Commissioner McDaniel Ex parte Items - Commissioner William L. McDaniel, Jr.
COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AGENDA
January 26, 2021
ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS
9A ***This item has been continued from the January 12, 2021, BCC
meeting.*** This item requires all participants be sworn in and ex parte
disclosure be provided by Commission members. Recommendation to
approve an Ordinance amending Ordinance Number 2004-41, as amended,
the Collier County Land Development Code, which established the
comprehensive zoning regulations for the unincorporated area of Collier
County, Florida, by amending the appropriate zoning atlas map or maps by
changing the zoning classification of an additional 102.49+ acres of land
from the Rural Agricultural (A), Rural Agricultural with Special Treatment
Overlay (A-ST), Residential Single Family (RSF-3), and Residential Single
Family with Special Treatment Overlay (RSF-3-ST) Districts to the Sabal
Bay Mixed Use Planned Unit Development (MPUD) District; and to amend
the PUD Document and Master Plan to add 102.49+ acres designated as
Tract R9 for residential development; to add 230 dwelling units for a total
of 2,229 dwelling units in the MPUD; to revise the master plan and
conceptual water management plan; and to add a master site plan for the
R9 Tract. The subject property is located south of Thomasson Drive, south
and west of U.S. 41, north and west of the Wentworth PUD, and east of the
Naples Bay Intracoastal Waterway in Section 23, 24, 25, 26 and 36,
Township 50 South, Range 25 East, and Section 19, Township 50 South,
Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, consisting of 2,518.98* acres; and
providing an effective date. [PL20190002305]
n SEE FILE ®Meetings ❑Correspondence ®e-mails$Calls
All information has been filed electronically with Minutes and Records
Ex parte Items - Commissioner William L. McDaniel, Jr.
COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AGENDA
January 26, 2021
CONSENT AGENDA
16A6 This item requires that ex parte disclosure be provided by Commission
members. Should a hearing be held on this item, all participants are
required to be sworn in. Recommendation to approve for recording the
final plat of Isles of Collier Preserve Phase 15 (Application Number
PL20200001712) approval of the standard form Construction and
Maintenance Agreement and approval of the amount of the performance
security.
® NO DISCLOSURE FOR THIS ITEM
SEE FILE flMeetings Correspondence file-mails ['Calls
16A7 This item requires that ex parte disclosure be provided by Commission
members. Should a hearing be held on this item, all participants are
required to be sworn in. Recommendation to approve for recording the
final plat of National Golf and Country Club at Ave Maria, Phase 2,
(Application Number PL20200001505) approval of the standard form
Construction and Maintenance Agreement and approval of the amount of
the performance security.
NO DISCLOSURE FOR THIS ITEM
n SEE FILE ❑Meetings ❑Correspondence Ee-mails ❑Calls
Ex parte Items - Commissioner William L. McDaniel, Jr.
COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AGENDA
January 26, 2021
SUMMARY AGENDA -
17D This item requires that ex parte disclosure be provided by Board of Zoning
Appeals members. Should a hearing be held on this item, all participants
are required to be sworn in. Recommendation to approve a Resolution for
the establishment of a conditional use to allow a Government Safety
Service Facility for fire and emergency medical services within the Estates
(E) zoning district with a Wellfield Risk Management Special Treatment
Overlay Zone W-4 (ST/W-4), pursuant to Sections 2.03.01.B.1.c.8 and
2.01.03.G.1.e. of the Collier County Land Development Code for a 5.46+/-
acre property located at the southwest corner of the intersection of Golden
Gate Boulevard and DeSoto Boulevard in Section 9, Township 49 South,
Range 28 East, Collier County, Florida. [PL20190002680]
® NO DISCLOSURE FOR THIS ITEM
SEE FILE ❑Meetings (Correspondence Fie-mails nCalls
NO DISCLOSURE FOR THIS ITEM
From:Tim Owens
To:SaundersBurt;TaylorPenny;SolisAndy;McDanielBill;LoCastroRick
Cc:glubben1@mac.com;steve.young@empowerlight.com
Subject:Sable Palm MPUD - Executive Summary
Date:Sunday, January 10, 2021 10:14:44 PM
EXTERNAL EMAIL:This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender
and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links.
I’m writing about the upcoming agenda item at the upcoming BCC meeting. While this requested MPUD
annexation has already been reviewed at the Collier County Planning Commission, many current
residents of the Isles of Collier Preserve feel the petitioner's statements at that CCPC meeting overstated
and misrepresented current residents’ views on this annexation. The petitioner, Minto, has thus far not
committed to addressing any incremental amenities as they’d committed to the CCPC. Moreover, planned
amenities are incomplete with previously committed to nature walkways, wildlife viewing stations, and a
playground not even initiated nor completed. Many ICP residents feel this annexation unnecessarily
expands the Sabal Bay MPUD with no real benefits to current residents. Developer communications to
residents thus far suggest the developer has no intention to augment existing common property and
amenities. This seems to be in direct conflict to decision criteria for evaluating PUDA proposals that
stipulate any PUDA must not adversely affect the living conditions of the neighborhood.
