The URL can be used to link to this page

Agenda 07/13/2021 Item #16A13 (2021 "RAISE" Grant Applications)07/13/2021 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Recommendation to provide after -the -fact approval for the submittal of the 2021 Rebuilding American Infrastructure with Sustainability and Equity (RAISE) Grant application, sponsored by the United States Department of Transportation, for the Golden Gate Parkway Complete Streets Project, in the amount of $31,249,450. OBJECTIVE: To receive after -the -fact approval from the Board of County Commissioners (Board) to submit a RAISE 2021 grant application to the United States Department of Transportation for the Golden Gate Parkway Complete Streets Project. CONSIDERATIONS: On April 13, 2021, Collier County was informed that the Notice of Funding Availability was announced by the United States Department of Transportation (USDOT) for the RAISE 2021 discretionary grant program. Previously known as the Better Utilizing Investments to Leverage Development (BUILD) and Transportation Investment Generating Economic Recovery (TIGER), Congress has dedicated nearly $8.9 billion for twelve rounds of National Infrastructure Investments to fund projects that have a significant local and regional impact. The Golden Gate Parkway Complete Streets (GGPCS) Project is consistent with the Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization's (MPO) adopted 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP). It also builds upon a strong foundation of transportation planning, including the 2021 Golden Gate Parkway Complete Streets Study funded by Collier County's Economic Development Zone; the changes in the Land Development Code to support redevelopment and renewal in the Golden Gate Parkway Overlay District; the 2017 Golden Gate City Walkable Community Study adopted by the MPO Board; the designation of Golden Gate Parkway Corridor as an Innovation Zone and as a Federal Opportunity Zone. The GGPCS Project will help improve access to reliable, safe, and affordable transportation for this community, improve infrastructure conditions, address public health and safety, promote regional connectivity, lower carbon dioxide emissions, and facilitate economic growth and competitiveness. This Complete Streets project will include: reduced widths for vehicle travel lanes along Golden Gate Parkway; wide shared -use paths offset from travel lanes; brighter, more energy -efficient lighting; purposeful landscaping including street trees; sidewalks on key corridors connecting residential streets; some necessary drainage improvements; bus pull -offs; and bus stop improvements, such as shelter replacements, benches, and Americans with Disabilities Act improvements. The project will also include coordination with public utilities to ensure utility infrastructure is available to support the future redevelopment opportunities. The GGPCS Project is the catalyst that will transform this area into a thriving, desirable community. This project supports the ideals of the RAISE grant by enhancing access to jobs, health services, shopping, and schools. This project will integrate the needs of all users of the corridor by including the needs of pedestrians, bicyclists, public transportation riders, motorists, older people, children, and people with disabilities. The project will improve resiliency and environmental sustainability by enhancing stormwater drainage for reduced flooding impacts and reducing the carbon dioxide emissions. The project will coordinate public utility infrastructure improvements necessary to support redevelopment as envisioned by the County Growth Management. As a result, property values will increase, and the project will revitalize Golden Gate City's economy. The grant requires a 20% local match of the total project costs. The maximum federal award is $25,000,000. Collier County is offering $6,250,000 towards a match if awarded and a grant amount of $24,999,450 for total project cost of $31,249,450. Packet Pg. 599 07/13/2021 All applicants are required to submit an application by July 12, 2021 and selected projects will be announced in the late fall. Federal obligation of the awarded funds must be no later than September 30, 2024. Transportation planning staff began the preliminary work of the RAISE Grant based on the Golden Gate Parkway Complete Street Study. Based on the large amount of work necessary to complete the RAISE grant application, a consultant was hired to complete the submittal. Collier County CMA #5330 authorizes the County Manager to approve the submittal of grant applications with subsequent Board of County Commissioners action at the next available Board meeting to ratify the approval as "after -the -fact." FISCAL IMPACT: The total project cost is expected to be $31,249,450. Should Collier County receive federal funding from USDOT for the proposed project, funding would be awarded in the amount of $24,999,450. There is a local match requirement of twenty percent (20%) in the amount of $6,250,000. Match funds are anticipated to be provided by a combination of gas tax, bond and ad valorem tax revenues. The Board will have the opportunity to accept or reject the funds if the grant application is approved. GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: This project is consistent with the County's Growth Management Plan and the MPO's Long Range Transportation Plan. If awarded this grant, the Growth Management Division will coordinate and partner with the Utilities Division to ensure that all required public utilities infrastructure necessary to support the economic and redevelopment initiatives identified in the Overlay and Land Development Code are included. LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: This item is approved for form and legality and requires a majority vote for Board action. -JAB RECOMMENDATION: To authorize the electronic submission of the 2021 RAISE Discretionary Grant Application, sponsored by the United States Department of Transportation. Prepared by: Lorraine Lantz, AICP, Principal Planner; Capital Project Planning, Impact Fees and Program Management ATTACHMENT(S) 1. FY 2021 RAISE grants NOFO (PDF) 2. [Linked] RAISE Grant Application - Golden Gate Parkway submittal package (PDF) 3. CM - Memo after the fact (PDF) Packet Pg. 600 16.A.13 07/13/2021 COLLIER COUNTY Board of County Commissioners Item Number: 16.A.13 Doe ID: 15746 Item Summary: Recommendation to provide after -the -fact approval of the submittal of the 2021 Rebuilding American Infrastructure with Sustainability and Equity (RAISE) Grant application, sponsored by the United States Department of Transportation, for the Golden Gate Parkway Complete Streets Project, in the amount of $31,249,450. Meeting Date: 07/13/2021 Prepared by: Title: Project Manager — Capital Project Planning, Impact Fees, and Program Management Name: Lorraine Lantz 05/19/2021 9:22 AM Submitted by: Title: Division Director - IF, CPP & PM — County Manager's Office Name: Amy Patterson 05/19/2021 9:22 AM Approved By: Review: Growth Management Department Lissett DeLaRosa Growth Management Department Capital Project Planning, Impact Fees, and Program Management Danette Kinaszczuk Growth Management Department Lisa Taylor Additional Reviewer Growth Management Operations Support Christopher Johnson Growth Management Department Lisa Abatemarco Additional Reviewer Growth Management Department Gene Shue Additional Reviewer County Attorney's Office Jennifer Belpedio Level 2 Attorney of Record Review Growth Management Department Trinity Scott Transportation Grants Valerie Fleming Level 2 Grants Review Growth Management Department Lorraine Lantz Growth Management Office of Management and Budget Debra Windsor Level 3 OMB Gatekeeper Review County Attorney's Office Jeffrey A. Klatzkow Level 3 County Attorney's Office Review Grants Therese Stanley Additional Reviewer Office of Management and Budget Susan Usher Additional Reviewer County Manager's Office Amy Patterson Level 4 County Manager Review Board of County Commissioners Geoffrey Willig Meeting Pending Completed 05/19/2021 11:09 AM Additional Reviewer Completed Completed 05/25/2021 8:09 AM Additional Reviewer Completed Completed 05/26/2021 9:21 AM Completed 05/26/2021 9:22 AM Completed 05/26/2021 4:24 PM Completed 06/04/2021 11:10 AM Completed 07/02/2021 9:48 AM Skipped 05/18/2021 12:25 PM Completed 07/02/2021 9:53 AM Completed 07/02/2021 11:20 AM Completed 07/02/2021 3:48 PM Completed 07/04/2021 1:07 PM Completed 07/04/2021 4:54 PM 07/13/2021 9:00 AM Packet Pg. 601 16.A.13.c co -per COHHty Office of Management & Budget TO: Mark Isackson, County Manager CC: Trinity Scott Director — Growth Management Division FROM: Therese Stanley Manager— OMB Grants Compliance DATE: July 1, 2021 Grant AppIic Reviewed and Approved by County Man , or designee: County pager (date After -the -Fact Approval by the BCC is required at the July 13, 2021 BCC meeting RE: County Manager review and approval to submit an electronic application to the Department of Transportation (DOT) Rebuilding American Infrastructure with Sustainability and Equity (RAISE) grant program to fund the Golden Gate Parkway Corridor project in the amount of $31,249,450 (ATF 21-012) The Growth Management Transportation Planning Division is applying for National Infrastructure Investment Grant funding through the Department of Transportation for the Rebuilding American Infrastructure with Sustainability and Equity (RAISE) grant program. The RAISE grant funding will help improve access to reliable, safe, and affordable transportation for the Golden Gate Community, support the enhancement of access to jobs, health services, shopping, schools, improve infrastructure conditions, address public health and safety, promote regional connectivity, lower carbon dioxide emissions, and facilitate economic growth and competitiveness. This project will also include coordination with public utilities to ensure utility infrastructure is available to support the future redevelopment opportunities. This grant funding would integrate needs of all users of the Golden Gate Parkway corridor. The total project cost and grant application request is in the amount of $31,249,450. The grant amount is $24,999,450 and requires a twenty percent (20%) local match of $6,250,000. A cash match of $6,250,000 is supported by a combination of gas tax, bond and ad valorem tax revenues. The Department of Transportation announced funding availability on April 13, 2021 with applications due no later than July 12, 2021. Due to demanding application process and short turnaround, we are asking for your approval to submit the application followed by an After -the - Fact approval by the Board of County Commissioners at the July 13, 2021 BCC meeting. Once you have reviewed the application, please sign in the box above and in the areas marked throughout the application and call me for pickup at 239-252-2959. Thank you, and please let me know if you have any questions regarding this request. a C9 w co a LO 3299 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 201 • Naples, Florida 34112-5746.239-252-8973 - FAX 239-252-8828 Packet Pg. 602 ~, Office of the County Manager Mark Isackson 3299 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 202 • Naples Florida 34112-5746 - (239) 252-8383 • FAX: (239) 252-4010 June 28, 2021 Honorable Pete Buttigieg United States Secretary of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590 Re: FY2021 RASIE Grant Application — Golden Gate Parkway Complete Streets Dear Secretary Buttigieg; This letter serves to certify that, in fulfillment of the application requirement, should the RAISE Grant he awarded to the Golden Gate Parkway Complete Streets Project, Collier County Board of County Commissioners will provide a local match in the amount of $6,250,000. Thank you for the opportunity to apply for RAISE funding. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me directly. t1sackson County Manager Office of the County Manager Mark Isackson 3299 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 202 • Naples Florida 34112-5746 • (239) 252-8383 - FAX: (239) 252-4010 June 28, 2021 Honorable Pete Buttigieg United States Secretary of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590 Re: FY2021 RASIE Grant Application — Golden Gate Parkway Complete Streets Dear Secretary Buttigieg: I am pleased to submit this grant application for 2021 RAISE Grant Program to fund design and construction activities related to the Golden Gate Parkway Complete Streets Project, The requested $24,999,450 will complete the funding package for this $31,249,450 project that when completed, will improve mobility and enhance opportunities for education and jobs in an area of persistent poverty in Collier County, The Golden Gate Complete Streets Project will provide pedestrian and bicycle infrastructure to an economically distressed community. The Golden Gate Parkway Complete Streets Project is designed to revitalize the Golden Gate City community by replacing deteriorated infrastructure as well as improving and increasing the size and location of sidewalks and lighting to create safer facilities for all users. This project improves safety in an area with a high number of pedestrian and bicycle crashes by converting narrow sidewalks to wide shared -use paths, replacing stops with bus shelters, improving lighting, landscaping and replacing the existing stormwater treatment system with one that is more resilient to climate events and improves water quality. This project will be the catalyst to revitalizing the community. Thank you for the opportunity to apply for RAISE funding. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me directly. County Manager Office of the County Manager Mark lsackson J�,1 i4N51� 3299 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 202 - Naples Florida 34112-5746 - (239) 252-8383 , FAX: (239) 252-4010 FY2021 RAISE DISCRETIONARY GRANT PROGRAM FEDERAL WAGE RATE CERTIFICATION Date: June 28, 2021 Project Name: Golden Gate Parkway Complete Streets — Revitalizing the Golden Gate City Community I hereby certify that Collier County will comply with the requirements of subchapter IV of chapter 31 of title 40, United States Code (Federal wage rate requirements), in the utilization of any funds granted to Collier County under the FY 2021 RAISE Discretionary Grant Program, as required by the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021. Park Isackson County Manager 1. TYPE OF SUBMISSION: Type of Submission: 2. TYPE OF APPLICATION: ❑ Pre@ p pi icati an *Application 0 ChangedfCorrected Application Type of Application: 1F 0 New Continuation Revision 3. DATE RECEIVED: Date Received: Completed by Grants.gov upon submission. 4. APPLICANT IDENTIFIER: Applicant Identifier: 5. FEDERAL IDENTIFIERS: a. Federal Entity Identifier: b. Federal Award Identifier: 6. DATE RECEIVED 6Y STATE: State Use Only: Date Received by State: 7. STATE APPLICATION IDENTIFIER: State Use Only: State Applicant Identifier: 8. APPLICANT INFORMATION: a. Legal Name: I). EmployerfTaxpayer Identification Number (EIWTIN): c.Organizational DUNS: FLORIDA Collier G,,nty Board of County Commissioners �F 59-6000558 aF 0769977900000 d. Address: Street7: 3200 Tarniami Tfail East 3E Street2: Suite 202 City: Naples dF County I Parish: FLORIDA State: FL: Florida dF Country: USA: UNITED STATES 9F ZIP I Postal Code: 34122-4902 aF e. Organizational Unit: Department Name: Transportation Planning Division Name: Growth Management Department f. Name and contact information of pe rson to he contacted on matters involving this application Prefix: v I First Name: I Lorraine 1 9F Middle Name: Last Name: Lantz iF suffix: v Title: Principal Planner Organizational Affiliation: Collier County Board of County Commissioners Telephone Number: 2392525779 aF Fax Number Email: Lorraine.Lantz@colliercountyfl.gov 1F 9. TYPE OF APPLICANT: Select Applicant Type t: B: County Govemment # Select Applicant Type 2: v Select Applicant Type 3: v 10. NAME OF FEDERAL AGENCY: Name of Federal Agency: DOT OSDBU 11. CATALOG OF FEDERAL DOMESTIC ASSISTANCE NUMBER: CFDA Number: 20.933 CFDA Title: National Infrastructure Investments 12. FUNDING OPPORTUNITY NUMBER: Funding Opportunity Number: DTOS59-21-RA-RAISE Title: FY 2021 National Infrastructure Investments 13. COMPETITION IDENTIFICATION NUMBER: Competition Identification Number: RAISE-FY21 Title: FY21 RAISE GRANTS 14. AREAS AFFECTED BY PROJECT Areas Affected by Project (Cities, Counties, States, etc.): ADD ATTACHMENT i 15. DESCRIPTIVE TITLE OF APPLICANTS PROJECT: Golden Gate Parkway Complete Streets - Revitalizing the Golden Gate City Community i Attach supporting documents as specified in agency instructions. ADD ATTACHMENTS 16. CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICTS: Congressional Districts Of: a. Applicant: h. ProgramlProject: Attach an additional list of ProgramlProject Congressional Districts if needed. 17. PROPOSED PROJECT DATES: Proposed Project: a. Start Date: 6. End Date: 18. ESTIMATED FUNDING ($): a. Federal: h. Applicant: c. State: d. Local: e. Other: f. Program Income: g. TOTAL: 25 aE 25 ADD ATTACHMENT D3101f2022 D41152D27 24.999.450.00 �F 6,250,000.00 �F D.00 iF 0.00 �! D.00 D.00 ]F 31;249;45D.OD 19. E.Q. 12372 REVIEW: Is Application Subject to Review By State Under Executive Order 12372 process? •.] a. This application was made available to the State under the Executive Order 12372 Process for review on: *i b. Program Is subject to E.0.12372 but has not been selected by State for review. (D c. Program is not covered by E.O. 12372. 20. FEDERAL DEBT DELINQUENCY: is the Applicant Delinquent On Any FaderaI Debt? 111 "Yes," provide explanation in attachment.) Yes iE . No 21. APPLICATION CERTIFICATION: By signing this application. I certify; l ] to the statements contained in the list of certifications' and (2) that the statements herein are true complete and accurate to the best of my knolvrledge I also provide the regulred assurances' and agree to comply with any resulting terms if I accept an award t am aware that any farse. fiditiaus or fraudulenl statements yr claims may subject me to ciminal. 6AI. yr administrative penalties Il1.S Code. Title 18 Section 1001 j 'The list of certifications and assurances. or an Internet site where you may obtain this list is contained in the announcement or agency specific instructions. 22. AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE: Prefix: First Nacre: Middle Name, Last Name: Suffix: Title: imiark iF 153Ck50ri � v Courtly Manager dF Phone Number: 2392528383 jF Fax Number: Emafl: Mark. isacksonQComerCotuttyF`L.gov 9k Signature of Authorized Rapresentativa: Completed by Grartts.gov upon submission. Date Signed: Completed by Grants.gov upon submission. 23. BURDEN STATEMENT- SF-424 Form (4040.0004) According to the Paperwork ReductlohAct of IM_ an agency may not conduct or sponsor. and a person is not required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a void OMB control number The valid OMB control number for this information collection Is 4040.0004 The time required to complete tiis informs lion collection is estimated to average 1 1 hOYis per response. including the time to review instructionssearch existing data resources. gather the data needed and complete and review the information collection If you have comments conceming the accuracy of the time eslimate(s) or suggestions for improving this torn. please write to: U S. Department of HeaMr 8 Human Services OSfOCI"R k 200 Independence Ave . S W.. Suite 537-H, Washington D.0 20201, Attention PRI Reports Clearance Officer Agency Total Responses Average Burden per response in Hours Tmal Burden flours DOC 17.327 30160 8.664 DOE 9,85o 60150 9.850 ED 10,235 60r60 10.235 EPA 9,098 4 36.3W HHS 11.690 4.386 51.275 SSA 2.000 20+60 667 USAID 400 15r60 100 USDA 253.663 60r60 253.563 001 22.012 271,60 10,010 DOD 206 6N60 206 DOL 2.621) 30160 1.310 OO,I 17.900 30r60 8.950 OHS 223 60160 223 391.445 total hours1357 124 total responses = 1 i hours per response FY 2021 RAISE Project Information Form - All Fields Required **DO NOT CHANGE FILE NAME, COPY/PASTE, OR PDF THIS DOCUMENT WHEN SUBMITTING TO AVOID PROCESSING ERRORS** ,Field Name Response Golden Gate Parkway Complete Streets - Instructions Enter a concise, descriptive title for the project. This Project Name Revitalizing the Golden Gate City Community should be the same title used in the Grants.gov SF-424 submission and the application narrative. The project includes approximately 2.2 miles of a Describe the project in plain English terms, using no more Complete Streets concept that incorporates than 100 words. For example, "The project will replace shared -use paths separated from vehicle traffic, the existing bridge over the W river on Interstate-X Project Description energy -efficient lighting, and landscaping. The between the cities of Y and Z" or "the RAISE Grant will project connects vacant commercial buildings with fund construction activities for streetcar service from essential services, municipal buildings, lighting, location X to location Y." Please do not describe the landscaping, and drainage improvements. projects benefits, background, or alignment with the selection criteria in this description field. Identify whether the project is located in a rural or urban area, using the drop -down menu. For RAISE 2021, a project is designated as urban if it is located within (or on Urban/Rural Urban the boundary of) a Census -designated urbanized area that had a population greater than 200,000 in the 2010 Census. If a project is located outside a Census - designated urbanized area with a population greater than 200,000, it is designated as a rural project. If you have identified the project as "urban," please select the associated 2010 Census -designated urbanized area UA from the drop -down. If you identified the project as Urbanized Area Bonita Springs, FL "rural" but it is located in an UA with a population under 200,000, please select the UA from the drop -down. If you have identified the project as "rural" and it is located outside an urbanized area, please select "Not located in an urbanized area" from the drop -down. Identify the project as capital or planning. The "capital" designation is for projects that requesting funding for the construction of surface transportation Capital or Planning Capital capital infastructure. The "planning" designation is for projects that are requesting funding primarily for planning, preparation, or design of eligible surface transportation capital Droiects. Enter the total amount of RAISE funds requested for this project in this application. [For capital projects, the Amount Requested $24,999,450 minimum urban entry is $5,000,000 and the minimum rural entry is $1,000,000. For planning projects, the minimum entry is $1. The maximum entry for both types is $25,000,000 ]. Identify the county where the project is located in using Project Location County FL - Collier County the drop -down. If the project is located in more than one county, please identify the county in which the majority of the project is located. Identify additional counities seperated by a comma. For instance, if the project additionaly runs through Additional Project Counties N/A Middlesex County and Suffolk County, please enter 'Middlesex County, Suffolk County' in the cell. 1of3 FY 2021 RAISE Project Information Form - All Fields Required' **DO NOT CHANGE FILE NAME, COPY/PASTE, OR PDF THIS DOCUMENT WHEN SUBMITTING TO AVOID PROCESSING ERRORS** Name Response,Field Identify the census tract number of the project. Please visit USDOT's RAISE web a e to review a full list of census tracts by state and county or refer to the Census Bureau's TIGER Web map to identifiy. For example, if the most central tract is Census Tract 93.30, please enter '93.30' Project Location Census Tract 104.11 into the cell. Do not be concerned if the last zero is missing from your response (e.g., 93.30 may display as 93.3). If the project is located in more than one census tract please identify the census tract in which the maiority of the project is located. Identify other census tracts in which the proiect is located, seperated by a comma. For example, if the project is located in Census Tract 93.31, Census Tract 93.32, and Census Tract 94.03, please enter'93.31, 93.32, Other Project Census Tracts 104.10, 104.19, 104.20 94.03' into the cell. Identify if the project is located in an area of persistent poverty based on the critieria outlined in the NOFO. The Project Located in an Area Yes - it is located in a census tract that meets the list of counties and census tracts that meet this definition of Persistent Poverty? definition can be found on USDOT's RAISE webpage. Identify the 5-digit zip code of the proiect location. If the project is located in more than one zip codes, please identify the zip code in which the majority of the project Project Location Zip Code 34116 is located. Identify the Primary and Secondary project type combination that most closely aligns with your project Project Type Road - Complete Streets from the choices in the drop -down menu. See the "Project Types" tab in this file for further information and project type definitions. Identify whether the project has previously received BUILD/TIGER funding, and if so, whether that funding was through a planning or capital grant, using the drop - Prior BUILD/TIGER Funds Awarded to Project? No down menu. Identifiy whether this project has previously been submitted for BUILD/TIGER funding and, if it is has, please identifiy the most recent competition it was Prior BUILD/TIGER Application? No submitted to for consideration. Please identifiy if this project has been submitted to other USDOT FY21 discretionary grant programs in USDOT FY21 Discretionary Application? No addition to RAISE. If it has been submitted to multiple programs (in addition to RAISE), please select 'Multiple' from the drop -down. Enter the total cost of the project. This should equal the Total Project Cost $31,249,450 sum of Total Federal Funding and Total Non -Federal Funding. This value may not be less than the amount requested. 2of3 FY 2021 RAISE Project Information Form - All Fields Required **DO NOT CHANGE FILE NAME, COPY/PASTE, OR PDF THIS DOCUMENT WHEN SUBMITTING TO AVOID PROCESSING ERRORS** ,Field Name Response Instructions Enter the amount of funds committed to the proiect from ALL Federal sources including the proposed RAISE amount. This value may not be less than the amount requested. Total Federal Funding $24,999,450 For RAISE projects designated as urban, Federal funding cannot exceed 80% of total project cost unless the project is a planning project located in an area of persistent poverty as defined in the RAISE NOFO. Enter the amount of funds committed to the project from non -Federal sources. For RAISE projects designated Total Non -Federal Funding $6,250,000 as urban, the total non -Federal funding amount must be greater than or equal to 20% of the project cost unless the project is a planning project located in an area of persistent poverty as defined in the RAISE NOFO. Select "Yes" from the drop -down menu if the applicant is Tribal Government? No a Federally recognized tribal government. If the applicant is not a Federally recognized tribal government, is the project located on tribal land? And if Tribal Benefits? N/A not, does it have direct tribal benefits? Answer using the drop -down menu. Does this project involve (a) private entity(ies) that will receive a direct and predictable financial benefit if the project is selected for award? This includes, but it not Private Corporation Involvement No limited to, private owners of infrastructure facilities being improved and private freight shippers or carriers directly benefitting from completion of the proposed project. If this proiect directly involves or benefits a specific Private Corporation private corporation, please list the corporation(s) Name(s) N/A separated by a comma. Is the project currently, or does this project anticipate TIFIA/RRIF? No applying for Transportation Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act (TIFIA) or Railroad Rehabilitation & Improvement Financing (RRIF) loans? Department Financing If your application is unsuccessful, would you like to be Program? Yes contacted about the Department's financing program? 3of3 FY 2021 RAISE Project Types Instructions: Identify the "Primary" and "Secondary" project types that most closely align to your project using the below project type definitions. Note that secondary project types align only to the designated primary project type listed above them. Primary Project Type Definitions The project primarily serves to improve motor vehicle infrastructure, including Road personal automobiles and commercial trucking projects. The project primarily serves to improve public transportation infrastructure, Transit including bus, bus rapid transit, streetcar, light rail, subway, and commuter rail projects. Can include fixed infrastructure or rolling stock. The project primarily serves to improve rail infrastructure, either intercity Rail passenger or freight. The project is at or near a seaport or inland waterway and primarily serves to Maritime improve maritime transportation through improved connections to the surface transportation system. The project is at or near an airport and primarily serves to improve the surface Aviation transportation infrastructure supporting aviation. The primary project element serves to improve bicycle and/or pedestrian Bicycle -Pedestrian infrastructure. Secondary Bridge The primary project element is the repair or replacement of a bridge, excluding Repair/Replacement road/rail grade separation projects. The primary project elements consist of Intelligent Transportation Systems —the ITS application of advanced information and communication technology to surface transportation. The primary project elements create additional capacity for automobiles and New Capacity trucks through the creation of new routes, the addition of lanes to preexisting routes, or other methods aimed at creating new capacity. Road/Rail Crossing The primary project elements create, improve, or expand a road or rail crossing. Repair/Rehabilitation The primary project elements consist of rehabilitating, repairing, or replacing preexisting road infrastructure. The primary project elements consist of modifying an existing corridor to make it Complete Streets safer and more welcoming to all users, including those walking, biking, driving automobiles, and riding public transportation. 