Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Agenda 05/25/2021 Item #17D (Resolution - PL20190002355 Amending GGAMP)
17.D 05/25/2021 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Recommendation to approve a Resolution of the Board of County Commissioners proposing amendment to the Collier County Growth Management Plan, Ordinance 89-05, as amended, specifically amending the Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub -Element of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan and the Rural Golden Gate Estates Future Land Use Map and Map Series to create the Immokalee Road/4th Street N.E. Mixed Use Subdistrict by changing the designation of the property from the Estates -Mixed Use District, Residential Estates Subdistrict to the Estates -Mixed Use District, Immokalee Road/4th Street N.E. Mixed Use Subdistrict, to allow uses permitted by right and conditional use in the General Commercial (C-4) zoning district with a total maximum intensity of up to 150,000 square feet of gross floor area of development, and a maximum of 400 residential dwelling units, and furthermore directing transmittal of the amendment to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity. The subject property is located on the northeast corner of the intersection of Immokalee Road and 4th street NE in Section 22, Township 48 North, Range 27 East, consisting of 50.18E acres. [PL20190002355] (Transmittal Hearing) [Coordinator: James Sabo, AICP, Comprehensive Planning Manager] OBJECTIVE: To approve (transmit) the amendment to the Collier County Growth Management Plan (GMP) and approve said amendment for transmittal to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity (DEO). CONSIDERATIONS: Petition PL20190002355 seeks to create the Immokalee Road/4th Street N.E. Mixed Use Subdistrict by amending the Rural Golden Gate Estates (RGGE) Sub -Element of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan (GGAMP) and the Rural Golden Gate Estates Future Land Use Map and Map Series; and furthermore directing the transmittal of the amendment to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity. Note: A companion PUD Amendment petition is scheduled for the adoption hearing in the future. • Chapter 163, F.S., provides for an amendment process for a local government's adopted Growth Management Plan. • Collier County Resolution No. 12-234 provides for a public petition process to amend the Collier County GMP. • The Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC), sitting as the "local planning agency" under Chapter 163.3174, F.S., held its Transmittal hearing for this petition on April 19 (having been continued from the April 1 st and April 15th, 2020 meetings). • This Transmittal hearing for PL20190002355/CP-20-01 considers an amendment to the Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub -Element of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan (GGAMP). The GMP amendment requested is specific to the Immokalee Road 4' Street N.E. Mixed -Use District but is related to the Estates Shopping Center Subdistrict because there is 140,000 square feet of commercial use being transferred from that site. The site is approximately 50.18 acres and is located between 4th Street N.E. and Immokalee Road, south and west of Orange Tree Boulevard. The property has approximately 762 feet of frontage on 4th Street NE, and 2,200 feet of frontage on Immokalee Road. The property lies within the Rural Estates Planning Community, in Section 22, Township 48 South, Range 27 East. Packet Pg. 2052 17.D 05/25/2021 This petition seeks to amend the GMP, adopted by Ordinance No. 89-05, as amended, specifically amending the Rural Golden Gate Estates (RGGE) Sub -Element of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan (GGAMP) by: to allow uses permitted by right and conditional use in the General Commercial (C-4) zoning district with a total maximum intensity of up to 150,000 square feet of gross floor area of development, and a maximum of 400 residential dwelling unit. This subject property is undeveloped. Staffs analysis of this petition is included in the Transmittal CCPC Staff Report. There were no public speakers at the CCPC meeting for the Transmittal hearing. Based on the review of this large-scale GMP amendment petition, including the supporting data and analysis, staff makes the following findings and conclusions: • The 50.18-acre total size subject property is designated E, Estates and undeveloped. • The infrastructure needed to serve the development can be provided without related levels of service or concurrency concerns. • The proposed mixed -use project will generate additional traffic for the roadway network at this location. Additional potential traffic may impact the surrounding areas. Commercial development and residential development will be limited by a 753 PM Peak Hour gross trip figure. • The Collier Interactive Growth Model (CIGM) characterizes development proposed for this Subdistrict as a community shopping center. All development in this area is being limited to "community commercial" center C-3 intensity uses and amounts to a lower commercial intensity than is proposed by the C-4 zoning district. Staff assesses this C-3 limitation to be a fair and uniform application of the CIGM. • The 400 residential dwelling units or apartments make a density footprint of approximately eight (8) dwelling units per acre - while the density in the surrounding residential area is about 1 dwelling unit per 2.5 to 5.0 acres. No provisions for housing affordability are part of the applicant's proposal. • The proposed Subdistrict will have impacts on the potable water, wastewater treatment systems and other public facilities since the level of service (LOS) standards are based on population. No adverse impacts were found. • The property, along with much of the surrounding area, is currently designated in the Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub -Element for commercial development. This petition introduces new mixed -use development, uses and activities to a location where such development is planned. • Sites generally located within the market area currently provide more than 1.25 Million sq. ft. and 308 acres of commercial use opportunities. Approximately 132 of these commercial acres are undeveloped. • Speakers present at the Neighborhood Information Meeting objected to allowing commercial traffic onto 4th Street NE, as this is a quiet street with only residences and residential traffic and agreed with the proposals that would allow entirely no vehicular access. IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF THE PERTINENT REQUIREMENTS Packet Pg. 2053 17.D 05/25/2021 Considerations required for the adoption of a comprehensive plan amendment are listed below. 2. The future land use plan and plan amendments shall be based upon surveys, studies, and data regarding the area, as applicable, including: a. The amount of land required to accommodate anticipated growth. b. The projected permanent and seasonal population of the area. c. The character of undeveloped land. d. The availability of water supplies, public facilities, and services. e. The need for redevelopment, including the renewal of blighted areas and the elimination of nonconforming uses which are inconsistent with the character of the community. f. The compatibility of uses on lands adjacent to or closely proximate to military installations. g. The compatibility of uses on lands adjacent to an airport as defined in s. 330.35 and consistent with s. 333.02. h. The discouragement of urban sprawl. i. The need for job creation, capital investment, and economic development that will strengthen and diversify the community's economy. j. The need to modify land uses and development patterns within antiquated subdivisions. 8. Future land use map amendments shall be based upon the following analyses: a. An analysis of the availability of facilities and services. b. An analysis of the suitability of the plan amendment for its proposed use considering the character of the undeveloped land, soils, topography, natural resources, and historic resources on site. c. An analysis of the minimum amount of land needed to achieve the goals and requirements of this section. The data and analysis provided for the amendment generally support the proposed changes to the RGGE Sub -Element of the GGAMP. The complete staff analysis of this petition is provided in the CCPC Transmittal Staff Report. FISCAL IMPACT: No fiscal impacts to Collier County result from this amendment, as this approval is for the Transmittal of this proposed amendment. Petition fees account for staff review time and materials, and the cost of associated legal advertising/public notice for the public hearings. GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: Approval of the proposed amendment by the Board for Transmittal and its submission to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity and other statutorily required agencies will commence the Department's thirty (30) day review process and ultimately return Packet Pg. 2054 17.D 05/25/2021 the amendment to the CCPC and the Board for Adoption hearings tentatively later in 2021. LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: This Growth Management Plan (GMP) amendment is authorized by, and subject to the procedures established in, Chapter 163, Part II, Florida Statutes, The Community Planning Act, and by Collier County Resolution No. 12-234, as amended. The Board should consider the following criteria in making its decision: "plan amendments shall be based on relevant and appropriate data and an analysis by the local government that may include but not be limited to, surveys, studies, community goals and vision, and other data available at the time of adoption of the plan amendment. To be based on data means to react to it in an appropriate way and to the extent necessary indicated by the data available on that particular subject at the time of adoption of the plan or plan amendment at issue." 163.3177(1)(f), FS. In addition, s. 163.3177(6)(a)2, FS provides that FLUE plan amendments shall be based on surveys, studies and data regarding the area, as applicable including: a. The amount of land required to accommodate anticipated growth. b. The projected permanent and seasonal population of the area. C. The character of undeveloped land. d. The availability of water supplies, public facilities, and services. e. The need for redevelopment, including the renewal of blighted areas and the elimination of non -conforming uses which are inconsistent with the character of the community. f. The compatibility of uses on lands adjacent to or closely proximate to military installations. g. The compatibility of uses on lands adjacent to an airport as defined in s. 330.35 and consistent with s. 333.02. h. The need to modify land uses and development patterns with antiquated subdivisions. The discouragement of urban sprawl. j. The need for job creation, capital investment and economic development that will strengthen and diversify the community's economy. And FLUE map amendments shall also be based upon the following analysis per Section 163.3177(6)(a)8.: a. An analysis of the availability of facilities and services. b. An analysis of the suitability of the plan amendment for its proposed use considering the character of the undeveloped land, soils, topography, natural resources, and historic resources on site. C. An analysis of the minimum amount of land needed to achieve the goals and requirements of this section. This item is approved as to form and legality. It requires a majority vote for approval because this is a transmittal hearing of the GMP amendment. [HFAC] STAFF RECOMMENDATION TO THE COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION (CCPC): That the CCPC forward petition PL20190002355/CP-2020-01 to the Board with a recommendation of approval to transmit to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity. COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION (CCPC) RECOMMENDATION: The Collier Packet Pg. 2055 17.D 05/25/2021 County Planning Commission held their required Transmittal public hearing on April 19, 2021. The CCPC recommended that the Board approve the PL20190002355/CP-2020-01 Resolution to transmit the petition to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity (vote: 510). RECOMMENDATION: To approve the Resolution and transmit the petition PL20190002355/CP-2020- 01 as approved by the Board at the transmittal hearing to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity and other statutorily required agencies, pursuant to Board action at Transmittal. Prepared by: James Sabo, AICP Comprehensive Planning Manager and Sue Faulkner, Principal Planner Comprehensive Planning Section, Zoning Division ATTACHMENT(S 1. Staff Report 4-5-21 (PDF) 2. Resolution - 042921 (PDF) 3. [Linked] CCPC Backup 4-1-21 (PDF) 4. Advertising (PDF) 5. NIM Docs Dec.9, 2020 (PDF) 6. BCC Hybrid Meeting Waiver (PDF) 7. AffidavitandSignPosting April 28 2021 (PDF) 8. legal ad - agenda ID 15665 (PDF) Packet Pg. 2056 17.D 05/25/2021 COLLIER COUNTY Board of County Commissioners Item Number: 17.1) Doc ID: 15665 Item Summary: Recommendation to approve a Resolution amending Ordinance No. 89-05, as amended, the Collier County Growth Management Plan for the unincorporated area of Collier County, Florida, specifically amending the Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub -Element of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan and the Rural Golden Gate Estates Future Land Use Map and Map Series to create the Immokalee Road/4th Street N.E. Mixed Use Subdistrict by changing the designation of the property from the Estates -Mixed Use District, Residential Estates Subdistrict to the Estates -Mixed Use District, Immokalee Road/4th Street N.E. Mixed Use Subdistrict, to allow uses permitted by right and conditional use in the General Commercial (C-4) zoning district with a total maximum intensity of up to 150,000 square feet of gross floor area of development, and a maximum of 400 residential dwelling units, and furthermore directing transmittal of the amendment to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity. The subject property is located on the northeast corner of the intersection of Immokalee Road and 4th street NE in Section 22, Township 48 North, Range 27 East, consisting of 50.18f acres. [PL20190002355] [Transmittal Hearing] Meeting Date: 05/25/2021 Prepared by: Title: Planner, Principal — Zoning Name: Sue Faulkner 04/23/2021 4:32 PM Submitted by: Title: Planner, Principal — Zoning Name: Anita Jenkins 04/23/2021 4:32 PM Approved By: Review: Zoning Zoning Growth Management Department County Attorney's Office Growth Management Department Growth Management Department Office of Management and Budget Office of Management and Budget County Attorney's Office County Manager's Office James Sabo Additional Reviewer Anita Jenkins Zoning Director Review Jeanne Marcella Additional Reviewer Heidi Ashton-Cicko Level 2 Attorney of Record Review James C French Additional Reviewer Trinity Scott Additional Reviewer Debra Windsor Level 3 OMB Gatekeeper Review Laura Zautcke Additional Reviewer Jeffrey A. Klatzkow Level 3 County Attorney's Office Review Sean Callahan Level 4 County Manager Review Completed 04/28/2021 5:03 PM Completed 05/03/2021 4:34 PM Completed 05/10/2021 9:51 AM Completed 05/18/2021 9:03 AM Completed 05/18/2021 3:19 PM Skipped 05/18/2021 3:26 PM Completed 05/18/2021 3:58 PM Completed 05/18/2021 4:39 PM Completed 05/19/2021 8:31 AM Completed 05/19/2021 12:23 PM Packet Pg. 2057 17.D 05/25/2021 Board of County Commissioners Geoffrey Willig Meeting Pending 05/25/2021 9:00 AM Packet Pg. 2058 17.D.1 Coer Co-►4-nty STAFF REPORT COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT, ZONING DIVISION COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING SECTION HEARING DATE: April 15, 2021 SUBJECT: PETITION CP-2020-1 / PL20190002355, GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN AMENDMENT [TRANSMITTAL HEARING] ELEMENT: RURAL GOLDEN GATE ESTATES SUB -ELEMENT OF THE GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN APPLICANTS/OWNERS/AGENTS: Collier County, a Political Subdivision of the State of Florida c/o Real Property Management 3335 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 101 Naples, Florida 34112 D. Wayne Arnold, AICP Richard D. Yovanovich, Esq. Q. Grady Minor and Associates, P. A. Coleman, Yovanovich & Koester, P.A 3800 Via Del Rey 4001 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 300 Bonita Springs, Florida 34134 Naples, Florida 34103 GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The subject property comprises approximately 50.18 acres and is located between 4th Street NE and Immokalee Road, south and west of Orange Tree Boulevard. The property has approximately 762 feet of frontage on 4th Street NE, and 2,200 feet of frontage on Immokalee Road. The property lies within the Rural Estates Planning Community, in Section 22, Township 48 South, Range 27 East. —1— CP-2020-1 / PL20190002355 Amending the Urban Mixed Use District to Establish the Immokalee Road/4th Street Mixed -Use Subdistrict in the Golden Gate Area Master Plan (GGAMP) Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub -Element Packet Pg. 2059 17.D.1 PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The petition is proposed to allow for new mixed, commercial and residential development, up to a maximum of 150,000 square feet of gross leasable floor area of C-4, General Commercial zoning district land uses, and, up to a maximum of 400 condominiums as (single-family or multi- family) residential units, or as apartments. The intent is to shift or transfer 140,000 square feet of the commercial floor area from the Estates Shopping Center project at the intersection of Wilson and Golden Gate Blvd to the Immokalee Road — 4th Street Commercial Subdistrict project. The proposal reduces the Estates Shopping Center project from 190,000 square feet of commercial to 50,000 square feet. REQUESTED ACTION: To establish a new Subdistrict in the Golden Gate Area Master Plan (GGAMP) Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub -Element text, and Rural Golden Gate Estates Future Land Use Map and Map Series of the Growth Management Plan (GMP) by: 1) Amending Policy 1.1.4 Estates — Mixed -Use District to add the Immokalee Road/4th Street Mixed -Use Subdistrict name where District and Subdistrict designations are identified, 2) Amending the Estates — Mixed -Use District to add the new Subdistrict provisions, to include those commercial uses in the C-4 zoning district, 3) Adding the title of the new Subdistrict map to the itemized Future Land Use Map Series listing, and 4) Amending the Future Land Use Map to depict the new Subdistrict, adding a new Future Land Use Map Series inset map that depicts the new Subdistrict. The Subdistrict language proposed by this amendment is found in Resolution Exhibit "A". SURROUNDING LAND USE, ZONING AND FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION:CD N Existing Conditions: J a Subject Property: The subject property is zoned E, Estates district and undeveloped. A 10-acre LO W parcel (the "Randall Curve" property), which is being held by the County for public uses, is not included here. The current Future Land Use designation is Estates — Mixed Use District, N Residential Estates Subdistrict, and allows single-family residential development; parks, recreation and open space uses; institutional uses, e.g., churches and places of worship, group r_ housing, nursing homes, social and fraternal organizations, public and private schools; a variety a of agricultural uses; and essential services. W Surrounding Lands: in North: Immediately north of the subject property is the (tentatively -designated) Immokalee Road — Estates Commercial Subdistrict. Properties further north along the 4th Street NE frontage E are developed residentially, while properties north along the Immokalee Rd. frontage are undeveloped. The Future Land Use designation for these land areas to the north is the Q Residential Estates Subdistrict. East: Immediately adjacent to the south and east is Immokalee Rd. Immediately east of the subject property, across Immokalee Rd. (a 6-lane divided arterial roadway) is zoned MPUD for the Orange Tree Mixed -Use Planned Unit Development, and developing as a mixed -use —2— CP-2020-1 / PL20190002355 Amending the Urban Mixed Use District to Establish the Immokalee Road/4th Street Mixed -Use Subdistrict in the Golden Gate Area Master Plan (GGAMP) Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub -Element Packet Pg. 2060 17.D.1 community. Further east, land is zoned Orange Blossom Ranch MPUD, developing with a residential community. The Future Land Use designation for these land areas to the east is Agricultural/Rural — Rural Settlement Area District. South: Immediately adjacent to the south is Immokalee Rd. Properties south, across Immokalee Rd., land are zoned MPUD for the Orange Tree Mixed -Use Planned Unit Development, and developing as a commercial component of the mixed -use community. Further south lies the Randall Blvd. Commercial Subdistrict West: Immediately west of the subject property, across 4th Street NE (a 2-lane undivided roadway) properties are zoned E, Estates district, and developed residentially. Then further west, land is zoned E, Estates, and contains parcels is land characterized by single-family residences and residential lots. These E-zoned parcels are within the Golden Gate Estates subdivision. The Future Land Use designation for these land areas to the west is the Residential Estates Subdistrict. In summary, the current zoning, and existing and planned land uses, in the area immediately surrounding the Subdistrict property are primarily suburban- and estate -type residences or residential lots to the north and west, while potential and tentative commercial properties lie to the east and south. BACKGROUND, CONSIDERATIONS AND ANALYSIS: This report addresses the minimum amount of [commercial] land needed to accommodate anticipated growth based on projected permanent and seasonal population of the area. This is accomplished through the analysis of the subject property and the surrounding area that includes inventorying the supply of existing commercially -developed and potential commercially - developable land, determining population growth, estimating the amount of commercial development that population will demand, and determining whether the Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub -Element of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan (GGAMP) allocates a sufficient amount of commercial land to accommodate growth. Goal 3 directs the County "to provide for limited commercial services and conditional uses for purposes of serving the rural needs of Golden Gate Estates residents, shortening vehicular trips, and preserving rural character." Objective 3.2 of the Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub -Element further directs the County "to provide for new commercial development within Neighborhood Centers and other Commercial Land Use Designations." These "other commercial land use designations" are addressed in Policy 3.2.1, which identifies a Randall Blvd. and Oil Well Rd. Corridor Study [2021]. This corridor study recognizes that future land uses be may be changed to commercial designations in this area. Appropriateness of the Site and the Change: Real Estate Econometrics, Inc. (REEI) provided a residential market analysis (August 26, 2020) and it is part of the supporting data & analysis submitted with GMPA application materials (Exhibit V.D.1.). The REEI research document analyzes the specific need for single-family, duplex, multiple -family, townhome, and group housing for seniors. The research is for 400 residential units and it does recognize that 400 low -density single-family units will not fit on the project parcel. Page 20 of the REEI report indicates that the supply of market rate rental apartments will turn negative in 2022. With the addition of the proposed 400 residential units, there will be a minimal —3— CP-2020-1 / PL20190002355 Amending the Urban Mixed Use District to Establish the Immokalee Road/4t" Street Mixed -Use Subdistrict in the Golden Gate Area Master Plan (GGAMP) Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub -Element Packet Pg. 2061 17.D.1 surplus through 2025. The REEI analysis contends that the subject property's 400 proposed apartment units will address the need for apartment units in 2022. Their analysis indicates that the projected population growth provides sufficient demand for market -based apartments. The proposed density is 8 DU/A. Regarding the GMP amendment, staff finds that the proposed GMP amendment is reasonably compatible with surrounding properties based on the RED residential market analysis. The rezone petition to implement the proposed subdistrict will need to address specific compatibility r measures, including maximum building height; landscape buffers, preserve area location, and i open space; building locations and minimum setbacks; and building massing and orientation. r Commercial Analysis The C-3, Commercial Intermediate, zoning district allows multi -family residential uses. Commercial Development: w Z Characteristics of the area immediately surrounding the subject property reveal a trend toward U) r commercial development. Existing and planned land uses in the area are primarily suburban - and estate -type residences or residential lots to the north and west, except to the east and south — where Commercial uses are planned. Within four miles from the subject property, commercial development is evident, including the following approved projects: o ♦ Orange Blossom Ranch commercial component (200,000 sq. ft./44.0 ac.) [±2.0 miles east E at Oil Well Rd.] (200,000 sq. ft. developable) a ♦ Orange Tree commercial component (332,000 sq. ft./33.3 ac.) [immediately east at the 2 Immokalee Rd. — Orange Tree Blvd. intersection] (53,342 sq. ft. developed — 278,658 sq. LO ft. developable) N ♦ Randall Boulevard Center (21,000 sq. ft./5.15 ac.) [±0.65 mile south at the Immokalee Rd. 0 — Randall Blvd. intersection] (3,350 sq. ft. developed — 17,650 sq. ft. developable) N ♦ Mir -Mar (20,000 sq. ft./2.38 ac.) [±0.66 mile south at the Immokalee Rd. — Randall Blvd. J a intersection] (19,000 sq. ft. developed — 1,000 sq. ft. developable) LO ♦ Wilson Boulevard Center (42,000 sq. ft.) [±4.0 road miles south at the Wilson Blvd. — Golden co LO Gate Blvd. intersection] (41,038 sq. ft. developed) N ♦ Heritage Bay PUD/DRI commercial component (230,000 sq. ft./73.5 ac.) [±2.0 miles east] L' (179,086 sq. ft. developed — 50,914 sq. ft. developable) ♦ Immokalee Road - Estates Commercial Subdistrict (200,000 sq. ft./19 ac.) adjacently north] 0 (200,000 sq. ft. developable) 0 These sites, generally located within the 15-minute drive -time market area currently provide more r N than 1.25 Million sq. ft. and 308 acres of commercial use opportunities in the [Urban Land Institute (ULI)-defined] Neighborhood Center, Community Center, and Regional Center development E categories, as revealed by the commercial needs analysis evaluated below. Generally, commercial development can be categorized as strip commercial, neighborhood Q commercial, community commercial, regional commercial, and so forth, based upon shopping center size, commercial uses, and population/area served. Based on specific studies and/or demographic data for an area, such as population, income, household size, percentage of income —4— CP-2020-1 / PL20190002355 Amending the Urban Mixed Use District to Establish the Immokalee Road/4t" Street Mixed -Use Subdistrict in the Golden Gate Area Master Plan (GGAMP) Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub -Element Packet Pg. 2062 17.D.1 spent on retail goods, etc., an analyst is able to estimate supportable commercial square feet for different commercial intensities for that geography by shopping center type. The petitioner characterizes development proposed for this Subdistrict as a community shopping center. The community shopping center is larger than a neighborhood center with neither a traditional department store nor the trade area of a regional shopping center. The Environmental Systems Research Institute (ESRI) calculates drive times and explains, in general, community centers have a drive time [market] area of 10 to 20 minutes depending on the size [given 192,700 sq. ft. average total floor space & 177,328 sq. ft. median floor space]. Petitioner's Commercial Needs Analysis: The firm of RED conducted a Commercial Needs Analysis, updated to August 26, 2020 independently analyzing market conditions for this petition (Exhibit "V.D1 "). This analysis provides D context for assessing a specific selection of goods and services' requirements of the emerging W population within the market area identified. Z U) The Analysis provided the following data and analysis: r Population Growth Around Subject Property This section provided an overview of population growth (utilizing 2018 figures) and applied a multiplier to estimate and forecast populations on which to base the remainder of the Analysis. o The Analysis identified a 15-minute drive time as its market area for this medium -size community E shopping center. This 15-minute drive time area is delineated in this figure, copied from the a Analysis. 2 0 For their evaluation, a continuing increase in population was utilized. It estimates a 54,431 LO population for the market area in 2020, and projects 70,862 people in 2030, and 99,100 people N in 2040. g Market Area Demand a� o Countywide population figures were then apportioned to the 15-minute drive time market area to N J a represent any additional commercial demand for this location. This calculation yielded a demand LO of 22.29 sq. ft. of commercial space per capita. ;° The market area can support 1,213,473 sq. ft. of all commercial needs in this market area at this V_ time; 1,579,788 sq. ft. of commercial needs in this market area by 2030; and 2,209,305 sq. ft. of commercial needs in this market area by 2040. (Table 7) Market Area Supply The applicant's Needs Analysis inventoried 725,404 sq. ft. of existing commercial development (on 114.54 ac.) of developed "competing commercial parcels" located in the market area. in The Needs Analysis inventoried (approximately 701,050 sq. ft. of undeveloped commercial) on 110.69 acres of undeveloped "competing parcels" located in the market area. E The supply analysis suggests no less than 1,426,467 sq. ft. of developed and undeveloped commercial space is available in the market area. Their total supply figure of 1,761,404 accounts Q for commercial locations with potential, approved -but -undeveloped, to -be -transferred and other similar square footage. —5— CP-2020-1 / PL20190002355 Amending the Urban Mixed Use District to Establish the Immokalee Road/4t" Street Mixed -Use Subdistrict in the Golden Gate Area Master Plan (GGAMP) Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub -Element Packet Pg. 2063 17.D.1 Note: the CIGM identifies a supply of 1, 691,857 sq. ft. developed and undeveloped commercial space available in the market area. Supply — Demand Analysis This section applied a diminishing allocation ratio, allowing the market to function in the sale, usage and allocation of land over time. This suggests the growing market area can support the additional commercial uses (2,209,305 Demand/1,691,857 Supply = 517,448 total sq. ft. Demand) in this market by 2040). Staff Assessment of Petitioner's Commercial Needs Analvsis The Collier Interactive Growth Model (CIGM) characterizes development proposed for this Subdistrict as a community shopping center. All development in this area is proposed by staff as limited to "community commercial" center C-3 intensity uses, which is less commercial intensity than the proposed C-4 by the applicant. Staff assesses this C-3 limitation to be a fair and uniform application of the CIGM. The analysis provided in the Needs Analysis is an objective population -based demand methodology and suspends our reliance on evaluating certain types of businesses to demonstrate need. Not all commercial uses allowed in the C-4, General Commercial zoning district — by right and by Conditional Use, as proposed — were analyzed however, and not all uses analyzed were demonstrated to have supportable demand. The intensities of C-4 commercial uses and activities allowing for the outside storage of merchandise, such as automobile sales, rental and leasing, marine vessel and recreational vehicle (RV) dealers, and the renting and leasing of equipment; mini- and self -storage warehousing; hotels and motels; and, certain entertainment and recreational attractions are disparate with low density single-family residential areas. These disparities, if allowed by this Subdistrict, introduce incompatibilities between potentially non -complimentary land uses that may not be overcome in rezoning. This uncertainty leads staff to consider a lower commercial intensity for the Subdistrict overall, and to defer review of any Conditional Use proposed. The uses shown to be appropriately suited to "community commercial" centers are: apparel and accessory stores, auto and home supply stores, building cleaning and maintenance services, cable and other pay television services including communications towers up to specified height, subject to section 5.05.09, carwashes provided that carwashes abutting residential zoning districts shall be subject to section 5.05.11 of this code, computer and computer software stores, dance studios, schools and halls, indoor, department stores, disinfecting and pest control services, eating and drinking establishments excluding bottle clubs. all establishments engaged in the retail sale of alcoholic beverages for on -premise consumption are subject to the Iocational requirements of section 5.05.01, electrical and electronic repair shops, food stores, general merchandise stores, hardware stores, home furniture and furnishings stores, household appliance stores, medical and dental laboratories, musical instrument stores, nursing and professional care facilities, paint stores, personal services, miscellaneous, radio, television and consumer electronics stores, repair services - miscellaneous (except agricultural equipment repair, awning repair, beer pump coil cleaning and repair, blacksmith shops, catch basin, septic tank and cesspool cleaning, industrial truck repair, machinery cleaning, repair of service station equipment, boiler cleaning, tinsmithing, tractor repair), research, development and testing services, retail — miscellaneous, telephone communications including communications towers up —6— CP-2020-1 / PL20190002355 Amending the Urban Mixed Use District to Establish the Immokalee Road/4t" Street Mixed -Use Subdistrict in the Golden Gate Area Master Plan (GGAMP) Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub -Element Packet Pg. 2064 17.D.1 to specified height, subject to section 5.05.09, veterinary services, excluding outside kenneling, and watch, clock and jewelry repair. The County's CIGM provides for an average 8,878 sq. ft. of commercial floor space/acre in community commercial centers. Just as the County approved for the Immokalee Road — Estates Commercial Subdistrict located adjacently north, the proposed Subdistrict is recommended to be limited to the same C-3 intensity of uses suited to "community commercial" centers. This amounts to a lower commercial intensity (than is proposed) of overall commercial floor space. Additionally, the intensities of the commercial uses themselves, only where shown to be appropriately suited to "community commercial" centers, and approved by the companion Planned Unit Development rezone will be supported. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS: An Environmental Report, dated September 2019, prepared by Marco Espinar of Collier Environmental Consultants, Inc. was submitted with this petition (Exhibit W.C"). Environmental review specialists with Collier County's Development Review Division, Environmental Planning Section reviewed these documents and provided the following comments: The proposed GMP amendment has no effect on the requirements of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME) of the GMP. Native vegetation on site will be retained in accordance with the requirements of CCME Policy 6.1.1 and section 3.05.07 of the LDC. Regarding Flood Zone Information for PL20190002355: The planning project includes the following parcels: 37690040003 and 37690040100, as shown on the following snip from the Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) as shown on ArcReader. The yellow and purple areas marked X and X500 flood zones are not in the Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA). These flood zones are moderate to low risk and do not have assigned base flood —7— CP-2020-1 / PL20190002355 Amending the Urban Mixed Use District to Establish the Immokalee Road/4t" Street Mixed -Use Subdistrict in the Golden Gate Area Master Plan (GGAMP) Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub -Element Packet Pg. 2065 17.D.1 elevations (BFEs). The remaining beige areas are flood zone AH, are within the SFHA, and do have BFEs. There are four BFEs for those areas within the SFHA. These are labeled as sections A, B, C, and D. The section marked A is for all of the SFHA section west of the 14.5' contour line. This same contour line carries through the areas marked X and X500. This same principle works for the other sections. The SFHA west of this contour line (marked A) has a BFE of 14.5' NAVD. The SFHA between the 14.5' and 15' contour lines (marked B) has a BFE of 15' NAVD. The SFHA between the 15' and 15.5' contour lines (marked C) has a BFE of 15.5' NAVD. The SFHA east of the 15.5' contour line (marked D) has a BFE of 16' NAVD. a -s- CP-2020-1 / PL20190002355 Amending the Urban Mixed Use District to Establish the Immokalee Road/4t" Street Mixed -Use Subdistrict in the Golden Gate Area Master Plan (GGAMP) Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub -Element Packet Pg. 2066 17.D.1 TRAFFIC CAPACITYITRAFFIC CIRCULATION IMPACT ANALYSIS, INCLUDING TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT CONSISTENCY DETERMINATION: JMB Transportation Engineering, Inc., submitted a Traffic Impact Statement, updated to 10/27/2020 (Exhibit W.E1"). The project's area of influence was determined to be Immokalee Road north (east) and south (west) of the project at the Randall Boulevard intersection. The analysis studied: • Immokalee Rd., from Collier Blvd. (west) to north of Oil Well Rd. (east); • Vanderbilt Beach Road, CR 951 to Wilson; • Wilson Blvd., south of Immokalee Rd. to Golden Gate; • Oil Well Rd., from Immokalee Rd. to Desoto; • Randall Blvd., from Immokalee Rd. to Desoto; and those roadways with lesser anticipated trip distribution, and, - Everglades Blvd., from VBR to Randall; Fully 100% of traffic accessing the property comes from Immokalee Rd. (15% southbound /westbound; 85% northbound/eastbound). Based on the traffic impact analysis, the proposed mixed -use project is a significant traffic generator for the roadway network at this location. The proposed mixed -use project would generate (approximately) 8,924 daily gross new trips (2- way) and 753 PM Peak Hour gross new trips routed through two, limited access points, located along the curve in Immokalee Road, commercial frontage, and, through interconnection with the developing commercial project located adjacently north. No access onto 4t" Street NE is proposed. Together, commercial development and residential development will work together and be limited by this 753 PM Peak Hour gross new trip figure. Policy 3.2.1 of the Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub -Element also identifies a Randall Blvd. and Oil Well Rd. Corridor Study, after which, an Immokalee Rd./Randall Blvd. Planning Study will evaluate the future land uses along Immokalee Rd. and may propose changes to future land uses. PUBLIC FACILITIES IMPACTS: Application materials submitted include a Public Facilities Level of Service Analysis, updated to August 29, 2019 (Exhibit "V.E"), along with a Public Facilities Map. Issues and concerns are identified regarding impacts on potable water, wastewater management, solid waste, drainage, park and recreational facilities, schools, or EMS and fire control services. • Potable Water System: The subject project lies in the Collier County Water -Sewer District's Regional Water Service Area and development will be served by Collier County Public Utilities. The proposed Subdistrict will impact the potable water system based on population as follows: o Proposed 400 residential units demand is 216,000 gpd o Proposed commercial use demand is 33,750 gpd FINDING: Comprehensive Planning finds no adverse impacts to the potable water facilities. • Wastewater Treatment System: The subject project currently lies in the service area of a wastewater reclamation facility. The property, however, lies adjacent to the Collier County Water -Sewer District's North Regional Wastewater Service Area. The proposed Subdistrict —9— CP-2020-1 / PL20190002355 Amending the Urban Mixed Use District to Establish the Immokalee Road/4t" Street Mixed -Use Subdistrict in the Golden Gate Area Master Plan (GGAMP) Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub -Element Packet Pg. 2067 17.D.1 will have no impact on the wastewater treatment system since the level of service (LOS) standard is based on population. FINDING: Comprehensive Planning finds no adverse impacts to the wastewater treatment and collection facilities. • Solid Waste Collection and Disposal: The solid waste disposal service provider is Collier County Solid Waste Management. The average daily disposal rate for the mixed -use project is estimated at 1,000 lbs. per day, with an estimated annual disposal of 273,750 lbs., or 292 tons. The AUIR recognizes that the County has approximately 42 years (2061) of remaining landfill capacity, but will reach its additional permitted capacity by or before 2051. FINDING: Comprehensive Planning finds no adverse impacts to the solid waste collection and disposal system. • Stormwater Management System: The 2020 AUIR does not identify any stormwater management improvement projects in the vicinity of the subject property. Future development will comply with the SFWMD and/or Collier County rules and regulations that assure controlled accommodation of stormwater events by both on -site and off -site improvements. FINDING: Comprehensive Planning finds no adverse impacts to the stormwater management system. • Park and Recreational Facilities: No effect on the demand for community and regional is identified in this Analysis on park facilities result from the proposed Subdistrict. This residential development represents approximately 400 residential units or apartments and more than 380 residents. FINDING: Comprehensive Planning finds no adverse impacts to the Parks and Recreation facilities. • Schools: The Analysis identifies no demand for public school facilities resulting from the proposed Subdistrict. Multi -family residential development is allowed by its C-3 zoning, however. This residential development represents approximately 400 residential units or apartments and more than 60 students. FINDING: Comprehensive Planning finds no adverse impacts to the schools. • Fire & Rescue, Emergency Medical (EMS), and Sheriff's Services: • Fire protection and response services are provided by the North Collier Fire & Rescue District, with District Station 10 (located at 13240 Immokalee Rd.) located approximately on -half of a mile (0.5) from the site. • Emergency Medical services are provided by the Collier County Bureau of Emergency Services, with EMS Station 10 (located at 14596 Immokalee Rd.) located within one-half mile (0.40) from the site. • Protection services are provided by the Collier County Sherriff's Office, with District 4 Substation (located at 14750 Immokalee Rd.) located within one-half mile (0.40) from the site. FINDING: Comprehensive Planning finds no adverse impacts to the emergency services. —10— CP-2020-1 / PL20190002355 Amending the Urban Mixed Use District to Establish the Immokalee Road/4t" Street Mixed -Use Subdistrict in the Golden Gate Area Master Plan (GGAMP) Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub -Element Packet Pg. 2068 17.D.1 NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING (NIM) SYNOPSIS: A Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM) required by LDC Section 10.03.05.E was [duly advertised, noticed and] held on Wednesday, December 09, 2020, 5:30 p.m. at North Collier Regional Park, Conference Room A, 15000 Livingston Road, Naples . Approximately 20 people attended in -person and 4 people via Zoom connections, other than the application team and County staff attended — and heard the following information: The agents representing this petition (Rich Yovanovich, D. Wayne Arnold) introduced other members of the application team present. They also introduced staff Planner representing Collier County — Corby Schmidt, AICP, Principal Planner and project coordinator for the GMP amendment petition. Mr. Yovanovich identified the two subject property's locations , fronting on 4th Street NE, and on Immokalee Rd. at the Randall Blvd. intersection. He described the proposed commercial development of 150,000 sq. ft. of C-4 intensity, both by - right and conditional use commercial uses, multi -family residential uses, that the new Subdistrict would allow. A Zoom caller asked about the multi -family product planned for the development. Mr. Arnold answered that these could be houses or multi -family, condos or apartments. Mr. Yovanovich added how no vehicular access will be allowed to/from 4th St. Mr. Arnold added that the property located to the north also removed their proposed access to 4th St. The information meeting was completed by 6:20 p.m. The applicant transcribed the full proceedings of this meeting, and that transcript, along with their PowerPoint presentation and presentation notes have been copied and are on record. [Synopsis prepared by C. Schmidt, AICP, Principal Planner] FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS: The reviews and analyses of this petition provide the following findings and conclusions: a • The 50.18-acre total size subject property is designated E, Estates and undeveloped. LO LO • The infrastructure needed to serve the development can be provided without related levels of service or concurrency concerns. N • The proposed mixed -use project will generate additional traffic for the roadway network at this location. Additional potential traffic may impact the surrounding areas. Commercial a development and residential development will be limited by a 753 PM Peak Hour gross trip figure. r • The Collier Interactive Growth Model (CIGM) characterizes development proposed for this CO Subdistrict as a community shopping center. All development in this area is being limited to r a "community commercial" center C-3 intensity uses, and amounts to a lower commercial intensity than is proposed by the C-4 zoning district. Staff assesses this C-3 limitation to be a fair and uniform application of the CIGM. Q • The 400 residential dwelling units or apartments make a density footprint of approximately eight (8) dwelling units per acre — while the density in the surrounding residential area is about —11— CP-2020-1 / PL20190002355 Amending the Urban Mixed Use District to Establish the Immokalee Road/4th Street Mixed -Use Subdistrict in the Golden Gate Area Master Plan (GGAMP) Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub -Element Packet Pg. 2069 17.D.1 1 dwelling unit per 2.5 to 5.0 acres. No provisions for housing affordability are part of the applicant's proposal. • The proposed Subdistrict will have impacts on the potable water, wastewater treatment systems and other public facilities since the level of service (LOS) standards are based on population. No adverse impacts were found. • The property, along with much of the surrounding area, is currently designated in the Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub -Element for commercial development. This petition introduces new mixed -use development, uses and activities to a location where such development is planned. • Sites generally located within the market area currently provide more than 1.25 Million sq. ft. and 308 acres of commercial use opportunities. Approximately 132 of these commercial acres are undeveloped. • Speakers present at the Neighborhood Information Meeting objected to allowing commercial traffic onto 4th Street NE, as this is a quiet street with only residences and residential traffic, and agreed with the proposals that would allow entirely no vehicular access. IDENTIFICATION AND ANALYSIS OF THE PERTINENT REQUIREMENTS FOR COMPREHENSIVE PLANS AND PLAN AMENDMENTS ARE NOTED IN CHAPTER 163, F.S., SPECIFICALLY SECTIONS 163.3177(6)(A) 2. AND 8.: Considerations required for the adoption of a comprehensive plan amendment are listed below. 2. The future land use plan and plan amendments shall be based upon surveys, studies, and data regarding the area, as applicable, including: a. The amount of land required to accommodate anticipated growth. b. The projected permanent and seasonal population of the area. c. The character of undeveloped land. d. The availability of water supplies, public facilities, and services. e. The need for redevelopment, including the renewal of blighted areas and the elimination of nonconforming uses which are inconsistent with the character of the community. f. The compatibility of uses on lands adjacent to or closely proximate to military installations. g. The compatibility of uses on lands adjacent to an airport as defined in s. 330.35 and consistent with s. 333.02. h. The discouragement of urban sprawl. i. The need for job creation, capital investment, and economic development that will strengthen and diversify the community's economy. j. The need to modify land uses and development patterns within antiquated subdivisions. 8. Future land use map amendments shall be based upon the following analyses: a. An analysis of the availability of facilities and services. b. An analysis of the suitability of the plan amendment for its proposed use considering the character of the undeveloped land, soils, topography, natural resources, and historic resources on site. —12— CP-2020-1 / PL20190002355 Amending the Urban Mixed Use District to Establish the Immokalee Road/4t" Street Mixed -Use Subdistrict in the Golden Gate Area Master Plan (GGAMP) Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub -Element Packet Pg. 2070 17.D.1 c. An analysis of the minimum amount of land needed to achieve the goals and requirements of this section. It is incumbent upon the petitioner to provide appropriate and relevant data and analysis to address the statutory requirements for a Plan amendment, then present and defend, as necessary, that data and analysis. LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: A copy of this Staff Report was provided to the Office of the County Attorney and has been approved as to form and legality. The criteria for growth management plan amendments and land use map amendments are in Sections 163.3177(1)(f) and 163.3177(6)(a)2. and 8., Florida Statutes. This staff report was reviewed by the County Attorney's Office on March 26, 2021. [HFAC] STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the County Planning Commission forward Petition CP-2020-1 / PL20190002355, to the Board of County Commissioners with a recommendation to approve for transmittal to the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity with the following modifications - for proper code language, format, clarity, etc. - as depicted below: Note: Words underlined are added, words StFUGk through are deleted - as proposed by petitioner; words double underlined are added, words are deleted - as proposed by staff. Italicized text within brackets is explanatory only - not to be adopted. I. IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY [Page 11 A. GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** Policy 1.1.4: 1. ESTATES - MIXED USE DISTRICT 1. Residential Estates Subdistrict 2. Neighborhood Center Subdistrict *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** 5. Everglades -- Randall Subdistrict 6. Immokalee Road/41" Street NE Mixed Use Subdistrict *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** LAND USE DESIGNATION DESCRIPTION SECTION *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** 1. ESTAES DESIGNATION *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** A. Estates - Mixed -Use District [beginning page 9] a -13- CP-2020-1 / PL20190002355 Amending the Urban Mixed Use District to Establish the Immokalee Road/4t" Street Mixed -Use Subdistrict in the Golden Gate Area Master Plan (GGAMP) Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub -Element Packet Pg. 2071 17.D.1 *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** 6. Immokalee Road/4th Street NE Mixed Use Subdistrict [page 16] This Subdistrict is approximately 50.18± acres in size and is located on the northeast corner of Immokalee Road and 4th Street NE. The Immokalee Road/4th Street NE Mixed Use Subdistrict is intended to provide a variety of commercial, office and residential land uses. Development within the Subdistrict shall be subject to the following: a. The subdistrict shall be rezoned to a Planned Unit Development (PUD b. The rezone Ordinance must include standards for a common architectural theme as well as development standards and buffers to insure compatibility with surrounding properties. c. Allowable commercial uses shall be limited to those permitted by right and by conditional uses in the �4 C-3 , Commercial Intermediate zoning district, as listed in the Collier County Land Development Code, Ordinance No. 04-41, as amPndpd d. Development is limited to a maximum intensity of 150,000 square feet of gross floor area and a maximum of 400 residential dwelling units. e. In any combination of uses, the trip cap of 753 daily (2-way) PM Peak Hour gross new trips shall be the maximum limiting -factor for this Subdistrict. In lieu of the preservation requirement in Policy 6.1.1 of the CCME, fifteen (15) percent of the on -site native vegetation shall be retained, which shall principally be located adjacent to 4th Street NE to serve as a preserve and buffer to nearby residences. The minimum buffer width adjacent to 4th Street NE shall be 75 feet for that portion of the subdistrict located north of the previously cleared portion of the site utilized for Collier County stormwater management. g. The water management system serving development within the subdistrict shall provide for the water quality pretreatment and attenuation for that portion of the Property originally designed to be utilized for water management area for Immokalee Road; however, the area necessary to provide for required Immokalee Road water management may be relocated throughout the subdistrict. Permitting for the overall water management shall be coordinated through Collier County and permitted by the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD). *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** C. List of maps [page 27] Rural Golden Gate Estates Future Land Use Map Rural Golden Gate Estates Neighborhood Centers Wilson Boulevard/Golden Gate Boulevard Center Golden Gate Boulevard/Everglades Boulevard Center Immokalee Road/Everglades Boulevard Center Randall Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict —14— CP-2020-1 / PL20190002355 Amending the Urban Mixed Use District to Establish the Immokalee Road/4t" Street Mixed -Use Subdistrict in the Golden Gate Area Master Plan (GGAMP) Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub -Element Packet Pg. 2072 17.D.1 Mission Subdistrict Estates Shopping Center Subdistrict Estates Shopping Center Subdistrict Conceptual Plan Everglades —Randall Subdistrict Immokalee Road/Randall Boulevard Planning Study Area Immokalee Road/4th Street NE Mixed Use Subdistrict PETITION No.: CP-2020-1 / PL20190002355 Staff Report for the April 15, 2021, CCPC meeting. NOTE: This petition has been tentatively scheduled for the May 25, 2021, BCC meeting. GACDES Planning Services\Comprehensive\Comp Planning GMP DATA\Comp Plan Amendments\2020 Cycles & Smalls\CP-20-1, Immokalee Rd-4th St Subd GGAMP\CCPC\CP-20-1 Immok Rd-4th St ST Rprt_REV8.5 FNL.docx —15— CP-2020-1 / PL20190002355 Amending the Urban Mixed Use District to Establish the Immokalee Road/4th Street Mixed -Use Subdistrict in the Golden Gate Area Master Plan (GGAMP) Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub -Element Packet Pg. 2073 17.D.2 RESOLUTION NO. 2021- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA PROPOSING AMENDMENT TO ORDINANCE NO. 89-05, AS AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, SPECIFICALLY AMENDING THE RURAL GOLDEN GATE ESTATES SUB -ELEMENT OF THE GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN AND THE RURAL GOLDEN GATE ESTATES FUTURE LAND USE MAP AND MAP SERIES TO CREATE THE IMMOKALEE ROAD/4TH STREET N.E. MIXED USE SUBDISTRICT BY CHANGING THE DESIGNATION OF THE PROPERTY FROM THE ESTATES -MIXED USE DISTRICT, RESIDENTIAL ESTATES SUBDISTRICT TO THE ESTATES -MIXED USE DISTRICT, IMMOKALEE ROAD/4TH STREET N.E. MIXED USE SUBDISTRICT, TO ALLOW USES PERMITTED BY RIGHT AND CONDITIONAL USE IN THE GENERAL COMMERCIAL (C-4) ZONING DISTRICT WITH A TOTAL MAXIMUM INTENSITY OF UP TO 150,000 SQUARE FEET OF GROSS FLOOR AREA OF DEVELOPMENT, AND A MAXIMUM OF 400 RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS, AND FURTHERMORE DIRECTING TRANSMITTAL OF THE AMENDMENT TO THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE INTERSECTION OF IMMOKALEE ROAD AND 4TH STREET NE IN SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 48 NORTH, RANGE 27 EAST, CONSISTING OF 50.18f ACRES. [PL20190002355] WHEREAS, Collier County, pursuant to Section 163.3161, et. sea., Florida Statutes, the Florida Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act, was required to prepare and adopt a comprehensive plan; and WHEREAS, the Collier County Board of County Commissioners adopted the Collier County Growth Management Plan on January 10, 1989; and WHEREAS, the Community Planning Act of 2011 provides authority for local governments to amend their respective comprehensive plans and outlines certain procedures to amend adopted comprehensive plans; and WHEREAS, Richard D. Yovanovich as Successor Trustee of Land Trust Numbers 850.024 and 850.031 under the Land Trust Agreement dated December 1, 2005, Land Trust Number 850.045 under the Land Trust Agreement dated June 10, 2009, and the Golden Gate Boulevard West Trust, requested an amendment to the Rural Golden Gate Estates -Sub -element of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan and the Rural Golden Gate Estates Future Land Use Map and Map Series to add the Immokalee Road/4th Street NE Mixed Use Subdistrict; and [20-CMP-01075/ 1628099/ 1179 4/29/21 Pagel of 2 Words underlined are added, words stmek flffeugh have been deleted. Packet Pg. 2074 17.D.2 WHEREAS, on April 19, 2021, the Collier County Planning Commission considered the proposed amendment to the Growth Management Plan pursuant to the authority granted to it by Section 163.3174, F.S., and has recommended approval of said amendment to the Board of County Commissioners; and WHEREAS, on , the Board of County Commissioners at a public hearing approved the transmittal of the proposed amendment to the state land planning agency in accordance with Section 163.3184, F.S.; and WHEREAS, upon receipt of Collier County's proposed Growth Management Plan Amendment, various State agencies and the Department of Economic Opportunity (DEO) have thirty (30) days to review the proposed amendment and DEO must transmit, in writing, to Collier County its comments within said thirty (30) days pursuant to Section 163.3184, F.S.; and WHEREAS, Collier County, upon receipt of the written comments from DEO must adopt, adopt with changes or not adopt the proposed Growth Management Plan Amendment within one hundred and eighty (180) days of such receipt pursuant to Section 163.3184, F.S.; and WHEREAS, the DEO, within five (5) days of receipt of Collier County's adopted Growth Management Plan Amendment, must notify the County of any deficiencies of the Plan Amendment pursuant to Section 163.3184(3), F.S. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA that: The Board of County Commissioners hereby approves the proposed Growth Management Plan Amendment, attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated by reference herein, for the purpose of transmittal to the Department of Economic Opportunity and other reviewing agencies thereby initiating the required State evaluation of the Growth Management Plan Amendment prior to final adoption. THIS RESOLUTION ADOPTED after motion, second and majority this day of 2021 . ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS CRYSTAL K. KINZEL, CLERK Deputy Clerk Approved as to form and legality: Y�t�,Uti\ Heidi Ashton-Cicko Managing Assistant County Attorney COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA Penny Taylor, Chairman Attachment: Exhibit A — Proposed Text Amendment & Map Amendment [20-CMP-0 1075/1628099/1179 4/29/21 Page 2 of 2 Words underlined are added, words struoL� = have been deleted. Packet Pg. 2075 PL20190002355/ CP2020-1 March 2, 2021 17.D.2 EXHIBIT A GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN RURAL GOLDEN GATE ESTATES SUB- ELEMENT Note: Words underlined are added, words struck through are deleted. Italicized text within brackets is explanatory only - not to be adopted. Table of Contents A. Goals, Objectives, and Policies B. Land Use Designation Description Section 1. ESTATES DESIGNATION A. ESTATES - MIXED USE DISTRICT 1. Residential Estates Subdistrict 2. Neighborhood Center Subdistrict 3. Conditional Uses Subdistrict 4. Mission Subdistrict 5. Everglades - Randall Subdistrict 6. Immokalee Road/4'h Street N.E. Mixed Use Subdistrict *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** C. List of maps Rural Golden Gate Estates Future Land Use Map Rural Golden Gate Estates Neighborhood Centers Wilson Boulevard/Golden Gate Boulevard Center Golden Gate Boulevard/Everglades Boulevard Center Immokalee Road/Everglades Boulevard Center Randall Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict Mission Subdistrict Estates Shopping Center Subdistrict Estates Shopping Center Subdistrict Conceptual Plan Everglades -Randall Subdistrict Immokalee Road/Randall Boulevard Planning Study Area Immokalee Road/4th Street N.E. Mixed Use Subdistrict A. GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES GOAL 1: *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** Words underlined are added; words rtFWGc—thmugh are deletions [beginning page 9] [page 27] Page 1 of 5 N N 0 c 0 r 0 0 W aD c aD E r Q Packet Pg. 2076 PL20190002355/ CP2020-1 March 2, 2021 17.D.2 Policy 1.1.4: Page 1 The ESTATES Future Land Use Designation shall include Future Land Use Districts and Subdistricts for: A. ESTATES — MIXED USE DISTRICT 1. Residential Estates Subdistrict 2. Neighborhood Center Subdistrict 3. Conditional Uses Subdistrict 4. Mission Subdistrict 5. Everglades — Randall Subdistrict 6. Immokalee Road/41h Street N.E. Mixed Use Subdistrict *** *** *** *** text break B. LAND USE DESIGNATION DESCRIPTION SECTION Page 9 *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** 1. ESTATES DESIGNATION *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** A. Estates — Mixed -Use District [beginning page 9] *** *** *** *** text break *** *** *** *** 6. Immokalee Road/4th Street NE Mixed Use Subdistrict [page 16] This Subdistrict is approximately 50.18± acres in size and is located on the northeast corner of L° Immokalee Road and 4th Street N.E. The Immokalee Road/4th Street NE Mixed Use Subdistrict is intended to provide a variety of commercial, office and residential land uses. N Development within the Subdistrict shall be subject to the following: 0 a. The subdistrict shall be rezoned to a Planned Unit Development (PUD). c 0 b. The rezone Ordinance must include standards for a common architectural theme as well o as development standards and buffers to insure compatibility with surrounding properties. r c. Allowable commercial uses shall be limited to those permitted by right and by conditional uses in the C-4 Commercial General zoning district, as listed in the Collier County Land E Development Code, Ordinance No. 04-41, as amended. r w Q d. Development is limited to a maximum intensitv of 150,000 square feet of gross floor area and a maximum of 400 residential dwelling units. Words underlined are added; words StFUGk thFGugh are deletions Page 2 of 5 Packet Pg. 2077 PL20190002355/ CP2020-1 March 2, 2021 17.D.2 e. In lieu of the preservation requirement in Policy 6 1 1 of the CCME fifteen (15) percent of the on -site native vegetation shall be retained, which shall principally be located adjacent to 4th Street N.E. to serve as a preserve and buffer to nearby residences. The minimum buffer width adjacent to 4th Street N.E. shall be 75 feet for that portion of the subdistrict located north of the previously cleared portion of the site utilized for Collier County stormwater management. The water management system serving development within the subdistrict shall provide for the water quality pretreatment and attenuation for that portion of the property originally designed to be utilized for water management area for Immokalee Road; however, the area necessary to provide for required Immokalee Road water management may be relocated throughout the subdistrict. Permitting for the overall water management shall be coordinated through Collier County and permitted by the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD). *** *** *** *** text break C. List of maps [page 27] Rural Golden Gate Estates Future Land Use Map Rural Golden Gate Estates Neighborhood Centers Wilson Boulevard/Golden Gate Boulevard Neighborhood Center Golden Gate Boulevard/Everglades Boulevard Neighborhood Center Immokalee Road/Everglades Boulevard Neighborhood Center Randall Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict Mission Subdistrict Estates Shopping Center Subdistrict Estates Shopping Center Subdistrict Conceptual Plan Everglades —Randall Subdistrict Immokalee Road/Randall Boulevard Planning Study Area Immokalee Road/4th Street N.E. Mixed Use Subdistrict Words underlined are added; words s#rU & thfeagh are deletions Page 3 of 5 Packet Pg. 2078 17.D.2 EXHIBIT A PL20190002355/CP-20-1 IMMOKALEE ROAD 4TH STREET SUBDISTRICT O/ COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA SUBJECT SITE I 0 250 500 1,000 Feet ADOPTED - XXXX, XXXX (Ord. No. XXXX-X) PREPARED BY: BETH YANG, AICP GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPT FILE: IMMOKALEE RD COMMERCIAL CENTER SUBDISTRICT LOCATION MAP DRAFT.MXD DATE: JUNE 2020 LEGEND IMMOKALEE ROAD - 4TH STREET SUBDISTRICT V N :a N w z Cn d as m O E E Q a Ln Ln M N O O O O O N J a Ln m to Ln N CD N O C O r 7 O to O C O E t V m ++ Q Page 41 Packet Pg. 2079 ESTATES DESIGNATION AGRICULTURAL I RURAL DESIGNATION MIXED USE.STRICT quni9wnmm�nrea pvo-ia q arYei EeYM euMYma Coneniorei uses Suetlipgq OVERLAYS AND SPECIAL FEATURES = EaeonS�arwe sgmomna ®aeeoun vmYceonnm Dremv M.IERCAL DISTRICT _ q mpBwlrvera cammmcei summmcl EXHIBIT "A" O/ r ® E Ym slwpgrycemer3uYlmYa ' � � immeaYe goes em suYR soeam�a Immokalee Road - 4th Street Subdistrict II� - H VAND RBILT PINE R GE RD ❑ K 2 ❑ I VANDERBILT ---__—— —' BEACH RD, z ❑ Iw u m ZQ 0 GOLDEN GATE BLVD Ua, � rr O INTERSTATE 75 DAMS BLVD S.R. 84 15 D: Ea0 fA N RURAL GOLDEN GATE FUTURE LAND USE MAP DOPTED - SEPTEMBER 24, 2019 AMENDED -XXXX, XXXX I � F— O 0 0.5 1 2 3 Miles 17.D.2 PETITION PL20190002355/CP-20-1 RURAL GOLDEN GATE ESTATES FUTURE LAND USE MAP IMMOKALEE RD GATE BLVD m 0 w OILWELLRD z m0 O 0 rn I m 0 O w ❑ INTERSTATE 75 Q R26E R27E R28E I R29E Page 5 of Packet Pg. 2080 17. D.4 F-ilii0-6CE 6F PUBLIC HEARING I Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the Collier County Planning Commission sitting as the local planning agency and the Environmental Advisory Council, at 9b0 A.M., April 1, 2021, in the, Board of County Commissioners Meeting Room, Third Floor, Collier Government Center, 3299 East Tamiami Trail, Naples FL., to consider: A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA PROPOSING AMENDMENT TO ORDINANCE NO. 89-05, AS AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH,MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COWER COUNTY, FLORIDA, SPECIFICALLY AMENDING THE RURAL GOLDEN GATE ESTATES SUB -ELEMENT OF THE GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN AND THE RURAL GOLDEN GATE ESTATES FUTURE LAND USE MAP AND MAP SERIES TO CREATE THE IMMOKALEE R0AD/4TH STREET N.E. MIXED USE SUBDISTRICT BY CHANGING THE DESIGNATION OF THE PROPERTY FROM THE ESTATES -MIXED USE DISTRICT, RESIDENTIAU ESTATES SUBDISTRICT TO THE ESTATES -MIXED USE DISTRICT, IMMOKALEE ROAD/4TH STREET N.E MIXED USE SUBDISTRICT, TO ALLOW USES PERMITTED BY RIGHT AND CONDITIONAL USE IN THE GENERAL COMMERCIAL (C-4) ZONING DISTRICT WITH A TOTAL MAXIMUM INTENSITY OF UP TO 150,000 SQUARE FEET OF GROSS FLOOR AREA OF DEVELOPMENT, AND A MAXIMUM OF 400 RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS, AND FURTHERMORE DIRECTING TRANSMITTAL OF THE AMENDMENT TO THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE INTERSECTION OF IMMOKA�EE ROAD AND 4TH STREET NE IN SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 48 NORTH, RANGE 27 EAST, CONSISTING OF 50.18* ACRES. [PL20190002355] Project Location 0 m C O H 3: Randall BLVD Immok,alee 90 e All Interested parl4es are invited to appear and be heard. Copies of the proposed RESOLUTION will be made available for inspection at the Collier County Clerk's Office, Fourth Floor, Collier County Government Center, 3299 East Tamiami Trail, Suite 401, Naples, FL, one week prior to the scheduled hearing. Written comments must be filed with the Zoning Division, Zoning Services Section, prior to April 1, 2021. As part of an ongoing Initiative to Promote social distancing during the COVID-19 pandemic, the public will have the opportunityto provide public comments remotely, as well as In person, during this proceeding. Individuals who would like to participate remotely, should register any time after the agenda is posted on the County wabsite wh-cri is 6 days before the meeting through the link provided on the front page of the County website at wwW,t:Qlllercountyfl aov. Individuals who register will receive an email in advance of the public hearing detailing how they can participate remotely in this meeting. For additional information about the meeting, please call Thomas Clarke at f239► 252-2526 or email to CCPCRemoteParticjp,�tion�ColherCountvF Any person who Oecides to appeal any decision Of the Collier County Planning Commission will need a record of the pfoeeedings pertaining thereto and therefore, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made• which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal Is based If you are a person with a disability whu "eeds any accommodation in order to participate In this proceeding, you are ent,tied, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Division• located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 101, Naples, FL 34112-5356, (239) 252-838Q at least two days prior to the meeting. Assisted listening devices for the hearing impaired are available In the Board of County Commissioners Office. Collier County Planning Commission Edwin Fryer, Chairman �C*ewe l r Q Packet Pg. 2081 17. D.4 NtIlItCS 4j1ctTtH NrI115 PART Of THE USA TODAY NETWORK Published Daily Naples, FL 34110 BCC ZONING DEPARTMENT 3299 TAMIAMI TRL E 700 NAPLES FL 34112 Affidavit of Publication STATE OF WISCONSIN COUNTY OF BROWN Before the undersigned they serve as the authority, personally appeared who on oath says that they serve as legal clerk of the Naples Daily News, a daily newspaper published at Naples, in Collier County, Florida; distributed in Collier and Lee counties of Florida; that the attached copy of the advertising was published in said newspaper on dates listed. Affiant further says that the said Naples Daily News is a newspaper published at Naples, in said Collier County, Florida, and that the said newspaper has heretofore been continuously published in said Collier County, Florida; distributed in Collier and Lee counties of Florida, each day and has been entered as second class mail matter at the post office in Naples, in said Collier County, Florida , for a period of one year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement and affiant further says that he has neither paid nor promised any person, or corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this advertisement for publication in the said newspaper. 3/12/2021 Subscribed and sworn to before on March 12th, 2021 Notary, State of WI, County of Brown —j ~TARA MONDLOCH IW Notary Public State of Wisconsin My commission expires: August 6, 2021 PUBLICATION COST: S945.00 AD NO: GC10605495 CUSTOMER NO: 505869 POff: PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE Packet Pg. 2082 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING 17. D.4 Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the Collier County Planning Commission sitting as the IuCal planning ayency and [lie Erivirunnren[al Advisory Council, at 9:00 A.M., April 1, 2021, in the Board of County Commissioners Meeting Room, Third Floor, Collier Government Center, 3299 East Tamiami Trail, Naples FL., to consider: A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA PROPOSING AMENDMENT TO ORDINANCE NO. 89-05, AS AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, SPECIFICALLY AMENDING THE RURAL GOLDEN GATE ESTATES SUB -ELEMENT OF THE GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN AND THE RURAL GOLDEN GATE ESTATES FUTURE LAND USE MAP AND MAP SERIES TO CREATE THE IMMOKALEE ROAD/4TH STREET N.E. MIXED USE SUBDISTRICT BY CHANGING THE DESIGNATION OF THE PROPERTY FROM THE ESTATES -MIXED USE DISTRICT, RESIDENTIAL ESTATES SUBDISTRICT TO THE ESTATES -MIXED USE DISTRICT, IMMOKALEE ROAD/4TH STREET N.E. MIXED USE SUBDISTRICT, TO ALLOW USES PERMITTED BY RIGHT AND CONDITIONAL USE IN THE GENERAL COMMERCIAL (C-4) ZONING DISTRICT WITH A TOTAL MAXIMUM INTENSITY OF UP TO 150,000 SQUARE FEET OF GROSS FLOOR AREA OF DEVELOPMENT, AND A MAXIMUM OF 400 RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS, AND FURTHERMORE DIRECTING TRANSMITTAL OF THE AMENDMENT TO THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE INTERSECTION OF IMMOKALEE ROAD AND 4TH STREET NE IN SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 48 NORTH, RANGE 27 EAST, CONSISTING OF 50.18f ACRES. [PL20190002355] Project Location 0 J m C O rn Randall BLVD Immokalee R� ON All interested parties are invited to appear and be heard. Copies of the proposed RESOLUTION will be made available for inspection at the Collier County Clerk's Office, Fourth Floor, Collier County Government Center, 3299 East Tamiami Trail, Suite 401, Naples, FL, one week prior to the scheduled hearing. Written comments must be filed with the Zoning Division, Zoning Services Section, prior to April 1, 2021. As part of an ongoing initiative to promote social distancing during the COVID-19 pandemic, the public will have the opportunity to provide public comments remotely, as well as in person, during this proceeding. Individuals who would like to participate remotely, should register any time after the agenda is posted on the County website which is 6 days before the meeting through the link provided on the front page of the County website at www.colliercountvfl.gov. Individuals who register will receive an email in advance of the public hearing detailing how they can participate remotely in this meeting. For additional information about the meeting, please call Thomas Clarke at (239) 252-2526 or email to CCrCRemoteParticrpahont�CollierCntrntyFL. 0ov• Any person who decides to appeal any decision of the Collier County Planning Commission will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto and therefore, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is based. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Division, located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 101, Naples, FL 34112-5356, (239) 252-8380, at least two days prior to the meeting. Assisted listening devices for the hearing impaired are available in the Board of County Commissioners Office. Collier County Planning Commission Edwin Fryer, Chairman N0.GC1000 &01 Packet Pg. 2083 17.D.5 AFFIDAVIT OF COMPLIANCE Petitions PL20190002355 Immokalee Road/4th Street N.E. Mixed Use Subdistrict (GMPA) and PL20190002356, Randall Curve MPUD Rezone (PUDZ) I hereby certify that pursuant to Ordinance 2004-41, of the Collier County Land Development Code, I did cause the attached newspaper advertisement to appear and I did give notice by mail to the following property owners and/or condominium and civic associations whose members may be affected by the proposed land use changes of an application request for a rezoning, PUD amendment, or conditional use, at least 15 days prior to the scheduled Neighborhood Information Meeting. For the pui poses of this requirement, the names and addresses of property owners shall be deemed those appearing on the latest tax rolls of Collier County and any other persons or entities who have made a formal request of the county to be notified. The said notice contained the laymen's description of the site property of proposed change and the date, time, and place of a Neighborhood Information Meeting. Per the attached letters, property owner's list, and copy of newspaper advertisement which are hereby made a part of this Affidavit of Compliance. / -,�) -ZA-, --� D. Wayne Arnold, AICP State of Florida County of Lee The foregoing Affidavit of compliance was acknowledged before me this November 23, 2020 by D. Wayne Arnold, AICP, who is personally known to me. (Sign toe of Not �-y public) �j W COMMISSION # G0 2816V Kimberly A. Scher f,•z EXPIRES. DeoemW 12.2022 Printed Name of Notary ,.4gF•' ten,,,, Packet Pg. 20 4 GradyMinor 17.D.5 Civil Engineers • Land SurveNsorS • PlanncrS • Landscape Architects NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING Petitions PL20190002355 Immokalee Road/4th Street N.E. Mixed Use Subdistrict (GMPA) and PL20190002356, Randall Curve MPUD Rezone (PUDZ) A Neighborhood Information Meeting hosted by D. Wayne Arnold, AICP, of Q. Grady Minor and Associates, P.A. and Richard D. Yovanovich, Esq. of Coleman, Yovanovich & Koester, P.A., representing Richard D. Yovanovich as Successor Trustee (Applicant) will be held on Wednesday, December 9, 2020, 5:30 pm at North Collier Regional Park Exhibit Hall — Room A, 15000 Livingston Road, Naples 34109. Individuals who would like to participate remotely or have questions or comments should contact Sharon Umpenhour, Senior Planning Technician with Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. by email: sumpenhour@gradyminor.com, phone: 239-947-1144, or mail: 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, FL 34134. Project information is posted online at www.gradyminor.com/planning. Richard D. Yovanovich as Successor Trustee has submitted formal applications to Collier County, seeking approval of a Growth Management Plan (GMP) Amendment and a Planned Unit Development (PUD) Rezone. The GMP amendment proposes to amend the Golden Gate Area Master Plan, Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub -Element to establish the Immokalee Road/4th Street N.E. Mixed Use Subdistrict. The new subdistrict will provide for a variety of retail, office, personal service and residential land uses to allow a maximum of 150,000 square feet of nonresidential uses and a maximum of 400 residential dwelling units. The companion PUD rezone proposes to rezone the property from E, Estates to the Randall Curve Mixed Use Planned Development (MPUD) to allow development of the property with the retail, office, personal service and a variety of residential land use types. Access to the property will be via Immokalee Road and a vehicular interconnection with the property located immediately north of the subdistrict. The subject property is comprised of 50.18± acres located on the northeast corner of Immokalee Road and 4t" Street N.E. in Section 22, Township 48 South, Range 27 East, Collier County, Florida. SUBJECT , PROPERTY Grove DR w a LU W a o— N S � a � w Project Location Map �o� c qQ .r 25th AVE NE 25th AVE NE a♦O� f O� F� Randall BLVD The Neighborhood Information Meeting is for informational purposes only, it is not a public hearing. Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. Ph. 239-947-1144 Fax. 239-947-0375 3800 Via Del Rey EB 0005151 LB 000515 Bonita Springs, FL 34134 www Packet Pg. 2085 17.D.5 Notice: This data belongs to the Collier County Property Appraiser's Office (CCPA). Therefore, the recipient agrees not to represent this data to anyone as other than CCPA provided data. The recipient may not transfer this data to others without consent from the CCPA. Petition: PL20190002355(GMPA) & PL20190002356(PUDZ) I Buffer: 1000' 1 Date: 11/3/2020 1 Site Location - NAM NAME2 NAME3 NAME, AFFLECK, JESSICA T 2916 ORANGE GROVE TRL ALBY, JAMES B 2274 GROVE DR ALLEN, MICHAEL SHANE LINDSEY KATE ALLEN 2896 ORANGE GROVE TRL ALTER, JULIANNE M 2897 INLET COVE LN W ANGELA IGLESIAS REV TRUST 3213 W WOODLAWN AVE ARGUELLO, CLAUDIO & MARIA 2885 INLET COVE LN W AVALLONE, ENRICO ADINA-VIVANNE AVALLONE 2941 4TH ST NE BARBUTO, KARIE P 391 24TH AVE NE BAY ATLAS PROPERTIES INC 41 SEVILLE DR BCF/NORTH COLLIER FIRE RESCUE 1885 VETERANS PARK DR BCHD PARTNERS I LLC % DAVID GENSON 2600 GOLDEN GATE PKWY BCHD PARTNERS I LLC % DAVID GENSON 2600 GOLDEN GATE PKWY BCHD PARTNERS I LLC % DAVID GENSON 2600 GOLDEN GATE PKWY BCHD PARTNERS I LLC 2600 GOLDEN GATE PKWY ATTN: DAVIS GENSON BLUME, STEPHEN & MILAGROS 2820 39TH AVE NE BO, BRYAN & BRITTNEY 2887 BLOSSOM CT BOLLT TR, ROBERTO % ORANGETREE ASSOCIATES PO BOX 855 BOLLT TR, ROBERTO % ORANGETREE ASSOCIATES PO BOX 855 BOLLT TR, ROBERTO % ORANGETREE ASSOCIATES PO BOX 855 BOLLT TR, ROBERTO % ORANGETREE ASSOCIATES PO BOX 855 BOLLT TR, ROBERTO % ORANGETREE ASSOCIATES PO BOX 855 BOLLT TR, ROBERTO % ORANGETREE ASSOCIATES PO BOX 855 BOLLT TR, ROBERTO LAND AGREEMENT TRUST UTD 1/27/86 AND 6/26/96 BOOHER, RANDY L & AUDREY J LOUELLA L BOOHER EST 2849 INLET COVE LN W BRAUNSTEIN, SCOTT A & BRENDA L 2927 ORANGE GROVE TRL BUONGIORNO, RENEE 2860 2ND ST NE CANDELARIA JR, ORESTES 2275 GROVE DR CAPRIROLO, ALFREDO CLAUDIA A GONZALEZ 2920 ORANGE GROVE TRL CARANDANG, JESUS C & MARIA R 2922 INLET COVE LN E CARROLL III, JEREMIAH J LAUREN ANN CARROLL 2865 INLET COVE LN W CHANCY, BRIAN S & MARY M 2878 W INLET COVE LANE CIFUENTES, STEPHANIE 2926 INLET COVE LN E CITRUS GREENS AT ORANGETREE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION INC 1130 GROVE DR CLARK, LAWRENCE E BERNADETTE M CLARK 2860 BLOSSOM CT CLEARY, MICHAEL & DEANNA 2798 INLET COVE LN W COGSWELL, RICKY L & STELLA 2790 2ND ST NE COGSWELL, RICKY L & STELLA 2790 2ND ST NE COLLIER CNTY C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 COLLIER CNTY TRANSPORTATION RIGHT-OF-WAY 2885 HORSESHOE DRIVE S CONTRERAS, CARLOS & LILIANA 7859 BUCKS RUN DR COSSIO OSPINA, MARIA ELCY JOSE RAMON BURGOS 2939 ORANGE GROVE TRL CRISSEN, KELLY M 2822 INLET COVE LN W CRUZ, CHRISTIAN DAVID 2891 ORANGE GROVE TRL CRUZ, JUANA MARLENE 2809 INLET COVE LN W CURCIO, NICKOLAS R 2805 INLET COVE LANE W CURTISS INTERNATIONAL INC 2905 INLET COVE LN W CVS 75462 FL LLC % CAREMARK CORPORATION 1 CVS DR #4738-01 D'ANDREA, JAMES FRANCIS 7960 PRESERVE CIR #616 DANIEL, EDITH 1401 CROYDEN RD DARIS, ISMENE 2923 ORANGE GROVE TRL DEL CARMEN FRIAR, MARIA RONALD ARTHUR FRIAR 2894 INLET COVE LANE W DELUCCIA, DANIEL & GAIL 2868 BLOSSOM CT DENTON, ALAN L & CATHY A 263 25TH AVE NE DIE, ISMA A & ANDRE W ISMANDRACE DIE ANDRACHLINE DIE DIRAMACCA, JAMES K & KAREN L ISOBEL M DEMARS 2857 INLET COVE LN W DONALDSON, HANNELORE MARGOT GRAHAM 2770 INLET COVE LN W DONOSO, TERESA P SALAME 2813 INLET COVE LN W DUARTE, ADIELA & HERNANDO 2965 ORANGE GROVE TRAIL DUTTON, REVA A 2282 GROVE DR EDEN, KARINA KARINA MANCUSCO 2932 ORANGE GROVE TRL ELMEUS, KATHLEEN & RENEL 2921 INLET COVE LN E ENT, GERALD B & BETTY LOU 2936 ORANGE GROVE TRL ERVIN, DAVID J & MARIA 2903 ORANGE GROVE TRL ESCALERA, KEVIN D 2899 ORANGE GROVE TRL ESTRADA, FABIAN & VANESSA 2960 ORANGE GROVE TRL ESTRADA, RAUL & LISA A 2911 ORANGE GROVE TRL EVANS III, CLARK BRITTANY LENGACHER 2904 INLET COVE LN W EVANS, DENNIS R 2944 ORANGE GROVE TRAIL EVANS, EDWARD L & PATRICIA A 441 24TH AVE NE FALVEY, JEREMY JAMES & JULISSA 2832 INLET COVE LANE W FERNANDEZ, NESTOR & DOROTHY L 2948 ORANGE GROVE TRL FIGUEIREDO, FRANCISCO TAVARES MARIA DE LOURDES MUNIZ TAVARES 2883 BLOSSOM CT FIGUEROA, ANAMARIA DAVID FIGUEROA JR 2814 INLET COVE LN W FORBES, ROGEN & SHISHANA V 2873 INLET COVE LN W FRAZIER, ALAN W & SHARON S 2910 2ND ST NE GAGLIARDO, ADRIENNE 2875 BLOSSOM CT GAGLIARDO, ADRIENNE 2875 BLOSSOM CT GANDINI, ROSE AN IN T 2886 INLET COVE LN W GARCELL, LUIS 2856 BLOSSOM CT GARCIA, FERNANDO & SUSANA R 2915 ORANGE GROVE TRL GATT, JEFFREY A & MONICA L 2841 4TH ST NE GAUDIOSI, ARMAND & TERESA 2872 BLOSSOM CT 37690040003 & 37690040100 - NAME5_ NAME6 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7496 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7513 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7569 TAMPA, FL 33607--- 6627 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 7569 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1338 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 BRICK, NJ 08723 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1355 NAPLES, FL 34105 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34105 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34105 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34105 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7528 BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34133 --- 0 BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34133 --- 0 BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34133 --- 0 BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34133 --- 0 BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34133 --- 0 BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34133 --- 0 % ORANGETREE ASSOCIATES PO BOX 855 BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34133 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 7569 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7450 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1832 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7497 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7507 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1425 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7528 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7543 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1328 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1328 NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34104 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 3904 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7450 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7559 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 7569 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 WOONSOCKET, RI 02895--- 6146 NAPLES, FL 34119 --- 0 BRIDGEWATER, NJ 08807--- 1310 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7450 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1360 2859 BLOSSOM COURT NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7569 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 7496 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7494 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7494 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7509 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7450 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7494 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7559 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 7569 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 4310 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7528 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7528 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7528 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7450 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1336 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 2A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 1-A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 2A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 7-A GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 23 TR 72 VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 7-A GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 22 N GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 23 GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 23 W GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 23 W1/2 GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 22 N GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 22 TR GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 22 TR GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 22 TR VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 7-A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 7-A ORANGE TREE UNIT TWO ORANGE TREE UNIT THREE VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 1-A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 1-A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 3A 22,23,24,25,&26 48 27 ALL, VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 7-A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 7-A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 1-A GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 22 S VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 1-A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 1-A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 2A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 7-A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 7-A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 2A LAKE LUCERNE TRACT A (DE) LESS VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 7-A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 5-A GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 22 S GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 22 N GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 22 GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 22 VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 7-A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 1-A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 7-A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 2A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 5-A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 5-A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 7-A NEIGHBORHOOD SHOPPES GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 22 N GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 22 N 1/2 VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 1-A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 7-A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 7-A GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 22 TR 91 VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 7-A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 7-A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 5-A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 5-A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 1-A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 1-A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 1-A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 2A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 1-A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 2A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 2A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 1-A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 2A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 7-A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 1-A GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 23 E VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 7-A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 1-A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 7-A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 5-A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 7-A GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 22 S VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 7-A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 7-A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 7-A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 7-A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 2A GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 22 N VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 7-A POList 1000 PL20190002355-PL20190002356.xis BILK D LOT 9 BILK A LOT 8 BILK D LOT 24 LOT 3 LOT 6 150FT OF TR 104 E 18OFT TR 70 18OFT OF TR 73 OF TR 54 OR 1206 PG 236 LESS 180FT OF TR 116 OR 294 PG 62 118 OR 1106 PG 403, LESS THAT 119, LESS THE EASTERLY 49 FT 120 LESS THAT PORTION FOR R/W LOT 50 LOT 37 CITRUS GREENS SECTION PH 4-A CITRUS GREENS SECTION PH, 1-A TRACT A BILK A LOT 1 TRACT C LESS GOLDEN GATE ESTS UNITS 22 TRACT D LOT 15 BILK E LOT 10 150FT OF TR 84 BILK C LOT 3 BILK D LOT 8 BILK D LOT 21 LOT 11 LOT 53 BILK D LOT 20 THAT PART FOR R/W AS DESC IN LOT 47 LOT 33 150FT OF TR 86 180FT OF TR 86 TRACT A, LESS THAT PORTION OF THAT PORTION OF TRACT "A" AS LOT 26 BILK E LOT 7 LOT 25 BILK F LOT 5 LOT 28 LOT 27 LOT 1 AT ORANGE TREE TRACT 3 180FT OF TR 84 OR 1494 PG 823 OF TR 85 BILK E LOT 11 LOT 56 LOT 45 OR 1255 PG 2074 LOT 32 LOT 13 LOT 38 LOT 29 BILK E LOT 1 BILK A LOT 6 BILK D LOT 5 BILK D LOT 10 BILK D LOT 4 BILK F LOT 2 BILK F LOT 3 BILK A LOT 5 BILK E LOT 14 LOT 58 BILK D LOT 2 150FT OF TR 73 OR 1481 PG 1257 LOT 27 BILK D LOT 1 LOT 36 LOT 30 LOT 9 18OFT OF TR 83 LOT 29 LOT 34 LOT 55 LOT 48 BKL E LOT 13 150FT OF 102 OR 1689 PG 1036 LOT 44 LEGAL4 THAT PORTION FOR R/W DESC IN OR 3111 PG 0500 PORTION FOR R/W FOR R/W AS DESC IN OR 3111 PG 0500 AS DESC IN OR 3111 PG 485. LOT 1 THAT PT OF PARCEL 2 DESC AS THE W 25FT (R/W PER PLAT) 24 & 25, LESS ORANGETREE U 1 THRU 4, LESS CITRUS GREENS SEC OR 3111 PG 485 TRACT "A" AS DESC IN OR 3080 PG 723, AS AMENDED IN OR 4079 DESC IN OR 3080 PG 723, AS CORRECTED IN OR 4079 PG 1358 FOLIO ADDRESSTYPE 78698004408 U 78698000185 U 78698004709 U 78698109646 U 37745200002 U 78698109701 U 37697440004 U .-. 37745080002 U V 37745280006 U i 37744080003 U w+ N 37698360002 U 37698440003 U 37698480005 U 3 37698520004 U N 78698110583 U 78698110321 U 64697500108 U W 64700628553 U Z 78698000020 U y 78698000046 U 78698100069 U +�+ 00210440007 U 78698109581 U 78698109882 U 78698000826 U d d 37696280003 U a 78698000444 U Y 78698000622 U O E 78698004644 U 78698109808 U E 78698110648 U Q 78698004628 U a 53360000108 U 2 78698110525 U 0 78698106704 U to 37696400003 U to 37696360004 U M N 37690040003 U O 37690040100 U O O 78698110101 U O 78698000761 U O 78698110088 U N 78698005025 U J 78698106607 U d 78698106584 U LO 78698109604 U �p 63810090069 U O 37696240001 U T 37696340008 U 78698000842 U O 78698110703 U N O 78698110486 U N 37696720000 U 78698110224 U t) 78698109840 U y 78698106801 U 78698106623 U N 78698000648 U t) O 78698000143 U 0 78698000567 U 78698004424 U 78698000541 U Z 78698004961 U r 78698004987 U = 78698000127 U 78698004929 U 78698110745 U 78698000509 U +, 37745240004 U Q 78698110127 U 78698000486 U 78698110305 U 78698106649 U 78698109769 U 37696160000 U 78698110169 U 78698110266 U 78698110680 U 78698110541 U 78698004903 U 37697360003 U 78698110460 U Packet Pg. 20 6 17.D.5 GIBBY, MEL GM ADVISORS LLC GOLDMAN, GREENBAUM RISA GOMEZ, JUAN L & SYBLE D GOMEZ, M DE JESUS CIFUENTES GONZALES, RENE & YOLANDA GONZALEZ, IDALMYS GONZALEZ, JUAN HAYDEN, JAMES M & MARYJANE HEBBLE, DAVID T HEMMIT, EDWARD RAY& NATALIE HENRY S PICKANDS JR REV TRUST HERRERA, LAZARD A & ELIZABETH HINKEL, ANGELA M HONSBERGER, DENNIS & SHILREY HUGHES, EDWARD & KELLY JACQUELINE B FORBES REV TRUST JANKE, ANGELA J JONES, JEFFERY & DULCE A JONES, PAULA & STEPHEN JOUANET, JAMES JP MORGAN CHASE BK N A TR KILCOYNE, DENNIS & DIANE KING, DAVID ALAN KINNEY, STEVEN J KLINE, HAMERA KLINGENSMITH, JOHN J KROMMENHOEK,SCOTT KUOMAN, ALFONSO KUOMAN, RICHARD W & ANA MARIA KUOMAN, THAIS LABUZIENSKI, CHRISTINE A LECOMPTE, JENIFER & GERALD LEONE, SALVATORE & SANTA LEVENTHAL, JACOB & CAROLINA LEVY, NOAM LIKRAMA, GENTIAN & GERTA LITTLE, COLLIN J LOURO, MICHAEL & KORI L LSF9 MASTER PART TRUST LUKASZEW ICZ, ADAM LUND, MERRILL A & LINDA D LUSSIER, RONALD A & GRETCHEN S LYDON, JOHN P & KRISTEN MALEBRAN, CARLOS & TAYMI MARRETTA, KEVIN A & DEEANN R MARTINEZ, ALEXANDRA & SEGUNDO MARTINEZ, JOSEPH MARZANO,LAURA MCINERNEY, TAMMY CLAREY MEDINA, ERNESTO & MARIA MENDOLA, GERALD & JOANNE E MEUNIER, ANDREW C MK REALTY ORANGETREE LLC MOORE EST, FREDERICK B MOORER, CONRAD L & DELENE R MOREAU, MADITA MOYE, BRIAN C & MICHELLE L MUNOZ, EMILIO A MYB PROPERTIES LLC MYLI, STEVEN & DEANA NAFDOF 22 LLC NAGY, STEPHEN L NELSON, ARTHUR W & KAREN S NGUYEN, TINA H & JIMMY 0 GRADY, JAMES T & PATRICIA A ORTEGAJR,ERNESTO OSCEOLA, KARIE JO OSPINA, HERNAN D OSPINA, JORGE IVAN PAC OF COLLIER INC PAYAN,AARON PELLETIER, JOHN M & JENNIFER L PEREZ III, RAUL & ELISABETH PEREZ, ISIDORA PEREZ, JOSE & JULIE JEANELL PEREZ, MARIA C & CARLOS A PEREZ, MARIA ELENA PRATT, DONALD & KIMBERLY PROENZA TR, WALFRIDO S PROENZA, WALFRIDO PROGRESS RES BORROWER 2 LLC PUBLIX SUPER MARKETS INC RAHMAN, MOHAMMED M & FAHMIDA RAHMAN, MOHAMMED M & FAHMIDA RAKES, DARRIN & MARIA RAMOS JR, ABEL & TAMMY E RANDALL BOULEVARD LAND TRUST 2884 BLOSSOM CT 7675 SANTA MARGHERITA WAY ELISE GREENBAUM LEVINSON 320 25TH AVE NE ADRIANA LEDESMA 2680 2ND ST NE 2817 INLET COVE LN W VIOLETA ALVAREZ 2821 4TH ST NE 3766 E MONON RD 2966 ORANGE GROVE TRL 6925 CARLISLE CT 9661 SW 102ND AVENUE RD 2887 ORANGE GROVE TRL 2782 INLET COVE LN W 2818 INLET COVE LN W 2940 ORANGE GROVE TRL 2879 ORANGE GROVE TRL 2801 INLET COVE LN W 22 HIAWATHA DR 6245 DESOTO BLVD RICHARD D BREWER REST TRUST 675 104TH AVE N GLORIA LILLYANA KING 149 PINEHURST CIR 2892 BLOSSOM CT CANDACE KLINGENSMITH 2875 CYPRESS TRACE CIR #203 ROSA E ANGULO DE KUOMAN 2953 ORANGE GROVE TRL 2893 INLET COVE LN W KRISTEN L LABUZIENSKI 2901 INLET COVE LN W 15936 82ND ST 2861 INLET COVE LANE W MIRI ARMOZA 2762 INLET COVE LN 2841 INLET COVE LN W 2891 BLOSSOM CT %HUDSON HOMES MGMT LLC BEATA SUICK 2867 BLOSSOM CT 3040 ORANGE GROVE TRL 2794 INLET COVE LN W 2833 INLET COVE LN W 2283 GROVE DR 2781 INLET COVE LN W SHIRLEY K MENDEZ URIBE 2888 ORANGE GROVE TRL 3717 KAWKAWLIN RIVER DR 2531 4TH ST NE 2931 ORANGE GROVE TRL 3041 ORANGE GROVE TRL 6685 COLLIER BLVD 2625 4TH ST N E 2930 INLET COVE LN E LUCNER OLCIMA 2949 ORANGE GROVE TRL 2279 GROVE DR 8356 LAUREL LAKES BLVD 2660 2ND ST NE 2316 PINE RIDGE RD #453 2943 ORANGE GROVE TRL 2961 ORANGE GROVE TRL 2874 INLET COVE LN W 3030 ORANGE GROVE TRL PROVIDENCE DE AZA 2580 2ND ST NE LILIANA J LEDESMA 2898 INLET COVE LN W 5141 SEAHORSE AVE JAZMIN PAYAN ZULETA 2961 4TH ST NE 2864 BLOSSOM CT 3011 ORANGE GROVE TRL 2883 ORANGE GROVE TRAIL 3021 ORANGE GROVE TRL 2918 INLET COVE LN E 2825 INLET COVE LN W WALFRIDO S PROENZA TRUST 2655 4TH ST N E PO BOX 4090 PO BOX 32018 13056 VALEWOOD DR 13056 VALEWOOD DR 2820 2ND ST NE 2881 INLET COVE LN W %ANDREW DICKMAN LAW FIRM SUSAN GREENBAUM ROQUITE 1925 LARGO RD 2560 2ND ST NE 2792 BERGAMOT LN UTD 6/28/93 2871 4TH ST NE 2776 INLET COVE LN W 2848 INLET COVE LN W 2957 ORANGE GROVE TRL 2766 INLET COVE LN W 2560 8TH AVE SE 3701 REGENT BLVD #200 2980 ORANGE GROVE TRL 2935 ORANGE GROVE TRL 2821 INLET COVE LN W 3051 ORANGE GROVE TRL 2845 INLET COVE LN W 2876BLOSSOM COURT UTFD 08/07/03 809 WALKERBILT RD STE 7 515 LOGAN BLVD S NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7528 NAPLES, FL 34109 --- 0 JACKSONVILLE, FL 32207 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1341 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7569 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7534 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 MONTICELLO, IN 47960--- 7135 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34109 --- 0 MIAMI, FL 33176--- 2734 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7494 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 GREENVILLE, SC 29615 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1336 NAPLES, FL 34108 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34113--- 8330 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 7528 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7559 NAPLES, FL 34119 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7450 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7450 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34114--- 7917 HOWARD BEACH, NY 11414--- 2927 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34117 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 7569 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 7528 IRVING, TX 75063 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7449 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 7528 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1448 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7543 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 7569 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7497 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7548 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7513 BAY CITY, M 148706 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7450 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1494 NAPLES, FL 34114 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1319 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7507 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7450 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34119 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1326 NAPLES, FL 34109 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7450 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7450 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7538 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1448 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 4318 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7538 NAPLES, FL 34103--- 2466 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1338 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1494 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7507 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7569 NAPLES, FL 34119--- 2805 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1319 SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85261 --- 0 LAKELAND, FL 33802 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34119--- 8577 NAPLES, FL 34119--- 8577 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1832 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34110 --- 0 VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 7-A GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 23 TR 53 GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 22 TR 97 GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 22 N 300 GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 22 S GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 22 N VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 7-A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 5-A GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 22 S VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 2A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 1-A GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 22 S GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 22 S 165 VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 2A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 5-A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 7-A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 1-A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 2A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 5-A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 1-A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 2A GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 22 TR GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 22 S 112 VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 5-A ORANGE TREE UNIT TWO VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 7-A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 7-A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 5-A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 1-A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 1-A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 7-A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 5-A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 7-A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 5-A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 7-A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 2A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 5-A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 7-A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 7-A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 7-A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 1-A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 7-A ORANGE TREE UNIT TWO VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 5-A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 7-A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 1-A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 5-A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 1-A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 2A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 7-A GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 22 N VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 1-A LAKE LUCERNE LOT 18 NEIGHBORHOOD SHOPPES GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 22 S VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 2A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 7-A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 1-A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 1-A GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 22 S GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 22 S GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 22 N1/2 VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 1-A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 1-A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 7-A ORANGE TREE UNIT TWO LAKE LUCERNE LOT 17 GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 22 N VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 7-A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 7-A GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 23 E1/2 VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 7-A GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 22 S VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 7-A LAKE LUCERNE LOT 21 VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 2A LAKE LUCERNE LOT 20 VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 2A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 7-A GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 22 TR GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 22 N LAKE LUCERNE LOT 19 NEIGHBORHOOD SHOPPES GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 22 TR 94, GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 22 TR 95 GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 22 S 1/2 VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 7-A GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 23 E POList 1000 PL20190002355-PL20190002356.xis LOT 41 LESS THAT PORTION FOR R/W DESC IN OR 3100 PG 2577 FT OF TR 94 OR 1750 PG 2181 15OFT OF TR 90 OR 1630 PG 1722 18OFT OF TR 88 OR 830 PG 353 LOT 23 LOT 21 18OFT OF TR 102 AND THE N 180 BLK F LOT 1 BLK A LOT 4 15OFT OF TR 116 OR 1391 PG FT OF TR 121 LESS THAT PORTION BLK F LOT 6 LOT 36 LOT 24 BLK D LOT 3 BLK F LOT 8 LOT 26 BLK D LOT 6 BLK D LOT 25 103 AND THE S 180FT TR 104 OF TR 87 LOT 37 CITRUS GREENS SECTION PH 4-A LOT 39 LOT 30 LOT 19 BLK E LOT 3 BLK E LOT 4 LOT 4 LOT 39 LOT 2 LOT 25 LOT 12 BLK F LOT 10 LOT 40 LOT 17 LOT 38 LOT 18 BLK A LOT 2 LOT 33 CITRUS GREENS SECTION PH 4-A LOT 34 LOT 19 BLK C LOT 1, LESS THAT PORTION LOT 18 BLK E LOT 8 BLK D LOT 26 LOT 49 15OFT OF TR 96 BLK E LOT 9 AT ORANGETREE TRACT 1 180FT OF TR 98 OR 1171 PG 814 BLK D LOT 19 LOT 22 BLK E LOT 5 BLK C LOT 2, AND THAT PORTION 150FT OF TR 114 OR 1832 PG 914 150FT OF TR 88 OF TR 115 BLK E LOT 6 BLK E LOT 2 LOT 52 CITRUS GREENS SECTION PH 4-A 180FT OF TR 90 LOT 16 LOT 57 OF TR 54 LESS THAT PORTION FOR LOT 43 150FT OF TR 105 OR 1954 PG 999 LOT 46 BLK F LOT 7 BLK D LOT 22 LOT 21 100 150FT OF TR 98 AT ORANGETREE TRACT 2 REPLAT LESS N 300 FT AND LESS THAT LESS THAT PORTION FOR R/W AS OF TR 85 LOT 7 150FT OF TR 90 FT OF TR 101 1945 FOR R/W AS DESC IN OR 3111 PG 485. LOT 2 LOT 5 DESC IN 2777 PG 2543 OF LOT 1 DESC IN OR 2777 LOT 4 R/W AS DESC IN OR 3111 PG 0500 TRACT 2 PORTION FOR R/W DESC IN OR DESC IN OR 3111 PG 0500 PG 2543 3111 PG 0500 78698110402 U 37744000009 U 37697000004 U 37696840003 U 37696680001 U 37696520006 U 78698110046 U 78698106461 U 37697320001 U 78698004945 U 78698000101 U 37698320000 U 37698580002 U 78698005041 U V 78698106762 U L 78698110062 U N 78698000525 U 78698005083 U 3 78698106568 U N 78698000583 U 78698004725 U 37697400002 U W 37696460001 U Z 78698106788 U r+ 64697500205 U (n 78698110363 U t 78698110185 U 78698106429 U 78698000680 U 78698000703 U d 78698109662 U G) 78698106827 U <C 78698109620 U Y O 78698106542 U E 78698109824 U 78698005122 U 78698106843 U Q 78698109921 U 78698110347 U 2 78698109947 U 0 78698000062 U Lo 78698110240 U Lo M 64697500506 U 04 78698106720 U G O 78698109963 U O 78698000402 U m 78698106403 U p 78698000787 U 04 J 78698004741 U a 78698110567 U 37696960006 U Lo 78698000800 U LC 53360000467 U L1'> 63810090027 U 37697040006 U 78698004602 U C N 78698110020 U O 78698000729 U N 78698000428 U 37698120006 U V 37696480007 U O 0 37698240009 U 78698000745 U to V 78698000664 U O 78698110622 U 0 64697500409 U ^� 53360000441 U Z 37696640009 U 78698109905 U = 78698110729 U d 37744040001 U 78698110444 U 37697520005 U 78698110509 U ram+ 53360000522 U Q 78698005067 U 53360000506 U 78698004660 U 78698110004 U 37697200008 U 37697080008 U 53360000483 U 63810090124 U 37696860009 U 37696880005 U 37696320002 U 78698109727 U 377468000 Packet Pg. 2 7 17.D.5 RANDALL BOULEVARD LAND TRUST RANDALL BOULEVARD LAND TRUST RANDALL BOULEVARD LAND TRUST RANDALL BOULEVARD LAND TRUST RANDALL BOULEVARD TRUST RESTREPO, LUIS RESTREPO, MARIA DEL CARMEN E RIMMER, MARCUS B & SONYIA RISING, BLAKE RIVERA, JAMES & MARIA ROBERTO BOLLT TR ROBERTO BOLLT TR ROBERTO BOLLT TR RODRIGUEZ, ERIC DAVID ROJAS, OCTAVIO L & CARIDAD M ROTONDO, RAFFAELE & KRISTY M SEPANSKI, THOMAS GERARD SHELDON, EVELYN S SIROK, MARK JASEN & AAMIEE N SLETTEN, PAUL A & NICOLE J SMITH, ELTON G & DOLORES J SMITH, MICHAEL & SHARRON SOLIS, FRANKLIN JESUS CHAVEZ STARK, NATALIE A STRONG, BRANDON L & SARAH SWANSON, CARTER & LANA TALARICO, JEFFREY SCOTT THEMEL, JOHN W TORRES, CARLOS G TORRES, JORGE TRAN,HENRY TRUBIANO, ROBERT & ANNA C UCCI, MICHAEL G UNSWORTH, PAUL J & HEATHER J URIKA OIL INC URIKA OIL INC VALDEZ, DAVID A VALENCIA LAKES AT ORANGETREE VALENCIA LAKES AT ORANGETREE VALENCIA LAKES AT ORANGETREE VALENCIA LAKES AT ORANGETREE VALENCIA LAKES AT ORANGETREE VALLE, MARTHA L VCC PROPERTIES LLC VEGA, MARVIN & JOANNE VERBEL,JENNIFER WALLACE, JULIE WALTERS SCOTT A & DEBRA L WARREN, BETTY WHEELER, JOHN H & THELMA A WILLIAMS, MILDRED & PETER C WU, MAN WEI KALB, JUAN & ANTJE SERRA, GUERINO & ANGELA THOMAS, DAVID W THOMAS, DAVID W XU INVESTMENTS LP XU, ZHONG %ANDREW DICKMAN LAW FIRM %ANDREW DICKMAN LAW FIRM 809 WALKERBILT RD STE 7 809 WALKERBILT RD STE 7 %ANDREW DICKMAN LAW FIRM 2889 INLET COVE LN W JUAN CARLOS RESTREPO 2879 BLOSSOM CT 2970 ORANGE GROVE TRL 2867 ORANGE GROVE TRL PO BOX 855 PO BOX 855 PO BOX 855 MARIA BELEN ECHEVERRIA MELLO 363 25TH AVE NE 2829 INLET COVE LN W THOMAS GERARD SEPANSKI II JANET G MENDELSOHN 2773 INLET COVE LN W 3020 ORANGE GROVE TRAIL 2278 GROVE DR 2793 INLET COVE LN W MARIELLA ELIANA FLORES 204 SOUTH PAFFRATH 2900 ORANGE GROVE TRL 2853 INLET COVE LN W LYNN MARIE TALARICO 2910 4TH ST NE ANA KOCH CHRISTINE CASIERI TORRES VAN LAM DUSTIN EARL MILLERD MCDONALD 2924 ORANGE GROVE TRAIL 2888 BLOSSOM CT 384 RANDALL BLVD 384 RANDALL BLVD UNIT 3 VICTORIA HAYDEE VALDEZ HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION INC HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION INC HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION INC HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION INC HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION INC MARTHA R HERRERA 4085 TAMIAMI TRAIL NORTH 2925 INLET COVE LN E 2882 INLET COVE LN W 2919 ORANGE GROVE TRL 2933 INLET COVE LN E 2929 INLET COVE LN E 2761 4TH ST NE 2869 INLET COVE LN W 2877 INLET COVE LN W APARTADO AEREO 500 4575 RAY ROAD 5406 BLOOMINGTON RD 9 CAIRO CT 118 CHANCERY CRESENT TING LAN ZHU 809 WALKERBILT RD STE 7 809 WALKERBILT RD STE 7 809 WALKERBILT RD STE 7 2870 INLET COVE LANE W 2875 ORANGE GROVE TRAIL 4269 ENTERPRISE AVE 24D EDINBURGH DR 2796 BERGAMOT LN 2810 INLET COVE LN W 2777 INLET COVE LN W 2806 INLET COVE LN W 2800 BERGAMOT LANE 2789 INLET COVE LN W 2855 BLOSSSOM CT % VISION ASSOC MTG % VISION ASSOC MTG % VISION ASSOC MTG % VISION ASSOC MTG % VISION ASSOC MTG RODOLFO HERRERA SUITE B105 118 CHANCERY CRESCENT 11691 GATEWAY BLVD # 203 11691 GATEWAY BLVD # 203 11691 GATEWAY BLVD # 203 11691 GATEWAY BLVD # 203 11691 GATEWAY BLVD # 203 2730 2ND ST NE NAPLES, FL 34110 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34110 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34110 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34110 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34110 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7449 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7514 BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34133 --- 0 BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34133 --- 0 BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34133 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1342 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34104 --- 0 MONROE TOWNSHIP, NJ 08831 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7548 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7496 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7550 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 SPRINGFIELD, MN 56087 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7510 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7569 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7559 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7548 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7559 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7548 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7528 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 3325 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 3325 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 FT MYERS, FL 33913 --- 0 FT MYERS, FL 33913 --- 0 FT MYERS, FL 33913 --- 0 FT MYERS, FL 33913 --- 0 FT MYERS, FL 33913 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1328 NAPLES, FL 34103 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7507 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7507 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1850 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7569 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 7569 MEDELLIN COLOMBIA MAIDSDONE NOR 1KO CANADA STOUFFVILLE L4A7X3 CANADA STOUFFVILLE L4A1N9 CANADA OTTAWA K4A4N3 CANADA ORLEANS K4A4N3 CANADA GGEACA PO Box 990596 Naples, FL 34116 GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 23 GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 23 GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 23 E GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 23 W GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 23 W VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 7-A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 7-A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 7-A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 1-A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 2A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 2A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 2A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 2A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 2A GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 22 S VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 7-A GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 22 S GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 22 N VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 5-A ORANGE TREE UNIT TWO VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 1-A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 5-A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 5-A GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 22 TR 93 VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 2A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 7-A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 5-A GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 22 S1/2 VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 5-A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 5-A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 5-A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 5-A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 1-A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 7-A GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 23 TR 71 GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 23 THAT VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 7-A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 5-A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 5-A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 7-A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 7-A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 7-A GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 22 N 1/2 VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 7-A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 2A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 7-A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 1-A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 2A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 2A GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 22 S VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 7-A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 7-A GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 22 TR VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 2A GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 22 N GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 22 S VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 7-A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 5-A E1/2 OF TR 107 W 1/2 OF TR 107 180FT OF TR 89 150FT OF TR 89 180FT OF TR 90 LOT 5 LOT 51 LOT 35 BLK A LOT 3 BLK F LOT 11 TRACT A TRACT D TRACT E BLK F LOT 9 180FT OF TR 96 LOT 20 180FT OF TR 89 OR 1497 PG 47 150FT OF TR 89 LOT 16 CITRUS GREENS SECTION PH 4-A BLK A LOT 7 LOT 24 LOT 22 LESS THAT PORTION FOR R/W DESC BLK D LOT 23 LOT 14 LOT 31 OF TR 115 OR 1673 PG 1128 LOT 17 LOT 32 LOT 23 LOT 20 BLK D LOT 7 LOT 40 LESS THAT PORTION DESC IN OR PORTION OF TR 71 AS DESC IN OR LOT 31 TRACT A TRACT B TRACT A TRACT B TRACT C OF TR 87 LOT 42 BLK D LOT 11 LOT 54 BLK E LOT 12 BLK D LOT 13 BLK D LOT 12 150FT OF TR 101 OR 1703 PG LOT 10 LOT 8 117 OR 601 PG 1040 BLK F LOT 4 180FT OF TR 99 150FT OF TR 99 OR 713 PG 787 LOT 28 LOT 35 LOT 3 IN OR 3092 PG 2940 1659 PG 1510-12, OR 1616 PG 1854 PG 455-458 1964 312 37748480007 U 37748480104 U 37746720002 U 37746760004 U 37746840005 U 78698109688 U 78698110606 U 78698110282 U 78698000088 U 78698005148 U 78698004026 U 78698004084 U 78698004107 U 78698005106 U 37696920004 U 78698109989 U 37696560008 U 37696600007 U 78698106364 U 64697500302 U 78698000169 U 78698106526 U 78698106487 U 37696800001 U 78698004686 U 78698109866 U 78698106665 U 37698280001 U 78698106380 U 78698106681 U 78698106500 U 78698106445 U 78698000606 U 78698110389 U 37745120001 U 37745180009 U 78698110208 U 78698106021 U 78698106047 U 78698109523 U 78698109549 U 78698109565 U 37696440005 U 78698110428 U 78698004440 U 78698110664 U 78698000868 U 78698004482 U 78698004466 U 37697240000 U 78698109785 U 78698109743 U 37698400001 F 78698005009 F 37697160009 F 37697120007 F 78698110143 F 78698106746 F POList 1000 PL20190002355-PL20190002356.xis Packet Pg. 2088 NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION ME Petitions PL20190002355 Immokalee Road/4th St 17.D.5 Mixed Use Subdistrict (GMPA) and PL20190002356, Randall Curve MPUD Rezone (PUDZ) ANeighborhood Information Meeting hosted by D. WayneArnold,� of Q. Grady Minor and Associates, P.A. and Richard D. Yovano Esq. of Coleman, Yovanovich & Koester, P.A., representing Ric D. Yovanovich as Successor Trustee (Applicant) will be hel( Wednesday, December 9, 2020, 5:30 pm at North Collier Regi Park Exhibit Hall - Room A, 15000 Livingston Road, Na 34109. Individuals who would like to participate remotely or questions or comments should contact Sharon Umpenhour, S, Planning Technician with Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. by e sumpenhour@gradyminor.com, phone: 239-947-1144, or mail: Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, FL 34134. Project information is pc online at www.gradyminor.com/planning. Richard D. Yovanovich as Successor Trustee has subrr formal applications to Collier County, seeking approval Growth Management Plan (GMP) Amendment and a Planned Development (PUD) Rezone. The GMP amendment proposE amend the Golden Gate Area Master Plan, Rural Golden Gate Es - Sub -Element to establish the Immokalee Road/4th Street N.E. N Use Subdistrict. The new subdistrict will provide for a variety of r office, personal service and residential land uses to allow a maxis of 150,000 square feet of nonresidential uses and a maximum o. residential dwelling units. The companion PUD rezone propos( rezone the property from E, Estates to the Randall Curve Mixed Planned Development (MPUD) to allow development of the prol with the retail, office, personal service and a variety of residential use types. Access to the property will be via Immokalee Road vehicular interconnection with the property located immediately r of the subdistrict. The subject property is comprised of 50.18± acres located or northeast corner of Immokalee Road and 4th Street N.E. in Se 22, Township 48 South, Range 27 East, Collier County, Florida. �d Nn v� s �e w �r Z I: �0 td m� Ya E it Eo as ad t� I, LLo n NO 0 o p 0 �e oy N ad L.a h Ne Non The Neighborhood Information Meeting is for info Packet Pg. 2089 it is not a public hearing. NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING 17.D.5 Petitions PL20190002353 Estates Shopping Center Subdistrict (GMPA) and PL20190002354, Estates Shopping Center CPUD Amendment (PUDA) December 9, 2020 PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY ***P�e:ise he RoVv Sed*** The information on this sheet is to contact you regarding this project and future public meetings. Under Florida law, e-mail addresses, phone numbers and certain home addresses are public records once received by a government r agency. If you do not want your e-mail address, phone number or home address released if the county receives a V �L public records request, you can refrain from including such information on this sheet. You have the option of checking with the county staff on your own to obtain updates on the project as well as checking the county Web site for additional information. NAME: EMAIL:, ADDRESS:�4Q z a:::-- PHONE: NAME:- . 11. _ 1 I 1/ „ EMAIL: , A I _ _ I - t t SLAtl I 1 1 -1) P__I . I -1 V ••w1 I J1 i 1 v -L V� ADDRESS: '-�)gqc) S-r &'E PHONE: NAME: AVS I �LN EMAIL: + O ADDRESS-1 r \ �� PHONE: NAME: EMAIL: { ,_ ADDRESS: PHONE: NAME: EMAIL:�Ss� ADDRESS: I jf �3i-6 S4- NG4i PHONE: 9--A gSa zjl6df NAME: 1) AV I EMAIL: C Gr►_ ADDRESS: -3 [ �Jff N PHONE: NAME: 0 IF/I �4 ��E C, E N S EMAIL: ( ,�f Sfi€_ r/��5 ref foram' ADDRESS: � G PHONE: D NAME: EMAIL: ADDRESS: PHONE: NIM Sign -in Sheet 12-09-2020 0 N O N 6 J m 0 to V O a 2 r a Packet Pg. 2090 NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING 17.D.5 Petitions PL20190002355 Immokalee Road/4th Street N.E. Mixed Use Subdistrict (GMPA) and PL20190002356, Randall Curve MPUD Rezone (PUDZ) December 9, 2020 PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY ***1>Le51Se be advGSO*** The information on this sheet is to contact you regarding this project and future public meetings. Under Florida law, e-mail addresses, phone numbers and certain home addresses are public records once received by a government agency. If you do not want your e-mail address, phone number or home address released if the county receives a public records request, you can refrain from including such information on this sheet. You have the option of checking with the county staff on your own to obtain updates on the project as well as checking the county Web site for additional information. NAME: EMAIL: ADDRESS: PHONE: VV.,�JGI NAME: � � EMAIL: ADDRESS: PHONE: �,17 NAME: )6, W , r � EMAIL: ADDRESS: PHONE:2N-2_ 90 rt & q s �p NAME: 2)A V (D jt` A L_'B4�2 __t EMAIU1: 1/9 7 0 ID ADDRESS: '51B/PHONE: -2'3Cf S-6 NAME: ��� EMAIL: ADDRESS: 2 0 D A), ,? PHONE: Z�Z 2�j 0 a - NAND NAME: ZM:42 �6us EMAIL:/ , o 0/11 W, Cr✓t ADDRESS: /1 fAlf / PHONE: NAME: l cle- eA P -51� EMAIL: C) M _f re_ A,,3Qn covx ADDRESS: 0 ( PHONE: rkaio - NAME: � \ r,... . � � EMAIL: ADDRESS: } }��`� c PHONE: NIM Sign -in Sheet 12-09-2020 N V O a 11 a Packet Pg. 2091 Randall Curve MPUD and Estates Shopping Center December 9, 2020 NIM - Zoom Participants 17.D.5 First Name Last Name Email Registration Time Approval Status Jill Rosenfeld jillfrosenfeld@gmail.com 12/9/202018:25 approved David Dlugolenski dd@sagestonepartners.com 12/9/2020 17:31 approved Adam Brown ab@sagestonepartners.com 12/9/2020 17:31 approved Quincy Jones tquincyjones@gmail.com 12/9/2020 17:31 approved Robert Anderson ander100@comcast.net 12/9/202017:28 approved Maggie Kemp mkemp@comcast.net 12/9/2020 17:06 approved Michele Vaughan michele@davisgroupga.com 12/9/2020 17:01 approved Jillian Shaw jillian@davisgroupga.com 12/9/2020 16:59 approved Collin Johnson Collin@coastal-it.com 12/9/2020 16:42 approved Ty Thrasher tythrasher@outlook.com 12/9/2020 16:01 approved Corby Schmidt Corby.Schmidt@colliercountyfl.gov 12/9/2020 14:03 approved Billy Chambers billy@davisgroupga.com 12/9/202012:06 approved Dawna Livingstone dpipersburg@rembrandtaccounting.com 12/9/202010:02 approved Tim Ross rossdesinc@aol.com 12/8/2020 23:22 approved Susan Ruesink suerruesink@yahoo.com 12/8/2020 18:04 approved Mike Dalbey Mtpd7904@gmail.com 12/8/2020 16:29 approved Peter Brake pbrake@cmcd.org 12/8/2020 16:19 approved Diane Lynch dtlynch@comcast.net 12/8/2020 16:08 approved Scott Baxter madpoodle@aol.com 12/7/2020 20:57 approved Mary Bachelor mabachelor@comcast.net 12/7/2020 20:04 approved hunter harrison hunter@davisgroupga.com 12/7/2020 19:54 approved Linnea Chasse linneachasse@yahoo.com 12/7/2020 15:55 approved christopher davis chris@davisgroupga.com 12/7/202015:11 approved Robert Crown bobbyacrown@me.com 12/7/2020 13:46 approved Richard Eckstein richardeckstein239@gmail.com 12/7/2020 13:30 approved Barbara Pezzuto Basha324@msn.com 12/7/2020 12:30 approved J K realestatesouthwestflorida@gmail.com 12/7/2020 12:25 approved aaron zwiefel azwief@gmail.com 12/7/2020 12:18 approved C Kaufman Clk_ny@yahoo.com 12/7/2020 12:17 approved Bryan Bo Bryanbo79@yahoo.com 11/26/2020 8:28 approved Anita Jenkins anita.jenkins@colliercountyfl.gov 11/24/2020 17:12 approved Sharon Umpenhour sumpenhour@hotmail.com 11/24/2020 16:00 cancelled by self Packet Pg. 2092 Petitions: PL20190002355, Immokalee Road/4th Street N.E. Mixed Use Subdistrict and; PL20190002356, Randall Curve MPUD Rezone December 9, 2020 Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM) 17.D.5 Packet Pg. 2093 17.D.5 Project Team • Richard Yovanovich, as trustee and not individually - Applicant • Richard D. Yovanovich, Esq., Land Use Attorney - Coleman, Yovanovich & Koester, P.A. • D. Wayne Arnold, AICP, Professional Planner - Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. • Mark Minor, P.E., Professional Planner - Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. • James M. Banks, PE, Traffic Engineer - JMB Transportation Engineering, Inc. • Marco A. Espinar, Environmental Planning/Biologist - Collier Environmental Consultants, Inc. w Y O E E a a C9 LO LO M N O O O N J d LO LO 0 N O N a 0 O 0 Z E Q Packet Pg. 2094 Location Map I i 41 SUBJECT PROP€R ff IN 1 ! f � I k+ LAM LA L ORANGETREE BOULEVARD s 17.D.5 N d a� Y - E IL f a f Lo i i Lo I SUBJECT PROPERTY { Cl) I N O O r~� N { J �r w I O Lo ' d N { a { V :{ o I, y ry y RANDALL BOULEVARD i 7_ Packet Pg. 2 5 vr�Nc�or,Eo esxir mow �I Area Location Map immoKALEF ROAD OIL WFLL ROAD 17.D.5 .N w Y O E a IL C9 Lo Lo M N O O O r O N J d Lo Lo r Packet Pg. 2096 17.D.5 Project Information Existing Future Land Use (FLU): Proposed FLU: Current Zoning: Proposed Zoning: w Rural Golden Gate Estates, Estates Designation, Mixed Use District, Estates Subdistrict Rural Golden Gate Estates, Estates Y Residential E a a C9 LO LO M N Designation, Mixed Use District, Immokalee Road/4th Street N.E. a. Mixed Use Subdistrict E, Estates Randall Curve MPUD Project Acreage: 50.18+/- acres LO to LO 0 N O N 0 W 0 0 z E Q Packet Pg. 2097 Proposed Request • The proposed Golden Gate Area Master Plan, Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub - Element amendment proposes to establish the Immokalee Road/4th Street N.E. Mixed Use Subdistrict. • The proposed subdistrict will provide for a variety of retail, office, personal service and residential land uses. • Access to the property will be via Immokalee Road, 4th Street N.E. and a vehicular interconnection with the property located immediately north of the subdistrict. • The maximum non-residential square footage permitted is 150,000 square feet. The maximum allowable number of residential dwelling units will be 400. • Proposed rezone from E, Estates to Randall Curve MPUD. Packet Pg. 2098 Proposed MPUD Master Plan j ZOc ED:E,ESTATES I u ZONED: E, ESTATES USE: RESIDENTIAL ZONED: E, ESTATES USE: UXDEVELOPE❑ POTENTIAL INTERCONNECTION I E� 1�fJ I +JfI !+f+ 1 r ZONED: ORANGETREE PUD YgE L CO MERCIALD 20' WIDE TYPE I TY LANDSCAPE DUFFER I I • A NRY RER EXERAL OCATION I I I 1 I j . J ■r ,� I !I ' 0©©� ZONED- ❑RANGETREE PUD USE- RESIDENTIALZON 'T USE R ESTATES USE: RESIDENTIAL I• J��r��/ J ■ / I! , I III WIDE TYPE 'D'LANDSCAPE J / J 20'LNIDE TYPE J LEGEND - BUFFER ---------------_ I BUFFER-ir LAN SCAPE ® DEVIATION L R RESIDENTIAL -------------- - ✓ I C COMMERCIAL ZONED:E,ESTATES USE: UNDES'ELDPED I I r l RESIDENTIAL j l I I� ZONED: ORANGETREE PU❑ USE: COMMERCIAL � t SCALE: 1" = 300' RANDALL CURYE HPUD ®GradyNbuor a; ; E%HIBIT C um rye N®nv MASTER PLAN s,.a..�... .f.. e•.,e,w.o...od .�. :. REVISED: SEPTENBER I". 2020 , TOTAL SITE AREA: 50.18t ACRE COMMERCIAL (C) 17t AC (34%) RESIDENTIAL (R) 20.5t AC (41%) 4TH STREET N_E_ ROW 1.57t AC (3%) WATER MANAGEMENT 2.8t AC (6%) LANDSCAPE BUFFERS 1.71 t AC (3%) PRESERVE 6.6t AC (13%) RESIDENTIAL- MAXIMUM 400 DWELLING UNITS COMMERCIAL: MAXIMUM 150,000 S.F. OPEN SPACE: REQUIRED: 30% PROVIDED: 30% PRESERVE: REQUIRED: 6 6 ACRES (43.9t ACRES NATIVE VEGETATION X 0.15) PROVIDED: 6.6 ACRES DEVIATIONS [SEE EXHIBIT 0 LDC SECTION 5.05.04.D.1., -GROUP HOUSING- ® LDC SECTION 5.05.05.D.2.A., -FACILITIES WITH FUEL PUMPS" 91 LDC SECTION 5.05.05.D.2.13., -FACILITIES WITH FUEL PUMPS- ® LDC SECTION 5.05.05.B.1., -TABLE OF SITE DESIGN REQUIREMENTS- LDC SECTION 6.06.02.A.1., -SIDEWALKS, BIKE LANE AND PATHWAY REQUIREMENTS- 0 E a IL LO LO M N O 0 0 r O N J d LO Lfl LO v C N CD N a L) d N O Z V Q Packet Pg. 2099 17.D.5 Conclusion Documents and information can be found online: • Gradyminor.com/Planning • Collier County GMD Public Portal: cvportal.colliergov.net/c/tyv/ewweb Next Steps • Hearing sign(s) posted on property advertising Planning Commission (CCPC) and Board of County Commissioner (BCC) hearing dates. • CCPC - TBD • BCC - TBD Contact: • Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A.: Sharon Umpenhour, Senior Planning Technician; sumpenhour@clradyminor.com or 239.947.1 144 extension 1249 • Collier County: PUDZ - Nancy Gundlach, AICP, Principal Planner, Nancy.Gundlach@colliercountyfl.gov or 239.252.2484 Q GMPA - Corby Schmidt, AICP, Principal Planner, Corby.Schmidt@colliercountyfl.gov or 239.252.2944 1 Packet Pg. 2100 17.D.5 Estates Shopping Center GMPA and CPUDA (PL20190002353 and PL20190002354) and Immokalee Road/4th Street N.E. Mixed Use Subdistrict and Randall Curve MPUD (PL20190002355 and PL20190002356) 12-09-2020 NIM Richard Yovanovich: You all, we're gonna go ahead, and get started. My name is Rich Yovanovich, and I am the Attorney representing, Crown Management who is the current owner and developer of the neighbor — the Estates Shopping Center piece of property which is at the corner of Golden Gate Boulevard and Wilson Boulevard, and the purchase — the contract purchaser of the roughly 50-acre parcel of property that's at the Randall — Northside of — of Immokalee Road at the Randall Curve piece of property that's currently owned by the County. We're here tonight to do, the County required neighborhood information meeting that is part of the process for doing a growth management plan amendment and for a rezone of a parcel of property. We are — we are in the process of amending the current Estates Shopping Center growth management plan subdistrict, and the, PUD, planned unit development zoning district that is on that piece of property. And we'll go through in the details of what we're doing there. Related to those two petitions is a growth management plan amendment for the 50 acres owned by the County. The parcel will be rezoned to planned unit development well. A condition of our acquiring the property is the successful rezone of the County property and the successful rezone of the property currently known as the Estates Shopping Center. Therefore, if we are unsuccessful either of those, basically, the land will stay as it is currently zoned, uh. As part of the neighborhood information meeting process, we are recording the — we record the meeting. We are having some Zoom participants. So, I — I — I tend to pace. So, if I am— Sharon will bring me back in front of this camera, so there'll be Zoom participants. We're gonna — we're gonna go over both petitions, and then we're gonna open up for questions or comments. When you do speak if you come up to the microphone so we can catch the recording. Also, you're not required to, but the Planning Commissioners prefer if you would identify yourself for the record as you — you could be generic and say I'm a resident of Golden Gate Estates near the Estates Shopping Center or I'm a resident of Golden Gate Estates near the Randall Curve property if you don't want to say your name. But they — they want to know who's commenting and their relationship to the proposed project so they — they can better Page 1 of 21 Packet Pg. 2101 17.D.5 Estates Shopping Center GMPA and CPUDA (PL20190002353 and PL20190002354) and Immokalee Road/4th Street N.E. Mixed Use Subdistrict and Randall Curve MPUD (PL20190002355 and PL20190002356) 12-09-2020 NIM understand the context of people's comments. We will try to always say for the record, Rich Yovanovich speaking, and Wayne Arnold will — will do the same for himself. Um, they just wanna know who's talking so they — they can get a better, understanding. We have — sorry — I want to introduce our team, and then we have some County Representatives here. Actually, when I initially spoke, I'm technically the Trustee that owns the property. I don't really own the property, but it's titled in my name, uh. So, I'm — I'm the Applicant on all of these petitions, uh. I'm also the Land Use Attorney on this. Wayne Arnold with GradyMinor is our Professional Planner. His boss is Sharon. He's been receiving all the correspondence with Sharon. If you have any questions, I'm sure your point of contact will be Sharon or Wayne. But if you have any questions after this meeting, you can contact either of them. Mark Minor's not here, but he's a Civil Engineer on the project. Jim Banks is our Transportation Consultant, and Marco Espinar is our Environmental Consultant. We didn't bring Marco into this meeting because I don't know that there are really any environmental issues related to either of the petitions. But if, you know, some questions come up, we'll get back to you on any of those — those questions. As I have — this is — this is the roughly, 60 acres that's the Estate — Sharon Umpenhour: Forty. Richard Yovanovich: Forty acres, sorry. The 40 acres that's the Estates Shopping Center property at the corner of Wilson Boulevard and Golden Gate Boulevard, and the top portion is the yellow. That's the roughly 50 acres that we have under contract with the County, uh. As I mentioned, they're — they're related petitions, and I've already forgotten to introduce Nancy Gundlach who is a Professional Planner on — which one are you? Which one's yours, Nancy? Nancy: I'm on the Randall Curve. Richard Yovanovich: She's — she's the planner for the Randall Curve property, and James Sabo is on Estates Shopping Center, and I think participating by Zoom is Corby Schmitt. Is he on the Zoom? Female Speaker: Yes, yes. Page 2 of 21 Packet Pg. 2102 17.D.5 Estates Shopping Center GMPA and CPUDA (PL20190002353 and PL20190002354) and Immokalee Road/4th Street N.E. Mixed Use Subdistrict and Randall Curve MPUD (PL20190002355 and PL20190002356) 12-09-2020 NIM Wayne Arnold: And Anita Jenkins. Richard Yovanovich: He — he — who else? Anita Jenkins: And Anita Jenkins. Richard Yovanovich: And Anita Jenkins are both — they are — they are handling the growth management plan amendments, and Anita actually supervises both the, growth management plan staff which is Corby, and the planning staff which is, Nancy and James. If you have questions of any of the County Representatives, they're — they're — they're readily available. You know, I'm sure they have business cards, and if they don't, they'll give you their email addresses. And you can, you can contact them with any — any questions you may have, uh. We're pretty informal. Really what we wanna do is tell you what we have planned with the petitions and then we wanna get your input. We also have representatives from Shy Wolf, who is, gonna be involved in the Estates Shopping Center property. So, if questions come up regarding Shy Wolf, those questions can be answered. I'm gonna turn it over to Wayne to go over the two petitions, and then we'll answer any questions you may have. Wayne Arnold: Thank you, Rich. So, sure. Thank you. I'm Wayne Arnold as Rich said and here representing both petitions, and there are a total of four. They're, growth management plan amendment and a rezoning application — Wayne: — for both applications on both sides. So, what we're gonna do is go through as Rich said both applications together, and then we'll take questions. We just thought it'd be more efficient than to break and have questions and answers on one and then the other. So, hope you indulge us if you're here for one or the other as you're gonna hear a little bit about both because as Rich mentioned they are related. So, the property for the Estates Shopping Center which I'll go through first is zoned planned unit development. We're amending that planned unit development. It's also part of the Estates Shopping Center subdistrict which is growth management category. We're amending that as well. And it's — the — the easiest way to summarize our changes is that we are — it's not — we are —essentially the Estates Shopping Center was approved for 150,000 square feet of Page 3 of 21 Packet Pg. 2103 17.D.5 Estates Shopping Center GMPA and CPUDA (PL20190002353 and PL20190002354) and Immokalee Road/4th Street N.E. Mixed Use Subdistrict and Randall Curve MPUD (PL20190002355 and PL20190002356) 12-09-2020 NIM commercial uses. It also required the first commercial use was going to be the grocery store. We are amending that request to reduce the commercial square footage to 50,000 square feet of general commercial type uses, and then we're also making provisions for government uses. A whole series of those governmental uses because Collier County will end up with a — a nominal, 10-acre parcel out of the 40-acre piece. And then we've made provisions for Shy Wolf and its educational programming and then sanctuary use to be on the Western -most parcel. So, we've had to amend the growth management plan language to accommodate those changes as well as our zoning, which lists a very detailed, uses. So, a couple things, we've created two new districts out of here, the commercial district is pretty self-evident. It's going to be right at the hard corner of Wilson and Golden Gate. But the Shy Wolf sanctuary parcel that we're calling it, we're calling it a semi-public use. And we're going back and forth with staff so we may change that terminology, but it allows things like we've talked about, animal shelters, arboreta, exhibitions, their educational facilities. We've made provisions for them to have single-family residential and dormitory use because they are an educational facility, and they're incorporation with Florida Gulf Coast or other universities that come and do some research on the animals. So, there will be provisions made for that residential component, that will probably initially utilize the single-family structures on the site for office space and some of the other uses that they have that eventually those, um, would be significantly modified, and they have a true education center established, and — and other structures. But for now, we've made provisions for them to have up to eight dwelling units on that property. The County's parcel which will be the — [inaudible] [00:09:121. Sorry about that, folks. It's a little slow, but the County's public uses, and I know there's information circulating out there in the Estates about this. So, in the — the growth management plan, then we've made a provision for a total of 50 dwelling units. We haven't been specific as to whether or not those are single-family or multi -family. The County asked us to make provisions for up to 30 units on the 10-acre parcel that they're obtaining as part of this deal. So, in addition to all the administrative, governmental type facilities Page 4 of 21 Packet Pg. 2104 17.D.5 Estates Shopping Center GMPA and CPUDA (PL20190002353 and PL20190002354) and Immokalee Road/4th Street N.E. Mixed Use Subdistrict and Randall Curve MPUD (PL20190002355 and PL20190002356) 12-09-2020 NIM that we've listed here by standard industrial classification codes, we've also made provisions for there to be up to 30 multi -family units. The reality is because we have well and septic here, I don't think it's realistic that the County's going to achieve 30 multi -family units on this parcel. We were asked to accommodate that as part of the request; so, we have. I know that that's been some discussion out there about that, and we'll be happy to hear those comments. But, again, we've also made provisions for single-family on the same parcel because should this deal not go forward, Crown Management that would control it, would then have the option to continue to do single-family that's permitted by right today. So, it says in our language that the single-family would be subject to the state's zoning district standards. So, you get what you could have today. So, the master plan that was approved as part of this growth management plan is the exhibit that's on the screen. It identified all — a large development area and then areas for utility plant site as well as some lights and buffers. So, we are modifying that. The new subdistrict is, generic. This would be an exhibit to the growth management plan which you can see that we have three separate parcels identified as commercial, public, and semi-public. We depict the access points that we're providing for the project on the master plan as well. The zoning master plan is a little bit more detailed than we showed on the growth management plan exhibit. This again is being modified to take out some of the detail in the footprints that were shown as future buildings on there. It's going to be revised to be a little bit more generic, but again, the preserve buffer areas get depicted on here. The access aspects are depicted. And again, we've identified which parcels would be used for public, semi-public, or the commercial uses that are going to be retained. So, where we are in the process, we submitted a few months ago. We've been through a couple rounds of reviews. We're — we're required to hold this neighborhood information meeting prior to going to public hearings. So, we don't have public hearings scheduled yet. But what will happen in this process, it's a two-step process; we'll have a transmittal process with the growth management plan assuming that the Board endorses it. They will take both of these, and they'll say, "We're ready to transmit the proposed changes." Page 5 of 21 Packet Pg. 2105 17.D.5 Estates Shopping Center GMPA and CPUDA (PL20190002353 and PL20190002354) and Immokalee Road/4th Street N.E. Mixed Use Subdistrict and Randall Curve MPUD (PL20190002355 and PL20190002356) 12-09-2020 NIM They'll go to the Department of Economic Opportunity, DEO at the State of Florida. The state gets 30 days to review those changes to determine if there are any state impacts or regional impacts, doubtful that they will weigh in on this, but it's a part of the process we have to go through. And then after that process, we would then come back in the PUD document, the zoning document would come together with the comp plan amendment. And the Planning Commission would again hear it together, and then that would then be heard by the Board of County Commissioners for final action. And our goal here is that all four of these applications will come together and be heard at the same Planning Commission and Board of County Commissioner meeting since they're interrelated. We think it makes more sense to be able to tell the whole story and deal with them in one — one time. So, that's our goal. We don't have hearing dates established yet, but our goal is to be through the process by June of 2021 which gets us there by — the Board takes a summer recess in July and August. So, our goal is to be completed in this process in June, no later than just next year. So, we think that's a doable process although we don't have hearing dates scheduled yet. The round of comments we got from staff were down to some fairly, I think, minor issues that are pretty easy to deal with. So, in a nutshell, that's — that's what we're hoping to achieve, and with that, I'm gonna wrap up this presentation. And, Sharon, if you can bring up the Randall Curve as we're calling it? It's really the County's property that's at the corner of Randall/4th Street Northeast and Immokalee Road. So, I'm gonna spend a few minutes talking about that process as well. Again, it's the same team so I'm not gonna through that information. Again, the location at — it's — everybody calls this the Randall Curve property that's been around a long time, so. We actually have a Randall Curve PUD that's part of the process, but our subdistrict for the comp plans that — for the mockup of 41h Street — 4th East subdistrict. Again, this property today is zoned the Estates. It does not have zoning on it that would allow the mixed -use project we're proposing. It's also part of the rural Golden Gate Estates. Comp plan does not make provisions for this to be a commercial mixed -use project that we're proposing. So, we've submitted, a new subdistrict that makes provisions for there to be up to 400 residential units on this property Page 6 of 21 Packet Pg. 2106 17.D.5 Estates Shopping Center GMPA and CPUDA (PL20190002353 and PL20190002354) and Immokalee Road/4th Street N.E. Mixed Use Subdistrict and Randall Curve MPUD (PL20190002355 and PL20190002356) 12-09-2020 NIM as well as 150,000 square feet of commercial uses. I'm gonna show you the proposed master plan for the Randall — Sharon Umpenhour: Go back, go back one. There you go. Wayne: — though this is the language that talks about our request. And a couple significant things I'll talk about is that we've made provisions for a large variety of retail uses. I know that there have been several discussions with members of the Estates Civic Association and other, community residents that have talked about the need for services out in this part of the community. So, we've made a very broad list of uses that largely are C-4 type uses I would say of the maximum intensity. There could be a couple of others depending on how the County categorizes those that would be C-5 because we've made provisions for there to be potential large format retailer or big box store whether that could be a Lowe's, a Home Depot, a Costco. We've made provisions for all of those as part of our request. It doesn't mean that those are going to be necessarily located there, but we've made provisions for them. We also have provisions there for the other types of uses we know people desire which are restaurants and offices and dental offices and things of that nature. So, I would, you know, just to — to know that this is a mixed -use project, Sharon's there's something on my screen. It's — it's some sort of system update. I don't know how to remove that. Let's take a pause for a moment. Thank you. So, this is a proposed master plan that we've created for what's called the Randall Curve PUD. It's the — this makes use, we have designated areas that are preserve, residential and commercial. C stands for commercial; the R is for residential. Preserve is labeled as such. It is conceptual, but it identifies two primary access aspects on Immokalee Road. We also have a shared access point with the properties to the North that's going through a similar process that we're in today. They're a little bit ahead of us. They've had their transmittal of the comp plan portion of their property to the State of Florida. So, we're — we're on track to being a couple months behind them. But the residential is sorta central to the site. We have our preserve area that separates us from the 4th Street residential. We have water management system that we have, and we've proposed no vehicular Page 7 of 21 Packet Pg. 2107 17.D.5 Estates Shopping Center GMPA and CPUDA (PL20190002353 and PL20190002354) and Immokalee Road/4th Street N.E. Mixed Use Subdistrict and Randall Curve MPUD (PL20190002355 and PL20190002356) 12-09-2020 NIM access to 41h Street Northeast. We would obviously make provisions for pedestrians and bicyclists to enter the site, but we prohibited vehicular traffic from accessing 41h. And we know that was an issue early on. When the County was looking at developing this themselves and we've heard that that's an issue, and we were asked on the property to the North also to remove any access to 4ffi Street which they have done as well. But you can see on this particular property that the uniqueness of this is when you go out there today, the — at the hard corner of 41h and Immokalee Road, that area's all the dry detention system for the County that was put in to satisfy the Immokalee Road widening project. So, that parcel is part of the acquisition. We have to take into consideration all of the drainage. So, we are going to have a larger system of either lake or dry detention to accommodate their five acres that they need today as well as the future improvements that they're planning to make on Randall Boulevard. We have to accommodate some of the additional drainage for them as well in addition to our drainage. So, that's been one of the unique challenges here, but nonetheless, we've accommodated. We can work around that, and we think this could be a very good, viable project. So, again, if we're in the same process that I just described for you for the other Estates property which was we're going to have the comp plan transmittal process. We going to have a PUD adoption at the same time that the comp plan would be adopted. And as Rich said, these are kinda bundle projects. One doesn't happen without the other with the way that this has been structured. Again, no hearing dates have been established, but we are working toward that same June deadline I just described. And hopefully, we can, be there, and like I said before, we're gonna take questions tonight. If you think of something after we leave here tonight, you'd like to communicate, Sharon has some cards at the back table. It's easier to email or call her for information. We're happy to share the presentation tonight with anybody who desires it. All the information's available on the County's website through CityView, or if you don't feel comfortable using that system, Sharon would be more than happy to provide any of the comp plan information as public record or any of the zoning information to you as well. Page 8 of 21 Packet Pg. 2108 17.D.5 Estates Shopping Center GMPA and CPUDA (PL20190002353 and PL20190002354) and Immokalee Road/4th Street N.E. Mixed Use Subdistrict and Randall Curve MPUD (PL20190002355 and PL20190002356) 12-09-2020 NIM So, Rich, I don't know if I left anything out, but I'm — I'm happy to answer questions. I will say one thing that one of the changes we did make on Estates that I failed to mention, we did even though we reduced the intensity of commercial from 150,000 — 50,000 square feet, we did add back end -use that we didn't have previously, and those were medical offices. We made provisions for medical offices and veterinary clinics that were something that was, desired by some folks who've been interested in the Estates. So, we've added those uses, and we think they're pretty benign uses overall and probably things that anybody who lives in that part of the community would probably utilize. So, with that, I'm gonna stop, and we're gonna — do you wanna take the Zoom callers first, Rich? Richard Yovanovich: Let's take people that are here first, and then, yeah. Wayne: Do the audience, okay, so, anybody who'd like to speak as Rich mentioned, you don't have to give us your name if you don't feel comfortable, but the Planning Commission wants to know if you're part of our team's feed or if you're a resident. So, if you feel comfortable saying you're a resident that way at least when the transcript gets created, they realize it's not Wayne or Rich or Sharon or Jim talking, so. Anybody with questions, please, feel free to come up and use the microphone. We can sanitize it between its use, and —yes, ma'am. Come on up. Phyllis: Phyllis Lit — Phyllis Litka, the 2nd Street Northeast, um, all of this involves even though I live out that way on part of the curve, um, I'd like to know, the low-income housing that you wanna put in on 10 acres, that's like four of my neighbors, how are you going to put 30 units? And when you say low-income, what are we talking? Wayne: Well, that — the low-income reference is not a term we use. Our language says essential service personnel that's actually in the document, and — Phyllis: Okay, on — on my form, that's what it says [inaudible] [00:21:231 Wayne: — and I — I don't know that that's our letter that said affordable housing. Richard Yovanovich: Can I see that? Do you mind? Page 9 of 21 Packet Pg. 2109 17.D.5 Estates Shopping Center GMPA and CPUDA (PL20190002353 and PL20190002354) and Immokalee Road/4th Street N.E. Mixed Use Subdistrict and Randall Curve MPUD (PL20190002355 and PL20190002356) 12-09-2020 NIM Phyllis: Sure, yeah, absolutely. Wayne: Our language says essential service personnel, and that's a term that the County's recently started using to refer to first responders, teachers, nurses, county employees, people like that, who are essential service personnel in our community that seem to be priced out — out of the housing market. Phyllis: Yeah, I can understand that. Wayne: As I mentioned before, the 30 units is the number that the County asked us to provide. If it's going to be multi -family housing, I — our — our opinion is just doesn't work because of the septic system requirements. Phyllis: Right. Wayne: So, I don't know that the County realistically is going to achieve 30 of those units in the — in the configuration of multi -family, but again, Rich, I don't know you wanna add any more. But we were asked to include it; so, we did. Richard Yovanovich: Yeah. I — a — as part of this process, obviously — yeah, you can sit right there. I'm sorry. As — as part of this process, obviously, we — we had to coordinate with the County because they're getting the 10 acres, and we — we basically said, "What would you like us to include on your property?" So, the County gave us their list of requested uses. I have been doing this for a while so I kinda figured when the County said they wanted to put 30 units on a 10-acre piece of property that basically can have four under the current state zoning, I thought that was, gonna meet some resistance from the residents of the Estates. And I said, "I'm happy to include it, but you need to be at the neighborhood information meeting to defend it." And, I don't think there's anybody here from the County to address that. I don't think Nancy or James are — are — are — they were not the people I spoke to, uh. So, the — the — Wayne is correct. What you received, eh — we are not proposing low-income housing. I don't know who sent that out. We are — we are proposing essential service personnel — the Page 10 of 21 Packet Pg. 2110 17.D.5 Estates Shopping Center GMPA and CPUDA (PL20190002353 and PL20190002354) and Immokalee Road/4th Street N.E. Mixed Use Subdistrict and Randall Curve MPUD (PL20190002355 and PL20190002356) 12-09-2020 NIM County's proposing essential service personnel housing, which is exactly what Wayne says, firefighters, teachers. But the number of units and the request for that use came from Collier County, uh. I think Commissioner McDaniels was on his way to this meeting. I just texted him to find out where he is, but he's — he is on his way. If he doesn't make it here before we get gone, I'm sure he'll read the record. But I — I think there's others here who also, have concerns about that use. So, we will obviously communicate that to County staff and, will follow their direction whether to remove that, um, request or not. But obviously, I know that's — I knew that was gonna be an issue before I even submitted the document, so, with any more questions? Wayne: This is Wayne. Can I just read you the language that's actually in the PUD document under public use? It says, "Essential service personnel housing not to exceed 30 units subject to develop standards for RM-6 zoning which would be the land development code." So, that is what's in the actual document. There's also a provision for there to be multi -family units which was meant to implement that essential service personnel housing. But there are as Rich mentioned, there's also a provision in there for single-family homes which is what could be there on that [inaudible — crosstalk] [00:24:53]. Richard Yovanovich: Right, and — and Tim's okay. Tim and I had a conversation about this very issue twice, and — and I told him the reason we put single- family houses in there is if for some reason Shy Wolf does not close on their piece of property or the County decides they wanna develop it as the common state lots, we just wanted that as — as — as also an option. So, I mean, that clearly Tim would have an issue with that. I hope nobody else has an issue with that piece. Wayne: Thank you, any other comments, or questions? Tim: Tim Wallen, 111, 3rd Street Northwest, uh. We're adjacent to the 40-acre, uh. As you guys know, we've been involved with this for 12 years now. So, when we started talking with Bob and, Shy Wolf and about the swap of the property, it seemed like, it was something real good for everybody in the community, for both sides, um. Again, the multi -unit, it would have to be low-income because they're gonna be like 200 square feet if they put `em there. Um, you know, when we first started doing this, we discussed Page 11 of 21 Packet Pg. 2111 17.D.5 Estates Shopping Center GMPA and CPUDA (PL20190002353 and PL20190002354) and Immokalee Road/4th Street N.E. Mixed Use Subdistrict and Randall Curve MPUD (PL20190002355 and PL20190002356) 12-09-2020 NIM services from the County whether it be post office, police substation, some, you know, tag agency. I know it's right across the street right now or some sorta County presence that — that's needed out here, not housing. Housing just seems really stupid. The intersection is already stressed. Anybody that comes from the East traveling West to go there in the — to go to work in the morning, it — it's already a nightmare trying to get through Wilson Boulevard. To put all those cars and all that right there is a huge problem, again, septic and water. I think everyone else is — everybody's probably pretty comfortable with, but, you know, for the record, the — the multi — the multi -housing is — is — is definitely a — a killer. Male Speaker: Okay. Male Speaker: You know, it's if — so I can just put it on the record, can I just get a show of hands how many people are opposed to putting that multi- family on that piece of property. Male Speaker: So, I'm just gonna count the