Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Agenda 09/14/2021 Item #16A51 (RPS #21-7901 with HNTB Corporation)
09/14/2021 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking for Request for Professional Services (“RPS”) No. 21-7901, “Immokalee Road at Randall Boulevard Intersection Improvements,” and authorize staff to begin contract negotiations with the top ranked firm, HNTB Corporation so that staff can bring a proposed agreement back for the Board’s consideration at a subsequent meeting. OBJECTIVE: To approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS No. 21-7901 and to negotiate an agreement to engage professional design services for the Immokalee Road at Randall Boulevard Intersection Improvements project. CONSIDERATIONS: The Florida Department of Transportation has completed a Project Development and Environmental (“PD&E”) Study that confirms this project meets the current needs for operational and safety improvements. A two-phased approach to complete this project has been proposed. Phase 1 will consist of the at-grade widening of Randall Boulevard from east of the intersection with Immokalee Road to 8th Street NE, going from two to four lanes (with a future six lane option available). The improvements will include constructing new sidewalks and on-street bike lanes and upgraded drainage. At intersection of Randall Boulevard and Immokalee Road the project will realign the existing three westbound left turn lanes and one right turn lane from Randall Boulevard continuing through an upgraded traffic signal onto Immokalee Road. The enhanced intersection modification will also have a continuous right turn lane traveling eastbound on Immokalee Road to eastbound on Randall Boulevard. A new traffic signal and intersection will be constructed at the Randall Boulevard and 8th Street NE intersection. The Randall Boulevard access road is proposed to be reconstructed and realigned as part of Phase 1. Phase 2 of this project consists of constructing a future westbound flyover bridge from Randall Boulevard to Immokalee Road. Phase 2 is planned to be completed as a separate project beginning beyond 2035. However, a Bridge Development Report and determination of required right-of way needed for the Phase 2 project will be completed in Phase 1. The Procurement Services Division advertised RPS No. 21-7901 Immokalee Road at Randall Boulevard Intersection Improvements on May 4, 2021, and received five responsive and responsible proposals by the June 14, 2021, deadline. The evaluation criteria included ability of the firm’s professional personnel; whether the firm is a certified minority business enterprise; past performance; project approach; location; and workload of the firm. The solicitation required the firms to submit references from clients on projects of a similar size for which the firms provided services similar in scope and complexity. A selection committee convened on July 8, 2021. The committee scored each of the proposals and shortlisted the top ranked firms. On July 22, 2021, the selection committee re-convened for presentations and the committee ranked the firms in the following final order: Firm Names Final Ranking HNTB Corporation 1 Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. 2 Kimley Horn and Associates Inc. 3 Staff is requesting authorization to begin negotiations with the top ranked firm, and in the event that an agreement cannot be reached with the top ranked firm HNTB Corporation (“HNTB”), staff will continue negotiating with the remaining firms in ranked order in an effort to bring a proposed agreement back for 16.A.51 Packet Pg. 1228 09/14/2021 the Board’s consideration. HNTB is a qualified design consultant that has designed numerous road and bridge project in Florida over the past 60 years. They employ roughly 800 people in Florida and 4500 nationally. HNTB recently completed design services for Collier County’s Eleven Bridge Replacements and Vanderbilt Drive Bridge Replacement projects and the Golden Gate Estates PD&E Study. HNTB’s civil engineering sub consultant, Agnoli, Barber & Brundage, Inc., is a qualified local engineering firm with extensive experience working on Collier County projects. Subject to the Board’s approval of the above recommendation, staff will begin contract negotiations in with HNTB Corporation so that a proposed negotiated agreement can be brought back for the Board’s consideration at a future meeting. FISCAL IMPACT: Approval of this item does not result in a direct fiscal impact; however, the source of funding for the future contract (subject to board approval at a subsequent meeting) will Impact Fees, Gas Taxes and/or Surtax. Approval of this item will not have an impact on operational and maintenance costs; however, the completed project can be expected to have the following operational and maintenance impacts: minimal to no maintenance costs are expected to be incurred within the first 5 to 7 years of service for the new roadway features, and will be absorbed into the regular maintenance schedule thereafter; and the new stormwater features will require minimal maintenance that will be absorbed into the regular maintenance schedule resulting in minimal cost impact. LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: This item has been reviewed by the County Attorney, is approved as to form and legality and requires majority vote for approval. -JAK GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: There is no Growth Management impact. RECOMMENDATION: Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking for RPS No. 21-7901, “Immokalee Road at Randall Boulevard Intersection Improvements,” authorize staff to begin contract negotiations with the top-ranked firm, HNTB Corporation, and in the event that an agreement cannot be reached with that firm, to continue negotiating with the remaining firms in ranked order, so that a proposed agreement can be brought back for the Board’s consideration at a subsequent meeting. Prepared by: Dennis F. McCoy, PE, Senior Project Manager, Transportation Engineering Division, Growth Management Department ATTACHMENT(S) 1. 21-7901 Final Ranking (PDF) 2. 21-7901 Notice of Recommended Award (PDF) 3. [Linked] 21-7901 Solicitation (PDF) 4. [Linked] 21-7901 HNTB Proposal (PDF) 16.A.51 Packet Pg. 1229 09/14/2021 COLLIER COUNTY Board of County Commissioners Item Number: 16.A.51 Doc ID: 17638 Item Summary: Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking for Request for Professional Services (“RPS”) No. 21-7901, “Immokalee Road at Randall Boulevard Intersection Improvements,” and authorize staff to begin contract negotiations with the top ranked firm, HNTB Corporation so that staff can bring a proposed agreement back for the Board’s consideration at a subsequent meeting. Meeting Date: 09/14/2021 Prepared by: Title: Project Manager – Transportation Engineering Name: Dennis McCoy 08/04/2021 1:18 PM Submitted by: Title: Division Director - Transportation Eng – Transportation Engineering Name: Jay Ahmad 08/04/2021 1:18 PM Approved By: Review: Growth Management Department Lissett DeLaRosa Growth Management Department Completed 08/04/2021 2:20 PM Procurement Services Ana Reynoso Level 1 Purchasing Gatekeeper Completed 08/04/2021 2:54 PM Transportation Engineering Marlene Messam Additional Reviewer Completed 08/04/2021 3:50 PM Transportation Engineering Jay Ahmad Additional Reviewer Completed 08/05/2021 9:25 AM Procurement Services Sandra Herrera Additional Reviewer Completed 08/06/2021 12:35 PM Growth Management Operations Support Christopher Johnson Additional Reviewer Completed 08/09/2021 2:25 PM Growth Management Department Gene Shue Additional Reviewer Completed 08/09/2021 3:44 PM Growth Management Department Lisa Taylor Additional Reviewer Completed 08/12/2021 6:14 AM Growth Management Department Trinity Scott Transportation Completed 08/13/2021 4:43 PM County Attorney's Office Scott Teach Additional Reviewer Completed 08/16/2021 8:51 AM Office of Management and Budget Debra Windsor Level 3 OMB Gatekeeper Review Completed 08/16/2021 9:11 AM County Attorney's Office Jeffrey A. Klatzkow Level 3 County Attorney's Office Review Completed 08/16/2021 10:22 AM Office of Management and Budget Laura Zautcke Additional Reviewer Completed 08/25/2021 4:48 PM Office of Management and Budget Susan Usher Additional Reviewer Completed 09/03/2021 11:29 AM County Manager's Office Amy Patterson Level 4 County Manager Review Completed 09/03/2021 5:13 PM 16.A.51 Packet Pg. 1230 09/14/2021 Board of County Commissioners Geoffrey Willig Meeting Pending 09/14/2021 9:00 AM 16.A.51 Packet Pg. 1231 Selection Committee Final Ranking Sheet RPS #: 21-7901 Title: Immokalee Road at Randall Boulevard Intersection Improvements Name of Firm Mario Puente Dennis McCoy Anthony Stolts Leandro Goicoechea Brittany Lazo Total Selection Committee Final Rank HNTB Corporation 1 2 1 1 3 8 1.0000 Jacobs Engineering Group Inc.3 1 2 2 1 9 2.0000 Kimley Horn and Associates Inc.2 3 3 3 2 13 3.0000 Procurement Professional Viviana Giarimoustas 7/22/2021 Step 1: Upon direction by the Procurement professional, the individual selection committee member should provide their ranking of the proposals (from highest being number one (1) to lowest. Step 2: The procurement professional will review the mathematically calculated final rank and call out the final rank order. Page 1 of 1 16.A.51.a Packet Pg. 1232 Attachment: 21-7901 Final Ranking (17638 : Randall Boulevard Intersection Design - Approval to Notice of Recommended Award Solicitation: 21-7901 Title: Immokalee Road At Randall Boulevard Intersection Improvements Due Date and Time: 6/14/2021 10:00 AM EST Respondents: Company Name City County State Final Ranking Responsive/Responsible HNTB Corporation Tampa Hillsborough FL 1 YES/YES Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. Naples Collier FL 2 YES/YES Kimley Horn and Associates inc. Fort Myers Lee FL 3 YES/YES Stantec Consulting Services Inc. Naples Collier FL Not Ranked YES/YES Kisinger Campo & Associates Corp. Tampa Hillsborough FL Not Ranked YES/YES Utilized Local Vendor Preference: Yes No Recommended Vendor(s) For Award: On May 4, 2021, the Procurement Services Division released notices of Request for Professional Services 21- 7901 Immokalee Road at Randall Boulevard Intersection Improvements. 7,639 firms were notified, 97 firms viewed the information, and five (5) responsive and responsible proposals were received on June 14, 2021. The solicitation was extended an additional eleven days. A minimum of three references were requested from clients of projects with similar size for which the firm provided services similar in scope and complexity. The selection committee convened on July 8 ,2021. The committee scored each of the proposals and shortlisted the following firms: HNTB Corporation Jacobs Engineering Group Inc. Kimley Horn and Associates inc. On July 22, 2021, the selection committee convened for presentations and the committee ranked the firms as shown above. Staff is recommending negotiations with the top ranked firm, HNTB Corporation. Contract Driven Purchase Order Driven Required Signatures Project Manager: Dennis McCoy Procurement Strategist: Viviana Giarimoustas Procurement Services Director: __________________________________ _________________ Sandra Herrera Date DocuSign Envelope ID: 02300D4D-0C23-4E0C-BFA2-4B39E9D580E5 7/22/2021 7/22/2021 7/23/2021 16.A.51.b Packet Pg. 1233 Attachment: 21-7901 Notice of Recommended Award (17638 : Randall Boulevard Intersection Design - Approval to Negotiate) Collier County Administrative Services Department Procurement Services Division COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS REQUEST FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES (RPS) In accordance with Florida Statute 287.055 Consultants' Competitive Negotiation Act FOR IMMOKALEE ROAD AT RANDALL BOULEVARD INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS RPS NO.: 21-7901 VIVIANA GIARIMOUSTAS, PROCUREMENT STRATEGIST PROCUREMENT SERVICES DIVISION 3295 TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST, BLDG C-2 NAPLES, FLORIDA 34112 TELEPHONE: (239) 252-8375 Viviana.Giarimoustas@colliercountyfl.gov (Email) This proposal solicitation document is prepared in a Microsoft Word format (rev 8/16/17). Any alterations to this document made by the Consultant may be grounds for rejection of proposal, cancellation of any subsequent award, or any other legal remedies available to the Collier County Government. SOLICITATION PUBLIC NOTICE REQUEST FOR PROFESSINAL 21-7901 SERVICES (RPS) NUMBER: PROJECT TITLE: Immokalee Road At Randall Boulevard Intersection Improvements RPS OPENING DAY/DATE/TIME: Thursday, June 3, 2021 10:00 AM EST PLACE OF RPS OPENING: Procurement Services Division 3295 Tamiami Trail East, Bldg. C-2 Naples, FL 34112 All proposals shall be submitted online via the Collier County Procurement Services Division Online Bidding System: hi!ps://www.bidsync.com/bidsync-cas INTRODUCTION As requested by the Transportation Engineering Division (hereinafter, the "Division"), the Collier County Board of County Commissioners Procurement Services Division (hereinafter, "County") has issued this Request for Professional Services (hereinafter, "RPS") with the intent of obtaining proposals from interested and qualified Consultants in accordance with the terms, conditions and specifications stated or attached. The Consultant, at a minimum, must achieve the requirements of the Specifications or Scope of Work stated. The County is interested in receiving proposals from experienced design teams to design the Immokalee Road (CR 846) at Randall Boulevard Intersection Improvements project. The Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) has completed a Project Development and Environmental (PD&E) Study that confirms this particular project meets the current needs for operational and safety improvements. The Consultant may use the approved concepts as a basis for the design unless otherwise directed by the County. All PD&E study final reports can be obtained at the FDOT website (http:Hswflroads.com/immokalee/randall/pde/). A two -phased approach to complete this project has been proposed. The interim at -grade preferred build alternative (Phase 1- triple lefts) proposes to widen the existing two-lane Randall Boulevard to four lanes (with a future six lane option available), adding sidewalks and bike lanes and providing drainage improvements. The project limits extend along Immokalee Road (SR 846) to approximately one mile south of Oil Well Road and east along Randall Boulevard from the Immokalee Road/ Randall Boulevard intersection to just east of the intersection of Randall Boulevard and 8th Street NE (about 0.75 miles in length). The intersection improvements will consist of constructing three left turn lanes and one right turn lane westbound from Randall Boulevard continuing through an upgraded traffic signal and onto Immokalee Road. A continuous flow right turn lane is proposed eastbound on Immokalee Road to eastbound on Randall Boulevard. A new traffic signal and intersection will be constructed at the Randall Boulevard and 8th Street NE intersection. The corridor will be evaluated for street lighting improvements. The Randall Boulevard access road is proposed to be reconstructed and realigned to intersect Randall Boulevard further east. The proposed access road will remain a two-way, two-lane undivided typical section, but will include curb and gutter for drainage and a 5-foot sidewalk along the south side. The ultimate preferred build alternative (Phase 2- flyover) proposed plan for this intersection is to construct a two-lane flyover bridge westbound from Randall Boulevard to Immokalee Road bypassing the traffic signal along with expanding the continuous -flow right turn lane to two -lanes. Although the Phase 2 portion of the project is planned beyond 2035, a Bridge Development Report (BDR) and determination of required right-of-way needed for the bridge structure will be completed in phase 1 of the project. The at -grade improvements will include the design and permitting, drainage, utilities, and right-of-way of the ultimate intersection capacity improvements. The targeted contract schedule is 1,160 calendar days from the issuance of the notice to proceed (NTP). A total of 550 days for completion of design phase services, 180 days for bid phase services and 430 days for post design phase services is anticipated. A separate NTP will be issued for the post design phase of the contract. BACKGROUND Immokalee Road (CR 846) is a six -lane minor arterial highway with a raised median, bike lanes, and a wide sidewalk on the south side. Randall Boulevard is a local two-way, undivided two-lane minor collector street with drainage ditches and a sidewalk on the north side. The Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) develops the Long -Range Transportation Plan (LRTP), which is a twenty- year vision for future transportation needs. The revision cycle occurs every five years. The 2020 LRTP update originally identified a need for widening Randall Boulevard to a six -lane arterial. It remained an unfunded need through subsequent LRTP updates. On May 25, 2018, the 2040 LRTP was amended to include the project in the Cost Feasible Plan. The 2045 LRTP was adopted by the MPO Board on December 11, 2020. The 2045 LRTP includes the first phase improvements to the intersection in the 2021-2026 timeframe, and preliminary engineering for the ultimate intersection improvement — a flyover — in the 2036-2045 planning period. The project's intersection improvements and roadway expansion will add capacity to the corridor and relieve congestion on both Immokalee Road and Randall Boulevard. In addition, there will also be a reduced need for road maintenance and a reduction in injuries or fatalities by providing sidewalks for pedestrians and on -street bike lanes for bicyclists, upgrading and adding signals and improving overall traffic operations. TERM OF CONTRACT County reserves the right to modify this scope during negotiations for budgetary reasons. The contract term, if an award is made, will commence on the date of the Notice to Proceed and end upon acceptance and approval of the final payment. Prices shall remain firm for the term of the awarded contract. Surcharges will not be accepted in conjunction with this award, and such charges should be incorporated into the pricing structure. DETAILED SCOPE OF WORK COUNTY Project No.: 60147 Federal Aid Project No.: 1545-003-S Description: Immokalee Road (CR 846) at Randall Blvd Intersection Improvements, Collier County Bridge No.: N/A Railroad Crossing No: N/A Context Classification: C-3R (Suburban Residential) 1 Purpose The purpose of this is to describe the scope of work and the responsibilities of the CONSULTANT and the COUNTY in connection with the design and preparation of a complete set of construction contract documents and incidental engineering services, as necessary, for improvements to the transportation facility described herein. Major work mix includes: • 0020 New Bridge Construction • 0213 Add Lanes & Reconstruct Major work groups include: • 2.0 Project Development and Environmental (PD&E) Studies • 3.2 Major Highway Design • 4.2 Major Bridge Design Minor work groups include: • 4.1 Miscellaneous Structures and Minor Bridge Design • 6.3.1 ITS Analysis & Design • 7.1 Signing, Pavement Marking & Channelization • 7.2 Lighting • 7.3 Signalization • 8.1 Control Surveying • 8.2 Design, Right of Way Construction Surveying • 8.3 Photogrammetric Mapping • 8.4 Right of Way Mapping • 9.1 Soil Exploration • 9.2 Geotechnical Classification Lab Testing • 9.3 Highway Materials Testing • 9.4 Foundation Studies • 9.5 Geotechnical Specialty Lab Testing • 15.0 Landscape Architect. The consultant submitting as the prime consultant at a minimum must be pre -qualified through the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) in the following work groups: • Group 2 — PD&E Studies • Group 3 - Highway Design — Roadway: 3.2 Major Highway Design • Group 4 — Highway Design — Bridges: 4.2 Major Bridge Design Also, at a minimum, the consultant or its subconsultant(s) must be pre -qualified through the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) in the following work groups: • Group 4 — Highway Design — Bridges: 4.1 Miscellaneous Structures and Minor Bridge Design • Group 7 — Traffic Operations Design • Group 8 — Surveying and Mapping • Group 9 — Soil Exploration, Material Testing, and Foundations • Group 15 — Landscape Architect. Known alternative construction contracting methods include: N/A. The general objective is for the CONSULTANT to prepare a set of contract documents including plans, specifications, supporting engineering analysis, calculations and other technical documents in accordance with FDOT and COUNTY policy, procedures and requirements. These Contract documents will be used by the contractor to build the project and test the project components. These Contract documents will be used by the COUNTY or its Construction Engineering Inspection (CEI) representatives for inspection and final acceptance of the project. The CONSULTANT shall follow a system engineering process to ensure that all required project components are included in the development of the Contract documents and the project can be built as designed and to specifications. The Scope of Services establishes which items of work in the FDOT Manual of Uniform Minimum Standards for Design, Construction and Maintenance (Florida Greenbook), COUNTY Code and other pertinent manuals are specifically prescribed to accomplish the work included in this solicitation and indicate which items of work will be the responsibility of the CONSULTANT and/or the COUNTY. The CONSULTANT shall be aware that as a project is developed, certain modifications and/or improvements to the original concepts may be required. The CONSULTANT shall incorporate these refinements into the design and consider such refinements to be an anticipated and integral part of the work. This shall not be a basis for any supplemental fee request(s). The CONSULTANT shall demonstrate good project management practices while working on this project. These include communication with the COUNTY and others as necessary, management of time and resources, and documentation. The CONSULTANT shall set up and maintain throughout the design of the project a contract file in accordance with COUNTY procedures. The CONSULTANT is expected to know the laws and rules governing their professions and are expected to provide services in accordance with current regulations, codes and ordinances and recognized standards applicable to such professional services. The CONSULTANT shall provide qualified technical and professional personnel to perform to COUNTY standards and procedures, the duties and responsibilities assigned under the terms of this agreement. The CONSULTANT shall minimize to the maximum extent possible the COUNTY's need to apply its own resources to assignments authorized by the COUNTY. The COUNTY will provide contract administration, management services, and technical reviews of all work associated with the development and preparation of contract documents, including Construction documents. The COUNTY's technical reviews are for high-level conformance and are not meant to be comprehensive reviews. The CONSULTANT shall be fully responsible for all work performed and work products developed under this Scope of Services. The COUNTY may provide job -specific information and/or functions as outlined in this solicitation if favorable. It is imperative that all signal, roadway lighting, and signing and pavement marking design be reviewed and approved by Collier County Traffic Operations at each phase of the project. The designer shall adhere to the current Collier County Traffic Operations specifications to minimize redesign. 2 Project Description The CONSULTANT shall investigate the status of the project and become familiar with concepts and commiments (typical sections, alignments, etc.) developed from prior studies and/or activities. A Project Development and Environment (PD&E) study has been completed by FDOT for this project. The CONSULTANT shall use the approved concepts as a basis for the design unless otherwise directed by the COUNTY. All PD&E study final reports can be obtained at the FDOT website (hqp:Hswflroads.com/immdcalee/randall/pde ). This project encompasses approximately a 3/4-mile section of Randall Boulevard (from Immckalee Road east to 8th Street NE) and includes a new interim at -grade intersection; referred to as the Preferred Build Alternative — Phase 1 Triple Lefts in the PD&E Study. The ultimate design for this intersection calls for a grade separated overpass (GSO) westbound on Randall Boulevard connecting to Immckalee Road; referred as the Preferred Build Alternative — Phase 2 Flyover in the PD&E Study. Under this at -grade phase (Phase 1), the GSO (Phase 2) will need to be evaluated so the at -grade intersection improvement is compatible with the future GSO. The at - grade design shall accommodate the footprint of an ultimate GSO. In addition, a future project proposes widening Randall Boulevard from two to six lanes from west of 8th Street NE east to Desoto Boulevard N. Phase 1 (Interim Improvement) Phase 1 improvements will consist of reconstructing the existing two-lane undivided typical section to a four -lane divided section with a 44-foot median to allow for future widening of Randall Boulevard to six lanes. The typical section will include 11-foot travel lanes and 7-foot bike lanes. A six-foot sidewalk along the south side of Randall Boulevard is proposed and the existing five-foot sidewalk will remain on the north side. The interim intersection improvements for Immokalee Road (SR 846) at Randall Boulevard will require signal upgrades due to the proposed lane configurations. A signal warrant study has been completed at the intersection of Randall Boulevard at 8th Street NE and a signal is warranted. The proposed continuous flow right turn lane from eastbound Immokalee Road (CR 846) to eastbound Randall Boulevard is proposed to be one, 11-foot travel lane with a 7-foot bike lane. Pedestrian access facilities shall be designed within the improvements. The Randall Boulevard Access Road is proposed to be reconstructed and realigned to intersect Randall Boulevard further east. The proposed access road will remain a two-way, two-lane undivided typical section, but will include curb and gutter for drainage and a 5-foot sidewalk along the south side. The at -grade improvements (Phasel) will include a PD&E reevaluation, final design and permitting, drainage, utilities, public involvement, and right-of-way of the ultimate (Phase 2) intersection capacity improvements. As indicated above, the COUNTY plans to perform Right -of -Way (ROW) acquisition along Immokalee Road as part of Phase 1 project implementation. The ROW acquisition is intended to support design elements that are planned for Phase 2. Subsequently the Phase 1 design includes 30% design development for Phase 2 items such as future grade separated flyover bridge, bridge culvert extension, canal realignment, future sidewalk layouts etc. that will enable the COUNTY and CONSULTANT to determine appropriate extent of ROW acquisition. The CONSULTANT's design documents (plans) should clearly indicate future design provisions. 2.1. Project General and Roadway (Activities 3, 4, and 5) Public Involvement: See Public Involvement Scope, Section 3.1 Other Agency Presentations/Meetings: See Public Involvement Scope, Section 3.1 Joint Participation Agreements: N/A. Specification Package Preparation: See Specifications Package Preparation, Section 3.3 Value Engineering: Value Engineering/Independent Peer Review services will be conducted by an independent CONSULTANT for this project. Please review Section 3.5 for details. Risk Assessment Workshop: N/A. Plan Type: Plan/Profile. The CONSULTANT shall provide all plans and details necessary for construction of the project described herein. The CONSULTANT is expected to follow all design criteria and processes provided in the latest version of the FDOT Manual of Uniform Minimum Standards for Design, Construction and Maintenance (commonly known as the Florida Greenbook). Additional criteria from the Construction Standards Handbook for Work Within the Public Right-of-way Collier County, Florida, and the Collier County Urban Land Development Code (CCULDC) should also be utilized. The 2018 FDOT Design Manual (FDM) criteria as well as the National Association of City Transportation Officials (NACTO) Urban Bikeway Design Guide should be considered for best practice. Deviations from the criteria and processes provided in the FDM must be approved by the COUNTY in writing. Typical Section: The CONSULTANT shall develop and submit a signed and sealed Typical Section Package. The at -grade intersection improvement design will be based on the preferred interim at -grade improvements shown in the PD&E Study referred as Preferred Build Alternative — Phase 1 Triple Lefts. Pavement Design: The CONSULTANT shall provide all pavement designs required for the project. The CONSULTANT shall submit a signed and sealed Pavement Design Package before the 30% plan submittal for County approval. Pavement Type Selection Report(s): N/A. Cross Slope: As needed. The CONSULTANT shall evaluate any necessary modifications to cross slopes of existing pavement to be retained as part of this project. Access Management Classification: The adopted access management classifications shall be utilized; Immokalee Road — Class 5, Randall Blvd — Class 7 as defined per Collier County 2013 Resolution 13-257 Table 1. Transit Route Features: There are two Collier Area Transit (CAT) Routes that serve the project area; CAT Route 19: Golden Gate Estates to Immokalee and CAT Route 28 Golden Gate Estates / Everglades Blvd to Immokalee. In addition, there are transit stops along the project limits. The CONSULTANT shall coordinate with Collier County Public Transit and Neighborhood Enhancements prior to impacting any of the transit locations; as well as for potential bus stop enhancements and/or new stop relocations are possible. Major Intersections/Interchanges: Randall Boulevard and Immokalee Road (CR 846). Roadway Alternative Analysis: N/A. Level of TTCP: The CONSULTANT shall provide Temporary Traffic Control Plans as required. Special considerations shall be given to surrounding resident and business access points. It is anticipated that the project will require Level II Plans. Temporary Lighting: The CONSULTANT is responsible for any temporary lighting designs necessary for the project (when/if required). Temporary Signals: The CONSULTANT is responsible for any temporary signals designs necessary for the project (when/if required). A temporary signal may be needed at the Immokalee Road intersection. Temporary Drainage: The CONSULTANT is responsible for any temporary drainage designs necessary for the project (when/if required). Design Variations/Exceptions: N/A Back of Sidewalk Profiles: TBD Selective Clearing and Grubbing: approximately 18 acres Landscaping: CONSULTANT will design irrigation and electrical conduit locations per direction from Collier Count Landscape Department. In addition, any special landscape Median Fill will be specified per direction from Collier Count Landscape Department. 2.2. Drainage (Activities 6a and 6b) System Type: The stormwater system will be designed to meet the permitting requirements of all permitting agencies. The Stormwater system design will consider best management practices. For this project, expected systems include a closed system, lateral ditches, ponds, and floodplain involvement within the right-of-way. The design/coordination of off -site ponds is part of this Scope of Services. 2.3. Utilities Coordination (Activity 7) The CONSULTANT is responsible to certify that all necessary arrangements for utility work on this project have been made and will not conflict with the physical construction schedule. The CONSULTANT should coordinate with COUNTY personnel to coordinate transmittals to Utility Companies and meet production schedules. The CONSULTANT shall ensure FDOT and COUNTY standards, policies, procedures, practices, and design criteria are followed concerning utility coordination. Provide prequalified/competent personnel necessary to efficiently and effectively carry out its responsibilities under this solicitation. The County's Project Administrator/Manager shall be responsible for verifying and maintaining copies of all required licenses, certifications, and qualifications requested from the Consultant throughout the term of the contract. The CONSULTANT may employ more than one individual or utility engineering consultant to provide utility coordination and engineering design expertise. The CONSULTANT shall identify a dedicated person responsible for managing all utility coordination activities. This person shall be contractually referred to as the Utility Coordination Manager and shall be identified in the CONSULTANT proposal. The Utility Coordination Manager shall be required to satisfactorily demonstrate to the COUNTY's Project Manager that they have the following knowledge, skills, and expertise: A minimum of 4 years of experience performing utility coordination in accordance with FDOT, Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), and American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) standards, policies, and procedures. A thorough knowledge of the FDOT plans production process and District utility coordination process. A thorough knowledge of FDOT agreements, standards, policies, and procedures. The Utility Coordination Manager shall be responsible for managing all utility coordination, including the following: Assuring that Utility Coordination and accommodation is in accordance to the COUNTY, FDOT, FHWA, and AASHTO standards, policies, procedures, and design criteria. Assisting the Engineer of Record (EOR) in identifying all existing utilities and coordinating any new installations. Assisting the FOR with resolving utility conflicts. Scheduling and performing utility coordination meetings, keeping and distribution of minutes/action items of all utility meetings, and ensuring expedient follow-up on all unresolved issues. Distributing all plans, conflict matrixes and changes to affected utility owners and making sure this information is properly coordinated and documented. Identifying and coordinating the completion of any COUNTY or utility owner agreement that is required for reimbursement, or accommodation of the utility facilities associated with the project. Review and certify to the COUNTY Project Manager that all Utility Work Schedules are correct and in accordance with the COUNTY's standards, policies, and procedures. Prepare, review and process all utility related reimbursable paperwork inclusive of betterment and salvage determination. The CONSULTANT's utility coordination work shall be performed and directed by the Utility Coordination Manager that was identified and approved by COUNTY's Project Manager. Any proposed change of the approved Utility Coordination Manager shall be subject to review and approval by COUNTY's Project Manager prior to any change being made in this contract. Anticipated utilities include: • Florida Power and Light • Lee County Electric Cooperative • Hotwire Communications • Resource Conservation Systems • Qwest Communications • Comcast • CenturyLink/Lumen • Summit Broadband, Inc. • TECO Peoples Gas • Crown Castle Fiber • Collier County IT • Collier County Utilities • Collier County Traffic Operations • Collier County ITS / ATMS • Collier County Schools 2.4. Environmental Permits and Environmental Clearances (Activity 8) The CONSULTANT shall coordinate with all appropriate regulatory agencies to obtain all necessary permits, which may include but not limited to: • Environmental Resource Permit (SFWMD) • National Discharge Pollutant Elimination System General Permit (FDEP) The CONSULTANT is responsible for the identifying and applying for all necessary permits for the project. The CONSULTANT is responsible for all permit coordination and revisions necessary to obtain the required permits. The CONSULTANT shall obtain COUNTY review of the plans and application before submitting to the permitting agencies and assist the COUNTY in developing the permitting strategy for the project. All application and processing fees associated with permitting activities shall be paid for by the COUNTY directly to each applicable agency. The COUNTY will direct use of mitigation banks as required. 2.5. Structures (Activities 9 —18) Type of Bridge Structure Work: Bridge Development Report (BDR). A BDR for the future GSO is part of this scope of services. Retaining Walls: As required by roadway improvement design and 30% design for future flyover. Noise Barrier Walls: NA Miscellaneous: potentially including special lighting foundations and mast arm signalization structures. 2.6. Signing and Pavement Markings (Activities 19 & 20) The CONSULTANT shall provide all design services and deliver construction documents for all signing and pavement markings required for the project. The CONSULTANT shall coordinate with COUNTY's Traffic Operations Department to maintain integrity of COUNTY's sign asset database. Contractor to follow Traffic Operations Signing and Pavement Markings special provision details which include using a 2.5" x 2.5" galvanized metal square tubular signpost. 2.7. Signalization (Activities 21 & 22) This Scope of Services includes the design of signals within the footprint of at -grade intersections of Randall Boulevard at Immokalee Road (CR846) and Randall Boulevard at 8' Street NE. Intersections: Existing Signalized Intersection: Randall Blvd. and Immokalee Road (CR846). Proposed Signalized Intersection: Randall Blvd. and 81' St NE. A signal warrant study at the intersection of Randall Blvd and 8th St NE has been completed. Traffic Data Collection: The CONSULTANT shall coordinate with the COUNTY's Transportation Planning and Traffic Operations sections to see if required traffic data is available for Randall Blvd - Immokalee Road intersection and Randall Blvd. east of the intersection. Traffic Studies: The CONSULTANT shall utilize the PD&E traffic study at the intersection of Randall Blvd. and Immokalee Road to provide the intersection configuration needed for proper operations for the projected traffic volumes. Count Stations: TBD. Traffic Monitoring Sites: TBD 2.8. Lighting (Activities 23 & 24) The CONSULTANT shall provide all design services and deliver construction documents for all lighting required for the project. The CONSULTANT will analyze the luminescence needs for the project and provide recommendations for street lighting compatible with an ultimate six -lane configuration for Randall Blvd. Services include providing a lighting justification report and a lighting design analysis report. 2.9. Landscape (Activities 25 & 26) Include coordination with existing and/or proposed underground utilities including but not limited to lighting, drainage and ITS. Landscape coordination with ITS shall include both underground conflicts and above -ground impacts to existing and/or proposed ITS coverage. The CONSULTANT shall closely coordinate with the COUNTY's ITS units to ensure that all conflicts are identified, addressed and mitigated in the Contract Documents. Landscape coordination includes proposed conduits and sleeves for proposed landscaping items. Architectural Pavers will be designed in medians where applicable. The Consultant will not provide analysis and/or Landscaping Irrigation and Planting Plans. CONSULTANT shall provide adequate landscaping topsoil along the median for future COUNTY use and "Base Level of Landscaping" per Collier County Landscape Beautification Master Plan. Outdoor Advertising: N/A 2.10. Survey (Activity 27) Design Survey: All survey is required for this project including a detailed topographic and control survey for Randall Blvd. from Immokalee Road to approximately 1/4-mile east of 8t' St NE (approximately 1/4 mile in length) and for Immokalee Road from just west of Wilson Boulevard to south of Oil Well Road (approximately one mile in length) including all access points in between, within Collier County existing ROW. Subsurface Utility Exploration: Subsurface Utility Engineering (SUE) per the American Society of Civil Engineers accepted guidelines for the collection and depiction of existing subsurface utility data using Quality Level "A" at any proposed mast arm foundations in an area two (2) times the proposed drilled shaft diameter prior to the final design. Additional SUE locations TBD at the future GSO bridge location and proposed lighting & drainage locations. A quantity of 50 underground locates (Vvh's) is anticipated for this project and is included in this Scope of Services. Right of Way Survey: All Right of Way survey is required for this project for Randall Blvd. from Immokalee Road to approximately 1/4-mile east of 8th St NE and for Immokalee Road from approximately 500' east of Randall Blvd to Wilson Blvd. Pond Site and Floodplain Compensation Area: Prepare a boundary and topographic survey for the proposed pond site and pond outfall to the Corkscrew Canal. Spot elevations will be collected on a 100' +/- grid and extend 100' beyond the parcel external boundary. Prepare a topographical survey for the proposed floodplain compensation area and outfall to the proposed pond. Spot elevations will be collected on a 50' +/- grid. Vegetation Survey: Mature trees and palms within the construction limits shall be identified on the design plans. Bathymetric Survey: Provide bathymetric survey along Cocahatchee Canal and Corkscrew Canal to support preliminary design for future Cocahatchee Canal realignment, future bridge culvert extensions, etc. (that are planned to be performed in Phase 2). Bathymetric survey shall be performed in conformance with South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) requirements for such improvements. 2.11. Photogrammetry (Activity 28) In accordance to FDOT Photogrammetry Handbook and adequate coverage to provide data as defined below in Section 2.12 Mapping. 2.12. Mapping (Activity 29) Control Survey Map: The CONSULTANT is responsible for all Control Survey Maps necessary for the project. Right of Way Map: The CONSULTANT is responsible for all Right of Way Maps and Technical Memorandums for right of way acquisitions, including condemnation, necessary for the project. Legal Descriptions: The CONSULTANT is responsible for all Legal Descriptions and sketches necessary for the project. Maintenance Map: As required. Miscellaneous Items: As required. 2.13. Terrestrial Mobile LiDAR (Activity 30) - N/A. 2.14. Architecture (Activity 31) - N/A. 2.15. Noise Barriers (Activity 32) - As requested. 2.16. Intelligent Transportation Systems (Activities 33 & 34) - As requested. 2.17. Geotechnical (Activity 35) The CONSULTANT shall be responsible for all necessary geotechnical activities associated with/required for this project. Types of borings anticipated include for roadway, structures, storm pipe, ponds, lighting, and signals. The geotechnical investigations shall also account for Phase 2 work items such as the grade separated bridge flyover and other elements for which 30% design is being developed under this Phase 1 contract. 2.18.31) Modeling (Activity 36) - N/A. 2.19. Project Schedule The anticipated design schedule for the project is 550 calendar days from the date of Notice to Proceed (NTP). The targeted total contract schedule is 1,160 calendar days from the issuance of the NTP. This will consist of a design phase (550 days), a bid phase (180 days) and a post design phase (430 days). A separate NTP will be issued for the post design services phase. Within ten (10) days after the NTP is issued, and prior to the CONSULTANT beginning work, the CONSULTANT shall provide a detailed project activity/event schedule in Microsoft Project for COUNTY and CONSULTANT to meet the completion date for design. The targeted total contract schedule is 1,160 calendar days from the issuance of the NTP. This will consist of a design phase (550 days), a bid phase (180 days) and a post design phase (430 days). A separate NTP will be issued for the post design services phase. The schedule shall indicate each milestone activity/event that is included in the scope of work and at a minimum, submission dates for 30% plans, 60% plans, 90% plans, Final plan, and SFWMD submittal packages. The schedule shall allow for a minimum of 21 calendar days for COUNTY reviews of the 30% plans, 60% plans, 90% plans and Final plans. All fees and price proposals are to be based on a contract schedule of 1200 calendar days for final construction contract documents and post design services. In no event shall the contract deadline exceed 1200 calendar days from the date of initial Notice to Proceed. A constructability review will be conducted by the COUNTY between the 60% and 90% plan submittals. The Bid Plans shall not be submitted prior to obtaining a notice of intent to permit from the governing permitting agencies, which may include FDEP, USACE, and SFWMD. Periodically, throughout the life of the contract, the project schedule shall be reviewed and, with the approval of the COUNTY, adjusted as necessary to incorporate changes in the Scope of Services and progress to date. The approved schedule and schedule status report, along with progress, shall be submitted with the monthly progress report and p. 2.20. Submittals -Deliverables The CONSULTANT shall furnish documents as required by the COUNTY to adequately control, coordinate, and approve the work concepts. At each submittal phase, the CONSULTANT shall provide all sheets pertaining to the roadway design, and those of the other component plans in strict conformance to the FDOT Design Manual sequence of plans preparation. Partial phase deliverables will not be accepted. To expedite the design reviews, the COUNTY prefers to use the Bluebeam Revu software platform. The CONSULTANT shall set up studio project collaboration sessions in Bluebeam at each phase submittal, if the CONSULTANT is accustomed to and uses this platform. The CONSULTANT shall manage the marked -up documents so that comments can be tracked and are easily organized for hard copy print outs. If the CONSULTANT does not have the use of Bluebeam, a File Transfer server should be used to submit deliverables in Adobe PDF format. All submitted documents shall be digitally signed and sealed in accordance with applicable Florida Statutes. All documents shall be developed and submitted in accordance with the latest edition of the FDM unless otherwise directed by the COUNTY in writing. Each submittal shall include one (1) digital copy of all documents required for the submittal as defined herein. Method of delivery must be preapproved by the COUNTY. In addition to the delivery of the files produced during the course of project development, the COUNTY requires the inclusion of Engineering Data files (prepared by or for the CONSULTANT) for critical geometries in the design. These can include the alignments, profiles, cross sections, surfaces, etcetera necessary to create the corridor model(s). Critical roadway geometric items, such as the centerlines and profiles of the proposed mainline, side streets, special ditches, and utilities, must be included. These Engineering Data files are considered "Project Documents" as defined in the contract and shall be provided when requested by the COUNTY. All Engineering Data files shall be compatible with Bentley OpenRoads (SS4) Technology platform. Drawings files shall be provided in most current versions of a fully functional MicroStation V8i (.dgn) or AutoCAD 2019(.dwg) or later software format, and also plotted or scanned to an Adobe Acrobat (.pdf) format in individual sheets. Specifications shall be provided in Microsoft Word 2003 or later. The comment and review process for all deliverables for this Contract shall utilize Bluebeam Studio Sessions. The CONSULTANT shall be responsible to setup Bluebeam Session for soliciting COUNTY's comments on each submittal. The CONSULTANT's Bluebeam setup shall include comment tracking and response mechanism. The CONSULTANT shall provide Session access to COUNTY's staff (and other independent Consultant's) as identified by COUNTY's Project Manager. The CONSULTANT shall provide response to each comment until comment is identified marked with a "CLOSED" status by the Reviewer. The CONSULTANT shall maintain copies of all Session files and submit to COUNTY as supplementary files to the Final Deliverable. Use of Bluebeam Sessions for submittal reviews (including setup, upload and maintain comment records) is considered as part of the design approval process; subsequently no separate payment shall be made for Bluebeam Sessions. 2.21. Provisions for Work All work shall be prepared with English units in accordance with the latest editions of standards and requirements utilized by the COUNTY which include, but are not limited to, publications such as: General Title 29, Part 1910, Standard 1910.1001, Code of Federal Regulations (29 C.F.R. 1910.1001) — Asbestos Standard for Industry, U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) 29 C.F.R. 1926.1101 — Asbestos Standard for Construction, OSHA 40 C.F.R. 61, Subpart M - National Emission Standard for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP), Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 40 C.F.R. 763, Subpart E — Asbestos -Containing Materials in Schools, EPA 40 C.F.R. 763, Subpart G — Asbestos Worker Protection, EPA Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Standards for Accessible Design AASHTO — A Policy on Design Standards Interstate System AASHTO — Roadside Design Guide AASHTO — Roadway Lighting Design Guide AASHTO — A Policy for Geometric Design of Highways and Streets AASHTO — Highway Safety Manual Rule Chapter 5J-17, Florida Administrative Code (F.A.C.), Standards of Practice for Professional Surveyors and Mappers Chapter 469, Florida Statutes (F.S.) — Asbestos Abatement Rule Chapter 62-257, F.A.C., Asbestos Program Rule Chapter 62-302, F.A.C., Surface Water Quality Standards Code of Federal Regulations (C.F.R.) Florida Administrative Codes (F.A.C.) Chapters 20, 120, 215, 455, Florida Statutes (F.S.) — Florida COUNTY of Business & Professional Regulations Rules Florida COUNTY of Environmental Protection Rules FDOT Basis of Estimates Manual FDOT Computer Aided Design and Drafting (CADD) Manual FDOT Standard Plans FDOT Flexible Pavement Design Manual FDOT - Florida Roundabout Guide FDOT Handbook for Preparation of Specifications Package FDOT Standard Plans Instructions FDOT Manual of Uniform Minimum Standards for Design, Construction and Maintenance for Streets and Highways ("Florida Greenbook") FDOT Materials Manual FDOT Pavement Type Selection Manual FDOT Design Manual FDOT Procedures and Policies o FDOT Procurement Procedure 001-375-030, Compensation for CONSULTANT Travel Time on Professional Services Agreements FDOT Project Development and Environment Manual FDOT Project Traffic Forecasting Handbook FDOT Public Involvement Handbook FDOT Rigid Pavement Design Manual FDOT Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction FDOT Utility Accommodation Manual Manual on Speed Zoning for Highways, Roads, and Streets in Florida Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) - Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) FHWA — National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Report 672, Roundabouts: An Informational Guide FHWA Roadway Construction Noise Model (RCNM) and Guideline Handbook Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission - Standard Manatee Construction Conditions 2005 Florida Statutes (F.S.) Florida's Level of Service Standards and Guidelines Manual for Planning Model Guide Specifications — Asbestos Abatement and Management in Buildings, National Institute for Building Sciences (NIBS) Quality Assurance Guidelines Safety Standards Any special instructions from the COUNTY Roadway FDOT — Florida Intersection Design Guide FDOT - Project Traffic Forecasting Handbook FDOT - Quality/Level of Service Handbook Florida's Level of Service Standards and Highway Capacity Analysis for the SHS Transportation Research Board (TRB) - Highway Capacity Manual Permits Chapter 373, F.S. — Water Resources US Fish and Wildlife Service Endangered Species Programs Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission Protected Wildlife Permits Bridge Permit Application Guide, COMDTPUB PI6591.3C Building Permit Drainage FDOT Bridge Hydraulics Handbook FDOT Culvert Handbook FDOT Drainage Manual FDOT Erosion and Sediment Control Manual FDOT Exfiltration Handbook FDOT Hydrology Handbook FDOT Open Channel Handbook FDOT Optional Pipe Materials Handbook FDOT Storm Drain Handbook FDOT Stormwater Management Facility Handbook FDOT Temporary Drainage Handbook FDOT Drainage Connection Permit Handbook FDOT Bridge Scour Manual Survey and Mapping All applicable Florida Statutes and Administrative Codes Applicable Rules, Guidelines Codes and authorities of other Municipal, COUNTY, State and Federal Agencies. FDOT Aerial Surveying Standards for Transportation Projects Topic 550-020-002 FDOT Right of Way Mapping Handbook FDOT Surveying Procedure Topic 550-030-101 Florida COUNTY of Transportation Right of Way Procedures Manual Florida COUNTY of Transportation Surveying Handbook Right of Way Mapping Procedure 550-030-015 Traffic Engineering and Operations and ITS AASHTO - An Information Guide for Highway Lighting AASHTO - Guide for Development of Bicycle Facilities FHWA Standard Highway Signs Manual FDOT Manual on Uniform Traffic Studies (MUTS) FDOT Median Handbook FDOT Traffic Engineering Manual National Electric Safety Code National Electrical Code Florida's Turnpike Enterprise Florida's Turnpike Plans Preparation and Practices Handbook (TPPPH) Florida's Turnpike Lane Closure Policy Florida's Turnpike Drainage Manual Supplement Rigid Pavement Design Guide for Toll Locations with Electronic Toll Collection Flexible Pavement Design Guide for Toll Locations with Electronic Toll Collection Florida's Turnpike General Tolling Requirements (GTR) Additional Florida's Turnpike Enterprise standards, guides, and policies for design and construction can be found on the FTE Design Website: hitp:Hdesign.floridastumpike.com Traffic Monitoring American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC) Manual of Steel Construction, referred to as "AISC Specifications" American National Standards Institute (ANSI) RP-8-00 Recommended Practice for Roadway Lighting AASHTO AWS D1.1/ANSI Structural Welding Code — Steel AASHTO D1.5/AWS D1.5 Bridge Welding Code FHWA Traffic Detector Handbook FDOT General Interest Roadway Data Procedure FHWA Traffic Monitoring Guide FDOT's Traffic/Polling Equipment Procedures Structures AASHTO Load and Resistance Factor Design (LRFD) Bridge Design Specifications and Interims AASHTO LRFD Movable Highway Bridge Design Specifications and Interims AASHTO Standard Specifications for Structural Supports for Highway Signs, Luminaires and Traffic Signals, and Interims. AASHTO/-AWS-D1. 5M/D1.5: An American National Standard Bridge Welding Code AASHTO Guide Specifications for Structural Design of Sound Barriers AASHTO Manual for Condition Evaluation and Load and Resistance Factor Rating (LRFR) of Highway Bridges FDOT Bridge Load Rating Manual FDOT Structures Manual FDOT Structures Design Bulletins (available on FDOT Structures web site only) Geotechnical FHWA Checklist and Guidelines for Review of Geotechnical Reports and Preliminary Specifications Manual of Florida Sampling and Testing Methods Soils and Foundation Handbook Landscape Architecture Florida COUNTY of Agriculture and Consumer Services Grades and Standards for Nursery Plants Architectural Building Codes Florida Building Code: Building Fuel Gas Mechanical Plumbing Existing Building Florida Accessibility Code for Building Construction Rule Chapter 60D, F.A.C., Division of Building Construction Chapter 553, F.S. — Building Construction Standards ANSI Al 17.1 2003 Accessible and Usable Building and Facilities Titles 11 and 111, Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA), Public Law 101-336; and the ADA Accessibility Guidelines (ADAAG) Architectural — Fire Codes and Rules National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) - Life Safety Code NFPA 70 - National Electrical Code NFPA 101 - Life Safety Code NFPA 10 - Standard for Portable Fire Extinguishers NFPA 11 - Standard for Low -Expansion Foam Systems NFPA I IA - Standard for High- and Medium -Expansion Foam Systems NFPA 12 - Standard for Carbon Dioxide Extinguishing Systems NFPA 13 - Installation of Sprinkler Systems NFPA 30 - Flammable and Combustible Liquids Code NFPA 54 - National Gas Fuel Code NFPA 58 - LP -Gas Code Florida Fire Prevention Code as adopted by the State Fire Marshal — Consult with the Florida State Fire Marshal's office for other frequently used codes. Architectural — Extinguishing Systems NFPA 10 - Fire Extinguishers NFPA 13 - Sprinkler NFPA 14 - Standpipe and Hose System NFPA 17 - Dry Chemical NFPA 20 - Centrifugal Fire Pump NFPA 24 - Private Fire Service Mains NFPA 200 - Standard on Clean Agent Fire Extinguishing Systems Architectural — Detection and Fire Alarm Systems NFPA 70 - Electrical Code NFPA 72 - Standard for the Installation, Maintenance and Use of Local Protective Signaling Systems NFPA 72E - Automatic Fire Detectors NFPA 72G - Installation, Maintenance, and Use of Notification Appliances NFPA 72H -Testing Procedures for Remote Station and Proprietary Systems NFPA 74 - Household Fire Warning Equipment NFPA 75 - Protection of Electronic Computer Equipment Architectural — Mechanical Systems NFPA 90A - Air Conditioning and Ventilating Systems NFPA 92A - Smoke Control Systems NFPA 96 - Removal of Smoke and Grease -Laden Vapors from Commercial Cooking Equipment NFPA 204M - Smoke and Heating Venting Architectural — Miscellaneous Systems NFPA 45 - Laboratories Using Chemicals NFPA 80 - Fire Doors and Windows NFPA 88A - Parking Structures NFPA 105- Smoke and Draft -control Door Assemblies NFPA 110 - Emergency and Standby Power Systems NFPA 220 - Types of Building Construction NFPA 241 - Safeguard Construction, Alteration, and Operations Rule Chapter 69A-47, F.A.C., Uniform Fire Safety for Elevators Rule Chapter 69A-51, F.A.C., Boiler Safety Architectural — Energy Conservation Rule Chapter 60D-4, F.A.C., Rules for Construction and Leasing of State Buildings to Insure Energy Conservation Section 255.255, F.S., Life -Cycle Costs Architectural — Elevators Rule Chapter 61C-5, F.A.C., Florida Elevator Safety Code ASME A-17.1, Safety Code for Elevators and Escalators Architectural — Floodplain Management Criteria Section 255.25, F.S., Approval Required Prior to Construction or Lease of Buildings Rules of the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Architectural — Other Rule Chapter 64E-6, F.A.C., Standards for On Site Sewage Disposal Systems (Septic Tanks) Rule Chapter 62-600, F.A.C., Domestic Wastewater Facilities Rule Chapter 62-761, F.A.C., Underground Storage Tank Systems American Concrete Institute American Institute of Architects - Architect's Handbook of Professional Practice American Society for Testing and Materials - ASTM Standards Brick Institute of America DMS - Standards for Design of State Facilities Florida Concrete Products Association FDOT — ADA/Accessibility Procedure FDOT — Building Code Compliance Procedure FDOT — Design Build Procurement and Administration LEED (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design) Green Building Rating System National Concrete Masonry Association National Electrical Code Portland Cement Association - Concrete Masonry Handbook United State Green Building Council (USGBC) 2.22. Services to be Performed by the COUNTY When appropriate and /or available, the COUNTY will provide project data including: All certifications necessary for project letting. All information that may come to the COUNTY pertaining to future improvements. All future information that may come to the COUNTY during the term of the CONSULTANT's Agreement, which in the opinion of the COUNTY is necessary for the prosecution of the work. Available traffic and planning data. Engineering standards review services. All available information in the possession of the COUNTY pertaining to utility companies whose facilities may be affected by the proposed construction. All future information that may come to the COUNTY pertaining to subdivision plans so that the CONSULTANT may take advantage of additional areas that can be utilized as part of the existing right of way. Previously constructed Highway Beautification or Landscape Construction Plans Existing right of way maps (if available) PD&E Documents (if available) Design Reports (if available) Letters of authorization designating the CONSULTANT as an agent of the COUNTY in accordance with F.S. 337.274. Phase reviews of plans and engineering documents. Regarding Environmental Permitting Services: Approved Permit Document when available. Approval of all contacts with environmental agencies. General philosophies and guidelines of the COUNTY to be used in the fulfillment of this contract. Objectives, constraints, budgetary limitations, and time constraints will be completely defined by the Project Manager. Appropriate signatures on application forms. 3 PROJECT COMMON AND PROJECT GENERAL TASKS Project Common Tasks Project Common Tasks, as listed in the entirety of this section, are work efforts that are applicable to many project activities, 4 (Roadway Analysis) through 36 (313 Modeling). These tasks are to be included in the project scope in each applicable activity when the described work is to be performed by the CONSULTANT. Project Research: The CONSULTANT shall perform research of existing PD&E Studies, DCA, PUD and DRI documents for developments adjacent to the project for commitments regarding Right-of-way, Stormwater Management, Roadway Improvements, or any other commitments involving the interests of the COUNTY. The CONSULTANT shall anticipate up to ten (10) PUD's or DRI's approved by the COUNTY to be incorporated into the plans before the Phase IV plans submittal stage of the contract. After the Phase IV plans submittal incorporating additional DCA's, PUD's or DRI's shall be considered Additional Services. Cost Estimates: The CONSULTANT shall be responsible for producing an opinion of probable construction cost estimate and reviewing and updating the cost estimate at project milestones — Phase I (30%), II (60%), III (90%), and IV (100% or final) including the bid schedule. The CONSULTANT shall be responsible for inputting the pay items and quantities into a Summary of Pay Items sheet with all required Plans submittals as required. Technical Special Provisions: The CONSULTANT shall provide Technical Special Provisions for all items of work not covered by the FDOT Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction (2021) and recurring special provisions. Standard Specifications, recurring special provisions and supplemental specifications should not be modified unless absolutely necessary to control project specific requirements. The first nine sections of the FDOT standard specifications, recurring special provisions and supplemental specifications shall not be modified without written approval of the COUNTY. The Technical Special Provisions shall provide a description of work, materials, equipment and specific requirements, method of measurement and basis of payment. These provisions shall be formatted on 8-1/2"xl V sheets when printed or copied. Technical Special Provisions will be developed using Microsoft Word (.doc). Furnishing electronic copy in a format other than Microsoft Word or Adobe Acrobat (.pdf) will be considered Additional Services. Field Reviews: Includes all trips required to obtain necessary data for all elements of the project identified in this scope of work. Technical Meetings: The CONSULTANT shall attend all technical meetings necessary to execute the Scope of Services of this contract. This includes meetings with the COUNTY and FDOT or other Agency staff, between disciplines and CONSULTANT'S, such as access management meetings, pavement design meetings, local governments, progress review meetings (phase review), and miscellaneous meetings. The CONSULTANT shall prepare, and submit to the COUNTY'S Project Manager for review, the meeting minutes for all meetings attended by them. The meeting minutes are due within five (5) working days of attending the meeting. Quality Assurance/Quality Control: The CONSULTANT shall be accountable for the professional quality, technical accuracy and quality of their work. CONSULTANT prepared surveys, construction plans and contract documents that contain errors or omissions, and results in cost and time overruns on a construction project may result in a claim against the CONSULTANT per F.S. 337.015 (3). The CONSULTANT shall, through all stages of design and project construction, without additional compensation, correct all errors or deficiencies in the designs, maps, drawings, specifications and/or other services furnished by the CONSULTANT under this contract. Independent Peer Review: When directed by the COUNTY, a subconsultant may perform Independent Peer Reviews. Independent Peer Review and a ConstructabilityBiddability Review for design Phase Plans document submittals are required on this project. These separate reviews shall be completed by persons who have not worked on the plan component that is being reviewed. They could include but are not limited to a separate office under the Prime's umbrella, a subconsultant that is qualified in the work group being reviewed, or a CEI. It does not include persons who have knowledge of the day to day design efforts. The ConstructabilityBiddability Review shall be performed by a person with experience working on COUNTY construction projects (CEI, Contractor, etc.). The Independent Peer Review for design Phase Plans submittals shall ensure the plans meet the FDM, the FDOT Manual of Uniform Minimum Standards for Design, Construction and Maintenance for Streets and Highways ("Florida Greenbook"), Standard Plans and FDOT CADD Manual. The ConstructabilityBiddability Review shall ensure the project can be constructed and paid for as designed. ConstructabilityBiddability Reviews should be conducted prior to the 90% and Final submittals, using the FDOT Phase Review Checklist (Guidance Document 1-1-A) from the Construction Project Administration Manual (CPAM) as a minimum guideline. The CONSULTANT shall submit this checklist, as well as the "marked -up" set of plans during this review, and review comments and comment responses from any previous ConstructabilityBiddability reviews. These items will be reviewed by COUNTY's Project Manager. Supervision: The CONSULTANT shall supervise all technical design activities. Coordination: The CONSULTANT shall coordinate with all disciplines of the project to produce a final set of construction documents. 3.1 Public Involvement The CONSULTANT shall prepare for and attend (2) public meetings, one after the 30% Phase and one after the 60% Phase as directed by the COUNTY. Public involvement includes communicating to all interested persons, groups, and government organizations information regarding the development of the project. The CONSULTANT shall provide to the COUNTY drafts of all Public Involvement documents (i.e., newsletters, property owner letters, advertisements, etc.) associated with the following tasks for review and approval at least five (5) business days prior to printing and / or distribution. Public need will heavily influence construction schedule, construction phasing and maintenance of traffic for the project defined herein. The CONSULTANT shall develop coordinated project solutions that will maintain necessary public access during construction. The first public meeting will be scheduled after the 30% submittal. The goal of the public meeting will be to introduce the design phase of the project including the initial proposed access management plan to the public and receive feedback. The second public meeting will be scheduled after the 60% submittal and may be a public workshop. The goal of the public meeting will be to show all of the design components of the project to the public and receive feedback. The CONSULTANT shall process the public information received, discuss the results and integrate the needs of the public into the project while being mindful of economic feasibility and the needs of the project defined herein. The CONSULTANT will be expected to develop and provide all necessary exhibits for the public meetings. Collect Public Input — This activity occurs throughout the life of the project, requiring the CONSULTANT to maintain files, newspaper clippings, letters, emails, and, any record of direct contact before, during and after the Public Workshops. Input will be gathered during the Public Workshops, or by other methods, such as personal contact, letters, surveys, visits, phone calls, website comments in response to, or following said meeting. Comments and Coordination Report — A comments and coordination report shall be prepared, containing documentation of the public participation accomplished throughout the design period. This report should summarize and respond to the comments received from the public involvement workshops, agency coordination, etc. 3.1.1 Public Involvement Plan At the onset, the CONSULTANT will prepare a written Public Involvement Plan outlining each element of the project's public involvement strategy. The plan shall be updated and amended throughout the contract and indicate the basic public involvement approach to be taken with the project. It will list the contact persons, media officials, and agencies as well as the means that will be used to involve them in the process. The Public Involvement Plan shall include the creation and maintenance of a project specific website. The Public Involvement Plan will be submitted to the COUNTY for approval. 3.1.2 Notifications Upon receipt of the COUNTY's written approval of the Public Involvement Plan, letters shall be prepared and mailed by the CONSULTANT to local government elected officials. The letters shall be consistent with the Public Involvement Plan, introducing the CONSULTANT and informing officials of the project. Additional contacts shall be maintained throughout the study process as designated in the Public Involvement Plan. 3.1.3 Preparing Mailing Lists At the beginning of the project, The CONSULTANT shall identify all impacted property owners and tenants (within a minimum of 300 feet of the project corridor) The CONSULTANT will develop and maintain a computerized database of contacts, beginning with a list of those notified in the Kickoff Notification Process, Public officials, community service organizations, environmental agencies, local and regional transportation officials, and special interest groups shall be identified by the CONSULTANT as those individuals or groups to be affected by the project. The CONSULTANT shall prepare a mailing list of all such entities and shall update the mailing list as needed during the life of the project. 3.1.4 Median Modification Letters The CONSULTANT shall prepare a median modification letter to be sent to property owners along the corridor. In addition, the CONSULTANT shall prepare a sketch of each proposed median modification for inclusion in the letter. The letters will be sent on COUNTY letterhead. 3.1.5 Driveway Modification Letters The CONSULTANT shall prepare a driveway modification letter to be sent to property owners along the corridor. In addition, the CONSULTANT shall prepare a sketch of each proposed driveway modification for inclusion in the letter. The letters will be sent on COUNTY letterhead. 3.1.6 Newsletters If requested by the COUNTY, the CONSULTANT shall prepare newsletters for distribution to elected officials, public officials, property owners along the corridor and other interested parties. The letters will be sent by the CONSULTANT. 3.1.7 Renderings and Fly-Throughs The CONSULTANT shall prepare renderings and fly-throughs for use in public meetings. 3.1.8 PowerPoint Presentations If requested by the COUNTY, the CONSULTANT shall prepare PowerPoint presentations for use in public meetings. 3.1.9 Public Meeting Preparations The CONSULTANT shall prepare the necessary materials for use in all public meetings. The COUNTY will investigate potential meeting sites to advise the CONSULTANT on their suitability. The COUNTY will pay all costs for meeting site rents and insurance. 3.1.10 Public Meeting Attendance and Follow-up The CONSULTANT shall attend the public meeting, assist with meeting setup and take down. The CONSULTANT shall also prepare a summary of the public meeting that includes all copies of all materials shown or provided at the public meeting. The summary shall also include a listing of all written comments made during or after the meeting and responses to those written comments. The CONSULTANT will attend the meetings with an appropriate number of personnel to assist the COUNTY'S Project Manager. The CONSULTANT should anticipate two public information meetings during the design process. If a public hearing is necessary, this will be considered Additional Services. 3.1.11 Other Agency Meetings In addition to scheduled public meetings the CONSULTANT may be required to participate in meetings with local governing authorities and/or Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO). The CONSULTANT's participation may include, but not be limited to, presentations during the meeting, note taking, and summarizing the meeting in a memo to the file. It is estimated for this project there will be two (2) meetings with local governing authorities and/or MPOs during the design. 