CESM Minutes 05/04/2007
May 4, 2007
MINUTES OF THE HEARING OF THE COLLIER COUNTY
SPECIAL MASTER
Naples, Florida, May 4, 2007
LET IT BE REMEMBERED, that the Collier County Special Master in
and for The County of Collier, having conducted business herein, met on this
date at 9:00 AM in REGULAR SESSION in Building "F" of the Government
Complex, Naples, Florida, with the following members present:
SPECIAL MASTER: Honorable Brenda Garretson
Sue Chapin - Secretary to the Special Master
COUNTY STAFF PRESENT:
Jeff Letourneau, Code Enforcement - Investigative Supervisor
HEARING OF THE COLLIER COUNTY SPECIAL MASTER
AGENDA
Date: May 4, 2007 at 8:30 A.M.
Location: 330 I E. Tamiami Trail, Naples, Florida. Collier County Government Center
Administrative Building "F", 3rd Floor
NOTE: ANY PERSON WHO DECIDES TO APPEAL A DECISION OF THE SPECIAL MASTER WILL NEED A
RI'CORD OF TIlE PROCEEDINGS PERTAINING THERETO, AND THEREFORE MA Y NEED TO ENSURE THAT A
VUmATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE, WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND
EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE BASED. NEITHER COLLIER COUNTY NOR THE SPECIAL
MASTER SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING THIS RECORD.
I, CALL TO ORDER - Special Master Brenda Garretson presiding
II. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
A. Hearing rules and regulations
III, APPROVAL OF MINUTES - April 20, 2007
V. PUBLIC HEARINGS
IV. MOTIONS FOR CONTINUANCE
A. Stipulations
B. Hearings
I.
CASE NO:
OWNER:
OFFICER:
VIOLATIONS:
SO ]6]923
ENTERPRISE LEASING COMPANY
DEP. KENNETH ROBINS
ORD. SEe. 130-66 (I )(H)
FIRE LANE
VIOLA TION
ADDRESS: BEST BUY
2.
CASE NO:
OWNER:
OFFICER:
VIOLATIONS:
VIOLA TION
ADDRESS:
3.
CASE NO:
OWNER:
OFFICER:
VIOLATIONS:
VIOLATION
ADDRESS:
DAS 11164
DAVID SPICER
DAS OFC. WILLIAM GEORGE
ORD. SEe. 14.4 I (A)5
TO LEAVE ANY ANIMAL IN A VEHICLE UNATTENDED AND WITHOUT
PROPER VENTILATION
12TH ST 5 & 6TH A VI' 5
DAS II 165
DA VID SPICER
DAS OFe. WILLIAM GEORGE
ORD. SEe. 14.41 (A)5
TO LEA VI' ANY ANIMAL IN A VEHICLE UNATTENDED AND WITHOUT
PROPER VENTILATION
12TH 5T S & 6TH AVE 5
4.
CASE NO:
OWNER:
OFFICER:
VIOLATIONS:
DAS ] ]410
LISA RIFFLE
DAS OFC.K. ZEITLER
ORD. SEe. 14.36 (A)(2)
TO ALLOW A DOG TO RUN AT LARGE
VIOLATION
ADDRESS: 25TH AVE SW (ROADWAY)
5.
CASE NO:
OWNER:
OFFICER:
VIOLA TlONS:
DAS 11411
LISA RIFFLE
DAS OFe. K. ZEITLER
ORD. SEC. 14.36 (A)(2)
TO ALLOW A DOG TO RUN AT LARGE
VIOLA TION
ADDRESS: 25TH AVE SW (ROADW A Y)
6.
CASE NO:
OWNER:
OFFICER:
VIOLA TlONS:
DAS 11412
LISA RIFFLE
DAS OFe. K. ZEITLER
ORD. SEe. 14.36 (A)(2)
TO ALLOW A DOG TO RUN AT LARGE
VIOLA TlON
ADDRESS: 25TH AVE SW (ROADWAY)
7.
CASE NO:
OWNER:
OFFICER:
VIOLA TIONS:
DAS 11503
CHRISTINE BARTLETT
DAS OFC. HINKLEY
ORD. SEe. 14.36 (A)(2)
TO ALLOW A DOG TO RUN AT LARGE
VIOLATION
ADDRESS 851 17TH ST SW
8.
CASE NO:
OWNER:
OFFICER:
VIOLATIONS:
DAS 11504
CHRISTINE BARTLETT
DAS OFC. HINKLEY
ORD. SEC. 14.34 (A)(4)
FAILURE TO AFFIX COLLIER COUNTY LICENSE
VIOLATION
ADDRESS: 851 17TH ST SW
9.
CASE NO:
OWNER:
OFFICER:
VIOLA TIONS:
DAS 1]505
CHRISTINE BARTLETT
DAS OFe. HINKLEY
ORD. SEe. 14.36 (A)(2)
TO ALLOW A DOG TO RUN AT LARGE
VIOLATION
ADDRESS: 851 17TH ST SW
10.
CASE NO:
OWNER:
OFFICER:
VIOLA TIONS:
CO 04038 2007020489
APPLE TRANSPORT A TION, INC C/O JOHN J. POELCER JR.
INV. M. CROWLEY
CHAPTER 142 CODE OF LA WS & ORDINANCES AND CHAPTER 142-58(F)(3)
AND 142-55(A)
OPERATED VEHICLE FOR HIRE SERVICE WITHOUT A THEN EFFECTIVE
PV AC CERTIFICATE TO OPERATE; AND FAILED TO RENEW THE
('I'RTlFICA TE TO OPERATE PRIOR TO EXPORATION ON JANUARY 31, 2007
VIOLATION
ADDRESS: COLLIER COUNTY
II,
CASE NO:
OWNER:
OFFICER:
VIOLA TIONS:
CO 044] 2007020493
PALM-AIR TRANSPORTATION, LLC C/O JOHN E. MCENTEE, JR
INV. M. CROWLEY
CHAPTER 142 CODE OF LAWS & ORDINANCES AND CHAPTER 142-58(F)(3)
AND 142-55(A)
OPERATED A VEHICLE FOR HIRE SERVICE WITHOUT A THEN EFFECTIVE
PVAC CERTIFICATE TO OPERATE. FAILED TO RENEW THE CERTIFICATE
TO OPERATE PRIOR TO THE EXPIRATION OF SAID CERTIFICATE ON
JANUARY 31, 2007.
