DSAC Agenda 02/03/2021Development Services Advisory
Committee
Meeting
Wednesday, February 3, 2021
3:00 pm
2800 N. Horseshoe Dr.
Naples, FL 34104
Growth Management Department
Conference Rooms 609/610
If you have any questions or wish to meet with
staff, please contact
Trish Mill at 252-8214
For more information please contact Trish Mill at (239) 252-8214 or Patricia.Mill@colliercountyfl.gov
Development Services Advisory Committee
Wednesday, February 3, 2021
3:00 pm
2800 N. Horseshoe Dr., Naples, FL 34104
Growth Management Building, Conference Rooms 609/610
NOTICE:
AS PART OF AN ONGOING INITIATIVE TO PROMOTE SOCIAL DISTANCING DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC, THE
PUBLIC WILL HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY TO PROVIDE PUBLIC COMMENTS REMOTELY, AS WELL AS IN PERSON,
DURING THIS PROCEEDING. INDIVIDUALS WHO WOULD LIKE TO PARTICIPATE REMOTELY, SHOULD REGISTER ANY
TIME AFTER THE AGENDA IS POSTED ON THE COUNTY WEBSITE WHICH IS 6 DAYS BEFORE THE MEETING THROUGH
THE LINK PROVIDED, LISTING THE TOPIC THEY WISH TO ADDRESS. INDIVIDUALS WHO REGISTER WILL RECEIVE AN
EMAIL IN ADVANCE OF THE PUBLIC HEARING DETAILING HOW THEY CAN PARTICIPATE REMOTELY IN THIS MEETING.
FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ABOUT THE MEETING, PLEASE CALL TRISH MILL AT (239) 252-8214 OR REGISTER
AT: http://bit.ly/DSACSpeakerRegistrationFeb032021
THIS LINK CAN ALSO BE USED FOR THOSE THAT WOULD LIKE TO VIEW THE MEETING BUT NOT SPEAK. CHOOSE
THE FIRST OPTION “I DO NOT WISH TO SPEAK- VIEWING ONLY” AS YOUR AGENDA ITEM.
Persons wishing to speak on any Agenda item will receive up to three (3) minutes unless the Chairman adjusts the
time. Please wait to be recognized by the Chairman and speak into a microphone. State your name and affiliation
before commenting. During the discussion, Committee Members may direct questions to the speaker.
Please silence cell phones and digital devices. There may not be a break in this meeting. Please mute your audio if
you have not been recognized by the Chairman to speak or to conduct any personal business. All parties
participating in the public meeting are to observe Roberts Rules of Order and wait to be recognized by the Chairman.
Please speak one at a time and into the microphone so the Hearing Reporter can record all statements being made.
For more information please contact Trish Mill at (239) 252-8214 or Patricia.Mill@colliercountyfl.gov
Agenda:
1. Call to order - Chairman
2. Approval of Agenda
3. Approval of Minutes:
a. DSAC Meeting – December 2, 2020
b. DSAC LDR Subcommittee Meeting – December 15, 2020
4. Selection of Chair and Vice Chair
5. Public Speakers
6. Staff Announcements/Updates
a. Code Enforcement Division update – [Mike Ossorio]
b. Public Utilities Department update – [Eric Fey or designee]
c. Growth Management Department Transportation Engineering Division & Planning Division
updates – [Jay Ahmad or designee]
d. Collier County Fire Review update – [Shar Beddow or Shawn Hanson]
e. North Collier Fire Review update – [Capt. Sean Lintz or Daniel Zunzunegui]
f. Operations & Regulatory Mgmt. Division update – [Ken Kovensky]
g. Development Review Division update – [Matt McLean]
h. Zoning Division update – [Anita Jenkins or designee]
7. New Business
a. LDC Amendments
i. PL20200002505 – Public Notice Distance – Urban & Rural Golden Gate Estates
ii. PL20200002512 – Golf Course Conversions – Soil & Groundwater Testing
8. Old Business
9. Committee Member Comments
10. Adjourn
FUTURE MEETING DATES:
March 3, 2021 – 3:00 pm
April 7, 2021 – 3:00 pm
May 5, 2021 – 3:00 pm
December 2, 2020
1
MINUTES OF THE COLLIER COUNTY
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING
Naples, Florida, December 2, 2020
LET IT BE REMEMBERED, the Collier County Development Services Advisory
Committee in and for the County of Collier, having conducted business herein, met on
this date at 3:00 P.M. in REGULAR SESSION at the Collier County Growth Management
Department Building, Conference Room #609/610, 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive, Naples,
Florida, with the following members present:
Chairman: William J. Varian
Vice Chairman: Blair Foley
David Dunnavant
James E. Boughton (Excused)
Clay Brooker
Chris Mitchell
Robert Mulhere
Mario Valle
Norman Gentry (Zoom)
Marco Espinar (Excused)
Laura Spurgeon DeJohn
Jeremy Sterk (Zoom)
Jeff Curl
John English (Excused)
Mark McLean (Excused)
ALSO PRESENT: Jamie French, Deputy Department Head
Patricia Mill, Operations Analyst, Staff Liaison
Eric Fey, Sr. Project Manager, Public Utilities
Mike Ossorio, Director, Code Enforcement Division
Jon Walsh, Chief Building Inspector
Rich Long, Director, Plans Review and Inspections
Jamie Cook, Principal Environmental Specialist
December 2, 2020
2
Any persons in need of the verbatim record of the meeting may request a copy of the audio recording from
the Collier County Growth Management Department.
1. Call to Order - Chairman
Chairman Varian called the meeting to order at 3:00 p.m.
Mr. Mulhere moved to allow the Members on Zoom to participate in the meeting due to an
extraordinary circumstance. Second by Mr. Brooker. Carried unanimously 9 – 0.
2. Approval of Agenda
Mr. Curl moved to approve the Agenda. Second by Mr. Valle. Carried unanimously 10 - 0.
3. Approval of Minutes from November 4, 2020 Meeting
Mr. Foley moved to approve the minutes of the November 4, 2020 meeting as presented. Second by Mr.
Curl. Carried unanimously 10 - 0.
Mr. Sterk joined the meeting at 3:10 p.m.
4. Public Speakers
None
5. Staff Announcements/Updates
a. Code Enforcement Division update – [Mike Ossorio]
Mr. Ossorio provided the report “Code Enforcement Division Monthly Report October 22 –
November 21, 2020 Highlights” for information purposes. He noted:
• He continues to address staffing issues with new investigators hired and a search for 3 temp
workers.
• Staff continues to enforce the “mask order” with the complaints generated via public reporting
and at this point, appeals of the Citations are heard by the Special Magistrate.
• Community cleanups and enforcement on the placement of life-style signs continues.
• The Division has negotiated the release of fines and liens in the amount of approximately $4M.
b. Public Utilities Division update – [Tom Chmelik or designee]
Mr. Fey submitted the monthly report on response time for “Letters of Availability, Utility Deviations
and FDEP Permits” for information purposes. He noted:
• A response times by staff continue to improve.
• A meeting was held with Growth Management Division staff to review avenues to streamline
responses to the requests.
• A purchase order with Stantec has been executed to assist staff in their duties.
• A subcommittee meeting will be held later in December to review changes to the Utility
Standards Manual and Utilities Acceptance Ordinance.
c. Growth Management Department/Transportation Engineering and/or Planning – [Jay Ahmad
or designee]
None
d. County Fire Review update – [Shar Beddow and/or Shawn Hanson]
December 2, 2020
3
Ms. Beddow reported turnaround times are as follows: Building Plan review – 2 days; Site Plan
reviews – 2 days; Inspections – 1 to 2 days. The 2020 Fire Marshall Skeet Shoot is scheduled for
December 5th with appropriate health safety measures given the pandemic.
e. North Naples Fire Review update – [Capt. Sean Lintz or Daniel Zunzunegui]
Mr. Zunzunegui reported turnaround times are as follows: Building Plan review – 2 days; Site Plan
reviews – 2 days; Inspections – 1 day. He noted:
• Staff continues to utilize video inspections when possible.
• Staff continues to review avenues to streamline their processes.
• A free COVID-19 antibody screening will be available on December 11th at their headquarters
building.
f. Operations & Regulatory Mgmt. Division update [Ken Kovensky]
Mr. Long submitted the “Collier County November 2020 Monthly Statistics” which outlined the
building plan and land development review activities. He noted business remains steady averaging
950 inspections daily and measures were taken to shorten the “intake time” at the facility.
g. Development Review Division update [Matt McLean]
Ms. Cook reported
• The process for wetlands reviews for single family housing permits has been updated and if the
wetlands are located on the opposite side of a disturbed area, the permit will be approved. If
there are wetlands in the vicinity of an area proposed for disturbance, a review by FDEP is
required. A meeting is scheduled with FDEP (Florida Department of Environmental
Protection) on December 1 to review the process moving forward.
• Staff is brining an item before the BCC (Board of County Commissioners) regarding the
Easement Use Agreement whereby replacement of like to like equipment will be
“grandfathered.” A recommendation on the item may be provided by the Development
Advisory Services Committee if they so desire.
Mr. Foley moved to support staff’s recommendation to “grandfather” the replacement of “like to
like” equipment under the County’s Easement Use Agreement including not requiring a long form,
short form or any fee for the change out. Second by Mr. Curl. Carried unanimously 11 – 0.
h. Zoning Division Update [Anita Jenkins or Designee]
Ms. Jenkins reported:
• Staffing issues continue to be addressed to ensure service remains at an acceptable level.
• Staff is looking at the process to determine any improvements which may be made to improve
the operation.
• Based on recent Growth Management Plan amendments, Land Development Code
amendments will be brought forth for Subcommittee review in the near future.
