The URL can be used to link to this page

HEX Agenda 03/11/2021AGENDA COLLIER COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER WILL HOLD A HEARING AT 9:00 AM ON THURSDAY, MARCH 11, 2021 IN CONFERENCE ROOMS 609/610 AT THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT/PLANNING & REGULATION BUILDING, 2800 N. HORSESHOE DRIVE, NAPLES, FLORIDA AS PART OF AN ONGOING INITIATIVE TO PROMOTE SOCIAL DISTANCING DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC, THE PUBLIC WILL HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY TO PROVIDE PUBLIC COMMENTS REMOTELY, AS WELL AS IN PERSON, DURING THIS PROCEEDING. INDIVIDUALS WHO WOULD LIKE TO PARTICIPATE REMOTELY, SHOULD REGISTER AT: http://bit.ly/Mar11HEXSpeakerRegistration ANY TIME AFTER THE AGENDA IS POSTED ON THE COUNTY WEBSITE WHICH IS 6 DAYS BEFORE THE MEETING OR THROUGH THE LINK: http://colliercountyfl.iqm2.com/Citizens/default.aspx INDIVIDUALS WHO REGISTER WILL RECEIVE AN EMAIL IN ADVANCE OF THE PUBLIC HEARING DETAILING HOW THEY CAN PARTICIPATE REMOTELY IN THIS MEETING. FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ABOUT THE MEETING, CALL THOMAS CLARKE AT (239) 252-2526 OR EMAIL TO: Thomas.Clarke@CollierCountyFL.gov. INDIVIDUAL SPEAKERS WILL BE LIMITED TO 5 MINUTES UNLESS OTHERWISE WAIVED BY THE HEARING EXAMINER.PERSONS WISHING TO HAVE WRITTEN OR GRAPHIC MATERIALS INCLUDED IN THE HEARING REPORT PACKETS MUST HAVE THAT MATERIAL SUBMITTED TO COUNTY STAFF 10 DAYS PRIOR TO THE HEARING. ALL MATERIALS USED DURING PRESENTATION AT THE HEARING WILL BECOME A PERMANENT PART OF THE RECORD. ANY PERSON WHO DECIDES TO APPEAL A DECISION OF THE HEARING EXAMINER WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS PERTAINING THERETO, AND THEREFORE MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE, WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE BASED. DECISIONS OF THE HEARING EXAMINER ARE FINAL UNLESS APPEALED TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS. HEARING PROCEDURES WILL PROVIDE FOR PRESENTATION BY THE APPLICANT, PRESENTATION BY STAFF, PUBLIC COMMENT AND APPLICANT REBUTTAL. THE HEARING EXAMINER WILL RENDER A DECISION WITHIN 30 DAYS. PERSONS WISHING TO RECEIVE A COPY OF THE DECISION BY MAIL MAY SUPPLY COUNTY STAFF WITH THEIR NAME, ADDRESS, AND A STAMPED, SELF-ADDRESSED ENVELOPE FOR THAT PURPOSE. PERSONS WISHING TO RECEIVE AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF THE DECISION MAY SUPPLY THEIR EMAIL ADDRESS. 1. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 2. REVIEW OF AGENDA 3. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS: A. PETITION NO. PL20190002183 ASW– Hammock Park Apartments, LLC, requests a 137+/- foot waiver from the minimum required separation of 500 feet between facilities with fuel pumps for development of an automobile service station located at the northeast corner of CR 951 and Rattlesnake Hammock Road with a resulting separation distance of approximately 363 feet from the property line of an existing RaceTrac service station pursuant to Land Development Code Section 5.05.05.B of the Land Development Code. The property is in Section 14, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. [Coordinator: Timothy Finn, Principal Planner] Commissioner District 1 B. PETITION NO. PL20200002057 VA-Request for a variance from Section 4.02.03.D of the Land Development Code to reduce the required accessory structure side setback from 30 feet to 12.5 feet for a tennis court on Lot 5, Block G, Subdivision of Blocks E, F, G and H in Pine Ridge Subdivision, also known as 132 North Street, in Section 10, Township 49 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. [Coordinator: John Kelly, Senior Planner] Commissioner District 2 4. OTHER BUSINESS 5. PUBLIC COMMENTS 6. ADJOURN COLLIER COUNTY Collier County Hearing Examiner AGENDA Growth Management Department Conference Rooms 609/610 2800 Horseshoe Drive North Naples, FL 34104 March 11, 2021 9: 00 AM Andrew W. J. Dickman, Esq., AICP Hearing Examiner Note: Individual speakers will be limited to 5 minutes unless otherwise waived by the Hearing Examiner. Persons Wishing to have written or graphic materials included in the hearing report packets must have that material submitted to County staff at Alexandra. Casanovagcolliercountyfl.gov 10 days prior to the Hearing. All materials used during presentation at the hearing will become a permanent part of the record. Any person who decides to appeal a decision of the Hearing Examiner will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto, and therefore may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. Decisions of the Hearing Examiner are final unless appealed to the Board of County Commissioners. Hearing Procedures will provide for presentation by the Applicant, presentation by staff, public comment and applicant rebuttal. The Hearing Examiner will render a decision within 30 days. Persons wishing to receive a copy of the decision by mail may supply County staff with their name, address, and a stamped, self-addressed envelope for that purpose. Persons wishing to receive an electronic copy of the decision may supply their email address. Collier County Hearing Examiner Page I Printed 31312021 March 2021 Pledge of Allegiance Review of Agenda 3. Advertised Public Hearing A. PETITION NO. PL20190002183 ASW— Hammock Park Apartments, LLC, requests a 137+/- foot waiver from the minimum required separation of 500 feet between facilities with fuel pumps for development of an automobile service station located at the northeast corner of CR 951 and Rattlesnake Hammock Road with a resulting separation distance of approximately 363 feet from the property line of an existing RaceTrac service station pursuant to Land Development Code Section 5.05.05.B of the Land Development Code. The property is in Section 14, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. [Coordinator: Timothy Finn, Principal Planner] Commissioner District 1 B. PETITION NO. PL20200002057 VA -Request for a variance from Section 4.02.03.1) of the Land Development Code to reduce the required accessory structure side setback from 30 feet to 12.5 feet for a tennis court on Lot 5, Block G, Subdivision of Blocks E, F, G and H in Pine Ridge Subdivision, also known as 132 North Street, in Section 10, Township 49 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. [Coordinator: John Kelly, Senior Planner] Commissioner District 2 4. Other Business 5. Public Comments 6. Adjourn Collier County Hearing Examiner Page 2 Printed 31312021 3.A 03/11/2021 COLLIER COUNTY Collier County Hearing Examiner Item Number: 3.A Item Summary: PETITION NO. PL20190002183 ASW— Hammock Park Apartments, LLC, requests a 137+/- foot waiver from the minimum required separation of 500 feet between facilities with fuel pumps for development of an automobile service station located at the northeast corner of CR 951 and Rattlesnake Hammock Road with a resulting separation distance of approximately 363 feet from the property line of an existing RaceTrac service station pursuant to Land Development Code Section 5.05.05.13 of the Land Development Code. The property is in Section 14, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. [Coordinator: Timothy Finn, Principal Planner] Commissioner District 1 Meeting Date: 03/11/2021 Prepared by: Title: — Zoning Name: Tim Finn 02/22/2021 2:13 PM Submitted by: Title: Manager - Planning — Zoning Name: Ray Bellows 02/22/2021 2:13 PM Approved By: Review: Growth Management Operations & Regulatory Management Kenneth Kovensky Hearing Examiner (GMD Approvers) Diane Lynch Review Item Zoning Ray Bellows Review Item Zoning Anita Jenkins Review Item Hearing Examiner Andrew Dickman Meeting Pending Review Item Completed Completed 02/25/2021 12:00 PM Completed 02/25/2021 6:47 PM Completed 02/26/2021 9:42 AM 03/11/2021 9:00 AM Packet Pg. 3 3.A.a a Co ler County STAFF REPORT TO: COLLIER COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER FROM: GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT ZONING DIVISION — ZONING SERVICES SECTION HEARING DATE: MARCH 11, 2021 SUBJECT: PETITION ASW — PL20190002183 — 7-ELEVEN RATTLESNAKE & COLLIER Owner/Applicant: Agent: Hammock Park Apartments, LLC Alexis Crespo, AICP 7742 Alico Road Rich Yovanovich, Esq. Fort Myers, FL 33912 28100 Bonita Grande Dr. #305 Bonita Springs, FL 34135 REQUESTED ACTION: To have the Collier County Hearing Examiner (HEX) consider an application for a request of a 137+/- foot waiver from the minimum required separation of 500 feet between facilities with fuel pumps for development of an automobile service station located at the northeast corner of CR 951 and Rattlesnake Hammock Road with a resulting separation distance of approximately 363 feet from the property line of an existing RaceTrac service station pursuant to Land Development Code (LDC) Section 5.05.05.B. GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The subject property is located at the northeast corner of CR 951 and Rattlesnake Hammock Road in Section 14, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The subject property is located within the Hammock Park Mixed Use Planned Development (MPUD) and will be located at the northeast corner of CR 951 and Rattlesnake Hammock Road. The applicant is requesting a waiver of the separation requirements for automobile service stations from LDC Section 5.05.05.B to situate an automobile service station with convenience store and car wash. ASW-PL20190002183-7-Eleven Rattlesnake & Collier Page 1 of 6 Packet Pg. 4 3.A.a x O W o CL w OL U �w w �oU PO c� H = 00 4! � so 4 J ASW-PL20190002183-7-Eleven Rattlesnake & Collier a a FF O jll D 0 N 'IFF - w 4 ~ L7 w w [1 � J r [r d w [� Ow v w Page 2 of 6 M � V CL 0 J CO CO T— CN CD 0 0 CD O J L' CID E z C O q) Packet Pg. 5 3.A.a SURROUNDING LAND USE & ZONING: North: An undeveloped 9.5± acre parcel with a zoning designation of Good Turn Center PUD which allows 100,000 square feet of commercial land use and/or a variety of skilled nursing care facility uses with a maximum of 200 units. East: An undeveloped 19.32± acre parcel with a zoning designation of McMullen MPUD which allows 185,000 square feet of commercial and/or independent living, assisted living, and nursing home care units. South: An undeveloped 34.16± acre commercial parcel (which is part of a 2,262± acre DRI) with a zoning designation of Hacienda Lakes MPUD and a gross density of 0.78 dwelling units per acre. West: SFWMD 951 Canal, then CR 951, a 6-lane divided roadway, and a developed commercial strip shopping center with a zoning designation of Naples Lakes Country Club PUD and a gross density of 1.67 dwelling unit per acre. Aerial from Waldrop Engineering ASW-PL20190002183-7-Eleven Rattlesnake & Collier Page 3 of 6 Packet Pg. 6 3.A.a STAFF ANALYSIS: The Hammock Park MPUD is 19+/- acres in size and is currently vacant. The property was zoned CPUD per Ordinance 07-30 and most recently zoned MPUD per 2020-39 and is designated with the Urban Mixed -Use Activity Center #7 on the Future Land Use Map. The zoning and future land use allow for diverse and intensive commercial uses to serve the immediate area and Collier County as a whole. The MPUD allows for the development of up to 160,000 SF of commercial uses: or alternatively 80,000 SF of commercial uses and 265 multi -family apartment units. Gasoline services stations (SIC Group 5541) are explicitly permitted in the commercial tracts within the MPUD. The proposed automobile service station is proposed at the southwest corner of the MPUD, at the CR 951 and Rattlesnake Hammock Road intersection as shown on the attached Automobile Service Station Waiver Exhibit (see Attachment A). The Exhibit illustrates a fuel canopy along the CR951 frontage containing eight (8) pumps (16 fueling positions). The associated retail store is located in the eastern portion of the parcel. Immediately east of the store is a proposed carwash. The location of the store provides for effective screening of the carwash from CR 951 via the intervening building. Access will be provided through internal drives connecting the service station with the future commercial outparcel to the north within the MPUD. Further north, the overall MPUD will connect to CR 951 via the existing bridge being shared with the Good Turn CPUD. Additional access is provided directly to Rattlesnake Hammock to facilitate convenient access for westbound traffic leaving the Hacienda Lakes MPUD. A proposed 25-foot enhanced right-of-way buffers are provided along both CR 951 and Rattlesnake Hammock Road in accordance with LDC Section 5.05.05.E. Additionally, due to the recent approval of multi -family apartments on the eastern C/MU portion of the MPUD, a 30-foot wide residential buffer is provided to comply with the supplementary standards in LDC Section 5.05.05.D. The dumpster location is fully screened and will comply with the integrated design and color scheme of all principle structures on the site. The enclosed exhibit demonstrates the service station will comply with all design standards and regulations pertaining to automobile service stations to uphold the County's intent for aesthetically pleasing and highly functional gas stations to serve the residents and travelling public. A market study/needs analysis was submitted demonstrating the addition of the proposed gas station to the immediate market area will not adversely affect the balance of gasoline supply while addressing the demand coming from the future growth and make significant economic contributions to Collier County in terms of gas taxes, sales taxes and property taxes (see Attachment B). STAFF ANALYSIS OF WAIVER FROM SEPARATION REQUIRMENTS FOR AUTOMOBILE SERVICE STATIONS (ASW) CRITERIA The decision to grant the ASW is based on criteria in LDC Section 5.05.05.B.2.a.i - iv, in bold font below. Staff has analyzed this petition relative to these provisions and offers the following responses: ASW-PL20190002183-7-Eleven Rattlesnake & Collier Page 4 of 6 Packet Pg. 7 3.A.a i. Whether the nature and type of natural or man-made boundary, structure, or other feature lying between the proposed establishment and an existing facility with fuel pumps is determined by the BZA to lessen the impact of the proposed facility with fuel pumps. Such boundary, structure, or other feature may include, but is not limited to, lakes, marshes, nondevelopable wetlands, designated preserve areas, canals, and a minimum of a 4-lane arterial or collector right-of-way. There is a manmade boundary (CR 951) between the proposed automobile services station and the existing RaceTrac at the southwest corner of CR 951 and Rattlesnake Hammock Road. CR 951 is a six -lane arterial roadway with a 100+/-foot right-of-way width. The proposed automobile service station is also separated by the CR 951 canal, which provides another 100+/-feet of separation between the service stations. Thus, there is substantial separation and infrastructure that provide boundaries between the gas stations. ii. Whether the facility with fuel pumps is only engaged in the servicing of automobiles during regular, daytime business hours, or, if in addition to or in lieu of servicing, the facility with fuel pumps sells food, gasoline, and other convenience items during daytime, nighttime, or on a 24 hour basis The proposed automobile service station is a 24-hour operation providing food, gasoline, and other items. There is no automobile servicing or repair proposed. The site's location along an arterial roadway and adjacent to existing and planned commercial uses directly supports the proposed 24-hour operation to ensure compatibility. If residential uses are developed internal to the site in the C/MU tract to the east of the proposed service station, a 30' wide buffer will be provided as shown on the Automobile Service Station Waiver Exhibit. (See Attachment A) iii. Whether the facility with fuel pumps is located within a shopping center primarily accessed by a driveway, or if it fronts on and is accessed directly from a platted road right-of-way. The proposed automobile service station will be located in an outparcel within a MPUD. The station will be accessed from Rattlesnake Hammock, a county -maintained platted roadway, as well as the internal roadway network within the MPUD, that connects to CR 951 via an existing bridge just north of the Hammock Park MPUD boundary, within the Good Turn CPUD. iv. Whether the granting of the distance waiver will have an adverse impact on adjacent land uses, especially residential land uses. Buffers, lighting, architecture, and setbacks of the site design are intended to meet or exceed the enhanced code requirements for facilities with fuel pumps according to LDC Section 5.05.05. The only abutting residential development would be future apartments on the eastern portion of the MPUD (internal to the same project), which will be buffered in accordance with the LDC. There are no abutting residential uses, either existing or permitted, ASW-PL20190002183-7-Eleven Rattlesnake & Collier Page 5 of 6 Packet Pg. 8 3.A.a that are outside the Hammock Park MPUD boundary. Access is conveniently provided from both Rattlesnake Hammock Road and from CR 951 via an existing bridge north of the MPUD. COUNTY ATTORNEY OFFICE REVIEW: The County Attorney Office reviewed the staff report for this petition on 2/22/21. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Collier County Hearing Examiner (HEX) approve Petition ASW- PL20190002183, 7-Eleven Rattlesnake & Collier, for the request of a 137+/- foot waiver from the minimum required separation of 500 feet between facilities with fuel pumps for development of an automobile service station located at the northeast corner of CR 951 and Rattlesnake Hammock Road with a resulting separation distance of approximately 363 feet from the property line of an existing RaceTrac service station. Attachments: A. Auto Service Waiver Exhibit B. Market Analysis C. Application and Backup Materials ASW-PL20190002183-7-Eleven Rattlesnake & Collier Page 6 of 6 Packet Pg. 9 Y sstosu evxivas vtirvoe sve urns a,vav avxoav nuxvv avts _ '� ax 1E1IHXa xaniVnn aDIAIUS OinV g F px~�x,ax�xa„x�� 9NIa33N19N3 QI1dW NUVd'IDOWWVH I I I _ z I Ali rill z I'I I III o w o p o r I 1 1 zJ Z> rcN Uw I I U H w w ao K� ZK w2 N0 III a <=a I II a d�v I III I � i II _z II I 1 II I I I II II III I II II p I I I I I 1 I I II O i 3 �I �II I I i li o II O I i� i II IIi I a o odI 3� 1i IIII III I 1 iu O wE III a III I 2g I I I I Ili,! ll I al � III I I.'i.l 2 _ m¢ 33 r I ��11 w j al 1 7 w I I i t Q W J m 3 II N 11I f�'1I W Y 04 �I W a0 s ^I O w 0 I W w > a III aka al �II X W O Q N K Y i I O III COLLIER BLVD. O IL a IIi r Z I d N 2 I I Q U li Y �F III > i y i I Z w Z IIi I p> 0. li ZOD 01 W IIi 0 7 O F ; j N U o IIII Z UI'Z Z O J i y i l y xw III NOU NU iw — b � a o III I I I I II I II U ww ( p II II a �LL II I i III I II 5 IL2IIi O ~ II I I W � III I -..._.. oa wiz.... a�i ,n LL 1wwi oU 1. 1w 0 m o a omo pa ,----------- COLLIER BLVD (CR 951) --------- - -- -- ---- - L I � � I I w I ro O 2ZO r d O r Z w o w g > ZUr U m>W ui �co ni w,wn� �� aJ.- Z U Z Z 02 W z Of Z 2 O� ONU NU I 3.A.c I MARKET ANALYSIS FOR PROPOSED HAMMOCK PARK CONVENIENCE STORE/FUEL STATION ON COLLIER BOULEVARD IN COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA November 16, 2020 Prepared for Wilton Land Company, LLC C/O Mr. David Torres 7742 Alico Road Fort Myers, FL 33912 Prepared by /1 Planning— E—tion— Ft— It, Real Estate Econometrics, Inc. Real Estate Econometrics, Inc. Suite 100 707 Orchid Drive Naples, Florida 34102 (239) 269-1341 Ree-i.Com Packet Pg. 11 1 3.A.c Executive Summary Wilton Land Company LLC ("Applicant") is seeking approval for a proposed convenience store/fuel station ("Project") at the northeast corner of Collier Boulevard (CR 951) and Rattlesnake Hammock Road in Collier County's South Naples planning area. The Project will make a significant contribution to the Collier County economy while at the same time support the rapid growth in the Project's market area (defined in Section 1.1) without adversely affecting the efficient gasoline market economy in that market area. • Gasoline market demand is anticipated to grow 12.74% in the Project's drive time market area over the next five years. • The proposed convenience store/gas station will increase the same gasoline market drive time supply by 8.89%. The proposed Project will keep the drive time gasoline market efficient by providing the needed supply to accommodate the growing demand in Collier County's South Naples planning area. Background The Applicant is seeking to develop a 1.83-acre parcel of land that is a part of the 18.99-acre Hammock Park Commerce Center commercial planned unit development ("CPUD") and located at the northeast corner of Collier Boulevard (CR 951) and Rattlesnake Hammock Road in Collier County's South Naples planning area. The Applicant is proposing a convenience store/fuel station on the property. An amendment to the CPUD and a companion Growth Management Plan amendment was recently passed by the Collier County Commission for up to 265 apartment dwelling units within the CPUD. The existing CPUD ordinance indicates gasoline service stations are an allowable use, subject to the provisions of the LDC governing facilities with fuel pumps (LDC 5.05.05). The carwash is permitting within the CPUD as an accessory use to the gas station. There is currently no limit on the number of pumps noted in the CPUD ordinance. The CPUD does not have site development regulations that are specific to gas stations, therefore the requirements of Collier County LDC 5.05.05 will apply. Packet Pg. 12 3.A.c The Applicant proposes to construct a new 6,500 sf convenience store and free- standing fuel canopy with 8 MPDs (16 fueling positions) on an outparcel at the southwest corner of the parcel. A single bay self -serve automatic carwash is also proposed. Collier County Code requires 500 feet separation between gas stations and a RaceTrac gas station is located within 500 feet of the Project. Therefore, an Automobile Service Station Waiver ("ASW") is required. Along with a public hearing, the ASW also requires a gas station needs analysis for the Project. Real Estates Econometrics, Inc. ("Consultant") has been retained to analyze the fuel market for the Applicant. The Consultant is well -versed in preparing needs analysis studies especially in the Southwest Florida marketplace. This Study is comprised of three (3) parts; the market area demographics, the market analysis and conclusion. 1.0 Market Area Demographics 1.1 Market Area Definition Since the convenience store/fuel station market is being analyzed, it is appropriate to define the market area for such use by using a drive time calculation. Drive times are calculated by Environmental Systems Research Institute ("ESRI"). The ESRI Business Analyst mapping program is geographic information system -based ("GIS") that calculates market area drive times by actual street networks and posted speed limits and allows for the extraction of census data from that drive time market area. A March 1, 2017 study by the National Association of Convenience Stores ("NACS") on how consumers behave at the pump (See Appendix A) shows that consumers are attracted to convenience store/fuel station facilities based on a number of factors including: • Price • Location Convenience • Brand • Ease of ingress/egress 2 Packet Pg. 13 3.A.c As most consumers of a convenience store/fuel station facility are drawn to that facility based primarily on the four factors noted above, it would stand to reason that an immediate market area would include driving within 5-minutes to such a facility to obtain fuel. Most consumers would be fueling as a secondary action while driving for other reasons such as going to the grocery store or traveling to and from work. The above factors indicate that a convenience store/fuel facility market analysis would encompass a 5-minute drive time market area ("Market Area"). Figure 1.1.1 below depicts the Market Area for the Project. Figure 1.1.1 Source: ESRI ArcGIS Business Analyst Mapping System The Market Area configuration will change over time as growth occurs in the area and new roads with new residences are developed. That is important to note when the Market Area demographic detail is reviewed over the next five years in the next section. Packet Pg. 14 3.A.c 1.2 Market Area Demographic Detail In order to determine the convenience store/fuel station facility demand, a demographic profile of the Market Area is required. The Consultant utilized the Environmental Systems Research Institute's ("ESRI") geographic information systems ("GIS") both desktop and web -based. ESRI's Business Analyst on-line and ArcGIS desktop programs allow for the most current data collecting at the local level. Table 1.2.1 below shows the census -based demographic profile of the population that lives within the Market Area of the subject site. Table 1.2.1 esri emographic and income Profile Hammock Park Gas Station Prepared by Esrl 8510 Collier Blvd, Naples, Florida, 34114 Latitude: 26.11043 Drive Time: 5 minute radius Longitude:-81.68623 Summary Census 2010 2019 2024 Population 9,637 12,773 14,451 Households 4,808 6,218 7,010 Families 3,065 4,072 4,612 Average Household Size 1.96 2.02 2.03 Owner Occupied Housing Units 3,806 4,663 5,402 Renter Occupied Housing Units 1,002 1,555 1,608 Median Age 63.8 65.0 65.7 Trends: 2019 - 2024 Annual Rate Area State National Population 2.50 % 1.37% 0.77% Households 2.43% 1.31% 0.75% Families 2.52% 1.26% 0.68% Owner HHs 2.99% 1.60% 0.92% Median Household Income 4.21% 2.37% 2.70% 2019 2024 Households by Income Number Percent Number Percent <$15,000 376 6.0% 310 4.4% $15,000 - $24,999 494 7.9% 403 5.7% $25, 000 - $34,999 421 6.8% 357 5.1% $35, 000 - $49,999 1,019 16.4% 931 13.3% $50,000 - $74999 1,228 19.7% 1,313 18.7% $75, 000 - $99:999 847 13.6% 1,037 14.8% $100,000- $149,999 961 15.5% 1,297 18.5% $150,000- $199, 999 316 5.1% 512 7.3% $200,000+ 556 8.9% $50 12.1% Median Household Income $63,936 $78,558 Average Household Income $94,291 $114,935 Per Capita Income $45,419 $55,008 Census 2010 2019 2024 Population by Age Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent 0-4 310 3.2% 405 3.2% 446 3.1% 5-9 272 2.8% 362 2.8% 388 2.7% 10 - 14 241 2.5% 310 2.4% 348 2.4% 15 - 19 246 2.6% 308 2.4% 343 2.4% 20 - 24 268 2.8% 365 2.9% 383 2.7% 25 - 34 640 6.6% 880 6.9% 933 6.5% 35 - 44 614 6.4% 742 5.8% 843 5.8% 45 - 54 833 8.6% 921 7.2% 951 6.6% 55 - 64 1,635 17.0% 2,086 16.3% 2,278 15.8% 65 - 74 2,443 25.3% 3,524 27.6% 4,119 28.5% 75 - 84 1,607 16.7% 2,058 16.1% 2,547 17.6% 85+ 530 5.5% 811 6.3% 873 6.0% Census 2010 2019 2024 Race and Ethnicity Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent White Alone 8,685 90.1% 10,834 84.8% 11,930 82.6% Black Alone 514 5.3% 1,088 8.5 % 1,422 9.8% American Indian Alone 18 0.2% 26 0.2% 32 0.2% Asian Alone 69 0.7% 123 1.0% 168 1.2% Pacific Islander Alone 3 0.0% 3 0.0% 5 0.0% Some Other Race Alone 257 2.7% 532 4.2% 689 4.8 % Two or More Races 91 0.9% 166 1.3% 205 1.4% Hispanic Origin (Any Race) 1,220 12.7% 2,239 17.5% 2,933 20.3% Data Note: Income is expressed in current dollars. Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Census 2010 Summary File 1. Esn forecasts for 2019 and 2024. Source: ESRI and U.S. Census Bureau 0 Packet Pg. 15 3.A.c In 2019, the population for the Market Area is 12,773 and the number of households is 14,451. The majority of household incomes range from $35,000 to $150,000 and the median household income of the Market Area is $63,936. The average household income for this market area is $94,291. Table 1.2.2 below shows the workforce makeup of the Market Area. The workforce makes up 33.49% of the total market area population and will be significant contributors to the product sales of the convenience store/fuel station. The majority of the workforce is in the services industry and is white collar in occupation. Table 1.2.2 esri- Market Profile Hammock Park Gas Station 8510 Collier Blvd, Naples, Florida, 34114 Drive Time: 6 minute radii Prepared by Esri 5 minutes 2019 Employed Population 16+ by Industry Total 4,265 Agriculture/Mining 1.711. Construction 6.0°/ Manufacturing 1.8% Wholesale Trade 1.0% Retail Trade 15.5% Transportation/Utilities 1.2% Information 2.1% Finance/Insurance/Real Estate 5.4% Services 61.31A Public Administration 4.1% 2019 Employed Population 16+ by Occupation Total 4,266 White Collar 54.41A Management/Business/Financial 10.3% Professional 15.71A Sales 14.7% Administrative Support 13.7% Services 33.91/, Blue Collar 11.811, Farming/Forestry/Fishing 1.9 % Construction/Extraction 1.80/o Installation/Maintenance/Repair 3.3% Production 1.4 % Transportation/Material Moving 3.4% Source: ESRI and U.S. Census Bureau 1 Packet Pg. 16 3.A.c 2.0 MARKET ANALYSIS 2.1 Market Area Demand The Consultant next determined the market area demand for gasoline in 2019 and then over a 5-year period to 2024 in order to calculate the future demand for gasoline coming from the Market Area. Table 2.1.1 shows that the market area's 2019 population is 12,773 and the persons per household is 2.02 as taken from Table 1.2.1 and equates to a household count of 6,218 per ESRI. The household count is required since the annual amount spent on fuel in the Market Area is calculated on a per household basis. Table 2.1.1 Population 12,773 Persons Per Household 2.02 Households 6,218 Source: ESRI and U.S. Census Bureau In order to determine the 2024 population for the same Market Area, the Consultant then utilized the population projection from Table 1.2.1. The table and its forecasts are based on census data. Table 2.1.2 below shows that the Market Area population is projected to increase by 1,678 people between 2019 and 2024. Table 2.1.2 Year 5-Minute Drive Time Population 2019 12,773 2024 14,451 Increase: 1,678 Source: ESRI and US Census Bureau The next step in calculating the demand for gasoline from the Market Area is to determine the number of gallons of fuel consumed annually in the Market Area. The Consultant utilized the U.S. Census population data for the Market Area and combined it with the U.S. Census automotive expenditures data (Appendix B) and the Market Area average price to calculate the Market Area's annual consumption of gasoline. Table 2.1.3 on the next page shows the calculation. The Consultant made the same calculation for both 2019 and 2024 6 Packet Pg. 17 3.A.c Table 2.1.3 2019 2024 Population 12,773 14,451 Households 6,218 7,010 Average Amount spent on gas per Household $2,502.67 $2,502.67 Total Amount Spent in market area $15,561,602.06 $17,543,716.70 Average gasoline price per gallon (from Appendix C): $2.29 $2.269 Gallons Consumed Annually in Market Area: 6,795,459 7,661,012 Demand Increase from 2019 to 2024: 12.74% Source: ESRI, Automotive Aftermarket Expenditures, Consultant Field Study (Appendix C) The annual gallons of fuel consumed in the market area will increase by 865,552 which equates to a Market Area demand increase of 12.74% over the five-year period. 