The URL can be used to link to this page

McDaniel - Ex Parte Ex parte Items - Commissioner William L. McDaniel, Jr. COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AGENDA MARCH 1, 2021 All information has been filed electronically with Minutes and Records ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS 2A This item requires that all participants be sworn in and ex parte disclosure be provided by Commission members. Recommendation to disclaim, renounce and vacate the County and the public interest in Gulf Shore Court, the 20-foot alley in Block "D" and a portion of Center Street, all part of the plat of Vanderbilt Beach Center, Plat Book 3, Page 16 of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida, as part of the application for the One Naples project. The subject Right-of-Ways are located in the northeast quadrant of the intersection of Gulf Shore Drive and Vanderbilt Beach Road in Section 32, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. (PL20200000368) (This is a companion to items 2.B, 2.C, and 3.A). NO DISCLOSURE FOR THIS ITEM ®Meetings ®Correspondence se-mails ®Calls Met with Developer and Developer's Attorney, met with Pelican Bay Property Owners Association, met with Save Vanderbilt Beach Group, met with Regatta at Vanderbilt Commons Association, visited the One Naples site, monitored the Planning Commission Meetings, had informal conversations with the protesters, many emails and calls from constituents. Ex parte Items - Commissioner William L. McDaniel, Jr. COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AGENDA MARCH 1, 2021 All information has been filed electronically with Minutes and Records 2C This item requires ex parte disclosure be provided by the Commission members. Should a hearing be held on this item, all participants are required to be sworn in. Recommendation to approve an Ordinance of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida amending Ordinance Number 2004-41, as amended, the Collier County Land Development Code, which established the comprehensive zoning regulations for the unincorporated area of Collier County, Florida, by amending the appropriate zoning atlas map or maps by changing the zoning classification of the herein described real property from a Commercial Intermediate district (C-3) zoning district to a Mixed Use Planned Unit Development (MPUD) zoning district for the project to be known as One Naples MPUD, to allow construction of up to 172 multi- family dwelling units, but no less than 40 residential units, up to 186 feet in actual height including a parking deck, and 10,000 square feet of C-3, commercial intermediate commercial uses, and a marina and a ship store. The subject property is located at the northeast corner of the intersection of Gulf Shore Drive and Vanderbilt Beach Road in Section 32, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, consisting of 5.42 ± acres; and by providing an effective date. (PL20190000697) [Coordinator: James Sabo, Comprehensive Planning Manager] (This is a companion to Items 2.A, 2.B, and 3.A). NO DISCLOSURE FOR THIS ITEM ®Meetings ®Correspondence ®e-mails ®Calls Met with Developer and Developer's Attorney, met with Pelican Bay Property Owners Association, met with Save Vanderbilt Beach Group, met with Regatta at Vanderbilt Commons Association, visited the One Naples site, monitored the Planning Commission Meetings, had informal conversations with the protesters, many emails and calls from constituents.. Ex parte Items - Commissioner William L. McDaniel, Jr. COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AGENDA MARCH 1, 2021 All information has been filed electronically with Minutes and Records CONSENT AGENDA NONE SUMMARY AGENDA - NONE District 1 District 2 $, 1 C-11 kl/ 1VL- E5 District 3 RECEIVED District d December 8, 2020 Dtatrict5 V DEC 10 2020 OFFICES OF COLLIER COUNTY Dear Commissioner William McDaniel, BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS I have owned 3 different condos on Vanderbilt Beach since 1988. 1 lived at the north end of Gulf Shore Drive for 12 years, moved to the Strand for 5 years, and have now been back on Vanderbilt Beach for the past 15 years. I have seen Naples grow and change incredibly. I believe Immokalee Road was just a 2 lane road in 1988, with no curbs all the way to I-75. When I first started coming down here it was difficult to find a restaurant in the area, especially if you couldn't have dinner until 8pm. The Pewter Mug was about it back then. I am not against change at all because progress is inevitable and necessary. I appreciate a lot of the development that has gone on but I don't agree with Naples One and what they are proposing. It just doesn't make sense tome to let them have the variances they're asking for and giving them permission to build such an immense project, with such tall buildings, so much density, and very little setback. I don't feel it's fair for them to compare their density and structure with other buildings on the same property that are only two and four stories high. A four story building with a larger setback doesn't have the same intrusion on the area as two 16 story buildings (including parking) with very little setback, and more buildings with 5 stories. They've also compared themselves to the Ritz Carlton which has a much bigger setback and plenty of trees and shrubbery that you hardly see the hotel from the street when you're walking on Vanderbilt Beach Road. They want to take up so much of the parcel with buildings that I'm afraid that flooding will be a huge problem. When we have heavy rains, the current vacant land where they want to build, has water sitting in it Where will the excess water go? We already have issues with our sewers not being able to handle the rains here. They say they're going to lengthen the drive up lane to the public parking garage but what they're proposing isn't even possible because the entrance to the Ritz Carlton is there. They say they're keeping the parking on the street but in their models they only show about 8 parking spaces as opposed to the current number of spaces on Vanderbilt Beach Road. My former husband is a developer in Chicago, both residential and commercial, so I've been exposed to meetings before the villages and their councilmen. Not all of them were positive but most resolved in giving open land back to the residents to enjoy. We built baseball and football fields for the communities, and we gave back land as preserves with lakes and fens. I know a lot of people want the parcel to have some sort of development, and that's understandable, but truthfully what is there doesn't bother me. It's part of our charm, dating back many years. 1 know Stock has a lot of money invested in this project but so do we as residents of the area. Now 1 hear that Stock is offering to do some improvements to some of the other condos in the project area in exchange for some of the residents to write letters to the councilmen saying they approve the project Developers with fat pockets assume they have the ability to get what they want They'll be setting a precedent for future building by being given these variances. No one in the Naples area wants us to start looking like Ft. Lauderdale or Miami. I don't agree with Stock, as they sternly warned us at the last meeting when they weren't getting the feedback they wanted, "be careful what you wish for, we'll build a commercial development and then you'll be sorry". If a commercial development was feasible then there would have been one built before now. They can still make money by cutting the project in half. The increase in traffic will be substantial. I drive Vanderbilt Beach Road to my volunteer job at Ave Maria University and during high season it has taken me 30 minutes to get from Gulf Shore Drive to Tamiami Trail. Imagine what it's going to be like if they increase the density like they're proposing! Please, just don't approve a project of this size. Don't give them the extreme variances they're asking for. Please listen to your constituents, the residents of Naples who are going to be most impacted. Sincerely, Anita Wilcheck Request regarding One Naples project hearing Frnrri dave@pritchard.cc Tin McDanielBill Recipients Bill.McDaniel@coIIieri::i-ii-ir-ityfl.gov EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. It is my understanding that one of the condo associations most affected by the One Naples project has received a tentative proposal from Stock Development offering several monetary "incentives" to the condo association if they agree to drop their opposition to the One Naples project. They must also agree to speak publicly in favor of One Naples, and write a supporting letter to the Board of Collier County Commissioners on Stock's behalf The package is very significant, estimated to be between $300,000 - $400,000. If this is true, it poses a significant conflict of interest because the motivation of such a condo association would not necessarily be what is in the best interest of the community, but rather what is in the best financial interest of the association. Therefore, I urge you to require that anyone testifying in writing or in person at the One Naples March Board of County Commissioners meeting disclose whether they, or the community association in which they live, have received any compensation from Stock Development, its affiliates or representatives and if so, the amount of such compensation. While such association has a right to voice its opinion on the project, such disclosure would allow you the full transparency to a significant motivating factor. Re-:pPctfully, Robert D Pritchard 141IF-1 '..'anderbilt Gulf_irie su bstg 1.0_3701000D. msg RE: Request regarding One Naples project hearing From McDanielBill To dave@pritchard.cc Recipients dave@pritchard.cc Mr. Pritchard, Thank you for your email regarding One Naples. I appreciate you contacting me to provide your input and express your thoughts. I carefully consider all information and comments when items are presented to the Board of County Commissioners. Again, thank you for giving me the opportunity to be of assistance to you. I value and appreciate the support as well as your participation in the government of our community. I am always available should you have any questions or concerns you want to discuss. W. L. McDaniel, Jr. Commissioner, District 5 3299 Tamiami Trail, East Naples, FL 34112 239-252-8605 WEB PAGE: From: dave@pritchard.cc <davepritchard.cc> Sent: Tuesday, December 29, 2020 11:07 AM To: McDanielBill <Bill.McDaniel@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: Request regarding One Maples project hearing EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. It is my understanding that one of the condo associations most affected by the One Naples project has received a tentative proposal from Stock Development offering several monetary "incentives" to the condo association if they agree to drop their opposition to the One Naples project. They must also agree to speak publicly in favor of One Naples, and write a supporting letter to the Board of Collier County Commissioners on Stock's behalf. The package is very significant, estimated to be between $300,000 - $400,000. If this is true, it poses a significant conflict of interest because the motivation of such a condo association would not necessarily be what is in the best interest of the community, but rather what is in the best financial interest of the association. Therefore, I urge you to require that anyone testifying in writing or in person at the One Naples March Board of County Commissioners meeting disclose whether they, or the community association in which they live, have received any compensation from Stock Development, its affiliates or representatives and if so, the amount of such compensation. While such association has a right to voice its opinion on the project, such disclosure would allow you the full transparency to a significant motivating factor. Respectfully, Robert D Pritchard 1405-1 Vanderbilt Gulfside image001.png image001.png t A CL h :Ahz en w Q C3 Mia I k CL Ir m 3- District t District 2— _ - RECEIVED District 3 February25, 2021 Istria - FEB 2 6 2021 District 8 OFFICES OF CULLIER COUNTY Dear Mr. McDaniel Jr. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS We the Board of Village Walk of Naples, representing 850 homeowners, would urge you not to agree to the request from Stock Development for variances at the March meeting. Please do not accept the Stock request for One Naples to exceed the allowable height, to diminish the allowable setbacks and to build something that is incompatible and inconsistent with the area. The number of proposed unit/occupants would have a negative effect on all the neighbors wishing to use the beach and enjoy the Vanderbilt Beach area. A building with 172 units, assuming 2 people per unit would in all likelihood result in 344 cars. We have yet to see anything re: parking allocation for homeowners, much less guests to accommodate these numbers. We agree with the idea of a residential use for the property, which is preferable to the commercial use for which it is now zoned. A smaller building, with proper setbacks and sufficient parking should be the only thing considered.A compromise acceptable to the County and the neighbors could and should be reached. We strongly urge you not to accept the One Naples project as it is currently proposed. Neil Blitz, President Susan Hoffman, Director Laurel Jura,Vice--President Mary Goddard, Director Diane Kelly, Director Tom Pitser, Treasurer Robert Roach,Director Jim Warren, Director Kathleen Adams, Secretary RECEIVED Fr:'D 19 2021 WStuart and Associates Planning & Design Services OFFICES COUNTY 239 - 677 - 6126 Greg@Stuarturbandesign.com BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONEN 7910 Summerlin Lakes Drive Fort Myers, FL 33907 _ 97 Riverfront Drive Cashmere, WA 988915 February 18, 2021 To: Madame Penny Taylor, Chairwoman Commissioner William- McDaniel, Vice-chairman Commissioner Rick LoCastro Commissioner Andy Solis, Esq. Commissioner Burt Saunder, Esq. From: Greg Stuart, MAURP District 1 _ . District 2 District 3 r District 4 District 5� D jLl V5� 96) RE: The 15 October SVB Evidence Book Transmittal -The One Naples MPUD Hearing For your convenience and consideration, I am transmitting to you the identical evidence book that was handed over to the Applicant, Collier Staff and the P & Z Commission. Though all of the materials are on the record and should be included in your upcoming agenda packet, the tabbed book format provides a more readily accessible means to evaluate the project for the 1 March hearing. In representing Save Vanderbilt Beach and addressing Commissioner McDaniels recent request to identify some of my clients objections to the project in lieu of a meeting, as a summary: 1. Doubling coastal high hazard density without appropriate hurricane evacuation mitigation is bad public policy; the 31.7 unit per acre density is far greater & not compatible with the neighborhoods 19.8 units per acre. 2. The project's high density drives parking demand which in turn underpins the the project's non - complementary and non -compatible city -block wide 35-ft tall parking garage (note, there is nothing like what is being proposed in SW Florida). 3. The project's high density drives the applicant's need for non -compatible 186-ft building height and 15-ft setback development standards; the neighborhood's average front yard setback is 49-ft and average building height is 7.4 stories. 4. The project's high density drives the applicant's need for zero functional common open space with a design that relies on a, by definition, non -permitted rooftop open space. 5. Asper the Applicant, the project's main benefit is a $350Kto $400Ktraffic light contribution, which can be easily funded by the County; the project's access and circulation plan impairs public vehicular and pedestrian safety and convenience. Respectively, Greg Stuart, MAURP GS/doc/20003/19Feb21_Stuart_evidencebookcoverietter.pgs ii�•�••uA•��ii• . T!i @ :IYO r Administrative Law Section Newsletter Volume XEK, No. 1 Dan R. Stengle &s Elizabeth W. McArthur, Co-editors September 1997 .,1�'.,Y_. J�.nzs -:. ..'.:�n�0ywrw.C..:it :!.:<-1FI"14£.. .Ai:-".J �4 -1LP' >•.�::2 i•-�T��iJ'i:._ ...:.'�:�L:. ..'. '..: ,�., _ ,�� .,, t .... Locai Administrative Law: All Plan Amendments are now Legislative Decisions by Ralf G. Brookes, Morgan &i Hendrick, Key West In March 1997, the Florida Su- preme Court held in Martin County u. Yusem, 22 FLW S156 (Fla. March 27, 1997) that all plan amendments are legislative, not quasi-judicial, decisions. In April 1997, the Third District Court of Appeals in Debes u. City of Key West, 22 FLW D827 (Fla. 3rd DCA April 2, 1997) reminded lo- cal governments that there must still be a rational basis for legislative plan amendments ... regardless of whether the quasi-judicial or legisla- tive test is applied. In the arena of local government, decisions in the field of administra- tive law are generally not subject to Florida's Administrative Procedures Act, F,lorida Statutes Chapter 120. In recent years, rezonings and compre- hensive plan amendments have be- come increasingly difficult for both From e chadIr 000 %Z_1__N Y our S-Jectiall Wants Youva-ve by Robert M. Rhodes, Chair This year offers our Section many continuing and new opportunities and challenges. I'll outline a few of our priorities. First, membership. We need to grow the section, increase member participation in section activities, and recruit the next generation of section leaders. Several new Execu- tive Council members joined us this year and they reflect the diversity of our membership — a strength that has enabled us to mold consensus po- sitions which are generally viewed as gftbalanced and objective. Nonetheless, all of our activities can benefit from increased member participation, par- ticularly those of you who have not served in the past. I encourage each of you to contact any section officer or Executive Council member if you wish to participate in section activ- ity. Elizabeth McArthur will chair the membership committee. Second, we will continue our pro- ductive CLE programs. Donna Blanton, CLE committee chair, and Mike Maida will spearhead a fall CLE program devoted to mediation in the administrative forum. Addi- tionally, we will consider programs addressing local government admin- istrative practice and a review and assessment of recent revisions to the local governments and administra- tive lawyers. Complex hearings are held before City and County Com- missions that are historically and politically more adept at making leg- islative, rather than quasi-judicial, decisions. Judicial review of these local decisions under Florida's Growth Management Act led to dif- fering District Court opinions and recent changes in the 50 year history continued, page 2 Administrative ProcedureAct. Later in the year we will start planning the next Administrative Law Conference continued, page 2 INSIDE: Case Notes, Cases Noted and Notable Cases ......................... 4 Minutes....................................... 9 Administrative Law Section Newsletter 'Volume SIX, No. 1 ® September 1997 FROM THE CHAIR from page 1 which will provide a useful forum for discussing and exchanging ideas to improve administrative law, practice, and procedure. The next Conference tentatively is scheduled for fall,1998. Third, we will amplify our efforts to establish a student administrative law writing contest. We hope this competition will be up and running this coming year. Also, with the lead- ership of Jim Rossi and Johnny Burris, we will establish a stronger working relationship with each state law school to promote and support L®CAI, ADMIMSTRATIVE LAW from ,page 1 of zoning law. But the Supreme Court in Yusem, and the Third District Court of Appeals in Debes, recently shed some new light into the murky waters of this increasingly -complex area of administrative law, and re- membered lessons of the past. With the advent of Florida's Growth Management Act in 1985, the zoning of property, previously treated as a purely "legislative" de- cision, must now survive an increas- ingly technical array of standards, criteria and different avenues of ju- dicial review. Legislative actions are reviewable under the fairly debat- able standard in an original action. Martin County v. Section 28 Partner- ship, Ltd., 676 So.2d 532 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996). The denial of a quasi-ju- dicial application is reviewable by teaching state administrative law. We'll also consider joining with one of the law schools to produce a na- tional forum on significant emerging administrative law issues. Fourth, our Public Utilities Com- mittee chaired by Doc Hortonwill work on a forum that will address from various perspectives deregula- tion of electric utilities. This should be a timely and provocative session that will bring together public,' pri- vate, and citizen views on this impor- tant public policy issue. Fifth, we will publish our regular newsletter and Bar Journal column. Dave Watkins and Seann Frazier will chair these efforts. ' Finally, we will maintain the Section's active involvement in the development of administrative law policy and practice. We will continue to work` with legislative staff and04 committees on possible fiuvther revi- sions to the A.PA- We will assess the effects of recent APA revisions and the recently adopted Uniform Rules of Procedure. We will offer our assis- tance to the Constitutional Revision Commission. Past chairs Linda Rigot and Bill Williams will lead these en- deavors. In.all, we have another challenge - filled year, and I encourage those of you who have not actively partici- pated in your Section, to become in- volved. Join us. Let us hear from you. ««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««< petition for writ of certiorari, if you are the applicant. Section 28 Partner- ship, Ltd. v. Martin County, 642 So.2d 609 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994). If you are an affected citizen alleging that an action is inconsistent with the com- prehensive plan, judicial review is available solely in an original action under Florida Statutes §163.3215. Although ultimately subject to ju- dicial review, it is the local govern- ments that must initially decide whether an action is legislative or quasi-judicial because each type of action has its own procedures, stan- dards and methods of review. See, Board of County Commissioners' of Brevard County a Snyder, 627 So.2d 469 (Fla. 1993); Jennings v. Dade County, 589 So.2d 1337 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1991), review denied, 598 So.2d 75 This newsletteris prepared and published by theAdministrative Law Section of`I'hemorida Bar. RobertM. Rhodes, Tallahassee............................................................................... Chair M. Catherine Lannon, Tallahassee ............. .............................. ............. Chair -elect Mary R Smallwood,Tallahassee ............................................................. Treasurer Dan R. Stengle, Tallahassee ........................... .... .. .. Secretary Elizabeth W. McArthur, Tallahassee ......................... ....... ........... Co-editor ...... ...... .... Dan R. Stengle,Tallahassee.............................................................................. Co-editor Jaelde Werndli, Tallahassee .............................. ............. ProgramAdministrator Lynn M. Brady, Tallahassee........................................................................... Layout Statements or expressions of opinion or comments appearing herein are those of the edi- tors and contributors and not of The Florida Bar or the Section. (Fla.1992). To make this determina- tion, the Florida Supreme Court re- E quired local governments to conduct a functional analysis of each appli- cation. Actions which result in the "formulation" of a general rule of (' policy are legislative. But actions which result in the "application" of a general rule of policy are quasi-judi- cial. Snyder. From Snyder (in 1993) until now, this functionalanalyses was applied to both rezonings and plan amendments on a case -by -case basis. Plan amendments or rezonings; could be either quasi-judicial or leg- islative. And every case required analyses. But in Yusem, the Supreme Court restoi ed a bit of common sense to the process and held that amending a plan was just like adopting an origi- nal plan. A plan amendment was leg- islative because it involved the for- mulation of a general rule of policy, regardless of the size of the parcel or number of people affected. All plan amendments are legislative. Martin County v. Yusem, 22=FLW S156 (Fla. March 27,1997). The Supreme Court i also confirmed that judicial review of a plan amendment, alegislative act, is available in an original action filed j in circuit court. Yusem, citing Hirt u Polk County Board of County Com- missioners, 578 So.2d 415, 416 (Fla x 2d DCA 1991). Although all plan amendments 2 Volume XIX, No. 1 e September 1997 Administrative Law Section Newsletter are conclusively legislative, the func- tional analyses must still be applied to rezonings. Comprehensive rezonings that affect a large area or portion of the public are legislative determinations subject to the fairly debatable standard of review. But rezonings that affect a limited area or number of persons are quasi-judi- cial decisions, subject to a higher de- gree of scrutiny under the two prong test set forth in Snyder. In a quasi- judicial rezoning, the applicant has the burden of proving that the appli- cation is consistent with the compre- hensive plan and complies with pro- cedural requirements. Once this burden is met, the burden shifts to local government to demonstrate a valid, legitimate public purpose for maintaining the existing designa- tion. Snyder at 474-476. This sounds simple enough. Plan amendments are legislative. Rezonings require functional analy- ses. But what if applications for a plan amendment and rezoning are filed at the same time? The District Court cases that arose in Snyder's wake often considered applications that combined rezonings with plan amendments, and the reviewing Courts failed to make a distinction between the two applications, fur- ther leading to the confusion. These dual applications were pro- cessed at the same time in order to reduce the extraordinary amount of time needed to proceed on a plan amendment and then a subsequent rezoning under Florida's Growth Management Act, Florida Statutes §§ 163.3184 and 163.3187. Proposed plan amendments must first be transmitted to various state agencies including the Department of Com- munityAffairs. Only after review can an amendment be adopted and must be submitted to DCA once again for a second compliance review under the Growth Management Act. Florida Statutes §163.3184. Gener- ally, larger -scale plan amendments can only be adopted twice per year, but smaller scale amendments af- fecting less than 10 acres can be sub- mitted more frequently. Florida Stat- ute §163.3187. Rezonings can be accomplished more quickly and fre- quently. But rezonings must still be in compliance with each and every element of the comprehensive plan, i.e., frequently necessitating the si- multaneous plan amendment. Because different standards apply to legislative plan amendments and rezonings, it would be easier to de- fend decisions in which plan amend- ments are heard first, in a separate hearing prior to the rezoning. All to frequently, a plan amendment and a rezoning application are heard to- gether in one hearing, usually at the request of an eager applicant whose project awaits approval. The best strategy, in light of Yusem, is to de- cide the legislative plan amendment first. Even if both hearings occur at the same meeting. The first decision, a legislative plan amendment, is easier to uphold. In most cases, the legislative decision on the plan amendment will form the basis for a quasi-judicial decision on the under- lying rezoning application. Only then should the hearing on the quasi-ju- dicial rezoning application be heard. A separate hearing meeting the sub- stantive and procedural require- ments of Snyder can then be con- vened. Remember, even a quasi-judicial rezoning application that is consis- tent with the plan or adopted plan amendment can be denied if a legiti- mate public purpose exists to keep the existing zoning in place under the second prong of the test set forth in Snyder. Snyder at 476. Does this "legitimate public purpose" standard closely parallel the "fairly debatable"or "rational basis" test applied to purely legislative deci- sions? And in the end, is there any real, practical difference? The Su- preme Court reminded us in Snyder (1993), and again in Yusem (1997), that a "land use plan must be based on adequate data and analysis in providing for gradual and ordered growth in the future use of land." Even legislative plan amendments must still have a rational basis that is supported by competent, substan- tial evidence. That is the underlying constitutional basis for all modern zoning and growth management sys- tems. We must not forget the historical, constitutional basis for zoning estab- lished in Euclid v. Ambler, 272 US. 365 (1926). It is worth remembering that only on a motion for rehearing in Euclid was the United States Su- preme Court persuaded to change its collective mind and hold zoning con- stitutional. Land Use, Callies and Freilich, West Publishing (1986), p. 47, note 9. Since the Euclid decision in-1926, zoning has become a part of almost all local government codes. It is also in Euclid that the "fairly de- batable" standard was first enunci- ated in the context of zoning; "if the validity of the legislative classifica- tion for zoning purposes be fairly debatable, the legislative judgment must be allowed to control." The Euclid court also discussed in detail many public purposes that formed the rational basis for zoning districts limiting the allowable uses of land. Two years after Euclid, United States Supreme Court again exam- ined a residentially -zoned parcel ad- joining established industrial uses. The Court held that the line of sepa- ration between the residential and industrial district, which transected an existing commercial building, was unconstitutional because it lacked a rational basis. Nectow v. City of Cam- bridge, 277 US.183 (1928). The zon- ing district was not supported by a fairly debatable rational basis. Usu- ally, the rational basis, or lack of a rational basis, can be found by look- ing at a map of the surrounding uses and asking a simple question: "Does it make sense?" (see, Nectow, zoning map, included in the opinion). After nearly 50 years of zoning decisions and growth management legislation, the Third District re- cently brought us back to earth. In Debes, theThird District reversed the denial of even a "legislative" plan amendment (from Residential to Commercial) because it resulted in "discriminatory spot zoning — or, in this context, spot planning — in re- verse." Under the Court's analysis even a legislative decision must have some rational basis supported by competent, substantial evidence, es- pecially in cases that raise the old specter of "spot zoning," or the cre- ation of small zoning islands or pock- ets unsupported by any rational ba- sis. The City's stated reasons for maintaining the residential zoning in Debes lacked both a rational basis and could not be supported by com- petent, substantial evidence. The Court found that the City's general - continued... 3 Administrative Law Section Newsletter Volume SIX, No.1 a September 1997 LOCAL ADMINISTRATIVE LAW from page 3 ized concerns about additional traf- fic that would be generated by com- mercial uses was insufficient to re- tain residential spot zoning. Traffic concurrency and levels of service were properly considered during site plan review once a specific project was proposed. In addition, the City's desire to, build affordable housing on the privately -held parcel was also an insufficient basis to deny the appli- cation. The plan amendment or re- zoning application should be consid- ered "without regard to the one particular use which the owner might then intend to make of the various uses permitted under a proper zoning category" Debes, citing Porpoise Point Partnership v. St. John's County, 470 So.2d 850 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985). Affordable housing, although desirable, could have sup- ported condemnation for that use, but "emphatically may not be pro- moted on the back of a private prop- erty owner ..." Even the "fairly debatable" test applied to legislative acts, could not In a key land use law case, the Florida Supreme Court in Martin County v. Yusem, 22 Fla. L. Weekly S156 (Fla. Sup. Ct., March 27,1997), took out its bright line marker and answered in the negative the follow - mg question certified by the Fourth DCA as being of great public impor- tance: Can a rezoning decision which has limited impact underSnyder but does require an amendment of the comprehensive land use plan still be a quasi-judicial decision subject to strict scrutiny review? . The Snyder case referenced in the certified question is Board of County Commissioners rz Snyder, 627 So 2d 469 (Fla.1993), in which the Florida Supreme Court had held that rezon- ing actions that have a limited im- rescue the City from what the Dis- trict Court called a decision that "so fundamentally and seriously departs from the controlling law that a mis- carriage of justice has resulted ..." The Court noted that regardless of whether the decision was character- ized as legislative or quasi-judicial, the decision to deny the request could not be upheld under any test. "As we suspect is very often the case, the application of any possible for- mulation of the showing necessary either to support or to overturn a'lo- cal government's decision of the present kind, including the "fairly debatable" standard deemed appro- priate in Martin County v. Yusem ... would yield the same result." Debes, 22 FLW at D828, n.4. (emphasis added). Local governments must not only determine whether a rezoning apph- cation is consistent with each and every element, policy and objective in the Comprehensive Plan under Snyder and Machado v. Musgrove, 519 So.2d 629, 635 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1987), there must be a rational basis to support the designation and the district's boundaries. Euclid Nectow. Without a fairly -debatable, rational relationship to the health, safety or by Elizabeth McArthur pact on the public and that can be seen as policy applications rather than policy setting, are quasi-judicial decisions. The Snyder decision sug- gested that'a functional test was to be applied to determine whether the impact of the -action' is limited, look- ing at such factors as whether the parcel of land at issue was owned by only one person. That was the situa- tion presented in the Yusem case, in- volving one 54-acre parcel owned by one person for which a density rezon- ing and comprehensive plan amend- ment were sought. However, in Yusem, the Court re- ceded from any notion that a func- tional test could be applied to deter- mine that a rezoning decision had limited impact and was therefore morals of the community and compe- tent, substantial evidence to support the rational basis and district bound- ary, the Third District held that the zoning designation "is based on no more than the fact that those who support it have the power to work their will."Debes. The United States Supreme Court stated in 1926'that such an ordinance "passes the bounds of reason and assumes the character of a merely arbitrary fiat." Euclid v.Ambler,272 US. 365 (1926). Although the early Supreme Court cases of Euclid and Nectow were not cited inYusem orDebes they should not be forgotten by local gov- ernments or local administrative law practitioners. Although many state and regional land use schemes have been adopted' in the 50 years since these early cases, a rational basis supported by competent, substantial evidence is still required for all mod- em comprehensive plans and zoning designations. ' E.g., Hawaii's state Iand use act, Oregon's and Florida's Growth Management Act and the Tahoe Regional Planning Act, which was the subject of a recent United States Supreme Court opinion in Suitim V. Tahoe regional Planning Council, Slip Op. 96- 243 (May 27,1997). ED quasi-judicial, where the rezoning request also requires a comprehen- sive plan amendment. As the Court held, "While we continue to adhere to our analysis in Snyder -with respect to the types of rezonings at issue in that case, we do not extend that analysis or endorse a functional, fact intensive approach to determining whether amendments to local com- prehensive land use plans are legis- lative decisions. Rather, we expressly conclude that amendments to com- prehensive land use plans are legis- lative' decisions." 22 Fla. L. Weekly at 5158. As legislative decisions, com- prehensive land use plan amend- ment decisions are subject to the fairly debatable standard of review, which, as the Court reminded`is a STUARTANDASSOCIATES Planning & Design Services 12/01/20 REVISED EXHIBIT LIST CASE _ THE ONE NAPLES GMP MAP AMENDMENT, MUPD REZONING & STREET VACATION PREPARED FOR _ SAVE VANDERBILT BEACH Exhibit One _ Greg Stuart, MAURP Qualifications and Experience - Resume Exhibit Two _ The One Naples Site Highest & Best Use - Applicant's Alternative 100,000 SF Retail Is Nonsense, Is Not Feasible & Is Not Highest and Best Use Exhibit Three _ The Adjacent Neighborhood Density Building Height & Setbacks Exhibit For Neighborhood Complementary and Compatibility Analysis - Neighborhood Average Density @ 19.8 per ac., Ave. Height @ 7.4 Stories & Ave. Setback @ 49-ft. Exhibit Four _ A Complementary and Compatibility Assessment Between Site C-3 Zoning and Proposed MUPD - Existing C-3 Zoning More Compatible Than One Naples Exhibit Five _ Regulatory Framework & Key Collier County Rules and Definitions For Approval - One Naples Open Space & Character Do Not Meet County Rules & Definitions Exhibit Six _ The One Naples Collier County Growth Management Plan Internal Consistency Assessment - One Naples Not Consistent w./23 Land Use, Transportation & Coastal Management Goals, Objectives and Policies Exhibit Seven _ Street Vacation Value and Applicant Benefit Assessment - Public Street Vacation Grants $6.31VIM to $7.4MM Special Benefit To Applicant Exhibit Eight _ Part One The One Naples Plan Amendment & Rezoning - The One Naples Presentation and Factual Basis For Project Denial Exhibit Nine _ Part Two Required Compatibility Standards and Polices - The Save Vanderbilt Beach Alternative Design Standards For Compatible Development Exhibit Ten _ The Staff 25-ft with Optional 15-ft Staff Vanderbilt Bch Rd./Gulf Shore Dr. Setback Condition - Facts Supporting The Optional 15-ft Standard As Functionally Appropriate 5 Dec P & Z Supplemental Exhibits: Exhibit 11 _ The 30 October Pelican Bay Foundation Letter Opposing The Use Of The Pelican Bay PUD For Building Height and Density - Jim Hoppensteadt, Pres. & COO STUARTANDASSOCIATES Planning & Design Services 12/30/20 5 Items That Demonstrate A Failure To Provide Mandated and Relevant Discretionary Information As Per Collier County Land Development and Administrative Codes 1. Hurricane Evacuation Mitigation Plan (mandatory): FINDING -The Applicant fails to provide for required hurricane evacuation mitigation while doubling density in Collier County's Coastal High Hazard zone. - Rule: Coastal Management GM Policy 12.1.2: - "Land use plan amendments in the Category 1 hurricane vulnerability zone shall only be considered if such increases in densities provide appropriate mitigation to reduce the impacts of hurricane evacuation times." - FACT _ One Naples's 174 cots is hurricane shelter mitigation, not evacuation time mitigation; the application is not consistent with 12.1.2. - FACT _ Collier Staff requires One Naples to provide 174 cots and an enclosed utility trailer; cots and a trailer cannot be, by definition, evacuation mitigation; cots and a trailer are shelter requirements. - FACT _ The request doubles density in a coastal high hazard zone and is required to provide evacuation mitigation; this fact leads to GMP internal inconsistent problems in violation of FSS 163.1772(2). • COMMENT _ By not providing for explicitly mandated evacuation mitigation, it is not logical for Staff to conclude that the project complies with the Collier County Growth Management Plan. • COMMENT _ 174 cots and an enclosed utility trailer present a value of $36.3K; the County's One Naples 0.79 acre ROW vacation grants the applicant an estimated benefit value between $6.3MM to $7.4MM. Page 1 of 7 STUARTANDASSOCIATES Planning & Design Services 12/30/20 2. Demonstration of Adequate Open Space (mandatory): FINDING _ The Applicant fails to demonstrate 30% Open Space adequacy. - Rule: Open Space Dimensional Standard LDC 4.02.01: "In developments of commercial, industrial and mixed use including residential, at least 30% of the gross area shall be devoted to usable open space." Rule: Open Space Pre -application Meeting LDC 10 02 13 B 1 e and Open Space Planning_ Commission Hearing and Recommendation LDC 10.02.13.B.5.e: e "The adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the development." - FACT _ One Naples has not demonstrated that the MCP provides for 30% open space. The project's Exhibit B Development Standards table does not include total project open space standards, the Exhibit C MCP does not include a total project open space table, and the Exhibit E Deviations does not request an open space deviation. • COMMENT _ It is logically impossible to demonstrate adequacy of project open space without a project open space table and/or related data. - FACT _ The Code requires demonstration of open space adequacy at the zoning stage, not at the final site development plan stage; the MCP is out of compliance with Collier rules 4.02.01 and 10.02.13.B.5.e. - FACT _ One Naples original application included a deviation to use roof top private recreational open space at a maximum 15%; the deviation request was withdrawn. - FACT _ Rooftops used to meet regulatory open space require a deviation as per Open Space definition (see below); One Naples roof top open space is on areas occupied by buildings and is not permissible, • CODE DEFINITION _ LDC 1.08.02 Open space: "Areas that are not occupied by buildings, impervious parking areas, streets, driveways or loading areas and which may be equipped or developed with amenities designed to encourage the use and enjoyment of the space either privately or by the general public." Page 2 of 7 STUARTANDASSOCIATES Planning & Design Services 12/30/20 3. Architectural Elevations w./Cross-sections (discretionary): FINDING _ The Applicant fails to provide actual and scalable Architectural Elevations w./Street Cross -sections; this fact directly impacts a professional assessment of One Naples neighborhood compatibility; the Applicant's 3-D Renderings are non -binding illustrations. - Rule: LDC 10.02.13 A-F: 35. "When determined necessary to adequately assess the compatibility of proposed uses to existing or other proposed uses, relationship to open space, recreation facilities, or traffic impacts, or to assess requests for reductions in dimensional standards, the Planning & Zoning Division Director may request schematic architectural drawings (floor plans, elevations, perspectives) for all proposed structures and improvements, as appropriate." - Rule: Collier Administrative Code Sec. GA PUD Master Plan Contents: "Pursuant to LDC subsection 10.02.13 A, the MPUD Master Plan will graphically illustrate the development strategy, using The Community Character Plan For Collier County, Florida (April 2001) as a guide for development and redevelopment." FACT _ The Applicant has limited its application to submitting unscaled and unmeasurable architectural perspective renderings that are not tied to any development commitment(s) in the MPUD Ordinance, Exhibit A PUD Uses, Exhibit B MPUD Development Standards, and Exhibit CA (see Staff Attachment A BOCC Packet); the One Stock Architectural graphics are non -binding illustrations. COMMENT _ It is difficult if not impossible to make a logical determination whether a project has compatible and complementary architectural setbacks, height, scale and mass without measurable architectural elevations and cross sections. Unscaled and unmeasurable 3-D drawings do not offer best professional practices when determining development neighborhood fit and compatibility. FACT _ The PUD Master Plan exhibit does not illustrate the Community Character Plan development strategy, as is mandated by 10.02.13.A; the application is out of compliance with Collier rule 10.02.13.A. Page 3 of 7 STUARTANDASSOCIATES Planning & Design Services 12/30/20 4. Traffic _ Southbay Drive Connection Separation Reduction, and Safe Ingress and Egress (mandatory): FINDING _ The Applicant fails to provide neighborhood driving safety analysis and conform to best transportation planning practices since the project reduces Southbay Drive connection separation spacing by 215-ft +/ while introducing a new, 4th leg, eastbound movement at the congested parking garage intersection now aligned at the project's primary gateway. The Application fails to meet its density entitlement criteria. - Rule: LDC Residential Density & Traffic 4.07.02.B.3a&b: "The BCC may lessen density or intensity of development when it has been determined that development to the maximum density or intensity permissible in this section would: a. Create inconvenient or unsafe access to the PUD; or b. Create traffic congestion in the streets which adjoin or lead to the PUD" - Rule: Transportation Objective 7: "Develop and adopt standards for safe and efficient ingress and egress to adjoining properties, and encourage safe and convenient on -site traffic circulation through the development review process." - FACT _ One Naples reduces Southbay Drive intersection connection separation from 565-ft. +/- to 350-ft +/-; sound transportation planning and design employs increasing and not decreasing intersection connection spacing. - FACT _ A noteworthy reduction to intersection connection spacing reduces driver response time, which directly and negatively impacts public traveling safety; this issue is completely ignored by applicant and staff. - FACT _ One Naples introduces a new project southbound left -out turning movement towards US 41. This new fourth leg turning movement at the already problematic public parking garage intersection will conflict with existing turning movements into and out of the parking garage (see next page graphic). - FACT _ The Applicant and Staff did not analyze public safety impacts from combining Southbay Dr intersection separation reduction with the new"4th leg" parking garage; the application is out of compliance with Collier rule 4.07.02.B. 3.a & 3.b and fails to meet density entitlement standards. Page 4 of 7 STUARTANDASSOCIATES Planning & Design Services 12/30/20 A 565-ft +/- Southbay Dr Connection Separation & A "3-leg" Parking Garage Intersection. ''�"°"�� EXISTING I' 'shot: fbour?. f Existing ; 3 Log Existing _ 3 Log on Existin .� 4 Log 1 i A 350-ft +/- Southbay Dr Connection Separation & A "4-leg" Parking Garage Intersection. . Project Creates New East Bound Left -out Turning Conflicts PROPOSED Bound Into Garage Turning Movements While Reducing Intersection Connection Separation Non -examined Impacts: Existing Southbay Dr. New Turning Movement 4 Leg Intersection _ w./Parking Garage • _.t,� Conflicts Combined w./215-ft. Spacing Reduction Alternative Restricted Project Gateway VBR Access & Continuous VBR Pathway Not Analyzed; Underscores 4.07.02.13 Failure Re. Inconvenient Site Access and Traffic Congestion Rule. LIMITED VBR PROJECT GATEWAY ACCESS & + CONTINUOUS PEDESTRIAN..........••...' ' t PATHWAY ALTERNATIVES=_ FOR VEHICULAR & PEDESTRIAN SAFETY ter Y 25-ft. Tall • r ,L n ic LDC 4.02.38 23-ft. Wide Mixed Use Pathway Improves Neighborhood Vehicular Circulation _Regatta, Barefoot Pelican, Others w./New Round -about Route Option For Eastbound Movement Improves Neighborhood Pedestrian Circulation _ A Continuous Mixed -Use Pathway Designed At The Human Scale It is not logical for finding that One Naples does not "create inconvenient or unsafe access", and "create traffic congestion in the streets which adjoin or lead to the PUD" without analyzing the 215-ft. intersection spacing reduction combined with introducing the new "4th Leg" at the already problematic parking garage intersection. Page 5 of 7 STUARTANDASSOCIATES Planning & Design Services 12/30/20 5. PUD Master Concept Plan Required Elements (mandatory): FINDING _ The Applicant fails to provide required drainage, open space and marina information on the Master Concept Plan; the project does not comply with Rule G.1. - Rule: Administrative Code G.1 Rezoning To A PUD Master Plan Contents "Boundaries and dimensions of all proposed tracts or increments with an indication of the proposed land use category, including but not limited to: - Lakes and/or other water management facilities; - Common open space; and - Marina upland uses including underground fuel storage area and spill containment area, ships store, parking and circulation, and service areas". FACT _ The Applicant's Master Concept Plan Ex. C does not depict surface water management areas and common open space areas; the application does not comply with the Code. • COMMENT _ Common open space areas are to reduce appearance of density and to provide for functional uses; One Naples requires common open space to reduce intensity & appearance. • COMMENT _ Applicant and Staff failure to specifically identify common open space, as required by Code, further aggravates project neighborhood complementary and compatibility issues. FACT _ One Naples proposes up to a 99 slip marina, which is larger than the 84 slip Naples City Dock, without providing any substantial information such as: Location of underground fuel storage and fuel containment area. Location of marina parking and circulation area(s). Location of marina service and loading areas. COMMENT _ The Application fails to comply with the Collier Code. FACT _ The One Naples MPUD Ordinance, Exhibit A PUD Uses, Exhibit B MPUD Development Standards and Exhibit C.1 permits by right a back -bay marina restaurant without any outdoor noise, light and amplified music compatibility and nuisance conditions. FACT _ The application and MPUD ordinance does not provide for any Florida Clean Marina Program standards; this failure reflects a complete lack of marina data and analysis. Page 6 of 7 STUARTANDASSOCIATES Planning & Design Services 12/30/20 EXAMPLE COLLIER REVIEW PROCESS & ONE NAPLES INFORMATION SUFFICIENCY REQUEST RESPONSE Re. ARCHITECTURE James Sabo. AICR Principal Planner Re: One Naples PUDZ (PL-20190000697) HAI File No.: 2016.025 May 29. 2020 Page 8 information such as other project history or studies to support this statement. Response: This coatnuent has been addressed. All of the revisedSynchro aualvses have been provided to the rerlewer. 13. Please detail the method for calculating the results found in the Percent hmproved vs Existing column of the Vanderbilt Beach Road Operational Analysis Results table. The table footnote states that this was determined based on a comparison between the westbound weekend queues at Gulf Shore Dr. However. calculating the percent change when comparing the 1.765-value listed in the table for the westbound queue from Scenario 1 B to the 1.631 listed for the westbound queue in Scenario 2 results in all improvement of 8% instead of the listed 25. Comparing the 1.765 from Scenario I to the 595 for Scenario 3 results in all improvement of 66% instead of the 73% listed in the table. If the fitll queue value of 1,917 from the Synchro analysis is used instead of the 1.765 shown in the table. the numbers still do not match. In that case comparing 1,917 (adjusted per Synchro output) from Scenario 113 to 1.631 front Scenario 2 results in 15%. Comparing 1.917 (adjusted per Synchro output) from Scenario 113 to 595 from Scenario 3 results in 69%. These still do not match the percent improvement values of 2510 and 7396 presented in the table. Response: The total westbound queue is not 1, 765 feet. As anentioned ill footnote No. I of the first table, the rvestbounnd queue is bgond the I BR/f'anderbilt Drive intersection. Therefore, the total queue is 1,76c feet plus 422 feet (IiB queue at I BRIVanderbill Dr intersection) or 2,187 feet. The linprovenneut percentages were then calculated based oil the coutparlsou to the total westbound queue of 2,187 feet. See revised footnotes out Vanderbilt Beach Road Operational Anahysis Results tables located in the Appendix B. ZONING REVIEW- JA.NIES SABO 11. At the March 3rd NIM. a commitment was made to provide renderings of the size and dimensions of the proposed buildings. Provide renderings of the proposed buildings showing dimensions. Response: This is not a "saffieiencp" issue. COMMENT _ Though the Applicant commits to providing accurately sized and dimensioned Towers and buildings to the public, the applicant does not provide the very same scaled architectural design information needed to determine neighborhood complementary "fit" and compatibility. Page 7 of 7 STUARTANDASSOCIATES Planning & Design Services Exhibit One Greg Stuart Expert Testimony Qualifications and Experience Case _ The One Naples GMP Map Amendment, MUPD Rezoning & Street Vacation Greg Stuart, MAURP LAND PLANNER/URBAN DESIGN PRINCIPAL Professional Expertise in Comprehensive Land Use Planning, Urban Design, Land Development Entitlements, Project Management, Expert Planning Testimony and Real Estate Investment and Development PROFILE Mr. Stuart is a highly experienced professional land use planner & executive with over three + decades of experience and success in urban & regional planning, land development & finance, entitlements, regulatory development, governmental relations and communications. EXPERIENCE VP, Stuart and Marquez, Gainesville/Jacksonville, FL 1984 — 1990 Director of Planning, Hole Mantes & Ass, Fort Myers, FL 1990 - 1992 President, Stuart and Associates, Fort Myers, FL 1993 - current Senior Principal, Eagle Real Estate, Cape Coral, FL 1998 - 2008 Senior Principal, Southland Group, Bonita Springs, FL 2009 — 2011 Senior Associates, RW Thorpe & Associates, Mercer Island, WA 2016 Comprehensive Land Use Planning, Zoning & Sector Planning Broad experience in growth management, governmental relations, land use analysis, long range planning and regulatory implementation. Notable accomplishments include the Bonita Springs 5200 ac. Sector Plan, the Matlacha SF Residential Overlay, the 2015 Pine Island Plan Restudy & TUD Ordinance, and Lee Co. Comprehensive Plan oversight via 10-year Local Planning Agency member (5 yr. Chairman). Administration and Business Management Noted for team -oriented business management methods; expertise in budgets, finance, strategic planning, governmental relations, public communications, contracts and negotiations. Business background gained from owning and/or being a senior partner for 4 profitable consulting & real estate development/investment practices. Urban Design, Entitlements and Public Communications Highly recognized for consensus oriented public and agency permitting implementation (80 + cases), environmental design, local, state & federal entitlements and project implementation. Notable examples include the Suwannee Trails Camp Resort, Treehouse Village, Judd Creek Preserve PD, Bonita Springs Home Depot & Heritage Cove RPD. Land Development, Project Management & Real Estate Successful track record in land development, including acquisition, financial analysis & project management; notable $236MM 20-month concurrent design, permitting and construction for 3 FL marinas. Professional Planning Expert Testimony Mr. Stuart is an acknowledged leading expert in Land Use Planning, Condemnation and Inverse Condemnation, with over 130 Judicial & Quasi-judicial cases; successfully defended Lee County in a $74MM inverse condemnation mine case. ACADEMIC BACKGROUND AND CREDENTIALS 7910 Summerlin Lakes Dr. Fort Myers, FL 33907 97 Riverfront Drive Cashmere, WA 98815 C 239.677.6126 Greg@Stuarturbandesign.com www.Stuarturbandesign.com QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERTISE Comprehensive Land Use Planning Planning, Zoning and Growth Management Land Use and Market Feasibility Analysis Site Planning, Urban Design and & Environmental Design Local, State and Federal Land Development Permitting & Entitlements Land Development & Marina Development Project Management Real Estate Investment, Finance and Underwriting Governmental Relations and Public Communications Danish Academy of Fine Arts, College of Architecture & Urban Design; Post -graduate Fellow University of Florida, Masters of Arts in Urban & Regional Planning, full HUD Scholarship University of Florida, Bachelor of Arts in Urban Studies, Magna Cum Laude • Awarded HUD Planning Fellowship for Full Graduate Studies, University of Florida • Awarded Denmark International Studies Fellowship, University of Copenhagen • Awarded Graduate Design Fellowship, Danish Academy of Arts Expert Testimony PROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS Fort Myers Board of Realtors, Associate American Planning Association, Associate Urban Land Institute, Associate 2 Greg Stuart, MAURP SUMMARY Mr. Stuart is a highly experienced urban planner and designer, with experience gained from two professional consulting practices an( a senior Principal in 2 real estate investment and brokerage firms. With extensive expertise in land development, business management and public communications, his expertise includes urban design, land use planning, land development permitting, project management and expert testimony. Earning a B.A in Urban Studies (High Honors), a M.A. in Urban & Regional Planning from the University of Florida, and a Fellowship at the Danish Royal Academy, Mr. Stuart has extensive legislative, quasi-judicial and growth management case experience throughout Florida and Washington State. QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERIENCE Mr. Stuart's professional experience spans thirty plus years of local, regional and international professional business and consulting. Mr. REPRESENTATIVE Stuart has directed land use planning, design, permitting and project management tasks for public and private sector interests, has been the CLIENT LIST Principal Planner or Project Manager for more than 80 major development projects throughout FL, GA and WA, and has provided The Geo Group, Inc. expert testimony for over 130 quasi-judicial & judicial cases. Sakata Seed Of North America Comprehensive Land Use Planning and Sector Planning Davis Wright Tremaine Mr. Stuart has designed and directed scores of land use planning projects, such as the mixed -use 196-ac. Judd Creek Preserve Stephans & Klinge, LLP residential projects (Cape Coral FL 2003-2006), recreational vehicle resorts (Director of Development, the Suwannee Trails Camp Resort (a City of Vero Beach 2800-acre 6-mile riverfront DR], 1985-88), and institutional mixed use Lee County, FL projects (Project Manager/Principal Planner for the 6,400-ac. Pine Creek Ranch and FGCU Charlotte County Campus 2004-08). Public Town of Fort Myers Beach, FL sector comprehensive planning includes directing/designing the Bonita Springs 5200 ac. NE Quadrant Sector Plan, various EAR and Lee Plan Ingman Marine amendments, NW Cape Coral & 7 Island Plan (2014), the 2015 Pine Tibbetts Lumber Island Plan Restudy & TDU Ordinance revision, & the Matlacha SF Residential Overlay ordinance. As a Lee County Planning Lennar US Homes Commissioner (1992-02; 5 yr. Chairman) under his leadership, the Home Depot Corp. County adopted new rules for commercial architectural design, upgraded the landscaping code, implemented electronic signs regulatory reform, Ronto Development Corp. executed concurrency management ordinance reform and strengthened disclosure practices. Other notable achievements include community Collier Co., FL sector planning review and standards, co -directing the County/FGCU City of Cape Coral, FL 50-meter Pool Inter -local Agreement with $4.7MM matching funding, City of Bonita Springs Land Development & Real Estate As a principle in the Southland Group, he directed/managed over 3 Realmark Properties, Inc. dozen underwriting, finance and restructuring real estate development Carroll Properties/Gulf Star Marine projects, including the Gulf Coast Health Park. As a principle with Eagle Realty of SW FL he directed a $365MM private investment Yacht Clubs of the Americas, LLC portfolio featuring up to 16 assets throughout FL. He was responsible for the acquisition, syndication and funding for the Telegraph Creek University of Florida Foundation Ranch, the Hendry County River Ranch, Judd Creek and 13 other Ingman Marine development and real estate investment projects. As a partner and project manager he was co -responsible for finance, entitlements and Banks Engineering project management for a $236MM 3 bundled marina project (YCOA Tampa, Naples, Key West; 2004-2008). He co -directed the YCOA Knott Consoer PA business plan, debt and equity raise, project design, construction and Select Real Estate of SW FL operations and successfully met the challenge of simultaneous permitting and construction for 3 marina resorts in 20 months. PROFESSIONAL APPOINTMENTS AND COMMUNITY AFFAIRS • Appointed Chairman, Lee County Local Planning Agency (1992 -- 2002) • Appointed as a Director, the Real Estate Investment Society (1994 — 1997) • Appointed as a Director, the Economic Development Coalition (1996 - 1997) • Appointed to the Lee County Land Development Code Advisory Committee (1996) • Appointed to the Lee County School Boards Construction Advisory Committee (1991) 3 • Appointed to Lee County's Affordable Housing Committee (1992) Greg Stuart, MAURP QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERIENCE (cont.) NOTABLE QUALIFICATIONS AND Mr. Stuart's land development and real estate experience includes acquisition EXPERIENCES analysis and feasibility, financial underwriting, contracts and asset dispensation. • Successfully directed and/or was the senior planning principal for Planning, Zoning and Urban Design over 130+quasl-judicial and Mr. Stuart designed, planned, permitted and directed Treehouse Village, a judicial planning and land use multifamily residential development; awarded the City of Gainesville's cases es throughout FL la Seattle. Outstanding Residential Development Award. Principal Planner and/or Project of Washington College of Manager responsible for planning, design and permitting for the Hancock Creek Estates and Tuscan Pointe waterfront residential subdivisions (North Fort Business featured speaker on Myers), Stuart Harbor Yacht Club (Stuart, FL), and Realmark Development's development & finance (2017). Estates at Entrada, the Tucker Grade mixed use projects. He was responsible 0 Authored the Planning & Land Use for the planning and permitting of five interstate highway commerce centers, Certified Coastal Practitioner including the Bonita Grande CPD, the Estero Interstate Commerce Park at Credentialing Program for the Corkscrew Rd. the Stock Development's Vintage Commerce Center and Alico Coastal Zone Foundation (2018) Crossroads CPD in Lee County. • Authored the 2016 NW Cape Coral Land Development, Entitlements 8 Project Management Sector Plan, with emphasis on economic &environmental systems Notable land development residential projects include Lennar US Homes integration. Heritage Cove (Ft. Myers), and the Pinnacle Oaks PUD Charlotte Harbor waterfront project. Commercial retail center entitlement and project • Successfully defended Lee Co. in a management experience is illustrated by the Bonita Springs Home Depot $74MM inverse land use Center, a 240,000 SF retail center, Miromar Factory Shops, a 700,000 SF condemnation case (RCH v. Lee, regional outlet mall, the Estero Greens/Sam Galloway Dealership, a 229,000 2011). SF. commercial shopping center (1996), and Sierra Meadows, a 300 unit, 0 Co-authored the Greater Pine 260,000 commercial SF Naples mixed use activity center. He directed various Island Community Plan and environmental permitting tasks, including the Bonita Grande CPD Kehl Canal awarded the 2016 FPZA Award for Flow Way restoration and enhancement, Key West YCOA riparian rights Outstanding Environmental transfer and mangrove conservation and North Trail RV Resort. He was co- Plan/Study. project manager and responsible for redesigning and amending the Timberland and Tiburon DRI, the Parker Lakes DRI, and environmental permitting for the As the Senior Principal for Eagle Tamalico Center, a 600,000 sq. ft. commercial -industrial DRI. He was Realty of SW FL, directed, planned responsible for numerous rezoning and comprehensive plan amendments, and entitled a $365MM real estate including the Summerlin Park CPD and the Casa Del Mar RPD. He was land portfolio (1999 — 2008). responsible for obtaining a precedent setting park impact fee reduction for the 0 Effectively co -directed a $226MM 235-acre Parker Lakes, saving the client over $250,000 in development three marina resort redevelopment exactions. Throughout these project's Mr. Stuart was responsible agent project (YCOA Tampa, Naples and representation and public communications and negotiations with environmental Key West; 2005-2008). organizations and civic and neighborhood associations. Responsible for the planning and Professional Planning Expert and Testimony design for over 500 site plans, He is a recognized authority on growth management, land use planning and urban designs and master urban design; selected as the featured speaker (National Conference on Growth development plans, including the Management, San Diego ASCE; Un. Of Washington College of Business & Real award winning Treehouse Village Estate), extensively quoted press and electronic media throughout Southwest (1986). Florida and a ten-year former County Planning Commissioner. Mr. Stuart has 0 Planning, permitting and project been the lead expert land use planning witness in over 120 judicial and quasi- management for 6 Lee County, FL judicial, with successful testimony in a variety of cases such as the RCH v. Lee interstate interchange commercial Co., a $74MM inverse condemnation mine case, Kline v. Fort Myers Beach centers (1995 — 2005). substantive due process case, the City of Redmond v. Union Shares inverse Designed, planned, entitled and condemnation case, the Estero Group v. Lee inverse condemnation mine case, the Suwannee River Camp Resort Chapter 120 Administrative Appeal, Lee obtained the first and only Co. v. Dahlke a Chapter 120 FLUM Amendment Appeal, the Three Oaks Development of Regional Impact Parkway v. Corlico ROW condemnation case, Caribbean Beach Club v. approval along the Suwannee Allstate Insurance coastal reconstruction build back settlement and Flanagan River (Suwannee Trails Camp v. FL DEP coastal construction line variance administrative hearing case. Resort 1985—1887). 4 Greg Stuart, MUP -- Expert Planning Judicial & Quasi-judicial Testimony Case List • 725 Azalea v. City of Vero Beach: 2020 Case 19-5531 GM, Public Sector Defense DOAH Hearing FLUM Amendment; Vero Beach, FL. • Geo Group, Inc. v. City of Tacoma: 2019 Case 3:18-cv-05233, Private Sector Down Zoning & Takings US District Court Western District; Tacoma, WA. • Sakata Seed Corporation v. Lee Co.: 2019 Case # 19-3848GM Private Sector Plaintiff DOAH Hearing FLUM Amendment; Fort Myers, FL • Topps Center CPD: 2019 20190027, Private Sector Hotel Zoning & MCP Entitlement; Town of Fort Myers Beach, FL • Oak Villages RPD: 2019 DC12017-00010, Private Sector MF Residential Zoning Entitlement; Fort Myers, FL • The Pratt Place RPD: 2019 DC12018-00008, Private Sector Zoning Entitlement Testimony, Lee Co., FL. • The Baumgarten MPUD: 2019 PL20170000768, Private Sector Land Use Zoning Compatibility Testimony, Collier Co., FL. • Southland Lakes Investors Request For Judicial Notice: 2019 18-CA-000268, Plaintiff Injunction and Highest and Best Use Testimony, Lee Co., FL. • Lake Sammamish Mediation 2019 Plaintiff Highest and Best Use Testimony, King County, WA • Alico 254 Parcels G H I & J MPD Amendment; 2018 DC12017-00001, Private Sector Zoning Entitlement, Lee Co., FL • Treeline 28 Commercial Park; 2018 DC12017-00011, Private Sector Zoning Entitlement, Lee Co., FL • Embers Parkway Future Land Use Map Amendment; LU17-0008, Private Sector Land Use Map Amendment Entitlement, Cape Coral, FL • Kline v Fort Myers Beach: 2017 CA 16-CA-001866, Substantive Due Process Defense of Town of Fort Myers Beach • Appeal of Official Interpretation: 2017 INTP-2017-PL-1233, Private Sector Permit Interpretation For Appellant, Collier Co., FL • Gulf Star Marina Renovation• DC12009-00061, 2017 Private Sector PD Zoning, Lee Co. • Bonita Breeze CPD: PD16-31234-BOS, 2017 Private Sector Zoning, the City of Bonita Springs • 21421 Widgeon Terrace: VAR16-0012 2017 Private Sector Variance; Town of Fort Myers Beach • Morris Irrevocable Family Trust vs. Pacific Coast Coal Co.. Inc.; 2016 Demand For Arbitration, Private Sector Litigation, King County, WA • The City of Redmond vs. Union Shares, LLC: 2016 #15-2-12698-9 SEA, Private Sector Condemnation Defense and Counterclaim, Redmond, WA • Mark Freeman, Richard Bennett Land Trust, Brinker Brown, & D&D Machine & Hydraulics, Inc. vs. Lee Co.; 2015 12-CA-2517 Inverse Condemnation & Bert Harris in defense of Lee Co., FL • The Commons Club Administrative Appeal of Permit Denial: 2015, REZ COM 15-20639, Private Sector Plaintiff, Lee Co., FL • Gasparilla Marine Sales CPD Rezoning: 2014, DCI 2015-00009, Private Sector Zoning, Lee Co., FL • The Restaurant Depot Rezoning: 2015, REZ 2015-00002, Quasi-judicial Private Sector Zoning, Lee Co., FL • Estero Group LTD v. Lee Co.: 2014 12-CA-1705 Inverse Condemnation & Bert Harris, Lee Co. Defense, Lee Co., FL • Grandezza Home Owners Association v. Miromar Lakes, LLC 2013/14: DC12013-00008 Private Sector Quasi-judicial Zoning Appeal for the POA, Lee Co., FL • Carter -Pritchett v. Lee Co. 2014/15: 12-CA-002517 Floodway Inverse Condemnation & Bert Harris, Lee Co. Defense, Lee Co., FL • Bermuda Lakes RVPD; 2014, DC12014-00010, Quasi-judicial Private Sector Zoning, Lee Co. • Westgate Center IPD; 2014, DC12014-00001, Quasi-judicial Private Sector Zoning, Lehigh Acres, FL • Huffmaster Easement Condemnation; 2014, Public Sector Pre -condemnation Analysis for Lee Co., FL, North Fort Myers, FL • MiromarLakes v. Grandezza; 2013, DR12013-00021 & DC12013-00008, Private Sector DRI & NOI, Estero, FL • Lee Co. v. Weimarr 09CA-5705T 2013 Condemnation, Lee Co. Plaintiff, Lee Co., FL • McGuigun v. Lee Co.; 09-CA-005689 2013, Riparian Rights and Inverse Condemnation, Lee Co. Defense, San Carlos Island, FL • Lee Co. v. McCoy; 2013, Condemnation, Lee Co. Plaintiff, Lee Co., FL • Orange Grove Center CPD; 2012, DCI 2012-00023, Private Sector CPD Amendment; Lee Co., FL • RCH v. Lee County; 10-CA-002364 Inverse Condemnation & Bert Harris; 2011 Lee Co. Defense, Lee Co., FL • C. Johnson SF Rezoning; 2012, REZ 2011-00007, Private Sector Zoning, Lee Co., FL • Lee Countv Burnt Store Road; #06A-939, Parcel 123 ROW Condemnation; 2009/2011, Lee Co. Plaintiff, Lee Co., FL • Dahlke v. Lee County 2009, 08-CA-419, Fort Myers Beach Inverse Condemnation, FL, Ch 120 Appeal, Lee Co. Defendant, Fort Myers Bch. FL • Caribbean Beach Club; 2009, 06-CA-004562 Development and Construction Private Party Litigation, Fort Myers Bch., FL • Three Oaks Parkway; 2008, 06A-939; ROW Condemnation, Lee Co. Plaintiff, Lee Co., FL • Three Oaks Parkway Corlico; 2008, 05CA-4770 2008, ROW Condemnation Lee Co. Plaintiff, Lee Co., FL • Collier County vs. Flick -County Barn Road Parcel 124; 2008, #60101, ROW Condemnation, Collier Co. Plaintiff, Collier Co., FL • Collier County vs. Graziani, et. al. Parcels 134, 135 and 136; 2008, #62081, ROW Condemnation, Collier Co. Plaintiff, Collier Co., FL • Alico Crossroads CPD Amendment; 2007, DCI 2008-0000, Private Sector CPD Zoning, Lee Co., FL • Tuscan Pointe RPD; 2006, DC12008-00088, Private Sector RPD Zoning, North Ft. Myers, FL • Thompson Variance; 2004/05, VAR 2005-00018, Private Sector Variance and Appeal, Pine Island, FL • Hendry Co. River Ranch; 2004/05, Private Sector Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Hendry Co., FL • Hancock Creek Estates RPD; 2004, DC12005-00063, Private Sector RPD Zoning, North Fort Myers, FL • Vintage Commerce Center CPD Amendment; 2004, DC12004-00065, Private Sector CPD Zoning, South Fort Myers, FL • Pinnacle Oaks PUD; 2004, PA-04-05-16-LS, Private Sector FLUM Amendment and PUD Zoning; Charlotte Co., FL • Kelly Carlos; 2004/2005, Lee Co., FL, Private Sector Contract Litigation Support, South Fort Myers, FL • FDOT v. Fleck Alico LLC.; 2004, Fort Myers, FL, Private Sector Interchange ROW Condemnation, Lee Co. FL • Collier Co. v. Ruth.; 2004, #41825480000, Collier Co., FL, ROW Condemnation • Englewood SR 776 Right of WaY; 2004, Private Sector ROW Condemnation, Charlotte Co., FL, • Estates At Entrada RPD; 2004, DC12004-00080. Private Sector Zonina. North Fort Mvers. FL. • Tucker Grade: FLUM Amendment; 2004, PA-04-05-20-LS, Private Sector Residential and Commercial Map Amendment, Charlotte Co, FL • Fitzgerald 108-Acre Land Use Amendment; 2004, CPA2004-04, Private Sector Land Use Map & Text Amendment, Lee Co., FL, • The Murdock Town Center Case 2003 Parcels 1026 931 290 167 169 206 237 308 311, Private Sector Land Condemnation, Charlotte Co., FL • Marvel CG ZOning; 2003, REZ 2003-00017, Private Sector Zoning, Fort Myers, FL, • Vanderbilt Condemnation; 2003, Collier Co., FL, ROW Condemnation Support, Collier Co., FL • Flanagan v. FDEP; 2003 #07-CA-000474, Private Sector CCL Appeal, Captiva, FL • Longwood Villas RPD; 2002/2003, DC12002-00065, RPD Zoning and RPD Zoning Amendment, Lee Co., FL • Judd Creek; 2003, #LU03-01000027, Private Sector Annexation and Large Scale Land Use Map Amendment, Cape Coral, FL • IAD Capital Corp.: 2003, REZ2004-00011, Private Sector Light Industrial Zoning, North Fort Myers, FL • Heritage Lakes Annexation and FLUM; 2003, 09-26-2003, Private Sector FLUM Large Scale Amendment and Annexation, Fort Myers, FL • City Mattress CPD; 2002, DC12003-00021, Private Sector CPD Zoning, Bonita Springs, FL • River Ranch 508; 2002, CPA-04-06, Private Large Scale Map Amendment, Hendry Co., FL • Storgard IPD; 1998/2002, Z-98-032, Private Sector IPD Zoning & Amendments, Lee Co., FL • Longwood Villas RPD: 2002, DIC2002-00065, Private Sector RPD Zoning, Lee Co., FL • Alico Crossroads CPD; 2002, DC12002-00052, Private Sector CPD Zoning, Lee Co., FL • Corkscrew Mine IPD Amendment; 2002, DC12002-00066, Private Sector IPD Mine Amendment, Lee Co., FL • Estero Pointe CPD; 2002, DC12002-00039, Private Sector RPD Zoning, Estero, FL • SR 776 47 Amendment; 2002, #0070384-000000-9, Private Sector Large Scale FLUM Amendment and CG Zoning, Charlotte Co., FL • Paradise Woods RS-1; 2002, REZ2002-00004, Private Sector Residential Zoning, Bonita Springs, FL, • Geraci vs. Lee County Port Authority; 2001, Private Sector Land Condemnation, Lee Co., FL • Hiding Park RPD; 2001, Z-96-073, Private Sector RPD Zoning and Amendments, Lee Co., FL • Winkler Reserve RPD; 2001, DCI 2002-00012, Private Sector RPD Zoning, Lee Co., FL • Renaissance Executive Center, 2001, #REZ2001-00015, SEZ2001-00017, Private Sector Zoning and Special Exception, Lee Co., FL • Bonita Beach Village CPD; 2001/1999, ADD 2001-00073, PD-99-034, Private Sector CPD Zoning and Rezoning (Home Depot), Bonita Springs, FL • T&T DRI/MPD Amendment; 2001, DC12001-00062, Private Sector DRI Amendment and RPD Rezoning, Estero, FL • Crystal Commerce Center IPD; 2001, DC12001-00039, Private Sector IPD Zoning, Fort Myers, FL, • Alico Commons CPD, 2001, DC12000-00090, Private Sector CPD Zoning, Lee Co., FL • Parker Plaza Office Park CPD; 2001, #DC12001-00048, Private Sector CPD Zoning, Fort Myers, FL • Harbor Ridge RPD; 2001, DC12001-00026, Private Sector RPD Zoning, Lee Co., FL, • Corkscrew Growers Sec. 3 RPD/CPD; 2000, DC12000-00070, Private Sector RPD Zoning, Lee Co., FL • Bonita Grande CPD; 2000/2008, ORD 08-09, Private Sector CPD Zoning and Appeal, Bonita Springs, FL, • Edison Village PUD; 2000, PUD-2000-15, Private Sector Commercial PUD Zoning, Collier Co., FL, • SR 776 58, 2000, PA-00-11-441-S, Private Sector Large Scale Commercial Map Amendment and CG Zoning, Charlotte Co., FL • Riveralace of Estero MUPD; 2000, DC12000-00064, Private Sector MUPD Zoning, Estero, FL • Storgard IPD; 1999/1997/1995 # 95-07-258.03Z.02.01, Private Sector IPD Zoning and Amendment, Lee Co, FL • Sierra Meadows PUD; 1997/1999, PUD-94-01, Private Sector Mixed Use PUD Zoning, Collier Co., FL • Estero Interstate Commerce Park CPD; 1999, #99-08-241.03Z01.01, Private Sector CPD Zoning, Estero, FI, • GM Pine Island Small Scale Map Amendment; Appeal 1999, # 99-2047GM, Private SectorFLUM Appeal & Ch. 120, Pine Island, FL • Springs Plaza Mini -warehouse SE; 1995/99, 95-01-031.01 S 01.01, Private Sector Special Exception, Bonita Springs, FL, • Airport Autopark CPD; 1999, # 99-04-324.03Z 01.01, Private Sector CPD Zoning, Lee Co., FL • Massey Building CPD; 1999, Private Sector Minor CPD Zoning, Lee Co., FL • The P. R, C & M PUD; 1999, # 99-07, Private Sector PUD Zoning, Collier Co., FL • The Shores at Gulf Harbour DRI Amendment; 1999, Private Sector DRI#12-8182-21, Lee Co., FL • Bonita Gateway CPD, 1998, #99-10-093.03Z 01.01, Private Sector CPD Zoning, Bonita Springs, FL • Vintage Commerce Center CPD, 1998, # 99-06-355.03Z, Private Sector CPD Zoning, Lee Co., FL • Vincentian PUD; 1998, R-97-8, Private Sector Mixed Use Zoning, Collier Co., FL • Kristen Woods RPD/CPD, 1998, # 98-08-067.03Z 01.01, Private Sector RPD & CPD Zoning, Estero, FL • Corkscrew Palms CPD; 1997, #97-08-132.03Z 01.01, Private Sector CPD Zoninq, Estero, FL • Flordeco IPD; 1997, #97-05-181.03Z 01.01, Private Sector IPD Zonina, North Fort Mvers. FL • Florida Rock IPD; 1996, Private Sector IPD Amendment, Lee Co., FL • Keith Miller Old US 41 Condemnation; 1997, Private Sector ROW Condemnation, Lee Co., FL • Eagle Stringfellow Amendment, 1998, PAM 98-01, Private Sector FLUM Amendment, Pine Island, FL • Estero Greens CPD; 1997, 97-04-065-03Z, Private Sector CPD Zoning, Estero, FL • The Plaza LLC vs. Lee County; 1996, Private Sector Colonial Prky. ROW Condemnation, Fort Myers, FL • Carissa CPD; 1996, #96-12-014.03Z 01.01, Private Sector CPD Zoning, Lee Co., FL • Heritage Cove RPD; 1996, #98-02-064.03Z, Private Sector RPD Zoning, Lee Co., FL • Char -Lee Mine PD, 1995, Private Sector PUD Mine Zoning, Charlotte Co., FL, • The Palmetto Point Property Owners Ass. Vs. Lee Co; 1995, Private Sector ROW Condemnation, Lee Co., FL • Lee Co. vs. The State Of Florida DCA; 1995, Public Sector FL Administrative Appeal, Lee Co., FL • T&T DRI AmendmenbMiromar Outlet Mall CPD; 1994/95, Private Sector DRI Amendment and CPD Zonina. Estero. FL. • Casa Del Mar RPD; 1992, Private Sector RPD Zoning, Lee Co., FL • Florida Rock Sand Mine; 1991, Private Sector, Aq. SE Zoninq, Glades Co. • Tamalico Center, 1991, Private Sector Commercial DRI Amendment. Lee Co.. FL • Summerlin Park CPD; 1991, Private Sector CPD Zoning, Lee Co., FL • Timberland and Tiburon; 1991/1992, Private Sector Mixed Use DRI Amendment and RPD/CPD Zoning, Estero, FL • The Old St. Augustine Road ROW Condemnation, 1989, Private Sector ROW Condemnation, Duval Co., FL • North Florida Regional Medical Center, 1987/1989, DRI Amendment, CON & Zoning, Gainesville, FL • Suwannee Trails Camp Resort LLC vs. DCA, 1988, Private Sector Ch. 120 Administrative Appeal, Hamilton Co., FL • Suwannee Trails Camp Resort DRI, 1986/1987, Private Sector DRI & Zoning, Hamilton Co., FL • Orange Blossom Gardens AMDA/DRI, 1987, Private Sector DRI & Chapter 120 Appeal, Lake Co., FL • Treehouse Village PD, 1986, Private Sector MF Residential PUD, Gainesville, FL Greg Stuart, MAURP - Representative Real Estate Analysis and Underwriting 2009 to 2017 2017: East Las Olas: $1.75MM Syndication 2011: Hospitality Fund; $75MM Specialized Opportunity Fund 2011: Challenger Driving Range, Estero, FL; $300,000 Offering 2011: Mercy Hospital Lakes Campus, Des Moines, Iowa; financing 2011: Hospitality Specialists Bundled Portfolio. Grand Rapids, MI; partnership buyout 2011: Port Labelle Sports Car Club, Hendry Co., FL; real estate workout and development 2011: Willow Gate Trails Subdivision, South Bend, IN; real estate workout and development 2011: Brookside Waterfront Mixed Use Naples, FL; real estate workout planning 2011: Residence Inn Hotel, Moline, IL 2011: Wood River Landing Commercial Center, Wood River, IL 2011: Swaney Napes Hotels, Naples, FL 2011: Eastgate Commerce Park, Fort Mvers, FL: $2.7MM refinancina 2011: Gulf Coast Health Center, Fort Myers, FL; $10MM workout and restructuring plan 2011: Creekside Mixed Use Development: Gahanna, OH 2010: Seven Bundled Residential Development Projects, Auburn Hills, MI and Canton, MI; 386 SF lots, $4.86MM Offering 2010: Southland Lakes Commerce Park, Fort Myers, FL 2010: Oak Station Retail Center, Marianna, FL; 175,000 SF $6.95MM Shopping Center Offering 2010: Gulf Coast Health Park, Fort Myers, FL 2010: Kings Highway Packing House, Arcadia, FL 2010: Windsor Way Apartments, Naples, FL 2010: West Cypress The Learning Center, Estero, FL 2010: Treeline Preserve Retail Center, Fort Myers, FL 2010: The Vines Highway Commercial Parcel, Fort Myers, FL 2010: Sunset Point Resort, Bocas Del Torro, Panama 2010: Sunbelt Warehouse, Fort Myers, FL 2010: Sikeston Outlet Mall, Sikeston, MO 2010: University Parkway Medical Tract, Sarasota, FL 2010: Grandezza Golf Course, Estero, FL 2010: Sanorini Mixed Use Development, Estero, FL 2010: Punta Loros Resort Tract, Costa Rica 2010: Oakwood Apartments, Jacksonville, FL 2010: Hilton Garden Inn, Plymouth, MI 2010: HFS Medical Office Fund, $20MM Specialized Fund 2010: Eastlinks Flex Space, Fort Myers, FL 2010: Dykes Everett Mine, Orange Co., FL 2009: Walker Club Apartments, Vero Beach, FL 2009: Tuscany Villas Apartments, Brandon, FL 2009: Village of Teauesta ACLF, Tequesta, FL 2009: Sugar Mills Apartments, Melbourne, FL 2009: Sterling Crest Apartments, Orlando, FL 2009: Sandpiper Cover Apartments, Boynton Beach, FL 2009: Lynn Mann 8.6 Commercial Tract, Fort Myers, FL 2009: Casey Key Marina, Sarasota, FL 2009: Brookside Marina. Naples, FL 2009: Bonita Exchange Interstate Commerce Park, Bonita Springs, FL 2009: Black Bear Residential, Naples, FL Greg Stuart, MAURP - Real Estate Analysis, Acquisition, Development and Dispensation Project List 2010 — 2012: Gulf Coast Health Park; $22MM Specialty Institutional Mixed Use Development Project, Lee Co, FL. Investment Plan Development, Analysis, Entitlements and Implementation. 2004 — 08: Bayshore Interstate 41; $10AMM Interstate Commerce Development Project, Lee Co., FL. Acquisition, Debt and Equity Raise, Syndication, Underwriting, Project Management, Entitlements and Brokerage. 2005-08: YCOA; $236MM Three Marina Development Project; capitalization For 3 Tampa, Naples and Key West, FL. Marinas; Debt and Equity Raise, Project Management, Oversight and Direction For Principal Partner. 2003-2007: Burnt Store Lakes: $20.1MM Acreage Assembly Residential Development Project; Cape Coral, FL. Project Analysis, Underwriting, Syndication, Marketing & Brokerage. 2004-2007: Pinecreek Ranch; $94MM Land Investment Project, Charlotte Co., FL. Acquisition, Debt and Equity Raise, Syndication, Underwriting and Project Management. 2002-2005: Colonial Interstate 175; $23.7MM Land Investment Project, Lee Co., FL. Acquisition, Debt and Equity Raise, Syndication, Underwriting, Project Management, Entitlements and Brokerage. 2001-2004: Judd Creek; $8.9MM Mixed Use Investment Project, North Fort Myers, FL. Underwriting and Feasibility, Acquisition, Equity Raise, Entitlement, Project Management and Brokerage. 2001-2006: Hendry Co. River Ranch; $17.8MM Land Investment and Development Project, Hendry Co., FL. Acquisition, Debt and Equity Raise, Syndication, Underwriting, Project Management, Entitlements and Brokerage. 2002 -2004: Telegraph Creek Ranch; $10MM Investment Project, Hendry Co., FL. Underwriting and Feasibility, Acquisition, Equity Raise, Entitlement, Project Management and Brokerage. 2000-2005: The Charlotte 58 Activity Center. Port Charlotte, FL. $13.2MM Acquisition, Debt and Equity Raise, Underwriting, Project Management, Entitlements and Brokerage. 2002-2006: Hancock Creek Commerce Park; $22MM Investment Project, Cape Coral, FL. Underwriting and Feasibility, Acquisition, Equity and Equity Raise, Entitlement, Project Management and Brokerage Dispensation. 1997-2008: Pinnacle Oaks; $12MM Residential Development Investment Project, Charlotte Co., FL. Entitlement and Project Management. 2000-2007: South Gulf Cove Residential; $30MM Waterfront Lots and Mixed Acreage Investment Project, Charlotte Co., FL. Acquisition, Equity Raise, Entitlement, Project Management and Brokerage Dispensation. 2001-2007: South Gulf Cove Commercial; $15MM 58 acre Commercial Acreage Investment Project, Charlotte Co., FL. Underwriting and Feasibility, Acquisition, Equity Raise, Entitlement, Entitlement/Project Management and Brokerage Dispensation. 1998-2003: Kelly Carlos; $17MM Land Investment Project, Lee Co., FL. Entitlement, Project Management and Brokerage Dispensation. 1997- 2005: Bonita Grande: $12.5MM Land Investment Project, Bonita Springs, FL. Acquisition, Equity Raise, Entitlement and Project Management. 10 Exhibit Two _ The One Naples Site Highest & Best Use CASE _ THE ONE NAPLES GMP MAP AMENDMENT, MUPD REZONING & STREET VACATION Page 1 of 4 Primary Trade Area BG 4 CT101.10 D BG 3 (T102.09 x Nap',--- r)a o BG 2 CT101.09 BG 1 CT102.09 BG 3 CT101.09 BG 1 CT101.09 BG 4 BG 3 CT102.08 CT102.15 BG 1 BG 2 CT102.08 CT102.15 The One Naples C-3 Primary Market Area For Retail Goods & Services _ 3,933 Households Page 2 of 4 Medium HH North Naples Census Tracts Persons HH Income Block Group I CT 102.09 672 353 $ 133,977.00 Gulf Shore Drive N. Of VBR Block Group 3 CT 101.09 1171 412 $ 48,690.00 Naples Park (south) Block Group 3 CT 102.09 688 328 $ 160,917.00 Naples Park (west) Block Group 3 CT 102.15 1282 723 $ 250,001.00 Pelican Bay (west) Block Group 1 CT 102.08 492 280 $ 140,942.00 Pelican Bay (cast & south to Pelican Bay Blvd) Block Group 2 CT 102.15 549 279 $ 191,875.00 Pelican Bay (south) Block Group 4 CT 102.08 774 443 $ 102,269.00 Pelican bay (east ME US 41) Block Group 1 CT 101.09 423 235 $ 99,250.00 East &North VBR MP Block Group 4 CT 101.10 1165 547 $ 70,885.00 NE Naples Park Block Group 2 CT 101.09 709 333 $ 63,869.00 Naples Park SE TOTAL 7925 3933 AVERAGE $ 126,267.50 Source: American Community Survey, 5 Yr. Est. Highest and Best Use IS THE SITE PHYSICALLY VIABLE; I.E., CAN THE SITE SUSTAIN THE DEVELOPMENT? FROM A REGULATORY FRAMEWORK, IS THE PROJECT REALISTICALLY FEASIBLE? IS THERE, AND/OR, WILL THERE BE A REALISTIC MARKET FOR THE PROJECT THAT OPTIMIZES INVESTMENT VALUE? Page 3 of 4 Applicant's Evidence For The 100,000 SF Alt. Commercial Development Plan A. Will The County Vacate $4.3MM Street ROW For This Doubtful Q. Is There A Market For 2nd FL, 3rd FL, 4th FL & 5th FL Retail _ No C. Is There A Market For 39,000 SF of Restaurant's _ Doubtful D. Does The 4.63 ac. +/- Site Incorporate Min. 309/6 Open Space (1.38 ac.) No E. Does This Plan Incorporate Required Setbacks, Parking & Drainage _ Doubtful F. Does The Applicant's Plan Illustrate Feasible C-3 Uses No Findings 1. FOR THE ONE NAPLES TIS MODELED 39,000 SF RESTAURANT AND 61,000 SF RETAIL, A 100,000 SF COMMERCIAL PROJECT IS NOT THE HIGHEST AND BEST USE OF THE SITE, IT WILL NEVER BE BUILT, CONSEQUENTLY THE APPLICANT'S DATA AND ANALYSIS IS QUESTIONABLE. 2. CONTEMPORARY CENTERS SUCH AS AND INCLUDING A TRADITIONAL NEIGHBORHOOD SHOPPING CENTER WA ANCHOR, A COMMUNITY CENTER W./1 TO 2 ANCHORS, A THEME/ FESTIVAL PROJECT, AND A LIFE STYLE CENTER, DO NOT FIT THE SITE'S REGULATORY FRAMEWORK, PHYSICAL SITE CARRYING CAPACITY AND MARKET FIT. 3. ESTIMATED TRAFFIC IMPACTS AND AN ACCURATE UNDERSTANDING OF THE MUPD'S TRANSPORTATION PUBLIC BENEFITS HAVE YET TO BE ESTABLISHED. Page 4 of 4 STUARTANDASSOCIATES Planning & Design Services Exhibit Three The Adjacent Neighborhood Density, Building Height & Setbacks Exhibit For Neighborhood Complementary and Compatibility Analysis CASE _ THE ONE NAPLES GMP MAP AMENDMENT, MUPD REZONING & STREET VACATION Page 1 of 7 STUARTANDASSOCIATES Planning & Design Services Adjacent Neighborhood Study Area FINDING _ Bay Colony/Pelican Bay Is A Functionally & Perceptually Distinct Neighborhood That Offers Little In Accurate Analysis 1 Gated Private and Semi -private Resort Access & Circulation _ South Gulf Shore Dr. Neighborhood Non -gated, Public Rd. Access & Circulation. 2 Large Scale DRI w./Unified Control and Community Associations _ Independent South Gulf Shore Dr. Neighborhood Projects. 3 A DRI Development Order and PUD Zoning _ Independent South Gulf Shore Dr. Conventional C-3, RT, RSF-3, RMF-6 & RMF-16 Zoning. 4 Large Parcel Urban Form w./Curvilinear Streets _ South Gulf Shore Dr. Vanderbilt Bch. Rd. Small Parcel Urban Form w./Straight Streets. 5 The Vanderbilt Beach Rd. Edge _ Limited Pedestrian Linkage From Site To Trieste/Pelican Bay; Arterial Road Separation. Page 2 of 7 STUARTANDASSOCIATES Planning & Design Services Site Building Frontyard Adjacent Communities Year Built # Units Area Density Ht Stories Setback A _ Beachmoor 1981 33 1.7 ac 19.0 per ac 12 67.0 ft B _ Phonecian Sands 1991 10 0.7 ac 15.3 per ac 6 25.0 ft C _ Vanderbil The A Condo 9235 Gulf Shore Dr. 2005 19 1.3 ac 14.4 per ac 12 26.0 ft D _ Vanderbilt Bch & Harbour Club 9318 Gulf Shore Dr 1982 44 2.1 ac 21.2 per ac 6 80.0 ft E _ Seawatch Condo 9375 Gulf Shore Dr 1981 26 2.1 ac 12.5 per ac 8 45.0 ft F _ Vanderbilt Bch Motel Condo 1st Add 9256 Gulf Shore 1990 16 1.1 ac 14.5 per ac 4 62.5 ft G _ The Watermark Condo 9380 Gulf Shore 1991 22 1.4 ac 16.0 per ac 5 41.0 ft H _Vanderbilt Palms 1985 28 0.5 ac 52.8 per ac 3 20.0 ft I _ Barefoot Pelican 1984 60 1.3 ac 45.8 per ac 5 35.0 ft I _ Vanderbilt Hideaway 377 Vanderbilt Bch Rd 1984 15 0.3 ac 53.6 per ac 4 17.0 ft K _ Regatta 2000 205 9.1 ac 22.5 per ac 12 & 6 150.0 ft L _ Chateau 9101 Vanderbilt Dr 1990 16 1.0 ac 16.5 per ac 2 20.0 ft AVERAGE DENSITY with H & I OUTIER PARCELS 25.3 per ac AVERAGE DENSITY W./OUT OUTLIER PARCELS 19.8per ac AVERAGE DENSITY W./3 OUTLIER PARCELS & TRIESTE 25.1 per ac AVERAGE BUILDING HEIGHT with H & ] OUTLIER PARCELS 6.4 Stories AVERAGE BUILDING HEIGHT W./OUT OUTLIER PARCELS 7.4 Stories AVERAGE BUILDING HEIGHT W./3 OUTLIER PARCELS & TRIESTE 7.5 AVERAGE FRONTYARD SETBACK 1 49.0 ft NOTE _ Outlier Parcel Data For Statistical Analysis Denoted In Red Text NOTE _ Trieste Is Within The Bay Colony Club Community Association & Enjoys Pelican Bay PUD Common Open Space Building Frontyard Other Nearby Communities & Buildings # Units Site Area Density Ht Stories Setback Beachwalk Gardens _ SF Patio Homes 2 The Trieste 105 4.74 ac 22.2 per ac 20 120 ft The Ritz Parking Garage 3 58 ft Connor Vanderbilt Beach Estates SF 1 & 2 Page 3 of 7 STUARTANDASSOCIATES Planning & Design Services Adjacent Neighborhood Densities Adjacent Communities Year Built # Units Area Density A _ Beachmoor 1981 33 1.7 ac 19.0 per ac B _ Phonecian Sands 1991 10 0.7 ac 15.3 per ac C _ Vanderbil The A Condo 9235 Gulf Shore Dr. 2005 19 1.3 ac 14.4 per ac D _ Vanderbilt Bch & Harbour Club 9318 Gulf Shore Dr 1982 44 2.1 ac 21.2 per ac E _ Seawatch Condo 9375 Gulf Shore Dr 1981 26 2.1 ac 12.5 per ac F _ Vanderbilt Bch Motel Condo 1st Add 9256 Gulf Shore 1990 16 1.1 ac 14.5 per ac G _ The Watermark Condo 9380 Gulf Shore 1991 22 1.4 ac 16.0 per ac H _Vanderbilt Palms 1985 28 0.5 ac 52.8 per ac I _ Barefoot Pelican 1984 60 1.3 ac 45.8 per ac I _ Vanderbilt Hideaway 377 Vanderbilt Bch Rd 1984 15 0.3 ac 53.6 per ac K _ Regatta 2000 205 9.1 ac 22.5 per ac L _ Chateau 9101 Vanderbilt Dr 1990 16 1.0 ac 16.5 per ac AVERAGE DENSITY with H & I OUTIER PARCELS 25.3 per ac AVERAGE DENSITY W./OUT OUTLIER PARCELS 19.8 per ac AVERAGE DENSITY W./3 OUTLIER PARCELS & TRIESTE 25.1 per ac Page 4 of 7 STUARTANDASSOCIATES Planning & Design Services Adjacent Neighborhood Building Heights Site Building Adjacent Communities Year Built # Units Area Ht Stories A _ Beachmoor 1981 33 1.7 ac 12 B _ Phonecian Sands 1991 10 0.7 ac 6 C _ Vanderbil The A Condo 9235 Gulf Shore Dr. 2005 19 1.3 ac 12 D _ Vanderbilt Bch & Harbour Club 9318 Gulf Shore Dr 1982 44 2.1 ac 6 E _ Seawatch Condo 9375 Gulf Shore Dr 1981 26 2.1 ac 8 F _ Vanderbilt Bch Motel Condo 1st Add 9256 Gulf Shore 1990 16 1.1 ac 4 G _ The Watermark Condo 9380 Gulf Shore 1991 22 1.4 ac 5 H _Vanderbilt Palms 1985 28 0.5 ac 3 I _ Barefoot Pelican 1984 60 1.3 ac 5 J _ Vanderbilt Hideaway 377 Vanderbilt Bch Rd 1984 15 0.3 ac 4 K _ Regatta 2000 205 9.1 ac 12 & 6 L _ Chateau 9101 Vanderbilt Dr 1990 16 1.0 ac 2 AVERAGE BUILDING HEIGHT with H & J OUTLIER PARCELS 6.4 AVERAGE BUILDING HEIGHT W./OUT OUTLIER PARCELS 7.4 AVERAGE BUILDING HEIGHT W./3 OUTLIER PARCELS & TRIESTE 7.5 Page 5 of 7 STUARTANDASSOCIATES Planning & Design Services Adjacent Neighborhood Front -yard Setbacks Frontyard Adjacent Communities Setback A _ Beachmoor 67.0 B _ Phonecian Sands 25.0 C _ Vanderbil The A Condo 9235 Gulf Shore Dr. 26.0 D _ Vanderbilt Bch & Harbour Club 9318 Gulf Shore Dr 80.0 E _ Seawatch Condo 9375 Gulf Shore Dr 45.0 F _ Vanderbilt Bch Motel Condo 1st Add 9256 Gulf Shore 62.5 G _ The Watermark Condo 9380 Gulf Shore 41.0 H __Vanderbilt Palms 20.0 I _ Barefoot Pelican 35.0 _. Vanderbilt Hideaway 377 Vanderbilt Bch Rd 17.0 K _ Regatta 150.0 L Chateau 9101 Vanderbilt Dr 20.0 AVERAGE FRONTYARD SETBACK 59.1 Page 6 of 7 STUARTANDASSOCIATES Planning & Design Services IN Page 7 of 7 STUARTANDASSOCIATES Planning & Design Services Exhibit Four A Complementary and Compatibility Assessment Between Site C-3 Zoning and Proposed MUPD CASE _ THE ONE NAPLES GMP MAP AMENDMENT, MUPD REZONING & STREET VACATION Page 1 of 3 STUARTANDASSOCIATES Planning & Design Services The Zoning District Compatibility & Intensity Assessment _ C-3 Grants Greater Complementary, Compatible and Less Intensive Development When Compared To One Naples THE APPLICANT PUTS FORWARD A JUSTIFICATION THAT RESULTING DEVELOPMENT IMPACTS, FORM AND INTENSITY UNDER THE EXISTING C-3 WILL BE WORSE FOR THE NEIGHBORHOOD THAN THE ONE NAPLES PROJECT. THIS ASSERTION IS FALSE FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS: C-3 zoning is to support neighborhood commercial uses and activities; it permits neighborhood business, professional and personal services and small scale retail uses. Large retail uses greater than 5,000 sf are not permitted; no big Box Retail, WaImart, etc. 2. The Applicant's justification assumes the site can support a 100,000 sf retail center. This assumption is in error in that a 100,000 sf retail center is not the site's highest and best use. 3. The Applicant's justification assumes the site can support 31,000 sf of restaurant and 69,000 sf of retail, equal to 100,000 sf/42% site coverage. A more accurate and feasible 22% commercial use site coverage yields 52,000 sf, which is a compatible and normal neighborhood commercial center. 4. C-3 does not permit wholesale retail types of uses, does not permit outdoor storage, equipment and merchandise, and does not permit Hotels. 5. C-3 Neighborhood Commercial provides for local neighborhood goods and services and thus is compatible with the surrounding neighborhoods. Local neighborhood goods and services serve to reduce vehicular trips and trip length for US 41 goods and services. One Naples does not provide meaningful type and mixture of neighborhood oriented goods; it will add to VBR and GSD traffic congestion because of the rezoning. No Hotel traffic impact analysis has been provided by the Applicant. 6. C-3 Business Commercial development may effectively disperse traffic via the Gulf Shore Ct./Southbay Dr./Vanderbilt Beach Rd/Gulf Shore Dr. Street grid with a 565- ft. Gulf Shore Ct./Southbay Drive intersection separation and no east bound left - out turning movements aligned with the parking garage. Page 2 of 3 STUARTANDASSOCIATES Planning & Design Services One Naples reduces safe intersection connection separation by 215-ft (from 565-ft to 350-ft.), while creating a new conflicting, east bound left -out aligned with the parking garage. 7. C-3 residential mixed use requires human scale pedestrian environment (see 4.02.38 Specific Design Criteria). C-3 requires: • A 21-ft wide pedestrian pathway with street furnishings and street plantings; * The Applicant is requesting an 8-ft multi -use path with no street furnishings; • C-3 Mixed Use requires enhanced parking lot plantings, enhanced building foundation plantings and building architectural standards; 31F The Applicant has not provided building architectural elevations and measurable designs, and has not provided detailed planting material information for building foundation landscaping. 8. C-3 Setbacks for the One Naples project are 25-ft parking garage and 104-ft for the two towers; these setbacks serve to reduce project intensity appearance and support neighborhood compatibility. • One Naples setbacks are 15-ft parking garage, 25-ft for the two towers and a 12.1-ft/zero-ft waterfront setback. These setbacks increase project intensity appearance and are completely detrimental to neighborhood compatibility. 9. C-3 provides for private and public common open space while relying on 30% open space. One Naples does not provide for public common open while relying on swimming pool rooftop open space. The MUPD does not provide legally defined and functional open space; see Exhibit 5 LDC 1.08.02 Definition of Open Space as "Areas that are not occupied by buildings" Page 3 of 3 STUARTANDASSOCIATES Planning & Design Services Exhibit Five Regulatory Framework & Key Collier County Rules For Approval CASE _ THE ONE NAPLES GMP MAP AMENDMENT, MUPD REZONING & STREET VACATION Page 1 of 8 STUARTANDASSOCIATES Planning & Design Services 1. Key Collier Co. Growth Management Plan Rules: Land Use Policy 5.6: New developments shall be compatible with, and complementary to, the surrounding land uses, as set forth in the Land Development Code. • Comment_ One Naples Does Is Not Designed To Fit Into and Be ComplementaryTo The Neighborhood. Land Use Objective 7: Promote smart growth policies, reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and adhere to the existing development character of the Collier County, where applicable, and as follows: Land Use Policy 7.4: The County shall encourage new developments to provide walkable communities with a blend of densities, common open spaces civic facilities and a range of housing prices and types. • Comment— One Naples Does Not Have Function Public Common Open Space & A Blend Of Densities Transportation Objective 7: Develop and adopt standards for safe and efficient ingress and egress to adjoining properties, and encourage safe and convenient on -site traffic circulation through the development review process. • Comment— One Naples Decreases Vehicular Safety By Creating A New 4-Leg Turning Movement Intersection While Reducing Intersection Separation Spacing. Coastal Management Policy 12.1.2: Land use plan amendments in the Category 1 hurricane vulnerability zone shall only be considered if such increases in densities provide appropriate mitigation to reduce the impacts of hurricane evacuation times. • Comment _ One Naples Does Not Provide Hurricane Evacuation Time Mitigation; It Provides 170 Cots and ATrailer. Page 2 of 8 STUARTANDASSOCIATES Planning & Design Services 2. Key Land Development Code Density Rules: 4.07.02.B - Design Requirements _ External Relationships 1. Development within a PUD district shall be compatible with established or planned uses of surrounding neighborhoods and property. 2. The PUD shall provide protection of the development from potentially adverse surrounding influences and Protection of the surrounding area from potentially adverse influences generated by or within the PUD. Fences, walls, or vegetative screening at the boundaries of PUD districts shall be provided, at a minimum, in accordance with the landscaping/ buffering requirements of section 4.06.00 to protect residents from undesirable views, lighting, noise, or other adverse off -site influences, or to protect. • Comment _ One Naples 2X's Height, 2X's Density, 70% to 100% Reduction In Setbacks & No Functional Open Space Is Not Compatible With The Adjacent Neighborhood. 4.07.02.8 - Design Requirements _ Residential Density 3. The BCC may lessen density or intensity of development when it has been determined that development to the maximum density or intensity permissible in this section would: a. Create inconvenient or unsafe access to the PUD; or b. Create traffic congestion in the streets which adjoin or lead to the PUD, or c. Place a burden on parks, recreational areas, schools, and other facilities which serve or are proposed to serve the PUD; or d. Be in conflict with the intent or provisions of the GMP; or e. Create a threat to property or incur abnormal public expense in areas subject to natural hazards; or f. Be incompatible or inconsistent with surrounding neighborhoods or areas; g. Otherwise be inappropriate. • Comment _ One Naples Decreases Vehicular Safety By Creating A New 4-Leg Turning Movement Intersection While Reducing Intersection Separation Spacing. • Comment _ One Naples 2X's Height, 2X's Density, 70% to 100% Reduction In Setbacks & No Functional Open Space Is Not Compatible With The Adjacent Neighborhood. Page 3 of 8 STUARTANDASSOCIATES Planning & Design Services 3. Key LDC Definitions: LDC 1.08.02 Definitions _ Open space: Areas that are not occupied by buildings, impervious parking areas, streets, driveways or loading areas and which may be equipped or developed with amenities designed to encourage the use and enjoyment of the space either privately or by the general public. Examples of open space include: areas of preserved indigenous native vegetation; areas replanted with vegetation after construction; lawns, landscaped areas and greenways; outdoor recreational facilities; and plazas, atriums, courtyards and other similar public spaces. • Comment _ One Naples Private Recreational Rooftop Open Space Occupies The Top Of The Building & Does Not Meet Open Space Definition. LDC 1.08.02 Definitions _ Open space, common: Those areas within or related to a development, not in individually owned lots, designed and intended to be accessible to, and for the common use or enjoyment of, the residents of the development, or the general public. • Comment_ Project Lacks Functional Common Open Space For The Public Which Impacts Neighborhood Compatibility. LDC 1.08.02 Definitions _ Compatibility: A condition in which land uses or conditions can coexist in relative proximity to each other in a stable fashion over time such that no use or condition is unduly negatively impacted directly or indirectly by another use or condition. • Comment_ One Naples 2X's Height, 2X's Density, 70%to 100% Reduction In Setbacks & No Functional Open Space Is Not Compatible With The Adjacent Neighborhood While Creating Long-term Neighborhood Instability By Providing A High Density "Template" and Precedent For Possibly Up To 13 Different Gulf Shore Dr. Redevelopment Sites. Merriam -Webster Definition _ Complementary: Mutually supporting each others lack, as in the complementary relationship that binds the two. • Comment _ One Naples Miami Beach -like Coastal Urban Form Is Not Complementary to The Neighborhood's SW FL Naples Suburban Coastal Form. Page 4 of 8 STUARTANDASSOCIATES Planning & Design Services LDC 1.08.02 Definitions _ Compatibility review: A review pursuant to the Architectural and Site Design Standards contained within section 5.05.08 of the Land Development Code (LDC) in effect at the time SBR Letters of Compliance are requested and that pertains to issues of compatibility with surrounding uses, complimentary patterns of development and mitigation of negative impacts. The Compatibility Review will be limited to compatibility issues, external sidewalks and pathway connections, lighting, dumpster location and screening, and orientation of buildings and ancillary facilities. • Comment _ One Naples 2X's Height, 2X's Density, 70% to 100% Reduction In Setbacks & No Functional Open Space Is Not Compatible With The Adjacent Neighborhood & Should Not Advance To The Final Site Plan Approval stage. LDC 1.08.02 Definitions _ Pedestrian pathway: The area between the Road Rights -of -Way and the building within the Commercial Mixed Use Project and the Residential Mixed Use PUD Project. The Pedestrian pathway shall include: street furnishings; a street tree planting zone, and a pedestrian travel zone, and shall be a minimum of 21 feet in width. • Comment _ One Naples 15-ft Setback & Pathway Does Not Meet Min. Code Standard. Page 5 of 8 STUARTANDASSOCIATES Planning & Design Services 4. 2.03.06 PUD Purpose & Intent: Colper County, rl Land Development Code 8/17/20, 11:49 AM 2.03.06 - Planned Unit Development Districts A. Purpose and intent. The purpose and Intent of establishing the planned unit development district (PUD) is to provide procedures and standards to encourage mixed use planned developments that rrlay be situated at appropriate locations, or planned developments that may or may not be mixed use in the urban fringe areas, all in accordance with the planning and development objectives of the county under the LDC arid the GMP. it is further the purpose and intent of these PUD regulations to encourage ingenuity, innovation and imagination in the planning, design, and development or redevelopment of relatively large tracts of land under unified ownership or control. PUDs produced in compliance with the terms and provisions of this LDC and the GMP may depart from the strict application of setback, height, and minimum lot requirements of conventional zoning districts while maintaining minimum standards by which flexibility may be accomplished, and while protecting the public interest in order to: B. The PUD process is intended to accomplish the following: 1. Provide a creative approach to Improve the quality of the built environment of contiguous tracts of land which will encourage development of infill parcels of contiguous tracts of land in certain circumstances 2. Create a more desirable environment providing for consistency and visual harmony than would be possible through strict application of the minimum requirements of this LDC. 3. Encourage patterns of land use that support economical provisions of infrastructure, resulting in smaller networks of utilities and streets with consequent lower construction and future maintenance costs. 4. Evaluate the impact of a particular PUD on the present and projected population, economy, land use pattern, tax base, street system, and public facility network(s) of the county relative to the various costs and benefits associated with such development. 5. Assure that the development employs techniques featuing amenities and excellence in the form of variations in siting, mixed land uses and/or varied dwelling types, as well as adaptation to and conservation of the topography and other natural characteristics of the land involved. Exceptions to variations in siting, mixed land uses and/or varied dwelling types may be granted on PUD infill development. C. PUD districts shall hereafter be established by amendment of the official zoning atlas according to the procedures established in LDC section 10.02.08 and the Administrative Code. The purpose and intent of establishing and identifying the following classifications is to identify a relationship between a proposed PUD and the other zoning districts withihi n ts LDC, Thee ctag I is to relate the�ur�osie nd intent of the PUD zoning,__- district and the uses permitted within a PUD to defined zoning districts within this LDC and to establish appropriate uses and performance standards within this PUD, which are similar to those allowed by the most similar district(s). PUDs shall hereafter be defined by the following districts and shall be referenced as such within the PUD document as follows: 1. Residentiat planned unit development district. This district is intended to further the general purpose of a planned unit development district set forth above as it relates to residential areas. The principal use of any residential planned unit development is for human habitation in permanent and/or seasonal year-round dwelling units. The RPUD district shall be construed to include the following zoning districts: RSF-1, RSF 2, RSF-3, RSF-4, RSF-5, RSF-6, RMF-6, RMF-12, RMF-16, RT, VR, AND MH. 2. Cornmunity frrilities planned unit development district. This district is intended to accommodate public t�hout:6lank Page 1 o1 17 • Comment _ One Naples Development Standards Are Not At All Similar To Those Allowed By Other Districts & Violate 2.03.06(c). Page 6 of 8 STUARTANDASSOCIATES Planning & Design Services 5. The Regulatory Framework _ 4.02.38 C-3 Mixed Use Purpose & I ntent: 4.02.38 - Specific Design Criteria for Mixed Use Development within C-1 through C-3 Zoning Districts B. Applicability. All properties zoned C-1, C-2 and C-3. These regulations shall apply to all mixed -use projects proposed within these zoning districts, subject to the design criteria set forth in this section. The design criteria address the relationship of buildings, parking, vehicular, and pedestrian movement to create a pedestrian oriented experience. Buildings are encouraged to be built close to the vehicular and pedestrian way to create a continuous active and vibrant streetscape utilizing the architecture, landscaping, lighting, signage, and street furnishings. Vehicular travel ways support two-way traffic and on street parking. A logical pedestrian pathway system is provided throughout that connects the pedestrian movements from one use to another or within use areas. Building arcades and awnings are allowed to extend over the sidewalk to create shade and encourage pedestrian activity. Signage design shall be carefully integrated with site and building design to create a unified appearance for the project. Creativity in the design of signs is encouraged in order to emphasize the unique character of the project. Projects utilizing these design criteria will be developed in compliance with the LDC, except as specified herein. • Comment _ One Naples 15-ft Setback, Building Height and Pathway Does Not Meet Min. PUD & C-3 Mixed Use Standards. 6. Foundational Growth Management Plan Principles: Collier Co. Growth Management Plan Underlying Concepts _ Management of Coastal Development (VII) Extensive populated areas in Collier County are vulnerable to periodic salt -water inundation from tropical storms or hurricanes. It is extremely important that an acceptable balance between at risk population and evacuation capability be achieved. Within the Coastal High Hazard Area maximum permissible residential density is limited in recognition of the level of risk, the existing deficiency of evacuation shelter space and existing patterns of density. - Comment _ One Naples Doubles Density In Coastal High Hazard Zone. Page 7 of 8 STUARTANDASSOCIATES Planning & Design Services Collier Co. Growth Management Plan Underlying Concepts _ Attainment of High Quality Urban Design While the Growth Management Plan as a whole provides the requisite foundation for superior urban design through a sound framework for growth (protection of natural resources, thoughtful guidance of land uses, adequate public facilities and adequate housing), the Future Land Use Element provides several additional measures. Collier County has also adopted Design Standards for all commercial development into the Land Development Code. These Architectural and Site development standards include building design, parking lot orientation, pedestrian access, vehicular movement, landscaping and lighting. • Comment _ One Naples Development Standards Are Not At All Similar To Those Allowed By Other Districts. Page 8 of 8 STUARTANDASSOCIATES Planning & Design Services Exhibit Six The One Naples Collier County Growth Management Plan Internal Consistency Assessment CASE _ THE ONE NAPLES GMP MAP AMENDMENT, MUPD REZONING & STREET VACATION Page 1 of 10 STUARTANDASSOCIATES Planning & Design Services FINDINGS _ The map amendment and zoning application is not consistent with 24 goals, objectives and policies of the Collier County Growth Management Plan. FUTURE LAND USE OBJECTIVE 3: Ensure protection of natural and historic resources, ensure the availability of land for utility facilities, promote compatible land uses within the airport noise zone, and to provide for management of growth in an efficient and effective manner through Land Development Regulations adopted to implement this Growth Management Plan. RESPONSE _ The One Naples development standards significantly vary from similar neighborhood zoning districts and, as such, do not provide for efficient and effective growth management. The project's 15-ft Vanderbilt Beach Road and Gulf Shore Drive (VBR and GSD) street setback effectively precludes any required future right-of-way and road expansion. Thus the development standard does not ensure the availability of land for utility facilities. The doubling of density, doubling of height, 70% to 100% reduction in setbacks, a 15-ft setback for a 1,066 linear foot +/- VBR and GSD parking garage at 40 to 45-ft tall, and the use of private rooftop recreation for common open space are standards inconsistent with LDC regulations and are not effective regulations needed to insure internal consistency. The project is not consistent with Objective 3. Policy3.2: Land Development Regulations have been adopted into the Collier County Land Development Code (LDC) that contain provisions to implement the Growth Management Plan through the development review process. These include the following provisions: F The safe and convenient flow of on -site traffic, as well as the design of vehicle parking areas, are addressed through the site design standards and site development plan requirements of the LDC, which include: access requirements from roadways, parking lot design and orientation, lighting, building design and materials, and landscaping and buffering criteria. RESPONSE _ The One Naples Master Plan reduces intersection connection separation from 565-ft +/- to 350-ft +/- along VBR to Southbay Drive. This reduces driver response time and in so doing reduces safety. The One Naples Master Plan creates a new "4-leg" project Gateway aligned with the VBR parking garage and creates unsafe project east bound left -out turning movements that conflict with parking garage ingress and egress movements. The project further aggravates traffic congestion with particular emphasis on east bound VBR turning movements. The project eliminates potential available and proximate C-3 neighborhood goods and services and therefore increases eastbound US 41 trips and trip lengths to obtain neighborhood goods and services. The project requires a parking space deviation to reduce the number of required parking spaces. These facts demonstrate that the project does not advance safe and convenient flow of on -site traffic. The MUPD development standards weaken existing C-3 mixed use rules and reduces LDC efficiency and effectiveness. The application Exhibit G Streetscape Landscaping illustrates the applications lack of consistency with Objective 3 in so far as site planning, streetscape pathway design, urban design and buffering. The project's streetscape tree planting standards are the code minimum. The project's pathway Page 2 of 10 STUARTANDASSOCIATES Planning & Design Services design is 8-ft and not the code required 21-ft minimum. The project fails to meet adjoining property and neighborhood compatibility standards. The project fails to meet it's entitlement request criteria under LDC Section 10.02.13.B.5. The project is not consistent with Objective 3 and 3F. Refer to the April 27, 2020 Stuart Opinion Letter and the July 15, 2020 Stuart Neighborhood Letter of Objection that are in the staff packet. Refer to Stuart Exhibit 5 Part Two Compatibility Standards and Exhibit 8 Part One The One Naples Planning Analysis. Please refer to the technical traffic impact documentation provide by William Oliver, PE. OBJECTIVE 5: Implement land use policies that promote sound planning, protect environmentally sensitive lands and habitat for listed species while protecting private property rights, ensure compatibility of land uses and further the implementation of the Future Land Use Element. RESPONSE _The map amendment language and the planned development standards do not ensure compatibility of land uses; the request eliminates existing C-3 zoning standards and proposes development standards that are outside the community norm. The project is not consistent with Objective 5 and Policies 5.3 and 5.6. Refer to the April 27, 2020 Stuart Opinion Letter and the July 15, 2020 Stuart Neighborhood Letter of Objection that are in the staff packet. Refer to Stuart Exhibit 5 Part Two Compatibility Standards and Exhibit 8 Part One The One Naples Planning Analysis. Policy 5.3: All rezoning must be consistent with this Growth Management Plan. For properties that are zoned inconsistent with the Future Land Use Designation Description Section but have nonetheless been determined to be consistent with the Future Land Use Element, as provided for in Policies 5.9 through 5.13, the following provisions apply: • RESPONSE _ The One Naples MUPD is not internally consistent with the Collier County Growth Management Plan. Refer to Stuart Exhibit 8 The One Naples Planning Analysis. Policy 5.6: New developments shall be compatible with, and complementary to, the surrounding land uses, as set forth in the Land Development Code. RESPONSE _The One Naples mixed planned development is not compatible with and complementary to the Gulf Shore Drive and Vanderbilt Beach Road neighborhoods. It is logically impossible for a project that doubles the density, increase height by 208%, incorporates 70% to 100% reduction in setbacks, features a 15-ft setback for a 1,066 linear foot +/- VBR and GSD 40 to 45-ft tall parking garage, and uses private rooftop recreation while not providing any functional common open space, to be found "complimentary and compatible" with surrounding land uses. The project fails to meet it's entitlement request criteria under LDC Section 10.02.13.B.5. Refer to the April 27, 2020 Stuart Opinion Letter and the July 15, 2020 Stuart Neighborhood Letter of Objection that are in the staff packet. Refer to Stuart Exhibit 5 Part Two Compatibility Standards and Exhibit 8 Part One The One Naples Planning Analysis. OBJECTIVE 7: Promote smart growth policies, reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and adhere to the existing development character of the Collier County, where applicable, and as follows: • RESPONSE _ The project introduces a Miami Beach -like Coastal Urban form into a SW Florida Naples Suburban form. Therefore it does not adhere to the existing Page 3 of 10 STUARTANDASSOCIATES Planning & Design Services character of the community. It is logically and visually impossible for a project that doubles the density, increase height by 208%, incorporates 70% to 100% reduction in setbacks, features a 15-ft setback for a 1,066 linear foot +/- VBR and GSD 40 to 45-ft tall parking garage, and uses private rooftop recreation while not providing any functional common open space, to be found to "adhere to the existing development character" of the Collier County neighborhood. The One Naples project's development character is not compatible and complimentary to existing development character and is not internally consistent with Objective 7 and Policies 7.3 and 7.4. Refer to the April 27, 2020 Stuart Opinion Letter and the July 15, 2020 Stuart Neighborhood Letter of Objection that are in the staff packet. Refer to Stuart Exhibit 5 Part Two Compatibility Standards and Exhibit 8 Part 8 The One Naples Planning Analysis. Policy 7.3: All new and existing developments shall be encouraged to connect their local streets and/or interconnection points with adjoining neighborhoods or other developments regardless of land use type. The interconnection of local streets between developments is also addressed in Policy 9.3 of the Transportation Element. RESPONSE _ The applicant is applying for a plat vacation for Gulf Shore Court and the western portion of Center Street (PL20200000368 is a Petition for Vacation). By definition and logic, the plat vacation demonstrates comprehensive plan Policy 7.3 inconsistency since it eliminates an existing interconnected street grid. The One Naples Master Plan reduces intersection connection separation from 565-ft +/- to 350-ft +/- along VBR to Southbay Drive. The One Naples Master Plan creates a new "4-leg" project Gateway aligned with the VBR parking garage and in so doing, creates unsafe project east bound left -out turning movements that conflict with VBR west bound to parking garage south bound turning movements. The project further aggravates traffic congestion with particular emphasis on east bound VBR turning movements. The project is not consistent with Policy 7.3. Please refer to the technical traffic impact documentation provide by William Oliver, PE. Policy 7.4: The County shall encourage new developments to provide walkable communities with a blend of densities, common open spaces, civic facilities and a range of housing prices and types. RESPONSE _ The project proposes to use rooftop recreational facilities to meet its open space requirement. The LDC 1.08.02 defines Open Space as Areas that are not occupied by buildings. Consequently, the One Naples project cannot provide minimum open space are required by the LDC. In addition, the project features a 15-ft setback with an 8-ft VBR/GSD pathway within the public ROW. One Naples uses a 10-ft Southbay Drive and Center Street setback with 5-ft sidewalk. The project's pathway standards are below the code required 21-ft pathway standard. The project is based on using private rooftop recreation open space while not providing any functional common open space. This leads to increased intensity appearance while diminishing pedestrian scale walkable environments. The One Naples project's development height, bulk and building form does not encourage "walkable communities with common open space". The project eliminates functional mixed uses at the VBR/GSD intersection and streetscape level, thereby creating a 1,000 foot non -active "dead zone". The project is not compatible and complimentary to the GSD and VBR streetscape, hinders a walkable neighborhood environment, is is not consistent with 7.4. Refer to the April 27, 2020 Stuart Opinion Letter and the July 15, 2020 Stuart Neighborhood Letter of Objection that are in the staff packet. Refer to Stuart Exhibit 9 Compatibility Standards. Page 4 of 10 STUARTANDASSOCIATES Planning & Design Services FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT - UNDERLYING CONCEPTS Management of Coastal Development: Two major coastal development issues in Collier County are the protection of natural resources and the balancing of risk in natural hazard areas. (VII) Extensive populated areas in Collier County are vulnerable to periodic salt -water inundation from tropical storms or hurricanes. It is extremely important that an acceptable balance between at risk population and evacuation capability be achieved. In addition, public and private investment in such vulnerable areas must be carefully considered. RESPONSE _ One Naples requests an increase of density of 232% in the Coastal High Hazard Zone, from 74 units to 172 units. The new 98 units are equal to 167 additional persons to be evacuated and to be serviced in a post -evacuation environment. The Applicant's proposed mitigation is to provide the county with 174 emergency cots and and a 16-ft. 2-axel enclosed trailer. The estimated value of the proposed mitigation is $36,320. The estimated range of economic benefits to the Applicant, is $9.8MM to $29.3MM (@ $100K to $300K per new unit). The One Naples project fails to "balance population risk and evacuation capacity", along with fair and effective mitigation. The One Naples map amendment is contrary to public health and safety interests. Attainment of High Quality Urban Design - The report of the Regional/Urban Design Assistance Team (R/UDAT) for the Naples area, dated April 1987, and subsequent recommendations of the R/UDAT Citizen Committee, provides another underlying concept. While the Growth Management Plan as a whole provides the requisite foundation for superior urban design through a sound framework for growth (protection of natural resources, thoughtful guidance of land uses, adequate public facilities and adequate housing), the Future Land Use Element provides several additional measures. (XXI) Major attention is given to the patterns of commercial development in Collier County. Concern about commercial development relates to transportation impacts both on a micro (access to road network) and macro (distribution of trip attractors and resultant overall traffic circulation) level and it relates to aesthetics and sense of place. Within the Transportation Element a commitment to adopt standards for road access has been accomplished through the Access Collier County has also adopted Design Standards for all commercial development into the Land Development Code. These Architectural and Site development standards include building design, parking lot orientation, pedestrian access, vehicular movement, landscaping and lighting. These standards will provide for quality development that is responsive to the Community's character. • RESPONSE _ The One Naples development standards significantly vary from similar neighborhood zoning districts and, as such, do not provide for "High Quality Urban Design". Page 5 of 10 STUARTANDASSOCIATES Planning & Design Services FUTURE TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT D.3.D -Transportation Element C. Perspectives: 1. Land Use Issues (VI) The Transportation Element is closely related to the Future Land Use Element. It has long been the pattern that the development of land necessitates improvements and expansion to the transportation system. The two elements are so closely tied, in fact, that changes or shifts in the land use patterns can drastically impact the performance of the roadway system. It is for that reason that the County requires most land development proposals (e.g., DRI, rezone and conditional use requests) to submit a Traffic Impact Statement. An analysis of the proposal's impact is prepared and submitted to the recommending and approving authorities. (VI) The County has also recognized the importance of good site planning as it relates to a project's ingress and egress from the major roadway system. Inadequate control of access points, median openings and signalized intersections can accelerate the deterioration of the systems overall level of service just as fast as the increases in traffic volumes. The County has developed and adopted policies to control the number, location and type of access points to the road network. These policies are based on the Collier County Access Control Policy (Resolution No. 92-42) and follow- up Resolution No. 01-247, and existing road and land use conditions, and are outlined in Section 4.04.02 of the Land Development Code RESPONSE _ The One Naples Master Plan reduces intersection connection separation from 565-ft +/- to 350-ft +/- along VBR to Southbay Drive. The One Naples Master Plan creates a new 114-leg" project Gateway aligned with the VBR parking garage and in so doing, creates unsafe project east bound left -out turning movements that conflict with VBR west bound to parking garage south bound turning movements. The project further aggravates traffic congestion with particular emphasis on east bound VBR turning movements. The project eliminates potential available and proximate C-3 neighborhood goods and services and therefore increases eastbound US 41 trips and trip lengths to obtain neighborhood goods and services. The project requires a parking space deviation to reduce the number of required parking spaces. These facts demonstrate that the project incorporates a very poor site plan as it relates to a project's ingress and egress from the major roadway system. Please refer to the technical traffic impact documentation provide by William Oliver, PE. TRANSPORTATION OBJECTIVE 3: Provide for the protection and acquisition of existing and future rights -of -way based upon improvement projects identified within the Five Year Work Program, Board approved development agreements, the Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization's (MPO's) adopted Long -Range Transportation Plan and/or similar Board approved studies, plans and programs. RESPONSE _ The One Naples 15-ft Vanderbilt Beach Road and Gulf Shore Drive (VBR and GSD) street setback effectively precludes any required future right-of-way and road expansion. Thus the development standard does not ensure the availability of land for utility facilities and is inconsistent with Objective 3 requirement to protect future right-of-way. Please refer to the technical traffic impact documentation provide by William Oliver, PE. Page 6 of 10 STUARTANDASSOCIATES Planning & Design Services TRANSPORTATION OBJECTIVE 4: Provide for the safe and convenient movement of pedestrians and non -motorized vehicles through the implementation of the Collier County Comprehensive Pathways Plan. RESPONSE _ The project requires a parking space deviation to reduce the number of required parking spaces. This demonstrates that the project does not advance pedestrian interests. The project further aggravates traffic congestion with particular emphasis on east bound VBR turning movements. The project eliminates potential available and proximate C-3 neighborhood goods and services and therefore increases eastbound US 41 trips and trip lengths to obtain neighborhood goods and services. These examples of transportation impacts demonstrate that the project does not advance pedestrian interests. Please refer to the technical traffic impact documentation provide by William Oliver, PE. The project is not consistent with Objective 4. Policy 4.7: The County shall incorporate bike lanes in roadway resurfacing projects as is physically possible and will not result in a safety or operational problem. Policy 5.1 (the Question for you to address is whether the Applicant complies with 5.1; if they do we need to not discuss 5.1): The County Commission shall review all rezone petitions, SRA designation applications, conditional use petitions, and proposed amendments to the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) affecting the overall countywide density or intensity of permissible development, with consideration of their impact on the overall County transportation system, and shall not approve any petition or application that would directly access a deficient roadway segment as identified in the current AUIR or if it impacts an adjacent roadway segment that is deficient as identified in the current AUIR, or which significantly impacts a roadway segment or adjacent roadway segment that is currently operating and/or is projected to operate below an adopted Level of Service Standard within the five year AUIR planning period, unless specific mitigating stipulations are also approved. A petition or application has significant impacts if the traffic impact statement reveals that any of the following occur: a. For links (roadway segments) directly accessed by the project where project traffic is equal to or exceeds 2% of the adopted LOS standard service volume; b. For links adjacent to links directly accessed by the project where project traffic is equal to or exceeds 2% of the adopted LOS standard service volume; and c. For all other links the project traffic is considered to be significant up to the point where it is equal to or exceeds 3% of the adopted LOS standard service volume. (IX) Mitigating stipulations shall be based upon a mitigation plan prepared by the applicant and submitted as part of the traffic impact statement that addresses the project's significant impacts on all roadways. RESPONSE _ The One Naples Master Plan applicant's proposed circulation improvement approach does not address the very important, north Vanderbilt Beach Road ROW traffic circulation problem; that is, Southbay Drive and other residential neighborhoods seeking to turn east towards US 41, with various resulting turning movements and traffic congestion concerns. The One Naples Master Plan reduces intersection connection separation from 565-ft +/- to 350-ft +/- along VBR to Southbay Drive, thereby reducing mitigation efficiency and traffic circulation safety. The One Naples Master Plan creates a new "4-leg" project Gateway aligned with the VBR parking garage and in so doing, creates unsafe project east bound left -out turning movements that conflict with VBR west bound to parking garage south bound turning movements. The project further aggravates traffic congestion with Page 7 of 10 STUARTANDASSOCIATES Planning & Design Services particular emphasis on east bound VBR turning movements and thereby reducing mitigation efficiency and traffic circulation safety. The project eliminates potential available and proximate C-3 neighborhood goods and services and therefore increases eastbound US 41 trips and trip lengths to obtain neighborhood goods and services. Please refer to the technical traffic impact documentation provide by William Oliver, PE. Refer to Stuart Exhibit 5 Part Two Compatibility Standards slides 31 and 32, and Exhibit 8 Part One The One Naples Planning Analysis slide 25 -16. The project is not consistent with Policy 4.7. TRANSPORTATION OBJECTIVE 7: Develop and adopt standards for safe and efficient ingress and egress to adjoining properties, and encourage safe and convenient on - site traffic circulation through the development review process. RESPONSE _ The One Naples Master Plan reduces intersection connection separation from 565-ft +/- to 350-ft +/- along VBR to Southbay Drive. In doing so, driver reaction time is reduced, with an associated lowering of traffic safety. The One Naples Master Plan creates a new "4-leg" project Gateway aligned with the VBR parking garage. The project creates new and conflicting ingress and egress turning movement conflicts. The project further aggravates traffic congestion. Please refer to the technical traffic impact documentation provide by William Oliver, PE. Refer to Stuart Exhibit 8 The One Naples Planning Analysis. The project is not consistent with Objective 7. Policy 7.1: Collier County shall apply the standards and criteria of the Access Management Policy as adopted by Resolution and as may be amended to ensure the protection of the arterial and collector system's capacity and integrity. • RESPONSE _ The One Naples Master Plan reduces intersection connection separation from 565-ft +/- to 350-ft +/- along VBR to Southbay Drive. The 215-ft connection spacing reduction lessens roadway capacity by lowering vehicle travel time with a subsequent increase in traffic congestion. Policy 7.2: The County shall require the submission of a neighborhood traffic impact assessment as a part of all rezone and conditional use applications. This study will analyze the proposed project's impact on surrounding neighborhood streets. RESPONSE _ The One Naples Master Plan TIS did not evaluate the proposed 215-ft intersection separation reduction to Southbay Drive. The One Naples Master Plan TIS did not fully evaluate the requests a new 114-leg" project Gateway aligned with the VBR parking garage and its left -out east bound turning movements that conflict with VBR west bound to parking garage south bound turning movements. Therefore the TIS did not properly analyze the proposed project's impact on surrounding neighborhood streets. Please refer to the technical traffic impact documentation provide by William Oliver, PE. The project is not consistent with Policy 7.2 Policy 7.4: The County shall encourage new developments to provide walkable communities with a blend of densities, common open spaces, civic facilities and a range of housing prices and types. • RESPONSE _ The project is based on a 15-ft setback VBR and GSD for1,066 linear feet +/- of parking garage at 40 to 45-ft tall, with a pathway design that does not meet 4.02.38 C-3 Mixed Use and PUD 2.03.06 21-ft wide pathway standards. One Naples Page 8 of 10 STUARTANDASSOCIATES Planning & Design Services uses a 15-ft setback with an 8-ft VBR/GSD pathway within the public ROW. One Naples uses a 10-ft Southbay Drive and Center Street setback with 5-ft sidewalk. The project does not incorporate the code required 21-ft pathway standard. The project is based on using private rooftop recreation open space while not providing functional common open space. This fact leads to increased intensity appearance while diminishing pedestrian scale walkable environments and neighborhood compatibility. The One Naples project's development height, bulk and building form does not encourage "walkable communities with common open space". The project eliminates functional mixed uses at the VBR/GSD intersection and streetscape level, thereby creating a 1,000 foot non -active "dead zone". The project is not compatible and complimentary to the GSD and VBR streetscape, hinders a walkable neighborhood environment, is is not consistent with 7.4. Refer to the April 27, 2020 Stuart Opinion Letter and the July 15, 2020 Stuart Neighborhood Letter of Objection that are in the staff packet. Refer to Stuart Exhibits 8 and 9. FUTURE CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT HURRICANE COASTAL MANAGEMENT GOAL 12: To Make Every Reasonable Effort To Ensure The Public Safety, Health and Welfare Of People and Property From The Effective of Hurricane Damage RESPONSE _ One Naples requests an increase of density of 232% in the Coastal High Hazard Zone, from 74 units to 172 units. The new 98 units are equal to 167 additional persons to be evacuated and to be serviced in a post -evacuation environment. The One Naples project fails to "make every reasonable effort to ensure public safety". The One Naples project fails to provide for fair and effective mitigation in a balanced manner. The One Naples map amendment is contrary to public health and safety interests and is inconsistent with Goal 12. Please refer to the testimony and documentation provided by Daniel Trescott, MUARP regarding hurricane evacuation and mitigation. Policy 12.1.2: Land use plan amendments in the Category 1 hurricane vulnerability zone shall only be considered if such increases in densities provide appropriate mitigation to reduce the impacts of hurricane evacuation times. RESPONSE _ One Naples will provide 174 emergency cots and and a 16-ft. 2-axel enclosed trailer. These items are for shelter and not for hurricane evacuation times. Hence, the One Naples does not provide appropriate mitigation to reduce the impacts of hurricane evacuation times and is inconsistent with 12.1.1. One Naples requests an increase of density of 232% in the Coastal High Hazard Zone, from 74 units to 172 units. The new 98 units are equal to 167 additional persons to be evacuated and to be serviced in a post -evacuation environment. The Applicant's proposed mitigation is to provide the county with 174 emergency cots and and a 16-ft. 2-axel enclosed trailer. The estimated value of the proposed mitigation is $36,320. The estimated range of economic benefits to the Applicant, is $9.8MM to $29.3MM (@ $100K to $300K per new unit). The One Naples project fails to provide for fair and effective mitigation in a balanced manner. The One Naples map amendment is contrary to public health and safety interests and is inconsistent with 12.1.2. Please refer to the testimony and documentation provided by Daniel Trescott, MUARP regarding hurricane evacuation and mitigation. Page 9 of 10 STUARTANDASSOCIATES Planning & Design Services Policy 12.1.13: The County shall continue to mitigate previously identified shelter deficiencies through mitigation from Developments of Regional Impact, Emergency Management Preparedness and Enhancement grants, Hazard Mitigation and Pre -disaster Mitigation Grant Programs funding, and available funds identified in the State's annual shelter deficit studies. • RESPONSE _ The Applicant has not provided a mitigation plan for county staff review. Hence there is no evidence that the cots and trailer is sufficient to mitigate for previously identified shelter deficiencies. The One Naples project is contrary to and is inconsistent with 12.1.3. Policy 7.2.1: The County shall apply the marina siting criteria contained in the Collier County Manatee Protection Plan (NR-SP-93-01), May 1995 in order to direct increased boat traffic away from sensitive manatee habitats. • RESPONSE _ The One Naples GMP map amendment has not provided information regarding its requested marina. The application violates FSS 163.3177(6) by not providing any data and analysis regarding marina siting, fuel dock location, seagrass baseline and impacts, manatee impacts, water quality baseline and impacts, and other key data and analysis. The One Naples map amendment is inconsistent with 7.2.1. Policy 7.2.2: Sea -grass beds shall be protected through the application of Policies 6.3.1, 6.3.2 and 6.3.3 of this Element. • RESPONSE _ The One Naples GMP map amendment has not provided information regarding its requested marina. The application violates FSS 163.3177(6) by not providing any data and analysis regarding marina siting and seagrass baseline and impacts. The One Naples map amendment is inconsistent with 7.2.2. Policy 10.1.5: New marinas shall conform to the following criteria: a. Marinas must provide vehicular parking and sewage pump -out facilities; b. Fueling facilities shall be designed to contain spills from on -land equipment and shall be prepared to contain spills in the water. c. Marina facilities must be accessible to all public services essential to ensure their safe operation. d. Marinas and multi -slip docking facilities shall prepare hurricane plans for approval which describe measures to be taken to minimize damage to marina sites and neighboring properties and the environment; this hurricane plan shall be reviewed and approved by the County. e. Dry storage should be encouraged over wet storage. RESPONSE _ The One Naples GMP amendment has not provided information regarding its requested marina. The application violates FSS 163.3177(6) by not providing data and analysis regarding marina siting, marina service access and circulation, dumpster service location, fuel dock location and fuel spill protection, water quality baseline and water quality protection and management, and seagrass baseline and impacts. The One Naples map amendment is inconsistent with 10.1.5. Page 10 of 10 STUARTANDASSOCIATES Planning & Design Services Exhibit Seven Street Vacation Value and Applicant Benefit Assessment CASE _ THE ONE NAPLES GMP MAP AMENDMENT, MUPD REZONING & STREET VACATION Page 1 of 4 STUARTANDASSOCIATES Planning & Design Services The Value and Benefit Analysis _ Applicant Obtains Est. $7.49MM In Unique Economic Benefits, Deregulatory Benefits and Substantial Density Increase STREET VACATION BENEFITS & APPLICANT DEVELOPMENT COMMITMENT ASSESSMENT, 09/14/20 MUPO Site Area 5.42 ac. Total ROW Vacation 0.79 ac. ROW Density 13 units Existing Site Area Without Street Vacation 4.63 ac. Existing Site Value Acq-,jisitian Value (Collier Prop. Appraiser) S 25,300,000-00 Price Per Ac. $ 5,464,362.85 per ac. Price Per SF S 125.44 psf ROW Value S 4,316,846.65 ROW Units (assume 16 DUS/ac.) 13 units ROW Unit Value $ 300.000.00 1 Est. ROW Unit Value S 3,792,000.00 TOTAL EST. ROW LAND & UNIT VALUE I S 8,108,846.65 DEVELOPER COMMITMENTS 174 Emergency Management Costs $180 per EST COSTS $ 31,320.00 16-f 2-axel Enclosed Utility Trailer $ 5,000.00 Traffic Signal $ 400,000.00 VBR Extended Garage Left Turn Lane $ 125,000.00 Garage Tech $ 50,000.00 South Bay Dr. Improvements (1) Gulf Shore Or Sidewalk (1) VBR 8-ft Multi -use Pathway (1) " Enhanced Landscaping1 Total Est. Developer Commitment Value S 611,320.00 (1) Identified Developer Commitments are generally required by LDC 6.05.00 Drainage & 6.06.00 Transportation; along with a marginal development/maintenance cost difference, are not credited to developer commitment est. value. BENEFIT TO DEVELOPMENT COMMITMENT ASSESSMENT ROW VALUE $ 4,316,846.65 Est. ROW Value (excludes new units) Net Benefit To The Applicant $ 3,705,526.65 BENEFIT TO DEVELOPMENT COMMITMENT ASSESSMENT ROW & NEW UNIT VALUE S 8 108 846.65 Est. ROW Value and 13 New ROW units 300K per Net Benefit To The Applicant S 7,497,526.65 APPLICANT EST. COSTS S 1,750,000.00 S 6,358,846.65 Page 2 of 4 STUARTANDASSOCIATES Planning & Design Services LDC 6.06.00 Transportation Sidewalks, Bike Lanes & Pathways 6.O602 - Sidewalks, Bike Lane and Pathway Requirements A, All developments must construct sidewalks, bike lanes, and pathways, as described below. For 100jeCtS -subject to architectural design standards, see LDC SeCLon 5.06.08 F. for related provislons. I. Sidewalks and bike lanes must be constructed within puU4c arid private rights -of -ways of easements, which are adjacent to the site prior to issuance of the first cerifficale of occupancy fal COnSh"chull durlivili4vid by a finall sobdi0stun piritz*lt" impruvunivin, u, sile d"WOUP111"Int plan, unless otherwise determined by the County Manager or designee, as foliaws: vpvica I Cross Sidewalks —Both sides' R e Bike Lanes —Both sides Section, 6 feet wide 5 feet wide Arterials and collectors X Locallinternal Accessway E3 X Except that only required on one side (closest to the development) where nglrlt-of-way is adjacent to. but not within, the subject development and except as, set forth below in this section. '- Untess, otherwise determined by the County Manageo, or doslgrieo, Mat the existing ROW cross-section is physicatly constrained or construct!Gn would result in unsafe condifians. Unless otherwise identilied On the CoFier County Comprehensive Pathways Plan Update, as amended, as a polential off-street pathway corridor, 2. Sidewalks and bike lanes must de canstrucled wi hin. public and private rights -of -way or easements which are internal to the site, as follow,,;: typical Cross Sidewalks --Bath sides ' e Bike Lane—Uvth sides Section 6 feet wide 5 feet wide Afterials and collectors X Lotal/Inlemal Accvssway Page 3 of 4 STUARTANDASSOCIATES Planning & Design Services I - Except that only required on one side (closest to the development) where right-of-way is adjacent to, but not within, the Subject development and except as set forth below in this section, - U nle* otherwise determined by the County Manager, or designee, that the existing ROW cross-section is physically consiraineo or construction would result in. unsafe conditions. " - For development projects seeking approval of a final subdivision plat or site development plan of 4 or fewer oweiling units per gross acre and wh.We 15 Of fewer dwelling unills, front or) a ROW that terminates in a cul-de-sac, then sidewalks wiff only be tequIed on one side of the ROW and not around the circumference of the cul-de-sac, - Prior to the issuance of individual certificates of occupancy, the required sidewalks along the individual parcels frontage shall be constructed. c, - Prior to the issuance of 75 percent of the certificates at occupancy aultiotreed by a final subdivision plat, site improvement or site development plan, all sidewallts arto hilke lanes shall be constructed, UMOSS Otherwise determined by the County Manager or designee, I Required pathways. as identified in the Collier County Comprehensive Pathways Plan, must be constructed a minimum of 12 feet in width, wilt" public and private rights -of -way or easements, which are adjacent to or internal to the site. Prior to issuance of the first permanent certificate of occupancy for construction, authorized by a final subdivision plat, stlie improvement, or site development plan, all requifea pathways shalt. be provided, Jnress otherwise determined by the County Manager or designee, G 0 L L:. R C" 0 _''N I V I A FV:-' 0-).M-N GOOL" ♦ Major Collector and A r t ar; a Is Page 4 of 4 2 N 2 0 Q m Co 0 0 Q CID 7 71: m v w a� 4-� o4-1 i u v o o o Ln v v ed cc 75 cc o z� I y a O I M N O _ O M w Z C d -a_ O co G :3 — � cti O C� I C C NLJL. O CLi O E pz°,oar E o Lo cn o C") V LL06 c o U C")0 LL m C M Q a i � 2 z .U) cn J cc O 'a Li C LL ,� L 2 O C fn -O O O . ++ iLL i�� p C')U) O N N r J p C C M LL p =_ _ a O *' C H C cr M" co L Q)NCV) fA Oa O O Q' V LL LL + U C U C O U C,) C Q. egg a n. LLL0aa�.N� 000 a QoodoLLiLL' � � o � o � v 1 v v O 0 N o ro c Q a) . Q m v o a) O ca G� 4� — c c Q O Caw a U� m N O C U J (D a O U Lu , a U ro LL +�-ro Q Q N Cn Z � +.-, _ 2 �z Cry a)� O�C.o� �Oc al •4J z a U ~ N a i X 3 E �W-paM: m 3: Q N > E O O W cca � - I_t_ i CSC cu< �cLL �� O -� E ~ U Z o4- Vo o o in- °- Oono?-_ a� C cv o p O U E o6 ro0 O .QOA co �+ cc 0 �_'�, `� o� a) O CC 0 iJ Zm In c° C io Q ro o?S C� C Cl) 0) Q. E w p � 'a) n N Z O z r6 m U) 0 i � GE N v O a2 C/)z�Om •i m p .+- U U (n C z am c own i •cc 0 _� C,5W +� _ Z �' p 5 � U) Q i Q f� N I U 2 06 �IU)p (n 0 oO a LL U 0),-� C) i I Q [i < c r6 NCC (n �® LJI U CL �a� m o (6 a U) �o LamU EwCC c .> .J L 0 b a D °- . a) LL .� E c� c.c c= 0�0 ro v ro N -� Q o f- cn ro m m m to a p� o Uco ro[C +, 0� Q W ap O—,Q Q ro =rom�,m > i Z IpCp u)0a- ro ro � w z_ C) < -i �— LL m q to 1 1 0T 71 F* 4 o�_ U� rn�� c� c �`� U m M U c N tit' , Q co °c � r�r Q ! CO - omU N Gv 0 O r' C � U m L W j I, v O CD U OU_SCf� � C D O OUP z D LD c c Ln LO T O = .0 fn O 0 U U U U O 1 c m 03 a , I� {� +i _ CD _ N low ar • _,ram , f 1- Ctf V -j V 1 0 LL'' 1L1 0 0 0 cn oW z W AL W Ac W V cv M x LU 0 0 0 M Q �J co m CD w N O Q 00 N 14-4 O O 14-4 c� O U V\ p Q � � ct .,� ct •ap F° I . C O U) un UO Qn 4-1 C7' C7" �I u 0 O t4 R 11-. •'� 4—+ C) o � u �O o o � U-) C) W �4 Al A, 0 75 v 0 u oc LL m v. 4-0 0 M v 0 CL E 0 0 Q ios�j v u 0 @ 11 11 \ 1 'S u N `Ctt O wV � U C5 cu - 3 C7 N �. ay : I ;_� vJ r w o� nO 1� O U +, u i� O O C7 CL) C1� � X W to O oc cz L/i O z° W l/1 4J , L Ln N 4j V) �1— O tA co 0 E c •x G co N r-1 'c O 00% % u u V � u b-C 4-1 � w o f.-�� 4-1 o aL)ral `n .0 • , ,—� j cn un O ctS 5 C u o K 0 u U0 U0 � O -T5 U o � � a �W 7 v u � O X 1 - l Ga A ®. r a p � O ti of v � � cn • ti � � o U U 24 bA U � u .- Qn Cn 4-1 O � u di CA W cn U cn N J) _ A CD Ir O V ra J m a-.+ ro V vi O 06 r Vl LL z° N tj a% O 0 U Q� Q 4" N CO Ln .4 fT -, T 11' r 1 -7 r i '1 9- l 01 iI lbll ! I I t.,l u. fJ 1 1J 1t rJ .L •_I L f�. 7f1 Qh $ I a l I I ICI d 12 0tpilll lalI C wi—jA.0 IN t�t L,7 9 Z 0 E 4-4 ti O � O � Q r►i � •� cn y- 4-1 1 u r- a � � +-J W 4-1 V CL N U4-1 rsl E cu 4-1 6 1--1 75 cc ro Ln W u � cc Q u o o N 3 N N .-, C.7 U N un u O OO W o' U C-� O O U _ 0 N u cn tA �i i 00 n a� 00 �wo000 o.,0 ter+ cry Al 1 11111 � 4 � ��Nr�rrrrrrrrf �rrrrrrrrrrrr •,� i G4 V Q 1iL � o � o �4-A �jZt 4-0 C) � � 4-0o Ln u ,1 ro LA , N , -aj ran fN n• � �� c r O LL _ tA A� 1 ` I+� cc w� OY C _ to C yi N i m .v v + w �• UD 3 I u Q N ^ �) LL m O Z t-1 rn I N o � w � H u 0 � o 0 4-j x C C) +' u CIS I--i ti 4 4-1 CP 141� Z a� o-61 a U) o G G U AL V � a ali...a — Lim a M Q ca V m V C� G CO Q 0 co Q cn •N 0 z o 4 a� W U � v u -,b.0 jo 4 O m di O � V v z v b0 O p, + ��Z � O �-4� �Z N 4-4 a w w Q 0 -j CZ v O ti •v � O C o U W Q -�' 06 0 N c� V Cl� O U � V o i o U c Cc 4U cm 1� L L E 0 .�}O —' CD o I�- Od� Z CD (D L o ° M � p � t/'1 Qj z s m 0 rya 5 T O Q co N T O a ct c� � O �" Ln U � +► cn 4-jUO 3 U - x 4-j 75 V '� • �4-1 �. UU 4-j 75 ro U 'Z� _ X o Ln •� Ln ct a b� ct ' U, u a� u � _ � 75 U 75 x O >�, 75 ct I � o ,_..r b un w N N co N o� x F� n, x 0 z V 4-+ N V) Ln to G 2 0) LOA (r) 2 O Q co �p 32 CU� 12 E2 t�,,�t 'p,• ECG' .. 1;N V7 t0 ■omr■m a on me CL on CD m C) 0 Q M N d m u NL g V vi l.1 O O N VI .+ 1. w O00 V1 O •e. N N, L y L 1.1 7 l7p�^, rn 00 c �- in CA V U, 'S V v 17� El j m's.', ��m' �'� �+A >� p SE n O� V1 00 n ��m 0 ^ g w w V 0 w p L I V) E W A CP O O A u W v �' c p d pL C O P� 0 �1 u 'm c V w L M p/ L CE I A A A. A�A1 LU N a-j I CL L i 0 CO y N Ew�; u Y LL M O aj a) Lr N a o v O � O rYa a R of a � N a � C N (a O aJ Y Ln Cn (0 ` u _ l7 J O l7 a X 0) � •c v > a, v a J L C V1 O N d O C1 �v wD W Q. ra N Q N 3 IY a U v C�1 a1 0 a C Q a1 0 K a: S In i N E N N E 7 m cc Y I�(ra� Q VI G O �n a i per• � � � 2 O� c Op > JO o $ J a O C cal N O 1 N O a v w al a a a 00 �- N u' 41 -1� N (31 Qj m 6,0 aj -i�a 4� eL � • • � O CL U' bq '- ! -ram c/� 0.� • � � � v � � ��vto z M o 0 U) Q t m n N t9 4-1 I u W cr bL O u j A 0 N H h CRM U) U U co Q rn N 0 U) Q a o� a� O � O •ti '� Q v 4-1 3 v � G • � 4) V V J , � •�{�l ��iii � � V W � O X U G O U O O o � � � v � CS ^ C t7o' � O �7 `' Lq 1= N a� US o cn � G � G ryi cz N o E U m O O N N (Z Z cz E cn o N • � 0 J Q =3 v/ O Q N 4-1 E cz O U N Q F 0 >, a-1 •r G 70 uJ V • 0 L cz CZ ^_\ vi - ^, V) O 4-J o N (D +1 E o> E G od a) (Z U > O 4-1 C: M 3 CIO p � I V ++ cn N 0 c� co w Q Z g I— Z w 0 Z w Q i- �w H co m0 a X° wa ca o s c�} W a) O C L c a�i a) U ;O _ a) co p L O + 0 X O L •p L +�.. cti LO w (nm c `z x•L E m E C Cn m C a) 'D 0 O a) m L C L E E .n(no ca � C coL j . OE�a) r L 'OD O O p_.- 'O +O_ j �3 o E'n�° �o >EC) ca M 0 c a N L Q O 0— Q Z O 0 N m0 a) (.5 C L U O (a C_ +' U C a) U) •_ (C +•• L vj (n .O O as c L O 0 .) L E •� L -C U OU X N +L V O C O C: L i) 3 i a) O ._ m C 4-- 0) O O U c �s ro Qom° `� ° �n °'roE�a. Q a(„o'0 a�ip� m�ac)E —o a)O N �c _�`�- U��O x L Q a) O (n to O U, a� Via) Q + EN,icti` �� O' °)C0c "O p N 'D o N C w 07,0 -O p c: U cU O U -(,0 +(n } D = U—En C C C O O 4� N L °ri a) -Ocd ,O a) a)E� U0—0 CO iO -c�O Ca) + 7 (d cd U n c n ca ;,, -, u —> E aa) E `t in c E .Q-o 0) 4- � Q.- ' � Ci C c O .c Q) + (n U �_ n a E •E ccv c c��0 "O' M ' QJ a) o c +LJ (� N (A .! c_ } + = cd O a) > O a) °> aia0 V 3 a) E� E L cn o Q °'aci ca Qa) >� a) o oFL-�Q Q v CC Era -t'�� c U .� (n CLP 00cnin T °c�ic n cv.o ci-6Li � n 0 � '~' 4-j V .� o � � •ate ap .4-j ° --� d A, A. rn N c � O .� .O Q U O i 3 Q a � U Q .Q 41 = O Y ate) CL N E c6 E( E0 ca i c� a 4-J O C CO cd 0 N C V o� D E UO� a) c Co fa co o U V u° O Q J N cr 51 �L Id Q O Q N Q D o NpUp �p = LO 'O M q U�U C7� coco ` I` O 0) O L C C oa U cLi U ca U N Y CO s m N L C .I h V Cl� V CJSLU Q N Q ON 4-J L1 O O OO V1OMtt 1� NNOtn V1 N O�V7 'C f� N �D O N 10 N N V to N n N n OD f, Mcp t� 1C M D O O M 0� N N N N N O ` 04BZ222000 V C C C C C C C C C C v x LU O LnMOCP v NOD co 00000 m Ommm OOPm 4j - T O rn rn O Ch O� m m CT • N ' W , N ❑ �O w ❑ W O O O > L O OO L ~ 2 N In o U M w, n M p0 Oi a.. O -a U - U o=- L � U vc c -O Q L dS O C. ♦� co Q C L L Q up E 0 a °o c_ a m r- L o m E n o -e m i L Ql Ul N 4/ .� to • N N C1 t m N m Qi L L �✓ �.�.1 �C,ma»>V,�--u z co N m m co c ' O L Z t� C 7 N N Ca O p 'D al Q� O O oo ca - n o L inc'3� N @ V 0 c O O a� uj E n o W N 0 n� ? NACL W FD a0i 2 a) C L _N w CL a Z o m d N O o ct CL o _�c .- U C N W N *' • Q J ECL �� a 0 =W aka .c2 bL w0 F �o aQ ct ct C) 4-5 U Q s r- N -o a) C LO Co T CO T �in -0 Cl) LO N T li r- L 6i 0 C N Lo E L r 7 r N N C;) to ti � c 00) O� C�� m r CO C N 4 In o N O0) Or C N a0i°i LO 0) U �ci 4) 0 Q' Lo O - C C O C) c '° 00)) w Tom. cn � o a�a�o2 (rCcIZIL OcV�cip N C ,,, E W.0oc0 C1 O .Q'o N ` C N O N 0 d 0`~0�3 3 C O O J m .c E O Exx 'v E N N C o>EpN _C u��i3om L z�ao.a}. c0 �z°a)c 30cop ED « •- N C CL c�U`p c�0 2�mv�_ c CL D N 0 .0 0 > — M, � V .0 C E U a O N E f o ?'2 O O O ` N V CL. -0 w C 0 c0 00 O C � U L C pM.L. 3 3:Y , C o U 0 N 0)L EQ-o0rn V5 a� OLD) C: cli Q) ' E •i Q� E E O lJ O N i Q� L U- O z Ln w O m all O Y ++ Cco 2 0 *� N 0 UO 3 QE M Q aj ' v Qom-_ . Q.0_ C O ' > O U O M Q) y u O c ❑ ro o ❑� c r c a) ca O� UcN co O O O ca o- V L .+COO m0) -° .6 r. c c'c n V o acm,) Z iC a) o wo =_ coo) v�.(j 7Lv oo ao aoc =CLCC O O Q) 1 O 0 `� *' U T «- ca L (n p ca C ,U..- O U aia�a> , >,� c �cc�, coO7+ ON caC, C �cOna,� C0c Q) C 0- . = ca a) a ca m � v cLa -o '- (1) �; o C: m a w oho ��- ocn "OIL o cCL n co � 5 o : ° �,' o Q� ��a_ O � L .. O c C U U r-D U. a) C M'- O U +�+ -0 m C T cc E a>c� o a�i c a) -0 camo E'cvo -o m o � ri'�_ �:_L L O N >1 0 7 Q L U O a .-L Q C1' O= Y, (� Q O W co Z' c O __ Q N U coO � E " U C ca EO'� c C Q 0 ;' m ro 0 v Co cac *. .ca'E � co ca r �°' Z .NaO c cca o CO co„ Q CO.� N-0 c o c Ua)o fca® o x c �C +c a C N -C1. CU 'CcW = (U.O N CO O O a N4i CO1 Q Q) > �• O O N- U ❑ C M C0) Q L a a 2 OO )W 'I "O oa_) O _—O a -0 N W , *EL > QU _ Nto O > c > � 0 L) a -0 , CA b.o Q u -1 X w � CL aJ N fa Q O N O V O ro i O z Q NI Qu E 4-0 E V Qj 0- 0 a) 0 z O Q It co tA O O c U Q v c � Ln •c lJ = C � �n Q v d � 00 3 a z 0 CL x E 2 -1 i� L Ali LO m I 5 V 7 I' J' f � a �} M, mr 0 z Cn U r h U a� P k� '{ b-0 bA W ,L) 0 rJD C0 9 O o � N M m aa) N c C U W cd a o c� U 0 J r +� f) N� O) V- n O D(D J U' X N L6 $ ; : Q + c_ J CC Tr06\`: O O LL L y U +. � U) N O I m N N coLO N ' I.iJ N X N O_ 0 V% C -� 0 � '� r : 0 N L LL N m I r 0 to M T I D Nl �i i N NI r N `� i O .0 ca O (06 () N\ C 3 3�co mtocoU- '�n{—o° P 9 C V# k k 42 t` N N O i A + O$� r` vi I rn � o` o v I 10m Co(D J NO 3 �a F- m o 'w 06 rn c Y I (0 IL � LL m O co �M 0 a m o m a C U U iv C ro CMoOC LL U o O N 'o C7 $ H � O ! U N 0 t` m N E c I O �•� m� tO m > I ; s I d NCm5 Z W o a) N Y 'O 'v\i o ro m C O N U N Q o � �. OI r : r- N to Lo ui p 'c $ r L) n. NI NI a11 a) N >12 a OI 3 3 cYi o' � 0 cr o o ° �° HHmmC7 r M Y O NC D M m 00 T T 0 Z O Z co C VI 1 C_ c ,E 00 E N 7- ON r� — C: 17 � m a� ca J cu LL cu :1 o m LIN N Q 7� 75 N � C! C! — m o cu Ow w a O4-0 m m �Mmm V) O = Z � i O (1� � o 0 4-j 0 a � � a ca �44 Q 4-+ U N � • (�' ^ ^�,, W Q un L , 1� ^ rrMr� 4 • O (n w U 4� N Q `TJ m d n g 0 IE M, x O z 40 1� 1 +$ N 1 ' t 1 -"" O r` r u Q t7' � Ucr�o•� o 00 �, bf� O �w J � � N � O � ^ 0 -4 X Ln W p � O Q (3) x U ca tA O � � w o � . r.., Ln a :4-0 Q ra V 4-0 O ^0 W m H Ol O J O O Lr) III C;)I m 0 L y-- L ry tA N EL m Z i O aj a m V ON . %. O u w � � a � � H O � � 75 o U r—+ r_- O ,a • u .F Eft V 0 N Lj N 0 U 0 Q c co co c m m m a) .O C a� cz 0 U- 70 a) M a o_ �a �ro as Q) o O U ) Q ca p _ U ri s •�'•� U O • •Q .O Q) Q) CO U Q) 1 a) NCl) Oo • s Q) ZE �� coQ) M mam o 2Q) •� co N •� I ■� i cz70 L W O E O _U E�� ■• _ � U � a W > rr Q) 0).z a) :73 Q) 1 m a) X N c UJ r 0 U) Q) Q o M QU a crj Q) U U CZ co Q a) C U O) QQj Q :N N Q a) O "�� o o a m Q) o Q) Q) aaico� 0-0a) ° 0-0 C) 0 O BLS U) U .