6. New Business
a. New building code substantial improvement 50% rule affecting any structure that does not meet
base plus 1 foot – requested by Bill Varian [Jonathan Walsh]
Mr. Walsh reported:
December 2, 2020
4
• Improvements to structures in the floodplain greater than 50 percent of the appraised value of
the building require compliance of the entire structure in accordance with current floodplain
regulations.
• The County’s policy requires building valuation being determined by the County’s or private
appraisal.
• If an applicant goes through the permit process and closes out a permit for proposed work, any
new permit application requires a new appraisal whereby the building may be improved up to
50 percent of the new value without triggering compliance with current regulations.
• This avenue for phasing work is more problematic when a substantial improvement is required
due to damage to the structure as opposed to a voluntary renovation.
b. Paperless permit project timeline update and Self Issuance Permits [Danny Condomina]
Mr. Condomina presented the PowerPoint “Paperless Permit Project” and “Self Issuance Permits”
noting:
• Staff continues to review process to ensure it is user friendly
• The schedule for implementing Paperless permits is: Public Announcement – January 20,
2021; Customer Training March 2021; Drop off Date March 22, 2021 and EPR Hard date
April 20, 2021.
• A new format is being developed whereby licensed contractors may “self issue” permits for
certain activities such as residential “like to like” single and multi family water heaters, 1 - 2
family air conditioner replacements (under 5 ton), low voltage alarms, irrigation not located in
a public right of way, Code Enforcement Garage Sale permits, etc.
• Inspections will still be required to complete the self issuing permit process.
The Committee recommended the County consider adding pool heaters/equipment for self issuing permits.
7. Old Business
Mr. French reported investigation is underway to determine any functions of the Development Review
Division which may be transferred to the Zoning Division to aid in improving the operation of the
Division.
He notified the Committee he is leaving the Growth Management Department to assume the position of
Director of the Public Services Department and the members thanked him for his service to the industry
and public over the years.
The Committee requested staff appear at a future meeting to notify them of any Departmental changes
which may occur as a result of Mr. French vacating his position.
8. Committee Member Comments
None
9. Adjourn
Future Meeting Dates:
January 6, 2021 - 3:00 p.m. (Cancelled)
February 3, 2021 – 3:00 p.m.
March 3, 2021 – 3:00 p.m.
December 2, 2020
5
There being no further business for the good of the County, the meeting was adjourned by the order of
the Chair at 4:15 p.m.
COLLIER COUNTY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
ADVISORY COMMITTEE
______________________________________
Chairman, William Varian
These Minutes were approved by the Board/Chairman on _______________, as presented _______, or as
amended ________.
December 15, 2020
1
MINUTES OF THE COLLIER COUNTY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
ADVISORY COMMITTEE LAND DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
SUBCOMMITTEE
Naples, Florida, December 15, 2020
LET IT BE REMEMBERED, the Collier County Development Services Advisory
Committee – Land Development Review Subcommittee in and for the County of Collier,
having conducted business herein, met on this date at 2:00 PM in a REGULAR
SESSION at the Growth Management Department Building, Room 609/610 2800 N.
Horseshoe Drive, Naples, FL with the following persons present:
Chairman: Clay Brooker
Blair Foley (via Zoom)
Robert Mulhere (via Zoom)
Jeff Curl
Mark McLean (via Zoom)
ALSO PRESENT: Jeremy Frantz, LDC Manager
Richard Henderlong, Principal Planner
Eric Johnson, Principal Planner
Sean Kingston, Senior Planner
December 15, 2020
2
Any persons in need of the verbatim record of the meeting may request a copy of the audio recording
from the Collier County Growth Management Division – Planning and Regulation building.
The meeting was held via Zoom and attendance in the conference room.
1. Call to order
Chairman Brooker called the meeting to order at 2:00 p.m. and a quorum was established.
2. Approve agenda
Mr. Curl moved to approve the Agenda. Second by Mr. Brooker. Carried unanimously 5 – 0.
3. Old Business
None
4. New Business
a. LDC Amendments
i. PL20200002482 – TDR Base Credit Change in Rural Fringe Mixed Use District
(RFMUD)
LDC Section to be Amended: 2.03.07 Overlay Zoning Districts
Mr. Johnson presented the proposed amendment noting it eliminates the $25,000 minimum
value of the TDR Base Credit for the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District.
Committee discussion occurred noting:
• It would be beneficial to cite the work undertaken by the Growth Oversight
Management Committee in the narrative for the proposed amendment.
• It is anticipated the proposed amendment is a forerunner to other proposed
amendments for the RFMUD to be brought forward following an extensive restudy of
the area.
• The goal is for the credits to be market valued increasing the ability for those
landowners in the program to exercise their rights under the requirements of the
District.
Mr. Mulhere moved for the Development Services Advisory Committee to recommend the
Board of County Commissioners adopt the proposed amendment subject to adding
language on the Growth Management Oversight Committee’s involvement in the restudy
of the District. Second by Mr. Curl. Carried unanimously 5 – 0.
ii. PL2020000XXXX - Golf Course Conversions – Soil & Groundwater Testing
LDC Section to be Amended: 3.08.00 Environmental Data Requirements
5.05.15 Conversion of Golf Courses
Mr. Kingston presented the proposed amendment noting it clarifies when soil and
groundwater sampling is required in the development review process for the conversion of
golf courses to non-golf course uses. It is intended to grant an applicant flexibility in the
process by deferring the required soil and/or groundwater sampling to the time of the early
work authorization, site development plan (SDP), and subdivision plat (PPL) submittal. It
also modifies the required timing of all soil and/or groundwater sampling in LDC section
3.08.00 A.4.d.ii to the time of the EWA, SDP, or PPL. Since the amendment was distributed
to the Subcommittee, a couple of minor typos have been corrected and the Administrative
Code was changed to reference the Land Development Code as necessary.
December 15, 2020
3
During Subcommittee discussion, the following was noted:
• Consideration should be given to developing a fee schedule to be used as a guideline
for those involved in the process, so they are aware when certain payments are due.
• Although the requirement defers the timing for the testing, it does not preclude those
involved in the process from performing the tests at any time.
• It is beneficial to applicants and landowners given the ability to defer the timing to a
time after the “Intent to Convert” process has been completed.
• Other types of conversions of uses such as those in Agricultural Land utilize the same
process as proposed.
• The proposed amendment was driven by private landowner activities, not the
County’s involvement in activities associated with the Golden Gate Golf Course
conversion.
• The Pollution Control Department reviewed the proposal and did not voice an
objection.
Mr. Mulhere stated he would be abstaining due to a conflict of interest stemming from a
project he is working on.
Mr. Foley moved for the Development Services Advisory Committee to recommend the
Board of County Commissioners adopt the proposed amendment as presented by staff.
Second by Mr. McLean. Motion carried unanimously 4 – 0. Mr. Mulhere abstained.
iii. PL20200002400 – Collier Blvd./I-75 Interchange Zoning Overlay (CBIIZO)
LDC Section to be Amended: 1.08.01 Abbreviations
2.03.07 Overlay Zoning Districts
4.02.37 Specific Design Standards for Development in the
Collier Boulevard/Interstate 75 Innovation Zone Overlay
(new section)
Mr. Foley left the meeting at 3:03 p.m.
Mr. Frantz presented the proposed amendment noting it creates the Collier Boulevard/I75
Innovation Zone Overlay (CBIIZO), implementing the economic development goals of the
Interchange Activity Center No. 9 Innovation Zone recently approved by the County (2018).
The CBIIZO is a new zoning overlay adding several industrial, manufacturing, and movie
production uses as permitted uses.
The following was noted during Subcommittee discussions:
• The allowed uses prescribed area as identified by the North American Industry
Classification System.
• Some uses allowed within the classifications have been excluded, while others will
require permitting as a conditional use.
• Concern over the amount of heavy truck traffic serving the landfill and it may be
advantageous to investigate the feasibility of creating a separate access road for the
landfill operation – staff noted this is out of the scope of the amendment or GMD
operations.
December 15, 2020
4
• Another option may be to develop a separate access road (where feasible) off the
main road to help improve traffic flow and the facilitate traffic movements for the
large trucks needing to access the proposed uses.
• Concern on allowing 0.5-foot candle adjacent to property lines creating the potential
for light spillover onto neighboring lands.
• Consideration should be given to allowing the uses with shared buffer zones to reduce
the required widths of each from 10-feet to 5-feet.
• The uses permitted in the underlying district will still be allowed to be developed in
conformance with those design standards outlined for the underlying district. The
proposed amendment is intended to promote conformity of uses and operations as
opposed to design standards.
• Consideration should be given to improving the various location maps in the
proposed amendment to ensure they are easier for the user to identify the areas in
question.
• The uses identified for the overlay zone are only allowed on lands where the
underlying zoning district does not permit residential development.
• It would be beneficial to review the cross-referenced code sections cited to ensure
they are easy for a user to identify when searching for the specific details intended to
be referenced.
Mr. Curl moved for the Development Services Advisory Committee to recommend the
Board of County Commissioners adopt the proposed amendment as presented by staff.
Second by Mr. McLean. Carried unanimously 4 – 0.
iv. PL20200002505 – Public Notice Distance – Urban & Rural Golden Gate Estates
LDC Section to be Amended: 10.03.05 - Required Methods of Providing Public Notice
Mr. Mulhere left the meeting at 3:35 p.m.
Mr. Henderlong presented the proposed amendment noting it increases the written public
notification distance to property owners for land use petitions within the Rural and Urban
Golden Gate Estates of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan (GGAMP). It also requires an
amendment to the Administrative Code regarding public notice procedures for land use
petitions.