2.2 Market Area Supply In order to determine the impact the Project will have on the supply, the Consultant first needs to identify the existing gas stations in the Market Area, then calculate the number of cars using the existing gas stations on a weekly basis and finally determine the number of cars that would be using the Project's fuel to ascertain the percent growth the Project's supply will have on the total Market Area supply. The Consultant first used the same Market Area drive time to determine the number of competitive gas stations located within the boundaries of the Market Area. Figure 2.2.1 on the next page shows the competitive gas stations in light blue as they geographically relate to the Project location (red star). (Rest of Page Left Intentionally Blank) 7 Packet Pg. 18 3.A.c Figure 2.2.1 Source: ESRI, Collier County Property Appraiser, DOR List with Consultant Field Study (Appendix C) There are 12 gas stations within the Market Area boundary and all are convenience store/fuel stations. The list of the competitive stations, their makeup and photos are located in Appendix C. The Consultant then utilized NACS data to examine the supply side of the competition in the Market Area. The NACS 2015 Fuel Report (Appendix D, Page 30) along with the American Independent Business Alliance ("AMIBA") report (Appendix E, Page 2) points out that big box mass merchandise stores sell 278,000 gallons of gasoline per month and that amount is more than half of the amount sold by convenience store/fuel station locations. Based on that statistic, the Consultant used 270,000 gallons as a base amount and used 50% (135,000) of that amount as the average amount of gallons sold per month at a convenience store/fuel station location. There was no state, regional or local data available. From that point, the Consultant calculated the 12-station Market Area gallons sold during the weekday for a week. Table 2.2.1 on the next page shows that calculation. Packet Pg. 19 3.A.c Table 2.2.1 Station Gallons per Month: 135,000 Station Gallons per week: 33,750 Station Gallons for 5 weekdays: 24,107 Stations: 12 Market Area Gallons per 5-day week: 289,286 Source: NACS 2015 Fuel Report (Appendix D) and AMIBA Report (Appendix E) The Project's contribution in terms of total supply is then added to the Market Area total so that the number of cars per 5-day week could be determined. Table 2.2.2 below shows that calculation. Table 2.2.2 Market Area Gallons per 5-day week: 289,286 Project Contribution per 5-day week: 24,107 Market Area Gallons per 5-day week with Project: 313,393 Source: Consultant The next step is to calculate the number of gallons per week that is consumed per car in the marketplace. A cars per household statistic is required for this calculation. The Consultant utilized a study by Governing, a highly regarded media platform covering politics, policy and management for state and local government leaders (Appendix F). Each car uses 10.86 gallons per week in the Market Area. This calculation is shown in Table 2.2.3 below. Table 2.2.3 Drive Time Population 12,773 Drive Time Households 6,218 Annual Fuel Cost per Household $2,502.67 Cars Per Household (Appendix F) 1.78 Annual Fuel Cost per Car $1,405.99 Avg. Market Area Price per Gallon (Appendix C) $2.49 Annual Gallons Consumed per Car 564.66 Weeks per Year 52 Gallons Per Car Per Week 10.86 Source: ESRI, Automotive Aftermarket Expenditures, Consultant Field Study (Appendix C), Governing calculations of 2015 and 2016 one-year Census American Community Survey M Packet Pg. 20 3.A.c The next calculation is to convert the gallons per 5-day week to cars purchasing those gallons in the Market Area in order to compare to the cars per 5-day week as calculated by the Project traffic study that will purchase fuel at the Project. Table 2.2.4 shows that calculation. Table 2.2.4 Market Area Gallons per 5-day week with Project (from Table 2.2.2): 313,393 Gallons per car per week (from Table 2.2.3): 10.86 Cars per 5-day week in Market Area: 28,861 Source: Consultant The number of cars per 5-day week for the Project is the next calculation needed to compare the Project's contribution to the supply. Using the Project's traffic study (Appendix G) and a study performed by C-Store Shopper Insights (Appendix H), the Consultant determined that 1,918 cars will be purchasing gasoline at the Project's fuel stations over a 5-weekday period. Table 2.2.5 below shows that calculation. Table 2.2.5 Cars buying Gasoline at the Project during 5-Weekday period Weekday Per hour am (4 hours) Weekday Per hour pm (4 hours) Total Cars in per weekday: C-Store data: 69% cars in for gas Project cars buying gas over 5-weekdays: Per hour Total Cars in 100 400 86 344 744 69.00% 513 2,567 Source: Project Traffic Study (Appendix G), page 7. C-Store Shopper Insights, Page 1 (Appendix H) The Project's percentage of contribution to the Market Area supply is the last calculation. Table 2.2.6 below shows that the Project will contribute 2,567 fuel purchasers to the Market Area, equating to a Market Area supply increase of 8.89% Table 2.2.6 Market Area cars per 5-weekdays including Project (from Table 2.2.4): 28,861 Project cars per 5-weekdays (from Table 2.2.5): 2,567 Project Supply percent increase to the Market Area Supply: 8.89% Source: Consultant 10 Packet Pg. 21 3.A.c 2.3 Supply — Demand Analysis The final step in the Market Study supply -demand analysis is to put the supply and demand calculations together in order to determine the oversupply or undersupply of gasoline in the Market Area with the addition of the Project. Table 2.3.1 shows that over the next five years there will be a 3.85% deficit supply of gasoline to serve the Market Area over the next five (5) years. A basic economic principal states that all markets are efficient and that supply is for the most part generated as demand dictates. It is a rare economic situation where supply generates demand. This basic economic principal shows that markets are efficient in terms of supply and demand and the ultimate lack of available fuel station choices creates an impediment to the market functioning properly. The economic principal stated above would indicate that fuel station supply will be added to the Market Area in order to equalize the demand side of the Market Area's supply/demand equation. The Project will increase the Market Area's supply side by 8.89% thus stabilizing the Market Area's supply/demand equation for the next five (5) years. There will still be a 3.85% supply deficit in the next five (5) years even with the Project addition to the supply. Table 2.3.1 Market Area Demand Growth (Table 2.1.3) 12.74% Project percent of market (Table 2.2.6) 8.89% Market Area 5-year supply = surplus/(deficit) (3.85%) The addition of the Project will not only satisfy the increased demand over the next five (5) years, it will also keep gasoline prices reasonable by absorbing a majority of the five (5) year projected demand increase and not constraining the gasoline supply thus forcing gas prices to escalate. The Project will compensate for properties along the Market Area corridor that may not be developed as convenience store/fuel stations due to being unavailable for sale or subject to other development constraints. And the Project will be new to the market in terms of construction and exterior ambiance thus providing an upgrade to the Collier Boulevard development corridor and potentially force older gas station/convenience store competitors to upgrade their exterior and interior appearances. Packet Pg. 22 3.A.c 3.0 CONCLUSIONS 3.1 The Consultant used all of the data and analysis in the previous sections to determine the total supply and demand for gasoline sales in the Project's market area for the next five years. From there, the Consultant then determined the Project's impact on the Market Area in terms of the Market Area's percent of demand growth versus the Market Area's percent of supply increase with the addition of the Project's supply. The results show compellingly that the addition of the Project to the Market Area will not adversely affect the balance of gasoline supply while addressing the demand coming from the future growth and make significant economic contributions to Collier County in terms of gas taxes, sales taxes and property taxes. The Market Area is currently assumed to be in equilibrium as economic studies have shown that markets are efficient in terms of supply and demand and the future supply will be developed as the market grows and diversifies. The Project will help address the demand coming to the Market Area over the next five years. Based on the analysis, there will be even more of a gasoline supply need for the Market Area over the next five (5) years and beyond even with the addition of the Project. 12 Packet Pg. 23 3.A.c APPENDIX A 15 n q G Co a Packet Pg. 24 How Consumers Behave at the Pump I NACS Online — Your Business ... http://www.naesontine.comiYourBusiTiess/FuelsCenter/Bas Ask NACS Conexxus Terms of Use Advertise 1600 Duke Street About NACS Fuels Institute Privacy Policy For Suppliers Alexandria, Va 22314 Foundation Related Glossary Copyright @ 2017 NACS Associations THE ASSOCIATION FOR CONVENIENCE & FUEL RETAILING NAGS Online About Basics Articles Multimedia News Research Basics I Articles 1 How Consumers Behave at the Pump HOW CONSUMERS BEHAVE AT THE PUMP I Am Looking For: Search this site... p Nearly40 million Americans fill up their vehicles every day. How they drive, consider gas prices and determine whether they go inside the store has a profound impact on convenience stores. RELATED ARTICLES By MACS Pub€ished: 3/112017 10 A What Consumers Say About Ta s: Consumers; Pa at the Pum g Y p Fueling By NACS ,lead rvicre Nearly 40 million Americans fill up their vehicles every day. How they drive, consider gas prices and determine whether to shop inside a convenience store for food, snacks and beverages has a " . if', Are You Average? profound impact on the retail channel that sells 80% of the fuel purchased in the United States. Let's By NACS Read More look at some of the broad characteristics of how consumers buy gas and examine how convenience retailers can keep them coming back. In particular, we examine: Survey Says.._ By NACS Magazine Read More • Consumer behavior at the pump • What retailers can do to change consumer behavior • Overall driving habits !VACS has surveyed consumers about their perceptions related to gas prices since 2007 and has conducted monthly consumer sentiment surveys since 2013. NACS commissioned Penn, Schoen and Berland Associates LLC to conduct 1,114 online interviews with adult Americans on January 3-6, 2017. The margin of error for the entire sample is +1 2.95 % at the 95% Confidence interval and higher for subgroups. Below are the questions and overall responses. Consumer Behavior at the Pump Understanding how consumers feel about gasoline prices can help convenience retailers execute their marketing strategies- Its also important to determine how consumers buy gas, which reveals some interesting variations. Filling Up the Tank Consumers are more likely to buy gas during the evening rush than the morning daypart (36% vs. 22%), likely because of morning time pressures. But these time pressures vary by demographic. Those most likely to purchase fuel in the morning are consumers age 34-49 who generaily face time pressures related to organizing family activities, etc. There may be an opportunity to focus marketing on this segment to encourage more breakfast items. Meanwhile, those age 50 and older are most likely to purchase gas mid -day, outside of rush hours. A promotional campaign around slowing down and enjoying a snack or meal inside the store might appeal to this demographic. Q: What time of the day do you often purchase gas? I%) Gas Consumers 2017 Morning, or roughly 6 am to 10 am Mid -day, or roughly 10 am to 3 pm Age 18-34 35.49 50+ 22 19 28 21 32 27 25 41 Packet Pg. 25 How Consumers Behave at the Pump � NACS Online — Your Business — ... http://wwwnacsonline.com/YourBusiness/FuelsCenter/Ba3.A.c Afternoon, or roughly 3 pm to 7 pm 36 41 37 32 Night, or roughly 7 pm to midnight 9 13 10 6 Overnight, or roughly midnight to 6 am 1 0 1 0 Most fueling sites offer three octane grades: regular (usually 87 octane), mid -grade (usually 89 octane), and premium (usually 92 or 93 octane). Regular octane is the dominant fuel, while those who buy higher -octane fuels are likely doing so because their vehicle requires it There are some variations by age; younger consumers are the least interested in mid -grade as a fueling option. Q: What octane grade do you typically purchase for the vehicle you most commonly drive? (%) Gas Consumers 2017 Gender Age M F 18-34 35-49 50+ Regular 82 80 84 82 78 86 Mid -grade 8 10 7 5 11 5 Premium 8 10 7 11 10 5 Other 1 0 1 0 1 1 Don't know 0 0 1 1 0 0 Fully three quarters of consumers pay by plastic (73%). The percentage of consumers who pay by plastic has increased by 9 percentage points between 2009 and 2017. In reviewing subcategories, debit cards are most used by females (41 %) and those age 18-34 (45%). Credit cards are most popular with those age 50 and older (47%). Q: Which payment method do you typically use to purchase gas? Track (°!o) Gas Consumers 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2009 Cash 26 28 23 27 27 33 35 Credit 36 34 40 37 35 41 37 Debit 37 38 38 36 37 24 27 Total debit and credit 73 72 78 73 72 65 64 Shopping on Price The rise of mobile commerce, apps and price -checking webshes make it easier for consumers to shop for deals and "steals" on everything from appliances to new shoes, a mentality that also carries over to gasoline. Simply put, no matter what the price per gallon is, consumers want to find the best price they can. Approximately two in three consumers have consisterstty shopped on price, whether gas was as low as $1.62 per gallon at the start of 2009, or as high as $3.28 per gallon at the start of 2013. However, a focus on price is diminishing and has fallen 10 percentage points in just two years- Location has grown more important to consumers, as well as the in-store food offer. The price per gallon is least important to those who over the past 30 days who bought a sandwich at a place where they also purchased gas (56%). Q: When buying gas, which of the following factors is important to you? Track N Gas Consumers 2017 2016 2045 2014 2013 2012 2009 Price 61 64 71 66 71 63 70 Location of storelstation 25 20 18 20 18 20 19 Brand 8 9 8 8 8 8 9 Ease of entrance or exit 4 6 3 4 2 6 - Other 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 So how do price -sensitive consumers shop by price? The traditional gas price sign remains the most common method, particularly among drivers during the morning rush (65%). Loyalty cards are a second choice and are used by one in seven (16%) price -sensitive consumers. Packet Pg. 26 3.A.c APPENDIX B 16 n q G Co a Packet Pg. 27 ,c,� wWkAM Hammock Park Gas Station Prepared by Esr 8510 Collier Blvd, Naples, Florida, 34114 Latitude: 26.110< Drive Time: 6 minute radius Longitude:-81.6862: Demographic Summary 2019 2024 Population 12,773 14,451 Households 6,218 7,010 Families 4,072 4,612 Median Age 65.0 65.7 Median Household Income $63,936 $78,558 Payments on Vehicles excluding Leases Gasoline and Motor Oil Gasoline Diesel Fuel Motor Oil Other Vehicle Expenses Vehicle Maintenance & Repairs Vehicle Coolant/Brake/Transmission Fluids Tire Purchase/Replacement Vehicle Parts/Equipment/Accessories Vehicle Accessories including Labor Vehicle Cleaning Services including Car Washes Miscellaneous Auto Repair/Servicing Vehicle Body Work & Painting Vehicle or Engine Repairs Vehicle Motor Tune-up Lube/Oil Change & Oil Filters Vehicle Front End Alignment/Wheel Balance & Vehicle Shock Absorber Replacement Tire Repair and Other Repair Work Auto Repair Service Policy Vehicle Insurance Rental of Vehicles excluding Trips Leased Vehicles Basic Lease Charge for Cars/Trucks Car/Truck Lease Fees & Down Payments Vehicle Pers Property Taxes/State & Local Registr Fees Driver's License Fees Vehicle Inspection Fees Parking Fees & Tolls excluding Trips Parking Fees excluding Residence (Not on Trips) Tolls/Electronic Toll Passes excluding Trips Towing Charges Auto Service Clubs & GPS Services Spending Potential Index 114 113 154 136 117 123 130 124 127 102 97 118 117 129 116 131 104 111 140 114 110 100 98 117 127 109 114 80 79 81 94 126 Average Amount Spent $2,886.11 $82.85 $21.03 $1,338.57 $10.65 $233.38 $81.18 $15.21 $28.31 $154.01 $43.84 $289.75 $63.48 $137.89 $40.45 $15.92 $166.44 $58.05 $1,765.30 $61.25 $403.44 $351.42 $52.02 $239.80 $13.70 $18.00 $92.24 $45.23 $47.01 $6.26 $44.95 Total $17,945,805 $15,561,605 $515,149 $130,750 $8,323,245 $66,218 $1,451,163 $504,747 $94, 591 $176062 $957:656 $272,628 $1,801,650 $394,726 $857,418 $251,508 $98,986 $1,034,933 $360,960 $10,976640 $380:852 $2,508,618 $2,185,160 $323,458 $1,491,068 $85,215 $111,943 $573,551 $281,255 $292296 $38:949 $279,526 Data Note: The Spending Potential Index (SPI) is household -based, and represents the amount spent for a product or service relative to a national average of 100. Source: Esri forecasts for 2019 and 2024; Consumer Spending data are derived from the 2016 and 2017 Consumer Expenditure Surveys, Bureau of Labor Statistics. N Q L d O 0 oa d Y to C N N C N W ti N 0 W N N C Q d L m C N E t 0 R r Q a+ C E t V Q Packet Pg. 28 3.A.c APPENDIX C G Co Q Packet Pg. 29 3.A.c HAMMOCK PARK DRIVE TIME AREA COMPETITIVE CONVENIENCE STORES/FUEL STATIONS DOR Facilities Convenience Map ID Facilty Name Site Address Report Status Store MPDs Pumps 87 Octane 89 Octane 93 Octane 1 RaceTrac 8485 DAVIS BLVD OPEN YES 8 16 2.16 2.46 2.76 2 Circle K - Shell 8600 RADIO LN OPEN YES 3 6 2.16 2.53 2.80 3 Shell 3835 WHITE LAKE BLVD OPEN YES 6 12 2.16 2.53 2.80 4 Marathon 8901 DAVIS BLVD OPEN YES 8 16 2.39 2.89 3.09 5 Shell 3825 TOLLGATE BLVD OPEN YES 6 12 2.59 2.89 3.09 6 Mobil 8900 DAVIS BLVD OPEN YES 8 16 2.40 2.90 3.00 7 RaceTrac 8483 COLLIER BLVD OPEN YES 8 16 2.23 2.53 2.83 8 RaceTrac 11700 TAMIAMI TRL E OPEN YES 8 16 2.00 2.30 2.60 9 WaWa 12456 TAMIAMI TRL E OPEN YES 8 16 2.00 2.30 2.60 10 7-11 Mobile 12750 TAMIAMI TRL E OPEN YES 6 12 2.69 3.00 3.30 11 Circle K - Shell 12800 TAMIAMI TRL E OPEN YES 4 8 2.69 3.06 3.31 12 Murphy Oil 6630 COLLIER BLVD OPEN YES 8 16 1.96 2.26 2.56 81 162 $2.29 $2.64 $2.90 Packet Pg. 30 3.A.c RaceTrac 8485 Davis Boulevard 8 Stations — 16 pumps Map Location 1 87 Octane $2.16 89 Octane $2.46 93 Octane $2.76 Q Packet Pg. 31 3.A.c Map Location 2 Circle K - Shell 8600 Radio Road 3 Stations — 6 pumps VFW iT� Relft10 4 FO Y 9 87 Octane $2.16 89 Octane $2.53 93 Octane $2.80 a Packet Pg. 32 3.A.c Shell 3835 White Lake Boulevard 6 Stations — 12 pumps Map Location 3 87 Octane $2.16 89 Octane $2.53 93 Octane $2.80 a+ a Packet Pg. 33 3.A.c Marathon 8901 Davis Boulevard 8 Stations — 16 pumps Map Location 4 87 Octane 89 Octane 93 Octane $2.39 $2.89 $3.09 Packet Pg. 34 3.A.c Shell 3825 Tollgate Boulevard 6 Stations — 12 pumps Map Location 5 87 Octane 89 Octane 93 Octane $2.59 $2.89 $3.39 Packet Pg. 35 3.A.c Mobil Map Location 6 8900 Davis Boulevard 8 Stations — 16 pumps 8900 IP6 * , I M bil IJfessl M Mabll �b. 87 Octane 89 Octane 93 Octane $2.40 $2.90 $3.00 Packet Pg. 36 3.A.c RaceTrac 8483 Collier Boulevard 8 Stations — 16 pumps Map Location 7 87 Octane 89 Octane 93 Octane $2.23 $2.53 $2.83 Packet Pg. 37 3.A.c RaceTrac 11700 Tamiami Trail East 8 Stations — 16 pumps Map Location 8 87 Octane 89 Octane 93 Octane $2.00 $2.30 $2.60 Packet Pg. 38 3.A.c 12456 Tamiami Trial East 8 Stations — 16 pumps Map Location 9 87 Octane 89 Octane 93 Octane $2.00 $2.30 $3.60 Packet Pg. 39 3.A.c 7-11 Mobile 12750 Tamiami Trail East 6 Stations — 12 pumps Map Location 10 87 Octane 89 Octane 93 Octane $2.69 $3.00 $3.30 Packet Pg. 40 3.A.c Circle K - Shell 12800 Tamiami Trail East 4 Stations — 8 pumps Map Location 11 Is 87 Octane 89 Octane 93 Octane $2.69 $3.06 $3.31 a Packet Pg. 41 3.A.c Murphy Oil 6630 Collier Boulevard 8 Stations — 16 pumps Map Location 12 87 Octane 89 Octane 93 Octane $1.96 $2.26 $2.56 Packet Pg. 42 3.A.c APPENDIX D 18 n q G Co a Packet Pg. 43 3.A.c 2 Packet Pg. 44 3.A.c Major Oil Keeps Its Brand Presence While the major oil companies are withdrawing from retail operations, their brands remain. In fact, roughly half of retail outlets sell fuel under the brand of one of the 15 largest refiner -suppliers. Virtually all of these branded loca- tions are operated by independent entrepreneurs who have signed a supply contract with a particular refiner/distributor to sell a specific brand of fuel, but these retailers do not share in the profit/loss of their suppliers. The remaining 5o % sold "unbranded" fuel. These stations often are owned by companies that have established their own fuel brand (i.e., QuikTrip, Wawa, 7-Eleven) and purchase fuels either on the open market or via unbranded con- tracts with a refiner/distributor. Other Retail Channels Sell Fuels Convenience stores sell more than 8o% of the fuels purchased in the United States, and their dominance continues to grow. Over the past decade, the number of convenience stores selling fuels has grown by 15% (from i1o,895 to 127,588 stores). Meanwhile, the overall number of fueling locations has dropped. There were i52,995 total retail fueling sites in the United States in 2013, the last year measured by the now -defunct National Petroleum News' Market - Facts. This was a steep and steady decline since 1994, when the station count topped zo2,800 sites. Another channel also has seen growth over the past decade: big -box grocery stores and mass merchandising stores, otherwise known as "hypermarkets." As of May 2014, the 5,236 hypermarket retail fueling sites sold an estimated 13.8% of the motor fuels (gasoline) purchased in the United States, according to Energy Analysts International. These sites sell approximately 278,000 gal- lons per month, more than twice the volume of a traditional fuels retailer. The top five hypermarkets selling fuel, by store count: • Kroger (I,220) • Walmart (999 stations, mainly Murphy USA with small mix of others; up to zoo new Murphy USA sites are due by end of 2oi5 per agreement) • Sam's Club (5o5) • Costco (381) • Safeway (346) (Source: Energy Analysts International) The remainder of fuels sales in the United States comes from traditional ser- vice stations without convenience operations and very low -volume fueling sites, such as at marinas. 2015 NACS Retail Fuels R Packet Pg. 45 3.A.c APPENDIX E 19 n q G Co a Packet Pg. 46 be the fuel of choice for U.S. drivers. There ar?L9l!F79VM 1 t DRIVERS in the United States, and there are 122,000 CONVENIENCE that sell 8 0 % of the gasi sold in the country to keep U.S. 6 fueled up and on their way. Snapshot of the average U.S. driver: 33 Miles The average driver travels about 33 miles per day 0 ericans each day by Cdrivingcarpooling �P=06 ® 59% 30 Gallons of gas consume that price is the ma bou Ions consideration for wh per year they fuel up A in a ere A 44 o 5 /o also go inside the of gas customers convenience store to buy pay with a credit or food and beverages, or use debit card the ATM or restroom 52 Minutes The average driver commutes 26 minutes each way to/from work �R41-0 Fueled and on their way When do most Americans fill up? . HA- ruels Resource Center; U.S. Energy Information Administration; U.S. Census Bureau) NA S Fuels Resource Center Q Get an insider's view of ho, U.S. convenience storc keep millions of drivel filled up and on their way at conveni packet Pg. 47 3.A.c APPENDIX F 20 n q G Co a Packet Pg. 48 3.A.c 2726 OAK RIDGE COURT, SUITE 503 'A FORT MYERS, FL 33901-9356 TRANSPORTATION OFFICE 239.278.1906 Tr% CONSULTANTS , I N C FAX 239.278.906 TRAFFIC ENGINEERING TRANSPORTATION PLANNING SIGNAL SYSTEMS/DESIGN TRAFFIC IMPACT STATEMENT FOR GAS/CONVENIENCE STORE *RATTLESNAKE HAMMOCK & COLLIER COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA (MAJOR STUDY REVIEW - $1,500) (METHODOLOGY REVIEW FEE - $500) PROJECT NO. F2003.08 PREPARED BY: TR Transportation Consultants, Inc. Certificate of Authorization Number: 27003 2726 Oak Ridge Court, Suite 503 Fort Myers, Florida 33901-9356 (239) 278-3090 March 13, 2020 Packet Pg. 49 3.A.c TRANSPORTATION 7ATRCONSULTANTS, INC Table 3 Pass -by Trip Reduction Factors Gas/Convenience Store i a, Rattlesnake Hammock & Collier Land Use Percentage Trip Reduction Gasoline/Service Station With 50% AM/ PM Convenience Market 1 Table 4 Trip Generation — New Trips Gas/Convenience Store (ii Rattlesnake Hammock & Collier Land Use Weekday A.M. Peak Hour Weekft P.M. Peak Flour Daily (2-way) In Out Total In Out Total Super Convenience Market/Gas Station 200 200 400 171 171 342 3,881 (4,633 Sq. Ft. C-Store & 16 Re - Fueling Positions) Less 50% Pass -By -100 -100 1 -200 -85 -85 -170 1 -1,941 New Trips 100 100 200 86 86 172 1 1,940 The trips the proposed development is anticipated to generate as shown in Table 4 were then assigned to the surrounding roadway network. The new trips anticipated to be added to the surrounding roadway network were assigned based upon the routes drivers are anticipated to utilize to approach the subject site. Figure A-1, included in the Appendix of this report, illustrates the percent project traffic distribution and assignment of the net new project trips. Figure A-2, included in the Appendix of this report, illustrates the percent project traffic distribution and assignment of pass -by trips. Figure 2 illustrates the resulting assignment of all project related trips (net new + pass -by). V. PROJECTED CONCURRENCY In order to determine which roadway segments surrounding the site will be significantly impacted, Table 1A, contained in the Appendix, was created. This table indicates which roadway links will accommodate an amount of project traffic greater than the 2%-2%-3% Significance Test. The net new trips generated as a result of the proposed rezoning Page 7 Packet Pg. 50 3.A.c APPENDIX G 21 G Co Q Packet Pg. 51 Fueling Sales Inside and Out I CSP Daily News http://wwwcspdailynews.con!print/csp-magazinclarticle/fu INDUSTRY MEWS MERGERS & ACQUISITIONS FUELS DATA SPONSORED CONTENT EVENTS Beverages foodservice General Merchandise Services Snacks & Candy Tobacco MERCHANQIS[NG MADE EASY- .i for Torches & fuel all in one place. WHOLESALE PRICING Print, CSP Magazine July 2013 Am awn Fueling Sales Inside and Out An exclusive peek at latest VideoMining heat -map study reveals challenge of pump -to -store conversion, opportunity of layout. By Samantha oiler, Senior Editor/Fuels, CSP More than 25 years ago, pay at the pump debuted in the United States, introducing great convenience to motorists and a big conundrum to retailers_ If you enable customers to pay for fuel at the pump, how do you persuade them to come inside the store to buy higher -margin items? If recent research from VideoMiningCorp_ is any indication, it's a challenge that fuel retailers have still not mastered. "Sixty-nine percent of gas customers are just paying for gas and leaving, regardless of whether they are paying at the pump or prepaying [inside the store],"says Priya Baboo, executive vice president of shopper insights & strategy for Video -Mining Corp., State College, Pa., which produces the annual C-Store Shopper Insights (CSI) Program, a research effort that documents the c-store shopping trip. This fourth iteratian of the study, conducted in late summer 2012 and shared exclusively with CSP, included 10 chains representing 144 stores in 20 markets. Consider that for every 100 gasoline customers, 64 pay at the pump, and of the 64 pay only for gas and leave, according to Video Mining. Let's put aside this latter group —"It is much harder to convince someone who is just thinking of pumping gas to walk into the store, because they may be in a hurry;" Baboo says —and focus solely on the opportunity presented by the others. The 36 fuel customers who walk into the store to pay are truly "low -hanging fruit, "she insists, "because in the store you have a better opportunity of converting them. But unfortunately, we're not leveraging that opportunity." How poor is that leverage? Less than a third of these customers will ultimately make an in-store purchase_ Video Mining evaluates this type of c-store shopper behavior through a combination of technologies. Ceiling - mounted cameras track customers' movements through the c-store, while proprietary video -analysis software processes millions of hours of shopping trips. This data is cross-referenced with point -of -sale data to correlate store traffic with purchasing behavior and generate insights on everything from the basics (average time spent in store, average in-store basket) to the rates at which customers shopped particular categories and made a purchase_ Attr cusi grai $tom: Y !!kCASA l Today's Tc More New Engla Petroleum Mark, Packet Pg. 52 I 3.A.d I HEX PACKAGE HAMMOCK PARK MPUD WAIVER FOR SEPARATION REQUIREMENTS FOR AUTOMOBILE SERVICE STATIONS PL20190002183 Packet Pg. 53 I 3.A.d I ASW APPLICATION FORM El Q Packet Pg. 54 1 3.A.d Codier County ow ;Aft. COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 PETITION FOR WAIVER FROM SEPARATION REQUIREMENTS FOR AUTOMOBILE SERVICE STATIONS LDC subsection 5.05.05 B & Code of Laws section 2-83 — 2-90 Chapter 6 G. of the Administrative Code PETITION NO (PL) PROJECT NAME To be completed by staff DATE PROCESSED APPLICANT CONTACT INFORMATION Name of Applicant(s): Alexis Crespo, AICP & Rich Yovanovich, Esq. Address: 28100 Bonita Grande Dr. #305 City: Bonita Springs State: FL Telephone: 239-405-7777 Cell: n/a ZIP: 34135 Fax: 239-405-7899 E-Mail Address: alexis.crespo@waldropengineering.com & Ryovanovich@cyklawfirm.com Name of Owner(s): Hammock Park Apartments, LLC Address: 7742 Alico Road City: Fort Myers state: FL Telephone: Cell: E-Mail Address: david@torrescompanies.com PROPERTY INFORMATION Fax: ZIP: 33912 Provide a detailed legal description of the property covered by the application: (If space is inadequate, attach on separate page) Property I.D. Number: 00416720000 Section/Township/Range: 1126 Subdivision: Metes & Bounds Description: Unit: Lot: Block: Address/general location of subject property: Northeast corner of CR 951 and Rattlesnake Hammock Road BE AWARE THAT COLLIER COUNTY HAS LOBBYIST REGULATIONS. GUIDE YOURSELF ACCORDINGLY AND ENSURE THAT YOU ARE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THESE REGULATIONS. 6/3/2014 Page 1 of 4 Packet Pg. 55 COAT Count y 3.A.d COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 ZONING INFORMATION Current Zoning of subject property: MPUD Adiacent property information: Zoning Land Use N MPUD Commercial/Mixed Use S PUD ROW; Commercial E MPUD ALF W PUD ROW; Commercial WAIVER REQUEST DETAIL Please address the following waiver request details on an attached separate sheet: 1. What is the extent of the waiver being requested (in linear feet) from the required 500 foot separation? (NOTE: This measurement is the shortest distance between the nearest points of any two lots occupied by an Automobile Service Station, or for which a building permit has been issued.) 2. The Office of the Hearing Examiner may grant a waiver for part or all of the minimum separation requirements set forth in LDC subsection 5.05.05 B, if it is demonstrated by the applicant and determined by the Office of the Hearing Examiner that the site proposed for development of an Automobile Service Station is separated from another Automobile Service Station by natural or man- made boundaries, structures or other features which offset of limit the necessity for such minimum distance requirements. Staff's analysis and subsequent recommendation, and the Office of the Hearing Examiner's determination, are based on the following criteria as provided by LDC section 5.05.05 B. Please provide a narrative, on a separate sheet attached to this application, describing how the waiver complies with the criteria listed below to the extent you wish as it pertains to the proposed use. a. Describe the nature and type of natural or man-made boundary, structure, or other feature lying between the proposed establishment and an existing Automobile Service Station which may, as determined by the reviewing body, lessen the impact of the proposed service station. Such boundary, structure, or other feature may include, but is not limited to, lakes, marshes, nondevelopable wetlands, designated preserve areas, canals, and a minimum of a four -lane arterial or collector right-of-way. b. Whether or not the Automobile Service Station is only engaged in the servicing of automobiles during regular, daytime business hours, or if in addition to or in lieu of servicing, the station sells food, gasoline and other convenience items during daytime, nighttime, or on a 24-hour basis. c. Whether the Automobile Service Station is located within a shopping center primarily accessed by a driveway or if it fronts on and is accessed directly from a platted road right-of-way. d. Whether or not the granting of the distance wavier will have an adverse impact on adjacent land uses especially residential land uses. 6/3/2014 Page 2 of 4 Packet Pg. 56 COAT Count y 3.A.d COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Pre -Application Meeting and Final Submittal Requirement Checklist for: Waiver from Separation Requirements for Automobile Service Stations Chapter 6 G. of the Administrative Code The following Submittal Requirement Checklist is to be utilized during the Pre -Application Meeting, and at time of application submittal. At time of submittal, the checklist is to be completed and submitted with the application packet. Please provide the submittal items in the exact order listed below, with cover sheets attached to each section. Incomplete submittals will not be accepted. REQUIREMENTS FOR REVIEW COPIES REQUIRED NOT REQUIRED Completed Application (download from website for current form) ❑ ❑ ❑ Completed Addressing Checklist 1 ❑ ❑ Pre -Application meeting notes ❑ ❑ ❑ Conceptual Site Plan 24 in. x 36 in., along with one reduced copy 8 % in. x 11in. ❑ ❑ ❑ Warranty Deed 2 Q ❑ Affidavit of Authorization, signed and notarized 2 ❑ ❑ Environmental Data Requirements, if required 3 ❑ x❑ Aerial photographs 5 ❑ ❑ Electronic copy of all documents and plans *Please advise: The Office of the Hearing Examiner requires all materials to be submitted electronically in PDF format. 1 ❑ ❑ Letter of no objection from the United States Postal Service. Contact Robert M. Skebe at (239) 43S-2122. 1 ❑ ❑ Written Market Study Analysis El 0 ❑ *If located in the Bayshore/Gateway triangle Redevelopment Area, include an additional set of each submittal requirement ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PUBLIC HEARING PROCESS: • Following the completion of the review process by County review staff, the applicant shall submit all materials electronically to the designated project manager. • Please contact the project manager to confirm the number of additional copies required. 