VIOLATION
ADDRESS: COLLIER COUNTY
12.
CASE NO:
OWNER:
OFFICER:
VIOLATIONS:
CE 3316
LORETTA LANZILLO
INV. STEPHEN A THEY
ORD. SEC. 130-66
UNLA WFUL AREA - ALONGSIDE A COUNTY STREET RIGHT OF WAY
VIOLATION
ADDRESS: VANDERBILT DR
13.
CASE NO:
OWNER:
OFFICER:
VIOLA TIONS:
20070]0083
JOSEFINA MUNOZ
INV. CAROL SYKORA
ORD. 2004-41 SEC.10401 & 2.0 LOO(B)
LAND USE & RECREATIONAL VEHICLES/EQUIPMENT - THREE
RECREATIONAL VEHICLES BEING UTILIZED FOR LIVING/SLEEPING
PURPOSES ON PROPERTY ZONED AGRICULTURAL WITH MOBILE HOME
OVERLA Y
VIOLATION
ADDRESS: 3026 IMMOKALEE DR (IMMOKALEE)
14. CASE NO: 2006] ]0321
OWNER: COURTHOUSE SHADOWS CONSOLIDATED HOLDINGS INC R/A
HOUSTON, JOSEPH
OFFICER: INV. CAROL SYKORA
VIOLATIONS: ORD. 2003-14 SEC(S). 5, 7
NO ADDRESS NUMBERS ON RESIDENCE LOCATED AT 414 BOOKER BLVD,
IMMOKALEE, FL IN VILLAGE RESIDENTIAL ZONE
VIOLATION
ADDRESS: 414 BOOKER BLVD (lMMOKALEE)
15.
CASE NO:
OWNER:
OFFICER:
VIOLATIONS:
2006080317
SCRIVENS SR EST, WILLIAM L1CLEVELAND BURGESS/JAMES SCRIVENS
INV. CAROL SYKORA
ORD. 2004-41 SEC(S). I 0.02.06(B)( I )(A), I 0.02.06(B)( I )(D), I 0.02.06(B)( I )(0)(1)
NO COLLIER COUNTY PERMITS FOR SECOND MOBILE HOME ON
PROPERTY LOCATED AT 424 15TH ST SE, IMMOKALE, FL IN MOBILE HOME
ZONING. MOBILE HOME WAS PARTIALLY DEMOLISHED BY OWNER WITH
NO PROGRESS SINCE JANUARY.
VIOLA TlON
ADDRESS: 424 15TH ST SE (IMMOKALEE)
16.
CASE NO:
OWNER:
OFFICER:
VIOLATIONS:
2006]00007
PATRICIA DOLAN
INV. JOE MUCHA
ORD. 04-58 SEe. 6 SUB SEe. 121, 12P, 19A
PROPERTY MAINTf'NANCE AND HOUSING VIOLATIONS
VIOLATION
ADDRESS:
17. CASE NO:
OWNER:
OFFICER:
VIOLA TIONS:
VIOLA TION
ADDRESS:
18. CASE NO:
OWNER:
OFFICER:
VIOLA TIONS:
VIOLATION
ADDRESS:
19. CASE NO:
OWNER:
OFFICER:
VIOLA TIONS:
VIOLATION
ADDRESS:
20. CASE NO:
OWNER:
OFFICER:
VIOLA TIONS:
VIOLATION
ADDRESS:
21. CASE NO:
OWNER:
OFFICER:
VIOLATIONS:
980 AUTO RANCH RD #5
2005 110422
OLLIE MAE LOWE EST., MARGARET A WRIGHT PR
INV. JOHN SANTAFEMIA
ORD. 22, ARTICLE II, SEC. 103. 11.1
UNSAFE BUILDINGS OR SYSTEMS - STRUCTURE IN SEVERE DISREPAIR
WHICH IS CAUSING AN UNSAFE AND HAZARDOUS CONDITION
903 CHARLOTTE ST
2007030326
DA VID SIRENORD
INV. RENALD PAUL
ORD. 04-41 SEe. 4.05.03( C)
MULTI-FAMILY DWELLING UNITS - VEHICLES PARKED ON THE FRONT
YARD AT 2136 SUNSHINE BLVD, NAPLES, 1'1,
2136 SUNSHINE BLVD
2007030325
DA VID SIRENORD
INV. RENALD PAUL
ORD. 04-4 I SEe. 2.0 I.OO(A)
INOPERABLE/UNTAGGED VEIIICLES - PURPLE FORD EXPLORER IN THE
DRIVEWAY WITII TWO FLAT TIRES
2136 SUNSHINE BLVD
2007030327
JACOB ALBERT
INV. RENALD PAUL
ORD. 04-41 SEe. 4.05.03( C)
MULTIPLE VEHICLES PARKED ON THE FRONT YARD AT 2112 SUNSHINE
BLVD
2 I 12 SUNSHINE BL VD
2007010974
AGUSTIN AND/OR BERTHA CISNERAS
INV. AZURE SORRELS
ORD. 04-41 SEe. 2.0 1.00(A)
INOPERABLE/UNTAGGED VEHICLES - WHITE FORD PROBE WITHOUT A
CURRENT VALID LICENSE PLATE ATTACHED, PARKED IN DRIVEWA Y.
VIOLA TION
ADDRESS: 5331 GEORGIA AVE
VI. NEW BUSINESS
1.
A. Motion for Imposition of Fines:
CASE NO:
OWNER:
OFFICER:
VIOLATIONS:
2006070]63
LAKER INVEST. MGMT, JOSEPH HOUSTON (DIRECTOR)
INV. JOHN SANTAFEMIA
ORD. 04-58 SEC. 10, II, 12B, C,D, 1" M, N, P, 19A&B & 20
MINIMUM HOUSING VIOLATIONS
VIOLA TION
ADDRESS: 437 CARVER ST
.
2.