1of3 FY 2021 RAISE Project Types Bus The primary project elements create, improve, or expand standard bus service. The primary project elements create, improve, or expand Bus Rapid Transit Bus Rapid Transit service. Commuter Rail The primary project elements create, improve, or expand commuter rail service. The primary project elements consist of Intelligent Transportation Systems —the ITS application of advanced information and communication technology to surface transportation. Light Rail The primary project elements create, improve, or expand light -rail rapid transit service. The primary project elements create, improve, or expand a transit multimodal Multimodal Center center which may serve to connect multiple transit modes. The primary project elements create, improve, or expand rail transit service which Streetcar operates primarily in mixed traffic. Subway The primary project elements create, improve or expand a heavy -rail high capacity rapid transit line. P" The primary project elements consist of Intelligent Transportation Systems —the ITS application of advanced information and communication technology to surface transportation. Repair/Rehabilitation The primary project elements consist of rehabilitating, repairing, or replacing preexisting rail infrastructure. Passenger Station The primary project elements consist of creating, improving or expanding a station Improvement or stop serving intercity passenger rail. The primary project elements consists of primarily addressing road/grade crossing Grade Crossing issues. Freight Intermodal The primary project elements create, improve, or expand the ability of freight to Connector move on or off the rail network. Includes all cargo types. The primary project elements improve the efficiency, safety, and security of truck Gate Improvements movements into and out of the port. 2of3 FY 2021 RAISE Project Types 7 . The primary project elements consist of Intelligent Transportation Systems —the ITS application of advanced information and communication technology to surface transportation. The primary project elements increase the cargo handling capacity of the port, New Capacity such as by expanding pier, wharf, or berthing areas. Rail Access The primary project elements include introducing or improving rail connections to the port, such as on -dock rail or adding rail intermodal capacity. Repair/Rehabilitation The primary project elements consist of rehabilitating, repairing, or replacing preexisting maritime infrastructure. The primary project elements improve the connections between an airport and Airport Connector the surface transportation system for passengers and/or freight. The primary project elements consist of modifying an existing corridor to make it Complete Streets safer and more welcoming to all users, including those walking, biking, driving automobiles, and riding public transportation. Road/Rail Crossing The primary project elements create, improve, or expand a bicycle and/or pedestrian road or rail crossing. Trail The primary project elements create, improve, or expand new infrastructure for pedestrians and cyclists separated from motorized traffic. New Capacity The primary project elements consist of adding additional capacity to preexisting bicycle -pedestrian infrastructure. 3of3 FY 2021 RAISE Urban Rural Designation Instructions: Identify whether your project is located in an urban or rural area based on the criteria outlined in the Notice of Funding Opportunity. Below includes a list of Census -designated Urbanized Areas by population. Urban and Rural R For FY 21, a project is designated as urban if it is located within (or on the Urban boundary of) a Census -designated urbanized area that had a population greater than 200,000 in the 2010 Census. Rural If a project is located outside a Census -designated urbanized area with a population greater than 200,000, it is designated as a rural project. Urbanized Areas with Populations Greater Than 200,000 Anchorage, AK 251,243 Birmingham, AL 749,495 Mobile, AL 326,183 Huntsville, AL 286,692 Montgomery, AL 263,907 Little Rock, AR 431,388 Phoenix --Mesa, AZ 3,629,114 Tucson, AZ 843,168 Los Angeles --Long Beach --Anaheim, CA 12,150,996 San Francisco --Oakland, CA 3,281,212 San Diego, CA 2,956,746 Riverside --San Bernardino, CA 1,932,666 Sacramento, CA 1,723,634 San Jose, CA 1,664,496 Fresno, CA 654,628 Concord, CA 615,968 Mission Viejo --Lake Forest --San Clemente, CA 583,681 Bakersfield, CA 523,994 Murrieta--Temecula--Menifee, CA 441,546 Stockton, CA 370,583 Oxnard, CA 367,260 Modesto, CA 358,172 Indio --Cathedral City, CA 345,580 Lancaster --Palmdale, CA 341,219 Victorville--Hesperia, CA 328,454 Santa Rosa, CA 308,231 Antioch, CA 2771634 Santa Clarita, CA 258,653 Visalia, CA 219,454 Thousand Oaks, CA 214,811 Denver --Aurora, CO 2,374,203 Colorado Springs, CO 559,409 1of12 FY 2021 RAISE Urban Rural Designation 14' Fort Collins, CO 264,465 Hartford, CT 924,859 New Haven, CT 562,839 Miami, FL 5,502,379 Tampa --St. Petersburg, FL 2,441,770 Orlando, FL 1,510,516 Jacksonville, FL 1,065,219 Sarasota --Bradenton, FL 643,260 Cape Coral, FL 530,290 Palm Bay --Melbourne, FL 452,791 Port St. Lucie, FL 376,047 Palm Coast --Daytona Beach --Port Orange, FL 349,064 Kissimmee, FL 314,071 Bonita Springs, FL 310,298 Lakeland, FL 262,596 Tallahassee, FL 240,223 Winter Haven, FL 201,289 Atlanta, GA 4,515,419 Savannah, GA 260,677 Urban Honolulu, HI 802,459 Des Moines, IA 450,070 Boise City, ID 349,684 Rockford, IL 296,863 Peoria, IL 266,921 Indianapolis, IN 1,487,483 Fort Wayne, IN 313,492 Wichita, KS 472,870 Lexington -Fayette, KY 290,263 New Orleans, LA 899,703 Baton Rouge, LA 594,309 Shreveport, LA 298,317 Lafayette, LA 252,720 Barnstable Town, MA 246,695 Baltimore, MD 2,203,663 Aberdeen --Bel Air South --Bel Air North, MD 213,751 Portland, ME 203,914 Detroit, MI 3,734,090 Grand Rapids, MI 569,935 Flint, MI 356,218 Lansing, MI 313,532 Ann Arbor, MI 306,022 Kalamazoo, MI 209,703 Springfield, MO 273,724 2of12 FY 2021 RAISE Urban Rural Designation 14' Jackson, MS 351,478 Gulfport, MS 208,948 Raleigh, NC 884,891 Winston-Salem, NC 391,024 Durham, NC 347,602 Greensboro, NC 311,810 Fayetteville, NC 310,282 Asheville, NC 280,648 Wilmington, NC 219,957 Concord, NC 214,881 Hickory, NC 212,195 Lincoln, NE 258,719 Trenton, NJ 296,668 Atlantic City, NJ 248,402 Albuquerque, NM 741,318 Las Vegas --Henderson, NV 1,886,011 Buffalo, NY 935,906 Rochester, NY 720,572 Albany --Schenectady, NY 594,962 Syracuse, NY 412,317 Cleveland, OH 1,780,673 Columbus, OH 1,368,035 Dayton, OH 724,091 Akron, OH 569,499 Canton, OH 279,245 Oklahoma City, OK 861,505 Tulsa, OK 655,479 Eugene, OR 247,421 Salem, OR 236,632 Pittsburgh, PA 1,733,853 Harrisburg, PA 444,474 Lancaster, PA 402,004 Scranton, PA 381,502 Reading, PA 266,254 York, PA 232,045 San Juan, PR 2,148,346 Aguadilla--Isabela--San Sebastian, PR 306,196 Columbia, SC 549,777 Charleston --North Charleston, SC 548,404 Greenville, SC 400,492 Nashville -Davidson, TN 969,587 Knoxville, TN 558,696 Dallas --Fort Worth --Arlington, TX 5,121,892 3of12 FY 2021 RAISE Urban Rural Designation Houston, TX 4,944,332 San Antonio, TX 1,758,210 Austin, TX 1,362,416 McAllen, TX 728,825 Denton --Lewisville, TX 366,174 Corpus Christi, TX 320,069 Conroe --The Woodlands, TX 239,938 Lubbock, TX 237,356 Laredo, TX 235,730 Killeen, TX 217,630 Brownsville, TX 217,585 Salt Lake City --West Valley City, UT 1,021,243 Ogden --Layton, UT 546,026 Provo--Orem, UT 482,819 Virginia Beach, VA 1,439,666 Richmond, VA 953,556 Roanoke, VA 210,111 Seattle, WA 3,059,393 Spokane, WA 387,847 Kennewick --Pasco, WA 210,975 Milwaukee, WI 1,376,476 Madison, WI 401,661 Appleton, WI 216,154 Green Bay, WI 206,520 Fayetteville--Springdale--Rogers, AR --MO 295,083 Bridgeport --Stamford, CT --NY 923,311 Norwich --New London, CT --RI 209,190 Washington, DC--VA--MD 4,586,770 Pensacola, FL --AL 340,067 Columbus, GA --AL 253,602 Augusta -Richmond County, GA --SC 386,787 Davenport, IA --IL 280,051 Chicago, IL --IN 8,608,208 Round Lake Beach--McHenry--Grayslake, IL --WI 290,373 Evansville, IN --KY 229,351 South Bend, IN --MI 278,165 Louisville/Jefferson County, KY --IN 972,546 Springfield, MA --CT 621,300 Worcester, MA --CT 486,514 Boston, MA--NH--RI 4,181,019 Minneapolis --St. Paul, MN --WI 2,650,890 St. Louis, MO --IL 2,150,706 Kansas City, MO --KS 1,519,417 4of12 FY 2021 RAISE Urban Rural Designation I...,, � Charlotte, NC --SC 1,249,442 Omaha, NE --IA 725,008 Nashua, NH --MA 226,400 Reno, NV --CA 392,141 Poughkeepsie --Newburgh, NY --NJ 423,566 New York --Newark, NY--NJ--CT 18,351,295 Cincinnati, OH--KY--IN 1,624,827 Toledo, OH --MI 507,643 Youngstown, OH --PA 387,550 Portland, OR --WA 1,849,898 Allentown, PA --NJ 664,651 Philadelphia, PA--NJ--DE--MD 5,441,567 Providence, RI --MA 1,190,956 Myrtle Beach--Socastee, SC --NC 215,304 Chattanooga, TN --GA 381,112 Memphis, TN--MS--AR 1,060,061 El Paso, TX --NM 803,086 Huntington, WV--KY--OH 2O2,637 UrbanizedUrbanized Areas with Populations Less Than 200,000 imd r Bureau) Fairbanks, AK 64,513 Tuscaloosa, AL 139,114 Anniston --Oxford, AL 79,796 Florence, AL 77,074 Auburn, AL 74,741 Decatur, AL 70,436 Dothan, AL 68,781 Gadsden, AL 64,172 Daphne--Fairhope, AL 57,383 Jonesboro, AR 65,419 Conway, AR 65,277 Hot Springs, AR 55,121 Pine Bluff, AR 53,495 Avondale --Goodyear, AZ 197,041 Prescott Valley --Prescott, AZ 84,744 Flagstaff, AZ 71,957 Lake Havasu City, AZ 53,427 Sierra Vista, AZ 52,745 Casa Grande, AZ 51,331 Santa Barbara, CA 195,861 Salinas, CA 184,809 5of12 FY 2021 RAISE Urban Rural Designation 14' .. ..F V V T 71171111111 M oil .. o Vallejo, CA 165,074 Santa Cruz, CA 163,703 Hemet, CA 163,379 Merced, CA 136,969 Fairfield, CA 133,683 Santa Maria, CA 130,447 Simi Valley, CA 125,206 Redding, CA 117,731 Yuba City, CA 116,719 Seaside --Monterey, CA 114,237 El Centro --Calexico, CA 107,672 Turlock, CA 99,904 Gilroy --Morgan Hill, CA 98,413 Chico, CA 98,176 Vacaville, CA 93,141 Hanford, CA 87,941 Tracy, CA 87,569 Napa, CA 83,913 Manteca, CA 83,578 Livermore, CA 81,624 Madera, CA 78,413 Watsonville, CA 73,534 Davis, CA 72,794 Camarillo, CA 71,772 Porterville, CA 70,272 Lodi, CA 68,738 El Paso de Robles (Paso Robles)--Atascadero, CA 65,088 Petaluma, CA 64,078 San Luis Obispo, CA 59,219 Woodland, CA 55,513 Delano, CA 54,372 Arroyo Grande --Grover Beach, CA 52,000 Lompoc, CA 51,509 Pueblo, CO 136,550 Grand Junction, CO 128,124 Greeley, CO 117,825 Boulder, CO 114,591 Longmont, CO 90,897 Lafayette--Louisville--Erie, CO 79,407 Waterbury, CT 194,535 Dover, DE 110,769 Fort Walton Beach--Navarre--Wright, FL 191,917 Gainesville, FL 187,781 6of12 FY 2021 RAISE Urban Rural Designation I',_ � .. ..F V V T 71711111 M oil .. o Deltona, FL 182,169 North Port --Port Charlotte, FL 169,541 Ocala, FL 156,909 Sebastian --Vero Beach South --Florida Ridge, FL 149,422 Spring Hill, FL 148,220 Panama City, FL 143,280 Leesburg--Eustis--Tavares, FL 131,337 Lady Lake --The Villages, FL 112,991 Homosassa Springs --Beverly Hills --Citrus Springs, FL 80,962 St. Augustine, FL 69,173 Zephyrhills, FL 66,609 Sebring --Avon Park, FL 61,625 Titusville, FL 54,386 Macon, GA 137,570 Warner Robins, GA 133,109 Gainesville, GA 130,846 Athens -Clarke County, GA 128,754 Albany, GA 95,779 Dalton, GA 85,239 Valdosta, GA 77,085 Rome, GA 60,851 Cartersville, GA 52,477 Hinesville, GA 51,456 Brunswick, GA 51,024 Kailua (Honolulu County) --Kaneohe, HI 113,682 Kahului, HI 55,934 Cedar Rapids, IA 177,844 Waterloo, IA 113,418 Iowa City, IA 106,621 Ames, IA 60,438 Nampa, ID 151,499 Coeur d'Alene, ID 98,378 Idaho Falls, ID 90,733 Pocatello, ID 69,809 Springfield, IL 161,316 Champaign, IL 145,361 Bloomington --Normal, IL 132,600 Decatur, IL 93,863 Kankakee, IL 81,926 DeKalb, IL 68,545 Carbondale, IL 67,821 Danville, IL 50,996 Lafayette, IN 147,725 7of12 FY 2021 RAISE Urban Rural Designation .. ..F V V T 71711111 M oil .. o Bloomington, IN 108,657 Terre Haute, IN 92,742 Muncie, IN 90,580 Anderson, IN 88,133 Kokomo, IN 62,182 Columbus, IN 54,933 Topeka, KS 150,003 Lawrence, KS 88,053 Manhattan, KS 54,622 Bowling Green, KY 78,306 Elizabethtown --Radcliff, KY 73,467 Owensboro, KY 70,543 Houma, LA 144,875 Lake Charles, LA 143,440 Monroe, LA 116,533 Slidell, LA 91,151 Mandeville --Covington, LA 88,925 Alexandria, LA 82,804 Hammond, LA 67,629 New Bedford, MA 149,443 Leominster --Fitchburg, MA 116,960 Pittsfield, MA 59,124 Frederick, MD 141,576 Waldorf, MD 109,010 Westminster--Eldersburg, MD 72,714 Lexington Park--California--Chesapeake Ranch Estates, MD 58,875 Bangor, ME 61,210 Lewiston, ME 59,397 Muskegon, MI 161,280 Saginaw, MI 126,265 South Lyon --Howell, MI 119,509 Holland, MI 99,941 Jackson, MI 90,057 Port Huron, MI 87,106 Battle Creek, MI 78,393 Bay City, MI 70,585 Benton Harbor --St. Joseph --Fair Plain, MI 61,022 Midland, MI 59,014 Monroe, MI 51,240 St. Cloud, MN 110,621 Rochester, MN 107,677 Mankato, MN 57,584 Columbia, MO 124,748 8of12 FY 2021 RAISE Urban Rural Designation .. ..F V V T 7M M oil .. Lee's Summit, MO 85,081 Joplin, MO 82,775 Jefferson City, MO 58,533 Hattiesburg, MS 80,358 Pascagoula, MS 50,428 Billings, MT 114,773 Missoula, MT 82,157 Great Falls, MT 65,207 High Point, NC 166,485 Burlington, NC 119,911 Greenville, NC 117,798 Jacksonville, NC 105,419 Rocky Mount, NC 68,243 Goldsboro, NC 61,054 New Bern, NC 50,503 Bismarck, ND 81,955 Grand Island, NE 50,440 Manchester, NH 158,377 Vineland, NJ 95,259 Twin Rive rs--Hightstown, NJ 64,037 Villas, NJ 51,291 Las Cruces, NM 128,600 Santa Fe, NM 89,284 Los Lunas, NM 63,758 Farmington, NM 53,049 Carson City, NV 58,079 Utica, NY 117,328 Elmira, NY 67,983 Glens Falls, NY 65,443 Saratoga Springs, NY 64,100 Middletown, NY 58,381 Watertown, NY 57,840 Kingston, NY 57,442 Ithaca, NY 53,661 Lorain --Elyria, OH 180,956 Middletown, OH 97,503 Springfield, OH 85,256 Newark, OH 76,068 Mansfield, OH 75,250 Lima, OH 72,852 Norman, OK 103,898 Lawton, OK 94,457 Medford, OR 154,081 9of12 FY 2021 RAISE Urban Rural Designation I...,, � .. M Bend, OR 83,794 Corvallis, OR 62,433 Albany, OR 56,997 Grants Pass, OR 50,520 Erie, PA 196,611 Pottstown, PA 107,682 State College, PA 87,454 Altoona, PA 79,930 Lebanon, PA 77,086 Johnstown, PA 69,014 Hanover, PA 66,301 Monessen--California, PA 66,086 Hazleton, PA 56,827 Williamsport, PA 56,142 Bloomsburg --Berwick, PA 53,618 Uniontown--Connellsville, PA 51,370 Chambersburg, PA 50,887 Ponce, PR 149,539 Arecibo, PR 139,171 San German --Cabo Rojo --Sabana Grande, PR 118,199 Mayaguez, PR 109,572 Yauco, PR 90,899 Fajardo, PR 85,225 Juana Diaz, PR 80,928 Guayama, PR 80,155 Florida--Imbery--Barceloneta, PR 71,747 Spartanburg, SC 180,786 Mauldin --Simpsonville, SC 120,577 Rock Hill, SC 104,996 Florence, SC 89,557 Anderson, SC 75,702 Sumter, SC 73,107 Hilton Head Island, SC 68,998 Sioux Falls, SD 156,777 Rapid City, SD 81,251 Murfreesboro, TN 133,228 Johnson City, TN 120,415 Jackson, TN 71,880 Cleveland, TN 66,777 Morristown, TN 59,036 Amarillo, TX 196,651 Waco, TX 172,378 College Station --Bryan, TX 171,345 10 of 12 FY 2021 RAISE Urban Rural Designation .. ..F V V T 7M M oil G . P McKinney, TX 170,030 Port Arthur, TX 153,150 Beaumont, TX 147,922 Harlingen, TX 135,663 Tyler, TX 130,247 Odessa, TX 126,405 Midland, TX 117,807 Abilene, TX 110,421 Texas City, TX 106,383 Wichita Falls, TX 99,437 Longview, TX 98,884 San Angelo, TX 92,984 Temple, TX 90,390 Lake Jackson --Angleton, TX 74,830 Victoria, TX 63,683 Sherman, TX 61,900 San Marcos, TX 52,826 St. George, UT 98,370 Logan, UT 94,983 Fredericksburg, VA 141,238 Lynchburg, VA 116,636 Charlottesville, VA 92,359 Blacksburg, VA 88,542 Williamsburg, VA 75,689 Winchester, VA 69,449 Harrisonburg, VA 66,784 Staunton --Waynesboro, VA 56,611 Burlington, VT 108,740 Bremerton, WA 198,979 Olympia --Lacey, WA 176,617 Marysville, WA 145,140 Yakima, WA 129,534 Bellingham, WA 114,473 Wenatchee, WA 67,227 Mount Vernon, WA 62,966 Racine, WI 133,700 Eau Claire, WI 102,852 Wausau, WI 74,632 Oshkosh, WI 74,495 Sheboygan, WI 71,313 Janesville, WI 69,658 West Bend, WI 68,444 Fond du Lac, WI 54,901 11 of 12 FY 2021 RAISE Urban Rural Designation 14' .. ..F V V T 7M M oil .. Charleston, WV 153,199 Morgantown, WV 70,350 Beckley, WV 64,022 Cheyenne, WY 73,588 Casper, WY 64,548 Fort Smith, AR --OK 122,947 Yuma, AZ --CA 135,267 Danbury, CT --NY 168,136 Dubuque, IA --IL 67,818 Sioux City, IA--NE--SD 106,494 Lewiston, ID --WA 51,924 Alton, IL --MO 83,890 Elkhart, IN --MI 143,592 Michigan City --La Porte, IN --MI 66,025 Salisbury, MD --DE 98,081 Hagerstown, MD--WV--PA 182,696 Cumberland, MD--WV--PA 51,899 Duluth, MN --WI 120,378 Cape Girardeau, MO --IL 52,900 St. Joseph, MO --KS 81,176 Gastonia, NC --SC 169,495 Fargo, ND --MN 176,676 Grand Forks, ND --MN 61,270 Portsmouth, NH --ME 88,200 Dover --Rochester, NH --ME 88,087 Binghamton, NY --PA 158,084 East Stroudsburg, PA --NJ 54,316 Clarksville, TN --KY 158,655 Kingsport, TN --VA 106,571 Bristol --Bristol, TN --VA 69,501 Texarkana --Texarkana, TX --AR 78,162 Longview, WA --OR 63,952 Walla Walla, WA --OR 55,805 Kenosha, WI --IL 124,064 Beloit, WI --IL 63,835 La Crosse, WI --MN 100,868 Wheeling, WV --OH 81,249 Parkersburg, WV --OH 67,229 Weirton --Steubenville, WV--OH--PA 70,889 12 of 12 3r i l�+ ..' � i ems■ _ �� b �,ti�� _ � �- „fie[-. �� ___ � ` _ y -,� � f, ``` ; ` • , ; n, _ Golden Gate Parkway Complete Streets ; ib Collier County 4' MA y r -7 L .. F June 2021 Executive Summary................................................................... I. Project Description............................................................................. Transportation Challenges and Solutions.......................................................................... .................. 4 ..................... 5 ExistingRoadway Conditions.........................................................................................................................5 ActiveTransportation........................................................................................................................................6 Safety.......................................................................................................................................................................6 TransportationSolutions.................................................................................................................................7 Project History and Area Investments.........................................................................................................................8 ProjectComponents........................................................................................................................................................10 Previously Completed Components.........................................................................................................1 1 II. Project Location...........................................................................................................................................................12 Geographical Project Description...............................................................................................................................12 Connections to Existing Transportation Infrastructure.....................................................................12 Census -Designated Urban Area..................................................................................................................................12 Areaof Persistent Poverty.............................................................................................................................................12 III. Grant Funds, Sources, and Use of Project Funds................................................................................................13 ProjectCosts.......................................................................................................................................................................13 Funding Amounts and Sources..................................................................................................................13 Non -Federal Funding Sources....................................................................................................................13 FederalFunding Sources..............................................................................................................................13 IV. Selection Criteria........................................................................................................................................................14 PrimarySelection Criteria..............................................................................................................................................14 Safety....................................................................................................................................................................14 Environmental Sustainability......................................................................................................................15 Qualityof Life....................................................................................................................................................18 Economic Competitiveness..........................................................................................................................21 Stateof Good Repair.......................................................................................................................................22 SecondarySelection Criteria........................................................................................................................................23 Partnership......................................................................................................................................................... 23 Innovation...........................................................................................................................................................23 V. Environmental Risk....................................................................................................................................................25 ProjectSchedule...............................................................................................................................................................25 RequiredApprovals.........................................................................................................................................................25 Environmental Permits and Reviews........................................................................................................25 Stateand Local Approvals............................................................................................................................27 Federal Transportation Requirements.....................................................................................................27 Assessment of Project Risks and Mitigation Strategies.....................................................................................28 VI. Benefit -Cost Analysis................................................................................................................................................29 Revitalizing the Golden Gate City Community 11 Yip ; f�4x Appendixes A Cost Estimate B Letters of Support C Benefit -Cost Analysis Acronyms and Abbreviations ADA Americans with Disabilities Act BCC Board of County Commissioners CAT Collier Area Transit CDC Centers for Disease Control and Prevention CE Categorical Exclusion EJ Environmental justice FDOT Florida Department of Transportation FHWA Federal Highway Administration GGAMP Golden Gate Area Master Plan GGPCS Golden Gate Parkway Complete Streets GGWWTP Golden Gate Wastewater Treatment Plant GHG greenhouse gas(es) ITS Intelligent Transportation System LOS Level of Service LRTP Long Range Transportation Plan MPO Metropolitan Planning Organization NEPA National Environmental Policy Act VMT vehicle miles traveled Cover Artwork Courtesy of Johnson Engineering Revitalizing the Golden Gate City Community 111 Golden Gate Parkway Complete Streets Revitalizing the Golden Gate City Community Project Sponsor: Collier County Board of County Commissioners Project Type: Urban RAISE Request: $24,999,450 Non -Federal Match: $6,250,000 Total Project Cost: $31,249,450 Benefit -Cost Ratio: 3.5 The Golden Gate Parkway Complete Streets (GGPCS) Project is a fundamental step in the Golden Gate City revitalization program. The project revitalizes the Golden Gate City com- munity by replacing deteriorated infrastruc- ture as well as improving and increasing the size and location of sidewalks and lighting to create a safer facility for non -motorized users. Above all, the GGPCS Project helps transform an economically distressed region into a family -oriented community —convenient, pleasant, and safe for motorists, pedestrians, and bicyclists. Cwir k \ city f Regional Donau Ecor b d Wa[W':4ro' .� se —mg. - ar SMayp t1u1. The project includes approximately 2.2 miles of a Complete Streets concept that incor- porates shared -use paths separated from vehicle traffic, energy -efficient lighting, and landscaping to offset both the heat island effect and carbon emissions. The project connects residential areas with essential services and commercial areas, while improving lighting, landscaping, and drainage. i Mid tiativhmxev M MII�MIraY li Aeh f Fbn� P dher i mL� 7Htio.al WddYk rge 9S a4 City of L HapW.- Fak1At4�kp 9travd _ � I Art.rre — ' &9 Cyp—. s'� .le PaAr NA—?F — CRY a: r u Egad Na0aul !so S xyarr o GYr7fafMmirs �� • �•w• __-- Wtir0- _.____—_—_—_ __. GGPCS Project location in southwestern Florida Revitalizing the Golden Gate City Community 11 aewr .. Primary Selection Criteria Safety This project improves safety in an area with a high number of pedestrian and bicycle crashes by converting narrow sidewalks to wide shared -use paths, replacing bus shelters, improving lighting, landscaping, and replace- ment of an aging drainage system. The GGPCS Project is estimated to provide 63 percent of the overall annual project benefit in reduced crashes and injuries related to bicyclists, pedestrians, and motor vehicles. What's more, the project is expected to deter aggressive driving. These safety improvements represent an estimated 30-year benefit of $60.2 million in terms of the cost saving of reduced injuries, fatalities, and property damage. The project is expected to improve safety for both bicyclists and pedestrians Environmental Sustainability The planned improvements support environ- mental sustainability by replacing the existing stormwater treatment system with one that is more resilient to climate events and improves water quality. The project also includes raising the roadway at least one or more feet for additional resiliency against flooding. The estimated resiliency benefit is $10.5 million over 30 years, including roadway repair costs. The resiliency benefit is likely higher as there is an expected benefit related to reduced travel times for evacuation and emergency service access after a flooding event. The addition of a modern stormwater treatment system for Golden Gate Parkway is expected to have numerous social and environmental benefits that are difficult to quantify. The GGPCS Project reduces vehicle miles traveled (VMT) by 49.3 million miles, resulting in significant emissions and water pollution benefit at a total value of $1.3 million over the life of the project. In addition, the project saves $2.1 million in reduced congestion costs. Quality of Life Once completed, the GGPCS Project will enhance connectivity and access to businesses, essential County services, and improve the quality of life for residents. The project will improve multimodal access to over 4,850 existing jobs, 10 schools, two parks, and government services. The 30-year healthcare benefits resulting from the GGPCS Project are estimated at over $8 million. Golden Gate Community Center Farmers Market is a popular weekly event that is a walkable destination for local residents The benefit of improved walkability and bicycle journey ambience is estimated at $4.4 million over 30 years resulting from increased property values and physically separating bicyclists from motor vehicles. Revitalizing the Golden Gate City Community 12 GOLDEN GATE CITY IS A PROUD AND VIBRANT COMMUNITY, BUT THEY NEED THE CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE THAT THE GGPCS PROJECT PROVIDES TO ACHIEVE A BETTER QUALITY OF LIFE FOR RESIDENTS OF ALL AGES. Economic Competitiveness At its core, the project improves access to existing services and employment as well as planned commercial, residential, and retail development, revitalizing a depressed urban area. The improved infrastructure will help increase local development that will create new jobs, increase tax revenues, and invigorate the Golden Gate City community. The project will also reduce personal vehicle operating costs by $5. S million over the life of the project, including savings on fuel, vehicle maintenance, and depreciation. State of Good Repair Replacing the aging stormwater treatment system, elevating the roadway, and making other infrastructure improvements results in a more resilient roadway and restores the area to a state of good repair. The projected 30-year VMT reduction for the project will result in reduced roadway maintenance costs valued at over $1.9 million. e*snN6RUtUW knxmnrm"A SEWW Gk& CMLE ETW Secondary Selection Criteria Partnership Key stakeholders include coordination with advisory boards, the Florida Department of Transportation, Collier Area Transit, and the Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization and its advisory committees. Innovation The southern half of Golden Gate City was federally designated as an Opportunity Zone and the adjacent properties surrounding project area were designated as an Innovation Zone (or Economic Development Zone) targeted as a Redevelopment and Renewal Area. Enhancing access to businesses will help promote renewal and redevelopment of vacant commercial areas Proposed typical section for Golden Gate Parkway showing expansive sidewalks, landscaped median and shoulder, and critical stormwater and utility corridor WNW "TM. F.EMC Revitalizing the Golden Gate City Community 13 The Golden Gate Parkway Complete Streets (GGPCS) Project embodies Collier County's vision for redeveloping Golden Gate City from an economically distressed region into a family -oriented community —convenient, pleasant, and safe for motorists, pedestrians, and cyclists, while maintaining strong con- nections to transit service. Located in an unincorporated area in Collier County, Florida, Golden Gate City mirrors many parts of Florida that simply need the right opportunity and infrastructure to become vibrant, shining examples of smart planning and design. To support and implement residential and commercial redevelopment and renewal initiatives, Collier County amended their Land Development Code to update the Golden Gate Area Master Plan (GGAMP) with a focus on fostering Golden Gate City as a dynamic, walkable community. The updated Master Plan includes an overlay district (and a County Innovation Zone designation) that incentivizes redevelopment along the Golden Gate Parkway corridor, incorporating mixed -use development and reduced storefront setbacks to promote and encourage walking and cycling. The Golden Gate Parkway corridor serves as the transportation backbone of Golden Gate City, and a majority of the commercial and Existing bus stop along Golden Gate Parkway government services are located along this corridor. Residents in the City are close to shopping, offices, parks, and schools along Golden Gate Parkway, making it easy to get around by