6/3/2014 Page 3 of 4 Packet Pg. 57 COAT Count y 3.A.d COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 PLANNERS — INDICATE IF THE PETITION NEEDS TO BE ROUTED TO THE FOLLOWING REVIEWERS: ❑ Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment: X ❑ Environmental Review: See Pre -Application Executive Director Meeting Sign -In Sheet ❑■ Addressing: Annis Moxam ❑ Graphics: Mariam Ocheltree ❑ City of Naples: Robin Singer, Planning Director ❑ Historical Review El Comprehensive Planning: See Pre -Application ❑ Immokalee Water/Sewer District: Meeting Sign -In Sheet ❑ Conservancy of SWFL: Nichole Ryan ❑ Parks and Recreation: Vicky Ahmad ❑■ County Attorney's Office: Heidi Ashton-Cicko ❑■ Transportation Pathways: Stacey Revay El Emergency Management: Dan Summers; ❑ School District (Residential Components): Amy and/or Heartlock EMS: Artie Bay ❑ Engineering: Alison Bradford ❑ Transportation Planning: John Podczerwinsky ❑ Other: ❑ Utilities Engineering: Kris VanLengen FEE REQUIREMENTS All checks payable to: Board of County Commissioners ❑ Pre -Application Meeting: $500.00 (to be credited towards the application fee if the application is filed within 9 months of pre -application meeting) ❑ Automobile Service Station Separation Requirement Waiver: $1,000.00 ❑ Estimated Legal Advertising fee for the Office of the Hearing Examiner or the BZA: $500.00 W11"A Agent/Owner Signature Alexis Crespo, AICP Applicant/Owner Name (please print) 11 /17/20 Date 6/3/2014 Page 4 of 4 Packet Pg. 58 I 3.A.d I COVER LETTER/ REQUEST NARRATIVE El E L Q C d E t V a Q Packet Pg. 59 3.A.d ' , ' ' BONITA SPRINGS Fort Myers Tampa Orlando Sarasota AIENGINEERING 28100 Bonua Grande Dr, Suile 305, Bonlla Springs, FL 34135 PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE p. (239) 405-7777 f. (239) 405-7899 HAMMOCK PARK MPUD AUTOMOBILE SERVICE STATION SEPARATION WAIVER NARRATIVE Request Wilton Land Company, LLC (Applicant) is requesting approval of Automobile Service Station Separation Waiver to allow for the development of convenience store, carwash, and 8 fuel pumps with 16 fueling positions within the Hammock Park Mixed Use Planned Development (MPUD). The proposed station is located at the northeast corner of CR 951 and Rattlesnake Hammock Road in unincorporated Collier County, Florida. The request requires approval of a waiver from the separation requirements for automobile service stations contained in Section 5.05.05 of the Land Development Code, as the proposed station will be within 363+/-feet of the property line of an existing Race Trac gas station at the southwest corner of CR 951 and Rattlesnake Hammock Road. II. Property Information The overall Hammock Park MPUD is 19+/- acres in size and is currently vacant. The Property is zoned MPUD per Ordinance 2020-39 and is designated with the Urban Mixed Use Activity Center #7 on the Future Land Use Map. The zoning and future land use allow for diverse and intensive commercial uses to serve the immediate area and Collier County as a whole. The MPUD allows for the development of up to 160,000 SF of non-residential uses; OR 80,000 SF if non-residential uses and 265 multi -family apartment units. Gasoline services stations (SIC Group 5541) are explicitly permitted in the commercial tracts within the MPUD. The overall MPUD has three (3) points of ingress/egress as shown on the approved PUD Master Plan, including two (2) points of access from Rattlesnake Hammock Road, and a third access to the north into the Good Turn CPUD, which provides for shared access to CR 951 via the existing bridge. III. Proposed Site Plan The proposed automobile service station is proposed at the southwest corner of the MPUD, at the CR 951 and Rattlesnake Hammock intersection as shown on the attached Automobile Service Station Waiver Exhibit. The Exhibit demonstrates a fuel canopy along the CR 951 frontage containing eight (8) pumps/16 fueling positions. The associated retail store is located in the eastern portion of the parcel. Immediately east of the store is a proposed carwash. The location of the store provides for effective screening of the carwash from CR 951 via the intervening building. Access will be provided through internal drives connecting the service station with the future commercial outparcel to the north within the MPUD. Further north, the overall MPUD will connect to CR 951 via the existing bridge being shared with the Good Turn CPUD. Additional access is provided directly to Rattlesnake Hammock to facilitate convenient access for westbound traffic leaving the Hacienda Lakes MPUD. Packet Pg. 60 3.A.d 25-foot enhanced right-of-way buffers are provided along both CR 951 and Rattlesnake Hammock Road in accordance with LDC Section 5.05.05.E. Additionally, due to the recent approval of multi- family apartments on the eastern C/MU portion of the MPUD, a 30-foot wide residential buffer is provided to comply with the supplementary standards in LDC Section 5.05.05.D. The dumpster location is fully screened and will comply with the integrated design and color scheme of all principle structures on the site. The enclosed exhibit demonstrates the service station will comply with all design standards and regulations pertaining to automobile service stations to uphold the County's intent for aesthetically pleasing and highly functional gas stations to serve the residents and travelling public. A market study/needs analysis is included in this submittal demonstrating the addition of the proposed gas station to the immediate market area will not adversely affect the balance of gasoline supply while addressing the demand coming from the future growth and make significant economic contributions to Collier County in terms of gas taxes, sales taxes and property taxes. IV. Waiver Criteria The following is a detailed analysis of this request's compliance with the variance review criteria set forth in LDC Section 5.05.05.2 a. Describe the nature and type of natural or man-made boundary, structure, or other feature lying between the proposed establishment and an existing Automobile Service Station which may, as determined by the reviewing body, lessen the impact of the proposed service station. Such boundary, structure, or other feature may include, but is not limited to, lakes, marshes, nondevelopable wetlands, designated preserve areas, canals, and a minimum of a four -lane arterial or collector right-of-way. RESPONSE: There is a manmade boundary (CR 951) between the proposed automobile services station and the existing Racetrac at the southwest corner of CR 951 and Rattlesnake Hammock Road. CR 951 is a six -lane arterial roadway with a 100+/-foot right-of-way width. The proposed automobile service station is also separated by the CR 951 canal, which provides another 100+/-feet of separation between the service stations. Thus, there is substantial separation and infrastructure that provide boundaries between the gas stations. b. Whether or not the Automobile Service Station is only engaged in the servicing of automobiles during regular, daytime business hours, or if in addition to or in lieu of servicing, the station sells food, gasoline and other convenience items during daytime, nighttime, or on a 24-hour basis. RESPONSE: The proposed automobile service station is a 24-hour operation providing food, gasoline and other items. There is no automobile servicing or repair proposed. The site's location along an arterial roadway and adjacent to existing and planned commercial uses directly supports the proposed 24-hour operation to ensure compatibility. If residential uses are developed internal to the site in the C/MU tract to the east of the proposed service station, a 30' wide buffer will be provided as shown on the Waiver Exhibit. 2 of 3 Packet Pg. 61 3.A.d c. Whether the Automobile Service Station is located within a shopping center primarily accessed by a driveway or if it fronts on and is accessed directly from a platted road right-of-way. RESPONSE: The proposed automobile service station will be located in an outparcel within a MPUD. The station will be accessed from Rattlesnake Hammock, a county -maintained platted roadway, as well as the internal roadway network within the MPUD, that connects to CR 951 via an existing bridge just north of the Hammock Park MPUD boundary, within the Good Turn CPUD. d. Whether or not the granting of the distance wavier will have an adverse impact on adjacent land uses especially residential land uses. NARRATIVE: Buffers, lighting, architecture, and setbacks of the site design are intended to meet or exceed the enhanced code requirements for facilities with fuel pumps according to LDC Section 5.05.05 The only abutting residential development would be future apartments on the eastern portion of the MPUD (internal to the same project), which will be buffered in accordance with the LDC. There are no abutting residential uses, either existing or permitted, that are outside the Hammock Park MPUD boundary. Access is conveniently provided from both Rattlesnake Hammock Road and from the CR 951 via an existing bridge north of the MPUD. V. Conclusion In conclusion, the Applicant's request will allow for an automobile service station at the northeast corner of CR 951 and Rattlesnake Hammock Road, and within 360 feet of an existing Race Trac at the southwest corner of the intersection. The service stations will be separated by the significant CR 951 right-of-way and canal system and are on opposite sides of the road. The proposed station will facilitate convenient access to fuel for northbound traffic along CR 951 and westbound traffic along Rattlesnake Hammock Road. All enhanced and supplementary standards set forth in LDC Section 5.05.05 will be met by the proposed design. The Applicant has demonstrated market demand for the station based upon a detailed needs analysis. For these reasons, the Applicant respectfully requests approval of this Automobile Service Station Waiver. 3 of 3 Packet Pg. 62 I 3.A.d I ADDRESSING CHECKLIST El E L Q C d E t V a Q Packet Pg. 63 Collier County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 252-5724 ADDRESSING CHECKLIST Please complete the following and email to GMD_Addressing@colliergov.net or fax to the Operations Division at 239-252-5724 or submit in person to the Addressing Section at the above address. Form must be si , n�Y Addressing personnel prior to pre -application meeting, please allow 3 days for processing. Not all items will apply to every project. Items in bold type are required. FOLIO NUMBERS MUST BE PROVIDED. Forms older than 6 months will require additional review and approval by the Addressing Section. PETITION TYPE (Indicate type below, complete a separate Addressing Checklist for each Petition type) ❑ BL (Blasting Permit) ❑ SDP (Site Development Plan) ❑ BD (Boat Dock Extension) ❑ SDPA (SDP Amendment) ❑ Carnival/Circus Permit ❑ SDPI (Insubstantial Change to SDP) ❑ CU (Conditional Use) ❑ SIP (Site Improvement Plan) ❑ EXP (Excavation Permit) ❑ SIPI (Insubstantial Change to SIP) ❑ FP (Final Plat ❑ SNR (Street Name Change) ❑ LLA (Lot Line Adjustment) ❑ SNC (Street Name Change — Unplatted) ❑ PNC (Project Name Change) ❑ TDR (Transfer of Development Rights) ❑ PPL (Plans & Plat Review) ❑ VA (Variance) ❑ PSP (Preliminary Subdivision Plat) ❑ VRP (Vegetation Removal Permit) ❑ PUD Rezone ❑ VRSFP (Vegetation Removal & Site Fill Permit) ❑ RZ (Standard Rezone) Fol OTHER AUTO SERVICE WAIVER (ASW) LEGAL DESCRIPTION of subject property or properties (copy of lengthy description may be attached) 14 50 26 S1/2 OF SW114 OF SW1/4 LESS R/W, AND W80FT OF S1/2 OF SE1/4 OF SW1/4, LESS THAT PORTION FOR R/W AS DESC IN OR 4336 PG 3681, AND N30FT OF N1/2 OF NW1/4 OF NW1/4 OF SEC 23-50-26 LESS R/W FOLIO (Property ID) NUMBER(s) of above (attach to, or associate with, legal description if more than one) 416720000 STREET ADDRESS or ADDRESSES (as applicable, if already assigned) 8530 COLLIER BLVD LOCATION MAP must be attached showing exact location of project/site in relation to nearest public road right- of-way • SURVEY (copy -needed only for unplatted properties) CURRENT PROJECT NAME (if applicable) ATION PROPOSED PROJECT NAME (if applicable) HAMMOCK PARK AUTOMOBILE SERVICE STATION (Not approved at this time) PROPOSED STREET NAMES (if applicable) N/A SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN NUMBER (for existing projects/sites only) SDP - or AR or PL # PL20190002183 (PUDA) Rev. 6/9/2017 1 Packet Pg. 64 46- Collier County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 252-5724 Project or development names proposed for, or already appearing in, condominium documents (if application; indicate whether proposed or existing) N/A Please Return Approved Checklist By: [�] Email Applicant Name: ALEXIS CRESO Phone: 239-850-8525 ❑ Fax ❑ Personally picked up Email/Fax: ALEXIS.CRESPO@ LDROPENGINEERING.COM Signature on Addressing Checklist does not constitute Project and/or Street Name approval and is subject to further review by the Operations Division. FOR STAFF USE ONLY Folio Number 416720000 Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number l�O 11 /09/2020 Approved by: Date. Updated by: Date: IF OLDER THAN 6 MONTHS, FORM MUST BE UPDATED OR NEW FORM SUBMITTED Rev. 6/9/2017 1 Packet Pg. 65 / � a • � , J • yy -r 114T'•1� a+r+l► y` W �. l Ashy .1. i Jj ' I Wm- _ -- - Aw 1°r d ke :`� •�� yam:. ��: st WL Ilk :4,� dt ©� o = DoI ff 77 OCJo QGua �0�3 �r n, u u MWALDROP <«6Y1Cd;R, Hammock Park I 3.A.d I PRE - APPLICATION MEETING NOTES El E L Q C d E t V a Q Packet Pg. 67 Coiner County 3.A.d COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 Pre -Application Meeting Notes Petition Type: Date and Time: ASW Wednesday, 10/2/19,11:00 A.M. Assigned Planner: Gilbert Martinez Engineering Manager (for PPL's and FP's): Project Information Project Name: 7-Fleven Rattlesnake Hammock & Collier (ASW) PL#: PL20190002183 Property ID #: 4168530720000 Current Zoning: CPUD Project Address: Collier Blvd City: Naples State: FL Applicant: Sharon Hrabak, Quattrone & Associates, inc Zip: 34114 Quattrone & Assoczates,Inc Agent Name: M • Salberg & A. Quattrone phone: (239) 936-5222 4301 Veronica Fort Agent/Firm Address: Shoemaker Blvd City: Meyers State: FL Zip: 33 916 Property Owner: Wilton Land Company, LLC Please provide the following, if applicable: i. Total Acreage: ii. Proposed # of Residential Units: iii. Proposed Commercial Square Footage: iv. For Amendments, indicate the original petition number: V. If there is an Ordinance or Resolution associated with this project, please indicate the type and number: vi. If the project is within a Plat, provide the name and AR#/PL#: Updated 7/11/2019 Page 1 1 of 5 Packet Pg. 68 Co*er County 3.A.d COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 Meeting Notes As of 10/16/2017 all Zoning applications have revised applications, and your associated Application is included in your notes; additionally a *new Property Ownership Disclosure Form is required for all applications. A copy of this new form is included in your pre-app Note — link is https://www.colliergov.net/Home/ShowDocument?id=75093. ( r:,,.dE IE�vti1.�+tN tq[, pA �4 FtueLS MAP ,N�, Li5-(eJ SpccieS 5vru s - %a Pre Sr-Tir- Q� 1C.rz., r1�CN A'DDseS Co, P i �r4+JC c 1%) .. f h CC ME O b 1,ee- 11 v E o,JF iZM 4kE Loci,{ic,►dF IJe I S O tv i k E Prc f14 A+-Jd (_QAQr,A� L D C 0 Chect157 If Site is within the City of Naples Water Service Area please send to Naples Utilities and Planning Departments. Then, if the petition is submitted, we are to send it (by email) to the four persons below in their Utilities and Planning Depts. - along with a request that they send us a letter or email of "no objection" to the petition. Bob Middleton RMiddleton(oDnaplesgov.com Allyson Holland AMHollandici..naplesgov.com Robin Singer RSinaer(cVnaplesaov.com Erica Martin emartinRnaplescloy.com Disclaimer. Information provided by staff to applicant during the Pre -Application Meeting is based on the best available data at the time of the meeting and may not fully inform the applicant of issues that could arise during the process. The Administrative Code and LDC dictates the regulations which all applications must satisfy. Any checklists provided of required data for an application may not fully outline what is needed. It is the applicant's responsibility to provide all required data. Updated 7/11/2019 Page 1 2 of 5 Packet Pg. 69 Cot r County 3.A.d COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net w^is.,A .ue d Meeting Notes %4 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 l% /� . �o .• t �s�4 i!rY� O T C 3, c z r✓i � T 1 / a -A �- 145�J_ Other required documentation for submittal (not listed on application): Disclaimer: Information provided by staff to applicant during the Pre -Application Meeting is based on the best available data at the time of the meeting and may not fully inform the applicant of issues that could arise during the process. The Administrative Code and LDC dictates the regulations which all applications must satisfy. Any checklists provided of required data for an application may not fully outline what is needed. It is the applicant's responsibility to provide all required data. Updated 7/11/2019 Page 1 3 of 5 Packet Pg. 70 Co*er County 3.A.d COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 Pre -Application Meeting Sign -In Sheet PL# PL20190002183 Collier County Contact Information: Name Review Discipline Phone Email ❑ David Anthony Environmental Review 252-2497 david.anthony@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Claudine Auclair GMD Operatfons and Regulatory Management 252-5887 Claudine.auclair@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Sally Ashkar Assistant County Attorney 252-8842 sally.ashkar@coliiercountyfl.gov ❑ Steve Baluch Transportation Planning 252-2361 Stephen.baluch@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Ray Bellows Zoning, Planning Manager 252-2463 raymond.bellows@colliercountyfl.gov ❑,Laurie Beard PUD Monitoring 252-5782 laurre.beard @colliercountyfLgov Craig Brown Environmental Specialist 252-2548 craig.brown@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Alexandra Casanova Operations Coordinator 252-2658 Alexandra.Casanova @colliercountyfLgov Heidi Ashton Cicko Managing Asst. County Attorney 252-8773 1 heidi.ashton@colliercountyfl.gov Thomas Clarke Operations Coordinator 252-2584 1 thomas.Clarke@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Jamie Cook Prin. Environmental Specialist 252-6290 4me.cook@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Eric Fey, P.E. Utility Planning 252-1037 eric.fey@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Tim Finn, AICP Zoning Division 252-4312 timothy.finn@colliercountyfLgov ❑ Sue Faulkner Comprehensive Planning 252-5715 sue.faulkner@colliercountyflgov Jeremy Frantz LDC Manager 252-2305 Jeremy.Frantz@colliercountyfl.gov l James French Growth Management Deputy Department Head 252-S717 james.french@colliercountyfl.gov CI Michael Gibbons Structural/Residential Plan Review 252-2425 michael.gibbons@coiliercountyfl.gov ❑ Storm Gewirtz, P.E. Engineering Stormwater 252-2434 storm.gewirtz@collie rcountyfLgov Nancy Gundlach, AICP, PLA Zoning Division 252-2484 nancy.gundlach@colliercountyfl.gov Richard Henderlong Principal Planner 252-2464 rchard.henderiong@colliercountyfl.gov C John Houldsworth Engineering Subdivision 252-5757 iohn.houldsworth@colliercountyfl.gov C Alicia Humphries Right -Of -Way Permitting 252-2326 alicia.humphries@colliercountyfl.gov C Erin losephitis Environmental Specialist, Senior 252-2915 1 erin,josephitis@colliercountyfl.gov C Marcia Kendall Comprehensive Planning 252-2387 marcia.kendall@colliercountyfLgov John Kelly Zoning Senior Planner 252-5719 john.kelly@colliercountyfl.gov C Diane Lynch Operations Analyst 252-8243 diane.lynch@colliercountyfl.gov Gil Martinez Zoning Principal Planner 252-4211 gilbert.martinez@colliercountyfl.gov Thomas Mastroberto Greater Naples Fire 252-7348 thomas.mastroberto@colliercountyfLgov Updated 7/11/2019 Page 1 4 of 5 Packet Pg. 71 Ca*er Count y 3.A.d COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.calliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 2S2-2400 ❑ Jack McKenna, P.E. Engineering Services 252-2911 jack. mckenna@col liercountyfLgov F7 Matt McLean, P.E. Development Review Director 252-8279 matthew.mclean@colliercountyfl.gov Michele Mosca, AICP Capital Project Planning 252-2466 michele.mosca@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Annis Moxam Addressing 252-5519 annis.moxam@colliercountyfl.gov Richard Orth Stormwater Planning 252-5092 richard.orth@colliercountyfl.gov Brandy Otero Transit 252-5859 brandy.otero@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Brandi Pollard Utility Impact fees 252-6237 brandi.pollard@coliiercountyfl.gov ❑' Todd Riggall North Collier Fire 597-9227 triggall@northcollierfire.com ❑ Brett Rosenblum, P.E. Development Review Principal Project Manager 252-2905 brett.rosenblum@colliercountyfl,gov ❑ James Sabo, AICP Zoning Principal Planner 252-2708 james.sabo@colliergo.net Michael Sawyer Transportation Planning 252-2926 michael.sawyer@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Corby Schmidt, AICP Comprehensive Planning 252-2944 corby.schmidt@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Chris Scott, AICP Development Review - Zoning 252-2460 chris.scott@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Linda Simmons North Collier Fire 252-2311 Linda.Simmons@coliiercountyfl.gov ❑ Peter Shawinsky Architectural Review 252-8523 peter.shawinsky@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Camden Smith Zoning Operations Manager 252-1042 Camden.smith@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Mark Strain Hearing Examiner/CCPC 252-4446 mark.strain@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Mark Templeton Landscape Review 252-2475 mark.templeton@colliercountyfl.gov ❑ Jessica Velasco Zoning Division Operations 252-2584 jessica.velasco@coliiercountyfl.gov ❑ Jon Walsh, P.E. Building Review 252-2962 jonathan.walsh@colliercountyfl.gov L David Weeks, AICP Comprehensive Planning Future Land Use Consistency 252-2306 david.weeks@colliercountyfl.gov L Kirsten Wilkie Environmental Review Manager 252-5518 kirsten.wilkie@colliercountyfl.gov [ Christine Willoughby Development Revfew - Zoning 252-5748 Christine.wilioughby@colliercountyfl.gov Daniel Zunzunegui North Collier Fire 252-2310 Daniel.Zunzunegui@colliercountyfl.gov Additional Attendee Contact Information: Name Representing Phone Email 7e-0 (� Yzv-ns yet {?A7--1 1�M5mc'h fyL LeVc-r� �F� C,1rr�� h f �t�2<!, G• O! Updated 7/11/2019 Page ! 5 of 5 Packet Pg. 72 3.A.d Environmental Data Checklist Project Name 1 r �le�J 1 �Cl �FPSClGJ1L� Th 'Y) Y)Q(k +CQ1 I I'F' The Environmental Data requirements can be found in LDC Section 3.08.00 I. Provide the EIS fee if PUD or CU. � . WHO AND WHAT COMPANY PREPARED THE ENVIRONMENTAL DATA REPORT? Preparation of Environmental Data, Environmental Data Submittal Requirements shall be prepared by an individual with academic credentials and experience in the area of environmental sciences or natural resource management. Q Academic credentials and experience shall be a bachelor's or higher degree in one of the biological sciences with at least two years of ecological or biological professional experience in the State of Florida. Please include o revision dates on resubmittals. 0 06 3. Identify on a current aerial, the location and acreage of all SFWMD jurisdictional wetlands according to the 4, Florida Land Use Cover and Forms Classification System (FLUCFCS) and include this information on the SDI y or final plat construction plans. Wetlands must be verified by the South Florida Water Management Distric' (SFWMD) or Florida Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) prior to SDP or final plat constructior tcc plans approval. For sites in the RFMU district, provide an assessment in accordance with 3.05.07 F and identif c on the FLUCFCS map the location of all high quality wetlands (wetlands having functionality scores of at lean m 0.65 WRAP or 0.7 UMAM) and their location within the proposed development plan. Sites with high qualit3 w wetlands must have their functionality scores verified by the SFWMD or DEP prior to first development order approval. Where functionality scores have not been verified by either the SFWMD or DEP, scores must be cm reviewed and accepted by County staff, consistent with State regulation. to 4. SDP or final plat construction plans with impacts to five (5) or more acres of wetlands shall provide an analysi! 2 of potential water quality impacts of the project by evaluating water quality loadings expected from the project - (post development conditions considering the proposed land uses and stonnwater management controls; compared with water quality loadings of the project area as it exists in its pre -development conditions. The analysis shall be performed using methodologies approved by Federal and State water quality agencies, and muse demonstrate no increase in nutrients (nitrogen and phosphorous) loadings in the post development scenario. 0 5. Where treated stormwater is allowed to be directed into preserves, show how the criteria in 3.05.07 H have beer met. 6. Where native vegetation is retained on site, provide a topographic map to a half foot and, where possible, provide elevations within each of the FLUCFCS Codes identified on site. For SDP or final plat construction plans, include this information on the site plans. Provide when treated stormwater is being directed into preserves (45 above). 7. ' Provide a wildlife survey for the nests of bald eagle and for listed species known to inhabit biological communities similar to those existing on site. The survey shall be conducted in accordance with the guidelines or recommendations of the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FFWCC) and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). Survey times may be reduced or waived where an initial habitat assessment by the environmental consultant indicates that the likelihood of listed species occurrence is low, as determined by the FFWCC and USFWS. Where an initial habitat assessment by the environmental consultant indicates that the likelihood of listed species occurrence is low, the survey time may be reduced or waived by the County Manager or designee, when the project is not reviewed or technical assistance not provided by the FFWCC and USFWS, Additional survey time may be required if listed species are discovered (8 Provide a survey for listed plants identified in 3.04.03 9. Wildlife habitat management and monitoring plans in accordance with 3.04.00 shall be required where lister species are utilizing the site or where wildlife habitat management and monitoring plans are required by the FFWCC or USFWS. These plans shall describe how the project directs incompatible land uses away from lister_ Packet Pg. 73 3.A.d species and their habitats. Identify the location of listed species nests, burrows, dens, foraging areas, and the location of any bald eagle nests or nest protection zones on the native vegetation aerial with FLUCFCS overix, for the site. Wildlife habitat management plans shall be included on the SDP or final plat construction plans. Bali eagle management plans are required for sites containing bald eagle nests or nest protection zones, copies o which shall be included on the SDP or final plat construction plans. Note. Not required at time of Land use petitions except for Bald Eagle Management Plans. Staff request management plans for other species are only provided at time of Plat or SDP. 10. For sites or portions of sites cleared of native vegetation or in agricultural operation, provide documentation that the parcel(s) were issued a permit to be cleared and are in compliance with the 25 year rezone limitation pursuan' < to section 10.02.06. For sites permitted to be cleared prior to July 2003, provide documentation that the parcel(s) are in compliance with the 10 year rezone limitation previously identified in the GMP. Criteria defining native o vegetation and determining the legality, process and criteria for clearing are found in 3.05.05, 3.05.07 and v 10.02.06. 06 a) I I Identify on a current aerial the acreage, location and community types of all upland and wetland habitats on th N project site, according to the Florida Land Use Cover and Forms Classification System (FLUCFCS), and provid; a legend for each of the FLUCFCS Codes identified. Aerials and overlay information must be legible at the scab provided. c & Provide descriptions of each FLUCFCS code w Provid calculations for the acreage of native vegetation required to be retained on -site. Demonstrate on map. N b. Provide a companion chart. r Include the above referenced calculations and aerials on the SDP or final plat construction plans. w 12. Include on a separate site plan, the project boundary and the land use designations and overlays for the RLSA RFMU, ST and ACSC-ST districts. Include this information on the SDP or final plat construction plans 13. Where off -site preservation of native vegetation is proposed in lieu of on -site, demonstrate that the criteria in section 3.05.07 have been met and provide a note on the SDP or final plat construction plans indicating the type of donation (monetary payment or land donation) identified to satisfy the requirement. Include on the SDP or final plat construction plans, a location map(s) and property identification number(s) of the off -site parcel(s) if off -site donation of land is to occur. 14. Provide the results of any Environmental Assessments and/or Audits of the property, along with a narrative of thi measures needed to remediate if required by FDEP. 15. Soil and/or ground water sampling shall be required at the time of first development order submittal for sites that occupy farm fields (crop fields, cattle dipping ponds, chemical mixing areas), golf courses, landfill or junkyards or for sites where hazardous products exceeding 250 gallons of liquid or 1,000 pounds of solids were stored or processed or where hazardous wastes in excess of 220 pounds per month or 110 gallons at any point in time were generated or stored_ The amount of sampling and testing shall be determined by a registered professional with experience in the field of Environmental Site Assessment and shall at a minimum test for organochlorine pesticides (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 8081) and Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) 8 metals using Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) soil sampling Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) FS 3000, in areas suspected of being used for mixing and at discharge point of water management system. Sampling should occur randomly if no points of contamination are obvious. Include a background soil analysis from an undeveloped location hydraulically upgradient of the potentially contaminated site. Soil sampling should occur just below the root zone, about 6 to 12 inches below ground surface or as otherwise agreed upon with the registered professional with experience in the field of Environmental Site Assessment. Include in or with the Environmental Site Assessment, the acceptable State and Federal pollutant levels for the types of contamination found on site and indicate in the Assessment, when the contaminants are over these levels. if this analysis has been done as part of an Environmental Audit then the report shall be Packet Pg. 74 3.A.d submitted. The County shall coordinate with the FDEP where contamination exceeding applicable FDEP standards is identified on site or where an Environmental Audit or Environmental Assessment has been submitted. 16. Shoreline development must provide an analysis demonstrating that the project will remain fully functional for its intended use after a six-inch rise in sea level. 17. Provide justification for deviations from environmental LDC provisions pursuant to GMP CCME Policy 6.1.1 (13), if requested. _ 18. Where applicable, provide evidence of the issuance of all applicable federal and/or state oil and gas permits for a proposed oil and gas activities in Collier County. Include all state permits that comply with the requirements of 2 Chapter 62C-25 through 62C-30, F.A.C., as those rules existed on January 13, 2005. _ 0 U 19. Identify any Wellfield Risk Management Special Treatment Overlay Zones (WRM-ST) within the project area 0 A and provide an analysis for how the project design avoids the most intensive land uses within the most sensitive WRM-STs and will comply with the WRM-ST pursuant to 3.06.00. Indicate that the petition is in compliance N with 3.06.00 and does not propose any prohibited uses per LDC 3,06.00. °' Include the location of the Wellfield Risk Management Special Treatment Overlay Zones on the SDP or final pla = construction plans. For land use applications such as standard and PUD rezones and CUs, provide a separate site plan or zoning map with the project boundary and Wellfield Risk Management Special Treatment Overlay Zones w identified. I- N 20. Demonstrate that the design of the proposed stormwater management system and analysis of water quality and quantity impacts fully incorporate the requirements of the Watershed Management regulations of 3.07.00. 