CASE NO:
OWNER:
OFFICER:
VIOLA TIONS:
2006080472
JEAN CLAUDE MARTEL
INV. JOE MUCHA
ORD. 04-58 SEe. 6. SUB SEC. 1,4,9, II, 12B, C, I, 1" 0, P, 19 A,D & 20
MINIMUM HOUSING VIOLATIONS
VIOLATION
ADDRESS: 3152 KAREN DR
3.
CASE NO:
OWNER:
OFFICER:
VIOLATIONS:
2006081112
JEAN CLAUDE MARTEL
INV. JOE MUCHA
ORD. 04-58 SEe. 6 SUB SEC. 4, 5, 12B, P, 19A,B,C, 20
MINIMUM HOUSING VIOLATIONS
VI01.A TlON
ADDRESS: 3176 KAREN DR
4.
CASE NO:
OWNER:
OFFICER:
VIOLA TIONS:
2006070299
JOSE A. ORTEGA
INV. HEINZ BOX
ORD. 2004-41 SEC. 2.02.03
MAINTAINING OR ALLOWING THE OPERATION OF AUTOMOBILE REPAIR
BUSINESS FROM THE SUBJECT PROPERTY THAT IS LOCATED IN A
VILLAGE RESIDENTIAL ZONED AREA
VIOLA TlON
ADDRESS: 3107 KAREN DR
5.
CASE NO:
OWNER:
OFFICER:
VIOLATIONS:
2006070434
WILLIAM WILLIAMS
INV. JOHN SANTAFEMIA
ORD. 04-58 SEC.6 SUB SEC. I, I I, 12B, C, I, 1" & 20
NUMEROUS MINIMUM HOUSING VIOLATIONS
VIOLATION
ADDRESS: 641 N 9TH ST
6.
CASE NO:
OWNER:
OFFICER:
VIOLATIONS:
2006050413
RONALD ABEL
INV. JEFF LETOURNEAU
ORD. 04-41 SEe. 2.0 I.OO(A)
UNLICENSED/INOPERABLE VEHICLES ON RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY
VIOLA TlON
ADDRESS: 2172 41 ST TERR SW
7.
CASE NO:
OWNER:
OFFICER:
VIOLA TIONS:
2006080097
DEN RIQUE BASTIEN
INV. JOE MUCHA
ORD. 04-41 SEe. 20 1.00( I)
UNLICENSED/INOPERABLE VEHICLES
VI01.ATlON
ADDRESS: 5471 CAROLINA AVE
B. Motion for Reduction of Fines:
VII. OLD BUSINESS
A. Request to forward case for Collections / Foreclosure:
VIII. CONSENT AGENDA-
A. Recommendation to approve the Imposition of Lien for owners of record who have failed to pay invoices
resulting from nuisance abatement violation enforcement actions.
IX. REPORTS
X. NEXT MEETING DATE: May 18,2007
XI. ADJOURN
May 4, 2007
I. CALL TO ORDER
The Meeting was called to order by the Honorable Special Master Brenda Garretson at
9:00 AM. All those testifying at this proceeding today did so under oath.
A. Hearing Rules and Regulations were given by Special Master Garretson. Special
Master Garretson noted that, prior to conducting the Hearing, the Respondents
were given an opportunity to speak with their Investigating Officer for a
Resolution by Stipulation; looking for compliance without being punitive.
RECESS: 9:14AM
RECONVENED: 9:30 AM
II. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
Jeff Letourneau, Code Enforcement Investigative Supervisor, proposed the following changes:
. The Respondent was changed to Ralph Lytle in Case #SO 161923.
. Case # CE 3316 - BCC vs. Loretta Lanzillo was withdrawn by the County.
. The County requested a Continuance in Case # 2006050413 - BCC vs. Ronald
Abel. The Respondent wilI receive notice of the new hearing date.
. Case # 2006080097 - BCC vs, Denrique Bastien was withdrawn by the County.
. Cases # DAS 11503, DAS 11504 and DAS 11505 - (all) BCC vs. Christine Bartlett
were removed from the Agenda due to payment of fines.
. Case # CO 0441 - BCC vs, Palm-Air Transportation, LLC, was removed from the
Agenda due to payment of fines.
. In Case #1007030327 - BCC vs. Jacob Albert, a second Case ("A") was added to
the Agenda.
. Cases #2007040039 and #2007040275 - (both) BCC vs, Jill Weaver and Henry
Tesno were added to the Agenda.
Stipulations were reached in the followin!! cases:
Item 18, Case # 2007030326 - BCC vs. David Sirenord
Item 19, Case # 2007030325 - BCC vs. David Sirenord
Item 13, Case # 2007010083 - BCC vs. Josefina Munoz
Item 16, Case # 2006100007 -BCC vs. Patricia Dolan
Item 17, Case # 200511 0422 - BCC vs. Ollie Maw Lowe Estate
Item 21, Case # 2007010974 - BCC vs, Agustin and/or Bertha Cisneras
The Special Master approved the agenda as amended, subject to any changes made
during the course of the Hearing at the discretion of the Special Master.
III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - April 20, 2007
The Minutes of the Hearing held on April 20, 2007 were reviewed by the Special Master and
approved as submitted.
IV. MOTlON(S) FOR CONTINUANCE - None
2
May 4, 2007
V. PUBLIC HEARINGS
A, Stipulations:
18, Case # 2007030326 - BCC vs. David Sirenord
The Hearing was requested by Collier County Code Enforcement Investigator Renald Paul
who was present.
The Respondent was not present.
Violation(s): Ordinance 04-41, Section 4.05.03(C)
Vehicles parked on front yard (Multi-family dwelling units)
Address of violation: 2136 Sunshine Blvd., Collier County
A Stipulation was agreed to by the Respondent on April 19. 2007.
Investigator Paul stated he met with the Respondent on April 19, 2007; the violations had
been abated, and the Operational Costs had been paid by the Respondent.
Finding the Notice of Hearing was properly served, and finding the violation did exist
but was CORRECTED prior to today's Hearing, the Respondent was found GUILTY
of the violation(s) as alleged.
The Respondent has paid the Operational Costs in the amount of $145. 00 incurred
during the prosecution of this case.
19, Case # 2007030325 - BCC vs, David Sirenord
The Hearing was requested by Collier County Code Enforcement Investigator Renald Paul
who was present.
