Agenda 04/13/2021 Item #16G6 (Ranking of RPS #20-7806)04/13/2021
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of Request for Professional Services
(“RPS”) No. 20-7806, “Airport Improvement Program (AIP) Professional Services for Airports
(FAA Funded),” and authorize staff to begin contract negotiations with the top ranked firms so that
proposed agreements may be brought back for the Board’s consideration at a subsequent meeting.
OBJECTIVE: To obtain approval for the selection committee’s ranking of consultants so that staff can
negotiate contracts pertaining to professional services to be used by the Airport Authority to facilitate
projects funded by Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) grants for the airport improvement program.
CONSIDERATIONS: This RPS seeks consultants who will enter into professional service contracts to
provide engineering services to the Airport Authority Division for airport design and engineering
projects. The eventual contracts that will be issued under this RPS will be used for professional services
on projects that are less than $500,000, and where the resulting construction value is under four -million
dollars. This solicitation is for projects that will be funded by grants from The Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA). Projects funded by Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) grants were
solicited separately. With the assistance of operating staff, the Procurement Services Division developed
a solicitation for these services consistent with Florida’s Consultant’s Competitive Negotiation Act,
Section 287.055, Florida Statutes (the “CCNA”).
On November 13, 2020 the Procurement Services Division released notices of Request for Professional
Services (RPS) #20-7806 “Airport Improvement Program (AIP) Professional Services for Airports (FAA
Funded).” The County notified thirty-two thousand five hundred forty (32,540) vendors.
The selection committee convened on February 19, 2021, as described in the solicitation documents, to
score and rank each proposal. Pursuant to the CCNA, the evaluation criteria included, ability of
professional personnel; past performance/references; project approach, willingness to meet time and
budget requirements; and recent, current, and projected workloads of the firm. A minimum of three
references were requested from clients of projects with a similar size for which the firm provided services
similar in scope and complexity within the past five years. After review of the proposals and
deliberation, the committee ranked the proposals as seen below.
The solicitation will be awarded by category due to grant restrictions. The firms were asked to rank the
categories in order of preference if proposing on multiple categories:
Category A: Aviation Planning Services - One hundred seventeen (117) viewed the bid information and
three (3) proposals were received by the due date. Staff determined all three firms to be responsive and
responsible. The selection committee scored each of the proposals and ranked the firms as listed below.
Company Name Final Ranking
Avcon, Inc 1
Atkins North American Inc 2
Infrastructure Consulting & Engineering PLLC 3
Staff recommends negotiations with the top ranked firm Avcon, Inc. for Category A.
Category B: Architectural/Engineering Design Services -One hundred seventeen (117) viewed the bid
information and five (5) proposals were received by the due date. Staff determined all five firms to be
responsive and responsible. The selection committee scored each of the proposals and ranked the firms as
16.G.6
Packet Pg. 1557
04/13/2021
listed below.
Company NameFinal Ranking
Hole Montes, Inc 1
Atkins North American Inc 2
Avcon, Inc. 3
Infrastructure Consulting & Engineering PLLC 4
EXP US Services Inc 5
Staff recommends negotiations with the top ranked firm Hole Montes, Inc. for Category B.
Category C: Construction Engineering and Inspection -One hundred seventeen (117) viewed the bid
information and eight (8) proposals were received by the due date. Staff determined all eight firms to be
responsive and responsible. The selection committee scored each of the proposals and ranked the firms as
listed below.
Company NameFinal Ranking
Hole Montes, Inc 1
Atkins North American Inc 2
Avcon, Inc. 3
EG Solutions 4
Infrastructure Consulting & Engineering PLLC 5
PSA Constructors, Inc dba PSA Management Inc 6
Tectonic Group International, LLC 7
EXP US Services Inc 8
The top ranked firm Hole Montes, Inc. has been recommended for award for Category B and cannot be
awarded two (2) categories due to the grant restrictions. Hole Montes, Inc. has pre-ranked a preference
for Category B as #1 and Category C as #2.
Accordingly, staff recommends negotiations with the second ranked firm Atkins North America Inc. for
Category C.