3.1.12 Web Site CONSULTANT will provide Public Involvement Graphics to COUNTY for the COUNTY Website. 3.2 Joint Project Agreements — N/A 3.3 Specifications Package Preparation The CONSULTANT shall prepare and provide a specifications package for those specifications NOT considered FDOT Standard Specifications. The CONSULTANT will obtain Lighting and Traffic Signal Specifications from the County's Traffic Operations website. The specifications package shall address all items and areas of work and include any Mandatory Specifications, Modified Special Provisions, and Technical Special Provisions. The specifications package must be submitted for review to the COUNTY's Project Manager at least 30 days prior to the 90% plans submittal. This submittal does not require signing and sealing and shall be coordinated through the COUNTY's Project Manager. The CONSULTANT shall coordinate with the COUNTY on the submittal requirements, but at a minimum shall consist of (1) the complete specifications package, (2) a copy of the marked -up workbook used to prepare the package, and (3) a copy of the final project plans. Final submittal of the specifications package must occur at least 10 working days prior to the Final/100% plan submittal. This submittal shall be signed, dated, and sealed in accordance with applicable Florida Statutes. 3.4 Contract Maintenance and Project Documentation Contract maintenance includes project management effort for complete setup and maintenance of files, electronic folders and documents, developing technical monthly progress reports and schedule updates. Project documentation includes the compilation and delivery of final documents, reports or calculations that support the development of the contract plans; includes uploading files to an FTP server. 3.5 Value Engineering (Multi -Discipline Team) Review The COUNTY may request a Value Engineering Review after the 30% Plans Submittal. At which time, the CONSULTANT will prepare for and participate in a Value Engineering Review of the Plans. 3.6 Prime Consultant Project Manager Meetings Includes only the Prime Consultant Project Manager's time for travel and attendance at Activity Technical Meetings and other meetings listed in the meeting summary for Task 3.6 on tab 3 Project General Task of the staff hour forms. Staff hours for other personnel attending Activity Technical Meetings are included in the meeting task for that specific Activity. 3.7 Plans Update The effort needed for Plans Update services will vary from project to project, depending on size and complexity of the project, as well as the duration of time spent "on the shelf'. Specific services will be negotiated as necessary as a contract amendment. 3.8 Post Design Services Post Design Services are included in this contract and may include, but are not limited to, meetings, construction assistance (responding to RFI's), plans revisions, shop drawing review services, survey services, as -built drawings, and load ratings. Post Design Services are not intended for instances of CONSULTANT errors and/or omissions. All CONSULTANT contact with the Contractor shall be made through the COUNTY'S Construction Project Manager. The CONSULTANT shall not contact the Contractor directly unless there is a possible immediate threat to public health and/or safety. The COUNTY'S Construction Project Manager must be contacted immediately thereafter. The COUNTY CEI is responsible for confirming that all quality control testing and requirements of the approved Quality Control Plan have been executed and the results are satisfactory per the design requirements. The CONSULTANT shall visit the construction site at key phases of the project to verify as -built conditions. This will require the CONSULTANT to coordinate with the COUNTY'S Project Manager during construction and attend construction meetings as required or requested by the COUNTY. The CONSULTANT shall meet with the COUNTY'S Project Manager during the Quality Control submittal/review to establish the anticipated stages of construction. The CONSULTANT must notify the COUNTY'S Project Manager of any design related issues as soon as possible. It is important that all significant changes made during construction be documented by the CONTRACTOR in the final as -built plans. The CONTRACTOR shall markup sheets requiring minor (non -engineering analysis) as -built changes and show those changes on the Final Signed and Sealed As -Built Signature Sheet(s). Major changes resulting in issuance of revised contract documents must also be included in the as -built package and recorded appropriately on the Final Signed and Sealed As -built Signature Sheet(s). CONSULTANT will provide electronic Plans to CONTRACTOR for preparation of As -Built Drawings by CONTRACTOR. Any changes proposed by the Contractor must be signed and sealed by the Contractor's FOR and approved by the CONSULTANT. This may be a Cost Savings Initiative Proposal (CSIP) redesign or an original design of certain components including Shop Drawings. All original documents obtained by the CONSULTANT will be turned over to the COUNTY at the project's close-out or upon request by the COUNTY. All documents obtained for inclusion in the Final As -Built Documents Package must be Quality Control reviewed by the CONSULTANT to ensure correctness and legibility. The CONSULTANT shall contact the COUNTY if any deficiencies are identified. The Final As -Built Documents Package Certification(s) must be digitally signed and sealed by the CEI Consultant Quality assurance material testing will be the responsibility of the CONTRACTOR. 3.9 Digital Delivery The CONSULTANT shall deliver final contract plans and documents in digital format (PDF and CAD). The final contract plans, and documents shall be digitally signed, and sealed files delivered to the COUNTY on acceptable electronic media, as determined by the COUNTY. Deliverables shall be provided in both pdf and CADD formats. 3.10Risk Management The CONSULTANT shall identify potential risks associated with design and construction of the project. Risks may include but not be limited to environmental conditions, public opposition, economic conditions, material costs, right of way costs, utility involvement, permitting delays, loss of key personnel, etc. The CONSULTANT shall provide to the COUNTY a Risk Management Plan following the procedures outlined in FDOT's Project Management Handbook, Chapter 19, preceding the development of 30% design plans. 3.11Railroad, Transit and/or Airport Coordination — N/A 3.11.1 Aeronautical Evaluation — N/A 3.12 Landscape and Existing Vegetation Coordination Coordinate with the COUNTY'S Project Manager to ensure preservation and protection of existing vegetation. Relocation of existing vegetation may be necessary in some cases. Space for proposed landscape should be preserved and conflicts with drainage, utilities, ITS, and signage should be minimized. Coordination with the COUNTY'S Landscape Architect (Pamela.Lulich@colliercountyfl.gov) may be necessary as defined in 4.12. 3.13 Transit Coordination The CONSULTANT shall coordinate with the COUNTY's Project Manager and Transit Coordinator to include any features needed by the Collier Area Transit (CAT). 3.14 Other Project General Tasks The CONSULTANT shall assist the COUNTY during the construction bidding phase of the project including, but not limited to, attending the pre -bid meeting, addressing addendum, evaluating bids and bidders, and providing written letters of recommendation. 4 ROADWAY ANALYSIS The CONSULTANT shall analyze and document Roadway Tasks in accordance with all applicable manuals, guidelines, standards, handbooks, procedures, and current design memorandums. 4.1 Typical Section Package The CONSULTANT shall provide a Typical Section Package for approval by the COUNTY prior to the first 30% plan submittal as described in Section 2.0. Minor modifications (if required) shall be incorporated and submitted for final approval by the COUNTY. 4.2 Pavement Type Selection Report - N/A 4.3 Pavement Design Package The CONSULTANT shall provide an approved Pavement Design Package at the 30% plan submittal. The COUNTY shall approve the Pavement Design prior to proceeding with the 60% design. 4.4 Cross -Slope Correction — As needed. The CONSULTANT shall investigate any existing pavement to be retained as part of the new roadway and include in the design any required correction of existing cross -slopes. Cross slope information will be collected at 100' intervals. After the analysis of the cross slopes a recommendation will be provided as part of the pavement report. The CONSULTANT will coordinate with Collier County Maintenance to help identify any known locations which may be deficient. 4.5 Horizontal/Vertical Master Design Files The CONSULTANT shall design the geometries using the design standards that are most appropriate with proper consideration given to the design traffic volumes, design speed, capacity and levels of service, functional classification, adjacent land use, design consistency and driver expectancy, aesthetics, existing vegetation to be preserved, pedestrian and bicycle concerns, ADA requirements, Safe Mobility For Life Program, access management, PD&E documents, and scope of work. The CONSULTANT shall also develop utility conflict information to be provided to the project Utility Coordinator in the format requested by the COUNTY. 4.6 Access Management The CONSULTANT shall incorporate access management standards for the project in coordination with COUNTY staff. The CONSULTANT shall review the access management recommendations as stated in the FDOT PD&E Study. The CONSULTANT shall ensure the PD&E Study adopted access management standards and the existing access conditions (signalized intersection spacing, median opening spacing, and connection spacing) are acceptable to the COUNTY. The 30% plans will incorporate the recommended and approved access management plan which shall define which median openings will be closed, relocated, or substantially altered or new. 4.7 Roundabout Evaluation — N/A 4.8 Roundabout Final Design Analysis — N/A 4.9 Cross Section Design Files The CONSULTANT shall establish and develop cross section design files in accordance with the FDOT CADD manual. The CONSULTANT shall Coordinate with all utility owners to obtain the location of subsurface facilities. Both existing locations and proposed relocations of all utilities shall be shown on the cross sections. 4.10 Temporary Traffic Control Plan (TTCP) Analysis The CONSULTANT shall design a safe and effective TTCP to move vehicular and pedestrian traffic during all phases of construction. The design shall include construction phasing of temporary and permanent roadways ingress and egress to existing property owners and businesses, routing, signing and pavement markings, and detour quantity tabulations, roadway pavement, drainage structures, ditches, front slopes, back slopes, drop offs within clear zone, transit stops, and traffic monitoring sites. Special consideration shall be given to the construction of the drainage system when developing the construction phases. Positive drainage must always be maintained. The design shall include construction phasing of roadways to accommodate the construction or relocation of utilities when the contract includes Joint Project Agreements (JPAs). It is anticipated that the plans will be Level II Traffic Control Plans. The CONSULTANT shall investigate the need for temporary traffic signals, temporary lighting, alternate detour roads, and the use of materials such as sheet piling in the analysis. The Traffic Control Plan shall be prepared by a certified designer who has completed training as required by the FDOT. Before proceeding with the Traffic Control Plan, the CONSULTANT shall meet with the appropriate COUNTY personnel. The purpose of this meeting is to provide information to the CONSULTANT that will better coordinate the Preliminary and Final TTCP efforts. The CONSULTANT shall consider the local impact of any lane closures or alternate routes. When the need to close a road is identified during this analysis, the CONSULTANT shall notify the COUNTY's Project Manager as soon as possible. Proposed road closings must be reviewed and approved by the COUNTY. Diligence shall be used to minimize negative impacts by appropriate specifications, recommendations or plans development. Local impacts to consider will be local events, holidays, peak seasons, detour route deterioration and other eventualities. CONSULTANT shall be responsible to obtain local authorities' permission for use of detour routes not on state highways. 4.11 Master TTCP Design Files The CONSULTANT shall develop master TTCP files (Level II) showing each phase of the TTCP. This includes all work necessary for designing lane configurations, diversions, lane shifts, signing and pavement markings, temporary traffic control devices, and temporary pedestrian ways. 4.12 Selective Clearing and Grubbing a. Selective Clearing and Grubbing of Existing Vegetation Field Assessment The CONSULTANT shall review information from the COUNTY and conduct a project field assessments(s) of existing vegetation by a certified Arborist. At least one field assessment visit is to be attended by the COUNTY'S Project Manager. The Result of the Field Assessments(s) will determine the course of action for Selective Clearing and Grubbing and the extent of the Vegetation Survey under Task 2.10. b. Selective Clearing and Grubbing Site Inventory Analysis of Existing Vegetation and Cross -Discipline Coordination (OPTIONAL SERVICES) The CONSULTANT shall coordinate with the COUNTY'S Public Utility, Stormwater, and Traffic Operation to ensure that preservation of existing vegetation is coordinated between all disciplines. Coordinate with the COUNTY'S Project Manager. Based on the field assessment, the CONSULTANT may be required to do a site inventory analysis of existing vegetation, opportunities for preservation and protection of existing vegetation, relocation options, and selective removal of nuisance and/or non - nuisance vegetation. Coordinate with surveyor to have trees and vegetation tagged and surveyed, per tasks 27.28 or 27.29. c. Selective Clearing and Grubbing- Existing Vegetation Maintenance Report The CONSULTANT shall include in the plans' instructions for the care and maintenance of the plant preservation areas, and selective clearing and grubbing areas throughout the construction period. The CONSULTANT will coordinate with the Collier County Landscape Architect to ensure that the intent of the plant preservation areas is in alignment with future highway landscape plans. The CONSULTANT should be knowledgeable in arboricultural practices to the extent that they are able to deliver detailed and informed Selective Clearing and Grubbing Plans. 4.13 Tree Disposition Plans CONSULTANT will prepare a Tree Disposition Plan outlining the requirements for the relocation and protection of trees located within the project boundaries. The CONSULTANT will utilize the information collected from the Vegetation Survey and information collected under task 4.12 for Selective Clearing and Grubbing. 4.14 Design Variations and Exceptions -N/A 4.15 Design Report The CONSULTANT shall prepare all applicable report(s) as listed in the Project Description section of this scope. The CONSULTANT shall submit to the COUNTY design notes, data, and calculations to document the design conclusions reached during the development of the contract plans. The design notes, data, and computations shall be recorded on size 8'/z"xI V sheets, fully titled, numbered, dated, indexed and signed by the designer and the checker. Computer output forms and other oversized sheets shall be folded to 8'/z"xI l" size. The data shall be in a hardback folder for submittal to the COUNTY. Digital copies of all paper submittals above shall be provided in pdf or Microsoft Word format. 4.16 Quantities The CONSULTANT shall develop accurate quantities and the supporting documentation, including construction days when required. 4.17 Cost Estimate The CONSULTANT shall provide the Engineer's Estimate of Probable Cost at each submittal phase. The Engineer's Estimate of Probable Cost shall be updated and adjusted at each submittal to be maintained up to and including final bid documents submittal. 4.18 Technical Special Provisions and Modified Special Provisions The CONSULTANT shall provide Technical Special Provisions for all items of work not covered by the FDOT Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction and recurring special provisions. Standard Specifications, recurring special provisions and supplemental specifications should not be modified unless necessary to control project specific requirements. All modifications to other sections must be justified to the COUNTY to be included in the project's specifications package as Technical Special Provisions. The Technical Special Provisions shall provide a description of work, materials, equipment and specific requirements, method of measurement and basis of payment. These provisions shall be submitted electronically (PDF's). 4.19 Other Roadway Analyses This scope item is considered an Additional/Optional Service if requested by the COUNTY. Fees for this item are not included in the negotiated contract fees. If this item is determined necessary and is requested by the COUNTY, scope and fee will be negotiated at that time and will be implemented via Change Order. When applicable, the staff hourly rates established in the contract shall be utilized for fee determination. 4.20 Field Reviews The CONSULTANT shall include and be available to attend a plans -in -hand field review with the COUNTY at the 60%, and 90% and 100% submittals. Field reviews will be conducted upon completion of COUNTY reviews of plans submitted by the CONSULTANT for each submittal period. The anticipated format for these meetings will be an in -office review of COUNTY comments in the morning followed by an afternoon field visit to areas of concern at the project site. This item also includes all trips required to obtain necessary data for all elements of the roadway analysis identified in this scope of work. 4.21 Monitor Existing Structures The CONSULTANT shall perform field observations to visually identify existing structures within the project limits which may require settlement, vibration or groundwater monitoring by the contractor during construction in accordance with FDM Chapter 307. The CONSULTANT shall coordinate with and assist the geotechnical engineer and/or structural engineer to identify those structures and develop mitigation strategies (when applicable). The CONSULTANT shall identify the necessary pay items to be included in the bid documents to monitor existing structures. 4.22 Technical Meetings Includes; meetings with the COUNTY or other Agency staff, between disciplines and CONSULTANTS, such as access management meetings, pavement design meetings, progress review meetings (phase review), and miscellaneous meetings necessary for all elements of the roadway analysis identified in this scope of work. 4.23 Quality Assurance/Quality Control The CONSULTANT shall be responsible for the professional quality, technical accuracy and coordination of all surveys, designs, drawings, specifications and other services furnished by the CONSULTANT under this contract. 4.24 Independent Peer Review Please see Section 3.0. 4.25 Supervision Includes all efforts required to supervise all technical design activities. 4.26 Coordination Includes all efforts to coordinate all elements of the roadway analysis to produce a final set of construction documents. 5 ROADWAY PLANS The CONSULTANT shall prepare Roadway, Drainage, TTCP, Utility Adjustment Sheets, plan sheets, notes, and details as shown in the FDM Summary of Phase Submittals Table 301.2.2. The plans shall include the following sheets necessary to convey the intent and scope of the project for the purposes of construction. 5.1. Key Sheet 5.2. Summary of Pay Items Including Quantity Input 5.3. Drainage Map Sheets 5.4. Typical Section Sheets 5.5. Typical Sections 5.6. Typical Section Details 5.7. General Notes/Pay Item Notes 5.8. Summary of Quantities Sheets 5.9. Summary of Drainage Structures Sheets 5.10.Optional Material Tabulation Sheet 5.11. Project Layout Sheets 5.12. Plan/Profile Sheet 5.13. Profile Sheet -N/A 5.14. Plan Sheet — N/A 5.15.5.10 Special Profile 5.16.5.11 Back -of -Sidewalk Profile Sheet 5.17. Interchange Layout Sheet — N/A 5.18. Ramp Terminal Details (Plan View) — N/A 5.19.Intersection Layout Details 5.20. Drainage Structure Sheets 5.21. Stormwater Facilities Sheets 5.22. Special Details 5.23. Cross -Section Pattern Sheets 5.24. Roadway Soil Survey Sheets 5.25. Cross Sections 5.26. Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan Sheets 5.27. Temporary Traffic Control Plan Sheets 5.28. Temporary Traffic Control Cross Section Sheets 5.29. Temporary Traffic Control Detail Sheets 5.30. Utility Adjustment Sheets The Utility adjustment/relocation design shall accommodate provisions for location of foundation elements for the future flyover bridge structure (to be constructed in Phase 2) to avoid potential conflicts between proposed utility layout as part of Phase 1 design with foundations for the future flyover. 5.31. Selective Clearing and Grubbing Sheets 5.31.1.1. Selective Clearing and Grubbing 5.31.1.2. Selective Clearing and Grubbing Details 5.32. Tree Disposition Plan Sheets 5.32.1.1. Tree Disposition Plan Sheets Tree Disposition Plan Sheets will be signed and sealed drawings showing the location and vertical/horizontal landscape design of the vegetation to be relocated. The Tree Disposition Plans will be produced at the scale of the roadway drawings or at a scale that best depicts the information. Interchange and details will be shown at no larger than a 1" =50' scale. 5.32.1.2. Tree Disposition Plan Tables and Schedules 5.33.Project Control Sheets 5.34. Environmental Detail Sheets — N/A 5.35. Utility Verification Sheets (SUE Data) 5.36. Quality Assurance/Quality Control 5.37. Supervision 6 DRAINAGE ANALYSIS The CONSULTANT shall analyze and document Drainage Tasks in accordance with all applicable manuals, guidelines, standards, handbooks, procedures, and current design memorandums. The CONSULTANT shall make drainage design recommendations to the COUNTY for the type of drainage system that should be used for the project, i.e., closed -drainage system and/or open roadside ditches. Once the drainage system is accepted and approved by the SFWMD, and the Notice of Intent to Permit from SFWMD is received, any changes to the system, requested by the COUNTY, shall be considered as Additional Services. The CONSULTANT is responsible for designing a drainage and stormwater management system that complies with the requirements of the appropriate regulatory agencies (SFWMD) and the FDOT's Drainage Manual. The CONSULTANT shall coordinate fully with the appropriate permitting agencies and COUNTY staff. All activities and submittals should be coordinated through the COUNTY's Project Manager. The work will include the engineering analyses for any or all the following: 6.1 Drainage Analysis 6.1.1 Drainage Map Hydrology The CONSULTANT shall create a (pre- and/or post -condition) working drainage basin map to be used in defining the system hydrology. This map shall incorporate drainage basin boundaries, existing survey and/or LiDAR and field observations, as necessary, to define the system. Basin delineations shall also include any existing collection systems in a logical manner to aid in the development of the hydraulic model. Include coordination hours needed to convey drainage hydrologic features onto produced drainage maps. Examine all adjacent property outfall points to determine whether accommodations for offsite drainage must be incorporated into the project drainage system. 6.1.2 Base Clearance Calculations The CONSULTANT shall analyze, determine, and document high water elevations per basin which will be used to set roadway profile grade and roadway materials. Determine surface water elevations at cross drains, floodplains, outfalls and adjacent stormwater ponds. Determine groundwater elevations at intervals between the above -mentioned surface waters. Document findings in a Drainage Report. 6.1.3 Pond Siting Analysis and Report — (See 9.0 PD&E Reevaluations and Technical Support) Although pond sites have been evaluated in the PD&E Study, it is likely that alternative pond site locations (not considered in the PD&E) will become an option for this project. Evaluate pond sites using a preliminary hydrologic analysis. Document the results and coordination for all the project's pond site analyses. The Drainage Manual provides specific documentation requirements. 6.1.4 Design of Cross Drains — N/A 6.1.5 Design of Ditches & Canal Re -alignment Design roadway conveyance. This task includes capacity calculations, longitudinal grade adjustments, flow changes, additional adjustments for ditch convergences, selection of suitable channel lining, design of side drainpipes, and documentation. (Design of linear stormwater management facilities in separate task.) Design Canal Re -alignment. All right of way acquisition (for Phase 1 and Phase 2) is included in the Phase 1 Interim Improvement. The Phase 2 Ultimate Improvement will trigger the need to realign the Cocohatchee Canal and extend the existing box culvert along the Corkscrew Canal which is under Immokalee Road. This task includes capacity calculations, longitudinal grade adjustments, flow changes, additional adjustments for canal convergences, selection of suitable canal lining, and documentation so that additional right of way limits can be accurately identified. 6.1.6 Design of Stormwater Management Facility (Offsite or Infield Pond) Design stormwater management facilities to meet requirements for stormwater quality treatment, attenuation and aesthetics. Develop proposed pond layout (contributing drainage basin, shape, contours, slopes, volumes, tie-ins, aesthetics, etc.), perform routing, pollutant/nutrient loading calculations, recovery calculations, design the outlet control structure and buoyancy calculations for pond liners when necessary. 6.1.7 Design of Stormwater Management Facility (Roadside Treatment Swales and Linear Ponds) - N/A 6.1.8 Design of Floodplain Compensation Determine floodplain encroachments, coordinate with regulatory agencies, and develop proposed compensation area layout (shape, contours, slopes, volumes, etc.). Document the design following the requirements of the regulatory agency. 6.1.9 Design of Storm Drains Delineate contributing drainage areas, determine runoff, inlet locations, and spread. Calculate hydraulic losses (friction, utility conflict and, if necessary, minor losses). Determine design tailwater and, if necessary, outlet scour protection. 6.1.10 Optional Culvert Material Determine acceptable options for pipe materials using the Culvert Service Life Estimator. 6.1.11 French Drain Systems — N/A 6.1.11a Existing French Drain Systems — N/A 6.1.12 Drainage Wells — N/A 6.1.13 Drainage Design Documentation Report Compile drainage design documentation into report format. Include documentation for all the drainage design tasks and associated meetings and decisions. 6.1.14 Bridge Hydraulic Report Prepare preliminary bridge hydraulics report to support 30% design for bridge culvert extension and canal realignment design as required. 6.1.15 Temporary Drainage Analysis Evaluate and address drainage to adequately drain the road and maintain existing offsite drainage during all construction phases. Provide documentation. 6.1.16 Cost Estimate Prepare cost estimates for the drainage components. 6.1.17 Technical Special Provisions / Modified Special Provisions 6.1.18 Hydroplaning Analysis — N/A 6.1.19 Existing Permit Analysis Data gathering including desktop analysis of local, state and federal Drainage permits. 6.1.20 Other Drainage Analysis Includes all efforts for a drainage task not covered by an existing defined task. 6.1.21 Noise Barrier Evaluation — N/A 6.1.22 Field Reviews 6.1.23 Technical Meetings Meetings with COUNTY staff, regulatory agencies, local governments such as meetings with the Water Management District, FDEP, etc. 6.1.24 Environmental Look -Around Meetings Convene a meeting with COUNTY staff, regulatory agencies, local governments and other stakeholders to explore watershed wide stormwater needs and alternative permitting approaches. 6.1.25 Quality Assurance/Quality Control 6.1.26 Independent Peer Review 6.1.27 Supervision 6.1.28 Coordination 6.2 DRAINAGE PLANS The CONSULTANT shall prepare Drainage plan sheets, notes, and details. The plans shall include the following sheets necessary to convey the intent and scope of the project for the purposes of construction. 6.2.1 Drainage Map 6.2.2 Bridge Hydraulics Recommendation Sheets — N/A 6.2.3 Summary of Drainage Structures 6.2.4 Optional Pipe/Culvert Material 6.2.5 Drainage Structure Sheet(s) (Per Structure) 6.2.6 Miscellaneous Drainage Detail Sheets 6.2.7 Lateral Ditch Plan/Profile (for Cocohatchee Canal Re -alignment) 6.2.8 Lateral Ditch Cross Sections — N/A 6.2.9 Retention/Detention Pond Detail Sheet(s) 6.2.10 Retention Pond Cross Sections 6.2.11 Erosion Control Plan Sheet(s) 6.2.12 SWPPP Sheet(s) 6.2.13 Quality Assurance/Quality Control 6.2.14 Supervision 7 UTILITIES The CONSULTANT shall identify utility facilities and secure agreements, utility work schedules, and plans from the Utility Agency Owners (UAO) ensuring all conflicts that exist between utility facilities and the COUNTY's construction project are addressed. The CONSULTANT shall follow FDOT and COUNTY standards, policies, procedures and design criteria. COUNTY standards are located at: http://www.collier oe v.net/your-eovemment/divisions-s-z/water/utilities-standards-manual 7.1 Utility Kickoff Meeting Before any contact with the UAO(s), the CONSULTANT shall meet with the COUNTY Transportation Engineering Division and Public Utilities Department to receive guidance, as may be required, to assure that all necessary coordination will be accomplished in accordance with COUNTY procedures. CONSULTANT shall bring a copy of the design project work schedule reflecting utility activities. 7.2 Identify Existing Utility Agency Owner(s) The CONSULTANT shall identify all utilities within and adjacent to the project limits that may be impacted by the project. 7.3 Make Utility Contacts First Contact: The CONSULTANT shall send letters, a PDF of plans, and CAD files if requested to each utility. Includes contact by phone for meeting coordination. Request type, size, location, easements, and cost for relocation if reimbursement is claimed. Request the voltage level for power lines in the project area. Send UAO requests for reimbursement to COUNTY for a legal opinion. Include the meeting schedule (if applicable) and the design schedule. Include typical meeting agenda. If scheduling a meeting, give 3 weeks advance notice. Second Contact: At a minimum of 4 weeks prior to the meeting, the CONSULTANT shall transmit a PDF of complete 60% plans and the utility conflict information (when applicable and in the format requested by the COUNTY) to each UAO having facilities located within the project limits, and to the COUNTY as required by the COUNTY's Project Manager. Third Contact: Identify agreements and assemble packages. The CONSULTANT shall send agreements, letters, the utility conflict information (when applicable and in the format requested by the COUNTY) and a PDF set of plans to the UAO(s) and the COUNTY including all component sets. Include the design schedule. 7.4 Exception Processing The CONSULTANT shall be responsible for transmitting/coordinating the appropriate design reports including, but not limited to, the Preliminary Engineering Report and the Project Scope to each UAO to identify any condition that may require a Utility Exception. The CONSULTANT shall identify and communicate to the UAO any facilities in conflict with their location or project schedule. The CONSULTANT shall assist with the processing of design exceptions involving Utilities with the UAO and the COUNTY. Assist with processing per the UAM. 7.5 Preliminary Utility Meeting The CONSULTANT shall schedule (time and place), notify participants, and conduct a preliminary utility meeting with all UAO(s) having facilities located within the project limits for the purpose of presenting the project, review the current design schedule, evaluate the utility information collected, provide follow-up information on compensable property rights from the COUNTY Legal Office, discuss the utility work by highway contractor option with each utility, and discuss any future design issues that may impact utilities. This is also an opportunity for the UAO(s) to present proposed facilities. The CONSULTANT shall keep accurate minutes and distribute a copy to all attendees. 7.6 Individual/Field Meetings The CONSULTANT shall meet with each UAO as necessary, separately or together, throughout the project design duration to provide guidance in the interpretation of plans, review changes to the plans and schedules, standard or selective clearing and grubbing work, and assist in the development of the UAO(s) plans and work schedules. The CONSULTANT is responsible for motivating the UAO to complete and return the necessary documents after each Utility Contact or Meeting. 7.7 Collect and Review Plans and Data from UAO(s) The CONSULTANT shall review utility marked plans and data individually as they are received for content. Ensure information from the UAO (utility type, material and size) is sent to the designer for inclusion in the plans. Forward all requests for utility reimbursement and supporting documentation to the COUNTY. 7.8 Subordination of Easements Coordination — N/A 7.9 Utility Design Meeting The CONSULTANT shall schedule (time and place), notify participants, and conduct a Utility meeting with all affected UAO(s). The CONSULTANT shall be prepared to discuss impacts to existing trees/vegetation and proposed landscape, drainage, traffic signalization, temporary traffic control plans (TTCP) (construction phasing), review the current design schedule and letting date, evaluate the utility information collected, provide follow-up information on compensable property rights from COUNTY Legal Office, discuss with each UAO the utility work by highway contractor option, discuss any future design issues that may impact utilities, etc., to the extent that they may have an effect on existing or proposed utility facilities with particular emphasis on drainage and TTCP with each UAO. The intent of this meeting shall be to assist the UAOs in identifying and resolving conflicts between utilities and proposed construction before completion of the plans, including utility adjustment details. Also, to work with the UAOs to recommend potential resolution between known utility conflicts with proposed construction plans as may be deemed practical by the UAO. The CONSULTANT shall keep accurate minutes of all meetings and distribute a copy to all attendees within 3 days. See Task 4.5 (Horizontal/Vertical Master Design File) and Task 4.9 (Cross Section Design Files) for utility conflict location identification and adjustments. 7.IOReview Utility Markups & Work Schedules and Processing of Schedules & Agreements The CONSULTANT shall review utility marked up plans and work schedules as they are received for content and coordinate review with the designer. Send color markups and schedules to the appropriate COUNTY office(s) such as survey, geotechnical, drainage, structures, lighting, roadway, signals, utilities, landscape architecture, municipalities, maintaining agency, and COUNTY Traffic Operations for review and comment. Coordinate with the COUNTY for execution. Distribute Executed Final Documents. Prepare Work Order for UAO(s). The CONSULTANT shall coordinate with the COUNTY PUD the programming of necessary Work Program funds. 7.11Utility Coordination/Follow-up The CONSULTANT shall provide utility coordination and follow up. This includes follow-up, interpreting plans, and assisting the UAOs with completion of their work schedules and agreements. Includes phone calls, face-to-face meetings, etc., to motivate and ensure the UAO(s) complete and return the required documents in accordance with the project schedule. Ensure the resolution of all known conflicts. The CONSULTANT shall keep accurate minutes of all meetings and distribute a copy to all attendees. This task can be applied to all phases of the project. 7.12Utility Constructability Review The CONSULTANT shall review utility schedules against construction contract time, and phasing for compatibility. 7.13Additional Utility Services The CONSULTANT shall provide additional utility services. The CONSULTANT shall, via soft -dig, potholing, or other non- destructive method, physically obtain the horizontal and vertical location, size, type, material, and condition, of all underground utilities within and surrounding all proposed foundations for signal poles, light poles, retaining walls, piles, culverts, or other critical locations where foundation construction is proposed, or as directed by the COUNTY'S Construction Project Manager. A quantity of 50 underground locates (Vvh's) are anticipated for this project and is included in this Scope of Services 7.141'rocessing Utility Work by Highway Contractor (UWHC) This includes coordination of utility design effort between the COUNTY and the UAO(s). The CONSULTANT shall conduct additional coordination meetings, prepare and process the agreements, review tabulation of quantities, perform UWHC constructability and biddability review, review pay items, cost estimates and Technical Special Provisions (TSP) or Modified Special Provision (MSP) prepared by the UAO. This does not include the utility design effort. This item will be added as a supplemental agreement when the need is identified. 7.15Contract Plans to UAO(s) The CONSULTANT shall transmit the contract plans as processed for lctting to the UAO(s). Transmittals to UAO(s) may be by certified mail, return receipt requested. 7.16 C ertification/Close-Out This includes hours for transmitting utility files to the COUNTY and preparation of the Utility Certification Letter. The CONSULTANT shall certify to the COUNTY Project Manager the following: All utility negotiations (Full execution of each agreement, approved Utility Work Schedules, Technical Special Provisions or Modified Special Provisions written, etc.) have been completed with arrangements made for utility work to be undertaken and completed as required for proper coordination with the physical construction schedule. OR An on -site inspection was made, and no utility work will be involved. OR Plans were sent to the Utility Companies/Agencies and no utility work is required. OR A No Response letter on COUNTY letter, delivered to the UAO via certified mail, return receipt requested, documenting all failed attempts to obtain RGBs, UWS or No Conflict letter from any non -responsive UAO. 7.170ther Utilities This scope item is considered an Additional/Optional Service if requested by the COUNTY. Fees for this item are not included in the negotiated contract fees. If this item is determined necessary and is requested by the COUNTY, scope and fee will be negotiated at the time and will be implemented via Change Order or Contract Amendment. When applicable, the staff hourly rates established in the contract shall be utilized for fee determination. 8 ENVIRONMENTAL PERMITS and ENVIRONMENTAL CLEARANCES The CONSULTANT shall notify the COUNTY Project Manager, and other appropriate COUNTY personnel in advance of all scheduled meetings with the regulatory agencies to allow a COUNTY representative to attend. The CONSULTANT shall copy in the COUNTY Project Manager and the Environmental Permit Coordinator on all permit related correspondence and meetings. The CONSULTANT shall use current regulatory guidelines and policies for all permits required as identified in Section 2.4. 8.1 Preliminary Project Research The CONSULTANT shall perform preliminary project research and shall be responsible for regulatory agency coordination to assure that design efforts are properly directed toward permit requirements. The research shall include but should not be limited to a review of the project's PD&E documents including the Type 2 Categorical Exclusion, Natural Resources Evaluation Report, Contamination Screening Evaluation Report, Pond Siting Report, and Cultural Resources Assessment Survey Report. The CONSULTANT shall research any existing easements or other restrictions that may exist within or adjacent to the proposed project boundary. Project research may include but should not be limited to review of available: federal, state, and local permit files and databases; and local government information including COUNTY and property appraiser data. The CONSULTANT shall determine if any Sovereign Submerged Lands easements need to be modified or acquired. Any applicable information will be shown on the plans as appropriate. 8.2 Field Work 8.2.1 Pond Site Alternatives — See Section 9.0 PD&E Reevaluation and Technical Support 8.2.2 Establish Wetland Jurisdictional Lines and Assessments: The CONSULTANT shall be responsible for, but not limited to, the following activities: Determine landward extent of wetlands and other surface waters as detailed in Rule Chapter 62-340, F.A.C., as ratified in Section 373.4211, F.S..; United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Wetland Delineation Manual (Technical Report Y-87-1); Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region (ERD/EL TR-10-20). Collect all data and information necessary to determine the jurisdictional boundaries of wetlands and other surface waters as defined by the rules or regulations of each permitting agency processing a COUNTY permit application for the project. Set seasonal high-water levels in adjacent wetlands with biological indicators Obtain a jurisdictional determination as defined by the rules or regulations of each permitting agency processing a COUNTY permit application for the project. Prepare aerial maps showing the jurisdictional boundaries of wetlands and other surface waters. Aerial maps shall be reproducible, of a scale of 1" = 400'or more detailed and be recent photography. The maps shall show the jurisdictional boundaries of each agency. Photocopies of aerials are not acceptable. When necessary, a wetland specific survey will be prepared by a registered surveyor and mapper. All surveyed jurisdictional boundaries are to be tied to the project's baseline of survey. Prepare a written assessment of the current condition and functional value of the wetlands and other surface waters. Prepare data in tabular form which includes the ID number for each wetland (and other surface water, if necessary) impacted, size of wetland to be impacted, type of impact, and identify any wetland (by ID number and size) within the project limits that will not be impacted by the project. Prepare appropriate agency forms to obtain required permits. Forms may include but are not limited to the USACE "Wetland Determination Data Form — Atlantic and Gulf Coastal Plain Region"; the USACE "Approved Jurisdictional Determination Form"; Uniform Mitigation Assessment Method forms and/or project specific data forms. 8.2.3 Species Surveys: The CONSULTANT shall conduct wildlife surveys as defined by rules or regulations of any permitting agency or commenting agency that is processing a COUNTY permit. 8.3 Agency Verification of Wetland Data The CONSULTANT shall be responsible for verification of wetland and other surface water data identified in Section 8.2 and coordinating regulatory agency field reviews, including finalization of assessments and jurisdictional determinations with applicable agencies. 8.4 Complete and Submit All Required Permit Applications The CONSULTANT shall collect all the data and information necessary to prepare the permit applications and obtain the environmental permits required to construct the project as identified in the Project Description and as described in 8.4.1, 8.4.2, and 8.12 (Other Permits). The CONSULTANT shall prepare each permit application in accordance with the rules and/or regulations of the regulatory agency responsible for issuing a specific permit and/or authorization to perform work. The permit application packages must be approved by the COUNTY prior to submittal to regulatory agencies. The CONSULTANT will submit all permit applications, as directed by the COUNTY. The COUNTY will be responsible for payment of all permit fees. 8.4.1 Complete and Submit all Required Wetland Permit Applications: The CONSULTANT shall prepare, complete, and submit required wetland permit (i.e. ERP, Section 404) application packages to the appropriate regulatory agencies. This includes, but is not limited to, applications submitted to WMDs and/or DER The application package may include but is not limited to attachments (i.e. project location map, aerials, affidavit of ownership, pictures, additional technical analysis, etc.), a cover letter with project description as well as completion of applicable agency forms. The CONSULTANT shall prepare and respond to agency Requests for Additional Information (RAIs), including necessary revisions to the application package. All responses and completed application packages must be approved by the COUNTY prior to submittal to the regulatory agencies. Geotechnical permitting should also be prepared, submitted, and obtained. 8.4.2 Complete and Submit all Required Species Permit Applications: The CONSULTANT shall prepare, complete and submit required species permit applications to the appropriate agencies. This includes federal and state protected species permit application packages as required. The work includes completion of application package (i.e. project location map, aerials, affidavit of ownership, pictures, additional technical analysis, etc.), and cover letter with project description as well as completion of applicable forms. The CONSULTANT shall respond to agency RAIs, including necessary revisions to the application package. All responses and completed applications must be approved by the COUNTY prior to submittal to the regulatory agency. 8.5 Coordinate and Review Dredge and Fill Sketches The CONSULTANT shall review Dredge and Fill Detail sheets to ensure information on the sketch(es) meet the requirements of the regulatory agencies and are appropriate for environmental permit application submittal and acquisition. The CONSULTANT will also provide environmental data/information as needed to support the preparation of the Dredge and Fill sketches. 8.6 Prepare USCG Permit Application — N/A 8.7 Prepare Water Management District or Local Water Control District Right of Way Occupancy Permit Application The CONSULTANT shall be responsible for the preparation of the ROW Occupancy permit application in accordance with the regulatory agency requirements. The CONSULTANT shall be responsible for acquiring the ROW Occupancy permit. 8.8 Prepare Coastal Construction Control Line (CCCL) Permit Application — N/A 8.9 Prepare USACE Section 408 Application to Alter a Civil Works Project — N/A 8.10 Compensatory Mitigation Plan If impacts cannot be avoided, the CONSULTANT shall prepare a mitigation plan to be included as a part of the Environmental Resource Permit and or Section 404 permit applications. Prior to the development of mitigation alternatives, the CONSULTANT shall meet with the COUNTY Project Manager to determine the COUNTY's policies in proposing mitigation. The CONSULTANT shall develop a mitigation plan based upon the general guidelines provided by the COUNTY. The CONSULTANT will be directed by the COUNTY to investigate the mitigation options that meet federal and state requirements in accordance with section 373.4137, F.S. Below are mitigation options: Purchase of mitigation credits from a mitigation bank Payment to DEP/WMD for mitigation services Monetary participation in offsite regional mitigation plans Creation/restoration of wetlands on public lands or on right of way purchased by the COUNTY or on existing COUNTY right of way. In the event that physical creation or restoration is the only feasible alternative to offset wetland impacts, the CONSULTANT shall collect all the data and information necessary to prepare mitigation plans acceptable to all permitting agencies and commenting agencies who are processing or reviewing a permit application for a COUNTY project. Prior to selection of a final creation/restoration mitigation site, the CONSULTANT will provide the following services in the development of a mitigation plan: Preliminary jurisdictional determination for each proposed site Selection of alternative sites Coordination of alternative sites with the COUNTY/all environmental agencies Written narrative listing potential sites with justifications for both recommended and non -recommended sites. 8.11Mitigation Coordination and Meetings The CONSULTANT shall coordinate with COUNTY personnel prior to approaching any environmental permitting or commenting agencies. Once a mitigation plan has been reviewed and approved by the COUNTY, the CONSULTANT will be responsible for coordinating the proposed mitigation plan with the environmental agencies. The CONSULTANT will provide mitigation information needed to update the COUNTY Project Manager. 8.12Other Environmental Permits Environmental Clearances, and Technical Support scope items are considered Additional/Optional Service if requested by the COUNTY. Fees for these items are not included in the negotiated contract fees. If these items are determined necessary and are requested by the COUNTY, scope and fee will be negotiated at that time and will be implemented via Change Order. When applicable, the staff hourly rates established in the contract shall be utilized for fee determination. 8.13 Technical Support to the COUNTY for Environmental Clearances and Re-evaluations, (Optional Services) The CONSULTANT shall provide engineering and environmental support for the COUNTY to obtain environmental clearances for all changes to the project after the PD&E study was approved. These changes include but are not limited to pond and/or mitigation sites identified, land use or environmental changes, and major design changes. 8.13.1 NEPA or SEIR Re-evaluation Before the development of the final design plans, the CONSULTANT shall be responsible for coordinating with the FDOT to provide necessary engineering information required in the preparation of the re-evaluation by the COUNTY. The preparation of environmental re-evaluations includes those as listed in Part 1, Chapter 13 of the FDOT PD&E Manual: Right of Way, Design Change, and Construction Advertisement. Re-evaluations will be completed in accordance with Part 1, Chapter 13 of the PD&E Manual. The CONSULTANT shall provide information to update the Project Commitment Record for incorporation into the re-evaluation. It is the responsibility of the CONSULTANT to provide the engineering information on major design changes including changes in typical section, roadway alignment, pond site selection, right of way requirements, drainage, and traffic volumes that may affect noise models. 8.13.2 Archaeological and Historical Resources The CONSULTANT shall provide necessary technical information to analyze the impacts to all cultural and historical resources due to changes in the project in accordance with Part 2, Chapter 8 of the PD&E Manual. 8.13.3 Wetland Impact Analysis The CONSULTANT shall provide necessary technical information to analyze the impacts to wetlands and other surface waters in accordance with Part 2, Chapter 9 of the PD&E Manual due to changes in the project. 8.13.4 Essential Fish Habitat Impact Analysis The CONSULTANT shall provide necessary technical information to analyze the impacts to essential fish habitat in accordance Part 2, Chapter 17 of the PD&E Manual due to changes in the project. 8.13.5 Protected Species and Habitat Impact Analysis The CONSULTANT shall provide necessary technical information to analyze the impacts to all protected species and habitat in accordance with Part 2, Chapter 16 of the PD&E Manual due to changes in the project. The CONSULTANT shall perform the necessary analysis to complete agency consultation in accordance with Section 7 or Section 10 of the Endangered Species Act. 8.141'reparation of Environmental Clearances and Re-evaluations, (Optional Services) The CONSULTANT shall prepare reports and clearances for all the changes to the project that occurred after the PD&E study was approved. These changes could include but are not limited to pond and/or mitigation sites identified, land use or environmental changes, and major design changes. 8.14.1 NEPA or SEIR Re-evaluation During the development of the final design plans, the CONSULTANT shall be responsible for collecting the data and preparing a re- evaluation in accordance with Part 1, Chapter 13 of the PD&E Manual. 8.14.2 Archaeological and Historical Resources The CONSULTANT shall collect data necessary to completely analyze the impacts, due to changes in the project or project area, to all cultural and historic resources, and prepare a Cultural Resource Assessment Survey Report, in accordance with Part 2, Chapter 8 of the PD&E Manual. 8.14.3 Wetland Impact Analysis The CONSULTANT shall analyze the impacts to wetlands due to changes to the project and complete the wetlands section of a Natural Resources Evaluation Report, in accordance with Part 2, Chapter 9 of the PD&E Manual. 8.14.4 Essential Fish Habitat Impact Analysis The CONSULTANT shall analyze the impacts to essential fish habitat due to changes to the project and complete the Essential Fish Habitat section of a Natural Resources Evaluation Report, in accordance with Part 2, Chapter 17 of the PD&E Manual. 8.14.5 Protected Species and Habitat Impact Analysis The CONSULTANT shall collect data necessary to prepare the protected species and habitat section of the Natural Resources Evaluation Report and analyze the impacts to protected species and habitat by the changes to the project, in accordance with Part 2, Chapter 16 of the PD&E Manual. The CONSULTANT shall perform the necessary analysis to complete agency consultation in accordance with Section 7 or Section 10 of the Endangered Species Act. 8.15Contamination Impact Analysis, (Optional Services) The CONSULTANT shall prepare Contamination Screening Evaluation for the project limits including stormwater ponds and floodplain compensation sites as described in Part 2, Chapter 20, of the PD&E Manual. The appropriate level of analysis and deliverable type will be approved by the COUNTY's Project Manager and District Contamination Impact Coordinator. The draft Level 1 Contamination Screening Evaluation document shall be submitted to the COUNTY's Project Manager for review and final approval. The CONSULTANT shall include an evaluation of any new contamination impacts due to changes to the project from the PD&E design concept, if applicable, and any new discharges or new potential contamination impacts not evaluated in any previously completed Contamination Screening Evaluation. The project impacts, conclusions and recommendations, figures, tables and appendices will be provided in a Level I Contamination Screening Evaluation Report. The CONSULTANT shall provide Level II assessment services. If contamination is identified within the limits of construction, the CONSULTANT shall coordinate with the COUNTY Project Manager to properly mark identified contamination areas in the plans and develop specifications as appropriate. 8.16 Asbestos Survey - N/A 8.17Technical Meetings 8.18Quality Assurance/Quality Control 8.19Supervision 8.20Coordination 9 PD&E REEVALUATIONS AND TECHNICAL SUPPORT, (OPTIONAL SERVICES) The December 2020 Project Development and Environmental Study was completed under the assumption that only the parcel south of the existing Collier County Fire Station was available for a potential pond site. We anticipate there will be other more cost beneficial alternative pond site locations available to the COUNTY due to an amendment to an existing Developer Contribution Agreement (DCA). Also, a new traffic signal is planned for the intersection of Randall Boulevard and 8th Street NE, which was not included in the PD&E. Changes to access locations may also be triggered by the DCA amendment or new PUD within the project limits. We understand changes in design to the proposed project will require a Design Change Reevaluation to be completed by the CONSULTANT. 9.1 PD&E Reevaluation Document The CONSULTANT shall be responsible for coordinating all necessary engineering information required in the preparation of the PD&E Design Change Reevaluation. The Design Change Reevaluation will be completed by the CONSULTANT in accordance with the Project Development and Environment Manual. This Reevaluation will require detailed review of the proposed design changes and associated impacts; and document any changes to the original PD&E Study and original study limits. The PD&E Reevaluation document will have supporting attachments and/or technical memorandums as required by the PD&E Manual. The reevaluation will include the PD&E commitments and status in the document. The reevaluation process includes updates to the environmental components listed below in section 9 and in other sections of this scope of services. The CONSULTANT shall coordinate with the COUNTY and FDOT during the reevaluation process. The FDOT will coordinate with the FHWA. It is the responsibility of the CONSULTANT to provide the FDOT with engineering information on major design changes including changes in typical section, roadway alignment, pond site selection, right of way requirements, drainage, and traffic volumes that may affect traffic noise analysis and modeling. The CONSULTANT shall prepare clearances for all pond sites identified after the PD&E was completed. CONSULTANT shall perform the services outlined in this scope necessary to assess the environmental consequences or impacts of the stormwater pond site alternatives including easements, or floodplain compensation areas and any associated impacts that are being considered to satisfy the project's needs. This effort consists of collecting essential data, analyzing and comparing viable alternatives, and documenting the environmental impacts and recommendations. The CONSULTANT shall coordinate and perform the appropriate level of environmental analysis for this project as outlined in the Project, Development & Environment Manual with the modifications and clarifications identified in this Scope. The CONSULTANT shall determine the potential for environmental consequences or impacts as a part of the Stormwater Pond Siting Report (PSR). The focus of this assessment shall be to develop alternatives that avoid or minimize environmental impacts. 9.2 Cultural Resource Assessment Archaeological and Historical Features: The CONSULTANT shall collect data necessary to completely analyze the impacts to all cultural and historic resources by the pond sites and prepare a Cultural Resource Assessment related to the Design Change Reevaluation. The CONSULTANT shall perform a Cultural Resource Assessment Survey. The CONSULTANT shall collect data necessary to completely analyze the impacts to all cultural resources by all viable stormwater pond site alternatives including easements, or floodplain compensation areas. The CONSULTANT shall determine the potential for involvement with archaeological and historical features as a part of the Stormwater Pond Siting Report. This information will be used in developing the project's preferred Pond Site design. The focus of this assessment shall be to develop alternatives which avoid or minimize cultural resources involvement. The CONSULTANT shall prepare a Cultural Resource Assessment Survey as described in Part 2, Chapter 8, of the PD&E Manual and as outlined below: • Purpose and Objectives: In order to comply with the provisions of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 (Public law 89-665, as amended) and the implementing regulations (36 CFR 800) as well as with the provisions contained in Chapter 267, F.S., the CONSULTANT will conduct cultural resource surveys of all viable stormwater pond site alternatives including easements, mitigation or floodplain compensation areas and other associated impacts. The purpose of such surveys is to locate, identify, and bound any cultural resources, prehistoric or historic, associated with these projects and to assess the significance of these resources in terms of eligibility for listing on the National Register of (NRI-IP) according to criteria set forth in 36 CFR Section 60.4. The COUNTY will review all work associated with the development and preparation of the cultural resource assessment survey. The CONSULTANT will also coordinate those projects with the FHWA and the Florida Department of State, Division of Historical Resources. Cultural Resource Assessment Survey Services to be Performed: This assessment will comply with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) of 1966 (Public Law 89-655, as amended), as implemented by 36 CFR 800 (Protection of Historic Properties); Chapter 267, F.S.; and Part 2, Chapter 8 (Archaeological and Historic Resources) of the FDOT Project Development and Environment Manual. The scope of work and report will meet the requirements of Chapter 1A-46 (Archaeological and Historical Report Standards and Guidelines), Florida Administrative Code as well as the standards embodied in the Florida Division of Historic Resources' (FDHR) Historic Preservation Compliance Review Program and Cultural Resource Management Standards and Operational Manual: Module 3 (2003). The work elements to be accomplished are as follows: Prepare a Research Design for the Project: The research design should reflect the guidelines set forth in 36 CFR Part 66, the FDOT Cultural Resource Management Handbook and the Florida Division of Historical Resources' Cultural Resource Standards and Operational Manual: Module 3 (2003). The research design will be submitted to the COUNTY for approval prior to the initiation of fieldwork. A meeting attended by all pertinent parties may be required to discuss the submitted research design and its implications for the project (for example, man-hours, project budget, survey quality). Conduct a Field Survey of the Project Area: A cultural resource field assessment survey of the project area will be conducted. The survey will employ both surface and subsurface testing techniques to locate, identify, and evaluate the significance of cultural resources occurring in the project area. The intensity of field testing will be keyed to ranked probability zones (high, medium, low) of possible cultural resource occurrences based on paleo-environmental data, the occurrence of known sites, historic development and land use patterns, and other pertinent information. Subsurface testing in these ranked zones will adhere to standards set forth in the guidelines established in the FDOT Cultural Resource Management Handbook and the Florida Division of Historical Resources' Cultural Resource Management Standards and Operational Manual (2003).Testing in areas of high site probability should proceed at approximately 25 meter intervals and in areas of moderate site potential at approximately 50 meter intervals. Testing in low probability areas should generally proceed on a judgment's basis with at least ten percent of such areas subjected to testing. Judgmental testing should also be employed in areas of high and moderate site potential as appropriate. When cultural resources are located, additional testing should be conducted at intervals necessary to adequately define the resource. Subsurface tests will be 0.5 meters in diameter and dug to a minimum, subsurface conditions permitting, of one meter. All spoil from excavated tests should be sifted through 1/4-inch metal hardware cloth. Any cultural materials recovered from either surface or subsurface testing will be stored in plastic bags and properly labeled as to provenance. In the event that historic structures are encountered on a survey, each site will be properly mapped and photographed, the estimated date of construction and architectural style determined, and its architectural -historical significance evaluated. In addition, archaeological subsurface testing will be conducted in an attempt to detect any subsurface artifacts or features associated with the historical structure (for example, privies, wells, outbuildings). When appropriate, informant interviews should be conducted concerning any potential cultural resources identified. In addition, any necessary primary and secondary source research will be conducted in order to supplement the information obtained during the field survey. This background research shall include local information, materials kept by the Department of State in Tallahassee and elsewhere, and any other regional, state, or Federal repositories. Field notes -documenting the progress of the assessment survey should be maintained. These notes should include the type and number of tests conducted a brief description of artifacts or features encountered in testing, soils information, and other information pertinent to the assessment survey. All subsurface tests and areas of surface examination should be clearly marked on aerial photographs of the project area provided by the CONSULTANT. Documentation: A Florida Master Site File form will be completed on every prehistoric or historic cultural resource identified in the assessment survey. A National Register of Historic Places. Determination of Eligibility (DOE) package will be completed on each prehistoric and historic cultural resource according to criteria established by law (see Federal Register, CFR No. 18, Vol. 39, Part Ill, pp. 3369-3370). In the case of historic resources, specifically historic structures and related features, the DOE package will include a NRHP Registration Form with accompanying documentation. Maps, drawings, and photographs should be used, as appropriate, in the documentation of the cultural resources addressed in the assessment process. Process, Analyze, and Catalogue Recovered Cultural Materials: Laboratory processing will consist of artifact cleaning, stabilization (if required), packaging, and storage. Laboratory analysis will consist of the morphological and functional (if possible) classification of artifacts and, if diagnostic, the establishment of their cultural/ temporal affiliations. Proper and detailed documentation of artifact provenance, number, type, and description will be maintained. Artifacts will eventually be transferred to the FDOT by the CONSULTANT pending a decision on their final disposition. Prepare Report Documenting the Results of the Cultural Resource Assessment: A draft report presenting the methods, findings, evaluations, and recommendations of the cultural resource assessment of the intersection improvements will be prepared and submitted to the FDOT for review and comments. The report will be so prepared to conform to the standards set forth in FDOT Project- Development and Environment Manual (Part 2, Chapter 12 revised) as well as Chapter 1A-46 (Archaeological and Historical Report Standards and Guidelines), Florida Administrative Code; the Florida Division of Historic Resources' (FDHR) Cultural Resource Management Standards and Operational Manual: Module 3 (2003); and the FDOT Cultural Resource Management Handbook. In addition to the final report on the project, the CONSULTANT will provide periodic status reports to the COUNTY and FDOT documenting the progress of the cultural resource assessment. These reports will include information on survey findings, scheduling, potential problems, and other information deemed pertinent. Personnel Standards: Personnel will be considered qualified when they meet the minimum criteria for archaeologists, historians, architectural historians and other professionals as set forth in the Secretary of the Interior's Standards and Guidelines for Archeology and Historic Preservation and 36 CFR Part 61. Resumes of the Principal Investigator, other supervisory personnel, and CONSULTANT'S documenting their qualifications to conduct work in their stated area of expertise must accompany the contract proposal. Finally, all the qualified personnel assigned to a project should perform project activities directly related to their specific area of expertise. Institution or Corporate Standards: Any institution, corporation, or organization sponsoring the qualified professionals performing the work elements of the project must: • Provide or demonstrate access to adequate field and laboratory equipment necessary to complete the work required for the project. • Provide or demonstrate adequate facilities necessary for the proper treatment, analysis, and storage of specimens recovered from the project. Project Scheduling: COUNTY scheduling requirements require that the assessment be completed in a timely and efficient manner so it will not affect the overall project schedule. The time required to complete an individual project will be projected in the technical proposal. Meetings: Following the issuance of the Notice to Proceed, the CONSULTANT will agree to meet with the personnel of the FDOT, District 1 Environmental Office on an "as needed" basis to insure the successful completion of work on the project. 9.3 Wetland Evaluation Wetland Impact Analysis: The CONSULTANT shall analyze the impacts to wetlands for the pond sites and complete the Wetlands Evaluation Report. The CONSULTANT shall collect data necessary to completely assess the impacts on wetlands by all viable stormwater pond site alternatives including easements or floodplain compensation areas, and other associated impacts. The focus of this assessment shall be to develop alternatives that avoid or minimize wetland involvement. This information will be used in developing the project's preferred Pond Site design. The CONSULTANT shall collect data necessary to evaluate and identify wetlands within all viable stormwater pond site alternatives including easements, mitigation or floodplain compensation areas and associated impacts as described in Part 2, Chapter 9 of the PD&E Manual with the following modifications and clarifications: The CONSULTANT shall determine the potential for wetland involvement as a part of the Stormwater Pond Siting Report (PSR) and PD&E Reevaluation. Wetland boundaries within the immediate vicinity of all viable stormwater pond site alternatives including easements or floodplain compensation areas and other associated impacts shall be field delineated and plotted on aerial photography to a scale of at least 1:2500 (1" = 200') in accordance with current regulations of the Army Corps of Engineers and pertinent water management FDOT. A general assessment of these wetland areas shall be made by the CONSULTANT, including the size, type and function of each area. A detailed assessment and/or WRAP analysis shall only be required under extenuating circumstances when avoidance alternatives cannot be achieved. All maps shall be in a format that allows each sheet to be bound into the overall report. Wetland avoidance alternatives shall be a primary objective in Pond Site design. Secondary impacts such as water table alterations, construction impacts, or discharge into Class I, II or Outstanding Florida Waters must also be considered. The CONSULTANT shall perform the necessary coordination with the regulatory agencies in addressing wetlands involvement, impact assessment and required mitigation options. Specialized construction methods and other minimization techniques may be effective avoidance options in Pond Site design to avoid or minimize wetlands. 