The URL can be used to link to this page

DSAC Minutes 04/11/2007 R April 11, 2007 MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE COLLIER COUNTY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ADVISORY COMMITTEE Naples, Florida, April 11, 2007 LET IT BE REMEMBERED, that the Collier County Development Services Advisory Committee in and for the County of Collier, having conducted business herein, met on this date at 1:00 P.M. in REGULAR SESSION in Conference Room 610 in the Collier County Development Services Center, 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida, with the following members present: STAFF PRESENT: Joe Schmitt, Administrator, CDES Don Scott, Nick Casalanguida, Transportation Phil Gramatges, Paul Kwa, Public Utilities Ed Riley, Fire Official Catherine Fabacher, Current Planning Paul Mattausch, Water Department Bill Hammond, Director Building Permitting and Review Tom Kuck, Engineering Services Marlene Stewart, Staff Liaison Chairman Bill Varian, CGR CAPS Charles Abbott James Boughton (unexcused) Clay Brooker David Bryant Dalas Disney David Dunnavant Marco Espinar (unexcused) Blair Foley (excused) George Hermanson Reed Jarvi Brian Jones Thomas Masters (unexcused) Robert Mulhere Fred Reisch! (unexcused) DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ADVISORY COMMITTEE I. Call to order AGENDA April 11, 2007 1 :00 p.m. Conference Room 610 II. Approval of Agenda III. Approval of Minutes from March 7, 2007 meeting IV. Staff Announcements A. Transportation Division Update - Don Scott 1. Planning Department Implementation of Meeting fees - Nick Casalanguida B. Public Utilities Division Update - Roy Anderson B. Fire Review Update - Ed Riley V. Old Business A. Discuss and decide what information DSAC is interested in seeing with regard to CDES VI. New Business 1. Joe Schmitt - CDES a. Discuss CDES current workload and actions to hold down costs b. Report on BCC/Fire District Workshop March 22nd c. Request to form Fire Ordinance Repeal DSAC subcommittee/Ad Hoc Committee 2. Paul Kwa - Public Utilities a. Presentation - new procedure for Potable Meter Sizing, discussion, vote 3. Time Certain: 3 pm - Catherine Fabacher - Zoning and Planning Review Dept.-CDES a. LDC Amendments VII. Committee Member Comments - time permitting VIII. Adjournment Next Meetinq Dates May 9,2007 - 1 PM, CDES 609/610 - 2007 Cycle 1 LDC Amendments (cont'd) June 6,2007 - 3:30 PM CDES 609/610 (Time may change) April 11, 2007 I. Call to Order Chairman Bill Varian called the meeting to order at 1:26 P.M. after a quorum was established. II. Approval of Agenda Dalas Disney moved to approve the Agenda. Second by David Dunnavant and carried unanimously, 8-0. III. Approval of Minutes - March 7, 2007 Change: Page 4 -- Dalas Disney left at 4:15 (not Clay Brooker) Add: The following statement is to be added into the minutes as requested by Chairman Varian: "It was agreed upon that the Minute Taker, i.e. Mancan, will e- mail final draft copy of minutes (before sending on to Minutes and Records) to DSA C Chairman, or his designee, to review for approximately 2 days. Chairman will look over for gross errors or misstatements and get this information back to Minute Taker for correction and before publishing. " George Hermanson moved to approve the minutes as amended with the change and addition as noted. Second by Clay Brooker and carried unanimously, 8-0. IV. Staff Announcements A. Transportation Division Update - Don Scott (taken up after New Business #2) 1. Planning Department Implementation of Meeting fees-Nick Casalanguida B. Public Utilities Division Update - Roy Anderson Phil Gramatges appeared for Roy Anderson and reported that the only update was the Potable Meter Sizing presentation, which is to be taken up under New Business. C. Fire Review Update - Ed Riley Ed Riley submitted his report in the Summary of Plan Review Activity for February- 2007 handout. V. Old Business: A. Discuss and decide what information DSAC is interested in seeing with regard to CDES. Main items brought up were: · Quarterly updated listings of number of building permit application, review times, planning and re-zoning aspects that used to be provided to DSAC monthly. The Members would like to better observe the trends in permits, reviews, etc. 2 April 11, 2007 Joe Schmitt will provide any requested information from building/review areas and planning/re-zoning areas. · Operations, staffing and budget review items that used to be handled by the Budget and Operations Subcommittee should be part ofDSAC's charges. Reviewing budget and a quarterly update was suggested. Preliminary budget review is in June and will be