21. For sites located in the Big Cypress Area of Critical State Concern -Special Treatment overlay district (ACSC- ST), show how the project is consistent with the development standards and regulations in 4.02.14. 22. For multi -slip docking facilities with ten slips or more, and for all marina facilities, show how the project is consistent with 5.05.02. Refer to the Manatee Protection Plan for site specific requirements of the Manatee Protection Plan not included in 5.05.02. 23. For development orders within RFMU sending lands, show how the project is consistent with each of the applicable Objectives and Policies of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element of the GMP. 24 The County Manager or designee may require additional data or information necessary to evaluate the project's compliance with LDC and GMP requirements. (LDC I0.02.02.A.3 f) The following to be determined at preapplication meeting: (Choose those that apply) a Provide overall description of project with respect to environmental and water management issues. r Explain how project is consistent with each of the applicable objectives and policies in the CCME of the GMP- (ic,) Explain how the project meets or exceeds the native vegetation preservation requirement in the CCME and LDC. d. Indicate wetlands to be impacted and the effects of the impact to their functions and how the project's design compensates for wetland impacts. e. Indicate how the project design minimizes impacts to listed species. Describe the measures that are proposed as mitigation for impacts to listed species. 25. PUD zoning and CU petitions. For PUD rezones and CU petitions, applicants shall collate and package applicable Environmental Data Submittal Requirements into a single Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) Packet Pg. 75 document, prior to public hearings and after all applicable staff reviews are complete provided to the County Manager or designee prior to public hearings. (26 Is EAC Review (by CCPC) required? TE D 3.A.d Copies of the EIS s a 27. PUD master plan or PPL/SDP site plan notes (note requirements subject to change during review process) Type B or C Landscape Buffer (provide as Buffer commitment): Preserves may be used to satisfy the landscape buffer requirements after exotic vegetation removal in accordance with LDC sections 4.06.02 and 4.06.05.E.1. Supplemental plantings with native plant materiah shall be in accordance with LDC section 3.05.07. In order to provide the required insert Type B or C; buffer, a minimum 6-foot-wide landscape buffer easement located outside of the preserve will be conveyed by owner to a homeowner's association or condominium association at time of SDP or plat approval. Owner will plant additional landscape material in the buffer easement to achieve the opacity requirement nc later than one year from the issuance of the first residential certificate of occupancy. a L a� 0 U a� c a� o_ a� aD w ti N M CD Iq r Packet Pg. 76 Environmental PUDZ-PUDA Ch klist (non-RFMU) _`J Project Name — E��V�� aKC, n'lnit%�c { 3.A.d cof6tr___� Is the project is in compliance with the overlays, districts and/or zoning on the subject site and/or the surrounding (CON, ST, PUD, RLSA, RFMU, etc,) (LDC 2.03.05-2.03.08; 4,08,00) Not in CV Library properties? m7' 2. Submit a current aerial photograph (available from the Property Appraiser's office) and clearly delineate the subject site boundary lines. If the site is vegetated, provide FLUCFCS overlay and vegetation inventory identifying upland, wetland and exotic vegetation (Admin. Code Ch. 3 G.1. Application Contents #24). FLUCFCS Overlay -P627 (D3. Clearly identify the location of all preserves and label each as "Preserve" on all plans. (LDC 3.05.07.H.1), Preserve Label- P546 C4., Provide calculations on site plan showing the appropriate acreage of native vegetation to be retained, the max. amount and ratios permitted to be created on -site or mitigated off -site. Exclude vegetation located within utility and drainage easements from the preserve calculations (LDC 3.05.07.13-13; 3.05.07.F; 3.05.07.H.1.d-e). Preserve Calculation - P547 5. Created and retained preserve areas shall meet the minimum width requirements per LDC 3.05.07.H.1.b. Preserve Width - P603 C6.., Retained preservation areas shall be selected based on the criteria defined in LDC 3.05.07.A.3, include all 3 strata be in the largest contiguous area possible and shall be interconnected within the site and to adjoining off -site preservation areas or wildlife corridors. (LDC 3.05.07.A.14) Preserve Selection- P550 07- Principle structures shall be located a minimum of 25' from the boundary of the preserve boundary. No accessory structures and other site alterations, fill placement, grading, plant alteration or removal, or similar activity shall be permitted within 10' of the boundary unless it can be shown that it will not affect the integrity of the preserve (i.e. stem wal I or berm around wetland preserve). Provide cross -sections for each preserve boundary identifying all site alterations within 25', (LDC 3.05.07.H.3; 6.01.02.C.) Preserve Setback — New 08. Wildlife survey required for sites where an EIS is not required, when so warranted. (LDC 10.02.02.A.2.f) Listed Species - P522 9. Provide Environmental Data identifying author credentials, consistency determination with the GMPs, off -site preserves, seasonal and historic high water levels, and analysis of water quality. For land previously used for farm fields or golf course, provide soil sampling/groundwater monitoring reports identifying any site contamination. (LDC 3.08.00) Environmental Data Required — P 522 10: PUD Document and Master Plan shall state the minimum acreage required to be preserved. (LDC 10.02.13.A.2) Master Plan Contents-P626 i� ] 1.. If the PUD includes a Preserve Tract section A. Principal Use: Preserve B. Accessory Uses: Uses subject to LDC section Allowable uses within County required preserves Alternate format. If the agent insists on listing specific uses under Accessory Uses, the following language shall be used far B B. Passive uses are allowed within preserves to provide for access to the preserve, as long as any clearing required to facilitate these uses does not impact the minimum required native vegetation or cause loss of function to the preserve. Passive uses are subject to LDC section Allowable uses within County required preserves: 1. Pathways 2, Stormwater only when in accordance with the LDC. Packet Pg. 77 3.A.d PUD Commitments and Site Plan notes Where preserves occur adjacent to development off site and will be used in lieu of landscape buffers, include the following condition in the environmental commitments section of the PUD document or master plan: Preserves may be used to satisfy the landscape buffer requirements after exotic vegetation removal in accordance with LDC sections 4.06.02 and 4.06.05.E.1. Supplemental plantings with native plant materials shall be in accordance with LDC section 3.05.07. L12 PUD Document shall identify any listed species found on site and/or describe any unique vegetative features that will be preserved on the site. (LDC 10.02.13.A.2.) Unique Features- P628 Example: A management plan for the entire project shall be submitted in accordance with the requirements and procedures of the LDC for listed species including but not limited to Black Bear, Gopher Tortoise and listed birds The management plan shall be submitted prior to development of the first phase of the project. 13. Review cross -sections if provided; they are not required with the PUD. However, sometimes they are provided Is there any fill proposed in the preserve? Additional Comments: Cn a a� 0 U 06 a� LO a) R _ a� a� w N M to r Packet Pg. 78 3.A.d Ca ler C OUMty Growth Management Department Zoning Division Applicant/Agent may also send site plans or conceptual plans for review in advance if desired. PL20190002183 — 7-Eleven Rattlesnake Hammock & Collier (ASW) - PRE-APP INFO Assigned Ops Staff: Ellen Murray Camden Smith, (Ops Staff) STAFF FORM FOR SUPPLEMENTAL PRE -APPLICATION MEETING INFORMATION • Name and Number of who submitted pre-app request Sharon Nrabak, Quattrone & Associates, Inc- 239-936-5222 permits@gainc.net • Agent to list for PL# Quattrone & Associates, Inc, Michelle 5alberg and Al Quattrone • Owner of property (all owners for all parcels) Wilton Land Company, LLC • Confirm Purpose of Pre-App: (Rezone, etc.) Automotive Station Waiver Please list the density request of the project if applicable and number of homes/units/offices/docks (any that apply): Proposing 7-Eleven service station with car wash. ±3,454 sf building, with 8 MPD fuel pumps • Details about Project: ASW — Please provide details. REQUIRES} Supplemental Information provided by: Name: Title: Email: Phone: Cancellation/Reschedule Requests: Contact Danny Condomina-Client Services Supervisor danny.condomina@colliercountyfl Phone: 239-252-6866 Created April 5, 2017 Location: K:\CUES Planning Services\Current\Zoning Staff Information Zoring Derision • 2800 North Horseshoe Orive • Naples, %da 34104.23�252-2400 • www.colier9w.net Packet Pg. 79 3.A.d Co er County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Pre -Application Meeting and Final Submittal Requirement Checklist for: Waiver from Separation Requirements for Automobile Service Stations Chapter 6 G. of the Administrative Code The following Submittal Requirement Checklist is to be utilized during the Pre -Application Meeting, and at time of application submittal. At time of submittal, the checklist is to be completed and submitted with the application packet. Please provide the submittal items in the exact order listed below, with cover sheets attached to each section. Incomplete submittals will not be accepted. ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PUBLIC HEARING PROCESS: • Following the completion of the review process by County review staff, the applicant shall submit all materials electronically to the designated project manager. • Please contact the project manager to confirm the number of additional copies required. 6/3/2014 Page 3 of 4 Packet Pg. 80 CotLier County 3.A.d COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 PLANNERS — INDICATE IF THE PETITION NEEDS TO BE ROUTED TO THE FOLLOWING REVIEWERS: ❑ Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment: Executive Director ® Environmental Review: See Pre -Application Meeting Sign -In Sheet Addressing: Annis Moxam ❑ Graphics: Mariam Ocheltree ❑ City of Naples: Robin Singer, Planning Director ❑ Historical Review ❑Comprehensive Planning: See Pre -Application Meeting Sign -In Sheet ElImmokalee Water/Sewer District: ❑ Conservancy of SWFL: Nichole Ryan ❑ Parks and Recreation: Vicky Ahmad [� County Attorney's Office: Heidi Ashton-Cicko ❑x Transportation Pathways: Stacey Revay ❑ Emergency Management: Dan Summers; and/or EMS: Artie Bay ❑ School District (Residential Components): Amy Heartlock ❑ Engineering: Alison Bradford I ❑ I Transportation Planning: John Podczerwinsky ❑ Other: ❑ I Utilities Engineering: Kris VanLengen FEE REQUIREMENTS All checks poyoble to: Board of County Commissioners pC1� a, i<Pre-Application Meeting: $500.00 (to be credited towards the application fee if the application is filed within 9 months of pre -application meeting) 'X'Automohile Service Station Separation Requirement Waiver: $1,000.00 "O> stimated Legal Advertising fee for the Office of the Hearing Examiner or the BZA: $500.00 Agent/Owner Signature Applicant/Owner Name (please print) Date 6/3/2014 Page 4 of 4 Packet Pg. 81 I 3.A.d I ASW SITE PLAN El E L Q C d E t V a Q Packet Pg. 82 f lE1IHX21xaniVnn aOrnxas OinV g 9NIa33N19N-1QI1dW NUVd'IDOWWVH I I I _ z III I z �Z II o s y l aI all oao w- a LL, z Ow z 9- ZZK w wa NNOD U p' s i'n I II a d�v I III I ro II (r III I II I I - - -- _ --- -- ---- =--=8 IIII '� II n II I ) Ili li 11 II p I I I I I I I I III ------- :II II pZ I III III D m I 1 III I 11 I I O I 1 � �g J II III U I I I i,l O u o @I �+� { I a I'I IIII I:•�:� i Q a W J m 3 II N 1 I I�'1I W Y �I W a0 w > O Q I H k AI X W 11 III a N II I w III Y iI U I'I COLLIER BLVD. I; I pIL I a IIII H U li � '1 1 �r I I Y III II Q Z IIII p> oD 111 w OF ; I NU WOII'I Z Z� Id rc w W I ZK O J i y i t y x w I I I NO U NU ZW -lw � a o III I I I I II I II — I) IIII II w U ww ( p10 it a �II LL III II I 1 m III O ~ II oz I W � III I LLUw oU LLF0 c, m3h mo i--------------,ma_ �w J a --- omo pa , ----------- COLLIER BLVD (CR 951) -- LL --------- - -- -- - ------ - ----------------- I w I ro U 2ZO H d Or Z U Q 0 ZUi > U N j U W co �di WN� a7 I a� Z U Z Z 02 W z Of Z 2 O� ONU NU I 3.A.d I WARRANTY IDIDIDIC El Q Packet Pg. 84 INSTR 5977074 OR 5868 PG 640 E—RECORDED 12/29/2020 1:40 PM PAGES 2 CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT AND COMPTROLLER, COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA Doc@.70 $0.70 REC $18.50 CONS $10.00 3.A.d This Warranty Deed Prepared Without Review or Opinion of Title by: Harold J. Webre, Esquire COLEMAN, YOVANOVICH & KOESTER, P.A. 4001 Tamiami Trail N., Suite 300 Naples, FL 34103 (239) 435-3535 Consideration: $10.00 (NOTE: This transfer is between related entities for nominal consideration only) WARRANTY DEED r THIS WARRANTY DEED is made this Z-00 day of , 2020, between Wilton Land Company, LLC, a Florida limited liability company, whose address is 206 Dudley Road, Wilton, CT 06897 {"o�tcc r, ,a� �liammock Park Apartments, LLC, a Florida limited liability company va�dres Alico Rd., Fort Myers, FL 33912 ("Grantee"). Grantor, in consider tiox, of� mum -of -TE AND O 00 DOLLARS ($10.00) and other good and valuable casrcrs i �a�d�ao�a, ri paid by Grantee, the receipt of which is hereby acknowled ed,f a� gr to la g I'd hi d iko tl e said Grantee and Grantee's successors and assigns for r' the ttf jlowi�i� `des ribec �pr pe y situated, lying and being in Collier County, Florida, to�. 0 See Exhibit "A" atta0khereto and incorp t % o n by reference. PARCEL ID NUMBER: -2 SUBJECT TO: (a) ad valorem and nori a` valorem real property taxes for 2020 and subsequent years; (b) comprehensive land use plans, zoning, restrictions, prohibitions and other requirements imposed by governmental authority; (c) outstanding oil, gas and mineral interests of record, if any; and (d) covenants, easements, restrictions and other matters of record. And said Grantor does hereby fully warrant the title to said property, and will defend the same against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. Warranty Deed Page No. 1 of 2 Packet Pg. 85 *** OR 5868 PG 641 *** 3.A.d IN WTINESS WHEREOF, Grantor has executed and delivered this Warranty Deed the day and year first above written. Signed, sealed and delivered in our presence: 9 Witness 1 - Printed Name Witness 1 — S' Witness 2 —Signature Witness 2-1?rinted Name STATE OF cot.NTx of 1 Tip` Wilton Land Company, LLC, a Florida limited liability company By: /= George P. B er, as Trustee of the George P. Bauer Revocable Trust dated July 20, 1990, its Manager co Seal The foregoing Warranty Deed was acknowledged before me by means of W physical presence or [I online notarization, on this Z 2r day of 2020, by George P. Bauer, as Trustee of the George P. Bauer Revocable Trust dated July 20, 1990, as Manager of Wilton Land Company, LLC, a Florida limited liability company. He W is personally known to me or [I produced as identification. Ndary Public State of Ronda �j��, � . Y� l ap � c�'�"M M. Walkup Notary Public -Signature r�nyy comma«, c�c aa5a5s exn��es 0112112024 print Name: dal-k Warranty Deed Page No. 2 of 2 Packet Pg. 86 I 3.A.d I AFFIDAVITS OF AUTHORIZATION El E L Q C d E t V a Q Packet Pg. 87 3.A.d AFFIDAVIT OF AUTHORIZATION FOR PETITION NUMBERS(5) PL20190002183 I, ❑AVI❑ E. TORRES (print name), as MANAGING MEMBER (title, if applicable) of RfAMMOCK PARK APARTMENTS, LLC (company, If ap licable), swear or affirm under oath, that I am the (choose one) owner0 applicantMcontract purchaser=and that: 1. I have full authority to secure the approvai(s) requested and to impose covenants and restrictions on the referenced property as a result of any action approved by the County in accordance with this application and the Land Development Code; 2. All answers to the questions in this application and any sketches, data or other supplementary matter attached hereto and made a part of this application are honest and true; 3. 1 have authorized the staff of Collier County to enter upon the property during normal working hours for the purpose of investigating and evaluating the request made through this application; and that 4. The property will be transferred, conveyed, sold or subdivided subject to the conditions and restrictions imposed by the approved action, 5. Well authorize WAL.DROP ENGINEERING, P.A. to act as our/my representative in any matters regarding this petition including 1 through 2 above. "Notes: • If the applicant is a corporation, then it is usually executed by the carp. pres. or v. pres. • If the applicant is a Limited Liability Company (L. L. C. ) or Limited Company (L.C. ), then the documents should typically be signed by the Company's "Managing Member." • If the applicant is a partnership, then typically a partner can sign on behalf of the partnership. • if the applicant is a limited partnership, then the general partner must sign and be identified as the "general partner" of the named partnership. • if the applicant is a trust, then they must include the trustee's name and the words "as trustee ■ In each instance, first determine the applicants status, e.g., individual, corporate, trust, partnership, and then use the appropriate format for that ownership. Under penalties of perjury, I decl4f-elNt I have read the f egoing Affidavit of Authorization and that the facts stated in it are true. Signature pate STATE OF FLORIDA _ I. ore5 COUNTY OF COLLIER t _V The foregoing instrument was acknowleged before me by means of Mphysical resence or ® online notarization this AH= day of L ECLW4&- , 20 24) , by (printed name of owner or qualifier) �C_ -I) ryes Such person(s) Notary Public must check applicable box: Are personally known to me ❑ Has produced a current drivers license ® Has produced as identification. Notary Signature: _0 A =� CPl08-C OAA011ry1155 11J,L' 31412020 NOWpwbhe State of PkA ida Charlotte bI Walkup ilhy ComrrN� CCi 945a56 Expires 01/21/2024 Packet Pg. 88 3.A.d AFFIDAVIT OF AUTHORIZATION FOR PETITION NUMBERS(S) PL20190002183 1, OAVI❑ E. TORRES (print name), as MANAGING MEMBER (title, if applicable) of HAMMGCK PARK APARTMENTS. LLC (company, If applicable), swear or affirm under oath, that I am the (choose one) ownerQapplicant f-71contract purchaserFland that: 1. l have full authority to secure the approval(s) requested and to impose covenants and restrictions on the referenced property as a result of any action approved by the County in accordance with this application and the Land Development Code; 2. All answers to the questions in this application and any sketches, data or other supplementary matter attached hereto and made a part of this application are honest and true; 3. 1 have authorized the staff of Collier County to enter upon the property during normal working hours for the purpose of investigating and evaluating the request made through this application; and that 4. The property will be transferred, conveyed, sold or subdivided subject to the conditions and restrictions imposed by the approved action. 5. We/I authorize COLEMAN. YOVANOVICH & KOZSTFR cf0 RICHARD YOVANOVICH to act as our/my representative in any matters regarding this petition including 1 through 2 above. Notes: • If the applicant is a corporation, then it is usually executed by the corp. pres_ or v. pres. • if the applicant is a Limited Liability Company (L. L. C. ) or Limited Company (L. C.), then the documents should typically be signed by the Company's "Managing Member. " ■ If the applicant is a partnership, then typically a partner can sign on behalf or the partnership. • If the applicant is a limited partnership, then the general partner must sign and be identified as the "general partner" of the named partnership. • If the applicant is a trust, then they must include the trustee's name and the words "as trustee" ■ in each instance, first determine the applicant's status, e.g„ individual, corporate, trust partnership, and then use the appropriate format for that ownership. Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I have read the foregoing Affidavit of Authorization and that the facts stated in it are true,'—�A L,— Y/ Signatu STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER 11 -M-2_C_*� Date The foregoing instrument was acknowleged before me by means of ® physical resence or ® online notarization this Ok 28 , day of � hW 24 Z0, by (printed name of owner or qualifier) �t� ! C!�e Such persons} Notary Public must check applicable box: ML Are personally known to me ® Has produced a current drivers license Has produced as identification. Notary Signature. C-"40- /4, glA �,, CMS-CO1-Qd1 M1SS REV 3/4/2020 N Stale of Florida Chary tie M. Charlotte M. Walkup My commmmm GG $45466 ExPir" 01/21/2024 Packet Pg. 89 I 3.A.d I DISCLOSURE OF INTEREST El Q Packet Pg. 90 3.A.d Cot .I er County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 'ROPFRTY n%AiKirRc41ia nISCLOc-1 iRF FnRnn This is a required form with all land use petitions, except for Appeals and Zoning Verification Letters. Should any changes of ownership or changes in contracts for purchase occur subsequent to the date of application, but prior to the date of the final public hearing, it is the responsibility of the applicant, or agent on his behalf, to submit a supplemental disclosure of interest form. Please complete the following, use additional sheets if necessary. a. If the property is owned fee simple by an INDIVIDUAL, tenancy by the entirety, tenancy in common, or joint tenancy, list all parties with an ownership interest as well as the percentage of such interest: C Name and Address I % of Ownership If the property is owned by a CORPORATION, list the officers and stockholders and the percentage of stock owned by each: Name and Address I % of Ownership If the property is in the name of a TRUSTEE, list the beneficiaries of the trust with the percentage of interest: Name and Address I % of Ownership Created 9/28/2017 Page 1 of 3 Packet Pg. 91 Co*er Count 3.A.d COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLE5, FLORIDA 34104 www.coliiergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAH: (239) 252-6358 d. If the property is in the name of a GENERAL or LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, list the name of the general and/or limited partners: e f, Name and Address °% of Ownership '5�'aC- 9 ALL .La gyp' If there is a CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE, with an individual or individuals, a Corporation, Trustee, or a Partnership, list the names of the contract purchasers below, including the r r- L �1114CI J,'LV 4, IUIUCI J, uCl ICI li.I df ICS, UI PCII LI le b.- Name and Address % of Ownership Date of Contract: If any contingency clause or contract terms involve additional parties, list all individuals or a Date subject property acquired ❑ Leased: Term of lease or trust: Name and Address years /months If, Petitioner has option to buy, indicate the following: Created 9/28/2017 Page 2 of 3 a 2 6 U 06 a� Y aD c a� m w N rn Lo v Packet Pg. 92 3.A.d COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.collier ov.net Date of option: Date option terminates: Anticipated closing date: Coder County 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLE5, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 AFFIRM PROPERTY OWNERSHIP INFORMATION Any petition required to have Property Ownership Disclosure, will not be accepted without this form. Requirements for petition types are located on the associated application form. Any change in ownership whether individually or with a Trustee, Company or other interest -holding party, must be disclosed to Collier County immediately if such change occurs prior to the petition's final public hearing. As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, i attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is included in this submittal package, I understand that failure to include all necessary submittal information may result in the delay of processing this petition. The completed application, all required submittal materials, and fees shall be submitted to: Growth Management Department ATTN: Business Center 2800 North Horseshoe Drive 1,% Naples, FL 34104 DAV! E. TOR Agent/Owner Name (please print Created 9/28/2017 Date Page 3 of 3 Packet Pg. 93 I 3.A.d I ENVIRONMENTAL DATA El Q Packet Pg. 94 3.A.d HAMMOCK PARK COLLIER COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL DATA REPORT Revised June 2019 Prepared For: Tract L Development, LLC 7742 Alico Road Fort Myers, Florida 33912 (239) 208-4079 Prepared By: Passarella & Associates, Inc. 13620 Metropolis Avenue, Suite 200 Fort Myers, Florida 33912 (239) 274-0067 Project No. 05TSC1438 Packet Pg. 95 3.A.d TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Introduction.................................................................................................................................... I 'r Environmental Data Authors.........................................................................................................1 L a� 0 U 06 VegetationDescriptions.................................................................................................................2 0 �a c N Listed Species Survey 4' p Y.................................................................................................................... CU o: c a� Native Vegetation Preservation.....................................................................................................4 w ti N References......................................................................................................................................5 Packet Pg. 96 3.A.d LIST OF TABLES Page Table 1. Native and Non -Native Habitat Types and Vegetation Acreages .........................5 Packet Pg. 97 3.A.d LIST OF EXHIBITS Page Exhibit 1. Project Location Map.........................................................................................El-1 Exhibit 2. Aerial with FLUCFCS and Wetlands Map ........................................................ E2-1 Exhibit 3. Native Vegetation Map...................................................................................... E3-1 Exhibit 4. Listed Species Survey........................................................................................E4-1 Exhibit 5. Aerial with Bald Eagle Nest and Protection Zones...........................................E5-1 Exhibit 6. Aerial with On -Site and Adjacent Off -Site Preservation Areas ........................E6-1 Cn Q d 6 U 0a a) 19 m c as m W c as d w ti N 0) Co T ff Packet Pg. 98 3.A.d INTRODUCTION The following environmental data report is provided in support of the zoning application for Hammock Park (Project). The following information was prepared in accordance with the Collier County environmental data submittal requirements outlined in Chapter 3.08.00 of the Collier County Land Development Code (LDC). The Project totals 19.13± acres and is located in Section 14, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County (Exhibit 1). More specifically, the Project is located northeast of the intersection of Collier Boulevard (County Road 951) and Rattlesnake Hammock Road. The Project is bordered by the Good Turn Center project to the north, the McMullen Parcel to the east, Rattlesnake Hammock Road to the south, and Collier Boulevard to the west. The Project includes a modification to an existing Planned Unit Development (PUD) known as Hammock Park Commerce Center (Ordinance No. 07-30). The modification includes the addition of a potential mixed -use or residential component. South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) Permit No. 11-02130-P and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (COE) Permit No. SAJ-1999-04926 were issued for the Project on October 10, 2002 and February 12, 2009, respectively. Additional modifications to the SFWMD permit were issued on February 8, 2008 and July 1, 2014 and to the COE permit on July 21, 2014. The majority of the Project site is comprised of previously cleared, disturbed land. The Project site contains a 1.63± acre Collier County native vegetation preserve along the northern portion boundary which was designated as part of Ordinance No. 7-30. This report includes details regarding the authors' qualifications, vegetation descriptions for the various on -site habitats, results of the listed species survey conducted by Passarella & Associates, Inc. (PAI) in October 2018, and the minimum native vegetation preservation requirement. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA AUTHORS This report was prepared by Heather Samborski and Bethany Brosious. They both satisfy the environmental credential and experience requirements, per Section 3.08.00(A)2 of the Collier County LDC. Ms. Samborski is an Ecologist with PAI, with four years of consulting experience in the environmental industry. She holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Environmental Studies from Eastern Connecticut State University and a Master of Science degree in Environmental Sciences from Florida Gulf Coast University. Ms. Brosious is an Ecologist with PAI, with 12 years of consulting experience in the environmental industry. She holds a Bachelor of Science degree in Animal Sciences from the University of Florida and a Master of Science degree in Environmental Sciences from Florida Gulf Coast University. 1 Packet Pg. 99 3.A.d VEGETATION DESCRIPTIONS The existing vegetative cover and land uses on the Project site include a combination of undeveloped, disturbed land and forested uplands and wetlands with varying degrees of exotic infestation. The vegetation associations for the property were delineated using December 2017 rectified color aerials (Scale: 1" = 100'). Groundtruthing was conducted in October 2018. These delineations were classified based on the nomenclature of the Florida Land Use, Cover and Forms Classification System (FLUCFCS) Levels III and IV (Florida Department of Transportation 1999). Level IV FLUCFCS was utilized to denote disturbance and ` E" codes were used to identify levels of exotic species invasion (i.e., melaleuca (Melaleuca quinquenervia), earleaf acacia (Acacia auriculiformis), downy rose -myrtle (Rhodomyrtus tomentosa), and Brazilian pepper (Schinus terebinthifolius)). AutoCAD Map 3D 2017 software was used to determine the acreage of each mapped polygon, produce summaries, and generate the final FLUCFCS map (Exhibit 2). A total of 12 vegetative associations and land uses (i.e., FLUCFCS codes) were identified on the property. The dominant habitat type on the property is Disturbed Land, Hydric (FLUCFCS Code 7401), accounting for 45.2 percent of the property (8.64± acres). Exotic vegetation documented on -site includes, but is not limited to, Brazilian pepper, earleaf acacia, torpedograss (Panicum repens), and melaleuca. The degree of exotic infestation ranges from 0 to nearly 100 percent cover. The Project site contains 13.59± acres of SFWMD and potential COE jurisdictional wetlands (Exhibits 2 and 3). The jurisdictional wetlands identified by FLUCFCS code include approximately 2.59± acres of Hydric Pine, Disturbed (0-24% Exotics) (FLUCFCS Code 6259 El); 1.89± acres of Hydric Pine, Disturbed (76-100% Exotics) (FLUCFCS Code 6259 E4); 0.47± acre of Freshwater Marsh, Disturbed (50-75% Exotics) (FLUCFCS Code 6419 E3); and 8.64± acres of Disturbed Land, Hydric (FLUCFCS Code 7401). The on -site wetland quality has been diminished by previously authorized site disturbance, a degraded regional hydrologic connection, and the infestation of exotic vegetation including Brazilian pepper, torpedograss, melaleuca, and earleaf acacia. The acreage and descriptions for each FLUCFCS classification are outlined below. Pine, Disturbed (0-24% Exotics) FLUCFCS Code 4159 El) The canopy contains slash pine (Pinus elliottii) and scattered cabbage palm (Sabal palmetto). The sub -canopy consists of slash pine, cabbage palm, wax myrtle (Morella cerifera), and earleaf acacia. The ground cover includes gulfdune paspalum (Paspalum monostachyum), little blue maidencane (Amphicarpum muehlenbergianum), and torpedograss. Pine, Disturbed (76-100% Exotics) FLUCFCS Code 4159 E4) The canopy is similar to FLUCFCS Code 4159 El. The sub -canopy consists of 76 to 100 percent cover by earleaf acacia, melaleuca, and Brazilian pepper. The ground cover includes torpedograss, spermacoce (Spermacoce verticillata), bushy bluestem (Andropogon glomeratus), and beaksedge (Rhynchospora microcarpa). 