The URL can be used to link to this page

CCLAAC Agenda 08/09/2021AGENDA CONSERVATION COLLIER LAND ACQUISITION ADVISORY COMMITTEE August 9, 2021, 9:00 A.M. Commission Boardroom W. Harmon Turner Building (Building "F"), Third Floor As part of an ongoing initiative to promote social distancing during the Covid-19 pandemic, the public will have the opportunity to provide public comments remotely, as well as in person. Individuals who would like to participate remotely, should register here. Individuals who register will receive an email in advance of the public hearing detailing how they can participate remotely in this meeting. For additional information about the meeting, please call Summer Araque at (239) 252-2979 or email to: ConservationCollierkcolliercountyfl.gov I. Roll Call II. Approval of Agenda III. Approval of July 12, 2021, Meeting Minutes IV. New Business A. Acquisition Cycle 10 — Initial Screening Criteria 1. Dr. Robert H. Gore III Preserve area parcels Argay Estate (7.05 acres), Kenneth Cedeno (2.81), Eugene D'angelo (5), Charles Edwin Bailey (1.14), Carol Rudnick - DONATION (1.59) 2. Josef Magdalener property near Shell Island preserve 3. Emily Arnold property near Pepper Ranch preserve 4. Eugene Erjavec property near Rivers Road preserve 5. Panther Walk area parcels Timothy R and Jenett Johnson (1.14 acres), Veronica Naughton (2.73), Barry L Grossman Trust (2.73), Isabel Gonzalez (1.14), Charles W Hackmann (2.73), Virginia M Meyer Trust (1.59), Linda and Charles E Anderson Jr (1.14, 2.27), Kroneman Express (2.27), David Joyce (2.27), D&J Investors LLC (1.14), David V Wright (1.14), Sandra Burns (1.14), Kathleen Macrina (1.14), Paul Edward Moylan (2.73), Maribeth L Selvig (1.14), Lois J Behnke (1.14), William F Thommen III (5), and the PS & NE Sanchez Rev Trust (2.73) B. Acquisition Cycle 10 — updates on applications received V. Old Business A. Preserve Updates VI. Coordinator Communications A. BCC Items — none since last meeting B. Meetings for 2022 — scheduled for first Wednesday of the month at 1 pm C. Miscellaneous Items VII. Subcommittee Reports A. Lands Evaluation & Management — Chair, Bill Poteet — next meeting September 8, 2021 B. Outreach — Chair, Brittany Patterson -Weber — last meeting March 24, 2021 C. Ordinance Policy and Rules —Chair selected Tom landimarino at last meeting July 28, 2021 Vill. Chair and Committee Member Comments IX. Public General Comments X. Staff Comments XI. Next Meeting — September 13, 2021 XII. Adjourn ****************************************************************************************************** Committee Members: Please notify Summer Araque at 252-2979 no later than 5:00 p.m. Thursday, August 5, 2021, if you cannot attend this meeting or if you have a conflict and will abstain from voting on an agenda item. July 12, 2021 MINUTES OF THE CONSERVATION COLLIER LAND ACQUISITION ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING Naples, Florida, July 12, 2021 LET IT BE REMEMBERED, the Conservation Collier Land Acquisition Advisory Committee in and for the County of Collier, having conducted business herein, met on this date at 9:00 A.M. in REGULAR SESSION at Administrative Building "F", 3' Floor, Collier County Government Complex Naples, Florida with the following members present: CHAIRMAN: VICE CHAIRMAN: Bill Poteet Michele Lenhard Michael Seef (via Zoom) Gary Bromley Brittany Patterson -Weber Thomas J. Iandimarino Hannah Rinaldi David Corban (Excused) Carl Kuehner (via Zoom) ALSO PRESENT: Summer Araque, Conservation Collier Program Coordinator Jennifer Belpedio, Assistant County Attorney 1 July 12, 2021 Any persons in need of the verbatim record of the meeting may request a copy of the video recording from the Collier County Communications and Customer Relations Department or view online. I. Roll Call Chairman Poteet called the meeting to order at 9:00 A.M. Roll call was taken and a quorum was established by those present in person. Mr. Iandimarino moved to allow Mr. Kuehner and Mr. Seef to participate via Zoom due to an extraordinary circumstance. Second by Ms. Lenhard. Carried unanimously 6 — 0. II. Approval of Agenda Mr. Lenhard moved to approve the Agenda. Second by Mr. Iandimarino. Carried unanimously 8 — 0. III. Approval of May 10, 2021 minutes Ms. Patterson -Weber moved to approve the minutes of the May 10, 2021 meeting as presented. Second by Mr. Iandimarino. Carried unanimously 8 — 0. IV. New Business A. Acquisition Cycle 10 1. Big Hammock Initial Criteria Screening Report (ICSR) Ms. Araque presented the "Big Hammock Initial Criteria Screening Report Updated from 2009 & 2018 Reports - Staff Report Date: July 2021 " for informational purposes. Property Owner: Barron Collier Partnership, LLLC Property Location: South of Pepper Ranch Parcel size: Area I — 235 acres; Area II — 799.4 acres; Total = 1,034.4 acres She noted that the lands were evaluated in Cycle 9 and ranked at 8 and 9 for potential acquisition. The Report presented today is the same as the one reviewed during Cycle 9. The following was noted during Committee discussions: • That the properties are in Stewardship Sending Area #13 (SSA 13) of the Rural Lands Stewardship Area, a voluntary landowner program in the County designed to protect environmentally sensitive lands (Sending Areas) while allowing development in other suitable areas (Receiving Areas). • The Sending Areas allow development credits to be obtained by dedicating the lands to conservation and transferring the credits to areas allowed for development. Four credits are eligible when a Restoration Plan is filed for the lands (R1) and an additional 4 are garnered when the Restoration has been completed (R2). • A Restoration Plan was filed for lands in Area II which enabled development credits of 4 units per acre (R1) for the 261 eligible acres. The restoration required has not yet been completed and the 4 credits per acre are held in escrow for potential use by the landowner in the future. • If the County acquires the properties, the developer intends to retain the credits obtained for development. • The current appraisal identified in the ICSR is from 2019 and if the County moves forward with the purchase, a new appraisal would be sought. Austin Howell, Barron Collier Partnership, LLLC reported: • That all acreage eligible for restoration in Area II is included in the plan filed by the owner. 2 July 12, 2021 • They would be willing to waive any oil and gas "surface rights" which allow a party to install equipment or fixtures on the property for oil and gas exploration/extraction. • When Pepper Ranch was purchased by the County, the landowner retained the credits due to him under the program. • If the County acquires the properties, they will be retaining an easement through the property for restoration purposes and access to other lands they own adjacent to these parcels. • The intent is to also retain the rights to any Panther Habitat Unit Credits available on the lands. • All lands in SSA #13 are owned by Barron Collier Partnership, LLLC. Speaker Meredith Budd, Florida Wildlife Federation supports acquisition of the lands but expressed concern over the County acquiring the property at market value and allowing the owner to retain the land use credits. The acquisition of the Pepper Ranch property brought this issue to light, and she recommended that if the owner retains the R1 credits, a maintenance endowment be provided to the County. If the R2 credits are realized, the owner provides maintenance of the area as required under the plan into perpetuity. The other option which should be considered if the credits are retained by the owner, the market value of the lands be adjusted to reflect retention of the credits. It would be unfair to the taxpayers if the properties are purchased at current market value without some form of value adjustment or endowments. Mr. Iandimarino moved the application forward for full analysis. Second by Ms. Patterson - Weber. Carried unanimously 8 — 0. Discussion occurred on whether the current report is the final analysis for the property and if the approval should have been subject to the outstanding items being addressed by the applicant (i.e., the status of the credits should the County acquire the property). Ms. Araque reported that the current ICSR is the final analysis for the properties however, they will be reporting back to the Committee on the outstanding items discussed today. Mr. Seef expressed concern on moving the application forward to the ranking process given the outstanding items and the ICSR may need to be amended based on the owner's responses. Ms. Belpedio noted that she is requesting the owner provide responses to questions raised today. Mr. Howell noted that he could report back to the Committee in August on outstanding items. Ms. Lenhard moved to accept the ICSR report. Second by Ms. Rinaldi. Mr. Seef recommended that the motion be subject to the outstanding items raised in today's meeting being addressed. Chairman Poteet noted that the items will be discussed at the August meeting. Motion carried 7 "yes" — I "no. " Mr. Seef voted "no. " Cycle 10 Update 3 July 12, 2021 Ms. Araque provide the update noting 18 applications have been filed as follows: In the area of Panther Walk Preserve — 7; In the area of the Robert H. Gore, III Preserve — 2; In the area of Rivers Road Preserve — 4 and in the area of Shell Island Preserve -1. In addition to those, 3 were heard at May's meeting (preliminary reports for Rivers Road 19.4 acres parcel, Bethune Road/ Sanitation Road properties and the HHH Ranch Section 33) and 1 today for Baron Collier Partnership, LLLC Big Hammock lands. 2. Multi -Parcel projects Appraisal Ms. Araque provided updated maps for the Red Maple Swamp and Winchester Head multi - parcel projects and the report "Real Estate Appraisal Report — June 12, 2021, Red Maple Swamp and Winchester Head" for informational purposes. She queried if the Committee desires staff to send out a letter to landowners in the project areas to determine their interest in selling their property to the County. Speaker Brad Cornell, Audubon of the Western Everglades expressed support for the multi -parcel projects and recommended acquisitions continue as the lots are not suited for development due to their wet conditions. Ms. Araque noted that the lots located within the boundaries of the projects may be considered for acquisition at any time and are not part of the Cycle/Ranking process. Mr. Seef moved to direct staff to contact the property owners via US mail to determine if 'they are interested in selling their lands to the County. Second by Ms. Lenhard. Carried unanimously 8 — 0. V. Old Business A. Railhead Scrub Preserve updates 1. School site coordination Ms. Araque reported that a site plan has been developed which depicts 6 parking spaces allocated to Railhead Scrub Preserve, in the area of the proposed Sheriff's housing on the property where the new high school will be constructed. The spaces are adjacent to the Preserve which will allow visitors to park and enter the site on foot. 2. Veterans Memorial Boulevard Ms. Araque provided a copy of the Transportation Department's PowerPoint "Collier County Project #60198 Veterans Memorial Boulevard Extension FDOT PD&E Coordination Meeting June 10, 2021" for informational purposes. She noted Phase I is under construction at 32 percent completion. Construction