9.4 Wildlife and Habitat Wildlife and Habitat Impact Analysis: The CONSULTANT shall collect data necessary to perform an Endangered Species Biological Assessment and analyze the impacts to wildlife and habitat by the pond and/or mitigation sites. The CONSULTANT shall prepare a Biological Assessment. These services do not include a Phase II Environmental Survey or Specific T&E Species. If required, a Specific Species Survey will be performed and will be considered Additional Services. The CONSULTANT shall collect data necessary to completely analyze the impacts on all protected floral and faunal species by all viable stormwater pond site alternatives including easements, mitigation or floodplain compensation areas and other associated impacts. The focus of this assessment shall be to develop alternatives that avoid listed species involvement. This information will be used in developing the project's Pond Site Report and final design. The CONSULTANT shall collect data necessary to completely analyze the impacts of all protected floral and fauna! species by all viable stormwater pond site alternatives including easements or floodplain compensation areas, and other associated impacts as described in Part 2, Chapter 16 of the PD&E Manual with the following modifications and clarifications: The CONSULTANT shall determine the potential for involvement with protected floral and fauna! species as a part of the Stormwater Pond Siting Report. Protected species include those listed as endangered, threatened, under review or of special concern by the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FFWCC), and/or the US Department of Agriculture (USDA). Protected species considered will be based on the USFWS and FFWCC's internet information, literature accounts, personal contacts, those observed or expected to occur based on contacts with local FFWCC, USDA or USFWS staff, and the CONSULTANT'S professional experience. The CONSULTANT will also determine the presence or absence of designated "Critical Habitat" in the vicinity of all viable stormwater pond site alternatives including easements, mitigation or floodplain compensation areas and other associated impacts. The CONSULTANT will provide a FLUCFCS map, on aerial based format, showing proposed project and locations of any listed species. All maps shall be in a format that allows each sheet to be bound into the overall report. For those species which may occur in the vicinity of the project based on data sources or for suitable habitat found within all viable stormwater pond site alternatives including easements, mitigation or floodplain compensation areas and other associated impacts, the CONSULTANT shall conduct field studies to determine the presence or absence of protected species. Prior to field review and analysis, the CONSULTANT shall coordinate with USFWS, FFWCC and/or USDA to gain approval on a written survey methodology and habitat mapping techniques. The CONSULTANT shall be responsible for providing reasonable notice to property owners whose properties are to be surveyed. For species found or expected to occur, the CONSULTANT shall quantify, qualify and evaluate the potential impacts (including cumulative, secondary and/or indirect impacts) of the location of all viable stormwater pond site alternatives including easements or floodplain compensation areas and other associated impacts. This assessment shall include the study of avoidance and minimization of harm alternatives as the primary objective as much as feasibly and reasonably possible. Secondary impacts such as water table alterations, proximity, foraging habitat impacts, construction impacts, etc. and the effect of the impacts on viability of the regional (local) population of the species shall be considered and evaluated. The CONSULTANT shall anticipate necessary coordination with regulatory agencies in addressing species involvement, impact assessment, pond siting specifics, and required mitigation options. Pond site configuration or other minimization techniques may be effective avoidance options to avoid protected species permitting and mitigation processes. All project involvement with listed species, flora and fauna, shall be photo documented, where possible. The CONSULTANT shall be responsible for coordinating with the appropriate USFWS, FFWCC, USDA and/or FDOT Environmental Office staff in developing acceptable mitigation plans for unavoidable impacts to protected species. As part of the CONSULTANT'S responsibility to provide sufficient information necessary to acquire any permits, an evaluation of the entire project area for impacts to wildlife in accordance with the Endangered Species Act, State Statutes, and all rules and regulations of each regulatory agency with jurisdiction on the project shall be performed by the CONSULTANT. This evaluation (i.e. wildlife surveys, permit packages/applications, photographic documentation, etc...) shall be of sufficient detail and properly documented so as to satisfy any permit acquisition and/or mitigation requirements (i.e. USACOE, USFWS, ERP, and Gopher Tortoise Permit, etc...). The CONSULTANT shall anticipate completing a formal Section 7 consultation with the USFWS as appropriate. The CONSULTANT shall be responsible for any coordination with the COUNTY and/or regulatory agencies required to perform the evaluation, permitting, and/or mitigation. The CONSULTANT shall also review the commitments in the PD&E Document relating to wildlife and/or listed species and perform any necessary work to fulfill these commitments not specifically addressed above. Report Preparation: The CONSULTANT shall review all Technical Memorandums that were prepared under previous sections of this scope and summarize them in the Pond Siting Report and PD&E Reevaluation where appropriate. The summaries shall document the potential for environmental consequences or impacts. The CONSULTANT shall also provide detailed, bound Technical Memorandums to the COUNTY for each of the tasks outlined in this scope. Coordination Meeting: Prior to proceeding with the pond site design, the CONSULTANT shall meet with the appropriate COUNTY staff. The purpose of this is to provide- information to the CONSULTANT that will better coordinate future work efforts. This meeting is MANDATORY and is to occur within 30 days after the Notice to Proceed is given to the CONSULTANT. In addition, the CONSULTANT shall schedule a minimum of four (4) meetings with appropriate COUNTY Environmental staff. The purpose of these meetings is to provide information to the COUNTY that will better coordinate environmental assessment efforts. It is the responsibility of the CONSULTANT to undertake the necessary action (i.e. phone calls, meetings, correspondence, etc.) to ensure that THE COUNTY Environmental staff is kept informed of the project efforts so that these tasks are accomplished in a manner that will enhance the overall success of the project. 9.5 Contamination, (Optional Services) Contamination Impact Analysis: The CONSULTANT shall perform the necessary analysis to complete the Contamination Screening Evaluation for the alternate pond sites and complete the Contamination Screening Evaluation Report. The CONSULTANT shall take color photographs of the pond sites, as well as any suspected contamination areas, and reproduce them in color in the CSER. For the preferred pond sites, the CONSULTANT shall perform a Contamination Impact (Level 2) Assessment, unless the site(s) has already had a Level 2 Assessment during the PD&E. The details of subsurface investigations, including the number and placement of proposed soil borings, the details of monitoring well investigations, types of testing and techniques to be used, shall be discussed with, and approved by, the FDOT Contamination Impact Coordinator (OCIC) in a face-to-face meeting prior to commencement of these activities. The CONSULTANT shall conduct a diligent search for monitoring wells, both along the mainline and in the pond and mitigation areas and ensure that they are marked on the plans and identified as monitoring wells. If potential contamination sites are identified within the project limits the COUNTY or its designee will provide the CONSULTANT with potential contamination areas to be marked on the plans. The CONSULTANT shall transfer these markings, in the form of hatching, onto copies of the corresponding individual plan sheets (not on project overview sheets). Along with the hatching the CONSULTANT shall print the site identification (name), and a legend clearly indicating what the hatching represents. These plan sheets shall be incorporated into the body of the plans with their own individual sheet numbers (separate from the numbered sheets from which they were copied), and they shall be identified on the key sheet just like any other section. The title of this section can be either Potential Contamination Sheets or Potential Contamination Areas or Potential Contamination Sites. At the beginning of this section the CONSULTANT shall include a General Note Concerning Contamination, which will be provided by the COUNTY or its designee. 9.6 Technical Meetings Includes meetings with the COUNTY, FDOT, and other Agency staff, between disciplines and CONSULTANT, such as progress review meetings (phase review), and miscellaneous meetings necessary for all elements of the PD&E Reevaluation. 9.7 Quality Assurance/Quality Control The CONSULTANT shall be responsible for the professional quality, technical accuracy and coordination of all surveys, designs, drawings, specifications and other services furnished by the CONSULTANT under this contract. 9.8 Supervision Includes all efforts required to supervise all technical design activities. 9.9 Coordination Includes efforts to coordinate all elements of the PD&E Reevaluation of the project to produce a final set of construction documents. 9.10Independent Peer Review CONSULTANT will conduct an independent peer review of the PD&E Reevaluation document prior to submitting for FHWA approval. 10 STRUCTURES - SUMMARY AND MISCELLANEOUS TASKS AND DRAWINGS The CONSULTANT shall analyze, design, and develop contract documents for all structures in accordance with applicable provisions as defined in Section 2.21 Provisions for Work. Individual tasks identified in Sections 9 through 18 are defined in the Staff Hour Estimation Handbook and within the provision defined in Section 2. 21 Provisions for Work. Contract documents shall display economical solutions for the given conditions. The CONSULTANT shall provide Design Documentation to the COUNTY with each submittal consisting of structural design calculations and other supporting documentation developed during the development of the plans. The design calculations submitted shall adequately address the complete design of all structural elements. These calculations shall be neatly and logically presented on digital media or, at the COUNTY's request, on 8 'h"xI 1" paper and all sheets shall be numbered. The final design calculations shall be signed and sealed by a Florida -licensed professional engineer. A cover sheet indexing the contents of the calculations shall be included and the engineer shall sign and seal that sheet. All computer programs and parameters used in the design calculations shall include sufficient backup information to facilitate the review task. 10.1 Key Sheet and Index of Drawings 10.2 Project Layout 10.3 General Notes and Bid Item Notes 10.4 Miscellaneous Common Details 10.5 Incorporate Report of Core Borings 10.6 Standard Plans- Bridges 10.7 Existing Bridge Plans — N/A 10.8 Assemble Plan Summary Boxes and Quantities 10.9 Cost Estimate 10.10 Technical Special Provisions and Modified Special Provisions 10.11 Field Reviews 10.12 Technical Meetings 10.13 Quality Assurance/Quality Control 10.14 Independent Peer Review 10.15 Supervision 10.16 Coordination 11 STRUCTURES - BRIDGE DEVELOPMENT REPORT The CONSULTANT shall prepare a Bridge Development Report (BDR). The BDR shall be submitted as part of the Phase I Roadway Submittal, General Requirements. The Preliminary Engineering Report (PER) included in the PD&E study provides conceptual layout of the future grade separated flyover bridge (which to be designed and constructed as part of Phase 2). The CONSULTANT shall develop this BDR to refine the flyover bridge concept and provide 30% plans for the flyover. The intent of developing 30% plans is to determine location of the piers and anticipated footprint of the foundations for the future flyover. The 30% plans will be subsequently used to determine extent of Right -of -Way acquisition and coordination of the utility work to avoid potential conflicts with future bridge foundation. Outline for elements of the future flyover shall be shown in the Phase 1 contract plans for Phase 1 design coordination with future work. General Requirements 11.1 Bridge Geometry 11.2 Ship Impact Data Collection - N/A 11.3 Ship Impact Criteria - N/A Superstructure Alternatives 11.4 Short -Span Concrete - N/A 11.5 Medium -Span Concrete - N/A 11.6 Long Span Concrete - N/A PD&E study indicates that use of long span concrete bridge may not be feasible due to the roadway curvature and spans lengths exceeding 150 feet. 11.7 Structural Steel Foundation and Substructure Alternatives 11.8 Pier/Bent 11.9 Shallow Foundations / GRS Abutments - N/A 11.10 Deep Foundations Movable Span - N/A 11.11 Data Collection and Design Criteria 11.12 Movable Span Geometrics and Clearances 11.13 Deck System Evaluation 11.14 Framing Plan Development 11.15 Main Girder Preliminary Design 11.16 Conceptual Span Balance/Counterweight 11.17 Support System Development 11.18 Drive Power Calculations 11.19 Drive System Development 11.20 Power and Control Development 11.21 Conceptual Pier Design 11.22 Foundation Analysis (FL PIER) 11.23 Tender Visibility Study Other BDR Issues 11.24 Aesthetics 11.25 TTCP/Staged Construction Requirements 11.26 Constructability Requirements 11.27 Load Rating for Damaged/Widened Structures - N/A 11.28 Quantity and Cost Estimates - N/A 11.29 Quantity and Cost Estimates - Movable Span - N/A 11.30 Wall Type Justification Report Preparation 11.31 Exhibits 11.32 Exhibits - Movable Span - N/A 11.33 Report Preparation 11.34 Report Preparation - Movable Span - N/A 11.35 BDR Submittal Package Preliminary Plans (To be included in the BDR) 1. General Notes Sheets 2. Plan and Elevation Sheets 3. Construction Staging 4. Superstructure Section Sheets 5. Substructure Section Sheets 6. Report of core borings 7. Preliminary foundation layouts 8. Wall Layout Sheets Preliminary Geotechnical investigations Report shall be included as part of the BDR preparation. 12 STRUCTURES - TEMPORARY BRIDGE — N/A 13 STRUCTURES - SHORT SPAN CONCRETE BRIDGE — N/A 14 STRUCTURES - MEDIUM SPAN CONCRETE BRIDGE — N/A 15 STRUCTURES - STRUCTURAL STEEL BRIDGE — N/A 16 STRUCTURES - SEGMENTAL CONCRETE BRIDGE — N/A 17 STRUCTURES - MOVABLE SPAN — N/A 18 STRUCTURES - RETAINING WALLS The CONSULTANT shall prepare plans for Retaining Wall(s) as specified in Section 2.5. General Requirements 18.1 Key Sheet 18.2 Horizontal Wall Geometry Permanent Proprietary Walls 18.3 Vertical Wall Geometry 18.4 Semi -Standard Drawings 18.5 Wall Plan and Elevations (Control Drawings) 18.6 Details Temporary Proprietary Walls 18.7 Vertical Wall Geometry 18.8 Semi -Standard Drawings 18.9 Wall Plan and Elevations (Control Drawings) 18.10 Details Cast -In -Place Retaining Walls 18.11 Design 18.12 Vertical Wall Geometry 18.13 General Notes 18.14 Wall Plan and Elevations (Control Drawings) 18.15 Sections and Details 18.16 Reinforcing Bar List Other Retaining Walls and Bulkheads 18.17 Design 18.18 Vertical Wall Geometry 18.19 General Notes, Tables and Miscellaneous Details 18.20 Wall Plan and Elevations 18.21 Details 19 STRUCTURES — MISCELLANEOUS The CONSULTANT shall prepare plans for Miscellaneous Structure(s) as specified in Section 2.5. Concrete Box Culverts 19.1 Concrete Box Culverts — N/A 19.2 Concrete Box Culverts Extensions Provide preliminary design for extension of Bridge Culvert 034063 (CR-846 over Corkscrew Canal). The preliminary design shall be adequately developed to facilitate future improvement for canal realignment (to be performed as part of Phase 2 work) and subsequently facilitate determination of the Right -of -Way acquisition to be performed as part of Phase 1. 19.3 Concrete Box Culvert Data Table Plan Sheets 19.4 Concrete Box Culvert Special Details Plan Sheets Strain Poles — N/A 19.5 Steel Strain Poles 19.6 Concrete Strain Poles 19.7 Strain Pole Data Table Plan Sheets 19.8 Strain Pole Special Details Plan Sheets Mast Arms 19.9 Mast Arms 19.10 Mast Arms Data Table Plan Sheets 19.11 Mast Arms Special Details Plan Sheets Overhead/Cantilever Sign Structure - N/A 19.12 Cantilever Sign Structures 19.13 Overhead Span Sign Structures 19.14 Special (Long Span) Overhead Sign Structures 19.15 Monotube Overhead Sign Structure 19.16 Bridge Mounted Signs (Attached to Superstructure) 19.17 Overhead/Cantilever Sign Structures Data Table Plan Sheets 19.18 Overhead/Cantilever Sign Structures Special Details Plan Sheets High Mast Lighting - N/A 19.18Non-Standard High Mast Lighting Structures 19.19High Mast Lighting Special Details Plan Sheets Noise Barrier Walls (Ground Mount) - As needed. 19.2011orizontal Wall Geometry 19.21Vertical Wall Geometry 19.22 Summary of Quantities - Aesthetic Requirements 19.23Control Drawings 19.24Design of Noise Barrier Walls Covered by Standards 19.25Design of Noise Barrier Walls not Covered by Standards 19.26Aesthetic Details Special Structures 19.27Fender System - N/A 19.28Fender System Access - N/A 19.29Special Structures - Spread Footer Lighting Foundations - as required 19.300ther Structures - N/A 19.31 Condition Evaluation of Signal and Sign Structures, and High Mast Light Poles - N/A 19.32Condition Evaluation of Signal and Sign Structures, and High Mast Light Poles (No As built or Design Plans Available) - N/A 19.33Analytical Evaluation of Signal and Sign Structures, and High Mast Light Poles - N/A 19.34Ancillary Structures Report - N/A 20 SIGNING AND PAVEMENT MARKING ANALYSIS The CONSULTANT shall analyze and document Signing and Pavement Markings Tasks in accordance with all applicable manuals, guidelines, standards, handbooks, procedures, and current design memorandums. 20.1 Traffic Data Analysis The CONSULTANT shall review the approved preliminary engineering report, typical section package, traffic technical memorandum and proposed geometric design alignment to identify proposed sign placements and roadway markings. Perform queue analysis. 20.2No Passing Zone Study - N/A 20.3Reference and Master Design File The CONSULTANT shall prepare the Signing & Marking Design file to include all necessary design elements and all associated reference files. 20AMulti-Post Sign Support Calculations The CONSULTANT shall determine the appropriate column size from the COUNTY's Multi -Post Sign Program(s). 20.5Sign Panel Design Analysis Establish sign layout, letter size and series for non-standard signs. 20.6Sign Lighting/Electrical Calculations - N/A 20.7Quantities 20.8Cost Estimate 20.9Technical Special Provisions and Modified Special Provisions 20.10 Other Signing and Pavement Marking Analysis 20.11 Field Reviews 20.12 Technical Meetings 20.13 Quality Assurance/Quality Control 20.14 Independent Peer Review 20.15 Supervision 20.16 Coordination 21 SIGNING AND PAVEMENT MARKING PLANS The CONSULTANT shall prepare a set of Signing and Pavement Marking Plans in accordance with all applicable manuals, guidelines, standards, handbooks, procedures, and current design memorandums that includes the following. 21.1 Key Sheet 21.2 Summary of Pay Items Including Quantity Input 21.3 Tabulation of Quantities 21.4 General Notes/Pay Item Notes 21.5 Project Layout 21.6 Plan Sheet 21.7 Typical Details 21.8 Guide Sign Work Sheet(s) 21.9 Traffic Monitoring Site — as required 21.10 Cross Sections 21.11 Special Service Point Details — as required 21.12 Special Details 21.13 Interim Standards 21.14 Quality Assurance/Quality Control The CONSULTANT shall be responsible for the professional quality, technical accuracy and coordination of traffic design drawings, specifications and other services furnished by the CONSULTANT under this contract. The CONSULTANT shall provide a Quality Control Plan that describes the procedures to be utilized to verify, independently check, and review all design drawings, specifications and other services prepared as a part of the contract. The CONSULTANT shall describe how the checking and review processes are to be documented to verify that the required procedures were followed. The Quality Control Plan may be one utilized by the CONSULTANT as part of their normal operation or it may be one specifically designed for this project. 21.15 Supervision 22 SIGNALIZATION ANALYSIS The CONSULTANT shall analyze and document Signalization Analysis Tasks in accordance with all applicable manuals, guidelines, standards, handbooks, procedures, and current design memorandums. 22.1 Traffic Data Collection — as required The CONSULTANT shall perform all effort required for traffic data collection, including crash reports, 24 hr. machine counts, 8 hr. turning movement counts, 7-day machine counts, and speed & delay studies. 22.2 Traffic Data Analysis The CONSULTANT shall determine signal operation plan, intersection geometry, local signal timings, pre-emption phasing & timings, forecasting traffic, and intersection analysis run. 22.3 Signal Warrant Study — N/A 22.4 Systems Timings The CONSULTANT shall assist the COUNTY staff with determining proper coordination timing plans including splits, force offs, offsets, and preparation of Time Space Diagram. Timings will be performed by the COUNTY. 22.5 Reference and Master Signalization Design File The CONSULTANT shall prepare the Signalization Design file to include all necessary design elements and all associated reference files. 22.6 Reference and Master Interconnect Communication Design File The CONSULTANT shall prepare the Interconnect Communication Design file to include all necessary design elements and all associated reference files. 22.7 Overhead Street Name Sign Design The CONSULTANT shall design Signal Mounted Overhead Illuminated Street Name signs. 22.8 Pole Elevation Analysis 22.9 Traffic Signal Operation Report — N/A 22.10 Quantities 22.11 Cost Estimate 22.12 Technical Special Provisions and Modified Special Provisions 22.13 The CONSULTANT shall meet the latest version of the Collier County Signalization Technical Special Provisions. 22.14 Other Signalization Analysis The CONSULTANT is required to incorporate into the project the following elements: Closed Circuit Television (CCTV) Cameras (as necessary) — the specification for these devices can be found on Collier County's website at http://www.collier og your-jzovemment/divisions-s-z/traffic-operations/traffic-technical-special-provisions Vehicle Detection (Inductive loops); web address for these specifications is above. Queue Analysis — Determine auxiliary lanes capacity Any additional Technical Special Provisions (must be approved by Traffic Operations Engineers) 22.15 Field Reviews The CONSULTANT shall collect information from the maintaining agencies and conduct a field review. The review should include, but is not limited to, the following: • Existing Signal and Pedestrian Phasing • Controller Make, Model, Capabilities and Condition/Age • Condition of Signal Structure(s) • Type of Detection as Compared with Current District Standards • Interconnect Media • Controller Timing Data 22.16 Technical Meetings 22.17 Quality Assurance/Quality Control The CONSULTANT shall be responsible for the professional quality, technical accuracy and coordination of traffic design drawings, specifications and other services furnished by the CONSULTANT under this contract. The CONSULTANT shall provide a Quality Control Plan that describes the procedures to be utilized to verify, independently check, and review all design drawings, specifications and other services prepared as a part of the contract. The CONSULTANT shall describe how the checking and review processes are to be documented to verify that the required procedures were followed. The Quality Control Plan may be one utilized by the CONSULTANT as part of their normal operation, or it may be one specifically designed for this project. 22.18 Independent Peer Review 22.19 Supervision 22.20 Coordination 23 SIGNALIZATION PLANS The CONSULTANT shall prepare a set of Signalization Plans in accordance with all applicable manuals, guidelines, standards, handbooks, procedures, and current design memorandums, which includes the following: • Immokalee Road -Randall Blvd. Intersection • Randall Blvd.- 8th Street NE Intersection 23.1 Key Sheet 23.2 Summary of Pay Items Including Designer Interface Quantity Input 23.3 Tabulation of Quantities 23.4 General Notes/Pay Item Notes 23.5 Plan Sheet 23.6 Interconnect Plans 23.7 Traffic Monitoring Site — as required 23.8 Guide Sign Worksheet 23.9 Special Details 23.10 Special Service Point Details — as required 23.11 Mast Arm/Monotube Tabulation Sheet 23.12 Strain Pole Schedule — N/A 23.13 TTCP Signal (Temporary) 23.14 Temporary Detection Sheet 23.15 Utility Conflict Sheet 23.16 Interim Standards 23.17 Quality Assurance/Quality Control The CONSULTANT shall be responsible for the professional quality, technical accuracy and coordination of traffic design drawings, specifications and other services furnished by the CONSULTANT under this contract. The CONSULTANT shall provide a Quality Control Plan that describes the procedures to be utilized to verify, independently check, and review all design drawings, specifications and other services prepared as a part of the contract. The CONSULTANT shall describe how the checking and review processes are to be documented to verify that the required procedures were followed. The Quality Control Plan may be one utilized by the CONSULTANT as part of their normal operation, or it may be one specifically designed for this project. 23.18 Supervision 24 LIGHTING ANALYSIS The CONSULTANT shall analyze and document Lighting Tasks in accordance with all applicable manuals, guidelines, standards, handbooks, procedures, and current design memorandums. 24.1 Lighting Justification Report The CONSULTANT shall prepare a Lighting Justification Report. The report shall be submitted under a separate cover with the 30% plans submittal, titled Lighting Justification Report. The report shall provide analyses for mainlines and arterial roads and shall include all back-up data such that the report stands on its own. Back up data shall include current ADT's, general crash data average cost from the Florida Highway Safety Improvement Manual, crash details data from the last three years, and preliminary lighting calculations. The report shall address warrants to determine if lighting warrants are met and shall include a benefit -cost analysis to determine if lighting is justified. The report shall include calculations for the night -to -day crash ratio as well as a table summarizing the daytime and the night-time crashes. The report shall follow the procedures outlined in the FDOT Manual on Uniform Traffic Studies (MUTS) manual which utilize ADT, Three Year Crash Data, night/day crash ratio, percentage of night ADT, etc. 24.2 Lighting Design Analysis Report The CONSULTANT shall prepare a Preliminary Lighting Design Analysis Report. The report shall be submitted under a separate cover with the 60% plans submittal. The report shall provide analyses for each signalized intersection lighting design and each typical section of the mainline and arterial roads. Each lighting calculation shall be properly identified as to the area that it covers. The report shall include the Lighting Design Criteria that will be used. For projects with corridor lighting, the report shall include the evaluation of at least three lighting design alternatives. The report shall provide a recommendation on the alternative to use. Each alternative shall be properly described; the alternatives shall consider different pole heights, lamp wattage, and arm lengths. Each alternative shall be provided with a cost estimate that includes initial cost in addition to operations and maintenance cost for one year. After approval of the preliminary report, the CONSULTANT shall submit a revised report for each submittal. The Lighting Design Analysis Report shall include: • Lighting Calculations • Structural calculations for special conventional pole concrete foundations if required • Letter to the power company requesting service • Power company confirmation letter on the requested services • Voltage drop calculations • Load analysis calculations for each branch circuit 24.3 Voltage Drop Calculations The CONSULTANT shall submit voltage drop calculations showing the equation or equations used along with the number of luminaries per circuit, the length of each circuit, the size conductor or conductors used, and their ohm resistance values. The voltage drop incurred on each circuit (total volts and percentage of drop) shall be calculated, and all work necessary to calculate the voltage drop values for each circuit should be presented in such a manner as to be duplicated by the COUNTY. The Voltage Drop Calculations shall be submitted as part of the Lighting Design Analysis Report. 24.4 FDEP Coordination and Report — N/A 24.5 Reference and Master Design Files The CONSULTANT shall prepare the Lighting Design file to include all necessary design elements and all associated reference files. 24.6 Temporary Lighting — N/A, by the CONTRACTOR, if required 24.7 Design Documentation - N/A; included in LDAR 24.8 Quantities 24.9 Cost Estimate 24.10 Technical Special Provisions and Modified Special Provisions 24.11 Other Lighting Analysis — N/A 24.12 Field Reviews The CONSULTANT shall collect information from the maintaining agencies and conduct a field review. The review should include but is not limited to the following: • Existing Lighting Equipment • Load Center, Capabilities and Condition/Age • Condition of Lighting Structure(s) • Verification of horizontal clearances • Verification of breakaway requirements 24.13 Technical Meetings 24.14 Quality Assurance/Quality Control 24.15 Independent Peer Review 24.16 Supervision 24.17 Coordination 25 LIGHTING PLANS The CONSULTANT shall prepare a set of Lighting Plans in accordance with all applicable manuals, guidelines, standards, handbooks, procedures, and current design memorandums. 25.1 Key Sheet 25.2 Summary of Pay Item Sheet 25.3 Tabulation of Quantities 25.4 General Notes/Pay Item Notes 25.5 Pole Data, Legend & Criteria 25.6 Service Point Details 25.7 Project Layout 25.8 Plan Sheet 25.9 Special Details 25.10 Temporary Lighting Data and Details —N/A 25.11 Temporary Traffic Control Plan Sheets — N/A 25.12 Interim Standards — N/A 25.13 Quality Assurance/Quality Control The CONSULTANT shall be responsible for the professional quality, technical accuracy and coordination of traffic design drawings, specifications and other services furnished by the CONSULTANT under this contract. The CONSULTANT shall provide a Quality Control Plan that describes the procedures to be utilized to verify, independently check, and review all design drawings, specifications and other services prepared as a part of the contract. The CONSULTANT shall describe how the checking and review processes are to be documented to verify that the required procedures were followed. The Quality Control Plan may be one utilized by the CONSULTANT as part of their normal operation, or it may be one specifically designed for this project. 25.14 Supervision 26 LANDSCAPE ANALYSIS The CONSULTANT shall analyze and document Landscape Architecture Tasks in accordance with all applicable manuals, guidelines, standards, handbooks, procedures, and current design memorandums. 26.1 Data Collection All research required to collect data necessary to complete the initial design analysis. Includes identifying local ordinances and collection of other project data as defined in the "Collier County Best Management Practices for Landscape Design and Permitting within the Right -of -Way" (as approved by the Board September 28, 2016). 26.2 Site Inventory and Analysis for Proposed Landscape Includes identification of opportunities and constraints for the proposed landscape project based on existing site conditions. Identify available planting areas for nursery landscape material. Provide a summary of analysis. 26.2a Selective Clearing and Grubbing Site Inventory 26.2b Inventory and Analysis 26.2c Vegetation Disposition Plan- Mainline 26.3 Planting Design — N/A a. Conceptual Planting Design — N/A b. Final Planting Design — N/A 26.4 Irrigation Design — NA/ a. Conceptual Irrigation Design N/A b. Final Irrigation Design — N/A 26.5 Hardscape Design Landscape/Irrigation Plans are not included in this Scope of Services. The CONSULTANT shall provide "base level of landscaping" in the roadway plans as follows: electrical and irrigation sleeving, clean median backfill with landscape quality soil, non -mountable Type F curbing and brick pavers at the median ends. Specification and references in "Landscape and Irrigation Specifications for Beautification Improvements" are found in the Collier County's Right of Way Manual. Plans will be reviewed by Collier County Landscape Design and Maintenance Staff. 26.6 Roll Plots Task includes any roll plots for the project to aid in developing plans (landscape opportunity, disposition, site inventory and analysis, etc.) 26.7 Cost Estimates 26.8 Technical Special Provisions and Modified Special Provisions 26.9 Inspection Services Services may include: on -site inspection, construction, observation, monitoring, supervision, and any reporting requirements. 26.10 Other Landscape Services — N/A 26.11 Outdoor Advertising — N/A 26.12 Field Reviews 26.13 Technical Meetings / Public Meetings - NA 26.14 Quality Assurance/Quality Control 26.15 Independent Peer Review - NA 26.16 Supervision 26.17 Project Coordination 26.18 Interdisciplinary Coordination 27 LANDSCAPE PLANS The CONSULTANT shall include landscape features as included in this scope of services on the roadway plan sheets and detail sheets 27.1 Key Sheet — N/A 27.2 Tabulation of Quantities and Plant Schedule — N/A 27.3 General Notes — N/A 27.4 Tree and Vegetation Protection and Relocation Plans and Tree Disposition Plans - N/A 27.5 Planting Plans for Linear Roadway Projects — N/A 27.6 Planting Plans (Interchanges and Toll Plazas) — N/A 27.7 Planting Details and Notes — N/A 27.8 Irrigation Plans for Linear Roadway Project — N/A 27.9 Irrigation Plans for Interchange and Toll Plazas — N/A 27.10 Irrigation Details and Notes — N/A 27.11 Hardscape Plans — N/A 27.12 Hardscape Details and Notes 27.13 Landscape Maintenance Plan — N/A 27.14 Quality Assurance/Quality Control 27.15 Supervision 28 SURVEY The CONSULTANT shall perform survey tasks in accordance with all applicable statutes, manuals, guidelines, standards, handbooks, procedures, and current design memoranda. The CONSULTANT shall submit all survey notes and computations to document the surveys. All field survey work shall be recorded in approved media and submitted to the COUNTY. Field books submitted to the COUNTY must be of an approved type. The field books shall be certified by the surveyor in responsible charge of work being performed before the final product is submitted. The survey notes shall include documentation of decisions reached from meetings, telephone conversations or site visits. All like work (such as bench lines, reference points, etc.) shall be recorded contiguously. The COUNTY may not accept field survey radial locations of section corners, platted subdivision lot and block corners, alignment control points, alignment control reference points and certified section corner references. The COUNTY may instead require that these points be surveyed by true line, traverse or parallel offset or Global Positioning Systems (GPS) procedures. 28.1 Horizontal Project Control (HPC) Establish or recover HPC, for the purpose of establishing horizontal control on the Florida State Plane Coordinate System or datum approved by the COUNTY Project Manager; may include primary or secondary control points. Includes analysis and processing of all field collected data, and preparation of forms. 28.2 Vertical Project Control (VPC) Establish or recover VPC, for the purpose of establishing vertical control on datum approved by the COUNTY Project Manager; may include primary or secondary vertical control points. Includes analysis and processing of all field collected data, and preparation of forms. 28.3 Alignment and/or Existing Right of Way (R/W) Lines Establish, recover or re-establish project alignment. Also includes analysis and processing of all field collected data, existing maps, and/or reports for identifying mainline, offset, or secondary alignments. Depict alignment and/or existing R/W lines (in required format) per COUNTY R/W Maps, platted or dedicated rights of way. 28.4 Aerial Targets Place, locate, and maintain required aerial targets and/or photo identifiable points. Includes analysis and processing of all field collected data, existing maps, and/or reports. Placement of the targets will be at the discretion of the aerial firm. 28.5 Reference Points Reference Horizontal Project Control (HPC) points, project alignment, vertical control points, section, '/a section, center of section corners and General Land Office (G.L.O.) corners as required. 28.6 Topography/Digital Terrain Model (DTM) (3D) Locate all above ground features and improvements for the limits of the project by collecting the required data for the purpose of creating a DTM with sufficient density. Shoot all break lines, high and low points. Effort includes field edits, analysis and processing of all field collected data, existing maps, and/or reports. 28.7 Planimetric (2D) Locate all above ground features and improvements. Deliver in appropriate electronic format. Effort includes field edits, analysis and processing of all field collected data, existing maps, and/or reports. 28.8 Roadway Cross Sections/Profiles Perform cross sections or profiles. May include analysis and processing of all field -collected data for comparison with DTM. 28.9 Side Street Surveys Refer to tasks of this document as applicable. 28.10 Underground Utilities Designation includes 2-dimensional collection of existing utilities and selected 3-dimensional verification as needed for designation. Location includes non-destructive excavation to determine size, type and location of existing utility, as necessary for final 3- dimensional verification. Survey includes collection of data on points as needed for designates and locates. Includes analysis and processing of all field collected data, and delivery of all appropriate electronic files. The CONSULTANT shall SUE all locations that include new underground infrastructure or earthwork excavation (i.e. drilled shafts, bridge piles, strain poles, mast arms, miscellaneous foundations, drainage structures, pipe culverts, new ditches, etc.). The expectation is for the CONSULTANT to know exactly where all existing underground utilities and infrastructure are located in areas that work will be performed to properly design for any new underground infrastructure or earthwork excavation that will be constructed on the project. The CONSULTANT's approach to practicing SUE shall be consistent with the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) Standard (Cl/ASCE 38-02) entitled "Standard Guideline for the Collection and Depiction of Existing Subsurface Utility Data" as follows: • Identify utility owners that have facilities on, or may be affected by, the project limits. Contact these utility owners (face to face meetings recommended) and provide them with information about the proposed project and schedule periodic follow-up meetings. (ASCE Quality Level D). • Review all information that can be obtained and plot on utility composite drawing (CADD file to be furnished). (ASCE Quality Level D). • Make field observations to identify visible above -ground utility features. Provide all information in field sketches so surveyor can prepare a complete survey and plot a rectilinear grid. (ASCE Quality Level C) • Use appropriate surface geophysical methods (i.e., pipe and cable locators, terrain conductivity methods, resistively measurements, metal detectors, Ground Penetrating Radar, etc.) to designate existing subsurface utilities or to trace a particular utility system. This provides two-dimensional horizontal information. Place paint marks on the ground. Place identification flags or stakes on the paint marks or coding on the pavement and survey to project controls. Depict resulting information via computer aided design and drafting (CADD). Provide notes and sketches to designer of record and/or on -site engineer. Non-tonable (non-metallic) utilities will be discussed at this time with the designer of record and/or on -site engineer. (ASCE Quality Level B). • Meet with designer of record and/or on -site engineer to determine utility conflicts and ASCE Quality Level A test hole locations. • Expose selected subsurface utilities to obtain three-dimensional information. Use minimally intrusive excavation methods, such as vacuum excavation and Air -Lance. Depict resulting information. Resolve differences between all information gathered. Provide test hole data sheets (THDS) to designer of record and/or on -site engineer. All test holes are to be back -filled as described below. (ASCE Quality Level A). On completion, test holes shall be restored to the following: a. Backfilled with in -kind material b. Placed backfill using proper techniques c. Restored pavement with in -kind material d. Restored areas outside of pavement to pre -excavation conditions • Collect and store utility location and condition information in a database for asset management. Provide a detailed report of utility locations, depths, size, type, etc. All information shall be provided in the format preapproved by the COUNTY. 28.11 Outfall Survey Locate all above ground features and improvements for the limits of the project by collecting the required data for the purpose of a DTM. Survey with sufficient density of shots. Shoot all break lines, high and low points. Includes field edits, analysis and processing of all field collected data, existing maps, and/or reports. 28.12 Drainage Survey Locate underground data (XYZ, pipe size, type, condition and flow line) that relates to above ground data. Includes field edits, analysis and processing of all field collected data, existing maps, and/or reports 28.13 Bridge Survey (Minor/Major) Design survey shall include existing Bridge Culvert 034063 (CR-846 / Corkscrew Canal). The scope of the survey shall be adequate to facilitate 30% design the culvert extension to be performed as part of Phase 2. 28.14 Channel Survey Provide survey along Cocahatchee Canal and Corkscrew Canal to support preliminary design for future Cocahatchee Canal realignment, future bridge culvert extensions, etc. (that are planned to be performed in Phase 2). Extent of the survey shall be determined based on Phase 2 conceptual design exhibits included in the PD&E Study. The channel survey shall be performed in conformance with South Florida Water Management District's (SFWMD) current requirements for Phase 2 improvements. 28.15 Pond Site Survey Refer to tasks of this document as applicable. 28.16 Mitigation Survey Refer to tasks of this document as applicable. 28.17 Jurisdiction Line Survey Perform field location (2-dimensional) of jurisdiction limits as defined by respective authorities, also includes field edits, analysis and processing of all field collected data, preparation of reports. 28.18 Geotechnical Support Perform 3-dimensional (X,Y,Z) field location, or stakeout, of boring sites established by geotechnical engineer. Includes field edits, analysis and processing of all field collected data and/or reports. 28.19 Sectional/Grant Survey Perform field location/placement of section corners, 1/4 section corners, and fractional corners where pertinent. Includes analysis and processing of all field -collected data and/or reports. 28.20 Subdivision Location — N/A 28.21 Maintained R/W Perform field location (2-dimensional) of maintained R/W limits as defined by respective authorities, if needed. Also includes field edits, analysis and processing of all field collected data, preparation of reports. 28.22 Boundary Survey Perform boundary survey as defined by FDOT and COUNTY standards. Includes analysis and processing of all field -collected data, preparation of reports. 28.23 Water Boundary Survey Perform Mean High Water, Ordinary High Water and Safe Upland Line surveys as required by FDOT and COUNTY standards. 28.24 Right of Way Staking, Parcel / Right of Way Line Perform field staking and calculations of existing/proposed R/W lines for on -site review purposes. 28.25 Right of Way Monumentation Set R/W monumentation as depicted on final R/W maps for corridor and water retention areas. 28.26 Line Cutting Perform all efforts required to clear vegetation from the line of sight. 28.27 Work Zone Safety Provide work zone as required by FDOT standards. 28.28 Vegetation Survey Locate vegetation within the project limits. 28.29 Tree Survey Locate individual trees or palms within the project limits. 28.30 Miscellaneous Surveys Refer to tasks of this document, as applicable, to perform surveys not described herein. The percent for Supplemental will be determined at negotiations. This item can only be used if authorized in writing by the COUNTY Project Manager. 28.31 Supplemental Surveys Supplemental survey days and hours are to be approved in advance by COUNTY Project Manager. Refer to tasks of this document, as applicable, to perform surveys not described herein. 28.32 Document Research Perform research of documentation to support field and office efforts involving surveying and mapping. 28.33 Field Review Perform verification of the field conditions as related to the collected survey data. 28.34 Technical Meetings Attend meetings as required and negotiated by the Surveying and Mapping COUNTY. 28.35 Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC) Establish and implement a QA/QC plan. Also includes subconsultant review, response to comments and any resolution meetings if required, preparation of submittals for review, etc. 28.36 Supervision Perform all activities required to supervise and coordinate project. These activities must be performed by the project supervisor, a Florida P.S.M. or their delegate as approved by the COUNTY Project Manager. 28.37 Coordination Coordinate survey activities with other disciplines. These activities must be performed by the project supervisor, a Florida P.S.M. or their delegate as approved by the COUNTY Project Manager. 29 PHOTOGRAMMETRY The CONSULTANT shall perform photogrammetric tasks in accordance with all applicable statues, manuals, guidelines, standards, handbooks, procedures, and current design memoranda. In addition to the maps and photographic products, the CONSULTANT shall submit all computations to document the mapping. This will include documentation of all decisions reached from meetings, telephone conversations, and site visits. 29.1Flight Preparation Review record data, create target diagrams, and plan the mission. 29.2Control Point Coordination Determine photo identifiable control points, and mark contact prints. 29.3Mobilization Perform pre- and post -flight aircraft inspection; prepare the aircraft and camera for the mission. 29AFlight Operations Operate the aircraft, aerial camera, and other instruments to obtain aerial photography. 29.5Film Processing Process, check, and annotate the aerial film. 29.6Photo Products Prepare contact prints, contact diapositives, and photo enlargements. 29.7Scanning Scan photographic images. 29.8LiDAR Includes data acquisition, post processing of LiDAR data to XYZ coordinates for "bare earth" classification. 29.9Aerial Triangulation Measure and adjust control within aerial images. 29.10 Surfaces Includes collection of break lines and spot elevations. 29.11 Ortho Generation Includes creation of final images. 29.12 Rectified Digital Imagery (Georeferenced) Create the rectified digital image. 29.13 Mosaicking Create the mosaic. 29.14 Sheet Clipping Create plot files for sheets from the database. 29.15 Topographics (31)) Prepare topographic maps including surface and planimetrics. (Photogrammetrist will not propose hours for Surfaces and Topographies.) 29.16 Planimetrics (21)) Prepare 21) planimetric map. 29.17 Drainage Basin Includes preparing drainage basin maps in clipped "sheet" format. 29.18 CADD Edit Perform final edit of graphics for delivery of required Microstation design files (. dgn), CADD, and Geopak files. 29.19 Data Merging Merge photogrammetric files, field survey files, and data from other sources. 29.20 Miscellaneous Other tasks not specifically addressed in this document. 29.21 Field Review Perform on site review of maps. 29.22 Technical Meetings Attend meetings as required. 29.23 Quality Assurance/Quality Control Establish and implement a QA/QC plan. 29.24 Supervision Supervise all photogrammetric activities. This task must be performed by the project supervisor, a Florida P.S.M. 29.25 Coordination Coordinate with all elements of the project to produce a final photogrammetric product. 30 MAPPING The CONSULTANT will be responsible for the preparation of control survey maps, right of way maps, maintenance maps, sketches, other miscellaneous survey maps, and legal descriptions as required for this project in accordance with all applicable COUNTY Manuals, Procedures, Handbooks, District specific requirements, and Florida Statutes. All maps, surveys and legal descriptions will be prepared under the direction of a Florida Professional Surveyor and Mapper (PSM) to COUNTY size and format requirements utilizing COUNTY approved software and will be designed to provide a high degree of uniformity and maximum readability. The CONSULTANT will submit maps, legal descriptions and sketches, quality assurance check prints, checklists, electronic media files and any other documents as required for this project to the COUNTY for review at stages of completion as negotiated. Master CADD File 30.1 Alignment 30.2 Section and 1/4 Section Lines 30.3 Subdivisions / Property Lines 30.4 Existing Right of Way 30.5 Topography 30.6 Parent Tract Properties and Existing Easements 30.7 Proposed Right of Way Requirements The ENGINEER OF RECORD (EOR) will provide the proposed requirements. The PSM is responsible for calculating the final geometry. Notification of Final Right of Way Requirements along with the purpose and duration of all easements will be specified in writing. 30.8 Limits of Construction The limits of construction DGN file as provided by the FOR will be imported or referenced to the master CADD file. Additional labeling will be added as required. The PSM is required to advise the FOR of any noted discrepancies between the limits of construction line and the existing/proposed right of way lines, and for making adjustments as needed when a resolution is determined. 30.9 Jurisdictional/Agency Lines These lines may include, but are not limited to, jurisdictional, wetland, water boundaries, and COUNTY limit lines. Sheet Files 30.10 Control Survey Cover Sheet 30.11 Control Survey Key Sheet 30.12 Control Survey Detail Sheet 30.13 Right of Way Map Cover Sheet 30.14 Right of Way Map Key Sheet 30.15 Right of Way Map Detail Sheet 30.16 Maintenance Map Cover Sheet 30.17 Maintenance Map Key Sheet 30.18 Maintenance Map Detail Sheet 30.19 Reference Point Sheet This sheet(s) will be included with the Control Survey Map, Right of Way Map and Maintenance Map. 30.20 Project Control Sheet This sheet depicts the baseline, the benchmarks, the primary and secondary control points and their reference points including the type of material used for each point, their XYZ coordinates, scale factors and convergence angles. This sheet(s) may be included with the Control Survey Map, Right of Way Map and Maintenance Map. 30.21 Table of Ownerships Sheet Miscellaneous Surveys and Sketches 30.22 Parcel Sketches 30.23 TIITF Sketches - N/A 30.24 Other Specific Purpose Survey(s) 30.25 Boundary Survey(s) Map 30.26 Right of Way Monumentation Map 30.27 Title Search Map 30.28 Title Search Report 30.29 Legal Descriptions 30.30 Final Map/Plans Comparison The PSM will perform a comparison of the final right of way maps with the available construction plans to review the correctness of the type of parcel to be acquired and the stations/offsets to the required right of way. The PSM will coordinate with the FOR to resolve any conflicts or discrepancies and provide documentation of the review. 30.31 Field Reviews 30.32 Technical Meetings 30.33 Quality Assurance/Quality Control 30.34 Supervision 30.35 Coordination 30.36 Supplemental Mapping This task is to cover efforts resulting from major design and/or development changes after 60% map development that affect the right of way requirements/parent tract property lines and may include any number of tasks. Request and approval to utilize the Supplemental Mapping hours will be in writing and approved by the COUNTY Project Manager prior to any work being done under this task. 31 TERRESTRIAL MOBILE LiDAR — N/A The CONSULTANT shall perform Terrestrial Mobile LiDAR tasks in accordance with all applicable statutes, manuals, guidelines, standards, handbooks, procedures, and current design memoranda. In addition to the maps and LiDAR products, the CONSULTANT shall submit all computations and reports to support the mapping. This will include documentation of all decisions reached from meetings, telephone conversations, and site visits. 31.1 Terrestrial Mobile LiDAR Mission Planning Research and prepare materials necessary for the successful execution of the Mobile LiDAR Mission. This includes but is not limited to route and safety planning, GPS /data acquisition scheduling, weather reports, and site terrain research. 31.2 Project Control Point Coordination All efforts necessary to coordinate the proper placement of project ground control i.e. base stations, transformation control points, and validation points, supporting the Mobile LiDAR survey. 31.3 Terrestrial Mobile LiDAR Mobilization Prepare the LiDAR sensor and vehicle for project data collection and get specialized personnel and equipment on site. 31.4 Terrestrial Mobile LiDAR Mission Perform site calibrations of LiDAR sensor and collect laser survey data, including any simultaneous base station GPS occupations and operation of any necessary safety equipment. 31.5 Terrestrial Mobile LiDAR Processing Download and post process collected measurement data from Mobile LiDAR vehicle sensors, and any base stations occupied during mission. Analyze Mobile LiDAR measurement points and scan route overlaps. Separate any large point cloud data sets into manageable file sizes with corresponding indexes. 31.6 Terrestrial Mobile Photography Processing Process, reference, and name digital photographic imagery files collected during Mobile LiDAR mission. 31.7 Transformation / Adjustment Adjust LiDAR point cloud data to Project Control points. Create point cloud data file(s) in approved digital format. Prepare required reports of precision and accuracy achieved. If this task is performed by separate firm, or is the final product to be delivered, include effort for Survey Report. 31.8 Classification / Editing Identify and attribute (classify) point cloud data into requested groups. Classify or remove erroneous points. 31.9 Specific Surface Reporting Prepare reports, data and/or graphics of specific surface details such as, but not limited to pavement rutting, bridge structure clearance to roadway surface. 31.10 Topographic (3D) Mapping Produce three dimensional (3D) topographic survey map(s) from collected Mobile LiDAR data. This includes final preparation of Construction Information Management (CIM) deliverable, if applicable. 31.11 Topographic (2D) Planimetric Mapping Produce two dimensional (213) planimetric map(s) from collected Mobile LiDAR data. 31.12 CADD Edits Perform final edit of graphics for delivery of required CADD files. This includes final presentation of CIM deliverable, if applicable. 31.13 Data Merging Merge Mobile LiDAR survey and mapping files, with other field survey files, and data from other sources. 31.14 Miscellaneous Other tasks not specifically addressed in this document. 31.15 Field Reviews Perform on site review of maps. 31.16 Technical Meetings Attend meetings as required. 31.17 Quality Assurance/ Quality Control Establish and implement a QA/QC plan. 31.18 Supervision Supervise all Terrestrial Mobile LiDAR activities. This task must be performed by the project supervisor, a Florida P.S.M. 31.19 Coordination Coordinate with all elements of the project to produce a final product. 32 ARCHITECTURE DEVELOPMENT — Not Applicable 33 NOISE BARRIERS IMPACT DESIGN ASSESSMENT IN THE DESIGN PHASE — (NOT -APPLICABLE - See PD&E Study) 34 INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS ANALYSIS The CONSULTANT shall analyze and document Intelligent Transportations System (ITS) Analysis Tasks in accordance with all applicable manuals, guidelines, standards, handbooks, procedures, existing ITS standard operating procedures, strategic plans, Florida's SEMP guidelines, National and regional ITS architectures, and current design memoranda. ITS work includes the application of sensor, computer, electronics and communication technologies and management strategies, in an integrated manner, to improve the safety and efficiency of the surface transportation system. ITS includes, but is not limited to, Advanced Traffic Management Systems (ATMS), Advanced Traveler Information Systems (ATIS), Advanced Rural Transportation Systems (ARTS), Advanced Public Transportation Systems (APTS), Advanced Highway Systems (AHS), Commercial Vehicle Operation (CVO) and Electronic Toll Collection (ETC) Systems. In instances where the CONSULTANT performs analysis or prepares the design packages for the deployment of ITS, the CONSULTANT will not be allowed to compete as a proposing firm or participate as a subconsultant to a proposing firm during subsequent advertisements involving work performed under this contract. 34.1 ITS Analysis The CONSULTANT shall review the approved preliminary engineering report, typical section package, traffic technical memorandum and proposed geometric design alignment to identify impacts to existing ITS components (if applicable) and proposed ITS field device placements. The CONSULTANT shall review all related District ITS plans and documentation for the project corridor to ensure all cited ITS elements are included in this project, and develop a Concept of Operations (ConOps), Project Systems Engineering Management Plan (PSEMP), RTVM, and other documents as necessary for conformance with Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) requirements. The CONSULTANT shall use applicable COUNTY and FDOT requirements and guidelines, including, but not limited to, the FDM, Standard Plans, and Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction in the design of ITS. The CONSULTANT design is expected to include the following attributes, facilities, infrastructure, ITS devices, systems, and associated work: [Insert project specifics (e.g. TMC facilities; communication system design; SunGuide software system installation or expansion; deployment of ITS device such as DMS, CCTV cameras, vehicle detection systems, etc.)] CCTV camera system shall provide 100 percent coverage of all mainline lanes, entrance and exit ramps, interchanges (includes view of crossing arterials), blind spots (such as those caused due to existing and proposed bridges, existing and proposed signage, vegetation, and horizontal and vertical curvatures). Cameras shall be spaced to meet the Project requirements, guidance from the ConOps, and as approved by the COUNTY. Vehicle detection devices shall be spaced as required to meet the Project requirements (speed, volume, and occupancy detection), guidance from the ConOps and as approved by the COUNTY. Both expressway and arterial dynamic message signs (DMS) shall be located to meet the Project requirements, guidance from the ConOps, and as approved by the COUNTY. All FDOT FDM requirements shall be met for DMS locations. DMS locations shall be designed in conjunction with the Project's master signing design. The CONSULTANT shall review the existing TMC Operations and develop additional incident management service requirements as necessary to support during the Construction Phase of the Project. The CONSULTANT shall coordinate with COUNTY and the District's Traffic Operations ITS Office for additional information regarding existing Incident Management and TMC Operational Procedures (If desired by the COUNTY or District). All ITS devices shall be compatible with the latest version of the National Transportation Communications for ITS Protocol (NTCIP) and compatible with SunGuide software platform. The CONSULTANT shall design the project such that all ITS field devices and ancillary components comply with FDOT's Approved Product List (APL) and are supported within the SunGuide software or other software approved by the COUNTY. Closed Circuit Television (CCTV) Camera Assembly The CONSULTANT shall be responsible for the design and exact field locations for the camera assemblies. The camera subsystem shall provide overlapping coverage to overcome visual blockage. Camera assemblies may include a camera lowering device (CLD). The camera subsystem shall be designed to provide additional benefits such as the monitoring of DMS operations and security surveillance of critical infrastructure elements. A stand-alone DMS confirmation camera shall be designed and installed to support TMC operations to verify and confirm the posted DMS messages (if desired by the COUNTY). The position, height, and design of each camera pole shall be finalized during the design phase of the project. Each site shall be designed for overall monitoring capability, as well as designed to provide safe and effective maintenance conditions. The camera assembly deployment shall be designed to provide fields of view that give the required corridor coverage. The CONSULTANT shall determine the camera location by performing a videography study at each proposed camera site. The study shall include video at the proposed camera location and elevation with respect to the roadway elevation. The CONSULTANT shall identify the final number and locations of the camera assemblies based on the videography study. The camera system design shall ensure that the video quality is not degraded due to wind or vibration. The CONSULTANT shall be responsible for the design of the poles and foundations to minimize the potential for vibration. The CONSULTANT shall prepare cross section plan sheets showing details of horizontal and vertical clearances of the proposed equipment with identified utilities. The CONSULTANT shall be responsible for the design of the grounding and lightning protection system based on FDOT criteria. The CCTV camera assembly shall comply with the latest version of FDOT Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction, Supplemental Specification 682. Vehicle Detection Subsystem The CONSULTANT shall select vehicle detection technology to meet the Project needs, ConOps requirements, and as approved by the COUNTY. The CONSULTANT shall be responsible for the design of a non -intrusive vehicle detection subsystem for the roadway facilities. The detectors shall be positioned near other ITS field device infrastructure including the fiber-optic splice vaults when feasible to reduce cost. Final detection station locations shall be based on a number of location variables identified during the design phase. The vehicle detection subsystem shall collect and process volume, speed and occupancy data on a lane -by -lane basis for the corridor mainlines, in both directions of travel. The data will be used by the TMC for functions including detecting incidents, determining travel times, estimating traffic conditions for dissemination to travelers, sharing information with other agencies, and data archiving for transportation planning and historical data analysis. The vehicle detection subsystem shall allow for connectivity to the TMC. Vehicle detectors must meet the Project requirements under all environmental and traffic conditions expected for the corridors. The detection system shall produce accurate volume, speed and occupancy data for all corridor traffic operation conditions. The CONSULTANT design must limit the likelihood of occlusions, other blocking of vehicles and adjacent lanes detection that degrade the detection system performance below specified accuracy. Design the system so that signs, walls, guardrails, and other physical elements do not degrade detection performance. The system shall allow remote configuration, calibration, monitoring, and diagnostic of real-time traffic activities from a remote location, such as the TMC, using the FDOT SunGuide central software and software provided by the detection system vendor. The CONSULTANT shall determine the exact location of the field devices to meet the desired coverage and functional requirements of vehicle detectors. The detector and associated cabinet locations shall be identified by the CONSULTANT. The CONSULTANT will coordinate and perform a detailed site survey with a factory trained and certified representative of the detection system manufacturer being proposed in their design. The site survey must confirm that the design does not exceed the operational capabilities of the proposed detection technology or device. The CONSULTANT shall be responsible for the design of a vehicle detection system that allows travel times to be automatically calculated for roadway facilities. The travel time system may utilize a variety of vehicle detection systems, including loop, video, microwave, wireless magnetometer, and Automatic Vehicle Identification (AVI) systems. The system shall utilize the project communications backbone in order to collect and distribute travel time data to the TMCs. When utilizing transponders, they will be read by AVI reader equipment placed at checkpoints along the roadway. As a transponder passes a checkpoint, its data shall be acquired by the AVI system. The AVI system shall automatically add the time, date, transponder reading antenna number, and the antenna location to the transponder identification code and store the data. Systems that rely upon transponders shall utilize supplemental toll tag readers placed at appropriate existing device locations as applicable, as well as interchanges and at intermediate locations throughout the project as required to provide the required coverage to satisfy travel time measurement requirements. Using the designed communications, the transponder information shall be forwarded to the TMC for further processing. The CONSULTANT shall coordinate all design efforts for use of SunPass AVI transponders with the Florida's Turnpike Enterprise (FTE) Tolls group. The vehicle detection system utilized shall comply with the latest version of FDOT Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction, Specification 660. Dynamic Message Sign Subsystem — As needed. The CONSULTANT shall be responsible for the design of the DMS subsystem for the roadway facilities. The position of each DMS shall be finalized during the design phase of the project. The CONSULTANT shall select DMS technology, type, and display to meet the Project requirements and ConOps requirements. The CONSULTANT shall locate the DMS to satisfy the required sign functionality and to provide the required visibility of the signs. The project communications system shall enable full control of the DMS from the TMC facilities. All DMS hardware, software and related infrastructure components shall be fully compatible with SunGuide software. All DMS shall include a dedicated confirmation camera that allows for visual verification of the messages posted on the DMS by a TMC Operator (if desired by the COUNTY). The CONSULTANT shall design support structures to accommodate the specified DMS to meet the design functional, operational, and maintenance requirements. The DMS shall be designed in accordance with the latest version of FDOT Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction, Supplemental Specification 700. All Highway Signing, including Dynamic Message Signs, shall comply with the latest version of FDOT Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction, Specification 700. Roadway Weather Information Systems (RWIS) -As needed. The CONSULTANT shall develop Technical Special Provisions or Modified Special Provisions for RWIS based upon the unique needs of the project. The CONSULTANT shall ensure that, each RWIS site consists of a remote processing unit (RPU), communication hardware, and determine the site -specific components as required from below: • Fog/Smoke Detection Sensor; • Classifying Precipitation; • Precipitation Occurrence Sensor; • Air Temperature/Relative Humidity Sensor; • Wind Speed and Direction Sensor; • RWIS Tower/Pole Structure, foundation, base, and cabinet with electrical service, and lightning protection & grounding assembly; and, • Communication hardware. The RWIS subsystem shall include all hardware, software, and licenses to operate, including SQL database for the TMC and RWIS Central Hardware for TMC. 34.2 Communications The CONSULTANT shall be responsible for the development of a communications plan to determine the optimal communications medium for the project corridor. The plan shall be developed prior to submittal of Phase I plans. The plan shall identify communications media alternatives and provide a cost estimate that includes initial, operations and maintenance cost for the life cycle of the communications network. The plan shall ensure that video, voice, and data will be communicated in real-time between center -to -field and center -to -center (C2C) nodes as applicable. The communications system design must utilize non-proprietary, open -architecture, standards -based, robust, scalable, and proven technology. The communication plan analysis shall address communication and connections between field devices, communications and connections between field devices and the TMC, center - to -center communications between TMCs, and any other communication links or connections required to meet project goals. The plan must include bandwidth analysis and recommendations, needs assessment, and provide recommendations regarding minimum requirements, media, network devices, protocols, network topology, communication redundancy, future needs, spare capacity, and any communications or data sharing with other agencies. After approval of the plan, the CONSULTANT shall submit a revised plan including a detailed design analysis for each submittal. The CONSULTANT's communications design shall include multiple redundant paths for each location, which allows for automatic switching of communications path onto a secondary path, if the primary path is impacted (if desired by the COUNTY). The communications system components shall be in accordance with Sections 630, 633, and 635 of the latest FDOT Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction (online edition). 34.3 Grounding and Lightning Protection The CONSULTANT shall be responsible for a complete and reliable grounding and lightning protection design to provide personnel and equipment protection against faults, surge currents and lightning transients. The grounding and lightning protection system shall be designed in accordance with the latest version of the FDOT Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction, Specification 620. 34.4 Power Subsystem The CONSULTANT shall be responsible for an electrical design in accordance with all NEC requirements. No solar power should be utilized as a power solution for the Project unless otherwise approved by the COUNTY. To enhance power reliability, the CONSULTANT shall design a power distribution and backup system consisting of, at a minimum, underground power conduits and conductors, transformers, generators, automatic transfer switches, UPS, and all associated equipment. The power backup system shall supply electrical power in event of commercial power supply failure for all system components. Power equipment shall be installed in areas to avoid wet locations. All connections and equipment shall be protected from moisture and water intrusion. The CONSULTANT shall ensure that vandal resistant mechanisms for all electrical infrastructure shall be included as part of the Design. The CONSULTANT shall submit the power system design and voltage drop calculations for the power distribution system as part of phase II, III, and IV design submittals. The CONSULTANT shall conduct a short circuit and protection coordination study for the designed power system and document the study as part of the power system design report. 34.5 Voltage Drop Calculations The electrical design shall address allowable voltage drops per the NEC. The CONSULTANT shall submit voltage drop calculations for any electrical circuit providing power to the ITS field devices beyond the electric utility service point. The calculations shall document the length of each circuit, its load, the size conductor or conductors used and their ohm resistance values and the required voltages from the service point to the respective ITS devices to maintain voltage drops with allowable limits. The voltage drop incurred on each circuit (total volts and percentage of drop) shall be calculated, and all work necessary to calculate the voltage drop values for each circuit should be presented in such a manner as to be duplicated by the District. Load analysis calculations shall be submitted. All voltage drop calculations shall allow for future expansion of ITS infrastructure, if identified in the Project ConOps. 34.6 Design Documentation The CONSULTANT shall submit a Design Documentation Book with each plan submittal under separate cover and not part of the roadway documentation book. At a minimum, the design documentation book shall include: • Computation books for all applicable items on plans. • Phase submittal checklist. • Three-way quantity check list • Structural calculations for all structures • Voltage drop calculations. • Load analysis calculations. 34.7 Existing ITS The CONSULTANT shall research any required legacy system or system components that may be impacted by new work, such as: existing communications; existing types, numbers, locations, models, manufacturers, and age of ITS devices; as -built plans; existing operating software; existing center -to -field devices; and C2C communications and capabilities. 34.8 Queue Analysis The CONSULTANT shall perform a queue analysis at high volume interchanges and high frequency conflict / crash locations to determine optimal placement of DMS using project forecasted traffic volumes. This analysis shall be performed prior to submittal of the Phase I plans. The CONSULTANT shall perform other traffic engineering analysis as necessary to ensure that the DMS locations are selected based on optimum message delivery to the motorists. 34.9 Reference and Master ITS Design File The CONSULTANT shall prepare the ITS design file to include all necessary design elements and the reference files for topo, R/W roadway, utilities files, etc. This effort includes the design and layout of proposed ITS devices, including but not limited to: CCTV / Detection poles, DMS, detection devices, advanced traffic controllers, conduit, cabinet -related pull boxes, service points, fiber optic sizing, and communications hubs. All existing ITS infrastructure shall be referenced to the new ITS plan sheets (if applicable). 