The following was noted during Subcommittee discussions:
• Concern expressed by Mr. McLean on the notifications to adjacent property owners
given many of those notified are not impacted by the proposal yet may raise issues
related to the application.
• The proposed amendment seeks to ensure those property owners on dead end streets
fall within a notification distance.
• Although the owners in question may not receive written notice, they generally drive
by the area in question repeatedly which is required to post signage on changes in use,
effectively providing them notice on the activity.
• Concern the notification distance for the Urban area is too great given the likelihood
of notifying a large number of property owners, many of those unaffected by the
proposal.
December 15, 2020
5
• It would be beneficial to divide the Urban and Rural area notifications requirements
into separately identified distances given the nature the properties have been
developed over the course of time.
Mr. Curl moved for the Development Services Advisory Committee to recommend the
Board of County Commissioners adopt the proposed amendment subject to amending the
provisions to a notification distances to 1,500 lineal feet for the Urban Sub Element and
2,500 lineal feet for the Rural Sub Element of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan. Second
by Mr. McLean. Carried unanimously 3 – 0.
b. Discussion of County’s LDC amendment website
Mr. Frantz noted the website is being revamped and if Subcommittee Members have any
recommendations, they should contact staff.
The Subcommittee noted it would be advantageous to review the links in the CityView portal to
make sure they are up to date.
c. 2021 Schedule (March 16, June 15, September 21, and December 21)
Mr. Frantz updated the Subcommittee on the 2021 meeting schedule. During discussions it was
noted the December meeting may be rescheduled to earlier in the month due to the scheduled
date’s proximity to the Christmas Holiday.
5. Public comments
None
There being no further business for the good of the County, the meeting was adjourned by the
order of the Chair at 3:56 P.M.
COLLIER COUNTY DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
ADVISORY COMMITTEE - LAND DEVELOPMENT
REVIEW SUBCOMMITTEE
______________________________________
These Minutes were approved by the Committee on ________________, as presented _______, or as
amended ________.
December 22, 2020 – January 21, 2021 Code Cases by Category
This report reflects monthly data from December 22, 2020 – January 21, 2021`
Code Enforcement Division Monthly Report
December 22, 2020 – January 21, 2021 Highlights
• Cases opened: 620
• Cases closed due to voluntary compliance: 409
• Property inspections: 2542
• Lien searches requested: 1649
Trends
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
Jan-20 Feb-20 Mar-20 Apr-20 May-20 Jun-20 Jul-20 Aug-20 Sep-20 Oct-20 Nov-20 Dec-20
630 580
821
945
854 806
995
853
889
787
650 620
Cases Opened Per Month
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
Jan-20 Feb-20 Mar-20 Apr-20 May-20 Jun-20 Jul-20 Aug-20 Sep-20 Oct-20 Nov-20 Dec-20
2374
2594
2870
3273
3839
3304
3553
3011
3325
3010
2103
2542
Code Inspections Per Month
December 22, 2020 – January 21, 2021 Code Cases by Category
This report reflects monthly data from December 22, 2020 – January 21, 2021`
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
2020 2021
5358
710
4196
560
Origin of Case
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
2000
Bayshore Immokalee
24 51
1311
1900 CRA
Case Opened
Monthly
December 22, 2020 – January 21, 2021 Code Cases by Category
This report reflects monthly data from December 22, 2020 – January 21, 2021`
Case Type Common issues associated with Case Type
Accessory Use – Fence permits, fence maintenance, canopies, shades, guesthouse renting etc.
Animals – Prohibited animals, too many animals, etc.
Commercial - Shopping carts
Executive Order – Emergency/Executive Mask Order
Land Use – Prohibited land use, roadside stands, outdoor storage, synthetic drugs, zoning issues, etc.
Noise - Construction, early morning landscaping, bar or club, outdoor bands, etc.
Nuisance Abatement – Litter, grass overgrowth, waste container pits, exotics, etc.
Occupational Licensing – Home occupation violations, no business tax receipts, kenneling. etc.
Parking Enforcement - Parking within public right-of-way, handicap parking, etc.
Property Maintenance - Unsanitary conditions, no running water, green pools, structure in disrepair, etc.
Protected Species - Gopher Tortoise, sea turtles lighting, bald eagles, etc.
Right of Way - Construction in the public right-of-way, damaged culverts, obstruction to public right-of-way,
etc.
Signs - No sign permits, illegal banners, illegal signs on private property, etc.
Site Development -Building permits, building alterations, land alterations, etc.
Temporary Land Use - Special events, garage sales, promotional events, sidewalk sales, etc.
Vegetation Requirements – Tree maintenance, sight distance triangle, tree pruning, land clearing, landfill,
preserves, etc.
Vehicles - License plates invalid, inoperable vehicles, grass parking, RV parking, other vehicle parking
etc.
Animals
1%Accessory Use
1%Executive Order
6%Land Use
8%
Noise
3%
Nuisance Abatement
23%
Occupational Licensing
1%
Parking Enforcement
8%
Property Maintenance
6%
Right of Way
6%
Signs
3%
Site Development
7%
Vehicles
22%
Vegetation
Requirements
6%
November 22, 2020 – December 21, 2020 Code Cases by Category
This report reflects monthly data from November 22, 2020 – December 21, 2020
Case Type Common Issues Associated with Case Type
Accessory Use – Fence permits, fence maintenance, canopies, shades, guesthouse renting etc.
Animals – Prohibited animals, too many animals, etc.
Commercial - Shopping carts
Executive Order – Emergency/Executive Mask Order
Land Use – Prohibited land use, roadside stands, outdoor storage, synthetic drugs, zoning issues, etc.
Noise - Construction, early morning landscaping, bar or club, outdoor bands, etc.
Nuisance Abatement – Litter, grass overgrowth, waste container pits, exotics, etc.
Occupational Licensing – Home occupation violations, no business tax receipts, kenneling. etc.
Parking Enforcement - Parking within public right-of-way, handicap parking, etc.
Property Maintenance - Unsanitary conditions, no running water, green pools, structure in disrepair, etc.
Protected Species - Gopher Tortoise, sea turtles lighting, bald eagles, etc.
Right of Way - Construction in the public right-of-way, damaged culverts, obstruction to public right-of-way,
etc.
Signs - No sign permits, illegal banners, illegal signs on private property, etc.
Site Development -Building permits, building alterations, land alterations, etc.
Temporary Land Use - Special events, garage sales, promotional events, sidewalk sales, etc.
Vegetation Requirements – Tree maintenance, sight distance triangle, tree pruning, land clearing, landfill,
preserves, etc.
Vehicles - License plates invalid, inoperable vehicles, grass parking, RV parking, other vehicle parking
etc.
Animals
2%Accessory Use
2%Executive Order
3%Land Use
7%
Noise
4%
Nuisance Abatement
25%
Occupational Licensing
2%Parking Enforcement
8%
Property Maintenance
7%
Right of Way
8%
Signs
6%
Site Development
7%
Vehicles
18%
Vegetation
Requirements
2%
October 22, 2020 – November 21, 2020 Code Cases by Category
This report reflects monthly data from October 22, 2020 – November 21, 2020
Case Type Common Issues Associated with Case Type
Accessory Use – Fence permits, fence maintenance, canopies, shades, guesthouse renting etc.
Animals – Prohibited animals, too many animals, etc.
Commercial - Shopping carts
Executive Order – Emergency/Executive Mask Order
Land Use – Prohibited land use, roadside stands, outdoor storage, synthetic drugs, zoning issues, etc.
Noise - Construction, early morning landscaping, bar or club, outdoor bands, etc.
Nuisance Abatement – Litter, grass overgrowth, waste container pits, exotics, etc.
Occupational Licensing – Home occupation violations, no business tax receipts, kenneling. etc.
Parking Enforcement - Parking within public right-of-way, handicap parking, etc.
Property Maintenance - Unsanitary conditions, no running water, green pools, structure in disrepair, etc.
Protected Species - Gopher Tortoise, sea turtles lighting, bald eagles, etc.
Right of Way - Construction in the public right-of-way, damaged culverts, obstruction to public right-of-way,
etc.
Signs - No sign permits, illegal banners, illegal signs on private property, etc.
Site Development -Building permits, building alterations, land alterations, etc.
Temporary Land Use - Special events, garage sales, promotional events, sidewalk sales, etc.
Vegetation Requirements – Tree maintenance, sight distance triangle, tree pruning, land clearing, landfill,
preserves, etc.
Vehicles - License plates invalid, inoperable vehicles, grass parking, RV parking, other vehicle parking
etc.
Animals…Accessory Use
1%Executive Order
5%Land Use
7%
Noise
1%
Nuisance Abatement
25%
Occupational Licensing
2%
Parking Enforcement
6%
Property Maintenance
10%
Right of Way
5%
Signs
3%
Site
Development
9%
Vehicles
20%
Vegetation Requirements
4%
Public Utilities Department
Engineering and Project Management Division
1 1 1 1 1 1
10 10
26
18
9 9
45
29
53
34
38
29
7
15 15
9
7
10
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Jul-20 Aug-20 Sep-20 Oct-20 Nov-20 Dec-20 RequestsBusiness DaysResponse Time - Letters of Availability
Requests Completed Minimum Average Maximum Requests Received
Public Utilities Department
Engineering and Project Management Division
0.4
0.3
1.8
1.0 0.9
0.7
0.9 1.2
1.3
1.4
2.0
1.1
18
25
23
25
23
18
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
0
1
1
2
2
3
3
4
Jul-20 Aug-20 Sep-20 Oct-20 Nov-20 Dec-20 RequestsBusiness DaysResponse Time - Utility Deviations
Requests Completed Sufficiency Review Time Substantive Review Time Requests Received
Public Utilities Department
Engineering and Project Management Division
37
19
9
3 3 3
4
6
2
2 2 1
8
0
3
6
2
1
3
6
17
9
12
9
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
Jul-20 Aug-20 Sep-20 Oct-20 Nov-20 Dec-20 RequestsBusiness DaysResponse Time - FDEP Permits
Requests Completed Initial Review Time Revision Review Time Director Approval Time Requests Received
1
L:\LDC Amendments\Advisory Boards and Public Hearings\DSAC\2021\02-03-21\Meeting Materials\10.03.05 GG Estates Public Notification
2-03-21 DSAC.docx
LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT
PETITION
PL2020002025
SUMMARY OF AMENDMENT
This amendment shall increase the written public notification distance to
property owners for land use petitions within the Rural and Urban Golden
Gate Estates of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan (GGAMP). It
implements the GGAMP and requires an amendment to the Administrative
Code regarding public notice procedures for land use petitions.