FISCAL IMPACT: The subsequent contract will be utilized as projects are identified and funded via
Airport Authority Operating Fund (495), Capital Fund (496), and/or Grant Funds (498) / (499).
GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: There is no growth management impact associated with this
executive summary.
LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: This item is approved as to form and legality and requires majority vote
for Board approval. -SAA
RECOMMENDATION: Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of RPS No. 20-
7806, “Airport Improvement Program (AIP) Professional Services for Airports (FAA Funded),” and
authorize staff to begin contract negotiations with the top ranked firms so that proposed agreements may
be brought back for the Board’s consideration at a subsequent meeting.
Prepared by: Andrew Bennett., Executive Manager-Interim, Airport Authority
16.G.6
Packet Pg. 1558
04/13/2021
ATTACHMENT(S)
1. 20-7806 NORA_esigned (flat) (PDF)
2. 20-7806 Final Ranking - Category A (PDF)
3. 20-7806 Final Ranking - Category B (PDF)
4. 20-7806 Final Ranking - Category C (PDF)
5. [Linked] 20-7806 Avcon Proposal (PDF)
6. [Linked] 20-7806 Hole Montes Proposal (PDF)
7. [Linked] 20-7806 Atkins Proposal (PDF)
8. 20-7806 Solicitation (PDF)
16.G.6
Packet Pg. 1559
04/13/2021
COLLIER COUNTY
Board of County Commissioners
Item Number: 16.G.6
Doc ID: 15298
Item Summary: Recommendation to approve the selection committee’s ranking of Request for
Professional Services (“RPS”) No. 20-7806, “Airport Improvement Program (AIP) Professional Services
for Airports (FAA Funded),” and authorize staff to begin contract negotiations with the top ranked firms
so that proposed agreements may be brought back for the Board’s consideration at a subsequent meeting.
Meeting Date: 04/13/2021
Prepared by:
Title: – Growth Management Operations Support
Name: Heather Meyer
03/11/2021 3:32 PM
Submitted by:
Title: Division Director - Operations Support – Growth Management Department
Name: Gene Shue
03/11/2021 3:32 PM
Approved By:
Review:
Procurement Services Opal Vann Level 1 Purchasing Gatekeeper Completed 03/11/2021 3:52 PM
Airport Authority Andrew Bennett Additional Reviewer Completed 03/11/2021 3:56 PM
Capital Project Planning, Impact Fees, and Program Management Rookmin Nauth Additional Reviewer Completed 03/12/2021 7:47 AM
Growth Management Department Jeanne Marcella Level 1 Reviewer Completed 03/12/2021 8:21 AM
Procurement Services Sandra Herrera Additional Reviewer Completed 03/12/2021 10:03 AM
Growth Management Department Gene Shue Additional Reviewer Completed 03/12/2021 10:23 AM
Procurement Services Evelyn Colon Additional Reviewer Completed 03/12/2021 1:55 PM
Growth Management Operations Support Christopher Johnson Additional Reviewer Completed 03/12/2021 3:04 PM
Growth Management Department Thaddeus Cohen Department Head Review Completed 03/16/2021 10:16 AM
Grants Erica Robinson Level 2 Grants Review Completed 03/16/2021 10:18 AM
Grants Carrie Kurutz Additional Reviewer Completed 03/16/2021 1:30 PM
County Attorney's Office Sally Ashkar Level 2 Attorney Review Completed 03/23/2021 4:03 PM
Office of Management and Budget Debra Windsor Level 3 OMB Gatekeeper Review Completed 03/23/2021 4:57 PM
Grants Therese Stanley Additional Reviewer Completed 03/24/2021 3:19 PM
County Attorney's Office Jeffrey A. Klatzkow Level 3 County Attorney's Office Review Completed 03/25/2021 10:46 AM
Office of Management and Budget Laura Zautcke Additional Reviewer Completed 04/01/2021 10:35 AM
16.G.6
Packet Pg. 1560
04/13/2021
Office of Management and Budget Susan Usher Additional Reviewer Completed 04/05/2021 11:07 AM
County Manager's Office Dan Rodriguez Level 4 County Manager Review Completed 04/06/2021 10:07 AM
Board of County Commissioners MaryJo Brock Meeting Pending 04/13/2021 9:00 AM
16.G.6
Packet Pg. 1561
Notice of Recommended Award
Solicitation:20-7806 Title:Airport Improvement Program (AIP) Professional Services for Airports (FAA Funded)
Due Date and Time:December 15th, 2020 at 3:00PM
Recommended Vendor(s) For Award:
On November 13th, 2020, the Procurement Services Division released Request for Professional Services (RPS) 20-
7806 Airport Improvement Program (AIP) Professional Services for Airports (FAA Funded) to thirty-two thousand
five hundred forty (32,540) vendors.