34.10 Reference and Master Communications Design File The CONSULTANT shall prepare the communication design file to include all necessary design elements and all associated reference files as well as reference files of topo, R/W, roadway, utilities files, existing ITS communications infrastructure, etc. This effort includes design and layout of proposed communications conduit, cabinet, pull boxes, splice boxes, standard route markers, communications plan overview, fiber optic splicing, connections, communications hubs, etc. 34.11 Pole Elevation Analysis The CONSULTANT shall evaluate pole elevation requirements and design pole heights to meet the Project requirements including field of view; elimination of occlusion; site access for maintenance vehicles and personnel; access to pole mounted equipment, such as CCTV cameras, traffic detectors, and cabinets; and probability of lightning strike. 34.12 Sign Panel Design Analysis The CONSULTANT shall design all ITS signing in conjunction with the Roadway Master Signing. This includes any static sign panel that includes changeable message elements. Arterial full size DMS shall not be co -located with other static signs. 34.13 Quantities The CONSULTANT shall include all work required to determine the quantities for all items, including ITS structures and devices, interconnect, and infrastructure (such as conduits, pull boxes, splice boxes, fusion splices, splice enclosures, etc.). This work effort shall include generating accurate quantities for computing the engineer's estimate as required by the COUNTY. Use digital submittal of plans as required by the COUNTY. 34.14 Cost Estimate The CONSULTANT shall prepare an engineer's cost estimate for the project using historical data from the FDOT or from other Industry sources. The CONSULTANT shall also load the pay items and quantities into AASHTOWare Project Preconstruction for generating the Summary of Pay Items and the FDOT's in-house estimates. 34.15 Technical Special Provisions and Modified Special Provisions The CONSULTANT shall develop Technical Special Provisions (TSP) and Modified Special Provisions (MSP) for the specific items or conditions of the project that are not addressed in the FDOT's Standard Specifications, Supplemental Specifications and Special Provisions. 34.16 Other ITS Analyses — N/A 34.17 Field Reviews The CONSULTANT shall conduct a field review for the required phase submittals. The review shall identify necessary data for all elements of the project including, but not limited to, the following: • Existing ITS Field Devices as compared with the latest FDOT standards and COUNTY requirements • Device Make, Model, Capabilities, Condition / Age, Existence of SunGuide Software Driver • Condition of Structure(s), cabinets, and other above -ground infrastructure and devices • Type of Detection as Compared with Current COUNTY Standards • Underground Infrastructure • Proximity of other utilities • Traffic Operations • Any other field reconnaissance as necessary to develop a complete ITS design package 34.18 Technical Meetings The CONSULTANT shall attend meetings as necessary support the project. 34.19 Quality Assurance / Quality Control The CONSULTANT shall be responsible for the professional quality, technical accuracy and coordination of designs, drawings, specifications, and other services and work furnished by the CONSULTANT under this contract. The CONSULTANT shall provide a Quality Control Plan that describes the procedures to be utilized to verify, independently check, and review all design drawings, specifications, and other documentation prepared as a part of the contract. The CONSULTANT shall describe how the checking and review processes are to be documented to verify that the required procedures were followed. The Quality Control Plan may be one utilized by the CONSULTANT as part of their normal operation or may be one specifically designed for this project. The CONSULTANT shall utilize the District's quality control checklist. The responsible Professional Engineer that performed the Quality Control review shall sign a statement certifying that the review was conducted. The CONSULTANT shall, without additional compensation, correct all errors or deficiencies in their works. 34.20 Supervision The CONSULTANT shall provide all efforts required to supervise all technical design activities. 34.21 Coordination The CONSULTANT shall coordinate with Survey, Geotech, Drainage, Structures, Lighting, Roadway Design, Utilities, municipalities, maintaining agencies and Traffic Operations to produce a final set of construction contract documents and to ensure that a high degree of accuracy for the design plans is achieved. 35 INTELLIGENT TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS PLANS The CONSULTANT shall prepare a set of ITS Plans in accordance with the FDOT Design Manual that includes the following: 35.1 Key Sheet The CONSULTANT shall prepare the key sheet in accordance with the latest format depicted in the FDOT Design Manual, MUTCD, Standard Specs, and Standard Plans. 35.2 Summary of Pay Items Including Designer Interface Quantity Input The CONSULTANT shall include quantity input into Designer Interface and create the CADD generated sheet. 35.3 Tabulation of Quantities The CONSULTANT shall place pay item numbers, descriptions, quantities and grand totals on the tabulation sheet(s) and provide updating of the tabulation of quantities sheets during the design period. 35.4 General Notes / Pay Item Notes The CONSULTANT shall include all pertinent general notes and pay item notes as deemed fit and as established by the District and the COUNTY. 35.5 Project Layout The CONSULTANT shall prepare plan sheet(s) with an overview of the entire project that include stations and offsets, project limits, intersection locations, devices, device identification using SunGuide nomenclature, and plan sheet coverage. 35.6 Typical and Special Details The CONSULTANT shall prepare typical and / or special details for conditions in the project not addressed by the COUNTY's Standard Plans for Design, Construction, Maintenance, and Utility Operations on the State Highway System. The CONSULTANT shall prepare special details not addressed by FDOT Standard Plans, including block diagrams, hub cabinets, wiring diagrams, solar power service, and special mounting details. 35.7 Plan Sheet The CONSULTANT shall prepare the ITS plan sheets utilizing the Design file to include all necessary information related to the project design elements and all associated reference files. The plan sheets shall include general and pay item notes and pay items. The plans shall depict the location of pull boxes, splice boxes, conduit runs and device locations with setbacks from the travel way. Devices shall be located by station and offset. 35.8 ITS Communications Plans The CONSULTANT shall prepare plans for the communications network. These plans shall consist of block diagrams, splicing diagrams, port assignments, wiring diagrams, and all other information necessary to convey the design concept to the contractor. These plans shall be included in the ITS plan set and be prepared in a manner consistent with immediately adjacent ITS project installations (planned or installed). The communication system shall be an open -architecture, non-proprietary, real-time, multimedia communications network. The communication system design must be compatible and completely interoperable with the existing systems. [Discuss any needs or allowance for temporary communication connectivity options here]. The CONSULTANT's design shall include protecting and maintaining the existing ITS infrastructure. For locations where existing ITS infrastructure is impacted, the CONSULTANT's design shall include mitigation to minimize the downtime of existing system as per the COUNTY's requirements. The CONSULTANT is responsible for the design of the communication infrastructure and its integration with the COUNTY's communication system. Additionally, the CONSULTANT shall determine the most cost effective, best performing, communication connectivity option. The communication system must allow command and control as well as data and video transmission between the field devices and the TMCs at [insert location]. Conduit paths shall be selected to provide a continuous duct system on one side of the road unless otherwise requested by the FDOT. The various components of ITS deployment will be located on both sides of the freeway and therefore under pavement bore and lateral conduits will be necessary to access equipment locations. The CONSULTANT shall produce fiber optic cable splicing diagrams to show the connectivity of the fiber optic cable from its termini at field devices to the TMC. The diagrams shall denote new and existing fiber routes, splices, and terminations involved in the work. The diagrams shall identify cables by size, tube color / number and stand colors / numbers. All cables shall be identified either by numbering system identified either by numbering system identified on the plans or by bounding devices. The diagrams shall denote the types of connectors in the patch panels. 35.9 Fiber Optic Splice Diagrams The CONSULTANT shall produce fiber optic cable splicing diagrams to show the connectivity of the fiber optic cable from its termini at field devices to the TMC. The diagrams shall denote new and existing fiber routes, splices, and terminations involved in the work. The diagrams shall identify cables by size, tube color / number and stand colors / numbers. All cables shall be identified either by numbering system identified either by numbering system identified on the plans or by bounding devices. The diagrams shall denote the types of connectors in the patch panels. 35.10 Grounding and Lightning Protection Plans The CONSULTANT shall include efforts to design a complete and reliable lightning protection design for each pole and associated devices, ITS device installation, as well as device cabinets and communications hubs, etc. if not already addressed in the FDOT's Standard Plans for Design, Construction, Maintenance and Utility Operations on the State Highway System. 35.11 Cross Sections The CONSULTANT shall prepare cross sections for ITS devices. 35.12 Guide Sign Work Sheet(s) — As needed. The CONSULTANT shall prepare the guide sign work sheets to include all necessary information related to the design of the static and dynamic message signs in the project corridor. 35.13 Special Service Point Details The CONSULTANT shall design any special service point and electrical distribution system beyond the electric utility company's service point. The plan shall depict with pay items, general and plan notes the locations of transformers, switches, disconnects, conduits, pull boxes and power conductors. The plans shall identify the location of underground and overhead service points with identifying pole and transformer numbers. 35.14 Strain Pole Schedule — As needed. The CONSULTANT shall incorporate the schedule detail chart for concrete or steel strain poles in the plan set. 35.15 Overhead / Cantilever Sign Structure — As needed. For overhead truss and cantilever mounted devices, the CONSULTANT shall evaluate pertinent data and information to develop the layout for locating and mounting devices to the horizontal element of the structure and coordinate the design of the structures with the roadway and structural engineers. The CONSULTANT shall be responsible for determining the overhead/cantilever structure requirements for proper installation of the DMS, viewing angle and site distance requirement as per Chapter 2e — Guide Signs -Freeways and Expressways in the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) and Florida COUNTY of Transportation FDOT Design Manual (FDM) and all other applicable manuals and guidelines as per governing regulations. 35.16 Other Overhead Sign Structures (Long Span, Monotube, etc.) — As needed. For other overhead sign structures, the CONSULTANT shall evaluate pertinent data and information to develop layout for locating and mounting device to the horizontal element of the structure and coordinate the design of the structures with the roadway and structural engineers. The CONSULTANT shall be responsible for determining the requirements for other type of structures (long span, monotube, etc.) used as part of the project for proper installation of the DMS, viewing angle and site distance requirement as per Chapter 2e — Guide Signs -Freeways and Expressways in the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) and Florida COUNTY of Transportation FDOT Design Manual (FDM) and all other applicable manuals and guidelines as per governing regulations. 35.17 Temporary Traffic Control Plans The CONSULTANT shall prepare Temporary Traffic Control Plans (TTCP) to minimize impact to traffic during the construction of ITS field devices and associated communications infrastructure that will be deployed along the project corridor. The TTCP shall strive to maintain and sustain center -to -field device connectivity and operability to the ITS field devices previously deployed along the project corridor. The TTCP effort shall consider and mitigate the impacts of the project's various construction phases so as to sustain center -to -field devices connectivity and operability, maintaining operational quality as a minimum at the level provided prior to construction start and minimizing down time as much as possible. The CONSULTANT shall develop the TTCP sheets for the project, providing temporary communications as necessary, notes, details, and direction applicable to the ITS elements and associated communications for inclusion in the TTCP. The CONSULTANT shall review the existing TMC Operations and develop additional incident management service requirements as necessary to support during the Construction Phase of the Project. The CONSULTANT shall coordinate with District's Traffic Operations ITS Office for additional information regarding existing Incident Management and TMC Operational Procedures. 35.18 Interim Standards The CONSULTANT shall adhere to all COUNTY's Interim Standards for ITS applications. 35.19 GIS Data and Asset Management Requirements The CONSULTANT is responsible for providing Geographic Information System (GIS), spatial data, for the ITS components design. This information is required to integrate ITS components to the SunGuide software. A coordinate point compatible with the Florida State Plane System or FDOT's current coordinate plane system shall be collected for all ITS components part of the Project design. All GIS information provided shall be compatible with the FDOT's ITS FM asset management software. The information shall be transferred to the as -built plans and submitted to the COUNTY in electronic format along with the as -built plans. The Global Positioning System (GPS) unit shall be provided by the CONSULTANT and used to collect data with a minimum accuracy of three (3) meters when differentially corrected. The CONSULTANT shall collect spatial data points and physical address location for: • DMS location (mainline and arterial) • Vehicle detection pole location • CCTV camera pole location • Ground mounted cabinets • Fiber optic cable path (fiber backbone) • Communications hubs • Standard route markers • Lateral fiber optic cable connections • Lateral power cable connections • Pull boxes (power and fiber) • Splice boxes • Power drops (service point and cable path) 35.20 Quality Assurance / Quality Control The CONSULTANT shall utilize the District's quality control checklist for traffic design drawings in addition to the QC effort described in section three. 35.21 Supervision The CONSULTANT shall supervise all technical design activities. 36 GEOTECHNICAL The CONSULTANT shall, for each project, be responsible for a complete geotechnical investigation. All work performed by the CONSULTANT shall be in accordance with COUNTY standards, or as otherwise directed by the District Geotechnical Engineer. The District Geotechnical Engineer will make interpretations and changes regarding geotechnical standards, policies and procedures and provide guidance to the CONSULTANT. Before beginning each phase of investigation and after the Notice to Proceed is given, the CONSULTANT shall submit an investigation plan for approval and meet with the COUNTY Project Manager to review the project scope and FDOT and COUNTY requirements. The investigation plan shall include, but not be limited to, the proposed boring locations and depths, and all existing geotechnical information from available sources to generally describe the surface and subsurface conditions of the project site. Additional meetings may be required to plan any additional field efforts, review plans, resolve plans/report comments, resolve responses to comments, and/or any other meetings necessary to facilitate the project. The CONSULTANT shall notify the COUNTY in adequate time to schedule a representative to attend all related meetings and field activities. A subsoil investigation plan shall be submitted to the COUNTY for approval prior to site investigation. Muck and cap rock conditions are typical to Southwest Florida. Not encountering muck and cap rock is outside the norm in Collier County. The presence of both must be identified and quantified in the soils report for the project. To do this may require additional hand holes in muck and deeper drill holes to penetrate the cap rock and identify the soil layers below than was originally shown in the investigation plan. The Soils Report shall contain a signed statement by the Geotechnical Engineer that they have walked the project site and verified to the best of their ability that information provided in the report is representative of what the surface conditions and vegetation suggest would exist below. Where cap rock is expected to be encountered in the installation of stormwater pipe and other structures, the pay items "Rock Trench Excavation" and "muck removal" (if encountered) shall be provided. All Geotechnical work shall meet the minimum requirements of the FDOT Soils and Foundations Handbook. 36.1Document Collection and Review CONSULTANT will review printed literature including topographic maps, COUNTY agricultural maps, aerial photography (including historic photos), ground water resources, geology bulletins, potentiometric maps, pile driving records, historic construction records and other geotechnical related resources. Prior to field reconnaissance, CONSULTANT shall review U.S.G.S., S.C.S. and potentiometric maps, and identify areas with problematic soil and groundwater conditions. Roadway The CONSULTANT shall be responsible for coordination of all geotechnical related field work activities. The CONSULTANT shall retain all samples until acceptance of 100% plans. Rock cores shall be retained as directed in writing by the COUNTY Project Manager. The CONSULTANT shall perform specialized field-testing in accordance with the FDOT Soils and Foundation Handbook and as required by project needs which may include but not be limited to: ■ Roadway auger borings every 100 feet to a depth of 6 feet. ■ LBR sampling and testing at 3 per mile. ■ Pavement core sampling and testing at 1 sample per 1,000 feet. ■ Corrosion series testing at sample per abundant stratum per 1,000 feet ■ Buried storm sewer system SPT borings to a depth of 20 feet every 500 feet ■ SPT borings on all corners of intersection for all new signals and/or mast arm to a depth of 25 feet. ■ Two corrosion series tests at each intersection location ■ Two SPT borings to a depth of 25 feet at each wet detention pond location ■ Two borehole permeability tests at each wet detention pond location ■ Piezometer installations at 1 per pond for Seasonal High Groundwater Level (SHGWL) determinations ■ Exfiltration test per 500 feet of exfiltration trench If required by the COUNTY Project Manager, a preliminary roadway exploration shall be performed before the 30% plans submittal. The preliminary roadway exploration will be performed, and results provided to the Engineer of Record to assist in setting roadway grades and locating potential problem areas. The preliminary roadway exploration shall be performed as directed in writing by the COUNTY Project Manager. CONSULTANT shall perform specialized field-testing as required by project needs and as directed in writing by the COUNTY Project Manager. All laboratory testing and classification will be performed in accordance with applicable FDOT standards, ASTM Standards or AASHTO Standards, unless otherwise specified in the Contract Documents. 36.2 Develop Detailed Boring Location Plan Develop a detailed boring location plan. Meet with COUNTY Geotechnical Project Manager for boring plan approval. If the drilling program expects to encounter artesian conditions, the CONSULTANT shall submit a methodology(s) for plugging the borehole to the COUNTY for approval prior to commencing with the boring program. 36.3 Stake Borings/Utility Clearance Stake borings and obtain utility clearance. Perform two corrosion series tests at each intersection location. 36.4 Muck Probing Probe standing water and surficial muck in a detailed pattern sufficient for determining removal limits to be shown in the Plans. 36.5 Coordinate and Develop TTCP for Field Investigation Coordinate and develop Temporary Traffic Control Plan (TTCP). All work zone traffic control will be performed in accordance with the COUNTY's Standard Plans Index 102 series. 36.6 Drilling Access Permits Obtain all State, COUNTY, and Water Management District permits for performing geotechnical borings, as needed. 36.7 Property Clearances Notify property tenants in person of drilling and field activities, if applicable. Written notification to property owners/tenants is the responsibility of the CONSULTANT. The CONSULTANT shall be responsible for assembling a list of all property owners where access is required for conducting geotechnical investigations. A standardized letter shall be prepared by the CONSULTANT for review and approval by the COUNTY prior to notifying affected property owners. 36.8 Groundwater Monitoring Monitor groundwater, using piezometers. 36.9LBR / Resilient Modulus Sampling Collect appropriate samples for Limerock Bearing Ratio (LBR) testing. Deliver Resilient Modulus samples to a location as directed by the COUNTY. 36.10 Coordination of Field Work Coordinate all field work required to provide geotechnical data for the project. 36.11 Soil and Rock Classification — Roadway Refine soil profiles recorded in the field, based on results of laboratory testing. 36.12 Design LBR Determine design LBR values from the 90% and mean methods when LBR testing is required by the COUNTY. 36.13 Laboratory Data Tabulate laboratory test results for inclusion in the geotechnical report, the report of tests sheet (Roadway Soil Survey Sheet), and for any necessary calculations and analyses. 36.14 Seasonal High -Water Table Review the encountered ground water levels and estimate seasonal high ground water levels. Estimate seasonal low ground water levels, if requested. 36.15 Parameters for Water Retention Areas Calculate parameters for water retention areas, exfiltration trenches, and/or swales. 36.16 Delineate Limits of Unsuitable Material Delineate limits of unsuitable material(s) in both horizontal and vertical directions. Assist the Engineer of Record with detailing these limits on the cross -sections. If requested, prepare a plan view of the limits of unsuitable material. 36.17 Electronic Files for Cross -Sections Create electronic files of boring data for cross -sections. 36.18 Embankment Settlement and Stability Estimate the total magnitude and time rate of embankment settlements. Calculate the factor of safety against slope stability failure. 36.19 Monitor Existing Structures Coordinate with FOR and structural engineer (when applicable) to identify and develop mitigation strategies for sensitive structures and facilities which require special considerations for settlement, vibration and/or groundwater monitoring by the contractor during construction. When there is risk of damage to the structure or facility, provide recommendations in the geotechnical report addressing project specific needs and coordinate those locations with the EOR. See PPM Volume I Chapter 34 and Chapter 9 of the Soils and Foundations Handbook. 36.20 Stormwater Volume Recovery and/or Background Seepage Analysis Perform stormwater volume recovery analysis in consultation with the EOR. 36.21 Geotechnical Recommendations Provide geotechnical recommendations regarding the proposed roadway construction project including the following: description of the site/alignment, design recommendations and discussion of any special considerations (i.e. removal of unsuitable material, consolidation of weak soils, estimated settlement time/amount, groundwater control, high groundwater conditions relative to pavement base, etc.) Evaluate and recommend types of geosynthetics and properties for various applications, as required. 36.22 Pavement Condition Survey and Pavement Evaluation Report If a pavement evaluation is performed, submit the report in accordance with Section 3.2 of the Materials Manual: Flexible Pavement Coring and Evaluation. Enter all core information into the Pavement Coring and Reporting (PCR) system. 36.23 Preliminary Roadway Report If a preliminary roadway investigation is performed, submit a preliminary roadway report before the Phase I plans submittal. The purpose of the preliminary roadway report will be to assist in setting road grades and locating potential problems. • Copies of U.S.G.S. and S.C.S. maps with project limits shown. • A report of tests sheet that summarizes the laboratory test results, the soil stratification (i.e. soils grouped into layers of similar materials) and construction recommendations relative to Standard Plans Indices 120-001 and 120-002. • The results of all tasks discussed in all previous sections regarding data interpretation and analysis. • An appendix that contains stratified soil boring profiles, laboratory test data sheets, sample embankment settlement and stability calculations, design LBR calculation/graphs, and other pertinent calculations. The CONSULTANT will respond in writing to any changes and/or comments from the COUNTY and submit any responses and revised reports. 36.24 Final Report The Final Roadway Report shall include the following: • Copies of U.S.G.S. and S.C.S. maps with project limits shown. • A report of tests sheet that summarizes the laboratory test results, the soil stratification (i.e. soils grouped into layers of similar materials) and construction recommendations relative to Standard Plans Indices 120-001 and 120-002. • The results of all tasks discussed in all previous sections regarding data interpretation and analysis. • An appendix that contains stratified soil boring profiles, laboratory test data sheets, sample embankment settlement and stability calculations, design LBR calculation/graphs, and other pertinent calculations. • The CONSULTANT will respond in writing to any changes and/or comments from the COUNTY and submit any responses and revised reports. 36.25 Auger Boring Drafting The auger borings shall be every 100 feet to a depth of 6 feet. 36.26 SPT Boring Drafting Draft SPT borings as directed by the COUNTY. The CONSULTANT shall be responsible for coordination of all geotechnical related fieldwork activities. The CONSULTANT shall retain all samples until acceptance of 100% plans. Rock cores shall be retained as directed in writing by the COUNTY Project Manager. CONSULTANT shall perform specialized field-testing as required by needs of project and as directed in writing by the COUNTY Project Manager. All laboratory testing and classification will be performed in accordance with applicable FDOT standards, ASTM Standards or AASHTO Standards, unless otherwise specified in the Contract Documents. The staff hour tasks for high embankment fills and structural foundations for bridges, box culverts, walls, high -mast lighting, overhead signs, mast arm signals, strain poles, buildings, and other structures include the following: 36.27 Develop Detailed Boring Location Plan Develop a detailed boring location plan. Meet with THE COUNTY Project Manager for boring plan approval. If the drilling program expects to encounter artesian conditions, the CONSULTANT shall submit a methodology(s) for plugging the borehole to the COUNTY for approval prior to commencing with the boring program. 36.28 Stake Borings/Utility Clearance Stake borings and obtain utility clearance. 36.29 Coordinate and Develop TTCP for Field Investigation Coordinate and develop TTCP plan. All work zone traffic control will be performed in accordance with the FDOT's Standard Plans Index 102 series. 36.30 Drilling Access Permits Obtain all State, COUNTY, and Water Management District permits for performing geotechnical borings, as needed. 36.31 Property Clearances Notify property tenants in person of drilling and field activities, if applicable. Written notification to property owners/tenants is the responsibility of the CONSULTANT. 36.32 Collection of Corrosion Samples Collect corrosion samples for determination of environmental classifications. 36.33 Coordination of Field Work Coordinate all field work required to provide geotechnical data for the project. 36.34 Soil and Rock Classification — Structures Soil profiles recorded in the field should be refined based on the results of laboratory testing. 36.35 Tabulation of Laboratory Data Laboratory test results should be tabulated for inclusion in the geotechnical report and for the necessary calculations and analyses. 36.36 Estimate Design Groundwater Level for Structures Review encountered groundwater levels, estimate seasonal high groundwater levels, and evaluate groundwater levels for structure design. 36.37 Selection of Foundation Alternatives (BDR) Evaluation and selection of foundation alternative, including the following: • GRS-IBS • Spread footings • Prestressed concrete piling - various sizes • Steel H- piles • Steel pipe piles • Drilled shafts • Foundation analyses shall be performed using approved FDOT methods. Assist in selection of the most economical, feasible foundation alternative. 36.38 Detailed Analysis of Selected Foundation Alternate(s) — N/A 36.39 Bridge Construction and Testing Recommendations — N/A 36.40 Lateral Load Analysis (Optional) - N/A 36.41 Walls Provide the design soil profile(s), which include the soil model/type of each layer and all soil engineering properties required by the Engineer of Record for conventional wall analyses and recommendations. Review wall design for geotechnical compatibility and constructability. Evaluate the external stability of conventional retaining walls and retained earth wall systems. For retained earth wall systems, calculate and provide minimum soil reinforcement lengths versus wall heights, and soil parameters assumed in analysis. Estimate differential and total (long term and short term) settlements. Provide wall construction recommendations. 36.42 Sheet Pile Wall Analysis (Optional) — N/A 36.43 Design Soil Parameters for Signs, Signals, and Strain Poles and Geotechnical Recommendations Provide the design soil profile(s) that include the soil model/type of each layer and all soil properties required by the Engineer of Record for foundation design. Review design for geotechnical compatibility and constructability. 36.44 Box Culvert Analysis (CR-846 over Corkscrew Canal) • Provide the design soil profile(s) that include the soil model/type of each layer and all soil properties required by the Engineer of Record for foundation design. Review design for geotechnical compatibility and constructability. • Provide lateral earth pressure coefficients. • Provide preliminary box culvert construction and design recommendations. • Estimate differential and total (long term and short term) settlements. • Evaluate wingwall stability. 36.45 Preliminary Report — BDR The preliminary structures report shall contain the following discussions as appropriate for the assigned project: • Copies of U.S.G.S. and S.C.S. maps with project limits shown. • Summary of structure background data, S.C.S., U.S.G.S., geologic and potentiometric data. • The results of all tasks discussed in all previous sections regarding data interpretation and analysis). • Recommendations for foundation installation, or other site preparation soils -related construction considerations with plan sheets as necessary. • Any special provisions required for construction that are not addressed in the FDOT's Standard specification. • An Appendix which includes SPT and CPT boring/sounding profiles, data from any specialized field tests, engineering analysis, notes/sample calculations, sheets showing ultimate bearing capacity curves versus elevation for piles and drilled shafts, a complete FHWA check list, pile driving records (if available), and any other pertinent information. 36.46 Final Report - Bridge and Associated Walls — N/A 36.47 Final Reports - Signs, Signals The final reports shall include the following: • Copies of U.S.G.S. and S.C.S. maps with project limits shown. • Summary of structure background data, S.C.S., U.S.G.S., geologic and potentiometric data. • The results of all tasks discussed in all previous sections regarding data interpretation and analysis). • Recommendations for foundation installation, or other site preparation soils -related construction considerations with plan sheets as necessary. • Any special provisions required for construction that are not addressed in the FDOT's Standard specification. • An Appendix which includes SPT and CPT boring/sounding profiles, data from any specialized field tests, engineering analysis, notes/sample calculations, sheets showing ultimate bearing capacity curves versus elevation for piles and drilled shafts, a complete FHWA check list, pile driving records (if available), and any other pertinent information. Final reports will incorporate comments from the COUNTY and contain any additional field or laboratory test results, recommended foundation alternatives along with design parameters and special provisions for the contract plans. These reports will be submitted to the COUNTY Project Manager for review prior to project completion. After review by the COUNTY, the reports will be submitted to the COUNTY Project Manager in final form and will include the following: All original plan sheets (I I" x 17") One set of all plan and specification documents, in electronic format, according to COUNTY requirements Two sets of record prints Six sets of any special provisions All reference and support documentation used in preparation of contract plans package Additional final reports (up to four), aside from stated above, may be needed and requested for the COUNTY's Project Manager and other disciplines. The final reports, special provisions, as well as record prints, will be signed and sealed by a Professional Engineer licensed in the State of Florida. Draft the detailed boring/sounding standard sheet, including environmental classification, results of laboratory testing, and specialized construction requirements, for inclusion in final plans. 36.48 SPT Boring Drafting Prepare a complete set of drawings to include all SPT borings, auger borings and other pertinent soils information in the plans. Include these drawings in the Final Geotechnical Report. Draft borings, location map, S.C.S. map and U.S.D.A. map as directed by the COUNTY. Soil symbols must be consistent with those presented in the latest Florida Department of Transportation Soils and Foundations Handbook. 36.49 Other Geotechnical Other geotechnical effort specifically required for the project as determined by the COUNTY and included in the geotechnical upset limit. 36.50 Technical Special Provisions and Modified Special Provisions 36.51 Field Reviews Identify and note surface soil and rock conditions, surface water conditions and locations, and preliminary utility conflicts. Observe and note nearby structures and foundation types. 36.52 Technical Meetings 36.53 Quality Assurance/Quality Control 36.54 Supervision 36.55 Coordination 37 3D MODELING — N/A The CONSULTANT shall analyze and document Roadway Tasks in accordance with all applicable manuals, guidelines, standards, handbooks, procedures, and current design memorandums. The CONSULTANT shall deliver all master design files, 3D surface design models, and all supporting digital files for the development of plans as required in the FDOT CADD Manual. The CONSULTANT shall prepare a 3D model using the latest FDOT software in accordance with the FDOT CADD Manual. Includes all efforts required for developing files for 3D deliverables supporting automated machine guidance for design models. This includes importing survey data and creation of existing 3D surface features and models and developing proposed corridor models with necessary detail of features to depict the proposed project in 3D to comply with the FDOT CADD Manual. The CONSULTANT shall add detail to the corridor and design model for 3D design. Includes many elements that contribute to this including but not limited to slope transitions, typical section transitions, changes in pavement depth, berms, swales/ditches, and other feature transitions. Extra corridor structure leads to extra assemblies, extra targeting, etc. The CONSULTANT shall create an accurate roadway design model which includes modeling the intersections. The CONSULTANT shall submit Agn files associated with the 3D Model and their respective components. 37.1 Phase I 3D Design Model The CONSULTANT shall prepare, submit and present for approval by the COUNTY, Phase I 3D interactive model, comprised of, but not limited to: Existing features (pavement, shoulders, sidewalk, curb/gutter, utilities -if required per scope, drainage - if required per scope) and proposed corridor(s). 37.2 Phase II 3D Design Model The CONSULTANT shall prepare, submit and present for approval by the COUNTY, Phase II 3D model, comprised of, but not limited to: Modification of the Phase I model to update the model to comply with changes based on the Phase I review comments and to include the addition of ponds, floodplain compensation sites, retaining walls, barrier walls, guardrail terminals, cross overs, gore areas, side street connections, roundabouts, and driveways. [List optional services to be included, i.e. Curb Ramps, Closed Drainage Network, Bridge Modeling, Bridge Abutment, Overhead sign post/structures with foundation, Toll gantry and overhead DMS structures with foundation, proposed utilities (pressure pipe/gravity), etc.]. 37.3 Phase III 3D Design Model The CONSULTANT shall prepare, submit and present for approval by the COUNTY, Phase III 3D model and deliverables files for review, comprised of, but not limited to: Modification of the Phase II model to update the model to comply with changes based on the Phase II review comments and to further refine areas of transition between templates, detailed grading areas, bridge approaches and end bents, median noses, shoulder transition areas, retaining walls, barrier walls and guardrail. 37.4 Final 3D Model Design The CONSULTANT shall prepare for approval by COUNTY, the Phase IV 3D model, comprised of, but not limited to: Modification of the Phase III model to update the model to comply with changes based on the phase III review comments and to accurately generate, export and otherwise prepare the final 3D deliverable files as described in the FDOT CADD Manual. 37.5 Cross Section Design Files The CONSULTANT shall establish and develop cross section design files in accordance with the FDOT CADD manual and FDOT Design Manual. Includes all work required to establish and utilize intelligent/automated methods for creating cross sections including determining the locations for which all cross sections will be shown, existing and proposed features, cross section refinement, placement of utilities and drainage, soil boxes, R/W lines, earthwork calculations, and other required labeling. 37.6 Template and Assembly Development (Optional) The CONSULTANT shall prepare for approval by COUNTY, project specific templates/assemblies needed to develop the features required to deliver the 3D model. 37.7 Quality Assurance/Quality Control 37.8 Supervision 37.9 Coordination 38 PROJECT REQUIREMENTS 38.1 Liaison Office The COUNTY and the CONSULTANT will designate a Liaison Office and a Project Manager who shall be the representative of their respective organizations for the Project. While it is expected the CONSULTANT shall seek and receive advice from various state, regional, and local agencies, the final direction on all matters of this project remain with the COUNTY Project Manager. 38.2 Key Personnel The CONSULTANT's work shall be performed and directed by the key personnel identified in the proposal presentations by the CONSULTANT. Any changes in the indicated personnel shall be subject to review and approval by COUNTY. 38.3 Progress Reporting The CONSULTANT shall meet with the COUNTY as required and shall provide a written monthly progress report with approved schedule, schedule status, and payout curve or by using the earned value method that describe the work performed on each task. The report will include assessing project risk through monthly documentation of identifying and updating the risk category and approach for monitoring those tasks. Invoices shall be submitted after the COUNTY approves the monthly progress report and the payout curve or with earned value analysis. The Project Manager will make judgment on whether work of sufficient quality and quantity has been accomplished by comparing the reported percent complete against actual work accomplished. 38.4 Correspondence Copies of all written correspondence between the CONSULTANT and any party pertaining specifically to this contract shall be provided to the COUNTY for their records within one (1) week of the receipt or mailing of said correspondence. 38.5 Professional Endorsement The CONSULTANT shall have a Licensed Professional Engineer in the State of Florida sign and seal all reports, documents, Technical Special Provisions and Modified Special Provisions, and plans as required by FDOT and COUNTY standards. 38.6 Computer Automation The project will be developed utilizing Computer Aided Drafting and Design (CADD) systems. It is the responsibility of the CONSULTANT to meet the requirements in the FDOT CADD Manual. The CONSULTANT shall submit final documents and files as described therein. The CONSULTANT shall submit all required plan submittals (60%, 90% & 100%) in CADD format. 38.7 Coordination with Other Consultants The CONSULTANT is to coordinate his work with any and all adjacent and integral consultants so as to effect complete and homogenous plans and specifications for the project(s) described herein. 38.8 Optional Services At the COUNTY's option, the CONSULTANT may be requested to provide optional services. The fee for these services shall be negotiated in accordance with the terms detailed in Exhibit B, Method of Compensation, for a fair, competitive and reasonable cost, considering the scope and complexity of the project(s). Additional services may be authorized by Change Order or supplemental amendment in accordance with the County's Procurement Policy. The additional services may include other Services as required. RESPONSE FORMAT AND SCORING CRITERIA FOR DEVELOPMENT OF SHORTLIST: Proposals must be assembled, at minimum, in the order of the Evaluation Criteria listed or your proposal may be deemed non -responsive Evaluation Criteria Maximum Points 1. Ability of Professional Personnel 20 Points 2. Certified Minority Business Enterprise 5 Points 3. Past Performance 25 Points 4. Project Approach, Willingness to Meet Time and Budget Requirements 20 Points 5. Location 10 Points 6. Recent, Current, and Projected Workloads of the Firm 20 Points TOTAL POSSIBLE POINTS 100 Points For complete explanation of each evaluation criteria, please see the file titled "RPS Instructions" included with this advertisement. VENDOR CHECKLIST ***Vendor should check off each of the following items as the necessary action is completed (please see, Vendor Check List)**** REQUEST FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES (RPS) INSTRUCTIONS 1.1 The selection process will involve a two-step proposal review to minimize Proposers' costs in preparing initial qualification proposals and expediting the review process. The Proposers will initially submit a qualifications proposal which will be scored based on the Scoring Criteria for Development of Shortlist, which will be the basis for short -listing no less than three (3) firms. The Proposers will need to meet the minimum requirements outlined herein in order for their proposal to be evaluated and scored by the COUNTY. The COUNTY will then issue an invitation for oral presentations (Step 2) to at least the top three short-listed firms and produce a final ranking for approval by the Board of County Commissioners. Upon approval, the County will enter into negotiations with the top ranked firms to establish cost for the services needed. With successful negotiations, a contract will be developed with the selected firm, based on the negotiated price and technical components. The COUNTY plans to include an allowance in the contract for items such as changes in scope and permit acquisition. 1.2 The COUNTY will use a Selection Committee in the Request for Professional Services selection process. 1.3 The intent of the Step 1 scoring of the qualifications proposal is for consultants to indicate their interest, relevant experience, financial capability, staffing and organizational structure. 1.4 Based upon a review of these qualification proposals, the short-listed firms will be requested to submit Step 2, to make oral presentations. 1.5 The scores from the RPS - Step 1 used for short -listing for this Project will not be carried forward for the Step 2 of this selection process. 1.6 The intent of the Step 2 oral presentations is to provide the firms with a venue where they can conduct discussions with the Selection Committee to clarify questions and concerns before providing a final rank. 1.7 After review of the Step 2 oral presentations, the COUNTY will rank the Proposers based on the discussion and clarifying questions on their approach and related criteria, and then negotiate in good faith an Agreement with the top ranked Proposer. 1.8 If, in the sole judgment of the COUNTY, a contract cannot be successfully negotiated with the top -ranked firm, negotiations with that firm will be formally terminated and negotiations shall begin with the firm ranked second. If a contract cannot be successfully negotiated with the firm ranked second, negotiations with that firm will be formally terminated and negotiations shall begin with the third ranked firm, and so on. The COUNTY reserves the right to negotiate any element of the proposals in the best interest of the COUNTY. SCORING CRITERIA FOR DEVELOPMENT OF SHORTLIST: 1.9 For the development of a shortlist, this evaluation criteria will be utilized by the COUNTY'S Selection Committee to score each proposal. Consultants are encouraged to keep their proposals concise and to include a minimum of marketing materials. Proposals must address the following criteria: Evaluation Criteria Maximum Points 7. Ability of Professional Personnel 20 Points 8. Certified Minority Business Enterprise 5 Points 9. Past Performance 25 Points 10. Project Approach, Willingness to Meet Time and Budget Requirements 20 Points 11. Location 10 Points 12. Recent, Current, and Projected Workloads of the Firm 20 Points TOTAL POSSIBLE POINTS 100 Points Tie Breaker: In the event of a tie at final ranking, award shall be made to the proposer with the lower volume of work previously awarded. Volume of work shall be calculated based upon total dollars paid to the proposer in the twenty-four (24) months prior to the RFP submittal deadline. Payment information will be retrieved from the County's financial system of record. The tie breaking procedure is only applied in the final ranking step of the selection process and is invoked by the Procurement Services Division Director or designee. In the event a tie still exists, selection will be determined based on random selection by the Procurement Services Director before at least three (3) witnesses. Each criterion and methodology for scoring is further described below. EVALUATION CRITERIA NO. 1: ABILITY OF PROFESSIONAL PERSONNEL (20 Total Points Available) This criterion measures the ability of professional team personnel as shown by their level of experience on projects of similar type, size and complexity. This criterion measures how well the team is staffed to address all facets of the project. It measures how well the team is organized to deliver the project for the COUNTY. Preference will be given to teams with knowledge and experience with local construction and regulatory conditions and who demonstrate a strong commitment to team collaboration proximate to the project site. Preference will also be given to teams (both individual within the teams and the companies making up the team) that have worked together on successful delivery of similar projects. It measures the overall level of the team's qualifications to successfully complete the project. EVALUATION CRITERIA NO. 2: CERTIFIED MINORITY BUSINESS ENTERPRISE (5 Total Points Available) Submit certification with the Florida Department of Management Service, Office of Supplier Diversity as a Certified Minority Business Enterprise EVALUATION CRITERIA NO. 3: PAST PERFORMANCE (25 Total Points Available) This criterion measures the professional team's past experience with projects similar in size, type and complexity as this project. The professional team will be evaluated on past services provided for projects of similar size and scope of this project, including the experience the team members proposed on this project have together on the previous projects presented. Experience with all elements of the project scope as generally described herein will be evaluated, with specific emphasis on experience addressing the technical, community and project delivery categories. The professional team's minimization of change orders will be an important consideration. Preference will be given to similar services constructed within the last 5 years in proximity to the proposed project. The County requests that the vendor submits no fewer than three (3) and no more than ten (10) completed reference forms from clients whose projects are of a similar nature to this solicitation as a part of their proposal. Provide information on the projects completed by the Proposer that best represent projects of similar size, scope and complexity of this project using form provided in Form 5. Proposer may include two (2) additional pages for each project to illustrate aspects of the completed project that provides the PSC information to assess the experience of the Proposer on relevant project work. EVALUATION CRITERIA NO. 4: PROJECT APPROACH, WILLINGNESS TO MEET TIME AND BUDGET REOUIREMENTS (20 Total Points Available) Limited to 7 pages total Written overview of the professional team's resources available to complete the services requested in the schedule outlined in the scope of services. The Proposer should illustrate to the COUNTY how they propose to approach the project and assemble the resources to meet each phase and each major element of the project. (Limit response to 3 pages) A conceptual level schedule should be included as a separate page to illustrate concepts of design and permitting time, sequencing of the major elements. (Limit schedule to 1 page, I I" x 17" page size and 40 activities maximum) Written overview of professional team's concept and approach to managing the overall cost of the project (Limit response to 3 pages). Include in the 3-page response specific information on past project performance that demonstrates the Proposer's ability to meet owners' budgets including change order history on similar projects. EVALUATION CRITERIA NO. 5: LOCATION (10 Total Points Available) The professional team's approach to management and execution of work with respect to location of various key project team members will be evaluated under this criterion. The Proposer shall demonstrate from the project kick-off how they will establish the project location in order to manage day-to-day or on -site information collection and distribution between internal and external team members, and County staff, as well as other entities involved in the project. EVALUATION CRITERIA NO.6: RECENT, CURRENT, AND PROJECTED WORKLOADS OF THE FIRM (20 Total Points Available) This criterion measures the team's proposed resources for the project and their availability to complete all elements of this project with regards to the closeout of recent work, current workload, and projected projects that could impact the completion of this project. INSTRUCTIONS TO PROPOSERS Ad 2. QUESTIONS 2.1 Direct questions related to this Request for Professional Services (RPS) to the Collier County Procurement Services Division Online Bidding System website: https://www.bidsync.com/bidUnc-cas/. 2.2 Consultants/ProposersNendor/Firm must clearly understand that the only official answer or position of the County will be the one stated on the Collier County Procurement Services Division Online Bidding System website. For general questions, please call the referenced Procurement Strategist noted on the cover page. 3. PRE -PROPOSAL CONFERENCE (if applicable) 3.1 The purpose of the pre -proposal conference is to allow an open forum for discussion and questioning with County staff regarding the RPS with all prospective Consultants having an equal opportunity to hear and participate. Oral questions will receive oral responses, neither of which will be official, nor become part of the RPS. Only written responses to written questions will be considered official, and will be included as part of the RPS as an addendum. 3.2 All prospective Consultants are strongly encouraged to attend, as, this will usually be the only pre -proposal conference for this solicitation. If this pre -proposal conference is denoted as "mandatory", prospective Consultants must be present in order to submit a proposal response. 4. COMPLIANCE WITH THE RPS Proposals must be in strict compliance with this RPS. Failure to comply with all provisions of the RPS may result in disqualification. 5. AMBIGUITY, CONFLICT, OR OTHER ERRORS IN THE RPS It is the sole responsibility of the Consultant if the Consultant discovers any ambiguity, conflict, discrepancy, omission or other error in the RPS, to immediately notify the Procurement Strategist, noted herein, of such error in writing and request modification or clarification of the document prior to submitting the proposal. The Procurement Strategist will make modifications by issuing a written revision and will give written notice to all parties who have received this RPS from the Procurement Services Division. 6. ADDENDA The County reserves the right to formally amend and/or clarify the requirements of the solicitation where it deems necessary. Any such addendum/clarification shall be in writing and notifications shall be distributed electronically to all parties who received the original RPS prior to the deadline for submission of proposals. All changes to this RPS will be conveyed electronically through a notice of addendum or questions and answers to all Vendors registered under the applicable commodity code(s) at the time when the original RPS was released, as well as those Vendors who downloaded the RPS document. All addendums are posted on the Collier County Procurement Services Division Online Bidding System website: https://www.bidsync.com/bidsync-cas/. Before submitting a proposal, please make sure that you have read all documents provided, understood clearly and complied completely with any changes stated in the addenda as failure to do so may deeming your submittal non -responsive. 7. PROPOSALS, PRESENTATIONS, AND PROTEST COSTS The County will not be liable in any way for any costs incurred by any Consultant in the preparation of its proposal in response to this RPS, nor for the presentation of its proposal and/or participation in any discussions, negotiations, or, if applicable, any protest procedures. 8. DELIVERY OF PROPOSALS 8.1 All proposals are to be submitted by the due date and Naples local time, on the Collier County Procurement Services Division Online Bidding System website: https://www.bidsync.com/bidUnc-cas/. 8.2 The County does not bear the responsibility for proposals delivered to the Procurement Services Division past the stated date and/or time indicated. 9. VALIDITY OF PROPOSALS No proposal can be withdrawn after it is opened unless the Consultant makes their request in writing to the County. All proposals shall be valid for a period of one hundred eighty (180) days from the submission date to accommodate evaluation and selection process. 10. METHOD OF SOURCE SELECTION 10.1 The County is using the Competitive Sealed Proposals methodology of source selection for this procurement, as authorized by Ordinance Number 2017-08, as amended, establishing and adopting the Collier County Procurement Ordinance. 10.2 If the County receives proposals from less than three (3) firms, the Procurement Director shall review all the facts and determine if it is in the best interest of the County to solicit additional proposals or request that the Selection Committee rank order the received proposals. 11. EVALUATION OF PROPOSALS 11.1 Collier County will evaluate the proposals and select the firm in accordance with Florida Statute 287.055, Consultants' Competitive Negotiation Act (CCNA). 11.2 The County's procedure for selecting is as follows: 11.2.1 The Procurement Services Director shall appoint a selection committee to review all proposals submitted. 11.2.2 The Request for Professional Services is issued. 11.2.3 Subsequent to the receipt closing date for the proposals, the Procurement professional will review the proposals received and verify each proposal to determine if it minimally responds to the requirements of the published RPS. 11.2.4 Selection committee meetings will be open to the public and publicly noticed by the Procurement Services Division. 11.2.5 In an initial organization meeting, the selection committee members will receive instructions, the submitted proposals, and establish the next selection committee meeting date and time. After the first meeting, the Procurement professional will publicly announce all subsequent committee meeting dates and times. The subsequent meeting dates and times will be posted with at least seventy-two hours advanced notice. 11.2.6 Selection committee members will independently review and score each proposal based on the evaluation criteria stated in the Request for Professional Services using the Individual Selection Committee Score and Rank Form and prepare comments for discussion at the next meeting. The Individual Selection Committee Score and Rank Form is merely a tool to assist the selection committee member in their review of the proposals. 11.2.7 At the publicly noticed selection committee meeting, the members will present their independent findings / conclusions / comments based on their reading and interpretation of the materials presented to each other, and may ask questions of one another. Time will be allowed for public comment. 11.2.8 Collier County selection committee members may consider all the material submitted by the Proposer and other information Collier County may obtain to determine whether the Proposer is capable of and has a history of successfully completing projects of this type, including, without limitation, additional information Collier County may request, clarification of proposer information, and/or additional credit information. 11.2.9 Once the individual scoring has been completed, the Procurement professional will read the results publicly. The committee will make a determination on which firms will be invited to give oral presentations by short listing the proposals submitted with the goal of having a minimum of three (3) firms giving oral presentations. The selection committee may ask for additional information, present materials, interview, ask questions, etc. The members may consider any and all information obtained through this method in formulating their final ranking. 11.2.10 The selection committee's overall rank of firms in order of preference (from highest beginning with a rank of one (1) to the lowest) will be discussed and reviewed by the Procurement Professional. By having used all information presented (proposal, presentation, references, etc.), the selection committee members will create a final ranking and staff will subsequently enter into negotiations. 11.3 The County reserves the right to withdraw this RPS at any time and for any reason, and to issue such clarifications, modifications, addendums, and/or amendments as it may deem appropriate, including, but not limited, to requesting supplemental proposal information. 11.4 Receipt of a proposal by the County offers no rights upon the Consultant nor obligates the County in any manner. 11.5 Acceptance of the proposal does not guarantee issuance of any other governmental approvals. 12. The County reserves the right to contact any and all references submitted as a result of this solicitation. 13. RESERVED RIGHTS Collier County reserves the right in any solicitation to accept or reject any or all bids, proposals or offers; to waive minor irregularities and technicalities; or to request resubmission. Also, Collier County reserves the right to accept all or any part of any bid, proposal, or offer, and to increase or decrease quantities to meet additional or reduced requirements of Collier County. Collier County reserves the right to cancel, extend, or modify any or all bids, proposals or offers and to negotiate with any responsible providers to secure the best terms and conditions when it is deemed to be in the best of the County. County reserves its right to reject any sole response. 14. INSURANCE AND BONDING REQUIREMENTS 14.1The Vendor shall at its own expense, carry and maintain insurance coverage from responsible companies duly authorized to do business in the State of Florida as set forth in the Insurance and Bonding attachment of this solicitation. The Vendor shall be required to provide the Certificate of Insurance(s) with the limits set forth in the solicitation within five (5) days upon notification of selection for award. If the Vendor cannot provide the document within the referenced timeframe, the County reserves the right to award to another Vendor. The Vendor shall procure and maintain property insurance upon the entire project, if required, to the full insurable value of the scope of work. 14.2 The County and the Consultant waive against each other and the County's separate Consultants, Contractors, Design Consultant, Subcontractors agents and employees of each and all of them, all damages covered by property insurance provided herein, except such rights as they may have to the proceeds of such insurance. The Consultant and County shall, where appropriate, require similar waivers of subrogation from the County's separate Consultants, Design Consultants and Subcontractors and shall require each of them to include similar waivers in their contracts. 14.3 Collier County shall be responsible for purchasing and maintaining, its own liability insurance. 14.4 Certificates issued as a result of the award of this solicitation must identify "For any and all work performed on behalf of Collier County." 14.5 The General Liability Policy provided by Consultant to meet the requirements of this solicitation shall name Collier County, Florida, as an additional insured as to the operations of Consultant under this solicitation and shall contain a severability of interests provisions. 14.6 Collier County Board of County Commissioners shall be named as the Certificate Holder. The Certificates of Insurance must state the Contract Number, or Project Number, or specific Project description, or must read: For any and all work performed on behalf of Collier County. The "Certificate Holder" should read as follows: Collier County Board of County Commissioners Naples, Florida 14.7 The amounts and types of insurance coverage shall conform to the minimum requirements set forth in Insurance and Bonding attachment, with the use of Insurance Services Office (ISO) forms and endorsements or their equivalents. If Consultant has any self -insured retentions or deductibles under any of the below listed minimum required coverage, Consultant must identify on the Certificate of Insurance the nature and amount of such self- insured retentions or deductibles and provide satisfactory evidence of financial responsibility for such obligations. All self -insured retentions or deductibles will be Consultant's sole responsibility. 14.8 Coverage(s) shall be maintained without interruption from the date of commencement of the Work until the date of completion and acceptance of the scope of work by the County or as specified in this solicitation, whichever is longer. 14.9 The Consultant and/or its insurance carrier shall provide 30 days written notice to the County of policy cancellation or non - renewal on the part of the insurance carrier or the Consultant. The Consultant shall also notify the County, in a like manner, within twenty-four (24) hours after receipt, of any notices of expiration, cancellation, non -renewal or material change in coverage or limits received by Consultant from its insurer and nothing contained herein shall relieve Consultant of this requirement to provide notice. In the event of a reduction in the aggregate limit of any policy to be provided by Consultant hereunder, Consultant shall immediately take steps to have the aggregate limit reinstated to the full extent permitted under such policy. 14.10 Should at any time the Consultant not maintain the insurance coverage(s) required herein, the County may terminate the Agreement or at its sole discretion shall be authorized to purchase such coverage(s) and charge the Consultant for such coverage(s) purchased. If Consultant fails to reimburse the County for such costs within thirty (30) days after demand, the County has the right to offset these costs from any amount due Consultant under this Agreement or any other agreement between the County and Consultant. The County shall be under no obligation to purchase such insurance, nor shall it be responsible for the coverage(s) purchased or the insurance company or companies used. The decision of the County to purchase such insurance coverage(s) shall in no way be construed to be a waiver of any of its rights under the Contract Documents. 14.11 If the initial or any subsequently issued Certificate of Insurance expires prior to the completion of the scope of work, the Consultant shall furnish to the County renewal or replacement Certificate(s) of Insurance not later than ten (10) calendar days after the expiration date on the certificate. Failure of the Consultant to provide the County with such renewal certificate(s) shall be considered justification for the County to terminate any and all contracts. 15. ADDITIONAL ITEMS AND/OR SERVICES Additional items and / or services may be added to the resultant contract, or purchase order, in compliance with the Procurement Ordinance. 16. COUNTY'S RIGHT TO INSPECT The County or its authorized Agent shall have the right to inspect the Consultant's facilities/project site during and after each work assignment the Consultant is performing. 17. VENDOR PERFORMANCE EVALUATION The County has implemented a Vendor Performance Evaluation System for all contracts awarded in excess of $25,000. To this end, vendors will be evaluated on their performance upon completion/termination of this Agreement. The County reserves the right to take into consideration a vendor's past performance under a prior or current County contract when it is considering the granting of a new contract, the assignment of a work order, or any additional work. Past poor performance may result in the County deeming the vendor non -responsible and therefore refraining from awarding such work. 18. ADDITIONAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF CONTRACT 18.1 The selected Consultant shall be required to sign a standard Collier County contractor accept the County's Purchase Order terms and conditions to serve as a formal contact. 18.2. The resultant contract(s) may include purchase or work orders issued by the County's Project Manager (a/k/a Contract Administrative Agent). 18.3 The County reserves the right to include in any contract document such terms and conditions, as it deems necessary for the proper protection of the rights of Collier County. A sample copy of this contract is available upon request. The County will not be obligated to sign any contracts, maintenance and/or service agreements other documents or agree to any exceptions to the County's terms and conditions provided by the Consultant. 18.4 The County's Project Manager shall coordinate with the Vendor / Contractor the return of any surplus assets, including materials, supplies, and equipment associated with the scope or work. 19. PUBLIC RECORDS COMPLIANCE 19.1 Florida Public Records Law Chapter 119, including specifically those contractual requirements in 119.0701(2)(a)-(b) as follows: IF THE CONTRACTOR HAS QUESTIONS REGARDING THE APPLICATION OF CHAPTER 119, FLORIDA STATUTES, TO THE CONTRACTOR'S DUTY TO PROVIDE PUBLIC RECORDS RELATING TO THIS CONTRACT, CONTACT THE CUSTODIAN OF PUBLIC RECORDS AT: Communication and Customer Relations Division 3299 Tamiami Trail East Suite 102 Naples, FL 34112-5746 Telephone: (239) 252-8999 19.2 The Contractor must specifically comply with the Florida Public Records Law to: 19.2.1 Keep and maintain public records required by the public agency to perform the service. 19.2.2 Upon request from the public agency's custodian of public records, provide the public agency with a copy of the requested records or allow the records to be inspected or copied within a reasonable time at a cost that does not exceed the cost provided in this chapter or as otherwise provided by law. 19.2.3 Ensure that public records that are exempt or confidential and exempt from public records disclosure requirements are not disclosed except as authorized by law for the duration of the contract term and following completion of the contract if the Contractor does not transfer the records to the public agency. 19.2.4 Upon completion of the contract, transfer, at no cost, to the public agency all public records in possession of the Contractor or keep and maintain public records required by the public agency to perform the service. If the Contractor transfers all public records to the public agency upon completion of the contract, the Contractor shall destroy any duplicate public records that are exempt or confidential and exempt from public records disclosure requirements. If the Contractor keeps and maintains public records upon completion of the contract, the Contractor shall meet all applicable requirements for retaining public records. All records stored electronically must be provided to the public agency, upon request from the public agency's custodian of public records, in a format that is compatible with the information technology systems of the public agency. 20. WORK ORDERS ON FIXED TERM CONTRACTS 20.1 The County reserves the right to order such services from selected firms as may be required during said period, but does not guarantee any minimum or maximum services to be ordered during the period specified from any given firm. Work Order service assignments shall be at the sole discretion of the County. 20.2 Work issued that is determined to be against a "CONTINUING CONTRACTS" shall not exceed $200,000 or the maximum sum allowable by law under Florida's Consultants' Competitive Negotiation Act, Section 287.055, Florida Statutes, as amended, whichever is greater, and agreed upon by the parties. 20.3 Should any project that is active on a work order extend past the contract termination date, that work order will be active and extended as necessary until completion of such project. 21. PAYMENT METHOD 21.1 Payments are made in accordance with the Local Government Prompt Payment Act, Chapter 218, Florida Statutes. Vendor's invoices must include: 21.1.1 Purchase Order Number 21.1.2 Description and quantities of the goods or services provided per instructions on the County's purchase order or contract. Invoices shall be sent to: Board of County Commissioners Clerk's Finance Department ATTN: Accounts Payable 3299 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 700 Naples FL 34112 Or Emailed to: bccagclerk(u)collierclerk.com 21.2 Payments will be made for articles and/or services furnished, delivered, and accepted, upon receipt and approval of invoices submitted on the date of services or within six (6) months after completion of contract. Any untimely submission of invoices beyond the specified deadline period is subject to non-payment under the legal doctrine of "laches" as untimely submitted. Time shall be deemed of the essence with respect to the timely submission of invoices under this agreement. 21.3 In instances where the successful contractor may owe debts (including, but not limited to taxes or other fees) to Collier County and the contractor has not satisfied nor made arrangement to satisfy these debts, the County reserves the right to off- set the amount owed to the County by applying the amount owed to the vendor or contractor for services performed of for materials delivered in association with a contract. 