Additionally, the proposed annexation exposes the HOA ‘assigns’ (current HOA homeowners) to future
and unknown infrastructural costs such as storm water and traffic infrastructure expenses when the
community is ‘turned over’ to the HOA at completion of the development. Importantly, the proposed
annexation of the ‘Fleischmann’ parcel is deemed to be within the MSTA (Municipal Special Taxing
Authority) and yet there is no explicit language in the petitioner’s applications to exclude the remainder of
the Sabal Bay MPUD from this MSTA obligation. We feel explicit exclusionary language must be included
as part of any PUDA approval to protect current MPUD home owners. In summary, we see no legitimate
benefit from integrating the processed Fleischmann parcel with the current ICP community and several
valid reasons to prevent such annexation.
With respect to the traffic consequences of this proposed development of 230 additional homes in the
Fleischmann parcel, we take the view a more complete evaluation of the likely 500+ additional cars per
day on the South/North portions of Bayshore Road has not fully accounted for other adjacent
developments along Thomasson Drive and Bayshore Drive, i.e., the Dells parcel, the Cirrus Pointe parcel,
the Mattamy Homes community on Bayshore and the row houses on Thomasson Drive currently under
construction. The PUDA’s associated Traffic Impact Statement (TIS) makes plain this PUDA will have
major effects on Bayshore and Thomasson Drives. (Reference page 30, line 5 of the Executive
Summary). This is in direct conflict with the summary findings provided to the BCC as part of their review
materials. We challenge the assumed traffic patterns comprised in the TIA associated with this proposed
PUDA on several fronts and believe in general it understates the traffic impact of this proposed
annexation.
Collectively, we believe this PUDA is inconsistent with MPUD rezoning criteria and will adversely
influence living conditions in the neighborhood in terms of reasonable access to and enjoyment of
community common property/amenities, along with the deleterious effects of increased traffic. (Reference
Page 5, Line 14 of the Executive Summary).We are asking for your vote to defer this agenda item
at the upcoming BCC meeting so residents’ issues and concerns can be presented and integrated
into the BCC’s deliberations on this proposed annexation. Please realize a large percentage of ICP
residents are seasonal residents and haven’t been fully involved in the deliberations of this proposed
annexation. The Covid 19 pandemic has introduced additional limitations on residents as well. We are
asking for your support to a request for temporary deferral of this agenda item until residents’
perspectives can be shared with the BCC. In so doing we believe you will be equipped with a full
understanding of the issues and concerns residents have with this proposal so a more informed decision
can be made.
Sincerely,
Tim Owens
5047 Tortola Ct.
Naples, Fl. 34113
23-682-6227
From:Sharon Grider
To:McDanielBill
Subject:Support for Sabal Bay PUD Amendment-Fleiscmann Parcel
Date:Monday, January 11, 2021 10:20:01 AM
Attachments:RE Support for Sabal Bay PUD Amendment-Fleiscmann Parcel.msg
EXTERNAL EMAIL:This email is from an external source. Confirm this is a trusted sender
and use extreme caution when opening attachments or clicking links.
Dear Mr. McDaniel
I hope this note finds you well.
I am writing to voice support for the request by Minto Communities to amend the Sabal Bay
PUD to add the Fleischmann Parcel to the PUD.
As I understand it, the County Planning Commission has recommended the amendment for
approval to the County Commission. This tells me that all necessary criteria have been met in
order to satisfy any legal requirements. However, a small, but vocal group of residents at the
Isles of Collier Preserve have voiced opposition to this request. I have listened to and
reviewed the concerns of these residents and in the end, do not agree with them.
To me, it seems their opposition is two fold; one based on conservation and the other based on
amenities.
Conservation concerns: I fully support the need to preserve nature in SW Florida. This is a
beautiful and unique part of Florida that indeed has historically experienced a lack of care for
our environment. However, Have to believe that any environmental requirements or concerns
have been fully vetted by Planning Staff.
Amenities:
It is my understanding, that the size and scope of the amenities of a particular
community is NOT one of the criteria upon which a PUD amendment is evaluated;
When taken as a whole, the amenities at the Isles are substantially the same or better
than what comparable communities have to offer;
Other than our Pickleball courts experiencing occasional overcrowding, our amenities
are generally under utilized.
Minto has gone on record offering to add 6 more Pickleball courts (as well as the
viability of 60 courts next door at ENCP).
Minto has offered assistance with what is currently the Sales office upon turnover to
provide additional space to address future needs at full build out.
I can assure you that most Isles residents either support this request (because of what Minto is
bringing to the table) or frankly don’t have an opinion on the matter. However, as I am sure
you are aware, it is uncomfortable for residents to stand up to other residents on matters like
this. After all, we will all be neighbors after this matter is resolved and Minto leaves. Please
do not be persuaded by a vocal minority.
Sharon Grider
5068 Tortola Ct
Naples, FL 34113