� cz N a O O E- co co Y � O � Q) —a)o i o C/) c o ° Q o Q) CV Q) 0 N 0O N U U Q '- Q Z a 0 CO oc00)aQ) �CY)N� CQ QS U O � o � a N a N U , U) m CQ O U as n Q a) CQ co N 00 -c-- .O cz a) � O O Q) Q) QQ) o oaCQ Q) cp C Q) Q) X .CO a) Q• N O c U CU � U � Q c� CO :3a)w cu a)f�s � � U c U ° � Q..� ~ O Q) � � O 6co U c� �g o ° U M .� Q) cz (i C/)� � (i Q) Qo co � Q) C6 OO J � 0 0 0 d' o oa ro (D O -r- ,U i 4 ,O oa O O O O Q U s O 0 c a)�� a C: Q) z 4-, z c p U ocu U O C o Y o OQ�Q a 0)-W(D) Q) a) �O Z co - O L �O O tz- v O M 0 N LO N O T ro C) 0 U) Q C 0 ro O m I M N O Q) 0) Q) c C C N U) i a) Y � � ro ro m a'> � vi cE-o00 0) C Cl �> 0 a) c L U +Q. U O O �-0 ro75 c 0 EoZcE +, E E C: ro - ro o ro >_ ro w a) �' E� U -- > 3 Y Q 75 C 6 U ro •- O ro .0 + O U ro ro C (UO L C m Y ro L U-0 N�'0 a) a) a) I O a U a D C a) a) 4-, a) U Cl ro-0 o v c Eo_.0roa) N>c O E o E w 0 U O 0 C 0 0 C V)cro�o Q a)-.0` a)o-0 U �'' E ow -c ro U) 'a ~-C ` EMl CNO 0— O Lo m C) c ro C 0 0 N o_ cn U ` U CL Y a) C '> U) 4- N> O C U OL to O_ ro4� ao Cro cd 1>. - ui Q 4- 3 1 > Y O Cd o N OC -0 C +' O ro +-' Y ro Cl 0 Q m o a Q E-0 W Y C Em roa) C)o (n 0 a>i aEi N 0�•x �� T C 0 Yro (n ro ro Y C1 _U C i ro N r ro ro a) O U C .0 E O N O - = a) U- O U c I— OQ 0 co Y C O -C O °)cc m cn a) U U to ro U a) M -0 a) ro c 0 0 N O L a- c Coroa)Nra > a) Y U) I a) co) "- N Co 0 o 0 ai O U '- CO n a U) .v-> > C O Y -r Cl ro +' a)� m E .; y in a) O a) +� -0 U T a) N a)0Ea-C 6 YO a N a) a T COU E ca w +O O 0 z > -0 c 0 w � m O a) a�i °DTD ro c O ro N o ro t' Q a) N O U Yro 'y ro U N (n 0 a) ro 0 -0 ro M ro m to N o -O N roE-rocoo c �aa)nrn o a a) C to m a) ro n O U C U N 0 m < (n o I W -0 a) C U) - a) a) mto-ixE Ca)cE-0 C (n o � a O ro c 0 ro > o _r -0 ro CQ� E i- m a ��E �'a 0 C O O O ro U r U U ro O o U OC_�; C U C 0 .ro QoE C C C U v N C. C O U Q �o m 3 •.� E cv cc y 0 CD W 'a L �>'j N W C (/j E > V 4, _+ O 0 m 04� U •O y A CD 0 0 O y CC 0) eocl)c = a aoi .0 CD c .O a a ai m Q m o E f C. cv Cc �-% C o a) 06 Z E .0 0 0 O t0� p •� O O CD fn .0 F- •1•• C C CC O Q.._ N O C O (�C U +, LO cu to o to a) IC _ G. M +�-• Z Y w (V V N 3 T O*' 0 .UQ "E min Cl) co a M c^ W x N oa ( � z U � C O O 4 E E 41 � � O V Q i O ou CO U ro ag aU H m C U) cz �a Q 4- 0 O c� O N LO T O T N L I— v .41 0 N LO N 0 r U) U O U) Q C M m � II 41 N C Y - O N O 0 N W � Alp c G! J c Im J V �2 N '� Z cu C a= v v v A cu R x j m F L� ft c o, �7 C m N N N Cl. m O c o o �, v c,tm v p a c LL ca Q O j o M p 4 v c o, M o v o E rev o m ' v V '0v W a c h a s � R = LLto = Ln l / h ti L: - O CL V U a c n a � a c .c a C M may' O Ra V I 0 o c 4 I .O � c J G1 W 1 0 0 a 34 / • ��crr V f 1� - o 0 ~ m ai Q. � EV G i X y W 1-- v N a O N LO N O U) m �s �U O CO Q .0 c c� N m m I- F O z cn I- v � o m N m c C O t c Q T M1O L ? N N d � x d � M • M N J1 i c f ' a J r, Oe Q tb L O ^ o tn v� i � o 00 M ' O V M q* C O Q � O ca CL Y LO N v r F N 4" cz O Q �ob y L d o CM 2 a n Wz y m ' '� Q �E LU o a v U 0 oC 0t3 ' M N cz CV)m m E m .� Z -a �, E o O c U v to cc 0 N N c -2 > to C = N W y X Ty K O O dl O N c � v L / W 0 3 r v Co N O a � 41 W _ m o m ,2 ^` V J v f° -o L j c O �i c6 �3m LLvoo t-Z i O - a ,Ni O H N 4-0T_ O cn '" .� '0 l) N .0 m O > C v V Q C O1 l/71 c uj p1 _ m L O EL u. Y in '� C x a� o a ooapv_ � LU �°a m ocl7°Tro m U 0 O cn rp H c 3 w �� •F� c J~ maain amu O Rol ^ry �a H V v 9 o� N cu a Subject: Proposed One Naples Project Collier County Planning Commission Board of County Commissioners Re: Proposed One Naples project Dear Commission and Commissioners: The Pelican Bay Foundation (Foundation) recognizes and values the importance of redevelopment to maintain property values and the quality of life in our community. We appreciate both the multiple and complex considerations of the criteria provided for in the land development code, the comprehensive plan amendments, the rezoning requests, etc., and, further, respect the concerns, objections, or support, of various community interest groups, individuals, or businesses. The Foundation expressly neither supports nor opposes the proposed One Naples project. In fact, we appreciate the open communication with which Stock Development has approached this proposed project. However, because properties within Pelican Bay have been cited as compatibility justifications for the One Naples project, the Foundation believes it has an obligation to clarify how Pelican Bay differs from the area to the north of Vanderbilt Drive since it is not part of Pelican Bay. Pelican Bay was created years ago as a comprehensive, well -planned, mixed -use Planned Unit Development, and it is vastly different from the neighborhoods to our south, north, and east. The planning, the PUD regulations and the applicable private declarations and covenants that govern Pelican Bay and have controlled its development include a myriad of factors, controls, constraints and planning techniques to regulate and manage development. The allowance of high-rise construction and mixed -use development are regulated and controlled by multiple different and important factors and controls. To compare only height in Pelican Bay to other areas, without also considering the overall planning and multiple other constraints that apply to Pelican Bay, seems like selective cherry picking. It is not an apt comparison. For example, the maximum height of principal structures within the Pelican Bay PUD is two hundred (200) feet above finished grade, provided that minimum yards must be maintained, from tract or development parcel lines, right-of-way lines and/or the edge of the gutter of a private road, of fifty (50) feet or one-half (1/2) the height of the structure, whichever is greater. Simply stated, Pelican Bay is a well -planned, well -organized and well -run large-scale development that should not be compared or used in a comparative analysis to justify any position (for or against) relative to development outside of its jurisdictional boundaries unless the entire Pelican Bay regulatory scheme of controls and constraints are similarly included. We wish you well in your deliberations of the value and appropriateness of the proposed One Naples project for the Vanderbilt Beach neighborhood. Sincerely, Jivw Hoppe ioaa.d t- President / COO Pelican Bay Foundation 6251 Pelican Bay Blvd. Naples, FL 34108 239-260-8460 direct 239-597-6927 fax Daniel D. Peck J.D., Member FL Bar Meredith Peck Ralston J.D., Member FL Bar Peck & Peck, P.A. Attoraae�s at Law 5200 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 101 Naples, Flor.da 34103 E-mail: meredith@peckandpecklaw.com February 24, 2021 VIA COURIER District 1 District 2 _ - - Collier County Board of County Commissioners District 3 3299 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 303 District Naples, Florida 34112 district 6 Re: One Naples PL20190000696 PL20190000697 Dear Commissioners: Telephone: (239)263-9811 Facsimile: (239)263-9818 RECEIVED FEB 2 4 2021 OFFICES OF COLLIER COUNTY' BOARD OF C OUNP-ty COMMIS s101 ERE 4.4-AID b�L/V� kr This firm represents Vanderbilt Palms Condominium Owners Association, Inc. (the "Association"). On behalf of the Association, I enclose a letter of support for Stock Development's proposed One Naples project, which is being considered at the Board of County Commissioners Hearing scheduled for March 1, 2021. The Association requests your vote of approval for this project and that you consider its enclosed letter when voting. Sincerely, Meredith Peck Ralston Enclosure cc: Board of Directors, Vanderbilt Palms Condominium Owners Association, Inc. VANDERBI.LT PALMS CONDOMINIUM OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC. 260 Southbay Drive Naples, Florida 34108 February 24, 2021 VIA COURIER Collier County Board of County Commissioners Commissioner William McDaniel Commissioner Penny Taylor Commissioner Burt Saunders Commissioner Andy Solis Commissioner Rick LoCastro 3299 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 303 Naples, Florida 34112 RE: One Naples PL20190000696 PL20190000697 Dear Commissioners, Please accept this letter of support from the Vanderbilt Palms Condominium Owners Association, Inc_ for Stock Development's proposed One Naples project scheduled for consideration at the March 1, 2021 Board of County Commissioners Hearing, One Naples provides an opportunity for much needed improvements to our area, including the beautification of our entry road, Southbay Drive; Vanderbilt Beach Road traffic flow enhancements; a substantial reduction in the number of vehicle trigs on our roadways from what the current C-3 zoning allows; and advanced drainage infrastructure to address long-standing drainage problems in our area. Blight has historically been our backyard, and the alternative we are facing under the existing commercial zoning is an intensive beach -end entertainment and retail center that will result in nuisances, more traffic, and more bodies on the beach. One Naples will bring beautiful architecture, public art, public spaces, and landscaping we can be proud of. We commend Stock Development for listening to cur concerns as well as the local communities' concerns which resulted in Stock Development reducing the project density from 300 units to 172 units. We also commend Stock Development for agreeing to reduce the number of floors in the towers by 7 stories, and designing the buildings in a way that promises circu--ation of air and light and protects view corridors. These commitments came out of several community workshops and neighborhood outreach meetings, including 6 separate meeting with the Vanderbilt Palms Condominium Owners Association, Inc. As our neighbor, we have been delighted by Mr. Stock's ongoing outreach and commitment to a truly first class redevelopment of our corner. Approving One Naples will be a great decision for our neighborhood. We respectfully request your vote of approval for this one -of -a -kind project. Sincerely, Daniel R, Clark, President of the Vanderbilt Palms Condominium Owners Association. Inc. FilsonSue Subject: Location: Start: End: Recurrence: Meeting Status: Organizer: Zoom Meeting: Commissioner McDaniel re: One Naples Zoom Link Info Below Thu 2/25/2021 3:00 PM Thu 2/25/2021 4:00 PM (none) Accepted Richard Yovanovich EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Coleman, Yovanovich & Koester is inviting you to a scheduled Zoom meeting. Topic: RDY - One Naples Time: Feb 25, 202103:00 PM Eastern Time (US and Canada) Join Zoom Meeting https://zoom.us/i/92272565713?pwd=cnprYWRmNVIkU2MOLzIDQkhSVEsyUT09 Meeting ID: 922 7256 5713 Passcode: 107866 1 FilsonSue Subject: Special BCC Meeting re CM Recruitment and One Naples Location Location: BCC Chambers Start: Tue 12/15/2020 11:00 AM End: Tue 12/15/2020 12:00 PM Recurrence: (none) Organizer: McDanielBill 9:00 — BCC/Mental Health Workshop 11:00 — BCC/Special Meeting to consider selecting an Executive Recruitment Firm as well as determining a date and location for the One Naples item FilsonSue Subject: Location: Start: End: Recurrence: Meeting Status: Sarah Spector & other re One Naples https:Hus02web.zoom.us/j/83532712818?pwd=OTdNcmIZaGlvTkpnekJIYIJNWDVhZzO9 Thu 2/25/2021 1:00 PM Thu 2/25/2021 2:00 PM (none) Accepted Organizer: FilsonSue Required Attendees: Sspector@ralaw.com; greg@stuarturbandesign.com; ckasper@hullinc.com; jcleveland@e-wasteonline.com; mcdanielbilll@gmail.com Optional Attendees: McDanielBill zmMeetingNum: 83532712818 Sue Filson is inviting you to a scheduled Zoom meeting. Join Zoom Meeting https://us02web.zoom.us/i/83532712818?pwd=OTdNcmIZaGIvTkpnekJIYIJNWDVhZzO9 Meeting ID: 835 3271 2818 Passcode: 572801 One tap mobile +13017158592„83532712818#,,,,,,0#„572801# US (Washington D.C) +13126266799„83532712818#,,,,,,0#„572801# US (Chicago) Dial by your location +1 301 715 8592 US (Washington D.C) +1 312 626 6799 US (Chicago) +1 646 876 9923 US (New York) +1408 638 0968 US (San Jose) +1 669 900 6833 US (San Jose) +1 253 215 8782 US (Tacoma) +1 346 248 7799 US (Houston) 877 853 5257 US Toll -free 888 475 4499 US Toll -free 833 548 0276 US Toll -free 833 548 0282 US Toll -free Meeting ID: 835 3271 2818 Passcode: 572801 Find your local number: https://us02web.zoom.us/u/kbC*S36Rn6 Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. 3 FilsonSue Subject: Location: Start: End: Recurrence: Organizer: Rich Yovanovich, Keith Gelder & Brian Stock re One Naples Conference Call: 239-280-5280 Code: 0116456# Wed 4/22/2020 10:00 AM Wed 4/22/2020 10:30 AM (none) McDanielBill Rich, along with Keith Gelder and Brian Stock would like to speak with Nick and Leo regarding an update on One Naples. Availability: • Wednesday (4/22) 10:00—12:00; 2:30, 3:30 • Thursday (4/23) 11:30, 3:30 • Friday (4/25) 3:00 — 5:00 • Monday (4/27) 10:30 — 3:00 • Tuesday (4/28) 1:00 — 4:00 • Wednesday (4/29) 1:00 — 5:00 • Thursday (4/30) 9:00—12:00; 2:00 — 4:00 • Friday (5/1) 1:00 Thank you. Dianna Quintanilla Legal Assistant The Northern Trust Building 4001 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 300 Naples, Florida 34103 P:239.435.35351 F:239.435.1218 dquintanilla@cyklawfirm.com CYK coot ,. r . KC)ESTE* 4 FilsonSue Subject: Pelican Bay Property Owners Assoc re One Naples/Mark English, Hank Rossi, & Nancy Lewis Location: https:Hus02web.zoom.us/j/88318429450? pwd=OVgrejdWZ2pDcE1 RMG5LbONJM3hpUT09 Start: Thu 12/10/2020 3:00 PM End: Thu 12/10/2020 4:00 PM Recurrence: (none) Understood. Attendees will be: Mark English — Mee3eaa@aol.com Hank Rossi — hankrossi1940@outlook.com Nancy Lewis - pbpoa@pbpropertyowners.org Sue Filson is inviting you to a scheduled Zoom meeting. Join Zoom Meeting https://us02web.zoom.us/m/88318429450?pwd=OVgre*dWZ2pDcElRMG5LbONJM3hpUT09 Meeting ID: 883 1842 9450 Passcode: 849822 One tap mobile +16468769923„88318429450#,,,,,,0#„849822# US (New York) +13017158592„88318429450#,,,,,,0#„849822# US (Washington D.C) Dial by your location +1 646 876 9923 US (New York) +1 301 715 8592 US (Washington D.C) +1 312 626 6799 US (Chicago) +1408 638 0968 US (San Jose) +1 669 900 6833 US (San Jose) +1 253 215 8782 US (Tacoma) +1 346 248 7799 US (Houston) 877 853 5257 US Toll -free 888 475 4499 US Toll -free 833 548 0276 US Toll -free 833 548 0282 US Toll -free Meeting ID: 883 1842 9450 Passcode: 849822 Find your local number: https://us02web.zoom.us/u/kdzMVyTGHZ This is confirming the Zoom meeting between Commissioner McDaniel and the Pelican Bay Property Owners for Thursday, December 101" at 3:00 p.m. Can you please forward Zoom invite to me? 5 Thank you, Nancy Lewis for the Pelican Bay Property Owners Association i Nancy Lewis, Operations Manager Pelican Bay Property Owners Association 1110 Pine Ridge Rd. Ste 303 Naples, FL 34108 Email: pbpoa@pbpropertyowners.org Phone:(239) 566-9707 Website: http://pbpoa.org/ FilsonSue Subject: Buzz Victor 303-810-7374 re One Naples Location: BCC Office Start: Thu 3/5/2020 2:00 PM End: Thu 3/5/2020 2:30 PM Recurrence: (none) Organizer: McDanielBill FilsonSue Subject: BCC Meeting - One Naples Location: BCC Chambers Start: Mon 3/1/2021 9:00 AM End: Mon 3/1/2021 5:00 PM Recurrence: (none) Organizer: FilsonSue Good afternoon, At today's Special BCC Meeting, the Board confirmed March 1, with a continuation date of March 2 if necessary, to hold the BCC/One Naples Hearing Item, starting at 9:00. Please schedule your calendar(s), as well as (Aimee) the boardroom schedule. Thank you, MJ Mary -Jo Brock - Executive Assistant to Leo E. Ochs, Jr. maryio.brock0col liercountyfl.gov County Manager's Office 3299 East Tamiami Trail Naples FL 34112 239.252.8364 8 From:Cisco Advanced Phishing Protection To:McDanielBill Subject:[Untrusted Message] In support of One Naples project Date:Friday, February 26, 2021 2:15:13 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. WARNING: The system has detected an untrusted message: From: "rawportraits@gmail.com" Subject: "In support of One Naples project" Please proceed with caution! From:mcdanielbill1@gmail.com To:McDanielBill Subject:[WARNING Possible Forged Email Attempt] Re: FW: One Naples hearing Date:Monday, February 1, 2021 9:21:49 PM Attachments:Outlook-1475677247.png Outlook-1475677247.png EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. That's correct the does not appear to a viable alternative On Mon, Feb 1, 2021, 4:13 PM McDanielBill <Bill.McDaniel@colliercountyfl.gov> wrote: From: Layden, Laura <Laura.Layden@naplesnews.com> Sent: Monday, February 1, 2021 4:06 PM To: LoCastroRick <Rick.LoCastro@colliercountyfl.gov>; McDanielBill <Bill.McDaniel@colliercountyfl.gov>; TaylorPenny <Penny.Taylor@colliercountyfl.gov>; SaundersBurt <Burt.Saunders@colliercountyfl.gov>; SolisAndy <Andy.Solis@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: re: One Naples hearing EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Good afternoon. It appears that the One Naples hearing will be held at commission chambers? Is that correct? What are your thoughts about it? It seems from the county manager's report that it will be the best venue, given COVID limitations and event conflicts. Thank you. Laura Layden Senior Business Reporter Mobile: 239.253.8953 Office: 239.263.4818 Laura.Layden@NaplesNews.com NaplesNews.com Support LOCAL JOURNALISM and become an all access-digital subscriber to naplesnews.com with this special offer: naplenews.com/subscribe Sign up for our Breaking Ground newsletter: https://www.naplesnews.com/featured-newsletter/breaking_ground/ Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. From:mcdanielbill1@gmail.com To:McDanielBill Subject:[WARNING Possible Forged Email Attempt] Re: FW: Vanderbilt neighborhood- ONE Naples Request to Change the GMP Date:Wednesday, February 17, 2021 5:25:21 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Tell him to call me please On Wed, Feb 17, 2021, 4:25 PM McDanielBill <Bill.McDaniel@colliercountyfl.gov> wrote: This is from a CCPC member: thought you might like to see it From: Paul R. Shea <info@savevanderbiltbeach.com> Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2021 4:05 PM To: McDanielBill <Bill.McDaniel@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: Vanderbilt neighborhood- ONE Naples Request to Change the GMP EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: I am a member of the County Planning Commission and I sat through the many hours of testimony at our CCPC meetings regarding the ONE Naples request. I am relatively new to the Planning Commission. Prior to being appointed I was part of our majority population that believed the County always approves developer requests to change the Growth Management . This is one of the reasons, I accepted the position. That reputation has to change. We represent the residents not the developers. My mindset is you establish a plan that the residents can rely on and only make changes that benefit the residents of Collier County. I also, go to Vanderbilt beach regularly. To me this is a no brainer to not approve this application. There is no good reason or any resident support to change our current GMP and certainly no benefit other than to the developer. If you support this request to change, you will be continuing to prove to the residents of Collier County that you do not represent the residents but rather the developers which would be a very sad message to send the public. And quite frankly it would make me reconsider if it is worth my time to be a Planning Commissioner. Please do the right thing and vote against the ONE Naples request. __________________________ --------------------- Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. From:mcdanielbill1@gmail.com To:McDanielBill Subject:[WARNING Possible Forged Email Attempt] Re: FW: The Staff One Naples Minimal Recommended Conditions Clawback Date:Thursday, February 25, 2021 6:12:13 PM Attachments:Screen Shot 2021-02-25 at 2.56.04 PM.png Screen Shot 2021-02-25 at 2.56.04 PM.png EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Yes I asked for it On Thu, Feb 25, 2021, 3:37 PM McDanielBill <Bill.McDaniel@colliercountyfl.gov> wrote: Do you want to see these? From: Greg Stuart <greg@stuarturbandesign.com> Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2021 3:03 PM To: TaylorPenny <Penny.Taylor@colliercountyfl.gov>; McDanielBill <Bill.McDaniel@colliercountyfl.gov>; LoCastroRick <Rick.LoCastro@colliercountyfl.gov>; SaundersBurt <Burt.Saunders@colliercountyfl.gov>; SolisAndy <Andy.Solis@colliercountyfl.gov> Cc: JenkinsAnita <Anita.Jenkins@colliercountyfl.gov>; SaboJames <James.Sabo@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: The Staff One Naples Minimal Recommended Conditions Clawback EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Madam Chairwoman, As a follow up to yesterday's email, please refer to Mr. Sabo's transcript from October's hearing. That is what the BOCC should expect from staff, to do what is best for the community. Staff should not mis-interprete the LDC and back off from commitments made to the public in favor of one developer that is complaining that the October staff conditions do not advance his interests. GREGSTUART (c) 239 677 6126 www.Stuarturbandesign.com www.GregStuartFineArt.com Both Greg Stuart and Stuart and Associates Planning and Design Services intend that this message be used exclusively by the addressee(s). This message may contain information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. Unauthorized disclosure or use of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please permanently dispose of the original message and notify Greg Stuart immediately at 239 677 6126. Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. From:Toby Zettler To:TaylorPenny; McDanielBill Subject:"NO" to One Naples Date:Wednesday, February 24, 2021 2:02:18 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Please vote against the “One Naples” residential proposal on Vanderbilt Beach at the corner of Vanderbilt Beach Rd. and Gulf Shore Dr. in North Naples. Stock Development’s “One Naples” proposal for Vanderbilt Beach is not in the best interest of Collier County residents. The “development” would deprive tens of thousands of residents and visitors of sky, water, and sunset views, and the only public green space left. The beneficiaries? A few buyers willing to pay millions for gulf views and Stock Development which stands to gross close to a billion dollars. How can the County Commissioners even consider approving this project? Stock also wants 99 new docks. This is an unthinkable assault on a priceless natural backwater resource enjoyed by the entire Collier County Community, the already overburdened Vanderbilt Lagoon. I believe it is much better to let Stock carry out their “threat” of a commercial development, as permitted by current zoning, if that is the only other choice left to us. The neighborhood could actually benefit from a properly planned small, low rise commercial development; and it would be far preferable to high-rise residential. We also should require that the waterfront along the Vanderbilt Lagoon be open to the public, just as the beach is. Again, as a Collier County taxpayer, I request that you vote against the One Naples proposal at the meeting March 1. It is time for all Collier County citizens to finally take a stand against overdevelopment. The greater good for the greater number is the correct political call here in order to protect us taxpayers from a developer who obviously cares nothing about the neighborhood nor the environment? Respectfully, Toby Zettler 377 Vanderbilt Beach Rd., Unit 201 Naples FL 34108 From:kathy curatolo To:SaundersBurt; SolisAndy; TaylorPenny; McDanielBill; LoCastroRick Subject:"One Naples" Date:Sunday, February 28, 2021 2:05:52 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. February 28, 2021 Honorable Chair Taylor and Commissioners Solis, Saunders, McDaniel and Lo Castro: I am writing to you as a proud 25 - year resident of District 2 Collier County in support of the “One Naples” project which will come before you for a vote. As a resident in this district, I often walk and swim at the Vanderbilt Beach location on the gulf and believe this project reflects the kind of smart, stable growth my family and I wish to see in our community. I do not think anyone in this community would disagree that this corner has been and continues to be somewhat of an eye soar and certainly goes against our collective mission for the beautiful community we all strive to achieve. As if the beauty and scope of this project were not enough, this LOCAL builder has offered to improve the safety of the intersection of Vanderbilt Beach Road and Gulf Shore Drive, provide connected public bicycle paths throughout “One Naples”, create a lush, tropical garden with the installation of mature, native landscaping throughout the project’s corridor and a coffee shop – deli open to the public ALL AT NO EXPENSE TO TAXPAYERS. As if the aforementioned were not enough to support this project, the increase of our residential tax -base, collection of impact fees, hiring of local contractors adding to a positive economic advantage for our own community members as well as substantially lower traffic based on a residential rather than a new commercial project provide a magnitude of added benefits. I am asking you to support “One Naples” based on the facts and benefits to our community. Thank you for your consideration, you leadership and your service to our community and county. Sincerely, Kathleen Curatolo 7649 San Sebastian Way Naples FL 34109 239-357-3257 From:kantor716@comcast.net To:SaundersBurt; SolisAndy; TaylorPenny; McDanielBill; LoCastroRick Subject:"One Naples" Stock Development Project Date:Sunday, February 28, 2021 7:08:08 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioners, I am a longtime owner of property in Naples Park, previously Pelican Bay and 45 year resident of Collier County. I am in support of the “One Naples” project which is soon to come to a vote by you. I often use the amenities in the area, especially Vanderbilt Beach and believe the project will not only update the corner of Vanderbilt Beach and Gulfshore Boulevard esthetically, but provide additional safety for that very crowded area. Collier County prides itself on beautification of our unique county, as it has set the standard for where people want to live and visit. It has been the well-respected developers who have successfully helped build out our community the way we enjoy it today. This corner, as we have seen in “the season” this year (even with covid) illustrates the expanding number of people who want to visit this area and the need for change. My experience with this builder is that they are trustworthy and have provided many beautiful and tasteful projects, a testament to their promise to make many amenity changes at no additional taxpayer costs. Also, this project will increase the values in this area, adding greatly to our residential tax base. I am asking you to support the “One Naples”project based on the above facts and benefits to our community. Thanks for your continued service to Collier County. Respectfully, Jan Kantor 716 108th Avenue North Naples Fl 34108 239 290 3607 Mailing address: 285 Grande Way, #1202 Naples, Florida 34110 From:Carol Dubnicki To:McDanielBill Subject:“Naples One” Project Date:Tuesday, February 16, 2021 2:26:44 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel The purpose of this letter is to inform you of my opposition to the Naples One project. It is very clear to me that this new development in an already overcrowded, heavily-trafficked, and congested area of Vanderbilt Beach Road and Gulf Shore Drive will only exacerbate an already intolerable situation. I anticipate that you will represent the voters regarding this issue — instead of the developers — and vote against this irrational, biased, and ill-conceived project. Thank you. Respectfully, Carol Dubnicki 8473 Bay Colony Dr. Naples, Florida 34108 From:ashapcorab@aol.com To:Andy.Solis@colliercountyfl.org; Rick.LoCastro@colliercountyfl.org; Burt.Sanders@colliercountyfl.gov; TaylorPenny; McDanielBill Cc:cb_watson@yahoo.com Subject:A SIMPLE QUESTION Date:Sunday, February 28, 2021 8:33:10 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Are there existing zoning requirements regarding One Naples? If so, follow them....Roger A Beckermann From:Jeannette Malone To:McDanielBill Subject:Anti One Naples GMP Date:Tuesday, February 23, 2021 6:32:06 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: On March 1 you and your fellow Commissioners will be hearing Stock Development’s application for One Naples. I am writing you today to express my strong opposition to the development as Stock has proposed it. I know full well that this development is not in our District, and that you generally tend to vote with the Commissioner in whose District the project lies. But, in this case I ask you to act independently. Residents of Commissioner Solis’ District have overwhelmingly shown their opposition. I know that you are aware of that as I know that you have received hundreds of emails telling you so. I believe that Commissioner Solis intends to vote in support of the Stock amendment to the Growth Management Plan. His reason for doing so is flawed. He feels that the neighborhood is not capable of understanding the nuances of the matter before you, and that he, alone, know what is good for his District. When he tells people, “Be careful what you wish for.” he is saying that the residents of the affected neighborhood don’t know for what they are asking. I assure you that they do understand the ramifications of asking that Stock respect the existing C-3 zoning. One Naples is not simply a District 2 issue. It’s approval would send a message that for the Commissioners it’s “business as usual,” and the they have little concern for the “Miamification” of Collier County. It would represent the long-held pattern of the Board of County Commissioners supporting developers over neighborhoods. That must stop! I am asking you to vote to deny Stock’s proposed amendment to the Growth Management Plan. I cannot be more direct. You have for too long and for too often voted to allow developers to run slipshod over the wishes of your taxpaying constituents. I will be there on March 1st to hold your feet to the fire. __________________________ --------------------- From:epircio@verizon.net To:TaylorPenny; SolisAndy; LoCastroRick; SaundersBurt; McDanielBill Subject:Barefoot Pelican Vote to approve Date:Sunday, February 14, 2021 4:01:03 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioners: I own a unit in Barefoot Pelican, which is adjacent to the One Naples Properties. Our owners were given the opportunity to vote their opposition/or favor to the One Naples Development. A positive vote of a majority was going to be rewarded with over $570,000.00 of perks to Barefoot Pelican paid for by an affiliate of Stock Development, according to the Board's letter. The vote came in at 32 owners in favor and 28 owners opposed (22 voted no and 6 refused to vote knowing their votes would count as a NO). This vote came in as such even after much solicitation and pressure from other owners as well as the Board. Commissioners, as you can well imagine, the shenanigans that have gone on between Stock Development and a few of the owners have caused a huge rift in our community. We now have people fighting with each other, law suits have been threatened, one owner was grabbed and almost assaulted by another. A couple of owners have told others they are planning on selling their units and buying into the One Naples development with hopes of a favorable deal from Stock Development in repayment for their efforts to swing the votes. One Naples as submitted will forever change Vanderbilt Beach. This will set the precedent for buying small tracts of land and building high-rises. I do not want this, nor does the rest of the Neighborhood. We do not want the Miami look at Vanderbilt Beach with stifling high rises build practically right on the sidewalks, shadows cast over everyone from the towers, and wind rushing down the street bringing sand, debris and trash with it. Our beloved Manatees in the Bay will be forever impacted by One Naples 99 boat docks with a fueling station and marine store. One Naples is a bad, bad idea for Vanderbilt Beach. There is nothing good for the Vanderbilt Beach neighborhood. Tell Brian Stock that we do not want his Legacy Buildings because they will not be good for us. They will not be good for him either because, if he succeeds with this, it will be because his game has been flawed by the lack of principles and ethics that have been employed to garner favor for One Naples at the expense of our neighborhood, at the expense of my neighbors as well as all of us who truly love Vanderbilt Beach. Respectfully submitted Elizabeth (Betty) Pircio 781-690-0486 271 Southbay Dr. Naples, FL epircio@verizon.net From:Kathy Robbins To:LoCastroRick; SolisAndy; Burt.Sanders@colliercountyfl.gov; TaylorPenny; McDanielBill Cc:David N Galloway; Tony Pires Subject:BCC Consideration of the One Naples Project Date:Tuesday, February 23, 2021 3:02:27 PM Attachments:VBRA Letter to the BCC 210222.pdf EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioners, Please refer to the attached letter. The Vanderbilt Beach Residents Association, Inc. is opposed to this project being approved for the reasons outlined in the letter. But the points made by us in reference to our neighborhood apply to all of Collier County and how you, the Board of County Commissioners, deal with the rampant over development in the County. Please vote "No" on all three applications. Thank you for your time spent in considering our position. Kathy Robbins, Treasurer Vanderbilt Beach Residents Association, Inc. (239) 273-7099 From:David Driapsa To:LoCastroRick; SolisAndy; SaundersBurt; TaylorPenny; McDanielBill Subject:Bike lanes Date:Monday, March 1, 2021 4:00:38 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear honorable County Commission: Bike lanes should be on the street, not be on the sidewalks which are for pedestrians and kids on tricycles. David Driapsa agarden@naples.net (239) 591-2321 From: David Driapsa Sent: Monday, March 1, 2021 11:12 AM To: Rick.LoCastro@colliercountyfl.gov ; SolisAndy ; Burt.Saunders@colliercountyfl.gov ; TaylorPenny ; Bill.McDaniel@colliercountyfl.gov Subject: Parking loss? One Naples Dear honorable County Commission: As a resident with interest in my neighborhood, and watching online the One Naples hearing today, it occurs that the proposal eliminates street parking and unofficial parking in common use on the property for decades without providing for replacement of that parking. Neither is the County parking garage adequate, as evidenced in the presentation illustrating cars backed up to enter the garage. In summary, a public parking garage must be included in the proposal. The long winded presentation does not adequately address the community needs of parking. Traffic lights move the public traffic more efficiently through the area but does not replace lost parking. David Driapsa agarden@naples.net (239) 591-2321 From:fredduy@yahoo.com To:SolisAndy Cc:TaylorPenny; LoCastroRick; McDanielBill; SaundersBurt Subject:Collier County development strategy Date:Sunday, February 28, 2021 3:32:07 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner Solis: As a resident, I want to see Collier county grow and prosper. I appreciate the need for additional residents and businesses and tax revenue. But the One Naples project is not an appropriate way to develop our county. I hope, as the representative for our neighborhood (Vanderbilt Beach Road west of 41), you will convince your colleagues on the county commission to vote no on this development that will increase traffic on an already busy two-lane road, and dramatically change the demographics and ambiance of our neighborhood, including our public Vanderbilt Beach. There are better ways to grow and improve Collier County. Thank you for representing us. W. Fred Duy 8325 Excalibur Circle O6 Naples, FL 34108 From:Julie wyman To:SolisAndy; ricklocastro@colliercountyfl.gov; McDanielBill; SaundersBurt; TaylorPenny Subject:Collier County... SAVE VANDERBILT LAGOON to avoid degraded water quality Date:Sunday, February 28, 2021 1:02:05 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. "Vanderbilt Lagoon & Water Turkey Bay 1996-2008 Water Quality Report" prepared for: Estuary Conservation Association and Vanderbilt Beach Property Owners Association prepared by: Kathy Worley (Conservancy) Conclusion (excerpt): Destruction of mangrove shorelines for development has destroyed or impaired natural filtering mechanisms for terrestrial runoff. This holds true for the Vanderbilt Lagoon waterway where increased human usage and loss of habitat could lead to degraded water quality and could create stress or even cause loss of estuarine species. Water quality degradation is among the leading stressors to estuarine and marine systems due to its numerous sources and the persistence existence of pollutants (Boyer, et. al., 2005) 317 Florida manatees have died so far 2/12... many starved to death due to ecological loss of creeping over development .. even here in Collier County if we privatize Vanderbilt Lagoon with a massive private overdevelopment. Keep the area commercial/mix use and open to the public. From:epircio@verizon.net To:LoCastroRick; SaboJames; TaylorPenny; SaundersBurt; McDanielBill; SolisAndy Subject:Current view up Southbay Dr from Barefoot Pelican walkway - picture 1 Date:Tuesday, January 5, 2021 2:26:09 PM Attachments:RE Current view up Southbay Dr from Barefoot Pelican walkway - picture 1.msg EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioners: I own a condo in Barefoot Pelican at 271 Southbay Dr. which abuts the One Naples properties. This is a picture of our current view up Southbay Dr. towards Vanderbilt Beach. We often spend our afternoons sitting, reading and socializing on our walkways. This is picture 1 of 3 that I will be sending you. Respectfully, Elizabeth (Betty) Pircio Barefoot Pelican Condominium 271 Southbay Dr. Naples, FL This is the view we currently epircio@verizon.net -----Original Message----- From: Ralph Cowie <ralphcowie1@gmail.com> To: epircio@verizon.net Sent: Wed, Nov 4, 2020 4:25 pm From:Tom Arnold To:McDanielBill Subject:Deny Naples One Development as proposed Date:Saturday, February 27, 2021 1:52:29 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Mr. McDaniel, My wife and I live in the pelican bay breakwater community that borders Vanderbilt beach rd and north point road. Traffic is already notoriously bad as well as being dangerous for bikers and pedestrians. It would be a travesty for the Naples one development to be approved. Please stand your ground and deny the Naples one tower monstrosity! Development of that property could be done in a way that would compliment the neighborhood, but a combination green space and small scale local retail is the best choice for that land. As residents of Naples for several years, the answer to the development question is obvious, Deny, Deny, Deny!! Thank you, Laura and Tom Arnold 840 Sailaway Lane Pelican Bay. 34108 From:Julie wyman To:SolisAndy; TaylorPenny; McDanielBill; SaundersBurt; ricklocastro@colliercountyfl.gov Subject:Future vision: Vanderbilt Lagoon and Marina Collier County Park Date:Sunday, February 28, 2021 1:59:26 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Interestingly... In 1887 one of the first improvements the founders of Naples made was to build the public Naples Pier ... which stands today as one of the most popular waterfront destinations in Naples. What vision!! On March 1, 2021, You, too, can have a vision for Collier County that could also last a century and decades beyond: Vanderbilt Lagoon presents a unique Waterfront Park and Marina for Collier County .. A new waterfront destination experience for County residents and visitors -- you should not let it slip away... forever behind private walls. Collier County Parks states a priority is to acquire future park assets to ensure that Collier County's legacy of parks and open spaces will continue well into the future. Collier County Vanderbilt Lagoon and Marina Park Thank you, Julie Wyman From:Janet Lieb To:McDanielBill Subject:Fw: Naples One Date:Sunday, February 21, 2021 7:28:58 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Subject: Naples One I am writing to you with great urgency to encourage you to vote against the Stock Company’s planned project on the corner of Vanderbilt Beach Road and Gulf Shore Drive. I feel strongly that this is the wrong project for this location. The planned development violates several current zoning restrictions: Height limit of 50 feet, proposed project is 186 feet Density limit 87 units maximum, proposed project is 172 Set Back should be 50 percent or 93 feet, proposed 31 feet. The fact that Stock development has now offered a significant payment to a neighboring Association for their vote to support this project is morally unjust in my mind. The Stock Corporation has developed many lovely communities in southwest Florida. In the past they have been good corporate citizens and have been generous community partners. However, this project has given them a black eye. They have continued to ignore the comments of the local citizens opposed to this massive development and have only made minor token changes to their plan. I own a condo on Gulf Shore Drive and I am very concerned about the damage this project will do to our very special neighborhood. The Vanderbilt Public Beach at this corner is already very busy with limited parking. The traffic and parking will become a nightmare with the added occupants projected to live in Naples One. The congestion will negatively affect the quality of life and property values of those of us that already live in the area. Please listen to the voters that have, from the beginning, opposed the scope of this project. Please vote against Naples One! Janet Lieb 9653 Gulfshore Drive #503 Naples FL 34108 Sent from Mail for Windows 10 From:Anthony Pires To:McDanielBill Cc:FilsonSue Subject:FW: ONE NAPLES; MPUD DOCUMENTS: IS THERE A PROHIBITION AGAINST BUILDING ONE WIDE TOWER ON TRACT MU TRACT 1? Date:Thursday, February 25, 2021 3:13:44 PM Attachments:DOC060.PDF Importance:High EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Good afternoon Commissioner McDaniel. I hope all is well with you. I just wanted to let you know of my inquiry to staff. Hopefully I will receive an answer before the close of business tomorrow. Tony Pires #06*10;22+4'5,4$%5 Woodward, Pires & Lombardo, P.A. 3200 North Tamiami Trail Suite 200 Naples, Florida 34103 239-649-6555 Phone 239-649-7342 Fax apires@wpl-legal.com Firm Website: www.wpl-legal.com This transmittal and/or attachments may be a confidential attorney-client communication or may otherwise be privileged or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this transmittal in error; any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this transmittal is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmittal and/or attachments in error, please notify us immediately by reply or by telephone (call us at 239-649-6555) and immediately delete this message and all its attachments. From: Anthony Pires Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2021 10:40 AM To: SaboJames <James.Sabo@colliercountyfl.gov> Cc: BellowsRay <Ray.Bellows@colliercountyfl.gov>; JenkinsAnita <Anita.Jenkins@colliercountyfl.gov>; KlatzkowJeff <Jeff.Klatzkow@colliercountyfl.gov>; AshtonHeidi <Heidi.Ashton@colliercountyfl.gov>; OchsLeo <Leo.Ochs@colliercountyfl.gov>; RodriguezDan <Dan.Rodriguez@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: FW: ONE NAPLES; MPUD DOCUMENTS: IS THERE A PROHIBITION AGAINST BUILDING ONE WIDE TOWER ON TRACT MU TRACT 1? Importance: High James, could you address the issue/question outlined below? Also, has this issue been discussed with the applicant or have there been communications on this issue, since the Planning Commission hearings? It is important to know the position of staff today, in advance of Monday’s hearing. Thanks, Tony #06*10;22+4'5,4$%5 Woodward, Pires & Lombardo, P.A. 3200 North Tamiami Trail Suite 200 Naples, Florida 34103 239-649-6555 Phone 239-649-7342 Fax apires@wpl-legal.com Firm Website: www.wpl-legal.com This transmittal and/or attachments may be a confidential attorney-client communication or may otherwise be privileged or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this transmittal in error; any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this transmittal is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmittal and/or attachments in error, please notify us immediately by reply or by telephone (call us at 239-649-6555) and immediately delete this message and all its attachments. From: Anthony Pires Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2021 10:10 AM To: AshtonHeidi <Heidi.Ashton@colliercountyfl.gov>; KlatzkowJeff <Jeff.Klatzkow@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: ONE NAPLES; MPUD DOCUMENTS: IS THERE A PROHIBITION AGAINST BUILDING ONE WIDE TOWER ON TRACT MU TRACT 1? Importance: High Good morning Jeff and Heidi. As you know I represent the Vanderbilt Beach Residents Association, Inc, (VBRA), and as you are also aware, VBRA opposes the approval of the three pending One Naples applications. During the Planning Commission hearing, I raised the issue that the proposed MPUD would allow the construction of one massive tower. Attached are some excerpts from the Planning Commission hearings regarding whether the developer, based upon the proposed MPUD, could build one big, wide building on Tract MU Tract 1. In reviewing the proposed MPUD documents in the agenda packet, including the proposed conceptual Master Concept Plan (Exhibit C-1 ) and Development Standards Table (Exhibit B and its footnotes) I did not see such a prohibition or restriction. While Footnote #4 of Exhibit B states “ “Exhibit C, Sheet 3 of 4 depicts the location of the towers along Vanderbilt Beach Road and Gulf Shore Drive...”, in my review, Exhibit C, Sheet 3 of 4 only details setbacks and does not prohibit the construction of one massive tower on Tract MU Tract 1, nor does it show any footprint that would prohibit one “big, wide building”. Does the MPUD as proposed, prohibit the construction of one “big, wide building” on Tract MU1? Thanks Tony A Terrible Precedent... One Naples From:N Milenkovich To:SolisAndy; TaylorPenny; LoCastroRick; McDanielBill; SaundersBurt Cc:mee3aaa@aol.com Subject:Fw: SAVE ONE NAPLES Date:Tuesday, February 23, 2021 10:21:02 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. I am also forwarding on the message below to the County Commissioners. They also need to know that NOT everyone agrees with the idea that One Naples should be tabled. The Commissioners should know that ordinary people such as myself who have no stake in this development actually DO support One Naples. Thanks for your time everyone. Ned ----- Forwarded Message ----- From: N Milenkovich <nedmilenkovich@yahoo.com> To: Mee3eaa@aol.com <mee3eaa@aol.com> Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2021, 10:06:24 AM EST Subject: Fw: SAVE ONE NAPLES Mark - Nice to meet you. I live in the area and I am watching all of the activity surrounding One Naples. While I am concerned about density, you should know that there are a large number of residents and homeowners who actually DO support the One Naples project and development. I happen to be one of them. I believe in balance when it comes to development and I think unreasonable development is not a good idea. By the same token, I believe that unreasonable voices opposed to One Naples are equally destructive and detrimental to the area. The entire SAVE VANDERBILT BEACH mantra needs to be permanently shelved. Vanderbilt Beach will be fine. In the same way your Pelican Bay community of rich snobs exists, other developments should be allowed to flourish. The idea that development is for a select few to the exclusion of others is downright silly. I have often thought how nice it would be to bulldoze Pelican Bay to the ground and return it to nature for example. However, I know that is about as ridiculous as this notion that somehow One Naples is going to bring calamity upon the area. Rather than take an unreasonable stand and oppose One Naples, why not embrace change and development next time you take that stage to speak your mind? I will be at the next meeting and I will stand in support of developing One Naples. I hope you will join the growing community of residents that are cheering on this project. Ned ----- Forwarded Message ----- From: Beachwalk Resident Association <notifications@frontsteps.com> To: "nedmilenkovich@yahoo.com" <nedmilenkovich@yahoo.com> Sent: Monday, February 22, 2021, 12:47:10 PM EST Subject: SAVE ONE NAPLES Beachwalk Resident Association Bulletin SAVE ONE NAPLES A Subject to Discuss that Affects Everyone MOU building canyon effect If the Collier County Commissioners approve One Naples as proposed, your community orneighborhood may be next. We’ve learned some things throughout the course of trying to prevent this One Naples tragedy. One of the biggest takeaways is that developers know no limits when it comes to getting their way. When Stock Development incentivizes the Barefoot Pelican Condominium Association with nearly $550,000 in cash & services to subscribe to Stock’s position, suddenly there are no boundaries for developers. If there is a resistance problem, they simply throw money at it until it is fixed to their satisfaction. The idea, apparently, is that everyone has a price. And we can expect more of the same with the Vanderbilt Palms Condo Association. One Naples is proposed for 5.4 acres of land in an already congested area at the intersection of two busy streets that cannot be widened. Remember, this is two 14 story towers, 3 five story residential buildings, 10,000 square feet of commercial space, up to 99 boat slips with a ship's store, gas pumps and tanks, rest rooms and parking, all jammed onto 5.4 acres and ... virtually right up against the sidewalks! Oh yes, there are setbacks, but no where near what the codes and covenants require. It’s the “canyon effect” for sure, Miami Part II. If Stock is allowed to do this to the Vanderbilt/Naples Park, Pelican Bay/ Parkshore and Pine Ridge communities, Stock and other self- serving developers can buy their way into your neighborhood, too, and completely compromise your quality of life solely for their benefit. What we can do to stop this: 1. If you have not already done so, please complete this survey (CLICK HERE). SaveVanderbiltBeach will be present this survey to the County Commissioners at the One Naples hearing on March 1, 2021. Your opinion matters! 2. WATCH THIS NEW VIDEO (CLICK ON VIDEO PICTURE BELOW), 'One Naples Must Be Denied' from SaveVanderbiltBeach, to fully understand the impact of this A Terrible Precedent... One Naples From:N Milenkovich To:SolisAndy; TaylorPenny; LoCastroRick; McDanielBill; SaundersBurt Cc:mee3aaa@aol.com Subject:Fw: SAVE ONE NAPLES Date:Tuesday, February 23, 2021 10:21:02 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. I am also forwarding on the message below to the County Commissioners. They also need to know that NOT everyone agrees with the idea that One Naples should be tabled. The Commissioners should know that ordinary people such as myself who have no stake in this development actually DO support One Naples. Thanks for your time everyone. Ned ----- Forwarded Message ----- From: N Milenkovich <nedmilenkovich@yahoo.com> To: Mee3eaa@aol.com <mee3eaa@aol.com> Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2021, 10:06:24 AM EST Subject: Fw: SAVE ONE NAPLES Mark - Nice to meet you. I live in the area and I am watching all of the activity surrounding One Naples. While I am concerned about density, you should know that there are a large number of residents and homeowners who actually DO support the One Naples project and development. I happen to be one of them. I believe in balance when it comes to development and I think unreasonable development is not a good idea. By the same token, I believe that unreasonable voices opposed to One Naples are equally destructive and detrimental to the area. The entire SAVE VANDERBILT BEACH mantra needs to be permanently shelved. Vanderbilt Beach will be fine. In the same way your Pelican Bay community of rich snobs exists, other developments should be allowed to flourish. The idea that development is for a select few to the exclusion of others is downright silly. I have often thought how nice it would be to bulldoze Pelican Bay to the ground and return it to nature for example. However, I know that is about as ridiculous as this notion that somehow One Naples is going to bring calamity upon the area. Rather than take an unreasonable stand and oppose One Naples, why not embrace change and development next time you take that stage to speak your mind? I will be at the next meeting and I will stand in support of developing One Naples. I hope you will join the growing community of residents that are cheering on this project. Ned ----- Forwarded Message ----- From: Beachwalk Resident Association <notifications@frontsteps.com> To: "nedmilenkovich@yahoo.com" <nedmilenkovich@yahoo.com> Sent: Monday, February 22, 2021, 12:47:10 PM EST Subject: SAVE ONE NAPLES Beachwalk Resident Association Bulletin SAVE ONE NAPLES A Subject to Discuss that Affects Everyone MOU building canyon effect If the Collier County Commissioners approve One Naples as proposed, your community orneighborhood may be next. We’ve learned some things throughout the course of trying to prevent this One Naples tragedy. One of the biggest takeaways is that developers know no limits when it comes to getting their way. When Stock Development incentivizes the Barefoot Pelican Condominium Association with nearly $550,000 in cash & services to subscribe to Stock’s position, suddenly there are no boundaries for developers. If there is a resistance problem, they simply throw money at it until it is fixed to their satisfaction. The idea, apparently, is that everyone has a price. And we can expect more of the same with the Vanderbilt Palms Condo Association. One Naples is proposed for 5.4 acres of land in an already congested area at the intersection of two busy streets that cannot be widened. Remember, this is two 14 story towers, 3 five story residential buildings, 10,000 square feet of commercial space, up to 99 boat slips with a ship's store, gas pumps and tanks, rest rooms and parking, all jammed onto 5.4 acres and ... virtually right up against the sidewalks! Oh yes, there are setbacks, but no where near what the codes and covenants require. It’s the “canyon effect” for sure, Miami Part II. If Stock is allowed to do this to the Vanderbilt/Naples Park, Pelican Bay/ Parkshore and Pine Ridge communities, Stock and other self- serving developers can buy their way into your neighborhood, too, and completely compromise your quality of life solely for their benefit. What we can do to stop this: 1. If you have not already done so, please complete this survey (CLICK HERE). SaveVanderbiltBeach will be present this survey to the County Commissioners at the One Naples hearing on March 1, 2021. Your opinion matters! 2. WATCH THIS NEW VIDEO (CLICK ON VIDEO PICTURE BELOW), 'One Naples Must Be Denied' from SaveVanderbiltBeach, to fully understand the impact of this proposed project. 3. Share this video with your friends! (One Naples Must Be Denied) 4. Write, E-mail and Call all of the Commissioners and make your voice heard. All their contact information is below. 5. Follow the One Naples events over the next 2 weeks and participate. The meeting and possibly the vote is 2 weeks from today: March 1, 2021. 6. Write your own letter to the Editor of the Naples Daily News showing your concerns about One Naples. Please pay attention to this. Your neighborhood may be next! Let’s get it stopped right here and right now. Thank you for helping to preserve this wonderful place, Naples, Florida, and for working to preserve it for future generations. Mark E. English, President for your Friends at the Pelican Bay Property Owners Association proposed project. 3. Share this video with your friends! (One Naples Must Be Denied) 4. Write, E-mail and Call all of the Commissioners and make your voice heard. All their contact information is below. 5. Follow the One Naples events over the next 2 weeks and participate. The meeting and possibly the vote is 2 weeks from today: March 1, 2021. 6. Write your own letter to the Editor of the Naples Daily News showing your concerns about One Naples. Please pay attention to this. Your neighborhood may be next! Let’s get it stopped right here and right now. Thank you for helping to preserve this wonderful place, Naples, Florida, and for working to preserve it for future generations. Mark E. English, President for your Friends at the Pelican Bay Property Owners Association ONE NAPLES MUST BE DENIED VIDEO Collier County Commissioners: Andy Solis, Esq. (239) 252-8602 Andy.Solis@colliercountyfl.gov Penny Taylor (239) 252-8604 Penny.Taylor@colliercountyfl.gov Rick LoCastro (239) 252-8601 Rick.LoCastro@colliercountyfl.gov William L. McDaniel, Jr. (239) 252-8605 Bill.McDaniel@colliercountyfl.gov Burt L. Saunders (239) 252-8603 Burt.Saunders@colliercountyfl.gov Make Your Voice Haerd Copyright © 2021 Pelican Bay Property Owners Association, All rights reserved. Want to change how you receive these emails? You can update your preferences or unsubscribe from this list. Sent by Beachwalk Resident Association under the care of Beachwalk Resident Association Powered by FRONTSTEPS.com Manage Email Preferences From:Julie wyman To:SolisAndy; TaylorPenny; McDanielBill; SaundersBurt; ricklocastro@colliercountyfl.gov Subject:Fwd: A beautiful day at Vanderbilt Lagoon Date:Thursday, February 25, 2021 3:19:59 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Good afternoon Collier County Commissioners, I took a drive to see the Vanderbilt Lagoon -- what a perfect spot for a Collier County Park and Marina. Thank you for offering to answer any questions -- I do have a couple relating to the pictures below: the breeze off the Lagoon was delicious-- it was so relaxing to be next to this beautiful Lagoon, a Coastal Treasure that should be a Collier County Park! I saw fish jumping! What I did not see were huge tall condo buildings anywhere on this Lagoon such as Stock wants to build. I saw a parking lot sign for Buzz's Restaurant .. is that owned by the restaurant or did Stock buy it? I saw a Beach Parking sign .. pay at the beach store ... did Stock buy that parking area? I saw a sign for Finch's South Bay Marina .. did Stock buy that Marina? I didn't take a picture because there were cars in the way but I saw a sign for Permit Parking .. is that a Collier County lot and, if so, is that part of the .79 county property Stock needs to build OneNaples? Thank you very much -- your input and time is most appreciated! Julie Wyman From:epircio@verizon.net To:LoCastroRick; TaylorPenny; McDanielBill; SolisAndy; SaundersBurt; SaboJames Subject:Fwd: Barrier is 19 feet long and is 20 feet from man Picture 2 of 3 Date:Tuesday, January 5, 2021 2:59:02 PM Attachments:RE Barrier is 19 feet long and is 20 feet from man Picture 2 of 3.msg EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioners, You might wonder what this photo represents. The One Naples Mid-rise building next to Barefoot Pelican will be 37 feet back from the property line for their side yard setback. However, One Naples front yard setback will only be 10 feet back from their property line and will be 87 feet tall. Barefoot Pelican has a regulatory 28 foot front yard setback and is a regulatory 48 feet tall. What this means, is that residents of Barefoot Pelican will be looking at 19 feet of concrete when they try to look up Southbay Dr. from their walkways. So when we are on the walkways reading and socializing, we sill be in the shadows of One Naples mid-rise and will be unable to even look up the street. This is what happens when developers try to circumvent the Zoning Laws when they come in to an existing neighborhood that has complied with the Zoning. The Zoning Laws should remain the same in these neighborhoods lest developers become unjustly enriched at the expense of the current neighbors of which I am one. Respectfully, Elizabeth (Betty) Pircio 271 Southbay Dr. Naples, FL 781-690-0486 epircio@verizon.net -----Original Message----- From: Ralph Cowie <ralphcowie1@gmail.com> To: epircio@verizon.net Sent: Wed, Nov 4, 2020 4:24 pm From:Sharon Swinton To:McDanielBill Subject:Fwd: Naples One Date:Wednesday, February 17, 2021 2:03:52 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Sent from my iPad Begin forwarded message: From: Sharon Swinton <sharonswinton39@gmail.com> Date: February 17, 2021 at 14:03:13 EST To: rick.locastro@colliercountyfl.gov Subject: Fwd: Naples One Sent from my iPad Begin forwarded message: From: Sharon Swinton <sharonswinton39@gmail.com> Date: February 17, 2021 at 14:02:23 EST To: pennytaylor@colliercountyfl.gov Subject: Fwd: Naples One Sent from my iPad Begin forwarded message: From: Sharon Swinton <sharonswinton39@gmail.com> Date: February 17, 2021 at 13:59:46 EST To: andy.solis@colliercountyfl.gov Subject: Naples One Can you explain why Naples One is even being considered. My understanding is that this project From:epircio@verizon.net To:TaylorPenny; SolisAndy; McDanielBill; SaundersBurt; SaboJames Subject:Fwd: Naples one COmmissioners Two Date:Wednesday, January 6, 2021 3:07:46 PM Attachments:Scan.pdfCOMMISSIONERS TWO.pdf RE Naples one COmmissioners Two.msg EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioners: These next two pages are the most important because they show the inconsistencies and lack of compatibility of the One Naples development to the neighborhood. As said before,the project must be consistent and compatible with the neighborhood in order to receive a Zoning change, otherwise, the County will be enriching the developer at the expense of the neighbors. Diagram 1 - Prepared by Greg Stuart a City Planner retained by the Regatta Condominium Complex on Vanderbilt Beach Road. He has listed what the current C-3 Zoning will allow on the parcels, versus what Stock wants to be allowed. Please keep in mind that Stock Development bought all these parcels knowing that the Zoning would not allow what he wanted to build. He bought the parcels and did not make their purchase contingent on his receiving the approvals necessary. it. We are all business people in some way whether we run the County, our households, or work outside. Well, I am a practicing CPA in Mass. and I don't have to tell you, that it is a poor business practice to purchase something for 25,000,000 and not be sure that what you want to build is going to be allowed! Should Collier County be in the business of a bail out of a bad business decision? I hope not! a. Units allowed are a total of 87 ---------------------------------------------------------units wanted -172 b. Height allowed is 100 feet---------------------------------------------------------------height wanted - 208 feet for towers, 87 for the mid-rises c. Setbacks allowed are 25 feet----------------------------------------------------------setbacks wanted are 15 feet for the towers, and one mid-rise, and 10 feet for the other mid-rises. Diagram 2 Prepared by Greg Stuart shows in green the setbacks on Gulf Shore Dr. As you can see, most of the condos have a setback from the road of at least 25 feet except for the Lighthouse, which is 2 stories and setback 17 feet from the road. The average setbacks on Gulf Shore Drive are 49 feet. The setbacks allow the residents to see down the street from their lanais. It offers landscaping and open space for the enjoyment of their residents. One Naples concrete towers will be set 15 feet from the road and even the parking garage will tower 35+ feet over the people and autos. This will create a cavern effect, create shadows instead of sunshine and will increase the wind velocity for the pedestrians. The impact of these towering structures will effect the neighbors, the pedestrians, and the autos. All to enrich the coffers of Stock Development. To my mind the most important deviation from the Zoning Laws is the Setback requirements. Increasing the setbacks to that which is allowed, (25 feet) will cure many of the other problems. If the setbacks are increased, the density will also increase. One Naples setbacks effect the neighborhood greater than any other deviation, in my opinion. I hope you find this information pertinent. I know it is not easy reading and it has also taken me a long time to gather it in a manner that will make a bit easier to assimilate. By the way, all of the information I am sending you is part of the public record. And, in case Stock objects, it is also being forwarded to James Sabo the Chief Planner for the County on this project as part of the public record. Respectfully submitted Elizabeth (Betty) Pircio Barefoot Pelican Condominium 271 Southbay Dr. Naples, Fl 781-690-0486 epircio@verizon.net -----Original Message----- From: epircio@verizon.net To: epircio@verizon.net Sent: Wed, Dec 30, 2020 4:32 pm Subject: Naples one COmmissioners Two epircio@verizon.net violates current zoning codes, covenants and rules, making it neither compatible nor consistent with the existing neighborhood. Pretend this project is in your backyard with insufficient roads, and then vote NO. REMEMBER YOUR RESPONSIBILITY IS TO THE RESIDENTS OF NAPLES. AVALON RESIDENT Sharon Swinton Sent from my iPad From:JOE WOOD To:McDanielBill Subject:Fwd: Naples One Date:Wednesday, February 24, 2021 10:57:14 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel We urge you to vote against the Naples One project near Vanderbilt Beach Rd and Gulfshore Dr as presently offered. Outsiders coming to our neighborhoods should expect to configure their designs to our regulations regarding set backs, building heights, and all external attributes that would change our Naples and Collier County ambiance. DO NOT GIVE THEM VARIANCES! Please keep the Naples personality intact, we are not desperate for development! Carole & Joe Wood 669 Mainsail Pl Naples, Fl 34110 239-593-5967 From:Pat McCaffery Sr To:McDanielBill Subject:Fwd: One Naples (See Name,Address & cell# ) Date:Friday, February 26, 2021 9:11:32 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Sent from my iPad Begin forwarded message: From: Pat McCaffery Sr <pmmccaff@comcast.net> Date: February 26, 2021 at 9:02:14 AM EST To: Kathy McCaffery <kmccaff@comcast.net> Subject: Re: One Naples One Naples email from Patrick & Kathryn McCaffery sr, 899 Reef Point Circle (Beachwalk) Naples, Florida 34208, Cell#- 856-759-3287. Sent from my iPad On Feb 24, 2021, at 10:47 AM, Kathy McCaffery <kmccaff@comcast.net> wrote: Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: McDanielBill <Bill.McDaniel@colliercountyfl.gov> Date: February 24, 2021 at 10:09:05 AM EST To: Kathy <kmccaff@comcast.net> Subject: RE: One Naples Thank you for your email regarding One Naples. I appreciate you contacting me to provide your input and express your thoughts. I carefully consider all information and comments when items are presented to the Board of County Commissioners. Again, thank you for giving me the opportunity to be of assistance to you. I value and appreciate the support as well as your participation in the government of our community. I am always available should you have any questions or concerns you want to discuss. In the future, so that we can determine the location of all concerned constituents, we are asking that all emails include your address and phone number. Bill W. L. McDaniel, Jr. Commissioner, District 5 3299 Tamiami Trail, East Naples, FL 34112 239-252-8605 WEB PAGE: <image001.png> From: Kathy <kmccaff@comcast.net> Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2021 9:38 AM To: SolisAndy <Andy.Solis@colliercountyfl.gov>; TaylorPenny <Penny.Taylor@colliercountyfl.gov>; McDanielBill <Bill.McDaniel@colliercountyfl.gov>; SaundersBurt <Burt.Saunders@colliercountyfl.gov>; LoCastroRick <Rick.LoCastro@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: One Naples EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Sent from Mail for Windows 10 Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e- mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. View this email in your browser One Naples Has Crossed the Line of Decency... From:rlmoore52@aol.com To:TaylorPenny Cc:rick@ricklocastro.com; McDanielBill; andy.soltis@colliercountyfl.gov; burt.saunder@colliercountyfl.gov; rlmoore52@aol.com; office@mtspropertymaintenance.com; colby@fcl3.com; jordanjf10@aol.com; wolfram111@hotmail.com Subject:Fwd: One Naples has crossed the line... Date:Tuesday, February 9, 2021 11:17:23 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Commissioner Taylor's comment in the Naples Daily New 2/9/21 that the $287,827 to Fish and Wildlife Service from the Eastern Collier Property Owners' Group "likens the arrangement to a bribe" is not much different from the $550,000 from Stock Development to the Barefoot Pelican Condo Association. As I have cited in my previous memos to Collier County Commissioners, Stock Development needs to comply with Collier County Codes without Commissioners granting exemptions on height, density and set backs to which all other Collier Condo Associations must adhere. Respectfully, Robert L. Moore 9375 Gulf Shore Drive #502 Naples, Florida 34108 239-566-1543 -----Original Message----- From: Pelican Bay Property Owners Association <pbpoa@pbpropertyowners.org> To: Robert <rlmoore52@aol.com> Sent: Mon, Feb 8, 2021 8:15 pm Subject: One Naples has crossed the line... Now for the Payoff! Stock Development has now presented the Barefoot Pelican Condominium Association, one of the buildings most affected by One Naples as proposed, with a formal proposal, a ‘Memo of Understanding’ (MOU) in their terminology, that will give the Barefoot Pelican Condo Association nearly $550,000 in cash and services in exchange for their support of the One Naples project. The money being offered is for various projects around the Barefoot Pelican property such a painting and landscaping. Folks, this is not about Brooks Brothers giving you a tie if you purchase a shirt or Nike paying Michael Jordan to endorse Air Jordan's. This "understanding" is for the sole purpose of altering opinions, changing opinions and buying opinions. The trade off, of course, is that the Barefoot Pelican Condominium Association agrees to support Stock Development's actions in securing County approval to proceed with One Naples as proposed. In the Naples Daily News article, 'One Naples isn't just controversial, it's become divisive' (January 21, 2021), Collier County Commissioner, Andy Solis, stated that there is nothing "nefarious" about it and that he would be surprised if some inducement wasn't offered to gain favor. When accused of buying votes, Brian Stock of Stock Development in that article said, "I take offense to that." Mr. Stock also said he did not initiate the negotiations with the two condo boards involved and said that they approached him first. Please explain, Mr. Stock, what possible difference this makes. Reality is, Mr. Stock responded to these condo associations' expressed concerns, not out of the goodness of his heart or to be neighborly, he responded to them because he (fully) knew the extent of the negative impact his proposed One Naples development had on these neighboring buildings. He was trying to do 'damage control!' When a developer pays people to ‘buy’ into a plan or project, many consider such action to be underhanded and reprehensible. Thousand of Collier residents see this proposed project as an insidious monstrosity that violates current zoning codes, covenants and rules, making it neither compatible nor consistent with the existing neighborhood. More so, many view this Growth Management Plan Amendment (GMPA) as the developer's self-seeking attempt to profit from a 'bad' business deal at the expense of the neighborhood and community. If our County Commissioners continue to do 'business as usual' and turn a blind eye to this overreaching amendment request, thousands of lives for a hundred years or more will be negatively affected by this project and the 'domino effect' of its precedent! The developer's latest antics of trying to 'divide and conquer' these neighboring associations only serves to prove how flawed and undesirable this project is to the surrounding neighborhood and the Collier County beach community as well! Mr. Stock, would you try to build this project in your Naples neighborhood on 5.42 acres? We must continue to make our voices heard right up until the Board of County Commissioners meeting on March 1st, 2021. What matters is what's right. And One Naples is wrong! We must have two Commissioner's votes to DENY One Naples! We need your help... Please take a few moments to complete this brief Growth Management Survey. This polling survey, being done with SaveVanderbiltBeach, will be used to let our Commissioners know what is important to you. This information will be shared with the Board of County Commissioners at the One Naples hearing on March 1st, 2021. your opinion matters! Also, please continue to write, call and email the five County Commissioners and make your voice heard. Their contact information is below. Mark E. English, President along with your friends at the Pelican Bay Property Owners Association P.S. You'll be hearing and 'seeing' more about One Naples in the coming weeks. We are grateful for your continued support in helping us to contain overreaching urban sprawl! Collier County Commissioners: Andy Solis, Esq. (239) 252-8602 Andy.Solis@colliercountyfl.gov Penny Taylor (239) 252-8604 Penny.Taylor@colliercountyfl.gov Rick LoCastro BRIEF GROWTH MANAGEMENT SURVEY LINK - CLICK HERE (239) 252-8601 Rick.LoCastro@colliercountyfl.gov William L. McDaniel, Jr. (239) 252-8605 Bill.McDaniel@colliercountyfl.gov Burt L. Saunders (239) 252-8603 Burt.Saunders@colliercountyfl.gov Copyright © 2021 Pelican Bay Property Owners Association, All rights reserved. You are receiving this email because you signed up at our website. Our mailing address is: Pelican Bay Property Owners Association 1110 Pine Ridge Rd Ste 303 Naples, Fl 34108 Add us to your address book Want to change how you receive these emails? You can update your preferences or unsubscribe from this list. Join or Renew your 2021 Membership by Credit Card Here Join or Renew your 2021 Membership by Check - Print Form & Mail in From:epircio@verizon.net To:TaylorPenny; SaundersBurt; McDanielBill; SolisAndy; SaboJames Subject:Fwd: One Naples Information-One Date:Sunday, January 3, 2021 6:59:19 PM Attachments:Scan.pdf COMMISSIONERS ONE.pdf EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. January 3, 2021 Dear Commissioners: Thank you for the opportunity to forward information to you regarding the One Naples Submission. This submission has resulted in towers of paperwork and it has taken me some time to sift through it all and cull out the important information for you. Formerly, I was on the Planning Board of my town in Mass which was located 10 miles from Boston at the intersection of 3 major highways. Because the town was so well run, we even had our own electric company, a great school system, etc.; many developers tried to come in and maximize their buildings on scarce parcels of land. So I quickly became used to their efforts to build as big, as high, and as dense as they wanted to maximize their profits. Collier County is becoming similar to my former town, especially near the Gulf. Many want to live in Naples and real estate seemingly can sell itself. But Collier County has to use their discretion in what they allow to come in lest the overgrowth results in an unlivable crowded area of future blight. Collier County has a Master Plan which they call the Growth Management Plan. This Plan sets out all the zoning districts and what is allowed in each one. If a developer wants to build something that is not allowed in a particular zoning district, the County allows the developer to come before them and ask for a change in the Zoning. This is supposed to be an "exception" and not the normal course of events - for otherwise -why have a master plan at all? That is why a "super-majority vote" of the Commissioners is required to change a Zoning District and Amend the Growth Management Plan. There are certain guidelines that the developer must prove his project adheres to. His project must be compatible and consistent with the neighborhood. That means, the project must "fit" into the zoning that is currently in place. That is why you will not get a gas station next to a high rise tower, or an industrial building next to a residential subdivision. The surrounding neighbors who followed the Zoning Laws, cannot suffer because an owner wants to come into the neighborhood and build what he wants, regardless of the Zoning in place or what is already there. This would result in a developer being enriched at the expense of his neighbors, and that would be against the law. It would also be contrary to the Master Plan. This is the argument that is being made against Stock Development. They have bought parcels of land totaling less than 5 acres and want special treatment by the Commissioners to allow them to change the Zoning of these parcels in order to maximize their investment at the expense of the neighbors. The attached pictures illustrate their impact on the neighborhood. 1. Save Vanderbilt Beach (SVB) diagram of the two towers to scale showing the 35+foot parking garage set 15 feet in from their property line. This garage is 700 feet long and will encompass the whole corner. See the scale to the people and the autos. The walls are so tall, the palm trees will not hide it. 2. Scale of the buildings from the parking lot of Daruma Restaurant creating a huge shadow along with winds over the restaurant-again look at scale to people and autos 3. Again from SVB - even the mid rise buildings will dwarf Barefoot Pelican Condominium (where I own a condo). 4. Again from SVB- Because of the lack of setbacks, we at Barefoot Pelican will not be able to see up Southbay Dr. because their mid-rise will have 10 foot setbacks and we complied with Zoning and have a 28 foot setback. Commissioners, this is the first of the packets of information I will be sending you. I am available should you have any questions or comments as we go along in this process. I have been involved in this project since 2017 when it was first proposed. The developer has constantly discounted the concerns of the neighbors which has resulted in a large group of unhappy and angry residents who have become fairly knowledgeable about this. For this reason, I would urge you to again vote to reconsider and change the Hearing venue to one that will allow all the concerned residents the ability to speak, as well as more importantly, the ability to listen to what others, including yourselves, have to say. Respectfully submitted ELizabeth (Betty) Pircio 271 Southbay Drive Barefoot Pelican Condominium Naples, FL 781-690-0486 epircio@verizon.net From:Rae Ann Burton To:McDanielBill; SolisAndy; SaundersBurt; TaylorPenny Subject:Fwd: One Naples is a flawed project Date:Sunday, February 28, 2021 4:59:06 PM Attachments:Project map ONE NAPLES 2021.pdf Importance:High EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioners:, What comes before this board concerns not just those in the project impact area, but all of the Taxpayers of the Collier County. It seems that the Developers wishes and demands are being approved while the Taxpayer - WE the people- who put -you - the commissioners in office, praying that the commissioners' decisions would benefit all concerns - not just the developers. Because of prior plans, I will not be able to come and support the homeowners of Pelican Bay area to protest against this project. But I again wish to voice my concerns about this project. After seeing the actual area and hearing about the loss of beach access and parking, I became even more concerned - attached map of project. I have heard it said that it would be great for the economy - . This Project benefits - only - the development residents and developer - no public parking provided in the project and loss of existing beach front to build 99 boat slips. Not to mention the wall around the complex. What is economy- but money? (definition of economy - a system of making and trading things of value. It is usually divided into good (physical things) and services (thing done by people). It assumes there is medium of exchange, which is a system of Finance, making trade possible.) What about being good for the quality of life? (definition of quality of life - the degree to which an individual is healthy, comfortable and able to participate in or enjoy Live events - a multidimensional, encompassing emotional, physical material of social well-being.) What happens to the quality of life for the residents of Pelican Bay and Collier County Taxpayers that are losing the benefit of beach access and parking and will have to pay for the infrastructure and services that the developer does not pay? Where is their quality of Life? This will impact the traffic flow- already congested -had to circle at noon 2 x's to find a spot to park and it was not close to the beach. Bicycles are ridden a lot in that area, the streets are already very narrow for 2 way traffic let alone bikes and people. This Project is not according to the preset codes and zoning laws. Which it seems that the developers tend to ignore to build their massive projects. This will destroy what little there is left of Vanderbilt beach uniqueness. Please consider the existing residents, the year round residents and Collier County Taxpayers what they will lose with this project. Will it be filled with part-timers and renters or full time residents? Concerned Taxpayer Rural Golden Gate Estates Rae Ann Burton From:Susan H To:LoCastroRick; SolisAndy; SaundersBurt; TaylorPenny; McDanielBill Cc:CapizziAixa; GoodnerAngela; LykinsDave; GrecoSherry; FilsonSue Subject:Fwd: One Naples Project Date:Thursday, February 18, 2021 10:48:43 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. To the Board of County Commissioners, I want to thank you for your time and consideration of my concerns. I have tried to contact Commissioner Solis several times regarding my concerns without response, so I have decided to go ahead and re-send my last email to my commissioner to you all. I extend my invitation to any/all of you to come on a walk in our neighborhood to understand better how the safety of my friends and neighbors would be negatively affected by the One Naples project. Thank you all for your work as our representatives. Cheers, Susan Housel ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Susan H <slhousel@gmail.com> Date: Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 6:41 PM Subject: One Naples Project To: Andy.Solis@CollierCountyFL.Gov <Andy.Solis@colliercountyfl.gov> Hi, Andy - Thank you for having the Coffee time this evening, it was good to hear some updates on Covid, projects, mental health, and the new sports park. My question was not addressed during the meeting, and I, along with many of my friends/neighbors in Naples Park, am very concerned about the One Naples project. Our neighborhood does not have sidewalks, nor do our streets have shoulders, and we are a very active walking neighborhood. I am concerned about the impact to our neighborhood should the One Naples project move forward. I would be happy to walk you around our neighborhood (masked, of course) to show you the concerns we have. We do not have sidewalks on east/west streets, we do not have crosswalks to cross Vanderbilt Drive and there is a lot of traffic along Vanderbilt Drive (especially during traditional rush hour) and people drive very quickly (we have 25 mph posted throughout our neighborhood). I look forward to your response and I hope you would be willing to come see why we are concerned. Thanks! Susan -- "Civil Rights and Voting Have Always Gone Hand in Hand" Susan Housel 513.225.2797 - M -- "Civil Rights and Voting Have Always Gone Hand in Hand" Susan Housel 513.225.2797 - M From:Gerhard Seblatnigg To:TaylorPenny; McDanielBill; SaundersBurt; LoCastroRick Subject:Fwd: One Naples Project Date:Friday, February 19, 2021 3:02:06 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. -----Original Message----- From: JOANNE SEBLATNIGG <ominaples@aol.com> Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: JOANNE SEBLATNIGG <ominaples@aol.com> Date: February 16, 2021 at 5:12:27 PM EST To: Andy.Solis@colliercountyfl.gov Subject: One Naples Project Dear Commissioner Solis I am writing to you to express my feelings regarding the One Naples Project/Development. I have viewed all the photos and have seen all the videos available on the internet, read articles in our newspapers and yet can not find anything positive about the project, including the proposed changes. So far it still remains inappropriate for our neighborhood. The traffic is a major concern as it would be too Intense and far too dense for the proposed area. It will spoil sunsets and water views for existing residents, and it will create more over the speed limit vehicle pass through on Pelican Bay boulevard by non residents which Is already a concern for bikers and pedestrians. In conclusion I along with many others beg you to vote against the project as it exists. I have lived here for over 25 years and the area has already become a concrete eyesore for what was our beautiful Collier County. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Joanne Seblatnigg Sent from my iPhone From:wrolson48@aol.com To:McDanielBill Cc:SaundersBurt Subject:Fwd: One Naples Project Date:Thursday, February 25, 2021 7:54:16 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. -----Original Message----- From: wrolson48@aol.com To: Andy.Solis@colliercountyfl.gov <Andy.Solis@colliercountyfl.gov> Cc: Penny.Taylor@colliercountyfl.gov <Penny.Taylor@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Thu, Feb 25, 2021 6:51 pm Subject: One Naples Project In the interest of our residency as full time home owners in the immediate area of the possible upcoming project, titled Stock Development-One Naples, we are insisting that you vote in opposition to this project. By voting in the affirmative, you are ignoring the existing problems that currently confront the neighborhood surrounding the beach at Vanderbilt Beach Road. On many days all year round, the traffic backs up to Highway 41, also known as Tamiami Trail, and limits the neighborhood traffic from obtaining any easy access to the adjacent grocery stores, library, restaurants, fitness centers, barbers, beauty salons, movie theaters, immediate health care facility, and our homes. Our quality of life will definitely be impacted by this large development known as Stock Development-One Naples. Besides us as neighborhood dwellers, thousands of other Naples residents will also be impacted by curtailed and congested access to the Vanderbilt Beach access point. As a commissioner on the Naples Board, it is your responsibility to act in the best interest of your constituents and vote NO to this upcoming Stock Development-One Naples project. We definitely oppose this One Naples Stock Development and expect your negative vote on this issue, as well. Please act on our behalf and on behalf of the other Naples residents, visitors, and friends who frequent the area in and around this outrageously large Vanderbilt Beach Road project. By opposing the Stock Development-One Naples, you will give us proof that Florida law prohibits unlawful spot zoning, which we believe is identified in this proposed project in our backyard and neighborhood. Thank you for your negative vote on Stock Development-One Naples. Believe that your negative vote on this project is protecting the quality of life for your constituents and the safety of Collier County. Carole and Walter Olson 7686 Pebble Creek Circle #204 Naples, FL 34108 From:epircio@verizon.net To:TaylorPenny; SolisAndy; SaundersBurt; McDanielBill Subject:Fwd: One Naples THREE Date:Monday, January 18, 2021 6:06:55 PM Attachments:Scan.pdf COMMISSIONERS THREE.pdf EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioners: This is another piece of information from the Planning Commission Hearing for One Naples. This attachment is from the transcript of the Planning Commission meeting of October 15, 2020. I can send you the whole transcript if you would like. These 2 pages concern testimony from James Sabo, the Chief Planner and Chairman Fryer. I participated in many meetings with the Planning Staff over One Naples. James Sabo worked with the neighbors as well as others in the Planning Department to try to come up with a solution that would benefit the neighborhood as well as the developer, except the developer would not cooperate. James is stating that the development is too dense and does not meet the Zoning Code by asking for twice the density.He goes on to say that he would agree to a height of 125 feet for the towers if the developer would agree to 25 feet for setbacks. James would also allow just 15 feet for setbacks at the corner of Vanderbilt Beach Road and Gulf Shore Drive if the developer would put in some small commercial stores that would benefit the residents. He was talking about a deli, a small restaurant, retail shops and the like. He was not talking about a bar such as the Beach Box which has created problems. The step back architecture he refers to is like a wedding cake design with tiers that come gradually to a point, not the mass of concrete that they show in their towers. James wants the building masses to fit in with the neighborhood and not overwhelm everything. This dialogue was very important because it showed that the Planning Department was trying to work with the developer in finding a solution. Later James told me that he had sat down with Anita Jenkins, Thaddeus Cohen and other department heads to try to encourage this development to work with and be consistent and compatible with the neighborhood. This idea that he spoke about was the culmination of these discussions. These ideas would be something that Save Vanderbilt Beach would endorse as well. However, the attorney for Stock, Mr Yovanovich took exception to Chairman Fryer and asked him to remove himself from the Hearing which he did. This was done because the Chairman had prepared a diagram of the setbacks on Gulf Shore Drive and had passed them out to the others, thus, according to Mr. Yovanovich, making himself a witness. While this might have made Mr Yovanovich look good to his client, it did not endear him to anyone else. That this bully succeeded was distressful. Without this action, we may have come to a real solution to this problem. Again, thank you for the opportunity to present this information. Respectfully submitted, Elizabeth (Betty) Pircio Barefoot Pelican Condominium 271 Southbay Drive Naples, FL 781-690-0486 epircio@verizon.net -----Original Message----- From: epircio@verizon.net To: epircio@verizon.net Sent: Wed, Dec 30, 2020 5:12 pm Subject: One Naples THREE epircio@verizon.net From:Virgie Lombardo To:McDanielBill Subject:Fwd: One Naples Date:Saturday, February 27, 2021 11:34:23 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Sent from my iPad Begin forwarded message: From: Virgie Lombardo <virgielombardo@gmail.com> Date: February 27, 2021 at 11:26:07 AM EST To: Bill.McDaniel@colliercountyfl.gov Subject: One Naples I oppose of One Naples I live in Pelican Bay, next to Vanderbilt Rd. Virgie Lombardo Sent from my iPad From:Anthony Pires To:McDanielBill Cc:FilsonSue Subject:Fwd: ONE NAPLES; MPUD DOCUMENTS: IS THERE A PROHIBITION AGAINST BUILDING ONE WIDE TOWER ON TRACT MU TRACT 1? Date:Sunday, February 28, 2021 9:19:28 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Commissioner McDaniel, please see clarifying emails, Tony From: Anthony Pires <APires@wpl-legal.com> Sent: Friday, February 26, 2021 3:32 PM To: JenkinsAnita Cc: BellowsRay; KlatzkowJeff; AshtonHeidi; OchsLeo; SaboJames; RodriguezDan; CohenThaddeus Subject: RE: ONE NAPLES; MPUD DOCUMENTS: IS THERE A PROHIBITION AGAINST BUILDING ONE WIDE TOWER ON TRACT MU TRACT 1? Anita, thank you for clarifying that the MPUD as proposed, does not prohibit the construction of one “big, wide building” on Tract MU1. Tony #06*10;22+4'5,4$%5 Woodward, Pires & Lombardo, P.A. 3200 North Tamiami Trail Suite 200 Naples, Florida 34103 239-649-6555 Phone 239-649-7342 Fax apires@wpl-legal.com Firm Website: www.wpl-legal.com This transmittal and/or attachments may be a confidential attorney-client communication or may otherwise be privileged or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this transmittal in error; any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this transmittal is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmittal and/or attachments in error, please notify us immediately by reply or by telephone (call us at 239-649-6555) and immediately delete this message and all its attachments. From: JenkinsAnita <Anita.Jenkins@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Friday, February 26, 2021 3:00 PM To: Anthony Pires <APires@wpl-legal.com> Cc: BellowsRay <Ray.Bellows@colliercountyfl.gov>; KlatzkowJeff <Jeff.Klatzkow@colliercountyfl.gov>; AshtonHeidi <Heidi.Ashton@colliercountyfl.gov>; OchsLeo <Leo.Ochs@colliercountyfl.gov>; SaboJames <James.Sabo@colliercountyfl.gov>; RodriguezDan <Dan.Rodriguez@colliercountyfl.gov>; CohenThaddeus <Thaddeus.Cohen@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: RE: ONE NAPLES; MPUD DOCUMENTS: IS THERE A PROHIBITION AGAINST BUILDING ONE WIDE TOWER ON TRACT MU TRACT 1? Yes. Respectfully, Anita Jenkins, Division Director Planning and Zoning Division 2800 N. Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 Phone: (239) 252-8288 Cell: (239) 478-3701 From: Anthony Pires <APires@wpl-legal.com> Sent: Friday, February 26, 2021 2:57 PM To: JenkinsAnita <Anita.Jenkins@colliercountyfl.gov> Cc: BellowsRay <Ray.Bellows@colliercountyfl.gov>; KlatzkowJeff <Jeff.Klatzkow@colliercountyfl.gov>; AshtonHeidi <Heidi.Ashton@colliercountyfl.gov>; OchsLeo <Leo.Ochs@colliercountyfl.gov>; SaboJames <James.Sabo@colliercountyfl.gov>; RodriguezDan <Dan.Rodriguez@colliercountyfl.gov>; CohenThaddeus <Thaddeus.Cohen@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: RE: ONE NAPLES; MPUD DOCUMENTS: IS THERE A PROHIBITION AGAINST BUILDING ONE WIDE TOWER ON TRACT MU TRACT 1? EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Anita, for clarification, does your “No” mean that the MPUD as proposed, does not prohibit the construction of one “big, wide building” on Tract MU1? Thank you, Tony #06*10;22+4'5,4$%5 Woodward, Pires & Lombardo, P.A. 3200 North Tamiami Trail Suite 200 Naples, Florida 34103 239-649-6555 Phone 239-649-7342 Fax apires@wpl-legal.com Firm Website: www.wpl-legal.com This transmittal and/or attachments may be a confidential attorney-client communication or may otherwise be privileged or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this transmittal in error; any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this transmittal is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmittal and/or attachments in error, please notify us immediately by reply or by telephone (call us at 239-649-6555) and immediately delete this message and all its attachments. From: JenkinsAnita <Anita.Jenkins@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Friday, February 26, 2021 2:55 PM To: Anthony Pires <APires@wpl-legal.com> Cc: BellowsRay <Ray.Bellows@colliercountyfl.gov>; KlatzkowJeff <Jeff.Klatzkow@colliercountyfl.gov>; AshtonHeidi <Heidi.Ashton@colliercountyfl.gov>; OchsLeo <Leo.Ochs@colliercountyfl.gov>; SaboJames <James.Sabo@colliercountyfl.gov>; RodriguezDan <Dan.Rodriguez@colliercountyfl.gov>; CohenThaddeus <Thaddeus.Cohen@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: RE: ONE NAPLES; MPUD DOCUMENTS: IS THERE A PROHIBITION AGAINST BUILDING ONE WIDE TOWER ON TRACT MU TRACT 1? Tony, The answer to your query #2 is no. Respectfully, Anita Jenkins, Division Director Planning and Zoning Division 2800 N. Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 Phone: (239) 252-8288 Cell: (239) 478-3701 From: Anthony Pires <APires@wpl-legal.com> Sent: Friday, February 26, 2021 2:03 PM To: RodriguezDan <Dan.Rodriguez@colliercountyfl.gov>; CohenThaddeus <Thaddeus.Cohen@colliercountyfl.gov>; JenkinsAnita <Anita.Jenkins@colliercountyfl.gov> Cc: BellowsRay <Ray.Bellows@colliercountyfl.gov>; JenkinsAnita <Anita.Jenkins@colliercountyfl.gov>; KlatzkowJeff <Jeff.Klatzkow@colliercountyfl.gov>; AshtonHeidi <Heidi.Ashton@colliercountyfl.gov>; OchsLeo <Leo.Ochs@colliercountyfl.gov>; SaboJames <James.Sabo@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: RE: ONE NAPLES; MPUD DOCUMENTS: IS THERE A PROHIBITION AGAINST BUILDING ONE WIDE TOWER ON TRACT MU TRACT 1? Importance: High EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dan I appreciate your efforts. Yet, as of this moment I have not had any response or reply to my two queries and multiple emails from any other County staff: 1. applicant’s powerpoint. 2. my question as to “one big, wide building”. Tony Pires #06*10;22+4'5,4$%5 Woodward, Pires & Lombardo, P.A. 3200 North Tamiami Trail Suite 200 Naples, Florida 34103 239-649-6555 Phone 239-649-7342 Fax apires@wpl-legal.com Firm Website: www.wpl-legal.com This transmittal and/or attachments may be a confidential attorney-client communication or may otherwise be privileged or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this transmittal in error; any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this transmittal is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmittal and/or attachments in error, please notify us immediately by reply or by telephone (call us at 239-649-6555) and immediately delete this message and all its attachments. From: RodriguezDan <Dan.Rodriguez@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Friday, February 26, 2021 7:47 AM To: CohenThaddeus <Thaddeus.Cohen@colliercountyfl.gov>; JenkinsAnita <Anita.Jenkins@colliercountyfl.gov> Cc: BellowsRay <Ray.Bellows@colliercountyfl.gov>; JenkinsAnita <Anita.Jenkins@colliercountyfl.gov>; KlatzkowJeff <Jeff.Klatzkow@colliercountyfl.gov>; AshtonHeidi <Heidi.Ashton@colliercountyfl.gov>; OchsLeo <Leo.Ochs@colliercountyfl.gov>; Anthony Pires <APires@wpl-legal.com>; SaboJames <James.Sabo@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: RE: ONE NAPLES; MPUD DOCUMENTS: IS THERE A PROHIBITION AGAINST BUILDING ONE WIDE TOWER ON TRACT MU TRACT 1? Importance: High Good morning, Thaddeus and Anita, Please be sure to provide Mr. Pires a response as soon as you have had a chance to review his question. Respectfully, Dan Rodriguez Deputy County Manager Office of the County Manager Dan.Rodriguez@colliercountyfl.gov 3339 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 101, Naples, FL 34112-5749 Phone: 239-252-8383 Cell: 239-253-0866 Fax: 239-252-3991 3 Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail. From: Anthony Pires <APires@wpl-legal.com> Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2021 10:40 AM To: SaboJames <James.Sabo@colliercountyfl.gov> Cc: BellowsRay <Ray.Bellows@colliercountyfl.gov>; JenkinsAnita <Anita.Jenkins@colliercountyfl.gov>; KlatzkowJeff <Jeff.Klatzkow@colliercountyfl.gov>; AshtonHeidi <Heidi.Ashton@colliercountyfl.gov>; OchsLeo <Leo.Ochs@colliercountyfl.gov>; RodriguezDan <Dan.Rodriguez@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: FW: ONE NAPLES; MPUD DOCUMENTS: IS THERE A PROHIBITION AGAINST BUILDING ONE WIDE TOWER ON TRACT MU TRACT 1? Importance: High EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. James, could you address the issue/question outlined below? Also, has this issue been discussed with the applicant or have there been communications on this issue, since the Planning Commission hearings? It is important to know the position of staff today, in advance of Monday’s hearing. Thanks, Tony #06*10;22+4'5,4$%5 Woodward, Pires & Lombardo, P.A. 3200 North Tamiami Trail Suite 200 Naples, Florida 34103 239-649-6555 Phone 239-649-7342 Fax apires@wpl-legal.com Firm Website: www.wpl-legal.com This transmittal and/or attachments may be a confidential attorney-client communication or may otherwise be privileged or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this transmittal in error; any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this transmittal is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmittal and/or attachments in error, please notify us immediately by reply or by telephone (call us at 239-649-6555) and immediately delete this message and all its attachments. From: Anthony Pires Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2021 10:10 AM To: AshtonHeidi <Heidi.Ashton@colliercountyfl.gov>; KlatzkowJeff <Jeff.Klatzkow@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: ONE NAPLES; MPUD DOCUMENTS: IS THERE A PROHIBITION AGAINST BUILDING ONE WIDE TOWER ON TRACT MU TRACT 1? Importance: High Good morning Jeff and Heidi. As you know I represent the Vanderbilt Beach Residents Association, Inc, (VBRA), and as you are also aware, VBRA opposes the approval of the three pending One Naples applications. During the Planning Commission hearing, I raised the issue that the proposed MPUD would allow the construction of one massive tower. Attached are some excerpts from the Planning Commission hearings regarding whether the developer, based upon the proposed MPUD, could build one big, wide building on Tract MU Tract 1. In reviewing the proposed MPUD documents in the agenda packet, including the proposed conceptual Master Concept Plan (Exhibit C-1 ) and Development Standards Table (Exhibit B and its footnotes) I did not see such a prohibition or restriction. While Footnote #4 of Exhibit B states “ “Exhibit C, Sheet 3 of 4 depicts the location of the towers along Vanderbilt Beach Road and Gulf Shore Drive...”, in my review, Exhibit C, Sheet 3 of 4 only details setbacks and does not prohibit the construction of one massive tower on Tract MU Tract 1, nor does it show any footprint that would prohibit one “big, wide building”. Does the MPUD as proposed, prohibit the construction of one “big, wide building” on Tract MU1? Thanks Tony Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. From:Anthony Pires To:McDanielBill Cc:FilsonSue Subject:Fwd: ONE NAPLES; MPUD DOCUMENTS: IS THERE A PROHIBITION AGAINST BUILDING ONE WIDE TOWER ON TRACT MU TRACT 1? Date:Sunday, February 28, 2021 9:19:28 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Commissioner McDaniel, please see clarifying emails, Tony From: Anthony Pires <APires@wpl-legal.com> Sent: Friday, February 26, 2021 3:32 PM To: JenkinsAnita Cc: BellowsRay; KlatzkowJeff; AshtonHeidi; OchsLeo; SaboJames; RodriguezDan; CohenThaddeus Subject: RE: ONE NAPLES; MPUD DOCUMENTS: IS THERE A PROHIBITION AGAINST BUILDING ONE WIDE TOWER ON TRACT MU TRACT 1? Anita, thank you for clarifying that the MPUD as proposed, does not prohibit the construction of one “big, wide building” on Tract MU1. Tony #06*10;22+4'5,4$%5 Woodward, Pires & Lombardo, P.A. 3200 North Tamiami Trail Suite 200 Naples, Florida 34103 239-649-6555 Phone 239-649-7342 Fax apires@wpl-legal.com Firm Website: www.wpl-legal.com This transmittal and/or attachments may be a confidential attorney-client communication or may otherwise be privileged or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this transmittal in error; any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this transmittal is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmittal and/or attachments in error, please notify us immediately by reply or by telephone (call us at 239-649-6555) and immediately delete this message and all its attachments. From: JenkinsAnita <Anita.Jenkins@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Friday, February 26, 2021 3:00 PM To: Anthony Pires <APires@wpl-legal.com> Cc: BellowsRay <Ray.Bellows@colliercountyfl.gov>; KlatzkowJeff <Jeff.Klatzkow@colliercountyfl.gov>; AshtonHeidi <Heidi.Ashton@colliercountyfl.gov>; OchsLeo <Leo.Ochs@colliercountyfl.gov>; SaboJames <James.Sabo@colliercountyfl.gov>; RodriguezDan <Dan.Rodriguez@colliercountyfl.gov>; CohenThaddeus <Thaddeus.Cohen@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: RE: ONE NAPLES; MPUD DOCUMENTS: IS THERE A PROHIBITION AGAINST BUILDING ONE WIDE TOWER ON TRACT MU TRACT 1? Yes. Respectfully, Anita Jenkins, Division Director Planning and Zoning Division 2800 N. Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 Phone: (239) 252-8288 Cell: (239) 478-3701 From: Anthony Pires <APires@wpl-legal.com> Sent: Friday, February 26, 2021 2:57 PM To: JenkinsAnita <Anita.Jenkins@colliercountyfl.gov> Cc: BellowsRay <Ray.Bellows@colliercountyfl.gov>; KlatzkowJeff <Jeff.Klatzkow@colliercountyfl.gov>; AshtonHeidi <Heidi.Ashton@colliercountyfl.gov>; OchsLeo <Leo.Ochs@colliercountyfl.gov>; SaboJames <James.Sabo@colliercountyfl.gov>; RodriguezDan <Dan.Rodriguez@colliercountyfl.gov>; CohenThaddeus <Thaddeus.Cohen@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: RE: ONE NAPLES; MPUD DOCUMENTS: IS THERE A PROHIBITION AGAINST BUILDING ONE WIDE TOWER ON TRACT MU TRACT 1? EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Anita, for clarification, does your “No” mean that the MPUD as proposed, does not prohibit the construction of one “big, wide building” on Tract MU1? Thank you, Tony #06*10;22+4'5,4$%5 Woodward, Pires & Lombardo, P.A. 3200 North Tamiami Trail Suite 200 Naples, Florida 34103 239-649-6555 Phone 239-649-7342 Fax apires@wpl-legal.com Firm Website: www.wpl-legal.com This transmittal and/or attachments may be a confidential attorney-client communication or may otherwise be privileged or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this transmittal in error; any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this transmittal is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmittal and/or attachments in error, please notify us immediately by reply or by telephone (call us at 239-649-6555) and immediately delete this message and all its attachments. From: JenkinsAnita <Anita.Jenkins@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Friday, February 26, 2021 2:55 PM To: Anthony Pires <APires@wpl-legal.com> Cc: BellowsRay <Ray.Bellows@colliercountyfl.gov>; KlatzkowJeff <Jeff.Klatzkow@colliercountyfl.gov>; AshtonHeidi <Heidi.Ashton@colliercountyfl.gov>; OchsLeo <Leo.Ochs@colliercountyfl.gov>; SaboJames <James.Sabo@colliercountyfl.gov>; RodriguezDan <Dan.Rodriguez@colliercountyfl.gov>; CohenThaddeus <Thaddeus.Cohen@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: RE: ONE NAPLES; MPUD DOCUMENTS: IS THERE A PROHIBITION AGAINST BUILDING ONE WIDE TOWER ON TRACT MU TRACT 1? Tony, The answer to your query #2 is no. Respectfully, Anita Jenkins, Division Director Planning and Zoning Division 2800 N. Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104 Phone: (239) 252-8288 Cell: (239) 478-3701 From: Anthony Pires <APires@wpl-legal.com> Sent: Friday, February 26, 2021 2:03 PM To: RodriguezDan <Dan.Rodriguez@colliercountyfl.gov>; CohenThaddeus <Thaddeus.Cohen@colliercountyfl.gov>; JenkinsAnita <Anita.Jenkins@colliercountyfl.gov> Cc: BellowsRay <Ray.Bellows@colliercountyfl.gov>; JenkinsAnita <Anita.Jenkins@colliercountyfl.gov>; KlatzkowJeff <Jeff.Klatzkow@colliercountyfl.gov>; AshtonHeidi <Heidi.Ashton@colliercountyfl.gov>; OchsLeo <Leo.Ochs@colliercountyfl.gov>; SaboJames <James.Sabo@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: RE: ONE NAPLES; MPUD DOCUMENTS: IS THERE A PROHIBITION AGAINST BUILDING ONE WIDE TOWER ON TRACT MU TRACT 1? Importance: High EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dan I appreciate your efforts. Yet, as of this moment I have not had any response or reply to my two queries and multiple emails from any other County staff: 1. applicant’s powerpoint. 2. my question as to “one big, wide building”. Tony Pires #06*10;22+4'5,4$%5 Woodward, Pires & Lombardo, P.A. 3200 North Tamiami Trail Suite 200 Naples, Florida 34103 239-649-6555 Phone 239-649-7342 Fax apires@wpl-legal.com Firm Website: www.wpl-legal.com This transmittal and/or attachments may be a confidential attorney-client communication or may otherwise be privileged or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this transmittal in error; any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this transmittal is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmittal and/or attachments in error, please notify us immediately by reply or by telephone (call us at 239-649-6555) and immediately delete this message and all its attachments. From: RodriguezDan <Dan.Rodriguez@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Friday, February 26, 2021 7:47 AM To: CohenThaddeus <Thaddeus.Cohen@colliercountyfl.gov>; JenkinsAnita <Anita.Jenkins@colliercountyfl.gov> Cc: BellowsRay <Ray.Bellows@colliercountyfl.gov>; JenkinsAnita <Anita.Jenkins@colliercountyfl.gov>; KlatzkowJeff <Jeff.Klatzkow@colliercountyfl.gov>; AshtonHeidi <Heidi.Ashton@colliercountyfl.gov>; OchsLeo <Leo.Ochs@colliercountyfl.gov>; Anthony Pires <APires@wpl-legal.com>; SaboJames <James.Sabo@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: RE: ONE NAPLES; MPUD DOCUMENTS: IS THERE A PROHIBITION AGAINST BUILDING ONE WIDE TOWER ON TRACT MU TRACT 1? Importance: High Good morning, Thaddeus and Anita, Please be sure to provide Mr. Pires a response as soon as you have had a chance to review his question. Respectfully, Dan Rodriguez Deputy County Manager Office of the County Manager Dan.Rodriguez@colliercountyfl.gov 3339 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 101, Naples, FL 34112-5749 Phone: 239-252-8383 Cell: 239-253-0866 Fax: 239-252-3991 3 Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail. From: Anthony Pires <APires@wpl-legal.com> Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2021 10:40 AM To: SaboJames <James.Sabo@colliercountyfl.gov> Cc: BellowsRay <Ray.Bellows@colliercountyfl.gov>; JenkinsAnita <Anita.Jenkins@colliercountyfl.gov>; KlatzkowJeff <Jeff.Klatzkow@colliercountyfl.gov>; AshtonHeidi <Heidi.Ashton@colliercountyfl.gov>; OchsLeo <Leo.Ochs@colliercountyfl.gov>; RodriguezDan <Dan.Rodriguez@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: FW: ONE NAPLES; MPUD DOCUMENTS: IS THERE A PROHIBITION AGAINST BUILDING ONE WIDE TOWER ON TRACT MU TRACT 1? Importance: High EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. James, could you address the issue/question outlined below? Also, has this issue been discussed with the applicant or have there been communications on this issue, since the Planning Commission hearings? It is important to know the position of staff today, in advance of Monday’s hearing. Thanks, Tony #06*10;22+4'5,4$%5 Woodward, Pires & Lombardo, P.A. 3200 North Tamiami Trail Suite 200 Naples, Florida 34103 239-649-6555 Phone 239-649-7342 Fax apires@wpl-legal.com Firm Website: www.wpl-legal.com This transmittal and/or attachments may be a confidential attorney-client communication or may otherwise be privileged or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this transmittal in error; any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this transmittal is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmittal and/or attachments in error, please notify us immediately by reply or by telephone (call us at 239-649-6555) and immediately delete this message and all its attachments. From: Anthony Pires Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2021 10:10 AM To: AshtonHeidi <Heidi.Ashton@colliercountyfl.gov>; KlatzkowJeff <Jeff.Klatzkow@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: ONE NAPLES; MPUD DOCUMENTS: IS THERE A PROHIBITION AGAINST BUILDING ONE WIDE TOWER ON TRACT MU TRACT 1? Importance: High Good morning Jeff and Heidi. As you know I represent the Vanderbilt Beach Residents Association, Inc, (VBRA), and as you are also aware, VBRA opposes the approval of the three pending One Naples applications. During the Planning Commission hearing, I raised the issue that the proposed MPUD would allow the construction of one massive tower. Attached are some excerpts from the Planning Commission hearings regarding whether the developer, based upon the proposed MPUD, could build one big, wide building on Tract MU Tract 1. In reviewing the proposed MPUD documents in the agenda packet, including the proposed conceptual Master Concept Plan (Exhibit C-1 ) and Development Standards Table (Exhibit B and its footnotes) I did not see such a prohibition or restriction. While Footnote #4 of Exhibit B states “ “Exhibit C, Sheet 3 of 4 depicts the location of the towers along Vanderbilt Beach Road and Gulf Shore Drive...”, in my review, Exhibit C, Sheet 3 of 4 only details setbacks and does not prohibit the construction of one massive tower on Tract MU Tract 1, nor does it show any footprint that would prohibit one “big, wide building”. Does the MPUD as proposed, prohibit the construction of one “big, wide building” on Tract MU1? Thanks Tony Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. From:epircio@verizon.net To:SolisAndy; McDanielBill; SaundersBurt Subject:Fwd: Sarasota County Commissioner Nancy Detert tests positive for COVID-19 Date:Tuesday, January 26, 2021 5:49:58 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. FYI Another reason to hold the One Naples Hearing in a larger venue at Artis where the Commissioners will be safer from Covid https://www.heraldtribune.com/story/news/local/sarasota/2021/01/26/sarasota-county-commissioner- nancy-detert-tests-positive-covid-19/4257794001/ Sarasota County Commissioner Nancy Detert tests positive for COVID-19 SARASOTA COUNTY – Sarasota County Commissioner Nancy Detert said Tuesday that she tested positive for the coronavirus earlier this month. Detert, who had missed two public meetings in January, described her symptoms as mild and said she felt compelled to come forward about her diagnosis because she wanted to share her experience. She also wanted to encourage others who may experience similar symptoms to get tested. “It was a rather startling experience for me,” Detert told fellow commissioners. More:How to get a COVID-19 vaccine in Sarasota-Bradenton-Venice-Lakewood Ranch She said she suffered from extreme exhaustion. Detert initially thought she had a cold. She canceled her son’s birthday party and was later encouraged by family to get tested. She quarantined for 14 days after testing positive at the state-supported COVID drive-thru testing facility on the former site of the Sarasota Kennel Club on 5400 Bradenton Road. Detert said she had never been tested before and described her experience as quick and painless. More:Sarasota County gets 7,300 more doses of COVID-19 vaccine, second doses to be scheduled “I am just suggesting that everyone, even if you have mild symptoms, still be tested,” Detert said. “It’s fast and easy and I think you would be very impressed with the great job the county’s doing and all the people who worked up there.” Detert is the third elected official in Sarasota County to announce that they have tested positive for COVID-19. Sarasota City Commissioner Kyle Battie was sworn into office virtually while under quarantine for a positive test. Venice City Council member Halen Moore tested positive earlier this month. Sarasota County Commissioner Christian Ziegler and his wife, Bridget, a School Board member, self-quarantined in June after someone close to them tested positive. On Tuesday, Detert had a message to the public: “Wear your mask, keep social distancing and be grateful we have a vaccine and it will get here eventually,” she said. Detert also pointed to a number of emails from angry residents who expressed frustrations about about the rollout of the vaccine. More:54,725 have received the COVID-19 vaccine in Sarasota-Manatee. Only 812 of them are Black. “Certainly I am the target demographic, but I am in line like everyone else,” said Detert, who turned 76 in October. “Nobody up here is jumping in line.” Three of Sarasota County’s five commissioners are 65 or older — the age group that can currently receive the COVID-19 vaccine in Florida. Commission Chairman Alan Maio stressed that none of those commissioners or their families have gotten the vaccine. “We have been getting some pretty nasty emails saying ‘I’m sure you and your wife have jumped the line,’” Maio said. “It’s just not the case, and it’s just not helpful.” Sincerely, Ralf Brookes Ralf Brookes Attorney www.RalfBrookesAttorney.com Ralf Brookes Attorney 1217 East Cape Coral Parkway #107 Cape Coral Florida 33904 Phone (239) 910-5464 Fax (866) 341-6086 Ralf@RalfBrookesAttorney.com Board Certified in City, County and Local Government Law by The Florida Bar From:Kenneth Flaska To:McDanielBill Subject:Fwd: Srock One Naples Date:Friday, February 26, 2021 10:23:50 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Sent from my iPhone ken flaska 313-598-1122 Begin forwarded message: From: Kenneth Flaska <kenflaska@icloud.com> Date: February 26, 2021 at 10:18:05 AM EST To: Andy.Solis@colliercountyfl.gov Cc: Penny.Taylor@colliercountyfl.gov, rick.locastro@colliercounty.gov, bill.mcdaniel@colliercounty.gov, burt.sanders@colliercountyfl.gov Subject: Srock One Naples Good Day, I am a full time Florida resident living at 271 Southbay next to the development. We applaud Stock’s efforts to develop the surrounding area. They have bent over backwards to accommodate the folks who oppose the development. If you deny the application , we will be stuck with a commercial development on the site which will adversely affect our property values! The opposition consists of mostly elderly snowbirds who are non voters and resist change! Our Association has voted to support the development. Please vote yes!!!!! Sent from my iPhone ken flaska 313-598-1122 From:epircio@verizon.net To:TaylorPenny; McDanielBill; SaundersBurt; SolisAndy; LoCastroRick Subject:Fwd: Stock Deal with Barefoot Pelican Date:Friday, February 5, 2021 8:03:31 PM Attachments:Scan.pdfTHE DEAL WITH STOCK.pdf EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioners: Attached is the "deal" with Barefoot Pelican Condominium and Stock Development illustrating the "incentives" that Stock Dev. is willing to pay to Barefoot Pelican for their endorsement of One Naples. It distresses me to see that it appears that this is how a developer has to do business in Collier County in order to get what he wants. I ask you, if this development was so great for Collier County, would all this be necessary? Would Mr. Stock be willing to pay out this much money if he did not have to do it? Of course not. Why is this happening? Is this business as usual? I hope not! Commissioners, I hope you will do the right thing with One Naples. This kind of behavior should not be condoned. This taints the whole permitting process, the staff as well as the elected officials who allow this behavior to continue and be rewarded. Respectfully Elizabeth Pircio 271 Southbay Dr. Barefoot Pelican Condominium Naples, FL 34108 From:Tracy To:McDanielBill Subject:Fwd: Stock Development One Naples Date:Saturday, January 2, 2021 5:19:16 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Sent from my iPad Begin forwarded message: From: Tracy <tracylogan50@aol.com> Date: January 2, 2021 at 5:16:43 PM EST To: AndySolis@colliercountyfl.gov Subject: Stock Development One Naples I am writing to vehemently express my displeasure of Stock Developments One Naples Project. As a resident of that area, I see daily that the area CANNOT support such a large development. I walk that road 5 times per week. On weekends and during season, traffic is frequently backed up to 41 on Vanderbilt Beach Road. And there are usually multiple cars just sitting in the center lane, waiting for a space to free up in the public parking garage. That should tell you there is not enough parking in that area without Stock development Please, do not approve this project. If you desire this type of development, kindly relocate your family to the concrete jungle of the east coast. This type of development is certainly not in line with our illusion of Naples on the Bay. Tracy Logan Sent from my iPad View this email in your browser SURPRISE, SURPRISE... Stock Development is the Master of Keeping Everyone off Balance! This latest move by Stock Development may not be so bad. They now have the DaRuMa property under contract which will add nearly an acre (.078) in contiguous land to One Naples. This may give Stock the opportunity to adjust setbacks, heights, open space and other essential components to follow the codes, covenants and rules that the Collier County Board of Commissioners, themselves, put in place. Who knows... Stock may reduce heights and make the project conform with the character of the neighborhood rather than an insidious monstrosity that so negatively impacts a way of life for thousands of Collier County citizens. Oh, there is still a battle to be fought. Stock will push it as far as possible to ring their cash register at our expense, but they do own the existing parcels, have an agreement to purchase the DaRuMa parcel and have property rights. Now what do we do? This is an easy one for everybody who cares at all about the future of Collier County. Leave a last minute voicemail message and/or email the Commissioners to strongly urge them 'To Deny" the One Naples GMP amendment. (Below is contact information for our Commissioners.) Tomorrow, Stock will either ask for a 'Continuance' in light of this new information disclosed or choose to proceed. Either way, the first order of business tomorrow, Monday, March 1st., will make that determination. Thank you for staying with us. We are still very much engaged in the fight for an acceptable result. "It's not who's right, it's what's right." From:epircio@verizon.net To:SaundersBurt; McDanielBill Subject:Fwd: Surprise, Surprise! Date:Sunday, February 28, 2021 2:52:00 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Neighbors: We are receiving good media coverage on our battle to get Stock Development to scale down their One Naples. Our survey response is nearing 3000 which was my personal goal and the people overwhelmingly disapprove of the One Naples Development, no matter where they live in Collier County. No one wants this development in their neighborhood nor in any neighborhood. We have solidarity and the Commissioners are listening for once. Please watch the video below and see the extent of the 35 foot tall wall of the parking garage that will be 700 feet long. It is ludicrous that this development has gone this far in the approval process. This type of development needs to feel more push back from the residents. The residents who thought it was ok to accept incentives for their approval need to think again. It is not right. I invite you to stand up with all your Collier County neighbors and do what is best for the whole county. Respectfully Betty Pircio Thank you for all who came out to the Rally yesterday! It was an eye opener and newsworthy! (Click on the photo below to watch the news video!) https://youtu.be/9Ff1xi3JWGQ 'It's so immense': Protesters build wall to protest One Naples project as key vote approaches Laura Layden Naples Daily News Published 4:43 p.m. ET Feb. 27, 2021 - Excerpts from that article "With a make-shift wall, opponents of One Naples attempted to demonstrate one of their biggest fears about the development. On Saturday, some of the most active and vocal residents against the proposed luxury high-rise development assembled and hoisted a wall near its site, one block from Vanderbilt Beach, in North Naples. The objectors designed the wall — made of PVC and canvas — to mimic an L-shaped parking structure that would go near the roadside. In their eyes, it would stand too close to Vanderbilt Beach Road and Gulf Shore Drive, creating an urban canyon for passersby. Raised by a cherry picker, the symbolic wall stood 35 feet tall, the height of the parking podium, including its railing. With it, demonstrators wanted to bring attention to the undesirable big-city-like effects they think One Naples will create in their backyard — and to gain more support for their campaign to stop it. A crucial vote approaches." SVB wall illustration (Buzz Victor explaining the the enormity of the proposed One Naples wall in the Naples Daily News interview.) "While tall, mature and lush landscaping will surround the development, Victor said it won't be enough to completely hide the wall — or make up for its visual and physical impact from the street. "It's like standing next to a telephone pole, in terms of height," he said. "It's just immense." "You're going to be biking or walking down the sidewalk and literally 15 feet to your right or left is going to be this wall, going up to the height of a three-story building," he said. "That's what we're trying to show here." ... "Participants stood near The Beach Store and across the street from it, chanting "Vote down One Naples," and encouraging drivers to honk their horns in support of their effort. The group handed out a one-page information sheet about the project to anyone who would take it and shared their concerns with any passersby who would listen. "The comments were that the demonstration was really powerful and the support has been fabulous, just fabulous," Victor said. More than 100 opponents participated in the rally. That included Ken Melkus, who lives in nearby Bay Colony, who said he thought the 35-foot wall was a good way to show the true impact of the project on the neighborhood. "Nobody has a true appreciation for mammoth this project is going to be," he said. "This is just one component of it." REMINDER! WE NEED YOUR PRESENCE AT THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS MEETING TO MAKE A DIFFERENCE! The hearing begins at 9:00AM, but WE NEED TO BE THERE AT 7:45AM so we can pass out masks and tee-shirts and give the Commissioners a Save Vanderbilt Beach welcomes they arrive and head to their private parking lot. Board of County Commissioners Location: Board of County Commissioners Chambers, Third Floor, Collier County Government Center 3299 Tamiami Trail E. Naples, Florida 34112 Please enter off of Airport Pulling, and park in the public lot. Then walk to where we will be demonstrating for the Commissioners. See the map below. IMPORTANT INFORMATION: If you already have a Save Vanderbilt Beach tee shirt, please wear it. Save Vanderbilt Beach masks will be available, but they are of a quality that you should wear a second mask underneath. If you intend to speak at the hearing, you will be given three minutes and the County Staff tells us that you probably won’t be called until early afternoon. If you are going to speak in person, you may sign up at the hearing. If you wish to speak virtually, YOU MUST REGISTER IN ADVANCE. REGISTER THROUGH THE FOLLOWING LINK: https://us02web.zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_f8KQmTgqQcmhZfx7bP2Jow If you do not have a specific message that is unique, we suggest that you simply: State your name and address and, “I oppose the One Naples application." DO IT NOW! IT'S NOT TOO LATE TO CONTACT THE COMMISSIONERS ... YOUR VOICE STILL MATTERS! Andy Solis, Esq. (239) 252-8602 Andy.Solis@colliercountyfl.gov Penny Taylor (239) 252-8604 Penny.Taylor@colliercountyfl.gov Rick LoCastro (239) 252-8601 Rick.LoCastro@colliercountyfl.gov William L. McDaniel, Jr. (239) 252-8605 Bill.McDaniel@colliercountyfl.gov Burt L. Saunders (239) 252-8603 Burt.Saunders@colliercountyfl.gov Join or Renew your 2021 Membership by Credit Card Here Copyright © 2021 Pelican Bay Property Owners Association, All rights reserved. You are receiving this email because you signed up at our website. Our mailing address is: Pelican Bay Property Owners Association 1110 Pine Ridge Rd Ste 303 Naples, Fl 34108 Add us to your address book Want to change how you receive these emails? You can update your preferences or unsubscribe from this list. Join/Renew 2021 Membership with Check - Print Form to Mail in From:epircio@verizon.net To:McDanielBill Subject:Fwd: Why One Naples is not consistent and compatible Date:Friday, February 26, 2021 4:25:04 PM Attachments:SETBACKS AND FLOORS VB AT GULF SHORE.xlsx EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner: I have attached a diagram that I prepared about the lack of consistency of the One Naples development with the Vanderbilt Beach Neighborhood. Basically, One Naples is pushing over the limit as to what is allowed and what will fit to be complimentary to the neighborhood. These buildings would fit better if they observed the correct setbacks and agreed to at least 25 feet around the whole perimeter of this project. This would naturally reduce the density and be more palatable to the neighborhood because it would not be the massive eyesore that we see in the plans. I have heard that he has a contract to purchase Daruma and I would imagine that some "horse trading" will ensue on Monday. I am thinking that he may be using Daruma to meet some open space requirements, but please do not let this negate the necessity for maintaining sufficient setbacks so that his buildings are not next to the sidewalk. None of us want this over-reaching development, no matter what incentives Brian Stock is willing to pay to get his way. He has to abide by the Zoning Law or he not be the first to flaunt the Zoning with offerings of incentives and then, the whole Zoning will collapse as others rush in and purchase small parcels of land to build towers. As you have assured me, I know you will take into consideration the views of the public in this matter. Warm regards, Elizabeth (Betty) Pircio 271 South Bay Drive Barefoot Pelican Naples, FL 781-690-0486 From:epircio@verizon.net To:McDanielBill; SaundersBurt; SolisAndy; TaylorPenny; LoCastroRick; laura.layden@naplesnews.com Subject:Fwd: Your video Date:Sunday, February 21, 2021 5:12:30 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Attached is a video that I made of One Naples and how I believe that it will be a detriment to my Barefoot Pelican neighborhood. I hate the fact that Brian Stock has gotten so far with this. I hate the fact that he has been able to buy endorsements from some of my neighbors. This is such dirty business. One Naples is simply too massive, too tall, too dense for the neighborhood. It does not have sufficient setbacks, it uses a pool deck and roofs as its Open Space Requirements. It does not fit!! Scale it down and it might fit. Don't jam it down our throats. Our children and their children will be living with this monster. More developers will try the same thing, buy small parcels and magnify their investment as the expense of the neighborhood. That this has gone this far is shameful. https://youtu.be/7EAjDyeFLLE Respectfully submitted Betty Pircio Start Meeting From:Zoom To:FilsonSue Subject:Greg Stuart has joined your meeting - Sarah Spector & other re One Naples Date:Tuesday, January 5, 2021 10:58:12 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Hi Sue Filson, Greg Stuart has joined your meeting: Topic Sarah Spector & other re One Naples Meeting ID 835 3271 2818 Time Jan 5, 2021 11:00 AM Eastern Time (US and Canada) Thank you for choosing Zoom. -The Zoom Team Copyright ©2020 Zoom Video Communications, Inc. All rights reserved. From:J Bicanich To:SolisAndy; SaundersBurt; TaylorPenny; McDanielBill; ricklacastro@colliercountyfl.gov Subject:Growth Plan Amendment Naples One - REJECT IT Date:Monday, February 22, 2021 5:40:38 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioners, Please REJECT the One Naples Growth Plan Amendment. For numerous reasons this project is wrong for Vanderbilt Beach and for Collier County. 1. It is wrong to allow major variances to dozens of regulations in the County Growth Plan, County Zoning Code and Coastal Management Guidelines. 2. It is wrong for the commissioners to give land valued at more than $4,000,000 to the developer. 3. It is wrong for the commissioners to set future precedent by voting to approve a project with so many major variances. 4. It is wrong for the commissioners to ignore the will of their tax-paying constituents. It would be right for the developer to come back with a plan that addresses the concerns listed above. Please REJECT the One Naples Growth Plan Amendment. Jeanie Bicanich, Homeowner District 3 From:Michele Tamarkin To:McDanielBill Subject:Guest opinion: One Naples has "morphed from truly outrageous to simply atrocious" Date:Sunday, February 28, 2021 11:26:54 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Check out this article from Naples Daily News: Guest opinion: One Naples has 'morphed from truly outrageous to simply atrocious' https://www.naplesnews.com/story/opinion/2021/02/25/one-naples-developoment-brian-stock-vanderbilt-beach- buzz-victor/4555268001/ Sent from my iPad From:Kitty C Lynch To:McDanielBill Subject:High Rise Date:Tuesday, February 9, 2021 11:19:49 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Please tell me you will not approve allowing high-rise buildings (example: One Naples) to be built in this area. If such construction starts, say goodbye to farming, wildlife, tranquility and say hello to traffic congestion and blocked sky lines. Or maybe you will reimburse those who moved here years ago for the cost of moving to Tennessee or Alabama. Kitty Lynch 6600 Beach Resort Drive 15 Naples. FL 34114 Sent from my iPad From:Bob Gregory To:SolisAndy; TaylorPenny; LoCastroRick; McDanielBill; SaundersBurt Subject:I oppose the One Naples application Date:Sunday, February 28, 2021 10:54:18 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioners, As you know, One Naples is massive and not consistent or compatible with the neighborhood. There would be negative impacts on Pelican Bay and the surrounding area stemming from further overcrowding of already crowded Vanderbilt Beach; a large increase in Vanderbilt Beach Road traffic that would spill over onto the streets of Pelican Bay; and a dangerous precedent of a massive, high density residential project with small setbacks that could give rise to many more similar developments along Gulf Shore Drive. There is no proposed retail and it appears there is inadequate engineering and environmental studies for the oversized boat and marine facility with storage tanks, gas dock, boat docks and dredging from Federal or State environmental review. This may present significant legal, regulatory and liability risk to Collier County and Commissioners. For all the obvious reasons, the County Commissioners should deny the Growth Management Plan amendment for One Naples. Thank you for your careful review and consideration. Robert Gregory Pelican Bay From:Luis Hernandez Davila To:McDanielBill Subject:In support of One Naples project Date:Friday, February 26, 2021 2:14:44 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel, I am writing to you today in support of the One Naples project and ask you to vote yes on all items that will allow the project to proceed as planned. As a local business owner, I have had the opportunity to work with Stock Development over many years on multiple video projects. I know, firsthand, that Stock Development is an ethical company that truly believes in doing the right thing for the community, while developing quality projects and protecting the unique quality of life we are all so fortunate to enjoy here in Collier County. As someone who raised a family here, I have watched Collier County grow for over 25 years. Just like you, I want what’s best for the community. I want Collier County to continue to grow, ethically and responsibly and I believe that the One Naples project will contribute positively to that growth. I believe the opposition is being deceptive in their presentation of the facts about the project and the renderings they have displayed do not at all reflect Stock’s plans for lush landscaping and well-designed buildings that will blend right in to the area. Contrary to what the opposition has been saying, Stock has directly addressed concerns about traffic and I believe this is the best option to keep traffic to a minimum. In addition, the building heights have been reduced to levels that are lower than some of the neighboring condominiums. The “canyon of buildings” argument simply isn’t valid in my opinion. Finally, as a Hispanic American, I take personal offense to the opposition’s usage of terms like “Miami West” or “Miamification of Naples” in their advertising. In the past, I have heard people use terminology like this to discriminate against people of Hispanic or Jewish descent. Whether that’s their intention or not, it’s simply done in poor taste and does not reflect well on the people of Collier County. In the end, I believe that the One Naples project will create many good-paying jobs and it will be a good source of property tax income for the County. Thank you for your time and consideration. And thank you for your continued efforts to make Collier County a great place to live while protecting our unique quality of life! Sincerely, Lou Hernandez 4629 Lakewood Blvd Naples, FL 34112 From:Julie wyman To:McDanielBill Subject:It takes a County to keep its communities safe from over-development Date:Friday, February 19, 2021 1:26:38 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel, (Yes long, but please read) Brian Stock of Stock Development continues to compare his OneNaples to Pelican Bay -- across the street -- but a world apart. These two developments just are not comparable. Here's why: 1. The Pelican Bay towers, specifically the Ritz, Remington and Trieste, across the street from OneNaples are surrounded by acres and acres of 'green space,' lakes, marshes, flowers and trees. OneNaples towers will be surrounded by concrete and asphalt. 2. All Pelican Bay towers have private beach access. OneNaples towers own no private beach access and the 344 +/- owners/renters together with their many guests will overwhelm Vanderbilt Beach "The People's Beach" 3. OneNaples is a total of 5.4 acres... of course that is only if Collier County 'gifts' Stock with .79 acres of taxpayers' roads. (Land valued at $3.4M) 4. Pelican Bay is a total of 2,100 acres; 530 acres of which are designated 'green space' and 77 acres of which were given to Collier County: 1.69 acres for the Vanderbilt Beach Branch Library; 3.63 acres for the North Collier Fire rescue, Sheriff's Station and Emergency Services; 15 acres to create Pelican Bay Community Public Park with tennis courts, large open field, etc.; 40 acres of Clam Pass Beachfront which is now a Collier County Beach Park; 12 acres for Collier County Utilities AND ... at the end of Vanderbilt Beach Road -- 5 acres of a beautiful stretch of beachfront property which is now the famous "Vanderbilt Beach" which includes land for the parking garage! That's right, Pelican Bay owned this land and it is now "The People's Beach" and one of the most popular beach accesses in Collier County! Recently along a stretch of Vanderbilt Beach Road, Collier County, using tax dollars, extended existing bike lanes further Westward heading to Vanderbilt Beach! 5. Instead of Stock 'gifting' anything to Collier County, Stock wants 'gifts' from Collier County such as: (a) Stock requests a change from Commercial Zoning to Residential Zoning -- this would have a huge negative impact on the quality of life of the neighborhood and of Collier County. When Stock purchased this property he knew it was zoned Commercial. (b) Stock requests a 'gift' from Collier County of .79 acres of taxpayers' roads (approximately $4.3M in land value) so he has one whole piece of property for his two massive 184' skyscrapers. When Stock purchased this property he knew he was purchasing 'pieces' of property divided by County roads. (c) Stock requests 'gifts' of increased building heights, greater density, reduced easements and minimal setbacks so his two 184' towers can be built as close to the intersection of Vanderbilt Beach Road and Gulf Shore Blvd. as he can get so as not to spare any speck of land. BTW the tower directly across the street from OneNaples is 127' high and also in the Vanderbilt Beach neighborhood. 6. The proposed residential OneNaples in the Vanderbilt Beach neighborhood is neither a good 'fit' nor consistent with the Growth Management Plan. The Vanderbilt Beach neighborhood is not comparable to the Pelican Bay neighborhood. The OneNaples property should remain commercial and provide nearby shops, restaurants and services for the neighborhood as well as for the enjoyment of all Collier County residents and visitors .. as it was intended.... that is why it is zoned COMMERCIAL. Nearby residents and hotel guests could walk or bike to the restaurants and shops. It would be another lovely Naples waterfront 'destination' ... with the public Vanderbilt Beach and public access to Vanderbilt Lagoon and a marina -- all in one area. Without excessive pollution runoff of an outrageously massive residential development, a safer environment will be provided for the marine wildlife of Vanderbilt Lagoon. No matter what, Stock should be required to 'gift' Collier County with the water frontage for a ***"Collier County Vanderbilt Lagoon Park." Collier County residents and visitors would have a 'waterfront' access experience at the Vanderbilt Lagoon -- instead of blocking off this "Florida Coastal Treasure" forever for the private use of a privileged few. Children could have all kinds of unique water experiences, water enjoyment, learn boating safety and get up close and learn to respect Florida waters and marine life.... it all awaits at the Vanderbilt Lagoon. Please think about the future of all Collier County and consider carefully the long-term negative ramifications of this massive OneNaples residential project and over-development not just in North Naples, but spewing out into other County districts as well. Please do the right thing for all citizens of Collier County .. VOTE ...NO TO OneNAPLES -- KEEP THE LAND COMMERCIAL Thank you very much, Julie Wyman North Naples ***The Master Plan of the Collier County Parks & Recreation is to provide the County's residents with unique recreation experiences, enhance the quality of our natural environment and attract visitors to the County, thereby contributing to local tourism and economic development. A Mission of Collier County is to optimize its existing parks and recreation assets and set priorities to acquire future park assets to ensure that Collier County's legacy of parks and open spaces will continue well into the future. From:Harriet Young Subject:JUST SAY NO! Date:Friday, February 26, 2021 11:23:14 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner, We have lived in the Trieste in Bay Colony for 14 years. We chose to live in North Naples for the laid back environment with plenty of air space and greenery. Every year, we have experienced more and more traffic build-up on Vanderbilt Beach Road. I would just ask you to drive west from 41 anytime from 4 pm on to see the amount of cars that are using this road. I understand that Stock will ultimately develop Naples One, but the magnitude of this proposed plan is overwhelming to the area — it would inundate us with a density that would make it feel like we were on the East Coast of Florida and cost the serenity of the neighborhood. Please vote NO! Harriet & Donald Young 8787 Bay Colony Drive, Apt. 1905 Naples, FL 34108 609-220-7147 From:Judy Willemain To:SolisAndy; TaylorPenny; McDanielBill; SaundersBurt; LoCastroRick Cc:Brian Maher (bamaher55@gmail.com); Brooke Newell de Gunzburg (brookenewell@gmail.com); Peter Ariens; joanmoosally@gmail.com; Pat Griesdorn (pgriesdorn@gmail.com); Deanna Torres; Mary Danitz Subject:Letter from Trieste Board President - Save Vanderbilt Beach Date:Wednesday, February 24, 2021 11:54:29 AM Attachments:2021 Feb 24 Ltr to Collier County .pdf EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Please find attached a letter from Trieste Association’s Board President regarding “Save Vanderbilt Beach.” Stay safe and healthy! Wishing you a great day and thank you very much for your help it’s greatly appreciated. Thank you, Judy Willemain, CAM Administrative Assistant Trieste at Bay Colony 8787 Bay Colony Drive, #4000 Naples FL. 34108 triesteadmin@guestservices.com 239-597-8787 Fax 239-591-1626 From:Berkey, Kathleen To:LoCastroRick; SolisAndy; SaundersBurt; TaylorPenny; McDanielBill Cc:Tourangeau, Tara; Farmer, Shaiyan Subject:Letter of Support / One Naples (PL20190000696 and PL20190000697) Date:Thursday, February 11, 2021 5:25:34 PM Attachments:image366499.png image144423.png image895678.png image166515.png image904167.png image576059.png image398455.png image783656.png image997689.png Letter of Support re One Naples - Barefoot Pelican.pdf EXTERNAL EMAIL:This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Good evening, Attached please find a Letter of Support from Barefoot Pelican Condominium Association, Inc. for the proposed “One Naples” project scheduled for consideration at the March 1, 2021 Board of County Commissioners hearing. Thank you, Katie Berkey On behalf of Barefoot Pelican Condominium Association, Inc. Kathleen O. Berkey, AICP Shareholder and Certified Land Planner Board Certified Attorney, City, County, and Local Government Law Becker & Poliakoff Six Mile Corporate Park 12140 Carissa Commerce Court Suite 200 Ft. Myers, FL 33966 239.628.4919 239.433.5933 KBerkey@beckerlawyers.com www.beckerlawyers.com Follow Becker on... Confidentiality Note: This message, together with any attachments, may contain privileged and confidential information. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any examination, distribution, or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us by reply e-mail and permanently delete the original message, along with any attachments. Thank you. From:Diana Riley To:SaundersBurt; SolisAndy; TaylorPenny; LoCastroRick; McDanielBill Subject:Letter of Support for the One Naples Project Date:Friday, February 26, 2021 11:48:14 AM Attachments:Stock One Naples Letter.docx EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Good morning, Collier County Commissioners. Attached is my letter of support for the One Naples project. I hope you will share my thoughts at the hearing. Please confirm receipt and if you need any additional information, please let me know. With Warm Regards, Diana L. Riley, Founder 8891 Brighton Lane, Suite 103 Bonita Springs, FL 34135 Cell: 301.706.7131 Email: Diana@swingingwithpurpose.org Website: www.swingingwithpurpose.org Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/swingingwithpurpose Instagram: #swingingwithpurpose From:tarmal@aol.com To:McDanielBill Subject:Letter re: Naples One Date:Tuesday, February 2, 2021 7:46:36 AM Attachments:Commissioners Letter February 2021.docx RE Letter re Naples One.msg EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Please read the attached letter. Thank you. Todd Brodie From:LINDA C SPEVACEK To:SolisAndy; TaylorPenny; LoCastroRick; McDanielBill; SaundersBurt Subject:Local Resident and I Oppose One Naples Date:Thursday, February 25, 2021 11:30:10 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioners, I am writing to very simply let you all know that I oppose the One Naples project as currently proposed. I sat on a planning and zoning board for over a decade in another state, so I understand your difficult task to balance responsible development with local interests. One Naples, however, is not responsible development. The project is vastly over scaled for both the specific site and general location. The concentration of buildings and height of the towers is wrong for the area. You do NOT have to change zoning to fit a developer’s requests, in fact your responsibility is to the existing citizenry and the specifics of the site. I am not opposed to all development on the site, in fact a lower density and mid-rise only development that matches the scale of the surrounding neighborhoods north of Vanderbilt Beach Road, and which contains some restaurants and retail available to the public, would be an appropriate and welcome development for that site. Please vote to deny the application as it stands. Thank you, Linda Spevacek 851 92nd Ave N Naples, FL 34108 From:pointabino@hotmail.com To:McDanielBill Date:Tuesday, February 9, 2021 11:36:31 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. NO more development! Save Vanderbilt Beach! Don’t become like a Florida’s East coast! Sent from my iPhone From:Karen Tarapata To:McDanielBill Date:Monday, February 22, 2021 7:05:29 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Hello, Bill. I am writing to ask you to deny the changes that would allow the One Naples residential project on Vanderbilt Beach Road. You may not live in District 2 as I do, but you may spend time on Vanderbilt Beach or at Delnor-Wiggins State Park. This development will profoundly change the character of a neighborhood that provides TWO public beach access points for Collier County and make it much more difficult for all Collier County residents to enjoy our lovely beaches. The only roads that intersect with Gulfshore Drive along this beach are Bluebill and Vanderbilt Beach Road. These roads are already near capacity and the provisions to mitigate traffic promoted by One Naples are unrealistic. Commercial re-development of this corner is appropriate. It has always been commercial and redevelopment as commercial will benefit the neighborhood and our visitors. The owners in my building are now swayed by the bogey man of commercial development that is presented by Stock development. We feel that commercial development is the better choice for our quality of life. We would not mind more restaurants and shops within walking distance, with adequate onsite parking. Regards, Karen Tarapata President, Board of Directors Vanderbilt Yacht & Racquet Club 11030 Gulfshore Dr. Naples, FL 34108 From:Sharon Swinton To:McDanielBill; SaundersBurt Date:Sunday, February 28, 2021 10:29:51 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Vote NO to Naples One GMP Amendment. Some things are worth more than MONEY! Sent from my iPad From:Kay Woolley To:Betty Pircio; McDanielBill; SaundersBurt; TaylorPenny; LoCastroRick Date:Sunday, February 28, 2021 4:10:15 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. I am writing this to encourage those of you who truly care about Naples, Florida to overwhelmingly vote against Stocks One Naples project. My husband and I have owned at the Barefoot Pelican 30 years. We have enjoyed the comforts and ambiance of the beach community that is just about ready to be destroyed. It is unbelievable to me, as an individual married to a Ph.D. In biology, that anyone could even think about allowing this monstrosity if they are even remotely interested in the environment. I guess tomorrows meeting will tell us who cares and who is only interested in the almighty dollar. Brian Stock, I refuse to call him Mr. since he has no scruples, is interested in the most bang for his buck and he certainly does not care about Naples, the community, or anyone who lives here. I am sorry to see some of you agreeing with this project. I would respectfully ask each of you to be the voice of reason and vote NO on this project as it stands. Respectfully. Kay Woolley From:sandra dorfman To:LoCastroRick; McDanielBill Date:Sunday, February 28, 2021 4:10:01 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Please vote NO on One Naples NMP amendment Thanks SandraDorfman From:sandra dorfman To:SolisAndy; McDanielBill; TaylorPenny Date:Sunday, February 28, 2021 4:07:13 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Please vote NO on One Naples GMP amendment tomorrow From:Jackie Corbett To:McDanielBill Date:Tuesday, February 9, 2021 4:56:07 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Stop stock! From:Joan Verardo To:McDanielBill Subject:Monday"s Naples One Meeting Date:Sunday, February 28, 2021 3:22:09 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel, While I am relieved to hear Stock has purchased additional property in the construction area of One Naples, I remain concerned over the scope and breadth of this project. Therefore, I am asking you, as a representative of Collier County and the people living here who value the natural beauty of the area, to not allow Stock’s current project to move forward. Instead, they need to revise their plans in order to follow the codes, covenants and rules that are already in place. This is the only way the interests of the people will be protected and our rights and expectations as taxpayers respected. Please don’t let us down. There is so much here at stake! Sincerely, Joan Joan Verardo 8410 Excalibur Circle Naples, 34108 From:Ann Darwish To:McDanielBill Subject:My opposition to One Naples: Reasons to reconsider Date:Saturday, February 27, 2021 2:59:24 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. My opposition to One Naples: Reasons to reconsider Naples Roads already resemble parking lots. Please stop. Dear Commissioners, First I want to thank you for your work on behalf of the citizens of Collier County. I want to voice my continued concern regarding the One Naples project. I feel it is not in line with other developments in the area. Pelican Bay development is not comparable to the Vanderbilt Beach community, as the setbacks were designed many years ago and it is one contiguous community as opposed to the beach area, which is a residential street. I do not wish to quash development, but I do want smart growth. One Naples is a bad precedent for our town. It will lead to many other developments of high density being approved, with will permanently alter the character of not just the immediate area around the project, but the whole community over time. I have always said I would never want to leave Naples when I retire, as my husband and I have built our life here in this community. However, I do not wish to live in a recreation of the towns on the east coast. People move to Naples to escape those! Why do we wish to destroy the very thing that makes people choose Naples as their home? It is not just the One Naples project by Stock that I oppose. As a Realtor in the area I have been a big supporter of Stock. For me this is nothing against just them. It is opposition to the continued waivers we hand out to developers - whether it be those building in the town or building in the expanding area out east. We can not continue this pace of growth and maintain the charming charter of our beloved Naples. Traffic gets worse each year, access to the beach by the public is made more difficult, and little by little our quality of life here slips away. I understand the tax revenue, employment, and economic stimulus concerns that are behind our need for growth. These are legitimate. However, I wish to caution against the outcome of continuing to give waivers to developers, be it for density, set backs, building height, or environmental in nature. It is changing our town and not for the better. If we continue to grow without a means to preserve what has made Naples such a special place to live, we will sow the seeds of our downfall. Those who have moved to Naples over the years have come for a reason. We have always been a special community. I oppose One Naples and the continued waivers of well established development guidelines for developers. We are not just "Saving Vanderbilt Beach" we are saving our town. I am including my previous letters that detail my reasons for opposition to One Naples for your review below. I implore you to consider your decision carefully in this matter. Respectfully, Ann Darwish REALTOR®, GRI, RSPS, SFR®, BPOR, ABR® Naples Resident since 2000 (239) 248-4965 anndarwish@me.com ............................................................................................................................................. LETTERS OF OPPOSITION TO ONE NAPLES - REASONS FOR OBJECTIONS: Subject: Opposition to One Naples - “Highest and best use” should not equate to maximum profits and high density Dear Commissioner, I am writing in opposition to One Naples. I believe Collier County is headed in the wrong direction. If we give waiver after waiver to developers, then we really have no standards! I oppose the One Naples development, even with Stock’s latest revisions and wanted to share are my thoughts. I strongly oppose Stock’s One Naples and continued exceptions for developers. Setbacks and other zoning regulations have been relaxed lately and I don’t like the results. This project is another on the list of “letting it slide” and lack of enforcement of current long time zoning regulations. For first time in 20 years of living here I am thinking I may not stay in Naples when I retire. Naples is trending in a BAD direction. I am not alone in that opinion. Just because current zoning allows it does not make it in keeping with what has been built in the area. In my mind, there is a distinction between a project that is allowed and one that would be appropriate. We can make choices that affect population density and the overall feel of our community. “Highest and best use” should not equate to maximum profits and high density for the rest of us who live in Naples. I support growth that is in keeping with our goal as a community. If growth means we become a Mini- Boca, is that what we want to be? If we resign ourselves to MONEY RULES then eventually the even “the rich” end up on the wrong side of the equation! One thing Naples teaches us: no matter how rich you are, there is always someone who has more than you. Commissioner, what happens when it comes to your neighborhood??? As the saying goes “be careful what you wish for.” Again, I strongly oppose One Naples and continued exceptions for developers. I will rely on the words of others who can express the details of the issue better than me. Please consider voting against continued waivers to our building and development codes. Be mindful of the precedent you set and the underlying message it sends to the rest of the community. Respectfully, Ann Darwish REALTOR®, GRI, RSPS, SFR®, BPOR, ABR® Naples resident since 2000 ................................................................................................................................................................. Dear Commissioner, In the coming weeks, you will be given the opportunity to do a great service to the citizens of Collier County in general and to the Pelican Bay, Vanderbilt Beach and Naples Park communities specifically. You will have the opportunity of strongly and in no uncertain terms, recommending to the Board of County Commissioners that they deny the application of Stock Development for the approval of its One Naples project at the corner of Gulfshore Drive and Vanderbilt Beach Road as it is currently proposed. Why should you take this action? I know that the corner of Vanderbilt Beach Road and Gulfshore Drive is currently an eyesore, and I know that it needs to be redeveloped. Stock may be a good choice as the developer, but his current plan is a significant overreach. The current design which includes a 700-foot long 35-foot high wall 15-feet off his property line and a mere 35-feet from edge of the pavement along the length of Gulfshore and VBR, no matter what the planting in front of it, is not in the public interest. It will be a monstrosity for decades to come. And the towers, two 208-foot high structures as close as 25 feet to the property line will dominate the landscape, dwarfing the surrounding buildings. Save Vanderbilt Beach Inc has provided the County Planning Staff with its recommendations as to how One Naples might be redesigned to be neighborhood compatible. These recommendations address building height, density of residential units, setbacks, open space and more. Latitude is provided to Stock, giving the development flexibility vis-à-vis the existing C-3 zoning restrictions. I encourage you to request that the staff provide you with the Cover Letter and the Compatibility Standards document provided by Greg Stuart Associates, Planners to the County planning staff. Can I count on you to recommend denying his current design? Ask him to review the documents referred to above. You need not wait until the formal meeting. A call from you today indicating that you can’t vote for today’s design, but that you would fully support a project more sensitive to neighborhood wishes and compatibility would go a long way to bringing Stock back to the table It’s not too late. Stock is asking the county to donate nearly .8 acres to him in the form of the vacation of various roadways that run throughout his property. What is he giving in return? A project not in the public interest, adding density, traffic, safety concerns, and additional beach usage to an area already overburdened. One more thing. At the Neighborhood Information Meeting and elsewhere, Stock has always stated that if the zoning is not approved, Stock would market the property to a commercial developer who could build a Costco or a gas station there. That’s just not a real possibility. No such business would desire to be at that location. Stock recognizes that as well but thinks that a hotelier might have an interest. Remember, hotels are not approved in the existing C-3 zoning. To protect his investment, however, and to give himself more flexibility, Stock is asking that a hotel use be part of his new zoning. Not only that, but Stock has not qualified that request in any way. There have been no site plans showing a hotel. There are no elevation drawings of a hotel. There is no way to know if the ballroom will hold 200 or 700, or even if there will be one. There is no mention of restaurants serving large Sunday brunches. Nothing. Only that it can have up to 172 rooms. This is not acceptable. Do the right thing, and recommend that the County Commissioners deny the project in its current form. Protect the public interest. Thank you. Ann Darwish ................................................................................................................................................ My Additional Signed Letter and agreement with the opposition letter below. Dear Commssioner, As a Collier County Commissioner, I hope you are listening to the growing level of concern among North Naples residents opposed to the One Naples project, as proposed. What is the value of planning when you can arbitrarily change zoning and request variances that conflict with safety, rights and common sense? The hundreds of walkers from Naples Park, Beachwalk, Pavilion, etc. with chairs on their backs will wonder what happened, when people, not previously zoned, can simply cross the street to take their place at Vanderbilt Beach. One Naples will add more than 500 vehicles that will be forced to use local streets not built for traffic. Vanderbilt Beach Road east of 41 is being widened to six lanes and is being extended further east to the proposed 360,000 vehicle Rural Lands Service Area (RLSA) while west of 41 the two lanes can’t be widened. Please note that Emergency Services must pass through Vanderbilt Beach Road from Hammock Oak Drive. Furthermore, the county has built an expensive four-mile bike path, including bridges, north of Bluebill Avenue to Bonita Springs and you must use Vanderbilt Drive to access. Please consider these facts before deciding. Thank you. Ann Darwish From:balsheet@aol.com To:McDanielBill Subject:Naples 1 Vanderbilt Beach and Golf Shore Date:Thursday, February 25, 2021 11:36:19 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Brother Bill, Please vote against the subject plan. We live in district three, however , your no vote will help all of us. Fraternally yours, Peter Holsten 5336 Hawkesbury Way 908-403-0699 From:jane austermiller To:McDanielBill Subject:Naples 1 Date:Tuesday, February 16, 2021 5:46:28 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Vote no Sent from my iPhone From:M A von Fricken MD To:McDanielBill Subject:Naples 1 Date:Tuesday, February 16, 2021 11:05:08 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel, As residents and registered voters of Collier County, my wife and I are writing to let you know of our opposition to the current plans for Naples 1, as we understand them to be, based on presentations by the Pelican Bay Property Owners Association. I am reluctant to be a NIMBY type of person, but feel that development in SW Florida is in danger of achieving threshold proportions for the very things we don't want to see happen; to turn our beautiful part of the world into the high density canyons of the East Coast. We also understand the more nuanced approach that ought to be taken for this parcel of land and will continue to follow the decisions made by the commissioners regarding planning, zoning changes and the land use propositions for Naples 1. Respectfully, Manfred and Linda von Fricken 5895 Chanteclair Dr 111 Naples, FL 34108 MANFRED A. VON FRICKEN, M.D. rgwmav@aol.com c. 703.929.0089 From:Colleen Hooley To:McDanielBill Subject:Naples one Date:Wednesday, February 10, 2021 8:38:59 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. We are totally against the Naples one project. It will over crowd the beaches snd cause traffic jams and pollution . Colleen Hooley Sent from my iPhone From:Carol Sheehy To:TaylorPenny Cc:McDanielBill Subject:Naples One Date:Wednesday, January 13, 2021 12:44:50 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. I live in Pelican Bay. I enjoy time on Vanderbilt Beach. Please, do not destroy this area by letting Stock overbuild by the beach. Their plans are out of control. VB is already too crowded with cars and pedestrians. The density of buildings/residents they are proposing does not make sense for that amount of land. Please have Stock rethink their offering into a more manageable plan. All of our neighborhoods will be impacted by a terrible build that does not take the overall good of northern Naples into consideration. Carol Sheehy Premier Sotheby's International Realty (239) 340-9300 From:Ken Westlund To:SolisAndy; TaylorPenny; LoCastroRick; McDanielBill; SaundersBurt; west47916@earthlink.net Subject:Naples One Mark English Date:Monday, February 8, 2021 9:37:31 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. I live in a single family home in Pelican Bay. I do not know Mark English nor do I know anyone at Stock Development. It seems Mr. English has something against Stock Development ? Rather than make Pelican Bay a better place to live it appears he is trying to stop a developer from cleaning up the area to the north of the Ritz. Stock Development has other projects in the area that have been a great improvement to Naples. Mr. English does not represent everyone in Pelican Bay. My guess is that he represents only about 15 to 20 % of Pelican Bay. From:Kathy Moody To:McDanielBill Subject:Naples One --- Please keep the C-3 Zoning Date:Saturday, February 27, 2021 9:14:01 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. >> >> Dear Mr. McDaniel, >> >> We want to add our voice to the voices of our Vanderbilt Beach neighbors — Please do not vote to approve the Naples One project. >> >> Stock Development is now running ads that address the current C-3 zoning, by saying “We feel this is incompatible with the neighborhood”. Brian Stock does not have the experience of living in this neighborhood to make the judgement on what is compatible or incompatible for the area. He doesn’t try to walk or ride a bike in the morning on Gulf Shore Drive. He doesn’t try to pull out of his driveway and avoid hitting the walkers and bikers. He doesn’t add ten minutes travel time just to get to and from his home during season because of all the traffic for the beach. Our small neighborhood offers the only public beach access for miles — two major access locations bookend our street. We simply do not have the capacity to absorb any more people living here with the existing infrastructure. >> >> It has become all too common and all too easy for big developers to get variances in Naples. This practice has changed the character in many parts of town. Stock Development bought the parcels with a C-3 zoning, and they should feel free to build anything that meets current zoning. We welcome the next Venetian Village— “Stock Village”. >> >> We look forward to attending the meeting Monday morning, with hopes that the Commissioners will consider how the plus in Stock Development’s financial column will be a minus in the quality of life column for residents of Naples. >> >> Sincerely, >> >> Kathleen & Garry Moody >> 10951 Gulf Shore Drive > From:Colleen Hooley To:McDanielBill Subject:Naples One Date:Saturday, February 20, 2021 7:38:03 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Please vote NO! Colleen Hooley Sent from my iPhone From:Annice Gregerson To:SolisAndy; Taylor Penny; LoCastroRick; McDanielBill; SaundersBurt Subject:Naples One /Vote No Date:Thursday, February 25, 2021 6:34:16 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Collier County Commissioners, Naples One seems to be viewed favorably by some Commissioners, because it will bring in more taxes for Collier County. I am sure it seems an easy decision to vote in favor of this development on that alone. I would ask you to consider if you would like to live there yourselves? Ever tempted if all things were equal? If so, why and if not, why not? I wish I could know what was on your list for "why not" because the same thoughts are going through the minds of others who are opposed to this development. Only, for others, it seems to be an over- riding theme, and that is why the objections are so strong. This development could still be built at an alternate location, still provide tax money for the county and not disrupt the codes that were designed to protect the area. It would be great if one could influence their commissioners to vote out such a development because it does not achieve the most good for all of the Collier County community. If the developer had the interest of the wider community at heart, he would not have tried to squeeze his massive project into this too small parcel. No matter how one tries to make this appear to be right, it is not. You have heard all of the arguments opposed to this development. It is my hope and prayer that you would spare the area from this Stock development at Vanderbilt Beach and vote in opposition to it on March 1, 2021. Steve and Annice Gregerson 5555 Heron Point Drive # 1602 Naples, FL 34108 From:nancydee1@comcast.net To:McDanielBill Cc:"ICE McPeak, Dailey" Subject:Naples One Commissioner William L. McDaniel Jr Date:Tuesday, February 23, 2021 10:51:06 AM Attachments:Naples One Commissioner William L. McDaniel Jr.docx EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. From:David Griffith To:SolisAndy; McDanielBill; SaundersBurt; TaylorPenny; rick.locasro@colliergov.net Subject:Naples One Development Date:Wednesday, February 24, 2021 12:40:11 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Lady and Gentlemen My wife Janet and I live in The Trieste, a condominium located at the northern most edge of Pelican Bay. The rear entrance to the building is right on Vanderbilt Beach Road, less than one quarter mile from Vanderbilt Beach itself. We are registered voters in Collier County. We are deeply worried about the obvious negative consequences of allowing the above project to go forward. Over the years, developers have financially benefited greatly from the growth here in beautiful Southwest Florida. However, to permit a zoning change, as well as allowing this project to go forward will definitely have a hugely negative impact in the immediate area. Right now, the area is extremely busy with vehicular, bicycle, and pedestrian traffic. I can not even imagine what would happen to this neighborhood if this development were permitted. It will create a level of density that will cause problems for years to come. Janet and I are pleading to each of you to do the right thing, and vote not to let Naples One go forward. Your constituents in this area are overwhelmingly opposed. We sincerely hope that the will of the people will prevail in this matter. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, David and Janet Griffith From:TJ McGlinn Jr. To:SolisAndy; TaylorPenny; McDanielBill; SaundersBurt; LoCastroRick Cc:bamaher55@gmail.com Subject:NAPLES ONE DEVELOPMENT Date:Thursday, February 25, 2021 11:51:10 PM Attachments:Naples One letter-MCGLINN TRIESTE.docx ATT00001.htm EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. From:Marsha O To:McDanielBill Subject:Naples One input Date:Monday, February 22, 2021 4:41:05 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel I have lived in Naples Park for 5 years and have actively followed the Stock Development proposal since I attended the Ritz Carlton event in May 2017. Since then I have read the application components submitted to the county, followed comments by county planning staff, read the county planning staff reports, attended the NIM, met with Brian Stock personally as President of Naples Park Area Association three times, and attended all three days of hearings with the Planning Commission. I have learned alot about the development application process as a result of this interaction and my concern for the meaning of the Growth Management Plan continues to escalate. I acknowledge Stock Development altered their original plan but the remaining application remains inappropriate. I strongly object to changing the Growth Management Plan simply to satisfy the desires of one developer when it will have a significant negative impact to the nature of a shared resource in the county in order to reach a certain desired Return on Investment. When Stock bought the property he knew the zoning and its requirements. The property can be nicely developed in many ways, including offering his specialty---high end housing---but at a substantially reduced density., He made clear in our discussions that he could not reduce the density further below the current application. If the ROI is insufficient when accomplished within the current Growth Management Plan and zoning constraints, it is not the problem of the neighbors or the residents of the county to change the Growth Management Plan to meet the ROI needs of the developer. If the Board of Commissioners insists on allowing a change to the Growth Management plan, then it is imperative to follow the guidance of the county planning staff and require the developer to meet all the conditions they set forward in their report so that the impact of the project is somewhat mitigated. If we choose to ignore county planning staff and the clearly stated opinions of a large number of county residents I fear the following: 1) The One Naples towers will quickly become the SHORTEST towers in the neighborhood as current buildings are "refreshed". 2) The One Naples development will stall mid-stream when sales don't develop as planned--- the pool area and workout area seem insufficient to attract high-end buyers who will not be interested in sharing the beach with the current crowds nor deal with the current level of traffic in the area. We will end up with a larger problem at that site than we have now. 3) The Growth Management Plan will be seen as something that is readily gutted and has little meaning. The growth of Collier County will be unbridled and make the county less desirable for current and future residents and businesses. Thank you for reading my input and considering it as you deliberate this question. Sincerely, Marsha D Bale Oenick From:Mary Ann Wallace To:SolisAndy; TaylorPenny; LoCastroRick; McDanielBill; SaundersBurt Subject:Naples One Needs to be Redesigned Date:Sunday, February 21, 2021 3:31:04 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear County Commissioners: One Naples will negatively affect the heavily congested Vanderbilt Beach collector roadway, already having difficulty handling its existing peak hour traffic. Steps from the public beach, it will only serve to exasperate existing road-pedestrian safety issues with overpowering structures, short setbacks, vacation of right of ways, less parking and certainly less compatibility with the immediate surrounding public environment. Stock Development's revised petition with 2 – 16 story towers is still incompatible with the local environment. County staff do not agree that a ‘reduced’ tower height of 208 ft is justified and in keeping with neighboring structures. Please listen to your County staff! Stock fails to acknowledge that they are encroaching on setbacks, sidewalks, right of ways, and don't compare at all to other hotels in the area. Nor are the other hotels so close to the pavement or at the entrance to the public beach! We need you, as our elected Commissioners to be ‘for the people’ and part of the solution. Every decision has consequences that affect the future of Naples for decades to come. Granting deviations will only allow future developers to come along and argue their project is similar to what the Commissioners allowed and everyone can get waivers of right of ways and setbacks. Please! This project doesn't belong right across from our parking garage and scarce access for the residents to the beach! Better plans with less density need to be forthcoming. Thank you for thinking of the residents of Naples, our access to enjoying activities at Vanderbilt Beach, and what is best for Naples. Sincerely, Mary Ann Wallace 445 Robin Hood Circle #102 Naples, FL 34104 From:Jane Garfinkel To:McDanielBill Subject:Naples One Opposition Date:Monday, February 22, 2021 1:46:39 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Rather than subject you to a lengthy email, I just want to reiterate my strong opposition to the Naples One project for all the reasons previously outlined by residents of Pelican Bay. I also want to add that the County Commissioners have an obligation - first and foremost and above all else- to serve and protect the best interests of the county residents. Based on that paramount and overarching duty, the harmful and destructive plans of Stock (or any other developer) cannot as a matter of fact or law outweigh the interests of the residents who oppose the project on valid grounds. I thank you for your continued good judgment in this regard in support of the residents of Collier County. Jane E. Garfinkel From:edythe mccutcheon mccutcheon To:McDanielBill Subject:Naples One Project Date:Tuesday, February 16, 2021 9:50:46 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: I am writing to ask you to enforce the current Collier County zoning and development standards in regard to the proposed Naples One development in the Vanderbilt Beach area. I am asking you to vote against the current proposal as it is not consistent with the surrounding community, will create traffic problems all along Vanderbilt Beach Road and ultimately will have a negative impact on our entire North Naples area. The thought of a 35 foot high wall for hundreds of feet all within 15 feet of the road is appalling. It will look more like a prison than a high end development. And the proposed marina will just add more traffic to an already bad plan. Finally, there is no reason for the County to give away the alley and roadway property that is within the proposed site. I am asking you to send this project back to the drawing board so something more consistent with current standards may be proposed. Sincerely, Edythe McCutcheon Collier County Resident From:Vincent Fantegrossi To:SolisAndy; SolisAndy; TaylorPenny; McDanielBill; SaundersBurt; LoCastroRick Subject:Naples One Project Date:Friday, February 26, 2021 7:14:26 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Good Morning Commissioners, Just a quick note to express my strong opposition to the Naples One project at Vanderbilt Beach. The Save Vanderbilt Beach group has done a wonderful job of expressing all the concerns, so I won’t take time to reiterate them. I will simply say that the area’s current zoning should remain in place. The uses intended when the zoning was laid out, would best benefit the residents of the area. The developer knew the zoning when he purchased the land! One final point ... the gifting of that road would be outrageous! I can’t believe how presumptuous it is of Stock Development to predicate a development based on a $3,000,000 gift from the county. Please reject this project. Thank you for your consideration. Vincent Fantegrossi 254 Lagoon Ave. Naples, FL 34108 Mobile: 617-680-1125 From:McGaunn, Jon To:SolisAndy; SaundersBurt; McDanielBill; rick.loscastro@colliercountyfl.gov; TaylorPenny Subject:Naples One Project Date:Sunday, February 28, 2021 4:05:30 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Chairman Taylor & Commissioners, Good afternoon. I am writing to you today to express my support for the Naples One Development project which is across the street from The Ritz-Carlton, Naples. I have signed up to speak tomorrow, but if for some reason I do not make it I wanted to make sure my comments were acknowledged. As neighbors to this project we see this development as a great enhancement to this site. I have known Brian for over 11 years and know that he does a 1st class job at creating luxury developments. Brian and his team have been very thoughtful in his approach and has done a great job at communicating his plan out to the community on many occasions through public meetings. Most importantly Brian has been intimately involved with the meetings listened and modified his plans based on the feedback he received from the different stake holders. This site has sat empty for years and we are very confident that Brian and his team will do a tremendous job developing it and really enhance the overall area. And I do worry that if this project does not move forward then we could be stuck with something that will not be favorable for the area considering the current zoning allows for intense commercial development. I feel very strongly that the Naples One Project is the best fit for this North Naples community. Regards, Jon McGaunn Hotel Manager The Ritz-Carlton, Naples 239-514-6086 From:Charlene Schuman To:SolisAndy; SaundersBurt; TaylorPenny; LoCastroRick; McDanielBill Subject:Naples One Project Date:Thursday, February 11, 2021 10:09:47 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear County Commissioners, My wife and I have been coming to Naples for over 30 years, and have owned a home here near the entrance of the public beach in Vanderbilt Beach for over 20 years. Gulf Shore Blvd. is unique in that it combines beautiful single family homes with small condominium buildings. It is a two lane thoroughfare with walkers and pedestrians interspersed with slow traveling cars. It truly has a small town feel. Many years ago, it was determined by the zoning board that condominium buildings could no longer be built on Gulf Shore Blvd, and that single family homes were the preferred construction. Stock now wants to entirely change the character of Gulf Shore Blvd. and the type of building to be constructed. He wants to construct two massive towers and other residential buildings that will impede on the setback requirements. Traffic is becoming a greater problem and no matter what Stock's "experts" say, adding a huge amount of additional units and people will adversely affect the neighborhood and cause the area and the beach to be terribly overcrowded We understand that a development on the corner of Vanderbilt Beach Road and Gulf Shore Blvd. is important and we certainly would welcome a tasteful development that will continue the local ambiance of the neighborhood. Stock's proposed development does not do this. It will add massive buildings that will make the street look like Collins Avenue in Miami Beach. Once Stock is allowed its development, other developers will come in and construct additional large buildings and the look of Gulf Shore Blvd. will be lost forever. We ask that you vote against the development and preserve Vanderbilt Beach for people who live there now and for future generations. Thank you. Bob and Charlene Schuman From:nick.ruchty@gmail.com To:McDanielBill Subject:Naples One Stock Development Date:Sunday, February 21, 2021 2:56:53 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. I am President of The St Pierre at Waterpark Place in Pelican Bay Please vote against the One Naples Stock development plan on Vanderbilt Beach Rd. Clearly this would set a new precedent in all the surrounding area. It is clear that Vanderbilt Road can not handle the additional traffic congestion. I know there were comparisons to Pelican Bay and their high rises. You can’t possibly think this is the even close to the same……setbacks, acreage, road system etc. Thank you Nick Ruchty From:Lanesendfarm Yahoo To:McDanielBill Subject:Naples One Date:Tuesday, February 9, 2021 11:06:24 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Please consider the negative impact this project will have and size of the entire area it will affect. I’m not opposed to development but this is too much. Smaller scope would be agreeable with most of the opposition. And the traffic!! Traffic will be a nightmare. It’s bad enough now in season but this will make it unbearable. Please vote no Sent from my iPad From:Brian Leiding To:SolisAndy Cc:Burt.Saunders@colliercountFl.gov; LoCastroRick; TaylorPenny; McDanielBill Subject:Naples one Date:Sunday, February 28, 2021 4:33:43 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. As a contractor in my previous life, I am watching the story of the new development. I can tell you how the builder has planned it out. This is the way we work 1. Present a plan that we know is going no where. Outrageous 2. Appear to compromise with plan two. Some what reduced and better looking 3. The third time we come in looking like this last plan will put us in bankruptcy, but we are such good guys that we will make the sacrifice. 4. Now after tearing our hair out we come plan 4 . This is where we planned to be from the start. We knew that the NIMBYs would come out of the wood work and fight us. In all my time in the business, I never saw anyone try and push a plan that was so egregious to a very large segment of the area as this one. There is no reason to allow it to pass. Brian Leiding From:Janice Smith To:TaylorPenny; SaundersBurt; McDanielBill; LoCastroRick Subject:Naples One Date:Tuesday, February 9, 2021 8:22:47 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. It is your job to represent your constituents. I want you to know how opposed I am to this project and will follow the voting results. Janice Smith 1555 Curlew Avenue Naples, FL 34102 From:Tom Saracco To:McDanielBill Subject:Naples One Date:Wednesday, February 17, 2021 7:02:49 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Please vote against this Stock Development project. There is so much traffic already from the beach and the Ritz Carlton on Vanderbilt Beach Road. It will adversely affect our property values and for myself and many, many others our homes are the single biggest asset we own. I humbly request on behalf of my family and my community that you seriously consider rejecting Stock's obvious attempts to buy their way into this area. Respectfully, Thomas and Joyce Saracco 775 Bentwater Circle, #202 Naples 34108 From:Marcia OReilly To:McDanielBill Subject:Naples One Date:Tuesday, February 23, 2021 10:15:27 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. It is time to vote with conviction that the neighborhoods surrounding this development do not want this development as it is presented. It does not fit in with the height of Regatta or the buildings West. It does not provide proper setbacks. It does not provide enough green space. Traffic will be unbelievable on a small road as Vanderbilt. It is out of place with the surrounding area. It should fit in rather than stand out and up. Object to preserve Naples and it’s city plan Marcia Oreilly 6101 Pelican Bay Blvd Naples FL From:Jean Heidt To:SolisAndy Cc:TaylorPenny; LoCastroRick; McDanielBill; SaundersBurt Subject:Naples One Date:Tuesday, February 23, 2021 11:32:09 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner Solis: We are residents of the Beachmoor in your district and we are writing to urge you to vote against One Naples as currently proposed. True, the latest One Naples design represents an improvement over the original. But it still violates—flagrantly--the growth management plan. For example, the insistence that the swimming pool qualifies as “open space” asks you to join them in mocking the laws long in place. We accept that some development of this site will occur. But the gargantuan design before you is neither compatible nor consistent with our community. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Bob and Jean Heidt From:Jenny Kaplan To:SolisAndy Cc:TaylorPenny; McDanielBill; SaundersBurt; RickLoCastro@colliercountyfl.gov Subject:Naples One Date:Monday, February 22, 2021 3:36:56 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner Solis, In reading your biography, I see that you have stated you are “committed to insuring the Responsible Management of the County’s growth”. Moreover, your role as commissioner comes with the responsibility to set policies that “protect the Health, Safety, Welfare and Quality of Life” of Collier’s residents. Yet, the Naples One development which clearly is in direct contravention to your and the Board’s stated responsibilities continues to go forward. This oversized development on a 5 acre lot is a testament to developer greed over community welfare. No one who has walked or driven past the proposed site could possibly see this area supporting the traffic, density, height and proposed “set backs” as being remotely appropriate for this location, let alone the consequent environmental implications. Currently, Vanderbilt Beach is overcrowded on a year round basis. It is worrisome to imagine what the Naples One development will bring. What would be the criteria or justification for granting the numerous variances being requested? How would it improve the health, safety, welfare or quality of life for the current residents of this area? Commissioner Solis, I urge you and your colleagues to put a halt to this unconscionable development and it’s greedy developers who are buying neighborhood support with audacious cash bribes, and will no doubt attempt to prevail through any means necessary. Both the stated responsibilities of the Board of Commissioners and the quality of many lives is at risk. It is a sad commentary that local residents must spend their hard earned savings to stop this Goliath. It was my understanding that it was the role the community elected you to do. Sincerely, Jenny Kaplan 607 Beachwalk Circle #201 Naples, FL 34108 Sent from my iPhone From:Ken Westlund To:TaylorPenny; McDanielBill; LoCastroRick; SaundersBurt; SolisAndy Subject:Naples One Date:Sunday, February 21, 2021 9:44:37 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Received another email from Mark English from Pelican Bay Property Owners Association with an attachment letter from Julie Wyman.. As I stated in an earlier email I know no one at Stock development, nor do I know Mark English or Julie Wyman. These people DO NOT represent the majority. I spoke with a couple of my neighbors ( single family homes in Pelican Bay ) , who also do not know these people. They seem to have a vendetta against Stock Development. They need to concentrate their efforts on making Pelican Bay a better place to live . As the owner of a steel company in Michigan I never worried about my competition, I was more interested in making my company better.Wouldn't it be great to have a couple of new restaurants that we could support and not have to cross Hwy. 41 ( Safety First ). Then there is the increase in our property values because of Stocks five star development. Naples One is a WIN WIN for Pelican Bay. Ken Westlund, 800 Arrowhead Lane 239-566-7276 From:Anthony Ilardo To:McDanielBill Subject:Naples One Date:Wednesday, February 24, 2021 6:00:47 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Mr. McDaniel, Please vote no on Naples One to save our neighborhood. Stock Development is asking for for far too many zoning changes. Don't allow big money developers destroy our neighborhood for PROFIT and no other benefit. Not for the environment, the people or infrastructure. VOTE NO!!! Respectfully Anthony Ilardo From:Roger R LaFontaine To:McDanielBill Subject:Naples One Date:Wednesday, February 24, 2021 3:38:46 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Are the Commissioners looking at the data and not seeing that this is not a good idea? Roger LaFontaine Pelican Bay Resident From:Virginia Ward To:McDanielBill Subject:Naples One Date:Friday, February 26, 2021 6:57:54 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. I own property in Vanderbilt Beach and I strongly oppose the Naples One application. Virginia Ward 271 Southbay Dr. Sent from my iPad Sent from my iPad From:bk To:McDanielBill Subject:Naples One Date:Friday, February 26, 2021 9:52:45 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Mr. McDaniel: I strongly urge you to vote NO at the upcoming Commissioners’ Meeting concerning subject project. Why have a County Growth Plan , if the plan can just be ignored by elected representatives and developers? The Developer bought the Vanderbilt Beach plot, knowing what it was zoned as….he took the risk that he could “roll” the Commission to get max return on his investment. Recognizing that re-zoning can take place and is within the Commission’s authority, this Project is not one that you should be supporting. Stand up and do the right thing for the residents that you represent……NOT for those with the deepest pockets. Bruce Korda Pelican Bay From:RICHARD WILSON To:McDanielBill Subject:Naples One Date:Friday, February 26, 2021 5:10:02 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Hello Mr. McDaniel, We currently reside in district 2 in Naples which will be impacted by the proposed Naples One project. We urge you to vote against the proposed Naples One project at Vanderbilt Beach in Naples. This project is not consistent with the existing community and violates many of the zoning requirements that govern the scope of this project. It would certainly impact the quality of life of the residents of the area and surrounding areas. Thank you for your consideration. Richard and Susan Wilson From:Lanesendfarm Yahoo To:McDanielBill Subject:Naples One Date:Sunday, February 28, 2021 3:13:13 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. I strongly urge you to deny the Naples One GMP amendment Sent from my iPad From:marni chur To:McDanielBill Subject:Naples One Date:Sunday, February 28, 2021 3:07:23 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Mr. McDaniel. We have been Naples residents for 20 years and urge you to please "Deny" the One Naples GMP amendment. It will be a dangerous precedent to set - let’s keep Naples the town that we know and love and not let "big checkbooks" muscle their way to self- serving change!! Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Marni Chur 700 Myrtle Rd Naples FL 34108 From:Eileen Arsenault To:McDanielBill Subject:Naples One Date:Sunday, February 28, 2021 10:11:30 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel, The Naples One proposal is oversized and not appropriate for the neighborhood. We urge you to deny it as proposed. Growth is smart when properly scaled…this is not. Thank you, Paul and Eileen Arsenault From:Derald Dosland To:TaylorPenny; SolisAndy; McDanielBill; SaundersBurt; LoCastroRick Subject:Naples One Date:Sunday, February 28, 2021 8:34:43 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. How long will you let a terribly planned development go forward? The issue should be very clear, this is not only about setbacks. This project 1st and foremost is about a precedent to allow spot zoning, change setbacks and density requirements, and ignore concerns about excessive traffic on an already overburdened road and the public beach that is already overcrowded. Please do the right thing and stop this ridiculous development before we hear any more changes that make no sense and don’t address the core overreach of this entire project. There is nothing right about the scale of this project on such a small parcel of land. Please vote against this project and listen to your constituents. Sincerely, Derald and Karen Dosland Sent from my iPad From:kenneth stoler To:McDanielBill Subject:Naples One Date:Sunday, February 28, 2021 4:55:10 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Please vote against this project. It is not good for the community. From:Ken Westlund To:SolisAndy; McDanielBill; LoCastroRick; SaundersBurt; TaylorPenny Subject:Naples ONe Date:Friday, February 26, 2021 10:37:08 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. I do not oppose this wonderful development. As a single family home owner in Pelican Bay I have not run into anyone against Naples One. I feel Naples is extremely lucky to have a Developer willing to spend this kind of money to clean up the area. From:vapdep To:McDanielBill Subject:No more construction on Vanderbilt Date:Tuesday, February 9, 2021 9:34:07 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Please do not approve more construction on Vanderbilt or in Naples. Our roads, sewer and water table can not sustain it. Sent from the all new Aol app for iOS From:Carolyn Martin To:SolisAndy; TaylorPenny; McDanielBill; SaundersBurt; rick.locasto@colliercountyfl.gov Subject:No to Naples One! Date:Thursday, February 25, 2021 2:35:00 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Collier County Commissioners We own and pay taxes on two properties within District 2, the area which will be most directly impacted by the proposed Naples One development on Vanderbilt Beach Road. However, we feel this proposed development is wrong for all of Collier County. We feel that it would be irresponsible for any of the Collier County Commissioners to vote for a project which so blatantly goes against so many of the zoning requirements for the specific site, as well as the current overall development plans for Collier County. It is wrong to throw out all of that taxpayer funded research and community zoning and planning work to allow this ruinous Stock development to go forward. This high density Naples One plan will create too much traffic on Vanderbilt Beach Road. It will lead to overcrowding at Vanderbilt Beach which is already busy. The Great Wall around the corner site and the concrete paving of so many acres will be an eyesore and lead to unfortunate environmental outcomes for the area. You have heard about all of this from many experts. This is known information which led to the original zoning and development plans for this area. We beg all of the Commissioners to do their jobs, representing the best interests of their constituents and neighborhoods, to prevent misuse of this prime site in Collier County by a greedy, arrogant developer. Stock presumes that the Commissioners elected to represent the taxpayers of Collier County are weak and will allow them to forego reasonable, established Collier County zoning and planning. The idea that Stock demands a gift from the Commissioners and taxpayers of almost an acre of Collier County property for their overscale private development is beyond the pale. Please show Stock, and your voters, that you care about the future of Collier County and this prominent corner site in our District Two neighborhood. Please vote NO for all of the current Naples One development plans and demand a beautiful, neighborhood-friendly design that is within the already established zoning and county development guidelines. Thank you, Carolyn Martin and Kevin Martin 5601 Turtle Bay Drive and 5501 Heron Point Drive Naples FL 34108 From:katharine weiskittel To:SolisAndy; TaylorPenny; LoCastroRick; McDanielBill; SaundersBurt Subject:Objection to Naples One project Date:Tuesday, February 16, 2021 8:59:45 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioners, I am writing to object to the Naples One development. Thousands of Collier residents including me see this proposed project as an insidious monstrosity that violates current zoning codes, covenants, and rules, making it neither compatible nor consistent with the existing neighborhood. This development would be a disaster for Vanderbilt Beach and Collier County. Mr. Stock should not be allowed to bribe surrounding condo associations for their approval of a project that will affect the greater community. Thanks, Katharine Weiskittel Resident of Avalon at Pelican Bay From:Judithe Wensinger To:McDanielBill Subject:One Naples Date:Tuesday, February 9, 2021 6:29:38 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Please do not let this project go thru. It would be a travesty for our beautiful corner. It is way to busy now. Sent from my iPhone Judie From:Don Armstrong To:TaylorPenny; SaundersBurt; McDanielBill; SolisAndy; LoCastroRick Subject:ONE NAPLES Date:Tuesday, February 9, 2021 10:26:37 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. I am very much in favor of continued development in Collier County. I am a FL resident owner at 6670 Beach Resort Drive #13, Naples FL 34114. ONE NAPLES could be a beautiful and valuable addition to the Naples area. I understand the proposed plan would violate several restrictions about height, setbacks and etc. It certainly requires careful consideration before moving forward. I trust the Commissioners to make a decision that is best for our growing community. -- Don Armstrong From:maureen trerice To:TaylorPenny; SaundersBurt; McDanielBill; LoCastroRick Subject:One naples Date:Monday, February 22, 2021 5:15:08 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Commissioners The commercially zoned property that One Naples wants to have re-zoned to residential, was designed to be a laid back, 30% open area with stores and restaurants meant to serve the beach going public, and not a sophisticated. Venetian Village. The only value of this property, is if the zoning can be changed to go up and out, to the edges of the property, which the developer would love to do. This creates a Special Case, disregarding normal easements of the properties all the way up to Bluebell Avenue, or in fact, Pelican Bay, which it loves to compare itself to. Please don’t drop this walled city, with it’s 3 storied walls, hiding the parking areas, adjacent to sidewalks on this community. It’s too much on too little. It was in 2017 and it still is. Maureen Trerice From:Schultz Property Management To:McDanielBill Subject:One Naples Date:Monday, January 4, 2021 1:05:57 PM Attachments:McDaniel.pdf RE One Naples.msg EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Please see attached. Thank you, Sue Schulz-Moriarty From:HAGGERTY To:McDanielBill Subject:one naples Date:Tuesday, February 16, 2021 9:57:14 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Commissioner McDaniel, As a resident of Beachmoor, I have a bird's eye view of the traffic along Gulf Shore Drive and Vanderbilt Beach Road. When the weather is good (which is most of the time) traffic backs up in all directions. The garage entrance quickly becomes a 20 car line with several cars usually impeding the passing lane. One Naples will, without a doubt, make this situation much worse. Fire rescue, police and ambulance access time will increase as a public safety issue. I don't know when Stock Development did their traffic study but must assume it was on a rainy 60 degree day midweek. I understand their right to develop the property but they MUST be held to existing codes. I appreciate your time and efforts as a commissioner and hopeful for a no vote from you. Sincerely, Steve Haggerty From:Topper Woelfer To:SolisAndy; TaylorPenny; LoCastroRick; McDanielBill; SaundersBurt Subject:One Naples - Plain and Simply A Tragedy for Vanderbilt Beach Date:Friday, February 26, 2021 8:47:19 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. One thing is perfectly clear, Collier County planning regulations mean absolutely nothing to the Stock Development plan. Collier County Planning Regulations are just something to abuse. With every single planning target, Stock Development leap frogs beyond “that number to suit their needs”; whether “building density”, “building heights”, “setbacks”, “traffic counts”; the numbers are set by the Planning Commission and ignored by Stock Development. We have lived in the Beachwalk Community for over 15 years. Even without Naples One in the picture, it is often extremely difficult to make a left turn out of Beachwalk, due to the steady line of traffic heading to Vanderbilt Beach, on Vanderbilt Beach Road. Now Stock wants to add 172 condominium units to the traffic mix. Don’t want to even think about it. There comes a time to say enough is enough. IF One Naples is given the “go ahead” from the Collier County Commissioners, then that building becomes the compatibility target for the next one — bigger and better than Naples One. Compassion for all current property owners, in and around Vanderbilt Beach, will prayerfully speak to the hearts and minds of the Collier County Commissioners as they prepare to vote on Monday, March 1. We ask the Commissioners to deny Stock Development the opportunity to amend the County’s Growth Management Plan that they are seeking. If the Commissioners could simply “place themselves” in an existing home, villa, condo, or community, as existing property owners that currently make up the Vanderbilt Beach area, there would be no doubt that they would vote to deny. Bigger is not always better. In this case, bigger is much worse! Thank you for listening. Respectfully, Topper Woelfer 655 Windsurf Lane Beachwalk #B202 Naples, FL. 34108 Board Member: Beachwalk Residents Association Sent from my iPhone From:Cathy O"Brien To:McDanielBill Subject:One Naples - Please Vote NO Date:Friday, February 26, 2021 8:06:22 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: I am a resident of Vanderbilt Beach in District 2. One Naples is wrong for Vanderbilt Beach and wrong for Collier County. It is wrong for Collier County to be giving Stock more than $4.3 million in land value through gifting him roadways so that he can violate dozens of our zoning and growth Management plan regulations. It is wrong to set this precedent by allowing Stock and future developers to totally obliterate the intent of the County’s Growth Management plan, Zoning Code, and Coastal Management Guidelines. The approval of One Naples, as proposed, will show that it’s business as usual in Collier County, with unbridled growth, and little or no consideration of current taxpayer and residents’ desires. Thank you for your consideration. Please vote No on One Naples. Best regards, Cathy O’Brien Regatta at Vanderbilt Beach 34108 From:John Quercia To:John Quercia Subject:ONE NAPLES Date:Sunday, February 28, 2021 8:41:53 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner, When the ONE NAPLES project was initially presented, it seemed like the project was a little too massive for the small area where it would go. After the developer changes were presented, it seemed to be a reasonable compromise and as a result, I thought that the project should go forward. This seems very typical in the developer world where they give up a little something to get community approval. However, after learning more about how the scope of the project is not even close to complying with County regulations, I have changed my opinion to a emphatic NO. The height of the buildings is not even close to what is “approvable” for this area. The setbacks totally ignore the guidelines standards. To make comparisons to Pelican Bay is not a fair comparison in my opinion. Perhaps the developer comment should be that these buildings are shorter than the skyscrapers of New York City. Pelican Bay, although nearby, is a large parcel of land that is in the 4 to 5,000 acre range. Not a good comparison. Please side with the people who live here now and will continue to live here and vote NO on the ONE NAPLES item. Thank you for your consideration. A long time, full time resident of Naples John Quercia From:Vicki Heim To:McDanielBill Subject:One Naples Date:Saturday, February 27, 2021 8:27:34 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. We are owners in Avalon in Pelican Bay & wish to strongly urge you not to grant One Naples any of their amendment requests. There is a reason that the GMP was established. Our area cannot handle a development of this size. Voters such as us, will remember how each of you vote on this matter & reward or vote against renewing your position. Please don’t allow this monstrosity to be built! Thank you, Vicki Heim msvickiheim@gmail.com Sent from my iPhone From:Kathleen A. Ballenger To:McDanielBill Subject:One Naples Date:Monday, March 1, 2021 10:55:14 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Vote no on One Naples We do not want to become Miami Beach West. Dr and Mrs Ralph Ballenger of Pelican Bay Sent from my iPhone From:ROSEMARY PACE To:McDanielBill Subject:One Naples Date:Sunday, February 28, 2021 7:16:57 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. No! You should be ashamed! Rosemary Pace Sent from my iPhone From:Nancy Contardi To:McDanielBill Subject:ONE NAPLES Date:Wednesday, February 10, 2021 8:11:03 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Please listen to the people who live here .. the Stock Development is way too big for this small piece of land ! Our corner is congested already! Somehow greedy developers always win in this town ... let’s make this the exception!! Sent from my iPhone From:Judy.M.Slater@gmail.com To:SolisAndy; penny.taylor@colliercountfl.gov; LoCastroRick; McDanielBill; SaundersBurt Cc:pbpoa@pbpropertyowners.org Subject:One Naples /Another No Date:Tuesday, February 23, 2021 5:23:37 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Andy / Penny / Rick /Bill / Burt - I am another concerned resident of Naples and specifically Naples Park. I moved here primarily due to the casual and down to earth nature of Naples. It is a place where you can walk, ride a bike and live a simple life. We have zoning regulations for a reason and I expected our commissioners to uphold those when I moved here. I frequent our beaches which Vanderbilt being the most prevalent. The local businesses currently on the Vanderbilt corner are what we cherish about our place in Naples. We don’t need anything with all the cement and a “Miami look-alike” building or two in that area. I can’t imagine purposely adding a traffic conundrum to that vicinity. Be true to yourself and our residents. Let that property be used for the purposes as it was zoned. Those that bought property in that area shouldn’t be sold out. They put a lot of thought and money into their purchase and in the name of progress should not have to give up their dream. Stock’s dream is not their dream or mine. This should be the easiest decision you should ever have to make in your career as a commissioner. Hands down a NO. It should never have gotten to this point because Stock showed their wallet. No pipe-dream plans should have been drawn up and shared when they couldn’t be backed within legal guidelines. Rules are not made to be broken and let’s not have this become our new standard. What happens next time??? Another “NO VOTE”, Judy.M.Slater@gmail.com Naples Park 541-227-3260 PS I haven’t even touched on the marine life which is diminishing in the area. . . another huge topic and concern with this horrible project. From:Stepmar To:McDanielBill Cc:SaundersBurt Subject:One Naples Date:Thursday, February 25, 2021 1:03:04 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Sent from my iPhone. Stock Development is now running adds on tv acting like approval of One Naples is a done deal. They obviously take your vote for granted or do they know something we don’t. Steve Haggerty, Board of Directors, Beachmoor 201-310-9880. From:KENTON SICCHITANO To:McDanielBill Subject:One Naples abomination Date:Thursday, January 7, 2021 8:09:23 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: First, thank you for the time and expertise you bring to Collier County. Much appreciated here. I am a fifteen year resident of Pelican Bay, the last three years in Bay Colony. I spend 7-8 months a year here. It is my home and the place I love. When I decided to make South Florida my home I strongly considered the east coast as well as Southwest Florida. Having lived for years in Manhattan, I was eager to go in a different direction than the concrete jungle that is Manhattan, and which I found on the east coast. I selected Naples specifically as the anti-congestion, charming alternative to what I left. Now I am afraid....afraid that the character of Naples will change. The One Naples proposal is an egregious example of what will happen if you allow this development to take place. It will bring all manner of bad things to a heretofore quiet area. It will be a Manhattan-ization blight on Naples/Collier County, a blight that will drive attactive prospective residents elsewhere. Collier County would never recover from building this development. It doesn’t have to be this way. I lived and worked in the Boston area even longer than I lived in Manhattan. The Boston Redevelopment Authority could have destroyed the character of Boston, especially with ill-conceived development of the Seaport District. Instead, the BRA took a thoughtful approach to the long-term vision of Boston and has spearheaded a magnificent, open development to a treasured area. You can do the same. Please, PLEASE do not allow this development, a development that would destroy the Naples I love. Thank you for listening. Sincerely, Kenton J. Sicchitano 8960 Bay Colony Drive Apt 804, Naples FL 34108 From:Nancy Schahctman To:SolisAndy; TaylorPenny; RickLoCastro@colliercountyfl.gov; McDanielBill; SaundersBurt Subject:One Naples Affects Date:Tuesday, February 16, 2021 11:58:22 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioners, We appreciate all of the hours and time you are spending and have spent on this issue. My husband and I were drawn to Naples originally because of the wonderful feel of the area. We have been here over 20 years and are very comfortable in Naples. However, we are extremely concerned about the affects of this Real Estate Project, One Naples, that is proposed. Please consider all of the concerns and then cast your ballot. I am sure that you will not allow this developer to buy your vote. Thank you for your consideration of this issue. Sincerely, Nancy and Steve Schachtman Pelican Bay Residents From:Mark Sjolund To:McDanielBill Subject:One Naples Application Date:Monday, March 1, 2021 9:00:06 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Bill, You said to contact you if I ever needed anything... Please vote no, as I oppose the One Naples application. It simply is out of context for the neighborhood, and will negatively impact the entire Vanderbilt Beach area. Best regards, Mark A. Sjolund, PGA 2728 Tiburon Blvd E #306 Naples, FL 34109 414-331-6301 sjolund.pga@gmail.com From:Elaine Chase To:McDanielBill Subject:One Naples application Date:Saturday, February 27, 2021 8:53:20 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Commissioner McDaniel, Letting you know I oppose the One Naples application. Thank you for listening and considering. Elaine Chase 5555 Heron Point Drive Apt 1201 Naples FL 34108 From:Richard G. Baccari To:McDanielBill Subject:One Naples As Proposed Date:Tuesday, February 16, 2021 3:20:18 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Hello Mr. McDaniel. I am an owner of a unit in Avalon over at Pelican Bay and I wish to express my concern over the One Naples Project as it is currently proposed. I am vehemently against it an implore you to vote to DENY One Naples. Thank you, Rich Richard G. Baccari, CPA Vice President MLC Ventures, LLC 914-804-5478 - Phone 914-560-2252 - Fax From:Dorothy DOrazio To:TaylorPenny; SolisAndy; McDanielBill Subject:One Naples at Vanderbilt Beach Date:Friday, February 26, 2021 5:14:25 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Begin forwarded message: From: Dorothy DOrazio <Doraziod@aol.com> Date: February 26, 2021 at 12:05:26 PM EST To: Burt.Saunders@colliercountyfl.gov Subject: One Naples at Vanderbilt Beach Dear Mr. Saunders, On Monday, March 1, the Collier County Board of Commissioners will hear the Vanderbilt Beach Community’s objections to Stock Development’s proposal for their project, One Naples. As our commissioner, we urge you to keep an open mind and carefully weigh the import of a project of such immense, incongruous and ultimately inappropriate size and proportion that it will change the coastal balance of Collier county and set an ominous precedent for the future of Vanderbilt Beach and every other coastal area in Collier County. We urge you to see past the cosmetic enhancements and enticing amenities that Stock Development will present in order to sweeten the deal for your vote in their favor. Past experience has proven that these promises always favor the developer, not the community at large. Please do not allow yourself to be swayed by these tactics and instead, vote in favor of our future without further exploitation. Thank you, Vincent and Dorothy DOrazio Naples, Florida Doraziod@aol.com Sent from my iPhone From:marta meda To:McDanielBill Subject:One Naples at Vanderbilt Date:Thursday, January 28, 2021 6:12:09 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel, I am a full time resident of Naples who has witnessed 25 years of growth and development in Collier County. As the county’s population has mushroomed from 71,000 to nearly 400,000 residents in that time, what has become abundantly clear to me is how critical it is that our elected county commissioners make sound, insightful and responsible decisions in determining how expansion within our county is done. There are no ‘do-overs’ when it comes to what’s at stake near the main entrance onto Vanderbilt Beach. This decision that you’re making as county commissioners will forever impact this unique parcel of land and its’ beach- surrounded neighborhood. This point cannot be overstated. Stock Development is solely interested in maximizing investors’ profits regardless of how it impacts our community and county residents. Wanting to over-build and over-populate the critical location leading up to the entrance to our beach means profits over people and based on expert studies, it would forever negatively impact thousands of residents and visitors. Brian Stock made a substantial financial investment in this parcel of land knowing full well that the property purchased wasn’t zoned for the project he wants to build. Who does that? My sister has been in the surveying business for 30 years in NYS and has never encountered such a tactic. What’s even more unsettling is that Mr. Stock continues to spend thousands upon thousands of dollars advertising One Naples as a 172 resident complex in magazines as if it’s a done deal. What does that imply? Is it false advertising or is he 100% convinced that he already has enough commissioners to push his lucrative project through? Mr. Stock's actions seem dismissive, as if he’s going to bulldoze right over the existing zoning that was put in place decades ago to protect us and it worries me whether or not a bona fide ethical process still exists with regards to responsible development in this county. My final point is that, in evaluating all of the information presented by both sides, taking into consideration all of the facts presented by both Stock and our Save Vanderbilt group, the Collier County Planning Board COULD NOT in good conscience give their approval to recommend Stock’s development plans and rezoning request to you as commissioners. This should speak volumes to you and the clear message is: “This is the wrong project for the wrong piece of land. “ Please do not force an inappropriate project on our neighborhood. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Marta Meda 364 Seagull Ave. Naples, FL From:Dennis Donovan To:SolisAndy; TaylorPenny; McDanielBill; SaundersBurt; LoCastroRick Cc:Brian Maher; Save Vanderbilt Beach; Deanna Torres Subject:One Naples Development Project Date:Saturday, February 27, 2021 7:57:39 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. February 27, 2021 Dear Collier County Commissioners, First of all, I appreciate your dedicated service and willingness to represent the interests of the many residents that call Naples their home. Most of us settled in Naples to avoid the overdevelopment and over population found in other Florida cities where it appears corporate greed prevails over the interests of the residents. Naples is more laid back, you can hike through the mangroves, enjoy the feeling of a small town atmosphere and avoid the chaos of many other Florida locations. As a general observation, developers are solely motivated by the financials of a deal and will moderate their position to the least extent possible, and only to get the deal approved. Their marketing programs remind me of drug commercials where people are holding hands and walking in the park, but the fine print lists 50 side effects that could cause death or serious bodily injury – the only difference is that the developer’s marketing fails to point out all the downside of the overdevelopment. I have been an advisor to and member on many Board of Directors for companies in Europe, Canada and the United States. I expect your attorneys have advised you of your fiduciary responsibility regarding avoidance of further overcrowding of Vanderbilt Beach, environmental issues, the significant increase in traffic, the added safety and evacuation risks and other adverse factors which would materially reduce property value for a majority of homeowners in this area – and the consequences of a breach with respect to potential impact on your D&O and general liability insurance coverage . Thanks in advance for killing the One Naples Development project – everyone knows it will be a disaster for our community and there is no legitimate justification for moving forward. You were elected/appointed to your positions to represent the interests of the residents – not developers. We are all counting on you to do the right thing. Appreciate you taking the time to read this, and consider my thoughts. Regards, Dennis Donovan From:Bonnie Michaels To:penny.taylor@colliercountfl.gov; SaundersBurt; LoCastroRick; McDanielBill Subject:One Naples Development Date:Saturday, February 13, 2021 12:06:26 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioners: I am a resident of the Beachwalk Community and currently there is a safety issue turning left out to Vanderbilt Beach road. If One Naples is built, 172 new residents, their visitors and cars will increase the safety issue. It has been debated that having commercial on the 5.4 acre property would bring more traffic. Our traffic expert says no. Other issues: Traffic study: the consultant for Stock and the county did a traffic study which wasn’t long range… it didn’t include new towns being built in the eastern rural lands which will increase traffic substantially. It also didn’t include traffic in and out from Beachwalk, Pelican Bay, the Ritz and Regatta. The study was done in January and May…not in season. Compatibility: CCPC debated whether or not it was compatible. Stock quoted from a dictionary. This is insulting! We live in the neighborhood and know what is compatible. Zoning and GMP: It is not zoned for this tall and dense development. Keep the CODES! The set-backs are too small. The Regatta has 150 foot set back. Stock quotes 25. C-3 Commercial: Many residents in the area would prefer some type of commercial. This is our community and we get nothing from the current proposal except headaches, lack of safety, and more traffic. What about a combination of residential, a neighborhood restaurant, deli, boutique, green space or flower garden? This is a neighborhood not a resort for millionaires. Landscaping: It has been pointed out many times by Stock that landscaping will hide the concrete bemouth. It won’t. It is still 2 towers of 16 stories on top of a garage on 5.4 acres. We are not against development but the community would like something on a human scale that includes something for us. Many options were presented at the CCPC meeting but were vetoed. Please listen to our ideas and reasons why the proposed Stock development is inappropriate for the small acreage and neighborhood. Regards, Bonnie Michaels Bonnieupside@aol.com 847-308-0919 From:Luis Salomon To:SolisAndy; TaylorPenny; McDanielBill; SaundersBurt; LoCastroRick Subject:One Naples Development Date:Sunday, February 28, 2021 12:54:21 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Commissioners, I am not one to normally write my local or national representatives, however, I found myself compelled to comment on the One Naples Development. I am hopeful that this email is taken into consideration. As you know, Zoning Ordinances and Plans are created to manage land use in a responsible manner. The concept is to plan land use and its development to be compatible with not only its immediately surrounding area, but adjacent areas/neighborhoods. Upon reviewing what is being proposed by Stock Development and the requested variances, it is clear that their proposal falls well beyond what the planners intended for the area. It appears that Stock has ignored the zoning requirements in order to achieve their financial goals. Whereas I understand their need to make a profit as a developer, their financial feasibility analysis should have taken into account the restrictions associated with the property. Such a feasibility study normally takes place prior to purchase. I believe it is irresponsible of our representatives to ignore the intent of the zoning requirements and the surrounding residents simply because a developer (no matter how well respected that developer may be) failed to do their homework. The requested variances are material. The area simply cannot absorb that level of additional density. It is not local governments' role to bailout poor decisions made by private individuals/companies. We have lived in Naples for over 25 years and believe what has been proposed by Stock is inappropriate for the Vanderbilt Beach area and should not be approved as proposed. Concerned North Naples resident, Luis Salomon From:Jack Lentz Subject:One Naples Development Date:Thursday, February 11, 2021 11:13:21 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. I am a current board member at Falling Waters Beach Resort, and I am asking you, as our representative, to not let the Big Money of Stock Development influence you and allow them to disregard the current zoning laws of Collier County, with their current plans for One Naples. Their design plan for this site looks very enticing, but it goes against our current zoning restricting's. Letting Stock Development get away with this will open a Pandora's Box for all the other Big Money Developers to ruin the look of our beautiful Collier County. They have already started to sway public opinion with their very expensive ads promoting the One Naples plan. I think we all know these developers are only concerned about making money. They have many very talented people on their payroll to develop these plans and entice us with their WOW factor, without any regard to the people who live in and visit our little corner of Paradise. I am quite sure, if you as our representative's will stand together and turn their plan down, they will have a secondary plan to submit that will follow our zoning guide lines. It may take them two or three times before they get it right, but once they know you can't be swayed by their fancy designs and opulent presentations, they will get it right. I ask that you all stand together and send Big Money a strong and loud message. If, as a county, this area is something that needs to be developed, then sooner or later the right plan and developer will come along. Stock Development is not the only game in this very prosperous area. Thank you so much, John Lentz 6670 Beach Resort Dr. #8 Naples, Fl. From:epircio@verizon.net To:SolisAndy; SaundersBurt; McDanielBill Subject:One Naples Hearing Date:Tuesday, January 26, 2021 5:46:13 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Gentlemen: I have been notified that the three of you are reluctant to move the One Naples Hearing to Artis even though Save Vanderbilt Beach has received a donation to pay for one half of the $8,000 that they would be charging for the use of their facility. We would be able to pay for all of the expense but believe that Stock Dev. should pay the other half. As you are well aware, the facility has the equipment and room to conduct a meeting with sufficient social distancing. There is no good reason for you not to commit to this change other than you want to stifle the outcry of the residents of Collier County. Commissioner Solis, are you that afraid to hear what your constituents have to say? All of us have done our homework on this submission and all of us speak with intelligence and knowledge. Why aren't you interested in what we have to say? You are supposed to represent us! Is it your role to silence the will of the people? One might think it is. Commissioner Solis do you want this to be your legacy? The United States of America is a Republic which was set up to allow the people to speak to their governing authorities. We are in the middle of a pandemic and in Florida, some people are not surviving. There are almost 10,000 people coming down with Covid-19 every day in Florida. On Jan. 6 there were almost 20,000 people in Florida afflicted with Covid-19. We are asking you to allow the residents to participate in a forum where we can safely give our thoughts on One Naples but a forum where we can observe and listen to others as well as the Commissioners. That you would deny us this Constitutional Right is dismaying and I would urge the three of you to reconsider your roles in the governing of this fine County paying heed to the current pandemic that is putting your citizens at risk. Please reconsider your stance on this very important Hearing and allow the residents to speak safely in a forum that is available on March 1, 2021. Respectfully submitted ELizabeth A Pircio 271 Southbay Drive Naples FL epircio@verizon.net From:Rae Ann Burton To:McDanielBill; SaundersBurt; SolisAndy; TaylorPenny; LoCastroRick Subject:One Naples is a flawed project Date:Thursday, February 25, 2021 5:29:11 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. This project should not be allowed to go thru - it will destroy the uniqueness of the area and limit beach access. Development should be compatible with the existing neighborhoods and benefit the residents as well as the developers. Massive development should not be allowed - the developers should have to go by the standards and rules set for the area. This letter came to my attention so I am forwarding it to the board - praying that this board elected by the People will honor the wishes and hear the people's concerns and not cater to the greed of the developer. Condo towers near beach too large The One Naples project, a massive development proposed for near the shoreline, is a recipe for disaster. Current plans call for crowding five residential buildings, two of them 186-foot towers, into a tiny 5.4-acre parcel at the foot of busy Vanderbilt Beach Road. It makes no sense. The project is totally incompatible with the neighborhood (in North Naples). It would add hundreds of residents near a public beach, significantly increasing traffic and parking problems in an area already highly congested area. Traffic backup and spillover into adjoining streets would jeopardize walkers and bicyclists and hamper emergency rescues. The Collier County Planning Commission refused to endorse the project. What’s the solution? Reduce the size and scope of the project, as spelled out by county staff. The Collier County Presidents Council, representing some 20,000 doors in the county, urges the County Commission to send the One Naples proposal back to the drawing board. (This letter was written for the Presidents Council.) Dave Trecker, North Naples From:Barry Fidelman To:SolisAndy; TaylorPenny; LoCastroRick; McDanielBill; burt.saunders@colliercounty.gov Subject:One Naples March meetings!! Date:Sunday, February 14, 2021 8:24:51 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Please schedule these meetings in a location where everyone can be socially distanced in the same room (eg Artis Naples, St John’s Episcopal Church, Veterans Park). We MUST not allow this project to move forward without allowing your constituents an in-person pubic forum for sharing serious deficiencies that will create irreversible damage to the neighborhood. Barry Fidelman 6897 Grenadier Blvd Naples Fl 34108 Sent from my iPhone From:Susan L Snyder To:McDanielBill Subject:One Naples Marina Date:Thursday, February 25, 2021 7:48:03 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: On Monday, you and your fellow Commissioners will be hearing Stock Development’s application for One Naples. I am writing you today to express my strong opposition to the marina as Stock has proposed it. How will up to 99 boat slips and a fuel dock affect water quality of Vanderbilt Lagoon? Water quality at this lagoon has been studied by Collier County and the Conservancy of Southwest Florida for years. The lagoon is polluted and lacks the amount of dissolved oxygen many organisms need to survive. It can’t flush the pollutants because its southern flow to Clam Pass was blocked by earlier development. This Lagoon is the southern termination of the Wiggins Pass Estuary. The Conservancy’s 2005 Estuaries Report Card for the water quality of Wiggins Pass Estuary was C-. In 2017, the Report Card for its water quality was D-. Ironically, the Cocohatchee River, part of the Wiggins Pass Estuary, is designated by the State of Florida as Outstanding Florida Water. This designation guarantees the water will have special heightened protection from pollution. The Army Corps of Engineers determined that Wiggins Pass Estuary warrants manatee protection. Management and protection for the manatees in Collier County are set forth in section 5.05.02 of the Land Development Code, titled “Marinas.” Section C of 5.05.02 describes a rating system to evaluate proposed marina facilities. The purpose of the marina site rating system is to determine maximum wet slip densities to improve existing manatee protection. In evaluating a parcel for a potential boat facility, a minimum sphere of influence for the boat traffic must be designated. As proposed, One Naples marina would exasperate pollution of the Vanderbilt Lagoon and create unfavorable conditions for manatees. Building this marina is wrong.. Sincerely, Susan L. Snyder --------------------- From:Maureen Gambocurta To:SolisAndy; TaylorPenny; McDanielBill; SaundersBurt; LoCastroRick Subject:One Naples Meeting March 1, 2021 Date:Friday, February 26, 2021 11:04:16 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner, I would like to address a matter that is of great concern to myself and to the residents of Collier County: The proposed One Naples project by Stock Development. In the case of Stock Development's application regarding One Naples, two related parts came before the Collier County Planning Commission. Part one was an amendment to the County's GMP in which Stock asked for the addition of a new Sub-District encompassing the 5.42 acres of his development. The purpose of the addition was to change the current regulations that limit the density allowed on his land. His request would double the density from sixteen dwelling units per acre, 87 units, to 32 dwelling units per acre,172 units. Without this change to the GMP, the plans that he presented in his rezoning application (part two) in which he asked for two 208-foot high towers, inadequate setbacks, several midrise buildings, and other considerations could not be approved. I was very disappointed in the outcome of the Collier County Planning Commission meeting on Thursday, November 5, 2020. The deadlock does not provide the County Board of Commissioners with any meaningful input. Hopefully, the County Commissioners have a “transcript” of the voting and discussions at the end of the meeting. The newer Planning Board members were not instructed properly beforehand on how the deliberations and voting would happen. Instead, Commissioner Schmitt quickly made a motion and Commissioner Homiak quickly seconded it, ensuring that a vote be taken and that no other motion could be made. The newer members thought there would be an opportunity to make a motion that would be more acceptable to the majority but sadly found out after the voting on the first motion that that could not happen. The point that came across clearly from the meeting on Thursday, November 5, 2020 was that the developer’s proposal is unacceptable. The developer falsely claims that they can only build the original plan. If not allowed, they will have to deal with the current zoning and they claim that is worse for the residents. This is not the case and is a poor attempt to get their plan approved. The developer can certainly build a scaled down version of their proposal. They can certainly bring the height and density within the current regulations and still have the same type of project. Yes, the land will eventually be developed by someone. But the development should fall within rules and regulations. We ask that Stock respect the existing zoning and his proposed amendment to the Growth Management Plan should be denied. Stock bought the land fully understanding the current zoning. He could have and should have asked for variances before he bought it. Stock is relying on previous situations that were voted to allow developers to run slipshod over the wishes of your taxpaying constituents. Stock is apparently so used to getting its way, that it just assumed that it could run over everybody in North Naples. When Stock Development incentivizes the Barefoot Pelican Condominium Association with nearly $550,000 in cash & services to subscribe to Stock’s position, suddenly there are no boundaries for developers. If there is a resistance problem, they simply throw money at it until it is fixed to their satisfaction. The idea, apparently, is that everyone has a price. And we can expect more of the same with the Vanderbilt Palms Condo Association. Stock and other self-serving developers can not be allowed to buy their way into our neighborhood and completely compromise our quality of life solely for their benefit. This must stop. An approval of Stock’s plan would show that the Commissioners, at heart, have little regard for the will of the people, that they side with developers and endless unrestrained growth. Traffic will be increased on a road that already has traffic issues. Beachwalk Gardens has asked for a traffic light at their entrance due to traffic congestion and has been turned down. I have been told that the county states there are too many traffic lights already on Vanderbilt. So why are we considering increasing traffic and adding a traffic light for the Developer? We should deal with the existing traffic congestion issue first. The developer’s traffic plans create an undeniable surge in traffic on residential roads which are already dealing with traffic similar to Beachwalk Gardens’ where residents have to make a right in order to make a left. The drivers then have to turn around on Vanderbilt or drive through a residential area and up 91st. The developer claims that C3 traffic would be worse than their proposed plan. However, a plan that sticks to the height and density rules and regulations would drastically cut down on their proposed increased traffic. Approval of any plan in excess of existing buildings already in the area sets a precedent for all future building. Any future developer can, and will, ask for exceptions based on this case. The excessive height would become a new norm, or average, that would be used for comparison for future development. The developer’s height, set back, and density are double what is allowed. No exception should be made to such extreme violation of existing rules and regulations. The rules and regulations are in place for a purpose and should be adhered to. Changing the rules is effectively “spot zoning”. You will hear that spot zoning can only be brought up if a challenge is filed with the Circuit Court. That is the developer’s way to try to get the rules changed now so that they can argue that the defense of spot zoning does not apply since the new rule incorporates their zoning changes and allows their plan. Changing the rules so that spot zoning can’t be a future defense is unethical and should not be allowed. It is essentially spot zoning. One Naples is certainly not in the best interests of the residents or the county. It affects all of our districts. We ask the County Board of Commissioners to take into consideration the overwhelming opposition residents have to the proposed project as it stands now and vote against the amendment to the County’s Growth Management plan that Stock’s application seeks. At the November 5th meeting, only one resident voiced support for the project, and he was a restaurant owner and spoke from a business perspective. Thank you for your time and consideration, Maureen Gambocurta 619 Beachwalk Circle Naples, FL 34108 From:tightlines10@comcast.net To:McDanielBill Subject:One Naples Meeting Date:Monday, March 1, 2021 8:12:07 PM Attachments:a6523463-e388-460e-b430-d1f0a22d7d3b.png EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. From: "tightlines10@comcast.net" <tightlines10@comcast.net> Subject: Fwd: BCC/One Naples Virtual Public Comment Confirmation Date: March 1, 2021 at 7:55:48 PM EST To: Commissioner Andy Solis <Andy.Solis@CollierCountyFL.gov> Cc: Shelley Payer <tightlines10@comcast.net> Dear Andy, I have listened to this special meeting all day and now 7:50pm the calls have closed without me be called on.In advance, I’ll wait for your positive vote as you are not a very good a very poker player. Your excitement to the potential DaRuma property gave it away. Again, I am disgusted with the Growth Management operation and in sensitivity. Nice move that that Zoning and Planning were not aware of the changes presented today. After a short lunch they were able to sign it off. I guess they will find out what in it after they read it another day. Another NEW president. Shameful of you ALL. Very truly yours, James Payer 141 Caribbean Rd. Naples, FL 34108 Begin forwarded message: From: "BCC Virtual Meetings" <no-reply@zoom.us> Subject: BCC/One Naples Virtual Public Comment Confirmation Date: February 28, 2021 at 12:21:29 PM EST To: tightlines10@comcast.net Reply-To: "BCC Virtual Meetings" <BCC_VirtualMeetings@colliercountyfl.gov> Hi James Payer, Thank you for registering for "BCC/One Naples Virtual Public Comment". ======================================================================================== This is an automatically generated email. Please do not reply as the email address is not monitored for received mail. ======================================================================================== Public comments will be audio only. You will be able to see the County Board Room but not the other participants. Your microphone will be muted until it is your turn to speak. Your comments are limited to 3 minutes. Please make sure to follow the meeting closely, we will call your name out 3 times before we move on to the next speaker. Chat will be disabled during this meeting, but if you have a concern or missed your speaking time there will be a raise your hand option to ask the host a question. For those who are using a regular phone to call in you can dial *9 to raise your hand during the meeting, the host will call you to answer any questions. Please note that profanity and abusive speech is not allowed during the meeting. Violators will be muted and removed from the meeting. Please submit any questions to: BCC_VirtualMeetings@colliercountyfl.gov Date Time: Mar 1, 2021 09:00 AM Eastern Time (US and Canada) Join from a PC, Mac, iPad, iPhone or Android device: Click Here to Join Note: This link should not be shared with others; it is unique to you. Passcode: 484529 Add to Calendar Add to Google Calendar Add to Yahoo Calendar Description: As part of an ongoing initiative to promote social distancing during the COVID-19 pandemic, the public will have the opportunity to provide public comments remotely, as well as in person, during the Collier County Board of County Commissioners meeting taking place at 9:00am, March 1, 2021. Speakers must complete and submit registration prior to the Item they wish to speak about begins. Remote participants will not be allowed to receive speaking time from another speaker or to provide speaking time to another speaker. Only enter one speakers name in the field below. Remote participation is provided as a courtesy and is at the user’s risk. The County is not responsible for technical issues. Or iPhone one-tap : US: +13017158592,,81991992150# or +13126266799,,81991992150# Or Telephone: Dial(for higher quality, dial a number based on your current location): US: +1 301 715 8592 or +1 312 626 6799 or +1 646 876 9923 or +1 408 638 0968 or +1 669 900 6833 or +1 253 215 8782 or +1 346 248 7799 or 877 853 5257 (Toll Free) or 888 475 4499 (Toll Free) or 833 548 0276 (Toll Free) or 833 548 0282 (Toll Free) Webinar ID: 819 9199 2150 Passcode: 484529 International numbers available: https://us02web.zoom.us/u/kFzttRTur You can cancel your registration at any time. From:Mark MacKenzie To:McDanielBill Subject:One Naples Poject Date:Sunday, February 28, 2021 2:09:48 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Commissioner McDaniel, I OPPOSE the One Naples Project Application and urge you to vote NO and turn down the application. Regards, Mark MacKenzie 831 Sailaway Lane # 104 Naples, FL 34108 Sent from my iPhone From:Teresa McAllister To:McDanielBill Subject:One Naples project Date:Monday, February 22, 2021 2:10:49 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Please vote NO on the one Naples project. It should be kept as a commercial property. I live near the proposed project and am very opposed to it. Thank you, Teresa mcallister From:Sara Ellerhorst To:McDanielBill Subject:One Naples project Date:Monday, February 22, 2021 1:16:50 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Please vote no - this project negatively impacts the quality of life for north Naples. I cannot think of anything positive for this area resulting from this project. Jim and Sara Ellerhorst 8960 Bay Colony Drive Sent from my iPhone Sent from my iPhone From:paul bennett To:SolisAndy; TaylorPenny; LoCastroRick; McDanielBill; BurtSaunders@colliercountyfl.gov Subject:One Naples Project Date:Tuesday, February 16, 2021 12:25:50 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear County Commissioners, I implore you not to support the zoning variance for the One Naples project. We do not want Naples to become the next Miami. Naples is unique like it is and we do not want to see it change. It is a desirable place to live because of the current zoning. Please do not attempt to change that. Sincerely, Paul Bennett From:C Robertson To:McDanielBill Subject:One Naples Project Date:Saturday, February 27, 2021 9:00:03 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: We are writing to you to urge you to vote against the variances that will be coming before you for a vote on Monday March 1st. We are in support of keeping the neighborhood consistent with the current zoning laws. It is one thing to allow a small variance within 10 ft but allowing a 15ft setback when the current code is 93ft and a height variance of 186ft when the current allowance is 77ft it begs the question why have any zoning laws? In addition, where will the open space be for the community, what happens to the wildlife that will be disrupted from the 99 boat slips, how will traffic congestion be handled and shouldn't the developer gift the County $4.3M for roads and open space instead of the other way around? We are not against developing and improving the neighborhood but seeing that the zoning board voted against this project it shouldn't go forward with just a commission vote. Maybe Stock Development can re-submit a plan that is more in line with the current zoning laws. We urge you to do what is best for the community. Thank you for your time Maurice Foucher and Cheryl Robertson From:CQ To:Charlette Subject:One Naples Project Date:Sunday, February 28, 2021 8:45:53 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner, When the ONE NAPLES project was initially presented, it seemed like the project was a little too massive for the small area where it would go. After the developer changes were presented, it seemed to be a reasonable compromise and as a result, I thought that the project should go forward. This seems very typical in the developer world where they give up a little something to get community approval. However, after learning more about how the scope of the project is not even close to complying with County regulations, I have changed my opinion to a emphatic NO. The height of the buildings is not even close to what is “approvable” for this area. The setbacks totally ignore the guidelines standards. To make comparisons to Pelican Bay is not a fair comparison in my opinion. Perhaps the developer comment should be that these buildings are shorter than the skyscrapers of New York City. Pelican Bay, although nearby, is a large parcel of land that is in the 4 to 5,000 acre range. Not a good comparison. Please side with the people who live here now and will continue to live here after the developers are long gone and vote NO on the ONE NAPLES item. Thank you for your consideration. A long time, full time resident of Naples Charlette Quercia From:Eleanora Ware To:McDanielBill Subject:One Naples Project Date:Friday, February 26, 2021 3:34:29 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel, From:Mark D. Boyce To:SolisAndy; TaylorPenny; McDanielBill; LoCastroRick; SaundersBurt Cc:pbpoa@pbpropertyowners.org; emstaats@naplesnews.com; info@savevanderbiltbeach.com; marbledal1@comcast.net Subject:One Naples Project and Your Responsibilities Date:Wednesday, February 24, 2021 9:03:00 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioners The County Government Website says it best: “The Board of County Commissioners serves as the governing body of the county and has the responsibility of setting policies that protect the health, safety, welfare and quality of life of our residents and visitors. “ It further goes on to list the vision, mission, and values of the county: Vision To be the best community in America to live,work and play. Mission To deliver high quality, best-value, public services, programs, and facilities to meet the needs of our residents, visitors, and businesses today and tomorrow. Guiding Principles (Values) Honesty, Integrity, Service, Accountability, Quality, Consistency, Respect, Knowledge, Stewardship, Collaboration, Self-Initiating, Self-Correcting Take each one of these key responsibilities - health, safety, welfare, and quality of life - that the commissioners and the county should be taking into consideration in any project or matter that comes before them. Hold those up against the proposed One Naples project and you can instantly see how this project violates everything that the commissioners should be standing for. Let’s take a look at them one by one: Health - with so much development crammed into 5.4 acres, increased traffic to an already overcrowded beach, significantly increased boat traffic on the small residential canals nearby, and the removal of “green space” how is the health of the residents in the neighborhood and the county being cared for? If anything, the increased pollution, traffic, noise, stress from congestion, higher density on the beach will most certainly negatively impact the health of surrounding residents. Safety - traffic on a road that cannot be expanded will increase no doubt. The people who already enjoy the beautiful walk or bike along the roads in the area will now be in much more danger from this increase. In addition, with so many more residents and only one nearby fire and safety facility and not forgetting the congestion, response times during peak times of the year to emergencies could also significantly impact the safety of the community. Not to mention, cost the county significantly more to increase services. Welfare - if you are looking for happy residents and visitors, the last thing you want is to antagonize them with congestion, pollution, and unsightly developments with little green space that simply do not fit into the surrounding community. What are the benefits to the developments and current residents in the area? How does it benefit the residents of the county who will now have even more crowded beaches? It’s certainly not economic progress, or expanded restaurants, shops, entertainment that the area is currently zoned for that would bring long term additional jobs to the area. People bought in that area with full knowledge of what could be done in the surrounding area. That’s what great county planning is all about - letting people know what they are getting into when they invest in a community and trust that their investment is sound - not devalued by pulling the rug out from under them with a drastic change like One Naples. It simply is not going to make anyone in the area happy. Quality of Life - why has Naples constantly been rated by numerous sources as one of the small towns to live in the country? Because of its quality of life! Naples is not Miami - with high rise after high packed into small footprints, traffic congestion, and sprawling development. Communities in Naples have to date been carefully planned and executed according to well thought out longstanding zoning. Why change now? To make a corporation significantly more money? Once the dam is broken there will be no excuse for developers to not “redevelop” Naples into Miami as the opportunity arises. The attraction of people to Naples because of its small charm and beautiful neighborhoods will be gone. Having previously lived on the other coast for 10 years, and now in Naples for over 10 years I can tell you I breathe a sigh of relief every time I return from the other coast, and thank God that I live in Naples - not Miami. So, commissioners, I ask you - how are you going to honor your responsibilities to the citizens of Collier County? If you don’t see by the 1000’s of emails, letters, and other communications from concerned citizens who are your bosses and do not understand how you can not see the detriment this development does to the values that we as citizens of Naples & Collier County hold so dear, then you must be living in an alternate reality. And no doubt at the ballot box you will be swiftly brought back to the true reality of what your constituents desire. What you do now will not just affect this one development, but has the potential to radically change Naples for all time. Is that the legacy you want as an elected official? Is that what you want for your children and grandchildren? Is that your vision of how “to be the best community in America to live, work, and play”? Actions have consequences. Make sure your action is to stop this development that goes against all the responsibilities and policies you are sworn to uphold as a county commissioner and instead hold true to the vision for Naples & Collier County to be the “best community in America to live, work, and play”. Thank you. Mark Boyce Pelican Bay Resident From:maria tsakos To:LoCastroRick; andysolis@colliercountyfl.gov; BurtSaunders@colliercountyfl.gov; McDanielBill; pennyTaylor@colliergov.gov Subject:One Naples Project IN FAVOR Date:Friday, February 26, 2021 12:29:59 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioners, We recently purchased a condo at Barefoot Pelican looking to escape the madness of Northern NJ and NYC. We saw a beautiful area and we Knew that the area would be developed into residential condos making the area even more beautiful. We never anticipated the animosity we are experiencing. We are IN FAVOR of a residential building and want to be a good Neighbor to Stock Development. What we DO NOT WANT IS COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE on our corner. We have plenty of Malls and Stores in the area and we do not want the beautiful Landscape of Vanderbilt Beach destroyed with commercial business. Please approve the One Naples Project for residential use only. Thank you for your time and consideration. Respectfully Submitted, Maria Tsakos From:Paul Tsakos To:LoCastroRick; andysolis@colliercountyfl.gov; BurtSaunders@colliercountyfl.gov; McDanielBill; TaylorPenny Subject:One Naples Project IN FAVOR Date:Friday, February 26, 2021 12:27:27 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Board of Commissioners, We recently purchased a condo at Barefoot Pelican looking to escape the madness of Northern NJ and NYC. We saw a beautiful area and we Knew that the area would be developed into residential condos making the area even more beautiful. We never anticipated the animosity we are experiencing. We are IN FAVOR of a residential building and want to be a good Neighbor to Stock Development. What we DO NOT WANT IS COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE on our corner. We have plenty of Malls and Stores in the area and we do not want the beautiful Landscape of Vanderbilt Beach destroyed with commercial business. Please approve the One Naples Project for residential use only. Thank you for your time and consideration. Respectfully Submitted, Paul Tsakos From:Michael Roe To:SolisAndy; TaylorPenny; McDanielBill; SaundersBurt; LoCastroRick Subject:One Naples Project March Board of Collier County Commissioners Meeting Date:Monday, January 4, 2021 7:47:01 AM Attachments:RE One Naples Project March Board of Collier County Commissioners Meeting.msg EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Collier County Commissioners: Mr. Andy Solis, Esq. Ms. Penny Taylor Mr. William L. McDaniel, Jr. Mr. Burt L. Saunders Mr. Rick LoCastro It is my understanding that one of the condo associations most affected by the One Naples project has received a tentative proposal from Stock Development offering several monetary "incentives" to the condo association if they agree to drop their opposition to the One Naples project. They must also agree to speak publicly in favor of One Naples, and write a supporting letter to the Board of Collier County Commissioners on Stock's behalf. The package is very significant, estimated to be between $300,000 - $400,000. If this is true, it poses a significant conflict of interest because the motivation of such a condo association would not necessarily be what is in the best interest of the community, but rather what is in the best financial interest of the association. Therefore, I urge you to require that anyone testifying in writing or in person at the One Naples March Board of County Commissioners meeting disclose whether they, or the community association in which they live, have received any compensation from Stock Development, its affiliates or representatives and if so, the amount of such compensation. While such association has a right to voice its opinion on the project, such disclosure would allow you the full transparency to a significant motivating factor for their testimony. Respectfully, Michael Roe 10851 Gulf Shore Dr #1003 Naples, FL 34105 From:Nestor Popowych To:SolisAndy; TaylorPenny; McDanielBill; SaundersBurt; LoCastroRick Subject:One Naples Project March Board of Collier County Commissioners Meeting Date:Friday, January 1, 2021 12:43:17 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. TO: Collier County Commissioners: Mr. Andy Solis Ms. Penny Taylor Mr. William L. McDaniel, Jr. Mr. Burt L. Saunders Mr. Rick LoCastro It is our understanding that one of the condominium associations most affected by the One Naples project has received a tentative proposal from Stock Development offering several monetary "incentives" to the condo association if they agree to drop their opposition to the One Naples project. They must also agree to speak publicly in favor of the One Naples Project, and write a supporting letter to the Board of Collier County Commissioners on Stock's behalf?? The package is very significant, estimated to be between $300,000 - $400,000. We hope that this is not factual but if it is true, it poses a significant conflict of interest because the motivation of such a condo association would not necessarily be what is in the best interest of the community, but rather what is in the best financial interest of the association. Therefore, we urge you to require that anyone testifying in writing or in person at the One Naples March Board of County Commissioners meeting disclose whether they, or the community association in which they live, have received any compensation from Stock Development, its affiliates or representatives and if so, the amount of such compensation. While such association has a right to voice its opinion on the project, such disclosure would allow you full transparency to a significant motivating factor. Nestor and Olya Popowych 10851 Gulf Shore Drive, Unit 1202 Naples, FL. 34108 Nestor Popowych, A.I.A. Architect Nestor.Popowych@gmail.com 312-953-6777 From:John O"brien To:McDanielBill Subject:One Naples Project! NO! Date:Sunday, February 14, 2021 9:10:14 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: Below is the blanket email for our cause. I whole heartily agree with all points below. YOU CANNOT go against what the community is telling you. WE DON’T WANT THIS PROJECT! It’s a money grab at the expense of the community. VOTE NO! STICK TO THE CODES IN PLACE! NO EXCEPTIONS! DO YOUR JOB AND REPRESENT US! On March 1 you and your fellow Commissioners will be hearing Stock Development’s application for One Naples. I am writing you today to express my strong opposition to the development as Stock has proposed it. I know full well that this development is not in our District, and that you generally tend to vote with the Commissioner in whose District the project lies. But, in this case I ask you to act independently. Residents of Commissioner Solis’ District have overwhelmingly shown their opposition. I know that you are aware of that as I know that you have received hundreds of emails telling you so. I believe that Commissioner Solis intends to vote in support of the Stock amendment to the Growth Management Plan. His reason for doing so is flawed. He feels that the neighborhood is not capable of understanding the nuances of the matter before you, and that he, alone, know what is good for his District. When he tells people, “Be careful what you wish for.” he is saying that the residents of the affected neighborhood don’t know for what they are asking. I assure you that they do understand the ramifications of asking that Stock respect the existing C-3 zoning. One Naples is not simply a District 2 issue. It’s approval would send a message that for the Commissioners it’s “business as usual,” and the they have little concern for the “Miamification” of Collier County. It would represent the long-held pattern of the Board of County Commissioners supporting developers over neighborhoods. That must stop! I am asking you to vote to deny Stock’s proposed amendment to the Growth Management Plan. I cannot be more direct. You have for too long and for too often voted to allow developers to run slipshod over the wishes of your taxpaying constituents. I will be there on March 1st to hold your feet to the fire. __________________________ --------------------- From:Larry To:McDanielBill Subject:One Naples Project Date:Tuesday, February 16, 2021 5:51:25 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Please……for the benefit of our community…..vote NO!!! From:Debra Guzman To:McDanielBill Subject:One Naples project Date:Thursday, February 18, 2021 4:54:23 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Mr McDaniel, We recently moved to Ave Maria in Collier County to get away from Big Development in Miami Dade and Broward counties! Please do not turn Vanderbilt Beach into the same disgusting, overpopulated, and over developed area like those counties mentioned above. The area doesn’t need that monstrosity built! Save Vanderbilt Beach! It’s why we moved here!! Thank you George & Debra Guzman 5056 Arancia Ln Ave Maria FL 34142 From:McManemon, Jim To:SolisAndy; SaundersBurt; penny.taylor@colliercounty.gov; McDanielBill; LoCastroRick Subject:ONE NAPLES PROJECT Date:Friday, February 26, 2021 3:19:49 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. February 24, 2021 Dear Chairman Taylor and Commissioners, I am writing to express my support for the One Naples project. As you know, The Ritz-Carlton, Naples is a neighbor to the proposed development; therefore, we have a vested interest in the property’s future. We believe One Naples will prove to be a true asset to our neighborhood and to the greater Naples community. Brian Stock and Stock Development have proven time and again their commitment to first-class development. I have personally had many conversations with Brian and his team over the past year plus and have every reason to believe that One Naples will be another iconic achievement for Brian and his company as well as for our county. The improvements planned for Vanderbilt Beach Road, as well as the intersection at Gulf Shore Drive, will benefit all those who enjoy this special part of Naples, whether residents, beach visitors, or hotel guests. Furthermore, the addition of landscaping, street lighting, and connected pathways will beautify a high-profile area that has been neglected for much too long. Recognizing that the current zoning allows for intense commercial development that would draw a tremendous amount of transient traffic, I believe One Naples is the best option for this site, and I applaud Brian and his team for creating a well-considered plan incorporating input from the community. I hope to join you during public comment at your March 1 hearing. Should I not have the opportunity to address you at that time, I wanted to be certain to share our strong support and to encourage you to approve One Naples. Thank you for your time and consideration, Sincerely, Jim James E. McManemon Area General Manager The Ritz-Carlton Resorts of Naples 280 Vanderbilt Beach Road Naples, FL 34108 USA D +1 239.514.6122 F +1 239.598.6667 jim.mcmanemon@ritzcarlton.com www.ritzcarlton.com/ResortsofNaples Connect with us - www.facebook.com/RitzCarltonNaples The above communication contains information from The Ritz-Carlton Hotel Company, L.L.C. that may be confidential and/or privileged. Except for personal use by the intended recipient, or as expressly authorized by the sender, any person who receives this information is prohibited from disclosing, copying, distributing, and/or using it. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately delete it and all copies, and promptly notify the sender at the above telephone number or electronic email address. Nothing in this communication is intended to operate as an electronic signature under applicable law. From:mike hickey To:McDanielBill Subject:One Naples Project Date:Tuesday, February 23, 2021 10:29:52 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. No way nada From:Gary Scottoline To:McDanielBill Subject:One Naples Project Date:Monday, February 22, 2021 10:05:09 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. As a Pelican Bay homeowner, I am extremely concerned with what the One Naples project will do to the Vanderbilt beach area. It will overcrowd that vital county resource that so many need to have access to a beach for their families. It will also impact traffic and quality of life along Vanderbilt Beach Road, and also impact our Pelican Bay lifestyle, since folks will more than likely cut through Pelican Bay to avoid the Vanderbilt Rd., and Rt 41 intersection if the are traveling south. I must ask you to give your upmost consideration to stopping this disruptive project, no matter the money involved, to avoid making our corner of the world into another overbuilt Florida beach area. Remember, once the precedent is set the development floodgates will open! It is time to make a stand, and maintain what we have and not destroy it. Gary Scottoline 800 Breakaway Lane Naples From:Jeannine Moran To:SolisAndy; TaylorPenny; LoCastroRick; McDanielBill; SaundersBurt Subject:One Naples Project Date:Sunday, February 21, 2021 10:42:21 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioners, This project is SO WRONG. Too dense, does not fit into the existing neighborhood, too much traffic, and we could go on and on. The developers are throwing money around to buy support. DO WHAT IS RIGHT AND VOTE NO. Jeannine Moran Pelican Bay Resident From:david trecker To:LoCastroRick; SolisAndy; SaundersBurt; TaylorPenny; McDanielBill Subject:One Naples Project Date:Wednesday, February 24, 2021 10:13:04 AM Attachments:OneNaples Traffic III.docx EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Commissioners: Please refer to the attachment. The Collier County Presidents Council, representing over 20,000 doors, including many of your constituents, strongly opposes the One Naples proposal. For reasons outlined in the attachment, we respectfully urge you to vote against the project in its current form and ask that a development of greatly reduced size and scope be considered. Thank you for your consideration. Dave Trecker, Chairman Collier County Presidents Council From:Sherri DeWitt To:McDanielBill Subject:One Naples Project Date:Wednesday, February 24, 2021 12:52:19 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. We urge you to vote against the One Naples project near Vanderbilt Beach Rd and Gulfshore Dr as presently offered. Outsiders coming to our neighborhoods should expect to configure their designs to our regulations regarding setbacks,building heights, and all external attributes that would change our Naples and Collier County ambiance. DO NOT GIVE THEM VARIANCES! Please keep the Naples personality intact, we are not desperate for development! Thank you, Gary and Sherrian DeWitt Naple Residence From:Kathleen Canino To:McDanielBill Subject:One Naples Project Date:Wednesday, February 24, 2021 4:08:56 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: On March 1 you and your fellow Commissioners will be hearing Stock Development’s application for One Naples. I am writing you today to express my strong opposition to the development as Stock has proposed it. On March 1 you and your fellow Commissioners will be hearing Stock Development’s application for One Naples. I am writing you today to express my strong opposition to the development as Stock has proposed it. My husband and I live off North point Drive. We have been here for 25 years and enjoy the peacefulness of the community. If this goes through, I can’t imagine why you would want more traffic onVanderbilt Beach Rd. I’m sure North Point drive will then become a through street to get to Pelican Bay Blvd. I assure you that we do understand the ramifications of asking that Stock respect the existing C-3 zoning, and I am asking you to vote to deny his proposed amendment to the Growth Management Plan. Please do the right thing for our community. Thank you, Kathleen Canino __________________________ --------------------- From:sue hecht To:SaundersBurt Cc:RickLoCastro@colliercountyfl.gov; SolisAndy; TaylorPenny; McDanielBill Subject:One Naples Project Date:Thursday, February 25, 2021 7:25:50 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Good evening . My name is Sue Hecht and I have lived in your district for 16 years and been a property owner for 28 years. . I wish to express my extreme disapproval for the proposed One Naples project. The developer's request for amendments to the GMP are just unacceptable. It is outlandish to consider granting his multiple amendments which violate multiple rules of the GMP including density building height, setbacks and open space. Seriously---he wants the commissioners to consider private pools and cabanas as "Open Space". What an insult to your intelligence. I do not live in the Vanderbilt Beach area, but as a long term resident I have ownership and responsibility to the entire community of Collier County. I urge the Commissioners to fulfill their responsibilities to their constituency, uphold the rules of the GMP and not bend to big money and big business. Developers priorities are ALWAYS their own interests and not those OF THE PEOPLE. Thank you, Sue Hecht From:Susan Pyke To:McDanielBill Cc:Susan Pyke Subject:One Naples Project Date:Thursday, February 25, 2021 9:59:26 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Mr. McDaniel, Please be attentive to the huge number of Naples residents opposed to the One Naples project. What is the value of planning when you arbitrarily change zoning and request variances? This project is not compatible with, or complimentary to, adjacent neighborhoods. My hope is that you will honor the wishes of the "people" and vote NO on One Naples. Sincerely, Susan E Pyke 505 Serendipity Dr. Naples, FL 34108 From:Eleanora Ware To:McDanielBill Subject:One Naples Project Date:Friday, February 26, 2021 3:35:03 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel, As residents of Collier County, we are writing to ask you to Vote No to the One Naples project as proposed. The density of One Naples on its 5.4 acres is totally incompatible with the surrounding neighborhoods in District 2. Mr. Stock likes to compare One Naples with Pelican Bay and its 2,100 acres, but this comparison is completely disingenuous. (See excerpt from fellow Pelican Bay resident Julie Wyman's letter below.) In addition, we are hard pressed to see how One Naples can be a success in a market that seems to be saturated and struggling to fill condominiums with better designs in Kalea Bay, Moorings Park, and Eleven Eleven Central, all of which are airing TV ads every day ad nauseam. We appreciated all you did to keep us informed of Covid vaccination opportunities, and we hope you will now do the right thing for District 2 and Collier County and Vote No to One Napes as proposed. Sincerely yours, Ben and Eleanora Ware 780 Bentwater Circle, #104 Naples, FL 34108 ******EXCERPT FROM JULIE WYMAN’S LETTER****** OneNaples is a total of 5.4 acres... of course that is only if Collier County 'gifts' Stock with .79 acres of taxpayers' roads. (Land valued at $3.4M) but for Stock.... PRICELESS! Pelican Bay is a total of 2,100 acres; 530 acres of which are designated 'green space' and 77 acres of which were given to Collier County: 1.69 acres for the Vanderbilt Beach Branch Library; 3.63 acres for the North Collier Fire rescue, Sheriff's Station and Emergency Services; 15 acres to create Pelican Bay Community Public Park with tennis courts, large open field, etc.; 40 acres of Clam Pass Beachfront which is now a Collier County Beach Park; 12 acres for Collier County Utilities AND ... at the end of Vanderbilt Beach Road -- 5 acres of a beautiful stretch of beachfront property which is now the famous "Vanderbilt Beach" which includes land for the parking garage! That's right, Pelican Bay owned this land and it is now "The People's Beach" and one of the most popular beach accesses in Collier County! Recently along a stretch of Vanderbilt Beach Road, Collier County, using tax dollars, extended existing bike lanes further Westward heading to Vanderbilt Beach! All Pelican Bay towers and homes have private beach access. OneNaples towers own no private beach access and the 344 +/- owners/renters together with their many guests will overwhelm Vanderbilt Beach"The People's Beach" From:Susan L Goldsmith To:McDanielBill Subject:One Naples Project Date:Saturday, February 27, 2021 10:57:19 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. We strongly oppose the One Naples application. Please do not vote in favor of this, for the sake of all those who will be very negatively affected by this enormous project. Ron and Susie Goldsmith 8231 Bay Colony Drive Naples, Florida From:STEVEN FITERMAN To:McDanielBill Subject:ONE NAPLES PROJECT Date:Wednesday, February 24, 2021 1:09:44 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioners Solis, Taylor, Daniel, Saunders, and Locastro, Please find attached a letter from Mr. Brian Maher President of the Trieste at Bay Colony POA in opposition of the One Naples Development plan as submitted to the County Planning Commission and County Board of Commissioners. I support Mr. Maher’s opposition and strongly recommend that the Board deny the project as submitted. Sincerely, Steven Fiterman Property Owner From:Jennifer Bayles To:McDanielBill Subject:One Naples proposed project in the Vanderbilt neighborhood Date:Thursday, February 25, 2021 8:07:10 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: I am writing to you ONCE AGAIN in strong opposition to the proposed One Naples development. On March 1 you and your fellow Commissioners will be hearing Stock Development’s application for One Naples. Please listen to the will of the people, your constituents, who overwhelmingly oppose the project’s design, and vote against the project as currently planned. Sincerely, Jennifer Bayles __________________________ --------------------- From:Virginia Bradley To:Ginny Bradley; TaylorPenny; LoCastroRick; McDanielBill; SaundersBurt; SolisAndy Subject:One Naples Proposed Project Date:Tuesday, February 16, 2021 4:31:10 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. As Naples residents we wish to express our deep concern for the proposed project One Naples. It is quite obvious in practical terms that the proposed project is too massive, too dense for the 5.4 acres of land available to the developer. Vanderbilt Beach Road and Vanderbilt are presently crowded with cars and people enjoying the beautiful public beach. This congested area cannot sustain a project that would bring to the area the people and their cars, and boats this project calls for. Vanderbilt Beach ,a favorite for Naples residents brings hundreds and hundreds of cars each day, especially on weekends and any day at sunset time. Allowing this proposed project with this density would be a disaster for all people of Naples. Please require the developer to go back to the drawing boards and submit new plans comparable to the area and reasonable for the 5.4 acres of available land. The future of our beautiful Naples is in your hands. Please do not destroy Naples and turn it into Miami or NYC. Virginia Bradley Ginnybbradley@gmail.com Sent from my iPad From:Guy Kellam To:SolisAndy; GoodnerAngela Cc:SaundersBurt; TaylorPenny; SaboJames; LoCastroRick; McDanielBill Subject:One Naples Public Hearing thoughts (3/1/2021) Date:Monday, March 1, 2021 9:24:18 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Hi Andy and Angela, Here are some of my thoughts, based on today's One Naples Public Hearing. Although I was not totally against a residential development, substantial changes made to the existing proposal (e.g. lowered height/modified setbacks/DuRuMa) today without diligent review/sign-off by the Planning Board and staff (reviewed at lunch) is just short-sighted, given the impact this project has on this area for years to come, without public input, even if it was subsequently put on the fast track. Penny Taylor had the most sensible statement all day, regardless of whether pro/con. The changes thrown in at the last minute were just plain unfair and needed to be reviewed, whether on the face of things they made sense or not. After all this time, dotting the I's and crossing the T's is a big deal. Just really disappointed that of all people, you Andy Solis simply decided to bail on District 2, by simply not allowing the whole board and staff to simply sleep on things overnight based on a long day and substantive changes. Just shows a complete lack of respect for your constituents, even if you had already made your mind up. Steps in the right direction 1) Decreased 10/2 height and increased setbacks (25ft in most areas, but still 0 along the Marina area, with less of concern with the 10ft within the property). 2) Traffic signal at intersection of Gulf Shore Drive and Vanderbilt Beach road will help smooth out car/pedestrian traffic, before 'going vertical'. Still areas of concern 1) No discussion regarding the impact on Naples Park This working class neighborhood is often an afterthought, where there will indeed be a direct impact, including cut throughs, where there still are no east/west sidewalks, as well as property value/tax implications. 2) Timelines and associated construction/infrastructure impact Got a really vague response to this one. It isn't hard to see how disruptive this will be, given how even a 'relatively' small Naples Park water project is dragging on, a single street at a time, including companies renting lots in Naples Park. What will happen here if approved? Are construction/infrastructure planned *during* high season and what is the perceived timeline the entire project? How would a hurricane, another pandemic or flooding affect the timeline and where will construction be staged, particularly once existing land cannot be used? 3) Parking Even if traffic patterns are improved, where will they park. One of the problems with having folks pay on their way out is that it will back up traffic *inside* the garage, where there is very limited space to maneuver. In the numerous times we have gone to the referenced Tin-City/5th Ave City of Naples area during weekends (including the recent Cars on Fifth), have not had any trouble finding parking. In addition, the parking garage is free, clearly shows the number of spots available and during our visits has never been full. As it turns out, there are actually two free public parking garages off Fifth Ave, one by Cambier Park and other behind the Yabaa restaurant, which is not the case here. 4) No clear indication of how many parking spots are allotted for One Naples residents and visitors, based on the number of units, which might directly result in spill-over. 5) Landscaping that cannot hide the height of the two towers. 6) Unknown Marina impact. 7) Although adding DuRaMa to this project appears to be a positive development, just dropping this in right before the hearing substantively changed the existing proposal without review. Regards, Guy Kellam 745 99th Ave N Naples, FL 34108 District 2 From:Ralph Cowie To:AndySolis@colliercountyfl.gov; TaylorPenny; LoCastroRick; McDanielBill; SaundersBurt Subject:ONE NAPLES Date:Friday, February 19, 2021 3:18:30 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Commissioners, I would like to ask you to vote NO on the ONE NAPLES development at Vanderbilt Beach. I am not opposed to the development of this property, only the current design as presented by Stock Development. Brian Stock is not a good neighbor. The Barefoot Pelican Condominium Association has sent you a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) to support this development and I contend the vote of 62 yes, and 28 no, was a vote to accept over $547,000. (over $9,000. for each owner) from Vanderbilt Holdings (Stock Development) but not approval of the current designed development. The words of Andy Solis that financial inducement 'is not unusual' have come true. A payment to the County for property or development improvements may be permissible; however, I do not think a payment to a private organization should be acceptable and 'business as usual'. I plead with you to say NO to Barefoot Pelican and ONE NAPLES this development is not acceptable. I also believe this current design is not acceptable to Collier County residents. Please consider your constituents and their desire to oppose this project based on the one neighborhood meeting with approximately five people approving the project and over four hundred objecting. Also, please review the Save Vanderbilt Beach organization, and their reporting investigation and comments. The primary objections are density, traffic, and setbacks. The setback of ten feet along Vanderbilt Drive, Gulfshore Drive, and Southbay Drive is unacceptable and not to code. Specifically, the ten foot setback on Southbay Drive is at street level, with approximately five feet of building extension is atrocious. I live in building one at Barefoot Pelican and the result is a twenty foot wall in front of me. I am on the fourth floor and approximately 35 feet from ground level, the building next to me is 87 feet tall from ground level. The current building code is 70 feet from ground level. A reasonable change would be a building 70 feet tall with 25 foot setback. Therefore, I plead with you to reject this project and send it back to the Planning Board. I will lose my $9,000. but I am willing to donate $10,000. to any 'needing' organization in Collier County if two of you Commissioners vote NO. I am willing to commit my desire to maintain Vanderbilt Beach since I am a Florida resident. Attached is the view of a twenty foot wall (78 feet tall) in front of me as I read on my walkway. Ralph Cowie 271 Southbay Drive #142 248-914-8476 From:John Logan To:SaundersBurt; McDanielBill; SolisAndy; LoCastroRick; TaylorPenny Subject:One Naples Date:Tuesday, February 9, 2021 3:14:24 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. While we generally support economic development, the One Naples proposal represents a dangerous departure from the current vision for Collier County coastal development, and would erode what makes our area a desirable alternative to Miami-Dade. Leadership requires a focus on long term impact, and an appreciation for precedent. Please hold the line by rejecting One Naples. Thank you! John & Gerrie Logan 7944 Tiger Lily Drive Naples, FL 34113 Sent from my iPad From:Don and Suzanne Scheu To:McDanielBill Subject:One Naples Date:Tuesday, February 9, 2021 3:12:36 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Board Member, As a long time owner of a home within Pelican Bay, I am opposed to One Naples and what it will do to the western end of the Vanderbilt Beach Road area. As you well know, VBR narrows to two lanes west of Route 41 and is congested "in season" with vehicles and pedestrians going to the beach. One Naples will result in even MORE congestion in the area. Additionally, with the building of five new high-rise condos at Kalea Bay with approximately 650 units, even more vehicles will use VBR as well and Pelican Bay Blvd. to avoid Route 41. There is already an increase in both vehicle and bicycle traffic on PBB. The Collier County Sheriffs Dept. recently completed a one-month survey of the number of vehicles using PBB. Over 94,000 vehicles in ONE MONTH!! One Naples and Kalea Bay will add even more! VOTE NO for One Naples and over development in North Naples!! Sincerely, Don Scheu From:Roger To:McDanielBill Subject:One Naples Date:Tuesday, February 9, 2021 11:19:40 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner, We strongly oppose One Naples. We live nearby at The Pointe in Pelican Bay. Please vote against it. Respectfully, Roger Mann & Tessa Tilden-Smith From:Marcia Maloni To:McDanielBill Subject:one naples Date:Friday, February 26, 2021 7:55:33 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Please vote against One Naples Developement, I know they have a lot of money and political clout but it willl be too busy and dangerous for that corner. Marcia Maloni From:maryb@naples.net To:TaylorPenny; LoCastroRick; McDanielBill; Burt.Saunders@colliercounty.gov Cc:SolisAndy Subject:ONE NAPLES Date:Tuesday, February 23, 2021 1:08:25 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioners, My husband and I have lived in Naples part time beginning in 1988 and became full-time residents in 1996. Over the years we have seen major developments not only in North Naples where we live but all over Collier County. Collier County’s Vanderbilt Beach area is now presented with a proposed project called ONE NAPLES. My husband and I are opposed to this development as are many other people. I will not echo their objections here but know that each of you is fully aware of each and every one of their reasons for objection. We hope that you will do the right thing and decline the rezoning required by this project. Thank you for serving Collier County and for reading my email. Mary Brackett & Richard Brackett 432 Flamingo Ave. Naples 34108 cc: Andy Solis From:Ralph Cowie To:AndySolis@colliercountyfl.gov; SaundersBurt; McDanielBill; TaylorPenny; LoCastroRick; Ralph Cowie Subject:ONE NAPLES Date:Sunday, February 28, 2021 2:21:45 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Commissioners, Stock Development is again using their 'delay' tactics. As the result of having a contract with DaRuMa Restaurant, they would like to delay the vote on ONE NAPLES. I ask that you vote NO on the current proposal and return the plans to the Collier County Planning Board. With additional land the towers may be lowered, setbacks may be available which allow green space and be according to Code. Maybe a plan could be developed that could get approved. However, you have a proposed plan that now even Stock thinks should be changed. Vote NO on the current plan and send it back through the Planning Committee Board process. Respectfully, Ralph Cowie From:Bets Hill To:McDanielBill Subject:One Naples Date:Tuesday, February 9, 2021 11:06:31 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Writing to you to oppose the possible future construction of one naples by stock development. We don’t want to become another Miami. It will ruin the beauty & class of our Naples. Elizabeth Hill Sent from my iPhone From:nottubrat@aol.com To:McDanielBill Subject:One Naples Date:Tuesday, February 9, 2021 10:29:51 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniels: I urge you to vote AGAINST the One Naples project. I have been a resident of Pelican Bay for over 23 years and this project will have a huge negative impact on our quality of life. Stay true to the historical values of quality life and minimal environmental impact in our beautiful Naples. Follow the recommendations of your own planning dept and the wishes of your constituents in denying approval. This project is wrong for this area. Layne Tarbutton 8930 Bay Colony Dr #301 Naples FL 334108 From:Sheila Varnum To:McDanielBill Subject:One Naples Date:Tuesday, February 9, 2021 8:57:59 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner: Please do not let Stock be rewarded for this egregious behavior of resorting to bribery to gain acceptance for this project. The reason they do too have widespread acceptance is that it is too big, and does not fit with surroundings. It will be a massively big project, in too small an area, and completely overwhelm the whole area with traffic, cars, and buildings that are terribly out of scale. Please hold them accountable to abide by the rules now in place. Thank you, Sheila Varnum Pelican Bay resident From:Martin Baecker To:McDanielBill Subject:One Naples Date:Tuesday, February 9, 2021 8:55:46 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. This project is far to large and should be greatly reduced Sent from Mail for Windows 10 From:Linda Chirieleison To:McDanielBill Subject:One Naples Date:Tuesday, February 9, 2021 7:49:23 AM Attachments:RE One Naples.msg EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: On March 1 you and your fellow Commissioners will be hearing Stock Development’s application for One Naples. I am writing you today to express my strong opposition to the development as Stock has proposed it. I know full well that this development is not in our District, and that you generally tend to vote with the Commissioner in whose District the project lies. But, in this case I ask you to act independently. Residents of Commissioner Solis’ District have overwhelmingly shown their opposition. I know that you are aware of that as I know that you have received hundreds of emails telling you so. I believe that Commissioner Solis intends to vote in support of the Stock amendment to the Growth Management Plan. His reason for doing so is flawed. He feels that the neighborhood is not capable of understanding the nuances of the matter before you, and that he, alone, know what is good for his District. When he tells people, “Be careful what you wish for.” he is saying that the residents of the affected neighborhood don’t know for what they are asking. I assure you that they do understand the ramifications of asking that Stock respect the existing C-3 zoning. One Naples is not simply a District 2 issue. It’s approval would send a message that for the Commissioners it’s “business as usual,” and the they have little concern for the “Miamification” of Collier County. It would represent the long-held pattern of the Board of County Commissioners supporting developers over neighborhoods. That must stop! I am asking you to vote to deny Stock’s proposed amendment to the Growth Management Plan. I cannot be more direct. You have for too long and for too often voted to allow developers to run slipshod over the wishes of your taxpaying constituents. I will be there on March 1st to hold your feet to the fire. ____Linda & Alfred Chirieleison ______________________ --------------------- From:Barbara Rosen-Goldenziel To:SolisAndy; TaylorPenny; LoCastroRick; McDanielBill; SaundersBurt Subject:One Naples Date:Monday, February 8, 2021 8:50:35 PM Attachments:RE One Naples.msg EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Please oppose the Stock development project. We believe this proposed project is an insidious monstrosity that violates current zoning codes, covenants and rules, making it neither compatible nor consistent with the existing neighborhood. Your immediate action to stop this project is requested. These developers have shown themselves to be reprehensible. Barbara and Gene Goldenziel 34108 From:Sheldon Gofberg To:TaylorPenny; SaundersBurt; McDanielBill; LoCastroRick Subject:One Naples Date:Monday, February 8, 2021 5:10:24 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Hello Commissioners et al As a Naples resident for the last fifteen years, I have watched the rapid development of our community. Naples is, as you know, a gem of the southwestern Florida landscape. I am fearful of the overdevelopment in Naples. People, traffic, overcrowding, resource limitations of fresh water, and general lifestyle in Naples. I am writing to urge you to reject In hand, the proposed “One Naples” project. It violates current zoning laws and will open the door to additional high-rise complexes on water’s edge. You, as one of our Commissioners, have the responsibility to protect our communities from over zealous developers who by greed alone, want to impact our lifestyles. Towering buildings built on our beaches is not in the interest of the citizens of Naples. Thank you, Sheldon Gofberg 133 Big Springs Dr. Naples, Florida 34113 Sent from my iPad From:Thelma Irene Giampapa To:McDanielBill Subject:One Naples Date:Monday, February 8, 2021 10:05:22 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: Dear Commissioner Taylor: I am a Florida resident and reside in Beachwalk Gardens only a block from the proposed One Naples project. Below is the email I just sent to Commissioner Solis but thought you too should see it. Thank you in advance for reading it and your thoughtful consideration. Dear Commissioner Solis, There is an old adage not to let someone else make their problem your problem. And it appears that may be what is happening here. You and your fellow commissioners do not have a problem here; you have an opportunity. An opportunity to serve your constituents, enhance your district, and leave a very positive legacy of contribution. Is the current One Naples proposal the best possible solution to this opportunity? The second observation is that if this project moves forward in a form close to the current proposal, it will be the gift that just keeps giving (and not in a positive way). The law of unintended consequences can be brutal and is almost certain to rear its ugly head when so little of the bigger, long term picture is visible. So like the overwhelming majority of my neighbors, I strongly encourage you to vote "NO" to the current proposal. There's a better solution. Let's find it. Sincerely, Thelma Irene Giampapa 631 Beachwalk Circle F202 Naples, FL 34108 __________________________ --------------------- From:maureen trerice To:TaylorPenny; SaundersBurt; McDanielBill; LoCastroRick Cc:Pelican Bay Subject:One Naples Date:Saturday, February 6, 2021 2:00:34 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. What was not locked down during the 3 days of the Planning commission’s discussion about the One Naples Development Project, were the easements between buildings and roads and the relationship to the current condos on Vanderbilt Beach Dr and Gulf Shore North. How far from the road were their setbacks? Not 15 to 25 feet, I’m afraid. If One Naples becomes a special case, why couldn’t we begin to see a rash of 4,6 and 8 story condos wanting to do the same thing? Tear down and Go up and out, to the new road easement limit? Why not? One Naples did it? A can of worms. Vote to turn down One Naples and re-think keeping it commercial. After all with all the high tech that seems to be moving to Miami now, This site might be worth looking into by a more family oriented company. Maureenpenn From:maureen trerice To:TaylorPenny; McDanielBill; SaundersBurt Cc:Pelican Bay Subject:One Naples Date:Friday, January 15, 2021 5:20:33 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear commissioners, recently I got out of my car at the One Naples site and measured 25 feet from the curb where the proposed 3 storied wall would rise. I walked 5 feet back towards the street, figuring.that would be the landscaping area. I watched people with all their gear, strollers, wagons, skateboarders, bikes on their way back and forth to the beach, while thinking, this isn’t a normal season and look at all the activity. 400 people an hour was the figured clocked for the planning commissioners report, on a busy day. Dropping an entire walled resort at the end of two, two lane roads is not beneficial to the larger beach community. No wonder residents need more room on March 1, to express the depth of their disapproval, at your meeting to vote on this project.They are worried about their own investment, not Stock Development’s. This is the wrong area for this resort complex, as it is designed presently. Keep the zoning in place, until a better plan emerges. Most sincerely, Maureen Trerice 8171 Bay Colony Dr. Apt 2004 Naples, Fl. 34105 From:richroni gallagher To:McDanielBill Subject:One Naples Date:Thursday, February 11, 2021 8:41:43 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. I am contacting you today to voice my opposition to the One Naples Living Project as presently proposed by Stock Development and urge you consider the following question and request: Question Where else in all of SWFL is there a building with a height of 208'* rising up from a 15' setback* for two lengths of 195' each* immediately adjacent to a public sidewalk along which 400 pedestrians per hour* walk to the beach (in peak season)? *Data cited by Stock Development in their own testimony at CCPC Public Hearing on 10/1. Request Please don't fall into the same trap as did Commissioner Joseph Schmitt with the Collier County Planning Board who incredulously stated just before voting that the public failed to comprehend the complexities of the One Naples Project and he knew what was best for us. I implore you to listen to your constituents. Thank you for your consideration. Richard M. Gallagher From:O"Neill, Bettyann To:McDanielBill Subject:One Naples Date:Sunday, February 14, 2021 10:07:26 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Mr McDaniel, I am writing as a concerned citizen regarding the proposed One Naples project on Vanderbilt Beach Rd. I have owned property in Pelican Bay since 2004 and have watched how growth in and around our community has been reasonably handled. The One Naples project however is a stark departure from anything I have ever seen proposed and is a threat to our community - it’s quality of life, safety and the beauty that attracted me (and many thousands of visitors each year). If I wanted to live in Miami with high rises packed on top of each other and traffic that never ends I would have moved there. This project is too large and will create not only an eye sore but dangerous traffic flow and congestion. Even more foreboding, it sets a standard that will erode the essence of Naples. I urge you to vote no. Thank you for the countless hours of dedication you give to our community and for acting in its best interest. Sincerely, Bettyann O’Neill 8960 Bay Colony Dr Apt 804 Naples, FL 34108 Sent from my iPad From:Arnold Saslavsky To:SolisAndy; McDanielBill; SaundersBurt; Donna Fiala; TaylorPenny Subject:One Naples Date:Saturday, February 13, 2021 11:09:46 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioners: I have viewed the website and video presentation created by Save Vanderbilt Beach. I am in total agreement with the arguments they put forth and encourage you all to put an end to the inappropriate overdevelopment going on in Collier County. One Naples current design is a prime example of this. The image below shows just how incompatible this design is with the Vanderbilt Beach neighborhood. Remember, this is outside of Pelican Bay, NOT a part of it. And that huge wall running alongside Vanderbilt Beach Rd and Gulfshore Dr. is absolutely unacceptable, creating a canyon-like effect for passersby. The Stock Development’s One Naples high-rise project fundamentally disregards the Collier County Growth Management Plan (GMP) and Land Development Code which residents and neighborhoods rely on to protect their quality of life and home investment. For this reason, ... the Collier County Board of Commissioners must deny the proposed GMP amendment. The community fully understands that in doing so, the property will retain its current C-3 zoning, which will provide much needed walkable and bikeable neighborhood services. I implore all of you to vote against variances being requested that would allow this design to come to fruition. Your constituents will thank you when you are up for reelection! Thank you, Arnold Saslavsky, The Pinnacle at The Strand From:Elaine Olson To:SolisAndy; TaylorPenny; McDanielBill; SaundersBurt Subject:One Naples Date:Monday, February 15, 2021 9:39:00 AM Attachments:letter to commissioners.pages EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioners, I wish I were younger. I'd be out on the street in front of Mr. Stock's office with protesting signs. I am so upset that he is more interested in personal gains than he is with protecting the environment and being respectful to people who have followed rules and earned the right to keep their homes as they are. He is making superfluous superficial temporary offers trying to squash the rights of fellow human beings. We NEED our commissioners to protect us all. I am in my eighties and quite possibly will not be around to see how this works out. I am concerned about the children, grandchildren, and great-grandchildren who will be affected by Mr. Stock's greediness. What you decide will affect generations of people. Please think ahead for future residents. Please fight to keep Mr. Stock from building his project. It would be good for everyone to stop him. I answered your survey and had some trouble with it. I hope I answered your questions in a way that lets you know how important this issue is. I feel fairly sure that many others who tried to answer the questions to express feelings such as mine found the questions confusing. I have written before and am attaching that letter to express more fully my thoughts. Thank you, Elaine Olson 7718 Pebble Creek Circle Apt. 304 Naples, FL 34108 From:bestcutter2@aol.com To:McDanielBill Subject:One Naples Date:Monday, February 15, 2021 9:47:29 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Mr. McDaniel, This is Ronald and Barbara Baughman. We live in L'Ambiance, Naples Florida, just down Vanderbilt Beach Road from the proposed One Naples project. We have owned property in L'Ambiance since 1995. This portion of Florida is precious. We appreciate that there will always be changes. Any changes need to enhance our area. They should improve the quality of life in the neighborhood. We are STRONGLY OPPOSED to the One Naples project. This project will harm all the surrounding neighborhoods and especially ours, just down the street. The main benefit would be to the developers. When the time comes, you must vote AGAINST this project. My wife and I are watching closely and will be taking notes about who does the right thing for us and our neighbors and who supports the developer. We hope and pray that you will be our advocate and NOT support this terrible project. PLEASE vote AGAINST the One Naples development! Sincerely, Ronald and Barbara Baughman From:Sal Dias To:McDanielBill Subject:One Naples Date:Monday, February 15, 2021 8:58:21 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel, I am writing to you for the sole purpose of going on record to oppose One Naples. I am an owner at the St. Simone Condominium in Pelican Bay and see this proposed project as compromising the quality of life in this immediate area should it be built. I would respectfully ask that you not support this project. Sincerely, Sal J Dias From:Wolman, Martin To:McDanielBill Subject:One Naples Date:Tuesday, February 16, 2021 10:07:08 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Please vote against this abomination. One of your constituents. Martin Wolman From:Maureen Corcoran To:McDanielBill Subject:One Naples Date:Tuesday, February 16, 2021 9:48:15 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Bill, This project as currently proposed is way too dense for the area. Pls oppose as currently configured and leave some breathing room for everyone. Do not let this lovely spot turn into Miami Beach. Sincerely, Maureen and Tom Corcoran 6573 Marissa Loop Naples 34108 Sent from my iPad From:Chris Pisani To:McDanielBill Subject:One Naples Date:Tuesday, February 16, 2021 9:32:44 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Please stop the madness. The proverbial elephant on a postage stamp . Thank you for listening. Respectfully, Chris Pisani ( local year round home owner of 45 years ) -- ____________________________ Chris Pisani 239-595-2051 ChrisPisani1110@gmail.com From:Cathy Wheaton To:McDanielBill Subject:One Naples Date:Tuesday, February 16, 2021 9:39:36 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Please vote NO on One Naples development. Thank you, Cathy Wheaton Owner in Pelican Bay From:Donna D"Adamo To:SolisAndy; TaylorPenny; LoCastroRick; McDanielBill; burt.sanders@colliercountyfl.gov Subject:One Naples Date:Tuesday, February 16, 2021 8:53:13 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioners: I have been a resident of Collier County in Pelican Bay since 1986. I am writing to kindly request you do not let One Naples go ahead. This area already has enough congestion. Since there is no way Vanderbilt Beach Road can be widened this development will cause more traffic problems then residents are already experiencing. Most days the travel west between 41 and the beach is a nightmare. One lane going west, usually backed up to 41! Please take the time now to visit this area. I know that most if not all of you have lived in Collier for years. If for some reason you have not traveled to this area during “season”, please do so before you vote. Thank you. Donna D’Adamo 239 821-4393 From:Catherine kuzmishin To:McDanielBill Subject:One Naples Date:Tuesday, February 16, 2021 2:28:47 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Mr. McDaniel Please do not allow One Naples to proceed with this development. This area is already highly congested and this project would be a disaster to the neighborhood and surrounding areas. Sincerely, Kitty and George Kuzmishin. Sent from my iPad From:Carolyn Ferrari To:McDanielBill Subject:One Naples Date:Tuesday, February 16, 2021 11:22:13 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Carolyn ferrari 271 Southbay drive 250 Naples 34108. 7817184812 Sent from my iPhone From:Marianne Haggerty To:McDanielBill Subject:One Naples Date:Tuesday, February 16, 2021 3:59:45 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Commissioner McDaniel: As a resident of the Beachmoor condominium I have a direct view of the proposed One Naples development. I am not opposed to development on this piece of land however ONLY a reasonable development, within existing codes is acceptable. The traffic nightmare this proposed development is in itself enough to deny Stock's request. The safety issue for individuals as well as the support personnel, fire rescue, police and ambulance access needs to be highly considered. In addition, the environmental, covid, and neighborhood issues- quality of life, should not be forgotten. Other concerns I have is the way Stock is 'buying' their way into the area. The $550,000.00 cash and services offered to 'certain' condo buildings to gain their approval is unethical to the average person. (That is, one who is not normally involved in such developments ) This action makes one believe that everyone has a price and that the developers will do anything to acquire approval of their proposal for their financial gain. I ask that you deny Stock Development's existing request. Sincerely, Marianne Haggerty The Beachmoor Naples, Fl 34108 From:kpopp@columbus.rr.com To:McDanielBill; SaundersBurt Subject:One Naples Date:Tuesday, February 16, 2021 3:39:06 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Please vote NO. Too much density for too small a space relative to surroundings. Traffic congestion is already bad. Concern that development helps a few at the expense of many. Thank you for your consideration! Kathy Popp Naples Resident From:Bob Tyre To:McDanielBill Subject:One Naples Date:Tuesday, February 16, 2021 3:24:47 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. I live in Pelican Bay and am convinced that the One Naples development would be a disaster for our community. Please reject it. Bob Tyre From:ddeeb@ddeeb.com To:McDanielBill Subject:One Naples Date:Wednesday, February 17, 2021 9:55:01 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Mr. McDaniel, It is incomprehensible to me why and how our County government could consider permitting a hugely inappropriate development such as One Naples. The impact on the Vanderbilt Beach community will be devasting and change the landscape in a most negative ways. For one, the density of this development will create crowds of people the surrounding beaches cannot handle. Currently, along Gulf Shore Drive on Vanderbilt Beach, people are driving there cars to unload passengers at the beach accesses along the road. This is dangerous, holds up traffic, and should be policed. This will only get worse with a development such as One Naples. The impact of the traffic will be devasting. The density of One Naples, along with the current load of traffic, will cause many delays and impact the roads. There will be an increased number of accidents, pedestrian safety will be an increased issue, as well as policing the additional density and traffic. Currently, the traffic backs up across the Bluebill Bride for Delnor Wiggins State Park and the Connors Park Parking Lot will be full at peak times. I am a permanent resident of 11 Bluebill Ave, Surf Colony 1. I deal with the Vanderbilt Beach traffic on a daily basis. This is my home and I am not a snowbird. One Naples is not the appropriate development for the designated parcel of land not matter how much Stock Development pays off the adjacent property owners and no matter what type of community benefit they provide. The land and location cannot absorb this density in a safe and healthy manner. There will only be life long problems as a result that can not be reversed. I ask of you, PLEASE do the appropriate, proper, and right thing and DO NOT ALLOW THIS DEVELOPMENT WHATSOEVER! Dennis L. Deeb, BSME, MBA Constructive Consulting 11 Bluebill Ave. Unit #1001 Naples, FL 34108 518-857-4674 (Mobile) ddeeb@ddeeb.com From:Carla Grieve To:McDanielBill Subject:One Naples Date:Tuesday, February 23, 2021 8:20:52 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Collier County does not need a project like One Naples. (It could use more mid-priced housing.) No variances for One Naples. Stick to the rules of the Growth Management Plan. Carla Grieve (Collier County Year-Round Resident) From:Roberta Dalton To:McDanielBill Subject:One Naples Date:Tuesday, February 23, 2021 3:02:28 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Mr. McDaniel, I don’t understand why we have building codes if we keep changing them. One Naples is going to destroy North Naples. Please vote NO to Stock Development. They think because they have money, they can get away with anything. We need to stand together to stop this from happening. Thank you. Roberta J. Dalton, CAM Eagle Property Management of Naples, Inc. P. O. Box 112260 Naples, FL 34108 239-596-5567 239-598-3254 (Fax) From:Joseph J. Manning To:LoCastroRick; SolisAndy; SaundersBurt; TaylorPenny; McDanielBill Subject:One Naples Date:Monday, February 22, 2021 10:08:32 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Commissioners: My wife and I are NOT FL residents; rather, we annually visit for the month of February and bring along many family/friends to The Regatta, just a few blocks east of the proposed development. None of us have any involvement whatsoever with the developer of One Naples nor have we been asked by anyone living at The Regatta or in the Vanderbilt Beach Drive neighborhood to speak for or against the proposed One Naples development. Since “tourists” play such a major role in Naples , we thought you might be interested in what some “outsiders” think of the current dispute. The only information we have is the following material printed in the Sunday February 21, 2021 Naples Daily News: 1) Brian Stock’s Guest Commentary on Page 5B, and 2) the Save Vanderbilt Beach group’s commentary on page 21A. Here are our thoughts: A. Effect on Existing Neighbors Since sunsets are so prized in Naples, we would expect that most existing building owners in the neighborhood are upset that their view of the Gulf is about to vanish. The only way to completely solve that problem is to prevent any development from exceeding one single story … certainly an unrealistic “solution.” At some point, that land is going to be used for something. B. Growth Management Plan Presumably, some governmental organization spent a lot of time discussing what parameters to use when deciding what could be built where. It sure sounds like the One Naples development significantly violates the current GMP. If that is so, then what is the rationale for creating a GMP in the first place? C. Naples is simply BEAUTIFUL Over the years as we have traveled around the Naples area, we continue to be amazed at the many, many beautiful developments. We (and our friends and family) continue to return because of that beauty … the lush, open spaces that provide a sense of grandeur. Has anyone mentioned their thoughts about what it will feel like to walk/drive/bike down Vanderbilt Beach Drive if One Naples is allowed to proceed in its current form? Please remember that while hundreds may live in the immediate area, many thousands more will walk/drive/bike down Vanderbilt Beach Drive. It sure looks like those humans will have to deal with a 15-20 foot extended, flat concrete wall that will closely border Vanderbilt Beach Drive and Gulf Shore Drive. Where else in the City of Naples have you allowed that to happen? Our point is that instead of focusing on the height of the buildings, attention needs to be given to the very human “boxed-in” feeling that accompanies a walled-in compound. Whatever is done inside the compound to make it appealing will have NO impact on the thousands of people who daily will travel along the street because it will be 15 or so feet above their heads/cars/bikes. Finally, at first we had no idea that the DaRuMa restaurant and several of the existing condo buildings will remain inside the walled-compound. Is there an architect in the world who would willingly group those existing buildings together in a new development? Furthermore, it is hard to imagine how 5 more buildings can be constructed in that space without everything feeling that it was “shoe-horned in.” As currently proposed, the One Naples development will cheapen, not beautify Naples. Thanks for listening! Joseph J. Manning, JD 7324 Brownell Drive Mentor OH 44060 (440) 477-1072 From:George Richardson To:McDanielBill Subject:One Naples Date:Monday, February 22, 2021 2:01:46 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Please do not approve One Naples. Too dense, too many exceptions requested and too short a setback. George zrichardson Is Sent from my iPad From:ROSEMARY PACE To:McDanielBill Subject:One Naples Date:Monday, February 22, 2021 7:08:45 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. No! Rosemary Pace Sent from my iPhone From:james farley To:McDanielBill Subject:One Naples Date:Sunday, February 21, 2021 3:45:31 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel, I strongly urge you to STOP Stock in developing this regulation-breaking project, One Naples. I drive to the Vanderbilt Beach with my grandchildren and love the neighborhood feel of that community. Your zoning of a commerce building such as the Mercato makes much more sense than the current proposed monstrosity. That waterway should be open to the public as a possible community park, not a private marina for ultra wealthy residents. Please STOP One Naples from going forward. Thank you and I appreciate your efforts in keeping zoning regulations intact. Sincerely, James Farley From:Lester Frank To:McDanielBill Subject:One Naples Date:Sunday, February 21, 2021 3:29:50 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Thursday at about 11:30 am I tried to exit the North Collier Community Park (too little parking). It took about 10 minutes to exit east onto Vanderbilt Beach road because of the traffic on Vanderbilt Beach Road. I you let them go ahead with One Naples, you better widen the road to 3 lanes each way with a stop light in front of the park and double the parking with the added One Naples population. Lester Frank, Collier County voting resident since 1998 From:michael To:McDanielBill Subject:One Naples Date:Sunday, February 21, 2021 12:17:23 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. February 20, 2021 Dear Bill, The Beachwalk Community of 356 dwellings is the largest community fronting on VBR (Vanderbilt Road) half way between Hwy 41 and Gulfshore Drive. We have lived here for 20 years and seen major traffic and noise growth coupled with unsafe exit to VBR. There is only one exit, and turning left is extremely unsafe especially during the winter season. Major concerns are also with how this Stock development can flout GMP and LDC requirements: 1. We object to the zoning density of this proposal: 87 units per code, Stock wants172. Zoning setbacks require 50%, 2 towers require 93 ft. Setback Stock wants31 ft. for 3 mid rises requires 38 ft and 43 ft, Stock wants 15 ft. 2. Open space requires 30% open, Stock includes major amenities (pools, cabanas). 