The solicitation will be awarded by per category due to grant restrictions.The firms were asked to rank the
categories in order of preference if proposing on multiple categories.
Utilized Local Vendor Preference: Yes No
Respondents for Category A:Aviation Planning Services
Company Name City County State Final Ranking Responsive/Responsible
Avcon,Inc.Naples Collier FL 1 YES/YES
Atkins North America,Inc.Tampa Hillsborough FL 2 YES/YES
Infrastructure Consulting &
Engineering PLLC Columbia Richland SC 3 YES/YES
Category A: Aviation Planning Services
One hundred seventeen (117) bid packages were viewed, and three (3) proposals were received by the
December 15th, 2021, deadline. All three (3) vendors were found to be responsive and responsible with minor
irregularities.
The Selection Committee convened on February 19th, 2021 as described in the solicitation documents, the
Committee scored the proposals, ranked the respondents based on the criteria outlined in the solicitation.
Staff recommends negotiations with the top ranked firm Avcon,Inc.
Contract Driven Purchase Order Driven
Respondents Category B: Architectural/Engineering Design Services
Company Name City County State Final Ranking Responsive/Responsible
Hole Montes,Inc.Naples Collier FL 1 YES/YES
Atkins North America,Inc.Tampa Hillsborough FL 2 YES/YES
Avcon,Inc.Orlando Orange FL 3 YES/YES
Infrastructure Consulting &
Engineering PLLC Columbia Richland SC 4 YES/YES
EXP US Services Inc. Fort Myers Lee FL 5 YES/YES
16.G.6.a
Packet Pg. 1562 Attachment: 20-7806 NORA_esigned (flat) (15298 : RFP 20-7806 Professional Services for Airports Rankings)
Category B: Architectural/Engineering Design Services
One hundred seventeen (117) bid packages were viewed, and five (5) proposals were received by the December
15th, 2021, deadline. All five (5) vendors were found to be responsive and responsible with minor irregularities.
The Selection Committee convened on February 19th, 2021 as described in the solicitation documents, the
Committee scored the proposals, ranked the respondents based on the criteria outlined in the solicitation.
Staff recommends negotiations with the top ranked firm Hole Montes,Inc.
Contract Driven Purchase Order Driven
Respondents Category C: Construction Engineering and Inspection
Company Name City County State Final
Ranking
Responsive/Responsible
Hole Montes,Inc.Naples Collier FL 1*YES/YES
Atkins North America,Inc.Tampa Hillsborough FL 2 YES/YES
Avcon,Inc.Orlando Orange FL 3 YES/YES
EG Solutions Lakewood Ranch Sarasota FL 4 YES/YES
Infrastructure Consulting &
Engineering PLLC Columbia Richland SC 5 YES/YES
PSA Constructors, Inc. dba
PSA Management Inc. Orlando Orange FL 6 YES/YES
Tectonic Group
International, LLC Pembroke Pines Broward FL 7 YES/YES
EXP US Services Inc. Fort Myers Lee FL 8 YES/YES
Category C: Construction Engineering and Inspection
One hundred seventeen (117) bid packages were viewed, and eight (8) proposals were received by the December
15th, 2021, deadline. All eight (8) vendors were found to be responsive and responsible with minor irregularities.