2 Packet Pg. 100 3.A.d Cypress, Pine, Cabbage Palm, Disturbed and Drained (76-100% Exotics) (FLUCFCS Code 6245 The canopy consists of slash pine, cypress (Taxodium distichum), and Brazilian pepper. The sub - canopy was mostly open with scattered cabbage palm. The ground cover includes grapevine (Vitis sp.), caesarweed (Urena lobata), dog fennel (Eupatorium capillifolium), torpedograss, and spermacoce. Hydric Pine, Disturbed (0-24% Exotics) FLUCFCS Code 6259 El) The canopy consists primarily of slash pine. The sub -canopy contains slash pine, wax myrtle, myrsine (Myrsine cubana), dahoon holly (Ilex cassine), and cypress. The ground cover includes sand cordgrass (Spartina bakeri), sawgrass (Cladium jamaicense), little blue maidencane, gulfdune paspalum, and spermacoce. Hydric Pine, Disturbed (76-100% Exotics) FLUCFCS Code 6259 E4) The canopy consists of slash pine with some cabbage palm. The sub -canopy contains Brazilian pepper and earleaf acacia. The ground cover includes torpedograss, spermacoce, bushy bluestem, and beaksedge. Freshwater Marsh, Disturbed (50-75% Exotics) FLUCFCS Code 6419 E3) The canopy is open with scattered cypress. The sub -canopy is open with scattered cypress, Brazilian pepper, and willow (Salix caroliniana). The ground cover includes pickerelweed (Pontederia cordata), arrowhead (Sagittaria lancifolia), smartweed (Polygonum spp.), maidencane (Panicum hemitomon), torpedograss, and fireflag (Thalia geniculata). Disturbed Land (FLUCFCS Code 740) The canopy and sub -canopy are open. The ground cover consists of torpedograss, spermacoce, bushy bluestem, and coastal foxtail (Setaria corrugata). Disturbed Land, Hydric (FLUCFCS Code 7401) The canopy and sub -canopy are open with scattered melaleuca. The ground cover includes torpedograss, spermacoce, dog fennel, beaksedge, and inundated beaksedge (Rhynchospora inundata). Spoil Areas (FLUCFCS Code 743) The canopy is open and the sub -canopy includes Brazilian pepper and earleaf acacia. The ground cover includes fennel (Eupatorium leptophyllum), torpedograss, spermacoce, and caesarweed. Road (FLUCFCS Code 814) This area consists of a paved road which occupies 0.01± acre or 0.1 percent of the property. Utilities FLUCFCS Code 830) This is comprised of a pump station and accounts for 0.10± acre or 0.5 percent of the property Electrical Transmission Lines (FLUCFCS Code 832) This area is occupied by Florida Power & Light powerlines and accounts for 0.30± acre or 1.6 percent of the property. Packet Pg. 101 3.A.d LISTED SPECIES SURVEY A listed plant and wildlife species survey was conducted by PAI on the Project site on October 2, 2018. No listed wildlife species were observed during the listed species survey. The listed species survey methodology and results are provided as Exhibit 4. The Project has previously been reviewed by both the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWCC) and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) as part of the state and federal permitting process. A biological opinion for the Project was issued by the USFWS on December 17, 2008 and addressed potential Project impacts to the Florida panther (Puma concolor coryi). In addition, as part of a COE permit extension request, a USFWS concurrence letter was issued on March 20, 2014 and found that the Project "may affect but is not likely to adversely affect" the Florida bonneted bat (Eumops floridanus). During a December 2018 site visit, a bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) nest was documented approximately 20 feet north of the Project site. The nest is located in a live slash pine approximately 800± feet east of Collier Boulevard. An aerial depicting the location of the bald eagle nest and USFWS protection zones is included as Exhibit 5. Prior to the initiation of construction activities, the developer will coordinate with Collier County, the USFWS, and the FWCC with respect to the newly identified bald eagle nest regarding applicable guidelines and permitting requirements as described in the FWCC Bald Eagle Management Plan Handbook (FWCC 2010) and the USFWS National Bald Eagle Management Guidelines (USFWS 2007). NATIVE VEGETATION PRESERVATION Per PUD Ordinance 07-30, 15 percent of the on -site native vegetation was required to be preserved to meet the Collier County minimum native vegetation preservation requirement in accordance with Section 3.05.07.B.I of the Collier County LDC. This resulted in a preservation requirement of 1.63± acres of native vegetation. A 1.63± acre Collier County native vegetation preserve, which satisfies the minimum native vegetation preservation requirement, was established on the northern boundary of the Project. The preserve is protected via a conservation easement granted to Collier County and the SFWMD. The preserve has been enhanced through the removal of exotic vegetation and supplemental plantings. The proposed zoning amendment application incudes the addition of a residential land use to the PUD. Per LDC Section 3.05.07.B.1, for a residential or mixed -use development that is less than 20 acres in size, the minimum preserve requirement is 15 percent of the native vegetation. The Project contains 7.14f acres of native vegetation. A utility easement which bisects the eastern portion of the property was not classified as native vegetation for this zoning amendment application. In addition, 2.22± acres area of Disturbed Land; 8.64f acres of Disturbed Land, Hydric; 0.37± acre of Spoil Areas; 0.01± acre of Road; 0.10± acre of Utilities; and 0.30± acre of Electrical Transmission Lines were classified as non-native vegetation. Also excluded was 0.35± acre of Freshwater Marsh (50-75% Exotics) located within the existing electrical powerline easement (Exhibit 3). Packet Pg. 102 3.A.d Table 1 provides a summary of the existing native vegetation communities on -site and the native vegetation preservation calculation. Table 1. Native and Non -Native Habitat Types and Vegetation Acreages FLUCFCS Code Description Native Acreage Non -Native Acreage 4159 E1 Pine, Disturbed 0-24% Exotics 0.16 4159 E4 Pine, Disturbed 76-100% Exotics 0.63 6245 E4 Cypress, Pine, Cabbage Palm, Disturbed and Drained 76-100% Exotics 1.75 6259 E1 H dric Pine, Disturbed 0-24% Exotics 2.59 6259 E4 H dric Pine, Disturbed 76-100% Exotics 1.89 6419 E3 Freshwater Marsh, Disturbed 50-75% Exotics 0.12 0.35 740 Disturbed Land 2.22 7401 Disturbed Land, H dric 8.64 743 Spoil Areas 0.37 814 Road 0.01 830 Utilities 0.10 832 Electrical Transmission Lines 0.30 Total 7.14 11.99 Minimum Retained Native Vegetation Requirement Per Collier County Ordinance No. 07-30 1.63* *Per Collier County Ordinance No. 07-30, 15 percent of the on -site native vegetation was preserved. Please see the Master Concept Plan and Exhibit 6 for the preserve area location. The on -site preserve location and habitats were selected according to the priority criteria set forth in Sections 3.05.07(A)4 and 3.05.05(A)5 of the Collier County LDC. The on -site preserve maintained the highest quality native vegetation on -site, connects off -site preservation areas to the north, and is in close proximity to off -site adjacent preservation areas to the east (Exhibit 6). In addition, the preserve location will provide a buffer between the off -site bald eagle nest, located just north of the property boundary, and proposed future development activities on the Project site. Enhancement activities conducted within the preserve areas included the removal of exotic vegetation and supplemental planting. The preserve area is currently protected via a conservation easement granted to both Collier County and the SFWMD and will remain protected in perpetuity. REFERENCES Florida Department of Transportation. 1999. Florida Land Use, Cover and Forms Classification System. Procedure No. 550-010-001-a. Second Edition. 5 Packet Pg. 103 3.A.d Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission. 2010. Bald Eagle Management Plan Handbook. Tallahassee, Florida. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2007. National Bald Eagle Management Guidelines I Packet Pg. 104 3.A.d EXHIBIT I PROJECT LOCATION MAP El E L Q C d E t V a Q Packet Pg. 105 MARKLEYAVEI EXIT 101 lF. f �. II~ 'IWASHBURNAVE J vAh/BONwHB.L,AKE_BLVD ` d- BECK-B 75 - RAD.10 RD q d JWj i * 9. 4 ply �BLVD"' Y m z{ L LL• 2 T.�IrRw i; }Or,j, 3yGr�""eyG�r t%+ m_I I'•.r'`ti �•k' `w,• }� I: Ry- z .L �h'-PIT ,�' y, - NEWMAN DR AVdSrBLVD� N.. �,}"'9GEQR �vca W,wY,'C.OP;EL'NY Y z .S CL'UBsEN >X :`��? d 21D:S31? TAKER-RDr >}<4 'MA 'D ' ,pI� Y PROJECT 'i47 O01 . • • R C �SNAKE�.H MOCKrRD- o ER04AL`I"4 -.- SABAL PALM RD o, N 3.A.d EXHIBIT 2 AERIAL WITH FLUCFCS AND WETLANDS MAP Packet Pg. 107 ((MSY) Jalllo3 g a3leuseluea uanal3-L : Z6946) sleua;eW dn)loeg pue uol;eoilddy - 3 ;uawyoe;;y :;uawyoe;;y Q � - M - � w NQ p6 'oLL wo ww oN az is t ao o oz ao a oa aIz aJrn ;Qw z6 urn -a F wmo� ao ro 0 IL u IL 11 O¢mm�u�irn u�i� arn�m�o � w XDOCI ai mmN� p �oo�d � Q U p Ci a o�N�owm000 � � w X r z 4 a o � o - 0 o 8 11 m�-N w o bws h L U �i 8 wmw w 0 3 z O �1 a ¢ J c m F pp O X o a W O N N(fp m¢¢ Ca [L rp o. -rnry W w w La a d 2 h a 4. W way. o¢o O { y /qp d c0 ro 1 w 6,11 W W a¢¢ O O LLU V V t0 tp �ONn I�rmm� 7 ,� 1*IF =co g C] h cci Y N a z W a c a a T- •4 F b 3 3.A.d EXHIBIT 3 NATIVE VEGETATION MAP El E L Q C d E t V a Q Packet Pg. 109 = ccs m1100 V9e®mau_22 ) $ _+ mm+wd� @p_ m m&-o_mu m a_Ljoqm LU \,\\\ \ \,\ \\ \,\ \\ \ \,\ \\ 2 \ \\\\\}\/ F / §[j 0 CL � 3.A.d EXHIBIT 4 LISTED SPECIES SURVEY El E L Q C d E t V a Q Packet Pg. 111 3.A.d HAMMOCK PARK LISTED SPECIES SURVEY Revised March 2019 1.0 INTRODUCTION This report documents the results of the listed species survey conducted by Passarella & Associates, Inc. (PAI) on October 2, 2018 for the 19.13± acre Hammock Park (Project). The Project includes a proposed mixed -use commercial/residential development with associated infrastructure and stormwater management system. Listed species surveys for the Project were previously conducted in September 2006 and July 2012. The Project is located in Section 14, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County (Figure 1). More specifically, the Project is located at the northeast corner of the intersection of Collier Boulevard (County Road 951) and Rattlesnake Hammock Road. The Project is bound by Good Turn Center to the north, the McMullen Parcel to the east, Rattlesnake Hammock Road to the south, and the 951 Canal and Collier Boulevard to the west. The Project site contains an on -site preservation area that is located on the northern boundary. The remainder of the Project site is comprised of undeveloped, partly forested land that has been invaded to various degrees by exotic vegetation. 2.0 LITERATURE REVIEW AND FIELD SURVEY METHODOLOGY A literature review and field survey was conducted to determine whether the Project site was being utilized by state and/or federally -listed species as identified by the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWCC) and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) as endangered, threatened, or species of special concern. In addition, the property was surveyed for plant species listed by the Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services and the USFWS as endangered, threatened, or commercially exploited or species included on the Collier County Rare and Less Rare plant lists (Land Development Code (LDC) Section 3.04.03). 2.1 Literature Review The literature review involved an examination of available information on listed species in the Project's geographical region. The literature sources reviewed included the FWCC Florida's Endangered and Threatened Species (2017); Florida Atlas of Breeding Sites for Herons and Their Allies (Runde et al. 1991); USFWS Habitat Management Guidelines for the Bald Eagle in the Southeast Region (1987); the Florida Panther Habitat Preservation Plan (Logan et al. 1993); the Landscape Conservation Strategy Map (Kautz et al. 2006); and USFWS and FWCC databases for telemetry locations of the Florida panther (Puma concolor coryi), bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus), red -cockaded woodpecker (Picoides borealis) (RCW), Florida black bear (Ursus americanus E4-1 Packet Pg. 112 3.A.d floridanus), Florida scrub jay (Aphelocoma coerulescens), and wading bird rookeries (such as the wood stork (Mycteria americana)) in Collier County. The FWCC and USFWS database information is updated on a periodic basis and is current through different dates, depending on the species. The FWCC information that was reviewed is current through the noted dates for the following four species: Florida panther telemetry — September 2018; bald eagle nest locations — April 2016; black bear telemetry — December 2007; and RCW locations — August 2017. 2.2 Field Survey The field survey was conducted during daylight hours by qualified ecologists walking parallel belt transects across the Project site. Transects were spaced to ensure that sufficient visual coverage of ground and flora was obtained. Approximate transect locations and spacing are shown on Figure 2. At regular intervals the ecologists stopped, remained quiet, and listened for wildlife vocalizations. The survey was conducted with the aid of 8x or 1 Ox power binoculars. The listed wildlife species surveyed for included, but were not limited to, gopher tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus), Eastern indigo snake (Drymarchon corais couperi), RCW, wood stork, Big Cypress fox squirrel (Sciurus niger avicennia), and Florida panther. The listed plant species surveyed for included species typical to forested upland and wetland habitats in this geographical region, as well as listed epiphytes and terrestrial orchids common in Southwest Florida. 3.0 RESULTS 3.1 Literature Review The literature search found no documented occurrences for listed wildlife species on the Project site (Figure 3). The closest documented bald eagle nest is an unnumbered nest located approximately 20 feet north of the northern property boundary. The nest was discovered during a December 2018 site visit and is located in a live slash pine (Pious elliottii) tree. The location of the nest and the USFWS eagle protection zones are depicted in Figure 4. Bald eagles are not a state or federally -listed species; however, they are protected under the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act. No RCW colonies or cavity trees are documented on the Project site, per the FWCC's database (Figure 3). The closest documented RCW location is located approximately 0.25 mile west of the Project site. This location and the others documented west of Collier Boulevard are considered relic or historic locations, as there are no currently known active cavity trees west of Collier Boulevard, based on PAI's survey experience in E4-2 Packet Pg. 113 3.A.d this region over the last 20 years. The RCW is a state and federally -listed endangered species. The Project site is located within the 30± kilometer (18.6± miles) Core Foraging Area (CFA) of one documented wood stork rookery (No. 619018) (Figure 5). The wetlands within the proposed development limits are predominantly infested with exotic vegetation including torpedograss (Panicum repens), spermacoce (Spermacoce verticillata), and earleaf acacia (Acacia auriculiformis). As such, the property's foraging potential is rather poor. The wood stork is a state and federally -listed threatened species. No Florida panther telemetry is located on the Project site; however, panther telemetry points were documented in the immediate vicinity of the Project (Figure 3). The telemetry points were from Florida panther Nos. 148 and 219 and were recorded in August 2010 and December 2013, respectively. Both panthers have since died. The property is within the Florida panther Primary Zone (Kautz et al. 2006) (Figure 6). The Florida panther is a state- and federally -listed endangered species. The Project site is located within the USFWS Florida bonneted bat (Eumops floridana) Consultation Area but outside of the USFWS Florida bonneted bat Focal Area (Figure 7). The Florida bonneted bat is a state and federally -listed endangered species. 3.2 Field Survey The field survey was conducted on October 2, 2018. Weather conditions during the survey were partly cloudy skies, with 10 to 15 miles per hour easterly winds, and temperatures in the upper 80s to low 90s. The field survey identified no listed wildlife or plant species on the Project site (Figure 2). No listed species were documented utilizing the Project site during the October 2018 survey. During a December 2018 site visit, a bald eagle nest was discovered approximately 20 feet north of the northern property boundary (Figure 4). 4.0 SUMMARY The literature search and review of agency databases found no documented occurrences for listed species on the Project site. The Project site is located within the Primary Zone for the Florida panther and is located within one documented wood stork colony CFA. The Project is located within the consultation area for the RCW and the Florida bonneted bat. The October 2, 2018 field survey documented no listed species within the Project limits. In December 2018, an active bald eagle nest was documented approximately 20 feet north of the Project. This is a previously undocumented nest location. Prior to the initiation of construction activities, the developer will coordinate with Collier County, the USFWS, and the FWCC with respect to the newly identified bald eagle nest regarding applicable guidelines and permitting requirements as described in the FWCC Bald Eagle Management Plan Handbook (FWCC 2010) and the USFWS National Bald Eagle Management Guidelines (USFWS 2007). E4-3 Packet Pg. 114 3.A.d 5.0 REFERENCES Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission. 2010. Bald Eagle Management Plan Handbook. Tallahassee, Florida. Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission. 2017. Florida's Endangered and Threatened Species. Official Lists, Bureau of Non -Game Wildlife, Division of Wildlife. Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission. Tallahassee, Florida. Kautz, R., R. Kawula, T. Hoctor, J. Comiskey, D. Jansen, D. Jennings, J. Kasbohm, F. Mazzotti, R. McBride, L. Richardson, K. Root. 2006. How much is enough? Landscape -scale conservation for the Florida panther. Biological Conservation, Volume 130, Issue 1, Pages118-133 Logan, Todd, Andrew C. Eller, Jr., Ross Morrell, Donna Ruffner, and Jim Sewell. 1993. Florida Panther Habitat Preservation Plan South Florida Population. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; Gainesville, Florida. Runde, D.E., J.A. Gore, J.A. Hovis, M.S. Robson, and P.D. Southall. 1991. Florida Atlas of Breeding Sites for Herons and Their Allies, Update 1986 - 1989. Nongame Wildlife Program Technical Report No. 10. Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission, Tallahassee, Florida. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1987. Habitat Management Guidelines for the Bald Eagle in the Southeast Region. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2007. National Bald Eagle Management Guidelines. E4-4 Packet Pg. 115 _ - A3 uris: i - _ AVE O.r p I\�'},' .�...III . SSW-: __.. MARKLEY' tTE EXIT "WASHBURN AVE:, i 1i.�Z:r� F, ��`�?`.�� .��0 .D o .-- ., �:�—c'•„ �'��gE'CK=BL- E. 75 BL-AC.KBU RN=RD CL s'Y3�- `.;" _ :��;....za :.v;F 4' Jt�s':. •} %yaw w. .w - co y�'l' l•r�l'.,.`• , �U': 'lW eL'k''L,.'%�:�. F- �P_. A`. '>r,.tr rw. ('i' 'ir.: -,. ':� •z _. :.; _:& ..�., r.NEWMAN DR WD F' w _' rrqRy� n0 w+'' l ¢ CREWS R'D - . is AkEc WHITAKER;RD----->. _ is ,. mil' 2i •.�' < y- - fl t.i_Q, .._ pMAR:D� m`s LL, •� ..,;ROY' "� r. 7' ,. p.0` �• v:..y-. � `�r- �.'�. r�:: - _,- - ;.. ram'. .,m .,�� _; y.• r..,, ?•T-HO`' "- .n'.L., ..., _ p,:RATT'LE$ NAKE-HAM MOCK RD v z w.. dry ayy m5`.� ,=� e - —*_I:, __ _: SABAL-P-A L-M-RD— y��<'OF VEROt3A%,, �..: , t: Lu 1. ..'. .Si fi FIGURE 1. PROJECT LOCATION MAP a a cc A) J811103 «031B _pa _m-,_+ _mmdn)1 aepuL m AV-o _mu m a_Ljoe m vi ^ j/ \/ / IL �-- - - - -- I - )] ( <(.1 _ z \/ ` k( ) { # �� w\ 4% 3f !, �..�, � \[j ,- � 196US- Q ri a811103 V OMBUSOJ;}eN uan013-L : Z69VO sleiaa;ew dnM3eg pue uoi;eoilddd - 3 ;uewt4oe;;b :;u9wLj3ejjV o H Q ~ W N J p w Z W r ¢ w Z W U m A r J W N = w H Z V W EL J w Q U Q J EL J Y a U m0� a a F Q Q 00 U U U U Li Li LL LL o W o OJ Q LL 00 0 Z W L Z o IWi O Q O z F W l ¢O ¢a 0. jz �0 DU Ft� z Q n Q n J N U Q O p O W N w N w 0 O Z J V K W a< w� =a 3 m 3 wm a N w w a zwN zw 3m o_� zy,o D O O U ¢ m O w O a o oum ounpaw J U Q J U N W a 0 W J J m w V J J W a 0 W U fl F O ¢ O W N 0 F W W W~ a W W~ ~ U� p W. W Z 2 z W. z K U W U U Z N. E �~w w wiz UO a W J L¢ V D: 7 w UO. QO� z Z O Q Qa 2 0 W w Q W Q z �y • • • • • • • :• • •� ' • • • '• • •• • • i .I • • • •• ' • • T• j • • �.r • ' • ♦' • • • • • •� • • • �.•• •� •• • f • ' '• • • • • / • • • • ..• • o . • •• • • • 4 t • . • • 0 • � • • •. • • •• • • • • • • • ' • / i • 'S• •• • •••0• •• '• •• • • ' �� • • •• •• • • ••. •• / .• •• • • • ' • '• i • • • •/ • �' • •• •• •" d 0 4 'i :.04�� • • • • • • i • •.• • • ' • • •.• • ' S • • • • •rR •� } • • • •� • • U • • f ••to • • • • •• •• •t • • i •• ••. • •• • • , • • • •• �. . . . • 00 D rn • • • /// • • go .Mow • ® — x • y . a • • Y ' •�• O S . W an-19 v2jVMV9 v1NVS o., . o m . +' , • a ® • r � ' t • Ob Nava uNnOO z o d w • ' ' o � • U � W .. 0 • . 00 a V a 1:6 k+ � W ca �cG �H Wd 7£:6Z:Z1 6 610VI/7 - OXW'dVW-NOI1V00I-S31a3dS-£-3N001d\S3N001d\SSI\810Z\S19\a31N30 30N3WWOO XYVd M3OWWVH\E£71OS190\900Z\-f 0 lb ((MSV) .taipoD g a)Jeusaµ;ea uanal3-L : Z6946) s)eua;eW do)1oeg pue uoi;eoilddy - D ;uawyoe;;y :;uawyoe;;y - oNH a z o �ti �Hm oz wrcw zm a$ F- z N cYi z& o d aw Quo d¢ w ¢m c NaF "' O ao ao xz� u¢ rQ zQ rn Z C) O U rc Q Q z ar0 az' Ac, -(Obl(1 1131110]) ISb 215- O �c w% t� W W QO yjcn a a811103 Ig 031eusaI;4eb uan013-L : Z69ti6sleiaa;eW dn e 8 p u e u o i; e1 o i ddd - ;u a u ya e ; ; d :; u a u y e ;;y 0N 0 0 V 00 YU) U i Q 3 m � QN ) N~ Yw�owWOawKO m�taJFUaQD0 UyNwZOWFo UN10FFW��K— e flVr n J J DE¢ NUO 0ZuoUO2,dYI^I�F.M z¢w z Ew< Q zwo 03w..a ZFOOp wz3¢ �~UW J z�z�OW�333 o ❑ k � - a a -N oa ai a- O � Q 4� } l ' 0 N asSIV3>i dWVO Lu I o ❑ k � - a a -N oa ai a- O � Q 4� } l ' 0 N asSIV3>i dWVO Lu I Z00 Lu H �I11 w WV ZZ:SS:II 0 6IOZ/9Z/£ - OXW'W9-81-UNtl-S31N3NOOy-NNO1$-DOOM-S-3Nf101d\S3Nf101d\$$I\810Z\$19\a31N30 30Y3WW0O Natld NOOWWtlW\8£71 3.A.d L Gulf of Mexico LEGEND HAMMOCK PARK PANTHER FOCUS AREA PANTHER ZONES 0 PRIMARY ZONE ® SECONDARY ZONE DISPERSAL ZONE 0 PRIMARY DISPERSAL /EXPANSION AREA PROJECT LOCATION N w E 41 1� S 0 5 10 Miles' a NOTES: COUNTY INFORMATION WAS ACQUIRED FROM THE FLORIDA GEOGRAPHIC DATA LIBRARY WEBSITE. ROADWAY NETWORKS WERE ACQUIRED FROM THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION GIS WEBSITE HTTP:/ /W W W. DOT.STATE. FL. US/ PLANNING / STATISTICS/GIS/ROAD.SHTM JULY 2016. PANTHER FOCUS AREA WAS ACQUIRED FROM THE USFWS FTP SITE MARCH 2O07. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY ZONES WERE ACQUIRED FROM (KAUTZ ET AL. 2006Y DRAWN BY DATE FIGURE 6. PANTHER ZONES WITH PANTHER FOCUS AREA RD.B.ED BY DAA� HAMMOCK PARK R.F. 10/5 REVISED DATE f � 2 PASSARELLA w";R sL ASC )(-`T ATi'C „- Packet Pg. 121 3.A.d EXHIBIT 5 AERIAL WITH BALD EAGLE NEST AND PROTECTION ZONES Packet Pg. 122 0 alb ((MSV) .taipoD g a)Jeusaµ;ea uanal3-L : Z6946) s)eua;eW do)1oeg pue uoi;eoilddy - D ;uawyoe;;y :;uawyoe;;y Z O m N m N or x�+w 3Z� oz wrcw � �w Qao z¢ o aw Quo da � w f( N w zHa .04 do ¢o o a M1' r�: aoo w� awLL $" aka"- z a r 0-a z' Ac, -(Obl(1 1131110]) ISb 215- 1- �fi QO yjCf) 3.A.d EXHIBIT 6 AERIAL WITH ON -SITE AND ADJACENT OFF -SITE PRESERVE AREAS Packet Pg. 124 a811103 IS aIeusaIJIBU uan813-L : Z69VIO slepejew dnjoe8 pue uoi;e3ilddd - 3 juauay3L'jjV :juewt43e;: LL N = O Z ,O �ww w' =w W zWm oao Zw W~ o�wia 1 a a orb a~ 00 W w w J w waw 30 w n ti w w o Saw w 3 o r a r; F o� •r z fn <Z � p N i w � Q w 0 (i F Z : W \ J O O 0 t7 W _ 2 J J M 0 Z } 1 + w J w JOQ H �Z 'r� fn w H � = a W ++ z aF- ao f 1j �;xZl FN 1 �1. ,a V 8311100) 196 HD- 00 o ,a V 8311100) 196 HD- 00 o 1--1 x 1 f W ae 9az�9,d wvlZ'01 - bIOZ '9Z avW gl J-BXII:evl 0rn0'sv3atl 3na3s3ad 3iis-3j0 arvv ails-rv0 Hiim lvia3V 9 11BIHX3\+a0day vivo 1via3wxoaina3\810Z\aazn37 30a3wu0� aavd / � a • � , J • yy -r 1!4!r'•1� a+r+l► y` W �. l Ashy .1. i Jj 4 Fb l4 r -- , • � yid ��,,. � . - . ' I Wm- _ -- - 1°r d ke phi In III III :`� •�� yam:. ��: WL Ilk 4."' oo'o((-o[[•Il TIMALDROP 116Y1Cd;R, Hammock Park I 3.A.d I NO OBJECTION CORRESPONDENCE El Q Packet Pg. 127 1 3.A.d From: Fontes, Roland N - Fort Myers, FL To: Alexis Crespo Subject: RE: Letter of No Objection-USPS Date: Thursday, November 12, 2020 1:49:10 PM Attachments: imaae001.Dna image002.g_no WARNING - EXTERNAL EMAIL: PLEASE VERIFY SENDER BEFORE OPENING ATTACHMENTS OR CLICKING ON LINKS. No objection From: Alexis Crespo [mailto:Alexis.Crespo@waldropengineering.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2020 2:34 PM To: Fontes, Roland N - Fort Myers, FL <Roland.N.Fontes@usps.gov> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Letter of No Obi ection-USPS CAUTION: This email originated from outside USPS. STOP and CONSIDER before responding, clicking on links, or opening attachments. Hi Roland — I am working on an automobile service station separation waiver application. The site is at the northeast corner of CR 951 and Rattlesnake Hammock Road. The Applicant is proposing an 8 pump gas station, and it's across CR 951 from a Racetrac. I have attached the location exhibit that shows the site, as well as a site plan. Can you review and provide an email of no objection? Do you need any further information from me? Thanks! Alexis Crespo AICP Senior Vice President — Planning tENGINEERING PLANNItG I CrY`L E140111tEfRiNG LANCW1PE MGmITECTuRE. alexis.crespo(o�waldropengineering.com I waldropengineering.com o (239) 405-7777 1 d (239) 908-3405 1 c (239) 850-8525 BONITA SPRINGS I FORT MYERS I ORLANDO I SARASOTA I TAMPA 28100 Bonita Grande Drive, Suite 305, Bonita Springs, FL 34135 NOTICE. Upon receipt of any electronic file/data from Waldrop Engineering, P.A., you are agreeing to the following: This file/data is for informational purposes only. It is the responsibility of the recipient to reconcile this electronic file/data with the actual project site conditions. Recipient agrees to indemnify and hold harmless Waldrop Engineering, P.A. for any defects or errors in this file/data. Packet Pg. 128 3.A.d From: Fred Drovdlic <Fred.Drovdlic(@waldropengineering.com> Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2020 12:17 PM To: Alexis Crespo <Alexis.Crespo(@waldropengineering.com> Subject: FW: 7-Eleven Immokalee Letter of No Objection -LISPS Ron Fontes Growth Management Coordinator, USPS 239-220-4718 Roland.N.Fontes(@usps.gov Fred Drovdlic AICP Principal Planner / Senior Project Manager 1ki ENGINEERING PLANNID G I rry I c-i SvoEFRiI4G LANC .APE AIRVinECTURE fred.drovdlic(a)waldropengineering.com I waldropengineering.com o (239) 344-0000 1 d (239) 318-6707 1 c (239) 989-3370 FORT MYERS I BONITA SPRINGS I ORLANDO I SARASOTA I TAMPA 1514 Broadway, Suite 201, Fort Myers, FL 33901 NOTICE. Upon receipt of any electronic file/data from Waldrop Engineering, P.A., you are agreeing to the following: This file/data is for informational purposes only. It is the responsibility of the recipient to reconcile this electronic file/data with the actual project site conditions. Recipient agrees to indemnify and hold harmless Waldrop Engineering, P.A. for any defects or errors in this file/data. From: Lauren Evans <levans(@creightondev.com> Sent: Thursday, April 9, 2020 9:46 AM To: Fred Drovdlic <Fred.Drovdlic(@waIdropengineering.com> Subject: FW: 7-Eleven Immokalee Letter of No Objection WARNING - EXTERNAL EMAIL: PLEASE VERIFY SENDER BEFORE OPENING ATTACHMENTS OR CLICKING ON LINKS. FYI Thank you, Lauren Evans levans(@creightondev.com CIDUEIGHT-0-N CONSTRUCTION & MANAGEMENT 900 SW Pine Island Road, Suite 202 Cape Coral, FL 33991 Office: 239-210-0455/Cel l: 239-989-3471/Fax: 239-673-7328 Packet Pg. 129 3.A.d Confidentiality Notice: The information contained in this email and any accompanying ottochment(s) is intended only for the use of the intended recipient and may be confidential and/or privileged. Furthermore, the content of this email is for informational purposes only. If any reader of this communication is not the intended recipient, unauthorized use, disclosure or copying is strictly prohibited, and may be unlawful. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify the sender by return email and delete the original message and all copies from your system. From: Fontes, Roland N - Fort Myers, FL < Sent: Thursday, April 9, 2020 8:52 AM To: Lauren Evans <levans(cDcreightondev.com>; Sue Monroe <smonroeCCDnaplesgov.com> Cc: Lloyd, Michael - Naples, FL <mike.11oyd(@usps.gov>; Marchant, Anna J - Naples, FL <Anna.J.Marchant(@usps.gov> Subject: 7-Eleven Immokalee Letter of No Objection USPS LETTER OF NO OBJECTION DATE: 04-09-2020 The USPS has no objection of the new construction 7-Eleven project listed below. 7-Eleven (#1045471) Immokalee Automobile Service Station Waiver Automobile Service Station Waiver (zoning request) Collier County Case: PL20190001744 Regards, Ron Fontes Growth Management Coordinator, USPS 239-220-4718 Packet Pg. 130 I 3.A.d I MARKET STUDY ANALYSIS El Q Packet Pg. 131 1 I 3.A.d I MARKET ANALYSIS FOR PROPOSED HAMMOCK PARK CONVENIENCE STORE/FUEL � Cn STATION ON COLLIER BOULEVARD IN COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA 0a N 49 M November 16, 2020 W Prepared for cm Iq Wilton Land Company, LLC T C/O Mr. David Torres 7742 Alico Road Fort Myers, FL 33912 �. Prepared by sell Planning-F.e.utio ke lt'. Real Estate Econometrics, Inc. Real Estate Econometrics, Inc. Suite 100 707 Orchid Drive Naples, Florida 34102 (239) 269-1341 Ree-i.Com Packet Pg. 132 1 3.A.d Executive Summary Wilton Land Company LLC ("Applicant") is seeking approval for a proposed convenience store/fuel station ("Project") at the northeast corner of Collier Boulevard (CR 951) and Rattlesnake Hammock Road in Collier County's South Naples planning area. The Project will make a significant contribution to the Collier County economy while at the same time support the rapid growth in the Project's market area (defined in Section 1.1) without adversely affecting the efficient gasoline market economy in that market area. • Gasoline market demand is anticipated to grow 12.74% in the Project's drive time market area over the next five years. • The proposed convenience store/gas station will increase the same gasoline market drive time supply by 8.89%. The proposed Project will keep the drive time gasoline market efficient by providing the needed supply to accommodate the growing demand in Collier County's South Naples planning area. Background The Applicant is seeking to develop a 1.83-acre parcel of land that is a part of the 18.99-acre Hammock Park Commerce Center commercial planned unit development ("CPUD") and located at the northeast corner of Collier Boulevard (CR 951) and Rattlesnake Hammock Road in Collier County's South Naples planning area. The Applicant is proposing a convenience store/fuel station on the property. An amendment to the CPUD and a companion Growth Management Plan amendment was recently passed by the Collier County Commission for up to 265 apartment dwelling units within the CPUD. The existing CPUD ordinance indicates gasoline service stations are an allowable use, subject to the provisions of the LDC governing facilities with fuel pumps (LDC 5.05.05). The carwash is permitting within the CPUD as an accessory use to the gas station. There is currently no limit on the number of pumps noted in the CPUD ordinance. The CPUD does not have site development regulations that are specific to gas stations, therefore the requirements of Collier County LDC 5.05.05 will apply. Packet Pg. 133 3.A.d The Applicant proposes to construct a new 6,500 sf convenience store and free- standing fuel canopy with 8 MPDs (16 fueling positions) on an outparcel at the southwest corner of the parcel. A single bay self -serve automatic carwash is also proposed. Collier County Code requires 500 feet separation between gas stations and a RaceTrac gas station is located within 500 feet of the Project. Therefore, an Automobile Service Station Waiver ("ASW") is required. Along with a public hearing, the ASW also requires a gas station needs analysis for the Project. Real Estates Econometrics, Inc. ("Consultant") has been retained to analyze the fuel market for the Applicant. The Consultant is well -versed in preparing needs analysis studies especially in the Southwest Florida marketplace. This Study is comprised of three (3) parts; the market area demographics, the market analysis and conclusion. 