3. Zoning requires compatibility and consistence with the existing neighborhood. 4.  Traffic issues not addressed. TSI has not considered the Beachwalk Communit y and the nearby communities of Naples Park and Pelican Bay. Transportation has not considered seasonal traffic, emergency exits, or growth from beach traffic growth from Collier east. 5. VBR is currently considered a near failing road (category E) and will surely fail with the proposed increased traffic from Stock and Collier growth. Conclusion: Let’s us keep the current C-1,2,3 zoning even if there is some additional traffic (which is doubtful). It would better serve the community than Shoehorning the proposed monster development Into this small corner. “There is no, planning when a commission can arbitrarily change Zoning and Growth management policy to approve these variances which also conflict with safety, community rights and common sense.” Michael Seef Tel: 239-596-9135 From:Bev Cohen To:McDanielBill Cc:bevchn@gmail.com Subject:One Naples Date:Sunday, February 21, 2021 11:17:52 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. February 21, 2021 Dear Mr. McDaniel, My husband and I have had a residence in Pelican Bay since 1986, and, in 2015, became Florida residents. Over the years we have obviously seen remarkable growth in our area. The majority of communities within Pelican Bay exit their neighborhoods onto Pelican Bay Boulevard. In season, it can take as much as 4-5 minutes to get onto the Boulevard at various times during the day because of heavy traffic. The roadway has become a cut through for drivers avoiding the lights on 41, both north and south. Additionally, pedestrians cross the Blvd at various points along this roadway to head to the beach or walk along the Pelican Bay Berm. Although Pelican Bay Boulevard is a 4-lane roadway (2 southbound lanes; 2 northbound lanes) two of those lanes are dedicated for cyclists, essentially rendering the Boulevard a 2-lane road. To date, we have not seen a traffic study that has addressed this fact. Pelican Bay Boulevard was intended to be a community roadway within the Pelican Bay community -it was never intended to be a major thoroughfare. I have witnessed car and bike accidents on the Boulevard over the past several years – a concerning situation that will only become even more so with increased traffic from One Naples. Impatient drivers heading east from One Naples to 41 will avoid traffic lights on both Vanderbilt Beach Road and 41 by either heading through neighborhoods in North Naples or onto Pelican Bay Boulevard. The One Naples Development will forever change the complexion of the Pelican Bay community and the neighborhoods of North Naples. The increase in traffic will certainly have a negative impact on the neighborhoods’ quality of life, and, additionally, on our property values. We have witnessed the tremendous growth that has occurred in Collier County for over 30 years, and the changes in zoning that have allowed more development to take place. At what point does this seemingly unstoppable development render Naples no longer one of the most desirable places to live? The One Naples property should remain commercial. Thank you. Beverly and Robert Cohen 7919 Vizcaya Way From:Tom Glennon To:McDanielBill Subject:One Naples Date:Sunday, February 21, 2021 11:13:06 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. As a neighbor of this proposed monster I feel as though I need to add my feelings. Since you do not live along Vanderbilt Beach Road or near its beach, you have no connection to the community that does. Please do not hand over the tax payers land or accept this monster of a building on the corner. Please think of those who live here now. Thank you Thomas Glennon 559 Beachwalk Circle From:jonimcv@aol.com To:McDanielBill Subject:One Naples Date:Wednesday, February 24, 2021 3:25:06 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Mr. McDaniel, Please don’t be swayed by a big development corporation that wants to change the footprint of the Vanderbilt Beach area! Over 10 years ago I was fortunate to purchase a small condo not far from where the One Naples project is planned. As much as I loved coming down to enjoy the beaches and wonderful lifestyle of Southwest Florida, I could never stay for any long periods as I still worked. At last, I have now retired and can look forward to extended stays with friends and family. The only problem is this large scale development that threatens the natural beauty, peace and resources of this area. The very thing that convinced me to use savings and buy a slice of “heaven” is now in danger of being taken away. I don’t see how this project will benefit anyone in the long term except the people involved in its over development. While I count myself fortunate to even own property in this location, I must object to such major construction that will forever change the landscape. Believe me, I live in downstate New York and know what over development looks like. Once you go there you can never go back. I implore you to continue your good stewardship of our town and protect our habitat! Thank you for making the right decision to best serve the people, wildlife and resources of Vanderbilt Beach. Sincerely, Joan Verardo From:Staros, Edward To:SolisAndy; SaundersBurt; penny.taylor@colliercounty.gov; McDanielBill; LoCastroRick Subject:One Naples Date:Wednesday, February 24, 2021 3:07:01 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Collier County Commissioners, As a full time resident of Naples since September of 1999, as well as a business developer since March of 1983, I wanted to let you know that I am 100% fully supportive of Brian Stock’s One Naples project. As the third employee of The Ritz-Carlton Hotel Company, I was here for the groundbreaking of The Ritz-Carlton Naples and subsequently was part of the development, operational staffing and training of this iconic Hotel. Since that day of groundbreaking, circa April of 1983, I / we have wanted a premier residential next door neighbor on the site in question , which is exactly what Brian Stock has planed in the One Naples Development. I should also mention that over the past 20+ / - years I have gotten to know Brian very well and I am personally thrilled that Stock Development purchased this very difficult and awkward site and has come up with a beautiful residential plan for the neighborhood. Brian did this through the countless neighborhood meetings by listening to the public, modifying his plan and to do the right thing for the neighborhood. How many developers do you know that has had so many community meetings , listened, learned & reacted to the concerns of the neighborhood. The answer is very few developers would have been so accommodating. I very much hope that you take this support from a person that knows a lot about product & service excellence and know, that I believe in Brian Stock, I believe in One Naples as the right product for North Naples / Vanderbilt Beach Community and I believe this premier development will serve our community well . My very best regards to all of you, Ed Edward V. Staros Executive-in-Residence School of Resort and Hospitality Management /Lutgert College of Business 10501 FGCU Boulevard South, Fort Myers, FL 33965 | fgcu.edu P: 239 590 7854 | E: estros@fgcu.edu| C: 239 248 2501 Under Florida law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your email address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by phone or in writing. _________________________________________________________________ From:carole feagler To:McDanielBill Subject:One Naples Date:Wednesday, February 24, 2021 12:11:10 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel, Obviously, all of the information shows that the covenants and codes have not been followed, the mass is not in keeping with the neighborhood, the current owners have been thrown into terrible stress over all of this, even losing friendships over it, and it will cause the worst, most dangerous traffic situations and the overcrowding at the Vanderbilt Beach area will incite confrontations over parking and access. Also of great concern is the terrible invasion of the lagoon and it’s existing sea life. All of this is due to this developer’s greed. It is the wrong place for him, the wrong time for him, and no one is going to forget this travesty if it passes. NO MATTER WHAT OTHER GOOD THINGS YOU HAVE ACCOMPLISHED IN YOUR TERM, YOUR LEGACY AND REPUTATION RIDE ON MAKING THE RIGHT DECISION WHICH IS TO VOTE NO ON ONE NAPLES. HOW DO YOU WANT TO BE REMEMBERED? Sincerely, Carole and Nick Feagler Pelican Bay Residents (30 years) From:Kathy To:SolisAndy; TaylorPenny; McDanielBill; SaundersBurt; LoCastroRick Subject:One Naples Date:Wednesday, February 24, 2021 9:38:08 AM Attachments:Dear Commissioners.docx EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Sent from Mail for Windows 10 From:Meg Tyre To:McDanielBill Subject:One Naples Date:Friday, February 19, 2021 11:56:11 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. I am writing to you to urge you to reject the Stock Development application. Naples is not Miami and that’s the way we like it. Please protect our community. Meg Tyre Pelican Bay From:Katherine Tardio To:McDanielBill Subject:One Naples Date:Wednesday, February 17, 2021 2:30:47 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Mr. McDaniel, One of the sad events in today’s world is, “If you don’t like a ruling and you have money, you can pay and if you offer enough goods or services, you can change an established norm”. The Naples Daily News said that Stock Brothers have been here for 20 years. I have been here longer. I hope that our Commissioners, You, can’t be bought and will vote for what is best for the whole, your neighbors, and not just Stock Brothers. Thank you, Katherine Tardio From:Craig Bradley To:SolisAndy; TaylorPenny; LoCastroRick; McDanielBill; SaundersBurt Subject:One Naples Date:Wednesday, February 17, 2021 2:27:15 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. After studying the proposed development plan by Stock we strongly oppose the plan as presented. Craig Bradley C8787b@gmail.com Sent from my iPhone From:Judithe Wensinger To:McDanielBill Subject:One Naples Date:Tuesday, February 9, 2021 6:25:29 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Please vote this project down. What a travesty this would cause to our little corner. Sent from my iPhone Judie From:jeannef01@comcast.net To:McDanielBill Subject:One Naples Date:Thursday, February 25, 2021 11:17:18 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner Mc Daniels: Please vote against One Naples. It would negatively affect the lives of the residents and the atmosphere of the community. Thank you. Jeanne Faup Sent from my iPad From:bill eason To:McDanielBill Subject:One Naples Date:Thursday, February 25, 2021 3:31:46 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. I oppose the project. I am a full time Pelican Bay resident as is my wife Bill Eason 404-219-3479 bluechipflyer@gmail.com From:bill eason To:McDanielBill Subject:One Naples Date:Thursday, February 25, 2021 3:30:37 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. I oppose the project. I am a full time Pelican Bay resident Bill Eason 404-219-3479 bluechipflyer@gmail.com From:Marcia Maloni To:McDanielBill Subject:One Naples Date:Friday, February 26, 2021 7:55:04 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Please vote against One Naples Developement, I know they have a lot of money and political clout but it willl be too busy and dangerous for that corner. Marcia Maloni From:rlmoore52@aol.com To:andy.soltis@colliercountyfl.gov; TaylorPenny; rick@ricklocastro.com; McDanielBill; SaundersBurt Cc:rlmoore52@aol.com Subject:One Naples Date:Friday, February 26, 2021 9:50:35 AM Attachments:RE One Naples.msg EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioners, One more time, please make Stock and One Naples adhere to Collier County Codes for height, set backs and density as other Collier County Condo Associations and HOA must do. Please vote NO March 1, 2021. Robert L Moore 20549 Gulf Shore Drive #502 Naples, FL 34108 239-566-1543 From:tina seely To:McDanielBill Subject:One Naples Date:Friday, February 26, 2021 1:06:47 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Good morning, Just wanted to send a quick email to say I am very excited about the One Naples community coming to our corner!! It will bring needed improvements. Sidewalks, lights, beautiful landscaping and wider street. Which is needed. I hope that it stays mostly residential. I live at the Barefoot Pelican. We bought 11 years ago. It is a wonderful corner. My wishes is that you as Commissioner’s will make a decision and do it quickly. We feel fortunate to have Stock Development involved in our slice of heaven corner. I have worked with them in the past and only have kind words to say. Please be part of moving this along. It seems like years that we have had to deal with this decision. I have two places at Barefoot Pelican and we are so very excited to see our corner in the near future! Thank you, Tina Seely From:Virgie Lombardo To:McDanielBill Subject:One Naples Date:Saturday, February 27, 2021 11:26:28 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. I oppose of One Naples I live in Pelican Bay, next to Vanderbilt Rd. Virgie Lombardo Sent from my iPad From:Pam To:McDanielBill Subject:One Naples Date:Friday, February 26, 2021 10:45:12 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Mr McDaniel: I will not innumerate the hundreds of reasons why the Vanderbilt Beach area must not be developed, because I’m sure thousands of people have been doing this for awhile. My husband and I live in District 2 and have been totally aghast that anyone would put forth such a horrible and thoughtless, really devastating plan. I have actually developed TMJ from the stress, concern and worry of this selfish, greedy and evil plan. We would like you to vote AGAINST this development, and for your constituents being happy, thankful and continuing their wonderful, fulfilling lives here in North Naples. Please take careful care of our beautiful beach and neighborhood. We have heard that this situation has already been decided, and that the commissioners always vote for the developers. It is very scary when our destiny is put in other people’s hands, and we’re not sure if they will be true to our wishes, hopes and preferences. Kindly do the right thing, Pamela Weisgerber From:startmeup1@gmail.com To:TaylorPenny; LoCastroRick; McDanielBill; SaundersBurt Subject:One Naples Date:Sunday, February 28, 2021 3:02:52 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. I am against One Naples. Stock’s purchase of DaRuMa does not change things if they move their setbacks. It will make the property worse. Stock will continue to pursue additional giveback from our government until you give up. DON’T GIVE IN to Stock. Richard Arikian Pelican Bay From:M. Lopez To:McDanielBill Subject:One Naples Date:Sunday, February 28, 2021 2:11:45 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Commissioner, please do not approve this project, either approve commercial building as properly zoned or a park with a public dock. R/Miguel Lopez Sent from my iPhone From:Jack Rabin To:SolisAndy; TaylorPenny; McDanielBill; SaundersBurt; ricklocastro@colliercountyfl.gov Subject:One Naples Date:Sunday, February 28, 2021 1:19:38 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioners: Your role as commissioner comes with the responsibility to set policies that “protect the Health, Safety, Welfare and Quality of Life” of Collier’s residents. Yet, the Naples One development which clearly is in direct contravention to the Board’s stated responsibilities continues to go forward. This oversized development on a 5 acre lot is a testament to developer greed over community welfare. No one who has walked or driven past the proposed site could possibly see this area supporting the traffic, density, height and proposed “set backs” as being remotely appropriate for this location, let alone the consequent environmental implications. Currently, Vanderbilt Beach is overcrowded yearly. Imagine what the Naples One development will bring. There should be NO criteria or justification for granting the numerous variances being requested. Those variances would in no way improve the health, safety, welfare or quality of life for the current residents of this area. Commissioners, I urge you and your colleagues to put a halt to this unconscionable development. The quality of many lives is at risk. It is my understanding that it was the role the communities elected you to do. Sincerely, Arthur Jack and Susan Rabin From:CHARLES To:McDanielBill Subject:One Naples Date:Sunday, February 28, 2021 9:01:25 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Please reject this project. It does not benefit Naples. Charles Berry 239 595 1840 North Naples From:carol volpe To:McDanielBill Subject:One Naples Date:Sunday, February 28, 2021 9:43:46 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. It’s simple. Follow current zoning laws. Stock bought commercial land, not residential. Vote NO on one Naples. Pelican Bay resident Carol Volpe Carol Volpe From:Arthur C Mueller To:McDanielBill Subject:One Naples Date:Sunday, February 28, 2021 7:08:09 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Any one one the variance requests from Stock Developments should be enough to sink this project. I can’t even believe it’s being considered. The commission has allowed this to happen time and time again. A developer pays too much for a property and then pays more to try to pressure the commissioners. Put an end to this ridiculous cycle. VOTE NO ON ONE NAPLES! Art & Ellen Mueller Pelican Bay Sent from my iPad From:John Houldsworth To:SaundersBurt; TaylorPenny; SolisAndy; McDanielBill Subject:One Naples Date:Monday, March 1, 2021 6:27:40 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Mr. Stock says think of Mercado. Yes, a 3 story mixed use development would be perfect for this site. Not 12 story towers. Sent from my iPhone From:John Houldsworth To:SaundersBurt; TaylorPenny; SolisAndy; McDanielBill Subject:One Naples Date:Monday, March 1, 2021 6:27:40 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Mr. Stock says think of Mercado. Yes, a 3 story mixed use development would be perfect for this site. Not 12 story towers. Sent from my iPhone From:Carol Farmer To:McDanielBill Subject:One Naples Date:Monday, March 1, 2021 11:35:13 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. We Strongly OPPOSE the One Naples application!! Carol & Tracy Farmer, 8665 Bay Colony Dr., Naples Sent from my iPhone From:Cherie Bawduniak To:McDanielBill Subject:One Naples Date:Monday, March 1, 2021 8:20:51 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. DENY THE ONE NAPLES GMP AMENDMENT Cherie and Joe Bawduniak 34109 From:sseifried To:McDanielBill Cc:sseifried Subject:One Naples Date:Sunday, February 28, 2021 8:55:02 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Sent via the Samsung Galaxy S10e, an AT&T 5G Evolution capable smartphone From:Joan Hanlon To:McDanielBill Subject:One Naples Date:Sunday, February 28, 2021 8:50:50 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner, Please do not approve One Naples. The variances this developer wants are extensive and will not be good for our city. Thank you in advance, Joan Hanlon Sent from my iPhone Sent from my iPhone From:Johan Domenie To:SolisAndy; Penny.Taylor@colliercounty.gov; LoCastroRick; SaundersBurt; McDanielBill Subject:One Naples Date:Sunday, February 28, 2021 8:45:59 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner: I have been a year round resident of Collier County since 1987 and live off Vanderbilt Beach Road. I have witnessed ceaseless growth of developments with massive traffic tie-ups at rush hours. All traffic is limited to just a few East/West and North/South roads – the only apparent solution is to widen small two lane roads to four lanes, six lanes and even more lanes at intersections – but you are running out of land to continue widening roads so you must look elsewhere – adhere to limits of growth which have been established by previous administrations. One Naples is one such development which must stop this process. Vanderbilt Beach Road traffic is already six laned all the way to Airport-Pulling Road and the section from Airport-Pulling to US-41 has already been approved for future widening to six lanes. However from US-41 to the proposed One Naples it suddenly drops to two lanes. How Commissioner ,are two lanes going to handle the additional traffic coming to Vanderbilt Beach plus the proposed traffic to One Naples. In future years will you be accused for permitting One Naples to destroy the Vanderbilt Community???? The property is zoned Commercial and a small market or other stores would attract local traffic and would NOT increase Vanderbilt Beach Road traffic as Stock alleges. At the moment I have counted as many as 16 vehicles at the Hammock Oak and North Pointe Drive traffic lights. Just a reminder: Hammock Oak is the location of a Fire Station, EMS facility and Police Station. How can they reach an emergency on Gulf Shore Blvd if cars are blocking this two lane road-way. Are you willing to take this risk? Johan Domenie 749 Bentwater Circle 239-325-8179 From:kip mckesson To:McDanielBill Subject:One Naples Date:Sunday, February 28, 2021 8:06:08 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. I oppose the One Naples application. Please vote against. Christopher McKesson Naples From:Barb To:McDanielBill Subject:One Naples Date:Sunday, February 28, 2021 7:48:12 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Please deny the One Naples GMP amendment. Vanderbilt Beach is one of the few beaches I truly enjoy still in Naples and bring family to when they visit our beautiful paradise. The addition of this development will only make it a nightmare to drive and walk around that area. Please consider the residents who still want to be able to access the beaches here in Collier county. Thanks, Barb Senkevich -- This email has been checked for viruses by AVG. https://www.avg.com From:Kathie To:McDanielBill Subject:One Naples Date:Sunday, February 28, 2021 6:22:54 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Please do not approve this development in our quiet and peaceful neighborhood. There is already too much traffic and too many parking issues in this area. The area is too small and high rises will change the look and feel of this charming area. Robert & Mary Von Gruben Sent from my iPhone From:Janet Lieb To:McDanielBill Subject:One Naples Date:Sunday, February 28, 2021 5:33:25 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Iam highly opposed to One Naples! Charlie Lieb 9653 Gulfshore Drive Naples Fl Sent from my iPhone From:Janet Lieb To:McDanielBill Subject:One Naples Date:Sunday, February 28, 2021 5:32:27 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Iam highly opposed to One Naples! Charlie Lieb 9653 Gulfshore Drive Naples FL Sent from my iPhone From:Susan McManus To:SaundersBurt; SolisAndy; TaylorPenny; LoCastroRick; McDanielBill Subject:One Naples Date:Sunday, February 28, 2021 4:33:04 PM Attachments:image003.png image004.png image002.png EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Collier County Commissioners, The Stock family have been investing in the quality of our community for many years, supporting local schools through their support of Champions For Learning. They have a reputation of caring about the well-being of families and have shared their time, talent and treasure in support of education in Collier County. I do not want to express my opinion either way with regard to your decisions concerning One Naples, as that is something that you will have to determine what is best for the community. I do want to express my appreciation for a family company that has demonstrated a long standing history of doing what is best for the community in its generous support for teachers and students. During this pandemic, hurricanes, and recessions, they have never failed in their financial support for Champions For Learning programs that helped students, families and educators achieve their goals for their future. I know that they have a true commitment to the quality of life and share their success with the community. I acknowledge how difficult this decision will be for you and wanted to take a moment to remind you of their reputation of support for our community. Sincerely, Susan McManus Creating life-changing learning experiences for every student. Make a contribution today! Susan McManus President 3606 Enterprise Avenue, #150 Naples, FL 34104 Direct: 239-687-1378 Office: 239-643-4755 Fax: 239-643-4799 SMcManus@ChampionsForLearning.org www.ChampionsForLearning.org Disclaimer The information contained in this communication from the sender is confidential. It is intended solely for use by the recipient and others authorized to receive it. If you are not the recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or taking action in relation of the contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. This email has been scanned for viruses and malware, and may have been automatically archived by Mimecast Ltd, an innovator in Software as a Service (SaaS) for business. Providing a safer and more useful place for your human generated data. Specializing in; Security, archiving and compliance. To find out more Click Here. From:nancydee1@comcast.net To:nancydee1@comcast.net Subject:One Naples Date:Sunday, February 28, 2021 4:15:42 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Please deny Stock Development application for variance on One Naples Project. Since they have DaRuMa parcel under contract, then they need to revise and resubmit their planned development application. Thank you for being fair minded in your consideration. Nancy McPeak 9566 Gulf Shore Dr. PH4 Naples, FL 34108 239-595-2467 (Cell) From:Steve Valdivia To:McDanielBill Subject:One Naples Date:Sunday, February 28, 2021 4:13:33 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. The Honorable Bill McDaniel, Please do not approve the One Naples development as now designed as it will set a terrible precedent by resetting building and zoning codes for this part of the state, forever! The recent DaRuMa purchase is a good move but what of the rest? How does this change anything? You can send STOCK back to the drawing boards simply by asking key questions to county planning staff. They see this as a bad sign going forward for the entire county. Steve Valdivia 260 Southbay Dr # 212 Naples Fl 34108 From:Carolyn Ferrari To:McDanielBill Subject:One Naples. Date:Tuesday, February 16, 2021 9:19:54 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Please vote no on the above project. To massive for the neighborhood. Carolynjferrari. Barefoot pelican Sent from my iPhone From:MARCIA MARTELL To:McDanielBill Subject:One Naples....traffic is the problem Date:Sunday, February 28, 2021 4:28:11 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Please vote NO!!!! Sent from my iPad From:Laura A. To:McDanielBill Subject:ONE Naples Date:Thursday, February 25, 2021 6:52:02 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Pease vote NO. We live in Pelican Bay, just off Vanderbilt Beach Rd., and it’s too busy as it is! The beach and inner bays also need our protection. Thanks, The Arnolds From:brentson@aol.com To:McDanielBill Subject:One Naples/Stock Development Date:Friday, February 26, 2021 11:04:01 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Hi Bill, I’m writing about One Naples, but my view applies to every variance application made in Collier County. To me, it’s very simple: there are only two reasons to even CONSIDER making an exception to a rule or policy: 1. It’s a bad rule, or was misapplied, or 2. This is an EMERGENCY (i.e., imminent loss of life or property). No. 1? I don’t think so. No. 2? Not a chance. It’s a no-brainer—vote NO, Bill. That was easy! Brent Smith Naples resident From:Susan Demoulas To:McDanielBill Subject:One Naples/Stock Date:Tuesday, February 23, 2021 4:40:57 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Mr. McDaniel, I am a resident of Naples living at Twin Eagles off Immolake Road. It seems to me that Stock has once again attempted to circumvent the County’s Growth Management Plan. I cannot believe that anybody thinks a new build of those dimensions would benefit Naples, the beaches or the people who live and drive and bike and walk in that area. The Stock company surely knew the rules when they bought the property. Why did they think they could do whatever they wanted on that piece of property? I hope you will vote against this proposal and that you will convince your fellow District Commissioners to do the same. This project needs serious downsizing! Susan Demoulas 12586 Fenhurst Way Naples, FL 34120 Sent from Mail for Windows 10 From:Michael Tucker To:McDanielBill Subject:One Naples--Please Consider My Concerns! Date:Monday, February 22, 2021 2:02:50 PM Attachments:image003.png EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Hi Bill, A short and simple email to let you know that as a Beachwalk resident I am very concerned about the effect of Naples One on our property value and quality of life—especially the increased traffic and crowded beach. Will you please consider this when voting on the project? Thanks, Mike Michael W. Tucker TECHNICOM, INC. 583 Beachwalk Circle #102 Naples, FL 34108-8730 CELL: (704) 905-0513 www.technicom-inc.com From:GrecoSherry To:LoCastroRick; SaundersBurt; McDanielBill; SolisAndy Cc:FilsonSue; CapizziAixa; GoodnerAngela; LykinsDave; BrockMaryJo; OchsLeo; KlatzkowJeff; ryovanovich@cyklawfirm.com; Dianna Quintanilla; bstock@stockdevelopment.com Subject:ONE WAY COMMUNICATION - ONE NAPLES MEMO FROM COMMISSIONER TAYLOR Date:Thursday, February 25, 2021 1:29:26 PM Attachments:one naples memo to commission.pdf Importance:High ONE WAY COMMUNICATION Attached please see memo from Commissioner Taylor. Sherry Greco Executive Coordinator to Commissioner Penny Taylor, District 4 Board of Collier County Commissioners 239-252-8604 Fax 239-252-6393 Sherry.Greco@colliercountyfl.gov Click here to sign up for our District 4 newsletter View current and previous District 4 newsletters Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. From:Jean Decker To:TaylorPenny; SolisAndy; LoCastroRick; McDanielBill; SaundersBurt Subject:OneNaples Residential Proposal Date:Sunday, February 21, 2021 1:34:23 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Collier County Commisioner, The proposed residential OneNAPLES tower in the Vanderbilt Beach Neighborhood is a travesty, and not in keeping with the Vanderbilt Beach and Pelican Bay neighborhoods, in spite of any alleged “gifting” to the county. The area should remain commercial, so nearby residents can walk and bike to shopping and beaches. A large new residential complex will create massive water runoff destroying the beauty of the Vanderbilt Beach area. I urge you to vote NO to OneNAPLES Plaza. Keep the land commercial. Thank you for your kind attention to this important matter. Jean Decker 837 Sailaway Lane #102 Naples From:Julie wyman To:SolisAndy; TaylorPenny; McDanielBill; SaundersBurt; ricklocastro@colliercountyfl.gov Subject:OneNaples would create a dangerous safety hazard issue Date:Wednesday, February 24, 2021 12:27:00 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Collier County Commissioners: If you, the Collier County Commissioners, approve an increase in 'density' as requested by Stock, OneNaples would add 344+/- permanent additional cars to Vanderbilt Beach Road PLUS the *cars and trucks of their friends, deliveries and services. These additional OneNaples vehicles would create a dangerous area traffic congestion problem and safety issue because their entrance would be across the street from the already established entrances to the Beach Garage and the Ritz-Carlton Hotel. (*therefore needs a separate multi level parking garage building in addition to the two levels of parking underneath his four residential buildings.) Below are assorted pictures of: # cars stacked up waiting to enter the Beach Garage # Fire Trucks and Emergency ambulances are common daily occurrences along Vanderbilt Beach Road and Gulf Shore Drive. Emergency vehicles responding to an emergency at the Vanderbilt public Beach are also common. # A fire truck negotiating through traffic. OneNaples, creating permanent traffic congestion of cars and trucks continually entering or exiting OneNaples' development could hinder fire trucks and ambulances responding to an emergency. This hindrance could cause someone to lose his or her life. The death of one person because an ambulance couldn't get to them in time-- is "one death too many." VOTE NO: to OneNaples VOTE TO KEEP COMMERCIAL ZONING From:Mark Fetzer To:McDanielBill Subject:OneNaples Date:Monday, February 22, 2021 2:19:20 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. I am opposed to the proposed development. Linda Fetzer Sent from my iPhone From:Larry & Anne Warshawski To:SolisAndy; TaylorPenny; LoCastroRick; McDanielBill; SaundersBurt Subject:OneNaples Date:Sunday, February 21, 2021 4:38:48 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Collier County Commissioners: We strongly object to the OneNaples proposal of changing the zoning of the Stock Development property from Commercial Zoning to Residential Zoning. Everything about that proposal is wrong and not in keeping with the carefully crafted long range plan for the Vanderbilt area. It greatly increases density It will overwhelm the public beach and park areas Traffic will be significantly increased Two of the buildings are almost four times the height of the present restrictions There is no green space surrounding the huge buildings The proposal doubles the amount of allowed residences There will be a loss of needed commercial space to serve the beach goers and surrounding residents The development will be out of context of the area The proposal even demands that Collier County give the developer the surrounding roads - absurd Please do the right thing - vote against this grotesque proposal which offers nothing to Collier County residents, overwhelms the surrounding and heavily used public beach and parks and which is at complete odds with a carefully planned neighborhood. It only gives a large and undeserved profit to a self centered developer. Thank you for your attention. Anne Wachsmuth Larry Warshawski Pelican Bay residents since 1989 From:Clark Readler To:McDanielBill Subject:OneNAPLES Date:Sunday, February 21, 2021 1:38:57 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel The proposed residential OneNAPLES tower in the Vanderbilt Beach Neighborhood is a travesty, and not in keeping with the Vanderbilt Beach and Pelican Bay neighborhoods, in spite of any alleged “gifting” to the county. The area should remain commercial, so nearby residents can walk and bike to shopping and beaches. A large new residential complex will create massive water runoff destroying the beauty of the Vanderbilt Beach area. I urge you to vote NO to OneNAPLES Plaza. Keep the land commercial. Thank you for your kind attention to this matter. Clark Readler, Pelican Bay From:tennisbums@aol.com To:McDanielBill Subject:Oppose Naples One Project Date:Sunday, February 28, 2021 5:59:08 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Bill I have been coming to Naples for the past 25 years and have been a year round resident in Pelican Bay for the past 11 years. I have loved everything that Naples has to offer including the small town casual atmosphere, the abundance of cultural activities, and the accessibility to the beach. I am concerned that we don't have the infrastructure to handle a mass development such as the one being proposed and the resulting traffic. PLEASE VOTE NO AND DO EVERYTHING YOU CAN TO AVOID TURNING NAPLES INTO PALM BEACH AND THE REST OF THE EAST COAST. Sincerely, Marion P Stein 8495 Abbington Circle Naples, Florida 34108 From:Johnstone, Robert E. To:McDanielBill Subject:oppose Stock development Date:Tuesday, February 23, 2021 2:09:21 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Hi, I just adding my opposition to the Stock development at Vanderbilt beach. It is too big, and needs to be cut way back. Bob Johnstone 717Hollybriar Lane Naples 34108 Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. From:Solotso To:McDanielBill Subject:Opposed to amending Growth Management Plan Date:Tuesday, February 16, 2021 9:47:00 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Commissioner McDaniel, Please do not be deceived by the intentionally deceptive visual presentation of the One Naples project circulated by the Stock corporation in the Naples Daily News and other outlets. Photoshopping an aerial view taken from hundreds or thousands of feet away in no way accurately represents the impacts of the development as proposed: shadowing, increased traffic density, canyonization, decreased setbacks, and violation of maximum building heights as set forth in the existing growth management plan. People reside and travel much closer to ground level in this area than the distorted aerial visuals promoted by Stock. Please do not be mislead. I ask that you vote against the amendments to the Growth Management Plan as proposed. The negative effects of this project on Vanderbilt Beach would be repeated across the rest of Collier County is the GMP is amended. Phillip Obermiller 10691 Gulf Shore Drive From:Michael Roe To:McDanielBill Subject:Opposed to One Naples Project Date:Wednesday, February 24, 2021 10:11:24 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel, We are opposed to Stock Development’s One Naples high-rise project because it fundamentally disregards the Collier County Growth Management Plan (GMP) and Land Development Code which residents and neighborhoods rely on to protect our quality of life and home investment. For this reason, and for the reasons outlined below, I am asking you, as a County Commissioner, to DENY the proposed GMP amendment. As a member of the local community, I fully understand that in doing so, the property will retain its current C-3 zoning, which will provide much needed walkable and bikeable neighborhood services. Stock’s proposed amendment doubles density in the coastal high hazard zone and paves the way for the rezoning request that doubles allowable building height, reduces setbacks by 70%, and cuts in half required open space. The project is not compatible with, or complementary to, adjacent comparable neighborhoods. One Naples will introduce a Collins Ave., Miami Beach-like development into the Naples Park, Gulf Shore Drive and Vanderbilt Beach Road communities. To avoid this outcome, the Commissioners must deny the GMP amendment. Acknowledging this extreme and radical departure from the type of development allowed under the GMP, approval of this project would provide a rationale for future too tall, too dense, irresponsible projects to continue to alter for the worse existing neighborhood character throughout Collier County. Should you see fit to approve the amendment notwithstanding the outcry from thousands of community residents, Collier planning staff, in considering the rezoning request, has recommended approval of the project but conditioned to make the buildings better fit the neighborhood. Staff proposes limiting the height of all four building to seventy-six feet. With a redesign option of the towers, setting back higher stories in a “wedding cake” fashion, staff would allow a height of one hundred and twenty-five feet (60% of the 208-ft request). Staff also recommends a front setback of 25-feet for all four buildings, rather than the 10-ft to 15-ft setback that the Stock plan is based on. Additionally, it recommends allowing a front setback of 15-feet for the two towers based upon a site plan redesign that provides retail services along Vanderbilt Beach Road and Gulf Shore Drive. Although the Naples Park Area Association, the Pelican Bay Property Owners Association, the Vanderbilt Beach Residents Association, Save Vanderbilt Beach, and other communities can support staff design conditions, given the transformative nature of the project even at the reduced scale, the better approach is to deny the project outright. Thank you for your time and consideration. Sincerely, Michael and Cheryl Roe 10851 Gulf Shore Dr, #1003 Naples, FL 34108 From:Edward Galante To:SolisAndy; TaylorPenny; McDanielBill; SaundersBurt; LoCastroRick Subject:Opposition to One Naples Development Date:Friday, February 26, 2021 10:32:07 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. As a resident of the Trieste at Bay Colony, I am writing you today to state my opposition to the One Naples Development as currently proposed. The Trieste has 105 condominium units and has been in existence since 2001. Our building is located in Bay Colony within Pelican Bay. We are at the far north of Bay Colony bordering Vanderbilt Beach Road just east of the Ritz Carlton. The Trieste has been cited by the developer of One Naples as a comparable for the One Naples project because of our 20-story height. The focus on building height totally ignores many other characteristics that make the comparison completely inappropriate. As stated in the October 30, 2020 letter you received from Pelican Bay Foundation, “Pelican Bay was created years ago as a comprehensive, well-planned, mixed-use Planned Unit Development, and it is vastly different from the neighborhoods to our south, north, and east.” Specifically, in the case of the Trieste, our parking garage is set back about 85 feet from Vanderbilt Beach Road and, sitting on a 4.73 acre lot, our density is about 22 units per acre. By comparison, Naples One proposes a setback of only 15 feet from Vanderbilt Beach Road and a density that is about 50% higher than that of the Trieste. Most important, the Trieste dimensions are similar to those of the rest of the buildings in Bay Colony. In contrast, One Naples dwarfs the surrounding buildings in their neighborhood. The project is simply not compatible or consistent with the neighborhood by any reasonable criteria. When you also factor in the likely further overcrowding of Vanderbilt Beach, the significant increase in traffic, the added safety and evacuation risks and other adverse factors, it is clear why several thousand Collier County residents fiercely oppose the project. Finally, while I am not “ anti development” the precedent of allowing this type of zoning change can not be overstated. First there is the question as to whether such a zoning change that benefits one developer so much at the expense of the rest of the neighborhood is even legal in Florida. Finally, if One Naples is approved, what can stop the potential flood of similar requests by developers to build similar overcrowded facilities to the north up the Collier County coastline? In summary, I respectfully request that you deny the One Naples proposal as submitted. Thank you for taking the time to consider my position. Sincerely, Edward Galante From:Kerridge, Joyce To:SolisAndy; TaylorPenny; McDanielBill; SaundersBurt; LoCastroRick Subject:Opposition to One Naples Project Date:Thursday, February 25, 2021 3:16:48 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Collier County Commissioners, I am a resident of the Trieste condominium located within the Bay Colony Community of Pelican Bay and have been so for eleven years now. Quite candidly, I am surprised that the Trieste was permitted to be built so close to Vanderbilt Beach Road when first constructed in the late 1990s. It does loom a big large over most of our neighbors. At least there is a large set back from the road, extensive landscaping and a light at the intersection of Vanderbilt Drive and Vanderbilt Beach Road. And it does NOT mandate a bottleneck or constricted point. Over these past eleven years of living at the Trieste I have witnessed a steady increase in the amount of pedestrian, bicycle and vehicular traffic along these two roads. Sidewalks are narrow where they are present, which is not everywhere, and lumpy in places. Many families seek free parking outside the of county parking garage and push their strollers, pull their wagons and coolers and hold the hands of their elderly and children while walking towards the beach. They walk for exercise, to visit a few small local restaurants, to visit the beach and to view sunsets en masse. I encourage you to come and take a look around any day of the week at any time to see for yourself. My primary concern and driver for my opposition to the development of One Naples as currently proposed is safety. This area is a narrow corridor with many people at all hours of the day. It is also a drag strip late at night for fast car racers. It is also in a coastal high hazard area which portends the possible overload of traffic during evacuations. The addition of 172 additional residential units as planned for One Naples will only exacerbate an already dangerous situation. No one is guaranteed a view of the Gulf. We all know this. The Stock development as proposed seeks exemptions from far too many current permitting and growth management plan provisions, issues obviously at hand when Stock purchased the parcels of land on which to build their One Naples dream. The issue is context. The drawing Stock Development is showing of One Naples in the newspapers looking from south to north from the Bay Colony Contessa condominium to the LaPlaya Hotel and Beach Club is so very deceiving. This speaks volumes to me. Deceptive behavior bodes poorly for a well-received development. Look around the immediate area where Stock wants to build their One Naples. It dwarfs the immediate community. And a 35-foot tall wall abutting Vanderbilt Beach Road and Gulf Shore Drive with only a 15-foot setback is insulting. Please understand that I would like to see these parcels of land developed in context with our neighbors in Naples Park, Gulf Shore Drive and the Regatta. I recognize that Stock builds a good product. BUT I don’t believe that their current proposal is the solution. Please deny their current petition and ask that they go back to the drawing boards. Surely there are many more creative and responsible options available to them to consider. Your vote on March 1 will set a very important precedent with regard to growth management. I look to you for leadership to keep Naples a beautiful option to so many waterfront Florida cities where massive concrete towers prevail. Naples deserves better. Thank you for your work on behalf of the citizens of Naples, Florida. I am grateful to count myself amongst them. Joyce Kerridge 240.463.3347 This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential, may be legally privileged, and are intended solely for the use of the named addressee. If you are not the named addressee, you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately if you have received this e-mail in error and delete this e-mail from your system. Please note that any views or opinions presented in this e-mail are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of the company. Finally, e-mail transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive late or incomplete, or contain viruses. The sender therefore does not accept liability for any errors or omissions in the contents of this message, which arise as a result of e-mail transmission. The recipient should check this e-mail and any attachments for the presence of viruses. The company accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this e-mail. From:Ann Darwish To:SaundersBurt; LoCastroRick; McDanielBill; GoodnerAngela Subject:Opposition To ONE NAPLES PROJECT Date:Saturday, February 27, 2021 3:13:36 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Please stop. Pine Ridge and US 41 are more like parking lots than roads. Same with Vanderbilt Rd ,Immokalee, and Goodlette. It is too much. Stop destroying our quality of life and the reason people move here! Dear Commissioners, First I want to thank you for your work on behalf of the citizens of Collier County. I want to voice my continued concern regarding the One Naples project. I feel it is not in line with other developments in the area. Pelican Bay development is not comparable to the Vanderbilt Beach community, as the setbacks were designed many years ago and it is one contiguous community as opposed to the beach area, which is a residential street. I do not wish to quash development, but I do want smart growth. One Naples is a bad precedent for our town. It will lead to many other developments of high density being approved, with will permanently alter the character of not just the immediate area around the project, but the whole community over time. I have always said I would never want to leave Naples when I retire, as my husband and I have built our life here in this community. However, I do not wish to live in a recreation of the towns on the east coast. People move to Naples to escape those! Why do we wish to destroy the very thing that makes people choose Naples as their home? It is not just the One Naples project by Stock that I oppose. As a Realtor in the area I have been a big supporter of Stock. For me this is nothing against just them. It is opposition to the continued waivers we hand out to developers - whether it be those building in the town or building in the expanding area out east. We can not continue this pace of growth and maintain the charming charter of our beloved Naples. Traffic gets worse each year, access to the beach by the public is made more difficult, and little by little our quality of life here slips away. I understand the tax revenue, employment, and economic stimulus concerns that are behind our need for growth. These are legitimate. However, I wish to caution against the outcome of continuing to give waivers to developers, be it for density, set backs, building height, or environmental in nature. It is changing our town and not for the better. If we continue to grow without a means to preserve what has made Naples such a special place to live, we will sow the seeds of our downfall. Those who have moved to Naples over the years have come for a reason. We have always been a special community. I oppose One Naples and the continued waivers of well established development guidelines for developers. We are not just "Saving Vanderbilt Beach" we are saving our town. I am including my previous letters that detail my reasons for opposition to One Naples for your review below. I implore you to consider your decision carefully in this matter. Respectfully, Ann Darwish REALTOR®, GRI, RSPS, SFR®, BPOR, ABR® Naples Resident since 2000 (239) 248-4965 anndarwish@me.com ............................................................................................................................................. LETTERS OF OPPOSITION TO ONE NAPLES - REASONS FOR OBJECTIONS: Subject: Opposition to One Naples - “Highest and best use” should not equate to maximum profits and high density Dear Commissioner, I am writing in opposition to One Naples. I believe Collier County is headed in the wrong direction. If we give waiver after waiver to developers, then we really have no standards! I oppose the One Naples development, even with Stock’s latest revisions and wanted to share are my thoughts. I strongly oppose Stock’s One Naples and continued exceptions for developers. Setbacks and other zoning regulations have been relaxed lately and I don’t like the results. This project is another on the list of “letting it slide” and lack of enforcement of current long time zoning regulations. For first time in 20 years of living here I am thinking I may not stay in Naples when I retire. Naples is trending in a BAD direction. I am not alone in that opinion. Just because current zoning allows it does not make it in keeping with what has been built in the area. In my mind, there is a distinction between a project that is allowed and one that would be appropriate. We can make choices that affect population density and the overall feel of our community. “Highest and best use” should not equate to maximum profits and high density for the rest of us who live in Naples. I support growth that is in keeping with our goal as a community. If growth means we become a Mini- Boca, is that what we want to be? If we resign ourselves to MONEY RULES then eventually the even “the rich” end up on the wrong side of the equation! One thing Naples teaches us: no matter how rich you are, there is always someone who has more than you. Commissioner, what happens when it comes to your neighborhood??? As the saying goes “be careful what you wish for.” Again, I strongly oppose One Naples and continued exceptions for developers. I will rely on the words of others who can express the details of the issue better than me. Please consider voting against continued waivers to our building and development codes. Be mindful of the precedent you set and the underlying message it sends to the rest of the community. Respectfully, Ann Darwish REALTOR®, GRI, RSPS, SFR®, BPOR, ABR® Naples resident since 2000 ........................................................................................................................................................ ......... Dear Commissioner, In the coming weeks, you will be given the opportunity to do a great service to the citizens of Collier County in general and to the Pelican Bay, Vanderbilt Beach and Naples Park communities specifically. You will have the opportunity of strongly and in no uncertain terms, recommending to the Board of County Commissioners that they deny the application of Stock Development for the approval of its One Naples project at the corner of Gulfshore Drive and Vanderbilt Beach Road as it is currently proposed. Why should you take this action? I know that the corner of Vanderbilt Beach Road and Gulfshore Drive is currently an eyesore, and I know that it needs to be redeveloped. Stock may be a good choice as the developer, but his current plan is a significant overreach. The current design which includes a 700-foot long 35-foot high wall 15-feet off his property line and a mere 35-feet from edge of the pavement along the length of Gulfshore and VBR, no matter what the planting in front of it, is not in the public interest. It will be a monstrosity for decades to come. And the towers, two 208-foot high structures as close as 25 feet to the property line will dominate the landscape, dwarfing the surrounding buildings. Save Vanderbilt Beach Inc has provided the County Planning Staff with its recommendations as to how One Naples might be redesigned to be neighborhood compatible. These recommendations address building height, density of residential units, setbacks, open space and more. Latitude is provided to Stock, giving the development flexibility vis-à-vis the existing C-3 zoning restrictions. I encourage you to request that the staff provide you with the Cover Letter and the Compatibility Standards document provided by Greg Stuart Associates, Planners to the County planning staff. Can I count on you to recommend denying his current design? Ask him to review the documents referred to above. You need not wait until the formal meeting. A call from you today indicating that you can’t vote for today’s design, but that you would fully support a project more sensitive to neighborhood wishes and compatibility would go a long way to bringing Stock back to the table It’s not too late. Stock is asking the county to donate nearly .8 acres to him in the form of the vacation of various roadways that run throughout his property. What is he giving in return? A project not in the public interest, adding density, traffic, safety concerns, and additional beach usage to an area already overburdened. One more thing. At the Neighborhood Information Meeting and elsewhere, Stock has always stated that if the zoning is not approved, Stock would market the property to a commercial developer who could build a Costco or a gas station there. That’s just not a real possibility. No such business would desire to be at that location. Stock recognizes that as well but thinks that a hotelier might have an interest. Remember, hotels are not approved in the existing C-3 zoning. To protect his investment, however, and to give himself more flexibility, Stock is asking that a hotel use be part of his new zoning. Not only that, but Stock has not qualified that request in any way. There have been no site plans showing a hotel. There are no elevation drawings of a hotel. There is no way to know if the ballroom will hold 200 or 700, or even if there will be one. There is no mention of restaurants serving large Sunday brunches. Nothing. Only that it can have up to 172 rooms. This is not acceptable. Do the right thing, and recommend that the County Commissioners deny the project in its current form. Protect the public interest. Thank you. Ann Darwish ................................................................................................................................................ My Additional Signed Letter and agreement with the opposition letter below. Dear Commssioner, As a Collier County Commissioner, I hope you are listening to the growing level of concern among North Naples residents opposed to the One Naples project, as proposed. What is the value of planning when you can arbitrarily change zoning and request variances that conflict with safety, rights and common sense? The hundreds of walkers from Naples Park, Beachwalk, Pavilion, etc. with chairs on their backs will wonder what happened, when people, not previously zoned, can simply cross the street to take their place at Vanderbilt Beach. One Naples will add more than 500 vehicles that will be forced to use local streets not built for traffic. Vanderbilt Beach Road east of 41 is being widened to six lanes and is being extended further east to the proposed 360,000 vehicle Rural Lands Service Area (RLSA) while west of 41 the two lanes can’t be widened. Please note that Emergency Services must pass through Vanderbilt Beach Road from Hammock Oak Drive. Furthermore, the county has built an expensive four-mile bike path, including bridges, north of Bluebill Avenue to Bonita Springs and you must use Vanderbilt Drive to access. Please consider these facts before deciding. Thank you. Ann Darwish From:mkmccully@gmail.com To:McDanielBill Subject:Opposition to One Naples Date:Monday, February 22, 2021 4:37:00 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Commissioner McDaniel, My wife Ellie and I are writing again in continued opposition to the One Naples project. We have been regular visitors to Beachwalk and Vanderbilt Beach since 1987, homeowners since 2010, and full-time residents since 2018. Apart from the distressing increase in traffic that will occur on Vanderbilt Beach Road, we are even more upset by the overall density issues and lack of setbacks the development proposes. The corner of Vanderbilt Beach Road and Gulf Shore Drive – and the beach – already exceed practical density, and that was with just a parking garage and public restroom. Adding five residential buildings and commercial space will ruin the neighborhood. Isn’t that the purpose for having the parcel not zoned for this kind of project? Please turn down One Naples as presented and require that Stock Development adhere to current zoning. Michael and Ellie McCully 525 Beachwalk Circle mkmccully@gmail.com 239-598-4910 From:Sarah Stanley To:McDanielBill Subject:Opposition to One Naples Date:Sunday, February 21, 2021 9:20:46 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: On March 1 you and your fellow Commissioners will be hearing Stock Development’s application for One Naples. I am writing you today to express my strong opposition to the development as Stock has proposed it. I know full well that this development is not in our District, and that you generally tend to vote with the Commissioner in whose District the project lies. But, in this case I ask you to act independently. Residents of Commissioner Solis’ District have overwhelmingly shown their opposition. I know that you are aware of that as I know that you have received hundreds of emails telling you so. I believe that Commissioner Solis intends to vote in support of the Stock amendment to the Growth Management Plan. His reason for doing so is flawed. He feels that the neighborhood is not capable of understanding the nuances of the matter before you, and that he, alone, know what is good for his District. When he tells people, “Be careful what you wish for.” he is saying that the residents of the affected neighborhood don’t know for what they are asking. I assure you that they do understand the ramifications of asking that Stock respect the existing C-3 zoning. One Naples is not simply a District 2 issue. It’s approval would send a message that for the Commissioners it’s “business as usual,” and the they have little concern for the “Miamification” of Collier County. It would represent the long-held pattern of the Board of County Commissioners supporting developers over neighborhoods. That must stop! I am asking you to vote to deny Stock’s proposed amendment to the Growth Management Plan. I cannot be more direct. You have for too long and for too often voted to allow developers to run slipshod over the wishes of your taxpaying constituents. I will be there on March 1st to hold your feet to the fire. Sarah Stanley __________________________ --------------------- From:Laura Simmelink To:McDanielBill Cc:FilsonSue Subject:Opposition to One Naples Date:Sunday, February 28, 2021 8:48:32 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: My name is Laura Simmelink, and I’m writing as a full-time resident of Collier County to express my opposition to One Naples, the Stock Development project on Vanderbilt Beach Drive. Basically, the project as currently proposed is not aligned with the character of our Collier County coastal neighborhoods or the preferences of our community. As you are aware, this will set a precedent for future development, and I believe it will irrevocably change the character of Collier County. Is the increased tax revenue from the proposed project enough of an advantage for Collier County Commissioners to approve the project as it stands? I cannot think of any other benefit to our community, other than that additional revenue. If there are other positive outcomes, I am unaware of them. Is it worth it to irrevocably change the character of our community — immediately and in the future? This project will increase density, reduce live-ability, reduce the beauty of our community, and reduce road safety for pedestrians, bikers, and drivers, among other negative outcomes. I support a project with: - significantly lower structure height - fewer residences - significantly greater setbacks - not gifting the developer the roads and other publicly-owned space As you make decisions about this project, please bear in mind that you represent the public. And that the way you vote will affect our community permanently. Generations from now, people who reside in and visit Collier County will experience the legacy of your vote on this project. Thank you for the time you dedicate to serving our community. Sincerely, Laura Simmelink From:craiggmatthews To:AndySolis@colliercountyfl.gov; TaylorPenny; RickLoCastro@colliercountyfl.gov; McDanielBill; BurtSaunders@colliercountyfl.gov Subject:Opposition to One Naples Date:Monday, January 11, 2021 3:33:31 PM Attachments:One Naples.docx EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Please see my attached email opposing the One Naples Project. Thank you. From:Schuman, William To:TaylorPenny; LoCastroRick; McDanielBill; SaundersBurt; SolisAndy Cc:Ken Melkus; Buzz Victor (buzz@unitedstor-all.com) Subject:Opposition to Proposed One Naples Development: It Constitutes Unlawful Spot Zoning Date:Friday, February 19, 2021 10:42:25 AM Attachments:10-12-2020 Letter to Collier County Members from Michael Austin.pdf EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioners Taylor, LoCastro, McDaniel, Saunders, and Solis: I write to emphasize a dispositive legal argument that prohibits Stock Development’s proposed One Naples project. Stock’s proposal constitutes unlawful Spot Zoning. As some of you are fellow litigators (I have been practicing for 42 years), I am hopeful that the controlling Florida case law and statutes described herein concerning Spot Zoning will resonate with you. Spot Zoning is the elephant in the room, as it condemns Stock’s proposed development. The Florida Supreme Court prohibited Spot Zoning in Parking Facilities v. City of Miami Beach, 88 So.2d 141 (1956). The Florida legislature codified this prohibition in Florida Statutes, Section 163.3194(3)(a). The prohibition is further codified in Policy 5.6 of the Future Land Use Element of the Collier County Growth Management Plan. Spot Zoning is the name given to the piecemeal rezoning of small parcels of land to a greater density, leading to disharmony with the surrounding area. Spot Zoning gives preferential treatment to one parcel at the expense of the zoning scheme as a whole. See Southwest Ranches Homeowners Assoc. v. Broward County, 502 So.2d 931, 935 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987). Unlawful Spot Zoning creates a small island of property with restrictions on its use different from that of surrounding properties, solely for the benefit of a particular property owner and to the detriment of the community or without a substantial public purpose. Allapattah Community Ass’n Inc. of Florida v. City of Miami, 379 So.2d 387 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); City Commissioner of the City of Miami v. Woodlawn Park Cemetery Co., 553 So.2d 1227, 1240 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989). The determination of Spot Zoning involves an examination of (1) the size of the spot; (2) the compatibility with the surrounding area; (3) the benefit to the owner and (4) the detriment to the immediate neighborhood. Parking facilities, Inc. v. City of Miami Beach, 88 So.2d 141 (Fla. 1956); Dade County v. Inversiones Rafamar S.A., 360 So.2d 1130 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978). In its proposal, Stock asks, solely in respect to its parcel, for (1) density that is double the density allowed by the current zoning law, (2) building heights that are double to triple the permissible building heights, (3) open space that is half of that required by the current zoning law, and (4) setbacks that are one-quarter of the setbacks currently required. Stock’s proposal is incompatible and inconsistent with, and in no way complementary to, the comprehensive plan, the current zoning rules, and the pertinent surrounding neighborhood. It seeks to create an impermissible “square peg” of land in an incompatible “round hole” community, to the great harm of, and with no benefit to, the entire community, for the sole benefit of the developer. Stock’s proposal is the poster child for unlawful Spot Zoning. Stock cannot properly rely on nearby properties in neighboring zones such as Bay Colony or Pelican Bay to create a purported compatibility that does not exist. Allowing comparisons with properties in other zones would impermissibly import a neighboring zone’s rules into a zone that has different zoning rules, just because it is nearby. Plainly, that would make Florida zoning laws meaningless. In Machado v. Musgrave, 519 So. 2d 629 (3d Dist. 1987), the court prohibited such a comparison, holding that “a comprehensive land plan legislatively sets a zoning norm for each zone,” not a single piece of property. One of the reasons for this rule, said the Machado court: “to avoid spot zoning.” Id. Collier County Land Development Code (“LDC”) Section 1.05.01F confirms this point. It provides: “Each zoning district has its own purpose and establishes its own density and intensity regulations.” Pelican Bay and Bay Colony provide particularly poor comparisons to the Vanderbilt Beach neighborhood in issue here, as they are vastly different communities with vastly different regulatory controls and restraints. Not surprisingly, the law does not allow Stock to avoid the Florida prohibition on Spot Zoning by separately seeking an amendment to the Growth Management Plan (“GMP”) that addresses only Stock’s parcel. As the Court in Machado explained, the prohibition on permitting a GMP amendment for a single piece of property “is the only way to (1) regulate and maintain land use by zones; (2) make individual zoning changes . . . conform to a legislated plan; and (3) avoid arbitrary spot zoning change that permits the use of individual parcels to depart from a plan.” Florida Statute 163.3194(1) confirms this point, providing that amending the GMP can only be done “as to the area of the entire zone,” not a single piece of property within the zone as sought by Stock. Indeed, the Court in Machado explained that under Section 163, local comprehensive plans “are not zoning laws.” They are “a limitation on a local governments . . . zoning powers.” Moreover, LDC Section 9.04.03 allows a zoning variance only if it is the minimum variance that will make possible the reasonable use of the land. Stock’s proposal plainly does not satisfy that requirement. Importantly, the stakes here are far bigger that the One Naples project currently in issue. If the Commissioners permit Stock’s current proposal to proceed, the Commissioners may render themselves powerless to stop the next project, and the next one after that, going north on Gulf Shore Drive. Currently, there is nothing in the neighborhood comparable to One Naples. So Spot Zoning flatly prohibits Stock’s proposal. But if the Commissioners allow One Naples to proceed, the next developer on Gulf Shore Drive will use One Naples as a comparable, and the Commissioners may have no principled basis for stopping that next proposal, and the next one, and the one after that. Right here, right now, the Commissioners will be condemning the Vanderbilt Beach and surrounding neighborhoods if they approve One Naples as currently proposed. Stock’s requested variances would benefit only Stock and would disregard entirely the rights of the residents of the area and the general public. Stock’s proposal would not create any resources useful to or needed by those who live in the area. To the contrary, the proposed development would do nothing more than accomplish an arbitrary, capricious, unlawful, and uncompensated wealth transfer of property from the thousands of residents who built and enjoyed their neighborhood over many decades and relied on the integrity of the current zoning rules, to a single developer. Indeed, in the face of the crescendo of community opposition to Stock’s proposal and the Planning Commission Staff’s recommendation against Stock’s proposal in its current form, the Collier County Planning Commissioners declined to approve Stock’s proposal. Nor can Stock plausibly claim that it would be unfair to deny its requested zoning variances. A developer who purchases land subject to existing zoning limitations accepts the risk that the limitations will remain in place. Stock knew when it purchased the land that its proposed project is prohibited by the zoning rules currently in force. The Planning Commission Staff Report dated September 24, 2020 agreed in 20 places that Stock’s proposal is incompatible and inconsistent with the Growth Management Plan. The Staff opined that Stock’s project could be approved only if its scope is dramatically reduced to comply with the current requirements for height, density and setbacks. Importantly, Florida Courts give no deference to the Commissioners’ judgment where Spot Zoning is in issue, because it is an issue of law. As explained in Machado, a court must review de novo, and with “strict scrutiny,” not deference, the Commissioners’ decision. A reviewing court would surely find Stock’s proposal to be prohibited, unlawful Spot Zoning. Attached hereto is a copy of an October 12, 2020 letter by my former law partner, Michael Austin, who represents a fellow member of the opposition to Stock’s proposed development, Ken Melkus. In his letter, Mr. Austin amplifies on the law of Spot Zoning and agrees that Stock’s proposed project constitutes unlawful Spot Zoning. As you consider Stock’s proposal, please be guided by your sacred duty to protect the residents of these communities. A tasteful, modest development of appropriate scale, consistent and compatible with current zoning requirements, can be an enhancement to the area. But allowing Stock to undertake a project with anything close to the currently proposed scope would impermissibly inflict substantial damage to the people that the Commissioners are duty bound to protect. Stock is asking the Commissioners to allow Stock to break the law. Under Florida law, Stock’s request must be rejected. Respectfully, William P. Schuman 8787 Bay Colony Drive Apt. 1804 Naples, Florida 34108 Cell: 847-951-2706 ******************************************************************************************************************* This message is a PRIVATE communication. This message and all attachments are a private communication sent by a law firm and may be confidential or protected by privilege. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the information contained in or attached to this message is strictly prohibited. Please notify the sender of the delivery error by replying to this message, and then delete it from your system. Our Privacy Policy explains how we may use your personal information or data and any personal information or data provided or made available to us. Thank you. ******************************************************************************************************************* Please visit http://www.mwe.com/ for more information about our Firm. From:Ted Collins To:McDanielBill Subject:Opposition to Stock Development Plan for One Naples! Date:Friday, February 26, 2021 11:48:38 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Bill, We are property owners at 476 Pine Avenue in the Vanderbilt Beach neighborhood and have read with horror the proposed plan for One Naples. Frankly, it is baffling how such a monstrous development proposal could have advanced this far. The massive size and height of the proposed buildings would not only make a congested area virtually impassible, but are completely out of character for the neighborhood! It is no consolation whatsoever that Stock's previous ridiculous plan has been scaled back to be slightly less ridiculous. We are not opposed to development that is consistent with the nature of the surrounding area and buildings, but strongly oppose granting approval for the project as outlined. Please let us know that you intend to ensure that this plan does not move ahead, and that you respect and value the beauty of this area of Naples as well as the rights and views of your constituents. Sincerely, Ted and Susan Collins From:Bill Oppenheimer To:McDanielBill; Rick LoCastro; TaylorPenny Subject:OVER-DEVELOPMENT in Collier County Date:Tuesday, February 9, 2021 8:52:13 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. My vote is NO! Regards, Bill Oppenheimer To: Collier County COA's From: www.Savevanderbiltbeach.com Please join us – WE NEED YOUR HELP! We are writing to share some information. Stock Development is proposing a huge high-rise project at the intersection of Vanderbilt Beach Road and Gulf Shore Drive called One Naples One Naples will double the intensity in this area which is in the Coastal High Hazard Zone and will pave the way for permission to double the allowable building height, reduce the setbacks by 70% and reduce the open space by 50%. Their two towers will be 186 feet tall and will be situated atop a 35- foot-tall podium that will be set a mere 15 feet from the sidewalk and will be 700 linear feet long. This development fundamentally disregards the current Zoning which should limit the intensity of this project and will begin the process of a “Miamification” of Vanderbilt Beach. This development is a radical departure from the type of development allowed in Collier County and its approval will set a dangerous precedent for the County. Developers will use this as a “foot in the door” to buy small parcels of land and erect high-rise buildings. We all have a voice in how we want to see the future of Collier County. It’s easy to allow the developers to build higher and higher and closer and closer to the street, resulting Miami/Dade. We would need wider streets to accommodate the increased traffic, longer waits at our restaurants, less availability at the beaches, more gridlock at the intersections, etc. All of Collier County will be impacted if the Commissioners grant permission for this development and we are appealing to all of our neighbors to contact your Commissioners and write to oppose this project specifically, but, more generally, the over- development of Collier County. One Naples needs the votes of 4 of the 5 Commissioners to be allowed to build. I know you’re not directly impacted by One Naples, but the Commissioners often vote for the developers over the wishes of the community. The City of Naples recently ousted their Mayor and a couple of Commissioners for not paying attention to the community. Our fate lies in the hands of our 5 County Commissioners some of which have a history of ignoring the will of the people. On March 1, 2021 these Commissioners will meet and vote on the One Naples project at Vanderbilt Beach. We need YOUR HELP to stop the runaway train of over- development in Collier County. If we don’t stop it now, it may be too late tomorrow. Please write to your Commissioners listed below and include your address. Add your voice to ours that over- development is not wanted in our community and we are willing to fight for this. Also go on www.savevanderbilt beach.com and read more about this development. Penny Taylor ...... Penny.Taylor@colliercountyfl.gov Burt Saunders...... Burt.Saunders@colliercountyfl.gov Bill McDaniel ...... Bill.McDaniel@colliercountyfl.gov Andy Solis ...... Andy.Solis@colliercountyfl.gov Rick LoCastro ...... Rick.LoCastro@colliercountyfl.gov Falling Waters Beach Resort | Website Mswebservices | 1045 Tarpon Cove Dr., Naples, FL 34110 Unsubscribe larryandbevfoley@gmail.com Update Profile | Customer Contact Data Notice Sent by tomcampbll@icloud.com powered by Try email marketing for free today! From:David Driapsa To:LoCastroRick; SolisAndy; SaundersBurt; TaylorPenny; McDanielBill Subject:Parking loss? One Naples Date:Monday, March 1, 2021 11:14:49 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear honorable County Commission: As a resident with interest in my neighborhood, and watching online the One Naples hearing today, it occurs that the proposal eliminates street parking and unofficial parking in common use on the property for decades without providing for replacement of that parking. Neither is the County parking garage adequate, as evidenced in the presentation illustrating cars backed up to enter the garage. In summary, a public parking garage must be included in the proposal. The long winded presentation does not adequately address the community needs of parking. Traffic lights move the public traffic more efficiently through the area but does not replace lost parking. David Driapsa agarden@naples.net (239) 591-2321 From:Paul O"Neil To:McDanielBill Subject:paul.oneil45@gmail.com Date:Monday, March 1, 2021 10:53:19 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: On March 1 you and your fellow Commissioners will be hearing Stock Development’s application for One Naples. I am writing you today to express my strong opposition to the development as Stock has proposed it. I know full well that this development is not in our District, and that you generally tend to vote with the Commissioner in whose District the project lies. But, in this case I ask you to act independently. Residents of Commissioner Solis’ District have overwhelmingly shown their opposition. I know that you are aware of that as I know that you have received hundreds of emails telling you so. I believe that Commissioner Solis intends to vote in support of the Stock amendment to the Growth Management Plan. His reason for doing so is flawed. He feels that the neighborhood is not capable of understanding the nuances of the matter before you, and that he, alone, know what is good for his District. When he tells people, “Be careful what you wish for.” he is saying that the residents of the affected neighborhood don’t know for what they are asking. I assure you that they do understand the ramifications of asking that Stock respect the existing C-3 zoning. One Naples is not simply a District 2 issue. It’s approval would send a message that for the Commissioners it’s “business as usual,” and the they have little concern for the “Miamification” of Collier County. It would represent the long-held pattern of the Board of County Commissioners supporting developers over neighborhoods. That must stop! I am asking you to vote to deny Stock’s proposed amendment to the Growth Management Plan. I cannot be more direct. You have for too long and for too often voted to allow developers to run slipshod over the wishes of your taxpaying constituents. I will be there on March 1st to hold your feet to the fire. Paul O'Neil __________________________ --------------------- From:Kristin Harvey To:McDanielBill Subject:Pelican Bay Date:Monday, February 15, 2021 2:58:10 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: On March 1 you and your fellow Commissioners will be hearing Stock Development’s application for One Naples. I am writing you today to express my strong opposition to the development as Stock has proposed it. I know full well that this development is not in our District, and that you generally tend to vote with the Commissioner in whose District the project lies. But, in this case I ask you to act independently. Residents of Commissioner Solis’ District have overwhelmingly shown their opposition. I know that you are aware of that as I know that you have received hundreds of emails telling you so. I believe that Commissioner Solis intends to vote in support of the Stock amendment to the Growth Management Plan. His reason for doing so is flawed. He feels that the neighborhood is not capable of understanding the nuances of the matter before you, and that he, alone, know what is good for his District. When he tells people, “Be careful what you wish for.” he is saying that the residents of the affected neighborhood don’t know for what they are asking. I assure you that they do understand the ramifications of asking that Stock respect the existing C-3 zoning. One Naples is not simply a District 2 issue. It’s approval would send a message that for the Commissioners it’s “business as usual,” and the they have little concern for the “Miamification” of Collier County. It would represent the long-held pattern of the Board of County Commissioners supporting developers over neighborhoods. That must stop! I am asking you to vote to deny Stock’s proposed amendment to the Growth Management Plan. I cannot be more direct. You have for too long and for too often voted to allow developers to run slipshod over the wishes of your taxpaying constituents. I will be there on March 1st to hold your feet to the fire. __________________________ --------------------- From:epircio@verizon.net To:LoCastroRick; TaylorPenny; SolisAndy; SaundersBurt; McDanielBill; SaboJames Subject:Picture 3 of 3 showing impeded line of sight up Southbay Dr. from Barefoot Pelican Date:Tuesday, January 5, 2021 3:39:00 PM Attachments:RE Picture 3 of 3 showing impeded line of sight up Southbay Dr. from Barefoot Pelican.msg EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioners: This is the last of the 3 photos I will be sending to you illustrating the impact to Barefoot Pelican owners caused by allowing One Naples to reduce their front yard setbacks from the 25 feet allowed to a mere 10 feet. The man is seated at approximately where he would be seated on his walkway. Note the wall- this illustrates the side of One Naples that has a front yard setback of only 10 feet versus the 28 foot setback of Barefoot Pelican. Note that the individual is in shade thus showing the effect of One Naples on his enjoyment of the walkway. Now picture that plywood wall towering 87 feet in the air. Will One Naples "lush landscaping" even mitigate this loss of line of sight? I think not, yet that is what the developer would have you believe. Please consider the neighbors when you are deliberating on this project. We have been at Barefoot Pelican for years and love it here. Do not let a "new boy on the block" come in and take away things that we hold most dear. Respectfully Submitted, Elizabeth (Betty) Pircio 271 Southbay Drive Naples, FL 781-690-0486 epircio@verizon.net -----Original Message----- From: Ralph Cowie <ralphcowie1@gmail.com> To: epircio@verizon.net Sent: Wed, Nov 4, 2020 4:24 pm From:Stromberg, Clifford D. To:SolisAndy; TaylorPenny; LoCastroRick; McDanielBill; SaundersBurt Subject:Please Do NOT Approve the Stock-- One Naples Project Date:Monday, March 1, 2021 8:51:03 AM Attachments:image002.png EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Commissioners: My wife and I live in Pelican Bay, right adjacent to Vanderbilt Beach Road. The proposed Stock project would really destroy our neighborhood. As you know, in sum: 1. Both during construction and during occupancy, it would massively increase the already significant traffic on Vanderbilt Beach Road. Sound and congestion will be a real hit to the quality of life. 2. The size and density is inconsistent with the area. It is more similar to Miami Beach. Most of us chose Naples precisely to void that ambiance. We have gotten our children and friends to look and buy here in Naples because it is unique. 3. Stock is doing the usual game of proposing a massive project and then trying to appear reasonable by “tweaking” it by “concessions.” But the basic concept remains unsound given he neighborhood. The basic concept of huge building, shopping, and marina will bring lots of people, noise, traffic and change the character of the area. Boating will become congested and noisier. 4. There will be and “spillover” effects of traffic on nearby streets and neighborhoods . People will cut through neighborhoods to try to avoid the congestion. 5. Have no illusion: you will be setting a precedent, which will be used to justify ever more enormous projects. 6. I am not anti-growth at all. But growth has to be smart growth. This will depress not enhance property values. Good projects can be built –on the right locations. I am not one to obsess over every little change. But this is a watershed, and I urge you not to approve the One Naples project. Thanks for listening. Clifford D. Stromberg If you would like to know more about how we are managing the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on our firm then take a look at our brief Q&A. If you would like to know more about how to handle the COVID-19 issues facing your business then take a look at our information hub. About Hogan Lovells Hogan Lovells is an international legal practice that includes Hogan Lovells US LLP and Hogan Lovells International LLP. For more information, see www.hoganlovells.com. CONFIDENTIALITY. This email and any attachments are confidential, except where the email states it can be disclosed; it may also be privileged. If received in error, please do not disclose the contents to anyone, but notify the sender by return email and delete this email (and any attachments) from your system. From:Sarah To:SolisAndy; TaylorPenny; LoCastroRick; McDanielBill; SaundersBurt Subject:Please reject One Naples Date:Monday, February 8, 2021 11:15:25 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear County Commissioners, I’m a resident of Collier County and live in Pelican Bay. I love Naples, and I love that it’s a charming coastal town that has not lost itself to overcrowding, more buildings/cement than natural beauty, and does not have a big city feel. In order to preserve the charm of this beautiful coastal town, I’m asking you to please vote NO to One Naples. This is our town and you have the power to keep Naples special. Please use your power to vote no. Please keep Naples unique and lovely. Thank you for your time, Sincerely, Sarah Sharma From:Diane Linnan To:McDanielBill Subject:PLEASE STOP NAPLES ONE Date:Sunday, February 21, 2021 8:36:40 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Sent from my iPad From:Ralph Verrastro To:TaylorPenny; SolisAndy; McDanielBill; FilsonSue; GrecoSherry; SaundersBurt; LoCastroRick Cc:Dottie Subject:Please Vote to Approve Zoning Change for One Naples Date:Sunday, February 21, 2021 10:44:43 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Collier County Commissioners: We are sending this email to formally request the Collier County Board of Commissioners to approve the proposed residential development at Vanderbilt Beach known as One Naples by Stock Development. We have been visiting Collier County every year since 1986 and have owned property since 2001. We are now and have been full time permanent residents in Collier County since 2005. We kindly request your support for this project for reasons that include: 1. The condition of the properties at this location has been an eyesore for too many years. This area of Collier County draws more residents and tourists due to its proximity to the beach so it should be the county's highest priority to improve it. 2. We have reviewed the renderings prepared of the proposed development and believe this amenity will increase the value of the neighboring residential buildings. 3. There are existing taller buildings within the immediate area so it will fit in nicely to its surroundings. 4. Traffic flow and pedestrian/bicycle safety will be enhanced (Ralph is a local civil engineer and therefore qualified to make this statement). 5. If the zoning change to allow this residential development is not approved, a commercial development will likely be constructed that will bring more traffic than a residential development. We believe this is not an appropriate location for more offices, restaurants, etc. 6. We believe Stock Development has done their homework and listened to the community as evidenced by the significant compromises it has made from its original proposals. 7. Our understanding of the concerns made by the vocal naysayer group is clear on only one point - NOT IN MY BACKYARD (NIMBY)! Thank you for your consideration of our request and thank you for your service to our community. Respectfully, Ralph and Dorothy L. Verrastro 15863 Secoya Reserve Circle Naples, FL 34110 Cell: 239-216-1370 From:regattascott@yahoo.com To:McDanielBill Subject:PLEASE VOTE YES FOR ONE NAPLES! Date:Tuesday, February 23, 2021 4:59:55 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Bill, PLEASE VOTE YES FOR ONE NAPLES! I have owned a condo at Regatta Condominiums for 20 years and have hoped for someone to come along and clean up the eyesore to the west of me. When it was announced that Stock had purchased the parcel, I was elated! I immediately requested a meeting to see what was planned. Brian Stock and his assistant Keith met with me and shared to overview. What a beautiful project. I then called a buddy who does virtual reality, to see the impact of my view. Virtually no change. I only have one kitchen window that faces west. Yes, I will see the building from that window, but no others. In fact, in all units in 400 flagship, only 2 stacks will have their kitchen window impacted slightly. The 02 and 03 stack. NO other units will even see One Naples from their Lanai. I have been harassed by fellow owners who live in buildings 2, 3, 4 and 5 to support their efforts to stop this development. They have treated to make life rough if I do not fall in line. What kind of world is this? This cancel culture must stop. These owners complain about everything. My only concern is traffic. Right now, it is very difficult in season to exit Regatta. Stock has offered to look into a Vanderbilt Drive exit for us. This would be a awesome solution. I met you at the Marbella Isles Byron event, thanks for all you do! Scott L. Klabunde CEO EVamped LLC 400 Flagship Drive #1103 Naples, FL 34110 Sent from Yahoo Mail. Get the app From:JASON TOWER on behalf of Jason Tower To:McDanielBill Subject:Please vote Yes on One Naples Project Date:Friday, February 26, 2021 5:38:37 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Good afternoon Commissioner McDaniel, I write this letter to you in support of the One Naples project proposed for the Vanderbilt Beach area. I believe it will be a positive addition to the area and will greatly improve land that has been in poor condition for many years. This would be the best option to keep traffic to a minimum in the area versus the congestion that would be caused by a commercial area or shopping center on that land. I believe in responsible growth for Collier County and I think this project is the right choice for area beautification and minimal community impacts. I understand that you will be voting on Monday to decide whether this project will be allowed to proceed as planned. I ask that you please take my commentary into consideration and vote Yes for One Naples. Thank you for your time! Sincerely, Jason Tower 7515 Campania Way Apt 114 Naples, FL 34104 From:James Hoppensteadt To:SolisAndy; SaundersBurt; TaylorPenny; McDanielBill; LoCastroRick Cc:OchsLeo; Jane Brown; "John Gandolfo"; Kim Rosenberg; Larry Baumann; Melanie Miller; "Mike Foley"; Mike Ruffolo; Suzanne Minadeo; Trent Waterhouse; RodriguezDan; KlatzkowJeff Subject:Proposed One Naples Project Date:Wednesday, February 10, 2021 7:06:44 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Commissioners, I originally sent this email on October 30, 2020. The County’s process, has been appropriately thorough, and understandably time-consuming. Between the end of October 2020 and now, the One Naples project has gone through the Planning Commission, multiple public meetings, plan modifications, and importantly, a new Commissioner has been elected to the Board of County Commissioners. There does seem to persist however, an ongoing commentary that compares the One Naples project to Pelican Bay. Therefore, the Foundation wishes to reiterate our position. Re: Proposed One Naples project Dear Commissioners: The Pelican Bay Foundation (Foundation) recognizes and values the importance of redevelopment to maintain property values and the quality of life in our community. We appreciate both the multiple and complex considerations of the criteria provided for in the land development code, the comprehensive plan amendments, the rezoning requests, etc., and, further, respect the concerns, objections, or support, of various community interest groups, individuals, or businesses. The Foundation expressly neither supports nor opposes the proposed One Naples project. In fact, we appreciate the open communication with which Stock Development has approached this proposed project. However, because properties within Pelican Bay have been cited as compatibility justifications for the One Naples project, the Foundation believes it has an obligation to clarify how Pelican Bay differs from the area to the north of Vanderbilt Drive since it is not part of Pelican Bay. Pelican Bay was created years ago as a comprehensive, well-planned, mixed-use Planned Unit Development, and it is vastly different from the neighborhoods to our south, north, and east. The planning, the PUD regulations and the applicable private declarations and covenants that govern Pelican Bay and have controlled its development include a myriad of factors, controls, constraints and planning techniques to regulate and manage development. The allowance of high-rise construction and mixed-use development are regulated and controlled by multiple different and important factors and controls. To compare only height in Pelican Bay to other areas, without also considering the overall planning and multiple other constraints that apply to Pelican Bay, seems like selective cherry picking. It is not an apt comparison. For example, the maximum height of principal structures within the Pelican Bay PUD is two hundred (200) feet above finished grade, provided that minimum yards must be maintained, from tract or development parcel lines, right-of-way lines and/or the edge of the gutter of a private road, of fifty (50) feet or one-half (1/2) the height of the structure, whichever is greater. Simply stated, Pelican Bay is a well-planned, well-organized and well-run large-scale development that should not be compared or used in a comparative analysis to justify any position (for or against) relative to development outside of its jurisdictional boundaries unless the entire Pelican Bay regulatory scheme of controls and constraints are similarly included. We wish you well in your deliberations of the value and appropriateness of the proposed One Naples project for the Vanderbilt Beach neighborhood. Sincerely, Jim Hoppensteadt President / COO Pelican Bay Foundation 6251 Pelican Bay Blvd. Naples, FL 34108 239-260-8460 direct 239-597-6927 fax ***** The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this message in error and that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this message including any attachments is strictly prohibited. If you received this in error, please contact the sender and delete the material from any computer. ***** From:KlatzkowJeff To:McDanielBill; LoCastroRick; SolisAndy; SaundersBurt Cc:TaylorPenny; OchsLeo; RodriguezDan Subject:Proposed Procedure for Naples One Date:Monday, February 22, 2021 10:16:48 AM Attachments:Procedural Memo One Naples Final 2-4-21.pdf Commissioners: Attached is a proposed procedure for the Naples One hearing on March 1st. The procedure is substantially similar to what was used in prior hearings of this nature, and was vetted with staff for their input. I spoke with the Chair this morning, who concurred with the proposed procedure. A copy of the procedure will be part of the backup to the item. Mr. Yovanovich has been provided a copy, and no objection was received. Jeffrey A. Klatzkow Collier County Attorney (239) 252-2614 Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. From:Olya Stawnychy To:McDanielBill Subject:Re One Naples application Date:Sunday, February 28, 2021 2:54:36 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. I oppose the One Naples application! Olga Stawnychy 11118 Gulf Shore Drive Unit802A Naples, Florida 34108 From:Sharon Swinton To:McDanielBill Subject:Re: Date:Monday, March 1, 2021 4:10:25 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. I live in Avalon at Pelican Bay. 8335 Excalibur Circle N2 Sent from my iPad On Mar 1, 2021, at 07:10, McDanielBill <Bill.McDaniel@colliercountyfl.gov> wrote: Thank you for your email regarding One Naples. I appreciate you contacting me to provide your input and express your thoughts. I carefully consider all information and comments when items are presented to the Board of County Commissioners. Again, thank you for giving me the opportunity to be of assistance to you. I value and appreciate the support as well as your participation in the government of our community. I am always available should you have any questions or concerns you want to discuss. In the future, so that we can determine the location of all concerned constituents, we are asking that all emails include your address and phone number. Bill W. L. McDaniel, Jr., Vice Chair Commissioner, District 5 3299 Tamiami Trail, East Naples, FL 34112 239-252-8605 WEB PAGE: <image001.png> -----Original Message----- From: Sharon Swinton <sharonswinton39@gmail.com> Sent: Sunday, February 28, 2021 10:30 PM To: McDanielBill <Bill.McDaniel@colliercountyfl.gov>; SaundersBurt <Burt.Saunders@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Vote NO to Naples One GMP Amendment. Some things are worth more than MONEY! Sent from my iPad Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. From:Ken Melkus To:Julie wyman Cc:SolisAndy; TaylorPenny; McDanielBill; SaundersBurt; ricklocastro@colliercountyfl.gov Subject:Re: A beautiful day at Vanderbilt Lagoon Date:Thursday, February 25, 2021 3:57:35 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Thx Julie! Sent from my iPad > On Feb 25, 2021, at 15:20, Julie wyman <julie4cats@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Good afternoon Collier County Commissioners, > I took a drive to see the Vanderbilt Lagoon -- what a perfect spot for a Collier County Park and Marina. Thank you for offering to answer any questions -- I do have a couple relating to the pictures below: the breeze off the Lagoon was delicious-- it was so relaxing to be next to this beautiful Lagoon, a Coastal Treasure that should be a Collier County Park! I saw fish jumping! What I did not see were huge tall condo buildings anywhere on this Lagoon such as Stock wants to build. I saw a parking lot sign for Buzz's Restaurant .. is that owned by the restaurant or did Stock buy it? I saw a Beach Parking sign .. pay at the beach store ... did Stock buy that parking area? I saw a sign for Finch's South Bay Marina .. did Stock buy that Marina? I didn't take a picture because there were cars in the way but I saw a sign for Permit Parking .. is that a Collier County lot and, if so, is that part of the .79 county property Stock needs to build OneNaples? > Thank you very much -- your input and time is most appreciated! > Julie Wyman > From:Gary Scottoline To:McDanielBill Subject:Re: Canned response Date:Monday, February 22, 2021 2:14:41 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. I have to say, I’m not encouraged by your automated email responses. Hopefully you understand how many are upset by this project! On Feb 22, 2021, at 12:46 PM, McDanielBill <Bill.McDaniel@colliercountyfl.gov> wrote: Thank you for your email regarding One Naples. I appreciate you contacting me to provide your input and express your thoughts. I carefully consider all information and comments when items are presented to the Board of County Commissioners. Again, thank you for giving me the opportunity to be of assistance to you. I value and appreciate the support as well as your participation in the government of our community. I am always available should you have any questions or concerns you want to discuss. In the future, so that we can determine the location of all concerned constituents, we are asking that all emails include your address and phone number. Bill W. L. McDaniel, Jr. Commissioner, District 5 3299 Tamiami Trail, East Naples, FL 34112 239-252-8605 WEB PAGE: <image001.png> From: Gary Scottoline <gscottolin@aol.com> Sent: Monday, February 22, 2021 11:06 AM To: McDanielBill <Bill.McDaniel@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: Re: One Naples Project EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. In the future, so that we can determine the location of all concerned constituents, we are asking that all emails include your address and phone number. As requested FYI Gary Scottoline 800 Breakaway Lane Unit 104 Pelican Bay-Breakwater Naples, Fla 610-952-1186 On Feb 22, 2021, at 10:12 AM, McDanielBill <Bill.McDaniel@colliercountyfl.gov> wrote: Thank you for your email regarding One Naples. I appreciate you contacting me to provide your input and express your thoughts. I carefully consider all information and comments when items are presented to the Board of County Commissioners. Again, thank you for giving me the opportunity to be of assistance to you. I value and appreciate the support as well as your participation in the government of our community. I am always available should you have any questions or concerns you want to discuss. In the future, so that we can determine the location of all concerned constituents, we are asking that all emails include your address and phone number. Bill W. L. McDaniel, Jr., Vice Chair Commissioner, District 5 3299 Tamiami Trail, East Naples, FL 34112 239-252-8605 WEB PAGE: <image001.png> -----Original Message----- From: Gary Scottoline <gscottolin@aol.com> Sent: Monday, February 22, 2021 10:05 AM To: McDanielBill <Bill.McDaniel@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: One Naples Project EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. As a Pelican Bay homeowner, I am extremely concerned with what the One Naples project will do to the Vanderbilt beach area. It will overcrowd that vital county resource that so many need to have access to a beach for their families. It will also impact traffic and quality of life along Vanderbilt Beach Road, and also impact our Pelican Bay lifestyle, since folks will more than likely cut through Pelican Bay to avoid the Vanderbilt Rd., and Rt 41 intersection if the are traveling south. I must ask you to give your upmost consideration to stopping this disruptive project, no matter the money involved, to avoid making our corner of the world into another overbuilt Florida beach area. Remember, once the precedent is set the development floodgates will open! It is time to make a stand, and maintain what we have and not destroy it. Gary Scottoline 800 Breakaway Lane Naples Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. From:Julie wyman To:McDanielBill Subject:Re: It takes a County to keep its communities safe from over-development Date:Friday, February 19, 2021 3:36:34 PM Attachments:image001.png EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: Thank you very much for responding to my (long) email and for your careful consideration of the points I make in my letter. My address is: 8787 Bay Colony Drive, Apt. 1705, Naples Cell phone: 941-927-5580 (moved here from Sarasota in 2016 and live here year-round!) Please let me know if I can provide you with any other information or pictures from my 'Bird's Eye' view of the piece of property in question -- also of Pelican Bay so you can see the difference for yourself! Have a great weekend, Julie Wyman On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 3:16 PM McDanielBill <Bill.McDaniel@colliercountyfl.gov> wrote: Thank you for your email regarding One Naples. I appreciate you contacting me to provide your input and express your thoughts. I carefully consider all information and comments when items are presented to the Board of County Commissioners. Again, thank you for giving me the opportunity to be of assistance to you. I value and appreciate the support as well as your participation in the government of our community. I am always available should you have any questions or concerns you want to discuss. In the future, so that we can determine the location of all concerned constituents, we are asking that all emails include your address and phone number. Bill W. L. McDaniel, Jr. Commissioner, District 5 3299 Tamiami Trail, East Naples, FL 34112 239-252-8605 WEB PAGE: From: Julie wyman <julie4cats@gmail.com> Sent: Friday, February 19, 2021 1:26 PM To: McDanielBill <Bill.McDaniel@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: It takes a County to keep its communities safe from over-development EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel, (Yes long, but please read) Brian Stock of Stock Development continues to compare his OneNaples to Pelican Bay -- across the street -- but a world apart. These two developments just are not comparable. Here's why: 1. The Pelican Bay towers, specifically the Ritz, Remington and Trieste, across the street from OneNaples are surrounded by acres and acres of 'green space,' lakes, marshes, flowers and trees. OneNaples towers will be surrounded by concrete and asphalt. 2. All Pelican Bay towers have private beach access. OneNaples towers own no private beach access and the 344 +/- owners/renters together with their many guests will overwhelm Vanderbilt Beach "The People's Beach" 3. OneNaples is a total of 5.4 acres... of course that is only if Collier County 'gifts' Stock with .79 acres of taxpayers' roads. (Land valued at $3.4M) 4. Pelican Bay is a total of 2,100 acres; 530 acres of which are designated 'green space' and 77 acres of which were given to Collier County: 1.69 acres for the Vanderbilt Beach Branch Library; 3.63 acres for the North Collier Fire rescue, Sheriff's Station and Emergency Services; 15 acres to create Pelican Bay Community Public Park with tennis courts, large open field, etc.; 40 acres of Clam Pass Beachfront which is now a Collier County Beach Park; 12 acres for Collier County Utilities AND ... at the end of Vanderbilt Beach Road -- 5 acres of a beautiful stretch of beachfront property which is now the famous "Vanderbilt Beach" which includes land for the parking garage! That's right, Pelican Bay owned this land and it is now "The People's Beach" and one of the most popular beach accesses in Collier County! Recently along a stretch of Vanderbilt Beach Road, Collier County, using tax dollars, extended existing bike lanes further Westward heading to Vanderbilt Beach! 5. Instead of Stock 'gifting' anything to Collier County, Stock wants 'gifts' from Collier County such as: (a) Stock requests a change from Commercial Zoning to Residential Zoning -- this would have a huge negative impact on the quality of life of the neighborhood and of Collier County. When Stock purchased this property he knew it was zoned Commercial. (b) Stock requests a 'gift' from Collier County of .79 acres of taxpayers' roads (approximately $4.3M in land value) so he has one whole piece of property for his two massive 184' skyscrapers. When Stock purchased this property he knew he was purchasing 'pieces' of property divided by County roads. (c) Stock requests 'gifts' of increased building heights, greater density, reduced easements and minimal setbacks so his two 184' towers can be built as close to the intersection of Vanderbilt Beach Road and Gulf Shore Blvd. as he can get so as not to spare any speck of land. BTW the tower directly across the street from OneNaples is 127' high and also in the Vanderbilt Beach neighborhood. 6. The proposed residential OneNaples in the Vanderbilt Beach neighborhood is neither a good 'fit' nor consistent with the Growth Management Plan. The Vanderbilt Beach neighborhood is not comparable to the Pelican Bay neighborhood. The OneNaples property should remain commercial and provide nearby shops, restaurants and services for the neighborhood as well as for the enjoyment of all Collier County residents and visitors .. as it was intended.... that is why it is zoned COMMERCIAL. Nearby residents and hotel guests could walk or bike to the restaurants and shops. It would be another lovely Naples waterfront 'destination' ... with the public Vanderbilt Beach and public access to Vanderbilt Lagoon and a marina -- all in one area. Without excessive pollution runoff of an outrageously massive residential development, a safer environment will be provided for the marine wildlife of Vanderbilt Lagoon. No matter what, Stock should be required to 'gift' Collier County with the water frontage for a ***"Collier County Vanderbilt Lagoon Park." Collier County residents and visitors would have a 'waterfront' access experience at the Vanderbilt Lagoon -- instead of blocking off this "Florida Coastal Treasure" forever for the private use of a privileged few. Children could have all kinds of unique water experiences, water enjoyment, learn boating safety and get up close and learn to respect Florida waters and marine life.... it all awaits at the Vanderbilt Lagoon. Please think about the future of all Collier County and consider carefully the long-term negative ramifications of this massive OneNaples residential project and over-development not just in North Naples, but spewing out into other County districts as well. Please do the right thing for all citizens of Collier County .. VOTE ...NO TO OneNAPLES -- KEEP THE LAND COMMERCIAL Thank you very much, Julie Wyman North Naples ***The Master Plan of the Collier County Parks & Recreation is to provide the County's residents with unique recreation experiences, enhance the quality of our natural environment and attract visitors to the County, thereby contributing to local tourism and economic development. A Mission of Collier County is to optimize its existing parks and recreation assets and set priorities to acquire future park assets to ensure that Collier County's legacy of parks and open spaces will continue well into the future. Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. From:Timothy Nash To:McDanielBill Subject:Re: Lunch Date:Friday, February 26, 2021 10:44:08 AM Attachments:Outlook-tgxe0lra.png EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Sue, I just spoke with Bill about setting up a lunch introduction. Would Bill be available for a lunch meeting on either March 11 or 12? You can pick the location if he has a favorite spot. Sincerely, TIMOTHY S. NASH PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER NASH INNOVATIONS, LLC. 239.682.4811 TIM@NASHINNOVATIONSLLC.COM www.nashinnovationsllc.com www.tanktire.com CONFIDENTIAL From: McDanielBill <Bill.McDaniel@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Wednesday, August 19, 2020 8:05 AM To: Timothy Nash <tim@nashinnovationsllc.com> Subject: RE: Lunch Hi Timothy, how about breakfast at 8:00 am on Friday, August 28th? I normally schedule at Alda’s Diner which is in the Winn Dixie Shopping Center located at Collier Boulevard and Vanderbilt Beach Road (south end of shopping center). Please let me know if that is acceptable. Sue From: Timothy Nash <tim@nashinnovationsllc.com> Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2020 9:01 AM To: McDanielBill <Bill.McDaniel@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: Re: Lunch EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Ok thanks Sue. TIMOTHY S. NASH PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER NASH INNOVATIONS, LLC. 239.682.4811 TIM@NASHINNOVATIONSLLC.COM www.nashinnovationsllc.com www.tanktire.com On Aug 18, 2020, at 8:56 AM, McDanielBill <Bill.McDaniel@colliercountyfl.gov> wrote: Hi, working polls today. Will get back with you tomorrow Sue Sent from my iPhone On Aug 17, 2020, at 6:33 PM, Timothy Nash <tim@nashinnovationsllc.com> wrote: EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Sue, All three of those proposed dates and options works for us. Let me know what Bill would prefer and we’ll go with that one. Sincerely, TIMOTHY S. NASH PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER NASH INNOVATIONS, LLC. 239.682.4811<tel:239.682.4811> TIM@NASHINNOVATIONSLLC.COM<mailto:TIM@NASHINNOVATIONSLLC.COM> www.nashinnovationsllc.com<http://www.nashinnovationsllc.com/> www.tanktire.com<http://www.tanktire.com/> On Aug 17, 2020, at 5:39 PM, McDanielBill <Bill.McDaniel@colliercountyfl.gov> wrote: Hi Tim, It looks like the 27th won’t work. His meeting will go into lunch. I have listed some dates and times below that I can schedule: Friday, August 28th – breakfast Thursday, Sept. 10th – breakfast or lunch Tuesday, Sept. 15th – breakfast or lunch Our regular meetings will start soon and he is booked up, sorry. Let me know if one of these dates will work. Sue From: Timothy Nash <tim@nashinnovationsllc.com> Sent: Monday, August 17, 2020 4:03 PM To: McDanielBill <Bill.McDaniel@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: Re: Lunch EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Sounds great Sue. My cell number is 239-682-4811 and the gentleman I am bringing with is named Todd Weist. Sincerely, TIMOTHY S. NASH PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER NASH INNOVATIONS, LLC. 239.682.4811<tel:239.682.4811> TIM@NASHINNOVATIONSLLC.COM<mailto:TIM@NASHINNOVATIONSLLC.COM> www.nashinnovationsllc.com<http://www.nashinnovationsllc.com/> www.tanktire.com<http://www.tanktire.com/> On Aug 17, 2020, at 3:59 PM, McDanielBill <Bill.McDaniel@colliercountyfl.gov<mailto:Bill.McDaniel@colliercountyfl.gov>> wrote: Hi Tim, I’m checking with him about next Thursday. He has a meetings up there and may be able to meet you at McAlisters at noon. I’ll get back with you as soon as I hear. I’ll need the name of the gentlemen you are bringing and your phone number. Sue From: Timothy Nash <tim@nashinnovationsllc.com<mailto:tim@nashinnovationsllc.com>> Sent: Monday, August 17, 2020 3:33 PM To: McDanielBill <Bill.McDaniel@colliercountyfl.gov<mailto:Bill.McDaniel@colliercountyfl.gov>> Subject: Lunch EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Sue, Could you let me know what days next week Bill would have time for a lunch? He mentioned to just email him. I would propose somewhere in North Naples if possible. I will be bringing along a gentleman with me which I have already spoken with Bill about. Sincerely, TIMOTHY S. NASH PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER NASH INNOVATIONS, LLC. 239.682.4811<tel:239.682.4811> TIM@NASHINNOVATIONSLLC.COM<mailto:TIM@NASHINNOVATIONSLLC.COM> www.nashinnovationsllc.com<http://www.nashinnovationsllc.com/> www.tanktire.com<http://www.tanktire.com/> ________________________________ Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. From:M A von Fricken MD To:McDanielBill Subject:Re: Naples 1 Date:Tuesday, February 16, 2021 12:08:34 PM Attachments:image001.png EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Thank you for your response MANFRED A. VON FRICKEN, M.D. rgwmav@aol.com c. 703.929.0089 -----Original Message----- From: McDanielBill <Bill.McDaniel@colliercountyfl.gov> To: M A von Fricken MD <rgwmav@aol.com> Sent: Tue, Feb 16, 2021 11:24 am Subject: RE: Naples 1 Thank you for your email regarding Naples 1. I appreciate you contacting me to provide your input and express your thoughts. I carefully consider all information and comments when items are presented to the Board of County Commissioners. Again, thank you for giving me the opportunity to be of assistance to you. I value and appreciate the support as well as your participation in the government of our community. I am always available should you have any questions or concerns you want to discuss. In the future, so that we can determine the location of all concerned constituents, we are asking that all emails include your address and phone number. Bill W. L. McDaniel, Jr. Commissioner, District 5 3299 Tamiami Trail, East Naples, FL 34112 239-252-8605 WEB PAGE: From: M A von Fricken MD <rgwmav@aol.com> Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2021 11:03 AM To: McDanielBill <Bill.McDaniel@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: Naples 1 EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel, As residents and registered voters of Collier County, my wife and I are writing to let you know of our opposition to the current plans for Naples 1, as we understand them to be, based on presentations by the Pelican Bay Property Owners Association. I am reluctant to be a NIMBY type of person, but feel that development in SW Florida is in danger of achieving threshold proportions for the very things we don't want to see happen; to turn our beautiful part of the world into the high density canyons of the East Coast. We also understand the more nuanced approach that ought to be taken for this parcel of land and will continue to follow the decisions made by the commissioners regarding planning, zoning changes and the land use propositions for Naples 1. Respectfully, Manfred and Linda von Fricken 5895 Chanteclair Dr 111 Naples, FL 34108 MANFRED A. VON FRICKEN, M.D. rgwmav@aol.com c. 703.929.0089 Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. From:nancydee1@comcast.net To:McDanielBill Subject:RE: Naples One Commissioner William L. McDaniel Jr Date:Tuesday, February 23, 2021 11:46:58 AM Attachments:image001.png EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Nancy McPeak 9566 Gulf Shore Dr. PH4 Naples, FL 34108 From: McDanielBill <Bill.McDaniel@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2021 11:24 AM To: nancydee1@comcast.net Subject: RE: Naples One Commissioner William L. McDaniel Jr Thank you for your email regarding One Naples. I appreciate you contacting me to provide your input and express your thoughts. I carefully consider all information and comments when items are presented to the Board of County Commissioners. Again, thank you for giving me the opportunity to be of assistance to you. I value and appreciate the support as well as your participation in the government of our community. I am always available should you have any questions or concerns you want to discuss. In the future, so that we can determine the location of all concerned constituents, we are asking that all emails include your address and phone number. Bill W. L. McDaniel, Jr. Commissioner, District 5 3299 Tamiami Trail, East Naples, FL 34112 239-252-8605 WEB PAGE: From: nancydee1@comcast.net <nancydee1@comcast.net> Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2021 10:51 AM To: McDanielBill <Bill.McDaniel@colliercountyfl.gov> Cc: 'ICE McPeak, Dailey' <dailey1@comcast.net> Subject: Naples One Commissioner William L. McDaniel Jr EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. From:marni chur To:McDanielBill Subject:Re: Naples One Date:Sunday, February 28, 2021 4:20:39 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Thank you, enjoy the rest of the weekend. On Feb 28, 2021, at 4:04 PM, McDanielBill <Bill.McDaniel@colliercountyfl.gov> wrote: Thank you for your email regarding One Naples. I appreciate you contacting me to provide your input and express your thoughts. I carefully consider all information and comments when items are presented to the Board of County Commissioners. Again, thank you for giving me the opportunity to be of assistance to you. I value and appreciate the support as well as your participation in the government of our community. I am always available should you have any questions or concerns you want to discuss. Bill W. L. McDaniel, Jr. Commissioner, District 5 3299 Tamiami Trail, East Naples, FL 34112 239-252-8605 WEB PAGE: <image001.png> From: marni chur <marnichur@yahoo.com> Sent: Sunday, February 28, 2021 3:07 PM To: McDanielBill <Bill.McDaniel@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: Naples One EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Mr. McDaniel. We have been Naples residents for 20 years and urge you to please "Deny" the One Naples GMP amendment. It will be a dangerous precedent to set - let’s keep Naples the town that we know and love and not let "big checkbooks" muscle their way to self-serving change!! Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Marni Chur 700 Myrtle Rd Naples FL 34108 Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. From:Sheila Varnum To:McDanielBill Subject:Re: One Naples Date:Tuesday, February 9, 2021 10:22:55 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Hi Commissioner: Thanks our or your help on this issue. And, as requested: Sheila Varnum 716 Turkey Oak Lane Naples, Fl. 34108 239-596-1648 On Feb 9, 2021, at 9:43 AM, McDanielBill <Bill.McDaniel@colliercountyfl.gov> wrote: Ms. Varnum, Thank you for your email regarding One Naples. I appreciate you contacting me to provide your input and express your thoughts. I carefully consider all information and comments when items are presented to the Board of County Commissioners. Again, thank you for giving me the opportunity to be of assistance to you. I value and appreciate the support as well as your participation in the government of our community. I am always available should you have any questions or concerns you want to discuss. In the future, so that we can determine the location of all concerned constituents, we are asking that all emails include your address and phone number. Bill W. L. McDaniel, Jr., Vice Chair Commissioner, District 5 3299 Tamiami Trail, East Naples, FL 34112 239-252-8605 WEB PAGE: <image001.png> -----Original Message----- From: Sheila Varnum <Sheila@varnum.com> Sent: Tuesday, February 9, 2021 8:58 AM To: McDanielBill <Bill.McDaniel@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: One Naples EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner: Please do not let Stock be rewarded for this egregious behavior of resorting to bribery to gain acceptance for this project. The reason they do too have widespread acceptance is that it is too big, and does not fit with surroundings. It will be a massively big project, in too small an area, and completely overwhelm the whole area with traffic, cars, and buildings that are terribly out of scale. Please hold them accountable to abide by the rules now in place. Thank you, Sheila Varnum Pelican Bay resident Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. From:Nancy Schahctman To:McDanielBill Subject:Re: One Naples Affects Date:Wednesday, February 17, 2021 10:39:44 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. I’m sorry: Nancy Schachtman—612-850-7167 7575 Pelican Bay Blvd. #206, Naples, Fl 34108 > On Feb 17, 2021, at 8:32 AM, McDanielBill <Bill.McDaniel@colliercountyfl.gov> wrote: > > Thank you for your email regarding One Naples. I appreciate you contacting me to provide your input and express your thoughts. I carefully consider all information and comments when items are presented to the Board of County Commissioners. > > Again, thank you for giving me the opportunity to be of assistance to you. I value and appreciate the support as well as your participation in the government of our community. > > I am always available should you have any questions or concerns you want to discuss. > > In the future, so that we can determine the location of all concerned constituents, we are asking that all emails include your address and phone number. > > Bill > W. L. McDaniel, Jr. > Commissioner, District 5 > 3299 Tamiami Trail, East > Naples, FL 34112 > 239-252-8605 > WEB PAGE: <http://www.colliergov.net/CommissionerMcDaniel> > > ________________________________ > > Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. > <image001.png> From:McDanielBill To:Mark Sjolund Subject:RE: One Naples Application Date:Monday, March 1, 2021 10:28:00 AM Attachments:image001.png Mr. Sjolund, Thank you for your email regarding One Naples. I appreciate you contacting me to provide your input and express your thoughts. I carefully consider all information and comments when items are presented to the Board of County Commissioners. Again, thank you for giving me the opportunity to be of assistance to you. I value and appreciate the support as well as your participation in the government of our community. I am always available should you have any questions or concerns you want to discuss. Bill W. L. McDaniel, Jr. Commissioner, District 5 3299 Tamiami Trail, East Naples, FL 34112 239-252-8605 WEB PAGE: From: Mark Sjolund <sjolund.pga@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, March 1, 2021 8:59 AM To: McDanielBill <Bill.McDaniel@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: One Naples Application EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Bill, You said to contact you if I ever needed anything... Please vote no, as I oppose the One Naples application. It simply is out of context for the neighborhood, and will negatively impact the entire Vanderbilt Beach area. Best regards, Mark A. Sjolund, PGA 2728 Tiburon Blvd E #306 Naples, FL 34109 414-331-6301 sjolund.pga@gmail.com From:Mark Sjolund To:McDanielBill Subject:Re: One Naples Application Date:Monday, March 1, 2021 10:39:03 AM Attachments:image001.png EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Bill, Thank you for the response and consideration. Best regards, Mark A. Sjolund, PGA 414-331-6301 On Mon, Mar 1, 2021, 10:28 AM McDanielBill <Bill.McDaniel@colliercountyfl.gov> wrote: Mr. Sjolund, Thank you for your email regarding One Naples. I appreciate you contacting me to provide your input and express your thoughts. I carefully consider all information and comments when items are presented to the Board of County Commissioners. Again, thank you for giving me the opportunity to be of assistance to you. I value and appreciate the support as well as your participation in the government of our community. I am always available should you have any questions or concerns you want to discuss. Bill W. L. McDaniel, Jr. Commissioner, District 5 3299 Tamiami Trail, East Naples, FL 34112 239-252-8605 WEB PAGE: From: Mark Sjolund <sjolund.pga@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, March 1, 2021 8:59 AM To: McDanielBill <Bill.McDaniel@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: One Naples Application EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Bill, You said to contact you if I ever needed anything... Please vote no, as I oppose the One Naples application. It simply is out of context for the neighborhood, and will negatively impact the entire Vanderbilt Beach area. Best regards, Mark A. Sjolund, PGA 2728 Tiburon Blvd E #306 Naples, FL 34109 414-331-6301 sjolund.pga@gmail.com Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. From:Dennis Donovan To:McDanielBill Subject:RE: One Naples Development Project Date:Sunday, February 28, 2021 9:21:14 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Bill - thanks for your quick response and engagement in the process. Regards, Dennis -----Original Message----- From: McDanielBill <Bill.McDaniel@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Saturday, February 27, 2021 4:36 PM To: Dmdonovan3@outlook.com Subject: RE: One Naples Development Project Thank you for your email regarding One Naples. I appreciate you contacting me to provide your input and express your thoughts. I carefully consider all information and comments when items are presented to the Board of County Commissioners. Again, thank you for giving me the opportunity to be of assistance to you. I value and appreciate the support as well as your participation in the government of our community. I am always available should you have any questions or concerns you want to discuss. Bill W. L. McDaniel, Jr. Commissioner, District 5 3299 Tamiami Trail, East Naples, FL 34112 239-252-8605 WEB PAGE: <http://www.colliergov.net/CommissionerMcDaniel> ________________________________ Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. From:Luis Salomon To:McDanielBill Subject:Re: One Naples Development Date:Sunday, February 28, 2021 5:19:26 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Thank you for considering my perspective. On Sun, Feb 28, 2021 at 3:48 PM McDanielBill <Bill.McDaniel@colliercountyfl.gov> wrote: Thank you for your email regarding One Naples. I appreciate you contacting me to provide your input and express your thoughts. I carefully consider all information and comments when items are presented to the Board of County Commissioners. Again, thank you for giving me the opportunity to be of assistance to you. I value and appreciate the support as well as your participation in the government of our community. I am always available should you have any questions or concerns you want to discuss. Bill W. L. McDaniel, Jr. Commissioner, District 5 3299 Tamiami Trail, East Naples, FL 34112 239-252-8605 WEB PAGE: <http://www.colliergov.net/CommissionerMcDaniel> ________________________________ Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. From:Layden, Laura To:LoCastroRick; McDanielBill; TaylorPenny; SaundersBurt; SolisAndy Subject:re: One Naples hearing Date:Monday, February 1, 2021 4:06:23 PM Attachments:Outlook-1475677247.png RE One Naples hearing.msg EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Good afternoon. It appears that the One Naples hearing will be held at commission chambers? Is that correct? What are your thoughts about it? It seems from the county manager's report that it will be the best venue, given COVID limitations and event conflicts. Thank you. Laura Layden Senior Business Reporter Mobile: 239.253.8953 Office: 239.263.4818 Laura.Layden@NaplesNews.com NaplesNews.com Support LOCAL JOURNALISM and become an all access-digital subscriber to naplesnews.com with this special offer: naplenews.com/subscribe Sign up for our Breaking Ground newsletter: https://www.naplesnews.com/featured-newsletter/breaking_ground/ From:paul bennett To:SolisAndy; TaylorPenny; LoCastroRick; McDanielBill; BurtSaunders@colliercountyfl.gov Subject:Re: One Naples Project Date:Wednesday, February 17, 2021 9:36:26 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Paul Bennett 1079 Tivoli Court Naples, FL 34104 Former address: 7134 Blue Juniper Court #102 Naples, FL 34109 > On Feb 16, 2021, at 12:25 PM, paul bennett <paul_bennett@hotmail.com> wrote: > > > Dear County Commissioners, > > I implore you not to support the zoning variance for the One Naples project. > > We do not want Naples to become the next Miami. Naples is unique like it is and we do not want to see it change. It is a desirable place to live because of the current zoning. Please do not attempt to change that. > > Sincerely, > Paul Bennett From:CRobertson To:McDanielBill Subject:Re: One Naples Project Date:Sunday, February 28, 2021 8:54:19 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Bill: Thank you for taking the time and for responding. We really appreciate it. Have a great day. Maurice & Cheryl Sent from my iPhone > On Feb 28, 2021, at 3:50 PM, McDanielBill <Bill.McDaniel@colliercountyfl.gov> wrote: > > > > Thank you for your email regarding One Naples. I appreciate you contacting me to provide your input and express your thoughts. I carefully consider all information and comments when items are presented to the Board of County Commissioners. > > Again, thank you for giving me the opportunity to be of assistance to you. I value and appreciate the support as well as your participation in the government of our community. > > I am always available should you have any questions or concerns you want to discuss. > > Bill > W. L. McDaniel, Jr. > Commissioner, District 5 > 3299 Tamiami Trail, East > Naples, FL 34112 > 239-252-8605 > WEB PAGE: <http://www.colliergov.net/CommissionerMcDaniel> > > > ________________________________ > > Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. From:Sara Ellerhorst To:McDanielBill Subject:Re: One Naples project Date:Monday, February 22, 2021 7:55:30 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. I included my address- Bay Colony. Sent from my iPhone On Feb 22, 2021, at 1:20 PM, McDanielBill <Bill.McDaniel@colliercountyfl.gov> wrote: Thank you for your email regarding One Naples. I appreciate you contacting me to provide your input and express your thoughts. I carefully consider all information and comments when items are presented to the Board of County Commissioners. Again, thank you for giving me the opportunity to be of assistance to you. I value and appreciate the support as well as your participation in the government of our community. I am always available should you have any questions or concerns you want to discuss. In the future, so that we can determine the location of all concerned constituents, we are asking that all emails include your address and phone number. Bill W. L. McDaniel, Jr., Vice Chair Commissioner, District 5 3299 Tamiami Trail, East Naples, FL 34112 239-252-8605 WEB PAGE: <image001.png> -----Original Message----- From: Sara Ellerhorst <sbellerhorst@aol.com> Sent: Monday, February 22, 2021 1:17 PM To: McDanielBill <Bill.McDaniel@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: One Naples project EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Please vote no - this project negatively impacts the quality of life for north Naples. I cannot think of anything positive for this area resulting from this project. Jim and Sara Ellerhorst 8960 Bay Colony Drive Sent from my iPhone Sent from my iPhone Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. From:Gary Scottoline To:McDanielBill Subject:Re: One Naples Project Date:Monday, February 22, 2021 11:06:21 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. In the future, so that we can determine the location of all concerned constituents, we are asking that all emails include your address and phone number. As requested FYI Gary Scottoline 800 Breakaway Lane Unit 104 Pelican Bay-Breakwater Naples, Fla 610-952-1186 On Feb 22, 2021, at 10:12 AM, McDanielBill <Bill.McDaniel@colliercountyfl.gov> wrote: Thank you for your email regarding One Naples. I appreciate you contacting me to provide your input and express your thoughts. I carefully consider all information and comments when items are presented to the Board of County Commissioners. Again, thank you for giving me the opportunity to be of assistance to you. I value and appreciate the support as well as your participation in the government of our community. I am always available should you have any questions or concerns you want to discuss. In the future, so that we can determine the location of all concerned constituents, we are asking that all emails include your address and phone number. Bill W. L. McDaniel, Jr., Vice Chair Commissioner, District 5 3299 Tamiami Trail, East Naples, FL 34112 239-252-8605 WEB PAGE: <image001.png> -----Original Message----- From: Gary Scottoline <gscottolin@aol.com> Sent: Monday, February 22, 2021 10:05 AM To: McDanielBill <Bill.McDaniel@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: One Naples Project EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. As a Pelican Bay homeowner, I am extremely concerned with what the One Naples project will do to the Vanderbilt beach area. It will overcrowd that vital county resource that so many need to have access to a beach for their families. It will also impact traffic and quality of life along Vanderbilt Beach Road, and also impact our Pelican Bay lifestyle, since folks will more than likely cut through Pelican Bay to avoid the Vanderbilt Rd., and Rt 41 intersection if the are traveling south. I must ask you to give your upmost consideration to stopping this disruptive project, no matter the money involved, to avoid making our corner of the world into another overbuilt Florida beach area. Remember, once the precedent is set the development floodgates will open! It is time to make a stand, and maintain what we have and not destroy it. Gary Scottoline 800 Breakaway Lane Naples Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. From:paul bennett To:SolisAndy; TaylorPenny; LoCastroRick; McDanielBill; BurtSaunders@colliercountyfl.gov Subject:Re: One Naples Project Date:Friday, February 26, 2021 11:10:10 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. > > Paul Bennett > 1079 Tivoli Court > Naples, FL 34104 > > Former address: > 7134 Blue Juniper Court #102 > Naples, FL 34109 >> >> >> >> Dear County Commissioners, >> >> I implore you not to support the zoning variance for the One Naples project. >> >> We do not want Naples to become the next Miami. Naples is unique like it is and we do not want to see it change. It is a desirable place to live because of the current zoning. Please do not attempt to change that. >> >> Sincerely, >> Paul Bennett From:STEVEN FITERMAN To:McDanielBill Subject:Re: ONE NAPLES PROJECT Date:Wednesday, February 24, 2021 6:48:43 PM Attachments:image001.png EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Mr. McDaniel, Thank you for your response, it is much appreciated. Per your request I live at 6967 Verde Way in Pelican Bay. My local phone number is 239.514.0250. Sincerely, Steve From: McDanielBill <Bill.McDaniel@colliercountyfl.gov> Date: Wednesday, February 24, 2021 at 6:12 PM To: STEVEN FITERMAN <scfiterman@yahoo.com> Subject: RE: ONE NAPLES PROJECT Thank you for your email regarding One Naples. I appreciate you contacting me to provide your input and express your thoughts. I carefully consider all information and comments when items are presented to the Board of County Commissioners. Again, thank you for giving me the opportunity to be of assistance to you. I value and appreciate the support as well as your participation in the government of our community. I am always available should you have any questions or concerns you want to discuss. In the future, so that we can determine the location of all concerned constituents, we are asking that all emails include your address and phone number. Bill W. L. McDaniel, Jr. Commissioner, District 5 3299 Tamiami Trail, East Naples, FL 34112 239-252-8605 WEB PAGE: From: STEVEN FITERMAN <scfiterman@yahoo.com> Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2021 1:10 PM To: McDanielBill <Bill.McDaniel@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: ONE NAPLES PROJECT EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioners Solis, Taylor, Daniel, Saunders, and Locastro, Please find attached a letter from Mr. Brian Maher President of the Trieste at Bay Colony POA in opposition of the One Naples Development plan as submitted to the County Planning Commission and County Board of Commissioners. I support Mr. Maher’s opposition and strongly recommend that the Board deny the project as submitted. Sincerely, Steven Fiterman Property Owner Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. From:Guy Kellam To:SolisAndy; GoodnerAngela; laura.layden@naplesnews.com Cc:SaundersBurt; TaylorPenny; SaboJames; LoCastroRick; McDanielBill Subject:Re: One Naples Public Hearing thoughts (3/1/2021) Date:Monday, March 1, 2021 11:04:45 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Just putting this out as part of the public record... In the end, all of the commissioners have been put in a tough position to make tough decisions. That said, after a long haul for many of us who have followed One Naples from the start (circa mid-2017), I for one am just extremely disappointed, not so much in the decision, but the fact that no one supported Penny Taylor, based on last minute substantive changes that were simply thrown out today with minimal review by staff, with no input from other stakeholders in the project (e.g. public, planning commission etc.). Raise your hand if any of you have any idea how DuRuMa fits in, other than some type of private 'open space', which was supposedly now key to making this happen, along with the requisite 'setback and height concessions'. One Naples project developer surprises Collier County officials with revised plans "Instead of postponing the hearing, the board broke early for lunch, giving county staff an hour to review the new information presented by Stock, so they could revise their comments and recommendations." If this how the Collier County board continues to make decisions on long term issues, you are doing a disservice to us all. I simply applaud Penny Taylor (District 4) for taking a prudent approach, while others including our own Andy Solis (District 2) simply couldn't be bothered, after a long night for all. That said, I think the scaled-down residential option was the best option, but am simply troubled by last minute changes which were not sufficiently vetted, even if on their face were beneficial. Regards, Guy Kellam On Monday, March 1, 2021, 09:22:45 PM EST, Guy Kellam <gkellam@yahoo.com> wrote: Hi Andy and Angela, Here are some of my thoughts, based on today's One Naples Public Hearing. Although I was not totally against a residential development, substantial changes made to the existing proposal (e.g. lowered height/modified setbacks/DuRuMa) today without diligent review/sign-off by the Planning Board and staff (reviewed at lunch) is just short-sighted, given the impact this project has on this area for years to come, without public input, even if it was subsequently put on the fast track. Penny Taylor had the most sensible statement all day, regardless of whether pro/con. The changes thrown in at the last minute were just plain unfair and needed to be reviewed, whether on the face of things they made sense or not. After all this time, dotting the I's and crossing the T's is a big deal. Just really disappointed that of all people, you Andy Solis simply decided to bail on District 2, by simply not allowing the whole board and staff to simply sleep on things overnight based on a long day and substantive changes. Just shows a complete lack of respect for your constituents, even if you had already made your mind up. Steps in the right direction 1) Decreased 10/2 height and increased setbacks (25ft in most areas, but still 0 along the Marina area, with less of concern with the 10ft within the property). 2) Traffic signal at intersection of Gulf Shore Drive and Vanderbilt Beach road will help smooth out car/pedestrian traffic, before 'going vertical'. Still areas of concern 1) No discussion regarding the impact on Naples Park This working class neighborhood is often an afterthought, where there will indeed be a direct impact, including cut throughs, where there still are no east/west sidewalks, as well as property value/tax implications. 2) Timelines and associated construction/infrastructure impact Got a really vague response to this one. It isn't hard to see how disruptive this will be, given how even a 'relatively' small Naples Park water project is dragging on, a single street at a time, including companies renting lots in Naples Park. What will happen here if approved? Are construction/infrastructure planned *during* high season and what is the perceived timeline the entire project? How would a hurricane, another pandemic or flooding affect the timeline and where will construction be staged, particularly once existing land cannot be used? 3) Parking Even if traffic patterns are improved, where will they park. One of the problems with having folks pay on their way out is that it will back up traffic *inside* the garage, where there is very limited space to maneuver. In the numerous times we have gone to the referenced Tin-City/5th Ave City of Naples area during weekends (including the recent Cars on Fifth), have not had any trouble finding parking. In addition, the parking garage is free, clearly shows the number of spots available and during our visits has never been full. As it turns out, there are actually two free public parking garages off Fifth Ave, one by Cambier Park and other behind the Yabaa restaurant, which is not the case here. 4) No clear indication of how many parking spots are allotted for One Naples residents and visitors, based on the number of units, which might directly result in spill-over. 5) Landscaping that cannot hide the height of the two towers. 6) Unknown Marina impact. 7) Although adding DuRaMa to this project appears to be a positive development, just dropping this in right before the hearing substantively changed the existing proposal without review. Regards, Guy Kellam 745 99th Ave N Naples, FL 34108 District 2 From:maureen trerice To:TaylorPenny; SaundersBurt; McDanielBill; LoCastroRick; SolisAndy Cc:Pelican Bay Subject:Re: One Naples Date:Monday, January 25, 2021 4:52:07 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. > On Jan 25, 2021, at 4:41 PM, maureen trerice <emtrerice@gmail.com> wrote: > > The beauty of the Bay Colony neighborhood, as shown in Sundays, excellent front page story, is due to the correct use of space, good planning and easements. In the same photo, a few blocks North, is the proposed One Naples project, which is seeking to appeal the current commercial zoning for a residential designation. > If approved, it will be seen as a very special case, due to the lack of easements between buildings and roads. It will also set new precedents for multi-storied parking garages in front of residential developments, only 15feet from the road. This is typical of a very urban environment. > If you look at the photo on 7A, the wall is behind the landscaping, and runs down the last block of Vanderbilt Beach Road, turns the corner heading North on Gulf Shore N. > What is not shown in the same photo, is the sidewalk, which in high season, has been clocked at 400 people an hour, with strollers, wagons, bikes and trikes, etc.. There was a picture showing parked car spaces, but no sidewalks. > This is a walled, exclusive resort dropped onto a laid back beach community. Keep it commercial until we know more. > This comprehensive article about a very complicated subject, had just one issue that is not up for debate. A bribe is a bribe whatever it’s painted. > > > > Maureen Trerice > 8171 Bay Colony Dr. Apt 2004 > Naples, Florida 34108 > 239-3548778 > > In the County Planning sessions, I watched on zoom, the footage from the wall to the road, was all over the map. Mostly, in the 15 to 25feet level and then 10 feet, if a store could be worked into the wall, or whatever would pass. I have no intent to deceive. It’s bad enough. From:maureen trerice To:TaylorPenny; SaundersBurt; McDanielBill; LoCastroRick; SolisAndy Cc:Pelican Bay Subject:Re: One Naples Date:Monday, January 25, 2021 4:52:07 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. > On Jan 25, 2021, at 4:41 PM, maureen trerice <emtrerice@gmail.com> wrote: > > The beauty of the Bay Colony neighborhood, as shown in Sundays, excellent front page story, is due to the correct use of space, good planning and easements. In the same photo, a few blocks North, is the proposed One Naples project, which is seeking to appeal the current commercial zoning for a residential designation. > If approved, it will be seen as a very special case, due to the lack of easements between buildings and roads. It will also set new precedents for multi-storied parking garages in front of residential developments, only 15feet from the road. This is typical of a very urban environment. > If you look at the photo on 7A, the wall is behind the landscaping, and runs down the last block of Vanderbilt Beach Road, turns the corner heading North on Gulf Shore N. > What is not shown in the same photo, is the sidewalk, which in high season, has been clocked at 400 people an hour, with strollers, wagons, bikes and trikes, etc.. There was a picture showing parked car spaces, but no sidewalks. > This is a walled, exclusive resort dropped onto a laid back beach community. Keep it commercial until we know more. > This comprehensive article about a very complicated subject, had just one issue that is not up for debate. A bribe is a bribe whatever it’s painted. > > > > Maureen Trerice > 8171 Bay Colony Dr. Apt 2004 > Naples, Florida 34108 > 239-3548778 > > In the County Planning sessions, I watched on zoom, the footage from the wall to the road, was all over the map. Mostly, in the 15 to 25feet level and then 10 feet, if a store could be worked into the wall, or whatever would pass. I have no intent to deceive. It’s bad enough. From:Thelma Giampapa To:McDanielBill Subject:Re: One Naples Date:Tuesday, February 9, 2021 10:51:12 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Hello ! Thank you for your quick response. As previously stated I hope that the size and scale and impact to the surrounding neighborhood of any project in your district is your main concern. We must have faith in our public servants that they will do the right thing! Thanks again Thelma Irene Giampapa 631 Beachwalk Cir UNit 202 Naples, Florida 34108 614-395-1900 On Feb 8, 2021, at 10:33 AM, McDanielBill <Bill.McDaniel@colliercountyfl.gov> wrote: Ms. Giampapa, Thank you for your email regarding One Naples. I appreciate you contacting me to provide your input and express your thoughts. I carefully consider all information and comments when items are presented to the Board of County Commissioners. Again, thank you for giving me the opportunity to be of assistance to you. I value and appreciate the support as well as your participation in the government of our community. I am always available should you have any questions or concerns you want to discuss. In the future, so that we can determine the location of all concerned constituents, we are asking that all emails include your address and phone number. Bill W. L. McDaniel, Jr. Commissioner, District 5 3299 Tamiami Trail, East Naples, FL 34112 239-252-8605 WEB PAGE: <image001.png> From: Thelma Irene Giampapa <info@savevanderbiltbeach.com> Sent: Monday, February 8, 2021 10:05 AM To: McDanielBill <Bill.McDaniel@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: One Naples EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: Dear Commissioner Taylor: I am a Florida resident and reside in Beachwalk Gardens only a block from the proposed One Naples project. Below is the email I just sent to Commissioner Solis but thought you too should see it. Thank you in advance for reading it and your thoughtful consideration. Dear Commissioner Solis, There is an old adage not to let someone else make their problem your problem. And it appears that may be what is happening here. You and your fellow commissioners do not have a problem here; you have an opportunity. An opportunity to serve your constituents, enhance your district, and leave a very positive legacy of contribution. Is the current One Naples proposal the best possible solution to this opportunity? The second observation is that if this project moves forward in a form close to the current proposal, it will be the gift that just keeps giving (and not in a positive way). The law of unintended consequences can be brutal and is almost certain to rear its ugly head when so little of the bigger, long term picture is visible. So like the overwhelming majority of my neighbors, I strongly encourage you to vote "NO" to the current proposal. There's a better solution. Let's find it. Sincerely, Thelma Irene Giampapa 631 Beachwalk Circle F202 Naples, FL 34108 __________________________ --------------------- Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. From:McDanielBill To:Cherie Bawduniak Subject:RE: One Naples Date:Monday, March 1, 2021 8:28:00 AM Attachments:image001.png Thank you for your email regarding One Naples. I appreciate you contacting me to provide your input and express your thoughts. I carefully consider all information and comments when items are presented to the Board of County Commissioners. Again, thank you for giving me the opportunity to be of assistance to you. I value and appreciate the support as well as your participation in the government of our community. I am always available should you have any questions or concerns you want to discuss. In the future, so that we can determine the location of all concerned constituents, we are asking that all emails include your address and phone number. Bill W. L. McDaniel, Jr. Commissioner, District 5 3299 Tamiami Trail, East Naples, FL 34112 239-252-8605 WEB PAGE: From: Cherie Bawduniak <cbawduniak4639@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, March 1, 2021 8:20 AM To: McDanielBill <Bill.McDaniel@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: One Naples EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. DENY THE ONE NAPLES GMP AMENDMENT Cherie and Joe Bawduniak 34109 From:Ralph Cowie To:AndySolis@colliercountyfl.gov; TaylorPenny; LoCastroRick; McDanielBill; SaundersBurt Subject:Re: ONE NAPLES Date:Sunday, February 21, 2021 10:47:18 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Commissioners; Sorry, my vote count as I stated was wrong. The vote of 60 residents was 32 yes for the $547,000. 