number of — one, two, three — Female Speaker: All of us. Female Speaker: Eleven. Female Speaker: So, [inaudible — crosstalk]. Male Speaker: So, I would say, if there's I I — there's 11 people present, and I think every one of them are not related to our team or Shy Wolf. So, I would say that pretty much everybody, is opposed to that. I just wanna — I just wanna put that on the record. So, both whoever reads the transcript knows so you all don't have to come up and repeat yourselves. Or you're welcome to come up anytime you want, but I just wanted to save some people some effort. Any other questions, comments before we go to people on Zoom? Jeff Curl: Yeah, for the record, Jeff Curl, um. I live actually off Desoto, but I do traverse Wilson and Golden Gate Boulevard quite a bit. I'm just wondering if the County has any intentions of doing rotaries at Wilson/Golden Gate Boulevard. That seems to be there brand-new, um, FDOT experiment and then how you guys would see traffic West of this intersection, and this Page 12 of 21 Packet Pg. 2112 17.D.5 Estates Shopping Center GMPA and CPUDA (PL20190002353 and PL20190002354) and Immokalee Road/4th Street N.E. Mixed Use Subdistrict and Randall Curve MPUD (PL20190002355 and PL20190002356) 12-09-2020 NIM may be more of a Jim question with maybe left turns, right turns coming out, signals expansions, turn lanes, and maybe a U-turn or two through the median. Um, I'm assuming you — you're gonna remember from your time out there, too, Jim, um, that to the previous gentleman's point that traffic through there at rush hour's an absolute nightmare. Jim Banks: Yeah, right now, the only traffic signal's — Jim: Well, my bill is still extra, but okay. Jeff: You didn't sanitize this [inaudible — crosstalk] [00:29:06]. Jim: Maybe I can step way back here. Jeff: I'm gonna get the COVID. Jim: so, anyhow, to answer Jeff's question, you know, obviously, the intersection at Wilson and Golden Gate is currently signalized — Jeff: Right. Jim: — there's not enough separation between the E-western-most boundary of the property which is on 3rd Street to have a traffic light at that location. So, we will not have another traffic light service development, but that is one of the reasons that the commercial is in the corner of that — of that intersection now. And the lower intense uses are further to the West which will — it's our interpretation will not warrant a traffic signal, at those — at those intersections. But, yes, when we're going to the site development phase, we're gonna have to look at extending some of those left -turn lanes to provide for U-turns and that type of thing, mostly for the commercial uses. So, there will be some upgrades there in that general vicinity to accommodate additional turning moves they're gonna — but I do wanna point out that what is being proposed today is actually gonna generate substantially less traffic than what was previously approved. So, with this application, traffic demands from this 40 acres is going to be substantially reduced versus if it's developed then with the 150,000. Jeff: So, this is gonna dovetail into our previous — Page 13 of 21 Packet Pg. 2113 17.D.5 Estates Shopping Center GMPA and CPUDA (PL20190002353 and PL20190002354) and Immokalee Road/4th Street N.E. Mixed Use Subdistrict and Randall Curve MPUD (PL20190002355 and PL20190002356) 12-09-2020 NIM Sharon: Can you guys hold on a second? Um, Jeremy, the Zoom participants aren't able to hear Jim. [Crosstalk] Jim: Okay. Sharon: Go ahead. Jeff: So, that also brings back to your point about multi -family and increasing the density at that site with residential, I think that'd be another, you know, point raised when we [inaudible — crosstalk] [00:30:511. Jim: Well, I — I would submit to you that I don't think all the — all the uses that are being proposed could all fit on the 40 acres so some things gotta give. Jeff: Yeah, and I think I'm honed in on that essential service kind of the boondoggle that we keep talking about here tonight, um. Jeff: No, I just — the County's trending, eh — again, FDOT getting a pave - type deal with rotaries and things like that to — to push traffic through quickly, you're talking about two lights that are fairly close together, um. And so, yeah, perhaps they're gonna keep that sequencing with each directional rush hour push, morning and at night, but, uh. I didn't know if there were any preliminary discussions. Jim: As far as I know, they've got no plans to put a traffic circle there at that intersection. I don't even think they have the right of way to do it, um. Jeff: I wouldn't think with E's there on the corner either, but. Jim: Right, so, but not — my interpretation is we will not see a round- about at that intersection. Jeff: Okay. All right, thank you, gentlemen. Male Speaker: Thank you, Jeff. Wayne: So, I guess without moving — Page 14 of 21 Packet Pg. 2114 17.D.5 Estates Shopping Center GMPA and CPUDA (PL20190002353 and PL20190002354) and Immokalee Road/4th Street N.E. Mixed Use Subdistrict and Randall Curve MPUD (PL20190002355 and PL20190002356) 12-09-2020 NIM Rich: Anybody else here that wants — yes, sir, come on up. Female Speaker: Wayne? Wayne: Yeah, I have sanitized the microphone [inaudible] getting COVID Sharon: Sorry. I've already had it, so I don't have to worry about it. [Crosstalk] Dave: My name is, Dave Meffin, um, 127th Street Northwest, and, so, even though it's not right next to my neighborhood, it's pretty close. And, I just, you know, I — I agree with this gentleman down here, but, um. I just wanna know anybody in our neighborhood who would be in favor of that. I mean, if you can find 10 people, I'd be happy. Wayne: You're speaking about this essential service housing? Dave: Yes. Wayne: Okay. I — I think as Rich said, the show of hands was pretty unanimous that, those in attendance certainly aren't supportive — Dave: I mean, if we had more time, and we could, you know, word of mouth a little more, we could get a thousand people in here; a thousand hands would be up, so. Wayne: Well, I — I have a little experience on this use of property, and I know you can get a lot of people out, right, sir? So, I — we — you know, we understand that will communicate to the County the, uh — the, unanimous opposition for those who are here to — including that multi -family housing, and I'm sure from watching James write that down right now, so. I'm sure that will be communicated to the powers that be, the County. Anybody else, anybody else here who wants to come up and speak before we go to those on Zoom? Laura: Hi, my name is Laura, and I'm a resident of the Estates. And, okay, that 10 acres, I'm like, "Why not make it a park? Why not make it something fun? And if you need to add a post office to it, you know, 10 acres is a good size, but we don't really have enough free area out on the Estates for, you know, like kids' playgrounds, stuff like that. They have plenty of it in the city. And so, I'm like, "Forget about that. Put it on that little 4th Street there. Well, we don't wanna it there either, so, the essential service." So, I'm just wanna make Page 15 of 21 Packet Pg. 2115 17.D.5 Estates Shopping Center GMPA and CPUDA (PL20190002353 and PL20190002354) and Immokalee Road/4th Street N.E. Mixed Use Subdistrict and Randall Curve MPUD (PL20190002355 and PL20190002356) 12-09-2020 NIM sure that my vote is no, and I'm just emphasizing that. Wayne: Okay, and just for you know to ma'am, this is Wayne Arnold for the record, but we include parks as one of the uses for the County parcel. It's just — Laura: Okay. Oh — so, who decides once — Wayne: The County Commission ultimately will decide what use it would be there, but I think it's pretty clear tonight the direction it's headed with regard to the housing. Laura: Okay, thank you. Wayne: Thank you. Richard Yovanovich: I wanted to make two points, one, Commissioner McDaniels just entered the room, uh. Comm'r McDaniels: How's everybody doing? Richard Yovanovich: And, just to recap, um, everybody in this room is opposed to essential service personnel housing, that 30 units on the County's parcel in the Estates. Male Speaker: At Wilson — at Wilson and the Boulevard? Richard Yovanovich: Yes, yes, yes. Comm'r McDaniels: So, noted. Richard Yovanovich: I just want — wanted to make sure you're aware of that. Female Speaker: We raised our hands. Richard Yovanovich: And — and it just — and it just — just kinda going back a little bit of history, you know, on the Estates Shopping Center parcel, that — that — the hard corner piece set between Pt and — and Wilson was formally a neighborhood center where commercial was supposed to go in the first place. So, we're kinda going back to pretty much the original plan of — of Golden Gate Estates, by going through this process. And with that, any more questions or comments before we go to Zoom, participants? Page 16 of 21 Packet Pg. 2116 17.D.5 Estates Shopping Center GMPA and CPUDA (PL20190002353 and PL20190002354) and Immokalee Road/4th Street N.E. Mixed Use Subdistrict and Randall Curve MPUD (PL20190002355 and PL20190002356) 12-09-2020 NIM Wayne: Okay, going to Zoom, Sharon, you wanna go ahead and call names and see if we have any questions on Zoom if they raised their hand? Sharon: Um, if they speak, they can raise their hand; I can unmute them. Wayne: If you have a question or comment you'd like to make and you're on Zoom, if you'd raise your hand if you — if you know how to hit that icon, and then Sharon will unmute. And we will be happy to let the rest of the crowd hear what you have to say. Richard Yovanovich: All right. How many — how many Zoom participants? Wayne: The question is how many Zoom participants do we have? Sharon Umpenhour: Fourteen but two are County staff, um. Wayne: So, we have 14 total Zoom participants and two of which are County. Richard Yovanovich: Anybody raising their hand? Sharon Umpenhour: No, but if you wanna ask them if they just — if someone wants to ask a question to unmute and ask a question. Wayne: Okay, so — so if you have a question, do — can you unmute, and then we'll know that you do have a question? Sharon Umpenhour: It doesn't look like anyone has a question. Wayne: I — I don't — I don't see anybody raising their hand or unmuting. So, I take it that none of our Zoom participants at this moment have question or comment, so. Anybody else in the room, Mr. Wallen, do you have a question? Richard Yovanovich: Wayne? Wayne, do you wanna, see if everybody on the Zoom call is opposed to the 30 units as well? Is there a way to find that out? Sharon Umpenhour: Oh, Scott Baxter has his hand raised. Wayne: We have, Scott Baxter, you have your hand raised. Do you wanna unmute and ask your question or make your comment? Scott, I'm not hearing ya. It looks like you're still muted on our end. Sharon Umpenhour: You still — you have to unmute, Scott. There you go. Page 17 of 21 Packet Pg. 2117 17.D.5 Estates Shopping Center GMPA and CPUDA (PL20190002353 and PL20190002354) and Immokalee Road/4th Street N.E. Mixed Use Subdistrict and Randall Curve MPUD (PL20190002355 and PL20190002356) 12-09-2020 NIM Wayne: There you are. Scott Baxter: — unmute, I'm not sure if it's working or not. Wayne: We hear ya. Scott: Okay. Um, I'm trying to — you know, you're talking about putting 30 units on 10 acres. So, to be generous, we're only gonna have three units per acre because then there will be no streets, no buffers, no sidewalks. Everybody that's [inaudible] [00:37:471. However, this property was promised as a park. Is that not in here? Male Speaker: It is not a park. Wayne: Today it is not a park. It is zoned for a commercial shopping center Scott: I understand that. Is the property staying — I thought this property was promised to us as a park. Wayne: It — it — I'll let Rich address that for you. Richard Yovanovich: Yeah. For the record, Rich Yovanovich, actually, what — what the property exchange agreement says is we would give the County the 10 acres. The County would then decide what it wanted to put on the property, and obviously, a park is an option and other government services is an option. Wayne: To the list, the uses we got for this 10 acres came from Collier County. And this — the purpose of this meeting is for the community who — to give their input back to all of us about what we're asking for as part of this PUD. And I assume you're like the other members that are present that you oppose the multi -family option on that 10- acre piece. Is that correct? Scott? Richard Yovanovich: Scott, can you — move? Scott: [Audio cuts out] [00:39:05] — Male Speaker: Broke up. Male Speaker: Breaking up. Page 18 of 21 Packet Pg. 2118 17.D.5 Estates Shopping Center GMPA and CPUDA (PL20190002353 and PL20190002354) and Immokalee Road/4th Street N.E. Mixed Use Subdistrict and Randall Curve MPUD (PL20190002355 and PL20190002356) 12-09-2020 NIM [Crosstalk] Female Speaker: He said he's opposed. Richard Yovanovich: Okay. Wayne: Scott? Any other comments, Scott, or should we — anybody else on Zoom? Male Speaker: Yes, an upgraded Wi-Fi. [Crosstalk] Wayne: try again one more time. You're still a little muddled. Anybody remember when you had antennas on your TV, and you had to smack it or stand like this? [Crosstalk] Is there anybody else on — on Zoom that — that wants to, um, speak? Sharon Umpenhour: Maggie Kemp. Richard Yovanovich: Maggie Kemp, it looks like. Wayne: Maggie Kemp, you're up. Maggie Kemp: Hi, I just wanted to also voice my opposition to putting in low- income housing on such a small space, seems like the County seems to be forgetting about the residents and the impact on the residents that are around these projects. Wayne: Okay, thank you. Anybody else wanna make any comments on Zoom? Richard Yovanovich: Susan Risner — Rissen. Wayne: Susan, you're up, Ruse — Rusing. Am I close? Sharon: No, she's not on. Richard Yovanovich: She's unmuted. Page 19 of 21 Packet Pg. 2119 17.D.5 Estates Shopping Center GMPA and CPUDA (PL20190002353 and PL20190002354) and Immokalee Road/4th Street N.E. Mixed Use Subdistrict and Randall Curve MPUD (PL20190002355 and PL20190002356) 12-09-2020 NIM Wayne: She unmuted. I just didn't know if she wanted to speak or not. Sharon: She's not got audio. Rich: Okay. Wayne: Oh, okay. anybody else on Zoom? Okay, one more go -round in here, anybody else wanna say anything? Phyllis: It's me again, Phyllis Litka, question on the Curve. The 400 units, are those houses, or are those apartments? Wayne: They — they — they will be — we make — we'd make provisions for both, but it — it'll be a multi -family, more likely a multi -family product. Phyllis: Okay. Wayne: It could be condos. It could be apartments. We — we don't have that final decision yet. Phyllis: Okay. And when — next question, you said something about 41 `cause I live on 2"d, so, yeah, it's the next street. So, 4th, they will not be able to come through 4th where they were gonna make that street, you know, behind all of, um, the storefronts? Richard Yovanovich: The, yeah, for the record, Rich Yovanovich, we — we — we — in the Curve property, the 50 acres were talking about tonight, there is absolutely no access on 4th other than we will make provisions for bicyclists or pedestrians that are coming up and down 4th but no cars will have access. Phyllis: Well, one of the other meetings that I was going to — had gone to, they were going to make a road. Yeah, mm-hmm, mm-hmm. Richard Yovanovich: And that — that was I think Wayne was involved in that one. It was the property to the North, um. Wayne: No — they no longer have access. That project removed their — any access and it's prohibiting to have access to 4th Phyllis: Oh, thank you. Okay, that's why you should go to meetings. Wayne: We appreciate you coming. Page 20 of 21 Packet Pg. 2120 17.D.5 Estates Shopping Center GMPA and CPUDA (PL20190002353 and PL20190002354) and Immokalee Road/4th Street N.E. Mixed Use Subdistrict and Randall Curve MPUD (PL20190002355 and PL20190002356) 12-09-2020 NIM Richard Yovanovich: Anybody else? Tim: I — I was just gonna — I was just curious who the two County people were. Wayne: Mr. Wallen, Tim, why don't you come forward? Sharon: You need to speak into the microphone, please. Richard Yovanovich: I'll say it for you. Mr. Wallen wanted to know who the two County people were on the phone, and it was — I think I said it earlier, Anita Jenkins who is, Zoning Director, and, Corby Schnitt who is the Growth Management Reviewer — Plan Reviewer for this project. Those are the two County. Yes? Sharon: Actually, it's Michelle Mosca for Anita. Richard Yovanovich: Okay, well, Michelle Mosca who, also is in Growth Management is sitting in for Anita Jenkins, and, she's been with the County for quite a while and is familiar with the comprehension plan. Anybody else? All right, well, we thank you for coming and I hope everybody enjoys their holiday season and stay safe. Thank you. [End of Audio] Duration: 44 minutes Page 21 of 21 Packet Pg. 2121 17.D.6 CAT County �tPIN1<<^��� �igtaS COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliercountyfl.gov 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Hybrid Virtual Quasi -Judicial Public Hearing Waiver For Petition Number(s): Emergency/Executive Order 2020-04 Hearing of the Collier County Planning Commission and Board of County Commissioners PL20190002355 (Immokalee Rd./4th St. N.E. Mixed Use Subdistrict) Richard D. Yovanovich as Successor Trustee Regarding the above subject petition number(s), (Name of Applicant) elects to proceed during the declared emergency with hybrid virtual public hearings of the Collier County Planning Commission and Board of County Commissioners, and waives the right to contest any procedural irregularity due to the hybrid virtual nature of the public hearing. Richard D. Yovanovich as Successor Trustee Name: Signature*:'� ❑✓ Applicant ❑ Legal Counsel to Applicant Date: 3121'ZU'2 1 * This form must be signed by either the Applicant (if the applicant is a corporate entity, this must be an officer of the corporate entity) or the legal counsel to the Applicant. Packet Pg. 2122 17.D.7 (CHAPTER 8, COLLIER COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE FOR LAND DEVELOPMENT) A zoning sign(s) must be posted by the petitioner or the petitioner's agent on the parcel for a minimum of fifteen (15) calendar days in advance of the first public hearing and said sign(s) must be maintained by the petitioner or the petitioner's agent through the Board of County Commissioners Hearing. Below are general guidelines for signs, however these guidelines should not be construed to supersede any requirement of the LDC. For specific sign requirements, please refer to the Administrative Code, Chapter 8 E. The sign(s) must be erected in full view of the public, not more than five (5) feet from the nearest street right-of-way or easement. The sign(s) must be securely affixed by nails, staples, or other means to a wood frame or to a wood panel and then fastened securely to a post, or other structure. The sign may not be affixed to a tree or other foliage. The petitioner or the petitioner's agent must maintain the sign(s) in place, and readable condition until the requested action has been heard and a final decision rendered. If the sign(s) is destroyed, lost, or rendered unreadable, the petitioner or the petitioner's agent must replace the sign(s) NOTE: AFTER THE SIGN HAS BEEN POSTED, THIS AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE SHOULD BE RETURNED NO LATER THAN TEN (10) WORKING DAYS BEFORE THE FIRST HEARING DATE TO THE ASSIGNED PLANNER. AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER BEFORE THE UNDERSIGNED AUTHORITY, PERSONALLY APPEARED SHARON UMPENHOUR WHO ON OATH SAYS THAT HE/SHE HAS POSTED PROPER NOTICE AS REQUIRED BY SECTION 10.03.00 OF THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE ON THE PARCEL COVERED IN PETITION NUMBER(S) SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT OR AGENT Sharon Umpenhour as Senior Planning Technician for Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. NAME (TYPED OR PRINTED) STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF Lee 3800 Via Del Rey STREET OR P.O. BOX Bonita Springs, Florida 34110 CITY, STATE ZIP The foregoing instrument was sworn to and subscribed before me this 28 day of April , 2021, by Sharon Umpenhour as Senior Planning Technician for Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A., personally known to me erne and who dmidMid not take anoath. P CiARIN J. DWYER MY COMMISSION # GG 982367 Signature of Nota Public EXPIRES: May 14, 2024 "•' ofF;? Bonded ThnuNot" public UndeMilers Carin J. Dwyer Printed Name of Notary Public My Commission Expires: (Stamp with serial number) Rev. 3/4/2015 Packet Pg. 2123 w iN 'PUBLIC �I G NOTICE"'. 1MMOKALEE RD./4TH S � i. MIXED USE SUBDISTRICT GROWTH MANAGE ENT PLAN AMENDMENT PETITION Nf PL20190002355 CCPC: APRIL 2021 - 9.00 a.m. BCC: MAY 25 2021 - 9:00 a.m. 4 CULLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER, 3flQ FLOOR 3299 EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL, NAPLES, FL 34112 SUE FALKNER, PRINCIPAL ,PLANNER: 239-252-5715 . uO uO M N O O O O O N J d 17. D.8 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will,b$ held by the Collier County Board of County Commissioners on May 25, 2021, in the Board of County Commissioners Meeting Room, Third Floor, Collier Government Center, 3299 East Tamiami Trail, Naples, FL, to Consider the enactment of a County Resolution. The meeting will commence at 9:00 A.M. The title of the proposed Resolution is as follows: A RESOLUTION OF- THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA PROPOSING AMENDMENT TO ORDINANCE NO. 89-05, AS AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, SPECIFICALLY AMENDING THE RURAL GOLDEN GATE ESTATES SUB -ELEMENT OF THE GOLDEN GATE AREA MASTER PLAN AND THE RURAL GOLDEN GATE ESTATES FUTURE LAND USE MAP AND MAP SERIES TO CREATE THE IMMOKALEE ROAD/4TH STREET N.E. MIXED USE SUBDISTRICT BY CHANGING THE DESIGNATION OF THE PROPERTY FROM THE ESTATES -MIXED USE DISTRICT, RESIDENTIAL ESTATES SUBDISTRICT TO THE ESTATES -MIXED USE DISTRICT, IMMOKALEE ROAD/4TH STREET N.E. MIXED USE SUBDISTRICT, TO ALLOW USES PERMITTED BY RIGHT AND CONDITIONAL USE IN THE GENERAL COMMERCIAL (C-4) ZONING DISTRICT WITH A TOTAL MAXIMUM INTENSITY OF UP TO 150,000 SQUARE FEET OF GROSS FLOOR AREA. OF DEVELOPMENT, AND A MAXIMUM OF 400 RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS, AND FURTHERMORE DIRECTING TRANSMITTAL OF THE AMENDMENT TO THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED ON THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE INTERSECTION OF IMMOKALEE ROAD AND 4TH STREET NE IN SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 48 NORTH, RANGE 27 EAST, CONSISTING OF 50.18t ACRES. [PL20190002355] Project Location 0 J m C O _y Randall BLVD imrr►okalee RD A copy of the proposed Resolution is on file with the Clerk to the Board and is available for inspection. All interested parties are invited to attend and be heard. NOTE: All persons wishing to speak on any agenda item must register with the County manager prior to presentation of the agenda item to be addressed. Individual speakers will be limited to 3 minutes on any item. The selection of any individual to speak on behalf of an organization or group is encouraged. If recognized by the Chairman, a spokesperson for a group or organization may be allotted 1`0 minutes to speak on an item. Persons wishing to have written or graphic materials included in the Board agenda packets must submit said material a minimum of 3 weeks prior to the respective public hearing. In, any case, written materials intended to be considered by the Board shall be submitted to the appropriate County staff a minimum of seven days prior to the public hearing. All materials used in presentations before the Board will become a permanent part of the record. As part of an ongoing initiative to promote social distancing during the COVID-19 pandemic, the public will have the opportunity to provide public comments remotely, as well•as in person, during this proceeding. Individuals who would like to participate remotely, should register any time after the agenda is posted on the County website which is 6 days before the meeting through the link provided on the front page of the County website at www.colliercount i.00v. Individuals who register will receive an email in advance of the public hearing detailing how they can participate remotely in this meeting. For additional information about the meeting, please call Geoffrey Willig at 252-8369 or email to Geoffrey.Willig@colliercounw.00v. Any person who decides to appeal any decision of the Board will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto and therefore, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is based. If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the, provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Division, located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 101, Naples, FL 34112-5356, (239) 252-8380, at least two days prior to the meeting. Assisted listening devices for the hearing impaired are available in the Board of County Commissioners Office. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA PENNY TAYLOR, CHAIRMAN CRYSTAL K. KINZEL, CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT & COMPTROLLER By: Teresa Cannon Deputy Clerk (SEAL) ND-(3C�OBM13031-Ot E Packet Pg. 2126 Immokalee Road/4th Street N.E. Mixed Use Subdistrict (PL20190002355) Application and Supporting Documents April 1,, 2021 CCPC Hearing ® GradyMinor Civf] Fngfneem • Land Surveyors • Planners • Landscape Architects Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, FL 34134 • 239-947-1144 • engineering@gradyminor.com • www.gradyminor.com GradyMinor Civil Engineers • Land Surveyors • Planners • Landscape Architects May 21, 2020 Mr. Corby Schmidt, AICP Principal Planner Collier County Growth Management Division/ Planning and Regulation Land Development Services Department Comprehensive Planning Section 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 RE: Collier County Growth Management Plan Amendment Application Immokalee Road/4th Street N.E. Mixed Use Subdistrict (PL20190002355), Submittal 1 Dear Mr. Schmidt: A Collier County Growth Management Plan Amendment (GMPA) application for properties located at the northeast quadrant of Immokalee Road and 4th Street N.E. is being submitted for review. This application proposes to create a new subdistrict in the Golden Gate Area Master Plan, Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub -Element to allow up to 150,000 square feet of gross floor area of commercial uses, senior housing uses and a maximum of 400 residential dwelling units in the subdistrict. The GMPA is supported with a companion PUD rezone (PL20190002356), which establishes the specific development standards for the proposed uses, and a Master Plan for development of the 50± acre property. Please feel free to contact me should you have any questions. Sincerely, <-D. �P�- D. Wayne Arnold, AICP c: Richard D. Yovanovich GradyMinor File (RCIRP-19) Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. Ph. 239-947-1144 Fax. 239-947-0375 3800 Via Del Rey EB 0005151 LB 0005151 LC 26000266 Bonita Springs, FL 34134 www.gradyminor.com APPLICATION NUMBER: PL20190002355 DATE RECEIVED: PRE -APPLICATION CONFERENCE DATE: October 30, 2019 This application, with all required supplemental data and information, must be completed and accompanied by the appropriate fee, and returned to the Growth Management Department 239-252- 2400, Zoning Division, Comprehensive Planning Section, 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida 34104. The application is to be reviewed by staff for sufficiency within 30 calendar days following the filing deadline. The applicant will be notified, in writing, of the sufficiency determination. If insufficient, the applicant will have 30 days to remedy the deficiencies. For additional information on the processing of the application, see Resolution 12-234. If you have any questions, please contact the Comprehensive Planning Section at 239-252-2400. SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS I. GENERAL INFOMRATION A. Name of Applicant: Richard D. Yovanovich, Esq. Company: Coleman, Yovanovich & Koester, P.A. Address: 4001 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 300 City Naples State Florida Zip Code 34103 Phone Number: 239-435-3535 Fax Number: Email Address: ryovanovich@cyklawfirm.com B. Name of Agent* D. Wayne Arnold, AICP • THIS WILL BE THE PERSON CONTACTED FOR ALL BUSINESS RELATED TO THE PETITION. Company: Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. Address: 3800 Via Del Rey City Bonita Springs State Florida Zip Code 34134 Phone Number: 239-947-1 144 Fax Number: Email Address: warnold@gradyminor.com C. Name of Owner (s) of Record: Collier County a Political Subdivision of the State of Florida Address: C/O Real Property Management, 3335 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 101 City Naples State Florida Zip Code 34112 Phone Number: Email Address: Fax Number: D. Name, Company, Address and Qualifications of all consultants and other professionals providing information contained in this application, as well as Qualifications of the Agent identified above. II. Disclosure of Interest Information: A. If the property is owned fee simple by an INDIVIDUAL, Tenancy by the entirety, tenancy in common, or joint tenancy, list all parties with an ownership interest as well as the percentage of such interest. (Use additional sheets if necessary). Name and Address Percentage of Ownership Not Applicable B. If the property is owned by a CORPORATION, list the officers and stockholders and the percentage of stock owned by each. Name and Address Percentage of Stock Collier County, A Political Subdivision of the State of Florida 100% C. If the property is in the name of a TRUSTEE, list the beneficiaries of the trust with the percentage of interest. Not Applicable D. If the property is in the name of a GENERAL or LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, list the name of the general and/or limited partners. Name and Address Percentage of Ownership Not Applicable If there is a CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE, with an individual or individuals, a Corporation, Trustee, or a Partnership, list the names of the contract purchasers below, including the officers, stockholders, beneficiaries, or partners. Name and Address Percentage of Ownership Richard D. Yovanovich as Successor Trustee of Land Trust 850.024 100% under Land Trust Agreement dated December 1, 2005 Robert A and Barbara A Crown, c/o Crown Management Services, 207 Cherry Hill Drive, Presto, PA 15142-1087 Richard D. Yovanovich as Successor Trustee of Land Trust 850.031 100% under Land Trust Agreement dated December 1, 2005 Robert A and Barbara A Crown, c/o Crown Management Services, 207 Cherry Hill Drive, Presto, PA 15142-1087 Richard D. Yovanovich as Successor Trustee under Land Trust 100% Agreement Dated June 10, 2009 known as Trust Number 850.045 Robert A and Barbara A Crown, c/o Crown Management Services, 207 Cherry Hill Drive, Presto, PA 15142-1087 Richard D. Yovanovich as Successor Trustee of the Golden Gate 100% Boulevard West Trust Robert A and Barbara A Crown, c/o Crown Management Services, 207 Cherry Hill Drive, Presto, PA 15142-1087 Date of Contract: September 24, 2019 F. If any contingency clause or contract terms involve additional parties, list all individuals or officers, if a corporation, partnership, or trust. Name and Address Not Applicable G. Date subject property acquired (2006) leased ( ):-Term of lease: yrs./mos. If, Petitioner has option to buy, indicate date of option: and date option terminates: , or anticipated closing: NOTE: H. Should any changes of ownership or changes in contracts for purchase occur subsequent to the date of application, but prior to the date of the final public hearing, it is the responsibility of the applicant, or agent on his behalf, to submit a supplemental disclosure of interest form. III. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY: A. PARCEL I.D. NUMBER: 37690040003 and 37690040100 B. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: PARCELI A PORTION OF TRACT "A" GOLDEN GATE ESTATES, UNIT 22, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 7, PAGE 83 AND 84, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGIN AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF TRACT "A" GOLDEN GATE ESTATES, UNIT 22, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 7, PAGES 83 AND 84, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID TRACT "A", NORTH 89030'02" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 1,366.01 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WESTERLY BOUNDARY OF THE LANDS DESCRIBED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 4079, PAGE 1361, PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, THE SAME BEING A POINT ON A NON TANGENTIAL CURVE TO THE RIGHT, THENCE ALONG SAID BOUNDARY, SOUTHWESTERLY 2,258.82 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE, HAVING A RADIUS OF 2,754.79 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 46058,49", (CHORD BEARING SOUTH 24049'44" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 2,196.07 FEET) TO A POINT ON THE BOUNDARY OF THE LANDS DESCRIBED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 4079, PAGE 1358, PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE ALONG SAID BOUNDARY FOR THE FOLLOWING TWO (2) COURSES AND DISTANCES, 1) NORTH 00029'58" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 361.77 FEET; 2) THENCE NORTH 89059'48" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 426.54 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WEST BOUNDARY OF THE AFOREMENTIONED TRACT "A"; THENCE ALONG SAID BOUNDARY, NORTH 00029,58" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 1,619.45 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 45.02 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. PARCEL 2 BEING A PORTION PARCEL 179 AS DESCRIBED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 4079, PAGE 1358 AND LYING WITHIN TRACT "A", GOLDEN GATE ESTATES, UNIT 22, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 7, PAGES 83 AND 84, BOTH OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCE AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF TRACT "A", GOLDEN GATE ESTATES, UNIT 22, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 7, PAGES 83 AND 84, PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID TRACT "A", SOUTH 00029'58" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 1,619.45 FEET TO A POINT ON THE BOUNDARY OF PARCEL 179 AS DESCRIBED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 4079, PAGE 1358, OF SAID PUBLIC RECORDS AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE PARCEL OF LAND HEREIN DESCRIBED; THENCE ALONG SAID BOUNDARY FOR THE FOLLOWING TWO (2) COURSES AND DISTANCES, !I SOUTH 89059'48" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 426.54 FEET; 2) THENCE SOUTH 00029,58" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 361.77 FEET TO A POINT ON A NON TANGENTIAL CURVE TO THE RIGHT; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY 526.09 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE, HAVING A RADIUS OF 2,754.79 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 10056'31", (CHORD BEARING SOUTH 53047'24" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 525.29 FEET) TO A POINT ON THE AFOREMENTIONED BOUNDARY OF SAID PARCEL 179, THE SAME BEING THE WEST LINE OF SAID TRACT "A", THENCE ALONG SAID BOUNDARY AND SAID WEST LINE, NORTH 00029'58" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 672.12 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 5.16 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. TOTAL CONTAINING 50.18 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. C. GENERAL LOCATION: Northeast quadrant of Immokalee road and 4th St NE. D. Section: 22 Township:48 Range: 27 E. PLANNING COMMUNITY: Rural Estates F. TAZ: G. SIZE IN ACRES: ZONING: E, Estates I. FUTURE LAND USE MAP DESIGNATION(S): Rural Golden Gate Estates, Estates Designation, Mixed Use District, Residential Estates Subdistrict J. SURROUNDING LAND USE PATTERN: Residential and Commercial - Exhibit V.A and V.B IV. TYPE OF REQUEST: A. GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN ELEMENT (S) TO BE AMENDED: Housing Element Traffic Circulation Sub -Element Aviation Sub -Element Sanitary Sewer Sub -Element Solid Waste Sub -Element Capital Improvement Element Future Land Use Element Immokalee Master Plan Recreation/Open Space Mass Transit Sub -Element Potable Water Sub -Element NGWAR Sub -Element Drainage Sub -Element CCME Element x Golden Gate Master Plan B. AMEND PAGE (S): iii, 1 and 16 OF THE: Golden Gate Area Master Plan, Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub -Element AS FOLLOWS: (Use Stroke -+" h-to identify language to be deleted; Use Underline to identify language to be added). Attach additional pages if necessary: See Exhibit IV.B C. AMEND FUTURE LAND USE MAP(S) DESIGNATION FROM Rural Golden Gate Estates, Estates Designation, Mixed Use District, Residential Estates Subdistrict TO Rural Golden Gate Estates, Estates Designation, Mixed Use District, Immokalee Road/4th Street N.E. Mixed Use Subdistrict. Exhibit IV.C. D. AMEND OTHER MAP(S) AND EXHIBITS AS FOLLOWS: (Name & Page #) N.A. E. DESCRIBE ADDITIONAL CHANGES REQUESTED: Create Immokalee Road and 4th St NE Mixed Use Subdistrict Inset Map. See Exhibit IV.E. V. REQUIRED INFORMATION: NOTE: ALL AERIALS MUST BE AT A SCALE OF NO SMALLER THAN I" = 400'. At least one copy reduced to 8- 1/2 x 1 1 shall be provided of all aerials and/or maps. A. LAND USE Exhibit V.A Provide general location map showing surrounding developments (PUD, DRI's, existing zoning) with subject property outlined. Exhibit V.A Provide most recent aerial of site showing subject boundaries, source, and date. Exhibit V.A Provide a map and summary table of existing land use and zoning within a radius of 300 feet from boundaries of subject property. 5 B. FUTURE LAND USE AND DESIGNATION Exhibit V.B Provide map of existing Future Land Use Designation(s) of subject property and adjacent lands, with acreage totals for each land use designation on the subject property. C. ENVIRONMENTAL Exhibit V.0 Provide most recent aerial and summary table of acreage of native habitats and soils occurring on site. HABITAT IDENTIFICATION MUST BE CONSISTENT WITH THE FDOT-FLORIDA LAND USE, COVER AND FORMS CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM (FLUCCS CODE). NOTE: THIS MAY BE INDICATED ON SAME AERIAL AS THE LAND USE AERIAL IN "A" ABOVE. Exhibit V.0 Provide a summary table of Federal (US Fish & Wildlife Service) and State (Florida Game & Freshwater Fish Commission) listed plant and animal species known to occur on the site and/or known to inhabit biological communities similar to the site (e.g. panther or black bear range, avian rookery, bird migratory route, etc.) Identify historic and/or archaeological sites on the subject property. D. GROWTH MANAGEMENT Reference , F.A.C. and Collier County's Capital Improvements Element Policy 1.1.2 (Copies attached). 1. INSERT "Y" FOR YES OR "N" FOR NO IN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING: N Is the proposed amendment located in an Area of Critical State Concern? (Reference F.A.C.). IF so, identify area located in ACSC. N Is the proposed amendment directly related to a proposed Development of Regional Impact pursuant to Chapter 380 F.S.? (Reference , F.A.C.) N/Y - Exhibit V.D Is the proposed amendment directly related to a proposed Small Scale Development Activity pursuant to Subsection 163.3187 (1) (c), F.S.? Does the proposed amendment create a significant impact in population which is defined as a potential increase in County -wide population by more than 5% of population projections? (Reference Capital Improvement Element Policy 1.1.2). If yes, indicate mitigation measures being proposed in conjunction with the proposed amendment. Y/Y - Exhibit V.D1 Does the proposed land use cause an increase in density and/or intensity to the uses permitted in a specific land use designation and district identified (commercial, industrial, etc.) or is the proposed land use a new land use designation or district? (Reference F.A.C.). If so, provide data and analysis to support the suitability of land for the proposed use, and of environmentally sensitive land, ground water and natural resources. (Reference , F.A.C.) E. PUBLIC FACILITIES Provide the existing Level of Service Standard (LOS) and document the impact the proposed change will have on the following public facilities: Exhibit V.E Potable Water Exhibit V.E Sanitary Sewer Exhibit V.E1 Arterial & Collector Roads, Name specific road and LOS Golden Gate Boulevard Wilson Boulevard Exhibit V.E Drainage Exhibit V.E Solid Waste Exhibit V.E Parks: Community and Regional If the proposed amendment involves an increase in residential density, or an increase in intensity for commercial and/or industrial development that would cause the LOS for public facilities to fall below the adopted LOS, indicate mitigation measures being proposed in conjunction with the proposed amendment. (Reference Capital Improvement Element Objective 1 and Policies) 2. Exhibit V.E2 Provide a map showing the location of existing services and public facilities that will serve the subject property (i.e. water, sewer, fire protection, police protection, schools and emergency medical services. 3. Exhibit V.E Document proposed services and public facilities, identify provider, and describe the effect the proposed change will have on schools, fire protection and emergency medical services. F. OTHER Identify the following areas relating to the subject property: Exhibit V.F Flood zone based on Flood Insurance Rate Map data (FIRM). Exhibit V.F Location of wellfields and cones of influence, if applicable. (Identified on Collier County Zoning Maps) N.A. Coastal High Hazard Area, if applicable N.A. High Noise Contours (65 LDN or higher) surrounding the Naples Airport, if applicable (identified on Collier County Zoning Maps). G. SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION Provided $16,700.00 non-refundable filing fee made payable to the Board of County Commissioners due at time of submittal. (Plus, proportionate share of advertising costs) $9,000.00 non-refundable filing fee for a Small -Scale Amendment made payable to the Board of County Commissioners due at time of submittal. (Plus, proportionate share of advertising costs) Exhibit V.G3 Proof of ownership (copy of deed) Exhibit V.G4 Notarized Letter of Authorization if Agent is not the Owner (See attached form) Exhibit V.G5 Addressing Checklist Exhibit V.G6 Preapplication Meeting Notes * If you have held a pre -application meeting within 9 months prior to submitted date and paid the pre -application fee of $500.00 at the meeting, deduct that amount from the above application fee amount when submitting your application. All pre -application fees are included in the total application submittal fee if petition submitted within 9 months of pre -application meeting date. Otherwise the overage will be applied to future proportionate share advertising costs. * Maps shall include: North arrow, name and location of principal roadways and shall be at a scale of 1 "=400' or at a scale as determined during the pre -application meeting. *All attachments should be consistently referenced as attachments or exhibits, and should be labelled to correlate to the application form, e.g. "Exhibit I.D." * Planning Community, TAZ map, Traffic Analysis Zone map, Zoning maps, and Future Land Use Maps. Some maps are available on the Zoning Division website depicting information herein: Zoning Services Section: Comprehensive Planning Section: THIS HAS CHANGED SINCE DCA BECAME DEO. SEE GMP PAEG 2011 UPDATES: https://www.colliercountyfl.gov/your-government/divisions-s-z/zoning division/zoning-services- section/land-use-commission-district-maps Immokalee Road/41h Street N.E. Mixed Use Subdistrict (PL20190002355) Exhibit 1.13 Professional Consultants Planning/Project Management: D. Wayne Arnold, AICP Q. Grady Minor and Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey Bonita Springs, FL 34134 239.947.1144 warnold@gradyminor.com Richard D. Yovanovich, Esq Coleman, Yovanovich and Koester, P.A. 4001 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 300 Naples, FL 34103 239.435.3535 ryovanovich@cyklawfirm.com Transportation: James M. Banks, P.E., President JMB Transportation Engineering, Inc. 4711 7th Avenue SW Naples, FL 34119 239.919.2767 jmbswte@msn.com Environmental: Marco Espinar, Environmental Planner Collier Environmental Consultants, Inc. 3880 Estey Ave. Naples, FL 34104 239-263-2687 marcoe@prodigy.net Market Analysis: Russ Weyer President Real Estate Econometrics, Inc. 707 Orchid Drive, Suite 100 Naples, FL 34102 239-269-1341 Rweyer@ree-i.com August25, 2020 w GradyiN inor RCIRP-19 Exhibit ID-rl.docx CEvll Engfnccrs • I.and 8vnc}vrs • I'lamicrs • Landscape, AFVhItCO-; Page 1 of 2 Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, FL 34134 • 239-947-1144 • engineering@gradyminor.com • www.gradyminor.com APPENDIX D. Wayne Arnold, AICP Principal, Director of Planning Education • Master of Urban Planning, University of Kansas, Lawrence • Bachelor of Science, Urban and Regional Planning/Geography, Missouri State University Professional Registrations/ Affiliations • American Institute of Certified Planners (AICP) • American Planning Association (APA) • Leadership Collier, Class of 2000 • Bonita Springs Chamber of Commerce Government Affairs Committee • Collier County Jr. Deputy League, Inc., Board of Directors President • City of Naples Planning Advisory Board 2010-2014 GradyMinor Mr. Arnold is a Principal and co-owner of the firm and serves as the Secretary/Treasurer and Director of Planning. As Director of Planning, Mr. Arnold is responsible for and oversees services related to plan amendments, property re -zonings, expert witness testimony, ROW Acquisition, public participation facilitation, and project management. Mr. Arnold previously served as the Planning Services Director at Collier County, where he oversaw the County's zoning, comprehensive planning, engineering, platting and Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) functions. Mr. Arnold also has prior Florida planning experience with Palm Beach County Government and the South Florida Water Management District. Mr. Arnold has been accepted as an expert in land planning matters in local and state proceedings. RELEVANT PROJECTS • Collier County Growth Management Plan • Immokalee Airport Master Plan • Collier County Land Development Code • Logan Boulevard Right -of -Way Acquisition Planning Analysis • U.S. 41 Right -of -Way Expansion Planning Analysis • Copeland Zoning Overlay • Collier County Government Center Development of Regional Impact (DRI) • Pine Ridge/Goodlette Road Commercial Infill District • Henderson Creek Planned Development/Growth Management Plan Amendment • Mercato Mixed Use Planned Development • Diamond Oaks Village • Imperial Landing MPD • Lely Area Stormwater Improvement Project ROW Analysis • Dean Street MPD • Bonita Exchange MPD • Collier County Public Schools Transportation Ancillary Plant Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. Civil Engineers • Surveyors • Land Planners • Landscape Architects Richard D. Yovanovich Rich Yovanovich is one of the firm's shareholders. He moved to Naples in 1990 and was an Assistant County Attorney for Collier County from 1990-1994. As an Assistant County Attorney he focused on land development and construction matters. Since entering private practice in 1994, Mr. Yovanovich has represented property owners through the entitlement process before local and state agencies. His representation includes project ranging from small residential and commercial projects to large developments of regional impact. Professional Activities/Associations The Florida Bar Collier County Bar Association Civic/Charitable Activities/Associations Member, Furman University Trustees Council, 2007 - Chairman, Leadership Collier Foundation Alumni Assoc. Member, Board of Directors, Holocaust Museum 2007 — Member, Leadership Collier, Class of 2000 Member, Board of Directors, CBIA (Director 2004-2008, Vice President 2006-2007) Member, Board of Director, Immokalee Friendship House Member, Board of Director, Avow Hospice 2011- Member, Florida Trend Legal Elite Elder, Vanderbilt Presbyterian Church Bar & Court Admission Florida, 1988 U.S District Court, Middle District of Florida U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit Education University of South Carolina J.D., 1987 J. Ed., 1986 Furman University B.A., cum laude, 1983 JMB Transportation Engineering, Inc. Key Personnel - James M. Banks, P.E., President JAMES M. BANKS, P.E., PRESIDENT Certifications & Positions Bachelor of Science Degree in Civil Engineering - University of Kentucky, 1986 Professional Engineer - State of Florida — Reg. No. 43860, 1991 to Present JMB Transportation Engineering, Inc., President/Owner — 2007 to Present _Q & E Overview Mr. Banks has been actively involved in the fields of traffic/transportation engineering and planning since 1987. During the past 30 years, he has developed a comprehensive knowledge within these disciplines and is regarded as an expert within his profession. Mr. Banks has represented a wide range of clientele in both the public and private sectors. Public sector clients include airport authorities & FAA, local and state municipalities, county commissions, public school boards, city councils, planning boards, and city/county attorneys. Private sector clients have been land planners, land use attorneys, right-of-way acquisition attorneys, engineers, surveyors, architects and developers. Corridor Planning Mr. Banks has conducted a significant number of roadway corridor studies for both the public and private sectors. His work efforts included developing a comprehensive and strategic corridor improvement plan to meet the long term transportation objectives for the area. By forecasting area - wide long range traffic demands, Mr. Banks developed transportation needs plans in order to ensure adequate roadway capacity. Example projects are Alico Road Six-Laning, Lee Boulevard Improvements, Southwest International Airport's Transportation Needs Plan, Bonita Beach Road Access Management Plan, and Fort Myers Beach - Time Square Traffic Circulation Study. Transportation Design Mr. Banks has been engineer of record on numerous transportation design projects; such as, complex intersection design, signalization, street lighting, maintenance of traffic plans, signing and pavement marking plans, vehicular accident analysis, major roadway improvement design, traffic calming plans, railroad crossing design, and access management plans. Projects include Colonial Boulevard Improvements, Immokalee Road Widening Project, Lee Boulevard Six-Laning, Bonita Beach Road and Alico Road Widening. Traffic Impact Statements & Site Access Studies Mr. Banks has prepared countless Traffic Impact Statements & Site Access Studies for privately funded, publicly funded and public utilities projects. Types of projects that he has worked on include JMB Transportation Engineering, Inc. fey Personnel - James M. Banks, P.E., President all size of commercial/medical/airport projects and every possible type and size residential and mixed -use developments, including projects that were deemed Developments of Regional Impact (DRI's). Governmental agencies have used reports that were prepared by Mr. Banks as "guidelines" that have been distributed to other professionals for their consideration when producing their work products. Mr. Banks has a earned reputation with the private sector of having the skills necessary to navigate through the permitting process with ease . Expert Witness Mr. Banks has provided expert witness testimony at numerous court proceedings and public hearings regarding traffic/transportation related matters. He has testified in various forums; such as, county commission meetings, hearing examiner reviews, courts of law, public workshops, port authority meetings, and peer review functions. Types of issues that Mr. Banks provided testimony for were right-of-way acquisition cases; zoning and land use amendments, land development projects, corridor studies, roadway improvement projects, transportation improvement projects, and airport construction projects. Selected Pro ei ct Experience Colonial Boulevard Improvements for Lee County DOT -Engineer of Record/Project Manager for the preparation of at -grade and interchange signalization plans, signing & pavement markings plans, street lighting and complex maintenance of traffic plans. Also, provided right-of-way acquisition services to the Lee County Attorney's office. SWFIA Expansion/Treeline Avenue Extension for FAA & Lee County Government - Engineer of Record for the Transportation Demand/Needs Study that was used as the basis for the ultimate design and construction. Prepared signalization plans and intersection geometry plans for complex intersections. Immokalee Road Improvements for Collier County DOT - Engineer of Record/Project Manager for the preparation of signalization, signing & pavement markings, street lighting plans. Alico Road Six Laning - Engineer of Record for the Corridor Study that was used as the basis for the ultimate design and construction. Prepared signalization plans, maintenance of traffic plans, railroad crossing, provided peer review/QC for road design plans. Lee Boulevard - Engineer of Record for the Corridor Study & Access Management Plan that was used as the basis for the ultimate design and construction. Prepared signalization plans, maintenance of traffic plans, and provided peer review/QC. State Road 80 - FDOT - Design Engineer for the widening and drainage improvements of S.R. 80 from I-75 to Buckingham Road, in Lee County. Marco A. Espinar 3211 681h St SW Naples, Fl 34105 RESUME EDUCATION Bilingual: English & Spanish Office: 239-263-2687 Home 239-263-2747 Cardinal Mooney High School Diploma 1980 Sarasota, Florida Manatee Junior College AA Degree 1982 Bradenton, Florida Biology University of South Florida BS Degree 1990 Tampa, Florida Biology Completed USF Cooperative Education Program April 1988 USF Undergraduate Research - USF 1985 Apalachicola Archaeological Expedition & Research - Lab Coordinator of Fauna Identification from Archeological Sites - Studies of Seagrass Beds (Thalassia testudinum) in Upper Tampa Bay, Florida - Growth Rates of Marine Algae (Gracilaria tikvahiae, G. verrucosa, G. deblis ) Port Manatee, Florida EMPLOYMENT HISTORY & EXPERIENCE Collier Environmental Consultants Inc. Owner & Environmental Planning / Naples, Florida 2/96 - Present Biologist Environmental Permitting, Planning Vegetation Inventory Mitigation & Monitoring Plans Threatened and Endangered Species Survey Licensed Agent Gopher Tortoise Permitting, Testing, Relocation Exotic Plant Removal / Poisoning Mitigation Plantings Jurisdictional Determination Environmental Impact Statements Red Cockaded Woodpecker Survey UMAM Analysis BP- Natural Resource Advisor - Deepwater Horizon MS Canyon 252 Oil Spill Gulfport, Mississippi - Dauphin Island, Alabama - Pensacola, Florida Turrell & Associates, Inc. Naples, Florida 2/94 - 12/95 Environmental Permitting, Planning Threatened and Endangered Species Survey Environmental Impact Statements Senior Environmental Planner Supervision of Staff Review Staff Reports South Florida Water Management District Environmental Analyst Fort Myers, Florida 2/93 - 8/93 Dredge & Fill Permit Review Surface Water Permit Review Collier County Government, Development Services Environmental Specialist II Naples, Florida 10/90 — 2/93 Site Development Plan Compliance Planned Unit Development Compliance Site Drainage Inspections Southwest Florida Water Management District Tampa, Florida 9/87 — 10/90 Landscape Inspections Environmental Enforcement Field Services Technician As -Built Inspections of Storm Water System - Engineering, Survey Surface and Ground Water Permit Compliance Well Construction & Abandonment Inspections Southwest Florida Water Management District (CO-OP) Environmental Scientists 1 Brooksville, Florida 1/86 - 9/87 Wetland Vegetation Studies At Major Well Fields Water Quality Sampling & Testing PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATIONS Southwest Florida Association of Environmental Professionals, Member Elected to very First Governing Board and served 2 terms, served on founding association — Bylaws Committee Appointed by the Board of County Commissioners and Served on the Collier County Environmental Advisory Board Appointed by the Board of County Commissioners and Currently Serving on the Development Services Advisory Committee Currently Serving on the Land Development Code Sub -Committee Appointed by the Board of County Commissioners and Served on Conservation Collier Land Acquisition Advisory Committee 6 years Served as Chairman of the Conservation Collier Lands Evaluation and Management Sub - Committee, Award for Ten (10) years of my Voluntary Service to Collier County By the Board of County Commissioners - January 2010 Awarded Outstanding Advisory Board Member Award - February 2009 by Collier County Board of County Commissioners Gopher Tortoise Management and Mitigation Professional Training Program Successful Completion 9/01 REFERENCES UPON REQUEST Curriculum Vitae George Russell Weyer President Real Estate Econometrics, Inc. 707 Orchid Drive Naples, FL 34102 (239) 269-1341 rweyer@ree-i.com Overview • Over 20 years of real estate development experience in Florida, Ohio and Nevada with large corporations and family -owned companies that focused on commercial office, retail, industrial, hospitality, amenity and large scale community and residential development. • Senior management experience with the entire development process from acquisition identification, due diligence, purchase negotiations, financing, planning and securing entitlements, horizontal and vertical construction, sales/leasing and marketing, to property management and condominium turnover and disposition. Skills also include land acquisition, land planning, entitlement process, financing proforma development, market analysis, land development, CDD management, financing and assessment determination, home and commercial construction, sales and Marketing management, builder selection and management, amenity design and management, residential and commercial property owners association management and design review committee management. • Experience with governmental entities on budgeting, financing and identifying and implementing economic development programs. • Full member of the Urban land Institute and the past chairman of ULI's Southwest Florida District Council. Expert Testimony • Mr. Weyer has testified as an expert in front of the following courts of law: o In the Circuit Court of the Fifth Judicial Circuit in and for Sumpter County, FL o Florida Department of Administrative Hearings o In the Circuit Court of the Twentieth Judicial Circuit Court in and for Collier County, FL o in the Circuit Court of the Twentieth Judicial Circuit Court in and for Lee County, FL o United States Bankruptcy Court, Middle District of Florida, Fort Myers Division o United States District Court, Middle District of Florida, Fort Myers Division • Mr. Weyer has testified as an expert in front of the following governmental jurisdictions: o City of Naples, Florida o Collier County, Florida o City of Bonita Springs, Florida o Hillsborough County, Florida o Lee County, Florida o City of Fort Myers, Florida o City of Cape Coral, Florida o City of North Port, Florida o City of Tamarac, Florida o Miami -Dade County, Florida o Community Redevelopment Agency, Fort Myers, Florida o Community Redevelopment Advisory Board, Naples, Florida • Mr. Weyer has testified as an expert for following bond validation hearings: o Ave Maria Stewardship Community District o Fronterra Community Development District o Hacienda Lakes Community Development District o Cypress Shadows Community Development District Professional Experience • President, Real Estate Econometrics, Inc., Naples, FL 2014-Present Real Estate Econometrics, Inc., a full -service consulting firm specializing in financial, economic and fiscal analysis and implementation for real estate projects, is well -versed in all aspects of the real estate/land development process from determining the market and land acquisition through planning and development and finally marketing and land disposition. Performing real estate valuation analysis, entitlement analysis (commercial need, affordable housing, fiscal impact), CDD formation and management, CDD methodology consultant, commercial POA management, fiscal impact analysis of real estate projects, large scale development market analysis, economic impact analysis, government assessment methodology development, litigation support analysis, public/private partnership coordination, tax increment financing. • Senior Associate, Fishkind & Associates, Inc., Naples, FL 2004-2014 Real estate valuation analysis, entitlement analysis (commercial need, affordable housing, fiscal impact), CDD formation and management, CDD methodology consultant, commercial POA management, fiscal impact analysis of real estate projects, large scale development market analysis, economic impact analysis, government assessment methodology development, litigation support analysis, Cape Canaveral economic and fiscal impact, annexation analysis, impact fee analysis, public/private partnership coordination, tax increment financing. • V.P. Development, JED of Southwest Florida, Inc. Naples, FL 2003-2004 Office complex design, construction and management, neighborhood retail complex design, construction and management, entitlement process management. • President, GRW Management, Inc., Naples, FL 2001-2003 Market and entitlement analysis • President, London Bay Homes, Inc. subsidiary, Romanza, Inc. Naples, FL 2000-2001 Managed two offices of an interior design company. Turn around into profitable entity. • V.P. Resort Operations, Lake Las Vegas Joint Venture, Las Vegas NV 1999-2000 Managed all commercial operations on site — 2 hotels, small retail center, two casinos, private community club, lake/marina operations, managed public and private golf course operations, designed and constructed third public golf course and clubhouse, community liaison for development company, design review committee chair, property owners association chair. • President & CEO, Cavalear Corporation, Toledo, OH 1997-1999 Management of 3 master planned communities — one with lake and two with golf courses, development and construction management of 2 residential villa neighborhoods, unit construction for two villa developments, single family unit construction • Director of Commercial Sales, Amenity Management & Marketing, Westinghouse Communities, Inc. Naples/Fort Myers, FL 1983-1997 Amenity manager, managed public and private golf courses, builder program manager, builder sales manager, model row development, marketing manager for two large scale master planned communities — Pelican Bay and Gateway, started and managed Pelican Landing and Pelican Marsh marketing departments. Education University of Miami, Miami, FL MBA 1993 Michigan State University, Bachelor of Arts, Communications, 1977 Immokalee Road/4th Street N.E. Mixed Use Subdistrict (PL20190002355) Exhibit IV.0 Proposed Future Lana use iviap Cn IMMOKALEE RD SUBJECT PROPERTY z N O 7 W OIL WELL RD (D J ■ m F RANDALL BLVD IMMOKALEE RD z z0 m m O 3 0 w H _— ❑ I VAND RBILT — BEA H GOLDEN GATE BLVDGOLDEN GATE BLVD PINE R GE RD ❑ ❑ GREEN BLVD m O) O m a N W m z W W G. PKWY m RADI RD INTERSTATE 75 INTERSTATE 75 r DAVIS BLVD m S.R. 84 z ° n � rn m � K z O ti 0 U U) RATTLES AKE H MMOCK RD H RURAL GOLDEN GATE FUTURE LAND USE MAP DOPTED - SEPTEMBER 26, 2919 m K V) O U N H O 0 0.5 1 2 3 Miles R26E R27E � R28E R29E IMMOKALEE ROAD/4TH STREET N.E. MIXED USE SUBDISTRICT (PL20190002355) EXHIBIT IV.D - PROPOSED MAP REVISION IMMOKALEE ROAD/RANDALL BLVD PLANNING STUDY AREA Ocean Bluff CT LEGEND NW IMMOKALEE RD/RANDALL BLVD PLANNING STUDY AREA RESIDENTIAL ESTATES SUBDISTRICT N RANDALL BLVD COMMERCIAL SUBDISTRICT RURAL SETTLEMENT AREA SUBDISTRICT - IMMOKALEE ROAD/4TH STREET N.E. MIXED USE SUBDISTRICT 0 500 000 2,000 3,000 j Feet PREPAREDBEYANG, - • OIL WELL RD GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT FILE: Imm Rantlal Srutly Area mxtl ■ DATE: 19/2919 ■ ■ ' O a - o ee Uj o O J W m z Z un.n.3 ■ z F- Z ~ - cl) U) O � ; -0 J N � • N — C ••, 25th AVE NE � y `U� i �— IMMOK LEE owj i RANDALL BLVD' i 0 - m - 24th AVE N'E� z O J>_ ADOPTED -SEPTEMBER24,2019 (Ord. No. 2019-26) EXHIBIT IV.E VVOKAEEE ROAD/4TH STREET N.E. MIXED USE SUBDISTRICT Collier County, Florida ADOPTED (Ord. No. — ??, 20_— 20_--??) 0 112 MI. 1 MI LEGEND GOLDEN GATE ESTATES SETTLEMENT AREA -IMMOKALEE ROAD/4TH STREET N.E. MIXED USE SUBDISTRICT PREPARED BY: GRAPHICS AND TECHNICAL SUPPORT SECTION COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DIVISION FILE: ???????? DATE: ??/?? 300 FOOT RADIUS ZONED: E USE: UNDEVELOPED SUBJECT PROPERTY 50.18+/- ACRES qV ly"tl: ., //JJ ZONED: } N ORANGE TREE BOULEVARD a r- m a - v _ ZONED: I" ORANGETREE MPUD USE: UNDEVELOPED ZONED: �ORANGETREE MPUD . USE: RESIDENTIAL}� m C 1` ORANGETREE MPUD '. -�.r, `+, ': � r 4. ljjc�I1:F.-+ USE: COMMERCIAL ALI $` �+ RANDALL BOULEVARDa IN a - a SUBJECT PROPERTY - 50.18t ACRES N EXISTING FLUE: RURAL GOLDEN GATE ESTATES, ESTATES DESIGNATION, MIXED USE DISTRICT, RESIDENTIAL ESTATES SUBDISTRICT EXISTING ZONING: E, ESTATES ADJACENT PROPERTY ZONING LAND USE NORTH E UNDEVELOPED EAST MPUD (ORANGE TREE) ROW, RESIDENTIAL, COMMERCIAL, UNDEVELOPED 0 200' 400' c SOUTH MPUD (ORANGE TREE) ROW, COMMERCIAL SCALE: 1 = 400' WEST E RESIDENTIAL WHEN PLOTTED @ 8.5" X 11" : IMMOKALEE ROAD14TH STREET N.E. SCAE: xx - aGradyMinor Grady Alluor m,d F.A. on cone I16ph , �.,11,. Roy Ronlla springs. FWr.da 31131 VIXED USE SUBDISTRICT na•re: EXHIBIT V.A. — LAND USE Civil Engineers . Land Surveyors . Planners . Landscape Architects „� xn E: Cert. oFAdh. EB 0005151 Cert. oFAdh. LB 0005151 Brain— LC 26000266 RCIRP-19 xu BonitaSpHrip, 239.947.1144 awa. G'radyd/inor. rom Fort Myer6: 239.690.4380 SOURCE' COLLIER COUNTY PROPERTY APPRAISER' FLOWN: 12/2019 SHEET#OF vn# Ic Immokalee Road/4th Street N.E. Mixed Use Subdistrict (PL20190002355) Exhibit V.B Future Land Use and Designation ESTATES DESIGNATION AGRICULTURAL/ RURAL DESIGNATI111 ON STRICT ® arai s.obmamare. w,.a o R„d,m�,�E,�„=u�a�� OVERLAYS AND SPECIAL FEATURES RURAL GOLDEN GATE ESTATES o ��h-- ���,.su°a,� FUTURE LAND USE MAP r V IIIIII� snare. smog yce waumisnn IMMDKALEE RD r z SITE m ESTATES DESIGNATION, MIXED USE w DISTRICT, RESIDENTIAL ESTATES g SUBDISTRICT = 50.18t ACRES w OIL WELL RD v �-ND-L r IMMOKALEE RD o o _ w O 3 0 m ❑ VAND RBILT VANDERBILT H z BEACH RD w !1 ❑ — ^� GOLDEN GATE BLVD GOLDEN GATE BLVD 1 a 1 (7 K O Lj PINE R GE RD co It GREEN BLVD > m CD O w z ❑ o o m w m > ❑ w G. PKWV m RADIO RD INTERSTATE 75 INTERSTATE 75 F z y DAVIS BLVD ❑ S.R. 84 m w a w O z O co U RATTLES AKE H MOCK RD F- F— F RURAL GOLDEN GATE FUTURE LAND USE MAP — DOPTED- SEPTEMBER 11, 1111 / o J W U7 o U N F O 0 0.5 1 2 3 Miles R26E R27E R28E R29E 3.08.00 Environmental Data Purpose As per requirements in LDC Sections 3.08.00 and questions in the CU Checklist Preparation of Environmental Data Preparation of Environmental Data, Environmental Data Submittal Requirement shall be prepared by an individual with academic credentials and experience in the area of environmental science or natural resource management. Academic credentials and experience shall be a bachelor's or higher degree in one of the biological sciences with at least two years of ecological or biological professional experience in the State of Florida Qualifications of Environmental Consultant Collier Environmental Consultants Inc. 2/96 - Present 3211 68t' Street SW Naples, Florida 34105 Marco A. Espinar- Biologist Environmental Data. The following shall be submitted where applicable to evaluate projects. A) Wetlands i) Identify on Current Aerial / the location of all Collier County / SFWMD Jurisdictional wetlands according to the Florida Land Use Cover and Forms Classification System FLUCFCS A FLUCFCS map and vegetation inventory has been included. The site consists of approximately 50.18 acres. Located in Section 22, Township 48, Range 27. It is found on the west side of Immokalee Road and east of 4t' Street Northeast in Golden Gate Estates. The parcel is almost entirely vegetated. There is a cleared and maintained 5± acres parcel at its southern boundary, which is utilized for stormwater management by Collier County. The vegetated parcel is primarily dominated with Slash pine, cypress and cabbage palms with a moderate midstory of Brazilian pepper and other exotics. The primary habitat is that of 4109 Slash Pine, Cypress Cabbage Palm - Disturbed (1994 acres). There are also some areas with palmetto. Habitat 411D Slash pine - Disturbed (11.58 acres) consists of a Slash pine canopy with palmetto understory. The site is densely vegetated. This parcel has been altered by the disruption of hydrology and the lack of a fire regime. The parcel is surrounded with either homes or roadway. An exhibit depicting each FLUCCS Code with acreage has been provided B) Listed Species and Bald Eagle Nests and Nest Protection Zones i) Provide a wildlife survey for the nests of bald eagle and for listed species known to inhabit biological communities similar to those existing on site. The survey shall be conducted in accordance with the guidelines or recommendations of the FFWCC and the USFWS. Survey times may be reduced or waived where an initial habitat assessment by the environmental consultant indicates that the likelihood of listed species occurrence is low as determined by the FFWCC and USFWS. Where an initial habitat assessment by the environmental consultant indicates that the likelihood of listed species occurrence is low, the survey time may be reduced or waived by the County Manager or designee. Wildlife Listed Species Study (LDC 10.02.3.A.2.m) A brief examination of the parcel found no listed animals on site. However, Fox squirrels are suspected. Four (4) leaf nests were observed on site. An exhibit showing the location of these nest has been provided in the listed species survey. The site does provide some functional habitat for small, medium mammals and birds. A listed species study was conducted and attached. This project site is in secondary panther zone. During the Environmental Resource Permit process this project will be reviewed by the appropriate regulatory agencies. ii) Provide Listed Plants identified in LDC Section 3.04.03 See Attached Vegetation List / FLUCCS Code Map iii) Wildlife Management Plans in accordance with LDC Section 3.04.00 See Attached Listed Species Study, Black bear and fox squirrel wildlife management plans may be required at the time of SDP. C) Native Vegetation Preservation i) For Sites or Portions of Sites Cleared of Native Vegetation or in Agricultural Use: Not Applicable ii) Identify on a current aerial the acreage, location and community types of all upland and wetland habitats on the project site, according to the FLUCFCS system and provide a legend foe each of the FLUCFS codes identified. Aerials and overlay information must be legible at the scale provided. Provide calculations for the acreage of native vegetation required to be retained on site. Include the above referenced calculations and aerials on the SDP or PPL. In a separate report, demonstrate how the preserve criteria pursuant to LDC section 3.05.07 have been meet. Location Maps / Aerials (LDC10.02.3.A.2.m) Aerials and location maps have been provided. The site consists of approximately 50.18 acres. Located in Section 22, Township 48, Range 27. It is found on the west side of Immokalee Road and east of 4�h Street Northeast in Golden Gate Estates. The parcel is almost entirely vegetated. There is a cleared and maintained parcel at its southern boundary, which is utilized for water management by Collier County. The vegetated parcel is primarily dominated with Slash pine, cypress and cabbage palms with a moderate midstory of Brazilian pepper and other exotics. The primary habitat is that of 4109 Slash Pine Cypress cabbage palm - Disturbed (19.94 acres). There are also some areas with palmetto. Habitat 411 D Slash pine- Disturbed (11.58 acres) consists of a Slash pine canopy with palmetto understory. An exhibit depicting each FLUCCS Code with acreage has been provided. See Attached Location Maps, Vegetation Maps / FLUCCS Maps Native Vegetation Calculation (LDC3.05.07.A.) 3.05.07 Preservation Standards This site consists of approximately 50.18 acres. Approximately 43.9 acres are native vegetation. The project will preserve 15 % and /or approximately 6.6 acres, consistent with the requirement of the Immokalee Road / 4t' Street NE subdistrict of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan. This will be consistent with Goal 6 of Collier County GMP's Objective 6.1 Protect native communities through the application of minimum preservation requirements. Clearly identify the location of all preserves The preserve area has been identified on the site plan. Soil Ground Water Sampling Natural Site An exhibit showing Collier county well field protection zones has been provided. Marco A. Espinar 3211 681h St SW Naples, Fl 34105 RESUME EDUCATION Bilingual: English & Spanish Office: 239-263-2687 Home 239-263-2747 Cardinal Mooney High School Diploma 1980 Sarasota, Florida Manatee Junior College AA Degree 1982 Bradenton, Florida Biology University of South Florida BS Degree 1990 Tampa, Florida Biology Completed USF Cooperative Education Program April 1988 USF Undergraduate Research - USF 1985 Apalachicola Archaeological Expedition & Research - Lab Coordinator of Fauna Identification from Archeological Sites - Studies of Seagrass Beds (Thalassia testudinum) in Upper Tampa Bay, Florida - Growth Rates of Marine Algae ( Gracilaria tikvahiae, G. verrucosa, G. deblis ) Port Manatee, Florida EMPLOYMENT HISTORY & EXPERIENCE Collier Environmental Consultants Inc. Owner & Environmental Planning / Naples, Florida 2/96 - Present Biologist Environmental Permitting, Planning Vegetation Inventory Mitigation & Monitoring Plans Threatened and Endangered Species Survey Licensed Agent Gopher Tortoise Permitting, Testing, Relocation. BP- Natural Resource Advisor - Exotic Plant Removal / Poisoning Mitigation Plantings Jurisdictional Determination Environmental Impact Statements Red Cockaded Woodpecker Survey UMAM Analysis Deepwater Horizon MS Canyon 252 Oil Spill Gulfport, Mississippi - Dauphin Island, Alabama - Pensacola, Florida _Turrell & Associates, Inc. Naples, Florida 2/94 - 12/95 Environmental Permitting, Planning Threatened and Endangered Species Survey Environmental Impact Statements Senior Environmental Planner Supervision of Staff Review Staff Reports South Florida Water Management District Environmental Analyst Fort Myers, Florida 2/93 - 8/93 Dredge & Fill Permit Review Surface Water Permit Review Collier County Government Development Services Environmental Specialist II Naples, Florida 10/90 — 2/93 Site Development Plan Compliance Planned Unit Development Compliance Site Drainage Inspections Southwest Florida Water Management District Tampa, Florida 9/87 — 10/90 Landscape Inspections Environmental Enforcement Field Services Technician As -Built Inspections of Storm Water System - Engineering, Survey Surface and Ground Water Permit Compliance Well Construction & Abandonment Inspections Southwest Florida Water Management District (CO-OP) Environmental Scientists 1 Brooksville, Florida 1/86 - 9/87 Wetland Vegetation Studies At Major Well Fields Water Quality Sampling & Testing PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATIONS Southwest Florida Association of Environmental Professionals, Member Elected to very first Governing Board and served 2 terms, served on founding association — Bylaws Committee Appointed by the Board of County Commissioners and Served on the Collier County Environmental Advisory Board Appointed by the Board of County Commissioners and Currently Serving on the Development Services Advisory Committee Currently Serving on the Land Development Code Sub -Committee Appointed by the Board of County Commissioners and Served on Conservation Collier Land Acquisition Advisory Committee 6 years Served as Chairman of the Conservation Collier Lands Evaluation and Management Sub - Committee, Award for Ten (10) years of my Voluntary Service to Collier County By the Board of County Commissioners - January 2010 Awarded Outstanding Advisory Member Award - February 2009 by Collier County Board of County Commissioners Gopher Tortoise Management and Mitigation Professional Training Program Successful Completion 9/01 REFERENCES UPON REQUEST VEGETATION INVENTORY FLUCCS CODE AND VEGETATION INVENTORY FLUCCS CODE (Description) Common Name Scientific Name Indicator Status 310 Dry Herbaceous 9.64 acres Uplands This area is located along the western boundary of the subject parcel. This area has scattered Slash pines with an open midstory and ground cover. The following plants were identified in this area. Slash pine Pinus elliotti UPL Cp,O Palmetto Serona repens FACU 6,0 Goldenaster Pityopsis graminifolia UPL G,C Ground lichen Cladina subtenus G,O Grape vine Vitis rotundifolia FAC G,D Poison ivy Toxicodendron radians FAC G,O Smilax Smilax spp. FAC G,C Broom sedge Andropogon virginicus FAC- G,O Caesar weed Urena lobata FACU G,C 321 Palmetto 0.63 acres Uplands This area consists of a sparse Slash pine canopy with a palmetto understory. The area would be considered upland. The area is vegetated with a variety of species. The following species were identified within this habitat. Slash pine Pinus elliotti UPL Cp,D Cabbage palm Sabal palmetto FAC M,C Dahoon holly Ilex cassine OBL M,O Palmetto Serona repens FACU G,C Melaleuca Melaleuca quinquenervia Exotic Cp,D Brazilian pepper Schinus terebinthifolius Exotic M,D Winged Sumac Rhus copallina UPL M,O Myrsine Myrsine floridana FAC M,C Penny royal Piloblephis rigida UPL G,O fetterbush Lyonia lucida FACW M,O Gallberry Ilex glabra FACW M,C buckthorn Bumelia reclinata FAC M,O Florida tema Trema spp. FAC M,O Dewberries Rubus spp. FAC G,C Broom sedge Andropogon virginicus FAC G,O Beggers ticks Bidens alba FACW G,O Ragweed Ambrosia artemissiifolia FACU G,C Grape vine Vitis rotundifolia FAC G,D Poison ivy Toxicodendron radians FAC G,O Smilax Smilax spp. FAC G,C snowberry Chiococca parvifolia UPL G,O 4109 Slash Pine, Cypress, Cabbage Palm - Disturbed 19.94 acres Upland El- Exotics 0 — 25% This is one of the largest habitats on site. This habitat starts along the northern boundary and extends all the way south. This habitat is a mixture of vegetation. The site has a Slash pine canopy with scattered cypress, cabbage palms, and laurel oaks. The midstory is dominated with Brazilian pepper and myrsine. This area has suffered from a disruption of hydrology and a fire regime. The following plants species were identified in this habitat. Slash pine Pinus elliotti UPL Cp,D Cabbage palm Sabal palmetto FAC M,C Cypress Taxodium spp. OBL Cp,C palmetto Serona repens FACU G,O Laurel oak Quercus laurifolia FACW Cp,O Myrsine Myrsine floridana FAC M,C Caesar weed Urena lobata FACU G,C Ear leaf acacia Acacia auriculiformis Exotic Cp,M,O carrotwood Cupaniopsis anacardioides Exotic M,O Penny royal Piloblephis rigida UPL G,O Chocolate weed Melochia corchorifolia FAC G,C Pipewort Lachnocaulon anceps FACW G,C Yellow -eyed grass Xyris elliottii OBL G,C Grape vine Vitis rotundifolia FAC G,D Poison ivy Toxicodendron radians FAC G,O Smilax Smilax spp. FAC G,C 411D Slash Pine —Disturbed 11.58 acres Upland El- Exotics 0 -25 % The area has a dense carpet of Grape vine. This area would be considered upland. There are two general areas where this habitat is located. The denser one is located along hnmokalee Road to the east. Then this habitat is located along its western boundary 4th Street NE. This habitat is a Slash pine dominated canopy with palmetto understory. Lack of fire has made the western portion almost impenetrable. The following species were identified in this habitat. Slash pine Pinus elliotti UPL Cp,D Palmetto Serona repens FACU G,C Cabbage palm Sabal palmetto FAC M,C Brazilian pepper Schinus terebinthifolius Exotic M,D Winged Sumac Aus copallina UPL M,0 Myrsine Myrsine floridana FAC M,C Grape vine Vitis rotundifolia FAC G,D Poison ivy Toxicodendron radians FAC G,0 Smilax Smilax spp. FAC G,C bracken fern Pteridium aquilinum FACU G,0 Sweet bay Magnolia virginiana FACW M,O Buckthorn Bumelia reclinata FAC M,0 fetterbush Lyonia lucida FACW M,0 Gallberry Ilex glabra FACW M,C Rabbit tobacco Pseudognaphalium obtusifolium UPL G,O 514 Ditch 0.36 acres Other Surface Waters This is a drainage ditch that traverse along the northern end of the subject parcel. This ditch begins by Immokalee Road and extends past our property line. Cattails Typha spp OBL G,0 Maidencane Panicum hemitomo OBL G,C Blue Maidencane Amphicarpum muhlenbergianum FACW G,O Torpedo grass Panicum repens FACW G,O 624 D Slash Pine, Cypress, Cabbage palm - Disturbed 1.56 acres Upland E1— Exotics 0 — 25% This is one of the largest natural habitats within this project. The species composition consists of both wetland and upland plant species. The area does not meet the criteria as Jurisdictional wetlands. Hydrological indicators are inconsistent due to hydrological alteration of the area. Soil samples showed sandy soils. The canopy consists primarily of cypress with some Slash pines. The midstory and ground cover consists of both wetland and upland plants neither gaining dominance. Slash pine Cabbage palm Cypress palmetto Laurel oak Ear leaf acacia Strangler fig carrotwood Myrsine Beauty bush Snowberry Dahoon holly Pinus elliotti UPL Cp,C Sabal palmetto FAC M,C Taxodium spp. OBL Cp,C Serona repens FACU 6,0 Quercus laurifolia FACW Cp,O Acacia auriculiformis Exotic Cp,M,C Ficus aurea FAC M,O Cupaniopsis anacardioides Exotic M,C Myrsine floridana FAC M,C I G,C Callicarpa Americana UPL M,O Chiococca alba UPL GC Ilex cassine OBL M,O Red maple Acer rubrum FAC M,O Cocoplurn Chrysobalanus icaco FACW M,O Swamp fern Blechnum serrulatum FACW+ G,O Chain fern Woodwardia virginica OBL G,O Brazilian pepper Schinus terebinthifolius Exotic M,C wax myrtle Myrica cerifera FAC+ M,O Melaleuca Melaleuca quinquenervia Exotic Cp,O Broom sedge Andropogon virginicus FAC- G,O Caesar weed Urena lobata FACU G,O Virginia creeper Ampelopsis quinquefolia FAC GO Cat -briar Smilax spp. FAC G,C Poison ivy Toxicodendron radicans FAC G,O Grape vine Vitis rotundifolia FAC G,D Whitehead broom Spermacoce verticillata FAC G,C paspalurn Paspalum monostachyum OBL G,O Florida Trema Trema spp. FAC M,O Chocolate weed Melochia corchorifolia FAC G,C 740 Disturbed 4.71 acres Upland This is a cleared field. This area is maintained. Bahiagrass Paspalum notatum FACU G,D 742 Borrow Area 0.19 acres Other Surface Waters This area had some fill excavated. As such, it is below natural grade and vegetated with pioneer plant species. The following plants were identified in this habitat. Brazilian pepper Schinus terebinthifolius Exotic M,C Laurel oak Quercus laurifolia FACW Cp,O Carolina willow Salix caroliniana OBL M,C wax myrtle Myrica cerifera FAC+ M,O Torpedo grass Panicum repens FACW G,O Broom sedge Andropogon virginicus FAG G,O 8144 Roads and Highway - Immokalee Road 1.57 acres ABREVIATIONS — Canopy (Cp), Midstory (M), Ground Cover (G) Dominant (D), Common (C), Occasional (0) INDICATOR STATUS - Obligate (OBL), Facultative wet plants (FACW), Facultative plants (FAC), Upland (UPL) IE i h tic Plants Wild Pines Stiff - leaved Recurved wired -leaved Shoestring ferza Golden polypody Tillandsia fasiculata FDA/C T. balbisiana FDA/T T. setacea FDA/T Vittaria lineata Polypodium sp. 524D _A_J "-,41 514 w zl W � � Iti ti a� 742 740 I � ' / / O09 1100, O 1� p �_ , FLUCCS HABITAT ACREAGE 310 DRY ,-�ERBACEQUS 9.64 321 PALMETTO 0.63 411D (E1) PINE FLATWOODS (DISTURBED) 11.58 E1 (EXOTICS 0 — 25%) 514 DITCH 0.35 624D (E1) `EVE, CYPRESS, CABBAGE PALM (DISTURBED) 1.56 740 DISTURBED LANDS 4.71 742 BORROW AREA 0.19 4109 E1 SLASH PINE, CYPRESS, CABBAGE PALM ( ) (DISTURBED) 19.94 8144 ROAD 1.57 TOTAL 5D.18 e N n 0 200' 400' SCALE-. 