The Selection Committee convened on February 19th, 2021 as described in the solicitation documents, the
Committee scored the proposals, ranked the respondents based on the criteria outlined in the solicitation.
*The top ranked firm Hole Montes,Inc. has been recommended for award for Category B and cannot be awarded
two (2) categories due to the grant restrictions. Holes Montes, Inc., has pre-ranked a preference for Category B
as #1 and Category C as #2.
Staff recommends negotiations with the second ranked firm Atkins North America,Inc.
Contract Driven Purchase Order Driven
16.G.6.a
Packet Pg. 1563 Attachment: 20-7806 NORA_esigned (flat) (15298 : RFP 20-7806 Professional Services for Airports Rankings)
Required Signatures
Project Manager:
Procurement Strategist:
Procurement Services Director:
___________________________________________________
Sandra Herrera Date
16.G.6.a
Packet Pg. 1564 Attachment: 20-7806 NORA_esigned (flat) (15298 : RFP 20-7806 Professional Services for Airports Rankings)
Name of Firm Andrew
Bennett Heather Meyer Mark
McCleary Julio Castro Kate Whitson Total Scores
Selection
Committee
Final Rank
Avcon Inc.93 99 100 94 94 480.00 1
Atkins North American Inc.95 96 99 97 93 480.00 2
Infrastructure Consulting & Engineering PLLC 90 93 95 91 92 461.00 3
Procurement Professional
CATEGORY A - Aviation Planning Services
PATRICK BOYLE
Page 1 of 1
16.G.6.b
Packet Pg. 1565 Attachment: 20-7806 Final Ranking - Category A (15298 : RFP 20-7806 Professional Services for Airports
Name of Firm Andrew
Bennett Heather Meyer Mark
McCleary Julio Castro Kate Whitson Total Scores
Selection
Committee
Final Rank
Hole Montes, Inc.100 99 100 93 96 488.00 1
Atkins North American Inc.96 99 98 97 94 484.00 2
Avcon Inc.91 98 98 94 95 476.00 3
Infrastructure Consulting & Engineering PLLC 90 94 93 91 91 459.00 4
EXP US Services Inc.85 84 86 87 82 424.00 5
Procurement Professional
CATEGORY B - Architectural/Engineering Design Services
Patrick Boyle
Page 1 of 1
16.G.6.c
Packet Pg. 1566 Attachment: 20-7806 Final Ranking - Category B (15298 : RFP 20-7806 Professional Services for Airports
Name of Firm Andrew
Bennett Heather Meyer Mark
McCleary Julio Castro Kate Whitson Total Scores Selection Committee
Final Rank
Hole Montes, Inc.*99 98 96 92 96 481.00 1
Atkins North American Inc.97 99 93 91 96 476.00 2
Avcon Inc.91 96 98 94 93 472.00 3
EG Solutions 89 91 100 92 90 462.00 4
Infrastructure Consulting & Engineering PLLC 90 94 93 91 88 456.00 5
PSA Management Inc.89 86 94 76 90 435.00 6
Tectonic Group International, LLC 89 86 84 72 91 422.00 7
EXP US Services Inc.85 84 86 83 82 420.00 8
Procurement Professional
CATEGORY C - Architectural/Engineering Construction Engineering and Inspection
*The top ranked firm Hole Montes, Inc. has been recommended for award for Category B and cannot be awarded two (2) categories due to the grant restrictions. Holes Montes, Inc., has pre-ranked a preference for Category B as #1 and
Category C as #2.
Patrick Boyle
Page 1 of 1
16.G.6.d
Packet Pg. 1567 Attachment: 20-7806 Final Ranking - Category C (15298 : RFP 20-7806 Professional Services for Airports
COLLIER COUNTY
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
GRANT FUNDED REQUEST FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES (RPS)
In accordance with Florida Statute 287.055
Consultants’ Competitive Negotiation Act
FOR
Airport Improvement Program (AIP)
Professional Services for Airports
(FAA Funded)
RPS NO.: 20-7806
PATRICK BOYLE, PROCUREMENT STRATEGIST
PROCUREMENT SERVICES DIVISION
3295 TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST, BLDG C-2
NAPLES, FLORIDA 34112
TELEPHONE: (239) 252-6098
Patrick.Boyle@colliercountyfl.gov (Email)
This proposal solicitation document is prepared in a Microsoft Word format (rev 8/16/17). Any
alterations to this document made by the Consultant may be grounds for rejection of proposal,
cancellation of any subsequent award, or any other legal remedies available to the Collier County
Government.