22 voted NO and 6 did not vote which was also considered a NO. Approximately a month earlier without the $547,000. the vote was 32 NO, and less than 10 voted yes. Clearly, Brian Stock is BUYING the Barefoot Pelican Condominium Association. My current 'line of sight' to the Gulf will be blocked by the 20 foot wall in front of me and 87 feet tall shadow from the building next door. I ask all of you to consider the future of Vanderbilt Beach and your constituents, and ask a minimum of two of you to vote NO to ONE NAPLES. Ralph Cowie On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 3:18 PM Ralph Cowie <ralphcowie1@gmail.com> wrote: Commissioners, I would like to ask you to vote NO on the ONE NAPLES development at Vanderbilt Beach. I am not opposed to the development of this property, only the current design as presented by Stock Development. Brian Stock is not a good neighbor. The Barefoot Pelican Condominium Association has sent you a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) to support this development and I contend the vote of 62 yes, and 28 no, was a vote to accept over $547,000. (over $9,000. for each owner) from Vanderbilt Holdings (Stock Development) but not approval of the current designed development. The words of Andy Solis that financial inducement 'is not unusual' have come true. A payment to the County for property or development improvements may be permissible; however, I do not think a payment to a private organization should be acceptable and 'business as usual'. I plead with you to say NO to Barefoot Pelican and ONE NAPLES this development is not acceptable. I also believe this current design is not acceptable to Collier County residents. Please consider your constituents and their desire to oppose this project based on the one neighborhood meeting with approximately five people approving the project and over four hundred objecting. Also, please review the Save Vanderbilt Beach organization, and their reporting investigation and comments. The primary objections are density, traffic, and setbacks. The setback of ten feet along Vanderbilt Drive, Gulfshore Drive, and Southbay Drive is unacceptable and not to code. Specifically, the ten foot setback on Southbay Drive is at street level, with approximately five feet of building extension is atrocious. I live in building one at Barefoot Pelican and the result is a twenty foot wall in front of me. I am on the fourth floor and approximately 35 feet from ground level, the building next to me is 87 feet tall from ground level. The current building code is 70 feet from ground level. A reasonable change would be a building 70 feet tall with 25 foot setback. Therefore, I plead with you to reject this project and send it back to the Planning Board. I will lose my $9,000. but I am willing to donate $10,000. to any 'needing' organization in Collier County if two of you Commissioners vote NO. I am willing to commit my desire to maintain Vanderbilt Beach since I am a Florida resident. Attached is the view of a twenty foot wall (78 feet tall) in front of me as I read on my walkway. Ralph Cowie 271 Southbay Drive #142 248-914-8476 From:Maureen Corcoran To:McDanielBill Subject:Re: One Naples Date:Tuesday, February 16, 2021 12:24:54 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Bill, Thanks for the quick response. For the record, our phone number is below. Best, Maureen and Tom Corcoran 6573 Marissa Loop Naples FL 34108 617-485-7632 Sent from my iPad On Feb 16, 2021, at 10:22 AM, McDanielBill <Bill.McDaniel@colliercountyfl.gov> wrote: Thank you for your email regarding One Naples. I appreciate you contacting me to provide your input and express your thoughts. I carefully consider all information and comments when items are presented to the Board of County Commissioners. Again, thank you for giving me the opportunity to be of assistance to you. I value and appreciate the support as well as your participation in the government of our community. I am always available should you have any questions or concerns you want to discuss. In the future, so that we can determine the location of all concerned constituents, we are asking that all emails include your address and phone number. Bill William L. McDaniel, Jr., Vice Chairman Commissioner, District 5 3299 Tamiami Trail, East Naples, FL 34112 239-252-8605 Bill.mcdaniel@colliercountyfl.gov WEB PAGE: <image001.png> From: Maureen Corcoran <mpcorcoran24@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2021 9:48 AM To: McDanielBill <Bill.McDaniel@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: One Naples EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Bill, This project as currently proposed is way too dense for the area. Pls oppose as currently configured and leave some breathing room for everyone. Do not let this lovely spot turn into Miami Beach. Sincerely, Maureen and Tom Corcoran 6573 Marissa Loop Naples 34108 Sent from my iPad Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. From:Chris Pisani To:McDanielBill Subject:Re: One Naples Date:Tuesday, February 16, 2021 11:56:54 AM Attachments:image001.png EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Commissioner , my apology for the oversight . My address is : 11118 Gulf Shore Dr unit 504A Naples fl 34108 Phone # 239 595 2051 Please acknowledge receipt of this email. Thanks again On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 10:22 AM McDanielBill <Bill.McDaniel@colliercountyfl.gov> wrote: Thank you for your email regarding One Naples. I appreciate you contacting me to provide your input and express your thoughts. I carefully consider all information and comments when items are presented to the Board of County Commissioners. Again, thank you for giving me the opportunity to be of assistance to you. I value and appreciate the support as well as your participation in the government of our community. I am always available should you have any questions or concerns you want to discuss. In the future, so that we can determine the location of all concerned constituents, we are asking that all emails include your address and phone number. Bill William L. McDaniel, Jr., Vice Chairman Commissioner, District 5 3299 Tamiami Trail, East Naples, FL 34112 239-252-8605 Bill.mcdaniel@colliercountyfl.gov WEB PAGE: From: Chris Pisani <chrispisani1110@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2021 9:31 AM To: McDanielBill <Bill.McDaniel@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: One Naples EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Please stop the madness. The proverbial elephant on a postage stamp . Thank you for listening. Respectfully, Chris Pisani ( local year round home owner of 45 years ) -- ____________________________ Chris Pisani 239-595-2051 ChrisPisani1110@gmail.com Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. -- ____________________________ Chris Pisani 239-595-2051 ChrisPisani1110@gmail.com From:jonimcv@aol.com To:McDanielBill Subject:Re: One Naples Date:Wednesday, February 24, 2021 3:51:37 PM Attachments:image001.png EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Joan Verardo 8410 Excalibur Circle, A-6 Naples, FL 34108 Tel.# 631-754-1182 -----Original Message----- From: McDanielBill <Bill.McDaniel@colliercountyfl.gov> To: jonimcv@aol.com <jonimcv@aol.com> Sent: Wed, Feb 24, 2021 3:36 pm Subject: RE: One Naples Thank you for your email regarding One Naples. I appreciate you contacting me to provide your input and express your thoughts. I carefully consider all information and comments when items are presented to the Board of County Commissioners. Again, thank you for giving me the opportunity to be of assistance to you. I value and appreciate the support as well as your participation in the government of our community. I am always available should you have any questions or concerns you want to discuss. In the future, so that we can determine the location of all concerned constituents, we are asking that all emails include your address and phone number. Bill W. L. McDaniel, Jr. Commissioner, District 5 3299 Tamiami Trail, East Naples, FL 34112 239-252-8605 WEB PAGE: From: jonimcv@aol.com <jonimcv@aol.com> Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2021 3:25 PM To: McDanielBill <Bill.McDaniel@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: One Naples EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Mr. McDaniel, Please don’t be swayed by a big development corporation that wants to change the footprint of the Vanderbilt Beach area! Over 10 years ago I was fortunate to purchase a small condo not far from where the One Naples project is planned. As much as I loved coming down to enjoy the beaches and wonderful lifestyle of Southwest Florida, I could never stay for any long periods as I still worked. At last, I have now retired and can look forward to extended stays with friends and family. The only problem is this large scale development that threatens the natural beauty, peace and resources of this area. The very thing that convinced me to use savings and buy a slice of “heaven” is now in danger of being taken away. I don’t see how this project will benefit anyone in the long term except the people involved in its over development. While I count myself fortunate to even own property in this location, I must object to such major construction that will forever change the landscape. Believe me, I live in downstate New York and know what over development looks like. Once you go there you can never go back. I implore you to continue your good stewardship of our town and protect our habitat! Thank you for making the right decision to best serve the people, wildlife and resources of Vanderbilt Beach. Sincerely, Joan Verardo Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. From:bill eason To:McDanielBill Subject:Re: One Naples Date:Thursday, February 25, 2021 3:45:31 PM Attachments:image001.png EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. My address is 6601 Southfork Court. Naples. 34108 On Thu, Feb 25, 2021 at 3:41 PM McDanielBill <Bill.McDaniel@colliercountyfl.gov> wrote: Thank you for your email regarding One Naples. I appreciate you contacting me to provide your input and express your thoughts. I carefully consider all information and comments when items are presented to the Board of County Commissioners. Again, thank you for giving me the opportunity to be of assistance to you. I value and appreciate the support as well as your participation in the government of our community. I am always available should you have any questions or concerns you want to discuss. In the future, so that we can determine the location of all concerned constituents, we are asking that all emails include your address and phone number. Bill W. L. McDaniel, Jr. Commissioner, District 5 3299 Tamiami Trail, East Naples, FL 34112 239-252-8605 WEB PAGE: From: bill eason <bluechipflyer@gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2021 3:30 PM To: McDanielBill <Bill.McDaniel@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: One Naples EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. I oppose the project. I am a full time Pelican Bay resident Bill Eason 404-219-3479 bluechipflyer@gmail.com Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. -- Bill Eason 404-219-3479 bluechipflyer@gmail.com From:tina seely To:McDanielBill Subject:Re: One Naples Date:Friday, February 26, 2021 1:20:13 PM Attachments:image001.png EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Thank you for your quick response and all the work you do!! On Fri, Feb 26, 2021 at 1:16 PM McDanielBill <Bill.McDaniel@colliercountyfl.gov> wrote: Thank you for your email regarding One Naples. I appreciate you contacting me to provide your input and express your thoughts. I carefully consider all information and comments when items are presented to the Board of County Commissioners. Again, thank you for giving me the opportunity to be of assistance to you. I value and appreciate the support as well as your participation in the government of our community. I am always available should you have any questions or concerns you want to discuss. In the future, so that we can determine the location of all concerned constituents, we are asking that all emails include your address and phone number. Bill W. L. McDaniel, Jr. Commissioner, District 5 3299 Tamiami Trail, East Naples, FL 34112 239-252-8605 WEB PAGE: From: tina seely <tinaelangesseely@gmail.com> Sent: Friday, February 26, 2021 1:05 PM To: McDanielBill <Bill.McDaniel@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: One Naples EXTERNAL EMAIL:This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Good morning, Just wanted to send a quick email to say I am very excited about the One Naples community coming to our corner!! It will bring needed improvements. Sidewalks, lights, beautiful landscaping and wider street. Which is needed. I hope that it stays mostly residential. I live at the Barefoot Pelican. We bought 11 years ago. It is a wonderful corner. My wishes is that you as Commissioner’s will make a decision and do it quickly. We feel fortunate to have Stock Development involved in our slice of heaven corner. I have worked with them in the past and only have kind words to say. Please be part of moving this along. It seems like years that we have had to deal with this decision. I have two places at Barefoot Pelican and we are so very excited to see our corner in the near future! Thank you, Tina Seely Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. From:Arthur C Mueller To:McDanielBill Subject:Re: One Naples Date:Monday, March 1, 2021 8:46:27 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Well, you’re a disappointment. Art Mueller Pelican Bay Sent from my iPad > On Feb 28, 2021, at 7:08 AM, Arthur C Mueller <a.mueller@sbcglobal.net> wrote: > > Any one one the variance requests from Stock Developments should be enough to sink this project. I can’t even believe it’s being considered. The commission has allowed this to happen time and time again. A developer pays too much for a property and then > pays more to try to pressure the commissioners. Put an end to this ridiculous cycle. > VOTE NO ON ONE NAPLES! > Art & Ellen Mueller > Pelican Bay > > Sent from my iPad From:Staros, Edward To:McDanielBill Subject:RE: One Naples Date:Wednesday, February 24, 2021 4:03:12 PM Attachments:image001.png EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Bill, My home address is: 2538 Marquesa Royale Ln. Unit # 302, Naples, FL. 34109 My cell is: 239-248-2501 My business address is: Florida Gulf Coast University School of Resort & Hospitality Management Lutgert College of Business 10501 FGCU Boulevard South Fort Myers, FL. 33965-6565 Thank you, Ed Staros From: McDanielBill <Bill.McDaniel@colliercountyfl.gov> Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2021 3:36 PM To: Staros, Edward <estaros@fgcu.edu> Subject: RE: One Naples Mr. Staros, Thank you for your email regarding One Naples. I appreciate you contacting me to provide your input and express your thoughts. I carefully consider all information and comments when items are presented to the Board of County Commissioners. Again, thank you for giving me the opportunity to be of assistance to you. I value and appreciate the support as well as your participation in the government of our community. I am always available should you have any questions or concerns you want to discuss. In the future, so that we can determine the location of all concerned constituents, we are asking that all emails include your address and phone number. Bill W. L. McDaniel, Jr. Commissioner, District 5 3299 Tamiami Trail, East Naples, FL 34112 239-252-8605 WEB PAGE: From: Staros, Edward <estaros@fgcu.edu> Sent: Wednesday, February 24, 2021 3:07 PM To: SolisAndy <Andy.Solis@colliercountyfl.gov>; SaundersBurt <Burt.Saunders@colliercountyfl.gov>; penny.taylor@colliercounty.gov; McDanielBill <Bill.McDaniel@colliercountyfl.gov>; LoCastroRick <Rick.LoCastro@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: One Naples EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Collier County Commissioners, As a full time resident of Naples since September of 1999, as well as a business developer since March of 1983, I wanted to let you know that I am 100% fully supportive of Brian Stock’s One Naples project. As the third employee of The Ritz-Carlton Hotel Company, I was here for the groundbreaking of The Ritz-Carlton Naples and subsequently was part of the development, operational staffing and training of this iconic Hotel. Since that day of groundbreaking, circa April of 1983, I / we have wanted a premier residential next door neighbor on the site in question , which is exactly what Brian Stock has planed in the One Naples Development. I should also mention that over the past 20+ / - years I have gotten to know Brian very well and I am personally thrilled that Stock Development purchased this very difficult and awkward site and has come up with a beautiful residential plan for the neighborhood. Brian did this through the countless neighborhood meetings by listening to the public, modifying his plan and to do the right thing for the neighborhood. How many developers do you know that has had so many community meetings , listened, learned & reacted to the concerns of the neighborhood. The answer is very few developers would have been so accommodating. I very much hope that you take this support from a person that knows a lot about product & service excellence and know, that I believe in Brian Stock, I believe in One Naples as the right product for North Naples / Vanderbilt Beach Community and I believe this premier development will serve our community well . My very best regards to all of you, Ed Edward V. Staros Executive-in-Residence School of Resort and Hospitality Management /Lutgert College of Business 10501 FGCU Boulevard South, Fort Myers, FL 33965 | fgcu.edu P: 239 590 7854 | E: estros@fgcu.edu| C: 239 248 2501 Under Florida law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your email address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by phone or in writing. _________________________________________________________________ Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. From:Douglas Weber To:McDanielBill Subject:Re: ONE NAPLES Date:Saturday, February 6, 2021 4:44:39 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. From:Laura Simmelink To:McDanielBill Subject:Re: Opposition to One Naples Date:Sunday, February 28, 2021 8:06:39 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. I appreciate your response, particularly on a weekend. Please note that I am not opposed to development; I just want it to fit into the character of each neighborhood and for our elected officials to bear in mind that all decisions made today will set a precedent for the future in Collier County. Thank you for what you do for our community, particularly for Immokalee. I support economic growth in that area and think it is a wonderful community ripe for economic growth. Laura Simmelink On Feb 28, 2021, at 3:50 PM, McDanielBill <Bill.McDaniel@colliercountyfl.gov> wrote: Thank you for your email regarding One Naples. I appreciate you contacting me to provide your input and express your thoughts. I carefully consider all information and comments when items are presented to the Board of County Commissioners. Again, thank you for giving me the opportunity to be of assistance to you. I value and appreciate the support as well as your participation in the government of our community. I am always available should you have any questions or concerns you want to discuss. Bill W. L. McDaniel, Jr. Commissioner, District 5 3299 Tamiami Trail, East Naples, FL 34112 239-252-8605 WEB PAGE: <http://www.colliergov.net/CommissionerMcDaniel> ________________________________ Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. From:McDanielBill To:Stromberg, Clifford D. Subject:RE: Please Do NOT Approve the Stock-- One Naples Project Date:Monday, March 1, 2021 10:28:00 AM Attachments:image001.png image003.png Thank you for your email regarding One Naples. I appreciate you contacting me to provide your input and express your thoughts. I carefully consider all information and comments when items are presented to the Board of County Commissioners. Again, thank you for giving me the opportunity to be of assistance to you. I value and appreciate the support as well as your participation in the government of our community. I am always available should you have any questions or concerns you want to discuss. In the future, so that we can determine the location of all concerned constituents, we are asking that all emails include your address and phone number. Bill W. L. McDaniel, Jr. Commissioner, District 5 3299 Tamiami Trail, East Naples, FL 34112 239-252-8605 WEB PAGE: From: Stromberg, Clifford D. <clifford.stromberg@hoganlovells.com> Sent: Monday, March 1, 2021 8:51 AM To: SolisAndy <Andy.Solis@colliercountyfl.gov>; TaylorPenny <Penny.Taylor@colliercountyfl.gov>; LoCastroRick <Rick.LoCastro@colliercountyfl.gov>; McDanielBill <Bill.McDaniel@colliercountyfl.gov>; SaundersBurt <Burt.Saunders@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: Please Do NOT Approve the Stock-- One Naples Project EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Commissioners: My wife and I live in Pelican Bay, right adjacent to Vanderbilt Beach Road. The proposed Stock project would really destroy our neighborhood. As you know, in sum: 1. Both during construction and during occupancy, it would massively increase the already significant traffic on Vanderbilt Beach Road. Sound and congestion will be a real hit to the quality of life. 2. The size and density is inconsistent with the area. It is more similar to Miami Beach. Most of us chose Naples precisely to void that ambiance. We have gotten our children and friends to look and buy here in Naples because it is unique. 3. Stock is doing the usual game of proposing a massive project and then trying to appear reasonable by “tweaking” it by “concessions.” But the basic concept remains unsound given he neighborhood. The basic concept of huge building, shopping, and marina will bring lots of people, noise, traffic and change the character of the area. Boating will become congested and noisier. 4. There will be and “spillover” effects of traffic on nearby streets and neighborhoods . People will cut through neighborhoods to try to avoid the congestion. 5. Have no illusion: you will be setting a precedent, which will be used to justify ever more enormous projects. 6. I am not anti-growth at all. But growth has to be smart growth. This will depress not enhance property values. Good projects can be built –on the right locations. I am not one to obsess over every little change. But this is a watershed, and I urge you not to approve the One Naples project. Thanks for listening. Clifford D. Stromberg If you would like to know more about how we are managing the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on our firm then take a look at our brief Q&A. If you would like to know more about how to handle the COVID-19 issues facing your business then take a look at our information hub. About Hogan Lovells Hogan Lovells is an international legal practice that includes Hogan Lovells US LLP and Hogan Lovells International LLP. For more information, see www.hoganlovells.com. CONFIDENTIALITY. This email and any attachments are confidential, except where the email states it can be disclosed; it may also be privileged. If received in error, please do not disclose the contents to anyone, but notify the sender by return email and delete this email (and any attachments) from your system. From:Diane Linnan To:McDanielBill Subject:Re: PLEASE STOP NAPLES ONE Date:Monday, February 22, 2021 7:41:07 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. My address is : 5930 via Lugano Naples, Fl 34108 239-598-4731 Sent from my iPad On Feb 22, 2021, at 7:18 AM, McDanielBill <Bill.McDaniel@colliercountyfl.gov> wrote: Thank you for your email regarding One Naples. I appreciate you contacting me to provide your input and express your thoughts. I carefully consider all information and comments when items are presented to the Board of County Commissioners. Again, thank you for giving me the opportunity to be of assistance to you. I value and appreciate the support as well as your participation in the government of our community. I am always available should you have any questions or concerns you want to discuss. In the future, so that we can determine the location of all concerned constituents, we are asking that all emails include your address and phone number. Bill W. L. McDaniel, Jr., Vice Chair Commissioner, District 5 3299 Tamiami Trail, East Naples, FL 34112 239-252-8605 WEB PAGE: <image001.png> -----Original Message----- From: Diane Linnan <dinannil81@gmail.com> Sent: Sunday, February 21, 2021 8:37 AM To: McDanielBill <Bill.McDaniel@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: PLEASE STOP NAPLES ONE EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Sent from my iPad Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. From:bunnysam@bestselfusa.com To:McDanielBill Subject:RE: Say N O O O ! ! ! TO ONE NAPLES ! ! ! Date:Monday, March 1, 2021 8:28:42 AM Attachments:image001.png EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. VANDERBILT DR, 34108 From: McDanielBill [mailto:Bill.McDaniel@colliercountyfl.gov] Sent: Monday, March 1, 2021 8:00 AM To: bunnysam@bestselfusa.com Subject: RE: Say N O O O ! ! ! TO ONE NAPLES ! ! ! Thank you for your email regarding One Naples. I appreciate you contacting me to provide your input and express your thoughts. I carefully consider all information and comments when items are presented to the Board of County Commissioners. Again, thank you for giving me the opportunity to be of assistance to you. I value and appreciate the support as well as your participation in the government of our community. I am always available should you have any questions or concerns you want to discuss. In the future, so that we can determine the location of all concerned constituents, we are asking that all emails include your address and phone number. Bill W. L. McDaniel, Jr., Vice Chair Commissioner, District 5 3299 Tamiami Trail, East Naples, FL 34112 239-252-8605 WEB PAGE: From:bunnysam@bestselfusa.com <bunnysam@bestselfusa.com> Sent: Sunday, February 28, 2021 5:01 PM To: McDanielBill <Bill.McDaniel@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: Say N O O O ! ! ! TO ONE NAPLES ! ! ! Importance: High EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. We moved to Vanderbilt beach over 30 years ago because we did NOT want to live among high rises, like on the Gulf Shore Blvds. Having hundreds more local residents, and vehicles, adds NO value to my life, but adds congestion, and only benefits the condo builders/owners. Please stand for US, your local constituents. PLEASE say N O O O to One Naples ! ! ! Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. From:McDanielBill To:bunnysam@bestselfusa.com Subject:RE: Say N O O O ! ! ! TO ONE NAPLES ! ! ! Date:Monday, March 1, 2021 8:29:00 AM Attachments:image001.png Thank you for your email regarding One Naples. I appreciate you contacting me to provide your input and express your thoughts. I carefully consider all information and comments when items are presented to the Board of County Commissioners. Again, thank you for giving me the opportunity to be of assistance to you. I value and appreciate the support as well as your participation in the government of our community. I am always available should you have any questions or concerns you want to discuss. In the future, so that we can determine the location of all concerned constituents, we are asking that all emails include your address and phone number. Bill W. L. McDaniel, Jr. Commissioner, District 5 3299 Tamiami Trail, East Naples, FL 34112 239-252-8605 WEB PAGE: From: bunnysam@bestselfusa.com <bunnysam@bestselfusa.com> Sent: Monday, March 1, 2021 8:28 AM To: McDanielBill <Bill.McDaniel@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: RE: Say N O O O ! ! ! TO ONE NAPLES ! ! ! EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. VANDERBILT DR, 34108 From: McDanielBill [mailto:Bill.McDaniel@colliercountyfl.gov] Sent: Monday, March 1, 2021 8:00 AM To: bunnysam@bestselfusa.com Subject: RE: Say N O O O ! ! ! TO ONE NAPLES ! ! ! Thank you for your email regarding One Naples. I appreciate you contacting me to provide your input and express your thoughts. I carefully consider all information and comments when items are presented to the Board of County Commissioners. Again, thank you for giving me the opportunity to be of assistance to you. I value and appreciate the support as well as your participation in the government of our community. I am always available should you have any questions or concerns you want to discuss. In the future, so that we can determine the location of all concerned constituents, we are asking that all emails include your address and phone number. Bill W. L. McDaniel, Jr., Vice Chair Commissioner, District 5 3299 Tamiami Trail, East Naples, FL 34112 239-252-8605 WEB PAGE: From: bunnysam@bestselfusa.com <bunnysam@bestselfusa.com> Sent: Sunday, February 28, 2021 5:01 PM To: McDanielBill <Bill.McDaniel@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: Say N O O O ! ! ! TO ONE NAPLES ! ! ! Importance: High EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. We moved to Vanderbilt beach over 30 years ago because we did NOT want to live among high rises, like on the Gulf Shore Blvds. Having hundreds more local residents, and vehicles, adds NO value to my life, but adds congestion, and only benefits the condo builders/owners. Please stand for US, your local constituents. PLEASE say N O O O to One Naples ! ! ! Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. From:jim0529@aol.com To:McDanielBill Subject:re: Stock plan Date:Monday, March 1, 2021 9:51:29 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner Solis: I participated in the Zoom call you hosted on February 16, 2021 with representatives of many of the groups who oppose Stock’s One Naples project. I write to emphasize an additional, legal, argument that did not easily lend itself to discussion in the February 16 Zoom call. Stock’s proposal constitutes unlawful Spot Zoning. As you are a fellow litigator (I have been practicing for 42 years), I am hopeful that the controlling Florida case law and statutes described herein concerning Spot Zoning will resonate with you. Spot Zoning is the elephant in the room, as it condemns Stock’s proposed development. The Florida Supreme Court prohibited Spot Zoning in Parking Facilities v. City of Miami Beach, 88 So.2d 141 (1956). The Florida legislature codified this prohibition in Florida Statutes, Section 163.3194(3)(a). The prohibition is further codified in Policy 5.6 of the Future Land Use Element of the Collier County Growth Management Plan. Spot Zoning is the name given to the piecemeal rezoning of small parcels of land to a greater density, leading to disharmony with the surrounding area. Spot Zoning gives preferential treatment to one parcel at the expense of the zoning scheme as a whole. See Southwest Ranches Homeowners Assoc. v. Broward County, 502 So.2d 931, 935 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987). Unlawful Spot Zoning creates a small island of property with restrictions on its use different from that of surrounding properties, solely for the benefit of a particular property owner and to the detriment of the community or without a substantial public purpose. Allapattah Community Ass’n Inc. of Florida v. City of Miami, 379 So.2d 387 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); City Commissioner of the City of Miami v. Woodlawn Park Cemetery Co., 553 So.2d 1227, 1240 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989). The determination of Spot Zoning involves an examination of (1) the size of the spot; (2) the compatibility with the surrounding area; (3) the benefit to the owner and (4) the detriment to the immediate neighborhood. Parking facilities, Inc. v. City of Miami Beach, 88 So.2d 141 (Fla. 1956); Dade County v. Inversiones Rafamar S.A., 360 So.2d 1130 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978). In its proposal, Stock asks, solely in respect to its parcel, for (1) density that is double the density allowed by the current zoning law, (2) building heights that are double to triple the permissible building heights, (3) open space that is half of that required by the current zoning law, and (4) setbacks that are one-quarter of the setbacks currently required. Stock’s proposal is incompatible and inconsistent with, and in no way complementary to, the comprehensive plan, the current zoning rules, and the pertinent surrounding neighborhood. It seeks to create an impermissible “square peg” of land in an incompatible “round hole” community, to the great harm of, and with no benefit to, the entire community, for the sole benefit of the developer. Stock’s proposal is the poster child for unlawful Spot Zoning. Stock cannot properly rely on nearby properties in neighboring zones such as Bay Colony or Pelican Bay to create a purported compatibility that does not exist. Allowing comparisons with properties in other zones would impermissibly import a neighboring zone’s rules into a zone that has different zoning rules, just because it is nearby. Plainly, that would make Florida zoning laws meaningless. In Machado v. Musgrave, 519 So. 2d 629 (3d Dist. 1987), the court prohibited such a comparison, holding that “a comprehensive land plan legislatively sets a zoning norm for each zone,” not a single piece of property. One of the reasons for this rule, said the Machado court: “to avoid spot zoning.” Id. Collier County Land Development Code (“LDC”) Section 1.05.01F confirms this point. It provides: “Each zoning district has its own purpose and establishes its own density and intensity regulations.” Pelican Bay and Bay Colony provide particularly poor comparisons to the Vanderbilt Beach neighborhood in issue here, as they are vastly different communities with vastly different regulatory controls and restraints. Not surprisingly, the law does not allow Stock to avoid the Florida prohibition on Spot Zoning by separately seeking an amendment to the Growth Management Plan (“GMP”) that addresses only Stock’s parcel. As the Court in Machado explained, the prohibition on permitting a GMP amendment for a single piece of property “is the only way to (1) regulate and maintain land use by zones; (2) make individual zoning changes . . . conform to a legislated plan; and (3) avoid arbitrary spot zoning change that permits the use of individual parcels to depart from a plan.” Florida Statute 163.3194(1) confirms this point, providing that amending the GMP can only be done “as to the area of the entire zone,” not a single piece of property within the zone as sought by Stock. Indeed, the Court in Machado explained that under Section 163, local comprehensive plans “are not zoning laws.” They are “a limitation on a local governments . . . zoning powers.” Moreover, LDC Section 9.04.03 allows a zoning variance only if it is the minimum variance that will make possible the reasonable use of the land. Stock’s proposal plainly does not satisfy that requirement. Importantly, the stakes here are far bigger that the One Naples project currently in issue. If the Commissioners permit Stock’s current proposal to proceed, the Commissioners may render themselves powerless to stop the next project, and the next one after that, going north on Gulf Shore Drive. Currently, there is nothing in the neighborhood comparable to One Naples. So Spot Zoning flatly prohibits Stock’s proposal. But if the Commissioners allow One Naples to proceed, the next developer on Gulf Shore Drive will use One Naples as a comparable, and the Commissioners may have no principled basis for stopping that next proposal, and the next one, and the one after that. Right here, right now, the Commissioners will be condemning the Vanderbilt Beach and surrounding neighborhoods if they approve One Naples as currently proposed. Stock’s requested variances would benefit only Stock and would disregard entirely the rights of the residents of the area and the general public. Stock’s proposal would not create any resources useful to or needed by those who live in the area. To the contrary, the proposed development would do nothing more than accomplish an arbitrary, capricious, unlawful, and uncompensated wealth transfer of property from the thousands of residents who built and enjoyed their neighborhood over many decades and relied on the integrity of the current zoning rules, to a single developer. Indeed, in the face of the crescendo of community opposition to Stock’s proposal and the Planning Commission Staff’s recommendation against Stock’s proposal in its current form, the Collier County Planning Commissioners declined to approve Stock’s proposal. Nor can Stock plausibly claim that it would be unfair to deny its requested zoning variances. A developer who purchases land subject to existing zoning limitations accepts the risk that the limitations will remain in place. Stock knew when it purchased the land that its proposed project is prohibited by the zoning rules currently in force. The Planning Commission Staff Report dated September 24, 2020 agreed in 20 places that Stock’s proposal is incompatible and inconsistent with the Growth Management Plan. The Staff opined that Stock’s project could be approved only if its scope is dramatically reduced to comply with the current requirements for height, density and setbacks. Importantly, Florida Courts give no deference to the Commissioners’ judgment where Spot Zoning is in issue, because it is an issue of law. As explained in Machado, a court must review de novo, and with “strict scrutiny,” not deference, the Commissioners’ decision. A reviewing court would surely find Stock’s proposal to be prohibited, unlawful Spot Zoning. Attached hereto is a copy of an October 12, 2020 letter by my former law partner, Michael Austin, who represents a fellow member of the opposition to Stock’s proposed development, Ken Melkus. In his letter, Mr. Austin amplifies on the law of Spot Zoning and agrees that Stock’s proposed project constitutes unlawful Spot Zoning. Please remember that we voted you into PROTECT OUR COUNTY, to takecare of us and keep Naples great andclean and safe.. You are imposing on our safety, (moretraffic) , our beautiful beaches, and ourway of life.. Please keep your promises!!! thanks, Fran Occhiuto 16116 Camden Lakes Circle, Naples, From:Pyotts Email To:McDanielBill Subject:Re: Stock Project at Vanderbilt Beach Date:Monday, March 1, 2021 8:27:22 PM Attachments:image001.png EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. I was there at the meeting in the morning. I watched all afternoon until the evening. I’m watching to see what you do here. It’s disgusting that you all think you know better than the residents of this area. We don’t want this huge mess. And you are forcing it upon us! Shame on You if you vote for this. Shame on You!!! It should be smaller. Stock can still make their money! And we would be happy with that. On Feb 22, 2021, at 7:36 AM, Pyotts <pyotts@comcast.net> wrote: Yes - although this is the one that I copied and had not changed the “name” to yours. Sorry!! But thank you for your concern for Naples community residents! On Feb 22, 2021, at 7:15 AM, McDanielBill <Bill.McDaniel@colliercountyfl.gov> wrote: Thank you for your email regarding One Naples. I appreciate you contacting me to provide your input and express your thoughts. I carefully consider all information and comments when items are presented to the Board of County Commissioners. Again, thank you for giving me the opportunity to be of assistance to you. I value and appreciate the support as well as your participation in the government of our community. I am always available should you have any questions or concerns you want to discuss. In the future, so that we can determine the location of all concerned constituents, we are asking that all emails include your address and phone number. Bill W. L. McDaniel, Jr., Vice Chair Commissioner, District 5 3299 Tamiami Trail, East Naples, FL 34112 239-252-8605 WEB PAGE: -----Original Message----- From: Pyotts <pyotts@comcast.net> Sent: Sunday, February 21, 2021 11:09 PM To: McDanielBill <Bill.McDaniel@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: Stock Project at Vanderbilt Beach EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Commissioner Solis, The project that Stock has proposed at Vanderbilt Beach is simply wrong for this area. It will be too dense, extremely unsightly, dangerous and damaging to the area. This is our home. A monstrosity of that height will be visible from too many places. The plan they proposed for the water is too large for a small body of water. We understand fully that it will not remain as it is forever. What they have proposed is ridiculous and will provide no benefit whatsoever for the current residents here. It will only be an eyesore, a detriment, a danger, and a traffic nightmare. Stock overpaid for the property. That is their problem, it should not become our problem. When they bought it, they knew the zoning. If stock wants to build condos or townhomes on that land, it would be fine - as long as they do not exceed the 50 feet height restriction and if they abide by the current zoning density. Then and only then would I be in favor of it. If they feel they should develop it commercially instead, then let them abide by the same 50 foot height and other zoning limits, and keep it attractive with plantings. There is absolutely no valid reason or argument that can be given which is strong enough to warrant amending/altering the current zoning. If this project is allowed to proceed then you set a precedent, and future projects will use this in their arguments. Don’t turn our beautiful area into a dirty, overcrowded mini-Miami. Thank you. Rosemarie Pyott Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. From:Pyotts To:McDanielBill Subject:Re: Stock Project at Vanderbilt Beach Date:Monday, February 22, 2021 7:37:16 AM Attachments:image001.png EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Yes - although this is the one that I copied and had not changed the “name” to yours. Sorry!! But thank you for your concern for Naples community residents! On Feb 22, 2021, at 7:15 AM, McDanielBill <Bill.McDaniel@colliercountyfl.gov> wrote: Thank you for your email regarding One Naples. I appreciate you contacting me to provide your input and express your thoughts. I carefully consider all information and comments when items are presented to the Board of County Commissioners. Again, thank you for giving me the opportunity to be of assistance to you. I value and appreciate the support as well as your participation in the government of our community. I am always available should you have any questions or concerns you want to discuss. In the future, so that we can determine the location of all concerned constituents, we are asking that all emails include your address and phone number. Bill W. L. McDaniel, Jr., Vice Chair Commissioner, District 5 3299 Tamiami Trail, East Naples, FL 34112 239-252-8605 WEB PAGE: -----Original Message----- From: Pyotts <pyotts@comcast.net> Sent: Sunday, February 21, 2021 11:09 PM To: McDanielBill <Bill.McDaniel@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: Stock Project at Vanderbilt Beach EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Commissioner Solis, The project that Stock has proposed at Vanderbilt Beach is simply wrong for this area. It will be too dense, extremely unsightly, dangerous and damaging to the area. This is our home. A monstrosity of that height will be visible from too many places. The plan they proposed for the water is too large for a small body of water. We understand fully that it will not remain as it is forever. What they have proposed is ridiculous and will provide no benefit whatsoever for the current residents here. It will only be an eyesore, a detriment, a danger, and a traffic nightmare. Stock overpaid for the property. That is their problem, it should not become our problem. When they bought it, they knew the zoning. If stock wants to build condos or townhomes on that land, it would be fine - as long as they do not exceed the 50 feet height restriction and if they abide by the current zoning density. Then and only then would I be in favor of it. If they feel they should develop it commercially instead, then let them abide by the same 50 foot height and other zoning limits, and keep it attractive with plantings. There is absolutely no valid reason or argument that can be given which is strong enough to warrant amending/altering the current zoning. If this project is allowed to proceed then you set a precedent, and future projects will use this in their arguments. Don’t turn our beautiful area into a dirty, overcrowded mini-Miami. Thank you. Rosemarie Pyott Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. From:jwm2x@aol.com To:McDanielBill Subject:Re: stop ignoring code restrict Date:Wednesday, February 24, 2021 9:06:43 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. My address is 3310 Twilight Lane unit 6504 Naples, FL 34109 Phone is 239-254-8433 Add note .... two separate friends who visited Naples back in the 90s declined to come visit me because already it is so congested and no longer the pleasant charming city it used to be Lori plans to buy in south Florida and wants nothing to do with Naples By the way I gave you my landline so leave a message because I never answer it with all the robocalls Unfortunately I know you’ll understand I’m aware of the fact that land owners rights are protected by law but they also must answer to Zoning ordinances Sent from my iPhone On Feb 24, 2021, at 7:23 AM, McDanielBill <Bill.McDaniel@colliercountyfl.gov> wrote: Thank you for your email regarding One Naples. I appreciate you contacting me to provide your input and express your thoughts. I carefully consider all information and comments when items are presented to the Board of County Commissioners. Again, thank you for giving me the opportunity to be of assistance to you. I value and appreciate the support as well as your participation in the government of our community. I am always available should you have any questions or concerns you want to discuss. In the future, so that we can determine the location of all concerned constituents, we are asking that all emails include your address and phone number. Bill William L. McDaniel, Jr., Vice Chairman Commissioner, District 5 3299 Tamiami Trail, East Naples, FL 34112 239-252-8605 Bill.mcdaniel@colliercountyfl.gov WEB PAGE: <image001.png> From: Jeannette Malone <info@savevanderbiltbeach.com> Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2021 6:34 PM To: McDanielBill <Bill.McDaniel@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: stop ignoring code restrict EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: On March 1 you and your fellow Commissioners will be hearing Stock Development’s application for One Naples. I am writing you today to express my strong opposition to the development as Stock has proposed it. I know full well that this development is not in our District, and that you generally tend to vote with the Commissioner in whose District the project lies. But, in this case I ask you to act independently. Residents of Commissioner Solis’ District have overwhelmingly shown their opposition. I know that you are aware of that as I know that you have received hundreds of emails telling you so. I believe that Commissioner Solis intends to vote in support of the Stock amendment to the Growth Management Plan. His reason for doing so is flawed. He feels that the neighborhood is not capable of understanding the nuances of the matter before you, and that he, alone, know what is good for his District. When he tells people, “Be careful what you wish for.” he is saying that the residents of the affected neighborhood don’t know for what they are asking. I assure you that they do understand the ramifications of asking that Stock respect the existing C-3 zoning. One Naples is not simply a District 2 issue. It’s approval would send a message that for the Commissioners it’s “business as usual,” and the they have little concern for the “Miamification” of Collier County. It would represent the long- held pattern of the Board of County Commissioners supporting developers over neighborhoods. That must stop! I am asking you to vote to deny Stock’s proposed amendment to the Growth Management Plan. I cannot be more direct. You have for too long and for too often voted to allow developers to run slipshod over the wishes of your taxpaying constituents. I will be there on March 1st to hold your feet to the fire. __________________________ --------------------- Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. From:Jo Ellen Schroedter To:McDanielBill Subject:Re: STOP STOCK Date:Sunday, February 28, 2021 6:24:32 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Jo Ellen Schroedter 7702 Pebble Creek Cir 302 Naples 312-404-2536 A registered Floridian On Feb 28, 2021, at 4:00 PM, McDanielBill <Bill.McDaniel@colliercountyfl.gov> wrote: Thank you for your email regarding One Naples. I appreciate you contacting me to provide your input and express your thoughts. I carefully consider all information and comments when items are presented to the Board of County Commissioners. Again, thank you for giving me the opportunity to be of assistance to you. I value and appreciate the support as well as your participation in the government of our community. I am always available should you have any questions or concerns you want to discuss. In the future, so that we can determine the location of all concerned constituents, we are asking that all emails include your address and phone number. Bill W. L. McDaniel, Jr. Commissioner, District 5 3299 Tamiami Trail, East Naples, FL 34112 239-252-8605 WEB PAGE: <image001.png> -----Original Message----- From: Jo Ellen Schroedter <jschroedter34@gmail.com> Sent: Sunday, February 28, 2021 2:22 PM To: McDanielBill <Bill.McDaniel@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: STOP STOCK EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel, Please VOTE NO to allow Stock Development to proceed with not following zoning regulations on heights of buildings. Also, it is hard to believe that such an expensive community would allow the public to bike thru their property. We should ensure that right. Will the 90-boat marina be available to all or just to those residents of the property or their rights of first refusal. Sincerely, Jo Ellen Schroedter Pelican Bay property owner Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. From:Scott Zumstein To:McDanielBill Cc:scott@zumsteins.com Subject:RE: Urgent-Commissioners toxic dump Date:Tuesday, February 9, 2021 3:16:17 PM Attachments:image001.png EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Requested address. We have lived and thrived in Collier County for thirty five full time years. Marrying and born two sons (now in their early thirty’s). After two other homes on this water way we have settled in the saltwater/tidal community of Gulf Harbor, just off Wiggins Pass Rd. on the Cocohatchee River inside Wiggins Pass. We beach, we bike, we boat, we swim all around these waters and want to continue to do so. All along we have worked and invested in our community with dollars and volunteer time supporting our county youth/students. Please take care of your citizens and their investments! Please keep our environment healthy! Scott Zumstein 1281 Grand Canal Dr Naples, Florida 34110 239-860-9025 cell scott@zumsteins.com From: McDanielBill [mailto:Bill.McDaniel@colliercountyfl.gov] Sent: Tuesday, February 9, 2021 10:48 AM To: Scott Zumstein <scott@zumsteins.com> Subject: RE: Urgent-Commissioners toxic dump Mr. Zumstein, Thank you for your email regarding Item 11 D Big Cypress Basin (BCB) Boundary Expansion. I appreciate you contacting me to provide your input and express your thoughts. I carefully consider all information and comments when items are presented to the Board of County Commissioners. Again, thank you for giving me the opportunity to be of assistance to you. I value and appreciate the support as well as your participation in the government of our community. I am always available should you have any questions or concerns you want to discuss. In the future, so that we can determine the location of all concerned constituents, we are asking that all emails include your address and phone number. Bill W. L. McDaniel, Jr. Commissioner, District 5 3299 Tamiami Trail, East Naples, FL 34112 239-252-8605 WEB PAGE: From: Scott Zumstein <scott@zumsteins.com> Sent: Tuesday, February 9, 2021 10:45 AM To: SolisAndy <Andy.Solis@colliercountyfl.gov>; burt.sanders@colliercountyfl.gov; McDanielBill <Bill.McDaniel@colliercountyfl.gov>; TaylorPenny <Penny.Taylor@colliercountyfl.gov>; donna.fiala@colliercountyfl.gov; jeff.klatzlow@colliercountyfl.gov Cc: scott@zumsteins.com; Ken Oehler <kenoehler@comcast.net>; dnet95@gmail.com; cahendriks@comcast.net; 'Mike Dilley' <mdilley@gmail.com>; 'Ted Norris' <tedlnorris@gmail.com>; awilli9412@aol.com; info@captainsforcleanwater.org; max.chesnes@tcpalm.com; info@calusawaterkeeper.org; robm@conservancy.org; ConservationCollier <ConservationCollier@colliercountyfl.gov>; info@evergladesfoundation.org; brent.batten@naplesnews.com; investigations@winknews.com; awilliams@news-press.com; patrick.riley@naplesnews.com; kschneider@gannett.com Subject: Urgent-Commissioners toxic dump SWFWM & SFWM, C.C. Commissioners, Let’s call it what it is. Not pumping but dumping! Let’s identify what’s being dumped. Storm water is a kind term. How about toxic, dangerous, life, wild life and environment destroying sludge water. Flooded businesses, homes, garages and sheds off gassing, flooded septic tanks/field with fecal matter, flooded vehicles with oils and fuels, dead decaying animals all with a variety of pesticides, herbicides and fertilizers mixed in. As Erin Brockovich once stated “go ahead, I had that brought in especially for you”. There are thousands if not tens of thousands of Collier County tax paying citizens living, and supposedly enjoying their water front access, all along the water ways you want to toxic dump into. Waterways effected by toxic dumping; Coco Canal, Cocohatchee River, The Palm River, Wiggins Pass, North Channel to Imperial River and Estero Bay, South Channel to Turkey Bay and all the surrounding estuaries. Just to name a few. You cannot control where it goes. Home communities and Condo Towers effected by toxic dumping; Palm River, Horse Creek and Willoughby Acres (et al), Colliers Reserve, Gulf Harbor, Pelican Isle Yacht Club, Aqua, Kalea Bay, Marina Bay Club, The Dunes, Audubon Country Club, Wiggins Bay Club, Tarpon Cove, Wiggins Lake, The Old Florida Golf Club, All of Connors neighborhood off Vanderbilt Dr and all condo towers on Gulf Shore Dr. and lastly, but probably missed a few, the proposed (hopefully not) One Naples by Stock Development. State and Collier County Parks effected by toxic dumping; Delnor-Wiggins Pass State Park and Collier County’s Lely Barefoot Beach. Both of the parks have inland estuaries. The immediate concern; You are violating your own disclosure and notification protocals. Have you notified all the citizens in these communities? Are you willing to go against these communities concerns of clean water and safe environments? Are you willing to pollute the quality of life of the neighborhood citizens and families? Are you willing to drive down property equites and values with a toxic dump? Concerned for a quality of life, Scott Zumstein scott@zumsteins.com 239-860-9025 cell Scott Thanks for keeping me in the loop Pumps - when I read 'pumps' Quail West immediately came to mind. Quail West has illegally used pumps to divert flood waters from their golf course; I say illegally, because they were fined for taking that action; they paid the fine, apparently because they were of the opinion that it would be less money than repairing their flooded golf course. One would think that the flood waters would flow SW everywhere south of Bonita Beach Road; perhaps not, as pumps were need to move the water to where it would naturally flow away from their golf course; maybe there are lands south of Bonita Beach Road that are 'naturally' part of the Imperial River Drainage Basin?? One can bet that the powerhouse golf/gated developments along Immokalee Road, including Quail Creek, Quail West and Grey Oaks are players in this unfolding 'who gets the flood waters' drama. The water that we are all trying to deal with, wants to move South and West. The Imperial River Basin has always flooded, and Lee County has done a miserable job of managing the development of the Bonita Springs area; they want the problem to be someone else's. Couple that with Collier County's desire/need to ever expand the Sanitary Treatment Facilities on Goodlette - Frank Road, and you have what to me at least, is a clear motive for the continued proposals to divert the flood waters into the Cocohatchee River; the golf/gated communities are in lock-step with whatever proposal routes the water away from them. IMHO the water wants to predominantly flow South to Picayune Strand, Fakahatchee Strand and to Big Cypress. There is a Coastal Ridge on both coasts of Florida that funnels the water South into Florida Bay. The Coastal Rivers that, in our case, flow West are diminutive and are incapable of handling the water that careless development has diverted into them, and proposes to divert into them. Once more, we are banging our heads against nature _ that never works out good. From: Ken [mailto:kenoehler@comcast.net] Sent: Monday, February 8, 2021 5:58 PM To: Scott Zumstein <scott@zumsteins.com> Subject: Fwd: Big Cypress Basin Scott You may already be aware that the state sfwmd is in effect backfiring Bonita springs attempt to send their flood waters to Palm River and Cocohatchee River and on to your waters. Here is an email Danette huff who lives on sharwood sent to commissioners. I will send a similar but less lengthy demanding they prevent this from happy. Let Lee county solve its own flooding problem. Ken Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: Danette Huff <dnet95@gmail.com> Date: February 8, 2021 at 5:51:38 PM EST To: Ken <kenoehler@comcast.net> Subject: Fwd: Big Cypress Basin Hi Ken, here is the email address for Saunders. Burt.Saunders@CollierCountyFL.Gov Please give me a call if you have any questions. 239-595-5610 ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Danette <dnet95@gmail.com> Date: Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 4:58 PM Subject: Fwd: Big Cypress Basin To: Ken <kenoehler@comcast.net> Hi Ken, Here is the email I sent to Craig-the attachment has the language. I will send you Comm. Saunders email when I get a minute. Thank you, Danettep Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: Danette Huff <dnet95@gmail.com> Date: February 8, 2021 at 2:51:22 PM EST To: Craig Hendriks <cahendriks@comcast.net> Subject: Big Cypress Basin Craig, The attached document has the language. Subject: Item 11 D Big Cypress Basin (BCB) Boundary Expansion Commissioners, First of all, thank you Commissioner Taylor for recalling this item. An expansion of the Big Cypress Basin has no benefit to Collier County. It will negatively impact a large portion of North Naples residents. This bill opens the door to diversion of water from Lee County down through Collier County, specifically to the Immokalee Road Canal and out into the sensitive Cocohatchee River Estuary and into Wiggins Bay which is an Outstanding Florida Waterbody. Regardless of how this is being presented, if you are familiar with the history it’s obvious that moving water south from Lee County into Collier County is the ultimate goal of this bill. Palm River, Cocohatchee River Estates, the Bay House, and Colliers Reserve had a meeting with Big Cypress Basin and County staff about this two years ago. Residents had a lot of questions and very few answers were provided. We were promised this wouldn’t move forward until our questions were answered and there were assurances that water wouldn’t be moved south or if it was, it wouldn’t affect our properties. Our trust was rewarded with a bill being pushed through via a budget document and no discussion with the stakeholders. The term “scientific” is being used very loosely. While this may have been valid pre-development, it is no longer the way water flows in the existing built environment. Although SFWMD states they reviewed existing permits, the reality doesn’t reflect their study results. If you need evidence, look at the pumps that would have been required for the Bonita diversion project. If water flowed that way naturally, a pump wouldn’t be required. You may recall a former SFWMD board member used the term “shared adversity” when he spoke of taking the flood water from Bonita Springs and pumping it south to the Immokalee Road Canal out to the Cocohatchee River and Estuary. The term “shared adversity” was used to describe the damage from flooding the Bonita stormwater would cause in residential areas such as Palm River, Collier’s Reserve, Horse Creek, and Cocohatchee River Estates. He spoke specifically of lessening the duration of flooding for a few hundred houses in Bonita Springs by flooding some homes in Palm River. While I sympathize with the residents of Bonita Springs, I object to becoming the affected area as we purchased our property in good faith after doing our due diligence about stormwater management. Regulations for stormwater design criteria were created and development was permitted, inspected, and approved by the SFWMD and Lee County and other government agencies. It is unrealistic to expect that the Collier County property owners calmly accept that their properties will now flood or at best, be de-valued due to government agencies that acted in bad faith, allowing areas of Lee County to be overdeveloped to the point of flooding. The burden of Lee County’s and/or municipalities Growth Management Divisions and SFWMD’s failure to plan sufficiently; allow development to go beyond what their stormwater management system can handle; or meet their concurrency requirements should not be placed on our shoulders and flood us out of our homes or drive our property values down. Before you provide support to this bill, could you please answer the following questions? If you are unable to answer them, could you please actively work to ensure this bill is not passed until answers are provided? 1. There is not enough capacity in Collier County’s existing stormwater management system as evidenced by existing flooding events. The existing stormwater management system infrastructure is also failing. What is being done to address those issues as well as meet the challenges of sea level rise? What are the costs of those improvements? I recall a stormwater funding issue that was attempted to be addressed in the form of a stormwater utility that failed. Why would you add stormwater from another County when stormwater management issues aren’t able to be appropriately funded here? 2. Collier County is already struggling with water quality, 36% of Collier County watersheds are impaired, including the Cocohatchee River watershed. Polluted stormwater runoff is causing algae blooms and other issues in stormwater ponds, in the canals, the estuaries and in the Gulf of Mexico. Some of the algae blooms give off toxins of which very little is known about the potential adverse health effects. Allowing more stormwater will make it worse. How would you require Lee County to treat their water before it is allowed to be shipped south? How would you be able to mandate and ensure treatment is working? What are those costs? Or conversely, how much will that treatment and monitoring cost Collier County residents? 3. Water management issues will continue to worsen due to sea level rise. The areas that would be required to share the adversity are adjacent to a tidal waterbody. As sea level rise is making these properties vulnerable to repeated inundation, why would you allow the addition of water from another county to worsen Collier County property owners’ situations? 4. How are you assuring Collier County’s stormwater management system is concurrent? 5. Have the areas downstream of the primary water management system been modeled? Why take on additional water without knowing if there is capacity or if the system is concurrent? 6. What are the impacts from the addition of Bonita National stormwater? 7. What assurances do we have that no negative impacts to our properties will result from this boundary expansion? We know that this bill is the first step in moving water south from Lee County to Collier County to alleviate flooding in Lee County. In addition to all of these unanswered questions and there is a huge negative impact to Collier County residents, I can’t imagine why you would support the expansion of the Big Cypress Basin Boundary. I can only hope that you will actively work to make sure the bill doesn’t pass. Please, as our representatives, speak for us as if it were your home being threatened. Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. From:McDanielBill To:Bob Mendelsohn Subject:RE: Vanderbilt and Stock Developers. Date:Monday, March 1, 2021 10:50:00 AM Attachments:image001.png Thank you for your email regarding One Naples. I appreciate you contacting me to provide your input and express your thoughts. I carefully consider all information and comments when items are presented to the Board of County Commissioners. Again, thank you for giving me the opportunity to be of assistance to you. I value and appreciate the support as well as your participation in the government of our community. I am always available should you have any questions or concerns you want to discuss. Bill W. L. McDaniel, Jr. Commissioner, District 5 3299 Tamiami Trail, East Naples, FL 34112 239-252-8605 WEB PAGE: From: Bob Mendelsohn <bob.mgtd@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, March 1, 2021 10:29 AM To: SolisAndy <Andy.Solis@colliercountyfl.gov>; rick.locastro@colliercounty.gov; burt.saunders@colliercountyfl.giv; penny.tsylor@collierciuntyfl.gov; McDanielBill <Bill.McDaniel@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: Vanderbilt and Stock Developers. EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Please don't allow Stock any more code variances regarding the Vanderbilt site. It will add nothing to the value, utility or beauty of the area. Hold their feet to the fire! Lynne Mendelsohn 661 Mainsail Pl. Naples From:Paul Shea To:McDanielBill Subject:Re: Vanderbilt neighborhood- ONE Naples Request to Change the GMP Date:Friday, February 19, 2021 4:00:20 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Thank you for your response and thank you for the great work you do for the County. Paul Shea On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 7:15 AM McDanielBill <Bill.McDaniel@colliercountyfl.gov> wrote: Thank you for your email regarding One Naples. I appreciate you contacting me to provide your input and express your thoughts. I carefully consider all information and comments when items are presented to the Board of County Commissioners. Again, thank you for giving me the opportunity to be of assistance to you. I value and appreciate the support as well as your participation in the government of our community. I am always available should you have any questions or concerns you want to discuss. Bill W. L. McDaniel, Jr. Commissioner, District 5 3299 Tamiami Trail, East Naples, FL 34112 239-252-8605 WEB PAGE: <http://www.colliergov.net/CommissionerMcDaniel> ________________________________ Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. -- Paul Shea "What have you done today that will make a difference tomorrow?" From:Paul Shea To:McDanielBill Subject:Re: Vanderbilt neighborhood- ONE Naples Request to Change the GMP Date:Wednesday, February 17, 2021 8:55:01 PM Attachments:image001.png EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Any particular time he is available ? On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 5:43 PM McDanielBill <Bill.McDaniel@colliercountyfl.gov> wrote: Mr. Shea, Commissioner McDaniel would like you to call him at 239-253-1617 (cell). Thank you. Sue Filson, Aide to W. L. McDaniel, Jr. Commissioner, District 5 3299 Tamiami Trail, East Naples, FL 34112 239-252-8605 Sue.filson@colliercountyfl.gov WEB PAGE: From: Paul R. Shea <info@savevanderbiltbeach.com> Sent: Wednesday, February 17, 2021 4:05 PM To: McDanielBill <Bill.McDaniel@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: Vanderbilt neighborhood- ONE Naples Request to Change the GMP EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: I am a member of the County Planning Commission and I sat through the many hours of testimony at our CCPC meetings regarding the ONE Naples request. I am relatively new to the Planning Commission. Prior to being appointed I was part of our majority population that believed the County always approves developer requests to change the Growth Management . This is one of the reasons, I accepted the position. That reputation has to change. We represent the residents not the developers. My mindset is you establish a plan that the residents can rely on and only make changes that benefit the residents of Collier County. I also, go to Vanderbilt beach regularly. To me this is a no brainer to not approve this application. There is no good reason or any resident support to change our current GMP and certainly no benefit other than to the developer. If you support this request to change, you will be continuing to prove to the residents of Collier County that you do not represent the residents but rather the developers which would be a very sad message to send the public. And quite frankly it would make me reconsider if it is worth my time to be a Planning Commissioner. Please do the right thing and vote against the ONE Naples request. __________________________ --------------------- Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. -- Paul Shea "What have you done today that will make a difference tomorrow?" From:Pam Rons To:McDanielBill Subject:Re: Vanderbilt neighborhood Date:Tuesday, February 23, 2021 2:05:47 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: I appreciate that you are taking the time to review emails, and know your job is not easy! My husband and I greatly enjoy living in Naples and just want to be sure that any new development that is going to take such a prime spot—nearly the only remaining site available anywhere so close to a great beach—will not damage or harm the area where so many property owners, residents and visitors walk/bike/sun/socialize and linger. I know we all share the goal of ensuring any development does not violate the existing zoning rules in so many negative and troubling ways. (Height; density doubled; hotel without any details; Marina without any environmental impact study etc). The Stock Development proposal must be rejected as submitted. THANKS Pamela Rons The Vineyards 754 Vistana Circle Naples, FL. P.s. In my earlier email my address was clearly displayed under my signature! On Feb 23, 2021, at 11:25 AM, McDanielBill <Bill.McDaniel@colliercountyfl.gov> wrote: Thank you for your email regarding One Naples. I appreciate you contacting me to provide your input and express your thoughts. I carefully consider all information and comments when items are presented to the Board of County Commissioners. Again, thank you for giving me the opportunity to be of assistance to you. I value and appreciate the support as well as your participation in the government of our community. I am always available should you have any questions or concerns you want to discuss. In the future, so that we can determine the location of all concerned constituents, we are asking that all emails include your address and phone number. Bill W. L. McDaniel, Jr. Commissioner, District 5 3299 Tamiami Trail, East Naples, FL 34112 239-252-8605 WEB PAGE: <image001.png> From: Pam Rons <info@savevanderbiltbeach.com> Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2021 10:23 AM To: McDanielBill <Bill.McDaniel@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: Vanderbilt neighborhood EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: I live in The Vineyards, District 3, and for the past 8 years regularly walk in the Vanderbilt Beach neighborhoods and often use the Vanderbilt beach. I strongly oppose the STOCK DEVELOPMENT proposed BUILDING application to erect towers TWICE the zoned height permitted; that encroaches on reasonable and necessary setbacks, and also proposed a HOTEL without ANY assessment of the increased traffic/damage this could cause to the neighborhoods and beach areas. Finally, there is NO ASSESSMENT as to how a MARINA would impact and possibly damage the delicate wildlife and entire beach area so no Marina should ever be considered without a full assessment and public scrutiny. The Stock Development as proposed is hostile and damaging far far outside the strict parameters of the zoning rules expressly designed to PROTECT the rights of property owners already in the neighborhood, and the residents and visitors to this area who enjoy the benefits of low rise buildings, limiting density of residents and their cars, and can safely walk/bike near existing buildings that have APPROPRIATE setbacks. WHY would any Collier County Commissioner consider waiving these rules when it would damage every single tangible benefit the rules were passed to protect: views, pedestrian safety, density, traffic, wildlife protection, property values. I was an attorney for over 30 years and clearly understand the need to insist that Stock respect the existing C-3 zoning. I ask that you vote to deny his proposed amendment to the Growth Management Plan. Despite the pandemic, I will try to attend the hearing on 3/1 because this issue is very important to the community. Sincerely, Pam Rons 754 Vistana Circle Naples __________________________ --------------------- Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. From:Vickie Rydz To:McDanielBill Subject:Re: Vanderbilt neighborhood Date:Tuesday, February 23, 2021 9:18:06 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. I give you my address and phone number strictly for you to know I am a real person, a resident of District 2, and user of Vanderbilt Beach. I am strongly opposed to the Stock amendments. Actually, I am opposed to any development on the proposed site. It is already too crowded there, especially in season. Vickie Rydz 5932 Sand Wedge Lane Naples 34110 239-595-7076 Sent from my iPhone On Feb 23, 2021, at 8:18 AM, McDanielBill <Bill.McDaniel@colliercountyfl.gov> wrote: Thank you for your email regarding One Naples. I appreciate you contacting me to provide your input and express your thoughts. I carefully consider all information and comments when items are presented to the Board of County Commissioners. Again, thank you for giving me the opportunity to be of assistance to you. I value and appreciate the support as well as your participation in the government of our community. I am always available should you have any questions or concerns you want to discuss. In the future, so that we can determine the location of all concerned constituents, we are asking that all emails include your address and phone number. Bill W. L. McDaniel, Jr. Commissioner, District 5 3299 Tamiami Trail, East Naples, FL 34112 239-252-8605 WEB PAGE: <image001.png> From: Vickie Rydz <info@savevanderbiltbeach.com> Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2021 7:56 AM To: McDanielBill <Bill.McDaniel@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: Vanderbilt neighborhood EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: On March 1 you and your fellow Commissioners will be hearing Stock Development’s application for One Naples. I am writing you today to express my strong opposition to the development as Stock has proposed it. I know full well that this development is not in your District, and that you generally tend to vote with the Commissioner in whose District the project lies. But, in this case I ask you to act independently. Residents of Commissioner Solis’ District have overwhelmingly shown. I believe that Commissioner Solis intends to vote in support of the Stock amendment to the Growth Management Plan. He feels that the neighborhood is not capable of understanding the nuances of the matter before you, and that he, alone, know what is good for his District. When he tells people, “Be careful what you wish for.” he is saying that the residents (like me) of the affected neighborhood don’t know for what they are asking. I assure you that I do understand the ramifications of asking that Stock respect the existing C-3 zoning. One Naples is not simply a District 2 issue. It’s approval would send a message that for the Commissioners it’s “business as usual,” and the they have little concern for the “Miamification” of Collier County. I am asking you to vote to deny Stock’s proposed amendment to the Growth Management Plan. Sincerely Vickie __________________________ --------------------- Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. From:Jean Burton To:McDanielBill Subject:Re: Vanderbilt neighborhood Date:Thursday, February 18, 2021 10:20:57 AM Attachments:image001.png EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Thank you for your response. Jean Burton 8439 Gleneagle Way Naples, FL 34120 239-339-3232 On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 10:14 AM McDanielBill <Bill.McDaniel@colliercountyfl.gov> wrote: Thank you for your email regarding One Naples. I appreciate you contacting me to provide your input and express your thoughts. I carefully consider all information and comments when items are presented to the Board of County Commissioners. Again, thank you for giving me the opportunity to be of assistance to you. I value and appreciate the support as well as your participation in the government of our community. I am always available should you have any questions or concerns you want to discuss. In the future, so that we can determine the location of all concerned constituents, we are asking that all emails include your address and phone number. Bill W. L. McDaniel, Jr. Commissioner, District 5 3299 Tamiami Trail, East Naples, FL 34112 239-252-8605 WEB PAGE: From: Burton Jean <info@savevanderbiltbeach.com> Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2021 9:22 AM To: McDanielBill <Bill.McDaniel@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: Vanderbilt neighborhood EXTERNAL EMAIL:This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: On March 1 you and your fellow Commissioners will be hearing Stock Development’s application for One Naples. I am writing you today to express my strong opposition to the development as Stock has proposed it. I know full well that this development is not in our District, and that you generally tend to vote with the Commissioner in whose District the project lies. But, in this case I ask you to act independently. Residents of Commissioner Solis’ District have overwhelmingly shown their opposition. I know that you are aware of that as I know that you have received hundreds of emails telling you so. I believe that Commissioner Solis intends to vote in support of the Stock amendment to the Growth Management Plan. His reason for doing so is flawed. He feels that the neighborhood is not capable of understanding the nuances of the matter before you, and that he, alone, know what is good for his District. When he tells people, “Be careful what you wish for.” he is saying that the residents of the affected neighborhood don’t know for what they are asking. I assure you that they do understand the ramifications of asking that Stock respect the existing C-3 zoning. One Naples is not simply a District 2 issue. It’s approval would send a message that for the Commissioners it’s “business as usual,” and the they have little concern for the “Miamification” of Collier County. It would represent the long-held pattern of the Board of County Commissioners supporting developers over neighborhoods. That must stop! I am asking you to vote to deny Stock’s proposed amendment to the Growth Management Plan. I cannot be more direct. You have for too long and for too often voted to allow developers to run slipshod over the wishes of your taxpaying constituents. I will be there on March 1st to hold your feet to the fire. Jean Burton __________________________ --------------------- Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. From:peter heath To:SolisAndy; TaylorPenny; LoCastroRick; McDanielBill; SaundersBurt Subject:Re: Vote NO for One Naples Date:Sunday, February 28, 2021 11:18:47 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Collier County Commissioners: We ask that you do not consider passing any development which does not adhere to current zoning in all ways including height, residential density, setback, green space etc. Pete and Kim Heath On Wednesday, February 24, 2021, 01:36:30 PM EST, peter heath <heaths2004@yahoo.com> wrote: Collier County Commissioners: As you consider Mr. Stock's proposal, please be guided by your obligation to the residents of all of Collier County. A tasteful, modest development, of appropriate scale, consistent and compatible with the current neighborhood and its zoning requirements, can be a responsible enhancement to the area. But, as proposed, the Stock development is not responsible. It is too expansive, too tall, forces upon us too big of a marina, and mocks appropriate established setbacks and green space requirements. Most importantly, please bear in mind before you vote, that it is against current zoning regulations, and flouts the Collier County Land Development Code, which was established to protect our county from exactly this type of overdevelopment! Vanderbilt Beach is a popular county beach and should remain accessible to all county residents. Vanderbilt Beach Road and Gulf Shore Boulevard are single lanes, and are already heavily congested with cars, bicycles, and pedestrians. The additional burden this proposal imposes will overwhelm the current infrastructure. To Mr. Stock, this is only a money making scheme that he is vigorously trying to foist upon your constituents. As county commissioners, please consider all of your county residents. That is your charge. This includes not only the neighbors to One Naples, but all residents of the entire county. This vote will set a precedent for how all of Collier County will be allowed to grow in the future. Will Collier County grow according to the established Land Development Code, or will Mr. Stock, and other developers who will then follow his lead, be allowed to look upon the code with derision, and then talk the board into changing it to fit their personal wants? If so, why was a Land Development Code ever established? It will have totally lost its intended purpose. Please stand for the voices of all the people. Vote NO to this condescending proposal. This is our county, this is our beach access. Please represent all of us. Thank you. Sincerely, Kim and Peter Heath 8375 Excalibur Circle, Unit I-7 Naples, Florida 34108 From:KRISTIN HARVEY To:McDanielBill Subject:Re: Vote NO on One Naples Date:Wednesday, February 17, 2021 8:53:02 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Thank you for getting back to me regarding my email, you are the only commissioner to respond. I hope with all my heart you do not approve the Naples One project as the loss to this beach community and our town will be so detrimental on such a level there will be no coming back! Thank you again. Respectfully, Kristin Harvey > On Feb 17, 2021, at 8:42 AM, McDanielBill <Bill.McDaniel@colliercountyfl.gov> wrote: > > > > Thank you for your email regarding One Naples. I appreciate you contacting me to provide your input and express your thoughts. I carefully consider all information and comments when items are presented to the Board of County Commissioners. > > Again, thank you for giving me the opportunity to be of assistance to you. I value and appreciate the support as well as your participation in the government of our community. > > I am always available should you have any questions or concerns you want to discuss. > > Bill > W. L. McDaniel, Jr. > Commissioner, District 5 > 3299 Tamiami Trail, East > Naples, FL 34112 > 239-252-8605 > WEB PAGE: <http://www.colliergov.net/CommissionerMcDaniel> > > > ________________________________ > > Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. > <image001.png> From:McDanielBill To:carole feagler Subject:RE: Your legacy and reputation Date:Monday, March 1, 2021 10:44:00 AM Attachments:image001.png Thank you for your email regarding One Naples. I appreciate you contacting me to provide your input and express your thoughts. I carefully consider all information and comments when items are presented to the Board of County Commissioners. Again, thank you for giving me the opportunity to be of assistance to you. I value and appreciate the support as well as your participation in the government of our community. I am always available should you have any questions or concerns you want to discuss. In the future, so that we can determine the location of all concerned constituents, we are asking that all emails include your address and phone number. Bill W. L. McDaniel, Jr., Vice Chair Commissioner, District 5 3299 Tamiami Trail, East Naples, FL 34112 239-252-8605 WEB PAGE: -----Original Message----- From: carole feagler <cjfeagler@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, March 1, 2021 9:47 AM To: SolisAndy <Andy.Solis@colliercountyfl.gov>; McDanielBill <Bill.McDaniel@colliercountyfl.gov>; SaundersBurt <Burt.Saunders@colliercountyfl.gov> Subject: Your legacy and reputation EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. This does not bode well for Pelican Bay— please vote NO for this invasive process. These are smooth operators...beware!!! Carole Feagler PB resident Sent from my iPhone From:Ken Melkus To:SaundersBurt; LykinsDave; LoCastroRick; CapizziAixa; SolisAndy; GoodnerAngela; McDanielBill; TaylorPenny; GrecoSherry Cc:Ken Melkus Subject:Real Life...not a distant aerial view Date:Saturday, February 27, 2021 5:39:54 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Commissioners, this should enable you to get an appreciation for what a 30-35 foot wall looks like...imagine only a 15 foot setback...this wall stretches for nearly a quarter mile around the garage area...quite a difference from a distant aerial view used by the applicant! Sent from my iPad From:Anita Wilcheck To:McDanielBill Subject:Requesting your denial of the proposed Naples One Project Date:Monday, February 15, 2021 5:40:56 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: I am asking you and all of the Commissioners of Collier County to deny Stock Development's request for their Naples One Project. I live across from Buzz's Lighthouse and have been here for almost 16 years. I lived at the north end of the street for 12 years prior to this also. I love my neighborhood. What's not to love? Its so hard for me to understand how there is even a consideration of allowing this project to move forward. To give them the density, the limited setbacks, and the heights of the buildings that they're asking for is incomprehensible to me. Unless you live here you can't know what is best for the neighborhood. For Stock to try their scare tactics of a gas station being built here or another Publix is ludicrous. If that was ever a consideration then it would've already been built. I disagree completely with Stock on their insistence that their project would bring far fewer cars than a commercial development. If it was financially feasible to build a small commercial development with shops and restaurants I'd say let's go for it. That would at least benefit all of Collier County. Stock's proposal doesn't benefit all of the county at all. What Stock wants is completely contrary to what was written in the Growth Management Plan for Collier County. I don't understand how the commissioners can vote yes for this project as it is currently drawn. Please listen to me and my neighbors (and not the ones who are saying yes because Stock is going to make improvements to their existing condo buildings for their yes vote.). On March 1 you and your fellow commissioners will be hearing Stock Developers application for One Naples. I am begging you today to oppose the development as Stock has currently proposed it. I assure you that I do understand the ramifications of asking that Stock respect the existing C-3 zoning and I am asking you to vote to deny his proposed amendment to the Growth Management Plan. I will be there on March 1 to show all of the Commissioners that we are committed to saving this area. Vanderbilt Beach belongs to all of Collier County and not just the people who live on Gulf Shore Drive. I truly want what I personally feel is best for our county and all of its residents. Voting against Stock's request for an amendment to the Growth Management Plan will send him back to the drawing board. Perhaps he can come up with a plan that is more suited to the location. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Anita Wilcheck __________________________ --------------------- From:peter heath To:SolisAndy; TaylorPenny; LoCastroRick; McDanielBill; SaundersBurt Subject:Round about safety Date:Monday, March 1, 2021 4:16:15 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Round abouts are very dangerous for pedestrians and bicycles. This is a safety concern for such a congested area. Magnified when cars, bikes and people are not familiar with the area or the proper use of round abouts. Kim Heath On Sunday, February 28, 2021, 11:18:24 AM EST, peter heath <heaths2004@yahoo.com> wrote: Collier County Commissioners: We ask that you do not consider passing any development which does not adhere to current zoning in all ways including height, residential density, setback, green space etc. Pete and Kim Heath On Wednesday, February 24, 2021, 01:36:30 PM EST, peter heath <heaths2004@yahoo.com> wrote: Collier County Commissioners: As you consider Mr. Stock's proposal, please be guided by your obligation to the residents of all of Collier County. A tasteful, modest development, of appropriate scale, consistent and compatible with the current neighborhood and its zoning requirements, can be a responsible enhancement to the area. But, as proposed, the Stock development is not responsible. It is too expansive, too tall, forces upon us too big of a marina, and mocks appropriate established setbacks and green space requirements. Most importantly, please bear in mind before you vote, that it is against current zoning regulations, and flouts the Collier County Land Development Code, which was established to protect our county from exactly this type of overdevelopment! Vanderbilt Beach is a popular county beach and should remain accessible to all county residents. Vanderbilt Beach Road and Gulf Shore Boulevard are single lanes, and are already heavily congested with cars, bicycles, and pedestrians. The additional burden this proposal imposes will overwhelm the current infrastructure. To Mr. Stock, this is only a money making scheme that he is vigorously trying to foist upon your constituents. As county commissioners, please consider all of your county residents. That is your charge. This includes not only the neighbors to One Naples, but all residents of the entire county. This vote will set a precedent for how all of Collier County will be allowed to grow in the future. Will Collier County grow according to the established Land Development Code, or will Mr. Stock, and other developers who will then follow his lead, be allowed to look upon the code with derision, and then talk the board into changing it to fit their personal wants? If so, why was a Land Development Code ever established? It will have totally lost its intended purpose. Please stand for the voices of all the people. Vote NO to this condescending proposal. This is our county, this is our beach access. Please represent all of us. Thank you. Sincerely, Kim and Peter Heath 8375 Excalibur Circle, Unit I-7 Naples, Florida 34108 From:Sam Price To:McDanielBill Subject:sam@lp-pc.com Date:Monday, February 15, 2021 9:41:36 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: On March 1 you and your fellow Commissioners will be hearing Stock Development’s application for One Naples. I am writing you today to express my strong opposition to the development as Stock has proposed it. I know full well that this development is not in our District, and that you generally tend to vote with the Commissioner in whose District the project lies. But, in this case I ask you to act independently. Residents of Commissioner Solis’ District have overwhelmingly shown their opposition. I know that you are aware of that as I know that you have received hundreds of emails telling you so. I believe that Commissioner Solis intends to vote in support of the Stock amendment to the Growth Management Plan. His reason for doing so is flawed. He feels that the neighborhood is not capable of understanding the nuances of the matter before you, and that he, alone, know what is good for his District. When he tells people, “Be careful what you wish for.” he is saying that the residents of the affected neighborhood don’t know for what they are asking. I assure you that they do understand the ramifications of asking that Stock respect the existing C-3 zoning. One Naples is not simply a District 2 issue. It’s approval would send a message that for the Commissioners it’s “business as usual,” and the they have little concern for the “Miamification” of Collier County. It would represent the long-held pattern of the Board of County Commissioners supporting developers over neighborhoods. That must stop! I am asking you to vote to deny Stock’s proposed amendment to the Growth Management Plan. I cannot be more direct. You have for too long and for too often voted to allow developers to run slipshod over the wishes of your taxpaying constituents. I will be there on March 1st to hold your feet to the fire. __________________________ --------------------- From:Ken Columbia To:McDanielBill Subject:Save Vanderbilt Bach Date:Sunday, February 28, 2021 11:49:36 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: Please VOTE NO to Stock’s One Naples Development request to amend the County’s Growth Management Plan (GMP) at the March meeting. Sincerely Ken Columbia and Paula Fasser __________________________ --------------------- From:Beth Summer To:McDanielBill Subject:Save Vanderbilt Beach Date:Saturday, February 27, 2021 2:48:17 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Mr McDaniel, I am writing to you today to request that you disallow the passage of One Naples project. I am a beach goer. I park at the Vanderbilt Beach garage, walk to the beach and enjoy the gulf. It is always very crowded there with pedestrians, bicyclists and cars. Lots of stop and go at the intersection of Gulf Shore Dr and Vanderbilt Beach Rd. I love the charm of the "old Florida" that is currently there. After all, isn't that one of the reasons that Naples is attractive to tourists because of the "old Florida" charm and small town feel. One Naples would be the beginning of destroying the area little by little, especially for the residents and neighborhood. I urge you....please do not let the One Naples project go forward. Thank you. Beth Summer 9184 Ores Circle Naples 34120 From:Ann Andersen & Tom Hurvis To:McDanielBill Subject:Save Vanderbilt Beach Date:Wednesday, February 10, 2021 6:34:37 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: On March 1 you and your fellow Commissioners will be hearing Stock Development’s application for One Naples. I am writing you today to express my strong opposition to the development as Stock has proposed it. I know full well that this development is not in our District, and that you generally tend to vote with the Commissioner in whose District the project lies. But, in this case I ask you to act independently. Residents of Commissioner Solis’ District have overwhelmingly shown their opposition. I know that you are aware of that as I know that you have received hundreds of emails telling you so. I believe that Commissioner Solis intends to vote in support of the Stock amendment to the Growth Management Plan. His reason for doing so is flawed. He feels that the neighborhood is not capable of understanding the nuances of the matter before you, and that he, alone, know what is good for his District. When he tells people, “Be careful what you wish for.” he is saying that the residents of the affected neighborhood don’t know for what they are asking. I assure you that they do understand the ramifications of asking that Stock respect the existing C-3 zoning. One Naples is not simply a District 2 issue. It’s approval would send a message that for the Commissioners it’s “business as usual,” and the they have little concern for the “Miamification” of Collier County. It would represent the long-held pattern of the Board of County Commissioners supporting developers over neighborhoods. That must stop! I am asking you to vote to deny Stock’s proposed amendment to the Growth Management Plan. I cannot be more direct. You have for too long and for too often voted to allow developers to run slipshod over the wishes of your taxpaying constituents. Ann Andersen & Tom Hurvis __________________________ --------------------- From:Julie wyman To:SolisAndy; McDanielBill; SaundersBurt; TaylorPenny; ricklocastro@colliercountyfl.gov Subject:Saving the future of Collier County starts March 1, 2021 Date:Friday, February 26, 2021 1:54:29 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Good afternoon Collier County Commissioners, How do you make Collier County the best place to live, work and play? By protecting every single piece of land and every precious body of water going forward from disastrous attacks such as the pollution runoffs of overdevelopment whenever you can ... and you can start March 1, 2021, with your vote... NO to Stock's OneNaples. The only way to preserve quality of life and a beautiful future for County residents as well as protect our wildlife is to stop approving outrageous massive residential developments --such as OneNaples which would be built steps away from Vanderbilt Lagoon, a County Coastal Treasure. Vote NO to Stock's OneNaples. Should you say "yes" to developers such as Stock and let them proceed as they wish, say "Goodbye" to future beautiful open 'green' spaces and new County parks -- they will be replaced by the ugliness of concrete and asphalt developments. Commissioners, start the ball rolling-- only YOU have the power to VOTE for a bright future for Collier County. Long after you are no longer commissioners you will be able to look back proudly knowing you were the "Beacon of Hope" for Collier County's future because you voted NO to OneNaples and its zoning change. Thank you for your thoughtful consideration, Sam and I really appreciate it... We hope to start sleeping again March 1st! Have a good weekend and see you Monday!! Julie and Sam Wyman Pelican Bay Full time residents From:bunnysam@bestselfusa.com To:McDanielBill Subject:Say N O O O ! ! ! TO ONE NAPLES ! ! ! Date:Sunday, February 28, 2021 5:00:56 PM Importance:High EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. We moved to Vanderbilt beach over 30 years ago because we did NOT want to live among high rises, like on the Gulf Shore Blvds. Having hundreds more local residents, and vehicles, adds NO value to my life, but adds congestion, and only benefits the condo builders/owners. Please stand for US, your local constituents. PLEASE say N O O O to One Naples ! ! ! From:Jenna Buzzacco-Foerster Cc:Michael Dalby Subject:Sent on behalf of Michael Dalby, president & CEO of the Greater Naples Chamber Date:Friday, February 26, 2021 8:29:55 AM Attachments:LOS One Naples - Naples Chamber.pdf RE Sent on behalf of Michael Dalby president CEO of the Greater Naples Chamber.msg EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Good morning, Chair Taylor and Collier County Commissioners – Attached you’ll find a letter from Michael Dalby, president and CEO of the Greater Naples Chamber, in support of the One Naples project. Please feel free to reach out to Michael directly if you would like to discuss further. Thank you – JENNA BUZZACCO-FOERSTER Director of Government Relations Greater Naples Chamber P: 239.298.7929 E: jenna@napleschamber.org 2390 Tamiami Tr. N., #210 Naples, FL 34103 www.NaplesChamber.org Facebook | Twitter | Instagram From:tightlines10@comcast.net To:McDanielBill Subject:SPECIAL MEETING ONE NAPLES Date:Monday, March 1, 2021 8:01:42 PM Attachments:a6523463-e388-460e-b430-d1f0a22d7d3b.png EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. stooped again From: "tightlines10@comcast.net" <tightlines10@comcast.net> Subject: Fwd: BCC/One Naples Virtual Public Comment Confirmation Date: March 1, 2021 at 7:55:48 PM EST To: Commissioner Andy Solis <Andy.Solis@CollierCountyFL.gov> Cc: Shelley Payer <tightlines10@comcast.net> Dear Andy, I have listened to this special meeting all day and now 7:50pm the calls have closed without me be called on.In advance, I’ll wait for your positive vote as you are not a very good a very poker player. Your excitement to the potential DaRuma property gave it away. Again, I am disgusted with the Growth Management operation and in sensitivity. Nice move that that Zoning and Planning were not aware of the changes presented today. After a short lunch they were able to sign it off. I guess they will find out what in it after they read it another day. Another NEW president. Shameful of you ALL. Very truly yours, James Payer 141 Caribbean Rd. Naples, FL 34108 Begin forwarded message: From: "BCC Virtual Meetings" <no-reply@zoom.us> Subject: BCC/One Naples Virtual Public Comment Confirmation Date: February 28, 2021 at 12:21:29 PM EST To: tightlines10@comcast.net Reply-To: "BCC Virtual Meetings" <BCC_VirtualMeetings@colliercountyfl.gov> Hi James Payer, Thank you for registering for "BCC/One Naples Virtual Public Comment". ======================================================================================== This is an automatically generated email. Please do not reply as the email address is not monitored for received mail. ======================================================================================== Public comments will be audio only. You will be able to see the County Board Room but not the other participants. Your microphone will be muted until it is your turn to speak. Your comments are limited to 3 minutes. Please make sure to follow the meeting closely, we will call your name out 3 times before we move on to the next speaker. Chat will be disabled during this meeting, but if you have a concern or missed your speaking time there will be a raise your hand option to ask the host a question. For those who are using a regular phone to call in you can dial *9 to raise your hand during the meeting, the host will call you to answer any questions. Please note that profanity and abusive speech is not allowed during the meeting. Violators will be muted and removed from the meeting. Please submit any questions to: BCC_VirtualMeetings@colliercountyfl.gov Date Time: Mar 1, 2021 09:00 AM Eastern Time (US and Canada) Join from a PC, Mac, iPad, iPhone or Android device: Click Here to Join Note: This link should not be shared with others; it is unique to you. Passcode: 484529 Add to Calendar Add to Google Calendar Add to Yahoo Calendar Description: As part of an ongoing initiative to promote social distancing during the COVID-19 pandemic, the public will have the opportunity to provide public comments remotely, as well as in person, during the Collier County Board of County Commissioners meeting taking place at 9:00am, March 1, 2021. Speakers must complete and submit registration prior to the Item they wish to speak about begins. Remote participants will not be allowed to receive speaking time from another speaker or to provide speaking time to another speaker. Only enter one speakers name in the field below. Remote participation is provided as a courtesy and is at the user’s risk. The County is not responsible for technical issues. Or iPhone one-tap : US: +13017158592,,81991992150# or +13126266799,,81991992150# Or Telephone: Dial(for higher quality, dial a number based on your current location): US: +1 301 715 8592 or +1 312 626 6799 or +1 646 876 9923 or +1 408 638 0968 or +1 669 900 6833 or +1 253 215 8782 or +1 346 248 7799 or 877 853 5257 (Toll Free) or 888 475 4499 (Toll Free) or 833 548 0276 (Toll Free) or 833 548 0282 (Toll Free) Webinar ID: 819 9199 2150 Passcode: 484529 International numbers available: https://us02web.zoom.us/u/kFzttRTur You can cancel your registration at any time. From:Susan Knox To:McDanielBill Subject:Stock Dev. “One Naples” Date:Thursday, February 25, 2021 7:49:59 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. STOP with this over dense development. We don’t want Naples looking like the East coast. Be more like Sanibel. Period. Sent from my iPad From:Elaine Dunn To:McDanielBill Subject:Stock Development Date:Sunday, February 21, 2021 10:46:14 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Please vote against Stock Development they will ruin Vanderbilt Beach and tourism!! Elaine Dunn Sent from my iPhone From:Rick Tonis To:McDanielBill Subject:Stock Development, One Naples project Date:Tuesday, February 9, 2021 11:36:57 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Mr. LoCastro, As with many, I am opposed to the Stock Development, One Naples project. I would encourage you to announce your opposition as soon as possible. Best regards, Rick & Mary Tonis 6657 Trident Way Naples, FL 34108 From:Linda Harden To:SolisAndy; TaylorPenny; Burt.Sanders@colliercountyfl.gov; SolisAndy; McDanielBill Subject:Stock Development Date:Sunday, February 28, 2021 11:32:01 AM Attachments:ATT00001.txt EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Stock Development had an ad in today’s NDN saying that their proposed behemoth will not impede traffic on Vanderbilt Beach Road. Here is an actual photo of beach traffic on just one of our many beautiful days....and this photo does not even show that this backup goes all the way back to 41. Just an FYI. I hope you will show this photo at your next meeting and ask Brian Stock to comment on it. Thanks. From:Linda Harden To:TaylorPenny; Burt.Sanders@colliercountyfl.gov; SolisAndy; McDanielBill Subject:Stock Development/One Naples Date:Sunday, February 28, 2021 11:39:03 AM Attachments:ATT00001.txt EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Here is another photo of the VBR traffic you can ask Brian Stock about. His project will cause so many Naples residents to be unable to go to the beach they have been going to for years. Ask Brian Stock if he cares about that. Thanks very much. From:kantor716@comcast.net To:SaundersBurt; SolisAndy; TaylorPenny; McDanielBill; LoCastroRick Subject:Stock Development-One Naples Support Letter Date:Sunday, February 28, 2021 7:24:02 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. February 28, 2021 Honorable Chair Taylor and Commissioners Solis, Saunders, McDaniel and Lo Castro: I am writing to you as a proud 40+ year resident of North Naples, District 2, Collier County in support of the “One Naples” project which is coming before you for a vote. As a resident of the Dunes community, and a commercial building and business owner on 96th and 41, my husband and I spend most of our time commuting in this area, and swim at the Vanderbilt Beach location on the gulf. We believe this project Stock Development is proposing reflects the kind of smart, stable growth my family and I wish to see in our community. We know many in our community here believe this corner has been not only somewhat of an eye sore, but also troublesome and dangerous, and certainly goes against our collective mission for the beautiful community we all strive to achieve. The beauty and scope of this project is beneficial alone in so many ways and additionally, this LOCAL builder has offered to improve the SAFETY of the intersection of Vanderbilt Beach Road and Gulf Shore Drive, provide connected public bicycle paths throughout “One Naples”, create a lush, tropical garden with the installation of mature, native landscaping throughout the project’s corridor and a coffee shop – deli open to the public ALL AT NO EXPENSE TO THE TAXPAYERS. The above facts are reason enough to support this project, however we also benefit from the increase of our residential tax -base, collection of impact fees, hiring of local contractors adding to a positive economic advantage for our own community members as well as substantially lower traffic based on a residential rather than a new commercial project provide a magnitude of added benefits. I am asking you to support “One Naples” based on the facts and benefits to our community. Thank you for your consideration, your leadership and your service to our community and county. Sincerely, Kim Kantor 239-851-5800 285 Grande Way #1202 Naples, Florida 34110 From:Pyotts To:McDanielBill Subject:Stock Project at Vanderbilt Beach Date:Sunday, February 21, 2021 11:09:11 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Commissioner Solis, The project that Stock has proposed at Vanderbilt Beach is simply wrong for this area. It will be too dense, extremely unsightly, dangerous and damaging to the area. This is our home. A monstrosity of that height will be visible from too many places. The plan they proposed for the water is too large for a small body of water. We understand fully that it will not remain as it is forever. What they have proposed is ridiculous and will provide no benefit whatsoever for the current residents here. It will only be an eyesore, a detriment, a danger, and a traffic nightmare. Stock overpaid for the property. That is their problem, it should not become our problem. When they bought it, they knew the zoning. If stock wants to build condos or townhomes on that land, it would be fine - as long as they do not exceed the 50 feet height restriction and if they abide by the current zoning density. Then and only then would I be in favor of it. If they feel they should develop it commercially instead, then let them abide by the same 50 foot height and other zoning limits, and keep it attractive with plantings. There is absolutely no valid reason or argument that can be given which is strong enough to warrant amending/altering the current zoning. If this project is allowed to proceed then you set a precedent, and future projects will use this in their arguments. Don’t turn our beautiful area into a dirty, overcrowded mini-Miami. Thank you. Rosemarie Pyott From:Pyotts To:McDanielBill Subject:Stock Vanderbilt Beach Project Date:Sunday, February 21, 2021 11:11:17 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Commissioner McDaniel, The project that Stock has proposed at Vanderbilt Beach is simply wrong for this area. It will be too dense, extremely unsightly, dangerous and damaging to the area. This is our home. A monstrosity of that height will be visible from too many places. The plan they proposed for the water is too large for a small body of water. We understand fully that it will not remain as it is forever. What they have proposed is ridiculous and will provide no benefit whatsoever for the current residents here. It will only be an eyesore, a detriment, a danger, and a traffic nightmare. Stock overpaid for the property. That is their problem, it should not become our problem. When they bought it, they knew the zoning. If stock wants to build condos or townhomes on that land, it would be fine - as long as they do not exceed the 50 feet height restriction and if they abide by the current zoning density. Then and only then would I be in favor of it. If they feel they should develop it commercially instead, then let them abide by the same 50 foot height and other zoning limits, and keep it attractive with plantings. There is absolutely no valid reason or argument that can be given which is strong enough to warrant amending/altering the current zoning. If this project is allowed to proceed then you set a precedent, and future projects will use this in their arguments. Don’t turn our beautiful area into a dirty, overcrowded mini-Miami. Thank you. Rosemarie Pyott From:David J Burns To:McDanielBill Subject:Stock/Naples One and Vanderbilt Neighborhood Date:Saturday, January 2, 2021 12:45:52 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: I am writing you today to express my opposition to the Stock Development One Naples as it is currently proposed. I was encouraged by the action of the Planning Commission and their inability to recommend approval not only of the current Stock plan, but of a watered-down version that reduced the outrageous tower heights by almost 25%, and extremely diminished setbacks. They did their job, protecting the community. Now it’s your turn. Planning Commissioner Frye said it best when he asked the other Commissioners how they could ignore the outpouring of sentiment from the community. These are your constituents, your voters. Isn’t it your responsibility to listen to those who will live with this atrocity for decades to come and to vehemently deny the developer the right to build it? If hundreds of emails exhorting you to deny the project are not enough, if more than eighty people who signed up to speak against the project at the Planning Commission are not enough, if the 1,100 members of Save Vanderbilt Beach, forty percent of whom have contributed more than $100,000 to engage experts and fight the development are not enough, what exactly will be enough to persuade you to do the right thing? Please, when it comes before you, vote to deny the project as it is currently proposed. If you do approve something for the site, and remember we are not opposed to reasonable development, please approve the project with the conditions that your own Planning Staff proposed. They are reasonable and result in a project that is compatible with and complementary to the neighborhood. In hopes of a more reasonable project, I am respectfully, __________________________ --------------------- From:Kent L Piewtsch To:McDanielBill Subject:Stock’s One Naples Date:Tuesday, February 9, 2021 11:39:55 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: On March 1 you and your fellow Commissioners will be hearing Stock Development’s application for One Naples. I am writing you today to express in strongest terms my complete opposition to the development as Stock as it has most recently proposed i. Knowing how much opposition there is to the project’s design, I am somewhat surprised that this remains a difficult decision for you. From what I understand of your logic, you feel that you, alone, know what is good for me. When you tell people, “Be careful what you wish for …” are you inferring that we don’t know what we are asking? To the contrary I do understand the ramifications of asking that Stock respect the existing C-3 zoning, but I am asking you to vote to deny his proposed amendment to the Growth Management Plan. I cannot be more direct. You have for too long and too frequently voted to allow developers to run slipshod over the wishes of your taxpaying constituents. If it is too challenging to stop may I politely suggest resignation? I will be there on March 1st to hold your feet to the fire. Sincerely, Kent L Pietsch Sea Chase #602 __________________________ --------------------- From:annie dezio To:McDanielBill Subject:Stock"s Done Deal Commercial undermines faith in process Date:Wednesday, February 24, 2021 8:40:07 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: My husband & I were quite dismayed when we saw Stock's Done Deal commercial while watching the national news. My husband said: " I thought that was being decided on March 1st....guess it's a done deal?" Living in Naples Park we were never fans of the project but we genuinely & stupidly believed that our concerns mattered. At the end of the day it appears big money wins every time. I do not think I will get up early & subject myself to Covid 19 on March 1 . Why bother? (Having given up chocolate for Lent I am cranky enough). Personally I would have preferred a public park to One Naples. ~Anne Marie Dezio-Marti From:JOHN DELAROCHE To:McDanielBill Subject:Stop “Miamification” of Collier County Date:Sunday, February 28, 2021 10:47:15 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: This project will benefit only those who are building this complex and it will come at the expense of everyone who lives here, now and in the future. Please ask the developers to go make their money elsewhere. On March 1 you and your fellow Commissioners will be hearing Stock Development’s application for One Naples. I am writing you today to express my strong opposition to the development as Stock has proposed it. I know full well that this development is not in our District, and that you generally tend to vote with the Commissioner in whose District the project lies. But, in this case I ask you to act independently. Residents of Commissioner Solis’ District have overwhelmingly shown their opposition. I know that you are aware of that as I know that you have received hundreds of emails telling you so. I believe that Commissioner Solis intends to vote in support of the Stock amendment to the Growth Management Plan. His reason for doing so is flawed. He feels that the neighborhood is not capable of understanding the nuances of the matter before you, and that he, alone, know what is good for his District. When he tells people, “Be careful what you wish for.” he is saying that the residents of the affected neighborhood don’t know for what they are asking. I assure you that they do understand the ramifications of asking that Stock respect the existing C-3 zoning. One Naples is not simply a District 2 issue. It’s approval would send a message that for the Commissioners it’s “business as usual,” and the they have little concern for the “Miamification” of Collier County. It would represent the long-held pattern of the Board of County Commissioners supporting developers over neighborhoods. That must stop! I am asking you to vote to deny Stock’s proposed amendment to the Growth Management Plan. I cannot be more direct. You have for too long and for too often voted to allow developers to run slipshod over the wishes of your taxpaying constituents. __________________________ --------------------- From:Jeannette Malone To:McDanielBill Subject:stop ignoring code restrict Date:Tuesday, February 23, 2021 6:34:03 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: On March 1 you and your fellow Commissioners will be hearing Stock Development’s application for One Naples. I am writing you today to express my strong opposition to the development as Stock has proposed it. I know full well that this development is not in our District, and that you generally tend to vote with the Commissioner in whose District the project lies. But, in this case I ask you to act independently. Residents of Commissioner Solis’ District have overwhelmingly shown their opposition. I know that you are aware of that as I know that you have received hundreds of emails telling you so. I believe that Commissioner Solis intends to vote in support of the Stock amendment to the Growth Management Plan. His reason for doing so is flawed. He feels that the neighborhood is not capable of understanding the nuances of the matter before you, and that he, alone, know what is good for his District. When he tells people, “Be careful what you wish for.” he is saying that the residents of the affected neighborhood don’t know for what they are asking. I assure you that they do understand the ramifications of asking that Stock respect the existing C-3 zoning. One Naples is not simply a District 2 issue. It’s approval would send a message that for the Commissioners it’s “business as usual,” and the they have little concern for the “Miamification” of Collier County. It would represent the long-held pattern of the Board of County Commissioners supporting developers over neighborhoods. That must stop! I am asking you to vote to deny Stock’s proposed amendment to the Growth Management Plan. I cannot be more direct. You have for too long and for too often voted to allow developers to run slipshod over the wishes of your taxpaying constituents. I will be there on March 1st to hold your feet to the fire. __________________________ --------------------- From:ALAN ZISKIN To:McDanielBill Subject:Stop Naples One Date:Tuesday, February 16, 2021 3:17:48 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner, It seems this builder has gotten bigger than the people elected to protect the citizens. Please use you common sense to see what a bad idea this is and how it doesn’t serve the community or the county. Stop it Today. Alan Ziskin Pelican Bay From:Jo Ellen Schroedter To:McDanielBill Subject:STOP STOCK Date:Sunday, February 28, 2021 2:21:51 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel, Please VOTE NO to allow Stock Development to proceed with not following zoning regulations on heights of buildings. Also, it is hard to believe that such an expensive community would allow the public to bike thru their property. We should ensure that right. Will the 90-boat marina be available to all or just to those residents of the property or their rights of first refusal. Sincerely, Jo Ellen Schroedter Pelican Bay property owner From:Greg Stuart To:TaylorPenny; GrecoSherry; LoCastroRick; SaundersBurt; McDanielBill; SolisAndy; JenkinsAnita; SaboJames; Ralf Brookes; Spector, Sarah Subject:The 23 Feb. One Naples Revised Staff Conditions Date:Wednesday, February 24, 2021 6:19:56 PM Attachments:24Feb21Stuart_FinalRevisedStaffConditionsletter1.pdf EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Anita, please see attachment. Greg GREGSTUART (c) 239 677 6126 www.Stuarturbandesign.com www.GregStuartFineArt.com Both Greg Stuart and Stuart and Associates Planning and Design Services intend that this message be used exclusively by the addressee(s). This message may contain information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. Unauthorized disclosure or use of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please permanently dispose of the original message and notify Greg Stuart immediately at 239 677 6126. From:Greg Stuart To:McDanielBill Cc:Jim Cleveland; Craig A. Kasper; Buzz Victor Subject:The Gaps In The Record One Naples MPUD Brief Date:Monday, January 11, 2021 1:35:30 PM Attachments:5Dec21_DRAFT_SVBtoBOCC_BriefCoverLetter.pdf 17DecStuart_GapsInTheRecordBrief.pdf EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Good Afternoon Commissioner McDaniel: I am copying you with a brief that I discussed with and sent to Commissioner LoCastro (please see the attached brief). The brief identifies the 5 specific Collier Code items that have been omitted or inaccurately addressed by Staff and Applicant through the One Naples MPUP review process. If you are interested I am available at any time to discuss further. Good luck in your deliberations and have a great week! Greg Stuart, MAURP GREGSTUART (c) 239 677 6126 www.Stuarturbandesign.com www.GregStuartFineArt.com Both Greg Stuart and Stuart and Associates Planning and Design Services intend that this message be used exclusively by the addressee(s). This message may contain information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. Unauthorized disclosure or use of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please permanently dispose of the original message and notify Greg Stuart immediately at 239 677 6126. From:Kim Rosenberg To:SolisAndy; SaundersBurt; TaylorPenny; McDanielBill; LoCastroRick Subject:The Negative Impact of One Naples on Beach Access for the Public at Vanderbilt Beach and Clam Pass Park Date:Sunday, February 28, 2021 8:58:16 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioners: The approval of One Naples will have a highly deleterious effect on beach access for the inland population of Collier County. Consider 172 units occupied by the very rich immediately across from Vanderbilt Beach. During peak weeks, such as Thanksgiving, Christmas, Easter, Presidents Birthdays, those residents and their family guests could add as many as 500 - 800 people to the crowd at Vanderbilt Beach. Next door, the expansion of the Ritz will convert 100 rooms to suites and add 24 new suites, creating the potential for another 200 beachgoers. All these people will get to the beach before inland residents from Naples Park, Pelican Marsh, the Quarry, Golden Gate, Immokolee, etc., effectively displacing the working and middle class of Collier County. Is this a consequence you are prepared to address in the future? It's also worth noting that the recently proposed Clam Pass garage, at I believe an estimated cost of $8 million, would have added about 200 parking spaces and hence provided access to about 1000 more residents. So by approving One Naples you would create the need to spend $8 million just to recover the lost beach capacity. Such an expansion was opposed by environmentalists, numerous Pelican Bay neighborhoods and businesses, and Park Shore residents, but the Pelican Bay Board, whose approval is necessary, was willing to give the proposal a fair hearing given the importance of beach access for the general public in Collier County. Please know that as a current Director of the Pelican Bay Foundation and speaking solely for myself, I would find it difficult to support a garage in Clam Pass Park as the answer to a self inflicted beach capacity shortage created solely by your approval of One Naples. I would also do my best to convince my fellow Directors to adopt a similar view. Please, as you consider One Naples, remember the inland population of Collier County, and respect their need for beach access rather than the interests of a private developer seeking excessive gains at the expense of all concerned. Kim Rosenberg 8665 Bay Colony Dr. Apt 1603 Naples, FL 34108 From:Greg Stuart To:TaylorPenny; McDanielBill; LoCastroRick; SaundersBurt; SolisAndy Cc:JenkinsAnita; SaboJames Subject:The Staff One Naples Minimal Recommended Conditions Clawback Date:Thursday, February 25, 2021 3:04:06 PM Attachments:Screen Shot 2021-02-25 at 2.56.04 PM.png EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Madam Chairwoman, As a follow up to yesterday's email, please refer to Mr. Sabo's transcript from October's hearing. That is what the BOCC should expect from staff, to do what is best for the community. Staff should not mis-interprete the LDC and back off from commitments made to the public in favor of one developer that is complaining that the October staff conditions do not advance his interests. GREGSTUART (c) 239 677 6126 www.Stuarturbandesign.com www.GregStuartFineArt.com Both Greg Stuart and Stuart and Associates Planning and Design Services intend that this message be used exclusively by the addressee(s). This message may contain information that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. Unauthorized disclosure or use of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please permanently dispose of the original message and notify Greg Stuart immediately at 239 677 6126. From:Cheryl Speers To:McDanielBill Subject:Today’s vote Date:Monday, March 1, 2021 8:40:06 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Today’s vote was not the will of the people especially those in district 2. I will campaign against you every day of the rest of my life. Cheryl Speers Sent from my iPhone From:Mail Delivery System To:rgdirect@sbcglobal.net Subject:Undeliverable: I oppose the One Naples application Date:Sunday, February 28, 2021 3:50:01 PM Attachments:RE I oppose the One Naples application.msg Delivery has failed to these recipients or groups: rgdirect@sbcglobal.net <mailto:rgdirect@sbcglobal.net> A problem occurred while delivering this message to this email address. Try sending this message again. If the problem continues, please contact your helpdesk. The following organization rejected your message: [144.160.159.22]. Diagnostic information for administrators: Generating server: mail2.colliergov.net rgdirect@sbcglobal.net [144.160.159.22] Remote Server returned '<[144.160.159.22] #5.0.0 smtp; 5.1.0 - Unknown address error 550-'5.7.1 Connections not accepted from servers without a valid sender domain.flph835 Fix reverse DNS for 76.7.93.102' (delivery attempts: 0)>' Original message headers: X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.81,214,1610427600"; d="png'150?scan'150,208,150";a="30779192" X-Amp-Result: UNKNOWN X-Amp-Original-Verdict: FILE UNKNOWN X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False X-IronPort-DK-Sig: BCCDKIM-colliercountyfl Received: from unknown (HELO BCCEX01f.bcc.colliergov.net) ([10.10.164.251]) by ironport2.colliergov.net with ESMTP/TLS/AES256-SHA; 28 Feb 2021 15:49:59 -0500 Received: from bccex01f.bcc.colliergov.net (10.10.164.251) by BCCEX01f.bcc.colliergov.net (10.10.164.251) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Sun, 28 Feb 2021 15:49:59 -0500 Received: from bccex01f.bcc.colliergov.net ([fe80::d0eb:aa65:9fb7:6657]) by BCCEX01f.bcc.colliergov.net ([fe80::d0eb:aa65:9fb7:6657%12]) with mapi id 15.00.1497.010; Sun, 28 Feb 2021 15:49:59 -0500 From: McDanielBill <Bill.McDaniel@colliercountyfl.gov> To: "rgdirect@sbcglobal.net" <rgdirect@sbcglobal.net> Subject: RE: I oppose the One Naples application Thread-Topic: RE: I oppose the One Naples application Thread-Index: AdcOE0TCwYYf+iJSQrKFV6Bo44FSYw== Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2021 20:49:59 +0000 Message-ID: <ac6b38cbb2424c0dbbad9c8cfaebd0a2@BCCEX01f.bcc.colliergov.net> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: yes X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted x-originating-ip: [10.4.1.20] Content-Type: multipart/related; boundary="_002_ac6b38cbb2424c0dbbad9c8cfaebd0a2BCCEX01fbcccolliergovne_"; type="text/plain" MIME-Version: 1.0 From:Mail Delivery System To:sfiterman@mac.co Subject:Undeliverable: ONE NAPLES Date:Thursday, September 24, 2020 12:10:30 PM Attachments:RE ONE NAPLES.msg Delivery has failed to these recipients or groups: sfiterman@mac.co <mailto:sfiterman@mac.co> A problem occurred while delivering this message to this email address. Try sending this message again. If the problem continues, please contact your helpdesk. Diagnostic information for administrators: Generating server: ironport.colliergov.net sfiterman@mac.co Remote Server returned '< #5.0.0 smtp; 5.4.7 - Delivery expired (message too old) 'timeout' (delivery attempts: 0)>' Original message headers: X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.77,297,1596513600"; d="jpg'145?png'145,150?scan'145,150,208,217,150,145";a="64467885" X-Amp-Result: UNKNOWN X-Amp-Original-Verdict: FILE UNKNOWN X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False X-IronPort-DK-Sig: BCCDKIM-colliercountyfl Received: from unknown (HELO BCCEX03e.bcc.colliergov.net) ([10.20.164.253]) by ironport.colliergov.net with ESMTP; 24 Sep 2020 07:14:29 -0400 Received: from bccex01e.bcc.colliergov.net (10.20.164.251) by BCCEX03e.bcc.colliergov.net (10.20.164.253) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 07:14:25 -0400 Received: from bccex01e.bcc.colliergov.net ([fe80::4d67:6dea:28f0:d92b]) by BCCEX01E.bcc.colliergov.net ([fe80::4d67:6dea:28f0:d92b%12]) with mapi id 15.00.1497.006; Thu, 24 Sep 2020 07:14:25 -0400 From: McDanielBill <Bill.McDaniel@colliercountyfl.gov> To: "sfiterman@mac.co" <sfiterman@mac.co> Subject: RE: ONE NAPLES Thread-Topic: ONE NAPLES Thread-Index: AQHWke8bvv+x8UG00E+5BYCPotG9OKl3o8Bg Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2020 11:14:25 +0000 Message-ID: <2ad4eff8c15b4ca5abd3f4d46233dcc0@BCCEX01E.bcc.colliergov.net> References: <cc6e393851e4538823f107de6e8638cf@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <cc6e393851e4538823f107de6e8638cf@localhost.localdomain> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: yes X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1 x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted x-originating-ip: [10.4.1.20] Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 From:Mail Delivery System To:patti@theleoplds.net Subject:Undeliverable: ONE NAPLES Date:Sunday, September 20, 2020 2:57:35 PM Attachments:RE ONE NAPLES.msg Delivery has failed to these recipients or groups: patti@theleoplds.net <mailto:patti@theleoplds.net> A problem occurred while delivering this message to this email address. Try sending this message again. If the problem continues, please contact your helpdesk. Diagnostic information for administrators: Generating server: ironport.colliergov.net patti@theleoplds.net Remote Server returned '< #5.0.0 smtp; 5.1.2 - Bad destination host 'DNS Hard Error looking up theleoplds.net (MX): NXDomain' (delivery attempts: 0)>' Original message headers: X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.77,283,1596513600"; d="jpg'145?png'145,150?scan'145,150,208,217,150,145";a="64326297" X-Amp-Result: UNKNOWN X-Amp-Original-Verdict: FILE UNKNOWN X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False X-IronPort-DK-Sig: BCCDKIM-colliercountyfl Received: from unknown (HELO BCCEX02e.bcc.colliergov.net) ([10.20.164.252]) by ironport.colliergov.net with ESMTP; 20 Sep 2020 14:32:53 -0400 Received: from bccex01e.bcc.colliergov.net (10.20.164.251) by BCCEX02e.bcc.colliergov.net (10.20.164.252) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Sun, 20 Sep 2020 14:32:53 -0400 Received: from bccex01e.bcc.colliergov.net ([fe80::4d67:6dea:28f0:d92b]) by BCCEX01E.bcc.colliergov.net ([fe80::4d67:6dea:28f0:d92b%12]) with mapi id 15.00.1497.006; Sun, 20 Sep 2020 14:32:53 -0400 From: McDanielBill <Bill.McDaniel@colliercountyfl.gov> To: "patti@theleoplds.net" <patti@theleoplds.net> Subject: RE: ONE NAPLES Thread-Topic: ONE NAPLES Thread-Index: AQHWjqIw+cBoaAgaRqazCyXCzEEg4alx25fw Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2020 18:32:53 +0000 Message-ID: <1f2845887bef4512984fe826f44a0eb8@BCCEX01E.bcc.colliergov.net> References: <65af7d9070821ce2064f09637a4a8c66@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <65af7d9070821ce2064f09637a4a8c66@localhost.localdomain> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: yes X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1 x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted x-originating-ip: [10.4.1.20] Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 From:Mail Delivery System To:rolf.endner@t-online.de Subject:Undeliverable: ONE NAPLES Date:Wednesday, August 26, 2020 12:53:16 PM Attachments:RE ONE NAPLES.msg Delivery has failed to these recipients or groups: rolf.endner@t-online.de <mailto:rolf.endner@t-online.de> A problem occurred while delivering this message to this email address. Try sending this message again. If the problem continues, please contact your helpdesk. Diagnostic information for administrators: Generating server: ironport2.colliergov.net rolf.endner@t-online.de Remote Server returned '< #5.0.0 smtp; 5.4.7 - Delivery expired (message too old) 554-'IP=76.7.93.102 - A problem occurred. (Ask your postmaster for help or to contact tosa@rx.t-online.de to clarify.) (BL)' (delivery attempts: 0)>' Original message headers: X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.76,355,1592884800"; d="png'150?scan'150,208,217,150";a="25088770" X-Amp-Result: UNKNOWN X-Amp-Original-Verdict: FILE UNKNOWN X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False X-IronPort-DK-Sig: BCCDKIM-colliercountyfl Received: from unknown (HELO BCCEX02e.bcc.colliergov.net) ([10.20.164.252]) by ironport2.colliergov.net with ESMTP; 26 Aug 2020 08:23:32 -0400 Received: from bccex01e.bcc.colliergov.net (10.20.164.251) by BCCEX02e.bcc.colliergov.net (10.20.164.252) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Wed, 26 Aug 2020 08:23:32 -0400 Received: from bccex01e.bcc.colliergov.net ([fe80::4d67:6dea:28f0:d92b]) by BCCEX01E.bcc.colliergov.net ([fe80::4d67:6dea:28f0:d92b%12]) with mapi id 15.00.1497.006; Wed, 26 Aug 2020 08:23:32 -0400 From: McDanielBill <Bill.McDaniel@colliercountyfl.gov> To: "rolf.endner@t-online.de" <rolf.endner@t-online.de> Subject: RE: ONE NAPLES Thread-Topic: ONE NAPLES Thread-Index: AQHWe59utGjpEqqaxkuVwHqXYJxgnalKUA3A Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2020 12:23:32 +0000 Message-ID: <97f159690857411ba2a5d1a59ea4194e@BCCEX01E.bcc.colliergov.net> References: <ac4a18c28bedebfaabc1066833de51cb@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <ac4a18c28bedebfaabc1066833de51cb@localhost.localdomain> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: yes X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1 x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted x-originating-ip: [10.4.1.20] Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 From:Mail Delivery System To:sueklevell@yshoo.com Subject:Undeliverable: ONE NAPLES Date:Saturday, October 17, 2020 7:44:32 PM Attachments:Re ONE NAPLES.msg Delivery has failed to these recipients or groups: sueklevell@yshoo.com <mailto:sueklevell@yshoo.com> A problem occurred while delivering this message to this email address. Try sending this message again. If the problem continues, please contact your helpdesk. Diagnostic information for administrators: Generating server: ironport2.colliergov.net sueklevell@yshoo.com Remote Server returned '< #5.0.0 smtp; 5.4.7 - Delivery expired (message too old) 'timeout' (delivery attempts: 0)>' Original message headers: X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.77,387,1596513600"; d="png'150?scan'150,208,150";a="26988613" X-Amp-Result: UNKNOWN X-Amp-Original-Verdict: FILE UNKNOWN X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False X-IronPort-DK-Sig: BCCDKIM-colliercountyfl Received: from unknown (HELO BCCEX01E.bcc.colliergov.net) ([10.20.164.251]) by ironport2.colliergov.net with ESMTP; 17 Oct 2020 15:33:16 -0400 Received: from bccex01e.bcc.colliergov.net (10.20.164.251) by BCCEX01E.bcc.colliergov.net (10.20.164.251) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Sat, 17 Oct 2020 15:33:16 -0400 Received: from bccex01e.bcc.colliergov.net ([fe80::4d67:6dea:28f0:d92b]) by BCCEX01E.bcc.colliergov.net ([fe80::4d67:6dea:28f0:d92b%12]) with mapi id 15.00.1497.006; Sat, 17 Oct 2020 15:33:16 -0400 From: McDanielBill <Bill.McDaniel@colliercountyfl.gov> To: "sueklevell@yshoo.com" <sueklevell@yshoo.com> Subject: Re: ONE NAPLES Thread-Topic: ONE NAPLES Thread-Index: AQHWpJGpT8BLHTZjhUG571gLrcTcyKmcL5Xe Date: Sat, 17 Oct 2020 19:33:16 +0000 Message-ID: <25B5E1B5-74F8-424A-8818-A8EDCF423F96@colliercountyfl.gov> References: <ecb198f6e087ec3f0e1471766a2bc06a@localhost.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <ecb198f6e087ec3f0e1471766a2bc06a@localhost.localdomain> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: yes X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 From:Mail Delivery System To:outlook_862FEFBB4B4058FB@outlook.com Subject:Undeliverable: One Naples Date:Tuesday, February 9, 2021 9:34:50 AM Attachments:RE One Naples.msg Delivery has failed to these recipients or groups: outlook_862FEFBB4B4058FB@outlook.com <mailto:outlook_862FEFBB4B4058FB@outlook.com> A problem occurred while delivering this message to this email address. Try sending this message again. If the problem continues, please contact your helpdesk. The following organization rejected your message: [104.47.58.161]. Diagnostic information for administrators: Generating server: mail.colliergov.net outlook_862FEFBB4B4058FB@outlook.com [104.47.58.161] Remote Server returned '<[104.47.58.161] #5.0.0 smtp; 5.1.0 - Unknown address error 550-'5.5.0 Requested action not taken: mailbox unavailable (S2017062302). [BN8NAM11FT039.eop-nam11.prod.protection.outlook.com]' (delivery attempts: 0)>' Original message headers: X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.81,165,1610427600"; d="png'150?scan'150,208,217,150";a="68602555" X-Amp-Result: UNKNOWN X-Amp-Original-Verdict: FILE UNKNOWN X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False X-IronPort-DK-Sig: BCCDKIM-colliercountyfl Received: from unknown (HELO BCCEX02f.bcc.colliergov.net) ([10.10.164.252]) by ironport.colliergov.net with ESMTP; 09 Feb 2021 09:32:47 -0500 Received: from bccex01f.bcc.colliergov.net (10.10.164.251) by BCCEX02f.bcc.colliergov.net (10.10.164.252) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Tue, 9 Feb 2021 09:32:46 -0500 Received: from bccex01f.bcc.colliergov.net ([fe80::d0eb:aa65:9fb7:6657]) by BCCEX01f.bcc.colliergov.net ([fe80::d0eb:aa65:9fb7:6657%12]) with mapi id 15.00.1497.010; Tue, 9 Feb 2021 09:32:46 -0500 From: McDanielBill <Bill.McDaniel@colliercountyfl.gov> To: Martin Baecker <outlook_862FEFBB4B4058FB@outlook.com> Subject: RE: One Naples Thread-Topic: One Naples Thread-Index: AQHW/usqOcKOEvFnUU+uD1IT0w2ZEqpP4thw Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2021 14:32:46 +0000 Message-ID: <61ada7ea04454ebd93166e00dfac5028@BCCEX01f.bcc.colliergov.net> References: <BN6PR14MB1603410B4B1B1F56988BB941E88E9@BN6PR14MB1603.namprd14.prod.outlook.com> In-Reply-To: <BN6PR14MB1603410B4B1B1F56988BB941E88E9@BN6PR14MB1603.namprd14.prod.outlook.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: yes X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1 x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted x-originating-ip: [10.4.1.20] Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 From:Mail Delivery System To:nobody@earthlink.net Subject:Undeliverable: RE: ONE NAPLES Date:Friday, September 18, 2020 7:31:47 AM Attachments:RE RE ONE NAPLES.msg Delivery has failed to these recipients or groups: nobody@earthlink.net <mailto:nobody@earthlink.net> A problem occurred while delivering this message to this email address. Try sending this message again. If the problem continues, please contact your helpdesk. The following organization rejected your message: [51.81.57.58]. Diagnostic information for administrators: Generating server: mail2.colliergov.net nobody@earthlink.net [51.81.57.58] Remote Server returned '<[51.81.57.58] #5.0.0 smtp; 5.1.0 - Unknown address error 550-'5.7.1 Connection refused - OXSUS0001_403' (delivery attempts: 0)>' Original message headers: X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.77,274,1596513600"; d="png'150?scan'150,208,217,150";a="26043880" X-Amp-Result: UNKNOWN X-Amp-Original-Verdict: FILE UNKNOWN X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False X-IronPort-DK-Sig: BCCDKIM-colliercountyfl Received: from unknown (HELO BCCEX01E.bcc.colliergov.net) ([10.20.164.251]) by ironport2.colliergov.net with ESMTP; 18 Sep 2020 07:30:07 -0400 Received: from bccex01e.bcc.colliergov.net (10.20.164.251) by BCCEX01E.bcc.colliergov.net (10.20.164.251) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 07:30:06 -0400 Received: from bccex01e.bcc.colliergov.net ([fe80::4d67:6dea:28f0:d92b]) by BCCEX01E.bcc.colliergov.net ([fe80::4d67:6dea:28f0:d92b%12]) with mapi id 15.00.1497.006; Fri, 18 Sep 2020 07:30:06 -0400 From: McDanielBill <Bill.McDaniel@colliercountyfl.gov> To: "nobody@earthlink.net" <nobody@earthlink.net> Subject: RE: RE: ONE NAPLES Thread-Topic: RE: ONE NAPLES Thread-Index: AQHWja5eAE4F3Pu2qEKhzjJGnxUagKluQrHg Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2020 11:30:06 +0000 Message-ID: <2362c168b2814735b52fe3b0ae20c341@BCCEX01E.bcc.colliergov.net> References: <e2a69387f7bb43cb9a19511bd9dd959c@BCCEX03e.bcc.colliergov.net> In-Reply-To: <e2a69387f7bb43cb9a19511bd9dd959c@BCCEX03e.bcc.colliergov.net> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: yes X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1 x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted x-originating-ip: [10.4.1.20] Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 From:Scott Zumstein To:SolisAndy; burt.sanders@colliercountyfl.gov; McDanielBill; TaylorPenny; donna.fiala@colliercountyfl.gov; jeff.klatzlow@colliercountyfl.gov Cc:scott@zumsteins.com; Ken Oehler; dnet95@gmail.com; cahendriks@comcast.net; "Mike Dilley"; "Ted Norris"; awilli9412@aol.com; info@captainsforcleanwater.org; max.chesnes@tcpalm.com; info@calusawaterkeeper.org; robm@conservancy.org; ConservationCollier; info@evergladesfoundation.org; brent.batten@naplesnews.com; investigations@winknews.com; awilliams@news-press.com; patrick.riley@naplesnews.com; kschneider@gannett.com Subject:Urgent-Commissioners toxic dump Date:Tuesday, February 9, 2021 10:44:37 AM Attachments:RE Urgent-Commissioners toxic dump.msg SWFWM & SFWM, C.C. Commissioners, Let’s call it what it is. Not pumping but dumping! Let’s identify what’s being dumped. Storm water is a kind term. How about toxic, dangerous, life, wild life and environment destroying sludge water. Flooded businesses, homes, garages and sheds off gassing, flooded septic tanks/field with fecal matter, flooded vehicles with oils and fuels, dead decaying animals all with a variety of pesticides, herbicides and fertilizers mixed in. As Erin Brockovich once stated “go ahead, I had that brought in especially for you”. There are thousands if not tens of thousands of Collier County tax paying citizens living, and supposedly enjoying their water front access, all along the water ways you want to toxic dump into. Waterways effected by toxic dumping; Coco Canal, Cocohatchee River, The Palm River, Wiggins Pass, North Channel to Imperial River and Estero Bay, South Channel to Turkey Bay and all the surrounding estuaries. Just to name a few. You cannot control where it goes. Home communities and Condo Towers effected by toxic dumping; Palm River, Horse Creek and Willoughby Acres (et al), Colliers Reserve, Gulf Harbor, Pelican Isle Yacht Club, Aqua, Kalea Bay, Marina Bay Club, The Dunes, Audubon Country Club, Wiggins Bay Club, Tarpon Cove, Wiggins Lake, The Old Florida Golf Club, All of Connors neighborhood off Vanderbilt Dr and all condo towers on Gulf Shore Dr. and lastly, but probably missed a few, the proposed (hopefully not) One Naples by Stock Development. State and Collier County Parks effected by toxic dumping; Delnor-Wiggins Pass State Park and Collier County’s Lely Barefoot Beach. Both of the parks have inland estuaries. The immediate concern; You are violating your own disclosure and notification protocals. Have you notified all the citizens in these communities? Are you willing to go against these communities concerns of clean water and safe environments? Are you willing to pollute the quality of life of the neighborhood citizens and families? Are you willing to drive down property equites and values with a toxic dump? Concerned for a quality of life, Scott Zumstein scott@zumsteins.com 239-860-9025 cell Scott Thanks for keeping me in the loop Pumps - when I read 'pumps' Quail West immediately came to mind. Quail West has illegally used pumps to divert flood waters from their golf course; I say illegally, because they were fined for taking that action; they paid the fine, apparently because they were of the opinion that it would be less money than repairing their flooded golf course. One would think that the flood waters would flow SW everywhere south of Bonita Beach Road; perhaps not, as pumps were need to move the water to where it would naturally flow away from their golf course; maybe there are lands south of Bonita Beach Road that are 'naturally' part of the Imperial River Drainage Basin?? One can bet that the powerhouse golf/gated developments along Immokalee Road, including Quail Creek, Quail West and Grey Oaks are players in this unfolding 'who gets the flood waters' drama. The water that we are all trying to deal with, wants to move South and West. The Imperial River Basin has always flooded, and Lee County has done a miserable job of managing the development of the Bonita Springs area; they want the problem to be someone else's. Couple that with Collier County's desire/need to ever expand the Sanitary Treatment Facilities on Goodlette - Frank Road, and you have what to me at least, is a clear motive for the continued proposals to divert the flood waters into the Cocohatchee River; the golf/gated communities are in lock-step with whatever proposal routes the water away from them. IMHO the water wants to predominantly flow South to Picayune Strand, Fakahatchee Strand and to Big Cypress. There is a Coastal Ridge on both coasts of Florida that funnels the water South into Florida Bay. The Coastal Rivers that, in our case, flow West are diminutive and are incapable of handling the water that careless development has diverted into them, and proposes to divert into them. Once more, we are banging our heads against nature _ that never works out good. From: Ken [mailto:kenoehler@comcast.net] Sent: Monday, February 8, 2021 5:58 PM To: Scott Zumstein <scott@zumsteins.com> Subject: Fwd: Big Cypress Basin Scott You may already be aware that the state sfwmd is in effect backfiring Bonita springs attempt to send their flood waters to Palm River and Cocohatchee River and on to your waters. Here is an email Danette huff who lives on sharwood sent to commissioners. I will send a similar but less lengthy demanding they prevent this from happy. Let Lee county solve its own flooding problem. Ken Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: Danette Huff <dnet95@gmail.com> Date: February 8, 2021 at 5:51:38 PM EST To: Ken <kenoehler@comcast.net> Subject: Fwd: Big Cypress Basin Hi Ken, here is the email address for Saunders. Burt.Saunders@CollierCountyFL.Gov Please give me a call if you have any questions. 239-595-5610 ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Danette <dnet95@gmail.com> Date: Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 4:58 PM Subject: Fwd: Big Cypress Basin To: Ken <kenoehler@comcast.net> Hi Ken, Here is the email I sent to Craig-the attachment has the language. I will send you Comm. Saunders email when I get a minute. Thank you, Danettep Sent from my iPhone Begin forwarded message: From: Danette Huff <dnet95@gmail.com> Date: February 8, 2021 at 2:51:22 PM EST To: Craig Hendriks <cahendriks@comcast.net> Subject: Big Cypress Basin Craig, The attached document has the language. Subject: Item 11 D Big Cypress Basin (BCB) Boundary Expansion Commissioners, First of all, thank you Commissioner Taylor for recalling this item. An expansion of the Big Cypress Basin has no benefit to Collier County. It will negatively impact a large portion of North Naples residents. This bill opens the door to diversion of water from Lee County down through Collier County, specifically to the Immokalee Road Canal and out into the sensitive Cocohatchee River Estuary and into Wiggins Bay which is an Outstanding Florida Waterbody. Regardless of how this is being presented, if you are familiar with the history it’s obvious that moving water south from Lee County into Collier County is the ultimate goal of this bill. Palm River, Cocohatchee River Estates, the Bay House, and Colliers Reserve had a meeting with Big Cypress Basin and County staff about this two years ago. Residents had a lot of questions and very few answers were provided. We were promised this wouldn’t move forward until our questions were answered and there were assurances that water wouldn’t be moved south or if it was, it wouldn’t affect our properties. Our trust was rewarded with a bill being pushed through via a budget document and no discussion with the stakeholders. The term “scientific” is being used very loosely. While this may have been valid pre-development, it is no longer the way water flows in the existing built environment. Although SFWMD states they reviewed existing permits, the reality doesn’t reflect their study results. If you need evidence, look at the pumps that would have been required for the Bonita diversion project. If water flowed that way naturally, a pump wouldn’t be required. You may recall a former SFWMD board member used the term “shared adversity” when he spoke of taking the flood water from Bonita Springs and pumping it south to the Immokalee Road Canal out to the Cocohatchee River and Estuary. The term “shared adversity” was used to describe the damage from flooding the Bonita stormwater would cause in residential areas such as Palm River, Collier’s Reserve, Horse Creek, and Cocohatchee River Estates. He spoke specifically of lessening the duration of flooding for a few hundred houses in Bonita Springs by flooding some homes in Palm River. While I sympathize with the residents of Bonita Springs, I object to becoming the affected area as we purchased our property in good faith after doing our due diligence about stormwater management. Regulations for stormwater design criteria were created and development was permitted, inspected, and approved by the SFWMD and Lee County and other government agencies. It is unrealistic to expect that the Collier County property owners calmly accept that their properties will now flood or at best, be de-valued due to government agencies that acted in bad faith, allowing areas of Lee County to be overdeveloped to the point of flooding. The burden of Lee County’s and/or municipalities Growth Management Divisions and SFWMD’s failure to plan sufficiently; allow development to go beyond what their stormwater management system can handle; or meet their concurrency requirements should not be placed on our shoulders and flood us out of our homes or drive our property values down. Before you provide support to this bill, could you please answer the following questions? If you are unable to answer them, could you please actively work to ensure this bill is not passed until answers are provided? 1. There is not enough capacity in Collier County’s existing stormwater management system as evidenced by existing flooding events. The existing stormwater management system infrastructure is also failing. What is being done to address those issues as well as meet the challenges of sea level rise? What are the costs of those improvements? I recall a stormwater funding issue that was attempted to be addressed in the form of a stormwater utility that failed. Why would you add stormwater from another County when stormwater management issues aren’t able to be appropriately funded here? 2. Collier County is already struggling with water quality, 36% of Collier County watersheds are impaired, including the Cocohatchee River watershed. Polluted stormwater runoff is causing algae blooms and other issues in stormwater ponds, in the canals, the estuaries and in the Gulf of Mexico. Some of the algae blooms give off toxins of which very little is known about the potential adverse health effects. Allowing more stormwater will make it worse. How would you require Lee County to treat their water before it is allowed to be shipped south? How would you be able to mandate and ensure treatment is working? What are those costs? Or conversely, how much will that treatment and monitoring cost Collier County residents? 3. Water management issues will continue to worsen due to sea level rise. The areas that would be required to share the adversity are adjacent to a tidal waterbody. As sea level rise is making these properties vulnerable to repeated inundation, why would you allow the addition of water from another county to worsen Collier County property owners’ situations? 4. How are you assuring Collier County’s stormwater management system is concurrent? 