1" = 400' WHrN PLQYi 098S"X 11" iZAIVDALL CURVE MPUD Gra dyMinor 0. Credy h7inor anJ hayucr4Im P.A. =�oo'v aaxi +� COUS :fnlffl �,s,�rf Rey nw,i a sprr�gs, r�vroae sake FV-i5 FL UCFCS MAP M7& CiN1 Engillceln t.,Wld Surveyors MaRWN'' reie."l—h. Landscape Architects easmasl3l [.eranfAuu,. crt OnuAi�p� ➢onir<x 5pringv.- 2,7a..947.1144 xu,n..�,aa/ye/;qp�. rnm >3++NO lr2d"2Sr, SOURCE: port h4Ye COLLIER COUNTY PROPERTY APPRAISER, Aral IPIR G YU - ° 239&4d.4S. FLOWN. JAN 2020 nim F 81mv I OF I SOILS COLLIER COUNTY SOIL -LEGEND REVI P—D 1J.90 H_ YAMATAXI TMRTC : x 2 3 HOLOPAW FS, LIMESTONE SUBSTRATUM MALABAR H I FS. CHOBEE r LIMESTONE SIMSTRATT]M ANC} DANSA MUCKS DEPRESSIQNAL H 6 7 RIVIEiA., -LIMESTONE SUBSTRATUM-C4PELAND FS 2MMOKALEE 8 FS MYAB-_KA FS 10 11 OLDSMAR FS, LIMESTONE sUBSTRATUM HALLANDALE H 14 15 FS PINEDA FS, LIMESTONE SUBSTRATUM POMELLO H 6 FS oLDSMAR FS H 17 BASINGER FS 18 - 2 0 RIVIERA FS, LIMESTONE SUBSTRATUM FT. DRUM- 21 AND MALp�BAR=-HIGH•. FS BOCA FS H H H 23 23 WINDER AND GATOR-SOILS, DEPRESSIOyAL HOLOPAW HOLOPAW AND OKEELANTA 25 SOILS DEPRESSIONAL B©fir RNIERA , LIMESTONECOP-BLAND SIIBSTRAT } H 2 FS DEPRESSIONAL HOLOPAW FS 28 29 PINEDA AND RIVIERA FS WABASSO FS H 31 HILOLO LIMESTONE SUBSTRA MARGATE` � SOILS TUM, JUPIT _a AIvD 32 URBAN LAND 33 34 URBAN LAND HOLOPAW BASINGER COMPLEX URBAN LAND IMMOKALEE OLDSMAR LIMESTONE SORSTRATUM COMPLEX 35 36 URBAN _r-21ND AQUENTS COMPLEX ORGANIC SUBSTRATUM UDORTHENTS SHAPED 37 TUSCAWILLA F.9 38 URBAN LAND MATLACHA LIMESTONE sZMSTRATUM BOLA COMPLEX H 39 SATELLITE FS Qa -41 DURBIN AND WULFERT MUCKS 42 URBAN LAND SATELLITE COMPLEX CAI�jVERAL H ..- 43 HEAL --HMS ASSOCIATION WINDER fR V2ERAf 1;IMESTONE SUBS TRA Al CHOBEE SOILS DEPRESSionz.L H 45 48 PAOL 3 FS (1-8 percent slopes) ENNSUCCO SOIL (marl H 49 5 0 p�a_j�jej HALLANDALE AND :BOC'A FS {slt7ug3�} ` �OCHOPEE H 51 FSL, PRAIRIE (mar } OCHOPEE FSL x .. u 52 xESsaN MUCK FgE QUMqTLY FLOORED ES`Z`ERO AND H 34 pECKISH SOILS FREQUENTLY -FL Jtm R.BoCA COMPLEX H 56 BASINGER FS, OCCASjflLZLLY,FLOODED . IMPACTS PROPOSED ZONED: E, ESTATES USE: RESIDENTIAL ZONED: E, ESTATES ZONED: E, ESTATES USE:UNDEVELOPED USE: UNDEVELOPED RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL (PROPOSED CPUD, PL20200000546) INTERCONNECTION w w W w W w W 'PRESERVE w W 10' WIDE TYPE I I w w 'A' LANDSCAPE W W BUFFER(SEE II I W MINIMUM 6-FOOT WIDE F NOTE #3) w w LANDSCAPE BUFFER RESERVATION -� (SEE NOTE #2) I' ZONED:ORANGETREE PUD USE:UNDEVELOPED 1 COMMERCIAL F j F / 20' WIDE TYPE y 'D' LANDSCAPE �LU BUFFER y w AMENITY AREA W (GENERAL w LOCATION / I w / R ZONED: ORANGETREE PUD ❑il I // �AA��IT / USE: RESIDENTIAL "� ZONED: E, ESTATES USE: RESIDENTIAL W 20' WIDE TYPE III / / LEGEND 'D' LANDSCAPE / 20' WIDE TYPE BUFFER 'D'LANDSCAPE BUFFER ® DEVIATION R RESIDENTIAL C COMMERCIAL 3 -- ---- ---- -----� — // 5 o II ZONED: E, ESTATES USE:UNDEVELOPED / O� RESIDENTIAL N / - ZONED: ORANGETREE PUD I / USE: COMMERCIAL I/ 0 150' 300' o SCALE: 1" = 300' Q. Grady Miner and U-1ales. P.A. GradyMinor '1800 V1a Drl Roy Ronlla Springs. Plorlda 34131 Civil Engineers . Land Surveyors . Planners . Landscape Architects Cert. oFAdh. EB 0005151 Cert. oFAdh. LB 0005151 Business LC 26000266 Bonita Springs: 239.947.1144 a— Grady111nor. com Fort Myers: 239.690.4380 RANDALL CURVE MFUD EXHIBIT C VASTER PLAN REVISED: AUGUST 25, 2020 WHEN PLOTTED @ 8.5" X 1 V — SCALE: d SOB CODE Oe - n RP AME: C SHEET 1 OF 2 l, SITE SUMMARY TOTAL SITE AREA: 50.18± ACRE COMMERCIAL (C) 16.7± AC (33%) RESIDENTIAL (R) 20.8± AC (42%) 4TH STREET N.E. ROW 1.57± AC (3%) WATER MANAGEMENT 2.8± AC (6%) LANDSCAPE BUFFERS 1.71-±AC (3%) PRESERVE 6.6± AC (13%) RESIDENTIAL: MAXIMUM 400 DWELLING UNITS COMMERCIAL: MAXIMUM 150,000 S.F. OPEN SPACE: REQUIRED: 30% PROVIDED: 30% IwVa4Xgw REQUIRED: 6.6 ACRES (43.9± ACRES NATIVE VEGETATION X 0.15) PROVIDED: 6.6 ACRES DEVIATIONS (SEE EXHIBIT E 1Q LDC SECTION 5.05.04.D.1, "GROUP HOUSING" 2❑ LDC SECTION 5.05.05_D.2.A, "FACILITIES WITH FUEL PUMPS" G LDC SECTION 5.05.05.D.2.B, "FACILITIES WITH FUEL PUMPS', L41 LDC SECTION 5.05.05.B.1, "TABLE OF SITE DESIGN REQUIREMENTS" NOTES 1. THIS PLAN IS CONCEPTUAL IN NATURE AND IS SUBJECT TO MINOR MODIFICATION DUE TO AGENCY PERMITTING REQUIREMENTS. 2. PRESERVES MAY BE USED TO SATISFY THE LANDSCAPE BUFFER REQUIREMENTS AFTER EXOTIC VEGETATION REMOVAL IN ACCORDANCE WITH LDC SECTIONS 4.06.02 AND 4.06.05.E.1. SUPPLEMENTAL PLANTINGS WITH NATIVE PLANT MATERIALS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH LDC SECTION 3.05.07. IN ORDER TO MEET THE LDC REQUIREMENTS FOR A TYPE'B' BUFFER A 6 FOOT WIDE LANDSCAPE BUFFER RESERVATION HAS BEEN IDENTIFIED ON THE MASTER PLAN. IN THE EVENT THAT THE PRESERVE DOES NOT MEET BUFFER REQUIREMENTS AFTER REMOVAL OF EXOTICS AND SUPPLEMENTAL PLANTING WITHIN THE PRESERVE, PLANTINGS WILL BE PROVIDED IN THE 6' WIDE RESERVATION TO MEET THE BUFFER REQUIREMENTS. THE TYPE, SIZE, AND NUMBER OF SUCH PLANTINGS, IF NECESSARY, WILL BE DETERMINED AT TIME OF INITIAL SDP OR PLAT AND INCLUDED ON THE LANDSCAPE PLANS FOR THE SDP OR PLAT. 3. 10 FOOT WIDE TYPE 'A' LANDSCAPE BUFFER IF PROJECT TO THE NORTH IS DEVELOPED WITH COMMERCIAL, OTHERWISE, A 15 FOOT WIDE TYPE 'B' LANDSCAPE BUFFER IS REQUIRED. RANDALL CURVE MPUD GradyN inor ;fflrru U Cr dy nifuur you VM'e" Any xO ro Ucf 1PE CDp&.' awrna svrinas. fivrdx 3rraa �XNIBIT �' Civil lingi !c ,w . Land sarv¢ nrs h�' -19 ,sn ten,, ., Y Plarrnera . Lanuscape Arrhitrefs MASTLER PLAN NOTES DAM, earl. nlAuu., tl1.".. �� AuxlnCns Lf, z[on2fin 13nr3ia .Sprin&s-- 23.9.n� 7.1 f 94 gpge � i�. /.Y�atlY417nar. rnm fort hfyerv; 232ti!H).�,'Sfl0 REVISED: JUt-Y eraxnja': 29, 2020 acAa-is enr.�r c-vr HISTORICAL RESOURCES This record search is for informational purposes only and does NOT constitute a R project review. This search only identifies resources recorded at the Florida Master Site File and does NOT provide project approval from the Division of Historical Resources. Contact the Compliance and Review Section of the Division of Historical Resources at 850-245-6333 for project review information. April 29, 2020 Sharon Umpenhour Senior Planning Technician 0 (ird' dYiNlinor Q. Grady Minor and Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey Bonita Springs, FL 34134 Phone - 239.947.1144; Fax - 239.947,0375 Email - sum enhour ',g_radyminor.com In response to your inquiry of April 29, 2020 the Florida Master Site File lists no cultural resources recorded at the designated area of a PUD Rezone in Collier County in Section 22, Township 48 South, Range 27 East When interpreting the results of our search, please consider the following information: • This search area may contain unrecorded archaeological sites, historical structures or other resources even if previously surveyed for cultural resources. • Because vandalism and looting are common at Florida sites, we ask that you limit the distribution of location information on archaeological sites. • While many of our records document historically significant resources, the documentation of a resource at the Florida Master Site File does not necessarily mean the resource is historically significant. • Federal, state and local laws require formal environmental review for most projects. This search DOES NOT constitute such a review. If your project falls under these laws, you should contact the Compliance and Review Section of the Division of Historical Resources at 850-245-6333. Please do not hesitate to contact us if you have any questions regarding the results of this search. Sincerely, Eman M. Vovsi, Ph.D. Florida Master Site File Eman.Vovsi DOS.M Florida.com -500 South Bronough Street • Tallahassee, FL 32399-0250 • www.flheritage.Corn/preservationIsitefile 850.245.6440 ph J 850.245.6439 fax j SiteFile@dos.state.fl.uS WELL FIELD PROTECTION Collier County Well Field Protection Zones 2010 Well Field Protection Zones W - 1 Zone = I Year Travel Time Isocontour W - 2 Zone = 2 Year Travel 7mo Isocontour lnumkalee Field W - 3 zone = 5 Year Travel Time Isocontour Well Field - W 4 Zone = 20 Year Travel Time Isocontour f q Miles iirll 0 2 4 8 —7 Lee County ry V&11 Field Lee County Collier County Utilities Golden rate 7— MR Field k- r z V 7 City of V919191 Naples n� T Coasts[ f Ridge Mil Field ..r. !r J� : V T' 7 Ave V&H Oily of Naples . rGolden .. Well Field 7 7 1 7 7-- U Collier County Utilities -.z Golden Gate Well Field -7, Florida Governmental 77 iL Utility Authority Golden Gabs City i Well Field Everglades City Well Field Jf CI*Ir County Port of the Islands Nil Field LISTED SPECIES SURVEY April 2020 RANDALL CURVE MPUD COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA Collier Environmental Consultants Inc. 3211 68t` St SW Naples, Florida 34105 (239) 263-2687 marcoe@prodigy.net INTRODUCTION: This report is an account of a Listed wildlife and plants species survey recently performed on 50.18 acre tract called Randall Curve MPUD. Its purpose is to identify and describe key habitats and report any listed species using the site that would be at risk due to possible future development actions on the site. This survey and report is based on fieldwork performed during March -April 2020. DESCRIPTION: Randall Curve MPUD consists of approximately 50.18 acres and is located in Section 22, Township 48, Range 27, in Collier County. This parcel is found west of Immokalee Road and east of 4 h Street Northeast in Golden Gate Estates. The following is a habitat breakdown. See Exhibit # 1 - Location Map FLUCCS HABITAT 310 Dry Herbaceous 321 Palmetto 411 D Pine Flatwoods ACREAGE 514 Ditch 624D Slash pine, cypress, Cabbage palm Disturbed 740 Disturbed — Clear 742 Borrow Area 4108 Slash pine, cypress, cabbage palm Disturbed 8144 Roadway LISTED SPECIES SURVEY: 9.64 0.63 11.58 0.36 1.56 4.71 0.19 19.94 1.57 The required survey for a Listed Species Survey calls for a survey covering 100 % of the site, at prescribed transect distances per site acreage. Such a survey was conducted in March - April 2020. Established transects were oriented north - south and east - west and superimposed on an aerial map of the site. These transects were attempted by ground - locating and walked by compass bearing. Straight transects were very difficult to walk at times because of the Brazilian pepper density. The site was examined via straight and meandering transects with periodic stationary observations. These transects were conducted Early morning (0730 - 1000), mid -day (1100 - 1500) and late -day (1500 - 1800) time periods. This survey was conducted daily for several days. All possible species of plants and animals listed by state and federal agencies were noted. In addition, to the transects walked stationary observation was periodically utilized. Careful observations noting calls, tracks, scat, roosting and nest sites were conducted. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Listed Flora Several Tillandsia spp. were seen on site. Refer to Exhibit # 2 - Cumulative Plant List A description of the wildlife found onsite is provided below. Refer to Exhibit 4 3 - Wildlife Species Observed Key Species Discussion : Taking into account the location and condition of the property and State and Federal listed species that could be found on or around the site include_ Red Cockaded Woodpeckers Red -Cockaded woodpeckers are known to inhabit Pine Flatwoods. Observations were keyed to searching for signs or calls of these animals. All mature pines were checked along the transect routes. Particular attention was paid to the south and west faces of the trees, as that seems to be the predominant location of cavity openings. No individuals or cavity trees were identified during this survey. Big Cypress Fox Squirrels The area is known as potential fox squirrel habitat. Observations were keyed to searching for signs or calls of these animals, such as leaf nests in canopy trees or the distinctive chattering of territorial squirrels. No individuals were observed foraging and/or inhabit ting the subject parcel. No chewed pines found. Four (4) leaf nests were identified o site. Prior to any site clearing a through Big Cypress Fox squirrel survey needs to be conducted. A prior listed species survey conducted by Johnson Engineering on February 2006 documented two Big Cypress Fox squirrels on the project site. Florida Black Bear No individuals were observed during this survey even though Black bears are known to inhabit the general area. Special attention was given for signs such as scraps, tracks and scat. This mammal has a large home range and is known to inhabit the area. Bonneted Bat The Florida bonneted bat is the largest species of bat in Florida. Previously known as the Florida (Wagner's) mastiff bats these bats were reclassified as a separate species unique to Florida. The species can grow to a length of 6.5 inches with a wingspan of 20 inches. This is a flying mammal free to traverse great distances. Examination of all trees with potential cavities was conducted. The site does have a few dead pines trees. The dead trees seem recent probably caused by Hurricane Irma. Special examination of all these trees were conducted. Specifically, these trees were examined for any cavities and/or snags. Some of the dead trees on site have not degraded sufficiently. The density of Brazilian pepper and other midstory plants would impede flight patterns. No individuals and/or guano were found. This project is not anticipated to negatively impact the species. Florida Panther No individuals have been documented utilizing this project site or identified during this survey. This species does have a large home range and is known to inhabit Golden Gate Estates and surrounding areas. The site is located within the Secondary Panther Zone. This project will be reviewed via consultation with U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service when the project applies for an Environmental Resource Permit. CONCLUSION: Transects were walked throughout the entire parcel. Stationary observations were also done through prime habitat areas. All transects were walked at varying times from post - dawn & mid -day to pre -sunset hours. The entire site has a midstory of Brazilian pepper. There are other exotics present such as ear leaf acacia, melaleuca and carrotwood. Brazilian pepeer is the dominate extic on site.The project site still does have some recognizable character to support some limited foraging by some common small mammals and birds. Signs of small animal usage such as armadillo were readily visible. Several species of songbirds were seen utilizing this site, especially the canopy areas. The entire site shows signs of greater ecological function. The parcel is currently surrounded by roadway and single family homes. The hydrological regime has been altered. The lack of fire has led to dense vegetation. The entire site is made up of both wetland and upland plant species neither gain dominance. A listed species study was conducted by Johnson Engineering on February 2006. This study found two Big Cypress Fox squirrel utilizing this site. No fox squirrels were observed in recent field observations. No listed animal species or signs thereof were identified on the property, during this survey. Four,leaf litter nests were observed, as such fox squirrels are suspected. A few Tillandsia's spp. was also observed on site. Prior to any site clearing a full Big Cypress Fox squirrel survey should be required. Vertebrates - Threatened EndanlZered and S ecies of Special Concern species Present Absent Black bear x Florida panther X Everglades mink X Big Cypress Fox squirrel (Suspected) x Bonneted Bat X Indigo snake x American alligator x Gopher tortoise X Gopher Frog x Southeastern American kestrel Red -Cockaded woodpecker Florida Scrub Jay Wood stork Snail kite Bald eagle Limpkin Osprey White ibis Tricolored heron Snowy egret Reddish egret Little blue heron Listed Vegetation Tillandsia spp. x - .. .� . egg . .. -c �r _ :-•--: 35h Avenue Northwest :a35 •Aven ue•�artheast' :vamnatN x a Gra g �d Rapids C auf®vard '^^�33rdAvenue 'Northwesfr33rd -Ave nue'iVertheast • a. • `' t�iE;liilelilRoad a Grove M ive o � a 41 Cai . a QT �tourY m ���_ .: .. inlet C©ve Lane East �,� �. �' ;: Grove•.' � 25th�Aven"e Northwest 25th•Avenue'Nartheast d tee ,':. V : R• - a ve'•Trad s i �� 24 ,Avenue'Northveest 24th•Avenue°Northeast a- °22 nd+Avenue Narthwest� <.�� 22rd-Ave nue-Northeast � fib• � _. e > � f I f � 2attTAvenue Northwest MA xAvenue,{;rtheast atl , F-:I'=�7 Ma Wise 2419. R Copyright ma MapWise, Inc. All rights reserved, vwdw.mapwise.com. This map is informational only. No representation is made or warranty given as to its content. User assumes all risk of use. MapWise and its suppliers assume no responsibility for any losses resulting from such use. LOCATION Selected Custom Parcels Streets MapWise County Boundaries Parcel Outlines 0 340 680 1020 it 624D I 4109 141 8144 31Q y 514 ' 4109 411D I� 11 411D� 310 t w � 411D / 742 --- 321 yI 740 Nod° FLUCCS HA61TAT ACREAGE p r> 51DRY HERBACEOUS 9.64 321 PALMETTO 0.53 411 D (E1) PINE FLATWOODS (DISTURBED) 11.58 E1 (EXOTICS 0 — 25%) 514 DITCH 0.36 624D (E1) PINE, CYPRESS, CABBAGE PALM 1.56 N (DISTURBED) 740 DISTURBED LANDS 4.71 742 BORROW AREA 0.19 4109 E1 SLASH PINE. CYPRESS, CABBAGE PALM ( ) (DISTURBED) 19.94 8144 ROAD 1.57 a 200' 4;G0• TOTAL 50.18 SCALE: 1" = 400' WHEN PLOTTED @ 8.5" X 11- RANDALL CURVE MPUD �`"&II,�..�, ® GradyMinar 0. Dradrnllnorenalia"W. F, Key culls: 311i11/ via INI ICCy RoniW 9Pringn. liw5da 31131 mmr—ty FLUCECS MAP none C1vIi engineers Land Surveyors Planners Landscape ArohitvGLs qpu� IPIO rrv.wa„aa. us wm;:t,t ax nrn„m_ca norwiri nnsrixeaar,zeaoo2ee 50UHCE: COLLIER COUNFY PROPERTY APPRAfSER, FLOWN: JAN 2020 NAAW ma nmriw 8nnnr.„239..W7.lt4r nwn.r, radyafixnr. r.orrr Fbrt Myeta Z3A.69013HO Furrfls wn 9HE8T } DF 1 FLUCCS CODE AND VEGETATION INVENTORY FLUCCS CODE (Description) Common Name Scientific Name Indicator Status 310 Dry Herbaceous 9.64 acres Uplands This area is located along the western boundary of the subject parcel. This area has scattered Slash pines with an open midstory and ground cover. The following plants were identified in this area. Slash pine Pinus elliotti UPL Cp,O Palmetto Serona repens FACU G,O Goldenaster Pityopsis graminifolia UPL G,C Ground lichen Cladina subtenus G,O Grape vine Vitis rotundifolia FAC G,D Poison ivy Toxicodendron radians FAC G,O Smilax Smilax spp. FAC G,C Broom sedge Andropogon virginicus FAC- G,O Caesar weed Urena lobata FACU G,C 321 Palmetto 0.63 acres Uplands This area consists of a sparse Slash pine canopy with a palmetto understory. The area would be considered upland. The area is vegetated with a variety of species. The following species were identified within this habitat. Slash pine Pinus elliotti UPL Cp,D Cabbage palm Sabal palmetto FAC M,C Dahoon holly Ilex cassine OBL M,O Palmetto Serona repens FACU G,C Melaleuca Melaleuca quinquenervia Exotic Cp,D Brazilian pepper Schinus terebinihifolius Exotic M,D Winged Sumac Rhus copallina UPL M,O Myrsine Myrsine floridana FAC M,C Penny royal Piloblephis rigida UPL G,O fetterbush Lyonia lucida FACW M,O Gallberry Ilex glabra FACW M,C buckthorn Bumelia rechnata FAC M,O Florida trema Trema spp. FAC M,O Dewberries Rubus spp. FAC G,C Broom sedge Andropogon virginicus FAC G,O Beggers ticks Bidens alba FACW G,O Ragweed Ambrosia artemissiifolia FACU G,C Grape vine Vitis rotundifolia FAC G,D Poison ivy Toxicodendron radians FAC G,O Smilax Smilax spp. FAC G,C snowberry Chiococca parvifolia UPL G,O 4109 Slash Pine, Cypress, Cabbage Palm - Disturbed 19.94 acres Upland El- Exotics 0 — 25% This is one of the largest habitats on site. This habitat starts along the northern boundary and extends all the way south. This habitat is a mixture of vegetation. The site has a Slash pine canopy with scattered cypress, cabbage palms, and laurel oaks. The midstory is dominated with Brazilian pepper and myrsine. This area has suffered from a disruption of hydrology and a fire regime. The following plants species were identified in this habitat. Slash pine Pinus elliotti UPL Cp,D Cabbage palm Sabal palmetto FAC M,C Cypress Taxodium spp. OBL Cp,C palmetto Serona repens FACU G,O Laurel oak Quercus laurifolia FACW Cp,O Myrsine Myrsine floridana FAC M,C Caesar weed Urena lobata FACU G,C Ear leaf acacia Acacia auriculiformis Exotic Cp,M,O carrotwood Cupaniopsis anacardioides Exotic M,O Penny royal Piloblephis rigida UPL G,O Chocolate weed Melochia corchorifolia FAC G,C Pipewort Lachnocaulon anceps FACW G,C Yellow -eyed grass Xyris elliottii OBL G,C Grape vine Vitis rotundifolia FAC G,D Poison ivy Toxicodendron radians FAC G,O Smilax Smilax spp. FAC G,C 411D Slash Pine —Disturbed 11.58 acres Upland El- Exotics 0 -25 % The area has a dense carpet of Grape vine. This area would be considered upland. There are two general areas where this habitat is located. The denser one is located along Immokalee Road to the east. Then this habitat is located along its western boundary 4th Street NE. This habitat is a Slash pine dominated canopy with palmetto understory. Lack of fire has made the western portion almost impenetrable. The following species were identified in this habitat. Slash pine Pinus elliotti UPL Cp,D Palmetto Serona repens FACU G,C Cabbage palm Sabal palmetto FAC M,C Brazilian pepper Schinus terebinthifolius Exotic M,D Winged Sumac Rhus copallina UPL M,O Myrsine Myrsine floridana FAC M,C Grape vine Vitis rotundifolia FAC G,D Poison ivy Toxicodendron radians FAC G,O Smilax Smilax spp, FAC G,C bracken fern Pteridium aquilinum FACU G,O Sweet bay Magnolia virginiana FACW` M,O Buckthorn Bumelia reclinata FAC M,O fetterbush Lyonia lucida FACW M,O Gallberry Ilex glabra FACW M,C Rabbit tobacco Pseudognaphalium obtusifolium UPL G,O 514 Ditch 0.36 acres Other Surface Waters This is a drainage ditch that traverse along the northern end of the subject parcel. This ditch begins by Immokalee Road and extends past our property line. Cattails Typha spp OBL G,O Maidencane Panicum hemitomo OBL G,C Blue Maidencane Amphicarpum muhlenbergianum FACW G,O Torpedo grass Panicum repens FACW G,O 624 D Slash Pine, Cypress, Cabbage palm - Disturbed 1.56 acres Upland E1— Exotics 0 — 25% This is one of the largest natural habitats within this project. The species composition consists of both wetland and upland plant species. The area does not meet the criteria as Jurisdictional wetlands. Hydrological indicators are inconsistent due to hydrological alteration of the area. Soil samples showed sandy soils. The canopy consists primarily of cypress with some Slash pines. The midstory and ground cover consists of both wetland and upland plants neither gaining dominance. Slash pine Cabbage palm Cypress palmetto Laurel oak Ear leaf acacia Strangler fig carrotwood Myrsine Beauty bush Snowberry Dahoon holly Pinus elliotti UPL Cp,C Sabal palmetto FAC M,C Taxodium spp. OBL Cp,C Serona repens FACU G,O Quercus laurifolia FACW Cp,O Acacia auriculiformis Exotic Cp,M,C Ficus aurea FAC M,O Cupaniopsis anacardioides Exotic M,C Myrsine floridana FAC M,C I GC Callicarpa Americana UPL M,O Chiococca alba UPL G,C Ilex cassine OBL M,O Red maple Acer rubrum FAC M,O Cocoplum Chrysobalanus icaco FACW M,O Swamp fern Blechnum serrulatum FACW+ G,O Chain fern Woodwardia virginica OBL G,O Brazilian pepper Schinus terebinthifolius Exotic M,C wax myrtle Myrica cerifera FAC+ M,O Melaleuca Melaleuca quinquenervia Exotic Cp,O Broom sedge Andropogon virginicus FAC- G,O Caesar weed Urena lobata FACU G,O Virginia creeper Ampelopsis quinquefolia FAC G.O Cat -briar Smilax spp. FAC G,C Poison ivy Toxicodendron radicans FAC G,O Grape vine Vitis rotundifolia FAC G,D Whitehead broom Spermacoce verticillata FAC G,C paspalum Paspalum monostachyum OBL G,O Florida Trema Trema spp. FAC M,O Chocolate weed Melochia corchorifolia FAC G,C 740 Disturbed 4.71 acres Upland This is a cleared field. This area is maintained. Bahiagrass Paspalum notatum FACU G,D 742 Borrow Area 0.19 acres Other Surface Waters This area had some fill excavated. As such, it is below natural grade and vegetated with pioneer plant species. The following plants were identified in this habitat. Brazilian pepper Schinus terebinthifolius Exotic M,C Laurel oak Quercus laurifolia FACW Cp,O Carolina willow Salix caroliniana OBL M,C wax myrtle Myrica cerifera FAC+ M,O Torpedo grass Panicum repens FACW G,O Broom sedge Andropogon virginicus FAC- G,O 8144 Roads and Highway - Immokalee Road 1.57 acres ABREVIATIONS — Canopy (Cp), Midstory (M), Ground Cover (G) Dominant (D), Common (C), Occasional (0) INDICATOR STATUS - Obligate (OBL), Facultative wet plants (FACW), Facultative plants (FAC), Upland (UPL) T+ piphytic Plants Wild Pines Stiff - leaved Recurved wired -leaved Shoestring fern Golden polypody Tillandsia fasiculata FDA/C T. balbisiana FDA/T T. setacea FDA/T Vittaria lineata Polypodium sp. WILDLIFE SPECIES OBSERVED Common Name Species .Amphibian & Reptiles: Six- lined racerunner Cnemido horns sexlineatus Brown anole Anolis sagrei Black racer CoIumber constrictor Birds: Dove- mourning Zenaida macroura Pileated woodpecker Dryocopus pileatus Red bellied woodpecker Melanerpes carolinus Northern flicker Colaptes auratus Crow, American Corvus brach h nchos Common grackle Quiscalus quiscula Bluejay Cyanocitta cristata Carolina wren Tbryothorus ludovicianus Gray catbird Dumetella carolinensis Northern mockingbird Mimus polyRlottos Cardinal Richrnondena cardinalis Brown thrasher Toxostoma ndum Red -shouldered Hawk Biteo lineatus Vulture, turkey Cathartes aura Vulture, Black Coragyps atratus Cattle egret Bubulcus ibis Mammals: Virginia opossum Didelphis virginiana Raccoon Procyon lotor mm Bobcat Felis rufus Coyote Canis lantrans Hispid cotton rat Si mg odon hisspidus Nine -banded armadillo Dasypus novemcinctu Cottontail Rabbit Sylvilagus floridanus Status Copyright 2020 MapWise, Inc. All rights reserved. www.mapwise.com, This map is informaBonal only. No representation is made or warranty given as to its content. User assumes all risk of use. MapWise and its supplters assume no responsibility for any losses resulting from such use, TRANSECTS WALKED Labels Drawing Points Drawing 3' Lines Drawing Polygons Drawing Selected Custom Parcels ' e� Streets OSM Hybrid n� i, County Boundaries J% Parcel Outlines 0 340 680 1020 ft O 0 0 0 Op Note: All information is based on the katesl data as 0 O pp mage av2iiable by Florida Fish & Wltllife Commission wi Subject Property 7ni -I-Mile Radius 0 Black Bear Related Calls (FWC 2016-2018) FWC Black Bear Range Florida (2016) Black Bear Presence OnAbundant Common Occasional Rare Randall Curve Collier County, Florida 0 0 00 ,C'%jlh7"D EARTH TECH ENVIRONMENTAL, LLC 10600 JOLEA AVENUE BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34135 PHONE (239) 304-0030 FAX (239) 774-0800 UPENOM WWW.ETEFLORIDA.COM Environmental, LLC o HENDRY 00 .0 00 CD 0 a O c Odp00 0 $ 0 0 0 76 a O o a FWC Black Bear Information TE I PROJECTn.. I W4LE 04/15/20 NIA BONNETED BAT CONSULTATION AREA (All Of Collier County Is in the Consultation Area) PASCO LAKE ORANGE 14ILLSBOROUGH OSCEOLA POLK 0, BREVARD Ocean INDIAN RIVER 'HARDEE MANATEE OKFFGHOBEE ST LUCIE DE SOTO HIGHLANDS SARASOTA A \ MARTIN Lake CHARLOT-tF GLADES L , Okemhobiqp LEE HENDRY PALM BEACH Gulf of Mexico Legend 2019 Florida Bonneted get Consultation Area South Rcrida Urban Bat Area 112.5 25 50 Miles Figure 1. Florida Bonneted Bat Consultation Area. Hatched area (Figure 2) identifies the urban development boundary in Miami -Dade and Broward County. Applicants with projects in this area should contact the Service for specific guidance addressing this area and individual consultation. The Consultation Key should not be used for projects in this area, PANTHER CONSULTATION AREA PROJECT LOCATED IN SECONDARY ZONE t C] p71 LL . w ... 8 _ �y Immokalee Road/4t" Street N.E. Mixed Use Subdistrict (PL20190002355) Exhibit V.D Growth Management The proposed Golden Gate Area Master Plan, Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub -Element amendment establishes the Immokalee Road/4th Street N.E. Mixed Use Subdistrict. The new subdistrict will provide for a variety of retail, office, personal service and residential land uses. Access to the property will be via Immokalee Road and a vehicular interconnection with the property located immediately north of the subdistrict. The maximum non-residential square footage permitted is 150,000 square feet. The maximum allowable number of residential dwelling units will be 400. Under Chapter 163 F.S., local governments are authorized to adopt and amend their comprehensive plans. Staff has requested that the applicant address three sections from Chapter 163. Chapter 163.3167 Scope of act.— (9) Each local government shall address in its comprehensive plan, as enumerated in this chapter, the water supply sources necessary to meet and achieve the existing and projected water use demand for the established planning period, considering the applicable plan developed pursuant to s. 373.709. The project will be provided potable water and sewer service by Collier County Utilities. No capacity issues exist or are anticipated in the service area. Chapter 163.3177 (6) (a) 2. The future land use plan and plan amendments shall be based upon surveys, studies, and data regarding the area, as applicable, including: a. The amount of land required to accommodate anticipated growth. b. The projected permanent and seasonal population of the area. c. The character of undeveloped land. d. The availability of water supplies, public facilities, and services. e. The need for redevelopment, including the renewal of blighted areas and the elimination of nonconforming uses which are inconsistent with the character of the community. f. The compatibility of uses on lands adjacent to or closely proximate to military installations. g. The compatibility of uses on lands adjacent to an airport as defined in s. 330.35 and consistent with s. 333.02. h. The discouragement of urban sprawl. December22, 2020 W GradyiVlinor Page 1 of 5 RCIRP-19 Exhibit VD Growth Management-r2.docx I;lvll F;ngfneers • Land Survcyorti • Pianncrs • Landscapc Archttccts Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, FL 34134 • 239-947-1144 • engineering@gradyminor.com • www.gradyminor.com The need for job creation, capital investment, and economic development that will strengthen and diversify the community's economy. The need to modify land uses and development patterns within antiquated subdivisions. Chapter 163.3177 8. Future land use map amendments shall be based upon the following analyses: a. An analysis of the availability of facilities and services. b. An analysis of the suitability of the plan amendment for its proposed use considering the character of the undeveloped land, soils, topography, natural resources, and historic resources on site. c. An analysis of the minimum amount of land needed to achieve the goals and requirements of this section. The Immokalee Road/4t" Street N.E. Mixed Use Subdistrict is consistent with Chapter 163.3177, F.S. The property is currently owned by Collier County Real Property and is selling the property with the understanding that the contract purchaser is attempting to modify the Golden Gate Area Master Plan in order to permit a mixed -use project at this location. At numerous public meetings, residents of the rural Golden Gate Estates area have indicated their desire to have more opportunities to dine or shop nearer to their homes in Golden Gate Estates, rather than to make a more than 5 mile trip west to the urban area in order to obtain daily goods and services. The subject property has access to Immokalee Road, a major arterial county roadway, and water and sewer availability. The site was previously contemplated for nonresidential use as a County maintenance facility and public -school bus depot; however, residents in the immediate area vocalized their opposition to this plan. In the recent public engagement process for evaluating the Golden Gate Area Master Plan, residents expressed their desire to have additional opportunities near their homes where they could shop, dine or obtain personal services. The applicant is also proposing to provide a mixed -use opportunity at this location by providing for up to 400 dwelling units. All of the rural Golden Gate Estates provides opportunities for low density single-family residential dwellings at a density of 1 du/2.5 acre. Providing for higher density residential development will provide needed housing options for the area residents. The applicant had retained services of an economist to analyze the commercial and residential market and they have prepared a report that concludes that demand exists for the requested intensity of development. The analysis also considers that in a separate Golden Gate Estates Master Plan Amendment that the previously approved Estates Shopping Center Subdistrict is proposing to reduce the allowable commercial square footage from 190,000 square feet to 50,000 square feet. The reduction of 140,000 square feet of space at the intersection of Golden Gate Boulevard and Wilson Boulevard is effectively being shifted to the subject property located at Immokalee Road and 4t" Street S.E. The plan amendment will result in a net increase of only 10,000 square feet of newly allocated commercial space within the market drive time demand analysis. Factors for the on -going demand for alternative housing types and additional Page 2 of 5 commercial development include the convenience of having shopping and dining in closer proximity to their homes and opportunities for housing other than large lot single family homes. The subdistrict includes all available land under single ownership of a size adequate to support a mixed -use project. 163.3184 Process for adoption of comprehensive plan or plan amendment. This section of the statute outlines the process and authority for agency review of plan amendments. The applicant understands that regional and state reviewing agencies will be responsible for review of any comprehensive plan amendments per the requirements of Chapter 163.3184 F.S. The applicant's experts are of the opinion that there are no regional or state impacts associated with the application. Proiect Justification Future Land Use Element: The proposed amendment is to the Golden Gate Area Master Plan, Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub -Element. The establishment of this subdistrict is similar to other prior amendments to the Golden Gate Area Master Plan, which have established through the statutory plan amendment process uses and development standards for uses other than very low -density single-family residential development. The community has acknowledged that a continuation of this low - density land use pattern has resulted in urban sprawl. Many areas within the Rural Golden Gate Estates area do not have available water and sanitary sewer services. The subject property does have available water and sanitary sewer service available from Collier County Utilities. The subject property is also on Immokalee Road which is one of Collier County's busiest arterial roadways and the primary arterial providing access to Golden Gate Estates residents. In 2019 this segment of Immokalee Road carried nearly 40,000 average annual daily vehicle trips making it one of Collier County's heaviest traveled roadways. With the six -lane roadway and heavy traffic volumes, the property is not conducive or compatible for low density residential development. In addition to the Golden Gate Area Master Plan the property is subject to general policies of the Collier County Growth Management Plan. Policies 5.5 and 5.7 of the Future Land Use Element discourage urban sprawl by confining urban intensities of development to those areas designated Urban on the Future Land Use Map. The proposed amendment does not represent urban sprawl. The subject property is served by urban services and has commercial and residential development located to the west, south and east. Policy 5.6 requires that new developments shall be compatible with and complementary to the surrounding land uses as set forth in the Land Development Code. The amendment is accompanied by a PUD rezoning application which provides for land uses with development Page 3 of 5 standards which will result in a compatible relationship with surrounding development. The PUD also provides for large buffers to the most immediate neighboring residences. The amendment is complementary in that it provides for shopping, dining and personal services conveniently located for area residents, resulting in fewer vehicle miles traveled. The variety of housing proposed with complement the single dwelling unit type currently permitted in the immediate area. Objective 7 and the implementing policies promote interconnection with adjoining neighborhoods and streets. The property will provide for an interconnection to the property located immediately to the north, which will provide an opportunity to obtain access to the signalized intersection at Orangetree Boulevard. Transportation Element: Policy 5.1 requires that all projects are evaluated to determine their effect on the overall countywide density or intensity of permissible development, with consideration of their impact on the overall County transportation system, and shall not approve any petition or application that would directly access a deficient roadway segment as identified in the current AUIR or if it impacts an adjacent roadway segment that is deficient as identified in the current AUIR. This Growth Management Plan Amendment application includes a comprehensive assessment of the transportation impacts associated with the project and concludes there is not detrimental impact to the roadway level of service. Public Facilities Element: The property is served by potable water and sanitary sewer services. Water and sewer is provided by Collier County Utilities. No capacity issues have been identified or are anticipated in the future. The site will require a modification of a previously issued South Florida Water Management District permit for improvements related to the proposed commercial uses on a portion of the site. Conservation and Coastal Management Element: Policy 6.1.1 requires that developments containing native vegetation communities must retain a minimum of 15% of existing native vegetation for commercial developments and a minimum of 25% of the existing native vegetation on -site for mixed use developments unless circumstances warrant a lesser preservation area on -site. As part of the contract for purchase of the property from Collier County, the applicant is required to provide water management facilities on -site, which will serve not only the mixed use project but also provide for additional surface water management for future planned roadway improvements to facilitate expansion of the Immokalee Road/Randall Boulevard intersection. Due to the provisions of additional lands for future expansion of essential public services a 10% reduction in native vegetation preservation on this site is warranted. The subdistrict requires on -site preservation of 15% of the existing native vegetation and is consistent with the policies of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element. Page 4 of 5 A portion of the property has previously been cleared for use by Collier County as a water management area in support of existing and future improvements to Immokalee Road. The County also requires the applicant to reserve additional areas on -site to provide for future roadway improvements to Randall Boulevard and Immokalee Road. These circumstances warrant retention of 15% native vegetation for this subdistrict. Page 5 of 5 EXHIBIT V.D1 COMMERCIAL NEEDS ANALYSIS AND RESIDENTIAL MARKET STUDY FOR SUBJECT PROPERTY AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF 4T" STREET N.E. AND IMMOKALEE ROAD COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA August 26, 2020 Prepared for SageStone Partners I LLC Building B, Suite 120 5775 Glenridge Drive Atlanta, GA 30328 Prepared by Planning— Execution—Re%Its o Real Estate Econometrics, Inc. Real Estate Econometrics, Inc. Suite 100 707 Orchid Drive Naples, Florida 34102 (239) 269-1341 Ree-i.com Background SageStone Partners ("Client") is submitting a Collier County Growth Management Plan ("GMP") amendment to change the zoning on two parcels totaling 50.18 +/- acres ("Subject Property") located at the northeast corner of 4t" Street NE and Immokalee Road in Collier County, Florida. The Subject Property is located within the Estates Designation, Mixed Use District, Residential Estates Sub -District and is currently zoned E, Estates. The Client is seeking to change the Future Land Use Element ("FLUM") to Estates Designation, Mixed Planned Use District, (Randall Curve or Immokalee Road/4t" Street N.E.) Mixed Use Sub -District. The Client is interested in developing the Subject Property as a C-4 Commercial site including 150,000 square feet of various uses as permitted in the C-4 designation. The Client is also interested in developing 400 residential units on the Subject Property. The Client is proposing the transfer of 140,000 square feet of approved commercial from their Subject Property at the corner of Wilson Boulevard and Golden Gate Boulevard to the Subject Property. The 140,000 square feet is already accounted for in the supply analysis portion of this study. The Client has retained Real Estate Econometrics, Inc. ("Consultant") to prepare a Commercial Needs Analysis to determine the potential for developing the various C-4 uses on the Subject Site as required by the Collier County Future Land Use Element ("FLUE"). The FLUE requires a commercial needs analysis ("Study") with the submittal of a commercial rezone within a Mixed -Use Activity Center. The Consultant has also been retained to prepare a residential market study ("Residential Study") for the proposed 400 residential units. The proposed sub district is not located within an Activity Center. Therefore, Collier County staff has requested a commercial needs analysis and parallel residential market study for the Subject Property. The Consultant is well -versed in preparing real estate needs analysis and market studies especially in the Southwest Florida marketplace. The Commercial Needs Study is comprised of four parts; the site assessment, population growth around the Subject Property, the market supply and demand analysis, and conclusions. The Residential Study focuses on condominium and apartment development and is comprised of three parts; population growth, market supply and demand analysis, and conclusions. 1.0 COMMERCIAL NEEDS ANALYSIS Subject Property Attributes The Subject Property is located on the north and west side of Immokalee Road at the corner of 4t" street NE and Immokalee Road at the bend in Immokalee Road in Section 22 — Township 48 — Range 27. An aerial locator photo (Figure 1.0 below) is followed by a summary of the Subject Property's legal, location, zoning, and land use attributes obtained from the Collier County Property Appraiser website on the next page. Figure 1.0. Proposed Immokalee Road/4t" Street N.E. 50-Acre MPUD Location Map Source: ESRI ArcMap 10.8 2 Parcel 1 Property Summary Parcd No 3T69004m, Sit, Address 9isslaimv Sine City site 2P0a -rvoa Name/Address COLUERCNTY C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 3335 TAMIAMI TR E STE 101 CRY NAPLES Stale rL Z3p 34112 Map Na. Strap No. —1— Township Range A— aE b..ttd 3 C22 332S06 A 13122 22 4E 27 4s.02 .,.I GOLDEN GATE FST UMR22TRACT A.I.E35 T1fNT 1361 POR110N OF TRACT"A-ASDESCINOR3080PG723,ASAMENO£DINOR4U9Mi35&ANDL THATPORTIONASOESC{NOR4079PG MJ�ige gTeaO 285 Millege PateaO `Calmlatlem Sub./Cando 332500-GOLDEN GATE ESTUND22 Schaai O:hr Teul Uatf�e0 86- COUNTIES INCLUDING NON -MUNICIPAL GOY 5.08E Es— 13.1401 Latest Sales History 2019 Certified Tax Roll Date Book -Page Amould Land Va€ue $ 2.354.]00 07/28/06 40T9E}56 SO Ii1 Impmead Value SO 11/18/08 0fi/30/BE }9]p-3e`¢ 1361�2019 ------ 30 I_I hl s tW.. SG $2,354,200 t-1 10% Cap 5 Z.—'— t=1 A —a Y 1— 5497,21E 1. I Scheel Towable VA.. S 0 -I TaaabSR Valw Ifldl IN. sM1Pwnalien 1 Partd was<rntrd afG. 1M1e Flnallae Roll S 0 Parcel 2 Property Summary ParcANa 37690040100 Site Add,—Ipljaddmu 24704TH ST NE Sit City NAPLES Silt Zam•Nnm 34120 Name/Address COLLIERCNTY C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 3335 TAMIAMI TR L. SrE 101 Dry NAP— Stste FL Zip 14112 Map IN 3C22 Strap No, 332500 A23CZ3 Shipp 2! Tpwnship Range 48 27 Acres 'Em'mated 9.9 Legal GOLDEN GATE MUNIT22 THAT PORTION OFTRACT-A' AS DESC INOR3080 PG 723. AS CORRECTEDINOR40T9 PG 13M AND THAT PORTION OFTRACTAASDESC INOR4079 PG 1361 M_Ila eg AreaO 285 Millage RatezO •Calculations Sub./Condo 312500- GOLDEN GATT EVUNIT22 Scheel O[her Tetal uaecyd9-0 86- COUNTIES INCLUDING NON-MUNNINU. GOV. 5.083 8.557E 13.640E Latest Sales History 2019 Certified Tax Roll tpNal5a1N P.e IR<34 aaew TParm<�uonnl c-j ro ue.ad Dab Eeak-Papa Ameunl larM Value $ 253.OB0 07/28A4 4079-1358 11 r+I Imprevwd Valut $ 21,052 07/26/02 309=733 $ 1611700 r=I Morin VAea $2]4,132 1-I 1- Cap S 33,380 €=I Averred Mlua $240,]s2 1_I Srheal Towable Value S 0 I -I Towable Value S 0 3 Location Analysis The Subject Property's strategic location allows reasonable access to the site and provides for an ideal location for commercial activities. As noted above, the Subject Property is strategically located to accommodate the proposed C-4 commercial use. The commercial offerings will have high visibility to Immokalee Road. Figure 1.0 previously shows the location of the Subject Property. 1.1 Population Growth Around Subject Property Overview of Florida Population Florida is currently the nation's fourth most populous state, home to an estimated 21.8 million people according to the Census Bureau. By the year 2030, Florida's population is projected to total 24.4 million people according to the medium range series from the University of Florida's Bureau of Economic and Business Research. This represents an increase of 260,000 per year. Florida's population growth is depicted in Figure 1.1 below. This shows the latest projections of growth by county for the year 2030. As you can see, the most heavily populated counties in Florida are Broward, Miami -Dade and Palm Beach counties in Southeast Florida; Hillsborough and Pinellas counties in the Tampa metro market; Orange County in Central Florida, and Duval County in the Jacksonville metro area. Figure 1.1 2030 Population Projections by County Florida Counties Population Projections 2030 100,000 or less 100,001-250,000 _ 250,001 - 500,000 _ 500,001 - 1,000,000 _ 1,000,001 + Source: University of Florida Bureau of Economic and Business Research El Overview of Collier County Population Growth Currently, there are an estimated 373,000 people living year-round in Collier County. Since the 2000 Census, the County's population has increased by nearly 45%, the equivalent of 115,074 new residents as shown in Figure 2.2.1 below. Looking ahead, the County will continue to gain new residents at a rate greater than that of the state of Florida. By the year 2045, the population of Collier County is projected to total 569,322 residents. This is a projected annual growth rate of just over 2% from 2015 to 2040 compared to Florida's annual growth rate of 1.08% during the same time period. Table 1. Collier County Projected Population Growth Countywide Total Population Growth 2000 2010 2014 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 Permanent Population Estimates and Forecasts 257,926 322,653 340,293 347,002 383,166 416,607 446,284 484,017 524,939 569,322 5-year Percent Increase 7.55% 10.42% 8.73% 7.12% 8.45% 8.45% 8.45% 2.14% = Average Annual Growth Rate between 2015 and 2045 8.45% = Average 5-Year Growth between 2010 and 2030 to forecast 2035-2045 Source: Collier County Comprehensive Planning Section June 14, 2018 Source: Collier County Comprehensive Planning Section Population growth in Collier County is primarily due to the in -migration of the ongoing arrival of baby boomer retirees. The number of baby boomers reaching retirement age will peak in the early 2020s. (Rest of page left intentionally blank) 5 15-Minute Drive Time Demographic Detail The Urban Land Institute ("ULI") defines commercial shopping centers in three categories. The categories are neighborhood, community and regional. Those categories are characterized by drive times and size in square feet as shown in Table 1 below. Table 2. ULI Commercial Shopping Center Definitions Neighborhood Up to 10-Minute Drive Time = <100,000 Sq. Ft. Community 10-30 Minute Drive Time = 100,000 to 300,000 Sq. Ft. Regional 30-Minute and over Drive Time = >300,000 Sq. Ft. Source: Urban Land Institute, Dollars and Cents of Shopping Centers, 2008 The Subject Property proposed development plan would categorize it as a medium size Community Center. ULI defines Community Centers in their 2008 Dollars and Cents of Shopping Centers as follows: "The community shopping center is a larger than a neighborhood center but with neither a traditional department store nor the trade area of a regional shopping center. It includes traditional community shopping centers, power centers, town centers, lifestyle centers, and outlet/off-price centers that meet these criteria. The average total floor space (GLA and all other floor area) of the community centers in this study is about 192,700 square feet; the median is about 177,328 square feet with 80 percent of the centers between 109,195 and 376,200 square feet in size." Drive time areas are calculated by Environmental Systems Research Institute ("ESRI"). The ESRI Business Analyst program calculates drive times by actual street networks and posted speed limits. In general, Neighborhood Centers have a drive time area of up to 10 minutes, Community Centers have a drive time area of 10 to 20 minutes depending on the size and Regional Centers have a drive time area of 30 minutes and over depending on the size. Since the Subject Property is proposed for 150,000 square feet of commercial space, it falls within the Community Center category and the supply/demand analysis will be performed on a 15-minute drive time market area since its size falls in the middle of the Community Center category. I Figure 1.2 below depicts the 15-minute drive time area from the Subject Property. Figure 1.2. 15-Minute Drive Time from Subject Property Source: ESRI ArcGIS Business Analyst Mapping System (Rest of page left intentionally blank) 7 The following table 3 shows the U.S. Census demographic profile of the population that lives within the 15-minute drive time of the subject site. Table 3. Subject Property Drive Time Demographic and Income Profile #esri- Demographic .. income Profile Immokalee Roadi Street N. E. Naples, FL 34120 prepared by Esri Drive Time: 15 minute radius - - Summary Census 2010 2019 2024 Population 43,491 53,337 59,708 Households 15,464 19,217 21,529 Families 12,089 14,873 16,617 Average Household Size 2.80 2.77 2.77 Owner Occupied Housing Units 12,249 15,487 17,455 Renter Occupied Housing Units 3,215 3,730 4,074 Median Age 40.1 43.4 44.5 Trends: 2029 - 2024 Annual Rate Aren State National Population 2.28% 1.37% 0.779% Households 2.30% 1.31% 0.75 % Families 2-24% 1.26% 0.68% Owner HHs 2.42% 1.60% C.92 % Median Household Income 2.049% 2.37 % 2.70% 2019 2024 Households by Income Number Percent Number Percent <$15,000 667 3.5% 582 2.7% $15,000 - $24,999 994 5.2% 916 4.3% $25,000 - $34999 1,081 5.5% 983 4.6% $35,000 - $49:999 2,430 12.5% 2,361 11.D% $50, 000 - $74999 3, 666 19.1% 31743 17.4% $75,000 - $99:995 3,245 16.9% 3,650 17.0% $100, 000 - $149999 3,778 19.7% 4,660 21.6% $150,000 - $199:999 1,440 7.5% 2,012 9.3% $201 1,914 10.014. 2,623 12.2% Median Household Income $79,560 $88,028 Average Household Income $106,562 $121,802 Per Capita Income $38,639 $44,234 Census 2010 2019 2024 Population by Age Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent 0-4 2,428 5.6% 2,626 4.9% 2,876 4.8% 5 - 9 3,087 7.1% 3,223 6.0% 3,442 5.8% 10 - 14 3,456 7.9% 3,585 6.7% 3,881 6.5% 15 - 19 3,352 7.7% 3,276 6.1% 3,513 5.9% 20 - 24 2,031 4.7% 2,481 4.7% 2,342 3.9% 25 - 34 4,289 9.9% 5,825 10.9% 6,332 10.6% 35 - 44 6,516 15.0% 6,739 12.6% 7,871 13.2% 45 - 54 6,631 15.2% 6,944 13.0% 7,056 11.8% 55 - 64 5,217 12.0% 7,569 14.2% 8,127 13.6% 65 - 74 4,306 9.9% 7,099 13.3% 8,761 14.7% 75 - 84 1,828 4.2% 3,243 6.1% 4,515 7.6% 854 351 0.8% 727 1.4% 990 1.7% Census 2010 2019 2024 Race andEthricNy Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent White Alone 36,346 88.2% 45,884 86.0% 50,444 84.5% Black Alone 1,975 4.5% 2,808 5.3% 3,539 5.9°Po American Indian Alone 124 0.3% 146 0.3% 175 0.3% Asian Alone 730 1.7% 1,205 2.3% 1,596 2.7% Pacific Islander Alone 11 1 17 0-0% 23 0.0% Some Other Race Alone 1,470 3.4 % 2,076 3.9% 2,513 4.2% Two or More Races 835 1.9% 1,200 2.2% 1,419 2.4% Hispanic Origin (Any Race) 11,151 25.6% 15,508 29.1% 19,153 32.1% Data Note: Income is expressed In current dollars. Source: U.S. Co- Bureau, Census 2010 Summary Flo 1. Fsrl fion scz for 2019 end 2024. June 22, 2020 Source: ESRI and U.S. Census Bureau E 1.2 In order to determine commercial demand coming from the 15-minute drive time market area, it is important to determine the ratio between the overall County population and the population in the 15-minute drive time market area. In 2010, the population in the 15-minute drive time market area was 41,495, which was 12.86% of the County population. That percent increased to 14.38% of the County population in 2015. That one and a half percent increase is an indication of the growth potential in the Northeast Naples area due to the large percentage of undeveloped land and the potential for population growth in that area versus the land constrained developed areas of the County. The Consultant conservatively estimates that the Northeast Naples percentage of County population will continue to increase along with the southeast and east County regions due to developable land availability. Therefore, the Consultant used a 1.5% increased growth factor for the future 15-minute drive time area population percentage of the overall County population as shown in Table 4 below. Table 4. 15-Minute Drive Time Population Forecast Year 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 Collier County GMD Population Forecast 383,166 416,607 --- --- --- --- 15-Minute Market Area Census Population 54,431 59,901 --- --- --- --- Share 14.21 % 14.38% 15.88% 17.38% 18.88% 20.38% Collier County GMD Population Forecast 446,284 484,017 524,939 569,322 15-Minute Market Area Census Population 70,862 84,114 99,100 116,018 Source: Collier County Comprehensive Planning Section, U.S. Census Bureau and ESRI MARKET ANALYSIS Market Area Demand The most reliable indicator of commercial market demand in the County is to determine the amount of commercial square footage built in the County then divide that total amount by the County population to arrive at square feet per capita (person) in the existing market. Historical commercial development in relation to population growth encompasses all aspects of land development over time including geography, economic fluctuations and various commercial uses as they relate to market demographics. 7 Collier County in particular has shown a propensity for commercial development to follow residential development as the primary economic drivers are tourism, agriculture and real estate construction. The limited economic diversification fuels residential development, which then supports commercial development as peoples moving into the County require goods and services. Therefore, the commercial square feet per capita measure takes into account all of the factors previously mentioned. The Consultant utilized the 2014 commercial inventory spreadsheets by planning area as provided by the Collier County Comprehensive Planning Section ("CCCPS") to determine the total amount of commercial square footage built in the County as of 2014. Acreage not built upon was not used in this calculation. In order to make an accurate calculation, the Consultant then used the 2014 Collier County population from the CCCPS to match the supply data and calculate the commercial square footage per capita in the County. The Commercial square foot demand per capita in Collier County is 78.22 as shown in Table 5 below. Table 5. Collier County Per Capita Commercial Square Feet Demand Collier County Planning Area 2014 Square Feet Immokalee Area 2,355,554 Marco Island 158,081 Central Naples 2,732,949 Corkscrew 70,748 East Naples 4,244,976 Golden Gate 1,574,301 North Naples 9,726,289 Royal Fakapalm 522,764 Rural Estates 452,781 South Naples 2,277,828 Urban Estates 2,500,631 26,616,902 2015 Population 340,293 (October 1st Fiscal Year) Demand in Square Feet: 78.22 Source: Collier County Comprehensive Planning Section 10 To further refine the demand numbers for the Subject Property's particular market area, the Consultant used the 2014 commercial inventory spreadsheet for the Rural Estate and Urban Estates Planning Areas that are covered by the Subject Property's drive time area. The drive time area is located within approximately 70% of the Rural Estates and 30% of the Urban Estates. The Consultant then took 70% of the Rural Estates existing commercial square footage and 30% of the Urban Estates square footage, added them together and divided by the drive time population thus yielding a demand of 22.29 square feet of commercial space per capita as shown in Table 6 below. Table 6. Subject Property Drive Time Per Capita Commercial Sq. Ft. Demand Collier County Planning Area 2014 Sq. Ft. Percent Drive Time Sq. Ft. Rural Estates 452,781 70.00% 316,947 Urban Estates 2,500,631 30.00% 750,189 1,067,136 2015 Drive Time Area Population: 47,867 Per Capita Commercial Square Feet Demand: 22.29 Source: Collier County Comprehensive Planning Section and U.S. Census Bureau With the 15-minute drive time market area estimated population and the commercial demand in square -feet per capita determined, the Consultant calculated the estimated commercial square footage demand for the 15-minute drive time market area through the year 2045 as shown in Table 7 below. Table 7. Subject Property Drive Time Per Capita Commercial Sq. Ft. Demand 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 County Population 383,166 416,607 446,284 484,017 524,939 569,322 15-Minute Drive Time Population 54,431 59,901 70,862 84,114 99,100 116,018 Demand Square Feet Per Capita 22.29 22.29 22.29 22.29 22.29 22.29 Commercial Square Feet Demand 1,213,473 1,335,420 1,579,788 1,875,216 2,209,305 2,586,484 Source: Collier County Comprehensive Planning Section and the Consultant Market Area Supply The next step in the commercial needs analysis is to determine the amount of existing and potential competing commercial square footage in the 15-minumte drive time market area. The Consultant performed a three-part process in the ARCgis desktop program to determine both the existing and potential competing commercial parcels that would be used in the analysis. The first step in the process is to join all of the Collier County Property Appraiser data with the ARCgis program. The second step is to join the 15- minute drive time market area overlay shape file with the Property Appraiser data. The final step is to join the Excel commercial inventory data obtained from Collier County Comprehensive Planning Staff with the 15-minute drive time market area. This last step required joining the Rural Estates Planning Area and Urban Estates Planning Area Inventory spreadsheets with the 15-minute drive time market area since the drive time area encompassed portions of the two planning areas. All of the commercial parcels included or excluded within the 15-minute drive time market area are shown in Appendix Tables A through D at the end of this analysis. The Consultant then used a floor area ratio ("FAR") that consists of using all of the commercial square footage built in the drive time market area and dividing that by the developed acreage to obtain an average square footage per acre FAR that is indicative of the true market area supply being developed to meet the commercial demand being generated from the drive time market area. This FAR calculation was applied to the vacant acreage so a total potential square foot supply could be calculated for the undeveloped commercial acreage. Table 8 below indicates the total amount of existing and potential commercial square feet in the 15-minute drive time market area. Table 8 — Existing and Potential Commercial Square Feet in Drive Time Market Parcels Acres Square Feet FAR Developed Commercial 33 114.54 725,404 6,333 Undeveloped Commercial 33 110.69 701,063 6,333 Totals 66 225.23 1,426,467 Source: Collier County Comprehensive Planning Section, Collier County Property Appraiser and ESRI ARCgis mapping system 12 Market Area Supply — Demand Analysis The final step in the Commercial Needs Analysis is to put the supply and demand calculations together in order to determine the oversupply or undersupply of commercial space in the 15-minute drive time area both with the current existing and potential commercial square footage and with the proposed project acreage being included in the supply totals. The Consultant also included the approved but not developed Orange Blossom Ranch commercial (200,000 sq. ft.), the recently approved River Grass commercial (80,000 sq. ft.) and Hyde Park commercial (45,000 sq. ft.) in the vacant square footage totals. Table 9 below shows that calculation. Table 9. Drive Time Demand -Supply Calculation Retail Demand (sq. ft.) 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 Demand Per GMD Commercial Inventory & Population Retail Supply Developed Vacant Total Supply Allocation Ratio 1,213,473 1,335,420 1,579,788 1,875,216 2,209,305 2,586,484 725,404 725,404 725,404 725,404 725,404 725,404 1,026,000 ------- ------- 1,026,000 ------- ------- 1,026,000 ------- ------- 1,026,000 ------- ------- 1,026,000 ------- ------- 1,026,000 ------- ------- 1,751,404 1,751,404 1,751,404 1,751,404 1,751,404 1,751,404 1.44 1.31 1.11 0.93 0.79 0.68 Source: Collier County Comprehensive Planning Section, Collier County Property Appraiser, ESRI ARCgis mapping system and the Consultant (Rest of page left intentionally blank) 13 Adding the proposed 10,000 square feet (150,000 square feet minus the transfer of existing approved square footage (140,000 square feet from Wilson Boulevard and Golden Gate Boulevard) of commercial space proposed for the Subject Property to the developed supply row is shown in Table 10 below. Table 10. Drive Time Demand -Supply Calculation with Subject Property Included Retail Demand (sq. ft.) 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 Demand Per GMD Commercial Inventory & Population 1,213,473 1,335,420 1,579,788 1,875,216 2,209,305 2,586,484 Retail Supply Developed 735,404 735,404 735,404 735,404 735,404 735,404 Vacant 1,026,000 ------- ------- 1,026,000 ------- ------- 1,026,000 ------- ------- 1,026,000 ------- ------- 1,026,000 ------- ------- 1,026,000 ------- ------- Total Supply 1,761,404 1,761,404 1,761,404 1,761,404 1,761,404 1,761,404 Allocation Ratio 1.45 1.32 1.12 0.94 0.80 0.68 Source: Collier County Comprehensive Planning Section, Collier County Property Appraiser, ESRI ARCgis mapping system and the Consultant The future demand generally looks out to the Comprehensive Plan's horizon year which is generally dependent on the jurisdiction's comprehensive plan and growth management plan horizon year requirements. In Collier County's case, the Comprehensive Plan's horizon year is 2030 or 10 years in the future. It is at this point of the analysis that has caused an anomaly in determining a true economic supply and demand result. On the supply side, it is relatively easy to determine the amount of existing and approved supply from the property appraiser data. The difficulty lies in the vacant non -approved potential lands. Collier County Staff requires the Applicant to take all of those lands that have a commercial overlay on them and include them as supply by putting a floor area ratio figure to the acreage. The issue becomes apparent when all of the lands that are not in the existing or approved category are included in the particular land use analysis. By putting all of the potential lands in the supply category, the assumption is that all of that land would be developed as that particular land use overlay and nothing else. 14 The flaw in that representation is all of those vacant approved parcels and parcels designated by the FLUM as having the potential to be developed as one use, which could be a non -competing or some other commercial use. The same parcels are also counted as competing supply when a commercial needs analysis is performed for another commercial use. Essentially, they are double counted in both analyses when they will actually be developed as the market demand dictates. A general economic principal states that all markets are efficient and that supply for the most part is generated as demand dictates. It is a rare situation where supply generates demand. The allocation ratio measures the amount of additional acreage required in relation to the directly utilized acreage to assure proper market functioning in the sale, usage and allocation of land. The additional acreage is required in order to maintain market level pricing and to account for the likelihood that certain lands will not be placed on the market for sale during the forecast horizon or may be subject to future environmental or other constraints. Thus, the lands allocated in the FLUM should be considerably greater than those that will actually be used or developed. Again, basic economic principals have shown that markets are efficient in terms of supply and demand and the ultimate lack of available commercial choices creates an impediment to the market functioning properly. One must also consider that not all of the office/commercial designation in the future land use map will be developed as such since the owners of those properties will only develop the land with uses that respond to market demand. The increased acres will maintain flexibility within the comprehensive plan, keep prices reasonable by not constraining land supply, and compensate for lands which may be unavailable for sale or subject to environmental or other development constraints. Growth management practices have suggested that the greater the time horizon of the comprehensive plan, the greater the allocation ratio needed to maintain flexibility of the comprehensive plan. Other factors that influence the residential acreage allocation ratio are the nature and speed of the developing area and the area's general exposure to growth trends in the market. The Consultant believes that to ensure proper flexibility in the comprehensive plan of a rapidly growing county like Collier, a commercial allocation ratio in the range of 1.25 to 1.5 is necessary to maintain planning flexibility and to account for the double counting of land uses. 15 History has shown that the former Florida Department of Community Affairs ("DCA") (Currently the Florida Department of Economic Opportunity) ("DEO") recommended an allocation ratio of 1.25 in the horizon year of a comprehensive plan yet it had seen and approved allocation ratios in the 1.8 to 2.4 range and in some cases even larger allocation ratios for longer forecast horizons. Otherwise, if allocation ratios are not used in the analysis, then an appropriate breakdown of the potential lands between the various land use types needs to be undertaken in order to more accurately analyze the need for a comprehensive land use change. 1.3 CONCLUSIONS The Consultant used all of the data and analysis in the previous sections to determine the total supply and demand for commercial space in the Subject Property's market area from 2020 through 2045. The results show that the addition of the Subject Property to the Collier County commercial inventory will not adversely affect the balance of commercial supply in the 15-minute drive time area. The Allocation Ratio is 1.12 in the Collier County Comprehensive Plan 2030 horizon year with the addition of the Subject Property which is below the recommended 1.25 allocation ratio as suggested by the former Florida DCA now Florida DEO. The 1.12 allocation ratio in 2030 is 0.03 below the constricting 1.15 ratio the County has used as a measuring stick. Another point to consider is that as this area develops, the population will increase significantly as other areas of the County reach full development and therefore the supply will need to be increased to reach the overriding demand from this growth. This area will rapidly trend toward the County -wide per capita square foot demand of 78.22 square feet. If the 78.22 square feet per capita calculation is used in this analysis, then the allocation ratio would be 0.33 in the horizon year of 2030. That is also economically unfeasible. The Consultant believes that the square foot per capita figure will increase in time over the building out of the rural estates and urban estates and would increase rather than remain a constant. Finally, while the total existing and potential commercial supply exceeds the demand, the potential supply makes up just under 50% of the total future supply in the 15-minute drive time area. Markets are efficient and the future supply will be developed as the market grows and diversifies. However, the future supply will be exhausted as it related to future demand just after 2030 so it is imperative that the future of the commercial supply in this 15-minute drive time market area needs to increase to accommodate the future demand. 16 2.0 RESIDENTIAL MARKET ANALYSIS 2.1 Proposed Product Market Impact Analysis The Subject Project is proposing the development of 400 residential units on the Subject Property. Those units would consist of single-family, duplex, multi -family or townhome dwelling units, group housing for seniors, model homes/sales or leasing offices and/or any other principal use, which is comparable in nature with the forgoing list of permitted principal uses, as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals or the Collier County Hearing Examiner. The Subject Property has the potential to be developed as a mixed - use commercial center. The Consultant reviewed the requested unit types and the Collier County market for those unit types to determine the potential effect those units will have on the total single-family and multi -family market supplies. Although the potential market for 400 residential units was analyzed, the Consultant recognizes that 400 low density single family residential units will not fit on the property. In order to determine the impact of the proposed units would have on the Collier County market for those products. The Consultant utilized data provided by Metrostudy, Inc. from the 1st quarter of 2020, the most current data available at the time of this report. That data is shown in Appendix E for single-family and multi -family product. Current Single -Family Market Conditions The current 1st Quarter market conditions for Collier County single-family is based on rolling quarterly averages and shows that there are currently 2,138 annual single-family starts and 1,968 annual closings. Market forces are considered to be in equilibrium in that the laws of supply and demand determine the amount of condominium unit inventory to address the demand for those units. Current market conditions dictate that the market requires 170 units over the demand for those units to keep the market in equilibrium. Table 11 below taken from Appendix E shows those figures. Table 11. Current Collier County Single -Family Market Conditions Market Conditions - 1st Quarter 2020 1 Annual Starts 2,138 Annual Closings 1,968 Annual Added lnventoryforStabilization 170 Vacant Developed Lots 3,954 Vacant Developed Lots Supply (Months) 22.2 Source: MetroStudy Report, 1st Quarter 2020 Table 11 also shows the inventory is also comprised of 3,954 vacant developed single- family lots which is a 22.2-month supply. Based on the 2,138 annual single-family starts and if the market stays constant, the Collier County inventory of single-family homesites will increase to 5,314 by the year 2027 as shown in Table 12 below. Table 12. Future Collier County Single -Family Market Inventory 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 Vacant Developed Lots 3,954 4,124 4,294 4,464 4,634 4,804 4,974 5,144 Annual Starts 2,138 2,138 2,138 2,138 2,138 2,138 2,138 2,138 Annual Closings 1,968 1,968 1,968 1,968 1,968 1,968 1,968 1,968 Remaining Vacant Developed Lots 4,124 4,294 4,464 4,634 4,804 4,974 5,144 5,314 Project Units 0 0 0 0 0 Percent Increase 4.12% 3.96% 3.81% 3.67% 3.54% 3.42% 3.30% Source: MetroStudy Report, 1 st Quarter 2020 The approval of the Project's 400 single-family homesites will increase the future inventory by 1.70% by 2026 as shown in Table 13 below. Table 13. Collier County Single -Family Market Inventory with Subject Site Units Added 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 Vacant Developed Lots 3,954 4,124 4,294 4,514 4,734 5,004 5,274 5,544 Annual Starts 2,138 2,138 2,188 2,188 2,238 2,238 2,238 2,138 Annual Closings 1,968 1,968 1,968 1,968 1,968 1,968 1,968 1,968 Remaining Vacant Developed Lots 4,124 4,294 4,514 4,734 5,004 5,274 5,544 5,714 Project Units 50 50 100 100 100 Percent Increase 4.12% 5.12% 4.87% 5.70% 5.40% 5.12% 3.07% Source: MetroStudy Report, 1st Quarter 2020 and Consultant The current data indicates that the Project's 400 single-family homesites will negligibly increase the Collier County available residential single-family homesite market by 1.7% in 2027. That increase is shown without an increase in annual demand from now to 2027. The projected future growth of Collier County will increase the current annual demand for single family homesites and diminish the available supply therefore more than demonstrates the need for the Subject Property's proposed single family homesites. 2.2 Current Condominium Market Conditions Like single-family market data, the current 1 St Quarter market conditions for Collier County condominiums is based on rolling quarterly averages and shows that there are currently 558 annual condominium starts and 387 annual closings. Again, market forces are considered to be in equilibrium in that the laws of supply and demand determine the amount of condominium unit inventory to address the demand for those units. Current market conditions dictate that the market requires 171 units over the demand for those units to keep the market in equilibrium. Table 14 below taken from Appendix E shows those figures. Table 14. Current Collier County Multi -Family Market Conditions Market Conditions - 1st Quarter 2020 Annual Starts 558 Annual Closings 387 Annual Added Inventory for Stabilization 171 Vacant Developed Units 1,060 Future Inventory 2,061 Vacant Developed Units Supply (Months) 22.8 Total Units Supply (Months) 44.3 Total Units Inventory 67.12 Source: MetroStudy Report, 1 st Quarter 2020 Table 14 also shows the inventory is also comprised of 1,060 vacant developed condominium units (not necessarily built — could be in planning and permitting stages) and 2,061 future condominium units. Those units combined total 3,121 vacant and future units. Based on 558 annual condominium unit starts, the Collier County inventory of condominium units will be depleted by the year 2525 as shown in Table 15 below. Table 15. Future Collier County Multi -Family Market Inventory Vacant Developed Units Annual Starts Remaining Vacant Developed Units Future Inventory 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 1,060 673 558 558 558 558 558 558 558 558 558 558 558 558 502 115 0 0 0 0 0 2,061 2,005 1,447 889 331 -227 -785 Source: MetroStudy Report, 1 st Quarter 2020 When the Project's 400 units are added to the future inventory, they push the inventory depletion year out one year to 2026. The approval of the Project's 400 condominium units will increase the future inventory by 21.7% in that year and will prolong the provision of available units by one year as shown in Table 16 on the next page. 19 Table 16. Collier County Multi -Family Market Inventory with Subject Site Units Added 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 Vacant Developed Units 1,060 673 558 558 558 558 558 Annual Starts 558 558 558 558 558 558 558 Remaining Vacant Developed Units 502 115 0 0 0 0 0 Future Inventory 2,061 2,005 1,847 1,289 731 173 -385 Project Units 400 Source: MetroStudy Report, 1st Quarter 2020 and Consultant The data indicates that the Project's 400 units will not adversely affect the Collier County residential condominium market and address the future demand for condominium units in Collier County thus prolonging the market for an additional year. 3.0 Potential Apartment Development The Client is also considering developing the proposed 400 residential units as apartments. The Consultant performed the following analysis on the Collier County apartment market to determine how the proposed 400 residential units would affect the apartment market if they are developed as apartments. Market Area Definition In previous pre -application meetings with County Staff, the Consultant agreed with Staff that apartment needs analysis market areas should follow the urban services boundary area which is a mile east of Collier Boulevard (CR 951) and would include all of the urban area of the County. Due to the location of the Subject Property being further east of the urban services boundary, the Consultant utilized the ESRI Business Analyst GIS program expanded the boundaries of the Subject Site's market area to include the Subject Property and all potential apartment complexes located therein. Figure 3.0 on the next page depicts the market area from the Subject Property. 