16.G.6.h
Packet Pg. 1568 Attachment: 20-7806 Solicitation (15298 : RFP 20-7806 Professional Services for Airports Rankings)
SOLICITATION PUBLIC NOTICE
REQUEST FOR PROFESSINAL
SERVICES (RPS) NUMBER:
20-7706
PROJECT TITLE: Airport Improvement Program Professional Services for Airports
RPS OPENING DAY/DATE/TIME: December 15th, 2020 at 3:00PM
PLACE OF RPS OPENING: Procurement Services Division
3295 Tamiami Trail East, Bldg. C-2
Naples, FL 34112
All proposals shall be submitted online via the Collier County Procurement Services Division Online Bidding System:
https://www.bidsync.com/bidsync-cas/
INTRODUCTION
As requested by the Airport Authority Division (hereinafter, the “Division, Department or Sponsor”), the Collier County Board of
County Commissioners Procurement Services Division (hereinafter, “County”) has issued this Request for P rofessional Services
(hereinafter, “RPS”) with the intent of obtaining proposals from interested and qualified Consultants in accordance with the terms,
conditions and specifications stated or attached. The Consultant, at a minimum, must achieve the requirements of the Specifi cations
or Scope of Work stated.
BACKGROUND
The Collier County Board of County Commissioners, in compliance with Florida Statute 287.055, Consultants’ Competitive
Negotiation Act, is seeking proposals from qualified and experienced engineering firms to perform continuing professional ser vices
for the airports.
It is anticipated that the projects will be funded by Federal grants from the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) under its Airport
Improvement Program, State grants from the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) and/or by county (non-grant) matching
funds. This will require the Consultant to provide input and guidance to the Airport Authority about said programs and to ensure the
Airport Authority’s compliance with all applicable standards, advisory circulars and regulations of the FAA, State of Florida and
Collier County.
All work awarded under this contract will be for projects in which the estimated construction cost of each individual project does not
exceed $4 million, and professional services for each individual project does not exceed $500,000 or the maximum sum allowable by law
under Florida’s Consultants’ Competitive Negotiation Act, Section 287.055, Florida Statutes, as amended, whichever is greater, and agreed
upon by the parties. All work will be performed in accordance with industry standards and comply with applicable laws, and regulations.
TERM OF CONTRACT
County reserves the right to modify this scope during negotiations for budgetary reasons.
The contract term, if awards are made, is intended to be for one (1) three (3) year term with three (3) one (1) year renewal option at
the sole discretion of the County.
Prices shall remain firm for the term of the awarded contract.
Surcharges will not be accepted in conjunction with this award, and such charges should be incorporated into the pricing structure.
The County Manager, or designee, may, at his discretion, extend the Agreement under all of the terms and conditions contained in
this Agreement for up to one hundred eighty (180) days. The County Manager, or designee, shall give the Contractor written notice
of the County's intention to extend the Agreement term not less than ten (10) days prior to the end of the Agreement term the n in
effect.
16.G.6.h
Packet Pg. 1569 Attachment: 20-7806 Solicitation (15298 : RFP 20-7806 Professional Services for Airports Rankings)
DETAILED SCOPE OF WORK
In accordance with FAA Advisory Circular (AC) 150/5100-14E, Architectural, Engineering and Planning Consultant Services for
Airport Grant Projects, the scope of work for this solicitation is being divided into three categories. The first category involves
planning services. The second category involves professional services for the design/bidding of airport development projects and the
third category involves professional services for the construction administration/inspection of airport development projects. The
prospective firms may propose on all three (3) categories but will be awarded only one (1) category. Each prospective firm will rank
each category in order of preference, if proposing on multiple categories. Work orders will be assigned on an as-needed basis.
