.com> Sent: Thursday, May 6, 2021 9:52 AM To: Deb Swinderman <dab@abilityieam.com> Subject: Petition to block new construction of Blue Coral Apartments This is Margot John, owner of unit 103, 4910 Cougar North, Naples,FL. I strongly OPPOSE the use of Bermuda Palms as access and egress for the construction of Blue Coral apartments. Also, should the construction go through, I am strongly in FAVOUR of the complex being cut to half the current proposed size from 280 units down to 140 units. Thank you and regards, Margot John (Mrs) Sent from my iPad @�� rc�6rr��7yPirul��lir Fwd: L�lue Coral apartments May 5, 2021 at 3:40 PM Diane Doherty ---------- Forwarded message -------- From: �r�a Russod;arrtl�i �%�li:�ti,laii.c:onl> Date: �/ed, May 5, 2021 ai 3:35 PM Subject: RE: Blue Coral apartments To: Deb Swinderman <deb��abilit��team.ccr>7.> We enjoy the privacy and lack of noise of our small community. There is already too much traffic between us and Juliet many times malting it very difficult to exit our community as well as frequent gridlock at Livingston and Juliet. We are in building 8, ,�202 and it was a positive feature being at the end of the development, eliminating through traffic. This will most likely affect our property value negatively. Dominick and l�mber{y Russo. �� N�R� �y a �� 7 a�'a S�r�tfrom r;,y U.S. G=hula � Srnaripfirnr� ------- Original message ------ From: Dab Swinderman <�iebG�abilitytean�.com> Date: 5/5f21 3:07 PM (GMT 05:00) To: Ktm Russo �;arr.-! f��'�;�iil'?�:iLC�ill>, Diane Doherty <�iiarledohel�yr'me.com> Subje�c: Re: Blue Coral apartments Hi, you can email back to me your comments of your opposition and also include the address and unit number of your condo, thanks Deb On SIVed, May 5, 2021 at 2:53 t3M Kim Russo c;�,l-rn17� hetlnaii.r_al��> wrote: How do we sign This petition. We are in Maryland right now We DEFINITELY are opposed and wish to sign. Thanks �., Sant frorrr my U.S. Cs�f�lar� Srr;artp�roile BcHMUMA PALMS OF NAPLES ON©'OMIINIUMP ASSOC 71ON, INFnr) C ABILITY MANAGEMENT E736 LONE WOW BLVU* MAPLES, FL 34109 PHONE: I39-591im420f, ow LuAiJU�5= Le i �'c�{ i s Condominium Association, inc. r n i, a :ix RI ! ?2og vp on f7J , lifi:�n Cap, ag Apartments tl02 � �fe the or�ders��e�ed, as ��a�rs of th+e Bermuda Paleas Lando deve�opmeh# %Fh lmmokalee R06d In Naple4so FL, hereby express our opposition to the proposed Blue Coral Apartments on Immoki ije a Road as follwn 6 Blue (wal Aparkneats or any other entity. lincluding Germain Laxo,45, and 'For any other purpose, and; Z) WO OPpose the approval of Blue Coral, Apartments unless its proposed size of pup to 280 units is reduced bJ at Mast 50 Fr; r0r, D�ifne Nt. t�o�� t:�Y �atSidknt� � , i'`•� �d� �i111IamiS ®au SmAndennan Re: Bermuda Palms Notice of Public Hearing May 5, 2021 at 3:16 PM John Shupaniuk , Diane Doherty Yes, than{c you John Can Wed, May 5, 2021 at 3:15 PM John Shupeniulc ixshuderC hotmaiLcom> �nrrote: Consader the peto10on signed bark me John Shupeniuk, BugGdang 1 �2030 �i� u ��ie�ut, �C�� 710 lv4 G� rJohn v ' c Sent Pram �Jutlack C l� : Bermuda I�alg�s l�laple� condominium Ass®c, ln�c - Qeb SwindeIII[ a� leb@abilityteam.coi S-> unto May 5, 2021 1:21 PM, iiun= Shupen uk Land irL Zt <sixshuper@hotmail.c& ;> 5ullivac2a. Sarrnuda Palrns Notice of Public Hearing Mello Everyone his is regarding a Notice ofPublic TIearuig which all owners should have reccived by TES lAail on Monday, May 3, 20217 regarrding a proposed 280 unit apartment development known as "Blue, Coral Alenffnents" adjacent to Bermuda. Palms with planned future ingress and egress out of our small comrmunitj. I have a prepared a petition if any ov�jners vshes to sign it for submission to the Collier County Planning Commission: E _ Opposing ingress and egress from Bermuda Palms: and. 2. Proposing that the development be scaled down from the 280 units by at least 50%. �Ti�fortunately, time is not in our favor as the Commission has requested that all material to be included on the agenda package be submitted to them 10 days prior to the Public bearing scheduled for May 20, 2021. If any owner wishes to sign this petltion, It must be returned by email to Qeb(a7.abilityteam. corn, no later that Sunday evening, May 9, 2021 for submission prior to the deadline. Please see a4-zc�.c4led petition thank you ��in(I an" an '7b�ii�� Iblanagement Inc. 6 / 36 I_.c�ilici C)aln 131vd Naples, FL 34109 239-5914200 LES CONDOMINIUMf BILITY r"t�IAGE �I<r n 36 LWMC WAIK BLVa. MAPLES, FL 34 109 Gi -inns of Naples Condominivan AssoCit'C.' � ugej ? 4 Crs,)i;,;�eon to Blue Coral Apartments TC ��r � �i�i r� i,��,r�t��.,� ��- .��_jCti��,r ;r �;�; r,t R€,r� ai'� o ��® �Hri1l�d`� �� C!lndo dlt11p�1�1� •�� - -- F L'c FL.. 5ereby expreors ov � �posItIon to ll l5! .irumis on Immakalee Road as follows.