walking, transit, or cycling. The GGPCS Project will help improve access to reliable, safe, and affordable transportation for this community; improve infrastructure conditions; address public health and safety; promote regional connectivity; lower carbon dioxide emissions; and facilitate economic growth and competitiveness. This Complete Streets project will include reduced widths for vehicle travel lanes along the corridor; wide shared -use paths offset from travel lanes; adding and upgrading brighter, more energy -efficient lighting; purposeful landscaping including street trees; sidewalks on key connecting residential streets; much -needed drainage improvements; and bus pull -off zones and bus stop improve- ments, such as shelter replacements, benches, and Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) improvements. The GGPCS Project is the catalyst that will transform this disadvantaged area into a thriving, desirable community. Collier County has invested in many programs and facilities for the residents of Golden Gate City, it now needs to invest in safe and sustainable ways for residents to access them. Rendering of potential catalytic development and infill site. (Courtesy of Dan Burden, BlueZones) Revitalizing the Golden Gate City Community 14 Fyn Many Collier County neighborhoods and major corridors were built before codes required pedestrian, bicycle, and transit infra- structure. While efforts were made to add multimodal options to Golden Gate City, many local residential streets still lack basic pede- strian and bicycle infrastructure. This project will add sidewalks to key residential streets for additional connectivity to Golden Gate Parkway. The project will also address flooding along Golden Gate Parkway, especially during hurricanes and strong thunderstorms, resulting from inadequate stormwater infrastructure, and includes replacing the antiquated drainage system to improve water quality and resiliency during flooding events. Golden Gate City is a proud and vibrant community Transportation Challenges and Solutions Existing Roadway Conditions Golden Gate Parkway is a County -maintained minor arterial that serves as an east -west connector between US 41 to Collier Boule- vard, and includes a major interchange with I-75 just west of Golden Gate City. The project is in a segment of Golden Gate Parkway that serves as a main thoroughfare from Santa Barbara Boulevard to Collier Boulevard, approximately 2.2 miles long. The corridor includes a landscaped median, four 12-foot-wide travel lanes (two lanes in each direction), and no bicycle facilities. While 1 https://safety.fhwa.dot.00v/ped bike/univcourse/pdf/swLessl3.pdf sidewalks are on each side of Golden Gate Parkway, little to no buffer exists in some sections between sidewalks and the vehicle travel lanes, and the sidewalks widths are the bare minimum (5 feet wide). Golden Gate City is a highly dense area with a population per square mile of 6,141 compared to the County average of 161 The Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Course on Bicycle and Pedestrian Transport- ation' notes that walking is a social activity, requiring a minimum sidewalk width of 5 feet for two people to walk together, and ideally 8 feet in areas near schools, parks, and shopping districts, to handle the pedestrian volume. Wider sidewalks are needed to safely accommodate large groups walking and biking to and from school Revitalizing the Golden Gate City Community 15 Aral FP,741,7771 c,►Aimlat a According to the County's 2020 Annual Update and Inventory Report, Golden Gate Parkway currently operates at a Level of Service (LOS) D and is expected to be deficient by 2026. Because Golden Gate City is located between the I-75 interchange and Collier Boulevard, this segment of Golden Gate Parkway receives substantial through traffic in addition to the community's vehicle traffic. The Collier County Board of County Commis- sioners (BCC) identified the segment of Golden Gate Parkway within Golden Gate City as constrained to four lanes because of the aesthetic and social impacts that widening would have on the community. Therefore, widening the road to reduce congestion and improve safety is not an acceptable alternative. Golden Gate Parkway includes an open drainage system of swales and canals that was originally constructed in the 1960s and is now nctionally obsolete.2 fuDuring Hurricane Irma, Golden Gate Parkway experienced substantial flooding and is known to experience flooding during heavy storm events. Further, storm - water treatment is limited to the Swale system and does not meet modern water quality treat- ment standards. Active Transportation Despite a lack of infrastructure, the rates of walking and biking in Golden Gate City are very high. Bike corrals at schools are full, sidewalks overflow at times, and crossing guards are busy. There are 10 schools within and near Golden Gate City, with one middle school less than 500 feet from Golden Gate Parkway. Census data show that 38 percent of households in Golden Gate City either do not own a car or own only one car —these com- munity members heavily depend on transit, 2 Golden Gate City Stormwater System Improvement Project, Collier County Growth Management Department, 2015. walking, and cycling as their primary modes of transportation. Nearby elementary school bike racks are full Collier Area Transit (CAT) serves the Golden Gate City area with four bus routes, three of which serve Golden Gate Parkway. Two of the bus stops along Golden Gate Parkway include some of the highest ridership in the area, with yearly boarding and alighting numbers ranging from 4,426 to 13,029. Seven of the 13 stops along the project consist of only a sign. During peak travel times, bus stops along Golden Gate Parkway block through traffic causing further congestion and delays. Existing bus blocking traffic along Golden Gate Parkway Safety Safety is a growing concern in the area. A number of bicycle and pedestrian crashes have occurred along the project corridor, with a rising trend in the past few years. With no Revitalizing the Golden Gate City Community 16 Fyn bicycle facilities along the corridor, inadequate sidewalk widths, inadequate buffer between pedestrians and vehicles, and traffic volumes increasing, bicycle and pedestrian crashes are expected to continue to increase. There have been a number of vehicle crashes along the corridor as well, with two fatalities in 2013. Review of an 8-year period of crash history indicates that over 50 percent of crashes resulted from aggressive driving. Transportation Solutions The National Complete Streets Coalition notes that a lack of sidewalks and safe places to bike are a primary reason people give when asked why they do not walk or bicycle more. A national poll found 47 percent of Americans over 50 years old said they could not cross main roads near their home safely. Almost 40 percent said their neighborhoods do not have adequate sidewalks, while another 55 percent reported no bike lanes or paths, and 48 percent reported no comfortable place to wait for the bus.' Wide shared -use paths will safely accommodate the larger volumes of pedestrians and cyclists The GGPCS Project proposes to make walking and biking more pleasant and safe along Golden Gate Parkway by incorporating a Complete Streets concept that integrates the needs of all users. Vehicle lane widths will be ' National Complete Streets Coalition, Complete Streets Change Travel Patterns Fact Sheet. reduced from 12 feet to 11 feet, 16-foot-wide landscaped buffers will be added adjacent to the outside travel lanes, and 10-foot-wide shared -use paths will be adjacent to the buffer areas. The buffer areas will house lighting specific to vehicle and pedestrian/bicyclist travel. The buffer areas will also provide an opportunity to replace the existing deficient drainage system with a closed system and increase the drainage capacity to help with flood management and water quality improve- ments in the area. This project also includes bus pull -off zones that create safer loading and unloading areas for CAT buses while also reducing inter- ruptions to vehicular traffic flow. Bus stops will be upgraded to be ADA compliant. Additional sidewalks along Hunter Boulevard will provide safer access to transit The National Complete Streets Coalition notes that by completing the streets for people who are walking, bicycling, and taking public transportation, more people are likely to leave their cars in the driveway. The Coalition also noted that residents in highly walkable neigh- borhoods made approximately twice the walking trips per week than those in poorly walkable neighborhoods.' Through the recent Golden Gate City Land Development Code changes along with this project, the County aspires to reduce vehicle miles traveled (VMT) ' National Complete Streets Coalition, Complete Streets Change Travel Patterns Fact Sheet Revitalizing the Golden Gate City Community 17 along Golden Gate Parkway to create a significant shift from personal vehicle use to active transportation and transit. Project History and Area Investments Golden Gate City was developed by the Gulf American Land Corporation in the 1960s. Small residential lots line the curvilinear roads with commercial and governmental services on major and minor arterials. The original development created a choppy layout that is mainly auto -centric and did not include pedestrian amenities like sidewalks and walking paths. In 1983, the County and the developer entered into a settlement agreement during which the County realized additional acreage and funds would be needed to provide public services, such as recreation, utilities, community services, and essential services. The agreement included the provision of 1,062 acres under County ownership. The first GGAMP was created in 1991 with land use designations that separate commercial and residential uses. In 2015, a restudy of the GGAMP of the existing 1960s stormwater drainage system. Much of the system is in fair to poor condition and is at the end of its useful life. The plan estimated costs at $15.6 million. --------___-e__--_--_- --n_m___________________- 9 0 P.25 U North ° -- ° u Golden Gate City S.I.m Miles ° Economic Development Zone p ° Golden Gate City Collier Blvd Roadway Walkability Community Study 2018 Widening Construction o ° Golden Gate City Funding - 2023 e Stormwater Master Plan 2010 ° Water Distribution Improvement y Projects Construction - 2022-2029 Golden Gate Parkway Wastewater Improvements/ � Overlay District/ Upgrades Following Facility Expansion qrr = .- Innovation Zone Adopted by BCC - 2019 i� . Golden Gate City o Transmission Water Main ° Project Construction - 2022;g Opportunity �® ° Zone e . ' Bridge Replacement Construction ?: ,s 2022 Golden Gate Acquired Golf Course ° Wastewater Treatment Property for Future ec ° Facility Expansion . Community Needs - 2019 Complete by 2024 reviewed policies and land use changes Numerous previous and planned projects in Golden Gate City that were preventing businesses from investing in Golden Gate City. The restudy indicated a community -wide desire for re- development in the existing commercial areas of Golden Gate City. The County responded with the following community investments: Pedestrian Bridge Investment. Pedestrian bridges in Golden Gate City were built in 2008, along Golden Gate Parkway and along 20th Place SW. Stormwater Investments. The Golden Gate City Stormwater System Inventory and Master Plan was prepared in 2010. The plan identifies and prioritizes replacement Golden Gate City Walkability Community Study. In 2017 the Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) initiated a study to prioritize sidewalk and pedestrian amenity projects that would promote and enhance Walk - ability, bicycling, transit, and social equity throughout the community. The study demonstrated a significant need for side- walk infrastructure in the City. Collier County has since constructed sidewalks along roadway segments, particularly around schools. However, sidewalks along Golden Gate Parkway between Tropicana Revitalizing the Golden Gate City Community 18 s►Aimtr �:. . Boulevard and Coronado Parkway are still needed. ■ Economic Development Zone. In 2018 the County designated all of Golden Gate City an Economic Development Zone to attract and retain business investments through financial incentives. Golden Gate Parkway Corridor Designation as an Innovation Zone/ Overlay District. In 2018 the County designated the Golden Gate Parkway corridor as an Innovation Zone. Property taxes within the boundary of the Innovation Zone help fund capital improvements such as lighting. In 2019 the BCC changed the Land Development Code with standards that support residential and commercial redevelopment and renewal initiatives along the corridor. The Golden Gate Parkway Overlay District was created as the location for the land use changes. Golden Gate City Designation as Federal Opportunity Zone. The County submitted Golden Gate City for federal designation as an Opportunity Zone in 2018. The Census Tract south of Golden Gate Parkway was designated as an Oppor- tunity Zone, which provides incentives for Mid 1960S Golden Gate City developed 1991 Golden Gate Area Master 1973 Golden Gate Plan (GGAMP) created City Golf Course 1996 Original Master Plan opens replaced by new GGAMP - EV- .< - 1) � investing in low-income urban and rural communities to attract and retain businesses and improve infrastructure. Water and Wastewater Utility Investments. In March 2018 Collier County acquired the Golden Gate Waste- water Treatment Plant (GGWWTP) to improve the reliability of service to Golden Gate City. Private wells and septic tanks are closely spaced and pose a risk of contamination to individual wells or water supply sources for the entire region. Before converting existing septic tank users to sewer (and in advance of the redevelop- ment of Golden Gate Parkway), the County is expanding and upgrading the GGWWTP, which is expected to be complete by 2024. For water supply upgrades, the first phase includes installation of a new water force main in Golden Gate City by late 2021. Golden Gate Golf Course Site Purchase. In 2019 Collier County purchased the former 167-acre Golden Gate Golf Course, which opened to the public in 1973. County plans include converting the golf course to a mixed -use development that could include: 120-bed State Veteran's 2010 Golden Gate City Stormwater System Inventory and Master Plan developed 2015 GGAMP restudy initiated 2017 Golden Gate City Walkability Community Study conducted 2018 Golden Gate Parkway Corridor designated as an Innovation Zane 2018 Census Tract south of Golden Gate Parkway designated as a Federal Opportunity Zone 2018 Golden Gate City designated as a County Economic development Zane 2018 County acquires Golden Gate Wastewater Treatment Plant 2019 County purchases Golden Gate Golf Course site - planning redevelopment begins 2019 Golden Gate Parkway Overlay District established - land development rode changed 1983 Collier 2001 GGAMP restudy initiated 2021 Golden Gate Parkway Complete Streets study complete County settles with Golden Gate City 2008 Pedestrian Bridge over 2021 Installation of Phase I water main transmission line complete Developer- canal along 20th Place SW constructed 2022 Golden Gate Parkway bridge replacement at Santa Barbara Canal complete 1,062 acres under County ownership 2023 Construction funding for Collier Boulevard widening available 2024 Complete expansion and upgrade of Golden Gate Cily Wastewater Treatment Plant Revitalizing the Golden Gate City Community 19 Nursing Home; a redesigned public golf _ course or alternatively public park, either h o= North of which would include multimodal pathways; essential service and overnment offices; affordable housin Sidewalk Ad g g ndd�Additionddition�nfl� for Essential Service Personnel; _ q commercial/retail uses along Collier Boulevard; and re ional stormwater GoQde" G e gy Parkway treatment. Complete Streets Pr°jec[ ■ Roadway Investment. Collier County has designated $38.2 million in 2023 to cn� widen the segment of Collier Boulevard adjacent to Golden Gate City. The roadway will be expanded from four to six lanes and include sidewalks and bicycle lanes. These investments demonstrate Collier County's commitment to keeping Golden Gate City in a state of good repair, enhancing its economic competitiveness, improving the community's quality of life, and increasing its environmental sustainability. Project Components The GGPCS Project includes the following proposed improvements: ■ Reduce the median width to 24 feet ■ Reduce lane widths from 12 to 11 feet Much -needed components of the GGPCS Project ■ Add 16-foot-wide landscape buffer to each outside travel lane ■ Add 10-foot-wide pathways to the outside of the landscape buffers ■ Install pedestrian- and vehicle -specific lighting within the landscape buffers ■ Install new curb -and -gutter drainage system for improved water quality ■ Raise roadway at least 1 foot for improved resiliency ■ Incorporate bus pull -off zones for safe loading/unloading of transit riders while minimizing traffic flow disruption ■ Upgrade and replace aging bus stop infrastructure to ADA standards ■ Include a 15-foot-wide utility corridor on both sides of the roadway ■ Add sidewalks on segments of Hunter Boulevard and 45th Street SW it , f Revitalizing the Golden Gate City Community 110 Poor infrastructure makes walking undesirable Previously Completed Components The aging bridge along Golden Gate Parkway over the Santa Barbara Canal was built in 1971 and needs to be replaced. The new structure will be designed in coordination with this project and will include 8-foot-wide shoulders and 12-foot-wide sidewalks on each side. Construction is expected to be complete by late 2022 well in advance of GGPCS Project begin date. W 7b- Bridge along Golden Gate Parkway over the Santa Barbara Canal to be replaced Completed in June 2021, the GGPCS Feasibility Study evaluated four potential alternatives (including the No Build Concept) along the project corridor. The study included an assessment existing conditions and future redevelopment potential. Three concepts were developed and compared against each other. Concept 1 was the recommended alternative based on constructability, design criteria, LOS, potential utility conflicts, and project costs and is now incorporated into the GGPCS project components. IV I . I .Ir IT11' 1S �rt 11. ZC S ^F ROATWSE u AMAPEd WESTSOIJNO MEOIAMr PATH L*W1hFGJTRAM9T TRAVEL LANES LANDSCAPE AREA ly PVUOFFZOME VTenYI FUTURE UT& TY CORR,OOR 73(r RA. W - MSTiNCIFUIRIRE UTUMES WATER. SEWER aw CABLE, ETC,] Ws- I I IV EASTOOLOO LAMD9 J E i MULT M BLfEFER TRAVEL µNE$ LILpRnvMMW PATH PULL CUFF MW IB I414 IflR j FUTURE UTIUTY COIOOR Concept 1 - Proposed typical section for Golden Gate Parkway showing expansive sidewalks, landscaped median and shoulder, and critical stormwater and utility corridor Revitalizing the Golden Gate City Community 111 Fyn Geographical Project Description Golden Gate City is located in western unincorporated Collier County, approximately 7 miles northeast of Naples, Florida, and approximately 1 mile east of I-75. Golden Gate City is a Census -Designated Place and encompasses 4 square miles. The City includes 76 miles of roadways, most of which are residential roads. iI Project �« Location ©La1M - 7 GGPCS Project in southwestern Florida Connections to Existing Transportation Infrastructure Golden Gate City is bordered by Collier Boulevard to the east, Santa Barbara Boule- vard to the west, Green Boulevard to the north, and the Golden Gate Canal to the south. Multi - modal accommodations throughout the City vary in including bike lanes, sidewalks, and the local mass transit system. The local mass transit (CAT) has four routes within the project area and includes 13 stops on both sides of the road directly along the project segment of Golden Gate Parkway, with two stops including bus shelter accommodations. Census -Designated Urban Area According to the 2010 Census Urban Area Reference Maps, the Project falls within the Bonita Springs, Florida Census -Designated Urban Area, code 08974. According to the 2018 American Community Survey 5-Year Census data, Golden Gate City has a popula- tion of 29,552. Area of Persistent Poverty Based on the 2018 American Community Survey 5-Year Census data, Golden Gate City consists of four Census tracts, three of which are classified as an Area of Persistent Poverty. Over half of the project area is within an Area of Persistent Poverty. Three of the four Census tracts within the City considered Areas of Persistent Poverty Despite the ongoing economic and racial hardships of much of Golden Gate City's population, the community is very young and growing. The median age is 36, much lower than the County's median age of 54. GOLDEN GATE CITY IS A PROUD AND VIBRANT COMMUNITY, BUT THEY NEED THE CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE THAT THE GGPCS PROJECT PROVIDES TO ACHIEVE A BETTER QUALITY OF LIFE FOR RESIDENTS OF ALL AGES. Revitalizing the Golden Gate City Community 112 Project Costs Funding Amounts and Sources The total cost of the project is estimated to be $31,249,450, 80 percent of which will be funded by the RAISE Grant, and the remaining 20 percent by local matching funds. This proposal requests $24,999,450 in RAISE funding to implement critical improvements that would increase safety, mobility, and quality of life for residents throughout Golden Gate City. A detailed cost estimate is presented in Appendix A. No expenses are anticipated between the time of award and obligation. Non -Federal Funding Sources Collier County will use Ad Valorem Taxes from its Local General Fund for the contribu- tion costs. The grant award will require accept- ance by the BCC. Upon acceptance, the matching funds will be incorporated into the County's budget under the specified fiscal years and sign and execute the Grant Agreement. ect Costs and Funding Sources Roadway Construction Additional Sidewalk (Network) Additional Stormwater Improvements' Federal Funding Sources RAISE funds are appropriated to each Project Element/Major Construction Activity as indicated on the following table. Additional sidewalk (network) refers to new sidewalk along Hunter Boulevard and 45th Street SW. Additional stormwater improvements refer to elements in addition to those identified in the Concept 1 cost estimate, detailed in Appendix A. There will be no use of other federal funding sources for the project. RAISE funds will be the only source of federal funding. �. - - Wrmunr� •1. T3strucIllre ParkwayQ ��,. I,Cvklntyar` awestl:at �'DCCIII»edcorridorlE.-JA eV eIonnemfen improvements,, ises fuse • vq� �n ommunitY Npos^,support �nxc.x�n 'il V 3.1 i l !! •.Kt�u,a a to 7b gateway,.,,-. c ,D= , rede►'elopment G $19,281,810 62% RAISE (Federal) $2,627,460 8% RAISE (Federal) $2,590,180 8% RAISE (Federal) Lighting $1,270,360 4% Collier County Professonal Services (Design, Permitting, CEn $4,979,640 16% Collier County Professional Services (NEPADocumentation) $500,000 2% RAISE Total Match County Funds (20%) $6,250,000 Total RAISE Reauested (Federal) $24,999.450 'Refers to stormwater treatment elements in addition to those identified in the Concept 1 cost estimate. Revitalizing the Golden Gate City Community 113 �! yll M Primary Selection Criteria Safety Florida is a deadly state for roadway users. Florida leads the nation in bicyclist deaths, is second in pedestrian deaths, and is third in motor vehicle deaths. In 2019 alone, Collier County experienced over 5,100 motor -vehicle - related collisions that resulted in 2,086 injuries and 52 fatalities; 130 crashes that involved pedestrians, including 6 pedestrian fatalities; and 122 crashes involving bicyclists, including 4 bicyclist fatalities.' From March 2013 to March 2021, the Golden Gate Parkway corridor experienced 1,729 reported vehicle crashes, resulting in 2 fatal- ities, 17 incapacitating injuries, 150 non - incapacitating injuries, and 340 possible injuries. During the same period, there were 39 crashes involving pedestrians or bicyclists along Golden Gate Parkway and the project sidewalks (Hunter Boulevard and 45th Street SW). The crashes resulted in 4 incapacitating and 17 non -incapacitating injuries. Community members heavily depend on transit, walking, and cycling as their primary modes of transportation During public outreach for the walkability study and the Complete Streets Feasibility Study, residents commented about the poor lighting for pedestrians and bicyclists, particularly for those who use transit and have to walk or bike to and from transit stops during early morning and late evening hours. Many ' https://www.fthsmv.aov/traffic-crash-reports/crash-dashboard/ residents commented that poor lighting is the biggest concern that prevents them from walking in the evenings. WHILE LIGHTING EXISTS ALONG GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY, IT IS SPORADIC AND IS NOT SPECIFIC FOR PEDESTRIANS. Section of sidewalk along Golden Gate Parkway with no curb and gutter or buffer to separate pedestrians from traffic This project will be designed with the objective of safety for all users. In addition to physically separating motor vehicles from pedestrians and cyclists (landscape buffer and curb and gutter), the project incorporates ADA- compliant bus stop improvements, lighting improvements, and bus pull -off zones to better improve safety. This project also proposes to add ADA-compliant sidewalks to residential streets that were found to have higher incidents of crashes, that were identified in the Golden Gate City Walkability Study as high priority sidewalks projects, and that connect to Golden Gate Parkway (Hunter Boulevard and 45th Street SW). The GGPCS Project will also deter motorists from speeding by reducing the travel lane widths. The National Complete Streets Coalition notes that speed reduction has a dramatic impact on pedestrian fatalities and Revitalizing the Golden Gate City Community 114 ^"mow.` :" F,`.- i that 80 percent of pedestrians struck by a car going 40 miles per hour (mph) will die; if the speed is reduced to 20 mph, the fatality rate drops to just 5 percent. Considering the speed limit on Golden Gate Parkway is 35 mph, reducing the urge for motorists to speed is a benefit to all road users. Implementation of the proposed project could have a profound impact on the corridor's collision rate. Using crash reduction factors from the FHWA's Crash Modification Factors Clearinghouse, the potential reduction in collision risk for each proposed treatment is substantial. The GGPCS Project is estimated to provide 63 percent of the overall annual project benefit in reduced crashes and injuries related to bicyclists, pedestrians, and motor vehicles. The project is expected to deter aggressive driving, helping to prevent over 120 crashes per year. These safety improvements represent an estimated 30-year benefit of over $60.2 million in terms of the cost saving of reduced injuries, fatalities, and property damage. Along the project corridor is a Collier County Sheriff's station and a fire rescue station. The addition of bus pull -off zones reduces delays along the corridor and improves response times for these emergency responders. Such estimated safety benefits not only save lives but by reducing the risk of collision among people walking, bicycling, and traveling to transit, they create a feedback loop that encourages additional transit and active transportation trips. s McDonald, N.C., Steiner, R.L., Lee, C., Smith, T. R., Zhu, X., Yang, Y. In Press. Impact of the Safe Routes to School Program on Walking and Bicycling. Journal of the American Planning Association. /I Jr/ - _< _ 0 Environmental Sustainability Transportation networks are the backbone of cities and communities. Ensuring their resili- ence has become a vital aspect of governing and managing an economically viable com- munity. Climate changes, rapid urbanization, and increased dependence on infrastructure are putting the built environment and its associ- ated communities under increasing pressure. This is particularly evident in urban areas when transportation systems face weather - related hazards, such as hurricanes. While this project is located in a more resilient area of Collier County (sea level rise impacts are not projected by 2060), the flood risk for this segment of Golden Gate Parkway is 2 percent for a category 2 hurricane and 82 percent for a category 3 hurricane. During and after Hurricane Irma (category 3), Golden Gate Parkway experienced substantial flooding. Golden Gate Parkway flooding after Hurricane Irma 2017 This project avoids adverse environmental impacts to air and water quality, wetlands, and endangered species, as the project will redevelop the existing infrastructure within an already cleared right-of-way. The project addresses climate change impacts by reducing Clean Air Act criteria pollutants and green- house gases (GHG) through a mode shift from personal vehicles to active transportation and transit. Further, the project will improve Revitalizing the Golden Gate City Community 115 stormwater management and water quality by redesigning an antiquated drainage system to meet current water quality standards. Increasing Resiliency and Energy Efficiency. Golden Gate Parkway is a desig- nated Collier County Evacuation Route. There are four emergency shelters in Golden Gate City, one of which is less than 500 feet from Golden Gate Parkway. Reconstructing the Golden Gate Parkway to a Complete Streets concept includes raising the roadway at least one or more feet, making the roadway and nearby structures more resilient to flooding. When roadways flood for a considerable amount of time, the impact to the roadway base can be substantial and require premature roadway resurfacing, restoration, and rehabilitation. Additionally, the use of the roadway during a flooding event is substantially reduced, limiting mobility in the area. The estimated resiliency benefit is $10.5 million over 30 years, including roadway repair costs. The resiliency benefit is likely higher as there is an expected benefit related to reduced travel times for evacuation and emergency service access after a flooding event. Because Florida's transportation sector is the second largest contributor of GHG emissions, the Florida Energy and Climate Plan provides strategies to secure clean, affordable energy while creating new opportunities for Florida's economy and addressing the growing crisis of climate change. The GGPCS Project aligns with this plan by replacing the existing street lighting with more efficient LED lighting. This project also includes replacement of all existing signals with infrastructure that meets the most current requirements for hurricane - force winds. ' https://www.walkscore.com/professional/ Y/ _ _ 2 Responsible Land Use and Transportation Design. Collier County's vision for the corridor and the community is to integrate land use and transportation to improve the experience for pedestrians and bicyclists and to limit auto -oriented land use. Combining the GGPCS Project with the County's updated Land Development Code for the area will create a mode shift from private automobile use to walk/bike/transit once the improve- ments are completed. Bicycles of varying sizes indicate multi - generational users The average high in Collier County is 83.8 degrees and the low is 64.7 degrees. The excessive heat and humidity discourages walking and outdoor activities. This project will help mitigate the potential for heat island effect impacts by planting shade trees and vegetation along the pedestrian infrastructure, improving the quality of the walking and biking experience. The 30-year benefit of improved walkability and bicycle journey ambience is estimated to be worth over $4.4 million. This benefit results from increased property values ($1,400 per property for an average increase in Walk Score over the Golden Gate City area of 2 points),' and by physically separating bicyclists and pedestrians from motor vehicles. Reduced Pollution. The reduction in vehic- ular trips will help decrease carbon emissions Revitalizing the Golden Gate City Community 116 .