1.0 Market Area Demographics 1.1 Market Area Definition Since the convenience store/fuel station market is being analyzed, it is appropriate to define the market area for such use by using a drive time calculation. Drive times are calculated by Environmental Systems Research Institute ("ESRI"). The ESRI Business Analyst mapping program is geographic information system -based ("GIS") that calculates market area drive times by actual street networks and posted speed limits and allows for the extraction of census data from that drive time market area. A March 1, 2017 study by the National Association of Convenience Stores ("NACS") on how consumers behave at the pump (See Appendix A) shows that consumers are attracted to convenience store/fuel station facilities based on a number of factors including: • Price • Location Convenience • Brand • Ease of ingress/egress 2 Packet Pg. 134 3.A.d As most consumers of a convenience store/fuel station facility are drawn to that facility based primarily on the four factors noted above, it would stand to reason that an immediate market area would include driving within 5-minutes to such a facility to obtain fuel. Most consumers would be fueling as a secondary action while driving for other reasons such as going to the grocery store or traveling to and from work. The above factors indicate that a convenience store/fuel facility market analysis would encompass a 5-minute drive time market area ("Market Area"). Figure 1.1.1 below depicts the Market Area for the Project. Figure 1.1.1 Source: ESRI ArcGIS Business Analyst Mapping System The Market Area configuration will change over time as growth occurs in the area and new roads with new residences are developed. That is important to note when the Market Area demographic detail is reviewed over the next five years in the next section. Packet Pg. 135 3.A.d 1.2 Market Area Demographic Detail In order to determine the convenience store/fuel station facility demand, a demographic profile of the Market Area is required. The Consultant utilized the Environmental Systems Research Institute's ("ESRI") geographic information systems ("GIS") both desktop and web -based. ESRI's Business Analyst on-line and ArcGIS desktop programs allow for the most current data collecting at the local level. Table 1.2.1 below shows the census -based demographic profile of the population that lives within the Market Area of the subject site. Table 1.2.1 Q M aI Demographic and tncorne Profile Hammock Park Gas 5tatron Prepared by ESri 851O Collier Bird, Naples, Florlda, 34114 Drive Time: 5 minute radlus summeiry cenaua 2010 2019 2024 pvpulatlen 9,637 12,773 14,451 Hausaholds 4,808 6,218 7,c10 Fsmlii25 3,065 4,072 4,612 Ayeraga Household Size 1.96 2.02 2.03 Owner Occupied Housing Una% 3, 806 4,663 5,462 Renter OCcppied Housing Units 1,002 1,555 1,508 Median Age 63-8 65.0 69.7 hands: 2019 - 2024 Annual Rate Arne Starke Natmnal Populauan L50% 11 a7% 0,77% Heusahoids 2.43% 1.31% 0.75% Famllies 2152% 1.26% 0168% Owner HHs 2199% 1,50% 0,92% Magian Household Income 4,21% 2.37% 2.701% 2019 2024 HausetholWs by Income Numbee percent Number Percent ,$15,000 376 6,O% 310 4AW. $15000 - $24, 999 494 7-9% 403 517% $25:000 - $34,999 421 6.a% 357 5.1% $35,000-$49, 999 1,919 161% 931 13.3% TISO,coo-s74, 999 1,228 19-7% 1, 313 18.7% $75,000-09, 999 847 13.6% 1,037 14.6% S10a,P00 - $149999 961 15-5% 1,297 18,5% 515P,000-S199:999 316 5.1% 512 7.3% $200, 000+ 556 8.9% 85O 12.1% Median Household Income $63,9315 578,558 Arerage Household income $94,291 $1141935 Per Capita Incoma $45,419 $55,O08 Censaa 2010 203.9 2024 POPOr an by Apo Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent 0-4 310 3.2% 405 3.2% 446 1.1% 5 - 9 272 218% 362 2.8% 38B 2,7% 10- 14 241 2.5% 310 2.4% 34$ 2,4% I$ - 19 246 2-" 308 2,4% 343 2A% 2O • 24 268 2,8% 36S 2,9 % 383 2.7% 25 - 34 W 6.6% 880 6.9% 933 6.5% 35 - 44 614 6.4-A 742 5.8% 843 S.8% 45 - 54 $33 8.646 ni. 7.2% 951 6-614 55-64 1,635 17.0% 7,006 15-3% 2,27E 15.8% 6S-74 2,443 25.3iya 3, 524 27,6% 4,119 28.5% 75. 84 1,607 16.7% 2, 058 16.1% 2, 547 17.646 85+ 530 5-5% 811 6.3% S73 6.Onb Genaus 2010 2019 2024 Raw and Ethnicity Number Parr t Number Parrent Number Percent White Alone 805 !go,l% 1d,834 84.8% 11,930 412.6% Black Alone 514 5.3% 1,088 8,5'Yx 11422 9.8% American Indlan Along 18 012% 26 0.2% 32 a 2% Asian Alan@ 59 0.7% 123 IV* 168 1,2% Pacific Islander AiPna 3 0-0% 3 010% 5 010% Some Other Rue Alone 257 2,7% 532 4,2% 699 4_0-S Two or More Races 91 0,9°4, 166 1,3% 205 1.4% Hispanic Origin (Any Race) 1,220 12.7% 2,239 1715% 2,933 20.3% bale Notes tnwmc is a".ed In nKrenr do1IM4 T.- V.S. Census dmaeau, Canton 2Q SB Summary nk 1. Earl F.,-M for 7d14 and .n2S Source: ESRI and U.S. Census Bureau 0 Packet Pg. 136 3.A.d In 2019, the population for the Market Area is 12,773 and the number of households is 14,451. The majority of household incomes range from $35,000 to $150,000 and the median household income of the Market Area is $63,936. The average household income for this market area is $94,291. Table 1.2.2 below shows the workforce makeup of the Market Area. The workforce makes up 33.49% of the total market area population and will be significant contributors to the product sales of the convenience store/fuel station. The majority of the workforce is in the services industry and is white collar in occupation. Table 1.2.2 esri- Market Profile Hammock Park Gas Station 8510 Collier Blvd, Naples, Florida, 34114 Drive Time: 6 minute radii Prepared by Esri 5 minutes 2019 Employed Population 16+ by Industry Tota I 4,265 Agriculture/Mining 1.711. Construction 6.0 % Manufacturing 1.8 % Wholesale Trade 1.0% Retail Trade 15.S%o Transportation/ lJtilities 1.2% Information 2.1% Finance/Insurance/Real Estate 5.4% Se rvices 61.31A Public Administration 4.1% 2019 Employed Population 16+ by Occupation Total 4,266 White Collar 54.41A Management/Business/Financial 10.3% Professional 15.7% Sales 14.7% Administrative Support 13.7% Services 33.9% Blue Collar 11.8% Farming/Forestry/Fishing 1.9% Construction/Extraction 1.8% Installation/Maintenance/Repair 3.3% Production 1.4 % Transportation/Material Moving 3.4% Source: ESRI and U.S. Census Bureau 5 Packet Pg. 137 3.A.d 2.0 MARKET ANALYSIS 2.1 Market Area Demand The Consultant next determined the market area demand for gasoline in 2019 and then over a 5-year period to 2024 in order to calculate the future demand for gasoline coming from the Market Area. Table 2.1.1 shows that the market area's 2019 population is 12,773 and the persons per household is 2.02 as taken from Table 1.2.1 and equates to a household count of 6,218 per ESRI. The household count is required since the annual amount spent on fuel in the Market Area is calculated on a per household basis. Table 2.1.1 Population 12,773 Persons Per Household 2.02 Households 6,218 Source: ESRI and U.S. Census Bureau In order to determine the 2024 population for the same Market Area, the Consultant then utilized the population projection from Table 1.2.1. The table and its forecasts are based on census data. Table 2.1.2 below shows that the Market Area population is projected to increase by 1,678 people between 2019 and 2024. Table 2.1.2 Year 5-Minute Drive Time Population 2019 12,773 2024 14,451 Increase: 1,678 Source: ESRI and US Census Bureau The next step in calculating the demand for gasoline from the Market Area is to determine the number of gallons of fuel consumed annually in the Market Area. The Consultant utilized the U.S. Census population data for the Market Area and combined it with the U.S. Census automotive expenditures data (Appendix B) and the Market Area average price to calculate the Market Area's annual consumption of gasoline. Table 2.1.3 on the next page shows the calculation. The Consultant made the same calculation for both 2019 and 2024 6 Packet Pg. 138 3.A.d Table 2.1.3 2019 2024 Population 12,773 14,451 Households 6,218 7,010 Average Amount spent on gas per Household $2,502.67 $2,502.67 Total Amount Spent in market area $15,561,602.06 $17,543,716.70 Average gasoline price per gallon (from Appendix C): $2.29 $2.269 Gallons Consumed Annually in Market Area: 6,795,459 7,661,012 Demand Increase from 2019 to 2024: 12.74% Source: ESRI, Automotive Aftermarket Expenditures, Consultant Field Study (Appendix C) The annual gallons of fuel consumed in the market area will increase by 865,552 which equates to a Market Area demand increase of 12.74% over the five-year period. 2.2 Market Area Supply In order to determine the impact the Project will have on the supply, the Consultant first needs to identify the existing gas stations in the Market Area, then calculate the number of cars using the existing gas stations on a weekly basis and finally determine the number of cars that would be using the Project's fuel to ascertain the percent growth the Project's supply will have on the total Market Area supply. The Consultant first used the same Market Area drive time to determine the number of competitive gas stations located within the boundaries of the Market Area. Figure 2.2.1 on the next page shows the competitive gas stations in light blue as they geographically relate to the Project location (red star). (Rest of Page Left Intentionally Blank) 7 Packet Pg. 139 3.A.d Figure 2.2.1 Source: ESRI, Collier County Property Appraiser, DOR List with Consultant Field Study (Appendix C) There are 12 gas stations within the Market Area boundary and all are convenience store/fuel stations. The list of the competitive stations, their makeup and photos are located in Appendix C. The Consultant then utilized NACS data to examine the supply side of the competition in the Market Area. The NACS 2015 Fuel Report (Appendix D, Page 30) along with the American Independent Business Alliance ("AMIBA") report (Appendix E, Page 2) points out that big box mass merchandise stores sell 278,000 gallons of gasoline per month and that amount is more than half of the amount sold by convenience store/fuel station locations. Based on that statistic, the Consultant used 270,000 gallons as a base amount and used 50% (135,000) of that amount as the average amount of gallons sold per month at a convenience store/fuel station location. There was no state, regional or local data available. From that point, the Consultant calculated the 12-station Market Area gallons sold during the weekday for a week. Table 2.2.1 on the next page shows that calculation. Packet Pg. 140 3.A.d Table 2.2.1 Station Gallons per Month: 135,000 Station Gallons per week: 33,750 Station Gallons for 5 weekdays: 24,107 Stations: 12 Market Area Gallons per 5-day week: 289,286 Source: NACS 2015 Fuel Report (Appendix D) and AMIBA Report (Appendix E) The Project's contribution in terms of total supply is then added to the Market Area total so that the number of cars per 5-day week could be determined. Table 2.2.2 below shows that calculation. Table 2.2.2 Market Area Gallons per 5-day week: 289,286 Project Contribution per 5-day week: 24,107 Market Area Gallons per 5-day week with Project: 313,393 Source: Consultant The next step is to calculate the number of gallons per week that is consumed per car in the marketplace. A cars per household statistic is required for this calculation. The Consultant utilized a study by Governing, a highly regarded media platform covering politics, policy and management for state and local government leaders (Appendix F). Each car uses 10.86 gallons per week in the Market Area. This calculation is shown in Table 2.2.3 below. Table 2.2.3 Drive Time Population 12,773 Drive Time Households 6,218 Annual Fuel Cost per Household $2,502.67 Cars Per Household (Appendix F) 1.78 Annual Fuel Cost per Car $1,405.99 Avg. Market Area Price per Gallon (Appendix C) $2.49 Annual Gallons Consumed per Car 564.66 Weeks per Year 52 Gallons Per Car Per Week 10.86 Source: ESRI, Automotive Aftermarket Expenditures, Consultant Field Study (Appendix C), Governing calculations of 2015 and 2016 one-year Census American Community Survey M Packet Pg. 141 3.A.d The next calculation is to convert the gallons per 5-day week to cars purchasing those gallons in the Market Area in order to compare to the cars per 5-day week as calculated by the Project traffic study that will purchase fuel at the Project. Table 2.2.4 shows that calculation. Table 2.2.4 Market Area Gallons per 5-day week with Project (from Table 2.2.2): 313,393 Gallons per car per week (from Table 2.2.3): 10.86 Cars per 5-day week in Market Area: 28,861 Source: Consultant The number of cars per 5-day week for the Project is the next calculation needed to compare the Project's contribution to the supply. Using the Project's traffic study (Appendix G) and a study performed by C-Store Shopper Insights (Appendix H), the Consultant determined that 1,918 cars will be purchasing gasoline at the Project's fuel stations over a 5-weekday period. Table 2.2.5 below shows that calculation. Table 2.2.5 Cars buying Gasoline at the Project during 5-Weekday period Weekday Per hour am (4 hours) Weekday Per hour pm (4 hours) Total Cars in per weekday: C-Store data: 69% cars in for gas Project cars buying gas over 5-weekdays: Per hour Total Cars in 100 400 86 344 744 69.00% 513 2,567 Source: Project Traffic Study (Appendix G), page 7. C-Store Shopper Insights, Page 1 (Appendix H) The Project's percentage of contribution to the Market Area supply is the last calculation. Table 2.2.6 below shows that the Project will contribute 2,567 fuel purchasers to the Market Area, equating to a Market Area supply increase of 8.89% Table 2.2.6 Market Area cars per 5-weekdays including Project (from Table 2.2.4): 28,861 Project cars per 5-weekdays (from Table 2.2.5): 2,567 Project Supply percent increase to the Market Area Supply: 8.89% Source: Consultant 10 Packet Pg. 142 3.A.d 2.3 Supply — Demand Analysis The final step in the Market Study supply -demand analysis is to put the supply and demand calculations together in order to determine the oversupply or undersupply of gasoline in the Market Area with the addition of the Project. Table 2.3.1 shows that over the next five years there will be a 3.85% deficit supply of gasoline to serve the Market Area over the next five (5) years. A basic economic principal states that all markets are efficient and that supply is for the most part generated as demand dictates. It is a rare economic situation where supply generates demand. This basic economic principal shows that markets are efficient in terms of supply and demand and the ultimate lack of available fuel station choices creates an impediment to the market functioning properly. The economic principal stated above would indicate that fuel station supply will be added to the Market Area in order to equalize the demand side of the Market Area's supply/demand equation. The Project will increase the Market Area's supply side by 8.89% thus stabilizing the Market Area's supply/demand equation for the next five (5) years. There will still be a 3.85% supply deficit in the next five (5) years even with the Project addition to the supply. Table 2.3.1 Market Area Demand Growth (Table 2.1.3) 12.74% Project percent of market (Table 2.2.6) 8.89% Market Area 5-year supply = surplus/(deficit) (3.85%) The addition of the Project will not only satisfy the increased demand over the next five (5) years, it will also keep gasoline prices reasonable by absorbing a majority of the five (5) year projected demand increase and not constraining the gasoline supply thus forcing gas prices to escalate. The Project will compensate for properties along the Market Area corridor that may not be developed as convenience store/fuel stations due to being unavailable for sale or subject to other development constraints. And the Project will be new to the market in terms of construction and exterior ambiance thus providing an upgrade to the Collier Boulevard development corridor and potentially force older gas station/convenience store competitors to upgrade their exterior and interior appearances. Packet Pg. 143 3.A.d 3.0 CONCLUSIONS 3.1 The Consultant used all of the data and analysis in the previous sections to determine the total supply and demand for gasoline sales in the Project's market area for the next five years. From there, the Consultant then determined the Project's impact on the Market Area in terms of the Market Area's percent of demand growth versus the Market Area's percent of supply increase with the addition of the Project's supply. The results show compellingly that the addition of the Project to the Market Area will not adversely affect the balance of gasoline supply while addressing the demand coming from the future growth and make significant economic contributions to Collier County in terms of gas taxes, sales taxes and property taxes. The Market Area is currently assumed to be in equilibrium as economic studies have shown that markets are efficient in terms of supply and demand and the future supply will be developed as the market grows and diversifies. The Project will help address the demand coming to the Market Area over the next five years. Based on the analysis, there will be even more of a gasoline supply need for the Market Area over the next five (5) years and beyond even with the addition of the Project. 12 Packet Pg. 144 3.A.d APPENDIX A 15 El Q Packet Pg. 145 How Consumers Behave at the Pump I NACS Online — Your Business _ httpJhvww.nacson"e.com/YourBusiness/,FuelsCenter/Bas Ask NACS Conexxus Terms of Use Advertise 1600 Duke Street About NACS Fueis Institute Privacy Policy For Suppliers Alexandria, Va 22314 Foundation Related Glossary Copyright d 2017 NACS Associations THE ASSOCIATION FOR CONVENIENCE & FUEL RETAILING NAGS Online About Basics Articles Multimedia News Research Basics 1 Articles 1 How Consumers Behave at the Pump HOW CONSUMERS BEHAVE AT THE PUMP l Ain Looking For_ Search this site... p Nearly40 million Americans fill up their vehicles every day. How they drive, consider gas prices and determine whether they go inside the stare has a profound impact on convenience stores. RELATED ARTICLES By NACS Published: 311/2017 10 Jam' What Consumers Say About Tags: Consumers; Pay at the Pump ,;No- Fueling By NAGS Read Mcre Nearly 40 million Americans fill up their vehicles every day. How they drive, consider gas prices and determine whether to shop inside a convenience store for food, snacks and beverages has a ii- Are You Average? profound impact on the retail channel that sells 80% of the fuel purchased in the United States. Let's -By NACS Read M,3re look at some of the broad characteristics of how consumers buy gas and examine how convenience retailers can keep them coming back. In particular, we examine: • Consumer behavior at the pump • What retailers can do to change consumer behavior • Overall driving habits NACS has surveyed consumers about their perceptions related to gas prices since 2007 and has conducted monthly consumer sentiment surveys since 2013. NACS commissioned Penn, Schoen and Berland Associates LLC to conduct 1,114 online interviews with adult Americans on January 3-6. 2017. The margin of error for the entire sample is +!- 2.95 % at the 95% confidence interval and higher for subgroups_ Below are the questions and overall responses. Consumer Behavior at the Pump Understanding how consumers feel about gasoline prices can help convenience retailers execute their marketing strategies. it's also important to determine how consumers buy gas, which reveals some interesting variations. Filling Up the Tank Consumers are more likely to buy gas during the evening rush than the morning daypart (36% vs. 22%), likely because of morning time pressures. But these time pressures vary by demographic. Those most likely to purchase fuel in the morning are consumers age 34-49 who generally face time pressures related to organizing family activities, etc. There may be an opportunity to focus marketing on this segment to encourage more breakfast items. Meanwhile, those age 50 and older are most likely to purchase gas mid -day, outside of rush hours. A promotional campaign around slowing down and enjoying a snack or meal inside the store might appeal to this demographic. G: What time of the day do you often purchase gas? (%) Gas Consumers 2017 Morning, or roughly 6 am to 10 am Mid -day, or roughly 10 am to 3 pm Age 18-34 35.49 50+ 22 19 28 21 32 27 25 41 00 rSurvey Says.__ , By NACS Magazine Read More Packet Pg. 146 How Consumers Behave at the Pump � NACS Online — Your Business — ... http://Www.nacsonline.com/YourBusiness/FuelsCenter/Ba3.A.d Afternoon, or roughly 3 pm to 7 pm 36 41 37 32 Night, or roughly 7 pm to midnight 9 13 10 6 Overnight, or roughly midnight to 6 am 1 0 1 0 Most fueling sites offer three octane grades: regular (usually 87 octane), mid -grade (usually 89 octane), and premium (usually 92 or 93 octane). Regular octane is the dominant fuel, while those who buy higher -octane fuels are likely doing so because their vehicle requires it There are some variations by age; younger consumers are the least interested in mid -grade as a fueling option. Q: What octane grade do you typically purchase for the vehicle you most commonly drive? (%) Gas Consumers 2017 Gender Age M F 18-34 35-49 50, Regular 82 80 84 82 78 86 Mid -grade 8 10 7 5 11 5 Premium a 10 7 11 10 5 Other 1 0 1 0 1 1 Don't know 0 0 1 1 0 0 Fuliy three quarters of consumers pay by plastic (73%). The percentage of consumers who pay by plastic has increased by 9 percentage points between 2009 and 2017. In reviewing subcategories, debit cards are most used by females (41 %) and those age 18-34 (45%). Credit cards are most popular with those age 50 and older (47%). Q: Which payment method do you typically use to purchase gas? Track (°!o) Gas Consumers 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2009 Cash 26 28 23 27 27 33 35 Credit 36 34 40 37 35 41 37 Debit 37 38 38 36 37 24 27 Total debit and credit 73 72 78 73 72 65 64 Shopping on Price The rise of mobile commerce, apps and price -checking wobsites make it easier for consumers to shop for deals and "steals" on everything from appliances to new shoes, a mentality that also carries over to gasoline. Simply put, no matter what the price per gallon is, consumers want to find the best price they can. Approximately two in three consumers have consistently shopped on price, whether gas was as low as $1.62 per gallon at the start of 2009, or as high as $3.28 per gallon at the start of 2013. However, a focus on price is diminishing and has fallen 10 percentage points in just two years. Location has grown more important to consumers, as well as the in-store food offer. The price per gallon is least important to those who over the past 30 days who bought a sandwich at a place where they also purchased gas (58%)- 0: When buying gas, which of the following factors is important to you? Track N Gas Consumers 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2009 Price 61 64 71 66 71 63 70 Location of storefstation 25 20 18 20 18 20 19 Brand 8 9 8 8 8 8 9 Ease of entrance or exit 4 6 3 4 2 6 - Other 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 So how do price -sensitive consumers shop by price? The traditional gas price sign remains the most common method, particularly among drivers during the morning rush (65%). Loyalty cards are a second choice and are used by one fn seven (16%) price -sensitive consumers. Q L d O U 06 N Y C rn (D W W C N d W ti N O) to Packet Pg. 147 3.A.d APPENDIX B 16 El Q Packet Pg. 148 Hammock Park Gas Station Prepared by Esr 8510 Collier Blvd, Naples, Florida, 34114 Latitude: 26.1104� Drive Time: 6 minute radius Longitude:-81.6862: Demographic Summary 2019 2024 Population 12,773 14,451 Households 6,218 7,010 Families 4,072 4,612 Median Age 65.0 65.7 Median Household Income $63,936 $78,558 Spending Potential Average Amount Index Spent Total Payments on Vehicles excluding Leases 114 $2,886.11 $17,945,805 Gasoline and Motor Oil Gasoline 113 $2,502.6t $15,561,605 Diesel Fuel 154 $82.85 $515,149 Motor Oil 136 $21.03 $130,750 Other Vehicle Expenses Vehicle Maintenance & Repairs 117 $1,338.57 $8,323,245 Vehicle Coolant/Brake/Transmission Fluids 123 $10.65 $66,218 Tire Purchase/Replacement 130 $233.38 $1,451,163 Vehicle Parts/Equipment/Accessories 124 $81.18 $504747 Vehicle Accessories including Labor 127 $15.21 $94:591 Vehicle Cleaning Services including Car Washes 102 $28.31 $176,062 Miscellaneous Auto Repair/Servicing 97 $154.01 $957,656 Vehicle Body Work & Painting 118 $43.84 $272,628 Vehicle or Engine Repairs 117 $289.75 $1,801,650 Vehicle Motor Tune-up 129 $63.48 $394,726 Lube/Oil Change & Oil Filters 116 $137.89 $857,418 Vehicle Front End Alignment/Wheel Balance & 131 $40.45 $251,508 Vehicle Shock Absorber Replacement 104 $15.92 $98,986 Tire Repair and Other Repair Work 111 $166.44 $1,034,933 Auto Repair Service Policy 140 $58.05 $360,960 Vehicle Insurance 114 $1,765.30 $10,976,640 Rental of Vehicles excluding Trips 110 $61.25 $380,852 Leased Vehicles 100 $403.44 $2,508,618 Basic Lease Charge for Cars/Trucks 98 $351.42 $2,185,160 Car/Truck Lease Fees & Down Payments 117 $52.02 $323,458 Vehicle Pers Property Taxes/State & Local Registr Fees 127 $239.80 $1,491,068 Driver's License Fees 109 $13.70 $85,215 Vehicle Inspection Fees 114 $18.00 $111,943 Parking Fees & Tolls excluding Trips 80 $92.24 $573,551 Parking Fees excluding Residence (Not on Trips) 79 $45.23 $281,255 Tolls/Electronic Toll Passes excluding Trips 81 $47.01 $292,296 Towing Charges 94 $6.26 $38,949 Auto Service Clubs & GPS Services 126 $44.95 $279,526 Data Note: The Spending Potential Index (SPI) is household -based, and represents the amount spent for a product or service relative to a national average of 100. Source: Esri forecasts for 2019 and 2024; Consumer Spending data are derived from the 2016 and 2017 Consumer Expenditure Surveys, Bureau of Labor Statistics Packet Pg. 149 3.A.d APPENDIX C El Q Packet Pg. 150 3.A.d HAMMOCK PARK DRIVE TIME AREA COMPETITIVE CONVENIENCE STORES/FUEL STATIONS DOR Facilities Convenience Map ID Facilty Name Site Address Report Status Store MPDs Pumps 87 Octane 89 Octane 93 Octane 1 RaceTrac 8485 DAVIS BLVD OPEN YES 8 16 2.16 2.46 2.76 2 Circle K - Shell 8600 RADIO LN OPEN YES 3 6 2.16 2.53 2.80 3 Shell 3835 WHITE LAKE BLVD OPEN YES 6 12 2.16 2.53 2.80 4 Marathon 8901 DAVIS BLVD OPEN YES 8 16 2.39 2.89 3.09 5 Shell 3825 TOLLGATE BLVD OPEN YES 6 12 2.59 2.89 3.09 6 Mobil 8900 DAVIS BLVD OPEN YES 8 16 2.40 2.90 3.00 7 RaceTrac 8483 COLLIER BLVD OPEN YES 8 16 2.23 2.53 2.83 8 RaceTrac 11700 TAMIAMI TRL E OPEN YES 8 16 2.00 2.30 2.60 9 WaWa 12456 TAMIAMI TRL E OPEN YES 8 16 2.00 2.30 2.60 10 7-11 Mobile 12750 TAMIAMI TRL E OPEN YES 6 12 2.69 3.00 3.30 11 Circle K - Shell 12800 TAMIAMI TRL E OPEN YES 4 8 2.69 3.06 3.31 12 Murphy Oil 6630 COLLIER BLVD OPEN YES 8 16 1.96 2.26 2.56 81 162 $2.29 $2.64 $2.90 Packet Pg. 151 3.A.d RaceTrac 8485 Davis Boulevard 8 Stations — 16 pumps Map Location 1 87 Octane $2.16 89 Octane $2.46 93 Octane $2.76 Packet Pg. 152 3.A.d Circle K - Shell 8600 Radio Road 3 Stations — 6 pumps a, 0� Diesel Regular 10 L:, 10 Map Location 2 87 Octane $2.16 89 Octane $2.53 93 Octane $2.80 Packet Pg. 153 3.A.d Shell 3835 White Lake Boulevard 6 Stations — 12 pumps Map Location 3 87 Octane 89 Octane 93 Octane $2.16 $2.53 $2.80 Packet Pg. 154 3.A.d Marathon 8901 Davis Boulevard 8 Stations — 16 pumps Map Location 4 87 Octane 89 Octane 93 Octane $2.39 $2.89 $3.09 Packet Pg. 155 3.A.d Shell 3825 Tollgate Boulevard 6 Stations — 12 pumps Map Location 5 87 Octane 89 Octane 93 Octane $2.59 $2.89 $3.39 Packet Pg. 156 3.A.d Mobil Map Location 6 8900 Davis Boulevard 8 Stations — 16 pumps w -------------- $900 Regular Oft 1 'XXOH , Mobil Diesel Mobil :REDIT • w w -r 87 Octane 89 Octane 93 Octane $2.40 $2.90 $3.00 Packet Pg. 157 3.A.d RaceTrac 8483 Collier Boulevard 8 Stations — 16 pumps Map Location 7 87 Octane 89 Octane 93 Octane $2.23 $2.53 $2.83 Packet Pg. 158 3.A.d RaceTrac 11700 Tamiami Trail East 8 Stations — 16 pumps Map Location 8 87 Octane 89 Octane 93 Octane $2.00 $2.30 $2.60 Packet Pg. 159 3.A.d 12456 Tamiami Trial East 8 Stations — 16 pumps Map Location 9 87 Octane 89 Octane 93 Octane $2.00 $2.30 $3.60 Packet Pg. 160 3.A.d 7-11 Mobile 12750 Tamiami Trail East 6 Stations — 12 pumps Map Location 10 87 Octane 89 Octane 93 Octane $2.69 $3.00 $3.30 Cn Q ! 6 U 0a N 19 M c N d R w c d d W ti N G1 w T Packet Pg. 161 3.A.d Map Location 11 Circle K - Shell 12800 Tamiami Trail East 4 Stations — 8 pumps i ft oil Diesel 87 Octane 89 Octane 93 Octane $2.69 $3.06 $3.31 Packet Pg. 162 3.A.d Map Location 12 Murphy Oil 6630 Collier Boulevard 8 Stations — 16 pumps 6 - - - -- AN 87 Octane 89 Octane 93 Octane $1.96 $2.26 $2.56 Packet Pg. 163 3.A.d APPENDIX D 18 El Q Packet Pg. 164 3.A.d 2 W N O� Packet Pg. 165 3.A.d Major Oil Keeps Its Brand Presence While the major oil companies are withdrawing from retail operations, their brands remain. In fact, roughly half of retail outlets sell fuel under the brand of one of the 15 largest refiner -suppliers. Virtually all of these branded loca- tions are operated by independent entrepreneurs who have signed a supply contract with a particular refiner/distributor to sell a specific brand of fuel, but these retailers do not share in the profit/loss of their suppliers. The remaining 5o % sold "unbranded" fuel. These stations often are owned by companies that have established their own fuel brand (i.e., QuikTrip, Wawa, 7-Eleven) and purchase fuels either on the open market or via unbranded con- tracts with a refiner/distributor. Other Retail Channels Sell Fuels Convenience stores sell more than 8o% of the fuels purchased in the United States, and their dominance continues to grow. Over the past decade, the number of convenience stores selling fuels has grown by 15% (from i1o,895 to 127,588 stores). Meanwhile, the overall number of fueling locations has dropped. There were i52,995 total retail fueling sites in the United States in 2013, the last year measured by the now -defunct National Petroleum News' Market - Facts. This was a steep and steady decline since 1994, when the station count topped zo2,800 sites. Another channel also has seen growth over the past decade: big -box grocery stores and mass merchandising stores, otherwise known as "hypermarkets." As of May 2014, the 5,236 hypermarket retail fueling sites sold an estimated 13.8% of the motor fuels (gasoline) purchased in the United States, according to Energy Analysts International. These sites sell approximately 278,000 gal- lons per month, more than twice the volume of a traditional fuels retailer. The top five hypermarkets selling fuel, by store count: • Kroger (I,220) • Walmart (999 stations, mainly Murphy USA with small mix of others; up to zoo new Murphy USA sites are due by end of 2oi5 per agreement) • Sam's Club (5o5) • Costco (381) • Safeway (346) (Source: Energy Analysts International) The remainder of fuels sales in the United States comes from traditional ser- vice stations without convenience operations and very low -volume fueling sites, such as at marinas. 