21.4 Invoices shall not reflect sales tax. After review and approval, the invoice will be transmitted to the Finance Division for payment. Payment will be made upon receipt of proper invoice and in compliance with Chapter 218 Florida Statutes, otherwise known as the "Local Government Prompt Payment Act." Collier County reserves the right to withhold and/or reduce an appropriate amount of any payment for work not performed or for unsatisfactory performance of Contractual requirements. 22. ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH AND SAFETY 22.1 All Consultants and Sub Consultants performing service for Collier County are required and shall comply with all Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), State and County Safety and Occupational Health Standards and any other applicable rules and regulations. Consultants and Sub Consultants shall be responsible for the safety of their employees and any unsafe acts or conditions that may cause injury or damage to any persons or property within and around the work site. All firewall penetrations must be protected in order to meet Fire Codes. 22.2 Collier County Government has authorized OSHA representatives to enter any Collier County facility, property and/or right-of-way for the purpose of inspection of any Consultant's work operations. This provision is non-negotiable by any department and/or Consultant. 22.3 All new electrical installations shall incorporate NFPA 70E Short Circuit Protective Device Coordination and Arc Flash Studies where relevant as determined by the engineer. 22.4 All electrical installations shall be labeled with appropriate NFPA 70E arch flash boundary and PPE Protective labels. 23. POLLUTION PREVENTION The vendor is required to implement industry relevant pollution prevention and best managcmcnt practices. Should pollution incidents occur, Collier County Pollution Control must be notified immediately. 24. LICENSES 24.1 The Consultant is required to possess the correct Business Tax Receipt, professional license, and any other authorizations necessary to carry out and perform the work required by the project pursuant to all applicable Federal, State and Local Law, Statute, Ordinances, and rules and regulations of any kind. Additionally, copies of the required licenses must be submitted with the proposal response indicating that the entity proposing, as well as the team assigned to the County account, is properly licensed to perform the activities or work included in the contract documents. Failure on the part of any Consultant to submit the required documentation may be grounds to DEEM VENDOR NON -RESPONSIVE. A Consultant, with an office within Collier County is also required to have an occupational license. 24.2 All State Certified contractors who may need to pull Collier County permits or call in inspections must complete a Collier County Contractor License registration form and submit the required fee. After registering the license/registration will need to be renewed thereafter to remain "active" in Collier County. 24.3 If you have questions regarding professional licenses contact the Contractor Licensing, Community Development and Environmental Services at (239) 252-2431, 252-2432 or 252-2909. Questions regarding required occupational licenses, please contact the Tax Collector's Office at (239) 252-2477. 25. SURVIVABILITY The Vendor agrees that any Purchase Order/Work Order/Solicitation Documents that extends beyond the expiration date of the original Solicitation will survive and remain subject to the terms and conditions of that Agreement until the completion or termination. 26. PRINCIPAL/COLLUSION By submission of this Proposal the undersigned, as Consultant, does declare that the only person or persons interested in this Proposal as principal or principals is/are named therein and that no person other than therein mentioned has any interest in this Proposal or in the contract to be entered into; that this Proposal is made without connection with any person, company or parties making a Proposal, and that it is in all respects fair and in good faith without collusion or fraud. 27. RELATION OF COUNTY It is the intent of the parties hereto that the Consultant shall be legally considered an independent Consultant, and that neither the Consultant nor their employees shall, under any circumstances, be considered employees or agents of the County, and that the County shall be at no time legally responsible for any negligence on the part of said Consultant, their employees or agents, resulting in either bodily or personal injury or property damage to any individual, firm, or corporation. 28. TERMINATION Should the Consultant be found to have failed to perform services in a manner satisfactory to the County, the County may terminate this Agreement immediately for cause; further the County may terminate this Agreement for convenience with a thirty (30) day written notice. The County shall be sole judge of non-performance. In the event that the award of this solicitation is made by the Procurement Services Director, the award and any resultant purchase orders may be terminated at any time by the County upon thirty (30) days written notice to the awarded vendor(s) pursuant to the Board's Procurement Ordinance. 29. LOBBYING After the issuance of any solicitation, no current or prospective vendor or any person acting on their behalf, shall contact, communicate with or discuss any matter relating to the solicitation with any Collier County employee or elected or appointed official, other than the Procurement Services Director or his/her designees. This prohibition ends upon execution of the final contract or upon cancellation of the solicitation. Any current or prospective vendor that lobbies any Collier County employee or elected or appointed official while a solicitation is open or being recommended for award (i) may be deemed ineligible for award of that solicitation by the Procurement Services Director, and (ii) will be subject to Suspension and Debarment outlined in section Twenty -Eight of County Procurement Ordinance 2017-08, as amended. 30. CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORITY TO CONDUCT BUSINESS IN THE STATE OF FLORIDA (FI Statute 607.1501) In order to be considered for award, firms must be registered with the Florida Department of State Divisions of Corporations in accordance with the requirements of Florida Statute 607.1501 and provide a certificate of authority (www.sunbiz.org/search.httnl) prior to execution of a contract. A copy of the document should be submitted with the solicitation response and the document number should be identified. Firms who do not provide the certificate of authority at the time of response shall be required to provide same within five (5) days upon notification of selection for award. If the firm cannot provide the document within the referenced timeframe, the County reserves the right to award to another firm. 31. SINGLE PROPOSAL Each Consultant must submit, with their proposal, the required forms included in this RPS. Only one proposal from a legal entity as a primary will be considered. A legal entity that submits a proposal as a primary or as part of a partnership or joint venture submitting as primary may not then act as a sub -consultant to any other firm submitting under the same RPS. If a legal entity is not submitting as a primary or as part of a partnership or joint venture as a primary, that legal entity may act as a sub -consultant to any other firm or firms submitting under the same RPS. All submittals in violation of this requirement will be deemed non- responsive and rejected from further consideration. 32. PROTEST PROCEDURES 32.1 Any Vendor who alleges to be aggrieved in connection with the solicitation or award of a contract, may protest to the Procurement Services Director, who shall serve as the sole receipt of the any and all notices of intent to protest and all formal protests. 32.2With respect to a protest of the terms, conditions and specifications contained in a solicitation, including any provisions governing the methods for evaluation of bids, proposals or replies, awarding contracts, reserving rights for further negotiation or modifying or amending any contract, the protesting party shall file a notice of intent to protest within three (3) days, excluding weekends and County holidays, after the first publication, whether by posting or formal advertisement of the solicitation. The formal written protest shall be filed within five (5) days of the date the notice of intent is filed. Formal protests of the terms, conditions and specifications shall contain all of the information required for the Procurement Services Director, to render a decision on the formal protest and determine whether postponement of the bid opening or proposal/response closing time is appropriate. The Procurement Services Director's decision shall be considered final and conclusive unless the protesting party files an appeal of the Procurement Services Director's decision. 32.3Any actual proposer or respondent to who desires to protest a recommended contract award shall submit a notice of intent to protest to the Procurement Services Director within three (3) calendar days, excluding weekends and County holidays, from the date of the initial posting of the recommended award. 32.4A11 formal protests with respect to a recommended contract award shall be submitted in writing to the Procurement Services Director for a decision. Said protests shall be submitted within five (5) calendar days, excluding weekends and County holidays, from the date that the notice of intent to protest is received by the Procurement Services Director, and accompanied by the required fee. 32.5Complete instructions for formal protest are set forth in Section 23 of Collier County Procurement Ordinance 2017-08, as amended. The protesting party must have standing as defined by established Florida case law to maintain a protest. 33. PUBLIC ENTITY CRIME A person or affiliate who has been placed on the convicted Consultant list following a conviction for a public entity crime may not submit a bid, proposal, or reply on a contract to provide any goods or services to a public entity; may not submit a bid, proposal, or reply on a contract with a public entity for the construction or repair of a public building or public work; may not submit bids, proposals, or replies on leases of real property to a public entity; may not be awarded or perform work as a contractor, supplier, subcontractor, or consultant under a contract with any public entity; and may not transact business with any public entity in excess of the threshold amount provided in s. 287.017 for CATEGORY TWO for a period of 36 months following the date of being placed on the convicted Consultant list. 34. SECURITY AND BACKGROUND CHECKS 34.1 The Contractor is required to comply with County Ordinance 2004-52, as amended. Background checks are valid for five (5) years and the Contractor shall be responsible for all associated costs. If required, Contractor shall be responsible for the costs of providing background checks by the Collier County Facilities Management Division for all employees that shall provide services to the County under this Agreement. This may include, but not be limited to, checking federal, state and local law enforcement records, including a state and FBI fingerprint check, credit reports, education, residence and employment verifications and other related records. Contractor shall be required to maintain records on each employee and make them available to the County for at least four (4) years. 34.2 All of Contractor's employees and subcontractors must wear Collier County Government Identification badges at all times while performing services on County facilities and properties. Contractor ID badges are valid for one (1) year from the date of issuance and can be renewed each year at no cost to the Contractor during the time period in which their background check is valid, as discussed below. All technicians shall have on their shirts the name of the contractor's business. 34.3 The Contractor shall immediately notify the Collier County Facilities Management Division via e-mail (DL- FMOPS@colliergov.net) whenever an employee assigned to Collier County separates from their employment. This notification is critical to ensure the continued security of Collier County facilities and systems. Failure to notify within four (4) hours of separation may result in a deduction of $500 per incident. 34.4 CCSO requires separate fingerprinting prior to work being performed in any of their locations. This will be coordinated upon award of the contract. If there are additional fees for this process, the vendor is responsible for all costs. 35. CONFLICT OF INTEREST Consultant shall complete the Conflict of Interest Affidavit. Disclosure of any potential or actual conflict of interest is subject to County staff review and does not in and of itself disqualify a firm from consideration. These disclosures are intended to identify and or preclude conflict of interest situations during contract selection and execution. 36. PROHIBITION OF GIFTS TO COUNTY EMPLOYEES No organization or individual shall offer or give, either directly or indirectly, any favor, gift, loan, fee, service or other item of value to any County employee, as set forth in Chapter 112, Part III, Florida Statutes, the current Collier County Ethics Ordinance and County Administrative Procedure 5311. Violation of this provision may result in one or more of the following consequences: a. Prohibition by the individual, firm, and/or any employee of the firm from contact with County staff for a specified period of time; b. Prohibition by the individual and/or firm from doing business with the County for a specified period of time, including but not limited to: submitting bids, RPS, and/or quotes; and, c. immediate termination of any contract held by the individual and/or firm for cause. 37. IMMIGRATION LAW AFFIDAVIT CERTIFICATION 37.1 Statutes and executive orders require employers to abide by the immigration laws of the United States and to employ only individuals who are eligible to work in the United States. 37.2 The Employment Eligibility Verification System (E-Verify) operated by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) in partnership with the Social Security Administration (SSA), provides an Internet -based means of verifying employment eligibility of workers in the United States; it is not a substitute for any other employment eligibility verification requirements. The program will be used for Collier County formal Invitations to Bid (ITB) and Request for Proposals (RFP) including Request for Professional Services (RPS) and construction services. 37.3 Exceptions to the program: 37.3.1 Commodity based procurement where no services are provided. 37.3.2 Where the requirement for the affidavit is waived by the Board of County Commissioners 37.4 Vendors are required to be enrolled in the E-Verify program at the time of submission of the bid. Acceptable evidence of your enrollment consists of a copy of the properly completed E-Verify Company Profile page or a copy of the fully executed E-Verify Memorandum of Understanding for the company which will be produced at the time of the submission of the Vendor's proposal/bid or within five (5) day of the County's Notice of Recommend Award. FAILURE TO EXECUTE THIS AFFIDAVIT CERTIFICATION AND SUBMIT WITH VENDOR'S PROPOSAL/BID MAY DEEM THE VENDOR'S AS NON -RESPONSIVE. 37.5Additionally, Consultants shall require all subcontracted Consultants to use the E-Verify system for all purchases not covered under the "Exceptions to the program" clause above. All vendors shall familiarize themselves with the statutory requirements set fort in the Florida Statutes §448.095 pertaining to the responsibilities of Public Employers, Contractors and Subcontractors. 37.6 For additional information regarding the Employment Eligibility Verification System (E-Verify) program visit the following website: http://www.dhs.gov/E-Verify. It shall be the Consultant's responsibility to familiarize themselves with all rules and regulations governing this program. 37.7 Consultant acknowledges, and without exception or stipulation, any firm(s) receiving an award shall be fully responsible for complying with the provisions of the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 as located at 8 U.S.C. 1324, et seq. and regulations relating thereto, as either may be amended and with the provisions contained within this affidavit. Failure by the awarded firm(s) to comply with the laws referenced herein or the provisions of this affidavit shall constitute a breach of the award agreement and the County shall have the discretion to unilaterally terminate said agreement immediately. Certification: The Vendor hereby agrees to comply with the instructions above, by submission of a bid/proposal. IMMOKALEE ROAD AT RANDALL BOULEVARD INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA SOLICITATION 21-7901 FINTBCorporatlon 201 N Franklin St The HNTB Companies Suite1200 Infrastructure Solutions Tampa, FL 33602 Telephone (813) 402-4150 hntb.com Ms. Viviana Giarimoustas Procurement Strategist Collier County Procurement Services 3295 E. Tamiami Trail Building C2 Naples, FL 34112 HNTB Re: Solicitation Number:21-7901, Solicitation Title: Immokalee Road At Randall Boulevard Intersection Improvements June 14, 2021 Dear Ms. Giarimoustas and Selection Committee Members: As Collier County faces increasing demands on its transportation infrastructure, HNTB Corporation (HNTB) stands ready to lead the design of the proposed improvements at the intersection of Immokalee Road and Randall Boulevard. We have assembled a team that embodies technical excellence, holds meaningful stakeholder relationships and boasts a proven history of delivering projects for you. Ed Ponce, PE, leads our team as Project Manager with the support of Julian Gutierrez, PE, as Deputy Project Manager. Our team is enhanced by Agnoli Barber & Brundage, Archaeological Consultants (a woman -owned business), Ardaman & Associates and Element Engineering Group (a disadvantaged business enterprise and minority business enterprise). HNTB Team members have served Collier County on projects such as Eleven Bridge Replacements Design, the Golden Gate Estates PD&E Study and Vanderbilt Drive Bridge Replacements. We will couple our experience with our vast skill set and resources teamwide to meet or exceed your expectations in successfully delivering this project's proposed improvements. We are thrilled for this opportunity to submit our qualifications for this exciting project and we look forward to helping enhance Collier County's transportation facilities for current travelers and future generations. Please contact me at (813) 498-5162 or email Iebecker@hntb.com if you have any questions regarding our submittal. Best regards, � �_ �, �.i 5 �1 Leonard C. Becker Senior Vice President/Principal-in-Charge Collier County Government I Solicitation 21-7901 The dramatic population growth in Collier County continues to place increasing demands on the existing transportation network. As development activity occurs throughout the county, facilities such as Randall Boulevard and Immokalee Road continue to play an integral part in the efficient and safe mobility of residents, visitors, and commerce. The HNTB team was assembled to efficiently deliver the County's two -phased approach for the improvement of the Randall Blvd.11mmokalee Rd. intersection to relieve immediate congestion needs and position for the future ultimate configuration. To address your vision for success on this project we have built a team that is technically excellent for project innovation; offers strong stakeholder relationships to efficiently deliver final construction plans; and brings a proven history of delivering for you as most recently exemplified on our Eleven Bridge Replacements Design (Project Number 66066.12). This recent relevant project highlights similar skills required on this project such as structural design, roadway design, and maintenance -of -traffic (MOT) coupled with efficient and effective project management. Our team is led by our Project Manager, Ed Ponce, PE. Ed is supported by Deputy Project Manager, Julian Gutierrez, PE. Together they bring extensive Collier County and Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) experience that will be critical to the success of this project. PROJECT MANAGEMENT TEAM ED PONCE, PE Project Manager Ed Ponce, PE brings 25 years of project management and design experience to serve Collier County. His previous experience with the FDOT, serving as a Senior Design Engineer, District Permitting Engineer and culminating as the District Roadway Design Engineer, brings technical design excellence to you. With many of his FDOT design projects being located within Collier County, Ed brings decades of local stakeholder relationships for efficient project coordination, which will be critical to deliver on time and on budget. He is committed to providing innovative and cost-effective solutions to address capacity concerns at this vital intersection. Ed is passionate about designing transportation improvements for all users. His technical expertise is further demonstrated by him helping co-author FDOT design criteria for the FDOT Design Manual (FDM) and serving on the statewide Complete Streets Task Force. His approach to project management not only focuses on maintaining the budget of the design 100 portion, but the project as a whole. He recognizes the significance of right-of-way impacts having served as an Expert Witness for eminent domain acquisitions for FDOT. This also uniquely qualifies him to analyze right-of-way impacts to avoid excessive costs, which we have heard from you are a particular concern for the parcels along Randall Blvd. associated with the Emergent Development Group. Additionally, Ed works closely with our design staff to produce 3D renderings of the roadway and structures designs to help convey complex designs in easy to iih, understand araohics. JULIAN GUTIERREZ, PE Deputy Project Manager Our Deputy PM, Julian Gutierrez, PE, brings a proven history of successful project delivery for Collier County, having served as PM for the Eleven Bridge Replacements project. His history with multi -discipline and multi -agency collaboration and coordination garnered a perfect rating of "10" for performance by the County on the Eleven Bridge Replacements design. His dedication to serving the County's needs is matched with more than 30 years of structural engineering expertise. Julian also brings a unique understanding of project challenges and innovation opportunities, having worked with the County on the Vanderbilt Drive Bridge Replacements, 1-75 Widening from North of SR 951 to North of Golden Gate Parkway and the 1-75 Multimodal Master Plan. This dedication to innovation has helped identify significant proposed cost savings for the ultimate Phase II structures concept on this project for your consideration. As Deputy PM, Julian will be assisting Ed on daily staff assignments, performance monitoring and providing oversight and guidance for the ultimate bridge improvement. HNTB Collier County Government I Solicitation 21-7901 ADDITIONAL KEY PERSONNEL DEDICATED TO THIS PROJECT JOHN DEWEY, PE Roadway Design and Maintenance of Traffic (MOT) Lead John is a project manager and roadway engineer with 23 years of experience working on design submittals, quality control, project scheduling, leadership briefings, and developing cost estimates. He brings technical expertise in all facets of design delivery including the critical components of roadway geometrics and maintenance of traffic plans. John brings experience delivering numerous final design plans covering a wide range of projects from resurfacing projects to urban/suburban widening and reconstruction throughout Florida. His experience will be instrumental in producing quality deliverables that exceed the County's expectations. SADIE DALTON, PE Structures Lead Sadie has a proven history with Collier County, having served as the Deputy Project Manager for the Eleven Bridge Replacements design and structures lead on the Golden Gate Estates PD&E. Sadie will serve as the lead structural engineer on this project and is technically excellent in the design of prestressed concrete bridges, overhead sign structures, and mast arms. Her commitment to producing quality deliverables is proven by the two years she previously „ served as the HNTB West Florida Office Quality Manager. KEN JACOBS, TSOS, RSP TSM&O and ITS Lead As Transportation Systems Management and Operations (TSM&O) group director, Ken brings a successful, 35-year track record of advancements in the transportation field developing strong intergovernmental relationships and driving business and technology change initiatives. As the former Transportation Director for Pinellas County with a special emphasis in arterial ITS systems, Ken offers an abundance of concentrated experience directing all phases of TSM&O work activities including project planning, programming, design, construction, operations and maintenance functions. GOVARDHAN MUTHYALAGARI, PE, PTOE Traffic Modeling Lead Govardhan brings 20 years of experience completing traffic engineering and modeling analysis, including arterial and intersection operations, safety studies, signal warrant and signal retiming studies. Govardhan is proficient in transportation and traffic modeling software applications and has hands-on experience with the Collier County regional model. Govardhan's proven history in delivering similar projects focuses on maximizing existing infrastructure operations both within the project limits and those at adjacent intersections. MICHELLE RUTISHAUSER Environmental Science Lead Michelle will oversee environmental and associated National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) re-evaluation efforts. She is a senior scientist with 16 years of experience preparing and managing environmental documents and re- evaluations. Additionally, Michelle's expertise includes Environmental Resource Permit (ERP) and Section 404 permitting, threatened and endangered species surveys, Section 7 consultations, Section 4(f) coordination, and ecological assessments including geographic information system (GIS) analysis for habitat mapping, spatial editing and analysis and aerial photo interpretation. Michelle brings important relationships with the FDOT Environmental Management Office, having served for eight years as in-house staff managing NEPA approval and re-evaluation efforts. 2iLCHRIS KUZLO, PE Drainage Lead Chris brings 11 years of experience in design and plans production for numerous drainage designs throughout Florida. As a former Southwest Florida Water Management District (SWFWMD) employee, Chris is uniquely qualified to develop drainage concepts that can quickly meet regulatory approval. He has a thorough knowledge of state and county manuals and guidelines and is driven by technical excellence, having performed design and quality reviews of all drainage components and modeling for SWFWMD and FDOT. CHRISTINE DIAZ Public Involvement Lead Christine brings 23 years of extensive experience running public engagement programs for multiple agencies. Her specialties include cultivating community partnerships, client relationships, and the implementation of award -winning A projects. She has established strong and valuable relationships working throughout Collier County on multiple HNTB Collier County Government I Solicitation 21-7901 DAVID HUBBARD, PE Senior Roadway Designer David brings ten years of experience in a multitude of engineering and design management tasks. David is knowledgeable and technically excellent in project development, utility relocation and conflict resolution, and c innovative intersection designs. David is experienced in delivering all facets of project plan components. Most recently he delivered Tampa's first parking -protected buffered bike lane design utilizing Complete Street concepts along portions of Brorein Street, Tampa Street and Florida Avenue. This safety -driven design focus for all users will be critical when developing the final design for both phases of this project. JORGE UY, PE, PTOE, RSP1 TSM&OIITS Jorge is a project engineer specializing in pavement management and safety improvements. He has 10 years of m experience having managed data collection, performed pavement analysis and overseen resurfacing projects resulting in a proven history in delivering effective solutions. Jorge's experience offers a responsive, efficient and streamlined 'all = approach to project design requirements and provides innovative design and pavement solutions to meet Collier Count 's needs. HNTB TEAM MEMBER FIRMS HNTB has 100 highly experienced and trusted engineers, planners and scientists that have delivered numerous PD&E and final design projects throughout the state from our West Florida offices. To provide specialty tasks, HNTB will be supported by subconsultants who have successful experience partnering with HNTB and the County to provide high -quality work and grow your DBE M/WBE program: Agnoli Barber & Brundage (ABB), Inc. is a locally owned and operated company and has provided all s�g5'' &5V GNOLI levels of design survey services in Southwest Florida for over 38 ears. ABB's partnership with HNTB 9 Y Y P p 1 %%% '• LS�s '°ARBER & z has most recently been exhibited as a part of the Eleven Bridge Replacements design. Their attention to t6%16% s� -` 'BRUNDAGE, INC. quality and schedule adherence allowed HNTB to receive a perfect "10" performance review from Collier 13mfess.onA Fnginc rs, MaM , Sv yocs County for all facets of the project. & T. dscape Ard,iwa, ABB's Relevant Collier County Experience: • Pelican Bay Sidewalk Improvements Design • Rushton Point Turn Lane • Estero Parkway • SR 78 Improvements • Six Mile Cypress Parkway and Metro Parkway Intersection 0 ACI's Relevant Collier County Experience: • Immokalee Road (CR 846) at Randall Road Blvd Intersection PD&E Study • SR 82 (Immokalee Road) from the Lee County Line to the Collier County Line • SR 82 (Immokalee Road) from Lee Boulevard/CR 844 to East of Shawnee Road • PD&E Study of Golden Gate Estates with three bridges at 8th Street NE, 16th Street NE, and 47th Avenue NE ABB's survey project team has the knowledge and technical expertise of all applicable local ordinances, understanding of Southwest Florida construction guidelines, land development codes and contractor's license issues. ABB's surveying team is prequalified in FDOT Work Groups 8.1, 8.2 and 8.4. All of their field surveyors are cross -trained, allowing them maximum flexibility in job assignments. Field technicians are equipped with wireless technology and can report to the ABB project manager daily which provides superior coordination opportunities, data accuracy, and schedule adherence. This daily attention to project needs provides the most stringent quality control possible. Archaeological Consultants, Inc. (ACI), Florida's oldest full -service cultural resource management (CRM) company, is a woman -owned business. ACI is certified by the FDOT as a Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) and by the State of Florida as a Minority Business Enterprise (MBE). The firm's experienced staff of archaeologists, architectural historians, GIS specialists, and technicians have the education, specialized training, and technical skills to provide cultural resource assessment surveys, NRHP nominations, case studies, Memoranda of Agreement, 4(f) evaluations, resource mitigation, and other CRM services. For more than two decades, ACI has worked with HNTB personnel completing numerous projects together. The firm's leaders bring unparalleled relationships having served as board members and officers for the: American Cultural Resource Association (ACRA), National Trust for Historic Preservation (NRHP), Society of Professional Archaeologists (SOPA/RPA), and with state organizations, including the Florida Public Archaeology Network, Florida Archaeological Council, and the Florida Anthropological Society (FAS), as well as the Florida Trust for Historic Preservation (FTHP), and the Florida Historical Commission (FHC). NNTB Collier County Government I Solicitation 21-7901 Ardaman & Associates, Inc. Ardaman's Relevant Collier County Experience: • Collier Boulevard (CR 951) • Gator Canal Bridge • Vanderbilt Beach Road Extension • Alligator Alley Collier County Toll Plaza • North Collier Boulevard from Jolley Bridge to San Marco Road (Phase II) ELEMENT ENGINEERING GROUP Element's Relevant Collier County Experience: • US 41 from CR 951 to Greenway Road • SR 82 (Immokalee Road) from Alabama Road to Homestead Road • SR 29 from Everglades Airpark to NE Broadway (Everglades City) • SR 90 (US 41) at Oasis Visitor Center Ardaman & Associates, Inc. offers a broad range of professional engineering services and, like ABB, has most recently been a part of the HNTB team for the Eleven Bridge Replacements Design for Collier County. This continuity of key team members from the Eleven Bridges Replacements Design demonstrates the continuity of successful historical relationships to deliver this project to you. Ardaman looks to continue their stellar support on the HNTB team for you on this project by performing geotechnical engineering and soil/groundwater contamination assessmentslremediation, including hazardous waste evaluations. Their transportation engineering staff is especially knowledgeable and experienced with current FDOT and Collier County design standards and methodologies. Their extensive technical experience, superior resources and advanced capabilities allow Ardaman to provide the most cost-effective solutions to the variety of challenges that can face transportation projects. Accuracy of information and the ability to innovate are of utmost importance to successfully complete this project and Ardaman has a proven history of delivering high -quality work. Their laboratories are staffed by FDOT certified CTQP technicians and are inspected and certified annually by the Construction Materials Engineering Council (CMEC) and by the FDOT. Element Engineering Group, LLC (ELEMENT) is an award -winning, certified DBE and MBE consulting firm that has served public sector engineering needs since 2006. Element will be engaged in subsurface utility engineering and utility coordination on this project. Element brings decades of experience not only working together with HNTB, but specifically as a team with individuals such as Brent Postma for utilities and Pete Mattson, PSM for SUE with our project leadership team, including Ed Ponce, PE. and Julian Gutierrez, PE. These strong historical relationships foster improved project communication and coordination for successful project delivery. Their dedicated staff of professionals offers a wealth of knowledge and expertise to create innovative proactive approaches for a wide variety of issues and concerns commonly encountered during the planning, design, and construction of transportation projects. NNTB LU Cl Ld \ � � -\k�\ \\\\ 0 CO 2-2 < < < LU /§ z LU @ \ 0 a t a& § § � rw - / - r < § ] ] ro ) Bm L f kch§LuOf k k\§0 �z 2 a0.. § $ ) ) co ) o \ z> § ƒ m � /cn ° U. § kZ z zLU LU ], in < IL & LU )—�■—§( - L)) § 3 _ ) = z CL LLI in ( LU LU § LU 0 | C U , k sae 2 2 ° G ) E ) k k \ LU 0- 2- § $ \ kk k § \/a. LU kk�k �-! 2! �® 0 z W! �! J 22 ' - W � \ | ) r� )) m L) I- _ f{��a § Ll 3.1 k )k\}\0 § o 2 } kkcoUc� k 0 L LUkLU 2 \ mci ( § j0 \ ) �ME n �C� k CLCO § CDELU ± cn 2 % co co \ 2 M §o w 0 _ƒ ka $\K z CL z= LU \ �§ § 2 zo §o 2 / < z x KEY PERSONNEL EXPERIENCE ED PONCE, PE, CPM Project Manager Ed Ponce brings 25 years of experience in work program planning and transportation project delivery. During his tenure at FDOT District 1(D1), Ed served in a variety of roles including Project Manager, Local Agency Program (LAP) Coordinator, Senior Design Engineer Supervisor and District Roadway Design Engineer. In these different leadership facets, Ed acquired exceptional experience and knowledge in LAP, production management, consultant management, roadway design, resurfacing project delivery, safe routes to schools, complete streets and safety. ED PONCE, PE, CPM Project Experience: Firm Production Management Consultant (PMC), City of Tampa, Tampa, FL — Production HNTB Corporation Manager for the City of Tampa Mobility Department, providing delivery of the City's Transportation Capital Improvement Program and supporting the planning, design, Education B.S., Civil Engineering, University of construction, operation, monitoring, maintenance and management of the City's multimodal South Florida, 1994 transportation system. Provides programmatic support to advance the City's Vision Zero Program and Citywide Mobility Plan (Tampa M.O.V.E.S.). Professional Registrations General Engineering Consultant (GEC), Florida Department of Transportation District Professional Engineer: One, Bartow, FL — Project Manager for HNTB, providing subconsultant support for D1's FL, 2001 (#56818) General Engineering Consultant (GEC) contract, serving D1's Design, Project Management, Traffic Operations, and Intermodal Systems Development (ISD) offices. Certifications &Training Certified Public Manager (2019) GEC, Tampa Hillsborough Expressway Authority (THEA), Tampa, FL — Project Manager Qualified Stormwater Management Inspector for the East Selmon PD&E Study, East Selmon Slip Ramps Design -Build project, and the (#3241) Nebraska Avenue widening PD&E Study. Responsible for RFP development, staff hour FDOT Leadership Academy negotiations, and project submittal reviews. Provided service for maintenance contract FDOT Graduate Leadership Academy preparation, CEI Scope of Services development, Roadway Plans quality review, project AASHTO National Transportation scheduling prioritization support, and preparation of Permit Forms for full adoption by THEA. Management Conference Maintenance of Traffic (Advanced) Tampa Bay Next Owner's Representative Florida Department of Transportation District Seven, Tampa, FL — Project Manager to develop draft plans for the Green Street Access Professional Affiliations Improvement, serving the Hillsborough County School Board's warehouse facility. Duties American Society of Civil Engineers included coordination with the school board, coordination with D7 Program Management, and preparation of "Fast Response" contract plans. Hire Date with HNTB March 2020 Chief Engineer GEC, Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) Central Office, Statewide, FL — Support the Office of the Chief Engineer in evaluating contractor workforce Years of Experience with prioritization — providing data -centered analysis of future contracting resource needs other Employers statewide based on project funding levels and complexity. Analyzed construction contract 24 duration for key projects in each district, to validate statewide contract production rates and properly define the contract time performance measure. Prior to joining HNTB, Ed's project experience included the following: District Roadway Design Engineer, FDOT District One, Bartow, FL — Engineer who led the District's In -House Roadway Design Team, consisting of the Roadway Design unit, Traffic Design unit, Computer Assisted Drafting and Design Support unit and the Landscape Architect. Successfully delivered over 200 roadway improvements and landscaping projects at a total estimated cost of over $500 Million. Provided design technical expertise for FDOT HNTB KEY PERSONNEL EXPERIENCE projects, the local government, managed projects and private construction projects on the state highway system in the district. Established policy, criteria and standards for the FDOT as part of the District Roadway Design Engineers Team, reviewing and innovating FDOT's statewide approach to design criteria, standards, specifications and industry practice. Managed the District's Small County Outreach Program (SCOP) and the Small County Road Assistance Program (SCRAP). Evaluated, ranked and provided funding for road improvement projects for the six Rural Area of Opportunity (RAO) counties within D1. Built relationships with RAO County Engineers and all agencies served by D1. Managed the District's annual Resurfacing Program, allocating resources and funds to ensure proper maintenance and upkeep of 3000 centerline miles of state highways. Developed the FDOT's Complete Streets Improvement Plan as a member of the Complete Streets Task Force. Served as Expert Witness providing testimony for Eminent Domain acquisition cases. Senior Design Engineer, District Roadway Design Engineer, FDOT District One, Bartow, FL — Engineer responsible for motivating, challenging, hiring, training and evaluating performance for seven direct report state employees and three contract consultants. Oversaw the selection, acquisition, management and performance evaluation of three districtwide contracted consultant firms. Delivered 93 transportation projects at a total construction cost of approximately $250 Million. Served as Engineer of Record (EOR) for over 50 transportation projects. Oversaw the selection, acquisition, management and performance evaluation of three districtwide contracted consultant firms. Environmental Permitting Program, FDOT District One, Bartow, FL — District Environmental Permitting Engineer who led a team of three employees and one consultant in managing and coordinating the District Environmental Permitting office. Responsible for submitting and processing all environmental permits to allow for successful completion of all FDOT District 1 projects. HNTB ED PONCE, PE, CPM KEY PERSONNEL EXPERIENCE JULIAN GUTIERREZ, PE Deputy Project Manager Julian Gutierrez has extensive experience in structural design. He specializes in preliminary and final design for bridges and associated structures in both steel and concrete. Julian's varied experience ranges from simple miscellaneous structures such as mast arms, box culverts and strain poles to complex multilevel interchanges with bridges comprised of curved, steel boxes, steel plate girders, prestressed concrete beams, AASHTO beams and segmental concrete. He is well -versed in the coordination efforts required between other disciplines and facility owners. Project Experience: Eleven Bridge Replacements Project, Collier County, FL - Project manager for the replacement of eleven structurally deficient and functionally obsolete bridges in rural Collier County east of Immokalee and State Road 29. These existing timber foundation bridges had repairs made to them over the years, but they were built in the late 1940s and early 1950s and were all in need of replacement. HNTB's approach to this project was to provide the County with the most cost-effective and time -efficient replacement plans for these 11 deficient bridges. Providing uniform and consistent details amongst all the bridges allowed for increased productivity, efficiency and quality for the contractor and the final product. Replacement bridges consist of 30, 35, and 40-foot spans with overall bridge lengths ranging from 60 to 175 feet. Spans are supported on pile bents with 18-inch prestressed concrete piles, and the superstructure for all 11 bridges consisted of prestressed concrete Florida Slab Beams which also accommodated phased bridge construction. At some locations retaining walls were required to minimize wetland impacts. Vanderbilt Drive Bridge Replacements, Collier County, FL — Project Manager who coordinated roadway and structural design, pavement design, traffic control plans, signing and pavement marking, utility relocation design, utility coordination, drainage and environmental permitting services. This project consisted of the replacement of two functionally obsolete bridges located on Vanderbilt Drive and resurfacing/reconstructing the roadway between the two bridges. Additional improvements include a shared -use path along the west side of the road within the project limits, access to an existing canoe launch at Little Horse Pass and roadway profile modifications to improve stopping sight distance at the intersection of Vanderbilt Drive and entrance into the Marina Bay Club condominiums. The project begins approximately 0.7 miles north of CR 846 and ends at the south approach to the bridge over the Cocohatchee River. The new bridges will consist of a four-sided box culvert and a single - span Florida I -Beam bridge. Maintaining traffic during construction and relocating public utilities to enable continuous service was critical. As Project Manager, Julian coordinated roadway and structural design, pavement design, traffic control plans, signing and pavement marking, utility relocation design, utility coordination, drainage and environmental permitting services. New Tampa Boulevard Extension over 1-75 to Commerce Boulevard, City of Tampa, Tampa, FL — Structural Engineer responsible for the peer review and quality control of the plans and design documentation. This project included the design of a 0.7-mile extension of New Tampa Boulevard to Commerce Boulevard. A four -lane curved steel bridge was designed to carry the extension over 1-75. This fully landscaped gateway bridge includes numerous architectural enhancements. The purpose of the extension is to provide a direct connection to Liberty Middle and Freedom High Schools, City of Tampa parks and other local businesses and residences, as well as relief for Bruce B. Downs Boulevard. Sidewalks and pedestrian connections will ensure safe passage along the roadway and bridge across 1-75. JULIAN GUTIERREZ, PE Firm HNTB Corporation Education ME, University of South Florida, 1997 BSCE, University of South Florida, 1990 Professional Registrations Professional Engineer: FL, 1995, (#48879) GA, 1999, (#25330) SC, 2007, (#25917) VA, 2014, (#44358) Professional Affiliations American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) National Council of Examiners for Engineering & Surveying, 31141 Hire Date with HNTB October 2015 Years of Experience with other Firms 25 HNTB KEY PERSONNEL EXPERIENCE The extensive landscaping and aesthetic features incorporated throughout the project were developed with input from local residents and students. 1-75 at US 301 Interchange, Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) District 1, Manatee County, FL — Lead Structures Engineer for this project which consists of widening a six -lane interstate to eight lanes and major modifications to the interchange. The project length is four miles. The interchange modifications involve the reconstruction of the partial cloverleaf to a diamond interchange. This requires two new 4,000-foot-long structures for two legs of the diamond interchange to span the Manatee River. Two additional 1,000-foot-long structures over Salt Marsh will also be widened. All stormwater is being treated within the existing right-of-way. I-4/US 192 Interchange, FDOT District 5, Osceola County, FL — Lead Structural Engineer. Responsibilities included all aspects of design, plans preparation and coordination with other disciplines for four bridges and multiple temporary and permanent retaining walls. This project was the first phase in the reconstruction of the existing interchange to accommodate the current improvements to US 192 and ultimate improvements to 1-4. This required the demolition of two existing bridges, construction of five new bridges, widening of an existing bridge and miscellaneous structures design. Three of the bridges were two -span continuous steel plate girder bridges and one was a nine -span continuous steel box girder flyover bridge. Maintenance of traffic was coordinated with phase construction and temporary MSE walls. Clearwater Beach Transit Center, Pinellas Suncoast Transit Authority, Clearwater, FL — Structural QC Engineer for the construction of a new Transit Center along Causeway Boulevard in Clearwater Beach. This Transit Center will serve as one of the main service points for tourists traveling to and from Tampa International Airport and Downtown Clearwater. Responsibilities included the design of a new boardwalk connection between the existing trail along Causeway Boulevard and the parking lot directly north of the proposed bus bay. Also provided design criteria and shop drawing review of the proposed bus bay canopy. ITS/Advanced Traffic Management Systems (ATMS)/Traffic Services, Pinellas County, Clearwater FL — Structures Manager for the miscellaneous planning, design, post -design and integration services for ITS, ATMS and traffic engineering in Pinellas County. Work included design of foundations and structural supports for Dynamic Message Signs (DIMS) and CCTV cameras on Park Blvd (CR 694/SR 694), Tampa Road (CR 752), SR 580 and SR 586, Phase 3 ATMS Countywide. SR 80 from Dalton Lane Indian Hills Drive, FDOT District 1, Hendry County, FL — Structural QA/QC responsible for the supervision, quality control and coordination of all activities related to the design of the bridges and the miscellaneous structures. This project consists of reconstructing the existing rural, undivided two-lane SR 80 typical section into a rural, four -lane divided highway. The westbound lanes will be constructed by milling and overlaying the existing roadway. The proposed eastbound lanes will be constructed to the south of the existing roadway allowing for a 64-foot median. This reconstruction requires the replacement of the existing box culvert over the C-2 Canal with two new flat slab bridges that service both the eastbound and westbound traffic along with new parallel structures over the C-3 and C-4 Canals. Both structures are also comprised of flat slab superstructures founded on pile bents. JULIAN GUTIERREZ, PE KEY PERSONNEL EXPERIENCE LEN BECKER Principal -in -Charge Len Becker is a senior vice president and the office leader for HNTB's West Florida offices. In this role, Len is in charge of all aspects of the West Florida practice and delivery of HNTB's services. He is also a senior project manager experienced in planning, design and construction of transportation, toll/managed lanes, transit, municipal and utility projects. Len's diverse project experience includes visioning, strategic planning, planning studies, PD&E, design plans and specifications, quality control and quality assurance, constructability reviews, value engineering, technical support during construction, construction engineering, public involvement, innovative projects delivery and integration of emerging transportation technology. LEN BECKER Project Experience: Firm Eleven Bridge Replacements Project, Collier County, FL — Principal -in -Charge responsible HNTB Corporation for the replacement of eleven structurally deficient and functionally obsolete bridges in rural Education Collier County east of Immokalee and State Road (SR) 29. These existing timber foundation M.S., Civil Engineering, Michigan State bridges had repairs made to them over the years, but they were built in the late 1940s and University, 1999 early 1950s and were all in need of replacement. HNTB's approach to this project was to B.S., Civil Engineering, Michigan State University, 1998 provide the County with the most cost-effective and time -efficient replacement plans for these 11 deficient bridges. Providing uniform and consistent details amongst all the bridges allowed Professional Registrations for increased productivity, efficiency and quality for the contractor and the final product. Professional Engineer: Replacement bridges consist of 30, 35, and 40-foot spans with overall bridge lengths ranging MI, 2003, (#6201049963) from 60 to 175 feet. Spans are supported on pile bents with 18-inch prestressed concrete Professional Affiliations piles, and the superstructure for all 11 bridges consisted of prestressed concrete Florida Slab Tampa Bay Partnership, Board Member Beams which also accommodated phased bridge construction. At some locations retaining Greater Tampa Chamber of Commerce, walls were required to minimize wetland impacts. Transportation Advisory Committee Florida Institute of Consulting Engineers General Engineering Consultant, FDOT District 1, Districtwide, FL — Principal -in -Charge Florida Transportation Builders Association, responsible for independent work tasks, including project reviews and design. Project reviews Inc. include the design -build review for US 27 from Barry Road to US 192 and the Design -Build Conference of Minority Transportation Review for US 41 from CR 951 to Greenway Road. Design projects include a pedestrian Officials bridge study over the Myakkahatchee Creek, the US 41 over US 301 Bridge Study, the 1-75 Hire Date with HNTB Rest Areas Capacity Study, and improvements to Lock 7 Park in Okeechobee County with January 2011 permitting through FDEP, USACE and SFWMD. Lakeland Area Alternatives Analysis PD&E, FDOT District 1, Polk County, FL — Principal- Years of Experience with other Firms in -Charge for this feasibility/PD&E study to determine a multi -modal approach for improved 12 transportation planning throughout the northern portion of Lakeland. The study area is bounded by Kathleen Road to the west, US 92 to the south, 1-4 to the north and Lakeland Hills Boulevard to the east. Innovative data collection and project approaches are being utilized throughout this study. SR 52 (Schrader Highway) from US 41/SR 45 to CR 581/Bellamy Brothers Boulevard, FDOT District 7, Pasco County, FL — Principal -in -Charge for this project to add lanes and reconstruct a two-lane undivided facility to a four -lane divided facility with bike lanes on the paved shoulders and a shared -use path within the right of way. The nine -mile design also accommodates the future six -lane divided facility. The project includes pond siting and floodplain analysis of 15 basins, bridge hydraulic and scour analysis with permitting through SWFWMD and USACE. As part of this project, coordination was done with the SWFWMD Conner Preserve (4F property) to optimize the floodplain compensation design for SR 52 while avoiding 4F impacts and adverse impacts to the wetlands. KEY PERSONNEL EXPERIENCE SR 60 from Valrico Road to East of Dover Road, FDOT District 7, Hillsborough County, FL — Principal -in -Charge for this project to widen a four -lane divided facility to a six -lane divided facility with bike lanes on the paved shoulders. Activities performed on this projcet by the HNTB team included the pond siting analysis, stormwater management design, floodplain compensation design and storm drain design with permitting through the Southwest Florida Water Management District (SWFWMD) and United States Army Core of Engineers (USACE). The project included the update and conversion of the existing Hillsborough County Alafia River SWMM model and associated GIS database. The model was converted to a regional Green-Ampt based Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing model which was verified against field observations and used for the roadway profile/floodplain compensation design within a major depressional low traversed by SR 60. Owner's Representative, Tampa Bay Next (TB NEXT), FDOT District 7, Hillsborough, Polk, and Pinellas Counties, FL — Principal -in -charge responsible for program support, client satisfaction, and delivering HNTB staffing commitments. As Owner's Representative, HNTB supports FDOT District 7 in all aspects of public involvement, planning, environmental studies, concept development, traffic analysis, preliminary engineering and design -build procurement. The TB NEXT program includes modernization of 90 miles of interstate in nine project segments, encompassing four systems interchanges and over 200 lane miles of proposed tolled express lanes. The program also covers the integration of multimodal transportation projects, local road system enhancements and complete streets implementation. The TB NEXT program cost is estimated at approximately $7 billion. HNTB services include: program management; project management; public involvement and stakeholder engagement; supporting District 7's workforce development initiative; extensive alternatives development, analysis and cost comparisons; environmental studies and review or preparation of various environmental documents, from categorical exclusions to a supplemental.w Traffic Continuing Services for Traffic Operations, FDOT District 1, Districtwide, FL — Principal -in -Charge for this continuing services contract to support FDOT District 1 traffic operations. Task work orders include in-house support for the safety program, TSM&O program, and studies and design. Home office support includes program management, Lakeland Intelligent Rail Bypass post design services and conceptual design services. This 5- year, $5 million contract covers a wide range of services and encompasses the entire district. Automated Vehicle Support Consultant, FDOT Central Office, Tallahassee, FL — Principal -in -Charge for this task work order -based contract. Under this contract, HNTB serves as a general consultant supporting the Florida Automated Vehicles Initiative. As part of this contract, HNTB supported the development of the FDOT Automated and Connected Vehicles Strategic Plan that will be released in December 2015. The strategic planning process brought FDOT, HNTB and other industry thought leaders together for a facilitated visioning workshop and then engaged the Florida Automated Vehicles Initiative Steering Committee to finalize the plan. HNTB is also supporting the development and launch of the FDOT Automated Vehicles Academy, which held its first session in February 2016.Other responsibilities include planning and delivery of the annual Florida Automated Vehicles Summit and Data Symposium. Through this contract, HNTB supports the AV/CV Working Groups, interacts with all FDOT Districts and many other industry stakeholders, coordinates with the FDOT Research Center to fund AV research projects and supports the development of USDOT and other grant applications. LEN BECKER 12 KEY PERSONNEL EXPERIENCE SADIE DALTON, PE Structures Lead Sadie Dalton is a structural engineer with experience designing prestressed concrete bridges and miscellaneous structures. She has experience in all project phases from planning through post -design and has worked in different roles as a designer, project manager, plans reviewer, and consultant. From 2017 to 2019, Sadie served as the office quality manager for the West Florida offices during which time she oversaw the implementation of HNTB's corporate quality management system for the Tampa, Tallahassee and Chipley offices. Project experience: Eleven Bridge Replacements Project, Collier County, FL — Deputy Project Manager and Structures Engineer of Record for the replacement of 11 structurally deficient and functionally obsolete bridges with timber pile foundations. Replacement bridges consist of 30, 35, and 40- SADIE DALTON, PE foot spans with overall bridge lengths ranging from 60 to 175 feet. Spans are supported on pile bents with 18-inch prestressed concrete piles. Firm Golden Gate Estates Bridges PD&E, General Engineering Consultant (GEC) Services, HNTB Corporation FDOT District 1, Collier County, FL — Structural lead for the evaluation of the plausibility and Education impact of three new bridge connections over canals within the rural Golden Gate Estates. M.E., Civil Engineering University of Florida, Proposed bridge typical sections for 8th Street NE over Cypress Canal and 16th Street NEl47th 2011 Avenue NE over Golden Gate Main Canal. Coordinated bridge design criteria with the FDOT, B.S., Civil Engineering University of Florida, Collier County, and South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) and presented 2010 findings at public forums. B.A., Digital Arts, Stetson University, 2005 GEC Services, FDOT District 1, Bartow, FL — Structural Lead for the review of various Professional Registrations projects containing structural involvement throughout FDOT District 1 to help the District Professional Engineer: determine which projects to pursue and how to budget for its five-year work program. FL, 2016 (#80445) Examined existing structures for age, condition, type, etc. Provided recommendations and cost estimates for proposed improvements. Examples include: replacing the lighting on the Certifications &Training Desoto Bridge over the Manatee River (Manatee County), providing sidewalks and a FDOT Specifications Certification FDOT Contract Plans Reading pedestrian bridge adjacent to San Luiz Avenue in Clewiston (Hendry County), and widening existing bridges along Pine Island Road to provide sidewalks (Lee County). Professional Affiliations American Institute of Steel Construction SR 52 from US 411SR 45 to CR 581, FDOT District 7, Pasco County, FL — Structural (AISC) Designer for this nine -mile reconstruction project along SR 52 in Pasco County. A two-lane American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) rural roadway will be reconstructed to a four -lane divided rural roadway with a provision for a future six -lane build out. Prepared the Bridge Development Report and final design plans for Hire Date with HNTB the replacement of the existing box culvert at Cypress Creek with a dual bridge system. January 2012 Bruce B. Downs Boulevard, Hillsborough County Public Works, Tampa, FL — Structural Years of Experience with Designer for the 4.8-mile widening and reconstruction of Bruce B. Downs Boulevard, a major other Firms roadway in Tampa. The project involved the widening and reconstructing of the roadway 0 typical section from the existing four -lane divided rural section to an eight -lane divided urban roadway with a transit envelope within the existing right of way. There are four major intersections located within the project limits and numerous access management points. This was a conventional design project. I-951SR 9 Widening from Brevard County Line to SR 44, FDOT District 5, Volusia County, FL — Structural Designer responsible for the redesign of the end bents and piers of the 1-95 bridges over SR 44 (Bridge Nos. 790064 and 790065) to incorporate the use of steel 13 KEY PERSONNEL EXPERIENCE H-piles rather than prestressed concrete piles. Performed a quality control check of the end bent design, pier elevation calculations, bar lists, expansion joints, and corresponding substructure plan sheets. Updated the load rating analysis of the proposed widened structure. Checked the design of a whaler sheet pile wall. Redesigned an intermediate bridge pier during post -design to accommodate as -built pile cut-off elevations below those shown in the contract plans. HEFT Widening from South of SW 216t" Street to North of SW 184t" Street, Florida's Turnpike Enterprise, Miami. FL — Structural Designer for this 2.404-mile corridor widening project responsible for superstructure design and load ratings of four bridges. Reviewed shop drawings and requests for information (RFI) during post -design. Wekiva Parkway (SR 429) from North of SR 500 (US 441) to North of Ponkan Road, Central Florida Expressway Authority (CFX), Orange County, FL — Structural Designer who performed design and quality control tasks. Checked substructure, pier, pot bearing, and expansion joint designs. Designed the end bents for the bridges over the Low Area (Bridge Nos. 750857 and 750858). Backchecked the retaining wall plans and updated wall quantities. Forest Lakes Boulevard from West of Pine Avenue to West of Race Track Road Reconstruction and Widening, Pinellas County, FL — Structural Engineer for the design of eight traffic signal mast arms. GEC Services, Tampa -Hillsborough Expressway Authority (THEA), Hillsborough County, FL — Structural engineer for various tasks including quantity estimates for the cleaning and coating of the reversible elevated lanes; insurance valuation and work program estimates for all THEA-owned bridges; an interactive bridge inventory to map and provide detailed structural information for every bridge owned by THEA; existing overhead cantilevers analysis for DMS replacement; and services related to conventional design projects. GEC Services, Florida's Turnpike Enterprise, Statewide, FL — Structural designer and reviewer for various tasks. Evaluated existing toll structures on the Sawgrass Expressway for the capacity to support new tolling equipment. Designed multipost Toll -by -Plate signs for placement along the Suncoast/Veterans Expressway. Reviewed plans and shop drawings for the Veterans Expressway widening. SR 600 Drainage Improvement Project, FDOT District 1, Polk County, FL — Structural Engineer for this project which included the addition of 1500 linear feet of a 42-inch storm drain outfall pipe to alleviate a flooding concern. The structure's design for the reconstructed seawall and critical sheet pile walls required permitting through SWFWMD. Innovative construction methods were also investigated in order to avoid vibratory impacts to the nearby houses and seawall and provide construction cost savings to the Department. Brightline (formerly All Aboard Florida) Program Management Contract, Florida East Coast Industries, Miami to Orlando, FL — Structural Designer for multiple structures, including direct -fixation rail bridge, trench and two types of tunnel structures. For the north - south segment, served as a peer reviewer for proposed Miami Station bridges. SADIE DALTON, PE 14 KEY PERSONNEL EXPERIENCE JOHN DEWEY, PE Roadway/MOT Lead John Dewey is a senior engineer with more than 20 years of experience in design and project management for projects involving adding capacity and right of way (ROW) acquisition, including a wide range of resurfacing, restoration and rehabilitation, interstate and urban/suburban widening and reconstruction projects throughout Florida. John's responsibilities have included serving as lead roadway designer, lead maintenance of traffic (MOT) designer, deputy project manager, project manager and quality manager. John also supervises and coordinates the work of engineering teams and performs quality control, design submittal reviews, project scheduling, progress reporting, developing cost estimates, and negotiating design contracts on behalf of the FDOT. Project Experience: CR 578 (County Line Road) from the Suncoast to US 41, Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) District 7, Hernando County, FL — Project Manager and Engineer of Record for $28 million new alignments of four lanes divided arterial in Hernando County. The route extends northward through mostly undeveloped pastures terminating east of US 41, north of Masaryktown. It is classified as a minor arterial road and is being designed as a four - lane suburban section that takes into account a future six -lane urban section. The suburban section includes a 22-foot curb and gutter median on the inside and a five-foot paved shoulder on the outside with a design speed of 45 mph. Elements of this project include new roadway alignment, ROW acquisition, two intersections, geotechnical activities, surveys, drainage, signing and pavement markings, signalization, utility coordination, ROW maps and legal descriptions, MOT, cost estimates, environmental permits and quantity computation books. This project also included coordination with two municipalities, property owners, developers and other design firms as well as the Department. Kathleen Road and North Galloway Road to Duff Road Improvements, Polk County Transportation Engineering Division, Polk County, FL — Deputy Project Manager for the final delivery of a 2.9-mile project to reconstruct a two-lane rural roadway to a four -lane urban facility. Responsible for all roadway elements of the design and personally developed all mainline roadway geometry including horizontal alignment and vertical profile, superelevation transitions, and cross slope transition for intersections and railroad crossing. Prepared the pavement design package, developed traffic control plans and led the staff responsible for plan preparation. US 98 From CR 540A to Clubhouse Road, FDOT District 1, Bartow, FL — Roadway Designer responsible for pavement design report and roadway plans component quality control reviews. The project included roadway widening, milling and resurfacing, and limits areas of roadway reconstruction to increase capacity from a four -lane typical section to a six - lane typical section. Owner's Representative, Tampa Bay Next (TB NEXT), FDOT District 7, Hillsborough, Polk, and Pinellas Counties, FL — Owner's Representative Project Manager for the adjacent 10-mile segment of 1-75, just north of Moccasin Wallow. Responsible for managing consultant PD&E and design efforts on behalf of the Department. Similar to 1-75, this project includes developing unique interchange concepts, using microsimulation and origin -destination patterns to develop ingress/egress and evaluation of buffer versus barrier wall typical sections. In addition, the project included the preservation of existing features, such as bridges and pavement sections. As Owner's Representative, HNTB supports FDOT District 7 in all aspects of public involvement, planning, environmental studies, concept development, traffic analysis, preliminary engineering and design -build procurement. The TB NEXT program JOHN DEWEY, PE Firm HNTB Corporation Education B.S., Civil Engineering, Virginia Military Institute,1998 Professional Registrations Professional Engineer: FL, 2008, (#68563) Professional Affiliations Florida Institute of Consulting Engineers, Professional Practices Committee Florida Engineering Society, Professional Concerns Committee American Society of Civil Engineers Society of American Military Engineers Hire Date with HNTB May 2017 Years of Experience with other Firms 19 15 KEY PERSONNEL EXPERIENCE includes modernization of 90 miles of interstate in nine project segments, encompassing four systems interchanges and over 200 lane miles of proposed tolled express lanes. The program also covers the integration of multimodal transportation projects, local road system enhancements and complete streets implementation. The TB NEXT program cost is estimated at approximately $7 billion. HNTB services include: program management; project management; public involvement and stakeholder engagement; supporting District 7's workforce development initiative; extensive alternatives development, analysis and cost comparisons; environmental studies and review or preparation of various environmental documents from categorical exclusions to a supplemental EIS; regional traffic modeling and micro -simulation analysis; express lane network and access planning; concept design of express lane systems and complex interchanges; program sequencing; work programming; cost and schedule management; and design -build RFP development, procurement support and design -build plans review. 1-4 Express Lanes PD&E, FDOT District 7, Hillsborough and Polk Counties, FL — Design Engineer responsible for this PD&E leading complex, technical, regulatory -driven project delivery, and working with FDOT District 7 Project Management Office. Responsibilities involve working with environmental scientists, natural and cultural specialists, planners, other project managers and support staff across multiple teams. Similar to 1-75, this project includes developing unique interchange concepts, using microsimulation and origin -destination patterns to develop ingress/egress and evaluation of buffer versus barrier wall typical sections. In addition, the project included the preservation of existing features, such as bridges and pavement sections. 