Vanderbilt neighbourhood Stock Development One NaplesEXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links.
Dear Commissioner LoCastro:
As one of your constituents, I must tell you how impressed I have been by your first month on the Board. Your attention to detail is quite remarkable. Picking up on matters as seemingly
small as the cost of golf carts is just terrific. Keep it up!
But I am not writing you today to simply rave about your service. I am writing to express my concern about years, decades really, of County Commissioners putting developers ahead of
neighborhoods. Your predecessor was the perfect example. It is true that Stock Development was good to District 1. Stock is a good developer, generally recognizing the relationship
between what is good for the community with his need to make a profit. But your predecessor idolized him, and whatever he wanted she granted.
Because I generally think highly of Stock, I am astonished by what he is trying to do in District 2 at Vanderbilt Beach. I know it’s far from where I live, but I sure wouldn’t want such
a project in my neighborhood. Voting against Stock’s request for an amendment to the Growth Management Plan will send him back to the drawing board. Perhaps he can come up with a plan
that is more suited to the location.
You, as the “newbie,” have the chance to deliver a message that goes Far beyond Vanderbilt Beach. A vote to deny would deliver a message that you are for all the residents of the County
and that you stand against the “Miamification” of all neighborhoods in all Districts.
Thanks for your consideration, and keep up the good work.
Sincerely,
Commissionner Lo Castro,
I have been a owner in Naples (Vanderbilt Beach) for at least 40 years and have enjoyed all of what Naples
implemented in their rules and building codes and enforced them for many years on their growth management plans.
I do personnage know about all because 23 years ago I built a project on Vanderbilt Beach called Le Dauphin
9811 and 9790 Gulf Shore dr, and had to respect all rules and building codes .
(Wish I could have built 18 to 20 stories).
One Naples is asking all of you to change all those rules plus to disregard the recommendation of your Group Management Plan officials.
One Naples is even offering financial incentives to condominium associations to side with them on their project.
Are they that desperate ? to destroy our community and are you ready to break the existing rules.
Please respect all of the GMP recommendations this is all what we ask for.
You all live in Naples and there was a reason why you chose Naples.
I would think they knew the rules when they purchased the individual lands for their development.
Thank you
Richard Dubois
__________________________
Dear Commissioner LoCastro,
I am writing you today to express my opposition to the Stock Development One Naples as it is currently proposed. I was encouraged by the action of the Planning Commission and their inability
to recommend approval not only of the current Stock plan, but of a watered-down version that reduced the outrageous tower heights by almost 25%, and extremely diminished setbacks. They
did their job, protecting the community.
Now it’s your turn. Planning Commissioner Frye said it best when he asked the other Commissioners how they could ignore the outpouring of sentiment from the community. These are your
constituents, your voters. Isn’t it your responsibility to listen to those who will live with this atrocity for decades to come and to vehemently deny the developer the right to build
it?
If hundreds of emails exhorting you to deny the project are not enough, if more than eighty people who signed up to speak against the project at the Planning Commission are not enough,
if the 1,100 members of Save Vanderbilt Beach, forty percent of whom have contributed almost $100,000 to engage experts and fight the development are not enough, what exactly will be
enough to persuade you to do the right thing?
Please, when it comes before you, vote to deny the project as it is currently proposed.
In hopes of a more reasonable project, I am respectfully,
__________________________
Bp4qUTgm+rS0Lruy6ESLgRhtk3fSsm21Ct8D+mTgHlqAkIg8KrCdvJiV8V3pAjMNr7u3sd+54edQyspCP+YKoBTida3XfTqOy1fixa7k20TGWAnlbWGlRlJxCUow8uho/Ag2hkMjbqOOTevbu17lOx/DpZlTMK4HxcpWNiZpHzNBuUwN3q0TDWB4lE3bVZgbCIFkPy0
i6v+NL3x80foAlqyTyyILQQoeU6DemqX6mWQSGwkGW0cX9t/qy0yi9NdTvlBeya+v6SLwJ3Wh1UXoZf04SSWPGSX9dF7mxfMezumobzQ/IdoT/dHiRfk8e4p5uY1WlQ+vi0GVZyib5VpUcQb5aEdbnH0z6awxWm6PB1mauB6To/BL6TmIgRb1C+4R7Oh74mAQrwYfFR
3f2LHMzb3YQTx4MuZ7jrGVP6J0fodh/a+gYD42Y08swDoSW+x1a/UwQVUZotqpLjXQ1PmjD+S7fRJv3qjrLIeFlwcOfqtd98aMPzd3mQGP2hdv42wOHSfTFdijpM5KDPbX788jD6htyt4tgzdhrg5xqpc8QSZ4Dj1+B3Z9+3HXcUrP7XMLrmxAyzera5vDrNu4ptwQn
YeaWnWYXn7lWhi3SDLkFK0u9nLHrmHZqpu6lpoZQRJ6nwn/QUD6lSQBxg4Zq6YgiXYaGY82rAUmpWkLOhlqyaGIjv3YqaCpCxWˀ숀駹=ﮰⰗʱ