^. r ,W` nr� •. - � yam. and other noxious chemicals that contribute to climate change. Fewer car trips means less wear and tear on vehicles, and thus less risk of leaking fluids entering the water table. Trips made through walking, bicycling, and public transit, are more safely made rather than driving, which reduces air pollution overall. VMT savings will result in significant emis- sions benefits by preventing the emission of over 34.7 million pounds of carbon dioxide and other GHG emissions, for a total value of $1.3 million over the life of the project. In addition, a savings of over $2.1 million is realized for reduced congestion. The GGPCS Project will promote alternative modes of transit such as bicycling Stormwater treatment will be improved as a result of this project, which means cleaner, less polluted water resources. Because of the limited undeveloped space surrounding the project corridor, innovative approaches are required. Potential approaches include using the recently purchased golf course property for regional stormwater treatment, using a combination of dry and wet detention ponds where feasible, and implementing structures in the existing canals to control retention time and treatment. Such approaches are anticipated to improve the water quality in the canal 8 https://www.epa.00v/npdes/npdes-stormwater-program system and ultimately in the Gordon River, which is listed as impaired for total dissolved oxygen by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection. There is little guidance provided for quantifying the benefits related to stormwater management and improved water quality. However, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency notes that benefits of effective stormwater runoff management include protection of wetlands and aquatic ecosystems; improved quality of receiving waterbodies; conservation of water resources; protection of public health; and flood control.' The addition of a modern stormwater treatment system for Golden Gate Parkway is expected to have numerous social and environmental benefits that are difficult to quantify. Estimates for the total cost of reduced water pollution from roads and vehicles is $0.017 per automobile mile or over $429 thousand over the life of the project. Rain gardens and other green infrastructure will be incorporated into the landscaped buffers where feasible. These features provide an opportunity to clean and manage storm - water runoff while improving biodiversity using native plantings and providing a food source for insects and birds. Street trees and other appropriate vegetation within rain gardens will intercept stormwater before it runs off, provide shade for people and shelter for animals, and offset both the heat island effect and carbon emissions. Equitable Development. Equitable develop- ment draws on both environmental justice (EJ) and smart growth to ensure people of all incomes, races, and ethnicities participate in and benefit from decisions that shape where they live. The Collier MPO jurisdiction includes all of Collier County, and uses federal, state, and local funds to carry out a continuing, cooperative, and comprehensive Revitalizing the Golden Gate City Community 117 long-range planning process that establishes a Countywide vision for the transportation system. Collier MPO applies EJ screening tools when planning projects throughout the County, and the County seeks federal grants for projects where EJ populations exist. The GGPCS Project provides multimodal improvements to connect underserved neighborhoods to centers of employment and important destinations The County's vision for Golden Gate City incorporates equitable development and emphasizes that all residents should be protected from environmental hazards and enjoy access to environmental, health, economic, and social necessities such as clean air and water, adequate infrastructure, and job opportunities. Quality of Life -0 ---_--------------------------------- 0 0.25 O5 hi0rlh pig" Golden Gate i Elementary School Gallen Gate City boundary ' Grace Community School i Herbert Cambridge Elementary Golden Terrace 5t El zabeth Elementary School i Seton Catholic School ' St. John Neumann Catholic ` i High School GogGateMid i Golden Gate i High School ----------------- Lavern Gaynor Elementary Mike Davis Elementary School _12nEf= Providing safe access to/from the schools in the project area is vital The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) notes that although health is an important part of overall quality of life, jobs, housing, schools, and neighborhood also contribute. Improving the quality of life for disadvantaged communities like parts of Golden Gate City (Federal Opportunity Zone) can be more challenging because of social and economic barriers that are often in place. Census data reveal that 20 percent of Golden Gate City's population lives below the national poverty level, compared to just 12 percent for Collier County. Census data also show that though there are four persons per household on average, 38 percent of households in Golden Gate City either do not own a car or own only one car. Many residents walk and bike on a daily basis not always because they choose to, but often because it is their only mode of transportation. This indicates need to provide safe access to alternative transportation options, to provide equity to those who do not drive or have a personal vehicle, and to provide equity for access to employment, shopping, education, and social activities. Improved Connectivity and Access to Jobs and Services. The GGPCS Project will improve multimodal access to over 4,850 existing jobs, 10 schools, two parks, and government services. Every weekend, all year round, the Golden Gate Community Farmers I V Revitalizing the Golden Gate City Community 118 XE . :. , �,. � .; ,� ';!'� Market is hosted at the Golden Gate Com- munity Center, which is located along the project corridor, where locally grown food, prepared foods, plants, and clothing are sold. Improved multimodal access provides a comfortable journey for children to play in parks and playgrounds, and not driveways This project is expected to improve the street- scape and attract businesses to the Golden Gate Parkway corridor, broadening the appeal of events like the Farmers Market to improve sales and boost the local economy. Racial Equity and Transportation Choices. The Golden Gate Senior Center, off Golden Gate Parkway, has 1,460 diverse residents who are primarily female, largely Spanish-speaking and often, live in poverty.' Over 83 percent of the population in Golden Gate City is minority and over 18 percent do not speak English well. Almost 14 percent of the population identifies as black and 43 percent of the population identifies as non -white. Even in communities served by public trans- portation, incomplete streets may discourage residents from fully using the service.'° Low- income communities and communities of color often receive less benefit from transportation system improvements because of inequitable planning, and therefore have less access to certain destinations and amenities. The GGPCS Project will provide safe and accessible routes in the minority community of ' https://collierseniorresources.org/golden-gate-senior-center/ I/Y/ >>4 _ 2 Golden Gate City, and help improve health, encourage the use of public transit, and remove barriers to opportunity caused by a lack of access to transportation. Complete Streets also improve the quality of life and the health of aging and disabled residents by improving the safety of pedestrian travel through the provision of ADA- compliant facilities and features. Of the total 13 bus stops along the project, 7 stops consist of only a sign, which is inaccessible and uncomfortable for users. Research shows that when a bus stop offers no amenities, people perceive their wait time as twice as long or longer than their actual wait time. The quality of life for residents will be improved through the replacement of two shelters, installation of three benches at existing bus stops, and upgrade of all bus stops to ADA compliance. ADA compliance, when integrated into the overall design of a Complete Streets network, allows easier access to local businesses and services for those with mobility issues, making trips easier and more enjoyable. ADA- compliant facilities not only help older adults and those in wheelchairs, but also families with young children in strollers, older children learning to ride a bike, and those experiencing temporary mobility issues related to injury or disease. ADA improvements will integrate the needs of all users 10 Smart Growth America Complete Streets Make for a Good Ride https://smartgrowthamerica.org/resources/public- tra nsp ortation-benefits-of-comp lete-streets/ Revitalizing the Golden Gate City Community 119 # Approximately 8 percent of the City's population is under 5 years old, which is almost double the County's population for the same age group. Over 85 percent of students currently walk or bike to school each day. Over 9 percent of the population is 65 or older, and 7 percent of the population has a disability. By creating a pedestrian network that allows those with disabilities and older populations to access local services and amenities by walking, residents will be able to age in place and save on the costs of assisted living and the burden of moving to a new community. A UK study found that when a large proportion of working older people rely on transit, accessibility improvements allow them to contribute an additional 10 percent to the national economy." About 8 percent of Golden Gate City's population is under 5 years old Health Benefits for Residents. The GGPCS Project will provide a Complete Streets concept that not only is safer for pedestrians and bicyclists, but feels safer to the user. By removing the safety risks associated with walking/biking along streets that lack either bike lanes, sidewalks, buffers, or curb and gutter, it improves the health of residents and workers. Complete Streets can help reduce traffic -related deaths, which are the leading cause of unintentional injury deaths, and the fourth leading cause of death in Collier County. " https://www.itf-oecd.oro/sites/default/files/docs/economic- be nefits-i m proved -accessi bi lity-transport-syste m s.pdf According to the 2016 Collier County Health Assessment, overweight and obesity levels account for 17 percent of all deaths annually in the County or about 1 out of every 6 deaths. A goal of the Golden Gate Parkway Overlay District is to promote and encourage walking and cycling by making it more comfortable and pleasant. Through improved bicycle and pedestrian facilities, this project will provide an opportunity for the community to interact with nature and neighbors, de -stress, exercise, and socialize. Social benefits of walking and biking include increased community involvement, improved image of one's community, increased sense of social integration, and decreased isolation and loneliness. Health benefits include lower stress, decreased body mass, faster hospital recoveries, and improved mental health, all of which lower costs for public and private healthcare and community services. The Golden Gate Community Center is heavily used for COVID-19 testing and vaccinations The CDC estimates that 52 percent of Floridians are not physically active (less than 150 minutes of activity per week), which has an estimated annual health cost of $576 per person. This project provides a safe, com- fortable opportunity for area residents and visitors to increase their physical activity levels for exercise and while going about their daily activities. The healthcare benefits resulting from the GGPCS Project are estimated at ,$8 million over 30 years. Revitalizing the Golden Gate City Community 120 Community gardens give residents the chance to interact with nature and neighbors, de -stress, exercise, and socialize Economic Competitiveness Census data indicate that the top industries that employ workers from Golden Gate City are in construction (23 percent), arts, entertainment, recreation, accommodation, food services (15 percent), and retail trade (13 percent). These jobs often experience employment fluc- tuations. Census data further revealed that over 50 percent of the employable population work- ed less than full-time in the past 12 months. The GGAMP promotes the expansion of private economic development by establishing the Golden Gate City Economic Development Zone Trust Fund to attract and retain qualified targeted industry businesses and foster eco- nomic development for the redevelopment and renewal of the commercial district along Golden Gate Parkway. The project is expected expand economic opportunity to the residents of Golden Gate City, and thus more local residents can be employed locally rather than experience the burden of long distance commuting for work. Access to five local food pantries in Golden Gate City, most of which are available along Golden Gate Parkway, will be improved. Money saved on transportation can be used for 12https://www.healthy.arkansas.gov/images/uploads/pdf/Complete Streets.pdf other needs, including education, healthcare, and other savings, thus creating a cycle of benefits resulting in an improved overall quality of life and economic competitiveness. Many residents benefit from the Golden Gate Senior Center Food Pantry (source Naples Daily News, May 25, 2020) A study from Portland State University suggests that access to transit is a significant factor in determining labor force participation and therefore a factor in escaping poverty. And in a study of employers outside of Pittsburgh, 30 percent responded that transportation was the number one barrier to hiring and retaining qualified workers.12 Providing safe infra- structure for residents to get to work (walk, bike, transit) can boost the economy and increase consumer spending. Buffered landscaping and shaded pathways are proposed to provide safe, comfortable access for bicyclists and pedestrians A study by Smart Growth America on Complete Streets projects found that employ - Revitalizing the Golden Gate City Community 121 ment levels rose after Complete Streets were installed, and in some cases, significantly so. Studies conducted in urban and rural areas all showed strong job growth or increased spending at local businesses following the construction of a Complete Streets project. Golden Gate City will see the benefit of new businesses and new jobs created to support them, revitalizing the vacant commercial areas and improving the community's overall well- being. It will also see the increase in employ- ment at existing businesses in the community because of the infrastructure improvements as suggested by Smart Growth America that Complete Streets are more desirable for businesses. Golden Gate City already has a sense of community; this project will help others recognize it as great place to work and raise a family. Cost Savings. The projected mode shift along with reduced VMT and congestion will increase the efficiency of movement along the project area and the surrounding roadway network. According to the Benefit -Cost Analysis, the project also reduces vehicle operating costs by almost $5.5 million over the life of the project, including savings on fuel, vehicle maintenance, and depreciation. This reduction in household travel costs is parti- cularly valuable given that the average household income of the study area is well below the statewide average, with transporta- tion costs making up a higher proportion of household income. State of Good Repair Maintaining a state of good repair for the improvements is essential for maximum life - cycle benefit. The GGPCS Project will help maintain a state of good repair by encouraging a mode shift from motorized vehicles to walking, biking, and transit, resulting in a reduction of roadway maintenance costs. In addition, improvements to bicycle and pedestrian networks will reduce the need for future roadway capacity improvements. The GGPCS Project is projected to reduce VMT by 49.3 million miles, resulting in an increase of 11.9 million bicycling trips, 29.7 million walking trips, and 3 million bus trips. This project also proposes to install new bus shelters, lighting, and traffic and pedestrian signals that will be constructed to withstand hurricane -force winds. These improvements will reduce the risk of damage and result in reduced maintenance and replacement costs for these facilities over their lifespan. The existing sidewalks are nonuniform in width, setback, and material (asphalt, concrete, pavers), and do not incorporate best practices around utility placement. .`_ _ Drainage inlet within the sidewalk make walking and biking difficult Revitalizing the Golden Gate City Community 122 The state of good repair of the roads, side- walks, and bicycle facilities will be improved through the new stormwater treatment system, which will minimize flooding and thus potential damage from water saturation of the road base, as well as improve water quality. In addition, raising the road one or more feet will improve flooding resiliency. The projected 30-year VMT reduction for the project will result in reduced roadway maintenance costs valued at $1.9 million. Secondary Selection Criteria Partnership This Project demonstrates strong collaboration among a broad range of stakeholders including state, local, regional, public, and private partners. This is the product of a robust, inclusive long-term planning process. The following entities are providing and will continue to provide project planning and support: ■ Collier County (applicant), Transportation Planning & Engineering Sections ■ Golden Gate City Economic Development Zone Advisory Board ■ Golden Gate Community Center Advisory Board ■ Golden Gate Beautification Advisory Committee ■ Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT), District One ■ Florida Department of State ■ Collier Area Transit ■ Collier MPO and its advisory committees Collier County has received letters of support for the Project from a variety of stakeholders; these letters are provided in Appendix B. 13 https://www.coL[ieredo.orci/opportunity-zones Innovation The federal Tax Cut and Jobs Act of 201713 only designated five Census tracts in Collier County as Opportunity Zones, one of which was in Golden Gate City. The southern half of Golden Gate City was federally designated as an Opportunity Zone and the adjacent properties surrounding project area were designated as an Innovation Zone (or Economic Development Zone) targeted for Redevelopment and Renewal, per Ordinance # 2018-056. State of Good Repair Innovation. The project will use innovative technology and practices in asset management, and long-term operations and maintenance to enhance the operational performance of the Collier County transportation system. Collier County docu- ments its transportation facilities in an asset management database that is used to record assets, budget and schedule facility mainte- nance, and track lifecycle costs for current and future County projects. The GGPCS Project will help enhance the operational performance of the Collier County transportation system Quality of Life Innovation. The existing transit system incorporates innovative tech- nology by providing users a mobile application (or available online) that provides real-time tracking of buses. It can also provide alerts that let riders know how far away (in minutes) the bus is from the stop. The program allows users to see where the bus is along the route at Revitalizing the Golden Gate City Community 123 any moment in time. This innovative tracking tool combined with the Complete Streets project promotes confidence in riders and makes the system more predictable and reliable. Signal Detection Innovation. Three Collier MPO Committees (Congestion Management Committee, Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee, and Technical Advisory Committee) assist in the development of the Collier County transportation network and make recommendations on using innovative Intelligent Transportation System (ITS) architecture. This project will include the replacement of traffic and pedestrian signals with the latest ITS detection systems, making Collier's transportation system `smarter' and easier to use. Approximately 86 percent of school children in Golden Gate City walk or bike to school each day Innovative Project Delivery The County will incorporate technological innovations to expedite project delivery and ensure the project is completed well in advance of the Federal deadline. FDOT has National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) designation authority, which provides efficiencies when delivering the NEPA document prior to design and construction. Using innovative project management soft- ware, the County will track the project and use automated internal controls to improve efficiency of project development and delivery f/ _ _ .% 19 to ensure the project stays on track, in compliance, and within budget. Drone technology will be used to assist with construction oversight and project management The County will use drone technology to assist with construction oversight and project management. Replacement of the existing bridge along Golden Gate Parkway over the Santa Barbara Canal will be complete (late 2022) prior to the construction of this project, which will reduce the design, permitting, and construction schedules and increase the efficiency of project delivery. Innovative Financing The Feasibility Study was funded using an innovative financing method, the Golden Gate Economic Development Zone Trust Fund. This fund was established for the Golden Gate Parkway Overlay District to foster economic development, with the oversight from an established Advisory Board. This method of innovative financing was established for the redevelopment and renewal of the commercial district along Golden Gate Parkway. With GGPCS Project launching the Golden Gate City revitalization program, the established policies and procedures will then foster the development for the residents' vision for this community. The County's matching funds for the GGPCS Project will be funded through Ad Valorem Taxes from the County General Fund. Revitalizing the Golden Gate City Community 124 Project Schedule The project schedule begins at project award (anticipated November 2021) and continues until the project is complete in spring 2027. The obligation of funds will begin immedi- ately upon receiving notice of award and be completed well in advance of the early statutory deadline of June 30, 2024. After the obligation of funds, NEPA documentation will proceed as a Categorical Exclusion (CE). If necessary, right-of-way acquisition will occur during design and permitting so that construction can begin in 2025. Expenditure of grant funds will be completed expeditiously and well in advance of the September 30, 2029, deadline. Required Approvals Environmental Permits and Reviews NEPA Status The entirety of the Project will be constructed using most of the existing agency right-of- way. Minimal, if any, right-of-way is anticipated for the project. Because the project corridor is fully developed, impacts to environmentally Project Schedule sensitive lands or endangered species habitat is not anticipated. As such, according to NEPA regulations, the project merits a CE status, which will be completed in the initial year before project design, thus no delay associated with NEPA is expected. No legislative approval is necessary, and the maintaining agencies are responsible for implementation. Collier County will coordinate with the Collier MPO and FDOT to amend the MPO Transportation Improvement Program and the FDOT STIP upon notification of the RAISE award. Required Permit and Agency Reviews No significant impacts are anticipated to wetlands, critical habitat or endangered species. A South Florida Water Management District Environmental Resource Permit is expected, as well as a Florida Department of Environmental Protection permit through the State 404 Program. Further, the project will not impact any social resources in Golden Gate City, and is expected to improve the community's access and mobility to these resources. No historical or archaeological resources are anticipated to be affected since the project corridor is fully developed. ■ ■. in i ■ ■. ■ Public i ■ Hearing ■ r, ■ J ■ r ■. ■ Approval i ■ ■ of Plans ■• • I • ■. Notice of RAISE Award USDOT Agreement with County' III, NEPA and Planning Consistency Design Procurement Design, Permitting, ROW Acquisition (if necessary) Bid and Award Construction Construdion2 NMI 1 Eady Statutory Obligation of Funds June 30, 2024 2 Expenditure of Funds Deadline September 30, 2029 Revitalizing the Golden Gate City Community 125 U2.Ml Studies Previous studies (as detailed in the Previously Completed Project Components) documented the proposed project's potential impacts and mitigation strategies. Coordination with the Collier County Storm Water Division took place during the Golden Gate City Walkable Community Study14 to better understand the schedule related to the County's 10-year stormwater work program to replace the Golden Gate City drainage system. The County has been coordinating their water, wastewater, stormwater and sidewalk projects within the City to provide an economical approach to combining projects in the area and reduce disruption to the public. The proposed sidewalk network improvements will be coordinated and designed with the ongoing infrastructure projects to ensure alignment and coordination with the ultimate layout, thus eliminating rework. JJI ...- School safety was identified as a top concern during the Walhability Study public outreach The Golden Gate Parkway Complete Street Feasibility Study15 analyzed constructability and utility relocation efforts required for constructing the GGPCS Project. The proposed concept includes a 15-foot-wide utility corridor underneath the landscaped buffers and shared -use paths. 14 Golden Gate City Walkable Community Study https://www,colli a rm po.org/wp-content/u p to ads/Gold enGate- W a lk-Co m m-St u dy-Ad o pted.p df The GGAMP Restudy White Paper16 states that while the existing commercial development within Golden Gate City is sufficient to support its residents, some of the current commercial areas remain vacant and redevelopment renewal efforts are needed, particularly along Golden Gate Parkway. Agency Reviews and Approvals Complete Streets are a major objective of FDOT. The BCC, FDOT, and Collier MPO have participated in the bicycle and pedestrian master planning process. A Memorandum of Understanding dated December 14, 2016, was executed by the FHWA and FDOT. Therefore, the environmental review, consultation, and other actions required by applicable federal environmental laws for this project will be carried out by FDOT pursuant to 23 U.S.C. 327. Public Engagement Public engagement has been ongoing throughout the various studies performed within the community, including the Golden Gate City Walkable Community Study, GGAMP updates, and the GGPCS Study. Golden Gate Parkway Walkable Community Study. Public engagement during the study revealed the primary concern for the public was related to walking to schools because of the lack of sidewalks and lighting. Public outreach for the study included three community workshops and three stakeholder meetings. Public com- ments, such as prioritizing sidewalk additions along roadway segments within 0.5 mile of schools, were integrated directly into the needs assessment criteria. Two of the priority roadway segment projects are incorporated into the GGPCS Project. 