provided by Joe Schmitt. Gary Mullee noted that he can have a draft of the 2008 budget which will include 2007- 2008 comparisons for the next meeting. · Address reasons for repeated comments and rejections. Some suggestions were- for additional Staff, LDC or permit application education and/or that perhaps communications are not clear. Clear direction of what is needed may be the issue. Joe Schmitt noted there will be a Planning Intake Workshop on Friday addressing these issues and he will be able to give an update after that. David Bryant arrived at 1:43 PM VI. New Business 1. Joe Schmitt - CDES (sub-item- a. was taken up following sub-item- c.) a. Discuss CDES current workload and actions to hold down costs (handout) Joe Schmitt reported that: · Population and workload is in a downturn; February figures are showing down to 2004 level. · New starts (residential units) are down about half. · He is projecting zero growth next year based on current revenue. CDES has made significant cuts in anticipation ofthis. · Using reserves and trying to retain 3-4 million dollars in each fund (113 and 131). All discretionary spending is on hold. · All positions, vacancies and overtime are frozen. Up to 6 positions will be eliminated, some from reorganizations and some from attrition. · Plans are to combine Environment and Engineering Services into one Dept · Reduction of between 7 and 10 million dollars is expected. . Budget has to be income neutral with no fee increase. A significant impact is expected on the level of service and on other operations receiving funds from CDES, who provide support to the business industry. Lengthy discussion ensued on the particulars of the expected effects on reductions. b. Report on BCC/Fire District Workshop March 22 Joe Schmitt reported on the BCC/ Fire District Workshop and the many issues brought up and discussed, with the result that the BCC has asked the Manager to come back with some options to create a task force to review the whole process in general on Fire Permitting & Review and Building Permitting & Review; to note 3 April 11, 2007 duplication in reviews and if that duplication is warranted. Also asked was to come up with ideas of where to make improvements; to look at the Collier County Ordinances on Fire & Building Codes as they pertain to adopted codes and standards of the National Fire Protection Association, as amended for Florida; and to make recommendations for the amendment or repeal of the local code. Joe Schmitt announced the retirement of Tom Kuck. Bill Lorenz will be overseer of the consolidated divisions of Environmental and Engineering Services. Also, interviewing of 6 applicants for Bill Hammond's position of Building Permitting and Review Director is in progress. c. Request to form Fire Ordinance Repeal DSAC sub-committee/Ad Hoc Committee Joe Schmitt distributed copies of the Executive Summary draft, in conjunction with the above directive of the BCC. This was presented to the DSAC, for review and recommendation as to which of four outlined options regarding the forming of a Sub- Committee/Task Force would best carry out the directive. Summations of the four options are: 1. Delegate DSAC to serve as the entity to create a Sub-committee to address the issues and concerns which will make recommendations to the DSAC who will review and may make further recommendations to the BCe. 2. Create a Task Force - a task force consisting of one member from each of; Development Services Advisory Committee, Board of Adjustment and Appeals, Fire Steering Committee, Collier County Planning Commission and Collier County Productivity Committee. 3. Create a Task Force comprised of three members from each of, the Collier Building Industry, the Fire Steering Committee and the Collier Productivity Committee. 4. Delegate the responsibility to the Board of Adjustment and Appeals. A lengthy discussion followed on the pros and cons of each of the options with the result being that the DSAC, already an established committee and the objective being well within the scope of its interests and duties, supported Option 1 as the recommended choice. Brian Jones arrived at 1:55 PM Logistics and briefings by Joe Schmitt and Ed Riley were offered to the DSAC to help in the implementation of a Sub-committee and with any other expertise or information, as needed. Charlie Abbott moved to recommend supporting the adoption of Option number one (1). Second by George Hermanson and carried unanimously, 10-0. DSAC will report to the BCC any feedback as to the forming of the Sub-committee and how they intend to proceed. 