for Phase II, connecting the school entrance road to US41 is anticipated to initiate in 2023 with completion estimated for the summer of 2025. Phase II includes an asphalt roadway, bike path, sidewalks and a stormwater retention pond. Speaker Meredith Budd, Florida Wildlife Federation addressed the Committee noting that she met with representatives of the Transportation Department to address the Gopher Tortoises in the area, and discussions are underway for construction of a wildlife underpass for the roadway to provide connectivity to the two areas utilized by the species. Fencing is also under consideration to deter the species from crossing the roadway. irl July 12, 2021 VI. Coordinator Communications A. BCC Items Ms. Araque noted that the Board of County Commissioners approved: • Gore Memorandum of Understanding Amendments. • Filing grant applications for State funding to assist in exotics removal on preserves in 2022. • The new Camp Host Agreement for Pepper Ranch effective in the Fall of 2021. B. Preserve Updates Ms. Araque provided the following updates: Rattlesnake Hammock Preserve — A workday was held on June 19th where County staff, FGCU students and other volunteers assisted with projects on the property. Construction of the fencing is on hold due to the increase in construction costs. Pepper Ranch — A survey of the deer population was conducted, and it is estimated the current population is 84. Staff is monitoring the sunflower plants to determine the feasibility of holding the Sunflower Festival in the Fall. C. Move meetings for 2022 Mr. Araque reported that staff is requesting the Committee's regular meeting day be changed as Monday's make it difficult for them to prepare for a meeting as it needs to be done 1 — 2 days in advance given the items which may arise just prior to the meeting. This timeframe currently encompasses a weekend due to a Monday meeting. At this point, the following days have been tentatively identified for the meeting: Is' Wednesday of the month — Ipm. 2nd Wednesday of the month — Ipm. 2nd Thursday of the month — 9am. 3' Tuesday of the month. Committee Members noted the 2nd Wednesday and 2nd Thursday are not feasible based on scheduling conflicts and Ms. Araque noted she would review the input and notify the Committee of the new date. D. Miscellaneous Items None VII. Subcommittee Reports A. Lands Evaluation & Management — Chair, Bill Poteet The next meeting is anticipated to be convened on September 8, 2021. B. Outreach — Chair, Brittany Patterson -Weber The last meeting was held on March 24, 2021. C. Policy and Rules — Chair to be selected at next meeting; meeting July 28, 2021. VIII. Chair Committee Member Comments None IX. Public General Comments None 5 July 12, 2021 X. Staff Comments None XI. Next Meeting Date August 9, 2021 There being no further business for the good of the County, the meeting was adjourned by order of the chair at 10:40 A.M. Conservation Collier Land Acquisition Advisory Committee Bill Poteet, Chairman These minutes approved by the Board/Committee on as presented or as amended 2 Conservation Collier Land Acquisition Program Initial Screening Criteria Property Owner(s), acreage, and folio: 4 properties owners total = 10.54 acres Kenneth Cedeno — 2.81 acres (41504760009) Eugene D'angelo — 5 acres (41661840008) Charels Bailey — 1.14 acres (41618160003) Carol Rudnick — 1.59 acres (41502560007) Property Location: Dr. Robert H. Gore III preserve area — existing preserve 171.2 acres Nominations to the Conservation Collier Program are based on satisfying at least two of the initial screening criteria below. Qualified sites shall then be further prioritized by secondary evaluative criteria. 1. Are any of the following unique and endangered plant communities found on the property? Order of preference as follows: Ord. 2002-63, sec. 10 (1)(a) Yes No a. Hardwood hammocks ❑ b. Xeric oak scrub ❑ c. Coastal strand ❑ d. Native beach ❑ e. Xeric pine ❑ f. High marsh (saline) ❑ g. Tidal freshwater marsh ❑ h. Other native habitats ® ❑ Wetland hardwoods; 6216-Cypress-Mixed Hardwoods; 6172-Mixed shrubs; 6210- Cypress 2. Does land offer significant human social values, such as equitable geographic distribution, appropriate access for nature -based recreation, and enhancement of the aesthetic setting of Collier County? Ord. 2002-63, sec.10 (1)(n) ®Yes ❑No These four parcels would be an expansion of the existing Conservation Collier Dr. Robert H. Gore III preserve. The parcels have access from public roads: Desoto Blvd., 36th Ave. SE, 38th Ave. SE , and 40th Ave. Desoto is paved road, as well as 38th Ave. SE and 40th Ave. SE. These parcels are immediately adjacent to or across the street from the existing preserve. All properties could accommodate seasonal outdoor recreation and expansion of existing and planned trails. 3. Does the property offer opportunities for protection of water resource values, including aquifer recharge, water quality enhancement, protection of wetland dependant species habitat, and flood control? Ord. 2002-63, sec.10 (1)(c) ®Yes ❑No The plant communities found on the properties were mostly consistent with mapped soils, and the properties contain wetlands and wetland plant communities. As such, they provide habitat for wetland -dependent species. The properties are not mapped as contributing significantly to the Tamiami Aquifer, but they are mapped as contributing moderately to the Surficial Aquifer. Wetlands can serve as a buffer to filter contaminated water. Since surface water in this area flows towards the I-75 canal, and wetlands on the parcels may help to clean runoff before it enters the I- 75 canal. The Rudnick and Cedeno parcels hold water during wet season and can be expected to contribute to flood control in the local area. The presence of hydrologic indicators such as cypress knees, karst and water marks on buttressed cypress trunks provides evidence of seasonal flooding. 4. Does the property offer significant biological values, including biodiversity, listed species habitat, connectivity, restoration potential and ecological quality? Ord. 2002-63, See.10 (1)(d) ®Yes ❑No These parcels are mapped as having above -average biodiversity. Wildlife monitoring cameras within the preserve area indicate high utilization by Florida panther, Florida black bear, white tailed deer, wild turkey, spotted skunk, and nesting birds. The parcels in application (with the exception of D'angelo parcel) would need to have the Brazilian pepper (Schinus terebinthifolius) removed from the properties as was done with the existing preserve parcels. The D'Angelo parcel understory and Brazilian pepper infestation was mechanically removed in 2018, the property is maintained through regular mowing. The 171.2-acre preserve has been entirely treated for exotic vegetation and is now under maintenance. Adding onto the preserve will provide additional acreage that will not be developed and in turn will be available for wildlife utilization. 5. Does the property enhance and/or protect the environmental value of current conservation lands through function as a buffer, ecological link or habitat corridor? Ord. 2002-63, Sec.10 (1)(e) ®Yes ❑No These properties are within a historic wetland area that connects on the east side with the Florida Panther National Wildlife Refuge (FPNWR) via the vehicle test track, about a mile and a half away. The Gore properties would enhance or protect the FPNWR primarily by acting as a buffer and providing a reasonably large sized wild land addition north of I-75. There are Wildlife underpasses at the FakaUnion and Miller Canal. Just south of FPNWR and the I-75 corridor, is the Fakahatchee Strand State Preserve, about 2.5 miles from the properties. Panthers who utilize the existing 2 underpasses under I-75 (the Faka Union and Miller canals) could access the preserve. A little over 2 miles to the west are the North Belle Meade sending lands. In 2007, Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC) biologists did not encourage use of the area to corridor panthers farther west into North Belle Meade due to increasing development in that area. At present, FWC would support the acquisition of this property for panther habitat, but cautions about defining a westward corridor because there is no master plan that identifies it as such and there are developed lands west of Everglades Blvd. Potential for a future Everglades access to I-75 is also a noted obstacle in the way of a habitat corridor. The Picayune Strand State Forest is directly to the south across I-75. Panthers could move south from the Fakaunion canal, just south of the properties, into the Picayune creating an ecological link and habitat corridor. The Gore properties are located within a Primary Panther Habitat Zone. Is the property within the boundary of another agency's acquisition project? ❑Yes ®No If yes, will use of Conservation Collier funds leverage a significantly higher rank or funding priority for the parcel? ❑Yes ®No Without such funding circumstances, Conservation Collier funds shall not be available forpurchase of these lands. Ord. 2002-63, Sec.10 (1)(1) MEETS INITIAL SCREENING CRITERIA ®Yes ❑No Dr. Robert H. Gore III Preserve -Adjacent parcels Legend Gore ISC Parcels Dr. Robert H. Gore III Preserve CONgWATION C LLIER Ca er Cofnty 0 0.55 1.1 Miles Dr. Robert H. Gore III Preserve - Surrounding Lands Legend Gore ISC Parcels Dr. Robert H. Gore III Preserve M i'kes Conservation Collier Land Acquisition Program Initial Screening Criteria Property Owner: Josef Magdalener Parcel(s) acreage: 18.73 Property Location: Adjacent to Shell Island Preserve, SE of Collier Blvd and Port Au Prince Drive Nominations to the Conservation Collier Program are based on satisfying at least two of the initial screening criteria below. Qualified sites shall then be further prioritized by secondary evaluative criteria. 1. Are any of the following unique and endangered plant communities found on the property? Order of preference as follows: Ord. 2002-63, Sec. 10 (1)(a) Yes No a. Hardwood hammocks ❑ b. Xeric oak scrub ❑ c. Coastal strand ❑ d. Native beach ❑ e. Xeric pine ❑ f. High marsh (saline) ® ❑ g. Tidal freshwater marsh ® ❑ h. Other native habitats _pine flatwood, cabbage palm forest ® ❑ 2. Does land offer significant human social values, such as equitable geographic distribution, appropriate access for nature -based recreation, and enhancement of the aesthetic setting of Collier County? Ord. 2002-63, See.10 (1)(b) ®Yes [—]No This property is within the Urban Coastal Fringe and visible from a major County Road. It is adjacent to other Conservation Collier land and is accessible via Port Au Prince Rd. 3. Does the property offer opportunities for protection of water resource values, including aquifer recharge, water quality enhancement, protection of wetland dependant species habitat, and flood control? Ord. 2002-63, Sec.10 (1)(c) ®Yes [:]No The parcel has a mapped surficial recharge capacity of 43 to 56" annually, considered moderate. The parcel has a mapped Lower Tamiami recharge capacity of -48" to -32" indicating it a discharge area. Surface water is present throughout the property during the wet season, wetland dependent vegetation exists on site and the property provides foraging habitat for wading birds. 