The Respondent was not present.
Violation(s): Ordinance 04-41, Section 2.01.00(A)
Inoperable/untagged vehicles
Address of violation: 2136 Sunshine Blvd., Collier County
A Stipulation was agreed to by the Respondent on April 19, 2007.
Investigator Paul stated he met with the Respondent on April 19, 2007; the violations had
been abated, and the Operational Costs had been paid by the Respondent.
Finding the Notice of Hearing was properly served, and finding the violation(s) did exist
but were CORRECTED prior to today's Hearing, the Respondent was found GUILTY
of the violation(s) as alleged.
The Respondent has paid the Operational Costs in the amount of $145,00 incurred
during the prosecution of this case.
V. A. 13. Case # 2007010083 - BCC vs. Josefina Munoz
The Hearing was requested by Collier County Code Enforcement Field Supervisor Carol
Sykora who was present.
The Respondent was not present.
3
May 4, 2007
Violation(s): Ordinance 04-41, Sections 1.04.00 and 2.01.00(B)
Land use and recreational vehicles/equipment on property - three recreational
vehicles being used for living/sleeping .purposes on property zoned
agricultural with mobile home overlay.
Address of violation: 3026 Immokalee Drive, Collier County
A Stipulation was agreed to by the Respondent on May 3, 2007.
Field Supervisor Sykora stated the violations have been abated and the Respondent had
agreed to pay the Operational Costs.
Finding the Notice of Hearing was properly served, and finding the violations did exist
but were CORRECTED prior to today's Hearing, the Respondent was found GUILTY
of the violations as alleged.
The Respondent was ordered to pay Operational Costs in the amount of $200.38 incurred
during the prosecution of this case on or before June 4,2007,
16. Case # 2006100007 - BCC vs. Patricia Dolan
The Hearing was requested by Collier County Code Enforcement Property Maintenance
Specialist Joe Mucha who was present.
The Respondent had been present earlier and had entered into a Stipulation, but left before
the Hearing could be heard.
Violation(s): Ordinance 04-58, Sections 6, subsections 12 (I) and (P), 19(A)
Property maintenance and housing violations.
Address of violation: 980 Auto Ranch Rd #5, Collier County
A Stipulation was agreed to by the Respondent.
Investigator Mucha stated he inspected the site and the violations had been abated; the
Respondent agreed to pay the Operational Costs.
Finding the Notice of Hearing was properly served, and finding the violations did exist
but were CORRECTED prior to today's Hearing, the Respondent was found GUILTY
of the violations as alleged.
The Respondent was ordered to pay Operational Costs in the amount of$197,99 incurred
during the prosecution of this case on or before June 4,2007.
V. A. 17. Case # 2005110422 - BCC vs. Ollie Mae Lowe Estate, Marl!aret A. Wril!ht, PR
The Hearing was requested by Collier County Code Enforcement Investigator John
Santafemia who was present.
The Respondent was represented by Margaret A. Wright.
Violation(s): Ordinance 22, Article II, Section 103.1 J.J
Unsafe buildings or systems - structure in severe disrepair.
Address of violation: 903 Charlotte Street, Collier County
4
May 4, 2007
A Stipulation was agreed to by Margaret A. Wright as Personal Representative for the Estate
of Ollie May Lowe.
Finding the Notice of Hearing had been properly served, the Respondent was found
GUlL TY of the violations alleged and was ordered to obtain all required permits to
either repair or remove the structure and obtain a Certificate of Occupancy/Completion
on or before August 4,2007, or afine of$100.00 per day would be imposedfor each day
the violations remained thereafter, unless altered by a subsequent Stipulation or Order
of the Special Master.
The Respondent was ordered to pay Operational Costs in the amount of $238.74 incurred
during the prosecution of this case on or before August 4,2007.
The Respondent was ordered to notifY the Investigator within 24 hours of a workday to
concur the violation had been abated.
21. Case # 2007010974 - BCC vs. Al!ustin Cisneras and/or Bertha Cisneras
The Hearing was requested by Collier County Code Enforcement Investigator Azure Sorrels
who was present.
The Respondent, Agustin Cisneras, was also present.
The Respondent's daughter was present to serve as translator.
Violation(s): Ordinance 04-41, Section 2.01.00(A)
Inoperable/untagged vehicle parked in driveway
Address of violation: 5331 Georgia Avenue, Collier County
A Stipulation was agreed to by Agustin Cisneras on behalf of himself and his wife, Bertha
Cisneras.
Finding the Notice of Hearing had been properly served, the Respondents were found
GUILTY of the violations alleged and were ordered to obtain and affIX a valid license
plate to the vehicle, or to remove the vehicle from the property, or to store the vehicle in
an enclosed structure on or before May 7,2007, or afine of $50. 00 per day would be
imposed for each day the violations remained thereafter, unless altered by a subsequent
Stipulation or Order of the Special Master.
The Respondents were ordered to pay Operational Costs in the amount of$163,81
incurred during the prosecution of this case on or before June 4,2007,
The Respondents were ordered to notifY the Investigator within 24 hours of a workday
to concur the violation had been abated.
V. B. Hearinl!s:
1. Case # SO 161923 - BCC vs. Ralph Lvtle
The Hearing was requested by the Respondent who was present.
Collier County Deputy SheritIKenneth Robins was also present.
Violation(s): Ordinance 130-66, Section I(H)
Fire Lane
5
May 4, 2007
The Respondent stated he was employed by Best Buy and had parked his car in the area
that Best Buy uses as a loading zone.
Deputy Robins stated the vehicle was parked in the fire lane. He also stated the only
signage visible identified the area as a fire lane.
Finding the Notice of Hearing had been properly served, the Respondent was found
GUILTY of the violation alleged and was ordered to pay a civil fine of $3 O.00 on or
before June 4,2007, unless altered by a subsequent Stipulation or Order of the Special
Master.
The Respondent was ordered to pay Operational Costs in the amount of $50.00 incurred
during the prosecution of this case on or before June 4, 2007,
Total Fine: $80.00
2. Case # DAS 11164 - BCC vs. David Suicer
3. Case # DAS 11165 - BCC vs. David Suicer
The Hearing was requested by the Respondent who was not present.