5. Have the areas downstream of the primary water management system been modeled? Why take on additional water without knowing if there is capacity or if the system is concurrent? 6. What are the impacts from the addition of Bonita National stormwater? 7. What assurances do we have that no negative impacts to our properties will result from this boundary expansion? We know that this bill is the first step in moving water south from Lee County to Collier County to alleviate flooding in Lee County. In addition to all of these unanswered questions and there is a huge negative impact to Collier County residents, I can’t imagine why you would support the expansion of the Big Cypress Basin Boundary. I can only hope that you will actively work to make sure the bill doesn’t pass. Please, as our representatives, speak for us as if it were your home being threatened. From:Bob Mendelsohn To:SolisAndy; rick.locastro@colliercounty.gov; burt.saunders@colliercountyfl.giv; penny.tsylor@collierciuntyfl.gov; McDanielBill Subject:Vanderbilt and Stock Developers. Date:Monday, March 1, 2021 10:29:11 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Please don't allow Stock any more code variances regarding the Vanderbilt site. It will add nothing to the value, utility or beauty of the area. Hold their feet to the fire! Lynne Mendelsohn 661 Mainsail Pl. Naples From:T Campbell To:SaundersBurt; SolisAndy; TaylorPenny; McDanielBill; Rick LoCastro; info@savevanderbiltbeach.com Subject:Vanderbilt beach development monday vote Date:Sunday, February 28, 2021 8:22:26 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Are you going to ignore the residents' voices and continue turning Naples into an overcrowded unlivable big city like Miami? https://nbc-2.com/news/local/2021/02/27/group-protests-one- naples-development-ahead-of-commissioners-vote/ Theresa Collier resident From:Ronald Cereoli To:McDanielBill Subject:Vanderbilt beach Date:Monday, March 1, 2021 10:55:43 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Please vote to end this huge building plan for our beautiful beach !!!!! So crowded already on Vsnderbikt road will be impossible !!! Thank you Ron and Doreen Cereoli Residents North Naples. Sent from my iPhone From:Louise To:McDanielBill Subject:Vanderbilt Beach Date:Tuesday, February 9, 2021 4:21:12 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Hi I am writing to urge you to vote against the Stock Development who are proposing a huge high-rise project at the intersection of Vanderbilt Beach Road and Gulf Shore Drive called One Naples. This is not what Naples needs and goes against all current regulations that were set for a reason. Live, hope, learn! Louise Pearson 5580 Cynthia Lane Naples 34112 From:Clark Price To:McDanielBill Subject:Vanderbilt Development Application Date:Monday, February 15, 2021 9:49:29 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: On March 1 you and your fellow Commissioners will be hearing Stock Development’s application for One Naples. I am writing you today to express my strong opposition to the development as Stock has proposed it. I know full well that this development is not in our District, and that you generally tend to vote with the Commissioner in whose District the project lies. But, in this case I ask you to act independently. Residents of Commissioner Solis’ District have overwhelmingly shown their opposition. I know that you are aware of that as I know that you have received hundreds of emails telling you so. I believe that Commissioner Solis intends to vote in support of the Stock amendment to the Growth Management Plan. One Naples is not simply a District 2 issue. It’s approval would send a message that for the Commissioners it’s “business as usual,” and the they have little concern for the “Miamification” of Collier County. It would represent the long-held pattern of the Board of County Commissioners supporting developers over neighborhoods. That must stop! I am asking you to vote to deny Stock’s proposed amendment to the Growth Management Plan. Clark Price_________________________ --------------------- From:Kay Soltysiak To:McDanielBill Subject:Vanderbilt Neighborhood - Action Requested Date:Sunday, February 21, 2021 9:31:09 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: On March 1 you and your fellow Commissioners will be hearing Stock Development’s application for One Naples. We are writing you today to express the Lugano Village Homeowner Association's strongest opposition to the development as Stock has proposed it. We recognize that this development is not in your District, and that Commissioners generally tend to vote with the Commissioner in whose District the project lies – in this case District 2 and Commissioner’s Solis’s District. However, in this case we ask you to have the courage to act independently. As you are aware, residents of Commissioner Solis’ District have overwhelmingly shown their opposition. One Naples is not simply a District 2 issue. Its approval would send a message that it’s “business as usual,” and that the overbuilding of Collier County will continue until we are a replica of the East Coast of Florida. That must stop. We have invested our livelihoods in our property on the gulf coast of Florida and wish it to remain that way. We are asking you to vote to deny Stock’s proposed amendment to the Growth Management Plan. Respectfully, Kay Soltysiak President of the Board, Lugano Village Homeowners Association, Pelican Bay Kay.soltysiak@gmail. From:MAUREEN GAMBOCURTA To:McDanielBill Subject:Vanderbilt neighborhood - One Naples Date:Monday, February 8, 2021 12:32:08 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: I am writing today in my continued opposition to the One Naples project as proposed. I understand that, at a recent special meeting of the Commissioners, a decision was made to hold the March 1st hearing at the Commissioners’ chamber in the County office building. Because of the COVID-19 virus, and the social distancing it requires, this venue is not conducive to the very large turnout by all those who have an opinion about One Naples, pro or con. I hope that you and your fellow Commissioners will reconsider. Better locations might include St John the Evangelist Church, North Collier County Regional Park, a Collier County School auditorium, or even the Phil at Artis. Thank you for your consideration. Maureen Gambocurta __________________________ --------------------- From:Anne Eckhart To:McDanielBill Subject:Vanderbilt neighborhood -- One Naples Date:Tuesday, January 5, 2021 9:57:00 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: I have been an owner of a condominium at the Regatta at Vanderbilt Beach since 2004. I purchased in the Regatta because I loved the location and the low key neighborhood. The area was not over developed with high rises and had a really local, non-touristy feel to it. The beach was pristine and sparsely occupied even in February and March. But if you have been to Vanderbilt Beach at any time in the last couple of years then you know that (due to the addition of the public parking garage) it is completely overcrowded every single day of the week, even in the off season. It is often difficult to find a spot where others are not right on top of you. People are sitting so close to each other that you might as well be vacationing together. Frankly, with the current state of the beach, I am truly surprised that Stock wants to build this many high end condos overlooking a beach so crowded that million dollar buyers would probably not even want to go there themselves, much less take their guests there. Nevertheless, they are moving forward. This project is so disproportionate to the surrounding area. It is in no way comparable to the Pelican Bay planned development and should not be considered in that light. The negative and lasting impact on the area would be irrecoverable. The precedent this would set for all of Vanderbilt Beach (and for Collier County) would be horrendous. What would stop developers from over building on the rest of Vanderbilt Beach if this development is approved. The snowball effect could not be stopped. There is a reason the County has development standards in place — to promote reasonable development that is compatible with its surroundings. If the county code and standards are to be ignored, then why do they exist? Certainly, as an owner in the Vanderbilt neighborhood, I never thought a development of such disproportionate scale and magnitude could come to us. That's one reason I chose this neighborhood. Please protect the integrity of Vanderbilt Beach and don't allow this project to open the flood gates of over development in this area. In hopes of a more reasonable project, I am respectfully, Anne E. Eckhart, Esq. __________________________ --------------------- From:Kathryn McCaffery To:McDanielBill Subject:Vanderbilt neighborhood , Beachwalk Date:Sunday, January 3, 2021 8:28:51 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: I am writing you today to express my opposition to the Stock Development One Naples as it is currently proposed. I was encouraged by the action of the Planning Commission and their inability to recommend approval not only of the current Stock plan, but of a watered-down version that reduced the outrageous tower heights by almost 25%, and extremely diminished setbacks. They did their job, protecting the community. Now it’s your turn. Planning Commissioner Frye said it best when he asked the other Commissioners how they could ignore the outpouring of sentiment from the community. These are your constituents, your voters. Isn’t it your responsibility to listen to those who will live with this atrocity for decades to come and to vehemently deny the developer the right to build it? If hundreds of emails exhorting you to deny the project are not enough, if more than eighty people who signed up to speak against the project at the Planning Commission are not enough, if the 1,100 members of Save Vanderbilt Beach, forty percent of whom have contributed more than $100,000 to engage experts and fight the development are not enough, what exactly will be enough to persuade you to do the right thing? Please, when it comes before you, vote to deny the project as it is currently proposed. If you do approve something for the site, and remember we are not opposed to reasonable development, please approve the project with the conditions that your own Planning Staff proposed. They are reasonable and result in a project that is compatible with and complementary to the neighborhood. In hopes of a more reasonable project, I am respectfully, Kathryn McCaffery __________________________ --------------------- From:Hanley Kanar To:McDanielBill Subject:Vanderbilt neighborhood and don’t turn Naples into a borg of Miami Date:Thursday, February 11, 2021 12:56:03 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: I am sending the prewritten letter opposing the Stock One Development project One Naples because it does a good job delineating the main issues, but I want to add a personal note as well. One of the most appealing things about Naples is that it has an old Floridian beauty about it, with lovely smaller buildings and a walkable neighborhood feel, and Vanderbilt Beach is a perfect jewel. The two buildings and either side of the proposed towers are smaller and set back a great deal, allowing better and nicer beach access. The proposed monstrosity is planned for the area, surrounding Daruma and right along S. Bay Dr. and Vanderbilt Beach Road will hog the waterfront block views and hamper access. Both of these are set back quite a distance from the road, particularly the Ritz. This project is actually much closer geographically than either the Beechmoor or Ritz and would set a new precedent for density, bleeding over into virtually every future project for the county. On March 1 you and your fellow Commissioners will be hearing Stock Development’s application for One Naples. I am writing you today to express my strong opposition to the development as Stock has proposed it. Frankly, knowing how much opposition there is to the project’s design, I am amazed that this is a hard decision for you. From what I understand of your logic, you feel that the neighborhood is not capable of understanding the nuances of the matter before you, and that you, alone, know what is good for us. When you tell people, “Be careful what you wish for.” you are saying that we don’t know what we are asking. I assure you that we do understand the ramifications of asking that Stock respect the existing C-3 zoning, and I am asking you to vote to deny his proposed amendment to the Growth Management Plan. I cannot be more direct. You have for too long and for too often voted to allow developers to run slipshod over the wishes of your taxpaying constituents. It must stop! I will be watching and listening on March 1st to hold your feet to the fire. Please don’t “33234” Naples to death. Please don’t “33234” this beautiful and distinctive area. I am watching and I have a long memory and I vote. Sincerely, Hanley Kanar --------------------- From:Dustin D Nelson To:McDanielBill Subject:Vanderbilt neighborhood and One Naples Development Date:Sunday, February 14, 2021 10:20:12 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: As a real estate lawyer who has for over 30 years been involved in zoning matters, I find it unfathomable that the massive departure from current rules would be considered at all. I find myself wondering if consideration of this unneeded and unwanted and ill-conceived development is suggestive of something rotten to the core within local government. On March 1 you and your fellow Commissioners will be hearing Stock Development’s application for One Naples. I am writing to express my strong opposition to the development as Stock has proposed it. Over the past 40 years, I have witnessed the changes. There has been growth beyond belief, but it has been managed – for the most part – with some care and respect for the charm that attracted my family to the community in the first place. This would not be just a nail in the coffin to that charm. It would be dropping an anvil on an egg. Please vote against the proposed amendment to the existing C-3 zoning. Sincerely, Dustin D. Nelson, Esq. __________________________ --------------------- From:Dustin D Nelson To:McDanielBill Subject:Vanderbilt neighborhood and One Naples Development Date:Sunday, February 14, 2021 10:21:16 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: As a real estate lawyer who has for over 30 years been involved in zoning matters, I find it unfathomable that the massive departure from current rules would be considered at all. I find myself wondering if consideration of this unneeded and unwanted and ill-conceived development is suggestive of something rotten to the core within local government. On March 1 you and your fellow Commissioners will be hearing Stock Development’s application for One Naples. I am writing to express my strong opposition to the development as Stock has proposed it. Over the past 40 years, I have witnessed the changes. There has been growth beyond belief, but it has been managed – for the most part – with some care and respect for the charm that attracted my family to the community in the first place. This would not be just a nail in the coffin to that charm. It would be dropping an anvil on an egg. Please vote against the proposed amendment to the existing C-3 zoning. Sincerely, Dustin D. Nelson, Esq. --------------------- From:Patrick McCaffery sr To:McDanielBill Subject:Vanderbilt neighborhood Beachwalk Date:Thursday, January 14, 2021 7:45:14 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: I am writing you today to express my opposition to the Stock Development One Naples as it is currently proposed. I was encouraged by the action of the Planning Commission and their inability to recommend approval not only of the current Stock plan, but of a watered-down version that reduced the outrageous tower heights by almost 25%, and extremely diminished setbacks. They did their job, protecting the community. Now it’s your turn. Planning Commissioner Frye said it best when he asked the other Commissioners how they could ignore the outpouring of sentiment from the community. These are your constituents, your voters. Isn’t it your responsibility to listen to those who will live with this atrocity for decades to come and to vehemently deny the developer the right to build it? If hundreds of emails exhorting you to deny the project are not enough, if more than eighty people who signed up to speak against the project at the Planning Commission are not enough, if the 1,100 members of Save Vanderbilt Beach, forty percent of whom have contributed more than $100,000 to engage experts and fight the development are not enough, what exactly will be enough to persuade you to do the right thing? Please, when it comes before you, vote to deny the project as it is currently proposed. If you do approve something for the site, and remember we are not opposed to reasonable development, please approve the project with the conditions that your own Planning Staff proposed. They are reasonable and result in a project that is compatible with and complementary to the neighborhood. In hopes of a more reasonable project, I am respectfully, _Patrick McCaffery sr_________________________ --------------------- From:Patrick McCaffery sr To:McDanielBill Subject:Vanderbilt neighborhood Beachwalk Date:Sunday, January 3, 2021 8:15:15 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: I am writing you today to express my opposition to the Stock Development One Naples as it is currently proposed. I was encouraged by the action of the Planning Commission and their inability to recommend approval not only of the current Stock plan, but of a watered-down version that reduced the outrageous tower heights by almost 25%, and extremely diminished setbacks. They did their job, protecting the community. Now it’s your turn. Planning Commissioner Frye said it best when he asked the other Commissioners how they could ignore the outpouring of sentiment from the community. These are your constituents, your voters. Isn’t it your responsibility to listen to those who will live with this atrocity for decades to come and to vehemently deny the developer the right to build it? If hundreds of emails exhorting you to deny the project are not enough, if more than eighty people who signed up to speak against the project at the Planning Commission are not enough, if the 1,100 members of Save Vanderbilt Beach, forty percent of whom have contributed more than $100,000 to engage experts and fight the development are not enough, what exactly will be enough to persuade you to do the right thing? Please, when it comes before you, vote to deny the project as it is currently proposed. If you do approve something for the site, and remember we are not opposed to reasonable development, please approve the project with the conditions that your own Planning Staff proposed. They are reasonable and result in a project that is compatible with and complementary to the neighborhood. In hopes of a more reasonable project, I am respectfully, Patrick McCaffery sr__________________________ --------------------- From:Judi Loisi To:McDanielBill Subject:Vanderbilt neighborhood district 2 Date:Sunday, February 14, 2021 8:53:20 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: On March 1 you and your fellow Commissioners will be hearing Stock Development’s application for One Naples. I am writing you today to express my strong opposition to the development as Stock has proposed it. I know full well that this development is not in our District, and that you generally tend to vote with the Commissioner in whose District the project lies. But, in this case I ask you to act independently. Residents of Commissioner Solis’ District have overwhelmingly shown their opposition. I know that you are aware of that as I know that you have received hundreds of emails telling you so. I believe that Commissioner Solis intends to vote in support of the Stock amendment to the Growth Management Plan. His reason for doing so is flawed. He feels that the neighborhood is not capable of understanding the nuances of the matter before you, and that he, alone, know what is good for his District. When he tells people, “Be careful what you wish for.” he is saying that the residents of the affected neighborhood don’t know for what they are asking. I assure you that they do understand the ramifications of asking that Stock respect the existing C-3 zoning. One Naples is not simply a District 2 issue. It’s approval would send a message that for the Commissioners it’s “business as usual,” and the they have little concern for the “Miamification” of Collier County. It would represent the long-held pattern of the Board of County Commissioners supporting developers over neighborhoods. That must stop! I am asking you to vote to deny Stock’s proposed amendment to the Growth Management Plan. I cannot be more direct. You have for too long and for too often voted to allow developers to run slipshod over the wishes of your taxpaying constituents. I will be there on March 1st to hold your feet to the fire. Please deny stocks request! Judi Loisi____________________ --------------------- From:Paul R. Shea To:McDanielBill Subject:Vanderbilt neighborhood- ONE Naples Request to Change the GMP Date:Wednesday, February 17, 2021 4:08:34 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: I am a member of the County Planning Commission and I sat through the many hours of testimony at our CCPC meetings regarding the ONE Naples request. I am relatively new to the Planning Commission. Prior to being appointed I was part of our majority population that believed the County always approves developer requests to change the Growth Management . This is one of the reasons, I accepted the position. That reputation has to change. We represent the residents not the developers. My mindset is you establish a plan that the residents can rely on and only make changes that benefit the residents of Collier County. I also, go to Vanderbilt beach regularly. To me this is a no brainer to not approve this application. There is no good reason or any resident support to change our current GMP and certainly no benefit other than to the developer. If you support this request to change, you will be continuing to prove to the residents of Collier County that you do not represent the residents but rather the developers which would be a very sad message to send the public. And quite frankly it would make me reconsider if it is worth my time to be a Planning Commissioner. Please do the right thing and vote against the ONE Naples request. __________________________ --------------------- From:Pamela Massimi To:McDanielBill Subject:Vanderbilt neighborhood Stock Project Date:Friday, February 26, 2021 12:55:45 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: My husband and I moved 11 years ago into the Vanderbilt Beach area. We chose this area over areas like Park Shore due to its low key, more quaint neighborhood feel. We both love the beach very much and have seen a dramatic change to the beach with it becoming more crowded due to the increase in population in Naples. Vanderbilt is a very narrow Beach and cannot support the amount of people that it has now ….. We can’t imagine a residential project of this size and the impact that it will have on the beach and traffic areas. On March 1 you and your fellow Commissioners will be hearing Stock Development’s application for One Naples. I am writing you today to express my strong opposition to the development as Stock has proposed it. I assure you that we do understand the ramifications of asking that Stock respect the existing C-3 zoning, and I am asking you to vote to deny his proposed amendment to the Growth Management Plan. We will be there on March 1st and i’m hoping that you will please vote against this project. Sincerely, Pamela and Charles Massimi --------------------- From:Richard Duarte To:McDanielBill Subject:Vanderbilt neighborhood Date:Friday, January 1, 2021 8:25:24 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: I am writing you today to express my opposition to the Stock Development One Naples as it is currently proposed. I was encouraged by the action of the Planning Commission and their inability to recommend approval not only of the current Stock plan, but of a watered-down version that reduced the outrageous tower heights by almost 25%, and extremely diminished setbacks. They did their job, protecting the community. Now it’s your turn. Planning Commissioner Frye said it best when he asked the other Commissioners how they could ignore the outpouring of sentiment from the community. These are your constituents, your voters. Isn’t it your responsibility to listen to those who will live with this atrocity for decades to come and to vehemently deny the developer the right to build it? If hundreds of emails exhorting you to deny the project are not enough, if more than eighty people who signed up to speak against the project at the Planning Commission are not enough, if the 1,100 members of Save Vanderbilt Beach, forty percent of whom have contributed more than $100,000 to engage experts and fight the development are not enough, what exactly will be enough to persuade you to do the right thing? Please, when it comes before you, vote to deny the project as it is currently proposed. If you do approve something for the site, and remember we are not opposed to reasonable development, please approve the project with the conditions that your own Planning Staff proposed. They are reasonable and result in a project that is compatible with and complementary to the neighborhood. In hopes of a more reasonable project, I am respectfully, __________________________ --------------------- From:Jill DenHerder To:McDanielBill Subject:Vanderbilt neighborhood Date:Friday, January 1, 2021 7:12:30 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: I am writing you today to express my opposition to the Stock Development One Naples as it is currently proposed. I was encouraged by the action of the Planning Commission and their inability to recommend approval not only of the current Stock plan, but of a watered-down version that reduced the outrageous tower heights by almost 25%, and extremely diminished setbacks. They did their job, protecting the community. Now it’s your turn. Planning Commissioner Frye said it best when he asked the other Commissioners how they could ignore the outpouring of sentiment from the community. These are your constituents, your voters. Isn’t it your responsibility to listen to those who will live with this atrocity for decades to come and to vehemently deny the developer the right to build it? If hundreds of emails exhorting you to deny the project are not enough, if more than eighty people who signed up to speak against the project at the Planning Commission are not enough, if the 1,100 members of Save Vanderbilt Beach, forty percent of whom have contributed more than $100,000 to engage experts and fight the development are not enough, what exactly will be enough to persuade you to do the right thing? Please, when it comes before you, vote to deny the project as it is currently proposed. If you do approve something for the site, and remember we are not opposed to reasonable development, please approve the project with the conditions that your own Planning Staff proposed. They are reasonable and result in a project that is compatible with and complementary to the neighborhood. In hopes of a more reasonable project, I am respectfully, Jill DenHerder --------------------- From:Jill DenHerder To:McDanielBill Subject:Vanderbilt neighborhood Date:Friday, January 1, 2021 7:10:27 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: I am writing you today to express my opposition to the Stock Development One Naples as it is currently proposed. I was encouraged by the action of the Planning Commission and their inability to recommend approval not only of the current Stock plan, but of a watered-down version that reduced the outrageous tower heights by almost 25%, and extremely diminished setbacks. They did their job, protecting the community. Now it’s your turn. Planning Commissioner Frye said it best when he asked the other Commissioners how they could ignore the outpouring of sentiment from the community. These are your constituents, your voters. Isn’t it your responsibility to listen to those who will live with this atrocity for decades to come and to vehemently deny the developer the right to build it? If hundreds of emails exhorting you to deny the project are not enough, if more than eighty people who signed up to speak against the project at the Planning Commission are not enough, if the 1,100 members of Save Vanderbilt Beach, forty percent of whom have contributed more than $100,000 to engage experts and fight the development are not enough, what exactly will be enough to persuade you to do the right thing? Please, when it comes before you, vote to deny the project as it is currently proposed. If you do approve something for the site, and remember we are not opposed to reasonable development, please approve the project with the conditions that your own Planning Staff proposed. They are reasonable and result in a project that is compatible with and complementary to the neighborhood. In hopes of a more reasonable project, I am respectfully, Jill DenHerder --------------------- From:Lee Gostomski To:McDanielBill Subject:Vanderbilt neighborhood Date:Friday, January 1, 2021 7:07:20 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: I am writing you today to express my opposition to the Stock Development One Naples as it is currently proposed. I was encouraged by the action of the Planning Commission and their inability to recommend approval not only of the current Stock plan, but of a watered-down version that reduced the outrageous tower heights by almost 25%, and extremely diminished setbacks. They did their job, protecting the community. Now it’s your turn. Planning Commissioner Frye said it best when he asked the other Commissioners how they could ignore the outpouring of sentiment from the community. These are your constituents, your voters. Isn’t it your responsibility to listen to those who will live with this atrocity for decades to come and to vehemently deny the developer the right to build it? If hundreds of emails exhorting you to deny the project are not enough, if more than eighty people who signed up to speak against the project at the Planning Commission are not enough, if the 1,100 members of Save Vanderbilt Beach, forty percent of whom have contributed more than $100,000 to engage experts and fight the development are not enough, what exactly will be enough to persuade you to do the right thing? Please, when it comes before you, vote to deny the project as it is currently proposed. If you do approve something for the site, and remember we are not opposed to reasonable development, please approve the project with the conditions that your own Planning Staff proposed. They are reasonable and result in a project that is compatible with and complementary to the neighborhood. In hopes of a more reasonable project, I am respectfully, __________________________ --------------------- From:George and Kristine Sayrafe To:McDanielBill Subject:Vanderbilt neighborhood Date:Friday, January 1, 2021 11:43:11 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: I am writing you today to express my opposition to the Stock Development One Naples as it is currently proposed. I was encouraged by the action of the Planning Commission and their inability to recommend approval not only of the current Stock plan, but of a watered-down version that reduced the outrageous tower heights by almost 25%, and extremely diminished setbacks. They did their job, protecting the community. Now it’s your turn. Planning Commissioner Frye said it best when he asked the other Commissioners how they could ignore the outpouring of sentiment from the community. These are your constituents, your voters. Isn’t it your responsibility to listen to those who will live with this atrocity for decades to come and to vehemently deny the developer the right to build it? If hundreds of emails exhorting you to deny the project are not enough, if more than eighty people who signed up to speak against the project at the Planning Commission are not enough, if the 1,100 members of Save Vanderbilt Beach, forty percent of whom have contributed more than $100,000 to engage experts and fight the development are not enough, what exactly will be enough to persuade you to do the right thing? Please, when it comes before you, vote to deny the project as it is currently proposed. If you do approve something for the site, and remember we are not opposed to reasonable development, please approve the project with the conditions that your own Planning Staff proposed. They are reasonable and result in a project that is compatible with and complementary to the neighborhood. In hopes of a more reasonable project, I am respectfully, __________________________ --------------------- From:Judi Loisi To:McDanielBill Subject:Vanderbilt neighborhood Date:Friday, January 1, 2021 11:30:01 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: I am writing you today to express my opposition to the Stock Development One Naples as it is currently proposed. I was encouraged by the action of the Planning Commission and their inability to recommend approval not only of the current Stock plan, but of a watered-down version that reduced the outrageous tower heights by almost 25%, and extremely diminished setbacks. They did their job, protecting the community. Now it’s your turn. Planning Commissioner Frye said it best when he asked the other Commissioners how they could ignore the outpouring of sentiment from the community. These are your constituents, your voters. Isn’t it your responsibility to listen to those who will live with this atrocity for decades to come and to vehemently deny the developer the right to build it? If hundreds of emails exhorting you to deny the project are not enough, if more than eighty people who signed up to speak against the project at the Planning Commission are not enough, if the 1,100 members of Save Vanderbilt Beach, forty percent of whom have contributed more than $100,000 to engage experts and fight the development are not enough, what exactly will be enough to persuade you to do the right thing? Please, when it comes before you, vote to deny the project as it is currently proposed. If you do approve something for the site, and remember we are not opposed to reasonable development, please approve the project with the conditions that your own Planning Staff proposed. They are reasonable and result in a project that is compatible with and complementary to the neighborhood. In hopes of a more reasonable project, I am respectfully, __________________________ --------------------- From:Judi To:McDanielBill Subject:Vanderbilt neighborhood Date:Friday, January 1, 2021 11:28:27 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: I am writing you today to express my opposition to the Stock Development One Naples as it is currently proposed. I was encouraged by the action of the Planning Commission and their inability to recommend approval not only of the current Stock plan, but of a watered-down version that reduced the outrageous tower heights by almost 25%, and extremely diminished setbacks. They did their job, protecting the community. Now it’s your turn. Planning Commissioner Frye said it best when he asked the other Commissioners how they could ignore the outpouring of sentiment from the community. These are your constituents, your voters. Isn’t it your responsibility to listen to those who will live with this atrocity for decades to come and to vehemently deny the developer the right to build it? If hundreds of emails exhorting you to deny the project are not enough, if more than eighty people who signed up to speak against the project at the Planning Commission are not enough, if the 1,100 members of Save Vanderbilt Beach, forty percent of whom have contributed more than $100,000 to engage experts and fight the development are not enough, what exactly will be enough to persuade you to do the right thing? Please, when it comes before you, vote to deny the project as it is currently proposed. If you do approve something for the site, and remember we are not opposed to reasonable development, please approve the project with the conditions that your own Planning Staff proposed. They are reasonable and result in a project that is compatible with and complementary to the neighborhood. In hopes of a more reasonable project, I am respectfully, __________________________ --------------------- From:Judi To:McDanielBill Subject:Vanderbilt neighborhood Date:Friday, January 1, 2021 11:25:11 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: I am writing today in my continued opposition to the One Naples project as proposed. I understand that, at a recent special meeting of the Commissioners, a decision was made to hold the March 1st hearing at the Commissioners’ chamber in the County office building. Because of the COVID-19 virus, and the social distancing it requires, this venue is not conducive to the very large turnout by all those who have an opinion about One Naples, pro or con. I hope that you and your fellow Commissioners will reconsider. Better locations might include St John the Evangelist Church, North Collier County Regional Park, a Collier County School auditorium, or even the Phil at Artis. Thank you for your consideration. __________________________ --------------------- From:kay barton To:McDanielBill Subject:Vanderbilt neighborhood Date:Friday, January 1, 2021 10:13:34 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: I am writing you today to express my opposition to the Stock Development One Naples as it is currently proposed. I was encouraged by the action of the Planning Commission and their inability to recommend approval not only of the current Stock plan, but of a watered-down version that reduced the outrageous tower heights by almost 25%, and extremely diminished setbacks. They did their job, protecting the community. Now it’s your turn. Planning Commissioner Frye said it best when he asked the other Commissioners how they could ignore the outpouring of sentiment from the community. These are your constituents, your voters. Isn’t it your responsibility to listen to those who will live with this atrocity for decades to come and to vehemently deny the developer the right to build it? If hundreds of emails exhorting you to deny the project are not enough, if more than eighty people who signed up to speak against the project at the Planning Commission are not enough, if the 1,100 members of Save Vanderbilt Beach, forty percent of whom have contributed more than $100,000 to engage experts and fight the development are not enough, what exactly will be enough to persuade you to do the right thing? Please, when it comes before you, vote to deny the project as it is currently proposed. If you do approve something for the site, and remember we are not opposed to reasonable development, please approve the project with the conditions that your own Planning Staff proposed. They are reasonable and result in a project that is compatible with and complementary to the neighborhood. In hopes of a more reasonable project, I am respectfully, __________________________ --------------------- From:kay barton To:McDanielBill Subject:Vanderbilt neighborhood Date:Friday, January 1, 2021 10:12:29 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: I am writing you today to express my opposition to the Stock Development One Naples as it is currently proposed. I was encouraged by the action of the Planning Commission and their inability to recommend approval not only of the current Stock plan, but of a watered-down version that reduced the outrageous tower heights by almost 25%, and extremely diminished setbacks. They did their job, protecting the community. Now it’s your turn. Planning Commissioner Frye said it best when he asked the other Commissioners how they could ignore the outpouring of sentiment from the community. These are your constituents, your voters. Isn’t it your responsibility to listen to those who will live with this atrocity for decades to come and to vehemently deny the developer the right to build it? If hundreds of emails exhorting you to deny the project are not enough, if more than eighty people who signed up to speak against the project at the Planning Commission are not enough, if the 1,100 members of Save Vanderbilt Beach, forty percent of whom have contributed more than $100,000 to engage experts and fight the development are not enough, what exactly will be enough to persuade you to do the right thing? Please, when it comes before you, vote to deny the project as it is currently proposed. If you do approve something for the site, and remember we are not opposed to reasonable development, please approve the project with the conditions that your own Planning Staff proposed. They are reasonable and result in a project that is compatible with and complementary to the neighborhood. In hopes of a more reasonable project, I am respectfully, __________________________ --------------------- From:Anne Gargano To:McDanielBill Subject:Vanderbilt neighborhood Date:Friday, January 1, 2021 10:05:57 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: I am writing you today to express my opposition to the Stock Development One Naples as it is currently proposed. I was encouraged by the action of the Planning Commission and their inability to recommend approval not only of the current Stock plan, but of a watered-down version that reduced the outrageous tower heights by almost 25%, and extremely diminished setbacks. They did their job, protecting the community. Now it’s your turn. Planning Commissioner Frye said it best when he asked the other Commissioners how they could ignore the outpouring of sentiment from the community. These are your constituents, your voters. Isn’t it your responsibility to listen to those who will live with this atrocity for decades to come and to vehemently deny the developer the right to build it? If hundreds of emails exhorting you to deny the project are not enough, if more than eighty people who signed up to speak against the project at the Planning Commission are not enough, if the 1,100 members of Save Vanderbilt Beach, forty percent of whom have contributed more than $100,000 to engage experts and fight the development are not enough, what exactly will be enough to persuade you to do the right thing? Please, when it comes before you, vote to deny the project as it is currently proposed. If you do approve something for the site, and remember we are not opposed to reasonable development, please approve the project with the conditions that your own Planning Staff proposed. They are reasonable and result in a project that is compatible with and complementary to the neighborhood. In hopes of a more reasonable project, I am respectfully, _____Anne Gargano_____________________ --------------------- From:Roger Dolden To:McDanielBill Subject:Vanderbilt neighborhood Date:Tuesday, January 5, 2021 8:16:25 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: I am writing today in my continued opposition to the One Naples project as proposed. I understand that, at a recent special meeting of the Commissioners, a decision was made to hold the March 1st hearing at the Commissioners’ chamber in the County office building. Because of the COVID-19 virus, and the social distancing it requires, this venue is not conducive to the very large turnout by all those who have an opinion about One Naples, pro or con. I hope that you and your fellow Commissioners will reconsider. Better locations might include St John the Evangelist Church, North Collier County Regional Park, a Collier County School auditorium, or even the Phil at Artis. Thank you for your consideration. Roger Dolden __________________________ I agree that some form of development is warranted at the Naples One corner, though the scale, density and set back of this proposal would be destructive to this neighborhood and to Naples as a whole. --------------------- From:Ellen Gilmore To:McDanielBill Subject:Vanderbilt neighborhood Date:Wednesday, January 6, 2021 1:09:47 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: I am writing today in my continued opposition to the One Naples project as proposed. I understand that, at a recent special meeting of the Commissioners, a decision was made to hold the March 1st hearing at the Commissioners’ chamber in the County office building. Because of the COVID-19 virus, and the social distancing it requires, this venue is not conducive to the very large turnout by all those who have an opinion about One Naples, pro or con. I hope that you and your fellow Commissioners will reconsider. Better locations might include St John the Evangelist Church, North Collier County Regional Park, a Collier County School auditorium, or even the Phil at Artis. Thank you for your consideration. __________________________ --------------------- From:Don Nealon To:McDanielBill Subject:Vanderbilt neighborhood Date:Tuesday, January 12, 2021 10:50:59 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: I am writing today in my continued opposition to the One Naples project as proposed. I understand that, at a recent special meeting of the Commissioners, a decision was made to hold the March 1st hearing at the Commissioners’ chamber in the County office building. Because of the COVID-19 virus, and the social distancing it requires, this venue is not conducive to the very large turnout by all those who have an opinion about One Naples, pro or con. I hope that you and your fellow Commissioners will reconsider. Better locations might include St John the Evangelist Church, North Collier County Regional Park, a Collier County School auditorium, or even the Phil at Artis. Thank you for your consideration. __________________________ --------------------- From:Anita Cariati To:McDanielBill Subject:Vanderbilt neighborhood Date:Sunday, January 10, 2021 3:01:03 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: I am writing you today to express my opposition to the Stock Development One Naples as it is currently proposed. I was encouraged by the action of the Planning Commission and their inability to recommend approval not only of the current Stock plan, but of a watered-down version that reduced the outrageous tower heights by almost 25%, and extremely diminished setbacks. They did their job, protecting the community. Now it’s your turn. Planning Commissioner Frye said it best when he asked the other Commissioners how they could ignore the outpouring of sentiment from the community. These are your constituents, your voters. Isn’t it your responsibility to listen to those who will live with this atrocity for decades to come and to vehemently deny the developer the right to build it? If hundreds of emails exhorting you to deny the project are not enough, if more than eighty people who signed up to speak against the project at the Planning Commission are not enough, if the 1,100 members of Save Vanderbilt Beach, forty percent of whom have contributed more than $100,000 to engage experts and fight the development are not enough, what exactly will be enough to persuade you to do the right thing? Please, when it comes before you, vote to deny the project as it is currently proposed. If you do approve something for the site, and remember we are not opposed to reasonable development, please approve the project with the conditions that your own Planning Staff proposed. They are reasonable and result in a project that is compatible with and complementary to the neighborhood. In hopes of a more reasonable project, I am respectfully, __________________________ --------------------- From:Hugo Paiz To:McDanielBill Subject:Vanderbilt neighborhood Date:Tuesday, February 9, 2021 6:01:05 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: On March 1 you and your fellow Commissioners will be hearing Stock Development’s application for One Naples. I am writing you today to express my strong opposition to the development as Stock has proposed it. I know full well that this development is not in our District, and that you generally tend to vote with the Commissioner in whose District the project lies. But, in this case I ask you to act independently. Residents of Commissioner Solis’ District have overwhelmingly shown their opposition. I know that you are aware of that as I know that you have received hundreds of emails telling you so. I believe that Commissioner Solis intends to vote in support of the Stock amendment to the Growth Management Plan. His reason for doing so is flawed. He feels that the neighborhood is not capable of understanding the nuances of the matter before you, and that he, alone, know what is good for his District. When he tells people, “Be careful what you wish for.” he is saying that the residents of the affected neighborhood don’t know for what they are asking. I assure you that they do understand the ramifications of asking that Stock respect the existing C-3 zoning. One Naples is not simply a District 2 issue. It’s approval would send a message that for the Commissioners it’s “business as usual,” and the they have little concern for the “Miamification” of Collier County. It would represent the long-held pattern of the Board of County Commissioners supporting developers over neighborhoods. That must stop! I am asking you to vote to deny Stock’s proposed amendment to the Growth Management Plan. I cannot be more direct. You have for too long and for too often voted to allow developers to run slipshod over the wishes of your taxpaying constituents. I will be there on March 1st to hold your feet to the fire. __________________________ --------------------- From:Hugo Paiz To:McDanielBill Subject:Vanderbilt neighborhood Date:Tuesday, February 9, 2021 5:59:31 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: On March 1 you and your fellow Commissioners will be hearing Stock Development’s application for One Naples. I am writing you today to express my strong opposition to the development as Stock has proposed it. I know full well that this development is not in our District, and that you generally tend to vote with the Commissioner in whose District the project lies. But, in this case I ask you to act independently. Residents of Commissioner Solis’ District have overwhelmingly shown their opposition. I know that you are aware of that as I know that you have received hundreds of emails telling you so. I believe that Commissioner Solis intends to vote in support of the Stock amendment to the Growth Management Plan. His reason for doing so is flawed. He feels that the neighborhood is not capable of understanding the nuances of the matter before you, and that he, alone, know what is good for his District. When he tells people, “Be careful what you wish for.” he is saying that the residents of the affected neighborhood don’t know for what they are asking. I assure you that they do understand the ramifications of asking that Stock respect the existing C-3 zoning. One Naples is not simply a District 2 issue. It’s approval would send a message that for the Commissioners it’s “business as usual,” and the they have little concern for the “Miamification” of Collier County. It would represent the long-held pattern of the Board of County Commissioners supporting developers over neighborhoods. That must stop! I am asking you to vote to deny Stock’s proposed amendment to the Growth Management Plan. I cannot be more direct. You have for too long and for too often voted to allow developers to run slipshod over the wishes of your taxpaying constituents. I will be there on March 1st to hold your feet to the fire. __________________________ --------------------- From:C A Bruckermann To:McDanielBill Subject:Vanderbilt neighborhood Date:Tuesday, February 9, 2021 1:51:56 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: On March 1 you and your fellow Commissioners will be hearing Stock Development’s application for One Naples. I am writing you today to express my strong opposition to the development as Stock has proposed it. I know full well that this development is not in our District, and that you generally tend to vote with the Commissioner in whose District the project lies. But, in this case I ask you to act independently. Residents of Commissioner Solis’ District have overwhelmingly shown their opposition. I know that you are aware of that as I know that you have received hundreds of emails telling you so. I believe that Commissioner Solis intends to vote in support of the Stock amendment to the Growth Management Plan. His reason for doing so is flawed. He feels that the neighborhood is not capable of understanding the nuances of the matter before you, and that he, alone, know what is good for his District. When he tells people, “Be careful what you wish for.” he is saying that the residents of the affected neighborhood don’t know for what they are asking. I assure you that they do understand the ramifications of asking that Stock respect the existing C-3 zoning. One Naples is not simply a District 2 issue. It’s approval would send a message that for the Commissioners it’s “business as usual,” and the they have little concern for the “Miamification” of Collier County. It would represent the long-held pattern of the Board of County Commissioners supporting developers over neighborhoods. That must stop! I am asking you to vote to deny Stock’s proposed amendment to the Growth Management Plan. I cannot be more direct. You have for too long and for too often voted to allow developers to run slipshod over the wishes of your taxpaying constituents. Please don't enable the "quick buck" massive-development mentality at the expense of what makes Naples special. Don't urbanize the beach front with this out-of-all-proportions project. Sincerely, Cynthia Bruckermann __________________________ --------------------- From:Paul Bennett To:McDanielBill Subject:Vanderbilt neighborhood Date:Tuesday, February 9, 2021 11:45:59 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: On March 1 you and your fellow Commissioners will be hearing Stock Development’s application for One Naples. I am writing you today to express my strong opposition to the development as Stock has proposed it. I know full well that this development is not in our District, and that you generally tend to vote with the Commissioner in whose District the project lies. But, in this case I ask you to act independently. Residents of Commissioner Solis’ District have overwhelmingly shown their opposition. I know that you are aware of that as I know that you have received hundreds of emails telling you so. I believe that Commissioner Solis intends to vote in support of the Stock amendment to the Growth Management Plan. His reason for doing so is flawed. He feels that the neighborhood is not capable of understanding the nuances of the matter before you, and that he, alone, know what is good for his District. When he tells people, “Be careful what you wish for.” he is saying that the residents of the affected neighborhood don’t know for what they are asking. I assure you that they do understand the ramifications of asking that Stock respect the existing C-3 zoning. One Naples is not simply a District 2 issue. It’s approval would send a message that for the Commissioners it’s “business as usual,” and the they have little concern for the “Miamification” of Collier County. It would represent the long-held pattern of the Board of County Commissioners supporting developers over neighborhoods. That must stop! I am asking you to vote to deny Stock’s proposed amendment to the Growth Management Plan. I cannot be more direct. You have for too long and for too often voted to allow developers to run slipshod over the wishes of your taxpaying constituents. I do not want to see Naples turn into a Fort Lauderdale or Miami. Naples is distinctly different with our clear skyline. We need to keep it that way. Stick with current C-3 zoning and don’t turn us into something we don’t want. I will be there on March 1st to hold your feet to the fire. Sincerely, Paul Bennett __________________________ --------------------- From:Judy Zazworsky To:McDanielBill Subject:Vanderbilt neighborhood Date:Tuesday, February 9, 2021 11:27:39 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: On March 1 you and your fellow Commissioners will be hearing Stock Development’s application for One Naples. I am writing you today to express my strong opposition to the development as Stock has proposed it. I live in District 2 and know that you generally tend to vote with the Commissioner in whose District the project lies. But, in this case I ask you to act independently. Residents of Commissioner Solis’ District have overwhelmingly shown their opposition. I know that you are aware of that as I know that you have received hundreds of emails telling you so. I believe that Commissioner Solis intends to vote in support of the Stock amendment to the Growth Management Plan. His reason for doing so is flawed. He feels that our neighborhood is not capable of understanding the nuances of the matter before you, and that he, alone, know what is good for our District. When he tells people, “Be careful what you wish for.” he is saying that the residents of our District don’t know for what they are asking. I assure you that we do understand the ramifications of asking that Stock respect the existing C-3 zoning. One Naples is not simply a District 2 issue. It’s approval would send a message that for the Commissioners it’s “business as usual,” and the they have little concern for the “Miamification” of Collier County. It would represent the long-held pattern of the Board of County Commissioners supporting developers over neighborhoods. That must stop! I am asking you to vote to deny Stock’s proposed amendment to the Growth Management Plan. I cannot be more direct. You have for too long and for too often voted to allow developers to run slipshod over the wishes of your taxpaying constituents. I will be there on March 1st to hold your feet to the fire. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Judy Zazworsky __________________________ --------------------- From:Rosa B To:McDanielBill Subject:Vanderbilt neighborhood Date:Tuesday, February 9, 2021 8:08:05 AM Attachments:RE Vanderbilt neighborhood.msg EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: On March 1 you and your fellow Commissioners will be hearing Stock Development’s application for One Naples. I am writing you today to express my strong opposition to the development as Stock has proposed it. I know full well that this development is not in our District, and that you generally tend to vote with the Commissioner in whose District the project lies. But, in this case I ask you to act independently. Residents of Commissioner Solis’ District have overwhelmingly shown their opposition. I know that you are aware of that as I know that you have received hundreds of emails telling you so. I believe that Commissioner Solis intends to vote in support of the Stock amendment to the Growth Management Plan. His reason for doing so is flawed. He feels that the neighborhood is not capable of understanding the nuances of the matter before you, and that he, alone, know what is good for his District. When he tells people, “Be careful what you wish for.” he is saying that the residents of the affected neighborhood don’t know for what they are asking. I assure you that they do understand the ramifications of asking that Stock respect the existing C-3 zoning. One Naples is not simply a District 2 issue. It’s approval would send a message that for the Commissioners it’s “business as usual,” and the they have little concern for the “Miamification” of Collier County. It would represent the long-held pattern of the Board of County Commissioners supporting developers over neighborhoods. That must stop! I am asking you to vote to deny Stock’s proposed amendment to the Growth Management Plan. I cannot be more direct. You have for too long and for too often voted to allow developers to run slipshod over the wishes of your taxpaying constituents. I will be there on March 1st to hold your feet to the fire. ___________Rosa Barrueto _______________ --------------------- From:Mike Hughes To:McDanielBill Subject:Vanderbilt neighborhood Date:Tuesday, February 9, 2021 4:48:13 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: On March 1 you and your fellow Commissioners will be hearing Stock Development’s application for One Naples. I am writing you today to express my strong opposition to the development as Stock has proposed it. I know full well that this development is not in our District, and that you generally tend to vote with the Commissioner in whose District the project lies. But, in this case I ask you to act independently. Residents of Commissioner Solis’ District have overwhelmingly shown their opposition. I know that you are aware of that as I know that you have received hundreds of emails telling you so. I believe that Commissioner Solis intends to vote in support of the Stock amendment to the Growth Management Plan. His reason for doing so is flawed. He feels that the neighborhood is not capable of understanding the nuances of the matter before you, and that he, alone, know what is good for his District. When he tells people, “Be careful what you wish for.” he is saying that the residents of the affected neighborhood don’t know for what they are asking. I assure you that they do understand the ramifications of asking that Stock respect the existing C-3 zoning. One Naples is not simply a District 2 issue. It’s approval would send a message that for the Commissioners it’s “business as usual,” and the they have little concern for the “Miamification” of Collier County. It would represent the long-held pattern of the Board of County Commissioners supporting developers over neighborhoods. That must stop! I am asking you to vote to deny Stock’s proposed amendment to the Growth Management Plan. I cannot be more direct. You have for too long and for too often voted to allow developers to run slipshod over the wishes of your taxpaying constituents. I will be there on March 1st to hold your feet to the fire. __________________________ --------------------- From:Mary M Ethington To:McDanielBill Subject:Vanderbilt neighborhood Date:Tuesday, February 9, 2021 12:34:33 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: On March 1 you and your fellow Commissioners will be hearing Stock Development’s application for One Naples. I am writing you today to express my strong opposition to the development as Stock has proposed it. I have been coming to Naples in the winters since 1973. When friends of ours from the Midwest talk about where they want to purchase a condo in FL, many are starting to say – not Naples – it has gotten too crowded. By allowing this Stock development to proceed, you will be proving them right! The over-sized buildings will make Vanderbilt Beach Road overly congested and will make the lifestyle we all have come to Naples to enjoy more similar to the congestion we are trying to get away from in our northern cities. Please consider the wishes of the area residents and vote "no" on this proposal. Sincerely, Mary Ethington 7515 Pelican Bay Boulevard --------------------- From:Robert Barger To:McDanielBill Subject:Vanderbilt neighborhood Date:Monday, February 8, 2021 10:19:31 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: On March 1 you and your fellow Commissioners will be hearing Stock Development’s application for One Naples. I am writing you today to express my strong opposition to the development as Stock has proposed it. I know full well that this development is not in our District, and that you generally tend to vote with the Commissioner in whose District the project lies. But, in this case I ask you to act independently. Residents of Commissioner Solis’ District have overwhelmingly shown their opposition. I know that you are aware of that as I know that you have received hundreds of emails telling you so. I believe that Commissioner Solis intends to vote in support of the Stock amendment to the Growth Management Plan. His reason for doing so is flawed. He feels that the neighborhood is not capable of understanding the nuances of the matter before you, and that he, alone, know what is good for his District. When he tells people, “Be careful what you wish for.” he is saying that the residents of the affected neighborhood don’t know for what they are asking. I assure you that they do understand the ramifications of asking that Stock respect the existing C-3 zoning. One Naples is not simply a District 2 issue. It’s approval would send a message that for the Commissioners it’s “business as usual,” and the they have little concern for the “Miamification” of Collier County. It would represent the long-held pattern of the Board of County Commissioners supporting developers over neighborhoods. That must stop! I am asking you to vote to deny Stock’s proposed amendment to the Growth Management Plan. I cannot be more direct. You have for too long and for too often voted to allow developers to run slipshod over the wishes of your taxpaying constituents. I will be there on March 1st to hold your feet to the fire. Bob Barger __________________________ --------------------- From:Robert Barger To:McDanielBill Subject:Vanderbilt neighborhood Date:Monday, February 8, 2021 9:22:41 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: On March 1 you and your fellow Commissioners will be hearing Stock Development’s application for One Naples. I am writing you today to express my strong opposition to the development as Stock has proposed it. I know full well that this development is not in our District, and that you generally tend to vote with the Commissioner in whose District the project lies. But, in this case I ask you to act independently. Residents of Commissioner Solis’ District have overwhelmingly shown their opposition. I know that you are aware of that as I know that you have received hundreds of emails telling you so. I believe that Commissioner Solis intends to vote in support of the Stock amendment to the Growth Management Plan. His reason for doing so is flawed. He feels that the neighborhood is not capable of understanding the nuances of the matter before you, and that he, alone, know what is good for his District. When he tells people, “Be careful what you wish for.” he is saying that the residents of the affected neighborhood don’t know for what they are asking. I assure you that they do understand the ramifications of asking that Stock respect the existing C-3 zoning. One Naples is not simply a District 2 issue. It’s approval would send a message that for the Commissioners it’s “business as usual,” and the they have little concern for the “Miamification” of Collier County. It would represent the long-held pattern of the Board of County Commissioners supporting developers over neighborhoods. That must stop! I am asking you to vote to deny Stock’s proposed amendment to the Growth Management Plan. I cannot be more direct. You have for too long and for too often voted to allow developers to run slipshod over the wishes of your taxpaying constituents. I will be there on March 1st to hold your feet to the fire. Robert & Sandra Barger __________________________ --------------------- From:s saltz To:McDanielBill Subject:Vanderbilt neighborhood Date:Monday, February 8, 2021 9:00:53 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: On March 1 you and your fellow Commissioners will be hearing Stock Development’s application for One Naples. I am writing you today to express my strong opposition to the development as Stock has proposed it. I know full well that this development is not in our District, and that you generally tend to vote with the Commissioner in whose District the project lies. But, in this case I ask you to act independently. Residents of Commissioner Solis’ District have overwhelmingly shown their opposition. I know that you are aware of that as I know that you have received hundreds of emails telling you so. I believe that Commissioner Solis intends to vote in support of the Stock amendment to the Growth Management Plan. His reason for doing so is flawed. He feels that the neighborhood is not capable of understanding the nuances of the matter before you, and that he, alone, know what is good for his District. When he tells people, “Be careful what you wish for.” he is saying that the residents of the affected neighborhood don’t know for what they are asking. I assure you that they do understand the ramifications of asking that Stock respect the existing C-3 zoning. One Naples is not simply a District 2 issue. It’s approval would send a message that for the Commissioners it’s “business as usual,” and the they have little concern for the “Miamification” of Collier County. It would represent the long-held pattern of the Board of County Commissioners supporting developers over neighborhoods. That must stop! I am asking you to vote to deny Stock’s proposed amendment to the Growth Management Plan. I cannot be more direct. You have for too long and for too often voted to allow developers to run slipshod over the wishes of your taxpaying constituents. I will be there on March 1st to hold your feet to the fire. __________________________ --------------------- From:s saltz To:McDanielBill Subject:Vanderbilt neighborhood Date:Monday, February 8, 2021 8:59:50 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: On March 1 you and your fellow Commissioners will be hearing Stock Development’s application for One Naples. I am writing you today to express my strong opposition to the development as Stock has proposed it. I know full well that this development is not in our District, and that you generally tend to vote with the Commissioner in whose District the project lies. But, in this case I ask you to act independently. Residents of Commissioner Solis’ District have overwhelmingly shown their opposition. I know that you are aware of that as I know that you have received hundreds of emails telling you so. I believe that Commissioner Solis intends to vote in support of the Stock amendment to the Growth Management Plan. His reason for doing so is flawed. He feels that the neighborhood is not capable of understanding the nuances of the matter before you, and that he, alone, know what is good for his District. When he tells people, “Be careful what you wish for.” he is saying that the residents of the affected neighborhood don’t know for what they are asking. I assure you that they do understand the ramifications of asking that Stock respect the existing C-3 zoning. One Naples is not simply a District 2 issue. It’s approval would send a message that for the Commissioners it’s “business as usual,” and the they have little concern for the “Miamification” of Collier County. It would represent the long-held pattern of the Board of County Commissioners supporting developers over neighborhoods. That must stop! I am asking you to vote to deny Stock’s proposed amendment to the Growth Management Plan. I cannot be more direct. You have for too long and for too often voted to allow developers to run slipshod over the wishes of your taxpaying constituents. I will be there on March 1st to hold your feet to the fire. __________________________ --------------------- From:MEG CATANZARITA To:McDanielBill Subject:Vanderbilt neighborhood Date:Monday, February 8, 2021 8:46:57 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: On March 1 you and your fellow Commissioners will be hearing Stock Development’s application for One Naples. I am writing you today to express my strong opposition to the development as Stock has proposed it. I know full well that this development is not in our District, and that you generally tend to vote with the Commissioner in whose District the project lies. But, in this case I ask you to act independently. Residents of Commissioner Solis’ District have overwhelmingly shown their opposition. I know that you are aware of that as I know that you have received hundreds of emails telling you so. I believe that Commissioner Solis intends to vote in support of the Stock amendment to the Growth Management Plan. His reason for doing so is flawed. He feels that the neighborhood is not capable of understanding the nuances of the matter before you, and that he, alone, know what is good for his District. When he tells people, “Be careful what you wish for.” he is saying that the residents of the affected neighborhood don’t know for what they are asking. I assure you that they do understand the ramifications of asking that Stock respect the existing C-3 zoning. One Naples is not simply a District 2 issue. It’s approval would send a message that for the Commissioners it’s “business as usual,” and the they have little concern for the “Miamification” of Collier County. It would represent the long-held pattern of the Board of County Commissioners supporting developers over neighborhoods. That must stop! I am asking you to vote to deny Stock’s proposed amendment to the Growth Management Plan. I cannot be more direct. You have for too long and for too often voted to allow developers to run slipshod over the wishes of your taxpaying constituents. I will be there on March 1st to hold your feet to the fire. Meg Catanzarita __________________________ --------------------- From:Meg Catanzarita To:McDanielBill Subject:Vanderbilt neighborhood Date:Monday, February 8, 2021 8:45:54 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: On March 1 you and your fellow Commissioners will be hearing Stock Development’s application for One Naples. I am writing you today to express my strong opposition to the development as Stock has proposed it. I know full well that this development is not in our District, and that you generally tend to vote with the Commissioner in whose District the project lies. But, in this case I ask you to act independently. Residents of Commissioner Solis’ District have overwhelmingly shown their opposition. I know that you are aware of that as I know that you have received hundreds of emails telling you so. I believe that Commissioner Solis intends to vote in support of the Stock amendment to the Growth Management Plan. His reason for doing so is flawed. He feels that the neighborhood is not capable of understanding the nuances of the matter before you, and that he, alone, know what is good for his District. When he tells people, “Be careful what you wish for.” he is saying that the residents of the affected neighborhood don’t know for what they are asking. I assure you that they do understand the ramifications of asking that Stock respect the existing C-3 zoning. One Naples is not simply a District 2 issue. It’s approval would send a message that for the Commissioners it’s “business as usual,” and the they have little concern for the “Miamification” of Collier County. It would represent the long-held pattern of the Board of County Commissioners supporting developers over neighborhoods. That must stop! I am asking you to vote to deny Stock’s proposed amendment to the Growth Management Plan. I cannot be more direct. You have for too long and for too often voted to allow developers to run slipshod over the wishes of your taxpaying constituents. I will be there on March 1st to hold your feet to the fire. Also, I think One Naplrs offering g money to condo associations to gain their support speaks to the developers’ “Win at any cost” mentality. Not who I want for a neighbor! __________________________ --------------------- From:Michael Garofalo To:McDanielBill Subject:Vanderbilt neighborhood Date:Sunday, February 7, 2021 9:54:55 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: On March 1 you and your fellow Commissioners will be hearing Stock Development’s application for One Naples. I am writing you today to express my strong opposition to the development as Stock has proposed it. I know full well that this development is not in our District, and that you generally tend to vote with the Commissioner in whose District the project lies. But, in this case I ask you to act independently. Residents of Commissioner Solis’ District have overwhelmingly shown their opposition. I know that you are aware of that as I know that you have received hundreds of emails telling you so. I believe that Commissioner Solis intends to vote in support of the Stock amendment to the Growth Management Plan. His reason for doing so is flawed. He feels that the neighborhood is not capable of understanding the nuances of the matter before you, and that he, alone, know what is good for his District. When he tells people, “Be careful what you wish for.” he is saying that the residents of the affected neighborhood don’t know for what they are asking. I assure you that they do understand the ramifications of asking that Stock respect the existing C-3 zoning. One Naples is not simply a District 2 issue. It’s approval would send a message that for the Commissioners it’s “business as usual,” and the they have little concern for the “Miamification” of Collier County. It would represent the long-held pattern of the Board of County Commissioners supporting developers over neighborhoods. That must stop! I am asking you to vote to deny Stock’s proposed amendment to the Growth Management Plan. I cannot be more direct. You have for too long and for too often voted to allow developers to run slipshod over the wishes of your taxpaying constituents. I will be there on March 1st to hold your feet to the fire. __________________________ --------------------- From:Michael Garofalo To:McDanielBill Subject:Vanderbilt neighborhood Date:Sunday, February 7, 2021 9:53:43 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: On March 1 you and your fellow Commissioners will be hearing Stock Development’s application for One Naples. I am writing you today to express my strong opposition to the development as Stock has proposed it. I know full well that this development is not in our District, and that you generally tend to vote with the Commissioner in whose District the project lies. But, in this case I ask you to act independently. Residents of Commissioner Solis’ District have overwhelmingly shown their opposition. I know that you are aware of that as I know that you have received hundreds of emails telling you so. I believe that Commissioner Solis intends to vote in support of the Stock amendment to the Growth Management Plan. His reason for doing so is flawed. He feels that the neighborhood is not capable of understanding the nuances of the matter before you, and that he, alone, know what is good for his District. When he tells people, “Be careful what you wish for.” he is saying that the residents of the affected neighborhood don’t know for what they are asking. I assure you that they do understand the ramifications of asking that Stock respect the existing C-3 zoning. One Naples is not simply a District 2 issue. It’s approval would send a message that for the Commissioners it’s “business as usual,” and the they have little concern for the “Miamification” of Collier County. It would represent the long-held pattern of the Board of County Commissioners supporting developers over neighborhoods. That must stop! I am asking you to vote to deny Stock’s proposed amendment to the Growth Management Plan. I cannot be more direct. You have for too long and for too often voted to allow developers to run slipshod over the wishes of your taxpaying constituents. I will be there on March 1st to hold your feet to the fire. __________________________ --------------------- From:Beth M Garofalo To:McDanielBill Subject:Vanderbilt neighborhood Date:Sunday, February 7, 2021 9:49:15 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: On March 1 you and your fellow Commissioners will be hearing Stock Development’s application for One Naples. I am writing you today to express my strong opposition to the development as Stock has proposed it. I know full well that this development is not in our District, and that you generally tend to vote with the Commissioner in whose District the project lies. But, in this case I ask you to act independently. Residents of Commissioner Solis’ District have overwhelmingly shown their opposition. I know that you are aware of that as I know that you have received hundreds of emails telling you so. I believe that Commissioner Solis intends to vote in support of the Stock amendment to the Growth Management Plan. His reason for doing so is flawed. He feels that the neighborhood is not capable of understanding the nuances of the matter before you, and that he, alone, know what is good for his District. When he tells people, “Be careful what you wish for.” he is saying that the residents of the affected neighborhood don’t know for what they are asking. I assure you that they do understand the ramifications of asking that Stock respect the existing C-3 zoning. One Naples is not simply a District 2 issue. It’s approval would send a message that for the Commissioners it’s “business as usual,” and the they have little concern for the “Miamification” of Collier County. It would represent the long-held pattern of the Board of County Commissioners supporting developers over neighborhoods. That must stop! I am asking you to vote to deny Stock’s proposed amendment to the Growth Management Plan. I cannot be more direct. You have for too long and for too often voted to allow developers to run slipshod over the wishes of your taxpaying constituents. I will be there on March 1st to hold your feet to the fire. __________________________ --------------------- From:Rick OBrien To:McDanielBill Subject:Vanderbilt neighborhood Date:Tuesday, February 2, 2021 1:31:06 PM Attachments:RE Vanderbilt neighborhood.msg EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: I am writing today in my continued opposition to the One Naples project as proposed. I understand that, at a recent special meeting of the Commissioners, a decision was made to hold the March 1st hearing at the Commissioners’ chamber in the County office building. Because of the COVID-19 virus, and the social distancing it requires, this venue is not conducive to the very large turnout by all those who have an opinion about One Naples, pro or con. I hope that you and your fellow Commissioners will reconsider. Better locations might include St John the Evangelist Church, North Collier County Regional Park, a Collier County School auditorium, or even the Phil at Artis. Thank you for your consideration. Richard OBrien 586 Beachwalk Circle Unit 105 __________________________ --------------------- From:Barbara Rougraff To:McDanielBill Subject:Vanderbilt neighborhood Date:Thursday, February 11, 2021 8:20:18 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: I am writing today to voice my opposition to the One Naples Project. I realize that there have been a lot of back and forths and compromises by Stock Development, but I still don't think it is enough in line with the current zoning requirements. Thank you, Barbara Rougraff __________________________ --------------------- From:David Freund To:McDanielBill Subject:Vanderbilt neighborhood Date:Sunday, February 14, 2021 6:49:10 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: On March 1 you and your fellow Commissioners will be hearing Stock Development’s application for One Naples. I am writing you today to express my strong opposition to the development as Stock has proposed it. I know full well that this development is not in our District, and that you generally tend to vote with the Commissioner in whose District the project lies. But, in this case I ask you to act independently. Residents of Commissioner Solis’ District have overwhelmingly shown their opposition. I know that you are aware of that as I know that you have received hundreds of emails telling you so. I believe that Commissioner Solis intends to vote in support of the Stock amendment to the Growth Management Plan. His reason for doing so is flawed. He feels that the neighborhood is not capable of understanding the nuances of the matter before you, and that he, alone, know what is good for his District. When he tells people, “Be careful what you wish for.” he is saying that the residents of the affected neighborhood don’t know for what they are asking. I assure you that they do understand the ramifications of asking that Stock respect the existing C-3 zoning. One Naples is not simply a District 2 issue. It’s approval would send a message that for the Commissioners it’s “business as usual,” and the they have little concern for the “Miamification” of Collier County. It would represent the long-held pattern of the Board of County Commissioners supporting developers over neighborhoods. That must stop! I am asking you to vote to deny Stock’s proposed amendment to the Growth Management Plan. I cannot be more direct. You have for too long and for too often voted to allow developers to run slipshod over the wishes of your taxpaying constituents. You were elected by your constituents to regulate. So "regulate!" _Marian Freund_________________________ --------------------- From:Marian Freund To:McDanielBill Subject:Vanderbilt neighborhood Date:Sunday, February 14, 2021 6:42:14 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: On March 1 you and your fellow Commissioners will be hearing Stock Development’s application for One Naples. I am writing you today to express my strong opposition to the development as Stock has proposed it. I know full well that this development is not in our District, and that you generally tend to vote with the Commissioner in whose District the project lies. But, in this case I ask you to act independently. Residents of Commissioner Solis’ District have overwhelmingly shown their opposition. I know that you are aware of that as I know that you have received hundreds of emails telling you so. I believe that Commissioner Solis intends to vote in support of the Stock amendment to the Growth Management Plan. His reason for doing so is flawed. He feels that the neighborhood is not capable of understanding the nuances of the matter before you, and that he, alone, know what is good for his District. When he tells people, “Be careful what you wish for.” he is saying that the residents of the affected neighborhood don’t know for what they are asking. I assure you that they do understand the ramifications of asking that Stock respect the existing C-3 zoning. One Naples is not simply a District 2 issue. It’s approval would send a message that for the Commissioners it’s “business as usual,” and the they have little concern for the “Miamification” of Collier County. It would represent the long-held pattern of the Board of County Commissioners supporting developers over neighborhoods. That must stop! I am asking you to vote to deny Stock’s proposed amendment to the Growth Management Plan. I cannot be more direct. You have for too long and for too often voted to allow developers to run slipshod over the wishes of your taxpaying constituents. There is nothing in Naples One as currently proposed that is in the best interests of your constituents! Marian Freund __________________________ --------------------- From:Theodore J Raia To:McDanielBill Subject:Vanderbilt neighborhood Date:Sunday, February 14, 2021 6:05:51 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: I am writing in reference to your possible support for the One Naples project. Since retiring to Naples some 25 years ago I have witnessed the operation of development in Collier County. On the surface there is a very impressive Land Development Code. Unfortunately, it is not very effective because the real LDC is what ever the County Commissioners approve. Couple this with the subliminal system that most commissioners will vote to approve any application that is submitted from a district if the commissioner of that district recommends it. This is essentially a quid pro quo, “you approve mine and I will approve yours”. Where does this leave the tax paying residents of Collier County. Just as this is one country, our country, – it is one county, our county. The deviations from the LDC for the One Naples project are an insult to the people. The developers claim that he is saving us from a commercial development is farcical. That corner is at the end of a dead-end road. It is not at the intersection of two principal roads. Commercial development there would be to serve the local community and beach goers, something that is more practical but not nearly as profitable. COL (Ret) Ted Raia, USA _________________ --------------------- From:dmcardle@zrfmlaw.com To:McDanielBill Subject:Vanderbilt neighborhood Date:Sunday, February 14, 2021 5:41:42 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: On March 1 you and your fellow Commissioners will be hearing Stock Development’s application for One Naples. I am writing you today to express my strong opposition to the development as Stock has proposed it. I know full well that this development is not in our District, and that you generally tend to vote with the Commissioner in whose District the project lies. But, in this case I ask you to act independently. Residents of Commissioner Solis’ District have overwhelmingly shown their opposition. I know that you are aware of that as I know that you have received hundreds of emails telling you so. I believe that Commissioner Solis intends to vote in support of the Stock amendment to the Growth Management Plan. His reason for doing so is flawed. He feels that the neighborhood is not capable of understanding the nuances of the matter before you, and that he, alone, know what is good for his District. When he tells people, “Be careful what you wish for.” he is saying that the residents of the affected neighborhood don’t know for what they are asking. I assure you that they do understand the ramifications of asking that Stock respect the existing C-3 zoning. One Naples is not simply a District 2 issue. It’s approval would send a message that for the Commissioners it’s “business as usual,” and the they have little concern for the “Miamification” of Collier County. It would represent the long-held pattern of the Board of County Commissioners supporting developers over neighborhoods. That must stop! I am asking you to vote to deny Stock’s proposed amendment to the Growth Management Plan. I cannot be more direct. You have for too long and for too often voted to allow developers to run slipshod over the wishes of your taxpaying constituents. I will be there on March 1st to hold your feet to the fire. __________________________ --------------------- From:Paul R Alby To:McDanielBill Subject:Vanderbilt neighborhood Date:Sunday, February 14, 2021 11:32:40 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: On March 1 you and your fellow Commissioners will be hearing Stock Development’s application for One Naples. I am writing you today to express my strong opposition to the development as Stock has proposed it. I know full well that this development is not in our District, and that you generally tend to vote with the Commissioner in whose District the project lies. But, in this case I ask you to act independently. Residents of Commissioner Solis’ District have overwhelmingly shown their opposition. I know that you are aware of that as I know that you have received hundreds of emails telling you so. I believe that Commissioner Solis intends to vote in support of the Stock amendment to the Growth Management Plan. His reason for doing so is flawed. He feels that the neighborhood is not capable of understanding the nuances of the matter before you, and that he, alone, know what is good for his District. When he tells people, “Be careful what you wish for.” he is saying that the residents of the affected neighborhood don’t know for what they are asking. I assure you that they do understand the ramifications of asking that Stock respect the existing C-3 zoning. One Naples is not simply a District 2 issue. It’s approval would send a message that for the Commissioners it’s “business as usual,” and the they have little concern for the “Miamification” of Collier County. It would represent the long-held pattern of the Board of County Commissioners supporting developers over neighborhoods. That must stop! I am asking you to vote to deny Stock’s proposed amendment to the Growth Management Plan. I cannot be more direct. You have for too long and for too often voted to allow developers to run slipshod over the wishes of your taxpaying constituents. I will be there on March 1st to hold your feet to the fire. _Paul R. Alby_________________________ --------------------- From:Steve Valdivia To:McDanielBill Subject:Vanderbilt neighborhood Date:Sunday, February 14, 2021 9:01:55 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: We live here and am deeply concerned for the future of the area. The overcrowdedness, the water and air quality but most of all, WHAT IT IS TURNING INTO. On March 1 you and your fellow Commissioners will be hearing Stock Development’s application for One Naples. I am writing you today to express my strong opposition to the development as Stock has proposed it. I know full well that this development is not in our District, and that you generally tend to vote with the Commissioner in whose District the project lies. But, in this case I ask you to act independently. Residents of Commissioner Solis’ District have overwhelmingly shown their opposition. I know that you are aware of that as I know that you have received hundreds of emails telling you so. I believe that Commissioner Solis intends to vote in support of the Stock amendment to the Growth Management Plan. His reason for doing so is flawed. He feels that the neighborhood is not capable of understanding the nuances of the matter before you, and that he, alone, know what is good for his District. When he tells people, “Be careful what you wish for.” he is saying that the residents of the affected neighborhood don’t know for what they are asking. I assure you that they do understand the ramifications of asking that Stock respect the existing C-3 zoning. One Naples is not simply a District 2 issue. It’s approval would send a message that for the Commissioners it’s “business as usual,” and the they have little concern for the “Miamification” of Collier County. It would represent the long-held pattern of the Board of County Commissioners supporting developers over neighborhoods. That must stop! I am asking you to vote to deny Stock’s proposed amendment to the Growth Management Plan. I cannot be more direct. You have for too long and for too often voted to allow developers to run slipshod over the wishes of your taxpaying constituents. I will be there on March 1st to hold your feet to the fire. Steven and Bernice Valdivia 260 Southbay Dr #212 Naples Fl 34108 __________________________ --------------------- From:Steve Valdivia To:McDanielBill Subject:Vanderbilt neighborhood Date:Sunday, February 14, 2021 8:59:59 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: We live here and am deeply concerned for the future of the area. The overcrowdedness, the water and air quality but most of all, WHAT IT IS TURNING INTO. On March 1 you and your fellow Commissioners will be hearing Stock Development’s application for One Naples. I am writing you today to express my strong opposition to the development as Stock has proposed it. I know full well that this development is not in our District, and that you generally tend to vote with the Commissioner in whose District the project lies. But, in this case I ask you to act independently. Residents of Commissioner Solis’ District have overwhelmingly shown their opposition. I know that you are aware of that as I know that you have received hundreds of emails telling you so. I believe that Commissioner Solis intends to vote in support of the Stock amendment to the Growth Management Plan. His reason for doing so is flawed. He feels that the neighborhood is not capable of understanding the nuances of the matter before you, and that he, alone, know what is good for his District. When he tells people, “Be careful what you wish for.” he is saying that the residents of the affected neighborhood don’t know for what they are asking. I assure you that they do understand the ramifications of asking that Stock respect the existing C-3 zoning. One Naples is not simply a District 2 issue. It’s approval would send a message that for the Commissioners it’s “business as usual,” and the they have little concern for the “Miamification” of Collier County. It would represent the long-held pattern of the Board of County Commissioners supporting developers over neighborhoods. That must stop! I am asking you to vote to deny Stock’s proposed amendment to the Growth Management Plan. I cannot be more direct. You have for too long and for too often voted to allow developers to run slipshod over the wishes of your taxpaying constituents. I will be there on March 1st to hold your feet to the fire. Steve and Bernice Valdivia 260 Southbay Dr #212 Naples Fl 34108 __________________________ --------------------- From:Michael fontana To:McDanielBill Subject:Vanderbilt neighborhood Date:Sunday, February 14, 2021 8:56:37 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: On March 1 you and your fellow Commissioners will be hearing Stock Development’s application for One Naples. I am writing you today to express my strong opposition to the development as Stock has proposed it. I know full well that this development is not in our District, and that you generally tend to vote with the Commissioner in whose District the project lies. But, in this case I ask you to act independently. Residents of Commissioner Solis’ District have overwhelmingly shown their opposition. I know that you are aware of that as I know that you have received hundreds of emails telling you so. I believe that Commissioner Solis intends to vote in support of the Stock amendment to the Growth Management Plan. His reason for doing so is flawed. He feels that the neighborhood is not capable of understanding the nuances of the matter before you, and that he, alone, know what is good for his District. When he tells people, “Be careful what you wish for.” he is saying that the residents of the affected neighborhood don’t know for what they are asking. I assure you that they do understand the ramifications of asking that Stock respect the existing C-3 zoning. One Naples is not simply a District 2 issue. It’s approval would send a message that for the Commissioners it’s “business as usual,” and the they have little concern for the “Miamification” of Collier County. It would represent the long-held pattern of the Board of County Commissioners supporting developers over neighborhoods. That must stop! I am asking you to vote to deny Stock’s proposed amendment to the Growth Management Plan. I cannot be more direct. You have for too long and for too often voted to allow developers to run slipshod over the wishes of your taxpaying constituents. I will be there on March 1st to hold your feet to the fire. __________________________ --------------------- From:Carla Kretschmann To:McDanielBill Subject:Vanderbilt neighborhood Date:Sunday, February 14, 2021 8:49:52 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: On March 1 you and your fellow Commissioners will be hearing Stock Development’s application for One Naples. I am writing you today to express my strong opposition to the development as Stock has proposed it. I know full well that this development is not in our District, and that you generally tend to vote with the Commissioner in whose District the project lies. But, in this case I ask you to act independently. Residents of Commissioner Solis’ District have overwhelmingly shown their opposition. I know that you are aware of that as I know that you have received hundreds of emails telling you so. I believe that Commissioner Solis intends to vote in support of the Stock amendment to the Growth Management Plan. His reason for doing so is flawed. He feels that the neighborhood is not capable of understanding the nuances of the matter before you, and that he, alone, know what is good for his District. When he tells people, “Be careful what you wish for.” he is saying that the residents of the affected neighborhood don’t know for what they are asking. I assure you that they do understand the ramifications of asking that Stock respect the existing C-3 zoning. One Naples is not simply a District 2 issue. It’s approval would send a message that for the Commissioners it’s “business as usual,” and the they have little concern for the “Miamification” of Collier County. It would represent the long-held pattern of the Board of County Commissioners supporting developers over neighborhoods. That must stop! I am asking you to vote to deny Stock’s proposed amendment to the Growth Management Plan. I cannot be more direct. You have for too long and for too often voted to allow developers to run slipshod over the wishes of your taxpaying constituents. I will be there on March 1st to hold your feet to the fire. __________________________ --------------------- From:Carla Kretschmann To:McDanielBill Subject:Vanderbilt neighborhood Date:Sunday, February 14, 2021 8:48:21 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: On March 1 you and your fellow Commissioners will be hearing Stock Development’s application for One Naples. I am writing you today to express my strong opposition to the development as Stock has proposed it. I know full well that this development is not in our District, and that you generally tend to vote with the Commissioner in whose District the project lies. But, in this case I ask you to act independently. Residents of Commissioner Solis’ District have overwhelmingly shown their opposition. I know that you are aware of that as I know that you have received hundreds of emails telling you so. I believe that Commissioner Solis intends to vote in support of the Stock amendment to the Growth Management Plan. His reason for doing so is flawed. He feels that the neighborhood is not capable of understanding the nuances of the matter before you, and that he, alone, know what is good for his District. When he tells people, “Be careful what you wish for.” he is saying that the residents of the affected neighborhood don’t know for what they are asking. I assure you that they do understand the ramifications of asking that Stock respect the existing C-3 zoning. One Naples is not simply a District 2 issue. It’s approval would send a message that for the Commissioners it’s “business as usual,” and the they have little concern for the “Miamification” of Collier County. It would represent the long-held pattern of the Board of County Commissioners supporting developers over neighborhoods. That must stop! I am asking you to vote to deny Stock’s proposed amendment to the Growth Management Plan. I cannot be more direct. You have for too long and for too often voted to allow developers to run slipshod over the wishes of your taxpaying constituents. I will be there on March 1st to hold your feet to the fire. __________________________ --------------------- From:Geoffrion Suzanne To:McDanielBill Subject:Vanderbilt neighborhood Date:Sunday, February 14, 2021 8:33:04 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: On March 1 you and your fellow Commissioners will be hearing Stock Development’s application for One Naples. I am writing you today to express my strong opposition to the development as Stock has proposed it. I know full well that this development is not in our District, and that you generally tend to vote with the Commissioner in whose District the project lies. But, in this case I ask you to act independently. Residents of Commissioner Solis’ District have overwhelmingly shown their opposition. I know that you are aware of that as I know that you have received hundreds of emails telling you so. I believe that Commissioner Solis intends to vote in support of the Stock amendment to the Growth Management Plan. His reason for doing so is flawed. He feels that the neighborhood is not capable of understanding the nuances of the matter before you, and that he, alone, know what is good for his District. When he tells people, “Be careful what you wish for.” he is saying that the residents of the affected neighborhood don’t know for what they are asking. I assure you that they do understand the ramifications of asking that Stock respect the existing C-3 zoning. One Naples is not simply a District 2 issue. It’s approval would send a message that for the Commissioners it’s “business as usual,” and the they have little concern for the “Miamification” of Collier County. It would represent the long-held pattern of the Board of County Commissioners supporting developers over neighborhoods. That must stop! I am asking you to vote to deny Stock’s proposed amendment to the Growth Management Plan. I cannot be more direct. You have for too long and for too often voted to allow developers to run slipshod over the wishes of your taxpaying constituents. I will be there on March 1st to hold your feet to the fire. Suzanne Geoffrion_____________________ --------------------- From:Gale Morgan To:McDanielBill Subject:Vanderbilt neighborhood Date:Sunday, February 14, 2021 8:09:00 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: On March 1 you and your fellow Commissioners will be hearing Stock Development’s application for One Naples. I am writing you today to express my strong opposition to the development as Stock has proposed it. I know full well that this development is not in our District, and that you generally tend to vote with the Commissioner in whose District the project lies. But, in this case I ask you to act independently. Residents of Commissioner Solis’ District have overwhelmingly shown their opposition. I know that you are aware of that as I know that you have received hundreds of emails telling you so. I believe that Commissioner Solis intends to vote in support of the Stock amendment to the Growth Management Plan. His reason for doing so is flawed. He feels that the neighborhood is not capable of understanding the nuances of the matter before you, and that he, alone, know what is good for his District. When he tells people, “Be careful what you wish for.” he is saying that the residents of the affected neighborhood don’t know for what they are asking. I assure you that they do understand the ramifications of asking that Stock respect the existing C-3 zoning. One Naples is not simply a District 2 issue. It’s approval would send a message that for the Commissioners it’s “business as usual,” and the they have little concern for the “Miamification” of Collier County. It would represent the long-held pattern of the Board of County Commissioners supporting developers over neighborhoods. That must stop! I am asking you to vote to deny Stock’s proposed amendment to the Growth Management Plan. I cannot be more direct. You have for too long and for too often voted to allow developers to run slipshod over the wishes of your taxpaying constituents. I will be there on March 1st to hold your feet to the fire. __________________________ --------------------- From:kim suchy To:McDanielBill Subject:Vanderbilt neighborhood Date:Sunday, February 14, 2021 7:34:09 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: I know you receive countless letters on this matter but please note that there are countless residents who care and would appreciate your steadfastness and vote against this project. On March 1 you and your fellow Commissioners will be hearing Stock Development’s application for One Naples. I am writing you today to express my strong opposition to the development as Stock has proposed it. I know full well that this development is not in our District, and that you generally tend to vote with the Commissioner in whose District the project lies. But, in this case I ask you to act independently. Residents of Commissioner Solis’ District have overwhelmingly shown their opposition. I know that you are aware of that as I know that you have received hundreds of emails telling you so. I believe that Commissioner Solis intends to vote in support of the Stock amendment to the Growth Management Plan. His reason for doing so is flawed. He feels that the neighborhood is not capable of understanding the nuances of the matter before you, and that he, alone, know what is good for his District. When he tells people, “Be careful what you wish for.” he is saying that the residents of the affected neighborhood don’t know for what they are asking. I assure you that they do understand the ramifications of asking that Stock respect the existing C-3 zoning. One Naples is not simply a District 2 issue. It’s approval would send a message that for the Commissioners it’s “business as usual,” and the they have little concern for the “Miamification” of Collier County. It would represent the long-held pattern of the Board of County Commissioners supporting developers over neighborhoods. That must stop! I am asking you to vote to deny Stock’s proposed amendment to the Growth Management Plan. I cannot be more direct. You have for too long and for too often voted to allow developers to run slipshod over the wishes of your taxpaying constituents. I will be there on March 1st to hold your feet to the fire. __________________________ --------------------- From:Renée Gauthier To:McDanielBill Subject:Vanderbilt neighborhood Date:Wednesday, February 10, 2021 1:59:17 PM Attachments:RE Vanderbilt neighborhood.msg EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: On March 1 you and your fellow Commissioners will be hearing Stock Development’s application for One Naples. I am writing you today to express my strong opposition to the development as Stock has proposed it. I know full well that this development is not in our District, and that you generally tend to vote with the Commissioner in whose District the project lies. But, in this case I ask you to act independently. Residents of Commissioner Solis’ District have overwhelmingly shown their opposition. I know that you are aware of that as I know that you have received hundreds of emails telling you so. I believe that Commissioner Solis intends to vote in support of the Stock amendment to the Growth Management Plan. His reason for doing so is flawed. He feels that the neighborhood is not capable of understanding the nuances of the matter before you, and that he, alone, know what is good for his District. When he tells people, “Be careful what you wish for.” he is saying that the residents of the affected neighborhood don’t know for what they are asking. I assure you that they do understand the ramifications of asking that Stock respect the existing C-3 zoning. One Naples is not simply a District 2 issue. It’s approval would send a message that for the Commissioners it’s “business as usual,” and the they have little concern for the “Miamification” of Collier County. It would represent the long-held pattern of the Board of County Commissioners supporting developers over neighborhoods. That must stop! I am asking you to vote to deny Stock’s proposed amendment to the Growth Management Plan. I cannot be more direct. You have for too long and for too often voted to allow developers to run slipshod over the wishes of your taxpaying constituents. I will be there on March 1st to hold your feet to the fire. Renee Gauthier --------------------- From:Colin Kanar To:McDanielBill Subject:Vanderbilt neighborhood Date:Thursday, February 11, 2021 8:55:06 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: On March 1 you and your fellow Commissioners will be hearing Stock Development’s application for One Naples. I am writing you today to express my strong opposition to the development as Stock has proposed it. I am acutely aware that this proposed project is not in your District, and that you generally tend to vote with the Commissioner in whose District the project lies. But, in this case I ask you to act independently. This is of paramount importance that you resist repeating this practice. Residents of Commissioner Solis’ District have overwhelmingly shown their opposition. This includes the residents of condominium complexes whose silence is being bought by Stock in exchange for improvements to their buildings, seawalls and the like. This nefarious technique is common with drug dealer (not respected developers) so admittedly I was shocked to read a Naples Daily News article quoting Commissioner Solis as stating this is normal, and expected behavior. I know that you are aware of that as I know that you have received hundreds of emails telling you so. I believe, as do many, that Commissioner Solis intends to vote in support of the Stock amendment to the Growth Management Plan. His reason for doing so is flawed and insulting to those who voted for him. I can only conclude that he feels the thousands who oppose this project are not capable of understanding the nuances of the matter before you, and that he, alone, know what is good for his District. When he tells people, “Be careful what you wish for.” he is saying that the residents of the affected neighborhood don’t know for what they are asking. I assure you that they do understand the ramifications of asking that Stock respect the existing C-3 zoning. One Naples is not simply a District 2 issue. It’s approval would send a message that for the Commissioners it’s “business as usual,” and the they have little concern for the “Miamification” of Collier County or those who voted for them. It would represent the long- held pattern of the Board of County Commissioners supporting developers over neighborhoods. That must stop! I am asking you to vote to deny Stock’s proposed amendment to the Growth Management Plan. I cannot be more direct. You have for too long and for too often voted to allow developers to run slipshod over the wishes of your taxpaying constituents. I will be watching and listening on March 1 and despite the venue, participating in any way permitted. I also vote. Very Respectively, Colin Kanar __________________________ --------------------- From:Kathy Pezzuti To:McDanielBill Subject:Vanderbilt neighborhood Date:Monday, February 15, 2021 8:22:28 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: On March 1 you and your fellow Commissioners will be hearing Stock Development’s application for One Naples. I am writing you today to express my strong opposition to the development as Stock has proposed it. I know full well that this development is not in our District, and that you generally tend to vote with the Commissioner in whose District the project lies. But, in this case I ask you to act independently. Residents of Commissioner Solis’ District have overwhelmingly shown their opposition. I know that you are aware of that as I know that you have received hundreds of emails telling you so. I believe that Commissioner Solis intends to vote in support of the Stock amendment to the Growth Management Plan. His reason for doing so is flawed. He feels that the neighborhood is not capable of understanding the nuances of the matter before you, and that he, alone, know what is good for his District. When he tells people, “Be careful what you wish for.” he is saying that the residents of the affected neighborhood don’t know for what they are asking. I assure you that they do understand the ramifications of asking that Stock respect the existing C-3 zoning. One Naples is not simply a District 2 issue. It’s approval would send a message that for the Commissioners it’s “business as usual,” and the they have little concern for the “Miamification” of Collier County. It would represent the long-held pattern of the Board of County Commissioners supporting developers over neighborhoods. That must stop! I am asking you to vote to deny Stock’s proposed amendment to the Growth Management Plan. I cannot be more direct. You have for too long and for too often voted to allow developers to run slipshod over the wishes of your taxpaying constituents. I will be there on March 1st to hold your feet to the fire. Kathy Pezzuti __________________________ --------------------- From:Susan Camino To:McDanielBill Subject:Vanderbilt neighborhood Date:Monday, February 15, 2021 7:57:29 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: On March 1 you and your fellow Commissioners will be hearing Stock Development’s application for One Naples. I am writing you today to express my strong opposition to the development as Stock has proposed it. I know full well that this development is not in our District, and that you generally tend to vote with the Commissioner in whose District the project lies. But, in this case I ask you to act independently. Residents of Commissioner Solis’ District have overwhelmingly shown their opposition. I know that you are aware of that as I know that you have received hundreds of emails telling you so. I believe that Commissioner Solis intends to vote in support of the Stock amendment to the Growth Management Plan. His reason for doing so is flawed. He feels that the neighborhood is not capable of understanding the nuances of the matter before you, and that he, alone, know what is good for his District. When he tells people, “Be careful what you wish for.” he is saying that the residents of the affected neighborhood don’t know for what they are asking. I assure you that they do understand the ramifications of asking that Stock respect the existing C-3 zoning. One Naples is not simply a District 2 issue. It’s approval would send a message that for the Commissioners it’s “business as usual,” and the they have little concern for the “Miamification” of Collier County. It would represent the long-held pattern of the Board of County Commissioners supporting developers over neighborhoods. That must stop! I am asking you to vote to deny Stock’s proposed amendment to the Growth Management Plan. I cannot be more direct. You have for too long and for too often voted to allow developers to run slipshod over the wishes of your taxpaying constituents. I will be there on March 1st to hold your feet to the fire. _/s/ Susan Camino_________________________ --------------------- From:Walter Camino To:McDanielBill Subject:Vanderbilt neighborhood Date:Monday, February 15, 2021 7:55:13 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: On March 1 you and your fellow Commissioners will be hearing Stock Development’s application for One Naples. I am writing you today to express my strong opposition to the development as Stock has proposed it. I know full well that this development is not in our District, and that you generally tend to vote with the Commissioner in whose District the project lies. But, in this case I ask you to act independently. Residents of Commissioner Solis’ District have overwhelmingly shown their opposition. I know that you are aware of that as I know that you have received hundreds of emails telling you so. I believe that Commissioner Solis intends to vote in support of the Stock amendment to the Growth Management Plan. His reason for doing so is flawed. He feels that the neighborhood is not capable of understanding the nuances of the matter before you, and that he, alone, know what is good for his District. When he tells people, “Be careful what you wish for.” he is saying that the residents of the affected neighborhood don’t know for what they are asking. I assure you that they do understand the ramifications of asking that Stock respect the existing C-3 zoning. One Naples is not simply a District 2 issue. It’s approval would send a message that for the Commissioners it’s “business as usual,” and the they have little concern for the “Miamification” of Collier County. It would represent the long-held pattern of the Board of County Commissioners supporting developers over neighborhoods. That must stop! I am asking you to vote to deny Stock’s proposed amendment to the Growth Management Plan. I cannot be more direct. You have for too long and for too often voted to allow developers to run slipshod over the wishes of your taxpaying constituents. I will be there on March 1st to hold your feet to the fire. /s/ Walter Camino __________________________ --------------------- From:Susan Camino To:McDanielBill Subject:Vanderbilt neighborhood Date:Monday, February 15, 2021 7:51:29 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: On March 1 you and your fellow Commissioners will be hearing Stock Development’s application for One Naples. I am writing you today to express my strong opposition to the development as Stock has proposed it. I know full well that this development is not in our District, and that you generally tend to vote with the Commissioner in whose District the project lies. But, in this case I ask you to act independently. Residents of Commissioner Solis’ District have overwhelmingly shown their opposition. I know that you are aware of that as I know that you have received hundreds of emails telling you so. I believe that Commissioner Solis intends to vote in support of the Stock amendment to the Growth Management Plan. His reason for doing so is flawed. He feels that the neighborhood is not capable of understanding the nuances of the matter before you, and that he, alone, know what is good for his District. When he tells people, “Be careful what you wish for.” he is saying that the residents of the affected neighborhood don’t know for what they are asking. I assure you that they do understand the ramifications of asking that Stock respect the existing C-3 zoning. One Naples is not simply a District 2 issue. It’s approval would send a message that for the Commissioners it’s “business as usual,” and the they have little concern for the “Miamification” of Collier County. It would represent the long-held pattern of the Board of County Commissioners supporting developers over neighborhoods. That must stop! I am asking you to vote to deny Stock’s proposed amendment to the Growth Management Plan. I cannot be more direct. You have for too long and for too often voted to allow developers to run slipshod over the wishes of your taxpaying constituents. I will be there on March 1st to hold your feet to the fire. __Susan Camino________________________ --------------------- From:Becky Ruth Macik To:McDanielBill Subject:Vanderbilt neighborhood Date:Monday, February 15, 2021 6:33:21 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: On March 1 you and your fellow Commissioners will be hearing Stock Development’s application for One Naples. I am writing you today to express my strong opposition to the development as Stock has proposed it. I know full well that this development is not in our District, and that you generally tend to vote with the Commissioner in whose District the project lies. But, in this case I ask you to act independently. Residents of Commissioner Solis’ District have overwhelmingly shown their opposition. I know that you are aware of that as I know that you have received hundreds of emails telling you so. I believe that Commissioner Solis intends to vote in support of the Stock amendment to the Growth Management Plan. His reason for doing so is flawed. He feels that the neighborhood is not capable of understanding the nuances of the matter before you, and that he, alone, know what is good for his District. When he tells people, “Be careful what you wish for.” he is saying that the residents of the affected neighborhood don’t know for what they are asking. I assure you that they do understand the ramifications of asking that Stock respect the existing C-3 zoning. One Naples is not simply a District 2 issue. It’s approval would send a message that for the Commissioners it’s “business as usual,” and the they have little concern for the “Miamification” of Collier County. It would represent the long-held pattern of the Board of County Commissioners supporting developers over neighborhoods. That must stop! I am asking you to vote to deny Stock’s proposed amendment to the Growth Management Plan. I cannot be more direct. You have for too long and for too often voted to allow developers to run slipshod over the wishes of your taxpaying constituents. I will be there on March 1st to hold your feet to the fire. Becky R Macik __________________________ --------------------- From:James D Walker To:McDanielBill Subject:Vanderbilt neighborhood Date:Monday, February 15, 2021 3:11:53 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: On March 1 you and your fellow Commissioners will be hearing Stock Development’s application for One Naples. I am writing you today to express my strong opposition to the development as Stock has proposed it. I know full well that this development is not in our District, and that you generally tend to vote with the Commissioner in whose District the project lies. But, in this case I ask you to act independently. Residents of Commissioner Solis’ District have overwhelmingly shown their opposition. I know that you are aware of that as I know that you have received hundreds of emails telling you so. I believe that Commissioner Solis intends to vote in support of the Stock amendment to the Growth Management Plan. His reason for doing so is flawed. He feels that the neighborhood is not capable of understanding the nuances of the matter before you, and that he, alone, know what is good for his District. When he tells people, “Be careful what you wish for.” he is saying that the residents of the affected neighborhood don’t know for what they are asking. I assure you that they do understand the ramifications of asking that Stock respect the existing C-3 zoning. One Naples is not simply a District 2 issue. It’s approval would send a message that for the Commissioners it’s “business as usual,” and the they have little concern for the “Miamification” of Collier County. It would represent the long-held pattern of the Board of County Commissioners supporting developers over neighborhoods. That must stop! I am asking you to vote to deny Stock’s proposed amendment to the Growth Management Plan. I cannot be more direct. You have for too long and for too often voted to allow developers to run slipshod over the wishes of your taxpaying constituents. I will be there on March 1st to hold your feet to the fire. __________________________ --------------------- From:Jeannine moran To:McDanielBill Subject:Vanderbilt neighborhood Date:Monday, February 15, 2021 1:49:06 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: On March 1 you and your fellow Commissioners will be hearing Stock Development’s application for One Naples. I am writing you today to express my strong opposition to the development as Stock has proposed it. I know full well that this development is not in our District, and that you generally tend to vote with the Commissioner in whose District the project lies. But, in this case I ask you to act independently. Residents of Commissioner Solis’ District have overwhelmingly shown their opposition. I know that you are aware of that as I know that you have received hundreds of emails telling you so. I believe that Commissioner Solis intends to vote in support of the Stock amendment to the Growth Management Plan. His reason for doing so is flawed. He feels that the neighborhood is not capable of understanding the nuances of the matter before you, and that he, alone, know what is good for his District. When he tells people, “Be careful what you wish for.” he is saying that the residents of the affected neighborhood don’t know for what they are asking. I assure you that they do understand the ramifications of asking that Stock respect the existing C-3 zoning. One Naples is not simply a District 2 issue. It’s approval would send a message that for the Commissioners it’s “business as usual,” and the they have little concern for the “Miamification” of Collier County. It would represent the long-held pattern of the Board of County Commissioners supporting developers over neighborhoods. That must stop! I am asking you to vote to deny Stock’s proposed amendment to the Growth Management Plan. I cannot be more direct. You have for too long and for too often voted to allow developers to run slipshod over the wishes of your taxpaying constituents. I will be there on March 1st to hold your feet to the fire. __________________________ --------------------- From:David Solomon Bloomfield To:McDanielBill Subject:Vanderbilt neighborhood Date:Monday, February 15, 2021 12:02:34 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: On March 1 you and your fellow Commissioners will be hearing Stock Development’s application for One Naples. I am writing you today to express my strong opposition to the development as Stock has proposed it. I know full well that this development is not in our District, and that you generally tend to vote with the Commissioner in whose District the project lies. But, in this case I ask you to act independently. Residents of Commissioner Solis’ District have overwhelmingly shown their opposition. I know that you are aware of that as I know that you have received hundreds of emails telling you so. I believe that Commissioner Solis intends to vote in support of the Stock amendment to the Growth Management Plan. His reason for doing so is flawed. He feels that the neighborhood is not capable of understanding the nuances of the matter before you, and that he, alone, know what is good for his District. When he tells people, “Be careful what you wish for.” he is saying that the residents of the affected neighborhood don’t know for what they are asking. I assure you that they do understand the ramifications of asking that Stock respect the existing C-3 zoning. One Naples is not simply a District 2 issue. It’s approval would send a message that for the Commissioners it’s “business as usual,” and the they have little concern for the “Miamification” of Collier County. It would represent the long-held pattern of the Board of County Commissioners supporting developers over neighborhoods. That must stop! I am asking you to vote to deny Stock’s proposed amendment to the Growth Management Plan. I cannot be more direct. You have for too long and for too often voted to allow developers to run slipshod over the wishes of your taxpaying constituents. I will be there on March 1st to hold your feet to the fire. __________________________ --------------------- From:Felix Zulauf To:McDanielBill Subject:Vanderbilt neighborhood Date:Monday, February 15, 2021 10:30:35 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: On March 1 you and your fellow Commissioners will be hearing Stock Development’s application for One Naples. I am writing you today to express my strong opposition to the development as Stock has proposed it. I know full well that this development is not in our District, and that you generally tend to vote with the Commissioner in whose District the project lies. But, in this case I ask you to act independently. Residents of Commissioner Solis’ District have overwhelmingly shown their opposition. I know that you are aware of that as I know that you have received hundreds of emails telling you so. I believe that Commissioner Solis intends to vote in support of the Stock amendment to the Growth Management Plan. His reason for doing so is flawed. He feels that the neighborhood is not capable of understanding the nuances of the matter before you, and that he, alone, know what is good for his District. When he tells people, “Be careful what you wish for.” he is saying that the residents of the affected neighborhood don’t know for what they are asking. I assure you that they do understand the ramifications of asking that Stock respect the existing C-3 zoning. One Naples is not simply a District 2 issue. It’s approval would send a message that for the Commissioners it’s “business as usual,” and the they have little concern for the “Miamification” of Collier County. It would represent the long-held pattern of the Board of County Commissioners supporting developers over neighborhoods. That must stop! Or would you liike to enter the history books as the one person who helped destroying our wonderful neighborhood? I am asking you to vote to deny Stock’s proposed amendment to the Growth Management Plan. I cannot be more direct. You have for too long and for too often voted to allow developers to run slipshod over the wishes of your taxpaying constituents. I will be there on March 1st to hold your feet to the fire. Felix W. Zulauf 8787 Bay Colony Drive NAPLES, FL 34108 __________________________ --------------------- From:Clark Price To:McDanielBill Subject:Vanderbilt neighborhood Date:Monday, February 15, 2021 9:47:30 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: On March 1 you and your fellow Commissioners will be hearing Stock Development’s application for One Naples. As a Beachwalk resident, I am writing you today to express my strong opposition to the development as Stock has proposed it. I know full well that this development is not in your District, and that you generally tend to vote with the Commissioner in whose District the project lies. But, in this case I ask you to act independently. Residents of Commissioner Solis’ District have overwhelmingly shown their opposition. I know that you are aware of that as I know that you have received hundreds of emails telling you so. I believe that Commissioner Solis intends to vote in support of the Stock amendment to the Growth Management Plan. His reason for doing so is flawed. One Naples is not simply a District 2 issue. It’s approval would send a message that for the Commissioners it’s “business as usual,” and the they have little concern for the “Miamification” of Collier County. It would represent the long-held pattern of the Board of County Commissioners supporting developers over neighborhoods. That must stop! I am asking you to vote to deny Stock’s proposed amendment to the Growth Management Plan. Your careful consideration will be greatly appreciated. _Clark Price________________________ --------------------- From:pat haggerty To:McDanielBill Subject:Vanderbilt neighborhood Date:Monday, February 15, 2021 8:52:20 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: On March 1 you and your fellow Commissioners will be hearing Stock Development’s application for One Naples. I am writing you today to express my strong opposition to the development as Stock has proposed it. I know full well that this development is not in our District, and that you generally tend to vote with the Commissioner in whose District the project lies. But, in this case I ask you to act independently. Residents of Commissioner Solis’ District have overwhelmingly shown their opposition. I know that you are aware of that as I know that you have received hundreds of emails telling you so. I believe that Commissioner Solis intends to vote in support of the Stock amendment to the Growth Management Plan. His reason for doing so is flawed. He feels that the neighborhood is not capable of understanding the nuances of the matter before you, and that he, alone, know what is good for his District. When he tells people, “Be careful what you wish for.” he is saying that the residents of the affected neighborhood don’t know for what they are asking. I assure you that they do understand the ramifications of asking that Stock respect the existing C-3 zoning. One Naples is not simply a District 2 issue. It’s approval would send a message that for the Commissioners it’s “business as usual,” and the they have little concern for the “Miamification” of Collier County. It would represent the long-held pattern of the Board of County Commissioners supporting developers over neighborhoods. That must stop! I am asking you to vote to deny Stock’s proposed amendment to the Growth Management Plan. I cannot be more direct. You have for too long and for too often voted to allow developers to run slipshod over the wishes of your taxpaying constituents. I will be there on March 1st to hold your feet to the fire. ________pat haggerty__________________ --------------------- From:Jodie Stahl To:McDanielBill Subject:Vanderbilt neighborhood Date:Monday, February 15, 2021 8:23:58 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: On March 1 you and your fellow Commissioners will be hearing Stock Development’s application for One Naples. I am writing you today to express my strong opposition to the development as Stock has proposed it. I know full well that this development is not in our District, and that you generally tend to vote with the Commissioner in whose District the project lies. But, in this case I ask you to act independently. Residents of Commissioner Solis’ District have overwhelmingly shown their opposition. I know that you are aware of that as I know that you have received hundreds of emails telling you so. I believe that Commissioner Solis intends to vote in support of the Stock amendment to the Growth Management Plan. His reason for doing so is flawed. He feels that the neighborhood is not capable of understanding the nuances of the matter before you, and that he, alone, know what is good for his District. When he tells people, “Be careful what you wish for.” he is saying that the residents of the affected neighborhood don’t know for what they are asking. I assure you that they do understand the ramifications of asking that Stock respect the existing C-3 zoning. One Naples is not simply a District 2 issue. It’s approval would send a message that for the Commissioners it’s “business as usual,” and the they have little concern for the “Miamification” of Collier County. It would represent the long-held pattern of the Board of County Commissioners supporting developers over neighborhoods. That must stop! I am asking you to vote to deny Stock’s proposed amendment to the Growth Management Plan. I cannot be more direct. You have for too long and for too often voted to allow developers to run slipshod over the wishes of your taxpaying constituents. I will be there on March 1st to hold your feet to the fire. Jodie L Stahl __________________________ --------------------- From:Wendy Ryan To:McDanielBill Subject:Vanderbilt neighborhood Date:Tuesday, February 16, 2021 9:53:51 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: On March 1 you and your fellow Commissioners will be hearing Stock Development’s application for One Naples. I am writing you today to express my strong opposition to the development as Stock has proposed it. I know full well that this development is not in our District, and that you generally tend to vote with the Commissioner in whose District the project lies. But, in this case I ask you to act independently. Residents of Commissioner Solis’ District have overwhelmingly shown their opposition. I know that you are aware of that as I know that you have received hundreds of emails telling you so. I believe that Commissioner Solis intends to vote in support of the Stock amendment to the Growth Management Plan. His reason for doing so is flawed. He feels that the neighborhood is not capable of understanding the nuances of the matter before you, and that he, alone, know what is good for his District. When he tells people, “Be careful what you wish for.” he is saying that the residents of the affected neighborhood don’t know for what they are asking. I assure you that they do understand the ramifications of asking that Stock respect the existing C-3 zoning. One Naples is not simply a District 2 issue. It’s approval would send a message that for the Commissioners it’s “business as usual,” and the they have little concern for the “Miamification” of Collier County. It would represent the long-held pattern of the Board of County Commissioners supporting developers over neighborhoods. That must stop! I am asking you to vote to deny Stock’s proposed amendment to the Growth Management Plan. I cannot be more direct. You have for too long and for too often voted to allow developers to run slipshod over the wishes of your taxpaying constituents. I will be there on March 1st to hold your feet to the fire. __________________________ --------------------- From:kathy dunne To:McDanielBill Subject:Vanderbilt neighborhood Date:Tuesday, February 16, 2021 11:55:25 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: On March 1 you and your fellow Commissioners will be hearing Stock Development’s application for One Naples. I am writing you today to express my strong opposition to the development as Stock has proposed it. I know full well that this development is not in our District, and that you generally tend to vote with the Commissioner in whose District the project lies. But, in this case I ask you to act independently. Residents of Commissioner Solis’ District have overwhelmingly shown their opposition. I know that you are aware of that as I know that you have received hundreds of emails telling you so. I believe that Commissioner Solis intends to vote in support of the Stock amendment to the Growth Management Plan. His reason for doing so is flawed. He feels that the neighborhood is not capable of understanding the nuances of the matter before you, and that he, alone, know what is good for his District. When he tells people, “Be careful what you wish for.” he is saying that the residents of the affected neighborhood don’t know for what they are asking. I assure you that they do understand the ramifications of asking that Stock respect the existing C-3 zoning. One Naples is not simply a District 2 issue. It’s approval would send a message that for the Commissioners it’s “business as usual,” and the they have little concern for the “Miamification” of Collier County. It would represent the long-held pattern of the Board of County Commissioners supporting developers over neighborhoods. That must stop! I am asking you to vote to deny Stock’s proposed amendment to the Growth Management Plan. I cannot be more direct. You have for too long and for too often voted to allow developers to run slipshod over the wishes of your taxpaying constituents. I will be there on March 1st to hold your feet to the fire. Kathy Dunne __________________________ --------------------- From:kathy dunne To:McDanielBill Subject:Vanderbilt neighborhood Date:Tuesday, February 16, 2021 11:51:02 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: On March 1 you and your fellow Commissioners will be hearing Stock Development’s application for One Naples. I am writing you today to express my strong opposition to the development as Stock has proposed it. As a full time resident, who lives and exercises in this area, too much development, as proposed by Stock will be detrimental to the environment and people living in and visiting the area. Additionally, as a frontline healthcare worker, I believe that the health of Naples residents will be negatively impacted, if such a development were allowed to be built. I know full well that this development is not in our District, and that you generally tend to vote with the Commissioner in whose District the project lies. But, in this case I ask you to act independently. Residents of Commissioner Solis’ District have overwhelmingly shown their opposition. I know that you are aware of that as I know that you have received hundreds of emails telling you so. I believe that Commissioner Solis intends to vote in support of the Stock amendment to the Growth Management Plan. His reason for doing so is flawed. He feels that the neighborhood is not capable of understanding the nuances of the matter before you, and that he, alone, know what is good for his District. When he tells people, “Be careful what you wish for.” he is saying that the residents of the affected neighborhood don’t know for what they are asking. I assure you that they do understand the ramifications of asking that Stock respect the existing C-3 zoning. One Naples is not simply a District 2 issue. It’s approval would send a message that for the Commissioners it’s “business as usual,” and the they have little concern for the “Miamification” of Collier County. It would represent the long-held pattern of the Board of County Commissioners supporting developers over neighborhoods. That must stop! I am asking you to vote to deny Stock’s proposed amendment to the Growth Management Plan. I cannot be more direct. You have for too long and for too often voted to allow developers to run slipshod over the wishes of your taxpaying constituents. I will be there on March 1st to hold your feet to the fire. Kathy Dunne __________________________ --------------------- From:Howard Wallin To:McDanielBill Subject:Vanderbilt neighborhood Date:Tuesday, February 16, 2021 11:29:54 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: On March 1 you and your fellow Commissioners will be hearing Stock Development’s application for One Naples. I am writing you today to express my strong opposition to the development as Stock has proposed it. I know full well that this development is not in our District, and that you generally tend to vote with the Commissioner in whose District the project lies. But, in this case I ask you to act independently. Residents of Commissioner Solis’ District have overwhelmingly shown their opposition. I know that you are aware of that as I know that you have received hundreds of emails telling you so. I believe that Commissioner Solis intends to vote in support of the Stock amendment to the Growth Management Plan. His reason for doing so is flawed. He feels that the neighborhood is not capable of understanding the nuances of the matter before you, and that he, alone, know what is good for his District. When he tells people, “Be careful what you wish for.” he is saying that the residents of the affected neighborhood don’t know for what they are asking. I assure you that they do understand the ramifications of asking that Stock respect the existing C-3 zoning. One Naples is not simply a District 2 issue. It’s approval would send a message that for the Commissioners it’s “business as usual,” and the they have little concern for the “Miamification” of Collier County. It would represent the long-held pattern of the Board of County Commissioners supporting developers over neighborhoods. That must stop! I am asking you to vote to deny Stock’s proposed amendment to the Growth Management Plan. I cannot be more direct. You have for too long and for too often voted to allow developers to run slipshod over the wishes of your taxpaying constituents. I will be there on March 1st to hold your feet to the fire. Howard Wallin __________________________ --------------------- From:Lawrence Hughes To:McDanielBill Subject:Vanderbilt neighborhood Date:Tuesday, February 16, 2021 5:33:31 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: On March 1 you and your fellow Commissioners will be hearing Stock Development’s application for One Naples. I am writing you today to express my strong opposition to the development as Stock has proposed it. I know full well that this development is not in our District, and that you generally tend to vote with the Commissioner in whose District the project lies. But, in this case I ask you to act independently. Residents of Commissioner Solis’ District have overwhelmingly shown their opposition. I know that you are aware of that as I know that you have received hundreds of emails telling you so. I believe that Commissioner Solis intends to vote in support of the Stock amendment to the Growth Management Plan. His reason for doing so is flawed. He feels that the neighborhood is not capable of understanding the nuances of the matter before you, and that he, alone, know what is good for his District. When he tells people, “Be careful what you wish for.” he is saying that the residents of the affected neighborhood don’t know for what they are asking. I assure you that they do understand the ramifications of asking that Stock respect the existing C-3 zoning. One Naples is not simply a District 2 issue. It’s approval would send a message that for the Commissioners it’s “business as usual,” and the they have little concern for the “Miamification” of Collier County. It would represent the long-held pattern of the Board of County Commissioners supporting developers over neighborhoods. That must stop! I am asking you to vote to deny Stock’s proposed amendment to the Growth Management Plan. I cannot be more direct. You have for too long and for too often voted to allow developers to run slipshod over the wishes of your taxpaying constituents. I will be there on March 1st to hold your feet to the fire. __________________________ --------------------- From:Paula Leachman To:McDanielBill Subject:Vanderbilt neighborhood Date:Tuesday, February 16, 2021 4:22:22 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: On March 1 you and your fellow Commissioners will be hearing Stock Development’s application for One Naples. I am writing you today to express my strong opposition to the development as Stock has proposed it. I know full well that this development is not in our District, and that you generally tend to vote with the Commissioner in whose District the project lies. But, in this case I ask you to act independently. Residents of Commissioner Solis’ District have overwhelmingly shown their opposition. I know that you are aware of that as I know that you have received hundreds of emails telling you so. I believe that Commissioner Solis intends to vote in support of the Stock amendment to the Growth Management Plan. His reason for doing so is flawed. He feels that the neighborhood is not capable of understanding the nuances of the matter before you, and that he, alone, know what is good for his District. When he tells people, “Be careful what you wish for.” he is saying that the residents of the affected neighborhood don’t know for what they are asking. I assure you that they do understand the ramifications of asking that Stock respect the existing C-3 zoning. One Naples is not simply a District 2 issue. It’s approval would send a message that for the Commissioners it’s “business as usual,” and the they have little concern for the “Miamification” of Collier County. It would represent the long-held pattern of the Board of County Commissioners supporting developers over neighborhoods. That must stop! I am asking you to vote to deny Stock’s proposed amendment to the Growth Management Plan. I cannot be more direct. You have for too long and for too often voted to allow developers to run slipshod over the wishes of your taxpaying constituents. I will be there on March 1st to hold your feet to the fire. Vanderbilt beach is already crowded and Collier County beaches are being absorbed into private developments which do not support the public. Do the right thing and vote this down. Sincerely, Paula Leachman __________________________ --------------------- From:Richard Rowe To:McDanielBill Subject:Vanderbilt neighborhood Date:Tuesday, February 16, 2021 3:32:41 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: On March 1 you and your fellow Commissioners will be hearing Stock Development’s application for One Naples. I am writing you today to express my strong opposition to the development as Stock has proposed it. I know full well that this development is not in our District, and that you generally tend to vote with the Commissioner in whose District the project lies. But, in this case I ask you to act independently. Residents of Commissioner Solis’ District have overwhelmingly shown their opposition. I know that you are aware of that as I know that you have received hundreds of emails telling you so. I believe that Commissioner Solis intends to vote in support of the Stock amendment to the Growth Management Plan. His reason for doing so is flawed. He feels that the neighborhood is not capable of understanding the nuances of the matter before you, and that he, alone, know what is good for his District. When he tells people, “Be careful what you wish for.” he is saying that the residents of the affected neighborhood don’t know for what they are asking. I assure you that they do understand the ramifications of asking that Stock respect the existing C-3 zoning. One Naples is not simply a District 2 issue. It’s approval would send a message that for the Commissioners it’s “business as usual,” and the they have little concern for the “Miamification” of Collier County. It would represent the long-held pattern of the Board of County Commissioners supporting developers over neighborhoods. That must stop! I am asking you to vote to deny Stock’s proposed amendment to the Growth Management Plan. I cannot be more direct. You have for too long and for too often voted to allow developers to run slipshod over the wishes of your taxpaying constituents. I will be there on March 1st to hold your feet to the fire. __________________________ --------------------- From:Stephanie Fleming To:McDanielBill Subject:Vanderbilt neighborhood Date:Tuesday, February 16, 2021 3:24:47 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: On March 1 you and your fellow Commissioners will be hearing Stock Development’s application for One Naples. I am writing you today to express my strong opposition to the development as Stock has proposed it. I know full well that this development is not in our District, and that you generally tend to vote with the Commissioner in whose District the project lies. But, in this case I ask you to act independently. Residents of Commissioner Solis’ District have overwhelmingly shown their opposition. I know that you are aware of that as I know that you have received hundreds of emails telling you so. I believe that Commissioner Solis intends to vote in support of the Stock amendment to the Growth Management Plan. His reason for doing so is flawed. He feels that the neighborhood is not capable of understanding the nuances of the matter before you, and that he, alone, know what is good for his District. When he tells people, “Be careful what you wish for.” he is saying that the residents of the affected neighborhood don’t know for what they are asking. I assure you that they do understand the ramifications of asking that Stock respect the existing C-3 zoning. One Naples is not simply a District 2 issue. It’s approval would send a message that for the Commissioners it’s “business as usual,” and the they have little concern for the “Miamification” of Collier County. It would represent the long-held pattern of the Board of County Commissioners supporting developers over neighborhoods. That must stop! I am asking you to vote to deny Stock’s proposed amendment to the Growth Management Plan. I cannot be more direct. You have for too long and for too often voted to allow developers to run slipshod over the wishes of your taxpaying constituents. PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE DON'T RUIN OUR LOVELY VANDERBILT BEACH AREA! My daughter was married at La Playa and it was so lovely – and that large development will ruin the lovely area. The strip of the beach is already overcrowded. I live in Bay Colony and walk and bike up and down Vanderbilt Beach road. There is already tons of traffic and this will add more and I worry about the safety of myself and others. That development would be lovely in another area that is not already so dense. Please oppose it. Thank you for your consideration. Stephanie Fleming __________________________ --------------------- From:Christopher English To:McDanielBill Subject:Vanderbilt neighborhood Date:Wednesday, February 17, 2021 10:49:08 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: On March 1 you and your fellow Commissioners will be hearing Stock Development’s application for One Naples. I am writing you today to express my strong opposition to the development as Stock has proposed it. I know full well that this development is not in our District, and that you generally tend to vote with the Commissioner in whose District the project lies. But, in this case I ask you to act independently. Residents of Commissioner Solis’ District have overwhelmingly shown their opposition. I know that you are aware of that as I know that you have received hundreds of emails telling you so. I believe that Commissioner Solis intends to vote in support of the Stock amendment to the Growth Management Plan. His reason for doing so is flawed. He feels that the neighborhood is not capable of understanding the nuances of the matter before you, and that he, alone, know what is good for his District. When he tells people, “Be careful what you wish for.” he is saying that the residents of the affected neighborhood don’t know for what they are asking. I assure you that they do understand the ramifications of asking that Stock respect the existing C-3 zoning. One Naples is not simply a District 2 issue. It’s approval would send a message that for the Commissioners it’s “business as usual,” and the they have little concern for the “Miamification” of Collier County. It would represent the long-held pattern of the Board of County Commissioners supporting developers over neighborhoods. That must stop! I am asking you to vote to deny Stock’s proposed amendment to the Growth Management Plan. I cannot be more direct. You have for too long and for too often voted to allow developers to run slipshod over the wishes of your taxpaying constituents. I will be there on March 1st to hold your feet to the fire. __________________________ --------------------- From:Joan and Marc Saperstein