4. Does the property offer significant biological values, including biodiversity, listed species habitat, connectivity, restoration potential and ecological quality? Ord. 2002-63, See.10 (1)(d) ®Yes ❑No This parcel enhances connectivity with adjacent Conservation Collier Preserve and Rookery Bay National Estuarine Research Reserve. Existing plant communities indicate utilization by imperiled bird species. Florida panther telemetry location data indicates utilization of habitat within 1000ft of the parcel boundary. 5. Does the property enhance and/or protect the environmental value of current conservation lands through function as a buffer, ecological link or habitat corridor? Ord. 2002-63, See.10 (1)(e) ®Yes ❑No The parcel provides connectivity with Conservation Collier Shell Island Preserve and the Rookery Bay National Estuarine Research Reserve. Is the property within the boundary of another agency's acquisition project? ®Yes ❑No If yes, will use of Conservation Collier funds leverage a significantly higher rank or funding priority for the parcel? ❑Yes ❑No Without such funding circumstances, Conservation Collier funds shall not be available for purchase of these lands. Ord. 2002-63, Sec.10 (1)(f) MEETS INITIAL SCREENING CRITERIA ®Yes ❑No Initial Screening Criteria- Magdalener Conservation Collier Preserves Magdalener Boundary Adjacent Conservation Land CON ATION LLIER Coll}ew County ✓' �" 0.5 Miles Conservation Collier Land Acquisition Program Initial Screening Criteria Property Owner Emily Arnold Parcel(s) acreage: 5 acres Property Location: Adjacent to the south of the Pepper Ranch Preserve south of Trafford Oaks Road Immokalee, FL Nominations to the Conservation Collier Program are based on satisfying at least two of the initial screening criteria below. Qualified sites shall then be further prioritized by secondary evaluative criteria. 1. Are any of the following unique and endangered plant communities found on the property? Order of preference as follows: Ord. 2002-63, sec. 10 (1)(a) Yes No a. Hardwood hammocks ❑ b. Xeric oak scrub ❑ c. Coastal strand ❑ d. Native beach ❑ e. Xeric pine ❑ f. High marsh (saline) ❑ g. Tidal freshwater marsh ❑ h. Other native habitats ® ❑ 2. Does land offer significant human social values, such as equitable geographic distribution, appropriate access for nature -based recreation, and enhancement of the aesthetic setting of Collier County? Ord. 2002-63, sec. 10 (1)(b) ❑Yes ®No This parcel is adiacent to the 2.512 acre Penner Ranch Preserve and can be directiv accessed from Trafford Oaks Road. However, Trafford Oaks Road is a private road with a security gate that would prohibit public access. There is also and aericultural fence alone the north side of Trafford Oaks road alone the southern boundary of Penner Ranch Preserve which is necessary to keep cattle in. 3. Does the property offer opportunities for protection of water resource values, including aquifer recharge, water quality enhancement, protection of wetland dependant species habitat, and flood control? Ord. 2002-63, sec. 10 (1)(c) ®Yes ❑No Acquisition of this property would offer increased opportunities for protection of water resource values, includingrecharge echarge of the surficial aquifer and protection of wetland dependent species habitat. The aerial map indicates that at least 50% of the property contains wetlands. A moderate surficial recharge rate would also indicate habitat for wetland dependent species is present most of the year. A primary benefit to preserving the offered lands in an undeveloped state would be protection of the Corkscrew swamp and marsh complex and wetlands associated with Lake Trafford. The Corkscrew swamp and marsh complex provide recharge for the Lower Tamiami aquifer, a source of drinking water for many Coun . and private wells east of Count 951. Acquisition of this parcel would add to the protection of the quality of this water source by increasing the buffering of the Corkscrew slough from development and non -point source pollution. 4. Does the property offer significant biological values, including biodiversity, listed species habitat, connectivity, restoration potential and ecological quality? Ord. 2002-63, sec. 10 (i)(d) ®Yes ❑No This parcel would provide significant biological values, listed species habitat, restoration potential and moderate to high ecological quality. We can assume that the same important wildlife species documented on the adjacent Pepper Ranch also utilize this property including the Florida Panther, Black Bear and multiple bird species. There is significant restoration potential for forested areas impacted by invasive exotic plants. This parcel is adjacent to significant County, State, and private conservation lands. 5. Does the property enhance and/or protect the environmental value of current conservation lands through function as a buffer, ecological link or habitat corridor? Ord. 2002-63, Sec. 10 (1)(e) ®Yes ❑No Preservation and restoration of this parcel would protect the value of the Corkscrew Marsh functioning as buffer to the 60,000 South Florida Water Management District conserved lands that include the CREW Marsh wetlands and as ecological link and corridor for the Camp Keais Strand and other conservation lands to the south. The parcel is adjacent to and contributes to an important wildlife corridor through the adjacent Pepper Ranch Preserve and other state owned conservation land. Is the property within the boundary of another agency's acquisition project? ❑Yes ®No If yes, will use of Conservation Collier funds leverage a significantly higher rank or funding priority for the parcel? ❑Yes ®No Without such funding circumstances, Conservation Collier funds shall not be available for purchase of these lands. Ord. 2002-63, Sec. 10 (1)(f) MEETS INITIAL SCREENING CRITERIA ®Yes ❑No Initial Screening Criteria n 0 os 1 .A "a "'a 9 &jry Mlles Emn Arcola Prveel PeaPsr Rolm Preserve MU Initial Screening Criteria Conservation Collier Land Acquisition Program Initial Screening Criteria Property Owner: Eugene Erjavec Parcel(s) acreage: 4.92 acres Property Location: 1760 Krape Road near Rivers Road Preserve; folio 00214880003 Nominations to the Conservation Collier Program are based on satisfying at least two of the initial screening criteria below. Qualified sites shall then be further prioritized by secondary evaluative criteria. 1. Are any of the following unique and endangered plant communities found on the property? Order of preference as follows: Ord. 2002-63, Sec. 10 (1)(a) Yes No a. Hardwood hammocks ❑ b. Xeric oak scrub ❑ c. Coastal strand ❑ d. Native beach ❑ e. Xeric pine ❑ f. High marsh (saline) ❑ g. Tidal freshwater marsh ❑ h. Other native habitats:-Cypress/Pine/cabbage Palm_ ® ❑ 2. Does land offer significant human social values, such as equitable geographic distribution, appropriate access for nature -based recreation, and enhancement of the aesthetic setting of Collier County? Ord. 2002-63, See.10 (1)(b) ®Yes [—]No This property may be accessed via Krape Road and offers land -based opportunities for natural resource - based recreation consistent with the goals of this program, including but not limited to, environmental education, hiking, and nature photography. It is adjacent to the Popp parcel and is located approximately 670ft west and 720ft south of the Rivers Road Preserve. 3. Does the property offer opportunities for protection of water resource values, including aquifer recharge, water quality enhancement, protection of wetland dependant species habitat, and flood control? Ord. 2002-63, Sec.10 (1)(c) ®Yes ❑No The property contains wetlands and therefore provides habitat for wetland dependent species. The property contributes significantly to both the Lower Tamiami Aquifer and Surficial Aquifer. The ability of these parcels to contribute to flood control is unknown, though from the presence of hydrologic indicators such as cypress knees and buttressed trunks, the property appears to contain surface water for at least part of the year. 4. Does the property offer significant biological values, including biodiversity, listed species habitat, connectivity, restoration potential and ecological quality? Ord. 2002-63, Sec.10 (1)(d) ®Yes ❑No Listed plant and animal species have been documented on the 76-acre Rivers Road Preserve to the northeast of this parcel. The native plant communities on this parcel provide additional habitat for a suite of upland and wetland dependent species, and wildlife including the Florida panther black bear. 5. Does the property enhance and/or protect the environmental value of current conservation lands through function as a buffer, ecological link or habitat corridor? Ord. 2002-63, See.10 (1)(e) ®Yes ❑No The parcel contributes to an important wildlife corridor connecting two private conservation easements through a wildlife crossing under Immokalee Road to the over 60,000-acre Corkscrew Regional Ecosystem Watershed (CREW) owned by the South Florida Water Management District and Audubon Florida. Is the property within the boundary of another agency's acquisition project? ❑Yes ®No If yes, will use of Conservation Collier funds leverage a significantly higher rank or funding priority for the parcel? ❑Yes ❑No Without such funding circumstances, Conservation Collier funds shall not be available forpurchase of these lands. Ord. 2002-63, Sec.10 (1)(f) MEETS INITIAL SCREENING CRITERIA ®Yes ❑No Initial Criteria Screening - Erjavec Parcel Erjavec_Parcel Rivers Road Preserve Conservation Easements CON ATION LLIER Coi�iPer County 0 0.6 1.2 Miles Conservation Collier Land Acquisition Program Initial Screening Criteria Property Owners and Parcel Acreage: 19 parcels total Timothy R and Jenett Johnson (1.14), Veronica Haughton (2.73), Barry L Grossman Trust (2.73), Isabel Gonzalez (L 14), Charles W Hackmann (2.73), Virginia M Meyer Trust (1.59), Linda and Charles E Anderson Jr (1.14, 2.27), Kroneman Express (2.27), David Joyce (2.27), D&J Investors LLC (1.14), David V Wright (1.14), Sandra Burns (1.14), Kathleen Macrina (1.14), Paul Edward Moylan (2.73), Maribeth L Selvig (1.14), Lois J Behnke (1.14), William F Thommen III (5), and the PS & NE Sanchez Rev Trust (2.73) Parcel(s) acreage: 37.31 acres total Property Location: Panther Walk preserve area; West of Everglades Blvd between 58t" Ave NE and 72nd Ave NE Nominations to the Conservation Collier Program are based on satisfying at least two of the initial screening criteria below. Qualified sites shall then be further prioritized by secondary evaluative criteria. 1. Are any of the following unique and endangered plant communities found on the property? Order of preference as follows: Ord. 2002-63, sec. 10 (1)(a) Yes No a. Hardwood hammocks ❑ b. Xeric oak scrub ❑ c. Coastal strand ❑ d. Native beach ❑ e. Xeric pine ❑ f. High marsh (saline) ❑ g. Tidal freshwater marsh ❑ h. Other native habitats: Cypress, Marshes, Hydric Pine Flatwoods, Mesic Flatwoods, Cypress/Tupelo ® ❑ 2. Does land offer significant human social values, such as equitable geographic distribution, appropriate access for nature -based recreation, and enhancement of the aesthetic setting of Collier County? Ord. 2002-63, Sec. 10 (1)(b) ®Yes [-]No These properties may be accessed from several roads between 58`' Ave NE and 70' Ave NE off Everglades Boulevard North. The parcels offer land -based opportunities for natural resource -based recreation consistent with the goals of this program, including but not limited to, environmental education, hiking, and naturel photography. Several of these parcels are adjacent to Estates Elementary School. 