Collier County Department of Animal Services Officer Kubicsek was present
representing Officer William George.
Violation(s): Ordinance 14-41, Section 5(A)
To leave any animal in a vehicle unattended and without property
ventilation
The Special Master noted the Respondent sent a letter and a photograph to the Court.
The letter stated the Respondent contested the violation because his vehicle had been
parked in the shade with all windows and the roof vent partially open. The letter stated
the Respondent would not intentionally place his animals in jeopardy.
Officer Kubicsek stated the file contained a copy of the Respondent's letter and she
would present the case based on Officer George's notes. Officer Kubicsek stated a dog
could suffer heat stroke within fifteen minutes of being left in a non-ventilated vehicle.
Officer Kubicsek stated the roof vent was not open and she considered the situation to
have been "aggravated" due to the heat and time involved since the animals were left
unattended for over fifteen minutes.
V. B. Finding the Notice of Hearing had been properly served, the Respondent was found
GUlL TY of the violations alleged in Citations 11164 and 11165 and was ordered to
pay a civil penalty of$250.00for each Citation, together with a DASfee of$7.00 per
Citation, on or before June 4, 2007,
The Respondent was ordered to pay Operational Costs in the total amount of$50,00
incurred during the prosecution of this case on or before June 4,2007,
Total Fines: $564.00
6
May 4, 2007
4. Case # DAS 11410 - BCC vs. Lisa Riffle
5. Case # DAS 11411- BCC vs.. Lisa Riffle
6. Case # DAS 11412 - BCC vs. Lisa Riffle
The Hearing was requested by the Respondent who was present.
Collier County Department of Animal Services Officer K. Zeitler was also present.
Violation(s): Ordinance 14-36, Section 2(A)
To allow a dog to run at large
The Respondent presented photographs of her fenced yard where she stated she had
made repairs to prevent the dogs from escaping. Two of the dogs were from the DAS
Animal Shelter; she has since returned them to the Shelter. Her remaining dog does not
try to escape.
Photographs were marked as Respondent's Exhibit "A" (fence with palm tree to the left),
"B" (long shot of the house and fence), and "C" (close up of the fence showing the
Labrador and a Pug) and entered into evidence.
Officer Zeitler stated the Citations were issued based on two separate affidavits which
marked as County's Exhibit "A" (Donna's affidavit) and Exhibit "B" (Marsha's
affidavit) and admitted into evidence.
Finding the Notice of Hearing had been properly served, the Respondent was found
GUILTY of the violations alleged and was ordered to pay a civiljine of $1 00, 00 per
Citation, together with a DASfee of$7.00 per Citation, on or before June 4, 2007,
unless altered by a subsequent Stipulation or Order of the Special Master.
The Respondent was ordered to pay Operational Costs in the total amount of$30.00
incurred during the prosecution of this case on or before June 4, 2007.
Total Fines: $351.00
V. B. 10. Case # CO 04039 - BCC vs. Apple Transportation, Inc.. c/o John J. Poelker, Jr.
The Hearing was requested by the Respondent who was present.
Collier County Code Enforcement Investigator Michaelle Crowley was also present.
John McDougal, Michael Soperak, Assistant Collier County Attorney Thomas Palmer
appeared as witnesses.
Violation(s): Chapter 142, Code of Laws and Ordinances, l42-58(F)(3) and l42055(A)
Operated a vehicle for hire without a then effective PV AC certificate;
Failed to renew the certificate prior to expiration on January 31, 2007
The Respondent's last name is spelled P-o-e-l-k-e-r. He stated he relied on information
obtained at a PV AC meeting held on June 5, 2006 during which the assistant Collier County
attorney, Thomas Palmer, stated that a company licensed in Lee County that comes into
Collier County only to drop off, and not to solicit business, does not need a PV AC certificate.
7
May 4, 2007
John McDougal was called as a witness. He stated he is a consultant who is licensed in
Florida. He presented a copy of a memorandum from Me. Palmer, dated April 16, 2007,
which was marked as Respondent's Exhibit "A" and was admitted into evidence.
Michael Soperak was also called as a witness. He stated that Me. Palmer had indicated that
a PV AC certificate was not needed to operate in Collier County for pre-arranged, prepaid
return trips.
The Special Master stated she would take Judicial Notice of the fact that a hearing took place
in June, 2006, and both sides agreed that Assistant County Attorney Palmer gave information
that rnay have led to the present confusion.
Investigator Crowley stated that if a passenger is picked up in Collier County at a later date
(not part of a contiguous trip), the Collier County ordinance would be triggered and the
vehicle for hire would be required to have a Certificate.
Assistant County Attorney Thomas Palmer stated it was clear that the Collier County
Ordinance prohibits return trips to pick up passengers at a later date; the Ordinance only
allows for contiguous trips. He stated his memo, dated April 16, 2007, discussed how this
situation might be changed if the PV AC made recommendations to the Collier County Board
of County Comrnissioners and if the Board determined to revise the Ordinance.
The Special Master stated that she would hear the tape of the Lee County meeting since this
was the third transportation company cited for violating the Ordinance. The Special Master
called for a recess in order to allow the tape to be set up.
RECESS: 11:06 AM
RECONVENED: 11:16 AM
Michelle Arnold, Code Enforcement Director, suggested that the Special Master listen to
the tape. She further suggested that the Special Master make a decision regarding this
case, but withhold assessing penalties until after the transportation company obtained its
Certificate to Operate ("CTO").
V, B. Attorney Palmer stated the tape would show there was a good faith mistake and
whatever the company did, it was because it relied upon the mis-information.
Michelle Arnold suggested that the parties negotiate off-site and return to the Special
Master with an actual agreement.
The Special Master concurred with the suggestions and stated the tape could be placed
into evidence and viewed later if necessary.
14. Case # 2006110321 - BCC vs. Courthouse Shadows Consolidated Holdinl!s. Inc.,
Rel!istered Al!ent. Joseph Houston
The Hearing was requested by Collier County Code Enforcement Field Supervisor Carol
Sykora who was present.
The Respondent was not present.