# `1 t? �j`J r ;�-; f-�3�'��a�� r;i::lr' t'; J�r� rTj> �;? Buda Ipal�ns ��r ingress ';r" �r`-c�r-n•zr },r< I r�� s� y ��>Lil�er entity inElu�ding GermainGermainL>Lu�.n �It1GL1 C'; li ]1 JLIIt{s-? J �oLQri? � �oset and; r L r lri i �; fdrL fi ref' t c� rr S ! �ti ,.� F;�c ;�a of Bluerural Apartments unions Its i rF0 28r-uinlf�7o Is reduced by at least 50 perr."PF �}, �1 presgdet, t X& q�) '� rAMe1:Vv% �35 CONDOMINIUMA5r5#�CIATItN, INC, r_s ABILITY MANAGEMENT 3B LVIVt OAK BLVD, WAPLES, FL 34109 pi ONE:. 33-591-4200 �Ei#+IF pfaffispigim ' ommlission - c Ma Bermvidij i*a1m!: of Napies Londomfiniu a Association, Inc, Re: 0PPiDt: ron to Binge Coral Apartments Oates M8V G21 We the Ua dvi�siio nL :l' d, �s ner3 of tt� Bermuda palms condo development on Immokalet R Napits, FL, here q express our opposition to the propo!sej Sklv Immokalee Road as follows* of Bermuda Palms for ingress and/or egress by ao alprrt� or any othsr entity,: intludingermain and tFv7 an �: elr purpose, and, (44pose the apI.A � *:si of Blue Coral Apartments unless its �'i•:3 size of `„ate units is reduced by at least 50 percent, i'. goo a TQ? To: Collier County Planning Commission From: Linda Durkee, Owner at Bermuda Palms Re: Opposition to Blue Coral Apartments on Immokalee Road Date: May 10, 2021 Bermuda Palms Association strenuously opposes Blue Coral Apartments. In its May 10 petition to the Commission, it specifically opposes the use of Bermuda Palms for ingress and/or egress by Blue Coral Apartments or any other entity, including the Germain Immokalee Lexus dealership, or any other purpose. The petition also opposes the development of up to 280 multifamily unless its size is reduced by at least 50 percent. No permit can be complete and rise to the level of approval without these issues being settled. As an owner and resident of Bermuda Palms condominiums, I strenuously object to the proposed Blue Coral Apartments. It does not stand on its own merits. The proposal relies on rebuttable presumptions that make it incomplete. A project of this scale needs to be presented as a complete proposal without critical inconsistencies or rebuttable presumptions. The proposal fails to resolve critical issues, including access to Immokalee Road through Bermuda Palms and water usage from Bermuda Palms. In sum, this proposal does not rise to the level of a complete permit application, and thus does not merit approval by the Commission. * Traffic: The development would exacerbate the too high traffic burden on Immokalee Road due to persistent incremental growth in Collier County and threatened further by profound traffic increases expected from development being decided on for new communities to east of I-75. For example, its intersection with nearby Livingston Road is already at a Level of Service that is below optimal County standards. Growth projected in Collier County in the 2025 and 2040 timeframes would lead to Level of Service failure. Traffic levels along Immokalee Road are so high and the area so build out that planners are envisioning construction of an overpass on Livingston Road. How can it make sense to add to this mix vehicle trips from up to 280 multifamily apartments, which translates to approximately two vehicles per household and up to a minimum increase of 560 vehicles? The voluminous Traffic Study submitted with the proposal breaks down the projected increases into road segments and times of day. It says "the proposed development shall not exceed 119 two-way PM peak hour new trips." But traffic on Immokalee Road from Livingston to Blue Coral Apartments is not considered "de minimis." The congestion is the culmination of approvals of incremental increases in vehicle trips. How many trips are still allowed in the traffic budget? The situation already creates risks for pedestrians and bicyclers, overburdens a national hurricane evacuation route, and exacerbates noise and air pollution levels. Many in Collier and Lee Counties and elsewhere have been vociferously complaining about the traffic, straining the ability to work and recreate safely in Collier County. Limited measures cannot resolve them. A recent letter to the editor in the Naples Daily News calls for no new development on Immokalee Road until road congestion is addressed. Anyone in doubt about the horrible traffic situation should take a test drive in rush hour. * Access: The application proposes future access to Blue Coral Apartments through Bermuda Palms, "subject to neighbor approval." Bermuda Palms Association's petition opposes this access. Yet the proposal is put forward on the basis of this rebuttal presumption. The issue of access needs to be resolved prior to permit approval, not after. If allowed, residents would have to live with increased traffic jams, traffic queues, and risks to public safety. The final project would last for decades. The safety and serenity of Bermuda Palms would suffer incalculable harm. Moreover, the proposal shows possible access by Blue Coral Apartments to Immokalee