3.Does the property offer opportunities for protection of water resource values, including aquifer recharge, water quality enhancement, protection of wetland dependant species habitat, and flood control? Ord. 2002-63, Sec. 10 (1)(c) ®Yes ❑No These properties contain wetlands and therefore provide habitat for wetland dependent species. These properties contribute significantly to both the Lower Tamiami Aquifer and Surficial Aquifer. The ability of these parcels to contribute to flood control is unknown, though from the presence of hydrologic indicators such as cypress knees and buttressed trunks, and open marshes, the properties appear to contain surface water for at least part of the year. 4. Does the property offer significant biological values, including biodiversity, listed species habitat, connectivity, restoration potential and ecological quality? Ord. 2002-63, Sec. 10 (1)(d) ®Yes ❑No Listed plant and animal species have been documented within the Panther Walk Preserve. These parcels all fall within the same wetland system as the Preserve. The native plant communities present within these parcels provide additional habitat for a suite of upland and wetland dependent species, and wildlife including the Florida panther and black bear. 5. Does the property enhance and/or protect the environmental value of current conservation lands through function as a buffer, ecological link or habitat corridor? Ord. 2002-63, Sec. 10 (1)(e) ®Yes ❑No The parcels fall within the Horsepen Strand which flows from south from Corkscrew Regional Ecosystem Watershed (CREW) owned by the South Florida Water Management District and Audubon Florida. Is the property within the boundary of another agency's acquisition project? ❑Yes ®No If yes, will use of Conservation Collier funds leverage a significantly higher rank or funding priority for the parcel? Dyes ❑No Without such funding circumstances, Conservation Collier funds shall not be available forpurchase of these lands. Ord. 2002-63, Sec. 10 (1)(f) MEETS INITIAL SCREENING CRITERIA ®Yes ❑No 72NDAVE -NE; ' 0 a > in BEHNKE, LOTS J 0 I Q J 70TH AVE NE w ui 4SELVIG, MAROETH L { WRIGHT, DAVID V o PLATT RD ' _ z uj rr MOYLAN, PAUL EDINAR 6sTH AVE NE HAUGHTON, VERONICA MACRINA, KATHLEEN D&J INVESTORS 66TH AVE NE P S& N E SANCHEZ REV/L/TRUST 4 Fl/GROSSMAN TR, BARRY L '-64TH AVE NE..a, THOMMEN III, WtLLIAM F --`— JOYCE, DAVI.D 62ND AVE NE BURNS, SAN`DRA JOHNSON, TIMOTHY R=& JENETT MEYER TR, VIRGINIA M ��i PAVE NE c, HACKMANN TR, CHARLES W 4 r. KRONEMAN EXPRESS INC ' j 58TH AVE NE ANDER80N JR, CHARLES E=& LINDA r _ `> ANDERSON JR, CHARLES E' / _,,, GONZAL'EZ, ISABEL 1 Martha S. Vergara From:BrownAraqueSummer <Summer.Araque@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent:Friday, August 6, 2021 3:07 PM To:Bill Poteet; Brittany-Patterson Weber; Carl Kuehner; David Corban; Gary Bromley (bromley914 @comcast.net); Hannah Rinaldi; Michael Seef; Michele Lenhard (mrlenhard@me.com); Tom Iandimarino Cc:BelpedioJennifer; Minutes and Records; david.durrell@comcast.net; DrewKathlene Subject:RE: August 9, 2021 Conservation Collier Land Acquisition Advisory Committee Attachments:ISC Gore revised 8-6-21.pdf Follow Up Flag:Follow up Flag Status:Completed DO NOT REPLY TO ALL. LET ME KNOW DIRECTLY IF YOU HAVE QUESTIONS. Hi CCLAAC Members, Please note that I made a minor revision to the attached ISC. The revision is highlighted below. The Argay Estate listed on the agenda under item IV.A.1. was inadvertently left off the list at the top of the ISC report and has now been added (shown below). The parcel was identified on the agenda and the map. Please let me know if you have any questions. Respectfully, Summer Araque Conservation Collier Coordinator Parks and Recreation Division 3300 Santa Barbara Blvd, Naples Florida 34116 Phone: 239.252.2979 Cell: 239.289.9751 I am currently available on my cell at 289‐9751 www.conservationcollier.com 2 From: DrewKathlene <Kathlene.Drew@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Monday, August 2, 2021 2:53 PM To: Bill Poteet <Poteetproperties@gmail.com>; Brittany‐Patterson Weber <bpattersonweber@gmail.com>; Carl Kuehner <retcjk@aol.com>; David Corban <dmc@davidcorban.com>; Gary Bromley (bromley914@comcast.net) <bromley914@comcast.net>; Hannah Rinaldi <hannahrinaldi3@gmail.com>; Michael Seef <mdslogistics@aol.com>; Michele Lenhard (mrlenhard@me.com) <mrlenhard@me.com>; Tom Iandimarino <tomiandimarino@gmail.com> Cc: BrownAraqueSummer <Summer.Araque@colliercountyfl.gov>; HennigMelissa <Melissa.Hennig@colliercountyfl.gov>; DuVallMolly <Molly.DuVall@colliercountyfl.gov>; SeguraChristal <Christal.Segura@colliercountyfl.gov>; BarazowskiMitchell <Mitchell.Barazowski@colliercountyfl.gov>; JenkinsConnor <Connor.Jenkins@colliercountyfl.gov>; BelpedioJennifer <Jennifer.Belpedio@colliercountyfl.gov>; RodriguezDan <Dan.Rodriguez@colliercountyfl.gov>; WilliamsBarry <Barry.Williams@colliercountyfl.gov>; McPhersonJeanine <Jeanine.McPherson@colliercountyfl.gov>; HenryTodd <Todd.Henry@colliercountyfl.gov>; MinutesandRecords@collierclerk.com; david.durrell@comcast.net; meredithb@fwfonline.org; millercornell@mindspring.com; gdelgadillo@alumni.stanford.edu Subject: August 9, 2021 Conservation Collier Land Acquisition Advisory Committee DO NOT REPLY TO ALL. LET ME KNOW DIRECTLY IF YOU HAVE QUESTIONS. CCLAAC MEMBERS: The committee is required to have a quorum (5 members) attend in person. Members are encouraged to attend in person if possible. There is adequate space to physically distance members in the Board’s Chamber. Please reply to me individually if you will be attending in person. Likewise, please let me know, individually, if you will be joining on Zoom. Attached is the Agenda and materials for the August 9, 2021 Conservation Collier Land Acquisition Advisory Committee to be held in Commission Boardroom; W. Harmon Turner Building (Building “F”), Third Floor. 1. Agenda 2. Minutes from Last Meeting 3. New Business a. Acquisition Cycle 10 – Initial Screening Criteria 1. Dr. Robert H Gore III Preserve area parcels 2. Josef Magdalener property near Shell Island preserve 3. Emily Arnold property near Pepper Ranch preserve 4. Eugene Erjavec property near Rivers Road preserve 5. Panther Walk area parcels A Zoom meeting has been established for the public to participate, and any members over and above the in‐person quorum requirement; link is below. Join Zoom Meeting: https://us02web.zoom.us/meeting/register/tZcvdOCtqD0oEtORYt6GpB8N3Bp6MgaOifbG After registering, you will receive a confirmation email containing information about joining the meeting. Respectfully, Kathlene Drew, SHRM‐CP Administrative Assistant Notary Public 3 Conservation Collier Program Parks and Recreation Division Parks & Recreation - Be Healthy, Active & Playful Mission: To provide a diverse system of parks that support healthy lifestyles,strengthen our community, enrich our economy, and protect and sustain our environment. Vision: To provide a world-class system of parks, natural resources, and recreational opportunities which are essential for the quality of life in our community now, and in generations to come. 3300 Santa Barbara Blvd Naples, FL 34116 Phone: 239.252.2961 https://www.colliercountyfl.gov/conservationcollier Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. Conservation Collier Land Acquisition Program Initial Screening Criteria Revised 8-6-21* Property Owner(s), acreage, and folio: 4 properties owners total = 17.59 acres Kenneth Cedeno – 2.81 acres (41504760009) Eugene D’angelo – 5 acres (41661840008) Charels Bailey – 1.14 acres (41618160003) Carol Rudnick – 1.59 acres (41502560007) Argay Estate – 7.05 acres (41560360003)* Property Location: Dr. Robert H. Gore III preserve area – existing preserve 171.2 acres Nominations to the Conservation Collier Program are based on satisfying at least two of the initial screening criteria below. Qualified sites shall then be further prioritized by secondary evaluative criteria. 1. Are any of the following unique and endangered plant communities found on the property? Order of preference as follows: Ord. 2002-63, Sec. 10 (1)(a) Yes No a. Hardwood hammocks b. Xeric oak scrub c. Coastal strand d. Native beach e. Xeric pine f. High marsh (saline) g. Tidal freshwater marsh h. Other native habitats Wetland hardwoods; 6216-Cypress-Mixed Hardwoods; 6172-Mixed shrubs; 6210- Cypress 2. Does land offer significant human social values, such as equitable geographic distribution, appropriate access for nature-based recreation, and enhancement of the aesthetic setting of Collier County? Ord. 2002-63, Sec. 10 (1)(b) Yes No These four parcels would be an expansion of the existing Conservation Collier Dr. Robert H. Gore III preserve. The parcels have access from public roads: Desoto Blvd., 36th Ave. SE, 38th Ave. SE , and 40th Ave. Desoto is paved road, as well as 38th Ave. SE and 40th Ave. SE. These parcels are immediately adjacent to or across the street from the existing preserve. All properties could accommodate seasonal outdoor recreation and expansion of existing and planned trails. 3. Does the property offer opportunities for protection of water resource values, including aquifer recharge, water quality enhancement, protection of wetland dependant species habitat, and flood control? Ord. 2002-63, Sec. 10 (1)(c) Yes No The plant communities found on the properties were mostly consistent with mapped soils, and the properties contain wetlands and wetland plant communities. As such, they provide habitat for wetland-dependent species. The properties are not mapped as contributing significantly to the Tamiami Aquifer, but they are mapped as contributing moderately to the Surficial Aquifer. Wetlands can serve as a buffer to filter contaminated water. Since surface water in this area flows towards the I-75 canal, and wetlands on the parcels may help to clean runoff before it enters the I- 75 canal. The Rudnick and Cedeno parcels hold water during wet season and can be expected to contribute to flood control in the local area. The presence of hydrologic indicators such as cypress knees, karst and water marks on buttressed cypress trunks provides evidence of seasonal flooding. 4. Does the property offer significant biological values, including biodiversity, listed species habitat, connectivity, restoration potential and ecological quality? Ord. 2002-63, Sec. 10 (1)(d) Yes No These parcels are mapped as having above-average biodiversity. Wildlife monitoring cameras within the preserve area indicate high utilization by Florida panther, Florida black bear, white tailed deer, wild turkey, spotted skunk, and nesting birds. The parcels in application (with the exception of D’angelo parcel) would need to have the Brazilian pepper (Schinus terebinthifolius) removed from the properties as was done with the existing preserve parcels. The D’Angelo parcel understory and Brazilian pepper infestation was mechanically removed in 2018, the property is maintained through regular mowing. The 171.2-acre preserve has been entirely treated for exotic vegetation and is now under maintenance. Adding onto the preserve will provide additional acreage that will not be developed and in turn will be available for wildlife utilization. 