2015 NACS Retail Fuels R Packet Pg. 166 3.A.d APPENDIX E 19 El Q Packet Pg. 167 be the fuel of choice for U.S. drivers. There arPLEIE 19"1'CL1t DRIVERS in the United States, and there are 122,000 CONVENIENCE that sell 8 0 % of the gasoline sold in the country to keep U.S. drive 6 fueled up and on their way. Snapshot of the average U.S. driver: 33 Miles The average driver travels about 33 miles per day 0 ericans each day by Cdrivingcarpooling °o ® 59% 30 Gallons of gas customerssa consume that price is the ma bou Ions consideration for wh per year they fuel up t5 y A in a ere A 44 o 5 /o also go inside the of gas customers convenience store to buy pay with a credit or food and beverages, or use debit card the ATM or restroom 52 Minutes The average driver commutes 26 minutes each way to/from work �R41-0 Fueled and on their way When do most Americans fill up? . HA- ruels Resource Center; U.S. Energy Information Administration; U.S. Census Bureau) NA S Fuels Resource Center W (D W Get an insider's view of ho, U.S. convenience storc keep millions of drivel filled up and on their way at conveni packet Pg. 168 3.A.d APPENDIX F 20 El Q Packet Pg. 169 3.A.d 2726 OAK RIDGE COURT, SUITE 503 'A FORT MYERS, FL 33901-9356 TRANSPORTATION OFFICE 239.278.1906 Tr% CONSULTANTS , I N C FAX 239.278.906 TRAFFIC ENGINEERING TRANSPORTATION PLANNING SIGNAL SYSTEMS/DESIGN TRAFFIC IMPACT STATEMENT FOR GAS/CONVENIENCE STORE *RATTLESNAKE HAMMOCK & COLLIER COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA (MAJOR STUDY REVIEW - $1,500) (METHODOLOGY REVIEW FEE - $500) PROJECT NO. F2003.08 PREPARED BY: TR Transportation Consultants, Inc. Certificate of Authorization Number: 27003 2726 Oak Ridge Court, Suite 503 Fort Myers, Florida 33901-9356 (239) 278-3090 March 13, 2020 Packet Pg. 170 3.A.d TRANSPORTATION 7ATRCONSULTANTS, INC Table 3 Pass -by Trip Reduction Factors Uas/Uonvemence Store ra, Rattlesnake Hammock & Uollier Land Use I Percentage Trip Reduction u Gasoline/Service Station With 50% AM/ PM Convenience Market Table 4 Trip Generation —New Trips Gas/Convenience Store {a. Rattlesnake Hammock & Collier Weekday A.M. Peak Hour Weekday P.M. Peak Hour Daily Land Use (2-way) In out Total In Out Total Super Convenience MarkeklGas Station 200 200 400 171 171 342 3,881 (4,633 Sq. Ft. C-Store & 16 Rc- Fueling Positions) Less 50%Pass-By -100 -100 -200 -85 -85 -170 -1,941 New Trips = 100 200 86 172 1,940 The trips the proposed development is anticipated to generate as shown in Table 4 were then assigned to the surrounding roadway network. The new trips anticipated to be added to the surrounding roadway network were assigned based upon the routes drivers are anticipated to utilize to approach the subject site. Figure A-1, included in the Appendix of this report, illustrates the percent project traffic distribution and assignment of the net new project trips- Figure A-2, included in the Appendix of this report, illustrates the percent project traffic distribution and assignment of pass -by trips. Figure 2 illustrates the resulting assignment of all project related trips (net new + pass -by). V. PROJECTED CONCURRENCY In order to determine which roadway segments surrounding the site will be significantly impacted, Table 1A, contained in the Appendix, was created. This table indicates which roadway links will accommodate an amount of project traffic greater than the 2%-2%-3% Significance Test. The net new trips generated as a result of the proposed rezoning Page 7 Packet Pg. 171 3.A.d APPENDIX G 21 n V El A r a Packet Pg. 172 Fueling Sales Inside and Out I CSP Daily News http://wwwespdailynews.conVprint/csp-magazine/article/fu INDUSTRY MEWS MERGERS & ACQUISITIONS FUELS DATA SPONSORED CONTENT EVENTS Beverages FoodserWee General Merchandise 5endces Snacks & Candy Tobacco MERCHANDISING MADE EASY for s:L Torches & fuel all in one place. WHOLESALE PRICING Print, CSP Magazine July 2013 ��.ewttin Fueling Sales Inside and Out An exclusive peek at latest VideoMining heat -map study reveals challenge of pump -to -store conversion, opportunity of layout. By Samantha Otter, Senior Editor/Fuels, CSP More than 25 years ago, pay at the pump debuted in the United States, introducing great convenience to motorists and a big conundrum to retailers_ If you enable customers to pay for fuel at the pump, how do you persuade them to come inside the store to buy higher -margin items? If recent research from VideoMiningCorp_ is any indication, it's a challenge that fuel retailers have stilt not mastered. "Sixty-nine percent of gas customers are just paying for gas and leaving, regardless of whether they are paying at the pump or prepaying [inside the store],"says Priya Baboo, executive vice president of shopper insights & strategy for Video -Mining Corp., State College, Pa., which produces the annual C-Store Shopper Insights (CSI) Program, a research effort that documents the c-store shopping trip. This fourth iteration of the study, conducted in late summer 2012 and shared exclusively with CSP, included 10 chains representing 144 stores in 20 markets. Consider that for every 100 gasoline customers, 64 pay at the pump, and of the 64 pay only for gas and leave, according to Video Mining_ Let's put aside this latter group —"It is much harder to convince someone who is just thinking of pumping gas to walk into the store, because they may be in a hurry;" Baboo says —and focus solely on the opportunity presented by the others. The 36 fuel customers who walk into the store to pay are truly "low -hanging fruit, "she insists, "because in the store you have a better opportunity of converting them. But unfortunately, we're not leveraging that opportunity." How poor is that leverage? Less than a third of these customers will ultimately make an in-store purchase_ Video Mining evaluates this type of c-store shopper behavior through a combination of technologies. Ceiling - mounted cameras track customers' movements through the c-store, while proprietary video -analysis software processes millions of hours of shopping trips. This data is cross-referenced with point -of -sale data to correlate store traffic with purchasing behavior and generate insights on everything from the basics (average time spent in store, average in-store basket) to the rates at which customers shopped particular categories and made a purchase. Attr CUM Oro, Brat Today`s Tc More New Engla Petroleum Mark, Packet Pg. 173 I 3.A.d I SIGN POST AFFIDAVIT & SIGN PHOTOS El E L Q C d E t V a Q Packet Pg. 174 1 3.A.d (CHAPTER 8, COLLIER COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE FOR LAND DEVELOPMENT) A zoning sign(s) must be posted by the petitioner or the petitioner's agent on the parcel for a minimum of fifteen (15) calendar days in advance of the first public hearing and said sign(s) must be maintained by the petitioner or the petitioner's agent through the Board of County Commissioners Hearing. Below are general guidelines for signs, however these guidelines should not be construed to supersede any requirement of the LDC. For specific sign requirements, please refer to the Administrative Code, Chapter 8 E. 1. The sign(s) must be erected in full view of the public, not more than five (5) feet from the nearest street right-of-way or easement. 2. The sign(s) must be securely affixed by nails, staples, or other means to a wood frame or to a wood panel and then fastened securely to a post, or other structure. The sign may not be affixed to a tree or other foliage. 3. The petitioner or the petitioner's agent must maintain the sign(s) in place, and readable condition until the requested action has been heard and a final decision rendered. If the sign(s) is destroyed, lost, or rendered unreadable, the petitioner or the petitioner's agent must replace the sign(s NOTE: AFTER THE SIGN HAS BEEN POSTED, THIS AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE SHOULD BE RETURNED NO LATER THAN TEN (10) WORKING DAYS BEFORE THE FIRST HEARING DATE TO THE ASSIGNED PLANNER. AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER BEFORE THE UNDERSIGNED AUTHORITY, PERSONALLY APPEARED A ` y ` S c rs�T O WHO ON OATH SAYS THAT HE/SHE HAS POSTED PROPER NOTICE AS REQUIRED BY SECTION 10.03.00 OF THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE ON THE PARCEL COVERED IN PETITION NUMBER O SIGNXTTUR FPPLICAARTIOR AGENT STREET OR P.O. BOX ILL -,o S Cyr r-"D NAME (TYPED OR PRINTED) CITY, STATE ZIP STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER j The foregoing instrument was sworn to and subscribed before me this D_� day of ��VU 20) L , by tMAX6 CC%!��;3ersonally known to me or who produced as identification and who did/did not take an oath. JACQUELYN M LAROCQUE g ru'. _° ��,: State of Florida -Notary Public ' Commission # GG 162462 •a'rol t'oe� My Commission Expires November 21, 2021 My Commission Expires: (Stamp with serial number) Rev. 3/4/2015 Til Packet Pg. 175 3.A.d SIGN POST PHOTOS PL201900002183 n V El A r a Packet Pg. 176 3.A.d _T SIGN POST PHOTOS PL201900002183 . iN ti: + -*k Lie OHAM Fmoc, PARK out N�NLO- WAIVER RATIom AUTOMOBILE SERVICE STATIONS NitiGn No. ASW'Rt2019000218a HEX., Mai cb 11, 2021- 9:00 am Colviet Conti GtOwth 1Ml *ffiett r, N d 0 06 cu w W W ti N a) ILO Packet Pg. 177 I 3.A.d I HYBRID MEETING WAIVER FORM El E L Q C d E t V a Q Packet Pg. 178 1 3.A.d CoTer County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliercountvfl.gov 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Hybrid Virtual Quasi -Judicial Public Hearing Waiver Emergency/Executive Order 2020-04 Hearing of the Collier County Hearing Examiner For Petition Number(s): PL201900002183 Regarding the above subject petition number(s), David Torres, Manager (Name of Applicant) elects to proceed during the declared emergency with hybrid virtual public hearing of the Collier County Hearing Examiner, and waives the right to contest any procedural irregularity due to the hybrid virtual nature of the public hearing. Name: David Torres, Manager Date: l T Z Hammock Park Apartments, LLC .s Signature: Z✓ Applicant* ® Legal Counsel to Applicant * This form must be signed by either the Applicant (if the applicant is a corporate entity, this must be an officer of the corporate entity) or the legal counsel to the Applicant. Packet Pg. 179 3.A.e CoTer County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliercountvfl.gov 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Hybrid Virtual Quasi -Judicial Public Hearing Waiver Emergency/Executive Order 2020-04 Hearing of the Collier County Hearing Examiner For Petition Number(s): PL201900002183 Regarding the above subject petition number(s), David Torres, Manager (Name of Applicant) elects to proceed during the declared emergency with hybrid virtual public hearing of the Collier County Hearing Examiner, and waives the right to contest any procedural irregularity due to the hybrid virtual nature of the public hearing. Name: David Torres, Manager Date: l T Z Hammock Park Apartments, LLC .s Signature: Z✓ Applicant* ® Legal Counsel to Applicant * This form must be signed by either the Applicant (if the applicant is a corporate entity, this must be an officer of the corporate entity) or the legal counsel to the Applicant. Packet Pg. 180 3.A.f (CHAPTER 8, COLLIER COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE FOR LAND DEVELOPMENT) A zoning sign(s) must be posted by the petitioner or the petitioner's agent on the parcel for a minimum of fifteen (15) calendar days in advance of the first public hearing and said sign(s) must be maintained by the petitioner or the petitioner's agent through the Board of County Commissioners Hearing. Below are general guidelines for signs, however these guidelines should not be construed to supersede any requirement of the LDC. For specific sign requirements, please refer to the Administrative Code, Chapter 8 E. 1. The sign(s) must be erected in full view of the public, not more than five (5) feet from the nearest street right-of-way or easement. 2. The sign(s) must be securely affixed by nails, staples, or other means to a wood frame or to a wood panel and then fastened securely to a post, or other structure. The sign may not be affixed to a tree or other foliage. 3. The petitioner or the petitioner's agent must maintain the sign(s) in place, and readable condition until the requested action has been heard and a final decision rendered. If the sign(s) is destroyed, lost, or rendered unreadable, the petitioner or the petitioner's agent must replace the sign(s NOTE: AFTER THE SIGN HAS BEEN POSTED, THIS AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE SHOULD BE RETURNED NO LATER THAN TEN (10) WORKING DAYS BEFORE THE FIRST HEARING DATE TO THE ASSIGNED PLANNER. AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER BEFORE THE UNDERSIGNED AUTHORITY, PERSONALLY APPEARED A ` y ` S c rs�T O WHO ON OATH SAYS THAT HE/SHE HAS POSTED PROPER NOTICE AS REQUIRED BY SECTION 10.03.00 OF THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE ON THE PARCEL COVERED IN PETITION NUMBER O SIGNXTTUR FPPLICAARTIOR AGENT STREET OR P.O. BOX ILL -,o S Cyr r-"D NAME (TYPED OR PRINTED) CITY, STATE ZIP STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER j The foregoing instrument was sworn to and subscribed before me this_ day of RNOVU 20) L , by M.£0'!�,3ersonally known to me or who produced as identification and who did/did not take an oath. JACQUELYN M LAROCQUE g ru'. _° ��,: State of Florida -Notary Public ' Commission # GG 162462 •a'rol t'oe� My Commission Expires November 21, 2021 My Commission Expires: (Stamp with serial number) Rev. 3/4/2015 Packet Pg. 181 SIGN POST PHOTOS PL201900002183 n V N a) to IV N C Q1 Cn a1 C •L R d 2 L Q 0 L CL W r a Packet Pg. 182 3.A.f _T SIGN POST PHOTOS PL201900002183 -*k Lie AVER OHAMMOU F PARK OUt AUTOMOBILE SERVICE STATIONSAW�� NitiGn No. A W-R12019000218a HEX-. Mal cb 11, 2021 - m. CGIVIet Courltj GtOwth R*ffi tt 190 artt "gl%esbot or., 3� m �q 1 tti maples, T io N a) to IV Packet Pg. 183 3.B 03/11/2021 COLLIER COUNTY Collier County Hearing Examiner Item Number: 3.B Item Summary: PETITION NO. PL20200002057 VA -Request for a variance from Section 4.02.03.1) of the Land Development Code to reduce the required accessory structure side setback from 30 feet to 12.5 feet for a tennis court on Lot 5, Block G, Subdivision of Blocks E, F, G and H in Pine Ridge Subdivision, also known as 132 North Street, in Section 10, Township 49 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. [Coordinator: John Kelly, Senior Planner] Commissioner District 2 Meeting Date: 03/11/2021 Prepared by: Title: Planner — Zoning Name: John Kelly 02/19/2021 5:29 PM Submitted by: Title: Manager - Planning — Zoning Name: Ray Bellows 02/19/2021 5:29 PM Approved By: Review: Growth Management Operations & Regulatory Management Kenneth Kovensky Hearing Examiner (GMD Approvers) Diane Lynch Review Item Zoning Ray Bellows Review Item Zoning Anita Jenkins Review Item Hearing Examiner Andrew Dickman Meeting Pending Review Item Completed Completed 02/25/2021 12:05 PM Completed 02/25/2021 4:47 PM Completed 02/26/2021 9:41 AM 03/11/2021 9:00 AM Packet Pg. 184 3.B.a Com lre-r County STAFF REPORT TO: COLLIER COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER FROM: GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT ZONING DIVISION- ZONING SERVICES SECTION HEARING DATE: MARCH 11, 2021 SUBJECT: PETITION VA-PL20200002057; 132 NORTH STREET - VARIANCE PROPERTY OWNER/APPLICANT: Owner: Myles Samotin 132 North Street Naples, FL 34108 REQUESTED ACTION: Agent: Blair Foley, PE 120 Edgemere Way South Naples, FL 34105 To have the Collier County Hearing Examiner (HEX) consider an application for variance from Section 4.02.03.D of the Land Development Code (LDC) to reduce the required accessory structure side yard setback from 30 feet to 12.5 feet for to allow for a tennis court at this location. GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The subject property is located at 132 North Street and is legally recognized as Lot 5, Block G, Subdivision of Blocks E, F, G and H, Pine Ridge Subdivision, in Section 10, Township 49 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida, consisting of 1.56± acres (See location map on page 2). PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The subject improved property was purchased by the current owner on December 5, 2005. Existing improvements include a single-family residence that was constructed between 2000 and 2001 in accord with Building Permit No. 2000082038. Said owner now desires to install a tennis court on the property for which placement is constrained by limited area to the east and by a large pond that spans multiple properties to the south; the only feasible area being within the west side yard. No fencing has been proposed for the tennis court, therefore the outermost court fair -play line is the point to use for determination of setbacks. As proposed, see Attachment A, the tennis court will be setback 12.5 feet from the west side property line resulting in an encroachment of 17.5 feet into the otherwise required 30-foot side yard for listed accessory structures. VA-PL20200002057; 132 North Street Page 1 of 6 02/19/2021 Packet Pg. 185 3.B.a e ¥ @ @ � $ } � e � e e @ � @ . LL e \ @ z ( @ 9 ® � 2 - �\ . 2 § m � a \ @ . x m� rj Lu o 3� k� ¥ — 4ma I'l•IV . ■ — , J , . •per -- ■ w * \ $ � LO CD CN � � � � CN 0 N � � L: O � E _ z E � CL � � � � 0 co U 0 J vA PL 0 m0 2053 13 North Strew Page 2 R 6 OJg2z01 Packet Pg. 186 3.B.a SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING: This section of the staff report identifies the land uses and zoning classifications for properties surrounding boundaries of the subject property: North: North Street (Right -of -Way) then Single-family dwelling within an RSF-1 district South: Single-family dwelling within an RSF-1 zoning district East: Single-family dwelling within an RSF-1 zoning district West: Single-family dwelling within an RSF-1 zoning district NN .M� 1 W -S Collier County GIS VA-PL20200002057; 132 North Street Page 3 of 6 02/19/2021 Packet Pg. 187 3.B.a GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN (GMP) CONSISTENCY: The subject property is in the Urban, Mixed Use District, Urban Residential Subdistrict, on the County's Future Land Use Map (FLUM) of the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) of the GMP. The GMP does not address individual Variance requests but deals with the larger issue of the actual use. The existing single-family use is consistent with the FLUM of the GMP. The requested variance does not have any impact on this property's consistency with the County's GMP. ZONING DIVISION ANALYSIS: The decision to grant a variance is based on the criteria in LDC Section 9.04.03. Staff has analyzed this petition relative to these provisions and offers the following responses: a. Are there special conditions and circumstances existing, which are peculiar to the location, size and characteristics of the land, structure or building involved? Yes, there is a large pond to the rear of the subject property. Said pond comprises approximately one-third of the subject property and spans across several other properties. The applicant's agent states that the pond pre -dates construction of the existing residence and that the applicant has not altered the site. b. Are there special conditions and circumstances, which do not result from the action of the applicant such as pre-existing conditions relative to the property, which are the subject of the Variance request? Yes, the large pond to the rear of the residence restricts placement of the desired tennis court to the western side yard. C. Will a literal interpretation of the provisions of this zoning code work unnecessary and undue hardship on the applicant or create practical difficulties for the applicant? Yes, the applicant's agent states that a tennis court is a typical amenity within the Pine Ridge community which improves property values and is consistent with a healthy lifestyle as promoted by Collier County. A literal interpretation of the zoning code will not allow for the placement of the tennis court. Staff agrees. d. Will the Variance, if granted, be the minimum Variance that will make possible the reasonable use of the land, building or structure and which promote standards of health, safety and welfare? Yes, locating the tennis court in the west side yard minimizes the setback reduction. e. Will granting the Variance confer on the applicant any special privilege that is denied by these zoning regulations to other lands, buildings, or structures in the same zoning district? The applicant's agent states that RSF-1 lots typically have more buildable space than this VA-PL20200002057; 132 North Street Page 4 of 6 02/19/2021 Packet Pg. 188 3.B.a particular lot due to the location of the pond. Locating a feature, such as a tennis court, would be feasible on properties within the RSF-1 zoning district and is not a special privilege. Within the Pine Ridge Community tennis courts are a common improvement and many have been constructed within the 30-foot side yare setback. Therefore, granting the requested variance does not confer any special privilege on the petitioner. Staff does not disagree with the applicant; however, believes that a Variance, by definition, bestows some dimensional relief from the zoning regulations specific to a site. LDC Section 9.04.02 allows relief through a Variance process for any dimensional development standard. Other properties facing a similar hardship are entitled to make a similar request and would be conferred equal consideration on a case by case basis. E Will granting the Variance be in harmony with the general intent and purpose of this Land Development Code, and not be injurious to the neighborhood, or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare? Yes, the general purpose and intent of the LDC for residential single-family zoned districts is to promote lands for single-family housing in areas of low density. The requested Variance will be in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the Land Development Code and will not harm public safety, health and welfare. g. Are there natural conditions or physically induced conditions that ameliorate the goals and objectives of the regulation such as natural preserves, lakes, golf courses, etc.? Yes, the large pond to the rear of the property that hinders placement of the tennis court also serves as a natural buffer as does the vegetation surrounding the pond. It is believed by the applicant that disturbing the pond which spans several properties would be more obtrusive that the requested Variance. Staff agrees. h. Will granting the Variance be consistent with the Growth Management Plan? Yes, approval of this Variance will not affect or change the requirements of the GMP with respect to density, intensity, compatibility, access/connectivity, or any other applicable provisions. The petitioner has provided the County with six statements from neighboring property owners' indicating no objection to the subject variance request, including the adjoining properties to the west and south which would be the most impacted; See Attachment C. ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL (EAC) RECOMMENDATION: The EAC does not normally hear variance petitions. Since the subject variance doesn't impact any preserve area, the EAC did not hear this petition. CONCURRENT LAND USE APPLICATIONS: There are no concurrent land use applications under review at the present time. VA-PL20200002057; 132 North Street Page 5 of 6 02/19/2021 Packet Pg. 189 3.B.a RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Collier County Hearing Examiner approve Petition VA- PL20200002057, to reduce the western side yard accessory structure setback from 30 feet to 12.5 feet for a one -family tennis court to be located within said side yard subject to the following conditions: 1. Approval of this Variance will be in accordance with Attachment "A" with setbacks not to exceed those shown. 2. Any fence or wall for the subject tennis court must comply with Section 5.03.02 of the Land Development Code. 3. If the approved tennis court utilizes lighting, such lighting will be directed only onto the petitioners' property and will be shielded to prevent glare onto neighboring properties. Attachments: Attachment A: Plans Attachment B: Survey Attachment C: Applicant's Backup; Application and supporting documents VA-PL20200002057; 132 North Street Page 6 of 6 02/19/2021 Packet Pg. 190 W U 'moo aw 9 rn 112 o- raUx� W air �D pa O GJ > o" Y ¢ rry U Z c7 k.'3v rn oo omgzax ofi jQ �m0o _ ct r r a- o J 6g0.'„ W E a •nni�� LLJ J0CdP.O0 vJ O O • r--� w H �I 0 Q wa oC) o � o N m •� O ,� cam, V1 O N � �4 Q o r� U CA ct CA Con J c4� r v O ~ a � H U � o U w • ctct U 7 H �W W N UW N a w 9U IWi H 0 J W Pa. < W o CL o z o 0 0 U¢� za z 0 0 U U C7 Z c� 0 X z LLJ I w cac) p 0 �lU � o a d 0000 M m z z a�g 0 2 g o W CMO�J 109) o w a �3N772/31N3� w a y � O X OJ Lo 0 Cn W w O � h � � 2 I Y o 0 gPQ (d) ,00'0EE 3,00156>00'S -X m Uk� q� lY2 Y q b M 2 o - 2� p N� E55 0 PGG X mX - wY- X Px w� 7k °�> M � \\ X X X X yqm m - Is M 5C 5C OVd 2 �Y° " ° W � , �7J b (W) ,dE'ESf Cd) ,EE'ESE 'M.11,bbe00'N "3o00,Sbo00'S ti R U 4O p U � W �r Q C oa E- 0 Wa O q a p� y rc � O 2W E- y � O =W Yo� F. m tia ry ¢ 2 g$4 I@"e ?=kaSkc a�YY2�g�gpkkyk`#3�YYSY`��§r`gI�b��{ �k1,38 k'54-4-�" a E &ak2 E'28effe'a'a�Yaa'.acB°GaS°Xa$k6nwwwre��#'<B�mds��*C��k� Q a' a] �k Fa U ee d � 3 � 0 9$ a"I M d S€gy 3 z afi pp& y wYy N 4 '� 4ec `k Yo Asa g41wlie .7 p o E � 0 :fia.Y.",�R'X.1Afi 9a3eanYn7:Ra�.,`.. k,^,@.BafiG:ffi#YmBfi RpQ &fi do"Y^:fifi S � �i Eq<q� yy Y gZL YWi 'i�fE� "� gSRkp�B�Yg �aap'pa�z� yyp6�a€aaaaggqA�Oy��°y�°y�$�$°$y$r$ ^Yi4EE� IT m33CSaC��o'd Z ti Z z_ m � � � � M U d � Q tiN oo z w Jq w 3 W p o V z W a <v M N w x 6g 8 a X c, S d afi �O 1 Y sF �G8 O UNg � adR a'gg" egk� k.i mm„ �i 2 U=WW �k 'I $io Iwo as a W � z Ud-.qYq .�gF V230 O �'S m` 2'g ¢ a O W dd£ 5E 3.B.d Coibe' r County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 VARIANCE PETITION APPLICATION Variance from Setbacks Required for a Particular Zoning District LDC section 9.04.00 & Code of Laws section 2-83 — 2-90 Chapter 3 J. of the Administrative Code PROJECT NUMBER To be completed by staff PROJECT NAME DATE PROCESSED APPLICANT CONTACT INFORMATION Name of Property Owner(s): Myles Samotin Name of Applicant if different than owner: Address: 132 North St. city: Naples State: FL zip: 34108 Telephone: Cell: Fax: E-Mail Address: Name of Agent: Blair Foley. PE Firm: Address:120 Edgemere Way S city: Naples State: FL zip:34105 Telephone: 239,263,1222 Cell: 239.289.4900 Fax: E-Mail Address: fo1s000(@_ao1.com BE AWARE THAT COLLIER COUNTY HAS LOBBYIST REGULATIONS. GUIDE YOURSELF ACCORDINGLY AND ENSURE THAT YOU ARE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THESE REGULATIONS. 4/27/2018 Pa Packet Pg. 195 3.B.d Coder County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.collier,eov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 PROPERTY INFORMATION Provide a detailed legal description of the property covered by the application: (If space is inadequate, attach on separate page) Property I.D. Number: 67231360002 Subdivision: Pine Ridge Metes & Bounds Description: See Survey Address/ General Location of Subject Property: Section/Township/Range: 10 /49 /25 Unit: Lot: 5 Block: G Total Acreage: 1.56 132 North St., Naples, FL 34108 ADJACENT ZONING AND LAND USE Zoning Land Use N North St ROW S RSF-1 Occupied E RSF-1 Occupied W RSF-1 Occupied Minimum Yard Requirements for Subject Property: Front: 50 Corner Lot: Yes ❑ No ❑■ Side: 30 Waterfront Lot: Rear: 50 Yes ❑ No ❑■ Chapter 8 of the Administrative Code requires that the applicant must remove their public hearing advertising sign(s) after final action is taken by the Board of County Commissioners. Based on the Board's final action on this item, please remove all public hearing advertising sign(s) immediately. 4/27/2018 Pa Packet Pg. 196 3.B.d Gorier County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net ASSOCIATIONS 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Complete the following for all registered Association(s) that could be affected by this petition. Provide additional sheets if necessary. Information can be found on the Board of County Commissioner's website at http://www.colliergov.net/Index.aspx?page=774. Name of Homeowner Association: Pine Ridge Civic Of Naples Homeowners Association Mailing Address: PO Box 111208 City: Naples State: FL Name of Homeowner Association: Mailing Address: Name of Homeowner Association: Mailing Address: Name of Homeowner Association: Mailing Address: Name of Homeowner Association: Mailing Address: ZIP: 34108 City: State: ZIP: City: State: ZIP: City: State: ZIP: City: State: ZIP: NATURE OF PETITION On a separate sheet, attached to the application, please provide the following: 1. A detailed explanation of the request including what structures are existing and what is proposed; the amount of encroachment proposed using numbers, i.e. reduce front setback from 25 ft. to 18 ft.; when property owner purchased property; when existing principal structure was built (include building permit number(s) if possible); why encroachment is necessary; how existing encroachment came to be; etc. 2. For projects authorized under LDC Section 9.04.02, provide a detailed description of site alterations, including any dredging and filling. 3. Pursuant to LDC section 9.04.00, staff shall be guided in their recommendation to the Hearing Examiner, and the Hearing Examiner shall be guided in the determination to approve or deny a variance petition by the criteria (a-h) listed below. Please address the following criteria: a) Are there special conditions and circumstances existing which are peculiar to the location, size and characteristics of the land, structure, or building involved. 4/27/2018 Pa Packet Pg. 197 3.B.d Gorier County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 b) Are there special conditions and circumstances which do not result from the action of the applicant such as pre-existing conditions relative to the property which is the subject of the variance request. c) Will a literal interpretation of the provisions of this zoning code work unnecessary and undue hardship on the applicant or create practical difficulties on the applicant. d) Will the variance, if granted, be the minimum variance that will make possible the reasonable use of the land, building or structure and which promote standards of health, safety or welfare. e) Will granting the variance requested confer on the petitioner any special privilege that is denied by these zoning regulations to other lands, buildings, or structures in the same zoning district. f) Will granting the variance be in harmony with the intent and purpose of this zoning code, and not be injurious to the neighborhood, or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare. g) Are there natural conditions or physically induced conditions that ameliorate the goals and objectives of the regulation such as natural preserves, lakes, golf course, etc. h) Will granting the variance be consistent with the Growth Management Plan? 4. Official Interpretations or Zoning Verifications: To your knowledge, has there been an official interpretation or zoning verification rendered on this property within the last year? ❑ Yes N No If yes, please provide copies. 4/27/2018 Pa Packet Pg. 198 3.B.d Gorier County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Pre -Application Meeting and Final Submittal Requirement Checklist for: Variance Chapter 3 J. of the Administrative Code The following Submittal Requirement Checklist is to be utilized during the Pre -Application Meeting and at time of application submittal. At time of submittal, the checklist is to be completed and submitted with the application packet. Please provide the submittal items in the exact order listed below with cover sheets attached to each section. Incomplete submittals will not be accepted. REQUIREMENTS FOR REVIEW # OF COPIES REQUIRED NOT REQUIRED Completed Application (download current form from County website) ❑Li Pre -Application Meeting Notes 1 ❑ Project Narrative ❑ ❑ Completed Addressing Checklist 1 Property Ownership Disclosure Form 1 Conceptual Site Plan 24" x 36" and one 8 %" x 11" copy ❑El Survey of property showing the encroachment (measured in feet) 2 Affidavit of Authorization, signed and notarized 2 ❑ ❑ Deeds/Legal's 3 ❑ Location map 1 Li ❑ Current aerial photographs (available from Property Appraiser) with project boundary and, if vegetated, FLUCFCS Codes with legend included on aerial 5 ❑ ❑ Historical Survey or waiver request 1 ❑Li Environmental Data Requirements or exemption justification 3 ❑ ❑ Once the first set of review comments are posted, provide the assigned planner the Property Owner Advisory Letter and Certification 1 ❑ ❑ Electronic copy of all documents and plans *Please advise: The Office of the Hearing Examiner requires all materials to be submitted electronically in PDF format. 1 ❑ ❑ ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PUBLIC HEARING PROCESS: • Following the completion of the review process by County review staff, the applicant shall submit all materials electronically to the designated project manager. • Please contact the project manager to confirm the number of additional copies required. 