Violation(s): Ordinance 03-14, Sections 5 and 7
8
May 4, 2007
Repeat Offense: No address numbers on residence located in village residential zone
Address of violation: 414 Booker Blvd, Collier County
Field Supervisor Sykora stated she observed the lack of identifying numbers on the
residence in November, 2006, and sent a Notice of Violation to the Registered Agent via
certified mail; the USPS verified delivery on November 18, 2006. She stated she spoke
to the Resident Agent in December, 2006, concerning the problem. The numbers had not
been placed on the residence by February, 2007.
Finding the Notice of Hearing had been properly served, the Respondent was found
GUILTY of the violation(s) as alleged and was ordered to obtain and affIX 4" high
address numbers to the residence on or before May 7, 2007, or afine of $50. 00 per day
would be imposed for each day the violation remained thereafter, unless altered by a
subsequent Stipulation or Order of the Special Master.
The Respondent was ordered to pay Operational Costs in the amount of $159.37 incurred
during the prosecution of this case on or before June 4,2007,
The Respondent was ordered to notifY the Investigator within 24 hours of a workday to
concur the violation had been abated.
15. Case # 2006080317 - Estate of William L. Scrivens, Sr.. Cleveland Bure:ess and
James Scrivens
The Hearing was requested by Collier County Code Enforcement Field Supervisor Carol
Sykora who was present.
The Respondent, Cleveland Burgess, was also present.
Respondent, James Scrivens, was not present.
v. B. Violation(s): Ordinance 04-41, Sections 10.02.06(B) (I) (A) and (D), and
1O.02.06(B) (I) (D) (I)
No permits for second mobile home on property located in mobile
home zoning; mobile home was partially demolished by owner with no
progress since January, 2007
Address of violation: 424 15th Street, SE, Collier County
Field Supervisor Sykora stated in August, 2006, she observed an illegal second mobile
home on the property and sent a Notice of Violation via certified maiL In September,
Mr. Burgess contacted the office and Supervisor Sykora extended his time to comply.
Supervisor Sykora introduced photographs of the property which were marked as County
Exhibit "A" (page I), Exhibit "B" (page 2), Exhibit "C" (page 3), Exhibit "0" (page 4),
and Exhibit "E" (page I at bottom - single photograph) and entered into evidence.
The Special Master asked the Respondent ifhe had contacted his brother and ifhe knew
about the Hearing. The Respondent stated that he was not representing his brother,
James Scrivens.
The Respondent stated he was attempting to tear down the mobile home but that he had
health problems.
9
May 4, 2007
The Special Master asked the Respondent ifhe had a permit for the mobile home to be
on the property and ifhe had obtained a permit for the demolition. The Respondent
stated the mobile home was used primarily for storage.
Finding the Notice of Hearing had been properly served, the Respondents were found
GUILTY of the violation(s) as alleged and were ordered to complete demolition of the
mobile home and to remove all related debris to an appropriate disposal site on or
before June 4, 2007, or Collier County would complete the demolition and remove all
related debris and the cost would be assessed to the Respondents.
The Respondents were ordered to pay Operational Costs in the amount of $200.38
incurred during the prosecution of this case on or before June 4, 2007.
The Respondents were ordered to notifY the Investigator within 24 hours of a workday
to concur the violation had been abated,
10. Case # CO 04038 - BCC vs. App]e Transportation. Inc.. c/o John J. Poelker. Jr.
(Continued)
Michelle Arnold stated the parties agreed to a Stipulation:
. the parties agree there was a technical violation of the Ordinance;
. the violation was not willful due to good faith reliance on discussions and
information provided as a meeting that occurred in June, 2006;
. that App]e Transportation, Inc. was eligible to obtain, and should apply for, aCTO
from PV AC
V. B. Ms. Arnold stated the parties were still not in agreement concerning the amount of
the penalty to be assessed. Staff had suggested a penalty in an amount between one
dollar and $500.
The Special Master ruled that the Stipulation was accepted and that the violation
of the Ordinance was technical, not willful, The Special Master further ruled that
this violation, due to its nature, would not be grounds to withhold a Certificate to
Operation from Apple Transportation, Inc. by the PVAC. The Special Master
assessed a civil penalty of$250.00 to be paid on or before May 18, 2007.
The Special Master noted that the tape she had considered hearing had not been entered
into evidence; it was returned to the Respondent.
20. Case # 2007030327 - BCC vs. Jacob Albert
The Hearing was requested by Collier County Code Enforcement Investigator Rena]d Paul
who was present.
The Respondent was also present.
Violation(s): Ordinance 04-4], Section 4.05.03(C)
Multiple vehicles parked on front yard
Address of violation: 2]]2 Sunshine B]vd., Collier County
10
May 4, 2007
Investigator Paul presented photographs taken in March, 2007, and which were marked
as County's Composite Exhibit "A" and entered into evidence. He stated the Respondent
had been served previously for the same violation. Investigator Paul stated although this
violation had been abated, the Respondent was before the Special Master due to the
recurring nature of the violation.
The Respondent stated he had warned his tenants that they must observe the parking rules.
Finding the Notice of Hearing had been properly served, the Respondent was found
GUlL TY of the violation(s) as alleged and was ordered to remove all vehicles from the
front yard of the property on or before May 7,1007, or afine of $50. 00 per day per
vehicle would be imposed for each day the violation remained thereafter, unless altered
by a subsequent Stipulation or Order of the Special Master.
The Respondent was ordered to pay Operational Costs in the amount of $145.00
incurred during the prosecution of this case on or before June 4,1007.
The Respondents were ordered to notify the Investigator within 14 hours of a workday
to concur the violation had been abated,
20-A. Case # 2007040109 - BCC vs. Jacob Albert
The Hearing was requested by Collier County Code Enforcement Investigator Renald Paul
who was present.
Code Enforcement Investigative Supervisor Jeff Letourneau was also present.
The Respondent was also present.
V. B. Violation(s): Ordinance 04-55, Section 19(C)
Emergency Hearing: Infestation of bees entering and exiting the roof of the residence
Address of violation: 2112 Sunshine Blvd., Collier County
Investigator Paul stated he was at the premises for another purpose when he noticed a
swarm of bees entering and exiting the roof of the residence. He stated he called the
Respondent to alert him to this situation which the Investigator classified as an emergency
since there were small children at the residence. On April 26, 2007, the Investigator
returned to the site and observed that the issue had not been corrected.