5. Does the property enhance and/or protect the environmental value of current conservation lands through function as a buffer, ecological link or habitat corridor? Ord. 2002-63, Sec. 10 (1)(e) Yes No These properties are within a historic wetland area that connects on the east side with the Florida Panther National Wildlife Refuge (FPNWR) via the vehicle test track, about a mile and a half away. The Gore properties would enhance or protect the FPNWR primarily by acting as a buffer and providing a reasonably large sized wild land addition north of I-75. There are Wildlife underpasses at the FakaUnion and Miller Canal. Just south of FPNWR and the I-75 corridor, is the Fakahatchee Strand State Preserve, about 2.5 miles from the properties. Panthers who utilize the existing 2 underpasses under I-75 (the Faka Union and Miller canals) could access the preserve. A little over 2 miles to the west are the North Belle Meade sending lands. In 2007, Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC) biologists did not encourage use of the area to corridor panthers farther west into North Belle Meade due to increasing development in that area. At present, FWC would support the acquisition of this property for panther habitat, but cautions about defining a westward corridor because there is no master plan that identifies it as such and there are developed lands west of Everglades Blvd. Potential for a future Everglades access to I-75 is also a noted obstacle in the way of a habitat corridor. The Picayune Strand State Forest is directly to the south across I-75. Panthers could move south from the Fakaunion canal, just south of the properties, into the Picayune creating an ecological link and habitat corridor. The Gore properties are located within a Primary Panther Habitat Zone. Is the property within the boundary of another agency’s acquisition project? Yes No If yes, will use of Conservation Collier funds leverage a significantly higher rank or funding priority for the parcel? Yes No Without such funding circumstances, Conservation Collier funds shall not be available for purchase of these lands. Ord. 2002-63, Sec. 10 (1)(f) MEETS INITIAL SCREENING CRITERIA Yes No 26.A.b AGENDA CONSERVATION COLLIER LAND ACQUISITION ADVISORY COMMITTEE August 9, 2021, 9:00 A.M. Commission Boardroom r W. Harmon Turner Building (Building "F"), Third Floor c N As part of an ongoing initiative to promote social distancing during the Covid-19 pandemic, the public will have the opportunity to provide public comments remotely, as well as in person. Individuals who would like to participate remotely, should register here. Individuals who register will receive an email in advance of the public hearing detailing Q how they can participate remotely in this meeting. For additional information about the meeting, please call Summer ' Araque at (239) 252-2979 or email to: ConservationCollierkcolliercount,r�fl.gov I. Roll Call o II. Approval of Agenda U III. Approval of July 12, 2021, Meeting Minutes N IV. New Business Q c A. Acquisition Cycle 10 — Initial Screening Criteria ° r T 1. Dr. Robert H. Gore III Preserve area parcels a Argay Estate (7.05 acres), Kenneth Cedeno (2.81), Eugene D'angelo (5), Charles Edwin Bailey a (1.14), Carol Rudnick - DONATION (1.59) c R 2. Josef Magdalener property near Shell Island preserve J 3. Emily Arnold property near Pepper Ranch preserve 4. Eugene Erjavec property near Rivers Road preserve T 5. Panther Walk area parcels N Timothy R and Jenett Johnson (1.14 acres), Veronica Naughton (2.73), Barry L Grossman Trust r (2.73), Isabel Gonzalez (1.14), Charles W Hackmann (2.73), Virginia M Meyer Trust (1.59), Linda and Charles E Anderson Jr (1.14, 2.27), Kroneman Express (2.27), David Joyce (2.27), D&J Investors LLC (1.14), David V Wright (1.14), Sandra Burns (1.14), Kathleen Macrina (1.14), Paul Q Edward Moylan (2.73), Maribeth L Selvig (1.14), Lois J Behnke (1.14), William F Thommen III (5), m and the PS & NE Sanchez Rev Trust (2.73) c m a� Q B. Acquisition Cycle 10 — updates on applications received V. Old Business A. Preserve Updates a VI. Coordinator Communications U A. BCC Items — none since last meeting c B. Meetings for 2022 — scheduled for first Wednesday of the month at 1 pm C. Miscellaneous Items U a Q Packet Pg. 504 26.A.b VII. Subcommittee Reports A. Lands Evaluation & Management — Chair, Bill Poteet — next meeting September 8, 2021 B. Outreach — Chair, Brittany Patterson -Weber — last meeting March 24, 2021 C. Ordinance Policy and Rules —Chair selected Tom landimarino at last meeting July 28, 2021 Vill. Chair and Committee Member Comments IX. Public General Comments X. Staff Comments XI. Next Meeting — September 13, 2021 XII. Adjourn ****************************************************************************************************** Committee Members: Please notify Summer Araque at 252-2979 no later than 5:00 p.m. Thursday, August 5, 2021, if you cannot attend this meeting or if you have a conflict and will abstain from voting on an agenda item. Q Packet Pg. 505 26.A.c Conservation Collier Land Acquisition Program Initial Screening Criteria Property Owner(s), acreage, and folio: 4 properties owners total = 10.54 acres Kenneth Cedeno — 2.81 acres (41504760009) Eugene D'angelo — 5 acres (41661840008) Charels Bailey — 1.14 acres (41618160003) Carol Rudnick — 1.59 acres (41502560007) Property Location: Dr. Robert H. Gore III preserve area — existing preserve 171.2 acres Nominations to the Conservation Collier Program are based on satisfying at least two of the initial screening criteria below. Qualified sites shall then be further prioritized by secondary evaluative criteria. 1. Are any of the following unique and endangered plant communities found on the property? Order of preference as follows: Ord. 2002-63, sec. 10 (1)(a) Yes No a. Hardwood hammocks ❑ b. Xeric oak scrub ❑ c. Coastal strand ❑ d. Native beach ❑ e. Xeric pine ❑ f. High marsh (saline) ❑ g. Tidal freshwater marsh ❑ h. Other native habitats ® ❑ Wetland hardwoods; 6216-Cypress-Mixed Hardwoods; 6172-Mixed shrubs; 6210- Cypress 2. Does land offer significant human social values, such as equitable geographic distribution, appropriate access for nature -based recreation, and enhancement of the aesthetic setting of Collier County? Ord. 2002-63, sec.10 (1)(n) ®Yes ❑No These four parcels would be an expansion of the existing Conservation Collier Dr. Robert H. Gore III preserve. The parcels have access from public roads: Desoto Blvd., 36th Ave. SE, 38th Ave. SE , and 40th Ave. Desoto is paved road, as well as 38th Ave. SE and 40th Ave. SE. These parcels are immediately adjacent to or across the street from the existing preserve. All properties could accommodate seasonal outdoor recreation and expansion of existing and planned trails. 3. Does the property offer opportunities for protection of water resource values, including aquifer recharge, water quality enhancement, protection of wetland dependant species habitat, and flood control? Ord. 2002-63, sec.10 (1)(c) ®Yes ❑No The plant communities found on the properties were mostly consistent with mapped soils, and the properties contain wetlands and wetland plant communities. As such, they provide habitat for wetland -dependent species. The properties are not mapped as contributing significantly to the Tamiami Aquifer, but they are mapped as contributing moderately to the Surficial Aquifer. Wetlands can serve as a buffer to filter contaminated water. Since surface water in this area flows towards the I-75 canal, and wetlands on the parcels may help to clean runoff before it enters the I- 75 canal. The Rudnick and Cedeno parcels hold water during wet season and can be expected to contribute to flood control in the local area. The presence of hydrologic indicators such as cypress knees, karst and water marks on buttressed cypress trunks provides evidence of seasonal flooding. El Packet Pg. 506 26.A.c 4. Does the property offer significant biological values, including biodiversity, listed species habitat, connectivity, restoration potential and ecological quality? Ord. 2002-63, See.10 (1)(d) ®Yes ❑No These parcels are mapped as having above -average biodiversity. Wildlife monitoring cameras within the preserve area indicate high utilization by Florida panther, Florida black bear, white tailed deer, wild turkey, spotted skunk, and nesting birds. The parcels in application (with the -:1 T exception of D'angelo parcel) would need to have the Brazilian pepper (Schinus terebinthifolius) c removed from the properties as was done with the existing preserve parcels. The D'Angelo parcel a understory and Brazilian pepper infestation was mechanically removed in 2018, the property is maintained through regular mowing. The 171.2-acre preserve has been entirely treated for exotic vegetation and is now under maintenance. Adding onto the preserve will provide additional a acreage that will not be developed and in turn will be available for wildlife utilization. 5. Does the property enhance and/or protect the environmental value of current conservation lands through function as a buffer, ecological link or habitat corridor? Ord. 2002-63, See.10 (1)(e) ®Yes ❑No These properties are within a historic wetland area that connects on the east side with the Florida Panther National Wildlife Refuge (FPNWR) via the vehicle test track, about a mile and a half away. The Gore properties would enhance or protect the FPNWR primarily by acting as a buffer and providing a reasonably large sized wild land addition north of I-75. There are Wildlife underpasses at the FakaUnion and Miller Canal. Just south of FPNWR and the I-75 corridor, is the Fakahatchee Strand State Preserve, about 2.5 miles from the properties. Panthers who utilize the existing 2 underpasses under I-75 (the Faka Union and Miller canals) could access the preserve. A little over 2 miles to the west are the North Belle Meade sending lands. In 2007, Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC) biologists did not encourage use of the area to corridor panthers farther west into North Belle Meade due to increasing development in that area. At present, FWC would support the acquisition of this property for panther habitat, but cautions about defining a westward corridor because there is no master plan that identifies it as such and there are developed lands west of Everglades Blvd. Potential for a future Everglades access to I-75 is also a noted obstacle in the way of a habitat corridor. The Picayune Strand State Forest is directly to the south across I-75. Panthers could move south from the Fakaunion canal, just south of the properties, into the Picayune creating an ecological link and habitat corridor. The Gore properties are located within a Primary Panther Habitat Zone. Is the property within the boundary of another agency's acquisition project? ❑Yes ®No If yes, will use of Conservation Collier funds leverage a significantly higher rank or funding priority for the parcel? ❑Yes ®No Without such funding circumstances, Conservation Collier funds shall not be available forpurchase of these lands. Ord. 2002-63, Sec.10 (1)(1) MEETS INITIAL SCREENING CRITERIA ®Yes ❑No Packet Pg. 507 4ZOZ `6;snBnV - aa;;Iwwo3 AJOSlnpV uol;lslnbobr pue-1 : LtiLL0 a t0 cn N � CL U m � a cn o � 0 a J LA El OSI slowed eaid ajoE) �VAI :;uewyoejlvL--j —10 .. o LO a= a Z G> o Y u a s r r Lo U) LO o 0 (LZOZ `6;sn6nd - 00;;Iwwo:D iGoslnpd uoi;isinb:)b pue-1 : LtiLLO OSI slowed e0.ad 0aoc) �"j :;uewy0e}}v�;—.f. d N Ch 'o C C 0 60 CL 6w 0 L 0 Y 0 LO a m 0 � �c u ea a co _ 0 GO u O D r7 p J CA r 1 26.A.d Conservation Collier Land Acquisition Program Initial Screening Criteria Revised 8-6-21 * Property Owner(s), acreaze, and folio: 4 properties owners total = 17.59 acres Kenneth Cedeno — 2.81 acres (41504760009) Eugene D'angelo — 5 acres (41661840008) N Charels Bailey —1.14 acres (41618160003) r Carol Rudnick —1.59 acres (41502560007) Argay Estate — 7.05 acres (41560360003)* a Property Location: Dr. Robert H. Gore III preserve area — existing preserve 171.2 acres Nominations to the Conservation Collier Program are based on satisfying at least two of the initial screening criteria below. Qualified sites shall then be further prioritized by secondary evaluative criteria. 