5Golden Gate Parkway Complete Street Study https://www.colliercountyfL.00v/home/showpublisheddocument/ 97078/637546200638630000 1s Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy White Paper (2017) https://www.coL[iercountIdL.gov/home/showdocument?id=76351 Revitalizing the Golden Gate City Community 126 Golden Gate Area Master Plan Restudy. This study featured an extensive public en- gagement process that included outreach through a wide range of platforms between 2018 and 2020, including eight public work- shops, two public meetings, presentations to the Golden Gate City Civic Association, a website, a survey, and email distribution for project updates. The study and its recom- mendations were also part of the agenda packages for multiple BCC regular meetings. As a result of public workshops, the residents created the vision statement for Golden Gate City: GOLDEN GATE CITY IS A SAFE, DIVERSE, FAMILY -ORIENTED COMMUNITY THAT OFFERS EASY ACCESS TO EDUCATION, PARKS, SHOPPING, AND SERVICES WITHIN A VIBRANT, WALKABLE COMMUNITY Public comment was integrated into the Land Development Code changes for the Golden Gate Parkway Overlay District. This project is the catalyst for this vision. Public engagement is a critical part of Collier County's improvement efforts Golden Gate Complete Streets Study. Public outreach for this study was conducted to determine the preferred concept for the Golden Gate Parkway corridor. Public en - it gagement included online and in -person surveys, an informational webpage, press releases, social media notifications, presenta- tions, and an informational flyer distributed at community meetings and facilities, as well as pertinent government meetings. The online survey provided the greatest feedback that resulted in Concept 1 as the preferred option. The GGPCS Project uses Concept 1 as the recommended project alternative. State and Local Approvals This project, application, and commitment of funds are approved by the BCC. Input from the Golden Gate City Economic Development Zone Advisory Board, Golden Gate City Beautification Advisory Committee, Golden Gate Community Center Advisory Board, and Collier MPO will be incorporated into the design process. The network sidewalk im- provements included with the GGPCS Project are documented in the Collier MPO 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP). Collier County BCC understands the importance of this project for the Golden Gate community Federal Transportation Requirements This project does not require action by FHWA. This project is consistent with the Collier MPO 2019 Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan, as well as the Collier MPO 2045 LRTP. Revitalizing the Golden Gate City Community 127 Assessment of Project Risks and Mitigation Strategies Minimal risks are associated with this project. Procurement delays are not expected, as the size and scale of the work is well within the range handled on a routine basis by Collier County and FDOT. Anticipated procurement is not considered unusual in any way for this project. Utility conflicts were preliminarily assessed through communication with Sun- shine One Call. Potential conflicts were identified in the Complete Streets Feasibility Study, which summarized all potential utilities within and near the right-of-way. The project will include a utility survey to mitigate risk associated with utility conflicts. Further, Collier County has a Grants Compliance Department within the Office of Management and Budget for managing grant funds to ensure proper oversight and thorough documentation. The County's grants process will include the following: Existing Golden Gate Parkway Z ■ Identification of an internal Grant Compliance Coordinator who is responsible for tracking and reporting the grant from start to finish ■ Identification of a project evaluation team organized by the Grants Compliance Coordinator ■ Reporting schedule that is in accordance with the requirements of the RAISE Grant ■ Adherence to Office of Management and Budget guidance for accurately stating at each recording period the project progress, work performed, funds spent, jobs created/ sustained, and anticipated work for next reporting period ■ Award a NEPA documentation team prequalified with FDOT for Project Development and Environment ■ Award a design and construction team prequalified with FDOT for Design and Construction Rendering of Golden Gate Parkway Vision (Courtesy of Johnson Engineering) Revitalizing the Golden Gate City Community 128 This Benefit -Cost Analysis expands on the methodology proposed by the Benefit -Cost Analysis Guidance for Discretionary Grant Programs." The Benefit -Cost Analysis considers different impact areas for bicycling and walking, and evaluates the impact of utilitarian trips in addition to journey -to -work trips. The analysis considers local demo- graphic data and local travel patterns, trip distances, and public health data to create a more complete picture of the impacts of mode shift toward bicycling, walking, and transit that will result from the RAISE -funded GGPCS Project. This is a summary of cumulative project benefits over the 30-year evaluation period. Refer to Appendix C for the GGPCS Benefit - Cost Analysis methodology and complete results. Benefit/Cost = 3.5 The GGPCS Project will result in a mode shift away from vehicles and toward walking and biking " https://www.transr)ortation.ciov/sites/dot.ciov/files/2021- 02/Benefit Cost Analysis Guidance 2021.pdf Benefit -Cost Analysis Results Summary PeriodSummary of Return on Investment 30-Year Evaluation Benefit -Cost Ratio 3.5:1 Project Net Present Value $67,374,000 Benefits (includes 7% Discount Rate) Safety Reduced Fatalities, Injuries, and $60,180,000 Collision Cost Savings Mode Shift Bike Trips 11.9 Million I Walk Trips 29.7 Million Bus Trips 3 Million Vehicle Miles Traveled Reduced 49.3 Million State of Good Repair J Roadway Maintenance Cost $1,901,000-1 Savings Economic Competitiveness Household Vehicle Operation Cost $5,502,000 Savings Traffic Congestion Cost Savings $2,142,000 Environmental Sustainability J Reduced Emissions (3% Discount $1,344,000 Applied) and Water Pollution Resiliency $10,461,000 I Quality of Life Healthcare Cost Savings for $8,021,000 Increased Active Travel Walkability and Journey Ambience $4,411,000 Total Benefits (Present Value) $93,962,00Costs (includes 7% Discount Rate) Capital Costs $23,060,000 Work Zone Impacts $1,372,000 I Maintenance Costs $2,165,000 Total Costs (Present Value) $26,588,000 Revitalizing the Golden Gate City Community 129 3r i l�+ ..' � i ems■ _ �� b �,ti�� _ � �- „fie[-. �� ___ � ` _ y -,� � f, ``` ; ` • , ; n, _ Golden Gate Parkway Complete Streets ; ib Collier County 4' MA y r -7 L .. F June 2021 Let 11 COLLIER Metropolitan Planning Organlzatlan 2885 South Horseshoe Drive, Naples, FL 34104 ■ (239) 252-5814 a Fax (239) 252-5815 May 27, 2021 Honorable Pete Buttigieg United States Secretary of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590 Re: FY202I RAISE Grant Application — Golden Gate Parkway Complete Streets Dear Secretary Buttigieg: The Collier MPO is pleased to support Collier County's RAISE Grant Application for the Golden Gate Parkway Complete Streets Project. The Golden Gate Parkway project implements a number of MPO plans and wi[I help us meet our Long Range Transportation Plan goals related to safety, quality of Iife, economic competitiveness, racial equity, and environmental sustainability by improving access to transit and nonmotorized transportation. The MPO's Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan designates Golden Gate Parkway a priority for developing a Complete Streets/Safety Corridor Study because it serves a metropolitan statistical Area (Golden Gate City) that has a high concentration of disadvantaged minority residents who rely heavily on ride sharing, transit, walking and biking to access jobs and services; connects several elementary schools, other institutional and commercial land uses within a walkable distance; is a hub of transit activity (five bus routes circulate through Golden Gate City); has a high concentration of bicycle and pedestrian use and along with that, a high incidence of bicycle and pedestrian crashes involving vehicles; furthermore, the corridor is an important link in the regional bikeway network. If funded, the Golden Gate Parkway Complete Streets Project has the potential to serve as an innovative prototype for other transformational arterial road redesigns in Collier County. The award of a RAISE Grant to implement the project would constitute a tremendous step forward for transportation safety, equity, and environmental sustainability in Collier County, Sincerely, Anne McLau i Executive erector Copies to: MPO Board Members Mission: To protect, promote & improve the health of all people in Florida through integrated state, county & community efforts. Vision: To be the Healthiest State in the Nation June 28, 2021 Honorable Pete Buttigieg United States Secretary of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590 Re: FY2021 RAISE Grant Application — Golden Gate Parkway Complete Streets Dear Secretary Buttigieg: Ron DeSantis Govemor Scott A. Rivkees, MD State Surgeon General I am pleased to offer the Florida Department of Health in Collier County's letter of support for the Rebuilding American Infrastructure with Sustainability and Equity (RAISE) application submitted to U.S. Department of Transportation by Collier County Board of County Commissioners. The Golden Gate Parkway Complete Streets Transformation Project will expand and install elements for safer transportation in our community. RAISE funds will impact equity and community design that have been intensively studied over the last few years affecting the health of our residents. In 2018, the Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization Walkable Community Study, a multi -phased community and professional feedback process, researched and prioritized several projects proposed by this grant. The 2019 Bike/Ped Master Plan identified Golden Gate City as a high priority for environmental justice needs. 17% of the Golden Gate City population lives below the poverty level, and 1 in 5 residents carpools to work. Golden Gate City residents commute to work by bicycle at a rate 3 times that of the national average. Increasing the safety of active transportation in this corridor will reduce some of the most frequent high-speed vehicle -pedestrian collisions in the county, as well as promote physical activity that reduces chronic disease and obesity rates. RAISE funds will provide access to safe transportation to community centers that support health and quality of life, like faith -based organizations, education, parks, clinics, jobs, and essential services for residents of this economically vulnerable community. They would be a powerful investment to protect, promote, and improve the health of the residents and visitors of Collier County. The Florida Department of Health in Collier County respectfully requests your favorable consideration. Sincerely, p 5J Kimberly Kossler, MPH, RN, CPH Administrator & Health Officer Florida Department of Health in Collier County Florida Department of Health in Collier County Office of the Administrator, Kimberly Kossler, MPH, RN, CPH 3339 E. Tamiami Trail, Suite 145 • Naples, Florida 34112-4961 Accredited Health Department PHONE: 2391252-5332 • FAX 239r774-5653 ' : Public Health Accreditation Board www.FloridaHealth.gov (C-J)( BLUE ZONES PROJECT` Honorable Pete Buttigieg United States Secretary of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590 Re: FY2021 RAISE Grant Application — Golden Gate Parkway Complete Streets Dear Secretary Buttigieg: Blue Zones Project of Southwest Florida has been a proud partner of Collier County's Golden Gate Parkway Complete Streets Transformation Project. As an organization that is committed to enhancing community walkability, bikeability, and multi -modal transportation, Blue Zones Project has collaborated with Collier County to evaluate the Golden Gate Parkway Overlay and support their design for a safe, efficient and accessible corridor through Golden Gate City, FL. Blue Zones built environment experts Dan Burden and Dani Schaeffner have served as consultants on the Golden Gate Parkway design and our local team has aided in the community engagement process of sharing design concepts and collecting community feedback. This effort was facilitated online and face to face in both Spanish and English to create transparent conversations regarding residents' needs for the corridor. Over 60% of Golden Gate residents are Hispanic or Latino, experience higher rates of poverty (7% higher than the national average) and are less likely to have their own transportation. Creating a vibrant corridor that invites more recreation, viable and relevant business, higher density mixed use development and transportation solutions will vastly improve their overall well-being. These elements may also result in better employment opportunities closer to home and more options for housing at a lower percent AMI. In short, the Golden Gate Parkway Complete Streets Transformation Project has much higher implications for building a healthier community than just the design of the project in and of itself. Seventy-five percent of the census tracts in the project area are Persistent Poverty zones and as a result, the community suffers from higher rates of health disparities. By addressing safety, mobility, access to health care and healthy food while mitigating businesses that contribute to the accumulation of a food swamp, the social determinants of health and community resiliency will improve. Golden Gate City is a special, unique community. Residents take great pride in their heritage being reflected and celebrated within its four -square miles. This corridor improvement project will enhance community connections, relationships, and opportunities to preserve the diversity and identity that was the foundation of why residents decided to call Golden Gate City their home. Please contribute RAISE funding to the Golden Gate Complete Streets Transformation Project. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Megan Greer, Policy Lead Blue Zones Project SWFL Sponsored b NC" y Healthcare System Copyright © 2020 Blue Zones, LLC and Sharecare, Inc. All rights reserved. SouthwestFlorlda.BlueZorlesProject.com NAPLES PATHWAYS COAUTION S.gfe, bikeable, walkable communities May 27, 2021 To Whom This May Concern: Naples Pathways Coalition (NPC) is a non-profit advocacy group working to protect and provide equal access for vulnerable road users. Since its beginnings in 2002, NPC has worked tirelessly to help transform Collier County into a safe, walkable, and bikeable community. When roads are being designed or improved, we work with policymakers to ensure the needs of those who bike, walk, or run are planned for and included in the design. We also educate motorists, cyclists, and pedestrians about the "rules of the road" and each group's responsibilities when sharing our streets. Consistent with this mission, we support the proposed Golden Gate Parkway Complete Streets Project which includes a transformation of the existing infrastructure along Golden Gate Parkway. The project's wider sidewalks, street trees, and lighting will help make the corridor safer and more inviting for residents, visitors, and businesses. The families who live in this area are reliant on biking and walking to get to work, shopping, and school. Complete streets that provide for people traveling on foot, bike, or motorized vehicles are greatly needed throughout the Golden Gate area. Sincerely, Aekf/e Avla ,6iwvow Executive Director Naples Pathways Coalition 300 Fifth Avenue South, Suite 101, Box 464 • Naples, Florida 34102 • 239.777.7718 • NaplesPathways.org Cofler County Public Services Department Public Transit & Neighborhood Enhancement Division June 9, 2021 Honorable Pete Buttigieg United States Secretary of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590 Re: FY2021 RAISE Grant Application — Golden Gate Parkway Complete Streets Dear Secretary Buttigieg, l am writing to convey our support for Collier County's application to the US Department of Transportation (USDOT), Rebuilding American Infrastructure with Sustainability and Equity (RAISE). The Public Transit and Neighborhood Enhancement Division, who manages Collier Area Transit (CAT), supports the application because the construction of complete streets is consistent with the goals listed in our current Transit Development Plan. The construction of this project would enhance mobility within the Golden Gate community and allow for easier, safer, and more efficient movement for pedestrians, bicycles, and vehicular traffic. We have many riders that get on and off along the stops on Golden Gate Parkway, s❑ enhanced pedestrian features, like wider sidewalks, lighting, transit pull -offs, and upgrading stops into ADA compliance would benefit them immensely by providing enhanced safety and accessibility. It is our objective to create an optimized interconnected muitimodal mobility network, and this project could be a great step in reaching that outcome. The proposed area is along one of our most traveled bus routes and many riders would benefit from the improvements proposed within the project. With increased walkability through this project, it may entice more residents to use our transit system, further alleviating congestion on this road. The location and proximity of this project to existing transit stops, shopping, residential, and community amenities is ideal to serve this highly populated area with a high density of transit dependent residents. Riblic Transit & Nei ftorhood Ehhancement • 8300 Radio Road, Naples, Florida 34104.239-252-5840 • FAX 239-252.6628 • www.col liercointo .gou Public SeNices Department Public Transit & Neighborhood Enhancement Division Page 2 of 2 We look forward to Collier County and the US Department of Transportation (USDQT) working together to construct the much -needed improvements along Golden Gate Parkway. We urge USDOT to support this application. Sincerely, 46L-� Michelle Arnold, Director Public Transit and Neighborhood Enhancement (PINE) C Ir !; RgAc Tr,Yrf b Nxflxit=d F,hw + mat,'VX,0 P•)d0 PC'NI• tli,irs Rnnda 34 10 4 - 230-42-MU • FAx 235452.56n • roew c.6htocaLntfi qo. � � r s c,�SSc„ rain• aria Ci. :'1�irluri �nJ r Golden Gate Area Civic Association 4701 Golden Gate Parkway, Golden Gate, FL 34116 The Honorable Pete Buttigieg United States Secretary of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590 Re: FY2021 RAISE Grant Application — Golden Gate Parkway Complete Streets Dear Secretary Buttigieg, Over the past several years, the residents of Golden Gate city have partnered with Collier County government to create a plan that will enhance the quality of life in our culturally diverse, family - oriented community of 36,000 residents. To bring this plan to reality, we seek the support of a Rebuilding American Infrastructure with Sustainability and Equity (RAISE) grant to revitalize Golden Gate Parkway, the "Main Street" of our community. We are a tight -knit community with six times the density of the City of Naples. To better ensure the safety of our residents, it is vital that we expand our pedestrian network with wider facilities that will allow bicyclists and pedestrians to safely connect to employment and shopping hubs, churches, community centers, schools, government offices, parks and libraries. In addition to making our community safer, we believe these improvements will also attract businesses and strengthen our newly formed Golden Gate Economic Development Zone. The enhanced mobility will provide job opportunities, build community spirit, and create a safe community where people want to live and work. When complete, we invite you to be our Guest of Honor for a special Parkway Dedication Ceremony featuring the best of all that Golden Gate has to offer with Spanish, Haitian and American cuisine including your favorite, Vigil's Green Chile Jerky. Most sincerely, Kaydee Tuff President Golden Gate Civic Association GOLDEN GATq= BEAUTIFICATION MSTU 8300 Radio Road Naples, FL 34104 J1117e 16, 2021 To.- Honorable Pete Buttigieg United States Secretary of Transportation 1200 New .Iersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590 Re; FY202 l RAISE Grant Application — Golden Gate Parkway Complete Streets Dear Secretary Buttigieg: PIease consider our application for the FY 2021 RAISE Grant. Golden Gate City (GG City) is an older, diverse etlinic community with about 5200 families (many with English as a second language). GG City has one of the highest percentages of low income households in Collier County/Naples area. Along the main thoroughfare in GG City, pedestrian safety assets such as good lighting, sidewalks & bike lanes are inadequate or non existent. Improvements along this corridor will not only increase safety for all the residents but may spark investor interest by enticing them to make improvements in current aging businesses & housing along the corridor. Creating a higher quality of life is the first step to attracting new residents, jobs, and investors. PIease help us take the first step. Sincerely, . I gczlh__c e- C' 61— +-41�� MSAdvisory Committee Chair l Vice Chair 1 Member *Municipal Service Taxing Unit GG City Civic Association Board Member 21 year GG City Resident MONTHLY MSTU MEETING LOCATION GULDEN GATE COMMUNITY CENTER 4701 GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY NAPLE's, FL 34I16 V� GREATER ; <0 NAPLES CHAMBER Honorable Pete Buttigieg United States Secretary of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590 Re: FY2021 RAISE Grant Application — Golden Gate Parkway Complete Streets Dear Secretary Buttigieg: At the Greater Naples Chamber, we believe that vibrant, sustainable neighborhoods are crucial to maintaining a healthy economy. That is why we support Collier County's application for a Rebuilding American Infrastructure with Sustainability and Equity grant to revitalize the Golden Gate City neighborhood. This project will improve this diverse bedroom community by building better bicycle and pedestrian facilities to connect residents to employment opportunities, schools and businesses along the corridor. While this improvement would be welcome in any neighborhood, it's a necessary improvement in Golden Gate City where residents are three times as likely to commute to work on bicycle than the national average. Furthermore, this project has the potential to entice more businesses to invest in the community. By rebuilding the look and feel of this vital corridor, we can build upon the work started by community leaders to revitalize the area and local economy. We strongly support Collier County's application for a Rebuilding American Infrastructure with Sustainability and Equity (RAISE) grant for the Golden Gate Parkway complete streets project. Once complete, this project will enhance safety, improve residents' quality of life, and encourage economic competitiveness in the community. Thank you for your consideration. Please do not hesitate to reach out if you have any questions. Warm regards, Michael Dalby President & CEO Greater Naples Chamber 2390 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 210, Naples, FL 34103 1 Phone (239) 262-6376 1 Fax (239) 262-8374 1 www.napleschamber.org 8300 Radio Road Naples, FL 34104 Tb: Honorable Pete Buttigieg United States Secretary of Transportanoti 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590 '6�"teL� ff lc".e r / ' �'. �0r --J 06 - Re: FY2021 RAISE Grant Application — Golden Gate Parkway Complete Streets Dear Secretary Buttigieg: /.tom - Ajj.P-1 . v'(4 I VV.4101 7 1 r t`l Narne MSTU* Advisory Committee Chair 1 Vice Chair 1 Member & Golden Gate resident * Municipal Service Taxing Unit MONTHLY MSTU MEETING LOCATION GOLDEN GATE COMMUNITY CENTER 4701 GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY NAPLEs, FL 34116 Des Moines, IA 50312 To: Honorable Pete Buttigieg United States Secretary of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE Washington, DC 20590 Re: FY 2021 Raise Grant Application/ Golden Gate Parkway Complete Streets Dear Secretary Buttigieg: My name is CeCe Zenti and I have the privilege of serving as Vice Chair of the Golden Gate Economic Development Zone Advisory Board. We have a critical need to revitalize the corridor of Golden Gate Parkway from Santa Barbara to Collier Blvd. (951). This corridor carries heavy traffic as a main east/west connector for Collier County. This corridor runs through Golden Gate City and just off this corridor are two grade schools, a very large middle school and two high schools. This community is home to nearly 36,000,and is a working community. The mix of retires and work force blends well along with a rich fabric of many cultures and languages. People walk and bike in this area and kids are a huge part of the foot and biking traffic, not only going to school but also going to their actives, as well as going on errands for Mom and grandmother. Like you, I am acutely aware of the need to have a safe Community for our youth to grow and thrive . We have many wonderful programs, but they need the safe sidewalks and bike ways to get there and back. As an example, we just brought First Tee into this community for all Collier County kids but especially for Golden Gate City kids to be able to walk/bike to this new amenity. Now, we need to fix this corridor for kids and adults. Golden Gate City has the highest bus ridership in the County, much of the workforce, getting to and from the bus stops along Golden Gate Parkway is very important and further more the distance from the fast moving traffic and pedestrians is less than ideal from a safety perspective, especially if there are small children on their way to a doctor's appointment or shopping out of the area with parents. Collier County Commissioners have been working on these issues and have plans that will address so many of our needs to make this area much safer, but the ability to bring this plan forward takes funding. Mr. Secretary, we need your help and respectfully ask for funds from the FV 2021 Raise Grant Funding for: Golden Gate Parkway Complete Streets. Your keen interest in Community and country is well known by your record of serving your country, serving as mayor and now serving as Secretary in this Administration. Thank you for your service. Please feel free to contact me at anytime to further discuss our request. We would be most honored if you would visit Golden Gate City, to see firsthand what we are doing in this community. Thank you for your attention to our request. We pray this pleading will meet with success. Sincerely, ,-� e e nti f 4226 27`h Ct SW #203 Naples, Florida 34116 239-455-9863 Vice Chair Golden Gate Economic Development Zone Advisory Board Golden Gate Community Center Advisory Board Golden Gate Civic Association Board/ Secretary Par Four Condo Association Board/Secretary Southwest Florida Press Club !�M �. r� NABOR Maples Area Board of REALTORS' 239.597.1666 r+Kw+:NABOR.com 1455 Pine Ridge Road 239.597.7725 fa-v TI V01, NapiesArea.com Naples, FL 34109 Yoiu Leaduig (testince for Business. Honorable Pete Buttigieg United States Secretary of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590 Re: FY2021 RAISE Grant Application — Golden Gate Parkway Complete Streets Dear Secretary Buttigieg: For over 75 years, the Naples Area Board of REALTORS' (NABOR), a local board of REALTORS and real estate professionals, has served Collier County by promoting homeownership, private property rights and initiatives that support vibrant communities. On behalf of our 7000+ members, we would like to extend our full support for the Golden Gate Parkway Complete Streets Transformation Project. According to our most recent Market Reports, which track home listings and sales within Collier County (excluding Marco Island), home sales between January and April 2021 increased 73.8 percent compared to the same time frame in 2020. We firmly believe that the Golden Gate Parkway Complete Streets Transformation Project is essential to sustainable growth in the Golden Gate community of 36,000 residents, in which 17% live in poverty according to the 2019 American Community Survey. The Golden Gate Parkway Complete Streets Transformation Project was developed to enhance safety, sustain growth and improve economic competitiveness in an area that is in dire need of all three. The implementation of this project will result in the installation of wider sidewalks, street lights, and lighting thereby establishing a safer environment in the Golden Gate corridor and a better quality of life for current present and future residents. Furthermore, the project is expected to transform and revitalize the area by improving the appearance and atmosphere of the corridor and increasing public access to education and jobs. For the reasons enumerated above, the Naples Area Board of REALTORS extends our full support of the Golden Gate Parkway Complete Streets Transformation Project. We appreciate the concern and careful consideration of the USDOT selection committee in awarding Collier County with a RAISE Grant to assist in making this vital project a reality. Thank you. Sincerely, ( f � (?/', � 161 uwk Corey McCloskey, 2021 President Naples Area Board of REALTORS June 8, 2021 Honorable Pete Buttigieg United States Secretary of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590 Re; FY2021 RAISE Grant Application - Golden Gate Parkway Complete Streets Dear Secretary Buttigieg: Collier County Community Traffic Safety Team (CTST) is pleased to submit a letter in support of Collier County and their efforts in applying for the Rebuilding American Infrastructure with Sustainability and Equity (RAISE) grant for the Community of Golden Gate and the Golden Gate Parkway Project. The CTST is a locally based data driven group of safety advocates who are committed to a common goal of improving traffic safety in our community by integrating the 4 "E" disciplines that work in traffic safety: Engineering, Enforcement, Education/Public Information, and Emergency Services. We strive to make the community safer by re -thinking street design to increase connectivity and build for multi -modal transit through following the Complete Streets Guide. Golden Gate Parkway is the main thoroughfare through the community but is built for cars alone. The new vision would connect people to their community; the recreation center, parks, and business as well as allow safe access to the 9 neighboring schools and after school activities. The proposed project would install wider sidewalks, street trees, and lighting thereby making the corridor safer, and more inviting for residents, visitors, and businesses. It will also provide bike lanes where none currently exist and will move automobile traffic more efficiently and decrease the potential for crashes. All of these changes will increase the well-being and safety for all of the citizens, as well as creating a safe place that people want to live and work in. Collier County Community Traffic Safety Team looks forward to continuing to support Collier County in their efforts to make all of the roads safer and accessible to all road users. Sincerely, Jodi Walborn Collier County CTST Chairperson 16650 Medical Blvd Naples, FL 34110 Aft CBIA June 28, 2021 Honorable Pete Buttigieg United States Secretary of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590 Re: FY2021 RAISE Grant Application — Golden Gate Parkway Complete Streets Dear Secretary Buttigieg: We are writing on behalf of the 450+companies representing the Collier Building Industry Association (CBIA). CBIA is a local Collier County trade association with a mission focused on advocacy, education, networking, and philanthropy. CBIA member companies have numerous employees and their families who live in Golden Gate City and the surrounding community. According to the most recent statistics, upwards of 20% of those living in Golden Gate City work in the construction industry. This project, if funded, will install wider sidewalks, street trees, and lighting, thereby making the corridor safer and more inviting for residents and visitors alike. And while safety is the number one objective, we believe the project will stimulate revitalization, redevelopment, and new development of the Golden Gate Parkway corridor, which is central to economic growth and sustainability for this community and its working-class residents. We appreciate your leadership and ask for your consideration of this grant which would provide a strong foundation for reaching the aforementioned goals. The members of CBIA strongly support this grant request. Sincerely, (/L- 34 Ci a.'