To:McDanielBill Subject:Vanderbilt neighborhood Date:Wednesday, February 17, 2021 10:01:16 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: Dear Commissioner Taylor: On March 1 you and your fellow Commissioners will be hearing Stock Development’s application for One Naples. I am writing you today to express my strong opposition to the development as Stock has proposed it. I know full well that this development is not in your District, and that Commissioners generally tend to vote with the Commissioner in whose District the project lies. But, in this case I ask you to act independently. Residents of Commissioner Solis’ District have overwhelmingly shown their opposition. I know that you are aware of that as I know that you have received hundreds of emails telling you so. I believe that Commissioner Solis intends to vote in support of the Stock amendment to the Growth Management Plan. I am writing you today to express my strong opposition to the development as Stock has proposed it. It would add significantly to what is already a lot of traffic on Vanderbilt Beach Road west of Tamiami Trail. It would put a strain on Beach access and cause overcrowding at the beach itself making it unpleasant for everyone! In addition, it would completely change the tenor of our relaxed beach community. It would be an overbearing presence in our community. Frankly, knowing how much opposition there is to the project’s design and how you care for our Collier County, I am amazed that this is a hard decision for you. We understand the ramifications of asking that Stock respect the existing C-3 zoning, and I am asking you to vote to deny his proposed amendment to the Growth Plan. One Naples is not simply a District 2 issue. Its approval would send a message that it’s “business as usual,” and that the “Miamification” of Collier County will continue. That must stop! I am asking you to vote to deny Stock’s proposed amendment to the Growth Management Plan We will be there on March 1st, virtually. Sincerely, Joan and Marc Saperstein __________________________ __________________________ __________________________ --------------------- From:Kathryn Miller To:McDanielBill Subject:Vanderbilt neighborhood Date:Wednesday, February 17, 2021 9:53:04 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: On March 1 you and your fellow Commissioners will be hearing Stock Development’s application for One Naples. I am writing you today to express my strong opposition to the development as Stock has proposed it. I know full well that this development is not in our District, and that you generally tend to vote with the Commissioner in whose District the project lies. But, in this case I ask you to act independently. Residents of Commissioner Solis’ District have overwhelmingly shown their opposition. I know that you are aware of that as I know that you have received hundreds of emails telling you so. I believe that Commissioner Solis intends to vote in support of the Stock amendment to the Growth Management Plan. His reason for doing so is flawed. He feels that the neighborhood is not capable of understanding the nuances of the matter before you, and that he, alone, know what is good for his District. When he tells people, “Be careful what you wish for.” he is saying that the residents of the affected neighborhood don’t know for what they are asking. I assure you that they do understand the ramifications of asking that Stock respect the existing C-3 zoning. One Naples is not simply a District 2 issue. It’s approval would send a message that for the Commissioners it’s “business as usual,” and the they have little concern for the “Miamification” of Collier County. It would represent the long-held pattern of the Board of County Commissioners supporting developers over neighborhoods. That must stop! I am asking you to vote to deny Stock’s proposed amendment to the Growth Management Plan. I cannot be more direct. You have for too long and for too often voted to allow developers to run slipshod over the wishes of your taxpaying constituents. I will be there on March 1st to hold your feet to the fire. Kathryn Miller __________________________ --------------------- From:Burton Jean To:McDanielBill Subject:Vanderbilt neighborhood Date:Thursday, February 18, 2021 9:21:36 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: On March 1 you and your fellow Commissioners will be hearing Stock Development’s application for One Naples. I am writing you today to express my strong opposition to the development as Stock has proposed it. I know full well that this development is not in our District, and that you generally tend to vote with the Commissioner in whose District the project lies. But, in this case I ask you to act independently. Residents of Commissioner Solis’ District have overwhelmingly shown their opposition. I know that you are aware of that as I know that you have received hundreds of emails telling you so. I believe that Commissioner Solis intends to vote in support of the Stock amendment to the Growth Management Plan. His reason for doing so is flawed. He feels that the neighborhood is not capable of understanding the nuances of the matter before you, and that he, alone, know what is good for his District. When he tells people, “Be careful what you wish for.” he is saying that the residents of the affected neighborhood don’t know for what they are asking. I assure you that they do understand the ramifications of asking that Stock respect the existing C-3 zoning. One Naples is not simply a District 2 issue. It’s approval would send a message that for the Commissioners it’s “business as usual,” and the they have little concern for the “Miamification” of Collier County. It would represent the long-held pattern of the Board of County Commissioners supporting developers over neighborhoods. That must stop! I am asking you to vote to deny Stock’s proposed amendment to the Growth Management Plan. I cannot be more direct. You have for too long and for too often voted to allow developers to run slipshod over the wishes of your taxpaying constituents. I will be there on March 1st to hold your feet to the fire. Jean Burton __________________________ --------------------- From:Mary Silva To:McDanielBill Subject:Vanderbilt neighborhood Date:Thursday, February 18, 2021 1:33:07 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: On March 1 you and your fellow Commissioners will be hearing Stock Development’s application for One Naples. I am writing you today to express my strong opposition to the development as Stock has proposed it. I know full well that this development is not in our District, and that you generally tend to vote with the Commissioner in whose District the project lies. But, in this case I ask you to act independently. Residents of Commissioner Solis’ District have overwhelmingly shown their opposition. I know that you are aware of that as I know that you have received hundreds of emails telling you so. I believe that Commissioner Solis intends to vote in support of the Stock amendment to the Growth Management Plan. His reason for doing so is flawed. He feels that the neighborhood is not capable of understanding the nuances of the matter before you, and that he, alone, know what is good for his District. When he tells people, “Be careful what you wish for.” he is saying that the residents of the affected neighborhood don’t know for what they are asking. I assure you that they do understand the ramifications of asking that Stock respect the existing C-3 zoning. One Naples is not simply a District 2 issue. It’s approval would send a message that for the Commissioners it’s “business as usual,” and the they have little concern for the “Miamification” of Collier County. It would represent the long-held pattern of the Board of County Commissioners supporting developers over neighborhoods. That must stop! I am asking you to vote to deny Stock’s proposed amendment to the Growth Management Plan. I cannot be more direct. You have for too long and for too often voted to allow developers to run slipshod over the wishes of your taxpaying constituents. I will be there on March 1st to hold your feet to the fire. __________________________ --------------------- From:Katharine McCullough To:McDanielBill Subject:Vanderbilt neighborhood Date:Thursday, February 18, 2021 2:09:07 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: On March 1 you and your fellow Commissioners will be hearing Stock Development’s application for One Naples. I am writing you today to express my strong opposition to the development as Stock has proposed it. I know full well that this development is not in our District, and that you generally tend to vote with the Commissioner in whose District the project lies. But, in this case I ask you to act independently. Residents of Commissioner Solis’ District have overwhelmingly shown their opposition. I know that you are aware of that as I know that you have received hundreds of emails telling you so. I believe that Commissioner Solis intends to vote in support of the Stock amendment to the Growth Management Plan. His reason for doing so is flawed. He feels that the neighborhood is not capable of understanding the nuances of the matter before you, and that he, alone, know what is good for his District. When he tells people, “Be careful what you wish for.” he is saying that the residents of the affected neighborhood don’t know for what they are asking. I assure you that they do understand the ramifications of asking that Stock respect the existing C-3 zoning. One Naples is not simply a District 2 issue. It’s approval would send a message that for the Commissioners it’s “business as usual,” and the they have little concern for the “Miamification” of Collier County. It would represent the long-held pattern of the Board of County Commissioners supporting developers over neighborhoods. That must stop! I am asking you to vote to deny Stock’s proposed amendment to the Growth Management Plan. I cannot be more direct. You have for too long and for too often voted to allow developers to run slipshod over the wishes of your taxpaying constituents. I will be there on March 1st to hold your feet to the fire. Kay McCullough __________________________ --------------------- From:Judith L Sweeney To:McDanielBill Subject:Vanderbilt neighborhood Date:Tuesday, February 23, 2021 2:30:04 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: On March 1 you and your fellow Commissioners will be hearing Stock Development’s application for One Naples. I am writing you today to express my strong opposition to the development as Stock has proposed it. I know full well that this development is not in our District, and that you generally tend to vote with the Commissioner in whose District the project lies. But, in this case I ask you to act independently. Residents of Commissioner Solis’ District have overwhelmingly shown their opposition. I know that you are aware of that as I know that you have received hundreds of emails telling you so. I believe that Commissioner Solis intends to vote in support of the Stock amendment to the Growth Management Plan. His reason for doing so is flawed. He feels that the neighborhood is not capable of understanding the nuances of the matter before you, and that he, alone, know what is good for his District. When he tells people, “Be careful what you wish for.” he is saying that the residents of the affected neighborhood don’t know for what they are asking. I assure you that they do understand the ramifications of asking that Stock respect the existing C-3 zoning. One Naples is not simply a District 2 issue. It’s approval would send a message that for the Commissioners it’s “business as usual,” and the they have little concern for the “Miamification” of Collier County. It would represent the long-held pattern of the Board of County Commissioners supporting developers over neighborhoods. That must stop! I am asking you to vote to deny Stock’s proposed amendment to the Growth Management Plan. I cannot be more direct. You have for too long and for too often voted to allow developers to run slipshod over the wishes of your taxpaying constituents. I will be there on March 1st to hold your feet to the fire. We have already lost a major old Naples landmark to development-Naples Beach Club and Resort!! Sincerely, Paul and Judith Sweeney __________________________ --------------------- From:Candice Lopez Schimkat To:McDanielBill Subject:Vanderbilt neighborhood Date:Tuesday, February 23, 2021 10:49:47 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: On March 1 you and your fellow Commissioners will be hearing Stock Development’s application for One Naples. I am writing you today to express my strong opposition to the development as Stock has proposed it and ask that you VOTE NO. I know full well that this development is not in our District, and that you generally tend to vote with the Commissioner in whose District the project lies. But, in this case I ask you to act independently and support all the residents of Collier County and VOTE NO. Residents of Commissioner Solis’ District have overwhelmingly shown their opposition. I know that you are aware of that as I know that you have received hundreds of emails telling you so. I believe that Commissioner Solis intends to vote in support of the Stock amendment to the Growth Management Plan. His reason for doing so is flawed a d I trust you have come to see that as well. He feels that the neighborhood is not capable of understanding the nuances of the matter before you, and that he, alone, know what is good for his District. When he tells people, “Be careful what you wish for.” he is saying that the residents of the affected neighborhood don’t know for what they are asking. I assure you that WE do understand the ramifications of asking that Stock respect the existing C-3 zoning. One Naples is not simply a District 2 issue. It’s approval would send a message that for the Commissioners it’s “business as usual,” and the they have little concern for the “Miamification” of Collier County. It would represent the long-held pattern of the Board of County Commissioners supporting developers over neighborhoods. That must stop! I am asking you to vote to DENY Stock’s proposed amendment to the Growth Management Plan. I cannot be more direct. You have for too long and for too often voted to allow developers to run slipshod over the wishes of your taxpaying constituents. PLEASE DO WHAT IS RIGHT FOR THE RESIDENTS and save Vanderbilt Beach by voting NO. Doing what is right is often hard but in the end it is always better to be on the side of right. I will be there on March 1st to hold your feet to the fire. Candice Lopez Schimkat __________________________ --------------------- From:Pam Rons To:McDanielBill Subject:Vanderbilt neighborhood Date:Tuesday, February 23, 2021 10:29:42 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: I live in The Vineyards, District 3, and for the past 8 years regularly walk in the Vanderbilt Beach neighborhoods and often use the Vanderbilt beach. I strongly oppose the STOCK DEVELOPMENT proposed BUILDING application to erect towers TWICE the zoned height permitted; that encroaches on reasonable and necessary setbacks, and also proposed a HOTEL without ANY assessment of the increased traffic/damage this could cause to the neighborhoods and beach areas. Finally, there is NO ASSESSMENT as to how a MARINA would impact and possibly damage the delicate wildlife and entire beach area so no Marina should ever be considered without a full assessment and public scrutiny. The Stock Development as proposed is hostile and damaging far far outside the strict parameters of the zoning rules expressly designed to PROTECT the rights of property owners already in the neighborhood, and the residents and visitors to this area who enjoy the benefits of low rise buildings, limiting density of residents and their cars, and can safely walk/bike near existing buildings that have APPROPRIATE setbacks. WHY would any Collier County Commissioner consider waiving these rules when it would damage every single tangible benefit the rules were passed to protect: views, pedestrian safety, density, traffic, wildlife protection, property values. I was an attorney for over 30 years and clearly understand the need to insist that Stock respect the existing C-3 zoning. I ask that you vote to deny his proposed amendment to the Growth Management Plan. Despite the pandemic, I will try to attend the hearing on 3/1 because this issue is very important to the community. Sincerely, Pam Rons 754 Vistana Circle Naples __________________________ --------------------- From:Vickie Rydz To:McDanielBill Subject:Vanderbilt neighborhood Date:Tuesday, February 23, 2021 7:56:01 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: On March 1 you and your fellow Commissioners will be hearing Stock Development’s application for One Naples. I am writing you today to express my strong opposition to the development as Stock has proposed it. I know full well that this development is not in your District, and that you generally tend to vote with the Commissioner in whose District the project lies. But, in this case I ask you to act independently. Residents of Commissioner Solis’ District have overwhelmingly shown. I believe that Commissioner Solis intends to vote in support of the Stock amendment to the Growth Management Plan. He feels that the neighborhood is not capable of understanding the nuances of the matter before you, and that he, alone, know what is good for his District. When he tells people, “Be careful what you wish for.” he is saying that the residents (like me) of the affected neighborhood don’t know for what they are asking. I assure you that I do understand the ramifications of asking that Stock respect the existing C-3 zoning. One Naples is not simply a District 2 issue. It’s approval would send a message that for the Commissioners it’s “business as usual,” and the they have little concern for the “Miamification” of Collier County. I am asking you to vote to deny Stock’s proposed amendment to the Growth Management Plan. Sincerely Vickie __________________________ --------------------- From:Louise Novis To:McDanielBill Subject:Vanderbilt neighborhood Date:Monday, February 22, 2021 10:16:08 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: On March 1 you and your fellow Commissioners will be hearing Stock Development’s application for One Naples. I am writing you today to express my strong opposition to the development as Stock has proposed it. I know full well that this development is not in our District, and that you generally tend to vote with the Commissioner in whose District the project lies. But, in this case I ask you to act independently. Residents of Commissioner Solis’ District have overwhelmingly shown their opposition. I know that you are aware of that as I know that you have received hundreds of emails telling you so. I believe that Commissioner Solis intends to vote in support of the Stock amendment to the Growth Management Plan. His reason for doing so is flawed. He feels that the neighborhood is not capable of understanding the nuances of the matter before you, and that he, alone, know what is good for his District. When he tells people, “Be careful what you wish for.” he is saying that the residents of the affected neighborhood don’t know for what they are asking. I assure you that they do understand the ramifications of asking that Stock respect the existing C-3 zoning. One Naples is not simply a District 2 issue. It’s approval would send a message that for the Commissioners it’s “business as usual,” and the they have little concern for the “Miamification” of Collier County. It would represent the long-held pattern of the Board of County Commissioners supporting developers over neighborhoods. That must stop! I am asking you to vote to deny Stock’s proposed amendment to the Growth Management Plan. I cannot be more direct. You have for too long and for too often voted to allow developers to run slipshod over the wishes of your taxpaying constituents. I will be there on March 1st to hold your feet to the fire. __________________________ --------------------- From:Catherine V Kelley To:McDanielBill Subject:Vanderbilt neighborhood Date:Monday, February 22, 2021 9:50:10 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: On March 1 you and your fellow Commissioners will be hearing Stock Development’s application for One Naples. I am writing you today to express my strong opposition to the development as Stock has proposed it. I know full well that this development is not in our District, and that you generally tend to vote with the Commissioner in whose District the project lies. But, in this case I ask you to act independently. Residents of Commissioner Solis’ District have overwhelmingly shown their opposition. I know that you are aware of that as I know that you have received hundreds of emails telling you so. I believe that Commissioner Solis intends to vote in support of the Stock amendment to the Growth Management Plan. His reason for doing so is flawed. He feels that the neighborhood is not capable of understanding the nuances of the matter before you, and that he, alone, know what is good for his District. When he tells people, “Be careful what you wish for.” he is saying that the residents of the affected neighborhood don’t know for what they are asking. I assure you that they do understand the ramifications of asking that Stock respect the existing C-3 zoning. One Naples is not simply a District 2 issue. It’s approval would send a message that for the Commissioners it’s “business as usual,” and the they have little concern for the “Miamification” of Collier County. It would represent the long-held pattern of the Board of County Commissioners supporting developers over neighborhoods. That must stop! I am asking you to vote to deny Stock’s proposed amendment to the Growth Management Plan. I cannot be more direct. You have for too long and for too often voted to allow developers to run slipshod over the wishes of your taxpaying constituents. I will be there on March 1st to hold your feet to the fire. Catherine Kelley __________________________ --------------------- From:Hannah and Melville Young To:McDanielBill Subject:Vanderbilt neighborhood Date:Monday, February 22, 2021 8:30:56 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: On March 1 you and your fellow Commissioners will be hearing Stock Development’s application for One Naples. I am writing you today to express my strong opposition to the development as Stock has proposed it. I know full well that this development is not in our District, and that you generally tend to vote with the Commissioner in whose District the project lies. But, in this case I ask you to act independently. Residents of Commissioner Solis’ District have overwhelmingly shown their opposition. I know that you are aware of that as I know that you have received hundreds of emails telling you so. I believe that Commissioner Solis intends to vote in support of the Stock amendment to the Growth Management Plan. His reason for doing so is flawed. He feels that the neighborhood is not capable of understanding the nuances of the matter before you, and that he, alone, know what is good for his District. When he tells people, “Be careful what you wish for.” he is saying that the residents of the affected neighborhood don’t know for what they are asking. I assure you that they do understand the ramifications of asking that Stock respect the existing C-3 zoning. One Naples is not simply a District 2 issue. It’s approval would send a message that for the Commissioners it’s “business as usual,” and the they have little concern for the “Miamification” of Collier County. It would represent the long-held pattern of the Board of County Commissioners supporting developers over neighborhoods. That must stop! I am asking you to vote to deny Stock’s proposed amendment to the Growth Management Plan. I cannot be more direct. You have for too long and for too often voted to allow developers to run slipshod over the wishes of your taxpaying constituents. I will be there on March 1st to hold your feet to the fire. Hannah and Melville Young __________________________ --------------------- From:Diane R Meyer To:McDanielBill Subject:Vanderbilt neighborhood Date:Sunday, February 21, 2021 6:10:33 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: I beg of you to vote NO on this One Naples project—it will destroy the neighborhood and violates so many of our rules and zoning regulations! PLEASE—we are a total traffic jam right now–PLEASE do not make it worse with this project!!! On March 1 you and your fellow Commissioners will be hearing Stock Development’s application for One Naples. I am writing you today to express my strong opposition to the development as Stock has proposed it. I know full well that this development is not in our District, and that you generally tend to vote with the Commissioner in whose District the project lies. But, in this case I ask you to act independently. Residents of Commissioner Solis’ District have overwhelmingly shown their opposition. I know that you are aware of that as I know that you have received hundreds of emails telling you so. I believe that Commissioner Solis intends to vote in support of the Stock amendment to the Growth Management Plan. His reason for doing so is flawed. He feels that the neighborhood is not capable of understanding the nuances of the matter before you, and that he, alone, know what is good for his District. When he tells people, “Be careful what you wish for.” he is saying that the residents of the affected neighborhood don’t know for what they are asking. I assure you that they do understand the ramifications of asking that Stock respect the existing C-3 zoning. One Naples is not simply a District 2 issue. It’s approval would send a message that for the Commissioners it’s “business as usual,” and the they have little concern for the “Miamification” of Collier County. It would represent the long-held pattern of the Board of County Commissioners supporting developers over neighborhoods. That must stop! I am asking you to vote to deny Stock’s proposed amendment to the Growth Management Plan. I cannot be more direct. You have for too long and for too often voted to allow developers to run slipshod over the wishes of your taxpaying constituents. I will be there on March 1st to hold your feet to the fire. __________________________ --------------------- From:SUSAN ECKERT To:McDanielBill Subject:Vanderbilt neighborhood Date:Sunday, February 21, 2021 12:07:56 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: On March 1 you and your fellow Commissioners will be hearing Stock Development’s application for One Naples. I am writing you today to express my strong opposition to the development as Stock has proposed it. I know full well that this development is not in our District, and that you generally tend to vote with the Commissioner in whose District the project lies. But, in this case I ask you to act independently. Residents of Commissioner Solis’ District have overwhelmingly shown their opposition. I know that you are aware of that as I know that you have received hundreds of emails telling you so. I believe that Commissioner Solis intends to vote in support of the Stock amendment to the Growth Management Plan. His reason for doing so is flawed. He feels that the neighborhood is not capable of understanding the nuances of the matter before you, and that he, alone, know what is good for his District. When he tells people, “Be careful what you wish for.” he is saying that the residents of the affected neighborhood don’t know for what they are asking. I assure you that they do understand the ramifications of asking that Stock respect the existing C-3 zoning. One Naples is not simply a District 2 issue. It’s approval would send a message that for the Commissioners it’s “business as usual,” and the they have little concern for the “Miamification” of Collier County. It would represent the long-held pattern of the Board of County Commissioners supporting developers over neighborhoods. That must stop! I am asking you to vote to deny Stock’s proposed amendment to the Growth Management Plan. I cannot be more direct. You have for too long and for too often voted to allow developers to run slipshod over the wishes of your taxpaying constituents. I will be there on March 1st to hold your feet to the fire. _________SUSAN ECKERT_________________ --------------------- From:Edwin J. Eckert To:McDanielBill Subject:Vanderbilt neighborhood Date:Sunday, February 21, 2021 11:39:14 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: On March 1 you and your fellow Commissioners will be hearing Stock Development’s application for One Naples. I am writing you today to express my strong opposition to the development as Stock has proposed it. I know full well that this development is not in our District, and that you generally tend to vote with the Commissioner in whose District the project lies. But, in this case I ask you to act independently. Residents of Commissioner Solis’ District have overwhelmingly shown their opposition. I know that you are aware of that as I know that you have received hundreds of emails telling you so. I believe that Commissioner Solis intends to vote in support of the Stock amendment to the Growth Management Plan. His reason for doing so is flawed. He feels that the neighborhood is not capable of understanding the nuances of the matter before you, and that he, alone, know what is good for his District. When he tells people, “Be careful what you wish for.” he is saying that the residents of the affected neighborhood don’t know for what they are asking. I assure you that they do understand the ramifications of asking that Stock respect the existing C-3 zoning. One Naples is not simply a District 2 issue. It’s approval would send a message that for the Commissioners it’s “business as usual,” and the they have little concern for the “Miamification” of Collier County. It would represent the long-held pattern of the Board of County Commissioners supporting developers over neighborhoods. That must stop! I am asking you to vote to deny Stock’s proposed amendment to the Growth Management Plan. I cannot be more direct. You have for too long and for too often voted to allow developers to run slipshod over the wishes of your taxpaying constituents. I will be there on March 1st to hold your feet to the fire. _______Edwin J. Eckert___________________ --------------------- From:Janice Moran To:McDanielBill Subject:Vanderbilt neighborhood Date:Sunday, February 21, 2021 10:59:41 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: On March 1 you and your fellow Commissioners will be hearing Stock Development’s application for One Naples. I am writing you today to express my strong opposition to the development as Stock has proposed it. I know full well that this development is not in our District, and that you generally tend to vote with the Commissioner in whose District the project lies. But, in this case I ask you to act independently. Residents of Commissioner Solis’ District have overwhelmingly shown their opposition. I know that you are aware of that as I know that you have received hundreds of emails telling you so. I believe that Commissioner Solis intends to vote in support of the Stock amendment to the Growth Management Plan. His reason for doing so is flawed. He feels that the neighborhood is not capable of understanding the nuances of the matter before you, and that he, alone, know what is good for his District. When he tells people, “Be careful what you wish for.” he is saying that the residents of the affected neighborhood don’t know for what they are asking. I assure you that they do understand the ramifications of asking that Stock respect the existing C-3 zoning. One Naples is not simply a District 2 issue. It’s approval would send a message that for the Commissioners it’s “business as usual,” and the they have little concern for the “Miamification” of Collier County. It would represent the long-held pattern of the Board of County Commissioners supporting developers over neighborhoods. That must stop! I am asking you to vote to deny Stock’s proposed amendment to the Growth Management Plan. I cannot be more direct. You have for too long and for too often voted to allow developers to run slipshod over the wishes of your taxpaying constituents. I will be there on March 1st to hold your feet to the fire. __________________________ --------------------- From:Robert Schultheis To:McDanielBill Subject:Vanderbilt neighborhood Date:Saturday, February 20, 2021 6:09:36 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: On March 1 you and your fellow Commissioners will be hearing Stock Development’s application for One Naples. I am writing you today to express my strong opposition to the development as Stock has proposed it. I know full well that this development is not in our District, and that you generally tend to vote with the Commissioner in whose District the project lies. But, in this case I ask you to act independently. Residents of Commissioner Solis’ District have overwhelmingly shown their opposition. I know that you are aware of that as I know that you have received hundreds of emails telling you so. I believe that Commissioner Solis intends to vote in support of the Stock amendment to the Growth Management Plan. His reason for doing so is flawed. He feels that the neighborhood is not capable of understanding the nuances of the matter before you, and that he, alone, know what is good for his District. When he tells people, “Be careful what you wish for.” he is saying that the residents of the affected neighborhood don’t know for what they are asking. I assure you that they do understand the ramifications of asking that Stock respect the existing C-3 zoning. One Naples is not simply a District 2 issue. It’s approval would send a message that for the Commissioners it’s “business as usual,” and the they have little concern for the “Miamification” of Collier County. It would represent the long-held pattern of the Board of County Commissioners supporting developers over neighborhoods. That must stop! I am asking you to vote to deny Stock’s proposed amendment to the Growth Management Plan. Robert Schultheis __________________________ --------------------- From:Robert Schultheis To:McDanielBill Subject:Vanderbilt neighborhood Date:Saturday, February 20, 2021 6:07:18 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: On March 1 you and your fellow Commissioners will be hearing Stock Development’s application for One Naples. I am writing you today to express my strong opposition to the development as Stock has proposed it. I know full well that this development is not in our District, and that you generally tend to vote with the Commissioner in whose District the project lies. But, in this case I ask you to act independently. Residents of Commissioner Solis’ District have overwhelmingly shown their opposition. I know that you are aware of that as I know that you have received hundreds of emails telling you so. I believe that Commissioner Solis intends to vote in support of the Stock amendment to the Growth Management Plan. His reason for doing so is flawed. He feels that the neighborhood is not capable of understanding the nuances of the matter before you, and that he, alone, know what is good for his District. When he tells people, “Be careful what you wish for.” he is saying that the residents of the affected neighborhood don’t know for what they are asking. I assure you that they do understand the ramifications of asking that Stock respect the existing C-3 zoning. One Naples is not simply a District 2 issue. It’s approval would send a message that for the Commissioners it’s “business as usual,” and the they have little concern for the “Miamification” of Collier County. It would represent the long-held pattern of the Board of County Commissioners supporting developers over neighborhoods. That must stop! I am asking you to vote to deny Stock’s proposed amendment to the Growth Management Plan. I cannot be more direct. You have for too long and for too often voted to allow developers to run slipshod over the wishes of your taxpaying constituents. I will be there on March 1st to hold your feet to the fire. __________________________ --------------------- From:Robert Schultheis To:McDanielBill Subject:Vanderbilt neighborhood Date:Saturday, February 20, 2021 6:05:29 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: On March 1 you and your fellow Commissioners will be hearing Stock Development’s application for One Naples. I am writing you today to express my strong opposition to the development as Stock has proposed it. I know full well that this development is not in our District, and that you generally tend to vote with the Commissioner in whose District the project lies. But, in this case I ask you to act independently. Residents of Commissioner Solis’ District have overwhelmingly shown their opposition. I know that you are aware of that as I know that you have received hundreds of emails telling you so. I believe that Commissioner Solis intends to vote in support of the Stock amendment to the Growth Management Plan. His reason for doing so is flawed. He feels that the neighborhood is not capable of understanding the nuances of the matter before you, and that he, alone, know what is good for his District. When he tells people, “Be careful what you wish for.” he is saying that the residents of the affected neighborhood don’t know for what they are asking. I assure you that they do understand the ramifications of asking that Stock respect the existing C-3 zoning. One Naples is not simply a District 2 issue. It’s approval would send a message that for the Commissioners it’s “business as usual,” and the they have little concern for the “Miamification” of Collier County. It would represent the long-held pattern of the Board of County Commissioners supporting developers over neighborhoods. That must stop! I am asking you to vote to deny Stock’s proposed amendment to the Growth Management Plan. I cannot be more direct. You have for too long and for too often voted to allow developers to run slipshod over the wishes of your taxpaying constituents. Robert Schultheis _____________________ --------------------- From:Michèle Geoffrion To:McDanielBill Subject:Vanderbilt neighborhood Date:Saturday, February 20, 2021 10:28:35 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: On March 1 you and your fellow Commissioners will be hearing Stock Development’s application for One Naples. I am writing you today to express my strong opposition to the development as Stock has proposed it. I know full well that this development is not in our District, and that you generally tend to vote with the Commissioner in whose District the project lies. But, in this case I ask you to act independently. Residents of Commissioner Solis’ District have overwhelmingly shown their opposition. I know that you are aware of that as I know that you have received hundreds of emails telling you so. I believe that Commissioner Solis intends to vote in support of the Stock amendment to the Growth Management Plan. His reason for doing so is flawed. He feels that the neighborhood is not capable of understanding the nuances of the matter before you, and that he, alone, know what is good for his District. When he tells people, “Be careful what you wish for.” he is saying that the residents of the affected neighborhood don’t know for what they are asking. I assure you that they do understand the ramifications of asking that Stock respect the existing C-3 zoning. One Naples is not simply a District 2 issue. It’s approval would send a message that for the Commissioners it’s “business as usual,” and the they have little concern for the “Miamification” of Collier County. It would represent the long-held pattern of the Board of County Commissioners supporting developers over neighborhoods. That must stop! I am asking you to vote to deny Stock’s proposed amendment to the Growth Management Plan. I cannot be more direct. You have for too long and for too often voted to allow developers to run slipshod over the wishes of your taxpaying constituents. I will be there on March 1st to hold your feet to the fire. Michèle Geoffrion __________________________ --------------------- From:Francis Terrault To:McDanielBill Subject:Vanderbilt neighborhood Date:Saturday, February 20, 2021 9:55:40 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: On March 1 you and your fellow Commissioners will be hearing Stock Development’s application for One Naples. I am writing you today to express my strong opposition to the development as Stock has proposed it. I know full well that this development is not in our District, and that you generally tend to vote with the Commissioner in whose District the project lies. But, in this case I ask you to act independently. Residents of Commissioner Solis’ District have overwhelmingly shown their opposition. I know that you are aware of that as I know that you have received hundreds of emails telling you so. I believe that Commissioner Solis intends to vote in support of the Stock amendment to the Growth Management Plan. His reason for doing so is flawed. He feels that the neighborhood is not capable of understanding the nuances of the matter before you, and that he, alone, know what is good for his District. When he tells people, “Be careful what you wish for.” he is saying that the residents of the affected neighborhood don’t know for what they are asking. I assure you that they do understand the ramifications of asking that Stock respect the existing C-3 zoning. One Naples is not simply a District 2 issue. It’s approval would send a message that for the Commissioners it’s “business as usual,” and the they have little concern for the “Miamification” of Collier County. It would represent the long-held pattern of the Board of County Commissioners supporting developers over neighborhoods. That must stop! I am asking you to vote to deny Stock’s proposed amendment to the Growth Management Plan. I cannot be more direct. You have for too long and for too often voted to allow developers to run slipshod over the wishes of your taxpaying constituents. I will be there on March 1st to hold your feet to the fire. Francis Terrault __________________________ --------------------- From:Martin Terrault To:McDanielBill Subject:Vanderbilt neighborhood Date:Saturday, February 20, 2021 9:54:28 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: On March 1 you and your fellow Commissioners will be hearing Stock Development’s application for One Naples. I am writing you today to express my strong opposition to the development as Stock has proposed it. I know full well that this development is not in our District, and that you generally tend to vote with the Commissioner in whose District the project lies. But, in this case I ask you to act independently. Residents of Commissioner Solis’ District have overwhelmingly shown their opposition. I know that you are aware of that as I know that you have received hundreds of emails telling you so. I believe that Commissioner Solis intends to vote in support of the Stock amendment to the Growth Management Plan. His reason for doing so is flawed. He feels that the neighborhood is not capable of understanding the nuances of the matter before you, and that he, alone, know what is good for his District. When he tells people, “Be careful what you wish for.” he is saying that the residents of the affected neighborhood don’t know for what they are asking. I assure you that they do understand the ramifications of asking that Stock respect the existing C-3 zoning. One Naples is not simply a District 2 issue. It’s approval would send a message that for the Commissioners it’s “business as usual,” and the they have little concern for the “Miamification” of Collier County. It would represent the long-held pattern of the Board of County Commissioners supporting developers over neighborhoods. That must stop! I am asking you to vote to deny Stock’s proposed amendment to the Growth Management Plan. I cannot be more direct. You have for too long and for too often voted to allow developers to run slipshod over the wishes of your taxpaying constituents. I will be there on March 1st to hold your feet to the fire. Martin Terrault __________________________ --------------------- From:Toby Husserl To:McDanielBill Subject:Vanderbilt neighborhood Date:Friday, February 19, 2021 7:20:37 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: On March 1 you and your fellow Commissioners will be hearing Stock Development’s application for One Naples. I am writing you today to express my strong opposition to the development as Stock has proposed it. I know full well that this development is not in our District, and that you generally tend to vote with the Commissioner in whose District the project lies. But, in this case I ask you to act independently. Residents of Commissioner Solis’ District have overwhelmingly shown their opposition. I know that you are aware of that as I know that you have received hundreds of emails telling you so. I believe that Commissioner Solis intends to vote in support of the Stock amendment to the Growth Management Plan. His reason for doing so is flawed. He feels that the neighborhood is not capable of understanding the nuances of the matter before you, and that he, alone, know what is good for his District. When he tells people, “Be careful what you wish for.” he is saying that the residents of the affected neighborhood don’t know for what they are asking. I assure you that they do understand the ramifications of asking that Stock respect the existing C-3 zoning. One Naples is not simply a District 2 issue. It’s approval would send a message that for the Commissioners it’s “business as usual,” and the they have little concern for the “Miamification” of Collier County. It would represent the long-held pattern of the Board of County Commissioners supporting developers over neighborhoods. That must stop! I am asking you to vote to deny Stock’s proposed amendment to the Growth Management Plan. I cannot be more direct. You have for too long and for too often voted to allow developers to run slipshod over the wishes of your taxpaying constituents. I will be there on March 1st to hold your feet to the fire. __________________________ --------------------- From:Janice Wieland To:McDanielBill Subject:Vanderbilt neighborhood Date:Wednesday, February 24, 2021 1:17:03 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: On March 1 you and your fellow Commissioners will be hearing Stock Development’s application for One Naples. I am writing you today to express my strong opposition to the development as Stock has proposed it. I know full well that this development is not in our District, and that you generally tend to vote with the Commissioner in whose District the project lies. But, in this case I ask you to act independently. Residents of Commissioner Solis’ District have overwhelmingly shown their opposition. I know that you are aware of that as I know that you have received hundreds of emails telling you so. I believe that Commissioner Solis intends to vote in support of the Stock amendment to the Growth Management Plan. His reason for doing so is flawed. He feels that the neighborhood is not capable of understanding the nuances of the matter before you, and that he, alone, know what is good for his District. When he tells people, “Be careful what you wish for.” he is saying that the residents of the affected neighborhood don’t know for what they are asking. I assure you that they do understand the ramifications of asking that Stock respect the existing C-3 zoning. One Naples is not simply a District 2 issue. It’s approval would send a message that for the Commissioners it’s “business as usual,” and the they have little concern for the “Miamification” of Collier County. It would represent the long-held pattern of the Board of County Commissioners supporting developers over neighborhoods. That must stop! I am asking you to vote to deny Stock’s proposed amendment to the Growth Management Plan. I cannot be more direct. You have for too long and for too often voted to allow developers to run slipshod over the wishes of your taxpaying constituents. I will be there on March 1st to hold your feet to the fire. __________________________ --------------------- From:Margaret Conroy To:McDanielBill Subject:Vanderbilt neighborhood Date:Wednesday, February 24, 2021 7:36:41 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: On March 1 you and your fellow Commissioners will be hearing Stock Development’s application for One Naples. I am writing you today to express my strong opposition to the development as Stock has proposed it. I know full well that this development is not in our District, and that you generally tend to vote with the Commissioner in whose District the project lies. But, in this case I ask you to act independently. Residents of Commissioner Solis’ District have overwhelmingly shown their opposition. I know that you are aware of that as I know that you have received hundreds of emails telling you so. I believe that Commissioner Solis intends to vote in support of the Stock amendment to the Growth Management Plan. His reason for doing so is flawed. He feels that the neighborhood is not capable of understanding the nuances of the matter before you, and that he, alone, know what is good for his District. When he tells people, “Be careful what you wish for.” he is saying that the residents of the affected neighborhood don’t know for what they are asking. I assure you that they do understand the ramifications of asking that Stock respect the existing C-3 zoning. One Naples is not simply a District 2 issue. It’s approval would send a message that for the Commissioners it’s “business as usual,” and the they have little concern for the “Miamification” of Collier County. It would represent the long-held pattern of the Board of County Commissioners supporting developers over neighborhoods. That must stop! I am asking you to vote to deny Stock’s proposed amendment to the Growth Management Plan. I cannot be more direct. You have for too long and for too often voted to allow developers to run slipshod over the wishes of your taxpaying constituents. I will be there on March 1st to hold your feet to the fire. __________________________ --------------------- From:Terri L Hemmelgarn To:McDanielBill Subject:Vanderbilt neighborhood Date:Wednesday, February 24, 2021 6:56:57 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: On March 1 you and your fellow Commissioners will be hearing Stock Development’s application for One Naples. I am writing you today to express my strong opposition to the development as Stock has proposed it and to urge you to vote NO to this proposal. I am writing to express my concern about years, decades really, of County Commissioners putting developers ahead of neighborhoods. Your predecessor was the perfect example. It is true that Stock Development was good to District 1. I have heard that Stock is a good developer, generally recognizing the relationship between what is good for the community with his need to make a profit. But I am astonished by what he is trying to do in District 2 at Vanderbilt Beach. I am not one of your constituents, but I am sure that i don't want such a project in my neighborhood. Voting against Stock’s request for an amendment to the Growth Management Plan will send him back to the drawing board. Perhaps he can come up with a plan that is more suited to the Vanderbilt Beach community. You have the chance to deliver a message that goes Far beyond Vanderbilt Beach. A vote to deny would deliver a message that you are for all the residents of the County and that you stand against the “Miamification” of all neighborhoods in all Districts. I live on Vanderbilt Beach–this is my neighborhood and it is a small close knit community. You only need to drive or walk through on any given day to see people out walking their dogs, biking, strolling the beach, and generally enjoying the ambiance of a smaller community within Naples. During the high season, the numbers swell with most residents and their guests enjoying the area, however you only need to drive down Vanderbilt Beach road on a weekend or during the busy season to see how overloaded the area becomes. Too many cars crowding the roads that are lined with residents walking and biking make it particularly dangerous to pedestrians and cyclists and the beach becomes way overcrowded. The cars line up down the road, the garage closes, and the stress on the streets and the beach is quite apparent. Last year-in an unusual situation, during the Co-vid shutdown of the beach, there were many residents already here, and then came an onslaught of people from other areas in the state when we opened and they were still closed. And though it was awful it served to warn the residents of how it could be all the time if this plan is allowed to go forward!! Obviously you know that as our beaches were briefly opened and then promptly closed again. The crowds became too large and unruly, leaving the area overcrowded, with the crowds leaving much trash all along the beach and private property when they left. On the beach side of our building, we had numerous incidences of people entering private property to relieve themselves and disrobing to change into street clothes because they didn't want to walk to the public restrooms or didn't want to wait in line to use them. We hauled in and threw away clothing, trash, bottles, cans, coolers, tents, etc that beachgoers left after a day of overcrowding on the beach. The trash cans at the public access areas were also overloaded and insufficient. I believe that the facilities that are available to the public in the Vanderbilt Beach area were designed and built to manage the crowds that come for the MUCH of the time based on the amount of land and space that are available. BUT, they are STRESSED at ANY PEAK period of use. That does not include just the highest weeks of "spring break" but also most weekends and holidays. Putting this large of a residential project in that place is absolutely wrong for the area. I do not object to a smaller project that could enhance the area. I walk to all of the local restaurants and amenities in the area and love that it is so pedestrian friendly. That is why we invested money into buying a property there. Putting these tall buildings in this area and also adding so significantly to the traffic , overcrowding on land and also the increase in the number of commercial docks will absolutely overload this neighborhood and the quiet lagoon and endanger the peace and tranquility of the bay as well as put the local residents and wildlife in danger. THIS PROJECT IS WRONG FOR THIS COMMUNITY ON SO MANY LEVELS! The zoning was put in place for a reason and there is no reason to change that now just because a developer has made a bad investment decision. I believe that Commissioner Solis intends to vote in support of the Stock amendment to the Growth Management Plan. His reason for doing so is flawed. He feels that the neighborhood is not capable of understanding the nuances of the matter before you, and that he, alone, know what is good for his District. When he tells people, “Be careful what you wish for.” he is saying that the residents of the affected neighborhood don’t know for what they are asking. I assure you that they do understand the ramifications of asking that Stock respect the existing C-3 zoning. One Naples is not simply a District 2 issue. Its approval would send a message that for the Commissioners it is “business as usual,” and the they have little concern for the “Miamification” of Collier County. It would represent the long-held pattern of the Board of County Commissioners supporting developers over neighborhoods. That must stop! I am asking you to vote to deny Stock’s proposed amendment to the Growth Management Plan. I cannot be more direct. You have for too long and for too often voted to allow developers to run slipshod over the wishes of your taxpaying constituents. Frankly, knowing how much opposition there is to the project’s design, I am amazed that this is a hard decision for anyone of the commissioners whose job it is to protect their constituent's interests. I assure you that we do understand the ramifications of asking that Stock respect the existing C-3 zoning, and I am asking you to vote to deny his proposed amendment to the Growth Management Plan. I cannot be more direct. You have for too long and for too often voted to allow developers to run slipshod over the wishes of taxpaying constituents. It must stop! I will be there on March 1st and will be watching the decisions of our county officials and whether they vote in the best interests of their tax paying constituents. I hope you will make the best decision for the Vanderbilt beach community and deny this special request. Sincerely, Terri and Kenneth Hemmelgarn 9485 Gulf Shore Drive Sunset Bay B201 Naples, Florida --------------------- From:Susan DiGirolamo To:McDanielBill Subject:Vanderbilt neighborhood Date:Thursday, February 25, 2021 7:31:08 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: On March 1 you and your fellow Commissioners will be hearing Stock Development’s application for One Naples. I am writing you today to express my strong opposition to the development as Stock has proposed it. I know full well that this development is not in our District, and that you generally tend to vote with the Commissioner in whose District the project lies. But, in this case I ask you to act independently. Residents of Commissioner Solis’ District have overwhelmingly shown their opposition. I know that you are aware of that as I know that you have received hundreds of emails telling you so. I believe that Commissioner Solis intends to vote in support of the Stock amendment to the Growth Management Plan. His reason for doing so is flawed. He feels that the neighborhood is not capable of understanding the nuances of the matter before you, and that he, alone, know what is good for his District. When he tells people, “Be careful what you wish for.” he is saying that the residents of the affected neighborhood don’t know for what they are asking. I assure you that they do understand the ramifications of asking that Stock respect the existing C-3 zoning. One Naples is not simply a District 2 issue. It’s approval would send a message that for the Commissioners it’s “business as usual,” and the they have little concern for the “Miamification” of Collier County. It would represent the long-held pattern of the Board of County Commissioners supporting developers over neighborhoods. That must stop! I am asking you to vote to deny Stock’s proposed amendment to the Growth Management Plan. I cannot be more direct. You have for too long and for too often voted to allow developers to run slipshod over the wishes of your taxpaying constituents. I will be there on March 1st to hold your feet to the fire. ____Susan DiGirolamo ______________________ --------------------- From:Kathryn Allen To:McDanielBill Subject:Vanderbilt neighborhood Date:Thursday, February 25, 2021 11:37:36 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: On March 1 you and your fellow Commissioners will be hearing Stock Development’s application for One Naples. I am writing you today to express my strong opposition to the development as Stock has proposed it. I know full well that this development is not in our District, and that you generally tend to vote with the Commissioner in whose District the project lies. But, in this case I ask you to act independently. Residents of Commissioner Solis’ District have overwhelmingly shown their opposition. I know that you are aware of that as I know that you have received hundreds of emails telling you so. I believe that Commissioner Solis intends to vote in support of the Stock amendment to the Growth Management Plan. His reason for doing so is flawed. He feels that the neighborhood is not capable of understanding the nuances of the matter before you, and that he, alone, know what is good for his District. When he tells people, “Be careful what you wish for.” he is saying that the residents of the affected neighborhood don’t know for what they are asking. I assure you that they do understand the ramifications of asking that Stock respect the existing C-3 zoning. One Naples is not simply a District 2 issue. It’s approval would send a message that for the Commissioners it’s “business as usual,” and the they have little concern for the “Miamification” of Collier County. It would represent the long-held pattern of the Board of County Commissioners supporting developers over neighborhoods. That must stop! I am asking you to vote to deny Stock’s proposed amendment to the Growth Management Plan. I cannot be more direct. You have for too long and for too often voted to allow developers to run slipshod over the wishes of your taxpaying constituents. I will be there on March 1st to hold your feet to the fire. Kathryn Allen Owner, The Mansions Condominium Vanderbilt Beach __________________________ --------------------- From:David Legus To:McDanielBill Subject:Vanderbilt neighborhood Date:Thursday, February 25, 2021 7:52:56 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: On March 1 you and your fellow Commissioners will be hearing Stock Development’s application for One Naples. I am writing you today to express my strong opposition to the development as Stock has proposed it. I know full well that this development is not in our District, and that you generally tend to vote with the Commissioner in whose District the project lies. But, in this case I ask you to act independently. Residents of Commissioner Solis’ District have overwhelmingly shown their opposition. I know that you are aware of that as I know that you have received hundreds of emails telling you so. I believe that Commissioner Solis intends to vote in support of the Stock amendment to the Growth Management Plan. His reason for doing so is flawed. He feels that the neighborhood is not capable of understanding the nuances of the matter before you, and that he, alone, know what is good for his District. When he tells people, “Be careful what you wish for.” he is saying that the residents of the affected neighborhood don’t know for what they are asking. I assure you that they do understand the ramifications of asking that Stock respect the existing C-3 zoning. One Naples is not simply a District 2 issue. It’s approval would send a message that for the Commissioners it’s “business as usual,” and the they have little concern for the “Miamification” of Collier County. It would represent the long-held pattern of the Board of County Commissioners supporting developers over neighborhoods. That must stop! I am asking you to vote to deny Stock’s proposed amendment to the Growth Management Plan. I cannot be more direct. You have for too long and for too often voted to allow developers to run slipshod over the wishes of your taxpaying constituents. I will be there on March 1st to hold your feet to the fire. __________________________ --------------------- From:Laura Donovan To:McDanielBill Subject:Vanderbilt neighborhood Date:Thursday, February 25, 2021 6:08:57 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: On March 1 you and your fellow Commissioners will be hearing Stock Development’s application for One Naples. I am writing you today to express my strong opposition to the development as Stock has proposed it. I know full well that this development is not in our District, and that you generally tend to vote with the Commissioner in whose District the project lies. But, in this case I ask you to act independently. Residents of Commissioner Solis’ District have overwhelmingly shown their opposition. I know that you are aware of that as I know that you have received hundreds of emails telling you so. I believe that Commissioner Solis intends to vote in support of the Stock amendment to the Growth Management Plan. His reason for doing so is flawed. He feels that the neighborhood is not capable of understanding the nuances of the matter before you, and that he, alone, know what is good for his District. When he tells people, “Be careful what you wish for.” he is saying that the residents of the affected neighborhood don’t know for what they are asking. I assure you that they do understand the ramifications of asking that Stock respect the existing C-3 zoning. One Naples is not simply a District 2 issue. It’s approval would send a message that for the Commissioners it’s “business as usual,” and the they have little concern for the “Miamification” of Collier County. It would represent the long-held pattern of the Board of County Commissioners supporting developers over neighborhoods. That must stop! I am asking you to vote to deny Stock’s proposed amendment to the Growth Management Plan. I cannot be more direct. You have for too long and for too often voted to allow developers to run slipshod over the wishes of your taxpaying constituents. I will be there on March 1st to hold your feet to the fire. Laura Donovan __________________________ --------------------- From:jeanine bandiero To:McDanielBill Subject:Vanderbilt neighborhood Date:Thursday, February 25, 2021 5:26:11 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: On March 1 you and your fellow Commissioners will be hearing Stock Development’s application for One Naples. I am writing you today to express my strong opposition to the development as Stock has proposed it. I know full well that this development is not in our District, and that you generally tend to vote with the Commissioner in whose District the project lies. But, in this case I ask you to act independently. Residents of Commissioner Solis’ District have overwhelmingly shown their opposition. I know that you are aware of that as I know that you have received hundreds of emails telling you so. I believe that Commissioner Solis intends to vote in support of the Stock amendment to the Growth Management Plan. His reason for doing so is flawed. He feels that the neighborhood is not capable of understanding the nuances of the matter before you, and that he, alone, know what is good for his District. When he tells people, “Be careful what you wish for.” he is saying that the residents of the affected neighborhood don’t know for what they are asking. I assure you that they do understand the ramifications of asking that Stock respect the existing C-3 zoning. One Naples is not simply a District 2 issue. It’s approval would send a message that for the Commissioners it’s “business as usual,” and the they have little concern for the “Miamification” of Collier County. It would represent the long-held pattern of the Board of County Commissioners supporting developers over neighborhoods. That must stop! I am asking you to vote to deny Stock’s proposed amendment to the Growth Management Plan. I cannot be more direct. You have for too long and for too often voted to allow developers to run slipshod over the wishes of your taxpaying constituents. I will be there on March 1st to hold your feet to the fire. __________________________ --------------------- From:Suzanne Geoffrion To:McDanielBill Subject:Vanderbilt neighborhood Date:Thursday, February 25, 2021 5:14:22 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: On March 1 you and your fellow Commissioners will be hearing Stock Development’s application for One Naples. I am writing you today to express my strong opposition to the development as Stock has proposed it. Suzanne Geoffrion__________________________ --------------------- From:Cary Scottoline To:McDanielBill Subject:Vanderbilt neighborhood Date:Thursday, February 25, 2021 5:03:13 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: On March 1 you and your fellow Commissioners will be hearing Stock Development’s application for One Naples. I am writing you today to express my strong opposition to the development as Stock has proposed it. I know full well that this development is not in our District, and that you generally tend to vote with the Commissioner in whose District the project lies. But, in this case I ask you to act independently. Residents of Commissioner Solis’ District have overwhelmingly shown their opposition. I know that you are aware of that as I know that you have received hundreds of emails telling you so. I believe that Commissioner Solis intends to vote in support of the Stock amendment to the Growth Management Plan. His reason for doing so is flawed. He feels that the neighborhood is not capable of understanding the nuances of the matter before you, and that he, alone, know what is good for his District. When he tells people, “Be careful what you wish for.” he is saying that the residents of the affected neighborhood don’t know for what they are asking. I assure you that they do understand the ramifications of asking that Stock respect the existing C-3 zoning. One Naples is not simply a District 2 issue. It’s approval would send a message that for the Commissioners it’s “business as usual,” and the they have little concern for the “Miamification” of Collier County. It would represent the long-held pattern of the Board of County Commissioners supporting developers over neighborhoods. That must stop! I am asking you to vote to deny Stock’s proposed amendment to the Growth Management Plan. I cannot be more direct. You have for too long and for too often voted to allow developers to run slipshod over the wishes of your taxpaying constituents. I will be there on March 1st to hold your feet to the fire. __________________________ --------------------- From:francis scappatori To:McDanielBill Subject:Vanderbilt neighborhood Date:Thursday, February 25, 2021 4:12:25 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: On March 1 you and your fellow Commissioners will be hearing Stock Development’s application for One Naples. I am writing you today to express my strong opposition to the development . Kindly vote against this development F scappatori __________________________ --------------------- From:Cheryl Roe To:McDanielBill Subject:Vanderbilt neighborhood Date:Friday, February 26, 2021 6:57:21 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: On March 1 you and your fellow Commissioners will be hearing Stock Development’s application for One Naples. I am writing you today to express my strong opposition to the development as Stock has proposed it. I know full well that this development is not in our District, and that you generally tend to vote with the Commissioner in whose District the project lies. But, in this case I ask you to act independently. Residents of Commissioner Solis’ District have overwhelmingly shown their opposition. I know that you are aware of that as I know that you have received hundreds of emails telling you so. I believe that Commissioner Solis intends to vote in support of the Stock amendment to the Growth Management Plan. His reason for doing so is flawed. He feels that the neighborhood is not capable of understanding the nuances of the matter before you, and that he, alone, know what is good for his District. When he tells people, “Be careful what you wish for.” he is saying that the residents of the affected neighborhood don’t know for what they are asking. I assure you that they do understand the ramifications of asking that Stock respect the existing C-3 zoning. One Naples is not simply a District 2 issue. It’s approval would send a message that for the Commissioners it’s “business as usual,” and the they have little concern for the “Miamification” of Collier County. It would represent the long-held pattern of the Board of County Commissioners supporting developers over neighborhoods. That must stop! I am asking you to vote to deny Stock’s proposed amendment to the Growth Management Plan. I cannot be more direct. You have for too long and for too often voted to allow developers to run slipshod over the wishes of your taxpaying constituents. I will be there on March 1st to hold your feet to the fire. Cheryl Roe __________________________ --------------------- From:Barbara Rogers To:McDanielBill Subject:Vanderbilt neighborhood Date:Friday, February 26, 2021 3:48:42 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: On March 1 you and your fellow Commissioners will be hearing Stock Development’s application for One Naples. I am writing you today to express my strong opposition to the development as Stock has proposed it. I know full well that this development is not in our District, and that you generally tend to vote with the Commissioner in whose District the project lies. But, in this case I ask you to act independently. Residents of Commissioner Solis’ District have overwhelmingly shown their opposition. I know that you are aware of that as I know that you have received hundreds of emails telling you so. I believe that Commissioner Solis intends to vote in support of the Stock amendment to the Growth Management Plan. His reason for doing so is flawed. He feels that the neighborhood is not capable of understanding the nuances of the matter before you, and that he, alone, know what is good for his District. When he tells people, “Be careful what you wish for.” he is saying that the residents of the affected neighborhood don’t know for what they are asking. I assure you that they do understand the ramifications of asking that Stock respect the existing C-3 zoning. One Naples is not simply a District 2 issue. It’s approval would send a message that for the Commissioners it’s “business as usual,” and the they have little concern for the “Miamification” of Collier County. It would represent the long-held pattern of the Board of County Commissioners supporting developers over neighborhoods. That must stop! I am asking you to vote to deny Stock’s proposed amendment to the Growth Management Plan. I cannot be more direct. You have for too long and for too often voted to allow developers to run slipshod over the wishes of your taxpaying constituents. I will be there on March 1st to hold your feet to the fire. Barbara Rogers __________________________ --------------------- From:Michael Uzzi To:McDanielBill Subject:Vanderbilt neighborhood Date:Friday, February 26, 2021 1:25:29 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: On March 1 you and your fellow Commissioners will be hearing Stock Development’s application for One Naples. I am writing you today to express my strong opposition to the development as Stock has proposed it. I know full well that this development is not in our District, and that you generally tend to vote with the Commissioner in whose District the project lies. But, in this case I ask you to act independently. Residents of Commissioner Solis’ District have overwhelmingly shown their opposition. I know that you are aware of that as I know that you have received hundreds of emails telling you so. I believe that Commissioner Solis intends to vote in support of the Stock amendment to the Growth Management Plan. His reason for doing so is flawed. He feels that the neighborhood is not capable of understanding the nuances of the matter before you, and that he, alone, know what is good for his District. When he tells people, “Be careful what you wish for.” he is saying that the residents of the affected neighborhood don’t know for what they are asking. I assure you that they do understand the ramifications of asking that Stock respect the existing C-3 zoning. One Naples is not simply a District 2 issue. It’s approval would send a message that for the Commissioners it’s “business as usual,” and the they have little concern for the “Miamification” of Collier County. It would represent the long-held pattern of the Board of County Commissioners supporting developers over neighborhoods. That must stop! I am asking you to vote to deny Stock’s proposed amendment to the Growth Management Plan. I cannot be more direct. You have for too long and for too often voted to allow developers to run slipshod over the wishes of your taxpaying constituents. I will be there on March 1st to hold your feet to the fire. __________________________ --------------------- From:ANN DARWISH To:McDanielBill Subject:Vanderbilt neighborhood Date:Saturday, February 27, 2021 3:04:58 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: On March 1 you and your fellow Commissioners will be hearing Stock Development’s application for One Naples. I am writing you today to express my strong opposition to the development as Stock has proposed it. I know full well that this development is not in our District, and that you generally tend to vote with the Commissioner in whose District the project lies. But, in this case I ask you to act independently. Residents of Commissioner Solis’ District have overwhelmingly shown their opposition. I know that you are aware of that as I know that you have received hundreds of emails telling you so. I believe that Commissioner Solis intends to vote in support of the Stock amendment to the Growth Management Plan. His reason for doing so is flawed. He feels that the neighborhood is not capable of understanding the nuances of the matter before you, and that he, alone, know what is good for his District. When he tells people, “Be careful what you wish for.” he is saying that the residents of the affected neighborhood don’t know for what they are asking. I assure you that they do understand the ramifications of asking that Stock respect the existing C-3 zoning. One Naples is not simply a District 2 issue. It’s approval would send a message that for the Commissioners it’s “business as usual,” and the they have little concern for the “Miamification” of Collier County. It would represent the long-held pattern of the Board of County Commissioners supporting developers over neighborhoods. That must stop! I am asking you to vote to deny Stock’s proposed amendment to the Growth Management Plan. I cannot be more direct. You have for too long and for too often voted to allow developers to run slipshod over the wishes of your taxpaying constituents. I will be there on March 1st to hold your feet to the fire. __________________________ --------------------- From:Susan Todaro To:McDanielBill Subject:Vanderbilt neighborhood Date:Saturday, February 27, 2021 10:54:51 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: On March 1 you and your fellow Commissioners will be hearing Stock Development’s application for One Naples. I am writing you today to express my strong opposition to the development as Stock has proposed it. I know full well that this development is not in our District, and that you generally tend to vote with the Commissioner in whose District the project lies. But, in this case I ask you to act independently. Residents of Commissioner Solis’ District have overwhelmingly shown their opposition. I know that you are aware of that as I know that you have received hundreds of emails telling you so. I believe that Commissioner Solis intends to vote in support of the Stock amendment to the Growth Management Plan. His reason for doing so is flawed. He feels that the neighborhood is not capable of understanding the nuances of the matter before you, and that he, alone, know what is good for his District. When he tells people, “Be careful what you wish for.” he is saying that the residents of the affected neighborhood don’t know for what they are asking. I assure you that they do understand the ramifications of asking that Stock respect the existing C-3 zoning. One Naples is not simply a District 2 issue. It’s approval would send a message that for the Commissioners it’s “business as usual,” and the they have little concern for the “Miamification” of Collier County. It would represent the long-held pattern of the Board of County Commissioners supporting developers over neighborhoods. That must stop! I am asking you to vote to deny Stock’s proposed amendment to the Growth Management Plan. I cannot be more direct. You have for too long and for too often voted to allow developers to run slipshod over the wishes of your taxpaying constituents. I will be there on March 1st to hold your feet to the fire. __________________________ --------------------- From:Patti Rebbec To:McDanielBill Subject:Vanderbilt neighborhood Date:Saturday, February 27, 2021 10:48:59 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: On March 1 you and your fellow Commissioners will be hearing Stock Development’s application for One Naples. I am writing you today to express my strong opposition to the development as Stock has proposed it. I know full well that this development is not in our District, and that you generally tend to vote with the Commissioner in whose District the project lies. But, in this case I ask you to act independently. Residents of Commissioner Solis’ District have overwhelmingly shown their opposition. I know that you are aware of that as I know that you have received hundreds of emails telling you so. I believe that Commissioner Solis intends to vote in support of the Stock amendment to the Growth Management Plan. His reason for doing so is flawed. He feels that the neighborhood is not capable of understanding the nuances of the matter before you, and that he, alone, know what is good for his District. When he tells people, “Be careful what you wish for.” he is saying that the residents of the affected neighborhood don’t know for what they are asking. I assure you that they do understand the ramifications of asking that Stock respect the existing C-3 zoning. One Naples is not simply a District 2 issue. It’s approval would send a message that for the Commissioners it’s “business as usual,” and the they have little concern for the “Miamification” of Collier County. It would represent the long-held pattern of the Board of County Commissioners supporting developers over neighborhoods. That must stop! I am asking you to vote to deny Stock’s proposed amendment to the Growth Management Plan. I cannot be more direct. You have for too long and for too often voted to allow developers to run slipshod over the wishes of your taxpaying constituents. I will be there on March 1st to hold your feet to the fire. Patti Rebbec __________________________ --------------------- From:Michele Tamarkin To:McDanielBill Subject:Vanderbilt neighborhood Date:Saturday, February 27, 2021 7:24:22 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: On March 1 you and your fellow Commissioners will be hearing Stock Development’s application for One Naples. I am writing you today to express my strong opposition to the development as Stock has proposed it. I know full well that this development is not in our District, and that you generally tend to vote with the Commissioner in whose District the project lies. But, in this case I ask you to act independently. Residents of Commissioner Solis’ District have overwhelmingly shown their opposition. I know that you are aware of that as I know that you have received hundreds of emails telling you so. I believe that Commissioner Solis intends to vote in support of the Stock amendment to the Growth Management Plan. His reason for doing so is flawed. He feels that the neighborhood is not capable of understanding the nuances of the matter before you, and that he, alone, know what is good for his District. When he tells people, “Be careful what you wish for.” he is saying that the residents of the affected neighborhood don’t know for what they are asking. I assure you that they do understand the ramifications of asking that Stock respect the existing C-3 zoning. One Naples is not simply a District 2 issue. It’s approval would send a message that for the Commissioners it’s “business as usual,” and the they have little concern for the “Miamification” of Collier County. It would represent the long-held pattern of the Board of County Commissioners supporting developers over neighborhoods. That must stop! I am asking you to vote to deny Stock’s proposed amendment to the Growth Management Plan. I cannot be more direct. You have for too long and for too often voted to allow developers to run slipshod over the wishes of your taxpaying constituents. I will be there on March 1st to hold your feet to the fire. M. Tamarkin __________________________ --------------------- From:Bruce Burkhard To:McDanielBill Subject:Vanderbilt neighborhood Date:Saturday, February 27, 2021 12:12:42 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: “The more things change, the more they stay the same” – About ten years ago developers recognized the large profit potential along the narrow strip called Vanderbilt Beach. With their encouragement the Land Development Code was changed numerous times without any input from the public. The building heights, density and scale increased. Residents complained of a closed-in feeling, like being at the bottom of a canyon. As a result, the neighborhood associations told the county commissioners – Enough. The commissioners passed a building moratorium in January 2002. Community visioning meetings were held. The consensus – restrict future development to preserve Gulf, Lagoon and sky vistas. Reduce building heights to reduce canyon effect. County staff resisted the community’s vision and consistently leaned toward the developer’s wants. Finally, the planning commission recommended: bring building heights down to a level consistent with the community character, reduce density as required in the County’s growth management plan, increase green space, etc. In January 2004 the County Commission adopted rules limiting development in Vanderbilt Beach. It took two years, more than $50,000 and countless hours of volunteer citizen time to preserve our neighborhood. Here we are again, a new scheme, a new developer – Naples One. The resolution to this neighborhood conflict – simply comply with the Land Development Code with no variances. It’s fair and it’s legal. ______ --------------------- From:Paul Taormino To:McDanielBill Subject:Vanderbilt neighborhood Date:Sunday, February 28, 2021 3:45:23 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: On March 1 you and your fellow Commissioners will be hearing Stock Development’s application for One Naples. I am writing you today to express my strong opposition to the development as Stock has proposed it. I know full well that this development is not in our District, and that you generally tend to vote with the Commissioner in whose District the project lies. But, in this case I ask you to act independently. Residents of Commissioner Solis’ District have overwhelmingly shown their opposition. I know that you are aware of that as I know that you have received hundreds of emails telling you so. I believe that Commissioner Solis intends to vote in support of the Stock amendment to the Growth Management Plan. His reason for doing so is flawed. He feels that the neighborhood is not capable of understanding the nuances of the matter before you, and that he, alone, know what is good for his District. When he tells people, “Be careful what you wish for.” he is saying that the residents of the affected neighborhood don’t know for what they are asking. I assure you that they do understand the ramifications of asking that Stock respect the existing C-3 zoning. One Naples is not simply a District 2 issue. It’s approval would send a message that for the Commissioners it’s “business as usual,” and the they have little concern for the “Miamification” of Collier County. It would represent the long-held pattern of the Board of County Commissioners supporting developers over neighborhoods. That must stop! I am asking you to vote to deny Stock’s proposed amendment to the Growth Management Plan. I cannot be more direct. You have for too long and for too often voted to allow developers to run slipshod over the wishes of your taxpaying constituents. I will be there on March 1st to hold your feet to the fire. Paul Taormino __________________________ --------------------- From:yvonne Kangas To:McDanielBill Subject:Vanderbilt neighborhood Date:Sunday, February 28, 2021 3:43:20 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: On March 1 you and your fellow Commissioners will be hearing Stock Development’s application for One Naples. I am writing you today to express my strong opposition to the development as Stock has proposed it. I know full well that this development is not in our District, and that you generally tend to vote with the Commissioner in whose District the project lies. But, in this case I ask you to act independently. Residents of Commissioner Solis’ District have overwhelmingly shown their opposition. I know that you are aware of that as I know that you have received hundreds of emails telling you so. I believe that Commissioner Solis intends to vote in support of the Stock amendment to the Growth Management Plan. His reason for doing so is flawed. He feels that the neighborhood is not capable of understanding the nuances of the matter before you, and that he, alone, know what is good for his District. When he tells people, “Be careful what you wish for.” he is saying that the residents of the affected neighborhood don’t know for what they are asking. I assure you that they do understand the ramifications of asking that Stock respect the existing C-3 zoning. One Naples is not simply a District 2 issue. It’s approval would send a message that for the Commissioners it’s “business as usual,” and the they have little concern for the “Miamification” of Collier County. It would represent the long-held pattern of the Board of County Commissioners supporting developers over neighborhoods. That must stop! I am asking you to vote to deny Stock’s proposed amendment to the Growth Management Plan. I cannot be more direct. You have for too long and for too often voted to allow developers to run slipshod over the wishes of your taxpaying constituents. I will be there on March 1st to hold your feet to the fire. __________________________ --------------------- From:stanleykallmann To:McDanielBill Subject:Vanderbilt neighborhood Date:Sunday, February 28, 2021 3:01:58 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: On March 1 you and your fellow Commissioners will be hearing Stock Development’s application for One Naples. I am writing you today to express my strong opposition to the development as Stock has proposed it. I know full well that this development is not in our District, and that you generally tend to vote with the Commissioner in whose District the project lies. But, in this case I ask you to act independently. Residents of Commissioner Solis’ District have overwhelmingly shown their opposition. I know that you are aware of that as I know that you have received hundreds of emails telling you so. I believe that Commissioner Solis intends to vote in support of the Stock amendment to the Growth Management Plan. His reason for doing so is flawed. He feels that the neighborhood is not capable of understanding the nuances of the matter before you, and that he, alone, know what is good for his District. When he tells people, “Be careful what you wish for.” he is saying that the residents of the affected neighborhood don’t know for what they are asking. I assure you that they do understand the ramifications of asking that Stock respect the existing C-3 zoning. One Naples is not simply a District 2 issue. It’s approval would send a message that for the Commissioners it’s “business as usual,” and the they have little concern for the “Miamification” of Collier County. It would represent the long-held pattern of the Board of County Commissioners supporting developers over neighborhoods. That must stop! I am asking you to vote to deny Stock’s proposed amendment to the Growth Management Plan. I cannot be more direct. You have for too long and for too often voted to allow developers to run slipshod over the wishes of your taxpaying constituents. I will be there on March 1st to hold your feet to the fire. STOP THIS MONSTROSITY. SWKALLMANN __________________________ --------------------- From:stanley kallmann To:McDanielBill Subject:Vanderbilt neighborhood Date:Sunday, February 28, 2021 2:59:18 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: Stop this monstrosity.! On March 1 you and your fellow Commissioners will be hearing Stock Development’s application for One Naples. I am writing you today to express my strong opposition to the development as Stock has proposed it. I know full well that this development is not in our District, and that you generally tend to vote with the Commissioner in whose District the project lies. But, in this case I ask you to act independently. Residents of Commissioner Solis’ District have overwhelmingly shown their opposition. I know that you are aware of that as I know that you have received hundreds of emails telling you so. I believe that Commissioner Solis intends to vote in support of the Stock amendment to the Growth Management Plan. His reason for doing so is flawed. He feels that the neighborhood is not capable of understanding the nuances of the matter before you, and that he, alone, know what is good for his District. When he tells people, “Be careful what you wish for.” he is saying that the residents of the affected neighborhood don’t know for what they are asking. I assure you that they do understand the ramifications of asking that Stock respect the existing C-3 zoning. One Naples is not simply a District 2 issue. It’s approval would send a message that for the Commissioners it’s “business as usual,” and the they have little concern for the “Miamification” of Collier County. It would represent the long-held pattern of the Board of County Commissioners supporting developers over neighborhoods. That must stop! I am asking you to vote to deny Stock’s proposed amendment to the Growth Management Plan. I cannot be more direct. You have for too long and for too often voted to allow developers to run slipshod over the wishes of your taxpaying constituents. I will be there on March 1st to hold your feet to the fire. __________________________ --------------------- From:Steven Agnello To:McDanielBill Subject:Vanderbilt neighborhood Date:Sunday, February 28, 2021 1:02:03 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: On March 1 you and your fellow Commissioners will be hearing Stock Development’s application for One Naples. I am writing you today to express my strong opposition to the development as Stock has proposed it. I know full well that this development is not in our District, and that you generally tend to vote with the Commissioner in whose District the project lies. But, in this case I ask you to act independently. Residents of Commissioner Solis’ District have overwhelmingly shown their opposition. I know that you are aware of that as I know that you have received hundreds of emails telling you so. I believe that Commissioner Solis intends to vote in support of the Stock amendment to the Growth Management Plan. His reason for doing so is flawed. He feels that the neighborhood is not capable of understanding the nuances of the matter before you, and that he, alone, know what is good for his District. When he tells people, “Be careful what you wish for.” he is saying that the residents of the affected neighborhood don’t know for what they are asking. I assure you that they do understand the ramifications of asking that Stock respect the existing C-3 zoning. One Naples is not simply a District 2 issue. It’s approval would send a message that for the Commissioners it’s “business as usual,” and the they have little concern for the “Miamification” of Collier County. It would represent the long-held pattern of the Board of County Commissioners supporting developers over neighborhoods. That must stop! I am asking you to vote to deny Stock’s proposed amendment to the Growth Management Plan. I cannot be more direct. You have for too long and for too often voted to allow developers to run slipshod over the wishes of your taxpaying constituents. I will be there on March 1st to hold your feet to the fire. __________________________ --------------------- From:Nancy Traczyk To:McDanielBill Subject:Vanderbilt neighborhood Date:Sunday, February 28, 2021 12:41:52 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: My name is Nancy Traczyk. My husband Edward and I have lived in Naples full time since 1985. We have witnessed tremendous growth all over Naples. We live 6 miles from Vanderbilt Beach. We have enjoyed many good years at this beach with our family and friends. I recently tried to drive to Vanderbilt Beach and there was already traffic backed up at the Pavillion shopping center. It took me 20 minutes waiting in traffic to get to the public Beach parking lot. I am very concerned that the Stock Development One Naples project will cause explosive overcrowding and take away the quality of life in Naples that we have known since 1985. I am asking you to please vote to turn down the Stock Development One Naples GMP amendment when you meet with your fellow Collier County Commissioners on Monday March 1st at 9am. Thank you for consideration of my request to Save Vanderbilt Beach. Sincerely, Nancy Traczyk __________________________ --------------------- From:Anne kamilatos To:McDanielBill Subject:Vanderbilt neighborhood Date:Sunday, February 28, 2021 10:49:51 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: On March 1 you and your fellow Commissioners will be hearing Stock Development’s application for One Naples. I am writing you today to express my strong opposition to the development as Stock has proposed it. I know full well that this development is not in our District, and that you generally tend to vote with the Commissioner in whose District the project lies. But, in this case I ask you to act independently. Residents of Commissioner Solis’ District have overwhelmingly shown their opposition. I know that you are aware of that as I know that you have received hundreds of emails telling you so. I believe that Commissioner Solis intends to vote in support of the Stock amendment to the Growth Management Plan. His reason for doing so is flawed. He feels that the neighborhood is not capable of understanding the nuances of the matter before you, and that he, alone, know what is good for his District. When he tells people, “Be careful what you wish for.” he is saying that the residents of the affected neighborhood don’t know for what they are asking. I assure you that they do understand the ramifications of asking that Stock respect the existing C-3 zoning. One Naples is not simply a District 2 issue. It’s approval would send a message that for the Commissioners it’s “business as usual,” and the they have little concern for the “Miamification” of Collier County. It would represent the long-held pattern of the Board of County Commissioners supporting developers over neighborhoods. That must stop! I am asking you to vote to deny Stock’s proposed amendment to the Growth Management Plan. I cannot be more direct. You have for too long and for too often voted to allow developers to run slipshod over the wishes of your taxpaying constituents. I will be there on March 1st to hold your feet to the fire. Anne kamilatos __________________________ --------------------- From:Patricia Van almkerk To:McDanielBill Subject:Vanderbilt neighborhood Date:Sunday, February 28, 2021 7:16:23 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: On March 1 you and your fellow Commissioners will be hearing Stock Development’s application for One Naples. I am writing you today to express my strong opposition to the development as Stock has proposed it. I know full well that this development is not in our District, and that you generally tend to vote with the Commissioner in whose District the project lies. But, in this case I ask you to act independently. Residents of Commissioner Solis’ District have overwhelmingly shown their opposition. I know that you are aware of that as I know that you have received hundreds of emails telling you so. I believe that Commissioner Solis intends to vote in support of the Stock amendment to the Growth Management Plan. His reason for doing so is flawed. He feels that the neighborhood is not capable of understanding the nuances of the matter before you, and that he, alone, know what is good for his District. When he tells people, “Be careful what you wish for.” he is saying that the residents of the affected neighborhood don’t know for what they are asking. I assure you that they do understand the ramifications of asking that Stock respect the existing C-3 zoning. One Naples is not simply a District 2 issue. It’s approval would send a message that for the Commissioners it’s “business as usual,” and the they have little concern for the “Miamification” of Collier County. It would represent the long-held pattern of the Board of County Commissioners supporting developers over neighborhoods. That must stop! I am asking you to vote to deny Stock’s proposed amendment to the Growth Management Plan. I cannot be more direct. You have for too long and for too often voted to allow developers to run slipshod over the wishes of your taxpaying constituents. I will be there on March 1st to hold your feet to the fire. __________________________ --------------------- From:Patricia Van almkerk To:McDanielBill Subject:Vanderbilt neighborhood Date:Sunday, February 28, 2021 7:15:47 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: On March 1 you and your fellow Commissioners will be hearing Stock Development’s application for One Naples. I am writing you today to express my strong opposition to the development as Stock has proposed it. I know full well that this development is not in our District, and that you generally tend to vote with the Commissioner in whose District the project lies. But, in this case I ask you to act independently. Residents of Commissioner Solis’ District have overwhelmingly shown their opposition. I know that you are aware of that as I know that you have received hundreds of emails telling you so. I believe that Commissioner Solis intends to vote in support of the Stock amendment to the Growth Management Plan. His reason for doing so is flawed. He feels that the neighborhood is not capable of understanding the nuances of the matter before you, and that he, alone, know what is good for his District. When he tells people, “Be careful what you wish for.” he is saying that the residents of the affected neighborhood don’t know for what they are asking. I assure you that they do understand the ramifications of asking that Stock respect the existing C-3 zoning. One Naples is not simply a District 2 issue. It’s approval would send a message that for the Commissioners it’s “business as usual,” and the they have little concern for the “Miamification” of Collier County. It would represent the long-held pattern of the Board of County Commissioners supporting developers over neighborhoods. That must stop! I am asking you to vote to deny Stock’s proposed amendment to the Growth Management Plan. I cannot be more direct. You have for too long and for too often voted to allow developers to run slipshod over the wishes of your taxpaying constituents. I will be there on March 1st to hold your feet to the fire. __________________________ --------------------- From:Sara Vanderhill To:McDanielBill Subject:Vanderbilt neighborhood Date:Sunday, February 28, 2021 4:02:54 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: On March 1 you and your fellow Commissioners will be hearing Stock Development’s application for One Naples. I am writing you today to express my strong opposition to the development as Stock has proposed it. I know full well that this development is not in our District, and that you generally tend to vote with the Commissioner in whose District the project lies. But, in this case I ask you to act independently. Residents of Commissioner Solis’ District have overwhelmingly shown their opposition. I know that you are aware of that as I know that you have received hundreds of emails telling you so. I believe that Commissioner Solis intends to vote in support of the Stock amendment to the Growth Management Plan. His reason for doing so is flawed. He feels that the neighborhood is not capable of understanding the nuances of the matter before you, and that he, alone, know what is good for his District. When he tells people, “Be careful what you wish for.” he is saying that the residents of the affected neighborhood don’t know for what they are asking. I assure you that they do understand the ramifications of asking that Stock respect the existing C-3 zoning. One Naples is not simply a District 2 issue. It’s approval would send a message that for the Commissioners it’s “business as usual,” and the they have little concern for the “Miamification” of Collier County. It would represent the long-held pattern of the Board of County Commissioners supporting developers over neighborhoods. That must stop! I am asking you to vote to deny Stock’s proposed amendment to the Growth Management Plan. I cannot be more direct. You have for too long and for too often voted to allow developers to run slipshod over the wishes of your taxpaying constituents. I will be there on March 1st to hold your feet to the fire. _Sara Vanderhill_________________________ --------------------- From:Susan Stanley To:McDanielBill Subject:Vanderbilt neighborhood Date:Monday, March 1, 2021 11:43:39 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: On March 1 you and your fellow Commissioners will be hearing Stock Development’s application for One Naples. I am writing you today to express my strong opposition to the development as Stock has proposed it. I know full well that this development is not in our District, and that you generally tend to vote with the Commissioner in whose District the project lies. But, in this case I ask you to act independently. Residents of Commissioner Solis’ District have overwhelmingly shown their opposition. I know that you are aware of that as I know that you have received hundreds of emails telling you so. I believe that Commissioner Solis intends to vote in support of the Stock amendment to the Growth Management Plan. His reason for doing so is flawed. He feels that the neighborhood is not capable of understanding the nuances of the matter before you, and that he, alone, know what is good for his District. When he tells people, “Be careful what you wish for.” he is saying that the residents of the affected neighborhood don’t know for what they are asking. I assure you that they do understand the ramifications of asking that Stock respect the existing C-3 zoning. One Naples is not simply a District 2 issue. It’s approval would send a message that for the Commissioners it’s “business as usual,” and the they have little concern for the “Miamification” of Collier County. It would represent the long-held pattern of the Board of County Commissioners supporting developers over neighborhoods. That must stop! I am asking you to vote to deny Stock’s proposed amendment to the Growth Management Plan. I cannot be more direct. You have for too long and for too often voted to allow developers to run slipshod over the wishes of your taxpaying constituents. I will be there on March 1st to hold your feet to the fire. Susan Stanley __________________________ --------------------- From:patricia clancy To:McDanielBill Subject:Vanderbilt neighborhood Date:Monday, March 1, 2021 11:18:08 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: On March 1 you and your fellow Commissioners will be hearing Stock Development’s application for One Naples. I am writing you today to express my strong opposition to the development as Stock has proposed it. I know full well that this development is not in our District, and that you generally tend to vote with the Commissioner in whose District the project lies. But, in this case I ask you to act independently. Residents of Commissioner Solis’ District have overwhelmingly shown their opposition. I know that you are aware of that as I know that you have received hundreds of emails telling you so. I believe that Commissioner Solis intends to vote in support of the Stock amendment to the Growth Management Plan. His reason for doing so is flawed. He feels that the neighborhood is not capable of understanding the nuances of the matter before you, and that he, alone, know what is good for his District. When he tells people, “Be careful what you wish for.” he is saying that the residents of the affected neighborhood don’t know for what they are asking. I assure you that they do understand the ramifications of asking that Stock respect the existing C-3 zoning. One Naples is not simply a District 2 issue. It’s approval would send a message that for the Commissioners it’s “business as usual,” and the they have little concern for the “Miamification” of Collier County. It would represent the long-held pattern of the Board of County Commissioners supporting developers over neighborhoods. That must stop! I am asking you to vote to deny Stock’s proposed amendment to the Growth Management Plan. I cannot be more direct. You have for too long and for too often voted to allow developers to run slipshod over the wishes of your taxpaying constituents. I will be there on March 1st to hold your feet to the fire. __________________________ --------------------- From:Paulette Franklin To:McDanielBill Subject:Vanderbilt neighborhood Date:Monday, March 1, 2021 10:58:05 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: On March 1 you and your fellow Commissioners will be hearing Stock Development’s application for One Naples. I am writing you today to express my strong opposition to the development as Stock has proposed it. I know full well that this development is not in our District, and that you generally tend to vote with the Commissioner in whose District the project lies. But, in this case I ask you to act independently. Residents of Commissioner Solis’ District have overwhelmingly shown their opposition. I know that you are aware of that as I know that you have received hundreds of emails telling you so. I believe that Commissioner Solis intends to vote in support of the Stock amendment to the Growth Management Plan. His reason for doing so is flawed. He feels that the neighborhood is not capable of understanding the nuances of the matter before you, and that he, alone, know what is good for his District. When he tells people, “Be careful what you wish for.” he is saying that the residents of the affected neighborhood don’t know for what they are asking. I assure you that they do understand the ramifications of asking that Stock respect the existing C-3 zoning. One Naples is not simply a District 2 issue. It’s approval would send a message that for the Commissioners it’s “business as usual,” and the they have little concern for the “Miamification” of Collier County. It would represent the long-held pattern of the Board of County Commissioners supporting developers over neighborhoods. That must stop! I am asking you to vote to deny Stock’s proposed amendment to the Growth Management Plan. I cannot be more direct. You have for too long and for too often voted to allow developers to run slipshod over the wishes of your taxpaying constituents. I will be there on March 1st to hold your feet to the fire. Paulette Franklin __________________________ --------------------- From:Susan Dalton To:McDanielBill Subject:Vanderbilt neighborhood Date:Monday, March 1, 2021 10:52:35 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: On March 1 you and your fellow Commissioners will be hearing Stock Development’s application for One Naples. I am writing you today to express my strong opposition to the development as Stock has proposed it. I know full well that this development is not in our District, and that you generally tend to vote with the Commissioner in whose District the project lies. But, in this case I ask you to act independently. Residents of Commissioner Solis’ District have overwhelmingly shown their opposition. I know that you are aware of that as I know that you have received hundreds of emails telling you so. I believe that Commissioner Solis intends to vote in support of the Stock amendment to the Growth Management Plan. His reason for doing so is flawed. He feels that the neighborhood is not capable of understanding the nuances of the matter before you, and that he, alone, know what is good for his District. When he tells people, “Be careful what you wish for.” he is saying that the residents of the affected neighborhood don’t know for what they are asking. I assure you that they do understand the ramifications of asking that Stock respect the existing C-3 zoning. One Naples is not simply a District 2 issue. It’s approval would send a message that for the Commissioners it’s “business as usual,” and the they have little concern for the “Miamification” of Collier County. It would represent the long-held pattern of the Board of County Commissioners supporting developers over neighborhoods. That must stop! I am asking you to vote to deny Stock’s proposed amendment to the Growth Management Plan. I cannot be more direct. You have for too long and for too often voted to allow developers to run slipshod over the wishes of your taxpaying constituents. I will be there on March 1st to hold your feet to the fire. Susan Dalton __________________________ --------------------- From:Richard Yeager To:McDanielBill Subject:Vanderbilt neighborhood Date:Monday, March 1, 2021 2:42:39 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: On March 1 you and your fellow Commissioners will be hearing Stock Development’s application for One Naples. I am writing you today to express my strong opposition to the development as Stock has proposed it. I know full well that this development is not in our District, and that you generally tend to vote with the Commissioner in whose District the project lies. But, in this case I ask you to act independently. Residents of Commissioner Solis’ District have overwhelmingly shown their opposition. I know that you are aware of that as I know that you have received hundreds of emails telling you so. I believe that Commissioner Solis intends to vote in support of the Stock amendment to the Growth Management Plan. His reason for doing so is flawed. He feels that the neighborhood is not capable of understanding the nuances of the matter before you, and that he, alone, know what is good for his District. When he tells people, “Be careful what you wish for.” he is saying that the residents of the affected neighborhood don’t know for what they are asking. I assure you that they do understand the ramifications of asking that Stock respect the existing C-3 zoning. One Naples is not simply a District 2 issue. It’s approval would send a message that for the Commissioners it’s “business as usual,” and the they have little concern for the “Miamification” of Collier County. It would represent the long-held pattern of the Board of County Commissioners supporting developers over neighborhoods. That must stop! I am asking you to vote to deny Stock’s proposed amendment to the Growth Management Plan. I cannot be more direct. You have for too long and for too often voted to allow developers to run slipshod over the wishes of your taxpaying constituents. I will be there on March 1st to hold your feet to the fire. _Richard Yeager_______________________ --------------------- From:LG To:McDanielBill Subject:Vanderbilt neighborhood Date:Sunday, February 28, 2021 11:17:22 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: On March 1 you and your fellow Commissioners will be hearing Stock Development’s application for One Naples. I am writing you today to express my strong opposition to the development as Stock has proposed it. I know full well that this development is not in our District, and that you generally tend to vote with the Commissioner in whose District the project lies. But, in this case I ask you to act independently. Residents of Commissioner Solis’ District have overwhelmingly shown their opposition. I know that you are aware of that as I know that you have received hundreds of emails telling you so. I believe that Commissioner Solis intends to vote in support of the Stock amendment to the Growth Management Plan. His reason for doing so is flawed. He feels that the neighborhood is not capable of understanding the nuances of the matter before you, and that he, alone, know what is good for his District. When he tells people, “Be careful what you wish for.” he is saying that the residents of the affected neighborhood don’t know for what they are asking. I assure you that they do understand the ramifications of asking that Stock respect the existing C-3 zoning. One Naples is not simply a District 2 issue. It’s approval would send a message that for the Commissioners it’s “business as usual,” and the they have little concern for the “Miamification” of Collier County. It would represent the long-held pattern of the Board of County Commissioners supporting developers over neighborhoods. That must stop! I am asking you to vote to deny Stock’s proposed amendment to the Growth Management Plan. I cannot be more direct. You have for too long and for too often voted to allow developers to run slipshod over the wishes of your taxpaying constituents. I will be there on March 1. PLEASE vote no to the Stock development. __________________________ --------------------- From:BRIAN J MASON To:McDanielBill Subject:Vanderbilt neighborhood Date:Sunday, February 28, 2021 9:53:42 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: On March 1 you and your fellow Commissioners will be hearing Stock Development’s application for One Naples. I am writing you today to express my strong opposition to the development as Stock has proposed it. I know full well that this development is not in our District, and that you generally tend to vote with the Commissioner in whose District the project lies. But, in this case I ask you to act independently. Residents of Commissioner Solis’ District have overwhelmingly shown their opposition. I know that you are aware of that as I know that you have received hundreds of emails telling you so. I believe that Commissioner Solis intends to vote in support of the Stock amendment to the Growth Management Plan. His reason for doing so is flawed. He feels that the neighborhood is not capable of understanding the nuances of the matter before you, and that he, alone, know what is good for his District. When he tells people, “Be careful what you wish for.” he is saying that the residents of the affected neighborhood don’t know for what they are asking. I assure you that they do understand the ramifications of asking that Stock respect the existing C-3 zoning. One Naples is not simply a District 2 issue. It’s approval would send a message that for the Commissioners it’s “business as usual,” and the they have little concern for the “Miamification” of Collier County. It would represent the long-held pattern of the Board of County Commissioners supporting developers over neighborhoods. That must stop! I am asking you to vote to deny Stock’s proposed amendment to the Growth Management Plan. I cannot be more direct. You have for too long and for too often voted to allow developers to run slipshod over the wishes of your taxpaying constituents. I will be there on March 1st to hold your feet to the fire. __________________________ --------------------- From:Daniel sterchele To:McDanielBill Subject:Vanderbilt neighborhood Date:Sunday, February 28, 2021 9:15:33 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: On March 1 you and your fellow Commissioners will be hearing Stock Development’s application for One Naples. I am writing you today to express my strong opposition to the development as Stock has proposed it. I know full well that this development is not in our District, and that you generally tend to vote with the Commissioner in whose District the project lies. But, in this case I ask you to act independently. Residents of Commissioner Solis’ District have overwhelmingly shown their opposition. I know that you are aware of that as I know that you have received hundreds of emails telling you so. I believe that Commissioner Solis intends to vote in support of the Stock amendment to the Growth Management Plan. His reason for doing so is flawed. He feels that the neighborhood is not capable of understanding the nuances of the matter before you, and that he, alone, know what is good for his District. When he tells people, “Be careful what you wish for.” he is saying that the residents of the affected neighborhood don’t know for what they are asking. I assure you that they do understand the ramifications of asking that Stock respect the existing C-3 zoning. One Naples is not simply a District 2 issue. It’s approval would send a message that for the Commissioners it’s “business as usual,” and the they have little concern for the “Miamification” of Collier County. It would represent the long-held pattern of the Board of County Commissioners supporting developers over neighborhoods. That must stop! I am asking you to vote to deny Stock’s proposed amendment to the Growth Management Plan. I cannot be more direct. You have for too long and for too often voted to allow developers to run slipshod over the wishes of your taxpaying constituents. I will be there on March 1st to hold your feet to the fire. __________________________ --------------------- From:Daniel sterchele To:McDanielBill Subject:Vanderbilt neighborhood Date:Sunday, February 28, 2021 9:13:46 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: On March 1 you and your fellow Commissioners will be hearing Stock Development’s application for One Naples. I am writing you today to express my strong opposition to the development as Stock has proposed it. I know full well that this development is not in our District, and that you generally tend to vote with the Commissioner in whose District the project lies. But, in this case I ask you to act independently. Residents of Commissioner Solis’ District have overwhelmingly shown their opposition. I know that you are aware of that as I know that you have received hundreds of emails telling you so. I believe that Commissioner Solis intends to vote in support of the Stock amendment to the Growth Management Plan. His reason for doing so is flawed. He feels that the neighborhood is not capable of understanding the nuances of the matter before you, and that he, alone, know what is good for his District. When he tells people, “Be careful what you wish for.” he is saying that the residents of the affected neighborhood don’t know for what they are asking. I assure you that they do understand the ramifications of asking that Stock respect the existing C-3 zoning. One Naples is not simply a District 2 issue. It’s approval would send a message that for the Commissioners it’s “business as usual,” and the they have little concern for the “Miamification” of Collier County. It would represent the long-held pattern of the Board of County Commissioners supporting developers over neighborhoods. That must stop! I am asking you to vote to deny Stock’s proposed amendment to the Growth Management Plan. I cannot be more direct. You have for too long and for too often voted to allow developers to run slipshod over the wishes of your taxpaying constituents. I will be there on March 1st to hold your feet to the fire. __________________________ --------------------- From:Linda Dragan To:McDanielBill Subject:Vanderbilt neighborhood Date:Sunday, February 28, 2021 6:26:47 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: I have owned since 1987 in Naples Park, near the site we are speaking about. When I bought I was told growth would be limited because Naples had a handle on things and they did not want to be like the east coast. General Electric (if I recall correctly) owned adjacent to the Ritz and there would be no buildings built on the beach. I was informed of a lot of decisions of where I was buying. Through the years, greed took over and changes made to areas that were protected. Animals are knocking on doors and swimming in pools where they once had their own homes. Many years back I saw an eagle fly by me on a golf course. What was said to me on that day was 'enjoy the experience' as developers were taking the lands away. Simply, the developers would rather pay an outrageous fine versus stop what they were doing to avoid the fine. In essence, money speaks and the authenticity of what Naples was is sadly the past. Stock's building in a tight area just takes away any quaintness the area could have for the neighborhood. I 'read' that Stock bought the Du Ra Ma land so, if true, they will succeed in getting what they want. It would be refreshing if I saw the property owners being listened to but, our times are not about the people's concerns. We may be the taxpayers but, our voices are small compared to the mighty dollar that can override the people that live in the area. We are nobody. The wildlife, whether land or water, can not compete with the mighty dollar either. Sincerely, Linda Dragan --------------------- From:Ellessandra F Taormino To:McDanielBill Subject:Vanderbilt neighborhood Date:Sunday, February 28, 2021 5:43:45 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: On March 1 you and your fellow Commissioners will be hearing Stock Development’s application for One Naples. I am writing you today to express my strong opposition to the development as Stock has proposed it. I know full well that this development is not in our District, and that you generally tend to vote with the Commissioner in whose District the project lies. But, in this case I ask you to act independently. Residents of Commissioner Solis’ District have overwhelmingly shown their opposition. I know that you are aware of that as I know that you have received hundreds of emails telling you so. I believe that Commissioner Solis intends to vote in support of the Stock amendment to the Growth Management Plan. His reason for doing so is flawed. He feels that the neighborhood is not capable of understanding the nuances of the matter before you, and that he, alone, know what is good for his District. When he tells people, “Be careful what you wish for.” he is saying that the residents of the affected neighborhood don’t know for what they are asking. I assure you that they do understand the ramifications of asking that Stock respect the existing C-3 zoning. One Naples is not simply a District 2 issue. It’s approval would send a message that for the Commissioners it’s “business as usual,” and the they have little concern for the “Miamification” of Collier County. It would represent the long-held pattern of the Board of County Commissioners supporting developers over neighborhoods. That must stop! I am asking you to vote to deny Stock’s proposed amendment to the Growth Management Plan. I cannot be more direct. You have for too long and for too often voted to allow developers to run slipshod over the wishes of your taxpaying constituents. I will be there on March 1st to hold your feet to the fire. Ellessandra Taormino __________________________ --------------------- From:Mary Lou Campbell To:McDanielBill Subject:Vanderbilt neighborhood Date:Sunday, February 28, 2021 5:14:37 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: On March 1 you and your fellow Commissioners will be hearing Stock Development’s application for One Naples. I am writing you today to express my strong opposition to the development as Stock has proposed it. I know full well that this development is not in our District, and that you generally tend to vote with the Commissioner in whose District the project lies. But, in this case I ask you to act independently. Residents of Commissioner Solis’ District have overwhelmingly shown their opposition. I know that you are aware of that as I know that you have received hundreds of emails telling you so. I believe that Commissioner Solis intends to vote in support of the Stock amendment to the Growth Management Plan. His reason for doing so is flawed. He feels that the neighborhood is not capable of understanding the nuances of the matter before you, and that he, alone, know what is good for his District. When he tells people, “Be careful what you wish for.” he is saying that the residents of the affected neighborhood don’t know for what they are asking. I assure you that they do understand the ramifications of asking that Stock respect the existing C-3 zoning. One Naples is not simply a District 2 issue. It’s approval would send a message that for the Commissioners it’s “business as usual,” and the they have little concern for the “Miamification” of Collier County. It would represent the long-held pattern of the Board of County Commissioners supporting developers over neighborhoods. That must stop! I am asking you to vote to deny Stock’s proposed amendment to the Growth Management Plan. I cannot be more direct. You have for too long and for too often voted to allow developers to run slipshod over the wishes of your taxpaying constituents. I will be there on March 1st to hold your feet to the fire. Mary Lou Campbell Naples Park __________________________ --------------------- From:John & Nancy Hogan To:McDanielBill Subject:Vanderbilt neighborhood Date:Friday, January 1, 2021 8:31:14 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: I am writing today in my continued opposition to the One Naples project as proposed. I understand that, at a recent special meeting of the Commissioners, a decision was made to hold the March 1st hearing at the Commissioners’ chamber in the County office building. Because of the COVID-19 virus, and the social distancing it requires, this venue is not conducive to the very large turnout by all those who have an opinion about One Naples, pro or con. I hope that you and your fellow Commissioners will reconsider. Better locations might include St John the Evangelist Church, North Collier County Regional Park, a Collier County School auditorium, or even the Phil at Artis. Thank you for your consideration. Residents: John & Nancy Hogan 10951 Gulf Shore Dr #202 Naples, Fl. 34108__________________________ --------------------- From:Richard Dubois To:McDanielBill Subject:Vanderbilt neighbourhood Le Dauphin Condominium Date:Tuesday, February 16, 2021 7:31:21 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: On March 1 you and your fellow Commissioners will be hearing Stock Development’s application for One Naples. I am writing you today to express my strong opposition to the development as Stock has proposed it. I know full well that this development is not in our District, and that you generally tend to vote with the Commissioner in whose District the project lies. But, in this case I ask you to act independently. Residents of Commissioner Solis’ District have overwhelmingly shown their opposition. I know that you are aware of that as I know that you have received hundreds of emails telling you so. I believe that Commissioner Solis intends to vote in support of the Stock amendment to the Growth Management Plan. His reason for doing so is flawed. He feels that the neighborhood is not capable of understanding the nuances of the matter before you, and that he, alone, know what is good for his District. When he tells people, “Be careful what you wish for.” he is saying that the residents of the affected neighborhood don’t know for what they are asking. I assure you that they do understand the ramifications of asking that Stock respect the existing C-3 zoning. One Naples is not simply a District 2 issue. It’s approval would send a message that for the Commissioners it’s “business as usual,” and the they have little concern for the “Miamification” of Collier County. It would represent the long-held pattern of the Board of County Commissioners supporting developers over neighborhoods. That must stop! I am asking you to vote to deny Stock’s proposed amendment to the Growth Management Plan. I cannot be more direct. You have for too long and for too often voted to allow developers to run slipshod over the wishes of your taxpaying constituents. I will be there on March 1st to hold your feet to the fire. Commissioner , Mc Daniel I have been an owner in Naples (Vanderbilt Beach) for at least 40 years and have enjoyed all of what Naples implemented in their rules and building codes and was enforced for many years plus their growth management plan. I do personally know about all because 23 years ago I built a project on Vanderbilt Beach under Le Dauphin located at 9811 and 9790 Gulf Shore dr and I had to respect all rules and building codes. (Wish I could have built 18 to 20 stories) One Naples is asking all of you to change all those rules and more plus to disregard the recommendations of your Group Management Plan officials. One Naples is even offering financial incentives to condominium associations to side with them their project. Are they that desperate to destroy our community and are ready to break and over rule the existing Codes. PLEASE respect all of the GMP recommendations.This is what we all ask for. You all live in Naples and there is a reason why you chose Naples. I would think they new the rules and codes when they purchased the individual lands for their project. Thank you again for your work Richard Dubois __________________________ --------------------- From:Ken Cowan To:McDanielBill Subject:Vanderbilt neighbourhood Date:Sunday, February 14, 2021 9:13:12 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: On March 1 you and your fellow Commissioners will be hearing Stock Development’s application for One Naples. I am writing you today to express my strong opposition to the development as Stock has proposed it. I know full well that this development is not in our District, and that you generally tend to vote with the Commissioner in whose District the project lies. But, in this case I ask you to act independently. Residents of Commissioner Solis’ District have overwhelmingly shown their opposition. I know that you are aware of that as I know that you have received hundreds of emails telling you so. I believe that Commissioner Solis intends to vote in support of the Stock amendment to the Growth Management Plan. His reason for doing so is flawed. He feels that the neighborhood is not capable of understanding the nuances of the matter before you, and that he, alone, know what is good for his District. When he tells people, “Be careful what you wish for.” he is saying that the residents of the affected neighborhood don’t know for what they are asking. I assure you that they do understand the ramifications of asking that Stock respect the existing C-3 zoning. One Naples is not simply a District 2 issue. It’s approval would send a message that for the Commissioners it’s “business as usual,” and the they have little concern for the “Miamification” of Collier County. It would represent the long-held pattern of the Board of County Commissioners supporting developers over neighborhoods. That must stop! I am asking you to vote to deny Stock’s proposed amendment to the Growth Management Plan. I cannot be more direct. You have for too long and for too often voted to allow developers to run slipshod over the wishes of your taxpaying constituents. I will be there on March 1st to hold your feet to the fire. __________________________ --------------------- From:T Campbell To:SaundersBurt; SolisAndy; TaylorPenny; McDanielBill; Rick LoCastro; info@savevanderbiltbeach.com Subject:Vanderbilt proper modifications for the area. Date:Sunday, February 28, 2021 8:32:29 AM Attachments:vanderbilt modified.pdf EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Don't be bullies - listen to the residents. https://savevanderbiltbeach.com/letter-from-vanderbilt-beach-residents-association-inc/? fbclid=IwAR2O-F-6g2EEPlM4O9u5vgcfyhQneBIKTy9saw32dHIwljNLm5fLkxNLKfQ From:John Koepke To:McDanielBill Subject:Variance Date:Saturday, February 27, 2021 5:27:06 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. > > Dear Mr McDaniel > What is the meaning and purpose of a Variance? Is it to address issues with common sense for minor Is it to allow major departures from the codes? > If these variances are approved then there is no limit for the next developer. The County will have set a terrible precedent. One that will haunt Naples and its citizens for decades. > Consider a 98% increase in the maximum residential units. Can anyone believe that is a minor variance? The amount of ‘open space’ defies description and definition. This reflects the developer’s determination to deceive the County. > Citizens don’t have the connections and money to object. There will be a time of consequence. Vote NO. > Regards. John Koepke. From:c hopkins To:SolisAndy; TaylorPenny; LoCastroRick; McDanielBill; SaundersBurt Subject:Vote NO to One Naples Date:Sunday, February 28, 2021 3:58:25 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioners, As a Collier County Resident, I am urging you vote NO to Stock Development's proposed One Naples. Even with the addition of the Daruma parcel! This project far exceeds any intelligent person's vision for the future of Vanderbilt Beach and the county coastline. We have a county Growth Management Plan in place for a reason... to protect our natural resources and the safety and quality of life in Collier County, especially in already congested areas!! Please vote NO on this project. Listen to your constituents... not big development. Thank you, Cynthia Hopkins From:William Schult To:SolisAndy; TaylorPenny; LoCastroRick; McDanielBill; SaundersBurt Subject:Vote NO for current One Naples plan Date:Wednesday, February 24, 2021 3:59:03 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. To the Honorable Commissioners: Thank you for the job you do in support of our great community. I am a longtime Florida resident of the Beachwalk community (since January 2005) located along Vanderbilt Beach Road. We are just west of the Pavilion shopping plaza and across VB Rd from the north end of Pelican Bay. I am 'okay' with residential development in the area that Stock is talking about....BUT LET US BE REASONABLE...the density and height must fit the area. Stock's examples of "comparable" high rises is a crock of shit; Stock references the Ritz Carlton and Trieste. Do you see the setbacks and surrounding green space around those two high rises? There is lots of it...there is NONE of that with Stock's plan. Stock should maybe get approval for a townhouse setting type development, 3 to 5 stories tall...AND NOT ON TOP OF 2 STORIES OF PARKING. I'm talking a total height of 5 stories. If they can't make that work, then forget granting them any variances. The area is zoned commercial; residents of the area would be good with a few more restaurants and services. Stock threatens that commercial development is going to generate more auto traffic...BALONEY. Those new commercial establishments will be supported by the existing beach visitors and the residents of the area; most of whom will walk or bike to the restaurant. PLEASE do not approve this One Naples proposal as it exists today. If Stock can't make either of the two suggestions above work, then so be it. Let them move on. thank you, willie Willie Schult 790 Reef Point Circle Naples, FL 34108 e-mail: schultw@aol.com cell ph: 239-438-2801 From:peter heath To:SolisAndy; TaylorPenny; LoCastroRick; McDanielBill; SaundersBurt Subject:Vote NO for One Naples Date:Wednesday, February 24, 2021 1:36:39 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Collier County Commissioners: As you consider Mr. Stock's proposal, please be guided by your obligation to the residents of all of Collier County. A tasteful, modest development, of appropriate scale, consistent and compatible with the current neighborhood and its zoning requirements, can be a responsible enhancement to the area. But, as proposed, the Stock development is not responsible. It is too expansive, too tall, forces upon us too big of a marina, and mocks appropriate established setbacks and green space requirements. Most importantly, please bear in mind before you vote, that it is against current zoning regulations, and flouts the Collier County Land Development Code, which was established to protect our county from exactly this type of overdevelopment! Vanderbilt Beach is a popular county beach and should remain accessible to all county residents. Vanderbilt Beach Road and Gulf Shore Boulevard are single lanes, and are already heavily congested with cars, bicycles, and pedestrians. The additional burden this proposal imposes will overwhelm the current infrastructure. To Mr. Stock, this is only a money making scheme that he is vigorously trying to foist upon your constituents. As county commissioners, please consider all of your county residents. That is your charge. This includes not only the neighbors to One Naples, but all residents of the entire county. This vote will set a precedent for how all of Collier County will be allowed to grow in the future. Will Collier County grow according to the established Land Development Code, or will Mr. Stock, and other developers who will then follow his lead, be allowed to look upon the code with derision, and then talk the board into changing it to fit their personal wants? If so, why was a Land Development Code ever established? It will have totally lost its intended purpose. Please stand for the voices of all the people. Vote NO to this condescending proposal. This is our county, this is our beach access. Please represent all of us. Thank you. Sincerely, Kim and Peter Heath 8375 Excalibur Circle, Unit I-7 Naples, Florida 34108 From:Daniel Hutchins To:SolisAndy; LoCastroRick; SaundersBurt; TaylorPenny; McDanielBill Cc:SolisAndy; Philip Diberardino; David Hughes; Jim Johnson; Dave Lisbon; Dana Burich; Sandy Smith; Diana Walsh Subject:Vote NO on Naples One development Date:Friday, February 26, 2021 7:35:02 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear County Commissioners, On behalf of the Board of Directors of St Marissa Condominium Association, which is located within Pelican Bay, I want to voice our opposition to the One Naples project as currently conceived. Our opposition is based on the following --[if !supportLists]-->• These buildings do not conform to the proportions of the neighborhood. That neighborhood for which to compare this project is not Pelican Bay where the larger buildings are significantly set back and surrounded by protected lands and natural beauty. Instead, the neighborhood is Vanderbilt Beach where the buildings are closer to each other and therefore proportionately smaller. This project is not consistent with the Vanderbilt Beach neighborhood. --[if !supportLists]-->• Traffic on Vanderbilt Beach Road is already congested and this project will make it much worse. There will be more drivers cutting through Pelican Bay Boulevard, where speeding is a significant problem and the the development will make the roadway more dangerous for pedestrians and bikers. --[if !supportLists]-->• Naples beach and surrounding infrastructure will be further overcrowded and taxed. --[if !supportLists]-->• The negative environmental impact on the bay will be significant. --[if !supportLists]-->• The development is not consistent with a prudent growth management plan Please vote NO for the One Naples development which will preserve the long-term viability of the surrounding neighborhoods. Very truly yours, Daniel Hutchins St Marissa Board President From:Philip Diberardino To:SolisAndy; LoCastroRick; SaundersBurt; TaylorPenny; McDanielBill Subject:Vote NO on Naples One development Date:Friday, February 26, 2021 7:47:41 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. I want to voice my opposition to the One Naples project as currently conceived. My opposition is based on the following • These buildings do not conform to the proportions of the neighborhood. That neighborhood for which to compare this project is not Pelican Bay where the larger buildings are significantly set back and surrounded by protected lands and natural beauty. Instead, the neighborhood is Vanderbilt Beach where the buildings are closer to each other and therefore proportionately smaller. This project is not consistent with the Vanderbilt Beach neighborhood. • Traffic on Vanderbilt Beach Road is already congested and this project will make it much worse. There will be more drivers cutting through Pelican Bay Boulevard, where speeding is a significant problem and the the development will make the roadway more dangerous for pedestrians and bikers. • Naples beach and surrounding infrastructure will be further overcrowded and taxed. • The negative environmental impact on the bay will be significant. • The development is not consistent with a prudent growth management plan Please vote NO for the One Naples development which will preserve the long-term viability of the surrounding neighborhoods. Philip DiBerardino 6573 Marissa Loop Naples Fl 34108 From:Ron Diorio To:SolisAndy; TaylorPenny; LoCastroRick; McDanielBill; SaundersBurt Subject:Vote NO on Naples One project! Date:Tuesday, February 9, 2021 5:36:24 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. This project will do irreparable harm to our community. I am a resident of many years. I enjoy your engagement with our community and especially the helpful communications of Andy Solis and Penny Taylor. I know that you have our best interests at heart. This project does anything but meet our best interests. Please don't destroy the tone and fabric of our community by approving the Naples One development. Ron Diorio 6510 Valen Way- 404 Naples, 34108 From:Nanci Little Gosnell To:McDanielBill Subject:Vote NO on One Naples Date:Sunday, February 28, 2021 5:38:07 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Hi Mr McDaniel: I am contacting you to urge you to vote against this project. Please listen to the people who will be so affected by this monstrosity. Regards, Nanci Gosnell Sent from my iPhone Sent from my iPhone From:Cathy Silver To:McDanielBill Subject:Vote NO on One Naples Date:Thursday, January 7, 2021 1:33:43 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel, Please vote no for the One Naples project! It will destroy the ambience of the Vanderbilt Beach area . The size and shape of the building is not in keeping with the rest of the area. The increased numbers of people and increased traffic will make an already crowded situation worse. Stock Development will try every ploy to get neighbors to agree to drop opposition to the project. Stock's vision of that area is not the vision shared by area residents. The company is only interested in selling condos and making money. I hope you and the other commissioners will see that this is not a good direction for Collier County and especially the charming Vanderbilt Beach area to take. Stock Development should move their project elsewhere. Please vote no for the One Naples project! Sincerely Cathy Silver From:kafra1@aol.com To:McDanielBill Subject:Vote NO on One Naples Date:Saturday, January 9, 2021 12:43:08 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Please don't ruin another part of Naples and vote no. Think of the little guys for a change!! Katy Serr From:Katherine Tardio To:McDanielBill Subject:Vote NO on One Naples Date:Thursday, January 14, 2021 12:29:36 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Please Vote “NO”! Since when is offering local residents huge sums of money to influence their vote - legal, That’s blackmail! You have to change the zoning to allow One Naples to proceed anyway. Please Vote “NO”. Katie Tardio - Bay Colony Resident From:KRISTIN HARVEY To:McDanielBill Subject:Vote NO on One Naples Date:Thursday, January 7, 2021 11:02:18 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Bill, Please stop the Naples One Project! You cannot get down Vanderbilt Beach Road off 41 without a 15 minuet drive right now and with 300,000 more residents it will be impossible. Please remember that Pelican Bay will put up Gates to prevent people from traveling through PB who are not residents of PB, then what will happen to the overrun of traffic? Please think about us who are born and raised in Naples and have watched out town turn into a Miami. So very Sad! Don’t let Stock development ruin the last of North Naples. Thank you, Respectfully, Kristin Harvey From:Lester Frank To:McDanielBill Subject:Vote NO on One Naples Date:Thursday, January 7, 2021 2:42:18 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Please vote no for the latest proposed design. With the proposed population density you'll have to widen Vanderbilt Rd. and Vanderbilt Beach Rd. to six lanes to accommodate the traffic. as far as aesthetics, it is a monstrosity. I am a 22 year voting resident of Barrington Club in Pelican Bay. Thank you for your service. Lester Frank From:Pelican Bay To:McDanielBill Subject:Vote NO on One Naples Date:Wednesday, January 6, 2021 4:40:40 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Nancy Lewis for the Pelican Bay Property Owners Association Nancy Lewis, Operations Manager Pelican Bay Property Owners Association 1110 Pine Ridge Rd. Ste 303 Naples, FL 34108 Email: pbpoa@pbpropertyowners.org Phone:(239) 566-9707 Website: http://pbpoa.org/ From:sharin kusek To:McDanielBill Subject:Vote NO on One Naples Date:Wednesday, January 6, 2021 7:00:39 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Hello, Please consider the neighbors of the one Naples proposed development. We care about our neighborhood. We do not want massive buildings built that would bring in people that do not care about anything but why they can buy. This is not the right location for this project. It is the town beach. For all of Collier county. Where are the people from other parts of the county going to go? Delnor Wiggins has limited space. Families from immokolee spending a day at the beach will be replaced by people from chicago and nyc. The expected million plus dollar price tag of the condos does not represent the people of the general neighborhood surrounding Vanderbilt beach. Naples park. Regatta, Beach walk, Bear foot pelican. Check the town records to see what the neighborhood real estate sells for. Do not include waterfront. You’ll see how out of character with the neighborhood this proposal is. This will definitely bring down the value of regatta and bear foot pelican property. This project is offensive to many of us. We know it will bring in taxes. But that should not be at our expense. Thank you Sharin and Paul Kusek 400 flagship drive Naples. Florida From:Pete Eckland To:McDanielBill Subject:Vote "NO" on One Naples Date:Tuesday, February 23, 2021 2:33:52 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Good morning Commissioner, As you consider your vote, please also consider your purpose: The board “has the responsibility of setting policies that protect the health, safety, welfare and quality of life of our residents and visitors.” Thank you. Peter Eckland 6360 Pelican Bay Blvd. 205C Naples, FL 34108 Disclaimer The information contained in this communication from the sender is confidential. It is intended solely for use by the recipient and others authorized to receive it. If you are not the recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or taking action in relation of the contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. This email has been scanned for viruses and malware, and may have been automatically archived by Mimecast Ltd, an innovator in Software as a Service (SaaS) for business. Providing a safer and more useful place for your human generated data. Specializing in; Security, archiving and compliance. To find out more Click Here. From:annie dezio To:McDanielBill Subject:Vote NO to One Naples Date:Sunday, February 21, 2021 11:14:52 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear Commissioner McDaniel: Please vote NO to One Naples, even as amended. The scale of the project is just wrong for the neighborhood. One can barely find space at Vanderbilt Beach now. Brian Stock wrote today in The Naple Daily News, One Naples will "enrich the neighborhood". Sorry to say the only enrichment will be to Stock Development. Respectfully, The Dezio-Marti family (34108) From:MARCIA MARTELL To:McDanielBill Subject:Vote NO to One Naples Date:Monday, February 22, 2021 8:25:45 AM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Dear commissioner, It makes me sick when I think of the congestion One Naples will cause our community! I live in the Regatta and it is hard enough to pull out of our driveway, this project would make it impossible! The public beach is the most crowded of the three as it is, this would make it unbearable! As if Naples doesn’t have enough traffic as it is, this would make it intolerable! This development would ruin the area and community I live in and you must be able to see that! Please vote NO to reasoning for One Naples.....please! Marcia Martell Sent from my iPad Sent from my iPad From:John Houldsworth To:McDanielBill Subject:Watch Collier TV Online | Collier County, FL Date:Monday, March 1, 2021 7:24:34 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. A mercato type development would be perfect.. low rise mixed use. Thanks https://www.colliercountyfl.gov/your-government/divisions-a-e/communication-customer-relations-division/watch- collier-tv-online Sent from my iPhone From:Maureen Straight To:McDanielBill Subject:We need your support Date:Thursday, February 25, 2021 5:04:59 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Commissioner McDaniel, I wanted to express my appreciation in advance for your time and attention to my concerns regarding the Naples One development as proposed by Stock Development. As a commissioner of Collier County your ability to impact my quality of life is significant. You also have a duty to protect it. As a Board Member of Naples Park Area Association and 20-year resident of Naples park, I have lobbied against this project from its inception 4 years ago. It violates all the tenets of the zoning laws that are meant to protect the quality of life and culture of our community. There is no benefit to the community from this project. I realize Stock has a right to develop the parcel they have assembled. I am supportive of a development that complies to all current (2019-2020) county and local growth management policies, zoning, and regulations (i.e., no variances). Allowing Developers to write their own land amendments gives them free range to dismantle all the safeguards the State and County has put into place I am asking you to enforce the current land management regulations. Vote NO and DENY both applications from Stock on this One Naples project. Thank you Maureen Straight 562 100th Ave N, Naples, FL 34108 District 2 From:Ruth Lennon To:McDanielBill Subject:We oppose the One Naples Application Date:Sunday, February 28, 2021 2:12:21 PM EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. WE OPPOSE THE ONE NAPLES APPLICATION Vince & Ruth Lennon 13915 Old Coast Road Naples, FL 34110 District t District 2 RECEIVED District 3 21 February 25, 2021 Districts FEB OL 20C OFFICES OF COLLIER COUNTY Dear Mr. McDaniel Jr. BOARD OF COUNTYCOMMISSIONERE We the Board of Village Walk of Naples, representing 850 homeowners, would urge you not to agree to the request from Stock Development for variances at the March meeting. Please do not accept the Stock request for One Naples to exceed the allowable height, to diminish the allowable setbacks and to build something that is incompatible and inconsistent with the area. The number of proposed unit/occupants would have a negative effect on all the neighbors wishing to use the beach and enjoy the Vanderbilt Beach area. A building with 172 units, assuming 2 people per unit would in all likelihood result in 344 cars. We have yet to see anything re: parking allocation for homeowners, much less guests to accommodate these numbers. We agree with the idea of a residential use for the property, which is preferable to the commercial use for which it is now zoned. A smaller building, with proper setbacks and sufficient parking should be the only thing considered.A compromise acceptable to the County and the neighbors could and should be reached. We strongly urge you not to accept the One Naples project as it is currently proposed. Neil Blitz, President Susan Hoffman, Director Laurel Jura,Vice-President Mary Goddard, Director Diane Kelly, Director Tom Pitser, Treasurer Robert Roach,Director Jim Warren, Director Kathleen Adams, Secretary Daniel D. Peck J.D., Member FL Bar Meredith Peck Ralston J.D.. Member FL Bar Peck & Peck, P.A. Attorne-)s at Law 5200 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 101 Naples, Flor.da 34103 E-mail: meredith@peckandpecklaw.com February 24, 2021 VIA COURIER District 1 Collier County Board of County Commissioners District District 3 3 3299 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 303 District 4 Naples, Florida 34112 District 5� Re: One Naples PL20190000696 PL20190000697 Dear Commissioners: Telephone: (239)263-9811 Facsimile: (239)263-9818 RECEIVED j FEB 2 4 ,2021 OFFICES OF COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 44-ND D6LiV:Eey This firm represents Vanderbilt Palms Condominium Owners Association, Inc. (the "Association"). On behalf of the Association, I enclose a letter of support for Stock Development's proposed One Naples project, which is being considered at the Board of County Commissioners Hearing scheduled for March 1, 2021. The Association requests your vote of approval for this project and that you consider its enclosed letter when voting. Sincerely, Meredith Peck Ralston ..._. Enclosure cc: Board of Directors, Vanderbilt Palms Condominium Owners Association, Inc. VANDERBILT PALMS CONDOMINIUM OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC. 260 Southbay Drive Naples, Florida 34108 February 24, 2021 VIA COURIER Collier County Board of County Commissioners Commissioner William McDaniel Commissioner Penny Taylor Commissioner Burt Saunders Commissioner Andy Solis Commissioner Rick LoCastro 3299 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 303 Naples, Florida 34112 RE: One Naples PL20190000696 PL20190000697 Dear Commissioners, Please accept this letter of support from the Vanderbilt Palms Condominium Owners Association, Inc. for Stock Development's proposed One Naples project scheduled for consideration at the March 1, 2021 Board of County Commissioners Hearing. One Naples provides an opportunity for much needed improvements to our area, including the beautification of our entry road, Southbay Drive; Vanderbilt Beach Road traffic flow enhancements; a substantial reduction in the number of vehicle trips on our roadways from what the current C-3 zoning allows; and advanced drainage infrastructure to address long-standing drainage problems in our area. Blight has historically been our backyard, and the alternative we are facing under the existing commercial zoning is an intensive beach -end entertainment and retail center that will result in nuisances, more traffic, and more bodies on the beach. One Naples will bring beautiful architecture, public art, public spaces, and landscaping we can be proud of. We commend Stock Development for listening to cur concerns as well as the local communities' concerns which resulted in Stock Development reducing the project density from 300 units to 172 units. We also commend Stock Development for agreeing to reduce the number of floors in the towers by 7 stories, and designing the buildings in away that promises circulation of air and light and protects view corridors. These commitments came out of several community workshops and neighborhood outreach meetings, including 6 separate meeting with the Vanderbilt Palms Condominium Owners Association, Inc. As our neighbor, we have been delighted by Mr. Stock's ongoing outreach and commitment to a truly first class redevelopment of our comer. Approving One Naples will be a great decision for our neighborhood. We respectfully request your vote of approval for this one -of -a -kind project. Sincerely, Daniel R. Clark, President ofthe Vanderbilt Palms Condominium Owners Association.. Inc. 1 FilsonSue Subject:Zoom Meeting: Commissioner McDaniel re: One Naples Location:Zoom Link Info Below Start:Thu 2/25/2021 3:00 PM End:Thu 2/25/2021 4:00 PM Recurrence:(none) Meeting Status:Accepted Organizer:Richard Yovanovich EXTERNAL EMAIL: This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links. Coleman, Yovanovich & Koester is inviting you to a scheduled Zoom meeting. Topic: RDY - One Naples Time: Feb 25, 2021 03:00 PM Eastern Time (US and Canada) Join Zoom Meeting https://zoom.us/j/92272565713?pwd=cnprYWRmNVlkU2M0LzlDQkhSVEsyUT09 Meeting ID: 922 7256 5713 Passcode: 107866 2 FilsonSue Subject:Special BCC Meeting re CM Recruitment and One Naples Location Location:BCC Chambers Start:Tue 12/15/2020 11:00 AM End:Tue 12/15/2020 12:00 PM Recurrence:(none) Organizer:McDanielBill 9:00 – BCC/Mental Health Workshop 11:00 – BCC/Special Meeting to consider selecting an Executive Recruitment Firm as well as determining a date and location for the One Naples item 3 FilsonSue Subject:Sarah Spector & other re One Naples Location:https://us02web.zoom.us/j/83532712818?pwd=OTdNcmlZaGlvTkpnekJlYlJNWDVhZz09 Start:Thu 2/25/2021 1:00 PM End:Thu 2/25/2021 2:00 PM Recurrence:(none) Meeting Status:Accepted Organizer:FilsonSue Required Attendees:Sspector@ralaw.com; greg@stuarturbandesign.com; ckasper@hullinc.com; jcleveland@e-wasteonline.com; mcdanielbill1@gmail.com Optional Attendees:McDanielBill zmMeetingNum:83532712818 Sue Filson is inviting you to a scheduled Zoom meeting. Join Zoom Meeting https://us02web.zoom.us/j/83532712818?pwd=OTdNcmlZaGlvTkpnekJlYlJNWDVhZz09 Meeting ID: 835 3271 2818 Passcode: 572801 One tap mobile +13017158592,,83532712818#,,,,,,0#,,572801# US (Washington D.C) +13126266799,,83532712818#,,,,,,0#,,572801# US (Chicago) Dial by your location +1 301 715 8592 US (Washington D.C) +1 312 626 6799 US (Chicago) +1 646 876 9923 US (New York) +1 408 638 0968 US (San Jose) +1 669 900 6833 US (San Jose) +1 253 215 8782 US (Tacoma) +1 346 248 7799 US (Houston) 877 853 5257 US Toll-free 888 475 4499 US Toll-free 833 548 0276 US Toll-free 833 548 0282 US Toll-free Meeting ID: 835 3271 2818 Passcode: 572801 Find your local number: https://us02web.zoom.us/u/kbCjS36Rn6 Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. 