Investigative Supervisor Letourneau stated he spoke with the Respondent and told him that
the roof was still not fixed. He also informed the Respondent the case would be set for a
hearing.
The Respondent said he had attempted to repair the hole in the roof, and had used a spray
to kill the bees. He further stated that since he was in Naples, he would seal the hole in the
roof.
Finding the Notice of Hearing had been properly served, the Respondent was found
GUILTY of the violation(s) as alleged and was ordered to pay a civil penalty of $300. 00
on or before June 4, 1007.
II
May 4, 2007
The Respondent was further ordered to rid the property of any infestation on or before
May 9, 2007, or afine of$500,00 per day would be imposed for each day the violation
remained thereafter, unless altered by a subsequent Stipulation or Order of the Special
Master,
The Special Master ordered the Respondent to provide proof of the removal of the bees
by furnishing a statement from a professional company. If such statement is produced,
the civil fine will be reduced by the cost paid to the bee removal company,
If the Respondent removes the infestation by himself, he is ordered to provide clear
photographs to the Investigator as evidence of the complete removal of the bees from the
property.
The Respondent was ordered to pay Operational Costs in the amount of $145. 00
incurred during the prosecution of this case on or before June 4,2007,
The Respondent was ordered to notifY the Investigator within 24 hours of a workday to
concur the violation had been abated.
22. Case # 2007050039 - BCC vs. Henrv Tesno and Jill Weaver
The Hearing was requested by Collier County Code Enforcement Property Maintenance
Specialist Joe Mucha who was present.
The Respondents were not present, but were represented by Eddie Dayton.
Violation(s): Ordinance 04-58, Section 6(1)(2)(5)(9)(10) and (11)
Emergency Housing violations
Address of violation: 3205 Lunar Street, Collier County
V, B. Property Maintenance Specialist Mucha stated he had received a complaint about
the property. He made a site visit to the property and observed a mobile home that
was rented without hot and cold water supply. The tenant stated the water supply had
been turned off and the water meter had been removed by the City of Naples. The
Investigator presented a copy of a water bill, dated March 9, 2007, which was marked
as County Exhibit "A" and entered into evidence.
Mr. Dayton stated that Mr. Tesno could not be present and had authorized him to appear
on his behalf.
Supervisor Letourneau asked Mr. Dayton ifhe had any written proof of his authorization
to represent the Respondents.
Mr. Dayton did not have a written document due to the short notice; the property was
posted on May 3, 2007. Mr. Dayton asked if the hearing could be continued to another
date so the Respondents could appear.
The Special Master stated she would take Judicial Notice that Mr. Dayton testified in a
previous case he had been hired by the Respondents as their property manager. The
Special Master denied the Request for a Continuance because this issue concerns the
health and safety of the tenants.
12
May 4, 2007
Property Maintenance Specialist Mucha presented a photograph of the properly which
was marked as County Exhibit "B" and entered into evidence.
Mr. Dayton stated this was an on-going problem; it was his understanding that the
previous tenant would move in, pay to have the water and electricity turned on. Mr.
Dayton stated the Respondenls are in the process of having the tenants evicted and
did not know if the Respondents had a written agreement with the tenants.
The Special Master determined that Mr. Dayton would be allowed to represent the
Respondents.
Finding the Notice of Hearing had been properly served, the Respondents were found
GUILTY of the violation(s) as alleged and were ordered to restore all utilities to the
property on or before May 7,2007, or afine of $250. 00 per day would be imposed for
each day the violation remained thereafter, unless altered by a subsequent Stipulation
or Order of the Special Master.
The Special Master ruled that these units could not be rented until the utilities have
been restored.
The Respondent was ordered to pay Operational Costs in the amount of$163.80
incurred during the prosecution of this case on or before June 4,2007.
The Respondents were ordered to notifY the Investigator within 24 hours of a workday
to concur the violation had been abated.
V. B. 23. Case # 2007040275 - BCC vs. Henrv Tesno and Jill Weaver
The Hearing was requested by Collier County Code Enforcement Property Maintenance
Specialist Joe Mucha who was present.
The Respondents nol present, but were represented by Eddie Dayton.
Violation(s): Ordinance 04-58, Section 6(1 through II), 12(d)(h)(i)(k)(l)(0)(p), 19(b)
Emergency Housing violations
Address of violation: 3137 Lunar Street, Collier County
Property Maintenance Specialist Mucha stated the emergency situation had been abated.
Mr. Dayton asked if the hearing could be continued to another date so the Respondents
could appear.
The Special Master GRANTED the Respondents' request for a Continuance. The
Respondents would receive proper notice concerning the date of the new Hearing,
RECESS: 12:50 PM
RECONVENED: 1:00 PM
VI. NEW BUSINESS
A. Motion for Imposition of Fines:
13
May 4, 2007
2. Case # 2006080472 - BCC vs. Jean Claude Martel
The County was represented by Code Enforcement Investigative Supervisor Jeff
Letourneau.
Property Maintenance Specialist Joe Mucha was present.
The Respondent was also present.
The County requested payment of Operational Costs of$132.45, the assessment of
a civil penalty of$I,OOO, and the imposition of fines of$68,500 for the period from
December 18, 2006 through May 4,2007 (137 days @ $500/day), for a total amount
of$69,632.45.
The Special Master asked the Respondent if he understood that the Hearing was for the
imposition of fines. The Respondent responded that he did.
Property Maintenance Specialist Joe Mucha replied that the violations had not been
abated and he had not been contacted by the Respondent.
The Respondent stated he has had problems with his tenants. His driver's license had
been suspended. He stated he did clean up the back of the property.
The Special Master explained to the Respondent that, as a result of his inability to
comply with the Order entered in October, 2006, a lien would be imposed on the
property which the County could enforce by selling the property.
VI. A. The Respondent stated that he did not agree with that. He stated "nobody had better
come to my property." He stated he worked all his life for his property. He further
stated, "They better not take my property because there's going to be a war. Guarantee
that."
The Special Master noted that the Respondent did not present any mitigating
information.