4 April11, 2007 2. Paul Kwa - Public Utilities (handout) a. Presentation- new procedure for Potable Meter Sizing, discussion, vote Paul Kwa and Phil Gramatges distributed copies of four proposals and the current Portable Meter Sizing Form now used in the Utilities Standards Manual. Proposed is: · To divide the form into two separate forms; one that determines the ERC and Impact Fee calculations, and one that determines the required meter size according to design flow through the meter and the meter manufacturer specification sheet. · To change meter sizing process by allowing the consultant/developer to design the meter size using some guidelines as provided by Public Utilities, using the Florida Plumbing Fixture Count Table. · To have requests for meter size changes be done through Field Change with Engineering Review Services ofCDES · To continue conducting field tests to determine pressure drop across entire meter assembly in order to make recommendations to the Utilities Committee. This information to lead to instituting a 5 PSI maximum pressure drop across the meter, translating to a 15-20 PSI pressure drop across the entire meter assembly. Discussion revolved around how the Impact fee would be calculated on remodels where no new meters will be added and being asked to vote on something without being fully apprised of the new forms and the entire effects ofImpact fees where no meters are installed. Members re-stated their prior decision of not wanting to vote on anything that was not complete or that did not give them enough time for review. Utilities asked DSAC to vote on the concept of separating ERC calculation form from meter size calculation form. Some members suggested the actual forms could be reviewed later. Some calculations will fall outside the regular calculations and adjustments can be made for meter sizes. George Hermanson moved that the DSAC approve the procedure of separating the meter calculations from the ERC calculations, allowing the design engineer to perform those calculations within the guidelines of the Florida Plumbing Code as established by the County, with the stipulation that the form used be revised to provide for exceptions to the rule being granted for any constructions that do not involve meters, such as additions and remodels. And, that DSAC is able to review the revised form as to how the exceptions procedure will be handled. Second by Clay Brooker and carried unanimously 10-0. Paul Mattausch and Ed Riley provided input on differences in meter manufacturer's and standards and issues involved in meters pressure loss through backflow problems and meter sizes Section IV, A. Transportation Update was taken up at this time 5 April 11, 2007 Don Scott announced that he will be leaving the Transportation Division in two weeks, to work for the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO). Nick Casalanguida will be taking over Don Scott's position. Don stated the Impact Fee report will be available for next month's meeting. It will be sent out to everyone if it comes in earlier. They are looking at a 20-30% increase. Nick CasaIanguida explained that additional fees would be charged for repeated zoning and review meetings that are overly abusing submittal meeting times. Questions ensued regarding issues of fee distributions, funding, justifying costs and fees and consistency in charges. Nick also informed the DSAC the proposed Transportation GMP Amendment item is still going to the BCC with some changes. In January, the DSAC voted not to recommend this proposal. BREAK 3:03 PM MEETING resumed at 3: 1 0 PM 3. Catherine Fabacher-Zoning and Planning Review Dept.-CDES a. LDC Amendments (handouts) Catherine Fabacher announced: Change: in schedule -LDR Sub-committee meeting is Tuesday, April 24 in Room 610, not Thursday Requested: for DSAC Members to earmark the amendments to be referred to the Land Development Regulations (LDR) committee for their review. Added: two additional amendments to packet for review by DSAC. She stated that DSAC comments and recommendations will be submitted to LDR Sub-committee on April 24 and then back to DSAC on May 9, on any amendments not voted on at this meeting. Catherine Fabacher then announced three presenters would be speaking. 1. Bayshore/Gateway LDC Section 2.03.07 Jean Jourdan, Project Manager, spoke on the proposed LDC Amendment change to the design standards in the Bayshore Mixed Use District and the Gateway Triangle Mixed Use District, providing maps and Overlay information within the Community Redevelopment Area. Some of the changes proposed were: · Adding clarification in C-l through C-5 zoning districts and giving the option to follow LDC or BMUD Overlay regulations. . Option for using build- to line or set-back line, · Reduce the minimum required residential square footage and maximum height requirement · Changes to permitted land use tables and permitted accessory and conditional use tables. 