20 Figure 3.0 Subject Property Market Area Source: ESRI ArcGIS Business Analyst Mapping System Market Area Demographic Detail Table 17 below shows the 2010 U.S. Census demographic profile of the population that lives within the 320.11 square -mile market area of the subject site. The remaining 2010 U.S. Census data can be found in Appendix F. It is important to note that the U.S. Census Bureau uses the Decennial Census as the basis for issuing their annual American Community Survey census data that is used in the demand section of this report. The 2020 ACS report was the most recent data source available at the time of this report. 21 Table 17 Qesri- 2010 Census Profile 5 Area: 320.11 square miles Prepared by E5r[ 2000-2010 2000 2010 Annual Rate Population 197,343 249,398 2.37% Households 83,426 107,058 2.53 % Housing Units 113,765 155,306 3.16% Population by Race Number Percent Total 249,398 100.0% Population Reporting One Race 244,907 98.2% White 215,241 86.3% Black 15,101 6.1 % American Indian 731 0.3% Asian 2,963 1.2% Pacific Islander 72 0.0% Some Other Race 10,799 4.3 % Population Reporting Two or More Races 4,491 1.8% Total Hispanic Population SS,348 22.2% Population by Sex Male 121,552 48.7 % Female 127,846 S1.3% Population by Age Total 249,401 100.0% Age 0 - 4 12,254 4.9 % Age 5 - 9 12,778 5.1% Age 10 - 14 12,951 5.21% Age IS- 19 12,932 5.20% Age 20 - 24 11,300 4.5% Age 25 - 29 12,329 4.9 % Age 30 - 34 12,084 4.8% Age 35 - 39 12,929 5.21% Age 40 - 44 14,563 5.8% Age 45 - 49 16,479 6.6% Age 50 - 54 15,917 6.40k Age 55 - 59 15,815 6.3% Age 60 - 64 18,347 7.4% Age 65 - 69 19,710 7.9% Age 70 - 74 17,336 7.01% Age 75 - 79 13,746 5.51% Age 80 - 84 10,214 4.1% Age 85+ 7,713 3.1% Age 18+ 203,148 81.5% Age 65+ 68,719 27.61% Data Note: Hispanic population can be of any race. Census 2010 medians are Computed from reported data distributions. Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2010 Summary File 1. Esri converted Census 2000 data into 2010 geography. Source. ESRI and U.S. Census Bureau 22 Also important to the development of this apartment project is the location of businesses and subsequent employment centers located near the subject site. Figure 3.1 below shows businesses near the subject site with 50 or more employees that would benefit from having residential offerings available to their employees. Figure 3.1 Despite an economy that relies a great deal on real estate, construction and tourism, the industry mix for the Naples MSA is not severely out of line with U.S. averages. The shares of employment devoted to the Trade, Transportation & Utilities; Financial Activities; Information; and Education & Health Services industries are within about 100 basis points ("bps") of the national norms. Figure 3.2 on the next page shows the industry mix within the Naples Metropolitan Statistical Area ("MSA"). 23 Figure 3.2 Naples MSA Industry Mix Mining & Government, 9.6% Construction, 9.6% Other SeR 6.4% LeFsure and Hospitality, 19.8% Edu. & Health Activities, 14.5% icturing, 2.6% Trade, Trans. & Utilities, 19.9% nformation, 1.0% ancial Activities, 5.5% Professional & Business, 11.1 % Source: Florida Agency for Workforce Innovation, Labor Market Statistics The largest differences from the national norms are in Leisure & Hospitality (+939 bps); Manufacturing (-592 bps); Professional & Business Services (-284 bps); Other Services (+249 bps); and Government (-596 bps). Given the number of wealthy retirees who make Naples at least their winter home, it is not surprising to see larger shares of employment in industries that cater to this population. Although the share of Health Services was not significantly different from the U.S. share, it has increased by about 200 bps since 1996. The increase of industries outside of construction and leisure/hospitality will continue to diversify the market economy and will continue to increase the median income leading to an increase in the demand for apartment living as a residential choice. Although the nearby employment hubs will provide a source of future residents, the demographics trends and lifestyle choices will also determine the subject site's demand potential. 24 3.1 Market Analysis Market Area Supply Shown below in Table 18 is the existing and developing apartment complexes located in Collier County. Table 18. Collier County Quarterly Rental Apartment Inventory Collier County Community and Human Services Division Quarterly Rental Apartment Inventory Survey April 2020 'Information deemed reliable but should be Property Name —I#of Units in D—laprnent Occupancy Rate Tots l Awlbble Dnitsas oflan 15, 211 Z11 mllcg Park 210 Wlndsong Mb 1. 100.0'h O Summer Lakes 1&2 416 100.0'b O Beer Creek — lOO.O'i o Saddlebr.. k Village 140 100- Q whl tiler's Green 172 Jasmin e Cay n, response Ospreys Landing 176 1— 1 Villas of Capri — 92- 17 INs[IersCwe 2- 100.0'b o Noeh'S Landing 264 lOO.O'i o Tu scan Isle 29. 100.0'b O Bay.92 99— Naples Place l-III — 9— 1 Brl ar Landings 2- — 2 George Carver Apt, ]O 1OO.O'b O Th e Point at Napl-IHemn Park) 248 96.4.1 9 eadow Brook Preserve Mer Sol ell 329 92- 23 —dey Place Alden lY Aventine 30 95,1°h 17 Somerset Palms 169 92- 13 Oasis Naples 216 1OO.O'i O AN,- at Golden GatefSabal Key 21J 9— 16 Lely Resort nssplra Apartments 3J4 90,1% 3J M eadow Lakes 252 13W 17 River Reach 556 9J, 9'b 52 Al,- at Luna Bay 956 .9.— 49 51 err3 G Yand.at Naples — 92,— 24 Belvedere At' Quail Run 162 97.596 4 hnnano Lakes The Springs at Ha mmock C— - 72— 14 Bermu des Island 3fD 96.4°b 13 M hbu lakes 36 969'b 12 Orchid Run 262 Sl.]°b 14 Add— Place 294 99,9'i 15 A,—Gulfshore — 90.8^b 39 —ige Go odlette Arms 242 100.0'h O N aples 11 1.2 91.5?6 1fi WII d Pi n es of Naples 1&2 — 100— O Berkshl re ReserveI—Ii dN.,[-` 146 17W 4 Springs at Sable Bay 340 Pine Rieke Commons 3]5 urthouseshadows Allures 3 ock Park za Sub -Total Naples 12,152 94.5% SS} Heritage Villas 41 9J.2°b 4 Garden Lek. 6 9.5. 1 Sanders Pin es 41 100.0'b O Farm Worker Vlllce(non-farmworker) 276 9S°b 5 Willowbrook Place 41 95.1°b 2 vlll$e Summer Glenn 45 1-.— O Es pa ran za 47 100.0'b O Bromella Place 3J 100— O Southern Villas 35 97.1-1 1 oak HeJ en 1W --1 4 Eden Gardensl&2 92 96— 3 m okal.ee Apartments 19].G°b Cr-- rk 1&2 394 9 mbeRlce O Cypress Ru 3 1OOhL O sub Total I — I 1,A29 9S.p% 29 Grand Total 13,— 95. Pi — Source: Collier County Community and Human Services Division 25 The previous table shows a mixture of subsidized and market rate apartment complexes. For purposes of this study, the subsidized apartment complexes were removed along with the apartment complexes in Immokalee. Market Rate Apartments Market rate apartments were the first developed in the county, with subsidized housing starting in the late 1980's to accommodate the increasing employment for hotels and other hospitality related industries. There is a total of 12,152 market rate rental units in Collier County which accounts for 85.7% of the total. The increase in market rate apartment supply of 3- and 4-bedroom units did not begin until 2000 when the availability of affordable family accommodations was restricting due to rapidly rising home prices. Home prices are still on the rise, which continues to create a demand for the larger market rate apartment units. Most of the market rate rental apartment communities are located on major arterial roadways allowing for easy access to a wider market area. Market rate rental apartment complexes prefer to be located closer to employment centers, entertainment venues and other support facilities to attract tenants. Average occupancy rate for market rate apartments has been hovering around 95% for the past five years, which is indicative of a very tight under -supplied rental market. Table 19 on the next page shows the market rate apartment complexes that are used in this report. (Rest of Page left Intentionally Blank) 26 Table 19. Collier County Market Rate Apartment Complexes Property Name o a Or Units in Occupancy Rate Total Available Units as of Jan College Park 210 97.1% 6 Windsong Club 120 100.0% 0 Summer Lakes 1&2 416 100.0% 0 Bear Creek 108 100.0% 0 Saddlebrook Village 140 100.0% 0 W hi st I er's Green 168 100.0% 0 Jasmine Cay 72 no response Osprey's Landing 176 99.4% 1 Villas of Capri 235 92.8°% 17 Whistler's Cove 240 100.0% 0 Noah's Landing 264 100.0% 0 Tuscan Isle 298 100.0% 0 Brittany Bay 392 99.0% 4 Naples Place 1-III 170 99.4°% 1 Briar Landings 240 99.2% 2 George Carver Apts 70 100.0% 0 The Point at Naples (Heron Park) 248 96.4°% 9 M eadow Brook Preserve 268 95.9% 11 M er Soleil 320 92.8°% 23 Waverley Place 300 98% 7 Advenir Aventine 350 95.1% 17 Somerset Palms 169 92.3°% 13 Oasis Naples 216 100.0°% 0 AlVistaat GoldenGate/Saba Key 200 92.0°% 16 Aster at Lely Resort 308 93.8% 19 Inspira Apartments 304 90.1% 30 M eadow Lakes 252 93.3°% 17 River Reach 556 90.6% 52 Alvista at Laguna Bay 456 89.3°% 49 Sierra Grande at Naples 300 92.0% 24 Belvedere At Quail Run 162 97.5% 4 M ilano Lakes 296 62.5°% 111 The Springs at Hammock Cove 50 72.0% 14 Bermuda Island 360 96.4°% 13 M alibu Lakes 356 96.6°% 12 Orchid Run 262 94.7% 14 Addison Place 294 94.9°% 15 AriumGulfshore 368 90.8% 34 Laurel Ridge 78 100.0% 0 Goodlette Arms 242 100.0% 0 Naples 701 188 91.5% 16 Wild Pines of Naples 1&2 200 100.0% 0 Berkshire Reserve (Daili of Naples) 146 97.3% 4 Springs at Sable Bay 340 Pine Ridge Commons 375 Courthouse Shadows 300 Allura 304 Hammock Park 265 265 The Haldeman (Pelican Apartments) 400 Sub -Total Naples 12,552 94.8% 1 551 Source: Collier County Community and Human Services Division 27 The total apartment unit supply in Collier County is currently 12,552 using both the existing apartments and apartments under construction. The aging of market rate apartments must also be considered. Over 50% of the market rate apartments in Collier County are more than 20 years old. A national report by Apartmentlist.com noted that the balance of new and old units affects the rents being charged. The report stated the percentage of rental units less than 10 years old is at an all-time low in the Naples area. The report also shows that rentals over 30 years old increased 33% from 2000 to 2016 while buildings aged out so that the share of rentals 10 years old or less declined by 26%. The result of the study is that the cost of renting a house or apartment isn't likely to go down in older units until there are enough new ones coming into the market to replace them. Note Appendix G where the report was noted in the Naples Daily News editorial September 7, 2018. Chart 3.0 below shows the number of apartment units that were brought on line by year in Collier County since 1975. Chart 3.0 Apartments Built by Year in Collier County Total Apartment Units Buiit by Year 7 D0 60O 5 DO 4 DO o1l1llililllll 1975 1996 1599 1989 1590 1991 1995 1993 2CC0 2001 2002 2014 2015 2017 2019 Source: Collier County Property Appraiser Market Area Demand The first step in determining market demand is to start with the current population of the apartment market area. The market area covers many Collier County planning areas and bisects a few of them. So, in order to determine an accurate population forecast for the apartment market area, the Consultant utilized the American Community Survey ("ACS") which is the annual update to the 2010 Census performed the by the US Census Bureau. The ACS is an ongoing survey that provides vital information on a yearly basis about our nation and its people. Information from the survey generates data that help determine how more than $675 billion in federal and state funds are distributed each year. Table 20 on the next page is the 2020 ACS Collier County housing profile. This table is the updated ACS survey for the 320.11 square mile market area. It shows the current population for this market area is 297,813. The ACS survey also estimates the same data in the report for 2025, which matches the County's 5-year planning horizon. ACS estimates that the market area population will be 324,003 in 2025. The census annual percent growth of 1.70% was used to calculate the annual population from 2020 to 2025. (Rest of Page left Intentionally Blank) 29 Table 20. 2020 Collier County Housing Profile Qesri, Housing Profile Polygon 5 Prepared by Esri Area: 320.11 square miles Population Households 2D10 Total Population 249,398 2020 Median Household Income $71,675 2020 Total Population 297813 2025 Median Household Income $78,424 2D25 Total Population 324:003 2020-2025 Annual Rate 1-82% 2020-2025 Annual Rate 1.701/n Census 2010 2020 2025 Housing Units by Occupancy Status and Tenure Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Total Housing Units 155,306 100.0% 184,415 100.0% 200,089 100.0% Occupied 107,058 68.9% 129,054 70.0% 140,833 70.4% Owner 77,202 49.7% 92,491 50.2% 100,892 50A1% Renter 29,856 19.20/ 36,563 19.8% 39,941 20.0% Vacant 48,243 31.1% 55,362 30.0% 59,256 29.6% 2020 2025 Owner Occupied Housing Units by Value Number Percent Number Percent Total 92,492 100.0% 100,893 100.01h a$50,O00 1,518 1.6% 892 0.9% $50,000-$99,999 1,822 2.0% 1,010 1.0% $100,000-$149,999 4,188 4.5% 2,76D 2.7% $150,000-$199,999 6,914 7.5% 5,577 5.51% $200,000-$249,999 10,042 10.9% 9,994 9.9% $250,000-$299,999 9,789 10.6% 11,034 10.9% $300,000-$399,999 17,294 18.7% 20,835 20.7% $400,000-$499,999 10,674 11.5% 13,092 13.0% $500,000-$749,999 14,187 15.3% 17,172 17.01/ $750,000-$999,999 5,686 6.1% 6,707 6.6% $1,000,000-$1,499,999 4,221 4.6% 4,861 4.8% $1,500,000-$1,999,999 2,028 2.2% 2,334 2.3% $2,000,000+ 4,129 4.5°! 4,625 4.6°/ Median Value $369,232 $392,054 Average Value $537,055 $565,488 Census 2010 Housing Units Number Percent Total 155,306 100.0% In Urbanized Areas 146,374 94.2% In Urban Clusters 2,199 1.40!6 Rural Housing Units 6,733 4.3% source: U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2010 Summary File 1. Esri forecasts for 2020 and 2025. Source: U.S. Census Bureau Table 20 also shows that the percent of renter occupied housing units is 19.8% in 2020 and increases to 20.0% in 2025. That is an increase of 0.0004% annually and is used in the calculation of the market area demand. Table 21 on the next page establishes the household income and corresponding monthly rental payment. The median household income in Collier County in 2020 is $71,675. The table shows the income ranges that are used in the calculation of demand. 30 Table 21. Monthly Rental Payment Calculations Household Income $30,000 40,000 50,000 60,000 63,202 70,000 80,000 90,000 100,000 Median Household Income: $71,675 Monthly Household Income $2,500 3,333 4,167 5,000 5,267 5,833 6,667 7,500 8,333 Monthly Rental Payment @ 30% $750 1,000 1,250 1,500 1,580 1,750 2,000 2,250 2,500 Source: The Consultant The percent of households by income is shown in Table 22 on the next page. The percentage of households in the up to $100,000 category ranges from the current 64.8% to 60.8% in 2025. That is a reduction of 0.008% annually and is used in the calculation of the market area demand. (Rest of Page left Intentionally Blank) 31 Table 22. Apartment Study Market Area Demographic and Income Profile 4esri, Demographic .. Income Profile Polygon 5 Prepared by Esri Area: 320.11 square miles Summary Census 2010 2020 2025 Population 249,398 297,813 324,003 Households 107,058 129,054 140,833 Families 70,516 84,082 91,455 Average Household Size 2.31 2.29 2.28 Owner Occupied Housing Units 77,202 92,491 100,992 Renter Occupied Housing Units 29,856 36,563 39,941 Median Age 48.2 52.2 53.6 Trends:2O2O-2025 Annual Rate Area State National Population 1.70% 1.33% 0.721A Households 1.76% 1.27% 0.72% Families 1.70% 1.23% 0.64% Owner HHs 1.75% 1.221% 0.72% Median Household Income 1.82% 1.51% 1.600/ 2020 2025 Households by Income Number Percent Number Percent <$15,000 9,018 7.00/n 8,541 6.1% $15,000 - $24,999 8,979 7.01/a 8,685 6.2% $25,000 - $34,999 9,779 7.6% 9,627 6.8% $35,000 - $49,999 17,086 13.2% 17,323 12.3% $50,000- $74,999 21,791 16.9% 23,007 16.3% $75,000 - $99,999 16,895 13.1% 18,505 13.1% $100,000 - $149,999 18,364 14.2% 21,338 15.2% $160,000 - $199,999 10,787 8.41h 13,624 9.7% $200,000+ 16,355 12.7% 20,184 14.3% Median Household Income $71,675 $78,424 Average Household Income $109,635 $122,180 Per Capita Income $47,455 $53,029 Census 2010 2020 2025 Population by Age Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent 0-4 12,254 4.9% 12,835 4.31/a 13,839 4.3% 5 - 9 12,778 5.1% 13,741 4.6v/ 14,509 4.5% 10 - 14 12,951 5.2% 14,436 4.8% 15,438 4.8% 15 - 19 12,932 5.2% 13,352 4.5% 14,374 4.4% 20 - 24 11,300 4.5 % 12,763 4.3% 12,672 3.9% 25 - 34 24,413 9.8% 29,828 10.0% 30,457 9.4% 35 - 44 27,492 11.0% 29,353 9.9% 33,576 10.4% 45 - 54 32,396 13.01% 32,262 10.8% 31,769 9.8% 55 - 64 34,162 13.7% 43,535 14.6% 44,653 13.8% 65 - 74 37,046 14.9% 49,471 16.61/. 56,400 17.41/n 75 - 84 23,960 9.6% 33,138 11.1% 41,079 12.7% 85+ 7,713 3.11/6 13,098 4.4% 15,237 4.7% Census 2010 2020 2025 Race and Ethnicity Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent White Alone 215,241 86.31/a 250,187 84.01% 268,013 82.7% Black Alone 15,101 6.1% 20,440 6.91% 24,051 7.4% American Indian Alone 731 0.3% 844 0.3% 924 0.3% Asian Alone 2,963 1.2% 5,010 1.7% 6,537 2.0% Pacific Islander Alone 72 0.0% 118 0.0% 143 0.0% Some Other Race Alone 10,799 4.30/4 15,012 5.0% 17,294 5.3% Two or More Races 4,491 1.8% 6,201 2.1% 7,042 2.2% Hispanic Origin (Any Race) 55,348 22.2% 75,733 25.4% 89,381 27.6% Data Note: Income is expressed in current dollars. Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2010 Summary File 1. Esd forecasts for 2320 and 2025. Source: U.S. Census Bureau 32 Table 23 below shows the renter -occupied housing units by contract rent. The number of units in the $800 to $1,999 range is 21,582. That is 74.71 % of the 28,886 total cash rent units and is used in the calculation of the apartment market area demand. That data range is highly reliable data according to ACS. Table 23. Apartment Study Market Area Housing Summary • GesruACS Polygon 5 Area: 320.11 square miles Housing Summary Prepared by Esri 2014-2018 ACS Estimate Percent MOE(f) RENTER -OCCUPIED HOUSING UNITS BY CONTRACT RENT Total 30,541 100.0% 1,154 With cash rent 26,886 94.61/o 1,129 Less than $100 94 0.3% 71 $100 to $149 22 0.10/0 23 $150 to $199 22 0.11/0 27 $200 to $249 303 1.0% 151 $250 to $299 94 0.31/o 75 $300 to $349 206 0.7% 126 $350 to $399 141 0.5% 145 $400 to $449 53 0.2% 61 $450 to $499 89 0.3% 68 $500 to $549 470 1.5% 199 $550 to $599 62 0.2% 42 $600 to $649 257 0.8% 157 $650 to $699 437 1.4% 153 $700 to $749 821 2.7% 242 $750 to $799 1,316 4.3% 264 $800 to $899 2,811 9.21/o 396 $900 to $999 4,208 13.81/o 553 $1,000 to $1,249 6,184 20,21/6 614 $1,250 to $1,499 4,908 16.1% 558 $1,500 to $1,999 3,471 11.40% 476 $2,000 to $2,499 1,341 4.4% 287 $2,500 to $2,999 526 1.71/o 192 $3,000 to $3,499 502 1.6% 187 $3,500 or more 548 1.81/0 194 No cash rent 1,654 5.41/o 293 Median Contract Rent $1,123 N/A Average Contract Rent N/A N/A RENTER -OCCUPIED HOUSING UNITS BY INCLUSION OF UTILITIES IN RENT Total 30,541 100.01/0 1,154 Pay extra for one or more utilities 26,969 88.31/o 1,101 No extra payment for any utilities 3,572 11.7% 410 Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2014-2018 American Community Survey Source: U.S. Census Bureau 33 Table 24 below shows the apartment study market area demand calculation using the date points previously explained in Tables 19 through 22. The population is increased annually. The percent of rental households were reduced annually and multiplied with the corresponding annual households to obtain the annual rental households. The rental households were then multiplied by the percentage of households with incomes up to $100,000 range. That calculation establishes the annual demand for market rate rental housing units in the market area. That annual number is then multiplied by the percent of rental units with rents in the $800 to $1,999 range to establish the demand for market rate apartment units. That demand is slowly increasing over the next five years. Table 24 Apartment Study Market Area Demand Calculation With % of Units Total Percent Rental Income up to Annual with rent Unit Year Population Households Rental Households $100k Demand $800-$1,900 Demand 2020 297,813 129,054 19.8% 25,553 64.8% 16,558 74.71% 12,371 2021 303,051 131,410 19.8% 26,072 64.0% 16,686 74.71% 12,467 2022 308,289 133,766 19.9% 26,593 63.2% 16,807 74.71% 12,557 2023 313,527 136,121 19.9% 27,115 62.4% 16,920 74.71% 12,642 2024 318,765 138,477 20.0% 27,640 61.6% 17,026 74.71% 12,721 2025 324,003 140,833 20.0% 28,167 60.8% 17,125 74.71% 12,795 Sources: U.S. Census Bureau and the Consultant Table 25 on the next page shows the same market area demand calculation from Table 24 above and adds the existing market rate apartments and the future apartment complexes in the development process shown in Table 19. The Table establishes that there is a current surplus of 181 market rate apartments in the market area and falling to a deficit of 243 market rate apartments in 2025. 34 Table 25. Apartment Study Market Area Supply - Demand Analysis %With %of Units Income with rent Total Percent Rental up to Annual $800- Unit Surplus/Deficit Year Population Households Rental Households $100k Demand $1,900 Demand Market Supply Units 2020 297,813 129,054 19.8% 25,553 64.8% 16,558 74.71% 12,371 12,552 181 2021 303,051 131,410 19.8% 26,072 64.0% 16,686 74.71% 12,467 12,552 85 2022 308,289 133,766 19.9% 26,593 63.2% 16,807 74.71% 12,557 12,552 -5 2023 313,527 136,121 19.9% 27,115 62.4% 16,920 74.71% 12,642 12,552 -90 2024 318,765 138,477 20.0% 27,640 61.6% 17,026 74.71% 12,721 12,552 -169 2025 324,003 140,833 20.0% 28,167 60.8% 17,125 74.71% 12,795 12,552 -243 Source: Collier County Comprehensive Planning Section, Collier County Property Appraiser, ESRI ARCgis mapping system and the Consultant Adding the proposed 400 proposed apartment units to the market supply (the units would most likely be added in 2023) will still show a slight surplus of market rate rental units in the horizon year of 2025 as shown in Table 26 below. Table 26. Apartment Study Market Area Supply - Demand Analysis with Subject Property Units Included % With % of Units Market Income with rent Supply with Total Percent Rental $30k- Annual $800- Unit Market Subject Surplus/Deficit Year Population Households Rental Households $99k Demand $1,900 Demand Supply Property Units 2020 297,813 129,054 19.8% 25,553 64.8% 16,558 74.71% 12,371 12,152 12,552 181 2021 303,051 131,410 19.8% 26,072 64.0% 16,686 74.71% 12,467 12,152 12,552 85 2022 308,289 133,766 19.9% 26,593 63.2% 16,807 74.71% 12,557 12,152 12,552 -5 2023 313,527 136,121 19.9% 27,115 62.4% 16,920 74.71% 12,642 12,152 12,952 310 2024 318,765 138,477 20.0% 27,640 61.6% 17,026 74.71% 12,721 12,152 12,952 231 2025 324,003 140,833 20.0% 28,167 60.8% 17,125 74.71% 12,795 12,152 12,952 157 Source: Collier County Comprehensive Planning Section, Collier County Property Appraiser, ESRI ARCgis mapping system and the Consultant 3.2 CONCLUSION The Consultant used all of the data and analysis in the previous sections to determine that the total supply of market rate apartments will turn negative in 2022. With the addition of the Subject Site's 400 apartment units in 2023, there will be a minimal surplus through 2025. However, economic and financial principles would warrant the construction of the units to accommodate the demand to bring the market back to equilibrium and it would not be financial feasible to construct the apartment buildings one at a time and not take advantage of employment and materials staging. The analysis also shows that the addition of the Subject Property's proposed 400 apartment units will address the need for apartment units in 2022 and beyond as highlighted in Table 25 above. 35 APPENDICES 36 Appendix A 15-Minute Drive Time Developed Competing Commercial Parcels FID ACRES GIS O NAME1 LUSEDOR D BLDG SQFT 4293 1.05 CAMERON PARTNERS LLC Store (One Story) 6,215 13603 3.56 BLEND -ALL HOTEL DEV INC ET AL Store (One Story) 14,308 13663 23.75 WAL-MART STORES EAST LP Store (One Story) 204,181 85110 1.50 CITY MATTRESS OF FL INC Store (One Story) 11,465 87621 1.89 CVS 75479 FL L L C Store (One Story) 13,157 119041 3.83 WALGREEN CO Store (One Story) 14,232 119403 2.65 7-ELEVEN INCS LLC Store (One Story) 7,793 121753 1.33 URIKA OIL INC Store (One Story) 3,448 122756 1.23 NATIONAL RETAIL PROPERTIES LP Store (One Story) 3,620 118713 2.73 LAND 850.034 TRUST Mixed Use - Store/Office (with SFR) 1,450 118717 1.64 LAND TRUST 850.038 Mixed Use - Store/Office (with SFR) 1,454 118719 2.81 850.032 LAND TRUST Mixed Use - Store/Office (with SFR) 1,248 118720 2.34 850.026 LAND TRUST Mixed Use - Store/Office (with SFR) 1,290 118723 2.34 850.031 LAND TRUST Mixed Use - Store/Office (with SFR) 1,581 118724 1.17 850.027 LAND TRUST Mixed Use - Store/Office (with SFR) 1,363 118727 1.14 LAND TRUST 850.045 Mixed Use - Store/Office (with SFR) 1,167 118795 2.81 850.33 LAND TRUST Mixed Use - Store/Office (with SFR) 2,678 85098 8.20 BRENTWOOD LAND PARTNERS LLC Community Shopping Center 84,344 85100 14.61 TARGET CORPORATION T-2063 Community Shopping Center 175,337 87623 4.86 CAMERON PARTNERS LLC Community Shopping Center 31,382 119113 5.29 CARLISLE WILSON PLAZA LLC Community Shopping Center 35,856 121719 2.50 PAC OF COLLIER INC Community Shopping Center 20,356 1664 0.46 TEJERINA, GABRIEL A=& BETTY One Story Office 3,460 13185 0.28 GRACE-KELLY LLC Restaurant 1,168 85108 1.80 CH NFL LLC Restaurant 6,225 421 0.82 GCD MISSION HILLS LLC Drive Thru Restaurant 2,171 85109 1.06 BRENTWOOD LAND PARTNERS LLC Drive Thru Restaurant 2,810 4713 1.27 BARNETT BANK N A Financial Institution 3,840 85106 1.16 AMSOUTH BANK Financial Institution 3,069 218584 6.60 PUBLIX SUPER MARKETS INC Vacant Commercial 50700 220522 1.91 7 ELEVEN INC Store (One Story) 3111 142048 1.65 CYPRESS CYCLE SERVICES INC Auto Sales/Service 2,400 14270 4.30 JONJAMES LLC Florist, Greenhouse 8,525 114.54 725,404 Average Building Sq. Ft. Per Acre: 6,333 Source: Collier County Comprehensive Planning Section Commercial Inventory, Collier County Property Appraiser and ArcGIS 37 Appendix B 15-Minute Drive Time Undeveloped Competing Parcels FID ACRES GIS O NAME1 LUSEDOR D 484 1.59 VANDERBILT COMMONS I TRUST Vacant Commercial 1695 1.00 PIEDMONT/METROLINA FUND#12 LLC Vacant Commercial 6602 4.11 ROBERT E WILLIAMS TRUST Vacant Commercial 13878 16.17 VOILA 11 LLC Vacant Commercial 13887 8.92 VOILA 11 LLC Vacant Commercial 87622 1.01 FIFTH THIRD BANK Vacant Commercial 118716 1.17 850.025 LAND TRUST Vacant Commercial 118718 2.34 850.023 LAND TRUST Vacant Commercial 118721 1.64 850.035 LAND TRUST Vacant Commercial 118725 2.81 GOLDEN GATE BLVD W TRUST Vacant Commercial 118726 2.34 850.024 LAND TRUST Vacant Commercial 118729 2.73 850.028 LAND TRUST Vacant Commercial 118796 5.15 850.018 LAND TRUST Vacant Commercial 118797 5.47 850.018 LAND TRUST Vacant Commercial 119039 2.58 CORDER, MICHAEL A=& LAUREN K Vacant Commercial 119040 2.58 CORDER, MICHAEL A=& LAUREN K Vacant Commercial 119044 2.34 CORDER, MICHAEL=& LAUREN K Vacant Commercial 119112 2.08 CENTRAL FL REAL EST OWNED LLC Vacant Commercial 136373 4.05 TRKR FAMILY TRUST Vacant Commercial 136418 5.46 TAYLOR, NORMAN L=& JOANNE Vacant Commercial 142105 2.58 SOUTHBROOKE MEDICAL OFFICE LLC Vacant Commercial 142149 2.56 SOUTHBROOKE MEDICAL OFFICE LLC Vacant Commercial 161614 5.32 PULTE HOME CORP Vacant Commercial 165698 1.42 CAMERON PARTNERS 11 LLC Vacant Commercial 165699 1.35 CAMERON PARTNERS 11 LLC Vacant Commercial 165701 1.74 RACETRAC PETROLEUM INC Vacant Commercial 165704 1.01 PIEDMONT/METROLINA FUND#12 LLC Vacant Commercial 218582 1.28 CYPRESS COMMERCIAL DEV LLC Vacant Commercial 218583 2.09 CVS 75462 FL LLC Vacant Commercial 220531 12.22 BOLLT TR, ROBERTO Vacant Residential 165706 1.00 CAMERON PARTNERS 11 LLC Vacant Commercial 165707 0.95 V&T LAND LLC Vacant Commercial 165841 1.64 PROFESSIONAL RESOURCE Vacant Commercial 110.69 Source: Collier County Comprehensive Planning Section Commercial Inventory, Collier County Property Appraiser and ArcGIS 38 Appendix C 15-Minute Drive Time Non -Competing Developed Commercial Eliminated Developed Non -Competitive Uses FID ACRES GIS O NAME1 LUSEDOR D BLDG SQFT 14208 82016 86253 86260 96886 98020 98024 98325 102724 165523 165633 165842 166187 166562 166563 166570 168512 169188 169191 4776 11975 12524 12525 12658 14324 14522 101874 102568 161519 165200 165203 166571 14314 74915 22632 13321 142046 2.39 0.64 1.13 0.33 0.14 2.67 3.30 1.28 1.43 0.37 13.74 0.62 0.82 0.43 0.97 0.58 1.52 1.96 1.68 20.81 100.06 75.09 38.70 11.51 1009.50 246.69 109.26 5.44 86.82 2.56 10.82 140.39 27.96 20.89 390.57 20.27 5.17 CLEARY HOLDINGS LLC ASSOCIA @ GULF COAST, AAMC BRISTOL PINES COMMUNITY BRISTOL PINES COMMUNITY COVE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION CRYSTAL LAKE PROPERTY OWNERS CRYSTAL LAKE PROPERTY OWNERS CRYSTAL LAKE JOINT VENTURE TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE HERITAGE BAY GOLF & COUNTRY HERITAGE BAY GOLF & COUNTRY HERITAGE BAY GOLF & COUNTRY HERITAGE BAY GOLF & COUNTRY CLUBHOMES AT HERITAGE GREENS HERITAGE GREENS COMMUNITY CRESTVIEW VILLAS AT HERITAGE HUNTINGTON LAKES ONE HUNGTON LAKES FOUR IBIS COVE MASTER PROPERTY TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE CYPRESS WOODS GOLF & COUNTRY CYPRESS WOODS GOLF & COUNTRY QUAIL CREEK VILLAGE FOUND INC QUAIL CREEK VLG FOUNDATION INC BONITA BAY CLUB INC OLDE FLORIDA GOLF CLUB INC TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE GC OF THE EVERGLADES LLC HERITAGE BAY GOLF & COUNTRY HERITAGE BAY GOLF & COUNTRY HERITAGE GREENS GOLF COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY RES COLLIER HOLDINGS LLC APAC-GEORGIA INC CRYSTAL LAKE PROPERTY OWNERS JOHN H WINKLER TR Tourist Attraction Tourist Attraction Tourist Attraction Tourist Attraction Tourist Attraction Tourist Attraction Tourist Attraction Tourist Attraction Tourist Attraction Tourist Attraction Tourist Attraction Tourist Attraction Tourist Attraction Tourist Attraction Tourist Attraction Tourist Attraction Tourist Attraction Tourist Attraction Tourist Attraction Golf courses, driving ranges Golf courses, driving ranges Golf courses, driving ranges Golf courses, driving ranges Golf courses, driving ranges Golf courses, driving ranges Golf courses, driving ranges Golf courses, driving ranges Golf courses, driving ranges Golf courses, driving ranges Golf courses, driving ranges Golf courses, driving ranges Golf courses, driving ranges Heavy Industrial Heavy Industrial Mineral Processing Open storage, building supplies, junk yd Open storage, building supplies, junk yd 16,000 2,471 4,079 334 648 3,440 9,292 1,590 234 255 256 177 307 162 2,358 269 9,366 288 4,882 126 18,977 7,000 9,425 6,250 29,835 33,130 126 8,540 25,874 12,450 23,982 16,183 1,670 299,340 11,140 71,120 4,704 39 FID ACRES GIS O NAME1 LUSEDOR D BLDG SQFT 6169 14.22 FLORIDA CONFERENCE ASSOCIATION Churches 3,600 14269 50.51 DEWANE, BISHOP FRANK Churches 54,074 14419 8.80 ST PAUL ANTIOCHIAN Churches 5,866 14429 36.36 LIVING WORD FAMILY CHURCH INC Churches 50,226 14492 4.37 SOUTHEASTERN CONFERENCE ASSOC Churches 3,433 116150 4.74 IGLESIA CRISTIANA LA ROCA INC Churches 10,759 116154 2.58 HAITIAN BETHESDA BAPTIST Churches 3,080 116934 4.77 GOLDEN GATE CONGREGATION OF Churches 8,496 116963 4.55 CYPRESS WOOD PRSBY CHURCH INC Churches 6,360 128775 1.93 CORKSCREW BAPTIST CHURCH INC Churches 3,536 142024 5.49 NORTH NAPLES BAPTIST CH INC Churches 22,416 142037 5.37 DESTINY CHURCH NAPLES INC Churches 8,355 142190 4.95 EAGLE'S NEST WORSHIP CENTER Churches 20,054 142229 2.26 NAPLES BAPTIST TEMPLE INC Churches 4,062 142272 6.02 ST MONICA'S EPISCOPAL Churches 15,252 169192 8.98 CORNERSTONE UNITED METHODIST Churches 16,000 13879 9.68 HERNANDEZ FAMILY LLC Private schools and colleges 7,216 87620 3.36 NAPLES COMMUNITY HOSPITAL INC Private Hospitals 41,465 Source: Collier County Comprehensive Planning Section Commercial Inventory, Collier County Property Appraiser and ArcGIS (Rest of page left intentionally blank) .E Appendix D 15-Minute Drive Time Non -Competing Undeveloped Commercial Parcels Eliminated Vacant Non -Competitive Uses FID ACRES_GIS O_NAME1 LUSEDOR_D 86408 1.08 WATERWAYS JV HOLDINGS LP Tourist Attraction 165162 0.46 HERITAGE BAY GOLF & COUNTRY Tourist Attraction 1509 51.52 STRAND AT NAPLES LLC Golf courses, driving ranges 2006 1.82 TWINEAGLES CLUB LLC, THE Golf courses, driving ranges 2208 13.41 QUARRY GOLF CLUB INC Golf courses, driving ranges 4035 6.97 PULTE HOME CORP Golf courses, driving ranges 4883 83.78 VANDERBILT CMMTY ASSOC INC Golf courses, driving ranges 11778 56.18 QUARRY GOLF CLUB INC Golf courses, driving ranges 11779 6.89 QUARRY GOLF CLUB INC Golf courses, driving ranges 11783 3.10 GRAND CYPRESS REC ASSOC INC Golf courses, driving ranges 11974 7.80 CYPRESS TRACE RECREATION Golf courses, driving ranges 12527 15.67 REFERENCE ONLY Golf courses, driving ranges 12854 9.45 OLDE CYPRESS DEVELOPMENT LTD Golf courses, driving ranges 13213 7.48 QUARRY GOLF CLUB INC Golf courses, driving ranges 14325 7.09 RESOURCE CONSERVATION SYS LLC Golf courses, driving ranges 101815 0.26 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE Golf courses, driving ranges 101880 1.66 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE Golf courses, driving ranges 101882 0.10 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE Golf courses, driving ranges 102002 2.17 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE Golf courses, driving ranges 102704 0.53 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE Golf courses, driving ranges 102913 13.98 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE Golf courses, driving ranges 102977 0.17 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE Golf courses, driving ranges 102978 0.06 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE Golf courses, driving ranges 102979 0.07 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE Golf courses, driving ranges 102982 2.83 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE Golf courses, driving ranges 102985 9.50 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE Golf courses, driving ranges 102989 7.99 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE Golf courses, driving ranges 102990 29.38 TAYLOR MORRISON ESPLANADE Golf courses, driving ranges 161430 8.94 GC OF THE EVERGLADES LLC Golf courses, driving ranges 161431 0.76 PULTE HOME CORP Golf courses, driving ranges 161432 1.76 PULTE HOME CORP Golf courses, driving ranges 161433 9.72 GC OF THE EVERGLADES LLC Golf courses, driving ranges 161436 3.66 PULTE HOME CORP Golf courses, driving ranges 161438 2.68 PULTE HOME CORP Golf courses, driving ranges 161443 20.97 PULTE HOME CORP Golf courses, driving ranges 161522 62.96 GC OF THE EVERGLADES LLC Golf courses, driving ranges 161528 0.40 GC OF THE EVERGLADES LLC Golf courses, driving ranges 41 FID ACRES GIS O NAME1 LUSEDOR D 161532 11.03 GC OF THE EVERGLADES LLC Golf courses, driving ranges 161537 5.36 PULTE HOME CORP Golf courses, driving ranges 161539 8.15 PULTE HOME CORP Golf courses, driving ranges 161541 3.13 PULTE HOME CORP Golf courses, driving ranges 161542 0.44 PULTE HOME CORP Golf courses, driving ranges 161544 6.21 PULTE HOME CORP Golf courses, driving ranges 161545 2.48 PULTE HOME CORP Golf courses, driving ranges 161546 1.71 PULTE HOME CORP Golf courses, driving ranges 161548 3.61 PULTE HOME CORP Golf courses, driving ranges 161549 0.35 PULTE HOME CORP Golf courses, driving ranges 161551 6.27 PULTE HOME CORP Golf courses, driving ranges 161554 9.39 PULTE HOME CORP Golf courses, driving ranges 161555 7.22 PULTE HOME CORP Golf courses, driving ranges 161556 0.85 PULTE HOME CORP Golf courses, driving ranges 161557 1.18 PULTE HOME CORP Golf courses, driving ranges 161559 5.58 PULTE HOME CORP Golf courses, driving ranges 161560 6.05 PULTE HOME CORP Golf courses, driving ranges 165273 32.91 HERITAGE BAY GOLF & COUNTRY Golf courses, driving ranges 165275 9.55 HERITAGE BAY GOLF & COUNTRY Golf courses, driving ranges 165276 20.73 HERITAGE BAY GOLF & COUNTRY Golf courses, driving ranges 165277 28.55 HERITAGE BAY GOLF & COUNTRY Golf courses, driving ranges 165278 2.18 HERITAGE BAY GOLF & COUNTRY Golf courses, driving ranges 165279 11.80 HERITAGE BAY GOLF & COUNTRY Golf courses, driving ranges 165281 28.28 HERITAGE BAY GOLF & COUNTRY Golf courses, driving ranges 165283 11.69 HERITAGE BAY GOLF & COUNTRY Golf courses, driving ranges 165284 0.29 HERITAGE BAY GOLF & COUNTRY Golf courses, driving ranges 166499 0.35 HERITAGE BAY GOLF & COUNTRY Golf courses, driving ranges 121752 3.83 URIKA OIL INC Open storage, building supplies, junk yd 20465 1.28 KEMPTON TR, GEORGE R Vacant Institutional 120349 3.41 CONSERVANCY OF SW FL INC Vacant Institutional 121182 7.20 RED APPLE AT COLLIER LLC Vacant Institutional 121183 6.09 RED APPLE AT COLLIER LLC Vacant Institutional 121185 2.96 RED APPLE AT COLLIER LLC Vacant Institutional 126263 1.14 CONSERVANCY OF SW FL INC Vacant Institutional 127061 1.59 CONSERVANCY OF SW FL INC Vacant Institutional 127384 2.73 HABITAT FOR HUMANITY Vacant Institutional 128214 1.17 CONSERVANCY OF SW FL INC Vacant Institutional 128645 3.41 CORKSCREW BAPTIST CHURCH INC Vacant Institutional 130771 2.95 COLLINS, CARY B=& JOYCE A Vacant Institutional 130772 2.46 COLLINS, CARY B=& JOYCE A Vacant Institutional 130774 2.46 SILVA, LEICY Vacant Institutional 131881 1.14 CONSERVANCY OF SW FL INC Vacant Institutional 42 FID ACRES_GIS O_NAME1 LUSEDOR_D 132576 1.64 EMMANUEL EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN Vacant Institutional 132614 2.50 EMMANUEL EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN Vacant Institutional 132615 2.50 EMMANUEL EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN Vacant Institutional 132616 1.61 EMMANUEL EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN Vacant Institutional 132618 2.50 EMMANUEL EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN Vacant Institutional 132619 2.50 EMMANUEL EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN Vacant Institutional 132620 1.68 EMMANUEL EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN Vacant Institutional 132657 5.00 EMMANUEL EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN Vacant Institutional 132658 1.67 EMMANUEL EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN Vacant Institutional 133522 3.01 MYJESUS MERCY MINISTRIES INC Vacant Institutional 133523 3.61 MYJESUS MERCY MINISTRIES INC Vacant Institutional 137902 1.59 CONSERVANCY OF SW FL INC Vacant Institutional 142042 2.73 FAITH BIBLE CHURCH/NAPLES INC Vacant Institutional Source: Collier County Comprehensive Planning Section Commercial Inventory, Collier County Property Appraiser and ArcGIS (Rest of page left intentionally blank) 43 APPENDIX E MetroStudy New Single -Family and Multi -Family Product in Collier County 1st - Quarter 2020 APPENDIX F Remaining 2010 U.S. Census Data for Subject Property Apartment Market Area 45 APPENDIX G Naples Daily News Editorial September 18, 2018 .6 Immokalee Road/4t" Street N.E. Mixed Use Subdistrict (PL20190002355) Exhibit V.E Public Facilities Provide the existing Level of Service Standard (LOS) and document the impact the proposed change will have on the following public facilities: The proposed Immokalee Road/4th Street N.E. Mixed Use Subdistrict is an undeveloped 50± acre parcel. The Subdistrict proposes up to 150,000 square feet of general retail, office and institutional space and 400 dwelling units on approximately 50± acres. The property is zoned Estates and currently permits single-family homes at 1 du/2.25 acres. The property would support up to 7 single family homes under the current plan designation. The public facilities analysis evaluates the project impacts on potable Water, wastewater, drainage, parks, schools, roadways, fire/EMS, and solid waste. The source for the LOS information is the 2019 AUIR. Potable Water The property is located within the Collier County potable water service area. The County has existing plant capacity of approximately 52 mgd. The proposed addition of 150,000 square feet of general commercial uses and up to 400 dwelling units will not create any LOS issues in the 5- year planning horizon. This Project will have no significant impact on the potable water system and capacity is available in Collier County. A comparison of the existing and proposed uses are shown below. Water Demand: Existing: 7 single family residential dwelling units: NA, single family homes would utilize private well Proposed: Retail/office 150,000 x 0.15 gpd/sf = 22,500 gpd Retail/office 150,000 x 0.15 gpd/sf x 1.5 max. month = 33,750 gpd 400 Multi -family dwelling units x 150 gpd x 2.4 pph = 144,000 gpd 400 Multi -family dwelling units x 150 gpd x 2.4 pph x 1.5 max. month = 216,000 gpd Collier County LOS: Permitted Capacity: Required Plant Capacity FY29 *Based on EP Estimates Data Source: Collier County 2019 AUIR 150 gpcd/(0.15) gpd/sf* 52.75 mgd 51.43 mgd mays, 2020 © C radyiN inor RCIRP-19 Exhibit VE.docx Clvll ETIglhccrs • Larui stln'cyors • I'lanncrs • Landscape, ArChRCct+ Page 1 of 4 Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, FL 34134 • 239-947-1144 • engineering@gradyminor.com • www.gradyminor.com Sanitary Sewer The subject project is located within the service boundary of Collier County utilities with standards for Sanitary Sewer established in the Capital Improvement Element of the Collier County Growth Management Plan. The subdistrict is located in the north sewer service area of the Collier County Water/Sewer District. This Project will have no significant impact on the Collier County Regional Sewer System. A comparison of the existing and proposed uses are shown below. Sewer Demand: Existing: 7 single family residential dwelling units: NA, single family homes would utilize septic tank for sewage disposal. Proposed: Retail/office 150,000 x 0.15 gpd/sf = 22,500 gpd Retail/office 150,000 x 0.15 gpd/sf x 1.5 max. month = 33,750 gpd 400 Multi -family dwelling units x 100 gpd x 2.4 pph = 96,000 gpd 400 Multi -family dwelling units x 100 gpd x 2.4 pph x 1.5 max. month = 144,000 gpd Collier County LOS: Permitted Capacity: Required Plant Capacity FY29: *Based on EP Estimates Data Source: Collier County 2019 AUIR Arterial and Collector Roads 100 gpcd/(0.15) gpd/sf* 26.35 mgd 25.75 mgd Please refer to the Traffic Impact Statement for discussions of the project's impact on level of service for arterial and collector roadways within the project's radius of development influence. Drainage The County has adopted a LOS standard for private developments which requires development to occur consistent with water quantity and quality standards established in Ordinances 74-50, 90-10, 2001-27, and LDC Ordinance 2004-41, as may be amended. An environmental Resource Permit (ERP) issued by the South Florida Water Management District which has established criteria for the volume of water stored on site as well as the quality of the water which may be discharged from the site. The development within the subdistrict will be consistent with the County LOS standards. Page 2 of 4 Solid Waste The adopted LOS for solid waste is two years of lined cell capacity at the previous 3 year average tons per year disposal rate and 10 years of permittable landfill capacity of the disposal rate. There are no current capacity issues and none are anticipated through the year 2067. Existing: .55/pp disposal rate 2.4 pp/household 7 single family residences permitted 7 x 2.4 pp/household x .55 pp = 9.24 tons solid waste/year Proposed: Retail/office 150,000 x 5 Ibs/1,000 sq ft = 750 Ibs/day x 365 = 273,750 Ibs/year or 273.75 tons/year 400 multi -family dwelling units x 4 Ibs/day = 1,600 Ibs/day x 365 = 584,000 Ibs/year or 292 tons/year Current landfill capacity in 2019 is anticipated to be 13,547,175 tons. Ten-year surplus capacity: 10,872,170 Source: Collier County 2019 AUIR Cal Recycle Parks: Community and Regional Parks impact fees are not assessed for commercial development. The proposed 400 multi -family dwellings will pay park impact fees to mitigate for their impacts on this public facility. Parks level of service Community Parks 1.2 ac/1,000 population Regional Parks 2.7 ac/1,000 population Community Park Available Inventory 594.74 acres Required inventory 538.73 acres Source: Collier County 2019 AUIR No deficits exist or are anticipated in community or regional parks over the 5-year planning horizon. The constructed dwelling units will pay community and regional park Impact Fees which will provide the County with revenues to fund future park improvements in Collier County. No adverse impacts to Community or Regional Parks result from the amendment of the subdistrict. Page 3 of 4 Schools School impact fees are not assessed for commercial development. The proposed 400 multi- family dwellings will pay school impact fees to mitigate for their impacts. No adverse impacts to schools result from the creation of the subdistrict. Fire Control and EMS The proposed project lies within the North Collier Fire Rescue District. The North Collier Fire Rescue District - Station #10 is located at 13240 Immokalee Rd, which is approximately one-half mile from the southern property boundary. Emergency Medical Service - Station #10 is located at 17596 Immokalee Road, which is approximately one-half mile from the northern property boundary. No significant impacts to Fire Control level of service are anticipated due to the proposed project. Estimated impact fees for EMS and fire would be determined at time of SDP based on each unit. Sheriff, Fire Protection and EMS Services location/address of facilities intended to serve the project are; North Collier Fire and Rescue District - Station #10 13240 Immokalee Rd Emergency Medical Service - Station #10 17596 Immokalee Rd Collier County Sheriff's Office - District 4 (Estates Substation) 14750 Immokalee Rd Page 4 of 4 SUBJECT PROPERTY MMOKALEE E* n�ca-piavina 0.— EI ryantl PaImaM Ritlga Hgh Scho Mitltll. Sc ema" ® OIL WELL WEI L ROAY1UD, /I /F" 1 - I -- FkGshitl°s�tla�«,o RANDALL BLVD.' z z 0 L ,e ,e. No,l F ae - sc — o ® SCHOOLS PARKS F FIRE STATIONS E EMERGENCY MEDICAL STATIONS SHERIFF'S STATIONS AND - a SUBSTATIONS ® ❑E— FE Library 2000' 4000' ❑ LIBRARIES Ma. H", aa.k I—i ramm Gate S,a'an 71 ]1 SCALE: 1 4000' H PUBLIC HEALTH SYSTEMS AND HOSPITALS IMMOKALEE ROAD/4TH STREET N.E. SC "1 a V.( Mh,orand AaaaciatP.A. JOBCODE: ©GradyMinor ;ntllll Via Del Url Rcy Bo Bonlla 3prings. Florida 31131 MIXED USE SUBDISTRICT DATE °Irer Civil Engineers . Land Surveyors Planners Cert. ER 0005151 Cert. Auth. LB 0005151 . Landscape Architects Business LC 26000266 EXHIBIT V.E. EPEE PNn E: 2D2o oFAuth. of PUBLIC FACILITIES MAP RHIE - , o Bonita Springs: 239.947.1144 GradyA1innr. nnm uww. Fort Myers: 239.690.4380 SHEET OF 1 I O DocuSign Envelope ID: 71C9B826-5D7A-44BF-BC53-5A478858947B JMB TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING, IND. TRAFFIC/TRANSPIIRTATION ENGINEERING & PLANNING SERVICES TRAFFIC IMPACT STATEMENT For Randall Curve MPUD (Collier County, Florida) May 20, 2020 Revised October 27, 2020 County TIS Review Fees TIS Methodology Review Fee = $500.00 TIS (Major Study) Review Fee =$1,500.00 Prepared by: JMB TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING, INI;. 4711 7TH AVENUE SW NAPLES, FLORIDA 341 19 CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORIZATION NO. 27830 (PROJECT NO. 19101 1 ) JAM Doc uSigned by: ,�cuMt,S i�joUn,�S E519D679D23E47F... rr rSA.iy�ild�rr�pl; ` 5 No 43860 ; ST f� 7 BANK 4i a R l C) , p A,iEF� 11141Y DocuSign Envelope ID: 71C9B826-5D7A-44BF-BC53-5A478858947B TABLE OF CONTENTS Conclusions 2 Table A -Committed Transportation Improvements 3 Methodology 4 Scope of Project 4 Table B - Proposed Land Uses 4 Figure 1 4.1 Master Concept Plan 4.2 Project Generated Traffic 5 Table C - New Site -Generated Trips 5 Table 1 - Trip Generation Computations 5.1 Existing + Committed Road Network 6 Project Traffic Distribution 8 Area of Significant Impact 8 Figure 2A - Residential Project Traffic Distribution 8.1 Figure 211 - Commercial Project Traffic Distribution 8.2 Table 2 - Area of Impact/Road Classification 8.3 2019 thru 2027 Project Build -out Traffic Conditions 9 Table 3 - 2019 & 2027 Link Volumes 9.1 Table 4 - 2027 Link Volumes/Capacity Analysis 9.2 Appendix 10 1 DocuSign Envelope ID: 71C9B826-5D7A-44BF-BC53-5A478858947B Conclusions Based upon the findings of this report, it was determined that Randall Curve MPUD will not adversely impact the surrounding road network or cause any roadways to operate below their adopted levels of services. This conclusion is based upon the findings that Collier County's existing plus committed (E + C) road network has adequate capacity to accommodate the 2027 background traffic "plus" the site -generated traffic associated with the development of 400 multi -family dwelling units and/or trips equivalent single- family units and 150,000 square feet of commercial retail/office space. The Developer will be required to pay for its portion of "consumed" capacity via payment of road impact fees. As set forth by Collier County's Impact Fee Ordinance, the fees are a pro rata assessment towards the funding of area -wide transportation improvements to support new growth. The amount of road impact fees paid per type of land use are determined via a "consumption -based impact fee approach", in which new development is charged based upon the proportion of vehicle -miles of travel (VMT) that each unit of new development is expected to consume of a lane mile of roadway network. The cost of consumed lane mile is based upon current roadway construction costs within Collier County. Therefore, the payment of road impact fees is the project's pro rata share of funding transportation improvements that are deemed necessary to support the demands generated by new growth. If approved, the Randall Curve PUD will be subject to a maximum trips cap of 753 two- way new external PM peak hour trips. 2 DocuSign Envelope ID: 71C9B826-5D7A-44BF-BC53-5A478858947B Committed Area -Wide Transportation Improvements Based upon the area's existing and forecasted traffic demands, it was determined that the E + C road network will continue to operate at acceptable levels of service for project build -out conditions. However, the "anticipated" traffic demands for that area are subject to change pending the status of other large-scale projects that may become entitled for development (e.g., rural lands west). It is for this reason; Collier County Government has accelerated the planning and funding of several major roadway improvement projects. Transportation improvements that are currently funded are considered to be committed improvements for this study are described below in Table A. Table A Planned and/or Committed Area -Wide Transportation Improvements Transportation Improvement Status Notes Oil Well Road (Everglades Blvd -to -Oil Well Grade) widen to 4-lanes within 6-lane footprint) Funded 16th Street Bridge Reduces traffic demand on /S collector between Randall and Golden Gate Funded Randall Blvd & Immokalee Rd Reduces traffic demand on Vanderbilt Beach Road Ext (C.R. 951 to Wilson Blvd) Funded Randall Blvd, Immokalee Rd & (New 2-lane divided road within 6-lane footprint)_Golden Gate Blvd Reduces traffic demand on Vanderbilt Beach Road Ext (Wilson Blvd to Everglades) Funded Randall Blvd, Immokalee Rd & (New 2-lane undivided road within 6-lane footprint) Golden Gate Blvd Randall Boulevard (Immokalee Rd-to-8t` Street) widen to 4-lanes Funded Randall Boulevard & Immokalee Road Intersection (at -grade improvements) Funded Wilson Boulevard (Golden Gate Blvd to Immokalee Rd) widen to 4-lanes Funded Site Access Improvements Randall Curve MPUD proposes to construct two (2) points of access on Immokalee Road. The design and type of the accesses on Immokalee Road will be established at the time of Plat or SDP approval. The project will also construct a vehicular interconnection to the undeveloped property that is contiguous to the north. The interconnection will be extended to be create a shared full access to Immokalee Road via the signalized intersection of Immokalee Road and Orange Tree Boulevard. DocuSign Envelope ID: 71C9B826-5D7A-44BF-BC53-5A478858947B Methodology On April 17, 2020, a Traffic Impact Statement (TIS) Methodology Report was submitted to the office of Collier County Transportation Planning Department. The $500.00 methodology meeting fee will be paid at the time of submitting the zoning application. A copy of the approved TIS methodology has been provided in the appendix (refer to pages M1 thru M11). Scope of Project Randall Curve MPUD is a proposed multi -use project that will consist of 400 multi- family dwelling units and/or trips equivalent single-family units and 150,000 square feet of commercial/retail. The Developer has the option of converting single-family units to multi -family units, but the total trips PM peak hour two-way residential land use trips cannot exceed 203 vph. The site is located on the northwest corner of 4' Street N.E. and Immokalee Road within Collier County, Florida. Randall Curve MPUD proposes to construct two (2) points of access on. Immokalee Road. The design and type of the accesses on Immokalee Road will be established at the time of Plat or SDP approval. The project will also construct a vehicular interconnection to the undeveloped property that is contiguous to the north. The interconnection will be extended to be create a shared full access to Immokalee Road via the signalized intersection of Immokalee Road and Orange Tree Boulevard. For additional site details, refer to the MCP prepared by Grady Minor. Table B Proposed Land Uses Proposed Land Uses Units/Size Multi -Family" (Potential Conversion to Single -Family) 400 d.u.'s Commercial/ Retail 150,000 s.f. * * The Developer has the option of converting multi -family units to single-family units to multi -family units, but the total trips PM peak hour two-way residential land use trips cannot exceed 203 vph. a] DocuSign Envelope ID: 71C9B826-5D7A-44BF-BC53-5A478858947B { Immokole Rd ---Golden Gate Boulevard Golden Gate Parkway ,1 Oil Well Road Randall Boulevard O m NORTH N.T.S. LEGEND COMMITTED IMPROVEMENT PLANNED IMPROVEMENT — — — — — INTERSTATE HIGHWAY : 6—LANE ARTERIAL 4—LANE ARTERIAL/COLLECTOR — — — — — 2—LANE ARTERIAL 2—LANE COLLECTOR/LOCAL RAIL ROAD JIMTRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING, INC. Randall Curve M P U D Project Location & FIGURE 1 April 17, 2020 Roadway Classification 4, I DocuSign Envelope ID: 71C9B826-5D7A-44BF-BC53-5A478858947B ZONED: E, ESTATES USE: RESIDENTIAL ZONED: E, ESTATES POTENTIAL ` UNDEVELOPED I ZONED: E, ESTATES USE:INTERCONNECTION I USE: UNDEVELOPED RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL (PROPOSED I CPUD, PL20200000546) I W W W *PRESERVE W W W If iI I W W W W 10' WIDE TYPE W W 'A' LANDSCAPE l 11 I W BUFFER(SEE W MINIMUM 6-FOOT WIDE NOTE #3) J y W LANDSCAPE BUFFER �^ RESERVATION y W (SEE NOTE #2) I� ZONED: ORANGETREE PUD SE: UNDEVELOPED W ❑ I/' ' COMMERCIAL Iwj II 20' WIDE TYPE 'D' LANDSCAPE BUFFER Lu I I w I w A NITY I REA W w ENERAL' W OCATION W I L •l- k ZONED: ORANGETREE PUD USE: RESIDENTIAL ZONED: E, ESTATES USE: RESIDENTIALuj r r r 20'WIDETYPE I I / LEGEND 'D' LANDSCAPE I r /� 20' WIDE TYPE BUFFER j I j ,/ 'D' LANDSCAPE ® DEVIATION i� i r / BUFFER - R RESIDENTIAL ' C COMMERCIAL ----------------� I 5 Ii 0 V ZONED: E, ESTATES USE: UNDEVELOPED RESIDENTIAL I I / ZONED: ORANGETREE PUD — I/ USE: COMMERCIAL ' / 0 150' 300' o J SCALE: 1" = 300' RANDALL CURVE MPUD KA 9. Craax M�r,o� a��u nsyumaEes_ r n_ GradyMinor niuio I a DO tzw Oe xo„na sNrKy. r�iaa s-iia� EXHIBIT C,�_'- Civil Gagineere Lana Surveyors Planners i,andacape MASTER PLAN �rchitecta ea.E Kam'° o fcrc, o£.iuW. G9000515i cero,nuq,, LY9W5151 Uuslnc•s i,f, 260002flA ixr-is Equgrt -u,� J Bouifa Spruign: 239.9.17.71.14 ��u-�,. r,raay.sn,,,,,•_��„� Hon NVem: 23s.69o.gaao REVISED: OCTOBER 33, 2020 i of 2 �: Z DocuSign Envelope ID: 71C9B826-5D7A-44BF-BC53-5A478858947B Project Generated Traffic Traffic that can be expected to be generated by Randall Curve MPUD was estimated based upon the guidelines established by the Institute of Transportation Engineers, Trip Generation Manual, 101 Edition. That is, historical traffic data collected at similar land uses was relied upon in estimating the project's traffic. It was determined that land use codes "Multi -Family" (LUC 220) and "Shopping Center" (LUC 820) were most representative. Trips estimated for LUC 820 were adjusted to account for a 25% pass -by rate. As determined, the project could generate 8,924 new daily trips and 348 vph and 753 vph new trips during the AM and PM peak hours, respectively. Table 1 depicts the computations performed in determining the project's total trips, new trips, and net external new trips. Table C provides a summary of the trip generation computation results that are shown in Table 1. Table C New Site -Generated Trips (Summation of Table 1) Daily Weekday New AM Peak Hour New PM Peak Hour New Trips Generated Trips Generated Trips Generated ADT h h 8,924 348 753 5 DocuSign Envelope ID: 71C9B826-5D7A-44BF-BC53-5A478858947B TABLE 1 TRIP GENERATION COMPUTATIONS Randall Curve PUD Land Use Code Land Use Description Maximum Build Schedule 220 Multi -Family (See Footnote No. 1) 400 Units 820 Shopping Center 150,000 s.f. Code Trip Period Trip Generation Equation Total Trips Trips Enter/Exit LUC 220 Daily Traffic (ADT) = T = 7.56(X) - 40.86 = 2,983 ADT AM Peak Hour = Ln(T) = 0.95Ln(X)-0.51 = 178 vph 41 / 137 vph 23% Enter/ 77% Exit = PM Peak Hour = Ln(T) = 0.89Ln(X)-0.02 = 203 vph 128 / 75 vph 63% Enter/ 37% Exit = Code Trip Period Trip Generation Equation Total Trips Trips Enter Exit LUC 820 Daily Traffic (ADT) = Ln(T) = 0.68Ln(X)+5.57 = 7,921 ADT AM Peak Hour (vph) = T = 0.5(X)+151.78= 227 vph 141 / 86 vph 62% Enter/ 38% Exit = PM Peak Hour (vph) = Ln(T) = 0.74Ln(X)+2.89 µ 734 vph 352 / 381 vph 48% Enter/ 52% Exit = 25% Pass -by Rate New Daily Traffic (ADT; (ADT) x (% of New Trips) 5,941 New AM Peak Hour (vr (AM) x (% of New Trips) 170 105 / 65 vph 62% Enter/ 38% Exit = New PM Peak Hour (vp (PM) x (% of New Trips) 550 264 / 286 vph 48% Enter/ 52% Exit = Total External Trips New External Daily Traffic (ADT) = 8,924 ADT New External AM Peak Hour (vph) = 348 vph 146 / 202 vph New External PM Peak Hour (vph) = 753 vph 392 / 361 vph Footnote No. ] - Multi -family units may be converted to single-family units but the Residential External Trips cannot exceed 203 PM two-way trips. DocuSign Envelope ID: 71C9B826-5D7A-44BF-BC53-5A478858947B Existing + Committed Road Network Figure 1 and Table 2 provide a detail of the surrounding E + C road network. Table 2 also shows the roads' respective minimum level of service performance standards and capacity. Oil Well Road varies from a two-lane to a four -lane major east/west arterial that extends between its western terminus at its intersection with Immokalee Road to S.R. 29 and continues east through rural/agricultural lands to its eastern terminus at the Collier County Line. Between Immokalee Road and Everglades Boulevard, Oil Well Road is classified as a four -lane divided arterial having a maximum LOS D capacity of 2,000 vphpd. Between Everglades Boulevard and Oil Well Grade Road, Oil Well Road will be widened from a two-lane arterial to a four -lane divided arterial. 16th Street Bridge Collier County has funded the construction of 10 Street NE bridge that will be completed by 2021/2022. The bridge will provide an alternate means of north/south access for the Randall Boulevard area. More specifically, the bridge will create a north/south interconnect between Randall Boulevard and Golden Gate Boulevard and between Randall Boulevard and the extension of Vanderbilt Beach Road that will reduce traffic demands on Randall Boulevard and Immokalee Road. Vanderbilt Beach Road Collier County has funded Vanderbilt Beach Road Extension, which consists of a two-lane arterial that can be expanded to six -lanes. The road will be extended from its eastern terminus (east of C.R. 951) to intersect Everglades Boulevard. Vanderbilt Beach Road will substantially reduce traffic demands on Immokalee Road, Randall Boulevard and Golden Gate Boulevard. Construction is expected to begin in the year 2021. Everglades Boulevard is a major two-lane north/south arterial that extends between its southern terminus (south of 1-75) to its northern terminus at its intersection with Immokalee Road. Desoto Boulevard is a major two-lane north/south arterial that extends between its southern terminus (immediately north of 1-75) to its northern terminus at its intersection with Oil Well Road. Wilson Boulevard is a major two-lane north/south arterial that extends between its northern terminus (north of Immokalee Road) to its southern terminus (south of Golden Gate Boulevard). Wilson Boulevard (between Golden Gate Boulevard and Immokalee Road) will be widened to a four -lane divided arterial- Immokalee Road varies from a two-lane to a four -lane and six -lane major cast/west and north/south arterial. The road extends between its western terminus at U.S. 41 to the northern Golden Gate Estates Area and then north/south to the Immokalee Community and interconnects with S.R. 29. South of Oil Well Road, Immokalee Road is classified as a six -lane divided arterial; and north of Oil Well Road it is classified as a four -lane divided and two-lane arterial. Immokalee Road has a posted speed limit of 45 MPH_ Co DocuSign Envelope ID: 71C9B826-5D7A-44BF-BC53-5A478858947B Randall Boulevard Collier County has funded the four -lane construction of Randall Boulevard (between Immokalee Road and 8th Street), as well as intersection improvements at the intersection of Randall Boulevard and Immokalee Road. Also, the newly constructed bridge at 8th Street NE and the funded bridge at 16th Street NE will provide an alternate means of nortblsouth access to the Randall Boulevard area. More specifically, the bridges will create a north/south interconnect between Randall Boulevard and Golden Gate Boulevard and between Randall Boulevard and the extension of Vanderbilt Beach Road that will reduce traffic demands on Randall Boulevard. Randall Boulevard & Immokalee Road Collier County has funded at -grade intersection improvements which will reduce congestion at this location. Figure 2D provides as detail of the intersection's Phase 1 Improvements. Planned and/or Committed Area -Wide Transportation Improvements Transportation Improvement Status Notes Oil Well Road (Everglades Blvd -to -Oil Well Grade) widen to 4-lanes within 6-lane footprint) Funded 16th Street Bridge Reduces traffic demand on /S collector between Randall and Golden Gate Funded Randall Blvd & Immokalee Rd Reduces traffic demand on Vanderbilt Beach Road Ext (C.R. 951 to Wilson Blvd) Funded Randall Blvd, Immokalee Rd & (New 2-lane divided road within 6-lane footprint) Golden Gate Blvd Reduces traffic demand on Vanderbilt Beach Road Ext (Wilson Blvd to Everglades) Funded Randall Blvd, Immokalee Rd & (New 2-lane undivided road within 6-lane footprint) Golden Gate Blvd Randall Boulevard (Immokalee Rd-to-8th Street) widen to 4-lanes Funded Randall Boulevard & Immokalee Road Intersection (at -grade improvements) Funded Wilson Boulevard (Golden Gate Blvd to Immokalee Rd) widen to 4-1anes Funded 7 DocuSign Envelope ID: 71C9B826-5D7A-44BF-BC53-5A478858947B Project Traffic Distribution The project's residential trips were distributed to the surrounding road network based upon logical means of ingress/egress, current and future traffic patterns in the area, and the location of surrounding businesses, employment opportunities, recreational areas, schools, etc. Figure 2A depicts the distribution of trips on the percentage of residential traffic generated. Table 2 details the project's PM peak hour residential trips assignments to the surrounding road network. The projects commercial traffic was distributed to the surrounding road network based upon the location of competing markets and nearby residential densities. Figure 2B depicts the distribution of trips based upon the percentage of the commercial traffic generated. Table 2 details the project's PM peak hour commercial trips assignments to the surrounding road network. Table 2 summarizes the combined residential f commercial PM peak hour trips assignments to the surrounding road network - Area of Significant Impact The area of significant impact was determined based upon Collier County's 2%, 2% and 3% criteria (i.e., if the project's traffic is 2% or more of a roadway's adopted level of service capacity, then the project has a significant impact upon that link). Figure 2A shows the project's residential trip distributions, and Figure 2B details the project's commercial trip distributions. Table 2 describes the project's residential and commercial traffic distributions and the level of impact on the surrounding roadways. Roads that were identified as being within the projects area impact are identified in Table 2. 8 DocuSign Envelope ID: 71C9B826-5D7A-44BF-BC53-5A478858947B b` 0 De b* Boukvard E�d�yl.d•s eMa 1I al � 7 Bth SttW HE al ! I 81h $kreet NE 5► T 11. 5—%r I ! �I }• a`no 3 5 % 0 Moon B u rd O � I �•r I'rj � I ... s I * of �I u7y_ E Oz Ma do Wmdermt I ' I 107.1 0% 12%111%+15% ollier Boulevard (CR 951) el ! inI 7% iogarr t7oulevar�G ". "" _ _ m o N a' ' o! n E I I-75 ean.w c or 10% I •�•` 1 75 n er• 3% O �► Livingston Rood a LEGEND arp�t P"lang Rd a 04 Residential Traffic Distribution Randall Curve MPUD October 27, 2020 ,MTRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING, INc. RESIDENTIAL LAND USE PROJECT -GENERATED FIGURE 2A TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION 1.1 DocuSign Envelope ID: 71C9B826-5D7A-44BF-BC53-5A478858947B 4► O 1 % Oseeto Boulevard 4 2 % b\ a 57 � i-0�♦ 5%. 55% a Ewglode Bhd 18td t NE I o �I "iI Bth Sheet NE [9i 5%►"I' N o I 20% f� I Y p M t � I a _I 3� 3%�1 2 0 �-1 Comer i3o- u^65ygb� In N ~~ Sortta Barbma Beuleva BoniW Gm' Gr 175 � Im�ia�PaA[ :_� LEGEND j 007.� Commercial Traffic Distribution H vi � r oz z Randall Curve MPUD October 27, 2020 N a - 1-75 8 tit t _-.-�--- --- Vl7vTRAN5PORTATION EG NGINEERING, IN. 7 COMMERCIAL LAND USE PROJECT -GENERATED FIGURE 2B TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION TABLE 2 0 PROJECT'S AREA OF IMPACT Cn 9 m m Res. Project Traffic Peak Direction (vphpd) = 128 Enterinc 75 Exiting -°o Com. Project Traffic Peak Direction (vphpd) = 264 Enterinc 286 Exiting Total Total m p LOS Servic( Res Res Res Com Com Com Project Project PK Directior Project Pk Hr Pk Hr Project Pk Hr Pk Hr Pk Hr Non -Pk Road ierv. Vo Volume Traffic Enter Exit Traffic Enter Exit Enter Exit Impact Percent 3ignifica co Class LOS (vphpd) %Dist. (vph) (vph) %Dist. (vph) (vph) (vphl (vph] Stand Impact Impact 17.0 Golden Gate Blvc Collier Blvd to Wilson 4D D 2300 5% 6 4 13% 31a 3 r 40 41 3% 1.78% NO D 123.0 Wilson to 18th Street 4D D 2300 0% 0 0 2% 5 6 5 6 3% 0.25% NO 123.1 18th Street to Everglades Blvd 4D D 2300 0% 0 0 2% 5 6 5 6 3% 0.25% NO 30.1 C.R. 951 Immokalee Rd to Vanderbilt Rd 6D E 3000 10% 13 8 3% 8 9 21 17 3% 0.57% NO n 30.2 Vanderbilt to Golden Gate 6D E 3000 15% 19 11 3% 8 9 27 20 3% 0.66% NO W 31.1 Golden Gate Blvd to Pine Ridge 6D E 3000 20% 26 15 2% 5 6 31 21 3% 0.69% NO 31.2 Pine Ridge to Green Blvd 6D E 3000 11 % 14 8 1 % 3 3 17 11 3% 0.37% NOco 41.2 Immokalee Rd Goodlette-Frank to Airport 6D E 3100 4% 5 3 1 % 3 3 8 6 3% 0.19% NO Cn 42.1 Airport Road to Livingston Rd 6D E 3100 17% 22 13 1 % 3 3 25 16 3% 0.50% NO 42.2 Livingston Rd to 1-75 6D/8D E 3500 20% 26 15 2% 5 6 31 21 3% 0.59% NO 00 43.1 1-75 to Logan Blvd 6D/8D E 3500 35% 45 26 3% 8 9 53 35 3% 1.00% NO 43.2 Logan Blvd to C.R. 951 6D E 3200 35% 45 26 5% 13 14 58 40 3% 1.25% NO 44.6 C.R. 951 to Wilson Blvd 6D E 3300 50% 64 38 10% 26 29 90 67 3% 2.03% YES 45.a Wilson Blvd to Randall 6D E 3300 85% 109 64 30% 79 86 188 150 3% 4.53% YES 45.b Randall to oil Well 6D E 3300 15% 19 11 40% 106 114 125 125 3% 3.79% YES 46.0 Oil Well to S.R. 29 2U D 900 5% 6 4 5% 13 14 19 18 3% 2.01 % YES 50.0 Logan Blvd Immokalee Rd to Vanderbilt 2U D 1000 7% 9 5 1 % 3 3 12 8 3% 0.81 % NO 111.1 Vanderbilt BR Airport Rd to Livingston Rd 6D E 3000 15% 19 11 1 % 3 3 16 11 3% 0.37% NO 111.2 Livingston to Logan Blvd 6D E 3000 20% 26 15 1% 3 3 20 18 3% 0.60% NO 112.0 Logan Blvd to C.R. 951 6D E 3000 20% 26 15 2% 5 6 31 21 3% 0.69% NO 90 C.R. 951 to Wilson Blvd 2LD D 1200 30% 38 23 5% 13 14 51 37 3% 3.07% YES lv Wilson to Everglades Blvd 2U D 1000 0% 0 0 3% 8 9 8 9 3% 0.86% NO 118.0 Wilson Blvd Immokalee Rd to Golden Gate Blvd 4D D 2000 35% 45 26 20% 53 57 98 83 3% 4.17% YES 119.0 Oil Weil Road Immokalee to Everglades 4D D 2000 10% 13 8 25% 66 72 79 80 2% 4.00% YES 120.0 Everglades to Desoto 4D D 2000 10% 13 8 15% 40 43 53 51 2% 2.55% YES 121.1 Desoto to Oil Well Grade 4D ❑ 2000 10% 13 8 10% 26 29 39 37 2% 1.85% NO 121.2 Oil Well Grade to Ave Maria 4D D 2000 10% 13 8 7% 18 20 31 28 2% 1.38% NO 132.a Randall Blvd Immokalee Rd to 8th Street 4D D 2000 0% 0 0 25% 66 72 66 72 3% 3.58% YES 132.b 8th Street to Everglades 2U D 900 0% 0 0 20% 53 57 53 57 3% 6.36% YES 133.0 Everglades to Desoto 2U D 900 0% 0 0 5% 13 14 13 14 2% 1.59% NO 135.1.a Everglades Blvd Golden Gate Blvd to VBR 2U D 800 0% 0 0 5% 13 14 13 14 3% 1.79% NO 135.1.b VBR to Randall Blvd 2U D 800 0% 0 0 10% 26 29 26 29 3% 3.58% YES 136.0 Oit Well Rd to Immokalee Rd 2U D 800 0% 0 0 5% 13 14 13 14 2% 1.79% NO 138.a Desoto Blvd Randall to Oil Weli 2U D 800 0% 0 0 1 % 3 3 3 3 2% 0.36% NO 138.b Golden Gate Blvd to Randall 2U D 800 0% 0 0 3% 8 9 8 9 2% 1.07% NO DocuSign Envelope ID: 71C9B826-5D7A-44BF-BC53-5A478858947B 2019 thru 2027 Project Build -out Traffic Conditions Project Impacted RoadwaE Links In order to establish 2019 thru 2027 project build -out traffic conditions, two forecasting methods were used. The first traffic forecasting method was the County's traffic count data was adjusted for peak season conditions, peak hour conditions, peak direction, and an annual growth rate was then applied. The peak season/peak hour/peak direction factor as shown on Table 3 was derived from the 2019 Collier County AUIR Reports. The annual growth rate was also obtained from the 2019 AUIR Report. Using the annual growth rate, the 2027 background traffic conditions were determined, which are depicted in Table 3. The second traffic forecasting method was to add the vested trips (trip bank) identified in the 2019 AUIR report to the adjusted peak season, peak hour and peak direction traffic counts. The 2027 vested trips "+" background traffic volumes are depicted in Table 3. The greater of the two values produced by the two forecasting procedures was then considered to reflect the 2027 background traffic. The net new project generated traffic was then added to the background traffic. Table 4 provides a summary of the 2019 thru 2027 traffic conditions and the roadways' level of service and remaining available capacity. As determined, Randall Curve PUD will not adversely impact the surrounding road network or cause any roadways to operate below their adopted levels of services. This conclusion is based upon the findings that Collier County's existing plus committed (E + C) road network has adequate capacity to accommodate the 2027 background traffic "plus" the site -generated traffic. 9 44.0 Immokalee Rd 45. a 45. b 46.0 Vanderbilt BR 118.0 Wilson Blvd 119.0 Oil Well Road 120.0 132.a Randall Blvd 132.b 133.0 135.1.b Everglades Blvd TABLE 3 2019 & 2027 ROADWAY LINK VOLUMES Per Vested Trips Methc Per Growth Rate Method 2027 2027 Peak Hour 2019 Growth Peak Hour PK Direction AUIR AUIR Rate PK Direction trip Background Traffic Pk per Background Bank Per Vested Trips vt phpd) DiR AUIR (vphpol (vphpd) v( phpo) C.R. 951 to Wilson Blvd 2050 E 3.52% 2704 888 2938 Wilson Blvd to Randall 2460 E/N 4.00% 3367 364 2824 Randall to Oil Well 2460 E!N 4.00% 3367 364 2824 Oil Well to S.R. 29 460 N 4.00% 630 152 612 C.R. 951 to Wilson Blvd NIA E NIA 767 NIA NIA Immokalee Rd to Golden Gate Blvd 350 N 2,00% 410 1 351 Immokalee to Everglades 840 E 4,94% 1235 352 1192 Everglades to Desoto 390 W 2.00% 457 184 574 Immokalee Rd to 8th Street 810 E 2.00% 949 26 836 8th Street to Everglades 810 E 2.00% 949 26 836 Everglades to Desoto 652 E 2.00% 764 0 652 VBR to Randall Blvd 410 N 2.00% 480 51 461 0 0 c Cn m 0 TABLE 4 2027 ROADWAY LINK VOLUMEXAPACITY ANALYSIS 2027 2027 2027 2027 2027 2019 Peak Hour AUIR Peak Hr Project Project Build -Out Serv. Vol. Build -Out Build -Out Peak Hour PK Direction Bkgd PK Dir Pk Hr Prjct Pk Hr Prjct Peak Hour Pk Hr Peak Hour Peak Hour PK Direction Background Pk Backgrnd Enter Enter Exit Exit PK Dir PK Dir PK Direction PK Dir jvphpd) (Vphpd) Dir LOS (vph) Dir v( phpd) Dir v(_ pbpd) of phod) vlc Ratio LOS 44.0 Immokalee Rd C.R. 951 to Wilson Blvd 2050 2938 E E 90 E 67 W 3028 3300 0.92 E 45.a Wilson Blvd to Randall 2460 3367 EIN F 188 EIN 150 WIS 3555 3300 1.08 F 45.b Randall to Oil Well 2460 3367 N F 125 S 125 N 3492 3300 1.06 F 46.0 oil Well to S.R. 29 460 630 N D 19 S 18 N 648 900 0.72 D Vanderbilt BR C R. 951 to Wilson Blvd NIA 767 E C evil E 37 W 818 1200 0.68 C 118.0 Wilson Blvd Immokalee Rd to Golden Gate 350 410 N B N 83 N 508 2000 0.25 B 119.0 Oil Well Road Immokalee to Everglades 840 1235 E B 79 W 80 E 1315 2000 0.66 D 120.0 Everglades to Desoto 390 574 W B :. W 51 E 627 2000 0.31 C 132.a Randall Blvd Immokalee Rd to 3th Street 810 949 E B 66 W 72 E 1021 2000 0.51 B 132.b 8th Street to Everglades 810 949 E F 53 W 57 E 1006 900 1.12 F 133.0 Everglades to Desoto 652 764 E D 13 W 14 E 778 900 0.86 D 135.1.b Everglades Blvd VBR to Randall Blvd 410 480 N B N 29 S 506 800 0.63 C Note 1.Immokalee Road is a constrained road and by 2030 will operate below adopted LOS without Randall Curve MPUD Traffic. The funded E{C Network (Vanderbilt Beach Road Extension) will reduce traffic demand on Immokalee Road. Collier staff & BCC have indicated that VBR Ext. will provide relief to Immokalee Road. 2. Randall will operate at LOS F without Randall Curve MPUD Traffic. The construction of 8th & 16th Street Bridges and VBR Ext will reduce traffic demand on Randall Boulevard. Notes No. 1 No. 1 No. 2 0 0 c Cn m 0 DocuSign Envelope ID: 71C9B826-5D7A-44BF-BC53-5A478858947B Appendix 10 DocuSign Envelope ID: 71C9B826-5D7A-44BF-BC53-5A478858947B JAB TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING, INC. TRAFFIC/TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING & PLANNING SERVICES TRAFFIC IMPACT STATEMENT METHODOLOGY REPORT For Randall Curve MPUD (Collier County, Florida) April 17, 2020 Coun4y TIS Review Fees TIS Methodology Review Fee = $500, 00 TIS (Small -Scale Study) Review Fee =$1, 500.00 Prepared by: JMB TRANSP❑RTATI❑N ENGINEERING, INC. 471 1 7TH AVENUE SW NAPLES, I LORIDA 341 1 9 CERTIFICATE or AUTHORIZATION NO. 27830 (PROJECT NO. 1 91 01 1 ) 1 JAMES BANKk 01 FLOR REG. No.