4/27/2018 Pa Packet Pg. 199 3.B.d COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT Co ler County 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Planners: Indicate if the petition needs to be routed to the following reviewers: ❑ Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment: Executive Director ❑ Historical Review City of Naples: Robin Singer, Planning Director ❑ Immokalee Water/Sewer District Conservancy of SWFL: Nichole Ryan ❑ Parks and Recreation: David Berra ❑Emergency Management: Dan Summers; and/or EMS: Artie Bay ❑ School District (Residential Components): Amy Lockheart Other: ❑ FEE REQUIREMENTS ❑ Pre -Application Meeting: $500.00 ❑ Variance Petition: o Residential- $2,000.00 o Non -Residential- $5,000.00 0 51h and Subsequent Review- 20% of original fee - Estimated Legal Advertising Fee for the Office of the Hearing Examiner: $1,125.00 ❑ After The Fact Zoning/Land Use Petitions: 2x the normal petition fee Listed Species Survey (if EIS is not required): $1,000.00 Fire Code Plans Review Fees are collected at the time of application submission and those fees are set forth by the Authority having jurisdiction. The Land Development Code requires Neighborhood Notification mailers for Applications headed to hearing, and this fee is collected prior to hearing. As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is included in this submittal package. I understand that failure to include all necessary submittal information may result in the delay of processing this petition. All checks payable to: Board of County Commissioners. The completed application, all required submittal materials, and the permit fee shall be submitted to: Growth Management Department Zoning Division Digitally signed by Blair A Blair A Foley Foley Date: 2020.10.22 09:09:36 -04'00' Applicant Signature Blair Foley Printed Name ATTN: Business Center 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Date 4/27/2018 Pa Packet Pg. 200 3.B.d Variance Request for Tennis Court Side Yard Setback OWNER/APPLICANT: Myles Samotin FOLIO: 67231360002 ADDRESS: 132 North St. Naples, FL 34108 Request: The applicant is requesting a variance for relief from LDC 4.02.1 Table 2.1 to reduce the side yard setback from 30' to 12.5'. Variance Criteria: 1. A detailed explanation of the request including what structures are existing and what is proposed; the amount of encroachment proposed using numbers, i.e. reduce front setback from 25 ft. to 18 ft.; when property owner purchased property; when existing principal structure was built (include building permit number(s) if possible); why encroachment is necessary; how existing encroachment came to be; etc. The property is a one-story, single-family residence that has a single-entry driveway on —1.56 acres. The existing home was constructed in 2000-2001 under building permit number 200008-2038. The CO was obtained 11/27/01. The applicant purchased the property on 12/22/2005 (deed is book -page, 3952-2568). The applicant proposes to install a tennis court on the west side of the existing home. The existing setback on the west side is approximately 60' (30' required by RSF-1 zoning.) The applicant requests variance in the west side yard setback from 30' to 12.5' to install the tennis court. Due to the conditions on the lot, the west side yard is the only feasible location to install the tennis court. The restricting conditions include a pond in the rear yard that spans multiple properties and even smaller dimensions on the east side yard that is also the location of the driveway and garage entry. 2. For projects authorized under LDC Section 9.04.02, provide a detailed description of site alterations, including any dredging and filling. The applicant has not altered the site. The same conditions exist from the date of purchase. The large pond in the rear of the property was constructed prior to the construction of the existing home. The pond overlaps the south and east property lines, so altering it to accommodate the tennis court in the rear yard would significantly affect those neighbors' properties. 3. Pursuant to LDC section 9.04.00, staff shall be guided in their recommendation to the Hearing Examiner, and the Hearing Examiner shall be guided in the determination to approve or deny a variance petition by the criteria (a-h) listed below. Please address the following criteria: a) Are there special conditions and circumstances existing which are peculiar to the location, size Packet Pg. 201 3.B.d and characteristics of the land, structure, or building involved. There is a large pond in the rear yard that covers approximately one third of the lot making it impossible to locate the tennis court in the rear yard. b) Are there special conditions and circumstances which do not result from the action of the applicant such as pre-existing conditions relative to the property which is the subject of the variance request. There is a large pond in the rear yard that covers approximately one third of the lot making it impossible to locate the tennis court in the rear yard. c) Will a literal interpretation of the provisions of this zoning code work unnecessary and undue hardship on the applicant or create practical difficulties on the applicant. Literal interpretation of the zoning code will not allow the applicant to construct the tennis court improvement. d) Will the variance, if granted, be the minimum variance that will make possible the reasonable use of the land, building or structure and which promote standards of health, safety or welfare. The proposed location of the tennis court on the west side yard minimizes the setback reduction e) Will granting the variance requested confer on the petitioner any special privilege that is denied by these zoning regulations to other lands, buildings, or structures in the same zoning district. Typically, RSF-1 lots have more buildable space than this particular lot due to the location of the pond Locating a feature, such as a tennis court, would be feasible on properties within the RSF-1 zoning district and is not a special privilege. In Pine Ridge, tennis courts are a common property improvement. A short aerial search shows that many of the tennis courts have been constructed in the 30' side yard setback. Therefore, granting the variance does not confer any special privilege on the petitioner. f) Will granting the variance be in harmony with the intent and purpose of this zoning code, and not be injurious to the neighborhood, or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare. A tennis court is a typical feature in the Pine Ridge neighborhood which improves the property value and is consistent with healthy lifestyle promoted by Collier County. g) Are there natural conditions or physically induced conditions that ameliorate the goals and objectives of the regulation such as natural preserves, lakes, golf course, etc. There is a large pond in the rear yard that covers approximately one third of the lot making it impossible to locate the tennis court in the rear yard. The pond was constructed prior to the construction of the existing home. The pond overlaps the south and east property lines, so altering it to accommodate the tennis court in the rear yard would significantly affect those neighbors' properties. Packet Pg. 202 3.B.d h) Will granting the variance be consistent with the Growth Management Plan? Granting the variance will not alter the density, nature, or single-family residential character of the property so it will continue to be consistent with the Growth Management Plan. Packet Pg. 203 Collier County Property Appraiser Property Summary Site 132 Site Zone Parcel No 67231360002 Address N TH ST Site City I NAPLES *Note 3411 *Disclaimer Name / Address SAMOTIN, MYLES R 132 N TH ST Citv I NAPLES I State I FL I Zia 134108-2922 Map No. Strap No. Section Township Range Acres *Estimated 4A10 561100 G 54A10 10 49 25 1.56 Legal PINE RIDGE BLKS E F G H BLK G LOT 5 Milla a Areas 118 Milla a Rates O *Calculations Sub./Condo 561100 - PINE RIDGE BLKS EFGH School Other Total Use Code v 1 - SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL 5.016 5.7924 10.8084 Latest Sales History (Not all Sales are listed due to Confidentialitv) Date Book -Page Amount 12/22/05 3952-2568 $ 2,895,000 09/18/98 2462-2411 $ 361,000 12/01/91 1 1667-2216 1 $ 230,000 11/01/81 945-605 $ 0 01/01/75 611-391 $ 0 2020 Certified Tax Roll (Subiact M Channel Land Value $ 833,8! (+) Improved Value $ 1,230,01 (_) Market Value $ 2,063,9; (-) Save our Home $ 877,8; (_) Assessed Value $ 1,186,1' (-) Homestead $ 25,01 (_) (-) (_) School Taxable Value Additional Homestead Taxable Value $ 1,161,1' $ 25,01 $ 1,136,1' If all Values shown above equal 0 this parcel was created after the Final Tax Roll Packet Pg. 204 C01(I1ev County 3.B.d COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 PROPERTY OWNERSHIP DISCLOSURE FORM This is a required form with all land use petitions, except for Appeals and Zoning Verification Letters. Should any changes of ownership or changes in contracts for purchase occur subsequent to the date of application, but prior to the date of the final public hearing, it is the responsibility of the applicant, or agent on his behalf, to submit a supplemental disclosure of interest form. Please complete the following, use additional sheets if necessary. a. If the property is owned fee simple by an INDIVIDUAL, tenancy by the entirety, tenancy in common, or joint tenancy, list all parties with an ownership interest as well as the percentage of such interest: 701 C. Name and Address % of Ownership MYLES R SAMOTIN 100 If the property is owned by a CORPORATION, list the officers and stockholders and the percentage of stock owned by each: Name and Address % of Ownership N/A If the property is in the name of a TRUSTEE, list the beneficiaries of the trust with the percentage of interest: Name and Address N/A Created 9/28/2017 % of Ownershi Page 1 of 3 Packet Pg. 205 Co��er Cou�.ty 3.B.d COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net CJ e f 129 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 If the property is in the name of a GENERAL or LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, list the name of the C erleidl drlU/Ul !IIIIlUfU pdrLlI"-1 Name and Address % of Ownership N/A If there is a CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE, with an individual or individuals, a Corporation, Trustee, or a Partnership, list the names of the contract purchasers below, including the M• �Mcers, stocKnoiaers, Deneuciaries, or partners. Name and Address % of Ownership N/A Date of Contract: If any contingency clause or contract terms involve additional parties, list all individuals or of ricers, [r a corpora-Eion, par][nersrnp, Ur Lr usL. Name and Address N/A Date subject property acquired 12/22/05 ❑ Leased: Term of lease years /months If, Petitioner has option to buy, indicate the following: Created 9/28/2017 Page 2 of 3 Packet Pg. 206 Codier County 3.B.d COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.coilierppv.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Date of option* Date option terminates: _ . or Anticipated closing date: AFFIRM PROPERTY 0VVi4ZRSH1P IMFORMI AT101V Any petition required to have Property Ownership Disclosure, will not be accepted without this form. Requirements for petition types are located on the associated application form. Any change in ownership whether individually or with a Trustee, Company or other interest -holding party, must be disclosed to Collier County immediately if such change occurs prior to the petition's final public hearing. As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is included in this submittal package. i understand that failure to include all necessary submittal information may result in the delay of processing this petition. n The completed application, all tequired s mittal materials, and fees shall be submitted to: rowth Management Department ATTN: Business Center 2800 North Horseshoe Drive r if Naples, FL 34104 ;r Agent/OWner Signature k\ f� ( l V Agent/O ner Name (please print) Created 9/28/2017 > r Date � Packet Pg. 207 3.B.d AFFIDAVIT OF AUTHORIZATION FOR PETITION NUMBERS(S) 132 North Street. Tennis Court Setback Vertance. Pabto� Number to be Prwided by County I, D2 IM �Iam �" ~� rint name , as mP o �t1 f2 O2� j} ) (title, if applicable) of Cn (company, If a licable), swear or affirm under oath, ththe (choose one) owner ✓ plicantQcontract purchaser and that: 1. 1 have full authority to secure the approval(s) requested and to impose covenants and restrictions on the referenced property as a result of any action approved by the County in accordance with this application and the Land Development Code; 2. All answers to the questions in this application and any sketches, data or other supplementary matter attached hereto and made a part of this application are honest and true; 3. 1 have authorized the staff of Collier County to enter upon the property during normal working hours for the purpose of investigating and evaluating the request made through this application; and that 4. The property will be transferred, conveyed, sold or subdivided subject to the conditions and restrictions imposed by the approved action. 5. Well authorize BtatrkFoley, PE to act as our/my representative in any matters regarding this petition including 1 through 2 above. 'Notes: • If the applicant is a corporation, then it is usually executed by the Corp. pros, or V. pres. • If the applicant is a Limited Liability Company (L.L.C.) or Limited Company (L.C.), then the documents should typically be signed by the Company's "Managing Member. • If the applicant is a partnership, then typically a partner can sign on behalf of the partnership_ • If the applicant is a limited partnership, then the general partner must sign and be identified as the "general partner' of the named partnership. • If the applicant is a trust, then t ey ust include the trustee's name and the words "as trustee" • In each instance, first dete e t a plicant's status, e.g., individual, corporate, trust, partnership, and then use the appropriate format f hat wrc ship. Under penalties of pre jury, eclla Jha� have read the foregoing Affidavit of Authorization and that the fact stated in it tru . • STATE OF FLORI COUNTY OF COL ER The Joregoing instrument was acknowleged before me by means of Elphysical present or ❑online notarization this day of 201,, by (printed name of owner or qualifier) no"( 6 it'4 5 h person(s) Notary Public must check applicable box: Are personally known to me ❑ Has produced a current drivers license ❑ Has produced as identification. �►?� •! MARIEA. SCWUBLE Notary Signature: A. 1. *• MYCOMMISSION axGG970734 o'=,^ EXPIRES: July 18.,�2�02�4 y_� ,lfOF nOP. Bonded � Notary puboc Lind w am 0108-COA-00115\155 REV 314/2020 Packet Pg. 208 U ct ct V/ ci 1� ct ct m N M x N W � N U Z x w w�0 a y a oQU o x �Qzao � zw x°"�Waa Q d g0"'wE OE- E- r., a �N� 9 pye- °ivoo ' aZM N ¢ goo = ofiQ m 0 o _ �U�� C9 a� I �M a 0 as L.L U z W W a w Q o in W 0 0 O O U U 0 0 z z o o a a m m z m z 3.B.d Blair A. Foley, P.E. Civil Engineer / Development Consultant January 21, 2021 Name: Terence Hayes Address: 150 North St. City, State Zip: Naples, FL 34108 Dear Property Owner: Please be advised that the sender has made a formal application to Collier County for a variance from the requirements of the zoning regulations as they apply to the following described property: 132 North Street, Naples, Florida — Pine Ridge Estates It is our intent to request Collier County for a proposed 17.5-foot variance from the required western side yard accessory setback of 30 feet as provided for in Land Development Code Section 4.02.03.1) for the Residential Single-Family-1 Zoning District. The request is to allow an unenclosed tennis court at 12.5 feet from the west property line located at 132 North Street in Section 10, Township 49 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. [PL20200002057] In order to provide you an opportunity to become fully aware of our intention, we are contacting you directly via this letter, or you may choose to telephone the sender for further information. In any event, please be advised that we are interested in assuring you that our request should not adversely affect your property interest. Sincerely, Blair A. Foley, PE President Blair A. Foley, PE, LLC 120 Edgemere Way S. Naples, FL 34105 Tele: 239.263.1222 Packet Pg. 212 m a; 43aoN ZED VA LSOZOOOOZOZ-ld : BL 4S6) 6Z'ZZ'Z IS 4:PoN ZE4 O6e)IOed 6uiaeOH - O IUB 43ellV :IUOWL]OelIv w a F Ln LU cr a a O O M U M CO N N 0 0 0 O 0 0 000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 OOQOOOOOOCD M N O w 0 O O Nto O Y ti 0 00 O_ It n _O M LL M M M M M M M M M N N N N N N N N N cD cD LD LD c0 (0 (0 c0 c0 N M N N CN (14 W � 0) ON) N O O N O N O O N wwcowwmomw MMAMA)cAAA) J J J J J J J J J LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL fn U Ln [n (6 U U U U W Ll1LLJwwwwww J J J J J J J J J as(Laa.CLCL Za QQaa¢¢¢¢Q zzzzzzzzz N Ll) O W CD W Z M � T Lu c'J CC Z C � Q ~ � U U e� U N m O w w w w J Er 4) Z FL in U NLn r tD N r r N O N } F � LU V- W w z w X w Z w U) ; F— F Y J J F m U = IL (n (n U) w (7 U) aT-w M 1:LLF= _ZI—FwF-FFLLwF c LLI 0 LU 0 0 0 0<-5 0 Ln z(.)IXzzz¢Qz r � (M X L- L(') 0 C-4 (14 0— M LO ¢ Yce) r r J r r JJ 3 F m U D F W ►- O � U N oCD W O U J F U aw��¢�wa}� o z�J=z�wgaw N co -� oa LL- z O= J -� JO< WwM a Z]C} ��¢Ow>: c Q n w F O O z zwoLia(6wZF- .r 0zwoO5-zmg d ¢ULWiLLLLC72Yww V0918/09 LS®Nany y�lm algl�adwoo «8/S Z X ,G azls legal .. ALISON P KALB REVOCABLE TRUST CENTERLAND LLC FRIEDMAN, ARTHU 114 NORTH STREET 123 CENTER STREET LORRAINE PAIGE NAPLES, FL 34108 --- 2922 NAPLES, FL 34108 --- 0 175 CENTER ST NAPLES, FL 34108 --- 0 FULOP, JACK & NATALIA C GEORGELOS FAMILY TRUST HAYES, TERENCE M 117 NORTH ST 135 NORTH ST 150 NORTH ST c NAPLES, FL 34108---2923 NAPLES, FL 34108 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34108--- 2922 0 E M r m a> KENNEDY, THOMAS C ROBINSON, KHARY SAMOTIN, MYLES R N LAINA RIFFS-KENNEDY KIRANJEET GILL 132 NORTH ST t 16627 FIRENZE WAY 2941 AZURE BAY CT NAPLES, FL 34108--- 2922 NAPLES, FL 34110 --- 0 NAPLES, FL 34119 --- 0 Z N M r Q - _ > L0 O - N O O O O N O N a 00 r r r - N N N N fn t O Z N M N CM M Y V a a� N 2 r _ d 1= L t) r Q _ d 1= t C:1 i Q label size 1" x 2 5/8" compatible with Avery @5160/8160 Packet Pg. 214 STARR n I`tinafta rin fnrmat 99 mm Y F,7 mm rmmnnfihla near wanr CR ;1 Anini rn „ A A 3.B.d AFFIDAVIT OF COMPLIANCE I hereby certify that pursuant to Ordinance 2004-72, of the Collier County Land Development Code, 1 did give notice by mail at least 30 days after receipt of letter indicating that the application is sufficient to the following property owners and or condominium and civic associations whose members may be impacted by the proposed land use changes of an application request for a variance or parking exemption. For the purposes of this requirement, the names and addresses of property owners shall be deemed those appearing on the latest tax rolls of Collier County and any other persons or entities who have made a formal request of the county to be notified. The said notice contained the laymen's description of the site property of proposed change. Per attached letters and or property owner's list, which are hereby made a part of this Affidavit of Compliance. 9 , ' 7-��A(0- (Signature of Apoicant) State of Florida County of Collier The foregoing Affidavit of compliance was acknowledged before me this Zl day of zby_ , who i �erson known to me o who has produced as identification. (Signature of Notary Public) A mapi c�a ac- Printed Name of Notary (Notary Seal) a,►� * Pu, Notary Public State of Florida _ Amanda McLean My Commission GG 157507 y ar r a Expires 11105/2021 Packet Pg. 215 3.B.d Justification for Variance Request for Tennis Court Side Yard Setback OWNER/APPLICANT: Myles Samotin FOLIO: 67231360002 ADDRESS: 132 North St. Naples, FL 34108 3. Pursuant to LDC section 9.04.00, staff shall be guided in their recommendation to the Hearing Examiner, and the Hearing Examiner shall be guided in the determination to approve or deny a variance petition by the criteria (a-h) listed below. Please address the following criteria: a) Are there special conditions and circumstances existing which are peculiar to the location, size and characteristics of the land, structure, or building involved. There is a large pond in the rear yard that covers approximately one third of the lot making it impossible to locate the tennis court in the rear yard. b) Are there special conditions and circumstances which do not result from the action of the applicant such as pre-existing conditions relative to the property which is the subject of the variance request. There is a large pond in the rear yard that covers approximately one third of the lot making it impossible to locate the tennis court in the rear yard. c) Will a literal interpretation of the provisions of this zoning code work unnecessary and undue hardship on the applicant or create practical difficulties on the applicant. Literal interpretation of the zoning code will not allow the applicant to construct the tennis court improvement. d) Will the variance, if granted, be the minimum variance that will make possible the reasonable use of the land, building or structure and which promote standards of health, safety or welfare. The proposed location of the tennis court on the west side yard minimizes the setback reduction. e) Will granting the variance requested confer on the petitioner any special privilege that is denied by these zoning regulations to other lands, buildings, or structures in the same zoning district. Typically, RSF-1 lots have more buildable space than this particular lot due to the location of the pond Locating a feature, such as a tennis court, would be feasible on properties within the RSF-1 zoning district and is not a special privilege. In Pine Ridge, tennis courts are a common property improvement. A short aerial search shows that many of the tennis courts have been constructed in the 30' side yard setback. Therefore, granting the variance does not confer any special privilege on the petitioner. f) Will granting the variance be in harmony with the intent and purpose of this zoning code, and not be injurious to the neighborhood, or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare. Packet Pg. 216 3.B.d A tennis court is a typical feature in the Pine Ridge neighborhood which improves the property value and is consistent with healthy lifestyle promoted by Collier County. g) Are there natural conditions or physically induced conditions that ameliorate the goals and objectives of the regulation such as natural preserves, lakes, golf course, etc. There is a large pond in the rear yard that covers approximately one third of the lot making it impossible to locate the tennis court in the rear yard. The pond was constructed prior to the construction of the existing home. The pond overlaps the south and east property lines, so altering it to accommodate the tennis court in the rear yard would significantly affect those neighbors' properties. h) Will granting the variance be consistent with the Growth Management Plan? Granting the variance will not alter the density, nature, or single-family residential character of the property so it will continue to be consistent with the Growth Management Plan. Packet Pg. 217 a�g 0 2 g o W CMO�J 109) o w a �3N772/31N3� w a y � O X OJ Lo 0 Cn W w O � h � � 2 I Y o 0 gPQ (d) ,00'0EE 3,00156>00'S -X m Uk� q� lY2 Y q b M 2 o - 2� p N� E55 0 PGG X mX - wY- X Px w� 7k °�> M � \\ X X X X yqm m - Is M 5C 5C OVd 2 �Y° " ° W � , �7J b (W) ,dE'ESf Cd) ,EE'ESE 'M.11,bbe00'N "3o00,Sbo00'S ti R U 4O p U � W �r Q C oa E- 0 Wa O q a p� y rc � O 2W E- y � O =W Yo� F. m tia ry ¢ 2 g$4 .: @"e ?=kaSkc a�YY2�g�gpkkyk`#3�YYSY`��§r`gI�b��{ �k1,38 `� k'54-4-�" a 6 w E &ak2 E'28effe'a'a�Yaa'.acB°GaS°Xa$k6nwwwre��#'<B�mds��*C��k� Q a' a] �k Fa U ee d � 3 � 0 9$ a"I M d S€gy a z afi pp& y wYy N 4 '� 4ec `k Yo Asa g41wlaa ^'<Y3g; gk �YBkk�k€�E ��^� .7 p o E � ��Ggggggb�� 0 :fia.Y.",�R'X.1Afi 9a3eanYn7:Ra�.,`.. k,^,@.BafiG:ffi#YmBfi RpQ &fi do"Y^:fifi S � �i Eq<q� yy Y gZL YWi 'i�fE� "� sask�9��gag �aap'pa�z� yyp6�a€aaaaggqA�Oy��°y�°y�$�$°$y$r$ ^Yi4EE� IT m33CSaC��o'd Z ti Z z_ m � � � � M U d � Q tiN oo z w Jq w 3 W p o V z W <v a M N w x 6g 8 a X c, S d afi �O 1 Y sF �G8 O UNg � adR k.i mm„ �i 2 U=WW �k 'I $io Iwo as a W � z Ud-.qYq .�gF V230 O �'S m` 2'g ¢ a O W dd£ 5E NEIGHBORS FOR REQUEST OF YARD REDUCTION 3.B.d 10 be completed by the Petitioner V WIICI In, �S �An1�r-ri f-11i Project Address: I ?, I1.)02rI� ST2F,2� Scope of Work: �( /1 1(o l�0 S l _Q1ig_i�-4 t o Plan Check Number: r3ae(ti I �_u 3ylpj� Date: ' p REQUEST: To allow a reducedt3side)0(rear)[](front) yard of W f t in lieu of &D feet as required by Code and as indicated in the attached Plans. I certify that the plans presented to the neighbor for his/her rev ie re id�j(� cal to I ose plans for which a building permit is being requested: /)A ./ Signature To be completed by Neighbor (Name) e) am the legal owner of property (Na located at J�) A i C-S 1� L "3 LJ i o (address - number and street) with the following legal description: Lot:_ Block: f-r-- Tract: which is an adjoining property (including across the street) to the project address. I am aware that a reduction of required yards is being applied for at the subject property and have reviewed the plans presented to me by the petitioner for the proposed construction. I HAVE NO OBzy"o JECTION TO GRANTING MY CONSENT FOR THE AFOREMENTIONED REQUEST FOR YARD REDUCTION. ❑ I OBJECT TO THIS REQUEST FOR A YARD REDUCTION. (NOTE THAT NEIGHBORS ARE UNDE NO OBLIGATION TO SIGN) i Neig or Sig at r Date r V� Print Name PC-STR.Form10 (Rev 11-13-2009) VA%w.lacity org Packet Pg. 219 3.B.d LETTER OF CONSENT/NON-CONSENT FROM ADJOINING NEIGHBORS FOR REQUEST OF YARD REDUCTION To be completed by the Petitioner Owner. Project Address: 162, Koarif &T(z&,t �Aeekt 341OZ Scope of Work: _ IJ Plan Check Number. Date: in lieu of SO feet as REQUEST: To allow a reducedt(s1de)[3(rear)[(front) yard ofJidcal required by Code and as indicated in the attached plans. I certify that the plans presented to the neighbor for his/her revie to Vsplans-fq which a building permit is being requested: Signature To be completed by Neighbor I, Lct t zf4 5` am the legal owner of property (Na111e) 1 located at 5 e n 4-C, /V r� Ll / ( a (address - number and street) with the following legal description: Lot: 1Block: 6, Tract: which is an adjoining property (including across the street) to the project address. I am aware that a reduction of required yards is being applied for at the subject property and have reviewed the plans presented to me by the petitioner for the proposed construction. ❑� 1 HAVE NO OBJECTION TO GRANTING MY CONSENT FOR THE AFOREMENTIONED REQUEST FOR YARD REDUCTION. ❑ I OBJECT TO THIS REQUEST FOR A YARD REDUCTION. (NOTE THAT NEIGHBORS ARE UNDER NO OBLIGATION TO SIGN) < 0 / t <-t 12-0 Lo Date l PC-STR Farm10 (Rev 11-13-2009) Packet Pg. 220 3.B.d LETTER OF CONSENT/NON-CONSENT FROM ADJOINING NEIGHBORS FOR REQUEST OF YARD REDUCTION To be completed by the Petitioner Owner. i7 �� . , y rZ . r r1 OWKO" N Project Address: 162, IrO WW# S-t�T O W (6 R 34I R Scope of Work: , ' Id Plan Check Number: Date; REQUEST: To allow a reducedaside)0(rear)[](front) yard of LO f t in lieu of SO feet as required by Code and as indicated in the attached Plans. I certify that the plans presented to the neighbor for his/her revle re Id cal to se iar SS, which a building permit is being requested: / A v Signature M To be completed by Neiahbor 0.'iS _ , am the iegai owner of property (Name) located at �_�� (address - number and street) with the following legal description: Lot. I (o Block: Tract: which is an adjoining property (including across the street) to the project address. I am aware that a reduction of required yards is being applied for at the subject property and have reviewed the plans presented to me by the petitioner for the proposed construction, ! HAVE NO OBJECTION TO GRANTING MY CONSENT FOR THE AFOREMENTIONED REQUEST FOR YARD REDUCTION. ❑ 1 OBJECT TO THIS REQUEST FOR A YARD REDUCTION. (NOTE THAT NEIGHBORS ARE UNDER NO OBLIGATION TO SIGN) Neighbo4ftneture Date 0o-Imo.[ plat Namw PC-STR.Fvnn10 (Rev 11-13.2009) www�r't ,- Packet Pg. 221 3.B.d LETTER OF CONSENT/NON-CONSENT FROM ADJOINING NEIGHBORS FOR REQUEST OF YARD REDUCTION To be completed by the Petitioner Owner: Project Address: Scope of Work: Plan Check Number: ZOW REQUEST: To allow a reducedUside)❑(rear)❑(front) yard of LOIcal in lieu of SO feet as required by Code and as indicated in the attached plans i I certify that the plans presented to the neighbor for his/her revie re idto building i se plans for which a permit is being requested: ! Signature To be completed by Neicahbor U"k (3, ry LG t-1 o S , am the legal owner of property (Name) located at 135 _ FL 3 U (address - nu ber and str et with the following legal description: Lot: r _ Block: r Tract: which is an adjoining property (including across the street) to the project address. I am aware that a reduction of required yards is being applied for at the subject property and have reviewed the plans presented to me by the petitioner for the proposed construction. bQ HAVE NO OBJECTION TO GRANTING MY CONSENT FOR THE AFOREMENTIONED REQUEST FOR YARD REDUCTION. ❑ I OBJECT TO THIS REQUEST FOR A YARD REDUCTION. (NOTE THAT NEIGHBORS ARE UNDER NO OBLIGATION TO SIGN) Signature Print Name Date PC-STR.Form10 (Rev 11-13-2009) Packet Pg. 222 3.B.d LETTER OF CONSENT/NON-CONSENT FROM ADJOINING NEIGHBORS FOR REQUEST OF YARD REDUCTION To be completed by Neiathbor I,CLG �w � am the legal owner of property located at rKL (address - number and street) _ with the following legal description: Lot:_q Block: f' Tract: which is an adjoining property (including across the street) to the project address. I am aware that a reduction of required yards is being applied for at the subject property and have reviewed the plans presented to me by the petitioner for the proposed construction. I HAVE NO OBJECTION TO GRANTING MY CONSENT FOR THE AFOREMENTIONED REQUEST FOR YARD REDUCTION, ❑ I OBJECT TO THIS REQUEST FOR A YARD REDUCTION. (NOTE THAT NEIGHBORS ARE UNDER NO OBLIGATION TO SIGN) AA,A1 /0'1V +horgnature Date Print Name Packet Pg. 223 PC-STR.Form10 (Rev 11-13-2009) NEIGHBORS FOR REQUEST OF YARD REDUCTION To be completed by Neighbor 1 Tcrtn c-.e— 14 s , am the legal owner of property (Name) located at (address - number and st eet) with the following legal description: Lot: Block: Tract: which is an adjoining property (including across the street) to the project address. I am aware that a reduction of required yards is being applied for at the subject property and have reviewed the plans presented to me by the petitioner for the proposed construction. I HAVE NO OBJECTION TO GRANTING MY CONSENT FOR THE AFOREMENTIONED REQUEST FOR N. / �cOpDSG ft,�n,s C004 on Vjts s rc(� a 13 ZNap lktS,,'eG ❑ I OBJECT TO THIS REQUEST FOR A YARD REDUCTION. (NOTE THAT NEIGHBORS ARE UNDER NO OBLIGATION TO SIGN) �I �hS,� q - Zd - 2t12d Neighbor Signature Date Print Name �- PC-STR.Form10 (Rev 11-13-2009) wevw.lacity org Packet Pg. 224 3.B.d Sign Installed Feb. 19, 2021 Packet Pg. 225 3.B.d (CHAPTER 8, COLLIER COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE FOR LAND DEVELOPMENT) A zoning sign(s) must he posted by the petitioner or the petitioner's agent on the parcel for a minimum of fifteen (I5) calendar days in advance of the first public hearing and said sign(s) must be maintained by the petitioner or the petitioner's agent through the Board of County Commissioners Hearing. Below are general guidelines for signs, however these guidelines should not be construed to supersede any requirement of the LDC. For specific sign requirements, please refer to the Administrative Code, Chapter 8 E. I _ The sign(s) must be erected in full view of the public, not more than five (5) feet from the nearest street right -of --way or easement. 2. The sign(s) must be securely affixed by nails, staples, or other means to a wood frame or to a wood panel and then fastened securely to a post, or other structure. The sign may not be affixed to a tree or other foliage. 3. The petitioner or the petitioner's agent must maintain the sign(s) in place, and readable condition until the requested action has been heard and a final decision rendered. If the sign(s) is destroyed, lost, or rendered unreadable, the petitioner or the petitioner's agent must replace the sign(s NOTE: AFTER THE SIGN HAS BEEN POSTED, THIS AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE SHOULD BE RETURNED NO LATER THAN TEN (10) WORKING DAYS BEFORE THE FIRST HEARING DATE TO THE ASSIGNED PLANNER. AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER BEFORE THE UNDERSIGNED AUTHORITY, PERSONALLY APPEARED swr Foley WHO ON OATH SAYS THAT HE/SHE HAS POSTED PROPER NOTICE AS REQUIRED BY SECTION 10.03.00 OF THE COLLIE&—G4;).UNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE ON THE PARCEL COVERED IN PETITION NUMBER 120 Edgemere Way S. APPLICANT OR AGENT STREET OR P_O. BOX Blair Foley L Naples, FL 34135 NAME (TYPED OR PRINTED) CITY, STATE ZIP STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER The foregoing instrument was sworn to and subscribed before me this 22 day of Feb , 2021 , by Blair Foley personally known to me who produced as identification and who did/did not take an oath_ bar �G=McLean ate of Florida `anfir- 15750721 My Commission Expires: 1110a!2021 (Stamp with serial number) Rev. 3/4/2015 U41X 09 i/mac Signature of Notary Public Amanda McLean Printed Name of Notary Public Packet Pg. 226 3.B.e Cof lie-r County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliercountvfl.gov 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Hybrid Virtual Quasi -Judicial Public Hearing Waiver Emergency/Executive Order 2020-04 Hearing of the Collier County Hearing Examiner For Petition Number(s): PL20200002057 Regarding the above subject petition number(s), Blair Foley, PE (Name of Applicant) elects to proceed during the declared emergency with hybrid virtual public hearing of the Collier County Hearing Examiner, and waives the right to contest any procedural irregularity due to the hybrid virtual nature of the public hearing. Name: Blair Signature: Date: Blair A Foley Digitally signed by Blair A Foley Date: 2021.02.18 15:33:15-05'00' R] Applicant* 11 Legal Counsel to Applicant * This form must be signed by either the Applicant (if the applicant is a corporate entity, this must be an officer of the corporate entity) or the legal counsel to the Applicant. Packet Pg. 227