6 Apri111, 2007 Members questioned the restrictions, when purpose of redevelopment was to improve the area, not restrict it. The DSAC's decision, after noting several corrections in the tables and in language used, was to revisit the proposed changes after reviewing. Any recommended changes will be discussed at the next meeting. 2. Private amendment request - E.B. Simmonds Electrical Co. LDC Section 5.05.13 Clay Brooker announced that as a DSAC committee member, he is allowed to discuss, but not vote, on this item due the conflict of interest as attorney for the party asking for the new Amendment. In that light, he provided the proper form explaining his abstention from voting. Clay Brooker, spoke on behalf of his client, to propose adding a new LDC Amendment that provides siteing, design and operation criteria for heliports. He cited that no criteria exist at this time; although "transportation by air" is a permitted use in the Industrial zoning district. He recited all the applicable Federal and State Administrative rules and County requirements needed and the comprehensive research done to institute this amendment. He explained the additions he included in the proposal are to satisfy all concerns by making it as restrictive as possible to assure its approval. Charlie Abbott left at 4:25 PM David Dunnavant moved to recommend approval of the amendment, taking out the 1500 feet of separation, reverting to the designated final approach and take off area for operation for the Administrative Code and FAA, creating its own setback. Second by David Bryant. Further discussion followed regarding private amendments and the request for added assurance that hospital heliports would not be permitted in C-5 zoning or PUDs, given the recommended reduction in the 1500 foot setback. David Dunnavant amended his motion to add clarification to Section C. 2. c., that hospital heliports would be permitted in C-4 zoning district only, not in C-5 or in PUDs. David Bryant amended his second and the motion carried, 8-0 with 1 (one) abstention by Clay Brooker. 3. Goodland Zoning Overlay (GZO) LDC Section 2.03.07 J/4.02.22 Connie Stegall-Fullmer presented information on the proposed changes which were to: · Revise side yard setbacks for "combined" lots in the GZO at 15% and request a maximum of double the 3,500 square feet under air, as total size of building. · Amending clam nursery and hatchery section · Existing signs be exempt from Collier County sign ordinance · Protecting remaining 25ft. lot smaller homes- can be reconstructed if destroyed by natural disasters. 7 April 11, 2007 · Create design guidelines and developments standards to preserve the small town environment of Goodland and to have this put into the LDC. She spoke at length about background and maps making up the original Overlay, the amendment to the Overlay, the surveys taken and meetings held. Amendment was based upon the results of the second of three surveys taken. Clay Brooker also abstained from voting on this amendment as he represents a home owner involved in this proposed change. He provided the proper form, for the record, explaining his abstention from voting. The Members questioned the impact on diminishing market value by limiting square footage, the 15% being too high, determination of the maximum square footage procedure and percentage of owners who voted in survey (less than 50%). Several questions also arose on the tables, confusing language and undefined meanings used in the amendment. They also were of the opinion that property values will be affected and properties were being treated disproportionately. They suggested more help with constructing the amendment would provide a better way to go about it, as many issues were already in the Codes. Public Speakers: Tom Cowles, Past President of Goodland Civic Association stated his satisfaction with overlay that is already in place. He provided the DSAC with the information listed on the Property Appraiser Tax Roll, showing there are 400 plus properties in Goodland, owned by approx 610 owners. Goodland Preservation Coalition has 85 members; 72 of those are part of the 150 member Goodland Civic Association. Traugott Schmidt, Goodland property owner, complemented prior speaker. Jim Inglis, Goodland property owner, spoke of the untruths given to the people by these Associations; not giving people chance for discussion; pushing people around