1-4 required unique coordination with Brightline for their expansion to Tampa. This project consists of a system of express lanes that are being planned for the Tampa Bay area. 1-275 from North of Osbourne to North of Bearrs Avenue, FDOT District 7, Tampa Bay, FL — Design Engineer responsible for this 6.9-mile PD&E. Working with FDOT District 7 Project Management Office, was responsible for barrier separated versus buffer separated alternative analysis and operational improvement project development. This project included the need for cost-effective, interim operational improvements. It consisted of a system of express lanes being planned for the Tampa Bay area. Other activities included NEPA project coordination, SEIS development and public engagement. Commercial Boulevard to SW 10th Street, FDOT District 4, Broward County, FL — Senior Project Engineer for the design to convert the existing high -occupancy vehicle lanes to tolled express lanes, adding one additional tolled express lane in each direction in conjunction with three to four general use lanes (existing) in the project limits. The project also included multiple bridge widenings, drainage improvements, soundwalls, signing, lighting, installation of new intelligent transportation system, tolling infrastructure and ramp metering and complete oversight of asset management during construction. General Engineering Consultant (GEC), Florida's Turnpike Enterprise (FTE), Statewide, FL — Project Manager responsible for developing the request for proposal and leading procurement process for operational improvements on the Veteran's Expressway. Served as Owner's Representative through execution of the low -bid, DB project. HNTB has been providing services to the FTE since its inception in the 1950s, currently serving as a toll GEC to deliver FTE's growing, $5.2 billion work program across their 483-lane-mile system. HNTB leads the toll operations portion of the contract and is deeply involved in all aspects of toll operations, business rules and technology replacement projects. JOHN DEWEY, PE KEY PERSONNEL EXPERIENCE CHRISTINE DIAZ Public Involvement Lead Christine Diaz brings 24 years of experience as a Communications Project Manager. She is a results -driven, self -motivated and versatile bilingual manager with a proven ability to develop and strengthen diverse teams in order to maximize productivity and efficiency. Christine possesses excellent communication skills and the ability to create sustainable relationships with customers, clients and stakeholders across the county. Project Experience: CHRISTINE DIAZ Multi -Use Corridors of Regional Economic Significance (MCORES) Southwest Central Florida Connector, Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) Central Office, Firm Statewide, FL - Public Involvement Lead for HNTB. HNTB was selected by FDOT as the HNTB Corporation Owner's Representative for the 140-mile Southwest -Central Florida Connector contract. The Education Southwest -Central Florida Connector was one of three corridors identified in the Florida B.S.O.E., Corporate Training Development, legislation as a part of the new MCORES program. This program is an innovative approach to Baptist Wayland University, 2008 planning that combines updating land -use and comprehensive plans, enhancing quality of life, protecting the environment, and providing for future infrastructure needs including roadways, Certifications & Training rails, trails, broadband, energy and smart infrastructure. Certification, Train the Trainer, University of Commuter Services 12-County Regional Program, FDOT, Southwest, FL — Project Alaska, Anchorage, AK, 2010 Manager whose duties entailed working with public sector agencies and private sector entities 2014 Commuter Choice TDM Certification to facilitate FDOT's commuter service program throughout District One. Christine helped 2015 Social Marketing in Transportation Florida State Certified Bike Safety develop innovative partnerships, outreach campaigns, and messaging in order to promote more efficient transportation activities. Professional Affiliations Tampa Bay Area Regional Transit Authority, Phase 1-2, FDOT District 7, Tampa, FL— American Society of Civil Engineers Project Manager responsible for managing team training, applicant recruitments, escalations, Hire Date with HNTB quality control and volunteer staffing. Provided contract management, budget, creative November 2019 marketing campaigns, performance reports and overall management oversight for the $1.5 million -dollar FDOT Commuter Assistance Program. Managed resource schedules, while Years of Experience with her Employers other coordinating with other project managers across multiple projects. Provided guidance, 23 coaching and feedback to direct reports, including goal setting and career development for multiple projects. URSIAECOM Technology Corporation, Transportation Demand Management and Outreach Training Programs, Orlando, FL — Project Manager responsible for facilitating client communications, presentations, talking points, quarterly newsletters, public service announcements, radio, educational campaigns, and media interviews. Partnered with multiple cross -functional teams to reach customer goals and key performance metrics. Participated in and hosted planning committees, research projects, network events, assessments, leadership forums and national and international training sessions for specific client topics. Commuter Krewe of Louisiana Baton Rouge, LA — Technical Advisor and Client Relationship Advisor responsible for establishing partnerships with elected officials, legislative groups, nonprofits, government, corporate, educational institutions, developers, hospitals and policy boards. Federal Emergency Management Homeland Security, External Affairs Division, FL - Public Relations Specialist and program lead supervised development and implementation of FEMA programs. Coordinated with state, city, federal governmental officials, non -profits and other emergency management programs. Administered training and development of program policies, guidelines of long-term recovery and closeout mission. Coordinated statewide public �:I►kK 17 KEY PERSONNEL EXPERIENCE relations events for 67 County FEMA tour, team deliverables, public relations and marketing communications groups. Translated media releases, documents and coordinated with Public Information Office (PIO) and Latin marketing agencies. Managed notifications of federal disbursement of grants and contracts for congressional, state agencies and local governments Coordinated with project officers and upper management for closeout of long-term recovery cases and legislative issues. Emergency Home Repair Program, Virgin Islands Housing Authority, Federal Emergency Management System (FEMA) Virgin Islands, Orlando, FL — Call Center Manager responsible for launching and managing the Virgin Island Disaster Recovery Call Center initiative by monitoring system performance, coordinating with two call center teams and Human Resources (HR), identified and resolved problems, prepared and completed action plans, scripts and manuals. Completed system audits and analysis in English and Spanish, managed system teams, process improvement and quality assurance programs, and worked with vendors and contractors for upgrades and client change orders. Southeast Texas Regional Planning Commission (SETRPC), Beaumont, TX — Outreach Project Manager who supervised development and implementation of outreach programs, large events, social media, award ceremonies, challenges, recognitions, media promotions, public relations delivery and comprehensive program training services for over 180 Florida - based companies. Supervised implementation of strategic outreach to engage the involvement of new companies and stakeholders through negotiations, planning, change management, reporting and hands-on marketing activities to achieve targets. Developed and executed client promotions to drive consumer traffic to the Statewide Database to support client satisfaction, deliverables, engagement and overall program growth. Federal Emergency Management Homeland Security, Iowa Disaster, FL — Public Assistance(PA) Group Supervisor and Closeout Specialist who administered applicant kickoff meetings, scope meetings, disaster reviews, funding eligibility, preliminary damage assessments, project formulations, special considerations, approvals in the administrative million -dollar queue and quality control division. Coordinated with government agencies, project officers and elected officials for closeout of long-term recovery cases. Trained local governments on the closeout process and appeals. Handled special assignments as PA crew leader for state agencies for the State of Iowa. Presented at forums and emergency management discussion panels. Handled all funding processes for four state agencies with community outreach. CHRISTINE DIAZ HNTB W KEY PERSONNEL EXPERIENCE DAVID HUBBARD, PE Roadway/MOT David Hubbard has 11 years of experience in a multitude of engineering and design management tasks. David is an experienced transportation/highway design engineer competent in roadway geometrics, maintenance of traffic design, pavement design, and design variations and exceptions. In addition, David has five years of experience in stormwater management retention and detention pond design, culvert and storm drainage facility design, open channel hydraulics and has facilitated permitting through various state and local agencies. He is also knowledgeable in utility relocation and conflict resolution and project development, innovative intersection design and environment (PD&E)/long-range planning. He is experienced in delivering projects, being responsible for all facets of the roadway plan component, including design variations and other design documents. David provided traffic control guidance and post -design support for projects under construction He is proficient with engineering programs such as Microstation/GEOPAK, ICPR, ASAD, ArcGIS and AutoCAD. Project Experience: LAAA Study, FDOT District 1, Polk County, FL — Roadway Engineer and Concept Developer for this feasibility/PD&E study. Developed roadway design concepts, typical sections and ConceptStation renderings based on traffic models and multi -use corridor directives. The LAAA study is intended to assist the District and its transportation partners in defining a program of context -sensitive solutions to improve the transportation, safety, economic and quality of life goals within the corridor across all modes of transportation. I- 27511-inks Stage 3 Design -Build (DB), Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) District 7, Tampa, FL — Design Deputy Project Manager during construction responsible for delegating post -design tasks, component final design tasks and other roadway -related tasks. Engineer of Record for design components such as design variations and exceptions, traffic control plans, and design plan revisions. Provided project management support for budgeting and invoicing for post -design services as well as internal project reviews and financial audits. Responsible for weekly coordination with contractors and attending meetings on behalf of the design -builder to discuss and resolve design -related issues. Coordinated with FDOT staff for several final design and post -design tasks, especially relating to MOT, design exceptions, survey/SUE and ITS coordination. Led roadway design tasks and applied context -sensitive solutions to balance both the contractor's budget and FDOT expectations for the final product. US 19 from SR 580 to Northside Drive, FDOT District 7, Pinellas County, FL — Drainage/Roadway Engineer responsible for accomplishing all drainage tasks for 60% design plans, including SMF calculations using ICPR, smart box diversion structure design, storm sewer design using Geopak Drainage, cross drain calculations, report composition and documentation and coordinating CAD efforts. Provided guidance to roadway engineers regarding traffic control plans and concepts. Bruce B. Downs (CR 581) Boulevard Improvements, Tampa Port Authority, Hillsborough County, FL — Drainage Engineer responsible for permit packages and responding to reviewer comments for the Tampa Port Authority minor work permit for sovereign and submerged lands, an Environmental Project Commission of Hillsborough County wetland impacts permit and a Southwest Florida Water Management District permit modification. This project was a local agency program project with FDOT and is 3.6 miles in length and includes expanding the corridor from an existing four -lane rural section into an eight -lane urban section. DAVID HUBBARD, PE Firm HNTB Corporation Education B.S., Civil Engineering, University of Florida, 2010 Professional Registrations Professional Engineer: FL, 2015 (#79353) Professional Affiliations American Society of Civil Engineers Institute of Transportation Engineers Design Build Institute of America Hire Date with HNTB February 2018 Years of Experience with other Firms �7 KEY PERSONNEL EXPERIENCE SR 60 (Courtney Campbell Causeway), FDOT District 7, Hillsborough County, FL — Roadway Engineer responsible for the preparation of final construction plans, utility conflict resolutions, quantity computations, pavement design reports, variances and exceptions. The 5.4mile-long project included milling and surfacing of existing roadway mainlines, widening of turn lanes and construction of a shared -use path, which was fast -tracked to construction due to the Republican National Convention. General Engineering Consultant (GEC), Florida's Turnpike Enterprise (FTE), Statewide, FL — Engineer for the GEC contract. HNTB has been providing services to the FTE since its inception in the 1950s, currently serving as a toll GEC to deliver FTE's growing, $5.2 billion work program across their 483-lane-mile system. HNTB leads the toll operations portion of the contract and is deeply involved in all aspects of toll operations, business rules and technology replacement projects. Tampa Bay Next (TB Next) Owner's Representative, Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT), District 7, Tampa, FL — Highway Engineer responsible for preparation of concept plans, design variations and exceptions, engineer's estimate and pavement design for the State Road (SR) 60 Operational Improvements from SR 589 to Tampa Airport. Prepared portions of the request for proposal (RFP), reviewed Design Build Firm proposals, plan submittals, and design documentation. Prepared concept plans and LRE estimates for phased implementation of 1-275 express lanes from Lois Avenue to the Hillsborough River, including multiple options depending on lane configurations and express lane ramp connectivity and ingress/egress locations. Prepared concept plans and engineer's estimates for several operational improvement projects throughout the Hillsborough County interstate highways and resolved potential right-of-way impacts along with other design tasks. TECO Line Streetcar Infrastructure Assessment, City of Tampa, Tampa, FL — Site/Civil Engineer responsible for the inspection and analysis of the 2.7-mile long historic streetcar system's civil and site components, including railroad track geometry, special trackwork, station and pedestrian facilities, drainage, signage and electrical components. Created a geographical log of all findings using ArcGIS. Coordinated with specialty electrical and railway engineers to recommend need -based capital expenditures and prepared engineer's estimates. Prepared reports for all components of the inspection and recommendations. State Road (SR)1001Starke Railroad Overpass, FDOT District 2, Bradford County, FL - Roadway Engineer for the construction plans for this design -bid -build (DBB) project. This project is the District 2 Statewide Accelerated Transformation (SWAT) project, combining the PD&E and design process with one firm. Responsible for PD&E support for the public hearings and all components of the roadway design plans. Served as FOR for multiple design variations and the typical section package. Led coordination efforts between internal disciplines and subconsultants, responded to and delegated comment responses using the electronic review comment (ERC) website, attended coordination meetings with FDOT staff and other stakeholders including elected officials. DAVID HUBBARD, PE rze KEY PERSONNEL EXPERIENCE CRISTINA JACKSON, PE Drainage and Permitting Cristina Jackson has 17 years of experience serving as project manager and stormwater engineer -of -record (EOR) for urban and rural project development and environment (PD&E), resurfacing, widening and reconstruction design and post design projects. She has experience securing permits from the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) and the United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). Cristina has completed Pond Siting Reports and Location Hydraulic Reports and is proficient in the design and analysis of storm drains, ponds, floodplain compensation sites, ditches, cross drains, and bridge hydraulics with scour and the use of ICPR, ICPR with PercPack, PONDS, HDS-5, HY-8, ASAD, HEC-RAS, CRISTINA JACKSON, PE Microstation and GEOPAK. Firm Project Experience: HNTB Corporation SR 90 (US 41) from CR 951 to Greenway Road, FDOT District 1, Collier County, FL — Education Stormwater Engineer for the 3.6-mile widening and reconstruction of a two-lane rural road to a B.S., Environmental Engineering, University six -lane suburban divided road. Drainage FOR responsible for completing a Pond Siting of New Hampshire, 2003 analysis comparing the use of pond sites versus exfiltration trenches, four Bridge Hydraulics Professional Registrations Reports, stormwater permitting and storm drain design using ICPR with PercPack. Professional Engineer: General Engineering Consultant, FDOT District 1, Districtwide, FL — Stormwater Engineer FL, 2001 (#71435) for independent work tasks, including project reviews and design. Project reviews include the design -build review for US 27 from Barry Road to US 192 and the Design -Build Review for US Professional Affiliations 41 from CR 951 to Greenway Road. Design projects include a pedestrian bridge study over American Society of Civil Engineers the Myakkahatchee Creek, the US 41 over US 301 Bridge Study, the 1-75 Rest Areas Florida Stormwater Association Capacity Study, and improvements to Lock 7 Park in Okeechobee County with permitting through FDEP, USACE and SFWMD. Hire Date with HNTB April 2004 Districtwide Drainage Support Services, FDOT District 1, Districtwide, FL — Deputy Project Manager and Stormwater Engineer for this contract that includes stormwater Years of Experience with management studies, analyses and design in support of the District's work program and other Employers drainage unit. Responsible for task work order development, sub consultant coordination, 0 investigation of flooding complaints, stormwater analysis, stormwater management design, stormwater management design review, monthly progress reports and invoicing plus, internal project reviews to monitor scope, fee and schedule. SR 52 (Schrader Highway) from US 411SR 45 to CR 5811Bellamy Brothers Boulevard, FDOT District 7, Pasco County, FL — Project Manager for this project to add lanes and reconstruct a two-lane undivided facility to a four -lane divided facility with bike lanes on the paved shoulders and a shared -use path within the right of way. The nine -mile design also accommodates the future six -lane divided facility. The project includes pond siting and floodplain analysis of 15 basins, bridge hydraulic and scour analysis with permitting through SWFWMD and USACE. As part of this project, coordination was done with the SWFWMD Conner Preserve (41F property) to optimize the floodplain compensation design for SR 52 while avoiding 4F impacts and adverse impacts to the wetlands within the SWFWMD Conner Preserve. SR 700, Drainage Improvement Project, FDOT District 1, Okeechobee County, FL — Project Manager for this project which includes the addition of a four -acre pond site and approximately 3000 linear foot of open/closed storm drain outfall to alleviate existing flooding conditions along SR 7001US 98 from CSX to SR 70. Extensive coordination was required with the City of Okeechobee, Okeechobee County, six utilities and SFWMD to ensure no adverse �:I►iK ri KEY PERSONNEL EXPERIENCE impacts to downstream properties. The project also required ROW acquisition, legal agreements and drainage easements. The project was completed in 2019 with no construction claims or delays. SR 600, Drainage Improvement Project, FDOT District 1, Polk County, FL — Project Manager for this project which included the addition of 1500 linear feet of a 42-inch storm drain outfall pipe to alleviate a flooding concern. The project considerations included constrained right of way, jack and bore design, plus legal agreements and drainage easements between FDOT and the City. Extensive coordination was done to secure seven Utility Work Schedules and provide maintenance of traffic through City/County and FDOT roads. The project was completed in 2018 and received a constructability evaluation of 5 out of 5. 1-4 Express Lanes Project Development and Environment (PD&E) Study, FDOT District 7, Hillsborough/Pasco County, FL — Stormwater Engineer of Record for this PD&E study for the evaluation of implementing managed lanes along 1-4 from East of 50th to Polk CRISTINA JACKSON, PE Parkway. Stormwater Engineer of Record responsible for pond siting and floodplain analysis for 21 miles of 1-4 consisting of approximately 42 drainage basins and 13 floodplain areas. This PD&E project was done in conjunction with adjacent PD&E projects for 1-4 and 1-275 and frequent coordination and consistency with these other projects was a key to the success of this project. SR 60 from Valrico Road to East of Dover Road, FDOT District 7, Valrico, FL — Quality Control engineer for this widening project along two miles of SR 60 in Valrico, FL. A four -lane rural roadway will be widened and reconstructed to a six -lane high-speed urban facility. General Engineering Consultant, FDOT District 3, Districtwide, FL — Stormwater Engineer responsible for project reviews of all phase submittals including reviews of bridge hydraulic reports. US 231 (SR 75) from US 98 to SR 20, FDOT District 3, Bay County, FL — Stormwater Engineer responsible for five bridge hydraulic analyses and pond siting analysis for seven basins within this 20-mile corridor. The PD&E evaluated alternatives to widen SR 75 from four to six lanes from US 98 to SR 20. SR 97 over Little Pine Barren Creek, FDOT District 3, Escambia County, FL — Stormwater Engineer for the replacement of this structurally deficient, functionally obsolete bridge carrying SR 97 over the outfall of Wiggins Lake. Drainage Engineer -of -Record responsible for temporary and proposed drainage design, quality control of bridge hydraulic report, permitting coordination through the Northwest Florida Water Management District (NWFWMD), quantities and plans production. Chief Engineer Support Services, FDOT Central Office, Statewide, FL — Project Engineer for various task work order -based assignments including evaluation of shoulder width for FDM updates, typical section options to increase capacity in general use lanes, statewide rest area inventory and condition assessments, Yulee widening analysis and slip ramp design for COVID 19 checkpoints, and concept development plans and estimates for green bike lane replacements for various locations statewide. HNTB 22 KEY PERSONNEL EXPERIENCE KEN JACOBS, TSOS, RSP TSM&O/ITS Lead Ken Jacobs has more than 35 years of progressive experience in transportation systems management and operations with a focus in traffic engineering, traffic safety, traffic signal design and operation, intelligent transportation systems (ITS) and advanced traffic management systems (ATMS). He is a strategic leader with a successful track record of advancing the transportation field, developing strong intergovernmental partnerships and driving business and technology change initiatives, including adaptive signal control technology (ASCT), arterial level ITS, traffic incident management and advanced traveler information systems. Ken has substantial experience in traffic management center (TMC) design and operations, connected vehicle technology and traffic signal control software. Ken offers concentrated experience directing all phases of transportation project activities including project planning, programming, contracts, agreements, design, operations, and maintenance. Project Experience: Pinellas County Department of Transportation, Pinellas County, FL — Director of Transportation who oversaw all transportation -related functions including engineering, design, ATMS/ITS, transportation planning, safety, operations, roadway maintenance, sidewalk and the Americans with Disability Act (ADA) programs, access management, right of way (ROW) permitting, roadway and multimodal design activities. Multiple ATMS/ITS Projects, Pinellas County Department of Transportation, Pinellas County, FL — Various project roles and responsibilities for ATMS/ITS projects. Responsibilities included system design, timing plan development, database management, TMC operations, Standard Operating Guideline (SOG) development, contracts, agreements, project management and operations. ATMS/ITS Segments 1 — 3 US 19/SR 60: Project Manager responsible for the implementation of new ATMS/ITS system along two major state arterials in Pinellas County. This included 60 signalized intersections, 48 closed-circuit television (CCTV) cameras, 17 arterial dynamic messaging signals, fiber optic communications network, two central signal operations software programs and two adaptive signal control technology (ASCT) software algorithms. Responsible for securing CMAQ grant funds, scope development, ASCT selection, plans review, integration and testing. • ATMS/ITS Segments 3 — 5: Project Manager responsible for 57 signalized intersections, CCTV cameras, arterial DMS and fiber optic communications. The project included the design and construction of a traffic management center inside a category 5 rated facility. ATMS/ITS Segments 6 —16: Program Development Manager responsible for 217 signalized intersections, 190 CCTV cameras, 42 arterial DMS, and fiber-optic communications network. Segments 6 —13 complete with the remainder under construction or design. Multiple ASCT Projects, Pinellas County, Pinellas County, FL — Implementation of multiple adaptive control software algorithms including OPAC, Rhodes, InSync and Centracs Adaptive. Includes 14 years of experience installing and testing a wide variety of ASCT projects including overseeing the largest ASCT installation in Florida with over 160 intersections along major state and county roadways operating various ASCT programs. KEN JACOBS, TSOS, RSP Firm HNTB Corporation Education Certificate, Architectural Drafting, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, 1978 Credit -Hours, Pre -Engineering, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, 1978 Certifications & Training Public Works Executive Certified Traffic Signal Operations Specialist Certified Roadway Safety Professional Certified Professional Affiliations Institute of Transportation Engineers American Public Works Association Intelligent Transportation Society of America International Municipal Signal Association Hire Date with HNTB February 2021 Years of Experience with other Employers 35 HNTB 23 KEY PERSONNEL EXPERIENCE Thorough understanding of all major ASCT software capabilities and operational characteristics. Provided research and development of the ASCT selection, implementation, evaluation and deployment processes. Served as a site visit location and subject matter expert for United States Department of Transportation ASCT Everyday Counts Program for OPAC and Rhodes. • FDOT InSync Field Test and Evaluation Project: Project included the first installation of InSync ASCT in Florida. Working with FDOT Central Office as Project Manager to install and evaluate performance and reliability of the software to gain state approval on APL. Responsibilities included implementation, integration and evaluation of the system including a before/ after study performed by an independent consultant and submitted to FDOT Central Office as part of the APL Approval process. • ATMS Segments 1 — 5: The project is using OPAC and Rhodes ASCT algorithms along with the installation of ATMS. • Segments 6 — 12: Program Development Manager responsible for the continued implementation of ASCT at the program level. • Segment 7 Centracs Adaptive Pilot Project: Project Manager who installed, operated and provided feedback to the vendor on operational issues and opportunities for improvement of the adaptive algorithm. US 19 Signal Phasing and Timing (SPaT) Challenge Project, Central Office/District 7, FL - Project Manager for Pinellas County SPaT Challenge pilot project. Responsibilities included the installation of connected vehicle (CV) communication along US 19 at 23 intersections including 11 at grade intersections and 12 grade -separated intersections. This included the first installation of C-V2X RSU communications in Florida. Responsible for project oversight, hardware installation and testing. Multiple Multimodal Projects, Pinellas County Public Works, Pinellas County, FL • Belleair Road Feasibility Study: Program Manager to develop needs assessment process to incorporate multimodal review into existing resurfacing, restoration and rehabilitation process. The project included conceptual design of all roadway, drainage and multimodal needs along the two-lane undivided roadway. Multimodal components included safe speed for all users, sidewalk network, multi -use trail and bike lane considerations. Responsible for developing scope, process and overseeing project deliverables. • FDOT District 7 Tri-County Trail Design -Build Project: Project Team responsible for the $4.2 million grant received by Pinellas County for construction of a five -mile trail segment along Keystone Road and through Brooker Creek Preserve. • North Loop Trail Design -Build Project: Project Manager for initial grant submittal process and development of design -build criteria package. The project connects two existing trail segments and completes the northern six -mile segment of a countywide trail loop. Contract awarded in 2019 and is still under construction. HNTB KEN JACOBS, TSOS, RSP 24 KEY PERSONNEL EXPERIENCE CHRIS KUZLO, PE Drainage and Permitting Chris Kuzlo has 15 years of experience in the drainage field. His experience includes stormwater pond design, storm drain design, ditch design, cross drain design, bridge hydraulics design, floodplain compensation design and watershed model development. Chris has extensive experience with the Environmental Resource Permit (ERP) regulatory program. Chris co-authored the University of Central Florida's Stormwater Management Academy's BMPTRAINS Model. He is proficient in the use of ICPR, HEC-RAS, HY-8, HC SWMM, PONDS, MODRET, ASAD, ArcGIS and Microsoft Office. CHRIS KUZLO, PE Project Experience: Firm Eleven Bridge Replacements Project, County Roads 846 and 858, Collier County, FL — HNTB Corporation Stormwater Engineer -of -Record for this project to replace eleven bridge structures. Education Responsible for the bridge hydraulics analysis using HEC-RAS with permitting through the B.S., Civil Engineering University of South South Florida Water Management District and USACE. Florida, 2007 Golden Gate Estates Bridges Project Development and Environment (PD&E) Study, Professional Registrations Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) District 1, Collier County, FL — Stormwater Professional Engineer: Engineer for this PD&E study for the evaluation of bridge construction, road widening and FL, 2012 (75460) sidewalk placement along nine miles of 8th Street NE from Golden Gate Boulevard to Randal Boulevard, 16th Street NE from Golden Gate Boulevard to Randal Boulevard, and 47th Professional Affiliations Avenue NE from Immokalee Road to Everglades Boulevard. American Society of Civil Engineers SR 60 from Valrico Road to the east of Dover Road, FDOT District 7, Hillsborough Hire Date with HNTB County, FL — Stormwater Engineer -of -Record for this project to add lanes and widen a four- August 2014 lane divided facility to a six -lane divided facility with bike lanes on the paved shoulders. The project included the update and conversion of the existing Hillsborough County Stormwater Years of Experience with Management Model (SWMM) and associated GIS database. Drainage Engineer -of -Record other Employers responsible for the pond sitting and floodplain analysis of four basins, with permitting through 8 the Southwest Florida Water Management District (SWFWMD) and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). SR 52 (Schrader Highway) from US 411SR 45 to CR 5811Bellamy Brothers Boulevard, FDOT District 7, Pasco County, FL — Stormwater Engineer responsible for pond siting and floodplain analysis, bridge hydraulic analysis and permitting through the SWFWMD and USACE for this nine -mile project that added lanes and reconstructed a two-lane undivided facility to a four -lane divided facility with bike lanes on the paved shoulders and a shared -use path within the right of way. The project included GIS analysis of the horizontal and vertical flood rise within SWFWMD's Conner Preserve to demonstrate no adverse impacts and an innovative idea of using flood rights within the Old Florida Mitigation Bank to minimize right-of- way acquisition for floodplain compensation. SR 700 (US 98) from CSX Railroad to SR 70, FDOT District 1, Okeechobee County, FL — Stormwater Engineer -of -Record responsible for the flooding complaint investigation and drainage remediation design for the frequent roadway flooding along SR 700. Services include determination of factors contributing to the flooding, evaluation of feasible remediation solutions and design of the preferred remediation alternative. SR 75 (US 231) PD&E Study from SR 30A (US 98) to SR 20, FDOT District 3, Bay County, FL — Stormwater FOR for this PD&E study for the evaluation of widening from four - lane to six -lane facility for approximately 24 miles of highway. The study also includes the HNTB 25 KEY PERSONNEL EXPERIENCE evaluation of bicycle and pedestrian improvements. Responsible for the bridge hydraulics analysis on three bridges and two bridge culverts using HEC-RAS with HEC-GeoRAS. CR 578 (County Line Road) from the Suncoast to US 41, FDOT District 7, Hernando County, FL — Stormwater Engineer for the new alignment of CR 578 consisting of a divided four -lane suburban section. The ultimate section is a divided six -lane urban section. Responsibilities include stormwater management and storm drain analysis, pond siting analysis and plans production with permitting through SWFWMD and USACE. 1-751SR 56 Interchange from east of CR 54 to West of Cypress Ridge Boulevard, FDOT District 7, Pasco County, FL — Stormwater Engineer for this interchange improvements project to reconfigure the existing standard diamond interchange to a diverging diamond interchange with widening along SR 56. The stormwater design retrofit the existing ponds and accommodate the proposed improvement. Responsible for pond siting analysis, pond design, storm drain design, and ditch design with permitting through SWFWMD and USACE. Tampa Bay Next (TB Next) Owner's Representative, FDOT, District 7, Tampa, FL — Stormwater Engineer for the District's TB Next interstate modernization program including 80 miles of express lanes. Responsible for the drainage technical review and comment on the preliminary engineering plans, drainage design documentation, and permit documents, and support concept development, right-of-way (ROW), and design -build RFP development and procurement. Assisted FDOT District 7 with the permitting of the Howard Frankland bridge replacement which relied on the Old Tampa Bay Water Quality improvement stormwater quality credits as opposed to utilizing the traditional stormwater ponds. Responsible for identifying the additional opportunities within the program to eliminate the need for stormwater ponds based on utilizing the Old Tampa Bay Water Quality improvement project credits. Also, responsible for identifying and analyzing two regional stormwater management opportunities for a section of 1-275 in Pinellas County (TB Next Section 2) which resulted in the elimination of six off -site stormwater management ponds and associated ROW takes. Reformed multiple ROW -related assignments such as National Stormwater Trust (NST) inquiries regarding the potential of surplus stormwater management volume lease as well as assisting District 7 with evaluating their ability to surplus properties. Districtwide Drainage Support Consultant, FDOT District 1, Districtwide, FL — Stormwater Engineer responsible for stormwater management studies, analyses and design in support of the FDOT District's work program and drainage unit. Services include task work order development for scope/fee/schedules, subconsultant coordination, investigation of flooding complaints, stormwater analysis, stormwater management design and stormwater management design review. SR 60 from Valrico Road to East of Dover Road, FDOT District 7, Hillsborough County, FL — Stormwater Engineer of Record (EOR) for this project to widen a four -lane divided facility to a six -lane divided facility with bike lanes on the paved shoulders. Responsible for the pond siting analysis, stormwater management design, floodplain compensation design and storm drain design with permitting through the Southwest Florida Water Management District (SWFWMD) and United States Army Core of Engineers (USACE). The project included the update and conversion of the existing Hillsborough County Alafia River SWMM model and associated GIS database. The model was converted to a regional Green-Ampt based Interconnected Channel and Pond Routing model which was verified against field observations and used for the roadway profilelfloodplain compensation design within a major depressional low traversed by SR 60. CHRIS KUZLO, PE HNTB IPW KEY PERSONNEL EXPERIENCE GOVARDHAN MUTHYALAGARI, PE, PTOE Planning/Traffic Lead Govardhan Muthyalagari serves as a project manager in the HNTB's Tampa office with more than 19 years of experience. He has completed numerous modeling and traffic studies, including arterial and intersection operations and safety studies, signal warrant studies, signal retiming studies. Additionally, he is responsible for traffic analyses, comprehensive planning and project development and environment (PD&E) studies. His experience includes site impact analysis, transit planning, transportation planning/modeling, transportation impact fees, concurrency management and environmental justice. His areas of expertise include modeling (Travel demand as well as micro -simulation), transit planning, PD&E, sub-area/corridor studies, including interstate systems planning to intersection operations and safety studies. He has extensively used the FDOT's D1, D3 and D7 regional models and has experience coordinating with various Regional Planning Councils (RPC's) for these efforts. Govard han is proficient in the use of transportation and traffic modeling software applications, such as CUBE, FSUTMS, Highway Capacity Software, ARTPLAN, HIGHPLAN, FREEPLAN, Corsim, Synchro, SimTraffic and Arc View 8.0. Project Experience: Fowler Avenue/Metro Parkway PD&E Re -Evaluation, FDOT District 1, Districtwide, FL — Traffic Lead responsible for the re-evaluation of the previously approved PD&E study for Metro Parkway from US 41 (SR 45) at Alico Road to SR 82 (Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Boulevard). The focus of the feasibility study was within Segments 3 and 4 of the PD&E study, from Winkler Street to SR 82 (Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Boulevard), along Evans Avenue and Fowler Street. Provided engineering, environmental and planning support to evaluate if the one-way pair concept for Fowler Street and Evans Avenue was the most viable concept. General Engineering Contract (GEC), FDOT District 3, Tampa, FL — Traffic Analysis Lead assisting the Environmental Management Office with tasks including review of all of the traffic tasks including travel demand modeling and traffic forecasting, including interstates, arterial and intersection operations and safety and quality assurance/quality control review efforts. HNTB is providing comprehensive engineering services to the District. HNTB's primary roles include assisting in the delivery of projects, outlining key project features and requirements for preliminary concept reports, developing contract scope of service and serving as project managers to efficiently deliver the work program. GEC, Tampa Hillsborough County Expressway Authority (THEA), Tampa, FL — Traffic Engineering Advisor to THEA on various projects and assignments as part of general engineering services. Some of the projects included the Gandy Connector State Environmental Impact Report, THEA Downtown Traffic Study and Selmon East-West Study. Owner's Representative, Tampa Bay Next (TB NEXT), FDOT District 7, Hillsborough, Polk and Pinellas Counties, FL — Traffic Engineer responsible for traffic forecasting, scenario modeling, cost estimates, conceptual plans, ramp metering analysis and design and express lane planning. The program consists of multimodal solutions for the Tampa Bay Region on State Road 60, 1-275, 1-4, 1-75 and all feeder facilities. This Owner's Representative contract provides comprehensive program management of managed lanes on 1-4, 1-75, Veterans Expressway and 1-275 in the Tampa Bay area. The program also covers integration of multimodal transportation projects, local road system enhancements and complete streets implementation. GOVARDHAN MUTHYALAGARI, PE, PTOE Firm HNTB Corporation Education M.S., Civil Engineering University of South Florida, 2001 Bachelor of Technology, Civil Engineering Indian Institute of Technology, India, 1999 Professional Registrations Professional Engineer: FL, 2001 (65474) Professional Traffic Operations Engineer, 2007 Professional Affiliations Institute of Transportation Engineers Tampa Bay ITE American Planning Association Hire Date with HNTB October 2001 Years of Experience with other Employers 0 HNTB 27 KEY PERSONNEL EXPERIENCE Transportation Task Force (TTF) PMC, Hillsborough County, FL — Project Manager responsible for overseeing several consultants in support of the $30 million intersection improvement program. Was responsible for the validation and prioritization of the entire $500 million program during the pre -design phase. Lead reviewer for all traffic engineering aspects during the design phase. In addition, served as a liaison with FDOT District 7, the City of Tampa, the City of Temple Terrace and the Hillsborough Area Regional Transit Authority (HART). The TTF Program provided infrastructure improvements for safety and traffic operations and reduced congestion for motorists, bicyclists and pedestrians. Improvements included roadway widening, intersections, new signals, transit and Advanced Traffic Management Systems (ATMS). Big Bend Road PD&E Study, Hillsborough County, Tampa, FL — Project Manager and Traffic Lead for the widening of Big Bend Road (CR 674), a strategic intermodal system (SIS) connector, from four to six lanes, as well as operational improvements to the 1-75/Big Bend Road Interchange. The study involved extensive coordination with the Hillsborough County School Board, local developers, FDOT District 7 and the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). The study also required coordination with the 1-75 South Corridor PD&E, an interchange modification report (IMR) and the design and evaluation of alternatives within the project limits. Also, Old Big Bend Road was evaluated for minor operational improvements due to its proposed realignment at the 1-75 and Big Bend Road Interchange, as part of the 1-75 South Corridor PD&E. US 231 PD&E Study from South of US 98 to SR 20, FDOT District 3, Bay County, FL — Traffic Lead for the US 231 PD&E study from south of US 98 to SR 20 performing traffic analyses and planning in support of the PD&E study utilizing SYNCHRO and HCS. This study will serve to establish the location and design concepts for improving the capacity of US 231 within the above referenced limits. Apart from identifying all the needed improvements at various intersections, coordination with West Bay Parkway PD&E, Gulf Coast Parkway PD&E and various stakeholders was key to the project's success. 1-4 PD&E Study from east of 50th Street to Polk Parkway, FDOT District 7, Hillsborough County, FL — Task Lead performing detailed operational and micro -simulation traffic analyses and planning in support of the managed lanes feasibility study and PD&E study for the segment of 1-4 from east of 50th street to Polk Parkway approximately 24 miles. This study will serve to establish the location and design concepts for improving the capacity of 1-4 within the above -referenced limits. Also, provided preliminary traffic analysis during the master planning stage of the PD&E study to develop initial starter and long-term project concepts. US 27 from North of Ritchie Road to Barry Road, FDOT District 1, Davenport, FL — Task Lead performing detailed operational and micro -simulation traffic analyses and planning in support of the proposed widening of US 27 from a four to six lane arterial roadway. Multiple intersection operational analysis and proposed improvements were also undertaken as a part of this project. SR 559 Interchange Operation Analysis Report (IOAR) and PD&E Re -Evaluation, FDOT District 1, Polk County, FL — Task Lead for this study that involved completing an IOAR and a PD&E re-evaluation for the SR 559 interchange in Polk County. Coordination took place with FDOT District 1 to examine the level of effort previously completed for the Florida High -Speed Rail and previous 1-4 Master Plan and PD&E. Due to coordination with FDOT. GOVARDHAN MUTHYALAGARI, PE, PTOE HNTB P KEY PERSONNEL EXPERIENCE BEN RODGERS,PE TSM&OIITS Ben Rodgers has accumulated 14 years of experience in the traffic engineering field in both the public and private sectors. His experience includes the design and plans development of signals, signing and pavement markings, and intelligent transportation systems. Project Experience: Forest Lakes Boulevard Signalization and Signing and Pavement Markings, Pinellas County, FL — Design Engineer assisting in the traffic design of this 1.5-mile widening project. The signalization design of this project consisted of upgrading two signals with mast arms, internally illuminated street name signs, video detection and interconnect. The design of the signing and pavement markings included new bike lanes and additional advance street name signs. Fowler Avenue Signing and Pavement Markings, FDOT District 7, Tampa, FL — Lead Traffic Designer for the signing and pavement markings design along this 1.6-mile-long project corridor. This project introduced a pilot safety concept for buffered bike lanes. Analysis in AutoTURN was also performed to accommodate truck traffic throughout the corridor. Gulf Boulevard Signing and Pavement Markings, FDOT District 7, Pinellas County, FL — Lead Traffic Designer for the signing and pavement markings design along this 2.5 mile long project corridor. The design included the addition of several new advanced street name signs and improved safety features including new crosswalks with rapid rectangular flashing beacons (RRFB). With the restricted area of right of way available throughout the corridor, extensive subsurface utility engineering work and coordination efforts were required. Advanced Transportation Management System Project, Pinellas County, FL — Engineer assisting the FOR in the design of this project for Pinellas County Public Works. The design of this stand-alone ITS project consists of adding three new dynamic message signs, 24 new closed circuit television cameras and additional interconnect with fiber optic cable. Throughout this project there was extensive coordination with utilities, right of way and environmental impacts. Ayers Road and Trillium Boulevard, Hernando County, FL — Engineer for this project using AGi32 to design the lighting at a new signal. Lighting was designed at the intersection and all approaches. Completed a Lighting Analysis Report, with electrical design as part of this project. Pinellas County Maintenance ITS Districtwide Consulting Contract, Pinellas County, FL — Engineer/Project Manager assisting the County with various tasks for this contract such as the Gulf Boulevard ATMS project and FM Radio Tower I Transmitter Installation project. The Gulf Boulevard ATMS included the installation of 14 dynamic message signs, 19 closed-circuit television cameras, 22 signals, and interconnect installation. Throughout this project, there was extensive coordination with utilities, right of way, and environmental agencies. ITS Districtwide Consulting Contract, FDOT District 7, Districtwide, FL — Engineer assisting the District with various tasks performing engineering and project management work. The tasks have included scope development, ramp signal suitability study, wrong -way detection systems engineering management plan, surge suppression and grounding remediation study, and ITSFM implementation. Continuous Service Contract (Traffic Operations), FDOT District 1, Bartow, FL — Project Engineer providing full time in-house support for the FDOT D1 Safety Office. Assisted the Department with concept plans, estimates, safety study quality control (QC), plans QC, crash report summaries, safety recommendations, RSAs, scoping, task work orders, contract management, and preparing projects for DBPB. BEN RODGERS, PE Firm HNTB Corporation Education B.S., Civil Engineering, Florida State University, 2009 Professional Registrations Professional Engineer: FL, 2016, (#80350) Certifications & Training Earthwork I Earthwork II QC Manager Advanced MOT Specifications Package Training ITSFM Editor (FDOT D1 & D7) Professional Affiliations Tampa Bay ITE Hire Date with HNTB September 2017 Years of Experience with other Employers 10 HNTB KEY PERSONNEL EXPERIENCE Safety Studies, FDOT District 1, Districtwide, FL — Engineer preparing safety studies. The studies involve making safety recommendations based on researching crash history and field observations. General Engineering Consultant (GEC), Tampa Hillsborough Expressway Authority, Hillsborough County, FL — Engineer providing traffic engineering support on various projects to the Authority. The work on this contract has included assisting with plans review and other miscellaneous technical support for signals, signing and pavement markings, lighting and ITS. Projects worked on through this contract have included the Selmon Expressway Gandy West Extension, Selmon Expressway South project, Reversible Express Lanes Aesthetic Lighting project, Brandon Medical light pole relocation and Meridian Street light pole relocation. SR 60 from Valrico Road to East of Dover Road, Brandon, FL — Engineer assisting the traffic design engineer of record (EOR) with the quality assurance/quality control on this road widening project. The signing and pavement marking plans included new advance street name signs and 2.4 miles of pavement markings accommodating two new travel lanes. The signalization plans included 5 new signals upgraded from diagonal span to box span, new interconnect between signals and new internally illuminated street name signs. GEC, Florida's Turnpike Enterprise (FTE), Ocoee, FL — Engineer providing traffic engineering support to FTE. The work on this contract has been assisting in lighting design, signing design and permitting with the Federal Aviation Administration on the SR 60 Operational Improvements project. Southwest Bus Rapid Transit Project, Jacksonville, FL — Engineer assisting the FOR in the design of this project for the Jacksonville Transportation Authority. The project consists of designing a new fiber optic cable network and proposing ITS equipment for new bus stops. The work on the project also included the lighting plans to illuminate the new bus stops, which included photometric and electrical design. Central Office Support, FDOT, Statewide, FL — Engineer assisting with plans development for emergency shoulder use plans in preparation of emergency evacuation. Engineer for the sign analysis and design for freight vehicles. Also prepared plans for green bike lanes. 1-4 Fog/Low Visibility Detection System Design/Build, FDOT District 1, Polk County, FL — Engineer of Record for this project across 17 miles of 1-4. The intelligent transportation system infrastructure on this project includes the replacement of 4 dynamic message signs, 12 thermal CCTV cameras, 11 road weather information system units, and 58 flashing beacon signs. Also included were all integration and programming of the SunGuide software system and device response plan configuration. ITS Maintenance Contract, FDOT District 1, Districtwide, FL — Engineer assisting the District with the implementation of ITSFM, locating utilities in Sunshine 811, and managing ITS parts inventory. As an ITSFM editor, he imported fiber splicing networks, electrical networks, conduits, ITS devices, cabinet parts, and various other attributes. Tampa International Airport Curbside Expansion, Tampa, FL — Lighting Engineer for the project. This project consisted of adding new light poles and conduit for new curbside pickup lanes for the Tampa International Airport. Analysis was done in AGi32 and there was coordination with TECO throughout the project. Tampa Bay Next (TB Next) Owner's Representative, Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT), District 7, Tampa, FL — Engineer providing traffic design support to the Department. The work on this contract has included developing conceptual line diagrams for ingress/egress access points and toll gantry locations for future express lanes. Other work has included creating concepts such as master signing plans with use of GuideSign. BEN RODGERS, PE HNTB 30 KEY PERSONNEL EXPERIENCE MICHELLE RUTISHAUSER NEPA Re-evaluation/Environmental Sciences Lead Michelle Rutishauser is an environmental scientist with 18 years of experience in environmental consulting. Michelle's experience includes Environmental Resource Permit (ERP) and Section 404 permitting, ecological and hydrological assessments, threatened and endangered species surveys, relocation, and Section 7 Consultations: and the preparation of National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) documents. Additionally, Michelle's expertise includes geographic information system (GIS) analysis including habitat mapping, spatial editing and analysis and aerial photo interpretation. MICHELLE RUTISHAUSER Project Experience: Firm Golden Gate Estates Bridges, Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) District 1, HNTB Corporation Collier County, FL — Environmental Lead for the PD&E study to evaluate three new bridge Education crossings over Golden Gate Main Canal and Cypress Canal to add connectivity to dead-end B.S., Biology, University of South Florida, streets at 8th Street NE, 16th Street NE and 47th Avenue NE within the Golden Gate Estates. 2007 Roadway improvements and sidewalks were also evaluated in the study. Work included the Masters Certificate, Wetlands and Water completion of a Wetland Evaluation Report (WER), Endangered Species Biological Resource Management, University of Florida, Assessment (ESBA) and Florida panther Biological Assessment (BA) and form Section 7 2015 Consultation with USFWS. Evaluated wetlands and surface waters within project limits, performed protected species survey and Panther Habitat Unit (PHU) calculations. Certifications & Training Florida Department of Environmental SR 75 (US 231) From SR 30A (US 98) to SR 20 PD&E, FDOT District 3, Bay County, FL — Protection Qualified Stormwater Management Environmental Scientist for the PD&E of this critical north/south roadway which services as a Inspector primary hurricane evacuation route. The purpose of the PD&E is to determine the feasibility of Spec al dric oils Specialized Training for Wetland ists widening SR 75 (US 231) from four to six lanes throughout the project limits while improving FDEP Wetland Delineation Course the safety and level of service (LOS). Efforts for this project included preparing a Wetland Grass & Sedge Identification Workshop Evaluation and Biological Assessment Report (WEBAR) for the over 20-mile corridor including GIS Workshop wetland assessments of all systems within 300-feet of the project right of way, conducting SFWMD Wetland Assessment Method protected species surveys including gopher tortoise surveys, performing Panama City crayfish P P Y 99 P Y �P 9 Y Y� Workshop dip -net surveys and protected plant species pedestrian surveys. The class of action is a State Professional Affiliations Environmental Impact Report (SEIR). Tampa Bay Association of Environmental SR 60 from Valrico Road to Dover Road, FDOT District 7, Tampa, FL — Environmental Professionals Society of Wetland Scientists Scientist for the widening of SR60 from Valrico Road to 2000 feet east of Dover Road, 2.408 miles. The existing roadway is a four -lane, rural divided facility and the proposed Hire Date with HNTB improvements are a six -lane high speed urban typical section divided by a 30-foot raised September 2012 grass median. Additionally, four proposed stormwater management facilities and two floodplain compensation sites will be required. As the Environmental Lead, delineated Years of Experience with other Employers wetlands, and surface waters within the project limits in accordance with state and federal 9 rules; performed an environmental assessment of proposed pond sites and floodplain compensation areas; and preparation of the ERP environmental documentation. Lakeland Area Alternatives Analysis PD&E, FDOT District 1, Polk County, FL — Environmental Lead for this feasibility/PD&E study that focuses on providing a clear Planning to Environmental Linkage (PEL) to determine a multi -modal approach for improved transportation planning throughout the northern portion of Lakeland. Innovative data collection and project approaches are being utilized throughout this study. 1-4 Express Lanes PD&E, FDOT District 7, Hillsborough and Polk Counties, FL — Environmental Scientist for this study to determine the need for managed lane improvements along 1-4 from east of 50th Street to Polk Parkway in Hillsborough and Polk Counties, a HNTB 31 KEY PERSONNEL EXPERIENCE distance of approximately 21 miles. It includes the coordination with the proposed managed lanes from the I-275 downtown Tampa interchange area to just east of 50th Street and the I- 411-75 interchange connection. As the environmental lead, prepared the Wetland and Biological Assessment Report (WEBAR) which included conducting wetland assessments of all systems within 300 feet of the project right of way, conducted protected species surveys including scrub -jay callback surveys, sand and blue -tailed mole skink pedestrian surveys, gopher tortoise surveys and federally protected plant surveys. Big Bend Road PUE Study, Hillsborough County, Tampa, FL — Environmental Lead for the widening of Big Bend Road (CR 674), a Strategic Intermodal System (SIS) Connector, from four to six lanes, approximately 1.6 miles in length, as well as operational improvements to the I-751Big Bend Road interchange. The study involves extensive coordination with the Hillsborough County School Board, local developers, and FDOT District 7. Responsible for analyzing the corridor to complete the Preliminary Environmental Discussion (PED) for the Advanced Notification process for the ETDM Programming Screening; completing an assessment of the project corridor and 300-foot buffer for all environmental elements including wetlands, protected species and Section 4(f) involvement; completing the Natural Resource Evaluation (NRE) report. Bruce B. Downs Boulevard Roadway Improvement Project, Hillsborough, Hillsborough County, FL — Environmental Scientist for the widening of 4.8 miles of urban roadway. The project is divided into three segments with three different design consultants. Conducted ArcMap GIS mapping and analysis of roadway and mitigation areas, wetland delineation in accordance with the state and federal rules, performed a UMAM analysis for wetland impacts and mitigation, protected wildlife surveys, performed permitting and relocation of gopher tortoise in accordance with the FWC guidelines, prepared the environmental documentation of the ERP, identified off -site mitigation parcels, created habitat restoration plans for mitigation areas and prepared mitigation management plans. Waters Avenue from Sheldon Road to Florida Avenue, Hillsborough County, FL — Environmental Lead for the development of a Preliminary Engineering Report and Pedestrian and Bicycle Activity Study along 7.5 miles of Waters Avenue, which included widening options to add bicycle lanes and an assessment of Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and access management issues along the corridor. This resulted in two intersection improvement projects at Savarese Circle and Armenia Avenue as well as the restriping of Waters Avenue from Pinehurst Drive to Dale Mabry Highway. Prepared Environmental Technical Memorandum and Hazardous Materials Technical Memorandums. Performed Department of State and State Historic Preservation research, Protected Species Analyses and ArcMap GIS research. EMO Districtwide Contract, FDOT District 1, Countywide, FL — Project Manager responsible for augmenting District staff to assist with management of PD&E projects, feasibility studies, review of PD&E documents including reevaluations, technical support documents and public involvement materials. Additional responsibilities include review of minor project documentation, phase reviews for design and review of Local Agency Program NEPA documents, completion of field reviews, and Section 4(f) coordination. Also responsible for the completion of invoicing, reporting and financial tracking of the contract. MICHELLE RUTISHAUSER HNTB 32 KEY PERSONNEL EXPERIENCE SHAWN STOVER, PE Project Quality Manager Shawn Stover has provided project management, multi -modal transportation planning, engineering design, estimating, plan preparation and construction administration services for all types of transportation projects including state and interstate highways, interchanges, rural and urban arterials, and collector and residential streets, as well as planning studies for corridor renewal. Shawn has also been responsible for design team/departmental management and has extensive experience with project management and daily controls. He has experience with understanding the complete project development process from conceptual development through construction including working with local stakeholders and SHAWN STOVER, PE decision -makers on implementation needs and processes. Firm Project Experience: HNTB Corporation Forest Lakes Boulevard from West of Pine Avenue to West of Racetrack Road, Pinellas Education County, Oldsmar, FL — Quality Reviewer of a roadway plan package for the widening of a B.S., Civil Engineering, University of Kansas, two-lane suburban roadway to a four -lane suburban facility with provisions for a six -lane urban 1989 ultimate typical. This involves the installation of a new underground drainage system and underdrains. Professional Registrations Professional Engineer: SR 60 from Valrico Road to Dover Road, Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) FL 2016, (#80967) District 7, Hillsborough County, FL — Engineering Project Manager with duties which TX 2011, (#109251) include oversight of all engineering related activities for this reconstruction project along 2.5- KS 1993 (#12897) miles of SR 60 in Hillsborough County. Plans detail the widening and reconstruction of the MO1994, (#E-26852) existing roadway from a four -lane urban roadway to a six -lane median separated urban Professional Affiliations roadway with curb and gutter, enclosed storm sewer system and traffic signals. The project American Public Works Association (APWA) required substantial coordination with multiple utility companies and with CSX Railroad was to facilitate the design of the proposed improvements. Hire Date with HNTB June 2005 SR 52 from US 411SR 45 to CR 581, FDOT District 7, Pasco County, FL — Engineering Project Manager which includes oversight duties of all engineering related activities for this Years of Experience with reconstruction project along 9- miles of SR 52 in Pasco County. A two-lane rural roadway will other Firms be reconstructed to a four -lane divided rural roadway with a provision for a future six -lane 30 build -out. Stormwater management facilities, floodplain compensation sites and wetland impacts were designed for the ultimate six -lane build -out and permitted through Southwest Florida Water Management District and US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). Big Bend Road PD&E Study, Hillsborough County, Tampa, FL — Contract Manager and Engineering Advisor for the widening of Big Bend Road (CR 672), a strategic intermodal system (SIS) connector, from four to six lanes, as well as operational improvements to the I- 751Big Bend Road interchange. The study involves extensive coordination with the Hillsborough County School Board, local developers, Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) District 7, the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and with the 1-75 South Corridor PD&E project. Miscellaneous Professional Services for Engineering Services, Hillsborough County, Tampa, FL — Contract and Project Manager on this project which includes multiple design and plan production work orders for a variety of infrastructure improvement projects including resurfacing projects, traffic signal and intersection reconfiguration projects, and project development and environment (PD&E) studies. HNTB 33 KEY PERSONNEL EXPERIENCE 1- 35 General Engineering Consultant, Texas Department of Transportation Department (TxDOT), Hays, Travis and Williamson Counties (Austin District), TX— Project Coordinator for multiple mobility assessment and improvement projects for more than 65- miles of IH 35. Responsibilities included overseeing the development of stand-alone National Environmental Policy Act, schematic and Plans, Specific and Estimate projects/activities for segment engineers and subconsultants assigned to diver's disciplines and projects at various locations throughout the corridor. Responsible for the coordination with stakeholders including TxDOT and local cities. Responsibilities also included overseeing corridor survey, environmental constraints mapping, public outreach, traffic and operational analysis, engineering feasibility analysis for the main lane, frontage road and cross street improvements, managed lane assessment and bicycle and pedestrian improvements. The program utilized corridor -wide controls and standards that included a master schedule and master MicroStation format. Belton/Salado Construction Engineering and Inspection (CEI) Services, TxDOT, Austin and Waco, TX — Project Manager for CEI services to improve two sections of IH 35 (6.5- miles) in the Waco District. The contract included the section of IH 35 from FM 2843 to FM 2484, referenced as Section 1 B and the section beginning at the North end of 1 B continuing North to US 190, referenced as Section 1 C. These projects completely reconstructed 1-35 to a six -lane freeway with continuous frontage roads. It included 17 main lane and frontage road structures and a direct connect structure from 1- 35 to US 190. The project included the addition of a center concrete median, concrete and asphalt pavements, retaining walls, drainage, signalization, illumination and other miscellaneous items as well as managed a fifteen -person staff. Justin Lane Reconstruction Improvements Burnet Road to Lamar Boulevard, City of Austin, Austin, TX — HNTB was tasked with the design of the reconstruction of approximately 5,400-feet of major collector roadway. The project consists of full -depth pavement reconstruction, spot curb and gutter reconstruction, upgrading existing sidewalk to be Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) compliant and an enclosed storm sewer system within the project limits. The project also included the design of a new 12-inch water line for the length of the project (6,500-feet). The water line design consists of horizontal and vertical alignment, connections to approximately 118 service connections to adjacent residences. Project Manager who provided complete oversight of the design and quality control of the project team. Provided direct oversight for scope development and project deliverables and ensured that appropriate disciplines and resources are assigned to the project to deliver quality work. Managed and coordinated the work of HNTB's subconsultants, including review of billing invoices to ensure that subconsultants are paid in a timely manner. Communicated frequently with the city project manager to report on the progress of the project and to identify issues that need attention in order to keep the project moving forward. SHAWN STOVER, PE H NTB 34 KEY PERSONNEL EXPERIENCE JORGE UY, PE, PTOE, RSP-1 TSM&OIITS Jorge Uy is a Senior Project Engineer in the transportation group with 9.5 years of experience in Pavement Management Programs and Safety Improvement Projects for local municipalities Working in the Pavement Management Programs, he has managed consultants in data collection, performed pavement analysis, assessed the findings to develop a pavement management plan or capital improvements project list, managed neighborhood resurfacing projects and led public and educational outreach plans. In addition, he developed, managed and provided technical specifications for pavement resurfacing programs to include asphalt, brick, unimproved Right of Way (ROW), paving, striping reflectivity, pavement preservation practices, traffic signs, Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) accessibility and markings contracts. Additionally, Jorge performed lead roles on multiple Safety Improvement Projects (SIP) for the City of Tampa and Sumter County, FL. These SIP projects entailed designing median openings, ADA transition plans, resurfacing and traffic calming projects as well overseeing corridor re -design and improving pedestrian commutes. PROJECT EXPERIENCE Multiple SIPs, City of Tampa, Tampa, FL — Project Manager for multiple projects for the City of Tampa to include overseeing the corridor re -design on E. Davis Blvd. between W. Davis Blvd. to Davis Blvd. Project design for this project included "main-streeting" the commercial section of E. Davis Blvd. between Barbados and Chesapeake to have angled parking, valley gutters, shared bike lanes and raised intersections. Responsibilities for the Hampton Terrance and Ridgewood Park Neighborhood Resurfacing and Traffic Calming projects include developing resurfacing plans in addition to performing a community outreach survey on traffic calming recommendations. The survey led to designing a neighborhood wide traffic calming based on community input. Other relevant projects include the Habana and Hillsborough Median Improvements, Harbour Island Complete Streets, Cross Creek Access Management Improvements, ADA Transition Plan and the Highway Safety Improvement Program Downtown Improvement Analysis. These projects entailed access management improvements, improved pedestrian commute, designing a median opening, managing the city's ADA transition plan in addition to the city's downtown corridor analysis. Multiple SIPs, Sumter County, Bushnell, FL — Project Manager for multiple projects in Sumter County, FL responsible for the CR 470 Corridor Improvement which entailed developing signs and marking plans to reduce rear -end collisions by transforming a bi- directional, four -lane road into two thru lanes and a two-way left -turn lane. In addition, the design added a raised concrete barrier for a pedestrian crosswalk with High -Intensity Activated crosswalk flashers. The Advanced Traffic Management System (ATMS) program involved managing the county's ATMS program and design which aims to upgrade current signals, deploy closed-circuit television cameras, implement detection systems and install emergency pre-emption devices. The project construction was funded through the County's Incentive Grant Program. Accountable for the management of the countywide safety improvements of the County's Community Traffic Safety Team (CTST) program. The goal of the CTST is to reduce the number of traffic crashes, fatalities and the number and severity of injuries by incorporating the 4 E's of traffic safety: Engineering, Enforcement, Education and Emergency Service. Principal -In -Charge for the W C 478 from US 301 to SR 471 and SR 471 to C-48 SCOP projects, in charge of supervising the staff who managed the safety improvements. These safety improvements included adding shoulder, in -ground rumble strips and improving signage along curved portions of the corridor. Sumter County's Pavement Management Program, Sumter County Board of County Commissioners (BOCC), Bushnell, FL — Assistant Public Works Director responsible for leading Sumter County's Pavement Management Program which spans 837 centerline miles of roads while performing automated Pavement Condition Index (PCI) inspections and developing the criteria for capital improvement and preventative road projects. Developed the County's Sidewalk Master Plan using ArcGIS to record inventory of existing sidewalks proposed policies JORGE UY, PE, PTOE, RSP-1 Firm HNTB Corporation Education M.E., Transportation, University of Florida Graduate School, Gainesville, FL, 2011 B.S., Civil Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, 2009 Professional Registrations Professional Engineer: FL, 2014, (#77634) Professional Traffic Operations Engineer: 2020 Road Safety Professional RSP -1: 2021 Certifications & Training Accela, ArcGIS & AutoCAD Autodesk Inventor Cityworks CNC Programming CORSIM CUBE Voyager GeoPAK HCS+ MathCAD MATLAB Maple Programming MicroPAVER PASSER Pro/Engineering SPSS Software T3D TRANSYT-7F Professional Affiliations American Public Works Association (APWA) American Society of City Engineers (ASCE) University of FL Institute of Transportation Engineers (UF-ITE) Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Hire Date with HNTB March 2020 Years of Experience with other Firms 10 HNTB 35 KEY PERSONNEL EXPERIENCE and procedures for new paths and upgrading of existing infrastructure to meet the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) standards for sidewalks and curb ramps. Sumter County's Stormwater Program Manager, Sumter County Board of County Commissioners (BOCC), Bushnell, FL — Assistant Public Works Director responsible for developing the county's stormwater master plan and managing watershed basin studies, rolling out best management practices, analyzing the level of service criteria, promoting public and educational outreach, reviewing ICPR, hydraulic and hydrology models adhering to Department of Environmental Protection requirements for Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) permits performing environmental resource permit reviews and providing assistance to neighboring cities. Sumter County's Advanced Traffic Management Systems Program Manager, Sumter County Board of County Commissioners (BOCC), Bushnell, FL — Assistant Public Works Director responsible for implementing the County's Master Plan using the County Incentive Grant Program (CIGP) funding to construct Sumter's Traffic Management Center while also providing connectivity to the County's 39 existing traffic signals and coordinating with the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) Systems Management and Operations (TSM&O) projects to help ensure a unified approach in execution methods. Managed a team in the engineering review and design scope of roadway improvement projects, signs, marking upgrades, pedestrian safety, pavement rehabilitation, Local Agency Programs (LAP)/ Small County Outreach Programs (SCOP)/ Small County Road Assistance Programs (SCRAP)/ CIGP funded projects, transportation impact analysis and site development plans. Identified and prioritized intersection improvement projects through the analysis of Signal 4 crash incidents and involvement with the County's Community Traffic Safety Team meetings. Achieved certifications while in the role including Advanced Maintenance of Traffic (MOT), International Municipal Signal Association (IMSA) Traffic Signal Technician Level I and APWA Re -accreditation. Pavement Management Program, City of Tampa, Tampa, FL — Pavement Management Engineer responsible for executing design plans from drainage, signs, pavement markings, traffic calming implementation and ADA accessibility. Led budget forecasting, planned and obtained additional funding sources through state and local funding opportunities, budget presentations, assessing budgetary needs and overall driving projects through to completion. Commanded the City of Tampa's Pavement Management Program which includes in-house construction projects, overseeing Construction Engineering and Inspection's and driving survey and design projects to consultants, arborists, geotechnical firms and contractors for brick street repairs, street resurfacing, signs, markings and MOT projects. Managed the City of Tampa's Transportation ADA Transition Plan, which includes overseeing inventory, inspection, design and repair schedules. The project managed downtown Tampa's Curb Extension Program and the FDOT Highway Safety Improvement Plan submittal. Successfully managed the Capital Sidewalk Program through design, procurement, budgeting and constructing new sidewalks. Developed the City's 2013 City of Tampa's Paving Program (with an $8 million annual operating capital budget) and pavement preservation program (an $800,000 annual budget), Longliner - Striping and Marking Program ($200,000 annual budget). Responsible for the development and management of the City of Tampa's five-year pavement resurfacing plan, including asphalt, bricks and ROW. Developed technical specifications for paving, striping reflectivity, reclamite, traffic signs and markings contracts. Successfully incorporated construction management practices defined by FDOT Roadway Design Standards and drove additional testing to prove product quality. Developed Geographic Information System (GIS) maps for the city's pavement condition network, structural condition index, five-year paving plan, Longliner program and the Sidewalk program. Coordinated the utility permit process including Inter -departmental, Sunshine, Southwest Florida Water Management District, ROW and Accela. Earned distinguish honors and recognition in 2014 and 2015 for APWA Project of the Year Award on the Full Depth Reclamation Projects on Pierce St. and Hanna Ave. Developed growth competencies in practical presentation skills through successfully presenting the Pavement Management Program to City Council staff, Mayor and the Public Works Administrator. JORGE UY, PE, PTOE, RSP-1 HNTB 36 KEY PERSONNEL EXPERIENCE BEN WALKER, PE NEPA Re-Evaluation/Environmental Sciences Ben Walker has 27 years of experience in the civil engineering field, including Intermodal Systems Development (ISD), Project Development and Environment (PD&E) studies, transit research and land use planning. Prior to joining HNTB, Ben worked with the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) District 1 beginning in the Professional Engineer Trainee Program, transitioning to a PD&E project manager and ultimately the ISD manager. Through Ben's experience as ISD Manager for District 1, he reviewed and developed statewide and district policies, programs, roadway and transit planning document and brings an understanding of FDOT processes, policies and programs. This experience offers a distinct advantage in effectively navigating the re-evaluation process while providing valuable institutional knowledge for successful public outreach. BEN WALKER, PE Project Experience: Firm HNTB Corporation 1-4 Express Lane PD&E Study, Hillsborough and Polk Counties, FL - Project Manager that led the development of the initial starter and long-term project concepts. Also helped Education develop Master Plan project descriptions, design criteria, the regional concept of M.S., Civil Engineering, University of South transportation operations documentation, and public outreach materials. Florida, 1998 B.S., Civil Engineering, University of South Big Bend Road PD&E Study, Hillsborough County BOCC, Hillsborough County, Tampa, Florida, 1996 FL — Hillsborough County Project Manager for this study that reviewed widening Big Bend Road (CR 674), a strategic intermodal system (SIS) connector, from four to six lanes, as well Professional Registrations as operational improvements to the I-75/Big Bend Road interchange. Professional Engineer: FL, 2001, (#57625) Old Dixie Highway PD&E Study, Polk County, FL — Project Manager for the feasibility phase that analyzed connecting two trailheads with a new 14-mile trail that may become a Professional Affiliations part of the SUNTrail network. Florida Automated Vehicle Technology and Infrastructure Working Group -Secretary FDOT District One PD&E Districtwide Consultant, Districtwide, FL —Project Manager for this task work order -based contract that performed several different aspects of PD&E studies Certifications & Training throughout District One. Highway Program Financing Advanced Project Traffic Forecasting GEC ISD Services, FDOT District 1, FL — Project Manager for GEC ISD tasks. Tasks Quality Level of Service Analysis Quality completed as a part of GEC assignments included an analysis of gas tax collections and S SADAynchro distributions within the district and statewide, converting a proposed one-way pair facility to for Construction Projects two-way operations, roundabout design and analysis, Minor Type 11 Categorical Exclusions, Modern Roundabout Design Workshop scope development, and subarea planning analysis for future PD&E studies. SR 559 Interchange Operation Analysis Report (IOAR) and PD&E Re-evaluation, Polk Hire Date with HNTB County, FL — FDOT District 1 Project Manager for this study that involved completing an May 2010 IOAR and a PD&E Re-evaluation for the SR 559 interchange in Polk County. Years of Experience with Lakeland Rail Alternatives Analysis, FDOT District 1, Bartow, FL - Project Engineer other Firms responsible for planning analysis and public outreach associated with the potential relocation 16 of a major rail line in Polk County. Through looking at different alternatives, an information system project was developed that provided area roadway users real-time information regarding upcoming delays associated with rail crossing closures. 