LDC SECTION TO BE AMENDED
10.03.05-Required Methods of Providing Public Notice
ORIGIN
Growth Management
Department
HEARING DATES
BCC TBD
CCPC TBD
DSAC 02-03-21
DSAC-LDR 12-15-20
ADVISORY BOARD RECOMMENDATIONS
DSAC-LDR
Approval with recommendation
DSAC
TBD
CCPC
TBD
BACKGROUND
On September 24, 2019 the Board adopted two GGAMP policies, 4.2.4 of the Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub-
Element and 3.2.4 of the Urban Golden Gate Estates Sub-Element. These policies stipulate the County shall
initiate a review of written public notification to homeowners for land use petitions in the Rural and Urban Golden
Gate Estates area in the LDC and Administrative Code. Recognizing the low density characteristics of the Urban
and Rural Golden Gate, the policies objectives are to consider increasing the notification distance with particular
attention to be given to properties located on dead-end Estates streets or avenues. Further, the GGAMP restudy
2017 white paper suggested the notice requirements be extended the length of any dead-end street or avenue where
a direct transportation or aesthetic impact can be anticipated.
Currently, mailed notices for land use petitions are sent to property owners within 500 feet of the property lines
of the subject property for areas in the urban designated area of the future land use element of the GMP and within
1,000 feet for all other areas. For the Rural and Urban Golden Gate Estates area, the mailed notice requirement
for land use petitions has been 1,000 feet from the subject property.
To evaluate different notification distances and compare the percentage of parcel notifications captured within the
prescribed areas, staff performed an analysis of four areas. The notification distances utilized were 1,000 feet,
1,500 feet, 2,000 feet and 2,500 feet from the subject properties. The four GGAMP Estates designations studied
were; the Randall Boulevard Commercial Subdistrict (56.50 acres), Wilson Blvd./Golden Gate Blvd.
Neighborhood Center (18.34 acres), Golden Gate Parkway Institutional Subdistrict (16.30 acres) and Golden Gate
Blvd/Everglades Blvd. Neighborhood Center (18.34 acres). Abutting transitional conditional use parcels, which
are areas located between an existing non-residential and residential area, were also included. All notification
distances intersect several dead-end streets or avenues which typically stop due to a perpendicular canal or
drainage flow way. Exhibit A illustrates the number and percentages of dead-end street or avenue parcels captured
by each of the notification distances.
Based on the selected areas, staff is recommending the public notification distance be extended from 1,000 feet to
2,500 feet. This notification distance had captured more the half of the parcels on dead end streets and in one case
94.8 percent of the dead-end street parcels. By adopting this notification distance, staff is able to automate the
notification to property owners without having to perform a manual review of all parcels on each intersecting
2
L:\LDC Amendments\Advisory Boards and Public Hearings\DSAC\2021\02-03-21\Meeting Materials\10.03.05 GG Estates Public Notification
2-03-21 DSAC.docx
dead-end street. It shall minimize the level of effort and added expense of staff time to manually identify each
dead end street parcel outside of the increased notification distance.
DSAC-LDR subcommittee recommendation
The subcommittee unanimously recommended approval with the following change:
• The mailed notice distance should remain 2,500 feet for the designated areas of the Rural Golden Gate
Estates Sub-Element of the GGAMP and change to 1,500 feet in the designated areas of the Urban Golden
Gate Estates Sub-Element of the GGAMP. The recommended change to the mailed notification distance
for the Urban Golden Estates area was determined to be excessive and consistent with the same distance
requirement of 1,500 feet for a golf course conversion to a non-golf course use public notice.
This recommendation was incorporated in the amendment.
FISCAL & OPERATIONAL IMPACTS
There will be an added expense to notify
additional properties by the petitioner.
GMP CONSISTENCY
To be provided by Comprehensive Planning Staff.
EXHIBITS: A) Estates Dead-End Street Parcel Notification Table
DRAFT Text underlined is new text to be added
Text strikethrough is current text to be deleted
3
L:\LDC Amendments\Advisory Boards and Public Hearings\DSAC\2021\02-03-21\Meeting Materials\10.03.05 GG Estates Public
Notification 2-03-21 DSAC.docx
Amend the LDC as follows:
10.03.05 – Required Methods of Providing Public Notice
1
This section shall establish the required methods of providing public notice. Chapter 8 of the 2
Administrative Code shall establish the public notice procedures for land use petitions. 3
4
A. Neighborhood Information Meetings (NIM). Neighborhood Information Meetings, where 5
required, shall be held prior to the first public hearing and noticed as follows: 6
7
1. Mailed Notice shall be sent prior to the NIM and shall be pursuant to LDC section 8
10.03.05 B. 9
10
2. Newspaper Advertisement prior to the NIM. 11
12
B. Mailed Notice. 13
14
1. Where required, Mailed Notice shall be sent to property owners in the 15
notification area as follows: 16
a. For areas in the urban designated area of the future land use 17
element of the Growth Management Plan notices shall be sent to 18
all property owners within 500 feet of the property lines of the 19
subject property. 20
b. For all other areas, except areas designated in the Rural Golden 21
Gate Estates Sub-Element or Urban Golden Gate Estates Sub-22
Elements of the Golden Gate Area Master Plan, notices shall be 23
sent to all property owners within 1,000 feet of the property lines of 24
the subject property. 25
c. For areas designated within the Rural Golden Gate Estates Sub-26
Element of the Golden Gate Master Plan, notices shall be sent to 27
all property owners within 2,500 feet of the subject property lines. 28
For areas designated within the Urban Golden Gate Estates Sub-29
Element of the Golden Gate Master Plan, notices shall be sent to 30
all property owners within 1,500 feet of the subject property lines. 31
c. d. Notices shall also be sent to property owners and condominium and 32
civic associations whose members may be impacted by the 33
proposed land use changes and who have formally requested the 34
county to be notified. A list of such organizations must be provided 35
and maintained by the county, but the applicant must bear the 36
responsibility of insuring that all parties are notified. 37
* * * * * * * * * * * * * 38
# # # # # # # # # # # # # 39
Exhibit A – Estates Dead-End Street Parcel Notification Table
4
L:\LDC Amendments\Advisory Boards and Public Hearings\DSAC\2021\02-03-21\Meeting Materials\10.03.05 GG Estates Public
Notification 2-03-21 DSAC.docx
Parcel Notification Distances By Subdistricts-Limited to Intersecting Dead End Streets 1
Data Provided by GIS/Addressing Section(11-24-20) 2
3
4
5
Exhibit A – Estates Dead-End Street Parcel Notification Table
5
L:\LDC Amendments\Advisory Boards and Public Hearings\DSAC\2021\02-03-21\Meeting Materials\10.03.05 GG Estates Public
Notification 2-03-21 DSAC.docx
1
2
Exhibit A – Estates Dead-End Street Parcel Notification Table
6
L:\LDC Amendments\Advisory Boards and Public Hearings\DSAC\2021\02-03-21\Meeting Materials\10.03.05 GG Estates Public
Notification 2-03-21 DSAC.docx
1
2
Exhibit A – Estates Dead-End Street Parcel Notification Table
7
L:\LDC Amendments\Advisory Boards and Public Hearings\DSAC\2021\02-03-21\Meeting Materials\10.03.05 GG Estates Public
Notification 2-03-21 DSAC.docx
1
2
3
1
G:\LDC Amendments\Advisory Boards and Public Hearings\DSAC\2021\02-03-21\Meeting Materials\Golf Course Conversion - Soil Sampling
DSAC 1-22-21.docx
LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE AMENDMENT
PETITION
PL20200002512
SUMMARY OF AMENDMENT
This amendment shall clarify when soil and/or groundwater sampling is
required in the development review process for the conversion of golf
courses to non-golf course uses.
ORIGIN
Growth Management
Department (GMD)
HEARING DATES LDC SECTION TO BE AMENDED
BCC TBD 3.08.00
5.05.15
ENVIRONMENTAL DATA REQUIREMENTS
Conversion of Golf Courses
CCPC TBD
DSAC 02/03/2021
DSAC-LDR 12/15/2020
ADVISORY BOARD RECOMMENDATIONS
DSAC-LDR
Approval
DSAC
TBD
CCPC
TBD
BACKGROUND
Per LDC section 5.05.15 G.6., soil and/or groundwater sampling is currently required at the time of application of
all zoning actions, Stewardship Receiving Area (SRA) amendments, and Compatibility Design Review
applications which are processed subsequently to completing the requirements of the Intent to Convert (ITC)
application from a golf course to non-golf course use.
Additionally, LDC section 3.08.00 A.4.d.ii. requires the soil and/or groundwater sampling to be completed at the
time of the first development order submittal.