and distortion of what others outside the Associations really think; sees a small group ruining Goodland and County should not be part of it. Niki Graham, Goodland realtor, stated she can't tell people what they may build anymore; need to slow the process down; not have people pushed and bullied with lies and scare tactics; asked for DSAC to ask some serious questions. Steve Camacho, Goodland property owner, stated combining lots proposal is a bad idea; setbacks not ever challenged on Overlay; setbacks on irregular lots do not work. He and more than 20 other property owners do not recognize either of the 2 Associations as representing them. Nor do they have right to limit the right to build. He also cited the environmental impact of septic tanks, stormwater management and FEMA requirements that will drain water on others, by maximizing lot sizes. He favors letting determination of variances be by elected officials, not by another layer of government. He asked that DSAC take a hard look at this whole thing. 8 April11, 2007 I1se Tessarik, Goodland resident and property owner since 1989. Content with the way things are; impressed with the exchange of comments and right to speak, saying- "Democracy works!" Rick Karnes, Goodland property owner, spoke against the proposed height restrictions and apologized that DSAC's time had to be wasted on something not at all properly presented. VII. Committee Member Comments Chairman Varian addressed the speakers, thanking them for their interest in coming to the meeting. He stated that the DSAC does not normally have public speakers, even though the meetings are open to the public. He wanted to apologize if they felt rushed in their opportunity to speak and informed them that other meeting will be held on the issue, inviting them to attend. Catherine Fabacher announced that the schedule of proposed LDC Amendment meetings is posted on the County's web site. The next meeting of the Development Services Advisory Committee will be on Wednesday May 9, 2007 at 1:00 P.M., in Room 610. There being no further business for the good of the County, the meeting was adjourned by order of the Chair at 5:08 P.M. ***** COLLIER COUNTY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ADVISORY COMMITTEE Bill Varian, CGR CAPS, Chairman These minutes approved by the Board/Committee on or as amended , as presented 9 FORM 8B MEMORANDUM OF VOTING CONFLICT FOR COUNTY, MUNICIPAL, AND OTHER lOCAL PUBLIC OFFICERS LAST NAME FIRST NAME MIDDLE NAME NAME OF BOARD, COUNCil, COMMISSION, AUTHORITY, OR COMMITTEE 6ROoKEI< CLA'/ (.. Il€VELOr"'ENI S;I'-Vl~"'~ ADVISOR.Y eo,."""TTa; MAILING ADDRESS A ~ THE BOARD, COUNCil, COMMISSION, AUTHORITY OR COMMITTEE ON 8",/ FIn/-! ve"u'" ~H #';;'0/ VvHICH I SERVE IS A UNIT OF: CITY COUNTY o CITY )(COUNTY o OTHER LOCAL AGENCY N ~ f'lf€.:5 FL 5'iloQ. (OLL/Et( NAME OF POLITICAL SUBDIVISION r OLL'''''- CPr>>JT'/ / DATE ON WHICH VOTE OCCURRED MY POSITION IS: APRIL /I .;)007 o ELECTIVE }i( APPOINTIVE WHO MUST FILE FORM 88 This form is for use by any person serving at the county, city, or other local level of government on an appointed or elected board, council, commission, authority, or committee. It applies equally to members of advisory and non-advisory bodies who are presented with a voting conflict of interest under Section 112.3143, Florida Statutes. Your responsibilities under the law when faced with voting on a measure in which you have a conflict of interest will vary greatly depending on whether you hold an elective or appointive position. For this reason, please pay close attention to the instructions on this form before completing the reverse side and filing the form. INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 112.3143, FLORIDA STATUTES A person holding elective or appointive county, municipal, or other local public office MUST ABSTAIN from voting on a measure which inures to his or her special private gain or loss. Each elected or appointed local officer also is prohibited from knowingly voting on a mea- sure which inures to the special gain or loss of a principal (other than a government agency) by whom he or she is retained (including the parent organization or subsidiary of a corporate principal by which he or she is retained); to the special private gain or loss of a relative; or to the special private gain or loss of a business associate. Commissioners of community redevelopment agencies under Sec. 163.356 or 163.357, F.S., and offIcers of independent special tax districts elected on a one-acre, one-vote basis are not prohibited from voting in that capacity. For purposes of this law, a "relative" includes only the officer's