. ✓ Drew Kowalczyk Amelia Vas uez PulteGroup CBIA Executive Officer CBIA President Collier Building Industry Association 3200 Bailey Lane, Suite 110, Naples, FL 34105 1 (239) 436-6100 www.CBlA.net I www.ParadeofHomes Naples. corn I www.Sand DollarAward.corn yip@c ltsuzy g (7c BNpoy ooq gp sucsiUs q. 8300 15gq!o 15osq' Msbjsz' Hougs 34401 • S30 S2S 28V0 • LVX S30-S2S-BBSB • AMW'so!!!siconU�o BOA 29bcr?, iI fP6 C11002c (0 MgIK or. piKc fO MOLK' ob1op2 pctUS CLGufeq' glouR mifp fps eulJUuceq gccc22iptpfA (o briplic fi.gu2b0LfuQ0U guq cx(W fpc bi.olccf I2 locg(cq MI(pW gU smu MIIp p!Ep boACI.a LUfCB' fp82C I.C2IgCUf2 Mill LOCI fpc pcuCTIf2 fLSijab0Lf9fI0U UiOUR fIJI2 COLLigOL fpgf moniq LCgf1CC (LUtIC uliq IWbL0AC wSclMuX couglflOu2' d2 tmbL,one fLgu2b0LfUQ0u obgou2 guq n2c obbrlppc twmif' Ipt2 bLOlGCf monlq !wbecf gll Woge2 ob Ccufrgi C0LLig0L LOL Le2igcuf2 guq AI2IfoL2' It i2 onL P051 (o bLOWO(C W ifigfiAc2 (pgf M1112nbb04guq J,pi2 bL01cof 1192 (pc UpIIIfX fO ILg1J2t0LW eolgcu eufS CIfX uuq CLCUfC g UJOLG AIpLSUf' MCiCOIJJIUP, Logq' IU LigCL2pIb ou bnppc p.Uu2boT.pgou J2 iIKClXI Mpicp MJii 9i2o Lcgftcc fIJC uriwpci. OL CUL2 oU fpc jy\t(p tucccg2cq gc2(nJg(iou2 LOL bcoblc fo Mif' bumcq Mlfp It.Un2if 2fob tulbL0Aeiueuf2' UU iUct.Cg2s LCAI(UIISC g1C bULKMUA fO CUpUIJCC [PC 2fLCC(2CgbC fpgf mill pLIUR iU IJCM pfi2I1iC22 uijq obbOLfnutf!G2' OgfC CIf2,' J,I112 cowwnu (a I2 g bLTWG 10CUftOU LOL Ipp bLo1cof 92 I( COnlq i.CgfICC COUR82(tou uuq c0JJ2(Lncfi0u oblpi2 bL.01ecf morilq cupguce WopilgX bof. ull abc2 0b(LUu2b0L(HQ0fJ IpLonSp eolgcu 2np2pufigl pcucg(2 fo Lc2igcuf2 ob fps JJctElJpoi..pooq u2 mell g2 Ipo2e bg22ItJR IfJLOnSp' ype gbbllcggoJJ pscgn2C fps cou2fLftcfiou OLCOIJJbIc(C 2fl.Ccf2 glow colgcu MIG bgLKMS)\ conlq pgAc J,pc COIiicL CornJfa bnplic 1=2boLlsfiou ygni20LX CoWWi(fec (bJVC) 2nbbOLf2 fps ELUuf (ISVI2E)' J,L9u2b0Lf9fJ0U (I12DOD' gepnilq!uR VWCLICUIJ IUji.92fLfICffiLC MIIp 2f12fu WgpllgX giJq pdfiif), I UIJJ MLIQUR CO COUAca orm 2nbbOL( lOL. COiiicL Coauf?,,2 gbbpcugou CO fpc II2 DCbgLfuJcuf OI DGUL 2cC.C[UL. Bfl4!Fxlcli' gc: I k30S1 KVI2E eLguf ybblicgfiou — eolgcu Cglc bRrtAO, C0UJblafc 2fLccf2 M92pWSf0u' DC S0260 IS0014CM ICL2CX yneune' 2E nui(cq 2fgfc2 2ccLcf9f. , o{Ziuu2bolfuflou Houoispie bGfe BfIMRIcli 'Inuc 12'3031 yip@cl«zg v mG!Oppovoq Eipmjcowclg • 030015oq!o Eoeq' Mobloe' Ejougs 3gIoI.532-323-pSgo • ENX 530-325-OO5B • NUVA'cop!alconup U Bon bnAAc yrsu2bor.(9Frou ygn1200, Cowwlffcc (b.LYC) y,Ir• Zopu Dry,Isrco III' CAulr.wuu 21uccrsI),' 21ucersJA cscowiucuq f12DOI Io 2ribbog.r qip ubbllcugou' (II2DOD [o collupOLUfG ou rwbcoeluR tpr2 plRpla Ccsncleq couigor. IprouRp colgeu eEifG Cg)v Me MG urc cxcllcq Loy. Ipc obboclnulfX oI Colger. ConuFA uuq IPc n2 Dabu4fJJGUF ob ycuu2bor.I9llou Thomas & Barbara Anderson 3172 52"d Street SW Naples, FL 34116 June 26, 2021 Honorable Pete Buttigieg United States Secretary of Transportation 1200 New Jersey Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20590 RE: FY2021 RAISE Grant Application — Golden Gate Parkway Complete Streets Dear Secretary Buttigieg, I understand Collier County's Growth Management Department Transportation Planning section, on behalf of Collier County, is applying for U.S. Department of Transportation funds to revitalize the Golden Gate City Community with a project called the Golden Gate Parkway Street Project. My husband and I purchased a home in Golden Gate City in 1993. Over the past 28 years we have seen residents and business businesses come and go, and we have seen a decline in how the area looks. The area needs a facelift so we can once again feel a sense of pride about where we live. I believe doing improvements to the Golden Gate Parkway corridor is long overdue. This would mean so much to me and my family to see this area revitalized. Wider sidewalks, street trees and better lighting would make Golden Gate Parkway a safer place to drive, walk, ride bikes, and most importantly live. The artist rendering of the Proposed Golden Gate Parkway Complete Streets Project is beautiful and would do so much to revive this area. I know improving the infrastructure and developing a more attractive community will draw new businesses and bring new opportunities to the area. I am excited at the possibility of beautifying the area I call home. I hope you will rule in favor of the Rebuilding American infrastructure with Sustainability and Equity (RAISE) grant. Sincerely, %Sa,abwa r. Andi im. Barbara L. Anderson 3r i l�+ ..' � i ems■ _ �� b �,ti�� _ � �- „fie[-. �� ___ � ` _ y -,� � f, ``` ; ` • , ; n, _ Golden Gate Parkway Complete Streets ; ib Collier County 4' MA y r -7 L .. F June 2021 Cost Golden Gate Parkway Complete Streets Project from Santa Barbara Boulevard to Collier Boulevard Preliminary Cost Estimate July 2021 Project Cost Summary Table Golden Gate Parkway Complete Streets Construction Elements Roadway Construction (Concept 1)' LS 1 $19,281,810.00 Additional Sidewalk (Network) LS 1 $2,627,460.00 Additional Stormwater Improvements2 LS 1 $2,590,180.00 Lighting' LS 1 $1,270,360.00 Construction Subtotal Professional Services (NEPA Documentation) Professional Services (Design, Permitting, CEI) $19,281,810.00 $2,627,460.00 $2, 590,180.00 $1,270,360.00 $25,769,810.00 $500,000 $4,979,640.00 Total Match County Funds $6,250,000.00 Total RAISE Requested (Federal) $24,999,450.00 Refer to Concept 1 Detailed Cost Estimate table for itemized breakdown before contingency. 2 Refers to all project elements required for stormwater treatment in addition to the line items identified in the Concept 1 Detailed Cost Estimate table. Concept 1 Detailed Cost Estimate Source: Golden Gate Parkway Complete Street Study (Johnson Engineering) 7Constructi D• Quantity ray Mobilization LS 1 $1,577,112.67 $1,577,112.67 102-1 Maintenance of Traffic LS 1 $1,182,834.50 $1,182,834.50 104-10-3 Sediment Barrier (Silt Fence) LF 19,497 $1.50 $29,245.65 110-1-1 Clearing & Grubbing LS 1 $1,003,769.63 $1,003,769.63 120-1 Regular Excavation CY 6453 $8.00 $51,626.67 120-6 Embankment CY 27964 $14.00 $391,502.22 160-4 Type B Stabilization (12" Min) SY 19,821 $4.50 $89,194.50 285-710 Optional Base, Base Group 10 SY 112,374 $26.50 $2,977,905.70 327-70-1 Milling Existing Asphalt Pavement, SY 9,406 $3.00 $28,216.80 1" Average Depth Revitalizing the Golden Gate City Community I A-1 Concept 1 Detailed Cost Estimate Source: Golden Gate Parkway Complete Street Study (Johnson Engineering) 327-70-6 Milling Existing Asphalt Pavement, SY 80,161 $3.50 $280,564.90 1.5" Average Depth 334-1-13 Superpave Asphaltic Concrete, TN 18,542 $100.00 $1,854,165.00 Traffic C 3" 425-1-321 Inlet, Curb, Type P-2, <10' EA 25 $6,200.00 $155,000.00 425-1-521 Inlet, Ditch Bottom, Type C, <10' EA 2 $4,000.00 $8,000.00 425-2-61 Manholes, P-8, <10' EA 25 $4,400.00 $110,000.00 430-175-115 Pipe Culvert, Optional Material, LF 938 $110.00 $103,125.00 Round S/Cd, 15" 430-175-130 Pipe Culvert, Optional Material, LF 17,880 $130.00 $2,324,400.00 Round S/Cd, 30" 520-1-10 Concrete Curb & Gutter, Type F LF 19,540 $25.00 $488,500.00 520-2-1 Concrete Curb, Type A LF 20,290 $32.00 $649,292.80 522-2A Concrete, 6" Thick (sidewalk) SY 22,078 $58.00 $1,280,512.40 522-213 Concrete, 6" Thick (driveway) SY 1,733 $58.00 $100,496.60 526-1-1 Pavers, Architectural, Roadway SY 619 $85.00 $52,632.00 527-2 Detectable Warnings SF 4,203 $31.00 $130,286.80 530-3-4 Riprap-Rubble, F&I, Ditch Lining TN 30.0 $185.00 $5,550.00 (1.5' Depth) 570-1-2 Performance Turf (SOD) SY 47,038 $3.00 $141,112.80 LND-1 Landscaping MI 2.0 $295,000.00 $590,000.00 ASB-1 As -built Survey LS 1 $22,500.00 $22,500.00 1 Roadway Subtotal $15,62=5 Signing and Markin 700-1-11 Single Post Sign, F&I, Ground AS 22 $330.00 $7,260.00 Mount, up to 12 SF 700-1-50 Single Post Sign, Relocate AS 79 $190.00 $15,010.00 700-1-60 Single Post Sign, Remove AS 8 $30.00 $240.00 710-11-101 Painted Pavement Markings, GM 7.322 $1,000.00 $7,322.00 Standard, White, Solid, 6" 710-11-123 Painted Pavement Markings, LF 5,449 $1.00 $5,449.10 Standard, White, Solid, 12" 710-11-124 Painted Pavement Markings, LF 526.7 $1.10 $579.37 Standard, White, Solid, 18" Revitalizing the Golden Gate City Community I A-2 Concept 1 Detailed Cost Estimate Source: Golden Gate Parkway Complete Street Study (Johnson Engineering) 710-11-125 Painted Pavement Markings, LF 6,014 Standard, White, Solid, 24" 710-11-131 Painted Pavement Markings, GM 0.1815 Standard, White, Skip, 3-9 Skip, 6" Wide 710-11-131 Painted Pavement Markings, GM 15.1497 Standard, White, Skip, 10-30 Skip, 6" Wide 710-11-141 Painted Pavement Markings, GM 0.4158 Standard, White, 2-4 Dotted Guideline, 6" 710-11-160 Painted Pavement Markings, Std., EA 3 White, Message or Symbol (Merge) 710-11-160 Painted Pavement Markings, Std., EA 16 White, Message or Symbol (Only) 710-11-170 Painted Pavement Markings, EA 66 Standard, White, Arrows (Right Arrow) 710-11-170 Painted Pavement Markings, EA 101 Standard, White, Arrows (Left Arrow) 710-11-170 Painted Pavement Markings, EA 3 Standard, White, Arrows (Merge Arrow) 710-11-170 Painted Pavement Markings, EA 5 Standard, White, Arrows (Right/Thru) 710-11-170 Painted Pavement Markings, EA 2 Standard, White, Arrows (Left/Thru) 710-11-170 Painted Pavement Markings, EA 1 Standard, White, Arrows (U-Turn) 710-11-201 Painted Pavement Markings, GM 4.1703 Standard, Yellow, Solid, 6" 710-11-241 Painted Pavement Markings, Std., GM 0.8611 Yellow, 2-4 Dotted Guideline, 6" $1.50 $450.00 $475.00 $550.00 $40.00 $40.00 $30.00 $30.00 $30.00 $30.00 $30.00 $30.00 $1,000.00 $550.00 Signing and Marking Subtotal Lighting 630-2-11 Conduit, Furnish & Install, Open LF 4370 $12.00 Trench $9,020.40 $81.68 $7,196.11 $228.69 $120.00 $640.00 $1, 980.00 $3,030.00 $90.00 $150.00 $60.00 $30.00 $4,170.30 $473.61 $63,131.25 $52,440.00 Revitalizing the Golden Gate City Community I A-3 Concept 1 Detailed Cost Estimate Source: Golden Gate Parkway Complete Street Study (Johnson Engineering) 630-2-12 Conduit, Furnish & Install, LF 13110 $25.00 $327,750.00 Directional Bore 635-2-12 Pull and Splice Box, Furnish & EA 50 $1,700.00 $85,000.00 Install, 24"X36" Cover Size 639-1-112 Electrical Power Service, F&I, AS 4 $2,500.00 $10,000.00 Overhead, Meter Purchased by Contract 715-1-12 Lighting Conductors, F&I, LF 52440 $1.50 $78,660.00 Insulated, No. 6 715-4-14 Light Pole Complete, F&I, Standard EA 109 $5,500.00 $600,875.00 Pole, Standard Foundation, 45' Mount 715-500-1 Pole Cable Distribution System, EA 109 $560.00 $61,180.00 Conventional, F&I 715-7-11 Load Center, F&I, Secondary EA 4 $11,500.00 $46,000.00 Voltage Lighting Subtotal $1,261,905.00 630-2-11 Conduit, Furnish & Install, Open LF 500 $12.00 $6,000.00 Trench 630-2-12 Conduit, Furnish & Install, LF 2,400 $25.00 $60,000.00 Directional Bore 632-7-1 Signal Cable, New or PI 6 $5,400.00 $32,400.00 Reconstructed Intersection, Furnish & Install 632-7-6 Signal Cable, Remove - PI 6 $900.00 $5,400.00 Intersection 633-2-31 Fiber Optic Connection, Splice EA 6 $50.00 $300.00 633-2-32 Fiber Optic Connection, EA 18 $75.00 $1,350.00 Termination 633-3-12 Fiber Optic Connection Hardware, EA 6 $68.00 $408.00 F&I, Splice Tray 633-3-13 Fiber Optic Connection Hardware, EA 6 $48.00 $288.00 F&I, Pre -terminated Connector Assembly 633-3-14 Fiber Optic Connection Hardware, EA 6 $170.00 $1,020.00 F&I, Buffer Tube Fan Out Kit Revitalizing the Golden Gate City Community I A-4 Concept 1 Detailed Cost Estimate Source: Golden Gate Parkway Complete Street Study (Johnson Engineering) Pay Item No. Description Unit Quantity Unit Price Pay Item Total 633-3-15 Fiber Optic Connection Hardware, EA 6 $1,700.00 $10,200.00 F&I, Pre -terminated Patch Panel 633-3-17 Fiber Optic Connection Hardware, EA 6 $325.00 $1,950.00 F&I, Connector Panel 635-2-11 Pull & Splice Box, F&I, 13" X 24" EA 96 $750.00 $72,000.00 Cover Size 635-2-12 Pull & Splice Box, F&I, 24" X 36" EA 6 $1,200.00 $7,200.00 Cover Size 639-1-112 Electrical Power Service, F&I, AS 6 $2,700.00 $16,200.00 Overhead Meter Purchased by Contractor From Power Company 639-2-1 Signal, Electrical Service Wire, F&I LF 600 $7.00 $4,200.00 641-2-12 Prestressed Conc. Pole, F&I, Type EA 6 $1,500.00 $9,000.00 P-II Service Pole 646-1-11 Aluminum Signals Pole, F&I, EA 40 $1,500.00 $60,000.00 Pedestal 646-1-60 Aluminum Signals Pole, Remove EA 40 $300.00 $12,000.00 649-21-10 Steel Mast Arm Assembly, Furnish EA 21 $54,000.00 $1,134,000.00 and Install, 60' Single Arm 649-26-5 Steel Mast Arm Assembly, EA 13 $6,000.00 $78,000.00 Remove, Deep Foundation, Bolt on Attachment 650-1-14 Vehicular Traffic Signal, Furnish & AS 63 $975.00 $61,425.00 Install - Aluminum, 3 Section, 1 Way 650-1-16 Vehicular Traffic Signal, Furnish & AS 21 $1,300.00 $27,300.00 Install - Aluminum, 4 Section, 1 Way 653-1-11 Pedestrian Signal, Furnish & Install AS 40 $725.00 $29,000.00 Led Count Down, 1 Way 660-4-10 Vehicle Detection System- Video, EA 6 $6,500.00 $39,000.00 Furnish & Install, Complete System 663-1-111 Signal Priority and Pre-Emption EA 6 $5,750.00 $34,500.00 System, F&I, Optical, Cabinet Electronics 663-1-112 Signal Priority and Pre-Emption EA 21 $2,200.00 $46,200.00 System, F&I, Optical, Detector Pedestrian Detector, F&I, EA 40 $1,325.00 $53,000.00 I665-1-12 Accessible Revitalizing the Golden Gate City Community I A-5 Concept 1 Detailed Cost Estimate Source: Golden Gate Parkway Complete Street Study (Johnson Engineering) 670-5-112 Traffic Controller Assembly, F&I, AS 6 $30,100.00 $180,600.00 NEMA, 2 Pre-Emption Plans 670-5-600 Traffic Controller Assembly, AS 6 $725.00 $4,350.00 Remove Controller and Cabinet 684-1-1 Managed Field Ethernet Switch, EA 6 $4,150.00 $24,900.00 Layer 2, Furnish & Install 685-1-11 Uninterruptible Power Supply, EA 6 $4,900.00 $29,400.00 Furnish & Install, Line Interactive 700-3-201 Sign Panel, Furnish & Install EA 12 $600.00 $7,200.00 Overhead Mount, Up to 12 SF 700-5-21 Internally Illuminated Sign EA 21 $3,000.00 $63,000.00 715-7-12 Load Center, F&I, Primary Voltage EA 6 $13,200.00 $79,200.00 Signals Subtotal $2,190,991.00 Construction Subtotal $19,143,573.90 Revitalizing the Golden Gate City Community I A-6 3r i l�+ ..' � i ems■ _ �� b �,ti�� _ � �- „fie[-. �� ___ � ` _ y -,� � f, ``` ; ` • , ; n, _ Golden Gate Parkway Complete Streets ; ib Collier County 4' MA y r -7 L .. F June 2021 Benefit -Cost Summary This document summarizes the benefit -cost analysis (BCA) for the proposed Golden Gate Parkway Complete Streets project. Primary benefits include a reduction in acci- dents resulting from safety improvements, and benefits associated with a significant shift from personal vehicle use to active transporta- tion and transit. The benefits from a reduction in vehicle miles traveled (VMT) include reduced vehicle operating costs, reduced emissions, reduced congestion, and reduced roadway maintenance costs. Other benefits include the health benefits for residents who now walk or bike and increased resiliency during flooding events. With a 7 percent discount rate, the net present value (NPV) is estimated at $67.4 million and the Benefit -Cost Ratio (BCR) is 3.5. All values are presented in 2019 dollars. Approach The Golden Gate Parkway Complete Streets (GGPCS) Project's initial development in- cludes the NEPA evaluation and documenta- tion, as well as design. The initial development activities are expected to begin in 2022 and be complete by 2024. Construction for the project is anticipated to begin in 2025 and take 2 years to complete. Once the project is constructed, the roadway's useful life is estimated at over 25 years if pavement milling and resurfacing occurs approximately 15 years after con- struction. Based on the 2021 U.S. Department of Transportation Benefit -Cost Analysis Guidance for Discretionary Grant Programs (hereinafter `BCA Guidance")', an analysis period of 30 years was used, as this project includes full reconstruction of a roadway. The analysis period is from 2022 through 2051 and i https://www.transportation.gov/sites/dot.gov/files/2021- 02/Benefit%20Cost%20Analysis%20Guidance%202021.pdf includes the full development and construction period of the project, plus the 25-year opera- ting period after construction is complete. There was no residual value calculation because the project lifecycle period is equal to the operating period. All values were discounted to present values to account for the time value of money, using a discount rate of 7 percent, apart from 3 percent discount rate for emissions benefit, as specified in the BCA Guidance. Where possible, benefits were quantified using the recommended approach, parameters, and monetary values from the BCA Guidance. For certain benefits where values or methodology were not provided in this guidance, the methodology and sources are explained. Demand Base Demand The baseline number of trips by local residents that take place on Golden Gate Parkway is assumed to be 2.3 daily trips per adult in the study area population. This equates to 48,000 daily trips, and 26,500 daily vehicle trips, after applying the average vehicle occupancy and car mode share assumptions shown in the tables below, which was validated against the Average Annual Daily Traffic volumes on the corridor.' Travel demand is assumed to increase in line with the local population at a rate of 1.5 percent per year. Base mode share assumptions for biking and walking are based on the 2017 National Household Travel Survey (NHTS)' commute mode share for the South Atlantic region. To estimate the overall mode share for all trip purposes, a multiplier was derived using NHTS data on mode shares for commuting and all other trip purposes. The commute Golden Gate Parkway Complete Streets Study (April 2021) https://n hts.orn l.gov/ Revitalizing the Golden Gate City Community I C-1 aenr .. mode share is assumed to be 1 percent for bike and 1.8 percent for walk, with a multiplier of 0.93 for bike and 1.03 for walk, to arrive at an overall mode share of 0.9 percent for bike and 5.5 percent for walk. Bus mode shares were estimated using rider- ship data of the annual number of passengers boarding and alighting on Golden Gate Parkway in 2019. Mode Shift The project is expected to create a mode shift from private automobile to bike, walk, and bus. The associated reduction in car mode share (and hence, VMT) is a key driver of many benefits described in the following sections. The walkability improvements from the GGPCS Project is assumed to increase the mode share for walking from 5.5 percent to 10.5 percent. This is considered a conservative assumption because the national average is 10 percent and the Golden Gate City area has relatively low rate of car ownership. Accord- ing to the 2017 NHTS, 28 percent of all metropolitan trips are 1 mile or less, most of which could easily be completed by foot or bike if appropriate infrastructure exists. Bike mode share is expected to increase by 2 percent based on Smart Growth America Complete Streets Research that found that for typical U.S. cities, each additional mile of bike lanes per square mile is associated with an approximate 1 percent increase in the share of workers commuting by bicycle.' Bus ridership is expected to increase because of upgrading and replacing aging bus stop infrastructure to Americans with Disabilities Act standards and the addition of bus pull -off zones for safer loading/unloading, as well as ' https://smartgrowthamerica.orci/resources/publictransportation- be nefits-of-comp lete-streets walkability improvements that improve the first/last mile experience. Mode Shift Miles Traveled The reduction in car miles traveled is equal to the increase in trips for bus, bike, and walk, multiplied by their respective average trip lengths, divided by the average car occupancy. The trips that switch from car to bike will tend to be shorter, local trips. The project is expected to reduce VMT by over 1.5 million per year, and 43 million over the 30-year analysis period. This includes a small increase in bus miles resulting from increased transit ridership. Average Trip Distance and Vehicle Car N/A 1.67 Bus 7.15 10 Bike 2.38 1 Walk 0.87 1 Benefits Safety There is expected to be a significant reduction in accidents and injuries because of safety improvements along the Golden Gate Parkway corridor and some adjoining streets, including Revitalizing the Golden Gate City Community I C-2 ��`� ` a shared -use path that will separate bicyclists c) Installing sidewalks on two adjoining and pedestrians from the roadway, adding a streets: CRF of 88 percent, applied to all landscaped buffer between the shared -use path pedestrian collisions on these streets' and the roadway, resurfacing the pavement, d) Complete Streets (road diet) encouraging installing sidewalks on two adjoining streets, less aggressive driving: CRF of 29 percent, and installing and improving lighting. The applied to all vehicular collisions that GGPCS Project includes elements such as involved aggressive driving on Golden reducing vehicle lane widths, which is ex- Gate Parkway, and all collisions involving pected to deter aggressive driving and result in bicyclists or pedestrians' fewer collisions. Historical crash data from March 2013 through e) Resurfacing the pavement: CRF of March 2021 were used to estimate the average 21 percent, applied to all 9 vehicle collisions on Golden Gate Parkway annual number of collisions and injuries, dis- aggregated by severity, type and cause. The fl Improving lighting": number of crashes were assumed to increase at — Improved lighting for pedestrians: CRF a rate similar to the travel demand growth of of 42 percent applied to pedestrian 1.5 percent per year. Crash Reduction Factors crashes. (CRF) were applied to different types of accidents depending on the safety intervention — New lighting where there is currently to estimate the reduction in crashes and none: CRF 50 percent applied to injuries that could be expected in each year. nighttime vehicle crashes and CRF of This was multiplied by the dollar value 23 percent applied to daytime vehicle associated with each type of injury based on crashes. crashes. the "KABCO" injury scale, which was — Improved lighting at intersections developed by the National Safety Council'. where lighting already exists: CRF of The total present value (PV) safety benefit is 45 percent applied to nighttime vehicle estimated to be $60.2 million PV over the full crashes and CRF of 25 percent applied analysis period. to daytime vehicle crashes. The following CRFs, in terms of the perc- The following table summarizes the estimated entage decrease in accidents, were applied: change in annual injuries as a result of GGPCS Project. a) Bike path: CRF of 74 percent applied to all bike collisions on Golden Gate Parkway' b) Improved sidewalks on Golden Gate Parkway, landscape buffer of at least 4 feet: CRF of 71 percent, applied to all pedestrian collisions on Golden Gate Parkways 'http://www.cmfc[earinahouse.ora/detail.cfm?facid=4097#commen 9 http://www.cmfclearinghouse.org/detail.cfm?facid=10280 tanchor ' '0http://www.cmfcLearinghouse.ora/collateral/FHWA Desktop Refe https://safeiy.fhwa.dot.gov/ped bike/tools solve/ped tctg_epc/ rence Guide.pdf 7 https://safeiy.fhwa.dot.aov/ped bike/tools solve/ped tctg_epc/ 8https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/research/safety/ 10053/ Revitalizing the Golden Gate City Community I C-3 Accidents Avoided each Year INo Injury Change in AnnualDollars Injuries _82.3 Value 019 in Millions) $0.3M I Possible Injury I -24.2 $1.76M Non -Incapacitating -12.0 $1.71M ( Incapacitating -1.6 $0.83M Fatalities _0.2 $1.74M Total -120.3 $6.34M Vehicle Operating Costs Users benefit from reduced VMT because of a decrease in their vehicle operating costs, in- cluding gasoline, maintenance, tire wear, and depreciation. For every vehicle mile reduced, the cost savings is estimated at $0.43 for a light -duty vehicle, offset against a small increase in bus miles with an assumed cost of $0.93 per mile. The overall benefit of a net decrease in VMT is estimated at $580,000 per year, or $5.5 million PV over the full analysis period. Congestion Savings The value of congestion savings is assumed to be $0.13 per reduced vehicle mile in 2007 dollars (adjusted to $0.16 in 2019 dollars)." The total value of this benefit was estimated to be $2.1 million PV over the full analysis period. State of Good Repair Every 1 mile of VMT reduced is assumed to generate a savings of $0.14 for reduced costs of roadway maintenance. The total value of this benefit was estimated to be $1.9 million PV over the full analysis period. 11 https://www.vtpi.org/tca/tca05O5.12df _R Emissions Reduction For every vehicle mile reduced, there is a reduction in emissions of NOX> S02, PM2.5, and CO2 pollutants emitted into the atmo- sphere. This can be quantified using the following method: $ Damage Cost _ $ Damage Cost X Tons of Pollutant Vehicle Mile Ton Vehicle Mile Emissions Saving Benefit = $ Damage cost x Vehicle Mile Vehicle Miles Reduced The assumed cost per ton and the emissions per VMT for each pollutant are presented in the following table. Pollutant Types and Their Associated Damage Costs, a Benefit Cost Analysis Guidance for Discretionary Grant Programs", Table A-6 hiips://www.tranVortation.eov/sites/ dot.gov/files/2021-02Benefit°/a20Cost%20Analysis%20 Guidance%202021.ndf b Updated Emission Factors of Air Pollutants from Vehicle Operations in GREETTM Using MOVES (htips://Rreet.es.anl.gov/files/vehicles 13), Table A-2 Greenhouse Gas Emissions from a Typical Passenger Vehicle (ht_pt s://www.ppa.gov/greenvehicies/,greenhouse-gas-emissions- 13Tical-passenger-vehicle) There is an estimated saving of approximately 17,000 tons of air emissions over the full analysis period. Fewer car trips also means fewer leaking fluids entering the water table. For every 1 mile of VMT reduced, there was assumed to be a water pollution cost saving of $0.0014 in Revitalizing the Golden Gate City Community I C-4 2007 dollars (adjusted to $0.017 in 2019 dollars).' The reduction in total emissions and water pollution equates to approximately $1.3 million PV benefit over the analysis period. A discount rate of 3 percent was applied to emissions benefits, as per the BCA Guidance. Healthcare Cost Savings The shift from use of personal vehicles to active transportation is expected to lead to healthcare cost savings. Research shows the average annual health cost for inactive adults compared with active adults (at least 150 minutes of exercise per week) is approxi- mately $576 per person.13 The increase in walk and bike trips was converted to an increase in minutes spent walking or cycling divided by 150 minutes per week, and multiplied by 53 percent to obtain the equivalent number of adults moving from the inactive category to the active category (47 percent of Floridians are already considered moderately active1) The resulting estimated healthcare benefit is $8 million PV. Walkability and Journey Ambience The annual benefit of improved walkability was quantified in terms of the impact on property value. The current Walk Score of the Golden Gate City area according to WalkScore.com is 68 points. It is assumed that this will increase by an average of 2 points over the whole area. For each of the 7,100 households within Golden Gate City, it is assumed there would be a property value increase of $1,400 ($700 per 1 point increase in Walk Score) over a 25-year period (a typical 12 https://www.vtpi.ora/tca/tcaO515.pdf 13 https://www.cdc.gov/nccdphp/dnpao/docs/carlson-physical- activity-and-healthcare-expend itures-final-508tag(ied.pdf 14 https://www.cdc.gov/physicaLactivity/downloads/ pa state indicator report 2014.pdf mortgage period). The $700 assumption is based on a survey of 15 real estate markets from Jacksonville, Florida, to Stockton, California, which found that a 1-point increase in the walkability of a neighborhood as measured by WalkScore.com increased home values by $700 to $3,000.15 The benefit of improved cycling facilities was quantified using a journey ambience benefit of $0.05 per minute for a segregated cycle lane, from the UK Department for Transport appraisal guidance,16 applied to the average bike trip length in minutes. This was applied only to the baseline number of bike trips (that is, existing users - without the project). Resiliency The project is expected to reduce the risk of severe flooding by elevating the roadway by at least 1 foot and improving drainage. The flood risk and future sea level rise effects were assessed using the University of Florida GeoPlan Center's Florida Sea Level Scenario Sketch Tool for the segment of Golden Gate Parkway from I-75 to Collier Blvd. The percentage of the existing roadway that would be affected by flooding from hurricane storm surge or 100-year flood event is as follows: ■ Hurricane Category 3: 82 percent ■ Hurricane Category 4: 97 percent ■ Hurricane Category 5: 98 percent ■ 100-Year Floodplain: 33 percent The resiliency benefit of the project has been quantified as the estimated costs associated with each of these flooding events and by their expected frequency. 15 https://smartQrowthamerica.org/wp� content/up loads/2016/08/cs-econom ic.pdf 16 https://www.itf-oecd.org/sites/default/files/docs/ economicbenefits-imp roved-accessibility-transport-systems.pdf Revitalizing the Golden Gate City Community I C-5 The frequency of severe flooding is assumed to be 0.13 per year based on the fact there were 15 hurricanes of category 3, 4, or 5 within a 60-mile radius in the past 120 years. The chance that 33 percent of the roadway is flooded, per the 100-year floodplain, is 1 percent per year. The avoided cost of flooding was quantified including the cost to replace the road and the cost of increased journey times. Roadway Replacement Cost Assumptions According to Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) data, if a roadway is flooded by over 2 feet for more than 4 hours, and the roadway is designation 3 (offset but no protective infrastructure between; subject to surge/wave action, perpendicular to typical flow), the damage would be 60 percent of the total replacement cost. Therefore, the avoided roadway replacement cost was assumed to be 60 percent of $1.4 million per mile per lane, based on FDOT estimates by facility type." Time Savings It was assumed that each severe flooding event would lead to the roadway being flooded for 2 days by an average of 1 foot over that time. The maximum acceptable vehicle speed in 1 foot depth of water flood was calculated to be 1 mph, based on a depth -disruption function developed in a study of the impact of flooding on roadways. This was compared with 35 mph average speed under normal conditions to calculate the extra travel time per average trip under flooded conditions, applied to the total number of car trips in 2 days, and quantified in monetary terms using an assumed value of time of $17.90 per hour'. " https://www.fdot.gov/programmanaoement/estimates/ Ire/costperm i lemode ls/ - _4 Total Resiliency Benefit and Unquantified Benefits The total quantified benefit including avoided roadway replacement costs and value of increased journey times is estimated at $10 million PV. There are expected to be significant additional benefits that were not possible to quantify and include in the BCR: 1) Because the road will be less likely to flood, it will be useable as an evacuation route for residents and an access route for emergency services in the event of a severe flooding event, which could save lives. 