°�a,,l_. PM S A ►' 7� rVRr r� O 4 � 3g60 Zoz o ffI DocuSign Envelope ID: 71C9B826-5D7A-44BF-BC53-5A478858947B APPENDIX A INITIAL MEETING CHECKLIST Suggestion: Use this Appendix as a worksheet to ensure that no important elements are overlooked. Cross out the items that do not apply. Date:4-17-2020 Time: Location: Collier County Government Offices (North Horseshoe Drive) People Attending: Name, Organization, and Telephone Numbers 1) James M. Banks, JMB Transportation Engineering, Inc., 239-919-2767 2) Michael Sawyer, Collier County Government 3) 4) Study Preparer: Preparer's Name and Title: James M, Banks, P.E., President Organization: JMB Transportation Engineering Inc. Address & Telephone Number: 4711 7th Avenue SW Naples, Florida 34119 239 -919- 2767 Reviewers) Reviewer's Name & Title: Michael Sawyer Collier County Transportation Division Applicant: Applicant's Name: Address: Telephone Number: Proposed Development: Name: Randall Curve MPUD Location: Northwest corner of Randall Boulevard and Imrnokalee Road Land Use Type: Multi -Family (400 dwelling units which can be converted to Single - Family units within PM peak hour trips cap allowance) and 150,000 s.f- of Commercial Retail/Office) ITE Code #: LUC 220 and LUC 820 Proposed number of development units: Multi -Family (400 dwelling units which can be converted to Side -Family units within PM peak hour trips can allowance) and 150,000 s.f. of Commercial Retail/Office) Other: Description: Zoning: ENizting. Vacant C.iUsomVmb$MDaskfop1COUIE'AIf9l&f I Randal! -K)Lnaing T1SWAodo1ogyRepaf.dx M2 DocuSign Envelope ID: 71C9B826-5D7A-44BF-BC53-5A478858947B Comprehensive plan recommendation: Requested: Findings of the Preliminary Study: See the attached Study Type: Major TIS Study Area: Boundaries: Based upon the County's 2%, 2% & 3% impact rule. See attached Additional intersections to be analyzed: Horizon Year(s): 2027 Analysis Time Period(s): PM Peak Future Off -Site Developments: None Source of Trip Generation Rates: ITE Trip Generation Manual, 1 Oth Edition (Table 1) Reductions in Trip Generation Rates: Pass -by trips: Internal trips (PUD): Transmit use: Other: Horizon Year Roadway Network Improvements: Collier County's 5-year CIE - Methodology & Assumptions: Non -site traffic estimates: See Attached Site -trip generation: See Table 1 Trip distribution method: Based upon manual assignment See Table 2 & Figure 2A and Figure 2B Traffic assignment method: Traffic growth rate: Per Collier County Historical & Current AUIR Reports, but not less than 2% or background or vested tips method whichever is greater. C:1�Isersljmbsu>�zskioplGO[L1ERI19iQ11 Randall GPM=ing UWelh0dakx2Repoif 6x (43 DocuSign Envelope ID: 71C9B826-5D7A-44BF-BC53-5A478858947B Special Features: (from preliminary study or prior experience) Accidents locations: Sight distance: Queuing: Access location & configuration: Traffic control: Signal system location & progression needs: On -site parking needs: Data Sources: Base maps: Prior study reports: Access policy and jurisdiction: Review process: Requirements: Miscellaneous: Small Scale Study — No Fee Minor Study - $750.00 Major Study - $1500.00 X Includes 2 intersections Additional Intersections - $500.00 each None All fees will be agreed to during the Methodology meeting and must be paid to Transportation prior to our sign -off on the application. SIGNATURES Study Preparer Reviewers Applicant C:1llsefSlJmfi5W�l7esN(optCOLLfEl�is7lilt Kanuail GPwonog TISIMefhndOfOf}yR9p0lf.dOG M4 DocuSign Envelope ID: 71C9B826-5D7A-44BF-BC53-5A478858947B 0 Desoto Boulevard �_l - — Evergludes BWd 1 o 0l 1 = 1 Bth Street NE C. _I c al I o I I 8ih Street NE 5�► � I 1 °" I w, a I 35% 1 o � I m of n � 0 r g 0 z MOM h woodcrest I �' Z rl I 1-57,,� 20% Collier Boulevard (CR 951) r 1 P N b\ rc Logon Baukvard�♦_I �� Sanfa Barbara Bouisva . P Bo , m ( 5 I I-75 Bonito Gm Ur 10% — 0 �175 I v ra � L� 3% NAL �� Wngston Rood : r r mI rk — t 1 ( 1 ► 14 0 LEGEND Airport Puling Rd 001 Residential Traffic Distribution � Randall Curve MPUD 1 17, 2020 aAMTRAN5PORTATION ENGINEERING, INC. RESIDENTIAL LAND USE PROJECT -GENERATED FIGURE 2A TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION 145 DocuSign Envelope ID: 71C9B826-5D7A-44BF-BC53-5A478858947B v � 5 w Desoto Boulevard 2�=� rc E n- E � O % �► �► Everglades Blvd �I b nI m #I 161h t !tE a m 0 �I �I N a. 5% o d Sth Sheet NE o Ls 4" Wilson Boule ard El I �I al a) n o 1 Q2 Massey k Woederest I S r l r L o � � ! Golfer Boulevard (951, _ � �- ce I I al I P I m NI K L I �+Logon RaulbvaRf� ' KI $all=a Ba =fa BWIOYU —+ m I E `Y GI EI ml • � 13vn1w Gmnt Or c 1 75 I ae Livingston Rood �r _ _ _Lrn�ericl Pa r T tirport Pulling Rd LEGEND r a�� commei ciol Traffic DisU ibuLion Randall Curve MPUD ri l 17, 2020 JMTRANSP❑RTATI❑N ENGINEERING, INC. COMMERCIAL LAND USE PROJECT -GENERATED FIGURE 213 TRAFFIC DISTRIBUTION M6 DocuSign Envelope ID: 71C9B826-5D7A-44BF-BC53-5A478858947B TABLE 1A TRIP GENERATION COMPUTATIONS Randall Curve PUD Residential Trips Land Use Code Land Use Description Maximum Build Schedule 220 Multi -Family (See Footnote No. 1) 400 Units Code Trip Period Trip Generation Equation_ Total Trips Trips Enter/Exit LUC 220 Daily Traffic (ADT) = T = 7.56(X) - 40.86 = 2,983 ADT AM Peak Hour = Ln(T) = 0.95Ln(X)-0.51 = 178 vph 41 / 137 vph 23% Enter/ 77% Exit = PM Peak Hour = Ln(T) = 0.89Ln(X)-0.02 = 203 vph 128 / 75 vph 63% Enter/ 37% Exit = Total Commercial Internal Capture Trips (5%) Internal Daily Traffic (ADT) = (Refer to Table 1B) 297 ADT Internal AM Peak Hour (vph) = (Refer to Table 1B) 9 vph 5 / 4 vph Internal PM Peak Hour (vph) = (Refer to Table 1B) 28 vph 14 / 14 vph Total Residential External Trips New External Daily Traffic (ART) = 2,686 ADT New External AM Peak Hour (vph) = 170 vph 36 / 134 vph New External PM Peak Hour (vph) = 175 vph 114 / 61 vph F—t—to No. 1 - Multi -family units may be converted to single-family units but the Residential External Trips cannot exceed 175 PM two-way trips. All DocuSign Envelope ID: 71C9B826-5D7A-44BF-BC53-5A478858947B TABLE 1B TRIP GENERATION COMPUTATIONS Randall Curve PUD Commercial Trips Land Use Code Land Use Description 820 Shopping Center Code Trip Period LUC 820 Daily Traffic (ADT) _ AM Peak Hour (vph) _ PM Peak Hour (vph) = New Daily Traffic (ADT) = New AM Peak Hour (vph) = New PM Peak Hour (vph) = Maximum Build Schedule 150,000 s.f. Trio Generation Equation Ln(T) = 0.68Ln(X)+5.57 = T = 0.5(X)+151.78= 62% Enter/ 38% Exit = Ln(T) = 0.74Ln(X)+2.89 = 48% Enter/ 52% Exit = (ADT) x (% of New Trips) (AM) x (% of New Trips) 62% Enter/ 38% Exit = (PM) x (% of New Trips) 48% Enter/ 52% Exit = Total Commercial Internal Capture Trips (5%) Internal Daily Traffic (ADT) _ Internal AM Peak Hour (vph) _ Internal PM Peak Hour (vph) = Total Commercial External Trips Total Trips Trips Enter/Exit 7,921 ADT 227 vph 141 / 86 vph 734 vph 352 / 381 vph 25% Pass -by Rate 5,941 170 105 / 65 vph 550 264 / 286 vph 297 ADT 9 vph 5 / 4 vph 28 vph 14 / 14 vph New External Daily Traffic (ADT) = 5,643 ADT New External AM Peak Hour (vph) = 162 vph 100 / 61 vph New External PM Peale Hour (vph) = 523 vph 250 / 272 vph Total External Trips New External Daily Traffic (ADT) = New External AM Peak Hour (vph) = New External PM Peak Hour (vph) = 8,330 ADT 331 vph 136 / 195 vph 699 vph 364 / 334 vph Zr Res. Project Traffic Peak Direction (vphpd)= Com. Project Traffic Peak Direction (vphpd) = 17.0 Golden Gate Blvc Collier Blvd to Wilson 123.0 Wilson to 18th Street 123.1 18th Street to Everglades Blvd 30.1 County Road 951 Immokalee Rd to Vanderbilt Rd 30.2 Vanderbilt to Golden Gate 31.1 Golden Gate Blvd to Pine Ridge 31.2 Pine Ridge to Green Blvd 41.2 Immokalee Road Goodlette-Frank to Airport 42.1 Airport Road to Livingston Rd 42.2 Livingston Rd to 1-75 43.1 1-75 to Logan Blvd 43.2 Logan Blvd to C.R. 951 44.0 C.R. 951 to Wilson Blvd 45.a Wilson Blvd to Randall 45.b Randall to Oil Well 46.0 Oil Well to S.R. 29 50.0 Logan Blvd Immokalee Rd to Vanderbilt 111.1 Vanderbilt BR Airport Rd to Livingston Rd 111.2 Livingston to Logan Blvd 112.0 Logan Blvd to C.R. 951 C.R. 951 to Wilson Blvd Wilson to Everglades Blvd 118.0 Wilson Blvd Immokalee Rd to Golden Gate Blvd 119.0 Oil Well Road Immokalee to Everglades 120.0 Everglades to Desoto 121.1 Desoto to Oil Well Grade 121.2 Oil Well Grade to Ave Maria 132.a Randall Blvd Immokalee Rd to 8th Street 132.10 8th Street to Everglades 133.0 Everglades to Desoto 135.1.a Everglades Blvd Golden Gate Blvd to VBR 135.1.b VBR to Randall Blvd 136.0 Oil Well Rd to Immokalee Rd 138.a Desoto Blvd Randall to Oil Well 138.b Golden Gate Blvd to Randall TABLE 2 PROJECT'S AREA OF IMPACT 114 Enterint 61 Exiting 250 Enterint 272 Exiting LOS Service Res PK Directioi Project Road lerv. Vo Volume Traffic Class LOS v( phpd) % Dist. 4D D 2300 5% 4D D 2300 0% 4D D 2300 0% 6❑ E 3000 10% 6D E 3000 15% 6D E 3000 20% 6D E 3000 11 % 6D E 3100 4% 6❑ E 3100 17% 6D/8D E 3500 20% 6D/8D E 3500 35% 6D E 3200 35% 6D E 3300 50% 6D E 3300 85% 6D E 3300 15% 2U D 900 5% 211.1 D 1000 7% 6D E 3000 10% 6D E 3000 13% 6D E 3000 20% 2LD D 1200 30% 2U D 1000 0% 4D D 2000 35% 4D D 2000 10% 4D D 2000 10% 4D D 2000 10% 4D D 2000 10% 4D D 2000 0% 21.1 D 900 0% 2U D 900 0% 211-1 D 800 0% 211-1 D 800 0% 211-1 D 800 0% 211-1 D 800 0% 2U D 800 0% Res. Pro. Res. Pro Pk Hr IN Hr PK Dir Non-PK vhd (Ki 6 3 0 0 0 0 11 6 17 9 23 12 13 7 5 2 19 10 23 12 40 21 40 21 57 31 97 52 17 9 6 3 8 4 11 6 15 8 23 12 34 18 0 0 40 21 11 6 11 6 11 6 11 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Com Project Traffic % Dist. 13% 2% 2% 3% 3% 2% 1% 1% 1% 2% 3% 5% 10% 30% 40% 5% 1% 1% 1% 2% 5% 3% 20% 25% 15% 10% 7% 25% 20% 10% 5% 10% 5% 1% 5% 0 0 U) m 0 m 0 -0 m 0 Com. ProCom. Pro Project Project Pk Hr Pk Hr Pk Hr Non -Pk PK Dir Non-PK PK Dir PK Dir Impact W Percent 3ignific, N v h d (vph) v( phpd) v( phpd) Stand Impact Ini �n 35 33 38 38 3% 1.66% NO y 5 5 5 5 3% 0.22% NO 5 5 5 5 3% 0.22% NO 8 8 19 14 3% 0.63% NO n 8 8 25 17 3% 0.82% NO w 5 5 28 18 3% 0.93% NO 3 3 16 10 3% 0.53% NO 3 3 8 5 3% 0.26% co NO Q10 3 3 22 13 3% 0.71 % NO 5 5 28 17 3% 0.79% NO 00 8 8 48 29 3% 1.37% NO 14 13 53 35 3% 1.66% NO 27 25 82 58 3% 2.48% YES 82 75 172 134 3% 5.21 % YES 109 100 118 117 3%v 3.57% YES 14 13 19 17 3% 2.11 % YES 3 3 11 7 3% 1.10% NO 3 3 14 9 3% 0.46% NO 3 3 18 11 3% 0.60% NO 5 5 28 17 3% 0.93% NO 14 13 47 32 3% 3.89% YES 8 8 8 8 3% 0.75% NO 54 50 90 75 3% 4.50% YES 68 63 74 74 2% 3.70% YES 41 38 49 47 2% 2.45% YES 27 25 36 33 2% 1.82% NO 19 18 29 25 2% 1.45% NO 68 63 68 63 3% 3.40% YES 54 50 54 50 3% 6.040/c YES 27 25 27 25 2% 3.02% YES 14 13 14 13 3% 1.700/c NO 27 25 27 25 3% 3.40% YES 14 13 14 13 2% 1.70% NO 3 3 3 3 2% 0.34% NO 14 13 14 13 2% 1.70% NO 44.0 lmmokalee Road 45. a 45. b 46.0 Vanderbilt BR 118.0 Wilson Blvd 119.0 Oil Well Road 1200, 132.a Randall Blvd 132.b 133.0 135,1.b Everglades Blvd Q TABLE 3 2019 & 2027 ROADWAY LINK VOLUMES Per Vested Trips Methc Per Growth Rate Method 2027 2027 Peak Hour 2019 Growth Peak Hour PK Direction AUIR AUIR Rate PK Direction Trip Background Traffic Pk per Background Bank Per Vested Trips vt php ) DiR. AUIR v( phpo) v( ohgdl vl Dhod) C.R. 951 to Wilson Blvd 2050 E 3.52% 2704 888 2933 Wilson Blvd to Randall 2460 EIN 4.00% 3367 364 2824 Randall to Oil Well 2460 EIN 4.00% 3367 364 2824 Oil Weli to S.R. 29 460 N 4.00% 630 152 612 C.R. 951 to Wilson Blvd NIA E NIA 767 NIA NIA lmmokalee Rd to Golden Cate Blvd 350 N 2.00% 410 1 351 Immokalee to Everglades 840 E 4.94% 1235 352 1192 Everglades to Desoto 390 W 2.00% 457 184 574 lmmokalee Rd to 8th Street 810 E 2.00% 949 26 836 8th Street to Everglades 810 E 2.00% 949 26 836 Everglades to Desoto 652 E 2.00% 764 0 652 VBR to Randall Blvd 410 N 2.00% 480 51 461 0 0 c Cn 0 m CD 0 0 0 c Cn 0 TABLE 4 m CD 2027 ROADWAY LINK VOLUMEICAPACITY ANALYSIS 0 CD a V 2027 2027 2027 2027 2027 0 2019 Peak Hour AUIR Peak Hr Project Project Build -Out Serv. Vol. Build -Out Build -Out 00 Peak Hour PK Direction Bkgd PK Dir Pk Hr Prjct Pk Hr Prjct Peak Hour Pk Hr Peak Hour Peak Hour ro rn PK Direction Background Pk Backgrnd PK Dir Pk Non-PK Dii Non -Pk PK Dir PK Dir PK Direction PK Dir o v h d v h d Dir LOS v J(r nh d) Dir (vph) Dir v( phnd) v( uhpd) vIc Ratio LOS Notes D 44.0 Immokalee Road C.R. 951 to Wilson Blvd 2050 2938 E E 82 E 58 W 3020 3300 0.92 E co 45.a Wilson Blvd to Randall 2460 3367 EIN F 172 EIN 134 W/S 3539 3300 1.07 F No. 1 W 45.b Randall to Oil Well 2460 3367 EIN F 117 EIN 118 WIS 3484 3300 1.06 F No. 1 w 46.0 Oil Well to S.R. 29 460 630 N D 19 S 17 N 646 900 0.72 DOD D V Vanderbilt BR C.R. 951 to Wilson Blvd NIA 767 E C 47 E 32 W 814 1200 0.68 C co co cm 118.0 Wilson Blvd Immokalee Rd to Golden Gate 350 410 N B 90 N 75 S 500 2000 0.25 B o 119.0 oil Well Road Immokalee to Everglades 840 1235 E B 74 E 74 W 1309 2000 0.65 D 120.0 Everglades to Desoto 390 574 W B 49 E 47 W 621 2000 0.31 C 132.a Randall Blvd lmmokalee Rd to 8th Street 810 949 E B 63 E 68 W 1012 2000 0.51 B 132.b 8th Street to Everglades 810 949 E F 50 E 54 W 999 900 1.11 F No. 2 133.0 Everglades to Desoto 652 764 E D 25 E 27 W 789 900 0.88 D 135A.b Everglades Blvd VBR to Randall Blvd 410 480 N B 25 N 27 S 505 800 0.63 C Note 1.Immokalee Road is a constrained road and by 2030 will operate below adopted LOS without Hyde Park Traffic. The funded E+C Network (Vanderbilt Beach Road Extension) will reduce traffic demand on Immoka[ee Road. Collier staff & BCC have indicated that VBR Ext. will provide relief to Immokalee Road. 2. Randall will operate at LOS F without Randall Curve MPUD Traffic. The construction of 8th & 16th Street Bridges and VBR Ext will reduce traffic demand on Randall Boulevard. Immokalee Road/4th Street N.E. Mixed Use Subdistrict (PL20190002355) Exhibit V.F Flood Zone and Wellfield Maps May 7 2020 ® GradyMinor Page 1 of 3 RCIRP-19 Exhibit VF.docx Chit Engineers • Land Surveyors • Planners • Landscape Architects Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, FL 34134 • 239-947-1144 • engineering@gradyminor.com • www.gradyminor.com Flood Zone Ma DFIRM Panel Information FIRM ID 14433 ST FIPS ] 12 PCOM M ] 21 C PANEL ] 24Q SUFFIX ]E- FIRM PAN] 12421r-0240H PANELTYPE COUNTYWIDE, PANEL PRINTED EFF DATE 5{16{2012 0 Subject Property — Flood Zones AH-14.50, 15 and 15.50, X and X500 Fema Flood Zones FEMA 2011 ❑ A ❑ AE AH ■ VE ❑ X ■ X50fl May 7, 2020 ® GradyMinor Page 2 of 3 RCIRP-19 Exhibit VF.docx Civil Engineers • hand Surveyors • Planners • Landscape Architects Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, FL 34134 • 239-947-1144 • engineering@gradyminor.com • www.gradyminor.com Wellfield Ma ray Hallow 131--1 1,U . Are NW n 415SAve NE nth Ave NW � -nth A,re NE 311h Ave ►IW 3Ph A 35rhAviv NW Ave NF r 337d AV.0 hFW 33ra A%R NF aa�l�c -�a t V {: 4 uJ O` CwH tr Fn 25tn Avt 74W u 4'b're 0! ` eve tri Ba4 In d RtAve Wf 241hAae N PoIIution Control W-91Ifielids 2z r,d a 22 n Information 20thAve uw ie� Label 20-TEAR u A F WF2007 T.,W-4 18ihAve ter Wellfield GOLDEN GATE WELL FIELD 'ram BII,rd W JLIT Ordinance ORD. 10-23 1611 $QMI 20.02 141h Ave 44 144 h AVe NE 41912020, 9: t2:12 AM 1:36-112 a 0.28 0.55 1.11vi 2004 WelEfields a 0.42 o_es 1.7 km ❑ Planned Unit Development Source Esn HERE. C-11r, r—,r p inname-[ P C— GEIRM LISO , FAO RFS NRCAN. C ai IGPL Kalk;kl NL Cr]7 5utby, Ev Japan. METI. Esn China I}'lor� I, fo} OMSucclMap oorYtulara, XW Subject Property Carkr Cana SJen-C'M' or Z«vng Nap May 7, 2020 ® GradyMinor Page 3 of 3 RCIRP-19 Exhibit VF.docx Civi] ERglneers • hand Surveyors • Planners • Landscape Architects Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, FL 34134 • 239-947-1144 • engineering@gradyminor.com • www.gradyminor.com Immokalee Road/4th Street N.E. Mixed Use Subdistrict (PL20190002355) Exhibit V.G3 Warranty Deed(s) May 7, 2020 ® GradyMinor Exhibit Cover Pages. docx CM] Fngfneers • band Surveyors • Planners • Landscape Architects Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, FL 34134 • 239-947-1144 • engineering@gradyminor.com • www.gradyminor.com CORRECTIVE STATUTORY DEED THIS IS A CORRECTIVE STATUTORY DEED TO CORRECT DEED PREVIOUSLY RECORDED IN O.R. BOOK 3930, PAGE 0356 WHICH CONTAINED A SCRIVENER'S ERROR IN THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION THIS DEED made this day of 2006, by COLLIER COUNTY , A POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OFf THE ISTATE OF FLORIDA, BY ITS BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, ACTING IN THEIR CAPACITY AS TRUSTEE OF THE GAC LAND TRUST, having a mailing address of 3301 East Tamiami Trail, Naples, Florida 34112, hereinafter called the Grantor, to COLLIER COUNTY, A POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOR AND ON BEHALF OF THE PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT OF COLLIER COUNTY, having a mailing address of 3300 Santa Barbara Boulevard, Naples, Florida 34116 , hereinafter called the Grantee. (Wherever used herein the t0 this instrument and their rese assigns.) WITNESSETH: That theI G Dollars ($10.00) and tithe /-", acknowledged, hereby grants tea confirms unto the Grantee rballlihat ar ')"Grantee" include all the parties to irs, legi ,,sentatives, successors and tion of the sum of Ten pt whereof is hereby , releases, conveys and County, Florida, to wit: All of Tract "A", Golden Gate),�`st es, Unit 22, accord�rl tglhe plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 7, Pages 83 and 1-41ho Public Recgic f Collier County, Florida, LESS n AND EXCEPT that portion coe-§tfiA D" ed and recorded in O.R. Book 3080, Page 072�, as corrected. Subject to easements, restrictions, and reservations of record. WITNESSETH that Grantee agrees and warrants that the Lands shall be utilized solely by the Grantee for the primary purpose of providing a neighborhood park in Golden Gate Estates. Grantor agrees to, and acknowledges that the Grantee may exchange these Lands for other like property or properties where said exchange of land will allow the Grantee to assemble other properties that may be better suited and physically located for the development of a park facility within the Orange Tree area and this exchange of Land will meet the primary purpose of providing a neighborhood park. Grantee and any subsequent owners created by virtue of an exchange of said Lands shall be required to submit all plans to the Golden Gate Estates Land Trust Committee ("Committee") for approval of the proposed development of the Lands to ensure that the proposed development is complementary and esthetically pleasing to the immediate surrounding Orange Tree community. In the event the Lands cease to be utilized by the grantee in accordance with the aforementioned restrictions and limitations, said Lands shall automatically revert back to Grantor. 3878085 OR: 4079 PG: 1356 RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL 07/28/2006 at 09:38AK DWIGHT E. BROCI, CLERK RBC FBI 18.50 COPIES 2.00 Retn: CLERK TO THE BOARD INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR EYT 7240 *** OR; 4079 PG; 1357 *** IN WITNESS WHEREOF the said Grantor has caused these presents to be executed in its name by its Board of County Commissioners acting by Chairman or Vice Chairman of said Board, the day and year aforesaid. ATTEST: DWIQIJT• ROCK Clerk r Apmt as .to Chairs" s BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA By: Frank Halas, Chairman Approve as to form and legal sufficiency By. Ellen T. Chadwell, Assistant County Attorney '< , CORRECTIVE STATUTORY DEED THIS IS A CORRECTIVE STATUTORY DEED TO CORRECT THAT CERTAIN DEED PREVIOUSLY RECORDED IN O.R. BOOK 3080, PAGE 0723 WHICH CONTAINED A SCRIVENER'S ERROR IN THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION THIS DEED made this Z5k day of J 4L 2006, by COLLIER COUNTY , A POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THE S ATE OF FLORIDA, BY ITS BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, ACTING IN THEIR CAPACITY AS TRUSTEE OF THE GAC LAND TRUST, having a mailing address of 3301 East Tamiami Trail, Naples, Florida 34112, hereinafter called the Grantor, to COLLIER COUNTY, A POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, having a mailing address of 3301 East Tamiami Trail, Naples, Florida 34112 , hereinafter called the Grantee. (Wherever used herein the terms "Grantor" and "Grantee" include all the parties to this instrument and their respective heirs, legal representatives, successors and assigns.) WITNESSETH: That the G Dollars ($10.00) and other vF acknowledged, hereby grants,,-,,-,' confirms unto the Grantee, at t that See attached Subject to �r�a cl in, consideration of the sum of Ten -��hi to#oq, receipt whereof is hereby sells, ale N ises, releases, conveys and I and situate i Cier County, Florida, to wit: by reference. of record. Vill WITNESSETH that Grad 6 , c rees and warran, mat the Lands shall be utilized E for the purpose of road ngh 'aw ata. totem bvter retention required for the Immokalee Road improvements. s w IN WITNESS WHEREOF the said Grantor has caused these presents to be executed in its name by its Board of County Commissioners acting by Chairman or Vice Chairman of said Board, the day and year aforesaid. ATTE$T' DWIGHT E. BROOK, Clerk as to Mffiw I 104tw--e onl M BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA By:�/ Frank Halas, Chairman Approveo as to form and legal sufficiency By: Jt�� U Ellen T. Chadwell, Assistant County Attorney 3878086 OR; 4079 PG; 1358 RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS Of COLLIER COUNTY, FL 07/28/2006 at 09:38AK DWIGHT I. BROCK, CLERK RIC FBI 27.00 COPIES 3.00 Retn: CLERK TO THE BOARD INTEROFFICE 4TH EYT 7240 FLOOR % OR: 4079 PG: 1359 F711 I 11 1 1 1 � III L: S 89*40'50" E 1431.09'* N J" 00 Iw NOT TO SCALE z 041 10 III z LU m cc d Z /427/ ILU.-ji V) J . . . ....... t L2...... ... f, '�!AIINE TABLE /� //` >< BEARING IN L N0019'10"E V S89*10*40"E '3 381.66 S00119'10"w 50 N -10 1 S89*40'50"E I :,7 CURVE TABLE CURVE RADIUS I DELTA ARC LENGTHICH6'R-D- BEARING CHORD C, 27691!� 47*15*40" 1 2284.69 1 N2546-4 - 2220.47 L C24 7.W 2 2814.931 59-08-25- 1 9905 55 1 W 27�8.27 S 31 *1 9'27"W P.O.B. f3AND-A L. B11ULF-YARr) - — - — - — 1W' RW EASEUENT S-M. (FOR THE FIRM) Nt - — -- — -- — -- — -- — -- — -- — -- — -- — -- — -- — -- — FLA. LIC. 70. NOT VALID WITHOUT THE SIGNATURE AND THE ORIGINAL RAISED SEAL OF A FLORIDA LICENSED SURVEYOR AND MAPPER EXHIBIT D REV 1) REVISED CURVES, DISTANCES AND ACREAGE TMO 1/06 FOR: COUM COUNTY TRANVORTATION SERVM This is NOT a Survey. SI(ETCH & DESCRIPTION OF m�-- —"04anum. SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 48 S., RANGE 27 E., fto". owhffm. COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA am#&= -"ftftftjm"w- TAU CODE: DRAWN BY: ICHKED BY: CAD FILE: PROJECT NO: SHEET NG INDEX NO. Tm 04014-01-000 1 1 OF 2 IR-L-179 Jon 04, 2006 — 10:39:46 T0S80RNEjX-.\SlJR\040I Parcel 179,d g w w *** OR: 4079 PG: 1360 *** Description: A portion of Tract "A", Golden Gate Estates, Unit 22, according to the plot thereof as recorded in Plot Book 7, Page 84, Collier County, Florida, being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the Southwesterly Corner of said Tract "A"; thence North 0019'10" East, along the westerly boundary of said Tract "A", which is also the centerline of 4th Street N.E., for a distance of 761.88 feet; thence South 89'10'40" East, for a distance of 426.54 feet; thence South 00'19'10" West, a distance of 381.66 feet, to a point on o circular curve, concave Northwesterly, whose radius point bears North 40'35'28" West, a distance of 2,769.79 feet therefrom; thence run Northeasterly, along the arc of said curve to the left, having a radius of 2,769.79 feet, through a central angle of 47'15'40". subtended by a chord of 2,220.47 feet at a bearing of North 25'46'42" East, for an arc length of 2,284.69 feet to the end of said curve, and a point on the Northerly Boundary of said Tract "A"; thence South 89'40'50" East, along the Northerly Boundary of said Tract "A", for a distance of 50.10 feet to a point on a circular curve, concave Northwesterly, whose radius point bears North 88'14'45" West, a distance of 2,814.93 feet therefrom; thence run Southwesterly, along the arc of said curve to the right, having a radius of 2,814.93 feet, through a central angle of 59'08'25", subtended by a chord of 2.778.27 feet at a bearing of South 31'19'27" West, for an arc length of 2,905.55 feet, to the POINT OF BEGINNING; Containing 9.1208 acres, more or less. w„ g Notes: 1. This is not a survey. m w ` I 2. Basis of bearing is plot. h ' s n MarL 3. Subject to easements, servolions on'd restctionS of , record. 4. Not valid without Sheet 1 '-i\depicting Sketch of s Description and bearing the or*i0 -signature and embossed seal of a Florida registvi Ted p veep tyfapper. 5. All dimensions are plot unless otherwise noted. 6. 0 Note should be taken that on the plat of Golden Gote Estates, Unit 22, a 30' deficiency occurs in the block containing Tracts 110-125, and Tract "A", and a 30' overage occurs in the block containing 78-109, and this is reflected in the calculations concerning this parcel. 7. This is a revision of a sketch & description created by Wilkison & Associates which merged with WilsonMiller effective 7-1-02 REV 1) REVISED CURVES. DISTANCES AND ACREAGE TMO 1/06 FOR: COLDER COUNTY TRANSPORTATION Somats This is NOT a Survey. SKITCH & D1it.SCRli1'TION OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 48 S., RANGE 27 E., ""'•&*A"•"'""•'&•-+�-4i+� COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA Mvbft&amM AP0 ,4 TASK CODE: DRAWN BY; CHKED BY: CAO FILE: PROJECT NO: SHEET DRAWING INDEX NO: REV: TYO I WH IR-L-179 N014-001-ONO 1 2 of 2 1 IR-L-179 ion U4, ZUU6 — 10:41:51 T0S80RNEIX:\SUR\04014\Parcel 179.dwq to] ZU111r;Lei NCAW*] V FOR PETITION NUMBERS(S) PL20190002355 and PL20190002355 1 Richard D. Yovanovich, Esq. (print name), as Successor Trustee (title, if applicable) of the Golden Gate Boulevard West Trust (company, If applicable), swear or affirm under oath, that I am the (choose one) owner= applicant=contract purchaser and that: 1. I have full authority to secure the approval(s) requested and to impose covenants and restrictions on the referenced property as a result of any action approved by the County in accordance with this application and the Land Development Code; 2. All answers to the questions in this application and any sketches, data or other supplementary matter attached hereto and made a part of this application are honest and true; 3. 1 have authorized the staff of Collier County to enter upon the property during normal working hours for the purpose of investigating and evaluating the request made through this application; and that 4. The property will be transferred, conveyed, sold or subdivided subject to the conditions and restrictions imposed by the approved action. 5. Well authorize Coleman, Yovanovich & Koester, P.A. and Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. to act as our/my representative in any matters regarding this petition including 1 through 2 above. *Notes: • If the applicant is a corporation, then it is usually executed by the corp. pres. or v. pres. • If the applicant is a Limited Liability Company (L.L.C.) or Limited Company (L.C.), then the documents should typically be signed by the Company's "Managing Member." • If the applicant is a partnership, then typically a partner can sign on behalf of the partnership. • If the applicant is a limited partnership, then the general partner must sign and be identified as the "general partner" of the named partnership. • If the applicant is a trust, then they must include the trustee's name and the words "as trustee". • In each instance, first determine the applicant's status, e.g., individual, corporate, trust, partnership, and then use the appropriate format for that ownership. Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I have read the foregoing Affidavit of Authorization and that the facts stated in it are true. -&A �.J _,_>5!-I � July 29, 2020 Signature Date STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER The foregoing instrument was acknowleged before me by means of M physical presence or ri online notarization this 294 day of July 20 20 , by (printed name of owner or qualifier) Richard D. Yovanovich Such person(s) Notary Public must check applicable box: ED Are personally known to me M Has produced a current drivers license M Has produced Notary Signature: 44'6 ana CP\08-COA-00115\155 REV 3/4/2020 as identification. DIANNAQUINTANILLA NotaryPublic- StateofFlorida ,. Commission., GG 142591 My CExpires Sep 13, 2021 omm. Acrded through National Notary Assn, AFFIDAVIT OF AUTHORIZATION FOR PETITION NUMBERS(S) PL20190002355 and PL20190002356 1 Richard D. vovanovich, Esq. (print name), as Successor Trustee applicable) of Land Trust 850.024 under Land Trust Agreement dated December 1, 2005 (company, If ap IICa under oath, that I am the (choose one) owner0applicantF--Jcontract purchaseran (title, if ble), swear or affirm d that: 1. I have full authority to secure the approval(s) requested and to impose covenants and restrictions on the referenced property as a result of any action approved by the County in accordance with this application and the Land Development Code; 2. All answers to the questions in this application and any sketches, data or other supplementary matter attached hereto and made a part of this application are honest and true; 3. 1 have authorized the staff of Collier County to enter upon the property during normal working hours for the purpose of investigating and evaluating the request made through this application; and that 4. The property will be transferred, conveyed, sold or subdivided subject to the conditions and restrictions imposed by the approved action. 5. We/I authorize Coleman, Yovanovich & Koester, P.A. and Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. to act as our/my representative in any matters regarding this petition including 1 through 2 above. `Notes: • if the applicant is a corporation, then it is usually executed by the corp. pres. or v. pres. • If the applicant is a Limited Liability Company (L.L.CJ or Limited Company (L.C.), then the documents should typically be signed by the Company's "Managing Member." • If the applicant is a partnership, then typically a partner can sign on behalf of the partnership. • If the applicant is a limited partnership, then the general partner must sign and be identified as the `general partner" of the named partnership. • If the applicant is a trust, then they must include the trustee's name and the words "as trustee". • In each instance, first determine the applicant's status, e.g., individual, corporate, trust, partnership, and then use the appropriate format for that ownership. Under penalties of perjury, 1 declare that I have read the foregoing Affidavit of Authorization and that the facts stated in it are true. July 29, 2020 Signature Date STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER The foregoing instrument was acknowleged before me by means of physical presence or rl online notarization this zstn day of July 2020 , by (printed name of owner or qualifier) Richard D. vovanovich Such person(s) Notary Public must check applicable box: Are personally known to me 0 Has produced a current drivers license ® Has produced Notary Signature: Aatx2AAY_, CP\08-COA-00115\155 REV 3/4/2020 as identification. DIANNAQUINTANILLA Nota' Public - State of Florida Commission, GG 14259' My Comm. Expires Seo 13, 2021 „ 6crdedthroughNaticralkctvyAssr. AFFIDAVIT OF AUTHORIZATION FOR PETITION NUMBERS(S) PL20190002355 and PL20190002356 1 Richard D. Yovanovich, Esq. (print name), as successor Trustee (title, if applicable) of Land Trust 850.031 under Land Trust Agreement dated December 1, 2005 (company, If a licable), swear or affirm under oath, that I am the (choose one) owner applicant=contract purchasernand that: 1. I have full authority to secure the approval(s) requested and to impose covenants and restrictions on the referenced property as a result of any action approved by the County in accordance with this application and the Land Development Code; 2. All answers to the questions in this application and any sketches, data or other supplementary matter attached hereto and made a part of this application are honest and true; 3. 1 have authorized the staff of Collier County to enter upon the property during normal working hours for the purpose of investigating and evaluating the request made through this application; and that 4. The property will be transferred, conveyed, sold or subdivided subject to the conditions and restrictions imposed by the approved action. 5. Well authorize Coleman, Yovanovich & Koester, P.A. and Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. to act as our/my representative in any matters regarding this petition including 1 through 2 above. `Notes: • If the applicant is a corporation, then it is usually executed by the corp. Ares. or v. pres. • If the applicant is a Limited Liability Company (L.L.C.) or Limited Company (L.C.), then the documents should typically be signed by the Company's "Managing Member." • If the applicant is a partnership, then typically a partner can sign on behalf of the partnership. • If the applicant is a limited partnership, then the general partner must sign and be identified as the "general partner" of the named partnership. • If the applicant is a trust, then they must include the trustee's name and the words "as trustee". • In each instance, first determine the applicant's status, e.g., individual, corporate, trust, partnership, and then use the appropriate format for that ownership. Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I have read the foregoing Affidavit of Authorization and that the facts stated iin` it are true. �- v ~ July 29, 2020 Signature Date STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER The foregoing instrument was acknowleged before me by means of rxJ physical presence or F71 online notarization this 29th day of July 20 20 , by (printed name of owner or qualifier) Richard D. Yovanovich Such person(s) Notary Public must check applicable box: F1 Are personally known to me Q Has produced a current drivers license Has produced as identification. Notary Signature: Al O a 11 -Q—) QU-4izm-,/Z& CP\08-COA-00115\155 REV 3/4/2020 DIANNAQUINTANILLA .�« Nqp ar}.Ftublic - State of Porida Commission=GG 14239' ,.,., My Comm. Expires Sep 13.2021 Bcrdedthrough NationelNCtarV�'ssr. AFFIDAVIT OF AUTHORIZATION FOR PETITION NUMBERS(S) PL20190002355 and PL20190002356 1, Richard D. Yovanovich, Esq. (print name), as successor Trustee (title, if applicable) of under Land Trust Agreement Dated June 10, 2009 known as Trust Number 850.045 (company, If applicable), swear or affirm under oath, that I am the (choose one) ownerF---1applicant acontract purchaser and that: 1. I have full authority to secure the approval(s) requested and to impose covenants and restrictions on the referenced property as a result of any action approved by the County in accordance with this application and the Land Development Code; 2. All answers to the questions in this application and any sketches, data or other supplementary matter attached hereto and made a part of this application are honest and true; 3. 1 have authorized the staff of Collier County to enter upon the property during normal working hours for the purpose of investigating and evaluating the request made through this application; and that 4. The property will be transferred, conveyed, sold or subdivided subject to the conditions and restrictions imposed by the approved action. 5. Well authorize Coleman, Yovanovich & Koester, P.A. and G. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. to act as our/my representative in any matters regarding this petition including 1 through 2 above. *Notes: • If the applicant is a corporation, then it is usually executed by the corp. pres. or v. pres. • If the applicant is a Limited Liability Company (L.L.C.) or Limited Company (L.C.), then the documents should typically be signed by the Company's "Managing Member." • If the applicant is a partnership, then typically a partner can sign on behalf of the partnership. • If the applicant is a limited partnership, then the general partner must sign and be identified as the "general partner" of the named partnership. • If the applicant is a trust, then they must include the trustee's name and the words "as trustee". • In each instance, first determine the applicant's status, e.g., individual, corporate, trust, partnership, and then use the appropriate format for that ownership. Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I have read the foregoing Affidavit of Authorization and that the facts stated in it are true. July 29, 2020 Signature Date STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER The foregoing instrument was acknowleged before me by means of ®x physical presence or rJ online notarization this 29th day of July 20 20 by (printed name of owner or qualifier) Richard D.Yovanovich Such person(s) Notary Public must check applicable box: M Are personally known to me Has produced a current drivers license Has produced CP\08-COA-00115\155 REV 3/4/2020 as identification. DIANNAQUINTAN __ Notary Public State of .' o a C6h fission-.GL �-259 MY Comm. Expires Sep 13.2C'.2l ,,,,,,, Bcnded lhreugh Natioret �ct=rq?s_r PROJECT: Randall Curve Property FOLIO NO: 37690040003 REAL ESTATE SALES AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT made and entered into this ZA-1 day of 2019, by and between the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, hereinafter referred to as "Seller" whose mailing address is 3335 Tamiami Trail East, Naples, FL 34112, and, RICHARD D. YOVANOVICH, SUCCESSOR TRUSTEE (AND NOT INDIVIDUALLY), hereinafter referred to as "Purchaser" whose mailing address is c/o Crown Management Services, LLC, 207 Cherry Hill Drive, Presto, PA 15142, WHEREAS, Seller desires to sell the 47 +1- acre parcel defined below as the County Property for a cash payment and exchange of a 10 +!_ acre parcel defined below as the Estates Shopping Property owned by Purchaser on the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth. WHEREAS, Seller shall retain a " ,seable" one -acre tract of land on the County Property to facilitate a County service building to serve the community. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the recitals, the mutual covenants hereinafter set forth and other good and valuable considerations, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby mutually acknowledged, it is agreed by and between the parties as follows. - I. RANDALL CURVE PROPERTY. The real property owned by Seller and to be sold to Purchaser, which is subject to this Agreement, (hereinafter referred to as "County Property") is located in Collier County, Florida, is commonly known as the Randall Curve Property and described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof. 2. ESTATES SHOPPING PROPERTY. The real property owned by Purchaser and to be conveyed to Sellei , which is subject to this Agreement (hereinafter referred to as "Estates Shopping Property') is located in Collier County, Florida and described on Exhibit "B" attached hereto and made a part hereof. 3. SALE CONVEYANCE and EXCHANGE. Seller agrees to sell and convey Seller's right, title and interest in and to the County Property less a one -acre uses e tract ("One -Acre Tract") to Purchaser, and Purchaser agrees to purchase the County Property from Seller at the price and upon the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth. In addition to the Purchase Price (defined below), in exchange for the County Property. Purchaser shall convey at no cost to Seller the Estates Shopping Property, at the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth. Both the County Property and the Estates Shopping are being sold in their "as is" condition. THE "AS -IS" NATURE OF THIS AGREEMENT APPLIES TO ALL ASPECTS OF BOTH THE COUNTY PROPERTY AND ESTATES SHOPPING PROPERTY. THE PARTIES ACKNOWLEDGE AND AGREE THAT THE "AS -IS" NATURE OF THIS AGREEMENT WAS THE BASIS FOR DETERMINING THE PURCHASE PRICE. THE PURCHASE PRICE FOR THE COUNTY PROPERTY IS BASED UPON LAND VALUE ONLY AND NO VALUE HAS BEEN ATTRIBUTED TO ANY STRUCTURE OR OTHER IMPROVEMENTS CONSTRUCTED ON THE COUNTY PROPERTY OR THE ESTATES SHOPPING PROPERTY NEITHER PURCHASER NOR SELL SHALL HAVE ANY MAINTENANCE OR RISK OF LOSS RESPONSIBILITIES WITH RESPECT TO THEIR RESPECTIVE PROPERTY. 4. EXECUTION OF AGREEMENT. Purchaser shall execute this Agreement in advance of submittal to the Board of County Commissioners. The date the Board of County Commissioners approve of this Agreement shall be referred to herein as the "Effective Date". 5. TITLE. Title to the County Property shall be conveyed to Purchaser by Statutory Deed and title to the Estates Shopping Property shall be conveyed to Seller by Special Warranty Deed. In addition to the foregoing, both parties agree to execute an owner's gap, construction lien and non -foreign affidavit, closing statement and all such other documentation requested by either party's attorney in order for it to obtain an owner's title insurance policy. 6. PURCHASE PRICE. The Purchase Price ("Purchase Price") for the County Property is THREE MILLION SEVEN HUNDRED FIFTY THOUSAND DOLLARS ($3,750,000), payable by Purchaser to Seller. Within three (3) business days after the Effective Date, Purchaser shall pay to Coleman, Yovanovich & Koester, P.A ("Escrow Agent"), an initial deposit in the amount of ONE HUNDRED EIGHTY-SEVEN THOUSAND, FIVE HUNDRED DOLLARS ($187,500) hereinafter referred to as ("Initial Deposit"). Prior to the end of the ninety (90) day Due Diligence Period, if Purchaser has not elected to terminate this Agreement. Purchaser shall pay to Escrow Agent an additional sum of ONE HUNDRED EIGHTY-SEVEN THOUSAND, FIVE HUNDRED DOLLARS ($187,500), hereinafter referred to as (`Second Deposit") so that the total deposit equals THREE HUNDRED SEVENTY-FIVE THOUSAND DOLLARS ($375,000) and shall be non-refundable except for Seller's default or Purchaser's failure to obtain all required County land use entitlements and all required State and Federal approvals set forth in Section 8, below. The Initial Deposit and the Second Deposit shall collectively be referred to as the "Earnest Money." The balance, after credit of the Earnest Money and any prorations and adjustments, shall be paid by PURCHASER to SELLER at closing of this transaction. 7. INPECTION PERIOD AND DUE DILIGENCE. Purchaser shall have a period of ninety (90) days from and after the Effective Date ("Due Diligence Period") to inspect the County Property, including the right to make engineering and soil tests, analyses and other investigations, and to investigate andlor review any other facts, circumstances or matters, or to perform any and all due diligence, which Purchaser deems relevant to the purchase of the County Property. This Agreement shall terminate if prior to the expiration of the Due Diligence Period, Purchaser delivers to Seller written notice that the County Property is not suitable to Purchaser for any or no reason in Purchaser's sole and absolute discretion. If Purchaser terminates this Agreement pursuant to this Section, then upon such termination, Purchaser shall receive an immediate refund of the Initial Deposit then held by Escrow Agent, and thereafter neither party shall have any further obligations to the other hereunder. 8. LAND USE ENTITLEMENT CONDITIONS. Purchaser's obligation to purchase the County Property and exchange the Estates Shopping Property is contingent upon Purchaser obtaining: (a) final approval of any rezone, and any amendment(s) to the Collier County Growth Management Plan and/or Land Development Code, as are necessary to obtain such rezone, to permit commercial and/or residential uses on the County Property acceptable to the Purchaser in Purchaser's sole and absolute discretion, and (b) an amendment to the Estates Shopping Center Sub -district and the Estates Shopping Center CPUD to eliminate the grocery store requirement and to add the County's proposed uses for essential public service to include, but not be limited to, workforce housing, senior housing, VA nursing home and an animal sanctuary. Purchaser shall work with the Seller during the entitlement process to agree upon the legal description of the One- \cre Tract and to define and develop the appropriate development standards for the One -Acre Tract. The One -Acre Tract will be fully mitigated and not required to provide preserve, open space, water quality and water quantity management within the acre and shall have access to the main access road of the development. The Purchaser will work with the Seller's representative to define development standards that reduce the setbacks and buffering to the parent parcel during the rezone process, eliminate the grocery store requirement and obtain uses on the remaining parcel between Wilson Boulevard and 151 Street Northwest acceptable to Purchaser in Purchaser's sole and absolute discretion During the entitlement process, at Purchaser's request, Seller shall execute all petitions to add the Purchaser's desired uses on the County Property including, but not limited to, a petition to amend the Collier County Growth Management Plan and a petition to rezone the County Property. The Purchaser shall use his best efforts to obtain the land use entitlements within twenty-four (24) months of the execution of this Agreement. Should the Purchaser fail to complete the entitlement process within thirty (30) months, then this Agreement shall terminate and the Earnest Money shall be returned to the Purchaser and the parties shall have no further obligations hereunder. 9 TITLE AND SURVEY EXAMINATION A Within forty-five (45) days after the Effective Date, Purchaser may obtain a title insurance commitment with respect to the County Property ("Title Commitment"), If the Title Commitment reflects that title to the County Property is subject to matters that are not acceptable to Purchaser, Purchaser shall notify Seller of Purchaser's objections to the same in writing by no later than forty-five (45) days after the Effective Date, and the same shall be treated as defect(s) ("Objections") Unless Purchaser timely delivers written notice to Seller of the Objections, Purchaser shall be deemed to accept title to the County Property in its then existing condition. Seller shall, by no later than ten (10) days from and after receipt of the Objections, provide written notice to Purchaser stating whether it will cure (or attempt to cure) the Objections, which decision shall be in Seller's sole and absolute discretion. If Seller elects to cure (or attempt to cure) the Objections, Seller shall have until the expiration of the Due Diligence Period (the "Cure Period"). If Seller does not agree to cure the Objections (or if Seller elects to attempt to cure one or more Objections, but is unable to timely cure the same prior to the expiration of the Cure Period), Purchaser shall have the option of either: (i) proceeding with this transaction in accordance with the terms and provisions hereof and accepting all title matters in their them existing condition; or (ii) terminating this transaction upon notice to Seller prior to the expiration of the Due Diligence Period, whereupon the Initial Deposit shall be returned to Purchaser, and Seller and Purchaser shall be released from any and all further obligations and liabilities arising under or out of this Agreement. Despite the foregoing, Seller shall be required to cure defects in title related to monetary items such as liens or mortgages created by Seller or as a consequence of Seller's ownership of the County Property. Between the Effective Date and Closing, neither party shall encumber their respective property with any lien or other encumbrance that is not expressly permitted or reasonably contemplated by this Agreement or that cannot be satisfied or otherwise discharged by prior to or in conjunction with Closing. B. Within forty-five (45) days after the Effective Date, Purchaser may obtain a boundary survey of the County Property ("Survey"). If Purchaser obtains the Survey, and the Survey correctly shows: (a) an encroachment onto the County Property, (b) that an improvement located on the County Property projects onto lands of others, (c) lack of legal access, or (d) encumbrances or defects, then Purchaser may provide Seller with a copy of the Survey and notify Seller of any such encroachment, encumbrance or defect and the same shall be treated as Objections and are subject to the provisions of Section 9.A, above. If Purchaser has failed to terminate the Agreement prior to the expiration of the Due Diligence Period, then Purchaser shall be deemed to have accepted all survey related matters in their existing condition. 10. PRORATIONS, ADJUSTMENTS AND CLOSING COSTS. A. The following items shall be prorated and adjusted between Seller and Purchaser as of midnight of the day preceding closing: 1. All installments or special assessments payable after the closing, whether for work commenced as of the closing or otherwise, shall be paid exclusively by Purchaser. 2. All other items required by any other provision of this Agreement to be prorated or adjusted. 3. At the closing, the amount of proration and adjustments as aforesaid shall be determined or estimated to the extent practicable and the monetary adjustment shall be made between Seller and Purchaser. All such prorations and adjustment shall be final. B. Purchaser shall pay for all costs associated with this transaction including, but not limited to all the associated costs of the land swap including zoning and use approvals, engineering, surveying, transfer, documentary taxes, and recording costs for any curative instruments. Purchaser agrees to pay the cost of publication of the legal notice soliciting bids on the Premises. Seller shall pay the costs of recording the conveyance instrument. 11. DEFAULTS AND TERMINATION. If Purchaser defaults hereunder and such default has not been cured within ten (10) days after written notice of such default to Purchaser, then provided Seller is not in default, Seller's sole remedy shall be to terminate this Agreement by giving Written Notice thereof to Purchaser, whereupon the Earnest Money paid to date shall be retained by Seller as liquidated damages which shall be Seller's sole and exclusive remedy, and neither party shall have any further liability or obligation to the other. The parties acknowledge and agree that Seller's actual damages in the event of Purchaser's default are uncertain in amount and difficult to ascertain and that said amount of liquidated damages was reasonably determined by mutual agreement between the parties and said sum was not intended to be a penalty in nature. If Seller defaults hereunder and such default has not been cured within thirty (30) days after Written Notice of such default to Seller, and provided Purchaser is not in default, Purchaser may, at its option: (a) terminate this Agreement, whereupon the Earnest Money shall be returned to Purchaser and neither party shall have any further liability or obligation to the other, 4 (b) enforce this Agreement by a suit for specific performance, or (c) pursue any other remedy available by law or in equity. 12. EXPENSES. Any and all costs and expenses incurred by Seller in connection with this transaction, including, without limitation, associated costs of the land swap including zoning and use approvals recording fees, conveyance fees, public notice cost, documentary and intangible taxes of every nature and kind whatsoever, shall be borne and paid by Purchaser. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Seller shall be responsible for Seller's legal fees and expenses. 13. INTERMEDIARIES. Any and all brokerage commissions or fees brought about by the action of Purchaser shall be the sole responsibility of the Purchaser. Purchaser shall indemnify Seller and hold Seller harmless from and against any claim or liability for commission or fees to any broker or any other person or party claiming to have been engaged by Purchaser as a real estate broker, salesman or representative, in connection with this Agreement, including costs and reasonable attorneys' fees incident thereto. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Seller represents and warrants that no brokers or realtors have been engaged by Seller with respect to the purchase and/or sale of the County Property or the Estates Shopping Property. This provision shall survive closing of this transaction. 14 CLOSING. Closing shall take place during normal business hours at the offices of the Escrow Agent, 4001 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 300, Naples, Florida, 34103, or such other location as parties may select, within 30 days from the date Purchaser obtains the last of all necessary County, State and Federal approvals. 15. GENERAL PROVISIONS. A. This Agreement, including all exhibits attached hereto and documents to be delivered pursuant hereto, shall constitute the entire agreement and understanding of the parties, and there are no other prior or contemporaneous written or oral agreements, undertakings, promises, warranties or covenants not contained herein. B. This Agreement may be amended only by a written memorandum subsequently executed by all the parties hereto. C. No waiver of any provision or condition of this Agreement by any party shall be valid unless in writing signed by such party. No such waiver shall be taken as a waiver of any other or similar provision or of any future event act or default. D. Time is of the essence of this Agreement. In the computation of any period provided for in this Agreement or by law, any date falling on a Saturday, Sunday or legal holiday shall be deemed to refer to the next day which is not a Saturday, Sunday or legal holiday. E. In the event that any provision of this Agreement shall be unenforceable in whole or in part, such provision shall be limited to the extent necessary to render the same valid, or shall be excised from this Agreement, as circumstances require, and this Agreement shall be construed as if said provision had been incorporated herein as so limited, or as if said provision had not been included herein, as the case may be. F. Headings of paragraphs are for convenience of reference only and shall not be construed as a part of this Agreement. G. This Agreement shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the parties hereto, and their respective heirs, executors, personal representatives, successors and assigns, provided, however, that this Agreement may not be assigned by Purchaser without the prior express written consent of Seller, which consent may be withheld for any reason whatsoever. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Purchase may elect to take title to the County Property in the name of a trust and/or entity related to Purchase or Robert Crown H. Any and all notices permitted, or required to be given hereunder, shall be in writing and shall be either personally delivered to the party or shall be sent by United States mail, postage prepaid, registered or certified mail to the following addresses. Any such notice shall be deemed given and effective upon receipt or refusal of delivery thereof by the primary party to whom it is to be sent. AS TO SELLER: Collier County Real Property Management Attention: Toni A. Mott 3335 East Tamiami Trail, Naples, Florida 34112 WITH A COPY TO: Collier County Attorney's Office Attention: Jeffrey A. Klatzkow, County Attorney W. Harmon Turner Building, 811 Floor 3335 East Tamiami Trail, Naples, Florida 34112 AS TO PURCHASER: Crown Management Services, LLC Attention: Robert Crown 207 Cherry Hill Drive Presto, PA 15142 WITH A COPY TO: Richard D. Yovanovich, Esq. Coleman, Yovanovich & Koester, P.A. 4001 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 300 Naples, FL 34103 I. This Agreement shall be governed in all respects by the laws of the State of Florida. If any legal action or other proceeding is brought for the enforcement of this Agreement, or because of an alleged dispute, breach or default in connection with any of the provisions of the Agreement, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover reasonable paralegal and attorneys' fees and all out of pocket third party costs incurred in that action or proceeding, including those related to appeals. J. This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, any or all of which may contain the signatures of less than all the parties, and all of which shall be construed together as but a single instrument. K. Possession of the County Property shall be delivered to the Purchaser at Closing. Possession of the Estates Shopping Property shall be delivered to the Seller at Closing L. The word "Closing", or words of similar import as used in this Agreement, shall be construed to mean the originally fixed time and closing date specified herein or any adjourned time and date provided for herein or agreed to in writing by the parties, or any earlier date permitted herein. no M. This Agreement is between Seller and Purchaser and no other party shall, under any circumstances, be deemed to be a beneficiary of any of the terms and conditions to be performed by Seiler pursuant to this Agreement. N. All the parties to this Agreement have participated fully in the negotiation and preparation hereof; and, accordingly, this Agreement shall not be more strictly construed against any one of the parties hereto. O. Neither this Agreement nor any memorandum or evidence hereof shall be recorded in any public records by Purchaser. If so recorded by Purchaser, this Agreement shall be deemed ipso facto canceled and terminated: the Earnest Money shall thereupon be retained by or paid to Seller as liquidated damages for such default, and Purchaser shall have no further interest in the County Property, pursuant to this Agreement or otherwise. P. Any prior agreements, representations, understandings or oral statements, including, but not limited to rendering or representations contained in sales brochures, maps, sketches, advertising or sales materials, and oral statements of sales representatives, if not expressed in this Agreement, are void, have no effect, and have not been relied upon by Purchaser. 16. ESCROW AGENT. Escrow Agent shall not be responsible for any defaults hereunder by any party. In the event of an actual or potential dispute as to the rights of the parties hereto under this Agreement, the Escrow Agent may in its sole discretion, continue to hold the Earnest Money until the parties mutually agree to the release thereof, or until a judgment of a court of competent jurisdiction shall determine the rights of the parties thereto, or it may deposit any monies and all instruments held pursuant to this Agreement with the Clerk of Court, Collier County, Florida, and upon notifying all parties concerned of such action, all liability on the part of the Escrow Agent shall fully terminate, except to the extent of an account of any monies theretofore delivered out of escrow. All parties agree that Escrow Agent shall not be liable to any party or person whomsoever for any action taken or omitted by Escrow Agent, including but not limited to any mis-delivery of monies or instruments subject to this escrow, unless such mis- delivery shall be due to willful breach in bad faith of this Agreement or gross negligence on the part of the Escrow Agent. All of the terms and conditions in connection with Escrow Agent's duties and responsibilities and the rights of Seller, Purchaser and any lender or anyone else, are contained in this instrument, and the Escrow Agent is not required to be familiar with the provisions of any other instrument or agreement, and shall not be charged with any responsibility or liability in connection with the observance or non -observance by anyone of the provisions of any other such instrument or agreement. Escrow Agent may rely and shall be protected in acting upon any paper or other document which may be submitted to Escrow Agent in connection with its duties hereunder and which is believed by Escrow Agent to be genuine and to have been signed or presented by the property party or parties and shall have no liability or responsibility with respect to the form, execution or validity thereof. Escrow Agent shall not be required to institute or defend any action or legal process involving any matter referred to herein which in any manner affects it or Escrow Agent's duties or liabilities hereunder unless or until required to do so by the Purchaser or Seller, and then only upon receiving full indemnity in an amount and of such character as Escrow Agent shall require, against any and all claims, liabilities, judgments, attorneys' fees and other expenses of every kind in relation thereto, except in the case of Escrow Agent's own willful misconduct or gross negligence. Escrow Agent shall not be bound in any way or affected by any notice of any modification, cancellation, abrogation or rescission of this Agreement, or any fact or circumstance affecting or alleged to affect the 7 rights or liabilities of any other persons, unless Escrow Agent has received written notice satisfactory to Escrow Agent signed by all parties to this Agreement. 17. OTHER PROVISIONS: A. Seller and Purchaser have the right to maintain possession of their respective properties until the date of closing. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement to be executed as of the day and year first above written. AS TO SELLER: DATED: a `1 ATTEST: CRY5TALrK. KINZEL, Qjerk 1 1 7 Attest as to ChaiftV eputy Clerl¢ signature only. and legality: Jeffrey County 0 BOARD OF TY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIEF TY, FLOMA r L14 C J By: W' iam L. McDaniel, Jr., Chair an AS TO PURCHASER (as to all): DATED: z /ei WitnessVoignatVie) Prjnt Na Witness (Sig ature Print Name: ri1 .( Vol Richard D. Yovanovich, as Successor Trustee under Land Trust Agreement Dated June 10, 2009 known as Trust Number 850.045 Richard D. Yovanovich, as Successor Trustee of Land Trust 850.028 under Land Trust Agreement dated December 1, 2005 Richard D. Yovanovich, as Successor Trustee of the Golden Gate Boulevard West Trust Richard D. Yovanovich, as Successor Trustee of Land Trust 850,024 under Land Trust Agreement dated December 1, 2005 Richard D. Yovanovich, as Successor Trustee of Land Trust 850.031 under Land Trust Agreement dated December 1, 2005 Exhibit "A" County Property All of Tract "A", Golden Gate Estates, Unit 22, according, to the plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 7, Pages 83 and 84 of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida, LESS AND EXCEPT that portion conveyed by Statutory Deed and recorded in O.R. Book 4079, Page 1358. Exhibit "B" Estates Shopping Property 12 TRACT 76 I 1 I TRACT 105 I I TRACT 112 i 1 i TRACT 141 I 1 I 1 (OR 2640, PG 1157) (OR 4098. PG 3964 ) 1 I I S 89'40'50" E (OR 5315. PG 2493) 480.00' I e _ (OR 5197, PG 3325) I 1 1 1 I I 8 (OR 5197. PG 3327) I (OR 5197. PG 3351) I I I I I 'I I I I I I I I I M I I m I 1 I I I I i I I I I I I 1,1 I rd)I I TRACT 101 TRACT 108 TRACT 109 --- 110 TRACT � i � I I tit 1 y I 1 a a n a I TRACT 113 m rn a a m a I I I 1 w I I m I pl I 4i I I I I 333 I 60' ROADWAY 1 ROADWAY ------ -j L---�--- POB I I60' ------- ----g ______________ __ S a9.4o50' IF84000' N 89'40'50" W GOLDEN GATE BLVD W 480 00' -POC i TRACT 87LL� --- TRACT ---� -------- - TRACT 88 89 TRACT 22 TRACT 123 i 1 TRACT 124 GOLDEN GATE ESTATES UNIT NO. 12 (PB 4, PG 105) DRAWN BY: KJG Associates, P.A. GradyMinor Q. Grady Vlloor an 3800 Via Del Rey Bonita Springs, Florida 34134 Civil Engineers Land Surveyors Planners Landscape Architects Cert. or Mah. EB 0005151 Cert of Aulh. LB 0005151 Business LC 26000266 Bonita Springs: 239.947.1144 www.Grad.N/nor.com FortMvers: 239.690.4380 CHECKED CODE:: ElUIOLS = 200' ALE' 1" a SC2DO' SC DATE: 6AUGUST 2019 FILE: 19.21SLA SHEET: 1 o1 I PROPERTY DESCRIPTION A PARCEL OF LAND BEING ALL OF TRACT 110 AND A PORTION OF TRACTS 109 AND 111, GOLDEN GATE ESTATES UNIT NO. 11, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 4, PAGES 103 AND 104, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER CDUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCE AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF TRACT 107, GOLDEN GATE ESTATES UNIT NO. 11, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 4, PAGES 103 AND 104, OF THE PUBLIC RLCORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA, THENCE ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID PLAT SOUTH 89'40'50" EAST, 840.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE PARCEL OF LAND HEREIN DESCRIBED: THENCE NORTH 0019'10' EAST, A DISTANCE OF 935.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89'40'50' EAST, A DISTANCE OF 480.00 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF TRACT 111, OF SAID PLAT; THENCE ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID TRACT 111 AND TRACT 110, SOUTH 00'19'10' WEST, A DISTANCE OF 935.00 FEET TO A POINT ON THE AFOREMENTIONED SOUTH LINE OF SAID PLAT; THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE, NORTH 89'40'50" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 480,00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 10.30 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. NOTES: 1. BEARINGS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON THE SOUTH LINE OF GOLDEN GATE ESTATES UNIT NO. 11, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK a, PAGES 103 AND 104, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AS BEING N 89'40'50' W. 2. DIMENSIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE IN U.S. SURVEY FEET AND DECIMALS THEREOF. J. THIS SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION IS F1QT VALID WITHOUT THE ORIGINAL SIGNATURE AND SEAL OF A LICENSED FLORIDA SURVEYOR AND MAPPER. NO ADDITIONS OR DELETIONS TO THIS SKETCH h DESCRIPTION MAP ARE PERMITTED WITHOUT THE EXPRESSED WRITTEN CONSENT OF THE SIGNING PARTY. LEGEND: POO POINT OF COMMENCEMENT POB POINT OF BEGINNING OR OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK PB PUT BOOK PG PAGE(S) o 100' 200' 400-N- SCALE: - SCALE: 1 " = 200' THIS PLAN MAY HAVE BEEN ENLARGED OR REDUCED FROM INTENDED DISPLAY SCALE FOR REPRODUCTION REASONS SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION ESTATES SHOPPING CENTER COLLIER COUNTY PARCEL LYING IN SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 27 EAST COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA o, -w rn, R Ft LICENSE 76l !oR 7FIE /RY D PROJECT: RANDALL CURVE PROPERTY FOLIO NO.: 37690040003 FIRST AMENDMENT TO REAL ESTATE SALES AGREEMENT This First Amendment to Real Estate Sales Agreement (this "Amendment") is made and entered into effective as of December M, 2019, by and between the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA ("Seller"), and RICHARD D. YOVANOVICH, SUCCESSOR TRUSTEE (AND NOT INDIVIDUALLY) ("Purchaser"). RECITALS: A. Seller and Purchaser have entered into that certain Real Estate Sales Agreement dated September 24, 2019 (the "Agreement"), relating to the purchase and sale of a 47 +/- acre parcel commonly known as the Randall Curve Property and legally described on Exhibit "A" attached to the Agreement. B. Seller and Purchaser hereby amend the Agreement as more particularly provided for herein. C. Capitalized terms used but not defined in this Amendment shall have the same meaning ascribed to such capitalized terms in the Agreement. AGREEMENT: NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein and for other valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, Seller and Purchaser hereby agree the Agreement is amended as follows: 1. Due Diligence Period. Purchaser's Due Diligence Period (as defined in Section 7 of the Agreement) is hereby extended to January 31, 2020. 2. Second Deposit. Purchaser's Second Deposit shall be due prior to the end of the Due Diligence Period as extended hereby. 3. Ratification and Confirmation. Except as provided herein, all terms and provisions of the Agreement and the rights of the parties thereunder shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect. The Agreement as modified and amended hereby is hereby ratified and confirmed in all respects. In the event of a conflict between the terms of the Agreement and the terms hereof, the rights and obligations of the parties hereto shall be governed by the terms of this Amendment. 4. Counterparts; Facsimile; Email. This Amendment may be executed in any number of counterparts with the same effect as if all parties hereto had signed the same document. All such counterparts shall be construed together and shall constitute one instrument, but in seeking proof hereof, it shall only be necessary to produce one such counterpart. For purposes of this Amendment, any signature transmitted by facsimile or e-mail (in pdf. or comparable format) has the same legal and binding effect as any original signature. 0 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment is executed by Seller and Purchaser to be effective as of the date first above written. DATED: , 2019 ATTEST: CRYSTAL :a K�1�La Clerk A- De *' t' lerk l��St a& t0 ��ll'IYt s ignat�tfrg'only. `°�- ��4''8!! Approved as� `Co ,form and legality: Je r B. Belp o (}� Asst. County Attorn � SELLER: BOARD OF C COMMISSIONERS OF COLC Y, FL DA By: c W f iam. L. McDaniel, Jr., Chairman 2 0 AS TO PURCHASER (as to all): DATED: ICI Witness (Signature) Print Name: i Zd.n na(�)L,Aintan i I Lei L lq ,/j/66&�-6eeq�— Richard D. Yovanovich, as Successor Trustee under Land Trust Agreement Dated June 10, 2009 known as Trust Number 850.045 Richard D. Yovanovich, as Successor Trustee of Land Trust 850.028 under Land Trust Agreement dated December 1, 2005 Richard D. Yovanovich, as Successor Trustee of the Golden Gate Boulevard West Trust Richard D. Yovanovich, as Successor Trustee of Land Trust 850.024 under Land Trust Agreement dated December 1, 2005 Richard D. Yovanovich, as Successor Trustee of Land Trust 850.031 under Land Trust Agreement dated December 1, 2005 0 PROJECT: RANDALL CURVE PROPERTY FOLIO NO.: 37690040003 SECOND AMENDMENT TO REAL ESTATE SALES AGREEMENT This Second Amendment to Real Estate Sales Agreement (this "Amendment") is made and entered into effective as of January Qg*,1020, by and between the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA ("Seller"}, and RICHARD D. YOVANOVICH, SUCCESSOR TRUSTEE (AND NOT INDIVIDUALLY) ("Purchaser"). RECITALS: A. Seller and Purchaser have entered into that certain Real Estate Sales Agreement dated September 24, 2019, as first amended on December 10, 2019 (the "Agreement"), relating to the purchase and sale of a 47 +l- acre parcel commonly known as the Randall Curve Property and legally described on Exhibit "A" attached to the Agreement. B. Seller and Purchaser hereby further amend the Agreement as more particularly provided for herein. C. Capitalized terms used but not defined in this Amendment shall have the same meaning ascribed to such capitalized terms in the Agreement. AGREEMENT: NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein and for other valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, Seller and Purchaser hereby agree the Agreement is amended as follows: I. Due Diligence Period. Purchaser's Due Diligence Period (as defined in Section 7 of the Agreement) is hereby extended to March 31, 2020. 2. Second Deposit. Purchaser's Second Deposit shall be due prior to the end of the Due Diligence Period as extended hereby. 3. Ratification and Confirmation. Except as provided herein, all terms and provisions of the Agreement and the rights of the parties thereunder shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect. The Agreement as modified and amended hereby is hereby ratified and confirmed in all respects. In the event of a conflict between the terms of the Agreement and the terms hereof, the rights and obligations of the parties hereto shall be governed by the terms of this Amendment. 4. Counterparts; Facsimile; Email. This Amendment may be executed in any number of counterparts with the same effect as if all parties hereto had signed the same document. All such counterparts shall be construed together and shall constitute one instrument, but in seeking proof hereof, it shall only be necessary to produce one such counterpart. For purposes of this Amendment, any signature transmitted by facsimile or e-mail (in pdf or comparable format) has the same legal and binding effect as any original signature. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment is executed by Seller and Purchaser to be effective as of the date first above written. h DATED: January 2 f?, 2020 ATTEST; . CRYSTAL K.. KIN?EL, Clerk Attest'as tv Chaftaril le siQnett�reott[}��q. .���� Approved as to form and legality: '� � a R ) �2 Jenni er B. Be1ped1 Asst. County Attorney SELLER: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIE OUNTY, FL IDA By: Burt L. Saunders, Chairman ocpl�i AS TO PURCHASER (as to all): DATED: January , 2020 ame: Print Name: Richard D. Yovanovich, as Successor Trustee under Land Trust Agreement Dated June 10, 2009 known as Trust Number 850.045 1 I� Richard D. Yovanovich, as Successor Trustee of Land Trust 850.028 under Land Trust Agreement dated December 1, 2005 Richard D. Yovanovich, as Successor Trustee of the Golden Gate Boulevard West Trust Richard D. Yovanovich, as Successor Trustee of Land Trust 850.024 under Land Trust Agreement dated December 1, 2005 Richard D. Yovanovich. as Successor Trustee of Land Trust 850.031 under Land Trust Agreement dated December 1, 2005 3 PROJECT: RANDALL CURVE PROPERTY FOLIO NO.: 37690040003 THIRD AMENDMENT TO REAL ESTATE SALES AGREEMENT This Third Amendment to Real Estate Sales Agreement (this "Amendment") is made and entered into effective as of March 24, 2020, by and between the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA ("Seller"), and RICHARD D. YOVANOVICH, SUCCESSOR TRUSTEE (AND NOT INDIVIDUALLY) ("Purchaser"). RECITALS: A. Seller and Purchaser have entered into that certain Real Estate Sales Agreement dated September 24, 2019, as first amended on December 10, 2019 and as further amended on January 28, 2020 (the "Agreement"), relating to the purchase and sale of a 47 -+-/- acre parcel commonly known as the Randall Curve Property and legally described on Exhibit "A" attached to the Agreement. B. Seller and Purchaser hereby further amend the Agreement as more particularly provided for herein- C. Capitalized terms used but not defined in this Amendment shall have the same meaning ascribed to such capitalized terms in the Agreement. AGREEMENT: NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein and for other valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, Seller and Purchaser hereby agree the Agreement is amended as follows: I , Due Diligence Period. Purchaser's Due Diligence Period (as defined in Section 7 of the Agreement) is hereby extended to May 29, 2020. 2. Second Deposit. Purchaser's Second Deposit shall be due prior to the end of the Due Diligence Period as extended hereby. 3. Ratification and Confirmation. Except as provided herein, all terms and provisions of the Agreement and the rights of the parties thereunder shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect. The Agreement as modified and amended hereby is hereby ratified and confirmed in all respects. In the event of a conflict between the terms of the Agreement and the terms hereof, the rights and obligations of the parties hereto shall be governed by the terms of this Amendment. 4. Counterparts, Facsimile; Email. This Amendment may be executed in any number of counterparts with the same effect as if all parties hereto had signed the same document. All such counterparts shall be construed together and shall constitute one instrument, but in seeking proof hereof. it shall only be necessary to produce one such counterpart. For purposes of this Amendment, any signature 1�" .31,glao signature transmitted by facsimile or e-mail (in pdf or comparable format) has the same legal and binding effect as any original signature. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment is executed by Seller and Purchaser to be effective as of the date first above written. DATED: Marche, 2020 ATTMST,, CI,X'l�tL, Clerk Approved as 66 irth and legality: 0 Jenni er B. Belpe Asst. County Atto 01 2 SELLER: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER OUNTY, FLO IDA By: .94 4% Burt L. Saunders, Chairman AS TO PURCHASER (as to all): DATED: March q+", 2020 `�,L, ' , 7Z;�� L1-Qr1n ice., -/t fl1 a 2 Witness (Signature) Print N i I is Witness (Signature Print Name: h t� Richard D. Yovanovich, as Successor Trustee under Land Trust Agreement Dated June 10, 2009 known as Trust Number 850.045 Richard D. Yovanovich, as Successor Trustee of Land Trust 850,028 under Land Trust Agreement dated December 1, 2005 Richard D. Yovanovich, as Successor Trustee of the Golden Gate Boulevard West Trust Richard D. Yovanovich, as Successor Trustee of Land Trust 850.024 under Land Trust Agreement dated December 1, 2005 Richard D. Yovanovich, as Successor Trustee of Land Trust 850.031 under Land Trust Agreement dated December 1, 2005 PROJECT: RANDALL CURVE PROPERTY FOLIO NO.: 37690040003 FOURTH AMENDMENT TO REAL ESTATE SALES AGREEMENT This Fourth Amendment to Real Estate Sales Agreement (this "Amendment") is made and entered into effective as of May 26, 2020, by and between the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA ("Seller"), and RICHARD D. YOVANOVICH, SUCCESSOR TRUSTEE (AND NOT INDIVIDUALLY) ("Purchaser"). RECITALS: A. Seller and Purchaser have entered into that certain Real Estate Sales Agreement dated September 24, 2019, as first amended on December 10, 2019, as second amended on January 28, 2020 and as further amended on March 24, 2020 (the "Agreement"), relating to the purchase and sale of a 47 +/- acre parcel commonly known as the Randall Curve Property and legally described on Exhibit "A" attached to the Agreement. B. Seller and Purchaser hereby further amend the Agreement as more particularly provided for herein. C. Capitalized terms used but not defined in this Amendment shall have the same meaning ascribed to such capitalized terms in the Agreement. AGREEMENT: NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein and for other valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, Seller and Purchaser hereby agree the Agreement is amended as follows: 1. Due Diligence Period. Purchaser's Due Diligence Period (as defined in Section 7 of the Agreement) is hereby extended to June 30, 2020. 2. Second Deposit. Purchaser's Second Deposit shall be due prior to the end of the Due Diligence Period as extended hereby. 3. Ratification and Confirmation. Except as provided herein, all terms and provisions of the Agreement and the rights of the parties thereunder shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect. The Agreement as modified and amended hereby is hereby ratified and confirmed in all respects. In the event of a conflict between the terms of the Agreement and the terms hereof, the rights and obligations of the parties hereto shall be governed by the terms of this Amendment. 4. Counterparts; Facsimile; Email. This Amendment may be executed in any number of counterparts with the same effect as if all parties hereto had signed the same document. All such counterparts shall be construed together and shall constitute one instrument, but in seeking proof hereof, it shall only be necessary to produce one such counterpart. For purposes of this Amendment, any a signature transmitted by facsimile or e-mail (in pdf or comparable format) has the same legal and binding effect as any original signature. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment is executed by Seller and Purchaser to be effective as of the date first above written. DATED: May 4, 2020 AT1ES I-' CRx��.IkEL, Clerk erk signaw#ure+I0• Approved as to form and legality: . '��C_x 10 - D 3enni er B. Belpedi Q-, 1�op' Asst. County Attorn SELLER: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIE OUNTY, FL IDA i By: Burt L. Saunders, Chairman 2 ov AS TO PURCHASER (as to all): DATED: May � 2020 Wit ss ( ignature) Pri t N 'Ll I iGL. Witness (SignsUt e) ' Print Name: V Richard D. Yovanovich, as Successor Trustee under Land Trust Agreement Dated June 10, 2009 known as Trust Number 850.045 41-,^ '-'"1 '-� -<�� Richard D, Yovanovich, as Successor Trustee of Land Trust 850.028 under Land Trust Agreement dated December 1, 2005 Richard D. Yovanovich, as Successor Trustee of the Golden Gate Boulevard West Trust Richard D. Yovanovich, as Successor Trustee of Land Trust 850.024 under Land Trust Agreement dated December 1, 2005 Richard D. Yovanovich, as Successor Trustee of Land Trust 850.031 under Land Trust Agreement dated December 1, 2005 PROJECT: RANDALL CURVE PROPERTY FOLIO NO.: 37690040003 FIFTH AMENDMENT TO REAL ESTATE SALES AGREEMENT This Fifth Amendment to Real Estate Sales Agreement (this "Amendment") is made and entered into effective as of June 23, 2020, by and between the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA ("Seller"), and RICHARD D. YOVANOVICH, SUCCESSOR TRUSTEE (AND NOT INDIVIDUALLY) ("Purchaser"). RECITALS: A. Seller and Purchaser have entered into that certain Real Estate Sales Agreement dated September 24, 2019, as first amended on December 10, 2019, as second amended on January 28, 2020 and third amended on March 24, 2020 and as further amended on May 26, 2020 (collectively, the "Agreement"), relating to the purchase and sale of a 47 +l- acre parcel commonly known as the Randall Curve Property and legally described on Exhibit "A"' attached to the Agreement. B. Seller and Purchaser hereby further amend the Agreement as more particularly provided for herein. C. Capitalized terns used but not defined in this Amendment shall have the same meaning ascribed to such capitalized terms in the Agreement. AGREEMENT: NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein and for other valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, Seller and Purchaser hereby agree the Agreement is amended as follows: 1. Due Diligence Period. Purchaser's Due Diligence Period (as defined in Section 7 of the Agreement) is hereby extended to September 30, 2020. 2. Second Deposit. Purchaser's Second Deposit shall be due prior to the end of the Due Diligence Period as extended hereby. 3. Ratification and Confirmation. Except as provided herein, all terms and provisions of the Agreement and the rights of the parties thereunder shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect. The Agreement as modified and amended hereby is hereby ratified and confirmed in all respects. In the event of a conflict between the terms of the Agreement and the terms hereof, the rights and obligations of the parties hereto shall be governed by the terms of this Amendment. 4. Counterparts, Facsimile Email. This Amendment may be executed in any number of counterparts with the same effect as if all parties hereto had signed the same document. All such counterparts shall be construed together and shall constitute one instrument, but in seeking proof hereof, it shall only be necessary to produce one such counterpart. For purposes of this Amendment, any signature transmitted by facsimile or e-mail (in pdf. or comparable format) has the same legal and binding effect as any original signature. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment is executed by Seller and Purchaser to be effective as of the date first above written. DATED: June 23. 2020 ATTEST: CRYSTAL K,. KNZU, Clerk ?estutorw - Approved as to form and legality: Je er B. Belp ' , Asst. County Attorney SELLER: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLI OUNTY, FL IDA By; 1 Burt L. Saunders, Chairman A5 TO PURCHASER (as to all): DATED: June 4 2020 Witnes (Signature) Print Name: -1 p, -" e}1 rh f, L I�r Witness (Signat ) Print Name: PE?, i3trt`tj�+(7 Richard D. Yovanovich, as lessor Trustee under Land Trust Agreement Dated June 10, 2009 known as Trust Number 850.045 Richard D. Yovanovich, as Successor Trustee of Land Trust 850.028 under Land 'Trust Agreement dated December 1, 2005 Richard D. Yovanovich, as Successor Trustee of the Golden Gate Boulevard West Trust Richard D. Yovanovich, as Successor Trustee of Land Trust 850.024 under Land Trust Agreement dated December 1, 2005 J Richard D. Yovailovich, as Successor Trustee of Land Trust 850.031 under Land Trust Agreement dated December 1, 2005 PROJECT: RANDALL CURVE PROPERTY FOLIO NO.: 37690040003 SIXTH AMENDMENT TO REAL ESTATE SALES AGREEMENT This Sixth Amendment to Real Estate Sales Agreement (this "Amendment") is made and entered into effective as of July 14, 2020, by and between the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA ("Seller"), and RICHARD D. YOVANOVICH, SUCCESSOR TRUSTEE (AND NOT INDIVIDUALLY) ("Purchaser"). RECITALS: A. Seller and Purchaser have entered into that certain Real Estate Sales Agreement dated September 24, 2019, as first amended on December 10, 2019, as second amended on January 28, 2020 and third amended on March 24, 2020 and fourth amended on May 26, 2020 and as further amended on June 23, 2020 (collectively, the "Agreement"), relating to the purchase and sale of a 47 +/- acre parcel commonly known as the Randall Curve Property and legally described on Exhibit "A" attached to the Agreement. B. Seller and Purchaser hereby further amend the Agreement as more particularly provided for herein. C. Capitalized terms used but not defined in this Amendment shall have the same meaning ascribed to such capitalized terms in the Agreement. AGREEMENT: NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein and for other valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, Seller and Purchaser hereby agree the Agreement is amended as follows: 1. County Property. The parties agree to increase the size of the County Property to 50.18 acres, more or less. Exhibit "A" attached to the Agreement is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with a new Exhibit "A" attached to this Amendment. 2. Purchase Price. The Purchase Price is changed to $3,828,000.00. 3. Closing Contingencies. As conditions of Closing, on or before the Closing Date, Seller shall ("Closing Contingencies"): a. Execute a release of the use restrictions and right of reverter (in recordable form acceptable to Purchaser) contained in deeds recorded in O.R. Book 3930, Page 356 and O.R. Book 4079, Page 1356, both in the Public Records of Collier County, Florida; b. Provide the necessary affidavits, lien waivers and estoppel letters to allow the title/closing agent to delete Schedule B-II exceptions 1, 2, 4, 5 and 6 as shown in Purchaser's title commitment prepared by First American Title Insurance Company Revision Number 4 dated January 13, 2020 ("Title Commitment"); and 9 c. Provide the deeds and affidavits required in the forms described in Schedule B-I items #4(a) and 4(b) as shown in the Title Commitment. If Seller is unable to satisfy all of the Closing Contingencies by the Closing Date, Buyer may either: (a) waive the Closing Contingencies, in writing, and proceed to Closing, or (b) terminate the Agreement by providing written notice to Seller on or before the Closing Date, in which event all deposits shall be returned to Buyer without further action of the parties and the parties shall have no further rights or obligations under the Agreement. 