father, mother, son, daughter, husband, wife, brother, sister, father-in-law, mother-in-law, son-in-law, and daughter-in-law. A "business associate" means any person or entity engaged in or carrying on a business enterprise with the officer as a partner, joint venturer, coowner of property, or corporate shareholder (where the shares of the corporation are not listed on any national or regional stock exchange). ELECTED OFFICERS: In addition to abstaining from voting in the situations described above, you must disclose the conflict: PRIOR TO THE VOTE BEING TAKEN by publicly stating to the assembly the nature of your interest in the measure on which you are abstaining from voting; and WITHIN 15 DAYS AFTER THE VOTE OCCURS by completing and filing this form with the person responsible for recording the min- utes of the meeting, who should incorporate the form in the minutes. . APPOINTED OFFICERS: Although you must abstain from voting in the situations described above, you otherwise may participate in these matters. However, you must disclose the nature of the conflict before making any attempt to influence the decision, whether orally or in writing and whether made by you or at your direction. IF YOU INTEND TO MAKE ANY ATTEMPT TO INFLUENCE THE DECISION PRIOR TO THE MEETING AT WHICH THE VOTE WILL BE TAKEN: . You must complete and file this form (before making any attempt to influence the decision) with the person responsible for recording the minutes of the meeting, who will incorporate the form in the minutes. (Continued on other side) CE FORM 88 - EFF. 1/2000 PAGE 1 APPOINTED OFFICERS (continued) A copy of the form must be provided immediately to the other members of the agency. The form must be read publicly at the next meeting after the form is filed. IF YOU MAKE NO ATTEMPT TO INFLUENCE THE DECISION EXCEPT BY DISCUSSION AT THE MEETING: You must disclose orally the nature of your conflict in the measure before participating. You must complete the form and file it within 15 days after the vote occurs with the person responsible for recording the minutes of the meeting, who must incorporate the form In the minutes. A copy of the form must be provided immediately to the other members of the agency, and the form must be read publicly at the next meeting after the form is filed DISCLOSURE OF LOCAL OFFICER'S INTEREST I, Cuty ~ 6~oK.€f( , hereby disclose that on Af'RIL /I ,20QL: (a) A measure came or will come before my agency which (check one) inured to my special private gain or loss; inured to the special gain or loss of my business associate, inured to the special gain or loss of my relative, ,/ inured to the special gain or loss of iE.6. S'IY)IY)ONCS EU:CTIlI Ct L . /N(. , by whom I am retained; or inured to the special gain or loss of is the parent organization or subsidiary of a principal which has retained me. (b) The measure before my agency and the nature of my conflicting interest in the measure is as follows: , which (iN (,L'E"NT H~s RE"T4,Nl'D mE' 7<> As:SlS' j'" Prtnr-o:mlG,. /ON LD(' AfYlf'.JDiI1€NJ. if-lI-07 Slg~-~ Date Filed NOTICE: UNDER PROVISIONS OF FLORIDA STATUTES ~112.317, A FAILURE TO MAKE ANY REQUIRED DISCLOSURE CONSTITUTES GROUNDS FOR AND MAY BE PUNISHED BY ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING: IMPEACHMENT, REMOVAL OR SUSPENSION FROM OFFICE OR EMPLOYMENT, DEMOTION. REDUCTION IN SALARY, REPRIMAND, OR A CIVIL PENALTY NOT TO EXCEED $10,000. CE FORM 88. EFF. 1/2000 PAGE 2 "_. FORM 8B MEMORANDUM OF VOTING CONFLICT FOR COUNTY, MUNICIPAL, AND OTHER LOCAL PUBLIC OFFICERS LAST NAME-FIRST NAME-MIDDLE NAME NAME OF BOARD. COUNCIL, COMMISSION, AUTHORITY. OR COMMITTEE Of! C<J/(ef/- ~LA'/ ~. .[)E.eu:,p"'''NT SE<' VIC<,.s Aov, ~ot-y Cprr\fn i1TE6 MAILING ADDRESS THE BOARD, COUNCIL. COMMISSION, AUTHORITY OR COMMITTEE ON 8",' P,F7N Ave''''E SoL((" /.I if: .;;0 / VVl1ICH I SERVE IS A UNIT OF CITY COUNTY o CITY Jli COUNTY i:I OTHER LOCAL AGENCY N~ Plf'S FL 3<fIOd COLL/<:;,,- NAME OF POLl~~~ SUBDIVISION (' Ot.L ItO (L t>>S1Y DATE ON WHICH VOTE OCCURRED MY POSITION IS IIrl<-'L 1/ <9..D07 i:I ELECTIVE )( APPOINTIVE WHO MUST FILE FORM 88 This form is for use by any person serving at the county, city, or other local level of government on an appointed or elected board, council, commission, authority, or committee. It applies equally to members of advisory and non-advisory bodies who are presented with a voting conflict of interest under Section 112.3143, Florida Statutes. Your responsibilities under the law when faced with voting on a measure in which you have a conflict of interest will vary greatly depending on whether you hold an elective or appointive position. For