1. Are any of the following unique and endangered plant communities found on the property? Order of preference as follows: Ord. 2002-63, sec. 10 (1)(a) Yes No a. Hardwood hammocks ❑ ❑ b. Xeric oak scrub ❑ c. Coastal strand ❑ d. Native beach ❑ ❑ e. Xeric pine ❑ ❑ f. High marsh (saline) ❑ g. Tidal freshwater marsh ❑ h. Other native habitats ❑ ❑ Wetland hardwoods; 6216-Cypress-Mixed Hardwoods; 6172-Mixed shrubs; 6210- Cypress 2. Does land offer significant human social values, such as equitable geographic distribution, appropriate access for nature -based recreation, and enhancement of the aesthetic setting of Collier County? Ord. 2002-63, sec. 10 (1)(b) ®Yes ❑No These four parcels would be an expansion of the existing Conservation Collier Dr. Robert H. Gore III preserve. The parcels have access from public roads: Desoto Blvd., 36th Ave. SE, 38th Ave. SE , and 40th Ave. Desoto is paved road, as well as 38th Ave. SE and 40th Ave. SE. These parcels are immediately adjacent to or across the street from the existing preserve. All properties could accommodate seasonal outdoor recreation and expansion of existing and planned trails. 3. Does the property offer opportunities for protection of water resource values, including aquifer recharge, water quality enhancement, protection of wetland dependant species habitat, and flood control? Ord. 2002-63, See. 10 (1)(c) ®Yes [:]No The plant communities found on the properties were mostly consistent with mapped soils, and the properties contain wetlands and wetland plant communities. As such, they provide habitat for wetland -dependent species. The properties are not mapped as contributing significantly to the Tamiami Aquifer, but they are mapped as contributing moderately to the Surficial Aquifer. Wetlands can serve as a buffer to filter contaminated water. Since surface water in this area flows towards the I-75 canal, and wetlands on the parcels may help to clean runoff before it enters the I- 75 canal. The Rudnick and Cedeno parcels hold water during wet season and can be expected to contribute to flood control in the local area. The presence of hydrologic indicators such as cypress knees, karst and water marks on buttressed cypress trunks provides evidence of seasonal flooding. Packet Pg. 510 26.A.d 4. Does the property offer significant biological values, including biodiversity, listed species habitat, connectivity, restoration potential and ecological quality? Ord. 2002-63, Sec. 10 (1)(d) ®Yes ❑No These parcels are mapped as having above -average biodiversity. Wildlife monitoring cameras within the preserve area indicate high utilization by Florida panther, Florida black bear, white tailed deer, wild turkey, spotted skunk, and nesting birds. The parcels in application (with the exception of D'angelo parcel) would need to have the Brazilian pepper (Schinus terebinthifolius) removed from the properties as was done with the existing preserve parcels. The D'Angelo parcel understory and Brazilian pepper infestation was mechanically removed in 2018, the property is maintained through regular mowing. The 171.2-acre preserve has been entirely treated for exotic vegetation and is now under maintenance. Adding onto the preserve will provide additional acreage that will not be developed and in turn will be available for wildlife utilization. 5. Does the property enhance and/or protect the environmental value of current conservation lands through function as a buffer, ecological link or habitat corridor? Ord. 2002-63, Sec. 10 (1)(e) ®Yes ❑No These properties are within a historic wetland area that connects on the east side with the Florida Panther National Wildlife Refuge (FPNWR) via the vehicle test track, about a mile and a half away. The Gore properties would enhance or protect the FPNWR primarily by acting as a buffer and providing a reasonably large sized wild land addition north of I-75. There are Wildlife underpasses at the FakaUnion and Miller Canal. Just south of FPNWR and the I-75 corridor, is the Fakahatchee Strand State Preserve, about 2.5 miles from the properties. Panthers who utilize the existing 2 underpasses under I-75 (the Faka Union and Miller canals) could access the preserve. A little over 2 miles to the west are the North Belle Meade sending lands. In 2007, Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC) biologists did not encourage use of the area to corridor panthers farther west into North Belle Meade due to increasing development in that area. At present, FWC would support the acquisition of this property for panther habitat, but cautions about defining a westward corridor because there is no master plan that identifies it as such and there are developed lands west of Everglades Blvd. Potential for a future Everglades access to I-75 is also a noted obstacle in the way of a habitat corridor. The Picayune Strand State Forest is directly to the south across I-75. Panthers could move south from the Fakaunion canal, just south of the properties, into the Picayune creating an ecological link and habitat corridor. The Gore properties are located within a Primary Panther Habitat Zone. Is the property within the boundary of another agency's acquisition project? Dyes ®No If yes, will use of Conservation Collier funds leverage a significantly higher rank or funding priority for the parcel? ❑Yes ®No Without such funding circumstances, Conservation Collier funds shall not be available for purchase of these lands. Ord. 2002-63, Sec. 10 (1)(f) MEETS INITIAL SCREENING CRITERIA ®Yes ❑No Packet Pg. 511 - GOIJI MOO tiosinpd uoilisinboV pue- : LtiLLO 6Z-9-9 paSIAaJ OSI slowed eaid ajoE) 6VAJ :;uewLjae;jd N Q N a� LO CL ., a rr — Z O G> v a � a � co 4 s J � LA El r r Lo N LO o 0 - aa;;lu WOO iGoslnpd uolllslnb3V pue-1 : LVLL0 �Z-9-9 paSIAaJ osl slowed eaid ajoE) WAI :;uat uyoe;;d J cm d N Ch 'o C C 0 60 CL 6w 0 L 0 Y J CD to N IL co Qy 0 0 CD LO a m ea a cA r 1 26.A.e Conservation Collier Land Acquisition Program Initial Screening Criteria Property Owner: Josef Magdalener Parcel(s) acreage: 18.73 Property Location: Adjacent to Shell Island Preserve, SE of Collier Blvd and Port Au Prince Drive Nominations to the Conservation Collier Program are based on satisfying at least two of the initial screening criteria below. Qualified sites shall then be further prioritized by secondary evaluative criteria. 1. Are any of the following unique and endangered plant communities found on the property? Order of preference as follows: Ord. 2002-63, Sec. 10 (1)(a) Yes No a. Hardwood hammocks ❑ b. Xeric oak scrub ❑ c. Coastal strand ❑ d. Native beach ❑ e. Xeric pine ❑ f. High marsh (saline) ® ❑ g. Tidal freshwater marsh ® ❑ h. Other native habitats _pine flatwood, cabbage palm forest ® ❑ 2. Does land offer significant human social values, such as equitable geographic distribution, appropriate access for nature -based recreation, and enhancement of the aesthetic setting of Collier County? Ord. 2002-63, See.10 (1)(b) ®Yes [—]No This property is within the Urban Coastal Fringe and visible from a major County Road. It is adjacent to other Conservation Collier land and is accessible via Port Au Prince Rd. 3. Does the property offer opportunities for protection of water resource values, including aquifer recharge, water quality enhancement, protection of wetland dependant species habitat, and flood control? Ord. 2002-63, Sec.10 (1)(c) ®Yes [:]No The parcel has a mapped surficial recharge capacity of 43 to 56" annually, considered moderate. The parcel has a mapped Lower Tamiami recharge capacity of -48" to -32" indicating it a discharge area. Surface water is present throughout the property during the wet season, wetland dependent vegetation exists on site and the property provides foraging habitat for wading birds. 4. Does the property offer significant biological values, including biodiversity, listed species habitat, connectivity, restoration potential and ecological quality? Ord. 2002-63, See.10 (1)(d) ®Yes ❑No This parcel enhances connectivity with adjacent Conservation Collier Preserve and Rookery Bay National Estuarine Research Reserve. Existing plant communities indicate utilization by imperiled bird species. Florida panther telemetry location data indicates utilization of habitat within 1000ft of the parcel boundary. 5. Does the property enhance and/or protect the environmental value of current conservation lands through function as a buffer, ecological link or habitat corridor? Ord. 2002-63, See.10 (1)(e) ®Yes ❑No The parcel provides connectivity with Conservation Collier Shell Island Preserve and the Rookery Bay National Estuarine Research Reserve. Is the property within the boundary of another agency's acquisition project? ®Yes ❑No If yes, will use of Conservation Collier funds leverage a significantly higher rank or funding priority for the parcel? ❑Yes ❑No Without such funding circumstances, Conservation Collier funds shall not be available for purchase of these lands. Ord. 2002-63, Sec.10 (1)(f) MEETS INITIAL SCREENING CRITERIA ®Yes ❑No N 0 N of N 7 El Packet Pg. 514 DMZ `6 }sn6nV - aa}}iu WOO tiosinpd uoi}isinboV pue-1 : LtiLLO OSI aaualep6ew jasor zvAi :}ueua W co d N 0 U c 0 w z 0 v J J LO a d v R a T- U) U') 0) O C 26.A.f Conservation Collier Land Acquisition Program Initial Screening Criteria Property Owner Emily Arnold Parcel(s) acreage: 5 acres Property Location: Adjacent to the south of the Pepper Ranch Preserve south of Trafford Oaks Road Immokalee, FL Nominations to the Conservation Collier Program are based on satisfying at least two of the initial screening criteria below. Qualified sites shall then be further prioritized by secondary evaluative criteria. 