4. Storm Water Management. If, after Closing, Purchaser elects to modify Pond #9, the following terms and conditions shall be applicable: Pond # 9 located at the intersection of Immokalee Road and Randall Boulevard provides treatment and attenuation for a segment of Immokalee Road. Based on the approved permit, the pond currently provides 1.10 acre feet of water quality and 5.42 acre feet of total treatment/attenuation. The discharge pipe for Pond # 9 discharges to the west to the Corkscrew Canal by means of a 42' RCP Pipe. The Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) is in the process of completing the project development and environment (PD&E) study for the Immokalee Road/Randall Boulevard intersection improvements. Long term plans anticipate a flyover at this intersection. Based on the future improvements, additional water quality and storage requirements would be necessary for Pond # 9. Assuming the proposed pond site on Randall Boulevard as shown in the FDOT PD&E study are still acceptable, the County will require that the water quality of Pond # 9 be increased to 2.0 acre feet (net increase of 0.90 acre feet) and the treatment attenuation be increased to 6.0 Acre Feet (net increase of 0.58 acre feet) for future use by the County for the Randall Boulevard projects. With the acquisition of Parcel 2, as described in Exhibit A attached hereto ("Parcel 2"), Purchaser shall: A. Grant the County a drainage easement and lake maintenance easement, free and clear of all liens and encumbrances and without responsibility for Parcel 2. Purchaser shall provide at no cost to the County an attorney's opinion of title, and Purchaser shall be responsible at all costs for promptly removing or curing any liens, encumbrances or deficiencies revealed in any title work, except those existing as of the time Purchaser acquires Parcel 2 from the County. Purchaser will provide the County Attorney's Office with an executed easement (including sketches and legal descriptions signed and sealed by a Florida Licensed Surveyor), suitable for recording. Upon receipt, the County shall record the easement in the Public Records of the County. Purchaser shall pay all costs associated with the recordation of the easement. This easement must allow the County the ability to modify the entire area of Parcel 2 (conversion to a wet pond) to accommodate future stormwater needs for the transportation network. Should the Purchaser modify the drainage and lake maintenance easement as identified in Paragraph F below to increase the water quality and attenuation, the drainage and lake maintenance easement will be amended to encompass the newly configured pond site, access berm and access from the public road to said pond area. The parties agree to execute an amendment to the easement, which shall be recorded in the Public Records of the County. B. The Purchaser shall be obligated to maintain the stormwater management system, which includes stormwater ponds, control structures, drainage structures, and pipe conveyance system in perpetuity at its sole cost and expense. Should the Purchaser fail to maintain the Stormwater 2 Management System, the County may provide notice to the Purchaser in writing, specifying the nature of the deficiency. Within five working days following receipt of such notice, the Purchaser at its sole cost shall cause the appropriate repairs or cure to be effected. In the event damage to, or failure to maintain the Stormwater Management System results in a situation where public safety is at risk, (1) Purchaser shall effect repairs within twenty-four hours of receipt of the County's written notice, or (2) County may, at its option, effect repairs to the improvements, without the need for prior notice to the Purchaser, and will promptly bill the Purchaser for all actual costs incurred in effecting the repairs. Purchaser shall reimburse the County for such costs within thirty days of receipt of the County's bill. County shall be granted access to the stormwater system connected to the roadway at all times. C. Five years after the acquisition and every five years thereafter, Purchaser shall perform an inspection by a certified engineer to assess the condition of the stormwater system. The inspection report shall be forwarded to the County for monitoring. Purchaser and its successors in interest, including any homeowner associations, will be solely responsible for the perpetual operation and maintenance of the shared stormwater management system. Notwithstanding the sole maintenance responsibility, the parties acknowledge that due to the importance of the drainage from roadway projects, the drainage easement will include a maintenance easement to allow Collier County to do whatever it deems necessary to repair or maintain the drainage system. If, after reasonable written notice to the Purchaser of a repair or maintenance issue concerting the shared stormwater management system goes unheeded, the County may enter the development for the purpose of repairing or maintaining the system, and the Purchaser will pay the County its full cost incurred in conducting such repair and maintenance. D. Purchaser, on behalf of itself, it successors and assigns (including any and all future owners and tenants, both commercial or residential, within the development), hereby (1) waives any and all claims for compensation and damages, including but not limited to future business damages and loss of access, from Collier County as a result of the flyover or its construction; and (2) will give all successors, assigns, tenants and buyers, both residential and commercial, who purchase or lease land from the Purchaser a separate written notice of the planned flyover with the statement that the County will not construct any sound wall or other barrier of any kind to reduce the impact, noise, etc. of the flyover. E. Acquisition of Parcel 2 does not guarantee nor prohibit the development access to 4th Street NE. Should the Purchaser modify Parcel 2, they shall be required to adhere to all of the aforementioned items as well as those noted below: F. Increase the water quality to 2.0 acre feet, a net increase of 0.90 acre feet from the current permitted allowance and the treatment attenuation to 6.0 acre feet, a net increase of 0.58 acre feet from the currently permitted Pond # 9. G. County and Purchaser agree that the County's stormwater system and Purchaser's storm water system will not be commingled and the development site will adhere to the discharge rate set forth in Policy 6.3 of the Stormwater Management Sub Element of the Public Facilities Element of the Growth Management Plan. Purchaser may connect to County outfall facilities downstream of control structures and upstream of the Immokalee Road Canal if Purchaser's calculated discharge flows and designed outfall connection do not cause negative impacts or otherwise impede County outfall to the Corkscrew Canal. 3 D40 The terms of this Paragraph 4 shall apply to Purchaser's successors and assigns and survive the Closing Date. 5. Chloramine Booster Station. Within ninety (90) days after the Closing Date, Seller shall, at Seller's cost and expense, remove the chloramine booster station located in the southern corner of the County Property. 6. Ratification and Confirmation. Except as provided herein, all terms and provisions of the Agreement and the rights of the parties thereunder shall remain unchanged and in full force and effect. The Agreement as modified and amended hereby is hereby ratified and confirmed in all respects. In the event of a conflict between the terms of the Agreement and the terms hereof, the rights and obligations of the parties hereto shall be governed by the terms of this Amendment. 7. Counterparts; Facsimile; Email. This Amendment may be executed in any number of counterparts with the same effect as if all parties hereto had signed the same document. All such counterparts shall be construed together and shall constitute one instrument, but in seeking proof hereof, it shall only be necessary to produce one such counterpart. For purposes of this Amendment, any signature transmitted by facsimile or e-mail (in pdf. or comparable format) has the same legal and binding effect as any original signature. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment is executed by Seller and Purchaser to be effective as of the date first above written. DATED: July 14, 2020 ATTESTS CRY�;I'ALKI KINZEJ, Clerk l Approved as to form and legality: Tz 0 Je O er B. Belpedio, a0� Asst. County Attorney SELLER: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COL COU TY,.y4ORlDA By. Burt L. Saunders, Chairman AS TO PURCHASER (as to all): DATED: June 30, 2020 Witness (Signature) Print Name: / Richard D. Yovanovich, as Successor Trustee under Land Trust Agreement Dated June 10, 2009 known as Trust Number 850.045 14-1�� Richard D. Yovanovich, as Successor Trustee of Land Trust 850.028 under Land Trust Agreement dated December 1, 2005 Richard D. Yovanovich, as Successor Trustee of the Golden Gate Boulevard West Trust Richard D. Yovanovich, as Successor Trustee of Land Trust 850.024 under Land Trust Agreement dated December 1, 2005 Hz� Richard D. Yovanovich, as Successor Trustee of Land Trust 850.031 under Land Trust Agreement dated December 1, 2005 Exhibit "A" Page 1 of 2 County Property PARCEL 1 A PORTION OF TRACT "A" GOLDEN GATE ESTATES, UNIT 22, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 7, PAGE 83 AND 84, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGIN AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF TRACT "A" GOLDEN GATE ESTATES, UNIT 22, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 7, PAGES 83 AND 84, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID TRACT "A", NORTH 89°30'02" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 1,366.01 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WESTERLY BOUNDARY OF THE LANDS DESCRIBED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 4079, PAGE 1361, PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, THE SAME BEING A POINT ON A NON TANGENTIAL CURVE TO THE RIGHT; THENCE ALONG SAID BOUNDARY, SOUTHWESTERLY 2,258.82 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE, HAVING A RADIUS OF 2,754.79 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 46°58'49", (CHORD BEARING SOUTH 24°49'44" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 2,196.07 FEET) TO A POINT ON THE BOUNDARY OF THE LANDS DESCRIBED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 4079, PAGE 1358, PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE ALONG SAID BOUNDARY FOR THE FOLLOWING TWO (2) COURSES AND DISTANCES, 1) NORTH 00-29'58" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 361.77 FEET; 2) THENCE NORTH 89°59'48" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 426.54 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WEST BOUNDARY OF THE AFOREMENTIONED TRACT "A"; THENCE ALONG SAID BOUNDARY, NORTH 00°29'58" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 1,619.45 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 45.02 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. PARCEL 2 BEING A PORTION PARCEL 179 AS DESCRIBED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 4079, PAGE 1358 AND LYING WITHIN TRACT "A", GOLDEN GATE ESTATES, UNIT 22, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 7, PAGES 83 AND 84, BOTH OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCE AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF TRACT "A", GOLDEN GATE ESTATES, UNIT 22, ACCORDING TO THE PLATTHEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 7, PAGES 83 AND 84, PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID TRACT "A", SOUTH 00°29'58" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 1,619.45 FEET TO A POINT ON THE BOUNDARY OF PARCEL 179 AS DESCRIBED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 4079, PAGE 1358, OF SAID PUBLIC RECORDS AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE PARCEL OF LAND HEREIN DESCRIBED; THENCE ALONG SAID BOUNDARY FOR THE FOLLOWING TWO (2) COURSES AND DISTANCES, 1) SOUTH 89-59,48" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 426.54 FEET; 2) THENCE SOUTH 00°29'58" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 361.77 FEET TO A POINT ON A NON TANGENTIAL CURVE TO THE RIGHT; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY 526.09 FEET ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE, HAVING A RADIUS OF 2,754.79 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 10-56'31", (CHORD BEARING SOUTH 53°47'24" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 525.29 FEET) TO A POINT ON THE AFOREMENTIONED BOUNDARY OF SAID PARCEL 179, THE SAME BEING THE WEST LINE OF SAID TRACT "A"; THENCE ALONG SAID BOUNDARY AND SAID WEST LINE, NORTH 00'29'58" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 672.12 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 5.16 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. TOTAL CONTAINING 50.18 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. 7 �O Exhibit "A" Page 2 of 2 G >o , -- _ 9CAIE � l� I�•: -- -- ,..r n.. a. a m w _ ,. _-_- ____-_;_______-_ N w a —y/I •� - � _ `� t� mwa wna[nmavauumm[ a.wwaran®awaa ••• / �a / •�1^ra"`�r..r \ , , �,� � � �\ or.� — —jl—.mow maw�mK mom' Jwsi �-' \ • \\ ,meenr owr�mrm�"vsaaa'c �ws.•o GOLDEN GATE ESTATES trot m���ri tU e I 1 I zx. _.s GOIOEN GATE ESTA TES wmm 111 µ R or,mary rr i V G'S �,I C c. � n�z W aw.n •a`ann 1 `\ NOTES amev arwa�r'aaao�uriaw.�®zzm � ammm o � a rV ' - ` , \ m ➢tn Mmw u m(v nn . M. aLn w /m no x M" v w' a rv' armr rz a . rwc r wr n® ono ,w N ,mt oam1. ------"' PARCEL 1 TNAOTA• GOLOENGA STATES \I \ w�amwm = a w aKr s ��� ��\`\ Mmsv.6 anMx nrpaz.4vv Nays rnr aw � R rr 9 nw tyro we s zv.orm a ,w tmn mr N °lu ♦�\ \ \ .wc n,erw m wnn.Am/. /ran f44 na®rt wa 9mtw6 a owm Yrzmt a•'e; °\ `\ a.,nan.n,wm,w ®O6maosnvwawana�nK< `"i ^ "c+l• y�'J" III} ___ i \ �' ��r` °\ rz xa'r,mmovt�rn. PARCA 2 `"1 `\�`, 1°a \+\,-, ; "\ �.i•rw V i I_IIL ` r►r�ir wzml � :�� i :.,,\ N O.2958•W vt Mn amwr. rc— — — — — — I�TMSTNE. rwa w _ __ _� n m____-_-_-_-_-_-_-__ a �} _________ real \ my PrwtarwU p�mwl nla aawsl npywraq Y ua � Iwi wart LEGEND xan o .va imam i o" . tea, a mm a Otl ✓ o®omMMM© I0am®m00 O®®mm ,ID®®®®® o®o®®m ®®�m�m, Om®m��i ooM®®ei Colfler county COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net ADDRESSING CHECKLIST 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 252-5724 Please complete the following and email to GMD—Addressing@colliergov.net or fax to the Operations Division at 239-252-5724 or submit in person to the Addressing Section at the above address. Form must be signed by Addressing personnel prior to pre -application meeting, please allow 3 days for processing. Not all items will apply to every project. Items in bold type are required. FOLIO NUMBERS MUST BE PROVIDED. Forms older than 6 months will require additional review and approval by the Addressing Section. PETITION TYPE (Indicate type below, complete a separate Addressing Checklist for each Petition type) ❑ BL (Blasting Permit) ❑ SDP (Site Development Plan) ❑ BD (Boat Dock Extension) ❑ SDPA (SDP Amendment) ❑ Carnival/Circus Permit ❑ SDPI (Insubstantial Change to SDP) ❑ CU (Conditional Use) ❑ SIP (Site Improvement Plan) ❑ EXP (Excavation Permit) ❑ SIPI (Insubstantial Change to SIP) ❑ FP (Final Plat ❑ SNR (Street Name Change) ❑ LLA (Lot Line Adjustment) ❑ SNC (Street Name Change — Unplatted) ❑ PNC (Project Name Change) ❑ TDR (Transfer of Development Rights) ❑ PPL (Plans & Plat Review) ❑ VA (Variance) ❑ PSP (Preliminary Subdivision Plat) ❑ VRP (Vegetation Removal Permit) ❑ PUD Rezone ❑ VRSFP (Vegetation Removal & Site Fill Permit) ❑ RZ (Standard Rezone) Fo-I OTHER GMPA LEGAL DESCRIPTION of subject property or properties (copy of lengthy description may be attached) S22, T48, R27 See Attached FOLIO (Property ID) NUMBER(s) of above (attach to, or associate with, legal description if more than one) 37690040003 and 37690040100 STREET ADDRESS or ADDRESSES (as applicable, if already assigned) 2470 4th St N.E. LOCATION MAP must be attached showing exact location of project/site in relation to nearest public road right- of-way • SURVEY (copy - needed only for unplatted properties) CURRENT PROJECT NAME (if applicable) N.A. Immokalee Road Commercial Center Subdistrict PROPOSED PROJECT NAME (if applicable) Immokalee Road/4th Street N.E. Mixed Use Subdistrict (Not approved at this time) PROPOSED STREET NAMES (if applicable) SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN NUMBER (for existing projects/sites only) SDP - or AR or PL # PL20190002355 & PL20190002356 GMPA PUDR1 Rev. 6/9/2017 Page 1 of 2 Coflie-r County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 252-5724 Project or development names proposed for, or already appearing in, condominium documents (if application; indicate whether proposed or existing) Randall Curve MPUD Please Return Approved Checklist By: ❑• Email ❑ Fax ❑ Personally picked up Applicant Name: Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. Phone: 239-947-1144 Email/Fax: sumpenhour@gradyminor.com Signature on Addressing Checklist does not constitute Project and/or Street Name approval and is subject to further review by the Operations Division. FOR STAFF USE ONLY Folio Number 37690040003 Folio Number 37690040100 Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Approved b e Date: 05/08/2020 NN Y s� Updated by: Date: IF OLDER THAN 6 MONTHS, FORM MUST BE UPDATED OR NEW FORM SUBMITTED Rev. 6/9/2017 Page 2 of 2 Collier County Property Appraiser Property Summary Site Site Zone Parcel No 37690040003 Address Site City *Note *Disclaimer, Map No. Strap No. Section Township Range Acres *Estimated 3C22 332500 A 13C22 22 48 27 47.57 Legal GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 22 TRACT A, LESS THAT PORTION OF TRACT "A" AS DESC IN OR 3080 PG 723, AS AMENDED IN OR 4079 PG 1358 Millage Area 285 Milla a Rates *Calculations Sub./Condo 332500 - GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 22 School Other Total Use Code & 86 - COUNTIES INCLUDING NOW 5.083 8.5571 13.6401 iMUNICIPAL GOV. Latest Sales History (Not all Sales are listed due to Confidentiality) Date Book -Page Amount 07/28/06 4079-1356 $ 0 11/16/05 3930-356 $ 0 06/30/88 1361-2019 $ 0 2019 Preliminary Tax Roll (Subject to Change) Land Value $ 2,854,200 +� Improved Value $ 0 (_) Market Value $ 2,854,200 (-) 10% Cap $ 2,356,989 (_) Assessed Value $ 497,211 (_) School Taxable Value $ 0 (_) Taxable Value $ 0 If all Values shown above equal 0 this parcel was created after the Final Tax Roll Collier County Property Appraiser Property Summary Site 2470 4TH Parcel No 37690040100 Address ST NE Site City NAPLES *Disclaimer Name / Addre COLLIER CNTY C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 CitJ9 NAPLES State FL Site Zone 34120 *Note Zip 34112 Map No. Strap Now Section Township Range Acres *Estimated 3C22 332500 A 23C22 1 22 48 27 1 9.9 GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 22 THAT PORTION OF TRACT "A" AS DESC IN OR 3080 Legal PG 723, AS CORRECTED IN OR 4079 PG 1358 AND THAT PORTION OF TRACT A AS DESC IN OR 4079 PG 1361 Millage Area 4 285 1 Millage Rates 0 *Calculations Sub./Condo 332500 - GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 22 School Other Total Use Code 0 86 - COUNTIES INCLUDING NOW 5.083 8.5571 13.6401 _jMUNICIPAL GOV. Latest Sales History 2019 Certified Tax Roll Not all Sales are listed due to Confidentiality) Sub'ect to Change) ate ook-Pa a Amoun Land Value $ 253,080 07/28/06 4079-1358 $ 0 (+) Improved Value $ 21,052 07/26/02 3080-723 $ 161,700 (_) Market Value $ 274,132 (-) 10% Cap $ 33,380 (_) Assessed Value $ 240,752 (_) School Taxable Value $ 0 (_) Taxable Value $ 0 If all Values shown above equal 0 this parcel was created after the Final Tax Roll Collier County Property Appraiser Property Aerial Site Parcel No 37690040003 Address Site City Site Zone *Note *Disclaimer, I 1 iY 116, .rv. 1 ��-_-. ,y `4 ■{I � Syr ��.. �� s�l+p 0=5 Ift Open GIS in a New Window with More Features. Collier County Property Appraiser Property Aerial Site 2470 4TH Parcel No 37690040100 Address ST NE Site City NAPLES *Disclaimer -'H 251hAVE WL 25ihAVE HE r .'• 1 Dargamot LN Ca4harCounil? ProPnrIyAPPramur.NaPlo FL. Open GIS in a New Window with More Features. Site Zone 34120 *Note IN Immokalee Road/4th Street N.E. Mixed Use Subdistrict (PL20190002355) Exhibit V.G6 Pre -application Meeting Notes May 7, 2020 ® GradyMinor Exhibit Cover Pages. docx CM] Fngfneers • band Surveyors • Planners • Landscape Architects Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, FL 34134 • 239-947-1144 • engineering@gradyminor.com • www.gradyminor.com CoiLier County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 Pre -Application Meeting Notes Petition Type: PUDR Date and Time: Wednesday, 10/30/19 4:00 P.M. Assigned Planner: Nancy Gundlach Engineering Manager (for PPL's and FP's): Project Information Project Name: Immokalee Road Commercial Center PL#: PL20190002356 Property ID #: 37690040003 Project Address: Applicant: Sharon Agent Name: Ri Current Zoning: E City: Naples State: FL enhour Arnold, AICP D. Yovanovich Zip: 34112 Phone: (239) 947-1144 1 1. 0. Agent/Firm Address:3800 Via Del Ray City: Springs State: FL Zip: 34134 Property Owner: Collier Cnty C/O Real Property Management Please provide the following, if applicable: i. Total Acreage: ii. Proposed # of Residential Units: iii. Proposed Commercial Square Footage: iv. For Amendments, indicate the original petition number: V. If there is an Ordinance or Resolution associated with this project, please indicate the type and number: vi. If the project is within a Plat, provide the name and AR#/PL#: Updated 7/11/2019 Page 1 1 of 5 C0 er County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net ©© '239) 25;-2400 ZMnl���t�e� �l )CA Cor Meeting Notes As of 10/16/2017 all Zoning applications have revised applications, and your associated Application is included in your notes; additionally a *new Property Ownership Disclosure Form is required for all applications. A copy of this new form is included in your pre-app Note — link is his://www.colliergov.net/Home/ShowDocument?id=75093. wgdlilEld Pli teAtc.o puEely Zo+,JES. SEE Checl-II,s l' If Site is within the City of Naples Water Service Area please send to Naples Utilities and Planning Departments. Then, if the petition is submitted, we are to send it iby email) to the four persons below in their Utilities and Planning Depts. - along with a request that they send us a letter or email of "no objection" to the petition. Bob Middleton RMiddleton(cDnaolesgov.com Allyson Holland AM HollandQnaplesgOV.com Robin Singer RSingerrrDnaolesgov.com Erica Martin emartin ar)naplesgoy.com Disclaimer Information provided by staff to applicant during the Pre -Application Meeting is based on the best available data at the time of the meeting and may not fully inform the applicant of issues that could apse during the process. The Administrative Code and LDC dictates the regulations which all applications must satisfy. Any checklists provided of required data for an application may not fully outline what is needed. It is the applicant's responsibility to provide all required data. Updated 7/11/2019 Page 1 2 of 5 Environmental PUDZ-Pp Chec U) ist (non-RFM Project Name mrlo P( d C,,ZYC)CJ V is the project is in compliance with the overlays, districts and/or zoning on the subject site and/or the surrounding properties? (CON, ST, PUD, RLSA, RFMU, etc.) (LDC 2.03.05-2.03.08; 4.08.00) Not in CV Library GSubmit a current aerial photograph (available from the Property Appraiser's office) and clearly delineate the subject site boundary lines. If the site is vegetated, provide FLUCFCS overlay and vegetation inventory identifying upland, wetland and exotic vegetation (Admin. Code Ch. 3 G.1. Application Contents 424). FLUCFCS Overlay -P627 UClearly identify the location of all preserves and label each as "Preserve" on all plans. (LDC 3.05.07.H.1). Preserve Label- P546 6 Provide calculations on site plan showing the appropriate acreage of native vegetation to be retained, the max. amount and ratios permitted to be created on -site or mitigated off -site. Exclude vegetation located within utility and drainage easements from the preserve calculations (LDC 3.05.07.13-1); 3.05.07.F; 3.05.07.H. Ld-e). Preserve Calculation - P547 �5 Created and retained preserve areas shall meet the minimum width requirements per LDC 3.05.07.H.1.b. Preserve Width - P603 �6 Retained preservation areas shall be selected based on the criteria defined in LDC 3.05.07.A.3, include all 3 strata, be in the largest contiguous area possible and shall be interconnected within the site and to adjoining off -site preservation areas or wildlife corridors. (LDC 3.05.07.A.14) Preserve Selection- P550 CPrinciple structures shall be located a minimum of 25' from the boundary of the preserve boundary. No accessory structures and other site alterations, fill placement, grading, plant alteration or removal, or similar activity shall be permitted within 10' of the boundary unless it can be shown that it will not affect the integrity of the preserve (i.e. stem wall or berm around wetland preserve). Provide cross -sections for each preserve boundary identifying all site alterations within 25'. (LDC 3.05.07.H.3; 6.01.02.C.) Preserve Setback —New 8. Wildlife survey required for sites where an EIS is not required, when so warranted. (LDC 10.02.02.A.2.f) Listed Species - P522 Provide Environmental Data identifying author credentials, consistency determination with the GMPs, off -site preserves, seasonal and historic high water levels, and analysis of water quality. For land previously used for farm fields or golf course, provide soil sampling/groundwater monitoring reports identifying any site contamination. (LDC 3.08.00) Environmental Data Required — P 522 10. PUD Document and Master Plan shall state the minimum acreage required to be preserved. (LDC 10.02.13.A.2) Master Plan Contents-P626 11. If the PUD includes a Preserve Tract section A. Principal Use: Preserve B. Accessory Uses: Uses subject to LDC section Allowable uses within County required preserves Alternate format. If the agent insists on listing speck uses under Accessory Uses, the following language shall be used for B: B. Passive uses are allowed within preserves to provide for access to the preserve, as long as any clearing required to facilitate these uses does not impact the minimum required native vegetation or cause loss of function to the preserve. Passive uses are subject to LDC section Allowable uses within County required preserves: 1. Pathways 2. Stormwater only when in accordance with the LDC. PUD Commitments and Site Plan notes Where preserves occur adjacent to development off site and will be used in lieu of landscape buffers, include the following condition in the environmental commitments section of the PUD document or master plan: Preserves may be used to satisfy the landscape buffer requirements after exotic vegetation removal in accordance with LDC sections 4.06.02 and 4.06.05.E.1. Supplemental plantings with native plant materials shall be in accordance with LDC section 3.05.07. l2. PUD Document shall identify any listed species found on site and/or describe any unique vegetative features that will be preserved on the site. (LDC 10.02.13.A.2.) Unique Features- P628 Example: A management plan for the entire project shall be submitted in accordance with the requirements and procedures of the LDC for listed species including but not limited to Black Bear, Gopher Tortoise and listed birds. The management plan shall be submitted prior to development of the first phase of the project. 13. Review cross -sections if provided; they are not required with the PUD. However, sometimes they are provided. Is there any fill proposed in the preserve? Additional Comments: Environmental Data Checklist Project Name IM— [ QKgIecf�atp04 C0mfYleic)6C.1 The Environmental Data requirements can be found in LDC Section 3.08.00 l0 Provide the EIS fee if PUD or CU. 2© WHO AND WHAT COMPANY PREPARED THE ENVIRONMENTAL DATA REPORT? Preparation of Environmental Data. Environmental Data Submittal Requirements shall be prepared by an individual with academic credentials and experience in the area of environmental sciences or natural resource management. Academic credentials and experience shall be a bachelor's or higher degree in one of the biological sciences with at least two years of ecological or biological professional experience in the State of Florida. 0 Identify on a current aerial, the location and acreage of all SFWMD jurisdictional wetlands according to the Florida Land Use Cover and Forms Classification System (FLUCFCS) and include this information on the SDP or final plat construction plans. Wetlands must be verified by the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) or Florida Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) prior to SDP or final plat construction plans approval. For sites in the RFMU district, provide an assessment in accordance with 3.05.07 F and identify on the FLUCFCS map the location of all high quality wetlands (wetlands having functionality scores of at least 0.65 WRAP or 0.7 UMAM) and their location within the proposed development plan. Sites with high quality wetlands must have their functionality scores verified by the SFWMD or DEP prior to first development order approval. Where functionality scores have not been verified by either the SFWMD or DEP, scores must be reviewed and accepted by County staff, consistent with State regulation. 4. SDP or final plat construction plans with impacts to five (5) or more acres of wetlands shall provide an analysis of potential water quality impacts of the project by evaluating water quality loadings expected from the project (post development conditions considering the proposed land uses and stormwater management controls) compared with water quality loadings of the project area as it exists in its pre -development conditions. The analysis shall be performed using methodologies approved by Federal and State water quality agencies, and must demonstrate no increase in nutrients (nitrogen and phosphorous) loadings in the post development scenario. 5. Where treated stormwater is allowed to be directed into preserves, show how the criteria in 3.05.07 H have been met. Will Stormwater be directed in the wetland preserves? I 6. Where native vegetation is retained on site, provide a topographic map to a half foot and, where possible, provide elevations within each of the FLUCFCS Codes identified on site. For SDP or final plat construction plans, include this information on the site plans. If wetlands will be used for stormwater provide the topo map 07 Provide a wildlife survey for the nests of bald eagle and for listed species known to inhabit biological communities similar to those existing on site. The survey shall be conducted in accordance with the guidelines or recommendations of the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FFWCC) and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). Survey times may be reduced or waived where an initial habitat assessment by the environmental consultant indicates that the likelihood of listed species occurrence is low, as determined by the FFWCC and USFWS. Where an initial habitat assessment by the environmental consultant indicates that the likelihood of listed species occurrence is low, the survey time may be reduced or waived by the County Manager or designee, when the project is not reviewed or technical assistance not provided by the FFWCC and USFWS. Additional survey time may be required if listed species are discovered 8�. Provide a survey for listed plants identified in 3.04.03 0 Wildlife habitat management and monitoring plans in accordance with 3.04.00 shall be required where listed species are utilizing the site or where wildlife habitat management and monitoring plans are required by the FFWCC or USFWS. These plans shall describe how the project directs incompatible land uses away from listed species and their habitats. Identify the location of listed species nests, burrows, dens, foraging areas, and the location of any bald eagle nests or nest protection zones on the native vegetation aerial with FLUCFCS overlay for the site. Wildlife habitat management plans shall be included on the SDP or final plat construction plans. Bald eagle management plans are required for sites containing bald eagle nests or nest protection zones, copies of which shall be included on the SDP or final plat construction plans. 10. For sites or portions of sites cleared of native vegetation or in agricultural operation provide documentation that the parcel(s) were issued a permit to be cleared and are in compliance with the 25 year rezone limitation pursuant to section 10.02.06. For sites permitted to be cleared prior to July 2003, provide documentation that the parcel(s) are in compliance with the 10 year rezone limitation previously identified in the GMP. Criteria defining native vegetation and determining the legality, process and criteria for clearing are found in 3.05.05, 3.05.07 and 10.02.06. 11 Identify on a current aerial the acreage, location and community types of all upland and wetland habitats on the project site, according to the Florida Land Use Cover and Forms Classification System (FLUCFCS), and provide a legend for each of the FLUCFCS Codes identified. Aerials and overlay information must be legible at the scale provided. Provide calculations for the acreage of native vegetation required to be retained on -site. Include the above referenced calculations and aerials on the SDP or final plat construction plans. In a separate report, demonstrate how the preserve selection criteria pursuant to 3.05.07 have been met. Where applicable, include in this report an aerial showing the project boundaries along with any undeveloped land, preserves, natural flowways or other natural land features, located on abutting properties. 12. Include on a separate site plan, the project boundary and the land use designations and overlays for the RLSA, RFMU, ST and ACSC-ST districts. Include this information on the SDP or final plat construction plans. 13. Where off -site preservation of native vegetation is proposed in lieu of on -site, demonstrate that the criteria in section 3.05.07 have been met and provide a note on the SDP or final plat construction plans indicating the type of donation (monetary payment or land donation) identified to satisfy the requirement. Include on the SDP or final plat construction plans, a location map(s) and property identification number(s) of the off -site parcel(s) if off -site donation of land is to occur. 14. Provide the results of any Environmental Assessments and/or Audits of the property, along with a narrative of the measures needed to remediate if required by FDEP. 15. Soil and/or ground water sampling shall be required at the time of first development order submittal for sites that occupy farm fields (crop fields, cattle dipping ponds, chemical mixing areas), golf courses, landfill or junkyards or for sites where hazardous products exceeding 250 gallons of liquid or 1,000 pounds of solids were stored or processed or where hazardous wastes in excess of 220 pounds per month or 110 gallons at any point in time were generated or stored. The amount of sampling and testing shall be determined by a registered professional with experience in the field of Environmental Site Assessment and shall at a minimum test for organochlorine pesticides (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 8081) and Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) 8 metals using Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) soil sampling Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) FS 3000, in areas suspected of being used for mixing and at discharge point of water management system. Sampling should occur randomly if no points of contamination are obvious. Include a background soil analysis from an undeveloped location hydraulically upgradient of the potentially contaminated site. Soil sampling should occur just below the root zone, about 6 to 12 inches below ground surface or as otherwise agreed upon with the registered professional with experience in the field of Environmental Site Assessment. Include in or with the Environmental Site Assessment, the acceptable State and Federal pollutant levels for the types of contamination found on site and indicate in the Assessment, when the contaminants are over these levels. If this analysis has been done as part of an Environmental Audit then the report shall be submitted. The County shall coordinate with the FDEP where contamination exceeding applicable FDEP standards is identified on site or where an Environmental Audit or Environmental Assessment has been submitted. 16. Provide justification for deviations from environmental LDC provisions pursuant to GMP CCME Policy 6.1.1 (13), if requested. 17. Where applicable, provide evidence of the issuance of all applicable federal and/or state oil and gas permits for proposed oil and gas activities in Collier County. Include all state permits that comply with the requirements of Chapter 62C-25 through 62C-30, F.A.C., as those rules existed on January 13, 2005. 18. Identify any Wellfield Risk Management Special Treatment Overlay Zones (WRM-ST) within the project area and provide an analysis for how the project design avoids the most intensive land uses within the most sensitive WRM-STs and will comply with the WRM-ST pursuant to 3.06.00. Include the location of the Wellfield Risk Management Special Treatment Overlay Zones on the SDP or final plat construction plans. For land use applications such as standard and PUD rezones and CUs, provide a separate site plan or zoning map with the project boundary and Wellfield Risk Management Special Treatment Overlay Zones identified. 19. Demonstrate that the design of the proposed stormwater management system and analysis of water quality and quantity impacts fully incorporate the requirements of the Watershed Management regulations of 3.07.00. 20. For sites located in the Big Cypress Area of Critical State Concern -Special Treatment overlay district (ACSC- ST), show how the project is consistent with the development standards and regulations in 4.02.14. 21. For development orders within RFMU sending lands, show how the project is consistent with each of the applicable Objectives and Policies of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element of the GMP. 22. The County Manager or designee may require additional data or information necessary to evaluate the project's compliance with LDC and GMP requirements. (LDC 10.02.02.A.3 f) The following to be determined at preapplication meeting: (Choose those that apply) Provide overall description of project with respect to environmental and water management issues. b Explain how project is consistent with each of the applicable objectives and policies in the CCME of the GMP. PO1*5 6, I. I -V '1- 1. I Uc Explain how the project meets or exceeds the native vegetation preservation requirement in the CCME and LDC. d. Indicate wetlands to be impacted and the effects of the impact to their functions and how the project's design compensates for wetland impacts. Address each one. Qe. Indicate how the project design minimizes impacts to listed species. Describe the measures that are proposed as mitigation for impacts to listed species. 23. PUD zoning and CU petitions. For PUD rezones and CU petitions, applicants shall collate and package applicable Environmental Data Submittal Requirements into a single Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) document, prior to public hearings and after all applicable staff reviews are complete. Copies of the EIS shall be provided to the County Manager or designee prior to public hearings. 24. Is EAC Review (by CCPC) required? +6 $E OE }Q. ffiwk � 14, r1 SST evlevJ 25. PUD master plan or PPL/SDP site plan notes: Where preserves occur adjacent to development off site and will be used in lieu of landscape buffers, include the following condition in the environmental commitments section of the PUD document. Preserves may be used to satisfy the landscape buffer requirements after exotic vegetation removal in accordance with LDC sections 4.06.02 and 4.06.05.E.1. Supplemental plantings with native plant materials shall be in accordance with LDC section 3.05.07. A note needs to be added to the MCP and preserve as a buffer needs to be added to the commitments. 26. Additional comments 27. Stipulations for approval (Conditions) ____— - OranU. Troe'Boulevard I*” i� f 0 a Inlet cove. .200 i .. :? • �' - f .r_ ,r 25thAve nuel Northeast - -- rh'3'T-i I cof fi8r County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION www.colliergov.net _r I, Meeting Notes PL20190002356. 10/30/19. 4rm 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 Landscape: Label buffers by type and width on master plan. Type 'B' buffer where abutting estates lots. Type'D' buffer along Immokalee Rd. Collier County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net :EcY>^ l06I F e-. 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239)252-2400 �J�'lrn�f-U Other required documentation for submittal Inot listed on application .) Disclaimer: Information provided by staff to applicant during the Pre -Application Meeting is based on the best available data at the time of the meeting and may not fully inform the applicant of issues that could arise during the process. The Administrative Code and LDC dictates the regulations which all applications must satisfy. Any checklists provided of required data for an application may not fully outline what is needed. It is the applicant's responsibility to provide all required data. Updated 7/11/2019 Page I Aof 5 Transportation Planning and PUD Monitoring Pre-App Notes Developer Commitments: Transportation Planning " The maximum total daily trip generation for the PUD shall not exceed _ two-way PM peak hour net trips based on the use codes in the ITE Manual on trip generation rates in effect at the time of application for SDP/SDPA or subdivision plat approval." Use Codes Provide both ITE and SIC use codes in the TIS. PUD Monitoring "One entity (hereinafter the Managing Entity) shall be responsible for PUD monitoring until close- out of the PUD, and this entity shall also be responsible for satisfying all PUD commitments until close-out of the PUD. At the time of this CPUD approval, the Managing Entity is the Insert Company Name Here. Should the Managing Entity desire to transfer the monitoring and commitments to a successor entity, then it must provide a copy of a legally binding document that needs to be approved for legal sufficiency by the County Attorney. After such approval, the Managing Entity will be released of its obligations upon written approval of the transfer by County staff, and the successor entity shall become the Managing Entity. As Owner and Developer sell off tracts, the Managing Entity shall provide written notice to County that includes an acknowledgement of the commitments required by the CPUD by the new owner and the new owner's agreement to comply with the Commitments through the Managing Entity, but the Managing Entity shall not be relieved of its responsibility under this Section. When the PUD is closed -out, then the Managing Entity is no longer responsible for the monitoring and fulfillment of PUD commitments." Miscellaneous "Pursuant to Section 125.022(5) F.S., issuance of a development permit by a county does not in any way create any rights on the part of the applicant to obtain a permit from a state or federal agency and does not create any liability on the part of the county for issuance of the permit if the applicant fails to obtain requisite approvals or fulfill the obligations imposed by a state or federal agency or undertakes actions that result in a violation of state or federal law. All other applicable state or federal permits must be obtained before commencement of the development." Co1[ier County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (2391 252-2400 Pre -Application Meeting Sign -In Sheet PL# PL20190002356 Collier County Contact Information: Name Review Discipline Phone Email ❑ David AnthonyEnvironmental Review 252-2497 david.anthony@colliercountyfl.gov Eli ClaudineAuclair GMD Operations and Regulatory Management 252-5887 claudine.auclair@colliercountyfl.gov Sally Ashkar Assistant County Attorney 252-8842 sally.ashkar@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Steve Baluch Transportation Planning 252-2361 stephen.baluch@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Ra Bellows Zoning, Planning Manager 252-2463 raymond.bellows@colliercountyfl.gov Laurie Beard PUD Monitoring 252-5782 laurie.beard@colliercountyfl.gov !izcraig Brown Environmental Specialist 252-2548 craig.brown@colliercountyfl.gov Alexandra Casanova Operations Coordinator 252-2658 Alexandra.casanova@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Heidi Ashton Cicko Managing Asst. County Attorney 2S2-8773 heidi.ashton@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Thomas Clarke Operations Coordinator 252-2584 thomas.clarke@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Jamie Cook Prin. Environmental Specialist 252-6290 Jaime.cook@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Eric Fey, P.E. Utility Planning 252-1037 eric.fey@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Tim Finn, AICP Zoning Division 252-4312 timothy.finn@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Sue Faulkner Comprehensive Planning 252-5715 sue.faulkner@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Jeremy Frantz LDC Manager 252-2305 Jeremy.Frantz@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ James French Growth Management Deputy Department Head 252-5717 'ames.french@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Michael Gibbons Structural/Residential Plan Review 252-2426 michael.gibbons@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ 5torm Gewirtz, P.E. Engineering Stormwater 252-2434 storm.gewirtz@colliercountyfl.gov Nancy Gundlach, AICP, PLA Zoning Division 252-2484 nancy.gundiach@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Richard Henclerlong Principal Planner 252-2464 richard.henderlong@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ John Houldsworth Engineering Subdivision 252-5757 john.houldsworth@coiliercountyfl.gov ❑ Alicia Humphries Right -Of -Way Permitting 252-2326 alicia.hum hries@ olliercountyfl.gov ❑ Erin Jose hitis Environmental Specialist, Senior 252-2915 erin.josephitis@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Marcia Kendall Comprehensive Planning 252-2387 marcia.kendall@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ jphn Kelly Zoning Senior Planner 252-5719 john.kelly@colliercountyfl.gov Diane Lynch Operations Analyst 252-8243 diane.lynch@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Gil Martinez Zoning Principal Planner 252-4211 gilbert.martinez@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Thomas Mastroberto Greater Naples Fire 252-7348 thomas.mastroberto@colliercountyfl.gov Updated 7/11/2019 Page 1 4 of 5 Collier County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.collierizov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239)252-2400 ❑ Jack McKenna, P.E. Engineering Services 252-2911 jack.mckenna@co liercountyfl.gov ❑ Matt McLean, P.E. Development Review Director 252-8279 matthew.mclean@colliercountyfl.gov michele.mosca@colliercountytl.gov ❑ Michele Mosca, AICP Capital Project Planning 252-2466 ❑ nnis Moxam Addressing 252-5519 annis.moxam@colliercountytl.gov Richard Orth Stormwater Planning 252-5092 richard.orth@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Brandy Otero Transit 252-5859 brandy.otero@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Brandi Pollard Utility Impact fees 252-6237 brandi.pollard@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Todd Riggall North Collier Fire 597-9227 triggall@northcolllerfire.com ❑ Brett Rosenblum, P.E. Development Review Principal Project Manager 252-2905 brett.rosenblum@colliercountyfl.gov James Sabo, AICP Zoning Principal Planner 252-2708 james.sabo@collier o.net ❑ Michael Sawyer Transportation Planning 252-2926 michael.sawyer@colliercountyfl.gov Corby Schmidt, AICP Comprehensive Planning 252-2944 corby.schmidt@colliercountyfl. ov ❑ Chris Scott, AICP Development Review -Zonin 252-2460 chris.scott@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Linda Simmons North Collier Fire 252-2311 Linda.Simmons@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Peter Shawinsky Architectural Review 252-8523 peter.shawinsky@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Camden Smith Zoning Operations Manager 252-1042 camden.smith@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Mark Strain Hearing Examiner/CCPC 252-4446 mark.strain@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Mark Templeton Landscape Review 252-2475 mark.templeton@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Jessica Velasco Zoning Division Operations 252-2584 jessica.velasco@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Jon Walsh, P.E. Building Review 252-2962 jonathan.walsh@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ David Weeks, AICP Comprehensive Planning Future Land Use Consistent 252-2306 david.weeks@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Kirsten Wilkie Environmental Review Manager 252-5518 kirsten.wilkie@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Christine Willoughby Development Review - Zonin 252-5748 christine.willoughby@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Daniel Zunzune ui North Collier Fire 252-2310 Daniel.Zunzunegui@colliercountyfl.gov Eller Additions (Ylur(� apef��s goo �rctior aSa_S�S$ elle�.M�rr�rQc,,II,e2u���fl.9oy Attendee anintad Information: �1 fl84 . - • 7 LPL • • Ms. '!Z qIM yaw Updated 7/11/2019 Page 1 5 of 5 )rn EIIenMurrayVEN From: Sharon Umpenhour <SUmpenhour@gradyminor.com> Sent: Friday, October 25, 2019 1:54 PM To: EIIenMurrayVEN Cc: GundlachNancy; SmithCamden Subject: RE: Supplemental Form for Immokalee Road Commercial Center (PUDZ) - PL20190002356 Attachments: FORM Pre -Application Meeting Supplemental Information.docx EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Good afternoon, Attached is the completed preapp form. Sharon Umpenhour Senior Planning Technician From: EIIenMurrayVEN <Ellen.Murray@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Friday, October 25, 2019 11:11 AM To: Sharon Umpenhour <SUmpenhour@gradyminor.com> Cc: GundlachNancy <Nancy.Gundlach@colliercountyfl.gov>; SmithCamden <Camden.Smith@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: Supplemental Form for Estates Shopping Center (PUDA) - PL20190002354 Good Morning Sharon, I have received a request for a Zoning Pre -Application meeting for Immokalee Road Commercial Center (PUDR) - PI-20190002356. I have attached a Supplemental Form for you to complete and return to me as soon as possible. Please include any Plans, Surveys or additional information that would help our Planners to be better prepared for your meeting. The meeting is scheduled for Wednesday 10/30/19 at 4:00 PM in Conference Room C here in the building. Respectfully, sm. e. %on" Ellen C. Murray Operations Coordinator 1 A. Applicant/Agent may also send site County plans or conceptual plans for �J review in advance if desired. Growth Management D Zoning Division PL20190002356 — Immokalee Road Commercial Center (PUDZ) PRE-APP INFORMATION Assigned Ops Staff: Ellen Murray Camden Smith, (Ops Staff) STAFF FORM FOR SUPPLEMENTAL PRE -APPLICATION MEETING INFORMATION • Name and Number of who submitted pre-app request Sharon Umpenhour / 239-947-1144 / sum oenhour(dDgradyminor.com • Agent to list for PL# D. Wayne Arnold, AICP, Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. Richard D. Yovanovich, Coleman, Yovanovich & Koester, P.A. "Please copy Sharon Umpenhour (sumpenhour@gradyminor.com) on all emails pertaining to this project. • Owner of property (all owners for all parcels) 37690040003 — Collier County • Confirm Purpose of Pre-App: (Rezone, etc.) Rezone to PUD • Please list the details of the project including density, proposed or considered uses for the project, size of commercial vs. residential, number of homes/units/offices/docks (any that apply): Rezone to allow a maximum of 450,000 square feet of commercial development and 300 multi -family dwelling units. Details about Project (choose type that applies): PUD — is this a phased development, adding uses to an existing PUD or what changes are you proposing or what project are you seeking input for. Is there any specific Tract or addition of a Tract/Use? REQUIRED Supplemental Information provided by: Sharon Umpenhour Senior Planning Technician sumpenhour@gradyminor.com 239-947-1144 Zoning Dmsion • 2800 North Horseshoe Drive • Naples. Florida 34104. 239-252-2400 • wwwcolliergwrat Collier County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net _ I \n/IIAA (-\'/ 0 I /A A A IAA f) I114.2�9) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 ittal Requirement Checklist for: PUD Rezone- Ch. 3 G. 1 of the Administrative Code Amendment to PUD- Ch. 3 G. 2 of the Administrative Code PUD to PUD Rezone- Ch. 3 G. 1 of the Administrative Code The following Submittal Requirement checklist is to be utilized during the Pre -Application Meeting and at time of application submittal. At final submittal, the checklist is to be completed and submitted with an up-to-date application. Please provide the submittal items in the exact order listed below, with cover sheets attached to each section. Incomplete submittals will not be accepted. A Model PUD Document is available online at http://www.colliercountyfl.gov/Home/ShowDocument?id=76983. REQUIREMENTS COPIES REQUIRED NOT REQUIRED Cover Letter with Narrative Statement including a detailed description of amendment is necessary 1 El Completed Application with required attachments (download latestverslon) 1 Pre -application meeting notes 1 ❑ ❑ Affidavit of Authorization, signed and notarized 1 Property Ownership Disclosure Form 1 Notarized and completed Covenant of Unified Control 1 Completed Addressing Checklist 1 Warranty Deed(s) 1 ❑ List Identifying Owner and all parties of corporation 1 ❑ Signed and sealed Boundary Survey 1 ❑ Architectural Rendering of proposed structures 1 ❑ Current Aerial Photographs (available from Property Appraiser) with boundary and, if vegetated, FLUCFCS Codes with legend included on aerial. 1 El Statement of Utility Provisions 1 ❑ Environmental Data Requirements pursuant to LDC section 3.08.00 1 ❑ Environmental Data Requirements collated into a single Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) packet at time of public hearings. Coordinate with project planner at time of public hearings. ❑ [� ❑ Listed or Protected Species survey, less than 12 months old. Include of previous surveys. 1 y{ IJ El Traffic Impact Study 1 ❑ Historical Survey 1Z ❑ School Impact Analysis Application, if applicable 1 ❑ ❑ Electronic copy of all required documents 1 ❑ Completed Exhibits A-F (see below for additional information)' ❑ �� ❑ List of requested deviations from the I�DC with justification for each (this document is separate from Exhibit E) — lJ ❑ El ❑ Check lily continue o next page February I, 2019 Page 9 of 11 COlLier County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX; L i52-6358 Revised Conceptual Master Site Plan 24" x 36"and One 8 Y," x 11" copy ❑ Original PUD document/ordinance, and Master Plan 24" x 36" — Only if Amending the PUD ❑ ❑ Revised PUD document with changes crossed thru & underlined 1 ❑ Copy of Official Interpretation and/or Zoning Verification 1 ❑ *If located in Immokalee or seeking affordable housing, include an additional set of each submittal requirement `The following exhibits are to be completed on a separate document and attached to the application packet: tXExhibit A: List of Permitted Uses ��"/ Exhibit B: Development Standards I/ Exhibit C: Master Plan- See Chapter 3 E. 1. of the Administrative Code Exhibit D: Legal Description Exhibit E: List of Requested LDC Deviations and justification for each Exhibit F: List of Development Commitments If located in RFMU (Rural Fringe Mixed Use) Receiving Land Areas Pursuant to LDC subsection 2.03.08.A.2.a.2.(b.)i.c., the applicant must contact the Florida Forest Service at 239- 690-3500 for information regarding "Wildfire Mitigation & Prevention Plan." PLANNERS — INDICATE IF THE PETITION NEEDS TO BE ROUTED TO THE FOLLOWING REVIEWERS - School District (Residential Components): Amy Lockheart ❑ Conservancy of SWFL: Nichole Johnson Utilities Engineering: Eric Fey Parks and Recreation: Barry Williams (Director) Emergency Management: Dan Summers Immokalee Water/Sewer District: City of Naples: Robin Singer, Planning Director Other: City of Naples Utilities Other: I ASSOCIATED FEES FOR APPLICATION I v Pye-Application Meeting: $500.00 PUD Rezone: $10,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre PUD to PUD Rezone: $8,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre PUD Amendment: $6,000.00* plus $25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre JComprehensive Planning Consistency Review: $2,250.00 Environmental Data Requirements -EIS Packet (submittal determined at pre -application meeting): $2,500.00 ti* Listed or Protected Species Review (when an EIS is not required): $1,000.00 Transportation Review Fees: Methodology Review: $500.00 *Additional fees to be determined at Methodology Meeting. o Minor Study Review: $750.00 o Major Study Review $1,500.00 February 1, 2019 Page 10 of 11 Coi[ier County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.collierizov.net Legal Advertising Fees: CC: $500.00 School Concurrency Fee, if applicable: 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 o Mitigation Fees, if application, to be determined by the School District in coordination with the County Fire Code Plans Review Fees are not listed, but are collected at the time of application submission and those fees are set forth by the Authority having jurisdiction. The Land Development Code requires Neighborhood Notification mailers for Applications headed to hearing, and this fee is collected prior to hearing. All checks payable to: Board of County Commissioners. As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is included in this submittal package. I understand that failure to include all necessary submittal information may result in the delay of processing this petition. *Additional fee for the 5' and subsequent re -submittal will be accessed at 20% of the original fee. Signature of Petitioner or Agent Printed named of signing party Date February 1, 2019 Page 11 of 11 AFFIDAVIT OF COMPLIANCE Petitions PL20190002355 Immokalee Road/4th Street N.E. Mixed Use Subdistrict (GMPA) and PL20190002356, Randall Curve MPUD Rezone (PUDZ) I hereby certify that pursuant to Ordinance 2004-41, of the Collier County Land Development Code, I did cause the attached newspaper advertisement to appear and I did give notice by mail to the following property owners and/or condominium and civic associations whose members may be affected by the proposed land use changes of an application request for a rezoning, PUD amendment, or conditional use, at least 15 days prior to the scheduled Neighborhood Information Meeting. For the pui poses of this requirement, the names and addresses of property owners shall be deemed those appearing on the latest tax rolls of Collier County and any other persons or entities who have made a formal request of the county to be notified. The said notice contained the laymen's description of the site property of proposed change and the date, time, and place of a Neighborhood Information Meeting. Per the attached letters, property owner's list, and copy of newspaper advertisement which are hereby made a part of this Affidavit of Compliance. D. ti ayne Arnold, AICP State of Florida County of Lee The foregoing Affidavit of compliance was acknowledged before me this November 23, 2020 by D. Wayne Arnold, AICP, who is personally known to me. (Sign t e of Not ublic) Kimberly A. Scher WCOMM90 #G02816Vf,•z EXPM:DeowW12,2022 Printed Name of Notary ,.4gF•' ten u Pd&UndW* GradyMinor Civil Engineers • Land SurveNsorS • PlanncrS • T,andsczipc Architects NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING Petitions PL20190002355 Immokalee Road/4th Street N.E. Mixed Use Subdistrict (GMPA) and PL20190002356, Randall Curve MPUD Rezone (PUDZ) A Neighborhood Information Meeting hosted by D. Wayne Arnold, AICP, of Q. Grady Minor and Associates, P.A. and Richard D. Yovanovich, Esq. of Coleman, Yovanovich & Koester, P.A., representing Richard D. Yovanovich as Successor Trustee (Applicant) will be held on Wednesday, December 9, 2020, 5:30 pm at North Collier Regional Park Exhibit Hall — Room A, 15000 Livingston Road, Naples 34109. Individuals who would like to participate remotely or have questions or comments should contact Sharon Umpenhour, Senior Planning Technician with Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. by email: sumpenhour@gradyminor.com, phone: 239-947-1144, or mail: 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, FL 34134. Project information is posted online at www.gradyminor.com/planning. Richard D. Yovanovich as Successor Trustee has submitted formal applications to Collier County, seeking approval of a Growth Management Plan (GMP) Amendment and a Planned Unit Development (PUD) Rezone. The GMP amendment proposes to amend the Golden Gate Area Master Plan, Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub -Element to establish the Immokalee Road/4th Street N.E. Mixed Use Subdistrict. The new subdistrict will provide for a variety of retail, office, personal service and residential land uses to allow a maximum of 150,000 square feet of nonresidential uses and a maximum of 400 residential dwelling units. The companion PUD rezone proposes to rezone the property from E, Estates to the Randall Curve Mixed Use Planned Development (MPUD) to allow development of the property with the retail, office, personal service and a variety of residential land use types. Access to the property will be via Immokalee Road and a vehicular interconnection with the property located immediately north of the subdistrict. The subject property is comprised of 50.18± acres located on the northeast corner of Immokalee Road and 4t" Street N.E. in Section 22, Township 48 South, Range 27 East, Collier County, Florida. SUBJECT , PROPERTY Grove DR w a LU W a o— N S � a � w Project Location Map �o� c qQ .r 25th AVE NE 25th AVE NE a♦O� f O� F� Randall BLVD The Neighborhood Information Meeting is for informational purposes only, it is not a public hearing. Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. 3800 Via Del Rey Bonita Springs, FL 34134 Ph. 239-947-1144 Fax.239-947-0375 EB 0005151 LB 0005151 LC 26000266 www.gradyminor.com Notice: This data belongs to the Collier County Property Appraiser's Office (CCPA). Therefore, the recipient agrees not to represent this data to anyone as other than CCPA provided data. The recipient may not transfer this data to others without consent from the CCPA. Petition: PL20190002355(GMPA) & PL20190002356(PUDZ) I Buffer: 1000' 1 Date: 11/3/2020 1 Site Location - NAM NAME2 NAME3 NAME, AFFLECK, JESSICA T 2916 ORANGE GROVE TRL ALBY, JAMES B 2274 GROVE DR ALLEN, MICHAEL SHANE LINDSEY KATE ALLEN 2896 ORANGE GROVE TRL ALTER, JULIANNE M 2897 INLET COVE LN W ANGELA IGLESIAS REV TRUST 3213 W WOODLAWN AVE ARGUELLO, CLAUDIO & MARIA 2885 INLET COVE LN W AVALLONE, ENRICO ADINA-VIVANNE AVALLONE 2941 4TH ST NE BARBUTO, KARIE P 391 24TH AVE NE BAY ATLAS PROPERTIES INC 41 SEVILLE DR BCF/NORTH COLLIER FIRE RESCUE 1885 VETERANS PARK DR BCHD PARTNERS I LLC % DAVID GENSON 2600 GOLDEN GATE PKWY BCHD PARTNERS I LLC % DAVID GENSON 2600 GOLDEN GATE PKWY BCHD PARTNERS I LLC % DAVID GENSON 2600 GOLDEN GATE PKWY BCHD PARTNERS I LLC 2600 GOLDEN GATE PKWY ATTN: DAVIS GENSON BLUME, STEPHEN & MILAGROS 2820 39TH AVE NE BO, BRYAN & BRITTNEY 2887 BLOSSOM CT BOLLT TR, ROBERTO % ORANGETREE ASSOCIATES PO BOX 855 BOLLT TR, ROBERTO % ORANGETREE ASSOCIATES PO BOX 855 BOLLT TR, ROBERTO % ORANGETREE ASSOCIATES PO BOX 855 BOLLT TR, ROBERTO % ORANGETREE ASSOCIATES PO BOX 855 BOLLT TR, ROBERTO % ORANGETREE ASSOCIATES PO BOX 855 BOLLT TR, ROBERTO % ORANGETREE ASSOCIATES PO BOX 855 BOLLT TR, ROBERTO LAND AGREEMENT TRUST UTD 1/27/86 AND 6/26/96 BOOHER, RANDY L & AUDREY J LOUELLA L BOOHER EST 2849 INLET COVE LN W BRAUNSTEIN, SCOTT A & BRENDA L 2927 ORANGE GROVE TRL BUONGIORNO, RENEE 2860 2ND ST NE CANDELARIA JR, ORESTES 2275 GROVE DR CAPRIROLO, ALFREDO CLAUDIA A GONZALEZ 2920 ORANGE GROVE TRL CARANDANG, JESUS C & MARIA R 2922 INLET COVE LN E CARROLL III, JEREMIAH J LAUREN ANN CARROLL 2865 INLET COVE LN W CHANCY, BRIAN S & MARY M 2878 W INLET COVE LANE CIFUENTES, STEPHANIE 2926 INLET COVE LN E CITRUS GREENS AT ORANGETREE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION INC 1130 GROVE DR CLARK, LAWRENCE E BERNADETTE M CLARK 2860 BLOSSOM CT CLEARY, MICHAEL & DEANNA 2798 INLET COVE LN W COGSWELL, RICKY L & STELLA 2790 2ND ST NE COGSWELL, RICKY L & STELLA 2790 2ND ST NE COLLIER CNTY C/O REAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT 3335 TAMIAMI TR E, STE 101 COLLIER CNTY TRANSPORTATION RIGHT-OF-WAY 2885 HORSESHOE DRIVE S CONTRERAS, CARLOS & LILIANA 7859 BUCKS RUN DR COSSIO OSPINA, MARIA ELCY JOSE RAMON BURGOS 2939 ORANGE GROVE TRL CRISSEN, KELLY M 2822 INLET COVE LN W CRUZ, CHRISTIAN DAVID 2891 ORANGE GROVE TRL CRUZ, JUANA MARLENE 2809 INLET COVE LN W CURCIO, NICKOLAS R 2805 INLET COVE LANE W CURTISS INTERNATIONAL INC 2905 INLET COVE LN W CVS 75462 FL LLC % CAREMARK CORPORATION 1 CVS DR #4738-01 D'ANDREA, JAMES FRANCIS 7960 PRESERVE CIR #616 DANIEL, EDITH 1401 CROYDEN RD DARIS, ISMENE 2923 ORANGE GROVE TRL DEL CARMEN FRIAR, MARIA RONALD ARTHUR FRIAR 2894 INLET COVE LANE W DELUCCIA, DANIEL & GAIL 2868 BLOSSOM CT DENTON, ALAN L & CATHY A 263 25TH AVE NE DIE, ISMA A & ANDRE W ISMANDRACE DIE ANDRACHLINE DIE DIRAMACCA, JAMES K & KAREN L ISOBEL M DEMARS 2857 INLET COVE LN W DONALDSON, HANNELORE MARGOT GRAHAM 2770 INLET COVE LN W DONOSO, TERESA P SALAME 2813 INLET COVE LN W DUARTE, ADIELA & HERNANDO 2965 ORANGE GROVE TRAIL DUTTON, REVA A 2282 GROVE DR EDEN, KARINA KARINA MANCUSCO 2932 ORANGE GROVE TRL ELMEUS, KATHLEEN & RENEL 2921 INLET COVE LN E ENT, GERALD B & BETTY LOU 2936 ORANGE GROVE TRL ERVIN, DAVID J & MARIA 2903 ORANGE GROVE TRL ESCALERA, KEVIN D 2899 ORANGE GROVE TRL ESTRADA, FABIAN & VANESSA 2960 ORANGE GROVE TRL ESTRADA, RAUL & LISA A 2911 ORANGE GROVE TRL EVANS III, CLARK BRITTANY LENGACHER 2904 INLET COVE LN W EVANS, DENNIS R 2944 ORANGE GROVE TRAIL EVANS, EDWARD L & PATRICIA A 441 24TH AVE NE FALVEY, JEREMY JAMES & JULISSA 2832 INLET COVE LANE W FERNANDEZ, NESTOR & DOROTHY L 2948 ORANGE GROVE TRL FIGUEIREDO, FRANCISCO TAVARES MARIA DE LOURDES MUNIZ TAVARES 2883 BLOSSOM CT FIGUEROA, ANAMARIA DAVID FIGUEROA JR 2814 INLET COVE LN W FORBES, ROGEN & SHISHANA V 2873 INLET COVE LN W FRAZIER, ALAN W & SHARON S 2910 2ND ST NE GAGLIARDO, ADRIENNE 2875 BLOSSOM CT GAGLIARDO, ADRIENNE 2875 BLOSSOM CT GANDINI, ROSE AN IN T 2886 INLET COVE LN W GARCELL, LUIS 2856 BLOSSOM CT GARCIA, FERNANDO & SUSANA R 2915 ORANGE GROVE TRL GATT, JEFFREY A & MONICA L 2841 4TH ST NE GAUDIOSI, ARMAND & TERESA 2872 BLOSSOM CT 37690040003 & 37690040100 - NAME5_ NAME6 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7496 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7513 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7569 TAMPA, FL 33607--- 6627 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 7569 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1338 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 BRICK, NJ 08723 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1355 NAPLES, FL 34105 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34105 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34105 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34105 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7528 BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34133 --- 0 BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34133 --- 0 BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34133 --- 0 BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34133 --- 0 BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34133 --- 0 BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34133 --- 0 % ORANGETREE ASSOCIATES PO BOX 855 BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34133 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 7569 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7450 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1832 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7497 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7507 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1425 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7528 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7543 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1328 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1328 NAPLES, FL 34112 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34104 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 3904 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7450 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7559 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 7569 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 WOONSOCKET, RI 02895--- 6146 NAPLES, FL 34119 --- 0 BRIDGEWATER, NJ 08807--- 1310 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7450 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1360 2859 BLOSSOM COURT NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7569 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 7496 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7494 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7494 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7509 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7450 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7494 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7559 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 7569 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 4310 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7528 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7528 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7528 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7450 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1336 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 2A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 1-A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 2A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 7-A GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 23 TR 72 VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 7-A GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 22 N GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 23 GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 23 W GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 23 W1/2 GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 22 N GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 22 TR GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 22 TR GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 22 TR VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 7-A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 7-A ORANGE TREE UNIT TWO ORANGE TREE UNIT THREE VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 1-A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 1-A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 3A 22,23,24,25,&26 48 27 ALL, VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 7-A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 7-A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 1-A GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 22 S VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 1-A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 1-A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 2A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 7-A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 7-A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 2A LAKE LUCERNE TRACT A (DE) LESS VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 7-A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 5-A GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 22 S GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 22 N GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 22 GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 22 VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 7-A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 1-A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 7-A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 2A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 5-A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 5-A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 7-A NEIGHBORHOOD SHOPPES GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 22 N GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 22 N 1/2 VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 1-A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 7-A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 7-A GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 22 TR 91 VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 7-A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 7-A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 5-A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 5-A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 1-A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 1-A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 1-A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 2A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 1-A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 2A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 2A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 1-A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 2A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 7-A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 1-A GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 23 E VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 7-A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 1-A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 7-A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 5-A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 7-A GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 22 S VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 7-A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 7-A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 7-A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 7-A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 2A GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 22 N VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 7-A BILK D LOT 9 BILK A LOT 8 BILK D LOT 24 LOT 3 LOT 6 150FT OF TR 104 E 180FT TR 70 180FT OF TR 73 OF TR 54 OR 1206 PG 236 LESS 180FT OF TR 116 OR 294 PG 62 118 OR 1106 PG 403, LESS THAT 119, LESS THE EASTERLY 49 FT 120 LESS THAT PORTION FOR R/W LOT 50 LOT 37 CITRUS GREENS SECTION PH 4-A CITRUS GREENS SECTION PH, 1-A TRACT A BILK A LOT 1 TRACT C LESS GOLDEN GATE ESTS UNITS 22 TRACT D LOT 15 BILK E LOT 10 150FT OF TR 84 BILK C LOT 3 BILK D LOT 8 BILK D LOT 21 LOT 11 LOT 53 BILK D LOT 20 THAT PART FOR R/W AS DESC IN LOT 47 LOT 33 150FT OF TR 86 180FT OF TR 86 TRACT A, LESS THAT PORTION OF THAT PORTION OF TRACT "A" AS LOT 26 BILK E LOT 7 LOT 25 BILK F LOT 5 LOT 28 LOT 27 LOT 1 AT ORANGE TREE TRACT 3 180FT OF TR 84 OR 1494 PG 823 OF TR 85 BILK E LOT 11 LOT 56 LOT 45 OR 1255 PG 2074 LOT 32 LOT 13 LOT 38 LOT 29 BILK E LOT 1 BILK A LOT 6 BILK D LOT 5 BILK D LOT 10 BILK D LOT 4 BILK F LOT 2 BILK F LOT 3 BILK A LOT 5 BILK E LOT 14 LOT 58 BILK D LOT 2 150FT OF TR 73 OR 1481 PG 1257 LOT 27 BILK D LOT 1 LOT 36 LOT 30 LOT 9 180FT OF TR 83 LOT 29 LOT 34 LOT 55 LOT 48 BKL E LOT 13 150FT OF 102 OR 1689 PG 1036 LOT 44 LEGAL4 THAT PORTION FOR R/W DESC IN OR 3111 PG 0500 PORTION FOR R/W FOR R/W AS DESC IN OR 3111 PG 0500 AS DESC IN OR 3111 PG 485. LOT 1 THAT PT OF PARCEL 2 DESC AS THE W 25FT (R/W PER PLAT) 24 & 25, LESS ORANGETREE U 1 THRU 4, LESS CITRUS GREENS SEC OR 3111 PG 485 TRACT "A" AS DESC IN OR 3080 PG 723, AS AMENDED IN OR 4079 DESC IN OR 3080 PG 723, AS CORRECTED IN OR 4079 PG 1358 FOLIO ADDRESSTYPE 78698004408 U 78698000185 U 78698004709 U 78698109646 U 37745200002 U 78698109701 U 37697440004 U 37745080002 U 37745280006 U 37744080003 U 37698360002 U 37698440003 U 37698480005 U 37698520004 U 78698110583 U 78698110321 U 64697500108 U 64700628553 U 78698000020 U 78698000046 U 78698100069 U 00210440007 U 78698109581 U 78698109882 U 78698000826 U 37696280003 U 78698000444 U 78698000622 U 78698004644 U 78698109808 U 78698110648 U 78698004628 U 53360000108 U 78698110525 U 78698106704 U 37696400003 U 37696360004 U 37690040003 U 37690040100 U 78698110101 U 78698000761 U 78698110088 U 78698005025 U 78698106607 U 78698106584 U 78698109604 U 63810090069 U 37696240001 U 37696340008 U 78698000842 U 78698110703 U 78698110486 U 37696720000 U 78698110224 U 78698109840 U 78698106801 U 78698106623 U 78698000648 U 78698000143 U 78698000567 U 78698004424 U 78698000541 U 78698004961 U 78698004987 U 78698000127 U 78698004929 U 78698110745 U 78698000509 U 37745240004 U 78698110127 U 78698000486 U 78698110305 U 78698106649 U 78698109769 U 37696160000 U 78698110169 U 78698110266 U 78698110680 U 78698110541 U 78698004903 U 37697360003 U 78698110460 U POList 1000 PL20190002355-PL20190002356.xis GIBBY, MEL GM ADVISORS LLC GOLDMAN, GREENBAUM RISA GOMEZ, JUAN L & SYBLE D GOMEZ, M DE JESUS CIFUENTES GONZALES, RENE & YOLANDA GONZALEZ, IDALMYS GONZALEZ, JUAN HAYDEN, JAMES M & MARYJANE HEBBLE, DAVID T HEMMIT, EDWARD RAY& NATALIE HENRY S PICKANDS JR REV TRUST HERRERA, LAZARD A & ELIZABETH HINKEL, ANGELA M HONSBERGER, DENNIS & SHILREY HUGHES, EDWARD & KELLY JACQUELINE B FORBES REV TRUST JANKE, ANGELA J JONES, JEFFERY & DULCE A JONES, PAULA & STEPHEN JOUANET, JAMES JP MORGAN CHASE BK N A TR KILCOYNE, DENNIS & DIANE KING, DAVID ALAN KINNEY, STEVEN J KLINE, HAMERA KLINGENSMITH, JOHN J KROMMENHOEK,SCOTT KUOMAN, ALFONSO KUOMAN, RICHARD W & ANA MARIA KUOMAN, THAIS LABUZIENSKI, CHRISTINE A LECOMPTE, JENIFER & GERALD LEONE, SALVATORE & SANTA LEVENTHAL, JACOB & CAROLINA LEVY, NOAM LIKRAMA, GENTIAN & GERTA LITTLE, COLLIN J LOURO, MICHAEL & KORI L LSF9 MASTER PART TRUST LUKASZEW ICZ, ADAM LUND, MERRILL A & LINDA D LUSSIER, RONALD A & GRETCHEN S LYDON, JOHN P & KRISTEN MALEBRAN, CARLOS & TAYMI MARRETTA, KEVIN A & DEEANN R MARTINEZ, ALEXANDRA & SEGUNDO MARTINEZ, JOSEPH MARZANO,LAURA MCINERNEY, TAMMY CLAREY MEDINA, ERNESTO & MARIA MENDOLA, GERALD & JOANNE E MEUNIER, ANDREW C MK REALTY ORANGETREE LLC MOORE EST, FREDERICK B MOORER, CONRAD L & DELENE R MOREAU, MADITA MOYE, BRIAN C & MICHELLE L MUNOZ, EMILIO A MYB PROPERTIES LLC MYLI, STEVEN & DEANA NAFDOF 22 LLC NAGY, STEPHEN L NELSON, ARTHUR W & KAREN S NGUYEN, TINA H & JIMMY O GRADY, JAMES T & PATRICIA A ORTEGAJR,ERNESTO OSCEOLA, KARIE JO OSPINA, HERNAN D OSPINA, JORGE IVAN PAC OF COLLIER INC PAYAN,AARON PELLETIER, JOHN M & JENNIFER L PEREZ III, RAUL & ELISABETH PEREZ, ISIDORA PEREZ, JOSE & JULIE JEANELL PEREZ, MARIA C & CARLOS A PEREZ, MARIA ELENA PRATT, DONALD & KIMBERLY PROENZA TR, WALFRIDO S PROENZA, WALFRIDO PROGRESS RES BORROWER 2 LLC PUBLIX SUPER MARKETS INC RAHMAN, MOHAMMED M & FAHMIDA RAHMAN, MOHAMMED M & FAHMIDA RAKES, DARRIN & MARIA RAMOS JR, ABEL & TAMMY E RANDALL BOULEVARD LAND TRUST 2884 BLOSSOM CT 7675 SANTA MARGHERITA WAY ELISE GREENBAUM LEVINSON 320 25TH AVE NE ADRIANA LEDESMA 2680 2ND ST NE 2817 INLET COVE LN W VIOLETA ALVAREZ 2821 4TH ST NE 3766 E MONON RD 2966 ORANGE GROVE TRL 6925 CARLISLE CT 9661 SW 102ND AVENUE RD 2887 ORANGE GROVE TRL 2782 INLET COVE LN W 2818 INLET COVE LN W 2940 ORANGE GROVE TRL 2879 ORANGE GROVE TRL 2801 INLET COVE LN W 22 HIAWATHA DR 6245 DESOTO BLVD RICHARD D BREWER REST TRUST 675 104TH AVE N GLORIA LILLYANA KING 149 PINEHURST CIR 2892 BLOSSOM CT CANDACE KLINGENSMITH 2875 CYPRESS TRACE CIR #203 ROSA E ANGULO DE KUOMAN 2953 ORANGE GROVE TRL 2893 INLET COVE LN W KRISTEN L LABUZIENSKI 2901 INLET COVE LN W 15936 82ND ST 2861 INLET COVE LANE W MIRI ARMOZA 2762 INLET COVE LN 2841 INLET COVE LN W 2891 BLOSSOM CT %HUDSON HOMES MGMT LLC BEATA SUICK 2867 BLOSSOM CT 3040 ORANGE GROVE TRL 2794 INLET COVE LN W 2833 INLET COVE LN W 2283 GROVE DR 2781 INLET COVE LN W SHIRLEY K MENDEZ URIBE 2888 ORANGE GROVE TRL 3717 KAWKAWLIN RIVER DR 2531 4TH ST NE 2931 ORANGE GROVE TRL 3041 ORANGE GROVE TRL 6685 COLLIER BLVD 2625 4TH ST N E 2930 INLET COVE LN E LUCNER OLCIMA 2949 ORANGE GROVE TRL 2279 GROVE DR 8356 LAUREL LAKES BLVD 2660 2ND ST NE 2316 PINE RIDGE RD #453 2943 ORANGE GROVE TRL 2961 ORANGE GROVE TRL 2874 INLET COVE LN W 3030 ORANGE GROVE TRL PROVIDENCE DE AZA 2580 2ND ST NE LILIANA J LEDESMA 2898 INLET COVE LN W 5141 SEAHORSE AVE JAZMIN PAYAN ZULETA 2961 4TH ST NE 2864 BLOSSOM