2) As well as resiliency against occasional major flooding events, the drainage improve- ments and elevation of the roadway will reduce flooding that currently occurs fre- quently after heavy rainfall, thus avoiding costs of delay and inconvenience and roadway and vehicle repair. Economic Benefits There are currently almost 15,000 workers in Golden Gate City, but less than 5,000 jobs. Many local residents do not work, and many commute a significant distance to get to work. The project is expected to be a catalyst for economic revitalization of the Golden Gate Parkway corridor. By improving the street scape and making it more pedestrian friendly, it is expected that more businesses including hospitality will be attracted to the corridor, creating more jobs and local services for local residents. The impacts of more local employment opportunities has not been quantified to include in the BCR, as per the BCA Guidance, but the benefits are likely to be significant: 1) increased income for local households in an area of extreme poverty, 2) increased spending Revitalizing the Golden Gate City Community I C-6 in the local economy, 3) reduced travel times and expenses because of shorter commutes. Costs The proposed project is estimated to cost approximately $31,249,450 in initial capital construction costs over a 2-year period (2025 and 2026). Annual maintenance costs were estimated at $177,000, plus a one-off cost of $2,664,842 in year 15 for resurfacing and milling. The work zone impact (the cost of disruption and delay during construction) has been quantified as the cost of increased journey times, using an assumed value of time of $17.90 per hour.' It is assumed that during half of the construction period (in years 2025 and 2026), vehicle speeds will be reduced by 10 percent on average along project corridor, at a total cost of $1.37 million PV. Benefits and Costs Comparison The following table summarizes the yearly costs and benefits in Present Values using a 7 percent discount rate (3 percent for emissions benefits). Net Present Value by Year (2022-2051) Year 2022 Benefits 0.00 Costs 0.00 Net 0.00 umulative 0.00 2023 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2024 0.00 0.00 I 0.00 I 0.00 2025 0.00 -12.62 -12.62 -12.62 2026 0.00 -11.81 I -11.81 I -24.43 2027 6.67 -0.12 6.55 -17.88 2028 6.32 -0.11 6.21 -11.67 2029 5.98 -0.10 5.88 -5.79 2030 5.67 -0.10 I 5.57 I -0.22 2031 5.37 -0.09 5.28 5.06 2032 5.09 -0.08 5.00 L 10.06 2033 4.82 -0.08 4.74 14.80 2034 4.56 -0.07 4.49 19.29 Net Present Value by Year 2022-2051 Year � Benefits Costs Net 2035 4.32 -0.07 4.25 Cumulative 23.55 2036 4.10 -0.06 4.03 27.58 2037 3.88 -0.06 3.82 31.40 2038 3.68 -0.06 3.62 35.02 2039 3.48 I -0.05 3.43 38.45 2040 3.30 -0.05 3.25 41.71 2041 3.13 -0.73 2.40 44.10 2042 2.97 I -0.04 2.92 47.02 2043 2.81 -0.04 2.77 49.79 2044 2.66 -0.04 2.63 52.42 2045 2.53 I -0.03 2.49 54.91 2046 2.39 -0.03 2.36 57.27 2047 2.27 I -0.03 2.24 59.51 2048 2.15 -0.03 2.12 61.64 2049 2.04 -0.03 2.01 63.65 2050 1.93 -0.02 1.91 65.56 2051 1.83 -0.02 1.81 67.37 Revitalizing the Golden Gate City Community I C-7 Benefit -Cost Ratio -4 The following table presents the total project benefits and costs and the estimated BCR. Benefit -Cost Analysis Results Summary of Return on Investment PeriodSummary 30-Year Evaluation Benefit -Cost Ratio I 3.5:1 Project Net Present Value Benefits $67,374,000 I Safety Reduced Fatalities, Injuries, and $60,180,000 Collision Cost Savings State of Good Repair IRoadway Maintenance Cost $1,901,000 Savings Economic Competitiveness IHousehold Vehicle Operation $5,502,000 Cost Savings Traffic Congestion Cost Savings $2,142,000 Environmental Sustainability IReduced Emissions and Water $1,344,000 Pollution Resiliency $10,461,000 Quality of Life Healthcare Cost Savings for $8,021,000 Increased Active Travel IWalkability and Journey I $4,411,000 Ambience Total Benefits (NPV) $93,962,000 Capital Costs $23,060,000 Maintenance Costs $2,155,000 Work Zone Impact $1,372,000 Total Costs (NPV) $26,588,000 Revitalizing the Golden Gate City Community I C-8 TMAI P\/ Present Value Benefits 94.0 Present Value Costs 26.6 Net Present Value NPV of Project 67.4 BCR 3.5 Total PV 2027 Annual Reduced VMT 42,968,000 1,429,000 Benefits Reduced Fatalities and Injuries $60,180,000 $6,336,000 63% Reduced Vehicle Operating Costs $5,502,000 $579,000 6% Reduced Emissions and Water Pollution $1,344,000 $69,000 1% Health benefits of active modes $8,021,000 $844,000 8% Congestion savings $2,142,000 $226,000 2% State of repair $1,901,000 $200,000 2% Walkability and Bike Journey Ambience $4,411,000 $531,000 5% Resilience - Hurricane Flooding $10,461,000 $1,208,000 12% $ 93,961,737 1 L 4 E E 7 E C 1C 11 12 13 14 1E 1E 17 1E 1E 2C 21 22 23 24 2E 2E 27 2E 2C 3C Year Benefits Costs Net Cumulative 2022 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2023 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2024 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2025 0.00 -12.62 -12.62 -12.62 2026 0.00 -11.81 -11.81 -24.43 2027 6.67 -0.12 6.55 -17.88 2028 6.32 -0.11 6.21 -11.67 2029 5.98 -0.10 5.88 -5.79 2030 5.67 -0.10 5.57 -0.22 2031 5.37 -0.09 5.28 5.06 2032 5.09 -0.08 5.00 10.06 2033 4.82 -0.08 1 4.74 14.80 2034 4.56 -0.07 4.49 19.29 2035 4.32 -0.07 4.25 23.55 2036 4.10 -0.06 4.03 27.58 2037 3.88 -0.06 3.82 31.40 2038 3.68 -0.06 3.62 35.02 2039 3.48 -0.05 1 3.43 38.45 2040 3.30 -0.05 3.25 41.71 2041 3.13 -0.73 2.40 44.10 2042 2.97 -0.04 2.92 47.02 2043 2.81 -0.04 2.77 49.79 2044 2.66 -0.04 2.63 52.42 2045 2.53 -0.03 2.49 54.91 2046 2.39 -0.03 2.36 57.27 2047 2.27 -0.03 2.24 59.51 2048 2.15 -0.03 2.12 61.64 2049 2.04 -0.03 2.01 63.65 2050 1.93 -0.02 1.91 65.56 2051 1.83 -0.02 1.81 67.37 Total 93.96 -26.59 67.37 67.374 Check 93.96 -26.59 67.374 AL chxk Benefits Discounted(30 Yr) 0K Safety Benefits $ 60,180,115 oK Vehicle Operating Cost Savings $ 5,502,020 0K Emissions Benefits $ 1344,104 OK Healthcare cost savings $ 8:020,798 0K Congestion savings $ 2,142,232 oK State of Good Repair $ 1,900,502 0K Walkability and Journey Ambience Benefits $ 4,410,983 0K Resilience Benefits (Hurricane & Flooding) $ 10,460,983 Total Benefits $ 93,961,737 Costs Program Cost $ 23,010,241 Work Zone Impacts $ 1,372,335 Maintenance Cost $ 2,'55,478 Total Costs ($M) $ 26,588,054 Discount Factor 7% Discount Factor 3% NPV Calculation 30 Year Present Value Benefits 94.0 Present Value Costs 26.6 Net Present Value (NPV) of Project 67.4 BCR 3.5 Benefits except emissions Benefits except emissions discounted Emissions discounted Costs discounted Annual Demand (Baseline) Car Bus Bike Walk Total Traffic Annual Demand (New Project) Car Bus Bike Walk Total Traffic Change in Demand Car (44,521,816) Bus 2,968,125 Bike 11,872,500 Walk 29,681,251 Total Traffic 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 5 i $6,336,208 $6,431,251 $6,527,720 $6,625,636 $6,725,020 579,293 587,983 596,803 605,755 614,841 69,210 70,987 72,804 74,678 76,411 844,489 857,156 870,014 883,064 896,310 225,550 228,933 232,367 235,853 239,391 200,099 203,100 206,147 209,239 212,378 530,878 530,878 530,878 530,878 530,878 1,207,980 1,213,330 1,218,760 1,224,272 1,229,866 $0 $0 $9,993,708 $10,123,619 $10,255,493 $10,389,374 $10,525,095 $15,624,7251 $15,624,725 $ 923,151 $ 936,999 176,539 176,539 176,539 176,539 176,539 $16,547,876 $16,561,724 $276,539 $176,539 $176,539 $176,539 $176,539 1.00 0.93 0.87 0.82 0.76 0.71 0.67 0.62 0.58 0.54 0.51 1.00 0.97 0.94 0.92 0.89 0.86 0.84 0.81 0.79 0.77 0.74 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $9,924,497 $10,052,632 $10,182,689 $10,314,696 $10,448,684 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $6,613,112 $6,260,274 $5,926,418 $5,610,511 $5,311,581 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $57,963 $57,719 $57,472 $57,234 $56,857 $0 $0 $0 $0 $12,624,296 $11,808,280 $117,635 $109,939 $102,747 $96,025 $89,743 16,815,162 17,067,390 17,323,400 17,583,251 17,947,000 18,114,705 18,386,426 18,662,222 18,942,156 19,226,288 19,514,682 90,293 91,647 93,022 94,417 95,834 97,271 98,730 100,211 101,714 103,240 104,789 167,222 169,731 172,277 174,861 177,484 180,146 182,848 185,591 188,375 191,200 194,068 985,889 1,000,678 1,015,688 1,030,923 1,046,387 1,062,083 1,078,014 1,094,184 1,110,597 1,127,256 1,144,165 18,058,567 18,329,445 18,604,387 18,883,453 19,166,705 19,454,205 19,746,018 20,042,208 20,342,842 20,647,984 20,957,704 15,460,770 15,692,681 15,928,071 16,166,993 16,409,497 16,655,640 16,905,474 17,159,057 17,416,442 17,677,689 17,942,854 180,586 183,294 186,044 188,835 191,667 194,542 197,460 200,422 203,428 206,480 209,577 528,394 536,320 544,364 552,530 560,818 569,230 577,768 586,435 595,232 604,160 613,222 1,888,818 1,917,150 1,945,907 1,975,096 2,004,722 2,034,793 2,065,315 2,096,295 2,127,739 2,159,655 2,192,050 18,058,567 18,329,445 18,604,387 18,883,453 19,166,705 19,454,205 19,746,018 20,042,208 20,342,842 20,647,984 20,957,704 (1,480,951) (1,503,166) (1,525,713) (1,548,599) (1,571,828) 98,730 100,211 101,714 103,240 104,789 394,920 400,844 406,857 412,960 419,154 987,301 1,002,110 1,017,142 1,032,399 1,047,885 Change in Person Miles Travelled Car (75,301,333) (2,504,782) (2,542,354) (2,580,489) (2,619,197) (2,658,485) Bus 21,222,094 705,920 716,509 727,257 738,165 749,238 Bike 28,256,551 939,910 954,009 968,319 982,844 997,587 Walk 25,822,688 858,952 871,836 894,914 898,187 911,660 Total Traffic - - - - - Change in Vehicle Miles Travelled (VMT) Car (45,090,618) (1,499,870) (1,522,368) (1,545,203) (1,568,381) (1,591,907) Bus 2,122,209 70,592 71,651 72,726 73,817 74,924 Bike 28,256,551 939,910 954,009 968,319 982,944 997,587 Walk 25,822,688 858,952 871,836 894,914 898,187 911,660 Total Traffic 369,585 375,128 380,755 386,467 392,264 Change in VMT (42,968,409) - (1,429,278) (1,450,717) (1,472,478) (1,494,565) (1,516,983) Vehicle Operating Cost Savings VOC Benefits $ - Existing Users Car $ 644,944 $ 654,618 $ 664,437 $ 674,404 $ 684,520 Bus (65,651) (66,635) (67,635) (68,649) (69,679) Bike Walk Total 579,293 587,983 596,803 605,755 614,841 VOC Benefits $ - New Users Car $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Bus Bike Walk Total - - - - - 30 Year PV Total VOC Savings $ 5,502,020 579,293 587,983 596,803 605,755 614,841 Water Pollution Reduction Benefit Car $ 25,490 $ 25,872 $ 26,260 $ 26,654 $ 27,054 Bus $ (1,200) $ (1,218) $ (1,236) $ (1,254) $ (1,273) Bike Walk 30 Year PV Total $ 428,862 $ 24,290 $ 24,654 $ 25,024 $ 25,400 $ 25,781 Air Emissions (Tons) Car 606.14 615.24 624.46 633.83 643.34 Bus (29) (29) (29) (30) (30) Bike - - - - - Walk Total Emissions Savings (Tons) 17,365 578 586 595 604 613 Air Emissions Benefits $ Car $ 47,139 $ 48,622 $ 50,140 $ 51,712 $ 53,131 Bus $ (2,219) $ (2,288) $ (2,360) $ (2,434) $ (2,501) Bike $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Walk 30 Year PV $ $ $ $ $ Total Emissions Savings $ 915,243 $ 44,920 $ 46,333 $ 47,780 $ 49,278 $ 50,630 All Emissions Benefits $ Car $ 72,629 $ 74,494 $ 76,400 $ 78,366 $ 80,185 Bus $ (3,418) $ (3,506) $ (3,596) $ (3,688) $ (3,774) Bike Walk 30 Year PV Total Emissions Savings $ 1,344,104 $ 69,210 $ 70,987 $ 72,804 $ 74,678 $ 76,411 Annual Accidents (Baseline) 30 Year No Injury 4,607 153.3 153.25 155.55 157.88 160.25 162.65 Possible Injury 1,308 43.5 43.50 44.15 44.81 45.49 46.17 Non Incapacitating 628 20.9 20.88 21.19 21.51 21.83 22.16 Incapacitating 75 2.5 2.50 2.54 2.58 2.61 2.65 Killed 8 0.3 0.25 0.25 0.26 0.26 0.27 Injured (severity unknown) - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total Accidents 6,625 220.4 223.7 227.0 230.4 233.9 Annual Accidents(New Project) No Injury 2,134 71.0 70.98 72.04 73.12 74.22 75.33 Possible Injury 579 19.3 19.26 19.55 19.84 20.14 20.44 Non Incapacitating 265 8.8 8.83 8.96 9.09 9.23 9.37 Incapacitating 27 0.9 0.91 0.92 0.94 0.95 0.97 Killed 3 0.1 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.10 Injured (severity unknown) - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total Accidents 3,008 100.07 101.57 103.09 104.64 106.21 Change in Incidents No Injury (2,473) -82.3 -83.51 -84.76 -86.03 -87.32 Possible Injury (729) -24.2 -24.60 -24.97 -25.34 -25.72 Non Incapacitating (362) -12.0 -12.23 -12.41 -12.60 -12.79 Incapacitating (48) -1.6 -1.61 -1.64 -1.66 -1.69 Killed (5) -0.2 -0.16 -0.16 -0.17 -0.17 Injured (severity unknown) - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total Accidents (3,617) -120.31 -122.11 -123.94 -125.80 -127.69 Value of a Statistical Life (VSL) Benefits $ No Injury $304,404 $308,970 $313,605 $318,309 $323,084 Possible Injury $1,757,220 $1,783,578 $1,810,332 $1,837,487 $1,865,049 Non Incapacitating $1,711,005 $1,736,670 $1,762,720 $1,789,161 $1,815,998 Incapacitating $828,300 $840,725 $853,336 $866,136 $879,128 Killed $1,735,279 $1,761,308 $1,787,727 $1,814,543 $1,941,761 Injured (severity unknown) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total VSL Benefits $6,336,208 $6,431,251 $6,527,720 $6,625,636 $6,725,020 30 Year PV Safety Benefits Total $ 60,180,115 $6,336,208 $6,431,251 $6,527,720 $6,625,636 $6,725,020 30 Year PV Congestion Savings $ 2,142,232 $ 225,550 $ 228,933 $ 232,367 $ 235,853 $ 239,391 State of Good Repair $ 1,900,502 $ 200,099 $ 203,100 $ 206,147 $ 209,239 $ 212,378 Healthcare cost savings $ 8,020,798 $ 844,489 $ 857,156 $ 870,014 $ 883,064 $ 896,310 Mobility Benefits Walkability $ 398,104 $ 398,104 $ 398,104 $ 398,104 $ 398,104 $ 398,104 Cycling mobility $ 132,774 $ 132,774 $ 132,774 $ 132,774 $ 132,774 $ 132,774 Total $ 4,430,983 $ 530,878 $ 530,878 $ 530,878 $ 530,878 $ 530,878 Hurricane and 100-year flood Time Savings Benefits $ Car $ 351,288 $ 356,557 $ 361,906 $ 367,334 $ 372,844 Bus $ 1,886 $ 1,915 $ 1,943 $ 1,972 $ 2,002 Bike $ 3,493 $ 3,546 $ 3,599 $ 3,653 $ 3,708 Walk Total $ 356,668 $ 362,018 $ 367,448 $ 372,960 $ 378,554 Roadway reconstruction benefits $ 851,312 $ 851,312 $ 851,312 $ 851,312 $ 851,312 $ 851,312 Resilience Benefits Total $ 10,460,983 $ 1,207,980 $ 1,213,330 $ 1,218,760 $ 1,224,272 $ 1,229,866 Benefits Safety Benefits Vehicle Operating Cost Savings Emissions Benefits Healthcare cost savings Congestion savings State of Good Repair Walkability and Journey Ambience Benefits Resilience Benefits (Hurricane & Flooding) Total Benefits Discounted (30 yr) $ 60,180,115 $ 5,502,020 $ 1,344,104 $ 8,020,798 $ 2,142,232 $ 1,900,502 $ 4,410,983 $ 10,460,983 $ 93,961,737 Costs Program Cost $ 23,060,241 Work Zone Impacts $ 1,372,335 Maintenance Cost $ 2,155,478 Total Costs ($M) $ 26,588,054 Discount Factor 7% Discount Factor 3% NPV Calculation 30 year Present Value Benefits 94.0 Present Value Costs 26.6 Net Present Value (NPV) of Project 67.4 BCR 3.5 Benefits except emissions Benefits except emissions discounted Emissions discounted Costs discounted 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037 2038 2039 2040 2041 2042 2043 2044 1 2045 2046 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 $6,825,896 $6,928,284 $7,032,208 $7,137,692 $7,244,757 $7,353,428 $7,463,730 $7,575,686 $7,689,321 $7,804,661 $7,921,731 $8,040,557 $8,161,165 $8,283,582 $8,407,836 624,064 633,424 642,926 652,570 662,358 672,294 682,378 692,614 703,003 713,548 724,251 735,115 746,142 757,334 768,694 78,179 79,983 81,824 83,702 85,617 87,572 89,566 91,599 93,674 95,791 97,949 100,151 102,397 104,688 107,025 909,754 923,401 937,252 951,311 965,580 980,064 994,765 1,009,686 1,024,832 1,040,204 1,055,807 1,071,644 1,087,719 1,104,035 1,120,595 242,981 246,626 250,326 254,080 257,892 261,760 265,686 269,672 273,717 277,823 281,990 286,220 290,513 294,871 299,294 215,563 218,797 222,079 225,410 228,791 232,223 235,706 239,242 242,830 246,473 250,170 253,923 257,731 261,597 265,521 530,878 530,878 530,878 530,878 530,878 530,878 530,878 530,878 530,878 530,878 530,878 530,878 530,878 530,878 530,878 1,235,545 1,241,308 1,247,158 1,253,096 1,259,123 1,265,240 1,271,449 1,277,751 1,284,147 1,290,640 1,297,230 1,303,918 1,310,708 1,317,598 1,324,593 $10,662,860 $10,802,702 $10,944,650 $11,098,738 $11,234,996 $11,383,458 $11,534,158 $11,687,127 $11,942,402 $12,000,017 $12,160,006 $12,322,406 $12,487,253 $12,654,584 $12,824,436 176,539 176,539 176,539 176,539 176,539 176,539 176,539 176,539 176,539 2,941,380 176,539 176,539 176,539 176,539 176,539 $176,539 $176,539 $176,539 $176,539 $176,539 $176,539 $176,539 $176,539 $176,539 $2,841,380 $176,539 $176,539 $176,539 $176,539 $176,539 0.20 0.18 0.49 0.48 $10,584,681 $10,722,718 $10,862,826 $11,005,036 $11,149,379 $11,295,886 $11,444,592 $11,595,528 $11,748,728 $11,904,226 $12,062,057 $12,222,255 $12,384,856 $12,549,896 $12,717,411 $5,028,706 $4,761,015 $4,507,687 $4,267,943 $4,041,048 $3,826,308 $3,623,065 $3,430,698 $3,248,621 $3,076,278 $2,913,145 $2,758,724 $2,612,547 $2,474,169 $2,343,173 $56,478 $56,099 $55,718 $55,337 $54,955 $54,572 $54,189 $53,805 $53,421 $53,037 $52,653 $52,268 $51,884 $51,500 $51,116 $83,872 $78,385 $73,257 $68,465 $63,986 $59,800 $55,888 $52,231 $48,814 $734,267 $42,636 $39,847 $37,240 $34,804 $32,527 Annual Demand (Baseline) Car 19,807,402 20,104,513 20,406,081 20,712,172 21,022,855 21,338,198 21,658,271 21,983,145 22,312,892 22,647,585 22,987,299 23,332,109 23,682,090 24,037,322 24,397,881 Bus 106,360 107,956 109,575 111,219 112,887 114,580 116,299 118,043 119,814 121,611 123,436 125,287 127,166 129,074 131,010 Bike 196,979 199,934 202,933 205,977 209,067 212,203 215,386 218,617 221,896 225,224 228,603 232,032 235,512 239,045 242,630 Walk 1,161,327 1,178,747 1,196,428 1,214,375 1,232,591 1,251,079 1,269,846 1,288,893 1,308,227 1,327,850 1,347,768 1,367,984 1,388,504 1,409,332 1,430,472 Total Traffic 21,272,070 21,591,151 21,915,018 22,243,743 22,577,399 22,916,060 23,259,801 23,608,698 23,962,829 24,322,271 24,687,105 25,057,412 25,433,273 25,814,772 26,201,994 Annual Demand (New Project) Car 18,211,997 18,485,177 18,762,455 19,043,892 19,329,550 19,619,493 19,913,786 20,212,492 20,515,680 20,823,415 21,135,766 21,452,803 21,774,595 22,101,214 22,432,732 Bus 212,721 215,912 219,150 222,437 225,774 229,161 232,598 236,087 239,628 243,223 246,871 250,574 254,333 258,148 262,020 Bike 622,421 631,757 641,233 650,852 660,615 670,524 680,582 690,791 701,152 711,670 722,345 733,180 744,178 755,340 766,670 Walk 2,224,931 2,258,305 2,292,179 2,326,562 2,361,460 2,396,882 2,432,836 2,469,328 2,506,368 2,543,964 2,582,123 2,620,855 2,660,168 2,700,070 2,740,571 Total Traffic 21,272,070 21,591,151 21,915,018 22,243,743 22,577,399 22,916,060 23,259,801 23,608,698 23,962,829 24,322,271 24,687,105 25,057,412 25,433,273 25,814,772 26,201,994 Change in Demand Car (44,521,876) (1,595,405) (1,619,336) (1,643,626) (1,668,281) (1,693,305) (1,718,705) (1,744,485) (1,770,652) (1,797,212) (1,824,170) (1,851,533) (1,879,306) (1,907,495) (1,936,108) (1,965,150) Bus 2,968,125 106,360 107,956 109,575 111,219 112,887 114,580 116,299 118,043 119,814 121,611 123,436 125,287 127,166 129,074 131,010 Bike 11,872,500 425,441 431,823 438,300 444,875 451,548 458,321 465,196 472,174 479,257 486,445 493,742 501,148 508,665 516,295 524,040 Walk 29,681,251 1,063,603 1,079,558 1,095,751 1,112,187 1,128,870 1,145,803 1,162,990 1,180,435 1,198,141 1,216,114 1,234,355 1,252,871 1,271,664 1,290,739 1,310,100 Total Traffic - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Change in Person Mlles Travelled Car (75,301,333) (2,698,362) (2,738,837) (2,779,920) (2,821,619) (2,863,943) (2,906,902) (2,950,506) (2,994,763) (3,039,685) (3,085,280) (3,131,559) (3,178,533) (3,226,211) (3,274,604) (3,323,723) Bus 21,222,094 760,476 771,894 783,462 795,214 807,142 819,249 831,538 844,011 856,671 869,521 882,564 895,802 909,240 922,878 936,721 Bike 28,256,551 1,012,551 1,027,739 1,043,155 1,058,802 1,074,684 1,090,804 1,107,167 1,123,774 1,140,631 1,157,740 1,175,106 1,192,733 1,210,624 1,228,783 1,247,215 Walk 25,822,688 925,335 939,215 953,303 967,603 982,117 996,849 1,011,801 1,026,978 1,042,383 1,058,019 1,073,889 1,089,997 1,106,347 1,122,943 1,139,787 Total Traffic - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Change in Vehicle Miles Travelled (VMT) Car (45,090,618) (1,615,786) (1,640,022) (1,664,623) (1,689,592) (1,714,936) (1,740,660) (1,766,770) (1,793,271) (1,820,171) (1,847,473) (1,875,185) (1,903,313) (1,931,863) (1,960,841) (1,990,253) Bus 2,122,209 76,048 77,188 78,346 79,521 80,714 81,925 83,154 84,401 85,667 86,952 88,256 89,580 90,924 92,288 93,672 Bike 28,256,551 1,012,551 1,027,739 1,043,155 1,058,802 1,074,684 1,090,804 1,107,167 1,123,774 1,140,631 1,157,740 1,175,106 1,192,733 1,210,624 1,228,783 1,247,215 Walk 25,822,688 925,335 939,215 953,303 967,603 982,117 996,849 1,011,801 1,026,978 1,042,383 1,058,019 1,073,889 1,089,997 1,106,347 1,122,943 1,139,787 Total Traffic 398,148 404,120 410,182 416,334 422,579 428,918 435,352 441,882 448,510 455,238 462,066 468,997 476,032 1 483,173 490,421 Change in VMT 142,968,409) - (1,539,738) (1,562,834) (1,586,277) (1,610,071) (1,634,222) (1,658,735) (1,683,616) (1,708,870) (1,734,503) (1,760,521) (1,786,929) (1,813,733) (1,840,939) (1,868,553) (1,896,581) VOC Benefits $ - Existing Users Car $ 694,788 $ 705,210 $ 715,788 $ 726,525 $ 737,422 $ 748,484 $ 759,711 $ 771,107 $ 782,673 $ 794,413 $ 806,330 $ 818,425 $ 830,701 $ 843,161 $ 855,809 Bus (70,724) (71,785) (72,862) (73,955) (75,064) (76,190) (77,333) (78,493) (79,670) (80,865) (82,078) (83,310) (84,559) (85,828) (87,115) Bike Walk Total 624,064 633,424 642,926 652,570 662,358 672,294 682,378 692,614 703,003 713,548 724,251 735,115 746,142 757,334 768,694 VOC Benefits $ - New Users Car - Bus Bike Walk Total - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Total VOC Savings 30 Year PV $ 5,502,020 624,064 633,424 642,926 652,570 662,358 672,294 682,379 692,614 703,003 713,548 724,251 735,115 746,142 ' 757,334 768,694y Emissions Benefits i Water Pollution Reduction Benefit Car $ 27,460 $ 27,872 $ 28,290 $ 28,714 $ 29,145 $ 29,582 $ 30,026 $ 30,476 $ 30,933 $ 31,397 $ 31,868 $ 32,346 $ 32,831 $ 33,324 $ 33,824 Bus $ (1,292) $ (1,312) $ (1,331) $ (1,351) $ (1,372) $ (1,392) $ (1,413) $ (1,434) $ (1,456) $ (1,478) $ (1,500) $ (1,522) $ (1,545) $ (1,568) $ (1,592) Bike Walk 30 Year PV Total $ 428,862 $ 26,167 $ 26,560 $ 26,958 $ 27,363 $ 27,773 $ 28,190 $ 28,612 $ 29,042 $ 29A77 $ 29,919 $ 30,368 $ 30,824 $ 31,286 $ 31,755 $ 32,232 Air Emissions (Tons) Car 652.99 662.78 672.73 682.82 693.06 703.45 714.01 724.72 735.59 746.62 757.82 769.19 780.73 792.44 804.32 Bus (31) (31) (32) (32) (33) (33) (34) (34) (35) (35) (36) (36) (37) (37) (38) Bike Walk Total Emissions Savings (Tons) 17,365 622 632 641 651 660 670 680 691 701 711 722 733 71 755 766 Air Emissions Benefits $ Car $ 54,581 $ 56,062 $ 57,576 $ 59,122 $ 60,701 $ 62,315 $ 63,964 $ 65,648 $ 67,368 $ 69,125 $ 70,919 $ 72,752 $ 74,623 $ 76,535 $ 78,487 Bus $ (2,569) $ (2,639) $ (2,710) $ (2,783) $ (2,857) $ (2,933) $ (3,010) $ (3,090) $ (3,171) $ (3,253) $ (3,338) $ (3,424) $ (3,512) $ (3,602) $ (3,694) Bike $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $- Walk 30 Year PV $ _ $ _ $ _ $ _ $ _ $ _ $ _ $ _ $ _ $ _ $ _ $ _ $ _ $ _ $ _ Total Emissions Savings $ 915,243 $ 52,012 $ 53A24 $ 54,866 $ 56,339 $ 57,844 $ 59,382 $ 60,953 $ 62,558 $ 64,197 $ 65,871 $ 67,581 $ 69,328 $ 71,111 $ 72,933 $ 74,793 All Emissions Benefits $ Car $ 82,040 $ 83,934 $ 85,865 $ 87,836 $ 89,846 $ 91,897 $ 93,989 $ 96,124 $ 98,301 $ 100,522 $ 102,787 $ 105,098 $ 107,455 $ 109,859 $ 112,311 Bus $ (3,861) $ (3,950) $ (4,041) $ (4,134) $ (4,229) $ (4,325) $ (4,424) $ (4,524) $ (4,627) $ (4,731) $ (4,838) $ (4,946) $ (5,057) $ (5,171) $ (5,286) Bike Walk 30 Year PV Total Emissions Savings $ 1,344,104 $ 78,179 $ 79,983 $ 81,824 $ 83,702 $ 85,617 $ 87,572 $ 89,566 $ 91,599 $ 93,674 $ 95,791 $ 97,949 $ 100,151 $ 102,397 $ 104,688 $ 107,025 Annual Accidents (Baseline) 30 Year No Injury 4,607 153.3 165.09 167.57 170.08 172.63 175.22 177.85 180.52 183.23 185.98 188.77 191.60 194.47 197.39 200.35 203.36 Possible Injury 1,308 43.5 46.86 47.56 48.28 49.00 49.74 50.48 51.24 52.01 52.79 53.58 54.39 55.20 56.03 56.87 57.72 Non Incapacitating 628 20.9 22.49 22.83 23.17 23.52 23.87 24.23 24.59 24.96 25.33 25.71 26.10 26.49 26.89 27.29 27.70 Incapacitating 75 2.5 2.69 2.73 2.77 2.82 2.86 2.90 2.94 2.99 3.03 3.08 3.13 3.17 3.22 3.27 3.32 Killed 8 0.3 0.27 0.27 0.28 0.28 0.29 0.29 0.29 0.30 0.30 0.31 0.31 0.32 0.32 0.33 0.33 Injured (severity unknown) - 0_00 0_00 0_00 0_00 0_00 0_00 0.00 0_00 0_00 0.00 0_00 0.00 0_00 0.00 0.00 Total Accidents 6,625 237.4 241.0 244.6 248.3 252.0 255.8 259.6 263.5 267.4 271.4 275.5 279.7 283.8 288.1 292.4 Annual Accidents(New Project) No Injury 2,134 71.0 76.46 77.61 78.78 79.96 81.16 82.37 83.61 84.86 86.14 87.43 88.74 90.07 91.42 92.79 94.19 Possible Injury 579 19.3 20.75 21.06 21.38 21.70 22.02 22.35 22.69 23.03 23.38 23.73 24.08 24.44 24.81 25.18 25.56 Non Incapacitating 265 8.8 9.51 9.65 9.80 9.94 10.09 10.24 10.40 10.55 10.71 10.87 11.03 11.20 11.37 11.54 11.71 Incapacitating 27 0.9 0.98 1.00 1.01 1.03 1.04 1.06 1.07 1.09 1.11 1.12 1.14 1.16 1.17 1.19 1.21 Killed 3 0.1 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.12 0.12 0.12 0.12 Injured (severity unknown) - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total Accidents 3,008 107.80 109.42 121.06 112.73 114.42 116.13 117.88 119.64 121.44 123.26 125.11 126.99 128.89 130.82 132.79 Change in Incidents No Injury (2,473) -88.63 -89.96 -91.31 -92.68 -94.07 -95.48 -96.91 -98.37 -99.84 -101.34 -102.86 .104.40 -105.97 -107.56 -109.17 Possible Injury (729) -26.11 -26.50 -26.90 -27.30 -27.71 -28.13 -28.55 -28.98 -29.41 -29.85 -30.30 -30.76 -31.22 -31.69 -32.16 Non Incapacitating (362) -12.98 -13.18 -13.37 -13.57 -13.78 -13.98 -14.19 -14.41 -14.62 -14.84 -15.06 -15.29 -15.52 -15.75 -15.99 Incapacitating (48) -1.71 -1.74 -1.76 -1.79 -1.82 -1.84 -1.87 -1.90 -1.93 -1.96 -1.99 .2.02 -2.05 -2.08 -2.11 Killed (5) -0.17 -0.17 -0.18 -0.18 -0.18 -0.18 -0.19 -0.19 -0.19 -0.20 -0.20 .0.20 -0.21 -0.21 -0.21 Injured (severity unknown) - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total Accidents 3,617) -129.60 -131.55 -133.52 -135.52 -137.56 -139.62 -141.71 -143.94 -146.00 -148.19 -150.41 .152.67 -154.96 -157.28 -159.64 Value of a Statistical Life (VSL) Benefits $ No Injury $327,930 $332,849 $337,842 $342,909 $348,053 $353,274 $358,573 $363,951 $369,411 $374,952 $380,576 $386,285 $392,079 $397,960 $403,930 Possible Injury $1,893,025 $1,921,420 $1,950,242 $1,979,495 $2,009,188 $2,039,325 $2,069,915 $2,100,964 $2,132,479 $2,164,466 $2,196,933 $2,229,887 $2,263,335 $2,297,285 $2,331,744 Non Incapacitating $1,943,238 $1,870,887 $1,898,950 $1,927,434 $1,956,346 $1,985,691 $2,015,476 $2,045,709 $2,076,394 $2,107,540 $2,139,153 $2,171,241 $2,203,809 $2,236,866 $2,270,419 Incapacitating $892,315 $905,699 $919,285 $933,074 $947,070 $961,276 $975,696 $990,331 $1,005,186 $1,020,264 $1,035,568 $1,051,101 $1,066,868 $1,082,871 $1,099,114 Killed $1,869,388 $1,897,429 $1,925,890 $1,954,779 $1,984,100 $2,013,862 $2,044,070 $2,074,731 $2,105,852 $2,137,439 $2,169,501 $2,202,044 $2,235,074 $2,268,600 $2,302,629 Injured (severity unknown) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total VSL Benefits $6,825,896 $6,928,284 $7,032,208 $7,137,692 $7,244,757 $7,353,428 $7,463,730 $7,575,686 $7,689,321 $7,804,661 $7,921,731 $8,040,557 $8,161,165 $8,283,582 $8,407,836 30 Year PV Safety Benefits Total $ 60,180,115 $6,825,896 $6,928,284 $7,032,208 $7,137,692 $7,244,757 $7,353,428 $7,463,730 $7,575,686 $7,689,321 $7,804,661 $7,921,731 $8,040,557 $8,161,165 $8,283,582 $8,407,836 Other Benefits 30 Year PV Congestion Savings $ 2,142,232 $ 242,981 $ 246,626 $ 250,326 $ 254,080 $ 257,892 $ 261,760 $ 265,686 $ 269,672 $ 273,717 $ 277,823 $ 281,990 $ 286,220 $ 290,513 $ 294,871 $ 299,294 State of Good Repair $ 1,900,502 $ 215,563 $ 218,797 $ 222,079 $ 225,410 $ 228,791 $ 232,223 $ 235,706 $ 239,242 $ 242,830 $ 246,473 $ 250,170 $ 253,923 $ 257,731 $ 261,597 $ 265,521 Healthcare cost savings $ 8,020,798 $ 909,754 $ 923,401 $ 937,252 $ 951,311 $ 965,580 $ 980,064 $ 994,765 $ 1,009,686 $ 1,024,832 $ 1,040,204 $ 1,055,807 $ 1,071,644 $ 1,087,719 $ 1,104,035 $ 1,120,595 Mobility Benefits Walkability $ 398,104 $ 398,104 $ 398,104 $ 398,104 $ 398,104 $ 398,104 $ 398,104 $ 398,104 $ 398,104 $ 398,104 $ 398,104 $ 398,104 $ 398,104 $ 398,104 $ 398,104 $ 398,104 Cycling mobility, $ 132,774 $ 132,774 $ 132,774 $ 132,774 $ 132,774 $ 132,774 $ 132,774 $ 132,774 $ 132,774 $ 132,774 $ 132,774 $ 132,774 $ 132,774 $ 132,774 $ 132,774 $ 132,774 Total $ 4,410,983 $ 530,878 $ 530,878 $ 530,878 $ 530,878 $ 530,878 $ 530,878 $ 530,878 $ 530,878 $ 530,878 $ 530,878 $ 530,878 $ 530,878 $ 530,878 $ 530,878 $ 530,878 Resilience Benefits (Hurricane 8, Flooding Risk) Hurricane and 100-year flood Time Savings Benefits $ Car $ 378,437 $ 384,114 $ 389,875 $ 395,723 $ 401,659 $ 407,694 $ 413,799 $ 420,006 $ 426,307 $ 432,701 $ 439,192 $ 445,780 $ 452,466 $ 459,253 $ 466,142 Bus $ 2,032 $ 2,063 $ 2,094 $ 2,125 $ 2,157 $ 2,189 $ 2,222 $ 2,255 $ 2,289 $ 2,323 $ 2,358 $ 2,394 $ 2,430 $ 2,466 $ 2,503 Bike $ 3,763 $ 3,820 $ 3,877 $ 3,935 $ 3,994 $ 4,054 $ 4,115 $ 4,177 $ 4,240 $ 4,303 $ 4,368 $ 4,433 $ 4,500 $ 4,567 $ 4,636 Walk Total $ 394,233 $ 389,996 $ 395,846 $ 401,794 $ 407,811 $ 413,928 $ 420,137 $ 426,439 $ 432,835 $ 439,328 $ 445,918 $ 452,606 $ 459,396 $ 466,286 $ 473,281 Roadway reconstruction benefits $ 851,312 $ 851,312 $ 851,312 $ 851,312 $ 851,312 $ 851,312 $ 851,312 $ 851,312 $ 851,312 $ 851,312 $ 851,312 $ 851,312 $ 851,312 $ 851,312 $ 851,312 $ 851,312 Resilience Benefits Total $ 10,460,983 $ 1,235,545 $ 1,241,308 $ 1,247,158 $ 1,253,096 $ 1,259,123 $ 1,265,240 $ 1,271,449 $ 1,277,751 $ 1,284,147 $ 1,290,640 $ 1,297,230 $ 1,303,918 $ 1,310,708 $ 1,317,598 $ 1,324,593 Benefits Safety Benefits Vehicle Operating Cost Savings Emissions Benefits Healthcare cost savings Congestion savings State of Good Repair Walkability and Journey Ambience Benefits Resilience Benefits (Hurricane & Flooding) Total Benefits 2047 2048 2049 2050 2051 2052 2053 2054 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Discounted (30 yr) $ 60,180,115 $8,533,954 $8,661,963 $8,791,892 $8,923,771 $9,057,627 $9,193,492 $9,331,394 $9,471,365 $ 5,502,020 780,224 791,928 803,806 815,864 828,102 840,523 853,131 865,928 $ 1,344,104 109,408 111,838 114,317 116,845 119,423 122,052 124,734 127,468 $ 8,020,798 1,137,404 1,154,465 1,171,782 1,189,359 1,207,199 1,225,307 1,243,687 1,262,342 $ 2,142,232 303,783 308,340 312,965 317,660 322,424 327,261 332,170 337,152 $ 1,900,502 269,504 273,547 277,650 281,815 286,042 290,333 294,688 299,108 $ 4,410,983 530,878 530,878 530,878 530,878 530,878 530,878 530,878 530,878 $ 10,460,983 1,331,692 1,338,898 1,346,211 1,353,635 1,361,170 1,368,818 1,376,580 1,384,459 $ 93,961,737 $12,996,847 $13,171,857 $13,349,503 $13,529,826 $13,712,866 $13,898,664 $14,087,261 $14,278,700 Costs Program Cost $ 23,060,241 Work Zone Impacts $ 1,372,335 Maintenance Cost $ 2,155,478 Total Costs ($M) $ 26,588,054 Discount Factor 7% Discount Factor 3% NPV Calculation 30 year Present Value Benefits 94.0 Present Value Costs 26.6 Net Present Value (NPV) of Project 67.4 BCR 3.5 Benefits except emissions Benefits except emissions discounted Emissions discounted Costs discounted Annual Demand (Baseline) Car Bus Bike Walk Total Traffic Annual Demand (New Project) Car Bus Bike Walk Total Traffic 176,539 176,539 176,539 176,539 176,539 176,539 176,539 176,539 $176,539 $176,539 $176,539 $176,539 $176,539 $176,539 $176,539 $176,539 0.17 0.16 0.15 0.14 0.13 0.12 0.11 0.11 0.46 0.45 0.44 0.42 0.41 0.40 0.39 0.38 $12,887,439 $13,060,018 $13,235,186 $13,412,981 $13,593,442 $13,776,611 $13,962,528 $14,151,233 $2,219,159 $2,101,754 $1,990,601 $1,885,366 $1,785,731 $1,691,396 $1,602,076 $1,517,503 $50,732 $50,348 $49,965 $49,583 $49,201 $48,819 $48,439 $48,059 $30,399 $28,410 $26,552 $24,815 $23,191 $21,674 $20,256 $18,931 24,763,850 25,135,307 25,512,337 25,895,022 26,283,447 26,677,699 27,077,865 27,484,033 132,975 134,970 136,994 139,049 141,135 143,252 145,401 147,582 246,270 249,964 253,713 257,519 261,382 265,303 269,282 273,321 1,451,929 1,473,708 1,495,813 1,518,250 1,541,024 1,564,140 1,587,602 1,611,416 26,595,023 26,993,949 27,398,858 27,809,841 28,226,989 28,650,393 29,080,149 29,516,351 22,769,223 23,110,761 23,457,423 23,809,284 24,166,423 24,528,920 24,896,853 25,270,306 265,950 269,939 273,989 278,098 282,270 286,504 290,801 295,164 778,170 789,843 801,691 813,716 825,922 838,311 850,885 863,648 2,781,680 2,823,405 2,865,756 2,908,743 2,952,374 2,996,659 3,041,609 3,087,233 26,595,023 26,993,949 27,398,858 27,809,841 28,226,989 28,650,393 29,080,149 29,516,351 Change in Demand Car (44,521,876) (1,994,627) (2,024,546) (2,054,914) (2,085,738) (2,117,024) (2,148,780) (2,181,011) (2,213,726) Bus 2,968,125 132,975 134,970 136,994 139,049 141,135 143,252 145,401 147,582 Bike 11,872,500 531,900 539,879 547,977 556,197 564,540 573,008 581,603 590,327 Walk 29,681,251 1,329,751 1,349,697 1,369,943 1,390,492 1,411,349 1,432,520 1,454,007 1,475,818 Total Traffic - - - - - - - - Change in Person Mlles Travelled Car (75,301,333) (3,373,579) (3,424,182) (3,475,545) (3,527,678) (3,580,593) (3,634,302) (3,688,817) (3,744,149) Bus 21,222,094 950,772 965,034 979,509 994,202 1,009,115 1,024,252 1,039,615 1,055,210 Bike 28,256,551 1,265,923 1,284,912 1,304,186 1,323,748 1,343,605 1,363,759 1,384,215 1,404,978 Walk 25,822,688 1,156,884 1,174,237 1,191,850 1,209,728 1,227,874 1,246,292 1,264,986 1,283,961 Total Traffic - - - - - - - - Change in Vehicle Miles Travelled (VMT) Car (45,090,618) (2,020,107) (2,050,409) (2,081,165) (2,112,382) (2,144,068) (2,176,229) (2,208,872) (2,242,006) Bus 2,122,209 95,077 96,503 97,951 99,420 100,911 102,425 103,962 105,521 Bike 28,256,551 1,265,923 1,284,912 1,304,186 1,323,748 1,343,605 1,363,759 1,384,215 1,404,978 Walk 25,822,688 1,156,884 1,174,237 1,191,850 1,209,728 1,227,874 1,246,292 1,264,986 1,283,961 Total Traffic 497,777 505,243 512,822 520,514 528,322 536,247 544,291 552,455 Change In VMT 142,968,409) - (1,925,030) (1,953,905) (1,983,214) (2,012,962) (2,043,156) (2,073,804) (2,104,911) (2,136,485) Vehicle Operating Cost Savings VOC Benefits $ - Existing Users Car $ 868,646 $ 881,676 $ 894,901 $ 908,324 $ 921,949 $ 935,778 $ 949,815 $ 964,062 Bus (88,422) (89,748) (91,094) (92,461) (93,848) (95,255) (96,694) (98,134) Bike - - - - - - - - Walk Total 780,224 791,928 803,806 815,864 828,102 840,523 853,131 865,928 VOC Benefits $ - New Users Car - Bus - - - - - - - - Bike - - - - - - - - Walk Total - - - - - - - - 30 Year PV Total VOC Savings Emissions Benefits $ 5,502,020 780,224 791,928 803,806 815,864 828,102 840,523 853,131 865,928 Water Pollution Reduction Benefit Car $ 34,331 $ 34,846 $ 35,369 $ 35,899 $ 36,438 $ 36,984 $ 37,539 $ 38,102 Bus $ (1,616) $ (1,640) $ (1,665) $ (1,690) $ (1,715) $ (1,741) $ (1,767) $ (1,793) Bike - - - - - - - - Walk 30 Year PV Total $ 428,862 $ 32,715 $ 33,206 $ 33,704 $ 34,209 $ 34,723 $ 35,243 $ 35,772 $ 36,309 Air Emissions (Tons) Car 816.39 828.63 841.06 853.68 866.48 879.48 892.67 906.06 Bus (38) (39) (40) (40) (41) (41) (42) (43) Bike - - - - - - - - Walk Total Emissions Savings (Tons) 17,365 778 790 801 814 826 838 851 863 Air Emissions Benefits $ Car $ 80,481 $ 82,516 $ 84,595 $ 86,717 $ 88,884 $ 91,096 $ 93,355 $ 95,661 Bus $ (3,788) $ (3,884) $ (3,981) $ (4,081) $ (4,183) $ (4,287) $ (4,394) $ (4,502) Bike $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Walk 30 Year PV $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Total Emissions Savings $ 915,243 $ 76,693 $ 78,632 $ 80,613 $ 82,636 $ 84,701 $ 86,809 $ 88,961 $ 91,159 All Emissions Benefits $ Car $ 114,811 $ 117,362 $ 119,963 $ 122,616 $ 125,322 $ 128,081 $ 130,894 $ 133,763 Bus $ (5,404) $ (5,524) $ (5,646) $ (5,771) $ (5,898) $ (6,028) $ (6,161) $ (6,296) Bike - - - - - - - - Walk 30 Year PV Total Emissions Savings $ 1,344,104 $ 109,408 $ 111,838 $ 114,317 $ 116,845 $ 119,423 $ 122,052 $ 124,734 $ 127,468 Annual Accidents (Baseline) 30 Year No Injury 4,607 153.3 206.41 209.50 212.64 215.83 219.07 222.36 225.69 229.08 Possible Injury 1,308 43.5 58.59 59.47 60.36 61.26 62.18 63.12 64.06 65.02 Non Incapacitating 628 20.9 28.12 28.54 28.97 29.40 29.84 30.29 30.74 31.20 Incapacitating 75 2.5 3.37 3.42 3.47 3.52 3.57 3.63 3.68 3.74 Killed 8 0.3 0.34 0.34 0.35 0.35 0.36 0.36 0.37 0.37 Injured (severity unknown) - 0.00 0.00 0_00 0_00 0_00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total Accidents 6,625 296.8 301.3 305.8 310.4 315.0 329.8 324.5 329.4 Annual Accidents(New Project) No Injury 2,134 71.0 95.60 97.03 98.49 99.96 101.46 102.99 104.53 106.10 Possible Injury 579 19.3 25.94 26.33 26.73 27.13 27.54 27.95 28.37 28.79 Non Incapacitating 265 8.8 11.89 12.07 12.25 12.43 12.62 12.81 13.00 13.19 Incapacitating 27 0.9 1.23 1.25 1.26 1.28 1.30 1.32 1.34 1.36 Killed 3 0.1 0.12 0.12 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.14 Injured (severity unknown) - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total Accidents 3,008 134.78 136.80 138.85 140.93 243.05 145.19 147.37 149.58 Change in Incidents No Injury (2,473) -110.81-112.47-114.16-115.87-117.61-119.37-121.16-122.98 Possible Injury (729) -32.64 -33.13 -33.63 -34.14 -34.65 -35.17 -35.69 -36.23 Non Incapacitating (362) -16.23 -16.47 -16.72 -16.97 -17.22 -17.48 -17.75 -18.01 Incapacitating (48) -2.14 -2.17 -2.20 -2.24 -2.27 -2.31 -2.34 -2.38 Killed (5) -0.21 -0.22 -0.22 -0.22 -0.23 -0.23 -0.23 -0.24 Injured (severity unknown) - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total Accidents 3,617) -162.04-164.47-166.93-169.44-171.98-174.56-177.18-179.83 Value of a Statistical Life (VSL) Benefits $ No Injury $409,988 $416,138 $422,380 $428,716 $435,147 $441,674 $448,299 $455,024 Possible Injury $2,366,720 $2,402,221 $2,438,255 $2,474,828 $2,511,951 $2,549,630 $2,587,875 $2,626,693 Non Incapacitating $2,304,476 $2,339,043 $2,374,128 $2,409,740 $2,445,886 $2,482,575 $2,519,813 $2,557,610 Incapacitating $1,115,601 $1,132,335 $1,149,320 $1,166,559 $1,184,058 $1,201,819 $1,219,946 $1,238,144 Killed $2,337,169 $2,372,226 $2,407,810 $2,443,927 $2,480,586 $2,517,794 $2,555,561 $2,593,895 Injured (severity unknown) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Total VSL Benefits $8,533,954 $8,661,963 $8,791,892 $8,923,771 $9,057,627 $9,193,492 $9,331,394 $9,471,365 30 Year PV Safety Benefits Total $ 60,180,115 $8,533,954 $8,661,963 $8,791,892 $8,923,771 $9,057,627 $9,193,492 $9,331,394 $9,471,365 Other Benefits 30 Year PV Congestion Savings $ 2,142,232 $ 303,783 $ 308,340 $ 312,965 $ 317,660 $ 322,424 $ 327,261 $ 332,170 $ 337,152 State of Good Repair $ 1,900,502 $ 269,504 $ 273,547 $ 277,650 $ 281,815 $ 286,042 $ 290,333 $ 294,688 $ 299,108 Healthcare cost savings $ 8,020,798 $ 1,137,404 $ 1,154,465 $ 1,171,782 $ 1,189,359 $ 1,207,199 $ 1,225,307 $ 1,243,687 $ 1,262,342 Mobility Benefits Walkability $ 398,104 $ 398,104 $ 398,104 $ 398,104 $ 398,104 $ 398,104 $ 398,104 $ 398,104 $ 398,104 Cycling mobility, $ 132,774 $ 132,774 $ 132,774 $ 132,774 $ 132,774 $ 132,774 $ 132,774 $ 132,774 $ 132,774 Total Resilience Benefits 8, Flooding Risk) $ 4,410,983 $ 530,878 $ 530,878 $ 530,878 $ 530,878 $ 530,878 $ 530,878 $ 530,878 $ 530,878 (Hurricane Hurricane and 100-year flood Time Savings Benefits $ Car $ 473,134 $ 480,231 $ 487,435 $ 494,746 $ 502,167 $ 509,700 $ 517,345 $ 525,106 Bus $ 2,541 $ 2,579 $ 2,617 $ 2,657 $ 2,697 $ 2,737 $ 2,778 $ 2,820 Bike $ 4,705 $ 4,776 $ 4,847 $ 4,920 $ 4,994 $ 5,069 $ 5,145 $ 5,222 Walk Total $ 480,380 $ 487,586 $ 494,899 $ 502,323 $ 509,858 $ 517,506 $ 525,268 $ 533,147 Roadway reconstruction benefits $ 851,312 $ 851,312 $ 851,312 $ 851,312 $ 851,312 $ 851,312 $ 851,312 $ 851,312 $ 851,312 Resilience Benefits Total $ 10,460,983 $ 1,331,692 $ 1,338,898 $ 1,346,211 $ 1,353,635 $ 1,361,170 $ 1,368,818 $ 1,376,580 $ 1,384,459 Annual maintenance cost per mile ($2007) $ 66,105 Resurfacing and milling costs $ 2,664,842 Work zone impacts - Reduction in speed 10% 31.5 Study Area Adult Population 20,880 Study Area No. Households 7,109 A, Household size 4.3 Annual local population growth 1.5% Daily trip rate pp on GGP 2.3 Golden Gate Parkway AADT 26,386 26,777 1.5% Daily trip rate p HH on GGP 7 S Atlantic Mode Share m commute mode multipler for all trip Average trip Average trip share purposes distance (miles) time(mins) Bus 7.15 14 Bike 1.0% 0.93 2.38 18 92.6% 1.611 Walk 1.8% 3.03 0.87 17 303.3% 4.323 Daily trips made by local population to/from/on GGP corridor Base Mode Daily trips Daily trips with Share Mode shift New Mode Share baseline project %change Daily trips pp Car 93% -7.5% 85.6% 44,717 41,116 -8% 1.97 Bus 0.5% 0.5% 1.0% 240 480 100% 0.02 Bike 0.9% 2.0% 2.9% 445 1,405 216% 0.07 Walk 5.5% 5.0% 10.5% 2,622 5,023 92% 0.24 48,024 48,024 Nk-alk es%of 13 mile trips 2a% Walk az%&f 1mile trips 37% Reduced Fatalities and Injuries Bikes Pedestrians Pedestrians Vehicles Vehicles Vehicles Vehicles Road user involved in crash: Golden Gate Pway Golden Gate Pway Side streets Golden Gate Pway Golden Gate Pway Golden Gate Pway Golden Gate Pway Location: All All All Night Day Night Day Crash type: Aggressive driving Aggressive driving Other Other Improve Lighti ng Improve Lighting Improve Lighting Improve Lighting (Intersections) Install New Lighting (Intersections) Install New Lighting (Intersections) Install New Lighting (Intersections) Install New Lighting Historical crash data Crashes with no injuries 4 0 2 83 67 303 233 89 45 199 201 Possible Injury 3 4 1 50 5 116 28 23 24 50 44 Non Incapacitating 8 5 4 29 2 31 8 22 9 26 23 Incapacitating 2 1 0 6 0 7 0 1 1 1 1 Killed 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Total Injuries 13 10 5 86 7 155 36 46 34 77 68 Total crashes No. years ofdata 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 Annual $ benefit: ($245,731) ($167,453) ($75,351) ($1,911,605) ($80,565) ($2,068,244) ($286,875) ($399,990) ($280,946) ($439,180) ($380,269) Crashes with no injuries 0.50 0.00 0.25 10.38 8.38 37.88 29.13 11.13 5.63 24.88 25.13 Possible Injury 0.38 0.50 0.13 6.25 0.63 14.50 3.50 2.88 3.00 6.25 5.50 Non Incapacitating 1.00 0.63 0.50 9.63 0.25 3.88 1.00 2.75 1.13 3.25 2.88 Incapacitating 0.25 0.13 0.00 0.75 0.00 0.88 0.00 0.13 0.13 0.13 0.13 Killed 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.13 0.00 0.13 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.W 0.00 Total Injuries 1.63 1.25 0.63 10.75 0.88 19.38 4.50 5.75 4.25 9.63 8.50 Countermeasures and Crash Reduction Factors Road Diet -29% -29% -29% -29% -29% -29% Install bike path CMF ID: 4097 -74% Install sidewalk (to avoid walking along roadway) -88% Provide paved shoulder (of at least 4 feet) -71% Resurface pavement CMF ID: 10280 -21% -21% -21% -21% -21% Pedestrian lighting -42% -42% Improve lighting at intersection (night) -45% -45% New lighting (night) -50% Improve lighting (day) -25% New lighting (day) -23% Overall CRF -a% -57% Congestion Savings Congestion savings per mile $0.16 State of good repair Roadway Maintenance Cost Savings per VMT $0.14 Water Pollution Price per veh mile in $2019 prices Average car Cost per mile ($2007) $0.014 $0.017 Diesel Bus Cost per mile ($2007) $0.014 Electric bus Cost per mile ($2007) $0.007 Active Travel Health Benefits Healthcare cast savings pp/yr of physical activity $576 % Active Adults in Florida(150 mins/wk aerobic activity) 52.8% % Inactive Adults in Florida 26.9% Walkability Current walk score 68 Increase in walk score 2 Property value price increase for+1 point walkability score $700 Benefit distributed over X years 25 -21% -21% -21% -50% -25% -23% -57% -61% -41% -39% Bus Ridership Annual Daily FY16 Ridership 344,665 944.29 Trips per person 16.51 0.05 Assumed baseline GGP bus trips 87,644 240 Annual boardings/alightings on GGP 38,467 105 Assumed increase in ridership -annual 98,730 270 Increase in GGP boardings/alightings 157% Population along GGP Corridor Use Type Total Single -Family Residential 114 Dwelling units Multi -Family Residential 502 Dwelling units Cammercial/Office 525,650 Square feet Drive in Restaurant 8,415 square feet Church 20,428 Square feet Government 82,040 squarefeet Total Population along the corridor Resiliency Flooded days after hurrricane storm surge or 100 year flood Average flooding depth over that period (mm) Maximum acceptable velocity under flooding conditions (mph) Average speed in normal conditions Average extra travel time per trip during flood Annual increase in chance of a hurricane Hurricane events, 60 mile radius People 490 2159 2649 13% 2 300 1 35 98.7 0% Events since 1900 Events per year % of roadway segment affected during hurricane storm surge Before project After project Cat 1 0% Cat 2 2% Cat 3 5 0.04 82% 0% Cat 8 0.07 97% 0% Cats 2 0.02 98% 0% Cat 3,4,5 15 0.13 92% 0% 100-year Floodplain 0.01 33% 0% Depth to Cost Assumptions 1. Flood Depth <0.5 depth = zero dollars (no MOT or debris removal) 2. Flood Depth = < 2.0' _ (debris removal, $5000 and MOT for closures, $2500), per roadway, not segment. 3. Flood Depth > 2.0 feet = Reconstruction Cost x % based on Proximity Description Damage as % Replacement cost Designation AdlacenttuwaterbWy.,within fio.dplain, subject to surge/wave on, pei 100% 1 Adjacent to waterbodY rwithin floodplain s bject tosuige/wave anion, pai 80% 2 Offset but no protective infrastructure between; subject to surge/wave aaior 60% 3 Offset but npp—dive inmOrmon,between; subjecttosuige/waveactior 40% 4 Offset multiple levels, some erasion risk z. or cleanup, which-, 5 Offset multiple levels, no erosion risk n/a(cleanup only) 6 Provmiry no evaluated due to 500-Year depth <2A' n/a(cleanup only) 7 Proj,not evaluated due [o 500-Yeardepthc 1.0' n/a clea only) 8 Provmiry not evaluated due tobridge n/a(eridge) 0 GGP Corridor Length 2.2 Number of lanes (on one side) 4 Collier County Average commute time(min! 23 Average commute distance 13 KABCO Monetized Value ($2019) No Injury $3,700 Possible Injury $72,500 Non Incapacitating $142,000 Incapacitating $521,300 Killed $10,9001000 Injured $197,600 # Accidents Reported (Unl $150,200 Crash Type Injury $284,100 Fatal 1$12,071,000 Property Damage Only Crashes Per vehicle $4,500 Value of time (hour) - In -vehicle travel Personal $16.50 Business $27.90 All purposes $17.90 Vehicle occupancy Car 1.67 Bus 10 Bike 1 Walk 1 Vehicle Operating Costs Permile LID vehicles $0.43 Trucks 1$0.93 Inflation to $2019 price 2005 1.2842 2006 1.2465 1.2139 2007 2008 1.1907 1.1817 2009 2010 1.1681 1.1442 2011 2012 1.1227 1.1033 2013 2014 1.0832 1.073 2015 2016 1.0619 1.0423 2017 2018 2019 1.0179 1 e�W Yatlw r uMa ....n. .-tea awwr..r. r�w�rrr,��w�wwamrw wwtw.wwi....�r rewaverF� •.... �,..e. 0.007 grams per mile 0.000000007 tons per mile Mr«rwr�r•M.M vrw twaow q.ww. sn.ro upe�z'r�vmu�-� nil aybrregrea. oe..r.i. rimer la....rw. is ie� TRUE $ 0.00 $ 0.00 $ 0.01 $ 0.02 Emissions (metric tons/VMT) Damage costs per metric ton Blended $/VMT Nox Sot PM2.5 Cot Total Nox Sot PM2.5 Cot 2025 0.0000001 0.0000000042 0.000000007 0.000404 0.000404131 $ 16,800 $ 44,900 $ 796,600 $ 56 $ 0.02 $0.03 2026 0.0000001 0.000000004 0.000000007 0.000404 0.000404131 $ 17,000 $ 45,500 $ 807,500 $ 57 $0.03 2027 0.0000001 0.000000004 0.000000007 0.000404 0.000404131 $ 17,300 $ 46,200 $ 818,600 $ 58 $0.03 2028 0.0000001 0.000000004 0.000000007 0.000404 0.000404131 $ 17,500 $ 46,900 $ 829,800 $ 59 $0.03 2029 0.0000001 0.000000004 0.000000007 0.00D404 0.00D404131 $ 17,700 $ 47,600 $ 841,200 $ 60 $0.03 2030 0.0000001 0.000000004 0.000000007 0.000404 0.000404131 $ 18,000 $ 48,200 $ 852,700 $ 61 $0.03 2031 0.0000001 0.OD0000DD4 0.000000007 0.000404 0.000404131 $ 18,000 $ 48,200 $ 852,700 $ 62 $0.03 2032 0.0000001 0.000000004 0.000000007 0.000404 0.000404131 $ 18,000 $ 48,200 $ 852,700 $ 63 $0.03 2033 0.0000001 0.0000000D4 0.000000007 0.0UD404 0.0UD404131 $ 18,000 $ 48,200 $ 852,700 $ 64 $0.03 2034 0.0000001 0.000000004 0.000000007 0.000404 0.000404131 $ 18,000 $ 48,200 $ 852,700 $ 65 $0.03 2035 0.0000001 0.000000004 0.000000007 0.DD0404 O.DDD404131 $ 18,000 $ 48,200 $ 852,700 $ 66 $0.03 2036 0.0000001 0.000000004 0.000000007 0.000404 0.000404131 $ 18,000 $ 48,200 $ 852,700 $ 67 $0.04 2037 0.0000001 0.000000004 0.000000007 0.DD0404 0.D00404131 $ 18,000 $ 48,200 $ 852,700 $ 68 $0.04 2038 0.0000001 0.000000004 0.000000007 0.000404 0.000404131 $ 18,000 $ 48,200 $ 852,700 $ 69 $0.04 2039 0.0000001 0.000000004 0.000000007 0.D00404 0.D00404131 $ 18,000 $ 48,200 $ 852,700 $ 70 $0.04 2040 0.0000001 0.000000004 0.000000007 0.000404 0.000404131 $ 18,000 $ 48,200 $ 852,700 $ 71 $0.04 2041 0.0000001 0.000000004 0.000000007 O.00D404 O.00D404131 $ 18,000 $ 48,200 $ 852,700 $ 72 $0.04 2042 0.0000001 0.000000004 0.000000007 0.000404 0.000404131 $ 18,000 $ 48,200 $ 852,700 $ 73 $0.04 2043 0.0000001 0.OD0000DD4 0.000000007 0.000404 0.000404131 $ 18,000 $ 48,200 $ 852,700 $ 74 $0.04 2044 0.0000001 0.000000004 0.000000007 0.000404 0.000404131 $ 18,000 $ 48,200 $ 852,700 $ 75 $0.04 2045 0.0000001 0.0000000D4 0.000000007 0.D00404 0.000404131 $ 18,000 $ 48,200 $ 852,700 $ 76 $0.04 2046 0.0000001 0.000000004 0.000000007 0.000404 0.000404131 $ 18,000 $ 48,200 $ 852,700 $ 77 $0.04 2047 0.0000001 0.0000000D4 0.000000007 0.DD0404 O.DDD404131 $ 18,000 $ 48,200 $ 852,700 $ 78 $0.04 2048 0.0000001 0.000000004 0.000000007 0.000404 0.000404131 $ 18,000 $ 48,200 $ 852,700 $ 79 $0.04 2049 0.0000001 0.0000000D4 0.000000007 0.000404 0.000404131 $ 18,000 $ 48,200 $ 852,700 $ 80 $0.04 2050 0.0000001 0.000000004 0.000000007 0.000404 0.000404131 $ 18,000 $ 48,200 $ 852,700 $ 81 $0.04 2051 0.0000001 0.00000DD04 0.000000007 0.D00404 0.D00404131 $ 18,000 $ 48,200 $ 852,700 $ 82 $0.04 2052 0.0000001 0.000000004 0.000000007 0.000404 0.000404131 $ 18,000 $ 48,200 $ 852,700 $ 83 $0.04 2053 0.0000001 0.000000004 0.000000007 0.D00404 0.D00404131 $ 18,000 $ 48,200 $ 852,700 $ 84 $0.04 2054 0.0000001 0.000000004 0.000000007 0.D00404 0.D00404131 $ 18,000 $ 48,200 $ 852,700 $ 85 $0.04 https://www.epa.gov/energy/green house-gases-equivalencies-calculator-calculations-and-references#::text=The%20average%20vehicle%20miles%20traveled,was%200.993%20(E PA%202020). https://www.bts.gov/content/estimated-nationa I-average-vehicle-e m issipns-rates-vehicle-veh icle-type-using-gasoline-and 1.20E-07 4.20E-09 7.00E-09 4.04E-04 TAG Table A 4.1.7 Walking Schemes Apply this or property value but not both? This version: July 2020 v1.13.1 Jun-20 Links: Contents TAG Unit 3.14.1 TAG Unit A 4.1 Parameters: Price year: 2010 Value year: 2010 Table 4.1.7i Values of aspects In pedestrian (2010 value. and 2010 price.) Scheme type environment Value m Source Street lighting 3.1 Heuman(2005) Kerb level 2.7 Heuman (2005) Crowding 1.9 Heuman(2005) Pavement- enness 0.9 Heuman (2005) Information panels 0.9 Heuman(2005) Benches 0.6 Heuman(2005) Directional simage 0.6 H... (2005) TAG Table A 4.1.6 id segregated cycle lane id non -segregated cycle lane I We lane cycle parking facilities ✓alue $/min $201. Heuman, D. (2005y' Investment In the Strategic Walks - Economic Evaluation with WAVES', Strategic Walk Network. London: Colin Buchanan and Partners Ltd. $ 0.06 Daniel Heuman, Paul Buchanan, Martin Weddeibum and Rob Sheldon, (2005), "Valuing Walking: Evaluating Improvements to the Public Realm", Colin Buchanan and Accent MR $ 0.04 $ 0.03 The values are calculated by multiplying the source data bythe GDP deflator for the price year divided by the GDP deflator for source year; multiplying by the GDPlhead for the value year divided by GDP/head for the source year, $ 0.01 and multiplied by 100 W convert from pounds to pence. $ 0.01 $ 0.01 Data Book source worksheets Walking, Annual Parameters $ 0.01 TAG 1: Unit 3.14.1 (Table 5) Avg bike speed (mph) Avg walk speed (mph) ua Imin Source Value $/min $2019 7.0 Hopkinson & Wardman (1996) $ 0.11 3.0 Hopkinson &WaNman (1996) $ 0.049 3.0 WaNman et al. (1997) 1.6 Hopkinson & Wardman (1996) 0.6 Hopkinson & WaNman (1996) pence 1 98.1 WaNman..I.(2007) 20.8 WaNman et N.(2007) N otes n year 15 From Golden Gate Walkable Community Study: "Approximately 29,000 people living in the Golden Gate City study area. 28% are children underthe age of 18." "There is a total of 7,109 households, with an average size of 4.3 people per household. The average household size in Collier County is 2.4 people. Of the 7,109 households in Golden Gate City, 957 do not have a car." Number of daily trips which are on/to/from GG parkway, per person in local popn From feasibility study traffic counts 2019 Daily VMT per househould in 2017 NTSwas54.38 httos:JJn hts. orn I.¢ovJ NHTS2017- lj Commute mode shareforthe region, 2) National modeshare by trip purpose used to dervive multpliertogetfrom commute modeshare to overall modeshare 2017 NHTSforTrip length by trip mode and journey purpose 211 13us mode share set to be— daily boardings & alightings on GGPx 2 (because study area residents may board f alight at Other stops not on GGP) Assume commute bike modeshare increases by 1% x 2 milesof bike lanes "For typical U.S. cities with populations over 250,000, each additional mile of bike lanes per square mile is associated with a roughly one percent increase in the share of workers commuting by bicycle. AsimiIar road diet on Edgewater Drive in Orlando resulted in a 23 percent increase in pedestrian traffic, a 30 percent increase in bicycietraffic" (Smart Growth America Com pl ete Streets Research) Walk mode shift assumptions va I idations: 1) 2001 National Household Transportation Survey found that48 percent of all trips in metropolitan areas are three mil es or less and 28 percent Of all i metropolitan trips are one mile or less— distances easi iy trave rs ed by foot or bicycle. Yet 65 percent of trips under one mile are made by automobile, in part because of incompiete streets that make it dangerous or unpleasanttow alk, bicycle, or take transit. 2) 2017 NHTS walk modeshare is 4% for commute and 10% for all purposes. 3) Of the 7,109 households in Golden Gate City, 957 do not have a car. 2013-2020crash data Source for each crash reduction factor httos flwvw fhwa dot.zovfuu hli�aticnslresea rchlsafetv119053lC:—Text--The%20iuw a%20d ata%20indica[e%2lla.percent%7lldecrease%E2%89%94a%29suhsiantial%2ad itference &text Comhi nine%29horM1%20data%20se[s%20results.oercent%29red uc[ion%20in%20[otal%2lkrashes_ htto: 11w w w. cmfclearinahouse. ornldetail. cfm?facid= 4n97#commentanchor httr?J1www.cmfofeariuhouse_org{deta iI_i-fm2facid=113 O 42% Ped lighting page 103 http�fwww_cmfdearinghouse.-orgfcoi. ate raiJFHWA_Desktop_Refere nce_Guide.pdf 45V improUe lighting at interseotion - night http:llw ww. omfolearinghouse. orgloollaterallFHWA�desktop—Referenoe_Guide.pdf page 91 50% all nighttimewhere install new 25% improve lighting day http://wwrw.cmfclearinghouse.org/co.;aterai/FHWA_Desktop_Reference_Guide.pdf 23% install new day http�/www.cmfcl fFHWA_Desktop_Reference_Guide.pdf https:f{www.vtt i.org/tca{tca4545.pdf Congestion savings per mile - adjusted from $0.13 in 2007$ Kitamura, Rom., Zhao, H., and Gubby, A. R. Development of a Pavement MaintenanceCost AlIocation Model. Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California, Davis. �https�t/trid-trb.org/view.a5px?id=26176S] Transportation Cost and Benefit Analysis II — Water Pollution - pg 10 httns:f fwww.ytp1.Grg ftca ftca0515. ad` $0.014 in 2007 $ r.adeouate Physical Activity and Health Care Ehoenditures ir. the United States Icdc.sovi "After including BM categary as a covariate, the means of annual expenditure and percent differencesfor inactive adults ($1313, 26.6%) and insufficiently active adults ($576, 12.1%) 2014State Indicator Report on Physical Activity fcdC.; Dv) httosJlww w.w a i kscGre.com lsiorelgGl d e n-gate-n a of es httos Jlsm a rtzrowtha m eri ca.org lw o-co ntent/u Gl oa ds/20161081rs-econ om i c.odf "In a survey of 15 real estate markets from Jacksonville, Florida to Stockton, California a one -point increase in the wa l k a bi l ity of a neighborhood as measured by Ma gprnnp or Rouu'+sorvinp sway Rrer From Feasibility Study: 19 1e It3235 Myn - Bus Stop I Yea rly Boa rd Yea rly Al ight An n u a l Daily - +s CPp02 Stop 315 1,146 727 1,873 from Golden Gate Walkable Community -Study — - Stop 314 623 383 1,006 �n 1 — Stop 313 1,047 s36 1,433 includes peo pie board i ngJa l ig hti ng oth er stops in catch ment area 2' xr.tr. Stop 310 8s7 547 1, 384 7" PAWN Stop 309 970 95s 1,933 i ndudes peo pie board i ngJa l ig hti ng oth er stops in catch ment area Stop 309 1,376 436 1,812 We assume all new riders will board/alight on GGP corridor as that's where improvements to bus sl Stop 207 1,195 1,787 2,982 Stop 206 1,979 2,447 4,425 Stop 186 7% s5S 1,129 Stop 185 543 s65 909 Total boarding 20A73 17,994 38,467 105 Equation Sou rce:5ettion 3.1 - https- lv""d.sciencedirest.comiscience!articleJpiiJ51361920915309367#fDO10 Section 3.1 Hurricanes are expe-ted to 'Increase in severity but not frequency as a resu!t of ci,mate change Source: https://coast.noaa.gov/hurricanes/#map=8.91/26.1827/- 81.7022&search=eyJzZWFVY2hTdHJpbmciOilyNi4xOD12OTMsIC04MS43MDIVMylslnNIYXJia FRScGUiOiJIZW50ZXIiLCJvc21JRC161iEVMTY3NzgiLCJsY XQiOi12LiE4MiY5MywibG9uliotODEuNzAyMiMslmNhdGVnb3JpZXMiOlsiSDUiXSwieWVhcnMiOltdLCJtb250aHMiOltdLCJlbnNvlipbXSwicHJlc3N1c mUiOnsicmFuZ2UiOlswLDExNTBdLCJpbmNsdWRIVW5rbm93blBVZXNzdXJllipOcnVlfSwidGFiSWSkZXgiOIEslmJ1ZmZlcil6MiAslmJ1ZmZlclVuaXQiOls iTmFldGliYWwgTWIsZXMiXSwic29ydFNIbGVidGlvbil6eyJ2YWx1ZS161mludGVuc210eV9oaWdoliwibGFiZWwiOiJJbnRlbnNpdHkgKEhpZ2gpinOslmFw cGx5VG9BTOkiOnRydWUslmJhc2VtYXAiOiJzdHJIZXRzliwiaXNTdG9ybUxhYmVsclZpc2libGUiOnRydWV9 Centered around GGP, 20nm radius Assume that raising the road by a foot removes atfrom cat 3 storm surge and IM-yearfaoodpiain Table A• 6: Damage CosLs frrr Emissions per metric ton Emission Type No, so.* PM,,-* cot 2020 $15,700 $40,400 $7Z9,300 $50 2021 515,900 $41,300 $742,300 $52 2022 $15,100 $42,100 5755,500 $53 2023 516,400 $43,{f00 $769,000 $54 2024 $16,500 $43,900 $732,700 $55 2025 $16,800 $44,900 $796,600 $56 2026 517,fl00 545,500 $807,500 $57 2027 $17,300 $48,200 5818,600 $59 2028 $17,500 546,900 $8Z9,800 $59 2029 $17,700 $47,600 $84-1,200 $60 2010 518,000 $48,200 5852,700 $61 2031 $18,000 $48,200 $852,700 Sfi2 2032 $18,000 $4$,200 $852,700 $63 2031 $18,000 $48,200 $852,700 $64 2014 $18,000 549,200 $85Z,700 566 2035 $18,000 548,200 $952,700 $67 2036 $1.9,000 $48,Z00 $852,700 $68 2037 $19,000 $49,200 5852,700 $69 2039 $18,000 548,200 $852,700 570 2039 $18,000 $48,Z00 5852,700 $71 2040 $18,000 $48,200 $852,700 $72 2041 $18,000 545,200 $852,700 573 2042 $19,000 548,ZOO $85Z,700 $75 2041 $19,000 548,200 $852,700 S76 2044 518,000 $49,200 $852,700 577 2045 $18,000 $48,Z00 $85Z,700 $78 2046 $19,000 $48,200 5852,700 S79 2047 518,000 548,200 5852,700 SSo 2049 518,000 $48,200 $852,700 $01 2049 518,000 548,Z00 $952,700 $83 2050 51.9,000 548,200 5852,700 584 'Applicants should carefully note whether their emissions data is reported in short tons or metric tons. A metric tan is equal to 1.1015 short tons. "Applicants should be careful to not apply the PM2.s value to estimates of total emissions of PMlo. The Safer Affordable Fuel -Efficient Vehicles liWe for MY2021-MY2026 Possenger Cars and Light Trucks Finol Regulatory Impact Analysis (March 2020)' httos:lJwww.nhisa.Qovlsiteslnhfsa.dot.eo Y/files1documents/final safe fria web ve rsion 200701.pdf Technical Updote of the Social Cost of Carbon for Regulatory Impact Analysis Under Executive Order 12966 (August 2016) htt os:llwww.e o a, ¢ov! s itesJ prod uct i o n Jf i I es/2016 12/documents/sc cot tsd auEust 2016.a cif Values are intlated from 207 and 2016 dollars to 2019 dollars using the GOP deflator. Nate: Fuel saved (gasoline, diesel, natural gas, etc.) can he converted into metric tans of emissions using EPA guidelines available at https:lJwww.eoa, Qpvlenerevlere enhou se -gases-e quivalenries-ca Iculator- calculations-and-references Note: The recommended values for reducing CCh emissions reported in Table A-6 represent the values of future economic damages that can he avoided by reducing emissions in each future year by one metric ton. After using per -tan values to estimate the total value of reducing Cot emissions in any future year, the result must be furtherdiscounted to its present value as of the analysis year used in the 13LA, also using a 3 percent discount rate. TaffleA-TInflationAdjwtmeat Values Base Year of Nominal Dollar Multiplier to Adjust to Reak 2019 2002 1.3851 2003 1.3598 2004 1.3242 2005 1.2 942 2006 1.246S 2007 1.2139 200E 1.1907 2009 1.1817 2010 1.1691 2011 1.1442 2012 1.1227 2013 1.1033 2014 1.0932 2015 1.073Q 2016 3.0619 2017 1.0423 201E 1.0179 2019 1.0040 Bureau of Economic Anafysis, Noborrad Income and Product A cco un ts, Table 1.1_-9, "imph6t Price deflators for Gross Domestic Product" (December 2020) https://apps.bea_gov/iTable/iTable.cfm 7regid=19 &step=3&isuri=1&1921=survey+&1903=114recid= 1'J&step=3&isuri=1&1921=sur,vev&1903=11 SECTIONS: 1. Type of Federal Action 2. Status of Federal Action 3. Report Type 4. Name and Address of Reporting Entity 5. If Entity Is Subawardee, Name and Address of Prime 6. Federal Department/Agent 7. CFDA Number 8. Federal Action Number 9. Award Amount 10.a. Name and Address of Lobbying Registrant 10.b. Individual Performing Services 11. Signature of Certifying Official 12. Burden Statement 20005 IFirst Name: Amanda Middle Name: Last Name: Wood ISuffix: 1275 K Street, N.W. Suite 850 I City: Washington IState: DC: District of Columbia IZIP Code: 20005 11. SIGNATURE OF CERTIFYING OFFICIAL: Information requested through this form is authorized by title 31 U.S.C. section 1352. This disclosure of lobbying activities is a material representation of fad upon which reliance was placed by the tier above when the transaction was made or entered into. This disclosure is required pursuant to 31 U.S.C. 1352- This information will be reported to the Congress semi-annually and will be available for public inspection. Any person who fails to file the required disclosure shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less than $10,000 and not more than $100,000 for each such failure. P refi x- O First Name: Mark Middle Name: Last Name: Isackson Suffix: Title: County Manager Phone Number: Signature: Completed on submission to Grani Date Signed: Completed on submission to Grani IPA :111091=►9=1liI=10119 According to the Paperwork Reduction Ad, as amended, no persons are required to respond to a collection of information unless it displays a valid OMB Control Number. The valid OMB control numberfor this information collection is OMB No. 4040-0013. Public reporting burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 10 minutes per response. including time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding the burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information. including suggestions for reducing this burden, to the Office of Management and Budget Paperwork Reduction Project (4040-0013), Washington, DC 20503.