4 FilsonSue Subject:Rich Yovanovich, Keith Gelder & Brian Stock re One Naples Location:Conference Call: 239-280-5280 Code: 0116456# Start:Wed 4/22/2020 10:00 AM End:Wed 4/22/2020 10:30 AM Recurrence:(none) Organizer:McDanielBill Rich, along with Keith Gelder and Brian Stock would like to speak with Nick and Leo regarding an update on One Naples. Availability:  Wednesday (4/22) 10:00 – 12:00; 2:30, 3:30  Thursday (4/23) 11:30, 3:30  Friday (4/25) 3:00 – 5:00  Monday (4/27) 10:30 – 3:00  Tuesday (4/28) 1:00 – 4:00  Wednesday (4/29) 1:00 – 5:00  Thursday (4/30) 9:00 – 12:00; 2:00 – 4:00  Friday (5/1) 1:00 Thank you. Dianna Quintanilla Legal Assistant The Northern Trust Building 4001 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 300 Naples, Florida 34103 P : 239.435.3535| F : 239.435.1218 dquintanilla@cyklawfirm.com 5 FilsonSue Subject:Pelican Bay Property Owners Assoc re One Naples/Mark English, Hank Rossi, & Nancy Lewis Location:https://us02web.zoom.us/j/88318429450? pwd=OVgrejdWZ2pDcE1RMG5Lb0NJM3hpUT09 Start:Thu 12/10/2020 3:00 PM End:Thu 12/10/2020 4:00 PM Recurrence:(none) Understood. Attendees will be: Mark English – Mee3eaa@aol.com Hank Rossi – hankrossi1940@outlook.com Nancy Lewis - pbpoa@pbpropertyowners.org Sue Filson is inviting you to a scheduled Zoom meeting. Join Zoom Meeting https://us02web.zoom.us/j/88318429450?pwd=OVgrejdWZ2pDcE1RMG5Lb0NJM3hpUT09 Meeting ID: 883 1842 9450 Passcode: 849822 One tap mobile +16468769923,,88318429450#,,,,,,0#,,849822# US (New York) +13017158592,,88318429450#,,,,,,0#,,849822# US (Washington D.C) Dial by your location +1 646 876 9923 US (New York) +1 301 715 8592 US (Washington D.C) +1 312 626 6799 US (Chicago) +1 408 638 0968 US (San Jose) +1 669 900 6833 US (San Jose) +1 253 215 8782 US (Tacoma) +1 346 248 7799 US (Houston) 877 853 5257 US Toll-free 888 475 4499 US Toll-free 833 548 0276 US Toll-free 833 548 0282 US Toll-free Meeting ID: 883 1842 9450 Passcode: 849822 Find your local number: https://us02web.zoom.us/u/kdzMVyTGHZ This is confirming the Zoom meeting between Commissioner McDaniel and the Pelican Bay Property Owners for Thursday, December 10th at 3:00 p.m. Can you please forward Zoom invite to me? 6 Thank you, Nancy Lewis for the Pelican Bay Property Owners Association Nancy Lewis, Operations Manager Pelican Bay Property Owners Association 1110 Pine Ridge Rd. Ste 303 Naples, FL 34108 Email: pbpoa@pbpropertyowners.org Phone:(239) 566-9707 Website: http://pbpoa.org/ 7 FilsonSue Subject:Buzz Victor 303-810-7374 re One Naples Location:BCC Office Start:Thu 3/5/2020 2:00 PM End:Thu 3/5/2020 2:30 PM Recurrence:(none) Organizer:McDanielBill 8 FilsonSue Subject:BCC Meeting - One Naples Location:BCC Chambers Start:Mon 3/1/2021 9:00 AM End:Mon 3/1/2021 5:00 PM Recurrence:(none) Organizer:FilsonSue Good afternoon, At today’s Special BCC Meeting, the Board confirmed March 1, with a continuation date of March 2 if necessary, to hold the BCC/One Naples Hearing Item, starting at 9:00. Please schedule your calendar(s), as well as (Aimee) the boardroom schedule. Thank you, MJ Mary-Jo Brock - Executive Assistant to Leo E. Ochs, Jr. maryjo.brock@colliercountyfl.gov County Manager’s Office 3299 East Tamiami Trail Naples FL 34112 239.252.8364 DECEIVED FEB 2 6 2021 ®# ;6A►#etc �� ,'�"', OFFICES OF COLLIER COUNTY J�18ti�x'# az' SOAAM OF COUNtly COM1B!' S!ONc4i k k t :0INV `. C .� 0 70 �. > cy A �Syr«, U .tom (O 0 i :.Cu" O N (U C U i1 cn 0 .0 .P ' C C- . y (1) p 0 :.r 0 W t0 W vi U ro t�; O >, r U7 Z i ".TIM_ o C N N 0 C m Q1 ° � ° ° H :ro�vG�°v �o - �aa N U N 0 N N N Q...YC m N N Q. •�p,.�-�i o i w .3 ro m F j-..O O c mz aai�oNu°��voaGm'o��oa�c�°roo�, �. .,.:. o °o o..� a ow a��.va"�3z °tea sG a 0 olJ ()n; /V+e LFs t 1i'MiL{t^t"^, A+LE 2zrr,-,ho(iL/-^tt /'"'', t, ,', -'2^-"/v;L"*E /4.1".- /.",,*,a,iE 1\fPr,a:, f- ),ierr-#/ E ' 34//Z D0 NoT Wnm sP ct 0EL0w NAPlfS, RORIOA ff"H.F;"FTdi*?= i-t i1 ,i r;..lir,l:; l:ri ..1-:.i;i':! rii,li,,,r,liir,ii,,,ri,itit,,,l,,l,it,i,Lir,,,,iil,,,llit,,,ir, RECEIVED Fr l g 70 1 Stuart and Associates Planning & Design Services OFFICES UP C,uW.JJ rl COUNTY 239 - 677 - 6126 Greg@Stuarturbandesign.com BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONER1$ 7910 Summerlin Lakes Drive Fort Myers, FL 33907 _ 97 Riverfront Drive Cashmere, WA 988915 February 18, 2021 To: From RE Madame Penny Taylor, Chairwoman Comrrrissioner William- McDaniel, Vice-chairman Commissioner Rick LoCastro Commissioner Andy Solis, Esq. Commissioner Burt Saunder, Esq, Greg Stuart, MAURP District 1 � . District 1 District 3 District 4 pistrict 5 VD V The 15 October SVB Evidence Book Transmittal -The One Naples MPUD Hearing For your convenience and consideration, I am transmitting to you the identical evidence book that was handed over to the Applicant, Collier Staff and the P & Z Commission. Though all of the materials are on the record and should be included in your upcoming agenda packet, the tabbed book format provides a more readily accessible means to evaluate the project for the 1 March hearing. In representing Save Vanderbilt Beach and addressing Commissioner McDaniels recent request to identify some of my clients objections to the project in lieu of a meeting, as a summary: 1. Doubling coastal high hazard density without appropriate hurricane evacuation mitigation is bad public policy; the 31.7 unit per acre density is far greater & not compatible with the neighborhoods 19.8 units per acre. 2. The project's high density drives parking demand which in turn underpins the the project's non - complementary and non -compatible city -block wide 35-ft tall parking garage (note, there is nothing like what is being proposed in SW Florida). 3. The project's high density drives the applicant's need for non -compatible 186-ft building height and 15-ft setback development standards; the neighborhood's average front yard setback is 49-ft and average building height is 7.4 stories. 4. The project's high density drives the applicant's need for zero functional common open space with a design that relies on a, by definition, non -permitted rooftop open space. 5. As per the Applicant, the project's main benefit is a $350Kto $400Ktraffic light contribution, which can be easily funded by the County; the project's access and circulation plan impairs public vehicular and pedestrian safety and convenience. Respectively, i M Greg Stuart, MAURP GS/dod20003/19Feb21_Stuart_evidencebookcoverletter.pgs In March 1997, the Florida Su- preme Court held in Martin County u. Yusem, 22 FLW S156 (Fla. March 27, 1997) that all plan amendments are legislative, not quasi judicial, decisions. In April 1997, the Third District Court of Appeals in Debes u. City of Key West, 22 FLW D827 (Fla. 3rd DCA April 2, 1997) reminded lo- cal governments that there must still be a rational basis for legislative This year offers our Section many continuing and new opportunities and challenges. I'll outline a few of our priorities. First, membership. We need to grow the section, increase member participation in section activities, and recruit the next generation of section leaders. Several new Execu- tive Council members joined us this year and they reflect the diversity of our membership — a strength that has enabled us to mold consensus po- sitions which are generally viewed as Aftbalanced and objective. Nonetheless, all of our activities can benefit from increased member participation, pan lan amendments p...regardless of whether the quasi judicial or legisla- tive test is applied. In the arena of local government, decisions in the field of administra- tive law are generally not subject to Florida's Administrative Procedures Act,Korida Statutes Chapter 120. In recent years, rezonings and compre- hensive plan amendments have be- come increasingly difficult for both titularly those of you who have not served in the past. I encourage each of you to contact any section officer or Executive Council member if you wish to participate in section activ- ity. Elizabeth McArthur will chair the membership committee. Second, we will continue our pro- ductive CLE programs. Donna Blanton, CLE committee chair, and Mike Maida will spearhead a fall CLE program devoted to mediation in the administrative forum. Addi- tionally, we will consider programs addressing local government admin- istrative practice and a review and assessment of recent revisions to the local governments and administra- tive lawyers. Complex hearings are held before City and County Com- missions that are historically and politically more adept at malting leg- islative, rather than quasi judicial, decisions. Judicial review of these local decisions under Florida's Growth Management Act led to dif- fering District Court opinions and recent changes in the 50 year history continued, page 2 Administrative Procedure Act. Later in the year we will start planning the nextAdministrative Law Conference continued, page 2 INSIDE: Case Notes, Cases Noted and Notable Cases ......................... 4 Minutes....................................... 9 AdMi.nistrative Law Section Newsletter Volume 2M No. I September 1994 which will provide a use forum for discussing and exchanging ideas to unprove administrative law, practice, and procedure. The next Conference tentatively is scheduled for fall,1998. Third, we will amplify our efforts to establish a student administrative law writing contest. We hope this competition will be up and running this coming year. Also, with the lead- ership of Jim Rossi and Johnny Burris, we will establish a stronger working relationship with each state law school to promote and support teaching state administrative law. Section's active involvement in the We'll also consider joining with one development of administrative law of the law schools to produce a na- policy and practice. We will continue tional forum on significant emerging to work` with legislative staff and administrative law issues. committees on possible further revz- Fourth, our Public Utilities Cam- sions to the APA. We will assess the mMee chaired by Doe Horton' will effects of recent APA revisions and work on a forum that will `address the recently adopted Uniform Rules from various perspectives deregula- of Procedure. We will offer our assis- tion of electric utilities. This should tance to the Constitutional Revision be a timely and provocative session Commission, Past chairs Linda Rigot that will bring together public,' pri•• and Bill Williams will lead these en- vate, and citizen views on s i Ala deavors, taut public policy issue. In.all, we have another challenge - Fifth, we will publish our regular filled year, and I encourage those of newsletter and Bar Journal column. you who have not actively partici. Dave Watkins and Sean Frazier will pated in your Section, to become in chair these efforts. ' volved. Finally, we will maintain the Joinus. Let us hear from you. L®CAI, ADMIMSTRATdVE LAW «««««<¢««««««««««««««««««««««««< from ,page 1 of zoning law But the Supreme Court petition for writ of certiorari, if you (F1a.1992). To make this determina- I n Yusem, and the Third District are the applicant. Section 28 Partner- tion, the Florida Supreme Court re - Court of Appeals in Debes, recently ship, Ltd. v. Martin County, 642 So.2d quired local governments to conduct shed some new light into the murky 609 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994). If you are a functional analysis of each apphw waters of this increasingly -complex an affected citizen alleging that an cation. Actions which result in the area of administrative law, and re- action is inconsistent with the com- "formulation" of a general rule of membered lessons of the past. prehensive plan, judicial review is policy are legislative. But actions With the advent of Florida's : available solely in an original action which result in the "application" of a Growth Management Act in 1985, under Florida Statutes §163.3215. general rule of policy are quasi Ju& the zoning of property, previously Although ultimately subject to Juw cial. Snyder. From Snyder (in 1993) treated as a purely "legislative" de- dicial review, it is the local govern.- until now, this functionalanalyses cision, must now survive an increas- ments that must initially decide was applied to both rezonings and ingly technical array of standards, whether an action is legislative or plan amendments on a case -by -case criteria and different avenues of ju- quasi judicial because each type of basis. Plan amendments or rezonings dicial review. Legislative actions are action has its own procedures, star- could be either quasi judicial or leg- reviewable under the fairly debat- dards and methods of review. See, islative. And every case required able standard in an original action. Board of County Commissionersof analyses. Martin County a Section 28 Partner Brevard County a Snyder, 627 So.2d But in Yusem, the Supreme Court ship, Ltd., 676 So.2d 532 (Fla. 4th 469 (Fla. 1993); Jennings v. Dade restoa.ed a bit of common sense to the DCA 1996). The denial of a quasiju- County, 589 So.2d 1337 (Fla.3rdDCA process and held that amending a dicial application is reviewable by 1991), review denied, 598 So.2d 75 plan was just like adopting an origi- nal plan. A plan amendment was leg This newsletter is prepared and published bytheAdministsative Law Section of`I'heFlorida Bar. RobertM. Rhodes, Tallahassee............................................................................... Chair M. Catherine Lannon, Tallahassee ............. .............................. ............. Chairelect Mary F. Smallwood,'ihllahaeaee ............................................................. Treasurer Dan R. Stengle,Tallahassee ........................... Secretary Elizabeth W. McArthur, Tallahassee .............................. Co-editor ....... ...... .... Dan R. Stengle,Tallahassee..............................:.......................................:.....» Co-editor Jaelde Werndli, Tallahassee ................................... ProgramAdministrator Lynn M. Brady, Tallahassee.................:......................................................... T ayout Statements or expressions of opinion or comments appearing herein. are those of the edi- tors and contributors and not of The Florida Bar or the Section. _islative because it involved the for - .mutation of a general rule of policy, regardless of the size of the parcel or number of people affected. All plan amendments are legislative. Martin County v. Yusem, 22=FLW S156 (Fla. March 27,1997). The Supreme Court also confirmed that judicial review of a plan amendment, alegislative act, is available in an original action filed in circuit court. Yusem, citing Hirt u. Polk County Board of County Com _ missioners, 578 So.2d 415, 416 (Fla x 2d DCA 1991). Although' all elan amendments 0 Tolume XM No. I September 1997 Administrative Law Section Newsletter are conclusively legislative, the func- tional analyses must still be applied to rezonings. Comprehensive rezonings that affect a large area or portion of the public are legislative determinations subject to the fairly debatable standard of review. But rezomngs that affect a limited area or number of persons are quasi Judi- cial decisions, subject to a higher de- gree of scrutiny under the two prong test set forth in Snyder. In a quasi- judicial rezoning, the applicant has the burden of proving that the appli- cation is consistent with the compre- hensive plan and complies with pro- cedural requirements. Once this burden is met, the burden shifts to local government to demonstrate a valid, legitimate public purpose for maintaining the existing designa- tion. Snyder at 474-476. This sounds simple enough. Plan amendments are legislative. Rezonings require functional analy- ses. But what if applications for a plan amendment and rezoning are filed at the same time? The District Court cases that arose in Snyder's wake often considered applications that combined rezonings with plan 0 amendments, and the reviewing Courts failed to make a distinction between the two applications, fur- ther leading to the confusion. These dual applications were pro- cessed at the same time in order to reduce the extraordinary amount of time needed to proceed on a plan amendment and then a subsequent rezoning under Florida's Growth Management Act, Florida Statutes §§ 163.3184 and 163.3187. Proposed plan amendments must first be transmitted to various state agencies including the Department of Com- mumtyAffairs. Only after review can an amendment be adopted and must be submitted to DCA once again for a second compliance review under the Growth Management Act. Florida Statutes §163.3184. Gener- ally, larger -scale plan amendments can only be adopted twice per year, but smaller scale amendments af- fecting less than 10 acres can be sub- mitted more frequently. Florida Stat- ute §163.3187. Rezonings can be accomplished more quickly and fre- quently. But rezonmgs must still be in compliance with each and every element of the comprehensive plan, i.e., frequently necessitating the si- multaneous plan amendment. Because different standards apply to legislative plan amendments and rezonings, it would be easier to de- fend decisions in which plan amend- ments are heard first, in a separate hearing prior to the rezoning. All to frequently, a plan amendment and a rezoning application are heard to- gether in one hearing, usually at the request of an eager applicant whose project awaits approval. The best strategy, in light of Yusem, is to de- cide the legislative plan amendment first. Even if both hearings occur at the same meeting. The first decision, a legislative plan amendment, is easier to uphold. In most cases, the legislative decision on the plan amendment will form the basis for a quasi judicial decision on the under- lying rezoning application. Only then should the hearing on the quasi ju- dicial rezoning application be heard. A separate hearing meeting the sub- stantive and procedural require- ments of Snyder can then be con- vened. Remember, even a quasi judicial rezoning application that is consis- tent with the plan or adopted plan amendment can be denied if a legiti- mate public purpose exists to keep the existing zoning in place under the second prong of the test set forth in Snyder. Snyder at 476. Does this "legitimate public purpose" standard closely parallel the "fairly debatable"or "rational basis" test applied to purely legislative deci- sions? And in the end, is there any real, practical difference? The Su- preme Court reminded us in Snyder (1993), and again in Yusem (1997), that a "land use plan must be based on adequate data and analysis in providing for gradual and ordered growth in the future use of land." Even legislative plan amendments must still have a rational basis that is supported by competent, substan- tial evidence. That is the underlying constitutional basis for all modern zoning and growth management sys- tems. We must not forget the historical, constitutional basis for zoning estab- lished in Euclid v. Ambler, 272 U S. 365 (1926). It is worth remembering that only on a motion for rehearing in Euclid was the United States Su- preme Court persuaded to change its collective mind and hold zoning con- stitutional. Land Use, Callies and Freilich, West Publishing (1986), p. 47, note 9. Since the Euclid decision in-1926, zoning has become a part of almost all local government codes. It is also in Euclid that the "fairly de- batable" standard was first enunci- ated in the context of zoning; "if the validity of the legislative classifica- tion for zoning purposes be fairly debatable, the legislative judgment must be allowed to control." The Euclid court also discussed in detail many public purposes that formed the rational basis for zoning districts limiting the allowable uses of land. Two years after Euclid, United States Supreme Court again exam- ined a residentially -zoned parcel ad- joining established industrial uses. The Court held that the line of sepa- ration between the residential and in district, which transected an existing commercial building, was unconstitutional because it lacked a rational basis. Nectow v. City of Cam- bridge, 277 US.183 (1928). The zon- ing district was not supported by a fairly debatable rational basis. Usu- ally, the rational basis, or lack of a rational basis, can be found by look- ing at a map of the surrounding uses and asking a simple question: "Does it make sense?" (see, Nectow, zoning map, included in the opinion). After nearly 50 years of zoning decisions and growth management legislation, the Third District re- cently brought us back to earth. In Debes, theThird District reversed the denial of even a "legislative" plan an (from Residential to Commercial) because it resulted in "discriminatory spot zoning — or, in this context, spot planning — in re- verse." Under the Court's analysis even a legislative decision must have some rational basis supported by competent, substantial evidence, es- pecially in cases that raise the old specter of "spot zoning," or the cre- ation of small zoning islands or pock- ets unsupported by any rational ba- sis. The City's stated reasons for maintaining the residential zoning in Debes lacked both a rational basis and could not be supported by com- petent, substantial evidence. The Court found that the City's general. continued... 3 ized concerns about additional traf= fic that would be generated by com- mercial uses was insufficient to re- tain residential spot zoning. Traffic concurrency and levels of service were properly considered during site plan review once a specific project was proposed. In addition, the City's desire to:build affordable housing on the privately -held parcel was also an insufficient basis to deny the appli- cation. The plan amendment or re- zoning application should be consid- ered "without regard to the one paxiicular use which the. owner might then intend to make of the various uses permitted under a proper zoning category" Debes, citing Porpoise Point Partnership u. ,8't. John's County, 470 So.2d 850 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985). Affordable housing, although desirable, could have sup- ported condemnation for that use, but "emphatically may not be pro- moted on the back of a private prop- erty owner ..." Fven the "fairly debatable" test applied to legislative acts, could not In a key land use law case, the Florida Supreme Court in Martin County v. Yusem; 22 Fla. L. Weekly 5156 (Fla. Sup. Ct.,1Vlarch 27,1997), took out its bright line marker and answered in the negative the follow- ing question certified by the Fourth DCA as being of great public impor- tance: Can a rezoning decision which has limited impact underSnyder but does require an amendment of the comprehensive land use plan still be a quasi judicial decision subject to strict scrutiny review? The Snyder case referenced in the certified question is Board of County Commissioners a Snyder, 627 So: 2d 469 (Fla: ].993), in which the Florida Supreme Court had held that rezon- ing actions that have a Limited im- rescue the City from what the Dis- trict Court called a decision that "so fundamentally and seriously departs from the controlling law that a mis- carriage of justice has resulted ..." The Court nosed that regardless of whether the decision was character- ized as legislative or quasi-judicial, the decision to deny the request could not be upheld under any test. "As we suspect is very often the case, the application of any possible for- mulation of the showing. necessary either to support or to overturn a'lo- cal government's decision of the present kind, including the "fairly debatable" standard deemed appro- priate in Martin County v. Yusem .. would yield the same result." Debes, 22 FLW at' D828, n.4. (emphasis added). Local governments must not only determine whether a rezoningappli- cation is consistent with each and every element, policy and objective in the Comprehensive Plan under Snyder and Machado v. Musgrove, 519 So.2d 629, 635 (Fla. 3rd DCA 1987), theremust be a rational basis to support the designation and the district's boundaries: Euclid Nectow. Without afairly-debatable, rational relationship to the health, safety or r `r r t. pact on the public and that can be seen as policy applications rather than policy setting, are quasi judicial decisions. The Snyder decision sug- gested that's functional test was to be applied to determine whether the impact of the action' is lixrited; look.- ing at such -factors as whether the parcel of land at issue was owned by only one person. That was the situa- lion presented inthe Yusemcase, in- volving one 64-acre parcel owned by one person for which a density rezon- ing and comprehensive plan amend- went were sought. However, in Yusem, the Court re- ceded from any notion that a func- tional test could be applied to deter- mine that a rezoning. decision had. limited impact and was therefore morals of the community and compe- tent, substantial evidence to support the rational basis and district bound- ary, the Third District held that the i zoning designation "is based on no more than the fact that those who support it have the power to work their will." Debes. The United States Supreme Court stated in 1926'that such an ordinance "passes the bounds"of reason and assumes the character of a merely arbitrary fiat." Euclid uAmbler,272 US: 365 (1926) Although the .early Supreme Court cases of .Euclid and Nectou! were not cited inYusem orDebes they should not be forgotten by local gov- ernments or local administrative law practitioners. Although many .state and regional land use schemes have been adoptedl in the 50 years since. these early cases, a rational basis supported by competent, substantial evidence ig still required for ail mod- ern comprehensive plans and zoning designations. ' E.g., $awaii's state Iand nee act, Oregon's and Florida's Growth Management Act and the Tahoe Regional Planning Act, which was the subject of a recent United States Supreme Court opinion in Suitim v. Tahoe regional Planning Couttcil, Slip Op. 96- 243 (May 27,1997). .�, quasi: judicial, where. the -rezoning. request also requixes a comprehen- sive .plan amendment. As the Court held, "While we continue io adhere to our analysis in Snyder�with respect to the types of rezonngs at.issue in that case, we do -not extend that analysis or endorse a functional, fact- . intensive approach to determining whether amendments to local com- prehensive land use plans.. are legis- lative decisions. Rather, we expressly conclude that amendments to com- prehensive land use plains are Iegis- lative'decisions" 22 Fla. L. Weekly at S1'58. As legislative decisions, com- prehensive land :use. plan amend- ment decisions are subject to the. fairly debatable standard of review, which, as the .Court reminded, is a E STUARTANDASSOCIATES Planning & Design Services 12/01/20 REVISED EXHIBIT LIST CASE _ THE ONE NAPLES GMP MAP AMENDMENT, MUPD REZONING & STREET VACATION PREPARED FOR _SAVE VANDERBILT BEACH Exhibit One _Greg Stuart, MAURP Qualifications and Experience -Resume Exhibit Two _The One Naples Site Highest &Best Use -Applicant's Alternative 100,000 SF Retail Is Nonsense, Is Not Feasible & Is Not Highest and Best Use Exhibit Three _ The Adjacent Neighborhood Density Building Height &Setbacks Exhibit For Neighborhood Complementary and Compatibility Analysis - Neighborhood Average Density @ 19.8 per ac., Ave. Height @ 7.4 Stories & Ave. Setback @ 494t. Exhibit Four _ A Complementary and Compatibility Assessment Between Site C-3 Zoning and Proposed MUPD - Existing C-3 Zoning More Compatible Than One Naples Exhibit Five _ Regulatory Framework &Key Collier County Rules and Definitions For Approval - One Naples Open Space & Character Do Not Meet County Rules & Definitions Exhibit Six _The One Naples Collier County Growth Management Plan Internal Consistency Assessment - One Naples Not Consistent w./23 Land Use, Transportation & Coastal Management Goals, Objectives and Policies Exhibit Seven _Street Vacation Value and Applicant Benefit Assessment -Public Street Vacation Grants $6.3MM to $7.4MM Special Benefit To Applicant Exhibit Eight _Part One The One Naples Plan Amendment &Rezoning -The One Naples Presentation and Factual Basis For Project Denial Exhibit Nine _Part Two Required Compatibility Standards and Polices -The Save Vanderbilt Beach Alternative Design Standards For Compatible Development Exhibit Ten The Staff 25-ft with Optional 15-ft Staff Vanderbilt Bch Rd /Gulf Shore Dr Setback Condition -Facts Supporting The Optional 15-ft Standard As Functionally Appropriate 5 Dec P & Z Supplemental Exhibits: Exhibit 11 _The 30 October Pelican Bay Foundation Letter Opposing The Use Of The Pelican Bay PUD For Building Height and Density - Jim Hoppensteadt, Pres. & COO STUARTANDASSOCIATES Planning & Design Services 12/30/20 5 Items That Demonstrate A Failure To Provide Mandated and Relevant Discretionary Information As Per Collier County Land Development and Administrative Codes 1. Hurricane Evacuation Mitigation Plan (mandatory): FINDING _The Applicant fails to provide for required hurricane evacuation mitigation while doubling density in Collier County Is Coastal High Hazard zone. - Rule: Coastal Management GM Policy 12.1.2: - "Land use plan amendments in the Category 1 hurricane vulnerability zone shall only be considered if such increases in densities provide appropriate mitigation to reduce the impacts of hurricane evacuation times." - FACT _One Naples's 174 cots is hurricane shelter mitigation, not evacuation time mitigation; the application is not consistent with 12.1.2. - FACT _Collier Staff requires One Naples to provide 174 cots and an enclosed utility trailer; cots and a trailer cannot be, by definition, evacuation mitigation; cots and a trailer are shelter requirements. - FACT _The request doubles density in a coastal high hazard zone and is required to provide evacuation mation; this fact leads to GMP internal inconsistent problems in violation of FSS 163.1772(2). • COMMENT _ By not providing for explicitly mandated evacuation mitigation, it is not logical for Staff to conclude that the project complies with the Collier County Growth Management Plan. • COMMENT _ 174 cots and an enclosed utility trailer present a value of $36.3K; the County's One Naples 0.79 acre ROW vacation grants the applicant an estimated benefit value between $6.3MM to $7.4MM. Page 1 of 7 STUARTANDASSOCIATES Planning & Design Services 12/30/20 2. Demonstration of Adequate Open Space (mandatory): FINDING _ The Applicant fails to demonstrate 30% Open Space adequacy. RUIe: Open Space Dimensional Standard LDC 4.02.01: "In developments of commercial, industrial and mixed use including residential, at least 30% of the gross area shall be devoted to usable open space." - Rule Open Space Pre -application Meeting LDC 10 02 13 B 1 e and Open Space Planning_Commission Hearing and Recommendation LDC 10.02.13.B.5.e: e "The adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the development." - FACT _One Naples has not demonstrated that the MCP provides for 30% open space. The project's Exhibit B Development Standards table does not include total project open space standards, the Exhibit C MCP does not include a total project open space table, and the Exhibit E Deviations does not request an open space deviation. • COMMENT _ It is logically impossible to demonstrate adequacy of project open space without a project open space table and/or related data. - FACT _The Code requires demonstration of open space adequacy at the zoning stage, not at the final site development plan stage; the MCP is out of compliance with Collier rules 4.02.01 and 10,02.13.13.5.e. - FACT _One Naples original application included a deviation to use roof top private recreational open space at a maximum 159/o; the deviation request was withdrawn. - FACT _Rooftops used to meet regulatory open space require a deviation as per Open Space definition (see below); One Naples roof top open space is on areas occupied by buildings and is not permissible, • CODE DEFINITION _LDC 1.08.02 Open space: "Areas that are not occupied by buildings, impervious parking areas, streets, driveways or loading areas and which maybe equipped or developed with amenities designed to encourage the use and enjoyment of the space either privately or by the general public." Page 2 of 7 STUARTANDASSOCIATES Planning & Design Services 12/30/20 3. Architectural Elevations w./Cross-sections (discretionary): FINDING _ The Applicant fails to provide actual and scalable Architectural Elevations N./Street Cross -sections; this fact directly impacts a professional assessment of One Naples neighborhood compatibility; the Applicant's 3-D Renderings are non -binding illustrations. - Rule: LDC 10.02.13 A-F: 35. "When determined necessary to adequately assess the compatibility of proposed uses to existing or other proposed uses, relationship to open space, recreation facilities, or traffic impacts, or to assess requests for reductions in dimensional standards, the Planning & Zoning Division Director may request schematic architectural drawings (floor plans, elevations, perspectives) for all proposed structures and improvements, as appropriate." - Rule: Collier Administrative Code Sec. G.1 PUD Master Plan Contents: "Pursuant to LDC subsection 10.02.13 A, the MPUD Master Plan will graphically illustrate the development strategy, using The Community Character Plan For Collier County, Florida (April 2001) as a guide for development and redevelopment." • FACT _The Applicant has limited its application to submitting unscaled and unmeasurable architectural perspective renderings that are not tied to any development commitment(s) in the MPUD Ordinance, Exhibit A PUD Uses, Exhibit B MPUD Development Standards, and Exhibit CA (see Staff Attachment A BOCC Packet); the One Stock Architectural graphics are non -binding illustrations. • COMMENT _ It is difficult if not impossible to make a logical determination whether a project has compatible and complementary architectural setbacks, height, scale and mass without measurable architectural elevations and cross sections. Unscaled and unmeasurable 3-D drawings do not offer best professional practices when determining development neighborhood fit and compatibility. • FACT The PUD Master Plan exhibit does not illustrate the Community Character Plan development strategy, as is mandated by 10.02.13.A; the application is out of compliance with Collier rule 10.02.13.A. Page 3 of 7 STUARTANDASSOCIATES Planning & Design Services 12/30/20 4. Traffic _ Southbay Drive Connection Separation Reduction, and Safe Ingress and Egress (mandatory): FINDING _ The Applicant fails to provide neighborhood driving safety analysis and conform to best transportation planning practices since the project reduces Southbay Drive connection separation spacing by 215-ft +/ while introducing a new, 4th leg, eastbound movement at the congested parking garage intersection now aligned at the project's primary gateway. The Application fails to meet its density entitlement criteria. - Rule: LDC Residential Density &Traffic 4.07.02.B.3a&b: "The BCC may lessen density or intensity of development when it has been determined that development to the maximum density or intensity permissible in this section would: a. Create inconvenient or unsafe access to the PUD; or b. Create traffic congestion in the streets which adjoin or lead to the PUD" - Rule: Transportation Objective 7: "Develop and adopt standards for safe and efficient ingress and egress to adjoining properties, and encourage safe and convenient on -site traffic circulation through the development review process.' - FACT _One Naples reduces Southbay Drive intersection connection separation from 565-ft. +/- to 350-ft +/-, sound transportation planning and design employs increasing and not decreasing intersection connection spacing. - FACT _ A noteworthy reduction to intersection connection spacing reduces driver response time, which directly and negatively impacts public traveling safety; this issue is completely ignored by applicant and staff. - FACT _One Naples introduces a new project southbound left -out turning movement towards US 41. This new fourth leg turning movement at the already problematic public parking garage intersection will conflict with existing turning movements into and out of the parking garage (see next page graphic). - FACT _ The Applicant and Staff did not analyze public safety impacts from combining Southbay Dr intersection separation reduction with the new"4th leg" parking garage; the application is out of compliance with Collier rule 4.07.02.B. 3.a & 3.b and fails to meet density entitlement standards. Page 4 of 7 STUARTANDASSOCIATES Planning & Design Services 12/30/20 A 565-ft +/- Southbay Dr Connection Separation & A 3-leg" Parking Garage Intersection. A 350-ft +/- Southbay Dr Connection Separation & A "4-leg" Parking Garage Intersection. . Project Creates New East Bound Left -out Turning Conflicts w,/West Bound Into Garage Turning Movements While Reducing Intersection Connection Separation Exlsting Southbay Dr. 4 Leg Intersestlon _ Non -examined Impacts: New Turning Movement w./Parking Garage Conflicts Combinedft w./215-. Spacing Reduction Alternative Restricted Project Gateway VBR Access &Continuous VBR Pathway Not Analyzed; Underscores 4.07.02.B Failure Re. Inconvenient Site Accesvadabill ram s and Traffic Congestion Rule. LIMITED VBR PROJECT GATEWAY ACCESS & CONTINUOUS PEDESTRIAN PATHWAY ALTERNATIVES FOR VEHICULAR & PEDESTRIAN SAFETY •� �•� �•r►�. 25-h. Tall LDC 4.02.36 23-h. Wide Mixed Use Pathway t Improves Neighborhood Vehicular Circulation _Regatta, Barefoot Pelican, Others w.Mew Round -about Route Option For Eastbound Movement Improves Neighborhood Pedestrian Circulation _ A Continuous Mixed -Use Pathway Designed At The Human Scale It is not logical for finding that One Naples does not "create inconvenient or unsafe access", and "create traffic congestion in the streets which adjoin or lead to the PUD" without analyzing the 2154t. intersection spacing reduction combined with introducing the new "4th Leg" at the already problematic parking garage intersection. Page 5 of 7 STUARTANDASSOCIATES Planning & Design Services 12/30/20 5. PUD Master Concept Plan Required Elements (mandatory): FINDING _ The Applicant fails to provide required drainage, open space and marina information on the Master Concept Plan; the project does not comply with Rule G.1. RUI=a Administrative Code G.1 Rezoning To A PUD Master Plan Contents "Boundaries and dimensions of all proposed tracts or increments with an indication of the proposed land use category, including but not limited to: Lakes and/or other water management facilities; Common open space; and Marina upland uses including underground fuel storage area and spill containment area, ships store, parking and circulation, and service areas". - FACT _ The Applicant's Master Concept Plan Ex. C does not depict surface water management areas and common open space areas; the application does not comply with the Code. • COMMENT _Common open space areas are to reduce appearance of density and to provide for functional uses; One Naples requires common open space to reduce intensity & appearance. • COMMENT _Applicant and Staff failure to specifically identify common open space, as required by Code, further aggravates project neighborhood complementary and compatibility issues. - FACT _One Naples proposes up to a 99 slip marina, which is larger than the 84 slip Naples City Dock, without providing any substantial information such as. 01 Location of underground fuel storage and fuel containment area. Location of marina parking and circulation area(s). Location of marina service and loading areas. • COMMENT _ The Application fails to comply with the Collier Code. - FACT _The One Naples MPUD Ordinance, Exhibit A PUD Uses, Exhibit B MPUD Development Standards and Exhibit C.1 permits by right aback -bay marina restaurant without any outdoor noise, light and amplified music compatibility and nuisance conditions. - FACT The application and MPUD ordinance does not provide for any Florida Clean Marina Program standards; this failure reflects a complete lack of marina data and analysis. Page 6 of 7 STUARTANDASSOCIATES Planning & Design Services 12/30/20 EXAMPLE COLLIER REVIEW PROCESS & ONE MAPLES INFORMATION SUFFICIENCY REQUEST RESPONSE Re. ARCHITECTURE James Sabo. AIC'P, Principal Planner Re: One Naples PUDZ (PL-20190000697) HAI File No.: 2016.025 Alay 29. 2020 Page 8 infonnation such as other project history or shtdies to support this statement. Response: This ronturerrl has been addressed. All ojll►e rev/sed Spne/rro at►alpses have been provided to the retdetver. 13. Please detail the method for calculating the results found i❑ the Percent hnproved vs Existing column of the Vanderbilt Beach Road Operational Analysis Results table. The table footnote states that this was determined based on a comparison between the westbound weekend queues at Gulf Shore Dr. However. calculating the percent change when comparing the 1.765-value listed in the table for the westbound queue from Scenario 1 B to the 1.631 listed for the westbound queue in Scenario 2 results in an improvement of 8% instead of the listed 25. Comparing the 1.765 from Scenario 1B to the 595 for Scenario 3 results in an unprovement of 660b instead of the 73% listed in the table. If the fttll queue value of 1.917 front the Synchro analysis is used instead of the 1,765 shown in the table. the numbers still do not match. In that case comparing 1.917 (adjusted per Synchro output) front Scenario 113 to 1.631 from Scenario 2 results in 15%. C'ontparing 1.917 (adjusted per Synchro output) from Scenario 113 to 595 from Scenario 3 results in 690,1o. These still do not match the percent improvement values of 250o and 73020 presented in the table. Response: The total westbound queue is not 1,765 feel As ntenlioned in footnote No. 1 of the firs) table, the tvestbotutd gnerre is bc;pond dre I BR/f'anrlerbllt Drhe intersection. Tlrere fora, the Iola! queue Is 1,765 feel plus 422 feet (RB queue at T BR/f'anderbill Dr intersection) or 2,187 jeer. The lutproveuteut percentages apere then calculated based on the cotuparisou to the total westbound queue of 2,187 feet. See revised foolnotes on Vanderbilt Beach Road Operational Auatrsis Results tables located In the Appendix B. ZONI\G REVIEW - JA\IES SABO 11. At the March 3rd NIA/f. a conunihnent was made to provide renderings of the size and dimensions of the ro osed bttildutes. Provide renderitt s of the ro osed buildittes showitt dimensions. Response: This is not a "safficleuep"issue. COMMENT _Though the Applicant commits to providing accurately sized and dimensioned Towers and buildings to the public, the applicant does not provide the very same scaled architectural design information needed to determine neighborhood complementary "fit" and compatibility. Page 7 of 7 S I UARTANDASSOCIATES Planning & Design Services Exhibit One Greg Stuart Expert Testimony Qualifications and Experience Case _The One Naples GMP Map Amendment, MUPD Rezoning &Street Vacation Greg Stuart, MAURP LAND PLANNER/URBAN DESIGN PRINCIPAL Professional Expertise in Comprehensive Land Use Planning, Urban Design, Land Development Entitlements, Project Management, Expert Planning Testimony and Real Estate Investment and Development PROFILE Mr. Stuart is a highly experienced professional land use planner & executive with over three + decades of experience and success in urban & regional planning, land development & finance, entitlements, regulatory development, governmental relations and communications. EXPERIENCE VP, Stuart and Marquez, Gainesville/Jacksonville, FL 1984 — 1990 Director of Planning, Hole Montes & Ass, Fort Myers, FL 1990 - 1992 President, Stuart and Associates, Fort Myers, FL 1993 - current Senior Principal, Eagle Real Estate, Cape Coral, FL 1998 - 2008 Senior Principal, Southland Group, Bonita Springs, FL 2009 — 2011 Senior Associates, RW Thorpe & Associates, Mercer Island, WA 2016 Comprehensive Land Use Planning, Zoning &Sector Planning Broad experience in growth management, governmental relations, land use analysis, long range planning and regulatory implementation. Notable accomplishments include the Bonita Springs 5200 ac. Sector Plan, the Matlacha SF Residential Overlay, the 2015 Pine Island Plan Restudy & TUD Ordinance, and Lee Co. Comprehensive Plan oversight via 10-year Local Planning Agency member (5 yr. Chairman). Administration and Business Management Noted for team -oriented business management methods; expertise in budgets, finance, strategic planning, governmental relations, public communications, contracts and negotiations. Business background gained from owning and/or being a senior partner for 4 profitable consulting & real estate development/investment practices. Urban Design, Entitlements and Public Communications Highly recognized for consensus oriented public and agency permitting implementation (80 + cases), environmental design, local, state & federal entitlements and project implementation. Notable examples include the Suwannee Trails Camp Resort, Treehouse Village, Judd Creek Preserve PD, Bonita Springs Home Depot & Heritage Cove RPD. Land Development, Project Management &Real Estate Successful track record in land development, including acquisition, financial analysis & project management; notable $2361viM 20-month concurrent design, permitting and construction for 3 FL marinas. Professional Planning Expert Testimony Mr. Stuart is an acknowledged leading expert in Land Use Planning, Condemnation and Inverse Condemnation, with over 130 Judicial & Quasi-judicial cases; successfully defended Lee County in a $74MM inverse condemnation mine case. 7910 Summerlin Lakes Dr. Fort Myers, FL 33907 97 Riverfront Drive Cashmere, WA 98815 C 239.67T6126 Greg@Stuarturbandesign.com www.Stuarturbandesign.com QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERTISE Comprehensive Land Use Planning Planning, Zoning and Growth Management Land Use and Market Feasibility Analysis Site Planning, Urban Design and & Environmental Design Local, State and Federal Land Development Permitting & Entitlements Land Development &Marina Development Project Management Real Estate Investment, Finance and Underwriting Governmental Relations and Public Communications ACADEMIC BACKGROUND AND CREDENTIALS Danish Academy of Fine Arts, College of Architecture &Urban Design; Post -graduate Fellow University of Florida, Masters ofArts in Urban & Regional Planning, full HUD Scholarship University of Florida, Bachelor of Arts in Urban Studies, Magna Cum Laude • Awarded HUD Planning Fellowship for Full Graduate Studies, University of Florida • Awarded Denmark International Studies Fellowship, University of Copenhagen • Awarded Graduate Design Fellowship, Danish Academy of Arts Expert Testimony ROFESSIONAL AFFILIATIONS P2 Fort Myers Board of Realtors, Associate Urban Land Institute, Associate American Planning Association, Associate Greg Stuart, MAURP SUMMARY Mr. Stuart is a highly experienced urban planner and designer, with experience gained from two professional consulting practices anc a senior Principal in 2 real estate investment and brokerage firms. With extensive expertise in land development, business management and public communications, his expertise includes urban design, land use planning, land development permitting, project management and expert testimony. Earning a B.A in Urban Studies (High Honors), a M.A. in Urban & Regional Planning from the University of Florida, and a Fellowship at the Danish Royal Academy, Mr. Stuart has extensive legislative, quasi-judicial and growth management case experience throughout Florida and Washington State, QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERIENCE Mr. Stuart's professional experience spans thirty plus years of local, regional and international professional business and consulting. Mr. REPRESENTATIVE Stuart has directed land use planning, design, permitting and project management tasks for public and private sector interests, has been the CLIENT LIST Principal Planner or Project Manager for more than 80 major development projects throughout FL, GA and WA, and has provided The Geo Group, Inc. expert testimony for over 130 quasi-judicial & judicial cases. Sakata Seed Of North America Comprehensive Land Use Planning and Sector Planning Davis Wright Tremaine Mr. Stuart has designed and directed scores of land use planning projects, such as the mixed -use 196-ac. Judd Creek Preserve Stephans & Klinge, LLP residential projects (Cape Coral FL 2003-2006), recreational vehicle resorts (Director of Development, the Suwannee Trails Camp Resort (a City of Vero Beach 2800-acre 6-mile riverfront DR], 1985-88), and institutional mixed use Lee County, FL projects (Project Manager/Principal Planner for the 6,400-ac. Pine Creek Ranch and FGCU Charlotte County Campus 2004-08). Public Town of Fort Myers Beach, FL sector comprehensive planning includes directing/designing the Bonita Springs 5200 ac. NE Quadrant Sector Plan, various EAR and Lee Plan Ingman Marine amendments, NW Cape Coral & 7 Island Plan (2014), the 2015 Pine Tibbetts Lumber Island Plan Restudy & TDU Ordinance revision, & the Matlacha SF Residential Overlay ordinance. As a Lee County Planning Lennar US Homes Commissioner (1992-02; 5 yr. Chairman) under his leadership, the Home Depot Corp. County adopted new rules for commercial architectural design, upgraded the landscaping code, implemented electronic signs regulatory reform, Ronto Development Corp. executed concurrency management ordinance reform and strengthened disclosure practices. Other notable achievements include community Collier Co., FL sector planning review and standards, co -directing the County/FGCU City of Cape Coral, FL 50-meter Pool Inter -local Agreement with $4.7MM matching funding, City of Bonita Springs Land Development & Real Estate As a principle in the Southland Group, he directed/managed over 3 Realmark Properties, Inc. dozen underwriting, finance and restructuring real estate development Carroll Properties/Gulf Star Marine projects, including the Gulf Coast Health Park. As a principle with Eagle Realty of SW FL he directed a $365MM private investment Yacht Clubs of the Americas, LLC portfolio featuring up to 16 assets throughout FL. He was responsible for the acquisition, syndication and funding for the Telegraph Creek University of Florida Foundation Ranch, the Hendry County River Ranch, Judd Creek and 13 other Ingman Marine development and real estate investment projects. As a partner and project manager he was co -responsible for finance, entitlements and Banks Engineering project management for a $236MM 3 bundled marina project (YCOA Tampa, Naples, Key West; 2004-2008). He co -directed the YCOA Knott Consoer PA business plan, debt and equity raise, project design, construction and Select Real Estate of SW FL operations and successfully met the challenge of simultaneous permitting and construction for 3 marina resorts in 20 months. PROFESSIONAL APPOINTMENTS AND COMMUNITY AFFAIRS • Appointed Chairman, Lee County Local Planning Agency (1992 -- 2002) • Appointed as a Director, the Real Estate Investment Society (1994 — 1997) • Appointed as a Director, the Economic Development Coalition (1996 - 1997) • Appointed to the Lee County Land Development Code Advisory Committee (1996) • Appointed to the Lee County School Boards Construction Advisory Committee (1991) 3 • Appointed to Lee County's Affordable Housing Committee (1992) Greg Stuart, MAURP QUALIFICATIONS AND EXPERIENCE (cont.) NOTABLE QUALIFICATIONS AND Mr. Stuart's land development and real estate experience includes acquisition EXPERIENCES analysis and feasibility, financial underwriting, contracts and asset dispensation. • Successfully directed and/or was the senior planning principal for Planning, Zoning and Urban Design over 130+quasl-judicial and Mr. Stuart designed, planned, permitted and directed Treehouse Village, a judicial planning and land use multifamily residential development; awarded the City of Gainesville's es throughout FL la Seattle. Outstanding Residential Development Award. Principal Planner and/or Project cases of Washington College of Manager responsible for planning, design and permitting for the Hancock Creek • Estates and Tuscan Pointe waterfront residential subdivisions (North Fort Business featured speaker on Myers), Stuart Harbor Yacht Club (Stuart, FL), and Realmark Development's development & finance (2017). Estates at Entrada, the Tucker Grade mixed use projects. He was responsible Authored the Planning & Land Use for the planning and permitting of five interstate highway commerce centers, Certified Coastal Practitioner including the Bonita Grande CPD, the Estero Interstate Commerce Park at Credentialing Program for the Corkscrew Rd. the Stock Development's Vintage Commerce Center and Alico Coastal Zone Foundation (2018) Crossroads CPD in Lee County. Authored the 2016 NW Cape Coral Land Development, Entitlements &Project Management Sector Plan, with emphasis on economic &environmental systems Notable land development residential projects include Lennar US Homes Heritage Cove (Ft. Myers), and the Pinnacle Oaks PUD Charlotte Harbor integration. waterfront project. Commercial retail center entitlement and project Successfully defended Lee Co. in a management experience is illustrated by the Bonita Springs Home Depot $74MM inverse land use Center, a 240,000 SF retail center, Miromar Factory Shops, a 700,000 SF condemnation case (RCH v. Lee, regional outlet mall, the Estero Greens/Sam Galloway Dealership, a 229,000 2011), SF. commercial shopping center (1996), and Sierra Meadows, a 300 unit, Co-authored the Greater Pine 260,000 commercial SF Naples mixed use activity center. He directed various Island Community Plan and environmental permitting tasks, including the Bonita Grande CPD Kehl Canal awarded the 2016 FPZA Award for Flow Way restoration and enhancement, Key West YCOA riparian rights Outstanding Environmental transfer and mangrove conservation and North Trail RV Resort. He was co- Plan/Study. project manager and responsible for redesigning and amending the Timberland and Tiburon DRI, the Parker Lakes DRI, and environmental permitting for the As the Senior Principal for Eagle Tamalico Center, a 600,000 sq. ft. commercial -industrial DRI. He was Realty of SW FL, directed, planned responsible for numerous rezoning and comprehensive plan amendments, and entitled a $365MM real estate including the Summerlin Park CPD and the Casa Del Mar RPD. He was land portfolio (1999 - 2008), responsible for obtaining a precedent setting park impact fee reduction for the Effectively co -directed a $226MM 235-acre Parker Lakes, saving the client over $250,000 in development three marina resort redevelopment exactions. Throughout these project's Mr. Stuart was responsible agent project (YCOA Tampa, Naples and representation and public communications and negotiations with environmental Key West; 2005 =2008). organizations and civic and neighborhood associations. Responsible for the planning and Professional Planning Expert and Testimony design for over 500 site plans, He is a recognized authority on growth management, land use planning and urban designs and master urban design; selected as the featured speaker (National Conference on Growth development plans, including the Management, San Diego ASCE; Un. Of Washington College of Business & Real award winning Treehouse Village Estate), extensively quoted press and electronic media throughout Southwest (1986), Florida and a ten-year former County Planning Commissioner. Mr. Stuart has Planning, permitting and project been the lead expert land use planning witness in over 120 judicial and quasi- management for 6 Lee County, FL judicial, with successful testimony in a variety of cases such as the RCH v. Lee interstate interchange commercial Co., a $74MM inverse condemnation mine case, Kline v. Fort Myers Beach centers (1995 - 2005). substantive due process case, the City of Redmond v. Union Shares inverse Designed, planned, entitled and condemnation case, the Estero Group v. Lee inverse condemnation mine case, • the Suwannee River Camp Resort Chapter 120 Administrative Appeal, Lee obtained the first and only Co. v. Dahlke a Chapter 120 FLUM Amendment Appeal, the Three Oaks Development of Regional Impact Parkway v. Corlico ROW condemnation case, Caribbean Beach Club v. approval along the Suwannee Allstate Insurance coastal reconstruction build back settlement and Flanagan River (Suwannee Trails Camp v. FL DEP coastal construction line variance administrative hearing case. Resort 1985-1887). 4 Greg Stuart, MUP -- Expert Planning Judicial & Quasi judicial Testimony Case List • 725 Azalea v. City of Vero Beach: 2020 Case 19-5531 GM, Public Sector Defense DOAH Hearing FLUM Amendment; Vero Beach, FL. • Geo Group, Inc. v. City of Tacoma: 2019 Case 3:18-cv-05233, Private Sector Down Zoning & Takings US District Court Western District; Tacoma, WA. • Sakata Seed Corporation v. Lee Co.: 2019 Case # 19-3848GM Private Sector Plaintiff DOAH Hearing FLUM Amendment; Fort Myers, FL • Topps Center CPD: 2019 20190027, Private Sector Hotel Zoning & MCP Entitlement; Town of Fort Myers Beach, FL • Oak Villages RPD: 2019 DC12017-00010, Private Sector MF Residential Zoning Entitlement; Fort Myers, FL • The Pratt Place RPD: 2019 DC12018-00008, Private Sector Zoning Entitlement Testimony, Lee Co., FL. • The Baumgarten MPUD: 2019 PL20170000768, Private Sector Land Use Zoning Compatibility Testimony, Collier Co., FL. • Southland Lakes Investors Request For Judicial Notice: 2019 18-CA-000268, Plaintiff Injunction and Highest and Best Use Testimony, Lee Co., FL. • Lake Sammamish Mediation 2019 Plaintiff Highest and Best Use Testimony, King County, WA • Alico 254 Parcels G HY I & J MPD Amendment; 2018 DC12017-00001, Private Sector Zoning Entitlement, Lee Co., FL • Treeline 28 Commercial Park; 2018 DC12017-00011, Private Sector Zoning Entitlement, Lee Co., FL • Embers Parkway Future Land Use Map Amendment; LU17-0008, Private Sector Land Use Map Amendment Entitlement, Cape Coral, FL • Kline v Fort Myers Beach: 2017 CA 16-CA-001866, Substantive Due Process Defense of Town of Fort Myers Beach • Appeal of Official Interpretation: 2017 INTP-2017-PL-1233, Private Sector Permit Interpretation For Appellant, Collier Co., FL • Gulf Star Marina Renovation• DC12009-000611 2017 Private Sector PD Zoning, Lee Co. • Bonita Breeze CPD: PD16-31234-130S, 2017 Private Sector Zoning, the City of Bonita Springs • 21421 Widgeon Terrace: VAR16-0012 2017 Private Sector Variance; Town of Fort Myers Beach • Morris Irrevocable Family Trust vs. Pacific Coast Coal Co.. Inc.; 2016 Demand For Arbitration, Private Sector Litigation, King County, WA • The City of Redmond vs. Union Shares, LLC: 2016 #15-2-12698-9 SEA, Private Sector Condemnation Defense and Counterclaim, Redmond, WA • Mark Freeman, Richard Bennett Land Trust, Brinker Brown, & D&D Machine & Hydraulics, Inc. vs. Lee Co.; 2015 12-CA-2517 Inverse Condemnation & Bert Harris in defense of Lee Co., FL • The Commons Club Administrative Appeal of Permit Denial: 2015, REZ COM 15-20639, Private Sector Plaintiff, Lee Co., FL • Gasparilla Marine Sales CPD Rezoning: 2014, DCI 2015-00009, Private Sector Zoning, Lee Co., FL • The Restaurant Depot Rezoning; 2015, REZ 2015-00002, Quasi-judicial Private Sector Zoning, Lee Co., FL • Estero Group LTD v. Lee Co.: 2014 12-CA-1705 Inverse Condemnation & Bert Harris, Lee Co. Defense, Lee Co., FL DC12013-00008 Private Sector Quasi-judicial Zoning Appeal for the POA, Lee Co., FL • Carter -Pritchett v. Lee Co. 2014/1512-CA-002517 Floodway Inverse Condemnation &Bert Harris, Lee Co. Defense, Lee Co., FL • Bermuda Lakes RVPD; 2014, DC12014-00010, Quasi-judicial Private Sector Zoning, Lee Co. 5 • Westgate Center IPD; 2014, DC12014-00001, Quasi-judicial Private Sector Zoning, Lehigh Acres, FL • Huffmaster Easement Condemnation; 2014, Public Sector Pre -condemnation Analysis for Lee Co., FL, North Fort Myers, FL • MiromarLakes v. Grandezza; 2013, DR12013-00021 & DC12013-00008, Private Sector DRI & NOI, Estero, FL • Lee Co. v. Weimarr 09CA-5705T 2013 Condemnation, Lee Co. Plaintiff, Lee Co., FL • McGuigun v. Lee Co.; 09-CA-005689 2013, Riparian Rights and Inverse Condemnation, Lee Co. Defense, San Carlos Island, FL • Lee Co. v. McCoy; 2013, Condemnation, Lee Co. Plaintiff, Lee Co., FL 12012-00023, Private Sector CPD Amendment; Lee Co FL • RCH v. Lee County; 10-CA-002364 Inverse Condemnation & Bert Harris; 2011 Lee Co. Defense, Lee Co.. FL • Lee Countv Burnt Store Road; #06A-939, Parcel 123 ROW Condemnation; 2009/2011, Lee Co. Plaintiff, Lee Co., FL • Dahlke v. Lee County 2009, 08-CA419, Fort Myers Beach Inverse Condemnation, FL, Ch 120 Appeal, Lee Co. Defendant, Fort Myers Bch. FL • Caribbean Beach Club; 2009, 06-CA-004562 Development and Construction Private Party Litigation, Fort Myers Bch., FL • Three Oaks Parkway; 2008, 06A-939; ROW Condemnation, Lee Co. Plaintiff, Lee Co., FL • Three Oaks Parkway Corlico; 2008, 05CA-4770 2008, ROW Condemnation Lee Co. Plaintiff, Lee Co., FL • Collier County vs. Flick-Countv Barn Road Parcel 124; 2008, #60101, ROW Condemnation, Collier Co. Plaintiff, Collier Co., FL • Collier County vs. Graziani, et. al. Parcels 134, 135 and 136; 2008, #62081, ROW Condemnation, Collier Co. Plaintiff, Collier Co., FL • Alico Crossroads CPD Amendment; 2007, DCI 2008-0000, Private Sector CPD Zoning, Lee Co., FL • Tuscan Pointe RPD; 2006, DC12008-00088, Private Sector RPD Zoning, North Ft. Myers, FL FL Co.. FL 2004/05, VAR 2005-00018, Private Sector Variance and Appeal, Pine 2004/05, Private Sector Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Hendry 2004, DC12005-00063, Private Sector RPD Zoning, North Fort Myers, FL • Vintage Commerce Center CPD Amendment; 2004, DC12004-00065, Private Sector CPD Zoning, South Fort Myers, FL • Pinnacle Oaks PUD; 2004, PA-04-05-16-LS, Private Sector FLUM Amendment and PUD Zoning; Charlotte Co., FL • Kelly Carlos; 2004/2005, Lee Co., FL, Private Sector Contract Litigation Support, South Fort Myers, FL • FDOT v. Fleck Alico LLC.; 2004, Fort Myers, FL, Private Sector Interchange ROW Condemnation, Lee Co. FL • Collier Co. v. Ruth.; 2004, #41825480000, Collier Co., FL, ROW Condemnation 2004, Private Sector ROW Condemnation, Charlotte Co., FL Tucker Grade: FLUM Amendment; 2004 Commercial Map Amendment. Charlotte Residential • Fitzgerald 108-Acre Land Use Amendment; 2004, CPA2004-04, Private Sector Land Use Map & Text Amendment, Lee Co., FL, 0 • The Murdock Town Center Case 2003 Parcels 1026 931 290 167 169 206 237 308 311, Private Sector Land Condemnation, Charlotte Co., FL • Marvel CG ZOning; 2003, REZ 2003-00017, Private Sector Zoning, Fort Myers, FL, • Vanderbilt Condemnation; 2003, Collier Co., FL, ROW Condemnation Support, Collier Co., FL • Flanagan v. FDEP; 2003 #07-CA-000474, Private Sector CCL Appeal, Captiva, FL • Longgwood Villas RPD; 2002/2003, DC12002-00065, RPD Zoning and RPD Zoning Amendment, Lee Co., FL • Judd Creek; 2003, #LU03-01000027, Private Sector Annexation and Large Scale Land Use Map Amendment, Cape Coral, FL • IAD Capital Corp.: 2003, REZ2004-0001 1 , Private Sector Light Industrial Zoning, North Fort Myers, FL • Heritage Lakes Annexation and FLUM; 2003, 09-26-2003, Private Sector FLUM Large Scale Amendment and Annexation, Fort Myers, FL • City Mattress CPD; 2002, DC12003-00021, Private Sector CPD Zoning, Bonita Springs, FL • River Ranch 508; 2002, CPA-04-06, Private Large Scale Map Amendment, Hendry Co., FL • Storgard IPD; 1998/2002, Z-98-032, Private Sector IPD Zoning & Amendments, Lee Co., FL • Longwood Villas RPD: 2002, DIC2002-00065, Private Sector RPD Zoning, Lee Co., FL • Alico Crossroads CPD; 2002, DC12002-00052, Private Sector CPD Zoning, Lee Co., FL • Corkscrew Mine IPD Amendment; 2002, DC12002-00066, Private Sector IPD Mine Amendment, Lee Co., FL • Estero Pointe CPD; 2002, DC12002-00039, Private Sector RPD Zoning, Estero, FL • SR 776 47 Amendment; 2002, #0070384-000000-9, Private Sector Large Scale FLUM Amendment and CG Zoning, Charlotte Co., FL • Paradise Woods RS-1; 2002, REZ2002-00004, Private Sector Residential Zoning, Bonita Springs, FL, • Geraci vs. Lee County Port Authority; 2001, Private Sector Land Condemnation, Lee Co., FL • Hiding Park RPD; 2001, Z-96-073, Private Sector RPD Zoning and Amendments, Lee Co., FL • Winkler Reserve RPD; 2001, DCI 2002-00012, Private Sector RPD Zoning, Lee Co., FL • Renaissance Executive Center, 2001, #REZ2001-000151 SEZ2001-00017, Private Sector Zoning and Special Exception, Lee Co., FL • Bonita Beach Village CPD; 2001/1999, ADD 2001-00073, PD-99-034, Private Sector CPD Zoning and Rezoning (Home Depot), Bonita Springs, FL • T&T DRl/MPD Amendment; 2001, DC12001-00062, Private Sector DRI Amendment and RPD Rezoning, Estero, FL • Crystal Commerce Center IPD; 2001, DC12001-00039, Private Sector IPD Zoning, Fort Myers, FL, • Alico Commons CPD, 2001, DC12000-00090, Private Sector CPD Zoning, Lee Co., FL • Parker Plaza Office Park CPD; 2001, #DC12001-00048, Private Sector CPD Zoning, Fort Myers, FL • Harbor Ridge RPD; 2001, DC12001-00026, Private Sector RPD Zoning, Lee Co., FL, • Corkscrew Growers Sec. 3 RPD/CPD; 2000, DC12000-00070, Private Sector RPD Zoning, Lee Co., FL • Bonita Grande CPD; 2000/2008, ORD 08-09, Private Sector CPD Zoning and Appeal, Bonita Springs, FL, • Edison Village PUD; 2000, PUD-2000-15, Private Sector Commercial PUD Zoning, Collier Co., FL, • SR 776 58, 2000, PA-00-11-44LS, Private Sector Large Scale Commercial Map Amendment and CG Zoning, Charlotte Co., FL • Riveralace of Estero MUPD; 2000, DC12000-00064, Private Sector MUPD Zoning, Estero, FL • Storgard 1PD; 1999/1997/1995 # 95-07-258.03Z.02.01, Private Sector IPD Zoning and Amendment, Lee Co, FL • Sierra Meadows PUD; 1997/1999, PUD-94-01, Private Sector Mixed Use PUD Zoning, Collier Co., FL 7 • Estero Interstate Commerce Park CPD; 1999, #99-08-241.03Z01.01, Private Sector CPD Zoning, Estero, FI, • GM Pine Island Small Scale Map Amendment; Appeal 1999, # 99-2047GM, Private SectorFLUM Appeal & Ch. 120, Pine Island, FL • Springs Plaza Mini -warehouse SE; 1995/99, 95-01-031.01 S 01.01, Private Sector Special Exception, Bonita Springs, FL, • Airport Autopark CPD; 1999, # 99-04-324.03Z 01.01, Private Sector CPD Zoning, Lee Co., FL • Massey Building CPD; 1999, Private Sector Minor CPD Zoning, Lee Co., FL • The P. R, C & M PUD; 1999, # 99-07, Private Sector PUD Zoning, Collier Co., FL • The Shores at Gulf Harbour DRI Amendment; 1999, Private Sector DRI#12-8182-21, Lee Co., FL Bonita Gateway CPD1998#99-10-093.03Z 01.01Private Sector CPD ZoningBonita • , , Springs, FL • Vintage Commerce Center CPD, 1998, # 99-06-355.03Z, Private Sector CPD Zoning, Lee Co., FL Kristen Woods RPD/CPD, 1998, # 98-08-067.03Z 01.01, Private Sector R Estero, FL �onmg, • Corkscrew Palms CPD; 1997, #97-08-132.03Z 01.01, Private Sector CPD Zoning, Estero, FL • Flordeco IPD; 1997, #97-05-181.03Z 01.01, Private Sector IPD Zoning, North Fort Myers, FL • Florida Rock IPD; 1996, Private Sector IPD Amendment, Lee Co., FL • Keith Miller Old US 41 Condemnation; 1997, Private Sector ROW Condemnation, Lee Co., FL • Eagle Stringfellow Amendment, 1998, PAM 98-01, Private Sector FLUM Amendment, Pine Island, FL • Estero Greens CPD; 1997, 97-04-065-03Z, Private Sector CPD Zoning, Estero, FL • The Plaza LLC vs. Lee County; 1996, Private Sector Colonial Prky. ROW Condemnation, Fort Myers, FL • Carissa CPD; 1996, #9&12-014.03Z 01.01, Private Sector CPD Zoning, Lee Co., FL • Heritage Cove RPD; 1996, #98-02-064.03Z, Private Sector RPD Zoning, Lee Co., FL • Char -Lee Mine PD, 1995, Private Sector PUD Mine Zoning, Charlotte Co., FL, • The Palmetto Point Property Owners Ass. Vs. Lee Co; 1995, Private Sector ROW Condemnation, Lee Co., FL • Lee Co. vs. The State Of Florida DCA; 1995, Public Sector FL Administrative Appeal, Lee Co., FL • T&T DRI AmendmenbMiromar Outlet Mall CPD; 1994/95, Private Sector DRI Amendment and CPD Zonina, Estero. FL. • Casa Del Mar RPD; 1992, Private Sector RPD Zoning, Lee Co., FL • Florida Rock Sand Mine; 1991, Private Sector, Ag. SE Zoning, Glades Co. • Tamalico Center. 1991, Private Sector Commercial DRI Amendment, Lee • Summerlin Park CPD; 1991, Private Sector CPD Zoning, Lee Co., FL • Timberland and Tiburon; 1991/1992, Private Sector Mixed Use DRI Amendment and RPD/CPD Zoning, Estero, FL • The Old St. Augustine Road ROW Condemnation, 1989, Private Sector ROW Condemnation, Duval Co., FL • North Florida Regional Medical Center, 1987/1989, DRI Amendment, CON & Zoning, Gainesville, FL • Suwannee Trails Camp Resort LLC vs. DCA, 1988, Private Sector Ch, 120 Administrative Appeal, Hamilton Co., FL • Suwannee Trails Cam Resort DRI, 1986/1987, Private Sector DRI & Zoning, Hamilton Co., FL 1987, Private Sector DRI &Chapter 120 Appeal, Lake Co., FL • Treehouse Village PD, 1986, Private Sector MF Residential PUD, Gainesville, FL Greg Stuart, MAURP -Representative Real Estate Analysis and Underwriting 2009 to 2017 2017: East Las Olas: $1.75MM Syndication 2011: Hospitality Fund; $75MM Specialized Opportunity Fund 2011: Mercy Hospital Lakes Campus, Des Moines, Iowa; financing 2011: Hospitality Specialists Bundled Portfolio. Grand Rapids, MI; partnership buyout 2011: Port Labelle Sports Car Club. Hendry Co., FL; real estate workout and development 2011: Willow Gate Trails Subdivision, South Bend. IN: real estate workout and development 2011: Swaney Napes Hotels, Naples, FL 2011: East gate Commerce Park, Fort Mvers, FL: $2.7MM refinancina 2010: Seven Bundled Residential Development Projects, Auburn Hills, MI and Canton, MI; 386 SF lots, $4.86MM Offering 2010: Fort 2010: Oak Station Retail Center, Marianna, FL; 175,000 SF $6.95MM Shopping Center Offering 2010: Gulf Coast Health Park, Fort Myers, FL 2010: Kings Highway Packing House, Arcadia, FL 2010: Windsor Way Apartments, Naples, FL 2010: West Cypress The Learning Center, Estero, FL 2010: Treeline Preserve Retail Center, Fort Myers, FL 2010: The Vines Highway Commercial Parcel, Fort Myers, FL 2010: Sunset Point Resort, Bocas Del Torro, Panama 2010: Sunbelt Warehouse. Fort Mvers. FL 2010: University Parkway Medical Tract, Sarasota, FL 2010: Grandezza_Golf Course, Estero, FL 2010: Sanorini Mixed Use Development, Estero, FL 2010: Punta Loros Resort TractCosta Rica , 2010: Oakwood Apartments, Jacksonville, FL 2010: Hilton Garden Inn, Plymouth, MI 2010: HFS Medical Office Fund, $20MM Specialized Fund 2010: Eastlinks Flex Space, Fort Myers, FL 2010: Dykes Everett Mine, Orange Co., FL 2009: Walker Club Apartments, Vero Beach, FL 2009: Sterling Crest Apartments, Orlando, FL 2009: Sandpiper Cover Apartments, Boynton Beach, FL 2009: Lynn Mann 8.6 Commercial Tract, Fort Myers, FL 2009: Casey Key Marina, Sarasota, FL 2009: Brookside Marina, Naples, FL 2009: Bonita Exchange Interstate Commerce Park, Bonita Springs, FL 2009: Black Bear Residential, Naples, FL Greg Stuart, MAURP - Real Estate Analysis, Acquisition, Development and Dispensation Project List 2010 — 2012: Gulf Coast Health Park; $22MM Specialty Institutional Mixed Use Development Project, Lee Co, FL. Investment Plan Development, Analysis, Entitlements and Implementation. 2004 — 08: Bayshore Interstate 41; $10AMM Interstate Commerce Development Project, Lee Co., FL. Acquisition, Debt and Equity Raise, Syndication, Underwriting, Project Management, Entitlements and Brokerage. 2005-08: YCOA; $236MM Three Marina Development Project; capitalization For 3 Tampa, Naples and Key West, FL. Marinas; Debt and Equity Raise, Project Management, Oversight and Direction For Principal Partner, 2003-2007: Burnt Store Lakes: $20.1MM Acreage Assembly Residential Development Project; Cape Coral, FL. Project Analysis, Underwriting, Syndication, Marketing & Brokerage. 20040,,2007: Pinecreek Ranch; $94MM Land Investment Project, Charlotte Co., FL. Acquisition, Debt and Equity Raise, Syndication, Underwriting and Project Management, 2002-2005: Colonial Interstate 175; $23.7MM Land Investment Project, Lee Co., FL. Acquisition, Debt and Equity Raise, Syndication, Underwriting, Project Management, Entitlements and Brokerage. 2001-2004: Judd Creek; $8.9MM Mixed Use Investment Project, North Fort Myers, FL. Underwriting and Feasibility, Acquisition, Equity Raise, Entitlement, Project Management and Brokerage. 2001-2006: Hendry Co. River Ranch; $17.8MM Land Investment and Development Project, Hendry Co., FL. Acquisition, Debt and Equity Raise, Syndication, Underwriting, Project Management, Entitlements and Brokerage. 2002 -2004: Telegraph Creek Ranch; $10MM Investment Project, Hendry Co., FL. Underwriting and Feasibility, Acquison, Equity Raise, Entitlement, Project Management and Brokerage. 2000-2005: The Charlotte 58 Activity Center. Port Charlotte, FL. $13.2MM Acquisition, Debt and Equity Raise, Underwriting, Project Management, Entitlements and Brokerage, 2002-2006: Hancock Creek Commerce Park; $22MM Investment Project, Cape Coral, FL. Underwriting and Feasibility, Acquisition, Equity and Equity Raise, Entitlement, Project Management and Brokerage Dispensation. 1997-2008: Pinnacle Oaks; $12MM Residential Development Investment Project, Charlotte Co., FL. Entitlement and Project Management, 2000-2007: South Gulf Cove Residential; $30MM Waterfront Lots and Mixed Acreage Investment Project, Charlotte Co., FL. Acquisition, Equity Raise, Entitlement, Project Management and Brokerage 2001-2007: South Gulf Cove Commercial; $15MM 58 acre Commercial Acreage Investment Project, Charlotte Co., FL. Underwriting and Feasibility, Acquisition, Equity Raise, Entitlement, Entitlement/Project Management and Brokerage Dispensation, 1998-2003: Kelly Carlos; $17MM Land Investment Project, Lee Co., FL. Entitlement, Project Management and Brokerage Dispensation, 1997- 2005: Bonita Grande: $12.5MM Land Investment Project, Bonita Springs, FL. Acquisition, Equity Raise, Entitlement and Project Management. Exhibit Two _The One Naples Site Highest & Best Use CASE _THE ONE NAPLES GMP MAP AMENDMENT, MUPD REZONING &STREET VACATION Page 1 of 4 Primary Trade Area D Z BG 3 *' A CT102.09 0 r, BG 1 CT102.09 BG 3 CT102.15 BG 4 CT101410 Nap'- �� BG 2 MOM, BG 3 CT101209 BG 2 CT102.15 BG 1 CT101009 BG 4 CT102.08 BG 1 CT102.08 The One Naples C-3 Primary Market Area For Retail Goods & Services _ 3,933 Households Page 2 of 4 Medium HH North Naples Census tracts Persons HH Income Block Group i CT 102.09 672 353 ;1 133,977.00 Gulf Shore Drive N. Of VBR Block Group 3 CT 101.09 1171 412 48,690.00 Naples Park (south) Block Group 3 CT 102.09 688 328 160,917.00 Naples Park (west) Black Group 3 CT 102.15 1282 723 250,001.00 Pelican Bay (west) Black Group 1 CT 102.08 492 280 140,942.00 Pelican Bay (oast & south to Pelican Bay Blvd) Block Group 2 CT 102.15 549 279 191,875.00 Pelican Bay (south) Block Group 4 CT 102.05 774 443 $ 102,269.00 Pelican Bay (oast ME US 41) Block Group 1 CT 101.09 423 235 $ 990250.00 East & North VBR ME Black Group 4 CT 1.01A0 1165 547 70f885.00 NE Naples Park Black Group 2 CT 1.01.09 709 333 63,869.00 Naples Park SE TOTAL 7925 3933 AVERAGE 126 267.50 So urce: American Community purvey,„ 5 Yr. Est. Highest and Best Use IS THE SITE PHYSICALLY VIABLE; I.E., CAN THE SITE SUSTAIN THE DEVELOPMENT? FROM A REGULATORY FRAMEWORK, IS THE PROJECT REALISTICALLY FEASIBLE? IS THERE, AND/OR, WILL THERE BE A REALISTIC MARKET FOR THE PROJECT THAT OPTIMIZES INVESTMENT VALUE? Page 3 of 4 (AI Applicant's Evidence For The 100,000 SF Alt. Commercial Development Plan A. Will The County Vacate $4.3MM Street ROW For This Doubtful R. Is There A Market For 2nd FL, 3rd FL, 4th FL & 5th FL Retail _ No C. Is There A Market For 39,000 SF of Restaurant's _ Doubtful D. Does The 4.63 ac. +/- Site Incorporate Min, 309/0 Open Space (1.38 ac.) No E. Does This Plan Incorporate Required Setbacks, Parking & Drainage _ Doubtful F. Does The Applicant's Plan Illustrate Feasible C-3 Uses No Findings 1. FOR THE ONE NAPLES TIS MODELED 39,000 SF RESTAURANT AND 61,000 SF RETAIL, A 100,000 SF COMMERCIAL PROJECT IS NOT THE HIGHEST AND BEST USE OF THE SITE, IT WILL NEVER BE BUILT; CONSEQUENTLY THE APPLICANT'S DATA AND ANALYSIS IS QUESTIONABLE, 2. CONTEMPORARY CENTERS SUCH AS AND INCLUDING A TRADITIONAL NEIGHBORHOOD SHOPPING CENTER W./1 ANCHOR, A COMMUNITY CENTER W./1 TO 2 ANCHORS, A THEME/ FESTIVAL PROJECT, AND A LIFE STYLE CENTER, DO NOT FIT THE SITE'S REGULATORY FRAMEWORK, PHYSICAL SITE CARRYING CAPACITY AND MARKET FIT, 3. ESTIMATED TRAFFIC IMPACTS AND AN ACCURATE UNDERSTANDING OF THE MUPD'S TRANSPORTATION PUBLIC BENEFITS HAVE YET TO BE ESTABLISHED. Page 4 of 4 S I UAK I ANDASSOCIATES Planning & Design Services Exhibit Three The Adjacent Neighborhood Density, Building Height & Setbacks Exhibit For Neighborhood Complementary and Compatibility Analysis CASE _THE ONE NAPLES GMP MAP AMENDMENT, MUPD REZONING &STREET VACATION Page 1 of 7 S I UAH I ANDASSOCIATES Planning & Design Services Adjacent Neighborhood Study Area FINDING _Bay Colony/Pelican Bay Is A Functionally &Perceptually Distinct Neighborhood That Offers Little In Accurate Analysis 1 Gated Private and Semi -private Resort Access & Circulation _ South Gulf Shore Dr. Neighborhood Non -gated, Public Rd. Access & Circulation. 2 Large Scale DRI w./Unified Control and Community Associations _ Independent South Gulf Shore Dr. Neighborhood Projects. 3 A DRI Development Order and PUD Zoning _ Independent South Gulf Shore Dr. Conventional C-3, RT, RSF-3, RMF-6 & RMF-16 Zoning. 4 Large Parcel Urban Form w./Curvilinear Streets _ South Gulf Shore Dr. Vanderbilt Bch. Rd. Small Parcel Urban Form w./Straight Streets. 5 The Vanderbilt Beach Rd. Edge _ Limited Pedestrian Linkage From Site To Trieste/Pelican Bay; Arterial Road Separation. Page 2 of 7 STUARTANDASSOCIATES Planning & Design Services Adjacent Communities Year Built # Units Site Area Density Building Ht Stories Frontyard Setback A _ Beachmoor 1981 33 1.7 ac 19.0 per ac 12 67.0 ft B _ Phonecian Sands 1991 10 0.7 ac 15.3 per ac 6 25.0 ft C _ Vanderbil The A Condo 9235 Gulf Shore Dr. 2005 19 1.3 ac 14.4 per ac 12 26.0 ft D _ Vanderbilt Bch & Harbour Club 9318 Gulf Shore Dr 1982 44 2.1 ac 21.2 per ac 6 80.0 ft E _ Seawatch Condo 9375 Gulf Shore Dr 1981 26 2.1 ac 12.5 per ac 8 45.0 ft F _ Vanderbilt Bch Motel Condo 1st Add 9256 Gulf Shore 1990 16 1.1 ac 14.5 per ac 4 62.5 ft G _ The Watermark Condo 9380 Gulf Shore 1991 22 1.4 ac 16.0 per ac 5 41.0 ft H _Vanderbilt Palms 1985 28 0.5 ac 52.8 per ac 3 2040 ft I _ Barefoot Pelican 1984 60 1.3 ac 45.8 per ac 5 35.0 ft I _ Vanderbilt Hideaway 377 Vanderbilt Bch Rd 1984 15 0.3 ac 53.6 per ac 4 17.0 ft K _ Regatta 2000 205 9.1 ac 22.5 per ac 12 & 6 150.0 ft L _ Chateau 9101 Vanderbilt Dr 1990 16 1.0 ac 16.5 per ac 2 20.0 ft AVERAGE DENSITY with H & I OUTIER PARCELS 25.3 per ac AVERAGE DENSITY W./OUT OUTLIER PARCELS 19.8 per ac AVERAGE DENSITY W./3 OUTLIER PARCELS & TRIESTE 25.1 per ac .E:3�IilljillT�:E71 [Ly41�9 BUILDING HEIGHT W./OUT OUTLIER AVERAGE BUILDING HEIGHT W./3 OUTLIER PARCELS & 6.4 Stories 7.4 Stories 7.5 AVERAGE FRONTYARD SETBACK 49.0 ft NOTE _Outlier Parcel Data For Statistical Analysis Denoted In Red Text NOTE _Trieste Is Within The Bay Colony Club Community Association &Enjoys Pelican Bay PUD Common Open Space Building Frontyard Other Nearby Communities 8r Buildings #Units Site Area Density Ht Stories Setback Beachwalk Gardens _ SF Patio Homes 2 The Trieste 105 4.74 ac 22.2 per ac 20 120 ft The Ritz Parking Garage 3 58 ft Connor Vanderbilt Beach Estates SF 1 & 2 Page 3 of 7 STUARTANDASSOCIATES Planning & Design Services Adjacent Neighborhood Densities Adjacent Communities Year Built #Units Area Density A _ Beachmoor 1981 33 1.7 ac 19.0 per ac B _ Phonecian Sands 1991 10 0,7 ac 15.3 per ac C _ Vanderbil The A Condo 9235 Gulf Shore Dr. 2005 19 1,3 ac 14.4 per ac D ._ Vanderbilt Bch & Harbour Club 9318 Gulf Shore Dr 1982 44 2,1 ac 21.2 per ac E _ Seawatch Condo 9375 Gulf Shore Dr 1981 26 2,1 ac 12.5 per ac F _ Vanderbilt Bch Motel Condo 1st Add 9256 Gulf Shore 1990 16 1.1 ac 14.5 per ac G _ The Watermark Condo 9380 Gulf Shore 1991 22 1.4 ac 16.0 per ac H _Vanderbilt Palms 1985 28 0,5 ac 52,8 per ac I _ Barefoot Pelican 1984 60 1.3 ac 45,8 per ac J _ Vanderbilt Hideaway 377 Vanderbilt Bch Rd 1984 15 03 ac 516 per ac K _ Regatta 2000 205 9.1 ac 22.5 per ac L _ Chateau 9101 Vanderbilt Dr 1990 16 1.0 ac 16.5 per ac AVERAGE DENSITY with H & J OUTIER PARCELS 25.3 per ac AVERAGE DENSITY W./OUT OUTLIER PARCELS 19.8 par ac AVtKACit UtNSI I Y W./3 UU I LItR PARCELS & TRIESTE 25.1 per ac Page 4 of 7 STUARTANDASSOCIATES Planning & Design Services Adjacent Neighborhood Building Heights Site Building Adjacent Communities Year Built # Units Area Fit Stories A _ Beachmoor 1981 33 1.7 ac 12 B _ Phonecian Sands 1991 10 0.7 ac 6 C _ Vanderbil The A Condo 9235 Gulf Shore Dr. 2005 19 1.3 ac 12 D _ Vanderbilt Bch & Harbour Club 9318 Gulf Shore Dr 1982 44 2.1 ac 6 E _ Seawatch Condo 9375 Gulf Shore Dr 1981 26 2.1 ac 8 F _ Vanderbilt Bch Motel Condo 1st Add 9256 Gulf Shore 1990 16 1.1 ac 4 G _ The Watermark Condo 9380 Gulf Shore 1991 22 1.4 ac 5 H _Vanderbilt Palms 1985 28 0.5 ac 3 I _ Barefoot Pelican 1984 60 1.3 ac 5 J _ Vanderbilt Hideaway 377 Vanderbilt Bch Rd 1984 15 0.3 ac 4 K _ Regatta 2000 205 9.1 ac 12 & 6 L _ Chateau 9101 Vanderbilt Dr 1990 16 1.0 ac 2 AVERAGE AVERAGE BUILDING BUILDING HEIGHT HEIGHT with H & J OUTLIER PARCELS W./OUT OUTLIER PARCELS 6.4 7.4 AVERAGE BUILDING HEIGHT W./3 OUTLIER PARCELS & TRIESTE 7.5 Page 5 of 7 STUARTANDASSOCIATES Planning & Design Services Adjacent Neighborhood Front -yard Setbacks acent Communities A _ Beachmoor B Phonecian Sands C Vanderbil The A Condo 9235 Gulf Shore Dr. D _ Vanderbilt Bch & Harbour Club 9318 Gulf Shore Dr E _ Seawatch Condo 9375 Gulf Shore Dr F Vanderbilt Bch Motel Condo 1st Add 9256 Gulf Shore G _ The Watermark Condo 9380 Gulf Shore H Vanderbilt Palms I Barefoot Pelican J _ Vanderbilt Hideaway 377 Vanderbilt Bch Rd K _ Regatta L Chateau 9101 Vanderbilt Dr Frontyard Setback 67.0 25.0 26.0 80.0 45.0 62.5 41.0 20.0 35.0 17.0 150.0 �n_n AVERAGE FRONTYARD SETBACK 59.1 Page 6 of 7 S I UAK I ANDASSOCIATES Planning & Design Services 8 Sk�ry Mid -ripe B7-fl d_ 4 46-ft - Par n Garage F 7O4 LF *loomirllhl1l 2 20"* t ;.. us Flom Tow" k too oft- 6 wry Midowrise oo Page 7 of 7 STUARTANDASSOCIATES Planning & Design Services Exhibit Four A Complementary and Compatibility Assessment Between Site C-3 Zoning and Proposed MUPD CASE _THE ONE NAPLES GMP MAP AMENDMENT, MUPD REZONING &STREET VACATION Page 1 of 3 S I UARTANDASSOCIATES Planning & Design Services The Zoning District Compatibility & Intensity Assessment _ C-3 Grants Greater Complementary, Compatible and Less Intensive Development When Compared To One Naples THE APPLICANT PUTS FORWARD A JUSTIFICATION THAT RESULTING DEVELOPMENT IMPACTS, FORM AND INTENSITY UNDER THE EXISTING C-3 WILL BE WORSE FOR THE NEIGHBORHOOD THAN THE ONE NAPLES PROJECT, THIS ASSERTION IS FALSE FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS: 1. C-3 zoning is to support neighborhood commercial uses and activities; it permits neighborhood business, professional and personal services and small scale retail uses. Large retail uses greater than 5,000 sf are not permitted; no big Box Retail, Walmart, etc. 2. The Applicant's justification assumes the site can support a 100,000 sf retail center. This assumption is in error in that a 100,000 sf retail center is not the site's highest and best use. 3. The Applicant's justification assumes the site can support 31,000 sf of restaurant and 69,000 sf of retail, equal to 100,000 sf/42% site coverage. A more accurate and feasible 22% commercial use site coverage yields 52,000 sf, which is a compatible and normal neighborhood commercial center. 4. C-3 does not permit wholesale retail types of uses, does not permit outdoor storage, equipment and merchandise, and does not permit Hotels. 5. C-3 Neighborhood Commercial provides for local neighborhood goods and services and thus is compatible with the surrounding neighborhoods. Local neighborhood goods and services serve to reduce vehicular trips and trip length for US 41 goods and services. One Naples does not provide meaningful type and mixture of neighborhood oriented goods; it will add to VBR and GSD traffic congestion because of the rezoning. No Hotel traffic impact analysis has been provided by the Applicant. 6. C-3 Business Commercial development may effectively disperse traffic via the Gulf Shore Ct./Southbay Dr./Vanderbilt Beach Rd/Gulf Shore Dr. Street grid with a 565- ft. Gulf Shore Ct./Southbay Drive intersection separation and no east bound left - out turning movements aligned with the parking garage. Page 2 of 3 S I UARTANDASSOCIATES Planning & Design Services • One Naples reduces safe intersection connection separation by 215-ft (from 565-ft to 350-ft.), while creating a new conflicting, east bound left -out aligned with the parking garage. residential mixed use requires human scale pedestrian environment (see 4.02.38 Specific Design Criteria). C-3 requires: • A 21-ft wide pedestrian pathway with street furnishings and street plantings; The Applicant is requesting an 8-ft multi -use path with no street furnishings; • C-3 Mixed Use requires enhanced parking lot plantings, enhanced building foundation plantings and building architectural standards; 31F The Applicant has not provided building architectural elevations and measurable designs, and has not provided detailed planting material information for building foundation landscaping. 8. C-3 Setbacks for the One Naples project are 25-ft parking garage and 104-ft for the two towers; these setbacks serve to reduce project intensity appearance and support neighborhood compatibility. • One Naples setbacks are 15-ft parking garage, 25-ft for the two towers and a 12.1-ft/zero-ft waterfront setback. These setbacks increase project intensity appearance and are completely detrimental to neighborhood compatibility. 9. C-3 provides for private and public common open space while relying on 30% open space. One Naples does not provide for public common open while relying on swimming pool rooftop open space. The MUPD does not provide legally defined and functional open space; see Exhibit 5 LDC 1.08.02 Definition of Open Space as "Areas that are not occupied by buildings" Page 3 of 3 S WARTANDASSOCIATES Planning & Design Services Exhibit Five Regulatory Framework & Key Collier County Rules For Approval CASE _THE ONE NAPLES GMP MAP AMENDMENT, MUPD REZONING &STREET VACATION Page 1 of 8 STUARTANDASSOCIATES Planning & Design Services 1. Key Collier Co. Growth Management Plan RUles: Land Use Policy 5.6: New developments shall be compatible withx complementary to, the surrounding land uses, as set forth in the Land Development Code. • Comment_ One Naples Does Is Not Designed To Fit Into and Be ComplementaryTo The Neighborhood. Land Use Objective 7: Promote smart growth policies, reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and adhere to the existing development character of the Collier County, where applicable, and as follows: Land Use Policy 7.4: The County shall encourage new developments to provide walkable communities with a blend of densities, common open spaces civic facilities and a range of housing prices and types. • Comment _One Naples Does Not Have Function Public Common Open Space & A Blend Of Densities Transportation Objective 7: Develop and adopt standards for safe and efficient ingress and egress to adjoiIII g Mir operties, and encourage safe and convenient on -site traffic circulation through the development review process. • Comment _One Naples Decreases Vehicular Safety By Creating A New 4-Leg Turning Movement Intersection While Reducing Intersection Separation Spacing. Coastal Management Policy 12.1.2: Land use plan amendments in the Category 1 hurricane vulnerability zone shall only be considered if such increases in densities provide appropriate mitigation to reduce the impacts of hurricane evacuation times. • Comment One Naples Does Not Provide Hurricane Evacuation Time Mitigation; It Provides 170 Cots and ATrailer. Page 2 of 8 S I UARTANDASSOCIATES Planning & Design Services 2. Key Land Development Code Density Rules: 4.07.02.B -Design Requirements _External Relationships 1. Development within a PUD district shall be compatible with established or planned uses of surrounding neighborhoods and property. 2. The PUD shall provide protection of the development from potentially adverse surrounding influences and Protection of the surrounding area from potentially adverse influences generated by or within the PUD. Fences, walls, or vegetative screening at the boundaries of PUD districts shall be provided, at a minimum, in accordance with the landscaping/ buffering requirements of section 4.06.00 to protect residents from undesirable views, lighting, noise, or other adverse off -site influences, or to protect. • Comment _One Naples 2X's Height, 2X's Density, 70% to 100% Reduction In Setbacks & No Functional Open Space Is Not Compatible With The Adjacent Neighborhood. 4.07.02.8 -Design Requirements _Residential Density 3. The BCC may lessen density or intensity of development when it has been determined that development to the maximum density or intensity permissible in this section would: a. Create inconvenient or unsafe access to the PUD; or b. Create traffic congestion in the streets which adjoin or lead to the PUD, or c. Place a burden on parks, recreational areas, schools, and other facilities which serve or are proposed to serve the PUD; or d. Be in conflict with the intent or provisions of the GMP; or e. Create a threat to property or incur abnormal public expense in areas subject to natural hazards; or f. Be incompatible or inconsistent with surrounding neighborhoods or areas, g. Otherwise be inappropriate. • Comment _One Naples Decreases Vehicular Safety By Creating A New 4-Leg Turning Movement Intersection While Reducing Intersection Separation Spacing. • Comment _One Naples 2X's Height, 2X's Density, 70% to 100% Reduction In Setbacks & No Functional Open Space Is Not Compatible With The Adjacent Neighborhood, Page 3 of 8 S I UARTANDASSOCIATES Planning & Design Services 3. Key LDC Definitions: LDC 1.08.02 Definitions _Open space: Areas that are not occupied by buildings, impervious parking areas, streets, driveways or loading areas and which may be equipped or developed with amenities designed to encourage the use and enjoyment of the space either privately or by the general public. Examples of open space include: areas of preserved indigenous native vegetation, areas replanted with vegetation after construction; lawns, landscaped areas and greenways; outdoor recreational facilities; and plazas, atriums, courtyards and other similar public spaces. • Comment _One Naples Private Recreational Rooftop Open Space Occupies The Top Of The Building & Does Not Meet Open Space Definition. LDC 1.08.02 Definitions _Open space, common: Those areas within or related to a development, not in individually owned lots, designed and intended to be accessible to, and for the common use or enjoyment of, the residents of the development, or the general public. • Comment_ Project Lacks Functional Common Open Space For The Public Which Impacts Neighborhood Compatibility, LDC 1.08.02 Definitions _Compatibility: A condition in which land uses or conditions can coexist in relative proximity to each other in a stable fashion over time such that no use or condition is unduly negatively impacted directly or indirectly by another use or condition. • Comment_ One Naples 2X's Height, 2X's Density, 700/to 100% Reduction In Setbacks & No Functional Open Space Is Not Compatible With The Adjacent Neighborhood While Creating Long-term Neighborhood Instability By Providing A High Density "Template" and Precedent For Possibly Up To 13 Different Gulf Shore Dr. Redevelopment Sites, Merriam -Webster Definition _Complementary: Mutually supporting each others lack; as in the complementary relationship that binds the two. • Comment _One Naples Miami Beach -like Coastal Urban Form Is Not Complementary to The Neighborhood's SW FL Naples Suburban Coastal Form. S I UARTANDASSOCIATES Planning & Design Services LDC 1.08.02 Definitions _ Compatibility review: A review pursuant to the Architectural and Site Design Standards contained within section 5.05.08 of the Land Development Code (LDC) in effect at the time SBR Letters of Compliance are requested and that pertains to issues of compatibility with surrounding uses, complimentary patterns of development and mitigation of negative impacts. The Compatibility Review will be limited to compatibility issues, external sidewalks and pathway connections, lighting, dumpster location and screening, and orientation of buildings and ancillary facilities. • Comment _One Naples 2X's Height, 2X's Density, 70% to 100% Reduction In Setbacks & No Functional Open Space Is Not Compatible With The Adjacent Neighborhood & Should Not Advance To The Final Site Plan Approval stage. LDC 1.08.02 Definitions _Pedestrian pathway: The area between the Road Rights -of --Way and the building within the Commercial Mixed Use Project and the Residential Mixed Use PUD Project. The Pedestrian pathway shall include: street furnishings; a street tree planting zone, and a pedestrian travel zone, and shall be a minimum of 21 feet in width. • Comment _One Naples 15-ft Setback &Pathway Does Not Meet Min. Code Standard, Page 5 of 8 STUARTANDASSOCIATES Planning & Design Services 4. 2.03.06 PUD Purpose & Intent: Galllc�r Cnunly, rL Lantl beveiopmenl Code Rl A/7,0, 17:49 Ard 2.03,OG -Planned Unit Development Districts A, Purpose and intent The purpose and Intent of establishing the planned unit development district (PUD) is to provide procedures and standards to encourage mixed use planned developments that may be situated at appropriate locations, or planned developments that may or may not be mixed use in the urban fringe areas, all in accordance with the planning and development objectives of the county under the LDC and the GMP. it is further the purpose and intent of these PUD regulations to encourage ingenuity, innovation and imagination in the planning, design, and development or redevelopment of relatively large tracts of land under unified or control. PUDs produced in compliance with the terms and provisions of this LDC and the GMP depart from the strict application of setback, height, and minimum lot requirements of conventional zoning districts while maintaining minimum standards by which flexibility may be accomplished, and while protecting the public interest, in order to: B, The PUD process is intended to accomplish the following: 1. Provide a creative approach to Improve the quality of the built environment of contiguous tracts. of land 2. Create a more desirable environment providing for consistency and visual harmony than would be possible through strict application of the minimum requirements of this LDC. 3. Encourage patterns of land use that support economical provisions of infrastructure, resulting in smaller networks of utilities and streets wlttr consequent lower construction and future maintenance costs. 4. Evaluate the impact of a particular PUD on the present and projected population, economy, land use pattern, tax base, street system, and public facility networks) of the county relative to the various costs and benefits associated with such development. 5. Assure that the development employs techniques (eatur}ng amenities and excellence in the form of variations in siting mixed land uses and/or varied dwelling types, as well as adaptation to and conservation of the topography and other natural characteristics of the land involved. Exceptions to variations in siting, mixed land uses and/or varied dwelling types may be granted an PUD infill development. C. PUD districts shall hereafter be established by amendment of the official zoning atlas according to the procedures established in LDC section 10.02.08 and the Administrative Code. The purpose and intent of establishing and identifying the following classifications is to identify a relationship between a proposed PUD district and the uses permitted within a PUD to defined zoning districts within this LDC and to establish appropriate uses and performance standards within this PUD, which are similar to those allowed by the most similar district(s). PUDs shall hereafter be defined by the following districts and shall be referenced as such within the PUD document as follows: Res/dential planned unit development district. This district is intended to further the general purpose of a planned unit development district set forth above as it relates to residential areas. The principal use of any residential planned unit development is for human habitation in permanent and/or seasonal year-round dvaelling units. The RPUD district shall be construed to include the following zoning districts: RSF-1, RSF 2, RSF-3, RSF-4, RSF-5, RSF-6, RMF-6, RMF-1?., RMF-16, RT, VR, AND MH. 2. tornmunity facilities planned unit development district. This district is intended to accommodate public t�ht ut:6lank (arre i 111 17 • Comment _One Naples Development Standards Are Not At All Similar To Those Allowed By Other Districts &Violate 2.03.06(c). STUARTANDASSOCIATES Planning & Design Services 5. The Regulatory Framework _ 4002038 C-3 Mixed Use Purpose & I ntent: 4.02.38 -Specific Design Criteria for Mixed Use Development within C-1 through 3-3 Zoning Districts B. Applicability. All properties zoned C-1, C-2 and C-3. These regulations shall apply to all mixed -use projects proposed within these zoning districts, subject to the design criteria set forth in this section. The design criteria address the relationship of buildings , parking, vehicular, and pedestrian movement to create a pedestrian oriented experience. Buildings are encouraged to be built close to the vehicular and pedestrian way to create a continuous active and vibrant streetscape utilizing the architecture, landscaping, lighting, signage, and street furnishings. Vehicular travel ways support two-way traffic and on street parking. A logical pedestrian pathway system is provided throughout that connects the pedestrian movements from one use to another or within use areas. Building arcades and awnings are allowed to extend over the sidewalk to create shade and encourage pedestrian activity. Signage design shall be carefully integrated with site and building design to create a unified appearance for the project. Creativity in the design of signs is encouraged in order to emphasize the unique character of the project. Projects utilizing these design criteria will be developed in compliance with the LDC, except as specified herein. • Comment _One Naples 15-ft Setback, Building Height and Pathway Does Not Meet Min. PUD & C-3 Mixed Use Standards. 6. Foundational Growth Management Plan Principles: Collier Co. Growth Management Plan Underlying Concepts _Management of Coastal Development (VII) Extensive populated areas in Collier County are vulnerable to periodic salt -water inundation from tropical storms or hurricanes. It is extremely important that an acceptable balance between at risk population and evacuation capability be achieved. Within the Coastal High Hazard Area maximum permissible residential density is limited in recognition of the level of risk, the existing deficiency of evacuation shelter space and existing patterns of density. • Comment _One Naples Doubles Density In Coastal High Hazard Zone. S I UARTANDASSOCIATES Planning & Design Services Collier Co. Growth Management Plan Underlying Concepts _ Attainment of High Quality Urban Design While the Growth Management Plan as a whole provides the requisite foundation for superior urban design through a sound framework for growth (protection of natural resources, thoughtful guidance of land uses, adequate public facilities and adequate housing), the Future Land Use Element provides several additional measures. Collier County has also adopted Design Standards for all commercial development into the Land Development Code. These Architectural and Site development standards include building design, parking lot orientation, pedestrian access, vehicular movement, landscaping and lighting. • Comment _One Naples Development Standards Are Not At All Similar To Those Allowed By Other Districts. STUARTANDASSOCIATES Planning & Design Services Exhibit Six The One Naples Collier County Growth Management Plan Internal Consistency Assessment CASE _THE ONE NAPLES GMP MAP AMENDMENT, MUPD REZONING &STREET VACATION Page 1 of 10 STUARTANDASSOCIATES Planning & Design Services FINDINGS _ The map amendment and zoning application is not consistent with 24 goals, objectives and policies of the Collier County Growth Management Plan. FUTURE LAND USE OBJECTIVE 3: Ensure protection of natural and historic resources, ensure the availability of land for utility facilities, promote compatible land uses within the airport noise zone, and to provide for management of growth in an efficient and effective manner through Land Development Regulations adopted to implement this Growth Management Plan. • RESPONSE _The One Naples development standards significantly vary from similar neighborhood zoning districts and, as such, do not provide for efficient and effective growth management. The project's 15-ft Vanderbilt Beach Road and Gulf Shore Drive (VBR and GSD) street setback effectively precludes any required future right-of-way and road expansion. Thus the development standard does not ensure the availability of land for utility facilities. The doubling of density, doubling of height, 70% to 100% reduction in setbacks, a 15-ft setback for a 1,066 linear foot +/- VBR and GSD parking garage at 40 to 45-ft tall, and the use of private rooftop recreation for common open space are standards inconsistent with LDC regulations and are not effective regulations needed to insure internal consistency. The project is not consistent with Objective 3. Policy3.2: Land Development Regulations have been adopted into the Collier County Land Development Code (LDC) that contain provisions to implement the Growth Management Plan through the development review process. These include the following provisions: F The safe and convenient flow of on -site traffic, as well as the design of vehicle parking areas, are addressed through the site design standards and site development plan requirements of the LDC, which include: access requirements from roadways, parking lot design and orientation, lighting, building design and materials, and landscaping and buffering criteria. • RESPONSE The One Naples Master Plan reduces intersection connection separation from 565-ft +/- to 350-ft +/- along VBR to Southbay Drive. This reduces driver response time and in so doing reduces safety. The One Naples Master Plan creates a new "4-leg" project Gateway aligned with the VBR parking garage and creates unsafe project east bound left -out turning movements that conflict with parking garage ingress and egress movements. The project further aggravates traffic congestion with particular emphasis on east bound VBR turning movements. The project eliminates potential available and proximate C-3 neighborhood goods and services and therefore increases eastbound US 41 trips and trip lengths to obtain neighborhood goods and services. The project requires a parking space deviation to reduce the number of required parking spaces. These facts demonstrate that the project does not advance safe and convenient flow of on -site traffic. The MUPD development standards weaken existing C-3 mixed use rules and reduces LDC efficiency and effectiveness. The application Exhibit G Streetscape Landscaping illustrates the applications lack of consistency with Objective 3 in so far as site planning, streetscape pathway design, urban design and buffering. The project's streetscape tree planting standards are the code minimum. The project's pathway Page 2 of 10 STUARTANDASSOCIATES Planning & Design Services design is 8-it and not the code required 21-ft minimum. The project fails to meet adjoining property and neighborhood compatibility standards. The project fails to meet it's entitlement request criteria under LDC Section 10.02.13.B.5. The project is not consistent with Objective 3 and 3F. Refer to the April 27, 2020 Stuart Opinion Letter and the July 15, 2020 Stuart Neighborhood Letter of Objection that are in the staff packet. Refer to Stuart Exhibit 5 Part Two Compatibility Standards and Exhibit 8 Part One The One Naples Planning Analysis. Please refer to the technical traffic impact documentation provide by William Oliver, PE. OBJECTIVE 5: Implement land use policies that promote sound planning, protect environmentally sensitive lands and habitat for listed species while protecting private property rights, ensure compatibility of land uses and further the implementation of the Future Land Use Element. • RESPONSE _The map amendment language and the planned development standards do not ensure compatibility of land uses; the request eliminates existing C-3 zoning standards and proposes development standards that are outside the community norm. The project is not consistent with Objective 5 and Policies 5.3 and 5.6. Refer to the April 27, 2020 Stuart Opinion Letter and the July 15, 2020 Stuart Neighborhood Letter of Objection that are in the staff packet. Refer to Stuart Exhibit 5 Part Two Compatibility Standards and Exhibit 8 Part One The One Naples Planning Analysis, Policy 5.3: All rezoning must be consistent with this Growth Management Plan. For properties that are zoned inconsistent with the Future Land Use Designation Description Section but have nonetheless been determined to be consistent with the Future Land Use Element, as provided for in Policies 5.9 through 5.13, the following provisions apply: • RESPONSE _The One Naples MUPD is not internally consistent with the Collier County Growth Management Plan. Refer to Stuart Exhibit 8 The One Naples Planning Analysis. Policy 5.6: New developments shall be compatible with, and complementary to, the surrounding land uses, as set forth in the Land Development Code. • RESPONSE The One Naples mixed planned development is not compatible with and complementary to the Gulf Shore Drive and Vanderbilt Beach Road neighborhoods. It is logically impossible for a project that doubles the density, increase height by 208%, incorporates 70% to 100% reduction in setbacks, features a 15-ft setback for a 1,066 linear foot +/- VBR and GSD 40 to 45-ft tall parking garage, and uses private rooftop recreation while not providing any functional common open space, to be found "complimentary and compatible" with surrounding land uses. The project fails to meet it's entitlement request criteria under LDC Section 10.02.13.B.5. Refer to the April 27, 2020 Stuart Opinion Letter and the July 15, 2020 Stuart Neighborhood Letter of Objection that are in the staff packet. Refer to Stuart Exhibit 5 Part Two Compatibility Standards and Exhibit 8 Part One The One Naples Planning Analysis, OBJECTIVE 7: Promote smart growth policies, reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and adhere to the existing development character of the Collier County, where applicable, and as follows: • RESPONSE The project introduces a Miami Beach -like Coastal Urban form into a SW Florida Naples Suburban form. Therefore it does not adhere to the existing Page 3 of 10 S I UARTANDASSOCIATES Planning & Design Services character of the community. It is logically and visually impossible for a project that doubles the density, increase height by 208%, incorporates 70% to 100% reduction in setbacks, features a 154t setback for a 1,066 linear foot +/- VBR and GSD 40 to 45-ft tall parking garage, and uses private rooftop recreation while not providing any functional common open space, to be found to "adhere to the existing development character" of the Collier County neighborhood. The One Naples project's development character is not compatible and complimentary to existing development character and is not internally consistent with Objective 7 and Policies 7.3 and 7.4. Refer to the April 27, 2020 Stuart Opinion Letter and the July 15, 2020 Stuart Neighborhood Letter of Objection that are in the staff packet. Refer to Stuart Exhibit 5 Part Two Compatibility Standards and Exhibit 8 Part 8 The One Naples Planning Analysis. Policy 7.3: All new and existing developments shall be encouraged to connect their local streets and/or interconnection points with adjoining neighborhoods or other developments regardless of land use type. The interconnection of local streets between developments is also addressed in Policy 9.3 of the Transportation Element. • RESPONSE _The applicant is applying for a plat vacation for Gulf Shore Court and the western portion of Center Street (PL20200000368 is a Petition for Vacation). By definition and logic, the plat vacation demonstrates comprehensive plan Policy 7.3 inconsistency since it eliminates an existing interconnected street grid. The One Naples Master Plan reduces intersection connection separation from 565-ft +/- to 350-ft +/- along VBR to Southbay Drive. The One Naples Master Plan creates a new "4-leg" project Gateway aligned with the VBR parking garage and in so doing, creates unsafe project east bound left -out turning movements that conflict with VBR west bound to parking garage south bound turning movements. The project further aggravates traffic congestion with particular emphasis on east bound VBR turning movements. The project is not consistent with Policy 7.3. Please refer to the technical traffic impact documentation provide by William Oliver, PE. Policy 7.4: The County shall encourage new developments to provide walkable communities with a blend of densities, common open spaces, civic facilities and a range of housing prices and types. • RESPONSE _The project proposes to use rooftop recreational facilities to meet its open space requirement. The LDC 1.08.02 defines Open Space as Areas that are not occupied by buildings. Consequently, the One Naples project cannot provide minimum open space are required by the LDC. In addition, the project features a 15-ft setback with an &ft VBR/GSD pathway within the public ROW. One Naples uses a 10-ft Southbay Drive and Center Street setback with 5-ft sidewalk. The project's pathway standards are below the code required 214t pathway standard. The project is based on using private rooftop recreation open space while not providing any functional common open space. This leads to increased intensity appearance while diminishing pedestrian scale walkable environments. The One Naples project's development height, bulk and building form does not encourage "walkable communities with common open space" The project eliminates functional mixed uses at the VBR/GSD intersection and streetscape level, thereby creating a 1,000 foot non -active "dead zone". The project is not compatible and complimentary to the GSD and VBR streetscape, hinders a walkable neighborhood environment, is is not consistent with 7.4. Refer to the April 27, 2020 Stuart Opinion Letter and the July 15, 2020 Stuart Neighborhood Letter of Objection that are in the staff packet. Refer to Stuart Exhibit 9 Compatibility Standards, Page 4 of 10 STUARTANDASSOCIATES Planning & Design Services FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT - UNDERLYING CONCEPTS Management of Coastal Development: Two major coastal development issues in Collier County are the protection of natural resources and the balancing of risk in natural hazard areas. (VII) Extensive populated areas in Collier County are vulnerable to periodic salt -water inundation from tropical storms or hurricanes. It is extremely important that an acceptable balance between at risk population and evacuation capability be achieved. In addition, public and private investment in such vulnerable areas must be carefully considered. • RESPONSE _One Naples requests an increase of density of 232% in the Coastal High Hazard Zone, from 74 units to 172 units. The new 98 units are equal to 167 additional persons to be evacuated and to be serviced in a post -evacuation environment. The Applicant's proposed mitigation is to provide the county with 174 emergency cots and and a 16-ft. 2-axel enclosed trailer. The estimated value of the proposed mitigation is $36,320. The estimated range of economic benefits to the Applicant, is $9.8MM to $29.3MM (@ $100K to $300K per new unit). The One Naples project fails to "balance population risk and evacuation capacity", along with fair and effective mitigation. The One Naples map amendment is contrary to public health and safety interests. Attainment of High Quality Urban Design -The report of the Regional/Urban Design Assistance Team (R/UDAT) for the Naples area, dated April 1987, and subsequent recommendations of the R/UDAT Citizen Committee, provides another underlying concept. While the Growth Management Plan as a whole provides the requisite foundation for superior urban design through a sound framework for growth (protection of natural resources, thoughtful guidance of land uses, adequate public facilities and adequate housing), the Future Land Use Element provides several additional measures. (XXI) Major attention is given to the patterns of commercial development in Collier County. Concern about commercial development relates to transportation impacts both on a micro (access to road network) and macro (distribution of trip attractors and resultant overall traffic circulation) level and it relates to aesthetics and sense of place. Within the Transportation Element a commitment to adopt standards for road access has been accomplished through the Access Collier County has also adopted Design Standards for all commercial development into the Land Development Code. These Architectural and Site development standards include building design, parking lot orientation, pedestrian access, vehicular movement, landscaping and lighting. These standards will provide for quality development that is responsive to the Community's character. • RESPONSE The One Naples development standards significantly vary from similar neighborhood zoning districts and, as such, do not provide for "High Quality Urban Design". Page 5 of 10 STUARTANDASSOCIATES Planning & Design Services FUTURE TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT D.3.D _Transportation Element C. Perspectives: 1. Land Use Issues (VI) The Transportation Element is closely related to the Future Land Use Element. It has long been the pattern that the development of land necessitates improvements and expansion to the transportation system. The two elements are so closely tied, in fact, that changes or shifts in the land use patterns can drastically impact the performance of the roadway system. It is for that reason that the County requires most land development proposals (e.g., DRI, rezone and conditional use requests) to submit a Traffic Impact Statement. An analysis of the proposal's impact is prepared and submitted to the recommending and approving authorities. (VI) The County has also recognized the importance of good site planning as it relates to a project's ingress and egress from the major roadway system. Inadequate control of access points, median openings and signalized intersections can accelerate the deterioration of the systems overall level of service just as fast as the increases in traffic volumes. The County has developed and adopted policies to control the number, location and type of access points to the road network. These policies are based on the Collier County Access Control Policy (Resolution No. 92-42) and follow- up Resolution No. 01-2471 and existing road and land use conditions, and are outlined in Section 4.04.02 of the Land Development Code • RESPONSE _The One Naples Master Plan reduces intersection connection separation from 565-ft +/- to 350-ft +/- along VBR to Southbay Drive. The One Naples Master Plan creates a new 114-leg" project Gateway aligned with the VBR parking garage and in so doing, creates unsafe project east bound left -out turning movements that conflict with VBR west bound to parking garage south bound turning movements. The project further aggravates traffic congestion with particular emphasis on east bound VBR turning movements. The project eliminates potential available and proximate C-3 neighborhood goods and services and therefore increases eastbound US 41 trips and trip lengths to obtain neighborhood goods and services. The project requires a parking space deviation to reduce the number of required parking spaces. These facts demonstrate that the project incorporates a very poor site plan as it relates to a project's ingress and egress from the major roadway system. Please refer to the technical traffic impact documentation provide by William Oliver, PE. TRANSPORTATION OBJECTIVE 3: Provide for the protection and acquisition of existing and future rights -of -way based upon improvement projects identified within the Five Year Work Program, Board approved development agreements, the Collier Metropolitan Planning Organization's (MPO's) adopted Long -Range Transportation Plan and/or similar Board approved studies, plans and programs. • RESPONSE _The One Naples 15-ft Vanderbilt Beach Road and Gulf Shore Drive (VBR and GSD) street setback effectively precludes any required future right-of-way and road expansion. Thus the development standard does not ensure the availability of land for utility facilities and is inconsistent with Objective 3 requirement to protect future right-of-way. Please refer to the technical traffic impact documentation provide by William Oliver, PE. Page 6 of 10 S I UARTANDASSOCIATES Planning & Design Services TRANSPORTATION OBJECTIVE 4: Provide for the safe and convenient movement of pedestrians and non -motorized vehicles through the implementation of the Collier County Comprehensive Pathways Plan. • RESPONSE _The project requires a parking space deviation to reduce the number of required parking spaces. This demonstrates that the project does not advance pedestrian interests. The project further aggravates traffic congestion with particular emphasis on east bound VBR turning movements. The project eliminates potential available and proximate C-3 neighborhood goods and services and therefore increases eastbound US 41 trips and trip lengths to obtain neighborhood goods and services. These examples of transportation impacts demonstrate that the project does not advance pedestrian interests. Please refer to the technical traffic impact documentation provide by William Oliver, PE. The project is not consistent with Objective 4. Policy 4.7: The County shall incorporate bike lanes in roadway resurfacing projects as is physically possible and will not result in a safety or operational problem. Policy 5.1 (the Question for you to address is whether the Applicant complies with 5.1; if they do we need to not discuss 5.1): The County Commission shall review all rezone petitions, SRA designation applications, conditional use petitions, and proposed amendments to the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) affecting the overall countywide density or intensity of permissible development, with consideration of their impact on the overall County transportation system, and shall not approve any petition or application that would directly access a deficient roadway segment as identified in the current AUIR or if it impacts an adjacent roadway segment that is deficient as identified in the current AUIR, or which significantly impacts a roadway segment or adjacent roadway segment that is currently operating and/or is projected to operate below an adopted Level of Service Standard within the five year AUIR planning period, unless specific mitigating stipulations are also approved. A petition or application has significant impacts if the traffic impact statement reveals that any of the following occur: a. For links (roadway segments) directly accessed by the project where project traffic is equal to or exceeds 2% of the adopted LOS standard service volume; b. For links adjacent to links directly accessed by the project where project traffic is equal to or exceeds 2% of the adopted LOS standard service volume; and c. For all other links the project traffic is considered to be significant up to the point where it is equal to or exceeds 3% of the adopted LOS standard service volume. (IX) Mitigating stipulations shall be based upon a mitigation plan prepared by the applicant and submitted as part of the traffic impact statement that addresses the project's significant impacts on all roadways. • RESPONSE _The One Naples Master Plan applicant's proposed circulation improvement approach does not address the very important, north Vanderbilt Beach Road ROW traffic circulation problem; that is, Southbay Drive and other residential neighborhoods seeking to turn east towards US 41, with various resulting turning movements and traffic congestion concerns. The One Naples Master Plan reduces intersection connection separation from 565-ft +/- to 350-ft +/- along VBR to Southbay Drive, thereby reducing mitigation efficiency and traffic circulation safety. The One Naples Master Plan creates a new "4-leg" project Gateway aligned with the VBR parking garage and in so doing, creates unsafe project east bound left -out turning movements that conflict with VBR west bound to parking garage south bound turning movements. The project further aggravates traffic congestion with Page 7 of 10 S I UARTANDASSOCIATES Planning & Design Services particular emphasis on east bound VBR turning movements and thereby reducing mitigation efficiency and traffic circulation safety. The project eliminates potential available and proximate C-3 neighborhood goods and services and therefore increases eastbound US 41 trips and trip lengths to obtain neighborhood goods and services. Please refer to the technical traffic impact documentation provide by William Oliver, PE. Refer to Stuart Exhibit 5 Part Two Compatibility Standards slides 31 and 32, and Exhibit 8 Part One The One Naples Planning Analysis slide 25 -16. The project is not consistent with Policy 4.7. TRANSPORTATION OBJECTIVE 7: Develop and adopt standards for safe and efficient ingress and egress to adjoining properties, and encourage safe and convenient on - site traffic circulation through the development review process. • RESPONSE _The One Naples Master Plan reduces intersection connection separation from 5654t +/- to 350-ft +/- along VBR to Southbay Drive. In doing so, driver reaction time is reduced, with an associated lowering of traffic safety. The One Naples Master Plan creates a new "4-leg" project Gateway aligned with the VBR parking garage. The project creates new and conflicting ingress and egress turning movement conflicts. The project further aggravates traffic congestion. Please refer to the technical traffic impact documentation provide by William Oliver, PE. Refer to Stuart Exhibit 8 The One Naples Planning Analysis. The project is not consistent with Objective 7. Policy 7.1: Collier County shall apply the standards and criteria of the Access Management Policy as adopted by Resolution and as may be amended to ensure the protection of the arterial and collector system's capacity and integrity. • RESPONSE _The One Naples Master Plan reduces intersection connection separation from 565-ft +/- to 350-ft +/- along VBR to Southbay Drive, The 215-ft connection spacing reduction lessens roadway capacity by lowering vehicle travel time with a subsequent increase in traffic congestion. Policy 7.2: The County shall require the submission of a neighborhood traffic impact assessment as a part of all rezone and conditional use applications. This study will analyze the proposed project's impact on surrounding neighborhood streets. • RESPONSE _The One Naples Master Plan TIS did not evaluate the proposed 215-ft intersection separation reduction to Southbay Drive. The One Naples Master Plan TIS did not fully evaluate the requests a new 114-leg" project Gateway aligned with the VBR parking garage and its left -out east bound turning movements that conflict with VBR west bound to parking garage south bound turning movements. Therefore the TIS did not properly analyze the proposed project's impact on surrounding neighborhood streets. Please refer to the technical traffic impact documentation provide by William Oliver, PE. The project is not consistent with Policy 7.2 Policy 7.4: The County shall encourage new developments to provide walkable communities with a blend of densities, common open spaces, civic facilities and a range of housing prices and types. • RESPONSE _The project is based on a 154t setback VBR and GSD for1,066 linear feet +/- of parking garage at 40 to 45-ft tall, with a pathway design that does not meet 4.02.38 C-3 Mixed Use and PUD 2.03.06 21-ft wide pathway standards. One Naples Page 8 of 10 STUARTANDASSOCIATES Planning & Design Services uses a 15-ft setback with an 8-ft VBR/GSD pathway within the public ROW. One Naples uses a 10-ft Southbay Drive and Center Street setback with 54t sidewalk. The project does not incorporate the code required 21-ft pathway standard. The project is based on using private rooftop recreation open space while not providing functional common open space. This fact leads to increased intensity appearance while diminishing pedestrian scale walkable environments and neighborhood compatibility. The One Naples project's development height, bulk and building form does not encourage "walkable communities with common open space". The project eliminates functional mixed uses at the VBR/GSD intersection and streetscape level, thereby creating a 1,000 foot non -active "dead zone". The project is not compatible and complimentary to the GSD and VBR streetscape, hinders a walkable neighborhood environment, is is not consistent with 7.4. Refer to the April 27, 2020 Stuart Opinion Letter and the July 15, 2020 Stuart Neighborhood Letter of Objection that are in the staff packet. Refer to Stuart Exhibits 8 and 9. FUTURE CONSERVATION AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT HURRICANE COASTAL MANAGEMENT GOAL 12: To Make Every Reasonable Effort To Ensure The Public Safety, Health and Welfare Of People and Property From The Effective of Hurricane Damage • RESPONSE _One Naples requests an increase of density of 232% in the Coastal High Hazard Zone, from 74 units to 172 units. The new 98 units are equal to 167 additional persons to be evacuated and to be serviced in a post -evacuation environment. The One Naples project fails to "make every reasonable effort to ensure public safety". The One Naples project fails to provide for fair and effective mitigation in a balanced manner. The One Naples map amendment is contrary to public health and safety interests and is inconsistent with Goal 12. Please refer to the testimony and documentation provided by Daniel Trescott, MUARP regarding hurricane evacuation and mitigation. Policy 12.1.2: Land use plan amendments in the Category 1 hurricane vulnerability zone shall only be considered if such increases in densities provide appropriate mitigation to reduce the impacts of hurricane evacuation times. • RESPONSE One Naples will provide 174 emergency cots and and a 16-ft. 2-axel enclosed trailer. These items are for shelter and not for hurricane evacuation times. Hence, the One Naples does not provide appropriate mitigation to reduce the impacts of hurricane evacuation times and is inconsistent with 12.1.10 • One Naples requests an increase of density of 232% in the Coastal High Hazard Zone, from 74 units to 172 units. The new 98 units are equal to 167 additional persons to be evacuated and to be serviced in a post -evacuation environment. The Applicant's proposed mitigation is to provide the county with 174 emergency cots and and a 164t. 2-axel enclosed trailer. The estimated value of the proposed mitigation is $36,320. The estimated range of economic benefits to the Applicant, is $9.81MM to $29.31MM (@ $100K to $300K per new unit). The One Naples project fails to provide for fair and effective mitigation in a balanced manner. The One Naples map amendment is contrary to public health and safety interests and is inconsistent with 12.1.2. Please refer to the testimony and documentation provided by Daniel Trescott, MUARP regarding hurricane evacuation and mitigation. Page 9 of 10 STUARTANDASSOCIATES Planning & Design Services Policy 12.1.13: The County shall continue to mitigate previously identified shelter deficiencies through mitigation from Developments of Regional Impact, Emergency Management Preparedness and Enhancement grants, Hazard Mitigation and Pre -disaster Mitigation Grant Programs funding, and available funds identified in the State's annual shelter deficit studies. • RESPONSE _The Applicant has not provided a gation plan for county staff review. Hence there is no evidence that the cots and trailer is sufficient to mitigate for previously identified shelter deficiencies. The One Naples project is contrary to and is inconsistent with 12.1.3. Policy 7.2.1: The County shall apply the marina siting criteria contained in the Collier County Manatee Protection Plan (NR-SP-93-01), May 1995 in order to direct increased boat traffic away from sensitive manatee habitats. • RESPONSE _The One Naples GMP map amendment has not provided information regarding its requested marina. The application violates FSS 163.3177(6) by not providing any data and analysis regarding marina siting, fuel dock location, seagrass baseline and impacts, manatee impacts, water quality baseline and impacts, and other key data and analysis. The One Naples map amendment is inconsistent with 7.2.1. Policy 7.2.2: Sea -grass beds shall be protected through the application of Policies 6.3.1, 6.3.2 and 6.3.3 of this Element. • RESPONSE _The One Naples GMP map amendment has not provided information regarding its requested marina. The application violates FSS 16331 t 7(6) by not providing any data and analysis regarding marina siting and seagrass baseline and impacts. The One Naples map amendment is inconsistent with 7.2.2. Policy 10.1.5: New marinas shall conform to the following criteria: a. Marinas must provide vehicular parking and sewage pump -out facilities; b. Fueling facilities shall be designed to contain spills from on -land equipment and shall be prepared to contain spills in the water. c. Marina facilities must be accessible to all public services essential to ensure their safe operation. d. Marinas and multi -slip docking facilities shall prepare hurricane plans for approval which describe measures to be taken to minimize damage to marina sites and neighboring properties and the environment; this hurricane plan shall be reviewed and approved by the County. e. Dry storage should be encouraged over wet storage. • RESPONSE _The One Naples GMP amendment has not provided information regarding its requested marina. The application violates FSS 163.3177(6) by not providing data and analysis regarding marina siting, marina service access and circulation, dumpster service location, fuel dock location and fuel spill protection, water quality baseline and water quality protection and management, and seagrass baseline and impacts. The One Naples map amendment is inconsistent with 10.1.5. Page 10 of 10 S I UAH I ANDASSOCIATES Planning & Design Services Exhibit Seven Street Vacation Value and Applicant Benefit Assessment CASE _THE ONE NAPLES GMP MAP AMENDMENT, MUPD REZONING &STREET VACATION Page 1 of 4 STUARTANDASSOCIATES Planning & Design Services The Value and Benefit Analysis _ Applicant Obtains Est, $7.49MM In Unique Economic Benefits, Deregulatory Benefits and Substantial Density Increase STREET VACATION BENEFITS 6 APPLICANT DEVELOPMENT COMh1ITtdENT ASSESSI.IENT; ovrtni2o t-0UPD Site Area 5.42 ac. Existing Site Value Acquisition Value (Collier Prop. Appraiser) S 25r300,000-00 Price Per Ac. S 5,464,362.8S per ac. Price Per SF S 125.44 psf ROW Value $ 4,316 846.65 ROW Units (assume 16 DUS/ac.) 13 units ROW Unit Value $ 300,000.00 Est, ROW Unit Value $ 3 792 000.00 TOTAL EST, R04V LAND & UNIT VALUE 8 108 846.65 DEVELOPER COMMITMENTS 174 Emergency t•lanagement Costs SI80 per EST COSTS S 31,320.00 16-f 2 axel Enclosed Utility Trailer S 50000,00 Traffic Signal $ 400,000,00 VBR Extended Garage Left Turn Lane S 125,000.00 Garage Tech S 50,000.00 South Bay Dr, Improvements (1) Gulf Shore Or Sidewalk (1) VBR 8-ft Multi -use Pathway (1) Enhanced Landscaping 1 Total Est. Developer Commitment Value S 611,320.00 (1) Identified Developer Commitments are generally required by LOC 6.05.00 Drainage 8. 6.06.00 Transportation; along with a marginal developm¢nt/maintenanc¢ cost diff¢renc¢, are nat aedited to developer commitment est. value. BENEFIT TO OEVELOPt•1ENT COMt•11Tt4ENT ASSESSMENT ROWVALUE 04 S 4 316,846.65 Est. ROW Value (excludes new units) Net Benefit Ta The AppIrcant S 3 705 526.65 BENEFIT TO DEVELOPMENT COMMITMENT ASSESSMENT ROVl &NEW UNIT VALUE S 3,108 846.65 Est. ROW Value and 13 New ROV! units $300K er Net Benefit Ta The A olrcant S 7 497 526.65 APPLICANT EST. C05T5 S 1,750 000.0r; 6,358,846.65 Page 2 of 4 S I UARTANDASSOCIATES Planning & Design Services LDC 6.06.00 Transportation Sidewalks, Bike Lanes & Pathways €,.fl€�.tiZ Sidewaiks, Bike lane and Psihway Requirements A Ail do�realopnnetnts mist construct sidmwalks. blkrD lanes, gnat pathway:r»„ �� dos�rrboa� bi�iow. Fear projects subject to architectural design standards, see LDC section 5. 5.08 F. for related Carovis Liras. 1 fytarcai crass ettiae' Sld(twalka grad bike tat5ea must tart constructed wittliti p�ata'�c and' priwato ritrt�-ai-wayr �r easements, witicla are adjacent to the site prier to issuance of Via first ceriffocale of occupancy p�ara; unless eathe;rwisri deterrttirxeef by thri Co;rnty Manager or deslnese, as fo'io�ais: $idewalk.s—Bath 5idt'S' ' � Ikea Lanes-aRcatt9 sides t5 fect wade 5 {eat wide Arterials and caile�tars it Local/internal Accessway 0 ' > except that Drily roquir•ed on one side: ('closest t�i ihei deavetoprtterrtjwh�re rrghtt�af•way is adjacent lo. but no, within, rite= subjeact development and except as seat fcartla below in this. election. 2 - Unless otherwise daterrrr#nod by the County futanagar or designee, that the existing F2QiP4° crass -section is p9tys�elty ��rts9rairaecf or cartsiri�ctian wrsu#d result. i� unsefe cartdataats. �- unless otherwise identified on the Co flee County Comprehensive Pathways dart ltfadata, as amended, as a potantaai €eft-stretrf pattaway c�rrir. 2. Sidewalks and bike lanes mist tse cnstrtaniead wilitin public and private r3gfita-at-vray or aas4rrtarris. which arer internal tc� thes site. as iciliws: yfiaCu i dross 5irfew�aiks--Elratfi sacks ` . ' ` _° ` ' Btke L;anes--�#tr�th sides .• ` � `, Section 6 feet wide S feet wide Arteraals and collectors it k total/Inler€mal Aterssw;ty X Page 3 of 4 STUARTANDASSOCIATES Planning & Design Services ' - Except that only required on one side (closest to the development) where r'Ighto-offtway is adjacent to; but not within, the subject development and except as set forth below in this section _ tJnireals otherwtrtse determined by the County Manager, or designaa, that the existing KUW cross-section is physically canstrained or construction would result M. unsafe conditions, k ;_Prior to the issuance of individual certificates of occ,�r�cy, the required sirlevrals elor the indivAual parcels frontage shall be constructed. "- p`rior tra the issuance of � percont of the irt�fii.�at�s df occupancy Guth reed by a final sObdivision plat. seta Improvement or site development plan, all sidevwaNs One bilge lanes shall be constructed, unless otherwise determined by the County Manager or designee, I �equiresf pathways„ as identif In the Collier County Comprehensive f�athwways filar, must be constructed a minimum of 12 feet in width, unto public and private rlgbts-ofvway or easements, which are adjacent to or internal to the site. Phor to issuance of the first permanent certificate of occupancy for constructio€r., authorized by a final subdivision plat, SAC improve►°neni, or site development plan, all requiTeo pathways shali be providers, Jniess otherwise determined by the County Manager or designee, ♦ I er Major Collector and Artarlals Page 4 of 4 N O �b X W �. Jo r�� c� I� = o cv Z I y c) fl CO � I N O _ O w Z C G 0 '� m O o0� MZ Er I �C� I =CCW E z °Io a E o Lo o ce) V c o Y U J M M U O +� O� m cCO �� a +�+ 042 (/� N U LL � O O o 0C M LL p _ 'o O O 4" C H c c:t c CO L ONCID CO °a co O O I Q' U LL LL I:U c O U W ZL a Q. W V a a N. y N .� ��mc = F �F a a QmC.i0LULL: C� -� / r 4 it, ,i; Van Imp AW it VAM �, �' ab r r� :At Oa Or Or '4 tiob ,will 1 •' n �t 48 off TA, r �lo w a µ v •+ y t G� 10 ryir C (u44 O .O�w fib ' wow MAW or 44 04 ✓.�r. it rl lk lliq FFt asp, ly .0 Fa• • _ . ALM •� LAM aw r i 00 f c LLs q ! V N1 d+ • 0 y + w ' la 0 tPao LAM YI LI. "' m p N LAM s am M cc ' 4ma p � • s v %0 a+ f °� �► Z s _ cn Li. 1 ._' • • - , 1V . I oMONO oc s et. CL cm •Arm A ma mime .' I an o �► •� O J Vf to W O y r ip LAW c LAW of yy ++ W t m 1 I +&C U V. pM Un s 0 O aI CO) N U UO Q Mimi a u O . ,--( 4) U °' C) O � N 4 m 4 4 4 4 GI F i T 1 i� A N . �j 4VA,21" rm ;T I`S o 7:1 0 Q u V v �j u bL � N � �N U CI i r4 b IJ O 5 V UO o � oo' U Q UO Q7' Um' m 'r�Wvi •U 'UO u � m ¢ �M� �. .k r ae, e. r ®. r 0 .T � R �n r cn O TIM .�, u +r u c� L4i a� W V) o I--1 cu N O I E O 1 fa cc O N F-+ t z .� O Q C � II V, >� Z Ln aj 0 Q v W u 0000 f V n • LJ �WIWIW k 0 Q� Y J � 0 Q s\V1 ct I r•"1 � u fl] L N ro • C� ru mmm i — w V ai 11 d1 rn T ,.1 r� N c O � V �C�l o �o C Ln 41 V' N too Q 0 � •'`'�, o v iJ Q w C �-+ J V G O v 4 U w G ¢ 06 N ;�L Ln N uj ct V 3 N H u 0 0 V V U Q J 0 Q N CIS bA U �1 u 0 N N x C �L•` C y N t 5i manses an LL_N 4.0 C I LJ u N d `� u O n c �dov� oo:goo.� u om ' 41 ` °O' Q$7 g L t_!% 7 O C L O vi p q N w° M. w Q^ Ln �°J e ., U N. N `p rn ° m N U U rn rn m S rn 2 17 m c `LA A co •' SamvAm N v v L) u C QJ C O C O O s o in in V — rn w n N U O Q N V u Y (Q Q Y N a � c � O OrYa v N Y c 0 c v � •u � a Y O y0 N v � m �J N n N v Q O 0 m L u rn N h N a� o� !vim • N ' �V G G � cz � G N (�� n vi Q (z ^ o E U ocn O cz cz •E U N i a =0 CZ cn O cz U N p C 06 O N od G Nr CZ 4� G G U •° `-mc: (D +i 4� N O C O mc C\i 0 c� m .o E E co n•-' s o ro�u,ca 0)�L v 3 +. l Qp aD c 075 7 a 0 fd O � C U ` L� c cua)Cp O a)p> f (n C iir N Oo No +' a'� � E O 0 X o N Q) � j O tti O (n L N11 � j ro aa) 2!,� mo o o a>i o f 3 cLo w a X i > a � c� ro U) Mn a) cm E E ai '` 0 El- � aI a) —Moos C) � a� c �= a) CL ' " cu o -o a cq c •D O c „ O NZ a>.� cv � 0 wo Z� µ 3 ca a c c a� — a) rnp ; _ a) .c mcu ca �Ut cn cp�pv +� +, O c a p -o coy � axi v = _ U C _ p c L N (nD C3 (n U cn 0.0 0 1 rm c. a s co Q O U O +d+ C cV t 0 a) am i a) > > += 43 me C'f =3 x;'o tV pc.� Z �c api w +, c UpC)a)� d m v)O R} OL O0,u.O O•� 0M C j(n LOU �o ^a of �p �� a�i�0:3 > 0 c a >> O �%" o o c E n° p` L N •p . L c w o"'O N -O p c "- U c13 w mp o pc�p ,.,a,— rn a) na) CO 'n,U Ocacdca �ca 'o _ Vt o —U)wu�o L apO} mccri WcNOoccnUaro� Oa) 15 c�92 mn�oE0 •co n a) Oa E Oct U O a>jna, co co m �-.CD E c_c `a a o a> Q'Ocn -o�E v a' ' N=0>C pO U mn, 0 a) o�� L 3 °' � Ecn E � cYa p ` O a�m � � a) W LOU a af- �ocncn �' °�ciri.5 c3m6L6 .2? 2'.8 E (D o :.�rOOOOOqroom - u r O •ate • % bJD � U a� C1� a) bi Q OOOOOOOmi • w p •� _ O .� •� � .� -'--' �AL A6 a e m tf1 O M V' I� N U1 O to V U U U U U U U U U In N m M� t' � 10 c^000 M Q� m ti .4 O .4 N N N N O ❑ ,j 7 �+? .O M(� d M O u) m�UCD L pOp I i at M O W U O �..i O .-� .-1 m O N a" z m0mrnoo,mmm0) E 3 rn o rn rn o rn rn m m m 0 cc C oiJ C C O m U U m m r s 00 £ O m cn L �' v � _ 3 0 _ > ❑ 10 w ❑ O Ch O " L p m � L y < M w N 5 O 7 w (� (A L LD (� ~ V) N TO U M lA ❑ M p O a U -ec ea O (v � (Oj O Z: o mo E c oQzas0 m m c t s > z a L�LmmUEC) 0 D o m E o n o ci mcu m E i L ai a`) a`) v m t m E y m u c-0-Q�p 3 u o mamiamirmmm4)i c V mar ma>>>V)1-u N m vi W 0 W a r7 D a y W Q J F_- Q mZ = W )( Z WO t 3 v m 0 L O � Z � N f� N � E o o�U C � (fl 00 N d y N @ N � °)0 a� E� o a0i 2 C L N O +. Q a aZ O N p0 N N y MINE, L c 0 SINNED E " 3: O) F aka Is t � F- O n T N � LO c �ro T CO r Lr)00 in cD a ce) c ti cV LO i N r IwIIIII i` Lr) lf) � 6i O p N Ln E T 7 r N N �L ti 6i o00 U) cCO m r C N o `n a N ++ 0) O r N �Lo OWN , O U L T ;.., � �CV) 4)O �L o (� C: O (q N o--� cCo 0 N Co T U) O N N N � � rCca0,, cl N E (0 N m �1 O . _ •O N 'CO c ,n cv y E�(D O ] m C E O EXX Q E DR3N0 � >Eoa� 0 m D O L +� G 2 c0 — �ZOyC CQa_ (D C L V O C N N C (n to ro 'u► .a a o�i 3D (n2 o ow U�I`N0 a)c U ONE=O � On � N a � � « 0 0 p O U r N O O L O$ O N O)L 41111 EQa0rn 'N c O .0 N Q�c a c c 0)ro Q .N (L) 'c m c� �c .. c .o *' III E 70 o o°' rov, 3QE o c ❑ m o ❑t c Ida r c kj c o co p O ro or 1 C:CY)0 N °row TIC rn°r zb c «• c �_ ro c) m wo c ° o.c c L 6 SIT O N (u ro VIIIIIIN❑ U c c,' O C'}a) .apt CE didC a) p OU —C3 co O Q p a) Q a) C U L CIO T—F .0 Low dIddIddN ,N `� �, U > C fn C� 7 O c[f ro ro co ro ro ❑ U O O t�' ' >, O� �ro p mo n ro c �. do ros C ro ca ma CO c vcc; O cflO Ud �E� v)�- ro �� U rove cncnE O to cL a) QWO . O cCi O0 Q A � d o �8L mc +� a) c c U 3 U L� U. N ro 7, U U C cd O U +�+ wo m O C E a) C N ro.� N ro a —� ro a O cv-o �iiiiiiiiiito m a � rrC_t Lcoo 0 p •j1 N ,= v c ,.,Id 1..1. ca c C Q 0 r ro 0 'O N �. = Ow cv p i a °� a C3 ao :r CD N U ro s c v ° O M p C acN p" c �+ N ��w c U fir' , '' m C C ro�� ro avi 0. a) i t O O O N. U OIL 4,111,11, w O U O C ;Q} O?� dd Flo da TOWNS U _ O O cz vJ O > ro c �❑ V a cdwo u 0 0, 0 N z c+� c� V i V jo L I r ck tot MEI..�.N& r Q o N o rn co o co m O D rn N IS U � w cm IL c° 0 c N U o L W5 7 J C7 od `m c a c '— j LL U� Co UI + N U X ma O 'No LOL NO w c Y C U (C o a) c)L O to m LL k k 06 rn C Y (0 I I M r LL cn c o O g co a c O �a Z c ca No a N C7 I° ° $ d) L C) c_ I O a) � U) > I s *... a. N 75 co 0 ozs O m Z T A � I E2.0 a")Nad o : N Y 'o C >: co C CO N II0m i> C O N U N I O *" $ c � $ NIT C\l } d NI C\l Lo co �� r N NI �0 3 3 U oro o cr o o ° m r HHCOm0 ch o N-0 U C O Z:) = Z N 00 T r u.. tf1� IIIIIIIIIIIII rI I m V1 �i i C W O �- [� LPL, � o � o U�) o o = m N IQO (3) 3 U J co �0000 O - - o '• IV`4� ►.. A N u E� m ca a _ cq C� � of AP a Ch A m I g �y cc rr g kA u ry ,� a i, j 2 rl wc o �V b� avdi LA 3 � CS m Lu 4u LA p LA c �c N 41 �� '..• J p7 ~ C uT L a A CUl FLI s CL O V m YI O W 3 °?1 mfn t It b J J�- •-� G/bl V/ O l7 � Q � V ..- rV M sf _ ,c .° Cl 4=j Mimi • bb �--� O • "oafA, AAA b!J cn .Em a J N d Ln , , a 0 mc LA u- N h 0 Q �J eN - mj . ,__, r D 7N H R . ;(4 0 L O N O a o O p Q) Cc U co L U ) CL Q ca O • �o ,C) O � Q CO U co 1 a) N Cl)• Q) s LIP�� r N sm p L2Q) •� N Ico + o .� (70 ■� cz i mc O W p EAU a� '� '■■• CTJ U a > V o c`n � .z) a cam umwo Cc: Q) 0 1 •i•r N COX Lo LZ cz LU r 0 U) F LO � Q7(3 °N M QU cri cp U � U Cl, C U O) QQj Q :N Q (D Q a) � 0 +.,J o Q O aoQ,Lk� o S 0 Q) aaico� :C � S: Q) ° C) U) cz N aCO O O Y O (z Q) 4m�a�o i o CO c o ° Q o IQ 0 co 0 N 0O N Q) oc 0 Q) N � CY) � QS U O IIc" O a N a N U CO� � O U as Q Q) CQ N z .O Q) I. IIz to LO z: Q O �a � � O .o a co o cp C Q) O .co N Q• N O �� O .IZ "- U cu � U � Q c� °cUCO Q) CO Lzzz U U ° C)� Q 'c ~ O N � � O c� U o ° U Q U C3 It L co U OO + Qo �Q(a)Q Q) Q. O O J � 0 0 0 O .C/) o oa ro O ,U !Z �a O o O Q U s O c mC/a) Q o N O x co CO p U o U O C/) o Y o oQ�Q Q) U O7 cn N �Q � Q) N Jz co � O U :� L O Q) Q O O T 0 N N O T U) 0 U) Q C 0 ci9 O C0 L m m cu 0 LL m (SS a 2 an (v Y � � o) o) O ca U) cco N � vi c E N 01 N Cl L U +`Q V) >1 U O O �-0 m75 c 0 EpZcE � +, E E c ca - ca > ro W 00 Er > 3 Y Q C r O V •- O N .O y a) b a`a) c0i + !n U (d (0 L O O N V) U-O N�'o a) O a) I O O N U Q ac o 0 NIII co > � o v E�'o c ro a ro 0> c OE0E°�cc O O a) a U O C N O C (U c v= O IIy 0�� Qac)�O `0.0 U E N U) r) Qyw ~ c 0 $ E 61110 m c N o O T O .� Lci 0 ca C) 'E C: MEMO coC a) 0 O O0 U . U _C O C '> > o C U o (A Q (� ro�U) a0 C��C7 M 61111111 0 m L a � I >~,_ 10 (� o N OO C Dr- O , MMEMO +' Qc U U � a Q a) m O O . Q E n O c Ea' roa) 0o0 >)E N 0 x a) (D a) i LD T � r T Ecu co c 0 co MEN c0 c0 O N U C .0 E O N O - = m '� C a O U L I-OQ 0 co Qi ) o m � C ro m c .ro U .O +�., U t (A to O U N a) N v1 a) p>j O = La —cam °��.NZT 0 a) coC 0 o ai O U '— U> N a O C N > c O L Cm m a) F- a) a E ` Y a) O U (D O U >, a) 0 a)0Ea 6�O O-N O Q 0 E oz > c C m O °D TD cz c O O ca N O ca t' Q. a) (� O U YN N U � N 0 o'o� �C roa) U N O a) (aE: roro c cn a ro Q O O O o) Y o -0 a) C UIIIIIII O U `U O O N U N .fl U O U N o_>Q» I a a) c fA c° 0) �c o J x E Coc�E0 Eco a) II1,IIII c0 }� 0 C: (d E� a, a E -O } cc Q C ro O a) r U U ro C 0 Q a) (d U U ro c O ro ) U r a) I m Q� 30E ONENESS C Cc U O C •O V� C IIIIIIIN Lo C! �C CL .� O U Q m to ,d Eui y co 0 y v i,,, d W '0 i V 0 1l U)SIMI@ fn Cc E y� A 0 0monsoon OPINION IC 'O O y � cc rn aoi .� a, = c a 'a ai PIIIIIIN MOORE* *a � m Q 0 o f I— °: a d V m co o aJ cv E �-% C o a) 06 00000 E c� t 0 o a� Z ca U) Fes-• •� C C cOC O a .= N O C 0 �J rvCOD OPINION cn oa Y i E -Q E Of � U ' U Of 3 1 $ *' --- Q t = N a) f0 U LIJSOMEONE Alm no G. fU +�-• W w V �3 � N Z Y T min co mix 0) W Z N 70 z oa CLo U � O MOSINEE NCMD O �Lo w� E E O CL � � d i yO. ml Y LM U a tA L f0) X Y w G� y C CD L O s w m CD CO O 'C c R 1 �"' o z 0 N lO N O r U) a> m �U O Q C M o ft�c v v a .a M LL a 4 E b a av,•O v ap v kjj p v w a b qj 'il O O a W ` I L ! — a O CIO C U @� a : ki a t Z "a N a .c a c �M a o` Ora 3 M o � I a 4 .O � J Gl W Summit 0 d C o_ v / le C! _ _ f 106 m Ommams GJ Q � E" i W H cz 0 N L0 N O T U) m ro �U O U Q co Oil U) U W m LIM ca U) 0 LL N cz Q. 2 d b V T �o � 3 d L N a � x' M 00 M w,cu Cq W O V O M y Q IMEM CL tZ 04 O F � 0 r � N � M o Q c� y : ZI i cz f Z W Z y SOMEONE LU CD CY) cc cm "= a O c c� c C7 v o a v oa 0 U Lo c o�C 06 ' M in V cz 0 � M a L W )` W V }� E > Dion LM 0 'C 0 LL U N V) 70 is m2 mo N c _ n C TT LOU/ c v X y fr O = m O oa o "3 c c° Lip m o LL L ~ 0 3 v u V) a r v o =aca C/) a uj ,1 boo m C N v b F° � Lj c O i �i od v at rn mdin F. ry v O. °cam 0 c c Li a O ja w OF.z = �Ni O O in ,C a b .� ` 3 3 C w a� d, oajo� W m ;��m _ co cc m ca m co >iiU O > L YV/ ^ N N 3 o J~ ma a V) O C ¢mv �rinic i Q FM P Subject: Proposed One Naples Project Collier County Planning Commission Board of County Commissioners Re: Proposed One Naples project Dear Commission and Commissioners: The Pelican Bay Foundation (Foundation) recognizes and values the importance of redevelopment to maintain property values and the quality of life in our community. We appreciate both the multiple and complex considerations of the criteria provided for in the land development code, the comprehensive plan amendments, the rezoning requests, etc., and, further, respect the concerns, objections, or support, of various community interest groups, individuals, or businesses. The Foundation expressly neither supports nor opposes the proposed One Naples project. In fact, we appreciate the open communication with which Stock Development has approached this proposed project. However, because properties within Pelican Bay have been cited as compatibility justifications for the One Naples project, the Foundation believes it has an obligation to clarify how Pelican Bay differs from the area to the north of Vanderbilt Drive since it is not part of Pelican Bay, Pelican Bay was created years ago as a comprehensive, well -planned, mixed -use Planned Unit Development, and it is vastly different from the neighborhoods to our south, north, and east. The planning, the PUD regulations and the applicable private declarations and covenants that govern Pelican Bay and have controlled its development include a myriad of factors, controls, constraints and planning techniques to regulate and manage development. The allowance of high-rise construction and mixed -use development are regulated and controlled by multiple different and important factors and controls. To compare only height in Pelican Bay to other areas, without also considering the overall planning and multiple other constraints that apply to Pelican Bay, seems like selective cherry picking. It is not an apt comparison. For example, the maximum height of principal structures within the Pelican Bay PUD is two hundred (200) feet above finished grade, provided that minimum yards must be maintained, from tract or development parcel lines, right-of-way lines and/or the edge of the gutter of a private road, of fifty (50) feet or one-half (1/2) the height of the structure, whichever is greater. Simply stated, Pelican Bay is awell-planned, well -organized and well -run large-scale development that should not be compared or used in a comparative analysis to justify any position (for or against) relative to development outside of its jurisdictional boundaries unless the entire Pelican Bay regulatory scheme of controls and constraints are similarly included. We wish you well in your deliberations of the value and appropriateness of the proposed One Naples project for the Vanderbilt Beach neighborhood. Sincerely, Jiwv i-Eo�pe�wa�-ead� President /COO Pelican Bay Foundation 6251 Pelican Bay Blvd. Naples, FL 34108 239-260-8460 direct 239-597-6927 fax Uittrkt I Dirhict 2 Diahict 3 Dlrhict 4 December 8,2020 Dlsttlct5 Dear Commissioner William McDaniel, onF($ifua DEC 10 2020 OFFICES OF COLLIER COUNTY BOAFD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS I have owned 3 differentcondos on Vanderbilt Beach since 1988. I lived at the north end of, Gulf Shore Drive for 12 years, moved to the Strand for 5 years, and have now been back on Vanderbilt Beach for the past 15 years. I have seen Naples growand change incredibly. I believe lmmokalee Road was just a 2 lane road in 1988, with no curbs all the way to I-75. When I first started coming down here it was difficult to find a restaurant in the area, especially ifyou couldn't have dinner until 8pm. The Pewter Mug was about it back then. I am not against change at all because progress is inevitable and necessary. I appreciate a lot of the development that has gone on but I don't agree with Naples One and what they are proposing. It just doesn't make sense to me to let them have the variances they're asking for and giving them permission to build such an immense project, with such tall buildings, so much density, and very little setback. I don't feel it's fair for them to compare their density and structure with other buildings on the same property tlat are only two and four stories high. A four story building with a larger setback doesn't have the same intrusion on the area as two 16 story buildings (including parking) with very little setback, and more buildings with 5 stories. They've also compared themselves to the Rifz Carlton which has a much bigger setback and plenty of trees and shrubbery that you hardly see the hotel from the street when you're walking on Vanderbilt Beach Road. They want to take up so much of the parcel with buildings that I'm afraid that flooding will be a huge problem. When we have heavy rains, the current vacant land where they want to build, has water sitting in it Where will the excess water go? We already have issues with our sewers not being able to handle the rains here, They say they're going to lengthen the drive up lane to the public parking garage but what they're proposing isn't even possible because the entrance to the Ritz Carlton is there. They say they're keeping the parking on the street but in their models they only show about 8 parking spaces as opposed to the current number ofspaces on Vanderbilt Beach Road. My former husband is a developer in Chicago, both residential and commercial, so I've been exposed to meetings before the villages and their councilmen. Notall of them were positive but most resolved in giving open land back to the residents to enjoy. We built baseball and football fields for the communities, and we gave back land as preserves with lakes and [ens. I know a lot of people want the parcel to have some sort of development, and that's understandable, but truthfully what is there doesn't bother me. It's part of our charm, dating back many years. I know Stock has a lot of money invested in this project but so do we as residents ofthe area. Now I hear that Stock is offering to do some improvements to some of the other condos in the project area in exchange for some of the residents to write letters to the councilmen saying they approve the projecL Developers with fat pockets assume they have the ability to get what they wanL They'll be setting a precedent for future building by being given these variances. No one in the Naples area wants us to start looking like Ft. Lauderdale or Miami. I don't agree with Stock, as they sternly warned us at the last meeting when they weren't getting the feedback they wanted, "be careful what you wish for, we'll build a commercial development and then you'll be sorry". lf a commercial developmentwas feasible then there would have been one built before now. They can still make money by cutting the project in half. The increase in traffic will be substantial. I drive Vanderbilt Beach Road to my volunteer job at Ave Maria University and during high season it has taken me 30 minutes to get from Gulf Shore Drive to Tamiami Trail. Imagine what it's going to be like if they increase the density like they're proposing! Please, just don't approve a project of this size. Don't give them the extreme variances they're asking for. Please listen to your constituents, the residents of Naples who are going to be most impacted. Sincerely, Anita Wilcheck