CT 3011 ORANGE GROVE TRL 2883 ORANGE GROVE TRAIL 3021 ORANGE GROVE TRL 2918 INLET COVE LN E 2825 INLET COVE LN W WALFRIDO S PROENZA TRUST 2655 4TH ST N E PO BOX 4090 PO BOX 32018 13056 VALEWOOD DR 13056 VALEWOOD DR 2820 2ND ST NE 2881 INLET COVE LN W %ANDREW DICKMAN LAW FIRM SUSAN GREENBAUM ROQUITE 1925 LARGO RD 2560 2ND ST NE 2792 BERGAMOT LN UTD 6/28/93 2871 4TH ST NE 2776 INLET COVE LN W 2848 INLET COVE LN W 2957 ORANGE GROVE TRL 2766 INLET COVE LN W 2560 8TH AVE SE 3701 REGENT BLVD #200 2980 ORANGE GROVE TRL 2935 ORANGE GROVE TRL 2821 INLET COVE LN W 3051 ORANGE GROVE TRL 2845 INLET COVE LN W 2876BLOSSOM COURT UTFD 08/07/03 515 LOGAN BLVD S 809 WALKERBILT RD STE 7 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7528 NAPLES, FL 34109 --- 0 JACKSONVILLE, FL 32207 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1341 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7569 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7534 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 MONTICELLO, IN 47960--- 7135 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34109 --- 0 MIAMI, FL 33176--- 2734 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7494 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 GREENVILLE, SC 29615 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1336 NAPLES, FL 34108 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34113--- 8330 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 7528 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7559 NAPLES, FL 34119 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7450 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7450 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34114--- 7917 HOWARD BEACH, NY 11414--- 2927 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34117 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 7569 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 7528 IRVING, TX 75063 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7449 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 7528 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1448 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7543 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 7569 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7497 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7548 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7513 BAY CITY, M 148706 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7450 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1494 NAPLES, FL 34114 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1319 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7507 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7450 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34119 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1326 NAPLES, FL 34109 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7450 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7450 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7538 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1448 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 4318 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7538 NAPLES, FL 34103--- 2466 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1338 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1494 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7507 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7569 NAPLES, FL 34119--- 2805 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1319 SCOTTSDALE, AZ 85261 --- 0 LAKELAND, FL 33802 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34119--- 8577 NAPLES, FL 34119--- 8577 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1832 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34110 --- 0 VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 7-A GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 23 TR 53 GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 22 TR 97 GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 22 N 300 GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 22 S GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 22 N VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 7-A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 5-A GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 22 S VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 2A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 1-A GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 22 S GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 22 S 165 VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 2A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 5-A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 7-A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 1-A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 2A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 5-A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 1-A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 2A GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 22 TR GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 22 S 112 VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 5-A ORANGE TREE UNIT TWO VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 7-A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 7-A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 5-A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 1-A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 1-A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 7-A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 5-A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 7-A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 5-A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 7-A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 2A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 5-A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 7-A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 7-A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 7-A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 1-A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 7-A ORANGE TREE UNIT TWO VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 5-A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 7-A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 1-A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 5-A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 1-A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 2A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 7-A GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 22 N VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 1-A LAKE LUCERNE LOT 18 NEIGHBORHOOD SHOPPES GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 22 S VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 2A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 7-A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 1-A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 1-A GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 22 S GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 22 S GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 22 N1/2 VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 1-A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 1-A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 7-A ORANGE TREE UNIT TWO LAKE LUCERNE LOT 17 GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 22 N VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 7-A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 7-A GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 23 E1/2 VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 7-A GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 22 S VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 7-A LAKE LUCERNE LOT 21 VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 2A LAKE LUCERNE LOT 20 VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 2A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 7-A GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 22 TR GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 22 N LAKE LUCERNE LOT 19 NEIGHBORHOOD SHOPPES GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 22 TR 94, GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 22 TR 95 GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 22 S 1/2 VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 7-A GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 23 E LOT 41 LESS THAT PORTION FOR R/W DESC IN OR 3100 PG 2577 FT OF TR 94 OR 1750 PG 2181 150FT OF TR 90 OR 1630 PG 1722 180FT OF TR 88 OR 830 PG 353 LOT 23 LOT 21 180FT OF TR 102 AND THE N 180 BLK F LOT 1 BLK A LOT 4 150FT OF TR 116 OR 1391 PG FT OF TR 121 LESS THAT PORTION BLK F LOT 6 LOT 36 LOT 24 BLK D LOT 3 BLK F LOT 8 LOT 26 BLK D LOT 6 BLK D LOT 25 103 AND THE S 180FT TR 104 OF TR 87 LOT 37 CITRUS GREENS SECTION PH 4-A LOT 39 LOT 30 LOT 19 BLK E LOT 3 BLK E LOT 4 LOT 4 LOT 39 LOT 2 LOT 25 LOT 12 BLK F LOT 10 LOT 40 LOT 17 LOT 38 LOT 18 BLK A LOT 2 LOT 33 CITRUS GREENS SECTION PH 4-A LOT 34 LOT 19 BLK C LOT 1, LESS THAT PORTION LOT 18 BLK E LOT 8 BLK D LOT 26 LOT 49 150FT OF TR 96 BLK E LOT 9 AT ORANGETREE TRACT 1 180FT OF TR 98 OR 1171 PG 814 BLK D LOT 19 LOT 22 BLK E LOT 5 BLK C LOT 2, AND THAT PORTION 150FT OF TR 114 OR 1832 PG 914 150FT OF TR 88 OF TR 115 BLK E LOT 6 BLK E LOT 2 LOT 52 CITRUS GREENS SECTION PH 4-A 180FT OF TR 90 LOT 16 LOT 57 OF TR 54 LESS THAT PORTION FOR LOT 43 150FT OF TR 105 OR 1954 PG 999 LOT 46 BLK F LOT 7 BLK D LOT 22 LOT 21 100 150FT OF TR 98 AT ORANGETREE TRACT 2 REPLAT LESS N 300 FT AND LESS THAT LESS THAT PORTION FOR R/W AS OF TR 85 LOT 7 150FT OF TR 90 FT OF TR 101 1945 FOR R/W AS DESC IN OR 3111 PG 485. LOT 2 LOT 5 DESC IN 2777 PG 2543 OF LOT 1 DESC IN OR 2777 PG 2543 LOT 4 R/W AS DESC IN OR 3111 PG 0500 TRACT 2 PORTION FOR R/W DESC IN OR DESC IN OR 3111 PG 0500 3111 PG 0500 78698110402 U 37744000009 U 37697000004 U 37696840003 U 37696680001 U 37696520006 U 78698110046 U 78698106461 U 37697320001 U 78698004945 U 78698000101 U 37698320000 U 37698580002 U 78698005041 U 78698106762 U 78698110062 U 78698000525 U 78698005083 U 78698106568 U 78698000583 U 78698004725 U 37697400002 U 37696460001 U 78698106788 U 64697500205 U 78698110363 U 78698110185 U 78698106429 U 78698000680 U 78698000703 U 78698109662 U 78698106827 U 78698109620 U 78698106542 U 78698109824 U 78698005122 U 78698106843 U 78698109921 U 78698110347 U 78698109947 U 78698000062 U 78698110240 U 64697500506 U 78698106720 U 78698109963 U 78698000402 U 78698106403 U 78698000787 U 78698004741 U 78698110567 U 37696960006 U 78698000800 U 53360000467 U 63810090027 U 37697040006 U 78698004602 U 78698110020 U 78698000729 U 78698000428 U 37698120006 U 37696480007 U 37698240009 U 78698000745 U 78698000664 U 78698110622 U 64697500409 U 53360000441 U 37696640009 U 78698109905 U 78698110729 U 37744040001 U 78698110444 U 37697520005 U 78698110509 U 53360000522 U 78698005067 U 53360000506 U 78698004660 U 78698110004 U 37697200008 U 37697080008 U 53360000483 U 63810090124 U 37696860009 U 37696880005 U 37696320002 U 78698109727 U 37746800003 U POList 1000 PL20190002355-PL20190002356.xis RANDALL BOULEVARD LAND TRUST RANDALL BOULEVARD LAND TRUST RANDALL BOULEVARD LAND TRUST RANDALL BOULEVARD LAND TRUST RANDALL BOULEVARD TRUST RESTREPO, LUIS RESTREPO, MARIA DEL CARMEN E RIMMER, MARCUS B & SONYIA RISING, BLAKE RIVERA, JAMES & MARIA ROBERTO BOLLT TR ROBERTO BOLLT TR ROBERTO BOLLT TR RODRIGUEZ, ERIC DAVID ROJAS, OCTAVIO L & CARIDAD M ROTONDO, RAFFAELE & KRISTY M SEPANSKI, THOMAS GERARD SHELDON, EVELYN S SIROK, MARK JASEN & AAMIEE N SLETTEN, PAUL A & NICOLE J SMITH, ELTON G & DOLORES J SMITH, MICHAEL & SHARRON SOLIS, FRANKLIN JESUS CHAVEZ STARK, NATALIE A STRONG, BRANDON L & SARAH SWANSON, CARTER & LANA TALARICO, JEFFREY SCOTT THEMEL, JOHN W TORRES, CARLOS G TORRES, JORGE TRAN,HENRY TRUBIANO, ROBERT & ANNA C UCCI, MICHAEL G UNSWORTH, PAUL J & HEATHER J URIKA OIL INC URIKA OIL INC VALDEZ, DAVID A VALENCIA LAKES AT ORANGETREE VALENCIA LAKES AT ORANGETREE VALENCIA LAKES AT ORANGETREE VALENCIA LAKES AT ORANGETREE VALENCIA LAKES AT ORANGETREE VALLE, MARTHA L VCC PROPERTIES LLC VEGA, MARVIN & JOANNE VERBEL,JENNIFER WALLACE, JULIE WALTERS SCOTT A & DEBRA L WARREN, BETTY WHEELER, JOHN H & THELMA A WILLIAMS, MILDRED & PETER C WU, MAN WEI KALB, JUAN & ANTJE SERRA, GUERINO & ANGELA THOMAS, DAVID W THOMAS, DAVID W XU INVESTMENTS LP XU, ZHONG %ANDREW DICKMAN LAW FIRM %ANDREW DICKMAN LAW FIRM 809 WALKERBILT RD STE 7 809 WALKERBILT RD STE 7 %ANDREW DICKMAN LAW FIRM 2889 INLET COVE LN W JUAN CARLOS RESTREPO 2879 BLOSSOM CT 2970 ORANGE GROVE TRL 2867 ORANGE GROVE TRL PO BOX 855 PO BOX 855 PO BOX 855 MARIA BELEN ECHEVERRIA MELLO 363 25TH AVE NE 2829 INLET COVE LN W THOMAS GERARD SEPANSKI II JANET G MENDELSOHN 2773 INLET COVE LN W 3020 ORANGE GROVE TRAIL 2278 GROVE DR 2793 INLET COVE LN W MARIELLA ELIANA FLORES 204 SOUTH PAFFRATH 2900 ORANGE GROVE TRL 2853 INLET COVE LN W LYNN MARIE TALARICO 2910 4TH ST NE ANA KOCH CHRISTINE CASIERI TORRES VAN LAM DUSTIN EARL MILLERD MCDONALD 2924 ORANGE GROVE TRAIL 2888 BLOSSOM CT 384 RANDALL BLVD 384 RANDALL BLVD UNIT 3 VICTORIA HAYDEE VALDEZ HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION INC HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION INC HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION INC HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION INC HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION INC MARTHA R HERRERA 4085 TAMIAMI TRAIL NORTH 2925 INLET COVE LN E 2882 INLET COVE LN W 2919 ORANGE GROVE TRL 2933 INLET COVE LN E 2929 INLET COVE LN E 2761 4TH ST NE 2869 INLET COVE LN W 2877 INLET COVE LN W APARTADO AEREO 500 4575 RAY ROAD 5406 BLOOMINGTON RD 9 CAIRO CT 118 CHANCERY CRESENT TING LAN ZHU 809 WALKERBILT RD STE 7 809 WALKERBILT RD STE 7 809 WALKERBILT RD STE 7 2870 INLET COVE LANE W 2875 ORANGE GROVE TRAIL 4269 ENTERPRISE AVE 24D EDINBURGH DR 2796 BERGAMOT LN 2810 INLET COVE LN W 2777 INLET COVE LN W 2806 INLET COVE LN W 2800 BERGAMOT LANE 2789 INLET COVE LN W 2855 BLOSSSOM CT % VISION ASSOC MTG % VISION ASSOC MTG % VISION ASSOC MTG % VISION ASSOC MTG % VISION ASSOC MTG RODOLFO HERRERA SUITE B105 118 CHANCERY CRESCENT 11691 GATEWAY BLVD # 203 11691 GATEWAY BLVD # 203 11691 GATEWAY BLVD # 203 11691 GATEWAY BLVD # 203 11691 GATEWAY BLVD # 203 2730 2ND ST NE NAPLES, FL 34110 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34110 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34110 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34110 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34110 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7449 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7514 BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34133 --- 0 BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34133 --- 0 BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34133 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1342 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34104 --- 0 MONROE TOWNSHIP, NJ 08831 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7548 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7496 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7550 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 SPRINGFIELD, MN 56087 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7510 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7569 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7559 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7548 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7559 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7548 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7528 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 3325 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 3325 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 FT MYERS, FL 33913 --- 0 FT MYERS, FL 33913 --- 0 FT MYERS, FL 33913 --- 0 FT MYERS, FL 33913 --- 0 FT MYERS, FL 33913 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1328 NAPLES, FL 34103 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7507 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7507 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 1850 NAPLES, FL 34120--- 7569 NAPLES, FL 34120 --- 7569 MEDELLIN COLOMBIA MAIDSDONE NOR 1KO CANADA STOUFFVILLE L4A7X3 CANADA STOUFFVILLE L4A1N9 CANADA OTTAWA K4A4N3 CANADA ORLEANS K4A4N3 CANADA GGEACA PO Box 990596 Naples, FL 34116 GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 23 GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 23 GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 23 E GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 23 W GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 23 W VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 7-A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 7-A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 7-A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 1-A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 2A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 2A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 2A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 2A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 2A GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 22 S VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 7-A GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 22 S GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 22 N VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 5-A ORANGE TREE UNIT TWO VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 1-A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 5-A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 5-A GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 22 TR 93 VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 2A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 7-A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 5-A GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 22 S1/2 VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 5-A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 5-A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 5-A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 5-A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 1-A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 7-A GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 23 TR 71 GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 23 THAT VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 7-A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 5-A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 5-A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 7-A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 7-A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 7-A GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 22 N 1/2 VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 7-A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 2A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 7-A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 1-A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 2A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 2A GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 22 S VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 7-A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 7-A GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 22 TR VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 2A GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 22 N GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 22 S VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 7-A VALENCIA LAKES PHASE 5-A E1/2 OF TR 107 W 1/2 OF TR 107 180FT OF TR 89 150FT OF TR 89 180FT OF TR 90 LOT 5 LOT 51 LOT 35 BLK A LOT 3 BLK F LOT 11 TRACT A TRACT D TRACT E BLK F LOT 9 180FT OF TR 96 LOT 20 180FT OF TR 89 OR 1497 PG 47 150FT OF TR 89 LOT 16 CITRUS GREENS SECTION PH 4-A BLK A LOT 7 LOT 24 LOT 22 LESS THAT PORTION FOR R/W DESC BLK D LOT 23 LOT 14 LOT 31 OF TR 115 OR 1673 PG 1128 LOT 17 LOT 32 LOT 23 LOT 20 BLK D LOT 7 LOT 40 LESS THAT PORTION DESC IN OR PORTION OF TR 71 AS DESC IN OR LOT 31 TRACT A TRACT B TRACT A TRACT B TRACT C OF TR 87 LOT 42 BLK D LOT 11 LOT 54 BLK E LOT 12 BLK D LOT 13 BLK D LOT 12 150FT OF TR 101 OR 1703 PG LOT 10 LOT 8 117 OR 601 PG 1040 BLK F LOT 4 180FT OF TR 99 150FT OF TR 99 OR 713 PG 787 LOT 28 LOT 35 LOT 3 IN OR 3092 PG 2940 1659 PG 1510-12, OR 1616 PG 1854 PG 455-458 1964 312 37748480007 U 37748480104 U 37746720002 U 37746760004 U 37746840005 U 78698109688 U 78698110606 U 78698110282 U 78698000088 U 78698005148 U 78698004026 U 78698004084 U 78698004107 U 78698005106 U 37696920004 U 78698109989 U 37696560008 U 37696600007 U 78698106364 U 64697500302 U 78698000169 U 78698106526 U 78698106487 U 37696800001 U 78698004686 U 78698109866 U 78698106665 U 37698280001 U 78698106380 U 78698106681 U 78698106500 U 78698106445 U 78698000606 U 78698110389 U 37745120001 U 37745180009 U 78698110208 U 78698106021 U 78698106047 U 78698109523 U 78698109549 U 78698109565 U 37696440005 U 78698110428 U 78698004440 U 78698110664 U 78698000868 U 78698004482 U 78698004466 U 37697240000 U 78698109785 U 78698109743 U 37698400001 F 78698005009 F 37697160009 F 37697120007 F 78698110143 F 78698106746 F POList 1000 PL20190002355-PL20190002356.xis NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING Petitions PL20190002355 Immokalee Road/4th Street N.E. Mixed Use Subdistrict (GMPA) and PL20190002356, Randall Curve MPUD Rezone (PUDZ) ANeighborhood Information Meeting hosted by D. Wayne Arnold,AICP, of Q. Grady Minor and Associates, P.A. and Richard D. Yovanovich, Esq. of Coleman, Yovanovich & Koester, P.A., representing Richard D. Yovanovich as Successor Trustee (Applicant) will be held on Wednesday, December 9, 2020, 5:30 pm at North Collier Regional Park Exhibit Hall - Room A, 15000 Livingston Road, Naples 34109. Individuals who would like to participate remotely or have questions or comments should contact Sharon Umpenhour, Senior Planning Technician with Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. by email: sumpenhour@gradyminor.com, phone: 239-947-1144, or mail: 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, FL 34134. Project information is posted online at www.gradyminor.com/planning. Richard D. Yovanovich as Successor Trustee has submitted formal applications to Collier County, seeking approval of a Growth Management Plan (GMP) Amendment and a Planned Unit Development (PUD) Rezone. The GMP amendment proposes to amend the Golden Gate Area Master Plan, Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub -Element to establish the Immokalee Road/4th Street N.E. Mixed Use Subdistrict. The new subdistrict will provide for a variety of retail, office, personal service and residential land uses to allow a maximum of 150,000 square feet of nonresidential uses and a maximum of 400 residential dwelling units. The companion PUD rezone proposes to rezone the property from E, Estates to the Randall Curve Mixed Use Planned Development (MPUD) to allow development of the property with the retail, office, personal service and a variety of residential land use types. Access to the property will be via Immokalee Road and a vehicular interconnection with the property located immediately north of the subdistrict. The subject property is comprised of 50.18± acres located on the northeast corner of Immokalee Road and 4th Street N.E. in Section 22, Township 48 South, Range 27 East, Collier County, Florida. The Neighborhood Information Meeting is for informational purposes, it is not a public hearing. NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING Petitions PL20190002353 Estates Shopping Center Subdistrict (GMPA) and PL20190002354, Estates Shopping Center CPUD Amendment (PUDA) December 9, 2020 PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY ***P�e:ise he RoVv Sed*** The information on this sheet is to contact you regarding this project and future public meetings. Under Florida law, e-mail addresses, phone numbers and certain home addresses are public records once received by a government agency. If you do not want your e-mail address, phone number or home address released if the county receives a public records request, you can refrain from including such information on this sheet. You have the option of checking with the county staff on your own to obtain updates on the project as well as checking the county Web site for additional information. NAME: EMAIL:, ADDRESS:�4Q z a:::-- PHONE: NAME:- . 11. _ 1 I 1/ „ EMAIL: , A 1 _ _ I - t t SLAtl I 1 1 -1) P__I . I -1 V ••w1 I J1 i 1 v -L V� ADDRESS: '-�)gqc) S-r &'E PHONE: NAME: AVS I �LN EMAIL: + O ADDRESS-1 r \ �� PHONE: NAME: EMAIL: { ,_ ADDRESS: PHONE: NAME: fIU ?h/N' W ` [ -- EMAIL: ADDRESS: I jf �3i-6 S4- NG4i PHONE: 9--A gSa zjl6df NAME: EMAIL: ADDRESS: . -3 J �J T N W PHONE: f TV NAME: OA1�/r4 ��E C,SAY S EMAIL:ra_�5-e,v,rA,,�5 ADDRESS: � G PHONE: D NAME: EMAIL: ADDRESS: PHONE: NIM Sign -in Sheet 12-09-2020 NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING Petitions PL20190002355 Immokalee Road/4th Street N.E. Mixed Use Subdistrict (GMPA) and PL20190002356, Randall Curve MPUD Rezone (PUDZ) December 9, 2020 PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY ***1>Le51Se be advGSO*** The information on this sheet is to contact you regarding this project and future public meetings. Under Florida law, e-mail addresses, phone numbers and certain home addresses are public records once received by a government agency. If you do not want your e-mail address, phone number or home address released if the county receives a public records request, you can refrain from including such information on this sheet. You have the option of checking with the county staff on your own to obtain updates on the project as well as checking the county Web site for additional information. NAME: EMAIL: _ VW ADDRESS: PHONE: VV.,�JGI NAME: � � EMAIL: ADDRESS: ' PHONE: �,17 �. � 6 NAME: )6,, k < 1 5 &-Y7 EMAIL: ADDRESS: PHONE:2N-2_ 90 rt & q s �p �E(-dlk\ NAME: 2)A V (D jt` A L_B4 72`7' EMAIU f 7 O b °Q [16 IVM ADDRESS: 51B/ PHONE:Cf �"� S-D Z. NAME: �� �� EMAIL: ADDRESS: 21__191�v A), r�S�( PHONE: Z�Z 'Z� Q a - ,,?2 NAME: r E �6uS EMAIL:/ , 0 r ADDRESS: �[� � f�/- l PHONE: NAME: N cke- eA ADDRESS: 4'�2n NAME: ',,,/ X/ A, EMAIL: Gn !yI �fi��zwSQ oaf I , C PHONE: 3c -r GO 0 —0"/P EMAIL: K%��L'���_y�Y`�� C_, ADDRESS: } } �s-1` PHONE: — NIM Sign -in Sheet 12-09-2020 Randall Curve MPUD and Estates Shopping Center December 9, 2020 NIM - Zoom Participants First Name Last Name Email Registration Time Approval Status Jill Rosenfeld jillfrosenfeld@gmail.com 12/9/202018:25 approved David Dlugolenski dd@sagestonepartners.com 12/9/2020 17:31 approved Adam Brown ab@sagestonepartners.com 12/9/2020 17:31 approved Quincy Jones tquincyjones@gmail.com 12/9/2020 17:31 approved Robert Anderson ander100@comcast.net 12/9/202017:28 approved Maggie Kemp mkemp@comcast.net 12/9/2020 17:06 approved Michele Vaughan michele@davisgroupga.com 12/9/2020 17:01 approved Jillian Shaw jillian@davisgroupga.com 12/9/2020 16:59 approved Collin Johnson Collin@coastal-it.com 12/9/2020 16:42 approved Ty Thrasher tythrasher@outlook.com 12/9/2020 16:01 approved Corby Schmidt Corby.Schmidt@colliercountyfl.gov 12/9/2020 14:03 approved Billy Chambers billy@davisgroupga.com 12/9/202012:06 approved Dawna Livingstone dpipersburg@rembrandtaccounting.com 12/9/202010:02 approved Tim Ross rossdesinc@aol.com 12/8/2020 23:22 approved Susan Ruesink suerruesink@yahoo.com 12/8/2020 18:04 approved Mike Dalbey Mtpd7904@gmail.com 12/8/2020 16:29 approved Peter Brake pbrake@cmcd.org 12/8/2020 16:19 approved Diane Lynch dtlynch@comcast.net 12/8/2020 16:08 approved Scott Baxter madpoodle@aol.com 12/7/2020 20:57 approved Mary Bachelor mabachelor@comcast.net 12/7/2020 20:04 approved hunter harrison hunter@davisgroupga.com 12/7/2020 19:54 approved Linnea Chasse linneachasse@yahoo.com 12/7/2020 15:55 approved christopher davis chris@davisgroupga.com 12/7/202015:11 approved Robert Crown bobbyacrown@me.com 12/7/2020 13:46 approved Richard Eckstein richardeckstein239@gmail.com 12/7/2020 13:30 approved Barbara Pezzuto Basha324@msn.com 12/7/2020 12:30 approved J K realestatesouthwestflorida@gmail.com 12/7/2020 12:25 approved aaron zwiefel azwief@gmail.com 12/7/2020 12:18 approved C Kaufman Clk_ny@yahoo.com 12/7/2020 12:17 approved Bryan Bo Bryanbo79@yahoo.com 11/26/2020 8:28 approved Anita Jenkins anita.jenkins@colliercountyfl.gov 11/24/2020 17:12 approved Sharon Umpenhour sumpenhour@hotmail.com 11/24/2020 16:00 cancelled by self Petitions: PL20190002355, Immokalee Road/4th Street N.E. Mixed Use Subdistrict and; PL20190002356, Randall Curve MPUD Rezone December 9, 2020 Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM) GradyMinor Project Team • Richard Yovanovich, as trustee and not individually - Applicant • Richard D. Yovanovich, Esq., Land Use Attorney - Coleman, Yovanovich & Koester, P.A. • D. Wayne Arnold, AICP, Professional Planner - Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. • Mark Minor, P.E., Professional Planner - Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. • James M. Banks, PE, Traffic Engineer - JMB Transportation Engineering, Inc. • Marco A. Espinar, Environmental Planning/Biologist - Collier Environmental Consultants, Inc. 2 Location Map i SUBJECT PROP€R ff 0011, 1 IF # f Fr rr r ` { I r k� + y ORANGE TREE BOULEVARD 0 - � i F' 1 I SUBJECT PROPERTY { i l r� f f - �r I - I J +l v y RANDALL BOULEVARD vr�N aor�o esxir 3 !�"0 riT�i-i ffa i mow+.. � •♦ - �• _ il� '��u .+ `• �`'i� � �_ - • . L Project Information Existing Future Land Use (FLU): Rural Golden Gate Estates, Estates Designation, Mixed Use District, Residential Estates Subdistrict Proposed FLU: Rural Golden Gate Estates, Estates Designation, Mixed Use District, Immokalee Road/4th Street N.E. Mixed Use Subdistrict Current Zoning: E, Estates Proposed Zoning: Randall Curve MPUD Project Acreage: 50.18+/- acres 5 Proposed Request • The proposed Golden Gate Area Master Plan, Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub - Element amendment proposes to establish the Immokalee Road/4th Street N.E. Mixed Use Subdistrict. • The proposed subdistrict will provide for a variety of retail, office, personal service and residential land uses. • Access to the property will be via Immokalee Road, 4th Street N.E. and a vehicular interconnection with the property located immediately north of the subdistrict. • The maximum non-residential square footage permitted is 150,000 square feet. The maximum allowable number of residential dwelling units will be 400. • Proposed rezone from E, Estates to Randall Curve MPUD. n Proposed MPUD Master Plan j ZOc ED:E,ESTATES I u ZONED: E, ESTATES USE: RESIDENTIAL ZONED: E, ESTATES USE: UXDEVELOPE❑ POTENTIAL INTERCONNECTION I E� 1+fJ I +JfI !+f 1 r ZONED: ORANGETREE PUD YgE D r� COMMERCIAL 20' iVME TYPE I TY LANDSCAPE DUFFER I I • A NRY RER EXERAL OCATION I I I 1 I j . J ■r ,� I !I ' 0©©� ZONED:❑RANGETREE PUD USE- RESIDENTIALZON 'T USE R ESTATES USE: RESIDENTIAL I• J��r��/ J ■ / I! , I I %' ©©©g 20'WIDE TYPE I TYLANDSCAPE J / J ZO'VYIDE TYPE % LEGEND - BUFFER ---------------_ B FER FLANDSCAPE ® DEVIATION L R RESIDENTIAL -------------- -- ✓ I C COMMERCIAL ZONED: E, ESTATES . USE: UNDES'ELDPED I /,gyp /i I r l 1 RESIDENTIAL j l I I� ZONED: ORANG ETREE PU❑ USE: COMMERCIAL � r r 0 i5n b7 ' SCALE: 1" = 300' RANDALL CURYE HPUD ®GradyNbuor a; ; E%HIBIT C um rye N®nv MASTER PLAN s,.a..�... .f.. e•.,e,w.o...od .�. :. REVISED: SEPTENBER I". 2020 , TOTAL SITE AREA: 50.18t ACRE COMMERCIAL (C) 17t AC (34%) RESIDENTIAL (R) 20.5t AC (41%) 4TH STREET N_E_ ROW 1.57t AC (3%) WATER MANAGEMENT 2.8t AC (6%) LANDSCAPE BUFFERS 1.71 t AC (3%) PRESERVE 6.6t AC (13%) RESIDENTIAL- MAXIMUM 400 DWELLING UNITS COMMERCIAL: MAXIMUM 150,000 S.F. OPEN SPACE: REQUIRED: 30% PROVIDED: 30% PRESERVE: REQUIRED: 6 6 ACRES (43.9t ACRES NATIVE VEGETATION X 0.15) PROVIDED: 6.6 ACRES DEVIATIONS [SEE EXHIBIT 0 LDC SECTION 5.05.04.D.1., -GROUP HOUSING- ® LDC SECTION 5.05.05.D.2.A., -FACILITIES WITH FUEL PUMPS" 91 LDC SECTION 5.05.05.D.2.13., -FACILITIES WITH FUEL PUMPS- ® LDC SECTION 5.05.05.B.1., -TABLE OF SITE DESIGN REQUIREMENTS- LDC SECTION 6.06.02.A.1., -SIDEWALKS, BIKE LANE AND PATHWAY REQUIREMENTS- 7 Conclusion Documents and information can be found online: • Gradyminor.com/Planning • Collier County GMD Public Portal: cvportal.colliergov.net/c/tyv/ewweb Next Steps • Hearing sign(s) posted on property advertising Planning Commission (CCPC) and Board of County Commissioner (BCC) hearing dates. • CCPC - TBD • BCC - TBD Contact: • Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A.: Sharon Umpenhour, Senior Planning Technician; sumpenhour@clradyminor.com or 239.947.1 144 extension 1249 • Collier County: PUDZ - Nancy Gundlach, AICP, Principal Planner, Nancy.Gundlach@colliercountyfl.gov or 239.252.2484 GMPA - Corby Schmidt, AICP, Principal Planner, Corby.Schmidt@colliercountyfl.gov or 239.252.2944 8 Estates Shopping Center GMPA and CPUDA (PL20190002353 and PL20190002354) and Immokalee Road/4th Street N.E. Mixed Use Subdistrict and Randall Curve MPUD (PL20190002355 and PL20190002356) 12-09-2020 NIM Richard Yovanovich: You all, we're gonna go ahead, and get started. My name is Rich Yovanovich, and I am the Attorney representing, Crown Management who is the current owner and developer of the neighbor — the Estates Shopping Center piece of property which is at the corner of Golden Gate Boulevard and Wilson Boulevard, and the purchase — the contract purchaser of the roughly 50-acre parcel of property that's at the Randall — Northside of — of Immokalee Road at the Randall Curve piece of property that's currently owned by the County. We're here tonight to do, the County required neighborhood information meeting that is part of the process for doing a growth management plan amendment and for a rezone of a parcel of property. We are — we are in the process of amending the current Estates Shopping Center growth management plan subdistrict, and the, PUD, planned unit development zoning district that is on that piece of property. And we'll go through in the details of what we're doing there. Related to those two petitions is a growth management plan amendment for the 50 acres owned by the County. The parcel will be rezoned to planned unit development well. A condition of our acquiring the property is the successful rezone of the County property and the successful rezone of the property currently known as the Estates Shopping Center. Therefore, if we are unsuccessful either of those, basically, the land will stay as it is currently zoned, uh. As part of the neighborhood information meeting process, we are recording the — we record the meeting. We are having some Zoom participants. So, I — I — I tend to pace. So, if I am— Sharon will bring me back in front of this camera, so there'll be Zoom participants. We're gonna — we're gonna go over both petitions, and then we're gonna open up for questions or comments. When you do speak if you come up to the microphone so we can catch the recording. Also, you're not required to, but the Planning Commissioners prefer if you would identify yourself for the record as you — you could be generic and say I'm a resident of Golden Gate Estates near the Estates Shopping Center or I'm a resident of Golden Gate Estates near the Randall Curve property if you don't want to say your name. But they — they want to know who's commenting and their relationship to the proposed project so they — they can better Page 1 of 21 Estates Shopping Center GMPA and CPUDA (PL20190002353 and PL20190002354) and Immokalee Road/4th Street N.E. Mixed Use Subdistrict and Randall Curve MPUD (PL20190002355 and PL20190002356) 12-09-2020 NIM understand the context of people's comments. We will try to always say for the record, Rich Yovanovich speaking, and Wayne Arnold will — will do the same for himself. Um, they just wanna know who's talking so they — they can get a better, understanding. We have — sorry — I want to introduce our team, and then we have some County Representatives here. Actually, when I initially spoke, I'm technically the Trustee that owns the property. I don't really own the property, but it's titled in my name, uh. So, I'm — I'm the Applicant on all of these petitions, uh. I'm also the Land Use Attorney on this. Wayne Arnold with GradyMinor is our Professional Planner. His boss is Sharon. He's been receiving all the correspondence with Sharon. If you have any questions, I'm sure your point of contact will be Sharon or Wayne. But if you have any questions after this meeting, you can contact either of them. Mark Minor's not here, but he's a Civil Engineer on the project. Jim Banks is our Transportation Consultant, and Marco Espinar is our Environmental Consultant. We didn't bring Marco into this meeting because I don't know that there are really any environmental issues related to either of the petitions. But if, you know, some questions come up, we'll get back to you on any of those — those questions. As I have — this is — this is the roughly, 60 acres that's the Estate — Sharon Umpenhour: Forty. Richard Yovanovich: Forty acres, sorry. The 40 acres that's the Estates Shopping Center property at the corner of Wilson Boulevard and Golden Gate Boulevard, and the top portion is the yellow. That's the roughly 50 acres that we have under contract with the County, uh. As I mentioned, they're — they're related petitions, and I've already forgotten to introduce Nancy Gundlach who is a Professional Planner on — which one are you? Which one's yours, Nancy? Nancy: I'm on the Randall Curve. Richard Yovanovich: She's — she's the planner for the Randall Curve property, and James Sabo is on Estates Shopping Center, and I think participating by Zoom is Corby Schmitt. Is he on the Zoom? Female Speaker: Yes, yes. Page 2 of 21 Estates Shopping Center GMPA and CPUDA (PL20190002353 and PL20190002354) and Immokalee Road/4th Street N.E. Mixed Use Subdistrict and Randall Curve MPUD (PL20190002355 and PL20190002356) 12-09-2020 NIM Wayne Arnold: And Anita Jenkins. Richard Yovanovich: He — he — who else? Anita Jenkins: And Anita Jenkins. Richard Yovanovich: And Anita Jenkins are both — they are — they are handling the growth management plan amendments, and Anita actually supervises both the, growth management plan staff which is Corby, and the planning staff which is, Nancy and James. If you have questions of any of the County Representatives, they're — they're — they're readily available. You know, I'm sure they have business cards, and if they don't, they'll give you their email addresses. And you can, you can contact them with any — any questions you may have, uh. We're pretty informal. Really what we wanna do is tell you what we have planned with the petitions and then we wanna get your input. We also have representatives from Shy Wolf, who is, gonna be involved in the Estates Shopping Center property. So, if questions come up regarding Shy Wolf, those questions can be answered. I'm gonna turn it over to Wayne to go over the two petitions, and then we'll answer any questions you may have. Wayne Arnold: Thank you, Rich. So, sure. Thank you. I'm Wayne Arnold as Rich said and here representing both petitions, and there are a total of four. They're, growth management plan amendment and a rezoning application — Wayne: — for both applications on both sides. So, what we're gonna do is go through as Rich said both applications together, and then we'll take questions. We just thought it'd be more efficient than to break and have questions and answers on one and then the other. So, hope you indulge us if you're here for one or the other as you're gonna hear a little bit about both because as Rich mentioned they are related. So, the property for the Estates Shopping Center which I'll go through first is zoned planned unit development. We're amending that planned unit development. It's also part of the Estates Shopping Center subdistrict which is growth management category. We're amending that as well. And it's — the — the easiest way to summarize our changes is that we are — it's not — we are —essentially the Estates Shopping Center was approved for 150,000 square feet of Page 3 of 21 Estates Shopping Center GMPA and CPUDA (PL20190002353 and PL20190002354) and Immokalee Road/4th Street N.E. Mixed Use Subdistrict and Randall Curve MPUD (PL20190002355 and PL20190002356) 12-09-2020 NIM commercial uses. It also required the first commercial use was going to be the grocery store. We are amending that request to reduce the commercial square footage to 50,000 square feet of general commercial type uses, and then we're also making provisions for government uses. A whole series of those governmental uses because Collier County will end up with a — a nominal, 10-acre parcel out of the 40-acre piece. And then we've made provisions for Shy Wolf and its educational programming and then sanctuary use to be on the Western -most parcel. So, we've had to amend the growth management plan language to accommodate those changes as well as our zoning, which lists a very detailed, uses. So, a couple things, we've created two new districts out of here, the commercial district is pretty self-evident. It's going to be right at the hard corner of Wilson and Golden Gate. But the Shy Wolf sanctuary parcel that we're calling it, we're calling it a semi-public use. And we're going back and forth with staff so we may change that terminology, but it allows things like we've talked about, animal shelters, arboreta, exhibitions, their educational facilities. We've made provisions for them to have single-family residential and dormitory use because they are an educational facility, and they're incorporation with Florida Gulf Coast or other universities that come and do some research on the animals. So, there will be provisions made for that residential component, that will probably initially utilize the single-family structures on the site for office space and some of the other uses that they have that eventually those, um, would be significantly modified, and they have a true education center established, and — and other structures. But for now, we've made provisions for them to have up to eight dwelling units on that property. The County's parcel which will be the — [inaudible] [00:09:121. Sorry about that, folks. It's a little slow, but the County's public uses, and I know there's information circulating out there in the Estates about this. So, in the — the growth management plan, then we've made a provision for a total of 50 dwelling units. We haven't been specific as to whether or not those are single-family or multi -family. The County asked us to make provisions for up to 30 units on the 10-acre parcel that they're obtaining as part of this deal. So, in addition to all the administrative, governmental type facilities Page 4 of 21 Estates Shopping Center GMPA and CPUDA (PL20190002353 and PL20190002354) and Immokalee Road/4th Street N.E. Mixed Use Subdistrict and Randall Curve MPUD (PL20190002355 and PL20190002356) 12-09-2020 NIM that we've listed here by standard industrial classification codes, we've also made provisions for there to be up to 30 multi -family units. The reality is because we have well and septic here, I don't think it's realistic that the County's going to achieve 30 multi -family units on this parcel. We were asked to accommodate that as part of the request; so, we have. I know that that's been some discussion out there about that, and we'll be happy to hear those comments. But, again, we've also made provisions for single-family on the same parcel because should this deal not go forward, Crown Management that would control it, would then have the option to continue to do single-family that's permitted by right today. So, it says in our language that the single-family would be subject to the state's zoning district standards. So, you get what you could have today. So, the master plan that was approved as part of this growth management plan is the exhibit that's on the screen. It identified all — a large development area and then areas for utility plant site as well as some lights and buffers. So, we are modifying that. The new subdistrict is, generic. This would be an exhibit to the growth management plan which you can see that we have three separate parcels identified as commercial, public, and semi-public. We depict the access points that we're providing for the project on the master plan as well. The zoning master plan is a little bit more detailed than we showed on the growth management plan exhibit. This again is being modified to take out some of the detail in the footprints that were shown as future buildings on there. It's going to be revised to be a little bit more generic, but again, the preserve buffer areas get depicted on here. The access aspects are depicted. And again, we've identified which parcels would be used for public, semi-public, or the commercial uses that are going to be retained. So, where we are in the process, we submitted a few months ago. We've been through a couple rounds of reviews. We're — we're required to hold this neighborhood information meeting prior to going to public hearings. So, we don't have public hearings scheduled yet. But what will happen in this process, it's a two-step process; we'll have a transmittal process with the growth management plan assuming that the Board endorses it. They will take both of these, and they'll say, "We're ready to transmit the proposed changes." Page 5 of 21 Estates Shopping Center GMPA and CPUDA (PL20190002353 and PL20190002354) and Immokalee Road/4th Street N.E. Mixed Use Subdistrict and Randall Curve MPUD (PL20190002355 and PL20190002356) 12-09-2020 NIM They'll go to the Department of Economic Opportunity, DEO at the State of Florida. The state gets 30 days to review those changes to determine if there are any state impacts or regional impacts, doubtful that they will weigh in on this, but it's a part of the process we have to go through. And then after that process, we would then come back in the PUD document, the zoning document would come together with the comp plan amendment. And the Planning Commission would again hear it together, and then that would then be heard by the Board of County Commissioners for final action. And our goal here is that all four of these applications will come together and be heard at the same Planning Commission and Board of County Commissioner meeting since they're interrelated. We think it makes more sense to be able to tell the whole story and deal with them in one — one time. So, that's our goal. We don't have hearing dates established yet, but our goal is to be through the process by June of 2021 which gets us there by — the Board takes a summer recess in July and August. So, our goal is to be completed in this process in June, no later than just next year. So, we think that's a doable process although we don't have hearing dates scheduled yet. The round of comments we got from staff were down to some fairly, I think, minor issues that are pretty easy to deal with. So, in a nutshell, that's — that's what we're hoping to achieve, and with that, I'm gonna wrap up this presentation. And, Sharon, if you can bring up the Randall Curve as we're calling it? It's really the County's property that's at the corner of Randall/4th Street Northeast and Immokalee Road. So, I'm gonna spend a few minutes talking about that process as well. Again, it's the same team so I'm not gonna through that information. Again, the location at — it's — everybody calls this the Randall Curve property that's been around a long time, so. We actually have a Randall Curve PUD that's part of the process, but our subdistrict for the comp plans that — for the mockup of 41h Street — 4th East subdistrict. Again, this property today is zoned the Estates. It does not have zoning on it that would allow the mixed -use project we're proposing. It's also part of the rural Golden Gate Estates. Comp plan does not make provisions for this to be a commercial mixed -use project that we're proposing. So, we've submitted, a new subdistrict that makes provisions for there to be up to 400 residential units on this property Page 6 of 21 Estates Shopping Center GMPA and CPUDA (PL20190002353 and PL20190002354) and Immokalee Road/4th Street N.E. Mixed Use Subdistrict and Randall Curve MPUD (PL20190002355 and PL20190002356) 12-09-2020 NIM as well as 150,000 square feet of commercial uses. I'm gonna show you the proposed master plan for the Randall — Sharon Umpenhour: Go back, go back one. There you go. Wayne: — though this is the language that talks about our request. And a couple significant things I'll talk about is that we've made provisions for a large variety of retail uses. I know that there have been several discussions with members of the Estates Civic Association and other, community residents that have talked about the need for services out in this part of the community. So, we've made a very broad list of uses that largely are C-4 type uses I would say of the maximum intensity. There could be a couple of others depending on how the County categorizes those that would be C-5 because we've made provisions for there to be potential large format retailer or big box store whether that could be a Lowe's, a Home Depot, a Costco. We've made provisions for all of those as part of our request. It doesn't mean that those are going to be necessarily located there, but we've made provisions for them. We also have provisions there for the other types of uses we know people desire which are restaurants and offices and dental offices and things of that nature. So, I would, you know, just to — to know that this is a mixed -use project, Sharon's there's something on my screen. It's — it's some sort of system update. I don't know how to remove that. Let's take a pause for a moment. Thank you. So, this is a proposed master plan that we've created for what's called the Randall Curve PUD. It's the — this makes use, we have designated areas that are preserve, residential and commercial. C stands for commercial; the R is for residential. Preserve is labeled as such. It is conceptual, but it identifies two primary access aspects on Immokalee Road. We also have a shared access point with the properties to the North that's going through a similar process that we're in today. They're a little bit ahead of us. They've had their transmittal of the comp plan portion of their property to the State of Florida. So, we're — we're on track to being a couple months behind them. But the residential is sorta central to the site. We have our preserve area that separates us from the 4th Street residential. We have water management system that we have, and we've proposed no vehicular Page 7 of 21 Estates Shopping Center GMPA and CPUDA (PL20190002353 and PL20190002354) and Immokalee Road/4th Street N.E. Mixed Use Subdistrict and Randall Curve MPUD (PL20190002355 and PL20190002356) 12-09-2020 NIM access to 41h Street Northeast. We would obviously make provisions for pedestrians and bicyclists to enter the site, but we prohibited vehicular traffic from accessing 41h. And we know that was an issue early on. When the County was looking at developing this themselves and we've heard that that's an issue, and we were asked on the property to the North also to remove any access to 4ffi Street which they have done as well. But you can see on this particular property that the uniqueness of this is when you go out there today, the — at the hard corner of 41h and Immokalee Road, that area's all the dry detention system for the County that was put in to satisfy the Immokalee Road widening project. So, that parcel is part of the acquisition. We have to take into consideration all of the drainage. So, we are going to have a larger system of either lake or dry detention to accommodate their five acres that they need today as well as the future improvements that they're planning to make on Randall Boulevard. We have to accommodate some of the additional drainage for them as well in addition to our drainage. So, that's been one of the unique challenges here, but nonetheless, we've accommodated. We can work around that, and we think this could be a very good, viable project. So, again, if we're in the same process that I just described for you for the other Estates property which was we're going to have the comp plan transmittal process. We going to have a PUD adoption at the same time that the comp plan would be adopted. And as Rich said, these are kinda bundle projects. One doesn't happen without the other with the way that this has been structured. Again, no hearing dates have been established, but we are working toward that same June deadline I just described. And hopefully, we can, be there, and like I said before, we're gonna take questions tonight. If you think of something after we leave here tonight, you'd like to communicate, Sharon has some cards at the back table. It's easier to email or call her for information. We're happy to share the presentation tonight with anybody who desires it. All the information's available on the County's website through CityView, or if you don't feel comfortable using that system, Sharon would be more than happy to provide any of the comp plan information as public record or any of the zoning information to you as well. Page 8 of 21 Estates Shopping Center GMPA and CPUDA (PL20190002353 and PL20190002354) and Immokalee Road/4th Street N.E. Mixed Use Subdistrict and Randall Curve MPUD (PL20190002355 and PL20190002356) 12-09-2020 NIM So, Rich, I don't know if I left anything out, but I'm — I'm happy to answer questions. I will say one thing that one of the changes we did make on Estates that I failed to mention, we did even though we reduced the intensity of commercial from 150,000 — 50,000 square feet, we did add back end -use that we didn't have previously, and those were medical offices. We made provisions for medical offices and veterinary clinics that were something that was, desired by some folks who've been interested in the Estates. So, we've added those uses, and we think they're pretty benign uses overall and probably things that anybody who lives in that part of the community would probably utilize. So, with that, I'm gonna stop, and we're gonna — do you wanna take the Zoom callers first, Rich? Richard Yovanovich: Let's take people that are here first, and then, yeah. Wayne: Do the audience, okay, so, anybody who'd like to speak as Rich mentioned, you don't have to give us your name if you don't feel comfortable, but the Planning Commission wants to know if you're part of our team's feed or if you're a resident. So, if you feel comfortable saying you're a resident that way at least when the transcript gets created, they realize it's not Wayne or Rich or Sharon or Jim talking, so. Anybody with questions, please, feel free to come up and use the microphone. We can sanitize it between its use, and —yes, ma'am. Come on up. Phyllis: Phyllis Lit — Phyllis Litka, the 2nd Street Northeast, um, all of this involves even though I live out that way on part of the curve, um, I'd like to know, the low-income housing that you wanna put in on 10 acres, that's like four of my neighbors, how are you going to put 30 units? And when you say low-income, what are we talking? Wayne: Well, that — the low-income reference is not a term we use. Our language says essential service personnel that's actually in the document, and — Phyllis: Okay, on — on my form, that's what it says [inaudible] [00:21:231. Wayne: — and I — I don't know that that's our letter that said affordable housing. Richard Yovanovich: Can I see that? Do you mind? Page 9 of 21 Estates Shopping Center GMPA and CPUDA (PL20190002353 and PL20190002354) and Immokalee Road/4th Street N.E. Mixed Use Subdistrict and Randall Curve MPUD (PL20190002355 and PL20190002356) 12-09-2020 NIM Phyllis: Sure, yeah, absolutely. Wayne: Our language says essential service personnel, and that's a term that the County's recently started using to refer to first responders, teachers, nurses, county employees, people like that, who are essential service personnel in our community that seem to be priced out — out of the housing market. Phyllis: Yeah, I can understand that. Wayne: As I mentioned before, the 30 units is the number that the County asked us to provide. If it's going to be multi -family housing, I — our — our opinion is just doesn't work because of the septic system requirements. Phyllis: Right. Wayne: So, I don't know that the County realistically is going to achieve 30 of those units in the — in the configuration of multi -family, but again, Rich, I don't know you wanna add any more. But we were asked to include it; so, we did. Richard Yovanovich: Yeah. I — a — as part of this process, obviously — yeah, you can sit right there. I'm sorry. As — as part of this process, obviously, we — we had to coordinate with the County because they're getting the 10 acres, and we — we basically said, "What would you like us to include on your property?" So, the County gave us their list of requested uses. I have been doing this for a while so I kinda figured when the County said they wanted to put 30 units on a 10-acre piece of property that basically can have four under the current state zoning, I thought that was, gonna meet some resistance from the residents of the Estates. And I said, "I'm happy to include it, but you need to be at the neighborhood information meeting to defend it." And, I don't think there's anybody here from the County to address that. I don't think Nancy or James are — are — are — they were not the people I spoke to, uh. So, the — the — Wayne is correct. What you received, eh — we are not proposing low-income housing. I don't know who sent that out. We are — we are proposing essential service personnel — the Page 10 of 21 Estates Shopping Center GMPA and CPUDA (PL20190002353 and PL20190002354) and Immokalee Road/4th Street N.E. Mixed Use Subdistrict and Randall Curve MPUD (PL20190002355 and PL20190002356) 12-09-2020 NIM County's proposing essential service personnel housing, which is exactly what Wayne says, firefighters, teachers. But the number of units and the request for that use came from Collier County, uh. I think Commissioner McDaniels was on his way to this meeting. I just texted him to find out where he is, but he's — he is on his way. If he doesn't make it here before we get gone, I'm sure he'll read the record. But I — I think there's others here who also, have concerns about that use. So, we will obviously communicate that to County staff and, will follow their direction whether to remove that, um, request or not. But obviously, I know that's — I knew that was gonna be an issue before I even submitted the document, so, with any more questions? Wayne: This is Wayne. Can I just read you the language that's actually in the PUD document under public use? It says, "Essential service personnel housing not to exceed 30 units subject to develop standards for RM-6 zoning which would be the land development code." So, that is what's in the actual document. There's also a provision for there to be multi -family units which was meant to implement that essential service personnel housing. But there are as Rich mentioned, there's also a provision in there for single-family homes which is what could be there on that [inaudible — crosstalk] [00:24:53]. Richard Yovanovich: Right, and — and Tim's okay. Tim and I had a conversation about this very issue twice, and — and I told him the reason we put single- family houses in there is if for some reason Shy Wolf does not close on their piece of property or the County decides they wanna develop it as the common state lots, we just wanted that as — as — as also an option. So, I mean, that clearly Tim would have an issue with that. I hope nobody else has an issue with that piece. Wayne: Thank you, any other comments, or questions? Tim: Tim Wallen, 111, 3rd Street Northwest, uh. We're adjacent to the 40-acre, uh. As you guys know, we've been involved with this for 12 years now. So, when we started talking with Bob and, Shy Wolf and about the swap of the property, it seemed like, it was something real good for everybody in the community, for both sides, um. Again, the multi -unit, it would have to be low-income because they're gonna be like 200 square feet if they put `em there. Um, you know, when we first started doing this, we discussed Page 11 of 21 Estates Shopping Center GMPA and CPUDA (PL20190002353 and PL20190002354) and Immokalee Road/4th Street N.E. Mixed Use Subdistrict and Randall Curve MPUD (PL20190002355 and PL20190002356) 12-09-2020 NIM services from the County whether it be post office, police substation, some, you know, tag agency. I know it's right across the street right now or some sorta County presence that — that's needed out here, not housing. Housing just seems really stupid. The intersection is already stressed. Anybody that comes from the East traveling West to go there in the — to go to work in the morning, it — it's already a nightmare trying to get through Wilson Boulevard. To put all those cars and all that right there is a huge problem, again, septic and water. I think everyone else is — everybody's probably pretty comfortable with, but, you know, for the record, the — the multi — the multi -housing is — is — is definitely a — a killer. Male Speaker: Okay. Male Speaker: You know, it's if — so I can just put it on the record, can I just get a show of hands how many people are opposed to putting that multi- family on that piece of property. Male Speaker: So, I'm just gonna count the number of — one, two, three — Female Speaker: All of us. Female Speaker: Eleven. Female Speaker: So, [inaudible — crosstalk]. Male Speaker: So, I would say, if there's I I — there's 11 people present, and I think every one of them are not related to our team or Shy Wolf. So, I would say that pretty much everybody, is opposed to that. I just wanna — I just wanna put that on the record. So, both whoever reads the transcript knows so you all don't have to come up and repeat yourselves. Or you're welcome to come up anytime you want, but I just wanted to save some people some effort. Any other questions, comments before we go to people on Zoom? Jeff Curl: Yeah, for the record, Jeff Curl, um. I live actually off Desoto, but I do traverse Wilson and Golden Gate Boulevard quite a bit. I'm just wondering if the County has any intentions of doing rotaries at Wilson/Golden Gate Boulevard. That seems to be there brand-new, um, FDOT experiment and then how you guys would see traffic West of this intersection, and this Page 12 of 21 Estates Shopping Center GMPA and CPUDA (PL20190002353 and PL20190002354) and Immokalee Road/4th Street N.E. Mixed Use Subdistrict and Randall Curve MPUD (PL20190002355 and PL20190002356) 12-09-2020 NIM may be more of a Jim question with maybe left turns, right turns coming out, signals expansions, turn lanes, and maybe a U-turn or two through the median. Um, I'm assuming you — you're gonna remember from your time out there, too, Jim, um, that to the previous gentleman's point that traffic through there at rush hour's an absolute nightmare. Jim Banks: Yeah, right now, the only traffic signal's — Jim: Well, my bill is still extra, but okay. Jeff: You didn't sanitize this [inaudible — crosstalk] [00:29:06]. Jim: Maybe I can step way back here. Jeff: I'm gonna get the COVID. Jim: so, anyhow, to answer Jeff's question, you know, obviously, the intersection at Wilson and Golden Gate is currently signalized — Jeff: Right. Jim: — there's not enough separation between the E-western-most boundary of the property which is on 3rd Street to have a traffic light at that location. So, we will not have another traffic light service development, but that is one of the reasons that the commercial is in the corner of that — of that intersection now. And the lower intense uses are further to the West which will — it's our interpretation will not warrant a traffic signal, at those — at those intersections. But, yes, when we're going to the site development phase, we're gonna have to look at extending some of those left -turn lanes to provide for U-turns and that type of thing, mostly for the commercial uses. So, there will be some upgrades there in that general vicinity to accommodate additional turning moves they're gonna — but I do wanna point out that what is being proposed today is actually gonna generate substantially less traffic than what was previously approved. So, with this application, traffic demands from this 40 acres is going to be substantially reduced versus if it's developed then with the 150,000. Jeff: So, this is gonna dovetail into our previous — Page 13 of 21 Estates Shopping Center GMPA and CPUDA (PL20190002353 and PL20190002354) and Immokalee Road/4th Street N.E. Mixed Use Subdistrict and Randall Curve MPUD (PL20190002355 and PL20190002356) 12-09-2020 NIM Sharon: Can you guys hold on a second? Um, Jeremy, the Zoom participants aren't able to hear Jim. [Crosstalk] Jim: Okay. Sharon: Go ahead. Jeff: So, that also brings back to your point about multi -family and increasing the density at that site with residential, I think that'd be another, you know, point raised when we [inaudible — crosstalk] [00:30:511. Jim: Well, I — I would submit to you that I don't think all the — all the uses that are being proposed could all fit on the 40 acres so some things gotta give. Jeff: Yeah, and I think I'm honed in on that essential service kind of the boondoggle that we keep talking about here tonight, um. Jeff: No, I just — the County's trending, eh — again, FDOT getting a pave - type deal with rotaries and things like that to — to push traffic through quickly, you're talking about two lights that are fairly close together, um. And so, yeah, perhaps they're gonna keep that sequencing with each directional rush hour push, morning and at night, but, uh. I didn't know if there were any preliminary discussions. Jim: As far as I know, they've got no plans to put a traffic circle there at that intersection. I don't even think they have the right of way to do it, um. Jeff: I wouldn't think with E's there on the corner either, but. Jim: Right, so, but not — my interpretation is we will not see a round- about at that intersection. Jeff: Okay. All right, thank you, gentlemen. Male Speaker: Thank you, Jeff. Wayne: So, I guess without moving — Page 14 of 21 Estates Shopping Center GMPA and CPUDA (PL20190002353 and PL20190002354) and Immokalee Road/4th Street N.E. Mixed Use Subdistrict and Randall Curve MPUD (PL20190002355 and PL20190002356) 12-09-2020 NIM Rich: Anybody else here that wants — yes, sir, come on up. Female Speaker: Wayne? Wayne: Yeah, I have sanitized the microphone [inaudible] getting COVID. Sharon: Sorry. I've already had it, so I don't have to worry about it. [Crosstalk] Dave: My name is, Dave Meffin, um, 127th Street Northwest, and, so, even though it's not right next to my neighborhood, it's pretty close. And, I just, you know, I — I agree with this gentleman down here, but, um. I just wanna know anybody in our neighborhood who would be in favor of that. I mean, if you can find 10 people, I'd be happy. Wayne: You're speaking about this essential service housing? Dave: Yes. Wayne: Okay. I — I think as Rich said, the show of hands was pretty unanimous that, those in attendance certainly aren't supportive — Dave: I mean, if we had more time, and we could, you know, word of mouth a little more, we could get a thousand people in here; a thousand hands would be up, so. Wayne: Well, I — I have a little experience on this use of property, and I know you can get a lot of people out, right, sir? So, I — we — you know, we understand that will communicate to the County the, uh — the, unanimous opposition for those who are here to — including that multi -family housing, and I'm sure from watching James write that down right now, so. I'm sure that will be communicated to the powers that be, the County. Anybody else, anybody else here who wants to come up and speak before we go to those on Zoom? Laura: Hi, my name is Laura, and I'm a resident of the Estates. And, okay, that 10 acres, I'm like, "Why not make it a park? Why not make it something fun? And if you need to add a post office to it, you know, 10 acres is a good size, but we don't really have enough free area out on the Estates for, you know, like kids' playgrounds, stuff like that. They have plenty of it in the city. And so, I'm like, "Forget about that. Put it on that little 4th Street there. Well, we don't wanna it there either, so, the essential service." So, I'm just wanna make Page 15 of 21 Estates Shopping Center GMPA and CPUDA (PL20190002353 and PL20190002354) and Immokalee Road/4th Street N.E. Mixed Use Subdistrict and Randall Curve MPUD (PL20190002355 and PL20190002356) 12-09-2020 NIM sure that my vote is no, and I'm just emphasizing that. Wayne: Okay, and just for you know to ma'am, this is Wayne Arnold for the record, but we include parks as one of the uses for the County parcel. It's just — Laura: Okay. Oh — so, who decides once — Wayne: The County Commission ultimately will decide what use it would be there, but I think it's pretty clear tonight the direction it's headed with regard to the housing. Laura: Okay, thank you. Wayne: Thank you. Richard Yovanovich: I wanted to make two points, one, Commissioner McDaniels just entered the room, uh. Comm'r McDaniels: How's everybody doing? Richard Yovanovich: And, just to recap, um, everybody in this room is opposed to essential service personnel housing, that 30 units on the County's parcel in the Estates. Male Speaker: At Wilson — at Wilson and the Boulevard? Richard Yovanovich: Yes, yes, yes. Comm'r McDaniels: So, noted. Richard Yovanovich: I just want — wanted to make sure you're aware of that. Female Speaker: We raised our hands. Richard Yovanovich: And — and it just — and it just — just kinda going back a little bit of history, you know, on the Estates Shopping Center parcel, that — that — the hard corner piece set between Pt and — and Wilson was formally a neighborhood center where commercial was supposed to go in the first place. So, we're kinda going back to pretty much the original plan of — of Golden Gate Estates, by going through this process. And with that, any more questions or comments before we go to Zoom, participants? Page 16 of 21 Estates Shopping Center GMPA and CPUDA (PL20190002353 and PL20190002354) and Immokalee Road/4th Street N.E. Mixed Use Subdistrict and Randall Curve MPUD (PL20190002355 and PL20190002356) 12-09-2020 NIM Wayne: Okay, going to Zoom, Sharon, you wanna go ahead and call names and see if we have any questions on Zoom if they raised their hand? Sharon: Um, if they speak, they can raise their hand; I can unmute them. Wayne: If you have a question or comment you'd like to make and you're on Zoom, if you'd raise your hand if you — if you know how to hit that icon, and then Sharon will unmute. And we will be happy to let the rest of the crowd hear what you have to say. Richard Yovanovich: All right. How many — how many Zoom participants? Wayne: The question is how many Zoom participants do we have? Sharon Umpenhour: Fourteen but two are County staff, um. Wayne: So, we have 14 total Zoom participants and two of which are County. Richard Yovanovich: Anybody raising their hand? Sharon Umpenhour: No, but if you wanna ask them if they just — if someone wants to ask a question to unmute and ask a question. Wayne: Okay, so — so if you have a question, do — can you unmute, and then we'll know that you do have a question? Sharon Umpenhour: It doesn't look like anyone has a question. Wayne: I — I don't — I don't see anybody raising their hand or unmuting. So, I take it that none of our Zoom participants at this moment have question or comment, so. Anybody else in the room, Mr. Wallen, do you have a question? Richard Yovanovich: Wayne? Wayne, do you wanna, see if everybody on the Zoom call is opposed to the 30 units as well? Is there a way to find that out? Sharon Umpenhour: Oh, Scott Baxter has his hand raised. Wayne: We have, Scott Baxter, you have your hand raised. Do you wanna unmute and ask your question or make your comment? Scott, I'm not hearing ya. It looks like you're still muted on our end. Sharon Umpenhour: You still — you have to unmute, Scott. There you go. Page 17 of 21 Estates Shopping Center GMPA and CPUDA (PL20190002353 and PL20190002354) and Immokalee Road/4th Street N.E. Mixed Use Subdistrict and Randall Curve MPUD (PL20190002355 and PL20190002356) 12-09-2020 NIM Wayne: There you are. Scott Baxter: — unmute, I'm not sure if it's working or not. Wayne: We hear ya. Scott: Okay. Um, I'm trying to — you know, you're talking about putting 30 units on 10 acres. So, to be generous, we're only gonna have three units per acre because then there will be no streets, no buffers, no sidewalks. Everybody that's [inaudible] [00:37:471. However, this property was promised as a park. Is that not in here? Male Speaker: It is not a park. Wayne: Today it is not a park. It is zoned for a commercial shopping center. Scott: I understand that. Is the property staying — I thought this property was promised to us as a park. Wayne: It — it — I'll let Rich address that for you. Richard Yovanovich: Yeah. For the record, Rich Yovanovich, actually, what — what the property exchange agreement says is we would give the County the 10 acres. The County would then decide what it wanted to put on the property, and obviously, a park is an option and other government services is an option. Wayne: To the list, the uses we got for this 10 acres came from Collier County. And this — the purpose of this meeting is for the community who — to give their input back to all of us about what we're asking for as part of this PUD. And I assume you're like the other members that are present that you oppose the multi -family option on that 10- acre piece. Is that correct? Scott? Richard Yovanovich: Scott, can you — move? Scott: [Audio cuts out] [00:39:05] — Male Speaker: Broke up. Male Speaker: Breaking up. Page 18 of 21 Estates Shopping Center GMPA and CPUDA (PL20190002353 and PL20190002354) and Immokalee Road/4th Street N.E. Mixed Use Subdistrict and Randall Curve MPUD (PL20190002355 and PL20190002356) 12-09-2020 NIM [Crosstalk] Female Speaker: He said he's opposed. Richard Yovanovich: Okay. Wayne: Scott? Any other comments, Scott, or should we — anybody else on Zoom? Male Speaker: Yes, an upgraded Wi-Fi. [Crosstalk] Wayne: try again one more time. You're still a little muddled. Anybody remember when you had antennas on your TV, and you had to smack it or stand like this? [Crosstalk] Is there anybody else on — on Zoom that — that wants to, um, speak? Sharon Umpenhour: Maggie Kemp. Richard Yovanovich: Maggie Kemp, it looks like. Wayne: Maggie Kemp, you're up. Maggie Kemp: Hi, I just wanted to also voice my opposition to putting in low- income housing on such a small space, seems like the County seems to be forgetting about the residents and the impact on the residents that are around these projects. Wayne: Okay, thank you. Anybody else wanna make any comments on Zoom? Richard Yovanovich: Susan Risner — Rissen. Wayne: Susan, you're up, Ruse — Rusing. Am I close? Sharon: No, she's not on. Richard Yovanovich: She's unmuted. Page 19 of 21 Estates Shopping Center GMPA and CPUDA (PL20190002353 and PL20190002354) and Immokalee Road/4th Street N.E. Mixed Use Subdistrict and Randall Curve MPUD (PL20190002355 and PL20190002356) 12-09-2020 NIM Wayne: She unmuted. I just didn't know if she wanted to speak or not. Sharon: She's not got audio. Rich: Okay. Wayne: Oh, okay. anybody else on Zoom? Okay, one more go -round in here, anybody else wanna say anything? Phyllis: It's me again, Phyllis Litka, question on the Curve. The 400 units, are those houses, or are those apartments? Wayne: They — they — they will be — we make — we'd make provisions for both, but it — it'll be a multi -family, more likely a multi -family product. Phyllis: Okay. Wayne: It could be condos. It could be apartments. We — we don't have that final decision yet. Phyllis: Okay. And when — next question, you said something about 41 `cause I live on 2"d, so, yeah, it's the next street. So, 4th, they will not be able to come through 4th where they were gonna make that street, you know, behind all of, um, the storefronts? Richard Yovanovich: The, yeah, for the record, Rich Yovanovich, we — we — we — in the Curve property, the 50 acres were talking about tonight, there is absolutely no access on 4th other than we will make provisions for bicyclists or pedestrians that are coming up and down 4th but no cars will have access. Phyllis: Well, one of the other meetings that I was going to — had gone to, they were going to make a road. Yeah, mm-hmm, mm-hmm. Richard Yovanovich: And that — that was I think Wayne was involved in that one. It was the property to the North, um. Wayne: No — they no longer have access. That project removed their — any access and it's prohibiting to have access to 4th Phyllis: Oh, thank you. Okay, that's why you should go to meetings. Wayne: We appreciate you coming. Page 20 of 21 Estates Shopping Center GMPA and CPUDA (PL20190002353 and PL20190002354) and Immokalee Road/4th Street N.E. Mixed Use Subdistrict and Randall Curve MPUD (PL20190002355 and PL20190002356) 12-09-2020 NIM Richard Yovanovich: Anybody else? Tim: I — I was just gonna — I was just curious who the two County people were. Wayne: Mr. Wallen, Tim, why don't you come forward? Sharon: You need to speak into the microphone, please. Richard Yovanovich: I'll say it for you. Mr. Wallen wanted to know who the two County people were on the phone, and it was — I think I said it earlier, Anita Jenkins who is, Zoning Director, and, Corby Schnitt who is the Growth Management Reviewer — Plan Reviewer for this project. Those are the two County. Yes? Sharon: Actually, it's Michelle Mosca for Anita. Richard Yovanovich: Okay, well, Michelle Mosca who, also is in Growth Management is sitting in for Anita Jenkins, and, she's been with the County for quite a while and is familiar with the comprehension plan. Anybody else? All right, well, we thank you for coming and I hope everybody enjoys their holiday season and stay safe. Thank you. [End of Audio] Duration: 44 minutes Page 21 of 21 (CHAPTER 8, COLLIER COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE FOR LAND DEVELOPMENT) A zoning sign(s) must be posted by the petitioner or the petitioner's agent on the parcel for a minimum of fifteen (15) calendar days in advance of the first public hearing and said sign(s) must be maintained by the petitioner or the petitioner's agent through the Board of County Commissioners Hearing. Below are general guidelines for signs, however these guidelines should not be construed to supersede any requirement of the LDC. For specific sign requirements, please refer to the Administrative Code, Chapter 8 E. The sign(s) must be erected in full view of the public, not more than five (5) feet from the nearest street right-of-way or easement. The sign(s) must be securely affixed by nails, staples, or other means to a wood frame or to a wood panel and then fastened securely to a post, or other structure. The sign may not be affixed to a tree or other foliage. The petitioner or the petitioner's agent must maintain the sign(s) in place, and readable condition until the requested action has been heard and a final decision rendered. If the sign(s) is destroyed, lost, or rendered unreadable, the petitioner or the petitioner's agent must replace the sign(s) NOTE: AFTER THE SIGN HAS BEEN POSTED, THIS AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE SHOULD BE RETURNED NO LATER THAN TEN (10) WORKING DAYS BEFORE THE FIRST HEARING DATE TO THE ASSIGNED PLANNER. AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER BEFORE THE UNDERSIGNED AUTHORITY, PERSONALLY APPEARED SHARON UMPENHOUR WHO ON OATH SAYS THAT HE/SHE HAS POSTED PROPER NOTICE AS REQUIRED BY SECTION 10.03.00 OF THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE ON THE PARCEL COVERED IN PETITION NUMBER(S) SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT OR AGENT 3800 Via Del Rey STREET OR P.O. BOX Sharon Umpenhour as Senior Planning Technician for Q. Bonita Springs, Florida 34110 Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. NAME (TYPED OR PRINTED) CITY, STATE ZIP STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF Lee The foregoing instrument was sworn to and subscribed before me this 10 day of March , 2021, by Sharon Umpenhour as Senior Planning Technician for O. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A., personally known to me er�e- pi Qeed as identifioatio„ and who did/did not take an oath. CABIN J. DWYER Signature of NotK Public W COMMISSION # GG 982367 EXPIRES: May 14, 2024 Bmf WThruWxyPubicUM wrilers Carin J. Dwyer Printed Name of Notary Public My Commission Expires: (Stamp with serial number) Rev. 3/4/2015