1-10 PD&E, FDOT District 3, Chipley, FL — Project Manager for this PD&E Study that evaluates widening 1-10 from a four to six -lane facility as well as analysis for interchange improvements. Coordination with an adjacent PD&E study as well as with concurrent design consultants play an important part in the success of this study. N NTB 37 KEY PERSONNEL EXPERIENCE General Engineering Contract (GEC), FDOT District 3, Tampa, FL — Task Lead for this contract on which HNTB is providing comprehensive engineering services to the District. HNTB's primary roles include assisting in the delivery of projects, outlining key project features and requirements for preliminary concept reports, developing contract scope of service and serving as project managers to efficiently deliver the work program. Prior to joining HNTB, Ben's project experience included the following: Intermodal Systems Development (ISD) Manager, FDOT District 1, Bartow, FL —ISD Manager responsible for managing, training and developing leaders within the Systems Planning, Modal Development and Community Liaison sections of ISD. Reviewed and developed statewide and district policies, programs and roadway and transit planning documents. Provided technical assistance and leadership to area MPOs, BOCCs, local municipalities, transit agencies, Port Manatee and airports on issues related to DOT projects, programs, budgeting and prioritization. Provided technical analysis and review for transportation plans, project traffic, intersection/ interchange analysis and growth management activities on projects. FDOT District 1, Bartow, FL — PD&E Project Manager for the following projects in District 1: Upper Manatee River Road Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), Manatee County — Project Manager for the widening of two, two-lane rural roadways into continuous four- or six -lane suburban facilities connected by a new bridge spanning the Manatee River. Extensive project coordination was required with Manatee County, local homeowners and homeowner associations, Sierra Club, Seminole Indians, Florida Historic Preservation Office, U.S. Coast Guard, Florida Department of Environmental Protection and Federal Highway Association. The analysis required potential Section 106, 4(f) and Seminole Indian documentation in order to clear uncommon environmental hurdles. US 301 PD&E, Sarasota County — Project Manager for the Type II Categorical Exclusion (CE) analyzed widening a four -lane urban and suburban facility to six lanes. Englewood Interstate Connector, Sarasota and Charlotte Counties — Project Engineer for this project that was initially scoped as an EIS due to the potential addition of several miles of the new alignment. However, the preferred alternative involved improving an existing two-lane rural corridor to a six -lane suburban corridor. - US 27 PD&E and Re-evaluation, Polk County — Project Manager for this Type II CE that improved a four -lane rural facility to a six -lane suburban and urban facility between SR 60 and SR 544 and between SR 544 to the south of 1-4. HNTB BEN WALKER, PE 38 Brent Postma Utilities Lead Role ■ Sr. Utility Coordinator Professional Affiliations ■ ACEC ■ FICE ■ Florida Utilities Coordination Committee Certifications ■ FUCC, Utility Coordination Certification, Module #2 FI FMFN'' ENGINEERING GROUP Since beginning his career with a local regional electrical company over three decades ago, Brent Postma has been immersed in the utility industry. Forthe last 12 years, he has gained extensive knowledge and experience providing Utility Coordination (UC) services for the transportation industry by working in all facets of UC, from design to construction, including serving as a FDOT liaisonfor in-house UC. As Group Manager of ELEMENT's UCGroup, he currently oversees all components of UC projects by providing utility relocation plans, negotiating utility work schedules, and reviewing permits in accordance with the standard policies and practices of the FDOT. His experience includes major and minor roadway, Design Build, PD&E, and construction projects. He is proficient in many standard UC policies and procedures, including Utility Work Highway Contractor (UWHCA), review and submittal of permits, utility adjustment and relocation agreements, subordination of easements, conflict analysis, constructability reviews, managing advance utility relocation activities, process interstate reimbursements and lighting agreements. Mr. Postma's relevant project experience includes: Cost Estimating/Billing Process, FDOT District One, US 41 from CR 951 to Greenway Road, Collier County, FL. Utility Module #5 Project Manager. Provided utility coordination services for the reconstruction of US 41 from • AutoCAD a two lane to a six lanefrom East of CR 951 to Joseph Lane transitioning to a four lane from Joseph Lane to Greenway Road in Collier County. Responsibilities included: identifying existing utility facilities, coordinating subordination of easements, conducting phase utility meetings, identifying and addressing utility conflicts. FDOT District One, SR 82 (Immokalee Road) from Alabama Road to Homestead Road, Lee County, FL. Utility ProjectManager. Providing utility coordination for the reconstruction of SR 82 from a two-lane rural roadway to a six -lane divided roadway. Responsibilities include, identifying existing utility facilities and securing agreements, securing work schedules and plans from existing UAO's to ensure all utility conflicts are addressed and resolved, conduct phase utility meetings, and certify all utility negotiations. FDOT District One, SR 82 from Lee Boulevard to Shawnee Road and SR 82 Alabama Road to Homestead Road, Lee County, FL. Utility Project Manager. Provided utility coordination for the reconstruction of SR 82 in Lee County from a two-lane rural roadway to a six -lane divided suburban roadway. Responsibilities included: identifying existing utility facilities, securing agreements, workschedules and plans from existing UAOsto ensure all utility conflicts were addressed and resolved, conducted phase meetings and certified all utility negotiations. Reviewed roadway plans for constructability with existingand proposed utility facilities, developed utility work schedules and monitored utility relocation work to ensure schedules were met and reviewed new utility permitrequests along project corridor. FDOT District One, US 17/92 Hinson Ave from SR 17 (101" St) to 171" St, Polk County, FL. Utility Project Manager. Utility Coordination support is being provided for this PD&E Study in Polk County. The project calls for roadway and intersection alternatives to be analyzed and properly documented including innovative ways to minimize impacts to the natural, social, economic, cultural and physical environment. A consideration is given to increase the capacity across the railroad track in the vicinity of Downtown Haines City, if so recommended after studies are complete. Responsibilities for this study include contacting and working with EOR's and UAO's within this project corridor to identify and determine utilities within these parameters. Should conflicts arise, a comprehensive strategy will be created to address and resolve any and all issues. A meticulous record is being kept to properly document each utility's status as to the progress of resolving these conflicts. Upon completion of the agreed upon recommendations for these conflict resolutions, a report will be provided to the District Secretary for approval. 39 Brent Postma Senior Utility Coordinator ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................ FDOT District One, 1-75 (SR 93) at SR 884 (Colonial Blvd) Interchange, Lee County, FL. Utility Project Manager. Provided utility coordination services for this design build project consisting of the construction of an auxiliary lane in the Northbound (NB) and Southbound (SB) directions on 1-75 from North of the SR 884 (Colonial Blvd) Interchange to south of the SR 82 (Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd) Interchange. A Continuous Flow Intersection will also be constructed at SR 884 (Colonial Blvd) and Six Mile Cypress Parkway/Ortiz Avenue, with a diverging interchange at SR 884 (Colonial Blvd) and 1-75 (SR 93) and a Superstreet at Colonial Blvd and Forum Blvd. Responsibilities included, contacting and coordinating with all Utility Agency Owners (UAOs) identified and located within the parameters of the project to secure agreements, work schedules and plans needed to address and ensure resolution of all utility conflicts. Additional duties performed consisted of conducting phase meetings, reviewing utility permit application packages, reviewing roadway plans for constructability and the proper documentation of all Utility Agreements. Periodic updates were also provided to FDOT Project Managers, as well as the District Utility Officeas needed. FDOT District One, Districtwide Continuous Service Utility Coordination Contract, FL. Utility Project Manager. On a Task Work Order basis, Utility Coordination services are currently being provided for The District. Responsibilities include: identifying existing utility facilities, securing agreements, work schedules and plans from existing UAOs to ensure all utility conflicts are addressed and resolved, conducting phase meetings and certifying all utility negotiation, reviewing roadway plans for constructability with existing and proposed utility facilities, developing utility work schedules and monitoring utility relocation work to ensure schedules are met and reviewing new utility permit requests along project corridor. Hillsborough County, Fletcher Avenue Complete Street Project from Nebraska Avenue to 50th Street, FL. Utility Project Manager. Provided utility coordination services for the proposed roadway improvements on Fletcher Avenue. Responsibilities included: identifying existing utility facilities, secured agreements, work schedules and plans from existing UAOs to ensure all utility conflicts were addressed and resolved, conducting phase meetings and certifying all utility negotiations. Reviewing roadway plans for constructabil ity with existing and proposed utility facilities, developing utility work schedules and monitoring utility relocation work to ensure schedules are met and review of new utility permit requests along project corridor. Hillsborough County, Bruce B. Downs Blvd. from Palm Springs to Hillsborough County Line (Segment D), FL. Utility Project Manager. Providing construction utility coordination services for this four -lane to six -lane major reconstruction project which included: signalized intersection replacement and relocation of all utilities in addition to ten -inch watermains and forcemains and three new CAN poles. Responsibilities include: conducting utilityfield meetings, identifying and addressing utility conflicts, reviewing and coordinating all as -built drawings, managing relocation efforts of utility UWHCA work performed by the County's Contractor, documenting and resolving potential delay claims and attending weekly progress meetings. FDOT District One, SR 659 (Combee Rd) from US 98 to Skyview Drive, Polk County, FL. Utility Project Manager. Utility Coordination services are being provided in connection with this Project Development and Environment(PD&E) Study. The objectives for this project will be to optimize vehicle access along the corridor, as well as improve transit facilities, while providing accommodations that are safe for pedestrians and bicyclists. Responsibilities include a complete and thorough review of all prior studies performed in the area specifically the Complete Street Action plan for SR 659 Combee Road, Neighborhood Mobility Audits for Crystal Lake/Combee, Pedestrian Safety and Bicycle Safety Action Plans. Additionally, the ELEMENT Team is working with The District's Utility Office (DUO) as well as contacting all UAO's within or adjacent to this corridor. A Utility Assessment Package is in process and will be delivered to the DUO upon completion. All above ground and subsurface utilities, as well as railroad facilities are being determined to carefullyverify and document all possible conflicts within these parameters. A detailed plan is being formulated to address and resolve these potential issues and will be presented and discussed during this process with the DUO and all UAO's to reach an amicable resolution, while ensuring the project's schedule is on -time. FDOT District One, SR 64 WB (Manatee Ave) from SR684 (US 41/301) to SR 45 (US 41 Bus) MP 0.953—1.455, Manatee County, FL. Utility Project Manager. Providing Utility Coordination services for this project which consists of traffic operational enhancements needed to improve capacity and reduce congestion in downtown Bradenton, Manatee County. Restriping or modification of lane assignments, as well as minor median modifications, urbanization of several intersections, new signals and modifications to existing signals will also be implemented. There is also existing drainage (consisting of curb and gutter and closed stormwater facilities) that are being evaluated and maintained as needed. Coordination with UAO's along this corridor, including phase meetings, securing agreements, reviewing roadway plans for constructability, creating and implementing plans for utility conflicts to be addressed and relocated as needed are being performed. 40 Peter Mattson, PSM SURVEY/SUE LEAD Role • Survey/SUE Education • B.S., University ofMiami, Pending Registration • Professional Surveyor and Mapper (PSM) Florida, LS006290, 2001 Professional Affiliations • Florida Surveying and Mapping Society (FSMS) • Design Build Institute of America (DBIA) Specialized Training • Route Surveys • Boundary Surveys • ALTA/ACSM Surveys • Topographic Surveys • Right -of -Way (ROW) Surveys • Global Positioning Software (GPS) • Real Time Kinematic(TRK) • Electronic Field Book (EFB)- EFBP • Autodesk Civil 3D 2012 • Leica Cyclone 8.0 • Leica Topo II 2.0 • HDS Laser Scanning El rnnrr"r ENGINEERING GROUP Pete Mattson has 41 years of experience as a survey consultant for the Florida Department of Transportation(FDOT) including providing surveying and mapping services for numerous Interstate projects, control surveys, design surveys, rightof way mapping and expert witness testimony. His experience includes topographic, design, boundary, and construction surveys; right of way control surveys and maps; horizontal and vertical control networks; EFB data collection; GPS and real time kinematic (RTK) and HDS Laser scanning (Terrestrial Static). He has diverse experience in both the field and office. Through his performance -driven management style, he has proven his strong commitmentto exceeding clients' expectations by anticipating their needs and delivering more than what is requested. Mr. Mattson's relevant project experience includes: FDOT District One, District Wide Survey and Mapping Contract 2015, FL. Survey Manager for this 5-year on -going contract consisting of providing surveying and mapping support to the Department. The work includes miscellaneous field support for design projects, control surveys, ROW surveys and various survey support functions. The following is a listof recent task assignments. • US 41 (SR 45) at Midway 2.7-mile design survey, Charlotte County, FL. • US 41 (SR 45) at Hancock, 1-mile design survey, Charlotte County, FL. • US 41 (SR 45) at Conway 1-mile design survey, Charlotte County, FL. • US 41 (SR 45) 2-mile design survey, Manatee County, FL. • US 301 (SR43) 3-miledesign survey, Manatee County, FL. FDOT District One, SR 45 (US 41) from Beneva Road to SR 72 (Stickney Point Road) Road, Sarasota County, FL. Survey Manager for this 2.4-mile Complete Streets project. This full design survey included horizontal and vertical control, alignment, topographic survey, DTM with cross sections, and a drainage survey. A combination Terrestrial LiDAR, and conventional survey methods were used on this project. FDOT District One, SR 45 (US 41) from Blackburn Point Road to Beneva Road, Sarasota County, FL. Survey Manager for this 3.9-mile Complete Streets project. The design survey involved providing horizontal and vertical control, establish historical alignments from existing RW and maps, references, preparation of a full topographic survey and DTM and drainage survey. Surveyfiles were prepared in SS4 format for 3D modeling. FDOT District One, SR 64, from 751" Street to 591" Street, Manatee County, FL. Survey Manager for a design survey update for a District One lighting project. Services included recovery and re -stake of alignment and references, topographic survey update along the South side of the project, right of way verification and utility locations as designated, and a bench run. Element also located overhead lines and clearances on the North side of the project for lighting alternatives. FDOT District One, SR 37 from Imperial Boulevard to Glendale Street, Polk County, FL. Survey Manager for this .55-mile design survey that involved providing horizontal and vertical control, establish historical alignments from existing RW and maps, references, preparation of a full topographic survey and DTM and drainage survey. Surveyfiles were prepared in SS4 format for 3D modeling. 41 Peter Mattson, PSM SUR Principal Surveyor ............................................................................................................ FDOT District One, SR 37 from Manatee/Polk County Line to CR 674, Polk County, FL. Survey Manager for this 4.65-mile design survey that involved providing horizontal and vertical control, establish historical alignments from existing RW and maps, references, preparation of a full topographic surveyand DTM and drainage survey. Surveyfileswere prepared in SS4 format for 3D modeling. FDOT District One, SR 600 (US 92) from North Galloway Road to Wabash Avenue, Polk County, FL. Survey Manager for this 2- mile design survey that involved providing horizontal control, updated vertical control, establish historical alignments from existing RW and maps, references, Terrestrial LiDARfor a 3D topographic survey and drainage survey. Surveyfiles were prepared in SS4 format for 3D modeling. FDOT District One, SR542 from Buckeye Loop to US 27, Winter Haven, FL. Project Surveyor responsible for alignment, references, vertical bench lines, subdivision location, jurisdictional lines, and geotechnical location. FDOT District One required survey database services for the widening and reconstruction of SR 542, between the towns of Winter Haven and Dundee. Relying on past experience working in DistrictOne and with recommendations from Districtsurvey staff members, this project was completed in a manner consistent with District expectations, Mr. Mattson's successful completion of the original survey tasks enabled the completion an additional mileof surveydatabase work, without any impactto the project schedule or budget. FDOT District One, SR 72 at Myakka Valley Trail, Sarasota County, FL. Survey Manager for a one -mile control and design survey update for a District One turn -lane project. Services included providing project network control, recovery and re -stake of alignment and references, topographic survey update along the North side of the project, right of way verification, drainage survey, and a bench run services. FDOT District One, GEC Services, Polk, Sarasota, Manatee, Charlotte, Collier, Desoto, Hardee, Hendry, Highlands, Okeechobee, Glades, and Lee Counties, FL. Survey Project Manager. This GEC contract required a multitude of surveying services including design surveying, drainage, as-builts, ROW determination, and acquisitions. FDOT District One, Lake Alfred Pedestrian Bridge, SR 600 (US 17/92), Polk County, FL. Survey Manager for design survey for a proposed pedestrian bridge at the Intersection of SR 600 and South Buena Vista Drive. Services included horizontal and vertical control, alignment and references, topographic survey and DTM, cross sections, drainage survey and ROW verification. Element also made updates to some existing topography provided by the Department and merged the two files for a seamless DTM. Hillsborough County, Professional and Miscellaneous Services for Geomatics, Hillsborough County, FL. Survey Manager for this miscellaneous surveying and mapping contract for Hillsborough County's Geomatics Division. Project assignments include boundary surveys, photogrammetric control, topographic design surveys and verification, as well as certified Digital Terrain Model (DTM) surveys, right of way surveys, wetland jurisdictional surveys, and horizontal and /or vertical data surveys. The following is a list of recent task assignments. • Gallagher Road at Sea Critter Lane Drainage Improvements Topographic Survey. • GIS —Local Mitigation Strategy. • Calm Harbour Boundary Survey for Location and Occupation. • University Area Library Boundary/Topographic Survey. • ValricoWWTP Pump Station Boundary/Topographic and SCADA Surveys 42 IVAN F. SOKOLIC P.E. CONTAMINATION/GEOTECHNICAL LEAD ARDAMAN & ASSOCIATES, INC. EDUCATION AASHTO Leadership Academy, 2013 M.S. Civil Engineering, University of South Florida, 2003 B.S. Civil Engineering, P. Universidad Catolica del Peru, 2000 REGISTRATION / PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS Professional Engineer, Florida, No. 64114, 2006 Member, American Society of Civil Engineers Member, Florida Engineering Society EXPERIENCE Mr. Sokolic has more than 22 years of experience in management, design, and construction of engineering projects. He has held positions in the private and public sectors, including eight years with the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT). He has extensive knowledge of transportation standards, concepts, practices, and procedures, as well as geotechnical engineering, pavement evaluation, materials testing, and construction engineering and inspection (CEI). His project experience includes foundation design recommendations and materials testing evaluation for industrial, commercial, and residential low to high-rise structures, transportation facilities, water and wastewater treatment facilities, park and recreation facilities, and mining activities. As Branch Manager of the Ft. Myers office, he supervises a team of engineers, scientists, technicians, inspectors, drillers, and administrative personnel. His responsibilities include determining and performing the scope of services for quality control/quality assurance, construction materials and testing, and geotechnical projects. Mr. Sokolic currently serves as project manager for FDOT, city, county, and continuing services agreements for geotechnical and materials testing services. The following items describe part of his project experience: FDOT Districts One and Seven, District Geotechnical Office, FL As the Assistant District Geotechnical Engineer for FDOT Districts One and Seven from 2011 to 2014, Mr. Sokolic was responsible for the staff in the geotechnical section at the District Materials and Research Office. Performed field inspections on ongoing projects. Provided technical expertise to the District Design, Construction, and Maintenance offices. Oversaw the development of foundation designs and recommendations for all major and minor bridge construction projects in the 17 counties in the two districts. FDOT District One, Geotechnical & Materials Testing & Inspection, Continuing Services Contract, FL As a consultant, Mr. Sokolic has managed several geotechnical, materials testing, and pavement evaluation contracts with FDOT including the current $5 million CA509 contract to support the Department with geotechnical, coring, and materials testing tasks. North 2 Utilities Expansion Project — Cape Coral, Lee County, FL In charge of all personnel providing material testing services for this utility infrastructure project with an area of approximately five (5) square miles located in the northwest and northeast quadrants of the City of Cape Coral. Lee Roy Selmon Crosstown Expressway, Hillsborough County, FL Responsible for the field data collection operations, data reduction, and results reporting related to the Cross -Hole Sonic Logging (CSL) testing on more than 30 drilled shafts pier foundations for the reversible lanes elevated roadway in the City of Tampa. SR 62 from US 301 (SR 43) to SR 37, Manatee County, FL Responsible for providing pavement coring and evaluation services for this 19-mile roadway project located in Manatee County. Responsibilities include coordination of field operations, review and classification of pavement cores, structural number calculations, and milling depth recommendations for the new pavement. South Golf Improvements — City of Naples, Collier County FL (ongoing) Responsible for providing geotechnical services for the design of a safe road for all users along South Golf Drive, approximately 0.71 miles, between Gulf Shore Boulevard North and US 41. Buckingham Road & Gunnery Road Roundabout, Lee County, FL Responsible for providing geotechnical services for this Safety and traffic flow improvements project located in Lee County. Responsibilities include coordination of field operations, assignment of laboratory testing of soils, visual classification of soils, and design recommendations for the roadway. 8th St Golden Gate to Randall Blvd, Collier County, FL Working as the FDOT Fort Myers Operations Construction Manager monitoring Quality Assurance/Quality Control (QA/QC) of the construction plans for compliance with federal and state policies and procedures of this design -build new bridge and roadway widening construction project located in Golden Gates Estates in Collier County. =Ardaman & Associates, Inc. Geotechnical, Environmental and 43 Materials Consultants ® ARCHAEOLOGICAL CONSULTANTS INC. Florida's First Choice in Cultural ResourceManagement LEE HUTCHINSON, RPA NEPA Re-Evaluation/Environmental Sciences Ms. Hutchinson, Senior Archaeologist/Project Archaeologist and ACI Laboratory Director, has 35 years of Cultural Resource Management (CRM) experience throughout Florida. She is responsible for crew, vehicle, and equipment scheduling for all FDOT District projects. Ms. Hutchinson also organizes and manages laboratory operations and oversees technicians in the analysis of artifacts including their identification, evaluation, and interpretation. She is responsible for collections management including the accessioning and treatment of cultural materials in compliance with pertinent federal and state regulations. Final curation, including packaging prior to conveyance to the client, or final disposition of the material to a curatorial facility, is under her supervision as well. Professional Credentials Meets the Secretary of Interior's Professional Qualifications Standards Registered Professional Archaeologist (RPA) M.A. Anthropology/Public Archaeology, University of South Florida,1990 B.A. Anthropology, Marshall University, 1985 Florida Archaeological Council (Past - President) Hillsborough County Historic Resources Review Board (Past Chair) Florida Public Archaeology Network (Former Director) Relevant Professional Training Revised Section 106 Workshop Cultural Resource Management Plans Preparation and Implementations Workshops in Ceramic, Faunal, Lithic Analysis, Human Osteology CPR, Environmental FirstAid, AED, and OSHA Certified "Working Effiicientlywith Tribal Governments" • Liaison between the FDOT Districts One, Five and Seven and the FHWA/SHPO for Continuing Services Contracts, Task Assignments, and PD&E Studies; responsible for preparing FDOT letters to the SHPO for final project submittal and approval. • Oversight for over 500 cultural resource linear projects for the FDOT, Florida's Turnpike Enterprise, and various county and city governments. • Lead technical writer for cultural resource assessment component for PD&E Study reports, pond siting Technical Memoranda, Right -of -Way Transfers, Corridor Re -Evaluations, and Bridge Replacements. • Development of site predictive models for corridor analysis based on knowledge of current historic and prehistoric Florida environments, geology, and natural resources. • Experience with alternate survey methods including ground penetrating radar (GPR), probing, and historic and modern aerial photography. • Public involvement experience with certified local governments, county archaeologists, and other local agencies involved with historic preservation. • Preparation of NRHP nominations, Determinations of Eligibility (DOE), Linear Resource Group Forms, and Florida Master Site File (FMSF) forms. • Is the Lead Technical Person for ACI's Quality Control/Quality Assurance Compliance. • Has training in Cemetery Resources Protection, attended cemetery seminars, monitors all GPR conducted at known and unknown cemetery sites. • Coordinator for 811 Sunshine calls prior to field survey. 8110 BlaikieCourt, Suite A, Sarasota, Florida 34240, (941) 379-6206 • Tallahassee Area Office: (850) 926-9285 • St. Augustine Area Office: (904) 829-9100 44 George W. Hackney, P.S.M. 3urvey,3UL George Hackney has been working in the Surveying field since 1986 when he first joined ABB. He began his duties as a Survey crew rodman and was later promoted to instrument man and later Survey Crew Party Chief. Mr. Hackney left ABB for the University of Florida in 1991 to pursue a Bachelor's Degree in Surveying and Mapping, returning in 1993 after graduation. As a project Surveyor, Mr. Hackney is responsible for Boundary Surveys of sectionalized lands, subdivisions, and metes and bounds parcels; Topographic Surveys for engineering design, Quantity Surveys; Condominium Surveys and preparation of condominium documents; Hydrographic Surveys; roadway Control Surveys, roadway Design Surveys and Right -of -Way mapping; subdivision planning and construction layout of all phases of subdivision construction, including home sites, utilities, roadways and buildings; Record Surveys/As-Built Surveys; field locations of environmental jurisdictional lines; horizontal and vertical control for aerial photography. Mr. Hackney's technical background includes proficiency in Leica GPS Systems, AutoCAD versions R-12 through 2007, electronic data collection systems and processors, Carlson Surveying Program, Leica Geo-Office GPS software, Trimble GPS Systems. EXPERIENCE: Commercial Development Ferrari of Naples, Naples TownePlace Suites, Naples Shops of Marco, Marco Island Bonita Bay Plaza, Bonita Springs Wal-Mart, Estero Surveying services for all phases of Commercial development including the original boundary survey through construction to the final ALTA survey Roadway Design, Right -of -Way and Control Surveys C.R. 951 — Collier Boulevard, Collier County C.R. 869 — Summerlin Road, Lee County C.R. 864 — Rattlesnake -Hammock Road, Collier Country C.R. 268 - County Barn Road, Collier Country Surveying services for all phases of roadway construction including alignment layout, right of way takings, control surveys and as -built surveys Subdivision and Residential Projects Career Pathways Learning Lab, Immokalee Carlton Lakes, Naples Twin Eagles, Naples Villa Medici, Fort Myers Spring Run and Copperleaf at The Brooks, Estero Vanderbilt Reserve, Naples Surveying services for all phases of subdivision development including boundary surveys, platting, construction surveying services, as-builts surveys, site plans Municipalities Mr. Hackney's experience includes providing Professional Surveying Services for Collier County, Lee County, City of Marco and the City of Naples. 45 Ra 79?1 Collier County Government I Solicitation 21-7901 HNTB is committed to using small and emerging businesses on this contract, and we have continuously demonstrated the use of certified Minority Business Enterprises (MBE), Women Business Enterprise (WBE), disadvantaged business enterprises (DBE) and small business enterprises (SBE) on past contracts. Element Engineering Group, LLC is a certified MBE and DBE. Archaeological Consultants, Inc. is a certified WBE. P��Y� kyqq & Minority Business Certification Element Engineering Group Is certified underthe provisions of 287 and 295.187, Florida Statutes, for a period from: 05/23/2020 05/23/2022 .Ivnatha¢ @. 8accex. Secretarp Florida Dapsn— of Yf anag--t-9—ia �p— Office of S."Plier Orver , MANAGEMENT 4050Espl—dWay,S-tT SERVICES Tallahasee FL 32355 Office cf 5uppller Diversity ww ,J—yflorida.—Jm d Woman Business Certification Archaeological Consultants, Inc. Is certified underthe provisions of 287 and 295.187, Florida Statutes, for a period from: 10/21/2019 10121 /2021 ]snatha¢ R. 8attet, 8ecretaxg Flxida Depart —t nM.—g—t-%—is �epanment ct Office of SuPpiier ow-0 MANAGEMENT "°°EPT atleWay.S°Ee99° Tal lahaQee, FL 31399 SERVICES�� o- OMrce of Supplier Diversity www emsmNl«idsrornlo<d HNTB 46 Collier County Government I Solicitation 21-7901 &Wamlgjk� Eleven Bridge Replacements Collier County Government Score 100 Golden Gate Estates PD&E FDOT District 1 96 Miscellaneous Professional Engineering Services Contract Hillsborough County Government 94 Belleair Road from Keene Road to US 19 Multimodal Feasibly Study Pinellas County Government 96 Bruce B. Downs from Pebble Creek to County Line Road Hillsborough County Government 94 Tampa Downtown Resurfacing Complete Streets City of Tampa 100 CR 578 (County Line Rd.) FDOT District 7 100 SR 52 from US 41 to CR 581 FDOT District 7 93 SR 60 from Valrico Rd to Dover Road FDOT District 7 100 US 27 from Ritchie Rd to Barry Road FDOT District 1 94 %INTB 47 Collier County Solicitation 21-7901 collier County Administrative Services Department Procurement Services Division Form 5 Reference Questionnaire (USE ONE FORM FOR EACH REO UIRED REFERENCE) Solicitation: 21-7901 Immokalee Road at Randall Boulevard Intersection Improvements Reference Questionnaire for: HNTB Corporation (Name of Company Requesting Reference Information) Sadie Dalton, PE (Name of Individuals Requesting Reference Information) Name: Marlene Messam, PE Company: Collier County (Evaluator completing reference questionnaire) (Evaluator's Company completing reference) Email: Marlene.Messam@colliercountyfl.gov FAX: (239) 252-588 2 Telephone:(239) 252-5773 Collier County has implemented a process that collects reference information on firms and their key personnel to be used in the selection of firms to perform this project. The Name of the Company listed in the Subject above has listed you as a client for which they have previously performed work. Please complete the survey. Please rate each criteria to the best of your knowledge on a scale of 1 to 10, with 10 representing that you were very satisfied (and would hire the firm/individual again) and 1 representing that you were very unsatisfied (and would never hire the firm/individual again). If you do not have sufficient knowledge of past performance in a particular area, leave it blank and the item or form will be scored 11 0." Project Description: Eleven Bridge Replacements Project Budget: $2,430,470.75 (Design) Completion Date: 7/16/2021 (Design) Project Number of Days: 1418 Item Criteria Score (must be completed) 1 Ability to manage the project costs (minimize change orders to scope). 10 2 Ability to maintain project schedule (complete on -time or early). 10 3 Quality of work. 10 4 Quality of consultative advice provided on the project. 10 5 Professionalism and ability to manage personnel. 10 6 Project administration (completed documents, final invoice, final product turnover; invoices; manuals or going forward documentation, etc.) 10 7 Ability to verbally communicate and document information clearly and succinctly. 10 8 Ability to manage risks and unexpected project circumstances. 10 9 Ability to follow contract documents, policies, procedures, rules, regulations, etc. 10 10 Overall comfort level with hiring the company in the future (customer satisfaction). 10 TOTAL SCORE OF ALL ITEMS 100 MessamMarl Mesa mMarene MessamMarlby ene e n e Date: 2021.05.12 17:19:37-04'00' 48 ***UPDATED JANUARY 28, 2020*** Collier County Government I Solicitation 21-7901 Immokalee 1 -- Regional Airport 030136 ' 030137 030138 030 Immokalee i Group A Bridq "" Group D (LAP) Bridqe a \: - k t k. 03 030140 10301411 EXISTING WILDLIFE CROSSING .r� l "` Group B Bridges e Group C Bridges 8558 ' OIL WELL RD ' i Collier County Solicitation 21-7901 CoZlier County Administrative Services Department Procurement Services Division Form 5 Reference Questionnaire (USE ONE FORMFOR EA CHREQUIREDREFERENCE) Solicitation: 21-7901 ImmokaleeRoad atRandall Boulevard Intersection Improvements Reference Questionnaire for: HNTB Corporation (Name of Company Requesting Reference Information) Collier County (Name ofIndividuals Requesting Reference Information) Name: Marlon Bizerra Company: FDOT District One (Evaluator completing reference questionnaire) (Evaluator's Company completing reference) Email: Marlon.Bizerra(a),dot.state.fl.us FAX: (239)338-2353 Telephone: 8 6 3-5 19-22 50 Collier County has implemented a process that collects reference information on firm s and their key personnel to be used in the selection of firms to perform this proj ect The Name of the Company listed in the Subj ect above has listed you a s a client for which they have previously performed work. Please completethe survey. Please rate each criteria to the best of your knowledge on a scale of 1 to 10, with 10 representing that you were very satisfied (and would hire the firm/individual again) and 1 representing that you were very unsatisfied (andwould neverhire the firm/individual again). Ifyou donothave sufficient knowledge ofpast performance in a particular area, leaveit blankandthe item orform will be scored 11 0." Project Description: Golden Gate Estates PD&E Project Budget: $580,801.72 Completion Date: 6/3 0/15 Project Number of Days: 196 days Item Criteria Score (must be complete 1 Ability to manage the project costs (minimize change orders to scope). 09 2 Ability to maintain project schedule (complete on -time or early). 10 3 Quality of work. 10 4 Quality ofconsultative adviceprovided onthe project. 10 5 Professionalism andability tomanage personnel. 09 6 Project administration (completed documents, finalinvoice, finalproduct turnover; invoices; manuals orgoingforward documentation, etc.) 09 7 Ability to verbally communicate and document information clearly and succinctly. 09 8 Ability to managerisks and unexpected project circumstances. 10 9 Ability to follow contract documents, policies, procedures, rules, regulations, etc. 10 10 Overallcomfort levelwith hiringthe companyin the future (customer satisfaction). 10 TOTAL SCORE OF ALL ITEMS 96 ***UPDATED JANUARY 28, 2020*** PUBLIC HEARING Collier County and the Florida Department of Transpor- tation (FDOT), District One, invite you to the public hear- ing for the Project Development and Environment (PD&E) study of the Golden Gate Estates bridges in Naples, Florida. The study is part of an overall plan to enhance mobility, allow for faster response times for emergency services and improve evacuation routes. The preferred alterna- tives under consideration include new bridge crossings over canals on: • 8th Street N.E. between Golden Gate Blvd. and Randall Blvd. • 16th Street N.E. between Golden Gate Blvd. and Randall Blvd. • 47th Ave. N.E. between lmmokalee Road and Everglades Blvd. An informal open house begins at 5 p.m. The formal public hearing starts at 6 p.m. and includes a presenta- tion about the study and preferred alternatives, followed by a public comment period. Documents will be on display at the Collier County Public Library, Estates Branch, 1266 Golden Gate Boulevard, West Naples, Florida 34120, and Collier County Growth Management, 2885 Horseshoe Drive South, Naples, Florida 34104. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Collier County and the FDOT extends to the public an opportunity to express their views concerning the preferred alternatives for the PD&E study conducted for the Golden Gate Estates bridges. Preferred alternatives under consideration consist of new bridge crossings at previously mentioned locations. These area and corridor enhancements will provide operational and safety improvements, better emergency response times, evacuation capabilities, and service NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING O indicates new bridge crossing capabilities to the surrounding area. The increased con- nectivity provided by these improvements will also increase the efficiency of services provided to the subdi- vision and allow for more alternative travel routes for resi- dents. The project also includes some minor roadway enhance- ments along the three streets. Additional easements or right-of-way are not anticipated. NEED INFORMATION? HAVE COMMENTS? PLEASE CONTACT Collier County Project Manager Gary Putaansuu, P.E. (239) 252-8192 GaryPutaansuu@colliergov.net Golden Gate Estate Bridges Gary Putaansuu, P.E. 40 Collier County 2885 South Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Americans with Disabilities Act Persons with disabilities who may require special accommodations at the meeting under the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, or persons who require translation services (free of charge) should contact Gary Putaansuu, P.E., Project Manager, at (239) 252-8192 or by e-mail at GaryPutaansuu@colliergov.net, at least seven (7) days before the meeting. Title VI Compliance This project is developed in compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and related statutes. Public participation is solicited without regard to race, color, national origin, age, sex, religion, disability or family status. HNTB Collier County I Immokalee Road at Randall Boulevard Intersection Improvements 51 Collier County Solicitation 21-7901 CoZlier County Administrative Services Department Procurement Services Division Form 5 Reference Questionnaire (USE ONE FORMFOR EA CHREQUIREDREFERENCE) Solicitation: 21-7901 ImmokaleeRoad atRandall Boulevard Intersection Improvements Reference Questionnaire for: HNTB Corporation (Name of Company Requesting Reference Information) (Name ofIndividuals Requesting Reference Information) Name: Mary Sheets, PE, CPM Company: Hillsborough County, Florida (Evaluator completing reference questionnaire) (Evaluator's Company completing reference) Email: SheetsMghillsborou county.org FAX: (813) 272-5231 Telephone: (813) 307-1793 Collier County has implemented a process that collects reference information on firms and their key personnel to be used in the selection of firms to perform this proj ect. The Name of the Company listed in the Subject above has listed you as a client forwhich theyhave previously performed work. Please completethe survey. Please rate each criteria to the best of yourknowledge on a scale of 1 to 10, with 10 representing that you were very satisfied (and would hire the firm/individual again) and 1 representing that you were very unsatisfied (andwould never hire the firm/individual again). Ifyou do not have sufficient knowledge o fpast perfonnance in a particular area, leaveit blankandthe item orform will be scored 11 0." Project Description: Miscellaneous Professional Engineering Services Contract Completion Date: On goin g Project Budget: $6,000,000 contract amount ProjectNumberofDays: 1,460 Item Criteria Score (must be complete 1 Ability to manage the project costs (minimize change orders to scope). 9 2 Ability to maintain project schedule (complete on -time or early). 10 3 Quality of work. 9 4 Quality ofconsultative adviceprovided onthe project. 10 5 Professionalism andability tomanage personnel. 10 6 Project administration (completed documents, finalinvoice, finalproduct turnover; invoices; manuals orgoingforward documentation, etc.) 8 7 Ability to verbally communicate and document information clearly and succinctly. 10 8 Ability to managerisks and unexpected project circumstances. 9 9 Ability to follow contract documents, policies, procedures, rules, regulations, etc. 9 10 Overallcomfort levelwith hiringthe companyin the future (customer satisfaction). 10 TOTAL SCORE OF ALL ITEMS 94 52 ***UPDATED JANUARY 28, 2020*** Collier County Government I Solicitation 21-7901 III Or f L', .� � � 4 71 Zd low 9' Redesigned mast arms were required forth is intersection improvementIM!. ry - fa The RaceTrack Rd./Reptron Blvd. intersection required utility improvements, bicycle and —� pedestrian accommodations, and improved turning movement geometries. < < < < - - - �.�: �. r N The intersection of Sheldon Road included accommodating significant vehicular movements and accommodating planned future improvements Collier County Solicitation 21-7901 CoZlier County Administrative Services Department Procurement Services Division Form 5 Reference Questionnaire (USE ONE FORMFOR EA CHREQUIREDREFERENCE) Solicitation: 21-7901 ImmokaleeRoad atRandall Boulevard Intersection Improvements Reference Questionnaire for: HNTB Corporation (Name of Company Requesting Reference Information) (Name ofIndividuals Requesting Reference Information) Name: Joan M. Rice, PE Company: Pinellas County (Evaluator completing reference questionnaire) (Evaluator's Company completing reference) Email: jricenapinellascounty.org FAX: n/a Telephone: 727464-8610 Collier County has implemented a process that collects reference information on firm sand their keypersonnel to be used in the selection of firms to perform this project The Name of the Company listed in the Subject above has listed you as a client for which they have previously performed work. Please complete the survey. Please rate each criteria to the best of your knowledge on a scale of 1 to 10, with 10 representing that you were very satisfied (and would hire the firm/individual again) and 1 representing that you were very unsatisfied (andwould never hire the firm/individual again). Ifyou do not have sufficient knowledge ofpast perfonnance in a particular area, leaveit blankandthe item orform will be scored 11 0." Project Description: Belleair Road from Keene Road to US 19 MultimodalFeasibly StuyCompletionDate: Dec 31.2019 Project Budget: $199,942.00 Project Number of Days: Item Criteria Score (must be complete 1 Ability to manage the project costs (minimize change orders to scope). 10 2 Ability to maintain project schedule (complete on -time or early). 9 3 Quality of work. 9 4 Quality ofconsultative adviceprovided onthe project. 10 5 Professionalism andability tomanage personnel. 10 6 Project administration (completed documents, finalinvoice, finalproduct turnover; invoices; manuals orgoingforward documentation, etc.) 9 7 Ability to verbally communicate and document information clearly and succinctly. 10 8 Ability to managerisks and unexpected project circumstances. 9 9 Ability to follow contract documents, policies, procedures, rules, regulations, etc. 10 10 Overallcomfort levelwith hiringthe companyin the future (customer satisfaction). 10 TOTAL SCORE OF ALL ITEMS 96 54 ***UPDATED JANUARY 28, 2020*** Avn�# ��Iii.NE :11 AN ? 7 W-', HNTB Collier County I Immokalee Road at Randall Boulevard Intersection Improvements 55 Collier County Solicitation 21-7901 Collier County Administrative Services Department Procurement Services Division Form 5 Reference Questionnaire (USE ONE FORM FOR EACH REQUIRED REFERENCE) Solicitation: 21-7901 Lnmokalee Road at Randall Boulevard Intersection Improvements Reference Questionnaire for: HNTB Corporation (Name of Company Requesting Reference Information) Cristina Jackson, PE (Name of Individuals Requesting Reference Information) Name: Mary Sheets, PE, CPM 5-26-2021 Company: Hillsborough County, Florida (Evaluator completing reference questionnaire) (Evaluator's Company completing reference) Email: FAX: (813) 272-5231 Telephone: (813) 307-1793 Collier has implemented a process that collects reference information on firms and their key personnel to be used in the selection of firms to perform this project. The Name of the Company listed in the Subject above has listed you as a client for which they have previously performed work. Please complete the survey. Please rate each criteria to the best of your knowledge on a scale of 1 to 10, with 10 representing that you were very satisfied (and would hire the firm/individual again) and 1 representing that you were very unsatisfied (and would never hire the firm/individual again). If you do not have sufficient knowledge of past performance in a particular area, leave it blank and the item or form will be scored "0." Project Description: Bruce B. Downs from Pebble Creek to County Line Rd. Completion Date: 7/16/2019 (Approved As-Builts) Project Budget: $17,070,000 (Est. Const.) roject Number of Days: 1095 days (approximate construction days) Item Criteria Score (must be completed) 1 Ability to manage the project costs (minimize change orders to scope). 9 2 Ability to maintain project schedule (complete on -time or early). 8 3 Quality of work. 9 4 Quality of consultative advice provided on the project. 10 5 Professionalism and ability to manage personnel. 10 6 Project administration (completed documents, final invoice, final product turnover; invoices; manuals or going forward documentation, etc.) 9 7 Ability to verbally communicate and document information clearly and succinctly. 10 8 Ability to manage risks and unexpected project circumstances. 10 9 Ability to follow contract documents, policies, procedures, rules, regulations, etc. 10 10 Overall comfort level with hiring the company in the future (customer satisfaction). 9 TOTAL SCORE OF ALL ITEMS 94 56 ***UPDATED JANUARY 28, 2020*** Collier County Government Solicitation 21-7901 i I I a� The Bruce B Downs Blvd. design involved significant traffic analysis, drainage, miscellaneous structures, bicycle/pedestrian improvements, and roadway design efforts for widening this facility from four to eight lanes. Collier County Solicitation 21-7901 Collier County Administrative Services Department Procurement Services Division Form 5 Reference Questionnaire (USE ONE FORMFOR EA CHREQUIREDREFERENCE) Solicitation: 21-7901 ImmokaleeRoad atRandall Boulevard Intersection Improvements Reference Questionnaire for: HNTB Corporation (Name of Company Requesting Reference Information) David Hubbard, PE (Name ofIndividuals Requesting Reference Information) Name: Jola Olbinska, PE (Evaluator completing reference questionnaire) Email: jola.obinskanatampagov.net FAX: Company: City ofTampa, Florida (Evaluator's Company completing reference) 274-8430 Telephone: (813) 274-8122 Collier County has implemented a process thatcollects reference informationon firms andtheirkey personnel to be used in the selection of firm s to perform this project. The Name ofthe Company listed in the Subject above has listed you as a chen t forwhich they havepreviously performed work. Please complete the survey. Please rate each criteria to the best of your knowledge on as c ale of 1 to 10, with 10 representing that you were very satisfied (and would hire the firm/individual again) and 1 representing that you were very unsatisfied (and would never hire the firm/individual again). If you do not have sufficient knowledge of past performance in a particular area, leave it blank andthe item or form willbe scored "0." Project Description: Tampa Downtown Resurf.CompleteSts. CompletionDate:Ongoing Project Budget: $1,547,610 (est.) Project Number of Days: 73 0 (al2prox..) Item Criteria Score (must be complete 1 Ability to manage the project costs (minimize change orders to scope). 10 2 Ability to maintain project schedule (complete on -time or early). 10 3 Quality of work. 10 4 Qua lity of consultative advice provided on the project. 10 5 Professionalism and ability to manage personnel. 10 6 Project administration (completed documents, final invoice, finalproduct turnover; invoices; manuals or going forward documentation, etc.) 10 7 Ability to verbally communicate and document information clearly and succinctly. 10 8 Ability to manage risks and unexpected project circumstances. 10 9 Ability to follow contract documents,policies,procedures, rules, regulations, etc. 10 10 Overall comfort level with hiring the company in the future (customer satisfaction). 10 TOTAL SCORE OF ALL ITEMS 100 O.3 ***UPDATED JANUARY 28, 2020*** Collier County Government I Solicitation 21-7901 F41 HNTB's design improves cyclist safety in three ways: providing bike lanes that are physically separated from vehicular traffic; increasing cyclist prominence at intersections; and reducing vehicle/cyclist conflict points at intersections. Collier County Solicitation 21-7901 CoZlier County Administrative Services Department Procurement Services Division Form 5 Reference Questionnaire (USE ONE FORMFOR EA CHREQUIREDREFERENCE) Solicitation: 21-7901 ImmokaleeRoad atRandall Boulevard Intersection Improvements Reference Questionnaire for: HNTB Corporation (Name of Company Requesting Reference Information) John Dewey, PE (Name ofIndividuals Requesting Reference Information) Name: Cleo Babb (Evaluator completing reference questionnaire) Email: cleo.babbAdot.state.fl.us FAX: (813) 975-6738 Company: Florida Department ofTransportation District 7 (Evaluator's Company completing reference) 13) 520-9794 Collier County has implemented a process that collects reference information on firm s and their keypersonnel to be used in the selection of firms to perform this proj ect The Name of the Company listed in the Subj ect above has listed you a s a client forwhich theyhave previously performed work. Plea se completethe survey. Plea se rate each criteria to the best of yourknowledge on a scale of 1 to 10, with 10 representing that you were very satisfied (and would hire the firm/individual again) and 1 representing that you were very unsatisfied (andwould never hire the firm/individual again). Ifyou do not have sufficient knowledge ofpast perfonnance in a particular area, leaveit blankandthe item orform will be scored 11 0." Proj ect Description: CR 5 7 8 (County Line Rd.) CompletionDate: Ongoing Project Budget: $20,155,312.41 ProjectNumberof Days: Item Criteria Score (must be complete 1 Ability to manage the project costs (minimize change orders to scope). 10 2 Ability to maintain project schedule (complete on -time or early). 10 3 Quality of work. 10 4 Quality ofconsultative adviceprovided onthe project. 10 5 Professionalism andability tomanage personnel. 10 6 Project administration (completed documents, finalinvoice, finalproduct turnover; invoices; manuals orgoingforward documentation, etc.) 10 7 Ability to verbally communicate and document information clearly and succinctly. 10 8 Ability to managerisks and unexpected project circumstances. 10 9 Ability to follow contract documents, policies, procedures, rules, regulations, etc. 10 10 Overallcomfort levelwith hiringthe companyin the future (customer satisfaction). 10 TOTAL SCORE OF ALL ITEMS 100 .1 ***UPDATED JANUARY 28, 2020*** Collier County Government I Solicitation 21-7901 Is Pedestrian safety improvements at the CR 578 intersection is critical to the project's success. Collier County Solicitation 21-7901 CoZlier County Administrative Services Department Procurement Services Division Form 5 Reference Questionnaire (USE ONE FORMFOR EA CHREQUIREDREFERENCE) Solicitation: 21-7901 ImmokaleeRoad atRandall Boulevard Intersection Improvements Reference Questionnaire for: HNTB Corporation (Name of Company Requesting Reference Information) Cristina Jackson, PE (Name ofIndividuals Requesting Reference Information) Name: Pia Cormier, CPM Company: FDOT, District 7 (Evaluator completing reference questionnaire) (Evaluator's Company completing reference) Email: pia.cvrmier(&dot.state.fl.us FAX:N/A Telephone: (813) 975-6176 Collier County has implemented a process that collects reference information on firms and their keypersonnel to be used in the selection of firms to perform this proj ect. The Name of the Company listed in the Subject above has listed you as a client forwhich theyhave previously performed work. Please completethe survey. Please rate each criteria to the best of yourknowledge on a scale of 1 to 10, with 10 representing that you were very satisfied (and would hire the firm/individual again) and 1 representing that you were very unsatisfied (andwould never hire the firm/individual again). Ifyou do not have sufficient knowledge ofpast perfonnance in a particular area, leaveitblankandtheitem orform will be scored 110." Project Description: SR 52 from US 41 to CR 5 8 1. CompletionDate:Ongoing Project Budget: $101,791,941.85 Est. Const($10,616,010 Designn)ProjectNumber of Days: 3 ,200 (al2orox.) Item Criteria Score (must be complete 1 Ability to manage the project costs (minimize change orders to scope). 9 2 Ability to maintain project schedule (complete on -time or early). 9 3 Quality of work. 9 4 Quality ofconsultative adviceprovided onthe project. 9 5 Professionalism andability tomanage personnel. 10 6 Project administration (completed documents, finalinvoice, finalproduct turnover; invoices; manuals orgoingforward documentation, etc.) 9 7 Ability to verbally communicate and document information clearly and succinctly. 9 8 Ability to managerisks and unexpected project circumstances. 9 9 Ability to follow contract documents, policies, procedures, rules, regulations, etc. 10 10 Overallcomfort levelwith hiringthe companyin the future (customer satisfaction). 10 TOTAL SCORE OF ALL ITEMS 93 ***UPDATED JANUARY 28, 2020*** 62 Collier County Government I Solicitation 21-7901 The SR 52 design involved improvements to a two-lane rural road with significant utility coordination required. k A Bridge Hydraulics Report and Location Hydraulics Report were created to identify necessary bridge culvert improvements. Collier County Solicitation 21-7901 CoZlier County Administrative Services Department Procurement Services Division Form 5 Reference Questionnaire (USE ONE FORMFOR EA CHREQUIREDREFERENCE) Solicitation: 21-7901 ImmokaleeRoad atRandall Boulevard Intersection Improvements Reference Questionnaire for: HNTB Corporation (Name of Company Requesting Reference Information) David Hubbard, PE (Name ofIndividuals Requesting Reference Information) Name: Kevin Lee Company: Atkins/FDOT District Seven GEC (Evaluator completing reference questionnaire) (Evaluator's Company completing reference) Email: kevin.lee@dot.state.fl.us FAX: N/A Telephone: (813) 975-6426 Collier County has implemented a process that collects reference information on firms and their keypersonnel to be used in the selection of firms to perform this project The Name of the Company listed in the Subject above has listed you as a client forwhich theyhave previously performed work. Please completethe survey. Please rate each criteria to the best of yourknowledge on a scale of 1 to 10, with 10 representing that you were very satisfied (and would hire the firm/individual again) and 1 representing that you were very unsatisfied (andwould never hire the firm/individual again). Ifyou do not have sufficient knowledge ofpast perfonnance in a particular area, leaveit blankandthe item orform will be scored 11 0." Project Description: SR 60 from Valrico Rdto Dover Rd Project Budget: $29,450,381 (est. construction) CompletionDate: Ongoing Project Number of Days: 2000+ Item Criteria Score (must be complete 1 Ability to manage the project costs (minimize change orders to scope). 10 2 Ability to maintain project schedule (complete on -time or early). 10 3 Quality of work. 10 4 Quality ofconsultative adviceprovided onthe project. 10 5 Professionalism andability tomanage personnel. 10 6 Project administration (completed documents, finalinvoice, finalproduct turnover; invoices; manuals orgoingforward documentation, etc.) 10 7 Ability to verbally communicate and document information clearly and succinctly. 10 8 Ability to managerisks and unexpected project circumstances. 10 9 Ability to follow contract documents, policies, procedures, rules, regulations, etc. 10 10 Overallcomfort levelwith hiringthe companyin the future (customer satisfaction). 10 TOTAL SCORE OF ALL ITEMS 100 64 ***UPDATED JANUARY 28, 2020*** Collier County Government I Solicitation 21-7901 Collier County Solicitation 21-7901 CoZlier County Administrative Services Department Procurement Services Division Form 5 Reference Questionnaire (USE ONE FORMFOR EA CHREQUIREDREFERENCE) Solicitation: 21-7901 ImmokaleeRoad atRandall Boulevard Intersection Improvements Reference Questionnaire for: HNTB Corporation (Name of Company Requesting Reference Information) Doug Burkhart, PE (Name ofIndividuals Requesting Reference Information) Name:BrianBlair Company: FDOT, District 1 (Evaluator completing reference questionnaire) (Evaluator's Company completing reference) Email: Brian.Blair(adot.state.fl.us FAX:N/A Telephone: 863-519-2676 Collier County has implemented a process that collects reference information on firms and their keypersonnel to be used in the selection of firms to perform this proj ect. The Name of the Company listed in the Subject above has listed you as a client for which they have previously performed work. Please completethe survey. Please rate each criteria to the best of yourknowledge on a scale of 1 to 10, with 10 representing that you were very satisfied (and would hire the firm/individual again) and 1 representing that you were very unsatisfied (andwould never hire the firm/individual again). Ifyou do not have sufficient knowledge ofpast perfonnance in a particular area, leaveit blankandthe item orform will be scored 110." Project Description: US27from Ritchie RdtoBarryRd. CompletionDate: Project Budget: $15,688,628Est. Const.($3,190,373Desig_n)ProjectNumberofDays: 460(aanrox.) Item Criteria Score (scale 1-10) 1 Ability to manage the project costs (minimize change orders to scope). 9 2 Ability to maintain project schedule (complete on -time or early). 9 3 Quality of work. 9 4 Quality ofconsultative adviceprovided onthe project. 9 5 Professionalism andability tomanage personnel. 10 6 Project administration (completed documents, finalinvoice, finalproduct turnover; invoices; manuals orgoingforward documentation, etc.) 9 7 Ability to verbally communicate and document information clearly and succinctly. 10 8 Ability to managerisks and unexpected project circumstances. 9 9 Ability to follow contract documents, policies, procedures, rules, regulations, etc. 10 10 Overallcomfort levelwith hiringthe companyin the future (customer satisfaction). 10 TOTAL SCORE OF ALL ITEMS 94 ***UPDATED JANUARY 28, 2020*** 66 Collier County Government Solicitation 21-7901 -JEL_. rIr I he design on US 27, specifically at Barry Road, A"ame access management, roadway geometric, drainage and traffic engineering challenges that are found at Randall Blvd. and Immokalee Rd. Collier County Government I Solicitation 21-7901 HNTB'S RESOURCES AVAILABLE TO COMPLETE SERVICES REQUESTED Our approach to design leverages our technical expertise, stakeholder relationships, and proven ability to deliver a technically sound design focused on safety for all users. We understand that successful project delivery involves a detailed project management plan, quality plan, communications and coordination plan, and technical plan. Our approach to project management, communication and coordination, and quality can be found in the "Approach to Meet Time and Budget" section. ROADWAY DESIGN: Our approach to the roadway design enhances the PD&E concept by reducing construction cost and right-of-way needs while not precluding future improvements. Our proposed design employs "superstreet" principles to facilitate the major movements through the intersection with a simple, two-phase signal phasing. This innovative concept extends the service life of the intersection by maximizing green times for major movements. It also provides left turns from Randall Blvd. using lead -lag signal timing to simplify the signal without impacting the Immokalee Rd. alignment. In discussions with Trinity Scott, we understand future development along the north side of Immokalee Rd will not access 4ch St NE. The low traffic volume on 4ch St NE allows for the elimination of that intersection leg, eliminating a wrong -way driving safety concern while improving signal efficiency. Through coordination with Collier Area Transit (CAT), we propose additional capacity in the right turn lane on Randall Blvd. to support requested future transit accommodations. Adding signalization to the U-turn at the Publix driveway on Immokalee Rd. will improve access to the properties adjacent to the intersection and improve the signal timing for traffic at the northern leg of the Randall Blvd./Immokalee Rd. intersection. In addition to the median U-turn concept, we propose modifying the Randall Blvd. typical section by adding a 10' -shared-use path instead of introducing non -continuous bike lanes adjacent to traffic to increase safety for vulnerable users of Randall Blvd. This change will shift the alignment to the north, which reduces the cost of the future flyover without increasing needed right-of-way. PD&E Interim Concept (Inset) Proposed Intersection Design Benefits 1. Two-phase signal design maximizes efficiency. 2. Shared -use path instead of on -street bike lanes improves bicyclist safety. 3. Maintaining an emergency signal at the fire station reduces construction costs. 4. Reducing the gas station right-of-way take lowers acquisition costs. 5. Extending the right turn lane accommodates a bus stop per CAT request. 6. Improved mobility and safety by including CAT requested bus stop. 7. U-turn design accommodates a WB 62 design vehicle and improves efficiency. 