1. Are any of the following unique and endangered plant communities found on the property? Order of preference as follows: Ord. 2002-63, sec. 10 (1)(a) Yes No a. Hardwood hammocks ❑ b. Xeric oak scrub ❑ c. Coastal strand ❑ d. Native beach ❑ e. Xeric pine ❑ f. High marsh (saline) ❑ g. Tidal freshwater marsh ❑ h. Other native habitats ® ❑ 2. Does land offer significant human social values, such as equitable geographic distribution, appropriate access for nature -based recreation, and enhancement of the aesthetic setting of Collier County? Ord. 2002-63, sec. 10 (1)(b) ❑Yes ®No This parcel is adiacent to the 2.512 acre Penner Ranch Preserve and can be directiv accessed from Trafford Oaks Road. However, Trafford Oaks Road is a private road with a security gate that would prohibit public access. There is also and aericultural fence alone the north side of Trafford Oaks road alone the southern boundary of Penner Ranch Preserve which is necessary to keep cattle in. 3. Does the property offer opportunities for protection of water resource values, including aquifer recharge, water quality enhancement, protection of wetland dependant species habitat, and flood control? Ord. 2002-63, sec. 10 (1)(c) ®Yes ❑No Acquisition of this property would offer increased opportunities for protection of water resource values, includingrecharge echarge of the surficial aquifer and protection of wetland dependent species habitat. The aerial map indicates that at least 50% of the property contains wetlands. A moderate surficial recharge rate would also indicate habitat for wetland dependent species is present most of the year. A primary benefit to preserving the offered lands in an undeveloped state would be protection of the Corkscrew swamp and marsh complex and wetlands associated with Lake Trafford. The Corkscrew swamp and marsh complex provide recharge for the Lower Tamiami aquifer, a source of drinking water for many Coun . and private wells east of Count 951. Acquisition of this parcel would add to the protection of the quality of this water source by increasing the buffering of the Corkscrew slough from development and non -point source pollution. 4. Does the property offer significant biological values, including biodiversity, listed species habitat, connectivity, restoration potential and ecological quality? Ord. 2002-63, sec. 10 (i)(d) ®Yes ❑No This parcel would provide significant biological values, listed species habitat, restoration potential and moderate to high ecological quality. We can assume that the same important wildlife species documented on the adjacent Pepper Ranch also utilize this property including the Florida Panther, Black Bear and multiple bird species. There is significant restoration potential for forested areas N O N O r W 0 a� Packet Pg. 516 26.A.f impacted by invasive exotic plants. This parcel is adjacent to significant County, State, and private conservation lands. 5. Does the property enhance and/or protect the environmental value of current conservation lands through function as a buffer, ecological link or habitat corridor? Ord. 2002-63, Sec. 10 (1)(e) ®Yes ❑No Preservation and restoration of this parcel would protect the value of the Corkscrew Marsh functioning as buffer to the 60,000 South Florida Water Management District conserved lands that include the CREW Marsh wetlands and as ecological link and corridor for the Camp Keais Strand and other conservation lands to the south. The parcel is adjacent to and contributes to an important wildlife corridor through the adjacent Pepper Ranch Preserve and other state owned conservation land. Is the property within the boundary of another agency's acquisition project? ❑Yes ®No If yes, will use of Conservation Collier funds leverage a significantly higher rank or funding priority for the parcel? ❑Yes ®No Without such funding circumstances, Conservation Collier funds shall not be available for purchase of these lands. Ord. 2002-63, Sec. 10 (1)(t) MEETS INITIAL SCREENING CRITERIA ®Yes ❑No N O N ai r a� Packet Pg. 517 (LZOZ `6;sn6my - aa;;!wwoo AaoslnpV uol;!slnb3V pue- : LtiLLO OSI plouiV AI!w3 EVAI :;uauayoeliv 00 LO co � a i} d L O C Er 4 O k k' � OL w a- W J 'i 'i C 7 cu bm u C o ID d b o L4 (LZOZ `6;sn6my - aa;;!wwoo AaoslnpV uol;!slnb3V pue- : LtiLLO OSI plouiV AI!w3 EVAI :;uGwt43elIV o`a a- D L C Q ` f-r W Q ML J o + 26.A.g Conservation Collier Land Acquisition Program Initial Screening Criteria Property Owner: Eugene Erjavec Parcel(s) acreage: 4.92 acres Property Location: 1760 Krape Road near Rivers Road Preserve; folio 00214880003 Nominations to the Conservation Collier Program are based on satisfying at least two of the initial screening criteria below. Qualified sites shall then be further prioritized by secondary evaluative criteria. 1. Are any of the following unique and endangered plant communities found on the property? Order of preference as follows: Ord. 2002-63, Sec. 10 (1)(a) Yes No a. Hardwood hammocks ❑ b. Xeric oak scrub ❑ c. Coastal strand ❑ d. Native beach ❑ e. Xeric pine ❑ f. High marsh (saline) ❑ g. Tidal freshwater marsh ❑ h. Other native habitats:-Cypress/Pine/cabbage Palm_ ® ❑ 2. Does land offer significant human social values, such as equitable geographic distribution, appropriate access for nature -based recreation, and enhancement of the aesthetic setting of Collier County? Ord. 2002-63, See.10 (1)(b) ®Yes [—]No This property may be accessed via Krape Road and offers land -based opportunities for natural resource - based recreation consistent with the goals of this program, including but not limited to, environmental education, hiking, and nature photography. It is adjacent to the Popp parcel and is located approximately 670ft west and 720ft south of the Rivers Road Preserve. 3. Does the property offer opportunities for protection of water resource values, including aquifer recharge, water quality enhancement, protection of wetland dependant species habitat, and flood control? Ord. 2002-63, Sec.10 (1)(c) ®Yes ❑No The property contains wetlands and therefore provides habitat for wetland dependent species. The property contributes significantly to both the Lower Tamiami Aquifer and Surficial Aquifer. The ability of these parcels to contribute to flood control is unknown, though from the presence of hydrologic indicators such as cypress knees and buttressed trunks, the property appears to contain surface water for at least part of the year. 4. Does the property offer significant biological values, including biodiversity, listed species habitat, connectivity, restoration potential and ecological quality? Ord. 2002-63, Sec.10 (1)(d) ®Yes ❑No Listed plant and animal species have been documented on the 76-acre Rivers Road Preserve to the northeast of this parcel. The native plant communities on this parcel provide additional habitat for a suite of upland and wetland dependent species, and wildlife including the Florida panther black bear. 5. Does the property enhance and/or protect the environmental value of current conservation lands through function as a buffer, ecological link or habitat corridor? Ord. 2002-63, See.10 (1)(e) ®Yes ❑No The parcel contributes to an important wildlife corridor connecting two private conservation easements through a wildlife crossing under Immokalee Road to the over 60,000-acre Corkscrew Regional Ecosystem Watershed (CREW) owned by the South Florida Water Management District and Audubon Florida. N O N a� E, Packet Pg. 520 26.A.g Is the property within the boundary of another agency's acquisition project? ❑Yes ®No If yes, will use of Conservation Collier funds leverage a significantly higher rank or funding priority for the parcel? ❑Yes ❑No Without such funding circumstances, Conservation Collier funds shall not be available for purchase of these lands. Ord. 2002-63, Sec. 10 (1)(1) MEETS INITIAL SCREENING CRITERIA ®Yes ❑No r N O N N 3 Im 7 Packet Pg. 521 DMZ `6;sn6my - oo;;lu WOO /Goslnpd uol;lsinbod pue-1 : LVLLO T N � i E w i cm o a_ 0 � > U) > c LU iE U ❑�i V L m ci m 'L W 3SI 3onefJ3 ouo6n3 -PVAI :}uouayoePV N v � IL a+ Z d O V R IL U) co a) o 0 26.A.h Conservation Collier Land Acquisition Program Initial Screening Criteria Property Owners and Parcel Acreage: 19 parcels total Timothy R and Jenett Johnson (1.14), Veronica Haughton (2.73), Barry L Grossman Trust (2.73), Isabel Gonzalez (L 14), Charles W Hackmann (2.73), Virginia M Meyer Trust (1.59), Linda and Charles E Anderson Jr (1.14, 2.27), Kroneman Express (2.27), David Joyce (2.27), D&J Investors LLC (1.14), David V Wright (1.14), Sandra Burns (1.14), Kathleen Macrina (1.14), Paul Edward Moylan (2.73), Maribeth L Selvig (1.14), Lois J Behnke (1.14), William F Thommen III (5), and the PS & NE Sanchez Rev Trust (2.73) N Parcel(s) acreage: 37.31 acres total Property Location: Panther Walk preserve area; West of Everglades Blvd between 58t" Ave NE v and 72nd Ave NE Q Nominations to the Conservation Collier Program are based on satisfying at least two of the initial screening criteria below. Qualified sites shall then be further prioritized by secondary evaluative criteria. 1. Are any of the following unique and endangered plant communities found on the property? Order of preference as follows: Ord. 2002-63, sec. 10 (1)(a) Yes No a. Hardwood hammocks ❑ b. Xeric oak scrub ❑ c. Coastal strand ❑ d. Native beach ❑ e. Xeric pine ❑ f. High marsh (saline) ❑ g. Tidal freshwater marsh ❑ h. Other native habitats: Cypress, Marshes, Hydric Pine Flatwoods, Mesic Flatwoods, Cypress/Tupelo ® ❑ 2. Does land offer significant human social values, such as equitable geographic distribution, appropriate access for nature -based recreation, and enhancement of the aesthetic setting of Collier County? Ord. 2002-63, Sec. 10 (1)(b) ®Yes [—]No These properties may be accessed from several roads between 58`h Ave NE and 70t1i Ave NE off Everglades Boulevard North. The parcels offer land -based opportunities for natural resource -based recreation consistent with the goals of this program, including but not limited to, environmental education, hiking, and naturel photography. Several of these parcels are adjacent to Estates Elementary School. 3.Does the property offer opportunities for protection of water resource values, including aquifer recharge, water quality enhancement, protection of wetland dependant species habitat, and flood control? Ord. 2002-63, Sec. 10 (1)(c) ®Yes ❑No These properties contain wetlands and therefore provide habitat for wetland dependent species. These properties contribute significantly to both the Lower Tamiami Aquifer and Surficial Aquifer. The ability of these parcels to contribute to flood control is unknown, though from the presence of hydrologic indicators such as cypress knees and buttressed trunks, and open marshes, the properties appear to contain surface water for at least part of the year. 4. Does the property offer significant biological values, including biodiversity, listed species habitat, connectivity, restoration potential and ecological quality? Ord. 2002-63, Sec. 10 (1)(d) ®Yes ❑No Listed plant and animal species have been documented within the Panther Walk Preserve. These parcels all fall within the same wetland system as the Preserve. The native plant communities present within these parcels provide additional habitat for a suite of upland and wetland dependent species, and wildlife including the Florida panther and black bear. Packet Pg. 523 26.A.h 5. Does the property enhance and/or protect the environmental value of current conservation lands through function as a buffer, ecological link or habitat corridor? Ord. 2002-63, Sec. 10 (1)(e) ®Yes ❑No The parcels fall within the Horsepen Strand which flows from south from Corkscrew Regional Ecosystem Watershed (CREW) owned by the South Florida Water Management District and Audubon Florida. Is the property within the boundary of another agency's acquisition project? ❑Yes ®No If yes, will use of Conservation Collier funds leverage a significantly higher rank or funding priority for the parcel? Dyes [:]No Without such funding circumstances, Conservation Collier funds shall not be available forpurchase of these lands. Ord. 2002-63, Sec. 10 (1)(f) MEETS INITIAL SCREENING CRITERIA ®Yes [:]No Packet Pg. 524 00 1 Z% 0 w Ld W z < _Q Ir z < LLJ > Lij i 4- - F- T *Ll a.: NldWG3WAF r I- - 0011!WWOO AJOSIAPV uoij!sinboV pue-1 : LtLLO POAOIDOM suoileoilddV 0� aloAo jo Adoo :Iuowtloellv ax -o g 2 E E 8 E 15 o o 13 't In ii 6 8 8 oo 2 d 6 Ri F I E 1 -m a a1 R I R R I E 2 2 2 2 .1 E - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - aa;;iu WOO Aaosinpy uoi;isinboy pue-1 : LbLLO panaioab suoi;eoilddy p� alOA0jo Adoo :;uauayoepv '00 (:J) U -� Cf) LIO :tf c -41 I El rA `g;snBnV - OO;;IWWo:D AJOSInpV uoi;isinboV pue-1 : LtiLL0 6ZOZ }snGnV sei:pedOad OSI :WOMPeW Q CD N ai Z_ m 4) ~ _� LU i� c6 y O O io W O 0 xa O o N 3 Q J >, z z c 1= g _o a>i Cl)v� OE y m Z O Co N-0 n = c� y -0 Co O � > O Q u_ C d V Z c CoQV 0 O Q w w U CL a co md 0 JG> �+ O �+ O t9Ein w >C,) 3 E� �� +' Z, V O' 0 0 -I " 'O � C o V V W O O c0 O y .