this reason, please pay close attention to the instructions on this form before completing the reverse side and filing the form. INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 112.3143, FLORIDA STATUTES A person holding elective or appointive county, municipal, or other local public office MUST ABSTAIN from voting on a measure which inures to his or her special private gain or loss. Each elected or appointed local officer also is prohibited from knowingly voting on a mea~ sure which inures to the special gain or loss of a principal (other than a government agency) by whom he or she is retained (including the parent organization or subsidiary of a corporate principal by which he or she is retained); to the special private gain or loss of a relative; or to the special private gain or loss of a business associate, Commissioners of community redevelopment agencies under Sec. 163356 or 163.357, F,S., and officers of independent special tax districts elected on a one-acre, one-vote basis are not prohibited from voting in that capacity. For purposes of this law, a "relative" includes only the officer's father, mother, son, daughter, husband, wife, brother, sister, father-in-law, mother-in-law, son-in-law, and daughter-in-law. A "business associate" means any person or entity engaged in or carrying on a business enterprise with the officer as a partner, joint venturer, coowner of property, or corporate shareholder (where the shares of the corporation are not listed on any national or regional stock exchange). ELECTED OFFICERS: In addition to abstaining from voting in the situations described above, you must disclose the conflict: PRIOR TO THE VOTE BEING TAKEN by publicly stating to the assembly the nature of your interest in the measure on which you are abstaining from voting; and WITHIN 15 DAYS AFTER THE VOTE OCCURS by completing and filing thiS form with the person responsible for recording the min- utes of the meeting, who should incorporate the form in the minutes. APPOINTED OFFICERS: Although you must abstain from voting in the situations described above, you otherwise may participate in these matters. However, you must disclose the nature of the conflict before making any attempt to influence the decision, whether orally or in writing and whether made by you or at your direction. IF YOU INTEND TO MAKE ANY ATTEMPT TO INFLUENCE THE DECISION PRIOR TO THE MEETING AT WHICH THE VOTE WILL BE TAKEN . You must complete and file this form (before making any attempt to influence the decision) with the person responsible for recording the minutes of the meeting, who will incorporate the form in the minutes. (Continued on other side) CE FORM 8B - EFF. 1/2000 PAGE 1 APPOINTED OFFICERS (continued) A copy of the form must be provided immediately to the other members of the agency. The form must be read publicly at the next meeting after the form is filed. IF YOU MAKE NO ATTEMPT TO INFLUENCE THE DECISION EXCEPT BY DISCUSSION AT THE MEETING: You must disclose orally the nature of your conflict in the measure before participating. You must complete the form and file it within 15 days after the vote occurs with the person responsible for recording the minutes of the meeting, who must incorporate the form in the minutes. A copy of the form must be provided immediately to the other members of the agency, and the form must be read publicly at the next meeting after the form is filed. DISCLOSURE OF LOCAL OFFICER'S INTEREST I, LiA t C. 6I?.oo1<.eR. , hereby disclose that on IlP/?'L 1/ 2007 . , -' (a) A measure came or will come before my agency which (check one) inured to my special private gain or loss: inured to the special gain or loss of my business associate, inured to the special gain or loss of my relative, V inured to the special gain or loss of 7J./E ::I'NG.('S Amid 7tEU~T (Vt"l I,.JG.us) , by whom I am retained; or inured to the special gain or loss of is the parent organization or subsidiary of a principal which has retained me. (b) The measure before my agency and the nature of my conflicting interest in the measure is as follows , which /lJV CLIeNT !I~s ~ET~I"ED /YIE Foil IIDVI'!.e Co1JCEf-NIN<:<t A Pfr;("O= L!:J~ Jlm",..c",,,,,.rr W/lIOJl mAY AFF€tT /II" QUEt'''' ~ PfJ:oF~1'/. '/-//-01 Date Filed q~, Signature NOTICE UNDER PROVISIONS OF FLORIDA STATUTES ~112.317, A FAILURE TO MAKE ANY REQUIRED DISCLOSURE CONSTITUTES GROUNDS FOR AND MAY BE PUNISHED BY ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING IMPEACHMENT, REMOVAL OR SUSPENSION FROM OFFICE OR EMPLOYMENT, DEMOTION. REDUCTION IN SALARY, REPRIMAND. OR A CIVIL PENALTY NOT TO EXCEED $10,000 CE FORM 88 - EFF. 1/2000 PAGE 2