The Special Master GRANTED the County's motion for the imposition of a fine
in the amount of $69,632.45, The Special Master stated that she would allow a
reduction of $5,000 for each violation that the Respondent abated prior to August 4,
2007.
The Special Master ruled that the daily fined currently being accrued would be
waived if the violations were abated by August 4,2007.
The Respondent was ordered to pay this fine on or before August 4,2007, or the
County would proceed with enforcement of the lien.
The Special Master stated that she would reserve jurisdiction in this case and it
should be brought back to her.
3. Case #2006081112 - Jean Claude Martel
The County was represented by Code Enforcement Investigative Supervisor Jeff
Letourneau.
14
May 4, 2007
Code Enforcement Property Maintenance Specialist Joe Mucha was present.
The Respondent was also present.
The County requested payment of Operational Costs of$137.89, the assessment of
a civil penalty of $1 ,000, and the imposition offines of $1 ,000 for the period from
October 24, 2006 through October 26, 2006 (2 days @ $500/day), and the imposition
of fines of $70,000 for the period from December 16, 2006 to May 4, 2007 (140 days
@$500/day) for a total amount of$72,137.89.
The Respondent stated he had done a great deal of work on that property; the bees and
fifteen pounds of honeycombs had been removed, and he was able to remove his tenant.
Property Maintenance Specialist Mucha stated the abatement of the bee infestation was
completed by the County. He stated the Respondent had not contacted him with
notification of any other abatement.
He stated, "lawyers in this town are a bunch of crooks," and that he had no use for any
lawyers anymore.
VI. A. The Special Master GRANTED the County's motion for the imposition of a fine
in the amount of$72,137.89. The Special Master stated that she would allow a
reduction of $8,300 for each violation that the Respondent abated prior to August 4,
2007. The Special Master ruled that the daily fined currently being accrued would be
waived if the violations were abated by August 4,2007.
The Respondent was ordered to pay this fine on or before August 4, 2007, or the
County would proceed with enforcement of the lien.
The Respondent stated there were no violations on his property and that he refused to
accept the fines as imposed. The Respondent further stated, "What's wrong with you?
You people are something else over here. It's amazing. You're robbing people blind
over here, you know that?"
The Special Master informed the Respondent the purpose was to give him an opportunity
to erase a large amount of fines and to bring his property into compliance.
The Special Master ruled that she would reserve jurisdiction in this case and it
should be brought back to her.
5. Case # 2006070434 - BCC vs. William Williams
The County was represented by Code Enforcement Investigative Supervisor Jeff
Letourneau.
Code Enforcement Property Maintenance Specialist John Santafemia was present.
The Respondent was also present.
The County requested payment of Operational Costs of$157.16, and the imposition
of fines of$50,750 for the period from October 14,2006 through May 4, 2007
15
May 4, 2007
(203 days @$250/day), for a total amount of$50,907.16.
Property Maintenance Specialist Santafemia stated the roof had been repaired on the
property. He stated he has been unable to confirm abatement of the interior violations.
The Respondent stated the entire property had been repaired. He stated the new owner
of the property travels a great deal and the tenants would not allow him to inspect the
property. The Respondent stated he sold the property prior to the previous Hearing.
The Special Master reminded the Respondent that he had to disclose to the new owner
that there was possible fraud in the sale due to the property violations, and because
the property was sold between the time the Notice had been served and the Hearing was
scheduled.
The Special Master GRANTED the County's motion for the imposition of a fine
in the amount of $50,907.16, The Special Master advised the County to obtain the
address of the new owner in order to ascertain that she received a copy of the Order.
VI. A. The Special Master allowed a 40% credit for the repairs to the roof to reduce the fine
from $50,750 to $30,450.
The Special Master stated that if the new owner allows representatives of Code
Enforcement access to the property to verify that all of the violations have been
corrected by May 18, 2007, the fine of $30,450 would be reduced to $15,225 and the
Operational Costs of$157.16 would be waived.
1. Case # 2006070163 - Laker Investment Manae:ement, Joseph Houston, Director
The County was represented by Code Enforcement Investigative Supervisor Jeff
Letourneau.
The Respondent was not present.
The County requested payment of Operational Costs of $145.81, and the imposition
of fines of $150,000 for the period from October 16, 2006 through May 4, 2007
(200 days @ $750/day), for a total amount of$150,145.81.
The Special Master GRANTED the County's motion for the imposition of a fine
in the amount of $150,145,81.
The Respondent was ordered to pay this fine on or before August 4, 2007, or the
County would proceed with enforcement of the lien.
4. Case # 2006070299 - Jose A. Ortee:a
The County was represented by Code Enforcement Investigative Supervisor Jeff
Letourneau.
The Respondent was not present.
The County requested payment of Operational Costs of $150.61, a civil penalty of
16
May 4, 2007
$1,000, and the imposition of fines of $82,500 for the period from November 21, 2006
through May 4, 2007 (165 days @ $500/day), for a total amount of $83,650.61.
Supervisor Letourneau stated that a representative for Mr. Ortega had been present
earlier and informed him that the violations had been abated. Supervisor Letourneau
stated he would send an investigator to the property on May 7, 2007 to confirm
abatement.
The Special Master GRANTED the County's motion for the imposition of a fine
in the amount of $83,650. 61.
The Respondent was ordered to pay this fine on or before August 4, 2007, or the
County would proceed with enforcement of the lien,
*** The Special Master stated for the record that the amounts of the fines imposed
in the previous cases were so high primarily due to the long time period of non-
compliance and the daily accrual offines. The County considers minimum housing
violations to be serious due to its concern for the health and safety of its residents. ***
B. Motion for Reduction of Fines: - None
VII. OLD BUSINESS
A. Request to forward Case for Collections/Foreclosure: - None
VIII. CONSENT AGENDA - None
IX. REPORTS - None
X. COMMENTS - None
XI. NEXT MEETING DATE - May 18, 2007.
17
May 4, 2007
*****
There being no further business for the good of the County, the Hearing was adjourned by order
ofthe Special Master at 2:06 PM,
COLLIER COUNTY SPECIAL MASTER
Special Master, Brenda Garretson
These Minutes were approved by the Special Master on
as presented , or as amended
,2007,
18