� W O U N p N a) OCL/) :aE�i o�� d V ' > O iO W O > .00d c (n >QQ �d"-� a) LL O o m r a)Q �a �i� LLB' _ i J ,a I Q++ yam.. V �.�% L D o a) w. 0 mcn ai c_v a V V V L O '� a .� L H d fn c L x W y +� ?� cv >' a) O O L) _ �L (o U) C U N� O V V O O C a) W 3 d 0 O O = N 5 E O toD �, (n > a) w V d ++ N� coCG 4 a 4- N O� _ to d C L c6 0 O N O Q 0)= � LL = O G1 R U) w+ "� w V O E R LL O Q d N :3 O O O L c N L O W +' i sZ � Q O O O O� y H +± O i lj 06 W N _> W y O U) a) E W U m d lC �% 'C N O N J M O_ 1 O V O d Q L.Q N H L O y to L O c0 O� O N O Q Q a(� O y C E Q U c fn i> W CD 0 ^ Z Z 4) 00 p 0� W y_ E d y (! 1 W c6 ._ W E ca O L zLLj ._ VLJJ w N �' 0o WY 3 u_ w J N Q O O_0 0 0 'F ._ a 4) V 0 QU) �a a a -0 O� L Jcncn U z� zea am vm.0 '+ L , N M a) N Lf) Cb a m m a k q % IsnBnV - ems wwoo Aio InpV uomm nb V pub :L LLO Lzoz IsnBnV s |:pa o d oS eeew Lj3e nv _ (D C _ 2 £ E CU Cocn C k c !] $ q 'a m 2 E 2 R, m k E o E \ 7 3 ± : 0 §E ƒ §| @ - 7 * ® _ ± a)\ k _ Jcm @ 0 ® ® o 0 F E / _ � E �m M0 \ k \ co $ ° £ U CT o a c m � ƒ k k 2 § � 2 3 D Q �� / ± % > a)0 E.7 : o / § 7 - R _ � k CL ) § U ± \ �x 2g _0® ° k % cn k 3 � � � $ e ) E y 2 ) C: % % . . § I E / § G 6 q ƒ / 3 \ > ./ > % 3 \± k % \n W _ M 7 -0 « c _ o 0 2 0 E a)u 2 -0 � \ _0F E £ cn c @ ° o \ f E % n o / \ ® 0 k o •- _ o ƒ = Q / / . / o - ; % -0 ƒ > 2 / > m m o $■ 2 20£ M E '5/ G. _ a �§ Z - ' e / \ g \ o .ƒ 7 0 \ m ® § n m E? 2 0: o- 7 k ƒ / cr Q = 'cr / 2 k � E E \ = E 0 / E � � � £ E m U = .o v /) �_ k D o o £ 2 k a /.g § 2 2 / 2 -C� @ a e m c cn° e \ / ƒ 2 \� �� ® k k\ E» / / o E f 2} CM / $ $ / ƒ M 2 k aE£ 02 2 o® ƒf 2 ��ƒ �/ // 3{/ E _/ $ 2.r 2 2 2§ 2 k 2 d § o > c-0 c$ = e@ -1�� E E 2 E co L 2 m E o 2 QL E� 2 2 E o@ « U a � > 70 (n O ® U `6IsnBnV - aa;;Iu WO:D AJOSInpV uoi;isinboV pue-1 : LtiLLO IZOZ;sn6nV sai:padoad OSI :;uauayoejjv W co 70 /�W/ LL F- L O a) 4— O U) ^L W � 0- 0 ,7p; T— m Q) L Q) Q) Q U s= m L Q) Q ^Q L.L L m c Q) Q Q _0 O s✓ Q E w M u m `g;snBnV - aa;;Iua Q co N WOO AJOSInpV uoi;isinboV pue-1 : LtiLL0 6ZOZ }snGnV sei:pedc � n m � u�i n J z /L^ y, % ` O O W M W W O O ry U � cu — E O cn rn C) - U J Q ti >, o O t ca zQ a� La — c co a U) U� UJ U p E � O w ry Q � U � U gad OSI :}uauayoe}}d N <� Lo a� g d Y V d O `g;snBnV - 0011Iuau O:D AJOSInpV uoi;isinboV pue-1 : LtiLL0 6ZOZ }snGnV sei:pedoad OSI :}u0ua M44V cu 01 D 4- cu t ry +j D QJ 4- 0 QJ s o ro +j 4-1 c O V1 TC \� v L +-1 ru � o L Z L / r V J � c LO -0 ro a- � 0 _0 aj _o u_ p ' L z L L u v n Z L D `g }sn6nd - aa;;Iuauaoo AiOSInpV uoi;isinbod pue-1 : LbLLO 6ZOZ;snBnV sei:pedoad OSI :;uauayoe;;d m �+ N m L c O R C> t m c o i O O L O V V 4R OL d to iy y 0. L yamLL,. V m c4 a = L O O (n O Q 7 � 'v a m = (D to O O to N U C O to 70 rn V O t W rn = O is m 0) m W U �R 0 N 0)0 > ° > Cj o o d Vm o c 0 v -0 ca = = L- 'a C > > a o (n c L o = ca o° Nod>X 3� °' z IL c >, t c a� O O C ca (D R L > d in W c-0 ; x U O N N i Q a) a) Q d dO Op to t�� ON�w � Q (caD �j cOno oy oE cnN c a� o E-, o m M c� IL 'D0 (n LCL _ (y p ma) (n d° 0) (D 0L U 81 O V N inO-0 �>' .0 a) N S O O C `� "--' 4-1 x �= S O CDO `0 O Q i � O .V .0 > C V N d to O _O)d O O ° d U Q`- ° _O O a% p 0 m ,o NmU m E 3 a> >,� oU� �- o O QdI o to V y 0 U cNn 3 a� to v 0 _o 0OO o >, a0 `0 +-'CL O m_UCD ? - m om div = , c- a _0 CN V N(n c -0 N p co O O M c6 O oao m ) o m MoMn o) a(D M w Q (a) M2C/) a) NUIi a)HUd U U C U ai • • • • U L U • i 2 r► ►_ Q N `g;snBnV - 0011Iuau O:D AJOSInpV uoi;isinboV pue-1 : LtiLL0 6ZOZ }snGnV sei:pedoad OSI :} OMPeW oW a' � 9 E Q� O U Q O U) o 4- ry LU > 0 M C� .0 i ° o z Ln U W 0- QU 4J cn (1) ry U L (0 m C-) m U) Q� L- 0 L- Q 4J ap O U -0 o �, _ H Z (6 _� V) CY � O 0 LB c v, U) U E (o U Q J O L U) w . • . • Ln -o LO M Lf) a m i V m a `g;snBnV - 0011Iuau O:D AJOSInpV uoi;isinboV pue-1 : LtiLL0 6ZOZ }snGnV sei:pedOad OSI :} OMPeW ar E m c L + m o � � L {J � 3 v m ai ar rn m m L v O fl. N (AO L M W O- fl. m 0 O _ D 7 ai O- '0 _ = N 0 O' V s N O r6 L > > 42 k� 0> O aJ w O 0) L G I D fu M, ECr oa ar+� m c o GJ m � 4- s = c 0. c 0 O - —0 v v'A _,- "o OL 0 01> > 0, N u •� m c V1 c O c 4-0mV ai s F � M TVs 0 4A A = a) MGi = L Q O s _ 0 U- c M O c M v � ++ O U O a1 N _ y OJ O 0 aJ aJ to � 0 ~ 0 v m E Q N = fC s L O a N s m Mc u vM a aJ s v �+ d i .2 Qs o 'v, v 04-Ln 0 a� (a k *k O '�-+ M t a`ni 0 •V f6 f6 V Ol V f0 i J 2 Q i 4 2 v L O L U U L U Q. 0 -70 ar 0 L\ Q c 0 � L 0 c a, o L V s V L = N +' v s � U = = 0 L c 0 V t }J D �-+ to to .. I tA = W aJ ra t L = 0 0 N v N ra a Z ar O- v m tn 00 v 0 > L to V O 0 _ i 7 tA D > 1 4- 0 ro "6 W aJ Q) 0 ra = f0 > Ln O v _ r d Z >1 rn C w c c m rn c i 0 al O = O O y In L o m > O � � N c, v .0 N + o U 4n 01 ca Q V C41 N Q 4.0 O v 0 v p 0 ro O in N � sz > L }r _ O L O v tn a) V > ,� c -° OU Q� _0 _ a, = o v c 0, o s Q +� �^ c u�> . _ V cn =W� o 0 L � s } O O '� j N O .0 41 L v L L aJ V1 C a1 >� I ra L L 0 0= N 41 c> a� Q (D. W 0 v `° * v O_ V 0 *, � O L Vl v C a) 0' ar r s Ln v aj a1 -0 Q 4- ++ L •}' +S•+ > L ,� � ai c (A s 00 0 O r�o v -6 ro 0 0 m> c ra E 0 C O ra rCo a1 O W 0 +1 * (C Q i 0 +� N r 0 0 f6 V 0 0 'i C 0 ro V 'p1 0 V1 s v1 IL U LL d CU a _ U m . . . 0 U aJ `g;snBnV - 0011Iuau O:D AJOSInpV uoi;isinboV pue-1 : LtiLL0 6ZOZ }snGnV sei:pedoad OSI :} OMPeW `g }sn6nd - aa;;Iuauaoo AiOSInpbr uoi;isinbod pue- : LbLLO Q co N � a d t o � W d N L u ro Ln a; cn ro v L u i i J u LL ro 4l ro ry ro Q O E E v _0 O ro 0 V 0' c o ro ro O > L � t�z O ro V � O 0 a= +-j o � v +� u ro ro u 0 J Q El ui H V Z Z LiJ LU V Ln J Q H Z Ln I— LU LU WE 6ZOZ;sn6nbr sai:pedoad OSI :;uGwLloe;;d 00 o- Cl) a d U fC a `g;snBnV - 0011Iuau O:D AJOSInpV uoi;isinboV pue-1 : LtiLL0 6ZOZ }snGnV sei:pedoad OSI :} OMPeW c ea ao � � o � o � c� m C U N '�••� y U lu U O O CAo v y Q cz .�i > >~ O O it O O y i�r •i•r � e." � i�r U v y ° ° Q °`� o y ° a U cA C• U U � � � �` 0 'C U cd o Q•3 y ivi CO O UY O O P U U C� OR U r�i R et d :. w w F"w° to CSC a,p o = ° � w ^� U U a .?3 a. C o -0 2 U 00 C ��b o y .on o O y ¢ p. y 3 wcc a o `U° sue. W Q41 ca SrU" U w U aNi > c �. �bAce � �. �. x` o a3i U y y b ° -° y° 3 on r� Q� A •� o Ao w� ci N r.,J 'O .� M >:". id c> '� .r .d .d Lf1 k a Ocu L��] �a Y N U O O (6 O O f6 y.� p41. ci ►_ `6IsnBnV - aa;;Iu WO:D AJOSInpV uoi;isinboV pue-1 : LtiLLO IZOZ;sn6nV sai:padoad OSI :;uauayoejjv c O m C Q O L Q .E W 0 a m m a `g;snBnV - 0011Iuau O:D AJOSInpV uoi;isinboV pue-1 : LtiLLO E a I-d W a fn w o n 4J 0 o o ry U i _ O 4J m z Z Z O � U FY W ro U) a)CU N Q C6 L a..- _V . L Yo C) o U Q C)- rc3 rn d c - Q O 1pz U N 0 O C U) CU i .E Q U � Q U W � .� W w 6ZOZ }snGnV sei:pedoad OSI :4u0uay3e44d oW a� i t � 3 s V 0 `g;snBnV - 0011Iuau O:D AJOSInpV uoi;isinboV pue- : LtiL16) 6ZOZ }snGnV sei:pedoad OSI :4u0uay3e44d Q CD N c ea ao ca o lv b�A w CC C�i"y Y°r c � Fr � r•a y � v u 4-J Oci "� 7 it 27 a v O it o V c W y ej �" O > W m C Z CA el c Cd v O W y ee c c• C a ti O O p •^ o C � .r ci GJ c > .o o 55 a v o W �CL C v C > d V CU y y. T Z O +" C O 6" O a it :i CL �+ m � i.i . °y .� •� � W -a v C o O o y •o O U w O V 004; U"a � is ri= N Fj � +.+ P4 yam, �.+ � U N �+ C`• cd .N iti k Z O m O i cud a"i ok a W 4J 4J y„ O v w U vo N U P. x N ° H kwL Ll O t v t O L' O +J U U i. U >:L U U• N Lf) i31 a m m a a� z� 02 7' N �O T � LL X ' Z `6IsnBnV - aa;;Iu WO:D AJOSInpV uoi;isinboV pue-1 : LtiLLO IZOZ;sn6nV sai:padoad OSI :;uOwL4oejjv N t -r— ro t' O ry v > N o� Ul) 4-1 0 ti v S= N — a--+ ^, Q V/ O U w U') N U-) C- Ury O cn O U U �� _ L Q Ln Q o °J � Ea O Q }' o O U o 0Q C60 0 Ise C: Ln U — L IZ— Ln N U r v •� O LLJ w Cl. J � tCS moo= ° ayi V 0 � �Y piQ w t � o 2 m ) oLwu i O Li LJ Q] QI ik cu w •L ` azinm `g;snBnV - 0011Iuau O:D AJOSInpV uoi;isinboV pue-1 : LtiLLO Ln Q (1) ^ W ry w V z Z L r ry m Q U M � ti Z _ c6 Z -- L W > ' N ry uJ Z U U) o (3) can Q Q LO H L (n Cr)> Z ca (3) m W iJ L Q U J W ro • • 6ZOZ }snGnV sei:pedoad OSI :4u0uay3e44d oW a� i t � 3 U� lk�i �Qz V N `g;snBnV - 0011Iuau O:D AJOSInpV uoi;isinboV pue- : LtiL16) 6ZOZ }snGnV sei:pedoad OSI :4u0uay3e44d Q co N U � ea nn � � o U C3 o U cq y O CC C3 O U .r L: ! Li CL O ao y U 0 p u L •L: Z y F` e~C w to cu O Ti to Q a yLL Gw +U'' ♦••r ai 7 40 ai u O = u UCA �+ o W v O U 'a W o 0° N .O� Oi, U w 2 V C T U o o •C4 V �' °= y '� ,. acne y y �7 cc u chi aCi > t=ro s0--O p V 3 IF1 00 L o> o v i p t CU +� 4J y„ V] U 41 U V] N 0 U 'i +L+ O 'i+t y 'i i. •i U 'i C a m m a `g;snBnV - aa;;lu WO:D AaoslnpV uol;lslnboV pue-1 : LtiLLO IZOZ;snBnV sai:padoad :Dsl :;uauayoejjv ti a m m a `6IsnBnV - aa;;Iu WO:D AJOSInpV uoi;isinboV pue-1 : LtiLLO IZOZ;sn6nV sai:padoad OSI :;uewL4oejjv Q co N 00 le u� d r+ d Y V R d `6IsnBnV - aa;;Iu WO:D AJOSInpV uoi;isinboV pue-1 : LtiLLO IZOZ;sn6nV sai:padoad OSI :;uewL4oejjv Q co N n� W U ry 0 Q 0 m O �+ C� N E O cm.V a U .Q � Q ma 0) I _0 U > O E (a O U a_ X— Q U ^L f1 � 9 E m 4- o ^ 0 U > . O Q C.) o 5 .CL � M Q QU Q rg;snBnV - OO;;Iu WO:D AJOSInpV uoi;isinboV pue-1 : LtiLL0 6ZOZ }snGnV sei:pedOad OSI :} OMPeW nV W L� 0 ro E E �0 V O 00 Ln m r- V Ln m Lq m Ln N 00 N N N Ln m Ln O ,::I-Ln Lo 00 m m 1-1 I� N n Ol O m I- N O m N i--I O O N 0) � V � 0o0 m M r6 ra al L V a O m u Q O. ro ry LM N N C f6 L al L O C O v L 41 Q O Q v O d 1? L O O Y Y cu bn u u L v 0 Y mmm u u C u C u C u C d ro m m mmmm r0 to m m mevn ovD m v eC a eC a eC 0 cOa a0C a0C a O�o vO vO vv? LL=rL0 LLO N lA L � E Ov Ovv_ Ovv_ a)> v> v> v> a)L v vm m v?m > >L Z um E Q- =— In t in m v +� 2 O F- h Y "" U O i v O C L c v = u m Q Ln C r6 N c Q i o �, Ll 2 =_ o E > c U ra ro m J v �' +L+ 30 Y t N +' N v •V1 O v Q 02S v C U U O a) F- Y C o m .Q w a) E N u ? v O 2 II i O J O ` N = m YVI 2 O 0 '� E N cu L LU cn U v r0 v E L lzm o Lu °� O E c s E > fc6 ,� a Q) r0 O Y N v Y C U al v Y L) N L n v f6 O M O O ro •ra > c m Z r0 Ln 0 ra Ln 2 co Q 7 H co v co vui Lu Lu r6 Co 2 Q O I= O H O LO Cb a m m a `6IsnBnV - aa;;Iu WO:D AJOSInpV uoi;isinboV pue-1 : LtiLLO IZOZ;sn6nV sai:padoad OSI :;uewL4oejjv Q co N n , W (Q / L a) O W co CD . n N a) %1 cn i 0- U O .� N _ N Ucn L a) M O �/� VJ L fn O C NCO O 06 • O � -0 O� O co U .E cn u > = = a� m H . N M d N `6;snBnV - aa;;iu WOO tiosinpd uoi}isinboV pue-1 : L-PLLO 6ZOZ;sn6nV sa;epdn anJasaad :4uOwt43BRV 0 W H ; � Q e C d V sou � � C14 % IsnBnV-0 mmmoo AJo|np¥uommnb ¥pub :L L O �Z znnenV s mp nema ad:}emt43B n¥ #2 e} §\ \ ! �! !! % \ ! DWI n� W W LL W W U 0 E cz — ryca 0 � a Q a Q# LO `6;snBnV - aa;}iu WOO tiosinpd uoi}isinboV pue-1 : L-PLLO 6ZOZ;sn6nV sa;epdn anJasaad :4uOwt43BRV d N n� W V) ILL LL W U 0 E C co CL i�L\ L.L iL\ LO C) /^1W � d N `6;snBnV - aa;}iu WOO tiosinpd uoi}isinboV pue-1 : L-PLLO 6ZOZ;sn6nV sa;epdn anJasaad :4uOwt43BRV 23rd Street SW m m m MV W aq a6e an m G7 e� 7 4s pnl -10111 0 --- -- ------- Hai a ,�a M LO LO 6 a m .�c a `6;snBnV - 0814! WOO tiosinpd uoi}isinboV pue-1 : L-PLLO 6ZOZ;sn6nV sa;epdn anJasaad :4uOwt43BRV Y d N 0 co d r+ d Y V m d