This amendment is intended to grant an applicant flexibility in the development review process by deferring the
required soil and/or groundwater sampling to no later than the time of the early work authorization (EWA), site
development plan (SDP), or subdivision plat (PPL) submittal. These application types represent the first
development order when earthwork may occur. The amendment also relocates portions of the existing LDC
section 5.05.15 G.6. to LDC section 3.08.00 A.4.d.ii.a. In LDC section 5.05.15 G.6, the revised text maintains a
cross reference to LDC section 3.08.00 A.4.d., Environmental Data Requirements.
A revised companion Administrative Code amendment is required to modifiy the Application Content section of
Chapters 3.K (item 11) and 4.N (item 16).
FISCAL & OPERATIONAL IMPACTS
There are no anticipated fiscal or operational
impacts to the County associated with this
amendment.
GMP CONSISTENCY
The proposed LDC amendment has been reviewed by
Comprehensive Planing staff and may be deemed
consistent with the GMP.
EXHIBITS: A) Administrative Code Chapters 3.K.-Compatiblity Design Review and 4.N.-Intent to
Convert Application for Golf Course Conversions.
DRAFT Text underlined is new text to be added
Text strikethrough is current text to be deleted
2
G:\LDC Amendments\Advisory Boards and Public Hearings\DSAC\2021\02-03-21\Meeting Materials\Golf Course Conversion - Soil
Sampling DSAC 1-22-21.docx
Amend the LDC as follows:
1
3.08.00- ENVIRONMENTAL DATA REQUIREMENTS 2
3
A. Environmental Data Requirements. 4
5
* * * * * * * * * * * * * 6
7
4. Environmental Data. The following information shall be submitted, where 8
applicable, to evaluate projects. 9
10
* * * * * * * * * * * * * 11
12
d. General environmental requirements. 13
14
* * * * * * * * * * * * * 15
16
ii. Soil and/or ground water groundwater sampling shall be required at 17
the time of first development order submittal no later than time of 18
Early Work Authorization (EWA), SDP, or PPL submittal, whichever 19
is the first to occur, for sites that occupy farm fields (crop fields, 20
cattle dipping ponds, chemical mixing areas), golf courses, landfill 21
or junkyards or for sites where hazardous products exceeding 250 22
gallons of liquid or 1,000 pounds of solids were stored or processed 23
or where hazardous wastes in excess of 220 pounds per month or 24
110 gallons at any point in time were generated or stored. The 25
amount of sampling and testing shall be determined by a registered 26
professional with experience in the field of Environmental Site 27
Assessment and shall at a minimum test for organochlorine 28
pesticides (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) 8081) and 29
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) 8 metals using 30
Florida Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) soil 31
sampling Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) FS 3000, in areas 32
suspected of being used for mixing and at discharge point of water 33
management system. Sampling should occur randomly if no points 34
of contamination are obvious. Include a background soil analysis 35
from an undeveloped location hydraulically upgradient of the 36
potentially contaminated site. Soil sampling should occur just below 37
the root zone, about 6 to 12 inches below ground surface or as 38
otherwise agreed upon with the registered professional with 39
experience in the field of Environmental Site Assessment. Include 40
in or with the Environmental Site Assessment, the acceptable State 41
and Federal pollutant levels for the types of contamination found on 42
site and indicate in the Assessment, when the contaminants are 43
over these levels. If this analysis has been done as part of an 44
Environmental Audit then the report shall be submitted. The County 45
shall coordinate with the DEP where contamination exceeding 46
applicable DEP standards is identified on site or where an 47
DRAFT Text underlined is new text to be added
Text strikethrough is current text to be deleted
3
G:\LDC Amendments\Advisory Boards and Public Hearings\DSAC\2021\02-03-21\Meeting Materials\Golf Course Conversion - Soil
Sampling DSAC 1-22-21.docx
Environmental Audit or Environmental Assessment has been 48
submitted. 49
50
a) Conversion of golf courses have further soil and/or 51
groundwater sampling requirements. In addition to the 52
sampling requirements established in LDC section 3.08.00 53
A.4.d., the applicant shall conduct soil and/or groundwater 54
sampling for the pollutants as follows: managed turf, 55
chemical storage/mixing areas, and maintenance areas (i.e. 56
equipment storage and washing areas, fueling and fuel 57
storage areas) shall be tested for organophosphate, 58
carbamate, triazine pesticides, and chlorinated herbicides. 59
In addition, maintenance areas, as described above, shall 60
be tested for petroleum products. The County shall notify 61
the Department of Environmental Protection where 62
contamination exceeding applicable Department of 63
Environmental Protection standards is identified on site or 64
where an Environmental Audit or Environmental 65
Assessment has been submitted. 66
67
* * * * * * * * * * * * * 68
# # # # # # # # # # # # # 69
70
5.05.15 - Conversion of Golf Courses 71
72
* * * * * * * * * * * * * 73
74
G. Development standards. The following are additional minimum design standards for 75
zoning actions and Stewardship Receiving Area Amendments. The Compatibility Design 76
Review process shall only be subject to LDC section 5.05.15 G.6. 77
78
* * * * * * * * * * * * * 79
80
6. Soil and/or groundwater sampling may be deferred by the applicant to Early Work 81
Authorization (EWA), SDP, or PPL submittal, whichever is the first to occur, if the 82
sampling has not been completed by the rezoning, SRA amendment, or 83
compatibility design review public hearings. See LDC Section 3.08.00 A.4.d. In 84
addition to the soil and/or ground water sampling requirements established in LDC 85
section 3.08.00 A.4.d., the applicant shall conduct soil and/or groundwater 86
sampling for the pollutants as follows: managed turf, chemical storage/mixing 87
areas, and maintenance areas (i.e. equipment storage and washing areas, fueling 88
and fuel storage areas) shall be tested for organophosphate, carbamate, triazine 89
pesticides, and chlorinated herbicides. In addition, maintenance areas, as 90
described above, shall be tested for petroleum products. The County shall notify 91
the Department of Environmental Protection where contamination exceeding 92
applicable Department of Environmental Protection standards is identified on site 93
or where an Environmental Audit or Environmental Assessment has been 94
submitted. 95
* * * * * * * * * * * * * 96
DRAFT Text underlined is new text to be added
Text strikethrough is current text to be deleted
4
G:\LDC Amendments\Advisory Boards and Public Hearings\DSAC\2021\02-03-21\Meeting Materials\Golf Course Conversion - Soil
Sampling DSAC 1-22-21.docx
# # # # # # # # # # # # 97
Exhibit A – Administrative Code Chapter 3.
5
G:\LDC Amendments\Advisory Boards and Public Hearings\DSAC\2021\02-03-21\Meeting Materials\Golf Course Conversion - Soil
Sampling DSAC 1-22-21.docx
K. Compatibility Design Review
Reference LDC sections 5.05.15, and LDC Public Notice section 10.03.06.
See Chapter 4.N of the Administrative Code for Intent to Convert Applications and
Chapter 8.F for Stakeholder Outreach Meetings for Golf Course Conversions.
Purpose The Compatibility Design Review process is intended to address the impacts of golf course
conversions on real property by reviewing the conceptual development plan for
compatibility with existing surrounding uses.
Applicability This process applies to a golf course constructed in any zoning district or designated as a
Stewardship Receiving Area that utilize a non-golf course use which is a permitted,
accessory, or conditional use within the existing zoning district or designation.
This application is not required for golf courses zoned Golf Course and Recreational Uses
(GC) seeking another use as provided for in LDC section 2.03.09 A.
Conditional uses shall also require conditional use approval subject to LDC section
10.08.00. The conditional use approval should be a companion item to the compatibility
design review approval.
Pre-Application
Meeting
A pre-application meeting is required.
Initiation The applicant files an “Application for Compatibility Design Review” with the Zoning
Division after the “Intent to Convert” application is deemed complete by County staff and
the Stakeholder Outreach Meetings (SOMs) are completed. See Chapter 4 of the
Administrative Code for information regarding the “Intent to Convert” application and
Chapter 8 of the Administrative Code for requirements for SOMs and additional notice
information.
Application
Contents
The application must include the following:
1. Applicant contact information.
2. Addressing checklist.
3. Name of project.
4. The proposed conceptual development plan.
5. The name and mailing address of all registered property owners’ associations that
could be affected by the application.
6. Disclosure of ownership and interest information.
7. The date the subject property was acquired or leased (including the term of the
lease). If the applicant has an option to buy, indicate the dates of the option: date the
option starts and terminates, and anticipated closing date.
8. Property information, including:
• Legal description;
• Property identification number;
Exhibit A – Administrative Code Chapter 3.
6
G:\LDC Amendments\Advisory Boards and Public Hearings\DSAC\2021\02-03-21\Meeting Materials\Golf Course Conversion - Soil
Sampling DSAC 1-22-21.docx
• Section, township, and range;
• Address of the subject site and general location;
• Size of property in feet and acres;
• Zoning district;
• Plat book and page number; and
• Subdivision, unit, lot and block, and metes and bounds description.
9. If the property owner owns additional property contiguous to the subject property,
then the following information, regarding the contiguous property, must be included:
• Legal description;
• Property identification number;
• Section, township and range; and
• Subdivision, unit, lot and block, or metes and bounds description.
10. Zoning information, including adjacent zoning and land use.
11. Soil and/or groundwater sampling results, if available, as described in LDC section
3.08.00 A.4.d. and 5.05.15 G.6;
12. The approved Intent to Convert application, as described in LDC section 5.05.15 C.1;
and
13. The SOM Report, as described in LDC section 5.05.15 C.3.
14. A narrative describing how the applicant has complied with the criteria in LDC
sections 5.05.15 F.3, including:
• A list of examples depicting how each criterion is met;
• A brief narrative describing how the examples meet the criterion; and
• Illustration of the examples on the conceptual development plan that are
described above.