Category A – Aviation Planning Services
This category includes studies under the board headings of airport system and master planning, airport noise compatibility planning
and environmental assessments and related studies. These studies include, but are not limited to, the following activities:
1. Design study to establish the framework and detailed work program.
2. Airport data collection and facility inventories.
3. Aeronautical activity forecasts and demand/capacity analyses.
4. Facility requirements determination.
5. Airfield modeling for capacity and delay.
6. Airport layout and terminal area plan development.
7. Airport noise studies under 14 CFR Parts 150 and 161.
8. Compatible land-use planning in the vicinity of airports.
9. Airport site selection studies.
10. Airport development schedules and cost estimates.
11. Airport financial planning and benefit cost analysis.
12. Participation in public information and community involvement programs and/or public hearings relating
to airport development and planning projects.
13. Environmental Assessments (EA), Environmental Impact Statements (EIS), and other studies in
accordance with FAA Orders 5050.4 and 1050.1.
14. Preparation of or updating of the airport layout plan.
15. Airspace analysis.
16. GIS data collection, entry, and analysis and other electronic graphical/mapping efforts.
17. Project feasibility studies
Category B – Architectural/Engineering Design Services for Airport Development Projects
This category includes the basic A/E services normally required for airport development projects. It involves services gener ally
of an architectural, civil, geotechnical, structural, mechanical, and electrical engineering nature, which include, but are not limited
to:
Preliminary Phase.
This phase involves those activities required for defining the scope of a project and establishing preliminary
requirements. Some examples of activities within this phase of a project include, but are not limited to
1. Coordinating with the Sponsor on project scope requirements, finances, schedules, operational safety and
phasing considerations, site access and other pertinent matters.
2. As applicable, coordinating project with local FAA personnel and other interested stakeholders to identify
potential impacts to their operations.
3. Planning, procuring, and/or preparing necessary surveys, geotechnical engineering investigations, field
investigations, and architectural and engineering studies required for design considerations.
4. Developing design schematics, sketches, environmental and aesthetic considerations, project recommendations,
and preliminary layouts and cost estimates.
5. Preparing project design criteria and other bridging documents commonly used for alternative project delivery
methods such as design-build contracting.
Design Phase.
This phase includes all activities required to undertake and accomplish a full and complete project design. Examples
include, but are not limited to, those below:
1. Conducting and attending meetings and design conferences to obtain information and to coordinate or resolve
design matters.
16.G.6.h
Packet Pg. 1570 Attachment: 20-7806 Solicitation (15298 : RFP 20-7806 Professional Services for Airports Rankings)
2. Collecting engineering data and undertaking field investigations; performing geotechnical engineering studies;
and performing architectural, engineering, and special environmental studies.
3. Preparing necessary engineering reports and recommendations.
4. Preparing detailed plans, specifications, cost estimates, and design/construction schedules.
5. Preparing Construction Safety and Phasing Plan (CSPP).
6. Printing and providing necessary copies of engineering drawings and contract specifications.
Bidding and Negotiation Phase.
The firm shall be required to provide complete services as outlined in the contract or assist the Airport Authority, a t a
minimum, with the following tasks.
1. Provide final calculations, construction documents and specifications in consultation with the Owner.
2. Prepare and file all applications, data, and documents required to obtain approval of all authorities having
jurisdiction over the project.
3. Prepare the necessary bidding technical specifications and bid schedule(s).
4. Prepare a written cost estimate, engineering and functionality recommendations.
5. Additional services as may be necessary and appropriate.
Other Design Services.