8. Reduced interim construction cost by avoiding relocation of the transmission line. ACCESS MANAGEMENT: As this area of Collier County continues to grow and develop, some of the planned developments along both Randall Blvd. and Immokalee Rd. will impact access management within the project limits. Our thorough understanding of context -sensitivity, appropriate application of Collier Access Management Resolution 13-257, and agility when approaching new and changing stakeholder needs will ensure seamless integration of access changes as they evolve over the project's life. HNTB 68 Collier County Government I Solicitation 21-7901 TRAFFIC OPERATIONS: Through our technical expertise, our Traffic Modeling Lead, Govardhan Muthyalagari, PE, PTOE, was able to identify several significant traffic safety and operational improvements when utilizing our proposed design alternative. When comparing PD&E traffic numbers to the proposed design, traffic operations for the 2045 design year improve from a LOS F to a LOS C for both the AM and PM peak hours. Our proposed intersection concept improves the intersection capacity and has 50% fewer conflict points (32 vs. 16). With the smaller intersection footprint, pedestrian safety is also substantially enhanced. Similarly, with the ultimate concept, the operations analysis for the 2045 design year will be LOS B for both the AM and PM peak hours with the intersection delay of 14.8 sec/veh for the AM peak hour and 13.3 sec/veh for the PM peak hour, a 44 — 50% reduction in delay when compared to the recommended PD&E alternative. Our proposed interim and ultimate concepts also work in coordination with the upstream and downstream intersections on Immokalee Rd. and Randall Blvd., including the proposed signal at 8th St. NE, to further enhance the system operations within the area of influence. SIGNALS AND ITS: As the former Pinellas County ITS Department Head, Ken Jacobs, TSOS, RSP, brings unmatched technical expertise in the areas of safety, TSM&O and ITS design. Our proposed interim concept requires the replacement of the signal mast arms at the southwest and northeast corners of the intersection. Modifications for special emphasis intersection crosswalks and countdown pedestrian heads are recommended for additional safety improvements. Our proposed new mast arm at the northeast corner will replace the existing CCTV camera and be connected to the controller cabinet. The existing fiber along the east side of Immokalee Rd. will need to be rerouted. HNTB's technical expertise in emerging technologies will ensure connected vehicle compatibility with controller cabinet upgrades. DRAINAGE: As a former drainage engineer with SWFWMD, Chris Kuzlo, PE, is ideally positioned to serve as the drainage lead for this design project and brings important industry relationships for permitting approval. The project is located within the Big Cypress Basin watershed and the FDEP Water Body Identification Number 3278S which is impaired for dissolved oxygen (nutrients). The improvements will encroach on the 100-year event Floodplain as identified by the FEMA FIRMs. Floodplain impacts will be evaluated and accommodated in the Floodplain Compensation Site (FPC). Flooding issues identified along Randall Blvd. between Immokalee Rd. and 8th Street NE by Collier County maintenance staff will be addressed in the roadway design. The available LIDAR information indicates a low roadway profile west of 8th Street NE, which should be raised by approximately one foot at the lowest location to meet the County's Level of Service (LOS) for the 25-year storm event. A Pond Siting Report will be prepared to identify the additional Stormwater Management Facility (SMF) alternatives to the PD&E concept. Emphasis will be placed on the Environmental Look Around (ELA) approach to identify innovative regional SMF solutions that could utilize existing Collier County properties and maximize the use of the existing SMFs serving Basins 8 and 9 along Immokalee Rd. Acquisition of the right of way (ROW) for the ultimate flyover will require coordination with SFWMD regarding the ROW occupancy permit requirements as the Cocohatchee Canal realignment, double 9 x 9-foot bridge culvert extension, relocation of the Control Structure CORK # 1 and the relocation of the Hydrometeorological Station GOLD.846 will be required. A preliminary Bridge Hydraulics Report will be performed to support the ultimate bridge culvert extension and canal realignment. STRUCTURES: Our structures team provides a proven history of delivering quality structural designs to Collier County. Led by Sadie Dalton, PE, our team recognizes the importance of sound structural design complemented by cost -saving innovation. Proposed Flyover: To accommodate the ultimate improvements, we recommend providing a flyover ramp from westbound Randall Blvd. to westbound Immokalee Rd. (CR 846) consisting of two 11-foot lanes, a 10- foot outside shoulder, and an 8-foot inside shoulder. Given the radius of curvature, 42-inch single slope traffic railings will be provided for added safety resulting in an overall width of 43 feet. The proposed 3-span bridge is approximately 320 feet in length and has wrap -around MSE walls at the abutments. Compared to the PD&E concept, our innovative approach to the intersection and flyover bridge adjusts the locations of the bridge ends and optimizes the span configuration to require only three spans and accommodate the use of Florida -I Beams. Skewing the proposed intermediate piers so they do not overhang the underlying roadway allows them to be designed as standard multi -column units with a concrete cap. Flyover Feature No. of Spans PD&E Concept 4 HNTB Concept 3 Approx. Length of Bride 630 ft* 320 ft Max. Span Length 165 ft 135 ft Beam Type Curved Steel Florida -I Beam Beam Spacing Uniform Flared Pier Type Integral Multi -column Pier Orientation Radial Skewed Bridge Construction Cost $175* / s . ft. $150 / s . ft. Estimated Bridge Cost $4.41 M* $2.1 M *Based on the LRE in the PD&E Preliminary Engineering Report PD&E Flyover Concept HNTB Flyover Concept This approach ensures minimum vertical clearance requirements are met within the constraints of the vertical profile geometry. Both driven pile and drilled shaft foundations will be investigated at the intermediate pier to minimize traffic interruptions. NNTB .o Collier County Government I Solicitation 21-7901 Box Culvert: The existing concrete box culvert channeling Corkscrew Canal under Immokalee Road is a dual cell 9-foot by 9-foot box culvert, 165 feet long. The bridge inspection report indicates a Sufficiency Rating of 70, a Health Index of 54.5, with minor deterioration. The low ratings likely result from sediment in the bottom of each cell and heavy debris at the water control structure. Since the proposed interim improvements fit within the footprint of the existing culvert and it is in good structural condition, improvements to the culvert are not required in the interim phase. To accommodate the proposed flyover in the ultimate condition, we recommend extending the existing culvert by approximately 90 feet on the north end. This will require realigning the existing canals and relocating the drainage control structure. The existing pedestrian/bicycle railing at the south headwall will also be investigated to determine if replacement or an upgrade is needed to meet current standards. Our proposed design will also allow an opportunity to address any outstanding maintenance items and incorporate accelerated bridge construction (ABC) techniques. UTILITIES: The following Utility Agency Owners (UAOs) have been identified within the project corridor: CenturyLink; Florida Power and Light (FPL) Dist.& Trans.; Collier County Traffic; Summit Broadband; Collier County Utilities; TECO Peoples Gas; and Comcast. Brent Postma (ELE) will initiate coordination with the UAOs and will work closely with the design team to identify potential conflicts and develop solutions that eliminate or minimize HA(') impacts. Obtaining overhead electric outages will be challenging as FPL has a substation that services this area just west of the project limits. Allowable back feed timeframes and durations will also need to be noted within FPL's utility work schedule to give the selected roadway contractor ample notification to avoid delay claims during construction. OSHA clearances and service point locations will be vetted with FPL to ensure there are no issues when construction commences. Outage arrangements for light pole or signalization placement will be depicted in the utility owner's utility work schedule. SUE: Pete Mattson (ELE) will lead a team to provide Subsurface Utility Engineering (SUE). The use of SUE early in the design phase can eliminate or mitigate utility relocations that would affect the project schedule, significantly reduce relocation costs, prevent unexpected delays and enhance safety. ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS: Michelle Rutishauser will serve as the Environmental Lead for this project. Due to proposed design changes from the Preferred PD&E Alternative, the project area will be reevaluated for impacts to wetlands/surface waters and protected species and their habitat. The HNTB team will work to minimize and reduce wetland/surface water impacts. Commitments made in the approved PD&E Study identified the purchase of Panther Habitat Units (PHUs) to compensate for the loss of panther habitat. As the design of the project is refined, Florida panther PHUs will be re -calculated and the HNTB Team will re -initiate Section 7 consultation with USFWS during permitting. An updated Natural Resource Evaluation will be completed to document potential impacts and permitting strategies to natural resources. A state permit will be obtained from SFWMD and a federal permit will be obtained from the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP). A Cultural Resource Assessment Survey Report Addendum will be completed to document any historical/cultural or archaeological resources within the project limits that were not previously identified within the Area of Potential Effect. A contamination screening through the FDEP online database will be completed to document any new spills or clean-ups that have taken place since the PD&E Study was approved. Additionally, a Level II contamination field assessment will be conducted at the one `Medium' site identified within the PD&E Study as well as all proposed stormwater management facilities. PD&E RE-EVALUATION: A re-evaluation of the PD&E Study is required based on the proposed design changes. The HNTB Team will complete all technical documents and any agency coordination necessary to support the re-evaluation. The Design -Change and Right -of -Way Authorization Re- evaluation can be combined into one document to expedite the review process and therefore only require one approval from the FDOT Office of Environmental Management (OEM) on behalf of FHWA. Additionally, a Construction Advertisement Re-evaluation is required prior to the County letting the project for construction. Since all design changes will be documented in the prior re-evaluation, the Construction Advertisement Re- evaluation effort will be very streamlined. Both re-evaluations will be entered into the Statewide Environmental Project Tracker (SWEPT), of which HNTB is a proficient authorized user and will be submitted for independent peer review prior to submittal to the County and FDOT for approval. NNTB w J cl 0 w x U U U W O w CL w 0 CL O: IL a a a I a a d a CO ? > > T T > T > > j, > > T T > > T > T > T > T > T > > N > > > '> (6 f0 l6 19 f6 16 (6 10 16 1O 16 f0 (6 10 f6 16 19 16 f0 1O f6 16 19 (6 16 (6 16 f6 a a a a a a a a a a s a a a a aO a a aOO a ° O0 0 0 0 0 o n o o n o n o 0 o n o o n o n o 0 0 0 0 0 n o 0 0 0 0 N O N m V V M M M lD O ci Ot o .-I N V I� r-I M 00 V M a s W Ol N N n Ol 00 W m O O 3 a, v > c 3 U c N y N 3 ca w y E c 4 > '> ° m '> v w 2 > v z E E o O « u = m c Y 3« a c — v v E- >> .> o ac E c C (a aE co E E a >w U U O c W yO. O a C N K\ W Y otj C uNOi Q i O H U .6 Z. L N C en o N W C O o6 > 3 . c 'a>i N ° N u n C C 3 n c oif oc v m c a E c m c c> v cluoo > ? a m u ar c v > c E c N 0 U > E° o E L o E U Y V E U N N U m` c W J o C C C o E > c o > O U O U Q J f0 W C c h C Q Co y f0 Oc0 O C co m N C Do a? N J 0 V1 O ry O C : C T d C C L > C U C C O oZj i' N O t- m N O. Gp O N O a a° O. c O r+ > K CO O O o x i.+ a N pCp N C\ c> C m c N O Q O N ?> E c O O a '� o > y ? Oq u v m ` ra o 00 c 0 c e c e o e O 3 v C O O o p Ol w I1q x w O n C N m in 'O o v aC c > ° O Z' ?j y Q m u u c c> c QC C ` 0 C 0 @ .-i 3 .--I .--I U .--I O .-i N o h00 N N N C d m C U > E- v c E v E (b E u+ N J 3 n a o> c E L 0 m v 3 m m u a a u a v w y a a a a a o v a m a w w L m' ° m v Q °' =_ w o v .oIN G! O > N o 2 U ¢o i c O K O. ii ri a O L N K D_ J O L J O L o. L L L a M O. n l° O. Vt O. O. 0_ O. C O V c L f0 D a ii D_ O O _ 1A O. Vo U w > W O c— O U w C Z 1�A W w d LL Collier County Government I Solicitation 21-7901 HNTB'S CONCEPT AND APPROACH TO MANAGING THE OVERALL COST OF THE PROJECT 'INTB HNTB's 4for4 Promise I The foundation of a successful quality project is HNTB's 4for4 promise: quality work, on time, within budget and to the County's satisfaction. We have done 0(OualityWork this by being well -versed industry leaders in final roadway and structure designs, developing 4 : 0(OnTime solutions for complicated challenges by developing detailed work plans which provide the ability On Budget 00( To(the Client's Satisfaction on Every Project to manage and track the progression of individual project components complemented by efficient production and review activity processes. PROJECT MANAGEMENT The ability to efficiently manage time and budget begins with effective project management. All project components, led by HNTB or our subconsultants, will utilize detailed work plans for planning, tracking, and managing both schE and budget. Ed Ponce's attention to detail, technical excellence, communication style, and hanc experience developing and reviewing work provides the ideal qualities to lead the HNT team and ensure all deliverables are submi on time and on budget. Ed's experience lea design teams with strict production schedul, requirements for FDOT provides an understanding of the importance of proactiv management to ensure that critical path act are initially identified in the task work plan a are executed in an efficient manner. Our proposed work plan aligns staff with task needs, availability and project budget for all activities. Ed's commitment to proactive project management includes regular meetings with discipline leads for continuous interdisciplinary coordination and facilitates adherence to task schedule and budget controls. Additionally, Ed will lead monthly internal project review meetings with office executive leadership to review budget and schedule adherence, quality, future efforts and staffing needs to ensure this project has the resources necessary to remain on schedule and budget. Our proven ability to maintain time and budget is reflected in the scores found in the Project Reference Sheets, located in the Section 3 criteria. The change order history on recent projects can be found in the table below. Client Change afer Grade: Schedule History on Similar Client Grade: Budget Projects Number of Change Orders e Order Deta ft�: ;A Eleven Bride Replacements 10 10 4 Client expanded scope and schedule Belleair Road Design 9 10 0 No change orders Golden Gate Estates PD&E 10 9 0 No change orders Tampa Complete Streets Design 10 10 0 No change orders SR 60 Design 10 10 1 Client expanded scope NNTB 72 Collier County Government I Solicitation 21-7901 ASSIGNMENT OF PERSONNEL HNTB will serve as the lead consultant and has long-established working relationships with our proposed subconsultant team. Ed will begin by coordinating with discipline leaders to outline all anticipated project task activities and to identify project team members capable of completing each of the activities in an efficient and effective manner. Each of our discipline teams will include experienced quality reviewers to produce a quality set of construction plans and PD&E re-evaluation documents. HNTB provides the County with an ideal blend of senior staff who have extensive knowledge of the County's standards and procedures and junior staff who will work to efficiently produce plans or provide support services. Successful examples of this approach in the delivery of similar intersection design projects at several intersections in Hillsborough County include Racetrack Road/Reptron Blvd., Memorial Highway/Montague St., Sheldon Rd.IWestwind Dr. and the resurfacing projects along Benjamin Rd. and N. Wilder Rd. COMMUNICATION AND COORDINATION While coordination between disciplines, stakeholders and the project team is vital to the successful completion of a task, coordination with the different County departments during scoping to confirm project goal alignment and safety aspects is also vital for schedule adherence. As a PM who brings experience leading multiple disciplines that contributed to design projects at FDOT, Ed has the proven ability to be a catalyst to proactively foster communication and coordination on this project. The second benefit for early and continuous interdepartmental coordination is the reduction in time required to complete the design due to the resolution of issues in a real-time workflow, rather than in a work -submit -comment scenario. HNTB's proven approach values technical excellence and sound design principles as much as the coordination of facilities that compete for the limited right-of-way space (i.e., ADA requirements, signal foundations, utilities, and drainage). As Collier County's PM, Dennis McCoy, PE, will be kept informed on all project status updates, with focused attention on milestones and all deliverables. Mr. McCoy will be fully apprised of all project communication and will have access to any member of our team throughout the project life. Ed will provide progress reports throughout the project at the frequency preferred by Mr. McCoy. Ed Ponce will be the main point of contact for Mr. McCoy and county discipline personnel for any project issue coordination meetings will disseminate discipline activities to Ed for seamless project communication. QAIQC REVIEWS A critical component of maintaining the project schedule and budget is developing and adhering to a quality control plan that is tailored to this project. HNTB has established an in-house Quality Management System (QMS) that reflects our 3P QC approach: People, Process and Product. We offer people who possess the right technical skills, attitude and training for their assignments. Our processes include following project management procedures, communicating with other disciplines and managing decision making to ensure proper coordination happens on every aspect of this project. HNTB's product plan is based on o a well -established five -step Bluebeamprocess to verify all deliverables facilitates real-time proactive are thoroughly checked and collaboration between reviewed by qualified participants thr• ' • professionals for completeness, review process. accuracy, project -specific requirements, adherence to project goals, format, standards and guidelines, economy, constructability and maintainability. Our quality reviewers consist of experienced design professionals that regularly exhibit technical excellence on projects and also incorporate value -engineering principles to ensure the highest quality while also reducing the review time, schedule, and construction budgets. The QA component of our QMS focuses on the review process that is to be followed by our QC team and will be overseen by our Project Quality Manager (PQM), Shawn Stover, PE. The QA review will focus on the personnel assigned to the particular activity, filing system, quality of records being maintained, and adherence to policies and procedures. The reviews will be conducted at different intervals but will cover the entire contract time, from notice to proceed through post -design services. Our weekly internal project Bluebeam® reviews provide real-time simultaneous reviews with at -a - glance confirmation that all corrections have been addressed. HNTB's QC plan is a five -step structured check -and -balance system utilizing color -coded checking and back -checking. NNTB 73 Collier County Government I Solicitation 21-7901 CONTROLS TO MAINTAIN SCHEDULE AND BUDGET HNTB is intimately familiar with the various needs of project schedule development and utilization. HNTB's team includes technical schedule experts Mark Steele and Gala Rosborough, CEP, who provide an exceptional ability to effectively develop Oracle Primavera project schedules tailored to the County's needs. Maintaining an accurate project budget begins at the outset in creating a detailed resource -loaded work plan and schedule to ensure project needs are addressed and appropriate personnel is available. This detailed work plan provides an at -a -glance snapshot of every hour each person/ classification, activity, or task is anticipated to need for precise work planning and analysis before a project is initiated and budget tracking once executed. This sophisticated internal budget tracking system provides reports that describe project charges and a projected spend curve that is aligned with the project schedule. This budget tracking tool will be utilized on a daily, weekly, and monthly basis. This tool, along with our internal project review meetings, ensures appropriate resources are being applied to the project and are available on upcoming work efforts so that budget overruns or schedule slippage does not occur. PROJECT DELIVERY AND COST SAVINGS HNTB understands the County's budget constraints with an increasing demand for transportation improvements. To be responsive to this need, we continually look for opportunities for project cost savings for the County's consideration. Highlights of our recommendations that consider our proposed changes from the PD&E concept include: • Progress reports via virtual meetings allowing efficient use of technology • Implement automated Smart Work Zone data feed information for improved operational performance during construction and maintenance • Reduced Right -of -Way acquisition while maintaining compatibility with the Phase II improvements. • Evaluate opportunities to salvage existing asphalt pavement in reconstruction • Construction cost savings associated with our proposed bridge design: 1 9utlaet at Completion • 9 AC i Independent Esilmale at Comletion-IEAC I I t tr u r f I • OSr O W • ►; 4 * � +0 a n y +�} {ast Variance • Cy o " a Planned Value PV i,r E Earned Value - EV o Actual Cvst - AC Q I I �J1 Sthedure variaTv (t) - schedule Varip nce At SA i Syctl iWACO � Time (days) _ E.arnrd Srhrdula.-.ES r Actual Time • AT Planned Duration • PD independent Estrmote at C9mpllt QO - IEAC(Q HNTB's budget and tracking tool provides up-to-date information on the project's performance for the County. MOM - VarlMnce BY m0-1?ti06 ctt - o Reduces the number of bridge spans from four to three o Reduces the overall length of the bridge o Uses Florida -I Beams which have less maintenance than steel girders o Uses more MSE wall to reduce bridge length and costs o Uses prestressed beams rather than steel beams to eliminate the need to splice girders, provides simplified lifting/placement, and can accommodate squared beam ends • Streamline survey needs with supplemental survey from LiDAR, as -built plans, and field reviews • Streamline geotechnical needs with seasonal high-water information from existing permits, plans, and adjacent projects NNTB 74 Collier County Government I Solicitation 21-7901 HNTB will serve as the prime consultant for this contract from our office located in Tampa subconsultants: AB&B, Ardaman and Associates, ACI and Element Engineering. Office addresses for our team members are listed in the table to the right. All project team offices are located within the West Florida area which means we can be immediately responsive to any Collier County need. HNTB subconsultants are within close proximity to the project, bringing additional local knowledge of the project corridors, critical issues, and key stakeholder concerns. This allows our team to be proactive and immediately responsive to County needs. To facilitate virtual collaboration, HNTB's team also utilizes multiple virtual conferencing platforms such as Microsoft Teams, Cisco WebEx and Zoom to continue efficient project delivery. Proiect Activities: We recognize the importance of efficient project delivery developed with a thorough understanding of project issues. Our approach to balance these project drivers will blend both in - person meetings with remote coordination for efficient and effective project management and delivery. To effectively identify information needed to develop a final project scope and staff hours, minimize the potential for project change orders due to unforeseen issues, and present a thorough understanding of project issues and potential resolutions, key discipline leads and a representative from each of our subconsultants will conduct a team field review to identify key project issues that need to be considered for areas such as survey, traffic data collection, drainage, and safety analysis immediately upon notification of selection. These issues will then be discussed during final scope development with the County and be confirmed during our in -person project kick off meeting with county staff to gain consensus on design objectives and identify a path to issue resolution. In addition, HNTB will be supported by our local Office :i N T B 201 North Franklin Street, Suite 1200 Tampa, FL 33602 `YAGN01.1 `.`.BARBER& :;BRA "q "c E,N` 7400 Trail Boulevard, Suite 200 Naples, FL 34108 `Ardaman 9970 Bavaria Road Fort Myers, FL 33913 8110 Blaikie Court, Suite A Sarasota, FL 34240 ELEMENT 8509 Benjamin Road, Suite E EEEa�Ro P Tampa, FL 33634 Day-to-day , d, management _ct In -person coordination with the survey team early in the process will ensure that all _n is necessary survey information is collected from the outset, allowing the project design handled ' person engineering, traffic "" ll '"' design, to commence on schedule. Project design information will be communicated _ ' _d in HNTBs and environmental the electronically to our specialty subconsultants, allowing them to efficiently collect all '' office. necessary geotechnical, contamination, cultural resource, or utility information that will affect final design. Remote conferencing will also occur with subconsultants to identify any issues and proposed resolutions from the data analysis. As the project progresses, monthly project updates with the County Design PM, Dennis McCoy, PE will occur in person or via virtual meeting if preferred. The agenda for the meetings will also dictate other discipline area attendance from the HNTB team and County departments to present project challenges and offer proposed solutions. The meeting agenda and supporting information for the agenda items will be provided at least one week in advance of the meeting for participant review. Our team's locations also allow for field reviews to identify potential right of way minimization opportunities or to ensure proposed design solutions are constructible. We also propose to meet in -person at key deliverable submittals such as the 60% plan submittals and final design submittal in order to walk through the design plans in an "over the shoulder" format, demonstrating solutions proposed on the project. This approach has proven to be an efficient use of county staff time, while effectively engaging them in the project process. HNTB 75 Collier County Government I Solicitation 21-7901 With nearly 5,000 personnel nationwide, 582 in Florida and 100 locally based in our Tampa office, HNTB offers the ability to be immediately available and responsive to all aspects of the scope of services for this contract. The table below provides the availability of our key personnel. Our diversity of staff ranges from recent graduate entry-level personnel to design professionals, technicians, engineers, planners, and environmental scientists with more than 30 years of experience. This broad range of staff provides us with the opportunity to mentor entry-level staff while maintaining the focus and intent of the tasks through direction provided by senior staff. We are confident that our team has the depth of staff and resources to successfully and efficiently deliver the anticipated activities for this project. Our proposed leadership team of Ed Ponce, PE and Julian Gutierrez, PE are committed to this project with ample availability to meet project requirements. Our organizational chart for this project identifies qualified professionals who have previously worked together on numerous projects, including the Eleven Bridge Replacements project and Vanderbilt Drive design. Each Design and Planning Lead is familiar with County's standards and preferences and are accustomed to working in interdisciplinary teams. Existing design efforts led by John Dewey, PE; Jorge Uy, PE, PTOE, RSP1; Sadie Dalton, PE and Ken Jacobs, TSOS, RSP are anticipated to be complete by late summer of 2021, which allows them to immediately begin work on this assignment. Our team's depth also allows for individuals to assist in initial priority efforts centered around traffic modeling, roadway and structures design, drainage and safety assessments. Projected Workload: Discipline leads will work with Ed to develop a resource -loaded schedule at the outset of the project in order to properly assign personnel based on required skills, availability, schedule requirements, and project budget. This approach ensures staff assigned can be appropriately dedicated to delivering this project on time and on budget. The HNTB team is fully committed to meeting the needs of this contract. Due to our team's breadth and depth of staff, we are confident that there is no situation where our project team would not be able to perform the required services. The figure on the following page illustrates the availability and projected workload for our key team members from HNTB's staff for a two-year period starting the last quarter of 2021. We are confident, through this resource analysis and additional staff available, that the HNTB team will be responsive to you and meet all schedule requirements in an efficient manner providing technically excellent personnel for this project. Key Personnel Ed Ponce, PE Key Personnel Availability Role Project Manager Availability % 60 Julian Gutierrez, PE Deputy Project Manager 50 John Dewey, PE Roadway Design and Maintenance of Traffic Lead 65 Sadie Dalton, PE Structures Lead 65 Ken Jacobs, TSOS, RSP TSM&O and ITS Lead 60 Govardhan Muth ala ari, PE, PTOE Traffic Modeling Lead 50 Michelle Rutishauser Environmental Science Lead 65 Chris Kuzlo, PE Drainage Lead 60 Christine Diaz Public Involvement Lead 50 David Hubbard, PE Senior Roadway Designer 65 Jorge U , PE, PTOE, RSP1 TSM&O/ITS 65 NNTB 76 Collier County Government I Solicitation 21-7901 Staff Availability and Projected Workload Additional Team Resources If project activities need to be accelerated, we have additional resources within our West Florida office and throughout Florida who can immediately step in to assist the team. If needed, our national resources can also supplement local staff and are available to provide unique perspectives and additional subject matter expertise. HNTB's discipline discussion groups also provide an opportunity to get near instantaneous feedback from peer leaders throughout the firm on specialized topics, project experiences and staff availability. Each of our subconsultants have been specifically selected to enhance the strength and depth of our team through their exceptional performance record and history of client responsiveness, demonstrated technical excellence, experience in Collier County, and availability of dedicated staff and resources. MNTB 77 Collier County Collier County Administrative Services Department Procurement Services Division Vendor Check List Solicitation 21-7901 IMPORTANT: Please review carefully and submit with your Proposal/Bid. All applicable documents shall be submitted electronically through BidSync. Vendor should checkoff each of the following items: x❑ General Bid Instructions has been acknowledged and accepted. 0 Collier County Purchase Order Terms and Conditions have been acknowledged and accepted. 0 Form 1: Vendor Declaration Statement 0 Form 2: Conflict of Interest Certification 0 Proof of status from Division of Corporations - Florida Department of State (If work performed in the State) - http://dos.myflorida.com/sunbiz/ should be attached with your submittal. ❑x Vendor MUST be enrolled in the E-Verify - https://www.e-verify.gov/ at the time of submission of the proposal/bid. ❑x Form 3: Immigration Affidavit Certification MUST be signed and attached with your submittal or you MAY be DEEMED NON -RESPONSIVE ❑x E-Verify Memorandum of Understanding or Company Profile page should be attached with your submittal. ❑x Form 4: Certification for Claiming Status as a Local Business, if applicable, has been executed and returned. Collier or Lee County Business Tax Receipt should be attached with your submittal to be considered. ❑x Form 5: Reference Questionnaires form must be utilized for each requested reference and included with your submittal, id applicable to the solicitation. 0 Form 6: Grant Provisions and Assurances package in its entirety, if applicable, are executed and should be included with your submittal. All forms must be executed, or you MAY be DEEMED NON -RESPONSIVE. 0 Vendor W-9 Form. 0 Vendor acknowledges Insurance Requirements and is prepared to produce the required insurance certificate(s) within five (5) days of the County's issuance of a Notice of Recommend Award. 0 The Bid Schedule has been completed and attached with your submittal, applicable to bids. Fx� Copies of all requested licenses and/or certifications to complete the requirements of the project. 0 All addenda have been signed and attached, or you MAY be DEEMED NON -RESPONSIVE. 0 County's IT Technical Architecture Requirements has been acknowledged and accepted, if applicable. 0 Any and all supplemental requirements and terms has been acknowledged and accepted, if applicable. *Not included as not applicable to this solicitation. 5/4/2021 10:13 AM p. 72 ***UPDATED JANUARY 28, 2020*** Collier County Solicitation 21-7901 Administrative Services Department Procurement Services Division Form 1: Vendor Declaration Statement BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Collier County Government Complex Naples, Florida 34112 Dear Commissioners: The undersigned, as Vendor declares that this response is made without connection or arrangement with any other person and this proposal is in every respect fair and made in good faith, without collusion or fraud. The Vendor hereby declares the instructions, purchase order terms and conditions, requirements, and specifications/scope of work of this solicitation have been fully examined and accepted. The Vendor agrees, if this solicitation submittal is accepted by Collier County, to accept a Purchase Order as a form of a formal contract or to execute a Collier County formal contract for purposes of establishing a contractual relationship between the Vendor and Collier County, for the performance of all requirements to which this solicitation pertains. The Vendor states that the submitted is based upon the documents listed by the above referenced solicitation. The Vendor agrees to comply with the requirements in accordance with the terms, conditions and specifications denoted herein and according to the pricing submitted as a part of the Vendor's bids. Further, the Vendor agrees that if awarded a contract for these goods and/or services, the Vendor will not be eligible to compete, submit a proposal, be awarded, or perform as a sub -vendor for any future associated work that is a result of this awarded contract. l IN WITNESS WHEREOF, WE have hereunto subscribed our names on this day of --� i1LO__ , 2021 in the County of Hillsborough county, in the State of Florida Firm's Legal Name: Address: City, State, Zip Code: Florida Certificate of Authority Document Number Federal Tax Identification Number *CCR 4 or CAGE Code *Only if Grant Funded Telephone: Email: Signature by: (Typed and written) Title: HNTB Corporation 201 North Franklin Street, Suite 1200 Tampa, FL 33602 F92000000884 43-1623092 (813)40241SO Leonard C. Becker, Senior Vice President 5/4/2021 10:13 AM p. 73 Collier County Additional Contact Information Solicitation 21-7901 Send payments to: NIA (required if different from Company name used as payee above) Contact name: Title: Address: City, State, ZIP Telephone: Email: Office servicing Collier County to place orders (required if different from above) Contact name: Leonard C. Becker Title: Senior Vice President Address: 201 North Franklin Street, Suite 1200 City, State, ZIP Tampa, FL 33602 Telephone: (813) 402-4150 Email: lebecker HNTB.com 514l2021 10:13 AM p. 74 Collier County Solicitation 21-7901 Covier c014-Pity Administrative Services Department Procurement Services Division Form 2: Conflict of Interest Certification Affidavit The Vendor certifies that, to the best of its knowledge and belief, the past and current work on any Collier County project affiliated with this solicitation does not pose an organizational conflict as described by one of the three categories below: Biased ground rules — The firm has not set the "ground rules" for affiliated past or current Collier County project identified above (e.g., writing a procurement's statement of work, specifications, or performing systems engineering and technical direction for the procurement) which appears to skew the competition in favor of my firm. Impaired objectivity — The firm has not performed work on an affiliated past or current Collier County project identified above to evaluate proposals / past performance of itself or a competitor, which calls into question the contractor's ability to render impartial advice to the government. Unequal access to information — The firm has not had access to nonpublic information as part of its performance of a Collier County project identified above which may have provided the contractor (or an affiliate) with an unfair competitive advantage in current or future solicitations and contracts. In addition to this signed affidavit, the contractor I vendor must provide the following: 1. All documents produced as a result of the work completed in the past or currently being worked on for the above -mentioned project; and, 2. Indicate if the information produced was obtained as a matter of public record (in the "sunshine") or through non-public (not in the "sunshine") conversation (s), meeting(s), document(s) and/or other means. Failure to disclose all material or having an organizational conflict in one or more of the three categories above be identified, may result in the disqualification for future solicitations affiliated with the above referenced project(s). By the signature below, the firm (employees, officers and/or agents) certifies, and hereby discloses, that, to the best of their knowledge and belief, all relevant facts concerning past, present, or currently planned interest or activity (financial, contractual, organizational, or otherwise) which relates to the project identified above has been fully disclosed and does not pose an organizational conflict. HNTB Corporation Company Name G Signature Leonard C. Becker, Senior Vice President Print Name and Title State of Florida County of Hillsborough County The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me by means of lr physical presence or 0 online notarization, this tfh day of TI.kne- (month), 1-0 Zl (year), by �_r,o n ar C . is C C_�-fr (name of person acknowledging). Notary Public State of Florida ' Elizabeth Anne Netter r My Commission GG 181409 (Signature of Notary Public - S to of Florida) �aw� y - Ih Expires 0211512022 iG 1`, L4"e i-in (Print, Type, or Stamp Commissioned Name of Notary Public) �sonallyownOR Produced Identification Type of Identification Produced 5/4/2021 10:13 AM p. 75 State of Florida Department of State I certify from the records of this office that HNTB CORPORATION is a Delaware corporation authorized to transact business in the State of Florida, qualified on December 23, 1992. The document number of this corporation is F92000000884. I further certify that said corporation has paid all fees due this office through December 31, 2021, that its most recent annual report/uniform business report was filed on January 5, 2021, and that its status is active. I further certify that said corporation has not filed a Certificate of Withdrawal. Given under my hand and the Great Seal of the State of Florida at Tallahassee, the Capital, this the Fifth day of January, 2021 K4A Secretary of -State Tracking Number: 1465295319CC To authenticate this certificate,visit the following site,enter this number, and then follow the instructions displayed. https:Hservices.sunbiz.org/Filings/CertificateOfStatus/CertiricateAuthentication From the Florida Board of Professional Engineers (FBPE): "Engineering firms registered with the Florida Department of Business & Professional Regulation (DBPR) will no longer have to renew their registration, and there is no certificate or license to print." Below is a screenshot of HNTB's licensee details from the DBPR website. Licensee Details licensee Information r rl Te: HNTB CORPORATION (Pn-ry Name) Main Address: 115 KIRK DRIVE KANSAS CITY Missouri 64105 County: OUT OF STATE License Mailing: P.O. BOX 412197 KANSAS CITY MO 64141 County OUT OF STATE Li--L—tiiu,, I License Information License Type: Registry Rank, Registry License fluinber: 6500 Status: Current Licensure Date: D2/17/1993 Expires, Special Qualifications Qualification Effective Alternate Names HNTB Collier County Solicitation 21-7901 CoiLie-r c01.14.ty Administrative Services Departrmd Procurement Services Division Form 3: Immigration Affidavit Certification This Affidavit is required and should be signed, by an authorized principal of the firm and submitted with formal solicitation submittals. Further, Vendors are required to be enrolled in the E-Verify program (bt!ps://www.e-verify.gov/ , at the time of the submission of the Vendor's proposal/bid. Acceptable evidence of your enrollment consists of a copy of the properly completed E- Verify Company Profile page or a copy of the fully executed E-Verify Memorandum of Understanding for the company which will be produced at the time of the submission of the Vendor's proposal/bid or within frve (S) day of the County's Notice of Recommend Award. FAILURE TO EXECUTE THIS AFFIDAVIT CERTIFICATION AND SUBMIT WITH VENDOR'S PROPOSAL/BID MAY DEEM THE VENDOR'S AS NON -RESPONSIVE. Collier County will not intentionally award County contracts to any Vendor who knowingly employs unauthorized alien workers, constituting a violation of the employment provision contained in 8 U.S.C. Section 1324 a(e) Section 274A(e) of the Immigration and Nationality Act ("INA"). Collier County may consider the employment by any Vendor of unauthorized aliens a violation of Section 274A (e) of the INA. Such Violation by the recipient of the Employment Provisions contained in Section 274A (e) of the INA shall be grounds for unilateral termination of the contract by Collier County. Vendor attests that they are fully compliant with all applicable immigration laws (specifically to the 1986 Immigration Act and subsequent Amendment(s)) and agrees to comply with the provisions of the Memorandum of Understanding with E-Verify and to provide proof of enrollment in The Employment Eligibility Verification System (E-Verify), operated by the Department of Homeland Security in partnership with the Social Security Administration at the time of submission of the Vendor's proposal/bid. HNTB Corporation Company Name Signature Leonard C. Becker, Senior Vice President Print Name and Title State of Florida County of Hillsborough County The rf�orLeg�oing instrument was acknowledged before me by means of C' physical presence or ❑ online notarization, this day of �j tAn jt_ (month), ? "Ll (year}, by L e o o c A (_4 . e- Cif (name of person acknowledging). Notary Public State of Florida "� Elizabeth Anne Pfeffer (Sa a e of Notary Public - State of Florida) " My commission GG 181409 n ExpirEf 0211512022 (Print, Type, or Stamp Commissioned Name of Notary Public) P sonally Kno OR Produced Identification Type of Identification Produced 5/4/2021 10.13 AM p. 76 E-Verifv- Company ID Number: 150386 Client Company ID Number: 524611 The individuals whose signatures appear below represent that they are authorized to enter into this MOU on behalf of the Employer, the E-Verify Employer Agent and DHS respectively. If you have any questions, contact E-Verify at 1-888-464-4218. Approved by: Employer HNT,BI Cornoration -/ t'i :K&--n N Grn l w% Name (Please Type or Print) Signature � • � �; _ • r 11 S i _ 3/tea laot-.�, Date E-Verify Employer Agent Employment Background Investigations, Inc. Donna Crowley Name (Please Type or Print) Electronically Signed 03/22/2012 Signature Date Department of Homeland Security — Verification Division Name (Please Type or Print) Title Signature Information Required For the E-Verify E-Verify Employer Agent Program Information relating to your Company: Page 14 of 15 1 E-Verify MOU for Employer (Client) using a E-Verify Employer Agent I Revision Date 09/01/09 www.dhs.gov/E-Verify Collier County Solicitation 21-7901 Co ley County Administra a Services []eparl rent Procurement Services Division Form 4: Vendor Submittal — Local Vendor Preference Certification (Check Appropriate Boxes Below) NIA State of Florida (Select County if Vendor is described as a Local Business) ❑ Collier County ❑ Lee County Vendor affirms that it is a local business as defined by the Procurement Ordinance of the Collier County Board of County Commissioners and the Regulations Thereto. As defined in Section Fifteen of the Collier County Procurement Ordinance: Local business means the vendor has a current Business Tax Receipt issued by the Collier County Tax Collector prior to bid or proposal submission to do business within Collier County, and that identifies the business with a permanent physical business address located within the limits of Collier County from which the vendor's staff operates and performs business in an area zoned for the conduct of such business. A Post Office Box or a facility that receives mail, or a non -permanent structure such as a construction trailer, storage shed, or other non -permanent structure shall not be used for the purpose of establishing said physical address. In addition to the foregoing, a vendor shall not be considered a "local business" unless it contributes to the economic development and well-being of Collier County in a verifiable and measurable way. This may include, but not be limited to, the retention and expansion of employment opportunities, support and increase to the County's tax base, and residency of employees and principals of the business within Collier County. Vendors shall affirm in writing their compliance with the foregoing at the time of submitting their bid or proposal to be eligible for consideration as a "local business" under this section. A vendor who misrepresents the Local Preference status of its firm in a proposal or bid submitted to the County will lose the privilege to claim Local Preference status for a period of up to one year under this section. Vendor must complete the following information: NIA Year Business Established in ❑Collier County or ❑ Lee County: Number of Employees (Including Owner(s) or Corporate Officers): Number of Employees Living in ❑ Collier County or ❑ Lee (Including Owner(s) or Corporate Officers): If requested by the County, Vendor will be required to provide documentation substantiating the information given in this certification. Failure to do so will result in vendor's submission being deemed not applicable. Sian and Date Certification: Under penalties ofper ury. I certify that the information shown on this form is correct to my knowledge_ Company Name: HNTB Corporation Address in Col ' Lee County: NIA Signature - Date: 7a #4 Title: Senior Vice President 5l412021 10:13 AM p. 78 Request for Taxpayer Give Form to the Form (Rev. October2018) Identification Number and Certification requester. Do not Department of the Treasury send to the IRS. Internal Revenue Service ► Go to wwmirs.gov/FormW9 for instructions and the latest information. 1 Name (as shown on your income tax return). Name is required on this line; do not leave this line blank. HNTB Corporation 2 Business name/disregarded entity name, if different from above M 3 Check appropriate box for federal tax classification of the person whose name is entered on line 1. Check only one of the 4 Exemptions (codes apply only to tofollowing seven boxes, certain entities, not individuals; see c- c o IGt p ❑ Partnership TrusUestate ❑ Individual/sole proprietor or ❑ C Corporation M S Corporation instructions on page 3): 5 c single -member LLC Exempt payee code (if any) ,� 5 ❑ Limited liability company. Enter the tax classification (C=C corporation, S=S corporation, P=Partnership) 0- 0 Note: Check the appropriate box in the line above for the tax classification of the single -member owner. Do not check Exemption from FATCA reporting rn 'C LLC if the LLC is classified as a single -member LLC that is disregarded from the owner unless the owner of the LLC is code if an ( y) another LLC that is not disregarded from the owner for U.S. federal tax purposes. Otherwise, a single -member LLC that n is disregarded from the owner should check the appropriate box for the tax classification of its owner. d ❑ Other (see instructions) ► (Applies to accounts maintained outside the U.S.) y 5 Address (number, street, and apt. or suite no.) See instructions. Requester's name and address (optional) in One Tampa City Center, 201 North Franklin Street, Ste. 1200 6 City, state, and ZIP code Tampa, FL 33602 7 List account number(s) here (optional) Taxpayer Identification Number (TIN) Enter your TIN in the appropriate box. The TIN provided must match the name given on line 1 to avoid Social security number j backup withholding. For individuals, this is generally your social security number (SSN). However, fora FM - m - resident alien, sole proprietor, or disregarded entity, see the instructions for Part I, later. For other entities, it is your employer identification number (EIN). If you do not have a number, see How to get a TIN, later. or Note: If the account is in more than one name, see the instructions for line 1. Also see What Name and I Employer identification number Number To Give the Requester for guidelines on whose number to enter. M43 - 1 6 2 3 0 912 FOM Certification Under penalties of perjury, I certify that: 1. The number shown on this form is my correct taxpayer identification number (or I am waiting for a number to be issued to me); and 2. 1 am not subject to backup withholding because: (a) I am exempt from backup withholding, or (b) I have not been notified by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) that I am subject to backup withholding as a result of a failure to report all interest or dividends, or (c) the IRS has notified me that I am no longer subject to backup withholding; and 3. 1 am a U.S. citizen or other U.S. person (defined below); and 4. The FATCA code(s) entered on this form (if any) indicating that I am exempt from FATCA reporting is correct. Certification instructions. You must cross out item 2 above if you have been notified by the IRS that you are currently subject to backup withholding because you have failed to report all interest and dividends on your tax return. For real estate transactions, item 2 does not apply. For mortgage interest paid, acquisition or abandonment of secured property, cancellation of debt, contributions to an individual retirement arrangement (IRA), and generally, payments other than interest and dividends, you are not required to sign the certification, but you must provide your correct TIN. See the instructions for Part 11, later. Signature of Her �..V�l �LA�� Here U.S. person► Tax Director Date► 1/12/2021 General Instructions Section references are to the Internal Revenue Code unless otherwise noted. Future developments. For the latest information about developments related to Form W-9 and its instructions, such as legislation enacted after they were published, go to www.irs.gov/F`ormW9. Purpose of Form An individual or entity (Form W-9 requester) who is required to file an information return with the IRS must obtain your correct taxpayer identification number (TIN) which may be your social security number (SSN), individual taxpayer identification number (ITIN), adoption taxpayer identification number (ATIN), or employer identification number (EIN), to report on an information return the amount paid to you, or other amount reportable on an information return. Examples of information returns include, but are not limited to, the following. • Form 1099-INT (interest earned or paid) • Form 1099-DIV (dividends, including those from stocks or mutual funds) • Form 1099-MISC (various types of income, prizes, awards, or gross proceeds) • Form 1099-B (stock or mutual fund sales and certain other transactions by brokers) • Form 1099-S (proceeds from real estate transactions) • Form 1099-K (merchant card and third party network transactions) • Form 1098 (home mortgage interest), 1098-E (student loan interest), 1098-T (tuition) • Form 1099-C (canceled debt) • Form 1099-A (acquisition or abandonment of secured property) Use Form W-9 only if you are a U.S. person (including a resident alien), to provide your correct TIN. If you do not return Form W-9 to the requester with a TIN, you might be subject to backup withholding. See What is backup withholding, later. Cat. No. 10231X Form W-9 (Rev. 10-2018) Collier County INSURANCE AND BONDING REQUIREMENTS Solicitation 21-7901 Insurance / Bond Type Required Limits 1. ® Worker's Compensation Statutory Limits of Florida Statutes, Chapter 440 and all Federal Government Statutory Limits and Requirements Evidence of Workers' Compensation coverage or a Certificate of Exemption issued by the State of Florida is required. Entities that are formed as Sole Proprietorships shall not be required to provide a proof of exemption. An application for exemption can be obtained online at hLtps://Nj2s.fldfs.com/bocexempt/ 2. ® Employer's Liability $_1,000,000_ single limit per occurrence 3. ® Commercial General Bodily Injury and Property Damage Liability (Occurrence Form) patterned after the current $ 1,000,000_single limit per occurrence, $2,000,000 aggregate for Bodily ISO form Injury Liability and Property Damage Liability. This shall include Premises and Operations; Independent Contractors; Products and Completed Operations and Contractual Liability. 4. ® Indemnification To the maximum extent permitted by Florida law, the ContractorNendor shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless Collier County, its officers and employees from any and all liabilities, damages, losses and costs, including, but not limited to, reasonable attorneys' fees and paralegals' fees, to the extent caused by the negligence, recklessness, or intentionally wrongful conduct of the Contractor/ Vendor or anyone employed or utilized by the ContractorNendor in the performance of this Agreement. 5. ® Automobile Liability $_1,000,000_ Each Occurrence; Bodily Injury & Property Damage, Owned/Non-owned/Hired; Automobile Included 6. ® Other insurance as noted: ® Professional Liability $ _2,000,000 Per claim & in the aggregate ❑ Project Professional Liability $ Per Occurrence ® Umbrella $3,000,000 Per Occurrence 7. ❑ Bid bond Shall be submitted with proposal response in the form of certified funds, cashiers' check or an irrevocable letter of credit, a cash bond posted with the County Clerk, or proposal bond in a sum equal to 5% of the cost proposal. All checks shall be made payable to the Collier County Board of County Commissioners on a bank or trust company located in the State of Florida and insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. 8. ❑ Performance and Payment For projects in excess of $200,000, bonds shall be submitted with the executed Bonds contract by Proposers receiving award, and written for 100% of the Contract award amount, the cost borne by the Proposer receiving an award. The Performance and Payment Bonds shall be underwritten by a surety authorized to do business in the State of Florida and otherwise acceptable to Owner; provided, however, the surety shall be rated as "A-" or better as to general policy holders rating and Class V or higher rating as to financial size category and the amount required shall not exceed 5% of the reported policy holders' surplus, all as reported in the most current Best Key Rating Guide, published by A.M. Best Company, Inc. of 75 Fulton Street, New York, New York 10038. 9. ® Vendor shall ensure that all subcontractors comply with the same insurance requirements that he is required to meet. The same Vendor shall provide County with certificates of insurance meeting the required insurance provisions. 10. ® Collier County must be named as "ADDITIONAL INSURED" on the Insurance Certificate for Commercial General Liability where required. This insurance shall be primary and non-contributory with respect to any other insurance maintained by, or available for the benefit of, the Additional Insured and the Vendor's policy shall be endorsed accordingly. 5/4/2021 10:13 AM p. 82 Collier County Solicitation 21-7901 11. ® The Certificate Holder shall be named as Collier County Board of County Commissioners, OR, Board of County Commissioners in Collier County, OR Collier County Government, OR Collier County. The Certificates of Insurance must state the Contract Number, or Project Number, or specific Project description, or must read: For any and all work performed on behalf of Collier County. 12. ® On all certificates, the Certificate Holder must read: Collier County Board of County Commissioners, 3295 Tamiami Trail East, Naples, FL 34112 13. ® Thirty (30) Days Cancellation Notice required. 14. Collier County shall procure and maintain Builders Risk Insurance on all construction projects where it is deemed necessary. Such coverage shall be endorsed to cover the interests of Collier County as well as the Contractor. Premiums shall be billed to the project and the Contractor shall not include Builders Risk premiums in its project proposal or project billings. All questions regarding Builder's Risk Insurance will be addressed by the Collier County Risk Management Division. 4/29/21 - CC Vendor's Insurance Statement We understand the insurance requirements of these specifications and that the evidence of insurability may be required within five (5) days of the award of this solicitation. The insurance submitted must provide coverage for a minimum of six (6) months from the date of award. Name of Firm HNTB Corporation Date June 11, 2021 Vendor Signature &` /, Print Name Insurance Agency Agent Name Leonard Becker, Senior Vice President Mike McIlroy Telephone Number (816) 960-9000 5/4/2021 10:13 AM p. 83 ACORO® CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE 1i1/2022 DATE(MM/DDmYY) 5/25/2021 THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER(S), AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER, AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. IMPORTANT: If the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED, the policy(ies) must have ADDITIONAL INSURED provisions or be endorsed. If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED, subject to the terms and conditions of the policy, certain policies may require an endorsement. A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement(s). PRODUCER Lockton Companies CONTACT NAME: 444 W. 47th Street, Suite 900 Kansas City MO 64112-1906 (816)960-9000 PHONE FAX Ext : A/C No E-MAIL ADDRESS: INSURER(S) AFFORDING COVERAGE NAIC # INSURER A: Zurich American Insurance Company 16535 INSURED HNTB CORPORATION 1489520 201 N. FRANKLIN STREET, SUITE 1200 INSURER B : American Guarantee and Liab. Ins. Co. 26247 INSURER C : INSURER D : TAMPA FL 33602 INSURER E : INSURER F : COVERAGES CERTIFICATE NUMBER: 17592020 REVISION NUMBER: XXXXXXX THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. INSR LTR TYPE OF INSURANCE ADDL INSD SUBR WVD POLICY NUMBER POLICY EFF MM/DD/YYYY POLICY EXP W MM/DD/YY LIMITS A COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY CLAIMS -MADE Fx] OCCUR Y N GLO 0769451-01 1/1/2021 1/1/2022 EACH OCCURRENCE $ 2,000,000 A AGE To RENTED PREM SES Ea occu ence $ 1,000,000 MED EXP (Any one person) $ 10,000 PERSONAL & ADV INJURY $ 2,000,000 GEN'L AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER: POLICY �X JECOT- �X LOC OTHER: GENERAL AGGREGATE $ 4,000,000 PRODUCTS - COMP/OP AGG $ 4,000,000 $ A AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY ANY AUTO OWNED SCHEDULED AUTOS ONLY AUTOS HIRED NON -OWNED AUTOS ONLY AUTOS ONLY Y ICI BAP 0769452-01 1/1/2021 1/1/2022 COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT Ea accident $ 2,000,000 X BODILY INJURY (Per person) $ XXXXXXX BODILY INJURY (Per accident) $ XXXXXXX PROPERTY DAMAGE Per accident $ XXXXXXX $ XXXXXXX B X UMBRELLA LIAB EXCESS LIAB X OCCUR CLAIMS -MADE Y N AUC 1424208-01 1/1/2021 1/1/2022 EACH OCCURRENCE $ 5,000,000 X AGGREGATE $ 5,000,000 DED I I RETENTION $ $ XXXxxXX A WORKERS COMPENSATION AND EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY Y/ N ANY PROPRIETOR/PARTNER/EXECUTIVE OFFICER/MEMBER EXCLUDED? I NJ (Mandatory in NH) yes, describe under DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS below N / A N WC 0769453-01 1/1/2021 1/1/2022 PER OTH- X STATUTE ER E.L. EACH ACCIDENT $ 1,000,000 E.L. DISEASE - EA EMPLOYEE $ 1,000,000 E.L. DISEASE - POLICY LIMIT 1 $ 1,000,000 DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS / LOCATIONS / VEHICLES (ACORD 101, Additional Remarks Schedule, may be attached if more space is required) RE: FOR PROPOSAL PURPOSES. HNTB JOB #77330; IMMOKALEE ROAD AT RANDALL BOULEVARD INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS; SOLICITATION 21-7901. COLLIER COUNTY IS AN ADDITIONAL INSUREDS AS RESPECTS GENERAL LIABILITY, AUTO LIABILITY AND UMBRELLA/EXCESS LIABILITY, THESE COVERAGES ARE PRIMARY AND NON-CONTRIBUTORY IF REQUIRED BY WRITTEN CONTRACT. CERTIFICATE HOLDER CANCELLATION See Attachments 17592020 COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 3295 TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST 3295 TA I MIT NAPAUTHORIZED SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS. REPRESENTATIV . ACORD 25 (2016/03) © 19W8 015ACORD CORPORATION. All rights reserved. The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD ACORO® CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE 5/1/2022 DATE(MM/DDmYY) 5/25/2021 THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER(S), AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER, AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. IMPORTANT: If the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED, the policy(ies) must have ADDITIONAL INSURED provisions or be endorsed. If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED, subject to the terms and conditions of the policy, certain policies may require an endorsement. A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement(s). PRODUCER Lockton Companies CONTACT NAME: 444 W. 47th Street, Suite 900 Kansas City MO 64112-1906 (816)960-9000 PHONE FAX Ext : A/C No E-MAIL ADDRESS: INSURER(S) AFFORDING COVERAGE NAIC # INSURER A: Lexington Insurance Company 19437 INSURED HNTB CORPORATION 1445095 201 N. FRANKLIN STREET, SUITE 1200 INSURER B : INSURER C : INSURER D : TAMPA FL 33602 INSURER E : INSURER F : COVERAGES CERTIFICATE NUMBER: 17592026 REVISION NUMBER: XXXXXXX THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. INSR LTR TYPE OF INSURANCE ADDL INSD SUBR WVD POLICY NUMBER POLICY EFF MM/DD/YYYY POLICY EXP W MM/DD/YY LIMITS COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY CLAIMS -MADE F71 OCCUR NOT APPLICABLE EACH OCCURRENCE $ Y_xxxxXX A AGE To RENTE PREM SES Ea occu ante $ XX=XX MED EXP (Any one person) $ XX=XX PERSONAL & ADV INJURY $ XX=XX GEN'L AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER: GENERAL AGGREGATE $ XX=XX POLICY JECOT- � LOC PRODUCTS - COMP/OP AGG $ Y%_�XX $ OTHER: AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY NOT APPLICABLE Ea act dentSINGLE LIMIT $ XXXYIXXX BODILY INJURY (Per person) $ XXXXXXX ANY AUTO OWNED SCHEDULED AUTOS ONLY AUTOS BODILY INJURY (Per accident) $ XXXXXXX PROPERTY DAMAGE Per accident $ XXXX XXX HIRED NON -OWNED AUTOS ONLY AUTOS ONLY $XXXXXXX UMBRELLA LIAB OCCUR NOT APPLICABLE EACH OCCURRENCE $ XXXXXXX HCLAIMS-MADE AGGREGATE $ XXXXXXX EXCESS LIAB DED RETENTION $ $ XX=XX WORKERS COMPENSATION AND EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY Y ANY PROPRIETOR/PARTNER/EXECUTIVE NOT APPLICABLE PER OTH- STATUTE ER E.L. EACH ACCIDENT $ XX=xx OFFICER/MEMBER EXCLUDED? ❑ (Mandatory in NH) N / A E.L. DISEASE - EA EMPLOYEE $ Yy_YXXXX If yes, describe under DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS below E.L. DISEASE - POLICY LIMIT $ XXXXXXX A PROFESSIONAL N N 061853762 5/1/2021 5/1/2022 $2,000,000 PER CLAIM/ ANNUAL LIABILITY AGGREGATE DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS / LOCATIONS / VEHICLES (ACORD 101, Additional Remarks Schedule, may be attached if more space is required) RE: FOR PROPOSAL PURPOSES. HNTB JOB #77330; IMMOKALEE ROAD AT RANDALL BOULEVARD INTERSECTION IMPROVEMENTS; SOLICITATION 21-7901. CERTIFICATE HOLDER CANCELLATION See Attachment 17592026 COLLIER COUNTY BOAR OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 3295 TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST MAPLES MIT SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS. AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIV . ACORD 25 (2016/03) © 19W8 015ACORD CORPORATION. All rights reserved. The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD FBPE �.�,"..";w4W ,%P, STATE OF FLORIDA BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS THE PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER HEREIN 15 LICENSED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 471 FLORIDAjT TUTES PONCE, EDUARDO ALCIDES 533 QUEENS COURT LAKELAND FL 33803 LICENSE NUMBER: PE5681� EXPIRATION DATE: FEBRUARY 28,2023 Always verify licenses online at MyFloddaLicense.com 0 0' Do not alter this document in any form. This is your license. It is unlawful for anyone other than the licensee to use this s. o document. �FBPEI STATE OF FLORIDA BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS THE PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER HEREIN IS LICENSED UNDERTHE PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 471, FLORIDA STATUTES DEWEY, CHARLES JOHN 2410W PROSPECT RD. TAMPA FL 33629 LICENSE NUMBER: PE68563 EXPIRATION DATE: FEBRUARY 28, 2023 Always verify licenses online at MyFloridAicense.com o. o Do not alter this document in any form. OK This is your license. It is unlawful for anyone other than the licensee to use this document. R..D.—.�.� a FBPI STATE OF FLORIDA • � � BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS THE PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER HEREIN IS LICENSED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 471, FLORIDA STATUTES DALTON, SADIE ADELINE 11876 MIDNIGHTTRAIL TALLAHASSEE FL 32317 C LICENSE NUMBER: PE813445 EXPIRATION DATE: FEBRUARY 28,2023 Always verify licenses online at MYFl n-i-icense.com 0 0' Do not alter this document in any form. 0 This is your license. It is unlawful for anyone other than the licensee to use this document. �eo ne=an<,x�ewmo, FBPE STATE OF FLORIDA BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS THE PRO FE5510 NAL ENGINEER HEREIN IS LICENSED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF, CHAPTER 471, FLORIDA STATUTES GUTIERREZ, JULIAN WAYNE 201 N. FRANKLIN STREET SUITE 1200 nYy� TAMPA FL 33602 L LICENSE NUMBER: PE48879 EXPIRATION DATE: FEBRUARY 28, 2023 Always verify licenses online at MyFloridaLicense.com Do not alter this document in any form. OThis is your license. It is unlawful for anyone other than the licensee to use this document. --:. o o.=a �a�mor F B P E STATE OF FLORIDA 211 BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS THE PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER HEREIN IS LICENSED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 471, FLORIDA STATUTES HUBBARD, DAVID BRONSON iz 201 NORTH FRANKLIN STREET SUITE 1200 TAMPA FL 33602 C LICENSE NUMBER: PE7935� EXPIRATION DATE: FEBRUARY 28, 2023 Always verify licenses online at MyFIOfldaDcens..com o �o Do not alter this document in any form. Oy This is your license. It is unlawful for anyone he, than the licensee to use this document. o.o.=aM, Go—, -4I STATE OF FLORIDA BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS THE PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER HEREIN IS LICENSED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 471, FLORIDA STATUTES WALKER, BENJAMIN GALEN 8002 N HIGHLAND AVE TAMPA FL33604 CLICENSE NUMBER: PE57625 EXPIRATION DATE: FEBRUARY 28, 2023 Always verify licenses online at MyFlorid.U-.se.com o. o Do not alter this document in any form. OR * This is your license. It is unlawful foranyone other than the licensee to use this document. ee,ana..no ea� FBPE ��,�"w: v4��°[ STATE OF FLORIDA BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS THE PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER HEREIN IS LICENSED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 471 FLORIDA STATUTES 9' ® wa v !41 JACKSON, MARIA C. 1113 CHESHIRE COURT SAFETY HARBOR FL 34695 t LICENSE NUMBER: PE71435 EXPIRATION DATE: FEBRUARY 28,2023 Always verify licenses online at MyFloridaLicense.com p .�o Do not alter this document in any form. Of r This Is your license. It is unlawful for anyone other than the licensee to use this document. R.. FBPE STATE OF FLORIDA BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS THE PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER HEREIN IS LICENSED UNDERTHE PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 471, FLORIDA STATUTES 'b UY, JORGE VINCENT C�7 5114 ECHILKOOTAVE. "O TAMPA FL 33617 :a Siw � LICENSE NUMBER: PE77634 EXPIRATION DATE: FEBRUARY 28,2023 Always verify licenses online at My-rid-osose.com o .�o Do not alter this document in any form. O, This is your license. It is unlawful for anyone other than the licensee to use this document. onee=ana,.� a FBPE STATE OF FLORIDA BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS THE PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER HEREIN IS LICENSED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OFF CHAPTER 471, FLORIDA STATUTES RODGERS, BENJAMIN STONER 110 GLEN RIDGE AVENUE TEMPLE TERRACE FL 33617 F— LICENSE NUMBER: PE80350 1 EXPIRATION DATE: FEBRUARY 28,2023 Always verity licenses online at MyFloridaLicense.com o. o Do not alter this document in any form. ❑�' This is your license. It is unlawful for anyone other than the licensee to use this document. ne an,.�o�mo. FBPE W STATE OF FLORIDA BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS THE PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER HEREIN 15 LICENSED UNDER THE PROVISI SQFCCiHAAPTsEERRR 471, FLORIDA STATUTES MUTHYALAGARI, GOVARDHAN REDDY 1216 AVONWOOD CT NN LUTZ FL 33559 _L1� LICENSE NUMBER: PE65474 EXPIRATION DATE: FEBRUARY 28, 2023 Always verify licenses online at MyFloridaLicense.com o. o Do not alter this document in any form. OV { This is your license. It is unlawful for anyoneother than the licensee tousethisdocument. �FBPE STATE OF FLORIDA BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS THE PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER HEREIN IS LICENSED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 471, FLORIDA STATUTES L SOKOLIC, IVAN F. 9970 BAVARIA RD. FORTMYE ._RS - FL 33913. �A � . '; � ' LICENSE NUMBER: PE64314 EXPIRATION DATE FEBRUARY 28, 2023 Ahyays wriry iiceisses online at MyHoddaLicense.com o. o L Da rrot a1Mr this document in arty form. Ob This is your license. Itis unlawhd for anyone.t , than rho licenseem use his document ao ee=a n. �o e,no, F BPE STATE OF FLORIDA BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS THE PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER HEREIN IS LICENSED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 471, FLORIDA STATUTES BOYD, CHARLES EMMETT 507 FRANK SHAW ROAD TALLAHASSEE FL 32312�"�` I LICENSE NUMBER: PE39411 EXPIRATION DATE: FEBRUARY 28, 2023 Always verify licenses online at MyFlo,idaLicense.com o. o Do —Ito, this document in any form. 0' This is your license. It is unlawful for anyone otherthan the licensee to use this document. CO lei' County Email: Administrative Sennces Division Viviana.Giarimoustas@colIiercountyfl.gov Procurement services Telephone: 239-252-8375 Addendum 1 Date: 5121 /2021 From: Viviana Giarimoustas, Procurement Strategist To: Interested Bidders Subject: Addendum #1 Solicitation #21-7901 Immokalee Road at Randall Blvd. Intersection Improvements The following clarifications are issued as an addendum identifying the following clarification to the scope of work, changes, deletions, or additions to the original solicitation document for the referenced solicitation: Change 1. See following pages for requested PD&E concept plans. If you require additional information please post a question on our Bid Sync (www.bidsyne.com) bidding platform under the solicitation for this project. Please sign below and return a copy of this Addendum with your submittal for the above (Signature) BNTB Corporation, Leonard C. Becker, Senior Vice President (Name of Firm) -3�4.c- 84Z07-1 Date CA7 couinty Email: Adminie4abv+e Serv;ces [vision Viviana.Giarimoustas@colliercountyfl.gov Procurement Services Telephone: 239-252-8375 Addendum 2 Date: 5/25/2021 From: Viviana Giarimoustas, Procurement Strategist To: Interested Bidders Subject: Addendum #2 Solicitation #21-7901 Immokalee Road at Randall Blvd. Intersection Improvements The following clarifications are issued as an addendum identifying the following clarification to the scope of work, changes, deletions, or additions to the original solicitation document for the referenced solicitation: Change 1. This solicitation has been extended from June 3, 2021 to June 14, 2021 Change 2. The introduction states: The Consultant shad may use the approved concepts as a basis for the design unless otherwise directed by the County. All PD&E study final reports can be obtained at the FDOT website (http://swflroads.com/irnmokalee/randall/vden. Strikethrough is being removed. Change 3. As built plans have been included, see pages below. If you require additional information please post a question on our Bid Sync (www.bidsync.com) bidding platform under the solicitation for this project. Please sign below and return a copy of this Addendum with your submittal for the above Date HNTB Corporation, Leonard C. Becker, Senior Vice President (Name of Firm) MNTB HNTB Corporation 201 North Franklin Street Suite 1200 Tampa, FL 33602 (813) 402-4150 !k S