Completeness and
Processing of
Application
The Zoning Division will review the application for completeness. After submission of the
completed application packet accompanied with the required fee, the applicant will
receive a mailed or electronic response notifying the applicant that the petition is being
processed. Accompanying that response will be a receipt for the payment and the
tracking number (i.e., XXX201200000) assigned to the petition. This petition tracking
number should be noted on all future correspondence regarding the petition.
Notice Notification requirements are as follows. See Chapter 8 of the Administrative Code for
additional notice information.
1. Newspaper Advertisements: The legal advertisement shall be published at least 15
days prior to the hearing in a newspaper of general circulation. The advertisement
shall include at a minimum
• Date, time, and location of the hearing;
Exhibit A – Administrative Code Chapter 3.
7
G:\LDC Amendments\Advisory Boards and Public Hearings\DSAC\2021\02-03-21\Meeting Materials\Golf Course Conversion - Soil
Sampling DSAC 1-22-21.docx
• Description of the proposed land uses; and
• 2 in. x 3 in. map of the project location.
2. Mailed Notice: For the purposes of this mailed notice requirement, written notice
shall be sent to property owners located within 1,000 feet from the property line of
the golf course at least 15 days prior to the advertised public hearings.
Public Hearing 1. The Planning Commission shall hold at least 1 advertised public hearing.
2. The BCC shall hold at least 1 advertised public hearing.
Decision Maker The BCC, following a recommendation by the Planning Commission.
Review Process Staff will prepare a staff report consistent with LDC section 5.05.15 F and schedule a
hearing date before the Planning Commission to present the petition. Following the
Planning Commission’s review, Staff will prepare an Executive Summary and will schedule
a hearing date before the BCC to present the petition.
Updated
Exhibit B – Administrative Code Chapter 4.
8
G:\LDC Amendments\Advisory Boards and Public Hearings\DSAC\2021\02-03-21\Meeting Materials\Golf Course Conversion - Soil
Sampling DSAC 1-22-21.docx
N. Intent to Convert Application for Golf Course Conversions
Reference LDC sections 5.05.15, and LDC Public Notice section 10.03.06.
See Chapter 8.F for Stakeholder Outreach Meetings for Golf Course
Conversions.
Applicability This process applies to applicants seeking to convert a constructed golf course to
a non-golf course use. Approval of this application is required prior to submitting
a conversion application (rezone, PUD, SRAA or Compatibility Design Review
petition). This application is not required for golf courses zoned Golf Course and
Recreational Uses (GC) seeking another use as provided for in LDC section
2.03.09 A.
Pre-Application A pre-application meeting is required.
Initiation The applicant files an “Intent to Convert” application with the Planning & Zoning
Division.
Application
Contents
The application must include the following:
1. Applicant contact information.
2. Addressing checklist.
3. Name of project.
4. The name and mailing address of all registered property owners’
associations that could be affected by the application.
5. Disclosure of ownership and interest information.
6. The date the subject property was acquired or leased (including the term of
the lease). If the applicant has an option to buy, indicate the dates of the
option, date the option starts and terminates, and anticipated closing date.
7. A title opinion or title commitment that identifies the current owner of the
property and all encumbrances against the property.
8. Boundary survey (no more than six months old).
9. Property information, including:
• Legal description;
• Property identification number;
• Section, township, and range;
• Address of the subject site and general location;
• Size of property in feet and acres; and
• Zoning district.
10. If the property owner owns additional property contiguous to the subject
property, then the following information, regarding the contiguous property,
must be included:
• Legal description;
• Property identification number;
Exhibit B – Administrative Code Chapter 4.
9
G:\LDC Amendments\Advisory Boards and Public Hearings\DSAC\2021\02-03-21\Meeting Materials\Golf Course Conversion - Soil
Sampling DSAC 1-22-21.docx
• Section, township and range; and
• Subdivision, unit, lot and block, or metes and bounds description.
11. Zoning information, including adjacent zoning and land use.
12. Existing PUD Ordinance, SRA Development Document, Site Development
Plan, or Plat.
13. An exhibit identifying the following:
• Any golf course acreage that was utilized to meet the minimum
open space requirements for any previously approved project;
• Existing preserve areas;
• Sporadic vegetation less than ½ acre, including planted areas, that
meet criteria established in LDC section 3.05.07 A.4; and
• A matrix demonstrating the following as required in LDC section
5.05.15 G.3:
o For conventionally zoned districts:
▪ County approved preserve acreage; and
▪ Any sporadic vegetation acreage used to meet the
preserve requirement for the conversion project.
o For PUDs:
▪ County approved preserve acreage; and
▪ Any County approved preserve acreage in excess
of the PUD required preserve acreage that is used
to meet the preserve requirement for the
conversion project.
14. Stormwater management requirements as required by LDC section 5.05.15
G.4.
15. Floodplain compensation, if required by LDC section 3.07.02.
16. Soil and/or groundwater sampling results, if available, as described in LDC
section 3.08.00 A.4.d. and 5.05.15 G.6.
17. List of deviations requested, as described in 5.05.15 C.4.a-b. The specific LDC
sections for which the deviations are sought shall be identified. The list of
deviations shall be shared with stakeholders at the SOM or NIM.
18. Electronic copies of all documents.
Application
Contents Required
for Presentations at
SOMs
In addition to the application contents above, the following must also be
submitted with the Intent to Convert application and used during SOM
presentations:
1. The Developer’s Alternatives Statement as described in LDC section 5.05.15
C, including:
• A narrative clearly describing the goals and objectives for the
conversion project.
Exhibit B – Administrative Code Chapter 4.
10
G:\LDC Amendments\Advisory Boards and Public Hearings\DSAC\2021\02-03-21\Meeting Materials\Golf Course Conversion - Soil
Sampling DSAC 1-22-21.docx
• No Conversion Alternative: A narrative describing the timeline of
correspondence between the applicant and the property owners’
associations relating to the applicant’s examination of opportunities
to retain all or part of the golf course as described in LDC section
5.05.15 C.2.b.i, and copies of such correspondence. It shall be noted
in the narrative whether a final decision has been made about this
alternative or whether discussions with the property owners’
associations are ongoing.
• County Purchase Alternative: A narrative describing the timeline of
correspondence between the applicant and the County to
determine if there is interest to retain all or portions of the property
for public use as described in LDC section 5.05.15 C.2.b.ii, and
copies of such correspondence. It shall be noted in the narrative
whether a final decision has been made about this alternative or
whether discussions with the County are ongoing.
• Conceptual Development Plan Alternative: A conceptual
development plan consistent with LDC section 5.05.15 C.2.b.iii, and
as described in the following section.
2. The conceptual development plan shall include all information described in
LDC section 5.05.15 C.2.b.iii, and the following:
• An Access Management Exhibit, identifying the location and
dimension of existing and proposed access points and legal access
to the site.
• A dimensional standards table for each type of land use proposed
within the plan.
o Dimensional standards shall be based upon the established
zoning district, or that which most closely resembles the
development strategy, particularly the type, density, and
intensity of each proposed land use.
o For PUDs: Any proposed deviations from dimensional
standards of the established zoning district, or of the most
similar zoning district, shall be clearly identified. Provide a
narrative describing the justifications for any proposed
deviations that are not prohibited by LDC section 5.05.15
C.4.
• A plan providing the proposed location and design of the greenway
(this may be included on the conceptual development plan):
o Greenway Design: A plan providing the proposed location
and design of the greenway and illustrating the following
(including any alternative designs as described in LDC
section 5.05.15 G.2.a):
▪ The proposed location of passive recreational
uses;
▪ Existing and proposed lakes, including lake area
calculations;
Exhibit B – Administrative Code Chapter 4.
11
G:\LDC Amendments\Advisory Boards and Public Hearings\DSAC\2021\02-03-21\Meeting Materials\Golf Course Conversion - Soil
Sampling DSAC 1-22-21.docx
▪ Preserve areas;
▪ Any structures or trails related to passive
recreational uses;
▪ Greenway widths demonstrating a minimum
average width of 100 feet and no less than 75 feet
shall be identified every 100 feet;
▪ Locations of existing trees and understory (shrubs
and groundcover) shall be located on the plan in
accordance with LDC section 5.05.15 G.2.e;
• A matrix identified on the plan shall
demonstrate tree counts used to
calculate the ratio described in LDC
section 5.05.15 G.2.e; and
▪ Location of any proposed wall or fence pursuant
to LDC section 5.05.15 G.2.f.
• A narrative describing how the applicant proposes to offset or
minimize impacts of the golf course conversion on stakeholders’
real property and provide for compatibility with existing
surrounding land uses. Identify the compatibility measures on the
conceptual development plan.
3. A narrative statement describing how the greenway will meet the purpose as
described in LDC section 5.05.15 G.2 to retain open space views for
stakeholders, support passive recreational uses, and support existing wildlife
habitat.
4. A narrative statement describing the public outreach methods proposed for
the SOMs, consistent with Administrative Code Chapter 8.F.
5. Web-based survey, including the following:
• A copy of the web-based survey;
• The user-friendly website address where the survey will be
available; and
• The dates the survey will be available.
Completeness and
Processing of
Application
After submission of the completed application packet accompanied with the
required fee, the applicant will receive an electronic response notifying the
applicant that the petition is being processed. Accompanying that response will
be a receipt for the payment and the tracking number (i.e., XX201600000)
assigned to the application. The tracking number should be noted on all future
correspondence regarding the petition.
Notice for the
Intent to Convert
Application
After the Intent to Convert application has been submitted, notice is required to
inform stakeholders of a forthcoming golf course conversion application.