The development of some projects may involve activities or studies outside the scope of the basic design services
routinely performed by the consultant. These special services may vary greatly in scope, complexity, and timing and
may involve a number of different disciplines and fields of expertise. Examples of special services that might be
employed for airport projects include, bu t are not limited to, the following:
1. Soil investigations, including core sampling, laboratory tests, related analyses, and reports.
2. Detailed mill, shop, and/or laboratory inspections of materials and equipment.
3. Land surveys and topographic maps.
4. Field and/or construction surveys.
5. Photogrammetry surveys.
6. Special environmental studies and analyses.
7. Public information and community involvement surveys, studies, and activities.
8. Assisting the Sponsor in the preparation of necessary applications for local, State , and Federal grants.
9. Preparation of property maps.
10. Preparation of quality control plan.
11. Other design services as needed.
Category C – Architectural/Engineering Construction Engineering Inspection Services for Airport Development Projects
This category includes the basic construction engineering inspection services normally required for airport development projects.
It may include all basic services rendered after the award of a construction co ntract, including, but not limited to, the following
activities:
1. Providing consultation and advice to the Sponsor during all phases of construction.
2. Representing the Sponsor at preconstruction conferences.
3. Inspecting work in progress periodically and providing appropriate reports to the Sponsor.
4. Reviewing and approving shop and erection drawings submitted by contractors for compliance with design
concept/drawings.
5. Reviewing, analyzing, and accepting laboratory and mill test reports of materials and equipme nt.
6. Assisting in the negotiation of change orders and supplemental agreements.
7. Observing or reviewing performance tests required by specifications.
8. Determining amounts owed to contractors and assisting Sponsors in the preparation of payment requests for
amounts reimbursable from grant projects.
9. Making final inspections and submitting punch-lists and a report of the completed project to the Sponsor.
10. Reviewing operations and maintenance manuals.
11. Making final inspections and submitting punch-lists and a report of the completed project to the Sponsor.
12. Providing record drawings.
13. Preparing summary of material testing report
14. Preparing summary of project change orders
15. Preparing grant amendment request and associated justification, if applicable.
16.G.6.h
Packet Pg. 1571 Attachment: 20-7806 Solicitation (15298 : RFP 20-7806 Professional Services for Airports Rankings)
16.Preparing final project reports including financial summary.
17.Obtaining release of liens from all contractors.
DISTRIBUTION OF WORK
As noted above, one (1) firm will be selected for each of the three (3) categories of work. Firms should provide a proposal b ased on
their Category of expertise and a selection/award will be made based on the following response and scoring criteria.
Firms Proposal Intent
The prospective firm shall select a category or categories with the submission of their proposal. The prospective firms may
propose up to three (3) categories by checking the box of each category. The prospective firms will only be awarded one (1)
category.
Category A – Aviation Planning Services
Category B – Architectural/Engineering Design Services for Airport Development Projects
Category C – Architectural/Engineering Construction Engineering Inspection Services for
Airport Development Projects
The prospective firm will rank each category in order of preference , if proposing on multiple categories. The prospective firm will
enter one (1) for the most preferred to three (3) being least preferred. The prospective firms proposing on a single category shall
not rank in an order of preference.
Category A – Aviation Planning Services
Category B – Architectural/Engineering Design Services for Airport Development Projects
Category C – Architectural/Engineering Construction Engineering Inspection Services for
Airport Development Projects
16.G.6.h
Packet Pg. 1572 Attachment: 20-7806 Solicitation (15298 : RFP 20-7806 Professional Services for Airports Rankings)
RESPONSE FORMAT AND SCORING CRITERIA FOR DEVELOPMENT OF SHORTLIST:
Proposals must be assembled, at minimum, in the order of the Evaluation Criteria listed or your proposal
may be deemed non-responsive
Evaluation Criteria Maximum Points
1. Ability of Professional Personnel 25 Points
2. Past Performance 25 Points
3. Project Approach, Willingness to Meet Time and Budget Requirements 25 Points
4. Recent, Current, and Projected Workloads of the Firm 25 Points
TOTAL POSSIBLE POINTS 100 Points
For complete explanation of each evaluation criteria, please see the file titled “RPS Instructions” included with this
advertisement.
VENDOR CHECKLIST
***Vendor should check off each of the following items as the necessary action is completed (please see, Vendor Check List)***
16.G.6.h
Packet Pg. 1573 Attachment: 20-7806 Solicitation (15298 : RFP 20-7806 Professional Services for Airports Rankings)