Road through Germain Immokalee Lexus. The proposal says, "Access to the project will be via a shared access with the property to the east on the eastern property line of the project. " However, project documents go on to say, "If the property line split by the property line is not granted, access will be afforded on the subject property only and will accommodate cross access to the property to the East. Design, permitting and construction of the shared access shall be at the time of the first SDP or Plat." So is this access point still up in the air despite the permit for the dealership already having been approved? If this is a fixed part of that project, why is access through Bermuda Palms necessary? Again, the proposal is unresolved and incomplete. No action should be taken without resolving these issues. * Public Utilities: The proposal leaves unresolved access to the water main at Bermuda Palms. It proposes connecting the existing 8" water main serving Bermuda Palms "to a future 8" water main to be extended through Germain Immokalee from an existing water main stub -out at Useppa Way." But this extension is up in the air. The proposal states, "If a connection to the existing 8" water main serving Bermuda Palms is deemed infeasible by Collier County staff at the time of project development, the developer shall instead connect to the existing 20" water main on the north side of Immokalee Road." There is no inherent right for Blue Coral Apartments to tap into Bermuda Palms' water main, nor has permission to use it been sought. Allowing this use could jeopardize Bermuda Palms' compliance with the National Fire Protection Act in a region of Florida at risk from forest fires. It could negatively affect the volume of water available not only for fire safety but also for residential use at Bermuda Palms. These issues, involving both public health and safety, are unresolved. They must be settled before any application is deemed complete and eligible for Commission action. * Layout: The final proposed layout for Blue Coral apartments, including the height, number of floors, and location of the two residential buildings, is unclear and so unresolved. The layout in design submissions varies. The maximum height for the residential buildings would be limited to 60 actual feet and 55 zoned feet. The parking garage, projected at two stories, has a limit of maximum actual height of 35 feet and zoned height of 30 feet. What is the reality for these three structures? The parking garage is an intensive urban facility inconsistent with location in a residential area. How high would the parking garage be once vehicles parked on the top level, elevators, and circulation systems are accounted for? Further, the designs show four floors, but there is a note that the design is subject to change. There could be more. The final project design on the actual number of floors is unclear and unresolved for purposes of Commission decisionmaking. Nearby residential developments are mainly two stories, including at Bermuda Palms. A related inconsistency is the visual height differential with neighboring properties. The proposal says it is including "setback, buffering height limits and landscaping that will assure compatibility with adjacent properties." Who would determine if compatibility was satisfied and when? * Infill: Urban growth management looks for infill opportunities. The proposal calls Blue Coral Apartments "appropriate." It says the project "is in an ideal location for increased density" as it is "along a major thoroughfare, in close proximity to the Immokalee 175 interchange, and almost immediately abutting Mixed Use Activity Center #4, which is home to a mix of uses and significant commercial intensity." These factors are the very reasons why this site is not at all ideal or appropriate. Blue Coral Apartments would connect to residential buildings to the west and commercial development to the east through a congested area where ingress and egress to these entities are already fraught with safety risks for vehicles, pedestrians, and bicyclers. Saying there is no problem does not make it so. * Summary: Blue Coral Apartments is an inappropriate development for this site due to its size and location in a residential area. The proposal is inconsistent and incomplete because it premises its application in part on access to Immokalee Road through Bermuda Palms condominiums, which the Bermuda Palms Association strenuously opposes. The proposal calls for connecting to the water main at Bermuda Palms, which is another unresolved issue. The developer is asking the Commission to make assumptions about critical aspects about the nature and specifics of this proposal. By definition, these and other issues are rebuttable presumptions the applicant should resolve prior to permitting. The proposal is incomplete and not ready for Commission action.