However, no mailing is required if the applicant chooses to withdraw the Intent
to Convert application. See Chapter 8 of the Administrative Code for additional
notice information.
1. Mailed Notice: For the purposes of this mailed notice, written notice shall
be sent to property owners located within 1,000 feet from the property line
Exhibit B – Administrative Code Chapter 4.
12
G:\LDC Amendments\Advisory Boards and Public Hearings\DSAC\2021\02-03-21\Meeting Materials\Golf Course Conversion - Soil
Sampling DSAC 1-22-21.docx
of the golf course. The notice shall be sent after the Intent to Convert
application has been reviewed and deemed satisfactory by staff to proceed
to the mailed notice and SOMs, and at least 20 days prior to the first SOM.
The mailed notice shall include the following:
• Explanation of the intention to convert the golf course.
• Indication that there will be at least two advertised SOMs and one
web-based visual survey to solicit input from stakeholders on the
proposed project. The date, time, and location of the SOMs does
not need to be included in this mailing.
• 2 in. x 3 in. map of the project location.
• Applicant contact information.
2. Sign: (see format below) Posted after the Intent to Convert application has
been reviewed and deemed satisfactory by staff to proceed to the mailed
notice and SOMs, and at least 20 days before the first SOM. The sign shall
remain posted until all SOMs are complete. For the purposes of this section,
signage, measuring 16 square feet, shall clearly indicate an applicant is
petitioning the county to convert the golf course to a non-golf use (e.g.
residential). A user-friendly website address shall be provided on the signs
directing interested parties to visit Collier County’s website to access
materials for the SOM and the web-based visual survey. The sign shall
remain posted for 7 days after the last required SOM. The location of the
signage shall be consistent with Chapter 8 of the Administrative Code.
Public Hearing No public hearing is required for the Intent to Convert application. Public
hearings will be required for subsequent conversion applications.
Decision maker The County Manager or designee.
Review Process The Zoning Division will review the Intent to Convert application and identify
whether additional materials are needed.
Updated
DSAC Read ahead 2/3/2021
Phase I. - Phasing Out Property Permit Report (PPR)
General Overview
Existing Process
1. Real estate and construction industries request a PPR to identify all open permit
application/permit(s)associated with a particular address.
2. BPRS manually searches for ALL permits (i.e.open/closed)for a specific address through the
Property Appraiser, CD-Plus, and CityView.Additionally, each PPR is manually generated outside
of CityView and is then uploaded CityView.
3. BPRS provides PPR to customer.
Customer Handling of PPR
• Approximately 75%of our customers are only concerned with identifying open permits (ex.
Planning and Zoning Resources [PZR]—provides identified open permit(s)to lenders).
• Remaining 25%of our customers inquire about best practices to resolve identified open permit
application/permit(s).
Problems Identified
➢ A PPR is rendered obsolete the moment a new permit application is submitted.
➢ Customers want the most"up-to-date" information and request for an updated PPR.Which is
expending an excessive amount of internal resources to identify redundant permitting
information accessible to the public.
• An existing PPR has/continues to create misinformation regarding the status of open permits for
a particular address.
Modified Process
Transition from generating a PPR to empowering our customers to utilize CityView Portal
1. Customer request for BPRS to identify any open permit application/permit(s)for an address.
2. BPRS is responsible for converting open historical permits from the Property Appraiser and CD-
Plus into CityView.
3. Once the conversion(s) are completed, BPRS selects icon/attribute informing all interested
parties a historical permit review has been completed.
**Conversions are only for open Property Appraiser/CD-Plus permit application/permit(s)**
4. BPRS then redirects the customer to CityView portal to review all open permit
application/permit(s).
5. BPRS can then provide an efficient and effective public service in providing best practices to
resolve open permit application/permit(s).
IP
, ,:,::::,,,:..,,,,,..,..,„,,,,„
January2021
lvlonthly Statistics
4r T ,`. r; 4r 1
F l
,11 '-.• 44‘ ' ''' '\ '', ' •; ; ; , , .. ,
a.
t 4", 2900 .,COLLIER COUNTY
GROWTH MANAGEMENT
DEVELOPMENT SERVICES
tIq zano�zeoz
L
1/2021 Growth Management Department 1
Building Plan Review Statistics
All Permits Applied by Month
6,000
5,000
4,000
3,000
N
r- N O 00 (JD Lr1 d- to a., 00 l,D O cr M
111 o N. 1, Ni u1 01 n to d- Lo 00 m to Lin co to
N I Ct d' N M n1 M N O c-1 Ol d ,711 .-I
2,000 °r,' d' rn a o �r c1 ° v v' rn `t c1
M. ni m ni rri ni
ni
rYi
1,000
rn 0 rn rn a) rn 0 rn C T 0) 0) 0) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a-
N N N N N N N N N N N N N
L L >+ C C) C. — > C) C .Q - L >, C C) C. r > C) C
ca a) 2 C. as = _9 = a) c) 0 a) as a) al Cl as 7 -9 = a) c) o a) c0
u. .e Q g -) < V) O Z 0 ) u_ Q 2 < � O Z p
Top 15 of 35 Building Permit Types Applied
- Pool, ROW Residential, 122
j � 137
Plumbing,,\ Roof,409
288
' \
Mechanical, 545 Shutters/Doors/Windows,
536
ti' Gas, 233 Solar, 49
Aluminum
Fence, Bldg Structure,
likkoc Bldg
201 New
Electrical, 1 & 2, Add/Alt, 235
260 160 229 \ Well Permits,
Carport/Shed
51
1/2021 Growth Management Department 2
Building Plan Review Statistics
Monthly 1 & 2 Family Total Monthly Multi-family& Commercial Total
Construction Value by Applied Date Construction Value by Applied Date
$200,000,000 $200,000,000
$150,000,000 $150,000,000
$100,000,000 $100,000,000
1 /f 11' \
$50,000,000 . $50,000,000 -----
$- I I $- rrtej; ' ' I" r4. i "
rn 0) Cr) 0) 0 0 0 0 - 0) 0) 0) Cr) o 0 0 0
N- N- N- '- N N N (-1 (.1 ,- ,- ,- CAN N CV CAI I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
L U C L 7 U C C Q, U c 8_ U c
li Q -) O ( Q -) O 5, g Q -) O ( Q -) O
1&2 Family — —Multi-family Commercial
Monthly Total Construction Value by Applied Date
$200,000,000
$150,000,000
$100,000,000 All, -- •
i. ....dlibik.. _ AA& 44
A‘Adilk.
$50,000,000 \Noe VIIIPI 1411111I
0) 0) 0-) 0) O) Q) 6) 6) 0) 0) a) 0 O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C)
N N N N N N N N N N N N N
C -D >., C - LJ) Q > U C 2 >, C O) Q U > U C
4 2 g Q g 4 N O 2 8) g 2 g Q c4 4 - 0 2 0 4
� Q crop � Q c�
'4 1&2 Family —u—Multi-family Commercial
1/2021 Growth Management Department 3
Building Plan Review Statistics
New Construction Building Permits Issued by Month
400
350 -
300 _
PM MI
200 I I I I I I I I I n III I I III
150
100 H
I
HI
' ii ' ' '
I I
III III
rn rn rn rn 0 CI rn CI Cr/ rn rn CD 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a-
CI N N N N N N N N N N N N
as d co a 03 O O 3 a) V O a) cc a) 2 St- as O O = a) V O G) to
n Li. 2 Q 2 -) -' a v) O Z In n Li- .e Q E n - Q v) O Z 0
Jan- Feb- Mar- Apr- May- Jun- Jul- Aug- Sep- Oct- Nov- Dec- Jan- Feb- Mar-,Apr- May- Jun- Jul- Aug- Sep- Oct- Nov- Dec- Jan-
19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 21
oCommercial 4 5 4 6 7 8 3 11 9 8 15 5 9 4 7 4 5 7 5 6 3 3 3 6 7
■Multi-family 7 6 6 7 5 3 3 15 7 8 6 4 11 9 9 9 5 2 10 10 11 1 7 7 11
■1&2Family 316 218 261 251 254 250 274 263 285 306 235 182 232 234 250 192 205 196 234 296 248 352 244 314 357
New Multi-family Building New Commercial Building
Permits Issued by Month Permits Issued by Month
18
14 '' 16
12 __..
14
10 12
10 1
8
8
6
6
4
4 - -
2 _ 2 -
I '[ i I
0p
rn rn rn rn rn JI ..jr
0 0 0 - rn rn rn rn rn rn o 0 0 0 0 0
a- a- a- a- N N N N N N N N- l- N- V- c-
� i i � i � i i i i i i � � i i i N N N N N N N
L Q > C L � Q > C C L > Q > C L � Q > C
as
2 2 cn z° -) 2 2 co z 2 co , a) o co) co m o c)
2 U) Z � 2 g cA Z �
1/2021 Growth Management Department 4
BuildingInspections Statistics
Building Inspections
30,000
25,000
20,000
15,000
10,000 5,000 II111PIII ! ! 1111111111111
u- Q Q co 0 Z o g u_ 2 < - Q U) 0 Z o
Types of Building Inspections
Septic, 156
ROW, 521 �
j Structural, 9,007
Plumbing, 3,130
��% `
Mechanical, 1,835 "� 1
Electrical, 3,683
Land
Development,
1,352 Gas,
546
L WeII, 107
Pollution Control, 1
1/2021 Growth Management Department 5
Land Development Services
Statistics
All Land Development Applications Applied by Month
200
180
160
PI
1: iiiiaii
n I"'I 1111111
III ' IIIIIIIIIllIIIIII ' II
100
80 o1 �1I �IN1 �l � 1 . 1 I ^1 I I II 1 �1 I �II �I �INI � 1 1
60 TH liii i _ iIcol � l � i7i0i1li �i7i I
40 1111111 11111111111111111
20 111111111111111111111111
rn rn rn rn rn rn rn 0 rn rn 0) 0) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 r-
N N N N N N N N N N N N N
C . L L > C 0 O. '" > 6 C L L >1 C LA Q > V C
-� u. E Q g 2, n Q Cl) 0 Z o 4 u_ 2 Q g n Q In 0 Z o 2,
Top 5 Land Development Applications Applied
within the Last 6 Months
120 111
104
100
100
80
67
60 51
40
20
0
Zoning Verification Site Development Plan Vegetation Removal Utility Conveyance Lot Split
Letter Insubstantial Change Permit Final Acceptance
1/2021 Growth Management Department 6
Land Development Services
Statistics
Pre-application Meetings by Month
40 r-
35
S0
I I I
25 II fl I II im Ell
20 al 111111I
m l o
mi .
.1 m I nil
15 II1IIJ1ImI
I ri ' Ii IN " I '10 IIII I I II IIII FIFI I ' ll I H
rn a) rn rn rn a) rn 01 01 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 r—
N N N N N N N N N N N N N
11 L L >+ C 6) Q '''' > U C _a L L >+ C 0) Q rr > o C
cts �i 2 a g -, -) m p 0 C) -) Li Q f° /) - 0 m ca
Q cA g � Q cn � Z 0 n
Front Zoning Counter Permits Applied by Month
120 _.r,_m_�.. _�..
100 '
80
A HI I ri o
60 �DitiI ri tDLL
o F u,
cy 1TH
m cp ^ N
m tf! ill
40
20 �, a)
m LID Na)l mN m m I m `1 ci
N N N lD N N N m N N N CDlD N N Ql N
c-i N
al
0 C) C) C) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 —
N N N N N N N N CYO-
N N N N
1 1 1 I 1 I I I 1 I I I 1 1 1 1
C .a L L >. C �I a �' > o C .o L L >+ C �] a — > V C
la a) 0 a (a 3 = a) L) o a) ca a) a 7 _9 z a) o a) as
u. 2 < E Q v) O z 0 -) u- a Q 2 Q U) O z 0 -)
■ Temporary Use Commercial Certificates
1/2021 Growth Management Department 7
Land Development Services
Statistics
Number of New Subdivisions Recorded per Month
8 _.
7
6
6
C
0
•t/1 5
Yearly Totals
4 4
4 2019- 31
c 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 2020 25
3 2021 - 2
2 2 I 2 2 2 2 2
: 1111111 H1mile "
I 1111 I I 1011111
01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
N N N N N N N N N N N N N
C C C) 0- "-A
> C1 C .0 L L �, C a1 0- "'' > 0 C
C ti 7 7 d O 0 co G1 Q- to G1 V O a1 as
2 —� Q cn 0 z 0 u Q 2 Q cn Z
Plat Pages Recorded per Month
60
54
50
IC 40
a)
a Yearly Totals
46 30 27 2019 - 131
2020- 152
2021- 9
z 20 17 16 17
1314 14 13 1415
10 11111
97Ik. Il
11 . 11111
0
01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Co 0
N N N N N N N N N N N
C L >i a1 Q f7:' > V C .Q L L >+ C C1 Q. }' > C) C
1/2021 Growth Management Department 8
Land Development Services
Statistics
Monthly Total of Subdivision Applications
(PSPA, PSP, PPL, PPLA, ICP, FP, CNST) by Month
14
12
10
8
111I ! IIIPI1Ih ! III ! IIPI1 !
00NNN, -' > V C
�i Q E -) -, Q v) Z 0 cri LL B'. a Q CO M CDEo CD
< z
Monthly Total of Subdivision Re-submittals/Corrections
(PSPA, PSP, PPL, PPLA, ICP, FP, CNST) by Month
18
16
14
12111
III
8 �n I I H H ■ I 1 I 19 I VIII
4 1III Ii ICI Irlu I 1 ; 1
2 111111 III Ii I I I II IiII II I� I�
III II I 1 1 II II
O O O O O O O O O Q) O) O O O O O O O O O O O 0 x—
N N N N N N N N N N N
'cC) ICI) a C ' () O
LL 2 < U) OZ ) m2Q2 Cm)Q N O Z 0
1/2021 Growth Management Department 9
Land Development Services
Statistics
Monthly Total of Site Plan Applications
(SIP, SIPI, SDP, SDPA, SDPI, NAP) by Month
45
4035
I I
30 IMIIII � � II IIII
25 I I I�I I I I I I I r10I�I II I I LI�I
10 cIIIMIMIMIMIMI�I II Ii LI9 LII I IIJ I
15 I l°41 liii INI"I IN I I I I Iii I I I flLN
5
11111111111111111111111 I
rn C) rn or) rn o) a) 01 w 01 0) o) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Co 0 0 0 0 0 a—
N N N N N N N N N N N N
C .6 L L >, C G) a. — > V C .a L L >1 C C) a. �-' > U C
cC d c9 Q. cv 3 7 O O u) co a) _co cC a O a) C) 0 G) as� Q E Q N Z ❑ u a. 2 < v) 0 Z ❑
—)
Monthly Total of Site Plan Re-submittals/Corrections
(SIP, SIPI, SDP, SDPA, SDPI, NAP) by Month
60
40 I
I I
30 co
v �r1
20 r.111111111 `� ao Iv 14141
M Il
I . IIII 174121112121
L
10 N 1111111
0 I I
O 0) 0) O) O) 0) 01 0) Q) O) O Q) Co 0 0 0 Co 0 0 0 0 Co 0 0
N N N N N N N N N N N
C L L >, C a) a. *' > V c . - i >, C c) a. +' > c.) C
co a) a) a. a) a a d C) O O c6 G) c0 a. c4 7 a c O V O G) cC
u_ 2 < -, < 0 0 Z ❑ LL Q 2 - < v) o Z ❑
1/2021 Growth Management Department 10
Reviews for Land Development
Services
Number of Land Development Reviews
1,400
1,200
1,000
800
600 1111111111
M
co N
200400 00
a) a) a) a) a) a) 0) rn rn rn 01 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
N N N N N N N N N N N N N
I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 I I 1
C L L >+ C C) 6 �' > C1 C . L L >+ C a) Q �' > C) C
as N " �- c0 z 7 N V 0 d as fa �- co 7 V 0 a) as
u Q g - Q cn O z ❑ u_ 2 Q 2 -3 Q cn O z ❑
Percentage Ontime for the Month
0.6
99.4
Ontime Late
1/2021 Growth Management Department 11
Land Development Services
Statistics
Total Applied Construction Valuation Estimate
$25,000,000
$20,000,000
$15,000,000
$10,000,000 — —
$5,000,000
$0
a) a) 0 0 rn a) a) a) a) a) a) a) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 E
N N N N N N N N N N N6. N N
IC d O Q- IC V O d c4 O Q- O 7 7 G) V O N !0
u, 2 Q 2 n Q z -I u. 2 Q Q ci) O z o -�
Construction Estimate Utility Estimate
Site & Utility Inspections
80
70
60
0 50
v 40
Q
0 30
I U
o_ 20
10
0
O1 01 )iiPPii ; hiPü
CD Q U > U
LL 2 Q 2 < v, O z o LL 2 ¢ 2 < v°1i O Z oo
■ Final Subdivision Inspection •Final Utility Inspection
Preliminary Subdivision Inspection Preliminary Utility Inspection
Tie In Inspection
1/2021 Growth Management Department 12
Fire Review '
Statistics
Building Fire Review Average Number of Days
10
9
8
7
6
n3 5
4
3
2
1
IU'!I rn ¶111111
%--I r-I N N N N N N N N N N N N N
- i ? C - dA fl. i
cu ro z cu u O N rCo v r9 a j v U 00 N ro
fl-
`i 2 < 2 < 0 z D LL 2 < 2 -, < cn O z 0
Total Number of Building Fire Reviews by Month
Fire District Jan- Feb- Mar- Apr- May- Jun- Jul- Aug- Sep- Oct- Nov- Dec- Jan- Feb- Mar- Apr- May- Jun- Jul- Aug- Sep- Oct- Nov- Dec- Jan-
19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 21
a North Collier 471 447 596 645 711 729 725 709 621 688 488 470 410 458 633 565 510 642 645 564 558 588 429 586 427
Collier County(Greater Naples) 421 327 475 443 395 339 386 426 365 481 388 359 476 361 397 355 324 462 418 409 400 439 403 446 460
Planning Fire Review Average Number of Days
10
9
8
7
6
T 5
ro
CI 4
3
2
1
0
cn Ol Ol Q1 Ql CT/ Ol Ol Ql Ql Ql Ql 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 r-I
`-I r-I r-I ri r-I ri ri r-i r-I r-I ri r-I N N N N N N N N N N N N N
Z < - Q to O Z 0 g
Total Number of Planning Fire Reviews by Month
Fire District Jan- Feb-Mar- Apr-May-Jun- Jul- Aug-Sep-Oct- Nov-Dec-Jan- Feb-Mar-Apr-May-Jun- Jul- Aug-Sep- Oct- Nov-Dec-Jan-
19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 21
a North Collier 43 51 48 44 46 57 50 35 60 69 50 56 57 39 48 38 36 33 42 33 47 44 37 32 25
Collier County(Greater Naples) 77 63 66 82 72 71 66 76 59 66 63 63 57 72 62 48 62 62 52 61 59 62 61 51 44
1/2021 Growth Management Department 13